Deletion of Bridal Jitters

Comment: A google search for the film's title and "John Hale" returns just three hits, one of which is Wikipedia http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4HPEA_en-GBGB255GB255&q=%22Bridal+Jitters%22+%22john+hale%22. A search for "Bridal Jitters" & "Nicole Brunner" gets just two hits from Wikipedia http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4HPEA_en-GBGB255GB255&q=%22Bridal+Jitters%22+%22nicole+brunner%22&meta=. The source is apparently the film's producer, which would make the artilce blatant |original research, and I don't see any evidence that this film is an "unusual project... which was undertaken to illustrate a new approach in filmmaking". Either non-notable or a hoax, but either way the article should go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I appreciate the author's intent, but Wikipedia isn't the place for initial promotion of anything, really. When buzz starts about this project, and there are |reliable sources to document its notability, then an article might be appropriate. As it stands, though, the article is premature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)