Deletion of Nate Ackerman

Comment: meets , which is a much less stringent criterion than 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:PROF)

Comment: The rewritten article places the proper emphasis on his athletic achievements vis-a-vis his academic ones. He clearly passes , and the fact that he doesn't pass  is not especially relevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:ATHLETE|athletic competitor at the highest elevels of an International sport, |documented by multiple |reliable sources; passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:N)

Comment: In addition to passing , Ackerman passes . See http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2004/may/25/athensolympics2004.olympicgames this article from ''The Guardian'', http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/olympics_2004/wrestling/3911451.stm this article from BBC, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:BIO)

Comment: Per Cnilep’s comments and work on improving the article. Certainly does not meet , but I am pretty sure he meets the more general . I cannot comment on whether he meets any of the criteria for inclusion in WP as an athlete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Clearly fails rof on lack of cites. Not notable enough as an Olympic competitor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)