Deletion of EverlyWell (2nd nomination)

Comment: Clearly enough  coverage to pass GNG. whether the article needs a rerwite is not an AfD discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The topic has received in-depth coverage since last deletion but the page in its current state is -worthy. It is still a victim of  and would need a complete rewrite in my opinion to meet proper tone. On a complete separate note, I would suggest salting the page so that it needs a review through AfC and approval by admin for recreation. It does appear to at least have a COI in its creation (and possibly UPE) and is wasting everyone's time dealing with it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:REFBOMBING)

Comment: nothing to show that  is met. As in the previous AfD, the only thing that's been said about them is that they received funding money.  I have removed some of the company's own promotional/fringe claims from the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: there are enough sources to pass  however, it needs to trimmed for neutrality
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Coverage consists of funding announcements (which are trivial coverage per ), press releases and unreliable sources such as Forbes contributor pieces and Gazette Review, which https://gazettereview.com/privacy-policy/ "publishes articles written by users & freelancers" and states "a variety of companies provide products or services to GazetteReview.com for free in the hopes that their companies will be mentioned in reviews" , i.e., it's a spammy blog. Regarding the arguments that this should be kept to inform people that the tests are unreliable, that is emphatically |not what Wikipedia is for; refer to the edical disclaimer|official disclaimer that Wikipedia does not provide medical advice. There are many scams and stupid ideas in the world, we only write about the ones that are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NOT||WP:M)

Comment: this incarnation of the article in question is markedly similar to the version that was previously deleted. A  search for new sources (published between Jan 2019 and Jan 2020) turns some press releases and funding announcements, but nothing in-depth or truly independent from the subject. As far as my view is concerned,  is still not being met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NCORP)

Comment: This was easy last time, both at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EverlyWell and at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:EverlyWell.  It is difficult, because the question is now whether it has become |notable for |fringe science being peddled as medicine.  The insertion of the Criticisms section may be a clever way to sneak its real notability in.  The company isn't notable yet for being a successful home quack test product manufacturer, but the controversy does appear to be notable.  I disagree with
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: WP might be the only balanced source for consumers to find out the dangers of this company. The article can be cleaned up and the fringe unsourced parts removed. I am willing to make a start on the page. Also , more criticism will come up over time if the company is not doing peer reviewed studies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: sources read like press releases and routine coverage.  Still does not meet  "Good to know" is not an inclusion criterion. Wikipedia is not a consumer watchdog site. As Andy Dingley said. And "multiple doctors question" is nebulous, and does not do anything to show notoriety. There are plenty of non notable tests physicians feel doubtful about as a class, and this is just one non notable entity dealing with such tests. "Poised to grow", sounds like a marketing pitch. And Shark Tank is there to promote businesses
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)