Deletion of Pre channel

Comment: WTF -- Do people not bother to read?''' References are on the article's Talk:Pre channel|talk page. This should have never been relisted TWICE now. If this gets deleted this will absolutely show a lack of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:UCS)

Comment: or possible '''Merge/Redirect''' I've removed two sections of this article that failed , one of which also failed . Those certainly didn't qualify the entire article for AfD though. I've linked to a number of sources on the article's talk page that cover the rest of the article but I see no reason to work on rewriting/merging the article until after this AfD is closed. The general concept of a "pre channel" is well known and much of what is left in the article wasn't that difficult to validate. Finding sources to validate the list of commands (if they are even kept when this is revised) was much more difficult but the links on the talk page cover those too. If the nominator wanted to improve the article, he should have made a post on the article's talk page so someone could work on it vs tossing it up on AfD. With comments like ''"... it's unlikely that any reliable sources exist ..."'', ''"There's no way I can see it passing ..."'', and ''"... its unlikely that reliable sources do exist ..."'', it's pretty clear '''no one even bothered''' to try to source the material before nominating and "voting". I also feel I should point out this article has been constantly vandalized by people connected to the ''Warez'' scene who have been trying (unsuccessfully) to CENSORED|censor it for quite some time (see edit history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:EL||WP:NOTCENSORED)