Deletion of The Bible and rape

Comment: This article seems to be |original research for the most part, any information on this topic could easily be included in one of the related topics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The reasons for the article are irrelevant, the article needs to comply with . Statements such as "the God of the Bible has no problem with rape" particularly need to be |sourced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: as  violation with no sources.  If someone wants to write a better article with this title later on, let them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Pure |original research, copied from an |unreliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:RS)

Comment: per  and otability|notability in the absence of |sources, which may exist. I believe it is always |original research to identify a series of Bible verses and claim, on ones own word, that the verses form a coherent whole. One has to have proof that other people have seen these verses and thought them otability|notable enough to string them together in a similar way. Are there theologians or scholars who have written about the Bible and Rape in a manner similar to the article? If so, source, quote them, and keep the article. If not, this is not a notable non-original topic, and delete for  and failure to establish otability|notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: This appears to be a '''''' of the cited page, http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htm (which does not meet  criteria, as well as being ''very'' ) ... doesn't that close the argument? &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO||WP:RS||WP:NPOV)