Deletion of Kate Steavenson-Payne

Comment: although I found a http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/lat-st-maggiesmith-la0004791360-20130102-photo.html mention here, http://books.google.com/books?id=AC9DO7yanGwC&pg=PA222&lpg=PA222&dq=%22Kate+Steavenson-Payne%22&source=bl&ots=XiwYbCUX73&sig=uCLqCjTv0lpZVWfPalsPI6BWbCw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EvHnU_3pD4XksASusILQDg&ved=0CBwQ6AEwADgo#v=onepage&q=%22Kate%20Steavenson-Payne%22&f=false mention here in this book, and a http://books.google.com/books?id=keiJ6X18DGIC&pg=PA111&lpg=PA111&dq=%22Kate+Steavenson-Payne%22&source=bl&ots=hHSVkL1LJ_&sig=VOZrcBlt7uKicJPSmP3zm5OSN3E&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EvHnU_3pD4XksASusILQDg&ved=0CCQQ6AEwBDgo#v=onepage&q=%22Kate%20Steavenson-Payne%22&f=false mention here. Her http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/02/1086058905456.html?from=storyrhs face is here, and the picture emerging is a competent character actor who is in film and who has a name in a technical sense, but doesn't get much attention from the public regarding her off-screen persona, hence not much press, which is heartily unfair perhaps to the hard-working character actors, but such is life. I don't see the sources I found as meeting the  but I can change my mind if more sources are found or new arguments presented
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject fails  and . No sources are cites thus also failing . A Google yielded nothing that rings the notability bell. In fact it failed to turn up the  coverage one would expect for even minor non-notable actors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NACTOR||WP:V||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL)