Deletion of Viral drink

Comment: per . This concept may be notable, but this is |not a good start for an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NOT)

Comment: I've moved this back to the original title.  It's generally not a good idea to rename a page while an AfD is running, for the reasons outlined in .  It really messes up the operation of the closing scripts, and the potential for confusion is illustrated in the discussion above.  After this is over (assuming the article is kept), if somebody wants to move it back to the new title, that's fine.  But please leave it where it is until the AfD is over.  I am neutral
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDEQ)

Comment: WP:SYNTH without question. No  anywhere which indicates the notability of a so called phenomenon of a viral drink. Possibly some information here could be used to add to the viral marketing article, but the majority of the information as presented is ... FWIW - northern Italians have been drinking Aperol spritz for 50+ years... hardly a viral drink in that context ... this points to the inherent SYNTH issues of the article - in many cases these drinks have existed for long periods
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PROMO)

Comment: but needs lots of work. The article is now at Popularity spikes of drinks, which is a better article title, but still not great. I think there is some content here and it has been improved since the deletion nomination, but it's quite -y. The first four references do actually appear to be about the phenomenon of how drinks are marketed and see popularity spikes, so I think they demonstrate . The latter half of the article is a list and needs clear list criteria as per , but that's achievable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:GNG||WP:LSC)