Deletion of Plot of Naruto: Shippūden

Comment: This is in no way a "grotesque violation of the subject's copyright" or a "clear violation of Wikipedia policies and fair use criteria."  It fits perfectly with "a plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic."  It takes a bit of plot summary to describe 400 magazines and 250 television episodes.  It has to be broken down a bit, and that's what this is, see .  If you just glance at the page it looks like it's only covering a few episodes, but it's actually covering over 100 issues of the manga.  I can see why someone thought it was too large when they thought it was a single film.  You also may want to know this is http://toolserver.org/~leon/stats/wikicharts/index.php?wiki=enwiki&ns=articles&limit=100&month=03%2F2007&mode=view the 43rd most viewed article on all of wikipedia.  It's going to get a little bloated when 16,000 people are reading it every day.  Naruto related articles account for 8 of our top 100 pages, with about 100,000 page views a day, so they tend to get big.  People aren't saying delete because of notability, but just in case someone's thinking it, Naruto gets 32,000,000 google hits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The out of universe details are at Naruto|Naruto, although I don't know if that matters here. Can anyone comment on wikibooks|wikibooks?  It's mentioned in |, although from reading about it, I can't really tell if it is an acceptable location for plot summaries. (Jez, I need to stop thinking about this and just hit save, I've run up against the last two comments. and an edit!  =P
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: Extensive plot summaries without contect provided by external sources are a violation. See:  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:WAF)

Comment: Chris is right; this is a clear violation of Wikipedia policies and fair use criteria. ''No'' article should consist solely of plot summary, that much is clear from , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:WAF||WP:NOT)

Comment: This is a plot of of a "larger topic", the franchise is large and thus there's a lot to cover, #PAPER|As Wikipedia is not paper and I believe this fits in with our goals to create an encyclopaedia. I'd recommend somebody add some sources, however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Okay, enough with the hate accusations. I enjoy the series, but this article seriously needs to go (or at the very least, get split). Put things into perspective. It's not that I don't like the series; quite the contrary. This is the only anime I watch on a regular basis nowadays. However, this is not a Naruto fansite: This is an encyclopedia, and thus its articles have to be of encyclopedic value and must fit a certain standard. Per , articles that are strictly plot summaries are in fact not encyclopedic, and the article on its own is not near Wikipedia's quality standards in terms of its tone and excessive details. This could be fixed, but not without breaking the article into smaller parts. So, I maintain the split decision that I had above, but I am not opposed to an outright deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Fan comments aside, I stand with my previous nom. of ''Plot of Naruto I''. #IINFO|: "Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)