Deletion of Robin Bladimir (2nd nomination)

Comment: as |not notable, even |assuming everything in the stub is true. This is |patently an advertisement for a charity, but |Wikipedia is not a web host for do-gooders.  In fact, according to the Silver Rule, if 100 Wikipedians insisted on being fed by this man, three meals a day, in perpetuity, we would be taking away food for the needy, which he would no doubt feel is unfair
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AGF||WP:SPADE||WP:NOTWEBHOST)

Comment: May fail  since the subject of the article does not have significant coverage. The two sources are based on one source that may not be reliable. The article was speedily deleted on 17 July and has since been recreated. However, it remains promotional and does not contain substantial content to show the notability of the subject as a preacher
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've declined the G11 speedy deletion request — not because it doesn't qualify, but because the inevitable deletion here at AFD will be firmer, "stickier", more significant (or whatever you want to call it) than a speedy deletion as spam.  If someone creates another article on him after one spam speedy and one AFD for notability, and the new page is deleted, it will probably be |salted, but that might not happen if the two previous deletions were both un-discussed spam deletions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: unless significant additional sources are presented to establish notability; if they are, then '''rewrite''' thoroughly. Note this has been speedy deleted previously under #G11|G11 (Blatantly promotional) and has been tagged for G11 again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)