Deletion of Thomas Binford

Comment: I don't see how he could be confused with the other Thomas Binford (presumably meaning Thomas W. Binford). A googlebooks search for "Thomas O. Binford" gives 456 hitshttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=1131&bih=535&q=%22Thomas%20O.%20Binford%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp. GoogleScholar results are also pretty impressivehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&biw=1131&bih=535&q=%22Thomas%20O.%20Binford%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps, with top citation hits 543, 336, 324, etc. Given that he did most of his work in pre-internet era in the field with short shelf-life for most papers, that's pretty impressive. I have also added the info and the ref re him being an elected fellow of AAAI, where the election citation says: "for his role as a founding father in the field of computer vision and model-based perception in robotics". Plus I added a couple of refs to articles about him in Indian press. Certainly more work on the article is needed, but it is fairly clear that the subject passes both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Google scholar shows nine papers with over 100 citations each, a clear pass of #C1, and the AAAI Fellow is a pass of #C3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Subject is clearly notable with GS cites of 543, 336, 324, 258.... as shown by Eppstein. Nom should do efore before making further nominations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)