Deletion of Bill of Rights Defense Committee

Comment: From , "'''Significant coverage''' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." No detail is given in the sources cited by Cullen; they're passing, trivial references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not convinced that all of the five book sources mentioned by Cullen328 count towards . http://books.google.ie/books?id=cQ_drV0RBLMC&pg=PA147&lpg=PA147&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=m_dZRh_tTf&sig=7_bpk8HoN5VzkoA--IOCGNxvvOc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this fails independence because the content about BORDC is copied from their website; http://books.google.ie/books?id=BjKWfAz0tx4C&pg=PA583&lpg=PA583&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=tPGKIOY6cu&sig=sKmq_7FtjAWn7wmsK-EZd-NSIsM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this mentions BORDC in one sentence, hardly significant coverage; ditto for http://books.google.ie/books?id=BJD75iNQuMMC&pg=PA178&lpg=PA178&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=6ZBff_zRsS&sig=qNufB0NSNp_g_hcbHrYEvd5uUxk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pXQbUJHbEYfhiwLOp4C4Bw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this source and http://books.google.ie/books?id=I5Qa6j_mzpUC&pg=PT10&lpg=PT10&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=Np8479MlhE&sig=RsHOIDKN3MdgIBeGLpMdr0Ducwg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this one; http://books.google.ie/books?id=9OAjA2m66VQC&pg=PA193&lpg=PA193&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=BlOli9vsU2&sig=kDSvtvidi4_2COoVZtCT0mz_A0M&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this source has no preview, so I can't tell how significant the coverage is. The Spokesman-Review source, on the other hand, seems good, I'll see if I can find more sources of that quality
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: An Articles for Deletion debate should be about the inherent |notability of the topic, not about whether or not the highest-quality references now exist in the article. A Google Books search reveals http://books.google.com/books?id=Q5bFdpNNB5IC&pg=PA397&lpg=PA397&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=wPa_yARtge&sig=LTgr0TJPOmmtvnlG30pgMqfgp4M&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&ved=0CFwQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this statement about the group "The Bill of Rights Defense Committee has been supported by more than 114 legislatures in cities, towns and counties, as well as the states of Alaska and Hawaii." Significant coverage in reliable, independent sources includes http://books.google.com/books?id=cQ_drV0RBLMC&pg=PA147&lpg=PA147&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=m_dZRh_tTf&sig=7_bpk8HoN5VzkoA--IOCGNxvvOc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this and http://books.google.com/books?id=BjKWfAz0tx4C&pg=PA583&lpg=PA583&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=tPGKIOY6cu&sig=sKmq_7FtjAWn7wmsK-EZd-NSIsM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&ved=0CEoQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this and http://books.google.com/books?id=9OAjA2m66VQC&pg=PA193&lpg=PA193&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=BlOli9vsU2&sig=kDSvtvidi4_2COoVZtCT0mz_A0M&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this and http://books.google.com/books?id=I5Qa6j_mzpUC&pg=PT10&lpg=PT10&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=Np8479MlhE&sig=RsHOIDKN3MdgIBeGLpMdr0Ducwg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=CXMbUOmlKYWAiwKB5oC4AQ&ved=0CG4Q6AEwCg#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this and http://books.google.com/books?id=BJD75iNQuMMC&pg=PA178&lpg=PA178&dq=%22Bill+of+Rights+Defense+Committee%22&source=bl&ots=6ZBff_zRsS&sig=qNufB0NSNp_g_hcbHrYEvd5uUxk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pXQbUJHbEYfhiwLOp4C4Bw&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=%22Bill%20of%20Rights%20Defense%20Committee%22&f=false this. HighBeam Research shows coverage of the early months of the group in The Spokesman-Review in 2003 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-27350829.html here. The solution to the nominator's perceived notions about the shortcomings of the current version of the article is to expand the article and add better sourcing, not to delete an article about a notable topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)