Deletion of A Queendom of Eros

Comment: even though I question the legitimacy or validity of the specific award, that is not a criteria for notability under  nor . I have no idea if moodyz is considered a major award in its field but a reliable source has reported on it.http://allabout.co.jp/gm/gc/201937/2/. Further, the movie has received coverage in 2 different articles from that same sourcehttp://allabout.co.jp/gm/gc/201922/http://allabout.co.jp/gm/gc/202025/ and has had independent review.http://www.kobooks.com/archives/r-mird015.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and FILM. Lacks significant coverage in reliable and independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NFILM)

Comment: Just another adult DVD. Not convinced that this passes . While at first glance, the article appears to have an impressive list of references, on closer inspection, none of them constitute reliable third-party coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Fails  and FILM. What makes this stand out from all other similar titles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NFILM)