Deletion of Adi Bulsara

Comment: While the hoax issue ''may'' have been cleared up, although I am still concerned about the bogus sources and links like the conference supposedly held to honor him, there's still no way the subject meets /. My searches have not found a ''single'' instance of media coverage of the subject or independent recognition by notable people, and thus the article fails  as well. There are just no independent sources for the assertions which are clearly either autobiographical or written by someone with a |COI. All we have are non-testimonial primary sources -- raw lists of journal papers & co-authorship of technical books. (And as I pointed out, the Erdos 5 list is of no encyclopedic value.) That does not equal notability or prominence, but instead an attempt by someone with a COI to promote an obscure researcher into a Wikipedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:V||WP:COI)