Deletion of Foswiki

Comment: I do not have a |conflict of interest. I have no ties to Foswiki developers nor to TWiki.net. In the interest of full disclosure, I do maintain a TWiki 4.2.3 site as a minor part of my job, and I did notify the Foswiki developers of this Deletion notice because I thought they needed to know. So, let's call this "massive conflict of interest" all my fault and move on. The split between TWiki.net and the majority of the current developers is significant and notable because it represents a change of licensing. The Foswiki software is notable because it likely would not exist without a dedicated group of open source developers who worked on the TWiki software in the first place. Foswiki appears to have an active community and a viable 1.0 release. The topic is notable because the fork and the project name "Foswiki" is directly referenced in the article pertaining to the TWiki software
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: It seems we have a massive |conflict of interest here. Please understand articles are removed from Wikipedia because they don't meet |guidelines for inclusion, not based on how many developers work on the project or what it was forked from or what its features are
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I'll also admit that I am biased toward this project, as I have used TWiki/Foswiki for more than a decade.  That said, this is '''not''' a new project, it is in fact a continuation of TWiki, which is very notable in the history of wiki technology (it predates both Wikipedia and Mediawiki by several years), and was the first true "structured wiki".  The codebase is very mature, as are the developer and user communities, and the forking has raised notable interest in the technology media world (see references above).  I think it important that an objective entry be maintained to help people understand what the project is, that it is fact '''not''' new, etc..  My own interest in the project aside, I have reviewed the |guidelines for inclusion, and believe this is a useful and notable topic for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: No evidence of notability. The Keeps seem to be all from new users unaware of our policies and guidelines and especially otability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)