Deletion of MobileIron

Comment: Promotional tone is #G11|absolutely a reason to delete. However, it passes  handily. I'm borderline here as to whether the project is better off with the article here, but I don't see much here that could be salvaged if all of the promotional material were stricken, so I would advocate deletion without prejudice for recreation by a non-COI editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:GNG)

Comment: Promotional tone is not a reason to delete. There is very good evidence of notability in a good number of the 11 refs in the article. I consider the following |reliable sources: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2010/08/02/daily24.html, http://connectedplanetonline.com/mobile-apps/news/mobileiron-openet-mobile-data-costs-0805/, http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/090910-new-version-of-mobile-management.html, http://paidcontent.org/2010/08/03/419-mobileiron-raises-16-million-to-manage-smartphones-in-the-enterprise/, http://connectedplanetonline.com/mobile-apps/news/mogileiron-enterprise-app-store-1209/, http://www.enterprisemobiletoday.com/features/management/article.php/3902581/MobileIron-30-Enhances-MultiOS-Smartphone-Management-Software.htm, http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/wireless/2010/040510wireless2.html, http://www.crn.com/blogs-op-ed/mobility/219100646/mobileiron-takes-smartphone-management-to-the-cloud.htm, http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/print-edition/2011/06/03/mobileiron-software-draws-line-work-home.html. Press releases are not reliable sources but if a respected publication is willing to parrot a press release and a reporter puts their name on it, I consider it reliable. What's your criteria {{user|DGG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)