Deletion of Jorge N. Amely Vélez

Comment: the most appropriate guideline for this person is probably  which he seems to fail. Especially, he is not a fellow of IEEE. Any thoughts, Tony
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: The article's sources are: a link about the existence of a scholarship program (but not about Amely Vélez receiving it); patent listings; and a bibliographic entry for Amely Vélez's book. None of these do anything to prove notability. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, JSTOR, InfoTrak, and ProQuest turned up no reliable, arms-length sources. Does not meet  or . To quote , "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SCHOLAR||WP:GNG)

Comment: per above it fails ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SCHOLAR||WP:GNG)