Deletion of Renato M. E. Sabbatini (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:BARE|barely passes as notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Does anyone have access to a database to test this one against 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: As a matter of principle if a topic is notable in sources of one language it is suitable to write about in any language edition of Wikipedia. We have Portuguese-speaking editors and machine-translation is another possibility. So the question is not "should this be in the Portuguese Wikipedia instead", but rather "does he meet ?" From Google Scholar, citations to his work are not high (h-index ~6), but there are other criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I'd like everyone who has already commented to take a fresh look'' and either confirm or reconsider their prior evaluation. I have removed, step by step, all the material which was unsourced or sourced only by self-published material.  This turns out to be almost the entire article, because the blunt fact is that the only person who has written anything about Sabbatini is S himself, or his family ("S.H. Cardoso" is his wife).  The only exceptions are the sources for (1) his "Chamption of Innovation" listing, (2) his writing award, and (3) a cite, which I added, to a powerpoint presentation mentioning S's participation in forming the Brazilian Society for Health Informatics.  While S seems like a good guy who has done some creative things, he doesn't even come close to notability under , and even if he did it would be impossible to write an independently sourced article on him, because there are no independent sources (and S has had plenty of time to add them even while this discussion, of which he was notified, has been going on).  Unless someone can show where this logic is wrong, the article is a clear delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)