Deletion of List of Dragonlance artifacts

Comment: fails , I don't see any significant coverage of artifacts in Dragonlance as a whole, merely plot summaries (which don't qualify as significant coverage per ) for a few entries. Agree with nominator as to why such lists are not needed on WP. To efficiently deal with not-individually-notable fictional elements, we should just not mention them at all beyond what can fit into plot summary sections of notable articles. The need to make WP a directory or memorial to every fictional device (characters/objects/cities/weapons/ships/etc) that ever existed goes against  and particularly . Fan wikias are better suited to such a task
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:WHYN||WP:IINFO||WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: Contains only plot summary from fiction (#PLOT), no real-world discussion, therefore nothing worthy of inclusion. No reliable ''independent'' source is cited that discusses the topic of artifacts in this fictional world, making the topic also fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LISTN)

Comment: patently and irredeemably trivial, fails #PLOT.  Nothing here has even the slightest whiff of real-world notability, not even the pop-culture recognisability that, say, the Bag of Holding has
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  and , and I quote NOTPLOT: Articles "should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents. Such articles should be expanded". It's easy to expand the article with not-in-universe references to the works and years of publication where each artifact appeared, and NOTPLOT instructs us to do exactly that, which couldn't happen if the article is deleted. The article already contains elements that are not plot, such as the books, movies and video games that included. Expand those, and remove what can't be sourced. Even if that results in a stub,  is a viable alternative and preferred to deleting everything
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:STUBBING)

Comment: per BOZ and sources.  Nor is there any policy-based deletion criteria I can see above.   certainly doesn't describe this as it's easy to see what does and does not belong , WP:PLOT, stretched this far would apply to any "list-of-characters" list (Dr. Who etc.). And frankly we already had an AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)