Deletion of Line of succession to the former throne of Travancore

Comment: per nom and TompaDompa. The article does not cite RS and I don't believe this could be verifiably sourced and not contain substantial  | . &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per what I wrote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Vadodara (Baroda): "per nom, , and . The |consensus developed has been that heirs of defunct states, especially non-sovereign one, are not notable. It's ultra-unlikely that this will ever become independent, re-create its monarchy, and find the missing heirs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CCC)

Comment: per -REASON 6: {{tq|Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources, including wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|neologisms, wikipedia:No original research|original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes|hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)}}. It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to  sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:RELIABLE)