Deletion of Casale Media (2nd nomination)

Comment: this article about an organisation does not assert notability.  Nothing here lifts it above .  (I realise the speedy delete isn't going to get up given the volume of discussion and the history, but the point is that it's incumbent upon articles about organisations to not just have the potential to assert notability, but to actually do it.) —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: See, perhaps Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ad-Up (2nd nomination), related to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casale Media|spurious first AfD of this article in 2006. I will agree that the current sources are not sufficient to indicate notability, but the http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2007/02/Top_US_Online_Properties comscore.com article contains information suggesting that decent enough sources could be found to pass , if not . Someone might want to tap {{user|redvers}} since he was involved in the old AfD. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)