Deletion of Richard Sternberg

Comment: before somebody else makes a comment like "editor in chief of an important journal" or "editor-in-chief of a major well-established academic journal", I would suggest that they provide ''evidence'' supporting the claim that the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' (the only journal he has been editor-in-chief of) is especially prominent because, as far as I can see, the claim is 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: this article contains no useful information which is not duplicated in the Sternberg peer review controversy article. We don't need to have two articles on substantially the same topic. Personally, I'd actually prefer to merge the peer review article into Richard Sternberg, but  advises us to go the other way
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:BLP1E (albeit milked for self-imposed martyrdom over the years).  rationales 'context' and 'overlap' would seem to apply
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGE)