Deletion of 2000 Australia Beechcraft King Air crash

Comment: Does the fact that an aural warning was added to the aircraft, and that a specific check list introduced for cases when a controller suspects a case of pilot hypoxia satisfy the "The accident resulted in a significant change to the aircraft design or aviation operations, including changes to national or company procedures, regulations or issuance of an Airworthiness Directives (or the equivalent to an AD in the case of non-certified aircraft)." criteria?  And therefore is this an issue of, at the moment, not meeting , not of failing 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AIRCRASH)

Comment: meets  and well-referenced by articles from 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2011, sidestepping 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)