Deletion of My Brother (book)

Comment: Not every source presented by TopGun is a winner, but enough of them do to establish |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Based on my review of the sources given by TopGun above the article fails  which says ''The book has been the subject1 of '''multiple, non-trivial'''2 published works whose sources are independent of the book itself.3 This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple '''plot summary''''' As we have but one review on the book then it will not be possible to expand it beyond a '''plot summary''' which the one review given actually is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: I have cleaned up the article some, added some of the sources, etc. Another thought: Beyond the sources argument, I also wonder if it passes  point #3 - ''The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or '''political''' or religious '''movement'''.'' Considering how influential the writer and subject are in Pakistan's development, how the book is all about detailing his political achievements because it was felt other biography's didn't do a good enough job, and how frequently the book is mentioned in biography's of the two, I feel it could be relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)