Deletion of Stevie Awards (2nd nomination)

Comment: I guess I should point out the issue I have with the original AFD. Of the three articles cited there as evidence of notability, one is a press release. Another appears to be a part of the initial PR push (after which press coverage becomes close to zero), and while I can't access the third article about Richard Branson winning the award, the title suggests it's a press release too. Now, I suppose the multiple articles published in April/May 2003 would ''technically'' give this article the OK under , I don't think it follows the spirit of the rule. It seems apparent that this award doesn't warrant coverage on its own merit (especially once its novelty has worn off), and only gets vanity mentions from people looking to make their CVs look shinier
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)