Deletion of Alektra Blue (3rd nomination)

Comment: Total '''lack''' of coverage in reliable secondary sources.Echo {{U|Spartaz}}.Irrespective of ,  must be met.If sources are provided, I'm willing to change my opinion.And please don't rely on number of GoogleHits.Take time to check the sites too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per : {{tq|A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline}}.  superseeds  in this case. Regardless of the content of the article (which I have deliberately not looked at), arguments made at
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: In my opinion sourcing seems sufficient to satisfy subjects notoriety, believe it meets ornbio
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per those above - meets |GNG and |PORNBIO. A couple of the external links should probably be converted to references. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PORNBIO)