Deletion of Anushka Wirasinha (2nd nomination)

Comment: Whilst there are several references mentioning her directly, I can't find anything to show  is met. The sources are also of questionable reliability, for example http://www.thesundayleader.lk/archive/20030706/arts.htm this (and others) is hardly neutrally written and says it was in the bestsellers at indiatimes.com but neither a site specific google search nor google news bring up any evidence of this being true. Similarly reference 4 "Financial Times. More Tech books from Prolific Writer. 2002." appears to be made up as far as I can tell as again I cannot find any articles on ft.com or in an archive search with ProQuest that are about her. Because of these doubts with the reliability of sources in the article, I am not convinced the |general notability guideline is met either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per Smartse and Andy Dingley. There are a lot of references , some of which vaguely mention the subject, but insufficient number that  comply 10% with . Subject might be notable, but Wikipedia needs proof of it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: looks like . and as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO||WP:NOTRESUME)