Deletion of List of terms in The Twelve Kingdoms (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is an unsourced list of fictional trivia. Much of it seems to be |original research, in that many of the entries are editors' own interpretations and speculations when the primary source doesn't state these things explicitly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I honestly think these glossaries are harmless and a reasonable part of an article - which can then be spun off due to |summary style if it gets too long.  However, fair enough that Wikipedia has trended against this kind of thing; just no need to delete the page - merge & redirect it so history is not lost.  I'll do it myself if nobody else particularly objects (but, unless the page is a copyvio or something, I can't see a good reason not to do at least a minimal merge
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: SnowFire, why should we merge unreferenced, unverifiable content into another article in main space?  We don't keep material because it is "harmless" but instead because the material is verifiable and encyclopedic.  If you are so interested, why not userfy the content instead of merging, so that you can search for |reliable sources that discuss this content at your leisure?  If it's not |verifiable, then it doesn't belong on Wikipedia.  So, if you find reliable, independent sources and add them to a draft in your sandbox, you can bring the improved material back to main space
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)