Deletion of When Doctors Disagree (short story)

Comment: just because Wodehouse is notable, doesn't obligate us to host an exhaustive plot summary of every obscure short story he ever published. This story fails our notability tests; and |cannot "inherit" notability just because it's by a notable person. Neville-Smith's reasoning completely escapes me, since this is not Wodehousepedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Per  criteria #5, while notability is not generally inherited, this author seems to be of such a stature that any work written by him is notable by virtue of his having written it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: or '''Merge'''. There seems little dissent that P. G. Wodehouse counts as a major author and brings criterion #5 of . The question is whether this should be applied to just The Man Upstairs or all stories within this book. However, I think there can be little doubt that a plot summary has a place somewhere in Wikipedia, either in this article or part of The Man Upstairs article (possibly in a condensed form). I don't think deletion is a serious option
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: into The Man Upstairs, with a redirect. We must remember that  also applies, and therefore the article should not be stand-alone unless we have eal world|real-world information. The Man Upstairs, being a compilation, should conceivably have more |verifiable information and S|reliable sources discussing it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTJUSTPLOT||WP:R||WP:V||WP:RS)