Deletion of Kenneth Gentry

Comment: there are no sources whatsoever in the article so it does not meet , which requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources - a search revealed no reviews of his books, discussions of his work or his contribution to theology - non-notable due to lack of reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: per  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:BASIC requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources, it does not require such sources to be in the article, i am reminded of  - "Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.", as for book reviews, as brought out at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Before Jerusalem Fell there have been, at least for this book, reviews
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN)

Comment: per  #1. Google Scholar shows a high level of citations (h-index of 10) for theology. The fact that he is a contributor to the ''Four Views on the Book of Revelation'' book shows that he is the foremost proponent of the Preterism|preterist viewpoint. Yes, this is niche - but still notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)