Deletion of Brit + Co

Comment: Several significant mentions in Fortune http://fortune.com/2014/12/03/brit-co/, http://fortune.com/2015/06/09/brit-co-snapguide/, http://fortune.com/2015/05/21/brit-co-raises-23-million-for-its-diy-empire-targeting-millennials/, http://fortune.com/2015/11/27/snapchat-discover-brit-co/, the LA Times http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-snapchat-brit-co-holidays-20151126-story.html, and TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2015/06/09/britco-confirms-20m-raise-led-by-intel-acquires-how-to-app-snapguide/ seems to be enough to sastify . Problems with tone can be solved through editing (e.g. removing stuff sourced to the company's own pages and PR Newswire
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Meets  per a review of available sources. Concerns with promotional elements can be addressed by |copy editing the article. Below are the sources I am basing my !vote upon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: satisfies  per sourced listed by North America and Patar knight. The possibility that paid editing may have occurred doesn't have any bearing on whether the article's subject meets our notability standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Per NA1000's links listed above, the company clearly has significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. It meets both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)