Deletion of Rent: Filmed Live on Broadway (film)

Comment: Nationally released films, especially from a company such as Sony, are notable. In response to Fletcher's and RGTraynor's comments, the fact it ties in as a marketing tool for the play is irrelevant, as this is a separate entity, no different than, say, a filmed version of a Shakespeare play deserving to have its own article. This article needs expanding, badly, but it's perfectly viable. And one  is not a viable argument; if the film is released by a major company and is the subject of reviews, then it's notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Another AFD discussion relating to a book a few days ago also have editors trying to disqualify reviews as viable sources or indicators of notability. Please bear in mind there is Wikipedia policy declaring these things completely kosher. If you want them disqualified, you need to propose policy change
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I wouldn't call this notable; ''Rent'' is notable, and this is just another vehicle for distributing ''Rent''.  I don't think it's sufficiently differentiated from ''Rent'' to merit a separate article.  This is reflected in the lack of demonstrated notability.  The program guide should of course be deleted under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)