Deletion of Rainbow Gravity theory

Comment: Just because it may be wildly incorrect doesn't mean that it's an automatic delete, but that  applies. RG appears to have originated with João_Magueijo and Lee Smolin -- their http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/21/7/001/meta 2004 article has been cited by 164 articles. Magueijo was still working on it as of 2013 in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257459742_Intermediate_inflation_from_rainbow_gravity this paper with John D. Barrow. Per http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rainbow-gravity-universe-beginning/ this article, Smolin has moved in favour of Relative locality. Even (contrafactually) if every paper on the topic happened to have been written by random http://snarxiv.org/ SnarXiv generation, the fact that it got the https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rainbow+gravity%22&tbm=nws ''quantity'' of tabloid/popsci buzz it did is somewhat notable, regardless of the ''quality'' -- or lack of it -- of that buzz. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: as it meets , there is plenty of material available.  I agree that  applies, but dealing with that is for the article's talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)