Deletion of San Patricio Plaza

Comment: Ridiculous assessment by nominator. Subject meets all requirements established by . Lack of reliable sources or the way the content is presented does not merit deletion: that's simply a content issue. Reliable sources can be found by performing a simple search on ''El Nuevo Día'', ''Primera Hora (Puerto Rico)|Primera Hora'', ''Caribbean Business'', ''NotiCel'', ''El Vocero'', and ''News Is My Business'' which are all considered reliable sources by Wikipedia as well as being :Template:Newspapers published in Puerto Rico|local newspapers in Puerto Rico. Per , nominator's good intention is duly noted, but his assessment is quite off. Nominator is encouraged to add the reliable sources himself if he is so preoccupied about such matters per  and  by using the following Google searches: http://www.google.com/search?q=san+patricio+plaza+site:elnuevodia.com http://www.google.com/search?q=san+patricio+plaza+site:primerahora.com http://www.google.com/search?q=san+patricio+plaza+site:noticel.com http://www.google.com/search?q=san+patricio+plaza+site:vocero.com http://www.google.com/search?q=san+patricio+plaza+site:caribbeanbusinesspr.com http://www.google.com/search?q=san+patricio+plaza+site:newsismybusiness.com &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AGF||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM)

Comment: I was not ready to comment on this when the nomination first opened up, given the dubious "short-and-sweet" style of the nomination. However, now I have to agree with the arguments opposing the nomination for a delete since the Notability arguments presented since adequately satisfy . '''My name is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)