Deletion of George de Menil (2nd nomination)

Comment: I think he may qualify as , which combined with his role as adviser to the presidents of Ukraine and Romania (and his subsequent publications about their economies) make him notable. I've run into this before when trying to compile info for a bio - economists are very rarely the subject of articles and with so many journals and papers it's hard to know which ones are truly important. Maybe someone more knowledgeable about economics/academia can give insight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: it needs work, but I see he can pass  at least
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I found http://www.nytimes.com/1986/05/18/magazine/the-de-menil-family-the-medici-of-modern-art.html?pagewanted=3 this source, which states that he was {{tquote|"founding director of the economics research division of the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences in Paris"}}. I believe that that, stated in the New York Times, is sufficient to establish notability under  criterion 6. The rest of the (non-independent) sources can be used to establish facts. However, I feel that the rest of the sources do need a bit of a trim
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The subject fails #C1 if only papers are considered, with a h-index of 9 and 500 citations. However, the subject seems have some significant publications and contributions, as evidenced by the article, which ''may'' pass #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)