Deletion of Winfield Hill

Comment: His book ''The Art of Electronics'' has huge citations on Google Scholar (over 5000); see e.g. https://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/tools-toys/more-treasured-texts or https://www.electronicdesign.com/communiqu/article/21802785/this-new-edition-is-a-musthave-electronics-classic for a recent review. (His other citation counts are not so impressive, especially if you exclude patents.) In fact, I think a lot of the difficulty with finding more material for the article is that the book is so successful that it drowns out all other search results. With one notable book and not much else I would normally suggest redirecting to an article on the book, but I think that directing an institute at Harvard, being a co-author on a widely-publicized technique for catalyzing CO https://www.techexplorist.com/new-catalyst-turns-pollutant-into-fuel/18361/, and founding a company whose instruments are the subject of multiple independent publications https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6291(77)90486-6 https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.1974.1161428 https://eprints.hrwallingford.com/290/ should be enough to save this from 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: The Art of Electronics|Horowitz and Hill" is one of those texts that is so standard, it is known by the authors' names. It's canonical, like "Classical Electrodynamics (book)|Jackson" for electromagnetism or "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information|Nielsen and Chuang/Mike and Ike" for quantum information. You'll find it in syllabi all over the place &mdash; https://www.its.caltech.edu/~ph118/syllabus.pdfhttps://ocw.mit.edu/courses/edgerton-center/ec-s06-practical-electronics-fall-2004/syllabus/https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/media-arts-and-sciences/mas-836-sensor-technologies-for-interactive-environments-spring-2011/readings/https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-071j-introduction-to-electronics-signals-and-measurement-spring-2006/readings/https://web.northeastern.edu/heiman/2371/syllabus.htmlhttps://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/physics/documents/undergrad/spring2020syllabi/Electronics-for-Scientists-Syllabus-Spring2020.pdf, and then I stopped looking. That's a pass of #C4. Any "|only notable for the one thing" concerns are alleviated by the other points raised by {{u|David Eppstein}} above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Passes rof#C1 easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Doesn't assert any of the significant points in the criteria under  and it's been flagged for years as problematic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)