Deletion of Nahar Singh

Comment: there's strong evidence that this prince existed, for example https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xr4SAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA2-PA33&dq=%22Rajah+Nahar+singh%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UFCYVffBAY2x7Qb7vozYAg&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Rajah%20Nahar%20singh%22&f=false the petitions he made to the King and http://www.gktoday.in/1857-revolution-hero-nahar-singhs-letter-up-for-auction-in-london/ one of his letters turning up at auction. As an Indian ruler and someone who was executed after the Indian Rebellion, one would presume the likelihood that he was notable enough for Wikipedia. However, the penultimate section of the current article suggests he's been forgotten and unrecognised (which contradicts the remainder of the article). Being such a bloated, one-sided, unsourced essay, maybe it is an entirely |original work and  would be a solution. I've left a message at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BLOWITUP)