Deletion of Josh Barro

Comment: Let's be objective here. The man is not |notable. If he was, the article would be filled with much more content instead of being a two-sentence stub. If there was more notable information to add, then I would wait and see until someone could come up with a decent claim to notability. But after |Google testing and researching about the subject, there doesn't seem to be any information that is worthy to be included in the encyclopedia. The subject is also pretty much an orphan, being wikilinked in only two other articles (One of which is Robert Barro, the subject's father. In fact, the footnote that explains who Josh Barro is in Robert Barro's page could be expanded to include the information said here. You could call this a ''Merge'' vote, but the fact is, the article is not notable and doesn't belong on the encyclopedia. Perhaps Josh Barro will gain notability in the future, but |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and we have to deal with what we have. I vote to Delete it, or at the very least, to ''Merge'' these two sentences into Robert Barro's footnote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GOOGLETEST||WP:CBALL)

Comment: Barro has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of him. This is the standard set in . There are comments above trying to create a higher standard for inclusion as a stand-alone article, but one does not have to be the subject of a cover story in People (magazine) in order to warrant one's own entry in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)