Deletion of Brentalfloss (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are sources already in the article, such as http://web.archive.org/web/20120401060241/http://www.thetimesnews.com/entertainment/youtube-46270-most-personal.html this one, that discuss the subject in detail.  The subject isn't the subject of the ''The New York Times'' and ''Tulsa World'' articles, but it meets the "significant coverage" part of , as no original research is needed to extract the content, and the subject has more than a trivial mention.  There's also http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/5614/20130316/video-game-music-video-official-skyrim-star-craft-2-heart-of-the-swarm-bioshock.htm this, which by itself doesn't show much, but I think that all of these together do show notability for the subject.  Granted, it's not the strongest case for notability, but I do think it meets , given that there are multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject that have significant coverage of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)