Deletion of Con Games (movie)

Comment: This is one of those cases in which the arguments must be weighed, not counted. I would contend that none of the "keeps" are based upon WP policy or guidelines, but all boil down to just "I like it" and should be disregarded. Once the sources are evaluated, only one, the Film Threat source has even any ''potential'' to be an adequate source to show notability per  and one is not enough to establish notability, even if it is eventually proven to be reliable. Best regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: now... and allow continued improvements. While we can all agree that what was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Con_Games_%28movie%29&action=historysubmit&diff=427462168&oldid=427461960 first nominated was unsuitable as an article, since the last coment toward deletion above, it has already been http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Con_Games_%28movie%29&action=historysubmit&diff=428436062&oldid=427459539 markedly improved though sources easily found.  Admittedly there '''is''' more to do... but it serves the project to allow continued improvents, as |delteion is not the best option when with just a litle work something can be improved to serve the project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)