Deletion of Ankit Fadia

Comment: The question here is not whether most of the other hackers in the world call him a script kiddie or something worse, but whether he passes . He is the most notable "hacker" in India and is accepted by the media as such. A search for "ankit fadia" gives 30000+ ghits. The article cites BBC which says the same thing. His first book "The Unofficial Guide to Ethical Hacking" was a best-seller. A look at the history of the article sill show that this user has a strong bias against Ankit Fadia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ankit_Fadia&diff=70419979&oldid=70419381, (assuming that all the IPs belong to the same person). The http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ankit_Fadia&oldid=52915886 first version of the article was written by a fan, but I managed to do a major cleanup of the article to what it was. This particular user has also cleaned-up a bit more removing some more unsourced facts http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ankit_Fadia&diff=69042650&oldid=68427166. But lately he has started removing the citations too http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ankit_Fadia&diff=70561051&oldid=70420143
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per above. Has verifiable publications, appears to meet the  criteria ''The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field'' and ''The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person''. The fact that "some people consider him XYZ" is irrelevant (though could, if verifiable, be added to the article). Brian Sewell|Some people consider Nicholas Serota "furthers worthless careers", which alters his notability not one jot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)