Deletion of The New Hate: A History of Fear and Loathing on the Populist Right

Comment: Well, what's above pretty much covers it; a nomination oblivious to  for a book that passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NBOOKS)

Comment: for abuse of process. With multiple coverage of the subject in academia and the high-end press, this nomination stretches  to the breaking point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: Meets criterion one to begin with, as the small sample of sources in the further reading section demonstrates.  Has the nominator considered  and an attempt at actually ''reading'' the books notability guideline that he cites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: In addition to the reference already in the article, there are other non-trivial sources including http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/inside_the_new_hate/ Salon, http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-18812-the_new_hate_arthur_goldwag.html Willamette Week, http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/mccarthy-beck-and-the-new-hate/252740/ The Atlantic, http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/monger-mongering/Content?oid=5619842 The Porland Mercury, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arthur-goldwag/populist-right-hate_b_1242293.html Huffington Post, a couple of minor newspaper mentions and several other Ghits that I did not follow. It seems to more than meet the notability requirements of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: and warn Belchfire that retaliation noms are not acceptable, per . I understand you have a disagreement, with Viriditas, but wasting our time on your feelings is disruptive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)