Deletion of Kirkby High School

Comment: The rubric for GNG can be confusing. We are here to discuss the '''Wikipedia concept of Notability''' not fame or unusual aspects or notability. We need to prove that there are at least two independent reports about the school. Here  we have 3 Ofsted reports that track its rough history. https://files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/2490323 One , https://files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/2677629 two and https://files.ofsted.gov.uk/v1/file/50045522 three. The https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/local-news/kirkby-high-school-7540008 Liverpool echo is the paper to visit for further reports, and this gives us analysis of the stats. We don't need more to prove notability but https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/how-mersey-school-labelled-one-15826293 Liverpool Echo Feature article  is on how the school came out of special measures. This is also the successor to Ruffwood School, and the https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jan/29/knowsley-education-catastrophe-a-levels-merseyside Guardian Feature is a delight to read and give more material. There is no question, this meets  and the article is almost writing itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Article does not meet  or  / (). The sources in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSCHOOL||WP:ORGCRIT)