Deletion of Earnings for architects

Comment: So I saw this and went through a similar viewpoint to you - I had a flick round, and there don't seem to be any other comparable articles. It certainly looks like it should be part of another article. But i then ran through Wikipedia:Deletion policy, and none of the grounds looked wildly violated - it didn't seem to fail the "not for Wikipedia" grounds, so notability was the only remaining one. I then had a look through  & . None of the grounds here seemed to be specifically breached either - just logically being part of another article doesn't prohibit having its own. I'm going to remain as a comment for now to see if someone better up on their Notability can explain differently - otherwise I'll shift my Comment to Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)