Deletion of James G. Lindsay

Comment: fails /. No evidence of his notability has been presented and there seems to be none to found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: Keep and Expand. Lindsay is appropriately categorized among American academics, American foreign policy writers, American legal writers, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Writers on the Middle East, & University of Missouri-Columbia alumni, and probably more. Many otability (academics) |academics are single-issue people, and Lindsay's knowledge and opinions on his issue is unique, since he has been a participant; not an outsider.   There is no question regarding notability.  The way to improve this article is by expansion, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The article is a coatrack, and Lindsay does seem to derive his notability from one event, and there's no way he meets . That said, ynhockey makes a very fair point that this is ''precisely'' the sort of person with sufficient credentials, whose entry into a charged political debate makes it likely that people will be interested in him, and coverage clearly sufficient for  will emerge (it's currently borderline, IMO). We've clearly not heard the last of him, and enough material for a stubby bio exists. That said, the current article clearly needs to be pared down, and I think the suggestion of forking the content about the letter is a good one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: and/or redirect to UNRWA per . There's a small sourced factual core of the article (that he was general counsel for UNRWA) but this part does not support notability; the bulk of the article is a |coatrack for his criticism of UNRWA rather than being about him. I'm seeing this because of its listing on the deletion sorting list for academics, but I don't think he passes any criterion of : not #1 because his criticism of UNRWA is not an academic work and its impact is not academic, and not #5 because a think tank is not a research university
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:COATRACK||WP:PROF)

Comment: per David Eppstein -- not notable outside UNRWA issue, this is a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or '''Move/Merge'''. The guy wrote a report critical of a group, how many people have done that? , anyone? The material may be appropriate for Wiki in an article about the report or about UNRWA if its notability can be separately established.--Special:Contributions/75.2.19.152|75.2.19.152
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)