Deletion of Kesha's second studio album

Comment: another rash of 'Keep' votes based on the fact the article is big and there are lots of sources listed, neither of which is a Wikipedia rationale for keeping an article. As Bearian says, it clearly doesn't pass , it has no name announced, no idea of a release date and no definite track list. Basically its an article about 'things Kesha has been doing since 2011', so at best it should be |'''incubated''' until we know ''something'' definite. Looking at the current sources, they are almost all Kesha making brief statements about what she wants her next album to include. She's basically throwing a few juicy bones to keep the press interested. There is not much at all said by anyone else, for the obvious reason there is nothing definite to review or talk about
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:INCUBATE)

Comment: it might not pass , but does pass  with all the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:GNG)