Deletion of EDENext

Comment: Should "Article is about a European Union research project" be a criterion for speedy deletion by now?  I can't recall any of them that were ever really notable; and worse, all of them are written up in atrociously slanted but unintelligible bureaucratese prose.  This one purports to be about something interesting (infectious diseases) but the |non-neutral |bollocks of the text |takes great pains to conceal that all the project has on its menu so far is to plan to  have more meetings:  ''Due to environmental and economic changes, emerging diseases with zoonotic potential will be an increasing challenge for public health in Europe. The risks and the consequences triggered by vector-borne diseases for public health in Europe are just starting to emerge in the public awareness. EDENext is following a holistic, transdisciplinary public health approach towards vector-borne diseases. Sensible risk communication will be developed, based on scientific risk assessment on one hand, and taking into account public risk perception on the other.... EDENext intends to go further towards understanding the ecological and biological mechanisms that result in epidemics of such diseases. We will be placing strong emphasis on the social and economic factors that favour contamination, and controlling disease risk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:CB||WP:NONSENSE)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)