Deletion of Nichlas Vilsmark

Comment: I have to agree with the above comments - no significant coverage in the |third party sources. This project is not intended for promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THIRDPARTY)

Comment: The first delete indicates the subject is "about as notable as a florist could get". If the standard application of  leads to deletion, we are faced with the prospect of not having articles on florists, regardless of their prominence in their field, or to decide that, as stated at the top of the guideline, we should apply "common sense" and retain the article as one of the "occasional exceptions". There are third party sources given. There are also print sources, where significant coverage is indicated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)