Deletion of Market Post Tower

Comment: Passes  and is the subject of .  In slightly less Wiki-lingo, it is the in-depth subject of independent reliable sources such as the ''San Jose Mercury News'' http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SJ&s_site=mercurynews&p_multi=SJ&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB7269D14F3D633&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SJ&s_site=mercurynews&p_multi=SJ&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB72C19789312EA&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM, the core criteria of OTABILITY.  And according the the Australian newspaper ''The Age'', it houses the "world's best known Internet centre point, MAE West." http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/08/19/1029114069316.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: from nominator) I understand that Silicon Valley networking geeks (including me) see significance to this place.  But it doesn't fit the  or  requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia.  There are search hits and its own web page, but no reliable sources specifically about this topic.  And there's really no expectation that there will be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per improvements to the article which clearly demonstrate |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)