Deletion of The Man Who Never Lied

Comment: In three years I've seen the same nominations over and over again, the only thing that changes is the song (or in some cases "it never charted" but it has coverage like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D.S. (song) (2nd nomination)|D.S. or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speechless (Michael Jackson song)|Speechless). If the problem is , go and change NSONGS. What would happen if the fictional song "The Song" charts in 10 countries, but all of them in low positions, e.g. UK 190, US 120, Fra 99, Spa 95, Can 98, etc., and it received multiple album reviews and one or two independent reviews, and that's it. Should we discuss if it is notable? It charted, and as long as it is a requeriment to creation, it must be respected
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: per meeting criterion 2 of . I have trouble justifying the deletion of a well written, well sourced, non-spammy page. If this was a 3-liner I wouldn't consider the listing on the South Korea Gaon International Chart to be enough for a stand-alone page and would recommend a redirect or merge, but there is good stuff  on this page and it's not like Overexposed (album) needs to be expanded. So that is the thinking behind my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: Meets the relevant subject specific guideline just fine.  1. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)