Deletion of Little Kids Rock (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is fairly obvious, article passes  here are some , http://www.npr.org/2010/12/30/132444322/change-you-can-invest-in-social-entrepreneurship NPR, http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/08/beyond-baby-mozart-students-who-rock/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 NY Times, and http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/13/rock-is-not-the-enemy/ NYTimes source article (same author). There are more sources such as this http://www.bbc.co.uk/tyne/content/articles/2006/06/09/joe_satriani_interview_feature.shtml BBC. The DRV nominator should add these to the article, this should have never been deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Article cites no  sources and is overtly |promotional. But a quick Google strongly suggests the subject is in fact notable. This article needs major improvements though. On a side note, why do we have an AfD discussion if the nom is not presenting an argument for deletion? If a previous delete was overturned then it would seem the correct course would be to reopen the old AfD or ask the original nom if he/she wants to renominate the article for deletion. Anywho just my 2 cents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PROMO)