Deletion of Landship

Comment: The redirect idea only works for those entries that have actually been called a "landship" in their supporting reliable sources. Without that the remaining entries are . I see no evidence for any but the few, mentioned, above to remain
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: The article has been edited heavily since I nominated it, but the basic problems remain. Those of the new sources I checked either refer to tanks or do not mention the term "landship". There is no source provided that discusses the general concept of "a large vehicle that travels exclusively on land", a concept that is ill-defined (what's "large"?) and not shown to be independently notable. While it may be possible to establish notability of "large land vehicle" as an article topic, ''this'' article would still be |original research, particularly |original synthesis, top to bottom. It currently violates one of our core content policies, and none of the "keep" opinions addresses this problem or shows that it could be cured short of scrapping the entire page, despite the recent rewrite, and starting over from scratch. "" is an argument that should be given no weight. For bonus points, spot the blatant error of fact right in the lead
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:ITSINTERESTING)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' as described by EricR above.  AFACT, the only meaning of landship is as https://warisboring.com/evolution-of-the-landship/ here, which was an historical name for tanks, but everything else in the article is basically  and otherwise made up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as per above. The Churchill-era early days of tank development are AFAIK the only topic where that term is actually used, and it should redirect there. This article ''is'' an interesting production, but unfortunately the fundamental  structure makes it unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Not one mention of Simon Stevin in the article? There are some encyclopedic topics associated with "Landship": Prairie schooner and British tanks (''https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/landship Merriam-Webster''), and marginally related that Wikipedia may or may not have content for: Land sailing, {{google|"Simon Stevin" landship}}, The Land Ironclads. Is a DAB at this title most appropriate?  says not to do that.&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DABRELATED)