Deletion of Arthur Howell

Comment: Fails SIGCOV, SOLDIER.  Heck, there was a recent AfD where the keep vote hinged on a ''bridge'' being named after the subject, but in the (small) city where I live, there are bridges named after city councilors, a long-vanished United Spanish War Veterans post, and a 19 year old private who stepped on a land mine three weeks in country in Vietnam.  In any event, there is no notability standard on Wikipedia |for having a street named after you
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: lots of Australian MM deletions nominations recently with the same reason :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Percival Schofield, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Leahy (Australian Army soldier), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John William Cotter,  Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Harold Stewart which gives the appearance of this being part of series of  nominations.  Beside war service in WWI and WWII, theres the public officer for the town of North Fremantle, and the leading of a mass vaccination program to address regular epidemic. Perhaps there is better way to discuss this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)

Comment: No . The Military Medal article states over 100,000 were awarded, not everyone can have an article here, I'm sure there are plenty of military databases (including wikis) that can or already do provide coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The subject does not meet inclusion or notability guidelines. : ''"As explained in § Encyclopedic content above, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia."'' The article makes no claim to anything that would be notable. Fails the  portion of : the sources do not discuss the subject in depth. Same for .  shows this is a perfectly ordinary person, certainly honorable and hard working, but ordinary and not notable. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BEFORE)