Deletion of Evelyn Mase

Comment: per . - "Independent notability" is an ill-defined concept, and "notinherited" is an argument to avoid. What matters is that the person has enough direct coverage in sources to write an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PAGEDECIDE)

Comment: I agree that  is being overused as a keep argument and it's not a strong defence. However multiple high quality independent sources have decided that she is notable enough for them to report on her in her own right. We on WP may have a view that they are only doing so because of who her former husband was, but this is second guessing the independent source's motives. The sources exist, they comment in depth on her, they are independent and multiple. It's not our job to tell newspapers etc that they are mistakenly according her inhgerited notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: In consideration of precedent and consistency, though, identifying articles of the same nature that have been established and continue to exist on Wikipedia may provide extremely important insight into general notability of concepts, levels of notability (what's notable: international, national, regional, state, provincial?), and whether or not a level and type of article should be on Wikipedia."'' — 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)