Deletion of Adherer

Comment: Brownie, as it passes  with multiple mentions in reliable independent secondary sources, specifically the ''Celtic Age: Role-Playing the Myths, Heroes & Monsters of the Celts'' book and ''White Dwarf'' magazine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per BOZ. Don't bother with your  badgering
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:UNCIVIL)

Comment: all, as the "Tome of Horrors" from Necromancer Games and the Pathfinder "Bestiary" series from Paizo Publishing are indeed independent sources, and thus I believe they constitute sufficient independent coverage to meet the  despite the strident and repeated objections of the nominator. Additionally, White Dwarf is an independent publisher granting additional notability to the Brownie. Failing that, a '''merge''' to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters is a reasonable alternative. The nominator has used the results of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death watch beetle (Dungeons & Dragons) as an indictment to indicate that all fictional element articles related to D&D are non-notable and thus should be redirected or deleted, when in fact AFD discussions are not normative and all topics should be considered separately. Note that the majority of that previous discussion focused entirely on the Tome of Horrors as a source, and some of the responses concluded that it alone was insufficient; however, additional sources for these three turned up late in the course of the AFD, and I do not believe they were fully considered by most of the participants in determining the result. During the previous AFD, the nominator withdrew these three articles in good faith because of the additional sourcing found, and so the AFD's closer noted that they "are considered to have their nomination withdrawn". Despite this withdrawal, this AFD's nominator and
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)