Deletion of Wolf Mail (2nd nomination)

Comment: It's a badly made article, that needs some rewriting with proper formatting, particularly for references.  It has some highly misleading labels of "references", such as the "Rolling Stones" item, which is actually nothing of note.  But, I see some substantial coverage from independent sources.http://www.theaureview.com/interviews/wolf-mail-everywherehttps://rhythms.com.au/reviews/wolf-mail-above-the-influence/.  So, it clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)