Deletion of Smosh (4th nomination)

Comment: notability conclusively proven in the 2nd afd, see the links there for details. And as I pointed out in the last afd, that they haven't been added to the article is not cause for deletion. FYI- I removed the notaballot infobox for now. Given that nobody has commented in the afd before me, its probably best to |assume the good faith of anybody who wishes to comment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: This is really not a  violation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Many and sundry references, including one in Time Magazine, where the subject at hand is not only the primary focus, but ''the'' focus of the article.  This article has |no chance of being deleted given the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)