Deletion of March for Our Lives Portland (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is somewhat borderline, but I believe that the article has enough coverage to be kept. There is in-depth coverage on the March. Some of the in-depth coverage is local, but a lot of this type of coverage also exists at the state level https://www.opb.org/news/article/march-for-our-lives-portland-oregon-vancouver-olympia-eugene/. The Portland march also gets some light coverage at the federal level http://time.com/5210992/march-for-our-lives-protests-dc-nyc-chicago/, and is mentioned a lot in relation to the general march. As for duration of coverage, the http://www.wweek.com/news/city/2018/03/03/portugal-the-man-will-play-at-portlands-student-led-protest-against-gun-violence/ oldest source I found is from March 3. The most recent sources come from mid-April, and discuss the Portland March for Our Lives March in the larger context of state gun control efforts. For example, the article “We will Change the World” (Lake Oswego Review (OR) - April 20, 2018 Author/Byline: Gary M. Stein Section: Education) (use newsbank to view) contained a paragraph on the Portland March for Our Lives in a larger article about the April 20 walk-outs. Finally, this article is for all points and purposes a |spin-off of the main March for Our Lives articles. It cannot be merged back in without either lopping off a ton of encyclopedic information or causing the article to have an undue focus on Portland. I believe that letting the article stay as-is is preferable to outright deletion, or the problems that a merge would bring
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: meets ; sourcing is sufficient for a stand-alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)