Deletion of High viscosity mixer

Comment: High viscosity mixing" seems to be a notable topic, with chapters and sections in books like http://books.google.com/books?id=61c3_G_F1WUC&pg=PA169&dq=High+viscosity+mixing&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MXk0U4WFJILkoATQnILQDw&ved=0CEgQ6AEwATgK#v=onepage&q=High%20viscosity%20mixing&f=false and http://books.google.com/books?id=s4SsrmvEc7QC&pg=PA987&lpg=PA987&dq=%22High+viscosity+mixing%22&source=bl&ots=54Qribe6tS&sig=lpTCb0GOXteVF78RSzfeiEkABlI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XHg0U4-SHoH2oASdtoGACw&ved=0CHgQ6AEwCjgK#v=onepage&q=%22High%20viscosity%20mixing%22&f=false and articles like http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=10787. There are academic articles such as http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs003480050022?LI=true and http://www.bakker.org/cfm/publications/viscous.pdf. The article is a stub and needs development and sourcing, but these are surmountable problems, per . A notable topic and surmountable problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)