Deletion of Lucy Johnston

Comment: Sufficient coverage exists to pass , plus the amount of criticism directed at her is significant enough to pass  as well. The lack of biographical detail is irrelevent - reliable sources have written about her work, and that is enough for her to be notable by Wikipedia standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Satisfies .  BLP1E does not apply when  she has won  a 1998 commendation from the International Federation of Journalists for her  article "Barred from Animals Kingdom" http://www.ifj.org/default.asp?index=823&Language=EN as well as a 2001 'Genesis Award' from the Humane Society of the United States for her article on pharmaecutical companies, http://www.xenodiaries.org/express1.htm "Terrible Despair of Animals Cut Up in the Name of Research".  The Humane Society award being a deadlink does not make it not exist,. Does the nominator think it is a hoax? http://www.all-creatures.org/aro/nl-20010307-gen.html Indications are that her story in fact 2001 Genesis Awards Winners|a winner in 2001  at the 15th Annual Genesis Awards, "an international distinction that recognizes members of the major news and entertainment media for spotlighting animal issues with courage, creativity and integrity."  A career in journalism, including http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/01/6/petfoodAP0601.html  influential writings about animal research and animal abuse, capped by being http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/66053/Hollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jabHollywood-takes-on-the-MMR-jab health editor of the Express,  is by no stretch of the imagination "one event." A smoldering edit war, with criticism of her article "Jab as deadly as the cancer'" criticizing a cancer vaccine, and harsh condemnation of said article by a http://www.badscience.net/2009/10/jabs-as-bad-as-the-cancer/ "bad science" column being alternately added to and removed from the article, is not a valid reason to delete the bio article. Several books have some coverage of her work, https://www.google.com/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=jab+%22lucy+Johnston%22&num=10 per a Google Search, although the content is not viewable online and some may be false positives. The talk page of the article does not show a serious effort to establish a consensus as to what the article should say in regard to the "jab" article and the response to it from the journalism and science communities. There are certainly BLP issues, so protect the article and work via its talk page toward a balanced section on the article "Jab as deadly as the cancer,"  the backlash to it from journalists and scientists, and http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/134193/Cervarix-and-Dr-Diane-Harper-correction an apology of sorts and the removal of the story from the Express website
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)