Deletion of Daniel Hernandez Jr.

Comment: Passes . The sources in the article and those found by Wookiebookie support notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A very clear case of BLP1E. It's true that an aspiring civil rights activist who suddenly finds himself called a "hero" by the President may be a reasonable bet for independent notability in the future. But, per , that is not a valid basis for a "keep" vote
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BALL)

Comment: to 2011 Tucson shooting per . This is not, nor has it ever been, a major enough event to sustain an independent article on Hernandez, although he is a hero
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to 2011 Tucson shooting.  Clear case of .  He was not notable for anything before the shooting, nor anything after besides his role in the shooting
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: and '''Redirect''' the very basic details to 2011 Tucson shooting for now.  Continuing coverage of the single event is not a separate event, and he remains, |for the time being, just a part of that event.  The news cycle and media feeding frenzy for the Tucson shooting have ended and no further information is expected until the trial, so I wholly disagree that it's "too soon
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Strangely enough, I agree with the above argument that he doesn't fall under , since he couldn't really be regarded as low-profile. However, he does come under the loosely related guideline . Every piece of coverage found so far is explicitly about his role in that event, rather than really being about Hernandez himself, despite the inclusion of some biographical information. Maybe he'll become more notable in the future, but not right now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:ONEVENT)