Deletion of John Mordacq

Comment: While the citation impact suggested by http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22John+C.+Mordacq%22 this search (which replicates SarekOfVulcan's) is a solid one, it seems to fall a bit short of meeting  criterion #1. There is only one well cited pub, with 81 citations. Also, I could not find a full web page for him at Northwestern; is he a tenured full professor there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Subject's position of ''Distinguished Senior Lecturer'' at Northwestern might legitimately meet  #5.  Google Scholar references satisfying  #1 is debatable: one (moderately?) referenced paper (81 citations over 20 years), a dozen or so other papers with under 15 references.  Web of Knowledge public search comes up blank though.  Can't find evidence of other criteria.  I would only vote keep if consensus is to keep based on both  #1 '''''and''''' #5; otherwise delete.  If kept, this should be flagged for an expert in molecular biology to confirm notability and sift through the research: the current lack of detail is very troubling
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Just short of what is needed to qualify as notable under , as I noted in my comment above. Seems to be in a non-tenured lecturer appointment at Northwestern; may be affiliated with a research center there. Only http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22John+Mordacq%22 one news entry in Google News, which makes it hard to justify inclusion under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)