Deletion of Amir Massoud Tofangsazan (second nomination)

Comment: Muliple independent published works.  Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Withdrawn my Keep , due to  which this does not furfil and does appear to be accepted in principle, as per
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: for |biography of living persons considerations.  This may seem fascinating now, but in six months it'll be yesterday's news, and in ten years nobody will care except for the principals.  If I'm wrong, and it continues to be relevant somehow in a year's time, we can write the article then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Same vote as last time, after looking at the sources provided: . Strictly under , this article unfortunately passes muster. However, I'll apply the proposed  which is likely to gain consensus in a form that would support deleting this article. Even in the absence of , common sense indicates that we are not a directory of news stories, and if we have to cut off minor news stories this is a good place to start. The argument that the sources focus on the event, not the person, is also a good argument for not having an article ''at this title.'' Having said this, if this event happens to be discussed in an article describing its historical significance (if there is any), its significance to the study of Internet memes, etc., I don't think I would object to including the information in those kinds of contexts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:LIVING||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per NY Brad, Makemi, Rossami, etc. A case of unremarkable people and unremarkable events. Please leave playing journalist to the people on Wikinews. I entirely agree with Doc Glasgow that articles on living people where "alleged" or its variants need to be employed to explain the "notability" of the subject should be speedily deleted, probably under G10. There's no deadline, and we can easily wait until allegations become facts, or not as the case may be, before publishing. It does a great deal of harm, to us and to the subjects, to include this egregious -ignoring eyesore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: To say that there are no |BLP concerns at all is to ignore the plain wording of that policy.  The question remaining is whether those concerns are outweighed by other considerations.  In this case, I do not consider them to justify the continuation of this page.  It is a hostile page written about a person who is at best semi-public and who has not apparently taken any steps to put himself into the public eye.  This is a trivial little spat that got some column-inches on a slow newsday.  Wikipedia is not WikiNews.  The argument that we have to keep it because "it's an internet meme" also utterly fails to convince me.  This has no place in the encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)