Deletion of KISI

Comment: This is the classic attitude of startups thinking they can gain notability by using Wikipedia as a B2B platform. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: typical thin page for a company abusing WP for promotion. Not a WP article. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: With respect to the comment above by {{User|B3rn1b01}}, ''PR Newswire'' pieces are press releases and invalid for assessing notability. Also,  that exists on Wikipedia has no bearing on this article. Bottom line, notability for KISI has not been established. Per , we need in-depth coverage of the company from reliable sources that are ''independent'' of the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: An article about a company supported by typical start-up coverage about the firm's aspirations and funding. There is a recent review of their product https://www.business.com/reviews/kisi/ but neither that nor anything else foudn in searches indicates that the firm has achieved |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Although a Keep !voter above points to https://www.reportlinker.com/p04603873/Access-Control-as-a-Service-Market-by-Service-Deployment-End-Use-Application-Region-Global-Forecast-to.html this report by "ReportLinker", there is nothing to indicate who wrote the report and Reportlinker, the company, does not attribute either itself, or a reputable research company, as authors of the piece. As such, based on what I can find, it cannot be considered reliable much less as meeting the criteria for establishing notability. In fact, nothing in the article provides any reasons or indications as to notability. Another run-of-the-mill early-stage technology company. Fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)