Deletion of Dalton Maag

Comment: weakly.  This is a business that makes computer typefaces.  The references supplied are either to directories of similar businesses ("MyFonts" website; ''An A-Z of type designers'' book reference), in-passing mentions ("Making typefaces for publications or corporations has become the staple for companies such as Dalton Maag in London"), or attempts to create |inherited notability (one of our typefaces was used by somebody famous).  I looked and did not find anything better.  I don't see any of this as meeting the |general notability guideline, much less the |business specific one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: The article has been significantly improved since this nomination was made but while there are now references, they are passing mentions of the company or an employee, not the on-point coverage from reliable third-party sources required to prove notability. I would be quite content for this article to survive if that basic proof that this is a notable company per  is provided
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY)