Deletion of Luc Langlois

Comment: per  as the past president of the Canadian Philosophical Association
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: This discussion page was created without the {{tl|afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log.  Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself at this time.  {{ping|Sintiya}} If you wish to nominate other articles for deletion in the future, please fully follow the procedures at .  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: on the balance of things. In addition to the above points, there's a plausible pass at  with books published by university presses
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Although his citations do not indicate that his ideas have been so influential, Dialogue appears to be a well-established journal, and he appears to have been co-chief editor.  That looks like  C8.  The  C2 argument also looks solid.  Beyond that, I find the C6 argument pretty plausible, and his citations (while not a C1 pass) are not bad
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF)

Comment: There appears to be at least a decent argument for #C2 (the Ordre des Palmes académiques), #C6|#C6 (past president of the Canadian Philosophical Association) and #C8|#C8 (http://dialogue.acpcpa.ca/en/ Francophone editor of ''Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review|Dialogue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: I don't think the case for #C1 or  are strong, but C2, C6, and C8 all look like passes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)