Deletion of Harlow skatepark

Comment: WP:COI|COI, sort of) - tough one. The local council lists the park as one of their http://awards.themj.co.uk/library/media/pdfs/Best%20Achieving%20Council%20submission%20Harlow%20Council.pdf top achievements of 2011 and continues that theme http://www.harlow.gov.uk/about_the_council/council_services/community_and_customer_service/big_society/what_have_we_done_so_far_pt_2.aspx here. That said, I would imagine any council would say similar things about any new recreation infrastructure, and the reference obviously couldn't be considered "independent". http://www.finchampsteadsk8.co.uk/page7.htm This site from a group campaigning for their own park cites the subject as a "near-ideal skate park" but you'd have to question whether that could possible be considered a |reliable source. Probably not. There's been plenty of coverage in local papers (note; they refer to it as the ''"Harlow Town Park"'' but it's the same thing) - http://www.harlowstar.co.uk/News/VIDEO-SLIDESHOW-Hundreds-enjoy-SX-Urban-Games-in-Harlow-Town-Park-02082011.htm here and http://www.harlowstar.co.uk/News/Urban-sports-event-returns-to-Harlow-29072011.htm here as examples. On balance, I think there's probably (just) enough to justify keeping it, but I won't lodge a "vote". It just so happens that I'm mid-way through an effort to "revive" ikiProject Skateboarding|WikiProject Skateboarding which may or may not be considered a conflict of interest. Maybe not, and other Projects actively encourage participation at AFD, but a "weak" vote wouldn't add much to consensus anyway. Regardless, I am happy to commit to re-writing the article if others think it's worth saving
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:W)