Deletion of David L. Leamon

Comment: I think Mr. Leamon more than meets the criteria in .  He has played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work or collective body of work (multiple Libraries significant enough for you?) which have been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles, and he personally has been the subject of multiple independent periodical articles as well.  Additionally, his work has become a significant monument within each community, 2 of his libraries have won significant critical attention and are internationally significant both architecturally and for the services they provide.  If you go by the academic standards, he is repeatedly quoted in newspapers or newsmagazines , has appeared on CNN and is widely regarded as a significant expert in his area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article has expanded some and accumulated citations since being brought to AFD.  The references are from two newspapers, but the set from one newspaper are not accessible, which is why I append ''Weak'' to my support.  Assuming Good Faith, I would say that the subject passes the first  criterion of being the subject of multiple secondary sources (I count the 6 articles being from 2 secondary sources in this case - which is why  is needed).  Having a part of a building named after you satisfies (weakly) satisfies a second of the  criteria - receiving a significant recognized honor; people seek out having wings of buildings and rooms named after them as persistent marks of their influence. --User:Ceyockey
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AGF)

Comment: Although I'm sure he's greatly contributed to a local community, I see no way how this fulfills 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)