Deletion of Dusty Springfield's legacy

Comment: This seems more like a Dusty Springfield Trivia section than an article.  Virtually nothing is cited.  First sentence indicates this thing is lifted from a larger work.  Existing Dusty article is very solid and exhaustively cited; trying to merge that article with this uncited list just because some list entries are |interesting could weaken the existing article, and hardly seems worth the effort
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INTERESTING)

Comment: any reliably sourced content to Dusty Springfield#Legacy. That section could afford a little more content, and this is a plausible search string and redirection will take readers to exactly where the information is. This is ''not'' to be interpreted as a '''keep''', per the essay-like content, the duplication (sans sources) of much of the information in the Dusty Springfield article, and the |WP:original research/synthesis concerns (although I can see the possibility of a Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard|WP:HEYMANN-like improvement if someone is willing to put effort in to restructure this as a valid sub-article of Dusty Springfield and |reliably source the content
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)