Deletion of James Wearing Smith

Comment: Subject may be notable but current article is mostly supported by unreliable sources, and has a lot of spammy external links.  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: A search of the Australia & New Zealand Newsstream database (all Australasian newspapers), via Pro Quest, which is a much broader and deeper search tool than Google, found zero results, which was a first for me. That, coupled with the clearly suspicious circumstances of the page's creator's user name ie ; the arguments he presents above, including that there is a social media campaign to keep this page; the highly suspicious 'keep' votes that provide no reasons made by IP address accounts; and the denial that he is not the subject in the face of the overwhelming evidence is persuasive. The page does not appear justified
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: fails  and . Simply no independent reliable sources other the reports about his court case. Take out the iMDb refspam, the blogs, and the primary sources where Mr. With discusses Sylvester Stallone, his TEDex talks and his car, and there is nothing of substantial value
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACTOR)

Comment: not notable, IP's claims dont appear to be verifiable, though they would have potential to warrant an article.  The creator of the article appears to have  based information at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:James Wearing-Smith V.jpg
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)