Deletion of Aircraft systems

Comment: As it stands it makes very little sense to me (aircraft engineer/pilot). The title would be valid for an overview article using |summary style format. What is missing is a parent category to round up all the aircraft system articles, I could create that and also work on the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: There are no grounds for a nomination and I am sure that it is faulty.  Per  and , a reasonably thorough search for sources is expected and it is apparent that this has not been done as a quick browse immediately finds entire books on the topic including ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Design_and_Development_of_Aircraft_Syste/zwnBDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Aircraft+systems&printsec=frontcover Design and Development of Aircraft Systems'', ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stability_and_Control_of_Aircraft_System/BbrWcY3eBhwC?hl=en&gbpv=0 Stability and Control of Aircraft Systems'' and ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Introduction_to_Unmanned_Aircraft_System/fDjNBQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0 Introduction to Unmanned Aircraft Systems''.  This appears to be nothing more than a cursory and incomplete |drive by.  See also 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NEXIST||WP:DRIVEBY||WP:IMPERFECT)