Deletion of Web 3.0 (second nomination)

Comment: I cited Marc Fawzi when I (re)created the article (unaware that it had been previously deleted). The article was then speedily deleted - then restored to my userspace, and to its own.  People then started editing it.  I don't understand what is to be achieved by deleting this article, or why some are so keen to kill it.  As long as  and erifiability are met I think there is a clear case to keep the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:V)

Comment: as a |neologism, possibly |salt unless the term becomes more notable. From what I can find, it's just a buzzword. Quite a few irrelevant Google results
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:SALT)

Comment: The article has to meet  but the existence of so many posts and articles are proof that the term merits an entry on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Can't find anything to prove this term meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)