Deletion of Ida Carmelitta

Comment: Most of the articles are well written and sourced and with multiple independent sources they meet . I also note that the nominator has not informed the original authors of the articles about this mass AfD, which I think is a breach of courtesy. Please note in the interests of full disclosure that the nominator was recently a party in this RfM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Allegations_of_mass_graves_at_Chemmani and also this  RfM Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Sri Lankan Civil War where at least one of the article authors was also a party. While I think it's admirable that you are going through a dispute resolution process and I don't know the history and if/whether you have had a conflict with the original author - this AfD doesn't look very good right now. One last  point (my soapbox not yours), the more appropriate coverage Wikipedia has of important non-English speaking, non-white, non-First world topics - the better for the project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:SOAP)

Comment: Both of you seem to have missed the reason of this AFD. I did not dispute whether or not the the incidents took place or whether the articles are |verifiable. The reason for this AFD is that all the individuals fail . Apologies for seeming crude here, but simply becoming a rape victim does not make one notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. In this case, none of these individuals are notable for any other reason. Most crime victims will have a multitude of items of news coverage of them, but that does not make them notable. With these articles, practically all the  sources provided, be they the BBC or whatever, simply report on the incident taking place, and not on the actual background of the victims. Go through the articles and you will find almost no personal information on the subjects of the articles (birth dates, family information etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: The nominator stated above that the articles should be deleted, not per , but per . While it is true that none of the ''victims'' are notable by virtue of anything besides their being victims of human-rights abuses, it can be argued that the eponymous human-rights abuse ''cases'' are notable in themselves. (And it seems reasonable for articles about individual cases, as opposed to massacres, to simply have the same name as the individual in question, e.g. Ida Carmelitta rather than 1999 Ida Carmelitta rape and murder case in Sri Lanka or some similarly awkward title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)