Deletion of Miscarriage of justice cases

Comment: Notable, verifiable, objective criterion, not indiscriminate. I don't know how Shadowjams can seriously contest that there are ''no possible NPOV criteria for entry''. If someone would like to use the article's talk page to explain where the POV enters in terms of alleged cherry-picking of cases and POV pushing in the descriptions, |this can be fixed - it's not an argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: I find this one difficult to decide. Obviously miscarriages of justice are notable by any definition, but how can this ever become a comprehensive, or if not that even a representative list. This is a case where  and  collide. By including only verifiable cases we are excluding nearly all of the miscarriages of justice carried out by, for example, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, apartheid South Africa, the Peoples Republic of China, the Pinochet regime in Chile etc, not to mention what went on before the last century. Because of the very nature of these regimes most miscarriages of justice haven't been reported by reliable sources, but by excluding the non-verifiable cases we are presenting a very unbalanced picture of where most miscarriages of justice have happened
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV)