Deletion of Habit body

Comment: The current article is a  essay, crossing . Notice that on Talk:Habit body, the author complains that Wikipedia is not providing protection for "new useful ideas", indicating some confusion about the Wikipedia's role. (I note also that the author of one of the cited books "Your Habit Body: Owners Manual" has a domain name matching the account name of the article creator.) But whatever the quality of the present article, the further question is whether normal editing could result in a more suitable article, and whether the concept is notable? In this respect, one might point to its usage in Merleau-Ponty (not mentioned in the article but visible in Google Books); so may there be a salvagable article on this topic
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (:WP:SYNTH||:WP:NPOV)

Comment: This is 100% pure 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: At least in this form, purely the |fringe theory of Bruce Dickson, who has written (and self-published) a surprisingly large number of related volumes.  I don't think any of this is strictly a copyright violation from Dickson's works, but there's not really any question where it originated.  And third party sources are entirely lacking.  Maurice Merleau-Ponty's use of the term was something rather entirely different (and isn't mentioned in his article, so a redirect doesn't appear necessary at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: This page is just a violation of  And therefore should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:OR|Original research. Wikipedia is not a |webhost for essays
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WEBHOST)

Comment: WP:OR,  or blog
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)