Deletion of Redlands Mall

Comment: Not an appropriate rationale for deletion (see ). Re: sources -- aside from the usual flood of local coverage, a few minutes of searching finds https://inspire.redlands.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1200&context=gis_gradproj this academic study, http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-outthere17-2008oct17-story.html this article in the ''LA Times'', and discussion in {{ISBN|9780738528830}} and {{ISBN|9780738559018}}. Certainly enough to at least merge. Either way, this shouldn't have been at AfD in the first place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Just having only a single source is not a good thing, but it's also not necessarily a reason for deletion. What's going to determine whether this article is kept is going to be probably whether the mall is considered Wikipedia notable enough per . Right now, a source citing the sale of a local mall is probably not enough to establish notability. A Google search does find things such as https://www.redlandsdailyfacts.com/2017/06/09/redlands-mall-overhaul-unveiled-heres-what-the-city-developer-have-planned/ this, https://www.pe.com/2017/01/04/council-agrees-to-sell-redlands-mall-parking-lots/ this and https://www.sbsun.com/2014/07/23/redlands-mall-has-been-sold/ this as well as other articles, etc. but I'm not sure if that's enough per DEPTH or it it's still too . It probably would be a good idea to post a :Template:Please see at :Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Shopping Centers to see if editors used to working on this genre of article can provide any feedback
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORP||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:AUD)