Deletion of 2017 America East Men's Soccer Tournament

Comment: I think the above keep votes have some weight, I'll look for more independent coverage. Still a tad unsure of the tournament's long term coverage or if it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sources clearly indicate significant coverage of the tournament. I too am concerned that this is a  nomination. There are plenty of sources. Knock it off
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I really don't understand why you are applying  to this, this comes under , also is the competition competitive or friendly, and where does it sit in the ladder, American soccer seems to do my head in sometimes for being so poorly organised
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: ping|Sir Sputnik}}, with all due respect, how many citations to relevant, third party links are you looking for until you vacate yourself from the 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I'm relatively new to this whole process, so I don't really understand why this was closed in the first place. Those advocating delete aren't really citing (or at least linking to) any Wikipedia policies that state why the sourcing is inadequate and what is required for the article to be notable. Could somebody clarify this? I too worry that the nature of the arguments made leans more towards  rather than actually making arguments against the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: and '''create-protect''' 2018, 2019 and 2020 titles to save us from another AfD next year and for the following reasons: 1. Generally there is insufficient ''content'' and ''sources'' for both the Tournament and the season every year 2. The America East Conference Men's Soccer Tournament|parent article itself has lingering {{tl|onesource}} tag, ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/814750552 removed after this comment). There's insufficient content to write meaningful article and (in my analysis, even |notability concern). '''3'''. The Tournament page has been repeatedly created every year and every year get deleted, '''|it is just not notable''': * 2011 America East Men's Soccer Tournament; *2012 America East Men's Soccer Tournament; * 2013 America East Men's Soccer Tournament; *2014 America East Men's Soccer Tournament; *2015 America East Men's Soccer Tournament *2016 America East Conference men's soccer and now  this year 2017. There is also intention for creating it next year as infobox of this has shown. '''Note that''' All these past versions where deleted via full AfD not speedy or PROD. In addition, after AfD deletion of the season 2016 America East Conference men's soccer season it was recreated record 3 times  until the title was salted to sysop-create only. Even after that it was recreated with varying letter case and later redirected. I believe it is time to save editors' time and indefinitely sysop-proctect creation for at least 3 years to come. I have no doubt nothing will change. Because |Notability cannot be created where it exist not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:AMOUNT||WP:AMOUNT)

Comment: let's actually provide reasons for supporting a deletion, instead of a  argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE)

Comment: I feel universally at this point there is |NC (fair points from Quidster and Ravenswung both for and against), if the final call is Keep, that's fine and I wouldn't have any further comment. '''However, if the consensus manages to swing towards delete, we should instead consider to redirect''' to America East Conference Men's Soccer Tournament, because it's a Wikipedia:Search engine test|plausible search term, but perhaps (I say this from an arguendo perspective), not plausible on its own
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:NOCON)