Deletion of Kreuz Oranienburg

Comment: fails to assert notability in line with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: nbsp; Nominator states that this intersection is just like thousands of others, yet given the map in the article and some , I think that this is not something that a reasonable person would say.&nbsp; A quick look at some references, and I've found that www.massdot.state.ma.us/Portals/8/docs/designGuide/CH_7.pdf page 7-14 states, "Interchanges with loops in all four quadrants are referred to as full cloverleafs and all others are referred to as partial cloverleafs."&nbsp; So the interchange under consideration is a form of a partial cloverleaf, and I for one cannot say that I've ever before seen one like it.&nbsp; I also looked at the talk page and see that the nominator has not tried to engage in a discussion about the |alternatives to deletion |before binding the time of AfD volunteers with an AfD nomination.&nbsp; I'll incorporate by reference all of the comments I made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:UCS||WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE)