Deletion of Stardance project

Comment: per nom, no reliable sources, no article, giving it not a |snowball's chance in hell of inclusion in the encyclopedia.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: I always feel nervous going against a snowballing consensus, but i feel this case was glossed over and not investigated far enough. The "attempt to bring" was apparently misleading, because this project was covered by two small yet reliable unrelated sources (http://www.canada.com/m)ontrealgazette/news/story.html?id=dabc159d-a2c7-47a5-9aab-cee580604217 The Montreal Gazette via Canada.com, http://dalnews.dal.ca/2007/12/10/stardance.html Dalhousie University), and two days ago (per those reviews) the pre-production was supposed to be done aboard a Zero_Gravity_Corporation|Zero-G Corporation aircraft. The article is poorly written and makes this seem like entirely speculation, but I believe otherwise. Tag as expert, unreferenced, and cleanup, perhaps, but I think this project shows notability. If someone can show me specifically which part of  this fails, I could be convinced to change my mind
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)