Deletion of Goodbye Marie (2nd nomination)

Comment: First off, I frown any time I see a renomination from a previous keep vote...even more so when it's by the same nominator. Secondly, policy '''was''' cited in the previous AfD, per . As it states, "''Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable.''" This song has done two of those things. It was ranked at #17 on the Hot Country Songs|Billboard Country Chart. Later, it was covered in Kenny's #1 ranking album. And even after that, when it was finally released as a single, it ranked yet again at #47. I think that's impressive enough to keep the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: The nominator complained that there was no policy discussion in the KEEP decision from the first nomination. That's untrue because there was plenty of discussion there about notability for a charting single. Meanwhile, the nominator has said that the article should be deleted because it will permanently be a stub.  states that an article ''could'' be deleted for this reason, but it also states that some stub-class articles can be kept simply because there isn't much else to write about. There is a similar decision to be made at  criterion #2. Those are two judgment calls that might kill a lot of articles, but this song charted and therefore has some notability under  and related guidelines. And by the way, the chart guidelines do not contain the phrase "terribly low-charting" as a criterion for making a decision on notability. If you don't think #17 is high enough, explain why
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:BEFORE||WP:NSONGS)