Deletion of Natacha Merritt

Comment: Like Joe Chill, I'm not a fan of her work and I wouldn't give her the time of day. But that's neither here nor there -- other people have, as the sources listed in the article and by Joe Chill clearly show. (Also, a number of other sources are behind pay walls.) She meets , and saying that the sources are trivial sounds a bit like . As to the claim that the book isn't notable, Wikipedia:Notability (books) says a book is notable if "the book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience." The book has been reviewed in ''The New York Times'', ''The Los Angeles Times'', and ''The Guardian'', among others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The 's provided by Joe Chill have been incorporated into the article.  It still needs to be expanded but the groundwork has been laid.  She is clearly 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)