Deletion of The Avro Vulcan Adventure

Comment: Article of its own right fails notability, whilst it may have some merit as interesting trivia, the odd occasion it was impressed to transport people in an emergency is not evidence of a casevac role.  The rest of the information is already in the Vulcan article.  Would people please read  and cease shoe horning edits into the Vulcan article that have no place there.  Over the last couple of days I've seen several editors shoe horning edits into the article that aren't written as per  and are solely designed to add this book as a ref.  Again this is againts .  Please stop
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:MOS||WP:MOS)

Comment: Whether or not this book is good or not is irrelevant. Because this book fails , it should not remain an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There is no indication that asserts the notability of this book and every indication that this article is essentially nothing more than marketing. To be more clear - this article does not meet Wikipedia's otability|notability policy in that there are no reliable third party references cited. Without those the article fails the notability test and must be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Those look like the same search results I got - I don't think that any of those links are the kind of coverage needed to meet  as they're online bookshops and discussion forums. If you can find some professional reviews and the like in there I'd be happy to be proven wrong though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)