Deletion of PlaneShift (video game)

Comment: The ohloh sites main point is "Ohloh Analysis Summary" that's them saying THEY looked at it and verified it, think of it as a seal of approval. Also you just said there are 2 sources that fully meet the  the others can be questioned i suppose, although how can you prove that they were submitted by them? the ones with C&P text can be proved that way, the rest please inform me of how you know. Also what about the google talk's invite? while the talk itself was done by a developer the invite was not, as such google seems to think its notable. Again on warcry check the author "Thomas -Mystery- Valley posted on 29 October 2003 3:52 am" look at his other articles, not submitted by PS or AB. Also your lack of access to TUX does not make it non-notable you have to prove that its not a notable source. Also web3d.org and csc.com are secondary sources, even if they use primary sources to get some of there information. If they are not secondary sources, then there is no such thing. Everything gets its information from primary sources, then gets read and regurgitated by secondary sources. --Special:Contributions/76.90.200.238|76.90.200.238
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: AfD has been canvassed on the game's forum http://www.hydlaaplaza.com/smf/index.php?topic=37121.0 here. |Meat Puppetting may occur
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEATPUPPET)

Comment: I personally confirmed that the TUX magazine has significant coverage of the subject. I don't have a direct link to the article but you can take a look at its text http://www.hydlaaplaza.com/smf/index.php?topic=26664.msg300786 here. The review by Linux Magazine Spain (http://www.linux-magazine.es/issue/18/Planeshift.pdf(http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http%3A%2F%2F74.125.113.132%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3APV7fWBQKdJAJ%3Awww.linux-magazine.es%2Fissue%2F18%2FPlaneshift.pdf%2Bhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.linux-magazine.es%2Fissue%2F18%2FPlaneshift.pdf%26cd%3D1%26hl%3Den%26ct%3Dclnk%26gl%3Dus%26client%3Dfirefox-a&lp=es_en&btnTrUrl=Translate translation)) appears to be acceptable. There is also this overly excited http://linux.about.com/od/softgame/fr/fr_PlaneShift.htm review on about.com but it's not clear whether it can be considered a reliable source (e.g., see eliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 27#About.com|RSN/Archive27). The rest of the links on :PlaneShift (video game) and rticles for deletion/PlaneShift (computer game) don't show significant coverage of the subject by independent S|reliable sources. According to the Linux Format's admin, their coverage of the subject was fairly limitedhttp://www.linuxformat.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=51384&sid=628a3572c60833a234fdd61321528d80
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:A||WP:RS)

Comment: I see there is some coverage on gaming websites, including a few news article's, and i don't doubt the 500.000 player claim which indicates this is at least more then a kitchen project. However, searches don't come up with anything that i would normally accept as a reliable source. For something in development 6 years already it received quite little press coverage. It would seem to be |notable enough, but it lacks |verifiability. Ill remain neutral for now, as i simply cannot decide if the amount of trivial coverage, awards and game size outweigh the lack of any "Real" references
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)