Deletion of Piwik PRO (2nd nomination)

Comment: Ignoring the COI for a minute, I can tell you that I would not have approved this through AfC even if the creator had submitted it there. I cannot see any coverage out there that would add up to . What is available is brief mentions, general announcements, and press releases. It may be notable in the future, but not at this time. I should note that I also checked for references associated with Clearcode and found nothing that could be used there either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: the article creator transparently disclosed a conflict of interest on their user page (thank you), but drafts from connected contributors should be reviewed through the  process before publication. The current sourcing is still far from sufficient
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)

Comment: Sources limited to press releases and rewritten press releases, mostly reporting business as usual (new company secures funding, etc.).  spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES)