Deletion of Alicia Wade

Comment: or '''Rename/Refactor to''' an article on the kidnapping, rape and trial with a different name that isn't just the name of this victim. ()  There is some lasting coverage, much of it highly charged, but some serious stuff too. (e.g., possibly the first and third results, books via Springer, at http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Alicia+Wade%22+rape&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=) There's a fair letter-of-policy argument that the refactored article would pass .  But I'd prefer deletion.   gives us wiggle room in our assessment of marginal BLPs, and I'm going to also invoke my less-than-annual application of  to suggest that both the encyclopedia and the victim, might be better served with deletion--this article will continue to attract a fair bit of agenda-driven attention, and if we keep it (even refactored), I'm guessing it's going to be a drama magnet and a BLP vio magnet. Is this event truly notable enough to make it worth that trouble? I'm going with "no
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:EVENT||WP:BLP||WP:IAR)

Comment: fails  standards. That doesn't mean it could not be fixed, but we should not keep this hanging around while we gaze at our navels, it makes very serious allegations about identified individuals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)