Deletion of BreakTudo Awards (2nd nomination)

Comment: it is incredibly suspicious that there is not a ptwiki article on this topic.  Also, many of the references in the article are press releases and/or broken.  While the awards certainly exist, their own self-promotion seems to overwhelm any neutral coverage.  The ''Keep'' votes are all from editors who are almost solely contributors in the "Latin American music" topic area; this could be because they know more about the notability of this event than the rest of us, or it could be that they care less about Wikipedia policy on reliable sources and notability.  My question is: what are the best  sources here?  Preferably references that are not press releases, not celebrity gossip sites, not blogs or Youtube videos.  Also a comment on the television situation would be nice; as far as I can tell the "broadcasts" are just Youtube streams
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: Rather than wade through all the sources in the article, I googled "BreakTudo Awards", "BTD Awards Brasil" and "BT Awards Brasil" (searching the latter two without "Brasil" threw up page after page of false positives). Of the four{{sic}} pages of results for "BreakTudo Awards", precisely one was more than a non- listing or announcement of nominations or results - https://jornaldebrasilia.com.br/blogs-e-colunas/analice-nicolau/breaktudo-awards-2021/ two paragraphs in :pt:Jornal de Brasília, a seemingly-reputable local newspaper in Brasilia - and even they read like a press release. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NEVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Absolute  nonsense. Delete and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:SALT)

Comment: Although the article is |bombed with references, the reliable sources seem to be purely covering Blackpink winning an award a few years ago.  The case for notability for the award seems a bit weak to me from this; I'm balancing that with the  case per the possible sock, refbombing, and other concerns expressed by other editors above.  The keep !votes above seem to be making a  argument-to-avoid.  I'd reconsider my !vote in the presence of a solid 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB||WP:TNT||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:THREE)