Deletion of HTML Refresh Language

Comment: Notwithstanding the author's desire to promote his product, it still doesn't make the cut for notability. We need multiple, non-trivial sourcing for the article to stay. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Please follow the reference to the IETF archive entry for the draft in question. This is the IETF's own storage of drafts so addresses the issues of  and . This article was added as an adjunct to the history section of the Ajax (programming) article to provide a complete picture of alternatives that exist to that strategy. As for "blatant " I again point to the reference to the officially saved IETF draft which means the the only source for this article about a computer language is on an internationally recognised organisations web site and not on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:COI)