Deletion of Helena Ekblom (2nd nomination)

Comment: meets  and , article is already |well sourced, more mentioned above, |lets all go out and play in the snow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SNOW)

Comment: Does not fail , does not fail , plenty of sources available, some listed in the article or mentioned here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Nominator badly misunderstands our criteria for deletion if they think "no sources proving notability on the article" is one of them.  It is not; see .  Furthermore, "no Ghits that prove notoriety either" is also not related to notability.  Finally, based on nom's comment above about adding "a request for citations and more content" it appears that they ought to read  before making any more such misguided nominations.  Oh, also, this article has https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena_Ekblom existed on the Swedish WP since 2005 and they ought to know, right?  That is, after all that, KEEP per Ymblanter.  Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN||WP:DINC)