Deletion of International recognition of South Sudan

Comment: with the discussion of which is more appropriate left to the talk page. This really should have been handled there |instead of bringing it here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: This is a clear case of ecentism|recentism and should be |handled accordingly - wait until the news spike falls off, then do a comprehensive rewrite. Since the bulk of the information in this article is trivial, the rewritten content should fit snugly into a section of the Foreign relations of South Sudan#Diplomatic recognition|foreign relations article and, eventually, the History of South Sudan#Independence|history one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:10YT)

Comment: I think a number of the keep arguments run into aspects of  in particular
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)