Deletion of Shawn Baldwin

Comment: the references already in the article demonstrate notability, but the article as it stands doesn't come close to satisfying , and needs some significant editing to make it suitable for Wikipedia. I've tagged it as such, but am unlikely to have time to work on it myself in the next few days
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: clear vanity page for somebody with no indication of  notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Although this discussion is filled with many sockpuppets, Shawn Baldwin is notable. See http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-84212955.html this article from ''Black Enterprise'', http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5253/is_200706/ai_n20203358/ this article from Crain Communications, http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070611/REG/70607004/1036 this article from ''Financial Week'', and http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/2003/08/01/346509/index.htm this article from ''Money Magazine''. These sources prove that Baldwin passes , so this article should be kept. Cleanup and tone issues are not valid reasons for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)