Deletion of List of gender reveal party accidents

Comment: as very few incidents, if any, would satisfy the criteria for . Also Wikipedia is not the news|WP:NOTNEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)

Comment: Per , gender reveal party accidents, like most other accidents, are not notable, and this article only exists as it has become a fad to sensationalize them. This kind of thing can get a mention in gender-reveal party#Incidents and injuries and that's all it needs. The keep rationale by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SENSATIONAL)

Comment: This list article is an excuse to detail every non-notable mishap at a gender reveal party, which is not discriminate: "Information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful. A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject" (). None of these people will be notable () and none of the individual events will be notable (). Much of the reporting is low-quality sensationalism, which we should not use (). There already is a section in Gender reveal party regarding incidents that can be used to appropriately ''summarize'' the problems with these events; appropriate sources for that section are pieces that discuss the general issue of gender reveal parties going wrong, not those which only cover individual incidents. With this article we are immortalising - indeed ''mocking'', with the link to Darwin Award - a traumatic event in the lives of PUBLICFIGURE|non-public figures. We are an encyclopedia, not a pillory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BIO1E||WP:EVENT||WP:SENSATIONAL||WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: Just because a major news outlet mentions past ones when reporting a recent one doesn't mean there is |significant coverage of this as an alleged topic. Doubly so if the source is trying to push a narrative about gender reveal parties
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: BLP issues can/should be dealt with by removing names in the articles I have gone ahead and removed all non-notable names from the list which should take care of BLP issues. Passes  as news outlets have covered this as a trend. As per , none of the categories of articles detailed in the policy actually apply in this situation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Reporting on such accidents from gender-reveal parties seems to be a years-long theme of news media. to the point that there are now articles on the general theme of such parties ending in misfortune, sometimes including their own lists (e.g., https://abcnews.go.com/US/death-wildfire-plane-crash-gender-reveals-stay/story?id=66974758 1; https://patch.com/us/across-america/gender-reveal-party-disasters-continue-2-dead-month 2; https://safer-america.com/5-accidents-caused-by-gender-reveal-parties/ 3; https://mashable.com/article/worst-gender-reveal-party-fails/ 4; https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2019/11/09/here-is-yet-another-gender-reveal-mishap-a-plane-crashes-in-texas/?sh=6ed062af334d 5). Just the ''New York Times'' coverage alone is considerable: "Explosive devices used at gender-reveal events have been linked to at least two deaths since 2019 and two major wildfires" it noted https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/22/nyregion/gender-reveal-explosion-ny.html this week, after asking "Are Gender Reveals Cursed?" https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/10/style/gender-reveal-parties-cursed.html last year, after saying, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/us/gender-reveal-plane-crash.html the year before that, that "a plane crash could be added to the list" of gender-reveal parties that "have ended in calamity". While each singular event may not be considered notable, surely the concept of "gender-reveal parties as a general cause of accidents" is. {{u|Crossroads}}, you say that this "Fails ", but don't say why. Reading through it, it seems crystal clear that gender-reveal-party accidents have with extreme frequency been "discussed {{em|as a group or set}} by independent reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)