Deletion of Ursula Reinstein

Comment: Citation counts (on Google Scholar under author:U-Heczko) not enough to make a convincing case for #C1 and there seems to be nothing else. Being first author on the cover story of a journal issue is certainly not a significant enough honor by itself for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Sorry to pester. I don't have a vested interest in the outcome of this discussion either way, but I'd like to point out that I believe keeping this article on the grounds of  would be an unusually broad application of that guideline. The guideline is most commonly used to justify keeping or creating articles on professors whose work is highly cited (as a proxy for highly impactful). While Ursula Reinstein is an author on several papers, that work is not highly cited. Also she was not an independent researcher at the time, but was either a graduate student in Martin Reifinger's lab, or a Postdoctoral researcher in Brett Finlay's lab. To consider someone notable under  entirely for work done under the supervision of other scientists would be highly unusual. Or at least it's not something I've seen before. If we consider this level of academic impact to meet |the first NPROF criterion, then we should consider clarifying this at  as nearly all professors at research universities and many postdocs will have a similar number/impact of publications. Also, having your work featured on the cover of a journal does not necessarily indicate unusually high impact (which is why we use citations as a proxy for impact instead). Last thing, {{ping|AuthorAuthor}} you mention meeting ; I couldn't find any independent sources that substantially cover Ursula Reinstein. I may have missed some that cover her maiden name? Could you elaborate on why you feel she meets GNG? Thanks. Sorry for the long message
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Her discovery was on the cover of The Journal of Infectious Diseases, it quite a notable scientific achievement obviously.  Scientists are notable by their achievements, they don't do interviews and get written up in popular news media.  Wikipedia isn't just about popular culture, its educational as well.  She meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: per nomination, since subject does not meet  #1. As
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: I found only six publications authored by her on GS as part of a research group. Some decent citations (which is all that counts for notability) but not nearly enough to pass rof#C1 in this very highly cited field: oo soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: Does not have enough citations to pass  #1, the only one that would be relevant. I find no other coverage of her at all, so nothing to meet  either, sadly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Found more than a dozen publications via Google Scholar authored and/or co-authored by the subject under her maiden name (Heczko), easily meeting . The subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)