Deletion of Toradex (3rd nomination)

Comment: The article has been updated with new notable links  taken from Electronics Weekly, Electro Pages, EDN, PHYS, EECatalog, Shab.ch (Swiss Govt Site) etc.  Moreover, many company, PR, and blog links have been replaced with media coverage links.  The article content has undergone extensive rewriting to now include more citations during the 2nd AFD with no space for advert. With this  Strong Keep You can vote only once
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:NPOV||WP:EP)

Comment: I agree with nom - everything I looked at was either directly from the company's site, a press release, or an article that took most content verbatim from the press release. There is clearly a lot of pressure to keep this article on WP, and the main editor appears to have a COI. The sources, numerous though they are, are not ones that would confer notability as per . Note that links to this article have been created in various WP articles so some cleanup around this company page will be needed if this article is delete. For reference: Computer-on-module, Pico-ITX, Tegra, Computer module, XScale. On some of these, Toradex was introduced by adding an unnecessary photo to the page with Toradex in the caption
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: the article doesn't even mention the company's Apalis standard which has enough sourcing available beyond the already  sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)