Deletion of Maliban

Comment: Meets  and has significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: http://businesstoday.lk/article.php?article=6639 is in-depth, but really, it reads like a press-release or company's own history write up (and is businesstoday.lk a reliable source?). Ditto for http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110605/Fh/fh01.html, the publisher seems possibly notable (The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)), but that's not the same as reliable, and the quality of the tiny paragraph speaks for itself. Both articles are highly promotional: "Maliban, Sri Lanka's premier biscuit manufacturing company, celebrates 50 years of quality, taste and successful commercial operations this year, thus marking another milestone in the company's rich legacy." is the opening of the first, or the ending of the second "this philosophy of using the best quality raw materials and ingredients in the manufacture of Maliban products has been practised unchanged". Actually, the second source is clearly attributed to "This is a statement made by the present CEO Mr D Lakshman Weerasuriya." so it is pretty much a press release (the first source is unattributed, and I'd be surprised if it wasn't written by the company's PR dept, too - the last paragraph ends with attribution of a quote to "U Keerthie Adasuriya, CEO of Maliban"; at the very list it is a very poor excuse for journalism).  is an issue, but it doesn't absolve content from requiring RS and so on. Standards are the same for all companies. The company got the "National Quality Award" but is the award notable? Sadly, I am leaning delete here, as I am not convinced  is met. The closer should consider the strength of arguments - a lot of them are sadly , ,  (that one specifically discusses systemic bias fallacy in notability arguments) and so on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMICBIAS||WP:NORG||WP:ITSIMPORTANT||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:LOCALFAME)

Comment: there are sufficient independent/reliable secondary sources to clearly establish that it satisfies  and . Maliban is the second largest biscuit manufacturer in Sri Lanka and has won a number of national and international awards (see http://www.dailynews.lk/2019/08/29/finance/195343/maliban-biscuits-honoured-national-quality-awards and http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/Maliban-becomes-only-food-company-to-seize-World-Class-Award-at-APQO-Conference--121142.html). I believe that the nominator hasn't really looked hard enough before putting this article forward at AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCOMPANY||WP:GNG)

Comment: have added further  to the article. Noting that national newspapers such as ''The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)|The Sunday Times'', ''Sunday Observer (Sri Lanka)|Sunday Observer'' and ''The Daily News (Sri Lanka)|Daily News'' are all considered to be highly reputable newspapers - it would appear that some editors have a  in not accepting foreign published newspapers as being notable. The awards that the company has won are both national and international - which is clearly not . As previously stated the article satisifies , in that it demonstrates significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SYSTEMICBIAS||WP:LOCALFAME||WP:NCOMPANY)