Deletion of Everstone

Comment: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: There are some references that mention the company but none that meet our criteria for establishing notability. References which rely substantially on interviews fail . Likewise details which are copied from the company website or PR fails  and/or . Topic fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The https://www.livemint.com/Companies/TByiSkqvNTg3J3SMsC4UIL/The-building-of-Everstone-Capital.html Mint article is quite substantial; while based upon an interview IMO is more of a feature article, and does start to build a case for notability. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/everstone-is-bullish-on-platform-deals/article22141961.ece Business Line is a simple interview. I haven't been able to find any other coverage with any significance - lots of trivial mentions in PE announcements, corporate activity, etc. Overall, there isn't significant coverage to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)