Deletion of Oxford Portraits in Science

Comment: I've now spent some time searching, and have found no evidence that the whole series is edited by the Harvard University astronomer Owen Gingerich, or that the series is in any way notable. Gingerich is listed in the ''Media Review'' reference as "General Editor", but OUP don't note any editors for the other books in their web pages I've looked at. OUP produces an immense number of series, just follow the links in the sidebar to the left of http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/series/OxfordPortraitsinScience/~~/Ym9va0NvdmVycz1ubyZwZj0wJnByPTEwJnNkPWFzYyZzZj1hbGwmc3M9YXV0aG9yLmFzYyZ2aWV3PXVzYQ== this list. Remember #Wikipedia is not a directory|Wikipedia is not a directory of non-notable lists of series of books by publishers. What's still needed is a reliable third party source asserting that this is notable as a series, and my research found nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per .  List is not notable; each book in themselves are not notable, notability hasn't been established in third party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: unless RS is found establishing notability of this series per . If individual books or authors are notable, they should have their own entries - the series should onlt have an article if a significant number of the books are notable or it itself is notable per . Oxford and author notabilities are separate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE)

Comment: I forgot to put in a comment in the template, so here goes.  This is merely a list of books.  This fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)