Deletion of The Superior Human?

Comment: Non Notable fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Actually not quite so "clear", specially as documentary films have it far more difficult than do big-studio, major studio blockbusters... and here we have a tongue-in-cheek Australian doc film.  But looking beyond the addressable issue of an article using poor sources, the authored  review in ''https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201204/the-superior-human-who-do-we-think-we-are Psychology Today'' is fine under , but we'd need more to meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:RSOPINION||WP:NF)

Comment: Be ware of Wikipedia:Systemic bias. Below are quotes from  that are most relevant to the film. The film easily meets  for having multiple notable people
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NF)