Deletion of Acting under a description

Comment: Not because I don't believe Amerywu but because I think it veers too close to , and will for the foreseeable future. Detailed metaphysics probably need to be discussed in their author's articles until they break out into a separate field themselves (e.g., post-structuralism), or the concept is discussed uniquely (e.g., Dasein). I don't see that happening here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: It does read like an essay to me, and I'd say it does breach  and  in its current form, as it includes a lot of personal judgment and opinion, rather than referenced statements made by notable people. Both of the references are links to other Wikipedia articles, neither of which mention the term "Acting under a description" (other than as a link back to this article) - it's perhaps a bit strange that the G. E. M. Anscombe article doesn't mention it. There are Google hits on the term, and I think it is a notable concept and a proper article could probably be written about it, but this one seems to be completely the wrong approach and I think "Delete and start again" would be the only practical way forward, as what we need is an encyclopedic article that describes only what other notable people have said about it, and no actual synthesis - if others haven't written such material, Wikipedia is not the place to start
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)