Deletion of Jean A. Stevens

Comment: that Stevens ''does not qualify'' as .  To do so, she would have to meet "each of three conditions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Primary (LDS_Church)#Chronology of the general presidency of the Primary. The article has taken a direct hit from a  but the significant coverage is still around the single event. It's obviously possible to turn passing mentions and (repeated) quotes into an article, but that doesn't transubstantiate the original material into significant coverage. Redirection is a reasonable alternative to deletion, and {{u|Redditaddict69}} had a good suggestion for a redirect target, which is unfortunately hard to find in the discussion above, so I repeat it here for emphasis: Primary (LDS_Church)#Chronology of the general presidency of the Primary, which already has information on the subject
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: per nomination, since subject distinctly lacks |verifiable |notability and is (little) known for |saying a prayer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPERSON||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Well, three of the keep !votes above do not address the very core basis of the nomination, that this is a '''''' situation whereby the subject is notable only for '''one event'''. One keep !vote states one's own made-up rules regarding BLP1E, erroneously stating that  is somehow not applicable unless an event article already exists. Additionally, this nomination is ''not'' based upon  or , but the three mentioned !votes above are addressing the nomination as though it is (e.g. "there are sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)