Deletion of Luminara Unduli

Comment: Coverage of the ''subject'' that exists is brief, tangential and shallow.  It isn't the extreme example of "trivial" offered in the footnotes to  but it isn't far off.  I don't think that this article cites significant coverage in independent sources, failing .  But as there are some citations and some out of universe coverage, there is hope for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: as notable, unorigninally researched |fancruft. Erik the
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)