Deletion of 2004 Jalna Mosque bomb attack (2nd nomination)

Comment: Editors need to actually ''read'' the sources. Passing mentions are not synonymous with |further analysis and there is no indication of a |lasting impact. I think there is a confusion between quality |indepth sources and finding any news piece that briefly mentions it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:LASTING||WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: another non-notable incident that fails  and . Sources provided above were only initial reports that basically plagiarized each other, and such random incidents occur a lot. Per  we need much more than that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nominator. Fails  and it was only reported initially and has ended up with nothing interest that it warrants a separate article like Marvellous Spiderman notes, i.e. fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LASTING)

Comment: failure of . There is clearly no reason why this article should be kept, it has still not gained any notability despite it occurred so long ago
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: per ,  and . News and book searches show that this attack was and still is widely covered in India
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:LASTING)

Comment: This incidence was mentioned in a https://www.newsone.tv/editors-choice/lest-we-forget-samjhota-express Paksitani newspaper literally this year (2017). The mention may be passing, but keep in mind that it has been over a decade. I feel that still satisfies , especially since it "acts as a precedent or catalyst for something else." This was the first in a series of Hindu nationalist attacks in the years following such as the https://www.dawn.com/news/695646 2007 Samjhauta Express bombing. The concerns about  seem reasonable though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:BLP)

Comment: the fact that the accused were acquitted does make throwing a bomb at a house of prayer a non-terror act (either by someone else who wasn't accused or reasonable doubt) - and in any event terror/non-terror status (or the number of victims) of the alleged incident is not a factor per  and  - what matters is whether there are lasting and persistent sourcing. In this case, we have some - https://books.google.co.il/books?id=YsL-7mlzEY8C&pg=PA108&dq=Jalna++mosque+bomb&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiw4cyqnazXAhXLI8AKHVQlA0QQ6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=Jalna%20%20mosque%20bomb&f=false https://books.google.co.il/books?id=zZaHAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA143&dq=Jalna++mosque+bomb&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiw4cyqnazXAhXLI8AKHVQlA0QQ6AEIOTAD#v=onepage&q=Jalna%20%20mosque%20bomb&f=false https://books.google.co.il/books?id=BxUGnN8wKCkC&q=Jalna++mosque+bomb&dq=Jalna++mosque+bomb&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiw4cyqnazXAhXLI8AKHVQlA0QQ6AEIQjAF https://books.google.co.il/books?id=TkswAQAAIAAJ&q=Jalna++mosque+bomb&dq=Jalna++mosque+bomb&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj3ktPqnazXAhXoKsAKHZM3DIQ4ChDoAQgzMAM https://www.tni.org/en/article/saffron-terror http://www.jstor.org/stable/40278200?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents http://www.jstor.org/stable/4416163?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents http://www.csss-isla.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Native-Terror-Factories-1.pdf. The acquittal may be relevant in terms of removing of the BLP names currently in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:GNG)