Deletion of Byron Stigge

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by  and fails to state a reason notability should be presumed in lieu of sources under .  Sources offered are overwhelmingly  or just plain trivial (e.g., the wedding announcement).  I agree with nom that the award is not sufficiently significant to confer notability.  Subject might qualify under  but a Google scholar search turned up only a few papers, none of which received more than 6 citations.  (As a general rule, a significant paper would be one with over 1000 citations, so this isn't even close.)  I was unable to find anything helpful on the web or in books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:PRIMARY||WP:ACADEMIC)