Deletion of Humans of Bombay

Comment: no indication of notability. fails . Just a promotional article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I think it is clear , i.e. {{tq|Independence of the ''author'' (or functional independence)}} and {{tq|Independence of the ''content'' (or intellectual independence)}} are met, especially without any specific objections raised to any of the sources. In addition, there are  that are reliable, offer  {{tq|analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas }}, including ; in addition to , the source assessment table helps show  notability is sufficiently supported for an article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:MULTSOURCES||WP:SECONDARY||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:GNG||WP:ORG)

Comment: All the references provided here do not pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Per , {{tq|This page gives some rough guidelines which most Wikipedia editors use to decide if a form of web-specific content, being either the content of a website or the specific website itself, should have an article on Wikipedia}}, and per CRIT, {{tq|web-specific content3 may be notable based on meeting one of the following criteria: The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations4 except for media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site5 or trivial coverage ...}}, which may be why the related Humans of New York article exists. But it seems more relevant for this discussion that there are multiple, non-trivial published works independent of the website itself, as noted in my comment above, and per , {{tq|When evaluating the notability of web content, please consider whether it has had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education.}}  To review sources per the applicable guideline, I offer the following source assessment table, with an emphasis on the significant and demonstrable effects of the website on culture, society, entertainment, etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEBCRIT||WP:INHERENTWEB)