Deletion of Peter Steinmetz

Comment: Despite being the originally person who accepted this draft, I agree with {{u|Jbhunley}} on this one. I originally accepted the draft thinking that the subject passed , but I have been only able to find https://health.ucsd.edu/news/releases/Pages/2014-06-16-hippocampus-and-memory.aspx one source (independent of the subject's own website) that even mentions his neuroscience work and several that mention his run-ins with the law. Even then, as JBH mentioned, he was acquitted {{redacted}}, so he probably wouldn't pass  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: He might pass . See https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=qfU98b8AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra this Google Scholar page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: His academic work, based on citation count, does not look sufficient to pass NPROF and I can not find anything beyond bare mentions in media nor do I see anything which would fulfill the other NPROF requirements. For instance the sources I removed were nothing but one line mentions. They were useless for anything beyond saying his name had been mentioned in the newspaper - and that was all they were used for. I found one other where he evidently testified before a city council on allowing people to shoot guns loaded with rat shot inside the city limits but nothing that would be useful re |the general notability guidelines. {{pb}} He does have some significant coverage re his criminal charges but he was acquitted so  and  also are against having an article although the case itself may be significant enough for its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:BLP1E)