Deletion of Dog (programming language)

Comment: to Sepandar Kamvar. Interestingly, there are news articles on the language, for instance, http://www.technologyreview.com/news/429544/new-programming-language-makes-coding-social-apps-easier/ new-programming-language-makes-coding-social-apps-easier, but the ones I found seem more like press releases. Nonetheless, this seems to be a case of ; there are no sources I could find that describe the language in any detail. The main website http://www.dog-lang.org/ http://www.dog-lang.org has an email sign up for future announcements and nothing else. When the language is released and multiple reliable sources can be found, I have no problems with this article being recreated. In the meantime, merge and redirect to the language creator's page is a reasonable course of action. It may be useful to note that there is already a DOG programming language, described at http://esolangs.org/wiki/DOG, which is also an attempt at a natural language approach to programming
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: This was AfD'ed within 12 hours of article creation. Big Y trout to the nominator  8-(  There was no excuse for this. Crap gets speedied, not AfDed. For anything that a nominator thinks might be AfD fodder, the least they could do, merely out of deference to a new (under a month) editor, would be to wait a few days and see how an article under active development turned out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)