Deletion of Zego (insurance)

Comment: Admittedly, the company is relatively well known in its space. But it doesn't meet . The best sources we have we TechCrunch, Business Insider and a passing mention in the Financial Times (quite literally one sentence in an article about something else). TechCrunch isn't usually accepted for notability, per discussions on RSN. I'd say Business Insider is kinda meh for notability too, although at a glance I can only find discussions on reliability. But either way,  isn't met. Article reads like promo and appears to be is the product of UPE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NCORP)

Comment: fails , , and . If this is paid spam, they were robbed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: It has received some coverage: https://www.fintechmagazine.com/insurance/insurtech-profile-zego-insurance-made-simple its coverage from FinTech, https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/2020/05/161491-uk-insurtech-zego-expands-partnership-with-rsa-to-launch-flexible-insurance-for-fleets-of-vans/ its expansion of partnership with RSA, https://www.verdict.co.uk/life-insurance-international/news/insurtech-zego-drover/ its collaboration with discover, https://thefintechtimes.com/zego-licence/ being the first tech company to have its own insurance license and https://www.pymnts.com/news/investment-tracker/2019/zego-insurance-startup-gig-workers/ its funding. With these reliable sources, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)