Deletion of K. Surendran (politician) (3rd nomination)

Comment: That is a lot of press coverage for one person even if individually not . I'd say the bio passes  and  and is notable. While I would generally apply , I can also see that there are the exceptions and this is one of those
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Per prev nom., the whole bunch of URLS seem to be only trivial coverage indeed. {{u|Padavalamkuttanpilla}}, please stop accusing other editors of not having 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: u|Tayi Arajakate}} said the facts I also wanted to say. There is no doubt that the subject fails . He also fails  because I cannot any references in the article giving him the independent in depth coverage to pass the notability criteria. All the sources are about him being appointed as his party president, some controversies in which he was  a major subject and some polling datas from the assemblies he contested. {{tq|If we are about to keep this article, we should have a new policy for Indian politicians. Otherwise, keeping this article without doing as per above would definetly be against our current notability criteria on politicians}}. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: It is indeed true that he has not won any legislative elections and hence the natural inclination would be to delete - however,  also covers figures who have received significant press coverage - and hence keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: while the coverage identified by Goldsztajn is news reporting rather than biographical profiles, in my assessment it does comprise significant coverage. Glancing at the actual article, I am skeptical that so much detail could possibly be  if this is the level of coverage that exists.signed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE)

Comment: per  and - the President of a large party is considered notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV)