Deletion of MUSH (e-mail client)

Comment: mdash;I have dim memories of this software from back in the day, but I'm just not finding the |reliable sources that would justify an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: a couple of things here.  First, please dont be discouraged.  You've picked a tough topic to contribute on, |verifiability is going to be tough to meet.  The USENET posts you  cite above establish that the software exists, but doesn't address notability concerns.  USENET posts are going to be treated like blog posts for purposes of determining their |reliability.  Unfortunately those are not reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Hi. The article has very little in the way of |verifiability, too far from enough. We cannot even verify if it is created yesterday or indeed has been around since before "WWW" (world wide web?) |Notability guideline compliance is at zero. I have no prejudice against userification or re-creation when secondary sources were found and notability was established. Best regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: I posted these potential  at
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)