Deletion of PureVPN

Comment: Remove from the list of sources all of those that make money from that review and we do not have something that meets . Explore the links a little more -- they're affiliate links. That's part of why VPNs and other similar services get so many reviews -- it's not just consumer interest; it's kickbacks. Could they still be neutral reviews? Sure, but how can we tell? If there's an affiliate link in there, I don't think we can consider it independent. Eastmain above specifically referenced MacUpdate and PCMAG. https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/52417/purevpn# MacUpdate is... far, far, far from acceptable. Far from an "in-depth review from a reliable source," It's basically a copy/pasted list of features from the company itself. https://www.pcmag.com/review/350623/purevpn-for-android PCMag has, bigger than everything else at the top, the logo and three affiliate links. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Most of the references are to industry-specific publications, so fail .  The article itself if just a listing of trivia factoids.  For example, "Manual setup installation guides are available on its official Support platform".  If somebody felt the need to mention that in an encyclopedia article, that's an indication of just how little there is to say.  Most of the rest of the article is generic descriptions common to all VPNs.  There's a VPN that provides end-to-end encryption?  Really
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)

Comment: It initially twiggesd my mind ... ''PureVPN''  ... I ''think'' I've heard of that before (but I could equally be mixed up with something else).  It seems to have large market share and has sustained but the choices for the reception section may not be neutral (and they were sloppy, no access date, not archived, url's swapped, one probably non neutral, not sure if the other (CNET) had actually reviewed from using the product rather than taking info from the website).  Other reviews https://www.techradar.com/uk/reviews/pc-mac/software/utilities/purevpn-1325640/review techradar 2018, https://uk.pcmag.com/vpn/4500/purevpn PCmag 2018 https://www.comparitech.com/vpn/reviews/purevpn/ comparitech, https://thebestvpn.com/reviews/purevpn/ The Best VPN (2019) (possibly not RS and possibly negative POV) perhaps paint a more balanced picture.  So it seems there are about 78 VPN products and we not would expect a wikipedia article for each.  That said PureVPN has , has about 2000 VPN servers (About 3rd or 4th  here),  and is headquartered in Asia so an article may well be warranted.  But it really needs to be beefed with a few more details and  probably needs to be tagged or to be sorted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per . Thanks {{U|Rhododendrites}} for the excellent expose of the poor quality sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: per  and .  There is nothing about this company or their article, beyond the basic concept of a VPN, that is at all either technically significant, commercially significant or WP:Notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:NOTDIR)