Deletion of Reid Hazelton

Comment: the entire article is basically |unverified editorial sourced to race results. That's not how Wikipedia works. If we actually included those facts that can be verified by those sources the resulting article would violate . There are whole sections (''"Kautz's Honda power and superior aerodynamics seem to have been the deciding factor up the hill en route to the checkered flag"'') which are pure |original research. There are a couple of instances of coverage (like http://www.scca.com/events/news.cfm?eid=5680&cid=51586 this and http://eformulacarnews.com/news_info.php?n=12108 this) but they aren't exactly what we would consider |reliable sources - news reports from various races. I can't see how the subject passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails .  Being a professional, in any field, doesn't give automatic notability.Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)