Deletion of Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics

Comment: WP:TOOSOON for  and no evidence of -level in-depth coverage in independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALS||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON, basically. Can be revisited once notability is actually established. The composition of the editorial board, or the notability of its published is irrelevant per  &#32
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Nobody says that this is not a serious journal, but at this point we |don't even know whether this is going to survive. And Scopus et al. only include a journal after it has shown too have some impact, their equivalent of our "notability". As this has only just started, there are no sources indicating any notability. This needs to be deleted and once (if ever) notability is clear it can be re-created, we don't do that the other way around
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: This is a serious peer-reviewed academic journal published by a university press with an excellent editorial board. The reason that it is not indexed by resources like SCOPUS is that they ''never'' index journals in their first few years of operation. (I know this from my editorial experience with several journals.) A supermarket novel |passes with two reviews in trade review rags but an academic journal has to jump through hoops
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: it's well-sourced and reputably produced. It passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: All indications are that it's a legitimate enterprise, but without indexing in a selective database or in-depth coverage by secondary sources (say, if it had an innovative funding scheme or peer-review system that attracted attention), we don't have grounds for an article |yet. 21 papers is actually a very small number of papers as far as academic publications go, and we'd need many more than the handful of existing citations to them to argue that the journal is influential
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)