Deletion of Norse mythology in popular culture

Comment: as a #DIR|directory of loosely associated topics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: this is a closer call than most. There is more here than a list of cross-references; there seems to be some claim as to how the mythology was "reintroduced" - I've heard other versions mostly in the context of LOTR, but nothing pinned to es.  So I'm inclined to accept the topic as encyclopedic.  However, what are needed are es to back the facts.  The standard for deletion based on lack of sources is that after some search, sources cannot be found. This AfD is the clarion call to the editors, find sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: List of loosely associated topics, fails #DIR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Entirely unsourced and violates #INFO.  Every small mention of any Norse god, myth, or story ''is'' indiscriminate as well as unencyclopedic.  I think it is also important to point out that many of the keep reasonings above utilize . There is no reason to keep this article based on Wikipedia policy and/or guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:USEFUL)