Deletion of Pathological skepticism

Comment: Although well-sourced, nothing here can survive  and/or .  Delete and re-create as a stub, if still desired.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:BLP)

Comment: The issue is not whether the term exists nor whether the term should exist but whether we have enough information to write a  and  compliant article. As for the comment about the SSE- the SSE is somewhat on the fringe of things
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Marcello Truzzi was a highly respected Professor, at Eastern Michigan University, who wrote many articles on the subject. The subject is verifiable from reliable sources. The phrase "pathological skepticism" is verifiable in a number of other sources, http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Pathological+skepticism%22&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Pathological+skepticism%E2%80%8E%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search, as is pseudoskepticism,http://books.google.com/books?as_q=&num=50&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_oq=pseudo-skepticism+pseudoskepticism&as_eq=&as_libcat=0&as_brr=0&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_drrb=c&as_miny=&as_maxy=&as_isbn=http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=+%22pseudo-skepticism%22+OR+pseudoskepticism&btnG=Search. Wikipedia #Undue_weight|NPOV Undue Weight tells us that  "None of this is to say that tiny-minority views cannot receive as much attention as we can give them on pages specifically devoted to them. Wikipedia is not paper." It is not against Wikipedia policy for an article to be "POV", only if the article is non-NPOV which is not the same thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)