Deletion of Comparison of HTML5 and Flash

Comment: We already have Adobe Flash and HTML5. What this  adds to that is comparison material that is far from being as well-sourced as it should be. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.250|202.124.73.250
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY)

Comment: Notability was clearly established in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HTML5_vs._Flash|last year's Afd and |notability is not temporary. As Lambiam said in that discussion, "merging the content of this article into a specific choice between HTML5 and Adobe Flash would give the comparison unduly localized prominence." Afd is not for cleanup: delete the original research. There's a lot of well-referenced content. Participate in discussion to reach neutral POV. What does the eventual resolution of the conflict (i.e. Adobe backing down) have to do with the topic's relevance? Flash isn't gone, and the comparison still belongs in its own article for now. If Flash ''were'' gone, maybe it could be moved there instead, but let's not write history before it happens. Thinking from an historical perspective may be useful, though: it's clear that the article doesn't need so much detail about performance, for example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)