Deletion of Mariano Lagasca

Comment: Gscholar  turns up enough on him e.g http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/7240?idioma=es, to show he passes the GNG, with works specifically or largely on him, no necessity for  citation counting and the like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Searching Google includes many citations, such as http://www.jstor.org/pss/1218855 this (if you're like me and  don't have JSTOR, you can only see a little bit in a Google preview) of his works.  Seems to have been what today we'd consider a prominent and well-published scholar.  Notability should often be treated differently for long-past subjects — we don't often run into the problem of people adding articles promoting people or groups that have been gone for 150 years like we do about contemporary people or groups.  Yes, this was created in violation of a ban, but I don't see deletion of this otherwise valid article for that reason as helping the encyclopedia, so let's |overlook that for now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: appears to meet  due to the citations.  I'd argue he likely passes  as well.  The article should probably be expanded as opposed to deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Really quite notable. Cited moderately in scholarly works, and he was the director of Real Jardín Botánico de Madrid. It appears from the Spanish WP article that there is a statue of him there. Meets the  guideline without breaking sweat. A definite keeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)