Deletion of Adnan Ghalib

Comment: per nom at the moment, because this article doesn't require inclusion in an encyclopedia just yet because it's a blatant violation both of  and #NEWS - for precedent, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Delaney as an example of something with many news sources, but nothing to incidate any long-term notability for a person. And since relationships do not transfer notability, there's nothing to suggest that the outcome of this case has to be any different. I do think that he warrants a one-sentence mention in Britney Spears, though - and nothing more right now. Wikipedia is not a tabloid or a celebrity gossip column
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT)

Comment: This person has the the in depth subject of multiple independent sources including ''People Magazine'', ''The Daily Mail'' and many others. http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20168997,00.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=509343&in_page_id=1773 http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Adnan+Ghalib%22&btnG=Search+News, the core criterion of both  and .  Speedy deletion is out of the question.  The  essay (not policy or guideline) that the nom quoted does not apply to those that in fact are the subject of secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BIO||WP:NOTINHERITED)