Deletion of 2014 banker suicides

Comment: Wikipedia is  and as for any "correlation" - that is far from proven
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: From what I've seen in what I've read, this is just a bunch of media sensationalism, loosely connecting suicides that have happened all over the place with the one common similarity of bankers. I'm not sure if it is notable. Something to remember: "Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage." , , and probably fails notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: Cleanup is necessary - bobrayner is correct in the fact that it has problems with neutrality. I now agree with UnifiedLeft that the topic is indeed notable enough to deserve an article, as per   However, that makes the status of the article no better. If the article remains unedited or unfixed, then at least a temporary withdrawal of the article is called for until it can be adequately repaired
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . There are insufficient reliable sources to establish the intersection "2014" and "banker" with "suicides" as a culturally significant phenomenon, such as can be found for the suicides that followed the Wall Street Crash of 1929, seasonal effects on suicide rates|seasonal effects, and gender differences in suicide|gender differences
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This deletion discussion is the target of a anvassing campaign http://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/21ft55/the_censors_at_wikipedia_are_attempting_to_delete/ on Reddit
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: fails #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  as stated above.  As Feedintm pointed out, as well, even the number of news articles being used as sources are are not necessarrily sufficient as signifigant coverage.  Special:Contributions/64.183.45.226|64.183.45.226
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: It is perfectly reasonable to strike a second !vote from the same user. Try Reading 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDFORMAT)