Deletion of Rohit Vyasmaan

Comment: Notability is not in question, because there is coverage in:http://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/02/nyregion/two-unlikely-allies-come-together-in-fight-against-muslims.html source http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/may/26hindu.htm source http://www.outlookindia.com/fullprint.asp?choice=1&fodname=20080818&fname=GSeema+Sirohi+(F)&sid=1 source http://www.tehelka.com/story_main20.asp?filename=hub101406the_discreet.asp source http://books.google.com/books?id=wT8wAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Rohit+Vyasmaan%22&dq=%22Rohit+Vyasmaan%22&as_brr=0&pgis=1 source http://samaj.revues.org/index262.html source.  The fact that the article has had no sources in the past 6 months is down to laziness, not inherent non-notability.In my opinion this nomination fails  because the nominator has clearly not bothered to look for sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)