Deletion of Vegansexuals

Comment: Clearly violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Agree with Matticus.  I did a news search:  http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news;_ylt=A0WTTksQzq9GuQIBHQTQtDMD;_ylu=X3oDMTBlM21mM3ZrBHNlYwNwYWdpbmF0aW9u?ei=UTF-8&p=Vegansexuals&xargs=0&pstart=1&b=11&fr=moz2&xargs=0&pstart=1&b=1.  This is a very new term, coined in one place and, if anywhere, it would belong in Wiktionary. Also #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: though I should point out I found another source at http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=29&art_id=nw20070731062543843C978189, so it may at least satisfy  to some extent. However, it doesn't appear to be in wide usage, so I can't see it becoming anything more than a dictionary definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)