Deletion of Accidental diplomacy

Comment: This appears to be an attempt to create a neologism rather than document the creation of one.  The article claims this is a term coined by Politico, but the article from there doesn't seem to do that. After the headline, the article does not use the phrase, and only uses the word "accidental" once, in the opening sentence – "an act of apparently accidental U.S. diplomacy". The writer isn't committing to declaring it definitely accidental, let alone attempting to define a new term.  This isn't just a |neologism, it's a neologism that isn't created in the place the article says it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS, , . (what is this English you speak of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:OR)