Deletion of BuddyTV

Comment: The topic certainly passes  criteria, as well as . Here are some sources comprised of significant coverage from reliable third-party sources, including: http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/TV-fans-this-online-service-wants-to-be-your-1200481.php, http://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/TVGuide-com-operator-buys-stake-in-BuddyTV-1245137.php, http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/26/buddytv-iphone/, http://www.forbes.com/2007/07/30/buddytv-community-gemstar-tech-cx_pco_0730paidcontent.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm sorry DreamGuy but I have to agree with the "keep cabal" on this one. 3 of the 4 sources provided by Northamerica1000 look |kosher to me and unlike ,  doesn't require non-local |supersources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:CORP||WP:WEB||WP:42||WP:42)

Comment: Certainly doesn't meet  criteria with current citations (definately has an issue with Wikipedia:NOTRELIABLE#cite_note-5|Wikipedia:NOTRELIABLE. Colenel Warden's book finds are interesting but more likely make BuddyTV a candidate for merging with Social media and television along with Ology and other TV commentary sites rather than having it's own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)