Deletion of Lord KraVen

Comment: I did some searching and other than a few mentions here and there (mostly in relation to his tiff with Jennifer Hudson), there isn't any true coverage for KraVen. He has received some coverage for his fashion, but it's  in scope and doesn't show the depth of coverage that we need. As far as his filmography as a whole goes, none of the roles are large enough to count per . They're all fairly trivial and aren't considered to be the type of thing that would merit a keep on that basis alone. Being an extra or being asked to come into a local TV channel to talk about the Grammys isn't enough by itself to give notability- the unsaid thing about having notable roles is that it's assumed that the individual will receive coverage in reliable sources. The same thing can be said about his music- I can't find any coverage about his singles. Being popular or selling well doesn't count towards notability in and of itself (), we would still require coverage in reliable sources. Overall, all I can find is that while he has been invited to places (and being on the invite list does not count towards notability because of the sheer amount of people who do get invited to such events) and is known, he hasn't received any actual in-depth coverage that would prove that he passes our notability guidelines. The only coverage he has received has been in relation to a blowup he had with a notable person and that's not what we'd consider indepth coverage. Plus, notability is  by him having known Hudson. Sorry, but he fails notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:TRIVIAL||WP:NACTOR||WP:POPULAR||WP:NOTINHERITED)