Deletion of Web Bot

Comment: As already pointed out, sufficient  exist to meet . Notability is not temporary (), so a lack of "post-2012" sources does not affect the topic's inherent notability. (I did find one news story published this month which mentions the web bot project in a non-2012 context: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/82318).  I also agree with Colapeninsula's comment that  problems such as a failure to maintain  can be fixed through ordinary editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The bot is covered in reliable sources, meeting . There seem to be conflicting concerns that it's either an advertisement or exists primarily as a consumer warning rather than an encyclopedic article, but bias can be fixed by editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the article seems to meet , with this page from The Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6227357/Web-bot-project-makes-prophecy-of-2012-apocalypse.html and this from the Argentinian El Dia http://www.eldia.com.ar/edis/20080427/revistadomingo15.htm. Also, the bot wasn't solely used for the 2012 phenomenon so I'm not sure why a merge was proposed. I think it's probably more suited to web crawler, if a merge is required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)