Deletion of Anti-Turkism in Armenia

Comment: Despite the attempts to make the article seem more presentable, none of the issues have been resolved. There is no mention of over a century of Turkish crimes against humanity, which would show the article isn't about "hostility, intolerance, or racism". There is not even a single mention of the Armenian Genocide. And before someone tries to sneak in a trivia mention of the genocide to try fixing this, doing so would only prove this article isn't about "Anti-Turkism". The article remains a  of selective information from either unreliable or POV sources. The article attempts to blame the Armenian–Tatar massacres of 1905–07 on "Anti-Turkism" with no mention of massacres committed by Tartars, and while Kazemzadeh's claim that "it is impossible to pin the blame for the massacres on either side" is carried over, the sources of Walker and Villari blaming Tartars are not carried over. World War I has no mention of the Armenian Genocide, and the numbers the article alleges Rummel gave are actually from a Turkish statistician which Rummel is casting doubt on. And somehow Soviet Russia deporting Azeris from Armenia can be blamed on "Anti-Turkism" in Armenia. The first Nagorno-Karabakh war makes no mention of Azeri mob violence being the cause of it, such as the Askeran clash and Sumgait pogrom, because this would again ruin the "Anti-Turkism" claim. And the 2020 war fails to mention that the Azeris were the first to target civilians in the 2020 bombardment of Stepanakert, which isn't mentioned at all. Many of the sources are still unreliable. Some are in Azeri or Turkish, others are written by pro-Turkic figures such as Svante Cornell#Criticism|the bribed shill Svante Cornell. This article was clearly made (by a now indefinitely blocked user) out of spite for the Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan article. He wanted to create an equivalent article for Armenia even though no similar sentiment existed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: The entire page is inherently irrelevant material, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: per  and whatnot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: political propaganda that is of no use to Wikipedia and is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: with reservations.  Articles such as this are always problematic, and they often degenerate into a laundry list of grievances (which this is) with no attempt at explaining the complex history of conflicts between the different groups of people. It is therefore arguably a POV , but deleting it would simply be a denial that such sentiment exists, and that would be wrong too since I think the subject is notable enough to exist as a separate article. I would also suggest that those who object to the article work to improve it, and instead of edit-warring, agree on a framework so that it can be improved (for example, what sources to use). I would recommend adding a section on its causes (e.g. on Armenian Genocide which is by and large recognised by many countries), and trim the list of incidences, because frankly in all conflicts you get atrocities committed by both sides, there is no need to list all of them, only the important ones need to be given. I'd also remove all content that rely exclusively on partisan sources, use only those from independent sources.  It is also too heavily skewed to the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflicts, which is not appropriate given the title, since it is not specifically about these conflicts. A wider view on this is more useful
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)