Deletion of Emerson II, L. R.

Comment: clear |vanity, especially given the comments above by the article's subject. You are not a |reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN||WP:RS)

Comment: this |vanispamcruftisement created by the artist's promoter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)

Comment: How does it fall under ? Not having any "issues existing" is not a criteria for speedy deletion. Also, the nomination has been recently created, so there's always a chance for someone further on to bring up new evidence showing that the article may be notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)