Deletion of Empire (strategy game)

Comment: So be it, I would be happy to userfy it, and don't mind taking care of the navbox and other links. As {{u|Hellknowz}} says, the title makes it hard to tell if there are more sources out there: with the number of primary sources I think it's a matter of time before  is reached uncontroversially, it's best to keep a draft as a magnet as and when more gets published and or discovered. &#8209;&#8209
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as failing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources. From sources given, both http://empire-game.org/wp-content/uploads/Empire-Builders-article-sm.jpg and http://cdm.reed.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/reedhisttxt&CISOPTR=16311&REC=7 are not independent, http://www.ag.ru/games/empire-wargame-of-the-century/cheats/3251/http://www.wolfpackempire.com/1978infofile.txt (same thing) is derivative project and  and would only serve as extra sourcing rather than main sourcing for GNG. Interview https://web.archive.org/web/20130208063758/http://www.reed.edu/alumni/oral_hist_intro.html (article links same page twice), while great for development history and insight, is not independent. As we focus on |real-world perspective, such as reception, there isn't enough content for a stand-alone article. I cannot find any more sources, though the title is really hard to search by. Since the game is unlikely to receive further coverage at this point, I don't see much point in userfy-ing unless the editors believe there are more sources somewhere. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:WAF)

Comment: good point on the link rot: I've contacted the Reed webmaster and their Oral History Project to try to resolve that side of it (and see if they can turn up any more secondary sources). See also Talk:Empire (strategy game)|the talk page in light of the discussions at Talk:Empire Classic and Talk:Classic Empire about getting reliable sources for these unrelated–now-intertwined games, where significant progress has been made in the last month (though not yet translated into the articles). I would request that we wait to see if we have any progress on these fronts before moving to delete. I also don't see it as  (who, trying to promote what, and why?), but an attempt to clarify the confusion surrounding these very different, but identically named games. &#8209;&#8209
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)