Deletion of UFC 4

Comment: No claim is made in the article to any enduring notability (), the results section of the article is not sourced to what you can call |reliable sources. In answer to JJB failing  or  '''is''' reason to delete, have no issue to userfication (or to the MMA project space) to allow for a '''Merge''' if reliable sources can be found on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:EVENT)

Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 31
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: The article doesn't provide reliable sources with significant coverage that make analytic or evaluative claims about the event, so I believe it doesn't even pass the |general notability guideline. Like other similar articles, the information is merely |routine coverage, nothing to indicate historical significance or at least a significant lasting effect of the event, so it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. The article falls into WP:!|what Wikipedia is not as it is at best a |news report and the topic does not meet the exception criteria of  since, outside routine coverage, there are no independent reliable sources indicating that the event is notable and there is no sanctioning body or league to presume that it is inherently notable. With no target for a redirect and a lack of reliable references, I favor deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: Per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: Per , this event determined the champion of a top league so it satisfies the notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)