Deletion of Portoesque logic

Comment: Total nonsense, unfortunately not #G1 because it might not be total nonsense for everybody. You cannot base a logic on a contradicting axiom because (as the article rightly states) everything can be concluded from that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: as G3 hoax or A7 unremarkable person. Or failing those, delete as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: per my original PROD reason: ''Article is entirely unreferenced, and there are no relevant Google hits, Google scholar hits, or Google books hits. Moreover, the article is fairly devoid of meaningful content to the point of being borderline nonsense. I strongly suspect it is an intentional #G3|hoax, and if not then it is certainly |original research.''  The PROD should never have even been removed: deletion is not even remotely controversial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:OR)