Deletion of William Cornwall

Comment: In terms of the notability claims in the article, and while I'm unclear what claim to notability could be made, that the subject was a member of a particular religion (or even a minister or missionary for that faith) wouldn't seem to be a claim to notability which would even pass . Or . Otherwise, in terms of the sources to support the article/notability/etc, I'm not seeing any. At all. The only source listed in the article, ''Methodism in Galway'' (1978; Cooney), is not a book. But a pamphlet. Containing 38 pages. While it does seem to be held by several libraries in Ireland, and I haven't "checked it out" to verify, even if the subject is mentioned in that work, it seems unlikely that (even if the entirety of the 38 page pamphlet was dedicated to the subject) that it would constitute . Not seeing it. Mine is a "delete" recommendation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7||WP:CLERGY||WP:SIGCOV)