Deletion of Larry Kroon

Comment: not sufficiently notable on his own, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The entire first section falls under , and the subject of the article fails |general notability concerns ( and/or OTINHERITED, depending on how you look at it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:N||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I went through and wikified all of the references. Other then the ones regarding his daughter's illness, everything was from either a blog or other |unreliable source. I will have to agree that this is an attempt to  controversy onto Sarah Palin's VP candidacy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per #NEWS and .  He's a random pastor at a random church that just happens to have a famous congregant.  There is no independent notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I'm not American, so I may be slightly out of touch here, but this feels like a case of #NEWS. Yes, he's the pastor of Sarah Palin, but I don't understand how that makes him notable. I wouldn't be averse to a merge and redirect to Sarah Palin, as any notability he has is a direct result of his link to her, but that wouldn't be my primary choice here. Then again, I'm a Brit, so what do I know about American politics. Many thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I took out the , but someone will undoubtedly try to reinsert it.  If you take out the Palin attacks, there's nothing encyclopedic left in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: not sufficiently notable for a stand-alone article per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)