Deletion of Everipedia

Comment: This is a growing site and passes GNG based on .  There is a lot of sources for this article. I do not ''own'' the article. I simply tried to fix the article.   I am requesting the article be '''userfied''' for about 6 months while notability is better established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: fails basic GNG - there are not sufficient independent sources about everpedia yet.  Probably just 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: the closest thing to a reliable source I can see is http://www.inc.com/chirag-kulkarni/the-dna-of-disruption-how-to-disrupt-an-industry-in-3-steps.html this, which doesn't seem to meet the  threshold alone even if it is found to be reliable and intellectually independent (both of which are doubtful). The behavioral and content issues mentioned in the nomination are not good reasons to delete the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: What about turning it into (or merging it into) an article on Moghadam? The better sources here are interviews with him and/or about him, and there are a whole lot more articles about him. He certainly meets  even if this site is on the fence. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I cannot view the Bloomberg ref because I'm in China where that site is blocked. So, from what I ''can'' view, I am not seeing what is needed to support this article -- not even close. This fails GNG and in particular the |general notability guidelines for organizations. Maybe in a year they will have the media coverage, but it doesn't seem to exist now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGSIG)