Deletion of Muten Roshi (2nd nomination)

Comment: The character definitely qualifies for |notability, and the problems in the article are not so great that they can't be corrected without starting over
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: doesn't matter how many keeps this page gets. Per  policy, "''Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: as a |snowball. AfD is not the venue for article cleanup or to initiate a merger discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: as it has nothing good going for it; there are no |primary sources to support the article's veracity, no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate |notability. What it has got is ''not good'': the article has a long "Background" section written from an #The problem with in-universe perspective|in-universe perspective that is just a #PLOT|plot summary. There is no real evidence that this article should be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:FICTION||WP:WAF||WP:NOT)

Comment: How is it original research? Original research is something with no sources. The article says that it is derived from anime/manga. Sure it doesn't have every seperate comment individually referenced, but that is not required under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: No reliable sources beyond the plot itself, fails , , , and OR. Non-plot being derived from plot is original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NOR)