Deletion of Superstition in Judaism

Comment: based solely on going to AfD without attempting talk page discussion first as per  C3. Also noting that the nominating editor created this AfD in response to their similar RfC where very minimal discussion occurred and no consensus had been reached so creating this AfD seems premature
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Seem like most of the delete arguments are just 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: This seems to be |forum-shopping – complicating and inflaming the Talk:Superstitions in Muslim societies#RfC Superstitions in Muslim societies related questions|RfC.  Here's a https://www.upenn.edu/pennpress/book/13994.html book on the subject for anyone who doubts the topic's notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:FORUMSHOP)

Comment: this AFD seems like a violation of . The nominator (Bookku) created Superstitions in Muslim societies. Myself and some others questioned whether there were any sources that covered the topic as a whole, and argued the article had  and  issues. So now Bookku is nominating Superstition in Judaism for deletion. This is evident in the fact that Bookku's nomination does not mention a single problem with Superstition in Judaism whatsoever
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:OR||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per much of the above, but consider the idea to shift articles like this toward "Folklore of", "Folk belief in", "Folk beliefs of", etc.  There's some ongoing discussion of this at Talk:Superstitions in Muslim societies. The short version is that the "superstitions" label is apt to have , , , and MOS:WTW problems, while a broader topic would not, and would actually be more encyclopedic anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:OR||WP:BIAS)