Deletion of 33 Jazz Records

Comment: Notability is not inherited, but this record label isn't notable because of a single artist, that's why "vanity labels" are often merged into an artist's page.  In this case, the label is notable because of the number of notable artists signed and released, per NMUSIC #5.  The number of significant albums by notable artists, and the widespread geographic distribution (multiple countries) indicates that this label has become culturally important.  The article contains useful information to musicologists and discographers (who because of the artists, length of history, and widespread distrubution are likely to seek further information on the topic), the information contained is , and Wikipedia is thereby not improved by its deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMG)

Comment: This label has a presence in the British Jazz ecosystem, being responsible for a wide range of albums which can be seen being reviewed in The Guardian for example. However it is a common problem for articles on rcord labels, galleries, book publishers that notability is not inherited. I haven't located substantial coverage of the label itself, in the absence of which this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)