Deletion of Quantum anthropology (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . I understand the argument above, but I respectfully counter that if a fringe topic (even a reputable one) were notable enough for inclusion here, it would be something those of us with an interest in fringe topics would have at least heard about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: as |original synthesis of rather dubious sources that discuss disparate topics. One source says quantum anthropology is a subset of Christian anthropology and deals with mind-body duality. Two seem to be feminist theories, with one of those two saying nothing about anthropology, quantum or not, except that "Bohr erred ... by drawing analogies between physics and biology or physics and anthropology". The remaining two are by a political scientist who argues that the brain should be studied by using the methods of quantum physics but, at least in one of the cited works, does not use the term "quantum anthropology". So of five sources at most three use the term, and all three give different meanings. No evidence is given that any of those three meanings meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. Besides, the article is rather heavy on meaningless buzzwords. No sourced information on quantum anthropology itself is given. Who are the main proponents? When was this theory developed? Is it considered fringe or accepted by mainstream anthropologists/physicists/sociologists/theologists? The article doesn't tell, the sources do not tell
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: Believe it or not, the article is now even worse than it was when I nominated it, containing outright false statements and many citations that do not support the sentences onto which they are tacked.  is perhaps relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)