Deletion of Stephen Palmquist

Comment: A GS h index of 5 is too low, even for philosophy, to satisfy rof#C1.  does not seem apparent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: Does not meet  as shown by Xxanthippe and Agricola. Publishing is what academics do, so that does not make him notable either.  is certainly not appropriate in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Palmquist has published ~30 papers since becoming a professor in the mid 80s, but these collectively show a grand total of only 20 citations (h-index 3), which seems low for  #1 even for philosophy. FWIW, this may simply be a vanity page because there's lots of , and it was tag-team created by 2  accounts: Special:Contributions/Gosihaha|Gosihaha and Special:Contributions/Stevepq|Stevepq
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:OR||WP:SPA)

Comment: Appears not to meet  -- I would appreciate information to the contrary.  But I don't know whether he qualifies under other guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: for lack of evidence of passing . The Google scholar citation numbers certainly aren't high enough for criterion #C1, and what else is there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The  criteria are met by Palmquist.  Just because someone is an academic does not mean that the only notability criteria they can be judghed on is academics.  Anyway he may actually have effected his discipline enough to be a notable academic.  This is a very difficult to determine area.  Since those who study philosphy tend to cite the works of philosophers and not the works of scholars studying philosophy the number of citiations to Palmquist is actually more encoraging that it would be in other fields where citing others works is much more common
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: as insufficiently notable per the .  No evidence this person has been the subject of in-depth coverage by multiple, reliable published sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)