Deletion of 2014 Cirrus SR22 crash

Comment: to Cirrus SR22#Accidents and incidents -  - not notable. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've nominated that crash for deletion too. "Interesting enough" (aka ) is not a valid reason to retain an article. Uncontrolled decompression#Notable decompression accidents and incidents lists major incidents
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Seems to fall under , but at the same time it's a well referenced and complete article. Not a spam by any means, borderline, informative... pure rules lean towards deletion, but I don't feel strongly enough about it to even say week delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: or possibly '''Merge''' with 2014 SOCATA TBM crash. Thank you all for your input! These kinds of discussions keep wikipedia consistent and with good content!! I would like to reference Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 SOCATA TBM crash as a similar example where the article doesn't necessarily meet requirements but is interesting enough to keep: military aircraft intercept the pilot, well sourced, loss of contact with the pilot, ikipedia is not paper, as well as the fact that a plane flying on autopilot until it flies past its destination, runs out of fuel, and crashes because the pilot fell unconscious is pretty unusual and quite interesting. Unfortunately decompression accidents are fairly common, but in this case we don't really know why the pilot became impaired and eventually incapacitated. I agree the pilot is not wikinotable, however he was an important person at Harley Davidson for over 30 years, and an Air Safety Institute safety warning was issued about hypoxia later on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)