Deletion of Big is Better

Comment: Although it may not be immediately obvious to newer editors, Wikipedia has |inclusion criteria.  The fact that we don't publicize this better is an issue that I'd like to see addressed.  In this case, I can not find any |reliable sources that discuss the subject.  A review of the comic by |the artist himself, |bloggers, etc is not good enough.  Basically, what we need here is a review by a professional journalist.  It doesn't have to be ''The New York Times''; see /REF|this list of vetted resources by |WikiProject Comics.  The quality of the artwork, number of fans, etc do not matter.  We need professional reviews, and these apparently do not exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:3PARTY||WP:SPS||WP:CMC||WP:CMC)

Comment: per . There are no secondary sources cited in the article, and when I Google searched (adding the terms gay and comic to the "big is better" string), I found 0 relevant news results and no independent coverage in |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)