Deletion of List of wind turbines

Comment: Unreferenced is a reason for article improvement, not deletion. We should welcome the contributions of IP editors, so the identity of editors is not a reason for deletion. The article serves the encyclopediac purpose of keeping a long table of statistics out of the main wind turbine article. "Boring" is |not a policy-based arguement for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDL)

Comment: with fire, this is the perfect example of #INFO as we are not a factory manual and completely arbitrary while there is no reasonable chance of improvement without doing massive , and even then its very hard to argue if the a list of individual wind turbines is notable. Also just because its "factual information" doesn't mean it belongs in an encyclopedia, read 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:TNT||WP:EVERYTHING)