Deletion of Criticism of the Israeli government

Comment: There are other similar articles Criticism of the United States government, Criticism of the United Nations.  There is no case for : both the criticism and the response to criticism is included, . Why doesn't someone start a Support for the Israeli Government page if they feel aggrieved at this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per ,, , , and inherently . Also quite embarrassing to Wikipedia to have this speech dedicated to Israel while countries far more worthy of criticism do not have such an article beautifully dedicated to them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOTESSAY||WP:CRITS||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:POV)

Comment: as a  of various topics and therefore original research. There isn't a reliable source (I'm sure there are plenty of low quality sources though) that properly combines all the various topics on this page. I would agree that these criticisms would also apply to the United States and United Nations pages as well. In general we try to avoid criticism sections and articles: . This article isn't even necessary: many of the sections have links to pages that actually discuss the topic in a neutral manner, e.g., Human rights in Israel, Racism in Israel, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:CRITS)

Comment: as a  upon which thinly veiled Antisemitism is hung.  Criticism of Israeli policies and government procedures is well-covered in articles about those policies and procedures.  Opposition to the existence of Israel is well covered at Anti-Zionism.  This article serves no useful purpose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: The topic meets the requirements for  with all the significant coverage received in numerous relevant non-trivial, independent, reliable third party and secondary sources, and is large enough to have a stand-alone article. There is also potentially more information to expand the article further
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Firstly, people citing  haven't read the policy. It refers to synthesizing two or more sources for a statement; it doesn't have anything to do with article topics. If this article is , you can then argue then Human rights in Israel and virtually every other article is . Secondly, there are tens of "Criticism of X" articles on Wikipedia, including Criticism of Christianity, Criticism of communist party rule, Criticism of the United States government (apparently {{u|Borock}} hasn't noticed in their comment that the latter already exists
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:SYNTH||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per nom. The very existence of the article is a violation of NPOV. If it was something like Views of Israel or Positions on Israeli government it had a chance of being NPOV. As it exists now, it's just a |collection of every slander that was ever thrown toward Israel
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)