Deletion of John Tyner

Comment: Classic . Redirect to Transportation Security Administration
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Obviously falls under  and . Can be recreated if it ever has lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Press coverage does not establish notability, the article does not reference any "significant cultural impact", and the fact that an article on Steven Slater exists does not indicate that this one should be kept. Furthermore, it's simply implausible for this to become a full-fledged article because there's insufficient information.The incident lasted a few moments, stopped, and won't begin again. No new information is on the way, and there is too little to write about. Efforts to keep this seem to be textbook examples of ecentism, , and . Merge the information to relevant places and redirect it to Transportation Security Administration#Criticisms. If it becomes notable a year from now, then it can be written. But it's not notable right now. User:dmyersturnbull | &nbsp;dmyersturnbull&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTCRYSTAL)

Comment: Agree with nom, . Also, . Tyner being in the news for this one event does not mean he has lasting notability. However, the subject of passenger screening is one that has lasting notability. I suggest that the article TSA passenger screening be created (split off from the TSA article). (TSA is currently large enough to fork.) Such an article would have lasting notability and could contain history of screening (like sniffers that were not widely successful) as well as recent changes and the criticism of people like Tyner. The only reason to have an article about Tyner or this single event is if the article on the real subject (incl all events associated with that subject) is large enough to split into multiple articles. Since there is not an article specifically about TSA passenger screening, why would we have a fork (specific event/person) article? Summary: delete, redirect to a section of TSA passenger screening if someone wants to create it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: or merge/redirect if desired. Ultimately this is a case of  and  that is best covered very briefly at an article related to the TSA or criticism of its policies. Very little of the article is actually about the subject (rather it is about an incident), and there isn't enough information about the person himself to create a legitimate . Information about the incident is better served at another article as indicated. Likewise, the information in "Aftermath of the incident" appears to become tangential and speculative about general sentiment toward current TSA policies and is inappropriate for this article. Also, responding to the above request to postpone deletion, assuming he ''might'' become notable as an anti-TSA figurehead is speculative  and is not a legitimate reason to justify retaining an article about him at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP||WP:RECENTISM)