Deletion of Ebony Anpu

Comment: not enough reliable 3rd party sources to verify or establish notability.  If this is really an out of order AFD, then an admin will overturn it.  However, |we shouldn't just slavishly follow process and forget that encyclopedic content is the goal
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:CITE)

Comment: Taking part in this so I can't mess up again by closing it early. Does not meet , and has problems with |conflict of interest with the use of primary sources, which aren't |reliable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COI||WP:RS)

Comment: See (Old AfD).  ''Discussion about procedure moved to this Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ebony Anpu|AfD's talk page.''  ''|Personal attacks removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: Unless the authors of this article can obtain more third-party sources, rather than sources from the individual himself, then the article violates  and the individuality section of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOTE)

Comment: pending deletion review & RfC for out-of-process 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)