Deletion of Argument from love (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is not an argument considered in contemporary philosophy of religion. It may be used in amateur apologetics, and most likely, Richard Dawkins ridiculed it in his book ''The God Delusion'', which is probably the only reason this article exists... Still, I looked at most sources cited here, and none was explicitly and directly about an argument for the existence of God, so it's very much a  creation. I will change my mind, though, if at least the logical form of the argument can be explicitly attributed to some philosopher or even apologist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNT)

Comment: The nomination makes a claim of synthesis without detailing the supposed synthetic proposition.  The article has sources and it is not difficult to find more such as http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1DH1ZPyyTkIC&pg=PA251 this.  The rest is a matter of ordinary editing per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)