Deletion of Jose Fadul

Comment: Why on Earth would you bring religion or ethnicity into this discussion? You seem to want to make it into some sort of referendum related to how the subject has overcome all kinds of disadvantages, biases, and prejudices. ''Nobody is disparaging his character in this regard'' and you should now recognize and accept this. With all due respect, you also seem entirely ignorant of the consensus-based standards that have developed in this forum regarding academic notability. I'm sorry to say that with what we now know, it is clear that the subject is a long way from satisfying ''any'' of the criteria of . Add to that the obvious  and perhaps other shenanigans at work here (how do so many anon IP eds. know so many intimate personal details about the subject?), and I think the closing admin will not have much trouble in coming to a verdict. Respectfully
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CANVAS)

Comment: Add to this that there are 0 publications in WoS. The search "Author=(fadul j*)" does turn up 5 hits, but they are evidently all for a scientist who worked briefly at the University of Uppsala hosp. in Sweden. His journal publications are mostly in something called the International Journal of Learning, which does not appear to be widely http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/journal_profile.html indexed. For what it's worth, that journal's page seems to have text bordering on  (compare the International Journal of Learning|WP text to the http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/about.html first paragraph at the journal's "about" page and a user called Special:Contributions/Fadulj|Fadulj has contributed frequently to it.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)