Deletion of Chiropractic treatment techniques

Comment: I don't see a valid reason for deletion. If there is a problem, then |be bold and |fix it. Take a look at these two versions: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chiropractic_treatment_techniques&diff=175290491&oldid=175287402 As I created it, and after
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:FIXIT||WP:FIX)

Comment: Looks like a fork (I would suspect POV, but per  don't want to call it that because it isn't a blantant one), but why don't we merge its content with that on the Chiropracy page and turn this page into a listing of all of the other subpages on individual chiropractic treatments that the original poster recommended?  To me, that seems like the best way to resolve this dispute.  However, as a content fork, I would support deletion if no merging/listing consensus is reached
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: This was not a properly executed . What needs to happen is an effective merge of usable content back to the article from whence it supposedly came. If it is accepted by the users editing there, '''and''' the content becomes unmanageable and long, '''then and only then''' should a spin-off be considered. Right now this is a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:POVFORK)