Deletion of Fontanne

Comment: per nom.  Possibly also a |hoax
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: Your statement is|original research and "I've heard of it" arguments are not any more persuasive in AFD than "I like it."  Reliable sources are required
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: No, "I use it" is still |original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Your statement constitutes |original research and "I've heard of it" arguments are not any more persuasive in AFD than "I like it."  Reliable sources are required
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: One word does not a dialect make; it can, however, make a Wiktionary entry if it's verifiable in |reliable sources. This one fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: as a |neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Nice try. I disagree with your assertions about the claimed usage by you and your friends, or even the claimed "people in two cities" constituting a "region" and making the neologism a "dialect." And what are the |reliable sources (other than your |original research) to |verify your assertions that people in two cities (which?) use the term
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:V)