Deletion of Aciedactylus mandocaris

Comment: per . Delete would be my second option. King Kruft
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: all.  This ''grossly'' violates both  and |Writing about fiction.  It uses pseudo-scientific, realistic, long-winded writing about some utterly non-notable fictional objects
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:WAF)

Comment: per Pascal & Masamage.  No reason to break out individual entries from this work into separate articles... and ... there is nothing wrong with this nom; I don't agree with outright deletion here, but the nominator explained their reasoning for the nomination
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)