Deletion of Ryan Worsley (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per everyone above. He won multiple awards, multitude of sources show that he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: First of all, 2 months of discussion with clearly no consensus reached among substantially the same small group of editors apparently isn't enough to determine a lack of consensus...  is ''core policy'', and ''cannot'' be overridden by the relatively few editors who participate at DRV, let alone the incredibly few who have taken part in crafting the instructions there. (In fact, in the specific case of IAR ''this type of thing is the entire reason it exists in the first place!'') Given the previous closes, it would not be surprising to see the "keep" side slightly more worn out from the exact same arguments being repeated over and over, thus inappropriately tilting the balance of the discussion. In short, this whole thing is far too close for comfort to /, even if entirely unintentional – not casting aspersions on any specific user(s) here, only on the entire process, which really should be thrown out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:GAMING||WP:FORUMSHOP)

Comment: I agree with Bearcat that the awards are not enough to satisfy , the majority of the sources in the article don't cover him, and the ones that do aren't sufficient for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . The Western Canadian Music Awards are not the Grammys by a long shot. Plus Wikipedia's goals do not include righting any perceived wrongs such as recognizing the unsung behind-the-scenes contributors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)