Deletion of Bart Tanski (2nd nomination)

Comment: I disagree with the assertion above that  is a basis for deleting in this case.  That guideline should be invoked to protect otherwise private, living persons where they gain brief notoriety due to their involvement in a single news event such as an isolated involvement in a scandal, escapade, crime, disaster, protest, stunt, etc.  It does not apply to a person being receiving accolades for a sustained period of productivity or accomplishment.  We should not, and need not, stretch the boundaries of BLP1E to conclude that Tanski is not notable.  As noted above, coverage is limited to his playing of "high school" football, and the applicable criterion imposes a higher-than-normal standard of substantial and ''sustained''  coverage for a high school football player to be deemed notable.  I do not see sufficient coverage to satisfy the heightened standard for high school football players
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I see a good deal of coverage for this individual in the news, ranging from local and regional articles to USA Today.  There should be no question he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Some perspective here is important: we are discussing the notability of a ''high school football player'' who did not have a significant college career and never played in a professional game.  Any marginal notability of the subject is based solely on his having received Ohio's Mr. Football award as a 17-year-old in 2007.  That's all there is; everything else is filler.  This appears to be exactly the sort of case that the one-event rules were designed to address per ,  and .  In relevant part,  states
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP1E)