Deletion of Statue of Christopher Columbus (Chula Vista, California)

Comment: seems like a  failure. Coverage in California-wide papers include a full ''https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-06-12/chula-vista-christopher-columbus-statue-storage-protest Los Angeles Times'' article and ''https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/community-voices-project/story/2020-06-18/commentary-why-the-christopher-columbus-statue-in-chula-vista-must-go San Diego Union-Tribune'' commentary, lots of NBC San Diego stuff like https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/christopher-columbus-statue-vandalized-chula-vista-san-diego/3814/ this. Lots of smaller mentions like ''https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/These-are-the-California-statues-being-removed-15367086.php San Francisco Chronicle'' and a satirical piece in the ''https://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2020/jun/26/sdqt-statues-stored-sake-safety-and-sanity/ San Diego Reader''. Also the stuff in the article already, including the Smithsonian listing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per links provided by Bilorv. Contrary to the nom, I'll say that this item ''did'' inherit notability from the George Floyd protests - the protests led to the statue's removal and its subsequent media coverage in various RSs which granted it notability per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)