Deletion of East Meets West (podcast)

Comment: non-notable podcast. I think I smell |socks but that could just be because I haven't changed mine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)

Comment: While no doubt my initial argument falls under , I think the existence of verifiably notable personalities on a show provides notability to a work. For instance, if a radio personality like Paul Harvey had a second radio show, doesn't that make the second show notable by the prescence of Harvey alone? That argument may be faulty, but I'm not intimately familiar with all of the precedents of WP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Editors are more than welcome to discuss their reasoning why the  guideline is "broken" over on the talk page. WEB explicitly covers podcasting articles in its content. As I said previously, it is still a just guideline and a generally accepted standard amongst editors, and is open to exception. However, there is no evidence given why this article should be exempt of WEB and therefore still applies. Thankyou
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I have reformatted the ''KEEPs'' to ''Keep'' as there is no need for shouting. I notice now after five ''Keeps'' not one has addressed nomination concerns of how this article meets '''''' notability requirements. Those who wish to keep, I suggest go back and read this guideline and state how the podcast meets these requirements, or why this guideline should not apply. Also, please be civil in this discussion and  no personal attacks. Thankyou
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NPA)