Deletion of Free Wood Post (5th nomination)

Comment: In the 5 previous discussions, there were only 2 policy-based Delete !votes, versus a clear majority of editors who thought that newspaper writers around the nation being amused or irritated by this site was good enough to qualify under GNG. In my view, the radio station interview qualifies as in-depth coverage, although barely.  Per {{u|Lukeno94}} I think it's time to just accept that some people want to keep it and that that there is no  for improving it. And I'm not sure about frequent editing = COI. That could just be a fan. –&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE)

Comment: inadequate coverage in |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)