Deletion of Cecilia Chang

Comment: per , . The allegations are well-sourced, so I don't know that this demands speedy deletion, but it's not very encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTSCANDAL)

Comment: This article is a clear violation of our policies on |biographies of living people.  Wikipedia is not a tabloid or a gossip site.  Stories such as this need to be handled with great care and sensitivity. We don't do articles about people accused but not convicted of crimes unless the incident has received significant ongoing coverage in multiple independent reliable sources above what would normally be devoted in the news media to alleged criminal activity. See  for this policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PERP)

Comment: Classic 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I am not sure if it should be kept or not.  I have been following this ''news'' story.  As a dean and professor, she |barely ranks as a |notable academic.  I would agree to later re-creation if it is deleted, per Location, and gains traction.  This was a classic front-page story
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE||WP:PROF)

Comment: for now. She has received national and international coverage, but the coverage does not seem to be ongoing. I don't buy that this is a , and I would be willing to revisit this if or when there are more developments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)