Deletion of Thomas S. White, Jr.

Comment: The 1999 Forbes piece is a substantial article which is ''entirely'' about White - him, his business practices, and his firm. (Note it is not an article about the firm, except in as much as it is his firm - it describes the customers as "his customers".) The article mentions numerous ways in which White and his business activities are notable from a business perspective - $US440M under management, various field-leading rates of return, and so forth. Forbes is a reliable sources on business topics. I don't have access to the ''Smart Money'' or ''Crain’s Chicago Business'' articles or the other Forbes articles, but I have no reason to believe they are any less acceptable as sources. Thus White is notable by the required standard of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. (He also picks up more minor coverage for example in http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2004-07-25/how-the-independents-fared Businessweek in 2004, and is widely quoted as an expert on financial matters, for example in a Los Angeles Times piece dated Jun 13, 1999, article author KATHY M. KRISTOF, page 2 of the business section). I would also add that the deletion rationale falls under the essay section ot notable and should be discounted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)