Deletion of Kermit Roosevelt III (2nd nomination)

Comment: There seems to be a sufficiently significant coverage of the nominee, mostly concerning his books. I'd say it is enough to pass criteria 4c of  or criteria 7 of .https://thepenngazette.com/that-roosevelt/https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/22/kermit-roosevelt-iii-speaks-in-dc-on-japanese-inte/https://zibbyowens.com/transcript/elyssafriedlandkermitroosevelthttps://www.cato-unbound.org/contributors/kermit-roosevelt-iii
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: Agreed under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: under  as others have already said
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Per , it suffices that he's created a body of work that is the subject of "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews".  I think that the reviews that have been mentioned here suffice; there are more in the article.  The article has  issues, but AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:PROMO)

Comment: There are issues with the article, but I believe the subject passes  as an academic.  Needs clean up, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)