Deletion of Jill Kelley

Comment: It does seem like a close to textbook example of .  But she ''was'' on the Food Network reality show ''Food Fight'' in 2003.http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/petraeus_twins_on_tv_food_fight_saEHaN6qZQQuDqrL7Gu2wM  Does that relatively minor appearance make her a notable person outside of this scandal?  I don't participate in these sorts of discussions enough to know, but I kind of doubt it. Similarly, there are a couple of local news stories above, yet that honestly seems kind of like trivial coverage under . If someone's notable mostly for one major event but arguably notable for other trivial-ish reasons, does BLP1E still apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO)

Comment: for now to Petraeus sex scandal. That is a term used by https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22Petraeus%2FBroadwell+scandal%22&oq=%22Petraeus%2FBroadwell+scandal%22&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.3622.5323.0.6030.3.2.0.1.0.0.71.125.2.2.0...0.0...1ac.1.2TH-ilRPPck#hl=en&gs_nf=3&tok=Chd1N0Rqv6hfygBf5jaY0g&ds=n&pq=%22petraeus%2Fbroadwell%20scandal%22&cp=33&gs_id=2erb&xhr=t&q=%22Petraeus%20sex%20scandal%22%20-wikipedia&pf=p&safe=off&tbo=d&gl=us&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&oq=%22Petraeus+sex+scandal%22+-wikipedia&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=1c3a7dd9ff9ee58f&bpcl=38093640&biw=1024&bih=461 tens of thousands of news stories so far, and is not just a salacious term made up by some Wikipedia editor, although "Petraeus affair" might also be appropriate.  Her life as a socialite was not at all notable before the alleged email harassment led to exposing  the Petraeus affair and the alleged email exchange with Gen. Allen. Details are sketchy about what she or Allen emailed to one another. This is an instance of  . We are not a supermarket tabloid, and we are not on deadline. An article can always be spun out of the Petraeus sex scandal article at some future date.I am amazed that anyone would think that Petraeus and Allen writing letters in her sister's custody dispute somehow contributes to her notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: because she is the main character that sparked the Petraeus scandal and is now actively at the center of it. If anything, this article will grow by leaps and bounds given the scope of this unfolding case. She is getting huge media attention that qualify for , ; 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: to Petraeus scandal. An instance of , where the only thing we know is that she exchanged a lot of emails with Allen. Before that point, a good supporter of the US Army and military, but nothing else. If a certain volume of email exchange with a notable person enables makes that person to pass , then this place really is going downhill fast and heading towards a gossip magazine! Rgds
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP)

Comment: Right now this seems like a text book BLP1E. Unless notability outside of the current scandal can be shown, its probably best that we redirect this to either the parent article on the Petraeus article or a disambiguation page for Jill Kelly. This kind of article has always been one of Wikipedia's greatest weaknesses, especially by those with little understanding of  and . Again, unless notability outside of the scandal can be established this should be redirected. If future events should prove Kelley has indeed garnered independent notability a new article can easily be spun out of the scandal
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)