Deletion of G. Edward Griffin (4th nomination)

Comment: As far as ''The Creature from Jekyll Island'' is concerned, I note that it has been praised by ''Forbes'' magazine contributors http://www.forbes.com/sites/shahgilani/2013/05/31/fix-america-fire-the-fed/  http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanlewis/2014/11/13/lets-meet-the-hard-money-extremists/ , cited as a factual source by an economics textbook published by Springer Publishing|Springer on the history of the Fed http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-06215-0_2 , and cited as a reference by an academic journal published by John Wiley & Sons|Wiley http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.20627/abstract . Griffin's expertise on the Federal Reserve satisfies notability criteria per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The accurate (I mean, accurately cited, not accurate in fact) so far placed in the article which does not violate  justifies  or .  The book appears to meet , and if material in the present article belongs in an article about the book, one could make a case for renaming this article to The Creature from Jekyll Island, and clearing out statements not about the book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK)

Comment: For people who write books, the notability usually depends on the amount  of notice given the books. This is similar  in all creative fields. For example, works discussing Rodin's sculpture is evidence that he is notable as a sculptor.  He meets  as well as the GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)