Deletion of Paul Maric

Comment: While the subject looks like they should be notable, after I excluded social media sites, and the subject's own sites, all I could see was other sites presenting material by the subject.  I could not see any I|RS material about the subject.  The subject does seem to be respected and prolific based on sites presenting the subject's material, but I cannot see material supporting  to support GNG.  Perhaps .  I might be convinced to change my opinion if someone can show me some IRS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NEXIST||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I’ve been following him for some time and in the automotive industry he’s a highly reputable and authoritative source for automotive content. I regularly see him on television commenting on automotive topics and he is all over the radio. He was recently quoted by Channel 9 ((Australian television network) see https://finance.nine.com.au/2017/08/25/12/47/test-driving-the-new-holden-commodore-zb) and his work is constantly referenced by US publications (see https://www.carthrottle.com/post/expect-the-incoming-bmw-z4-to-be-completely-different-to-the-supra/https://www.autoevolution.com/news/bmw-australia-boss-swears-2019-z4-and-toyota-supra-will-drive-differently-120793.htmlhttp://www.motorauthority.com/news/1113025_new-toyota-supra-and-bmw-z4-to-offer-unique-driving-characteristicshttp://www.motorauthority.com/news/1110935_potential-2019-ford-ranger-raptor-spiedhttp://www.carscoops.com/2017/10/can-kia-stinger-take-on-all-aussie.htmlhttps://www.autoevolution.com/news/kia-stinger-demolishes-holden-commodore-ss-v-chevrolet-ss-in-1-4-mile-race-120960.html) and he guest publishes on UK publicationshttp://www.autoexpress.co.uk/tesla/model-3/100317/new-tesla-model-3-review. I was surprised to see this come up as recommended for deletion given how prolific he is to automotive journalism in Australia. For the record, I have no association with this person or the article's creator, but believe they are 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'll offer one last contribution to this discussion. After a closer review of , this person meets the guidelines for , in particular "''The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.''" As cited in references 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, these third party reputable publications cite the person and their work, thus meeting the requirements of . While the article appears to have been created by a now blocked user, it shouldn't affect the validity of the article in question
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CREATIVE||WP:N)