Deletion of Culture of Akron, Ohio

Comment: or '''Redirect''' The relationship between the "Culture and contemporary life" section at Akron, Ohio and this article is backwards though. The "Culture and contemporary life" section is quite long, there are 11 kb of readable prose while this article has ''less than one kb''. Everything should either be in one section of the main article with Culture of Akron, Ohio a redirect or everything moved there with a |WP:Summary at the main article.  I prefer the redirect option, the coverage of this topic isn't mature
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: I would hope the article's creator would want to keep it.  That argument might hold water if the article in question actually covered some of that.  Instead it focuses on trivia and virtually every appearance of mention of Akron in media, so falls under .  When I think of culture, I think of things like institutions and traditions unique to a certain area or unique ways of doing something, not a list of media appearances in obscure books, TV shows, movies, and even video games
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIV)

Comment: per Stepshep's comments.  Most of the info falls under , even the sourced info.  Vast majority of article lists every appearance or mention of the city of Akron in books, video games, TV shows, and movies and actually explains very little of the culture (which is not notable anyway) of Akron, Ohio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: but at the same time we also need to have |sources.  This article has been tagged since August for sources as it currently has 5 and even those are sourcing what is mostly trivia over encyclopedic material.  It should never have been created with just 5 sources to begin with, not to mention numerous spelling and grammatical errors.  This isn't Britannica, but it's still an encyclopedia, not a collection of trivia.  I'm not opposed to sub-articles for Akron, even a Culture article, but here I think we need to start over.  If that can be done without completely deleting the article, then go for it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)