Deletion of Hawaiian English

Comment: I did some Googling http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%2B%22Hawaiian+English%22+%2Blaw&btnG=Search http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Hawaiian+English%22&btnG=Search and I can't find any independent verification of the claims in the article. That doesn't mean they aren't verifiable, of course, but I'd expect to find something. An article that claims the existence of a dialect, I think, should be deleted if no citations can be provided to validate the claim. However, I'm not familiar with this topic, so I don't know what may or may not exist in the academic literature. I'd say leave it with the unreferenced notice, put up a factual accuracy dispute notice if you challenge its validity, and start looking for some sources one way or the other. If it really is |unverifiable, and there's some research to back that up, then it should be relisted on |AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:AFD)