Deletion of Alison Wheeler (2nd nomination)

Comment: I don't see "important member of WikiMedia" in our |notability guidelines.  Further, I believe that we should be extra cautious when judging the notability of such persons as (a) we're probably biased in such a judgement and (b) we should always strive to avoid even the appearance of impropriety
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I can't tell you how to think, or how to vote. But in my view that Alison is a good person (hey, all lib dems are good people, that's why they've no chance of getting power :P) shouldn't really count one way or the other. Neither would I place a vote and look for reasons using policy - I'd look at policy (including, btw, ) and use that to shape my vote. But I'm not a "proper" Wikipedian, and of course wikt:YMMV|YMMV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Fails .  Would reconsider if additional sources were (properly and fully) cited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Nothing notable about being a volunteer for the wikimedia project. Fails . Is there really anything more to say? Special:Contributions/194.189.32.65|194.189.32.65
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I can't see how  would take precendence secondary sources, which form the basis for this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)

Comment: Does not appear to be notable enough per . Searches for http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+wikipedia&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 her name plus Wikipedia, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+%22liberal+democrats%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus Liberal Democrats, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+LGBT&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus LGBT, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+gay&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus gay, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+lesbian&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus lesbian, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+%22brazen+radio%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 plus Brazen Radio, and finally plus http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22alison+wheeler%22+wikimedia&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 wikimedia appear to turn up insufficient sourcing for everything she may be notable for that is listed in her article from reliable third-party sourcing. As her former status (she appears to have resigned?) on an inactive/seperate fork of the Wikimedia project (their page on Meta the last I looked was http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_UK&limit=500&action=history largely idle for some time) is no factor towards figuring notability, unfortunate Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)