Deletion of List of The Pirate Bay proxies

Comment: Now that CFCF has started verifying which proxies are accessible using , I believe Wikipedia is now aiding and abetting copyright. This page should be deleted now. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Setting the NOTDIRECTORY issue aside... I don't think this list passes otability#Stand-alone lists.  NSAL repeatedly calls for notability to be based on the ''group'' or ''set''... not the individual components of the list. So... the key question is whether the topic of the list ("proxy servers for The Pirate Bay") has been discussed (in reasonable depth) '''as''' a ''group'' or ''set'' by independent reliable sources.  I think the answer to that is "no".  What I see is a string of sources that each mention ''individual'' proxies (and often not in depth)... but ''no'' sources that discuss "proxies of The Pirate Bay" as a unique phenomenon or concept... no sources that discuss them as "group or set
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The nominator is incorrect in asserting that the article was "incorrectly declined for speedy deletion under #G11". The CSD nomination was not appropriate, which I had explained earlier, as it did not meet the requirement of CSD#G11. The nom has provided a laundry list of links, but I too would like to know how the article fails to meet each of the guidelines. It's easy to list guidelines but the nom is claiming the article should be deleted, so he really needs to justify deletion, which a laundry list does not do
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Can't say about the TOU, but the  horse is pretty much beaten into near mush. Plus IMO the sources used may demonstrate notability for The Pirate Bay, sure, but are at best mere passing mentions for the domains. "Giving information on the blocks" (per CFCF above) is sufficiently done at The Pirate Bay#Domain blocking by countries, and beyon that is  territory. '''野狼院ひさし
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:IINFO)

Comment: Per  and . Wikipedia is not a directory, and not a repository of links to external websites. I also agree that this could potentially violate m:Terms of Use#4. Refraining from Certain Activities|WMF's TOU, as pointed out by the nominating statement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTLINK)