Deletion of SpyHunter

Comment: COI issues aside (and I left a warning in the user's page about their choice of name) or the notability of the company itself, this simply isn't notable. There's nothing out there that would get it past 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . The topic is a |non-notable software in |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Nomination is a bit deceptive. Yes, the company wrote an  article about their software... in 2006 (aka over 6 years ago). Since then, the article has been seriously reworked, sabotaged, reworked, sabotaged, etc. There are a ton of references missing from the current version of the article, specifically all of the negative reviews. The software is crap (imo), but there have been plenty of reviews done on it over the years that you can find links to by viewing history. It appears that the company is trying to remove negative press (a current  issue, but one that doesn't require deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:COI)