Deletion of Wikinovel

Comment: to those saying it should be deleted as a neologism: the guidelines at  don't apply, as they are targetted for discussions about terms "as observed in communities of interest or on the internet — without attributing these claims to reliable secondary sources".  Five such sources have been linked from this AfD, and more are linked in the article's talk page.  This clearly invalidates any cause for concern relating to that guideline.  At which point,  is the only guideline we have, and that clearly indicates that this article should be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:N)

Comment: So then, where are the assertions of notability? The |multiple non-trivial independent media mentions, the |verfiable information, the |Reliable sources. What I think we have here is an advert for Million Penguins trying (and failing IMO) to masquerade as an article about wiki novels
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: I did find a sort-of source http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&refer=home&sid=asTAbFQZW83I here, but that isn't going to be enough by itself to establish |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)