Deletion of Aftermath of the 2021 United States Capitol attack

Comment: If ''merge'' is the most plausible outcome, but the OP admits that it should not be merged because the main article is large enough, then it seems we are following  perfectly. While due/undue conversations can certainly be had about ''some'' small portion of the material in the sub-articles, it's clear from even just a cursory glance that there's quite a bit of information that ''is'' due, and was split off for size reasons in the parent article. What content is due/undue is a consideration that can take place through normal discussion/editing processes on the talk pages. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:ARTICLESIZE)

Comment: As Berchanhimez said, we can discuss whether some content of the articles is , but it's pretty obvious that the topics as a whole are notable. For example, hundreds of  have covered the criminal charges and are still publishing {{Google|criminal charges capitol riot|new reports every day
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE||WP:RS)

Comment: Valid ontent Forking as the main article is too long as is and the important aspects of the January 6 attack are too much for one article. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Valid  sub-article. That being said, I do appreciate {{u|Alalch Emis}}' concerns about this being a superfluous layer of  (2021 United States Capitol attack#Aftermath — Aftermath of the 2021 United States Capitol attack — several different sub-articles). Indeed, some sections such as 2021 United States Capitol attack#Political donors and Aftermath of the 2021 United States Capitol attack#Political donors are identical across the two articles at time of writing.{{pb}}However, I would be more inclined to condense 2021 United States Capitol attack#Aftermath and/or expand Aftermath of the 2021 United States Capitol attack rather than delete the latter in order to solve that issue. An example of how we can write things with three different levels of detail can be seen at 2021 United States Capitol attack#Potential spread of COVID-19, Aftermath of the 2021 United States Capitol attack#Potential spread of COVID-19, and COVID-19 pandemic in Washington, D.C.#Concerns in relation to the U.S Capitol Attack (which isn't to say that there isn't still room for improvement—there is).{{pb}}What's more, this article contains information that I think belongs on Wikipedia, but that I would consider to be  in the main article and not suitable for a stand-alone article (namely the Aftermath of the 2021 United States Capitol attack#Revocation of Trump honorary degrees, contracts, and other connections section).{{pb}}All in all, I don't think deleting this is the right way to go. I think further editing to improve the quality at all three levels is the best way to improve the encyclopaedia as a whole
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARYSTYLE||WP:SUMMARYSTYLE||WP:UNDUE)