Deletion of Nahid Kabir

Comment: Fails . Having an h-index of 5 or 6 clearly shows that the author's work is not popular ... given that she is a senior professor, the h index should have been higher if her work was notable. (as a comparison, fresh PhD graduates often have H-index of 8+). The conflict of interest is particularly disturbing ... most of the edits to the article are either from the subject (from her Harvard IP or her Australian IP) or someone related to her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: none of this fine academic's work has crossed over into the popular world. She has an ''h''-index of 5 or 6. No secondary sources exist that analyse ''her''. DGG's own WorldCat shows that her books are ''not'' held be very many libraries, and what libraries do hold them are all university libraries. This all says that this is an ''ordinary'' professor, a run-of-the-mill professor, the type of professor that  is designed to exclude
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)