Deletion of Charles Burton (sinologist)

Comment: to Canada–People's Republic of China relations. I cleaned up the article a little. He does have an academic connection, but it's not enough to meet , and neither is his very weak citation record at http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Charles+Burton+China&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= Google Scholar. His claim to fame would be through , in that he apparently did have an impact on Canada-China relations through a study he released in 2005; this is confirmed by various references at the article. That seems to me like a pretty weak basis for a stand-alone article, but still deserving of better than an outright delete
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: It appeared based on the references available that |notability was clearly met while this was in AFC.  I'm the one who reviewed and moved to articlespace.  Although I'm concerned about COI, not sufficiently so to detract from the notability of the article.  Perhaps there's a better title, as "Sinologist" is not a common disambig term
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)