Deletion of Helpling

Comment: promotional or trivial coverage and content. Coverage also based on PR campaigns. Interviews with the founder is promotional, not second or third party independent coverage. Fails CORPDEPTH, GNG, and WP:ORG. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content. Mentions-in-passing or churnalism don't cut it - just shows there's a working marketing dept at the company. As such, topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: per Cunard. Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: completely .  A small wave of PR-generated media attention focussed in London five years ago, almost exclusively for the period February-June 2014. A company offering out-sourced precarious work cleaning services at barely minimum wages (not even Living_wage#United_Kingdom|London living wage)....if this were a , sure ... but it's an ... at very best it could be cited as an example on gig economy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:DIRECTORY||WP:ENCYCLOPEDIA)