Deletion of Norwegian Republican Alliance

Comment: i would urge not to initiate meta-articles on minor parties. It was introduced in swedish wiki, and the result has been a mess, with little encyclopediatic value. What is the problem with having a short article on NRA, if the same lines are copied into a meta article anyway? The only difference is that categorizations and interwikis gets messed up if the merge is pushed through. It's important to understand that notability is guideline, intended to safeguard the quality and integrity of wikipedia, rather than an iron law. The notability guideline is intended to weed out spoofs, hoaxes, purely web-based phenomena and bad jokes, not limit spread of encyclopediatic information (
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PAPER)

Comment: http://www.omrlp.com/ Anyone with a bit of money to throw away on lost deposits can stand in a national election and get 94 votes - it doesn't necessarily confer notability. |Notability requires multiple, independent sources, without which a |verifiable article cannot be written. http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Norsk+Republikansk+Allianse%22&btnG=Search&meta= Google turns up 483 hits, including Wikipedia and its mirrors, but http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Norsk+Republikansk+Allianse%22&btnG=Search&meta= Google News turns up nowt, so it doesn't look promising, but I'll reserve judgement since I don't speak Norwegian, so can't assess the sources Google does come up with
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)