Deletion of Bestgore.com

Comment: The site is sufficiently notable for its identification of Luka Magnotta alone, and for the obscenity prosecution alone; there is at least twice as much notability as needed per WP:GNG.  The person maintaining the site might be a  (I haven't looked into it); in any case it's clear that BLP will favor speaking about what was done on the site, the more directly verifiable data, rather than taking everything the extra step to the more specialized topic of considering one person's role in running the site
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I'm trying to find sources now and there's enough evidence to make me think that this site is notable outside of the now infamous Luka Magnotta video. To be honest, I don't really think that the owner is notable outside of the website. Most of what I'm seeing in the article mentions him within the scope of the website, although if I find enough to show that the owner has individual notability I might change that opinion. In any case, the Magnotta video has brought the website into the public eye and now there's articles that are focusing on the website itself. It's not as focused on as the murder for obvious reasons, but there's enough to suggest that it has notability. Anywho, I also wanted to state that the presence of other shock site articles on Wikipedia does not mean that an article on Best Gore should be kept if it doesn't meet notability guidelines. It just means that 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)