Deletion of Valley Center Western Days

Comment: to '''Valley Center, California'''. The fork Valley Center Days has been nominated for speedy deletion per |A10 and rightly so. It duplicated everything in the original version of this article  with the exception of the "Name change" section. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valley_Center_Western_Days&oldid=723698216 → https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valley_Center_Days&oldid=723705429. Until that "new"article is deleted or redirected I have rewritten that section. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valley_Center_Days&oldid=723938341#Name_Change This was '''entirely unacceptable''' to state in Wikipedia's voice. It also used |original research and primary sources. I have also rewritten the "History" section of both this article and the fork as they were copyvio, copied verbatim from https://www.vchistory.org/valley-center-western-days/ here. The business about one of the recent editors of this article using it to publicise his newspaper ''The Valley Roadrunner'' or websites is spurious. It has never been added to this article by name or as a reference. Note also, that in this article the name "Western Days", and use of http://www.westerndays.org westerndays.org as the official website long predates https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valley_Center_Western_Days&oldid=547675272, https://web.archive.org/web/20110728173212/http://www.westerndays.org/westerndays/Welcome.html the acquisition of the newspaper by Justin Salter, who only acquired it in late 2015 http://www.northcoastcurrent.com/region/2016/01/06/times-advocate-in-escondido-valley-center-sold-to-roadrunner/. The rival publication ''Valley Center Happenings'' is an e-publication, but not a blog. However, when it comes to self-publicising note https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/VCHappenings these additions to Valley Center, California by the now-blocked
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A10||WP:NOR)

Comment: Alright just so we are all aware of how deletion discussion work here. It is not a place for clearly |conflicted editors to fight it out. Deletion discussions are also |not a vote but a decision based on Wikipedia policy and guidelines. If you all can't come up with something that proves that the event meets what is outlined at , nothing you say is going to change the fact that the article does not meet our criteria for inclusion and will be deleted. So please, either find something or accept it for what it is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOTVOTE||WP:NEVENT)