Deletion of Henry Radusky

Comment: most of the deleted content was not focussing on Radusky, but on a |coatrack-y listing of projects he was involved in as architect - with lots of irrelevant details. Radusky is only mentioned in passing in his obvious role as architect, none of the sources offers additional relevant biographical information. The general problem with the underlying certification process is sufficiently mentioned in Self-Certification (New York City Department of Buildings), but a Wiki-article should not serve as a directory or "list of shame" of such incidents without sufficient topic-related context. On a sidenote, several other related articles have also been edited in an apparent attempt to raise more awareness for these problems in New York City ( applies). Removing these coatrack details, the remaining content and sources ''directly about Radusky'' are not sufficient to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTADVOCACY)

Comment: This appears to be a  architect, and the article as written has no working references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: Fails . After all the controversial material was removed, it is also became apparent the subject fails  as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG)