Deletion of A. Amaranath

Comment: It has '''consistently''' been held that a single appearance at the highest level of a sport is sufficient for . The correct interpretation of "presumed" in WP is that it is considered to be the case, unless there is evidence to the contrary, for '''presumed notability''' to mean the subject is notable unless it can be demonstrated that it is not. In this case, no one has presented any evidence suggesting that the subject is not notable, given that he has played cricket at the highest level and meets  (see CRIC in SPORTS). Furthermore, there have been several precedents in which subjects like this one have been '''kept''' or where '''no consensus''' has been ruled (see, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Dinaparna and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohan Rangarajan (2nd nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CRIN||WP:NCRIC||WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: Redirect''' to suitable target. {{ping|Dee03}}, {{ping|TheGracefulSlick}}, {{ping|Johnpacklambert}}, {{ping|Steve Quinn}}, {{ping|Rhadow}}, {{ping|Blue Square Thing}} Why not have a list something like that List_of_minor_planets:_316001–317000#084 for cricket biographies and redirect them there than discussing every single of them waisting a lot of time and energy. There are tens of thousands of cricket biographies and we can't discuss every single of them. We should devise an alternate guidelines or methodology which we can follow directly without need for lengthy discussions. Hope, we will have consensus. This is more likely to be deleted as current situation suggests. I don't think we will able to find any alternative way for these database entries. I tried but no such consensus developed. Fails  as simple
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Still does not meet our general notability guideline. We should not have to dig around in |original research just to confirm this person's existence. BLPs deserve higher quality than this. Obviously, these articles are ''not'' "consistently" kept and copy-and-pasting the same exact argument across cricket-based AfDs does not make it any more compelling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)