Deletion of Historical anomalies in Blackadder

Comment: Interesting and worth a read, but as clear an example of |original research you're ever likely to find.  I'm afraid that "being useful" and "educational" doesn't negate this.  Original Research does not belong on WP, it's a basic policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Pure |original research, alas, and Wikipedia just isn't the right forum for it.  Creator should consider putting it on her personal web site instead, as I think it's cool
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Could the 'keep' voters address the question of whether any |reliable sources are discussing the historical accuracy of Blackadder in a significant way, so we can be sure we're not violating |No Original Research, one of the Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)