Deletion of Marie-Rose Mueller

Comment: I started reading the article thinking that it would be a clear keep, but had to abandon that idea as I read though it.  There are no inline citations, so it's hard to tell which of the facts asserted are sourced where, but of the three links provided, one is just an entry in a list, one is a dead link which doesn't show up in the http://web.archive.org internet archive, and the remaining link is to 247-word news report which offers far fewer facts than are in the article, supporting the suggestion that the article contains a lot of |original research. Even if the  missing article was was substantial, she still falls far short of .It would be great to include a properly-sourced single paragraph on Mueller in a list of extremely long-lived American people, but without massive new evidence of notability this standalone article looks like a clear delete. If the article was plausibly referenced I'd suggest a merger to a list, but I don't see anything here worth keeping unless new sources are available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BIO)

Comment: 62 Google hits minus "wikipedia", nothing on Google News. Many of the Google hits are blogs and forums. Wikipedia is not a #DIR|directory of supercentenarians or anything else
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)