Deletion of 2015 Kharkiv bombing

Comment: both or, at maximum, merge the 2015 bombing into one of the relevant surrounding articles (per my earlier comment above). The 2006 bombing simply doesn't add up per . A handful of RS reiterating the same initial report with no knowledge of who or why simply places it firmly in the  category. I'm not certain as to why both have been nominated in the same deletion discussion as there's nothing to indicate their having anything in common other than the fact that they occurred in Kharkiv. Whatever the case, the 2006 article is a prime case of . The 2015 bombing is related to an ongoing war in Eastern Ukraine, not a standalone article. It's a terrible event, but we don't dedicate articles to every event in the history of conflicts, and I don't see how  is grounds as a defence for grabbing any headline and running with it per  because, somehow,  over and above every other event reported on that day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:NOTDIARY||WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:RECENTISM||WP:ITSIMPORTANT)

Comment: Fail , and are a product of |news-style reporting. It does do "harm", in that it creates articles that do not meet our policies. These events can be mentioned at Kharkiv, and in fact already are. There is no justification for stand-alone articles. The main article is neither too long, nor is there enough content to justify it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Deadly terror attack during political rally in the heart of a great city widely covered in the international press.  Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Neither article meets . Pure , plus Wikipedia is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)