Deletion of Levitron

Comment: Article does not improvement and needs clean-up to show a |neutral point of view, but I think the article should be allowed to develop
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: If it's potentially notable in a manner that could be expressed through revision, then it's not  and most ''definitely'' not , but rather . Still not sure how "trademark litigation history" is going to promote the product, which would have been the aim of an advertisement
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:CSD||WP:ATD)

Comment: but clean-up so it doesn't sound like an advertisement, and so that it has a |neutral point of view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)