Deletion of Héctor Andrés Negroni

Comment: I'm not sure about this one, to be honest. I can see both sides of the argument. I agree with Damiens about the sourcing. I don't believe that some of the sources would be considered |reliable as they ''could'' be considered to have a conflict of interest due to the proximity of the authors to the subject. (Please see Wikipedia:RS#Questionable sources.) However, from what I can see the subject appears to be "recognised by their peers as an authoritative source on military matters/writing". This quote is direct from #PEOPLE, which would therefore seem to indicate that the subject fits the general criteria of inclusion set by concensus in the project. Additionally some of the military achievements seem like they could be notable, i.e. first Puerto Rican graduate of US Air Force Academy, and there are a number of decorations, which although they don't confer notability within the project by themselves such as the Medal of Honor, when held together with other achievements they might lead to improving the subject's notability. Would it be possible, perhaps, for the author to provide a few more citations to third party sources? This might help ease the concerns that people might have about the sourcing and then notability would be unquestionable. (For instance a quote from somewhere that cites that Negroni's book is considered to be a definitive account that is essential to understanding the topic.) Also other sourcing for the biographical information as this could be a  concern
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:MILMOS||WP:BLP)

Comment: Unless you are likewise going to claim that anyone who has expressed support for proposed deletion is ''also'' acting in bad faith, this nomination needs to be treated a legitimate.  It may be that, in a day or so, we see that it can be closed as per ; or it may be that five or more days are needed to seee where consensus lies.  But the proposition that ''one'' editor who supports deletion acted in bad faith is insufficient basis for speedy close unless that editor were the sole supporter. —Special:Contributions/24.255.26.9|24.255.26.9
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Since this article ''still'' wasn't properly tagged to-day, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H%C3%A9ctor_Andr%C3%A9s_Negroni&action=history I have tagged it.  ''A closer should note that'' '''''the clock didn't begin ticking until now'''''''.''  We don't even know yet whether it would be fair to invoke , as the comments may not be representative
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)