Deletion of Meta-epistemology (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are two issues here: (1) the inherent notability of the topic, and (2) the current state of the article.  Regarding (1), the subject is a notable topic of academic discourse.  For example, it is the subject of an entry in ''The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy'' http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405106795_chunk_g978140510679514_ss1-91, is the subject of several academic papers (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=meta-epistemology&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= Google scholar query) and is discussed in a number of books as previously pointed out.  The topic satisfies .  Regarding (2), I agree the article is in poor shape, but this is a  problem that can be fixed through dedicated editing.  The existence of a substantial body of academic literature on this topic gives the article  - and the "deletion of articles with potential should be avoided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:POTENTIAL)