Deletion of Tune Day (2nd nomination)

Comment: While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tune Day|previously discussed at AfD and the result was delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: the sourcing at first flance appears superficially persuasive, but is collectively little more than a collection of WP:MILL, passing mentions, blogs and primary sources. No sustained, persistent coverage |is found in third-party, independent reliable sources. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: with some perplexity.  Unlike most 'ed articles, there does appear to be a hint that this person has a significant career in the music production industry which has been overwhelmed by the non-SIGCOV of their music performance career. I can't find anything more than passing mentions of the former, despite some impressive titles.  The sources leave the impression that is one of those probably real-English "notable" people that are not wiki-English "notable" but impressions are not enough to alter this !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)