Deletion of Michael Oddy

Comment: the above comment misstates the position. Wikipedia is not part of the electoral process, even if some politicians try to make it so. People get articles because of their individual notability not because they are standing against a notable person. In the UK we get all manner of nutters standing against well-known figures - on this logic all such oddballs would get their own article. In this case there is no sound evidence of achievement (short-term interim leader of a party before its formation? I don't think so) or of sufficient significant secondary sources to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: He is mentioned in some news articles, but there isn't enought  material to develop a Wikipedia article on this topic. Fails . Now, if this were Michael Oddy who made it to the 1963 British Open squash championship
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)