Deletion of Neuralink

Comment: and Delete. References have no detail on the company other than rumour and therefore fails . Other articles rely on hearsay, rumour, gossip, tweets and quotations from connected people. Topic fails GNG and . I would like any Keep !voters to provide links to specific articles they believe meet  guidelines as I'm having trouble locating any
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Clearly satisfies . I understand the nomination is based on the assumption that after the launch, there were "No further sources or available coverage detailing anything further detailing sic the company's plans or progress", but that is simply wrong - I just https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neuralink&diff=863492785&oldid=863235652 expanded the article based on the in-depth Gizmodo report from 2018. PS: While I appreciate the effort to keep speculative medical claims out of the article, let's not go overboard with MEDRS, and pay attention to Wikipedia:Biomedical_information#What_is_not_biomedical_information?. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)