Deletion of Kasumi Nakane

Comment: Do some homework.  Just because |you can't find much in the way of ''English-language'' sources via Google doesn't mean the subject is auto-nonnotable, especially if they are stars outside the Anglosphere.  Did anyone even ''bother'' to look at her ja.wikipedia article?  The list of movie roles and publications is ''much'' larger over there, the article is subject to either incessant editwarring or vandalism, because it is protected from editing, the talk page is active (and notably the first post on it is one of the en.wikipedia article versions' editors asking for help from people there to improve the article here).  This should be tagged for cleanup and improved, not trashed just because it is |unfamiliar and hard to source ''in English'', very |stubbish, and desperately needs copyediting and an article lead that tells us something meaningful.  This is a clean-up, not a throw-away.  PS: Credit where due: User:Caknuck noticed the problems with this nomination before I did, though oddly he hasn't commented here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS||WP:IDONTKNOWIT||WP:STUB)