Deletion of Ann Friedman

Comment: per , based on what I see at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ann_Friedman&action=history the article's history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per  and  as an award winning and recognized journalist. While I agree with the nominator that the original article was poorly sourced, Ann Friedman is the subject of articles about her, is frequently cited and her editorship of GOOD magazine was much publicized. She is important as a feminist and young female magazine editor. The pool of sources about her is much richer than the article at the time of nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Demonstrating notability on articles for journalists/editors is always difficult and sort of a blind spot for Wikipedia, but I'm seeing enough coverage in reliable sources for this to pass . As an editor, Friedman has worked for several well-known internet properties, she was one of http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/20_women_to_watch.php?page=allhttp://www.cjr.org/cover_story/20_women_to_watch.php?page=all "20 women to watch" featured in a 2012 Columbia Journalism Review cover story, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103987014 offers analysis on NPR and the http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2011/08/chris_hayes_has_the_right_glas.html Rachel Maddow Show, and was http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/few_female_bylines_in_major_ma.php specifically singled out in an article about the paucity of women bylines in magazines. Concerns over the reliability of interview sources can and should be addressed at the article or RSN
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: More fresh material was added. None of those with a preference for delete are disputing that the GOOD magazine incident received  as I noted above. Despite what is said above, the citations are NOT unreliable as they consist of ''LA Times'', ''New York Magazine'', and ''The Atlantic'' among other publications which covered the incident. Unlike other well-known journalists who we sometimes have to rely on their work alone, Friedman has been the subject of multiple interviews by secondary sources. Perhaps a previous contributor here did not compare the citations before new ones were added and the current version (more fresh material was just added). Moreover, Friedman fits both the  and uthor criteria as her work is frequently cited by other journalists and she has won or been nominated for multiple awards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:A)