Deletion of Dhaka (film)

Comment: On top of passing  for an unreleased film, {{u|1l2l3k}} makes the clear point citing  ('''''Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines. Similarly, films produced in the past which were either not completed or not distributed should not have their own articles, unless their failure was notable per the guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NFF)

Comment: Principal photography has begun, but more saliently in this case production itself is notable (independent coverage from multiple ) (e.g. The Hollywood Reporter, Deadline, Variety
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Passes  since principle photography has begun and the sources included are reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: the film has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and therefore passes  and , regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILM)