Deletion of Nichole Alden

Comment: fails  as well as MUSICBIO; she has no |significant coverage, even at ''AllMusic''. She falls into 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:UPANDCOMING)

Comment: No significant coverage found in reliable sources; does not appear to meet  or  (arguably #10 of the latter guideline, but there's no optimal redirect target) at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Please remember that ''notability'' is not the same as ''popularity''.  Alden's popularity has not seemed to result in the generation of |reliable sources from which to build a |verifiable article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: The only criterion of  she comes even close to is (as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: The fact that Alden has an MTV artist page means that http://www.mtv.com/artists/about/ she decided to create one.  An MTV artist page is about as hard to create as a MySpace page -- any artist of any talent level can create their own page.  Collaboration with major advertisers only shows that she has found a useful way to make money with her music, not that she's notable for it.  And for that matter, we really have no independent source to |verify that the ads in question are using Alden's music; we have only some YouTube videos that ''claim'' the music is Alden's.  Inclusion in a film soundtrack would be notable, if the film itself were notable.  However, inclusion in trailers, and in ads for TV shows (but not in the film or TV show proper) doesn't really make the notability cut.  And finally, NickCitizen, Wikipedia is not a 'VIP' club.  But it is an encyclopedia of |verifiable facts, and without significant independent sources covering Alden, there are no sources from which to verify any facts about her, so her article can't be retained
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)