Deletion of 2019 Tacoma attack

Comment: per  covered in press in BBC as well.  Once notable-always notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: A summary here is that  and  are unambiguously for removal while  and  support retention. There are more keep !votes, but this isn't a vote - so I'd ask when this is eventually closed, unless new arguments are brought forward, and regardless of which way the closer chooses to act, that they are clear about these four policies, how they interact and what should be considered when  conflicts with  in a news-related article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:RAPID||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP1E||WP:RAPID)

Comment: per . Widely covered, on-going national level coverage - e.g. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/07/19/ice-detention-center-attacker-killed-by-police-was-an-avowed-anarchist-authorities-say/ WaPo on 19 July
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: based on , tbh I’m not sure it passes  anyway so  might be overkill
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NCRIME||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: broad coverage: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/13/us/tacoma-detention-center-shooting.html The New York Times, https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/07/14/armed-man-throwing-incendiary-devices-ice-detention-center-killed-officer-involved-shooting-police-say/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bf5a4e49b07a Washington Post, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48978394 BBC, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/14/man-dies-as-police-shootout-follows-firebomb-attack-on-immigration-centre The Guardian, https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/07/13/police-man-killed-attempted-tacoma-immigration-prison-attack/1724178001/ USA Today. You can't get much more  coverage than that. Also, no critical  concerns because the suspected perpetrator is named in these reliable soures
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIVERSE||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: Appears to be one event by the person, lacking enduring historical significance, and a routine news event considering no one but the protester was injured. It certainly hit the news for a day as anything related to ICE detention centers is news at this moment. But will we remember him tomorrow? Doesn’t get close to , and doesn’t even belong in the antifa article as there is no actual evidence of any relationship to antifa
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)

Comment: NYT - July 13. Washington Post - July 13. BBC - July 14. Guardian - July 14. USA Today - July 13. Every bit of national or international coverage was day of or the following day. No follow-through. Thus  and  - let's see if anybody cares outside Washington on August 1 and then maybe there's a case for an article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: passes  as there has been significant news coverage on a large scale. Article is well cited with reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: Meet .Also meet  and as numerous international sources wrote about the attack for example BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48978394
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: The principles of  are passed. Also meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:RS)