Deletion of SentinelOne

Comment: https://www.scmagazine.com/sentinelone-epp-endpoint-protection-platform/review/7035/ This review in scmagazine is a review of a product and not the company. The topic is the company and the article contains no information on the company and fails . The ieee.org citation is actually citing a blog post by Sentinal One and this fails  as well providing no information on the company thereby also failing . Similarly, the "interesting paper" only mentions SentinalOne in the context of ''Application programming interface (API) calls, often used to characterize the behavior of a program, are a common input choice for a classifier and used by products such as SentinelOne.'' and '' Some real-world next generation antimalware products (such as SentinelOne) are hybrid classifiers'' and are therefore mentions-in-passing and also fail 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: does not meet  / . A highly promotional piece on an un-and-coming company that has not achieved anything significant just yet (apart from raising venture funding). That's an insufficient claim of significance. Sources is mostly routine funding news and / or .  per review of available sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Appears to not have any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)