Deletion of Book store shoplifting (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nomination just repeats the previous nomination and so is vexatious per , "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''"  It is easy to find more substantial sources on the topic including ''https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/jul/24/strange-world-of-book-thefts-beatrix-potter-zizek Beatrix Potter-pinching and Žižekian swipes: the strange world of book thefts'' and ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=mdx0DQAAQBAJ Stealing Books in Eighteenth-Century London''.  See ; ; ; ; , &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELAFD||WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: meets  per its 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: as , stand by what I said in previous afd, a tad disappointed that article has not developed more of a world view ("well coola, what's stopping you?":)) but this is no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)