Deletion of Extitution

Comment: per nom and . Until such time as the topic catches on a little more mainstream and secondary sources which can be used to build an article are released, this article is not necessary. It is a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per nom. This appears to be a neologism that has, at least at present, very little if any mainstream recognition. BEFORE searches turn up essentially nothing besides what the nominator has listed. I'm not sure that at this point there is sufficient material for anything beyond (somewhat poorly) defining the term, which would fall afoul of ; it is also a fail of the GNG at this time due to the complete lack of independent, secondary reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICDEF)