Deletion of Jay Freeman

Comment: I don't believe the sources provided above meet the threshold of either subject emphasis (about the article subject specifically, rather than passing mention or discussion of projects that have independent notability) or importance (no NYT-like profile or similar caliber.) With neither of these conditions met I don't think it meets  requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree with the nominator. This is a three time speedy deleted article. Subject coverage is fairly trivial and he is not the focus of any of sources. For example, the ibtimes interview isn't about Freeman; it's about various other topics he gives his opinion on. He seems great at getting media attention, but the depth of coverage is very minor and not in depth. I don't think this meets  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)