Deletion of Fanne Foxe

Comment: to Wilbur Mills#Scandal and retirement.   without enough publicly relevant detail to warrant a separate biography.  http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Fanne+Foxe%22&cf=all Google News search mentioned by Dekkappi is an unintentionally good example: almost all the articles after 1975 only mention her in the context of someone who was once found with a a Congressman, not notable in her own right &mdash; see http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Fanne+Foxe%22+-House+-Chairman+-Congressman+-Mills&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a Google News search with "House", "Chairman", "Congressman", and "Mills" blocked.  Details of this person's life are not notable; she just got caught being a seedy friend of a Congressman, and being a seedy friend of a Congressman is no more notable in and of itself than being a stripper.  She's no Lee Harvey Oswald; she's not even Monica Lewinsky, who got far more extensive coverage than Foxe without even attemtping to be a public show off.  In short, there's nothing useful to be said about Foxe that won't fit easily in one section of a parent article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: signficant footnotee (is that a word?) in history, HUGE |newsmaker throughout the 1970s, and not just famous for one news cycle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)