Deletion of Brandon Academy Private School

Comment: article definitely needs work and could be improved substantially. It's a long-standing tradition to refer to  as an excuse for deleting an article, without specifying what part of  is being violated by the existence of this article, and we are not left unfulfilled in this regard. However, this must be the first time a nominator justifies an AfD because the article violates his/her perceived version of "wiki etiquette
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: per Nish. Unlike High schools, which are usually deemed notable by default, this is a private elementary school which does not appear all that notable. I found 309 unique out of 753Ghits for "Brandon Academy" + florida, including many directory listings. I found nothing to indicate any notability per  or  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:SCHOOL)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: This is not a high school; it only goes up to the 8th grade. No independent |reliable sources are provided. Also, the article appears to be misnamed, since the proper name of the school appears to be just "Brandon Academy" (it is a private school, but that's not part of the name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: What does the length of a URL for a redirect for another article have to do with this school's nomination for deletion?  I'm concerned that you're simply out to get the user who created these articles.  Please |do not bite the newcomers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)