Deletion of Daniel Reeves (mathematician)

Comment: He does have some high-citation papers (aven normalizing for which field they're in), and ordinarily that would be enough. But to me that's mitigated by a couple of other points: (1) they were apparently all written when he was a student (e.g. although the journal publication date of his highest-cited paper is 2007, it also has a 1999 working paper version, and he was a student until 2005), so it is hard to disentangle his contribution to their impact from his more senior co-authors; (2) there is very little sign of notability for anything he's done since then (http://www.eecs.umich.edu/eecs/about/articles/2013/Beeminder.html this is the only in-depth independent source I know of for Beeminder, although it in turn cites a WSJ article that mentions the system more briefly), and (3) because of the lack of secondary sources it is difficult to write a properly sourced article about the subject, and per  articles about living people need good sources. I'm willing to change my mind if we get better secondary sources about what he has been doing since graduating, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This looks actually a lot more like a CS/econ researcher than a mathematician, as David Eppstein notes. I think the citation rate is high enough to justify #C1, but will defer to David Eppstein's opinion when he offers one, since CS is his field. I will go edit the article to recharacterize the subject as a computer scientist, but will refrain from moving the article until the AFD is complete, if it should be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)