Deletion of Whitechapel Gods (2nd nomination)

Comment: meets  with the 3 reviews in the article ie. "1.The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself." I have also found this which may contribute to its notability https://books.google.com.au/books?id=EAkrBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109&dq=Whitechapel+Gods+reviews&source=bl&ots=xgD3ukLsse&sig=KLH1o88FwaqWTfvW8bieNTNZbMQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAjgeahUKEwjc8Ju_gurGAhVHfaYKHZwJCjg#v=onepage&q=Whitechapel%20Gods%20reviews&f=false - ''Determining the Roots of Steampunk: A Comparison of Contemporary Works with Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Forerunners of Speculative fiction'' by Matthew Delman appearing in ''Presentations of the 2010 Upstate Steampunk Extravaganza and Meetup'' pages 83 to 110, which is unfortunately incomplete (damn you google books!:)) but in his conclusion states "The high-level mechanical and steam-powered technology the likes of which Verne and Wells composed in their seminal novels make an appearance throughout the entirety of Steampunk literature. The steam-powered Boiler Men of ''Whitechapel Gods'', ... all of these fictional innovations exist because of the technology of the Nineteenth Century
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: due to satisfying  as the book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works (reviews) independent of the book itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)