Deletion of Sergio Archangeslky

Comment: Meets  points two, three, and five. Point one would be satisfied if independent sources existed. While the article would be better with independent sources, professional sources are fine for uncontroversial info
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: He's only a corresponding member, not full member, of the National Academy of Sciences of Argentina, so the case for #C3 is present but weak. I think the case for #C1 is clearer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per arguments above, also clearly meets #1 with an h-index of 46 and 7k citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: and move to '''Sergio Archangelsky''' (correcting spelling mistake in title).  Lots of breadth in highly cited publications in what I believe to be a medium-to-low citation field looks like a pass of  C1 to me; I also believe that the membership in the argentine academy of sciences may pass  C3 (although I am having trouble parsing the various levels of membership).  The article needs some work, but as usual, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF||WP:DINC)