Deletion of Phase One Network

Comment: as per AllyD's rationale. The article is a stub that is sourced almost completely by primary sources only. No third-party coverage from independent RS to indicate notability. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I tagged this for notability and lack of references in 2016 and these remain in place. It was deleted a week ago after a Prod by another user but has now been restored on request from a new user who https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AExplicit&type=revision&diff=982018657&oldid=981946839 appears to be from the company. Regarding the weblinks that the user supplied in their Restore request on {{u|Explicit}}'s Talk page, these are primary sites, Discogs and a Huffpost contributor Q&A with the company founder. These are far from sufficient for . Searches find passing mentions of this firm being the rights agency for this or that work, but I am not seeing the |coverage about the firm needed to demonstrate attained |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:RS||:WP:NCORP)