Deletion of International Wildlife Film Festival

Comment: because this film festival is notable, as shown by decades of coverage in |reliable sources.  Simply use the handy Google News Archive tool above to verify the vast number of sources readily available.  I recommend that the nominator review  and follow its wise precepts.  When reliable sources on a notable topic are readily available, add the best of them to the article instead of nominating the article for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Actually, contrary to the nomination statement, the article ''did'' contain a very reliable source published by a university press at the time of nomination: the one that I added when I removed the  tag
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)

Comment: I've expanded the article and added a number of references from |reliable sources.  I do not think that pointing out such an excellent recommendation as  constitutes "lambasting" and I am always happy to expand and reference articles on interesting and notable topics when I have the time.  Thanks to Swpb for urging me to do so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BEFORE)