Deletion of What Every Science Student Should Know

Comment: I strongly suspect we have some   going on here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOTPROMOTION)

Comment: Adequate sourcing just does not exist.   No prejudice against creating an article if the book receives sufficient reviews, or feature story coverage, or otherwise becomes notable at some future date
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The book has not been published yet and  applies at this stage. However, even if I set that aside, the book may not fulfil . It definitely fails points 2,3,4,5. For point 1, it would need articles in sources (independent of the authors/publisher) which discuss the book itself in detail - and not mention it in the context of an author writing a book. The Yonhap article seems to be independent and reliable, but it doesn't address the book in detail. The Dartmouth alumni magazine article discusses the book, but is connected to the authors. At this stage, it seems  to have an article about this book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:BKCRIT||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: although it's not published yet the amount of coverage is sufficient to satisfy  (barely). Disregarding Yonhap because one of the authors is Korean is like disregarding AP when it reports about Americans - this is no small-town newspaper focusing on village matters. I also disagree with LaMona's interpretation of the other sources; a detailed report on the book's publishing process definitely should be considered coverage of the book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: does  apply here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION)