Deletion of List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair

Comment: I think the nominator is perfectly entitled to renominate this, since consensus on whether this subject is appropriate and/or notable |can change within two years. For what it's worth, I don't agree with the closer's statement in the previous Afd. Most of Colonel Warden's sources are either definitions or incidental, which only go to prove that it exists not that it's in anyway notable. I was more convinced by Milowent's references which did provide some analysis on the subject. Also, the statement ''"as long as it is substantiated in reliable sources"'' clearly goes against the policy for |what Wikipedia is not, something which is not superseded by the |general notability guideline. There might be a case for a DIR|non-encyclopedic cross-categorisation if consensus exists for that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC||WP:NOT||WP:GNG||WP:NOTDIR)