Deletion of Halabos na hipon

Comment: Weak nomination rationale apart (being a stub is no reason to delete; |"unencyclopedic" is a known fallacy): it is cited a lot in cuisine books https://www.google.com/search?q=Halabos+na+hipon&btnG=Cerca+nei+libri&tbm=bks&tbo=1&hl=it#q=Halabos+na+hipon&safe=off&hl=it&tbm=bks&ei=a_3CUYaoDeew4QS0iYCYAg&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.48175248,d.bGE&fp=285fa19323813c32&biw=1482&bih=807 -it can be presumed there are reasonable sources in the original (Filipino?) language about it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYC)

Comment: The nomination addresses only the quality of the current article: that is not a reason for deletion. (Also, it's taken as read that the nominator supports deletion.  Per , you shouldn't add a bolded !vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:DISCUSSAFD)