Deletion of CyanogenMod (2nd nomination)

Comment: I have still not seen ''significant coverage in |reliable sources''. If it is a notable mod, then I would expect to see more coverage than blog posts and forums! Preaching about how good it is out it's notability without giving reasons why is useless, and dismissing this as fanboiism ridiculous. Is there ''any'' coverage in a reputable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: while it is trivially easy to verify the existence of CyanogenMod, I cannot find coverage in |independent third-party reliable sources, even though I've searched google, yahoo, and the websites of all the mobile handset magazines I can find (not one of which has any coverage). So, despite how popular it appears to be, Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are clear that if something has not received significant coverage in reliable, third party sources it does not get a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Lacks independent |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)