Deletion of The Anomalist

Comment: A google search of ''"Patrick Huyghe" "The Anomalist"'' brings up quite a bit. For example this http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/reviews/reviews_15_2_houran.pdf book review from ''Journal of Scientific Exploration'' would be a controversial source. It has a write-up in an Encyclopediahttp://books.google.com/books?id=ma20lQsUdhQC&pg=PT103 but we can't use other encyclopedia's as a sign of notability (they include everything by design). There are many other tangential citations on Google Books within the framework of fringe ideas, but they are not cites in "academic or scholarly works" per Wikipedia:Notability (periodicals). There's no mainstream or scholarly coverage or citations. It does exist in 10 libraries but that is not much.http://www.worldcat.org/title/anomalist/oclc/60625334 If this wasn't fringe science I would be more inclined to Keep (due to it being known within a specialty), but due to the nature of  and lack of mainstream citation or coverage I am leaning to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)