Deletion of Mark Friedman

Comment: It's classic . JzG is dead-on in spotting the ''Guardian'' article as just being churnalism. Sources 4 and 5 are dead for me, but they look unlikely to actually name this person, let alone discuss him in any detail. The article in ''Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice'' is a little more, though it arguably tends more towards a finding of notability for the concept of results-based accountability. But we're not discussing that subject here, we're discussing Friedman, who would appear to fail all relevant notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)