Deletion of The Rotary Club of Milton

Comment: or '''Merge''' to  Milton, Ontario. I disagree with Gorgan almighty that the club has received significant coverage to pass . It has received many mentions in the local paper, but seemingly no significant coverage - only mentions of what the organisation is doing. As  states, the coverage would need to include sources outside of the local area for the group to be notable. The most sensible solution in my opinion is to take a few of the best sources and use them to reference the material already included at Milton,_Ontario#Service_Clubs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:BRANCH)

Comment: the word "local" appears in neither , nor , and only once in . If there is a consensus that "local" sources are not reliable or should be used to establish notability, it would be best to say so in the guidelines and policies. Special:Contributions/24.24.214.15|24.24.214.15
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: This is a laudable but run-of-the-mill local service club. I mean that respectfully; it's a good club full of good people, but it does not meet the criteria for a separate article in an international encyclopedia. I personally belong to a local Kiwanis club which is older than this one and has done more notable stuff, but I would never dream of creating an article about it. See : "As a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article - unless they are substantially discussed by '''reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BRANCH)

Comment: the 'weak' is a sop to the authors, because the Club evidently has a strong relationship with the (reputable) local newspaper and, unlike many articles about companies and organisations, there are plenty of news articles cited. I can see some effort has been expended to create a passable article. However,  applies here, some evidence of regional or national attention is required. If one regional or national news source could be found, I'd change my 'vote' to "weak keep". It is clear at the moment the article's intention is to promote a local club, of no significance outside the town
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: the standard to be applied here is  (as has been pointed out), along with the understanding that for the purposes of , multiple publications from the same source are to be considered one source. So the long list of references from the same newspaper doesn't actually do much to establish notability. There's plenty of local coverage, but nothing to suggest the club is recognised as a significant organisation beyond that town.  comes to mind and the section ''Audience'' at  covers that more specifically. Unless significant regional or national coverage can be found, I think this is going to be a struggle. I also have OTWEBHOST concerns about long sections of local club history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:N||WP:LOCAL||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NOTWEBHOST)