Deletion of Gravity in meta-analysis

Comment: 1)''' Yes.  It's .  Note that it says articles ''should'' have more than one external source, but not that articles ''need'' to have more than one reliable source.  '''(2)''' I understand that but the question is who has the burden of proof: the person who says it isn't notable, or the person who says it is?  Again there's Wikipedia policy on that, which is .  That policy says unreferenced material should be cut, so the burden of proof is on the person who says it '''is''' notable to provide |verifiable references from |reliable sources to prove their case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BURDEN||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: WP:N|non-notable subject; |original research; only two |possible primary sources exist.  When |secondary sources become available, it can be re-created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:RS)