Deletion of Sanderson's First Law

Comment: as above (might want to edit down/combine with his Second Law). A web search shows the phrase is widely used in fantasy fandom (blogs, forums, sites like TVTropes).  It may be possible to find passing mentions in  sources (e.g. published book reviews in specialist journals) if you look hard enough, but it doesn't come close to notability requirements for a stand-alone article (notability would require detailed discussion not just mention and definition
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Per rationales above. No references on Google Books, Google Scholar, Newsbank, Trove but plenty of references available in other sources.  If the section became big enough to independently spinoff because of |undue weight in a biography and emergence of media coverage or academic coverage, no bias against undoing and having it back as stand alone
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)