Deletion of Fractional quantum mechanics

Comment: clear  violation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: including Fractional Poisson process. This is a bit of a tricky case, since references do exist, and some of them might even qualify as |independent, |secondary sources. But the sheer extent of the |COI means that we can't ''trust'' any of the material to be worth keeping and editing. For example, every bullet point under "Further reading" in multiple pages would have to be checked to make sure it's actually about the page topic, rather than merely using similar-sounding terminology. Every historical statement and claim of credit would have to be interrogated, and the selection of topics couldn't be taken to indicate a third-party assessment of what's interesting. (None of the "Physical applications" in Fractional Schrödinger equation are ''physical'' applications, for instance; they're all equations for the sake of equations, with one model thrown in that makes a gesture at ''possible'' relevance to an actual physical system.) I'm all for articles on niche topics, but these pages amount to |using Wikipedia as a personal website. Volunteers who can work on specialized physics content are in short supply, and every minute spent cleaning up after somebody's ego is a waste of a scarce resource. In short, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDY||WP:SECONDARY||WP:COI||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:TNT)