Deletion of IPod touch Fans

Comment: i.e. do not keep in current form) after removing most of the content which is derived from the site itself or trivial mentions that do not directly address the subject there is not much left. However the one |reliable source is probably enough to support either a very short |stub (until such time that more sourcing becomes available) or an entry in a list or article on the broader topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:STUB)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Hardly any |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: None of the sources establish notability. To establish notability, the secondary sources must be ''about'' the subject. A mere mention in a reference pointing to the existence of this website does not establish notability. Wikipedia is not a  of every website ever created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: and '''|salt''' — (edit conflict) I fully agree with the following that was said in the deletion review: ''I would suggest working on the article in User space until it's complete and fully cited''. And ''cited'' means via |verifiable, third-party sources. Source #1 is a traffic site, not verifiable. Source #2 provides trivial coverage at best. Source #3 is only a WHOIS on the site. Source #4 is a primary source. Source #5 is not only directly related to this site, but also seems like a blog entry. Source #6 is a blog, not verifiable. #7 is merely a drive-by mention of a user on the site. I have no clue of what #8 is supposed to be. I do not see any mention of the site in #9. #10, #11, and #12 are all forum posts from its own site. #13 and #14 are both drive-by mentions from blogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)