Deletion of Frederic B. Pratt

Comment: He seems to be a leader of industry and gets a few credit points for being related to someone important and being the president of that institution is remarkable however he got the job.  There are many  hits for him in the ''New York Times'' archive, more than passing coverage, including coverage of his death http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0716FF3F5F1B7B93C6A9178ED85F418485F9.  AFD isn't the place for sourcing issues, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Bad case of . The leadership of the Pratt Institute can go to that article, and the bit about the AOC predecessor to the relevant article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)

Comment: Passes  C6: "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Pratt was not an academic. Thus references to  are irrelevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: See my argument above. Clearly passes  Criterion 6. And I'm working on improving the referencing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)