Deletion of Jake Turx (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets basic  and has lot's of credible references.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Yes, someone with the username {{u|Turx Jake}} on his 2nd edit here tried to link Turx's personal email in the article. While unprofessional, and defying the rules and etiquette (not unlike Jake Turx#Trump press conference incident|that press conference incident), it's not a reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater. While more sourcing would be nice, the article was written and survived a previous Afd based on what's already there. Other issues can be resolved with copyedits. White House press corps#Correspondents|This list has many unlinked names on it, and  that's because just being a WH correspondent, especially for an obscure publication like Ami, or even being the author of some obscure book, generally wouldn't pass GNG. If Trump's response to the question had been , we would have had a MILL subject, but instead we now have Turx forever seared into our memories with that train wreck of an exchange. The acrimonious tone of the response, directed at an Orthodox person, served to highlight Trump's awkward situation of enjoying support from both http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/250068 Orthodox Jews and the Alt-right, the latter accused of fomenting some of the antisemitism Turx asked the president about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: Does not meet . I do not believe this individual is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)