Deletion of NTI Tension Suppression System

Comment: I'm going to go with "keep" on this.  There's http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/22 this systematic review, and that review alone identifies 17 review articles covering NTI.  The device receives nontrivial coverage in http://www.amazon.com/Functional-Occlusion-TMJ-Smile-Design/dp/0323033717 this and http://www.amazon.com/Management-Temporomandibular-Disorders-Occlusion-7e/dp/0323082203 this, both legit-looking textbooks.  There's enough independent reliable secondary source coverage to write an article,  is satisfied.  Yes the existing article has problems and Tepi you started to fix them, which is appreciated, but generally, the fact that there are some problems with the existing article (which article doesn't?) isn't a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)