Deletion of The Bugman and Gaylord

Comment: in accordance with #A7. No evidence of notability and no sources to support such a claim
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: per  and  as article should either be improved further or merged and redirected to C.O.P.S.#Characters_in_the_series, which would benefit from at least the lead sentence of this article.  Because we , it is clearly not a hoax and certainly not libelous.  There is nothing to protect the public from here.  By contrast, we actually improve another article and make searching convenient for our readers who come here interested in these characters by allowing for a path to the other article.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE||WP:AGF)

Comment: Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it.  The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  |Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.  Note, am now copying this to all characters from this same series, since all of the articles are quite full and well done
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: WP:PLOT|Excessive plot summary and |trivia that does not show any WP:burden|reliable third-party sources. It's also mostly |original research based upon some youtube videos
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:OR)