Deletion of Michigan–Northwestern football rivalry

Comment: If this is a football rivalry, coverage specific to that topic sufficient to pass the  guideline needs to be located per  ({{tq|A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject}}).  In this case, such independent coverage and citations about the topic might include coverage of memorable games played in the rivalry, callouts of memorable events or plays in the rivalry, players and coaches discussing the rivalry, quotes about the rivalry, reporting of W-L records of coaches within the rivalry, and similar content which is directly framed as a football rivalry
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per nom. The series is just too lopsided for there to be anything more than a feeble token shadow of a wisp of a rivalry. As the nom has noted, the only news of this so-called rivalry is the unveiling of a trophy commemorating it. The fact that other Big Ten rivalry articles exist may just indicate that some of them should go too. In any case,  is no argument to make
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: there is more than enough to surpass . Everything else is just "song and dance" -- but I don't dance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: none of the secondary coverage calls this a "rivalry," and we don't keep articles about two teams which just play each other a bunch of times, even if all their games receive secondary coverage. The trophy probably deserves its own article, it may be  for that coverage-wise but that might be an IAR keep, but this is clearly not a "rivalry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)