Deletion of Latha Walpola

Comment: I understand the delete rationale but when looking into it further, it does appear there is available coverage in reliable sources, despite the origins of the article and its content. To point out,  and, as others have stated, considering the country and time period, there is enough coverage to make a claim of notability. Certainly not a slam-dunk like a Grammy winner, but enough to have a place here on the English Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: although relatively poorly written (in serious need of copy-editing) the subject of the article is notable & satisfies a number of the criteria under  . Given the era in which she performed it is hard to track reliable online sources but there are a number that reinforce her notability. http://www.thesundayleader.lk/archive/20080504/review.htm, http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2014/11/16/mon02.asp, http://www.island.lk/2007/11/24/satmag4.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)