Deletion of Atlantis (Stargate)

Comment: Those darn |verifiable sources; the article is so well written and should be included in this encyclopedia directly commenting on its content! Sources are surely out there, and surely substantiate much of the information in this article. The subject matter and sheer fact that this is a legitimate sub-article of a section from the main series is relevant to the series with in this encyclopedia. That said, the article does need solid verifiable sources to steer it away from  and , and at present it does not and so I must put myself in the delete argument for the time being.  I surely hope you can find some more sources before the AfD closure at which time I will re-evaluate my position
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Fails #PLOT. May be worthwhile to summarize into the the Stargate mythos article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as a lot of other editors have noted, we need to do more than just verify in-universe plot elements. See #PLOT. We need something to . There's nothing independent and reliable to really say whether this is notable. The quality AND quantity of coverage matters, and articles that are merely thesize together various descriptions gleaned from the story can't meet the  or policy on what Wikipedia is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SYN||WP:GNG||WP:NOT||WP:verify notability)