Deletion of List of creatures in Primeval (3rd nomination)

Comment: Same reason as the last two AFDs were defeated. What has changed since then? The show is cancelled, the deletionists are the only ones active now. Well, how about :Category:Lists of fictional animals by work? Will these all be deleted? If not, why just this one? I know about , but a category of 27 articles indicates a consensus allowing this type of article. Special:Contributions/202.81.248.238|202.81.248.238
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: The concept of ''Primeval'' was driven by the success of ''Walking with Dinosaurs'' and, while the human stars are important, the real stars of the series are the dinosaurs. There are simply too many to include in the the main article so this article was created. The article doesn't just cover the creatures from ''Primeval'', it also includes creatures from its spinoff, ''Primeval: New World''. As {{u|202.81.248.238}} has alluded to, nothing has changed since the article was kept at two previous AfDs. The content can't be merged back to the main series article as it would bloat that article significantly, even if any non-encyclopaedic content was removed. The nominator is incorrect in stating that "most of the information is made up of |plot details". In fact, much of the article consists of descriptions of the real creature and comparisons between the real and fictional versions of each creature, with some plot information naturally included. It should also be noted that more than 50% of citations used in the article are secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: This is obviously an appendix to the main article about the show so there's a clear |alternative to deletion — merger back into that article.  There's more real world information in this case than you get in most such fictional lists because these creatures were, for the most part, real at one time and we have articles about them.  Compare daleks, ewoks, klingons, &c.  The general notability of this sort of material may be seen in sources such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=N8qXUT06WucC Dinosaurs in Fantastic Fiction
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)