Deletion of Nuclear 9/11

Comment: This article concerns a neologism for a set of hypothetical events that are based entirely on speculation (largely by individuals who have no background in defense or counter-terrorism). i can think of a number of reasons why this sort of article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia but do not wish to articulate them all; to give one there is the  guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: redirect to Nuclear terrorism). So ridiculously speculative, I can't believe some people actually voted to keep it. From : ''Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. ... Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and "future history" are original research and therefore inappropriate.'' I'm also pretty sure  doesn't cover sensationalist article headlines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RS)

Comment: Sounds like it could have been a  candidate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)