Deletion of Goldmoney

Comment: Zero indications of notability, most of the article is taken up with promoting the company, fails . None of the references are intellectually independent, relying on company announcements or articles based on company announcements or quotations from company officers. References fail  and/or . On a connected note, I've also nominated Roy Sebag article for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: u|Jtbobwaysf}}, the standard for references that may be used to establish notability goes beyond mere . Take a read of  and  in particular, but the references must be intellectually independent. The references you have listed below are not, as they all rely on company announcements or rely extensively on interviews with company officers. For example, https://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2015/may/31/bitgold-new-standard-digital-currency this Guardian story entitled "Spinning gold into dollars: how BitGold intends to become a new standard" relies completely on an interview with Josh Crumb with no intellectually independent opinion or analysis (therefore not intellectually independent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I understand that BitGold  and GoldMoney are the same publically traded company https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitgold-inc-acquires-goldmoney-com-cad-52-million-1432675285/. Why are there two Wikipedia entries? The article GoldMoney article itself has pretty awful sourcing, but there are results in a quick google search for bitgold as well as for goldmoney. When I count both articles, I found a few sources for Huffington Post, The Guardian, CoinDesk, and Bloomberg which are all  thus this appears to meet . I agree the article is promotional in nature, but promotional is not (as far as I know) a cause for deletion of the article (rather it should be cause for deletion of content). Maybe we should first merge the two articles and cut all the promo fluff
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)