Deletion of Dwile flonking

Comment: Probably being a hoax is fine if the article states that people think it's a hoax. That's implied at current, and could be expanded to become explicit (though I won't do it myself). Also looks to me like it barely squeaks past 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes Wikipedia's threshold of |notability having received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources: http://books.google.com/books?id=yjw4iA8njTEC&pg=PT118&dq=Dwile+flonking&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pRP4UeW3M4au9ATlx4EI&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Dwile%20flonking&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=CmIPbrzaWe4C&pg=PA26&dq=Dwile+flonking&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pRP4UeW3M4au9ATlx4EI&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Dwile%20flonking&f=false, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7777836/Dwile-Flonking-council-bans-traditional-pub-sport-under-health-and-safety.html, http://books.google.com/books?id=NWu6sLJn7-kC&pg=PA105&dq=Dwile+flonking&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pRP4UeW3M4au9ATlx4EI&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Dwile%20flonking&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=q-QnAQAAIAAJ&q=Dwile+flonking&dq=Dwile+flonking&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pRP4UeW3M4au9ATlx4EI&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBA, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/courant/access/931545702.html?dids=931545702:931545702&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Jan+21%2C+1967&author=&pub=Hartford+Courant&desc=Sounds+Like+Boozy+%27Ring+Around+Rosie%27&pqatl=google (shorter article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)