Deletion of Megan Nicole (2nd nomination)

Comment: though recommending '''Redirect to List of YouTube personalities if deleted'''. The two sources presented by Cunard demonstrate Megan's notability under the general guidelines, but I'm on the fence about as a musician. While having reliable, independent sources (and the two here are the best we've seen yet on Megan) is one criterion under , and those guidelines state that at least one of the criteria must be met, it also says “''may'' be notable”. To me, at least one other criterion should be met, whether it be, among others: having a song on the ''Billboard'' Hot 100, Heatseekers or other songs-based charts; being at least nominated for a music-based award; or releasing an album on Bad Boy Records, the label she is signed to. I'd even be more convinced if any of her music was prominently showcased on television, and not just the Internet. But as of now, she still has yet to qualify under the more stringent  guidelines. As for the two sources that have come to light: I deem them acceptable to at least include Megan in the List of YouTube personalities (will try to add her there now), with a redirect should her own article fail to stay on Wikipedia.  The redirect request was mentioned in another Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Nicole|AfD nomination, but apparently was not accepted due to lack of sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: She meets the  without any need to consider  as there is significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The VIBE Vixen is business as usual news of a label signing.  But the Strait Times, Houston Chronicle, and News Tribune articles are all substantial and treat Nicole as the primary subject of the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)