Deletion of My Only Wish (This Year) (2nd nomination)

Comment: satisfies the |GNG. The nominator doesn't seem to have provided a compelling reason for deletion, and I fail what is to be gained from deleting a well-referenced, reasonably solid article such as this.  Surely a |GAR is the correct forum for concerns about its GA status?&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GAR)

Comment: to ''Platinum Christmas'', the song's parent album. There appears to be no ''significant'' coverage for this song in independent |reliable sources, therefore it fails . However, the subject is not an unreasonable search term, and  notes that songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article "should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." I !vote to redirect to the album article over the main Britney Spears article because of the song's holiday focus/content, and that it was originally released as part of the album. Given an either/or choice between keeping or deleting, I would !vote to keep per : "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." No exact threshold is given, though the guideline goes on to say that "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged." Merging would not be appropriate per , and besides, I would suggest that the article in its current state is already "reasonably detailed" enough to be sufficiently beyond a stub
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NSONGS||WP:NSONGS||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: So what, the song has charted, thus passing . What else does the article have, really? Credits for the song and a little bit of reception. It blows my mind that this article is a GA, when it shouldn't even have been created in the first place. It's nothing more than a well-written stub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: Aside from the liner notes and sheet music, each source's mention of the song is trivial – what's quoted in the article is everything that was relevant.  A Factiva search reveals about a dozen more newspaper items in which the song is discussed in about six words as part of a much larger review of new holiday music releases. So there is coverage of the topic, but not ''significant'' coverage, thus I don't believe |GNG has been satisfied
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the song does not fail . Plus, it has charted two years on Denmark and apperead on Billboard Holiday/Seasonal Digital Song. And the article is already a GA
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)