Deletion of Tochnog professional

Comment: per |current policy; the sources provided look good, but on insectin give neither heat nor light. They comprise WP:MILL, SPS, primary or passing mentions. Fails NCORP and BASIC; also pretty much flying in the face of . Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:NOTMANUAL)

Comment: The article promotes a software product, and describes its use - it has no ''independent'' assessment of it. It has been written by an owner of the company that developed and sells it. The references are primary research papers which (I assume - I am unable to check) acknowledge use of the software, rather than discussing it. The existence of articles such as DIANA FEA does not warrant the existence of other equally poor articles - see . If this unfairness is a problem, DIANA FEA should also go to AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHER)

Comment: edited by a |single purpose account this is just advertisng/ PR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)