Deletion of Vijay Dahiphale

Comment: The two brief mentions in the ''Times of India'' already cited as sources in the article are neither in-depth enough for  nor enough to |verify the claims in the article, and no other form of notability is evident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: as there's no evidence that the subject passes , and the article looks like a case of .  Brief mentions in newspapers, even The Times of India, is not enough to pass .   is not applicable as the subject has not carried out any major academic research at any point in his career. — Stringy Acid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RESUME||WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: he does some academic work but doesn't meet  criteria for inclusion, and in a more general sense he doesn't meet  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:ANYBIO)