Deletion of Fortanix

Comment: There are no independent secondary sources available for this topic that meet the criteria for establishing notability. I cannot access https://www.wsj.com/articles/fortanix-raises-8-million-for-encryption-technology-1497439800 this wsj article so I cannot comment, but I note that it was written on the same date (June 14 2017) as http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/fortanix-announces-8-million-investment-from-foundation-capital-neotribe-runtime-encryption-2221806.htm the PR announcement was released by the company and on the same topic. https://intellyx.com/2017/02/20/fortanix-using-intel-sgx-secure-enclaves-to-deliver-unprecedented-cybersecurity/ This intellyz article fails  as it is company-generated PR. The webpage even helpfully states "To be considered for a Brain Candy article, email us at ...". https://foundationcapital.com/enter-fortanix-first-runtime-security-solution/ This foundationcapital article is not "intellectually independent" and fails  since it was written by one of their investors. Finally, http://www.finsmes.com/2017/06/fortanix-raises-8m-in-series-a-funding.html this finsmes article fails  for the same reason at it is a PR announcement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Start-up funding announcements and brief proposition coverage are insufficient to demonstrate attained encyclopaedic notability. My searches are not finding better. Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)

Comment: As Kudpung correctly points out, |Wikipedia is not a business directory. The sourcing that is available is not enough to make an article out of because the subject fails  in all of its coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:CORPDEPTH)