Deletion of Semjon Adlaj

Comment: Hopefully sometimes in the future he will be notable, but today he does not pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: GNG||WP:NPROF)

Comment: for now.  Fails both GNG and  at this point in time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: No evidence of passing . If his work is as grand as the above Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|single-purpose account says, then other mathematicians will eventually recognize it, and we can write about him then. (I rather doubt it is, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: No evidence of passing . The only third-party source in the article (mysteriously not linked but online https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.2762 here) is a letter to the editor, by a notable researcher, that is quite critical of one of Adlaj's papers. That paper, Adlaj's most cited, appears in the ''Notices of the AMS'' (more a newsletter than a serious research journal) and only has 23 citations in Google scholar. That is not worth much as a basis for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)