Deletion of Night's Watch

Comment: If, as the nominator states, the content is the same as it was in an article deleted by AfD and it still has the same problems, this would fall into '''G4. Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion.''' As I cannot know for sure since I never read the original article, I have also weighted the individual merits of the article as it is, and the article is unreferenced, the fictional organization does not meet the |general notability guideline and the content is a |plot-only description of a fictional work. ''A Song of Ice and Fire'' may be notable but |notability is not inherited to every |content fork, and this article is an arbitrary content fork and an |unnecessary split
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:ITSA||WP:CFORK||WP:AVOIDSPLIT)