Deletion of 3rd century in Ireland

Comment: an article that is only ever going to be a detailed summary of a single book of legends is never going to be an article on the  3rd century in Ireland. The article could exist as a sub-article of ''Annals of the Four Masters'' but personally, in the absence of any evidence of coverage by |reliable secondary sources I think that such an article would be more suitable for WikiSource as Wikipedia articles #PLOT|shouldn't be plot summaries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: This article is considerably better than the articles on particular years, but a mere list of dates can only be regarded as a stub.  It needs an introduction, explaining that the material comes fro the Annals of the Four Masters, but is regarded by historians as legendary rather than reliable history.  WP has works on fictional books, so I do not see why it should not have articles on legendary events, provided they can be included without any copy-vio.  They are recorded in the annals, which is an authentic source, and meets .  The problem is how far the annasl are to be trusted, but this can adequately be dealt with in comment, such as what
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Fails |verifiability. Also mythological events are described as historical facts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)