Deletion of Nicky Cavella

Comment: and '''transwiki''' (as it seems a shame to lose the information). There is no demonstration of notability (to satisfy ) and no real out-of-universe coverage (to satisfy ) - all we have is a retelling of the plot. Barracuda (comics) and Loony Bin Jim are mentioned in comparison - the latter should just be redirected to the film article as it adds nothing extra there (and fails similar guidelines) and the former has been the focus of their own limited series (so there is a more potential for sources and discussion of the character development) but that is still pretty poor, just with more potential for improvement. All that said,  isn't a good argument - we are discussing what to do with all the comics characters failing the various guidelines - we will be merging a lot to minor character articles and I can see this character being one that will appear there but it would still be trimmed right back. So transwiki to the Marvel Comics wikia as, whatever happens, this can't survive in the form it is in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:WAF||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: no credible postulation of out-of-universe significance or notability. DGG misses the point completely. Notability within a ''fictional'' context does not equal ''encyclopedic'' notability. That has been maintained by the vast majority of editors at , a few stubborn voices of opposition notwithstanding
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: due to an almost total lack of coverage in |reliable secondary sources. http://www.ugo.com/channels/comics/features/hannibaltabu/04_29_05/ This is the best I could find and I don't think it's enough because it's just one short opinion piece from a site that I'm not sure carries a lot of weight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)