Deletion of Mamunul Haque

Comment: after removing content that is not reliably sourced) to political party Khelafat Majlish (to the extent that the merged content is not ). My assessment is that 6 of the 19 cited sources are of dubious reliability (dailysomoyersomikoron.com, probashirdiganta.com, Rtmnews24.com, Insiderion.com, Fact Sider, and Famous Born). That could be fixed by editing. One cited source is a wing of the party he leads, and two are press releases from the party ''Bangla Tribune'' (1 of 2) and ''The Daily Sangram'', so not independent. That leaves six independent, reliable sources that are not "fan sites" of his party: the ''Daily Inqilab'', ''Daily Naya Diganta'' (2), ''Somoyer Konthosor'', ''Bangla Tribune'' (2 of 2), and ''Kaler Kantho''. Their depth of content about him is shallow, however. It is not , it does not address his life directly and in detail. Searches of the usual types found nothing better. So he is not |notable and does not merit a stand alone article. Merge, however, is a reasonable |alternative to deletion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:N||WP:ATD)

Comment: per  . I'm not disappointed with the amount of content found by googling his native name মামুনুল হক. Article might need improving, but article quality is no reason to delete. Maybe see . Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: re|Yahya}} I don't see anything inappropriate from {{u|Owais Al Qarni}}. Article creators are allowed to join AfDs and it's only natural they would try to defend the articles they created. There is nothing wrong with the talk page message either, the message reads, "''He has been elected as the General Secretary of Bangladesh Khelafat Majlis, you can withdraw the nomination''" with few sources added beside. You can leave a note when you suspect sock/meatpuppetry or any inappropriate anvassing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Citations over kill. The article creator left a message on my talk page a few days back, and I was busy in working on the Muhammad Adil Khan article, so I'm here late. I'm not able to assess the sources in article as they're mostly Bengali and I don't understand Bengali but I guess the subject is notable in Bangladesh, as the statement in lede says, he was arrested for so and so, and has so and so positions, which I guess are fine for a Muslim scholar or cleric to be notable, and that too an indication, "presumed to be notable", and that would be a SNG little pass as {{u|ShohagS}} suggested above. This article requires a lot of cleanup but fD is not cleanup|AfD is not cleanup. If multiple sources having little little coverage are combined they may be regarded as a whole as significant coverage. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)