Deletion of Unholy Alliance

Comment: The article is |biased, but that is fixable.  While you are busy trying to make it neutral, you will probably end up making it well-verified in the process.  See #A_vital_component:_good_research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV)

Comment: In order resolve the  issue, the article needs to identify |sources which address the issue of "unholy alliance" as a general concept in the manner that the article does, rather than generating a concept by stringing together quotes calling this or that thing an "unholy alliance" in the course of an article on something else. It is the generality with which the concept is presented, combined with what seems to be a lack of sources on this subject as such, that represents the  problem. Imagine an article on "lunatic" which strung together a series of articles in which certain people were called lunatics and then using them to present a concept using language such as "A lunatic can be a kind of politician, such as insert name of politician here cite article cslling this politician a lunatic here." This article has similar problems with stringing together articles in which the term is used as an epithet in order to present what is essentially an  essay on a concept. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:OR)

Comment: The POV, non-reliable sources, and Original Research is just the tip of the iceberg.... without that material it is little more than a Dictionary Definition re: .  I could see an article on this, but it would require a LOT of clean up.  Better to delete and start from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: this inflammatory piece of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)