Deletion of Sean Bielat (2nd nomination)

Comment: One of the two most credible House challengers in MA this cycle. Bielat's strong showing against Frank had a major influence on Frank's retirement; Congressional Districts were redrawn, and to avoid harm to other Reps., but Frank's old district, the most gerrymandered in the State, had to go; no way around making it much more competitive. Bielat's arm was twisted to re-enter politics, since had the district been as it is now, he would have likely won in '10. Speculation that he will lose because a candidate with money and name, and nothing else has entered the race, or that MA is only Dem. ignores the demographics of the S Shore, and is . No doubt that when Bielat leaves politics, as he did in 2011, he drops off the radar, but his influence extends beyond the two races. Also no doubt that he WILL be in the news for at least another month, that is NOT 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Passes  due to significant coverage received during his 2010 run
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: noting point 3 of : ''although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article".''  Also, if he does indeed lose like you suggest, then I'll most likely vote '''''for''''' deletion as I did in the article's previous AfD.  (Disclosure: I'm a significant contributed to the original article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: It does show a variety of  and , and yes succeeds, . Most political leaders in voting candidacy are informatively suitable to be notable and express independent verification coverage from news and documents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS||WP:GNG)