Deletion of 2004 Estoril Open

Comment: Per  a subject is notable if it is "The final series (or single game when there is not a series) determining the champion of a top league." The ATP and WTA are top leagues and the Estoril Open is a significant tournament as an ATP 250 event. Per , a tennis player is notable if they win even a challenger event and an ATP 250 event is much higher in significance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: simply a tabulation of scores, and . Complete lack of any evidence of anything even vaguely resembling  coverage to make this an encyclopaedia article rather than a scorecard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: the following edtiors !vote "Keeps" appear to have been anvas|canvassed by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Can't say that I see the "pointyness" of this nom, Mtking is just going through sports events having an article that do not meet the guidelines. This one clearly has no enduring notability, as argued. And as Hrafn points out, the current article is just a tabulation of scores. WP is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a directory of every sports event ever held. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I have no interest in commenting on notability and would probably follow consensus there. However, the iness of this nomination, as shown by comments above, is a keep argument. In general deletion decisions are very ill-made by choosing one article at random out of a large set without distinguishing it clearly from the set
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)