Deletion of Anti-Hungarian sentiment (2nd nomination)

Comment: My biggest issue is the nomination stating that the article was recreated using the exact same text as the reviously deleted article. The articles current history does show a degree of evolution. I am not fully convinced that argument is indeed correct. Can an admin who can view deletion history verify this???., That aside as it does not fully impact the current discussion (just may add a bit of perspective to the discussion) as we look at the article today not yesterday anyway. One primary motivation for deletion last time was that the article was full of synthesis and original research. Is that an issue today? This article is referenced albiet these references should be improved. This is mainly due to the article being extremelely POV (borderline still a synth issue, but limited in its OR in my belief) on the selectioning of events discussed. I dont believe the sake of other articles (anti-X) existing should impact this article (See  for further rationale behind this), with this article alone, i do see some oppertunity to improve the article if someone were to take the time, so i would side on a weak keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: it's a poor sourced |original research by synthesis. There may be an article to be written on the subject, but the encyclopedic proof is missing from this article. There is nothing to improve, should be rewritten
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: there may be an article to be written on the subject of anti-Hungarian sentiment but this ain't it. Four of the five sources are thoroughly |unreliable (the fifth is not in English so I can't make a determination). The article engages in |original research by synthesis by taking incidents which may or may not be related to one another (a politician making an anti-Hungarian remark, graffiti on a Hungarian monument, etc.) and asserting that they are evidence of established anti-Hungarian sentiment. While I did not review all of the counter-examples offered above, those I checked now and those I've read previously all contain a multitude of references in unquestionably reliable sources. The |existence of one or a series of articles on various prejudices against various races and ethnicities does not in any way justify articles on this or any other such prejudice since each article stands or falls on its own merits and available sourcing. Suggest that any interested party write and properly source an article on the subject in user space and have it reviewed by a third party before it is moved to article space
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:WAX)