Deletion of Kapya John Kaoma

Comment: I'm surprised that anyone would want to delete this guy's article. He is a major commentator on African issues and have appeared on numerous UK TV programmes over the years on issues relating to Africa including BBC, ITV and Channel 4. I have examined the sources cited and virtually all of them comes from |reliable sources including the Guardian video https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/25/us-evangelical-missionaries-gays-uganda-video who sourced it from Docubeat - a non-fiction and news oriented organisation affiliated with the Guardian, Huntington Post and El Pais - all of which are reliable sources. These media houses have strong editorial practices. They would not add anything on their websites without following due editorial process. Even the bios and writings of this person from other reliable sources such as the Political Research Associates http://www.politicalresearch.org/author/kkaoma/, the Center for Global Christianity and Mission at Boston University (School of Theology) http://www.bu.edu/cgcm/research-associates/visitingresearchers/kapya-john-kaoma/ and Huntington Post https://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/rev-kapya-kaoma?guccounter=1 all passes RS. The Washington Post article https://www.washingtonpost.com/goingoutguide/movies/god-loves-uganda-movie-review/2013/10/23/a24f00d2-380a-11e3-80c6-7e6dd8d22d8f_story.html?utm_term=.28fde8b1735c about about his life and work also passes RS. As regards to some of his writings, it is irrelevant who authored them provided they are in reliable and veritable sources as per our policies here, and all of them passes RS. We cannot start changing the rules willi nilli just because we don't want a particular type of article here. This person passes  or at the very least, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: agree there is now sufficient evidence with the three extra sources above for  to be passed, regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: unless citations are added to the article to establish that he's |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I think that #1 is met; {{tq|The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.}}  He seems to be a leading expert on LGBT issues in Zambia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Appears to be a reasonably strong case for passing  guidelines, in that Kaoma is a prominent figure in his area of research and activism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)