Deletion of Mixed up everything

Comment: The Daily Mail article (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5698229/Meet-Australias-hard-rocking-Hanson-brothers.html) is pretty substantial and we might need to have a discussion on whether that rag qualifies as a reliable source. They have also been written up by the certainly reliable Classic Rock Magazine (https://www.loudersound.com/features/meet-mixedupeverything-four-young-aussie-brothers-taking-the-web-by-storm) and the major newspaper in their hometown (https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/dhima-brothers-banging-out-80s90s-rock-since-they-were-babies/news-story/dff4393d2876d8c15b6d7b355d1750c7). Those sources can also back up some factual statements in the article that current do not have a reliable source, such as being recognized by Offspring. I have no dispute with anyone voting to delete, and it might be  for an article about their few actual musical achievements, but they have gotten noticed for their unconventional busking success
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails . I can't see that as reliable, independent coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND)

Comment: fails .  References are either not |independent and reliable, or are trivial. Likely 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND||WP:IRS||WP:TOOSOON)