Deletion of Breast Tax

Comment: primarily because the sources&nbsp;seem&nbsp;to&nbsp;be focused on Channar revolt and Nangeli and don't explore this particular topic independently and in detail. As it says on , "'''If a topic does not meet these criteria but still has some verifiable facts, it might be ''useful'' to discuss it within another article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: fails  and per my comment above about source falsification on the article. I don't see any mention of this allegedly historical practice in academic literature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Breast Tax or Mulakkaram  is about a tax legislation in the Travancore|Kingdom of Travancore passes  clearly sourced in  .Further there are sources in the Malayalam language and  scholarly sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: I note that the first three references are very modern publications, making it clear that he topic has recently been in the media.  Whether historically it happened on not, the fact that it is believed in the mainstream media and discussed is quite enough to warrant an article.  This is a wider topic than Nangeli or the Channar revolt, so that having an article is justified.  There appear to be a number of .  The basis of the nom appears to be IDONOTLIKEIT, which is no basis for AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per  BhaskaraPattelar and . The apparent lack of historicity of this whole subject cannot be ignored
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)