Deletion of Rod of Seven Parts (4th nomination)

Comment: Good arguments in the previous AfD it is vexatious to renominate over and over.  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: Outside of primary sources, references to the Rod are fairly passing, mostly being relegated to "Top Ten" style lists that don't do much more than describe plot details about what it is.  The source mentioned above, found in the prior AFD, is, as the nom said, not really about the fictional object itself.  And, regardless, it seems to be the only real source that could really be considered a reliable, secondary source giving more than passing coverage on it which, alone, is not enough to satisfy the .  It could potentially be used as a '''Redirect''' target to such things like The Rod of Seven Parts (one of the adventures that it was the centerpiece of), but that seems to be about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: doesn't come close to passing , zero real world notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)