Deletion of Ioquake3

Comment: What this article needs to survive are |some reliable sources that back up the article.  I doesn't have any, and it was hard to find any when searching.  No matter how useful to a gamer, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.  If sources can't be backed up with hard evidence, it needs to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: http://ioquake3.org/ off-site canvassing (If TimeDoctor is reading, see Wikipedia:Canvassing) For those of you coming in to the discussion from the ioquake3 community please take note of the message at the top of this page. Insults and  arguments from the ioquake3 community aren't really going to endear themselves to the closing administrator
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: just in response to the above: Having a reputation, being valuable, or being used to power other games: these are not indications of |notability. Nor is my opinion of Linux at all relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and redirect to id Tech 3. There is a large volume of sources plastered across the article, but that isn't what the |notability guideline is about. What's being asked for is ''significant coverage'' in |reliable sources, IE do the bricks exist to build a proper wall. In this case I'd say no, by a mile, outside of press releases, copy-and-paste jobs etc. it's just passing mentions which are by definition no good for building a standalone article. If Ioquake3 is part of Tech 3's story then that's where it should be, it's still present on WP but as part of a larger subject rather than a standalone which isn't working out
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)