Deletion of Davis Graham & Stubbs

Comment: that I have added some sources to the article.  This AFD appears to have been brought and is now being defended in an instance of y. To me, an editor who works frequently at AFD, this AFD appears to be becoming a ,  demonstrating that major regional law firms almost always pass  if editors make good-faith efforts to source them.  I suggest that Nom might want to demonstrate good faith by flagging editors who disagree with his position, in addition to known allies on the point he wants to make
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:BOOMERANG||WP:GNG)