Deletion of Genesis 1:4

Comment: The page contains very little commentary, and even that reads like obvious . It would be possible to create an article, but this is not it. I cannot even see any point keeping the page history behind a redirect. I voted to keep Genesis 1:2 after it was expanded, but unless Genesis 1:4 is improved shortly then it should go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: to Let there be light, the article which talks about the ''content'' of this verse (and Genesis 1:3, the specific source of that phrase, which should also redirect there).  In general, I don't think that independent articles on each Bible verse are warranted.  Yes, there are certainly sources which focus attention on each in turn, but that does not necessitate that each receives an article any more than detailed analyses of Shakespeare suggest that we should have articles for each individual act of his plays.  In this case, however, the content of the verse is well known (much more so that chapter-and-verse number, unlike, say, John 3:16), and so  suggests that's where we should host the content.  Not coincidentally, the article there is, while still in dire need of improvement, better than what this AFD is looking at now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)