Deletion of Andrew Taee

Comment: Hi {{Ping|Gobbledegoop21}} you seem to be a bit confused by my remark (and BTW I am not the nominator). I said the '''creator''' of the article has a COI as he has declared working for Dial partners which was founded by Taee, this is not wrong at all just difficult to manage and discouraged. I think you do not understand the Wikipedia definition of COI and it would help you to read . Your user account was created very recently and for the moment is a |'''single purpose account''' and once again this is not wrong so there is no accusation being made but this is the only article on which you have worked. I am not accusing you of being a  or a  but I would suggest you click on the 2 links to understand what they are. The opinion of an editor that votes to keep an article just after his account was created and makes no edits outside of this deletion discussion is less likely to be taken into consideration with the same weight as another editor that is not limited to the subject in question but you are 100% right you are entitled to make your opinion on this page ...or any other for that matter but please don't be surprised or offended if it is not followed, this is not a vote but a discussion so 1 '''delete''' comment which is well presented will always be taken more seriously than any number of '''keep''' comments from SPA editors unless their arguments are valid
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SPA||WP:SOCKPUPPET||WP:MEATPUPPET)

Comment: as per nom, the COI creator of this article has removed negative sourced information and added non-encyclopedic vanity information. Oddly enough a new user who has never edited before has arrived to !vote keep. I strongly suggest |'''salting''' this subject as the creators and the various SPA editors refuse to respect or do not understand the AfC process
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)