Deletion of Femisplaining

Comment: This is a "stop making fetch happen" situation. Poor to intolerable sourcing, a word that makes no sense whatsoever coined by a YouTuber, and hardly meets  at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , , , , and . Articles are not for things made up one day in an angry spat of satire and/or Alfred Adler|Adlerian spite. We don't have articles for neologisms, ''per se'', because they are almost always |original research, as in this case, which we don't publish. I can't see any reliable sources either on the page or online; as {{U|NorthBySouthBaranof}}, {{U|TheValeyard}},  and {{U|Mrschimpf}} have noted above. Just because ''mansplaining'' is notable does not infer than ''womansplaining'' is as well. We also don't publish mere news in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP||WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:OR)