Deletion of Criticism of Muhammad

Comment: I think the argument for deleting "Criticism of" and "Veneration and praise  of" forks based on  is misplaced. The subject of these articles is the criticism, veneration and praise, not the person or organization being criticized. In this case policy dictates that the discussion of the criticism should be balanced per  (including criticism of the criticism), based on non-primary sources and not degenerate into a quote farm, which is what tends to happen in practice. The deletion of "Veneration and praise" counterpart (with which I disagree) was based not so much on NPOV grounds, as on  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:QUOTEFARM)