Deletion of Joe Kehoskie

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: This isn't the most interesting article on Wikipedia, but the current sources plus the new sources listed above are enough to meet . Here's another new reference (http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=69e23417-a1de-4d56-a7e2-5e7f6e7833c3 Edmonton Journal) that mentions the subject almost 20 times. || Note: Voting from IP (AT&T Business); don't want any retaliatory edit wars with the nominator, who seems like a man on a mission. || Special:Contributions/64.134.103.30|64.134.103.30
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This discussion should be closed pending potential investigation on account of it smelling like dirty '''|socks'''. It's really a profound stench
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)