Deletion of Lamara Qoqiauri

Comment: Even assuming we could source all the information, and look for citations,  I think if the information could be verified,  she would qualify as . Possibly not as a researcher: we have generally interpreted  this to mean notable on an international scale, for science is international. But social sciences, especially the applied social science are often country or region specific. but we have no way to look for citations.  She would possibly qualify under  provision 4 "The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. Criterion 4 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education."  Her bibliography shows she has written what would seem to be major textbooks, and I would think they might be widely used within the country.   But this is speculative. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: is being terribly written, ready for  and presumably created by the subject grounds for deletion? if so, I'm in
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:BLOWITUP)