Deletion of Pamela Taylor

Comment: She does not merit an article solely for being an electoral candidate, and she's not strongly notable otherwise. There are few to no  to demonstrate notability; with the exception of a still-quite-brief profile in the Ryerson University student newspaper, the sources here are not about her, but passing mentions of her in coverage of the 2007 election — and if the Ryerson piece is the ''only'' one that's about her specifically, then the expectation of ''substantial'' coverage still hasn't been met. And as for the notion that she's a ''current'' candidate, ''all'' coverage in reliable sources of the upcoming Toronto Centre (provincial electoral district)|Toronto Centre by-election states that http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100105/crowe_ndp_100105/20100105/?hub=TorontoNewHome "the Ontario Progressive Conservatives have not yet had a candidate step forward." So while I suppose it's still possible that Taylor might step up in time for the nomination meeting, as of right now she ''isn't'' a current electoral candidate. As if that mattered anyway, given that candidates don't qualify for articles just on the basis of their candidacy. And as it turns out, the source which was being cited to support the statement that she is the party's candidate in the by-election, in fact, ''only'' supported the ''existence'' of the by-election, and didn't mention Ms. Taylor ''at all''. And by the way, I ''live'' in Toronto Centre
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per : being a candidate is not enough for notability; does not meet  (significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:N)