Deletion of Pacific Title and Art

Comment: Nominator appears to have a misunderstanding of #REASON,  and .  Even the most minimal of  finds in http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Pacific+Title+and+Art%22 news http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Pacific+Title+and+Art%22 books and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Pacific+Title+and+Art%22 schoar the coverage the nominator claims does not exist.   is met.   is met.   is met.  Anyone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:HEY)

Comment: Reference added. More are available. Bad nomination (see creator's talk page): call for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)