Deletion of Naum Koen

Comment: as not notable and promotional. One of the first things I look at with a supposed biography, particularly a , is if the article is about the person. In many cases the article is presented as a |pseudo biography with more on the company. If the company is notable that should be the article. Sometimes it seems it is all about money. When money is involved we naturally get PR reps and PR companies that get paid to do their job. If a person is a billionaire there will be a list (a lot of the times by Forbes) and that seems to be an indication some think we "must" have an article. We have categories for the lists of billionaires in various countries. Lists that don't have blue links will be red linked for a future article. See: List of Southeast Asian people by net worth, List of Germans by net worth, and others. Many times the lists themselves are not notable being sourced by just Forbes like List of Indonesians by net worth. Some are worse (Theo Müller) than others but when the sources are promotional that is what we end up with. A problem with ''Interviews'' is that they are RARELY actually neutral and are most of the times biased and leans towards promotion. This leads to less consideration of reliability in general and almost always in particular is proven as fact that they are less reliable. There seems to be a continued misunderstanding about sources. A source can be excellent for article content but not advance notability. Our guidelines separate the two but many times we seem to fail to grasp this. A company source with just the name of an individual, owner, or CEO, is not about that person and may have just passing mention on the individual. Being ultra rich is not a good single criterion for having an article from an encyclopedic point of view but from a monetary, self-worth, or pinnacle of stature point of view, it makes sense. If I had 3 BILLION dollars (estimated 2,153 billionaires in the world) I would probably want a Wikipedia article also. I would likely have a PR team that would work to make this happen even if I didn't toss 50 grand or more at one in attempts to make sure it happens. The point is that the person may not actually be as notable as the multi-billion dollar companies they run so why not start with the company? In this case look at what sources are available. Without considering the reliability or specific criteria on advancing notability, the sources are mainly about the company or companies over the individual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PSEUDO)

Comment: per {{u|Otr500}} and others. While the sourcing has improved since the original nomination, the fact remains that most of the coverage doesn't meet RS. (In that it is mainly reprints of interviews/press-releases/etc, and hence represent Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Questionable_and_self-published_sources|questionable/promotional sources. And also seems to be about the subject's company, rather than about the subject directly.) While an argument could be made that contributors to this EN project |might be better swayed by RS coverage in English, it would seem reasonable that, if the subject is well-known to UK and RU speakers, then perhaps we'd (organically) have expected to see an article about the subject on the UK and RU WP projects first. Which brings me to my final point. Namely that the PAID/PROMO overtones here are concerning. And while the more glaring promo issues are largely addressed, the promotional undertones remain. (And, frankly, if they are removed, I'm not sure what is left.) In short, delete as NN (with a side order or NOTPROMO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: I accepted this draft submission because i found that it does rise to the level of notability and . The second source you mentioned https://www.segodnya.ua/economics/business/dubay-otkryvaet-vam-svoe-serdce-1211030.html is from an online publication that is a valid source for Ukrainian news. Here is an https://novosti.az/society/57367.html article covering his visit to Azerbaijan in the local news media. Here is an http://www.alkawnnews.com/article/175359/%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B9%D8%A9-NY-Koen-%D8%AF%D8%A8%D9%8A-%D8%AA%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%AB%D9%85%D8%B1-500-%D9%85%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D9%85%D8 article in Arabic news. There is many more i found in my Google news search. The many articles that talk about the his company almost in every case mention him personally because the company is how he conducts his business
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)