Deletion of A Scandal in Belgravia (book)

Comment: won the Nero Award 1992 ( #2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Creator). Article clearly meets . A curious, almost vexatious nomination. Clearly meets . Furthermore 'trivial' is clarified at  as '"Non-trivial" excludes personal websites, blogs, bulletin boards, Usenet posts, wikis and other media that are not themselves reliable' Publishers Weekly is not trivial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:BKCRIT||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Meets . I've expanded the article a bit. Given this was published in 1991/2, pre-Internet era, much of the sources are going to be offline. The nom found only trivial reviews because, unfortunately, those that happen to be readily available via Google also happen to be less substantial ones. An advanced search (author plus title) on a US regional newspapers archive http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_action=keyword&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_queryname=4000&s_home=home&s_sources=location&p_clear_search=&s_search_type=keyword&s_place=&d_refprod=NewsLibrary returns several results that Google doesn't; it's paywalled so I can't view fulltexts, but the opening paragraphs indicate reviews of some substance. When an emitus professor of English cites it as the best of the decade a quarter of a century after publication and it's won the Nero Award - all covered in the article, it's hard not to see it as notable.&nbsp;–Special:Contributions/146.199.151.33|146.199.151.33
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and multiple reviews
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)