Deletion of Kracko (2nd nomination)

Comment: to List of Kirby characters#Kracko, lacks multiple |reliable and non-trivial sources needed to establish notability, but deletion isn't an option. Individual character articles need to be well sourced and show out-of-universe details such as how the character developed, what was the reaction to the character etc. Kracko's just a minor boss, until someone demonstrates that a separate article is justified because quality information exists it should be a component of the character list
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I've added more sources the the article. Summing up my reasons for keeping: This article should be treated as a section of its parent article, as described in . The introduction and the Anime section of the article ''could'' be merged into Characters in the Kirby video game series without making the list quite big, but the "Appearances in Kirby Games" section would be too much to merge. The "Appearances in Kirby Games" section is also quite easy to find sources for, as it's easy to find sources that describe the games, and mention Kracko's role. Whether or not this article is kept, it is not going to solve the problem of sources (though I believe there is no problem). Whatever has been merged into Characters in the Kirby video game series (which does not include the games with Kracko, and which is harder to source) won't be different in sources. Wikipedia absolutely cannot fail to mention Kracko's role in different Kirby games, which is what many readers want, and is easy to source. It makes complete sense to treat Kracko as a section of Characters in the Kirby video game series
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)