Deletion of Biskra Palms, California

Comment: No http://pbbooks.com/caindex.htm post office.  I updated the article with a number of citations.  Durham is wrong, the palms at Biskra are native and were not transplanted from Algeria.  I found a https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67245506/native-palms-near-indio-destroyed-by/ citation stating that no one lived there.  I found not much of note in GBooks other than one https://www.google.com/books/edition/Indio/ADCUXS-6nl0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Ten+Tall+Men%22+Biskra&pg=PA11&printsec=frontcover source, though I did not look very hard.   Biskra was a yet another non-notable failed planned community. As there is no legal recognition, there is only trivial coverage of the location that indicates that it was not a community, neither #1 nor #2 of  are met.  This locale is not a notable community and the article should be deleted.  If someone wants to try to redo the article as some sort of notable hiking spot, go for it, but it seems  to me as a hike and would probably be better off as part of a larger article about hiking areas in the region
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:MILL)