Deletion of Featherproof books

Comment: More than passes |general notability with multiple, nontrivial mentions in verifiable, reliable sources.   It doesn't even require extra research; the information is right there in the article. It shouldn't matter where it operates from or whether or not it is an incorporated company; mentions in RS are all that matter, and the subject has those.  I don't find the deletion arguments very persuading since they seem to disregard that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per improvements made by Bilby that appear to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Fails , , , , .  And while we're at it, don't forget to vote '''Delete''' on ''all'' of the associated AfDs, which should have been bundled to this one, Zach Dodson and Jonathan Messinger and Brian Costello and Todd Dills and Samia Saleem and Susannah Felts.  Somebody--probably associated with this Featherproof micro-press--has been going around spamming Wikipedia with articles about every non-notable person ever associated with Featherproof
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:ORG||WP:CORP)

Comment: With the work done by Bilby I feel that this article passes the basic criteria in .  I found another reference but only have access to an abstract in the EBSCO database through my library.  Title is ''"the indie initiative: our annual look at small press success"'' from Poets & Writers; Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p58-68, 11p
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)