Deletion of Old Souls

Comment: Satisfies  and .  To be clear: my response here is not about the topic of reincarnation, it's about a biographical report by an investigative journalist and editor of the Washington Post. Notability of the book is sufficient for an article. It has been cited in more than 30 other books http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Old+Souls:+The+Scientific+Evidence+For+Past+Lives%22.  The book has been mentioned in multiple articles about Ian Stevenson, who was an academic psychiastrist and was the subject of the book, examples include http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C02E4DD153EF93BA25751C0A9619C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all the New York Times and http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/content/39/23/21.full Psychaiatry Online.  The book is listed with non-trivial commentary in the New York University School of Medicine http://litmed.med.nyu.edu/Annotation?action=view&annid=11793 Literature, Arts, and Medicine Database.  In Australia,  ABC National Radio's ''http://www.abc.net.au/rn/latenightlive/stories/2001/335494.htm Late Night Live'' ran a program featuring an interview with the author about this book.  More examples are available if anyone wants to search, but I stopped at the above because they are sufficient to establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:N)

Comment: Appears to meet notability requirement. See also: . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BATTLE)