Deletion of Ekorrgos

Comment: There are several good reasons for deleting this article, including the  argument that English Wikipedia is not a dictionary of obscure and local Swedish slang (as I native speaker I had never heard this one before, BTW), even if it should turn out not to be a neologism and the article would be rid of its other issues. To me the case for deletion is so obvious that I would have PRODed it myself if I had stumbled upon it before this nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: IDONTKNOWTHIS is not a reason to delete, but as a native speaker of a language it's always a red flag when you see a term that you've genuinely never seen before, and which looks like a random compound - note that Swedish can form compound nouns rather more easily than English, and all Swedish-speakers create lots of temporary compounds on the fly, all the time. That being said, I have Googled the term and it does pop up in some blogs, on Facebook pages and forum posts, but it still fails . The article's reference - a personal blog - states unequivocally that "ekorrgos" is a word the blogger had heard a friend use and which she thought was cool.  applies here. The term is not used or discussed in any reliable sources at all - but I don't think G3 appplies, it's not a hoax, just a really obscure neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP)