Deletion of The Reformation (band) (2nd nomination)

Comment: No assertion of notability in the context of  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: all - Nothing has changed substantially since the last time; the same single-purpose account vainly chipping away at an article for his favorite local band, the same local newspaper blurb, the same "review" from a non-notable music blog.  Does not meet , nor does t meet .  Delete, salt, and leave it so for eternity this time.  As the band is non-notable and the albums are non-charting independent releases, delete those as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: While I wasn't sure at an initial glance, the discussion between Hobbes Goodyear, Stalwart111, and Wikitam331 above does an excellent job of explaining why the sourcing at present does not meet  or . While I'm neutral on whether the titles merit salting again, the delete question isn't even close
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: The sourcing in the article's is extremely weak. Unless someone presents new coverage, I don't believe there is enough there to meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Coverage to date, in my view, falls short of meeting  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND)