Deletion of Diamond Standard

Comment: Even after trimming promotional content, still promotional, does not pass |corporate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Not a single one of the references meets the criteria for establishing notability, all are churnalism. Furthermore, I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content (this is the key bit and why the references provided to date all fail). Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: The issue isn't that it hasn't gotten news coverage - it has - but whether the coverage is no more than routine, thus this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: while I disagree with the characterization of it as "spam", I don't really see multiple examples of , and there's also a recentism/notnews/oneevent/sustained concern. Bottom line: the announcement of a company launching does not necessarily make the company notable. We shouldn't base articles on press releases, even if the press release is reported on in multiple sources of questionable reliability (like cryptocurrency trade publications). Because it fails NCORP, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)