Deletion of Dead Man's Curve

Comment: I can understand the nominator's point of view, but to me the list is not indiscriminate because the relationship to road safety seems evident when you look at the widespread use of the term https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dead+Man%27s+Curve%22&tbm=nws#q=%22Dead+Man%27s+Curve%22&tbm=nws&start=10 by putting it into a news search engine. As for trivial, I disagree there, too – Special:WhatLinksHere/Dead_Man%27s_Curve|just click on "What links here" to see how many other articles refer the reader to this page. (Many other editors have taken the time to link to it.) Where the present article falls down is its lack of eliable sources. The term is also used in at least one foreign language – https://www.bing.com/search?q=%22La%20Curva%20de%20los%20Muertos%22&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=%22la%20curva%20de%20los%20muertos%22&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=76274AB00FC8417A884F77A535F1FEC6 Spanish. The article should be improved by removing riginal research and finding good sources, but it should be retained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:O)

Comment: Unless |an article is so terribly written and poorly sourced that it would be better to blow it up, we generally keep even mediocre articles such as this.  |Whole articles and entire books have been written on notable dead men's curves, which |may be found easily, such as the old IRT curve at Broadway and 14th Street as is goes around Union Square in New York City, so the concept is |notable. There's an old guideline that AfD is not for ordinary editing fixes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)