Deletion of Ali Wallace

Comment: as a  pass, obvious notability supported by the sources present in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This seems to be more a case of  and . The sources are your typical "our local person is participating" or the general coverage of the event from primary sources from the various years or pageant-related sources. There is nothing beyond that to denote widespread or regular coverage of the subject. I couldn't find any mention of her at all in the Billboard reference, so that doesn't do anything to establish notability of this subject. The article is well-written (again, see , but a notable subject? Doesn't appear to be so. Same for the article on her mother
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NEXIST||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: agree with JonRidinger on the issues of  coverage being used to satisfy GNG. There is not significant coverage of Ms. Wallace separately from the pageant to demonstrate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: no one has ever been able to show a policy that says winning a state pageant confers automatic notability. Since pageants are entertainment put on by companies like Carousal Productions and the participants model eveningwear and swimsuits and perform talents, they fall under  as models/entertainers which contains tests that this person completely fails
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL)