Deletion of University of St Andrews Students' Association

Comment: The numerous harangues by deletion advocates alone provide almost reason enough to keep, but a student organisation about 7000 members associated with a world famous university is sufficient to indicate encyclopedic notability barring good evidence to the contrary.  No evidence has been provided that this organisation is less notable than other similar student organisations, and I consider them in general to be encyclopedic topics.   and  are the only concerns I normally have with this class of article, but I didn't notice any serious problems with this page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: My own research shows that there are a significant number of |reliable sources from which to write an article on this topic. The topic meets  and the article can meet Wikipedia article standards policies. As for the nomination, the answer is . AfD is not the place to resolve such content disputes. Please try Wikipedia:Resolving disputes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: per consensus.  There is no burden of proof of notability.  It's |snowing in Scotland
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: mdash; There are plenty of precedents for this type of article under :Category:Students' unions. Edit conflicts should be resolved on the article's talk page or elsewhere. The length of this article is sufficient to justify keeping it separate from the UoStA article. I am unclear whether this nomination falls under . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Boy, there's a lot of  comments already.  I'm sorry folks, but simply saying "But these articles exist" doesn't mean all that much since many of them probably should be deleted as well.  It's possible some coverage of this association might be appropriate on the university page, but I'm not convinced there's anything to merit anything beyond a brief mention.  Certainly not the level of organizational detail present on this page now.  Skull and Bones is an example of a society with established notability, this is so far not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)