Deletion of Stray cow problem in India

Comment: The topic is notable, but this is one of those rare instances where  might be applicable. Seriously take a look at the referencing (despite the efforts of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Notable topic, but the article has been written as a |synthesis -- needs some editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: per Wikireader41 and SpacemanSpiff. There ''may'' be something notable for an article or two, but given the article's narrowly chosen topic and the  issues here, it would be best to |blow it up and start over. It's a conflation of two only loosely related issues, that of Stray animals in India and Cow in Hinduism (which is mostly what Cattle in religion is at the moment). In (some parts of) India there are all kinds of stray animals besides cows, including buffaloes, dogs, sheep, and monkeys. Whatever the unmentioned "problem" in the title is, it's certainly less serious with cows than dogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:TNT)

Comment: I do not dispute that this problem exists. That being said, I don't think that this is the article. The creator of the article seems to have curiously intense interest in the origins of the Hindu religious belief in the sacred status of cows (see the talk page and Reference Desk), and while that in itself is certainly no reason to delete an article, it comes coupled with the pov that the religious belief is a "stupid superstition" (which is presumably why the article creator included unrelated data on the consumption and marketing of cow urine in the article), and as such, the original article was a synthesized piece meant to ridicule Hinduism. Having gone through the article and eliminated much not sourced or germane to the actual topic, there's precious little in the article which does not contravene 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)