Deletion of Joshua Ferdinand

Comment: since this article has been marked for deletion I have searched google alone in this time and been able to present a total of 26 references, while most are secondary sources and some of not high quality I've been doing it alone for an hour, I've seen other bios of living people with far less sources. This doesn't indicate that the character lacks notability. He's just tough to find on the internet, articles in multiple languages, over 10 thousand twitter followers, he's not, not notable. (A little bias as I'm a fan but still). Please consider helping improve the quality of this article and adding the right info bars as it meets the criteria for =Pass
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: I have updated the article with more references, should pass  as it has more than 2 sources and an award. Aliciadewi, why edit the article then ask for it to be deleted? There's notability about I don't know what you mean
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Actor has appeared in small roles, most un-credited. Article also appears to be a borderline case of  where the article creator / editor seems to be desperate to get the article passed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:CITEKILL)

Comment: Considering that this actor has become active relatively recently, and that the IMDB is seemingly the best source on him, I do not see any reasonable way of proving his notability. Someone mentioned his father's notability, however, it cannot be inherited. If majority of his roles are uncredited, and none of them can be detailed in more than two sentences, I highly doubt his notability is strong enough. Even if multiple reliable references would appear overnight, he would still fail notability due to |depth of coverage's apparent lack. No reason to move this to the draft space, this would just get stale out there, and we would have a MfD discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DEPTH)

Comment: or '''move to draft space''' and put under . I don't see anything here there clearly establishes notability. Lets look at the sources listed in the comment above a s particularly useful. No 1 is to "Spotlight Actors". I don't have access, but a comment above says that anyone can have a listing for an annual fee. If true, this is not a useful so8urce at all. No 38 is  "Impressionist France", program notes for an museum exhibition. It lists several photos as being by Joshua Ferdinand, but says nothing whatever about him beyond that he took these photos, which are reproductions of impressionist art, not original works. Not a helpful source. No 39 is "Ferdinand Knapp (2014)" which is used to support a quote. Unfortunately that quote is not about Joshua Ferdinand but about Ferdinand Knapp who is the title character in a short film. I can't find any mention that Joshua Ferdinand was in any way connected with this film. No 40 is  "Boom 2012, Tag 3: Depression 'Scratchbook'". This seems to be a personal account (or perhaps a work of fiction) in which the narrator is distressed and separated from his or her friend (or perhaps lover) after what seems to have been a bad drug experience. During this the narrator hears a presentation by Joshua Ferdinand, and records internal responses to some of the phrases apparently quoted from the lecture. Even if this was to be considered a reliable source, and even if it were clear that this is the same Joshua Ferdinand (which it isn't to me) all that it establishes is that Joshua Ferdinand once gave a public lecture or presentation at a festival. Not exactly what Wikipedia notability is made of. If these are the best four sources out of 40, I dread to think what the others may be like. This just isn't good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)