Deletion of Terrelle Pryor

Comment:  is an exception to general  requirements, not a replacement of them.  There may well be professional athletes that would not meet general notability requirements, see Keith Cash and Kerry Cash but they get in despite no references or reliable sources other than them having played in the NFL.  Conversely, there are athletes who do not meet  but do get in under general notability standards.  See Brian Orakpo and Colt McCoy as examples of athletes who have not played at the professional level but have garnered enough notability at the college level to be included.  Pryor seems to be one of those who has reached general notability standards even in high school.  Sergio Kindle is such a player.  Sometimes these players don't make it to the pros, see Robert Strait sometimes they do, see Adrian L. Peterson
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: per Stepshep above.  Previous consensus has been that NCAA FBS football players meet , and being starting QB for a major school certainly qualifies there.  The independent sources on him are staggering. Also keep in mind that  is just about presumption of notability; an athlete can be notable without meeting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Passes , which is merely supplimented by . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Balloonman has nominated several college football players for deletion with the same rationale, so I will post my same rationale to all of his AfDs.)  is considered to be an additional criterion to notability, as indicated Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Additional_criteria|'''here''': (''Should a person fail to meet these additional criteria, they may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability.'') Whether this player may or may not meet  should not be the question. The basic criteria, as outlined by , is that these players must be the ''subject of published3 secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,4 and independent of the subject.5''. It also says that ''if the depth of the coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability''. Take a look at the sources referenced by the article - do they not meet these requirements? I think they do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:BIO)

Comment: Meets general |notability guidelines, which generally take precedence over specific conditions listed under  (which are meant to help establish notability if the general conditions aren't met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Come on now this definetely meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: WP:N trumps . I expect every competent administrator to know this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)