Deletion of Will Batchelor

Comment: Non-notable in a very  way. I found nothing as far as coverage (that is, excluding the subject as the author). Also, I don't see a way to keep most of the text in the article as it's either  or unsourced in a way that violates  (, SPS). If this becomes a notable individual, he'll deserve an article re-written from 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SPS||WP:BLP||WP:SELFPUB||WP:BLPSPS||WP:RS)

Comment: as there are not reliable, third-party sources about the subject for purposes of verifiability or notability. The |general notability guidelines are quite clear on the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: wikipedia would also be doomed if every local dj and columnist had a poorly written article like this one. I'm not seeing how this subject might meet , without 3rd party references, he's just not going to pass notability guidelines.  This article escaped speedy deletion guidelines because it had references, those references must pass scrutiny here and they just dont.  Unless some source can be found where this person is the subject of the article and covered in some depth, it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)