Deletion of Pro-Life Alberta Political Association

Comment: Non-notable political org does not pass ,  nor 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGCRITE)

Comment: and fully oppose that article being renamed for this body as the ASCP has much more known history than this body which grabbed its history to try to gain undeserved  it hasn't attained on its own
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to Alberta Social Credit Party; don't rename for now. I cannot find any non-routine, non-trivial coverage of this party; it thus fails . In any event, covering the party at the Social Credit Party's article seems to be a reasonable way to provide context and background, as well as serving as an |alternative to deletion. Regarding the article's title, there's no need to resolve that here. Since the correct answer is unclear, a |requested move discussion would be more reasonable. (In my view, we shouldn't rename articles at AfD unless it's actually necessary. In this case, merging doesn't require renaming, so the decision on whether to rename should be referred to other processes. #Rename AFD|AfD is not "articles for discussion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:PRESERVE||WP:RM||WP:PEREN)