Deletion of Mitchell Waldman (2nd nomination)

Comment: Although the article provides more than 70 references, they do not confirm notability. The quoted reviews of the novel are all from blogs and such, not from eliable Sources. A search for mainstream articles about the author or his novel finds nothing. A search for the publisher of the novel, Writers Club Press, oddly does not find a publishers website; instead, the primary Google hit for this search is the self-publishing company iUniverse, suggesting that his novel may be self-published. For all these reasons, he fails to meet the standards set at . Writing legal articles would promote notability only under the criteria of , which do not seem to apply to this person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:AUTHOR||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: A successful start to an AfD, loads of words but no !votes and an unsigned nomination! No sources show otability is indicated in eliable sources. LitReviewer2, if you could please show just 2 S|reliable sources that show how this author passes  or  (and I suggest you read those), then I can consider changing my !vote. I don't have time to look at all 58 refs, but my random sampling include copies of his stories, lots of "articles" that mention his contribution to anthologies, and 200-page pdfs that mention his name once. And post edit conflict, please carefully read 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:R||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:LEGAL)