Deletion of INS Nishank

Comment: is probably best, allowing for a full article if information becomes available. As a missile corvette it seems potentially notable, no matter how many ships a given navy has of that class. Certainly there are plenty of historical ships no larger that all have articles. |Avoid systematic bias
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: unless sourced and expanded, '''Keep''' if this is done by this AfD.  Virtually every ship in the United States Navy has its own article. Is there a valid reason to treat the Indian Navy differently? If people think the current approach to articles on navy ships is wrong, a wholesale policy review involving deletion of a large number of articles might rectify the issue, but individual inconsistent AfDs don't appear to be the right approach. That said, article supplies no |sources and says nothing of substance about this ship,  and some basis for an article needs to be complied with at a minimum
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)