Deletion of List of Hewlett-Packard products

Comment: Individual models are |not usually notable, the stubs are OT|unencyclopaedic and will probably stay stubs forever. Models are usually only minor variants in terms of configuration or function. Furthermore, they may be problematical as they are often have life cycles of less than 12 months, are given different names in different markets, thus giving rise to an OT#IINFO|unmaintainable proliferation. A valid article could be created around a product or product line
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: list, aggressively prune product articles. Not every company's products need a list, but HP is a major manufacturer with thousands of products, a fair number of which have articles. There's a basic utility argument here per . As for the product articles, we don't need them on every model; that's like having articles like ''Ford Taurus 2007½''. But we do have Ford Taurus, so why not HP LaserJet; and arguably even HP LaserJet II deserves its own as a standard-setting product that dominated corporate offices for roughly a decade . The DeskJet certainly deserves a family article, the ScanJet, though I'm less certain the others are individually notable products. The Pavilion is now a longstanding HP brand of PC. But yes, individual product editions down to four numbers is something we can never keep up with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)