Deletion of Hongdoushans

Comment: Wikipedia contains numerous :category:chemical compounds|chemical compounds and there seems to be no sensible reason to discriminate against these ones. See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: The idea that "individual compounds are usually considered notable" is not true and should not be considered sufficient reason for keeping the article.  Chemical compounds need to meet criteria outlined in the |general notability guidelines to be included in Wikipedia.  Notability requirements for chemical compounds are supported by WikiProject Chemistry and WikiProject Chemicals as stated in Wikipedia:MOSCHEM#Scope|chemistry manual of style
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as failing  for these specific chemicals (the topic of the article here, per Edgar181). Even the cited ref describes the EC50 values it reports (the "anti-cancer activity") as ”inactive" for two of the three compounds
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: into taxane, per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: There are, by my count, close to 1,000 scholarly articles on taxanes from this specific tree (under the standard name ''Taxus wallichiana'' or the nonstandard name ''Taxus yunnanensis''). If that doesn't satisfy , I don't know what does. And if anticancer activity doesn't count as useful then, again, I don't know what does. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.17|202.124.73.17
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)