Deletion of Mahra clan

Comment: After a ''quick'' glance I don't see enough material for a stand-alone article. But it does appear in sources, so readers are likely to search for it. I'm wondering if it isn't best to create (per ) something like List of Jat clans or List of Panjabi clans and redirect there all these thread-bare stubs. If the sources that mention them are all Raj-era (or derived) then maybe such an article could do with a little introduction on the reliability of these sources. What are your thoughts, {{u|Sitush}} and {{u|Krishna Chaitanya Velaga|KCVelaga
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC)

Comment: Failure of . I don't why it was de-PRODed and it would be better if it had been nominated for speedy deletion. Most of the articles from these clan categories, completely fail the minimum notability guidelines and have no claim of significance. Probably created out of self interest. It would be good all these articles were multi-AfDed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)