Deletion of Fatcat Ballroom & Dance Company

Comment: to clarify my listing in light of subsequent changes to the article: AfD per , . One brief article in a local newspaper and an interview of one of the founders on a local radio station do not seem to establish notability through "significant coverage" as required by . The remaining four sources for this article are of the type specifically deprecated by "Primary criteria" in : "(for examples) newspaper articles that simply report meeting times or extended shopping hours, or the publications of telephone numbers, addresses, and directions in business directories". There is a business by this name, but notability has not been established. Additionally, evidence suggests that the author
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:SPAM||WP:ORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: completely fails . Local minor news mentions only, no significant coverage outside of its own area
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Article conforms to |notability guidelines for companies and does not violate any WP policies or guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&q=%22Fatcat+Ballroom+%26+Dance+Company%22 lack of multiple |reliable sources. Most of the sources in the article don't even mention this topic. I did find http://www.azcentral.com/community/phoenix/articles/2009/01/09/20090109phx-fatcat0110.html this article (http://www.webcitation.org/5kv94ONKS archived link) from ''The Arizona Republic'', but one source is not enough to establish notability. If a second source can be found, I will change my vote to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)