Deletion of Online mortgage advisor

Comment: Quick review of the sources identified above - The Financial Reporter piece is a rehashed press release with a brief interview with the managing director - this isn't independent of the subject; the Scottish Sun gives it a one line passing mention - not significant coverage (plus it's the Sun, which is not really |RS); I'm not so sure about the Express article - it's longer than the FR one, but still looks pretty puffy as if it was based on a press release, with another short interview with the MD, so may not be properly independent. There's also the problem that it's the Express - probably ranks lower than the Sun in terms of reliability. In short, I don't believe that any of these rise to the level of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Besides not being an appropriate title for the company (it sounds like a general article about mortgage advisors on the internet), the company falls short of  and . The sources mentioned above aren't independent sigcov and I also found these other sources that are similarly passing mentions or not independent: https://www.theguardian.com/small-business-network/2015/apr/14/startup-of-the-year-2014-online-mortgage-advisor a profile from The Guardian, https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com/online-mortgage-advisor/ an advertisement-like first-person article, and https://truvest.co/thousands-of-potential-homeowners-wrongly-think-they-cant-get-a-mortgage/ a TruVest article. I also found a http://www.gorkana.com/2016/02/10-yetis-digital-wins-online-mortgage-advisor-brief/ Gorkana News article, but this company still falls short of the aforementioned notability guidelines even with this. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)