Deletion of Sexuality of Abraham Lincoln (2nd nomination)

Comment: Original research, on Wikipedia, does not mean "some author I don't agree with wrote it." The content of this article is derived from multiple independently published sources. There's no reasonable claim of original research here. As to POV, I'm not seeing the problem, but if there is a problem,  nevertheless says, "''The argument "non-neutral point of view" (violates WP:NPOV) is often used, but often such articles can be salvaged, so this is not a very strong reason for deletion either.''" So source more content from the writings of David Herbert Donald if there's a problem. There is no argument for deletion. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)