Deletion of List of fictional cats

Comment: well-maintained, annotated, sectioned and structured as recommended by Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists).  is a Manual of Style, how does this list fail this exactly? The fact that the nominator can identify entries that they disagree with (anthropomorphic, robotic, etc.) demonstrates that this list is one of the better ones and can easily be useful and encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: There's no reason to delete the article unless you are also deleting every other 'list of fictional X' list on Wikipedia. In addition, for a more substantial argument, take a look at , namely, 'Information'. A list of fictional cats is a valuable reference for anyone who is drawing on it for cross references ("Cats in literature and film"). Sure, the article could use some cleanup, but it is a valid list by Wikipedia's own guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: Seems to follow the guidelines at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: unmaintainable, so broad as to be useless. Serves no practical purpose: Zaku kai does have a point. #INDISCRIMINATE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)