Deletion of Simon Proctor

Comment: Not so much  that I was meaning as  ''significant coverage''.  I'm not sure the three sources actually address this composer in enough detail nor are any of them primarily ''about'' him.  Also, one of these sources is only tertiary and is not about this composer: of its self this is not a problem but in this case, given the fact that both the Times and the Globe articles only mention him as a composer who happens to have written for a particular instrument, I don't feel there are enough secondary sources about this composer to back it up. With more work, though (adding actual quotes from the articles would be a good start) notability could be perhaps estabilshed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG)

Comment: It would be helpful to the discussion if those asking for deletion could address each of the sources in the article and explain how it is invalid for the purposes of establishing notability per  criterion 3
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)