Deletion of Xen Nightz

Comment: None of the sources in the article satisfies the requirements of , as none of them are ''independent third-party coverage''. Interesting also that the only real notability assertion in the article (1 million downloads) is also the only element in it that is unsourced. Then again, such a figure can be artificially inflated by having a bot visit the site over and over. --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails to meet the requirement at , i.e. two or more album releases on a major label
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMG)

Comment: fails notability (via  and ) as well as the verifiability criteria. I'm all for allowing time to improve references but, articles should make a reasonable attempt to include at least one reliable 3rd party source while they are in the process of being created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:N)

Comment: article fails to establish notability as per . While we can all agree he |exists, there are no |reliable sources to show any sort of notability. As Blanchardb pointed out, his only claim to fame is unsourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:V||WP:RS)