Deletion of List of most-disliked YouTube videos

Comment: Sources in article are enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per above. Per . Has enough secondary source coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per , a stand-alone list meets notability requirements if the set (but not necessarily every indivdiual component) has recieved coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, something which has clearly been met here as evident by the lede sumamry. Additionally, this article was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most disliked YouTube videos|nominated for deletion two years ago to the day. The decision was to keep based on these grounds. Further, the list has become even more notable sicne 2017 due to the 2018 YouTube Rewind fiasco
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per , and 174,475 pageviews from 22 January to yesterday shows that this page is important
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)