Deletion of Back to the Future in popular culture

Comment: The article is in principle notable - I don't think anyone's arguing BTTF didn't have a massive pop culture impact - it's just that the article content sucks.  |So I've attempt to improve it.  As of this posting I have just '''trimmed the article''', deleting the most obvious |original research and |passing references.  What needs to be done now is for each remaining entity to be re-written to show why this popular culture reference is ''significant'', and what it says about the impact of the film.  I've done a (not perfect, but workable) example for the Burnout Paradise reference.  Sources wouldn't hurt, either, although per  they're not strictly necessary for this kind of thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT||WP:OR||WP:POPCULTURE||WP:V)

Comment: I agree that some of the contents would make a viable section in the Back to the Future (film series) article, but only those can be shown to be notable with  (there are some - sorry I don't have the spare time to go through them all and check
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: A well written section in prose explaining how the film has been received in popular culture would be appropriate in the Back to the Future article, but one wouldn't need this material to do that.  What is presented here is a laundry list of trivial name-drops mostly compiled through original research.  None of it is cited, and none of it is directly relevant to the topic of Back to the Future.  Even if the topic was notable, the article would have to be rewritten from the ground up to comply with our policies and guidelines (, , , etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:TRIVIA)