Deletion of Drunvalo Melchizedek

Comment: For several reasons: Most importantly, the topic has not received |significant coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources. Feel free to disregard the following reasons, as the first is sufficient. This article is complete . Also, my wife read it and says that this article is  and promotional. Also, we ought to have especially stringent notability standards for any person who says that "Melchizedek" is their surname
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:BOLLOCKS||WP:CLAPTRAP)

Comment: Stephen.israel, I am sorry to say that your claimed expertise means nothing in this debate, and neither does your characterization of the subject as a "rockstar". It also doesn't matter whether anyone likes or dislikes the subject. What matters here is coverage in |reliable sources. Facebook is a website consisting of user-submitted content and is therefore useless to establish notability on Wikipedia. If and only if notability is established through other means, then the subject's own Facebook page can be used in a limited way as a primary source. YouTube is similar, and amateur videos or videos associated with the subject are useless to establish notability. A simple Google search does not establish notability, as the vast majority of Google hits on pretty much any topic are not reliable sources. What we need is |significant coverage in multiple, '''independent''' |reliable sources. I emphasize "independent" because websites, books and videos produced by the subject or organizations affiliated with the subject do not establish notability on Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)