Deletion of TeaPot Party

Comment: First of all, ''nobody'' is saying the TeaPot Party is "not ''real''". What we're saying is that the TeaPot Party is "not ''notable'' per the standards for inclusion of Wikipedia". Secondly, I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding at work here. If you look over the page, '''nobody''' has said they want to delete the page (yet alone "destroy" it). What we're saying is that the page TeaPot Party should be a redirect to Willie Nelson#Activism, or perhaps Willie Nelson#TeaPot Party, and that the one paragraph of information TeaPot Party contains can be placed there - where, I might note, it will, quite likely, be seen by ''more'' people than it would be on its own seperate page. And yet we're accused of |bad faith, |censorship, and |having an agenda bent on "destroying" this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:CABAL)

Comment: as has been done twice before, without prejustice for recreation if it evolves beyond something Willie Nelson |made up one day
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)