Deletion of The Museum of Broken Memories

Comment: The Just Adventure review and Jay is Games review carry ''just'' enough usable content IMO for an article in terms of |notability, the presence of an interview also helps a little. Just Adventure is a long established specialist website, relevant to this subject. Jay is Games http://www.indiegames.com/blog/2008/01/john_bardinelli_interview_1.html does have a reviews editor, regardless they are again long established in this area and their viewpoint is relevant. To discount them as reliable sources just because they don't lay their editing policies out on a platter just in case we wikicritters need everything spelling out is taking  beyond the bounds of |common sense. It's an independent video game, not aircraft design or trigonometry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:COMMON)

Comment: First 2 are from JustAdventures, which I don't know if it is a  or not.  Third has no content.  Fourth is about the developer, not the game.  Fifth has not content, just lists system specs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I believe the accepted notability guideline for software is .  I summarize it's criteria as whether the software is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)