Deletion of List of Americans in the Venona papers

Comment: Per violations of , and ESPECIALLY . Allegations and rumors are not the source of the encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: First, there are no  violations here.'''  applies only to BIOGRAPHIES of living persons. This is is not a biography of a living person. Further, involvenet of many people from this list in espionage was supported by ''multiple reliable sources'' (see WP articles about them). So that could be included even in their biographies. '''Second''', there are no problems with , , and  that would justify deletion of the article. Some of the people on the list are supported by provided sources; others are supported by references provided in WP articles about them. If some specific information is not properly sourced, this should be discussed, marked as {{fact}} and perhaps deleted if no sources provided. There is no way to justify the deletion of the entire article. I disagree with Piotr that such people are difficult to categorize. This is affiliation with spy agencies, not "conservatives" and "liberals". See also List of alleged secret agents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:RS)