Deletion of Songs To Wear Pants To

Comment: According to . ''Web-specific content is notable if it meets any '''one''' of the following: criteria...The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.'' The article establishes that it has, in fact established notability. It has been the subject of publications on Television (Call For Help) http://callforhelptv.com/callforhelp/amberstips/0209A.shtml, CBC Radio 3 http://archive.cbcradio3.com/issues/2004_11_26/main.cfm?IssueId=163, Exclaim Magazine http://www.exclaim.ca/index.asp?layid=22&csid1=2933 (which has a circulation of 100,000 copies http://www.exclaim.ca/images/distro_2004.pdf) and according to the STWPT website, Harpers Magazine (which has a circulation of 225,425 copies http://www.harpers.org/advertising/OLMediaKit/December05ABC.pdf
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails  and Alexa Web Traffic rank of http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.songstowearpantsto.com%2F 927,934
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I can't see any evidence of ''any'' work done by the webmaster. Also, the article clearly establishes its notability in accordance with . In case the small number of considerably notable references aren't convincing, the website's press page contains a list of verifiable notable appearances, of which only a few are mentioned in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Not notable per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)