Deletion of Praveen Sharma

Comment: Per my comments above. I certainly understand the opposite conclusion on the same facts. But this is my estimation. At minimum, this nomination deserves a |soft one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:SOFTDEL)

Comment: I took a look at the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Praveen_Sharma&oldid=406534269 earliest version that pre-dates most of the spammy content in order to find central claims to notability. This subject is or has been the http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/biochemistry+%26+biophysics/journal/12291 editor-in-chief of the Indian Journal of Clinical Biology, but I don't know if it's a ''major'' publication. This publication, which has existed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1356/ since at least 1997, seems to be a well-established, non-fringe, peer-reviewed journal and may help the subject meet  #8. This subject's social impact can be measured in the 2002 state-level http://medicaleducation.rajasthan.gov.in/kota/BIOCHEMISTRY.asp Rajasthan Merit Award for creating a laboratory, a very modest but additive quality in PROFESSOR #7 (non-academic recognition). For citations, Google Scholar was particularly unhelpful because of false positives due to other similarly named researchers; I looked for key words appearing in his publications (http://medicaleducation.rajasthan.gov.in/kota/BIOCHEMISTRY.asp here) and found many papers cited, though usually less than 20 times (see PROFESSOR #1). Given the time span of this subject's career, plus the rather specialized nature, citations to that extent may be sufficient in the aggregate with #7 & #8. I'll watch here for others' thoughts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR)

Comment: fails .&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)