Deletion of Theo Ellington

Comment: Doesn't meet  or ; no presumption of notability for political candidates, especially for municipal elections
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and . Reads very promotionally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in municipal elections — he would have to ''win'' a supervisor's seat to pass , and absent that he has to have enough preexisting notability for other reasons to pass another inclusion criterion. But this article shows no evidence of that at all: about half the footnotes are |primary sources that cannot support notability at all, and the half that are media coverage are not enough in volume or range or depth to make his candidacy special. An unelected city council candidate passing GNG is ''not'' just a question of "some media coverage exists", because some media coverage ''always'' exists of city council elections: we consider factors like what context that coverage is being given ''for'', how much coverage there is, how widely dispersed it is from purely local, and/or how deeply it focuses on him. But this doesn't pass any of those four tests
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)