Deletion of Morgan Downey

Comment: although the article was in bad shape, with references not conforming to Wikipedia standards, but these problems have hopefully been fixed as per . Clearly he's a top notch financial player, head of an information service for investors, an acknowledged authority on the oil industry since he was http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB123746056243383101 quoted here http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB122771048817859519 and here http://online.barrons.com/news/articles/SB123456959907586185?tesla=y and here and http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jul2009/pi20090729_264394.htm here and http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/1025/Oil-prices-fall-below-100.-Still-good-for-US-economy here. There is http://www.bizjournals.com/prnewswire/press_releases/2014/02/05/NY59074 in-depth focus on him when appointed CEO here and http://www.waterstechnology.com/inside-market-data/news/2327196/moneynet-nabs-ex-bloomberg-commodities-head-downey-as-ceo another one here.  He http://www.businessweek.com/videos/2012-03-14/cooper-dirienzo-lee-raithatha-link-panel moderated an industry panel here. Plus his ''Oil 101'' book was well-received, a bestseller, http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703794104575547002907107076 positively reviewed here, he got a http://www.energytrendsinsider.com/2009/04/27/book-review-oil-101/ rave review here, another http://www.foreignaffairs.com/features/readinglists/what-to-read-on-oil positive review here. Clearly he meets the  for multiple, independent, nontrivial reviews, possibly passes  as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I do not think that if an article is created by an  but has been edited by many people and does not resemble the original article,https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morgan_Downey&diff=625047288&oldid=275767508 that this is a grounds for deletion. It does look like it was a  but we do not know that for sure, and I do not think that even that is a grounds for deletion according to -REASON. If you try to Google Morgan Downey, it is hard to look through the results, because of another person with the same name who has gone into a lot of publicity for himself. It seems that his article, Richard Morgan Downey which is linked from this article and which has no sources and which content was created entirely by two seeming SPAs {{User|MorDowney}} and {{User|MorgDowney}} would be a better candidate to nominate instead of this one, so I am not sure I see why this one, which does have some sources, was nominated and that one was not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:SPA||WP:DEL)

Comment: Passes  and . Not too excited about the format though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:CS)