Deletion of Frank J. Vondersaar

Comment: Obviously fails the conventional  notability criteria, never having actually been elected. There must be a lot of candidates who have run 9 times and not succeeded, so I suspect notability on grounds of unelectability probably isn't sufficient. Neither his military career nor his accusations seem to warrant notability either. Obviously he is well sourced, so it is the additional criteria that are the deciding factor, and they don't seem satisfied
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Running for Congress nine times and losing doesn't even hold a ''candle'' to the ''95'' unsuccessful election candidacies of John Turmel, the worldwide Guinness Book of Records holder for this particular flavour of political notoriety — and even for Turmel, the notability clincher isn't really the candidacies themselves, so much as the fact that Guinness singled him out for the distinction. This article, however, is far too dependent on |primary sources that cannot carry notability at all, such as raw tables of election results and archived versions of his own |self-published campaign website, and the amount of |reliable source coverage actually being shown is ''nowhere'' near enough to actually deem him special for having run less than 10 per cent as often as the world record holder did. Being a perennially-losing perennial candidate is not a notability criterion under NPOL, but nothing here is compellingly detailed or compellingly sourced for the purposes of making this one special
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS)

Comment: perennial candidate who doesn't pass . The sources seem to be either obituaries or official primary election results
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)