Deletion of Bristol Hotel, Gibraltar

Comment: Sources appear to exist to make it notableand have it pass .  Multiple sources.  Book sources.  Sources dating over an extended period of time.  Sources where the hotel is mentioned in the name in the media.  These all go towards establishing notability.  Article has sources.  Not seeing the advertising nature of the article.  Not seeing anything that would result in commercial gain for the hotel as a result of the article existing.  (Unless the argument is any business that has an article gets commercial gain by virtue of the articles existence.)  If there is wording that is advertisement, the correct answer is to improve the pose, not to delete the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It seems to me that this article satisfies , architecturally and as a colonial era hotel still in operation. If it is informative to a tourist or business traveler, so be it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: in fact ''''''). Accusations of spamming are both fallacious and |pointy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL||WP:POINT)