Deletion of Marques Brownlee (2nd nomination)

Comment: I was surprised it was closed the first time, because Wikipedia is not about voting. So if 20 people say Keep and they have a poor rationale, and 2 people say delete per wikipedia rules, we go with the 2. And this issue of consensus needs to be cleared up. The remarks about he has a big following have nothing at all to do with Wikipedia criteria. I have no problem with his entry I have a problem with the total reliance on YouTube ref, which have next to zero weight in establishing Notability. Subject fails  and this is not an opinion it is a fact. At best the article should be a stub and the excessive YouTube ref be removed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject fails , , and . Any arguments about YouTube channel views, Google hits, or  cannot answer this failure of notability. Also, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:WEBCRIT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOTAVOTE)