Deletion of Numerical Analysis (book)

Comment: I was only able to dig up one real review (it is also listed in MathSciNet but the description there only copies from the preface rather than being an independent review). The review I found was about a quite old edition that appears to be significantly different from the present one. I added it to the article, but I don't think there's a lot to draw on in the way of third-party reliable sources about the subject that would provide content for our article, and I don't think the existing sources are enough for . On the other hand there are maybe 150 or so papers in Google scholar that cite this book and maybe if someone combs through them carefully it would be possible to find a few of them that say something nontrivial about it rather than merely using it to source some standard algorithm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Probably not notable by the standards described at ; note that item 4 there specifically excludes textbooks.  Looking at :Category:Mathematics books, I see that most books there are more notable than the average textbook.  Is there any evidence that the same is true of this book?  David Eppstein's comment above suggests that it's not impossible, but I'd like to see something more specific
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)