Deletion of Justin Landry

Comment: passes  as has reliable source newspaper coverage such as Toronto Star and Town Crier, being on a television series for two years is not trivial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The ''Town Crier'' is a community weekly newspaper that is neither widely distributed beyond its own neighbourhood nor archived anywhere that we could ''retrieve'' the content again if the weblink ever died, so it does ''not'' count toward passage of . It would be acceptable for supplementary sourcing of stray facts ''after'' GNG had ''already'' been satisfied by stronger sources, but it cannot count toward the initial question of whether GNG has been met in the first place. And the same issue pertains to ''Durhamregion.com''. And I searched to find the ''Toronto Star'' article as well — it is not in fact ''about'' him, but merely namechecks his existence a single time in an article about something else, so it's not bringing any GNG either. And  is not met just because roles are asserted, either: it's met when the roles are ''supported'' by sourcing that ''satisfies GNG'' — but ''none'' of the sourcing here satisfies GNG, so NACTOR is not passed. SNGs do not provide an ''exemption'' from having to source an article over GNG; they serve to clarify the types of things are accepted as notability claims ''if'' they're ''supported'' by GNG-passing sources, but the sourceability still has to pass GNG to ''actually'' get the article included, ''regardless'' of what it unsourcedly or bad-sourcedly ''claims''. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when somebody can source it ''better'' than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)