Deletion of Patrick Yu

Comment: This person seems to meet the criteria listed under  and , but the article does seriously lack reliable sources and references.  Perhaps most of the unsourced information in the article should hidden until they can be cited and verified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&q=%22Patrick+Yu%22+%22hong+kong%22+-inpublisher%3Aicon&btnG=Search+Books Many sources available, and three of the first four describe him "legendary," "famous," and "renowned" in Hong Kong legal circles.  Thus appears to meet .  The article suffers because it was written under the far more lenient 2004 Wikipedia standards of referencing and hasn't improved since, but I daresay someone obsessive enough to care could turn this into a good or featured article--and that's before we get to the strong likelihood that there exist numerous contemporary newspaper articles about Yu that aren't readily accessible online.  Appears to meet the AUTHOR standard, as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)