Deletion of I-20/59

Comment: Not all highway concurrencies have the type of sourced notability that, say, U.S. Route 1/9 does, and this one doesn't seem to warrant a standalone article. Any potential content would ultimately be |forks of the individual articles. A disambiguation page sets a bad precedent, in that we don't need such pages for potentially every concurrency, and there is no single redirect target, in that I see no rationale to pick one route over the other, even if I-20 is considered a "major" Interstate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK)

Comment: as shown now, the "article" fails  as a topic distinct from the two overlapping Interstates, and this version of the "article" should definitely be deleted. Based on page views, it's an unlikely search topic to warrant the disambiguation page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)