Deletion of XVideos (2nd nomination)

Comment: The subject is web content, not a company or organization.  The relevant guideline is , especially WP:WEBCRIT.  DEPTH is part of , which applies to organizations and is meant to hold organizations to a higher standard than GNG.  The sourcing of this article is still not the best at first glance, but DEPTH is a misapplication of guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB||WP:CORP)

Comment: I'm trying to |assume good faith but it feels insane to me that the nominator is just ignoring the consensus that was established. Per : "After a deletion debate concludes and the consensus is in favor of keeping the page, users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating the same page for deletion again, to give editors the time to improve the page. Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome." This should have been brought up at the article's talk page for discussion instead of a crazy renomination like this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:ASSUME||WP:AFDHOWTO)