Deletion of Lumber Cartel (second nomination)

Comment: The coverage in the sources provided is really scraping the bottom of the barrel |V-wise, but it still appears marginally valid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: It's a buzzword and a meme which hasn't seen any use outside of USENET for six years; One article it uses to establish notability has source disclaimers; Another smells of a olden-age scamsite with its flamboyant exclamation, flashing lights, long sidebars, and buzzword usage ''(Does it meet ?)''; And the last is, at most, a passing and aged reference. Applying  to this, and just for the heck of it, ... It satisifies neither. And, finally, "Who cares about the Lumber Cartel?" Does anyone at all outside of USENET care about the phrase? It hasn't become commonplace in anti-spam efforts, it hasn't been mentioned at '''all''' in a published article ''(Neither the WIRED or SALON articles appear to have been included in the respective print issue.)''... It shouldn't be included in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:EL||WP:WEB||WP:ORG)

Comment: References in ''Wired'' and ''Salon'' establish notability. Google Groups provides verifiability. (In  jargon, I assert that Google Groups is a reliable publisher of a primary source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)