Deletion of List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair (4th nomination)

Comment: There's a lot of coverage of this topic, coverage treating them as a group, and a clear inclusion criteria -- hence it's meets  and . That's why we've come to that conclusion ''three times already''. Lots of impassioned  going on here. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:SAL||WP:DONTLIKEIT)

Comment: given the interest that has been in the topic (as in ) and the importance of the position, this article is justified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Bearcat. I continue to believe, as I stated in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Presidents of the United States with facial hair (2nd nomination)|2016 discussion, that the content be rewritten as "Facial Hair in Politics" (to be broad) or "Facial Hair in American Politics" (to be specific), since the article contains "reliable sourced content about the ''political implications of facial hair.''" I continue to believe that the list itself approaches 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: A typical Wikipedia list of the |haphazard variety, without any  |encyclopaedic purpose whatsoever. The lengthy citations about presidents with facial hair do not sum up to notability for the article's subject. Multiple articles about a blonde actress or about a bunch of blonde actresses do not amount to notability of the set "blonde actresses." Willing  to reconsider my suggestion if someone posts up a List of Presidents of the United States with Toupees. Or the list of  Naturally Blonde Actresses
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: I agree with Tryptofish and to an extent TJRC immediately above. I think this is a notable topic based on the number of reliable sources which discuss it, even if it does seem a bit silly. The list format it takes isn't really discussed by the sources, but it's clearly notable. I don't know what a good move candidate would be, keeping the list inline, but a) this should not be deleted since it passes  generally and b) it may be presented better in something other than a list format
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Odd subject matter, but appears to meet  and some !votes appear to be , which is a bad reason
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: If  were a valid reason to !vote "delete", my !vote would be delete... because I think the concept is silly. But there's no question that the issue of facial hair for U.S. presidents has been the subject of published material in multiple reliable sources and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG)

Comment: this topic has been discussed sufficiently in sources to meet  requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)