Deletion of Egg, Inc.

Comment: or '''speedy keep''' this). Disagree with nom's rationale, it's clearly not a promotional article. It was created by {{user|KAP03}}, who, as far as I can tell, does not have any ties with the developer. It could use some editing, but that's basic  stuff
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I don't understand the claim to ing, but if its in there somewhere, it'd be a minor thing to be fixed through cleanup, not a reason to delete. The subject appears to meet the . Of the sources already in the article, Pocketgamer and Gamezebo are currently considered |reliable sources, and found this dedicated article from RS https://www.theverge.com/2017/3/3/14800312/egg-inc-ios-android-farming-game The Verge as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: There are 5 different criteria under . Which one do you think applies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)