Deletion of Wil Cardon

Comment: unsuccessful candidate in a contest to be a candidate. Trivial mentions, fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Another republican utterly destroyed. Still, he passes  criteria. I will say again, if his campaign was a just a protest or whatever, it was clearly a notable one. I don't really know. But obviously this guy was the Republican choice to crash and burn. A little research will show that 15% is about the expected number when one "sacreficial lamb" is placed up against a giant of the opposite party. This holds true for both parties in entrenched areas. Obviously he's not a paper candidate, therefore he's a legit candidate. The article should stand. If the editor who proposed this deletion would care to propose deletions for some Democrats who fell similarly to Republicans in entrenched areas, I will be happy to support that they be kept as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)