Deletion of List of Latin phrases (2nd nomination)

Comment: encyclopedic list of phrases. With articles of a couple of Latin phrases, this list does have some encyclopedic value and its totally just not a dicdef like list. |Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia after all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: regretfully.  These are better placed at wikitionary or wikiquote.  I would support a merge of alea iacta est, Ecce homo, et cetera into a ''new'' "List of Latin phrases" article with reasonably tough standards of notability for inclusion, or a "Use of Latin in English" article explaining the history of using Lating quotes and phrases in English texts, but neither of those what we have before us.  What we have is a list of quotes and dict-defs which runs squarely afoul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:NOT|Wikipedia is NOT an encyclopaedia, it's a collection of #It should be about everything|any information that could be |useful, even if that means usurping data that is better suited for sister projects like Wiktionary. Plus, this has the entries arranged alphabetically, allowing for a far better navigation than that of :Category:Latin phrases. Oh, and |I like it. Plus, it's |interesting. Also, we have #What about article x?|other lists of stuff and this is better than some of them. If you delete this, #All or nothing|you'll have to delete every list in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AADD||WP:USEFUL||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:INTERESTING||WP:AADD||WP:AADD)

Comment: per V-Man and Dweller. Not a dicdef; highly encyclopedic, as many of these Latin phrases have a long history and are used regularly in conversation. This is emphatically not a   argument; there's nothing in  that applies directly to this page, nor should it come under . Some of the entries could be removed, but that isn't a reason for deletion per WP policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:LIST||WP:WINAD)

Comment: This is not arbitrary |listcruft, and the phrases have some historical significance, e.g. "Veni vidi vici". Jonnbo's point that Wikipedia is not a classic encyclopaedia is true. This isn't an  vote, more a reasoning as to why the article should be kept. It does have encyclopedic significance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: First I'm going to say 'because its useful and because I like it' lol. The fact that when this page came up for deletion it before it got squashed flat begs the question why is it up again. Its an important resource and deserves its place on wikipedia as much as it does on wiktionary. I can see this page being very useful for a great many users searching the encyclopedia. If i went to find a phrase for the State motto of South Carolina I would search for it on wikipedia. Also I don't think that the #DICT argument holds much weight in this case. It seems to me that its for prevent individual words with a definition being added as an 'article'? Thats not the case on this page its a translation for an entire phrase many of which have historic and cultural importance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)