Deletion of Comsec Consulting

Comment: per the sourcing found above. Meets . Jayron32 has located many. By a preponderance of evidence we can see notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The test is not merely for "reliable sources" or "independent sources". The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of |*significant* coverage with |*in-depth* information on the company and (this bit is important!) containing *Independent Content* which is defined as follows: "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The "independent" "reliable" sources produced above by {{u|Jayron32}} fail to meet the criteria for establishing notability as follows
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I can find things out there in reliable sources showing they are notable, certainly enough to pass  and .  https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-1000720621, https://www.emerce.nl/wire/comsec-benoemt-itay-evron-tot-nieuwe-managing-director-benelux, https://securityintelligence.com/cybersecurity-at-the-world-cup-what-you-should-know/, https://www.scmagazineuk.com/interview-nissim-bar-el/article/1467291, https://www.haaretz.com/1.5280983, http://www.cybernation.co.il/news/comsec-sold-for-21-7-million/, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:42)

Comment: Appears to have received no significant coverage other than self-published sources (press releases and website) and only incidental references outside of that. I agree that  controls
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)