Deletion of Near-birth experience

Comment: as said  and  requires to represent a variety of views, specifically if there are reliable sources as is clearly the case confirming |notability. Possibly needs to merge to avoid |forking if will not grow in time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NEUTRAL||WP:NOTE||WP:CFORK)

Comment: as said  is not a criterion for deletion. It may well be bollocks, but it is certainly highly published bollocks, and as such, still notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Another  nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Out of Body experiences are notable.  Birth is notable.  Birth involves extreme physical stress.  Extreme physical stress is a recognized catalyst for OBE reports.  The web has no shortage of childbirth-specific OBE reports.  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: A  fusion of material from books by three authors, not one of whom rises to the level of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Actually, the references ''do'' have to have some level of notability (as defined by ). If a subject attracts no interest outside four books in its immediate context, there is absolutely no reason to have a separate article about that concept. If I start an article about myself, I have to prove that there are sources outside my own blog and fan-site who indicate what my significance is before you ask: I don't have either a blog or a fan site
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)