Deletion of Pegasus Airlines Flight 8622

Comment: Yes, over-runs are common. Over-runs down the side of a cliff? No. This easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS, . Non-notable run of the mill runway excursion, with no infrastructure damage, very limited injuries and probably no hull loss (but that is irrelevant as insurance write-offs do not a hull loss make)! There is NO reason why this minor incident should have a stand-alone accident, but entries in related lists Accidents and incident sections would be welcome!! Why do we keep getting these frivolous attempts to get non-notable accidents stand-alone articles. There is a MOUNTAIN of consensus which can be used to justify deletion or retention!! USE IT BEFORE you write articles and we can all have an easier life
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The notability consist of the weirdness of the occurrence, even more notable as pilots said the plane https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/stricken-turkey-plane-suffered-sudden-engine-surge-pilot-1800216 "suffered sudden engine surge". 2017 being safest year ever for commercial aviation, lots of people have interest in accompanying incidents, and certainly this one will be investigated so Wikipedia is a natural fit for compiling this information. And also to me  and  doesn't fit here, because this topic has significant coverage in reliable sources and is not acting as a newspapers. See as an example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_66 Air France Flight 66. Special:Contributions/138.118.196.54|138.118.196.54
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)