Deletion of List of months by year

Comment: per . The linked articles are clearly related and therefore there should be either or both of a category and list for them. This is the list. The deletion rationale (that it now includes redlinks) in no way supports deletion - indeed,  (sub-section of the first link) explicitly states that the ability to contain redlinks is an advantage of a list over a category
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLNT||WP:DOAC)

Comment: per . The ultimate exemplar of  per Over-Extensive Lists. This might be the best (worst?) example of  on this encyclopedia. Just think of how much ground that covers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OL||WP:LISTCRUFT)