Deletion of Leeds University Conservative Future

Comment: per nom or merge per Trials.  Wikipedia is ''not'' an "encyclopedia of all things" and should not be, as obscure, unwatched articles have lead to legal troubles in the past.   is a guideline, but it's a concensus guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This does not fail  because  is a *proposed* policy and as such is not binding. Since this organisation exists there is very little point in deleting a factual page about it. Wikipedia has the capacity to outgrow the limits of paper and bound volumes; why *shouldn't* it catalog the world? Nobody is forced to read the article or forced to acknowledge its presence but its there for anyone who wants to read it, and that really is the service we should be offering. I've yet to see a good argument as to why deleting it has any advantages over having it there for those who will read it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: Fails . Individual chapters of national organizations need to show special notability to justify own article separate from national organization
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)