Deletion of TH Heavy Engineering Berhad

Comment: As already stated, none of the sources contain significant coverage, and the article does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No non-trivial coverage. The WSJ and Reuters "sources" are just stock price trackers, and all the other sources are either not reliable, not independent, or consistent of only trivial coverage. The fact that the company has had important clients does not make it notable by itself. When the best argument for keeping is that |other stuff exists, then the article should not be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)