Deletion of Arul Chinnaiyan

Comment: The article is in very bad shape and needs considerable work. However, the subject is clearly notable. GoogleScholar searchhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Arul+Chinnaiyan%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws gives top citation hits of 2030, 1600, 1054, 582, 340, 288, 279, 264, 255, 234, etc. These are huge numbers. H-index is 45 per QuadSearchhttp://quadsearch.csd.auth.gr/ssearch.php?m=1&lan=1&tos=2&v=1&frop=1&sd=0&wtl=1&regc=us&query=%22Arul+Chinnaiyan%22&query2=&search=Search&sst=1&subj_all=2&st1=1&st2=1&st3=1&st4=1&st5=1&st6=1&st7=1&ResPerPage=10&sp=1. Again, a huge number. Passes  by well over a mile. Definitely a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Although very poorly written, it does cite |reliable sources that indicate at least a measure of notability within his professional field.  Improve, don't delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)