Deletion of Rushika Fernandopulle

Comment: not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show they pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: You're missing the "significant coverage" part, which cannot solely consist of quotes ''from'' the subject, which must be ''about'' the subject, which can't be press releases or routine namedrops debarred by .  So let's examine the cites.https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2004/06/21/story8.html is about Renaissance Health, not about the subject.https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/startups/2013/03/iora-health-opens-boston-area-primary.html is not only the same, it's plainly a press release.https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2015/05/03/iora-health-pioneers-new-primary-care-model/kc7V4W5V8OJ0gxFqY4zBrK/story.html is similar.https://www.wired.com/2013/11/wired-data-life-iora-health/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/upshot/small-company-has-plan-to-provide-primary-care-for-the-masses.htmlhttp://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/Op-Ed/2016/12/11/There-s-a-better-way-to-deliver-primary-care/stories/201612110009 are about Iora Health, not the subject.http://health.usnews.com/doctors/rushika-fernandopulle-209857 is a one-paragraph capsule description in a section with *hundreds* of the same, if not thousands.Lacking is any ''significant coverage'' of the ''subject'', as the GNG requires
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)