Deletion of Josh Rimer

Comment: Article is completely unsourced, and claims nothing that would entitle him to an automatic inclusion freebie in the ''absence'' of enough sourcing to clear the . For the record, while his brother Spandy Andy Rimer's article technically had actual sources in it, they were also far too weak — consisting almost entirely of |primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage that wasn't substantively ''about'' him — to support how advertorialized its content was, and hence I've speedied it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: Agree with ''{{u|My name is not dave|C'est n'est pas un Dave}}'' that now we're here, we might as well see it through.  A  search (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Josh+Rimer%22&dcr=0&tbm=nws&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjN1YO2qp_WAhXGKcAKHZgoCUQQ_AUICygC&biw=1280&bih=647&dpr=1.5 ) indicates a lack of |in-depth or |persistent coverage in third-party |reliable sources sufficient for the subject of this filing to pass the minimum requirements of . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENT||WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO)