Deletion of Raymond Aaron

Comment: this will sound very unfair, I apologise in advance for that.  All the things you have stated are true, of that I am sure.  Some of them, if reported in |reliable sources could well add up to notability.  They may not.  But Wikipedia is not interested in Truth.  It is interested in verifiability.  A lie is as encyclopaedic as the truth if it is notable (look at conspiracy theories) and verifiable.  It is extremely difficult ''knowing'' that one has what look like quite magnificent achievements and having to understand that they are only acceptable here when verified independently in reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as non notable for the reasons set out above. Note to Mr. Aaron: in borderline cases which have ample helpings of  it is always safer to delete. If the subject is notable, a new article will eventually be created by soeone independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: As this stands it is a very general piece of information. If you search for my name on Google, for example, there are just under 4,000 articles with it in, quite a few of which of which refer to me.  When I run the search my own blog comes up as the top answer.  I am damned good at self promotion.  But that ''doesn't'' make me notable.  What is required for notability is not just a hit, but an item, however short, in a |reliable source.  Most importantly that needs to be placed in the article as a reference.  These were the things I failed to find.  If you have had better success please place the relevant reliable source references in the article and let us know that it has been done
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Overall, the sources provided suggest  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I don't think his work as author is influential enough to satisfy , nothing else in the bio qualifies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Beyond the conflict of interest and puffery issues, as well as the multiple edits from one-subject users, the coverage in many of the sources is incidental.  While I would ordinarily argue for a mere "Delete" based on , I think the context argues for a STRONG DELETE, whatever that exactly means
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)