Deletion of Umar Farooq Zahoor

Comment: subject has accrued coverage (both significant and tangential) in a number of reliable sources; this can easily be seen with a select google searches like https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&ei=4MWmXK33K8OzggfCiIMw&q=%22Umar+Farooq+Zahoor%22+&oq=%22Umar+Farooq+Zahoor%22+&gs_l=psy-ab.3..33i299k1l2.28653.29539.0.29890.2.2.0.0.0.0.97.174.2.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.1.96....0.WeMO0YzRjH0. Notably, the Norwegian newspaper/tabloid published several stories https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/Xynyb/ghanas-minister-of-power-signed-deal-with-a-man-from-oslo-wanted-for-fraud-and-organized-crime-the-deal-is-worth-510-million-dollars https://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/i/kl8xv/lokket-nordmenn-med-falsk-bank regarding the subject, and this coverage in turn generated coverage https://www.ghanabusinessnews.com/2015/12/17/vg-editor-responds-to-ameri-on-umar-farooq-zahoor/. Regardless, |AfD is not cleanup, and the sources available online (I am guessing a  check was not undertaken before this nomination) make a strong case for the subject meeting both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: per nomination. All allegations can not be supported by reliable sources and when those allegations are gone, the topic fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:RS)

Comment: Does not pass notability and seriously violates  and . A BLP can not be written in this tone. Created by the paid blocked editor Special:Contributions/Bernie44|Bernie44. Moreover all or most of the controversial information about the person are from a newspaper called ''Verdens Gang'' seems to have a personal clash with the guy. All of the sources violate 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:RS)