Deletion of Tania Pleitez

Comment: I don't think the fact that the citation counts are low is particularly meaningful; she's not a scientist, and I would expect them to be low in this subject, even for notable people. It would be a fallacy to say that many notable people have low citations and hers are low so she's notable; I think we have to look elsewhere instead. But, looking at reviews, she appears to have no books of her own. We have (as listed above by pburka) a single review of a volume edited by someone else that has one of its 12 chapters by the subject, and another published article specifically about the subject's poetry. I don't think the first of these counts for much at all. The second one seems a lot more significant to me, and comparable to a single published book review, but it's still only one source, and it's the only such source I found. I don't think it's enough for , , , or any of our notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . One of her essays is reviewed https://www.jstor.org/stable/23022129 here and, unless I'm mistaken, she's also a poet and the subject of this paper: https://doi.org/10.15359/istmica.22.4 "La poesía de Tania Pleitez Vela: memoria y rememoración
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I think might be a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: On a promising road, but for now I'd say, overall, she does not pass the average professor test of , nor (analogously) an average author/poet test. Somewhat low number of citations, even considering her low-cited field. Plus, I'd expect more than two or three secondary sources talking about the work of a poet/author to establish  or , even if they were blog posts, and I am not convinced she is notable in this sense yet (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:TOOSOON)