Deletion of List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks

Comment: this article has been in existence for more than 2 years, and still it does not cite verifiable evidence that the list existed in any form other than as an urban legend -- it's pure hoakum.  When Snopes examined this issue, it decided that the list was Urban Legend, yet the author consistently refuses to allow the introduction of material casting doubt on the list's authenticity -- it's pretty much a one-author guard-dog article.  The article violates , ,  and .  Should've been deleted long ago.  Image:Matt_Devonshire2.jpg|20px
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:OWN||WP:NOR)

Comment: vote change below). I disagree with the nom about the notability of this article--Clear Channel is a large entity whose decisions affected the playlists of a huge portion of the radio marketplace. Its actions are indicative of the social and cultural climate of that time period in the United States, and a well-maintained list serves to illustrate the extent of that climate/attitude in the music industry. There are also references provided at the end that I expect back up most of the entries. That said, a review of the Talk page and edit history seems to back up allegations of attempted |OWNing of the article, and it might have been wise to call for mediation some months ago. But at this point, the edit wars appear to have died down (no conversations on the Talk page for a month before today, and the bulk of recent edits have been more like copy-editing), so even that may not be an issue at this point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: What a load of wasted blather about such meaningless listcruft.  |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate repository of information.  There is absolutely no point to this article, as a composite of trivia.  That, combined with the possibility that the whole thing may or may not just be |complete bollocks (and I tend to think it is) means that it is unencyclopaedic.  Just get rid of it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BOLLOCKS)