Deletion of Mural of Marcus Rashford

Comment: You know, I completely disagree with every delete vote, nothing is policy driven in the delete camp, nor have they truly considered the aspect of , the article has multiple sources. Lets looks at List of works by Banksy, there are multiple articles on that list that have be created and are in a far worse state than this article which this AfD is about. I completely disagree that this is a . The argument that the subject is not news, when clearly it is news because of the vandalism and aftermath, even the https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/13/world/europe/marcus-rashford-soccer-racism-mural.html new york times picked up on the story, which points to the fact this isn't just local news. It's national news and has gone international. Nearly every news agency in the UK has picked up on it. Run a google search and tell me this article does not pass GNG... Seriously, if this gets deleted I might challenge that also
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CFORK)

Comment: passes . All my warmest wishes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: easily passes  and not for one time event, a bit long to merge into Marcus Rashford
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Significant change has happened to this article since nomination. Widespread continued coverage takes this well past  and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: to Marcus Rashford -  applies
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)