Deletion of Sean Curran (scientist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: mdash;Eyeballing google scholar, h-index is ~11.  The NYTimes and Wired coverage doesn't go far enough (in my opinion) to demonstrate the "significant impact" required by , and they're not sufficient for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: despite the apparent self-promotion and sockpuppet invasion here and the  and  promotional language on the article, some of which I just https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Curran_%28scientist%29&diff=623917737&oldid=623630048 cleaned out. The h-index doesn't really tell the whole story: 11 isn't a big number for this area but it could mean 11 papers with citation numbers in the teens or (as in this case) four of them with over 100 citations. I think the highly cited research papers, together with the stories about his research in ''Wired'' and the ''New York Times'', are enough. But given the sockpuppetry here and the pattern of promotional edits to the article by anonymous users, some level of protection may be warranted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:WIKIPUFFERY||WP:PEACOCK)