Deletion of Mass civilian casualties of Israeli bombing, shelling and rocket attacks on the Gaza Strip

Comment: This kind of article has a huge number of precedents on Wikipedia: it is a standard practice to make overview articles listing events coming under a single topic definition as here. It mirrors perfectly Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, which no one objects to, let alone the 16 articles that accompany it. The objections (so far) appear spurious. If the title is long, it can be reduced. There is no synthesis involved - lists compile items so the question of  is fatuous. It is no use claiming , because the other stuff works out to deal with Israeli victims, and only begs the question: why do editors, in violation of NPOV, think only one side of a story can be documented in this manner? It cannot be merged, because you can't merge an overview article into a list which itself registers 16 articles, none dealing with an overview. Distaste is not a valid objection. Finally, there is a massive amount of high quality RS dealing with this issue, and to object to our representation of the topic is to argue that, well, it's an intensely documented reality, but we don't want it on an encyclopedia, for what reason, no one can explain
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: to List of Israeli attacks on Palestine#Gaza Strip. The article title is ridiculously cumbersome, so no '''redirect'''. It's  to classify most of these incidents as "mass casualty", and there's no need for two lists covering the basically the same subject
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:POVFORK - casualties of conflict are properly addressed as part of the article(s) about the conflict and the purpose of creating a separate article and the hodgepodge of  in this instance seems only to  be to serve the purpose of pushing a particular angle of one side of the conflict; secondly  -  ''a priori'' excludes Israeli casualties of Palestinian bombing, shelling and rocket attacks; furthermore "mass civilian casualties" are undefined 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POVPUSH||WP:OR)

Comment: but rename to something a little more concise.  The article itself lists a number of references from reliable sources (note that it’s messy right now; the sources should be inline supporting statements in the actual article to avoid original research and unsourced statements in the article) and the topic itself is notable, so it easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)