Deletion of 1401 Lavonne

Comment: per  () No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) or too little coverage to provide significant commentary on the object. If someone wants to provide a translation of the 1 paper {{u|Andrew Davidson}} indicated, I'd be happy to take a look and reconsider.   refers to cleaning up articles by removing problematic text in them, not cleaning up unnotable articles that no one can establish notability for.  This is '''exactly''' what AFD is for. &#8213;&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO||WP:NASTCRIT||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: per : quite a few ghits, but nothing substantive. Unable to establish notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DWMP)

Comment: Another cookie-cutter nomination without regard to the facts of the matter, per  and .  For example, one can immediately find a paper specifically about this asteroid — ''Nueva órbita del asteroide 1401 "Lavonne"'' — but the nomination makes no reference to this.  These nominations are obviously being spammed in a disruptive manner without any due diligence.  |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP)