Deletion of Tapani Koivuniemi

Comment: but probably '''rename.''' We should almost certainly have an article about the cult itself.  It has extensive coverage across literally dozens of |reliable sources.  I could go either way on the guy himself, but if anything the existing article should probably be renamed to be about the organization and not him, since you are right that it is mostly about the organization currently
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as . If the cult is notable it needs to be build well-sourced from the ground up to avoid saying things like this about living people. Note that most BLP policies apply to everything said about living people, both in biographies and in general articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)