Deletion of Sydney Ling2

Comment: seems to me that the Guinness Book of Records mention and the other external sources constitute multiple third-party coverage per . As to calling him "Lord", the article does not ''demand'' this, it simply claims that he is sometimes credited under that title (although ideally this statement should be sourced). (For all we know it could be his actual title - hereditary titles do exist in Holland, and he would be entitled to use the stated form if he were the eldest son of a hereditary peer. Even if it's a false title, that doesn't make him inherently non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)