Deletion of Franchise Hockey Manager (2nd nomination)

Comment: Two good reviews could establish . Perhaps someone could cut the long list above to just two, and it would be easier for anyone to judge those. I see sources which do not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: as illustrated above, there are a good few reliable sources available, which seem to me to be sufficient to meet erify|verifiability and the |general notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and . I found a http://www.gamezone.com/reviews/2013/10/05/franchise-hockey-manager-2014-review-thank-goodness-hockey-is-back single review, but that still doesn't meet . All of the other sources I found—including sources generally found to be Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources|reliable by WikiProject Video games—were trivial or primary/press releases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:GNG)