Deletion of Energy Liger

Comment: per nom. No bad faith present. Reasons to keep are |ad hominem attacks against the nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:ADHOM)

Comment: The nomination makes total sense. The article has zero references, so it can't possibly establish notability. Notability isn't automatic, it needs to be |shown. Merely being "one of over 200 species of biomechanical lifeforms depicted by TOMY's Zoids model, toy, and media franchise" doesn't make it ''de facto'' worth an independent article (are there notability guidelines for toys? If there are, I severely doubt they say "every toy automatically deserves its own article"). This is similar to the deletion discussions of the hundreds of Pokemon articles: if you stripped out the in-depth plot summary and trimmed the toy details down to some decent prose, you'd have maybe one paragraph of real-world content, and it would still be unreferenced. I would have recommended merger into List of Zoids, but the list seems to consist of nothing but names without any accompanying details, and anyway when there are no references there can be nothing to merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:PROVEIT)

Comment: Exists almost entirely of real world information and nominator made no reasonable effort to verify the information as required by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: only sources found establish that it existed but not |notable. It is no more notable than any other of the 5 billion toys out there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)