Deletion of List of places with fewer than ten residents

Comment: per nom, per , per lack of |notability. Article is littered with unreferenced entries, some of which are more than likely based on |original research or estimations rather than anything that is verifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: Having edited this page few times to add the odd referenced russian settlement, I have seen it grow from quite an interesting list to an unmanageable mess. The uninhabited section is ridiculous and now takes up half the article, despite having a link to List of ghost towns, which surely is duplication. In addition there are places noted as uninhabited that have never been inhabited. This is patently illogial as there is essentially an infinite number of places that could be described as "uninhabited" depending on how small an area you defined as a "place". For the remainder of the article, I have  conerns as well (which are also noted by others on the article talk page) as stopping at ten is an inherently arbitrary decision. I can see how there might be encyclopedic value in an article along the lines of List of settlements with one resident where settlement (or whatever word was used) would indicate an officially recognised "place", not just a house or general area, and one that was still in official existence, not one that had been abolished yet still had inhabitants. I don't however see much possibility of constructing such an article from this one as most of the places noted here as having one person populations either are unreferenced in the place's own article or do not even mention population. A shame though because it is quite an interesting set of links
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: another silly list, for all sorts of reasons.  Why 10 and not 11?  Nobody lives in my backyard, and that's a place, so shouldn't that be included?  Disney World has lots of visitors but no residents, so it should technically be listed, as should most shopping malls, office parks, factories, etc.   protects us from this kind of thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: I am expressing a concern that this article falls under . A place could mean a road or a settlement, but I don't find this list helpful and notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per . The fact that they have fewer than ten residents isn't very defining either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per above: it is a |hopeless mess, and it is |not a well-defined list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:LIST)