Deletion of Criticism of debt

Comment: Poorly developed  of Usury and specifically Usury#Religious context. Article title is POVish
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: The title frames the topic in an inherently biased way, contrary to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: to parent article Debt#Criticisms. I am, somewhat regretfully, mostly in agreement with BeZet on this. There's a lot of potential for this to be a great article, as there's a lot that has been written about it, but at the moment it seems partly a |POV Fork, but is overall just incomplete. In comparison, the section Debt#Criticisms, while certainly not perfect and definitely under-cited, is more representative and probably a better start. It's also not so long that it would require a split-off into a separate article. Some of the religious content might warrant a merge, but much is better covered in other articles, like usury, Islamic banking and finance, and Loans and interest in Judaism
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)