Deletion of Siya Kakkar

Comment: nothing shows this person is notable, outside of dying, clear  situation Best Wishes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: A very tragic case but not notable. Her popularity on social media would not have passed muster at  and her untimely suicide does not add any notability. '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree that it was my fault to create a controversial article like this where the focus is mostly given related to the death of the subject more than the career of the person. I agree the article is obviously is a  and fails to comply with . I actually thought twice before whether it will be suitable to create an article like this. But I created this article after seeing a wide media coverage globally excluding India about this person including ''CNN''. It was my bad to use ''The Sun (United Kingdom)|The Sun'' as a source in the article given its accuracy issues. It was just a random contribution from me for the Women in Red campaign. I agree to what fellow Wikipedians think about whether to keep this article or delete this. Thanks. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: Search results yielded news about her death, an indication of . Other than that, I barely found anything about her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per . Outside of her unfortunate death by suicide, the person isn't really all that notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: WP:1E. Since the event is the only thing that makes this article |notable, it should only cover the event - while the person is not notable, the event certainly is. Renaming the article to ''Siya Kakkar suicide'' should suffice
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)