Deletion of World of Boxing

Comment: The nominator says "Poor refs -- all are Russian"; this is explicitly counter to , which says that sources do not have to be in English. I don't speak Russian either, but I used Google Translate, and the coverage appears to be significant. The first reference is for an article titled "https://www.sovsport.ru/boxing/articles/2:872896-mir-boksa-pod-arestom:-nalogovaya-slujba-zablokirovala-scheta-promouterskoy-kompanii World of Boxing under arrest: the tax service has blocked the accounts of the promotion company" from Sovsport.ru, the second is "https://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2016/07/5784ffc39a7947ed3764d592 Money in the ring: Is it possible to earn money in boxing in Russia" focuses on the World of Boxing founder from RBC.ru. Personally, I'm not familiar with those sources and I don't know if they're reliable, but neither the nominator or the delete voters have bothered to explain why we shouldn't consider them acceptable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are https://www.forbes.ru/forbeslife/sport-i-zdorove/325381-bitvy-patriotov-kto-ustraivaet-boi-professionalnykh-russkikh-bokse Forbes Russia (a paragraph about World of Boxing) and https://www.rbc.ru/magazine/2016/07/5784ffc39a7947ed3764d592 RBK (whole article; it's RBK Group), it's more or less everything for , the rest is either news about fights organized by World of Boxing or news about corruption scandals, and both type do not give notability by . But the Forbes Russian calls it "largest boxing promotion company in Russia, almost monopoly", if it is any valuable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:INHERITORG)