Deletion of WGOT-LP

Comment:  is clear about what it is trying to exclude: ''All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, provided that discussion is properly referenced.'' This article may need expansion but  in not a valid reason for this deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Whether it is speculation or not, it requires |reliable sources to demonstrate its notability. Radio stations that exist (or are guaranteed to exist soon) are not automatically notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: My understanding is that all federally licensed stations ARE automatically notable.  They are all licensed to serve the public (unlike other businesses).  If there is a policy that says otherwise, please cite it.  Assuming I am correct, it appears the only question is whether a future tag is appropriate or if the station has to wait until it is broadcasting, which is covered in the linked discussion above.  can't apply, as it isn't speculation when the future opening is documented either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)