Deletion of Secret Service codenames

Comment: per nom.  is not a valid criterion for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: It's a list, but |a list is valid WP content (as opposed to #IINFO). The topic itself ("why is this information collected together?") here isn't OR (I just added some more cites that Secret Service actually does codenames, not just a Hollywood construct) and the scope is explicit and well-defined
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:NOT)

Comment: but ''not'' per nom.  This is at the moment just a list, and not a useful source of information on things such as how the codenames are given or when they are given.  However, I am certain that a point like "some of the information in this article is wrong" isn't a reason to delete it, as that's not what  says.  It says that reliable sources must be found.  So ignore the  part of the prod nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The source that is being used lists a Spooks|TV Program codename for Queen Elizabeth II That shows how it does not pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)