Deletion of Holly Hunt

Comment: There is sufficient in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to meet our |notability requirements. There is enough sourced material from the references in the article and the ones found by {{u|Rebbing}} (independent and ) about the subject to write a short verifiable article and it does not violate |what Wikipedia is not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:ISNOT)

Comment: as the coverage plainly satisfies |GNG. In finding the requisite significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, I primarily rely on the December 2014 ''Wall Street Journal'' article (cited above) and a March 2016 piece in '':Architectural Digest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per  and Rebbing's sources, above. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per variety of  sources listed above (and thanks for your research to the editors who uncovered them). Agree that Chicago Trib source is particularly compelling at establishing significance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)