Deletion of David Wong (writer)

Comment: The subject surely passes  #3 and #4 as his work "has been the subject of a... feature-length film", received "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" and "has won significant critical attention". The same references of the article include many secondary reliable sources. I don't see where is the problem here, and the same nominator fails to give a valid reason for deletion (as "known only by movie and book" surely is not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Ample coverage of him on multiple reliable sources.  He clearly passes  #1 and #2, as his episodes and other work are seen by millions.  Also  #4 since his work has "won significant critical attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: George Sand is not a real name, either. In any event, Wong has written two well-reviewed books (the other being ''This Book Is Full of Spiders: Seriously, Dude, Don't Touch It''). A clear pass of #3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)