Deletion of List of highest paid mayors (2nd nomination)

Comment: this is both  (as the "highest-paid" is compiled from a lot of individual salary information, and is certainly incomplete), and trivia.  Wikipedia is generally not a directory of people's salaries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: This article is not a  because this subject of the highest wage of mayors is often discussed in reliable sources, as revieled by a quick google search. what makes it appear to be  is the way the information is presented, but this can be changed; is not a reason for deletion when the overall theme of the article easily meets the 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Wikipedia is not a book of world records, and it certainly shouldn't be a used to publish rankings established through the original research of Wikipedia editors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per nominator and other comments suggesting . This article would not be manageable otherwise given the currencies differ in other countries and the fact remuneration changes almost annually in many cities
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Pending some evidence of sources actually listing highest-paid mayors in order; the sources currently cited in the article appear to simply be used to verify individual salaries, not where said salaries fall in the "list", which is an OR nightmare. Additionally, since the list will never be comprehensive, assuming the ones whose salaries can be verified are the highest-paid in the world is probably somewhat : surely mayors in countries with lax corruption legislation are by definition higher paid (if not higher ''salaried'') than most of those listed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMIC)