Deletion of List of bus routes in Southampton

Comment: It is most unlikely that significant coverage in reliable secondary sources will ever be found for this material. The article fails |General Notability Guideline, |Notability of Standalone Lists guideline, |Wikipedia is not a Directory, |Wikipedia Stand Alone List Guideline |Wikipedia is not a Travel Guide and |Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate information. If this sort of material is kept it is always liable to become outdated and a source of misinformation if editors concerned lose interest. Even if we have legal indemnity against any unfortunate consequences of providing wrong data we have a moral responsibility to avoid doing so, not to mention the potential damage to WP's reputation. It is not just a case of not liking it as there are sound reasons for not keeping it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTESAL||WP:NOTDIR||WP:SAL||WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:IINFO)

Comment: This is a perfectly encyclopaedic list. Yes it needs referencing (but sources are very likely to exist, given the presence of them for rural parts of Hampshire, and Southampton is an important city), expansion and work on colour. None of these are reasons to delete though. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Peterborough (2nd nomination) for a detailed refutation of the arguments that  disallows lists of bus routes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Like with similar articles up for afd, this is a perfectly valid |standalone list of routes of a major bus system in a major city.  Bus routes are integral parts of the workings of a city infrastructure and that is ''very'' encyclopedic.  I see "WP is not a directory" quotes frequently in bus route nominations but there is actually nothing in  that bans list articles, nor list articles of bus routes. This isn't a "repositories of loosely associated topics" or anything of the like and this list is ''very'' discriminate.  I also notice the nom and the delete voters are simply stating lists of bus routes are unencyclopedic in general and not making a case to delete this list article of ''this'' specific city's bus routes, yet again they haven't touched the List of bus routes in London List of bus routes in Manhattan or the like which one would imagine are much more colossal violations of encyclopedic content to those who don't like bust list articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STAND||WP:DIRECTORY)