Deletion of OmarGoshTV (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per {{u|BrownHairedGirl}} and nom. This would be an encyclopedic (see what I did there) example of a hardly notable 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The article now has a long list of sources, but it doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. 3 of the 13 references are to OG's own Youtube channel; another 4 are to online tabloids (OhMyMg.com,  PureBreak.com,  Right This Minute, Manila Republic); 4 are less tabloid sources which don't meet  (San Francisco Globe, Metro, Yorkshire Standard, Christian Post). That leaves only 2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Does not ascertain |notability which is also not |inherited and the article is a recreation of a previously deleted article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Even if the last AFD was 'Hijacked' I still don't feel this is notable and the argument of |other stuff exists like this is not a valid argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: as the sources seen to be either passing mentions in local papers or unreliable sources (YouTube). Also, {{reply|Hawkeye75}} You need to provide a rationale for deletion when you nominate, as otherwise it will normally be #1| speedily kept.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)