Deletion of Herb usage 2

Comment: Per , especially . Unencyclopedic. It would be great for this AfD to be closed with a result other than "no consensus", so to that end, I'll say that I'd be OK with merging everything together, with significant trimming and condensing, and redirecting the individual articles, assuming someone is willing to take on that task. But my strong first preference is deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IINFO)

Comment: Awful. Violates several strands of , such as not a dictionary and not a how-to. Furthermore, the "Latin Names" are meaningless - they're mangled versions of the actual species name, with Herba set in front - this has nothing to do with any identification scheme ever used in Latin, and is pure |original research, and, furthermore, makes it absolutely uselesss for the #DICTIONARY|forbidden-on-Wikipedia dictionary use which is the only point of these articles. This makes it unsuitable even for transwiki
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:NOT)

Comment: largely unsourced dumps of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: to Wiktionary Wikipedia is |not a Dictionary entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)