Deletion of Muggeseggele

Comment: does not seem to be a notable usage, certainly not in English, nor other than trivial. While this is not a pure hoax, there is a student-joke quality to this material that basically just brings the project into disrepute. There is no censorship here, just a preference for worthwhile material. The article is basically about a word, so  may well apply also. The comparisons with possible English counterparts suggest 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT||WP:OR)

Comment: I'm sorry, but I just don't see it. A word that may have an iconic status in German doesn't necessarily make the grade in English. The article is about a #DICTIONARY|German word, sourced almost entirely in German. The three or so English citations do "bugger all" in defining or documenting the word's status in English usage &ndash; in fact they merely point to the use of "gnat's crotch" |without drawing any specific reference to the German term. Pardon my French ;-), but we quite rightly don't see entries to "''connard''" or "''p&eacute;d&eacute;''" for that same reason despite the fact these are equally "iconic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)