Deletion of Kim Kardashian effect

Comment: Meets . The term has existed for more than seven years http://www.kabobfest.com/2008/08/the-kim-kardashian-effect-on-arab-and-middle-eastern-women.html, is still used today, and will likely be used in the future. There's a decent source used in the article http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2014/may/29/pencil-skirts-the-kim-kardashian-effect. And more that are not used http://nypost.com/2011/11/02/the-kim-kardashian-effect/, http://www.businessinsider.com/kardashian-effect-makes-mason-the-2-most-popular-baby-name-2012-5, http://americasmarkets.usatoday.com/2014/07/21/stock-soars-10-on-kardashian-effect/, http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Life/Living/2014/Nov-12/277381-kardashian-effect-surgery-padded-panties-in-demand.ashx, http://www.independent.ie/style/beauty/hair/the-kim-effect-catches-on-jared-leto-shows-off-copy-cat-blonde-bob-as-he-poses-with-kris-jenner-31046498.html, https://au.tv.yahoo.com/sunrise/video/watch/17706007/the-kardashian-effect/#page1. (Bonus points for sources from many counties: United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Lebanon, Australia) And some guy wrote a book about it http://www.amazon.com/The-Kardashian-Effect-Michael-Wiser-ebook/dp/B00EH9HLTS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: most of it seems to be /. The term would probably warrant a few sentences in the Kim Kardashian article, but hardly an article by itself. Being a |neologism, I don't think several sources from fashion magazines/columns are enough to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:NEO||WP:GNG)