Deletion of 0-D Beat Drop

Comment: Being unreferenced is not a valid deletion reason. An admitted failure to follow the procedures of  readers this, IMO a bad faith nomination which should quite possibly be  closed promptly. AfD should not be used as article cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SNOW)

Comment: per improper deletion rationale of a |NEW ARTICLE.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=0-D_Beat_Drop&action=history  A lack of  or wishing deletion |because a notable topic needs work are not valid deletion rationales.  In |looking before opining I immediately found that this '''was''' reviewed by http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/11/10/0d-beat-drop-review ''IGN''  http://nzgamer.com/reviews/1022/zero-d-beat-drop-xbla.html ''NZGamer'' then I found that |these reviews and others were all linked through http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/zero-d-beat-drop ''Metacritic''. We do not delete notable topics whose articles simply need work, and AFD is |not intended to force cleanup. See ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:BEFORE||WP:UGLY||WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:WIP||WP:DEADLINE)