Deletion of Comparison of backup software

Comment: Why was this nominated 15 minutes after initial creation?  There are certainly other software comparison articles that have been accepted on WP & I don't see why we couldn't have on on backup software.  I'm very surprised to see this  by JzG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: WP:IINFO|Indiscriminate selection with respect to both products and features. A comprehensive table could only be constructed by |original research using WP:primary sources|primary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:original research)

Comment: We literally have hundreds of such comparison on Wikipedia.  Many software comparisons in Wikipedia have survived deletion.  I think the only reason why this may not is because it is essentially a very new stub.  There is no reason that these need to be based on original research--there are  that describe the features of products & even  comparisons that may be used as a basis for the article.  Can those calling for deletion please say whether they would support recreation of this article, assuming that it was more comprehensive in the products and features that it included and assuming that it was properly sourced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: as failing . There is practically no way to complete this list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: wow, this will be a magnet for original research and personal points of view.  Impossible to properly source for "comparisons", only features.  Regardless of how old the article is, the premise is fatally flawed and can never pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: None of the problems raised by JzG and followers require the article to be deleted. The ''topic'' is not anymore  than any other software comparison table in Wikipedia. The fact that the table is incomplete is not a valid reason to delete it.  You can easily verify most of the features from the software articles linked. Adding citations to a table like that is impractical. Listing self-evident features of software is Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research/Archive_36#Inclusion_of_certain_exceptions|'''not''' OR
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)