Deletion of Stanley Salmons

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: He only has to pass one of the  criteria. It's possible he passes via '''3.''' ''(is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor)'' As a Fellow of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, this might qualify. http://www.ipem.ac.uk/aboutipem/benefitsofmembership/membershipcategories/Pages/Fellowship.aspx This page details the requirements for that. Not sure he passes '''5.''' (''holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research''). He was a full professor at Liverpool, which is a major UK university, but the post appears to be as an ordinary professor not the holder of a  "Named" or "Distingished" chair. Professor Emeritus is a title given to all full professors in the UK when they retire. Having said that, in his day, full professors were fairly rare in the UK. Now it's a much more common rank. I don't think '''6.''' applies (''held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.'') This tends to refer to really high posts like Vice-Chancellor, Provost, President etc. of a university or the presidency of a major academic society. If his research has been described as "pioneering" per the Georg Thieme Verlag  reference, then this might fulfill '''1.''' (''the person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline''). It would be good to have a second source affirming the pioneering nature  of his research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes rof#C1 with a Google scholar h-index of 26. This information is easily found by clicking on the link at the top
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per  - visibly improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: I'm seeing where some of his work is being cited in some textbooks such as http://books.google.com/books?id=AcWYu-VtRS0C&pg=PA250&dq=Stanley+Salmons&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LtDOULTcKKTK0AGAjoCYDg&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBg this one from Tectum Verlag and http://books.google.com/books?id=T0fbq_b89cAC&pg=PA175&dq=%22Stanley+Salmons%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=h9HOULqdI7HK0AGAy4CIBw&ved=0CEsQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=%22Stanley%20Salmons%22&f=false this one from Wolters Kluwer Health. I'm not as familiar with WKH, but Tectum Verlag is supposed to be a peer-reviewed academic publisher from what I can remember of it. He might pass  with some digging? He looks like he's one of those guys that is cited often, but isn't really ever written directly about. (Except for by WWN, lol
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR)