Deletion of Tomas Lasansky

Comment: The publisher 4PeaksPress, which produced the book on Lasansky is Lasansky's own vanity press, existing solely to produce that book. See the address http://www.4peakspress.com/ here for the publisher, and http://www.lasanskystudio.com/Home.html here for the artist himself: same address. The other sources (one other book in the article and the several mentioned above) are mostly not independent of the artist. Gallery publications by themselves cannot be reliable sources as they are published to promote an artist exhibiting at the gallery. Likewise, government listings are not . The press coverage is extremely limited, with only a couple going beyond passing mention. In short, based on available sources, this fails notability requirements. I will remain neutral until I've done a bit more digging around
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Clearly failed  and I couldn't find any evidence of passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Per my comments above, I cannot find anything that satisfies  or . He's an artist who has exhibited his work. That does not make him notable. The most significant exhibition is the Smite Museum of Art, which is a university gallery. Not bad, but not significant by itself. The only third-party sources that go beyond a passing mention are local press. Again, not bad but by themselves do not approach the threshold required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)