Deletion of Cuckservative

Comment: Perhaps a year from now this will be a 'thing' but for now it fails . For something like this we should require a ''lot'' more sourcing, and what is in the article is just about what there is out there other than blogs and tweets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: A few mentions over a few weeks does not a thing make. Per , it's much too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: The current article uses clearly biased language I would expect at Metapedia, like "betrayal of the ethnic interests of White European Americans" It also has soapboxing sentences like "The rationales given for these public policy positions, may be dismissed as an attempt to appeal to ethnic minority voters, whilst ignoring their white counterparts, or as a cowardly or otherwise expedient attempt to avoid moral condemnation and slander by leftists." See .  also applies, the term is very new and clearly pushed by biased editors here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NEO)

Comment: per . It's a week old, wrapped up in a bunch of other far-right political concepts, and shows no indication of lasting significant coverage of the term. It may be worth noting that the Washington Post connects this to Gamergate, which means we might see more SPAs (already two above). &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Nearly a 'dozen blue chip' sources, so the article meets all the demands of  : significant coverage from reliable and notable independent mainstream secondary sources. I think the page should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is about as important as Binders full of women. Now, I firmly believe that Binders full of women should have been deleted for  and , but it wasn't. And I'd rather see uniformity of logic being applied at this point. I do highly question the use of Breitbart since I'd hardly consider that publication reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:BELONG||WP:NEO)