Deletion of Vidyashilp Academy (3rd nomination)

Comment: WP:BJAODN. Per TWin. Lets look at this article - some of the best b/s i have ever seen. Its so notable they dont even have an official website mentioned. No |RS. Google says nothing about it. |Aquinascruft all over again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:AQC)

Comment: Firstly, there is no notability policy specific to schools in existence, so we have to default back to  in the case of this article. The debate on school notability is still out, and I don't see a chance of a reasonable guideline gaining community acceptance anytime soon, and as the Schools deletion queue shows, the jury is still out on the matter. The notability benchmark for this article has not been met, because there has been no significant reliable coverage from sources independent of the article's subject. Further to this, the article does not meet  on account of any  being provided to support the information included. To top it all off, significant portions of the article breach  being lifted word for word from the school's own website. This is another one of those great |schoolcruft examples which we have come to know and loathe
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:COPYVIO||WP:SCFT)

Comment: secondary schools are not automatically all notable; this school apparently gets a lot of attention from high levels (e.g ''The Hindu'' publishes their sports results and chess tournament standings), but I don't see any non-trivial discussion to support encyclopedic notability. http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?q=%22vidyashilp+academy%22&sa=N&start=0 The 91 non-duplicate Google web hits http://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22vidyashilp+academy%22+-wikipedia+-wikimapia&hl=en&safe=active&start=90&sa=N don't contain any additional . Might be a "keep" if I saw evidence of a lot of notable alumni or something
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)