Deletion of Stealing Summers

Comment: per meeting  and  by having requisite more-than-trivial commentary and analysis... even if in |Spanish sources.https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Stealing+Summers%22&num=50#q=%22Stealing+Summers%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=gXGQUNzdD8rTigKj2IGYAQ&ved=0CB8QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=2b955bbbc36d8184&bpcl=36601534&biw=1014&bih=589http://www.stealingsummers.com/Press/Jagger_for_Rolling_Stone.PDF ''Rolling Stone'' seems more that a "brief mention", and these http://www.stealingsummers.com/Press/Spanish_Press_Clips.PDF other Spanish soutces are more than tivial.  Article could benefit from use of these sources and regular editing, as non English coverage would certainly be expected for even an English language film premiered outside the US. It being |unknown here is not a valid reason to delete.  anyone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NONENG||WP:UNKNOWNHERE||WP:CSB)

Comment: A search turned up only trivial references in Spanish media in relation to its filming and a small-ish film festival. Does not meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILMS)

Comment: Has received coverage from reliable, independent sources. Coverage not trivial (e.g., times of film showing) as illustrated in . The fact that the coverage is in Spanish is irrelevant to the question of whether the film is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE)