Deletion of Erin Ness

Comment: per . Notability is not subjective, and this person is not notable. Not verifiable due to lack of sources, and there isn't enough content to warrent keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Multiple television appearances, part of the http://www.maximonline.com/articles/index.aspx?a_id=7118 Maxim 100, vast amounts of mentions on notable websites, and not even the slightest justification for nomination aside from an uniformed POV.  Seriously, making frivilous nominations like this is a rude waste of every one's time.  Do some reasearch before nominating articles that you have no knowledge about. At the very least type the name in a search engine for pete's sake. Since she plainly meets criteria of  and  a withdrawal of the nom and speedy close are in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: If there are hundreds (of what isn't too clear) then they don't seem to have made an appearance in the article. On the face of it the article doesn't meet  or . So may I make a suggestion to the author? Ante up or leave the game. Thank you, I'm here all this week, please try the veal
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)