Deletion of Dewi Driegen

Comment: for Fabiana Semprebom, Danita Angell and Marcelle Bittar. '''Weak keep''' for Fernanda Tavares for her presence in Sports Illustrated https://www.si.com/swimsuit-2007/photo/2007/02/15/fernanda-taveres-2007-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-edition-si-com.  My very low threshold due to the majority of the identified sources above being mentions or appearances in foreign language publications is a single media profile in English in a reliable source in the first ten pages of Google results. Besides standard directory listings on the New York Magazine site for Driegen http://nymag.com/fashion/models/ddriegen/dewidriegen/ and Tavares http://nymag.com/fashion/models/ftavares/fernandatavares/, there's nothing else I saw that met this admittedly low bar. With no English biographical info to source from, all four fail , but Tavares just meets the  carveout for the SI appearance. I'm unconvinced that the others' appearances in fashion magazines are notable enough to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMODEL||WP:NMODEL)

Comment: all of them. Sources , and I really wonder whether  has been done: "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search". The articles do need more citations, but that is not a reason to bring them to AfD - "If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Re '''Dewi Driegen''': ''Vogue'' has a profile of her on The Vogue List. https://web.archive.org/web/20160324105650/http://www.vogue.fr/thevoguelist/thevoguelist/dewi-driegen/483 I presume that this is a , as ''Vogue'' magazine is? Also, what about model profiles on ''New York Magazine''? http://nymag.com/fashion/models/ddriegen/dewidriegen
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The reason I nominated these is that just because sources “exist” out there, doesn’t mean they’re automatically reliable or even usable. Marcelle Bittar stands completely unreferenced. Dewi Driegen only has a models.com profile that doesn’t show anything the article says. Danita Angell has a dead link and a FashionModelDirectory profile. Fabiana Semprebom’s article has absolutely no information about her career and just a models.com profile. I said it at the jump, no sources are out there to even verify this information. Articles must have references that people can |actually see and use. These picture books are not meant to support a whole article and should only be used as a last resort ''if'' that. If a model does Dior, for example, typically there is a magazine article, whether https://www.vogue.com/article/fashion-week-fall-2016-models-designer-exclusive brief or a https://www.vogue.com/article/indira-scott-model-new-york-fashion-week-braids-beads-hair-beauty spotlight, that exhibits that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: How can we possibly assess all of these articles in one AfD? I'm not sure what the same problem they have in common is supposed to be - on a quick look at several, some are sourced only to Models.com, some don't have that as a source and have other sources instead, including magazine articles which need to be assessed for  .... Please relist separately, so they can each be assessed on their own merits
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: all as RebeccaGreen has found several supporting sources, there are more sources available in foreign-language media (esp. Portuguese), and the nomination seems to be founded on some basic misunderstandings about , searches, and sourcing. The fact that the multiple articles in this potential  are not actually related to each other, and aren't from the same page creator, doesn't help, nor does the nominator's multiple adjustments to the list of nominated subjects during an ongoing AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:TRAINWRECK)

Comment: For '''Fabiana Semprebom''', sources : a Google Books search shows snippet views of the following
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: For '''Danita Angell''', I found a bit less, and some of what I have found will, I am sure, not be considered  because they are original magazines for sale on ecommerce sites, or scanned and posted on blogs. However, they do verify some of the content
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: No reliable references cited. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)