Deletion of How Global Warming Works

Comment: I see you now believe NPR http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2013/12/15/251437395/global-warming-explained-in-about-a-minute is a reliable source? I think ''Scientific American'' http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/2013/12/17/global-warming-explained-in-under-a-minute/ is also a reliable source? Oh yeah, and it was covered in ''The Washington Post'' http://knowmore.washingtonpost.com/2013/12/18/global-warming-explained-in-just-21-seconds/. I forgot, there is also ''Yahoo! News'' http://news.yahoo.com/keeping-simple-scientist-uses-haiku-explain-climate-change-012137912.html article on it.  All sources in the article when it was nominated. Oops, I just noticed it's covered at Phys.org http://phys.org/news/2014-01-global-words-seconds.html. I guess it doesn't fail |the notability critera for a website after all? I think there is a whiff of Climate change denial in this nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEBCRIT)

Comment: The article is not even remotely promotional and the website it describes meets the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)