Deletion of International Marxist Tendency

Comment: the first source you cite is from Vonk which is IMT's affiliate in Holland so it's not an independent source. The second and third source, both from the same book, do not establish notability - the IMT is not actually mentioned in the body of the book but only in passing in two endnotes. Endonte 10 cites an article from the IMT's In Defence of Marxism website but says nothing about the IMT itself and if one scrolls up to endnote 10's origin in the body of the text on http://books.google.ca/books?id=3cU5ELUxXAEC&lpg=PA228&ots=tOaFwVPqSO&dq=%22international%20marxist%20tendency%22%20nyt&pg=PA7#v=onepage&q=%22international%20marxist%20tendency%22%20nyt&f=false page 7 there's no reference to the IMT whatsoever so this source does not establish notability. The second endnote, Endnote 243, is about Youth for International Socialism and mentions the IMT in passing and if one goes up to http://books.google.ca/books?id=5Bvn1dqVbIkC&lpg=PA88&dq=%22International%20Marxist%20Tendency%22&pg=PA88#v=onepage&q=%22International%20Marxist%20Tendency%22&f=false page 88 to see what is being endnoted it's actually about a Marx and Engels quote that is quoted in a Youth for International Socialism publication and again doesn't actually say anything about the IMT let alone establish its notability so the material you have provided does nothing to satisfy  or . Simply being mentioned in passing in the footnotes of one book is not sufficient to provide independent verification of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:N)

Comment: according to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)

Comment: per nominators reasons. Does not appear to satisfy  or  via significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Arguments of "We should cover such and such type of organization" or "It's an umbrella organization" or "It's global"  smack of "I like it"  and are not compelling reasons to keep it. The links provided by NJWine include a PDF from a Dutch Marxist website, which does not appear to be a reliable source, and which is certainly not independent , since http://www.vonk.org/wat-is-vonk.htm they say they are affiliated with the "International Marxist Tendency." and two bare mentions or passing references in published books, inadequate to show notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:N)

Comment: The existence of other articles which do not demonstrate satisfaction of  is not a valid reason to keep this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I support the lowest of all possible bars to inclusion of articles for political parties, their youth sections, and their leaders without respect to ideology. This is exactly the sort of material that SHOULD be in an encyclopedia. Unfortunately, there is a pretty high  factor for matters of politics, which results periodically in ill-considered nominations such as this one. Sources to follow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Nothing here addresses the reasons given for deletion, in particular  and . Deletion should be without prejudice so that if independent, verifiable sources establishing notability arise a new article can be created. Deletion has nothing to do with this group's political positions but with its notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:N)

Comment: but cleanup page.  This article is in serious need of repair because most of the references are from one website.  However, the subject matter is mentioned in a number of |independent sourceshttp://www.vonk.org/PDF/Marxisme-for-dummies-de-basis.pdf,http://books.google.com/books?id=3cU5ELUxXAEC&pg=PA228&lpg=PA228&dq=%22international+marxist+tendency%22+nyt&source=bl&ots=tOaFwVPqSO&sig=kSjdovJIHD5BwFEpO_JNZdaFB-E&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_YzGT5zIG9K00AHEvfWSCw&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=%22international%20marxist%20tendency%22%20nyt&f=false,http://books.google.com/books?id=5Bvn1dqVbIkC&pg=PA88&dq=%22International+Marxist+Tendency%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=RY7GT5C7EKnZ0QHV_4WSCw&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22International%20Marxist%20Tendency%22&f=false, and thus Wikipedia's |organizational notability guideline is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:ORG)

Comment: See:  :  the organization is international in scope and information can be confirmed by multiple sources.  Also, a lot of information on minor left-wing groups does not appear in Google books and scholar, but can be found in libraries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)

Comment: Your comments about the "history," the "origin,"  the:"strand" and the "national sections" abysmally fail the relevant Wikipedia notability guideline 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)