Deletion of VR6 engine

Comment: I'm no engineer, but this appears to differ from a standard V6 (transverse configuration, firing order etc) and is therefore a separately |notable topic. Google returns more than 2 million hits, so even if only 1% of them are valid, it can easily be referenced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly a different animal than a standard V6. Passes GNG, as it is significantly covered by multiple pieces of independently published material. See, for example, Jason Cammisa, http://www.automobilemag.com/features/news/1008_volkswagen_vr6_engine/ "The Six-Cylinder Survivor," ''Auomobile'' magazine, July 21, 2010. See also: Lewis Kingston, http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/scoop/vws-new-496bhp-30-litre-vr6-engine "VW's new 496bhp 3.0-litre VR6 engine," Autocar.co.uk/, May 9, 2013. See also: http://karmakanix.com/knowledgebase/engines/gas-engines-vw-audi/vr6-engine/ "VR6 Engine: A Staggering Technology," Karmakanix auto repair. See also: Jason Slu, http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2013/09/volkswagens-next-vr6-engine-could-be-twin-turbo.html "Volkswagen’s Next VR6 Engine Could be Twin Turbo," autoguide.com, Sept. 26, 2013. See also: . One of the worst nominations of the month, it would seem, copious sources abound in even a cursory search. If the flag for MORE SOURCES offends thee, time is better invested sourcing out a piece than running it through AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)