Deletion of Kepler-124b

Comment: I wish there was significant information about the planet. But the article contains nothing but entries pulled from a table, doesn't need an article for that. The only information not already present under  List of exoplanets discovered using the Kepler spacecraft seems to be derived numbers, which probably qualify as  anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I did find this topic interesting enough to edit the article, but unfortunately I couldn't find much more information than was already included. I read through  and the discussions on the talk page about exoplanets, and the discussion seems somewhat split on whether or not exoplanets are notable in and of themselves. Certainly the first several were, but now that they are becoming more common, some fall on the side of requiring independent coverage (essentially following NASTRO) and others on the side of keeping all exoplanets that meet certain objective observable criteria (no consensus was reached regarding the exact criteria). If pressed for a !vote I would probably err on the side of keeping it, as honestly this is the sort of thing I would probably use Wikipedia to find (being an astronomy nerd since I was a little kid), but I realize that I'm very likely in the minority on this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)