Deletion of Gapforce

Comment: WP:Before nominating an article for deletion, you should check Google News Archive and Google Books for any reliable and independent sources with substantial coverage, to see if the notability guideline ( in this case) is satisfied. It is not limited to the refs presently cited in the article. At Google News Archive there are several similar stories from March 2009:http://www.essentialtravel.co.uk/news/travel-news-article6686.asp, coverage from later in 2009: http://www.yearoutgroup.org/Year-Out-Group-Gap-Year-News/Australasian-countries-are-safest-gap-year-destinations-19386144-News.htm, and some coverage from 2010: http://www.traveldaily.co.uk/AsiaPacificNews/Detail.aspx?Section=17441. Google Book search shows substantial coverage of Greenforce and Gapforce:http://books.google.com/books?id=r4tzhU7WGEcC&pg=PA253&dq=gapforce&hl=en&ei=7e2ATZq6OoGjtgfqp8nVCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=gapforce&f=false. These refs barely support notability. Maybe someone can find others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)