Deletion of Full operating capability

Comment: It is likely looking to be a keep certainly, but I'm not particularly sure of withdrawing it, more so, as more than 50%, is the definition. In the 14th edition, which it was taken out of, there is more than 2000 definitions. Are they all going to come in, in some way? I would rather have a full sized articles, written by somebody doing decent research to try to make the reader understand what it means, rather than a definition from a glossary of terms manual. The whole point of , is exactly this; so the work is done. It's another dud article with military content that nobody understands. I think it should go. And even by the time a new article is in, it won't even called that as historical research will give it another. That is modern name. You will have 500-1000 years of military preparations and it will be an entirely different beast
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: into project commissioning per -M and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)