Deletion of Sampurna (2nd nomination)

Comment: The relevant criteria here are . I'm satisfied it meets criterion 1 in that it's national in scope. As to 2, which is a restatement of  essentially, we have coverage http://www.indianexpress.com/news/notices-sent-to-ngo-run-by-delhi-bjp-chief-s-wife/925405 in the Indian Express and http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-03-19/delhi/31209973_1_showcause-notices-wife-delhi-government Times of India of an incident revolving around its founder's political connections. Also http://www.hindu.com/2007/07/31/stories/2007073158780400.htm coverage in The Hindu re: political activities and http://www.hindu.com/2007/05/02/stories/2007050208890400.htm a rape case. There's also some other trivial-looking coverage of conferences the NGO organized and such. But I'm satisfied it meets the criteria, if only barely. More sourcing is likely to exist in Hindi
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO||WP:GNG)