Deletion of Eagle Hunter Solutions Limited (2nd nomination)

Comment: Amazingly there are a couple of sources that are suitable, but most relate to specific things rather than the actual company. https://www.khaleejtimes.com/article/20120318/ARTICLE/303189997/1036 Khalee Times does, though you have to strain our the multiple bits of interview to appreciate it. Without additional Sig Cov on the company itself then it doesn't currently pass . I've not !voted, since I haven't yet taken the  check outside of the article itself. I've broken it into three parts since my eyes were bad when reading the article and bleeding when reviewing the wikitext
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per nom and .  What's the solution in the title refer to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: Our |subject notability guidelines require rigorous sourcing and this fails by a mile.For the sake of it, the Khaleej-Times piece can be safely discounted as a non-independent source (allmost all corp-interviews are; copy-paste from director's mouth and a promo-tone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)