Deletion of Savannah Phillips

Comment: There are solid common-sense arguments being presented for Keep, and solid common-sense arguments being presented for Delete or Redirect.  That is why I asked above for arguments based on policies and guidelines.  The arguments for deletion or redirection are being presented with great certainty, as if there is a basis for them other than common sense (which cuts both ways), but the only policy argument that I see is |general notability, and she has been the subject of continued coverage, not just about her birth, but in the context of her family.  That is why I had asked if there was a guideline about royal families, and am told dismissively that there isn't an issue; however, the fact that she doesn't have a title, unlike some of her cousins, doesn't change what family she is in a branch of.  Maybe a guideline on royal families that states what members are and are not notable might be useful.  As it is, however, the only policy-based argument that I see is |general notability}}, and it does appear that that is met.  Therefore
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: What policies and guidelines are applicable beyond |general notability guidelines and |the guideline about minors?  Can we identify all of the applicable policies and guidelines?  I have not, for instance, found a guideline having to do with royal families
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MINORS)

Comment: to her father, Peter Phillips, per above. If the only coverage is her birth, that's 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to father, per Metropolitan90's suggestion and , as there's content about her there already. Fails . Succession to the British throne#Current line of succession demonstrates that the children of minor royals do not have articles about them unless they are notable for other reasons
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INVALIDBIO||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Miserably fails notability guidelines. The subject is an untitled distant relative of a royalty with no significant coverage. The subject clearly does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: It appears that the key issue has to do with what constitutes significant coverage for purpose of |general notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)