Deletion of Cleo Coyle

Comment: wasn't initially going to put in an argument on this one, but the sheer volume of Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|sockpuppetry that has cropped up on it changed my mind. This is pure spam, and Wikipedia is Wikipedia:Spam|not for spamming your product. An article like this cannot satisfy |Wikipedia's neutral point of view guideline, which is a ''fundamental policy'' for all articles. If an author is notable, someone else out there will eventually write about her. Until then, let's get rid of this advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per nomination and all arguments put forward since:notability, , . I also don't like the "has made few or no other edits outside this topic" votes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:COI)

Comment: per nom and all other arguments. Overall, huge COI issue and issues regarding the |notability of the articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)