Deletion of Tamara Rotolo (2nd nomination)

Comment: in the current form per  and . She may or may not be notable, but the current sourcing of the article is entirely inadequate for a BLP. The only sources provided are an article in the Daily Mail (a tabloid and as such not a reliable source for BLPs) and a screenshot of a primary source hosted on a random image webhost
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:V)

Comment: I don't even think you need to redirect this.  See , , , .  This woman had sex with a royal and had a child out of wedlock.  There was a scandal, but it's settled now, with little fallout to the Prince.  She is not notable b/c she had sex with a royal.  She is not notable because of the scandal, which was one event, which is now settled.  Notability is not temporary, but the previous arguments seem to speak otherwise. Should she be mentioned in the article?  Yes.  Should there even be a redirect?  I say no, based on the above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NTEMP||WP:1E||WP:NOTSCANDAL)