Deletion of Transhumanist Party

Comment: it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)

Comment: upstart political party passing  with multiple, independent sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Zoltan Istvan#Political career. I agree with those saying it is |premature for this to stand as a standalone article. As pointed out several times previously, the sources are nearly all primary and/or do not satisfy |Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources. Plus, it could be argued the subject dosen't meet the basic prerequisite for an article, which is |verified existence. From the sources currently available, it seems the only evidence of the existence of the Transhumanist Party is Zoltan Istvan saying it is a thing. While Mr. Istvan may well be a man of integrity, and may well be serious and sincere about the formation of this party, he is by no means a |secondary source. Having said all that, there seems to be no dispute about the notability of Istvan himself (and for those who might ask: "well, dosen't that make the transhumanist party notable, by extension?" |No, it dosen't). There is also no apparent objection to the party being referenced in the section of his article I've linked to above. Clearly, this Party is a significant project of his, and at the very least warrants mention in his bio. So why not merge a portion of the content of this article to that section where it can be redirected, until such time (if and when) the party clearly establishes notability in its own right as to qualify for its own article? Of course, the content would have to be condensed in a way that is in keeping with  and , but basic information about the Party would be available and easily accessible, as it would keep the term  "Transhumanist Party" in Wikipedia's search engine. If the article is redirected, I propose the edit history remain intact, for ease of restoration to the mainspace should the Party be deemed notable in its own right at some future point (which certainly seems to be a distinct possibilty). To me, this seems to be a fair, reasonable and somewhat obvious "compromise" solution, if you will. I'm a bit surprised no one has suggested it before
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:SOURCES||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:DUEWEIGHT||WP:COATRACK)