Deletion of Wikidumper.org

Comment: Recently emerged as notable.  Three more references by |reliable sources, http://news.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029694,49285019,00.htm CNEThttp://blogs.usatoday.com/techspace/2006/11/what_you_dont_k.html  USA Todayhttp://seattlepi.nwsource.com/lifestyle/293590_oldwebsites25.html Associated Press, added to article.  Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)

Comment: Wow. Talk about irony.  Anyway, the AP story linked to in the article is actually about another website.  The Alexa page rank of http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=wikidumper.blogspot.com 244,798 doesn't exactly impress either.  I'm still kind of torn since I like the idea of a blog that keeps a record of deleted WP content.  However, in the end it clearly doesn't satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No personal offense meant, but this whole thing smacks of  to me. The author even included "In an interesting twist of fate, this article has been marked for deletion form the Wikipedia." as his/her closing sentence in the original article. (I hope it's OK to comment here even if without a real account
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: bloggish, and fails . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: As I see it, it's just a blog someone created earlier this month. Right now, it fails . One mention at the end of a newspaper article (often where less important details are placed) doesn't quite cut it, and as above, the Alexa rank is weak. Perhaps later this will meet the inclusion guidelines, but it doesn't now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)