Deletion of Gravastar

Comment: Massively |notable concept, this should not be here at all. I also see https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Gravastar%22 book sources here. That the theory is discredited is entirely irrelevant when dealing with notability. I am absolutely baffled by Xxanthippe comment: 250 sources are a huge amount for notability, actually probably more than 90% of our topics, given that just ''two'' independent academic sources would be enough to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: 41 hits for articles (by a variety of authors) on Inspire that have "Gravastar" in the title, means that the topic meets the  easily. Whether the idea has been debunked or not is not relevant. (In fact, Hawking think that the idea was relevant enough to debunk only adds to its notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)