Deletion of First website ever made

Comment: because this discussion seems to have morphed into the merge/redirect discussion that should have taken place at Talk:History of the World Wide Web, or the merge/redirect should have been ly performed. My "speedy keep" opinion expressed above was not on the basis that I think this should be kept as a seperate article, which I don't because this is an encyclopedia rather than the ''Guinness Book of Records'', but simply that there was no need to go through the drama of an AfD discussion to achieve the obvious outcome. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: This article really seems to lack basic |''Wiki-Notability''. Although it is interesting, it would be better to merge it than the keep a permastub. Given the reasonable amount of sources, it would better to move it to info.cern.ch keeping this title as a redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:SIGCOV|Significant coverage found http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/worlds-first-website_n_1747476.html here, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2317212/First-web-page-built-Tim-Berners-Lee-goes-live--looks-like-Google.html here, and http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/30/tech/web/first-website-cern/index.html here (and I know #2 is the Daily Mail, but wouldn't it count for |notability purposes?). There is probably more out there as well and if some editor can find more then I'll be ready to remove the 'weak
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)