Deletion of STS Partners

Comment: Fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: The crux of the article rests in https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=98901344 one link. I note the validity of the corporation, but not crossing the  threshold. The other links are of modest or self-described . I agree that this may be 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:OR||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I'm seeing entirely  coverage for this fund.  They bought this other fund or security or they invested in that venture or they were a party in the other law suit.  None of it is especially significant, and what is significant is not independent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: while Wikipedia often has an anti-business bias, in this case there is just not enough non-routine coverage to fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails  / ; just an unremarkable firm going about its business. When one sees a section on "Awards and honors", it's tell-tale sign that the article has been created with promotional intent, and that's it's  for an encyclopedia entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP||WP:TOOSOON)