Deletion of Mark Nestmann

Comment: Fails  and agreed that writer seems to be related
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: no |reliable sources cited, and article's originator appears to be related to the subject in some way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This page makes me angry, for several reasons. Even if |everything stated as if true in the article, this person still |fails notability as we define it. In fact, by stating such things as he runs a "boutique" firm, he falls into the category of |run of the mill business person and lawyer, one of a crowd of millions. As an attorney, I've represented several famous people, including 1, a film producer who had his short at Cannes and also happens to be my domestic partner, 2, was ''pro bono'' counsel to several soon-to-be-notable musicians, 3, I am executor-attorney for the estate of the father of a very famous casting director who's worked with Jake Gyllenhall and Natalie Portman, 4, I was pen pals with Ralph Alpher, and 5. ''pro bono'' attorney for the "small estate" of a notable Hugh Carey-administration official who fell on hard times. ''None'' of that makes me ''notable''. Who |one represents or knows or is related to does not matter for notability. Unless a lawyer represents an extraordinary famous person, such as being counsel the President of the United States or an infamous criminal, they are just
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOTINHERITED)