Deletion of Jimmy McMillan

Comment: single issue candidate who did not get up on the day. Not |notable and clearly little from |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: Neither a "Major local political figure who receives significant press coverage" or a "Political figure holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office." He doesn't meet many, if any, of the alternative tests at . If I ran for mayor of Seattle on a "ban clothing/nudity for all" ticket, I would be crazy and probably receive some press. This would not, however, make me notable unless it was picked up nationally. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: failed political candidate... does not meet . Possibly deserves a footnote in the an article about the election itself. Certainly not a bio article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom.  per . He apparently did run for office to make a point about rent, but his notability does not seem to rise to the level of  for a living person. Also, one link is his own (which wouldn't count as source), one is a brief mention in a local web site of unknown (to me) popularity of his apparent candidacy, and two have no mention of him that I can see. Google comes up with http://www.vote.nyc.ny.us/pdf/documents/boe/2005generalelection/CandidacyList.pdf this (that I would add to push a Keep view) which seems to confirm that he actually registered but so did some other unknowns/non-notables so it would take more than that IMO to rise above the  barrier, like confirmation of notability in  or otherwise reliable proof of notable impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: as subject does not meet the  inclusion criteria.  Press coverage is to minor and running for mayor, even in NYC, does not qualify one under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)