Deletion of Space Penguins of Tuscumbia

Comment: sourcing inadequate.  Looks like a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: it doesn't even come close to meeting  since MUFON is a  publication
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Articles about cryptids such as Nessie, the yeti and bigfoot are about subjects that are dubious in many ways, but which have achieved wide coverage. These critters (that picture looks more like a meerkat than a penguin to me) have not achieved wide coverage. Especially not in reliable independent sources . The farmer may well have seen something. Unfortunately, there is only his word for it (and a researcher seeing a hole in the ground). Even this is not reported (so far as we are aware) in reliable sources. This is an encyclopaedia. Subjects must be reliably referenced. I don't think this can be referenced in any sort of source as only one person is reported to have seen the incident, and there is no evidence to support this - except the hole, and holes on farms are not unknown
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I can't find coverage in |sources that Wikipedia would deem reliable, so there's no way it meets |Wikipedia's standard for a subject having a stand-alone article. Its not "bias", it just flat out doesn't meet the requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Sources included are highly unreliable, and doesn't meet . Obscure UFO encounter claims don't merit a page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)