Deletion of Joseph Keating

Comment: As it stands the article gives no reason why the mayor is notable and so fails , as being the mayor of a small city is not itself notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There is no inherent notability in being the mayor of a small town of 8,000. Typically such an official will only have local news coverage and will fail . If he is inherently notable, then every mayor of any town of 8,000 or larger throughout history would have inherent notability, and I have seen no consensus for that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: individual is well below the standard for . For that matter, so are Lou Barletta and Thomas M. Leighton (even Wilkes-Barre is under 50,000). His predecessor Tom McGroarty is barely more than a stub. If there is a mayor of Nanticoke with a page (John Tool is the incumbent), I couldn't find it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Don't be so quick to have a go at someone else.  Certainly in the UK Pittston would be considered a small town based largely on it's size as we don't incorporate cities the same way as in the US.  I don't know if the proposer is based in the UK but don't be so quick to assume they are delibrately belittling either the ''city'' or its mayor. See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)