Deletion of Elle Jauffret

Comment: While Orangemike has a point, preserving an article just to prove a point is a bad policy.  The works mentioned do not apparently meet  (particularly the "non-trivia" part of the standard), so notability isn't really established
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NB)

Comment: It occurs to me that Ms. Jauffret may have (|I assume completely innocently) stumbled on a way for a non-notable person to circumvent .  1:Create an article about yourself (probably as an IP), 2: Ask on  for the article to be removed using a registered account with your name, 3: Wait for editors to defend you against .  Not saying that is what happened here, but as Green Cardamom shows, the only sources here are |trivial.  Is this a possible loophole in policy, I wonder
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:GNG||WP:BLPN||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:TRIVCOV)

Comment: subject doesn't like the article" is a form of , and even less valid as an argument for deletion. The subject is either notable or she isn't
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:IDONTLIKEIT)