Deletion of Svenne (2nd nomination)

Comment: Unreferenced. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: no valid reason for deletion has been given. It's not a dicdef. Saying it should be deleted because it's "just about a term" is like saying ''The Historian'' should be deleted because it's "just about a novel"; and saying it should be deleted because it's a ''foreign'' term flies in the face of , as well as raising the question of what "foreign" can possibly mean in an international encyclopedia. That it's orphaned and unreferenced is a problem, but not one that needs to be solved by deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)