Deletion of Johny Messo

Comment: I agree with buidhe here having reviewed the available sources. Currently, all four sources in the article are  either to an organisation he's involved with or to his own personal website, so it currently fails . The next question is can it be cleaned up to become notable, and I agree with the press conference/interviews as found above. That leaves us with the Dutch coverage, which translates to a five-part series on community members. That's probably , but considering there's nothing else, on its own, I don't think it establishes notability (as it appears to be less about him being notable, and more about him being profiled as a member of a community
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:PROMO||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: By my research passes the , if nothing else
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . While the plight of the Arameans is significant, I don't see how this advocate is notable. Few if any of the sources are secondary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)