Deletion of Prosimos

Comment: essentially per nom. May become notable in the future, but for the moment manifestly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Holy moley, this is one of the longest unreferenced articles I've ever seen.  Although there is one primary references http://www.prosimos.eu/PROSIMOS/ here, the nature of the content in the WP article seems to be largely unsubstantiated by the primary source.  As noted by the nominator, the article IMO is a case of .  Also, the creator's assertion that we should be waiting for years is clearly .  WP can wait ''without'' the article and see if it becomes notable, thank-you-very-much
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: This article appears to be packed with original descriptions  and synthesis . Also it seems to be full of material not clearly pertaining to the topic ''Prosimos''. And, again all this appears to be original material not derived from sources, but more likely from someone's self-knowledge. Furthermore, the creators/editors of this article have stated this will be signifigant in the future, but may not be considered signifigant now http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Crusio#Prosimos_Article. The website seems to indicate this is merely a proposal that could direct pertinent research efforts. This seems to contradict . Also this article is severly lacking in independent, reliable, third party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:CRYSTAL)