Deletion of Intersex rights in India

Comment: per  as well. Hijra (South Asia) is the main article that could be expanded, this article violates  because "content fork is the creation of multiple separate articles (or passages within articles) all treating the same subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:CFORK)

Comment: as . What content in the article is specific to "Intersex rights in India" but not Hijra (South Asia)|''Hijra
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: Comparing the article with Hijra (South Asia) and LGBT rights in India (especially the latter), as well as the sources provided by the other "delete" editors, make it clear, IMO, that this article violates . Since we already have an article that completely overlaps with this one, this article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: as duplicate article. (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: per nom and D4iNa4. Article fails all the points of , and instead of helping readers understand the topic, we are creating confusions. Ultimately a small new article that is  of  LGBT rights in India and Hijra (South Asia). Also agree that each of these latest article creations about "Intersex rights in country" are unwarranted and doesn't need separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:CFORK)