Deletion of Boondocks episode articles

Comment: I don't think these necessarily deserve deletion. The deserve to be written and sourced better; that's a distinction we draw here all the time. Deletion seems like the lazy solution to me (that's not directed at anyone in particular); we should be trying to fix the unsourced articles. See the section #Dealing_with_problem_articles|Dealing with Problem Articles in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE)

Comment: to List of The Boondocks episodes for being |non-notable, '''except keep''' Return of the King (The Boondocks), which seems to have created some controversy, '''and merge''' The Block Is Hot. '''Transwiki''' as an editorial option (also possible after the redirect). If someone is able to demonstrate reliable secondary sources for the many claims of trivia and allusions (I am completely unfamiliar with the show), I'd be happy tp reconsider. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per CasrAStone. Also, they should be taken on an individual basis. Some of these articles meet the criteria, some don't. Many of these articles can easily meet  if editors put some time into them.  is not policy but a guidleine that can be easily met with some work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:EPISODE)