Deletion of Bangladeshi Cyclists

Comment: The one article I found https://www.google.com/#q=%22Bangladeshi+Cyclists+With+Message+For+World+Peace%22 Bangladeshi Cyclists With Message For World Peace is from 2004 and is not about "the group initiated by Mozammel Haque with his few friends on May, 2011" as "Bangladeshi Cyclists". http://www.theindependentbd.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=160660%3Abdcyclists-introducing-night-rides-around-town&catid=182%3Acity-life&Itemid=220 This article, cited above, refers to "BDCyclists", so I think we may have an article name issue. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bangladeshi_Cyclists&diff=prev&oldid=577548347 This recent version of the article seems to use the source information in a promotional way or in a way to promote the groups activities. The editors of the article should review 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION)

Comment: The references present in the article are sufficient to demonstrate that  is met. (Came here from Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FBangladeshi_Cyclists|COIN
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: This topic passes Wikipedia's |General notability guideline. Source examples include, but are not limited to: http://www.thedailystar.net/beta2/news/learning-the-balancing-act/, http://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2013/jun/20/bike-blog-cycling-dhaka, http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/index.php?ref=MjBfMDdfMTRfMTNfMV85Ml8xNzYzNTg=, http://www.newagebd.com/detail.php?date=2013-06-29&nid=54945#.Uke1Wn9Gb0d. Also, s (e.g. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2013/jun/20/bike-blog-cycling-dhaka) are ''acceptable'' as news sources in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEWSBLOG)

Comment: There is evidence that the group has been written up in various articles in the national press, and that it passes . It may be that some of the claims made about the organisation are exaggerated, I am not in a position to say, but these are matters for normal editing if so. It is not a requirement that all references should be independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)