Deletion of Hellshock

Comment: The more that an article creator rants and raves, the less he/she takes time to listen to what's being said here. No matter how glowing a future this wrestler/accountant has, there is no evidence given of any present or past notability. Bear in mind that this is an encyclopaedia and not a soapbox for prophets of future glory. If the article is deleted, come back with the evidence. Take time to get it all together, or we'll be reviewing it at AfD again. May I suggest requesting deletion and starting again? But you must have the third party reliable sources to back up the article's claims. Don't put in things about the future.  will tell you why not. Also, articles about other wrestlers are not relevant here. If you think they shouldn't be there, tag them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Hellshock, a |conflict of interest doesn't mean a clash of personalities, it means writing about yourself or something you're closely associated with.  People generally have a tough time writing truly neutral, objective articles about themselves, not to mention press agents writing about their clients and so on.  Second, the question isn't whether independent wrestlers are "good enough" to be on Wikipedia—we have articles on not just Mother Teresa but Adolf Hitler too, and that doesn't imply a judgment about which is "good enough."  The issue is just |notability for inclusion in a general encyclopedia.  And unfortunately after looking for |sources I just don't see evidence that this article is going to meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:ENT)

Comment: I'm getting a strong whiff of  here and, in any case, the article cites no sources. This could be an article worth saving if these issues were addressed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)