Deletion of Harry Mondryk

Comment: Not worldwidely recognised. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: The issue isn't whether he has any talent nor whether people feel his media attention is deserved. The only question is whether he receives significant coverage from reliable third party sources. otability  Hello: http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/news/1719385.singing_brothers_notch_up_another_success/http://menmedia.co.uk/tv_and_showbiz/s/1003052_brothers_have_got_tv_talenthttp://menmedia.co.uk/prestwichadvertiser/news/s/1064549_harry_is_top_of_the_pops_this_timehttp://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/britain_got_talent/2956168/Warbling-Britains-Got-Talent-teen-in-fourth-audition.htmlhttp://www.prestwichandwhitefieldguide.co.uk/news/8220946.Brothers_set_for_Talent_tour/http://menmedia.co.uk/news/s/532143_young_harry_shows_that_hes_still_got_talenthttp://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2010/05/01/it-s-si-time-i-won-115875-22225186/http://www.burytimes.co.uk/news/8208638.Britain_s_Got_talent_brothers_return_home/  Under the guidelines subjects who receive significant press coverage are notable even when they receive the coverage as a result of failure, losing elections or declaring bankruptcy. Notability attaches solely as a result of the coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)