Deletion of Neeru Khosla

Comment: First and most importantly, Khosla has been the subject of many articles for her work on CK-12 and is a board member of many organizations including the Wikimedia Foundation which is a large and important organization. Although the articles about her may focus on her work, she falls clearly on the good side of the  and the fact that she is known for her work need not mean that she be merged into the article about her organization. The article does not do a good job of establishing notability but should fix the article, not delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)

Comment: subject has received |significant coverage from multiple non-primary or secondary reliable sources (http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_19794734 1), http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/print-edition/2014/03/28/the-reinvention-of-neeru-khosla.html, https://newlearningtimes.com/cms/article/35 3), therefore subject meets . If there are issues with the article, deletion shouldn't be the solution, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: There are sufficient sources to establish  notability and this doesn't appear to be a policy-based nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)