Deletion of Roy Moore sexual misconduct allegations

Comment: As a content fork, this |makes a lot of sense, just like with Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, etc. There is simply too much information here for it to be contained in the main article; it was taking up an inordinate amount of space, and splitting is how we deal with that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS|But I saw it on the news, so |it must be important! This can't possibly be described in Roy Moore|any other article in an encyclopedic way; we need every painstaking detail about these |living people because |a ton of newspapers wrote about the exact same thing and we need to be "journalists" like them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:BLP||WP:109PAPERS)