Deletion of Angelhack

Comment: This is an ambitious but very new undertaking (formed in 2011), and up to now it has not received the required |significant coverage from independent reliable sources. Everything I found at Google News http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=angelhack is minor or from unreliable sources. There is one significant piece cited in the article, from TechCrunch, but that's not enough for . Maybe this will get more notice later, but for now it is  for an article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:CORP||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: insufficient |significant coverage from multiple non-primary |reliable sources for the subject to be considered notable as defined by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG)