Deletion of List of persons who have won Academy, Golden Globe, Screen Actors Guild, and BAFTA Awards

Comment: it seems to be an okay |list and the criteria for inclusion is clear. People complaining about the list criteria are free to make their own lists. The list fulfills its purpose of information and navigation. I don't think this information could be obtained by using the http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php Category Intersect tool, since that only finds overlaps between two categories, I don't see any SAG categories, and many of the other award categories are very specific. Redundancy between lists and categories is beneficial. I don't think this falls under "Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations" from #DIR because these four awards are fairly significant in the film profession. It's certainly a big achievement to win all four of them. And this kind of information is perfect if Jimbo ever starts selling http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/technology/17wikipedia.html?pagewanted=all Wikipedia-brand trivia games
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:NOT)

Comment: per #DIR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: In the absence of a |reliable source ... (pauses to listen to crickets chirping)... stating that winning all four of these awards has some significance (e.g. calling them "the Big Four"), choosing to list the intersection of the four sets of award winners is a quite arbitrary decision, and I think it constitutes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: The synthesis argument is invalid, as any |bold editor could create articles with the combination of awards (i.e, List of persons who have won Academy and Golden Globe Awards).  That is an improvement argument, not a deletion argument.  However, the statement that it is the "big four" should be removed unless a citation can be found.  Again, though, that's an improvement argument, not a deletion argument.  AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: WP:IINFO|arbitrary |synthesis. Why not the César Award or the Edda Award for that matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)