Deletion of Disappearance of Susan Powell

Comment: There clearly are more than two sources of information here and original source material as well as secondary material from which an article can be written.  The "lasting notability" is due to the fact that this story doesn't seem to want to die and keeps getting reported, including some headlines just within the past week or so.  If there are notability requirements for something of this nature.... specify them.  Certainly this topic satisfies  and other general notability requirements and goes well beyond a normal obituary.  That the story may be somewhat local in scope does not disqualify it from notability standards.Also note:  The formatting of the article or the quality of the text has not merit at all in terms of establishing notability or why an article must be deleted or not.  Single sentence stubs can exist on Wikipedia that simply need the attention of somebody willing to expand those stubs.  Complaints about formatting is more the province of the  policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: per otability - the subject was object of '''significant coverage''', which as otability#General_notability_guideline states: "means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)