Deletion of Frank and Mary's Restaurant and Lounge

Comment: I've tried to help this user to understand |reliable sources and will take no !voting position here.  However, I think this article is on the borderline.  One problem is that there are no useful guidelines about the notability of individual restaurants, AFAIK; my instinct is to think that restaurants that have been in existence for quite a while are more possibly notable than others, and this one has been around for decades.  The |references provided might or might not bolster notability, depending on your attitude.  There are no notable chefs associated with this restaurant.  Do restaurant reviews count?  I suppose it depends on how well-known the reviewer is, and the notability of the publication, and I'm not able to assess the relative notability of what's provided since I am not familiar with the publications.  I have no idea how unusual/not unusual it is to have a catfish restaurant in the referenced area; in my area, it would be extraordinary and possibly notable (mainly because the catfish would have to be flown in from thousands of miles away).  It's not clear if this is a prominent example of a restaurant exemplifying a notable regional cuisine.  For all these grey areas, I'm willing to defer to someone with greater expertise, but I wanted to mention them to make sure this article received full consideration
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: Even in the limited abstracts that are shown in the linked references, you can see that this small restaurant in Indiana has been reviewed in the ''Baltimore Sun'' and the ''Chicago Sun-Times''.  This would seem to make it meet the |business notability guideline fairly handily.  A perfect illustration of why
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)