Deletion of Illdisposed

Comment: Eduardo Rivadavia of All Music Guide describes them as "one of Denmark's most respected and longest lasting death metal bands" http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:j9fqxqqhldfe~T1 here. That alone seems pretty notable to me. They have gotten plenty of coverage elsewhere, for instance http://www.lordsofmetal.nl/showreview.php?id=4628&lang=en here, http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=1&id=7991 here, http://www.chroniclesofchaos.com/reviews/albums/2-1801_illdisposed_retro.aspx here http://www.musik.terrorverlag.de/interviews.php?id=394& here and http://www.entertainmentdeath.com/interviews/illdisposed.php here. Easily qualifies per criteria 1 of : ''multiple non-trivial mention in independent publications''. They have also released two albums on Roadrunner Records which also means they qualify through criteria 5: ''two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)''. If an article does not assert notability, it should be tagged with {{tl|notability}} instead of being nominated for deletion. The two albums on Roadrunner seems to be a sufficient assertion of notability to me though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)