Deletion of Annular Theory (Vailan Theory)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)

Comment: This is a poor article on one aspect of Isaac Newton Vail's eccentric thinking. I've had a look and Vail is certainly notable, as a 19th century Catastrophism|catastrophist, with a reasonable number of |reliable sources such as https://www.jstor.org/stable/24144795?s Armstrong's 1988 'Evolution of Creationism' - yes, there's nutty physics, https://chem.tufts.edu/science/Geology/Wise/CreationistGeologyRefuted.htm nutty geology, and creationism all rolled into one sticky ball; Vail is a major figure within Pseudoscience. I've written a short article on Vail and suggest that we Redirect to there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)