Deletion of The Book of Aquarius

Comment: despite the comedy value of imagining internet nerds boiling their own pee for years on end, this pretty clearly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: Unfortunately I can't find any |reliable sources that indicate that the book meets Wikipedia:Notability (books).  The existing references are threads in forums, and online forums are usually not considered to be reliable, since they are |user generated (and to be honest, the references given don't exactly support the claim that it "sparked activity on many Internet forums").  I have tried to find other sources that do meet , but have failed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:USERGENERATED||WP:RS)

Comment: My first impression is this is all an elaborate hoax, but who knows. It's interesting, but unfortunately without the coverage in independent reliable sources, it fails  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: It's certainly not a "hoax," per se, because, well, there it is, right up there on the webpage.  I wouldn't say that WP:BK applies, simply because this isn't a book: it's web content which falls under .  The work, of course, fails all the criteria of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)