Deletion of Vladimir Fekula

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by  and .  Sources offered are trivial and useless.  I searched Google, looking for something better, but found nothing.  Additionally, the entire article is hagiographic, not 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:NPOV)

Comment: I came to the same conclusions as the Msnicki. COI, RS, and many BLP issues are in fact irrelevant to , but they do explain why the content exists at all. Before editing for BLP issues, I looked at the search links and got the impression the subject was very far from . I removed the worst BLP violations, namely unsupported claims about third parties and self-serving claims. Looking again without all the junk in the way, I still didn't see anything notable to hang  or other alternative criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)