Deletion of List of computer pranks

Comment: as glad as I am to have this complete list all in one place (and I was wondering whose face that was in the "Say it" prank, so it's Linda Blair), I must admit that it does appear to be a repository of links, and as has been said before, that's not what Wikipedia is for. However, there are many other such lists on Wikipedia of examples pertaining to a specific article, and I'm not sure how different from those this can be considered, even given that it's a bunch of links. This was first put on a separate page from the main article on "computer pranks" because the complete list was cluttering up the page too much, and by its very nature, a page such as this is fundamentally supposed to be a repository of links anyway. Oh, and I'm not sure how much good it would do to have a section describing why these are classified as pranks, given that the original parent article on computer pranks explains that already. Are we supposed to copy even more material from the parent article and paste it into here, just to keep this page from being classified as ? I'm not sure what the point of that would be. Of course, on the other side, what else would citations be for on this page? What exactly are we supposed to cite? I don't know if it should be deleted or if it just needs work, but I can't deny that it is a list of examples of something with it's own page, and that has been done before. For instance, if this page is deleted, then why not go back further delete the entire page on Internet Memes, and all the articles that it is parent too? Maybe I'm just not savvy enough to understand the difference, but I don't see how that page is much further away from  than this is. --Sylocat
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OR)

Comment: under  a link repository and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NFT)

Comment: just kidding'' '''Delete''' a random collection of useless (non) information. and possibly Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: Interesting to read, and useful as a counterpart to Computer prank. Whereas some readers may want to get a general overview from the main article, others are interested in delving deeper into these pranks, and will find a table-formatted list an excellent way to do so. I plead : this article serves a good purpose, and ''cannot possibly be created according to policy'' ( and ) since to my knowledge ''there are no secondary sources related to computer pranks''. In this case, the policies hinder us from developing an encyclopedia, so from a utilitarian point of view the maximally productive option is to ignore them. Here's a quote from an http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules&oldid=33578029 earlier version of  which I found helpful: "Ignoring all rules is about cutting through red tape to construct an encyclopedia. Remember, Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. Some actions may be reasonable, even if they might be against a strict interpretation of a certain rule
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:IAR)