Deletion of Food trends

Comment: I agree that this reads like a |personal essay. A quick browse of hits in Google News reveals a plethora of |reliably sourced articles about national food trends from cupcakes to sweet potatoes, as well as articles noting a number of yearly trends.http://www.lfpress.com/life/eat/2011/01/11/16846566.html 1http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/02/health/webmd/main3128918.shtml 2http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=-btNAAAAIBAJ&sjid=WIMDAAAAIBAJ&pg=7208,6203469&dq=food-trends&hl=en 3http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/01/08/columns-us-column-health-food-idUSTRE5074UA20090108 4 Perhaps the least |bitey solution is to userfy the article so the creator can work it into a more encyclopedic article in their sandbox with some help from friendly mentors. As it stands now, it should be removed from view as unencyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY||WP:RS||WP:BITE)

Comment: per .  This article seems to just be a personal essay composed entirely of Original Research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)