Deletion of OffTopic.com (3rd nomination)

Comment: If there are no independent |reliable sources then there is nothing |verifiable that we can put into an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: No sources? No article. Fails . (Alexa and BigBoard are not notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I withdrew the prod when I saw it had already been through AfD, but I sincerely don't see how this web site meets .  The only sources are verification of its traffic rankings... they're very nice, but I couldn't find anyone actually writing ''about'' this source, and how can we independently |verify the information in the article if no one is writing about it?  I am open to the possibility that |reliable sources exist that I didn't find, but they don't seem to have been presented in the earlier AfD, which seems to rely on Alexa ranking for its ''keep'' decision
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS)