Deletion of Tara C. Smith

Comment: Adding to the above observations that her publication record seems very typical of a junior prof (WoS citations 18, 4, 3, 1, ... h-index = 3), it would seem this is a pretty clear case of . Easy to hit lots of false-positives here for the much-more-cited researcher "Tyler C Smith", who may have been at the same institution at one time. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: This seems like a good example of an article created too early, as the subject is clearly on her way to reaching WP-notability. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under  at the moment. A search on GS suggests a total of 185 citations, and a relatively low h-index of 7.  Not yet passing  either. Her blog seems to be getting some attention, judging based on comments and links (http://scienceblogs.com/aetiology/), but not significantly above the thousands of health-related blogs out there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: She may not qualify under  or  but she clearly qualifies under . Her activities in the public sphere have garnered a lot of media attention.  I added a couple of references to the page from http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2007/08/21/HIV-denialists-spread-falsehoods-on-Net/UPI-95661187731311/ UPI and the http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/opinion/12kristof.html?_r=1 New York Times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails all relevant measures of notability, including  and . Writing a blog that was mentioned in another more famous blog is not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR)