Deletion of Andrew Lawton (2nd nomination)

Comment: Could not find coverage using the Tri-State (ND,MN,SD) library book/periodical system. Can not find any sources that meet the  guidelines nor the  guidelines. Where are the national news articles? Where is the non-local coverage by a reputable, peer-edited sources on this person?  The hero worship is getting a bit thick on Wikipedia lately
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Article violates . Being a blogger with mentions in a couple of news stories about specific incedental events does not provide enough notability to warrant an article. Also doesn't meet . Not a depth of coverage, and coverage that exists comes only from a local newspaper and a campus newspaper. Also, subject clearly does not meet ,  or . Won one category in a blogging award that itself did not receive any covereage and I don't believe that the award org is notable itself. Can't find any coverage in Google News for the last 4 years besides the two sources noted. Special:Contributions/67.193.129.239|67.193.129.239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:BIO||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:AUTHOR||WP:ENT)

Comment: could not find significant coverage by reliable sources. University paper not enough. Coverage by London Free Press (not including the 404 relating to a small rally) is about a child porn scandal, not Andrew Lawton, which makes it a case of  at most.--Special:Contributions/70.80.234.196|70.80.234.196
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Do you have any |reliable sources to back up your comments? If so, those sources would meet the |general notability guideline, but without sources nothing can be done, really
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)