Deletion of Mario Santana (academic)

Comment: The absence of  apart from the university is why this is not a notable subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: 12 years after this heavily-promotional bio was created by a single-purpose editor, https://rll.uchicago.edu/faculty/santana his faculty profile still lists him as an associate professor with one book. That's not success by academic standards. The book has four reviews on JSTOR https://www.jstor.org/stable/20119896 https://www.jstor.org/stable/4141189 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3738820 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41672923, enough to be plausibly notable itself but nothing special. So if there were an article on the book we could redirect to it. But even if another book with other reviews turns up (the only candidate I found is https://www.jstor.org/stable/41329293 and I'm pretty sure that's a different Mario Santana), giving enough for , the promotional and dated content of the current article makes it not worth saving
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)