Deletion of Young (MCC cricketer)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Meets  and in addition meets one of |our fundamental principles – "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." An inclusion in Arthur Haygarth|Haygarth's ''Scores & Biographies'', which is effectively a specialist encyclopedia should merit and inclusion in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORTS||WP:5P)

Comment: No, you "c'mon". This person played in a first-class cricket match and therefore meets  as a notable sportsman. As for your comment that he is "185 years old" what has that got to do with anything? We have at least one notable cricketer who was born in the 17th century. Cricket has been a professional team sport since the 1660s and the word "amateur" in cricket does not have its everyday meaning. The greatest player of all time, arguably, was officially an amateur. If you are going to make nominations, please check the project definition first and cut out the "clever" remarks which impress no one. What a waste of time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: losing battle on this one I'm afraid Kintetsubuffalo. Young played at the highest domestic level of cricket in England, passing ,  and by extension . Although thus far only his surname is known, that's not to say in the future more information won't be discovered. I've recently gone through the Marylebone Cricket Club category and found a few "A. Jones" who since their article was created more information, such as their full name and dates of birth have been discovered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN||WP:ATH||WP:GNG)