Deletion of August 2010 rocket attack on Eilat/Aqaba (2nd nomination)

Comment: now that there have been even more mention in news about these events. Very clearly important article that continues to be discussed in media long after they happened. Anyone who votes here saying it should delete based on  obviously is voting for some reason other than based on policy and did not properly look at article and realize it is several events that continue to gain in media attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per vent. This is a pretty open and shut case. The geographical scope of all the events includes Jordan and Israel; the most recent event includes Egypt and the Palestinian Authority as well. The most recent event had long-term effects on Egypt-Hamas relations, Jordan-Hamas relations, Palestinian Authority-Hamas relations, Egypt-Israel relations, the status of Eilat under the US State Department's travel warnings, and so on. All three events, both individually and collectively, have received broad coverage in mainstream sources and continue to do so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E)

Comment: or '''merge''' to relevant rocket attack article. This is now a collection of news, which still fails . Furthermore, I have to disagree with the interpretations of  above. The |tl;dr summary is that these events have no impact, as evidenced by the lack of sources discussing repercussions and further developments of any note. The point by point discussion is here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:TLDR)

Comment: Non notable article about a news event: 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: With the number of news sources cited from different countries, ongoing coverage over several months, and especially the piece in http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2009159,00.html time this is a clear keep per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTS)

Comment: The coverage is significant and ongoing, and the impact seems measurably large, so  seems to be satisfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)