Deletion of Little Fighter 2 (2nd nomination)

Comment: It seems as though it can not meet sourcing requirements per . However, mention can be given in the proposed merge article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I've looked through my stack of gaming magazines and the usual website sources, but cannot find any significant coverage per . Naturally, a mention on the ''Little Fighter Online'' article would be appropriate (which I'm glad to see now asserts notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: In my very humble (and occasionally incorrect) opinion, the biggest issue in most deletion debates of this nature is the article's notabilty. In this case the verifiability policy almost rules this article inadmissible. I don't mean to say that in any cruel way, but the |policy states that:''If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.'' This single third-party source does not establish notability. The article suggested for merging above, seems not to be about the same game - apparently, it's about a different game, with different styles. Adding any of the unsourced information in this article to that one would simply confuse the reader
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)