Deletion of Criticism of Apple Inc.

Comment: Neutrality isn't ground for deletion per . Criticism that is notable and well sourced but too large to fit in the Apple_Inc. article would seem to merit a fork. There is a very well written Criticism_of_Wal-Mart article and an entire :Category:Criticisms_of_companies|catagory that includes critiques of large corporations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: into Apple Inc. ''(or make major changes)'': Unless a Praise of Apple Inc. is created or this article is expanded to include positive criticisms this article is just encouraging non-neutral edits. At the moment it's just a list of criticisms that aren't written from |neutral point of view, almost an |attack page. I bet if this had been written as a praise article it would already have been speedily deleted under G11 as advertising. - w
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ATTACK)

Comment: After reviewing Wikipedia:Criticism|Criticism, Wikipedia:Criticism_sections_and_articles|Criticism sections and articles, , Wikipedia:Describing points of view|Describing points of view,  and  I reviewed how this dispute could be fairly characterized and came up with the following to recap my understanding of it. I've probably missed things, so please point them out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWNERSHIP||WP:NPOV)