Deletion of Quiqup

Comment: Have not seen the original, presumably much more promotional text, but as it stands, it definitely passes , with the Telegraph and MT articles, as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: There are two steps involved in examining sources against the criteria for establishing notability. The first step is to check that the individual sources meet the criteria for |reliable sources and there are a number of guides and essays that can assist with this. For many editors, they simply stop at this step - "Yup, reliable source, mentions topic - check, topic is notable". This is wrong. The second step is to ascertain whether the reference (published by the reliable source) meets the criteria for establishing notability. For organizations, (at least) two references that are "intellectually independent" from the topic need to meet criteria found at  and  in order for the topic to meet notability criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)