Deletion of Agent Strawberry Fields

Comment: to Quantum of Solace, and keep "Agent Strawberry Fields" as a redirect. I agree with Masem that "Strawberry Fields" is the more likely search term, but "Agent Strawberry Fields" is still possible, and it doesn't fall under any of the reasons at #DELETE
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: There are about seventy news articles that mention Agent Strawberry Fields. When Gemma Arterton, who played Bond girl MI6 Agent Strawberry Fields, is mentioned in a news story, they apparently throw a sentence or two in the story about Agent Strawberry Fields. Put all that independent, reliable source information on Agent Strawberry Fields together and I think you could have a nice, tight Wikipedia article on Agent Strawberry Fields. Right now, the article merely is some Wikipedian's thoughts on the topic. Nothing personal, but who cares what you think. Wikipedia doesn't. Per , Wikipedia merely is a reconveyer of what independent, reliable sources say about a topic. Until someone steps forward and writes an Agent Strawberry Fields using material only from independent, reliable sources, we should merge. Since the article doesn't appear to include anything from independent, reliable sources, it shouldn't be to hard for the closing admin to merge the little info in the article worth keeping
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: in the interest of consensus-building. Article lacks the sources and distinct information to support a stand-alone article, as per the . However, it can be covered in a broader context at the main article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)