Deletion of Glenn Laffel

Comment: Possibly meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Most widely cited pub, in JAMA, has 1,464 cites in GS; but he is one of many authors, right in the middle of the list. Two other pubs have more than 300 and 100 cites; he is first author in them. The h-index is a low 7, suggesting just a few hit wonders
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The article is a |BLP
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: He is the senior author or sole author on a lot of important papers at PubMed - some of them cited more than 100 times by others. His current position isn't one that would make him notable, but I think he qualifies under . He gets some hits at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Glenn+Laffel%22 Google News, but they are mostly quotes from him rather than stuff ABOUT him; this is not unusual for physicians and scientists, who almost never attract the kind of significant coverage normally required by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)