Deletion of Ramon Estevez

Comment: Notability is not |inherited.  Individual is non-notable outside of his familial connections.  Minor roles fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:ENT)

Comment: I don't think the roles this actor has had are sufficient to meet Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers, and I can't find sources sufficient to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets . Although it seems at first that there's an argument that notability is simply being presumed to be notable based on his relatives, it seems there's enough coverage independent of that relation to keep this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . His role in ''Cadence (film)'' gets significant press and was introduced with this http://articles.latimes.com/1991-03-16/entertainment/ca-23_1_ramon-estevez ''Ramon Estevez Also Follows in the Star Tracks of His Father'', Latimes.com link. Several other external links have been introduced to the article which should be looked at for |preserving versus deletion. More ghits have been generated for the subject by using his correct name, Ramón Estévez. The PDF link above my change of iVote demonstrates the subject has received substantial direct  and  sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:PRESERVE||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: and improve per sources through additional ''Find sources''. If his notabilty were dependent on his family, the nominator's concerns would be valid, but as he has independent notability and coverage, and a healthy body of work as an actor, he easily meets . And yes, just as with his siblings, there will be coverage of him in context to his familial relationships. HOWEVER... I can support a '''merge/redirect'''  to Martin Sheen as a last resort
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)