Deletion of Miss Washington's Outstanding Teen

Comment: I invite everyone to take another look at .  There's nothing there that requires a separate notability test when the thing being spun-out is a large list.  In cases such as we have here, the ''only'' question is whether the original list was getting too large.  And if it's too large, then  is all the justification that is needed for the sub-list.  If folks here really want the by-state pages deleted, then the only courses of action are to merge them back into Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants or to get that parent article deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: per . Could repeat the very sensible rationales of above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: an unremarkable state-level pageant;  does not apply as the subject is non-notable. Coverage is routine and / or hyper-local, not meeting , as in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:AUD)

Comment: I added a few additional sources to the article. It passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:SPINOUT of Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants which has become far too long.  Plenty of coverage in |reliable sources. Nominator is currently on a deletionist rampage related to this subject matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per .  If there is concern that the Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants article should not exist, then let that page be nominated for deletion.  But given that the article does exist, and given further that it reached a "keep" decision when nominated in 2015, it is now time to face the fact that it is becoming too large for a single article.  Spinning out separate articles for separate sub-topics is appropriate, and using "by state" as the criterion is a reasonable way to do it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)