Deletion of TimeSheet

Comment: The nominating editor needs to review the procedures under , primarily as it relates to #10 on the list. This was an inappropriate nomination. The better choice would have been to tag the article to alert the new editor to the need for references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Miami33139 managed to nominate the article for deletion http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TimeSheet&action=history '''''33 minutes''''' after user {{user|Onnop}}, a |new user, finished creating it (and ''less than an hour'' after Onnop started the article). That seems extremely premature to me.Lifehacker.com, a notable website, has published http://lifehacker.com/5521158/timesheet-automatically-tracks-your-time-spent-working an article about TimeSheet, which I think goes some way to establishing notability.The article does ''not'' read like advertisement: it briefly (too briefly!) describes the product, then explains its most notable feature: that it automagically decides which project a user is working on from the user's activity.Let's give the article at least a couple of months, then perhaps take another look at it. Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: strongly.  An entirely unreferenced article about some minor office software that apparently keeps track of the time during which documents are viewed.  Google News is not going to yield any relevant results as is, and adding the name of the publisher results in zero hits.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22TimeSheet%22+businessrunner+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a  |Promotional intent is obvious, both from the article itself and the tenor of some of the contents of this discussion.  There is no policy that requires the passage of time before an article can be nominated for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)