Deletion of Naresh Shenoy

Comment: Nothing claimed in the article as written constitutes a valid pass of either  or  — and per  an otherwise non-notable person does ''not'' clear the GNG bar for being ''alleged'' to have committed a crime. Wikipedia is one of the most widely read websites in the world, so an article can cause the subject ''harm'' if we're not hypervigilant about it — so one of the established rules flowing from that is that if a person wasn't already notable enough for an article ''independently'' of the crime allegation, and you thus have to rely on the crime coverage itself as the ''proof'' of notability per se, then we require a ''conviction'' and not a mere ''allegation'' for an article to become appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: the relevant policies and guidelines are ,  and . First, there is no evidence of a conviction: BLPCRIME says that we should not include it in an article for a relatively unknown figure, which this man is. Next, it is very possible that this case has just been dropped since there is no evidence of anything else taking place, which would fit more in lines with the first section of , which tells us to consider BLP1E. The alleged crime seems to be the only reason he would be notable, so BLP1E would normally have us not consider him notable. If he has been convicted, which I might add we don't have proof of, the second part of CRIME would apply. This man is not renowned or well known, so we can get rid of that prong. The second prong tells us to consider if this had a major impact: it was covered for six months in 2016, and there is no evidence of any coverage since. To me, it fails all the relevant policies and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:BLP1E)