Deletion of Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 11th Earl of Shaftesbury

Comment: likely to be notable per , although sources should be improved. (There is far too much on this page about the murder of the 10th Earl, which belongs elsewhere.) ''NB'' also the comment of Jimbo Wales at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gordon, 7th Marquess of Aberdeen and Temair and elsewhere: "There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub.  Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part of a wider series, is mistaken
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I think I'm coming down on the side of keeping articles on peers or their heirs, whether or not they sit in the House of Lords, as all their predecessors did (and therefore all meet ) and it would be slightly odd and not of value to the project to break the chain of Wikipedia articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)