Deletion of Hector Barbossa

Comment: Per above and {{User|WossOccurring}}.  I don't see how these are a problem ().  And WossOccurring, for responding to single keep !vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Norrington and Barbossa, and '''merge and redirect''' the rest into List of Pirates of the Carribean characters. There are several lists of non-notable-enough characters List of Saw characters|like this, and it is a valid middle ground. And before you tag me, I am aware that my comment may fail 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: Barbossa, there should be material in the 2000+ Google News hits to make a decent verifiable article.http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=barbossa+%22pirates+of+the+caribbean%22&cf=all e.g. these articles about Rush's role:http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2007May22/0,4675,FilmQampAGeoffreyRush,00.htmlhttp://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2007/05/25/2007-05-25_not_just_along_for_the_ride-1.htmlhttp://www.theage.com.au/news/film/rush-for-glory/2007/05/24/1179601532060.htmlhttp://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=10440005http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/20/1037697735292.html. As the nominator obviously didn't bother looking for sources for this one () I have no faith that they checked for sources for the others, so keep or merge the rest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The majority of the above !votes appear to be based around the fact that users |like the subject issue. Please remember to comply with Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions when airing your views
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)