Deletion of Tim Palmer (NZ)

Comment: Are there any people who want to keep that are not |Single Purpose Accounts? I mean, this is beginning to be almost too obvious
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: What the impassioned keep voters don't seem to realize is that their own observations are not sufficient sources for an article. (don't worry nobody else's are either) All content must be backed by |sources as required by the policy on |verifiability, and I don't see any sources forthcoming. If they were to show up, it also needs a re-naming as abbreviations should not be used in article titles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: If "furthering his case" is the main purpose of this article, then it should be deleted per . --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: Hey is there any sort of record for most |single purpose voters in one AfD, we may be in the running here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)