Deletion of Low poly

Comment: No reason to delete is provided.  The title is an abbreviation not a neologism.  The topic is obviously notable being discussed in detail in sources such as ''Game modeling using low polygon techniques''.  AFD is not cleanup - please see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: to polygonal mesh. Beyond the trivial definition, the article is almost entirely |original research and full of unencyclopedic trvialites. The sole source cited also defines high poly. Want an article on that? "High poly is awesome, almost like the real thing, blah, blah. But it's computationally expensive. Wow! Pixar does it using micropolygons. This justifies an article for the term high poly all by itself." There's no in-depth coverage of either of these topics, because they aren't really topics. There are perhaps two paragraphs that are worth keeping from this article, the vague definitions, and the one on normal and bump mapping. Everything else in this article is chaff
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)