Deletion of Alex Kade

Comment: There is no information to indicate subject is |notable. The first reference does not mention the subject's name, and even if it did it did, the fact that a company gives an "award" (probably in lieu of a bonus) is not notable. The second reference is a very minor document from the engineering section of a university, with a list of any graduates who have done anything at all of interest to fellow graduate engineers. Searching finds nothing notable for the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Clearly fails both  and the GNG.  Not even verifiable for the most part.  This kind of misinformation is harmful to the encyclopedia.  There is no consensus that a senior researcher at GM is notable, that is merely DGG's personal opinion and it is not backed up by anything credible in this instance. That an article is new does not mean that the subject is notable.  Let's deal with facts and reality and not wishy-washy I Like It or I Can't Really Tell arguments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)