Deletion of Cocktail hat

Comment: Meets the |notability guideline. Plenty of sources available http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Cocktail+hat%22&scoring=a&sa=N&start=0 here and http://books.google.com/books?lr=&as_brr=0&q=%22Cocktail+hat%22&btnG=Search+Books here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The article seems to satisfy , barely by the references given and yet more obviously from the added info that Uncle G provided. On the other hand, I completely agree that AfD is not the place to attack a nominator; focus on why the article should be kept in your argument, not what the nominator's motivations might be. I do see why NeutralHomer might have nominated this for AfD because the article contains very little content and isn't heavy on the sources. On the other hand, Mathsci's comment about the article being "nonsense" is completely unjustified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)