Deletion of Rosemary Corbin

Comment: Before yet another person points out how many Google hits this person has, they may want to re-read , particularly Wikipedia:PEOPLE#Invalid_criteria|'Invalid criteria' which specifically says
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PEOPLE)

Comment: I disagree that local papers are "not independent enough" to contribute to notability for a biography. says "'Independent of the subject' excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject or its creator. For example, self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, the subject's website, autobiographies, and press releases are not considered independent." Still I like to see more than local sources.  cites the essay Wikipedia:Independent sources which does not exclude local newspapers. If the subject were an organization, then  would apply and it does require more than local sources:"On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary." This is an inconsistency in our notability guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:ORG)

Comment: She fails to meet  and no evidence has been provided of any significant coverage. She is briefly mentioned in a news article and listed as a member of a board of directors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: nbsp; As per WP:N section , and unlike WP:V, it is not necessary that sources be cited in the article, it is only necessary that it be "likely" that they exist.&nbsp; In this case, the SFGate archive appears to start in 1996, and has http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/qws/ff/qr?sort=rank&o=10&term=%22Rosemary+Corbin%22&dmode=preset&period=all&Submit=S 80 references, but we can be entirely certain that in libraries around the Bay Area including the main library in San Francisco, there exist records of the Richmond mayor's election in 1993 that provide additional significant coverage.&nbsp; Topic easily passes WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN, and therefore WP:N.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE)

Comment: One of a series of cut-and-paste deletion nominations by this nominator. No indication that  has been followed in this case. I also find it offensive and contrary to policy that independent, published coverage in the local press is deemed not "independent enough." This is not NewYorkCitypedia or Londonpedia or Chicagopedia, this is Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)