Deletion of Stingray Sam

Comment: for failing . Apart from the points made here by Gnfnrf, there has been no official confirmation that it would be screened at 2009 Sundance festival. Attention from fans of producer/director's earlier works is not a reason to create a standalone article. ''Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|Leave
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: While this could potentially be added to either Cory McCabe's page, or the Billy Nayer Show page, for structural purposes I feel it stands better alone. Regarding  I would point out the last sentence in the first paragraph: failing to satisfy them is not a criterion for speedy deletion. Fans of both Cory McCabe and the Billy Nayer show tend to be rabid in a similarity to, for example, Apple fanatics. Crystal ball or no, even if this move is a flop, there is already and will be further interest in this film simply due to its cult nature.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: No evidence it passes any criterion of .  Newness is not a reason to keep; assuming the film will become notable is crystalballing. (Note that, according to , screening at Sundance would only make the film notable if it wins (and that's not even assured), or if multiple national film critics review it from screenings there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: obviously fails .  The article at present makes no apparent claims of notability at all, and there's no reason to believe this will be anything but a minor cult film, at best.  At worst, it will fail to see daylight '''just like the director's last effort'''.By the way, I'm another nearly random editor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DoctorWho42 canvassed by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)