Deletion of Stewart Rahr (2nd nomination)

Comment: Rahr clearly meets , having been the subject of several full writeups and significant mentions from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703957604575272833736032858.html ''The Wall Street Journal'', http://www.hauteliving.com/2009/08/rah-rah-rahr/ ''Haute Living'', http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2006/1127/152.html ''Forbes'' http://www.forbes.com/2005/01/07/cx_sc_0107movers.html, and ''The New York Times''—http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/31/nyregion/31mansion.html http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/27/business/worldbusiness/27iht-pharma.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/26/business/26rahr.html?pagewanted=all http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/11/19/stewart-rahrs-second-act
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: easily passes , as shown by the sources in the article and linked above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Whatever the history of the article, it's not spammy now and he is clearly a notable person.  This was kept just 6 months ago and nothing has changed the correctness of that result.  |Notability is not temporary and he is still one of the world's richest men.http://www.forbes.com/profile/stewart-rahr  628 hits at GNewshttp://www.google.com/search?q=stewart+rahr&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=hiWbTevAKY30tgOGh5mRBA&start=0&sa=N including some very recent oneshttp://www.google.com/search?q=stewart+rahr&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=qdr:m&tbm=nws&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=jCWbTfSQJ4_WtQPQ6oSVBA&ved=0CBUQpwUoBA
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)