Deletion of Frank Finnerty

Comment: The additions to the page are still local positions that do not meet . A ''county'' officeholder does not meet the standards for political office, and there has still not been any assertions of notability beyond the local offices or 'significant press coverage' that would rise to the standards set forth in . The keep arguments are for the timing of the renomination. The article still fails to meet Wikipedia standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: I had stepped away from my computer for lunch only to see that during my brief break, the article had reached a no consensus for an AfD, and that it was being resubmitted for deletion, all within a span of 46 minutes. While I will do my best to |assume good faith, it is very hard to accept that this is not just another attempt to undo an AfD that just failed. As with the Sue Schilling AfD, can I politely suggest that as a genuine show of good faith this AfD be withdrawn and that a period of time &mdash; say several weeks or a few months &mdash; be allowed after the rejected AfD to allow the article sufficient time to be improved to allow the article to better meet the  concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BIO)