Deletion of George Ledin

Comment: per  as described by Eppstein above. This is a great example of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)

Comment: If he passes , it could only be for #C7, impact outside academia. But I think there is significant impact inside and outside academia for his malware teaching; I added four more sources, two of them significantly before the ''Newsweek'' piece and two significantly after (including one academic study of his teaching by someone else) that I think show this aspect of his work is not just a flash in the pan and to provide enough depth of sourcing for . (Not added: many more stories that merely quote the Newsweek piece without adding much of their own original reporting.) He was also the author of multiple computer science books in the 1970s and early 1980s; it's hard to find review sources from that time because many of them would have been print instead of online, but I found two reviews (one of them short) of one of his books, a multi-book review including another, and a brief paragraph (maybe a publisher description rather than a review) of a third. It's a borderline case for  but on top of the malware material I think it's enough to save this from BIO1E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)