Deletion of Local maximum intensity projection

Comment: nbsp; #2 Disparaging nomination.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: Per  2e "''nominations which are so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question''".  This is because the nomination says that no sources were found when the article already contains a source.  That paper by Sato et al is cited in numerous books as you can readily see by checking the link above.  The nominator seems to have made this nomination as part of a spree in which the facts of each case are not being checked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)