Deletion of Untitled Zelda Project

Comment: without prejudice, fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I'd say merge, but there's nothing here that isn't in the series article already except the IGN speculation, which is interesting to my inner Zelda fanboy but ultimately runs afoul of , even if it is from a RS. It's a tough call, because 1) this is probably as close to a sure thing as you can get in video games and 2) (caution: |OR) if it does get canceled, the series is high-profile enough that the cancellation would probably be notable a la Star Fox 2 or Super Mario 128. At this point, though, all we can say about the game is that Miyamoto confirmed the project's existence, it's being developed for the Wii, and it's targeted for 2010, and that's not enough to justify a separate article. No objection to recreation when more details are available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SPECULATION||WP:OR)

Comment: edit conflict) This has already been mentioned in the The Legend of Zelda (series)#Games|''Zelda'' series article, so merging or redirection would not make sense. Otherwise, unlike the other games announced at E3, all the sources tell us is that Nintendo is making another Zelda game and that Shigeru Miyamoto has confirmed it. The rest of the content presented is only speculative or is based on Miyamoto's speculations about the direction of the game. |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Once more information comes, such as a name, a more definite release date, and more concrete non-speculative details about the game, then it could be spun out of the Zelda series article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Ive had this discussion under the exact same circumstances regarding Dragon Quest X initially i felt a merge into the main series article was appropriate but concensus pointed out to me that the article would be re created anyway if it were deleted shortly. The main fact of not deleting this article is that the game is confirmed and even though no additional details exist beyond that it 'exists' is seemingly enough for the internet to establish its notability. Secondary sources pick these up like crazy establishing notability basically because the topic is sought out information and popular. Which is why the page is likely to be re created anyway if it were to be deleted. Additionally Movies that are not in principal photography () generally warrent deletion based on simplified wiki guidlines, however; a more popular movie will again establish notability with secondary sources. I think unless this movie guidline spreads to video games as well theres no justification to delete the article. If I am missing anything crucial here like a policy im unaware of please inform me, thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)