Deletion of Gurmehar Kaur

Comment: per . This article was created for political propaganda of '''Indian''' politics. Delete according to  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROPAGANDA||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is a good case of . A review of the sources shows that the coverage is related to one event. Note that whether a person is known for one event is generally determined by whether {{tq|significant coverage may focus on a single event involving that person.}}. In this case, it is abundantly clear that the significant coverage is focused on the event. (The coverage prior to this news spike is minimal. In addition, some of prior coverage is http://www.thebetterindia.com/54116/gurmehar-kaur-war-religious-hate-peace-video/ thebetterindia.com and http://www.newscrunch.in/2016/05/daughter-of-kargil-martyr-gurmehar-kaur.html newscrunch.in which are not reliable sources for the purpose of notability). Our  requirements exist precisely so that we don't create  biographies on people. This unfortunately is one of the cases. I also agree with the explanation by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:PSEUDO)

Comment: Article is much more developed than it was over the time. Yes, it does needs improvements. If you go through several media reports and consider them as a reliable source she does comes under . Thank You
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per  and . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: single events dont pass . Though she may have participated in other anti war campaigns, those seem to have remained confined to her facebook wall and dont have any coverage in reliable media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Coverage goes beyond one event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . I haven't looked at the sources, and have no opinion on her political position. But, the article itself makes it clear that she is only known for one event. Being known for one event only passes  if the event itself is exceptional. This one is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  - I see plenty of sources added showing ongoing coverage for controvers''ies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: This article violets policy  related to article creation for biography notable only for single event. She is just a media sensation for now a days and she is not linked with any notable event that should be featured for article creation. The whole event might be created under the section of ''"2017 controversies in India" or "2017 Protest in India"'' as it was in 2016 JNU sedition controversy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS|Wikipedia is not a news-site.And a case of ---putting out a viral video;trolled by some notable people and persons of prominence choosing sides-- hardly makes one notable.In the last year or so, India has seen a rise in student and intellectual activism.And with the accompanying hot-headedness of the political leaders and the very controversial nature of the topic under discussion--- these frequently snowballs into the national headlines--albeit ''temporally''.But a fortnight or so after, these people magically vanish from any  coverage.And yeah, I don't buy, she was notable prior to the video surfaced out.As to some of the opposes, I fail to see any policy-based argument countering the issues raised specifically by the nom and {{U|GSS-1987
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:RS)

Comment: In the worse case it's  and in the best case it's . Heavy coverage, but all related to just one event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: WP:BLP1E violation. esp. media units cover numerous incidents in detailed manner.Hardly, all make way to WP!!Already the coverage in print media is spiking down.The main problem is nothing exists about her in media except about the video about a tender issue and the subsequent trolling which as a matter of fact is a common incident in today's India.Special:Contributions/202.142.107.74|202.142.107.74
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)