Deletion of The Hoodoo Voodoo Dolls

Comment: because it fails . It's not an issue of inadequate verifiable sources, it is more the fact they would not exist at all because this is a small obscure band that hasn't made it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: for not having adequate |verifiable sources to establish |notability.  As the sole verifiable indicator of notability, "Delusions Of Adequacy.net" isn't good enough.  Testimony about how good or important something is will rarely sway opinion in an AFD debate.  Here is the place to discuss the article and relevant guidelines - the article is the place to show notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: as NN failure of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:BAND)

Comment: I wouldn't even class DOA as a single source who has written about the band.  "Send us your CD/single/MP3 and we'll review it" sites are astonishingly common. Footnote 1 of  and  states "The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the subject itself have actually considered the musician, ensemble, composer, or lyricist notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it." In my opinion review sites such as these do not meet this standard, they are not writing about the band as such, just the music they have been sent to review
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:BAND)

Comment: One review on a site of questionable notability itself does not equal notability. The guideline is "'''multiple''' non-trivial written publications". Also, T3hllama, these are not supposed to be "votes", this is a discussion. The standard format is that you place your opinion (whatever it may be, keep, delete, neutral, etc.) in bold and then explain it. You should read about the |articles for deletion process
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: per . This isn't a debate about DOA, but about whether this article should be deleted. Re previous comment, I wouldn't list "major label signing" as a criteria though, as numerous bands have become extremely notable without one (John Butler Trio comes to mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)