Deletion of Movement to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination)

Comment: Clearly this article will be kept, but I find it pretty disturbing.  It smells like a  fork|POV fork.  Even a well-sourced repository of complaints about Bush is...a repository of complaints about Bush.  The "impeachment resolutions" are presented as much more high-profile than they really are.  The vast majority of even the most liberal groups don't advocate anything of the sort.  Things like "The ImpeachBush.org website claims to have collected over 736,000 signatures (as of September 25, 2006) on a petition to impeach Bush. None are known to have been created to oppose it" feel like Wikipedia:Weasel words|weasel words -- could the reason be, perhaps, that this movement is so low-profile that no one would bother to oppose it?  I don't see any petitions opposing the movement for the violent overthrow of the US government either -- is this evidence for the movement's success?  Of course not.  The "rationales for impeachment" section is no better -- this title really just seems to be an excuse to make the article Why Bush sucks and not have it deleted.  I am by no means a fan of Bush, but I am not a fan of weaseling POV into Wikipedia either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: It's an awful article that pretty much reads like a hypothetical Articles of Impeachment itself, but the subject matter meets . (And yes, I !vote this way knowing that my "keep" vote will be counted as a keep and not one iota of "cleanup" will actually take place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)