Deletion of Naomi Duncan

Comment: As I said in my comment just above, none of the subjects appear to meet .  Coverage is what you'd expect and is focused on being members of the Youth Olympic team.  Like previous editors, I agree you may well be able to put together an article on the team, but individual articles are 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I am undecided on Young as there are a couple sources on her, but they don't go into much depth and they are local in nature leading to a possible  situation and those kinds of sources are specifically mentioned by  as not meeting the requirement. The others however, I couldn't find any coverage that meets . YOUNGATH says nothing about Youth Olympics athletes being notable, YOUNGATH is more about when an athlete is not notable than it does for when an athlete is notable. I also suspect Youth Olympics coverage may vary widely by country, I don't think the average person in my country would even know they existed let alone the athletes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:YOUNGATH||WP:GNG)

Comment: I didn't do any searching of my own, but I did look at all of the references in all of the articles included in this AfD.  They all look like , and thus fail .  I wouldn't object to a redirect or merge somewhere, if there was an appropriate target, but I don't see one; the suggestion above, i.e. Australia women's national field hockey team seems like way to broad a topic.  Redirecting there would leave the reader wondering why, since they're not mentioned there, and a merge would be 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: I don't see them meeting any notability guidelines or . Any coverage is local and routine. A suitable merge would be fine, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subjects do not meet  and they are 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: While they fail , they ''may'' pass WP:GNG. For Naomi Duncan, I found https://thewomensgame.com/news/loving-hockey-512679 this and https://www.theleader.com.au/story/5659528/shire-girls-to-make-hockey-history-at-youth-olympic-games/ this straight away, but would need more work to pass GNG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)

Comment: the Youth Olympics are https://www.olympic.org/youth-olympic-games notable per ,  as national field hockey champions, representatives of Australia in international field hockey competition in South Africa, and per otability (sports) as https://www.theleader.com.au/story/5659528/shire-girls-to-make-hockey-history-at-youth-olympic-games/ the first Australian Women's Field Hockey team to participate in the 2018 Youth Olympic Games.  medal winners Olympic level qualifiers are customarily covered substantially in independent sources prior to (national/international competition & various qualifying games) and after the Youth Olympics.  I don’t think we should restrict a national/international athlete’s notability based on age when other notability criteria has been met. For example, Grace Young (field hockey) was covered in independent RS because she excelled on a national level and qualified to tour internationally. Youths of that caliber are typically competing long term and receive long term media coverage.  I’m also not seeing anything in our PAGs that would justify exclusion based on age
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:YOUNGATH||WP:GNG||WP:N)