Deletion of Wilbur Ernesto Martinez-Guzman

Comment: WP:OSE is  not justification for a page existing. Are there other pages that violate ? Yes. Should we keep this one? No
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: per |G10. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G10)

Comment: as a clear case of  combined with  which should be enough to show this article's existence is unacceptable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME||WP:RECENT)

Comment: Notwithstanding your novel reading of  the requirements of  definitely take precedence in a BLP article that is ''not about a crime but rather about a suspect of a crime
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: After the rename the main problem has been solved. Meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Creator seems to be an  account trying to create a series of articles about immigrants involved in crimes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: as a rather egregious violation of  and . Being subject to racist screeds by Donald Trump after being suspected of a crime does not make a person independently notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:BLPCRIME and even if he were convicted . Something should really be done about the users who routinely violate policy to create such articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Would this be here if Trump hadn’t made something of it; and would he have made something of it if the suspect hadn’t been Hispanic? That is, will WP end up adding crimes because the suspected criminals are Hispanic? 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: but refocus the article on the event and not the perpetrator, as it is the event, not the perpetrator, that has received the majority of the |significant coverage.  Accordingly, also move to 2019 Nevada killing spree
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Someone renamed the article 2019 Nevada killing spree.  Its about the crime, which is clearly notable, not just the person.  Ample media attention to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or '''MOVE''' (revised iVote, see below) per , .  The names of suspects in major, highly publicized crimes are not protected by BLP1E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Clearly meets . That he hasn't been convicted is irrelevant if he has a large amount of coverage in reliable sources, which he has. President Trump's comments on him only increase his notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly meets  indeed.  Per coverage, per reliable sources. Trumps comments also goes for notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: does not meet , please  vio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:BLP)