Deletion of Cicada 3301

Comment: Not enough coverage per , one source in mental_floss and one source in Latin America is insufficient to show that this is notable. We can't even say what it is, other than a puzzle that appeared anon on the Internet. The claim that it has "entered internet pop culture" is not verifiable in reliable sources. Further the SPA's in this AfD are talking-up Cicada 3301 too much for comfort, such as claiming there are "print newspaper" sources but not providing those sources, getting overly defensive when I played devil's advocate that it might be a 4chan troll. At best the whole thing would have to be re-written as being a "series of clues posted to the internet by an anonymous entity (person or persons)" (''not'' an organization, since there is no evidence for it). And it would be mostly based on just one source. Wait for more sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: mental_floss is an entertainment web site with no pretension to be a reliable source, and the coverage in ''Andes Online'' is just a brief news report. |We don't have articles about everything that gets mentioned in the news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)