Deletion of Singapore gay films (2nd nomination)

Comment: the individual films are notable - per  and cleanup the cites to footnotes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: The notability of the individual films is not the issue here; it is the notability of "gay cinema" in general within the Singaporean film industry that is in question. I'm not sure what you think will be achieved by "cleaning up the cites", either. A bunch of IMDb profiles have no real value as references whichever way you look at it. And exactly which part of  are you citing? Lists are still subject to notability criteria, and listing any films that are a) loosely connected to Singapore, and b) have some vague LGBT-related element to them, is completely indiscriminate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: The references are links to Imdb, lazily cited (without proper citations), and without any evidence that this isn't just |original research. The article clearly grasps for straws to establish notability with the sub-sections "films with LGBT sub-plots" and "films with cross-dressing actors." The main section only mentions a few films. Is that supposed to be an "explosion"? Zen|&#9775;&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)