Deletion of Easy Computer Sync

Comment: per  and . As for User
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: While socking and a COI are not reasons to delete an article (unless they are paired with a G11 qualification), failing  is.  The references in the article are either not independent or not significant coverage of the subject (or both).  A https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Easy+Computer+Sync%22&hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=qsf1UIOVHYGY2AWEm4HICQ&ved=0CAwQ_AUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41018144,d.aWc&fp=d5d38806f452c552&ion=1&biw=1270&bih=716 Google News search provides no independent and significant coverage from reliable sources that can be used to establish notability and either does a https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Easy+Computer+Sync%22&hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&biw=1270&bih=716&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=r8f1UJfOKsjE2QX-7oFI&ved=0CB8QpwUoBQ Google Nws Archive search.  I should not though, that the archive search does produce one press release (not independent) and http://www.slashgear.com/new-software-makes-synchronizing-your-netbook-with-your-desktop-a-snap-2053048/ one article from a tech blog that I wouldn't necessarily consider significant coverage.  Even if it did, one article will not satisfy   especially since it's about three and a half years old and apparently the only time the product was ever written about.  If the subject were notable, you would think it would have gained more than one small piece of coverage over that period of time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)