Deletion of List of terms in Xenosaga

Comment: per #IINFO. How is this 'list of video game terms' not a video game guide? It is completely in-(Xenosaga)universe POV (Wikipedia is supposed to have a reality POV). Willing to reconsider if a secondary source establishing notability of terms with out-of-universe writing can be presented
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Let me just run down a few things.  First off, the reliable sources: '''the game is a reliable source.'''  More specifically, it's the '''primary source''', and as such is perfectly suitable for matters of  and , but ''not'' .  Instead, notability is in this case asserted by the "parent" article which the list was (presumably) split off from: Xenosaga.  From : "''Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be merged with short descriptions into a "List of characters." This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, '''unless it becomes long, in which case a separate article for the list is good practice'''.'' (emphasis mine)  The rest of the nominator's objections warrant a cleanup, not a deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:FICT)

Comment: as per . Gameguide/cruft. Everything is written from an in-universe perspective with no attempt at real world context or relevance (I mean the article has stuff like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)