Deletion of Alexander Schott

Comment: He's had some mention in several significant historical accounts, and all of the refs are good reliable sources. While I'm not expecting |WAX to make a good deletion argument, my opinion is that he's at least far more notable than, say, Paris Hilton
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)

Comment: per  and merge any relevant material. Article does not sufficiently meet notability guidelines for inclusion. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: or '''smerge'''. Even on the assumption that getting the first service number is somehow notable, this is, at best, . Indeed, there is no reason to believe that the mentions in the "military history textbooks", if they exist, are anything more than trivial. Service record copies obviously cannot establish notability, otherwise every single serviceman would be notable. (also posted, ''mutatis mutandis'', on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Ackerman (USMC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Delete'''. Insufficient references to meet |notability, as none of them appear to be indepth enough to warrant notability with so few references.  Furthermore, unless the individual was awarded any notable awards (thus he'd be covered under ), he falls under , therefore pertinent information should be merged into the article Service number (United States Marine Corps), and the rest should be deleted and replaced with a redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BIO1E)