Deletion of LiteSpeed Web Server

Comment: fails  and , as nothing indicates why the "4th most popular web server available today" is markedly different from any other web server. Also contains language that violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT||WP:MILL||WP:PROMO)

Comment: I have changed my mind, since I believe the works cited by {{user|Dmitri tikhonov}} hold up and I have added them to the article. The fact that academics are referring to the software, and that it is mentioned in major books (e.g. those published by O'Reilly) about server administration, means it passes . It definitely requires further editing to remove  language, and could be shortened since some information relies too heavily on dubious sources, but the core of the article is fine, given these new sources, in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:PROMO)

Comment: an unremarkable software product; sources fail  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP)

Comment: at least one editor has indicated above that independent sources support notability. The developer above must be careful to comply with , but if others are willing to verify these sources and use them to clean up the article, then I'd support keeping it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Hello, my name is Dmitri Tikhonov -- I am a programmer employed by LiteSpeed Technologies, the maker of the LiteSpeed Web Server.  Obviously, I would like to see to it that this page not be deleted.  In reply to the original criticism, the 2.9% figure comes from https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/web_server/all W3Techs, which is used as  in many Wikipedia articles.  The position that W3Tech statistics are fudged has to be proved.  Other than W3Techs, LiteSpeed Web Server is mentioned in NetCraft web server surveys from https://news.netcraft.com/archives/2017/02/27/february-2017-web-server-survey.html February and https://news.netcraft.com/archives/2017/05/25/may-2017-web-server-survey.html May of this year.  Would you call NetCraft numbers biased?  In regards to LiteSpeed Web Server usage: yes, we proudly serve the needs of our customers -- large, commercial web hosting providers.  It does not make our software product less legitimate than Apache, Nginx, or IIS.  I would like to be given an opportunity to improve this Wikipedia page to adhere to standards so that it is not deleted.  I can look for, and include in the page, more -- or different --  if that is what it takes.  LiteSpeed Web Server is the fruit of many years of labor, of ingenuity and sweat of hardworking people.  Please be fair to them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)