Deletion of Protonism

Comment: I agree this  and  concept fails under ; that's not to say ''other'' fringe theories don't have their place. This one just isn't notable in any way. Here, I agree with Collect and Drmies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NEO||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and .  I found ZERO Google scholar or Gnews links.  The only book references I found relate to protons in physics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Definately  and  and concept fails ; its not notable in any way. Google News search gives zero hits for "Protonism" or "Gjeke Marinaj" Here, I agree with Collect, Drmies, JFHJr and others. Special:Contributions/87.236.90.41|87.236.90.41
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NEO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Vehicle for the promotion of Gjekë Marinaj.  Assuming that he himself meets notability standards (I'm uncertain, but a cursory examination suggests maybe so about which I am increasingly doubtful), any discussion of his work belongs in ''his'' article -- although I'd stress that such a discussion should |by no means be this lengthy; I think a claim could be made that this protonism article is |unambiguous promotion (which need not be commercial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:CSD)