Deletion of Zulu Wikipedia

Comment: No secondary sources to demonstrate notability.  does not work in reverse; the essay linked to is about how large numbers don't automatically make something notable. A website with small numbers probably isn't notable. Sources are what makes an article notable, and this article only has some statistics. There is a consensus that notability isn't simply "inherited" (see Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:compromise), there must be sources. gnore all rules|Ignore all rules is a dangerous gambit. You are in effect saying "I know this article doesn't follow policy, but this article is a special case." You have not demonstrated ''how'' this article is a special case. You would have a much better chance to save this article if you find sources and use them to improve the article, and not have to fall back to AR. Until then, I have to vote delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:BIG||WP:I||WP:IAR)

Comment: I don't deal with website articles, so I'll not "vote".  Two comments, though: (1) An AFD some weeks ago resulted in the deletion of at least one, likely more, article(s) on certain language editions of Wikipedia; I can't give you the link, but I can assure you that the idea of deleting an article on an edition of Wikipedia has at least some recent precedent; and (2) notability guidelines are specifically made to guide us in deletion or keeping, not in showing what usually happens.  Showing what usually happens is the job of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Because it fails  and just because it is associated with Wikipedia is no excuse for overriding a well defined policy. Also, has anyone considered redirecting to List of Wikipedias? For some reason I find that more appropriate. ''Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|Leave
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Why is notability inherited in this case when one of our guiding principles is that notability is ''not'' inherited? This needs to pass  and I see no evidence that it does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Mostly per Pharmboy. I don't think it fails  as, IMO, it passes criterion 3, "The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators." Wikipedia itself passes this IMO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)