Deletion of Vajrapran

Comment: Source 1, 2, 4 are circular. Source 3 is used to cite who invented it, (but not what it is or why it's important). Source 5 (6 is the same) https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://satyaponbd.com/vajrapran/ roughly translates to an advertisement, not reliable. Source 7 cites an advertisement: ''one can easily take care of their mind''. Source 8 (11 is the same) is short and says almost nothing about the article subject, just mentioning it once. Source 9 has no mention of the subject. Source 10 has the same idea as 8. ''There is nothing to indicate importance, and the citations are not  or relevant.'' If the uncited content is removed, it either reads like an advertisement, or you are left with a blank page, depending on how much you remove
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)