Deletion of Natalya Rudakova (3rd nomination)

Comment: as per Jennavecia. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: and tag with '''Merge''' to Transporter 3.  The fact that this was put up a 3rd time to make a point (or for whatever reason) aside.  It's been refused deletion twice at AfD.  If an actress makes it to the top of her profession, and actually gets to "play in the game" as it were - that is notable.   Transporter 3 has made over 30 Million dollars, it's not a home made web-episode.  As far as the WP:ENT argument?  I see it as a case of the guideline failing the article rather than the article failing the guideline.  OTHERSTUFFEXISTS?  That essay?  Nicely written essay, but still a one sided essay.  OTHERSTUFFEXISTS fails in the sense that we strive for consistency across the 'pedia.  I also remember the phrase "|preserve information" from our |Editing '''policy'''.  Now, that said, I can't find enough information at this time to build much more than a start-class article.  C-class at best.  The  sources aren't the best, but they exist.  Better to merge with Transporter 3, preserve the information, (and redirect "Natalya Rudakova"),  then if Rudakova continues with her career it can be spun out at a later date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:EP||WP:RS)

Comment: Repeated |bad faith nominations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: I really don't see why the nominator is so hell-bent on trying to get rid of her article... Although she doesn't really meet , in which would lead to redirecting her article. I think this could also be kept because it has proper referencing. As a side note, I'm catching vibes from the nominator that leads me to believe that some editors think this article is on a |deadline with phrases like "It has been longer than six months..." and "She has dropped off of the media's radar...". Please remember that |notability is not temporary and there is no set time that this article has to be perfect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:DEADLINE||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: to Transporter 3; lead in major movie but falls short of . Why would you nominate this for deletion rather than trying redirecting it? Surely deletion can't be preferable to a rd for the lead actress from a major theatrical release
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)