Deletion of Fastly

Comment: Note: I have COI disclosed Talk:Fastly#WP:PAID Disclosure|here. The page was reviewed through the  process and approved by an unbiased third party.  only discourages the use of TechCrunch and similar sources when the article is written by a "non-staff 'contributor'", and that is specifically to weed out paid contributions. Discussions on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard point to this as well, and suggest that the portion of the content from these sites from non-biased sources can be considered reliable. Furthermore, TechCrunch is a major industry publication, and simple common sense precludes a wholesale disregard of it as a source. Computerworld is a 50-year-old tech magazine and the source is reliable per . Both TechCrunch and Computerworld have editorial oversight. While some of the sources may be regurgitating press releases, others represent a depth of coverage that extends beyond churnalism, and are enough to establish the notability of a company that https://www.bizety.com/2018/01/17/5539/ serves over 10% of all requests on the Internet. The company's last funding round was also covered by the https://www.wsj.com/articles/fastly-raises-50-million-for-content-delivery-1495539001 Wall Street Journal, but I chose not to use that reference because the information was adequately covered in non-paywalled sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC||WP:NCORP||WP:NEWSBLOG)