Deletion of April O'Neil (actress) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per above and , that {{tq|If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability}}.  Subject gets plenty of non-trivial mentions in good quality RS per the article (like ''https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-lists/geek-love-30-nerd-sex-symbols-14522/april-oneil-63614/ Rolling Stone''), and {{u|Morbidthoughts}} above, and in RS such as ''https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ywkbqg/fortnite-porn-parody-has-biting-commentary-about-free-to-play-monetization Vice''. It is actually tricky to get RS on porn actresses as you have to wade through the multitude of porn-sites on google
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I can see her winning a non notable award and see her winning a notable award. Per  winning just one notable award should suffice or show evidence of notability. Am I missing something? Please correct me and I’d promptly change my vote to a delete if not then a Keep is most applicable here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Passes the GNG with these articles about her and her works.https://www.laweekly.com/porn-star-april-oneil-just-really-wants-to-win-a-pinball-trophy/https://www.vulture.com/2019/05/riverdale-beaverdale-porn-parody.htmlhttps://www.laweekly.com/10-innovative-porn-stars-who-could-be-the-next-sasha-grey/https://jezebel.com/i-m-hoping-it-won-t-decimate-my-income-tumblrs-porn-ba-1830879496 and passes  as director/writer given her collective body of work receiving coverage https://mashable.com/article/fortnite-porn-parody/https://www.vulture.com/2019/05/riverdale-beaverdale-porn-parody.htmlhttps://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ywkbqg/fortnite-porn-parody-has-biting-commentary-about-free-to-play-monetizationhttps://www.ladbible.com/entertainment/film-and-tv-there-is-a-parody-of-the-lego-movie-on-pornhub-and-its-disturbing-20190211
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Per the sources identified by {{U|Morbidthoughts}} and {{U|Britishfinance}} I think this article has sufficient |notability. It would be good to see the article get expanded though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: does not meet  / . Sourcing is in passing and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:BASIC||WP:SPIP)