Deletion of Sattar Bhagat

Comment: Subject has played first-class cricket and thus meets  (a subsection of ). Sources are always more difficult to find the farther back you get from the internet era (and in non-English-speaking countries in general), but they would definitely exist. CricketArchive (used in the article) and ESPNcricinfo (http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan/content/player/43018.html) are both tertiary sources that demonstrate the existence of those secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:NATHLETE)

Comment: can people please stop doing this. To suggest that one former first-class cricketer is more or less notable than another is violation of , and frankly disruptive. Please explain what makes you believe that the source quoted is not independent or is unreliable. "This article does not cite sources" is an outright lie
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: passes  as the player has played at first-class level, the highest form of domestic cricket.  These AfD's are very much a waste of time excerise, dozens of similar cricketers have been nominated before and all have been kept.  It would be helpful if people consulted the community agreed guidelines about cricketers before nominating for deletion; after all, it's why such guidelines exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)