Deletion of Silent Hill influences and trivia (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per , |Unverifiable, |original research, seemingly |unreliable sources (LiveJournal and Geocities? Give us a break!) and #INFO|Indiscriminate information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:AVTRIV||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: The article is desinged to be trivia and original research. There is no way to save this one because an |encyclopedic treatment is impossible. The keeps in the last debate did not raise one valid point, the closing was definitely in error
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: Trivia is not encyclopedic, see . Influences are very poorly sourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIV)

Comment: per  and . A list of in-jokes and references to other things incorporated into a video game series? No. These things are not notable. The word "trivia" right in its name is always a bad sign. A previous AFD may have said to keep but |consensus can change and consensus against these sorts of articles is pretty clear
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:AVTRIV||WP:OR||WP:CCC)