Deletion of ILinc

Comment: Let's look at the sources. http://www.macworld.com/article/58768/2007/07/ilinc.html This is clearly an unreliable press-release regurgitation. http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/02/25/daily11.html This is not reliable either: it's a puff piece on the organisation that even goes so far as to do it the favour of giving a link to the company's website. Articles based on sources like this violate , and a subject that is only covered by these unreliable sources fails . Wikipedia's reliability is only as good as the sources it relies on. That's why coverage ''in reliable sources'' is a critical part of our notability policies that should not be ignored by the wanton scattergun firing of sources into an article to try to demonstrate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)