Deletion of Radiohalo

Comment: The main problem is with the lack of in-text citations.  There is a pile of references at the end of the article (or was, until all of those written by the main proponent were inexplicably deleted by the nom).  Someone with enough time and interest needs to go through these references and attempt to provide proper citations for the article.  Remember that lack of in-text citations is not a deletion rationale.  The relevant policy is that the article be |verifiable.  But there are references, so go and ''confirm'' or ''disconfirm''.  And while you are doing that, please provide in-line citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: unless before the end of this AfD someone does a major revision of the article. Ordinarily, I would say that notability is a primary concern but in this case  is a bigger problem. From looking at the article, it is really hard to figure out the context or what is really going on here. Loads of 'citations needed' tags and unverified data in the article and only a couple of direct citations. Six years on WP is more than enough time for this article to have been brought to  standards. The article can't really stand as it is. If someone knowledgeable about the subject can produce a reasonable stub while this AfD is open, it could be kept. Otherwise, better to delete the whole thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: The above notes say that this fails  when in fact, it doesn't.  Sure, it doesn't have any internal citations, but deletion isn't the answer to that problem; finding references and citations for it is the solution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)