Deletion of International opinion on the South Atlantic sovereignty dispute

Comment: with all due dispatch, obvious 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: This article IS NOT  since its theme is not the Dispute between the UK and Argentina that dates back 200 years (Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute), but only current international reactions. It is a  of former article. What it '''needs''' to avoid is classifications like ''"supporting the British position"'' or ''"supporting the Argentine position"'', since that's the part that could be seen as a leap of . That's the way it's done in articles like International reactions to the Syrian Civil War, Reactions to the September 11 attacks, Positions on Jerusalem, International reactions to the Gaza War (2008%E2%80%9309), International reactions to the Bahraini uprising (2011%E2%80%93present), etc. There's a constant influx of uninvolved editors that arrive at Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute to include a declaration of a country or organism about the dispute, only to get reverted (see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute&diff=539794058&oldid=539786104https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute&diff=634257633&oldid=633745861https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute&diff=640729008&oldid=635855093https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute&diff=640729345&oldid=640729008); as a plus, this article would solve that problem. Therefore, I'm reiterating the support I gave a while ago.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute&diff=592111882&oldid=592105152
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:SPINOFF||WP:OR)