Deletion of Josh Bunce

Comment: On the |notability page, "'''This page in a nutshell''': A person is presumed to be notable enough for a standalone article if he or she has received '''significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject'''. Notability criteria also must be met for a person to be included in a list or general article; in this case, however, the criteria are less stringent." This person has received ''very little'' coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: satisfies notability criteria in #Athletes.  The arguments for deletion essentially say that these notability criteria should be tightened--however, that debate really should take place on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) rather than with an AfD nomination.  A few thoughts on one-game players: (a) You can't tell, just by looking at the statistics, which biographies will be easy to expand and which ones won't. For example, I've recently found quite a bit of information on a baseball player who played one major league game in 1913 and will soon be expanding his article. (b) If a person with experience in historical or genealogical research made a sufficient effort, most of these stub articles could be expanded to full articles.  The research, however, would involve trips to research libraries and hours spent looking at microfilm. (c) Realistically, most articles of this type are doomed to remain stubs, not because there isn't verifiable source material available, but because Wikipedia doesn't have the editors who are willing to do the work.  So, I think a discussion of changing the notability criteria could be an interesting one, but under the current notability criteria this article clearly needs to be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: the issue with players back in that era is that there isn't significant information that he played in that one game. Stats from that era is almost impossible to |vertify, as there are very little sources to prove it. For all we know, he might have been a replacement player for a day, and went back to his normal job of who knows what. Even meeting , this player must meet the sourcing criteria of |our notabilty guidelines first, as sourcing trumps guidelines period
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:N)