Deletion of Manu Shanker Mishra

Comment: per Spartacus (1960 film)#I am Spartacus!|Spartacus. Also because most of the article is an unintelligible jumble of call codes and the rest of it is an unintelligible jumble of string-theoretic new age buzzword mumbo-jumbo, there are no |reliable sources, and the article presents no reason to believe that the author subject is |notable. Borderline #G1 speedy deletion as patent nonsense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:CSD)

Comment: You are sounding a bit paranoid. Where is there any indication that Cunard or Sodabottle did research in "a couple of seconds"? I have no idea how long they researched for, but Sodabottle's !vote was added almost 2 hours after Cunard put the article to AfD - plenty of time to research. I assume "Mathre Yeager" is meant to be me? I spent about 20 minutes looking for sources (if you look at my contributions, you'll see the gap!). Rather than claiming that we are not researching this person, or that there is a conspiracy, may I suggest that you find |reliable, |independent sources that show that Mishra is |notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:BIO)