Deletion of The Horstmann Technique

Comment: I have found a one definite RS source on google books http://books.google.com/books?id=-cAjdkupIxIC&pg=PA149&lpg=PA149&dq=The+Horstmann+Technique&source=bl&ots=YpPGW1q4PV&sig=CQpj2kB35zltqLJAO43LJQieHOM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=G9NCU6-CJMLbyQGjkoG4Dw&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBDgK#v=onepage&q=The%20Horstmann%20Technique&f=false The Big Picture: Insights from the Spiritual World, some possible (questionable) sources http://www.massagepost.com/massage-post/methods/horstmann-technique.html Massage post, http://www.mackayfitnesscentral.com.au/massage_therapy.php Mackay Fitness Central, and http://www.ovguide.com/horstmann-technique-9202a8c04000641f8000000007350c7a OV Guide, appear to be verifiable and does not hurt notability claims. With the one RS sources this information should be merged if possible per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: for other editors, this article was accepted at  by a now-blocked sock-puppeteer who was blocked the following day and hasn't edited since. Obviously shouldn't have been accepted and it's not the creators fault that it was
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)

Comment: nbsp; to List of alternative therapies.&nbsp; It is not our job as editors to either confirm or deny the TruthTM of this topic.&nbsp; At the same time, as per ringe, it is essential that Wikipedia not reify insignificant topics.&nbsp; But given the 20-year age of this concept, denying its inclusion now is seeming like less-than-convincing censorship.&nbsp; Suppressing this topic on Wikipedia may simply lead to future objections that the topic is missing, as we are already seeing.&nbsp; Since there is no particular need to decide that the topic is or is not notable, merge.&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F)