Deletion of Daniel Imperato (3rd nomination)

Comment: per JayJasper and  (bottom paragraph). I'm not seeing significant coverage of his "unique political ideology and financial career". I'm just seeing a small handful of local articles giving routine campaign press, several dead links and non-RS citations, numerous cites that merely mention Imperato in passing, and just a few (I think only two) articles on the fraud allegations. Sorry, but that dosen't quite cut it. What coverage he does have justifies a redirect, however
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per JayJasper. I also am not finding that he passes . ANYONE who runs for any elected office in the US is bound to get some press coverage, therefore the higher standard of WP:POLITICIAN should be met in most cases. This is one of those where redirecting to the appropriate election article is correct, IMHO of course
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: to Florida gubernatorial election, 2010#No party affiliation, as he was on the ballot in that general election. An examination of the sources supports the nom.'s assertion that he falls short of satisfying the criteria of  & , and thus does not merit a standalone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)