Deletion of Baby Police

Comment: see below) While it is but one of many films from a rather prolific Nigerian director,http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2353738/ and while it might merit a metion in an article on the director had it existed, there is not enough available to source and expand the article to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: as article fails |notability criteria for films
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Added three refs and expanded it. Another depressing AfD, with the occasional injection of asinine comments.  Apart from spotting that the article at present was unsourced, did the nom do any work whatsoever to check if it could be sourceable, per  and ? Never been there, and no plans of going, but Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa, and the eighth most populous country in the world, with a huge entertainment industry. Nigeria is infamous for its Gini coefficient and not exactly famous for widespread Internet access.  They don't speak English you know, so the odds of finding a sizeable Google footprint in English to satisfy  are of course slim, and really, really ought to be considered in the deletion rationale, in particular when, as in this case, there is no problem with |verifiability.  This type of nom lends itself to  problems. The !votes above, that it should be deleted for BLP reasons, for being a one-sentence stub, and "come-on" are downright ludicrous.  Laurels to Schmidt for defending the Wiki-spirit, where do you find the energy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:FILM||WP:V||WP:BIAS)

Comment: While this film may be notable, you wouldn't know from the article. Unfortunately, it cites no |reliable sources. Until the article is properly sourced, policy is to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)