Deletion of MacDade Mall

Comment: as none of the items introduced are reliable sources about the mall.  Further, malls are businesses, and the article contains neither evidence nor an assertion of meeting , the relevant standard for businesses
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: as long on claims, short on |evidence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as failing  -  the references cited don't feature the mall as the subject (I'm discounting Flickr as it is essentially just a photo specific blog), and I've been unable to find any that do. Personally, I agree with Uncle G that nominators should make an effort to do a little research before nominating - editors often put a lot of work into articles and I feel it is disrespectful to nominate without a little background checking, but there is no policy that says you must do this, and putting the onus on the creators to defend their articles is a valid approach too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I strongly disagree with your suggestion that it is necessary to look for and evaluate sources. I do agree that  applies, and I think it is clear that the article fails that criteria. Note that the Flickr link is essentially a personal blog and that the medical article is not ''about'' the mall -- it just mentions it as other articles mention an address. We don't need an article about every street in the nation just because they happen to be mentioned in articles, do we
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)