Deletion of NASIOC

Comment: The number of |single purpose accounts flooding this debate has, of course, influenced my decision. But mainly the lack of a significant, third-party reference that has this group as the subject of the article leads me to say we should boot it. Also, the article is skirting #G11|our blatent advertising speedy delete criterion, and stealing from a charity never appeals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:CSD)

Comment: whatever the merits of the community to its members, it seems to fail |web notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Guys, you might as well stop recruiting people from your club to come in here and say "keep this".  This is not a vote.  Unless |reliable sources have covered this club in a nontrivial way, it's probably going to get deleted.  Your best bet for saving the article is to try to source it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I'm admiring the fact that there is a lot of  here and is that going to have this article kept, well I don't think so, you all needed to be reminded of  as this is what I am noticing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:SOCK)

Comment: A production of NASIOC, PRoN is distributed by a separate, online source.   ITunes and according to :'' if  '''The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster;'''  then we are notable.   i think itunes is independent and respected
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No demonstration of significance and I'd be surprised if any could be found. Currently fails  guidelines, and is really just a puff-piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: No reliable sources.  Doesn't meet .  What else is there?  The fact that numerous Impreza owners have joined Wikipedia is great.  Welcome to Wikipedia. GHowever, that doesn't mean their forum is notable outside of the Impreza owners' circle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: no |reliable sources used as references to establish |notability.  Any sort of report in an independent car magazine, or newspaper review of a local chapter event would help
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORG)

Comment: Well then when it states on  under 7 "Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, Ricky Gervais had a podcast distributed by The Guardian. Such distributions should be nontrivial."  it should all be ignored.  I guess there needs to be a change to  before we change NASIOC
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)