Deletion of Bonnie Prince Charlie (Versailles portrait)

Comment: There is not enough coverage in Wikipedia reliable sources for a stand alone article that meets . Starting from a point where the material should not be in article space, the article headed in the wrong direction by promoting the auction house that made the sale, promoting the name and website of the Paris expert who gave the identity of the portrait, etc. Terms such as |reliable source and |notable have specific meanings in Wikipedia and there doesn't seem to be any effort to adhere to those for this topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: None of the references that I can actually access mentions the painting, and the whole thing has a strong  quality which tends to lead me to believe that we are being used to help sell this painting. I would be more inclined toward |good faith about the book references if there were page references, but since there aren't, I am more inclined to believe that they don't discuss this painting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:AGF)