Deletion of web directories

Comment: Gimpsy and Musicmoz at least. Gimpsy is ordered by actions, not the usual DMOZ-style structure. As for Musicmoz, there aren't many detailed music databases around (the only other one I know is musicbrainz), so why not keep this one? '''Delete''' Goguides and Skaffe as they don't have much going for them. About , I'm sure you can find independent articles about all these websites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Those are all notability things, Orlady; the actual problems with these articles are largely about |verifiability with reliable third-party sources. I would recommend focusing on that problem instead. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: fails verifiability and notability is only weakly asserted above (see ; Alexa ranks are explicitly not a part of the  guidelines). (I should point out that I was the one who added the speedy tags in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:GOOGLE||WP:WEB)

Comment: Gimpsy. In respect to , there are several articles that show notability of Gimpsy, like here http://www.crt.net.au/etopics/gimpy.htm and here http://www.seologic.com/guide/gimpsy.php. Goguides and Skaffe are hardly distinguishable from most other directories which are based on the ODP/DMOZ classification method. As for Musicmoz, the site was unavailable last time I checked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Frankly I don't blame the person who speedy deleted these. They sound like  and provide no evidence of passing . The latter of those is an absolute requirement for inclusion here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:WEB)