Deletion of Astroneer (2nd nomination)

Comment: pretty easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: plenty of sources exist that help this pass  without any difficulty. As far as I'm aware, there has never been any consensus about excluding a game from having an article based on where it was in the development process. As long enough coverage exists, we keep it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per close of the last AFD. There's so many sources for this that it's hard to believe  was followed. All reliables sources, all in just the first page of searching: https://www.engadget.com/2016/12/09/astroneer-game-launch/https://www.destructoid.com/astroneer-is-a-minimalist-no-man-s-sky-408502.phtmlhttp://kotaku.com/space-survival-game-astroneer-will-kill-you-in-all-the-1790201931http://steamed.kotaku.com/i-love-astroneer-for-its-optimism-1791447725http://toucharcade.com/2017/02/16/beware-of-astroneer-scam-app-on-the-app-store/https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2017/01/13/how-astroneer-makes-crafting-fun/http://www.polygon.com/2015/10/7/9471021/find-space-riches-as-you-run-across-the-universe-in-astroneerhttps://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2016/12/12/astroneer-early-access-december-16/http://www.pcgamer.com/astroneer-early-access-begins-next-week/. An additional five reliable sources sources I didn't link are already in a refideas template on the talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)