Deletion of International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails , per IRWolfie and others above. If it's re-recreated, |salt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SALT)

Comment: Fails . There is no significant coverage in  sources found in the ~207 hits for "International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science" on Google Scholar http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=%22International+Conference+on+Condensed+Matter+Nuclear+Science%22&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5 (almost all of which are ). {{mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SECONDARY||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: Classic  fail. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Keep arguments are classic fallacious arguments as has already been pointed out
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Despite  and , lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources. The hits produced by Google are exclusively tangential, trivial or routine, or from unreliable fringe sources. No evidence of notability outside a tiny subsector of the fringe community, not even as a significant fringe event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:LOTSOFSOURCES)