Deletion of James Miller (painter)

Comment: Hard to do a Google search, since the name's so common; but trying his name (both as "James" and as "Jamie") in combination with various keywords from the article and the ''Montreal Review'' piece didn't yield any evidence of significant coverage by independent sources.  My searches turned up his website and the MR article often enough to persuade me that if there was such coverage, I'd have found it.  Fails .  The criteria at  seem even stricter; the subject definitely doesn't seem to meet them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Google isn't  reliable for searches of newspaper/ art journal coverage pre late 1990's,that being said,if no other  verifiable and reliable third party discussion of this artwork can be sourced,delete, Bokomaru's argument of political relevance  although of interest isn't neutral=, if  it is just  unreliably sourced opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. What was added isn't even an article but an interview. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)