Deletion of DartMUD (3rd nomination)

Comment: to LPMud per Cthomas3. DartMUD clearly doesn't have independent notability, but a mention in LPMud is likely warranted.  establishes a presumption in favor of ATDs whenever possible, and I find that the sources even if primary can justify a one-sentence mention of DartMUD in LPMud. Best
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: not only does it fail the , but there doesn’t seem to even have the sourcing the verify it is notable for inclusion on the list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes .  The high POV issues on the page would most likely qualify for , even if it were notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TNT)

Comment: A borderline #G11, and I as an uninvolved admin would have deleted it if it were tagged that way before it was brought here.  If it was a thing, show me third-party reliable sources, even if they're offline.  Because I can't find them online.  And even if they exist, this article would need to be gutted and completely rewritten from scratch to get rid of all the advertising. Worthy of note, self-published sources ''do not establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)