Deletion of Bellevue, Mississippi

Comment: Searching via the handy links above turned up about a half dozen local articles about the politics surrounding the ''possible'' incorporation of this place. None, nada, discussing its existence. Never mind the basis of most deletion discussions, notability, which isn't here either; this fails what is probably our most basic policy, |verifiability. If this is incorrect, {{u|Oiyarbepsy}}, by all means produce some |reliable sources that verify that. But to be honest, your  arguments are getting boreing. Cite some sources, base some arguement in policy, or please stop wasting our time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: It matters because having multiple reliable third party references is what qualifies a place for an article, lacking one of the automatic qualifiers, that being a post office at some time, or listing in the GNIS.  Every place that may be or wants to be does not get an article.  Wikipedia would be overrun with real estate development articles if it did.  What is needed are reliable sources that state it exists, not that it may exist or some folks want it to exist. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: This place doesn't exist yet, so fails .  We do, on occasion, write about things which haven't happened yet.  Super Bowl 50 is a good example, but the bar is pretty high.  The attempt to create this city may happen in the future, but it's nowhere near that bar.  None of the people arguing to keep have provided the  we need (and, no, a photograph of a highway sign doesn't do it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)