Deletion of Dragon Ball canon

Comment: and give two demerits to any editor who inserts unsourced statements on "canon" into any article on fiction on wikipedia.  "Canon" is inherently a violation of NPOV, , and .  It should never be used unless extraordinarily well sourced.  In fact, this article admits to being a product of fan-activity in the first 10 words.  It should also not be kept because we have a crappy article on the general usage of canon in works of fiction
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: because it fails , and , and it doesn't follow .  This is original research on the part of all the editors.  They may be justified in their conclusions about the "canonness", but it i still original research.  There is no verifiability as there is not authority determining what is canon, and no sources from which to draw this information.  And there are disputes of the what is and isn't canon because of this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as |original research and inescapably |POV when based on fan interpretations of what is and is not canon. Wikipedia is not the place to assess what is canon for a series or assign levels of canonization
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NPOV)