Deletion of Dreamland Villa, Arizona

Comment: Is it incorporated?  If so,  applies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: This appears to be one of a series of articles created as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge|The 50,000 Challenge.  While I'm happy to take part in this challenge, a lot of the obvious  and  violations I see, a microcosm of the way the encyclopedia has been going in general, reminds me of why my interest in the project is declining.  The keep votes in this AFD appear to be based on the rationale that a GNIS entry = notability, which in itself blatantly runs afoul of NOTDIR, especially when there's not much more to be said about the topic.  :Category:Populated places in Juneau City and Borough, Alaska contains a slew of |permastubs sourced to GNIS, created in 2009 and 2010 with no substantial improvement since.  GNIS's own sources for those entries are predominately from the 1950s and 1960s, when those places stood a chance of being viewed as separate communities.  Nowadays, not a chance;  they're basically neighborhoods of Juneau, which has been the equivalent of a consolidated city-county for over four-and-a-half decades.  That may or may not be the case here, but I see it's nonetheless tied to a decades-old source.  Perhaps the nominator means that this area is within Mesa's ZIP Code market area
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERMASTUB)

Comment: Populated places, regardless of their size, that aren't neighborhoods of a larger city are considered notable. This isn't actually within the corporate limits of Mesa, so it's notable in its own right. Also,  covers legally recognized places, not just incorporated places; for instance, census-designated places are recognized by the U.S. Census Bureau, and smaller communities like this one are recognized by the U.S. Geological Survey
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)