Deletion of Margaret Tusz-King

Comment: per , candidate who hasn't held office.  Above claim that she should be kept because she's more notable than Jessica Simpson (!!) is laughably ridiculous
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: You'd probably benefit by reading the guidelines at otability, which set out a (reasonably) straightforward and objective standard, which is in essence, that if a subject has received sufficient attention from third party reliable sources, they're notable.  If you think she's notable, then pull together as much of that sort of material as you can.  Arguing about whether she ought to be deemed notable, in the absence of such coverage, is not likely to get very far
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)