Deletion of Achinger coat of arms

Comment: This nomination does not properly list the articles to be deleted per . Considering some 250 articles (per nominator's reckoning) under the title of one article does not give proper notice to anyone scanning the AfD page. Special:Contributions/24.151.116.25|24.151.116.25
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BUNDLE)

Comment: While these articles contain verifiable info (and references are available, e.g., in Polish wikipedia,), they left unreferenced and basically abandoned, so formally Fram is right. I suggest the community must |pledge to rescue these articles and postpone this vote for, say, 1 month
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:ARS)

Comment: I'm also tempted to |slap the nominator with a trout for blanket nom. E.g. Białynia coat of arms has a solid text, a reference (and more a readily found) and is used for noble families with wikipedia articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: I reviewed briefly several other pages. Most of them are in good state, i.e., not "in a state similar to this one". "Massive", "walled garden", "abandoned" are not valid reasons for deletion. Moreover, the fact that "They are all listed in some catalogues of coats of arms" means that  all of them have multiple sources of verifiable information, hence satisfy the |general criterion of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)