Deletion of Thomson Airways flight BY-1526

Comment: There are dozens of similar incidents every year, the vast majority of which fall under  and/or do not meet . This one is no different
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per comment below.  For some reason I thought the accident report had just been published, but it actually was published nearly a year ago and that's when a lot of the worldwide coverage of the event occurred.  per .  Flying is hard.  Mistakes happen.   I really don't envision a situation 15 years from now when someone will ask their friend, "remember that time that plane took off but the pilots made a mistake and something really bad could have happened but everything worked out just fine, and the plane landed safely?"  But right now, there appears to be worldwide coverage of the event (or non-event, depending on your perspective).   Under the principle of the essay , let's give this a month or three to let the facts settle.  We might learn soon that there was scandalous misconduct on the part of the flight crew.  Or, more likely, we won't learn anything since this will turn out to be a simple mistake that resulted in the flight crew being asked nicely not to do that again please. Or being newly unemployed and never heard from again, since it's Thomson Airways that just went bankrupt and ceased all operations.   I expect to wholeheartedly support deletion this December or next January if nothing new comes out before then, if this article survives this AFD, but for now, let's give it a bit of time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT||WP:NORUSH)

Comment: It is a bad sign when the majority of an article is . Furthermore, this is, while an interesting incident, also what looks like a  incident.  Aside from the flurry of coverage right after it happened and some articles right after the report was published, it doesn't look to have attracted attention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:MILL)

Comment: a relevant incident with  and no need for continued coverage  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: did not receive lasting or sustained coverage - all of the articles, which I believe would ordinarily be good enough for  given their international scope in a range of respected newspapers, all ran the story on 22 November 2018, and all of the articles state essentially the same thing - the news is that a report came out. Doesn't appear to be an event that has sustained lasting coverage, a requirement for an article on the site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Already !voted delete above, but this was such a non-notable incident, I cannot find any contemporaneous news articles from 21 July 2017. Aviation Herald, which is pretty on top of things, only created their article on 25 July 2017 and rated it an "incident," of which they rate several every day, and of which very few are notable. https://avherald.com/h?article=4ac18a5b The only news here is the release of the report, which received heavy media coverage, but again, we are . Compare to the Qatar Miami flight or the Emirates Melbourne flight, both of which received international news immediately following their issues
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)