Deletion of Tiger Tyson

Comment: Well written! It has enough independent sources and passed . I noticed that the article has been rewritten / expanded after the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: What it seems to be is many many tiny and trivial citations attempting to add up to one big "it's notable!", but it just doesn't get there. No criteria of  have been met ("notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions", no. "fan base or cult following", no evidence presented of this. "unique, prolific or innovative contributions", no evidence of this, "thug porn" appears to be an unremarkable niche genre). As for , no, everything is either trivial (Paper Magazine bio sheet) or not independent from the subject (all the AVN awards). The play based on his life was intriguing, but again, a  non-notable performance in itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: does not meet  / . Sourcing is in passing and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ENT||WP:SPIP)

Comment: Hmm! What constitutes a notable porn film? I don't see usual academics writing about porn. Reliable and independent sources exists and supports notability. It does not matter whether the acknowledgement was 11 years ago. |Notability is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: I just don't see any notability here. I checked  (John B123 Thanks) but all 3 bullets there appear to fail: (1) "significant roles in multiple notable films," - none, otherwise there would be blue links in the movies cited in his article. (2) "large fan base or a significant 'cult' following." - none, otherwise his website link in his infobox wouldn't be for sale and, instead, it would be boasting with followers counted in the 100,000's, (3) "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." - not really: the only claim to fame he seems to have is he got "inducted into the GayVN Hall of Fame in February 2008", but that was 11 years ago, what other recognition has he gotten since? Also, that single (and seemingly inconsistent) award by itself could hardly, IMO, be called a claim to fame. Sorry, I would had voted to keep but the rationale just isn't there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Yet another anti-porn nomination from the same editor. Article easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: outright since subject fails . Some participants in this discussion seem to forget or ignore https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=889368900#Request_for_comment_regarding_PORNBIO this RfC outcome that has conclusively deprecated WP:PORNBIO. This means that all criteria specifically meant for persons in the porn industry are now defunct; arguments based on them do not get off the starting blocks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)