Deletion of Kevin Nalty (2nd nomination)

Comment: The links at the bottom are all trivial or non-reliable third party sources (youtube, self published, blogs, etc.)  The Adweek reference mentions him in one sentence in passing (trivial mention) the Wall Street Journal article has a passing mention in an article about searching on youtube in general (very trivial) and the LA Times article also mentions him in passing in an article about product placement (trivial).  No indication of notability, either through the general notability guidelines, or by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: The links in the references and external links section at the bottom of the article alone show he's been extensively interviewed in both online and regular media sources (which means he's received coverage by multiple reliable independendent sources per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: there are several sources in |reliable publications (such as http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080527.wgtprodplace0526/BNStory/Technology/home/ this one which isn't in the article), most of them are pretty trivial but they probably do include enough descriptive information about the subject to support a |verifiable |stub. If it's deemed there is not enough coverage to establish |notability for an individual article a |merge somewhere might be appropriate. The subject seems to be discussed in terms of general "new media" and new advertising techniques rather than specifically because they use YouTube
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:STUB||WP:NN||WP:MERGE)