Deletion of Artemis Eternal (2nd nomination)

Comment: and tag for further expansion. Article is well sourced and passed the  with flying colors. Pity that it had not been expanded since the last AfD, but thank goodness wiki has no . Heck... maybe I'll even do some expansion myself, as the refs offer plenty from which to work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: The AfD mentions  which says the film should either have begun principal photography or its production itself meets .  This appears to satisfy the second option quite well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:N)

Comment: Normally I'd say delete, as we're |not a crystal ball in to the future of film or any other discipline. But the letter and spirit of |verifiability definitely overrules that inclination this time around. The sourcing is pretty darn concrete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BALL||WP:V)