Deletion of Catheleen Jordan

Comment: All this effort has only made it more clear that she doesn't pass . And I don't understand or buy the "regional notability" argument: for a keep based on that argument, I'd expect to see e.g. multiple in-depth profiles of her in local newspapers, or something like that, but all I see is an academic whose academic notability is not enough to be more than regional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: fails  -- the books are student textbooks, no surprise that they don't get cited. There's no evidence that that they are particularly significant textbooks either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Personally, I don't care whether this is an autobio or not, that is a reason to check for POV, not for deletion (it is ''discouraged'', not ''forbidden'' and at least this editor is honest enough to use a recognizable username). However, the GS cites are too low as yet to establish notability according to criterion 1 of  and being president of a local chapter does not satisfy criterion 6
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Why does it matter if she meets  when it's clear she ''does'' meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Close-ish to passing , but not quite. Non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)