Deletion of Kobold (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: to Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons. The sources identified above do not contribute to notability. The ''Screenrant'' article is a trivial "Top 10" listicle, the Game Informer article does not convey notability onto the race as a whole per , ''The Monsters Know What They're Doing'' is a Game Guide that never contributes to notability, and the mention in ''Of Dice and Men'' is nothing more than a passing mention. The ComicBook article probably does contribute to notability, but that is just one source. Of course, a Merge to Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons is still appropriate considering the existence of this one source
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: meets , a big thanks to above editors for highlighting the numerous |sources available above, this looks like another case of |"Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:ARTN)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons per above comments since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: Now I'll admit that I have often voted for deletion in the Fancruft filled realm of DnD, and think that it needs a solid cutting down. But Kobolds? The sourcing alone shows that they're an iconic part of the DnD universe, and I'd bet that a fair number of folks who've never played DnD could tell you what a Kobold was. DnD articles need a  cleanup, but this is not one of them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)