Deletion of Chessie Moore (2nd nomination)

Comment: She fails  and a large number of non-notable films don't change that. Also, I don't see the nom as agreeing. I see him trying to prevent the "look how many movies he/she was in" dodge from being used to preserve articles about non-notable actors/actresses.....like Ms. Moore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: per meeting . Yes, she seems to fail  http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2003&q=%22Chessie+Moore+%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Chessie+Moore+%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go, but she is known all over the internet http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Chessie+Moore+%22&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8. So I headed over to  ("''A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards''") to see what other ways an article might evidence notability if the GNG is not met. She fails , , , , , and tickles at , but seems to pass  in that she "''Has had significant roles in multiple commercially produced or significant films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions''" and "''Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following''". Not meeting other inclusion criteria does not matter as long as she meets  through 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:PROF||WP:ATH||WP:CREATIVE||WP:DIPLOMAT||WP:PORNBIO||WP:ENT||WP:BIO||WP:ENT)