Deletion of NewtonX, Inc. (2nd nomination)

Comment: Bing's'' news section shows articles about the company in top tier publications, such as ''Tech Crunch'', ''VentureBeat'', ''Yahoo Finance'', ''Inc. (magazine)|Inc.'', ''Entrepreneur (magazine)|Entrepreneur'', and the list goes on. https://www.bing.com/news/search?q=NewtonX&FORM=HDRSC6 The topic meets  and if there are sources in that list which aren't currently present in the article, they can be added there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The article clearly passes ; a simple Google search alone for NewtonX provides 753,000 results (an increase from the previous yield of 227,000 results). https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNSiszYuc174Vmk05XSuCQYnDRQz5A%3A1570832717503&ei=TQGhXearHs6usAXy8o7QDQ&q=NewtonX&oq=NewtonX&gs_l=psy-ab.3..35i39l2j0i20i263j0j0i20i263j0l5.2492.4478..4642...1.2..4.222.1817.3j10j1......0....1..gws-wiz.....10..0i71j35i362i39j0i67j0i273j0i131.RNXm0nSh0_c&ved=0ahUKEwimhoPxn5XlAhVOF6wKHXK5A9oQ4dUDCAs&uact=5 {{nowrap
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The citations used in the article are reliable and with Scope creep calling some of the references press releases (when there is no indication that they are press releases), he is setting up a straw man. In addition to the Tech Crunch https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/18/two-sigma-leads-12m-series-a-for-expert-knowledge-network-newtonx/, VentureBeat https://venturebeat.com/2019/06/18/newtonx-raises-12-million-to-help-companies-find-expert-consultants/, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2018/06/26/entrepreneurial-networking-10-approaches-you-can-use/#6574978ce428, and Inc. (magazine)|Inc. https://www.inc.com/dana-sitar/expect-rapid-growth-in-2019-take-these-7-steps-now-to-keep-your-employees-sane.html publications--all of which are authoritative with respect to the field of business--NewtonX Inc. is quoted in other reliable citations, such as Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2018/06/26/entrepreneurial-networking-10-approaches-you-can-use/#6713de9e4287. This clearly establishes its notability (making it pass  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . I don't think the '''keep''' !voters are helping matters by indiscriminately throwing up sources without regard to the quality or depth of coverage. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20190305005523/en/Wells-Fargo-Innovation-Incubator-Announces-1-Million Businesswire and https://www.finsmes.com/2018/09/expert-search-engine-newtonx-raises-3m-in-seed-funding.html finmes are clearly pulling from the same press release. Maybe there's a non-trivial mention buried in one of the dozen or so links that have been posted so far, but I can't find one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: not enough in-depth coverage which is not simply PR regurgitation to show it passes either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: per otability and ermastub, not to mention uffery and the above rationale
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:P||WP:P)

Comment: I cannot find references that meet  to show notability under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:NCORP)

Comment: I have no idea why it was recreated under a ''different'' title, but this still Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)