Deletion of Fire glass

Comment: I added three references to the article and took out a non-neutral phrase. The resulting article has secondary, independent, and in-depth references from wisegeek (marginal in-depth), Glass on Web, and the Illinois State Journal Register newspaper. The reference from woodlanddirect is a primary reference from a retailer of of fire glass, but has some useful information. The eHow reference seems like a useful secondary reference, but eHow is blacklisted from Wikipedia, so is probably not considered reliable. From this, it looks like there are multiple secondary reliable sources and the topic modestly passes general notability guidelines . At this point the article doesn't look all that promotional to me and the woodlanddirect source could be dropped if that is a concern. Notability, along with no major advertising/promotional problems lead me to recommend keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'd say it just about passes , search engine results return some secondary coverage and the topic is not particularly obscure or unknown. The article doesn't appear to resemble an advertisement in its current form
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)