Deletion of List of cult films (3rd nomination)

Comment: I think we're now at the point where this proposal should end. I'm glad that people have appreciated the significant problems with the article, but it was not my intention to propose this article for deletion in order to bring attention to those problems, my intention was entirely to delete and restart this article per , which I appreciate is not nearly a consensus view of the community. This can't be closed by myself early as a speedy keep because not all views except mine were to keep, but this should now be moved to the talk page of the article. As for the splits, surely by decade is preferable to alphabetically
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: for reasons already decided at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_cult_films_(2nd_nomination) 2nd nomination.  No compliance with efore.  The Wikipedia death penalty of elete is totally inappropriate.    don't like it is not a policy based reason to delete. ot paper.  This is a waste of a lot of editor's valuable time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:D||WP:I||WP:N)

Comment: the original list, as it has clear inclusion criteria, and then restore the A-Z sub-lists per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE)