Deletion of United States v. Stumbo

Comment: I don't know how this |run of the mill drug case is notable. There's no evidence it has any value as precedent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: In the discussion above, a commentator asks "I don't think the status of "legal precedent" is a criterion for AfD. Or do I err? Please indicate here the reasons you think it is an AfD criterion.". Of course, "legal precedent" is not an AFD criterion but it is a dimension of "lasting effect"  - see . Candidly, this is a current event that fails . A straw in the wind that this case has had no lasting effect is that all the sources in the page are within two months of the case. Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0|2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:EVENT)