Deletion of Eva Haller

Comment: The subject passes . Also, the nomination's rationale "no indication of significance" is vague relative to content in the article, in which  indication of significance does exist. Some source examples that demonstrate this subject passes  include
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I can't quite find her to be |notable as Wikipedia defines it. Philanthropy is nice, serving on boards of directors is fine, being an activist is all very well - but none of those things by themselves amount to notability. In order to have an article here, a person must have received |significant coverage from independent reliable sources, and I could find none. The only Reliable Source cited in the article is the obituary of her first husband. The other citations are either based on information she herself supplied, or are not what we consider a Reliable Source. And I could not find significant material for either Eva Haller or Eva Roman on a search. It sounds like she is a wonderful and remarkable woman, but without the independent sources to prove it, we can't have an article on her. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:42)