Deletion of Becky Smith (academic)

Comment: One marginal  from a local tabloid, but no real assertion of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It's a  subject, so we need extra care about making sure we have mainstream sources rather than ones that take a fringe point of view. In that respect, the quote from her in the one independent source we have (a local newspaper story) saying that she considers herself a skeptic is reassuring. And assuming that she does take that point of view, I don't see why the "dubious scientific value" of her research should be relevant — she appears to be more a historian of local folklore than a scientist. Nevertheless, we have no evidence of passing  and a local newspaper story doesn't go very far towards passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am not sure of any |Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, subject would be able satisfy at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)