Deletion of Enectali Figueroa

Comment: I don't know where all these keeps are suddenly coming from, but I don't see any evidence that he passes . My default assumption is that assistant professors are typically not yet sufficiently notable / have not yet had time to develop the academic impact needed to pass  #1. I don't see anything exceptional about this case that would cause it to rise above that default level
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets , and there is clear consensus to keep. Wikipedia BLPs don't weight the ''importance of a topic'' but the relative notability of a given person within a topic. Hence being a top dog in "position-sensitive x-ray microcalorimeters" is notable. Not to mention that X-ray astrophysics is were a lot of the discoveries on the early universe are happening and position-sensitive x-ray microcalorimeters are a key part of this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Like David Eppstein and Agricola44, I could not find enough to establish notability under . Does not seem to pass  either. He has a good chance of becoming WP-notable in the future, under either  or , but this is a clear example of a biographical article that was created too early. Definitely a role model for all Hispanics, but not WP-notable yet. Sometimes these hasty article creations for junior academics do more harm than good for the subject, and I think that the discussion going on here is a good example of that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)