Deletion of 2003 Route 60 Hamas ambush

Comment: As usual, |existence is not notability, and not every terrorist attack is notable.  There is nothing stated in the article claiming, for example, retaliatory action by the IDF or settlers or whomever, nor is it shown to be referenced in other attacks (both of which would show longer-term impact).  What I ''do'' see, however is a long-term lawsuit, but it's not against the Israeli government, the Palestinian government, Hamas, or anyone who could be considered directly involved; it's a suit against the Arab Bank, and ''that's'' the notable and long-term part, as it's been in court for over a decade and recently settled.  Therefore, the notability isn't separable from the lawsuit, and it's also not the only one against the bank for terrorism.  Therefore, this would be much better suited as its own heading in Arab Bank incorporating all pertinent material from here.  That is SOP for articles that aren't really standalone notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (events). It has had a |lasting effect as E.M.Gregory has explained Special:Diff/678758794|here. Therefore, there is |continued coverage a decade after the event. The sources' |geographical scope is wide-ranging and |diverse. The event happened on Highway 60 (Israel). The sources in the article include ''The New York Times'', the ''New York Post'', CNN, Newsday, the Associated Press, and ''Haaretz''. This easily meets Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:DIVERSE)