Deletion of Nebraskana

Comment: The article was originally called Nebraskana Society and was intended (apparently) to be about an honor society rather than about a book.  For whatever reason, the author never went beyond the 1932 book in gathering information about the organization, although there are things available http://www.google.com/search?q=%22nebraskana%20society%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&tab=nw.  The  nominator rewrote the perspective of the article to be about the book http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nebraskana&diff=next&oldid=364590705, based on the limited information in the article, and then nominated his or her own work for deletion.  Thus, I can't see judging this by  alone, and I'm going to throw in "Nebraskana Society" in to the title of the discussion .  On the other hand, I don't see any news or book evidence to show that the Nebraskana Society was ever notable.  If anyone out of the Cornhusker State wants to write an article about the society itself, I'm all for keeping
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: as article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Since there has been suggestion that  is not the only relevant guideline, I would just mention that the Nebraskana Society seems to fall short very short of . The only substantial coverage of the group I can find is in the book which is not independent of the society and even if it were independent, one book does not constitute multiple sources. The first http://www.google.com/search?q=%22nebraskana%20society%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&tab=nw hit on Google regarding the society as linked above is the online digitized copy of the book. Everything else seems to be genealogical work or various other listings. In sum, I think the book fails to meet  and the organization or whatever one would call it fails to meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:ORG||WP:NBOOK||WP:ORG)