Deletion of Cumberland Police Department (Maryland)

Comment: Our |editing policy mandates that we should keep respectable, sourced content of this kind.  Consideration of merger into other articles about the municipality is a matter of ordinary content editing, not requiring deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I have updated the article with independent, verifiable, third-party information that specifically identifies the subject in detail. The article falls within the guidelines for , specifically . Also, a http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=cumberland+police+department+maryland&aq=0&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=Cumberland+Police+Department%2C+Ma&gs_rfai=&fp=ca6b5a4f84435186 google search shows the WP article is researched by the general public enough that it shows up as the second-most accessed link (after the subject's own website
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: I would say that such an article could be kept, see, ''e.g.'', Genesee County Sheriff's Office (New York)|Genesee County Sheriff.  However, I'd also like to see |better sourcing and facts or statistics about crimes reported to and solved by the department.  Discuss, please
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Probably a good time for both of you to call a cease-fire, before this escalates any further.   includes an admonition against "aggressive behavior", and neither of you is entirely innocent in that regard.  By the same token, neither of you has been bested by the other.  It doesn't matter who started it, and it doesn't matter which person gets the last word. I've been blocked before, and trust me, it's no fun... and it's not worth it either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: per  and .  It is getting to the threshold of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:BARE)