Deletion of Davor Pavlovic

Comment: The PNAS article from 2003 (currently reference 3) has been cited about 200 times (Web of Science, almost 350 on GScholar). However, that is the only paper that made some impact. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=rqGUtP4AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao Pavlovic's GS profile indicates a grand total of 448 citations (including that PNAS article...) for an h-index of 6. | too early, does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The text of the article with respect to the p7 discovery published in PNAS is very misleading. It implies Pavlovic made the discovery independently, whereas he was actually a grad student. With rare exception in life science doctoral programs, it is the lab PI who directs the work and who is credited with discovery, as evidenced by having "senior authorship" on the paper (as is the case here). The subject has not yet established an ''independent'' scientific reputation &ndash; 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: More  are now attempting to interfere. The commentator(s) should please be aware that this behavior is almost always counter-productive. The best way to save the article is to find sources that demonstrate the subject's notability. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCKS)

Comment: I don't think one well-cited student paper and not much else should be good enough for , in part because it's too difficult to tell how much credit is due to the student and how much to his or her advisor.  also seems relevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E)