Deletion of Child Support Policy

Comment: per nom and Isotope23.  Child support in the United States and child support should be covering the policy behind child support if they are not already.  These also appear to be possible |POV forks
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per nom.  Obvious 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: per nom. There is no excuse for creating Wikipedia:Content forking|content forks, particularly where they are POV forks or intended to evolve into POV forks. If the existing articles have POV problems, work on fixing the problems, not creating new forks to skew in a different POV direction. Oh, and BTW, the fork article people are aiming for is Wikipedia:Content forking, with abbreviations WP:CFORK or WP:POVFORK, not 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: per nomination as |unnecessary forks. These are redundant with existing articles (Child Support for example), poorly cited, and an the case of Child Support Policy it isn't even an encyclopedia article (in fact it is borderline incorrect usage of the article space); it appears to be a proposal for one
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)