Deletion of Freopedia

Comment: if editors work on articles is considered a COI then we have a problem thats is greater than this one article being discussed at AfD. A reasonable person could say that had I specified an expressed opinion it could be COI. The reasons being I started Freopedia, I'm VP of WMAU and I was finalist in the State Heritage awards because of my work on Freopedia and other projects that continue to have a positive impact on Wikipedia content. Editting articles about a broad topic/subject area isnt COI, reality is COI is about deriving some benefit that could potentially influence the content created and the way its presented even I dont stand to benefit or lose what ever the content. The articles existence has no bearing on the project its future nor its success, it was originally a redirect to the project page but that other discussion decided that an article was preferred option.  The nominator is correct in saying the Cockburn Gazette covers small area part of the Perth Metro area they say on their FB page that the circulation is around 36,000 but importantly its circulation areas doesnt include Fremantle. Other references show that it has reach is outside of Australia adding to notability, whether a publication is monthly, weekly, daily or just a once off is irrelevant the measure is is it a  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: I still fail to see any reason for  - too many afds like this from ,low edit possibly  are given credit by well meaning misinterpreters of the AGF principle.  I say even just one clue to the nominators nomination text of the slightest  negative bias should see the nomination thrown out, regardless of the veracity of the actual intent of the nomination. I still stand by the checkuser suggestion, and a closer watch on eds who think 2 edits with knowledge of the issues as shown in the nomination be '''not''' assumed good faith. Where has the knowledge about notability come from?  The responses above are basically feeding a Troll - and I thought in the old days we didnt do that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:SPA)