Deletion of Perturbation training (2nd nomination)

Comment: offline sources are a real pain. That said, I'm going to  that they are legit.  If that's true, then the topic seems to pass  easily.  That it is primarily edited by one enthusiastic editor does not bother me unless it can be shown that there is some kind of policy violation that I am missing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:GNG)

Comment: contains no real assertion of notability. The article has 51 citations, all from a single editor who's never edited anything else, which almost certainly means someone has put their university assignment essay onto Wikipedia. In other other words, it's . Maybe merge the important bits into Fall prevention, but I assume the 2017 merge never happened because it was too hard, so I vote delete. Preserve the text somewhere like Talk:Fall prevention for anyone who wants to attempt the merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: to Fall prevention, per previous AfD; in any case, a merge does not require AfD approval. When two articles cover the same ground a merge to fix the  is the appropriate remedy
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)