Deletion of The Skeptic (film)

Comment: obviously notable and meets . Well discussed in numerous news sources that were easily found in a quick Google news search. Being a stub is not, by itself, a valid reason for deleting, but to address the issue, the article has now been greatly expanded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: with concerns that the nom does not seem to have practiced diligent  or considered . And if not Speedy, than call for  clause in and through the work by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: if editors are voting to keep this article out of a desire to reserve deletion for only the most extreme cases of non-notability, that is an entirely defensible point of view and I respect it.  If  is only a loose guideline to be followed and it is not important whether a film satisfies those criteria, then fine, let's leave it out.  But please, please let us not continue to argue that the film satisfies the  criteria when it so plainly does not.  If the guideline is to mean anything at all, let us at least be candid about whether it really applies here.  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NF)