Deletion of Guilford Day School

Comment: I was unsure what to do with this article, as it is a school that fails to provide why it's notable. However, due to how well the article is formatted and worded on ''the first try'' I am inclined to keep for the time being, allowing for a bit more time to let the author assert notability. '''I recommend that this AfD last the entire five days and not be closed before then to allow time for the author to fix any problems with the article''' However, a major problem, beyond its lack of notability is the fact that it sounds like an |advertisement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: per nom. I agree with Pumeleon that the AfD should run the entire five days&mdash;which is the usual procedure anyway. I'm willing to change my vote if the article is expanded to include good, verifiable source citations to |reliable sources that show that there is widespread interest in the school and that it is considered to be of some special importance in educational circles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)