Deletion of Roxanne Dubé (2nd nomination)

Comment: I continue to assert that permanent ambassadors are notable per , as their positions are plenipotentiary, granting them, at least in theory, power equivalent to heads of state.  is a worthless criteria, and I'm considering starting a discussion to have it deleted. As an ambassador, she was the subject of significant coverage in reliable (and less-reliable) sources. Some users may claim that this is routine coverage for an ambassador, however I believe that if a position routinely results in significant media coverage, holders of said position are probably notable. http://allafrica.com/stories/200602270547.html, http://allafrica.com/stories/200706110535.html, http://allafrica.com/stories/200803180110.html, http://books.google.ca/books?id=ey1OAQAAIAAJ, http://senatordonaldoliver.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=148&Itemid=101, http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/01/26/canada-to-france-keep-your-election-to-yourself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:DIPLOMAT)

Comment: sufficient |notability to get her past a Wikipedia inclusion rule — be it  or  — has not actually been demonstrated here. No prejudice against future recreation if somebody can write a ''good'' article about her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:DIPLOMAT||WP:POLITICIAN)