Deletion of Eran Elhaik

Comment: The highly cited publications on Google Scholar look to have 40+ authors!  Excluding papers with extremely high numbers of authors, there's one with a mere 6 authors and 472 citations; after that, it's 72 citations.  There is a case for  C1, but it is much weaker than it first appears
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Per #C1 and heavily cited publications on Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=B19w0l4AAAAJ. Article appears factual and not excessively promotional to me. And he has significant international news coverage for his work https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/scientists-reveal-jewish-historys-forgotten-turkish-roots-a6992076.html https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-dna-tech-pinpoints-yiddish-origins-to-north-turkey/ https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-the-jewish-people-s-ultimate-treasure-hunt-1.5283624 The facts that the article appears to have come under attack by SPA Elbeavo long after its creation, and has recently been tag-bombed by Ixocactus, are also not reasons for deletion. I am suspicious that his research is unwelcome to some ears for reasons unrelated to whether or not it is valid scientifically (about which I have no informed opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)