Deletion of A wife confused for a sister

Comment: per . As with many other Biblical entries, this article attempts to "interpret" the Torah based on the plain meaning of the words or on the documentary hypothesis, which is just that, a hypothesis. This so-called "theme" is not even discussed as such by the classic Jewish commentaries on the Bible. I also am baffled by the title, "A wife confused for a sister." Why "confused
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per .  Appears to be somebody's school essay just pasted in as an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: thought it certainly needs work, the |NOR claim doesn't fly, the article is well documented with it's sources though citations would be a good improvement which isn't a reason to delete either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per . As of  no sources for this theme were given. Web searches on this theme proved unfruitful. If sources and a close enough theme name will be provided, I may review my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: as |original research.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)