Deletion of Chili burger (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . Nominated before and the keep case there seems strong to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Article has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and meets .  Concerns about a history section's scope |hardly warrants deletion.  I don't know if the nominator's questions are supposed to be rhetorical, but if not then those are questions that should be asked |before nominating an article for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROBLEM||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Suitably notable with plenty of sources. Nom fails  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)