Deletion of Hazel Carter

Comment: as per  and notable for one event only
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: her story was printed in hundreds of newspapers in 1917 and 1918 (https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=%22private+hazel+carter%22&dr_year=1917-1918 here is a sample). She seems to pass , , and . I think the 1E issue is clear, but the event itself seems fairly significant, given the coverage. For the event to be covered under , however, it is expected to have more duration of coverage and I'd like to see recent coverage in some detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:NEVENT)

Comment: As it was at nomination, it was a textbook . Now, however, it's a textbook . Well done and notability well established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:HEY)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per  and the "covered in her own time and later" observations above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: I think the coverage in independent sources is sufficient to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passing trivia and Wikipedia is not a newspaper, see otnews. Also given she was only written about "a lot" 100 years ago, only further shows the trivial passing interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)