Deletion of Murder of Adrianne Reynolds

Comment: I see a lack of |lasting effects
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)

Comment: Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Inclusion criteria states that "Routine kinds of news events – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance." After reading the aftermath section, there are no lasting significance of the murder. The article should also be deleted per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)

Comment: Meets , , /CA and . In the case of events, persistence and diversity in sources is key. Because we're dealing with convicted and incarcerated living people, we have a special responsibility to honor the intent of . Per CRIME, we don't have articles on the perpetrators or the victim, but as that section suggests, on the event. As an event, this meets lots of EVENT criteria. We've got multiple linked news sources, (uncited) claim of national headlines, three news feature documentaries, and at least one book length treatment. Per N/CA multiple diverse sources can confer notability on an event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DIVERSE||WP:N||WP:CRIME||WP:BLP)

Comment: satisfies , several of the delete arguments here fail  i.e. the topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline in the past, it does not need to have ongoing coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: I am ''in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles'', in particular those who fail  and disregard , such as this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENTS||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)