Deletion of Kaali Sudheer

Comment: as failing  and . This verifiable BLP can demonstrate the fellow exists and has performed valuable service in his arena of endeavor. Sources provided and found in a reasonable search don't provide assertion of notability, however. Bare mentions in art-related press and coverage in press releases don't pass the bar for a BLP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:BIO)

Comment: This person ,as claimed, may have contributed positively towards art,yet it is not a reason for notablility.  /  in general says that "person has received a well-known and significant award or honor" or "widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record" as a criteria for any biography.I agree he is the curator of ,so called, art museum,but there are many others doing the same thing.So, what is the distinctive thing / contribution for which he should have a separate article? 70% of the article speaks about exhibitions at the gallery.But this makes the gallery notable not the curator.For me this person's most notable contribution is founding the art gallery / foundation (if we believe the article).But their are no independent reliable sources to verify this claim.Thus this article fails ,, and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:VERIFY)