Deletion of North Epping murders

Comment: Agreed, covered by . Likewise, any claims about possible future developments is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: as per . agree with above, the real test is if it is still covered in the media well after the event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Tragic, but  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per #NEWS Arbitrary rules about the number of people dead are quite frankly useless in assessing the encyclopedic worth of an article. As it stands this article is a news article, not an encyclopedia article and at the moment there is little encyclopedic to write about the subject. Perhaps when more information is available and the crime is placed in some context by third parties an encyclopedic article can be written. Until then this does not belong here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as mentioned previously, |not the news. Possibly worth a mention, if properly sourced, in the Crime in Sydney article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: With all due respect, it appears to me that you are anvassing for keep votes on users talk pages. w
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: The event is cearly notable, meeting both  and /CA. If a notable event (i.e. one which receives significant coverage) happens every day, then Wikipedia should have a new article about an event every day. I don't think we should delete pages just because there are lots of them. And this event has received "significant coverage in sources with national or global scope", see ABC News, news.com.au, The Age. This '''isn't''' "routine news coverage", so OTNEWS doesn't apply. The fact that it currently contains very little information is something which should be improved, and can be thanks to the significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Let it be noted that, to date, 5 Keep votes http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/North_Epping_murders&diff=303507427&oldid=303503770 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/North_Epping_murders&diff=303509441&oldid=303507427 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/North_Epping_murders&diff=303517339&oldid=303516732 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/North_Epping_murders&diff=303608834&oldid=303539982 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/North_Epping_murders&diff=303662467&oldid=303635195 have been recorded by editors specifically |canvassed by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASSING)

Comment: per nom. #NEWS. This is a single event, and the murder of a family is a far too common event. w
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Shall we also remove the comments of any editor brought here by otestacking activity
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Let's not mince words, it's attempted otestacking and it's really poor form
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)