Deletion of Nikki Catsouras

Comment: definitely #NEWS, and precisely what  was created for. The only possible justification for this article, aside from the brief media coverage, is that it provides a route to the real story and the tragic experience of the family for the 99% of people who only saw the gruesome photos (and I'm not looking now, but I think even Snopes omits the worst one). That's not encyclopedic, though, and itself leans on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: Sir: ''mea maxima culpa''. I can't believe I made such a huge mistake, linking to the correct guideline albeit using the technically incorrect alphabet. '''Move''' per  (links to the same exact guideline, but alphabetically correct
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Sorry to say.  As the nominator points out, the individual, in and of themselves, is not notable for any other reason than the circumstances of one event.  In that the one event cannot bestow otability|Notability as outlined in both otability|notable only for one event and OT#NEWS|and Wikipedia is not a news source, I regretfully say delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:NOT)