Deletion of 2014 Jerusalem tractor attack (2nd nomination)

Comment: per my rationale at the previous AFD: ''Fails  and  as reliable sources appear to have ceased talking about it a day or so after it happened. The fact that some seem to find it a cool and novel method of killing is not a reason to ignore our policies.'' I'll add that in our globalized Internet age + the 24-hour news cycle, it's really easy for something non-notable to get worldwide coverage, but if no one cares anymore two days later, it still doesn't pass our event notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS all the way. What ramification were there, that wouldn't have occurred with another similar crime. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Jerusalem tractor attack|last AFD was open for 16 days and was closed only on August 7th and this AFD was opened on October 4th less than month by the nom now indef blocked.Now nothing has changed from last nomination meets  and . Now the question of  it may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIVERSE||WP:GNG||WP:LASTING)

Comment: also per , notability is not temporary. Just because a certain subject is not mentioned every day in media after time passes doesnt take away its notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)