Deletion of Rutan & Tucker

Comment: though the nominator's comments are not far from the truth. The sources cited above confirm, ''"they exist and do business"'' but to me they confirm they have existed for quite some time and do big business with an often state or national focus. I would think this is the sort of law firm readers would ''expect'' us to have coverage of. We're not talking about an ice cream shop with 3 employees and just enough coverage to get them over the  line. It's a big firm with 150 attorneys and just enough coverage to get them over the  line
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I can understand the nomination's citation of  and ultimately I might agree.  On the other hand, this is the biggest law firm in the nation's sixth largest county, and plenty of potential sources exist (for example, 292 hits at latimes.com) if one wants to dig through the mostly routine materials for more substantive content
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)