Deletion of Regal Busways

Comment: Apart from all the sources already in the article, it is easy to find more such as the ''English Bus Handbook - Notable Independents''.  Our policy  therefore applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Fails NCOPR/GNG. , , etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES||WP:CORPSPAM)

Comment: or '''Draftify''' if {{u|Djm-leighpark}} wants to pick this up post lockdown) The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails . There are a lot of bus-company-related articles up for deletion recently and I think it might be better to create a "List of..." type article instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)