Deletion of Homeodynamic principle

Comment: This is not a hoax, and I have declined the speedy, because although most of the search results are obvious WP mirrors, these two references: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Baj8AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA43&lpg=PA43&dq=%22nathan+ackerman%22+homeodynamic&source=bl&ots=Hfo9Bui6pC&sig=xIqpHHis4y8IZFjS0Bxf1WxFIJE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ihGDVZr1KNXaoAT47bvADQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22nathan%20ackerman%22%20homeodynamic&f=false, http://www.basf.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Rodway-Chapter-2.pdf show that Ackerman did actually use this term. However, it evidently didn't catch on, so it is not |notable; and we should not redirect to Ackermann because Googling the word shows that it is now used with other meanings - so many and so diverse that I do not think a useful article is possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)