Deletion of A State of Mind (band) (2nd nomination)

Comment: I will note that I've reviewed the original deleted article and can confirm that it was ''not'' about the same band, so this is definitely not speediable. That said, this article makes no strong claim that ''this'' band passes  for anything, and cites no |reliable source coverage to support it — and I don't see David Gerard's new sources above as improving the notability case at all. It's a standard rule at AFD that because they represent the subject talking about ''themselves'', a Q&A-formatted ''interview'' cannot assist passage of GNG — it's a type of reference that can be used for ''supplementary'' sourcing of stray facts ''after'' GNG has ''already'' been passed, but not a type of reference that can ''bring'' GNG in and of itself. And the reviews are in a |blog and a |user-generated discussion forum, so they're not |reliable sources. And while France Info has the possibility of counting toward GNG, in ''this'' case it's just a blurb wrapped around a YouTube video of the band in performance rather than a piece of ''substantive'' coverage — and even if we did accept it as a GNG-eligible source because France Info, ''one'' GNG-eligible source is not a GNG ''pass'' all by itself. So no, nothing shown so far is enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC||WP:RS||WP:BLOGS||WP:USERG||WP:RS)