Deletion of JetBlue Flight 1416

Comment: per nom. I thought NTSB report would give it significance (along with passing GNG), but  is a strong argument here. No implications shown to anything in the future is something I should have connected the guideline with, but here we are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: while the subject of the AfD has received |significant coverage it is an event, and doesn't meet criteria set forth in  for retention as a stand alone article nor does the event has a |last effect. Therefore, while the incident can be included in a list of events regarding the type of aircraft (perhaps), as a single event it falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:AIRCRASH||WP:EFFECT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Burst of coverage in 2014. Some minor coverage of a lawsuit in 2018,https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/jetblue-passengers-sue-airline-4-years-emergency-landing-article-1.3880008 which for me is not sufficient for  coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)