Deletion of Huang Mulan (2nd nomination)

Comment: As the last AfD was so recent, there's no change in opinion so I'll repeat what I typed there; The All-China Women's Federation, ''Vision China Times'',  ''Yibada'' and ''GBTimes'' have extensive coverage of this person.http://m.womenofchina.cn/womenofchina/xhtml1/people/others/1607/202-1.htmhttp://www.visiontimes.com/2017/01/30/beautiful-spy-betrayed-by-the-communist-regime.htmlhttp://en.yibada.com/articles/193311/20170211/china-s-beautiful-agent-dies-110.htmhttps://gbtimes.com/renowned-chinese-agent-dies-aged-110.  The ''Journal of Modern Chinese History'' gave an extensive review of her autobiography as well as extensive biographical information.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17535654.2012.726862  And these are all just English language sources.  Most certainly much more exists in Chinese.  The nom needs to learn the basic tenants of Wikipedia:Notability.  As  states, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article.  If there's an issue of a controversial statement in the article that you believe needs sourcing, consider placing a citation-needed tag at the specific content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Passes . Special:Contributions/71.161.239.237|71.161.239.237
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and  as laid out by {{u|Zanhe}}. Adding Chinese sources would certainly improve article quality. In the meantime, fD is not cleanup|AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:ANYBIO||WP:A)

Comment: This article fails , and . There is no policy that being old is notable and nothing in the article is sourced, let alone sourced to independent reliable sources. I also agree with Legacypac's analysis of the autobiography and WIC as sources. Neither constitute a  as far as I can tell either, and should be disregarded
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE||WP:RS)

Comment: We've been over this quite recently and she's notable regardless of article quality.  Meets .  No compliance with efore, which sets forth an agenda and conditions precedent to doing a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:B||WP:AFD)