Deletion of Pankaj Chaturvedi - Dermatologist

Comment: per |G11. Basically written for the purposes of promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11)

Comment: per  (not qualified as it was speedy deleted before not via discussion) and . Third time is not the charm for this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4||WP:G11)

Comment: easily passes . The article has several references which independently discusses his career, life and work in fair depth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom. Lacks |significant coverage in independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: and  all three titles. Having been recreated with a third title after being speedily deleted per  twice is an instant and massive red flag. While I note that  for this version of the article {{diff2|1035928938|was declined}} by {{u|Bbb23}}, I consider this to be sufficient evidence for #14 ({{tq|Any other content wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|not suitable for an encyclopedia}}), specifically 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:G11||WP:G11||WP:DELREASON||WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: a major medical practitioner and has received significant press coverage, pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)