Deletion of Rachel Uchitel (2nd nomination)

Comment: I ran trough the sources, and i would point out that most of them just mention her name in the passing. I would conclude that the 9/11 and nightclub waitress parts in the biography are little more then a filler; The article's themselves detail the nightclub and the 9/1 aftermath, not Rachel Uchitel. That leaves us with the Tiger Woods issue. I would argue that the issue itself is absolutely notable, but i would equally point out that it is only notable because of the involvement of tiger woods. Therefor i would say that a mention in tiger woods article is more then sufficient to explain the situation. To conclude: I would cite  on this article, and i would point out that this article resembled a  where all non notable coverage attempts to cover up the 1E issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: When you take the "affair" out of the article you are left with a thoroughly unnotable person. It is therefore very much a  despite this article's attempts to play up other parts of the subject's biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Assuming the 9-11 coverage is ''de minimus'', she is still receiving coverage for this one event, so we don't know yet if there will not be long-lasting notablity. If this is not  closed as a keep, I would urge revisiting this in a year or so to see whether she truly is a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and the previous AFD, which ended in delete, since she hasn't become more notable since
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: The article has just been sourced with a |reliable from the NY Times which detailed a cancelled news conference about the alleged affair as reported by CBS News - both reputable news sources with editorial oversight. Additionally, the The Independent, a United Kingdom newspaper, has reported that Uchitel is the reason the "alleged affairs" became news. Please see: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/sport-on-tv-tiger-was-so-deeply-embedded-he-couldnt-see-woods-for-trees-2005509.html ''Sport on TV: Tiger was so deeply embedded he couldn't see Woods for trees'' www.independent.co.uk
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)