Deletion of List of jazz albums

Comment: per nom plus  and  as it says "only the best albums should be listed.  What one person or publication deems "the best" is different from another.  Plus if none of are red linked, then they should be categorized already.  Mr. C.C
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:OR)

Comment: WP:LIST, . ''If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion''. The lead sentence was rephrased (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_jazz_albums&diff=351385941&oldid=351346847), and the list is now a valid complement to :Category:Jazz albums
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: and/or '''move to "List of notable jazz albums".''' As an indiscriminate list, it isn't worth keeping.  However, with |attributions backing up each albums' notability, it is ''potentially'' a valuable resource.  I had proposed some criteria for inclusion in this list (see :Talk:List of jazz albums), and there had been some discussion at WP:JAZZ (see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jazz/Archives/2008_1#Jazz-L_100_project|here). |Red links have no place on any such list.  But I, for one, haven't had the time to put into this effort, and honestly, I am not sure when I would
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATTRIB||WP:RED)

Comment: personally I'm not a fan of big navigational lists (I prefer categories and templates) but some people like them and per Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates, having one does not preclude the others. Having said that the article should strive to include all Jazz Albums with an article not just those which have been |subjectively decided to be the "best" or "most important
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)