Deletion of Justice Kan Singh Parihar

Comment: I have gone through the article twice, but couldn't find any notability. A Chief Justice may be notable for the post but not a jugde. Also, being the VC of a university isn't inherently notable. What's more, the article fails  (by a wide margin),  (no verifiable sources given of the "claims"), and  (that includes all the service claims). Failing '''all''' the founding policies of Wikipedia, I have no doubt in saying "Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:NOR)

Comment: Justice Kan Singh Parihar has done great work for the rights of farmers of Rajasthan and for the common people. He is undoubtedly a notable person and meets notability criteria policy of wikipedia . A person becomes notable not just because of his high post but because of his great work and contribution to the society as a whole. Information on him is authentic and verifiable (Please see his web link and other information on him        http://www.justicekansingh.org
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: it's a really, ''really'' bad |non-neutral article, but that has little to do with deletion.  Slap a NPOV tag on it, or fix it.  I don't know enough about the Indian justice system to determine the level of his positions to determine notability, so no vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)