Deletion of Ariel Sokolovsky (2 nomination)

Comment: does not fit the criteria of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: there are actually '''''three notable sources''''' now on the page, two seperate pieces in the Jewish Week and one in Haaretz. Closing admin please note the religious fervour that is leading good editors to vote to delete an article that passed 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: We should be documenting crazy religious leaders and put them in a category together.  Btw, passes  due to a second source in google archive http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Ariel+Sokolovsky%22 and I'm quite sure I could find more if put a few more minutes into the effort
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: does not fit the criteria of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: nn failure of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Well done to Jayvdb for finding that source, there are probably more too as he said.  While this guy is insane, he now passes  and taking into account his broad infamy an article on him is now a must.  He passed  - case settled, period, end of story, life is too short.  Congratulations Rabbi Sokolovsky, you are now a ''notable'' crank
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: until such time as he is named the next Lubavitcher Rebbe. This is  at its height
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: Does not fit central criterion at . One article doth not notable make, especially when the BULK of the article is not about Sokolovsky, but the Lubavitcher Rebbe himself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)