Deletion of Punta Carnero (Ecuador)

Comment: It does seem to have significant coverage from independent secondary sources, http://books.google.com/books?id=zjxO1tW8XcAC&pg=PT851&dq=%22Punta+Carnero%22&hl=en&ei=vGhDTp38NOPXiALH9cm0Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Punta%20Carnero%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=DivHNxaDfJkC&pg=PA314&dq=%22Punta+Carnero%22&hl=en&ei=vGhDTp38NOPXiALH9cm0Ag&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Punta%20Carnero%22&f=false thus passing . Reading more like an advert is a matter of editing, not deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Both of those are travel guides. It's not surprising that a beach would be listed in a book like that, but I don't think  covers every single attraction commonly listed in a travel guide. I've already merged relevant material into Salinas, Ecuador; I'm not seeing why a beach needs it's own article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)