Deletion of Tiffany Williamson (2nd nomination)

Comment: article seems to assert ''some'' notability, but the subject fails . She seems only notable for that one event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: She has not recieved significant coverage. The aforementioned links revolved around the media finding an interesting story about an African-American woman attorney in a poker tournament. The story is very interesting, but that doesn't casue her to meet the notability requiremtns of . All the coverage revolved around one event, i.e. ''a classic ''. Not every semi-interesing person meets the wp:bio requirements becasue of some media coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: She plainly meet ... http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/8567118/site/21683474/ Assciated Press/MSNBC, http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2005/jul/14/worldseriesofpoker the Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2005/jul/13/worldseriesofpoker.barryglendenning twice, http://www.wmalumni.com/magazine/wint_0506/alumnews_5.shtml plus this, http://www.guidetopoker.com/Tiffany-Williamson.php and this and innumerable other online references that can be summed up as "worst poker player in the history of the universe".  Notability doesn't need to be for skill.  '''A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.'''  Slam dunk, if reluctant, keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)