Deletion of List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters

Comment: Article does not violate , and nominator has not explained why they think it does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: Does not seem to violate .  |Reliable sources exist on this subject matter.  They may not be reflected in the article, but per  "If an article currently does not cite reliable secondary sources, that does not necessarily mean that its topic is not notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: |Rreference tables are permitted, but all we have here are |indexes and annotations compiled from |primary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: There is no |evidence to suggest that any of this content is |notable either as a group or individually. It seems to me that this list or article fails, at best, OT#DIR or, at worst, . All of this content comes directly from Dungeons & Dragons publications, and the question must be asked, why reproduce it all here? Is Wikipedia to be used as a supplementary source for the publications of Wizards of the Coast? I think
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: The page needs references, but otherwise it seems to be a reasonable list of where and how the information about D&D monsters was published. Given that, I can't see how it violates  - if nothing else, it should easily fit as a bibliography for people interested in the subject matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)