Deletion of Title 15 of the United States Code

Comment: apparently just ikistalking by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: If nothing can be written about this on its own, perhaps we could create a category of everything in title 15 of the united states code, or of sections of the united states code.  Perhaps an article on the subject is warranted, but this is not even close to what a good start would be.  The external links belong in those articles, not in a list (Wikipedia being |not a directory or list of links, |useful or otherwise).  I think that if this were to happen with, say, Mexican or Ethiopian law, someone would give more or less this exact argument, and we need to be careful of |systemic bias.  I don't think the order in which the wikipedia articles (the only appropriate constituent of this list) is overly important in and of itself, and so a category would be just fine.  Additionally, if this is a |list it should be named accordingly.  Finally, there being other such pages is not usually a good reason to keep this particular one unless those were voted to be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:USEFUL||WP:BIAS||WP:LIST)

Comment: obviously. United_States_Code#Titles|Every other section of the United States Code, has an identical linkfarm, and for good reason; because it's useful. I thought  was a lame and misguided personal essay when it was written, and I still think it's a lame and misguided personal essay now; our ''primary purpose'' is to be useful. How is cut-and-pasting a great glob of federal legislation into Wikipedia (which would seem the only viable alternative to this article) going to improve the encyclopedia in any way?&nbsp;–&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: This isn't just a list of external links, it's also (and more importantly) a list of ''Wikipedia articles''.  This is a really easy way to see how our articles about U.S. law are organized under the United States Code.  You could have a different list (and maybe we do?) with the articles organized chronologically, or whatever, but this set of pages is important to have.  Not quite a |list, not quite a |disambiguation page, but who cares?  We need this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:DISAMBIG)

Comment: obviously. The earlier attempt at speedy deletion and this current AfD are part of this editor's ongoing pattern of disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Most of his edits revolve around POV-pushing attempts to annoy me and others by wikilawyering. This editor is a  here to promote Centre for Addiction and Mental Health|his coworkers and sexology|their work, and to annoy and discredit their offsite critics (which includes me). This behavior is now apparently leaking over into deleting info from ANY of the 1000 or so articles I started, not just the few about his buddies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)