Deletion of Richmond City Council (Richmond, California)

Comment: Meets . reliable sources are available  We have room for the article 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEXIST||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: Really, this should be no more than a couple of paragraphs in Richmond, California— which it already is. There's no real need for articles on the councilmembers and then repeating material from them here; as a rule politicians at that level have been held not notable unless they achieved some level of notoriety which went beyond routine local media coverage, which BTW is exactly what the citations look like. I'm also concerned about what looks like a great deal of  in the portrayal here of the various members: I think you would be hard-pressed to find a genuinely secondary source which is making the kind of analysis which I see in this writing, which BTW is a potential problem in the politics section of the main article. It does not come across as a widely-accepted history of things, but as someone's synthesis of daily news articles from the SF and Berkeley papers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)