Deletion of Nathaniel Adam Briggs

Comment: I have tagged this article for |rescue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:ARS)

Comment: not enough to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Sorry, not notable - which means, not recognized or written about by independent reliable sources (see  and ). Looking at the references in the article: one, the only detailed one, is from a less-than-one-year-old quarterly supplement to a small regional newspaper; one is actually an op-ed or letter to the editor written BY the subject; and one is a blog article which describes the subject's efforts to land a job as a CIO. (If he is such a notable tycoon, why is he trolling for a job as a CIO? And is he hoping to point to this Wikipedia article to support his job search?) As for Vator it's a directory-type listing, presumably self-supplied. Not a single eliable source among them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:R)

Comment: I don't understand why you guys are saying that it doesn't meet notability standards, per . There is a significant amount of coverage in the sources that establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)