Deletion of Robert Woodhead

Comment: Co-creator of the early Wizardry games meets item 3 of  as established with this coverage in a http://books.google.com/books?id=HJNvZLvpCEQC&pg=PA155&dq=%22Robert+Woodhead%22&hl=en&ei=VFRuTb-0LYP_8Aay1rXpDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Robert%20Woodhead%22&f=false book about computer games.  Covered also in the http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=nhgiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=3KUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1754,3384958&dq=robert-woodhead+wizardry&hl=en Montreal Gazette, and http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=o0ZWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=E-sDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4370,6146833&dq=robert-woodhead+wizardry&hl=en Eugene Register-Guard.  His creation of Virex is documented in this article from http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=SoZGAAAAIBAJ&sjid=dzMNAAAAIBAJ&pg=3512,1187905&dq=robert-woodhead+wizardry&hl=en The Evening News
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: A conflict of interest is no grounds for deletion, and I don't understand why you beleive he fails point 3 of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Although this is an autobiography, I see no issue with it failing to meet a |neutral point of view
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)