Deletion of Amy (demon)

Comment: into list. Nothing here that asserts individual notability, but a list of these demons looks appropriate. Though I'm not sure  is the right thing to talk about here...that guideline is for ''people'', you know...but individually Amy probably does not pass . So listify
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: fails  and definitely fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:BULLSHIT)

Comment: The nomination is essentially an "I've never heard of it" argument.  I do believe that the list of stubs related to demons has gotten a bit excessive, but this is valid, verified information (and fairly well known in the circles familiar with the references cited) and should not simply be deleted.  I think Demons in Goetia could be an alternative in the event of a merge, which would allow for slightly more information (such as is contained in this stub) to be provided above a mere list.  Such a list, by the way, would be superfluous, since the list is already there in the Goetia article, which I assume those who voted for deletion based on  and the like seem to have missed. To single out one of these listed and sourced 72 for deletion doesn't seem reasonable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: I think it would be best to shove this into another article/list until some sources (i.e. not online demon libraries with the apparent intent to market their products) and it doesn't fail . Until then, I still vote delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:CB)