Deletion of Michael Dickson (engineer)

Comment: Indeed, the CBE has always been held to satisfy  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: and close  - per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Shoddy nomination, does not appear to have followed . Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering should be enough for notability by itself, as should the presidency of the Institution of Structural Engineers. CBE is also usually considered enough (although the two lower orders OBE and MBE are not).  It's merely informational, not promotional, to list the significant awards and fellowships that the subject of an article has attained. And there's nontrivial coverage of him e.g. http://www.nce.co.uk/who-how-and-why-he-got-there/530675.article here and https://www.istructe.org/journal/volumes/volume-83-(published-in-2005)/issues/issue-18/articles/profile-michael-dickson-cbe-shaping-the-world here. The article is badly sourced but that's a reason for cleanup, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)