Deletion of Victor C. X. Wang

Comment: Can't find any notable mentions in third party publications. Merely being a published author, even one who has written several textbooks and numerous journal articles, is insufficient to establish notability under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Wang has added a reference to being Editor-in-Chief of the ''International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology'' to his page.http://old.igi-global.com/journals/details.asp?ID=32914&v=mission  However, as the relevant section of  states "The person is or has been an editor-in-chief of a major '''well-established''' journal in their subject area", and this journal started in 2010 and appears to have published only one quarterly issue, I'm not changing my stance. I can't imagine a journal being any ''less'' well-established and still actually existing.  Perhaps in a year, though, there may be sufficient notability if the journal prospers.  If the author wants to move the article to userspace until then, I'd definitely support that—although, given http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cxw888#It.27s_not_your_article his behavior in editing the article so far, that may not be an option for long
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Given that even though he was cited for edit-warring on this page, {{User|Cxw888}} is still editing away on his own page, has not responded to any messages left on his talk page, has blatantly ignored the notices on the article (e.g., don't delete the AfD template), and hasn't bothered responding here... I suspect that if the article is deleted, he his highly likely to try recreating it in short order.  Therefore, I suggest that if the AfD outcome is "delete", the page should be |salted to avoid further edit-warring
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: Does not meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ACAD)