Deletion of Magnetospheric eternally collapsing object

Comment: Non-notable far fringe theory. It's the pet of 3 or 4 guys, the very definition of ''an extremely small (or vastly limited) minority'' per . The article looks like it's referenced but it isn't; practically all of the references are to the theory's tiny circle of proponents. Despite lack of notability a heavily revised article could be useful as a debunking (see also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT||WP:SNARK)

Comment: I'm sorry, but after seeing the phrase "MECO's are not a widely-accepted concept" too many alarm bells went off. This smacks of |original research unsupported by |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: per  - there are plenty of refs. Besides the refs listed on the page, the most creditable ''website'' ref I could find was http://space.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn9620&feedId=online-news_rss20 this, but http://books.google.com/books?q=Magnetospheric+Eternally+Collapsing+Object&btnG=Search+Books gbooks has even more: http://books.google.com/books?id=3-NUcobTM1kC&pg=PA498&dq=Magnetospheric+Eternally+Collapsing+Object&ei=mloOSePgCYy4yASHhPw_, http://books.google.com/books?id=QE8wAv-G2PQC&pg=PA31&dq=Magnetospheric+Eternally+Collapsing+Object&ei=mloOSePgCYy4yASHhPw_, http://books.google.com/books?id=Dy_6gr76QmkC&pg=PA91&dq=Magnetospheric+Eternally+Collapsing+Object&ei=mloOSePgCYy4yASHhPw_, http://books.google.com/books?id=aDxb_VHMrGcC&pg=PA1&dq=Magnetospheric+Eternally+Collapsing+Object&ei=mloOSePgCYy4yASHhPw_#PPA1,M1 (whole chapter in a book for this link), and a ~15 more over http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Magnetospheric+Eternally+Collapsing+Object&btnG=Search here at gScholar. Not to mention the article is well written and informative. However, I would like to see a '''criticism''' section included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)