Deletion of Rape of Rawalpindi

Comment: The article is no longer a one liner stub and nominator seems to be have mistaken as the article is clearly  because  states that ''To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term. ''. We cannot dismiss a wp:N|notable historical subject from 1947 such as this article as neologism when we not only have several books discussing about the topic https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Rape+of+Rawalpindi%22 but even have a book exclusively on this subject with the same title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTNEO||WP:NOTNEO)

Comment: This one is weird. The topic being discussed is unquestionably notable. The name, however, may be a neologism invented as the title of a book by one academic or small group of academics. Personally, I'm over my head trying to figure it out. Can we get a neutral expert to tell us if there's another more |common name for this historical event(s)? If this is the common name, keep it; if not, move to the common name
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)