Deletion of Kambrya College

Comment: a major high school which, despite being relatively new, still has sources that meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Being a secondary school in itself is an assertion of notability.  Being "one of the largest single campus schools in Victoria" is a rather grand assertion of notability.  Besides that |consensus has consistently kept high/secondary schools, the sources, like that of ''The Age'', confirm notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: as notable school - two sources from Melbourne Age are both passes for  and therefore passes . I should add that The Age is lets say the Melbourne equivalent of The New York Times. The article is definitely a keeper in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: The article is similar to many other school articles, lacking in independent references and making no attempt to assert notability (other than stating its existence).  However, the sources provided by cab in this case actually make a case for notability.  This is '''not''' a run-of-the mill State High School and it may be possible to write an informative, encyclopedic article on this school.  Note: the fact that sources are available for this school has no bearing on the likelihood of sources being found for other schools and the the fact that this school is notable does not mean all schools are notable.  All articles on schools need to be individually assessed against 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)