Deletion of Characters of Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines (2nd nomination)

Comment: Article does not have any reliable third-party sources to meet the  or  requirements. Google search only reveals trivial mentions of the characters, or unreliable sources. Keep voters and article authors have not discharged their 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:BURDEN)

Comment: due to failure to |cite |reliable sources in contravention of the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Per |lack of reliable sources and |original research. Also Wikipedia is  a game guide or a collection of trivia. No improvement whatsoever to the pointed-out lack of sourcing in the first AFD 8 months ago. Roi must have read a different article from the one being discussed here, in terms of lack of demonstrated notability and  presence of original research , or has a different understanding of the use of those terms in Wikipedia than the consensus of most editors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NOT)

Comment: per #PLOT. The present article is entirely plot summary, and as such inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you have independent sources on real-world aspects, then ''first'' the main article on the game should be expanded using these sources (it could really use some!), and only if this is not possible, breaking out a "subarticle" should be considered. (And even then, the concept of this subarticle should be radically different from what it is now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)