Deletion of Natalia Starr

Comment: per : ''"Tabloid or yellow journalism is usually considered a poor basis for an encyclopedia article, due to the lack of fact checking inherent in sensationalist and scandal mongering news reporting. Per policy, Wikipedia is not for scandal mongering or gossip.''" This is '''policy''', not any odd guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SENSATION)

Comment: Passes  with significant coverage in reliable mainstream Polish media. Some of the sources are in the tabloid format, which does not degrade their reliability. Some "delete" votes above are confusing Tabloid (newspaper format) with Tabloid journalism, which aren't the same thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Irn's rationale. These porn AfDs are becoming increasingly lazy. "Fails GNG" when there is clearly some claim to notability. How about explaining ''why'' it fails GNG? Notability is demonstrated as per the Polish sources and I am sure other refs could be found if we looked. Deleting this would be as silly as deleting Puma Swede, who just like Natalia Starr may not be notable in the U.S., but is definitely notable in Sweden. World wide fame is not a criteria of , as far as I know
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , , and . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)