Deletion of The Venus Project

Comment: I am more inclined to merge/redirect to Jacque Fresco or vice versus.  Each individually is marginal at best under the otability|Notability guidelines, as shown here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22The+Venus+Project%22+economics&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8, and here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Jacque+Fresco%22+The+Venus+Project&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8.  However, together, I believe they meet the standards.  Thanks
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: No evidence that it is notable independent of the film. Otherwise fails 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to Jacque Fresco for reasons by ShoesssS above.  Each article individually is marginal at best under the otability|Notability guidelines as pointed out above in google search on both. Fresco is mostly notable for being himself in interviews... talk shows, etc.- Incorporating Venus Project into Jacque Fresco makes the most sense to me. Mostly it appears that all of the connected information revolves around Fresco and his opinions, and yes it does appear to be a money making business. It may be that Widefox above is correct in saying their self published information is an advert for a corporation. Mention of Zeitgeist Addendum would be included in a new Jacque Fresco/Venus Project  merge article. Merging into Zeitgeist Addendum only, would take away from an older bit of information as to Fresco and Venus project which for better or worse have been around for some time. For that reason I think it is a bad idea to merge with Zeitgeist Addendum which may be trying to gain notability from Fresco... and not the other way around
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to  Zeitgeist: Addendum) No evidence that it is notable. It is an advert for a corporation, that fails 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)