Deletion of Further Confusion (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article includes a list of multiple reliable secondary sources as references; they just aren't properly used as in-line citations. It clearly needs improvement, but notability appears to exist and is . Beyond the 2005-era references mentioned in the article, but it was https://kotaku.com/5978236/my-weekend-at-a-furry-convention given in-depth international coverage in 2013, https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/01/17/furcon-silicon-valleys-last-best.html analyzed for its economic influence on Silicon Valley in 2014, http://www.insideedition.com/headlines/9697-what-really-goes-on-at-a-furries-convention given a nationwide exposé in 2015, https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Apple-Moves-Annual-Developer-Conference-to-San-Jose-414025363.html mentioned as a driver of the San Jose economy in 2017... AfD is not cleanup, and it sounds like the nominator didn't adequately search for sources  nominating. I found those stories in about 30 seconds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I just searched 'Further Confusion' and the Furcon official website came up as the first result, does in fact meet . The only real issue I came across after reading the article was a lack of inline citations which is easy cleanup and doesn't at all constitute deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)