Deletion of Aleksandra Dranka

Comment: to  List of Polish supercentenarians. I do not see why age would make someone worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, particularly given ,  and such. However, I do think that a list of oldest people is acceptable, and further, it should be expanded to provide short biographical notes. Therefore, my merge vote is not just a simple redirect, but I'd also expect to see the content of that article, including a picture, added there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to List of Polish supercentenarians.  Subject does not satisfy the general notability guidelines with significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources per .  If members of WikiProject Oldest Persons insist on continuing to create stubs for objectively non-notable persons in the absence of significant coverage, on the sole basis of age or status as the "oldest person in geographic area X, then I expect this is headed for a Wikipedia-wide RfC that will clarify and tighten the notability guidelines with respect to such claims.  There is absolutely no reason why most of these persons cannot be noted as a one- or two-sentence entry in a "List of oldest persons in X" article, or "List of Xish supercentenarians" article.  '''I also suggest that the redirect be protected to prevent re-creation of this article contrary to consensus
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: with List of Polish supercentenarians. Sources in the article indicate she meets . If not kept as a standalone, a small biography could be created on the Polish supercentenarians page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or merge. Satisfies . It does not matter that the overall life was mundane; as long as we have multiple coverage of her "sense of humor" or whatever in national news, it means she is nationally notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)