Deletion of Swearing-in ceremony of Narendra Modi

Comment: Agree with the nom, does not qualify for a stand-alone article. Delete per  and . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:INTHENEWS)

Comment: Clearly meets our |event notability criteria, an inauguration/swearing-in of the HoG in the world's largest democracy should take care of that, but even beyond that basic point, we have sufficient coverage about the uniqueness and notability of this particular swearing in courtesy of the NYT, WP, The Guardian, The Times, Sydney Morning Herald etc etc in addition to the excessive coverage in Indian media. And of course, the fact that it was even broadcast live in Pakistan with running commentary is of greater significance, not to mention that Stephen P. Cohen has been giving tv interviews on this left, right, and center. It is quite silly to say that an inauguration/swearing-in gains notability based on the number of balls or concerts held or the designer for the clothes worn. Not news is an argument taken to absurd extremes as the nom seems to think that the I-P or I-SL issues contribute less to notability than a performance by James Taylor. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: The topic meets the |event notability criteria: widespread international coverage, complete with analysis by political and international relations experts.  is applicable when the article contains news-like updates, announcements, daily happenings etc. Multiple non-Indian sources (e.g. http://www.smh.com.au/world/narendra-modi-to-be-sworn-in-as-indias-pm-in-historic-ceremony-20140526-zroxc.html The Sydney Morning Herald and http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/26/world/asia/india-modi-inauguration/ CNN) have called the event historic. "''If this article is allowed to exist...''" is a slippery slope argument: if another such ceremony is not notable, an article on it will be deleted. Besides, I don't see how can we blame this article for starting a trend, when Wikipedia already has :Category:United States presidential inaugurations|70+ articles on the various US presidential inaguarations. This event is certainly more important and more historic than most of its US counterparts. To quote CNN: "''For the first time, leaders of an entire South Asian region attended, including Nawaz Sharif, the prime minister of India's traditional archrival, Pakistan. But it's not just the guest list that makes this inauguration historic. Never in the past three decades has a political party taken up the reins of the world's largest democracy with an absolute majority.''" As for {{tl|Infobox historical event}}, that template is just a redirect to {{tl|Infobox event}} -- I don't see what the problem is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: for passing  and has been described as a "major diplomatic event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)