Deletion of Pauline Barnett

Comment: This improved article still fails  because the subject lacks sustained  of her life or career, and her "fame" revolves around  - an award from the Queen of Britain. As notability is not , there is no reason to hold this particular royal honor as an automatic grant of notability anymore then we would a 100th birthday card from the Queen (and yes, I know that is more common then this award, but my point still stands
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I have added a couple of sources to the article. I don't see why the award would not qualify for  - it's a national award, not a local one, and there were 10 recipients of that award each year, in a population of about 60 million overall. Assuming that about 3/4 of the population were aged 20+, the award was given to 10 in 45,000,000 people, or 2.22%, which is surely notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Even though this article has been improved since nomination, I don't see any notability. Doesn't pass  and I think this article falls under  as well - not even a notable business associated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)