Deletion of MacMahon family

Comment: Per {{u|postdlf}}, a lack of articles doesn't automatically mean a lack of notability. (Otherwise, if the project already has an article on everything that is, or ever will be, notable, then we might as well just disable the "create article" button :) ). Jokes and deliberate exaggerations aside, I would note that, while it is true to say that we currently only have an article on one MacMahon family member in the EN project (i.e there is only one member of :Category:MacMahon family|the related/primary category in English), there are articles on multiple MacMahon family members in the FR project (i.e. there are about 10 members of :fr:Catégorie:Famille de Mac-Mahon|the equivalent category in French). And it is perhaps unsurprising that the various holders of the titles of 'Marquis d'Éguilly' and 'Duc de Magenta' are better covered in the FR project. Per . Anyway, while the sources in the article could certainly be bulked-up (to better establish notability of the subject/family as a whole), I don't think that "only one family member meets the criteria" is a viable argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:WORLDVIEW)

Comment: The family https://archive.org/stream/almanachdegotha00unse_94#page/450/mode/2up was listed in the ''Almanach de Gotha'' which I think means they are notable ''as a family''. And as Guiliolopez says, just because some individuals are red links doesn't mean they always will be. The second Marquis was created a peer of France in 1827 so would meet , and he and his brother Maurice-François were both general officers so would meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:SOLDIER)