Deletion of Star jelly

Comment: per above, and |our fringe theory rules.  It does not violate |our rules on making an undue synthesis, as much of it is exact quotes.  If anything, it needs copyediting.  This nomination is another of the "|I'm embarrassed" variety
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:SYNTH||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: This is ''not'' a case of undue synthesis. Instead it describes a lot of cases of what is generally termed ''star jelly'' by outside sources. The article doesn't claim anything novel/unique/unciteable using external sources — as is typical for . Otherwise the article is a little unstructured and the topic is IMHO very weird, but there's nothing in it that would make it subject to deletion, irrespective of the article topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)