Deletion of Computer Simulation Technology (2nd nomination)

Comment: Guiding criteria here is  which asks for significant coverage in secondary sources. There don't appear to be any at the moment -- even that Yahoo Finance piece at the bottom of the reflist is just a press release. If kept the article needs to be edited mercilessly to excise promotional material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: nbsp; I'm not the best choice of an editor to explain how to interpret the thousands of citations found at WP:BEFORE, but I know how to read the article and click on the Wikilink that tells me that the parent company is .&nbsp; As for the WP:DEL12 argument, I researched one of the the product names and that is the name of the product.&nbsp; If there is some WP:MOS rule that allows product names to be down-cased, it could be cited, but it is not reasonable that an obscure MOS rule is evidence of promotionalism.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)