Deletion of Harry Potter film/book differences

Comment: per Erik and Bignole.  I've long felt iffy about this series of articles, but what it comes down to is that these articles are |original research by synthesis.  It's a great place for nitpicky Harry Potter fans to compare and contrast trivial chunks of passages with the corresponding movie, but it has absolutely no encyclopedic value.  I would also argue that it borders on  and #INFO violations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:TRIVIA||WP:NOT)

Comment: However, I would like to see the differences linked to sources. For now, it looks a little like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Per Wikipedia is not for |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: As ''Harry Potter'' is one of the most successful series and franchises, the differences between the books and the films have received much coverage in the mainstream media, from film critics and fans.  These articles cover a notable topic, in addition to being well-written and well-organized.  The articles may need more sources and references, and those can be found and added.  I would not consider the current state of these articles to be ; all the information presented is directly taken from the books and the films.  The articles do not analyze any of the differences or draw any of their own conclusions; all the information is factual.  It is verifiable and does not promote any particular point of view.  These pages are a good resource for Wikipedia readers researching film adaptions or the Harry Potter series
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: because these articles are written with original research.  The topics fail |notability standards because there is no independent, significant coverage from sources other than the editors themselves.  Without this coverage, the editors are able to take it upon themselves to report any difference, major or minor, resulting in a compilation of indiscriminate information which has ''zero'' encyclopedic bearing.  It is very obvious that when one medium is translated into another, many items will change for conventional or creative reasons.  What ''should'' be reported in an encyclopedic context are explanations ''why'' the changes were made, because these differences will have real-world context.  These articles have zero real-world context and fail notability standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)