Deletion of New Cinema History

Comment: Once again I see people arguing in a deletion discussion that there's no coverage of a topic, and then I search and find... There are academic articles about New Cinema History here.http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue11/ArticleBiltereystandMeers.pdfhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01439685.2012.699625?src=recsys&journalCode=chjf20 It features in the Oxford Dictionary of Film Studies (although New Film History is the main title with New Cinema History an alternative).https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZxcVXI-AwkUC&lpg=PA284&ots=SDJ9GYkBTr&dq=%22new%20cinema%20history%22%20film%20studies&pg=PA284#v=onepage&q=%22new%20cinema%20history%22%20film%20studies&f=false Richard Maltby probably is notable himself per  as holder of a named professorship at a reasonably distinguished institution (Flinders Uni).https://www.digitalcinemastudies.com/richard-maltby His best known book, Hollywood Cinema, was published in 1995 so there's a lack of reviews onlinehttp://www.jstor.org/stable/20688474?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents, though he seems widely citedhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/298483919_Explorations_in_New_Cinema_History_Approaches_and_Case_Studies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as a suitable sourced stub with thanks for |the research by {{u|Colapeninsula}} showing coverage enough for a stub. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Colapeninsula#Researcher.27s_Barnstar '''Kudos
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I am not seeing the substantial coverage independent of Maltby which would be needed for an article. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)