Deletion of Poison In The Grapes

Comment: for failing . I have no pony in this race.  The 15-minute documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eFBP5Adt0Y exists and can be watched and does relate to a superfund site and public safety issues in Akron, the film was mentioned and filmmaker did speak up on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yU8gSJZ7Llg WEWS News Channel 5 in Cleveland, but '''sorry Matthew'''... Wikipedia is |not an ADVOCATE of even the worst situations even if its editors may have cause to be alarmed at government irresposibility, but a short documentary film has problems when it is not covered more widely in what Wikipedia considers |reliable sources.  While the film itself fails inclusion guidelines, the situation at the site itself is sourcable and has recived coverage,https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yU8gSJZ7Llghttp://www.newsnet5.com/money/consumer/troubleshooter/akron-residents-have-concerns-about-neighborhood-epa-superfund-site-security so perhaps it can be List of Superfund sites in Ohio|redirected someplace where it can be mentioned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:RS)

Comment: I can't find enough out there to show that this film would pass notability guidelines. As far as the claims here go, I'd recommend against making accusations of harassment since I really can't see where these claims are founded. I also doubt very seriously that Wikimedia will step in here and keep this article, especially given the  attacks made here against various editors. That it's implied (albeit not outright stated) that they'll do this because you live in a building with several of them doesn't really help you either. Basically, at this point you're doing more to discredit the film and its director than anything else. It also comes across as incredibly unprofessional on his side. As someone who came in here without knowing anything about the director or film, this gives more credence to RedDogSix's claims of non-notability than anything else. It's very, very rare that a notable film or person would have to come into an article and resort to the actions done here. I'd like to ask that you please stop. This AfD will be part of a permanent record on Wikipedia that random people will have the ability to view. A potential investor coming in to look at the director's history will not be impressed by this. Also, I have to point out the irony in the last few fairly abusive posts in response to Schmidt's delete argument. He's probably one of the biggest inclusionists (not that this is a bad thing, mind you) on Wikipedia and will argue vociferously for many articles. For him to argue for deletion is a very, very strong statement towards the film's lack of notability per Wikipedia's guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:ADHOMINEM)

Comment: Fails to meet , ; nothing on Google Scholar for either workhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Poison+In+The+Grapes%22 or directorhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Matthew+Berdyck%22 (as opposed to say, John Pilger https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22John+Pilger%22 and his Cambodia documentaryhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Year+Zero%3A+the+Silent+Death+of+Cambodia%22, for example). Has no awards, recognition, nor run in major festivals etc. Fails a basic Google test (all SEO, nothing independent) so claim of ''"get national media attention"'' falls flat at best. I'm sure the |COI IP thinks they're important, too bad no one else seems to share the sentiment and that's why there is no {{underlined|significant}} coverage for the work. Wikipedia in an encyclopedia with inclusion criteria, this fails to meet even the most basic of them. As for what seems like a THREAT and WIKIBULLYING to get their way with ''"If I want media I can have media.  This is all going to back fire on you."'': be my guest. I '''{{underlined|love}}''' hearing about myself; make sure to mention me by name. ;) But it will most likely not end the way you think it will (and if there was actual media coverage, the point would be moot anyway). --&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILM||WP:COI)

Comment: This 15 minute YouTube film comprehensively fails both the |General Notability Guidelines and the  alternative criteria . Whether it is speedy deleted of deleted per this discussion, the title needs to be salted as was Matthew Berdyck. For background see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_March_25&oldid=648063026#Review_of_Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation.2FMatthew_Berdyck this, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_March_25&oldid=648063026#The_credibility_of_Imdb. this, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_March_27#Poison_in_the_Grapes this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FILM)