Deletion of MBJ London

Comment: per nom. Apart from the promotional sources in the article, a basic  shows little to no non-PR or non-PR-initiated coverage in es apart from passing mentions (there's one PR-initiated story about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WB21|WB21 that drops their name). No indication of organic third-party coverage, which strongly suggests they're not actually noteworthy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:RS)