Deletion of National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago

Comment: national government entities are presumably notable. For smaller nations and non-English speaking nations we should also consider that online sources will be necessarily slim; see . Given time such articles are sourceable, because the country (and its institutions) aren't going anywhere
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: per .  I find it impossible to believe that Wikipedia would delete an article about the most central repository of primary documents for an entire nation.  That said, a few more references (preferably line-item citations) are certainly called for.  Only one reference is extremely poor form
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: This is a country's ''national archives'' and a major government agency - surely this is notable! Government agencies are almost always considered inherently notable, which I guess is why they are not mentioned in . The United Nations agency UNESCO considers the Eric Williams and Derek Walcott Collections at NAT&T to be of worldwide significance.http://www.unesco.org/webworld/mdm/register/. The article is under referenced I agree, cut out the unreferenced parts, but I don't agree it needs deletion, and a lack of response from the Caribbean WikiProject is not a good reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)