Deletion of A.T.M JEFF (2nd nomination)

Comment: Y'know, I've never seen an AfD with a flood of sock/meatpuppets voting Keep where the subject ''was'' notable--- it's almost a solid enough indicator of non-notability to form a deletion rationale in of itself.  But in the wave of blogs, obscure webpages, press releases,  coverage and non-notable awards, there's just one little thing missing in the article: substantial coverage of the subject in multiple, published, reliable sources.  You'd think, for one, that an artist based out of Perth who was remotely notable would've been featured in The West Australian, which is Perth's daily newspaper.  He's not. https://www.google.com/search?as_q=&as_epq=A.T.M+JEFF&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=thewest.com.au&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: fails WP:MUSICBIO. in my several years experience in WP, the swarming of desperate |single purpose editors is a clear indicator that the subject is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: can't find evidence of meeting  or . Awards received are nowhere near "relatively major". Call me cynical, but some of the previous votes seem a little suspicious
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC)