Deletion of Nice guy syndrome (second nomination)

Comment: per  and the reasoning of Catamorphism, this is nothing more than "pseudoscience masquerading as a legitimate concept (the low quality of the sources cited should be enough of a clue there.) Having an article on this implies that "nice guy syndrome" is an objectively recognizable concept like "cancer" or "schizophrenia". It's not. The idea that such a "syndrome" exists is a hypothesis floated in a few popular books, and we shouldn't legitimize it; at best, it could be mentioned in an article on folk psychological theories or on the sociology of heterosexual relationships in the US
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: almost completely |unsourced and similarly almost all |original research and outright speculation. I've been trying to tag all the unsourced material. If we went through and removed it we'd be left with maybe two sentences in the article. Despite OR, NPOV, and citation needed tags, the article remains unimproved and should be removed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: hella |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: fails  and fails to assert any verification in medical or psychiatry journals (only source is from a US university that is not defining any legitimacy as a medical condition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: However, I disagree strongly with the nom; there is such a thing as the "Nice guy syndrome", whether it's documented or not. Until we can build an article from sources, delete the article we do have. There's too much |original research in the present one to save it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)