Deletion of 12oz Prophet

Comment: as a failure to meet the criteria of .  A ''net'' income of $1.4billion... man I want a piece of that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Do you have any |reliable sources to back up your claims? Also, I have no idea what you mean about it being two years since "be penilized
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: We've provided more than enough to meet . We've provided the names of magazines that have whole articles on either 12ozprophet, 4thw, or AKA. We're not going to provide links to the articles, because they are in PAPER form. Back before the internet, we used paper goods to distribute information. These are not ONLINE magazines. We've provided WAY more than we had to. And you're continuing this because you lost the argument and don't want to admit it. There sources are easily varifiable. Go out and buy one of any of those magazines, And that's just within the last 18 months. Being the first to feature the Os Gemeos twins, should be BEYOND enough notability. As if changing how people look at graff zines wasn't enough. Give this up man, we've provided more than enough info for you, the article is changed. Give it up. -Grits —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: To the 12oz Prophet users who are arguing to keep the article, please read  and tell us how your site meets the notability guidelines set in that article, because from what I can see, the article makes no attempt to show how it does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)