Deletion of The Georgetown Improv Association (2nd nomination)

Comment: Most of the reliable sources are about upcoming shows, e.g., "Georgetown Improv Association presents ..."http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-community-calendar-april-19-to-26-2012/2012/04/17/gIQA1yxCTT_story_3.html Washington Post April 21, 2012 I did find "{{cite news|page= |newspaper= WKRN-TV|ABC 2 WKRN-TN |date=August 24, 2010|section= |title=ABC News 2 at 6 |author= |accessdate=September 23, 2012|url=http://www.livedash.com/transcript/wheel_of_fortune-(college_week)/714/KGO/Tuesday_August_24_2010/421293/}}." Another one that may have some bearing on the topic (not much) is "{{cite news|page=C1 |newspaper= Washington Post |date=January 13, 2008|section=Metro |title=Pre-Prank Publicity Doesn't Stop Pants-Free Metro Ride |author= Dan Zak|accessdate=September 23, 2012|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/12/AR2008011202638.html |no-tracking=yes}}" The one article that actually provides several sentences on the topic,http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-68065704.html Washington Times December 16, 2000 notes "Georgetown University offers its students the Georgetown Players Improv Group. Georgetown also hosts an "improvfest" each spring, for which comedy groups from universities nationwide are invited to perform in the nation's capital." However, that is about "Georgetown Players," not "Georgetown Improv". Apparently, they are about the same topic, but the multiple names for the topic may be why people can't find source material on it. I looked several ways for source material and didn't find enough to meet . I'm not against using student news papers to meet  in general, but I'm starting to see The Hoya come up in several AfDs and whereas other student newspapers are not commonly brought up at AfD. I might have to rethink my position
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: well I for one said I would wait to see if this could be brought up to scratch. But I don't think it has, so I'll help with |consensus by giving an opinion. In my opinion, the article still relies on blogs, student newspapers and passing mentions in articles focussed on things other than the subject. On balance, I still don't think it meets . Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS||WP:GNG)

Comment: without giving an opinion about the article itself (I have commented on others elsewhere and am waiting to see if some can be brought up to scratch) I would like to make a suggestion: a good start would be to remove all the references from The Hoya and other on-campus student sources so that you can argue your case against only reliable, independent sources. |Link spamming reference from The Hoya is only going to make other editors think (rightly or wrongly) that the article fails  and that involved (in some cases openly |COI) editors are trying to create notability where it does not exist. Whether you agree or not, |consensus seems to be that those sources are not independent. Given the article for The Hoya openly says the paper has financial links to the University, tried to cut them and failed, it is easy to see how that conclusion could be drawn. Get rid of them, build your case with the independent sources you say exist and these articles will all be saved. The reality is that if an article relies (entirely) on The Hoya to meet the ''"significant coverage"'' tag then it probably fails  already, regardless of independence
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:LINKSPAM||WP:GNG||WP:COI||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:GNG)