Deletion of Ancient Grains

Comment: and I note that this nomination clearly qualifies for a  closure. I also note that I've listed, on the article talk page, a number of additional, excellent sources, that justify a "Keep" closure, as well commenting on several cited sources in the article that I feel do not meet  criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:RS)

Comment: per . The nominator hasn't explained why these issues are unfixable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The question before us is whether "ancient grains" is a topic that is encyclopedia, verifiable from reliable sources, and notable. It appears to fit all of those criteria, with all of the search links coming up with extensive results. Even leaving aside incidental mentions, much has been written on the topic -- more than enough. The article (or list) needs work, but that's not relevant to an AfD discussion. Clearly  wasn't fully pursued here. --Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)