Deletion of Disappearance of Tia Sharp

Comment: I actually have to agree that the case is in fact recieving a huge amount of media attention and as Egg Centric points out the sources keeps coming. Notability requirements are met.  are met and definitly also  per persistent media coverage of multiple media. I have been convinced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Fails #NEWS, more like missing white woman syndrome
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I think discussions of this sort are inherently subjective: developing events like this often won't satisfy  or , but there's little point in deleting them if it's clear they soon will. In this case I think 146.90.141.14's logic is sound: it's hard to see the story dying down anytime soon, so coverage will go beyond a short news cycle (as required by ). I could be wrong though. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: as an article "created on flimsy, transient merits" per . There is very little information in the article to suggest this is notable or historic in any way and it does not seem to be a very obvious or prominent case like Disappearance of Madeleine McCann (I have not heard anything about this at all, even on the news, before finding this discussion). Wikipedia cannot have pages for every single missing 12-year-old London schoolgirl
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: See otability, , slow news season, Missing white woman syndrome
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:local)

Comment: per  and lack of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: This is not notable per  and fails  (See my comment below
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Reading /CA, it reads ''The disappearance of a person would fall under this guideline if law enforcement agencies deemed it likely to have been caused by criminal conduct, regardless of whether a perpetrator is identified or charged'' - this is a disappearance and a body has been found in one of the family houses. (Although it isn't relevant under that rule, a suspect has been charged: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/aug/12/tia-sharp-murder-stuart-hazell
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Recent developments mean that this is no longer a "disappearance" story, and it is now top story across most UK media sources: BBC News, Sky News, Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Daily Mirror, etc. And, alas, also that it will now meet the  guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: This also fails per  
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: all very sad, but as this story has developed away from the blazing publicity of last week that the poice actively create when searching for a lost chid, this is now simply coming down to a non-notable murder of an innocent 12 year old by a serial criminal.  would easily seem to cover this, something for WikiNews pages but not an encyclopedia article. Rgds
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)