Deletion of Ice Queen (film)

Comment: and continue searching for sources improvements per Joe Chill's . While I can appreciate the nominator's concerns toward the article's history, corection is best done through regular editing, not deletion. Further, I note that editors ARE doing this... taking http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ice_Queen_(film)&diff=prev&oldid=332974789 what was first nominated and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ice_Queen_(film)&diff=prev&oldid=332974789 turning it into a reasonable Start Class article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Enough discussion in reliable sources to pass , I can find enough in Google coupled with Joe Chill to feel OK about this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: First, abuse of an article page is not grounds to delete the article, so the fact that the article has gotten overwhelmed, even repeatedly, by plot summary is not a rationale for deletion. That said, I don't the article currently meets . However, my question is with  and the two major reviews criteria. IMDB lists 14 reviews of the film.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0461788/externalreviews There are no major-name reviews on the list that jump out of me; however, I can't say that all of the reviews aren't notable. Is anybody familiar enough with any of them to say they are notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTFILM)