Deletion of L. Dinaparna

Comment: Passes . It is likely there are sources in Sri Lanka that would confirm broader notability if that is necessary (though I don't really see why we ask "experts" on specific topics to come up with sector-specific notability guidelines if we're constantly going to squash their expertise with the weight of opinion of people who aren't experts). Has anyone asked Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka|WP:Sri Lanka for assistance on this? Many of our projects and contributions on the English WP already have inbuilt bias towards UK/US/Antipodean topics because we can access sources for those relatively simply; just because this one is difficult doesn't mean that we should give up on it. Who does it benefit to delete it? Would it make the encyclopedia more "encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability|Existence does not prove notability, nor does it necessitate an article. The |general notability guideline is quite obviously failed here. I expect a certain admin participating here does not continue their |bludeoning behavior. It is very unbecoming, especially considering their role
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: I have sympathy with the nomination and the deletion vote above, but this player is from the pre-internet era, playing outside the English speaking world. I am not surprised at all that we have limited sources available. In this case I think the SNG;  should hold sway and suggest notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: for lack of significant RS coverage that discusses the subject directly and in detail. Played one match, so it's a  situation as well. No material to build a functional bio article; see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:WHYN)

Comment: Fails  and the coverage is routine.Now the the subject has played http://www.espncricinfo.com/srilanka/content/player/48578.html just 1 List A first class Match with his contribution being insufficient and has retired now the subject technically meets  as he has played just 1 Match but the subject comprehensively fails the General Notability Guideline and has long retired last played the 1 match in 1992-1993 thus ending any scope of future contribution or any hope of meeting General Notability Guideline and as Per Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_WP:NSPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|this discussion subject-specific notability guidelines do not supersede the general notability guideline, except in clear cases where GNG does not apply to.NSPORTS does not supersede GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCRIC)