Deletion of Little Miss Barber

Comment: as author. Not only notable as the subject of a significant advertising campaign of past times, but also as a common ghost sign in its home region today. ''Additional'' sources undoubtedly exist, but are likely to be in local archives, not online. This is exactly the kind of stub that will grow into a good article in time, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE)

Comment: It seems that the character started out with http://www.oldshopstuff.com/Forum/tabid/1803/aft/842/Default.aspx Barber's Tea but was later dopted by other companies - perhaps because they acquired the brand. In any case,there are lot's of Little Miss Barber collectible's being bought and sold online and I would imagine there is a reference to the character in a book somewhere that is worth searching for. If the consensus is to delete, I would hope that |userfication is allowed while references are sought. An opportunity to document the history of the character is enticing and it would be a pity to lose the information to history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFICATION)

Comment: The character isn't notable. I couldn't find any sources whatsoever when I searched. You seem to be misinterpreting  to mean that you can have articles on non-notable subjects in the mainspace so that they may one day become notable. Even if there were sources from online archives, they should have been added ''while'' the article was being created, not afterward
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE)