Deletion of List of fictional Vice Presidents of the United States (2nd nomination)

Comment: The idea that, just because parent topic X is notable automatically makes List of X notable, has been |thoroughly debunked. All topics (and lists ''are'' topics) |require coverage in reliable, secondary sources that discuss the subject of the topic. In the case of lists, this would require sources that discuss the ''list''. In the case of pop culture and fiction, insisting on this is particularly important because otherwise we get a proliferation of badly sourced, fannish articles of dubious reliability, limited scope and minimal usefulness- just like this one. Lastly, Carrite is badly misunderstanding . That guideline means that a subject's notability doesn't decline just because no new sources mentioning it are appearing any longer; it does ''not'' mean Wikipedia cannot |change its mind on whether a subject was notable in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:V||WP:NTEMP||WP:CCC)

Comment: WP:LISTN|Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists, and the subject of this one does not meet the |general notability guideline. This list goes against |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information since the inclusion criteria is merely existing as a fictional Vice President, with no criteria to determine which characters are truly notable to merit being on the list, so I do not think that it is an appropriate list-topic per the criteria of |appropriate topics for lists since it falls into what WP:!|what Wikipedia is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IINFO||WP:SALAT)