Deletion of List of atheist Nobel laureates (3rd nomination)

Comment: While the sourcing improvements are positive, they do not address the confused scope ("atheist, agnostic, nonbeliever or secular spiritual"). These are not at all the same thing (a person may be a nonbeliever in the dominant religion of his/her milieu while still having religious beliefs), and several people on the list (like Einstein) indeed had their own religious beliefs (often some form of Pantheism). Secular spirituality in particular seems to overlap with Buddhism. Furthermore, although the lede restricts membership to "self-identified" atheists, the sources in many cases simply reflect labelling by somebody else. A fundamental difficulty is that gaining a religion generally involves joining an organisation, while many atheists take no overt self-identifying action. This makes the list inherently  in nature. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.74.183|202.124.74.183
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as original research .  Nor does the list seem to have a neutral point of view 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: These lists run into a problem with  since other sources have not, AFAIK, made an issue of Nobel winners' religions. This one especially seems to have problems.  For instance I clicked on Anatole France.  His article does not say he was an atheist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: as . Remove the unsourced, debatable, and simply wrong entries (Einstein, for example, Albert Einstein's religious views|was not an atheist) and there would be nothing left. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.10|202.124.73.10
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The four nominations for this article, and the two mass nominations, prove that forum shopping  is not only alive but thriving on WP, and that there is an unreconcilable contradiction between  and the citing of previous deletions of articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:FORUMSHOP||WP:OTHERSTUFF)