Deletion of Remarkable identities

Comment: a shorter version into Identity (mathematics)#Algebraic identities, with a redirect left. The suggested target contains other identities that are not less "remarkable" (see ), and the target section is much too short. A  redirect must be left because the term is (or was) rather common
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK)

Comment: as |middle-school worksheet |cruft. This is fundamentally ill-defined topic. Like all aspects of mathematical aesthetics, designating an identity "remarkable" is a subjective judgment call, and in this case, we've no indication that enough people have collectively made the ''same'' judgment call that we can regard it as a part of the culture. What is "remarkable" about squaring a binomial? Or the fact that squares are nonnegative
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTEXTBOOK||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)