Deletion of Bihar under Lalu Prasad Yadav

Comment: Article reads like a  as described above, particularly by Santoshsatvik. Most of the section about Bihar_under_Lalu_Prasad_Yadav#Assessment has barely anything to do with the subject. Lalu Prasad Yadav is nowhere in the List of longest-serving Indian chief ministers. None of those 40 longest serving chief ministers of India have their own "xxx(state) under xxxx (CM name)". There is no need to develop a new standard for this subject as pointed out by the nominator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Notable topic with plenty of sources, and potential merge targets are long enough already. |AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: per . You can easily find more than 80 sources for expanding a subject like this, but the main article Lalu Prasad Yadav should be enough for all relevant content. That article is only 66k bytes, and there will be no issue with adding roughly 10k bytes more there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: Per  and . Comparing him with Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump as an argument for keeping doesn't hold water -- he's nowhere as consequential as the other two
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:CFORK)

Comment: A  like this could be appropriate if the information does not fit in the article about Lalu Prasad Yadav. However, I find the current article a bit confusing. First of all, the  does not seem to give a summary of the article as the lead is supposed to give, but instead provides background. A fork also does not need to contain a short biography of the person of which it is a fork (Lalu Prasad Yadav). That is no reason for deletion though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:LEAD)

Comment: Notable topic since a large part of media coverage during Yadav's tenure as the chief minister (or his wife's) was concerned about his "rule" of the state and was largely critical about it. Any  in the article can be ironed out however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: I don't see how this subject holds enough currency to require a stand alone article. I also don't see similar articles for every chief minister/state combination. Some of the sources don't even mention Lalu Prasad Yadav so the article also violates . Important content already exists on Lalu Prasad Yadav. Any important content in the article should be shifted to under Bihar article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per nom, Yoonadue and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)