Deletion of Limits.h

Comment: I find the assertion that this subject fails the  ludicrous. Any entry level C programmer would be familiar with these concepts (or ''should be'' anyway) and there are 100s of books which give this stuff coverage. Wikipedia:Five pillars states: ''"Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia.: It incorporates elements of general '''and specialized''' encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers."'' (emphasis mine) I don't see that this or the many other C programming-related headers/functions (:Category:C standard library headers {{tl|C Standard Library}}, etc.) violate . In fact, this is ''exactly'' the type of thing Wikipedia is very often good at covering -- complex subjects which are difficult to summarize and explain in layman's terms
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTMANUAL)

Comment: I think the page does not violate  and another user think it does and keeps making it a redirect. He do not want to AFD it, but here it goes. The article was marked with merge, but was not merged, it was just redirected to - the same as deleting it but without a afd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL)

Comment: per  per #1 in , #8 in , and the spirit of #3 in . (Added summary of my response above) The specialty encyclopedic content is easily handled in C data types, and the rest belongs in Wikibooks. If there were secondary sources which addressed this topic more broadly than how-to I could see keeping it, but that's not the case
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: and maybe merge and redirect to somewhere like C data types#Interface to the properties of the basic types or Standard C library#ISO C library headers. Why not just discuss this at an ordinary talk page? I don’t think anyone is actually proposing to completely |delete all the contents and history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:delete)

Comment: Please take a look at google books - I think its quite obiously that its doesnt fails |GNG? The article isnt in the best shape, but how does it fails ? Its a description of an header file with no examples at all
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTMANUAL)