Deletion of Moshe Sacks

Comment: unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject. Does not meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Sorry, but just saying "he is for sure notable" does not conform with our encyclopedia's policies, especially . The article still lacks something even resemebeling a source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: for a number of reasons: '''(1)''' This article is about a  Haredi Judaism|Haredi rabbi and spiritual leader who does not seek or get much publicity, see "NOTE" below. '''(2)''' (As the article correctly states): Being a  dayan (religious judge) and posek (decider of Jewish law) affiliated with the key Edah HaChareidis rabbinical council of Jerusalem is a rare and high position in Haredi Judaism that makes him automatically , just as an appointment to a local supreme court would be notable even without additional sources. '''(3)''' (As the article correctly states): He is the  of famous History of responsa|Responsa in Jewish law known as the ''Matnas Moshe'' (his name) based upon the multiple volume commentary by that same name he authored on the Torah, Shulchan Aruch, and Talmud. This qualifies the article per Wikipedia:Notability (academics), albeit it relating to Jewish religious texts within religious communities. '''(4)''' He belongs to a community that is cut off from the media and academic circles, so a search for his name will be futile in those SECULAR places, and it would be a loss to Wikipedia to lose even this minimal (yet clear) biography, therefore please note the application of  and needs a . '''(5)''' The need for more sources is genuine and can be dealt with by having Template {{tl|Refimprove}} and requests can be made at  to get help from Judaic editors to improve it, and it can still wait. '''(6)''' There is no "statute of limitations" on how long articles should wait to be improved, especially when its creators fulfilled  yet are no longer as active. '''(7)''' Bottom line, it would not help Wikipedia to lose this start to good work that is not easy to come by and would result in a gaping hole in areas that deal with information pertaining to a tough world to shed light on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTABLE||WP:AUTHOR||WP:DONOTDEMOLISH||WP:CHANCE||WP:TALKJUDAISM||WP:BEBOLD)

Comment: I think this is one of the rare instances where we really need to |be bold and |ignore all rules in order to improve the encyclopedia.  There remain notable cultures and societies that reject the Internet and this man lives in the midst of one of them.  Please remember that nothing in our policies about |reliable sources say that such sources have to be instantly available online.  Nothing in our policies says that reliable sources have to be in English either. Paper sources in Yiddish or Hebrew are potentially just as reliable as English journalistic sources that can be pulled up on a Google search. This man is an author with numerous published works over many years. I endorse IZAK's argument and urge other editors to oppose deletion in this case.  Don't let your own infuriation with the Satmar worldview cloud your judgment.  They infuriate me too.  I would make a similar argument about an article on a prominent Amish religious leader, or an article about a leader in any other culture that rejects the Internet.  Wikipedia should cover such figures
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD||WP:IGNORE||WP:RS)