Deletion of Michael Hagemeister

Comment: per . Levy's identification of him as the leading authority on the ''Protocols'' should be enough. Also, the identification by {{u|BlueSalix}} as a "vanity page" is problematic and unnecessarily insulting. It is true that the page was created (long ago) by a now-indefinitely-blocked editor focused on the ''Protocols'', but there is no evidence that the creator was Hagemeister himself and some strong evidence against (in particular, the page creator self-identified as Czech in Special:Diff/323270846|this talk page comment while Hagemeister is German
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: The page concerns the foremost Western authority on a thinker like Pavel Florensky, not to mention his other research achievements, and the deletion appears to have been proposed simply out of pique that Hagemeister was cited on the latter's page for a deeply informed remark one or two editors rejected out of dislike ().User:Nishidani|Nishidani
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: per {{u|Zero0000}}, the impact of Hagemeister's work on the ''Protocols'' meets #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)