Deletion of Flensburg stabbing incident

Comment: Has |significant coverage, and with the commentary by high-level German politicians it qualifies for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:EVENT)

Comment: At this point, it's just a routine crime, with no lasting significance. We also need a  at this point to think the incident ''will'' have any lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BALL)

Comment: The nomination says «only routine coverage from the day, and day after, it occurred and nothing substantial since».  ''This is false''.  For example, on 7 June, i.e., 9 days after attack, the Flensburger Tageblatt published a lenghty reporthttps://www.shz.de/lokales/flensburger-tageblatt/messerattacke-im-intercity-so-sicher-sind-zuege-und-bahnhoefe-id19995127.html (2,035 words, i.e., 5.6 typewritten pages, single space) critizing earlier media versions for inaccuracies —blaming ''Bild'', for example, and reporting on security aboard ICE trains, particularly after the rash of recent knife attacks aboard, which they listed.   These sorts of reports continue as the investigation progresses.{{cite news |title=Nach Messerattacke im Zug: Wann gab es ersten Kontakt? |url=https://www.abendblatt.de/region/article214484185/Nach-Messerattacke-im-Zug-Wann-gab-es-ersten-Kontakt.html |accessdate=11 June 2018 |work=Hamburger Abendblatt |date=5 June 2018}}   Besides, this attack has received international coverage (see sources), so it meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:EVENT)

Comment: per . International news coverage. As for whether this will be continuing or have a lasting impact we need a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:BALL)

Comment: per |significant coverage. Per good sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Oh, what a time for Wikipedia when every stabbing by a non-white "needs" to clarify that {{tq|The incident is not considered terrorism}}. Definitely a symptom of |recentism, but the more pressing issue is |NOTNEWS, which is evident by the wire-tap stories we see for a brief while after the incident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per .Lets wait and see how it develops
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: unfortunate, but unless it's a catalyst for something else occurring (at which point we can always re-create this article, and with more and better sourcing), I think this is  as well.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: does not meet  & per . The coverage is routine crime blotter; no apparently lasting significance or societal impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:RAPID)