Deletion of Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism (3rd nomination)

Comment: This is a summary fork from Allegations of state terrorism by the United States due to size. There are no POV issues as the article presents both sides of this debate. The bombings were clearly acts of state terrorism by the US and meant to be so, as documented in the Allegations article and it's talk pages, including references by Chavez, Chomsky, Richard Falk, the Target Committee's minutes, Frances Vryling Harbour, and others. Although there are those that feel differently. The article is very well referenced. And as far as , it seems just a bit POINTY to nominate this article the thirst time (plus a DRV) for essentially the same reason within about seven months
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Nomination is based on a misunderstanding of  .  states: "Since what qualifies as a "POV fork" is itself based on a POV judgement, do not refer to forks as "POV" except in extreme cases of persistent disruptive editing." Has there been "extreme cases of disruptive editing" in this case? If not the POV Fork argument has no merit., "Don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point" has absolutly no applicability here.  is about an editors behavior, not a content dispute
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:POVFORK||WP:POINT||WP:POINT)

Comment: It's important to get the history behind this article right and as someone who knows about that and a bit about this topic I'll go into a little detail here. The content was culled from one section of the article Allegations of state terrorism by the United States (not, as several suggest above, from Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Atomic_bombings_of_Japan_as_a_form_of_state_terrorism&diff=prev&oldid=214505149 dumped here because of wild disputes over at the "Allegations" article. It should have stayed there to begin with, and a vastly slimmed down version of this current article should be merged back to Allegations of state terrorism by the United States. One thing I cannot stress enough: Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is ''not'' the place to house some version of this content. It could probably be mentioned there briefly, but to have any lengthy discussion of the notion that the atomic bombing of Japan was state terrorism in the main "Debate" article causes major, major |undue weight problems. There are huge academic and popular debates about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, obviously, but only a tiny amount of the discussion revolves around the notion of state terrorism. It is discussed in those terms, most definitely, but almost exclusively in literature that deals more generally with the topic of state terrorism, particularly as supposedly committed by the United States. Thus Allegations of state terrorism by the United States is the perfect place for this content, probably in the form of three or four paragraphs in Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States#Atomic_bombings_of_Japan.2C_1945|this section (which, again, was how it started in the first place). The content was stable there for quite awhile and this article was only created in an ultimately ill-advised effort to end a really annoying content dispute. Let's redirect this title to the previously linked section and thus take things back to the status quo ante circa May 2008
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: POV issues are obvious, also clearly falls under  as well as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:POINT)