Deletion of Joshua Greenberg (2nd nomination)

Comment: This looks like an article about someone who has done their job well.  If that was a criteria for notability, perhaps many of us would be notable - or maybe not :)  However, as things stand, we would have to apply the criteria of  and  here and, against these, the subject can not be defined as notable.  It does not appear that he is widely quoted, cited or that widespread independent reference is made of him or his work in journals, books or other academic/learned media.  He does not appear to have received any notable award or developed original ideas/concepts/technique.  Hence my suggestion to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: While Greenberg has a Ph.D., his major accomplishments are in the field of librarianship. He is notable in that field. In my opinion,  does not adequately reflect notability guidelines for librarians. Even so, he meets  notability based on his position as Director of Digital Strategy and Scholarship at NYPL: "The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic institution or major academic society." While NYPL is not an academic institution, in addition to being a public library, it is also a major research library ( http://legacy.www.nypl.org/research/ ), and in fact one of the most important U.S. libraries, influencing library work around the world. If you disagree about the academic nature of the NYPL's , I think we need to use  to evaluate Greenberg's notability. Under those guidelines Greenberg's notability seems clear to me. First, this holds in the library world: "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors." Second, Zotero alone shows him as meeting this criterion: "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." I suspect that a closer examination of Greenberg's work in digital libraries would show him meeting a further  criterion: "The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: there seems to me to be a lack of coverage in reliable sources here. The sources provided are not about him, but relations trivial mentions in connection with other things. I don't think he meets . With regards to DGG's comment, his book might be notable, but that doesn't mean he is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)