Deletion of Stephanie Adams (3rd nomination)

Comment: the recreation asserts clear otability - She has been more than just a playmate - has a publishing company , written book and was involved in a notable legal case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I came across this AfD after noticing suspicious editing activities by a contributor. However, the only thing that has changed since the previous AfD was that Adams finally won a lawsuit that has been ongoing since 2006. The debate over her very borderline notability and possible COI have already been had in the AfD discussion in late 2011. The  about her pre-2006 activities seem very tenuous. To recreate a contentious article based on a  lawsuit seems completely wrong to me. To be honest, it is also churlish to criticise the nominator for bringing this to AfD, since they were told to do this by the article's supporters after trying on several occasions in April 2012 to re-redirect it. Hope that makes sense
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:ONEEVENT)