Deletion of Emirates Airlines awards and accolades

Comment: Short of videoing searches made via different sources, I do believe that it is the requirement of those who believe that these articles should be kept to show that the lists are in themselves notable by providing information from |reliable sources, which cover the subjects in-depth in order to write an encyclopaedic article. It should be noted that in the last 12 or so days, there has been no attempt by any of those editors who think these articles should be kept to show |notability by providing such sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Please note that |Concensus can change
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: WP:SELFPUB states 'Material from self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources in articles about themselves, so long as:'...'the article is not based primarily on such sources.' Even if other sources can be found, then there are still very real |notability concerns as there is not substantial coverage by |reliable sources on the subject of 'Airline XYZ awards and accolades
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Huaiwei, before you go accusing others of being disruptive and of trying to enforce an individual view, in other words, not being |civil, you should not that the number of editors who also share the same view as myself on these articles are clearly shown above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: Indeed.  states that ''"This does not mean that Wikipedia ignores precedent. A precedent usually has reasons too, which may '''still be valid'''. There is a distinction between unresolved good-faith concerns over a reasonable or policy related matter, and '''disruptively trying to enforce an individual view
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: All 3 articles have been equally highlighted, and all 3 articles are of equal poor-quality due to all 3 articles being sourced to a |self-published source, which does not provide us the ability to |verify inline with policy the information contained in those articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB||WP:V)

Comment: This Afd has been listed inline with guidelines. Please refer to . Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/American_Airlines_destinations/archive|this is one example of where similar articles have been nominated for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BUNDLE)