Deletion of Battalion 1944

Comment: This is a particularly unpersuasive nomination statement in particular. The notability (or lack thereof) with regards to the principals behind Battalion 1944 is of no consequence to whether Battalion 1944 ''itself'' is notable. In my view, it passes , if not by a lot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as passing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, namely /RS. Not having notable developer or other associated companies/people has no impact on the notability of the topic itself if the sources support it. Whether the product is released or not similarly has no bearing on notability if the sources support it. It's a bit  and I would say merge for now due to content size, but there isn't a suitable target, so a stand-alone article would have to do. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:TOOSOON)