Deletion of Drop weapon (2nd nomination)

Comment: to false evidence and the article about this particular incident (I can't find that article but ''that'' incident would seem notable itself) and not this single-purpose  article. The actual concept would be false evidence which has a nice train of redirects to it. That subject is more than sufficient to cover all of the slang terms people come up with for the same concept. As for this very specific use of the term, just because the newspapers used the same term doesn't mean that term is uniquely notable beyond what we already have at false evidence. Especially when it's clear that what this article really wants to discuss is a specific incident
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per : "''An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by the original research policy.''" I feel this article does not demonstrate notability of the term and engages in , using tangentially-connected examples of false evidence in order to further the standpoint that "drop weapon" is a significant concept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTNEO||WP:SYNTH)