Deletion of 2020–21 London City Lionesses F.C. season

Comment: meets NSEASONS as the team plays in a top professional league (NSEASONS, unlike NFOOTBALL, doesn't require full-professionalism). There's more than enough media coverage and sources to write a decent article. And easily meets GNG with recent coverage like https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/54479015 this and https://www.newschain.uk/sport/womens-sport/football/melissa-phillips-named-new-head-coach-london-city-lionesses-40549 this. Removing articles like this is 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: fails  due to a lack of significant coverage, and fails  for not playing in a |fully professional league. Ongoing coverage is not sufficient justification for an article when that coverage is |routine coverage. Honestly not as sure about the COMMONSENSE proposal; I don't see a real compelling reason to keep or delete, but I'm not sure where the assumption of notability for team seasons for the second tier of women's football in England comes from. The current state of the citations consist of player signings, match reports, and cup draws, which doesn't constitute significant coverage, so I'm inclined towards deletion. It is also completely inexcusable for user Bring back Daz Sampson to be making such inflammatory remarks of Spiderone and I hope that they will |assume good faith in the future and that they will strike their remarks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSEASONS||WP:FPL||WP:ROUTINE||WP:AGF)

Comment: per  failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: there is significant coverage surrounding the top two flights of women's football in England at the very least to the point where these fully professional teams meet GNG. Propose  is applied to the fact that while the second-tier is not fully professional, those teams that are professional in that division meet GNG and at worst the article simply needs expanding and improving, just like the vast majority of EFL League Two team's season articles which have the same issues but are left published. To have 92 men's team season articles and actively go out of the way to limit women's team season articles to 12 seems incredibly problematic. The current notability criteria was created with the men's league's in mind and needs to be adapted to fit GNG teams in women's football
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE)