Deletion of Libby Garvey

Comment: This isn't even a close call.  There is more than sufficient coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources of this politician's life and career to meet our |general notability guideline. Trimming it, per  is, no doubt, in order but the hatchet job that's been done on it during the pendency of this nomination strains the |assumption of good faith. Once this AfD is closed, the article should be reverted back to its prior state, info from the sources that have now been explicitly identified should be weaved into it and then it should be trimmed to make sure no one set of facts is given undue weight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE||WP:AGF)

Comment: WP:POLITICIAN explicitly says of local politicians, like Garvey: ''"such people can still be notable if they meet the |primary notability criterion of {{'}}significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject of the article{{'}}."''  Garvey lives in a whole other country than I do, but even though she is a ''"local"'' politician, her comments on transit issues in Toronto were covered in my local papers.  I don't think there is any doubt Garvey measures up to our general notability criteria, and that the article is well enough referenced to substantiate that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)