Deletion of Teresa May (2nd nomination)

Comment: I regretfully vote to delete. I'll be quite candid: I'm happy this conversation has been largely respectful but given the tone I've seen taken in other AfDs when  comes up (often, is invoked along lines of ), I do worry about how bias weighs on decisions to delete entries of people, particularly women, who've been involved in sex work. I'd be happy if I thought we could write a properly sourced article; that would make this easy for me to vote keep. But. I just do not see the sources here to write anything resembling a biography of this particular woman's life. That this entry has been around more than ten years, now gone through two AfDs (the present one being pretty darn exhaustive) and still no one has produced sources that go beyond naming some films (no sources that, say, review her performance in the films) and the amusement that she and the PM have similar names. Wikipedia does not have a deadline but nor does it run on hypothetical sources. If, say, reviews of her book come out, or someone writes a profile on her actual life, then terrific. But what we have right now is not the basis for an entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: per everyone else's reasons. Recent spike of news coverage due to Britain's new Prime Minister, but Teresa without an H falls well short of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)