Deletion of Mathias Bröckers

Comment: Fails . There are only two cites in the entire article, one of which is to an blog article written by the subject, and the other is a link to the subject's own website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: 85,700 Google hits http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Mathias+Br%C3%B6ckers%22&btnG=Search.  Is considered a notable journalist by the German-language Wikipedia http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathias_Br%C3%B6ckers, which lists nine books he's published - I can't say what they're all about, because I don't speak German.  If anyone does, some of that information should probably be translated and merged into the English article.  Calling anything "Striver cruft" strikes me as a violation of , and certainly suggests that this nomination has an agenda behind it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: From : ''Because this is the English Wikipedia, for the convenience of our readers, English-language sources should be provided whenever possible, and should always be used in preference to foreign-language sources (assuming equal quality and reliability). For example, do not use a foreign-language newspaper as a source unless there is no equivalent article in an English-language newspaper. However, foreign-language sources are acceptable in terms of verifiability, subject to the same criteria as English-language sources.'' In any case, policy is clear that it's '''not''' up to AfD nomintors and voters to dig out sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom.  Violates ,  and Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BALLS)