Deletion of Dark Souls

Comment: I agree with Someoneanother, why is this being nominated for deletion? I don't see how it fails  at all. 1) "Significant Coverage" is satisfied because the game is the main topic of each source provided, there is no need for original research to extract the content, nor is it a trivial mention. 2) "Reliable" is covered because I know that at least the first three sources are well known legitimate gaming news sites, I've seen them used in other gaming articles and I don't think it can get much more reliable than that. 3) Each of the sources are secondary sources, and we have multiple secondary sources for this article. 4) "Independent of the subject" does not apply here since none of the sources provided are directly affiliated with the subject or I think in this case the game's publisher. Demon's Souls was a very well known video game, from a very well known developer and publisher, I think we can presume that as more information on this game is released, more sources will become available as more gaming news sites post articles on the game and it's development, which I think fulfills the last bullet on the notability guidelines. Special:Contributions/71.112.84.244|71.112.84.244
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)