Deletion of Robert Boylestad

Comment: meets . Is clearly accomplished in his field. Can OTRS maybe get some permission from the individual to explain why he wants it deleted? Without any data in that it is very hard to evaluate whether that desire should be given any weight, and if so, how much
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: As noted by David Eppstein, and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Robert+L.+Boylestad%22+syllabus this search meets  criterion #4 (significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions). Citation impact http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sauthors=%22Robert+Boylestad%22 also indicates notability based on  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes  for his contributions to the field, Google Scholar shows hundreds and hundreds of citations to his work, his books are continuous in print with new editions regularly issued. Just the sort of person people come to an individual to look up. Perhaps because of his age, the main sources will be print sources, but so what? "Too old to Google" isn't a deletion rule. Yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: His existence as an (emeritus) professor at CUNY is sourceable (I just added a source for that, and removed some seemingly unsourceable material) as is the wide use of his textbooks. Seems to pass  #4. There may not be a lot beyond that that we can say about him, but I don't see why we should need to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Although the person in question has participated in the writing of a couple of textbooks, I see no sources that would support an article about him as an individual. Fails , and his request for deletion merely reinforces my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)