Deletion of SafeMinds

Comment: I expected to be able to find enough coverage for this one, but the sourcing is awfully thin and on balance I think there is not enough to support an article. There is an element of "blog famous" and several mentions from within the walled garden, but nothing that I can unambiguously say kicks this over the  threshold. The web of board memberships and primary contributorships blurs the line for "independent" coverage, and puffery from ideologically-aligned organizations is anyway pretty low on the list of usable sources. I was expecting more coverage related to the failed AMC ad buy (notability is not temporary, after all), but no such luck. They show up on those charity transparency sites, but those can be essentially autogenerated from publicly available tax documents; their fundraising activities should be added if we keep the article, but this does not establish notability. SafeMinds has an http://www.safeminds.org/about-2/accomplishments/ accomplishments page, but it can essentially be summarized as "we issued press releases, engaged in outreach, and supported our board members
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Although the organization has been mentioned once or twice by Reliable Sources, including the New York Times (cited in the article), there is nothing approaching the |significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources required to pass . I agree with TenOfAllTrades that there is insufficient content in the article for a merge; the article mostly consists of information about the founders and officers, none of whom are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:ORG)