Deletion of Invasion (Magic: The Gathering)

Comment: Your description of "independent" inaccurately matches the secondary market per 's description of independent sources. They are not "affiliated," so TCGPlayer would suffice. Conflict of interest? Are you saying a used car sales lot is a lapdog for '''all''' of the car manufacturers? Or could it be he could care less? If this was strictly like a Toyota dealership then I could get behind your reasoning, but it's not. Though I could if the retailer in question sold ''only'' one kind of product and had obvious loyalties. I'm sure there are plenty of retailer citations all over Wikipedia. I don't see how TCGPlayer or the others should be excluded
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Cross-posted to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiquities (Magic: The Gathering)) Though it pains my little fanboy heart, these standalone articles are not appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. The articles are almost exclusively sourced from the Wizards of the Coast homepage and the blogs/Tumblrs/etcetera of the designers and staff that worked on the product, which means they are not third-party sources and therefore cannot be used as |reliable sources. To respond to the comments saying we should keep these because Wikipedia is a good source of this information, I'd like to point you to the http://wiki.mtgsalvation.com/ MTG Salvation Wiki as well as |this list of arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and rationales why they are not useful. Also, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE||WP:PPOV||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: No, Leitmotiv, the issue is not my feeling about retailers.  The problem is that the relevant policy () assesses notability by looking at coverage in sources ''independent'' of the article's subject. The fact that the sellers make lots of money doesn't make them independent sources; it gives them a |conflict of interest.Indeed, in Time Spiral I did miss a reference from InQuest: an http://web.archive.org/web/20071124032902/http://www.wizarduniverse.com/magazine/inquest/004170053.cfm interview with the game's designer. That's not a great example of a secondary source. Anything which doesn't consist simply of quotes from the creator
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COI)