Deletion of Thomas Walter Warnes

Comment: Subject does not meet notability requirements of . Modest google scholar results. No search results outside of academia. None of the 'keep' arguments offer anything except 'FRCP' but this does not constitute a highly prestigious honour. People who claim that it does should read the RCP page which reads as an application for membership in a club requiring annual fees. Also, 'Candidates will need to … pay an admission fee in order to accept our award of fellowship.' I am surprised to see it compared to the examples mentioned in ACADEMIC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: meets  being elected FRCP, self nomination, if indeed thats the case, is irrelevant (otherwise looking forward to the above editors who believe this is an issue leaving their notability concerns on all the talkpages of every Federal/state politician on wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: elected fellowship in the Royal College of Physicians (verifiable https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/search/archives/f238c681-52d5-3688-9c95-4da413ee165b?component=56e5bccc-a5ee-3006-a838-26e5d023a68f here) meets #C3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)