Deletion of Malana Lea

Comment: Fails  and no evidence of in-depth reliable sources to meet . Interviews and social media posts aren't enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: no evidence of meeting , nor the requirement of secondary sources that is needed to meet that guideline. Probably a  case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: It's her own (and I guess your) opinion that is this is some sort of breakthrough role for her that is industry shaking.  But neither the personal opinion of the actor, nor your personal opinion is useful for establish notability; her's is not indpendent, and yours would be |original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: At the present time, she fails . According to IMDb, she's appeared on a few TV shows, but it doesn't look like any of that would amount to a significant role; she also doesn't appear to have a large fan base
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: One henchwoman role in ''Olympus Has Fallen'' doesn't satisfy . "The rest will fall into place over time"? "It might be bigger later on"? These comments just show she hasn't arrived yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Notability is |not inherited.  Your lengthy explanation is self-admitted original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)