Deletion of Hema Sinha (2nd nomination)

Comment: This seems to be a controversial article WHEW! After looking through the last AFD and this AFD, it seems the main case is establishing notability, which in my opinion has been done. Currently on the article are three references or outside sources. The newspaper, SunTV network, and sify online. All of these are independent of each other and establish that Hema Sinha does exist. What else is asked out of ? I believe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: one whole google news hit, with just a couple of paragraphs about her taste in clothes.http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?hl=en&tab=wn&ned=uk&q=%22Hema+Sinha%22&ie=UTF-8  So no real  worth an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: more than a single source is necessary to establish notability per , especially when the coverage is shallow, as the single source here is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I'm not even sure if Hindu.com is a reliable source. The page doesn't look newspaper-like. In any case, the coverage isn't ''significant'', which a prerequisite for  notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: She meets . Although her meeting it may just barely I've seen no reason why we shouldn't have an article on her (such as a request for deletion by the subject). Thus there's no good reason not to keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: After re-listed, it is noted that those who are commenting ‘Delete’ are mainly focusing on lack of RS. Please note that The Hindu news paper No. 1 popular and its own weight in India. It is considered to be one of the matured papers in India. As I echoed earlier, the notability is http://www.hindu.com/rp/2008/01/20/stories/2008012050010100.htm clearly established by it. Therefore, it doesn’t fail . We have a strong reason to keep. There must be local news also that is impossible to find online
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Considering the nom's last comments - "She does a job" apparently referring to the topic hosting her own TV show - and the renomination of this article less than three months after that last AfD (nominated by the same user) which was decided as KEEP is indicating this might be a  nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)