Deletion of UShareSoft

Comment: with  per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: no evidence to demonstrate that this company meets the requirements of  regarding notability. A http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22UShareSoft%22&cf=all google new search doesn't find anything. Jgweir, "We could delete the article, only to realize they are relevant in 3 months time." please see  if the company becomes notable ''then'' we can have the article, until then, we should not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: While I appreciate the effort that James has gone through to find sources, blogs and press releases are not considered |reliable sources. The ZDnet blog is the only one that I would give any real weight to, but even that coverage is close to trivial. I just don't believe that the article subject meets our |standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)