Deletion of Johnny Rapid

Comment: per Nom and Celestina007. No significant coverage in |reliable sources that are |not promotional, which is what any site does when clicked on and pop-ups for watching live porn results, or about the subjects relationship issues (legal or gossip) --- or that the subject garnered attention by offering to do a porn movie with someone else. The subject apparently bragged that negative news reporting has made him more popular. Wikipedia is not censored, but an encyclopedia, and is not a porn redistribution site. geni.com is not reliable to even mention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: No in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources can be found to substantiate nor prove article’s subject is notable hence fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)