Deletion of Celebrity sex tape

Comment: Looks well sourced to me so |BLP shouldn't be an issue, though I agree that maybe some explanation on the nature of celebrity sex tapes would be a welcome addition.  The fact that this went from a page blank to a nomination for deletion is almost enough for me to say speedy keep it, in fact.  Strong keep it it'll have to be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: entries should of course be worth noting, and entries relating to living people should be careful to avoid being a |coatrack - there are entries which satisfy those criteria, so deletion is inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: it is a |coatrack, and as this is a constantly moving target, it is better served by a category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: edit conflict) You've got to be kidding me. |Verifiability doesn't mean we check common-f******-sense at the door, nor is it an excuse for ignoring other principles of Wikipedia. We must consider |what Wikipedia is not. We must consider that we're discussing |living people. We must consider whether the available sources and the framing of the topic |allow us to make a balanced and complete article. That's just a few examples of what is spelled out in policy. We should also |use the sense given to us by nature. The growing abuse of verifiability as the end-all be-all of article inclusion and content considerations needs to stop
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:COMMONSENSE)