Deletion of Alleged Clinton Controversies

Comment: per nom. & others. Clearly runs afoul of  and likely 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:BLP)

Comment: WP:COAT, , , , and others. This page looks like it was set up as a go-to reference for the Republican candidates in the 2016 election to keep their hit points straight. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:NOTSCANDAL)

Comment: per , , , and . Also, suggest some review of contributions here: Special:Contributions/Professor_JR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:COAT||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: Textbook , , you name it. We don't have an Alleged Bush Controversies, an Alleged Nixon Controversies, an Alleged Roosevelt Controversies or an Alleged Lincoln Controversies either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NOT)

Comment: A big no-no. Clear violation of ,  and , to name a few
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COAT||WP:NPOV||WP:BLPCRIME)