Deletion of Mike Adriano (2nd nomination)

Comment: Satisfies two of the four criteria under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)

Comment: per . Imho the subject suffices item 1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)

Comment: per passing  per Malik Shabazz
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)

Comment: I don't see how the subject meets . The awards are scene related, and the requirement in CREATIVE is that they'd be widely cited by peers and successors. The praise is mostly interviews with adult actors
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)

Comment: for lack of . There was a high school track star by this name in Kansas City in the 90s who gets lots more hits on a proquest news search - where this film director gets zero hits.  Sourcing consists of several mentions in a single article in a minor academic journal called ''Porn Studies'', two mentions in a magazine about adult videos, and winning a series of porn industry awards in categories such as "Most Outrageous Sex Scene."  This is not enough to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. The AVN sources quoted above are little more than retouched PR copy, and the superlatives come mostly from other employees of the porn company he was working for. The "Porn Studies" mentions Adriano in passing a few times, but has no substantive critical commentary on his work. The harangues, above, about the porn wikiproject and consensus are belied by the extensive discussions that have taken place over the last few years, both on the guideline talk page and in the many discussions listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography/Deletion.  and , by well-established consensus, carry more weight than a Wikiproject's opinions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:RS)

Comment: on levels of consensus and evaluation of sources'':  implicitly—and, in some places, such as the section , explicitly—sets up a hierarchical scale of levels of consensus, and states unequivocally that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS||WP:LOCALCONSENSUS)