Deletion of Dritok

Comment: The sum of sources cited do not satisfy . Blogs, podcasts, passing referenc4e in an article about the constructor do not add up to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Weak delete - This is a borderline case of notability. This is an artifical language was invented by a person, and it's gotten some mention by invented language blogs and the like.  But it barely registers a blip in Google hits.  There is a book that mentions it:'' In the Land of Invented Languages: Adventures in Linguistic Creativity''  by Arika Okrent, but is that sufficient?    The  guideline may require multiple independent secondary sources, as it says: "the number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources".   Since the depth of coverage in that book is very minimal  (a single paragraph), I conclude that multiple sources must be provided.  Yet all I can find are very informal sources such as blogs and promotional material.   If this invented language is truly notable, more reliable sources will mention in in the years to come, and it will be deserving of a WP article at that time..  Changing !vote from delete to keep, based on additional sources provided below
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)