Deletion of Australian Involvement in the East Timor Invasion

Comment: as article is well referenced to reliable sources so  is passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence to support the nom's assertions that "this article is fundamentally biased and was created in bad faith to repeat slurs against a living person", namely Paul Keating. Article is very well-sourced to academic texts, reports and other documents. Seems to me like a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: ping|StAnselm}} Neither of those rationales you have put forward are grounds for deletion - see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: This is a massive subject that is well-covered in all sorts of sources going back to the 1970s, and one that we should have had an article on a long time ago. The article needs some serious work, and I definitely agree that the author is way too biased to helpfully contribute here, but  is massive overkill and the fifty reliable sources in this article is well and truly enough to sketch out the basis of a decent treatment of this topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)