Deletion of J. Paul Tanner

Comment: Very solid Google Scholar results (for the field) suggests that  has not been followed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The citation data is too low, even taking into account the nature of the field, and there is nothing else in the record (including the subject's own homepage http://www.paultanner.org/English%20HTML/Menus%20-%20General/about_dr_tanner.htm ) to indicate passing  or . No significant awards, elected academic society memberships/fellowships, no journal or book editorships, nothing else that I can see to hang one's hat on in terms of passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: I've been enjoying this discussion and I hope someone can summarize the final decision.  I didn't know about  so when I made the nomination all I saw was an article with references mostly by the subject, not about him, and an article that may have been written by the subject himself. I have no skin in the game, I'm just interested in the process and outcome
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)