Deletion of Rupert Cawthorne

Comment: Having completed a  search, the sources confirm that the subject meets the spirit of  and Wikipedia itself. Having the article here is an improvement of Wikipedia and adheres to the five pillars that form the foundation of the project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)

Comment: per SKCRIT 2 or 3 - I have serious concerns about the conduct of the nominator and the nomination is clearly erroneous that I don't believe the nominator has even read the article, let alone undertaken . There ''are'' references in the article and they clearly show that this player is notable per  (professional with multiple appearances) - the article simply needs improving, not deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: meets ; also here is one source https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=q-kzBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA32&dq=%22Rupert+Cawthorne%22+football&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjS2b7FsufsAhUSUcAKHbZvAG8Q6AEwAHoECAMQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Rupert%20Cawthorne%22%20football&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)