Deletion of Muhammed al-Darbi

Comment: to the appropriate 'Fooian detainees at Guantanamo Bay' lists. As BigXRay states, the arguments for notability for these people are based on |inherited notability and from passing references in articles that do not rise to the level of establishing notability, and also fail . Also Geo Swan's statment about "apologists" is a |serious failure of good faith
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E||WP:AGF)

Comment: These recent terrorism related AfD's all appear to be for articles that are reasonably sourced and have histories dating back years. At first glance these guys appear to be 's, but many have garnered  write-ups and  beyond just the initial event. The AfD seems to suggest that there is a historical precedent set for deleting these articles, but while the articles are old, the AfD's all started in just the past two weeks. Nearly all have a recommended merge or redirect target, yet they all end up deleted. And then in some cases, someone recreates the recently deleted page as a redirect to the specified target, but only after the page is deleted. This |selective deletion removes any potentially useful page history for the redirect, violating  and #KEEP. Moreover, these group nominations appear to have been done half-assardly because they don't all conform to a specific template or category (aside from being enemies of the US). I want to assume good faith, but these issues seem really fishy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:INDEPTH||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:SELDEL||WP:PRESERVE||WP:R)