Deletion of Mika Tan

Comment: Per  'prolific contributions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: once again !keep voters casting aspersions on AfD nominators unfairly.  is not an exhaustive process and just because one source has been found, doesn’t mean the nominator didn’t look. Having said that, !keep voters '''have presented no new sources''' nor explained why they believe the current sourcing is adequate (it isn’t).  in future please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AGF)

Comment: meets GNG, even if nom is unwilling to follow efore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: Fails  and . The nominator's assessment of cited and available sources is correct
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ENT)

Comment: per nom - no notable Ghits, so very likely does not pass WP:BIO as mentioned. May also fail . Kirbanzo&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily meets  That aside, try google books and scholar searches for her published works in biology from her days in academia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)