Deletion of List of fictional spoiled brats (2nd nomination)

Comment: as wholly |unreferenced |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOR)

Comment: my god, some people have quite the imagination. Way too difficult to maintain, calling a character a brat is |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Labeling a character a "spoiled brat" is definitely more |POV than fact-based. It's blatant |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: If not Speedy Delete #G4|G4 as recreation of material deleted per the |consensus established in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional spoiled brats (although as it had been more than a month since the article was recreated it might be better to make sure that |consensus hasn't changed) but it doesn't seem like any of the issues brought up int he original AfD have been dealt with. The article is completely unreferenced, gives no criteria for inclusion and would always suffer from |NPOV issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:CCC||WP:NPOV)