Deletion of Fleshlight (fourth nomination)

Comment: this product is known to almost all pornsurfers due to their extensive advertising" and a dearth of |reliable sources to back it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: or '''Merge''' into Artificial vagina. The article is a notorious target for spam and quickly fills up with marketingspeak promotional text. |Wikipedia is not a shopping catalog. The use of artificial vaginas in human sex behavior is encyclopedic, but this product is just one product in that class and the article does not point to any |reliable sources to bear on its notability. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS)

Comment: What is here (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fleshlight&oldid=81105744) at the moment could easily be added as a paragraph in Artificial vagina.  What was here before was a good example of , and was had '''nothing''' worthy of being said anywhere in Wikipedia.  Perhaps an article could be written, but the place to do it is in Artificial vagina, and then split it out from there '''after''' it is written.  &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)