Deletion of List of generations (2nd nomination)

Comment: As I've expressed on Talk:List_of_generations#The_terms_in_which_this_discussion_is_couched|the article's talk page, I have concerns with the way the way generations are characterized and the terms in which they are being discussed. However, as to the question of whether an article listing the generations employed by sociologists should exist, I have to say to Arthur Rubin that |Wikipedia has lists compiling comparable objects, each having its own article, without any requirement that a reliable source containing the same compilation be provided, or even that any reference be supplied at all
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LISTS)

Comment: This seems to be a good example of  as generation X/Y/Z seems to be the stuff of journalism rather than a good article.  There have, of course, been many generations in other centuries and places and I have illustrated this by creating the article Revolutionary generation.  Consideration of this may assist the discussion.  To my mind, the issue is whether ''generation'' is too loose a term, like ''movement'', to be useful for our purposes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)