Deletion of Mars Argo

Comment: And yet after a further two weeks, there is now a completely unsourced discography, but there are still only two sources that discuss Mars Argo (Noisey and Odyssey). The other four are articles about ''Poppy'', and give Mars Argo nothing more than a name check. Of those two, Odyssey is an {{tq|"... internet media company that operates based on a crowdsourced model, receiving articles from a base of thousands of volunteer authors ..."}}. User-generated content has never been accepted as contributing to  per : {{tq|"Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is also generally unacceptable."}} So that leaves the ''Noisey'' webpage, and that's just not enough to establish notability, per : {{tq|"... multiple sources are generally expected."}} Without any explanation of why an exception to our polices should be made for Mars Argo, those policies clearly indicate deletion. The closer hopefully will examine the references in the light of this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:UGC||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: there is enough coverage such as Noisey, Conquest of Sound and Wired (the Poppy content could be added here as there is speculation that Poppy is Mars Argo) for  to be passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It needs some more |RS, but the subject is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: does not meet  and significant RS coverage not found. This is not a viable article, as the notability / sources are just not there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: Everyone above must avoid the  fallacy. The existence of, and quality of, articles on Poppy and Titanic Sinclair are irrelevant to the debate on this particular Mars Argo article. Also, don't forget . Meanwhile I have seen no pronouncements within the WP community that Noisey is ''not'' a reliable source. I could be wrong but there are other places to debate that matter. So I would conclude that the Noisey review at https://noisey.vice.com/en_au/article/6v7jdr/mars-argo-are-done-being-cool is at least partially valid, and there is another robust review from Consequence of Sound at https://consequenceofsound.net/2009/12/album-review-mars-argo-technology-is-a-dead-bird/. That might be enough for basic |notability but I think it's a bit of a stretch because otherwise this artist is mostly talked about in blogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:CIVIL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , and the sources don't go beyond promotional articles, and aren't from significant news outlets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)