Deletion of The Reformation (band)

Comment: band with no notability presented.  In no way even comes ''close'' to passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: the page definitely satisfies  and . The band is notable and the page should not be deleted. Special:Contributions/67.159.191.98|67.159.191.98
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:N)

Comment: The article's subject meets the standards of neither the |GNG nor the topic-specific guidelines for bands. The brief album review in the Pittsburgh City Paper is fairly trivial in nature, and none of the other "sources" provided appear to qualify as|reliable sources. -Special:Contributions/208.81.148.195|208.81.148.195
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: It ''should'' by all rights be a speedy as there is no assertion of notability in the article, but we have to be here for 7 days now to satisfy the bureaucracy wonks and one very, very determined fan.  There are 3 references in the article, one is a 3-sentence review on a page reviewing 4 bands total, in the Pittsburgh City Paper a free alt weekly.  2nd is drawuslines.com, a blog with another brief review, 3rd is cdbaby.com, a music store.  Two scant reviews in a local free paper and a local music blog (the lead says this band is in SF but the infobox says their origin is Pittsburgh) does not satisfy .  There is also , with a long list of criteria.  This band doesn't come within spitting distance of any of the TWELVE criteria there.  If you can't grab that piece of low-lying fruit, there's no hope here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BAND)

Comment: The article adequately asserts notability: it presents multiple reviews and multiple references from the Pittsburgh City Paper, which is a non-trivial, published, reliable, and independent source that is not self-published.  Per : "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." A trivial mention is defined by  as "articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories." Album reviews that address the band directly in detail and describes their songs in detail, no matter how brief, are not "trivial mentions" and qualify as |significant coverage. The page clearly satisfies Criteria #1 of  as well as all of the criteria listed in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BAND||WP:N)

Comment: The 45-word album review in ''Pittsburgh City Paper'' is the closest to significant coverage I can find, and that's just not enough to pass ; subject also does not appear to meet the  criteria at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND)