Deletion of Tranche (software)

Comment: Meets  due to coverage http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/jprobs/6/i06/html/0607edit.html here and http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v25/n3/full/nbt0307-262b.html here (Nature subscription required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per lack of |significant coverage from |independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS)

Comment: If you disagree, I'll ask others to post here. I bet I can get several dozen fairly quickly."  This is |meatpuppeting, and is a bannable offence.  Further, the major issue here is |notability.  If you want to keep the article without violating policy, the best thing you can do is add references to where this software is discussed or reviewed by third-party |reliable sources, which I see there is already one there, maybe
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK||WP:N||WP:RS)