Deletion of Happy Mag

Comment: Specifically cites creating "award winning work", backed up with relevant references. This is explicit evidence of notability as per the notability guidelines for newspapers, magazines and journals in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMEDIA)

Comment: Several instances of coverage in |reliable sources such as The_Guardian|The Guardian and Australian Broadcasting Company youth radio channel triple j, so notable as per .—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORGCRITE)

Comment: Lead section cites multiple point of distinction, supported by relevant sources. 'Arts' section cites creation of custom typeface by third party, notable as per . Coverage in multiple reliable source such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian The Guardian and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_Media Vice Media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: per nom, and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMEDIA)

Comment: clearly doesn't pass either  or . Actually surprised this hasn't been closed yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMEDIA)

Comment: I agree that the subject fails . The references list is a joke, it's all the magazine itself and one other non-notable pub. Not even close, in my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMEDIA)