Deletion of Netherite

Comment: The current article is nothing but a game guide, as are the sources being used.  The only actual mentions of the material that aren't just how-to guides are basically just summaries and/or patch notes for the update that introduced it to the game.  There is absolutely no in-dept coverage that would allow this to pass the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but revert to draft) - I think that this could become an encyclopedic article over time. However, I can appreciate that keeping it in the mainspace for now may not be the best thing to do, so I suggest that it gets reverted to draft form. That way it can get improved upon over time and eventually, when it is encyclopedic enough (and hence passes ) can be reaccepted into the mainspace. I believe the same is fair to Redstone and Iron Golem (had it not been recently deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Unlike redstone, which I can see having ''some'' notability in regards to its popularity, there is literally nothing notable about Netherite at all, and this is pure 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: I proposed a deletion but it was contested via DEPROD'ed. Reasons were  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: as a non-notable entity in a video game failing  with insufficent reliable independent in-depth sources, such as /RS. This is gamecruft and most of the sources are update news/change log material. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VG)