Deletion of Harvey Updyke Jr

Comment: per nomination, per 86.17.222.157 and per . The act may have received substantial coverage, but it all seems to have been news about the act, and speculation on why he did it, rather than about the man himself. Hinckley, Oswald and Chapman, on the other hand, all received substantial and lasting biographical coverage, and not just about the single acts that they're known for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per  and , without redirection. A redirect would still serve to define this person by a single stupid act, which we shouldn't do per the spirit of . Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP)