Deletion of Thomas Bushell

Comment: An interesting subject is not necessarily a notable subject, and this is being confused here. Also, the academic study on Bushell seems to be little more than a case study on a convict - I don't know why out of all the convicts Bushell was chosen for this study but it could have been a random selection. In any case, I'm not sure that one study meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: A fascinating article, based on a reliable source. But what about notability? I thought I was going to have to argue that one source is enough and the  guidelines are inappropriate in cases like this. However, to my delight, I have found a good-looking online source, citing Margaret Brown's article, but giving other references and providing more information.http://www.fremantleprison.com.au/schoolgroups/educationalresources/Documents/FP%20Convict%20Biographies.pdf When I have time I'll edit this in. How was he special? He was transported and then hanged for murder and is still being written about 150 years later
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)