Deletion of Terry Maston

Comment: Meets  with coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Yes, articles in two different sources is enough to pass  despite some others' assertions above. Read the guideline, people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  with lack of multiple, independent, reliable sources of significant coverage. In case anyone considers OurDailyBears.com, I generally don't consider SB Nation reliable. Also consider guideline : {{tq|We require "significant coverage" in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic.|q=yes}} There's not enough coverage to take it beyond it's current stub state. Even the current state is exaggerated with unneeded sections at this point. Per MOS:BODY: {{tq|Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading.|q=yes}} (And let's not resort to  and excessive stat line fillers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WHYN||WP:NOTDIARY)