Deletion of Visa policy of Kyrgyzstan

Comment: Articles on well-documented government policies that affect many people should have no problem passing , and the encyclopaedia certainly does not suffer from the presence of additional, nonspammy, accurate, sourced information of international interest.A few hours ago Basket of Puppies went on a deletion spree suggesting that many of these articles were factually inaccurate. Since it was pointed out that many of the articles are directly based on reliable sources, Basket of Puppies has rephrased their reason for deletion, and pasted that across many articles instead, despite a number of objections in various locations. I think it would have been appropriate for Basket of Puppies to seek consensus, or address concerns, before going on another deletion spree. Basket of Puppies seems to have been in such a hurry to delete so many articles, without actually reading them, that a duplicate delete was created.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Visa_policy_of_Albania_(2nd_nomination)&action=edit&redlink=1Basket of Puppies now seems to argue that foreign policy between states is unencyclopaedic.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Visa_policy_of_Kyrgyzstan&diff=cur&oldid=prev That is different from their previous reasons for deletion but, I think, no more believable.I think it would be better to deal with this centrally, but Basket of Puppies has repeatedly said that it must be done on an article-by-article basis. It is unfortunate that people who disagree with Basket of Puppies are warned about their |failure to AGF:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Basket_of_Puppies&diff=prev&oldid=381115803
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:AAGF)