Deletion of Suicide of Tyler Clementi

Comment: This article covers the death of a non notable person. Per . This death is no more notable than any other death. All deaths receive a certain amount of news coverage, but I fail to see why this one is notable at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: did you miss the previous discussion that concluded just ''yesterday''? It seems hard to miss the large notice at the top of the article talk page. I find the nomination itself to be non-neutral and possibly of a tone to be deliberately offensive. A clear failure to consider the guidelines of . Tabloids have featured the story, so have many other reliable sources; it cannot be rudely dismissed as a tabloid fabrication. This has been a major topic of discussion, it is not neutral to describe it as a "nine-days wonder". The phrase "spontaneous howl of outrage" is rude and appears to be deliberately intended to offend anyone who has worked to verify the article or contribute to its creation and previous discussions. I suggest such text is struck from the nomination or this AfD deleted as disruptive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: due to the recent closure of the related AfD as a |snowball keep. In the absence of that, I would still recommend keeping the article due to the breadth of coverage. Remember that the topic is the death of the person, not the person himself. Since there are two criminal cases pending and new pieces of legislation being drafted as a result of the suicide and events that led up to it, this is a notable event on the order of the suicide of Megan Meier
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)