Deletion of Riverbed Technology

Comment: weakly.  This business is |''a designer and manufacturer of WAN optimization and network traffic measurement products''.  Simply being publicly traded on the second (and tech oriented) stock exchange does not necessarily mean they've had |significant effects on technology, history, or culture.  They might have: but press release based stories about http://microsoft-news.tmcnet.com/microsoft/articles/188678-microsoft-selects-riverbed-as-application-acceleration-hardware-partner.htm contracts awarded, http://www.crn.com/news/storage/221900111/riverbed-unveils-strategy-for-accelerating-access-to-public-clouds.htm plans for future products, http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/194667/quantum_sues_riverbed_over_data_de-duplication/?fp=16&fpid=1 litigation, and http://www.sourcewire.com/releases/rel_display.php?relid=23085&hilite= petty trade awards you've never heard of do not make that case.  I didn't find anything in Books or Scholar praising this business about the significance or historical importance of its wares, and News is mostly the same PR stuff.  The article itself lists its product categories and acquisitions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B||WP:ORGIN)