Deletion of Comey memos

Comment: Not independently notable. There are a lot of  sources but not much longterm notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Again, don't know if IP's can say this, but the article passes  with 43 reliable sources that talk about the subject in detail. Special:Contributions/86.99.13.208|86.99.13.208
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Only notable in relation to dismissal of James Comey. If it ends up being a white water situation then it should have its own article. Until then its nothing but 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: 43 reliable sources and hundreds more available show that the subject is independently notable. The subject abundantly satisfies . It is not appropriate for merging with Dismissal of James Comey, and article straining under it's own girth. I suspect the goal is to eliminate this article and then promptly trim unflattering material out of the target article, as has already been attempted.  https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-60&pages=Comey_memos Page view stats shows that the previous non-consensus attempt to merge and redirect was a disservice to readers. {{U|Casprings}} makes an apt comparison with Watergate scandal{{emdash}}Nixon White House tapes provides a best-practices model for how Comey memos should be handled
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: With all due respect to Casprings, who seems to have created more new articles on "Trump—Russia" than anyone, most such articles are classic  and will be irrelevant once we move beyond immediate political considerations and adopt a more historical view a decade from now. Comey memos is among the best examples of this phenomenon, as no–one has actually verified the existence of these alleged memos and no reliable sources discuss them as a separate topic from Dismissal of James Comey. Indeed, as {{U|Vanamonde93}} recently https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dismissal_of_James_Comey&diff=797141328&oldid=797123116 remarked, Dismissal of James Comey itself is likely to be merged to {{tq|"the main pages for the topic, ie Trump's administration/white house and James Comey"}} at some point in the indefinite future. I can see no arguments against JFG's central point that Comey memos is a redundant 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:CFORK)