Deletion of Necrophilia in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: On the basis of . This list is not notable.  Citing an MOS as a reason for deletion isn't cool
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL)

Comment: The topic is notable - see http://www.jstor.org/pss/30032074 here, for example.  The rest is a matter of ordinary editing per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: per Jclemens.  Contra the unexplained WP:SYNTH claim above, this is at worst an example of  given that we know what necrophilia is and we know what works of popular culture are (though the list's present inclusion of myths or legends is another issue).  Restricting the list to notable works of fiction obviates any concern with notability, including the off-base concern that the content must somehow be notable specifically in list format
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:CALC)

Comment: Completely agree. What possibility is there is  in any case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)