Deletion of Kallappadam

Comment: per easily meeting .  {{u|Gene93k}} is eminently correct. Come on {{u|Finngall}}, {{u|L235}}, and {{u|Arjayay}} The {{u|Joseph2302|nominator}} (sorry Joseph) made a poor #REASON|deletion rationale, should hone his , and really should understand that a topic's notability is found per sources being available, and not whether an article is sourced or not. We have enough sources speaking toward this film for the topic to meet . IE: http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-columns/kallappadam-a-meta-movie-with-good-ideas-that-needed-better-filmmaking/article7016070.ece ''The Hindu'', https://4d1fac7452666a9f1a1e7b6fa5af791fa725173b.googledrive.com/host/0B3ke7sJYbO1gVkRjUVh6bmtqeVU/IndianEnglishNewspaperSearch.html#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=kallappadam&gsc.sort= and '''many''' others. Did you guys forgot to do BEFORE yourself prior to opining
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE||WP:NF)

Comment: Notable as per meeting . Source examples include http://gulfnews.com/life-style/celebrity/desi-news/south-india/kallappadam-a-story-of-survival-in-the-industry-1.1474742, http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-columns/kallappadam-a-meta-movie-with-good-ideas-that-needed-better-filmmaking/article7016070.ece, http://www.sify.com/movies/kallappadam-review-tamil-pdulGXdejgcbe.html, http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/regional/kallappadam-selected-for-two-australian-film-festivals_1554078.html, http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/regional/mysskin-to-release-assistants-kallappadam
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFSOURCES)