Deletion of Sabine Römer

Comment: Seems to meet People's  criteria for notability, since the coverage is from multiple reliable secondary sources. Some of the depth in the articles isn't substantial, but the amount of coverage should make up for it. From searching Google and the article, I've found she is mentioned at least 3 times in the New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/fashion/jewelry-gender.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/22/fashion/jewelry-assymetrical-earrings.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/20/fashion/jewelry-instagram.html, twice in Vogue https://www.vogue.com.au/fashion/accessories/the-jewellery-duo-whose-new-line-looks-more-expensive-than-it-really-is/news-story/b5b219ba4c48e1532cffe9588cae1b42 https://web.archive.org/web/20160309134831/http://www.vogue.co.uk/blogs/vogue-today/2010/06/25/trunk-show, at least in one book (Fashion Africa - Jacqueline Shaw) and has created jewelry for Nelson Mandela, Morgan Freeman, and Angelina Joliehttps://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/celebrity-style/2019101078908/angelina-jolie-wears-swarovski-embellished-dress-maleficent/ - so she is at least notable in her industry. Also, not all of the sources mention "limited edition lines" or are only promotional like stated above - but even then, it makes sense for a jeweler's work to be mentioned frequently in articles about a jeweler. I think the current article is mostly let down by neglect, poor research and a lack of weeding out bad sources - so it's hard for me to vote "Delete" until further research/editing is done
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: per the analysis by ThatMontrealIP. Notability is  from coverage of her jewelry company, which doesn't seem to be notable either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)