Deletion of Corruption in Angola

Comment: Yes, the idea that corruption is a major problem in Angola is a point of view; incidentally, this "blatant point of view" is the opinion of every major source who has looked at the problem, like the International Monetary Fund http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B07E6D71338F933A05752C1A9649C8B63, ''The Economist'' http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=E1_NPSVQDGhttp://www.economist.com/countries/Angola/fromtheeconomist.cfm, Transparency International, etc. Can you find me any sources which try to claim that corruption in Angola is ''not'' a problem and prove that editors of this article are unduly suppressing those views? (Which wouldn't be grounds for deletion anyway). Some parts feel a bit like a  laundry list of every time an event happened in Angola and someone yelled "corruption!", but the article as a whole is quite appropriate and this series should be expanded to other countries as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The original posting of the prod template is improper at best, vandalism at worst. This AfD is a  violation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)