Deletion of Bacon mania

Comment: I don't think a merger is really doable here, at least not easily. The problem is that much of this is original synthesis and any merger is therefore going to require a substantial re-write. Its requiring a lot of the closing admin to weed through all the material and basically re-organize it all. Further, any merger should avoid using the term "bacon mania" per eologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Articles on neologisms are appropriate when it is a notable neologism, like this is. See . About original research, can you explain exactly why you think it's original research? —&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: The article's title is not a neologism as there is no new word here.  The title is a descriptive phrase whose meaning seems plain enough and so conforms to .  In any case, improvement of the title is not a reason to delete as changes are effected by a move which any editor may perform.  And I can confirm the notability of the topic as I have seen news items about it myself in London
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: The topic is notable per the multiple references in the article.  A rename should be discussed, either here or on the talk page, since the current name is leaning toward original research.  Perhaps a better name would be Bacon in American culture, Bacon in popular culture, or Bacon (meme).  I oppose merging to Bacon, because it would give |undue weight to this meme in the bacon article, unless it was ruthlessly trimmed down to a couple of short paragraphs. Since there is enough material for a stand-alone article on this, we should have an article on it. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT)