Deletion of LLamasoft

Comment: Is notable as has an international presence, also had an $80 million revenue in 2017. Uses sufficient sources to back up everything written. May need re writing in some areas as it does have a somewhat promotional tone (maybe in the ‘Awards and recognition’ section).  is not grounds to delete in this situation, although does need work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: This is surely more of the |undisclosed paid editing for which the article creator was blocked. Coverage appears to be poorly sourced, local only, and of routine activities such as fund-raising typical of any business start-up; the "awards" are completely trivial, the usual trade magazine you-pat-my-back-and-I'll-pat-yours.  appears not to be met. To those who think the article should be kept ({{u|Willbb234}}, {{u|Chaheel Riens}}, {{u|SebastianQuilo}}): how many sources have you identified that are (1) significant? (2) independent? (3) reliable? and (4) secondary?. Would you care to compile a table similar to that shown Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#How to apply the criteria|here so that others can evaluate them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:UPE||WP:NCORP)