Deletion of NoHomers.net (second nomination)

Comment: Per Daniel Olsen. There are a number of little things working in this article's favor, none of which would be good enough on their own, but the sum total makes me conclude that bypassing the letter of the  guidelines  would be advisable in this case. In internet forum terms this site is ancient (2001), it has some press coverage from a major outlet, it was mentioned multiple times by the series creator, and there have been other verifiable claims about staff involvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Clearly fails  (whoever disagrees needs to show how it ''doesn't''. The onus has to be on the defenders now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: After reading the article (specifically the Show Involvement section) and the previous AfD, I'm convinced that this is deserving of an article. Looking strictly at  (which is only a guideline, not absolute law) would indicate that we should delete this, but if all else fails, |ignore all rules and do what's best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:IAR)

Comment: Per above commentary references. Clearly, the recognition by the shows creators on the DVDs themselves (and these are mass-market DVDs, not a niche-product aimed only at fans) seperates this site from others, and adheres to  guidelines. Second Zagalejo's suggestion that if nothing else, this article should be merged with other well-known Simpsons sites covered by Wiki into an article on Simpsons fandom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per above. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)