Deletion of Dreams from My Real Father

Comment: because the topic passes . The topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Re: this passes GNG and ''must'' be kept.  Remember that this is a NOT nomination (mostly based on ), not a notability one.  NOT is a policy and NOTE is a guideline, so NOT trumps NOTE
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Yes, this article is about the worst kind of scurrilous crap. No, I do not want to dignify it with a Wikipedia entry. But notability is notability, and this clearly passes , sorry to say. We don't get to pick and choose
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but '''Re-write''' - the subject clearly passes  as far as I am concerned - there are multiple articles solely focussed on the "film" and responses to it. However, I don't think the article properly reflects the available sources at all. Almost every single source refers to the film as either a ''pseudo-documentary'' or a ''conspiracy theory'' (and not in very complimentary terms, either). Most of the stuff in the film seems to be obvious -theory stuff and even the responses in the sources provided highlight the fact that it was created on the basis of assumptions and theories, not facts or evidence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: as an obviously notable topic, per the readily-available reliable sources.  means that we don't publish propaganda, not that we don't publish articles ''about'' notable propaganda. I share
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)