Deletion of Virtonomics (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails  and . Most of the Russian sources mentioned above (and in the previous AfD) were in the article, but I removed them as unreliable, mostly press releases, that didn't even support the claims made. The sites haven't been vetted by |WPVG–which isn't unusual, especially for non-English sources–but ''if'' they were brought to G/RS I can guarantee that they would be judged as ''unreliable''. We're talking blogs without mastheads or any indication of editorial control, most without even ''author by-lines'', but prominent "advertise here" links. I couldn't say that the articles were advertisements, of course, but they're just like what we see on advert-ridden pay-to-review browser game sites. There is zero indication that this game has been featured or reviewed by any sort of legitimate gaming press
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:WPVG||WP:VG)

Comment: while the concept of business-based games are way cool in my book, this company just doesn't have enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to meet notability threshold.  Best found is stuff like these: http://www.gamification.co/2015/10/27/virtonomics-business-simulation-platform-for-education/http://www.onseriousgames.com/virtonomics-become-virtuoso-entrepreneur
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDY||WP:RS)