Deletion of Tsuhan Chan

Comment: per criterion G5 (created by banned user with little substantive input by anyone else). Even if that didn't apply, I still don't see how this meets the |notability guideline for academics, and any unsourced |BLP is always a bad thing to have around
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFTEST||WP:BLP)

Comment: Along with the IEEE Fellow, he passes a different criterion of , #1, due to his six papers with over 100 citations each. He has also received some media attention for his research, which I added to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as an IEEE fellow, one of the explicit criteria of , which was already confirmed by the faculty profile linked in the article before nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)