Deletion of Haredi-secular conflict in Israel in winter of 2011-2012

Comment: After looking at this article and making some edits in an attempt to salvage it, I no longer think such a thing is possible. It's mostly unsourced/sourced to op-eds/sourced to poor sources/sourced to individual incidents that don't discuss a larger conflict, and it's clearly written with the intent of promoting a poor-persecuted-Haredim point of view rather than accurately representing a conflict. It's also synth in that it attempts to create a narrative where sources don't indicate one, and in that it engages in original analysis of sources (some with the potential to violate BLP - seriously, you can't just describe a writer's piece as incitement to violence because you personally don't like it). I think it would be possible to write about conflicts between the Haredim and Israeli society at large (if, y'know, you treated it as a longstanding issue and wrote about what Haredim did as well, instead of as a recent event that was all about how persecuted Haredim are, and also used reliable sources), but there's not really anything worth saving here. |Blow it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: POV fork, . This is still unfolding and each individual incident is only of marginal notability. In a little while there might be secondary sources placing the whole thing into context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Even the title tries to do too much. The  /  issues raised above are best demonstrated by the description in the article as to how a number of unconnected "incidents merged into a single major debate with Haredim on one side and the secular world on the other side". There has been ongoing conflict between religious and secular Jews in Israel for decades and the collection of events piled into here as a single article is the synthesis of the article's author
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Clear content fork.Also there are  and  problem that I tried to fix but were introduced back to the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POV)

Comment: Satisfies  via significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, and not just from news sources of one ethnicity or political point of view. More than just an event or news story, since it is an ongoing controversy of some duration. "Conflict" is appropriate for the level of physical altercation which has occurred
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: explicit ,  The massive hype around this issue in Israel started with an article in the Washington Post, through a peculiar mention by Hillary Clinton, issues concerning the New Israel Fund funding recent anti-religion protests, to a massive and misproportionate campaign by the tabloid Israeli media which is about to dissipate. The mehadrin buses have been around for over twenty years, the signs about some separate sidewalks have rust on them showing their age, and a few instances of violence do not warrant a WP article at this time, especially seeing this same information in 6-7 other articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per #TEMP. While I understand the desire of the page creator to keep tabs on these separate incidents in order to build a story when it really explodes, it has not really exploded, and all these incidents do not add up to a news item of lasting significance. I also question the total reliance for references on The Jerusalem Post and Haaretz, neither of which are partial to Haredi Judaism|Haredim. For example, the alleged harrassment on the 451 bus was reported by the media solely from the point of view of the female provocateur; in fact, no Haredi man held up the bus and it was the driver who called the police because she was trying to aggravate everyone's religious sensibilities and then film their responses. Let's have some POV|neutrality, please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NPOV)