Deletion of Gregg Schlanger

Comment: Moderate but sustained coverage over a span of years; the overselling has been removed and the sourcing generally improved. I'd be willing to call this an instance of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: I've cleaned up the article and I think there are enough stories about his art from enough different reliable sources to meet both  and  #3, "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". But my keep is weak because most of the coverage is somewhat local (to the place of exhibit, not to Schlanger's own locality): he clearly isn't a superstar of the art world, but he's getting stuff made and exhibited and written about well beyond his own backyard and I think that's enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Not sure what to say about this one. There isn't any coverage in very good publications. Most of the coverage is not in-depth and mostly consist of sources like Clarksville Online and the like. Definitely fails  for lack of SIGCOV in high quality sources, and the question of whether it meets GNG is cloudy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST)