Deletion of Davina Reichman

Comment: I have to  admit that the extraordinary  efforts that the defender(s) are making to  keep  this article do  indeed appear to  be indicative of a very  strong  |confilct  of interest
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: the references are nothing  but  fleeting  mentions and the web pages mostly  closely   paraphrase the same articles or a press release about  an event. This is not  extensive coverage in  the serious press that  make for |reliable sources. Fails ,  and  whoever (person) or whatever (fashion company) the subject  is. The article is a blatant  vanity  page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:BIO||WP:ORG)

Comment: Despite the extra-long text above, the issue is simple.  Yes, its not a great article, and it was created by the subject and likely subsequently edited by people with COI issues. But as to whether she meets , its a fair nomination, because its a borderline case.  The coverage cited by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Obvious  and  issues, not even getting into the additional areas where I think there is evidence of ,  and  going on here. Also,  is not even light-years close to being a valid reason for leaving an article remain in the encyclopedia when it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP||WP:COI||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:BITE)