Deletion of Criticism of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: No reason for a seperate article, a very obvious example of a non-neutral POV fork. The article amounts to little more than numerous poorly sourced (majority are persaonal websites and opinion pieces) extremist/fringe views. I cannot actually find anything in the article that is properly sourced to the standard required by . Merge what can be salvaged. A single article will be far easier to monitor for neutrality. --neon white
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Keeping "criticsim" articles and main articles separately helps to  improve NPOV. If anything, this might be merged. But an AfD nomination is not the way to discuss merging (see eletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)