Deletion of Super straight

Comment: Regarding otability, I think not enough attention has been paid to {{u|Trystan}}'s comment right at the very top of this nomination, namely
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Seems to fail  but in few years I wouldn't be surprised to see academic studies mentioning this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Striking through my previous vote and voting "delete" because the other "keep" voters are embarrassing me.  I guess
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON and this is not a . Let's see if it's  in a few months
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCRYSTAL||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: The sourcing isn't great even when considering the flash in the pan time period. Just a couple internet-focused periodicals, all discussing how the term is just a new attempt at transphobia. Seems like a pretty clear  problem (and ) that has little to no likelihood to stick around. Maybe it deserves inclusion on some sort of list article on terminology somewhere, but that appears to be the best it's going to get. No real notability argument seems to exist to have an article on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:RECENTISM)