Deletion of Na Na Na (Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na Na)

Comment: Sufficient coverage for the song exists in multiple |reliable sources such that  is satisfied, in my view. For example, these four articles - http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1648644/20100924/my_chemical_romance.jhtmlhttp://buzzworthy.mtv.com/2010/09/23/my-chemical-romance-na-na-na/http://www.billboard.com/news/my-chemical-romance-to-release-danger-days-1004116426.story#/news/my-chemical-romance-to-release-danger-days-1004116426.storyhttp://www.aolradioblog.com/2010/09/22/my-chemical-romance-na-na-na/ - each provide more than trivial information on the song. Given these sources, and probably others if required, an independent article is appropriate at this time. Also, just to follow up on the earlier comments regarding chart info, and as User:Yvesnimmo noted, there is a ''Billboard'' link showing the song's debut on two of its charts http://www.billboard.com/column/chartbeat/chart-highlights-country-dance-club-play-1004117079.story which has been incorporated into the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NSONGS)

Comment: can any of you !voting keep point to a policy that supports keeping this article? According to , "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Even if the song charts, is there enough material in |reliable sources to flesh out a detailed article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG||WP:RS)

Comment: according to , charting alone is insufficient
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)