Deletion of William Andrew Dunckelman (2nd nomination)

Comment: sourcing is substantially tangential, local, tabloid, primary, affiliated-party and/or unreliable (particularly PR Newswire) coverage, and does not appear to meet . Nor does topic appear to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: Article is well sourced, with inline citations. The references are newspapers (Reliable sources) and have multiple articles specifically about him (not just in passing). He has received at least 3 rewards (all sourced). He meets every requirement of otability. I am confused why this was even proposed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This person has clearly not done anything notable per .  If the argument is that his community service award is notable (with which I don't agree), then that still falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP1E)