Deletion of Atwood Oceanics

Comment: satisfies  per review of available sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: does not meet , has not "been the subject of significant coverage" - of the three references, one is to a stock report, one about an acquisition and one about the founder's death = no in depth coverage per  - therefore, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: As per  guidelines, references such as analyst reports and research reports meet the criteria for establishing notability. Of course it can be very difficult to find a link to one of these reports as they are often behind (very expensive) paywalls. http://www.marketreportsonline.com/704233.html This link is to an analyst report (for sale) prepared by GlobalData. https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/266840/is-atwood-oceanics-a-great-stock-for-value-investors This second link from Zacks also meets the criteria. Topic meets GNG and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NCORP)

Comment: As  implies, a formerly public company like this has lots of sources that demonstrate notability, such as https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/266840/is-atwood-oceanics-a-great-stock-for-value-investors and others easily found with a DuckDuckGo search
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)