Deletion of Leo Lebeau

Comment: This guy seems notable enough to be included here on wiki, and from what I’m seeing does meet the terms of  as a creative professional. It’s clear this guy has achieved significant critical attention in creative fields. Ran a search and found extra sources referencing his BAFTA scholarship which itself is significant. He’s a keeper. https://www.reubenfoundation.com/bafta-announces-scholarship-recipients-from-uk-and-china/, https://www.fenews.co.uk/press-releases/19665-bafta-announces-scholarship-recipients-from-uk-and-china
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)

Comment: As I noted above, notability is not a question of what the article ''says'' a person accomplished — it's a question of how much ''journalism'' has or hasn't been done by real |reliable source media outlets, such as real newspapers and/or the BBC, ''about'' the things he's done. There's not a single footnote here that actually helps to get him over , however: every single footnote is |primary sourcing (directory entries, the self-published websites of directly affiliated organizations, etc.) and/or social networking content, and not even one of them represents a real reliable source media outlet writing about him or his work in a notability-building way. Notability requires ''media'' to ''bestow'' significance on him and his work by writing about him ''journalistically'' — critical reviews of his films, news stories ''about'' him and his work, etc. — and is not a thing people are automatically entitled to just because they have profiles on IMDb, or get posted about on the Twitter, Facebook or Instagram accounts of their own colleagues, or show press releases from directly affiliated organizations, or have a staff profile in the staff directory of their own employer. It's real journalism in real media, or bust
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: WP:Too soon He's accomplished a lot at a young age, but the otability in multiple  just isn't there (that I could find
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: While I strongly disagree with John Pack Lambert personal views I will state I have seen him vote keep before on the articles of LGBT people that meet notability criteria in the past . Here is a critical look at the references from the article. We should start off the bat by pointing out that references ''8, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, and 28'' have zero mention of Lebeau whatsoever. ''10 and 12'' are his own films and ''11'' is a trailer to one of his films. ''8 and 9'' are profiles from a talent management site and IMDBD. ''1'' is from BAFTA's website (Not independent from the subject nor RS coverage) profiling a scholarship winner and ''7'' is a similar profile ; ''2'' is simply a list of employees at Pink News and ''4'' is a list of alumni from the Warner Brothers UK Creative Talent Program; ''3'' is a press release naming him among scholarship recipients; ''13'' has only Lebeau listed as being in a photograph with no mention in the coverage itself; ''5'' appears to be a member profile from a club. ''15'' lists one of Lebeau's shorts among several dozen others (also does not appear to be from a reliable source); ''16'' is press release from NFTS; ''21'' is coverage from a non-RS blog; ''24 and 29'' are from one of his film's websites; ''27'' is a profile of an actress on a talent agency website. When you peel away the ing there really isn't much there. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: The arguments for delete mostly mention the weakness on references, but most of the citations do pass on  and . They are not just social media links, as this discussion initially lead me to believe. The article itself seems nicely written and neutral, about someone that is notable meeting latter terms of  and likely on the verge of becoming much more so. Agreed it could be argued as  but still seems worthy of keeping, I’d say. What else could be done instead of deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:QUESTIONABLE||WP:SELF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: clearly doesn't meet , and not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCREATIVE||WP:GNG)

Comment: The IMDB page for the director's film Sugarbabies shows that LeBeau won the Director's Choice Award and was nominated for Best Director and Best Screenplay (and an actress was nominated for Best Supporting Actress) at something called the Rainbow Umbrella Film Festival.  It also shows that LeBeau won Best Director and Gold Medal - Shorter Short at something called the UK Seasonal Short Film Festival.  Obviously this needs to be confirmed from reliable sources, which IMDB is not.  Aside from confirming that the RUFF is a real thing, I can't find much information on it or confirm the awards, but perhaps someone else can find more info?  I was able to find a little more info on the UK Seasonal Short Film Festival, but again unable to confirm the award results.  If these results can be confirmed from RS, would this be useful in confirming notability per irector prong 4 (b) or (c
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)