Deletion of MacEdition (2nd nomination)

Comment: It is |verifiable as it seems to be mentioned http://www.insidemacgames.com/news/story.php?ArticleID=689 here and http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-253904.html&feed.cnetbriefs here, but there is a lot of unreferenced claims about how it was a "respected web resource" among other information.  There are no sources supporting the online publication's notability., and is at odds with .  Also, the first deletion discussion was laughably bad, most of the argument for a keep refer back to an argument that "it does not appear too spammy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:WEB)

Comment: The previous AfD is downright embarrassing but then again, I have no idea what  looked like at that time.  As for the article, I can find no sources that would satisfy  or .  I would usually hesitate to !vote delete for a news published of any sort given how hard it can be to find coverage ''of'' the source and not ''by'' the source but this case seems very clear
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:WEB)