Deletion of List of remote companies

Comment: I don't see evidence that this meets , and is impossible to maintain due to having scant documentation and sources about what constitutes a company with a 100% remote workforce. The inclusion criteria aren't clear at all. For example, GitHub is owned by Microsoft, which is definitely not remote, and GitHub itself has a headquarters. Where do you draw the line
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Does not seems to pass . There is coverage at . I also have a problem with the definition of "remote companies" and the inclusion criterion. This is covered by Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Stand-alone list articles, that it should include a |'''lead''', and is subjected to the Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Content policies|content policies (Sourcing). Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|The lead is necessary to provide information relative to the subject, without falling into Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary|"The dictionary definition trap", and show it is not just an |"an indiscriminate collection of information" or |original research. At this point it would seem a ey or  would be required. Short of this I am leaning towards '''"Delete"''', so ping me if any improvements result
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTCOMPANY||WP:LEAD||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR||WP:H||WP:SAVE)

Comment: Without remote company existing as more than a redirect to this list, it's hard to tell what should be included in this or whether it's . Unclear if this is actually a substantive or notable concept. Note that article creator has also created :Category:Remote companies, so that should probably be nominated at CFD as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)