Deletion of The Hill (Boulder)

Comment: I don't know how the nom jumped to such a brash conclusion when it only took a second or two googling to find sources supporting a lot of what's in the article, not to mention this neighborhood's notability. http://books.google.com/books?id=G6FxmKLQAcwC&pg=PA94&dq=%22the+hill%22+boulder&hl=en&sa=X&ei=O6YXVP-FIsn68QGE5oFI&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20hill%22%20boulder&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=SI2M91foS7IC&pg=PA89&dq=%22the+hill%22+boulder&hl=en&sa=X&ei=O6YXVP-FIsn68QGE5oFI&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22the%20hill%22%20boulder&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=YzdzFbkZ-jUC&pg=PA200&dq=%22the+hill%22+boulder&hl=en&sa=X&ei=O6YXVP-FIsn68QGE5oFI&ved=0CD0Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=%22the%20hill%22%20boulder&f=false  Was  not followed?  Even the Boulder Convention and Visitor's Bureau has a page dedicated to it. http://www.bouldercoloradousa.com/listings/?action=display&listingID=1072  I'd be open for this to be '''moved to its official name, University Hill (Boulder)''' ("University Hill" is a disamb page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Noms should not speculate about sources, they need to do a search  nominating. Sources are readily available.  is not a valid reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:OR)