Deletion of Gwinhurst, Delaware (2nd nomination)

Comment: or, if we are to insist on following process, take the last discussion to |deletion review. A http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%2BGwinhurst%20%2BDelaware&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np Google Books search shows that this is a well-established name for this community in use for at least 70 years. Both the original discussion and a previous editor's comment point to , which is a proposed guideline that has attracted no support whatsoever. Our practice has always been to include articles on populated communities with well-established distinct names
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV||WP:NBHD)

Comment: to Brandywine Hundred, as was the result of the AFD 2 days ago. This is not the proper place to appeal an AFD closure.  is thataway.  Fails  and the proposed BHD. Unofficial subdivisions are better covered in articles about their cities, unless there are multiple reliable and independent sources about the neighborhood
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV||WP:N||WP:NBHD)