Deletion of Voice to skull

Comment: I reordered, rewrote, and cut significant parts of the article, dividing the definition and reality-based research of the technology from the delusional conspiracy theorist claims of government mind control. As far as I can tell, nobody is doubting that audio/voices can be projected inside people's heads using microwaves, as that was done in the 1960s, and was well understood and covered in scientific journals by the 1970s (see microwave auditory effect|MAE). I'm not sure if the complaints about  referred to the juxtaposition of delusional accounts of individuals with legitimate military research, or if it's that there's some doubt that the different weaponized uses of the microwave auditory effect (MAE) should legitimately fall under the term “voice to skull”. As I see it, MAE is microwave audio, V2K is weaponized MAE, and it's a simple topic. But the army's V2K definition simply described weaponized MAE, rather than using the term itself, which for some people may raise doubts of original research when discussing other weaponized MAE research as a form of V2K. I honestly think that view is due to a poor grasp of the science, but that's just my opinion. I've worked as a computer engineer for the last three decades, and have worked on a few high-frequency PCM transmission devices (nothing military), so the technology seems mundane, while to a layperson it could seem futuristic or confusing. At any rate, if the consensus continues to point toward deletion, most of the content aside from the conspiracy theory section would uncontroversially fit within the microwave auditory effect|MAE article, just by dropping the umbrella term “voice to skull
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS)