Deletion of Movie TV Tech Geeks

Comment: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: I have confirmed with the photo editor at Entertainment Weekly that it is actually three (3) photos they have used from the subject. I also confirmed with the journalist at The Washington Post that they have sourced the site and he did not post in the wrong link. He was more perplexed at the thought of Wikipedia questioning the veracity of The Washington Post's reporting. Twelve more respected source citations have been added to the article proving 'notability' as per Wikipedia's standards which states, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article."  I have been more than confused that I have repeatedly asked for help in making this article fit exactly into the Wikipedia standard but have gotten no answer. I have used my husband, who is a contract lawyer to scour the language, and he is not seeing how this article doesn't fall within the standards set in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)