Deletion of Kwabena Boahen

Comment: As I wrote when deprodding this, "The http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=WuOsGfsAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao citation record looks like a pass of #C1 to me." As in, Google scholar lists some 3800 sources, most of them probably reliable and independent, and most likely a smaller but large enough number of them with some in-depth coverage of his work. It's a bit early — usually someone who is a full professor at a good university will pass  and he's only associate — but I don't think that's a big concern. (For instance, part of the reason I can be skeptical of the notability of early-career scientists with big citations is that it's hard to disentangle their contributions from those of their mentors, but in this case that's not an issue, as his top-cited paper is singly-authored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Easy pass of rof#C1 in high cited field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: The person has good publications but lacks independent reliable sources. Person has received significance in ''IEEE conferences''. Let it pass as per  and generally 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:BASIC)