Deletion of Rich Carter

Comment: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=1-wNDp8AAAAJ Four papers with over 100 cites is borderline but above threshold to me. I thought this was going to be one of those rare cases where the only verifiable thing we could say about him was the existence of a few highly-cited publications, so that he would pass  but fail , and I was prepared to head for a weak delete on that basis, but Andrew D.'s link has proved me wrong. It's too local to add much to notability, however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:V)

Comment: Passes .  For example, see https://www.bizjournals.com/portland/morning_call/2016/01/spinoff-sequels-a-look-at-the-next-projects-of.html Portland Business Journal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: https://www.bizjournals.com/portland/morning_call/2016/01/spinoff-sequels-a-look-at-the-next-projects-of.html Portland Business Journa articlel meets   and https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=1-wNDp8AAAAJ  '''over 2.7K cited as per Google Scholar citation''' passes |NACADEMIC #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)