Deletion of Marriage Strike

Comment: I do not believe this to be a common term, the research is almost all original under  and it is poorly organized.  I could be convinced that it is notable under  if there were some non-original research available for the existing points and the areas in desperate need of citation could be filled.  However, it would still require another complete re-write
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NN)

Comment: As it stands the article is an original synthesis that uses Wikipedia as a soapbox - as indicated by the nominator.  Attempts to get the current |SPAs to address the problems with the article have not been successful.  There may be encyclopedic content above that already added to Arguments against marriage but if so evidence of it has not emerged
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)