Deletion of Mauricio Ramos (businessman)

Comment: Of the first 8 references, 6 are profiles, 1 is an annoucement of being a new ceo, and 1 is a best place to work in, for the company. There is no  sources in the article that can satisfy a , for  and . The other 8 references are company references. Nothing to do with man at all. There is not real coverage outwith the company. There is several annoucement of the new position, but nothing else. Fails . The Yahoo is an annoucement to a new position, the CNN reference is a press-release, the WSJ is a paid-for profile. There is really not that much on. Lots of standard notices of employement, company news and press-releases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:BLP||WP:BIO||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: WP:UPE spam that doesn't want to go down without a fight, it seems. The non-blocked keep voters have yet to show any |significant coverage by |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: As per all above, He is a notable CEO of a reputed telecom company Millicom. Sources like CNBC, WSJ, CNN, Yahoo and TD Ameritrade Network should be enough here to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WSJ, CNN and Yahoo are major media. He meets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Overall, Ramos has some press coverage which was earlier used in the page but as page is improved with reliable sources like https://www.cnbc.com/video/2016/02/24/selling-broadband-to-emerging-markets.html CNBC, https://forbes.co/2019/11/10/tecnologia/gobierno-cede-a-revelar-precio-base-en-subasta-del-espectro/ Forbes, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/liberty-global-brings-european-playbook-latin-america-eyes-more-acquisitions-1029153 The Hollywood Reporter and https://tdameritradenetwork.com/video/rB4AoWgbEeWBaDNRf_YFwA TD Ameritrade Network which are definitely  and are enough to qualify Ramos for  which is also pointed out by other experienced editors like {{U|Rogermx}}, {{U|Ambrosiawater}}, {{U|Expertwikiguy}}, {{U|Grailcombs}}, {{U|Sliekid}}, {{UT|Miaminsurance}} and {{U|Lesliechin1}}. As the major votes are on the Keep side. This discussion should be closed now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)