Deletion of Israeli shelling of Beit Hanoun

Comment: I have just completed some major cleanup of the article (including references), and I have to say that unless someone points the NPOV violations out to me I can't see any - all the references (with the possible exception of the Gush Shalom article which I suspect is likely not to qualify under ), seem to be from reputable sources, and no statements made in the article are taken out of context. This article is now better sourced and contains a good degree more information than Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident, all of it verifiable. The only question that remains in my mind is whether it is encyclopaedic (at the moment it seems to be more of a news article, but it has become an increasing trend on Wikipedia for events in the news to develop rapidly). I'd like to see some other unbiased editors opinions on this (I am neither pro-Israeli, pro-Palestinian, or anti-American), since it appears to be almost exclusively users with strong views on this conflict editing here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Please read  fork and  before claiming that creating a article the same day the event was reported is a violation of consensus. If nom would had bothered to check it up, he would have noticed that it was ME that added the merge requests, and soon as i became aware that another article existed. Funny, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABeit_Hanoun_November_2006_incident&diff=86596203&oldid=86572043 the OTHER article became ground for revert move wars, while http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_shelling_of_Beit_Hanoun&limit=500&action=history my article has had a stable title, even being http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABeit_Hanoun_November_2006_incident&diff=87526497&oldid=87473001 presented as a good title by somebody in the other articles talk page. I feel offended by the blatant bad faith accusations made against me here. You owe me an apology
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:ASG)