Deletion of Censorship in Kashmir

Comment: I agree that this topic meets |general notability criterion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think it's clear that this topic meets the |general notability criterion that the topic should have been the subject of significant independent coverage. At the moment, the inline references in the article focus on particular media blackouts, but a look at scholar.google.com shows that there's a wider academic discussion of censorship in Kashmir too. I've added Censorship in Kashmir#Further reading to evidence this. It would be easy to add extra news reports on individual episodes of censorship, but I hope the academic bibliography is enough to show notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM|The text has been improved since the nomination. Just as there are many articles ceated many years ago that get proposed for deletion, so we have tags that are many years old and no longer serve their purpose.  On the basis of improvements, the contested article passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)