Deletion of Keene High School

Comment: The article as is more than adequately describes the school, and there are ample |reliable and |verifiable sources available, that have already been added and will be added to the article to further demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: I want to say "delete" because there are no |sources provided. But I want to say "keep" because it claims to be award-winning in music. But there are no sources for that, so it might be |OR. Then again, sources can be gathered through a local newspaper, student government newspaper publications, and probably the site of the music awards they won
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: with Keene, New Hampshire since most of the stuff here is pretty basic, and I am unconvinced that information about school clubs is altogether encyclopedic. Nevertheless, info on a town's education system is valid so I'll oppose outright deletion. The wish to have ''independent'' sources is mostly one of verifiability as far as I can see. Unless someone is seriously contesting the ''existence'' of this school, I cannot see why the sources used should be a serious issue. (Dividing schools into "notable" and "non-notable" based on whether a newspaper has or has not happened to write something about them is a poor practice, which is the very reason I have disputed the  guideline.) There ''does'' exist an independent source that Barack Obama has used the school to stage a "town hall event" http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070314/REPOSITORY/703140315/1261/NEWS04, but it is not really enough to establish a fully independent article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)