Deletion of Wind and Water: Puzzle Battles

Comment: I would say this has sufficient notability based upon the sources. Not to go , but other independently developed games such as Uplink (video game) are notable, while initially not having been released into the mainstream, nor leading to spectacular sales
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)

Comment: I disagree that notability has been established in this case, a pity since it looks interesting. Listed in the article is an interview, which is useful for development but not for reception (which is the part where notability gets demonstrated), there's a short piece about the dreamcast release http://www.destructoid.com/a-new-dreamcast-game-wind-and-water-puzzle-battles-97560.phtml here, but what is needed is a couple of full-size reviews from |reliable sources. Being nominated for an IGF award is no basis for an article - "it was the running for an IGF award" so? Where's the reception information coming from? Nah, no prejudice against restoring the article if reviews show up in the future, but trying to build a broad and neutral article out of dribs and drabs doesn't work, I've tried
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)