Deletion of Nanotech Age

Comment: or userfy''' '' as a large batch of |synthesis and |crystal-ballery.  Taking a bunch of references that say "with that technology, this may be possible" and stringing them together doesn't make an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Hard to say whether it's true, but it's certainly |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Well intentioned, but not reasonable as an encyclopedic article. This would be an excellent opinion piece on a site encouraging original research, but it is not satisfactory here because a large array of views have been assembled with no coherent source (for example, "would most likely be fructose" is sourced, but has no relevance to the article topic). The content is essentially  built on an unimportant speculation about the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)