Deletion of List of things named after rivers

Comment: Excellent nomination argument is fairly convincing, although it ''could'' be verifiable (it ought to be possible to determine which things are named directly after the river or not). But in the real world it won't be verified and will become a magnet for  as the nominator notes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a |directory/unlimited amount of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as  an indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Oh, wow, I can go crazy with this. Violates  since it's an indiscriminate list. Violates  since you can't be sure this is why the things were named that. (Mississippi Stadium -- named for river or state? Or tribe?) Violates  since there isn't a way to know , except OR, what was named and why. Violates  since there isn't a source in sight....I could go on, but WHY? In fact, '''add some salt''' to this entry so that it doesn't happen again. EVER
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:RS)