Deletion of Michelle Jenneke

Comment: Per Rreagan007's argument.  Also, I don't believe that  applies, assuming the "one event" is the video of her warming up for a race that has received a lot of media attention.  The first instance of the video, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Michelle+Jenneke%22+dance&hl=en&biw=1920&bih=965&gbv=2&sa=X&ei=4DkMUN2RDa230QGYornmCA&ved=0CCwQpwUoBg&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A6%2F14%2F2012&tbm=vid from what I can find, appears on June 15th (my search shows its absence before then), the day of the race.  There's no significant coverage of her before then (https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8&ion=1#q=%22Michelle+Jenneke%22&hl=en&prmd=imvnsuo&sa=X&ei=WjgMUJKbMc2y0QGfksmKBA&ved=0CCYQpwUoBg&source=lnt&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A6%2F14%2F2012&tbm=nws&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=18eb769dd8c14aae&ion=1&biw=1920&bih=965 see here).  While the one event may have lead to more attention, she's also being covered for her hurdling.  It can be argued that the one event lead to more attention but it's not the only thing she's covered for.  You could call it the Kim Kardashian|Kim-Kardashian-clause of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: The subject does not satisfy any of the criteria at . If it is considered that the viral video "has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" then the subject passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK||WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: Her athletic record alone would almost certainly be enough to establish notability, but the viral video definitely pushes it over the top. You reference , which gives a list of criteria where notability is presumed. But even if she does not meet any of those specific criteria, that does not necessarily mean she is not notable as an athlete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK)

Comment: The nomination says "''sexy athlete wiggling her hips''" like it's a bad thing.  It is still our |policy that Wikipedia is not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CENSOR)

Comment: open and shut case, meets criteria #7 of  and also clearly meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK||WP:GNG)

Comment: She doesn't fit prong 4 any of  this guideline specifically requires a gold medal at the youth Olympics. The consensus from the NSPORTS community was that the Youth olympics have only occurred for a short period of time (once I think?) so we don't know how much coverage results from that competition. From some research we found that gold medals definitely lead to notable coverage but we were split on looser restrictions (likely after several youth olympics this requirement will be lessened to something like medalled, but for now its gold). I'm not sure prong 7 was meant to include relays, but as it is currently written she certainly passes it. However, thats not the reason I chose keep. She clearly has notable coverage that satisfies GNG for her hurdling, whether this resulted from her viral video is irrelevant, there is coverage of multiple hurdling events, so this does not fall under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: WP:HOTTIE,  etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK)

Comment: Criteria #7 of  states, "Has at any time held a world or continental record (including world junior records, world youth bests and masters age-group world records) ratified or noted by the appropriate official body." She took first place in the 4x100m medley relay at the 2010 Australian Junior Championships, setting an Australian record. Depending on your definition of continent, that alone would satisfy the criteria. Even if that does not meet your definition, that is still holding a sports record in a large country. Now, I realize that criteria #4 of  states, "Has won an individual gold medal at the IAAF World Junior Championships or Youth World Championships." However, she did win silver. That is still quite notable on its own, and combined with the previous comment, should probably be justification enough. And, as per Dream Focus, there does appear to be significant interest in her; we're here to provide the world with information. If that is the information they are seeking, should we not provide them with it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK||WP:NTRACK)

Comment: WP:GNG trumps  and given all the attention she has received lately from plenty of different reliable sources, she easily passes the notability test for inclusion in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK)