Deletion of Recipients of nanosecond

Comment: Hopper handed these out like candy … totally fails  … no need to try to document ''who'' received them, even in the main article … things like YouTube videos (the David Letterman link, for example) can hardly be considered . Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{#if:71.166.157.40|{{User|71.166.157.40}}|Special:Contributions/71.166.157.40|71.166.157.40
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: the Hopper/Letterman video clip is a marvelous source. Calling it a non-reliable source shows a complete misunderstanding of what  actually says and means. It's a |primary example of Grace giving the full anecdote in her own charismatic style. Sadly, the video is also a copyright violation, and ''that'' is the '''only''' reason why we cannot link to it.The other references are all blogs or uninformative (the ganssle.com ref is almost useful, but contain no author-name), and she gave the wires to hundreds of people, and there is already a good full paragraph about the nanoseconds in her article. Hence I'm not suggesting merge at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY)