Deletion of Teen pornography (2nd nomination)

Comment: It would seem that at this point the article has established references that satisfy  which assert significant independent coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: There could be an article on this topic, if there were any reliable sources writing about it.  But there aren't.  As it is currently, the article appears to be mostly a list of titles of porn magazines.  The sources in the article mention the topic only tangentially, mostly to indicate either that the models are older and pretending to be teens, or that they are children and the material is illegal.  Both of those topics are covered in child pornography and pornography; there is no separate topic of "teen pornography", it's just a term used to sell magazines or web subscriptions.  The topic does not satisfy  or ; the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Looks pretty well referenced now. I know this is , but do you really think that panda pornography (or any other pornographic sub-genre) is more worthy of a Wikipedia article than teen pornography? I know that 'teen porn' is a vague and subjectively defined sub-genre of porn (not all of the performers are teens - and some pornography featuring teenagers doesn't live up to the stereotypes that so-called 'teen' pornography portrays), and that this has the strong potential to be a magnet for original research, but it does have seven different sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)