Deletion of Potential superpowers

Comment: As the extensive referencing demonstrates, a ''lot'' of people have speculated on the subject, which means it is notable by Wikipedia's definition of the word. As a (more or less) concise summary of those speculations, it's encyclopedic. No violation of  is involved, since the article is about the speculations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: 3 in  states: "Articles that present extrapolation, speculation, and future history are ''original research'' and therefore inappropriate. (empphasis added). This "future history" isn't original research. The article is clearly referenced with multiple (410 to be exact) reliable sources that cover this issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I fear that the nominator misunderstands |CRYSTAL as "Things not in the past or present are not to be on Wikipedia."  This is not an article about some band's album that may or may not happen, or some movie that may or may not happen.  This is scholarly, notable prediction, and should be included as such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)