Deletion of List of 2004 Songs

Comment: per Northamerica1000 as satisfying  and . Contra the nomination, NOTDIR itself notes that Wikipedia keeps "indexes or directories of its own content." And it is standard practice to limit lists of X, where not every X that exists is notable, only to the Xs that are notable. "Notable" means "has or should have an article" per , nothing more. So the nominator and Richhoncho's fear about this including all the 2004 songs that exist or were produced is unfounded. When the list is expanded with valid article entries to the point where it gets too big for one page, it can be split into sublists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:NOTDUP||WP:N)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: per . Define notable (to some it means front page news in the NYT, others it means a track on their favourite album). In the UK there are probably 5000 new songs actually released per week (albums, singles, download only). They are notable because issue can be established! That excludes those songs on amateur sites which could be referenced. In other words, songs by year has the potential to be larger than the rest of WP, or in simple terms, just too big to be of any use to anybody. There are many songs/singles lists by year, by country, by chart and if the creator of this article can find a section of missing lists then great, let's add it. As for the creator of this article, please see Wikipedia:Your first article and go from there, better luck next time and happy editing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE)