Deletion of Ben Eisenkop (2nd nomination)

Comment: I see significant coverage in reliable sources for at least two events. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Certainly no pass of rof. Too thin for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: Very little notability, even on the internet (there are Facebook pages, with no Wikipedia articles, with hundreds of thousands of likes per post and comment; Unidan receives a tiny, tiny fraction of that). It fails  outright, and the entire article is a result of |a small number fans using Wikipedia to make the subject look universally famous. The only reason this discussion appears to have survived a Delete vote last time was because someone posted a link to it on a reddit post about the article, leading to a vote brigade
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: He passes  quite clearly. We cannot cherry pick which subjects to allow and disallow on Wikipedia - most of the deletes seem to be  s
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Fails to meet the criteria for notability. Has met none of the rof requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per , for reasons stated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Unidan'' is a notable Reddit celebrity, and the article has several sources, spanning more than a year, so  doesn't hold
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The article seems to meet the , with sufficient secondary coverage in |reliable sources such as Daily Dot, Mashable, FoxNews, and other such things. Additionally, http://spartanideas.msu.edu/2013/11/14/sharing-your-passion-for-science-with-the-world-through-reddit-interview-with-unidan/ seeing that he was interviewed by an educational institution is also somewhat telling. Additionally, http://motherboard.vice.com/read/reddits-favorite-scientist-just-got-banned-for-cheating-the-site Vice covering this ban of this specific user is also very specific and telling
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)