Deletion of Pup-play

Comment: Rather than cite a Google Scholar search which includes many items utterly unrelated to the subject of this article, please select a few which you feel are |reliable surces which establish the |notability of this subject. The question is not at all whether BDSM has gained coverage in the press; it is whether "pup play" has
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: information for which |reliable sources are available into Human animal roleplay
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It is the "terribly small number of interested parties" and the lack of coverage which tends to make this practice/interest/subculture not meet the Wikipedia standards for |reliable sources and |notability. The two books may be in specialty bookstores, but do not appear to have sales numbers all that large, and the lack of their appearance in libraries is troubling with respect to their establishing this as a notable sex practice, lifestyle, whatever. Merger to Human animal roleplay as suggested might be appropriate at this time. We reject crystall ball claims that something is "bound to become notable" in the future. If it does, an article can be created then
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: as nominator) The websites do not appear to satisfy , but I would welcome others' evaluation of them.  As for the books, the  one by Scribner "Of wolves and men" and the one from Owl Books "The great American Wolf" appear to be about real (not pretend) wolves. That leaves two books, by Micheal Daniels, which seem to be about about "pup play." "Woof! Perspectives into the Erotic Care & Training of the Human Dog" which per Google Book Search is held by 4 libraries, including only 1 public or college library, and "Grrr! (A collection of dog and puppy fiction.)" which did not show up in any library collection per Google Book Search   Are they "reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" or limited circulation fan publications?  They are, according to Amazon,  from  "Nazca Plains Corporation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)