Deletion of Bob the Builder (character)

Comment: here are some sources that may be used to improve the article on this notable subject: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-232X.2001.00197.x "William of Sen to Bob the Builder: non‐cognate cultural perceptions of constructors", https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201414000586 "Is it real? The development of judgments about authenticity and ontological status", https://www.jewishlinknj.com/monthly-sections/health-link-new/7306-what-we-can-learn-from-bob-the-builder "What We Can Learn From ‘Bob the Builder’", and lots of sources about the change to the character: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/29596319/bob-the-builder-gets-a-makeover-with-new-look-and-voice "Bob the Builder gets a makeover with new look and voice", http://www.essentialkids.com.au/entertainment/tv/fans-outraged-over-bob-the-builders-new-look-20141014-115xxy "Fans outraged over Bob the Builder's new look", https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11160902/Bob-The-Builder-didnt-need-fixing-says-cartoon-characters-creator.html "Bob The Builder didn't need fixing, says cartoon character's creator", (note: these sources were found after a 10min basic gsearch, it took me longer to make this "comment" - apologies if they're not all deemed |useable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There is no good description of the character in the other pages and, even if there were, this was not be a reason to delete.  The character is the star of the show and is remarkably popular.  They are therefore comparable with Captain Kirk, Batman, Sherlock Holmes and other iconic characters, for which we have separate pages. The page in question is new and so just a stub but there is plenty of material to support expansion such as ''Barbie meets Bob the Builder at the Workstation''; ''William of Sen to Bob the Builder: non‐cognate cultural perceptions of constructors''; ''"Can we fix it?": Bob the Builder as a discursive resource for children'', &c.  Relevant policies include ;  and .  Can we fix it?  Yes, we can
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:BITE||WP:ATD)

Comment: The article in its current state warrants notability tag, BUT sources identified above by Coolabahapple show the topic is notable. 1) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-232X.2001.00197.x This has several paragraphs, through reading them it seems the discussion of the show and the character is very intertwined (PSA: use Library Genesis to read the article if you struggle with non-OA sources). 2) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201414000586 is not in-depth and uses the character just as a semi-random example for study whether kids can confuse real world with fictional, it does not discuss the show or the character. So those are the fail. And I want to explicitly address the part of the article recently added sourced to one of them that states "The character of Bob the Builder has helped to change negative stereotypes of construction workers among children." The source article DOES NOT make it clear if it refers to BtB a character, or BtB the show. BtB helped change the stereotypes, but BtB the show and BtB the character are very hard to distinguish in this context. But the rest of the sources do seem do discuss the character, due to their 'makeover' from mid-2010s. It's borderline, but I think that this can be kept due to the discussion of this one aspect of the character, since we do have 2+ RS on this (and more can be easily found: http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/29596319/bob-the-builder-gets-a-makeover-with-new-look-and-voice, http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/29596319/bob-the-builder-gets-a-makeover-with-new-look-and-voice, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/new-bob-the-builder-twitter-reacts-to-characters-modern-makeover-9790794.html. All that said, I do wonder if in this case there is much separation between the show and the character. Essentially, it's a  type of coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: per sources identified here, which indicate subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)