Deletion of Trilegal

Comment: As the creator of the article I am opposed to the deletion of the page. There are |multiple, reliable, independent secondary sources available for the article including the Economic Times, LiveMint, OneIndia News, Moneycontrol among others including Legal 500, which for some reason the nominator does not consider to be a reliable source of information (http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/legal500.com Alexa rankings).  The firm has been ranked as one of the top 10 firms of the Asia-Pacific by Mergermarket which is a part of the Financial Times Group. I would also like to point out that the Bar Council of India prohibits firms from soliciting clients in any manner and therefore most law firms based in India are media-shy and do not have functional websites, and I believe that this augments the Wikipedia:Systemic bias|systemic bias that already exists on this project. If this encyclopedia can accept pokemon cruft, I think Indian law firms pass the threshold for inclusion. Please note that if you check the Economic Times and Livemint articles you will find that it is "Trilegal", the Indian law firm, as the subject of discussion and not Allen & Overy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)