Deletion of Aakash Institute (3rd nomination)

Comment: Thank you for responding and I will attempt to explain further with reference to your comments and queries. I agree that most of the media coverage is from mainstream media houses of India. But that doesn't automatically infer that the references meet the criteria for establishing notability - which is a little different than using sources to establish facts (where, in fact, company sources can be used in some circumstances). I've spent a lot of time looking at the sources - you say that ''"a few of them can be a pr piece"'' and I would say that, in fact, nearly all of them are PR pieces. Again I emphasise that we are *not* establishing facts but establishing notability and the criteria for establishing notability is specific about which sources are allowable and goes on to state that those sources must be intellectually independent and also states |they must not rely on pieces supplied or written by the company or their officers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Fails . Although there are 35 references quotes in the article, most fail  as they rely on quotations and facts from the company or its officers. The others simply name-check the company or include it in a Top 10 list. None of the articles provide any depth of coverage and simply regurgitate company announcements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)