Deletion of Luis González-Mestres

Comment: Here is what I found on the Web of Science: Searching for "Gonzalez-Mestres L*" I found 3 articles, cited 7 times in total. However, if I search for "GonzalezMestres L*", I get 122 hits, with a total of 1236 citations, top counts of 79-66-65-48, and an h-index of 21. However, this includes another person working in cardiology. Weeding out all that stuff, I am left with 15 hits, cited 96 times, with an h-index of 5. Of course, some researchers contribute in other ways than by publications alone, so I looked in "Labintel", an internal CNRS database of all CNRS personnel (as a CNRS researcher, I have access to this). Gonzalez-Mestres has been with the CNRS (meaning doing research full-time, no teaching obligations) since 1972. His current rank is French National Centre for Scientific Research#Employment|CR1. GM http://intersection.dsi.cnrs.fr/intersection/resultats-cc-fr.do?campagne=38&section=3&grade=15&phase=ADMCONC&conc=03/01 applied for a DR2 position, but http://intersection.dsi.cnrs.fr/intersection/resultats-cc-fr.do?campagne=38&section=3&grade=15&phase=ADMISSIBILITE&conc=03/01 was not ranked. All this also does not indicate any notability that might be derived from non-publication activities. Somewhere in the discussion above, the College de France is mentioned. While being a chair there certainly would make somebody notable, I have found nothing of the like in this case and all I can assume is that GM collaborates with a lab there (or has worked in a lab there), which is not at all the same thing. In conclusion, I don't see any evidence that any of the criteria of  are met. The single in-passing mention in ''The New York Times'' does not appear to be enough to satisfy  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: A careful examination of , the criteria for determining the notability of academics indicates that LGM does not fulfill '''''any''''' of the criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:RS in article are sufficient to establish -based notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)