Deletion of Circumcision policies of various countries

Comment: of course, per . And I wish those saying things like "looks well sourced" would actually read the nomination and policy, and that those wishing it were a different article, like History of circumcision, would realize that those articles already exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'd agree that some ''brief'' quotes are needed in the circumcision article, but do we really need 14 mostly long paragraphs of quoted material? According to : "Inclusion of brief attributed quotations of copyrighted text, used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea is acceptable under fair use. Text must be used verbatim: any alterations must be clearly marked. ... In general, extensive quotation of copyrighted news materials (such as newspapers and wire services), movie scripts, or any other copyrighted text is not fair use and is prohibited by Wikipedia policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:FU)

Comment: Rename''', or '''Merge''' a well-sourced article; but, let's stop mistaking AFD for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)