Deletion of 3dpaintbrush

Comment: I don't think the developer being redlinked is particularly relevant to the discussion but I agree with the sentiment to delete, and agree with 2's comment that there's a lack of good sources out there.  I find Pcap's reasoning sound.  I find some things in google news: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&source=hp&q=3dpaintbrush&cf=all but they seem to mostly be recycled press releases.  The articles seem to have only made minor changes to the formatting, suggesting that they essentially passed on a press release as-is.  This hardly qualifies as a |reliable source for establishing |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: http://www.thinkdigit.com/General/Geometric-introduces-3DPaintBrush_2272.html This is a news peace in Digit (magazine), no editorial comment. The stuff on informer.com is the very definition of . Blogs, more primary sources and youtube videos don't really count towards establishing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:N)