Deletion of List of most disliked YouTube videos

Comment: There is a long list of |secondary and reliable sources to support the page, and I concur it is not arbitrary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: The nominator is basically accusing the article of being an |indiscriminate collection of information. However, I do not think that this is the case; the list is limited to precisely 40 entries that are determined by an objective standard (specifically the number of dislikes received). Now per the indiscriminate policy, any list of data “should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources”. This article does in fact cite a number of reliable sources independent of YouTube (including the BBC, Time Magazine and the Guinness Book of World Records) describing the progression of the most disliked YouTube videos. Furthermore, the article also includes a number of sources supporting the claim that the most disliked YouTube videos are of legitimate cultural and (to a lesser extent) political interest.  While at first glance this article doesn’t exactly scream “encyclopedic”, I think it’s narrow enough and has gotten enough coverage by reliable sources to justify inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WHIM)