Deletion of Lee County Sheriff's Office (Florida)

Comment: The above is a pretty poor example to cite as precedent setting. There is not a single arguement in the AfD based in policy (except the delete arguement); it is 8 years old and community feelings about  and  have shifted. It was non administratively closed by a now indeffed editor. The article today still does not meet . If you wish to propose some sort of notability exemption for police agencies feel free, however this is not the forum for that. I am tempted to re-nominate GCSO for deletion again
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:ORG)

Comment: The size and scope of the department within its county merit an article based on strong past precedent. As always, |there is no time limit, and the article should be expanded with additional sourcing and material. I'm further disturbed that this appears to be part of a pattern of other edits by the nominator to turn other police / sheriff department articles into redirects, without any effort to shift the material into the target articles per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:NOTIMELIMIT||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: based on |past precedent, for example, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Genesee_County,_New_York_Sheriff%27s_Office. The ''office'' of sheriff of a single county is |far from automatically notable, but we have tended to keep those of larger counties. Fort Myers, Florida is a fairly large city, so its chief law enforcement ''office'' would be notable. Note however that its individual office ''holder'' |is not necessarily notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:MILL||WP:NOTINHERITED)