Deletion of 2009 Honduran coup d'état

Comment: back to 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis. This is effectively a |content fork of that article, and in fact contains much of the same content; we don't need two articles that duplicate each other. In theory, it might be acceptable to have a sub-article on the coup d'etat as a part of the ongoing constitutional crisis in Honduras, but this isn't it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: What the editor handling this AfD needs to understand, is that this article was a redirect to 2009 Honduran constitutional crisishttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009_Honduran_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat&diff=324504133&oldid=301569456.The reason for that is that the 2009 Honduran coup d'état article was '''''renamed''''', "2009 Honduran constitutional crisis".This was the result of rampant nationalist POV warriors, that didn't want the word "coup" in the name of the article about the coup -- '''''so the article about the coup was renamed, "2009 Honduran constitutional crisis"'''''.Before this fork the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis article '''''was''''' the 2009 Honduran coup d'état article, and most all of us really know it.This fork is just an end run around policy.The right way to handle the  violation would be to add a Name change request to the misnamed article's talk page, not to create an article out of the redirect (just because ''it'' is titled with the name  policy supports) -- that became a redirect after an admin declared the coup deniers/apologists right and the editors that wanted to comply with Wikipedia policy wrong.And yes, this is absolutely a POV fork. All it does is evade the Name change loss.I was so excited to see this end run around rampant nationalist POV warriors, that I forgot what kind of a Wikipedian I want to be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NAME||WP:NAME)