Deletion of Daimonin

Comment: so, you're suggesting that the article has merit because it helps to popularize the game?  Certainly understandable from a developer's or player's point of reference.  But |Wikipedia is not for Advertising.  Either the notability of the game is already sufficient for an article and the article should be here, or it isn't and it shouldn't.  The demand isn't being made on Wikipedia and its "standards in regard to open source."  Rather, the demand is being made of the game that its notability be established.  All that said, I'm abstaining from expressing an action opinion at the moment, and I personally appreciate those with vested interests saying so clearly
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Lack of reliable non-trivial sources, thus failing  ("Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources.").  The above links don't look to be reliable (blogs/forums) or are trivial listings (couple sentence blurbs/user ratings
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: all this talk of notability has obscured a key point.  Notability is a guideline, but |verifiability is official policy.  The devs have chimed in to this discussion and explicitly stated that they wanted to be "under the radar", and a consequence of this desire, there is little independent reliable sources covering teh development of the game
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)