Deletion of Nontheism

Comment: While occurring in a reliable dictionary is usually sufficient to establish , not occurring is not a proof of the opposite. Between http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22nontheism%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Google Scholar and http://scirus.com/srsapp/search?q=%22nontheism%22&t=all&sort=0&g=s Scirus, we have a clear case for inclusion. Where the specific content resides is a separate issue and should be hashed out at the respective talk pages
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: While there is a distinction to be made from atheism, Wikipedia is not the place to make it.  From a search of Google News and Google for "nontheism," it seems that common linguistic usage is against this article's definition; I get the same impression from the dictionaries.   and  suggest that there would have to be some source that claimed that secular theology, Buddhism, Taoism, Hinduism, and Hegelianism all shared something important called "nontheism" and distinct from "atheism" before there could be this article.   and  would set the bar higher, demanding that this thesis have been discussed and repeated.  Instead, this seem to be a mixture of original research and a non-notable neologism.  Renaming to "nontheistic religions" would not get around the verifiability, original research, and notability problems with this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:N||WP:UNDUE)