Deletion of Donald Trump "compromised" claims

Comment: Don't let's have another Gamergate etc that ends up in semantics and quibbles about news sourcing. Apply  and move on. When/if decent sources reflect on the historical record then we might cover it. Right now it looks like a BLP violation and if there was in fact any substance then it could be dealt with in the Trump article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as BLP-vio (). Not to mention . Anything reliably sourced can go into the base articles referred to above by {{noping|TonyBallioni
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G10||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and . I'm beginning to think that Wikipedia should have a global 3-day "cooling period" on using any sensationalist news stories as reliable sources in the domain of US politics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPVIO||WP:NOTNEWS)