Deletion of Defeating Jihad

Comment: Good point. I have changed my position above. I was responding initially to a perceived characterization of the sources as unreliable. The sources mentioned in the article are reliable and suitable for , although care has to be taken since they are partisan voices. However, it is true, as you point out, that the source links don't talk about this book directly, but rather the author's previous work, ''The Sword of the Prophet.'' (The link is dead, but the Archive has the http://web.archive.org/web/20051122201450/http://www.nrbookservice.com/products/bookpage.asp?prod_cd=C6077 page). Thus, the only review of the book we currently have is the Orange County Register. Independent searching of my own found another long review article (Counterterrorism & Homeland Security Reports, 2006 Summer, Vol. 13, No. 3, 893 words, Review by Carl H. Yaeger) -- it's behind a paywall, but I'll be pleased to send a copy to any editor who contacts me via email. Other than that, Lexis turns up mostly incidental mentions, hence my changing of my position to merge
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)