Deletion of Missionary salesman

Comment: The concept is remarked upon in numerous books and so the nomination's initial, evidence-free assertion is false.  If we see , we find that it spends much of its time explaining the difference between a short |stub and a dictionary.  There's no dictionary content here – no etymology, grammar or focus on a particular word.  So, this is the "''perennial source of confusion''" – "''the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDICTIONARY||WP:STUB)

Comment: The fact that one of the two sources is a dictionary is pretty good evidence that this is indeed a .  And, the wording is similar enough to the Chron source that I could almost convince myself  applies.  If somebody really wants to write an encyclopedia article on this topic, they're free to do so, but the current example isn't worth keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF||WP:G12)