Deletion of Aaron Bacon

Comment: I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: after a reasonably close look, I can't find any news reports or other independent sources about the film; there are some about the incident, but the film doesn't appear to have been widely enough reported on to pass , and it fails, as Schuym stated, F
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NF)

Comment: I appreciate the adamant nature of the above keep votes, and there are many valid points. However, the salient question here is, "is the ''film'' notable"? Whether or not the subject himself is notable is truly irrelevant here. The subject ''is'' notable, as the laundry list of references recently added point out. This indicates that there should most definitely be an article on ''the subject himself''. The argument above that it is the "production itself" that is notable is incorrect, in my opinion. Per , this article should be deleted unless far more robust coverage in multiple, reliable sources is located
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The boy himself may in fact be notable (but covered by ); the article is about the film though, and notability is not inherited. Unless you can provide sources which cover the film itself, it doesn't meet our guidelines. The sources in the article cover the boy's death, not the film. An article about the child is a completely different matter, which is not what we are discussing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: to clarify, I didn't mean to say that he ''fails'' , simply that were the article actually about the person, the guideline would have to be considered; in this event, the article is about a film which itself doesn't seem to pass the guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)