Deletion of William Shaw (mathematician)

Comment: No indication that either  or Wikipedia:Notability (academics) are met and contains no reliable references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I'm not sure about most of the arguments here but co-EIC of http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/1350486X.asp Applied Mathematical Finance (which should be mentioned in the article) seems enough for  #8. That criterion requires the journal to be major and well-established; it's been published since 1994 which I think is sufficiently well established, and as for major, it has papers such as DOI:10.1080/13504869500000005 with over 200 Google scholar cites. It's not ''Nature'', but I don't think it has to be to pass this criterion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets  criterion #4 (significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions). Has at least one textbook, ''Applied Mathematica'', currently in more than 320 libraries worldwide according to http://www.worldcat.org WorldCat
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per the opinions shown toward notability inre 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Fails  except in publications, where he fails  anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)