Deletion of Yakult

Comment: but tag as promotional or rewrite. I agree with Bakazaka, the company/product passes , it is just not neutral. That can be fixed with tags, no need for nuking
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: Clearly notable as can be seen by the number of sources on the company, ranging from its product, reference in popular culture, to scientific research - just a few here - https://www.theguardian.com/food/shortcuts/2018/sep/05/the-cult-of-yakult-the-surprising-reason-the-worlds-gone-wild-for-the-probiotic-drinkhttps://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/yakult-to-all-the-boys-ive-loved-before-netflix-sales-increase-rom-com-a8521886.htmlhttps://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/09/03/business/corporate-business/look-alike-yogurt-drink-netflix-teen-comedy-boosts-sales-yakult/#.W4-xWs5KiUkhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0884533612440289 (I even know people whose scientific research in a top academic institution was funded by the company, and their research wasn't about the company's products but basic science). Easily satisfies . Any concerns about promotion can be fixed, and there are also review articles https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=yakult+review on such product in scientific journals if there is a need to fix any claims about its health benefit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Without judging the state of the article as-is, it does look like there may be some other sources out there. Here's one from https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/509785/Brits-are-wasting-millions-of-pounds-of-probiotic-drinks Express criticizing probiotic drinks, with much of the attention directed at Yakult; here's another one from https://www.today.com/food/why-yakult-yogurt-probiotic-drink-surging-popularity-t136816 Today talking about the product getting a sales boost from a recent TV series, and a similar one from https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/drink/why-koreans-are-going-crazy-for-nostalgic-yakult-yoghurt-drink/news-story/488464333bde2b2f3b6e32ebfb30c272 news.com.au. Here's https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080910090238.htm Science Daily reporting a study from World Journal of Gastroenterology, but I am not familiar with  to know if that is acceptable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)