Deletion of Rindiddig

Comment: Per . Obviously, everything was made up at some time, but the guideline makes clear that notability must be established outside of WP. (and there are no references in Google outside of WP) By the way, this article is a perfect example of why I think that newly created articles should have a default NOINDEX template until reviewed for possible deletion. This editor has achieved their desired purpose, as the word is now found in Google, an achievement not as likely if posted to, say a personal web site. Deleting this article will minimize, but not eliminate the damage. While the damage it admittedly minor, it could easily have been prevented
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Also delete as per  and  per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC||WP:MADEUP)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Snowball clause,  and spam. I don't think it would be unfair for a nonadmin to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)