Deletion of Partial cloverleaf interchange

Comment: A bizarre nomination of literally one of the most common types of interchanges in North America. A  search would have provided the nominator with plentiful sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The nomination seems to accept that the topic is notable (which it is), does not propose deletion and does not provide a valid reason to do anything else.  Instead, we mainly have insults – cruft, garbage, &c.  Note that the page has been separate since 2004 and that there is no recent discussion of the supposed issue(s) on its talk page.  See , , , &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:BEFORE||WP:CRUFTCRUFT)