Deletion of Ward Churchill misconduct issues

Comment: When looking at this article, Ward Churchill, and Ward Churchill 9/11 essay controversy, I feel we have too much material on this individual.  The Ward Churchill article, left without this, would violate  by being overly biased in presenting him as a legitimate researcher.  Having this material in a sub-article but making that sub-article's summary more prominent (than it currently is) in the main article would appear a reasonable overall balance.  Sourcing meets  standards in the version immediately prior to deletion, with the likely exception of the source in footnote 54, which can be solved by editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BLP)

Comment: He just filed suit against his termination today, and from a glance at the article about the case, it's clear that he has some substantial points.  I think  implies without a doubt that this sort of stuff should not be here while it is still in the courts. &larr
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Cannot be saved from its many  violations, unfortunately (I know, I've tried for two years to save it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)