Deletion of Football club attendances (2006)

Comment: what is exactly the similarity between soccer, american football, rugby, australian football and canadian football except that they share the word "football"? And what reliable sources discuss this as a group (it is a list, so  would be the correct guideline)? I would agree that lists like these would be notable if they grouped all sports, or limited to individual sports, but I can't see how the sports that share the name "football" is worth to compare
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: I cannot see where this has been listed elsewhere before, compiling such a comparison has hints of  about it. How can July–June seasons be compared with January–December seasons? Why is the list using Wikipedia as a reference for European crowd figures? Why is there no "Total Attendance" field? Surely whatever purpose these lists serve can be fulfilled by List of sports attendance figures, although whether that itself should be on Wikipedia is also for discussion, elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: documented, sourced lists that belong together.  Needs edited for style and possibly content.  Sources could be better, but those are all surmountable problems that don't affect Notability.  Even if the sources given would be considered not reliable, there is no doubt that sources that meet  can be found and added
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WP:NOTSTATS is a style guideline which suggests we avoid adding huge tables of stats to articles, making them unreadable.  It is not applicable here because the tables on these pages are quite tight, legible and comprehensible - a commendable example of |summary style.  The other hostile shortcuts such as  are not policies and are instead just personal opinions equivalent to  which are contrary to  and .  The general topic of attendances is notable being covered in detail by sources such as ''The Economics of Association Football''; ''The Economics of Professional Team Sports''; ''The Economics of Football''.  These seem to be sources of good quality, being published by the Cambridge University Press, for example, and contain graphs and statistics, as one would expect for works of economics.  Covering such sports across different codes makes sense to provide a wide perspective per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NPOV||WP:PRESERVE||WP:GLOBALIZE)