Deletion of Leticia Quezada

Comment: almost no school board members are notable, and none are ''automatically'' notable; however, as with Lewis Powell, board membership on a large or well-known school board confronting serious controversies can get national attention. This subject appears to pass the POLITICIAN test. In this case, she was the board member of a Los_Angeles_Unified_School_District| gigantically huge district that is the 2nd largest in the United States, and she got into media spotlight often. The article needs some copy editing and more reliable sources, but it's |not that bad
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: as meeting  and thanks to the edits made by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Unambiguously passes both  and  (#2), per David Eppstein's sources: in-depth coverage, over a significant period of time, in major local and national news media as well as reliable history books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: School board members are not inherently notable, but they are not inherently non-notable either, especially for school districts as large as LAUSD, with bigger numbers of students than the total population of many countries. And SwisterTwister's claim that this is too low-level an ethnic first, and therefore that she is non-notable, is a non-sequiter: she doesn't have to be notable for that one thing to be notable. I just added two recent book sources to the two in-depth major newspaper articles that were already used as sources. I think the fact that she is still being cited as an example nearly 20 years after she left office is a clear indication of  notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)