Deletion of Georgia–Malaysia relations

Comment: per FOARP. That's sufficient, but I think it's also worth noting that this nom, like many others on AfD, is based on a fundamental misreading of , which states the conditions under which notability (i.e. appropriateness as an article topic) is ''presumed''.  To claim that a "failure" to meet the GNG means that ''non-notability'' is presumed is to flip the guideline on its head. Simply put, the GNG does not provide grounds for deletion. In particular, in this case, such an article makes sense (i.e. the topic is "|notable") because it makes far more sense to put encyclopedic information about Georgia-Malaysia relations to a single article than to duplicate it in separate Georgia and Malaysia articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: Clear failure of , multiple articles covering relations between the two countries can be found in reliable sources (e.g., https://www.nst.com.my/business/2018/07/396125/georgia-keen-fta-ties-malaysia 1 https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2018/06/23/envoy-invites-malaysians-to-invest-in-georgia 2 https://en.trend.az/scaucasus/georgia/2043108.html 3 https://www.malaymail.com/news/life/2015/03/14/georgia-beckons-malaysian-travellers/859367 4
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)