Deletion of Scrabbable

Comment: What qualifies a game as being "notable"? This is no better or worse than almost all of the wiki entries on drinking games. Plus, what proof is there that this is "original research"? Read this definition: |original research --this is not "unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas." It's a game, like any other drinking game on this site. Why don't you just go and delete every page on any non-licensed game here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as a |recently-made-up game that does not satisfy any criteria of |notability in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:N)

Comment: due to |notability and OR|original research problems, and now  delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOR||WP:SNOW)

Comment: WP:OR|original research. Probably could have been |Prodded
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)

Comment: per , I cannot believe this is still here after I nominated it after this much discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: This is a completely non-notable game.  Clearly fails .  Wikipedia is not for games FT|made up by college kids (or anyone else for that matter).  Arguing that |other drinking games exist is never a good reason to keep an article.  No reason to keep, no notability claimed or established, no independent third party sources, clear deletion candidate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NFT||WP:WAX)