Deletion of Dave Brytus

Comment: I'm not convinced that we've established anything beyond |routine coverage. They've never won or competed for a title falling short of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:ATHLETE||WP:NMMA)

Comment: Fails  with a lack of significant coverage. Also fails , , and . Notability can't be inherited from who he is guarding
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NSPORTS||WP:NMMA)

Comment: per EricEnfermero clearly fails  and  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON)

Comment: College football players can qualify under  if they have been the subject of significant, non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable, and independent sources.  I found http://www.denverpost.com/entertainment/ci_11327637?source=rss this feature on Brytus and http://www.timesonline.com/lack-of-work-is-fine-with-punter-brytus/article_710dd892-8426-5260-9f24-505ec24a44cc.html this story from the ''The Beaver County Times''.  There's also http://old.post-gazette.com/highschoolsports/20030827hsparkway0827p4.asp this from the ''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'' regarding Brytus' high school career.  Items like http://pittnews.com/23607/archives/notebook-brytus-leads-special-teams/ this probably don't help because it's from the Pitt student newspaper and is arguably lacking in independence. I would prefer to see a bit more before I opine whether he passes GNG.  Will try to take a deeper look later
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)