Deletion of Criticism of Vladimir Putin (3rd nomination)

Comment: per nom. & others. The article runs afoul of , , , & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:POVFORK||WP:BLP||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Inherently one-sided and so contrary to |core policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Regardless of the  argument that is going to come up, this article is a gross violation of both  and . It is absolutely correct that some of this material should exist, but where? In the main articles for a start, where much of this information is already present. Not in articles such as this, which are magnets for the loon  type views that often create a situation which is breaching . Take for example, Criticism_of_Vladimir_Putin#Allegations_of_political_assassinations_and_muzzling_of_reporters, which is presented in such a way to try and prove the ''guilt'' of Putin of muzzling reporters, and then ordering assassinations on those who won't be muzzled. Well what would one expect when the article is essentially from the POV of the Berezovsky crowd? All criticism belongs in relevant articles, not in coatrack articles such as this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE||WP:BLP)

Comment: not a fan of Putin. But fair criticism should be presented in context with other facts. Creating a page completely devoted to criticism is  weight and a violation of . There should be a guideline that provides limits or even exclusions on "criticism of..." articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: While it is possible (although not easy) to write a neutral and encyclopedic article under this title, at present this is nothing but a cherry-picked collection of factoids many of which are already covered in the main article anyway. It's also interesting to note that many of |other similar articles mentioned in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Vladimir Putin|first nom are now redirects, or have been deleted, or are going through an AfD right now. Let's do the right thing and put this "article" out of its misery. Don't worry, Putin will still remain the monster he is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)