Deletion of Gwlad

Comment: fails  due to lack of in-depth coverage by secondary sources. There are millions of message boards on millions of topics, many of them quite popular, but we don't include topics on the basis of popularity. Things are notable if they are covered by reliable, independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I was ready to support deletion here, but after looking through the sources that have been provided, I think this website does (just about) pass the notability requirements of  and . Coverage of the site in secondary sources is sketchy and marginal, but it does seem to be significant, as shown by the story about it organising a 6,000 signature petition to the Welsh Rugby Union in 2002. It's clearly the biggest and most influential site when it comes to rugby in Wales, and ultimately those factors lead me to (marginally) support keeping this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS)

Comment: Per #A7|CSD A7  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: While there were a few references to the forum listed in the article, it doesn't seem to pass . Also the article seems like more of a place to explain to social history of sorts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)