Deletion of Jessica Smith (poet)

Comment: I see people reviewing her work, but I don't see precisely where they're saying she's '''''notable''''' - i.e., that she's a young poet who is notable for her contribution to American poetry, or who is notable because critics agree she '''will''' be important. Also, have you found any scholarly study of her in print media? - a "notable poet", to me, doesn't just write self-published poetry - she not only gets published by respectable press, she also gets written about by scholars. Feel free to reply that I'm stretching "notability criteria" beyond what you see in  - but I think what should be paid attention to is , which states: ''Notability is an article inclusion criterion based on encyclopedic suitability. The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: per nom. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There is not sufficient |reliable sourcing to demonstrate notability here.  Fails  as stated above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: Nom has it right, this pretty much falls over on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: This is the first time that I have ever invoked . The fact that she's self-published made me initially skeptical, but I have picked through each of the 90 unique google hits for this individual and I'm inclined to agree that she is notable. I don't feel that she fulfills  as Dennis had noted above, however considering the medium, I would be willing to give her a certain amount of leniency there. Poetry is not something that gets a great deal of popular media attention, and therefore it's going to take a great deal more for a poet to be declared notable than it would Emily Hagins|someone new to the film industry. I relented and gave a keep !vote in that case, and I do in this one too. I don't see any harm in leaving this article where it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNORE||WP:BIO)

Comment: Google brings up a number of entries for ''Jessica Smith (poet)'', but whether they are this particular person or not, I don't know. But  states that creative professionals must be regarded as an important figure in their trade, created a new theory/concept/technique or written a well-known work, non of which can be attached to this person (yet). There is also POV in the article, but this isn't an issue really. I still think it should go for now though, because of the reasons I've given
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom and previous delete arguments. She just doesn't meet  in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I will not be changing my vote, as your rude behaviour towards people who disagree with you, and your subsequent  AfD nominations, have proven you're simply trying to be disruptive. I don't even think you'll be posting to this particular discussion, soon
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)