Deletion of Archduke Christoph Franz of Austria-Este

Comment: All true of course, but claimants ''might'', and I stress the word might, be notable under |general notabilty as claimants if they are the subject of significant coverage. While I can't see that any of the subjects of articles here do that, as for example the only mention I can find are the Wikipedia articles and they don't seem to be generating any coverage, the articles do include (or should I say ''did'' include) explicitly mentioned sources that do (or did) not verify any of the assertions made. I brought the articles here on |verifiability grounds but yes, even if the articles had passed , there would have been  |notability issues. Claimants to a long-defunct throne, unless they are the subject of coverage in their own right, would hardly be automatically notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:V||WP:N)