Deletion of Rose Bond

Comment: a weak one, not seeing the kind of coverage from  that is needed; there are lots of flaky sources in this way-too-long article which tries too hard, looks like , no sense this subject meets the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ADVERT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Her work is collected by MOMA and she has screened films at several significant film festivals (like Sundance.) Also, I fail to see how her coverage in the news and her inclusion in books and journals covering film and animation as topics constitute "flaky sources." I'll concede that the article is trying a little "too hard" and I'll copyedit when I have the time, though I'd encourage anyone who's interested to help smooth the article out. I don't think it rises to the point of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)

Comment: I have looked at . I fail to see how her inclusion in art sources and books falls under "poorly referenced junk" especially since she's included in an Oxford University Press reference book. All of my citations are checkable and inline. Also, why is Portland art museum an unacceptable secondary source? She is also award-winning in her field and published. I'm still working on her published works in the bib. BTW thanks for the links to the news sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)