Deletion of Stippleit.com

Comment: I have //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stipple_(company)&diff=478000645 rewritten the article and //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stipple_(company)&diff=478001117 moved it to Stipple (company) per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: The nomination statement exhibits a complete lack of research and probably not even a glance at the article's contents. Stipple clearly meets the |GNG and —http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/15/stipple-people-dots/ "Stipple Lets You Tag Friends In Photos, Even If You Post Them On Your Own Site" and http://techcrunch.com/2011/05/03/stipple/ "Stipple Opens The Kimono To Reveal A Product Tagging Platform With Massive Potential" from ''TechCrunch'', http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/ "How Stipple wants to shake up stock photos" from ''GigaOM'', and http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/25/stipple-hopes-to-tag-the-web-images/ "Stipple Seeks to Tag the Web's Images" from ''The New York Times''. Utterly ridiculous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB)

Comment: Stipple (company). Per references in the article, the topic passes Wikipedia's primary notability guideline, the |General notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This 2010 startup business, as best as I can understand it, sells a way to attach advertisements to photos on the World Wide Web.  I hope there's a Firefox add on to deal with this.  It has a busy PR department, and has gotten noticed in Internet related business buzz sites, usual suspects like TechCrunch and Mashable, and some business page coverage announcing this revolting development.  At any rate, I don't see this as the sort of |significant effect on history, technology, or culture needed to make any subject appropriate for an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIN)