Deletion of Grigori Galitsin

Comment: Sorry, but regardless of the claims and trials of the nominee, this article does nothing more than state the facts.  It appears to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It is a common error to accuse an information source (like an encyclopedia, news, etc.) of promoting something that it is merely describing. I agree with the others above - this article describes the facts in a neutral way, including the man's criminal history. He probably deserves criticism from his victims, but that can be done elsewhere. An encyclopedia like this one simply describes the facts if they are |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If this article were to be deleted, it should be on the basis of Galitsin's not meeting  criteria. I believe that Galitsin is notable, having been one of the more popular and recognized online erotic photographers/pornographers during the early-to-mid 2000s, as well as having had numerous non-trivial mentions in the Russian press during his initial criminal investigation. (In fact, translation of this article for Russian Wikipedia is propbably called for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)