Deletion of Bernice Madigan (2nd nomination)

Comment: Some Delete voters seem to forget that some supercentenarians receive no or very little coverage before their death, and some receive a lot, therefore some meet  and some do not. I would suggest that a notability guideline for supercentenarians is quite simple. For those whose age qualifies them for inclusion on a list, but who receive little or no significant coverage before their death, being in the list is sufficient. However, if, '''for whatever reasons''', people found them remarkable enough to write about them in reliable, independent sources, or to include them in documentaries, etc, over a period of time and with some details, then Wikipedia should reflect that significant coverage with individual articles. I did not think that Wikipedia was concerned with judging the merits of the reasons for significant coverage of individuals
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per GNG and NBIO. Her life was "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded." Any NOPAGE redirect should bear in mind  on the target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:PAGELENGTH)

Comment: This article fails  and  because there is only  coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the oldest x" is notable. The content of the article is almost non-existent. She lived. She avoided the Reaper longer then most. She died. Pure case of . Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on three different lists, where they are easier to view, so this permanent  is not needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB)

Comment: She is notable  with articles in the ''Huffpost'' https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/supercentenarians-tips-for-aging_us_59480faee4b0edb84c14a37d and ''Independent'' https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/secrets-of-longevity-meet-the-five-women-whose-lives-span-three-centuries-9996697.html, which I don't believe are sourced in the article. She has appeared on ABC news, featured in AARP Magazine, filmed for the Center for aging at the University of Chicago, participated in several scientific studies on aging http://www.iberkshires.com/blog/?bid=373. She is notable for her age, which is another way of saying she is notable for her lifespan and reliable sources cover basic aspects of her lifespan. |routine does not apply here because the reliable sources are about her and there is nothing routine about living to 115
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)