Deletion of Comparison of demand generation software

Comment: I'm not convinced that "demand generation software" has been treated in multiple reliable sources ''as a group'', as required under . A books search of the phrase gives only five hits, and none of them treat the subject as a group of things; they all discuss a particular piece of software. There's some http://funnelimpact.com/what-is-demand-generation-software/ coverage here, but this doesn't seem to be a very reliable source, as it's a commercial services site. There's some http://www.information-management.com/issues/2007_51/10001860-1.html discussion here, but it's a column, and as such is not really a secondary source. There's also talk http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9759543-16.html here at cnet, which is a reliable source, but it's also a tongue-in-cheek column (the phrase "I really wasn't expecting to have to wallow in it yesterday. :-)" is used). Other coverage seems to be either a) websites of companies selling such software or b) blogs and websites that wouldn't qualify as reliable sources. There's an element of  here in the synthesis of information from commercial sources into a list comparing demand generation software. There may be a commercial motive behind this article, but I'm not sure and wouldn't directly make that accusation, assuming good faith
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:OR)

Comment: Definitely a well-compiled stand-alone list. The fact that it aggregates sales sites does not make it unworthy for inclusion. Several of the items listed have articles and the topic itself is notable. See . If this article is deleted, it calls into question any other list that only contains commercial items. It has more references per entry than any list I've seen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)