Deletion of Trūata

Comment: A news search does return a number of relatively recent sources. However, the majority of these seem to be of the "republished press-releases as journalism" variety - which is specifically called-out in the Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_independent_sources#Press_releases|relevant INDEPENDENT/CHURNALISM guidelines. For example, the https://www.ft.com/content/576171dc-27ab-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0 FT piece from 15 March overlaps in time/date/content with the https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180315005200/en/Truata-Delivers-Next-Generation-Data-Protection-Analytics-Europe original 15 March press release. And the "company creates 75 jobs" pieces on the https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/data-analytics-firm-to-hire-75-staff-for-dublin-hq-1.3537848 Irish Times. https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2018/0621/972134-new-truata-jobs/ RTÉ and https://www.techcentral.ie/truata-hire-75-new-dublin-office/ elsewhere in June all reflect the https://www.businessworld.ie/news-from-ireland/Tech-company-to-hire-75-personnel-in-Dublin-571005.html June press release by the company. Otherwise the half-dozen other mentions are of a |trivial nature (frankly to be expected in this day and age), and confirm only the |organisation's existence rather than its notability, and provide no evidence of |LASTING relevance. At *best* this seems like a case of |TOOSOON. However, while I am not saying this is the case here, the manner and pattern of this article's creation are very similar to those patterns seen with accounts involved in paid-editing. That pattern, together with the promotional tone of the first revision gives me pause relative to the  guidelines. Firm delete recommendation from me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:TRIVIAL||WP:EXIST||WP:LASTING||WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMO)

Comment: WP:NOTINHERIT|Notability is not inherited so although the names of the companies involved in setting up this company are all notable, there is no indication that this company is notable in its own right. References are not intellectually independent and fail . Wikipedia is not a yellow pages and is not a platform for promotion. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)