Deletion of Karan Acharya (2nd nomination)

Comment: passes  and . It does need weeding of promotion, but that isn't of concern to this AFD. Harshil169 can always improve the article from its current condition
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject is notable. Passes  and  relevant policy  an editor can remove the promotional feel, but that is not a good deletion rationale
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NARTIST||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Subject is notable. Passes  and  but present tone is too promotional. Article must be written from scratch and I will do once this is deleted. This is garbage for Wikipedia now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NARTIST)

Comment: Subject is notable, and passes the encyclopedia criteria . The article needs clean up to remove any promotional language, which is an easy task, and not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: The nom grounds are badly wrong. This is an artist mainly known for ''one work'' - that is not at all what  covers. There seems a good case for him meeting  and , though this is not a conventional fine art career. Irf he is not notable, his best-known graphic probably is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:NARTIST)