Deletion of Riz Story

Comment: it does look like the subject has credits on notable/potentially notable works and has worked with notable people and as part of a notable band, but I don't think he passes  himself in his own right. The citations in the article don't demonstrate notability - they either aren't reliable (the Facebook/YouTube links) or aren't covering the subject in much detail (e.g. the LA Times article, which just mentions his name). I admit I haven't looked at all the huge number of links posted above but the random sample I looked at weren't impressive - again they either weren't reliable, didn't cover the subject in much detail (sometimes just a picture), and many had both problems.As an aside it looks like the subject and his staff have been closely monitoring and controlling the page with the expectation that they would be able to control the content of it. That simply isn't how Wikipedia works: we have our own standards which we stick to, people who work for the subject shouldn't be directly editing articles anyway per , and yes people can write about the subject in a way you don't like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COI)