Deletion of Penrith Museum of Printing

Comment: There's a reasonable account of the place https://camdenhistorynotes.wordpress.com/2018/09/07/penrith-museum-of-printing/ here.  It seems to be low in conventional notability but note that  is a guideline not a policy and so explicitly says that it is "''best treated with common sense, and |occasional exceptions may apply''".  Policies applicable include  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IAR||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Local and specialist museums are a valuable part of the cultural environment, often sustained by the enthusiasm of volunteers, and I regard articles on them as part of the almanac/gazetteer functions here, but it can be awkward to find a suitable level of specific coverage which can independently reference the text and demonstrate |notability. In this case, some coverage exists in External Links, though not sufficient for ; there is also a paywalled 2018 The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)|Daily Telegraph article on "Penrith Museum of Printing's Great Expansion", if someone can access and assess its depth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NORG||:WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: per Andrew Davidson. A case where  is applicable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)