Deletion of Mildred E. Strang Middle School

Comment: for not asserting notability. Without an assertion of notability, it might even be speedyable. And I want to concur with i-said above:  shouldn't be used as an argument in deletion discussions. It's just horribly circular logic. (After it, it essentially reduces to: we should delete this because we usually delete this. Instead of that logic, it'd probably be better to cite the root policy that supports deletion (in this case  or #A7
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:N||WP:CSD)

Comment: and redirect per Silensor and per  as well
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:REDIRECT)

Comment: OUTCOMES should ''never'' be used in discussions, because |by definition, they are not authoritative. But delete anyway because it isn't notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: per  and . First, it's a middle school, which don't get kept. Second, it asserts no notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:N)