Deletion of Aedes canadensis

Comment: per above, but we need to resolve or explain the taxonomic dispute per . Ochlerotatus#Taxonomy seems to be a POV argument that ''Ochlerotatus'' is "accepted", but reading between the lines it's still hotly disputed whether it's a proper genus or a subgenus of ''Aedes''; most recent sources for the species seem to refer to it as ''Aedes (Ochlerotatus) canadensis'' https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Paul_Mutebi/publication/259446454_Detection_of_Eastern_Equine_Encephalitis_Virus_Antibodies_in_Moose_Alces_americana_Maine_2010/links/55145b880cf283ee08355759.pdf http://www.jwildlifedis.org/doi/pdf/10.7589/2012-03-076?code=wdas-site http://www.ivca.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Mosquitoes-of-the-Ohio-River-Basin-Manual.pdf https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c372/5563c70e419d0e13a984cf1bd976b1cf3d43.pdf
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Notable as per . ''"All species that have a correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology) are inherently notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES)

Comment: As per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES)

Comment: inherently notable per . Below are some sources from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Aedes+canadensis%22 Google Scholar. More sources are available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES)