Deletion of December 2017 Melbourne car attack

Comment: we can revisit if it failed 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: As the article creator, I acknowledge that I jumped the gun a little. A number of the keep !votes in this AfD are irrelevant and not policy based, but in my mind the article has passed . Of course  seems to be a higher bar that's trying to filter out sensational coverage of :wikt:flash in the pan|'flash in the pan' events. It's very possible that the government policy impact will probably be sufficient to push it over the line in the long run (e.g. January 2017 Melbourne car attack), but of course  invalidates that argument to a large extent. If we have to delete this and undelete it later then that's not the end of the world, but I'm happy to wait this out per  as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RAPID)

Comment: As per  for now .The  real question  is whether it meet  in the long term ,that is tough to say at this point .But as of now it is  keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:LASTING)

Comment: This one bothers me as 1. A discussion was already started on the issue here: Talk:December 2017 Melbourne car attack, and 2. As I said in said discussion can we wait for at least 24 hours to pass while the story settles? I'm going with  for this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: Arguments by others like  have convinced me. No harm in having this article around to see how things develop. Can always AfD2 in a while. Now, would you all please visit Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Notability of terrorist acts and share your views
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: per . Coverage is extremely wide at this time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)