Deletion of Hitotsubashi Group

Comment: Is this an AfD that is based on the assertion that the article is incorrect? I don't believe that falls under -REASON. Shouldn't that be settled through a discussion on the article talk page? I should note that the link you gave did not work. I also have found other sources that confirm that the article is about the right group: http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/international/international-book-news/article/43551-the-top-seven-japanese-publishing-companies-from-pw-s-global-ranking-2009.html, http://www.themediabriefing.com/companies/shogakukan, http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/financial-reporting/article/52749-global-publishing-leaders-2012-shogakukan-inc.html, etc. Unless there is an argument about notability, perhaps this AfD should be withdrawn
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)