Deletion of Mick Taylor (fictional character)

Comment: and move for cleanup. Fairly notable, but badly written. I encourage editors to clean it up (I won't, because horror films tend to distress me and I'd like to avoid getting involved), but by  he deserves his own page (as the article is long and notable major characters deserve their own articles). Please do not respond to AfDs with "nn;" it isn't very helpful, especially if you don't mention how you've determined that the character is not notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: Yes, but please see the next sentence: "If the article on the work itself becomes long, then giving such characters an article of their own is good practice (if there is enough content for the character)." This is why I pointed that out in my comment. The Wolf Creek article has gotten somewhat long, and while the Mick Taylor article needs some work, there's plenty of material to work with for his own article. Please see the examples in  of major characters being offloaded into separate pages. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: as per  "Major characters and notable minor ones (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction '''should be covered within the article on that work of fiction
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)