Deletion of Muslim Women's National Network Australia

Comment: Article meets , it just needs some copy editing. Don't see where it is pushing its cause
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article comfortably passes  - it has coverage in multiple independent sources and contributes towards fulfilling a significant gap in our coverage. The only grounds given for deletion is that the nominator claims its "designed to advance their cause", despite the fact there's not a shred of evidence for that conclusion. Nominations like this really frustrate me because they make editor retention so difficult: we get a newish editor who writes a bunch of good content about diverse underrepresented topics that badly need some editorial attention, and someone does a drive-by bid to delete their work by making baseless accusations about them - why would they keep contributing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)