Deletion of List of scandals with "-gate" suffix (2nd nomination)

Comment: As majority of the list entries have their own articles (and can safely assume as notable events) this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: the topic is clearly notable.  |Independent, reliable sources show this, just the first page of a Google search shows that the phenomenon of naming scandals "-gate" is a practice notable enough for Wikipedia.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22464422 This, http://public.oed.com/aspects-of-english/english-in-use/the-gate-suffix/ this, http://www.ranker.com/list/gate-scandals/mike-rothschild this, http://people.howstuffworks.com/why-suffix-gate-scandals.htm this, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/01/how-to-name-a-scandal-what-is-a-nbsp-gate-and-what-is-a-ghazi/283104/ this all cover the actual naming phenomenon in-depth and "-gate" scandals receive significant coverage in their own right, such as https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/17/choi-gate-samsung-heir-lee-jae-yong-formally-arrested-for-corruption this, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31729808 this and http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40581816 this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS)