Deletion of Paradigm City

Comment: per thorough search and thought put into what to do with this article.  Follow , and you'll know what articles to delete, I always say
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: and indefinitely protect. Or of the closing admin doesn't want to indefinitely protect, then delete the article and replace it with the redirect. The article fails  as it is based entirely on primary sources and quite possibly contains high amounts of editor-based |interpretations and annalists
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR)

Comment: and '''redirect''' per Farix. The article seems to be only tenuously grounded in |reliable sources, and has zero backing in ''independent'' sources. That makes it |original research or |synthesis at best, with not much prospect for improvement. If the consensus is to redirect it should be deleted first because, as Dandy Sephy has found, the redirect is likely to be reverted when nobody's looking
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: to ''The Big O'' in a section of one or two paragraphs.  Background from primary sources can provide context for full coverage from secondary sources, but a whole article of in-universe information is too excessive and goes against 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)