Deletion of Yung Miraboi Mark

Comment: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. That its the meaning of  which the subject has received significant coverage from different  reliable source such as newspapers and also independent of its subject. The word “Brand manager and motivational speaker” was confirms from the newspapers which are strongly reliable and to proof his notability, for the recommended source to know him in such profession it proof his notable. People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published. Regarding your quoted section in  kindly read Wikipedia:Notability_(people)%23Basic_criteria|Basic Criteria. I found nothing wrong in the awards being nominated, people can be notable with nominations of awards but haven’t won any that doesn’t mean they aren’t suitable to be on Wikipedia. According to my research I see the awards which was being nominated are notable in their region which have been won by other public figure who are also notable and are on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBIO)

Comment: Subject matter fails general notability guidelines per . Please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSON)