Deletion of RollBack Rx

Comment: since it is at the non-notable end of WP software articles (I know, that is a sort of  argument but applicable and usefull in these marginal ones) and there is the well known and well documented |systemic bias towards computing topics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:CSB)

Comment: This article appears to be |non-notable in |reliable sources for |significant coverage requirements, as per SOFT. According to an internet, there are no reliable sources that prove the subject's meeting of significant coverage requirements, so this is not suitable for an article in an encyclopedia. This topic also exists at the :sv:Rollback Rx|Swedish Wikipedia, which I will tag for deletion, although it is not my general language
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT)

Comment: Right now, the referencing consists of product reviews, which means little to me -- products get reviewed, big deal. The article claims that the software uses a patented algorithm, though. If someone can find that patent, I'll buy notability under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)