Deletion of La Demoiselle de magasin

Comment: or merge into ''Along Came Ruth''. As {{u|Eastmain}} pointed out, this was adapted into an English-language play, which turns out to have been produced by Henry W. Savage with at least one song by Irving Berlin. That was then turned into a silent film. In the case of books, being adapted into a notable film is itself a sign of notability ( #3). I'd say that applies to plays as well. As the IP above points out, most RS are likely to be offline given the play's age. The alternative, since we haven't identified specific, in-depth, secondary coverage yet, is to merge into the existing article about the film, but discussing two plays and a film in one article feels slightly clunky. I wouldn't object to that but I would object to a flat deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOKS)

Comment: The article's creator was indeed a miscreant but other editors have, since then, helped. As to the article being a Wikipedia:Stub|stub, that is no reason whatsoever for deletion, even if it's remained a stub for many years. |Some articles are just born this way.  Early 20th century notability is difficult to establish online, yet it's there, per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Demoiselle_de_magasin&diff=852384585&oldid=852304093 re-write
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:PROJSTUB)