Deletion of Arthur Sack A.S.6

Comment: as  violation.  No, I can't say absolutely it's a hoax, but obviously we've questions about verifiability.  I do not believe we ought to keep an article just because it ''might'' be true, since that violates WP-is-not-a-crystal-ball.  I sympathize with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)