Deletion of 99 Percent Declaration

Comment: to Occupy Wall Street. Pointy behavior at best, a POV fork at worst. None of the secondary sources do anything more than mention the phrase "99 Percent Declaration." The article does not satisfy  by itself
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes , meets requirements for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB)

Comment: I have a  and am refraining from any further edits to OWS pages and the page under discussion. (When I edited the OWS page, I was a detached observer. I have since become a partisan and have no desire to become an ctivist) Further, and to be crystal clear, this is not a !vote.Some other editors, who do not seem to have any , appear to have offered comments and "cast" !votes. Some of these contbutors seem unconnected to the edit wars at the OWS and 99% pages. Other contributions seem to be connected to the continuing, disruptive edit wars at the OWS and 99% pages.I'm hoping the closing admin will discount the contributions to this AfD page of anyone with a declared COI.I also hope the closing admin will take an opportunity to remind established editors that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:A||WP:COI)

Comment: because per both  and the specific notability criteria at , the document has been the subject of these non-trivial published reliable  sources independent of the site itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: there is no ''significant'' coverage in |RS about this document
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)