Deletion of Chaim Dov Keller

Comment: Is this a claim of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASSING)

Comment: non notable person, .  Speedy, snowball close, anyone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article notes he is head of the Telshe yeshiva (Chicago), was spokesperson for Agudath Israel of America, and describes his role in Yated Ne'eman (United States). This is easily sufficient notability to satisfy . POV and citation problems can be fixed. An AfD discussion assesses whether the topic is a |notable and |verifiable topic, not whether the current article is a quality article.  Religious sources are considered |reliable sources for religious matters, including whether a religious figure is considered |notable in the field of religion. Notability in the field, not notability in general media, is the standard, and that is met here. There is no problem I can see that can justify a delete vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: The lack of |reliable sources is a major concern here for this subject. There are also |notability issues as well. --|S
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:EA)

Comment: Most of the article is not adequately sourced, and the article as a whole violates  as being a Wikipedian's evaluation of the articles he has written.  Essentially all the content about his views needs to come out until reliable third party sources commenting upon those views are found.  Right now, the article has adequate independent sourcing to demonstrate that he is notable, but not to say anything about his views.  The last bullet of the  section of  is also applicable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SELFPUB||WP:V)