Deletion of Lauren McLean

Comment: per my earlier statement. According to , "''Municipal politicians are not inherently notable just for being in politics, but neither are they inherently non-notable just because they are in local politics. Each case is evaluated on its own individual merits. Mayors of cities of at least regional prominence have usually survived AFD''" For reference, Boise, Idaho is the largest city in Idaho with a population of approximately 205,000. It is also the 97th largest city in an America out of 314 cities with a population over 100,000. Seeing as it is very likely that McLean will become mayor after the December 3rd runoff election, I see no point in deleting the page only to have to recreate it in a few weeks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: u|FOARP}}, Apologies if I was not clear on my previous message above. I was not saying the creator could not discuss the notability of the subject here, but I was respond to User Gbawden "From KidAd's talk page to me:  It is very likely that this woman will be the next mayor of Boise". As we stand today, the subject does not pass  irregardless how we look at it. Without bias or setting a precedence that because opinion indicates the candidate is likely to be nominated then the page should be not be deleted in Wikipedia. If the article need to be recreated again after the election, then it is just a one click away
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in December if she wins the runoff. Candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates; she has to ''win'' the election and thereby ''hold'' the mayoralty to claim notability under our inclusion standards for mayors, and people's ''predictions'' about whether she's ''likely'' to win or not carry no weight. So as of today, the only standard we can judge her against is the one for city councillors — and the standard for city councillors is not being passed, because it requires evidence that she's uniquely much ''more'' notable than most other city councillors. Yes, Boise is a large enough city that its mayors would generally be accepted as passing , so this can certainly be recreated if she actually wins the mayoral election — but as of today, she's still only a mayoral ''candidate'' who has ''not'' passed NPOL yet. And since administrators have the ability to ''restore'' deleted articles with one click of a button if circumstances change, the fact that the article ''might'' have to be recreated in a month is not a reason to exempt her from the normal process today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)