Deletion of Kamino

Comment: plot summary and in-universe detail of a fictional location, no sign of any real-world notability: a couple of Google books links to books which mentioned the planet once in passing is hardly "significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject" per . There's an excellent Free article on the topic at http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kamino if you'd like to contribute to it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: No |reliable and independent sources to establish |notability. Totally in-universe
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: no assertion of notability through non-trivial coverage by |reliable sources independent of the topic. Entire article is #PLOT|excessive plot summary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: as nothing but notable, unoriginally researched |fancruft. Erik the
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: several independent sources have been provided, with the Technophobia book discussing Kamino from an out-of-universe, literary perspective being the best, and I'm sure more will show up in the future. The article could have been much better than it is, but as we all know, |the current state of an article is not a valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM)