Deletion of The Godling Chronicles

Comment: You can find a bunch of reviews of these books easily with a Google search. The (auto?)biographical information about the author is suspicious but insufficient to delete the page in light of . On the other hand if you can prove it's him I would say delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: I did search and while I found two local articles about the series, I didn't actually find anything (else) that would really be usable as a reliable source. The closest I found to a RS was http://forewordliterary.com/tag/the-godling-chronicles/ this link, which was written by someone http://forewordliterary.com/2014/08/breathing-new-life-into-a-bestselling-series/ representing the author so it'd be considered a  source. As I suspected, all of the reviews for this series have been written by various book review blogs, so they've be considered . The thing about SPS is that while they might be well written or entertaining or popular, none of that makes the SPS a reliable source per Wikipedia's guidelines. It's fairly rare that we have a blog that would be considered an exception to this rule and we don't really have any in this instance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:SPS)