Deletion of Kathryn Xian

Comment: Is this Xian the director referred to http://books.google.com/books?id=PGd4-qtfyzIC&pg=PA160&dq=%22Kathryn+Xian%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=m-eIU-jzLpDzoASlvIGACg&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Kathryn%20Xian%22&f=false, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-89145879.html  She appears to be so.  http://books.google.com/books?id=x2vYAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Kathryn+Xian%22&dq=%22Kathryn+Xian%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=m-eIU-jzLpDzoASlvIGACg&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBg.  There's a very small but non-zero number of references to it at paywalled journal articles.   The article may need work, but I'd imagine those sources, plus the ones already in the article, meet , and unless someone wants to dispute that this is the same Xian, I'd suggest '''keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: It's nice that she is an activist for worthy causes, but our standard for inclusion here is . That basically requires coverage, namely, |significant coverage about her from independent reliable sources. She is mentioned here and there by local news media (primarily by alternative media, rather than mainstream media like the TV stations and the Star-Advertiser). She is such a long shot in that seven-person primary race that pollsters don't even include her name when they take a poll.http://www.civilbeat.com/2014/05/civil-beat-poll-donna-mercado-kim-still-frontrunner-race-congress/ At this time she is simply not notable as Wikipedia defines it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:42)