Deletion of Zoran Dragelj

Comment: Does not meet |general notability guidelines. Not |reliable sources found in a https://www.google.com/search?q=Zoran+Dragelj&oq=Zoran+Dragelj&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3.482j0j4&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#tbm=nws&q=%22Zoran+Dragelj%22 Google search. Appears to be an |autobiography with an obvious |conflict of interest here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:AUTOBIO||WP:COI)

Comment: Zoran is not completely below the radar as some media has taken note. I did find http://www.croatia.org/crown/oldphotos/zoranDrageljClipping.jpg THIS, but one media article does not a notability establish.  {{ping|Zoran75}} while your personal accomplishments are laudable, Wikipedia is not a who's who, nor a place to |promote yourself. Read  and the related essay ikipedia is not about YOU. If your displayed works themselves receive commentary and analysis in independent |reliable sources, you may be able to establish notability under . If the purported awards are major enough, you may be able to establish notability under ... '''BUT''' Wikipedia is |not a place to host your resume nor every moment of your life
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:PROMOTE||WP:COI||WP:W||WP:RS||WP:CREATIVE||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NOTHOST)

Comment: Zoran, I will attempt to lay out to you as clearly as possible. As others have said, this reads like a resume since you've basically provided it to us word for word.  is a key element of Wikipedia. You must be notable as deemed by significant third party sources, not because you believe you are. You have largely been the only editor who has edited the articles related to Zoran Dragelj, save for those that that have added minor changes such as categories. Given that you created this article in 2005 and have repeatedly attempted to stop its deletion, without anyone else contesting this deletion, should suggest to you that you do not in fact meet . For instance, your film Celluloid Souls, released in 1997 (which also has been nominated for deletion Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Celluloid_Souls|here) has https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGCQ6aAqrGM '''75''' views on Youtube since you posted it in '''April 2007.''' This means you are averaging 10 views a year (two of which are my own in fact). This clearly does not qualify it as notable. Also, as a useful tip, use the 4 tildes (~) at the end of your comment rather than at the beginning, as you would in an "offline signature
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:N)

Comment: per lack of |reliable source coverage. Simple existence is not an inclusion freebie on Wikipedia; |notability is a factor of media ''coverage''. No prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' a properly sourced article can be written, but we are not a public relations database on which anybody is ''entitled'' to post an article about themselves without passing our inclusion and sourcing rules
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: My intention was never to keep Wikipedia page as a resume since I have LinkedIn page for it, just to present progress and developments to the international galleries, academia, exhibition and lecture halls where I am invited to present and discuss about my work."'' - I think that is a useful endeavour but one for which Wikipedia is ill-suited. Wikipedia is not to be used as as an |advertisement tool. I would suggest having your own website where you can provide such information for parties that are interested in it. While I congratulate you on your successful career, having a successful career is itself not particularly notable. Otherwise, every PEng, doctor, realtor or accountant with 20 years of experience would qualify for a Wikipedia article. In addition, your claim that the Celluloid Souls was only ''recently'' added to YouTube seems to significantly stretch the meaning of ''recently''. It was added on April 15, 2007 to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGCQ6aAqrGM YouTube and has 78 views (it had 73 when I first clicked on it yesterday, and I've now clicked on it several times just to provide this information). In total, since your YouTube account was created on March 6, 2006 you have 26 subscribers who have viewed your entire selection of videos a combined https://www.youtube.com/user/zoxx/about 22,451 times. Given that short films appear to be your main interest, such numbers are extremely low to qualify for , especially given that the content is free and the films quite short. I have made my points several times. I am going to leave this discussion and debate to others in the Wikipedia community who are more experienced and informed on these matters. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:N)