Deletion of Species forest

Comment: as non-notable . -- Special:Contributions/202.124.72.221|202.124.72.221
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: spaced ndash}} as a neologism that isn't able to be sourced, per . Sorry, but the term isn't in wide use whatsoever and there are apparently no reliable sources about the term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: This unsourced definition is nonsense: of course a forest is occupied by species (what else?). And what on earth does "existing and recently wikt:extant|extant" mean? , I'm afraid. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.72.138|202.124.72.138
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: Yup, the commentary on the talk page pretty much sounds like , 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:OR)

Comment: per nom and RooDog2k. Also, if it were to be a definition it would not justify an article per . Poor quality articles such as this are doing WP disservice. Please, lets get some sort of peer review in place to stop this stort of rubbish from turning up in article namespace
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)