Deletion of Barry Gurary

Comment: When you remove all the unsourced stuff there is little left; he is not personally of much relevance. If the library incident is encyclopedic (which I doubt) an article could be created under the name of Chabad library controversy using only |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: While doing research, I noticed that Barry's case is described in several Wikipedia artices ans a notable event, and the versions differ. This article must stay for purely wikipedia's policy |no forking. We must have a consistent story, don't we? Therefore it must be in a '''single''' place, referred from everywhere
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: Not only is he barely notable (I can't find almost any of the details by google searching even on the more scandal mongering anti-chabad sites) but the complete lack of sources runs afoul of . Claiming he went in clandestinely to steal books with no source at all? That's such a BLP issue it isn't funny
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Compared with the garage bands, webcomics, dorm rooms, and other stuff that regularly comes up for deletion, notability here is no problem. No-one's aerioualy challenging the existence of enough |reliable sources etc. I disagree with claims that notability has to be based on what people do. As no less an authority on notability than Sherlock Holmes pointed out, what the dog didn't do in the night is just as notable as what it did do. The consequences of bowing out can be just as historically important, and notable, as bow-wowing in. As with dogs, so with would-be heirs to the Lubavitcher dynasty. Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)