Deletion of Mary Hammond (Tuam)

Comment: per nom, , ,  and . The claim to notability here seems to be that the subject was the victim of an assault which (likely) lead to the stillbirth of her child. During the Irish Rebellion of 1641. During the 1641 uprising, many thousands of people (including landowners/etc) were attacked. And many were killed. It is not clear to me at all how this individual victim is any more notable than the thousands of others. The related guidelines are clear that, if a subject is only notable for one event (like being the victim of a crime or similar), then that doesn't meet . Mine is a firm "delete" recommendation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BIO1E||WP:VICTIM||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: per , , and . I agree it's a sad tale, but Irish history is filled with sad stories, including ancestors of mine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV)