Deletion of Church chairs

Comment: Per ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTE||WP:RS)

Comment: the admin in me sees an essay filled with|original research, lacking |references and written in a bizarre tone, but the jokester in me is insistant that an article with phrase "Joshua Gabrielson of CFMA conducted research across a five year period and found that out of the 342,000 plus churches about 46% of churches today have chairs in their facilities," is somehow worth keeping around. Oh well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SOURCE)

Comment: I added prod to this with the reason "Does not fit |notability guidelines.  No reputable |sources".  Also fails with , , and .  There might even be a Conflict of Interest, when the author removed my prod he gave the reason "Made changes to add to the verifiability as I am the author of the research of CFMA
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:SOURCES||WP:ORIGINAL||WP:V||WP:IRS)

Comment: Article appears to be |original research and also fails |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: Article not only fails , but also  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:OR)