Deletion of Kalki Avtar aur Muhammad sahib (book)

Comment: As per , with the additional of the new sources article now meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN||WP:GNG)

Comment: deletion entry is 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: as failing . This is certainly a |fringe publicafotion but that by itself would not be an argument to delete it. In fact, if it had indeed been banned by the Indian government and the resultant controversy had been extensively covered, or resulted in Streisand effect-style fame r the book, that could have been a reason to retain the article. However, I have looked and none of the claims in the current version of the article are verifiable through a reliable source; there appears to be no popular/academic media coverage of the book, or any reviews aside from the lone opinion column in http://www.milligazette.com/Archives/2005/01-15Feb05-Print-Edition/011502200574.htm Milli Gazette (itself a pretty fringe-y publication, which is not a reliable source for facts. Note also that the 2005 Mili Gazette column says that the book is "recently published" and has "lot of hue and cry all over India". The former contradicts the wikipedia article, which says the book was published/banned in 1969, and the latter is unverifiable and almost surely false, since it seems impossible that such recent national controversy wouldn't leave a trace online.) So the article needs to be deleted unless better sources are found prior to the closing of this afd
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOKS||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Without going any further, it simply doesn't even pass  due to a lack of coverage. If it can't make it past that first hump, the decision to delete shouldn't be too difficult
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)