Deletion of Lost on Mars

Comment: To be fair, the film is mentioned in a few articles by the ''Journal Gazette & Times-Courier'' (links are in the Wikipedia article), but I am not sure this local coverage qualifies per , which says the topic must be more than "a mere short-term interest". Lack of reviews in particular indicate this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE)

Comment: per MOS:FILM#Production|its production having ''some'' coverage but generally failing  by not having more. While we might congratulate filmmaker Erik Shook for his attempt at creating something on a budget, inclusion criteria require a bit more notice from reliable sources. {{ping|Dream Focus}}  Dead links were easy enough to correct using The Wayback Machine, but being dead was a strong indicator that media interest was lacking.  {{ping|Scantunl}} please take a look and '''study''' how I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lost_on_Mars&type=revision&diff=686451510&oldid=6861660977 '''addressed some issues''' per MOS:FILM.  If there are reviews from Europe or Asia (even if |non-English), please offer them. '''IF''' deleted and if you'd like to work away from attentive eyes as you improve and seek assistance, I'd be happy to place it in your |userspace as a draft. But in lacking a lot more coverage, deletion seems likely
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NONENG||WP:USERSPACE)