Deletion of Bentiromide (data page)

Comment: or maybe '''Merge'''.  The data is verifyable, tells about the compound, so I don't see why this would not be encyclopedic (and that goes for other datapages as well).  I really don't see where this fits into #INFO, NONE of these points apply, the closest I get is point 4, instruction manual.  But there it does state "while Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things" (this is a thing, IMHO), which would be in favour of keeping, since it is not one of the not-items following that statement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This is a not hem data page, although many of those would also be subject to the comments made about this one. hem data pages should not be "''indiscrimate''" commections of data: they came into being because the {{tl|chembox}} was becoming ridiculously long, and yet people still wished to add more data to it (in fact, they still do). Other science projects, notably Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements|WikiProject Elements, use the (data page) suffix to give basic data which might otherwise be the subject of revert wars over sources. This approach has been in use for a couple of years now without obvious problems
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:C)