Deletion of List of famous brahmins

Comment: I assume "famous" is synonymous with "notable" in WP parlance as I assume it is in all articles and categories, so that aspect doesn't bother me - just rename without the word "famous".  Indeed, I thought that the norm at WP anyway.  We have lots of lists of things that would be very numerous unless we implied a notability requirement: e.g, by race, religion, affiliation, e.g., List of Yale University people, and myriad others.  That said, do we extend our racial, ethnic, and religious classifications to caste classifications? I am a strong proponent of doing away with these categories, but isn't it evidence of  to permit categories of non-Westerners on the bases of categories that "matter" to our majoritarian Western minds but delete categorizations of Indian people according to the native classification scheme
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: Brahmin is just a Hindu social class (varna in Hinduism|varna), not an ethnic group, clan or organization. Brahmin was the priestly class in Vedic times, but in modern times, "Brahmin" varna doesn't indicate anything (ethnic status, occupation etc.). This is like having List of famous middle-class people. |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)