Deletion of Cold Fusion (Doctor Who)

Comment: Simply, where does it specifically refer to "Cold Fusion"? Not your  or what you think/believe. Quite simply, where in the article does it specifically refer to "Cold Fusion" by name? Nowhere
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: My comments are entirely true. I removed much CRUFT, which was both entirely in-universe and completely unsourced. As I stated earlier, the BBC link is certainly a , but all it does is mention in passing that Parkin wrote Cold Fusion. It is not in any way an article about Cold Fusion. The "not in citation given" tags are because while the website listed is itself of far-from-certain reliability, nowhere did it specifically mention Cold Fusion. I suggest Bendegezou look at a thing called , and another called 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:OR)

Comment: Ohwrotcod removed the plot synopsis: having a plot synopsis is standard for novel articles and not fancruft. The (archived) BBC link is an interview with Parkin. It is not about ''Cold Fusion'', but covers ''Cold Fusion'' among several of his works. There is a question and an answer on ''Cold Fusion''. It is entirely wrong to say that "all it does is mention in passing that Parkin wrote Cold Fusion." I discuss the not-in-citation tags and other edits at Talk:Cold Fusion (Doctor Who). The article does not name the book as ''Cold Fusion'', but it is very clearly referring to this novel. Ohwrotcod also added a  tag for material that is taken directly from the source given
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)