Deletion of Dana S. Nau

Comment: Meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed), and probably other criteria as well. Citation impact http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sauthors=%22Dana+S.+Nau%22 clearly indicates notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Full disclosure: I am not Dana Nau, but I am one of his many former research students; it should be obvious from my edit history that I have only a passing familiarity with Wikipedia.  I assume (though I don't know) that Dsnpost was Dana Nau, and clearly any self-promotion in Wikipedia is fraught with peril.  That said, I read , and Dana Nau seems to qualify for notability rather easily, both by criterion 1 (see his http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3Anau+author%3Adana citation statistics, as well as the references to SHOP2 and some of his other work at Hierarchical task network) and, as a AAAI fellow, for criterion 3.  Philosophically, though, I don't know where Wikipedia stands on articles that should have been created, but probably not by the editor who created them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Yeah, I agree this guy passes  by a country mile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)