Deletion of List of British mobsters (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are some completely invalid deletion arguments above. Deletion is based on whether the ''topic'' has notability, not the state of a Wikipedia article at any one time. I don't see that Gangs in the United Kingdom is in any danger of being deleted as non-notable, and this list clearly has reasonable overlap with Gangs_in_the_United_Kingdom#Organised_crime_groups|much of the material we have already deemed acceptible for inclusion. I don't think  was followed well here, if it was referenced at all. AFD is not concerned with whether an individual entry might possibly be mistakenly added to a list (otherwise List of clowns would be speedied to prevent editors from adding anyone they disliked to it). The basic topic has clear notability, it's reasonable to admit that a large number of subjects are decades past having BLP considerations, and the history of British organized crime is covered extensively by multiple reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Not only was the list a gross violation of WP:BLP policy (containing entirely unsourced allegations of serious criminality), but 'mobster' is in any case an entirely subjective term, appropriate perhaps for tabloid headlines but of no encyclopaedic merit given its self-evident vagueness. Inclusion on the list seems to have been based on nothing but 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)