Deletion of Mitt Romney FEMA and Hurricane Sandy controversy

Comment: Mitt Romney and his campaign is going to receive press coverage and whether Wikipedia has a stand-alone political article on a biography part of his life or campaign should be judge on whether the topic is an appropriate spin out article of any of Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012, Political positions of Mitt Romney, Public image of Mitt Romney, Electoral history of Mitt Romney, or Governorship of Mitt Romney. This topic is not an appropriate spin out article of any relevant Wikipedia article and, as such, does not meet . The election is November 6, 2012 and to prevent gaming the Wikipedia system to keep the topic live until November 6, 2012, snow delete now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per #NEWS,  & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RECENTISM||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: There's been significant coverage, but Wikipedia is . More importantly, it's not clear that this controversy, which does rely on synthesis to a degree, will have any lasting . Merge anything verifiable that's not already covered in the campaign and presidential race articles and delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EFFECT)

Comment: Seriously, what the fuck?  ''Every'' nutty or semi-nutty thing a politician says nowadays is now memorialized in article form?   and the traditional "not news" thing.  At least common sense is ruling the day here for a change, unlike the "binders of women" discussion.  Delete this and ban the creator from political articles til the new year, please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: silly, POV, election-related |synth. There are "reliable sources" but not ones giving coverage to this subject - they cover a range of disparate subjects tenuously connected by this article alone. Even if there had been a couple of editorials giving credence to the idea as a standalone subject, it would still probably struggle against accusations of  and #NEWS. |Trout for Halloween dinner methinks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOT||WP:TROUT)

Comment: and give Casprings a slap with a .  I am so glad the election is almost over, this kind of crap is really getting old.  Just to add, that this had absolutely nothing to do with hurricane Sandy.  Romney made the comment months ago, and apparently it was not a controversy then.  The only reason it is being put forth is because the election is in a week and it is an attempt to make political points
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)