Deletion of Gino Polli

Comment: it may be due to the language barrier but this article doesn't really establish what the subject is claimed to be notable for (not to mention some tone issues). Regardless, there does seem to be only a very limited number of sources which mention the subject, and at that the main ones are from the 1920s, which seems indicative of a lack of "significant coverage" to me per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this is yet another in a group of recent articles, challenged but invariably defended (although sometimes deleted or re-directed), which inflate and synthesize isolated factoids about a non-notable Italian family, location or person and list bibliographies and footnotes which don't substantiate the significance, history or connections alleged in the articles, e.g. rticles for deletion/Museo Giannino Castiglioni|Museo Giannino Castiglioni, rticles for deletion/Bianco di Lierna|Bianco di Lierna, Talk: Principality of Sperlinga|Principality of Sperlinga, Talk: Lierna Castle #Stalking|Lierna Castle, Talk: House of Natoli#Affiliation is not identification|Lordship of Nanteuil (re-directed to House of Natoli). Apparently no one has found the time or means yet to interrupt this pattern, which continues to distract editors from improving the encyclopedia. If it can't be stopped, it should at least not suck up time from more productive contributions to Wikipedia. Delete. Swiftly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:A)