Deletion of Sonic Entity

Comment: The article fails . Reliable secondary sources are not present in the article or online. The article also fails criteria 2 of . Beatport is not a national music chart and shouldn't be treated as such
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: As an entertainment historian I cannot find sources sufficient on mainstream searches or even in data bases meant only for researchers such as myself to validate notability. This subject fails  and . The fact that the record labels have the subject on them does not make the subject notable. I cannot find any notables associated with those labels. The record labels may have a hint of notability and if anything this artists should be redirected and included into an article about the labels. Sorry, but this may even fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: ping|prokaryotes}}. The subject of this article is simply not notable. Sonic Entity hasn't gained significant coverage in reliable sources. Your claim that he meets the fifth criteria of  is inaccurate. I agree that Iono Music has been around for more than a few years. However, the roster of artists Iono Music houses are not independently notable. As a matter of fact, Iono Music isn't a notable record label. (Being around for a long time doesn't equate to notability). A Google search of the label fails to establish notability. FYI: Notability is not inherited. The Progressive/PsyTrance genre may be notable, but that doesn't mean Sonic Entity is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)