Deletion of Unnecessary war

Comment: This is an interesting case. This reads like |original content and aren't any sources directly about this topic. It's a bit like an ESSAY as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This article doesn't even stick to its ostensible topic, but instead switches to editorializing in favor of tax choice (violating |neutral point of view). If, somehow, this article manages to get kept, it needs to be revised to avoid |systemic bias -- every war that this article suggests may have been an "unnecessary war" is a war that the United States engaged in during the last 65 years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BIAS)

Comment: see  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY||WP:NOTSOAPBOX)

Comment: I think the deletion arguments in fact illustrate uneasiness with the article's title, which indeed contains an implicit opinion. It should rather have been called "Necessity of War". This is indeed a notable philosophical issue that has been debated for millenia (Plato devoted a book to it). This article should contain a summary of various notable opinions on the issue. At most it should be renamed. The topic is adjacent to Bellum iustum but is distinct from it. |Imperfection does not mean the debate does not exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: per nom.   I will state though that philosophers have for centuries been debating the question of what constitutes a "just war", and conversely, what makes some wars "unjust" or "unnecessary".  A rewritten article referencing prominent philosophers discussing this topic could be encyclopedic and satisfy .  However, just war theory already covers this subject reasonably well, so introducing an overview of this philosophical debate into the article in question would simply be redundant.  Moreover, my Google searches do not suggest that "unnecessary war" has become a widely adopted phrase, so I don't see the need for a redirect to just war theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)