Deletion of Avro Vulcan XM655

Comment: as a notable museum exhibit.  the fact that there are not articles about other Vulcans is no a valid reason to delete this. There was an article about the Vulcan Restoration Trust, operators of XL426, and hence also about XL426, but this was deleted last year due to a copyright infringement, not because of a lack of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: The fact XL426 doesn't have its own article is |not important. What is important is whether XM655 is notable enough for its own article - and it appears to me that it |does manage to pass the GNG as a rare surviving example of a large, distinctive aircraft
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:GNG)