Deletion of Cassandra paradox

Comment: as a clear violation of , if not also of  and . The single source is insufficient and unbalanced, and as nom indicates, if we were to remove the POV elements in this article, there'd be nothing left. It's basically an Internet pop culture bandwagon, Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow|full of sound and fury, signifying ... nothing. It can't be made into a good article because other sources mean different things by the term so it would become a ragbag of unrelated materials
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:N)