Deletion of Karen Arnold (2nd nomination)

Comment: to Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion where she is listed - no other notability - does not meet  (no "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject") - therefore, Redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: since subject fails . She is known strictly for a rather non-notable award. I see Keep suggestions based on the fact that |this is not a paper encyclopaedia. This is a standard excuse for trying to include everything under the sun, irrespective of the notion of |verifiable |notability mandated by Wikipedia, i.e. {{tq|information should not be included in this encyclopedia solely because it is true or useful}}; the "not-paper" attribute {{tq|is not a free pass for inclusion}}. |Most importantly, |Wikipedia is not a collection of randomly collected biographies and information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPERSON||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:V||WP:N||WP:POLICY||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: passes  received a  well-known and significant award or honor Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion only a handful of people receive the award. Subject is also the chief executive of a charity  also received an honorary degree. Article is sourced. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: Can someone provide links to this |"significant coverage" because all I can find are mere mentions that she won the award and so am currently erring on the side of delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)