Deletion of Ted Schmidt

Comment: Seriously folks? ''Threats?'' Someone needs to be blocked for a while, or forever, what ever suits the admins' fancy. What I see when I read this article is an un-notable person with marginally noticable family members. I also see a  violation. As for the issue of the Miami Herald, trust me on this one, it's reliability as a legitimate source is ''questionable'' at best. Read it. Really, don't, it's not worth it. In conclusion, grow up please, making threats over the internet because of this seems remarkably childish
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: the article about the real person and '''restore redirect''' to the TV character. The living Ted Schmidt shows no particular evidence of |notability, such as third-party press discussing him specifically and nontrivially rather than merely mentioning him in the context of an article about something else. And sharing a name with a fictional character is neither a good reason to create an article about a non-notable person, nor a good reason to create a separate disambiguation page in violation of our guidelines that a dab page have entries for three or more notable topics, nor a good reason to get rid of the redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)