Deletion of Edwin Curry

Comment: per Ottawa4ever, the spirit of  would apply in this instance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: there is no possible way to way to construct a complete biography of this man, only his crimes are notable, which therefore equals . As for the notability for perpetrators of crimes (), he doesn't fit any of the criteria. He isn't notable beyond the crime itself, he is not a renowned world figure, and it is not (and won't be) a historical event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:PERP)

Comment: I think  still applies. The event, in this case, can be said to be Curry's trial, which appears to be of only immediate interest (I can't imagine anyone taking an interest in this 15 years from now). In response to Wnt above, this guy does not at all compare to Eric Harris/Dylan Klebold and John Wayne Gacy. Harris and Klebold were involved in an event that's unquestionably significant on its own (BLP1E says bios are appropriate for "Individuals notable for well-documented events"). Gacy has had whole books written about him, and attracted far more attention than this guy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and . Horrible crimes over many years, and they took place many years ago. Yet the few references for the crime or the criminal are only from a 5 day period. The crimes inspired no societal changes, no new laws, no books or films. Apparently the news media which gave it little coverage did not see it as significant as some Wikipedians do. The crimes may have taken place over a long period, but none was apparently considered notable enough for any coverage until the trial and conviction. Neither the perpetrator nor the victims apparently had any notability outside the crimes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: clearly, obviously notable individual (unfortunately), which passes  (several sources),  (not a single event; sources are all from his recent conviction, but the crimes are not recent and are ''very many''; sources referring to him and his personality also are cited) and  (notable crimes). The crimes were notable enough for the sentence to have been further discussed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:PERP)