Deletion of Einat Haran

Comment: I disagree with that interpretation of . Its true that the text at  says 'departed friends and relatives', but that doesn't mean the logic disappears if it is applied in a broader sense. The basic essence of  imho is that articles should be encyclopediatic, not obituaries. The notion that inclusion in Wikipedia is an issue of 'justice' or 'recognition' is a misunderstanding. No-one disputes that this event is an extreme human tragedy, but that doesn't mean that the guidelines of wikipedia are to be thrown out of the window
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL)

Comment: This child is |not notable for anything other than this one event, and this event would have been no less notable if any other child had been killed in the same circumstances. On the other hand, the killing is clearly notable in itself, having gained international attention from newspapers with |good reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. Also, I note that this girl's name is a likely search term. Considering all of this, a merge/redirect is the best course of action. No opinion on where to redirect to
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:RS)

Comment: Copying the following passage from : "If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted. Marginal biographies on people with no independent notability can give undue weight to the events in the context of the individual, create redundancy and additional maintenance overhead, and cause problems for our neutral point of view policy. In such cases, a redirect or merge are usually the better options. Cover the event, not the person." In the case of this article, is there ''any'' reputable source that relates to Haran in any other respect than her death
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Please read: . Samir Kuntar is a typical case of "one man one event" and I guess that so is Einat Haran, it is a matter of fact that both the victim and the murderer have been very notable in nearly 30 years now. The Nasser Operation for itself as a search term has been much less notable. One could argue that there were "more events" related, eg. the 2nd Lebanon war and others for Samir and diverse appeal from public and family on the case for Einat. However the main event here is the Nahariya Terror Attack (listed in WP as Nasser Operation). If one is to have only one article covering all the events and people related,  why would you pick one person and make him "the event". It does not make sense and it may even confuse the readers, if you notice most of the arguments on the Samir Kuntar discussion page was about adding material which does not fit into a biographical article...  So the question is: does WP want to limit all this event and its involved, notable people into a one biographical page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I heavily un-|poved the article, but I do not think it's worth keeping. At the moment Nasser operation is not a good target, but I hope Tkalisky is going to expand it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: to Nasser Operation.  All of the merged material either needs |sourcing or removal.  '''~a
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)