Deletion of ABC Riverina

Comment: I strongly recommend that you withdraw this |AFD as it will ultimatley result in a '''keep''' closure. If you have an issue with the articles, I'd suggest doing them seperatley or taking this to another discussion for merger or redirects. This is obviously not going to close as a delete, and I'm half tempted myself to close this as a snow keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: Per all above. I concur that large numbers of independent reliable sources are likely to be available for most, if not all. A number of the articles already have been expanded and referenced justifying their retention. I'd strongly suggest that the nominator withdraw this |AFD and that an evaluation of each article be undertaken on a case by case basis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: This is ''not'' a deletion discussion; it is clearly a merge proposal as evidenced by the nominator's rationale and should have been the subject of a merge discussion, not listing at AfD. As per , the nominator has failed to advance an argument for deletion and has only proposed a non-deletion action i.e. merging. No one other than the nominator has recommended that the pages be deleted so this is clearly a speedy keep and should be closed as such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:KEEP)