Deletion of Jinyoung Englund

Comment: The subject was profiled by the Korea Times, the Hill,  and the Northwest Asian Weekly prior to her campaign for office. In addition, her campaign received international coverage from the Korea Daily.  The international coverage of the campaign, and multiple profiles in national papers (especially before 2017), lend itself to a  pass. Additionally, each subject needs to be evaluated on their own merits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Every'' candidate in ''any'' election is ''always'' going to garner some degree of coverage, because covering elections is a big part of what the media is ''for'', but candidates are not automatically deemed notable just because that coverage exists — candidacy-related coverage is |run of the mill for election candidates, because it's simply ''expected'' to exist for ''any'' person who's running as a candidate whether she has a substantive and enduring notability claim or not. What we've got here, however, is almost entirely a mix of routine and almost exclusively local candidacy-related coverage of exactly the type and volume that matches what's ''expected'', |primary sources that cannot assist notability at all, and glancing namechecks of her existence in references that aren't substantively ''about'' her. The only source here that ''actually'' establishes any real notability at all, by passing all three of the "substantively ''about'' her", "from a reliable source" and "not just about her candidacy" tests, is the ''Korea Times'' article — but ''one'' source doesn't singlehandedly confer a  pass all by itself. So no prejudice against recreation on or after election day if she ''wins'' the seat, but nothing here constitutes a compelling reason why she would already qualify for an article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG)

Comment: doesn't meet .  A candidate for a state legislature will almost never be notable as a result of their candidacy.  I don't see a case for notability based on her Bitcoin work either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)