Deletion of Yvonne Bradley

Comment: The Guantanamo tribunals are notable.  She is not.  This is a disturbing trend I'm seeing, where a lawyer is getting a wikipedia article for no other reason than taking part in a ''case'' that is worthy of a wikipedia article, as though notability were contagious. Just because her case was notable does not mean that she is.  The article is also loaded with POV puffery.  "Promises Kept" as a section?  Yow. If you stripped out the POV stuff, there would be very little left. If you then took out her  single notable case, there'd be nothing left but her name, rank and serial number
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Really?  The article has zero biographical facts other than her current job title.  The cited "profile" is http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/yvonne-bradley exactly two sentences long.  That's not 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Uh, it doesn't get any better than this for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)