Deletion of Tammy Jennings

Comment: Based on speculative / that the Greens will win this, almost entirely based on opinion polls with small sample sizes, to justify an article which ordinarily would fail A7. I don't think it is "guaranteed" - they won a seat for the first time ever in this chamber in 2006 based almost entirely on preference flows from another candidate, who of course isn't running this time. This article relies on non-EL sources such as Linkedin and Youtube to provide any information at all, and doesn't (and can't) even include basic biographical information. On that basis I'm arguing deletion per . (Since several people are linking the two, I voted "provisionally keep or userfy" in Kelly O'Dwyer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:CBALL||WP:BIO)

Comment: per common sense. Deleting this article when it is almost certain that the subject will soon pass  would, in my view, be a classic example of putting overly strict adherence to policies ( – even if it applied which I think is doubtful) ahead of common sense. She might even pass notability before the election takes place if her candidacy receives sufficient coverage to get her over the  line.  Let the article run until the election. If for some unexpected reason the candidate fails, bring it back to AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)

Comment: unless there are at least a few  refs indicating notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Per my commments above. This is nothing more than . No problem restoring the article if / when she passes  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BIO||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: primarily on the basis of .  If she wins or gets enough coverage the article can be undeleted; there's no reason to create an article like this ahead of the actual event that will make her notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Non-notable politician who does not meet . If and when she is elected, the article can be re-created/restored. Hair-splitting about "almost certain" etc. dont refute the basic argument that speculating about election results is crystal-balling. Elections are funny things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)