Deletion of Free Range Studios

Comment: Currently it's spam that fails  with some tinges of WP:VANITY as well by the employees working on the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The article reads like it was written by an advertising firm.  It's clearly not  and it looks a lot like .  Many of the claims lack |verifiability and could be considered |original research.   It's not very encyclopedic.  Publishing both a "Mission Statement" and a "Vision Statement", in addition to a listing of employees and an accompanying image, all seem a bit ANITY.  It appears that this company has produced some interesting material, but so have countless other advertising firms around the world.  I'm not seeing anything particularly distinguishing here, despite the numerous examples of  used to describe their work.  If the article could be rewritten in a more neutral, less commercial tone, I would vote to keep it.  —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ADS||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:VANITY||WP:PEACOCK)

Comment: After initially being skeptical, having read the entire article and going through the sources I can say say this is a notable company that passes .  It needs a NPOV rewrite though as in some places it reads as if it was written by someone who works for the company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)