Deletion of CT Coalition

Comment: per #a7.  Entirely non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Welcome to Wikipedia, Poonqwerty. The trouble with this article is that there are no reliable sources, which are a requirement of the |notability guideline. while the facts might match up with what you've heard, this is |original research which is not enough to support the inclusion of the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: as per . Does not return any Google searches apart from the Wikipedia page (removing results with 'Connecticut' in title - see http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=ct+coalition+-connecticut&meta= here) so it is obviously non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: per . No secondary sources are provided and a newspaper archive search reveals no mentions of any such gang. This casts serious doubt on the claims of "special significance to Law Enforcement" and "the most notorious gang in southwest Sydney". The statement that the "gang" has a large Leumeah cell "the name of which is unknown" does not imply a very high profile for the organisation. Even if the "gang" is genuine the entire article is |original research, especially the history section referring to the flurry of name changes due to "online gaming/nerd" concerns. The constant changing of the names of the leaders suggests the authors of the article are simply making it up as they go along. Plus, the assertion that members of "the most notorious gang in southwest Sydney" were recruited through the online MUD Runescape? Somewhere in a school in Campbelltown there's a 15 year old having a laugh at Wikipedia's expense. Wikipedia is not for |things made up in school one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:OR||WP:MADEUP)