Deletion of P.K.(2014 film)

Comment: I do have to say that for a film that hasn't started yet, there's an enormous amount of sources for this film. I know that the norm of  is to delete articles that haven't yet started filming, but there are a lot of somewhat lengthy articles for this. I haven't made up my mind yet, but I think that at the very least we should either userfy or incubate this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: through the |persistant and in-depth coverage of this topic which would have it seem a |reasonable exception to . Howevem, at the very least we could '''|incubate''' or '''|userfy''' for a short time.  Point #1: We do P.K.(2014 film)#References|already have enough coverage so that we serve our readers to encourage the topic be written of in related articles. Point #2: Outright deletion of such a |well-covered topic does not serve the project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FFCLARIFY||WP:NFF||WP:ATD||WP:USERFY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Spectacular fail of . I've seen cometary orbit predictions with more substance. Please |hit this with a hammer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:HAMMER)