Deletion of Keith Ferrazzi

Comment: While the article may be poorly written, I don't agree that it's overly promotional. Seems to be plenty of sources to show he passes : http://www.independent.ie/business/in-the-workplace/watch-knowledge-isnt-enough-you-need-daily-change-to-achieve-success-thought-leader-keith-ferrazzi-35253713.html ''Irish Independent''; http://www.irishexaminer.com/business/ireland-urged-to-embrace-failure-by-motivational-speaker-keith-ferrazzi-439024.html ''Irish Examiner'', http://www.influencive.com/true-impact-comes-work-arent-recognized/ ''Influencive'', https://www.forbes.com/sites/dorieclark/2014/06/30/the-professionals-guide-to-networking/#63334f003225 ''Forbes''; http://www.businessinsider.com/never-eat-alone-author-biggest-networking-mistake-2017-5 ''Business Insider''. And that’s just on pages 1 & 2 of the google search. The guy’s written for ''Forbes'', ''Business Insider'', ''Inc.'', ''Financial Times'', ''Fortune'', ''Huffington Post'' and ''Entrepreneur'', all of which consider him an expert in his field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Any time on the NY Times list is significant, but primarily because at elast three of the cources already cited in the article seem in more than sufficient depth to pass the . And the find soures search reveals several others, blus at least some book sources. I don't relaly belive that a  search was done here, or else everythign was jsut dismissed because marketing is this person's field, so "its all just marketing". Well there can be notable marketers, and here is one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per ; the page exists to promote the subject's speaking gigs. Wikipedia is not a speakers' bureau
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM)