Deletion of Lorca Cohen

Comment: I concur that the four closely timed edits, apparently by the subject herself, do not condemn the article. They add to a sense of misunderstanding by the contributors, regarding otability. Being the videographer of an artist's world tour or shooting a music video does not by itself create notability. Critical discussion of that body of work in eliable sources would be an indication of notability. Leaving mention of Cohen in other articles is fine
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:R)

Comment: per  and under  as it contains a lot of spiteful gossip. Looks like an attack page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP)

Comment: As others noted, there is a paucity of sources about her that go into detail. This AfD is a clear-cut case of |too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Nothing to support a standalone article. A  case here. All the sources discuss her in relation to other notable people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Fails . Almost every source talks about someone OTHER than her, the fact that the source titles almost all have someone else's name in them is a big red flag. Even when a source talks about her, it's in relation to someone else, she is secondary to the article and usually mentioned only in passing. Notability just isn't inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)