Deletion of List of U.S. states by Gini coefficient of income inequality (2nd nomination)

Comment: 1.  is not policy. 2. Notwithstanding that,  provides criteria for what is not cruft: that "list of X" is valid if X is also valid, i.e. exists as an article. Both U.S. state and Gini coefficient (and income disparity for that matter) exist. 3. List of countries by income equality exists and is likewise valid. So are lists of U.S. states by other criteria e.g. List of U.S. states by population density. 4. While "Gini coefficient of income equality" is redundant and perhaps limiting, bad naming is not grounds for deletion. 5. I am not a eletionism|Cyberman
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:D)

Comment: or merge into Gini coefficient.  This is a table, not an article, and I can't imagine becoming |even a stub anytime soon.  If this were the subject of treatises and other secondary sources, I'd favor inclusion as a separate article.  But as it is, while |interesting, does not make an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Interesting how? It has no  commentary to place that into perspective
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELY)

Comment: WP:INTERESTING|It's interesting is not a valid criteria for keeping. Passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: Theoretically interesting, but otherwise useless list of Gini coefficients of states. Only .1 separates most socialist state from most capitalist (?) state. They aren't the states you'd expect. DC is worst. Alaska and Wyoming are among the "best." But so what? This stand-alone list is of no obvious use to anyone. Nor does it claim to be!It is well-meaning, I suppose, but to what intent?  Wikipedia is #STATS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)