Deletion of Education in Tacloban

Comment: This list seems a bit too long to merge to Tacloban. I don't like plain lists like this (it's more like a ) but it seems pretty common to list all educational institutions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: nbsp; As per , sources are not required, nor is there any policy or guideline that prevents the addition of sources to articles without sources, although doing so during an AfD is risky.&nbsp; This one article represents man-months of volunteer work that are needed for improving the encyclopedia, which would become dozens of stand-alone articles.&nbsp; The path to encouraging such donations of time does not proceed with deleting or reducing what we have.&nbsp; The world at large has an on-going interest and need to reference public sector institutions.&nbsp; As per , "...no amount of improvements to the Wikipedia content will suddenly make the subject notable. Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability."&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:NNC)