Deletion of Elizabeth O'Day

Comment: Having just looked at the article links posted above, the subject passes the GNG; done deal.  Whether she meets the prof test is irrelevant -- she meets the GNG.  Whether her company succeeded or not is irrelevant -- she meets the GNG.  That the cites representing the "significant coverage" in "multiple reliable sources" the GNG requires were published longer ago than the last news cycle is irrelevant -- she meets the GNG (and allow me to quote from  - "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage.").  Whether there are more successful folks from her college graduating class, whether her business skills (or lack thereof) are highlighted, these are all irrelevant etc.  (That the article itself is bloated is a content dispute, and not relevant here at AfD, and nothing stops anyone who thinks it is from trimming it as seems to them good
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: A GS h-index of 14 is too low for a very high-cited field to pass rof: oo soon. The BLP is over long and reads as if written by a PR team to squeeze in any possible material. If kept, it should be reduced by 75% to remove the bloat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)