Deletion of Mario Magnotta

Comment: the parallels with Italian Wikipedia does not affect this discussion, Italian Wikipedia has different users, different guidelines and different notability rules, ie there it does not exist  that instead is fundamental in English Wikipedia, and the subject appears to pass this guideline. Specifically, looking at first reference http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2012/04/26/news/l_aquila_una_via_per_mario_magnotta_mito_blasfemo_dello_scherzo_telefonico-33986666/, in addition to being "significant coverage in a realiable source" (as well as the fouth), it documents that after his death a street was named with his name (see also http://www.ilmessaggero.it/societa/persone/aquila_una_via_per_magnotta_la_vittima_dello_scherzo_telefonico/archivio/192877.shtml), sign of some lasting notability. There are still also (verifiable) events dedicated to his memory such as a http://www.abruzzo24ore.tv/news/Tra-il-serio-e-lo-scherzo-un-giorno-per-ricordare-Mario-Magnotta/19332.htm Magnotta Day. So, keep, per GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  per http://www.repubblica.it/ultimora/24ore/E-MORTO-A-LAQUILA-IL-MITICO-MARIO-MAGNOTTA/news-dettaglio/3485000, http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2012/04/26/news/l_aquila_una_via_per_mario_magnotta_mito_blasfemo_dello_scherzo_telefonico-33986666/. Also, per , sources are not required to be in English
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Bad nomination.  Notability is not limited to one nation.  If that sort of coverage in English speaking sources would make someone notable, then the same sort of coverage in a different language makes them notable as well.  No article on another Wikipedia is not a valid reason to delete an article either.  The Italian Wikipedia only has 943,354 articles while the English Wikipedia has 4,012,201.  No valid deletion nomination given.   And the subject clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)