Deletion of List of chemical compounds with unusual names

Comment: one of the external links provides a verifiable source for at least some of the compounds on the list.  Could be better sourced, but it's not |unverifiable.  Arguments that the list if POV are poorly thought out, or in conflict with wikipedia's policy on sourcing.  POV unusual is fine as long as it's not the wikipedian's point of view, but a verifiable POV (which in this case, it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Maybe I'm missing something here, but this seems to be a perfect example of something that fails both  as well as .  The word 'unusual' in the article's title is necessarily POV, who is to say which chemical names are unusual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)