Deletion of Progeniq

Comment: strongly.  Inappropriate |POV tone: yet another business claiming to be a "solution provider".  Jargony to the point of unintelligibility, very vague, and free from context: they are "developing highly optimized software with multiple-fold speedups".  Nothing here suggests that this is a biotechnology company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: no |reliable sources.  The first is their own site, the second is a list of links, and the third has two trivial mentions, on pages 8 and 9 of an 11-page document.  Appears to be a |NN company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORP)

Comment: The links seem to be to white papers, i.e. self-published, so I don't see multiple sources of independent coverage. Further, I don't see any claims that meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The links are independent sources from Apple and AMD, and are not internally published. Please go through the references and check your claims. The references are also from notable companies in Wikipedia Apple_Inc.|Apple and Amd|AMD, so it should meet the  requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)