Deletion of Musean hypernumber

Comment: The article is poorly-written and the subject is of uncertain notability. But it's certainly not  in the Wikipedia sense: Musès rediscovered or repackaged the Cayley–Dickson construction and split-complex numbers at the very least, and probably most of his 'levels' are isomorphic to some simple or well-known mathematical objects. Further, it could be the case that the concept is not notable within mathematics but notable in, say, philosophy of mind or Western esotericism. In any case I'm unwilling to count as a strike against the article Musès' use of terminology which differs from modern mathematical terminology: pick one or the other, define appropriately, and move on
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Patent nonsense (WP:NONSENSE)