Deletion of Potato Valley Cafe

Comment: This is making me hungry but according to  "routine restaurant reviews" do not establish notability.  The way I see it is that many restaurants that exist get reviewed.  It's part of business.  Even non-notable restaurants get reviewed.  A tough call though--if I did not see that in  I would have said keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Coverages has been found providing it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: reads like a self-promotion piece.  Does not establish any notability - it's a restaurant(s) that serves potato(s).  Lots of restaurants serve potatos.  Runs afoul of  & . Not to be critical, but there is just does not appear to be a significant relevance to encyclopedic content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB||WP:NN)

Comment: meeting GNG does not mean that the article is appropriate for inclusion, nor does it require inclusion.  Fails , , , and finally 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:NOTDIR||WP:WHIM||WP:NOTTOILETPAPER)

Comment: Passes . Examples include: http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/food-dining/hidden-eats-potato-valley-cafe/, http://www2.qsrmagazine.com/articles/ones_to_watch/125/potato_valley-1.phtml, http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/restaurants/potato-valley-cafe,1158145.html, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=WT&p_theme=wt&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=112CABF91F251178&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=LVRB&p_theme=lvrb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=11B6F60E6B8A7C00&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM. See also: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_is_not_paper Wiki is not paper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Non notable restaurant.  It is referenced and arguably could be seen to meet  (depending on interpretation) but it is an article that is way out of the purview of an encyclopaedia - even for WP. Contested PROD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)