Deletion of Rob Brezsny

Comment: Secondary source coverage appears to be featured in the article, although it may not be as independent as I might like, I suspect that stems from very little coverage of astrologers outside their field. It is seems adequate for  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: He seems fairly notable in his fields and there are a wealth of third party sources that cover him in detail over a long period of time. He might not be world-famous to a general audience but he isn't obscure either and seems to meet the standards in  for inclusion. WRT to the nominator's statement, my understanding is that notability is not temporary; the fact that he was notable in 2008 doesn't mean that he is not notable 10 years later
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)