Deletion of Kitty Empire (2nd nomination)

Comment: per pburka and my review of GScholar - #1 is supported by  and wide citations by peers or successors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: per #1. There's surprisingly little written about Ms. Empire herself; perhaps this is by choice: she does write using a pseudonym. However a Google Scholar search reveals how influential she is as her reviews are widely cited in both popular and academic works. Writing in https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143016000623 ''Popular Music'' v.36, Powers and Perchard call her "one of the UK's comparatively few broadsheet pop critics, and one of the most insightful". Schott discusses one of her reviews in https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2018.1559126 ''Celebrity Studies'' v.10 no.1.  Stevenson describes one of her reviews in his chapter in https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315797755-24/david-bowie-questions-fandom-late-style-nick-stevenson ''David Bowie'' (Taylor & Francis, 2015). She's quoted and cited by Neal in https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2015.1121571 ''Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture'' v.22 no.2. She's quoted again in https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-59812-3_3 ''From Feminist Mothers to Feminist Monsters'' (Springer, 2017). And one of her reviews is positively reviewed by Hogarth in https://books.google.com/books?id=Bs-SDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT235 ''Writing Feature Articles'' (Routledge, 2019). These are just a few examples, but I think they're sufficient to show that Empire "is regarded as an important figure" and "is widely cited by peers or successors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)