Deletion of David Lax

Comment: I disagree with the notion that we need to limit our evaluation of notability to material currently included in the article. A Google Scholar search suggests a pass of #C1; he’s the first author of several publications cited >100 times. He’s the co-author of a book, and I haven’t looked for reviews which would pass , but I don’t think it’s relevant given the pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: Google Scholar is showing five publications with over 100 citations each, one with over 2000. I think that's enough for #C1. However it's a bit of a red flag that I could only find one published review of his two books (not enough for notability via 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: appears to be in line with #C1 but more work is required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: fails all criteria listed in . I cannot find any third-party sources regarding the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)