Deletion of Dakota Skye (actress)

Comment: Sources in the article seem sufficient to me to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article may not have many sources right now (4 reliable, 3 of which say mostly the same thing), but just putting "dakota skye" into https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dakota+Skye%22&tbm=nws Google News shows quite a lot of results, though I don't know of their editorial oversight, nor how reliable they are. IMDB is of course , and should not be used as a reference, but beyond that, this article can possibly be salvaged with a bit of reworking and extra citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:USERGENERATED)

Comment: There are these interviews from around 2014/15 (NSFW warning...) https://interviews.adultdvdtalk.com/dakota-skye/, https://www.xcritic.com/columns/column.php?columnID=6011, https://fleshbot.com/6003475/twenty-questions-with-dakota-skye/. Don't know if they count as , but if so, then '''keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Passes . Article has been expanded since nomination. Special:Contributions/172.58.107.125|172.58.107.125
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Your arguments sound like . Obviously many editors and administrators like Jayron32 think the sources in the article are sufficient enough to pass . Special:Contributions/172.58.107.149|172.58.107.149
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , , and .  Aside from obituaries and assaulting her boyfriend, I found no reliable secondary biographical sources to support notability.  A search for sources using a pre-death date brought back only https://www.cltampa.com/news-views/people/article/20757460/the-horizons-of-dakota-skye this primary source interview. There have been a few discussions about whether obituaries alone can support notability, but no consensus.  See Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)/Archive 2018#Obituaries in the Times and NYT and Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)/Archive 2012#Obituaries as proof of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Rather interesting influx of IP editors and a long-dormant accounts showing up. Off-site |meatpuppetry should be taken into consideration by the admins that close this down the road
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT)

Comment: Per SportsOlympic. Meets . Special:Contributions/45.144.113.208|45.144.113.208
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: based at least upon her nominations for the XBIZ Awards (https://www.xbiz.com/news/187821/dakota-skye-receives-two-nominations-for-xbiz-awards) and AVN Awards (https://avn.com/business/press-release/video/dakota-skye-earns-seven-avn-award-noms-including-best-new-starlet-581087.html). I note a few interviews, e.g. https://interviews.adultdvdtalk.com/dakota-skye/ Adult DVD Talk, https://www.xcritic.com/columns/column.php?columnID=6011 XCritic and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XixMPul_2f0, although it's hard for me to assess whether they meet the requirements of . I'm mindful that, given the area of Skye's work, interviews are not likely to be in the more mainstream reporting areas, but, relative to others in her field, she appears to have gained notability as Wikipedia understand the term
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)