Deletion of Hi-Jet Helicopter Services

Comment: The use of sources in foreign languages is certainly not forbidden, as per . That's not of my concern. I'd like to know the reasons why the editor that re-created this article did so and also why the subject is notable. It seems to me that both  and  (where |verifibaility is required for the subject of an article to be notable) fail here: there are 35 hits for "hi-jet" at Flightglobal, yet neither of these seem to be related to the subject in question. The user who re-created this article should have taken these guidelines in mind, both for this particular article and for future articles s(he) intends to start. Furthermore, the s(he) has not the cleanest record regarding  issues, so I suggest to do a careful check of the content of the page to avoid such conflicts again. Finally, far more inline citations are required. For the time being, there are too much doubts, so I support deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NONENG||WP:NCORP||WP:NRVE||WP:VERIFY||WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: Evidence brought forth by Jetstreamer is fairly condemning. Definitely fails . Is full of  violations and close inspection shows that removing all peacock terms from the article would leave a non-notable stub. Not worth keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:PEACOCK)