Deletion of Suzanne Arruda

Comment: meets , in addition to her books being reviewed by ''Romantic Times'', ''Kirkus Reviews|Kirkus'', ''Publishers Weekly|PW'', ''Library Journal'', and ''Historical Novel Review'', some have also been reviewed by ''Booklist'' ie. https://bepl.ent.sirsi.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:1806460/one?qu=the+crocodile%27s+last+embrace ''The crocodile's last embrace'', https://bepl.ent.sirsi.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:1751189/one?qu=the+leopard%27s+prey%3A+a+jade ''The leopard's prey'', https://bepl.ent.sirsi.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:1771047/one?qu=treasure+of+the+golden+cheetah ''Treasure of the golden cheetah'', https://bepl.ent.sirsi.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:1703643/one?qu=the+serpent%27s+daughter+arruda ''The serpent's daughter'', https://bepl.ent.sirsi.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:1640599/one?qu=mark+of+the+lion+arruda ''Mark of the lion'', although most of these are "trade" reviews that some editors (including. it seems, the nominator, for PW anyway) are uncomfortable with (especially kirkus that now do accept payments for reviews, but which ones and since when?), they are  acceptable for notability ... with some of these books having 3 reviews they could  have their own wikiarticle (but i'm not going to push it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Meets point #3 of , per the subject's works having received multiple independent periodical reviews
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)