Deletion of Enchanta

Comment: to Encantadia#Enchanta: Similar thoughts with the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brilyante|previous AfD. Definitely . A segment in the target page will suffice. Instead of deleting it, it's best to revdel the revisions done in 2017 (where a slew of vandalism was done) and protect the page indefinitely
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: or delete - Topic lacks real world information needed to meet 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As this language is not covered in detail in third party sources, which makes it impossible to meet . I see IJzeren's discovery of the mention in the  source and that's not really enough to pass the . Tertiary sources might be able to verify some small amount of information, and provide a precedent for what is considered  weight on a subject. If that's the case, there might be a case for drastically cleaning this up and summarizing it for a merge
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:TERTIARY||WP:GNG||WP:DUE)