Deletion of Zander Vaubel

Comment: Fails , and I have serious doubts that any of this information will be verifiable ten years from now.  Generally, Wikipedia does not permit articles on people who are less notable than the average college professor; Vaubel fails that test
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I agree that the information is verifiable but I don't see that the subject passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Please refrain from |personal attacks like calling people Nazi's.  You are correct; |WikiPedia is not paper but WikiPedia is also | not a memorial.  The policy is clear, and I quote incase you'd rather not look yourself: "Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must have a claim to fame besides being fondly remembered."  I am not doubting people loved this guy.  I am not doubting he will be missed.  I am not doubting that friends of him would appreciate reading an article about him here.  But WikiPedia has clear-cut objective standards by which a potential subject is judged.  They can be found at , , and .  Read these and then IMPROVE THE ARTICLE so that it meets these standards.  Simply complaining that the article should be kept does not good.  If it can be brought up to standard, then do so.  It will be kept.  If the article cannot be brought up to standard, it will be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NN||WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: I don't have a strong opinion either way on this one, but  is in fact a guideline - see the top of the page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)