Deletion of Eversharp

Comment: Based on the sources in the article and Edward's vote above, notability is obvious. It's hard to see how an article on a product from the 1910s can be seen as , especially when that article has a neutral, non-promotional tone. In fact, I'm wondering if this should be |speedily kept because this is a "nomination which is so erroneous that it indicates that the nominator has not even read the article in question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:SK)