Deletion of Allegations of state terrorism by Russia

Comment: and give peoples a chance to work on it. Topic may have merits but currently article is a dump and schoolbook example of  and . Adding "energy" part to it is so hilarious it almost begs to add link to this article to Anti-Russian sentiment|Russophobia page. Russian attempt to use it's economic influence is considered State Terrorism. Gimme a break, what country does not use whatever economic influence it has
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POV)

Comment: per nom.  Violates  just as much as that other crap magnet Allegations of state terrorism by the United States
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per   and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POINT)

Comment: per  - You cant take a bunch of facts and tie them up to make a point.   Mention the sourced incidents in the appropriate articles, but not like this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per  definitely and per nom strongly. I hate when people assume "adding sources" to an article always fixes everything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Opinions do not equal facts. This article violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)