Deletion of Friendlyjordies

Comment: Per . With reliable sources indicated above, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article's quality is poor at present but notability exists. Shanks' content has been covered by multiple |RS on several occasions.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-49820738https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6391343/From-catwalks-Youtube-content-untold-story-Jordan-Shanks.htmlhttps://www.bandt.com.au/popular-aussie-youtuber-caught-in-racism-row/https://www.crikey.com.au/2019/06/28/friendlyjordies-australian-politics/https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/jordies-on-spechttps://www.gizmodo.com.au/2019/09/billionaire-threatens-to-sue-youtuber-for-calling-him-fatty-mcfuckhead-and-photoshopping-him-as-trumps-baby/https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/youtuber-friendlyjordies-lashed-for-racist-depiction-of-nsw-premier-gladys-berejiklian-and-deputy-john-barilaro/news-story/2c3d3a8e4637214cbf9069745626ba4e
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)