Deletion of Universalizing religion

Comment: to Major religious groupsCornelis Tiele.  The relevant content is not enough for a separate article and the original idea of the current one appears to be .  A mention of universalizing may be adequate in the target article with a relevant source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: A https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=dEFqWvqhIsu4zwK9kKuIBw&q=%22Universalizing+religion%22&oq=%22Universalizing+religion%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i67k1j0l9.96.668.0.865.4.3.0.0.0.0.178.408.1j2.3.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.3.405.0..35i39k1.0.jUiDL8JB2IM search reveals a striking absence of online reliable sources that mention this phrase, supporting power~enwiki's assertion that nothing is present in reliable sources beyond a dictionary definition. There are a couple book sources used in the article and apparently some on https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&ei=W0BqWoG1BeSJggfr2J7wBg&q=%22Universalizing+religion%22&oq=%22Universalizing+religion%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...297.1181.0.1374.2.2.0.0.0.0.144.197.1j1.2.0....0...1c..64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.wsVWPnq56rw Google Books, but it's interesting that "AP Human Geography" is one of the most prominent results and is also used in the article (my favorite is http://stepekaphumangeography.weebly.com/uploads/2/8/4/1/28419347/religion_universalizing_vs_ethnic_2017_-_2018.pdf this class presentation). It doesn't seem to be a recent word, so its absence in prominent descriptions of major religions off-wiki is telling, and supports a mention on Major religious groups (plus maybe Religion) but a redirect to Proselytism per Dbachmann. A greater incorporation of it beyond its mention on one or two articles would be undue weight. A bold redirect will apparently not suffice for Realphi, who seems to be on |a quest to introduce this term to the world (as it is currently https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22universalizing+religion%22&title=Special:Search&profile=default&fulltext=1&searchToken=d7f1zc1hizbww1qa7mw29yvq6 barely used on-wiki outside of their efforts) without the ability to Special:Diff/822332022|add it verifiably
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: to what?'' is the real question) According to 2 above, this is just a #DICTIONARY|dictionary definition and the first paragraph could apply to any major or fringe religion, which all claim to be the truth or to know some kind of higher truth... {{ping|Realphi}} The term is vague enough that it could encompass most world religions - more precise articles dividing them into multiple relevant categories already exist, see Religion#Classification. Special:Contributions/198.84.253.202|198.84.253.202
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)