Deletion of Freedom Debt Relief

Comment: The sourcing is horrible and it's clearly an advert article that would likely be close to impossible to write probably in it's current form. So,  applies along with this not meeting the notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per . I believe this company might be notable but for completely different reasons than available in the article as will shortly become apparent. The article itself is entirely promotional and has been whitewashed of all negative details. For example, while some of the Keep !voters above have repeated that the company are "the largest U.S. debt settlement services provider", this claim was not made by Reuters but instead is contained in https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/bureau-settles-lawsuit-against-freedom-debt-relief/ this CFPB announcement which Reuters reported on and which throws a completely different light on the settlements than the whitewashed version in the article. There are almost no negative details in the article and what hints exist in the article are so obfuscated as to hide any fact of wrongdoing on their part. Also, while Rite cite correctly links to a list of scholarly articles, the very first paper is entitled "Federal Oversight of the Debt Relief Industry: A More Effective Means of Deterring Illegal Debt Settlement Schemes" and says
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)