Deletion of List of actors who played President of the United States

Comment: per Dwaipayan.  You certainly wouldn't want a list of "Actors who have played people named Bob" or "Actors who played government employees," but President of the U.S. is obviously more remarkable than that.  Someone has put a tremendous amount of work into organizing this list.  It's well done per , good for information, navigation.  It's also discriminate, verifiable.  Not a lot of movies actually have the president as a character, so it's not impossible to keep on top of.  Frankly, this list would be a sound candidate for a featured list.  And, although it's not a criteria for deletion, I'd propose that in the absence of sound criteria, editors should take into mind whether or not they're destroying the hard, well-intentioned work of other editors.  There's just no good reason to do that here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: when someone calls an article up for deletion as "useful" Otto cites  (not a policy or guideline), but simultaneously we get this comment at the top of this discussion: "actors can play dozens or hundreds of different roles in the course of their careers. Listing actors by the parts they play is rather trivial" So we can't argue usefulness but we can argue what is essentially the opposite, because that's what "trivial" actually means here. Anyone who wants to study how actors have played presidents, real and fictional, would find this list .... '''''nontrivial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)