Deletion of Cherise Haugen

Comment: She won Miss Teen USA, which is notable in and of itself.  says a person is notable if they have received a "well-known and significant award or honor." Her win was widely written about in newspapers at the time. She was the first Miss Teen Illinois to win Miss Teen USA. She was honored by the State of Illinois and her biography was presented to the General Assembly, which is significant in-depth coverage.https://books.google.com/books?id=GgtiZASOf8YC&dq=Cherise+Haugen+miss+teen+usa&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Cherise+Haugen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: From what I see above the question hinges on two points. The first is whether winning Miss Teen USA is a ''"well-known and significant award or honor"'' as envisaged by . Is anyone aware of any guidelines or an established AfD consensus which comment on this? If it is then we have a presumption of notability. If it is not then there are no notability criteria from which to argue for inclusion. The second question is if there is a presumption of notability. Wikipedia requires that notability have verifiable evidence. That means that the presumption of notability can be rebutted if there are insufficient actual sources. Specifically  requires ''"the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity"''.  The delete arguments here take the position that Miss Teen USA is not the type of thing envisioned by ANYBIO while the keep argument is that it is. Unless there is some prior guidance or consensus to draw on this part of the discussion is pretty much a push which brings us to the sourcing.  Again, the delete argument is that the sourcing presented fails  on at least two fronts; it was not significant coverage rather it was local, routine coverage similar to the coverage received in any other 'local teen does good' story like wining a National Merit Scholarship, an award from a social organization like the Rotary, Red Cross etc or a national level teen sporting event like the Junior Olympics. None of which are considered significant coverage for notability purposes. Secondly most of those arguing for deletion say the existing coverage is 'mere short term interrest' ie . I would be interested in hearing arguments on the sufficiency of sourcing and the applicability of BLP1E from those who wish to keep the article since none of the keep arguments have addressed those issues. (Note: I have added the option to redirect to my !vote above since that seems to be how some of the other winners are handled
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NRV||WP:NRV||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The subject won a single beauty pageant 30 years ago, which is, as Black Kite says, effectively . And "national-level" or no, it's not even a particularly big beauty pageant, either, as these things go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: there's no consensus currently that winning Miss Teen USA 1984 satisfies . Significant RS coverage to meet  not found; what's available is in passing and / or routine, as in: ''Local resident does good''. Separately, :Category:Miss Teen USA winners contains names that are notable for other things, such as Shelley Hennig (actress) and Vanessa Lachey (model & TV personality). This is not the case with the present article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Above, there were questions whether The Illinois State legislature's award and presentation count as a source to establish notability.  says: "Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is 'made available to the public in some form'." It establishes: "This includes material such as documents in publicly accessible archives, inscriptions on monuments, gravestones, etc., that are available for anyone to see." A document published by the Illinois State legislature with significant coverage of Haugen falls under that definition.https://books.google.com/books?id=GgtiZASOf8YC&dq=Cherise+Haugen+miss+teen+usa&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Cherise+Haugen
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE)

Comment: I cannot see any WP:BIO policy that makes a winner of "Miss Teen USA" notable (see ).  More broadly, I don't see that winning a national pageant (note: not international, or even national followed by going on to international) and then doing practically nothing else of note makes one notable.  It's effectively 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:BLP1E)