Deletion of Vampire houses in Blade

Comment: WP:Fancruft|fancruft that is virtually sourceless and overflowing with |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: this seems to be bordering on |indiscriminate information. I can see no significant coverage in |reliable sources that indicates independent notability of the houses. Without reliable sources, I don't see how any real-world analysis could be added. If any of the information is |verifiable, then it could be merged to Blade (comics), but that doesn't look likely at the moment, so deletion would probably be best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: WP:DELETE is the only objective standard. All arguments to delete, here, are based on essays or interpretations of policy.  in particular should rarely if ever be seen in AfD; it is a writing style. Editors should comment on the talk page about it if they cannot actually write. There is a certain irony in combining 'fancruft' and 'OR'. Which is it? Facts about the franchise, or made up stuff? But not as much irony as there is in deletion based on lack of sources. RS: "we only publish the opinions of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves". And yet WP currently allows deletion based on the interpretation of WP policy, which is itself other WPn's interpretation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:UNIVERSE)