Deletion of Primecoin (3rd nomination)

Comment: how on Earth has this barely survived two nominations? It blatantly fails  and arguably . This is not a quick renomination by any means, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Fails notability due to too little significant  coverage. The lack of coverage has led to over-reliance on the self-published primary source document of Primecoin's creator. Most RS coverage is minor/incidental to the subject (e.g., dealing with the server shortages or malware), and the two RS sources I consider significant coverage are from ''CoinDesk'' and ''Bitcoin Magazine'', which I consider only weakly reliable sources. Half of the "keep" votes on the prior discussion seemed ill-considered, made right after {{u|84.55.98.173}} added lots of poorly-detailed cites in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Primecoin&oldid=594263610 this version, from new/infrequent AfD reviewers who overlooked that many were not to RS sources. The other half were well-considered, reasonable differences of opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It sounds like you're claiming two reasons for deletion: (1) unambiguous advertising or promotion and (2) non-notable. The first is covered in , "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic". For the second, a page only needs to meet the criteria of one notability guideline, so either  or  (or even ) is adequate. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Primecoin_(2nd_nomination) last AfD for this article was decided only a month ago, so I'd encourage reviewers to look through that for added background
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:WEB)