Deletion of John Freshwater

Comment: FFS people this is a blatant  violation not to mention we are NOT a news site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . #NEWS also applies here - which is why I do not agree with Jeff Billman's proposal to move the page to another title
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT)

Comment: on deletion but '''rename'''; I do not see any evidence that the person is notable (), but given our precedents for court cases the overall conflict ''may'' be notable, given the extensive press coverage. I leave it to the judgment of others as to what name the article should take, since there seem to be multiple court cases involved. A Request for Comment might be in order
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: The person is not notable, but the event and coverage probably is. The current article is mostly a |coatrack anyway. (Incidentally, I was living about 5 minutes from Mount Vernon when all this happened and it was quite a big deal around there; no idea how big a deal it was elsewhere, but there certainly seems to be enough coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COAT)

Comment: to Freshwater v. Mount Vernon Board of Education (title of case before the Ohio Supreme Court) another title that focuses upon the event rather than the person.   is a valid concern, but case meets notability criteria, including coverage by such international sources as The Guardian (see http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/8551596 ), MSNBC (see http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25585916/ ), Canada Free Press ( http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/3817 - though not suitable for NPOV, does demonstrate coverage outside the US), and the American Broadcasting Company ( http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=5214063&page=1 ), among others
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)