Deletion of List of tallest buildings in Montgomery, Alabama

Comment: Absent sources treating these as a group sufficient to meet NLIST, there's no difference between this page and any other individually sourced cross-categorization (how about "list of buildings in Walla Walla built between 1900-1920 and home to a coffee shop after 1995" or "list of buildings in Santa Fe listed chronologically according to movies they've been seen in"). That there are |other similar articles only means that: that there are other similar articles. It doesn't mean this one is notable. The only argument I can see that bypasses notability would be that a list of building heights falls into Wikipedia's role as a gazetteer, making it a standard list for any place  rather than letting the sourcing tell us which places we should have them for, but realistically there's no way there would be consensus for that interpretation. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: While some of the buildings are listed on the NRHP, they are listed for other reasons then their height. This list is not really discussed as a group except in sources that are designed to list random statistics. Yes it's true that the tallest building is noted because it's tall, but the fifth tallest doesn't matter to anybody.  is not a convincing argument here. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: Fails . I don't think there is a standard for what would be considered "tall" but don't see how a building under 20 stories would be considered notably tall.  &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per nom -- I'm not sure this was explicitly stated anywhere above, but this starts to get into  #6 (Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations).  We already have List of tallest buildings in Alabama, but even that's pushing it (the top entry there doesn't even crack the top 100 nationwide).  Further narrowing by city in a state of mostly unremarkably tall buildings doesn't make sense. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: One other thing I neglected to mention is that this list also runs afoul of .  Unless there's a comprehensive list that this is being pulled from, there's no way to verify that there are no buildings shorter than entry #11 but taller than entry #12, for example.  I guess we could call this "List of buildings in Montgomery by height", but again, that just tends to highlight the cross-categorization issue I mentioned earlier. &ndash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: No coverage as a topic, therefore not notable. The buildings and their height are unremarkable, see . Random cross-categorization violating 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: This is a well sourced article which passes and . When we have RS we keep the article/list. Montgomery is the capital of Alabama and the 2nd largest city in Alabama. Notable buildings. To delete the list would be a disservice to our readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:LISTN)