Deletion of Teleportation in fiction

Comment: because |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Even lists must comply to the  |notability guideline which states that "A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed  as a group or set by independent reliable sources", and I see no reliable source whatsoever that has discussed the topic of teleportation in fiction. And to answer to Marc Kupper, no, the items in the list, that is, "teleportation in Aladdin/The Fly/Harry Potter/etc" are not notable topics, even if they are tied to one generally notable topic. I remind you that notability is not inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:LISTN)

Comment: and '''Keep''' - This article is the result of a content dispute between editors with no consensus reached on if the list should be retained in the Teleportation article. I don't have time tonight to sort out the edit histories and players but see List of fiction containing teleportation, Teleportation in fiction, and Teleportation. These have forked, merged, moved, etc. over time. I'm inclined to go with a '''Keep''' as this article clearly qualifies as a  as the subject of teleportation itself is notable and nearly all of the items in the list are notable subjects. While the list is sorely in need of citations that itself is not grounds for deletion. One concern is that I read over the list and none of the items seemed worthwhile for inclusion in the new ''Teleportation'' article. In other words, none of the items have been judged as noteworthy examples of teleportation by the author, television, or publishing communities
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)