Deletion of J.P. Calderon

Comment: How so? Here is the entertainment related criteria at , and it's already been established that being on Survivor alone isn't enough for a page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I don't want to see a Wikipedia where every contestant on every reality show has the right to a Wikipedia article.  This person has done nothing notable but be in two reality shows, gaining on the low end of normal media attention for this.  A career of reality shows may be notable - but two shows does not yet qualify as a career.  I believe this person fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: possibly '''Merge''' Agree the Calgary Sun and  TV Guide articles satisfy  and  there is no   problem, so he meets policy criteria. Would welcome a merge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP)

Comment: Full disclosure, I wrote the article. The article is about a nationally-ranked college athlete who went on to become an acknowledged (albeit admittedly not particularly successful) professional, who has been/is part of the cast of two different reality television series. The nominator acknowledges on the talk page that there are already two sources noted in the article (The Calgary Sun article and the TV Guide article), along with several other references which he dismisses for various questionable reasons, but then goes on to claim that the two |reliable sources are somehow "not notable" enough to sustain the article. Nominator hangs the AfD on his contention that someone would have to finish 4th on Survivor to be notable (a contention which as far as I can tell is unsupported in policy or guidelines) and on his dismissal of two reliable sources as "non-notable" which makes no sense. Scorpion redirected the article without comment and, when I restored it, redirected it again with the rationale that there are other Survivor contestants who are more notable but who don't have articles. This is an invalid rationale. A subject's notability is independent of another subject's notability. If the hundred other Survivor conestants are as or more notable than Calderon, then Scorpion or whoever else is free to write articles about them. Their absence is not an excuse to delete this article.  There has been nothing offered in terms of either Wiki-policy or Wiki-guidelines under which this article is not acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: seems to meet notability requirements and . Notability does not expire. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)