Deletion of WBSC (AM)

Comment: See below) Delete - The article does not meet a single notability guideline, and that other related articles are "generally notable" isn't a reason to keep this one as Wikipedia consensus has long established that |notability is not inherent; "it is not notable simply because other individual organizations of its type are commonly notable."  That such articles are "generally notable" means nothing; notability must be established, and "generally" means there will be articles which are not notable.  Unless sources can be found, this appears to be one of those articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGSIG)

Comment: as broadcast radio stations have been found generally notable (like geographic locations and significant highways) and |notability is not temporary. That a station has stopped broadcasting does not retroactively remove its service to the community
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: To clarify why I gave a delete rationale: not a single one of the "speedy keep" comments are based on any Wikipedia policy or guideline, including the relevant notability guidelines.  The keep rationales given say that this article should be kept because radio station articles are "generally kept".  This is true, however that has no bearing on why ''this'' article specifically should be kept.  That such articles are "generally kept" of course means that there are articles that are not kept, and that these articles must show notability.  This is reflected by .  Arguments have been put forth on my talk page that radio station articles are "inherently notable", but this is directly contradicted by Wikipedia consensus;  specifically points out that '''no''' organization is inherently notable, no matter what kind of organization it is.  This includes radio stations.  So the argument that such articles are "generally kept" does not warrant keeping this article, as that is nothing more than commentary about the overall concept of radio station articles, not a justification for ''this'' particular article.  An article needs to show notability, not ride the coattails of articles with actual notability.  When the "radio stations are inherently notable" fallacy is discarded and this article is looked at on its own merits as it should be, it becomes quickly apparent that it fails to meet any relevant notability guideline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST||WP:ORGSIG)

Comment: nice work (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)