Deletion of Palestinian political violence/ 2nd nomination

Comment: The introduction to the article clearly states that the perpetrators of the violence maintain that the violence is justified. The only reason this article is being attacked as POV is the fact that such acts of "political violence" will invariably reflect badly on their perpetrators... hmmm, perhaps we should delete any article that reflects badly on anyone - for instance, Watergate scandal reflects badly on Richard Nixon, etc. etc. Also, it's pretty clear that there is some degree of |conflict of interest in this nomination, but that's beside the point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: If it's POV, make it NPOV. If there's a better title, move it. If it needs further sourcing to make claims for "legitimate" violence, source it. It's clearly an important topic that should be covered.  is not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: badly written, badly sourced, entirely fixable; very unconvincing nomination with  potential
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)