Deletion of Nonnie berard

Comment: Won a non-notable award (see below), no |reliable sources used in the article, Google News returns nothing. Perhaps ''after'' the aforementioned tour? --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Certainly a lot of  balling and what-ifs going on there, but absolutely nothing that suggests notability, even if the existing content was well referenced. It completely fails all points of , and the acting stuff is hardly worth a mention 'til it actually happens. &nbsp;-- Special:Contributions/WikHead|WikHead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Much as I would like to see a Crawfish Queen in Wikipedia, Ms. Berard doesn't meet the notability standards of  at this point in her career
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: in addition to the arguments above, allow me to add that the article's Talk:Nonnie Berard|discussion page notes that articles on Ms. Berard have already been speedy-deleted twice in the very recent past. New articles have popped up with slightly different capitalization in the titles - a common trick by those who can't take a hint. Also, the admission from Ms. Berard that her agency created the WP article(s) should probably be the over-riding factoid in this discussion. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMYSPACE)