Deletion of Jetha Lila

Comment: The inclusion of such articles are vital to counter Wikipedia:Systemic bias|systemic bias. The original author has provided a reference. It would seem to me that |assuming good faith would require that those bringing up |verifiability should provide an account of their failed attempts to verify the citation. For a book, the first step would be to see if the cited work actually exists. This can be done by checking the online catalog at a National_library#Legal_Deposit_and_Copyright|depository library such as the Library of Congress or the British Library. Another step would be to check to see if the work is in WorldCat. (Anyone in the United States who is affiliated with any College or University, or has a library card at a public library has either direct or indirect (via the librarian) access to WorldCat.) I have done this, and the work cited does exist. If I truly doubted the work actually covers the material, I could order it via inter-library loan, although that might take a few weeks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:V)

Comment: WP:N|notability and |verifiability are questionable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per nominator (above) and because we should take |systemic bias serious. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)