Deletion of Andy Loo

Comment: The only claim to fame here is the Olympiad performances, of which his best is the 2011 Physics gold medal. But there were 50 gold medalists that year, so I don't think that's enough by itself to stand out. In previous AfDs, even participants with significantly better Olympiad records had doubt expressed that that was enough, and instead had to rely on other types of notability such as |in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources — see e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid W. Barton, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teodor von Burg, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Sauermann. But in this case, all we have are contest scores, deadlinks, and press releases (or sometimes combinations of the above). The research contributions are certainly not enough for , despite the name-dropping, especially as they appear in a dubious journal (its publisher, Hikari, is on Beall's list of Predatory open access publishing|predatory open access publishers https://scholarlyoa.com/2014/01/02/list-of-predatory-publishers-2014
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: the dead links should be tagged and then they will be fixed by internetarchivebot, passes  with those links restored, olympiad gold medal is a notable prize and the conflict of interest and sockpuppetry is an allegation that has not been proven
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)