Deletion of Peter Stilsbury

Comment: It should be noted that thinking his character was stupid is not a valid reason to delete the article. The "laughing stock" and "embarassment" comments do not comply with any Wikipedia guidelines regarding deletion discussions.  is cited frequently in wrestling deletion discussions. In this case, it supports his inclusion, which trumps people who just didn't enjoy his character
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: He simply wasn't notable. Good question about whether or not  or  should be the standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Per  notability guideline: "People who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport." The WWF is the top North American promotion, so his role there is sufficient to establish notability. A quick search shows several results in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)