Deletion of Plan 9 Startup Incubator

Comment: Satisfies  per the coverage available, as also noted by Kashmiri
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've looked at all of the references and without exception, they fail .  None are independent (and intellectually independent) third party articles. They are all either advertorials (with the usual "quotes" from Plan9 executives) or advertisements. For example, the Tribune articles may appear to meet the criteria - until you see all the quotes from Plan9 executives - therefore not secondary sources and not intellectually independent. Or look at the entrepeneurs.pk article - leaving aside the fact that it is a blog and therefore doesn't qualify as a reliable source, the article itself starts off well until you get a few paragraphs in and you realise this is naked PR and nothing more, including the obligatory photos. Not one reference is from a reliable third party source. I'm surprised we have two Keep !votes already - maybe I got it wrong .. link me an article you believe meets  and makes for a good reference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: As much as I fight promos, there seems to be sufficient coverage to ascertain significance, if not outright notability '''of Plan 9'''. Primarily, this is not a company, so  does not apply. It is a government programme which has been widely covered in Pakistanihttps://tribune.com.pk/story/613669/plan9-turning-small-dreams-into-big-realities/ and international https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/meet-plan9-pakistan-first-technology-051047881.html media, and it was substantially more than a cursory mention as evidenced by the included reference list. In my view, the subject well satisfies  and the article will likely be looked up by Pakistani readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:N)