Deletion of Battle of the Hornburg

Comment: to The Two Towers#Book III: The Treason of Isengar because there is nothing to merge. Per #PLOT, "Wikipedia treats creative works ... in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works." Here, we just have (not even concise) plot and trivial book-film comparisons (, ). Per above, CGI of Battle of Helm's Deep could make a legitimate  one day, but the current article offers no content for such. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:UNDUE||WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: WP:FANCRUFT is not a , it merely describes a sort of article that is likely to be deleted if it cannot be improved. Similarly  is not a  if the article can be improved so as not to be an all-plot summary.  is an essay - it actual failed to become a guideline because of the flaws in it. So the question is: can this article be improved based on the sourcing available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELREASON||WP:ALLPLOT||WP:DELREASON||WP:NFICTION)