Deletion of Supersonic (company)

Comment: Fails  and GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The article text is oriented towards the company's terms of trade and disposal; while appreciating there may be a public service element in this, it sounds just a  retailer. I am seeing nothing to establish encyclopaedic notability, whether by  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (:WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)

Comment: I won't argue too hard on this one, the depth of content that I was able to discover online as well as being  is probably just about what was covered here in this article. However, I would disagree and probably suggest that it's -worthy. One side note that I noticed is that the manufacturer has a pretty good niche for TV's on Amazon and Walmart under 20 inches (from personal observation). I think bringing to light the environmental concerns are important on this, seeing as folks probably aren't considering that when they see a cheapo $150 or less TV and probably do some basic research on the manufacturer before buying. In which case, it's definitely not a company which cares about environmental record, and I'd like to shine some light on it, but definitely is not all that transparent with their practices (no good sources to back up the article). And as an aside, I think it's a little amazing how a company can create a whole supply chain for TVs on Amazon and have virtually no history on itself besides marketing .—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:STUB||WP:PROMO)

Comment: fails  for lack of in-depth coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)