Deletion of Gil Student (2nd nomination)

Comment: No attribution of notability to independent or credible sources. Blogs responding to his ideas fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: A lot has happened in the last two years, so I would take this AfD on its own merits. It seems to me that his opinions have generated enough attention that they might have been picked up in , so I wouldn't speedy-delete or  this one. I think this will come down to a straightforward decision of whether there are enough sources and whether they are reliable enough. He's mentioned in plenty of blogs, but blogs generally aren't regarded as reliable sources. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:reliable sources)