Deletion of Andrew Newman (Cyber security entrepreneur)

Comment: Using patents as refs are very very poor, and I think illegal on here. Highly promotional. Fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The given articles don't look like they count towards demonstrating that the subject passes . I also found https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/2025776-q-a-with-one-of-the-original-minds-behind-windows-defender this interview, but it's from the community feed of Spiceworks which doesn't really count as a |reliable source. There are some other small articles about some of the projects and startups that he has worked on in the past, but none are significant coverage about him from reliable sources.The claim for point 2 of  mentioned above is also unconvincing, as the footnote for that point reads {{tq|Generally, a person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO)