Deletion of William Howard Hughes

Comment: to Disappearance of William Howard Hughes. Article surely fails  under the current name, since subject has no inherent notability outside of his own disappearance; however, the event itself has received 2 significant bursts of coverage (his disappearance and reappearance) which for me seems to clear . In addition, subject's status as an Air Force analyst is only important insofar as how that fact weighed upon those concerned that his abduction or defection had something to do with his security clearance. I agree with those who think that this angle has not been fully explored by the media as yet, and is why I think the article is keep-worthy under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:NCRIME)

Comment: Not notable per ; lacks "sustained coverage... which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage." Most military desertions are not "historic" by any stretch, there are thousands every year
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: This is a no-brainer on BLP grounds as  clearly isn't met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIM)