Deletion of Normal Bob Smith (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article has been deleted twice before, and the minor improvements since are still not enough to establish notability, delete and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: The old AfD is over a year old, but that doesn't mean one can just up and recreate the article.  Take it to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: Normal Bob Smith has made the news on a few occasions now. He made it when he was dealing with Urban Outfitters and his magnet set, he made it when his website was shut down by religious organizations, he made it when he did some work for Heavy.com and the Mel Gibson Dress-Up - how many times must someone be news before they become noteworthy? He's a major player in the atheist community and has been a topic speaker at atheist conventions. He's been part of a documentary. Controversy and infamy should be sufficient for a Wikipedia article. More specifically, the article doesn't violate any of the Wikipedia rules featured at  (Specifically point 5 of "Indiscriminate collection of information"), since the article addresses the cultural impact of Bob's website projects, not the websites themselves. I wholeheartedly think that this article has the notability and verifiability that Wikipedia demands of its articles. As for the implied , the SPA also advises "to assume good faith" - this is the case where I think good faith is in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SPA)

Comment: fails  IMO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: to the Normal Bob Smith fans posting to this page:  You are encouraged to improve the article by adding additional |references that will demonstrate his |notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:BIO)