Deletion of List of locations in the StarCraft series

Comment: I see there has been a good attempt at using citations here, but the sources don't go beyond the novelizations and game manuals. Without significant third-party sources, this subject falls outside of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: per Marasmusine. Pretty straightforward failure of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: List of this sort are accepted practise as appendices for coverage of notable topics which are too large to easily cover in one article per .  I have added a citation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE)

Comment: DGG has summerized this quite well. The nominator's |concerns are best met through , not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: looks like a quality article. Think I read once Starcraft is the most popular computer game ever? The only point it seems to me to be close to failing on  is point 5, but the individual settings just about seem brief enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: as searching for the individual items on the list of Starcraft locations gets numerous hits on Google News and Google Books from which we could easily continue to build this article: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Starcraft+Aiur&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+Aiur, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+%22Antiga+Prime%22&btnG=Search+Books, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Starcraft+%22Bhekar+Ro%22&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft%20%22Bhekar%20Ro%22&ned=us&hl=en&sa=N&tab=np, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Starcraft+Braxis&cf=all, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+Braxis&btnG=Search+Books, http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft%20Brontes&ned=us&hl=en&sa=N&tab=np, etc. (at least one reliable news or book source exists for every item of the A and B locations; even “Starcraft“ and “locations“ gets book hits: http://books.google.com/books?q=Starcraft+locations see here).   As the results demonstrate, these locations have multiple appearances and mentions in numerous reliable sources, which in itself is a sign of notability and absolutely a sign of verifiability.  A thorough going through of these sources should be exhausted per  and  in this case as no one can legitimately suggest that the subject is neither notable nor verifiable.  Anyway, as a result of these sources already present in the article, and those that can still be added, the article clearly meets , , and .  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:VGSCOPE||WP:GNG||WP:V)