Deletion of Ella Rose Riehle

Comment: Notable because of merely beeing born?!  is also very clear here regarding the news beside that the media response is actually http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Ella+Rose+Riehle rather limited. I am also sure that there are a lot of other different dates and times with a certain mathemetical, sequential, astronomical or even religious meaning. So there is no point to have an article for every baby born on such a "special" time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and the fact that her "interest" isn't even interesting outside the US and places which do month-day-year
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . The whole Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|privacy issue concerns me here. This child's parents may have chosen to expose her to the media, but that doesn't mean she's going to be excited about having an article on one of the world's most popular websites when she's old enough to hear about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as there's no indication of |notability and OTNEWS|Wikipedia is not a place for news reports
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: no notability demonstrated in a |reliable secondary source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: not |notable in any sense of the word
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:BABY does not exist, and the baby is very cute. Also, LiteralKa, please be aware of ; advertising this article in a public IRC room is in violating this policy. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS)