Deletion of Ruhan Rajput

Comment: per nom, there is no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject and fails  also an article about the same subject was created in April under Draft:Ruhaan Rajput using the AfC process by a different user but the submission was declined twice due to the notability issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Does not meet  Warm Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not notable. Doesn't meet , , or . No significant coverage from reliable sources. The new citations are no better. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACTOR||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Does not meet  or  how on earth is this https://healthcare.siliconindiamagazine.com/vendor/gloss-skin-hair-clinic-a-complete-hair-solution-for-a-confident-outlook-cid-4104.html, which is just a big ad for a skin and hair clinic in which the only allusion to the subject is a picture with "director" and his name beneath it and absolutely no other mention or explanation of his connection to the company in the entire page a reference for anything? the Business Standard article has "This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed" at the bottom. Nice to know the place that publishes it disclaims all responsibility for it; that sounds like a reliable source!. Then there's an article about the petrochemical industry that glancingly mentions the owner of one company which just happens to be the subject. the only article that mentions him has no biographical information at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Passes . Sources mentioned in RS are reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)