Deletion of The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc. (second nomination)

Comment: Subject seems to meet notability guidelines as per . Whether other similar groups do or do not meet such guidelines is irrelevant to the discussion of this particular subject. However, if others did decide to merge the content into another article, I personally cannot see any objection to their doing so. That, however, is an entirely separate matter from whether this particular group is notable in and of itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: per Kephera975, and by the same standards by which any religious congregation congregation or other organization would be judged. The refs appear to lack the degree of independence that would be required to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: so your argument boils down to |IDONTLIKEIT, then
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: per  and ...there are already some references, including it seems, three non-self-published books with a couple that describe Israel Regardie's involvement with the origins of the group. This seems to be a small group but notable enough to have received some  coverage, so also, keep per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:V||WP:N||WP:PAPER)