Deletion of Rise to Ruins

Comment: for not meeting  with in-depth coverage from reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: with no prejudice to recreating in 6 months or so/moving to Draft space. I found surprisingly little coverage of this game except for some kickstarter announcements such as http://www.hardcoregamer.com/2014/10/11/endless-survival-is-impossible-in-retro-pixel-castles/111333/, https://www.pcgamesn.com/retro-pixel-castles/retro-pixel-castles-video-reveals-bloody-rain-and-sexy-sexy-villagers, and https://www.destructoid.com/retro-pixel-castles-is-all-the-work-of-just-one-person-282662.phtml. I believe that it is very likely that when it is formally released, enough reviews will come out to provide significant coverage needed for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or draftify. Only major coverage comes from ''Rock, Paper, Shotgun'' (search for ''Retro-Pixel Castles''), and it's just announcements. Wait until the article starts to have substantive reviews from multiple, reliable sources. If the author wants to work in draftspace, fine, otherwise deletion is the best route. (Article topic lacks |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources. (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42)