Deletion of Generation of Youth for Christ

Comment: in expansion of my previous comment I would note that most of the 'History' section (and thus much of the article) is sourced to an ''Adventist Review'' http://www.adventistreview.org/article.php?id=3030 interview with the general vice president of GYC. This goes well beyond not being 'independent-as-defined-by' to not ''even remotely close to'' "third-party" by ''any reasonable definition''. I would rather describe it as 'utterly and incestuously insider
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:Notability defines "Independent of the subject" as "excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject or its creator." It is clear that Generation of Youth for Christ is affiliated with the SDA, therefore SDA sources are not "independent of the subject", and so ''cannot'' add to notability. That does not necessarily mean that they are not ''reliable'', just that they have a predisposition to give the subject greater, and more sympathetic, coverage -- so should not count towards notability, and should not be the ''sole'' source of significant coverage beyond that which is ''pure'' self-description coverage from the subject itself (for  reasons
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)