Deletion of Jigme (Kagyu lama)

Comment: They are a bit more tasty, from the ''French Connection''. Can somebody update the article with these reviews and we may be able call it per . There should be a lot more available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per . Here are my : https://www.sudouest.fr/2010/07/28/c-est-un-enfant-du-tibet-148372-1980.php, {{doi|10.1111/rec3.12183}}, and https://www.lepelerin.com/dans-lhebdo/reportage/le-perigord-de-la-prehistoire-aux-loups-garous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:THREE)

Comment: Note to closing Admin''' Article has been updated with new references and meets . It can now be closed for keep. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: Seems like a  has been attempted, and definitely looks good IMO. Also, acknowledging the above links from {{u|AleatoryPonderings}}. I have a somewhat related question -- I see that Lama Jigme Rinpoche redirects to this page. Shouldn't it be the other way around? My vote as a part of this AfD process is to swap the content. The content on this page needs to be housed at Lama Jigme Rinpoche and this article i.e. Jigme (Kagyu lama) can redirect there as needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: The reason it has been open for two weeks is because an admin has looked at the article and found it wanting. Most of the references are self-published. The ones that have been added are profile pages, they aren't under editorial control or peer reviewed and are probably invalid per . There is no real secondary sources, that are independent, in-depth and reliable. The only reason I didn't comment up until today as I saw an article in The Times about Akong Rinpoche and thought their might be some link to it here, but not found anything.  There is a good para in one book, but its not-independent. It don't believe at this time, that Jigme (Kagyu lama)|Jigme Rinpoche is notable. It doesn't satisfy 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BLPSOURCES)

Comment: I think the new sources make this article squeak past  line. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)