Deletion of J.D. Gordon Creative Labs

Comment: as INTC says the sourcing is "pathetic", the main "external source", the Sioux City paper, briefly notes in about 4 short articles that the company promoted a couple of people, moved into a new office, produced a poster for a non-profit, and (the most interesting one) takes photographs of food, but not as well as the folks in Minneapolis do. In a new low for sourcing, the Podunk College alumni news had a line or two about an employee.  In short - no RS, no WP:V.  The article is also "self serving " quoting INTC again, or IMHO the article is an advertisement for the firm.  It doesn't actually say much beyond something like "The company is open for business" and when that's all there is, it's an ad.  It violates the policy .  Since this is a policy, the authors could be blocked, and we should consider that - if we thought that they'd come back and do it again perhaps in some other articles.  My feeling is that they are only interested in advertising this company, so that there is no need to block them at present
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING)