Deletion of Wavii

Comment: Being small, a start up, having one application, being written like other articles (fixable), or failing are not criteria for deletion (and Wavii was acquired, it didn't fail). The news that Wavii was acquired by Google for $300M was not routine, it was news, and it was covered across a broad spectrum of media. Besides tech blogs like TechCrunch, and the WSJ, the story was covered by PC Magazine, The Telegraph, the Oakland Tribune, and the AP. There are sufficient articles where Wavii is the sole subject to meet . Merging Wavii into Google wouldn't be a bad thing, except that the article Google is already a pretty large, and the ''other products'' section is already quite full of more well known Google products like Google Translate. A worthwhile project would be to create a Wikipedia:Summary style|main article for :Category:Discontinued Google acquisitions so that these various companies/products/technologies could all be described in a coherent narrative, and then some of them, perhaps including Wavii, could be redirected into that new article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY)

Comment: Wavii had substantive coverage before being bought http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/29/with-an-improved-design-navigation-social-features-waviis-rebuilt-iphone-app-is-like-a-facebook-news-feed-for-actual-news/http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2402878,00.asphttp://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/wavii-hands-on/http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/13/wavii-a-facebook-for-topics/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/wavii/, well in excess of your average start-up and independently of the acquisition event. Merging everything from :Category:Discontinued Google acquisitions in a single page sounds remotely plausible assuming the 22 articles only have 1-2 paragraphs each (I didn't check if that holds), but the proposal is outside the scope of this AfD. By the way, a start-up being bought counts as "grade B" success, not failure. That Google bought them to kill them is another matter, but irrelevant for this discussion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)