Deletion of List of bus routes in Portsmouth area

Comment: It is most unlikely that significant coverage in reliable secondary sources will ever be found for this material. The article fails |General Notability Guideline, |Notability of Standalone Lists guideline, |Wikipedia is not a Directory, |Wikipedia Stand Alone List Guideline |Wikipedia is not a Travel Guide and |Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate information. If this sort of material is kept it is always liable to become outdated and a source of misinformation if editors concerned lose interest. Even if we have legal indemnity against any unfortunate consequences of providing wrong data we have a moral responsibility to avoid doing so, not to mention the potential damage to WP's reputation. It is not just a case of not liking it as there are sound reasons for not keeping it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTESAL||WP:NOTDIR||WP:SAL||WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:IINFO)

Comment: The Portsmouth article already contains a Transport section. If and when enough referenced encyclopaedic content from secondary sources exists maybe that can be split out into a separate transport article. If that grows sufficiently maybe we'll one day have a Buses in Portsmouth article. In the meantime this offers no value. The Portsmouth article already details operators in the city, the operator pages already offer greater detail (although I would question the detail there), all this does is list the routes but provides no added value. The edit war on 'colours', despite them being a transitory marketing method than anything of note, sums up the article. Additionally, I see little other than |Original research for justification of what is included
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)