Deletion of Ancestry of Juan Ponce de León

Comment: per , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:STUPID||WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: I do not think his ancestry and relationships are likely to be notable.  Juan Ponce de León certainly is.  The implication of other comments seems to be that the article's accuracy is disputed; if so, it should not be in WP: that is why we do not allow .  Nobody "owns" a WP article.  I have run into this problem myself when WP was much younger and someone had written an article with claims that frankly were fantastic.  This conflect was resolved by my publishing my view in a reputable journal and then citing that in the amended WP article.  I had to defend my view quite hard against the exponents of the fantasy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Wikipedia articles should be mostly referenced to |secondary sources, particularly those published by legitimate publishers, not old unpublished historical documents. While Juan Ponce de León is obviously a very important historical figure, his ancestry is discussed in the main article, which makes clear the dominant opinion that little is known about his ancestry or birth.  This article is undue detail and appears to present a fringe theory, speculation, and/or original research. We should stick to reporting what reliable secondary or tertiary sources say, and this can be done in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)