Deletion of List of KTVX translators

Comment: As I explained in Talk:KTVX#Merge_notice|the merge discussion, CVS Corporation|CVS doesn't list all the cities it does business in because it is trivia, which Wikipedia doesn't allow. This list is also very likely to be |original research, and if it's not, then there is a published source that we can link to, instead of hosting the info ourselves. It'd be more authoritative, too. Even KTVX's own website doesn't have this list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I've listed all these pages and placed a link to this page per  (i.e. no formal tags), so we'll be held up by dhett's absence only
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: I'm back; was away longer than I'd expected to be. Naturally, I strongly disagree with comments that TV translator information is not encyclopedic. This is #Paper|not a paper encyclopedia so there is no reason why the articles shouldn't include translators, as they are relevant. I also contend that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'd be happy to assist with the clean-up. I believe this list is useful; someone who was looking for this information should be able to find it, without having to query endlessly at a government database. People often cite  for these types of lists, but my own encyclopedia at home (World Book) contains many lists, albeit not specifically for lists of translators. I'm not sure why there's a need to link to each query, and I think the tables can be reduced (or at least prettified by removing the ALLCAPS). Many Wikipedia TV station articles have information on translators, as this was a compromise between those who wanted no mention of translators and those who wanted full articles on each translator. In the case of Utah station translators, this information becomes huge because http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tvmarkets.gif Utah has only one market and is a rather large state. This article should ideally mention these facts in the article itself, with proper reference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)