Deletion of Kathleen Bounds

Comment: subject appears to have received multiple mentions from non-primary reliable sources, however if taken in total, those mentions do not appear to pass |significant coverage requirements per . There is the article from the ''Toledo Blade'', but a http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=nA5PAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aQIEAAAAIBAJ&dq=kathleen-bounds&pg=5155%2C1393359 two paragraph blurb is not something I would consider significant coverage. Therefore, given that the subject does not pass ,  doesn't even come into play
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: From a purely mechanical reading of , http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xGFJAAAAIBAJ&sjid=VwoNAAAAIBAJ&pg=5686,5319202&dq=kathleen+bounds&hl=en and http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=i21JAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6AoNAAAAIBAJ&pg=1127,5625885&dq=kathleen+bounds&hl=en, and arguably http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=nA5PAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aQIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5155,1393359&dq=kathleen+bounds&hl=en  are full newspaper articles about the individual that reach WP:GNG.  I don't see this subject meeting the more specific notability guidelines, though, I don't see the awards as reaching ANYBIO 1, or POLITICIAN 1 or 2.  The wording of POLITICIAN 3 suggests that perhaps BASIC might trump, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)