Deletion of Tania Head

Comment: She might have been notable as one of only 19 putative survivors from at or above the point of impact and her prominent involvement with survivors' groups.  The prominence of her exposure as a fraud seals it.  We will have to make sure the article doesn't become a , but the subject itself (her act of fraud) is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: The "around the word" coverage is just re-reporting what the NY Times story details, and so does not count as multiple coverage. Before the expose, she received passing reference, if that, and was not notable. Now she is notable for the expose. See also 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: First of all, having 1 article about her in the NY Times is not "significant" coverage.  Secondly, the Times article was not ABOUT her, but merely mentioned her in passing as a quote.  this is #NEWS|just a news story and I see no reason for an encyclopedia entry on her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)