Deletion of List of tribology organizations

Comment: I think that this could be a useful navigational aid, but is currently a .  My reading of LINKFARM indicates that the internal links, as a navigational aid, are quite reasonable.  So keeping only blue-linked groups is, as I read it, perfectly fine.  That said, I'd prefer, via IAR if needed, to keep the academic journals too.  Finally, that nano-tech one needs the same thing done.  Even worse than this one does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:LINKFARM)

Comment: as this list topic fails #DIR as it does not have a verifiable definition in accordance #List content without which it is just istcruft|listcruft without any externally validated rationale for inclusion in Wikipedia. A list needs some form of external validation in accordance with  to demonstrate that it is not entirely novel or the product of |synthesis, and looking at the content of this list, its lack of souring that suggest it is ''entirely'' made up of unrelated topics stitched together to create an entirely novel list topic that has never been published before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LISTS||WP:L||WP:BURDEN||WP:SYNTH)