Deletion of Assembled Brands

Comment: Fails  the article talks about the company's goals and strategy as do the sources. The articles all seem to concentrate on the fact that the founder comes from a well known family and not on the business itself. These articles are useful for notability for the fpunder but not the company. That said the founder's page looks like it needs some cleaning up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: as above as it passes  with rs independent coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Agree with User:Northamerica1000, and  applies in this case. Also agree '''merging''' to Adam Pritzker as per User:DGG's suggestion as the last option
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per . The "new and improved " is not entirely improved; it tends to assumptively eliminate all business media coverage as routine from the start, regardless of the actual content in said media, and some reporters/articles/sources are more independent than others. Then, deletionists may sometimes just say "delete per ,  ...(et al.) anyway, and sometimes don't even bother actually reading the sources, only base notability upon sources within an article (see ), or even worse, don't bother to engage in  searches (not saying that anyone within this discussion has done so). Not a bright precedent for the encyclopedia; it dumbs it down. Also, no prejudice against '''merging''' to Adam Pritzker as per DGG's stance above, which is correspondent with -M
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:SPIP||WP:NCORP||WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)

Comment: Just commercial blurb. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: I think The Gnome puts his finger on the problems nicely. The references fail to meet the criteria for notability as per NCORP (none appear to be "intellectually independent") and it is clear that some heavy promotion and wooing of the press has gone into pumping the profile of this company. The article creator, BC1278, has disclosed they were paid in the past to create this article and are no longer getting paid. I also have a very large concern that the article creator also runs a marketing and promotional company for brands with expertise in using technology and social media to achieve this aim. I would like the article creator to provide a list of articles that they have been paid to create as well as adhere to  as follows: ''Anyone editing for pay must disclose who is paying them, who the client is, and any other relevant affiliation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)