Deletion of David L. Ganz

Comment: There is a lot of routine coverage of his political office but nothing that would pass the |notability criteria for politicians and judges. He is quoted a lot on numismatics but, so far, I have not seen any articles ''about'' him. He is high profile enough that there should be some if there is anything of note to write. I am open to changing my !vote but, right now, the sources just are not adequate. — His book may qualify for an article under  though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NBOOKS)

Comment: A long article with only two sources; topic is not notable per  and is largely an essay and may also violate copyright and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:OR)

Comment: There are certainly potential notability claims here that could get him a Wikipedia article if he could be properly sourced over  for them, but there's nothing here that entitles him to an automatic inclusion freebie just because he exists. There's one short blurb about him, which is not substantive enough to carry a GNG pass as an article's ''only'' reliable source, but everything else is either a |primary source that cannot support notability in a Wikipedia article or an inherently unreliable source: Ancestry.com, his own staff profiles, the sales page of his book on an online bookstore, a review of his book on a non-notable blog, and another newspaper piece in which he's the ''author'', not the subject. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a person notable enough for a Wikipedia article, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to hand him a free exemption from having to be referenced properly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)