Deletion of ActiveMedia

Comment: promotional, lacks independent sources. Fails . As a capper has hateful little &trade; symbols throughout like we're a press release repository
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: based upon nomination statement - nominating a Article for Deletion '''6 minutes''' after its creation citing that there is a lack of sources ? good grief ! Saying it was Spammy or Advertorial I could understand ... but lack of sources ? The Article creator has added external links and Ref's within 10.5 hours of your AfD'ing this article. I would request that in future the nom allow more than minutes countable on fingers and toes in between article creation and AfD nominations, to allow ''some'' time for an article natural growth. We must ''Assume Good Faith'' in that newly created Articles will improove. That being said, the Article creator should read  so that he/she does not go to far and ''create'' grounds for deletion. This is all stuph that could have been dealt with on the relevent talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: promotional material, and sources provided are not independent enough for my liking.  No assertion that the awards that they've won or the organisations that they've joined are particularly notable at all.  With that said, taking the article to AfD less than ten minutes after creation is a pretty bite-y thing to do, even if there is  issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)