Deletion of Ayana Jordan

Comment: There's no sign of  C1, although it's a solid start for this assistant professor.  The awards are strictly early career, given more for promise than for achievement, so no  C2.  No signs of C3-C6, and C8 is only for chief editors.  C7 essentially says that GNG applies to professors (and their work).  As far as GNG goes, I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources here, although there are several passing mentions.  I expect that the subject will eventually become notable, but it's  for now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Because Jordan has been quoted in many national news sources, including (https://www.nbcnews.com/health/mental-health/drug-overdose-deaths-drop-u-s-other-deaths-despair-rise-n1211376 NBC News, https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/amplify-black-voices-medicine-non-black-doctors-hand-over-their-n1231703 NBC News, https://www.newsweek.com/black-lives-matter-protests-are-running-much-more-anger-opinion-1511982 Newsweek), to name a few, she meets  criteria 7: The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think there's just enough to make the argument for #C7 (impact outside academia in an academic capacity). There's more than just brief quotations from a local talking head; they describe substantial work, though not in as much detail as I'd like to see
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Jordan has been quoted in a variety of national new sources listed above. Most notably, her work in Sierra Leonne and advocacy referenced in the New Yorker, as well as being director of various outreach and rehabilitation initiatives would fall under  criteria 7. Professor Jordan is a highly respected member within academic circles both within Yale and at an international level. Additionally, her awards seem to suggest they would be prestigious enough to meet criteria 2 of  as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Subject has been quoted in many US national news sources. Meets  criteria 7: The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Insufficient evidence of the impact for her research that would be needed to pass #C1. Early-career awards insufficient for #C2. No other evidence of notability. (Incidentally, {{u|Microglia145}} should be advised to pay attention to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: Subject is cited and interviewed in multiple national media outlets. Cursory search of her name in Google yields multiple recent interviews and quotes in NBC news, Shape, and Newsweek. Meets  criteria 7: The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.  She also may meet criteria 3 due to her position on the board of trustees of the American Psychiatric Association, and she sits on the editorial board for the Lancet Psychiatry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I added the citation on her contributions to the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine efforts. Her coverage on MedPage Today is another indication of her notability. (https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/85576), she meets  criteria 7
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per above and her coverage in various national news outlets. However, I am concerned about that Twitter thread previously posted, https://twitter.com/dvmphd2be/status/1276534092322861056 one user wrote: "A great way to make change is to establish a Wikipedia account and begin contributing yourself. My DMs are open for those who want to learn how!" That cannot lead to anything good given our  policies with respect to this article and its AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT)

Comment: All the h-index hand wringing above completely ignores the fact that the subject most assuredly meets . A google search shows that this Yale professor has had loads of significant coverage related to her substance abuse work (https://www.nbcnews.com/health/mental-health/drug-overdose-deaths-drop-u-s-other-deaths-despair-rise-n1211376 NBC News, https://www.wbur.org/commonhealth/2018/05/24/blacks-dying-more-from-opioid-overdoses-than-whites WBUR), on her methadone patients (https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/z3b5nj/coronavirus-shows-just-how-cruel-our-drug-laws-are-for-pain-patients-and-methadone-users Vice) and the role of telemedicine during the pandemic (https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/85576 MedPage Today), methadone precriptions (https://www.thelancet.com/lanpsy/audio Lancet), the effect of cannabis on the brain https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/25244/, and whether people are getting high on wasp spray. (https://www.inverse.com/article/57876-meth-overdoses-are-probably-not-caused-by-wasp-spray Inverse)  She sits on the board of trustees of the American Psychiatry Assocation https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/home/news/new-apa-president-takes-office-as-the-first-african-american-to-lead-the-organization/, studied mental health in Sierra Leone (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/07/the-refugee-dilemma The New Yorker), is medical director of one of Yale's training programs https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/19204/, and is principal investigator for Imani Breakthrough Recovery. (https://www.drugaddictionnow.com/2018/05/22/drug-and-alcohol-treatment-hartford-supported-new-program/)  She also recently received media coverage for her role in SharetheMic (https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/amplify-black-voices-medicine-non-black-doctors-hand-over-their-n1231703 NBC News, https://www.shape.com/lifestyle/mind-and-body/share-the-mic-now-med-campaign-black-female-doctors Shape) and her opinion on the George Floyd protests. (https://www.newsweek.com/black-lives-matter-protests-are-running-much-more-anger-opinion-1511982 Newsweek) All together, these multiple independent sources demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: With a GS h-index of only 5 (30-40 would be expected for a high-cited field like this), there does not appear to be a pass of rof#C1. Looks like oo soon
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: She seems to have enough coverage, and appears to be attaining more over time. I don't think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, she's won a fair bit of reputable awards and has attracted significant coverage in reputable, recent sources in her work. She meets the  criteria as well as #7 and the basic criteria of . The H-index measure doesn't really tell the full story here; she passes the WP policies and characteristics needed as well as retaining significant coverage in reputable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BIO)