Deletion of Elfwood

Comment: violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Claims "Elfwood is the largest science fiction and fantasy art site in the world" which would make for a notability argument.  This is not OR, but autobiographical statement.  See uto for inclusion criteria.  Also found in books here http://books.google.com/books?lr=&q=Elfwood.com&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0.  I'd say any site that makes it into a top list of sites on the internet is a keeper.  And frankly see for yourself is NOT original research.  It's called examining the subject and seeing what is known about it.  And hey, if you think that facts such as the type of PC being used, or the software distro, maybe we should delete Google platform or the software and hardware section of Wikipedia.  Of course, you could just recognize that one sentence that is part of a larger article is not something you should throw on the AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: No third-party sources means it fails  and . "See for yourself" is |original research, not a |reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:WEB||WP:OR||WP:RS)