Deletion of Historical persecution by Christians (second nomination)

Comment: This, just like the others, looks to me as violation of  in taking persecutions that occurred over time by unrelated parties and grouping them all in this big net
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Other Historical persecution articles don't set a precedent in this case, as deletion arguments for those included (1) inadequately sourced and (2) not enough information for an entire article.  Neither of these criticisms apply to this article, which is well sourced and quite detailed.  I'm not sure how this constitutes , as the only position it appears to advance (i.e., that historically, Christians have been involved in persecution on religious grounds) is well documented by the sources used.  This seems to me to negate the point of the entire "synthesis" argument.  As to the contemporary section, I have become convinced since the last AFD that it is appropriate (providing an overview as it does of modern issues that may be considered historical).  Since the last AFD, I have removed some original research from this section, thus addressing concerns that were raised during that AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: As regards NPOV concerns, I can't see why this is an issue.   requires us to "represent fairly and without bias all significant views (that have been published by reliable sources)."  If a significant view that has been published by a reliable source on this subject is not covered, there is no reason it cannot be added.  This becomes an article cleanup issue, not a deletion one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: why is persecution of Christians NPOV, but Historical persecution by Christians not? This isn't a rhetorical question btw, and I am aware of , but it does seem rather odd
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)