Deletion of People questioning the 9/11 Commission Report (2nd nomination)

Comment: the article has been an |owned article for a long time. Furthermore, it is a fork as mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: See #Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:POV||WP:BALLS)

Comment: along with Researchers into Criticisms and/or 9/11 Commission Report after taking a nice whack out of it with .  Why is this spread out over 4 crappy articles when it could be one/two decent one(s
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: into 9/11_Commission_Report, to the extent it meets .  (''Researchers'' is plausible, but I think the report article, itself, should include the critism.)  &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: entries for which |reliable sources can be found with Researchers questioning the official account of 9/11, then '''rename''' to People who have questioned the findings in the 9/11 Commission Report or similar per Vizjim's comments. There's no reason for these articles to be split, especially since the Researchers article already contains Researchers_questioning_the_official_account_of_9/11#Other_notable_people_questioning_the_common_account_of_9.2F11|this section of "other notable people" that is more fleshed out then anything in the People article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)