Deletion of Lucas Luiz Scalon

Comment: With only a single 46 minute substitute appearance in a professional league the "presumption" of notability is thin even if that is technically meeting NFOOTBALL. Now signed for India I-League team but no evidence he has played yet or generated in depth coverage, fails WP:GNG. If he starts getting games in India - which is admittedly likely given he is filling a foreign quota slot - it can be easily recreated, but for now it is  per . Nominated too early, wouldn't have hurt to wait a few weeks until the league was underway. Club
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Passes |NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a |fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Has played for one team in a fully professional competition and is now signed for another team in a fully professional competition, the examples noted above are not similar players
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL)

Comment: Per Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_SPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|this discussion, subject-specific |notability guidelines do not supersede the |general notability guideline, except in clear cases where |GNG does not apply to. ''As it is the single most recent consensus on the notability of sport bios'', I feel obliged to go with the result of the discussion: '''NSPORTS does not supersede GNG'''. This really does need to be reflected on sport guideline pages, though, as this can seriously mislead people. The 'weak' is rather because that closure has not been linked or obeyed much, and is not in common use. Also, I will note that less coverage has to be applied for this article to be considered notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)