Deletion of CBIZ (2nd nomination)

Comment: So I looked at the impressive number of references and thought "how can an article this well cited be at AfD?"  Then I started checking the references.  Every single one of them is trivial mention of the company or .  Most of the independent articles are really about other companies that CBIZ has bought out... the coverage is far more detailed on the targets of the acquisitions, not CBIZ.  Not wanting to give up so quickly, I ran a search through Highbeam Research and came up with ''nothing'' better than the current crop of references.  This is a subject that appears notable, but on further inspection, clearly fails the .  All of this is independent of the issues with the author/creator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:GNG)