Deletion of Nazism in Arab Palestine

Comment: very little about the purported topic, "Nazism in Arab Palestine", but basically a  of every connection to fascism in the Arab world that someone could dredge up, in addition to more COATRACK sections and BLP violations pertaining to alleged Holocaust revisionism/denial and so on. The small amount of legitimate information here is either already in more appropriate articles (such as the Mohammad Amin al-Husseini|al-Husseini article) or is presented completely without context. Also concur with the nominator's comments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: it is not a bad article, but is a mess of a |coatrack, an exemplar of the genre. It has a nice image, is well-cited, and looks fine, but |synthesizes and cherry picking|cherry picks the worse of Anti-Zionism and conflates it with being Neo-Nazi. The article has been created at a particularly inauspicious time, when the Peace Process has started up again, and several sources have accused Wikipedia of being too pro-Isreal or too pro-Palestinian.  I would be agreeable to incubation of this article by someone else, but I would not touch it with a |ten-foot stick. I am still considered suspect by some for tcreatign the wholly NPOV Palestinian law, and as a sysop I need to remain neutral on such substantive issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:SYNTH||WP:STICK)

Comment: I agree that this article relies on many unreliable sources (some books listed in the reference section could be considered reliable, but I am not sure) and seems to push a particular POV against our |policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: for all of the above reasons and the lack of any redeeming features. The article in its current form is just a selective dump of allegations mostly made by political activists for Israel.  Some are true and some are not, but the bringing together of this material to create an overall case is such an obvious and blatant violation of  that the article should have been speedy-deleted rather than brought here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: most of the sources are not RS (either obviously biased, or self-published) and what little real content there is isn't enough to base an article on. Blatant  on a lot of the assertions, and a distinct lack of notability for some of the others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WEASEL)

Comment: There is some serious POV coatracking towards the end of the article, but Nazism in Arab Palestine is an actual and important topic. Anyone who wasn't aware of this should read the ample high-quality sources provided in the article. The nom's statement is entirely based on ad hominem and appeal to motive. Gatoclass' idea of moving the good material in this article to Haj Amin al-Husseini is surprising, since the topic and the good material are clearly broader than that one individual. The rest of the delete votes are either s or not policy based at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE)

Comment: per , , and . The page creator apparently has a POV to push
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:SYNTH||WP:NOR)

Comment: Has someone been canvassing offwiki? Two of the three "keep" comments above are from IP addresses |with no other contributions. Looks very suspicious to me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP: SPA)