Deletion of Speers Ponder

Comment: doesn't seem to meet notability requirements. As a military man, he doesn't seem to have had any significance (no important commands/roles, no significant advances, no awards, etc.) per . There's also some gaps in his history that lend me to think his duties and accomplishments were routine in nature, namely, what exactly was he doing in WWII (the current "served in a variety of theaters" is far to vague to mean anything)? What about Korea? What was his role in the Chemical Corps? I can't speak very intelligently to his academic role, but it does seem he fails . Add to that a general  and  failures, the article doesn't have a leg to stand on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: It seems clear that he does not pass  for his academic work, so we have to rely on  for his military work. But the sources that have been provided are completely inadequate for that: we don't have any third-party sources that cover him in any depth, instead we have two sources that merely name-check him and two patents he wrote (not third-party
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Too little coverage to demonstrate notability under either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)