Deletion of Buster Gonad

Comment: In the future, I would advise you to create an article/stub with |notability established from the beginning with |references from |verifiable sources.  You can't continue to use the argument of "allowing it to grow".  Yes, a stub should be given an opportunity to do so, but if there is no notability shown from the very start, it's going to be very hard to justify its inclusion.  I did a Google Search (both web and news) before I nominated it, and I was unable to find any verifiable sources within the first 3-4 pages of search results (there were no results at all for the news search).  I would recommend you start going through the other Viz (comic)|Viz comics and ensure all their notability is established before another one gets nominated for AFD by someone else
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CITE||WP:V)

Comment: this argument by far has the most weight of any of the previous ones.  Had these sources been cited in the article, I would probably have never put it up for AFD.  However, even these articles are pushing the cusp of "if they have received '''substantial''' coverage in reliable secondary sources." definition for .  They all mention Buster Gonad, but the character is not the subject of the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)