Deletion of Luigi Bellotti

Comment: Bishops of major denominations are invariably considered to be notable by long consensus. See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES)

Comment:  is an essay and not an official policy. It concerns me that there is not even one source among the many cited in the article where Luigi Bellotti is the main subject and is covered in depth. It doesn't seem right that  and   should be used to skirt around basic policies on notability and verifiability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES||WP:BISHOPS)

Comment: as there is enough reliable sources coverage for  and articles do not have to have the subject as the main focus if they still include significant coverage about it, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject is covered by several independent reliable sources, including the US State Department. Per , "Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office" are presumed notable; would not a diplomat be a holder of international office
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)