Deletion of Marcus Giavanni

Comment: Agreeing with opinions of above editors and  as Marcus Giovanni is not notable enough to be on an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: An unsuccessful candidate for office does not get over  on that basis, but may have a Wikipedia article ''only'' if you can properly demonstrate and source that they would qualify for a Wikipedia article for some ''other'' reason ''independent'' of their candidacy. But that hasn't been shown here, as there's no sourcing or substance about anything but his candidacies. Agreed that it's an outright delete and not a suitable redirect — nothing here suggests that he's remotely plausible as a topic that people would ''actually'' be looking for on Wikipedia. "Google+ Conversation Authority" certainly is not a substantive claim of notability, for the record — if I do a web search on that term with a "-giavanni" constraint to filter this particular one out of the results, there are just eight hits left of which every last one is an irrelevant string of SEO keyword salad in a page ''within'' Giavanni's real estate site that's already noted in the nomination. So ''none'' of them proves that anybody else really thinks that's a real thing, and accordingly I'm getting a distinct whiff of self-promotional  here even if I can't prove that outright
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:COI)

Comment: I found trivial mentions, mainly in the context of the write-in campaigns, but substantial coverage from independent, |reliable sources is absent. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per above and close per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)