Deletion of Diane Lockward

Comment: per .  Makes claims enough to avoid being a speedy delete, but no genuinely substantial claim of notability.  Also appears to be a COI/spam issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Neither |conflict of interest, nor |single purpose accounts represent valid reasons for deletion although they do indicate greater scrutiny needs to be made of the article and referencing.  Lockward has been reviewed in |reliable sources.  The Harvard Review has http://hcl.harvard.edu/harvardreview/OnlineJournal/HRO_6/reviews/LockwardTesser.html published a review of ''Temptation by Water''.  From AL.com, we have http://www.al.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2012/01/book_review_poet_donna_lockwar.html another review.  Inlcuded in this http://books.google.ca/books?id=Ap2kpWhee8cC&pg=PA316&lpg=PA316&dq=%22Diane+Lockward%22+poetry&source=bl&ots=1QujT6qSY_&sig=B6S0G7MuOLAdW1JmnsokACEbq08&hl=en&sa=X&ei=aTn5UbSEOYzfqAHLooHgBA&ved=0CHAQ6AEwCDgy#v=onepage&q=%22Diane%20Lockward%22%20poetry&f=false book from Penguin Books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SPA||WP:RS)

Comment: Absolutely no outside sources to support notability. Article has been created and modified exclusively by Deeward0807, who is the sole proponent of keeping it and has not edited any articles other that this one, providing a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)