Deletion of Richard Marzouka

Comment: no assertion of notability, no references, a general failure after reasonable search for anything that is definitively this guy. Bing turned up a http://www.zacks.com/commentary/2685/remarzouka ''weak'' match (roughly right age, right middle initial, investment related, but no other corroboration so coincidence is reasonable too), but this is the only thing, not a  and is not even close to sufficient to pass  if it were and if it's even him. Probably should have been prod'ed first, but whatever works for improving the encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: nothing significant in Google http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22Richard+Marzouka%22 news, http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22Richard%20Marzouka%22&sa=N&tab=np books, or http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?um=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22Richard%20Marzouka%22&sa=N&tab=ps scholar to indicate the subject meets  inclusion requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)