Deletion of David Aronov

Comment: fails . Non-notable candidate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: People do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates for political offices they have not won, but this (a) makes no credible claim that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy, (b) makes no credible claim that his candidacy is markedly more special than everybody else's candidacies in any way that would pass the |ten year test, and (c) is referenced entirely to |primary sources and neighbourhood hyperlocals that don't clinch a  pass. Even if he had a strong notability claim, it would still have to be referenced better than this. Obviously no prejudice against recreation if he actually wins, but nothing here already justifies an article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject fails both  and . There is negligible coverage of the subject in news sources with only 2 article I could find that too very localised
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails . Being a candidate for local office does not warrant notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)