Deletion of Resonance (MIT)

Comment: no reason to delete.  I'm going to suggest, per Isopropyl, that  should be ''ignored'' here.  The article is well written with a neutral and encyclopedic tone — unlike most band articles that hit AfD, this isn't a blatant attempt at self-promotion, nor is it particularly |crufty.  Not everything that ''may'' be deleted according to policy ''must'' be deleted.  In my opinion, losing this article would be a net loss for the encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Resonance won a couple http://www.casa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=346&Itemid=149 CASA awards, and they've gone on tours http://web.mit.edu/resonance/www/schedule/index.html. Other than that, there aren't a whole lot of college a cappella groups who release albums on major labels. Not passing  is not an automatic deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: and cleanup. Failing that, '''merge''' into an article on MIT music groups. It's definately '''''not''''' a speedy candidate, and as  noted above, they meet  (which as a guideline really doesn't work here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)