Deletion of Impact of the Arab Spring

Comment: The Arab Spring article is too long to keep all of the related protests in it. Some of the protests in this article have no RS linking them to the Arab Spring. They can be "citation needed"-tagged and if no citations turn up within a reasonable delay, removed from this article. But other ones - such as the US Winconsin and Occupy protests and PRChina protests have plenty of RS (e.g. chairman of the United States House Committee on the Budget, a very famous linguist, a wikipedia-notable journalist) giving POVs that the protests are inspired by the Arab Spring. Because of |demographic bias among en.wikipedia editors (not our fault!), it is difficult for many editors to see Arab/non-Arab world sociology as a spectrum rather than a binary black/white structure. Our demographic bias as editors should not lead us to ignore the RS's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: This isn't "''Impact of the arab spring''" at all, it's "''List a bunch of protests around the world and imply that they're all triggered by the arab spring''". Even ones which had their origins well before the arab spring or where there's an obvious alternative cause. We already have articles on practically all of these protests, and indeed we have some existing lists of protests which are framed more neutrally, so en.wikipedia would be much better off without this duplication and |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Weird - this is like a reverse-
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: This article is chuck full of , the only way I can see it being salvaged as if the  is removed and just the countries that have multiple references that imply the connectuion to the arab spring are left in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OR)