Deletion of Karmyn Tyler

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: I'll admit that some of the references are bad and smell like  (the citation to a Wikipedia article, for instance, can go, it isn't helping anything). There are a few more of questionable independence or reliability, (YouTube, iTunes, IMDB...) but there are still two or three real citations. The substantial bio in http://hotspringsdaily.com/former-hot-springs-native-to-appear-in-feature-film-candles/ this newspaper,  and http://business.wesrch.com/paper-details/press-paper-BU187QLRAGLTO-karmyn-tyler-the-2-time-grammy-nominated-artist-is-coming-up-with-her-new-show-on-october-22nd this are the best. The second one also shows that Tyler has been nominated for Grammy Award|a notable award twice, thus allowing her to pass . She also passes  given the sources (which are already in the article). Finally, I haven't checked whether this person meets MUSICBIO, but whether she does or doesn't is irrelevant as long as she meets ''a'' relevant notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBLOAT||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: I don't normally work on musician articles so I'm not super familiar with . I do know that being nominated twice for a Grammy Award is a big deal and sure smells that it should make one notable. I know it would under many of the other |biography policies. The references cited by {{u|Jakec}} don't exactly blow me away. The first is a local paper and the second is a press release which doesn't help establish |notability. Still, I can't really get past the Grammy thing. Are there are less valuable Grammy Awards I don't know about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:BIO||WP:N)