Deletion of Standard Portable Intermediate Representation

Comment: Doesn't seem like a case of  to me - the standard has been around for a while, and the article doesn't have to be exclusively about SPIR-V (though considering that it's completely rewritten, this choice of version numbering seems strange). There's a little bit of coverage in the kinds of places you'd expect to cover such a niche topic - http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE4MzM Phoronix on the 2012 1.0 draft, http://www.anandtech.com/show/8360/khronos-announces-opencl-spir-20 Anandtech and http://www.techenablement.com/commercial-opencl-spir-2-0-protects-ip-yet-allows-powerful-portable-source-code-free-kernels/ TechEnablement on the 2014 2.0 version, https://appdevelopermagazine.com/2462/2015/3/4/Khronos-Group-Introduces-New-Vulkan-Hardware-Driver-API-and-SPIR-V-Intermediate-Language-Shared-by-Vulkan-and-OpenCL-2.1/ App Developer Magazine on the 2015 release, now-out-of-date https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/using-spir-for-fun-and-profit-with-intel-opencl-code-builder Intel Tutorial. Not exactly in-depth, true, but enough to prevent the waste of deleting the article and recreating it again in a few months. (BTW, PianoDan, some of the standards in this navbox family might be borderline but OpenCL, OpenGL, etc.? Not in doubt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This IR has been recently announced, but is not used anywhere. It seems this is a case of --not enough time has elapsed for this IR to gain multiple in depth reliable sources needed for notability per . Maybe when OpenCL 2.1 comes out with SPIR as the IR, this will gain more notability over time. But until then, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)