Deletion of Glen Tapia

Comment: Glen Tapia is notable.  The article is well-written and well-sourced.  It should not be deleted.  Furthermore, the policy that you cite () is a red herring.  That policy states: "''A boxer is presumed notable if he or she ... meets the following criteria''."  That policy does not limit notability to those criteria.  It simply states that if a boxer meets those criteria, he is presumed notable.  It does not work "in the negative".  It does ''not'' say that a boxer must meet those criteria in order to be notable.  It does ''not'' say that if a boxer does not meet those criteria, then he is not notable.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOX)

Comment: A generous reading of  might support a claim of notability for his NABO title fights.  I do not see the significant coverage in reliable sources required to meet  (which is WP's main criteria).  Being Pacquiao's sparring partner is a clear case of  and other coverage is routine sports reporting (and is badlefthook.com really a reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOX||WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)