Deletion of Anthony Irby (1577–1610)

Comment: I disagree that "Knighthood meets  #1". Those making this argument don't explain why knighthood is a "well-known and significant award or honor*. My understanding is that British knighthoods are basically given out like candy to rich donors or the period equivalent. Being rich or influential enough to get a knighthood doesn't establish notability. Proper sourcing does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: This article is no model of clarity, but the knighthood meets  #1. (There's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: While arguing the significance of the title we are sort of side-stepping the |genealogical aspect as three of the six sources use the word. I would have to agree that the likely ''The Most Noble Order of the Garter'' (possibly but not sure) is one of the highest but is that ''one thing'' (being an investor is not a criterion) enough or even really being rich enough to have a lavish grave? The "Tomb of Sir Anthony Irby" might artistically be more notable. Maybe there should be a list of |barely notable knights
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:BARE)