Deletion of Qazi Shibli

Comment: Needs multiple independent sources giving significant coverage- he has one and several local ones he may be connected to. Perhaps a , but not currently notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The offline peer reviewed journal article I cited above is a significant source. The deletion votes have not accounted for the offline reference when weighing . That and the the ''Time'' story in addition to the global press coverage is enough to meet the multiple sources requirement of GNG in my opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per . Particularly significant is a peer reviewed journal article which focuses on Shibli in more detail: {{cite journal|author=Bilal Ahmad Pandow|work=Index On Censorship|date=September 2020|volume=49|issue=3|page=17-19|title="The idea is to kill journalism": Kashmiri journalists on what it's like working under lockdown, an internet blackout and a new draconian media law}} The ''Time'' article is also significant and there are other sources which I will list here. See https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2020/0707/Kashmir-s-media-survived-blackout-but-warn-of-shrinking-freedoms Christian Science Monitor, https://www.livemint.com/mint-lounge/features/why-cpj-is-demanding-the-release-of-kashmiri-journalist-asif-sultan-11598552201519.html Mint (newspaper), and {{cite news|title=India: Abuses Persist in Jammu and Kashmir|work=Asia News Monitor|date=August 5, 2020}}. All put together and this meets GNG. Appologies for no urls for some of the sources, but I accessed them through my university library and they are not available for free online
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)