Deletion of List of Sabrina Carpenter live performances

Comment: or '''Merge''' per the many reasons I provided for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Taylor Swift live performances|keeping the live performances article of a way bigger artist. I'm saying Weak Keep, however, because Sabrina has had less time in the spotlight than Gaga and Swfit, and thus she has had far less performances at significant events to list. There are also more local radio performances listed here, which I would legitimately argue would fall moreso into the line of being  than the more significant performances listed in both Gaga and Swift's lists. We really need some sort of guideline or consensus on what is considered fancruft with live performances, because (and this is just my perspective and I don't mean to strawman anyone's arguments) users are just throwing the term "fancruft" around or are bowing their heads to more experienced users on what is fancruft or not without questioning anything, even knowing what readers are interested in a topic, or how significant the items in a list article are.  is an argument to avoid in a deletion discussion, after all. I know users' comments in discussions like these are biased and opinionated to an extent, but we're getting overly-subjective with our decisions when it comes to debates on supposed fancruft articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:WHOCARES)

Comment: to Sabrina Carpenter#Tours, which can easily incorporate the annotated tables and the rest could probably be trimmed; that section currently just contains a bare list. I'd caution the nom against these repeated boilerplate copy-and-paste nominations, as it suggests that they are not actually looking carefully at each article and judging its potential as required per . Here the headlining tours ''don't'' have their own articles, the bluelinks instead redirect to this list (and have for at least two years), so the nomination rests on an incorrect assertion that should have been very easy to discover. Also, as noted in a related AFD by the same nom, even if it were true that the listed tours had their own articles, the whole point of such a list is to provide an overview of a related group in one place, so saying "you can find this information by clicking in and out of a dozen separate articles" is no argument for deletion. I don't see that the state of current sourcing is relevant here either, certainly information about a tour conducted by a notable performer is verifiable. But the nom does not address potential as they must in an AFD, just what they are seeing at present
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)