Deletion of Executive Order 13765

Comment: improper use of WP article delete procedure. This process is for identifying topics that *should not* be articles in WP. It is not meant for poorly written articles, which should be listed at , not here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: Passes . The objections of several here could be dealt with by improving the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes . This article definitely needs expansion, but the executive order has received coverage from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/upshot/what-does-the-order-against-the-health-law-actually-do.html ''The New York Times'', http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/20/politics/trump-signs-executive-order-on-obamacare/ CNN, and https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/01/23/can-president-trumps-executive-order-unravel-the-affordable-care-act/ ''The Washington Post'', among others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per above, passes , content can be added into other relevant articles, but there's no reason why we should not ''also'' have a separate article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Who says a simple executive order is independently notable? It's . This is sufficiently covered by First 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Just gave it a quick rewrite. Let's avoid a |snow and speedy close this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)