Deletion of Shawn Welling (2nd nomination)

Comment: and |clean up.  I note this was |speedy renominated based upon lack of involvement by others in the AFD  which closed on May 23, 2012. Why not relist again?  However, I also note that Shawn Welling is a multi-award-winning http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3205229/awards filmmaker, who has received recognition and coverage in multiple reliable sources,http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3205229/publicity much of which is not simply "local" Texas coverage.https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Shawn+Welling%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1  We do not expect world-wide notability, and despite the current article |needing work, it is |improvable and  is met.  Less relevent, the IP 89.252.128.80 has been editing only since June 4, 2012,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/89.252.128.80 making (so-far) 17 lifetime edits. If not simply a regular editor who forgot to sign in for a couple weeks, and if not aware when he began nominating articles for deletion, I'm sure he will quickly learn of , , and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP||WP:NPASR||WP:UGLY||WP:ATD||WP:BIO||WP:BEFORE||WP:UGLY||WP:NRVE)

Comment: After several editors (including me) searching hard to try to find the independent reliable source coverage to address the two potential sources of notability mentioned in the comment above, it appears there are simply not enough significant reliable source coverage sources to establish notability of either the awards (which appear to be among several hundred given at that festival), or the "world-class" nature of his choreography.  As such, this appears to be , and hence my !vote for delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: There is a long thread upstream, so I thought it may be useful to summarize the key points to see where we stand and hopefully reach some consensus.  It appears that the primary claims for notability for Welling are his "award winning" movies and his "world-class" choreography.  To evaluate the awards there is a debate as to if the awards are actually notable awards.  People seem to take two views of the notability of the awards.  One line is arguing that it is a notable festival, so the award is notable.  The other argues that regardless of the notability of the festival, there are too many awards for a single award to be notable from that festival.  This is a fairly easy point to resolve.  If the fact that Welling got the award is actually notable, then there should be reliable independent coverage of such award.  If we can turn that up the point will be resolved.  To this point several of us have been looking (and it appears quite hard), yet have not found independent reliable source coverage of him receiving any awards.  Let's find those instead of debating it in theory.  Regarding his "world-class" choreography, let's use the same test.  Let's find independent reliable source coverage discussing him (not discussing the troupe he started, as that would be excellent material for an article about the troupe, but not about him as notability is not inherited).  The material that has turned up so far about his choreography has been mostly non-independent selfpubs - be it links to his own website, or links to businesswire that display a press release he issued.  Let's focus on finding a few sources instead of just theorizing.  If we can find good independent reliable source coverage of him, then he will pass the notability test.  If not, then it really appears it is a case of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)