Deletion of Crieff Hydro

Comment: There seems to be a fair amount of coverage in reliable sources which should be investigated before this topic is deleted, and I am not convinced that the nominator |has done so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Weak delete It's big and old, and I'm told it's a great place to stay. Searching for references in the usual places (Google Books) yields pages of hits but I'm having trouble finding anything but trivial coverage. It's mentioned in tourist guides in the usual fashion, going back to Victorian guides, but I can't find anything that goes beyond a few brief sentences. To the contributing editor: articles about companies/organisations such as this need to demonstrate notability as per the guidelines listed in  or more generally in . Essentially there needs to be significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. AFD nominations don't tend to be placed on the basis of the quality of prose in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)