Deletion of 2014 celebrity pictures hack

Comment: The basis for the AfD, , states that ''"An event is presumed to be notable if it receives significant, non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time. Coverage should be in multiple reliable sources with national or global scope."'' This story is clearly non-routine, received coverage in multiple reliable sources, and its impact are long lasting as to how to prevent such hacking
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: or '''Merge''' into 4chan. Plainly not significant enough per  to warrant its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: setting apart from any moral consideration it simply fails . Wikipedia is not Noah's Ark of the Internet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)

Comment: The article describes a somewhat significant occurrence involving |notable people which seems to have attracted fairly |wide and |in-depth media coverage, and there are strong indications that it will get |much more of it in the future as possible legal action is taken against insert names. Even if we choose to think that the event will be soon forgotten, |we should suppress our urge to rush to delete the article for now – its |deletion can wait until it's abundantly clear that the incident wasn't all that important after all. As for calling it "the fappening," I'm sure everyone here appreciates the crudeness of the phrase, but '''if''' it's indeed what most media outlets refer to it as, |we have little choice but to follow suit; after all, |Wikipedia is not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RAPID||WP:TIND||WP:NC||WP:CENSOR)

Comment: per , the event led the FBI to investigate the hackings and Apple to go ahead with new safety features with their phones to counter a repeat. , there are many reliable sources on the subject that discuss the hackings in detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:DEPTH)

Comment: Article easily meets the , and is quite a notable incident; the hacking of nude photos from multiple viewpoints is very significant and very notable. The threat of legal action for having the photos published even more so makes it notable; it implies that the subject sees it as a notable action to take rather than something so easily dismissed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily passes  This is a major security breach regardless of how it happened. It is not just news, it is a historic event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)