Deletion of Uche Nwosu

Comment: I interpret being the chief of staff and a commissioner to a state government as passing . Believe me, if you are not notable you won't be having major publishing houses covering you like https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/03/tension-imo-okorochas-son-law-declares-guber/ 1, https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/03/breaking-will-not-disrespect-archbishop-obinna-okorocha-son-law-chinonso-alozie-owerri-governor-rochas-okorocha-son-law-mr-uche-nwosu-yesterday-assumpta-cathedral-churc/ 2, http://sunnewsonline.com/imo-guber-my-opponents-are-jittery-says-uche-nwosu/ 3, https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/my-ambition-to-govern-imo-divine-uche-nwosu-255228.html 4, http://dailypost.ng/2018/03/11/2019-okorocha-will-not-dictate-uche-nwosu/ 5, https://www.pmnewsnigeria.com/2013/01/05/okorochas-daughter-marries-his-commissioner/ 6, http://thenationonlineng.net/uche-nwosu-will-better-governor-okorocha/ 7 all in the first page of Google search. I admire your work Mahveotm, but I feel like this nomination was a little too hasty
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: since  accepts {{tq|politicians who have held national office}} and, in practice, we interpret this, at least for the United States of America,  to include ''all'' Deputy Chiefs of Staff, e.g. Michael Deaver, Zachary Fuentes, Henson Moore, and so on. Accepting as notable the '''Deputy Chief of Staff''' position for American political appointments but not for Nigerian ones would be List of people pardoned or granted clemency by the President of the United States|unpardonable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: as per  AND . Terrible nomination, nominating a state official! A simple  and reference to Wiki policy would have substantiated the notability of the subject rather than wasting the community's time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Being chief of staff to a state-level politician is ''not'' an automatic free pass over  in and of itself, and the sourcing being cited here is ''not'' adequate to get him over . One of the three sources is |primary, while another reads suspiciously more like PR bumf than journalism — and at least as of the time I'm writing this, the third takes me not to any content about the subject that I can even evaluate for its reliability or lack thereof, but to the confrontational splash page of a cyberhacker group. This is not the correct kind of sourcing to make a person notable because "media coverage exists", if what he's potentially notable for isn't an automatic guarantee of inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)