Deletion of List of leading shopping streets and districts by city

Comment: WP is |not a collector of links, nor an |indiscriminate collector of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLINK||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: the criteria for inclusion is vauge, vast, subjective and relative to the culture, size and affluence of a place. Some of the entries on the list contradict the criteria - e.g. if only the largest cities have more than two at most such areas, why are there three distinct areas in Cardiff (only the List of largest United Kingdom settlements by population|14th most populous city in the UK). It does not normally distinguish between adjacent streets with similar character (e.g. Bristol) and distinct areas within a large metropolitan area (e.g. Birmingham). Where it does distinguish it does this in multiple ways (e.g. compare London and Cardiff). Finally, without any sources the whole thing smacks of |original research. If there is value in a list like this (and I'm not convinced there is, although well defined and sourced lists for metropolitan areas within a country might have merit) then it will be much easier to start again with soruces that demonstrate the entries meet the well-defined objective criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)