Deletion of Baptistry heater

Comment: On the sole ground of failing . I can understand why doubts about  arise, but 1) reading its history, I can't exclude that the article creation was just a good-faith tentative of writing a page about a non-notable product, 2) being a non-notable product, the main references that can be easily found are websites created by marketers, 3) the citation of manufacturing companies is something that can be included in an article in some circumstances and, as such, not an issue ''per se'' and 4) the perceived PROMO nature is in a debatable gray area, which would consume community resources. That's why I've motivated my vote citing only the notability issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Fails , possible also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Fails . Search for reliable sources turned up one 1911 reference to an index of Popular Mechanics articles, and all others were either advertisements or narrative accounts of failures, fires, or miscellaneous experiences with cold water in the baptistry. There is also a http://books.google.com/books?id=PP5ULwEACAAJ&dq=baptistry+heaters&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NDpMVL6NBYKIigLOIg&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA|Google Book of 56 pages, comprised of articles from "Wikipedia or other free sources online." But not a notable subject under Wikipedia policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)