Deletion of Klomentum

Comment: to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign- It seems to already get a mention in the main article.  If there is anything notable in this article that isn't in the main article then it should be merged. The term is only notable as it pertains to the 2020 Klobuchar campaign. The fact that the campaign and the media can't even agree on a single term Klobusurge/Klobucharge/Klobmentum/Klomentum is probably a good indication that the term itself doesn't meet  as it is just used as a term to describe her "momentum" in the race
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. Typical  over the smallest shreds of churnalism What's next, Klomentum in March 2019? February 10, 2020 Amy Klobuchar CBS interview?? News agencies are desperate for readers so they churn out daily drivel and incestuously report on each other's content (or list reaction of random Twitter users) to fulfill their click-bait quota.  Wikipedia articles should always be more restrained
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign. A media catchphrase should be mentioned in the context of the campaign, but isn't suitable for a stand-alone article; it's extremely unlikely it will ever be used except  to refer to her campaign. Per , I think the current coverage clearly ''uses'' the term, rather than is ''about'' the term
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: to Amy Klobuchar 2020 presidential campaign per above and close per ''''''. This article was rather irresponsibly cited by ''The New York Times'' https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-bloomberg.html which hastens the importance of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:DEADLINENOW)