Deletion of Amanda Knox (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per nom. Although  ''permits'' an article about a person who receives persistent coverage ("may be appropriate"), it does not ''require'' it. Here, the article's content can easily be folded into the murder article, to the extent it's not already there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or else '''Delete''', per Mario, and in this case . The trials are the only notable thing about this subject. Even her notability based on the ''calunnia'' trial is predicated entirely on the notability of the murder. As Bbb23 rightly points out, there's nothing in BLP1E that commands a stand-alone article. Everything noteworthy about this subject can be (and is likely already) adequately covered within two existing articles on Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito and Murder of Meredith Kercher
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: It doesn't matter how high profile the individual is, or how high profile the event is, if they are only notable for a single event (which the murder/trial/appeal etc. effectively is) then BLP1E applies.  Without wanting to invoke , I'd suggest that editors look at, for example, Myra Hindley, possibly the most famous British murderess in history
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST)

Comment: I said this during the recent DRV and I'll say it again: Once the media started focusing on Knox's personal life outside of her role in the Kercher case, she outgrew . At this point, her personal objections (if any) would carry little weight (Would we delete the articles of world leaders and/or celebrities upon their requests?). The article has developed steadily over the past several weeks, and I see great potential for more development; the timing of this nomination is akin to throwing the baby out with the bath water
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: No part of  is violated, the person has made the headlines of newspapers and media networks world wide, endless internet articles can be found on this person, even a movie has been made if this person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject definitely meets criteria for notability. It is illogical to think we won't be hearing from her in the future after the trial is ended. Compare with the legions of individuals who are  we have never heard of. Come on, folks, move on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)