Deletion of Futurecon

Comment: It is culturally important to the growth of Toronto sci-fi convention scene, much like other new this year events like SFContario. Also note that given his update history, Deepsix66 seems to be using Wikipedia for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BATTLEGROUND)

Comment: I'm not seeing any coverage in |reliable sources—which is not surprising for an inaugural event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I don't wish to get more involved in the continued Emily Schooley fiasco, but the editors voting keep must seek to show that this event meets the requirements of  (please click and read that link thoroughly): has it ''received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject''? All other details are effectively irrelevant and will not carry much weight with the closing admin
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This should be a slam dunk.  A one-night SF relaxicon that hasn't happened yet, sourced solely through its own web page and Twitter feeds?  This isn't a "convention."  It's a (projected) New Year's Eve party.  Fails ,  and probably most any other policy you can imagine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)