Deletion of Wedgie (4th nomination)

Comment: The article would be better-supported as part of the "school pranks" article. There is already a section devoted to wedgies, therefore it would be a better thing to delete this article and use the information in the main "school pranks" article. Also, this article was in a poor state when I found it and cleaned it up. The article was little more than a glorified pop-culture section. Now the article is little more than a glorified dictionary entry. Remember, |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia is not a dictionary either. Note this statement on the "What Wikipedia is Not" page "Although articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic, they should provide other types of information about that topic as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Article meets . Just because it may attract vandelism is no rational for deleting it. If that were the case, George W. Bush would have been deleted long ago. The article is a lot better than it was since an industrious editor has clean much of the garbage out.  In any case, the Wedgie is a significant part of pop culture, there's a lot of literature about it as well. Certainly the article could use some expansion and sourcing, but that doesn't justify deleting it, especially since it meets grounds for inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)