Deletion of Starjammers

Comment: The sources above seem to be passing mention after passing mention. Sources on fiction need to have some kind of real world information to be considered significant per  and . If the source regurgitates the plot or offers up a passing mention, it doesn't provide significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF||WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: per nom and TTN. Fails the significant mention criterion of GNG no matter how much it gets ed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: The sources provided give enough real world info, and pass . GNG is a relatively low bar to pass, and I don't see that it contains anything about the info having to be analytical in nature. Yes, the article is largely plot and could do with substantial trimming, but 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)