Deletion of Carrom Association of Maldives

Comment: isn't notable just because it's from the Maldives.  does not trump 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:V)

Comment: Here, I think that  trumps  and . According to .mv|our article, the .mv domain is used mostly by the government and large businesses. It isn't surprising that there aren't many sources. Also, how is the sport's being not well-known reason for deletion? I understand the argument that  isn't, alone, sufficient ground for keeping, but deleting the article because Carrom isn't a  well-known sport seems pretty biased to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BIAS)

Comment: The nominator's points are well-taken, but we are talking about a national association in the Maldives (not exactly a media hot spot).  Thus, doing Google searches for Maldives-related news will inevitably come up lacking.  In this case,  should trump 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:RS)