Deletion of Artificial intelligence in Wikimedia projects

Comment: I started this article. From , "A topic is presumed to merit an article if ... It meets ... the general notability guideline". This topic meets the  by itself being the subject of multiple |reliable sources. "Too narrow" and "can be covered elsewhere" are not established wiki community justifications for deletion. If this content were merged into an existing Wikipedia article then it would be shortened as being , and then when shortened that would trigger the cyclical justification of splitting it into its own article again. There is too much content here and too many sources cited to merge this content anywhere else. The CHIMERA issue is an editorial challenge which anyone could raise on the talk page at Talk:Artificial intelligence in Wikimedia projects with other issues and I would talk it through there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:UNDUE)