Deletion of Justice Democrats

Comment: This was started awfully early, and the editors didn't know how we define notability, but in addition to the ''Washington Post'' and ''Wired (magazine)|Wired'' sources—both of which are |reliable, especially the first, but neither of which was properly identified, so they were lost in the pool of primary sources (two sets of references to the platform) and dubious sources that I have kept because they reference the full list of founding names mentioned in the article, and who knows, some of those without articles may someday become notable—I found an article on the Univision site. That makes 3 reliable news sources, two indisputably major, so although the ''New York Times'' article that comes up on search didn't actually cover this group when I checked last night, I believe it now meets . I have accordingly rewritten it to tighten it up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes under both  and  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: as  and as ''waaaaay'' .  Yes WaPo and Wired ran articles when it launched.  But let's wait until it has done more than launch.  No prejudice against re-creation in 6 months or so if coverage at that point warrants
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:TOOSOON)