Deletion of Yeovil True

Comment: Coverage in at least three reliable sources (two already in the article plus http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2004/feb/28/sport.comment6 this) and a chart appearance seems to be enough for not only  but  as well. I can understand the nomination, as none of the sources were cited when the article was nominated, but it looks like a keep |now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG||WP:GNG||WP:HEY)

Comment: or '''merge'''.  also says "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." I'm sure sure this can be expanded beyond a stub, so I'd keep the merge option open. But as it charted (just), it's definitely not something for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)