Deletion of Shuchi Agrawal

Comment: all the sources are primary ({{yo|Domasai}}, this is covered in  - bottom line is, Wikipedia is not interested in what anybody has written about themselves, but what independent sources have written about them) with the possible exception of the sulekha.com interview. Interviews are however not considered a sufficient sign of notability, especially not in a relatively obscure publication. And no amount of cleanup of an article can create notability for its subject. Please note that "notability" is used in a very specific and peculiar sense on Wikipedia, and has nothing to do with "worthiness" or "goodness
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: Lack of any  on the subject.The frequent visits of sockpuppets,return of an editor after a 1-year sabbatical to post a rubbish! vote--this smells fishy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Non-notable personality; only a limited number of mentions in |the sources, but these are of a passing nature and lack the  and  required of them. For example- https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Shuchi+Agrawal&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=AI3eWP4E6sSABsKEkJAI#q=Shuchi+Agrawal&tbm=nws&* .  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE)