Deletion of List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors

Comment: Lists are obviously encyclopedic and of navigational value. Criteria for inclusion is very simple: iff there is a |RS that clearly states the film/song/book/whatever, and there are no sources for the contrary, then include the film/song/book/whatever. If there are pro and against sources, it can be included as "disputed" in a separate section. Else, don't include.  I don't see the problem. Scott MacDoc asks: ''So we are deciding that film x is about subject y, on the basis that some reviewer discussed the two things.''. My answer is: yes. (A more articulate answer would take into account the issue of academic consensus, but it's clear anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: If "some reviewer" says that "Peter Pan is about runaway children being buggered by pirates," do you suppose the normal editing process, and  could keep that statement out of Peter Pan, since its inclusion would place undue weight on the opinion of a nutjob who somehow got published somewhere? Mightn't we also question whether it was published in a reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: and .  Gawd, this is fucking ridiculous already.  This type of original research is not acceptable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)