Deletion of R v. Elliott

Comment: per Ivanvector's argument.  It certainly has the potential to be notable, but unless and until it rises to that threshold, I don't think it deserves an article.  Slightly contra Rhoark, while I agree that a verdict of guilty would almost certainly be a notable precedent, a verdict of not guilty would likely not set any sort of precedent (not guilty here would not be a total repudiation of the idea of harassment via twitter).  Basically, why rush it?  As we all know Wikipedia is |NOTNEWS.  Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Note that the guidelines cited to justify deletion are for biographical articles. This article is not a biography, but a legal case and parallel trial, as pointed out by Rhoark. As such, the nomination doesn't include an assertion of any violation of the |criteria for deletion and I don't see one on my own accord
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: this is being described in reliable sources as a precedent-setting case and is notable as its the first known harassment case in Canada based entirely on tweets. You have someone banned entirely from the internet for years before being found guilty (and not on any cybercrime/terrorism charges), both Twitter and the police have claimed there was nothing threatening and allegations of corruption. There's plenty notable about this case and there's several reliable sources in the article, if anything is a  it would seem to be this delete request
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: given broad neutral coverage of the verdict (I actually didn't know it was due today). , but all sources agree that the verdict is precedent-setting so I expect there to be lasting coverage of it, and there's no point deleting the article just to recreate it later. The other issues I mentioned can be solved with editing, so deletion seems to be off the table. Pinging {{ul|Nothing-Significant-to-Report}} {{ul|Dumuzid}} {{ul|99.235.212.48}} (the other delete !voters) to see if you agree with this assessment, then we can close this discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)