Deletion of Delta 8 (brand)

Comment: I rejected this one at AFC. It's a tricky one to verify and do  on because Delta-8 is both a chemical (of which there is sigcov) and a brand (of which there does not appear to be sigcov). This particular article is just about the brand. The three sources in the article I evaluate as follows: #1 is an interview so not '''independent'''. #2 I didn't evaluate yet, but am willing to evaluate if somebody quotes the line where Delta 8 the brand is mentioned. #3 does not appear to mention delta 8, therefore not '''significant coverage'''. The two sources in the comment above I evaluate as follows: #1 The NYT article doesn't mention the brand at all, only the chemical, so no '''significant coverage''' of the brand. #2 The New York Post is not a '''reliable''' source, per . Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:RSPSOURCES||WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: completely , but has received recent coverage in the https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/27/health/marijuana-hemp-delta-8-thc.html NYT and https://nypost.com/2021/03/05/delta-8-thc-is-legalbut-is-it-safe/ NYP
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)