Deletion of Westfield Bondi Junction

Comment: I find it troublesome that multiple users are expressing frustration about Elonka's nomination, insisting on the notability of the mall, and have yet to add any assertion of notability to the article. Rebecca, in particular, would do well to actually spend time ''working on the article'' and cease making |bad faith assumptions and calling for sanctions against Elonka. As of this post, there aren't even any sourceless notability assertions, much less one with a reference attached to it. Thus, the article still should be speedy deleted per CSD A7
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:FAITH)

Comment: according to The Age this is Westfield's most financially successful shopping centre http://www.theage.com.au/news/Business/Well-deliver-says-Westfield/2005/05/10/1115584958215.html. Come on guys, this is getting tiresome: there ''is'' no rule or policy about large shopping centres/malls not being notable - just  which says that their notability is disputed. There is clear support in WikiProject Australia to keep such articles, and I wish people would use cleanup tags ''or actually discuss the matter'' with users who would have a better idea of notability rather than swatting every questionable article they see with deletion tags
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:AFDP)