Deletion of List of Forgotten Realms deities

Comment: As far as I can tell from the references, no secondary sources exist (I might be wrong, if I am @ me and I'll take a look). I have no idea how this passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per nom and TTN. Typical  comments with absolutely no supporting evidence that it is a notable list. It's just pure  and the majority of the links are either to other lists or fancruft articles. I honestly do not see any content that can be merged here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: List of trivia is not encyclopedic. We have outsourced this stuff to wikias and such. This is already much better covered in https://forgottenrealms.fandom.com/wiki/Deity . Having such lists on Wikipedia is a disservice to the leader. I don't see arguments here that explain how such a list passes  (but I am open to consider them, ping me if you want me to review any new arguments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: While there is currently the start of an effort to restructure D&D articles, this really has no place on Wikipedia currently. These are simply |plot elements without any non-primary context and can constitute |game guide information under a certain light. They really provide no greater context to the topic. They simply exist here as part of this 2006 Wikipedia holdover. If notability for the grouping can be established, it severely should be culled similarly to the monster lists. If there are notable articles under this structure, I'd say they definitely number less than five, so a list even for those would be unneeded
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:GAMEGUIDE)