Deletion of Red cunt hair (2nd nomination)

Comment: on many users here: Like TomCat4680 mentioned many users here think this encyclopedia should be "censored," however |Wikipedia is not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: I'll have to admit, the reason for nomination, "Per |NOTDIC", was hilarious without intending to be
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)

Comment: This is already more than a , and has the potential to be expanded more, especially if moved to Hair (unit of measurement) as I suggested in the previous AFD.  In fact the move and expansion of the article to include all uses of "hair" as a unit of measurement is on my todo list, and I just haven't gotten around to it yet. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: appears to meet the requirements of  and clearly meets WP:N.  Also I dislike seeing an AfD come back so quickly after the last one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NNN)

Comment: I think the page move is a good idea as it would alter the focus of the article; many hairs are used as approximate measurements worldwide and this one is no more notable than the others. However page moves are not an Afd issue, they are normal editing practice. This Afd should now be closed, and the editors have at it on the talk page. Completely agree with Mandsford about |NOTDIC
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)