Deletion of Sandy Mitchell

Comment: The BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5078118.stm, the Daily Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/05/15/nmitch15.xml, the Scotsman http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=852&id=988562003 and the Guardian  http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,11538,1480369,00.html certainly think he's notable enough for articles on him.  He was interviewed on 'Hardtalk' on the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/11_november/17/hardtalk_mitchellsandy.shtml as well as this BBC press release shows.  He also wrote a book about his experiences http://www.amazon.co.uk/Saudi-Babylon-Torture-Corruption-Cover-up/dp/1840189614/ref=sr_1_12/203-8620412-6621523?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1188906391&sr=1-12    This is an article from the New Statesman http://www.newstatesman.com/200701150015.  This http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/18/AR2005051802089_pf.html article is from the Washington Post.  These articles concentrate on Sandy Mitchell's story or interview him personally.  This is not .  He clearly is the subject of multiple independent reliable sources.  This one is from CBS http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/06/60minutes/main615986.shtml and there are many others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)