Deletion of Daniel Lutz

Comment: Being leader of a minor political party without legislative representation is not an automatic inclusion freebie, and neither is being that party's gubernatorial candidate — the notability test for politicians is ''holding'' a notable political office, not just running for one. And of the nine footnotes here, six are |primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as his own party's self-published content about itself and raw tables of election results from the state elections agency — and of the three that are actually media, two are the purely routine "candidate questionnaire on the issues" that ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''always'' gets, thus not constituting evidence that his candidacy is special, and the third is not about him at all, but just offers a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article whose primary subject is somebody else. This is not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: none of the coverage in the article qualifies, I can't find any qualifying coverage per , and none of his positions pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)