Deletion of Stendhal (computer game)

Comment: Agreement with poster and Odie5533. The article certainly shouldn't be marked for speedy delete since it meets the A7 requirement of "existence, not notability", but to keep the article we do still need referenced sources to back that up. Ironically, one of the links listed on the page is "Wiki" and leading to quite literally an off-site Wiki-style information database for the game. I have no idea what category or tag you would give something like that, but simple reasoning would make one wonder why something would need a Wikipedia article if one of its external links is "Wiki". Alternate dimensions? Though the article is informational and doesn't give a self-promotional vibe, that link is highly suspicious as ; This article would be little more than a portal to suggest people go to the "real Wiki" for the game.  is what I see the list of concerns adding up to be. Even past that, the resources and link are self-promotional or irrelevant. Normally, articles that have existed this long don't reach AfD discussions, but it has apparently been hiding under the radar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: I can't find |significant coverage for this video game
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)