Deletion of Adrian Simpson (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm not even convinced he's dead, I've not been able to find any evidence of that online.  As pointed out below, the facts just do not add up with this article, and the whole thing smells fishy.  However, even if we take it at face value,  would seem to apply, impersonating a zookeeper is hardly criminal mastermind material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Impersonating a scientist does not make one a scientist, and lying about a scientific accomplishment does not make one notable for that accomplishment, as the article claimed (with no sources for it).  Also, how did he impersonate a scientist for "years" when he was only 19 at the time of his death?  He's a nn con artist who got a day of news coverage, and therefore fails every possible criterion of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: people can be notable as impostors but there is too little evidence of past coverage to demonstrate the notability of this one. In terms of the coverage from the last few days it also seems to be limited, and for the moment #NEWS certainly still applies. If it turns out that there is substantial coverage beyond around the time of his death, the article might deserve to be recreated then. I'd want to see if the story is forgotten about 6 months from now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)