Deletion of Landis W. Garrison

Comment: fails  and , completely non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly does not meet , as for  he got the coverage because he was a soldier so he should be judged by .  You also have to consider  shooting your self while deployed, is a minor event. While the event is verifiable, it is not notable nor is the subject. "We were in our living quarters, when Garrison, just playing around, inadvertently shot himself." https://taskandpurpose.com/community/the-tragic-truth-of-accidental-deaths-in-combat-zones/ source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: per my response to the above nearly-identical delete !votes on every one of these nominations.  is a guideline, and  is an essay. I count six reliable third-party sources; is there some reason these ''don't'' satisfy  and imply 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: May I presume your argument for deletion that is actually based on policies/guidelines is "fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)