Deletion of Auli'i Cravalho (2nd nomination)

Comment: Clearly notable per , and I believe she meets point 3 in . Easy keep.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: What EmWinn said-it hasn't been that long since I first nominated this article for deletion, I'm afraid we will simply have a repeat of the first nomination, and to be honest I don't have very much new to bring to the table. Most of the arguments against deletion in the first nomination didn't seem to be rooted in any policy, but there must have been some other strength to them since it was decided consensus was to keep the article. Also, I'm not so sure Cravalho still fails  at this point given the significance of the role
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: I see multiple reasons, including . In addition, I'd like to comment that a '''very recent''' previous AfD was filed and while I know we don't have double jeopardy, this was literally discussed four weeks ago and the summary was "keep". —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: As discussed in the previous AfD nomination, an actor can meet  if they have a  a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. While it is hard to say whether Auli'i's fan base in the long term will be large, the success so far of the film in which she plays the protagonist, combined with the fact her page has received 247,632 pageviews in the 13 days since the film premiered in the USA and Canada, suggests there is a large following of her/significant interest in her from people who have heard or seen about the film
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)