Deletion of Adam O. Brown

Comment: Per nom and Qwfp. Article created way too early; if not speedy should go via snowball delete. Passes neither  nor 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: The sort of listing of minutiae here is what we get when there isn't enough of significance to say about the subject. I don't tend to approve of speedy deletion of articles on academics – usually they've done enough in a Ph.D. to make some sort of claim of significance, though not usually one that will hold up in an AfD. In this case he's one of the co-authors of a paper that comes up second in Google scholar when one searches for cloudberry pollination, so I guess he's one of the experts in that highly specialized subject. It's far from enough for  #1, though, and all the rest of the fluff in the article only makes it look worse
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Another classic red-flag here is listing submitted manuscripts as "publications". This sort of information is not even publicly-available, so it probably violates . Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Doesn't meet  or otability (people). Maybe even '''speedy delete''' per #A7 as an article about a real person that doesn't indicate why its subject is important or significant. (The most significant thing claimed seems to be that he was captain of a fairly successful university fencing team, a claim which doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:N||WP:CSD||WP:ATHLETE)