Deletion of Shree Harikul Model Higher Secondary School (2nd nomination)

Comment: obviously.A classic example of the very long-standing consensus to keep such articles as documented at  and evidenced by thousands of AfD closures. Already kept at a recent  AfD where {{U|DGG}} provided the correct argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: fails . The previous discussion was closed with reference to  (with the closer somewhat bizarrely suggesting that that essay overrode the need for sources), but common outcomes are not policy, so I don't see why we shouldn't assess the article against notability requirements, which are policy. Yes, articles on secondary schools are usually kept, but this one strikes me as one that shouldn't be, due to a lack of sources to base article content on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: The existing source in the article does verify the school's existence, and I would judge it to be a reliable source (gov.np domain). It doesn't verify any of the facts such as year of founding etc, but per  (and as discussed above) the material point when it comes to keeping the article is its existence shown in a reliable source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)