Deletion of Daniel Fuller

Comment: The sources added by Jkaharper are quite valuable; here's https://books.google.com/books?id=uufvZyG-hjEC&pg=PA251#v=onepage&q&f=false another one. He has also written numerous books, and those books have been widely cited and reviewed. At the end of the day, he seems to have "had a significant impact in his scholarly discipline, broadly construed", meaning he meets  crit. #1, and one could argue that he also meets the GNG and/or  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: easily passes  #1. I have added more sources to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)