Deletion of Dan Schlund (3rd nomination)

Comment: per . No prejudice against redirecting/merging to jet pack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: does not meet , no independent notability and in addition, as nom states, BLP1E applies. It's mainly an ad for the "rocketman", to get to parades etc. At most, this could be a redirect to Jet pack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Meets  as outlined in the General notability guidelines. Notability is supported by multiple independent sources, and specifically in The Oklahoman, , the Sheena Coffey, and the Los Angeles Daily News articles that are cited in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I have carefully reviewed this many times, and he is not notable, pure vanity,  as far as i'm concerned, , at best a stunt man. All the articles refer to him as a stuntman, or as a pure case of novelty...they do not indicate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:1E)

Comment: A disruptive repeat nomination per our |deletion policy.  The topic seems to have adequate notability and claims of  are obviously inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Meets  as "the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject".  couldn't be clearer about not using the word "vanity" as it is considered "accusatory and discouraging" as well as "not helpful, nor reason to delete an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COI)

Comment: completely fails  (including  and , depending on where you stick him) and . He does not have any real significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, including as noted above in the evaluation of those found. Only a few minor mentions in a few reliable sources. Bulk of the article comes from his own site (not third party) and IMDB (not . He has also not "made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment", no evidence of a large fan base (as in evidenced by those pesky reliable sources, etc etc. Can't believe this actually survived the previous AfDs. I see no valid reason to redirect this to jetpack either. He neither invented it nor is a significant person in relation to it. It just, apparently, uses it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:ATH||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: per , , and DG's analysis of sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:SPAM)