Deletion of Cybersecurity Strategy

Comment: There are several fundamental problems with this article, each of which is sufficient grounds for deletion:  (1) To quote the deletion rationale for a previous version of this article, "This is a single analysis of cybersecurity, written as though there were 'one' strategy and 'one' framework for cybersecurity, which isn't by any means the case."//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Cybersecurity+strategy By way of comparison, the Military strategy and Business strategy articles illustrate how the broad notion of ''strategy'' applicable to a particular field should be covered in an encyclopedic manner: Those articles (a) cite sources that discuss the field broadly, (b) discuss a variety of strategies that are individually notable in terms of , and (c) cite sources that compare and contrast those strategies. This article describes "''The'' Cyber Security Strategy" as the be-all and end-all of strategic thinking in the field, which is neither true nor supportable by any reliable sources.  (2) "The" strategy is defined in terms of some "recent standard Capability Maturity Model Cybersecurity", which is evidently |''so'' recent that it has yet to be promulgated as a standard anywhere, and in terms of "The CS5L, Cybersecurity 5 Layout model" (Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model |CS5L CMM) which was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybersecurity strategy 5 Layout Capability Maturity Model |found not notable (both articles by the same contributor). As such this is essentially an essay of |original research.  (3) Although not overtly promotional in tone, there appears to be a |conflict of interest in using Wikipedia to promulgate ones own ideas, as presented in a http://cs5lcmm.blogspot.com/2015/05/cybersecurity-strategy-5-layout.html blog post, or promoting http://www.sstech.us/Services/Cybersecurity the strategy and http://www.sstech.us/Content/CyberSecurity.pdf framework of one's http://www.sstech.us/ own company.  In sum, as noted by Blue Rasberry in the above linked AfD, there appears to be a misunderstanding of what is meant by ''Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OR||WP:COI)