Deletion of Hope May

Comment: per prod - fails both  and  inclusion guidelines.  Also, notability is not inherited, so her spouse being notable does not cause her to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: There is nothing in the article itself, in the discussion above or in the results of my own research to indicate that the subject even approaches the level of notability described by  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: or redirect to her husband. Many of the keep comments above seem to be of the form "she has tenure, therefore we should have an article on her". That's far below the standard required by . We still have no evidence (e.g. in the form of high citation counts) that her publications have made much of an impact, the teaching award is also not "highly prestigious" and "at a national or international level" as  #2 requires, and I don't see a lot of independent press coverage of her which might satisfy  in place of . In the absense of |verifiable evidence that she's notable, I think we should delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:V)