Deletion of Tanhouse lane railway station

Comment: we do indeed have :Category:Disused railway stations in the United Kingdom|thousands of such articles; but I shouldn't use  as an argument. Nevertheless, three of us (Thryduulf; myself; and Lamberhurst) have {{diff|Tanhouse Lane railway station|551615276|551590793|added quite a bit}} to this since it was AFDd (and I've not finished yet), and in the space of a few hours it's been put into somewhat better shape than some (much older) articles about stations on the same line (e.g. {{stnlnk|Halewood}}, {{stnlnk|Padgate}} or {{stnlnk|Chassen Road
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: none of the nominator's arguments are in any way criterion for deletion. Articles are not required to be part of WikiProjects; lacking references is |fixable, as is poor formatting and grammar, and |AfD is not for cleanup; being a stub is |not a reason for deletion, as is claiming it |seems |insignificant; being an orphan is also not a reason for deletion. If the nominator can provide a |policy-based reason for deletion, the article can be speedily renominated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:TOOLITTLE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:JNN||WP:DELPOL)

Comment: trout nominator for not providing a single reason for deletion, and making a solely  nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)