Deletion of 2019 Grays incident

Comment: I am confused on why you are citing  as the very section says "'''Just wait and see.''' Remember Wikipedia:There is no deadline|there is no deadline, and |consensus can change later on. Editors writing today do not have a historical perspective on today's events, and |should not pretend to have a crystal ball. This is especially true during a news spike, when there is mass interest to create and update articles on a current event, regardless of whether it may be historically significant later on. Also, editors updating an article affected by a current event may not necessarily be the same ones participating months (or even years) later in the clean-up and maintenance of the page. Above all else, editors should avoid getting into Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit wars or contentious deletion discussions when trying to deal with recentism." As in this is meant to be used for articles that are slanted towards recent events later down the line. As for , a large death count has led to broad coverage. I would wait at least a week before revisiting deletion here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:CCC||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWS)