Deletion of Nail H. Ibragimov

Comment: passes rof#C1. Nominators should do more than a "quick google search
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Work has had influence in multiple fields: pure mathematics, mathematical physics, mathematical finance.  Numerous published works with triple-digit, even quadruple-digit citation counts.  Clearly meets requirements of #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Very highly cited works in analysis. Definitely passes #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per #C1 (massive citation counts on Google scholar, especially as some of the heavily cited works are in pure mathematics, usually a very low citation field) and  (17 books with 15 published reviews just counting the ones on MathSciNet; probably others available elsewhere as well). As for GNG, (1) it's not the relevant notability guideline here, and (2) my strong suspicion is that the opinions above based on "a quick Google search" did not bother searching the Cyrillic version of his name, Ибрагимов, Наиль Хайруллович, because if they did they would have likely found many more sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The nominator first tried to get this speedy deleted, then prodded, before taking it to AfD, starting less than 20 minutes after the article was created. The deprod edit summary already clearly pointed to the subject's citation record, and to #C1, something the nominator seems to have ignored or not understood in making the AfD nomination. So a trout may be in order as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)