Deletion of HappyBird

Comment: Copyright infringement is not handled through AfD as a rule, nor do I see any copyright infringement here. What text is being improperly copied and where? Nor do I see any "false claims". If there is an error in the name of the company, that should be corrected. Is "Angel" simply short for "Digital Angel" or is it an error or are the two related in some way? we should find out if possible, but none of those are reasons for deletion. The article as it stands is stating apparent facts, not making promotional claims. It may be that those facts do not have sufficient relaible sources supporting them, in which case we should correct that if possible, and if that is not possible, THEN and only then would deletion be appropriate. {{U|Ireneshih}}, have you gone through the steps at  prior to the nom
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: 2 of 3 references are press releases and the other one may be as well.  Fails to come close to demonstrating WP:Notability.  Even if notable, promotional tone suggest  may be best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:STARTOVER)

Comment: article reads like advertising copy, and the company doesn't have the substantial third-party coverage I'd expect from a firm that met 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)