Deletion of Rose Van Thyn

Comment: The significant coverage in the regional Shreveport papers now cited in the article and which are independent of the subject satisfies . Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: An oral history interview with Van Thyn is on file at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, she was an Attaway fellow, was awarded an honorary degree, an annual Rose and Louis Van Thyn Holocaust Lecture Series is held at Centenary College, and she was given a National Conference of Community and Justice award. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Unfortunately, notability has not been demonstrated. There is a concerted lack of |persistent |depth of coverage in independent, third-party |reliable sources to satisfy the requirements of . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DEPTH||WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Doesn't pass  because she doesn't have "significant coverage in reliable '''sources'''" (plural). If someone can find significant coverage in a publication other than the ''Shreveport Times'' I will re-consider my !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I don't have the time to search here like I would prefer for a biography, so refraining from actually !voting, but the article as currently stands is nowhere near meeting the GNG: the vast majority of the sourcing is from ''one publication'', which only counts as one source per , the guideline people always forget the GNG is contained as but one part of. Add on top of that we have it being a local paper? The oral history certainly doesn't count either: it's a primary source. Like local press, getting into an oral history library is very easy to do. There might be external sourcing that isn't in there, but what we have currently have is an obit for what seems to be a wonderful woman
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Clearly does meet  and has sourcing beyond just one newspaper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic is notable per the .  A bias against regional sources is not policy and it should not be because it would tend to cause a metropolitian bias.  Our actual policies such as , ,  and  all indicate that we should keep this article.  If it were to be "deleted" what this would actually mean is that the page would be put on the back shelves of wikipedia, where only administrators could read it.  It would make no sense for this subject to be blacklisted so that the world could not have free access to this material which was voluntarily contributed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:NOTCENSOR||WP:PRESERVE||WP:IAR)