Deletion of Emma Gonzalez

Comment: change from "merge") -- at this point, the subject meets  of sorts: 2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. With 450K Twitter followers, she has only 100K less than NRA and appears to be on track to surpass it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: or '''merge''' as above. ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:RECENTISM||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: This seems like a big  issue and feels like it's pushing too hard in one direction. While I applaud her efforts, I don't think merging would be beneficial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per . If her attention fades, possibly merge with Never Again MSD... but I really think keep right now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: Normally I would delete it per BLP1E, and merge it into Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. However, despite the massive coverage, editors at the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting have deleted most of the references to Gonzalez, and don't even quote her speech. (In violation of , IMO.) So I would keep the Gonzalez page until her treatment at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting is expanded to fairly represent its prominence in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT||WP:RS)

Comment: to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting Never Again MSD because ; plus insuffiient SIGCIV of her as an individual activist to support independent notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: meets  per . González's actions in the last week and the resulting publicity and reporting support, in my opinion, that this is not . I would also support moving page to '''Emma González'''. Many sources are now including her surname with an accent and she uses it herself on her https://twitter.com/Emma4Change twitter account
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:HEY||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting or (if it survives its own AfD) Never Again MSD. /, should not be standalone until she does something else notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: It is too early to say if Criterion 3 of  is met. It's also hard to make the  argument. Subject of the article is notable, event she is associated with is notable. If in six months or a year she is no longer notable or meets all three criteria of , then we can '''merge''' to Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. There is no cause to delete this article at this time. And remember that all three criteria of  must be met in order to qualify the article for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Non-notable individual. If the individual still is involved significantly on a national scale in a year with gun control, certainly we should reconsider. rystalBall prohibits us from looking into the future to determine future notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)