Deletion of Ben Burch (3rd nomination)

Comment: fails , , and . Very heavily vandalized
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:BIO)

Comment: this as a gross violation of ,  and . This could be deleted under speedy since no claim to fame is made in the article. I actually intended to nominate this article myself.  "Ben Burch" as an article has no verifiable secondary claims and, in-fact, none where "Ben Burch" is the subject likely exist. His website might be slightly notable, but not Ben. In addition this article has been flame-bait  since the moment of it's conception.  ''Before you voice your opinion here, please take a look at the above policies and make your judgement with it in mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:BIO)

Comment: A7, failing that '''delete''' per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as subject does not meet  criteria with no precedent towards allowing subject nominated AfD to go forward.  This is just one case where the subject happens to be correct; he doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)