Deletion of Guo Xiaojun

Comment: Not a |BLP1E issue. He has |significant coverage outside of his arrest sufficient to pass wp:GNG|the notability threshold. For example, http://www.secretchina.com/news/10/07/27/360735.html?%E4%B8%8A%E6%B5%B7%E4%BA%A4%E5%A4%A7%E6%A0%A1%E5%8F%8B%E5%91%BC%E5%90%81%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E5%81%9C%E6%AD%A2%E8%BF%AB%E5%AE%B3%E9%83%AD%E5%B0%8F%E5%86%9B%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F this article  relates to students from Shanghai Jiao Tong University protesting about his persecution by the Chinese government. There is a lot more coverage out there in Chinese sources - perfectly valid in Wikipedia terms to avoid |systematic bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CSB)

Comment: Firstly, he is not a professor but a lecturer, thus fails . Indeed, he is a prisoner of conscience, but unlike other prisoners of conscience in China, he hasn't done anything remarkable. He was arrested only because he was a practitioner of Falun Gong. In my own view, being the practitioner of Falun Gong may not be regarded as something unusual. Actually thousands of Falun Gong practitioners are arrested in China every year, he is just one of them. What makes he distinguish from these thousands of victims is the media coverage of his case. A person who is |only famous as the victim of a case may not meet . If the case itself is notable enough (passes ), we should create a new article about the case, then '''redirect''' this BIO to the new article. If not, '''delete'''. {{ping|TheBlueCanoe}} --Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO||WP:EVENT)

Comment: Sufficient coverage to meet the notability guideline and with the two arrests I do not see this as a  issue per TheBlueCanoe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)