Deletion of Hugo Schwyzer (2nd nomination)

Comment: as lacking in depth coverage in '''reliable sources''' as required by the . If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:WELLKNOWN|Well sourced stuff has to stay, even if the subject could dislike it, that's part of . He is notable, there is no question around it: the amount of coverage along the years for multiple events is big enough. It's useless, and a bit ridicolous, to shut up our mouth when all newspapers scream around. Also, while for sure some trimming was in order: but the axe of
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)