Deletion of Chris Kacher (2nd nomination)

Comment: The Seaborgium bit is interesting but he was a grad student on the team. It's not a claim to encyclopedic notability in itself. He released some piano compositions, which have been viewed quite a lot on YouTube but haven't been critically reviewed or charted (I read that a remix got airplay in South Africa, but couldn't verify anything towards ). On the finance side, his main arena, there's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg_v3WjArMA a CNBC appearance but I couldn't find solid independent coverage of him as a subject, book review notwithstanding. In a way that's surprising, but there it is. I also don't see that he originated a significant concept, as one struck vote claims. As I read it, the book in question discussed applying ''O'Neil's'' principles, and the 120 year chart says "stock markets move with the news". I agree that this doesn't warrant an article. I've not factored in the pay involved in the editing (and of course it's important that disclosure is encouraged
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: for lack of independent sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. A non-notable individual and likely a paid placement. Sources are passing mentions and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)