Deletion of Sherlock Bones, Tracer of Missing Pets

Comment: no evidence of significant coverage by |reliable sources as required by the |general notability criteria or anything to |verify that the book meets any of the specific criteria set out in Wikipedia:Notability (books). The book mentioned is over 1000 pages long and a new edition came out every year it was published, without evidence of what it contains, a review, a plot summary or a simple listing the article cannot be expanded beyond a simple #PLOT|plot summary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN||WP:V||WP:NOT)

Comment: There are two LA Times articles about the book (one during it's writing and one after, I believe), but they're behind a paywall so I can't tell for sure if they meet the "non-trivial" requirement of . It appears he's local to that area and there's no review by any other major source, so I'm calling it a lack of significant coverage per Joe Chill
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)