Deletion of (20692) 1999 VX73

Comment: per , an established guideline that the keep arguments above seem to be ignoring without explaining why
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: there are over 1300 near earth asteroids (this one is not), and a very large multiple of non-near earth (this is one) - here's a list of 300,000: http://www.minorplanetcenter.net/iau/lists/NumberedMPs020001.html. My criteria is  - I could find no significant independent coverage from secondary sources, just database rows. How can 300,000 minor planets be notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  (no merge is necessary since all the information is in the target article already). Consensus, as expressed in that guideline, is that merely existing as an astronomical object is not sufficient to confer notability. An article on this asteroid could not possibly contain any more information other than measurements of physical characteristics (orbital parameters, mass, albedo etc). In the unlikely event that the asteroid is studied in greater detail by scientists then a separate article can be created, but until then the topic should be handled as part of a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)