Deletion of Dale Hample

Comment: no sources to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I temporarily http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dale_Hample&diff=164031119&oldid=164030807 removed a laundry-list of publications from this article last week, as it was dominating the article to such an extent that it was becoming an indiscriminate collection of information; if anyone thinks it should be restored, by all means do so. I am deliberately not commenting on whether this should be kept or deleted as, while he certainly seems notable within his field, I'm not able to judge whether the field is so specialised that notability within it is not sufficient. Despite bordering on a breach of |AGF, I think it's necessary to point out that the nominator has a lengthy history of apparent bad-faith AfD nominations of debating-related material, which has been raised at AN/I in the past - see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=159336677#User:JJJ999,  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/World_Public_Speaking_Championship&curid=13317703&diff=159322414&oldid=159311777,  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/World_Public_Speaking_Championship&diff=159302217&oldid=159300973, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RD_Reynolds_%282nd_nomination%29&diff=159260675&oldid=159227850 for example
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: Not my area, but an Editor-in-chief of one journal who is on the ed board of ten more seems to meet  criteria 1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per DGG, it is my opinion that this person does meet  guideline. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)