Deletion of Battle of the Damned (2nd nomination)

Comment: Concerns of last AFD are addressed in that the film has http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2210463/releaseinfo finally been released and  and  are soundly met for this film topic. Multiple available sources toward production, filming, and release were ridiculously easy to find. Anyone else ever read ?  Topic notability is determined by sources being available,http://www.joblo.com/horror-movies/news/dolph-lundgren-fights-zombies-in-new-battle-of-the-damned-stillshttp://www.screendaily.com/festivals/cannes/anchor-bay-enters-lundgrens-battle/5056311.articlehttp://influxmagazine.com/battle-of-the-damned/http://moviemavericks.com/2013/07/battle-of-the-damned-2013-review/http://www.coolreviewsrule.com/2013/08/battle-of-damned-movie-review.htmlhttp://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3233515/dolph-lundgren-vs-zombies-in-anchor-bays-battle-of-the-damned/http://www.beyondhollywood.com/dolph-lundgren-and-some-robots-will-partake-in-the-battle-of-the-damned/http://badassdigest.com/2013/10/09/awesome-poster-for-dolph-lundgrens-battle-of-the-damned/http://www.jtonzelli.com/2013/08/review-battle-of-damned.htmlhttp://www.manlymovie.net/2013/08/review-battle-of-damned-2013.htmlhttp://www.the-other-view.com/battle-damned.htmlhttp://bloody-disgusting.com/news/3248902/trailer-stills-for-dolph-lundgren-vs-zombies-horror-battle-of-the-damned/ '''not''' by their use or not within an article. THAT and any sense or a promotional tone are issues best addressed through regular editing, not deletion.  And
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:NRVE)