Deletion of List of unusual personal names (3rd nomination)

Comment: If this wasn't sourced I'd have voted to delete, but as it is, it seems OK with sourcing, although there needs to be either culling of unsourced names (per ) or additional sources added for those that don't have any. The title of the article and the use of the word "unusual" needs a bit of examination as that comes off a bit OR'y. Maybe something like List of Notable People with Unconventional Personal Names or something like that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: We don't need "universal agreement" on a topic in order to document it, otherwise we couldn't have articles on topics like Beauty, Terrorism, Pornography, or Christianity. NPOV only requires that we fairly document any controversy where it exists in reliable sources. However, I doubt there is much "controversy" surrounding what names are "unusual", that is, you will find few, if any, reliable sources saying something like "Creedence Clearwater Couto is not an unusual name for a person." Sure, unusual is in the eye of the beholder, but if the beholder is a |reliable source, then we can document it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)