Deletion of Daniel Hardcastle (2nd nomination)

Comment: Nothing notable when conducting a  search. As pointed out, SNG's can be used to presume notability and create articles. That presumed notability can be rebutted. The evidence is what it is. Being a #1 best seller author, while significant, is not notable in an of itself according to the criteria. Creating a YouTube channel that has 2.5 million subscribers, while of import, does not equal notability as per the criteria. It must pass criteria laid out in . That is the only criteria relevant at AfD's. This does not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:N)

Comment: The subject of the article has received a significant amount of coverage.  Though not all of it is linked from the article, notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article per .  I think  also applies in this scenario, as even though(especially mainstream) media coverage has faded as buzz around the book did, that doesn't change the fact that it was at one point the best selling book in the UK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:NTEMP)