Deletion of Rick Strawn

Comment: The only current source for the article is a single article (the other source simply summarizes the first) talking about Strawn as an example of a subspecies of youth transport firm, so on that basis I don't think he's independently notable. Older versions are  problem-fests which seems to have been powered by fishing expeditions because the ''Legal Affairs'' article names him. Salting this might be a good idea
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This subject only begins to approach , and fails basic criteria of . Though there is substantial coverage, though ultimately by one reliable source, as pointed out by Mangoe. The summary of the Legal Affairs article in a second publication doesn't add much in the way of substantial coverage; it doesn't have anything that could support additional article content. Given the one (or 1.5 or 2) sources and the negative aspects of the coverage,  applies. It can't be said the subject is |well-known at all. Uzma and Mangoe have also both pointed out the negative content in coverage poses problems BLP-wise. I think that even if / were satisfied by additional reliable coverage, in this case, the BLP problems are reason enough to vote !delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:NPF||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)