Deletion of The Racket (book)

Comment: The nom disagrees with the criteria set out at , which state "A book is notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria: The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews." They have written at my talkpage "I've thought for years that a literal interpretation of NBOOK is too low a standard". However, disagreeing with an integral Wikipedia policy is not a reason for deletion. I think this is made pretty clear by the statement the NOM made "Despite the reviews, not an important book" - surely one of this more interesting deletion justifications. Basically, that translates to me as "Despite meeting , it's not a book I like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: The book meets .  The nominator, as a professional librarian (as stated on the nominator's user page), should be well aware of the OCLC https://www.oclc.org/partnerships/material/participants.en.html "Vendor record contribution program participants", where "The following material vendors load records into WorldCat through the vendor record contribution program."  Vendor contribution to the database makes the number of library holdings irrelevant, unreliable and minimal counts of library holdings (WorlCat) are not discussed in any policies or guidelines cited by the nominator.  In fact, I contend that Amazon's, "Editorial Reviews" section, is far more credible than a WorldCat count, where the publisher can simply flood the database with donated books. (What would you do with boxes of books that didn't sell
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)

Comment: As much as I dislike the author it does have two published reviews which meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)