Deletion of Hawthorne Plaza Shopping Center

Comment: None of the sources provides any evidence of mall meeting . It's all routine coverage or promo pieces. You could find articles like these for every single mall. These sources show that this was just an average mall; a number of people have looked and none have come up with a single source that shows this mall has historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. It was so completely average that even when some people tried to revive it, the plans failed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILD)

Comment: The sources that Calliopejen1 presented above show that there is pretty significant coverage for this topic. I disagree with the nominator that "If all readers see when they look at malls, is open, renovate, close, boring routine items, they will miss the truly interesting and noteworthy malls." Notability is not assessed in relation to other subjects, and openings, renovations, and closures are not necessarily "routine". These sources show that there's some pretty specific coverage of this mall in third-party reliable sources, which is enough to meet . Just because a mall is dead does not mean that it automatically becomes insignificant - see .{{pb}}Further, I'm not convinced that this automatically fails NBUILD. According to , "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, '''may''' be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they '''''require'' significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources''' to establish notability." The requirement is that such buildings need significant coverage by reliable third-party sources. Historical, social, economic, or architectural significance is an ancillary, and will be demonstrated by whether the topic meets the GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:NBUILD)