Deletion of Glen Frazer, California

Comment: Yet another erroneous GNIS designation. Post offices are not indicators of passing  because they are not legal recognition and in the context of a RR station a post office may be tied only to postal rail functions and not to a populated place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: The article does not meet ,  appears unpopulated. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/56783728/farewell-to-a-landmark/ describes it as a "depot" for the railway, which isn't a community, or even the kind of station where passengers can board. There are mentions in sources but they are all in the context of reports of routine railway operations. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dlIdIoZ51mYC&q=%22Glen+Frazer%22&dq=%22Glen+Frazer%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj_wdvIiprrAhVORRUIHZCUBmMQ6AEwBnoECAcQAg makes it clear that there was a ranch nearby, but a ranch doesn't equal a community. There's certainly no sign of a community at the claimed coordinates now.  only gives near-automatic notability to legally recognised populated places. Having a post office doesn't equate to legal recognition and there isn't any good evidence of a community here anyway. If it's not a legally recognised populated place then it has to pass the GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Nothing in the plain wording of  indicates a that GNIS listing and/or having had a post office confers notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)