Deletion of Rev. Dr. David Rolfe

Comment: Now that the source has been more clearly identified, it's clear that there was no source at all for the controversial material, and hence its removal was proper per . Agree the remaining material doesn't show notability. Accordingly, I've changed my vote (above) to regular delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This article contains personally damaging material, material that requres careful adherence to our sourcing policies per . The necessary sources have to be there or the material has to be removed. Currently there is only one source. The source is called an on-line source, but there is no link enabling one to see it and I can't locate it using Google. Moreover, I have no way of knowing if this is an independent source, and even if it is, ''multiple'' independent sources are required and this requirement ''has'' to be adhered to per  given the personally damaging nature of what is being claimed. Get rid of this thing immediately, and if sources are forthcoming, the issue can get addressed in deletion review. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP)

Comment: per nom. Fails notability and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Was |bold and removed all the problematic material, not too much of the article is left. If I am wrong I can always be reverted. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)