Deletion of Erik Rush (2nd nomination)

Comment: Subject is probably notable by non-Wikipedia definitions, but I can find no third-party reliable sources that treat the subject in a non-trivial way, and so it does not pass . Yes, there is buzz, and yes he's a "prolific" writer, but until subject is personally written about more extensively, the article cannot be appropriately sourced to satisfy Wikipedia guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I copy the argument from the previous AfD: "The guy certainly has a large buzz on the conversative blogosphere, although it seems that 99% of it is in response to his attacks on Barack Obama.  Certainly enough for the "cult following" criterion of ." Explosive political commentary is, after all, a form of entertainment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)