Deletion of Burnley 0–1 Lincoln City (2017)

Comment: it's too early to see if there is any lasting lasting notability per , same with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: The significant international coverage it received is evidence it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to a suitable section of Lincoln City F.C., or to a season article, if and when anyone writes one. There's been enough coverage of Lincoln's cup run as a whole to take it above the routine, meaning a season article would be notable (which at the fifth tier of English football, it normally wouldn't be). And that'd be the ideal place to cover the latest match. It's way too soon to tell whether this match will have significant enduring notability. The Hereford and Sutton matches have, I don't think the Luton one does.The C of E is mistaken that foreign sources aren't going to be interested in Millwall v Leicester: the New Zealand site that ran the Reuters report cited in the article also carried a Reuters report of pretty much the same size and (lack of) depth on the http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/world-game/89565337/pitch-invasion-sours-millwalls-shock-win-over-leicester Millwall-Leicester match. The media both domestic and foreign are bound to be interested news-wise in a non-league team beating a Premier League team and thereby reaching the quarter-final for the first time in modern times, but that's how news reporting works.  requires out-of-the-ordinary coverage, as the examples clearly illustrate: this match hasn't had it. cheers
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)