Deletion of Electoral history of Dennis Kucinich

Comment: as a valid . The electoral history of the subject is quite long and overwhelms the main article. I think pages of election results should be seen as similar to pages of award nominations (See List of awards and nominations received by Tom Hanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: Per Arms & Hearts. This article is clearly an appropriate 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: The relevant criterion for an article like this isn't notability but rather  and . That is to say, because Kucinich is notable, it's reasonable to have articles about other aspects of his life if discussion of those aspects would be too long to include in his article without it becoming too long. In this case the Dennis Kucinich article is just under 81kB and the electoral history article is just under 19kB, so if the electoral history were restored to the main article it would fall into 's category of "Probably should be divided", right on the cusp of "Almost certainly should be divided". That being said,  may still require that the electoral history article be cut down somewhat — whether a particular statistic is "pointless" or not is not for us to say, but we could certainly trim most or all of the results that aren't cited to a reliable source. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:SIZESPLIT||WP:SIZESPLIT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)