Deletion of The War on Freedom

Comment: per nom.  Violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: not notable enough.  is not yet agreed upon, only a proposal at this point.  I have weighed in on the proposed guideline Wikipedia_talk:Notability_%28books%29#Concerns|talk page with my concerns that it it too inclusionist.  The articles on both authors are only stubs.  I think mention of this book on the authors' pages suffices
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: I find this book in 221 United States libraries on Worldcathttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/59358754&tab=holdings&start_holding=221#tabs, it has three editorial reviews at amazon.comhttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/0930852400/ref=dp_proddesc_0/104-4629918-4931118?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books, 29 hits at Google Scholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22The+War+on+Freedom:+How+and+Why+America+was+Attacked%22&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=20&sa=N, three hits for a google news searchhttp://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&q=%22The+War+on+Freedom%3A+How+and+Why+America+was+Attacked%22+%22los+angeles+times%22&btnG=Search+News and six for a google book searchhttp://books.google.com/books?q=%22The+War+on+Freedom%3A+How+and+Why+America+was+Attacked%22+&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0. Here's a review in http://www.missoulanews.com/AE/News.asp?no=2858 the Missoula Independent. It was apparently one of a selection of books made available to the 9/11 Commissionhttp://www.archives.gov/research/alic/special-collections/9-11-commission.html. It also apparently won the ''Naples Prize'', Italy's highest literary prize, which I learned through this article from Vanity Fairhttp://vancouver.indymedia.org/?q=node/2106 and is mentioned in too many other online publications to begin to list. Thus, appears manifestly notable and meets multiple bases of inclusion listed at . I am personally repulsed by the 9/11 conspiracy nonsense but that's not a proper basis for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: I'm not too keen on the 9/11 conspiracy content but Fugh makes a strong argument that it indeed meets the  criteria which I helped shape
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment:  suggests that a minimum threshold for notability of a book is the appearance in about a dozen libraries.  This one is in 222.   also suggests that books by notable people are notable; Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed is.  I can see no policy-based reason not to keep this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: And many label me a deletionist! If any of you think  is too inclusionist, please drop by the talk page and make some suggestions. We have been struggling against a tide of inclusionists railing that the criteria are ''too stringent'' and suffer from a lack of feedback. Okay, back to the matter at hand. Discounting everything else I posted, the Vanity Fair article, while it is not a detailed treatment of the book itself, is a very reliable source indicating that the book won Italy's highest literary prize. Do you dispute the reliability of that fact? If not, isn't a book which wins a country's most prestigious literary prize notable on that basis alone? In any case, as for more reliable sources, how does England's http://browse.guardian.co.uk/search?search=%22Nafeez%20Mosaddeq%20Ahmed%22 Guardian Unlimited strike you. In that article they indicate that Gore Vidal's essay, ''Dreaming War'' is an overview of this book and quote him referring to it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: notable book that has been frequently mentioned and cited in other sources; certainly meets , and appears to have been nominated for AfD for pure POV-pushing reasons.  I have strong disagreements with the POV of this book, but it is clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)