Deletion of Nicolás Aguirre

Comment: Aguirre has now been shown to have numerous  articles in the Argentine media. Kudos to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The First League of Argentina is one of the strongest in South America, and I fail to see why an MVP there (and player for the national team as well) shouldn't be considered at least as notable as anyone who has played a single game in some of the league mentioned in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBASKETBALL)

Comment: There are a few problems with this nomination.  I don't necessarily agree with the recent change to Basketball notability.  I suspect that the Argentina league, which has provided several players directly to the NBA, including stars, should probably be considered a top-tier league.  But even if it is not, the MVP of the top league in a country that cares about the sport should not really be questioned as to notability.  In , for example, winners of top honors in not just 2nd tier leagues but 3rd tier leagues are assumed to be notable.  And I don't think there is any question that Argentina cares about basketball.  I also don't necessarily agree with Tapered's criteria for notability of a non-English source, although I understand the rationale and it could make sense as a screen.  But that said, reliability is not the same as notability, and a reliable source may be too small to be notable.  Or it may be notable but no one has bothered to write an article about it yet (that is the case for English sources as well, but Spanish Wikipedia is about 1/4 the size of English).  And of course there are notable sources that are not reliable (e.g., blogs and self-publishing houses.)  So judgment is always needed here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)