Deletion of Kay Mousley (2nd nomination)

Comment: per everybody above. This is a role that could get a person an article if it could be sourced well enough to get her over  for it, but not one that's so "inherently" notable that the mere fact that she held it would ''exempt'' her from having to have enough |reliable source coverage to clear GNG. But two of the five references here are |primary source documents from the electoral commission itself, which are not notability-assisting sources because they're not independent of her, and one is not about her but merely features her giving brief soundbite in an article about something else — while the two that are actually about her are just the initial announcement of her appointment, and the announcement of her resignation, which is not enough to get her over GNG if they're the ''only'' genuinely substantive sources that can be shown because there's no ''ongoing'' coverage of her work ''in'' the role
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)