Deletion of Marriage of Narendra Modi and Jashodaben Chimanlal

Comment: The subject of the article meets Wikipedia's |general notability guidelines as it has received coverage in |reliable sources repeatedly. Indian sources cited in this article include ''The Times of India'', ''India Today'' and ''The Hindu'', none of which should be called yellow journalism as these are among the most reputable English language news sources that India publishes. Outside of India, the British BBC, the Canadian ''The Globe and Mail'', and the United States ''The Washington Post'' are cited for their coverage of this topic. The earliest cited work was in ''OPEN (magazine)|OPEN'' in 2009 and the latest is from this month, so with a range of coverage over years I feel that this topic should not be excluded for being a . In the article on the prime minister, the topic of his marriage has never had more than one paragraph of coverage, so this is not already covered in the parent article and it would be  to merge this content there because there is enough information here for a standalone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SENSATION||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: or redirect to Narendra Modi, although the title is not a reasonable search term) as per issues of ,  and . This article is a perfect example of  {{small|(the essay needs to be written)}} in which instead of summarizing secondary sources (as a encyclopedia is supposed to do), editors scrape every possible minor mention of a topic and add excessive verbiage to make the result look "encyclopedic" in length, if not in content. To give a specific example: This ''http://www.caravanmagazine.in/reportage/emperor-uncrowned Caravan'' article covers Narendra Modi's marriage in 119 words (in a 17,858 word profile). Yet, somehow magically its contents have been ''expanded'' to  162 words and a separate section in the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marriage_of_Narendra_Modi_and_Jashodaben_Chimanlal&oldid=633224449#Marriage current version of the wikipedia article {{small|(and yes, I excluded the sole sentence in the section that cited another source, before counting the words)}}. Ditto for a flippant suggestion by an opposition MP that Jashodaben be awarded India's highest civilian honour, which gets a paragraph of its own. To summarize my !vote: the ''encyclopedic'' details of the article can and should be adequately ''summarized'' in the Narendra Modi article. The rest is fluff with obvious  issues (for Jashodaben Chimanlal, not Modi
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SENSATION||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT||WP:LARDING||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Meets GNG. May not be as well-known to those in the US or Britain as more local political nonsense, but nonetheless has adequate coverage. Perceived "triviality" is especially problematic as a criterion given that it falls outside of |English Wikipedia editors' usual interest areas &there4; Special:Contributions/ZX95|ZX95
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMIC)

Comment: The subject meets the |general notability guidelines and have significant coverage in |reliable sources as well as {{ping|Bluerasberry}} is wise and knowledgeable enough about the policies of Wikipedia hence his hardwork in improving the article should not be wasted and his comment should be considered while reviewing the AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)