Deletion of The Ballet of Change: Piccadilly Circus

Comment: I think Newsbank may have rebranded as http://www.newsuk.co.uk/newsuk/home.do NewsUK) Searching NewsUK for ''ballet change piccadilly'' (and variants) or ''piccadilly circus atherton'' produces exactly 1 relevant hit which is a 2 paragraph notice in the Evening Standard, a shortened version of the press release. (''michael atherton'' or ''richard branson'' produce >1000 hits for reference). As regards the National Film Archive it seems from their page that they pretty much keep everything, notable or not. To quote from their collecting policy "''It also includes new cultural products and records enabled by modern technology: moving images embedded or presented with sounds and texts; interactive computer games with close links to film culture; animated shorts produced with games authoring tools; CCTV and webcam images; works are created for websites, game consoles, PDAs and mobile telephones.''" I can't see being in the archive as enough to pass , otherwise every youtube clip or flash movie would pass. As to being the first film to be shown on an advertising billboard, again it has to be declared as notable by independent reliable sources. As the #cite_note-5 says ""This should not be too widely construed, as any film could ''claim'' a unique accomplishment such as "Only film where seven women in an elevator carry yellow handbags."" All in all no significant, independent coverage, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MOVIE||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: Letters to the editor written by the producer and press releases are non-notable per . I didn't see a single review in all those links listed in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE)

Comment: per , as sources being harder to find now does not mean the article has lost its original notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)