Deletion of Joel Weiner

Comment: This seems to me to be an example of |a person who has gained temporary notice for a single event; I also cannot see anything worth merging
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Asking one question on a regularly broadcast current affairs program doesn't even begin to fulfill even the vaguest of the general notability guidelines, let alone anything relating to . The episode itself is not notable for a separate article, so neither should an individual whose only claim to notability is an appearance in that episode. If his questioning is really that notable, a brief note could be made on the Question Time artcle page, but even this does not exist with the link in the article pointing to Question Time|Prime Minister's Questions instead, though his contribution could be placed on the United Kingdom general election debates, 2010 page, though I note no other questions have been deemed notable for inclusion in that article to date
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Too many spam links, which is not appropriate. Other than that, it does not meet , which in other words, meets the general notability guideline for biographies. Although he participated in the notable quiz Question time, he hasn't won any awards out of it or anywhere. The published sources are there, but fails my expectation of BLPs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: and possibly '''Merge''' to Question Time British National Party controversy. Although he has managed to appear on two high-profile TV debates, it was only the first one that attracted attention from the press. (I saw the BBC report after the leaders' debate, and that was merely repeating the question he asked.) This is a clear case of a |Biography of a living person notable for only one event where the person is best covered in the article about the event. Finally, I would recommend doing this for Joel's own protection - leave this page up, and it could become the target for some very nasty and determined vandalism
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I was an original reviewer who proposed deletion on Joel Weiner.  At that point, I only noted the one event and cited .  Though as I now understand Mr. Weiner has two events to his name, I still feel the article should be deleted for the same reason.  Per the  guideline, Mr. Weiner would be better included as a sub-section in each event article if his participation in the event was notable enough.  It is interesting to note that Mr. Weiner is not referred to in the articles Question_Time_British_National_Party_controversy or United_Kingdom_general_election_debates,_2010 suggesting his participation was not notable.  Mr. Weiner is unlikely to be a prominent figure in the future.  If he has another event to his name, I would reconsider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: A kid who posed a question to a politician?  Seriously?  , if that, to a T
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)