Deletion of 2011 Yuma shooting

Comment: per  - no sustained coverage, as my Google search only ever turned up sources from the first 5 days of June 2011. In addition, the article has been an orphan since 2011 (this isn't a reason to delete, but it is a sign that it's not a hugely notable event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The fact that "It was believed that the gun used in the shooting was a pistol", two years later, indicates that there is no  here. Fails , , is likely 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per , its highly unlikely to satisfy  in long run
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: I think  is an easy way to say delete without having to give real reasons for the decision.. wikipedia is based on news so for me NOTNEWS is a very weird guideline. anyway.. mass shootings are quite rare, here we have a mass shooting with 6 victims.. notable. WP:CRIME
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)