Deletion of Darwinian Theory and Ethical Problems

Comment: The article is not |neutral, and it would require a complete rewrite and retitling to become neutral. The article covering Darwinian theory may be able to fit a |sourced paragraph on ethical problems, but it can't be an essay. #SOAPBOX|Wikipedia is not a soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: At first glance, this appears to be an unsourced editorial, so it would be eligible for deletion under , , #SOAP, and . But the very last section, "Puppies" (which has been there since the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darwinian_Theory_and_Ethical_Problems&oldid=137211959 first revision), clearly demonstrates that it's all a leg pull, so delete as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:BJAODN)

Comment: as essay, should be a speedy close per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per  and various other policies cited above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Heavily breaches ,  and . This is someone's political campaigning. Abortion causes extinction? This article is a load of shit and an embarrassment to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:A)