Deletion of Richard Sebamala

Comment: pretty clear  fail. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in future elections they have not yet won — the notability test at  is ''holding'' a notable political office, not just running for one. But this makes no claim that he has preexisting notability for any reason that would have gotten him into Wikipedia independently of the candidacy, and cites not even remotely close to enough campaign coverage to make his candidacy more nationally special than everybody else's candidacies. Obviously no prejudice against recreation after election day if he wins the seat, but nothing here is a reason why he would already qualify to have a Wikipedia article today. Once again, with feeling: Wikipedia is ''not'' a free public relations database for aspiring politicians to advertise or promote their campaigns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: political candidate, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: per nom. The subject appears to be a well-established businessman but the sources do not rise to the level of notability for a Wikipedia article and therefore fails  and . Also, as a political candidate, this does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:NPOL)