Deletion of The Heaven Project

Comment: No, actually the sources don't satisfy  if you look at them carefully. ''Variety (magazine)|Variety'', although providing more than a passing mention, is essentially just a press release announcement, with no significant and no intellectually independent coverage in a trade publication. Essentially all it does is list, in prose form, the kind of data that IMDB lists:  production company, screenwriters, cast, yadda, yadda. Not a reliable source in this case. Do any of the people involved have an Academy Award? Is the movie headed to Sundance Film Festival|Sundance, or Cannes Film Festival|Cannes? Is the director a famous auteur? Although notability isn't inherited. Any articles on the film in a serious magazine on film criticism? Have any mainstream journalistic or academic film critics discussed it?  Note that the NYT mention is just a listing, nothing more, and doesn't count, and neither do the rest of the listings provided. It's just another Hollywood product until sufficiently reliable sources say it's notable. The article's subject lacks intrinsic notability at this time, and that can't be fixed with editing, otherwise I would be arguing to keep, as I have many times before (to the point of probably being considered an inclusionist by some
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: seems to be |notable, some |sources from: AOL http://movies.aol.com/movie/the-heaven-project/29684/main, the New York Times http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/390671/The-Heaven-Project/overview, Yahoo http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809859453/info, MSN http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2116273, Variety (magazine)|Variety http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960325.html?categoryid=13&cs=1, BIFA http://www.bifa.org.uk/awards/jury/2007.html, the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/03/01/high_noon_march_01_2007_news_article.shtml
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:RS)

Comment: based on satisfaction of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: without prejudice per nom. I just don't see any sufficiently notable sources about this forthcoming movie. The ''New York Times'' is just announcing it without any significant coverage. The ''Variety'' articles also essentially don't do much more than announce the movie, and IMDB or trailers don't count for notability ''per se''. Same for other sources. It's not like the pre-release press coverage for The Passion of the Christ or Brokeback Mountain, for example, which clearly were notable before release. I believe it violates  per the nom quote of the guidelines. At least at this point in time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: I don't really see how this fails . You can view the trailer for this film http://www.infernodistribution.com/production.htm here and http://www.winnipegsun.com/Entertainment/Movies/2007/06/14/4259305-sun.html here is at least one article where this film is mentioned
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)