Deletion of Hole in the Paper Sky

Comment: per topic meeting . I will not vilify a new editor simply because his edits are limited and show inexperience, and instead look to a film's coverage directly and in some detail in sources such as http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-justin-timberlake-composer-20170111-story.html ''Los Angeles Times'', http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-calfff08hole051008may10-story.html ''Orlando Sentinel'', http://www.topnews.in/jessica-biel-turns-producer-hole-paper-sky-2104522 ''TopNews'', http://www.itechpost.com/articles/28255/20160908/jessica-biel-returns-television-new-crime-drama-sinner.htm ''iTechPost'', http://www.soundtrackgeek.com/v2/soundtrack-review-hole-paper-sky/ ''SoundTrack Geek''. |These can be added through |regular editing. That his NEW contributions was tagged for a speedy https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hole_in_the_Paper_Sky&type=revision&diff=373283970&oldid=373283777 just '''one''' minute after being contributed and while it was being actively edited is worrisome.  Deletion of an arguably notable film is not per policy nor guideline  and it might have been better to suggest he begin articles in a draftspace. Best for the project is to allow him to add sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:HANDLE||WP:IMPROVE)

Comment: First step should be to improve the article, and/or tag it for improvement, not list it for deletion. Please review wikipedia policy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)