Deletion of Most Phallic Building contest (2nd nomination)

Comment: per our Wikipedia:Notability|notability policy.  It has significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.  It also seems to be more than just a short burst of news reports as policy addresses in #NEWS|What Wikipedia is not: News reports.  What policy dictates notability as to whether or not it has a "hope of expansion" or if it is a "smutty humour piece
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: As per #NEWS. A smutty humour piece in a magazine is neither notable nor encyclopedic, sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Meets . Has several reliable sources that prove notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)