Deletion of Probit model for panel data with heterogeneity and endogenous explanatory variables (2nd nomination)

Comment: I think this article fails a number of points on . It is a text-book style article and as such fails TEXTBOOK|Wikipedia is not a text book. It also appears to be a how-to style article and thus fails MANUAL. It is not written in accessible language and thus fails the "no academic language" requirement. Moreover, whilst I see a number of supporting references in the article, all I can see are the titles, so I do not know if they directly support the notability of this topic, so I have concerns about the extent to which  is actually met - whilst I am assuming the good faith of the editors who added it to the article it would be good to have this confirmed by someone with access to these journals. Also, this is a  or even  (since it is avoiding ) of Probit model
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTTEXTBOOK||WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:GNG||WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Neither "Too technical" nor "Too detailed" is a . What actual policy reason is being invoked here? Is it 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELREASON||WP:NOTGUIDE)