Deletion of Timeline of the future in forecasts (2nd nomination)

Comment: Additionally, let me just say I find it unimaginable that the first passed keep. By definition, events in the future are unverifiable. Just because there's a web link doesn't mean that they're going to happen, otherwise we're having Jurassic Park on our hands in a few years according to Mr. Clarke. People, please read #1, "expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". Plus, please note sockpuppets in the prior discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: JK! Easily fails #3. 'an article on "Weapons to be used in World War III" is not appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I agree with the nomination.  This is a speculative article that makes wild guesses at the future.    does give some leeway in these cases to scientific predictions, but this seems sourced to government and corporate spokespeople, futurologists, and science fiction writers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)