Deletion of Drizzt Do'Urden's Guide to the Underdark

Comment: I don't see how any of the points of  applies here. And in what definition does this article have "no meaning"? The http://www.drosi.de/archont/buy/id65565116912 German rpg index supports rpggeek that https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envoyer Envoyer #47 has a review of the German version. So there seem to be two reviews, which would be the minimum requirement to fulfill , right? I don't have access to that issue of the magazine myself, so a '''merge''' and redirect would also be fine for me until someone can add more
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks - The single review is not enough to pass , but there is no reason for it not to Redirect to the main article, with that one source moved over
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: or '''Merge''' to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks per below comments, in addition to the Pyramid (magazine)|Pyramid review, since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)