Deletion of The Music People (2nd nomination)

Comment: I DEPRODded, as it had been DEPRODded previously, before the 2011 AfD decision to delete).  No third party sources discuss this company.  Fails  by a long way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Companies are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their own self-published website technically verifies that they exist; they require |reliable source coverage ''about'' them in ''media'' to clear our notability standards. This cites none of the correct kind of sourcing at all, but between its incredibly generic name and the article's total ''lack'' of any uniquely identifying information (the actual name of even one person who's ever been involved with it, etc.) that might help to distill the signal to noise ratio at all, it's nearly impossible to even attempt to find the correct type of sourcing. Even on a ProQuest search for older pre-Googlable coverage, I get too many irrelevant text matches on usages like "From the first chord of the music, people went nuts" and "This album, I did what I felt was the right thing to do for the music. People didn't always understand" and "It was the music, people were singing" — and this article gives me literally nothing I can use to even ''try'' to filter for ''relevant'' hits. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable under , so it lives or dies on whether it clears  on the sourceability or not — but there's virtually no evidence that it actually does so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: Actually should be '''Speedy Delete''' as |G4 because this existed at the time of the previous AFD with a trivially different name and was missed on the close, and then this stub was moved into its place.  Nothing has changed since the AFD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)