Deletion of Quantum cybernetics

Comment: My biggest concern is the |vanity aspect of this article.  If this theory becomes notable enough, I'm sure someone other than the theory's inventor will create an article on it.  Even this new and improved version of the article is starting to lean more and more to be about the article's ''author'' than about the theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)

Comment: The sources only satisfy  in that they demonstrate that Mr. Groessing has in fact published his theory. I fail to see any |reliable independent sources that discuss it, wich means it's likely not notable enough, IMHO. (I'm not calling it pseudoscience, because I know zip about physics, but the general tone of the above discussion is at least indicative as to why reliable sources might not be eager to pick it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)