Deletion of Bullfrog International

Comment: Fixed Primary Criterion of . Added reliable secondary source to make the subject notable for an article. Included U.S Patent - #s
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Pretty spammy.  The "TM" in the first sentence is never a good sign. I could only find http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=DSNB&d_place=DSNB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0FBB3B87B644CC10&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM one brief article that took the company as its main subject, as well as a http://www.alacrastore.com/storecontent/bir/583332 directory-style listing, so this does not appear to meet the |primary notability criterion, which requires the subject of an article to be the subject of multiple, nontrivial sources that are independent of the subject. None of the other criteria of |Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) seem to be satisfied either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CORP)