Deletion of Kayla Short

Comment: A person qualifies for a Wikipedia article when she's the ''subject'' of |reliable source coverage. "Fashion Blog" is a |blog, not a media outlet, so it can't cover off notability, and the only sources present in the article are a directory of her own contributions to another blog, her own |primary source website about herself, and a local alt-weekly's "Best Local Stuff" reader poll — which means the only source that's ''independent'' of her is a ''blurb''. A person does ''not'' qualify for a Wikipedia article by self-publishing her own web presence; she qualifies for an article when she's been ''given'' enough attention by media ''independent'' of her to pass , but none of the sourcing present here shows anything of the sort whatsoever. No prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' somebody can do ''better'' — but this, as written, isn't even beginning to show the ''type'', let alone the ''volume'', of sourcing required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLOGS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG)