Deletion of Idiom dictionary (2nd nomination)

Comment: per the 2012 AfD, which found the concept notable, and per . In particular, "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written." The article is a stub. I have no strong objection to merging it somewhere, except that it would seem a somewhat uneasy fit at Idiom. Dictionary#Types might be OK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)