Deletion of Worksoft

Comment: Gartner’s selection criteria{{cite web | url=https://www.gartner.com/doc/2560415/gartner-evaluates-vendors-markets-magic#a-1831881412 | title=How Gartner Evaluates Vendors and Markets in Magic Quadrants and MarketScopes | work=Gartner, Inc. | accessdate=July 26, 2013}} for Magic Quadrant inclusion “cover(s) market share, revenue, number of clients, types of products or services, target market and other defining characteristics.”  Gartner only includes those companies it “considers to be the most important or best suited to the evolving needs of the majority of buyers.” The other leaders in the Magic Quadrant for Software Test Automation are Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, and Tricentis. Worksoft was ranked ahead of competitors{{cite web | url=http://techbeacon.com/highlights-gartner-magic-quadrant-software-test-automation | title=Highlights from the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Software Test Automation | work=Tech Beacon | accessdate=December 15, 2015}} such as Oracle, Borland, Ranorex, and TestPlant – all with Wikipedia entries. Forbes is an independent source() with a significant audience. The referenced article meets  criteria. An author’s employment status is not listed as a factor for consideration when evaluating potentially trivial coverage. Coverage of the Accenture - Worksoft partnership can also be found in other independent sources.{{cite web | url=http://sdtimes.com/accenture-and-worksofts-new-alliance-rethinkbd-2-1-beta-and-googles-participation-in-the-openstack-foundation-sd-times-news-digest-july-17-2015/ | title=Accenture and Worksoft’s new alliance | work=SD Times | accessdate=July 17, 2015}}{{cite web | url=http://www.ioebusiness.com/accentures-new-software-machinery-automated-artificial-intelligence-inside/ | title=Accenture's New device machinery: automated artificial Intelligence | work=IoE Business | accessdate=July 15, 2015}} A quick Google search for “Worksoft” or “Worksoft Certify” yields references to major partnerships with companies such as: Accenture{{cite web | url=https://www.accenture.com/us-en/blogs/blogs-intelligent-automation | title=Intelligent Automation: Connecting the Pieces to Achieve Bigger Possibilities | work=Accenture | accessdate=March 2, 2016}}{{cite web | url=https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/accenture-and-worksoft-to-accelerate-use-of-intelligent-automation-for-business-application-development-and-testing.htm | title=Accenture and Worksoft to Accelerate Use of Intelligent Automation for Application Development and Testing | work=Accenture | accessdate=July 13, 2015}}, IBM{{cite web | url=http://www.ibm.com/Search/?q=worksoft&v=18&en=utf&lang=en&cc=us&hpp=10&o=0&co=us&lo=any | title=Results for worksoft | work=IBM | accessdate=July 21, 2016}}, SAP SE{{cite web | url=http://scn.sap.com/community/chemicals/blog/2015/09/03/dow-chemical--driving-sap-business-process-quality-and-efficiency-through-test-automation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDY||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails . The 2 links from Gartner do not prove notability - there is no information about why Gartner decided to look at 12 companies and on what basis they were selected. The tech beacon references the same Gartner sources. The forbes article is actually not by a forbes staff but rather by a contributor - I wouldn't want to use it for CORPDEPTH. I found more references but they were all press releases or business journals - none of which is used for CORPDEPTH. Overall, the company is non-notable and not suitable for inclusion at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)