Deletion of Ephraim Shapiro (2nd nomination)

Comment: simply a "clergyman" of a congregation was also a headteacher. There's nothing notable here. Would seem to fail . There are no notable books or publications. So he seems to fail any notability guideline. After his death there were some accusations? So what? It might be fine to use him as an example on a wider article on child abuse in American Judaism or something. But really? Someone point me to a notability guideline he passes? Sure there are some news stories connected with the allegations - but you get that for any such
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: this minor non-entity rabbi who was later revealed to be a sick pervert, per  and  as per User: David Eppstein
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTSCANDAL)

Comment: per , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTSCANDAL)

Comment: This person is not just notable for a single event. There is reliably sourced information during his lifetime of him being a spiritual leader, found in book publications, long before the posthumous scandal of his molestation came out. So this article cannot be deleted over a |single event issue. The BLP guidelines cannot be applied either because he is deceased. NOTSCANDAL is also an invalid argument here because this article is filled with sourced information, not just whoever coming on and writing their feelings of a person. The person who gave the NOTSCANDAL argument |did not explain why that is applicable either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:JUSTAPOLICY)