Deletion of Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy

Comment: while in fact most occurances in print of the society's name are mere mentions, those editors who indicated that it had no substantive coverage in secondary sources missed a fair number of book sources.  For example to list three I found within the first twenty Google book hits (there were 506 hits listed): The page+ (pp. 162–164) in Graham Oppy|Graham Oppy's book https://books.google.com/books?id=oXxXxBXewzgC&pg=PA162 The Antipodean Philosopher: Public Lectures on Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, which discussed not only the society's antecedents, and its founding but also the importance of a number of the articles published by it. The introduction to ''Trauma, History, Philosophy'' (2009) discusses the 2006 conference of the society in detail, which is quite proper as the book is a compilation, under the editorial oversight of Cambridge Scholars Publishing, of papers presented there. The society is also covered in a full paragraph (page 326, note 32), not just a passing mention, in Judith Butler's and Rosi Braidotti's "Out of Bounds: Philosophy in an Age of Transition" in Rosi Braidotti's ''After Poststructuralism: Transitions and Transformations''.  The society certainy verifies, and has substantive coverage in reliable independent sources.  Whether that coverage is significant is a judgment call.  I come down on the side of yes.  Graham Oppy|Graham Oppy's book also shows the significance of the society in the field of endeavor, and as the related guideline () says: '' is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNAL)

Comment: Insufficient coverage to pass . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)