Deletion of Massimo Angelini

Comment: Most of the information in the article did not check out when I attempted verification. There is absolutely nothing by this guy or citing him in MathSciNet or Web of Science. The ArXiv also has not heard of him or his theorems. Nothing of relevance in GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Massimo%20Angelini%22&sa=N&tab=ps. You cannot get a "famous physisist" with no publications and no mentions of your work in scholarly articles. Fails  and . I don't think he passes  either. GoogleNewshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn&q=%22Massimo+Angelini%22 and GoogleBookshttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Massimo+Angelini%22&sa=N have nothing of relevance about him or his books. I don't see evidence of substantial coverage by independent reliable sources here as required by . Moreover, given the problems with all the unverified and potentially contentious claims in this article, and given the fact that this is a BLP article,  gives us an extra reason to delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:BLP)