Deletion of List of fictional computers

Comment: Yes they are riginal research, but so are most lists on WP.  These are actually interesting, to some anyway, and useful to a person wanting to learn more about the history of computers and robots in fiction
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: Categories are not superior to lists and it is not our policy to replace one with the other - please see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLS)

Comment: due to no actual reason presented as to why this |verifiable and |notable content must urgently be protected from the public eye.  The articles passes  by being discriminate listings that provide a navigational/table of contents function as well.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:LISTS)

Comment: Considering almost all some of the entries are cross-linked to articles I don't think otability|notability or erifiable|verifiable sources is a problem and the lists themselves seem to be properly bounded in the leading entry. In fact I think the lists are pretty well maintained considering how badly lists can rollercoaster out of control in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)