Deletion of Ed Giecek

Comment: I'm not seeing evidence that this person satisfies the criteria of . (As an aside, a work's presence in a museum's collection does not mean that the work is "displayed" or "exhibited" at the museum, as the article and some of the commenters above claim
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: does not appear to meet the threshold for notability as an |artist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: per the lack of significant coverage in multiple independent Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources. I searched for reliable sources and did not find any.The subject fails Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject".I agree with Nha Trang's and Deor's comments about how  is not met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: the single award is pretty much .  There isn't the depth of coverage that I'd expect to see if Giecek was a leading notable artist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)