Deletion of Serbophobia (third nomination)

Comment: After reviewing the content of Bosniakophobia, its deletion discussion, and further comments made here, it's simply not possible to accept this as a good-faith nomination. This is clearly an attempt to |make a point. If it is possible to Speedy Delete an AfD, this should be Speedied immediately to prevent further disruption
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: This appears to be a well-established term; I suspect the nomination is simply |disrupting Wikipedia to make a point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: For me the entire article and the word ''per se'' seems like a propagandistic Arkanoid atempt to make people in the Western World “think twice about criticizing Greater Serbia|Serb ultranationalism”, and a try to “glue” the “concept of Serbophobia” (that includes, according to the article, any questioning about Bosnia and Herzegovina|Bosnia’s Republika Srpska) to things like racism or homophobia. And the entire article is an extense piece of a so propagandistic yext that even in a section called “Criticism” there are positive opinions! My opinion is: '''dump the entire article.''' It’s a ridiculous piece of #OR|original #SOAP|propaganda #DICT|wording that doesn’t deserve to be in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)