Deletion of Consensus science (2nd nomination)

Comment: A lot of hot air blown about nothing significant.  There is often consensus in science.  Sometimes it is proven incorrect.  Kind of like anything else that people try to figure out.  But the terminology in this article is used to promote a strongly NPOV stance.  I see no way that it will ever meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)