Deletion of Sarah Beattie-Smith

Comment: Local coverage of local elections ''always'' exists, so it falls under  and an unelected candidate for political office does not permanently clear  just because of that coverage alone — to attain notability on the campaign coverage itself, it would have to be shown that her campaign coverage had exploded ''far'' out of proportion to what any candidate for office could always show, such as what happened to Christine O'Donnell in 2010. Absent that, the only other way to get her in the door is to show that she ''already'' cleared a Wikipedia notability standard for some ''other'' reason ''independent'' of her candidacy itself — but nothing here demonstrates that either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG)

Comment: I put a Prod notice on this article soon after it was created last April, with the rationale ''"Neither the subject's place on a candidate list nor listed positions are sufficient for the  or broader  notability criteria."''. The Prod was removed by the article creator on the basis of newspaper predictions that her party would obtain a list seat, which would go to her, in the then-forthcoming election. This  prediction didn't happen. That leaves the question of whether her subsequent media activity is sufficient to establish any encyclopaedic notability: I think not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:POLITICIAN||:WP:BIO||:WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: She does not seem to meet the notability criteria for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:GNG)