Deletion of Vanessa Beeley (2nd nomination)

Comment: clearly notable and has recieved substantial coverage in mainstream sources. Delete votes reflect  advocacy attempting to give  as a volation of . Attempting to suggest that the conspiracy theories around White Helmets are credible is arguably a  violation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:PROFRINGE||WP:FALSEBALANCE||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP)

Comment: She is notable. Special:Diff/991083596|The version of the page linked here cites and accurately represents numerous reliable sources, complying with both the  and  policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: An article having {{tq|become a battleground}} is not a reason to delete it, particularly when there is every indication that a fully policy-compliant version could be written. Indeed, as {{u|CowHouse}} points out, such a version appears to exist within the article history already. The available sources indicate that the notability bar is cleared. The existing text is good enough that there's no need to blow it up and start over (i.e.,  does not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)