Deletion of Manufacturing Innovation Hub for Apparel, Textiles and Wearable Tech

Comment: it is a one-paragraph stub that could actually use a little expansion (NYT is mentioned in 'further reading' but not incorporated into the body-prose), but satisfies  pretty easily (Architectural Digest is the 3rd-best-cite and Women's Wear Daily has two pieces plus various trade-rags on top of the more general-news-outlets).  Quick search turns up Harper's Bazaar piece from January 2015,http://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/trends/a4851/fashion-incubator-brooklyn-010714/ and some hits at City of New York municipal government and at the Small Business Administration hearings,smallbusiness.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2-22-2016_bland_testimony.pdf too, which even when '' in partially funding the project tend to be treated as inherently-RS.  (This incubator is part of a larger quasi-privatized textile-industry-reboot, see Massachusetts Institute of Technology|MIT and NYT#2.http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/technology/us-textile-industry-turns-to-tech-as-gateway-to-revival.html?src=buslnhttp://news.mit.edu/2016/national-public-private-institute-innovations-fibers-fabrics-0401) Special:Contributions/47.222.203.135|47.222.203.135
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INVOLVED)

Comment: The NYT and Inc. articles provide sufficient coverage to address 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)