Deletion of Rufo Sánchez

Comment: yeah, the article says he is professional but he plays in a semi-professional league. Given his apparent ability and international move-on-loan, that's probably accurate but I certainly couldn't find an  to verify it. Strictly speaking, he fails . There's a stack of passing-mention coverage of him and his involvement in various matches but it's mostly, ''"Rufo Sánchez also scored"'' and ''"x scored, as did Rufo Sánchez"''. However, "headline" photos like the one attached to http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/296796/sports/football/ufl-stallions-trample-coach-less-kaya-to-keep-up-with-global this story, suggestions he http://sports.inquirer.net/88559/ufl-global-stallion-xis-try-to-remain-unbeaten "leads" the team's attack and multiple mentions in http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/293940/sports/football/ufl-stallions-trample-green-archers-in-ufl-cup-semis-rematch stories like this make me wonder whether he could meet  with some work. And then there's http://www.spin.ph/sports/football/news/stallion-continues-to-thrive-under-new-system-in-rout-of-psg this article that describes him as ''"the Spanish striking sensation"'' and http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/281096/sports/football/ufl-cup-quarterfinals-cast-set-as-new-order-emerges-in-phl-football this one that attributes the team's status as the ''"dark horses of the competition"'', in part, to his signing. All things considered, I find myself weakly in favour of keeping this - more to see if it ''could'' be improved, rather than with an assumption that can... if that makes sense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: fails , and not enough to satisfy  from what I can see
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Doesn't meet notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: None the of this even comes close to being significant coverage. All of these sources are routine sports journalism. All of them are match reports (the photo is incidental), except the second one, which is a routine match preview, making them insufficient for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The nature of the sources fail to justify inclusion.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)