Deletion of Michael Corbat

Comment: I came here because of the college football reference.  Just based on that, he would likely not be notable--but why check?  The CEO of Citgroup generates enough press to surpass  and is worthy of inclusion.  The college football information is a good entry into the article of an already well-established notable individual
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets |GNG. Multiple sources about Corbat specifically, not just Citigroup in general, including https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444354004578060481361878480 WSJ, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-citigroup-corbat/newsmaker-touchdown-for-corbat-after-30-years-on-wall-street-idUSBRE89F1PI20121016 Reuters, https://www.cnbc.com/id/49430769 CNBC, https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/meet-citis-new-c-e-o/ NY Times (Dealbook) and http://www.businessinsider.com/michael-corbat-new-ceo-of-citi-2012-10#ixzz29cZuxp73 Business Insider. This makes sense, since he's the CEO of such a large company. I was expecting to need to demonstrate notability by patching together isolated mentions in various articles about Citigroup, but with so many dedicated articles on Corbat himself, I see no reason to delete. I genuinely don't understand the complaint that the references only include " information about the guy". What else do you want them to include
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)