Deletion of Alan Neill

Comment: per , umpired in ODIs. They're inherently notable. This could be different if it was about first-class umpire
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Walled-garden single-subject notability standards don't trump basic  standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Development Panel of ICC Umpires. These umpires officiate at the lower levels and often do not pass . The cricket notability guidelines are controversial and judgement is required for biographies at the lower end of their notability spectrum. This article along with other development panel umpires are likely to only ever be permastubs so merging them will preserve the information. If they progress then the article can easily be split back out again
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: none of the keep arguments provide any proof that the subject passes  which is telling for a contemporary "notable" person
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this is not cricketpedia and it is not appropriate to create a special standard apart from and wildly divergent from  to support pages on subjects that lack sig cov. The guideline cited might supoort subject's name on a list, but not a stand alone page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  - "has appeared as a player or umpire in at least one cricket match that is judged by a substantial source to have been played at the highest international or domestic level". Has umpired in multiple international matches (ODIs and T20Is) and is part of the ICC Associate and Affiliate Panel of Umpires. Has also stood in matches in Ireland's top-level competitions (2017 Inter-Provincial Championship and 2017 Inter-Provincial Trophy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: passes  as confirmed by reliable sources already in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRICKET)

Comment: lacks  as would be expected of a BLP (or any other article, but BLPs in particular).  also requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, and a technical pass of an SNG does not exempt an article from such coverage being demonstrated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SPORT)