Deletion of Mark Sirkin

Comment: Insufficient substantial coverage in reliable independent secondary sources to meet any of our notability guidelines. Solid, but not remarkable academic with no extraordinary accomplishments or awards, and coverage that is run-of-the-mill, routine and trivial at best, and perhaps even lackluster. My own searches turned up nothing promising. Fails  by a wide mile
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Sadly, no evidence of meeting  and . All I can see is self-publish work, that are insufficient to merit an article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Given whats available about the only possibility for notability is  #7, but I don't see evidence for it either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: does not seem to pass  (or GNG); with thanks to DGG for his good work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)