Deletion of Maryscott O'Connor

Comment: Does not meet any criteria of , so far as I can see.  1) Multiple independent published works from reliable sources about her?  We've got one, which is not multiple.  2) Enduring historic record?  Not yet.  3)  Elected official - nope.  4) Local elected official with significant press coverage - nope, and none visible.  5)  Widely recognized entertainment figures and opinion makers (Hollywood walk of fame level) - no evidence presented.  6) Sportspeople - nope.  7) Actor/TV personality - nope.  8) Published author with multiple independent reviews of their work - no published reviews seen  9) Professionals whose work is likely to enter the enduring record - nope, not a professional, and no evidence yet that her blog entries will still be known in 10 years, let alone a generation.  10) Renown or notoriety for involvement in newsworthy events - 1 article in the press does not constitute renown; that is when the press just uses the name and everyone is expected to know who it is.  As all  criteria are failed, the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: She meets  and her blog meets . However, the should be handled in the same article. I would suggest making My left wing a redirect to her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:WEB)

Comment: I suppose if she wants to keep it as her user page, no harm there. The autobiographical angle isn't my main concern: it's that she doesn't meet the criteria at . (By contrast, the blog does meet  criteria.) Author of non-notable blog implies no notability. Blog was strongest assertion, so speedy candidate now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:WEB)

Comment: self promotion. If meets  someone could write the article, but I don't think the editor should be the same person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)