Deletion of List of Magic: The Gathering keywords

Comment: This article easily passes #GUIDE, as it contains more that just a rote listing of game mechanics.  The article covers not only the keywords themselves but the history of the keyword, set in which the keyword was introduced, and in some cases the effects the introduction of a new keyword had on existing cards.  I believe this falls well under the "analysis and critical commentary" criteria.  Additionally, the mere listing of game rules does not make an article a "game guide"; the article is about the keywords present in the Magic: the Gathering card game, so it would make little sense to mention the terms without defining them.  The article does not go into any great detail explaining the terms and does not provide any sort of "how-tos" or examples; if it had, ''that'' would be a game guide.  As it is the article glosses over certain details anyway and does not even provide enough information to be used as an instruction manual, much less a game guide. -- |Y'''&#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IKNOWBEST)

Comment: Even if it fails #GUIDE (which it doesn't), it fails #DIRECTORY even more strongly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: This is a game guide and fails #GUIDE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I see this page as a list of definitions, useful most likely to people who don't play Magic, not as any sort of guide. Looking at Time Spiral, on the right is a long list of keywords that are in the set. Although some like "Echo", "Flash", "Flashback", "Kicker", "Suspend", and "Storm" all sound interesting and are perhaps a little indicative of what they actually do, most people who happen upon the article are going to be clueless. That's why we have this page. Rather than put little footnotes or additional sections in every Magic article, we link here. I don't see how that makes this a guide, since it does not "include instructions, suggestions or how-tos", is not a "tutorial, instruction manual, video game guide, or recipe." (#GUIDE 1) (After all, we have List of Internet slang phrases.) As some of you have said, the content is useful or "fine." In saying this, you should at least be voting Merge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I love the game, but this is a game guide and fails #GUIDE. Sections in the set articles discussing the development of new rules and keywords is fine, but just listing off the rules is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)