Deletion of Deal or No Deal game strategy

Comment: this article is largely |unsourced |original research (and where it is not it is redundant with Game Theory) and it is a | game guide to boot.   isn't a valid reason for retention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: it's just a game guide/technical manual. Contains reams of OR and would set a poor precedent for similar Gameshow X strategy articles. Note that most of the 'Keep' comments are simply saying |'I like it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: per nom, per Bwithh, per Nydas. per  a game guide, and per .  There might be some tiny bits that are worth salvaging, but if so, those should be rewritten (from scratch, don't merge) in the article about the show (if they're not already there).  From my brief read-through, I suspect there's very few such bits in any case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOR)

Comment: despite it being interesting, it is still |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: For once,  a game guide actually applies. Can be '''merge'''d as a short section into Deal or No Deal. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: it may be interesting, but at best it is a summary of an academic paper, and if not that, it is a |game guide.  Either way, it is not suitable to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)