Deletion of Wishing Well Foundation USA

Comment: The article text predominantly concerns public discussion on the high proportion of this organisation's fundraising which goes to administration. My searches find only more similar coverage (https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-35605082.html New Orleans CityBusiness 2014 "Metairie-Based Wish-Granting Nonprofit Spends Little on Goal" {{Highbeam}}). Leaving aside public-service arguments, which are not appropriate for either positive or negative coverage, there may be a question of whether the accumulation of negative coverage is evidence of notability, but as it stands I think this is insufficient for  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)

Comment: Significant coverage in both ''USA Today'' and ''Tampa Bay Times'' satisfies . Significant scams are notable if they generate sustained coverage, which appears to be present
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)