Deletion of LA Wiki

Comment: as insufficiently notable per . No evidence that there has been non-trivial coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This is not  - these articles were kept b/c they make assertions of notability that reference themselves. Comparison is to reasons for keeping them, not that they exist. All http://www.thelawiki.com LA Wiki has to do is assert notability for itself and it will survive this process Re: other city wikis which do just that. (See paragraph 1 of ther Stuff Exists)  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/152.3.78.87|152.3.78.87
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:O)

Comment: per nom and . The LA Wiki is not ready to promote itself anywhere given its extreme lack of content. Furthermore, someone knowledgeable about GFDL should bring to the attention of the powers that be at Wikipedia that http://www.thelawiki.com/Los_Angeles LA Wiki's article on Los Angeles was apparently copied from Wikipedia's Los Angeles, California without proper attribution under GFDL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)