Deletion of DHSA

Comment: there must be hundreds of thousands (millions?) of chemicals turning up in the  chemistry literature. Lacking secondary or tertiary sources demonstrating interest beyond very narrow technical specialists, this topic lacks the notability required for an article. The lack of such sources also render the article largely incomprehensible jargon, of little interest to a wider readership
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: chemicals that are of scholarly interest, and are |well-attested to the degree this has been, should be considered notable.  |We have deleted non-notable chemicals before, though this is not one of those. Currently, the stub is basically |original research and may need incubation or rescue. FWIW, I got an A in biochemistry 25 years ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OR)