Deletion of Vicki Iseman (2nd nomination)

Comment: to John McCain lobbyist controversy per  and the essay . She is not notable in her own right; the controversy is
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:PSEUDO)

Comment: An important aspect of the enforcement of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons is to uphold the intent of the policy, not to enforce the letter of the policy in a manner contrary to its purpose -- see #BUREAUCRACY.  Arguments for the deletion of this article focus on a largely mechanical application of  to the subject matter, without considering whether the general mandate of the policy to strictly adhere to a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view and "Wikipedia:Do no harm|do no harm" is thereby effectuated.  Is it seriously contended that limiting coverage of Vicki Iseman to the John McCain lobbyist controversy article, thereby covering ''only'' the controversial aspects of her life, and ''nothing'' about the positive aspects of her career, somehow ''furthers'' the application of  and "Wikipedia:Do no harm|do no harm"?  Deletion of the article is radically inconsistent with the purpose of the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons policy, as the deletion would compromise our neutrality and fair treatment of Vicki Iseman by ensuring that we provide no positive coverage whatsoever, and instead mention only the controversy surrounding her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E||WP:NPOV)