Deletion of Centre for Anglo-German Cultural Relations

Comment: Our |editing policy indicates that deletion is inappropriate because there are better alternatives such as merger with articles about QMC or Anglo-German relations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: to Queen Mary, University of London. Not enough material to support a standalone page but certainly plenty enough sources to support a merge. I note that the nomination is fatally flawed since it hasn't addressed a merge as required by  which is also the case with the delete !votes
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: the only hits I can find on this source is a few ''mere mention'' of the fact that this or that academic is affiliated with it. It therefore fails "significant coverage". And no, it is third-party coverage that matters, not s. It is easily possible for university programmes to have classes in the thousands, but be so blandly generic and mechanical (i) that nobody would bother commenting on them & (ii) they're indistinguishable from similar programmes in any other large university. There is http://www.rae.ac.uk/results/qualityProfile.aspx?id=137&type=hei no indication that the research in this field is sufficiently prominent to merit a mention in the Queen Mary, University of London article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:BIGNUMBER)