Deletion of John Lucaites

Comment: As well as the reasons advanced above, which show notability by #C1, #C2 and #C5 (none of which requires the in-depth independent sourcing of ) his books have many published reviews (now added to the article), giving him an easy pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The only citations are primary sources from universities. An article solely or mostly using primary sources does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per #1, he passes with many highly cited works: 8 works with 100+ citations for a low citation field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: The "Provost Professor" title doesn't appear to be quite as high a ranking in their system as "Distinguished Professor" or a named chair https://vpfaa.indiana.edu/faculty-resources/awards-lectures/awards/provost-professor.htmlhttps://policies.iu.edu/policies/aca-39-distinguished-ranks/index.html, but it's not to be sneezed at, either. The cases for passing #C1, #C2, and  also look solid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Plenty of reviews for , plenty of citations in what I believe to be a moderate citation field for  C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)