Deletion of Contraception

Comment: really, really looks like , a totally unnecessary creation of a page that unnecessarily complicates the issue.  Splitting birth control into pre- versus post-fertilization is unnecessary and is best clarified on the specific birth control method pages.  Unless there's a lot of support that ''clearly and easily'' indicates this is a distinction made by doctors on a regular basis, it's a bad idea for a page
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Let me try a more substantiated approach. I see absolutely nothing in the subject itself that can possibly fail ,  or . It is a notable and quite verifiable subject that, in my view, undoubtedly merits an article of its own. Yes, it is one of techniques used in Birth Control, but what of it? We don't redirect Texas to the United States simply because it happens to be one of its states, do we? Some claim the terms are synonymous — they are clearly not. Some say the content of the discussed article represents a non-neutral point of view. Again, this has nothing absolutely to do with Birth Control. The quality of the content can easily be improved and the article can easily be tagged with the appropriate templates. The rest of the arguments seem to be largely irrelevant to the question of deletion and should probably be discussed on the appropriate talk pages. Here are some relevant links
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:OR)