Deletion of Franklin Miller

Comment: Searching Franklin Miller Scowcroft turns up a lot of sourcing.  The Scowcroft Group, Atlantic Council and post in the George W. White House make it almost certain that article can be sourced.  and, as Nom says, , our job is to determine the notability of the subject.  Searching  without the middle initial, and with keywords like "nuclear" in WaPo, NYTimes, gScholar  and elsewhere turns up copious confirmation of notability.  And gBooks, look at this search on: Franklin Miller nuclear (no "_") in gBooks https://www.google.com/search?q=franklin+miller+nuclear&client=firefox-b-1&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjX-OP94r3eAhWCvFMKHfywA74Q_AUIGCgB&biw=1337&bih=765: "Franklin Miller is both the father and the architect of the U.S.-UK dialogue on nuclear weapons policy...",   "As principal deputy assistant secretary, Franklin C. Miller is a civil servant who has been the nuclear major domo in the ...", "Former National Security Council and Defense Department official Franklin Miller (who played a key role in U.S. nuclear policy for the past two decades) said in ...", and  more, similar.   Article needs expansion, improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: The KBE satisfies , and he also seems to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:SPIP)

Comment: There are claims here that would qualify him for an article if he could be properly referenced as getting over  for them — but the only "reference" being cited here at all is his "our staff" profile on the self-published website of his own current employer. The article states nothing about him that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be sourced much better than this, however, and even going all the way back to its initial creation in 2006 it's ''never'' been sourced any better than this — the only other reference this article has ''ever'' cited at all was his "our staff" profile on the self-published website of a different ''former'' employer, which is not a notability boost
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Holders of an Honorary KBE are certainly notable per  #1. We have always held that CBEs (the grade below KBE) or above meet the criteria. Honorary knighthoods are not that commonly awarded to foreign nationals and are only awarded to very senior people. And it appears that he does have one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)