Deletion of The Big Event

Comment: Almost none of the sources seem to be reliable by the standards of . www.thehistoryofwwe.com is not a reliable source, prowrestlinghistory.com isn't either. We have a mention in a book that ''might'' be a reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: While I still feel this is far from notable, I will withdraw the nomination.  It has gone through the usual pro wrestling "improvement" drive of adding sources from fansites, which are clearly not .  And most of the "32 sources" are from the same website.  Total junk, but if you want this place to be a cesspool, that's your fault
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I am the wrestling fan who removed the prod for such fanboy reasons as the event actually being |Notable and at the time had one |Reliable source as well (I guess assuming good faith isn't necessary when it comes to pro wrestling??). Furthermore I've gone ahead and shown that there are plenty of sources on this event which shows 3-4-5 places that independently report the same results etc. I'd say it's well within the guidelines of what should or should not have an article on Wikipedia - but what do I know, I'm just a fanboi apparently
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)