Deletion of SimGirls

Comment: No independent or verifiable sources and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: Fails the |general notability guideline due to a lack of |reliable secondary sources offering significant coverage of the game. In plain English: video games need reviews from unaffiliated sources whose video game coverage is held in high esteem. WP isn't a video game database, articles need more than information on how the game plays and this information needs to come from vetted sources because wikipedia contributors are not themselves 'reliable sources', nor are website comments from average joes (anyone can leave comments). It's always advisable that those with a |conflict of interest (like developers) allow other contributors to handle articles on their creations.   Hope this helps to clarify things CerealKlr
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:COI)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: No reliable third-party sources and so this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: the SimGirls content on newsgrounds appears to be submitted by the game's author http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/50364 http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/390578 and forum chatter; remaining web search hits are the usual online hosts. Thus the subject fails the general notability guideline requirement of independence (), not to mention that the article is borderline Speedy G11
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)