Deletion of Outstanding elements of Babylon 5

Comment: I continue to make https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outstanding_elements_of_Babylon_5&type=revision&diff=802908528&oldid=802460374 improvements to the article.  I am not finished, nor am I asking for a  reevaluation as there remains work to do, but I believe I have conclusively demonstrated that everything here can either be deleted or sourced, i.e., the article can be fixed through normal editing and deletion is unnecessary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: It doesn't seem like any of the information here doesn't violate . Being that it's most likely in Babylon 5 Wiki already, I submit it should be deleted, and if anyone thinks they can reference it to the point of notability, draftified until such time as it's approved by a reviewer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: WP:INDISCRIMINATE list of . Even if every word of it was sourced, it would need to be to sources that themselves aren't fancruft, and to include some non-arbitrary criteria for inclusion, whereas the only criteria for inclusion now appears to be that |a particular editor decided to write about it. This adds little to nothing beyond what is provided by Template:Babylon 5, and belongs on Wikia, if anywhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:OR)