Deletion of Naphcon-A

Comment: I added some more information to the article and a reference to the FDA information verifying almost all of what is said in the article. I consider the FDA information on a drug to be reliable source because the information has been vetted by the FDA, an independent party from the manufacturer. In addition to the in-depth FDA information, two in-depth reliable sources were found by Colapeninsula. There are also about 2,400 hits in Google books for '"Naphcon A" -wikipedia'; this is a widely referenced product. Multiple in-depth reliable sources show the topic to be notable per . The article itself could use more references and development, but has no major problems with spam or a non-neutral point of view. A notable topic and surmountable problems with the article, per , suggest that the article be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)