Deletion of Taquan Air

Comment: Well, if the entity is notable, there would be an article about in the Anchorage Daily News. And there isn't. There are some articles the ''mention'' the entity, but if I read  right we are looking for ''coverage'', something like at least a short feature on the entity itself. And if the Anchorage Daily News doesn't care about the entity, why should we? On the other hand... gee, it's a nice enough article. Someone went to to the trouble to dig up ''27'' refs and do all that writing, and you hate to just toss that away, and  is just a guideline, and its not like the article is spam or anything like that. I know, we're not supposed to pay mind to article quality, but you kind of can't help that sometimes. I don't really know what to "vote", it seems on the bubble, but given all the discussion above then a '''no consensus to delete''' close would seem reasonable to me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CORP)

Comment: There does seem to be enough coverage from multiple sources to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)