Deletion of August 2010 West Bank shooting (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per Wikipedia:Notability (events). I see there is no clear agreement, so I've tried to form my own opinion. First I brushed through August_2010_West_Bank_shooting#References|article's references. It seems sources define a topic here and it enjoys |general notability, since it is reported both by primary reliable sources like Ma'an, Jerusalem Post, Ha'aretz, YNET and also major international secondary reliable sources around the globe: Wall Street Journal, AFP, Washington Post, Reuters. Now what about ? There is violence in the region all the time. It seams to be routine. However not every violent event in the region reaches pages of Wall Street Journal. In this particular case, it appears sources discuss the event in context of Direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in 2010|current round of peace talks and it is reported and analyzed widely around the world. So I guess we have both ''historical significance'' & ''diversity of sources'' which are both Wikipedia:Notability (events)|'''Inclusion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as |Wikipedia is not the news. There is no evidence of lasting impact. Every source is within one week of the incident. It may be newsworthy, but not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The event was an attempt by the de-facto government of the Gaza Strip to cause the resignation of the President of the Palestinian Authority and to sabotage talks between the latter and Israel. So the notion that this was merely news with no significant impact is absurd. Add to that the fact that this was an uncommonly deadly and brutal terror attack in a relatively peaceful period in an important region, and it's easy to see why the event has received continuous coverage in reliable, independent sources until this very day (http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/hamas-planned-to-abduct-bodies-of-israeli-terror-victims-in-west-bank-1.314780  http://www.themedialine.org/news/news_detail.asp?NewsID=30074 http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3957083,00.htmlhttp://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=317207http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-09/18/c_13517738.htmhttp://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/09/20109176481625485.htmlhttp://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/09/08/Palestinian-Authority-nabs-Hamas-gunmen/UPI-74911283945099/ etc.), making it a textbook case of a notable 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: per JClemens and the editors he cites. Guidelines like WP:EVENT represent the community consensus as to how the often-mentioned  policy is to be applied. To read the two as being in conflict is to reject the established community consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: A straight news story no more notable than the 15000+ murders in the United States each year. Wikipedia is |not the news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: just the same as AfD #1 which unfortunately was brought to DRV for "I disagree with the result" reasons".  This is WP:NOTNEWS|news, this is not a significant or historic event.  Maybe it's a sad commentary on the state of world affairs that such attacks are considered almost routine news, but that's the way it is.  The Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a vehicle to prop up importance of one's personal causes and interests.  Elevating this |event to an article does exactly that.  If appropriate, reuse/recycle some of the sources in a larger article on Israeli-Palestine conflicts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: per . This was not routine coverage. I was in Israel at the time this occurred, and this was Israel's ''main'' news for several days.  is against ''routine'' news, and this was anything but routine. This has had an effect on national security, with additional checkpoints being set up, and longer lines at the airport. This was related to the peace talks, an internationally covered event with lasting impact
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and User:nableezy above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The lack of anything after September 2 (two days after the August 31 killing of four persons who happened to be Israeli citizens) pretty well shows that the original  closing was correct.  At best, this gets a mention in Direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in 2010.  To hold otherwise is to open the door for an article every time a civilian has been killed in political violence anywhere in the world and anytime in history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per , unless we are going to have separate articles on every Palestinian attack, and every Israeli retaliation, from the last 10 years or more - not to mention an article for Drone attacks in Pakistan|every U.S. drone strike in Pakistan, List of suicide bombings in Iraq in 2004|every suicide bombing in Iraq, and so on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: cant see how  applies here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)