Deletion of Bipolar Advantage

Comment: I don't see any significant coverage.  Fails .  The ''Psychology Today'' citation seems to be a hosted blog post by an entrepreneur / archeology professor, which is not exactly what I would look for in order to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: mdash;Self-published book that has minimal coverage.  Fails , let alone .  I found exactly two newspaper articles that discussed the book that weren't merely announcements of the author's lectures.  One in the Sacramento Bee from 2009 and the other from the Davis Enterprise in 208.  These are both partly interviews, partly book reviews, and partly press releases.  Both articles were timed to promote upcoming lectures.  Note that the notability guideline specifically "excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book." OK, I see I got the organization confused with the book, which is being Prodded.  Anyway, there's no significant coverage of the organization outside of passing mentions related to lists of speaking engagements and so forth.  Fails both  and .&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:GNG)