Deletion of James W. Glasgow

Comment: Fails .  County level office with little in-depth coverage in independent sources. Much of the article is about the Peterson case, not directly about Glasgow. Much of the material not about that one case is sourced to the Joliet Patch, a small community specific news outlet. This is not significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: I think that the biggest issue with the article is it focuses on the Drew Peterson case, and to a lesser extent the use of dogs in courtrooms to help calm children. You may be right about all the points about a potential conflict of interest, in which case that could be raised and addressed. As well as its tone and the sources that are used. I think a lot of people coming in fresh don't understand the importance of |reliable econdary sources|secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:S)