Deletion of List of wedding guests of Prince William of Wales and Kate Middleton

Comment: WP:N passed, #NEWS, not so much
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'm not finding anything against this (: most of the guests have an article; : not breaking news, not routine; : these are not "loosely associated topics" nor "cross-categorizations"). It has several reliable sources and parent article is notable. When in doubt, keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWHOSWHO||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: The list might have been spun out of the main article simply so it doesn't have -weight on the overall article.   There are other instances of lists which come to mind such as the U.S. (presidential) inauguration guest lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Notability is not inherited () and as DQ has stated: . Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: the wedding itself may be notable, but the full recital of the guest-list is not -- it is blatantly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: This is not an appropriate list for an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is |not a directory. The list includes some notable people and many utterly |nonnotable people, who |cannot inherit notability by turning up on a guest list for some trivial reason (friend of a friend, or whatever). Wikipedia is NEWS|not a newspaper, and does not always mirror all information which is covered in newspapers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BIO||WP:NOT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per WP:NOTDIR,  etc. Unencyclopaedic trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Seems to lack independent notability, and trangresses #DIRECTORY and #NEWS. Serious thought should be given at the Royal Wedding page as to whose attendance is notable and whose is not; this is not the same as which attendees are notable. Note that most highly significant scheduled events (say the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony or the 2010 Oscars) are attended by numerous notable people, and many of them may receive press coverage while doing so (there are whole shows devoted to the Oscars' red carpet entrances, but these do not magically make them significant
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: If the list is kept, what ontological purpose will it serve except to show who still tugs their forelocks? Royaltycruft, as per above. WP:NOTDIR, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)