Deletion of Higher-Order Perl

Comment: Thanks go to Cunard for researching sources and to MarkZusab for adding them. The ACM Computing Reviews, Linux Journal, Dr. Dobbs and Prague Bulletin are all reliable sources. The Unix Review, mentioned by Mark Dominus above, is also reliable. While none of these reviews are long, they show impact and provide enough verifiable content to write a well-sourced stub on the book. Multiple independent reliable sources with enough depth to write an article show notability per . A notable book and an article with no major problems suggests keeping the article. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per nominator.  Writing a single book doesn't meet notability guidelines.  Wikipedia is not Amazon, and we should not have an article for every book mentioned on Amazon.  This fails as per , Wikipedia is not a commercial website for book advertisement, and that's all this article is used for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLUG)

Comment: The subject of the article meets  / , which is shown by Cunard's sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK)