Deletion of Chaldean's

Comment: I could overlook the fact that this is poorly written, prefaced with a POV rant, and  ''the title uses the possessive case''.  These are editorial concerns.  The rest of the article though is duplication of Chaldea, blatent copyright violations of images, |original research...  because much of the article is not sourced by the sources listed in the article... and it ends with more unsourced POV.  Based on that, this should be deleted.  The only thing I'm curious about is why this was brought to AfD when it already was PROD'd 3 days ago and as far as I can tell the PROD was not disputed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)