Deletion of Bob Tuke

Comment: per . The fact that he received coverage in multiple feature articles in reliable sources in separate instances as the party chairman and a senate candidate gives him the required notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: As always, unelected candidates for office are not handed an automatic inclusion freebie just for having their name on the ballot — they have to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to be presumed notable as a politician. But this makes no other strong claim of preexisting notability for other reasons that would have gotten him an article independently of his candidacy. And no, the fact that some degree of campaign coverage exists does ''not'' get a candidate over  all by itself, as Teemu08 wrongly claims above, because ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''everywhere'' can ''always'' show some degree of campaign coverage — to make a candidate notable on pure GNG grounds without winning the election first or having standing prior notability for other reasons, the campaign coverage has to explode to a degree ''way'' out of proportion with what other candidates could also show, as in Christine O'Donnell or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. But this isn't showing any evidence that Tuke's candidacy is anywhere near that high bar of specialness
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: One of three refs has been re-purposed; I deleted the ref. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)