Deletion of TL;DR

Comment: The term is not only covered in dictionaries, it is also covered in enough reliable sources to meet  (see ). However, the article should be expanded to include some more information that would not be appropriate to be put in a dictionary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WORDISSUBJECT)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: It has over 300 "What links here", including 20 on dministrators Noticeboard. Essential WP jargon, and we need somewhere to link to, for editors who don't know it. –&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: per nom, although I find it a ''shame'' that we don't have a "List of internet slang" article that this could be merged to.  There is definitely a place for such discourse on Wikipedia, but TL;DR doesn't deserve its own article per , and (as someone above mentioned) this would never get past the stub phase.--Esprit15d
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDICTIONARY)

Comment: per . And expand. Given the usage on internet, it won't remain just a dictdef stub if given some editing hours
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)