Deletion of Jonathan Higgins (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets  notability with significant coverage in reliable sources, as demonstrated by Peregrine Fisher
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Then , which I'm sure you already knew, and doesn't diminish the point.  And this isn't a .  It is supposed to be a discussion.  Anyone can make a Tshirt that says anything and offer it for sale with CafePress or SpreadShirt, and it costs $0 to do so.  I could make one that says "Dennis Brown is Notable", but that is not evidence that I should have an article here. The main point is that in order for the article to exist on Wikipedia, those requesting delete do not have to prove anything, it is upon the people wanting to keep the article to demonstrate it meets the criteria for inclusion.  That is how AFD works and always has.  At this point, I still haven't seen anyone demonstrate that the character has had significant coverage by any |reliable 3rd party, only incidental coverage when discussing the show and/or actor himself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:VOTE||WP:RS)

Comment: More than notable. There were many camera interviews conducted in the 1980s of Hillerman focusing on Higgins. Unfortunately, much of that video does not show up on Google. A Google search is not the end all be all. See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BURO)