Deletion of Beatnik (programming language)

Comment: Your first argument is invalid – this article has been rewritten and its deletion history has nothing to do to with its present notability. And Google or other search engines don't return nothing. I can talk about the outline of sources, but let's keep the discussion objective. I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3ABeatnik_%28programming_language%29&type=revision&diff=711540887&oldid=593720861 worked hard to improve this article to fit these criteria and it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beatnik_%28programming_language%29&diff=711680368&oldid=711656189 passed the |Articles for Creation https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beatnik_%28programming_language%29&diff=711656189&oldid=711655856 submission ({{ping|Hasteur|Anarchyte}}). We have 3 independent sources on this, so I would recommend to '''Keep'''. Here's the list of present sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)

Comment: ping|Tigraan|Ruud Koot}} But if we merge this article into Esoteric programming language, it could become {{tl|Too long}}. I know that it won't exceed the , but code samples don't count in the prose-size and they appears often in programming-related articles. There's nothing wrong with leaving good-referenced stubs here, IMO
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZERULE)

Comment: You don't have to repeat your own vote, and moreover written uppercase. And '''it is notable''' as you can see above your last comments, that's why I asked you for some arguments. Well, I can provide some counterarguments, after I have read yours {{smiley}}. There's no simple way to determine, if some lang is useful or not, if a large number of them are Turing complete.  Some of them are usable to code a kernel, some are suitable for SQL queries. But when we talk about the '''esoteric''', not just a programming languages, their purposes obviously change. As you can read in the Esoteric_programming_language#Cultural_context_of_esolangs|Esoteric programming language § Cultural context of esolangs, esolangs can be considered as code art and code poetry. The Art is not always useful, it's just art and may impress someone, that's why it exists. And IMO Beatnik is interesting and unique enough, to deliver its existence to readers in that way. Programming languages consist of things with a wide variety of usage. And Wikipedia should cover this outline, not just the small part, which let you code a business app or a next game. And I agree with you that not every part of the Internet should be sucked into the Wikipedia as it's not a , but this topic is significantly different, it's not a simple  from some place on the Internet. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WEBHOST||WP:COPYPASTE)