Deletion of Camp Ramah (2nd nomination)

Comment: Well sourced article , clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Cow Of Pain.  There is no need for a separate article on each individual camp.  Certainly, a list of such camps can be included in the main article, and maybe an extra sentence or two if that particular camp has some unique feature.  Otherwise, the individual camp articles are going to be nearly identical, and mostly redundant to the main article.  The franchise is notable, but the individual camps fail .  Note that previous AfD's for individual camps have resulted in deletion, and the articles have been (inappropriately) recreated since
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: because this nomination, that seeks to destroy articles that collectively fulfill both , that do not violate , and that comply fully with  and ''adequate''  are an entire well-established ''network'' of '''Jewish summer camps''', that would in effect wipe out and disable the entire :Category:Camp Ramah that would require that this category be now placed up for deletion at  as well (so this is in effect not a good faith nomination that is defective as it stands), which in turn this is a sub-category of :Category:Jewish summer camps, that in turn are (sub-)sub-categories of both :Category:Jewish educational organizations and :Category:Jewish youth organizations, that in turn are sub-sub-categories of the parent categories :Category:Jewish organizations and :Category:Jewish education and much more in this category field. So the nomination simply creates a gaping hole and opens the door that every last Jewish summer camp's article will face deletion, that then defeats the purpose of writing a serious and comprehensive encyclopedia. Much work has gone into creating and building up these important articles over the years that are a pillar of Jewish education in North America and beyond. The articles may need some work, and perhaps start from some standard promotional material, but that does not make them hopeless as the nominator falsely alleges, since that's is not much different to tens of thousands of articles all over that have the same starting points but over time develop into key components of a much larger whole that many not familiar with this field of Jewish education often cannot fathom. The nominator is requested to withdraw this damaging, sweeping and defective AfD that could cause much harm and undo much work that has gone into these articles over many years. Perhaps staring a centralized discussion at  about how to improve the articles would be a better, more productive and incremental, and less provocative place to start. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:CITE||WP:CFD||WP:TALKJUDAISM)