Deletion of Wind turbine syndrome

Comment: I'm not finding the reliable sources that might show that this topic has received general attention. Certainly 'Wind turbine syndrome' should not be the title unless  is satisfied, but if there were enough sources to show it could be neutrally covered, the material could be referenced in some other article. I'm not seeing coverage in mainstream media such as newspapers. It looks to me that the citations are nearly all to activist web sites. The closing admin should look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Grandma Moe before doing any vote counting. This debate was mentioned at the onflict of interest/Noticeboard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:C)

Comment: and revert recent |original research and |POV edits to e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wind_turbine_syndrome&oldid=284962777 this edit.  Whether it should remain as a separate article, or be merged with wind turbine, is another question, but the phenomenon of people attributing health problems to wind turbines is itself fairly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per , coi, NOTVOTE,  ect... Not sure how discussion got this far
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:RS)

Comment: non-notable |fringe theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)