Deletion of Christopher Shale

Comment: chairman of the West Oxfordshire constituency association and political aide fails  and all the additional coverage is related to the death circumstances, but we don't include people notable only for one event or lacking substantial coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Not notable in his own right. His death, sad as it is, does not appear to be a notable event (natural causes and no apparent significant political consequences) and fails . It may be worth a sentence in the Glastonbury 2011 article and perhaps the David Cameron article (although I suspect in the context of those articles the event may not seem particularly notable). Probably no need to keep this as a redirect to one of those articles. At this time it seems unlikely to be a common search
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The sad circumstances of Shale's death has generated significant media coverage (google news lists over 1200 articles), coupled with the issue of the leaked 'strategy document' which was released days before he passed away. Whether he would have warranted an article had he not died is questionable, but it seems very clear to me that the circumstances of his death are clearly notable, especially considering no formal cause of death has been listed. If the Giant Snowman is concerned that the person himself is not notable, it could perhaps be moved to a page called Death of Christopher Shale, but I would imagine that this page would have to become a redirect anyway. He may have only been a local politician, but influential and notable due to his links to Cameron. If his strategy report was notable enough to cause a stir in the Mail on Sunday before his death was ever made public, surely this means the whole () charge is slightly absurd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)