Deletion of Jannali East Public School (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom. Among other issues has  problems even before we get to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I really get fed up with AfDs that don't have any facts put to them. A bit of research wouldn't go astray here, rather than "not notable" assertions without any reason whatsoever which seem to be the norm on AfDs nowadays. Despite WP:SCHOOLS not being policy, it is persuasive, and we should take note of the criteria there. A search on some newspaper databases brings up a note in the Sydney Morning Herald in March 2006 about the school celebrating its 50th anniversary on June 16 2006. A look at WP:SCHOOLS shows that schools over 50 years old, for which this is now applicable, have been declared as verifiable. Precedent for public primary schools has kept schools that are over 50 years old. Another mention from 1999 (21 July 1999, "Schools told: stop saving for a rainy day" indicates that the school was in serious financial trouble under the Carr Government's education policy which left the school at one stage with only $5000 in its bank accounts. I'm happy to look for more articles if you want, but I think there's more to this article than most people think, but no one can be bothered taking a look. Even if the article is not verifiable still, there is worth in merging the environment stuff and financial problems in the late 1990s to Jannali, New South Wales as per . So how about it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL)

Comment: No one has shown any strong violation of |the sock policy by these nominations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)