Deletion of Frank tamborello

Comment: #Caveats says the criteria vary greatly by field. He seems to matter to his small community of cognitive architecture researchers. See for example the http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/ ACT-R website and the http://chil.rice.edu/ Computer-Human Interaction Lab website. These indicate that he's published multiple papers in multiple refereed conferences, which is fine for some fields. Also, "Don't rely just on Google Scholar, it is dicey." #Citation_metrics  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The arguments in support of keeping this article have clearly missed the spirit of .  Furthermore, I'm a grad student in cognitive psychology and so I am familiar with the ACT-R community and the conferences its members attend.  Let's go through the guidelines here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: per nominator. Citation counts in Google scholar are far too low to pass #C1 and what else is there? A typical example of an article created too early in an academic's career, before they have had time to make an impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)