Deletion of Iran and Red and black colonization

Comment: The article should be kept because it clearly passes . The main logic behind this AFD, as the nominator says, is that {{tq|"one or two lines in a book is not enough to warrant an article."}} So, let's see the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as the article makes little sense in its current form. As a native english speaker, it is so full of poor grammar that it is hard to know what it is actually saying. At the very least, it needs a dose of . As for its notability, having looked at the claim of "a chapter of the Simon and Schuster book" (link provided in the sources listed above) very little is about the newspaper article which is the subject of the Wikipedia article; it is about early activities of the revolution. As the nominator specifies, these are brief mentions.  All of the important information here can be found in the Iranian Revolution article, where it belongs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)