Deletion of Honorific titles in popular music

Comment: Have been following this with interest since my earlier Weak Delete !vote - and as some people are asking for justification from the delete voters:  I'm still concerned that this format of article is stuck between  (if editors are making value judgements about who's in or out) and an ever extending list - in WP policy terms falling under  #Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations (Artist from genre 'x' who at some stage was called honorific 'y').  The 'King' thing is tending to confuse the debate, but its similar to trying to have a "Movie of the Year 2007" page and including anything that got called that in a review.  Having a page for "Oscar winners 2007", which is clearly defined, works; having page for "Highest grossing movies 2007" works (again verifiable and easily defined list) but just pulling out any film that got called "movie of the year" in a review, or making value judgements about how many times it got called it doesn't, as far as encyclopaedic rather than interesting content is concerned
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Which specific #REASON|deletion reason(s) apply to this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)