Deletion of Adrian Scarlat

Comment: GS citations don't make rof#C1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: This person is not notable under conventional thresholds of . As the subject is an engineer, WoS probably gives a better assessment of his research work. A targeted query ("AUTHOR: (scarlat a*) Refined by: RESEARCH AREAS: (CONSTRUCTION BUILDING TECHNOLOGY OR ENGINEERING) Timespan: All years. Search language=Auto") shows 8 papers with citation counts: 3, 1, 1, 0, 0, ... As for books, WorldCat shows his "Approximate methods in structural seismic design" is held by ~150 institutions and that he has several other books in the Romanian language, whose holdings are in the single digits. Finally, we do not conventionally accept "trivial mentions" and such, even in mainstream periodicals, as demonstration of notability. Unless there's something else we're missing, this analysis seems fairly conclusive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Person is accomplished, and is a working engineer. Simply not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass , and as been pointed out by other editors, their scholarly work doesn't rise to the level of passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SCHOLAR)