Deletion of Town Managers of Saugus Massachusetts

Comment: meets , unable to find a reason not to include from links cited by other !voters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: on numerous grounds.  First off, the article plainly fails  going away.  Secondly, |notability is not inherited.  Thirdly, the article absolutely falls far under the threshold set by  for notability; the appointed individuals managing small state or provincial cities just don't cut it, when the threshold is "Generally, a person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians. A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:N||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Didn't even consider  when I nominated the article, but good point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE)

Comment: GEOSCOPE? POLITICIAN? each town manager not fulfill criteria of WP:BIO requires the article to be deleted rather than deciding whether the manager's name should be listed in the article? Really? notability is not inherited? not inherited from what? The article is about the chief administrative manager position in Saugus, Massachusetts. The article sources at present go from 1947, 1950, 1952 all the way to 2012 and are sufficient in themselves to meet . Hirolovesswords' cites above are sufficient for the topic to meet . In news articles only having the topic in their name, the topic meets  as having sufficient coverage for a stand alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Uza Gamal asked about the relevance of  here. It says "An event affecting a local area and reported only by the media within the immediate region may not necessarily be notable. Coverage of an event nationally or internationally makes notability more likely, but does not automatically assure it" Now, this article lacks any national or international coverage (despite claims of "substantial coverage"). So we are left with only local coverage. Of a topic not notable, and article that doesn't meet . And, for the record, why don't you read  closely ''and'' carefully. Because I am glad you mentioned it as it reiterates ''why'' this article doesn't belong on Wikipedia but I am not sure if you understand the rationale of my nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: The Boston Globe articles "Saugus has a great tradition... can he manage to end it?", "Saugus Gets 12th Manager in 14 Years", "Saugus Elects Town Manager", and the books "Modernizing local government in Massachusetts" and "An Analysis of Tenure and Termination of Town Managers in Saugus, Massachusetts" do discuss the subject in significant detail and meet  requirements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)