Deletion of Interactivography

Comment: Unsourced |neologism that has no documented use aside from the guy who coined it. Utterly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Doesn't appear to be a company, but ''does'' appear to be a non-notable |neologism, |made up by a guy writing a blog last week to describe his own personal take on the art of video game creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Poorly sourced neologism, an obvious example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Wouldn't a merge require a |reliable source to indicate that anyone other than the single blog author has ever used this term
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per . (And isn't this just "interactivity" as applied to video games
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)