Deletion of Omroep Zeeland

Comment: 1 The length of an article should not be a criterium for deletion. It seems to be a criterium here. 2 Per  it doesn't matter if there are sufficient references in the article or not. It only matters if valid sources exist. 3 Nominator evidently did not do a  as he refers only to what is in the article and on nl.wiki. He seems confused about what a broadcaster is. This is reason to speedy the keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The article has been expanded and looks much better https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Omroep_Zeeland&oldid=941901859 than before. Some of the expansion is routine business trivia or sourced to the subject, but some is better and sourced to independent sources. It's much more borderline now. My main concern is that there are still no in-depth sources about the company, some coverage of incidents it was involved in like getting their website hacked or one of their employees causing a scandal is problematic since it is not, well, ''in-depth''. , after all. Let's see what others think
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: What gives you the idea that this independent broadcaster is part of the Nederlandse Publieke Omroep (organization)??? Clearly, not a proper  was done
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)