Deletion of Travelzoo (2nd nomination)

Comment: It certainly ''seems'' to be a notabile company.  A quick book search reveals a few sources about the company itself (http://books.google.com/books?id=dJomGlPLjF0C&pg=PA159&lpg=PA159&dq=travelzoo&source=bl&ots=Gx2sQiLvAH&sig=dEsv5laNJmPng4wGeJbQDAjsLpg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lHh8UO7KIJG6qQHgqICACA&ved=0CE0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=travelzoo&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=6uO25wByWrQC&pg=PT98&lpg=PT98&dq=travelzoo&source=bl&ots=ZEvvyb7xOx&sig=bfdJes-B1lDZJLuW_iFAU6V1MFY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lHh8UO7KIJG6qQHgqICACA&ved=0CFQQ6AEwBAhttp://books.google.com/books?id=Yy7VPq6NBswC&pg=PA141&lpg=PA141&dq=travelzoo&source=bl&ots=WZ9OTBJ5P8&sig=mZaDkD46Uu5Mzn0oSILGlB3MCBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lHh8UO7KIJG6qQHgqICACA&ved=0CFkQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=travelzoo&f=false) as well as some attention paid to their odd "free shares" promotion (http://books.google.com/books?id=fwcEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=travelzoo&source=bl&ots=DZScVVxz3a&sig=d1r2oRmu8c9-ZZ8bQxD1UEy-VnQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lHh8UO7KIJG6qQHgqICACA&ved=0CF8Q6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=travelzoo&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=S4r5INmK6gkC&pg=PT78&lpg=PT78&dq=travelzoo&source=bl&ots=pakVxTMgte&sig=0XrFZcgdYhp01SgMQ1L6HUgF2dQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lHh8UO7KIJG6qQHgqICACA&ved=0CGgQ6AEwCA), plus plenty of followup (both about the company and its sometimes colorful stock history) in periodicals.  The current article doesn't have any of those things (and is basically a promotional piece), but this is able.  I've bailed more than a few articles out of the AFD dock, but I have got to pass the torch to someone else on this one; I have two articles in my personal incubator right now, and a week-long trip-mandated Wikibreak coming up fast, which won't end until after this AFD closes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: significant coverage in secondary sources. Also, . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)