Deletion of Impax Asset Management Group

Comment: while the article has been expanded recently, a lot of it is {particularly the History section) is opinioned trivia or puffery; what this journalist thought, what that person noted, what that employee did outside of the organisation etc, and not a lot of stating what it does and how it is notable. Asset managers can have a large net work due to the value of the assets under management, but aside from periodically buying and selling assets, they don't do much, hence are rarely |notable enough for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability as they rely on company announcement and interviews, topic therefore fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: updates by Dormskirk seem to indicate that the subject of the article meets  'is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)