Deletion of Bhagwan Shri Krishna

Comment: Per nom. While a |search can be location biased Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball and if there are sources "out there" then |proof needs to be offered. IMDb is not a reliable source (See: , , and /IMDB), and creating articles then one day (maybe) in the future finding sources is backward to the intent of Wikipedia . I am not opposed to recreation if sources are presented.  states: {{tq|Wikipedia articles are not a final draft, and an article's subject can be notable if such sources exist, even if they have not been named yet. If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate. '''However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:PROVEIT||WP:ELP||WP:RSPS||WP:RS||WP:NEXIST||WP:policies and guidelines)