Deletion of The Gnostic Movement Incorporated

Comment: in addition to , also fails notability, neutral POV, what Wikipedia is not (i.e., not a soapbox), verifiability and possibly vanity standard (see , , , , AIN). Fix each of these problems and use reliable sources () -- I'll be happy to switch my recommendation to "keep". I don't have a personal POV on Gnosticism-related articles (does that make me agnostic on gnosticism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:NN||WP:V||WP:VAIN||WP:RS)