Deletion of Deez Nuts (candidate)

Comment: Agree w/ davidwr above. Clearly passes , and there is precedent for articles on satirical or "unconventional" candidates (e.g. Pigasus (politics), Vermin Supreme
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: In-depth coverage in http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/20/deez-nuts-independent-2016-candidate The Guardian, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/deez-nuts-is-running-for-president/ CBS News, http://time.com/4004520/deez-nuts-candidate-2016/ TIME magazine, and http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/meet-deez-nuts-the-teen-presidential-candidate-punking-america-20150819 Rolling Stone overwhelmingly establishes |general notability. The fact that the candidacy is not serious is not a deletion rationale, nor is the assertion that |this information is not relevant to an encyclopedia. Content concerns should be addressed at Talk:Deez Nuts (candidate)|the article's talk page. As davidwr points out, ONEEVENT may make a move appropriate in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BELONG)