Deletion of CareCloud

Comment: and Merge appropriate content to MTBC. The references in the article fail  as they are based on company announcements and/or interviews with company officers
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Just because an article is about a corporation does not make it "" or . The Boston Globe article linked in the article http://archive.is/pRafj is in-depth, independent, reliable, and a secondary source. I've also found this PCMag review of the software https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/carecloud which satisfies the above criteria as well. These are multiple sources that satisfy the conditions of . If keep isn't an option this article should be merged instead into MTBC of which CareCloud is a subsidiary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ADMASK||WP:MILL||WP:NCORP)

Comment: agreed that just because an article is a company does not automatically make it "" or . It's time that editors start realizing that and really go into the sources and assess whether an article is notable or not. The acquisition is significant and I do think it warrants its own page given its notable company history. That being said, the "awards" section here is completely unnecessary (and outdated since the company no longer exists). If that section is rid of, I support Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ADMASK||WP:MILL)

Comment: as per nom. Fails . Pure  case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ADMASK)