Deletion of Eastern Hills High School

Comment: per . Poorly written is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I have now added the necessary multiple references to meet . Further expansion is needed but that is the way with stubs. Since this is a discussion, not a vote, the deleters need to argue why the combination of references do not meet  for their !votes to be valid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Can people stop quoting  in cases where there is no apparent notability? That page is just a "scorecard" of what ''has'' happened. Not what ''should'' happen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: There is no consensus, as the lack of a sorely needed WP:SCHOOL policy should be a hint of. And wp:outcomes is really a pathetic reason, much worse than wp:otherstuff (of which it is basically a grand generalisation). No, the reason ''not to keep'' is that '''"#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory|wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of yellow pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: based on the excellent work by TerriersFan, this now meets  and invalidates many previous comments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: High schools are notable per  as  indicates
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS||WP:OUTCOMES)