Deletion of Andy Iro

Comment: I'd say your comment is a perfect example of |crystal balling.  '''If''' he makes an appearance for Columbus then the article can be undeleted.  At the moment, all we can say is that he has potential, but potential does not confer notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: By the letter of the law, does he pass Wikipedia's notability guideline? Maybe, maybe not. But Columbus plays their first game of the season in exactly two weeks. He will almost certainly get on the field, if not be in the starting eleven. I don't think we ought to delete something on a technicality when it is just going to recreated a couple weeks later. Perfect example of when to |use common sense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: per .  See http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=SPORTS&ID=565073794079785013&Archive=true here (reg req), http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=KZSB&ID=564838653210263652&Archive=true here (reg req), http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=ARCHIVESW&ID=564289859469049938&Archive=true here (reg req), http://www.soccercityfc.com/2008/01/technical-sessions-andy-iro-is-keeping.html here, http://www.dailynexus.com/article.php?a=9870 here, http://www.ksby.com/Global/story.asp?s=7744455 here etc.  Also, '''someone explain my previous question posted right about this before deletion''' please kthanks.  In before "Note that past AfD closures made prior to the development of these criteria (5/2/2008) cannot be used as precedents for keeping articles" as my talk page clearly shows that myself and
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)