Deletion of Chi Sigma Xi

Comment: The question of whether this is a branch of a national organization or a standalone local entity is not as definitive in this instance as the total lack of any |reliable source coverage independent of the organization's own |self-published web presence. The "referencing" here is entirely to the sorority's own webpage about itself and its own social networking profile on Facebook, except for one article in the university's ''student'' newspaper — a source which is not widely distributed enough, or archived anywhere that Wikipedia could ''retrieve'' the content again if the weblink dies, to count for anything toward . But that's not how an organization gets a Wikipedia article, ''regardless'' of where it falls on the "national branch vs. standalone" scale: the key to getting a Wikipedia article is reliable source coverage in ''general'' market media on the order of ''daily'' newspapers and/or ''national'' news organizations (i.e. CBC/Global/CTV/Canadian Press), of which none has been shown here and no evidence of adequate coverage is turning up on Google either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:GNG)

Comment: The rule of thumb is that single-chapter Greek-letter organizations are not notable. I don't see anything to make this an exception. I also don't see substantial coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)