Deletion of Is it a good idea to microwave this

Comment: The references appear to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Has a notability factor, references could be improved, and all in all, it's an article that is worth keeping. Also, the references should meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: If Chad_Vader and Smosh can have their own wikipedia page with most of the references being their own videos, and the rest being unreliable as per , then Is It A Good Idea To Microwave This can also have their own article. Smosh has one article where the one mention of them is that they had one an award a for best comedy video at the youtube awards, and Chad Vader has no reliable sources. However, Smosh has only been challenged 3 times by an AFD request. Once it was kept, twice the request was withdrawn. And Chad Vader has never had an AFD request put on it. If we hold one article to the , then must we not hold them all to the same standard, which would result in the deletion of most of the List of YouTube celebrities's articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)

Comment: The Boston Herald source does not constitute significant coverage, and the other sources are not reliable as per . Arguments from those voting to keep fall mostly under  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: fails the |general notability guideline. Doesn't appear to be the subject of ''several'' reliable publications independent of the subject itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The references seem to meet  with its Boston Herald and Tube Filter articles on the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Where's the |beef
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: ndash;  Nicely done ConCompS.  Let's all remember what this page is for, it is to determine if the article meets Wikipedia criteria for inclusion.  It is not for a prolonged discussion of the criteria for inclusion.  Cm0n3y34, you are more then welcome to argue that changes be made to the criteria, but they are better placed on the  |criteria page than here.  Including such discussion here only hides it from those that might agree with your comments and does not contribute to the original intent of this page.  Additionally, it makes it harder for the reviewing admin to focus on the points made to save the article.  Thanks everyone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)