Deletion of College dating

Comment: per Piotrus and  SENSE. This is the subject of thousands of books and it is a bit unfair to AFD an article that is actively under construction
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMON)

Comment: The arguments above, if they can be called such, provide no citations at all. Beyond simply being an , the reference to GHITS is particularly spurious. There are millions of GHITS for "cold water", and yet the characteristics of water of varying temperatures can be adequately addressed at water with no need for a fork. Nobody has suggested that there is any benefit to the inclusion of more on the sub-topic of "college dating" than can be reasonably accommodated at the dating page. Outside of OR, there is no more than a sentence on the actual topic in the current article, so there's absolutely no justification for anything other than a redirect (if that) pending someone wishing to provide encyclopedic coverage of this topic
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: Per Pitorus I would remind the nom not to  newbies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)