Deletion of Notable guests of the Late Show

Comment: per above.  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Wow, first time I've used that.  Clearly this material would be important to anybody interested in the ''Late Show'' and should be included with that article.  (However, if it violates  or is stylistically awkward to include it there, it should be '''kept'''.)  #DIR doesn't seem to apply here; this isn't just a list of guests - it actually has content describing why the appearance was significant to the show.  As part of the main ''Late Night'' article, this should be covered under 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE||WP:NOT||WP:NNC)

Comment: these aren't notable ''guests'', they're memorable ''incidents''. For those that, unlike Madonna on Letterman, didn't get significant media coverage, it's hard to see this as anything other than . I don't necessarily disagree with the inclusion of anything here, but what's the standard--one editor's opinion? I see it's intended as a split from the main article for the show. Beacuase of that, I can see some value in it, but overall it's hard to justify it without some criterion in lieu of extensive media coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: all |verifiable, |sourced information to The Late Show
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)