Deletion of Pulsion technology

Comment: The issue is not whether the references establish notability, but whether notability can be established () and editors are expected to search for sources before nominating an article for deletion (). A Google News archive search appears to show several articles in the Glasgow Herald about the company, which look like they should be enough to establish notability; alas, they're paywalled so I can't read them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Per the ''availability'' of sources, not just those currently in the article. (Also, sources are |''not'' required to be available online
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCEACCESS)

Comment: based on what's in the article: there is plenty to show notability, but |even more so which what is available, per Northamerica1000 and Mark Arsten
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)