Deletion of 330 (number)

Comment: My fisrt instinct was that the author is probly trying to make the  that their shouldn't be any articles on numbers at all, hoping to create a slippery slope that will lead to teh deletion of number articles like 47, 163, 1729, etc. According to #Before creating a new article, the author shold've looked at 300 (number) to see if it said anything about 330. Next, he or she should've tried to see if e could round up three interesting properties.  is one proposed yardstick of whats an intersting prop, with the scoring as follows
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:NUM||WP:1729)