Deletion of Charles Mickle (golfer) (2nd nomination)

Comment: ndash; Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance.  The "award" is as noted above is "...less of an award and more of a qualification level for coaching."  For the same reason we do not include a PhD without any Wikipedia based |notability, this "award" does not qualify as a notable achievement &ndash; as least as defined by Wikipedia.  As also pointed out the |burden of proof rests with the author of the article.  It appears to me the only thing obvious is the article lacks independent, | verifiable, |reliable sources that support Wikipedia based notability in either  or  and the keep comments '''are not''' based on Wikipedia guidelines.  A note to 92.223.51.226, please do not make |uncivil comments about personal vendetta's.  I see no evidence of anyone having an agenda and your comments only serve to cloud the real issue at hand &ndash; is the article subject notable based on Wikipedia criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BURDEN||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:ATHLETE||WP:UNCIVIL)

Comment: There is no evidence!  |Reliable sources are needed, not just assertions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)