Deletion of IDonate Pakistan

Comment: based on the article as it is now but I hope additional reliable independent sources are added before this closes.  To the closing admin:  If the references improve significantly between my last edit of this AfD and its close, please give my opinion less weight than if no such improvement occurs.  If there is not enough improvement to demonstrate notability, I would be open to |userfication now or at any point in the future if (and only if) the primary author or another editor states he will either improve the article and submit it through |Articles for creation or a similar process or ask to have it deleted within a month of userfication
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY||WP:AFC)

Comment: Well yes we need to aware of  and I am usually the first to say a source in Pakistan (or India) can be worth many in other countries (see relevant ). But I look at this organization and wonder. It is only two years old, a single office, has 15 employees - this is a tiny barely established NGO. Per  it probably would not pass. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMIC||WP:INDAFD||WP:NGO||WP:TOOSOON)