Deletion of Women's Post

Comment: Don't forget about http://www.marketingmag.ca/english/news/media/article.jsp?content=20080718_142333_7432 this. The article clearly meets the |notability guideline, considering that it has significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The comments made above about the article being a campaign promotion would only hold water if the sources were from information directly related to the campaign. Two of them are, yes, but the others and the one I just gave are not, so the promotion argument doesn't stand. Thus, the subject of the article is notable and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: at this point.  The references in the article (especially http://www.mediaincanada.com/articles/mic/20080717/womenspost.html this), have significant coverage of the publication, and a Google News search returns about 15 results that mention it.  Probably enough to satisfy the |general notability guideline&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)