Deletion of Battle of Hulao Pass

Comment: I saw that too. I think this runs back into any adaptation (novel, game, film, comic, live theatre) of a fictional work. Yes, a new adaptation means that every aspect of a fiction's characters, locations, and events now appear in the original AND the adaptation. I don't think that more primary material confers any additional notability to any of the fiction's disparate elements, nor does it give you the kind of sources you'd need to create an encyclopedic article. But I support having articles about the adaptations (games, theatre productions) themselves, and summarizing the fictional details that appear in those adaptations. I also support a check for references in other languages, which could result in an . (But doesn't as of yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: granted, this is from one of the most notable works of fiction. But notability is  and there's no sources to write something verifiable with real world context. Battle is already covered at List_of_fictitious_stories_in_Romance_of_the_Three_Kingdoms#Battle_of_Hulao_Pass and would be an acceptable redirect target
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)