Deletion of Liz White (politician) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Given that literally every mayor of a village with only 10 adult citizens counts as a politician, I would argue that '''any''' Article whose title actually requires "(politician)" in parentheses is '''not''' otability|notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: notable under . Contains third party sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Leader of a noteworthy minor political party and passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: with Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada. The "Political history" section at least is sourced, noteworthy background that would improve another article, so outright deletion is a non-starter. Thing is, I don't see the "meets GNG" argument. (It seems there's general agreement that  definitely isn't met, so GNG is the way forward here.) I was about to explain why none of the references currently in the article really help to establish notability, but Valenciano's already said everything I was going to. I tried looking for more online, but not much came up - http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/593285 this was about the high point I'm afraid
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)