Deletion of Alessandro Strumia

Comment: meets  easily, though article certainly needs work. There's https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20180607a/full/ coverage and https://www.wired.it/scienza/lab/2016/11/24/bosone-higgs-ipotesi-natura/ in https://www.focus.it/scienza/scienze/fisica-modello-standard-le-particelle-nel-bosone-di-higgs italian of his research; Per Scientific American he's a https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-physics-complications-lend-support-to-multiverse-hypothesis/ notable proponent of an unorthodox theory in particle physics. There's a paragraph in ''The New York Times'' on  https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/science/25neutrinos.html his research. All demonstrating #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: per  - looks like several people have chipped in to help expand the article to show there's more than just the one-off news event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: While the article does seem to be 90% focused on  controversy, he may pass . His https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=CINl2I0AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra Google Scholar profile shows many citations, through his work is co-authored, and it is far from my field of sociology, so I am not sure what are the citation standards/etc. in that field
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NPROF)

Comment: The article's lede may fail to point promptly enough to its subject notability, but the entry fulfills all the BLP's necessary . The nature of the controversy and its coverage are both significant. The scholar's publication record also validates its inclusion in WP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: He seems to meet ; a Senior Researcher at the National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics with a multitude of publications. The recent incident seems unduly heavy in his entry, however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Apart from the controversy, he seems to pass . The controversy itself is part of a wider controversy that is purely political and is at odds with the actual science. For that reason, the controversy has legs, and will retain some notability for a long time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Not obvious that it is a net pass off . Can someone spell it out clearly? I mean... don't forget that some Nobel Prize winner's page has been deleted on that ground. Just sayin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Strumia is a physicist who gave a single pseudoscientific presentation on gender, misleading the event organisers, flouting rules of the event hosts, violating the code of conduct of his funding body and deliberately insulting his audience. It would have been strange if he were ''not'' suspended. The event may have been newsworthy at the time, but it doesn't make the individual notable (). It certainly doesn't warrant a detailed outline of the talk, or a bio presenting him as if these ideas are of scientific merit. Sometimes scientists make incompetent and unfortunate forays into topics well outside their expertise. Wikipedia doesn't exist to document these. If this event has repercussions beyond one news cycle and the repercussions for one individual, I would support a page on the event itself provided it accords with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Is that ''canvassing'' in any meaningful sense? It basically just says that this page exists. It doesn't tell readers to come here and participate; in general, it doesn't make participating in Wikipedia sound very enjoyable at all. (It says that our article "contains scant third-party references to why his research is significant." As the editor who added https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alessandro_Strumia&type=revision&diff=862194657&oldid=862191721 some of those references, I'd tend to agree. That's what happens when the press covers a researcher as one member of a collaboration.) Anyway, we've been here for a week, and the consensus looks like a pass of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)