Deletion of Comparison of Windows and Linux (3rd nomination)

Comment: The topic is notable, but the article is  in spades, and uses hardly any sources that make such a comparison themselves. If someone finds this page useful as basis for a remotely policy compliant article, they should ask the closing admin to userfy the material to themselves or to a suitable WikiProject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The article appears to be a  and  nightmare, and when you strip away all of this, what little is left is suitable for Comparison of operating systems, but doesn't warrant enough for a separate article.  The comparison of Windows and Linux has been discussed by media, yes.  However, this makes the subject notable within the context of a relevant article, not a synthesized mishmash of different viewpoints comparing a recent reference on one side with a years old reference on the other
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: I switched my opinion and have deleted my arguments and with them IRWolfie's rebuttals. I archived this discussion on the talk page, if IRWolfie should want to reiterate it). Reason for switching to '''delete''': It is apparent that this page will continue to be misused for petty rants and  attempts at spreading fear, uncertainty and doubts. I still consider the topic '''worthy of notice''' but keeping it clean is unrealistic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: and '''burn with fire''' - Comparison articles have no place on Wikipedia., 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:NOTCATALOG)