Deletion of Helen Goddard

Comment: and Rename as Conviction of Helen Goddard. Sufficiently notable because of the amount of International coverage and debate her conviction has generated. Goddard is now unlikley to work as a musician again so no point in a Biography.Incidently The Times and The BBC are the best  there is, for current affairs and hardly "regurgitated tabloid fodder"!?? Like it or not Goddard is a household name in the UK for her 'crimes'. The case has been reported in over 175 international news sources and appears in media around the globe http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&q=Helen%20Goddard&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn, and Goddard is a Cause célèbre in the international Lesbian community. Article is well written, not sensationalist, it is too much for a merged subsection on City of London School for Girls
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It is certainly true that there has been a lot of media attention to this event, but it seems to me that this is a "burst" as defined in .  The event itself is (regrettably) not unusual or "significant", Ms. Goddard appears to have no sources of notability other than in connection with this crime, and she doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria set out in Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts)#Perpetrators.  In considering the balance between  and the |general notability guideline, I was guided by this quotation: "The significance of an event or individual should be indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable secondary sources."  There are certainly multiple reliable secondary sources but I find myself unable to believe that this coverage is going to be "persistent".  If it does persist, I don't think there's any bar to considering this subject in a second AfD; say, three or six months down the road
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: serious case of  and . Not everyone who's covered by the newspapers deserves a Wikipedia article; this woman was the subject of brief coverage, but has not yet achieved long-term notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: All the coverage of her career in reliable sources is incidental to the crime she committed, so it's another clear . It's possible she may become notable in the future if this story keeps resurfacing, but that's not the case now. (If in the event that she does become notable, the thing she's notable for must go in the lead paragraph - and let's face it, it ain't that she's a classical musician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: a pretty obvious .  Is anyone actually claiming she is notable for anything else?  I don't see it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)