Deletion of Daniel R. Gernatt, Jr.

Comment: Looks like the author threw into the references any document that mentions the subject's name even if it is does not actually discuss the subject.  Also, most of the references are not authoritative.  WP is |not a who's who
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWHOSWHO)

Comment: WP:GNG comes down to http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Daniel%20R.%20Gernatt,%20Jr. whether a subject is sufficiently important and covered that the general public would come to an encyclopedia to search for it.  While the argument can be made that the award given by the NY State Assembly passes , it all comes down to how likely is this to be searched for.  I see no problem with sourcing, content, or any other Wikipedia policy but this subject is just past the obscure line for inclusion as I see it.  As much as I appreciate the incredible amount of excellent work {{u|Daniellagreen}} has put into this article, aside from the nonsense in early July and the listing of this AFD I don't see more than http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=Daniel%20R.%20Gernatt%2C%20Jr. a cursory notice of this article's subject.  I tried hard to find a reason to save this from deletion, but per the established guidelines, I have to argue deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)