Deletion of Paul Penzone

Comment: I appreciate that this is a borderline case with nuanced policy considerations, and Bearcat has made his case well--but in the final analysis, I feel that the aggregate of the sources is sufficient to at least minimally break the  threshold.  Having reviewed each of the sources, I am not convinced that there is anything particularly  about the coverage as whole (local or otherwise), nor that it is particularly focused on Arpaio to the exclusion of Penzone.  I'm not doing cartwheels over it, but there does seem sufficient notability for an article here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:routine)