Deletion of Punctual objection to evolution

Comment: completely unsourced |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per above as unsourced, unverifiable OR, and . "It's not even wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: it needs to establish its otability|notability (at least!) before merging.  Thusfar it appears to be an idea penned by the editor who created this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as unsourced, |OR nonsense.  I should add that I've already asked the editor who created it (who appears to be the author of this "concept") to address these concerns, but it looks completely unsalvageable to me.  Its ignorance of mechanisms of speciation is nearly total
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: original research, get your own website if you want to "assert your right".  And yes, that's exactly the point of  that information on Wikipedia has to be "available elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: As a purported theory (and apparently OR at that) it fails , as a scientific concept, it is unfortunately not even wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)