Deletion of Mineral Gap

Comment: Pretty much everything is about the thing being built, which is routine coverage, and only really establishes that the thing was going to exists, and now exists. There's nothing wrong with stubs, but if a stub is all that can possibly be written, then it's likely the subject doesn't meet . No prejudice against userfying if
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this appears top be a |very ordinary office park. How is this even remotely notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)