Deletion of 2017 Patan riots

Comment: Sourcing seems to indicate that it meets  and that this was more than routine  type event. Merging to the Violence against Muslims in India  article would also be okay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: only a few first-hand news reports. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: there have been a number of riots that happened years ago and to this day they are being discussed on daily or at least weekly basis. However this incident is not one of them and very far from it. It doesn't pass  because it violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS is not applicable--seriously, go read it.   is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:INDEPTH coverage over a span of several monthshttps://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/after-communal-riots-gujarats-vadavali-to-hold-mass-wedding-today/articleshow/58770918.cms with  impacthttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/20/caravan-of-love-takes-its-peace-message-to-indian-families-touched-by-hate being discussed in both National & International media certainly makes it a notable event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: Clearly fails  and (E). &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N)

Comment: this is more than routine news coverage as currently there's pending litigation which will call for more coverage and providing more content to the article as time passes. Also initially it meet  by being covered in multiple reliable sources which are well obvious in the article.  is primarily meant to deter reporting original news direct from field to Wikipedia, but once the event received reasonable coverage in reputable secondary sources then NOTNEWS will no longer apply. And this article fulfilled that; The guardian|UK's Guardian, Times of India and the Indian Express are enough to satisfy |verifiability. ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:V)

Comment: Seems to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per Jclemens, Vanadmonde93.  doesn't apply - it refers mostly to routine coverage, but this has received coverage in international media too and so passes . There may be much more significant riots but that are talked about for years but that doesn't mean that this one is not notable. There may also be a hundred other riots, but if all receive significant coverage in international media (highly doubt that's the case) all should be written about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: This riot was covered well into http://www.frontline.in/social-issues/loot-and-arson/article9632111.ece late April and https://www.altnews.in/media-bias-tale-two-riots-basirhat-west-bengal-vs-vadavali-gujarat/?utm_content=bufferea779&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer even July due to claims that it was a premeditated attack rather than general  communalism. Also, keep in mind that this also probably got more coverage in Hindi newspapers than English-speaking ones due to it taking place in India
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: per nom  as per  and has no  impact.There a news reports on the day of the incident in March after that are no  coverage after the incident day news reports and there are only 4 pieces after that , 1 article and 2 brief mentions after that one article in http://www.frontline.in/social-issues/loot-and-arson/article9632111.ece frontline April , another https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/after-communal-riots-gujarats-vadavali-to-hold-mass-wedding-today/articleshow/58770918.cms brief mention reporting mass wedding in the village May  and brief mention  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/20/caravan-of-love-takes-its-peace-message-to-indian-families-touched-by-hate in the guardian and another mention https://www.altnews.in/media-bias-tale-two-riots-basirhat-west-bengal-vs-vadavali-gujarat/?utm_content=bufferea779&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer in a NON RS source in July which claims there was little media coverage  in  and there is no significant coverage of the incident beyond routine news and brief mentions  and only 1 article and 2 brief mentions and a story in a NON RS source in 8 months since March clearly fails  and has clearly no continued coverage or significant coverage and clearly is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING||WP:INDEPTH||WP:LASTING)

Comment: Interestingly, few editors manipulate  in AFDs in less covered incidents like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Nadia riots, perhaps because of their political and religious bias
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per nom it is just another violation of . Lack of coverage in independent sources and already lost relevance only some days after the incident took place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per , otable -- Pankaj Jain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N)

Comment: Per the analysis of Pharaoh of the Wizards. Doesn't pass notability and it exactly fails  per the nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)