Deletion of List of Los Angeles Police Department officers killed in the line of duty

Comment: The article fails NLIST and  and the subject fails  and . The subject, the death of LAPD officers on-duty, as opposed to the death of individual officers has to be covered in reliable sources. Any statements about what's {{tq|"usually kept"}} are logically inconsistent with sentences about how another similar list was just deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:LISTN||WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems like a  issue more than anything, owing to its intent to be an ''exhaustive'' list. A single list of notable police officers killed in the line of duty seems quite reasonable, but these lengthy attempts to include every single person who died this way is MEMORIAL and a  issue. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:SALAT)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: this is a list of people so the relevant guideline to pass is . Lists which provide navigation or information are usually kept. This list provides information. The death of a police officer is dramatic  yet the officer may not merit an individual article, so the list is an appropriate placement. The nomination calls out the lack of references, however items on the list can be referenced they are notable. Additionally the fact that another list of Sherifs was deleted does not mean this list should be deleted - we may find a new 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST||WP:LOCALCONSENSUS)