Deletion of Michael J. Freedman

Comment: Obvious pass of , as argued above. Whether or not the nomination was made in good faith, it seems to have been done |without due diligence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Meets  as an ACM Fellow. {{u|Ferkingstad}}, the ACM reference shows that the society did in depth analysis of the subject and his work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: clear pass of rof plus a rout
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: wrong notability criterion in nomination (should be  not ), obvious pass of #C1 (heavily cited publications) as well as #C3 for the ACM Fellow, and suggestion above that this is a bad-faith nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)