Deletion of Rimon Law P.C.

Comment: Clearly the Keep !voters above have not read the  guidelines, especially . I have searched extensively and I am confident that there are no references about this company that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The references in ABA Journal are the very definition of churnalism and fail . Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: If the best ref (23) is http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/legal_rebels_2012_if_the_shoe_fits, sorry, it's a single paragraph focusing on the company founder(s), not the company. And they are just one of several similar cases mentioned in the article. So this is coverage 'in passing', not 'in depth'. So, this being, per comments above, 'the best' source... it fails  and higher level policies by a long shot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: References must contain "Independent Content" (as defined by ) and this reference fails abysmally. The article relies entirely on an interview with the founders and contains no content that can be clearly attributed to a source unaffiliated with the company. You pretty much acknowledge that this article is PR (which it is) and therefore fails ORGIND. Also, in order to meet the criteria for establishing notability "multiple" references are required. {{u|Bearian}}, I see you've stuck to your guns below when discussing with {{U|May His Shadow Fall Upon You}} but perhaps in light the ORGIND guidelines, you might want to revisit/rescind your !vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)