Deletion of List of Legend of Legaia characters

Comment: plot of the game is not extensive to the point that a character list is necessary for understanding of the plot for a reader. As such, this is |undue weight and unnecessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT)

Comment: Not covered in third party sources.  It |isn't our decision to say that "X" class of game should have detailed articles on characters and the GNG helps (in practice) to prevent us from having to make that decision
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as no guideline or policy suggests this is notable. Either it has reliable third-party sources, or it doesn't. If it doesn't, it fails both and . Keep in mind that notability has a specialized meaning on Wikipedia that ensures a basic standard of reliability, rather than a measure of importance. Several recent deletion discussions reveal that we hold character lists to high standards, and don't exempt them from our content policies: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_characters_in_Urbaniacs|one, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miscellaneous characters of Command & Conquer (2nd nomination)|two, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Canon Sims Characters|three, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goth Family|four, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosses in The Legend of Zelda series (2nd nomination)|five, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Digimon in Digimon World DS|six. And those are just from the past couple of weeks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)