Deletion of Brian A. Scott

Comment: as |a non-notable person. The sources provided are very plainly |unreliable and privately maintained websites. And considering that this information could be considered defamatory if untrue, it meets the very definition of a |BLP violation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: My common sense tells me you don't actually understand what a reliable source is. A |reliable source is a source of ''"material that has been thoroughly vetted by the scholarly community. This means published in peer-reviewed sources, and reviewed and judged acceptable scholarship by the academic journals."'' This includes articles from newspapers and magazines of good reputation that exercise editorial review. This does not include privately maintained websites with no evidence of proper review, or a at least notable opinion of reliability from obviously reliable sources. This being the case, this individual has ''not'' been shown to satisfy the notability guideline, as the only fundamental criterion for this guideline is the existence of multiple, reliable, independent sources concerning him. All other criteria for notability exist only to establish those cases in which we can be certain such sources exist even if they are not presented, and you haven't shown this to be certain. Further, by the same argument, this inherently violates the |BLP ''policy'', which requires that any possibly defamatory material come from a reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: unless somebody can provide some |reliable sources (not blogs, POV websites and reviews of a self-published book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS)

Comment: as per nom, it appears that this is non-notable - fails , and may have something with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COATRACK)