Deletion of Caiyad Phahad

Comment: per Wikipedia:Notability (people) and . The links for "Caiyad Phahad won Inter School Cricket Tournament Title for his school", "Caiyad Phahad Graduated from IQRA University", and "Caiyad Phahad Success News from Institute of Business and Technology" from ''Daily Jang'' are all dead links. Judging by their titles, they fail , which states ''inter alia'': |Per Wikipedia policy, routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article ... Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill|Run-of-the-mill events — common, everyday, ordinary items that do not stand out — are probably not notable. The fourth reference, titled "Caiyad Phahad as Moulana Fazal Ur Rehman in Geo TV's Hum Sab Umeed Say Hain", is from ''Geo TV'' and cannot be considered an independent source. The http://www.moovyshoovy.com/watch-online/hindi_movie_Na-Ghar-Ke-Na-Ghaat-Ke/Video/Caiyad-Phahad-Karachi-Law--Ghar-Ke-Na-Ghaat-Ke-Indus-Vision-wmv/crs=youtube/vid_ID=gjh8TyXEZr- fifth reference states: "This video was found by the moovyshoovy search engine on youtube.com. Owner of this video is the youtube user Caiyad." It cannot be considered a reliable source.The other sources are mostly interviews the subject has done or photos/articles written by the subject (http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6171147/image/58228807-caiyad-phahad-with-sonam-kapoor example).Owing to lack of significant coverage in |reliable sources, this individual fails Wikipedia:Notability (people), and the article fails Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RS)

Comment: A blizzard of self-promotional, self-submitted or otherwise unreliable sources; what we're not seeing here are news articles from reliable journalists, published in reliable publications, about the subject.   does not require us to suspend the policies governing notability and verifiability in newcomers' favor.  Further, I have considerable sympathy for the premise that two and a half years in, it is incumbent on an editor to become familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines; no one gets to be a newbie indefinitely.That being said, Caiyad, no one is demanding that you agree to the article's removal, or appreciate the action when it is removed.  Certainly, if you've found other articles on Wikipedia that you don't think meet our notability guidelines, feel free to nominate them for deletion if they cannot be adequately improved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)