Deletion of Nobroker.com

Comment: The article needs some clean-up by removing anything promotional. I also found some reliable sources which talk about it, its products and acquisitions: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/nobrokercom-ties-up-with-oyo-life-to-scale-up-co-living-services/article32445191.ece, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/newsbuzz/nobroker-com-to-hire-more-staff-give-salary-hike/articleshow/75841454.cms, https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/real-estate/nobrokercom-launches-property-management-services-with-rental-guarantee-for-owners/article32067524.ece, https://www.retail4growth.com/news/nobroker-launches-grocery-store-in-4-cities-to-supply-daily-essentials-4951, https://www.thehindu.com/business/nobroker-acquires-society-connect/article30794942.ece and https://www.expresscomputer.in/news/nobroker-launches-touchless-entry-with-face-recognition-for-ensuring-protection-from-covid-19-in-housing-societies/59081/. That said, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The references provided above are interview style where the founder can say pretty much anything and fail , .  The others in the list are routine and trivial announcement of partnerships, hiring staff and product launches that fail . The other 15 references in the article are in a similar state, even one which is pure advertising, ''Why you need NoBroker'' that fails  as another interview style report with the lines ''“Tenants have been paying brokerage year on year without seeing .... states the CEO''. All in all, it is a generic property site of which there is millions. It entirely generic. It fails , specifically , ,  as well as  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:SIRS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SIRS||WP:DEL4||WP:DEL14)

Comment: The article needs a major cleanup, almost to the point of , but there are a couple of proper RS references and it does sound like a significant enough tech venture to warrant an article, as long as the promo fluff — which currently makes up much/most of the article — is removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)