Deletion of 2037 Bomber

Comment: This article was previously nominated for deletion in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2037_Bomber&type=revision&diff=631217619&oldid=625190243 2014,https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2037_Bomber&oldid=708478279 2016 and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2037_Bomber&type=revision&diff=827585072&oldid=806613713 2018.  This article was previously merged and then demerged from Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2037_Bomber&oldid=1004032651 January 2021.  In addition to the unsupported nom claims of  and of "dropped within a year", it is clear procedures were not followed and no  was carried out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per , the article ought to not be deleted.  It's had 55 edits since it was nominated to AfD.  At nomination the article was 4,193 bytes.  It is now 11,503 bytes.  Since nomination, the article has been edited by 11 different editors, by my count.  It has more than twice as many sources.  Sources have been eliminated where warranted.  And this is not to mention the serious vices in the original nomination, which include lack of a , unsubstantiated claims, etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: there is nothing on the TP about a  issue.It is false that the concept was "dropped in one year".  The article itself makes it clear that it was ''the official policy of the US Air Force'' from 1999 to 2006 to have a 2037 Bomber; i.e. from the 1999 Bomber Roadmap to the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review.  On these grounds alone the AfD ought to be rejected with prejudice.Furthermore, consider the sources over the years (among the other sources in the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: When the article was nominated, it had six sources from 1999 to 2008.  It now has twice as many sources, ranging from 1999 to 2016.  It really is incredible how sources written in three separate decades, i.e., the 1990's, the 2000's, and the 2010's keep citing the 2037 Bomber.   This might be a  case.  In any event, no evidence was ever raised for the original claim for deletion: that this was a  and a subject that "was dropped within one year
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:COATRACK)