Deletion of Crying Lightning

Comment: Despite being confirmed by the band per Rexplosion's link to their official website. I still think it's |a little too soon to make an article for this song. There's a http://news.google.com/news?ned=us&hl=en&ncl=d-Vq-yw0jP8J18MEwBJC01DPpopUM&cf=all few Google news links about the announcement of the single, but that's pretty much it. I'd wait until its radio premiere or we get a tracklisting for the single (ie the b-sides. Most Arctics singles have at least two or three) before making an arcticle
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Also, Warthog, I direct you to the Star Trek argument on . This comes down to notability. And it is clearly notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Hate to push the issue, because it's really not important given that it ''will'' have an article, either post-airplay or post-release. But it complies with . Anyone who knows the music scene and the Arceys' chart history will know, as the first single off a new album, it is "almost certain" to chart, probably in the top 10. They are one of the biggest bands in the UK, and this is pretty much accepted. There will be more information in the coming days and weeks about it so I think that the only reason that you could have for deleting this article would be for not enough information about it, with regards to things like music videos, tracklistings, and anecdotal evidence behind the history of the song
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: to album article as described above; no evidence this is a notable single as defined by 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: as a plausible search term. Just because it is confirmed doesn't automatically make it #Songs|notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)