Deletion of Burning Legion

Comment: per #INFO,  and . This article should be deleted, because it is excessively detailed, impossible to sources for, and it puts undue weight on one aspect of the game
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WAF||WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: as this #GUIDE|list of game characters have |reliable sources to demonstrate |notability. Plot summary with out proper primary or secondary sources are good for fansites but not an encylopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:FICT)

Comment: an article containing cruft is not a valid reason for deletion, as |gamecruft shows. The nominator's assumption that the article will acquire |original research is not a valid reason for deletion.  The nominator's assumption that lack of sources means the topic is not |notable is not valid reason for deletion.  An article containing plot summaries is not a valid reason for deletion, as |plot summaries shows. #REASON does say that articles can be deleted if "All attempts to find reliable sources in which article information can be verified have failed", but no attempts to find sources appear to have been made.   says that "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:PLOT||WP:DEL||WP:ATD)