Deletion of Kenneth Bone

Comment: nbsp; This is not a clear decision.&nbsp; On the one hand we have a timely reasonable article with encyclopedic viewpoint that presents the facts that people want to know who have come to Wikipedia for this information.&nbsp; The fact that the article is filled with trivia-oids (factoids of trivia) in no way changes that this is what readers want.&nbsp; This satisfies WP:IAR for a keep result.&nbsp; We have a huge news spike that hasn't abated, as this morning on NBC's Meet the Press, Bone's Twitter "Likes" before and after the debate were reported.&nbsp; We also have the second presidential debate coverage "Reception" which will absolutely need to cover this topic as an event, and there might be reason to merge the bio.&nbsp; We also have , which says this article under discussion is what Wikipedia is not.&nbsp; Since I'm from the view that  should be closed as a distraction from our core purpose, and that there is no deadline, I take the view that we can wait a couple of months before deciding if this low-profile individual should have a standalone article.&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:ITN)

Comment: or merge if any of it is worth including in the article about the debates. Textbook 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per , seems undue to merge into a short summary of the debate. He's not yet a Joe the Plumber
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: A pretty textbook case of , but Bone is relevant to the second debate. A sentence or two describing Bone's role in the debate should be sufficient
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Ken Bone is a low-profile individual and reliable sources only cover him in relation to his debate question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: people should please review  and consider other comments before voting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: for now as that seems to be the consensus due to lots of news sources (even though  and he's known for only 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I mean, I think he's entertaining, but it's obviously a clear 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . The only reason he is known is the single question he asked during the presidential debate; everything else he has done is non-notable and would not have been covered if it weren't for the debate question. BLP1E exists for this exact purpose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: it seems unlikely he will meet guidelines for  and  despite Reddit's aggrandizing and apparent invasion. Wikipedia is not a place for memes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Not even debatable. This is pure 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)