Deletion of Juan A. Uceda

Comment: Below is a summarized table of available sources that are not primary. I find myself in agreement with {{u|FOARP}}, where they state above, "what's missing is actual . We need more than a sentence or two, or quotes, or articles where Uceda is obviously the source...". Myself, I get the feeling that folks may be seeing all the links and saying, "Wow, look at all that coverage" to justify keep !votes such as "there's enough out there" and "I see enough",  but could potentially be ignoring what is actually stated within the articles, which really isn't much. None of the coverage provides ''significant coverage'', not in the slightest. The subject continues to fail , and the article is almost entirely reliant upon primary sources, because secondary sources are providing insufficient biographical information about the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per . There's enough out there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)