Deletion of Hannah Gavron

Comment: In-depth coverage specifically about her in ''The Guardian'' and ''The New Statesman'', and an entire memoir (with multiple book reviews in major media) argue that she passes  (in death if not in life, but I don't see why that's relevant). One could plausibly reorient our article to be about the memoir rather than directly about her (one or the other is clearly notable) but what would be the point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes the GNG. The article is not written in the manner of an obituary or memorial, and it is sourced to non-obituaries written many years after Gavron's death. These sources argue for her work being influential, and our typical numerical indicators back that up. Adding up the GS citations for ''The Captive Wife'' (they're given under several slightly variant headings) yields a total well over 600, and WorldCat has it as held by 648 libraries. It's not a ''typical'' pass of #C1, given that the body of her work is comparatively small, but the things people do say about that work indicate "a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)