Deletion of Bo (dog)

Comment: Laughable.  To say his owner is famous is snarky. First Dogs have a long lineage of being part of American pop Culture, since at least Fala (dog)|Fala.  This is an |extremely well sourced article about a dog that generates headlines -- notice plural. Nomination admits notability of the dog
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The subject has massive coverage in reliable sources which shows |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A classic example of the misunderstanding of .  It's intended for topics that have had no significant coverage from reliable sources and not notable, not because the topic became notable due to being related to an already notable person.  If someone is notable, it doesn't matter ''how'' they become notable, it's that they ''are'' notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: More than sufficient coverage in reliable sources to satisfy ; see article's References. I am tempted to minnow-slap because no one's arguing for notability thru inheritance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)