Deletion of San Escobar

Comment: per . A pile of primary sources (what newspapers are) about a gaffe and subsequent interest online (attributing to the many keep !votes) does not notability make. Come back in fifty years when there are responsible books (secondary sources) written that examine this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: And it's |SNOWing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Wikipedia |isn't the news - we don't have an article for every slip-up by a politician. This is an immensely forgettable, temporary thing. At the very most, some this MAY warrant a small mention in the article of the person involved, but there's no way it is worth its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: and '''Merge''' to Witold Waszczykowski per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)