Deletion of Henry Gobus

Comment: completely fails ,  and it is clearly promotional. The claim of being equal to Darwin in terms of putting forward evolutionary theories, a claim that is sourced only by the book itself that claims to say that very thing, really takes the cake
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: as |vanispamcruftisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT)

Comment: per  the article is terrible and they don't meet any kind of notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: obviously. Besides the lack of academic notability (), this is also problematic with respect to , which demands mainstream coverage of non-mainstream views. Without that coverage, we cannot have a sufficiently neutral article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: clearly PROMO and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)