Deletion of Robert Young Pelton (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nominator's argument doesn't fit neatly into any of the categories in romotion (Hero worshiping isn't good but it doesn't have to be an ad.). Furthermore, with otability clear, as I believe it is in this case, it is preferable to rewrite than to delete. Furthermore, it is possible to rewrite articles like this even in a wiki-environment with competing opinions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:N)

Comment: We don't delete notable topics just because we don't like how an article is written. This author has plenty of book reviews to pass AUTHOR #3 not to mention tons of GNG material. DGG please stop using AfD as a mechanism to address perceived content or editor behavior issues, . The previous AfD closed Keep just as this one will because there are abundant ''sources'' that show this topic is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)