Deletion of James Pipas

Comment: miserable failure of a deletion nomination, basically , with no attempt at evaluation by . He clearly passes #C5 (named chair) based only on the text of the article as nominated, and even a cursory search of Google Scholar also shows heavy enough citations to pass #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE||WP:PROF)

Comment: As noted above, he passes #C1 and #C5|C5, and the nomination makes no attempt to argue otherwise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Named chair - obvious pass of , nevermind citations, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Clear pass of rof#C1. Nominator should carry out efore before making further nominations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:B)

Comment: Nomination does not explain a legitimate reason for deletion, the subject clearly meets NPROF.  would be apt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)