Deletion of Liza Koshy (actress)

Comment: Of course I am sure you all know that for GNG to be met the subject needs to receive significant coverage in references deemed reliable by Wikipedia standards. Many of the multitude of sources here certainly do not have significant coverage of Liza Koshy. For instance, look at the 4 or 5 references listed in Variety. A reliable source no doubt. One article is a list of finalists for the upcoming Shorty awards. Koshy has a brief mention with her name once on a list of finalists. Second is an article about the show Freakish. Article is about the show not LK. She has brief mention explaining her role the show. Thirdly there is another article about YouTube red. Several different people have brief mention including LK in the piece. Fourth is one with a review of Freakish again with only a brief mention of LK. Fifth is another list from the Teen Choice awards where a brief mention of LK in a category of nominees and a winner of a minor award. That is just Variety. Most of the other references are brief mentions. This subject does not pass . Did everyone here that kept parrotting passes GNG passes GNG actually read through and check each of the plentiful references? I did. Some editors who may not have, should really do so now, and be really well informed. You may shocked by what you find
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: in fact, . What can't people get about: she. is. notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:snowball)

Comment: ndash; Lots of canvassing going on here, with Hank Green tweeting about the topic and everything. Sources are good, though. No reason to delete if there are so many sources about someone. She even won a pretty decent number of awards. Subscriber count is irrelevant, of course, but we don't have somekind of anti-Youtube bias going on on Wikipedia, do we? Basically a  keep right here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)