Deletion of Amanda Herbert

Comment: Herbert meets  and , with her editing credentials alone. Add in her well-cited publications and there is no question of her notability. I'm puzzled by the nom's criterion "integration into the wiki". Is that an opaque reference to the article's former orphan status? Seems an odd reason to nominate for deletion. At any rate, it does now have one incoming link, and more would be welcome. Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: Per . Lets see: Doctor with multiple Postgraduate qualifications. Honorary '''senior''' lecturer at 3 important medical schools. chair of a relevant panel of the Royal College of Pathologists for 5 years. Editor of a relevant journal, current co-editor of another relevant journal. Author of '''138''' Research items with multiple citations. In short, meets cirteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Meets , numerous works cited and now in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)