Deletion of The Uncensored Library

Comment: Passes  with solid coverage from multiple journalistic perspectives
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Beyond the dedicated coverage in a few video game/tech websites, the fact that it’s getting coverage from National publication unrelated to gaming, like https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/13/tech/minecraft-uncensored-library-scli-intl/index.html CNN, shows that it does meet the . And this is coming from someone who typically advocated delete for these various Minecraft related things, as I believe most are not independently notable. This ones coverage is different though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: We have before us an article that has gotten a lot of international press for several days but for which  has not been met. The amount of coverage is far above the trifling coverage typical of articles deleted per , but much less than articles typically kept per . For the time being, I'm voting keep because of the international coverage and the breadth of coverage of the library. However, if the coverage dies down and it becomes apparent that the library was little more than a novelty, then I think a re-nomination would be appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RAPID)