Deletion of The National Currency Foundation

Comment: Coverage about the organisation is insubstantial and fail to meet .  The organisation was founded in in June 2011 so it a relatively new. No prejudice to recreation in the future if the coverage changes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: Hi Godot13! In answer to your question on my talkpage, this is what I see. Your article is highly promotional and reads like an advertisement for the organization. For example, take a look at the first section under Educational Goals. None of this content is encyclopedic. It appears that this article was written merely to promote awareness of the organization. This is not the purpose of an encyclopedia. We can establish notability by showing |significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Let's take a look at the 19 sources used. Ten are citations using the organization's website or the National Bank Note Census, which is maintained by the subject. An assessment of the other sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:VRS)

Comment: 1) Being an affiliate of the Smithsonian does not establish notability as that is |not inherited.  (2) |Notability in general requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Without actually seeing the souces, it is a bit of a guessing game.  If there multiple articles, and the publisher is deemed a |reliable source, and the author/source of the article is independent of the organsiation, then the answer is generally yes. (3)  See answer to 2.  As for resubmitting in the future, there is no bar to creating the article later if the organisation gains coverage over time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:RS)