Deletion of Timeline of the war in Donbass (January–March 2016)

Comment: After studying through the articles I can conclude this is written in a complete one sided point of view.  applies here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIARY)

Comment: This is clear  territory, with a gigantic volume of unreliable sources (including Kremlin propaganda). But even leading that aside, this is excessive intricate detail. There is no reason why the important/key points could not be treated, in greatly summarized form and with much better sources, in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per Guy, RGloucester and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per MOS:LIST,  and  . Note that all of these are Wikipedia official guidelines, while the invoked   and  are mere essays
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:PARTISAN||WP:PRESERVE||WP:TNT||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: best thing for these articles is a large dose of . If there is to be anything useful or recoverable, this is not in fact usable material to start from
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per nominator, per , per , and yes, per . It is absolutely not humanly possible to "clean up" this huge mess. Totally unsalvageable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROPAGANDA||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TNT)

Comment: This series of articles is a total disaster. Even putting aside the source issue, they are filled with direct extracts of daily news reports (see ), with no obvious encyclopaedic value. No attempt is made to provide a narrative of any kind, nor is there any indication of significance or context for the 'information' displayed. The actual sources themselves are horrible...we're basically presented with a mess of unreliable Russian propaganda and unreliable Ukrainian propaganda, none of which is picked up by reputable western outlets. Destroy this mess...it is unsalvageable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I think this is clearly not the case of . The  essay rightly makes the points about copyright violations and "TNT tipping point argument" (if the article's content is useless including all the versions in history). None of that is the case here. These pages are not useless. One should simply remove clearly unreliable sources (I tried to to it on one of these pages, and this is clearlt doable). Also note that the first page in the list is already fixed in this regard. As about the day-by-day coverage, I think this is definitely excessive, but it does not make these pages unreadable, so this is not a reason for deletion. Hence my "keep" above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: These topics are not notable, failing  and . The broader topic "Timeline of the war in Donbass" is already covered in War in Donbass
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT)

Comment: Undue weight given to minor incidents and extreme unreliability of sources.  required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)