Deletion of Thomas Charvériat

Comment: The citations above represent fairly, proportionately and without bias, significant views, published by reliable sources on the topic. "The neutral point of view does not mean exclusion of certain points of view, but including all verifiable points of view which have sufficient due weight", per . While naturally having our own points of view, the goal is improving Wikipedia content in good faith. Finally, arguments have been given on both sides of this issue. The preponderance of evidence supports |notability, and more particularly rtist, i.e., the person who is the topic of a biographical article is worthy of notice, remarkable or significantly interesting enough for a written account of that person's life be recorded within Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:YESPOV||WP:BIO||WP:A)

Comment: Significant coverage specifically about the individual is pretty thin, although I did find http://www.lepetitjournal.com/shanghai/communaute/communaute/52537-shanghai-communaut this. Also open to the possibility of a selective merge/redirect to Island6. Coverage in more established  mentions him in the context of this org
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)