Deletion of Autumn Tears

Comment: would appear to meet  through secondary coverage.  Keep in mind that as a band in a niche genre, you may have to look a bit harder to find references than you would with the latest radio rock band, but they seem to be there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: without ever doing anything notable" - is highly subjective opinion. I think nominator should try to use Google first, if he cannot judge personally. Nomination contradicts  "For composers and performers outside mass media traditions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Ignoring the fact the nomination comes across as , here are a few more reviews or mentions to help it pass #C1, http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=1&id=13308, http://www.gothtronic.com/?page=23&band=599. '''Merge''' the 2 albums into the main article. However there are more than enough sources out there for ''The Hallowing'' album to have it's own article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: notability requires |reliable sources, i doubt a single one of those passes as a reliable source. Blogs, self published fanzines and websites are simply not acceptable sources. Fame, popularity and genre have no relevance to notability, every subject needs to pass the same criteria. I cannot find anything in rolling stone nor allmusic. --neon white
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)