Deletion of William Schnoebelen

Comment: True, he's not widely known (and that through his Chick connection), but he's likely to be read in some Fundamentalist church circles, and seen as "authoritative" despite facts to the contrary. (Also, young people in and around Fundamentalism are told ''The Lord of the Rings'', comic-book heroes, and such recent mythologies are "evil", and sometimes turn to these kinds of materials as an alternative. I can't cite that, since it'd break .) I'd like there to be something objective about him on Wikipedia; silence speaks too much in his favor, IMO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: for a few reasons. None of the references in the article can truly be considered a "high-quality reference", something explicitly called for in . The subject gets some google hits, but most of them seem to be products of his own self-promotion. I can't find a single article in a reliable source. Even eviscerating to a stub isn't very feasible - there still needs to be an indication of ''why'' the subject is notable, and simply stating that he is an evangelist won't be adequate. If someone can find better sources than I could, I would reconsider my !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)