Deletion of Lloyd Levitin

Comment: Doesn't quite meet the notability requirements of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: TruthbringerToronto made a good point. However, Sempra Energy had many CFOs and none of them have their own Wikipedia articles. The current CFO, Mark Snell does not have his own Wikipedia article. Sempra Energy has numerous officers, and they frequently change.   Lloyd Levitin is not even the CFO anymore, and he did not have any notable accomplishments while he was a CEO. I think that he should be mentioned in a page listing all past officers of Sempra Energy. Also, if you read the source about Lloyd Levitin persuading the US Departement of Justice, you will find that it was not intepreted correctly. http://www.jurecon.com/news.htm Lloyd Levitin was one of the many people involved in the case, and his name should be included in a related article. In conclusion, Lloyd Levitin does not meet  and does not deserve  to have his own article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I do not believe that any of the various Marquis Who's Who vanity publications would qualify as "''credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy''" under . In fact, an exposé by Forbes magazine found them to be just the opposite: http://www.forbes.com/fyi/1999/0308/063.html "''The Hall of Lame''".  I really think we should insist on better sources than that to substantiate notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)