Deletion of Matthew (Matt) Bennett

Comment: It seems this fellow has greater notability for his stagework, than for his work in film and television.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Matthew+Bennett%2C+theater&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=a  Pity that |this was not discovered before bringing it to AFD. The article WILL be expanded and peoperly sourced within hours
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: of an article on a notable producer and director, one who easily meets  through ,  and , http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0071923/filmotype  I note with angst that the article was templated for deletion only one minute after its creation,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthew_%28Matt%29_Bennett&action=historysubmit&diff=403215323&oldid=403215155 and then sent to AFD only eight minutes after the second deletion template was contested.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthew_%28Matt%29_Bennett&action=historysubmit&diff=403230714&oldid=403229536  Surely this was not simply in reprisal?  Or is this the manner now with which new editors are to be treated?  Have  and  been now assigned as historical???  Is this the ''new'' way of Wikipedia?  Shameful
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)