Deletion of Starships!

Comment: Notability isn't well sourced, appears to be just another flash game.  I have a very, VERY slight suspicion of|conflict of interest, but I could be wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Notability not established, websites provided are not |reliable, can't find any better sources either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per  and lack of reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The main article contributors knew this AfD was coming and have been trying to find sources for the article. Outside of |unreliable sources such as blogs and message boards, none have appeared
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Flash game? Did you even READ the article? Also where do you get your  suspicion from? Such claims are highly offensive unless you have any actual proof. Why do you think  is hardly ever used as an argument on AfD? A solid doze of civility would do this AfD good
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:VANITY)

Comment: The article is non-notable???? Well let's delete 99% of Wikipedia then unless you have reliable sources showing that the article does not fail . This not a vote. If something has already been stated you don't need to repeat it let alone repeat it in a way that clearly indicates you didn't understand what was being said to begin with
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No |reliable secondary sources, and a vague bibliography with no reason stated for how the books relate to the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Agreed, i'm starting to think its  that is the wider problem here, its much stricter than usic for example. —The preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:M)

Comment: No  means no  means no article. If an interesting topic is very difficult to source ... we have no article on it until we have the sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)