Deletion of Mikael Rothstein

Comment: meets  notability criteria for . The provided references show the subject has significant coverage in independent reliable sources, such as http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/mennesker/kompromisløs-forsker-med-bløde-sider Kristeligt Dagblad, http://politiken.dk/debat/profiler/herbener/ECE1777547/interview-med-religionshistoriker-mikael-rothstein/ Politiken, and http://www.b.dk/sog#pid:11;id:netsprint-search-search-box-form;query:Mikael%20Rothstein%20 Berlingsle Tidende
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: He's attracted considerable press. I found a large amount of coverage of his opinions and one article entirely about him on the occasion of his 50th birthday. He's also co-edited at least one prestigious book (for Cambridge University Press) since the article was put together, there's at least one archived program on Danish Radio that is him sharing his opinions, and there are a large number of citations of his work on new religious movements. I've filled out the article with a lot of Danish sources, but there are also brief mentions in the ''New York Times'' of one of his statements. Clear pass of the GNG, in my opinion, and I believe he also meets  for his influence in his field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)