Deletion of LJ Drama

Comment: per notability ().  Specifically, nominator's concerns ''not'' endorsed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: First, if the nominator finds the facts to be incorrect to the point that he can enumerate specific instances, he should rewrite the section rather than blanking it and listing the article here (especially if it survived an earlier vote). That comes close to . Second, does that section need to be so long anyway? It could be dealt with in a paragraph or two. Third, the site's notable IMO due to its association with the undeniably notable LJ. Fourth, for the nominator to assert that he wants his privacy when his user page links to his own website is a mite hypocritical
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: since it doesn't appear to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per Capitalistroadster and others. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No evidence that this meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)