Deletion of Vimala's Curryblossom Cafe

Comment: per the significant coverage in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources provided by {{user|Northamerica1000}}. The Oxford University Press book ''Forked: A New Standard for American Dining'' provides https://books.google.com/books?id=NXwwCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA52 significant coverage of both Vimala Rajendran and her cafe.Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Audience says: The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence of |significant coverage by international or national, or at least Newspaper#Local or regional|regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary. The Oxford University Press book source is clearly a national or international source. The other sources from the regional newspaper ''The News & Observer'' and the local television station WRAL-TV also provide significant coverage. There is significant independent journalistic reporting and analysis. That the journalists included quotes from Vimala Rajendran is standard journalistic practice and does not make the sources non-independent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The article was created on 21:04, 26 December 2017‎ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vimala%27s_Curryblossom_Cafe&oldid=817199248 link) by a relatively new user and then nominated for deletion 20 minutes later on 26 December 2017‎ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vimala%27s_Curryblossom_Cafe&diff=817201527&oldid=817200639 diff). Then, the user's work is chastised here with commentary such as "...homespun, so full of corny sentimentality", etc. Not commenting on notability at this time, but sheesh, really? See also . I hope the editor that created the article won't be discouraged and cease contributing to Wikipedia because of this matter
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: An argument to keep a Wikipedia:LOCAL|local street restuarant that has a human interest side with the continued ''can of worms'' (OH! now |other stuff exists) that everything in the world should be on Wikipedia. A problem is that even if there are local arguements |'''NOTDIRECTORY''' states ''"However, Wikipedia is not a directory of everything in the universe that exists or has existed."''. There is also the specific #6, ''Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations'': '''"restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y"'''. |'''NOTADVERTISING''' states ''"...so '''articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable'''."''. The "University of North Carolina Press" sponsors the quarterly ''Southern Cultures: The Special Issue on Food''. This publication also includes such things as ''Bernard Herman on Theodore Peed's Turtle Party'' and ''Will Sexton's "Boomtown Rabbits: The Rabbit Market in Chatham County, North Carolina,"''. This doesn't give a green light to have an article by ''Courtney Lewis on how the "Case of the Wild Onions" paved the way for Cherokee rights...'' or other local cultural aspects of southern living, These things are also printed by the https://books.google.com/books?id=Byiag4oetT8C&source=gbs_navlinks_s University of North Carolina Press. This is twisting the ''local printing'', allowed by an otherwise |"regional" publisher, to be ikilawyering|Wikilawyered into meaning pretty much ''all things in the world can have an article''. Wikipedia:Notability states ''"A topic is presumed to merit an article if
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHER||WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:AUD||WP:W)

Comment: as per {{u|Northamerica1000}}'s comments above. I like Special:Contributions/42.111.196.105|42.111.196.105's mention of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)

Comment: per NorthAmerica1000 passes Special:Contributions/42.111.196.105|42.111.196.105
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)

Comment: Sources provided by other editors above show that this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This nomination strikes me as odd. It clearly passes the |general notability guideline, because a plethora of reliable sources that have more than "mentions": ''The News & Observer'', ''Indy Week'', ''The Story with Dick Gordon'', ''Grist (magazine)|Grist'', etc. No part of the general notability guideline says that it has to have national coverage or anything remotely close
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sourcing obviously fails the portion of  that looks for "sufficiently significant attention by the '''world at large'''". &spades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: a nn business only of local interest. Sourcing fails  / , and is mostly : interviews and PR driven puff pieces
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:AUD||WP:SPIP)

Comment: Per  searches, meets  per the book source and meets . I agree that the article would benefit from |copy editing, but the topic does ''meet'' notability guidelines, although not on a  grand level
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AUD||WP:GNG||WP:COPYEDIT)