Deletion of Emily Henderson

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Completely agree with {{ping|SuperJew}}.  excludes the majority of top division women's leagues around the world. Time for the requirements to be updated in line with other projects
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. Editors arguing keep would do well to review Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giulia Gwinn|this current AfD for an example of a female player whoc has not played in a fully professional league nore at a senior international level, but still has a number of dedicated articles written about her. Having done so, if possible, they should observe where similar articles exist for this player
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG)

Comment: To those voting to keep ({{ping|SuperJew}} and {{ping|Hmlarson}}), you need to provide some evidence of Henderson's notability (even aside from the appropriateness of ). Just did a quick google, and I can't find anything except match reports and previews. I'm all for promoting women's football, but that doesn't alter the need for more than  coverage. If you want to claim that the subject is notable you need to prove that is so, rather than just arguing that a guideline (which is a mere presumption) is incorrect. With the current sources out there, is there much prospect of this article being anything more than a basic stub
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:ROUTINE)