Deletion of 2014 Israeli shelling of UNRWA Gaza shelters

Comment: Sorry, what? The original title "2014 Israeli raids on UNRWA schools" was overwhelmingly Talk:2014_Israeli_shelling_of_UNRWA_Gaza_shelters#Requested_move|voted to be kept (I did not vote there). I got involved quite late in this article and was one of the people who was involved in changing the title to be less POV, since some other editors raised concern about "raid". A new title was unanimously Talk:2014_Israeli_shelling_of_UNRWA_Gaza_shelters#Move_Request_2|approved. I don't think this is a POV fork: the allegations are discussed Talk:2014_Israeli_shelling_of_UNRWA_Gaza_shelters#Synth.2C_POVFORK|here. This is a  from the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict article. See 2014_Israel–Gaza_conflict#Shelling_of_UNRWA_schools|section. There is no original research, no synth. All the incidents are collected http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/08/-sp-gaza-israeli-strikes-unrwa-schools here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: Clearly a  and  also POV title don't add much to article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as written, this is obviously a POV fork and suggesting otherwise is ignorant. Are we seriously suggesting this is the most NPOV title we could come up with? For a start, the incidents aren't all incidents of "shelling". It's spelled out in the first few lines. "Shelling" is artillery (which uses... you know... artillery shells) while the article quite clearly states that some were mortars. There's conjecture as to who fired/launched the shells/mortars in question or whether they were shells/mortars at or were perhaps Hamas rockets. Somehow we've still allowed the title "Israeli shelling of..." despite two of those things not being supported by the very text of the article. That's like an article about 3 people having heart attacks last week being titled Strange bovine strangulations of 1912. I'm still not convinced this "event" (strung together in a manner that suggests  anyway) is notable in the first place as a stand-alone thing. What makes this particular set of events (what makes it a "set" first) notable in its own right, separate from the many, many, many other sub-sets of events in this conflict
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: broadly. In ''contrast'' to most of the |newsy rubbish that the community insists on keeping when it's Israelis who were hurt, the Rafah shelling is ''actually still being talked about'' over a month later. (http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/09/10/uk-mideast-gaza-inquiry-idUKKBN0H51R220140910 - today) Delete votes that claim it's a POVFORK as long as it doesn't talk about violence against Israelis are nonsense and I hope the closing admin will give them the consideration they deserve. It's possible that other attacks on schools and shelters are ''not'' encyclopedically notable and that, based on coverage, the right decision will be to turn this into an article on the Rafah shelling and maybe mention other attacks on schools in a section - but that's a decision that needs to be made from the baseline of keeping the article on something that, going by the usual community standards in this topic area, is reeeeeally notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, while this is a |POV Fork, the subject has received significant coverage, but within the |scope of my proposed redirect target. Whether this article is recreated will largely depend on the improvement and growth of the redirect target and once a consensus is formed as to what |sub-articles are created if the redirect target meets 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:SCOPE||WP:SUBARTICLE||WP:TOOBIG)