Deletion of Comparison of Esperanto, Ido, Novial, Interlingua, and Lingua Franca Nova

Comment: Seems like  and synthesis to me, unless reliable sources are provided, this article shall be deleted. Anyway, the selection of specific IAL languages was arbitrary (Where is volapuk?), so I moved it to a new title who includes all IAL languages (though the article's still only about 5 languages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: for the article creator, or anyone else: Can you cite sources that discuss the similarities of these various languages? If so, that would help us satisfy the |verifiability requirement and to show that this work does not constitute |original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: A rudimentary reading of the article indicates that it may violate Wikipedia's  policy, but the topic is unfamiliar to me so I'm refraining from officially voting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: I don't know to what extent its  or , but to the extent that it is, can't we make an exception? Certainly seems the sort of article that one would expect to find in an an encyclopedia. Adds to the sum of useful knowledge in the encyclopedia, does it not?. Do we really have to get rid of articles like this but keep "Phineas & Ferb's Summer Vacation" or whatever? If so, that is demoralizing to readers like me. It's not like the article has an axe to grind or a point to make. It's just presenting facts. And the facts are referenced. Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)