Deletion of Kelley Gulledge

Comment: Okay, received coverage. But  requires "significant coverage", and its not considered "significant coverage" if the guy has never received any coverage outside of the sports sections of the ''Dallas Morning News
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Another career minor-league baseball player.  Now in 9th (or 8th if you don't count the year he apparently took off) year across three different organizations, not including some independent league activity.  He's finally made the AAA level but is apparently 0-for-18 so far this year.  Fails ''the |sensible parts of'' #Players
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:SENSE||WP:WPBB)

Comment: Contrary to widespread belief, the "competitors who have competed in a fully professional league" clause of  does not pertain solely to the major leagues.  This fellow's been an all-star in three separate leagues?  I'd advise nom to reread #Players, because that holds that someone playing in a minor league all-star ''game'' is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:WPBB)

Comment: Contrary to several comments above, I don't see any evidence that he meets the criteria of Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball#Players. He was named to all-star teams of an unaffiliated league, whereas the WikiProject specifies all-star teams of affiliated leagues. (I think even that's too low a standard—I don't think that being named to an all-star team for an affiliated rookie or short-season league signifies "#NEWS|historical notability.")  I've looked at the Google News search cited by Townlake above; unfortunately, I can't read many of the articles because they require an access fee. But it appears that many of the articles are about his high school career and that others involve trivial coverage (such as coverage of individual games). Gulledge has led an interesting minor league career and it's nice to see that he's finally made it to Class AAA at the age of 29.  If he sticks there for a full season, as specified by the WikiProject's criteria, I'll be happy to endorse re-creation of the article. But as of now, I don't think he's quite crossed the threshold of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I agree that it meets  as it stands. However, there has been some fairly detailed discussion about changing  so that minor league types don't get notability. I view doing well in the minor leagues as the equivalent of getting "best calculus teacher in local college" -- not something we should put on Wikipedia. Notice that all of this guy's references come from baseball fan sites, none from more traditional reliable sources. If it weren't for the more heavily contested provisions of , he'd fail  by a mile
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE||WP:BIO)