Deletion of Greg Koukl

Comment: Greg Koukl and Stand To Reason fail . Many, many hits across multiple media (they're in the media business, after all), but all that I could find a things written by them, references to their books in footnotes or passing mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He has Google News hits, but almost all that aren't behind a pay wall only briefly mention him or announce an upcoming speech. The only news hit that could qualify is from the http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-apologist-dissects-ethics-behind-artificial-life-cloning-29220/ Christian Post and it is an interview, so it is not independent.  There needs to be reliable, significant coverage (per ) and I don't see it.  Per Northamerica1000's arguement via , you need to read quote in context.  Just before the quote, it says a person "has been the subject of multiple published..."   Then as you quote, "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial..."  The person has to be the subject of the articles first. If there are alot of articles are about the subject, but they don't go in depth, then you can use 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Greg Koukl and Stand To Reason.  Both lack reliable independent secondary sources  to establish notability as required by  and  or .  The various Google hits are all trivial mentions, falling far short of the substantial coverage required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:CORPDEPTH)