Deletion of Cimmeria (Conan)

Comment: as a topic that has insufficient coverage in reliable third party sources to meet the |general notability guideline. Fan journals and officially licensed guides are not sufficiently independent of the material to be |reliable for all but the least controversial material. This is also an unlikely search term, but I wouldn't object to a redirect if it helps produce a consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: It is worth noting that Conan wikia/fandom's page on this (https://conan.fandom.com/wiki/Cimmeria) seems to overlap with ours; it is also likewise unreferenced (correction: it is actually referenced to Cimmeria (poem), which is more than what we can say about our current pitiful excuse for an article...). Anyway, deletion of this article will not affect anyone, since people searching for Cimmeria will find this in-universe entry there easily anyway, and there at least it doesn't look so out of place as on Wikipedia. As for those wanting to keep this article here, I still wait for someone to show that there are sources that allow us to have any kind of analysis/reception of this. If you think you know of such a source, please provide a quote here than shows said analysis, because  are not cutting it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)

Comment: The nominator has not followed  because it seems apparent that they have not considered |alternatives to deletion.  Apart from articles about Conan and its authors, there are also several other articles about Cimmeria.  As the material is quite complex, it's best to keep this aspect separate for clarity and simplicity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)

Comment: to Conan the Barbarian, per Piotrus all sources are either from unreliable sources or are nothing but in-universe plot description. The sources found by Toughpigs clearly do not cause this topic to pass GNG, and it's association with Conan does not make it notable per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: to Hyborian Age#Nations and landmarks. There is no  for this location and it's already discussed at Hyborian Age as the main article for the Conan setting. I see the delete comments and they're right that the target isn't well written either. A merge is fine but would need a rewrite. A delete wouldn't be that different from a redirect since the real search term is Cimmeria which can be pointed anywhere
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)