Deletion of Lori Douglas

Comment: As a higher-level judge on a regional court, she appears to pass  in terms of notability. Though I agree with the above, it may be appropriate to protect the article to some extent to help sith existing BLP issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Possibly consider renaming to '''2010 Manitoba judicial sex scandal''' to make the article less |BLP-sensitive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP: BLP)

Comment: Before this scandal came to light, she was deemed suficiently notable as a |judge, and she seemed to fit into the same category as most of the other relatively recently appointed judges of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba#Current Justices|Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba.  You can reasonably discuss how much of the recent material ought to be included, but do the recent events make her less |notable than she was a weeks ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BIO)

Comment: WP:BLP1E in no way cancels any notability that she and her peers on the court enjoyed previous to the news reports of a sex scandal. She had an article for years before the lurid stuff came out in news reports. There is a whole category of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Canadian_women_judges Canadian women judges and scads of articles about judges at or below the level of her office. The fact that these article generally do not get nominated for deletion may be because there is a consensus to keep articles about judges of a certain rank. Try a group nom of all 45 or so biographies of Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba if you think there is no consensus for notability such as via . Don't just selectively delete when some http://news.google.com/news/story?q=%22lori+douglas%22+judge&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=d4hzIDHw_iN_e8Mfe4whA84LY9v3M&hl=en&ei=f7d-TNHWHIj_nQeD_vTvAQ&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CBsQqgIwAA unsavory news comes along about one. The bio does not appear to violate 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:UNDUE)