Deletion of Nathan C. Gianneschi

Comment: Clear pass of rof
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Passes #C5 for holding a named chair, and probably passes on other points as well since people don't get named chairs unless they've ''done'' something
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: As the Jacob & Rosaline Cohn Professor of Chemistry, Materials Science & Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University, the subject meets notability criteria established at . ("5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Yes, grad students shouldn't write about their advisors, but he passes . I forget whether FRSC is one of the selective ones enough for #C3 but it doesn't matter when we also have C1 and C5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: based on my reading of hundreds of such stubs, this almost certainly this was written by |a grad student of his. That having been said, |it's not terrible, brevity being its saving grace, and as a named chair in major research university and 4,000 cites, he passes PROF
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:TNT)

Comment:  does appear to be satisfied. But I think that  is giving a free ride for a lot of articles without any satisfaction of . I would expect that some other people should have written about the subject or their work. Currently none of the references here show notability in the  sense. So  should be rewritten, and thousands of articles on academics should then be deleted because they have had no impact. That opinion however has not been checked against this subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)