Deletion of Naga Chaitanya

Comment: Article can be linked to by 4 other articles. Familial ties are considered much more important in some countries than others. Notability has been asserted, and reliable sources exist. There seems to be nothing offensive, self-promoting, or irrelevant about the information. Although Wikipedia is not a crystal ball , there seems to be no reason we can't stay a little bit ahead of the curve on a good bet (especially one formatted so nicely and reffed so cleanly... it would be a shame to have to recreate it in a few months when the movie is released). If the film is canceled, it wouldn't be a problem to re-nominate it. Would the nominator consider instead a refimprove template, or a future events template, in the spirit of inclusionism? Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)