Deletion of Resting bitch face

Comment: Zero improvement found compared to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitchy Resting Face|first nomination for this topic under another title; I don't care if JAMA has a four-year study on this condition ready to go in the future, this relies mainly on junk science about the condition and mainly observational stories about the topic which are under different scientific terms, and the rest are still sourced to fluff tabloid garbage, a 'sigh, this term exists' mention in the ''New York Times'', a joke YouTube video and listicles like the last nom. There should be '''no''' pictures posted in this article as this is a  nightmare if a rep for a figure mentioned in it finds out about it. It's no wonder with articles like this our feminist renown definitely isn't high by any means
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: or '''merge''' to facial expression.  This is a  and a content fork.  No need for a separate article.  It is also a highly misogynistic concept used almost exclusively to demean women (though, apparently, also targets the occasional black male
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: The topic comfortably passes , and as such, qualifies for a standalone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)