Deletion of Independent Soldiers

Comment: Per your first linked source, that is the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy. The article was originally published in the Kelowna Daily Courier and, presumably, reprinted with permission from that newspaper. No copyright violation here—none with respect to Wikipedia, which is what we care about. It's common for newspapers to permit non-profits and companies to re-publish their own news articles. Regarding your second linked source, that ''may'' be more useful as it provides important and substantive background information on this otability|notable British Columbia gang, but I haven't yet integrated it into the article. I've added a number of sources, all of which establish its otability|notability in a significant way. We're up to 7-10 sources, but more are definitely possible
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: There is well-documented, |reliable and independent press coverage from CBC News, Postmedia-owned newspapers, The Globe and Mail, the Kelowna Daily Courier, and the like. I've added two sources and rewrote much of the second paragraph. Does this article need work? Yes, but |AfD is not cleanup. {{ping|Bearcat}} is involved in a number of noteworthy Canadian-focused articles and ''may'' have an opinion, or be able to cite additional WP policies and/or sources that established otability|notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:N)

Comment: I am seeing coverage in reliable sources. We have some cleanup issues, however .  is also relevant, since it was once notable it will always be notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:NTEMP)