Deletion of Conservative Christianity

Comment: and improve.  On the plus side, the article is well written, well sourced, well thought out, and does define the term as the author sees it.  On the other hand, it feels like the term is defined, with the sources, as a little bit skewed by the author's own view - in short, there appears to be some |bias problems in there.  I cannot justify a delete !vote for a little bit of bias, however, let alone even a weak keep, when the large pool of available editors could do some nice work on this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: While I don't agree that the article is well sourced presently, there are ample sources to fulfill the |notability requirement. This is just the plain fact of the matter. And this coverage is independent of Christian Right.&ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)