Deletion of Kingsmead Technology College

Comment: The article has at least one claim to notability: its Investor in People status.  I'm not familiar with this award.  I'm surprised to see so many citations for so many ordinary things: a name change, the appointment of a new deputy education director, an exchange program, being rated Satisfactory, a new gym and money for grounds, a play, absenteeism statistics, and so forth.  It's hard to |assume good faith for the addition of these sources, which appear to be added purely to inflate the apparent notability of the article.  Still, the article has content and at least some kind of a claim, so I'd be reluctant to delete even if the award turned out to be as common as I suspect it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: Quite a well improved article, well sourced with multiple secondary and independent sources used, hence passes  in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)