Deletion of Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association

Comment: WP:ORG should be considered here, in particular . This kind of organization tends to have their output reported by independent sources; ''Variety'' does it for this organization http://variety.com/2009/film/awards/dallas-critics-float-on-air-1118012834/ here and http://variety.com/2001/film/awards/dallas-crix-pick-traffic-1117791461/ here. Not sure if that is enough to get beyond a very brief, incomplete stub
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: Notability established by the cited sources I Talk:Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Association#WP:DEPROD|highlighted when I deprodded this: http://www.dallasobserver.com/news/dfw-film-crix-very-social-at-years-end-7142215 Dallas Observer and http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MH&s_site=miami&p_multi=MH&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=11653C2BB3DCFE28&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM Miami Herald. This coverage clearly goes beyond the awards if that is considered a notability requirement (I'm not sure where that idea comes from). The Miami Herald piece directly addresses the nom's  complaint
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)