Deletion of Marjorie Wee

Comment: Senior job at a large company is not one of the  guideline criteria... no other assertion of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: For a large, notable company, I would not ''automatically'' grant notability to any employees except the one or two most senior officers. Otherwise, there most be some other assertion of notability to meet the criteria of , and that's missing here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I've looked through all of the information, and while the companies are notable, I can't find any information on the subject other than the fact that they worked for the company. Any information on the article would end up being |original research because it can't be |verified. If anything, I think it could redirect to the relevant company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: Ay yi yi... , , sockpuppetry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NN)

Comment: per nom, AED and others above. To the person or people who keeps repeating "WHY DELETE?": please read the policies linked to multiple times above. '''That's why'''. Please stop asking and make an argument if you are going to. Also, please read and understand what |sock- and meat- puppets are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)

Comment: per , , , and . (See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Marini
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NN||WP:V||WP:RS)