Deletion of Otello (López Cobos recording)

Comment: note that it also fails '''''' and ''''''. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: frankly, i am surprised that such an experienced editor (hi {{u|Softlavender}}:)) would nominate so many articles without any apparent  , anyway, another album that easily meets  with numerous reviews
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NALBUM)

Comment: Meets the criteria of . It has multiple reviews. In addition to several in ''Gramophone (magazine)|Gramophone'' over the years and ''Stereo Review'' (all already cited in the article), there's one in the ''New York Times'' https://www.nytimes.com/1979/09/30/archives/new-disks-for-the-opera-lover-new-disks-for-the-opera-lover.html and a one paragraph entry in the ''The Penguin Guide to Recorded Classical Music'' (rated "Outstanding" and the ''only'' entry for that opera). It was broadcast in its entirety on WXQR https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_ugCAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA83, and excerpts on other NPR stations. e.g. https://www.vpr.org/post/rossinis-otello-0 and on the BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00hr4sr and Radio France https://www.francemusique.fr/emissions/musicopolis/gioachino-rossini-a-rome-milan-et-naples-en-1817-1-5-60074 to name a few. It is also the first full-length recording of an important work. The criteria from WikiProject Classical music cited in the nom is merely a WikiProject essay, unlike those at  which is Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|an official guideline. As for potential copyvio issues in the "Reviews" section, that can be truncated to simply listing the reviews and re-expanded later. The entire article doesn't need deletion, if the subject is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:NALBUM)

Comment: per . The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. As the first major recording of the opera, the album is of fundamental importance to the history of the work. See ''Opera'', December 1979, p. 1167; ''Opera Now'', November/December 1998, p. 43; ''The Musical Times'', May 1980, p. 323; Clyde T. McCants's ''American Opera Singers and their Recordings'', 2004, p. 365; ''Music and Musicians'', Vol. 28, 1979, p. 32; ''Classic CD'', Issues 32-43,1993,  p. 10; ''Ovation'', Vol. 1, 1980, p. 37; Matthew Boyden and Nick Kimberley's ''The Rough Guide to Opera'', 2002, p. 177; ''The Penguin Guide to Opera on Compact Disc'', 1993, p. 369; ''The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs and DVDs Yearbook'', 2004, p. 315; ''The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs'', 2001, p. 1092; ''Die Bühne'', Issues 244-255, 1979, p. 256; ''Records in Review'', 1981, p. 261; George Birnbaum's ''Classical CD Scout'', 1996, p. 277; ''BBC Music Magazine'', Vol. 3, Issues 1-6, 1994, p. 136; ''The Opera Companion'', 1983, p. 14; Charles Osborne's ''The Bel Canto Operas of Rossini, Donizetti and Bellini'', 1994, p. 357; ''The New Yorker'', Vol, 55, Part 8, 1979, p. 81; ''Stereophile'', Vol. 24, Issues 7-12, p. 145
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)