Deletion of List of apologies to China

Comment: This |technically abides by the rule for significant coverage, but looking at this as a reasonable person, it seems to be a |well-meaning but |intentional fork of the One-China policy|One-China Principle, written as |an essay that gives |undue weight to the concerns about insults. The page also attaches a |list this is a catchall for different things - sovereign and corporate apologies, and responding to both intentional insults and accidental gaffes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:AGF||WP:FORK||WP:NOTESSAY||WP:UNDUE||WP:LIST)

Comment: Isn't the article written with political motives and lets say could be related to 2019 Hong Kong protests. I wonder why Wikipedia should apologise to China because its China who blocked Wikipedia. Maybe Wikipedia could also be included in the list. We should comply with 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I have a feeling that this article might be a , and possibly not following . It also doesn't help that the article lists figures and groups who have "apologized" to China along with Chinese companies themselves (which of course are generally going to be "pro-China
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per . Whoever created this travesty of a list should apologize to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)