Deletion of L/L Research

Comment: The issue here is whether ''LL Research'' is notable per . I am not at all convinced that it is (I find very few independant sources that even mention it, and then only in passing.  I also question whether any of the few third-party sources that do mention are reliable), and so I am leaning heavily towards '''Delete''', but keeping an open mind.  As for the article content, I agree that some of it could probably be merged into Mediumship and/or Ancient astronauts (and similar articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: sources cited appear to be marginal-to-. Also should consider deleting article on their film The Hidan of Maukbeiangjow, as it lacks ''any'' third-party sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The reason we require mainstream coverage is because, without it, it's impossible to follow , particularly with fringe views only discussed by proponents. Either you allow the article to violate NPOV, or you |synthesise some rebuttal, violating |the "No Original Research" policy. So, if we cannot write the article in line with policy, we shouldn't have the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)