Deletion of Richard Hughes IV

Comment: because he fails  as he has never been elected to a high office.  However, the argument that he shouldn't have an article because other members of the state board he was a member of don't have articles is a weak argument.  If the post itself is notable, he deserves an article as do the other members.  The fact, in this case, is that the post is not notable enough, per , so none of the members of that board are notable simply because of their membership on that board
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN)