Deletion of Barry Schwartz (technologist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: This AfD is being |canvassed offwiki: https://plus.google.com/107945426404682361496/posts http://steveplunkett.amplify.com/2011/09/19/wikipedia-srsly-pubcon-rishil-rustybrick
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: and that page is a publication designed specifically for search engine marketers.  That publication has got a page on how to spam on Wikipedia by http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2066183/How-Small-Businesses-Can-Get-a-Link-from-Wikipedia How Small Businesses Can Get a Link from WikipediaYou get a general idea of the market it supports and it makes the  pretty obvious that advise it gives about Wikipedia editing isn't without commercial motive behind it, such as clever, concealed placement of . So we've seen self statement of "routinely interviewed by experts" a whole bunch of links within his *own* website, but not multiple, unrelated,  with significant coverage. Have you seen otherwise??? Would you find editorial from Kate Kaye from industry advocating publication ClickZ to clear , and ?  Even on technology issues, I don't see these small publishers to be on the same level as Reuters, TechCrunch, wired
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:REFSPAM||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:POV)