Deletion of Richard Carrier

Comment: What is the criteria for notability? According to Wikipedia:Notability (people), it has nothing to do with whether the man has an impressive CV or if you think the website he writes for is famous or not. The criteria is whether there has been enough external notice from '''intellectually independent sources''' so that we can write a |verifiable and |neutral article without having to engage in |original research. Sources that establish notability are things like: http://www.answeringinfidels.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=86 a critical response to his book, http://home.ca.inter.net/~oblio/CarrierComment.htm a response to his review by Earl Doherty, and  http://www.tektonics.org/qt/rubicon.html a mention on the apologetic website "Tektonics". These are the kind of stuff that establish notability because they are completely independent of the subject, and independent from each other, and therefore can help us write a neutral account of his views
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: As Carrier often debates outside the infidels forum it would be POV to include all his links there. I'm considering attempting to flesh this out a bit but we have had horrendous problems in the past as this guy is positively hated by some Christians and we run into  issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)