Deletion of Simone de Gale

Comment: Not enough coverage in third-party, independent sources.  Seems like a bright person with lots of potential but it's  at this point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: the sourcing does not constitute |significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. Also note that a major contributor to the article (with few edits outside this subject) has tried to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simone_de_Gale&diff=prev&oldid=766709608 suppress the discussion on this page by striking out contributions from IP editors (whose arguments have exactly the same weight as anyone else's
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The refs provided are either routine biography pages or junky trade magazines. References are therefore not wide, independent and of high quality-- in fact they are of very low quality.  Additionally, this person's claim to fame is that she a) has an architecture practice and b) invented a single material that resists blasts, both of which are fairly normal items without significant (Think The Guardian) sources to back them up. Without these significant references, the coverage is basically routine. The subject therefore does not meet . I did trim some of the advertorial language from the article, but it is still a thin article notability-wise. The closing admin might want to take notice of the red-linked SPAs above that seem to have a special interest in this page.Special:Contributions/198.58.162.176|198.58.162.176
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)