Deletion of Chris Crocker (Internet celebrity)

Comment: Crocker is, for better or worse, clearly notable and has been the subject of multiple, substantial coverage in the mainstream media. There is not reasonable argument that he fails to meet . This should not have been nominated for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: If it ever applied to any article at all, |notability is not temporary absolutely applies here. Article meets  in abundance. The nom brings forth content issues which are innapproriate for AfD. This article needs cleanup, but is not 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:NOTE||WP:HOPELESS)

Comment: and address the article's , ,  and  issues separately.  I see your point in regards to , but Crocker is just too prominent in popular culture to be ignored.  I ''do'' think there is lasting historical value here, in that this is an iconic example of the YouTube phenomenon.  When Time magazine named "You" as the PotY, they were talking about phenomena like this.  (''Speedy Keep'' is not out of the question here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:OR||WP:OWN||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTNEWS)