Deletion of List of places known as the capital of the world

Comment: As stated by our guidelines: "The potential for creating lists is infinite". Hence, we have rules and Wikipedia content policies on stand-alone lists are clear on this. The claims to be capital of the world is not an appropriate topic for a list per . A claim like this is not something broadly accepted, and a list of those claims is all but neutral. So, I think the list format is not the good one for this topic because a list affirms things without giving to the readers the essential informations suchs as why this topic is controversial, why the history of a given city led a lot of people to consider it as a "capital" of something.... So under its list form, this article is pointless because it  will be subject to unexplained additions with doubtful sources. Hence, I really think this article will benefit from the advantages of starting from scratch and from being written in proper English, with complete sentences, in the form of a real article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: This article does not provide any valuable information. I don't see the meaning of "Capital of the world"? This auto-awarded title does not relies on a legal or uncontroversial ground. Hence, it is purely subjective and violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)