Deletion of Ronen Segev

Comment: After long deliberation, I can only come to this conclusion. The only reason this person is notable is over the PriceLine incident, which isn't all that notable to begin with. On top of that, there are not enough ''non-trivial published works'' to convince me that he passes . Musicians are a dime a dozen, and they are bound to have at least a handful of ''non-trivial published works'' throughout their career. But that still doesn't make them notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Harassment/legal; This Afd was created by either a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sgroos meat/sock of ''someone'', perhaps the subject or Reputation Defender. There has been no harassment of anything or anyone in here, and this appears to be a nom being supported tied into the fact he yelled at someone at the Foundation. We routinely put in comments about "issues" with people on articles, but we do censor them out if the person happens to yell at someone over the phone at WMF about it? If so are we going to whitewash? There was at last version "1" sentence about his arrest in the article, TRIPLE sourced to  sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Jimbo's opinion notwithstanding (incidentally, I agree with him when he removed some items of tabloid interest from the article), this does seem like a notable pianist and performer with performances in several locations. I think the New York Times coverage is not trivial, and the other media mentions mean that the person passes . The current stub looks valid enough, discusses his music and performing career only, and has no major BLP concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)