Deletion of Threadneedles Hotel

Comment: per  - a peek through sources finds |significant coverage, including thse noted by {{U|Cunard}} and  https://www.google.com/books/edition/Moon_Living_Abroad_London/mwQrCgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Threadneedles+Hotel%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT100&printsec=frontcover reliable https://www.google.com/books/edition/Fodor_s_2012_London/EFjP8rPXT4kC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Threadneedles+Hotel%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA314&printsec=frontcover tour https://www.google.com/books/edition/Fodor_s_London_2020/DqbDDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Threadneedles+Hotel%22+-wikipedia&pg=PT245&printsec=frontcover guides. AfD is not for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: WP:Run-of-the-mill  is an |essay and "''Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community''".  The nomination's other assertions are false as the subject clearly passes  as the place has been "''officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage''".  The claims by others that there are too many such places is contrary to policy as  clearly states that "''there is no practical limit to the number of topics Wikipedia can cover
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY||WP:NBUILD||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1079129 Listed building, so notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)