Deletion of Kate Wilson (scientist)

Comment: I have added two books and a primary source reference. Her actual training is as a Molecular Biologist and a Marine scientist|Marine Scientist (I added that to the into). I see that her study of bacteria is applicable to agriculture and her work is referenced in https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=Dr.+Kate+Wilson%2C+molecular+biology several books so that the subject meets the criteria for #C1. I am inclined to Keep. The article was sourced entirely with a primary source, however, and  exists as pointed out by other editors in this thread
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:RS)

Comment: I think this is a good example of |article content not determining notability - David Eppstein has showed there are reliable sources that would enable her to meet . I agree though that the article is in a poor state and needs fixing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN||WP:PROF)

Comment: The article is currently in very sad shape (easily a BLPPROD if the inappropriate inline links are removed), and I don't have time to clean it up myself. But searching Google Scholar for author:kate-wilson finds heavily-cited publications that look like hers, leading with a single-authored paper "Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria" with nearly 2000 citations. So if the article reaches an acceptably cleaned up state, she may well pass #C1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)