Deletion of Krishna Reddy (artist)

Comment: Good job by the voter above to find the very obvious evidence of notability. For the nominator of this AfD and some other people who claim that articles should be deleted, I think we really need to emphasize . If an article currently has no sources, that is NOT a reason to delete it. Instead, encourage the community to search for sources, because their absence in an article is NOT proof that they do not exist at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: as the additional reliable sources identified above show that the artist has received significant coverage in reliable sources and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Did the nominator try doing a  on this article? That's rhetorical because if they had, they would have found https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/ruminations/2016/workshop-and-legacy-krishna-reddy-a-new-form this profile article on the Metropolitan Museum of Art's (the MET, NY) site, this http://www.thehindu.com/2000/04/09/stories/13090072.htm article from The Hindu, his http://www.sunypress.edu/p-410-intaglio-simultaneous-color-pri.aspx book published by SUNY press, this https://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/plumage/intricate-intaglios-in-kolkata/ Blog post in The Times of India,  this http://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/nature-of-his-work/ review in The Indian Express or this https://books.google.ca/books?id=uXIyAQAAIAAJ&q=Krishna+Reddy+artist&dq=Krishna+Reddy+artist&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjT9vyzyqnZAhVC34MKHb5SDF0Q6AEINDAC catalogue for his retrospective at the Bronx Museum of the Arts. It is pretty clear that notability is established here, as he is repeatedly mentioned in these sources as an important artist who has earned a spot in the history of Indian printmaking.Special:Contributions/104.163.148.25|104.163.148.25
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)