Deletion of Doing time, Doing Vipassana

Comment: Nomination was made incorrectly per a claimed failure of  "" when the topic is not an essay and by content and context was easy to discern it was actually about a film... one which passes .  And Mark, I declined your speedy issues are |being addressed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY||WP:NF||WP:ATD)

Comment: A |bit of looking finds this film covered in |multiple independent sources: http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/FILM-CLIPS-Also-opening-Friday-2632429.php ''San Francisco Chronicle''  http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-06-28/film/film/ ''The Villaqe Voice''  http://movies.nytimes.com/2005/07/08/movies/08doin.html?_r=0 ''The New York Times''  http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/doing-time-doing-vipassana ''Slant Magazine''  and others linked through http://www.metacritic.com/movie/doing-time-doing-vipassana/critic-reviews ''Metacritic''.  Point here being that we rarely delete notable topics if concerns can be addressed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)