Deletion of Sarah Marie Johnson (2nd nomination)

Comment: I agree with the nominator, that this subject is not encyclopedically notable and generally fails . I also agree with Worm that  and  are huge, glaring problems. So is , on which I reach the opposite conclusion that Babba apparently reaches: there's nothing previously notable about those involved, the murder was in fact not unusual in and of itself, and the entire 1E is of extremely low historical significance. The event did bring some coverage simply because it was a parricide (notice the quality of coverage generally: 5 pages toward the end of a 286 page book, in a short story format; crap true crime TV shows; and a smattering of news coverage). This is more properly commented on, but certainly not so much as merged into, parricide. This name space should not be simply redirected
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: Seems to pass  now, and the "Murder of..." is a more appropriate title for the article rather than using the name of the perpetrator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or '''Merge''' per all of these , ,  and  it should not have its own article. Same as the guide for crime perpetrators above says. By all theses guidelines it should be deleted or merged into Parricide both of them are stubs. This would not be in a set of encyclopedias and is not encyclopedic content on its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:PSEUDO||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: reluctantly, with the new name. I nominated the article the first time and since then the references have improved sufficiently to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)