Deletion of Cultural linguistics

Comment: per  A thousand hits on Google Books, and more importantly, a thousand hits on Scholar. My condolences to the nom for having been offered to buy something, but a nomination to delete an article should be based on a little more than being peeved at an Amazon link someone added to an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: having books, especially textbooks and course materials, indicates that sufficient |reliable secondary sources exist to create a decent article on this subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Palmer 1996 calls Cultural Linguistics a proposed new field; Sharifian and Palmer 2007 call it a new field. This does exist, it seems to differ somewhat from either of its "parent" subdisciplines cognitive linguistics or linguistic anthropology, and at least the contributors to Sharifian and Palmer 2007 claim it as a research specialization. Discussion should probably relate to whether this constitutes |notability, and if not, if the information could be merged to cognitive or applied linguistics or ling-anth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)