Deletion of List of Islamic terrorist attacks

Comment: The article is indeed in need of work. It is a |list; it seems that it must be inherently a synthesis of similar items in accord to the main article on the topic: Islamic terrorism. That not all items on the list satisfy the criterion isn't reason to delete the list but to improve it. Of course, that would take considerable effort and debate on the talk page should be directed to that effort
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L)

Comment: I am sure here and now the list has problems and it can be, in general, a can of worms. But as far as we keep it down to notable attacks that multiple reliable sources have linked to Islamic terrorism, then it is perfectly fine, and such a list can be done. Therefore the fact that some editors use OR or synthesis to put stuff in the list is a problem that is not ''intrinsic'' to the topic. Such issues can be fixed by editing, and as such |are no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: I'm just an another person who is amazed to see these experienced editors !voting "delete" here. The list simply meets |general notability guideline (150+ RS, how much more do you assume it would be needing to reach GNG?) and the list includes notable attacks that they do have a standalone article itself and are attributed to reliable sources. List_of_Islamic_terrorist_attacks|Visit the article page to confirm. The nominator argues #Synthesis as a reason of deletion (I do not see any other blue links there), which does not match any of the #Reason|reasons of deletion laid by |Wikipedia deletion policy. Well, we have a  here. Many long standing editors and administrators did follow the same, "as per nominator" (WP:SYN and neutrality is disputed). While, "inappropriate-title" as a reason of deletion was entertaining. Almost all keep reasons here, are , ,  or simply . "Neutrality is disputed", "at some instance verifiability fails" and "contains OR" are not reasons for deletion. The article, if includes such, requires discussion on the article's talk page, if needed a RfC, therefore clean-up not deletion!! eletion is not cleanup. |Wikipedia is NOT censored. The article meets GNG and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:DEL||WP:DEL||WP:DUCKSEASON||WP:JUSTAVOTE||WP:PERNOM||WP:MAJORITY||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:D||WP:NOTCENSORED)