Deletion of PureVolume

Comment: This article in the LA Times explicitly discusses the site:http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/824729311.html?dids=824729311:824729311&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Apr+21%2C+2005&author=Christine+N.+Ziemba&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=WEB+NOTES%3B+11+million+fliers%2C+no+posting%3B+Bands+can+beat+the+Kinko%27s+jam+by+using+websites+like+MySpace+or+PureVolume.&pqatl=google. In depth article in Boston Globe all about the site:http://www.boston.com/business/personaltech/articles/2005/12/26/website_links_indie_music_with_new_fans/. USA Today already mentioned:http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/music/2005-03-09-internet-jukebox_x.htm. Article in Pittsburgh Post Gazette discusses online music in general and PureVolume in more than passing:http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06221/711968-96.stm. Brief mention in Newsweek:http://www.newsweek.com/id/45863. It has ''hundreds'' of other news mentions, and is mentioned in the same breath as MySpace and MTV. It is obviously notable; if it weren't notable, why are there so many news stories about bands being on it? I'd ask people to get better at Googling before you nominate articles for deletion or vote delete; AfD requires a good faith attempt to find sources, see . I'd not heard of it before this AfD, perhaps someone else can work these references into the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)