Deletion of Johann Ge Moll

Comment: This is the sort of article that  was written to address. No reader of the encyclopedia is served by this article, and no editor should be tasked with trying to disentangle this knot of jargon. Blow it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: The article's references do not support a claim of notability and my own google search found nothing to show he meets any notability standard, including the GNG. The article is by an SPA (?) and uses lots of puffery instead of solid evidence--"known by his works on ...","build the new way of thought, sensibility and cognizing", "rises to popularity during the 1990s", etc. There's no evidence he's notable for his poetry or philosophical writings--or anything else
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO)

Comment: I agree with {{u|Sandals1}}, this article is full of |weasel words that are so ingrained an entire rewrite is necessary to make it comply with |NPOV.  As for the notability, the lack of secondary sources and independent coverage suggests Moll fails |BIO, so deletion is in order anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WEASEL||WP:NPOV||WP:BIO)