Deletion of Metz Accord

Comment: Some of the references are in French, but  states they should not be discounted and therefore we may not be seeing the "entire picture" of what the author(s) are saying.  Also, the bibliography demonstrates a large number of references, and you have not displayed neutral discourse to the specific validity/invalidity of any of them, but instead refer to the entire process as "junk."  When we look at "conspiracy theory", let us not forget (and I include this specifically not to offend anyone, but to demonstrate the misperception of guilt/conspiracy that are often held hand-in-hand) that Pope Benedict XVI was conscriped into the Hitler Youth in his early years, but that in no way supports any prior fidelity or current ideological belief.  We all may not like every entry into Wikipedia, but saying  and calling it a "conspiracy" does not support the argument to remove the material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NONENG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Even with the few sources mentioned by User:Howcheng, I still don't see it receiving "significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject" (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)