Deletion of Donald Michael Kraig

Comment: Per , if the author's works are not worthy of notice, it is very likely that the author isn't notable either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: In my opinion he meets as a person who is '''regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors''' and '''is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.'''  Yes, OK, it's in a wierd subject, but his entry in Raven Grimassi's significant "Encyclopedia of Wicca and Witchcraft" http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kzp63ep-MlQC&pg=PA242&dq=%22Donald+Michael+Kraig%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=PNinUKeTL9SY0QWF1oG4BQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Donald%20Michael%20Kraig%22&f=false is an indication of his importance among his peers. Regarding Qworty's statement about the discography, it isn't actually against the rules for the owner of the record company to write the discography, as this is purely factual (he did cut those records on that label). Claiming that they were the best thing since The Beatles would be promotional. Also, referring to that RfAR from 2007, when Rosencomet (a) wasn't sanctioned and (b) was instead sent round at the time to remove any spam, seems a tad unnecessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)