Deletion of Jake Presutti

Comment: per  the person is not yet notable and sorely lacks any kind of mention by non-trivial sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: As has been established above, Division I basketball players from an elite program like Syracuse are specifically and clearly notable per , as the team receives significant third-party press coverage both locally (Orange basketball is arguably the biggest team in upstate NY aside from the Buffalo Bills|Bills and Buffalo Sabres|Sabres and gets covered accordingly) and nationally. This should be enough of a reason to keep. Additionally, another good piece of supporting evidence is that we cannot attempt to define who is a star and who isn't. Like Chengwes alludes to, it raises POV issues to say that player X is more notable than player Y because, in essence, the coach plays them more. As long as they are both on a college basketball roster, X and Y are equally notable from an objective standpoint. We cannot delete articles based on us as fans speculating whether or not a player is a "star" or if they will be drafted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: the starters.   I personally know that Devendorf is http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Eric+Devendorf%22 pretty notable.  '''Delete''' the players who havent seen significant time, especially the walkons.   Also, '''Delete''' the assistant coaches.   So basically, I'd say keep the ones that averaged http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaab/teams/sci/stats;_ylt=AnhbmmzKpOETDGcdZyI_5YDp07YF 20 minutes or more.   states that "Competitors who have played or competed at the highest level in amateur sports."   NCAA basketball ''is'' the highest level of amateur basketball
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)