Deletion of Otfried Deubner

Comment: the subject has a de.wiki article which seems convincing for notability: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otfried Deubner; there's also a plausible pass under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: It's easy to get hung up on the institutional criteria of NPROF, but the fact that Deubner's work is still cited and discussed half a century on (see e.g. PK650's references) is a clear sign that he was a notable scholar per #C1. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Per good arguments by {{u|DGG}} (de-WP and NPROF#5 angle), and also  and .  I can't see a real reason to delete this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: Rejecting an offer of an endowed chair is an interesting career move. If he had accepted it, he would likely be notable under #C5
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)