Deletion of Rijeka terror attack

Comment: content into Rijeka. Lack of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There are plenty of sources here, they just aren't listed in the footnotes.  also plays a role here, since attacks in small US cities have taken place and are duly noted, but an attack that took place in the third largest city in an European country doesn't generate as many English language sources and as many intersted editors on the English Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: content into Rijeka or Croatian War of Independence. That there are other articles on other terrorist attacks is irrelevant. To various comments above, I'd reply that we must bear in mind that  and especially  apply. BTW, it is also irrelevant that the article is badly written. That can be cleaned up if consensus is to keep. The question here is whether this incident is sufficiently notable to be worthy of an article on its own. In my view it is not
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AADD||WP:OSE)