Deletion of Bryce Retzlaff

Comment: Clearly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Yet to play a senior game. That he is on the list and might play a game is |crystal ball thinking. If he does play a senior game this article can be restored and updated (I'll happily do that myself as I have done for other AFL players making their debut). Till then he hasn't satisfied the  guideline, specifically the Wikipedia:Notabilty (sports)#Australian rules football|Australian rules football section
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: to the List_of_Brisbane_Lions_players#Currently_listed_players_yet_to_make_their_debut|player list or team page, because the  is not met - no significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  That is more important than WP:ATHLETE or NSPORTS and should be the guideline used in the coming weeks when the inevitable articles are created on players selection in the 2010 AFL Draft.  Recreate when significant coverage is gained.  I think that redirecting is a better outcome, as it makes recreation upon meeting GNG easier for those of us without a mop, and also keeps the likely search term active, and prevents duplication of article creation.  It's what we do for Freo players (ie Ashley Clancy who were delisted without playing a game, no reason why it can't apply to some listed players too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)