Deletion of Unforgivable Trilogy

Comment: The problem is  ... note that both Numa Numa and The Juggernaut Bitch!! cite sources, like a New York Times article ... so far, all of the claims of "widespread popularity" are merely unsubstatiated rumors ... if there were '''''any'''''  citations, we probably would not be having this discussion ... finding and adding some will be the only thing that can save this article from deletion. &mdash;{{user|68.239.79.97
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:RS)

Comment: as per comments from 68.239.79.97 above.  AfD makes no comment about whether the video is "good" or not, or how legitimate it is. It purely looks at  and I find that based on what has been said here and my own looking around, it fails this criterion. AfD should not look at how well the article is written, either - this is purely about whether or not the subject should have a WP article.  Right now, I do not think it is notable enough, and #Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball | WP is not a crystal ball. If it becomes notable in future, then an article could be developed. (It would help if you signed your comments using ~~~~ at the end
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOT)

Comment: along with Hodge-Stansson Productions -- There are no |reliable source citations to establish the |notability of either, and as for it's potential notability, |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, nor is it the place to "legitamize" (sic) anything ... anyone can put their wedding video on YouTube and then sell DVDs, but that does not make it worthy of an article here, unless more than one reliable publication (''i.e.'', not just blogs) reports on it as being newsworthy for the sheer number of sales ... see Wikipedia:Attribution. &mdash;{{user|68.239.79.97
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL)