Deletion of Dong Sheng

Comment: I think the editors who did most the work to this article are separate people, but likely have conflict of interest. (evidenced by saying they had permission to copy a website into the article, which was a copyvio (see edit history). I cannot conclusively confirm any of this meets , however since the main source is a 2000 year old Book of Documents|book I can't find a translation of, I am undecided on it either way. (although citing a 'Private Edition of a possibly self-published book as a secondary source is suspicious) Additionally the 'organisation' is pretty sketchy, even if the philosophy is genuine there are  issues
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:PROMO)