Deletion of Galle Gladiators in 2020

Comment: for now except the list of umpires and captains which probably shouldn’t have been bundled here. I’ve asked the nom above and am waiting for a response, but citing  from what I can gather is not assuming . My reason for keep though is  which all these articles pass
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:GOODFAITH||WP:SEASONS)

Comment: The list articles for each franchise teams based on 2020 clearly meets  and . The LPL tournament is brand new as the inaugural tournament started in 2020. The list articles all have covered the basics such as the summaries of each and every games. If the tournament happens for two or more continuously we can stick with these list articles in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: although the series is brand new but sources confirm the next season to be held in July 2021. https://www.islandcricket.lk/news/lpl-will-be-back-better-and-stronger-next-season/ https://www.thepapare.com/lpl-2021-to-feature-a-franchise-from-east/ https://www.islandcricket.lk/news/slc-promises-a-bigger-and-brighter-lpl-season-2/. The article passes the notability according to . It's not a content forking as the main article presents information about "all" seasons whereas the 2020 article presents information about only "one" season. COI would be valid if anyone of contributors would work for the league. I doubt User:Churot may be working for LPL 😂. How does it seem to be COI? Could you explain? Regarding PROMOTION, it would be valid only iff we were promoting the subject but all the informations present in the article are sourced, though mostly from ESPN Cricinfo. It's written according to NPOV. I see no advertising, advocacy, propaganda and promotion in the whole article. At last SPAM comes, which says {{tq|Spam is the inappropriate addition of content to Wikipedia with the intention of promoting or publicizing an outside organization, individual or idea, and is considered harmful to the encyclopedia.}} So, can you point out where the article is being promoted or publicized? I see spam nowhere. No spamming external links, no advertisement and no references promoting the subject or author. So, all the issues of the nomination are baseless and pointless
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASON)

Comment: ping|User:GenQuest}} Can you explain how exactly the article fails  and ?  states contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships and I doubt
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:PROMO||WP:COI)

Comment: First, all the 5 articles pass the notability according to . I don't know similar articles of other leagues also exist for a long time but they are not deleted. For example, Islamabad United in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. Lahore Qalandars, Karachi Kings, Peshawar Zalmi, Quetta Gladiators, Multan Sultans in 2016, 17, 18, 19, 20. Plus, Mumbai Indians, Delhi Capitals, Royal Challengers Bangalore, Kolkata Knight Riders in 2010, 2011, 2012,...., 2020 and much more. All are present. Then why not these? What more I've to say is that the 2020 team article shouldn't be merged to main team article because 2020 team article contains an overview of only ''one'' and ''particular'' season whereas the main team article contains information about the overview of ''all'' the seasons. So, it's not a content forking as the main article presents information about "all" seasons whereas the 2020 article presents information about only "one" season. COI would be valid if anyone of contributors would work for the league. I doubt User:Churot may be working for LPL 😂. How does it seem to COI? Could you explain? Regarding PROMOTION, it would be valid only iff we were promoting the subject but all the information present in the article are sourced, though mostly from ESPN Cricinfo. It's written according to NPOV. I see no advertising, advocacy, propaganda, promotion in the whole article. At last SPAM comes which says {{tq|Spam is the inappropriate addition of content to Wikipedia with the intention of promoting or publicizing an outside organization, individual or idea, and is considered harmful to the encyclopedia.}} So, can you point out where the article is being promoted or publicized? I see spam nowhere. No spamming external links, no advertisement and no references promoting the subject or author. So, all the issues of nominations are baseless and pointless. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASON)