Deletion of Timewave zero (2nd nomination)

Comment: Uncle G showed why this article is appropriate in the second deletion debate linked above, and his arguments have not been refuted.The nomination contains one of two serious errors, depending on how you read it.  Either the nominator's argument is "let's merge this to 2012 doomsday prediction"—in which case this is a clear case of |speedy keep ground 1 without further discussion—or else it's "This article is bad, and it's getting worse, so let's delete it" which fails .  See also {{tl|sofixit}}.Either way, it's a speedy keep, under ground 1 in the first case or a snow failure of  in the second case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE)