Deletion of Fandom Wank (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not ''a single'' reference from anything even remotely close to a |reliable source. The article asserts a good deal of notability, and this is supported by "Fandom Wank" getting almost 300,000 Google hits, with (exactly) 500 of the first 1,000 hits being unique, but again, all of the hits I saw were message board posts and blogs. In addition, and what ''really'' convinces me that this is insignificant, is that it's hosted on a freeweb service that itself is not notable enough (FYI: Alexa rank of 63,593) to have its own WP article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Possibly notable (at least in some senses of the word), but doesn't look like it's |verifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Your argument against referencing primary sources is not valid, as  allows for such.  The only thing prohibited through  is posting work in Wikipedia that would result in Wikipedia being referenced as a primary source.  No such material is presented here.  Tell us what you want documented, and it will be documented.  If the mainstream press and textbooks were the only things referenced, it would mean that Wikipedia would be a much less robust encyclopedia--most articles on Internet phenomena would not be present
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OR)

Comment: article fails to be |verified by |reliable sources that would 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:WEB)

Comment: No references whatsoever outside of LJ and similar fan sites; fails  miserably. Note to closing administrator: There are several "votes" here from socks and accounts that only show up for deletion discussions, not citing reasons why this belongs on an encyclopedia or responding to reasons in favor of deletion. A similar, though less egregious thing happened with the previous AfD that they are citing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails  and lack of notability through |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS)