Deletion of Tallulah Supercat

Comment: I think I'm the only Brit who has commented so far on this AfD, and in 1974 I would have been just the age for the target audience for these records. But I've never heard of them, and forgive the  argument here, but there really aren't thousands of dewy-eyed 40- and 50-somethings up and down the UK reminiscing nostalgically about Tallulah – I suspect you'll struggle to find anyone in Britain who has heard of or remembers these albums. I'm not denying there were some big hitters involved here –  within the music industry Ken Howard and Alan Blaikley were well-respected composers of pop songs (including no. 1 singles) and TV theme tunes, and Leslie Crowther was a very familiar face on TV for several decades as a family entertainer. But I don't know what evidence there is of notability, or the proof that "such has been the success" of the albums – that just sounds like record company hype to me. They didn't chart, although to be fair, they may not have been eligible because in 1974 budget albums were excluded from the main chart. But the two singles didn't chart, and there's no evidence of a BPI certification either. I don't share {{u|StrayBolt}} and {{u|Squeamish Ossifrage}}'s confidence that these records would have got any attention in national newspapers (although if anyone has access through Highbeam or similar I'm happy to be proved wrong), and I don't believe there were any magazines around at the time regarding children's media – it would have just been reported in ''Music Week'' in a very similar style to the ''Cash Box'' article above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IKNOWIT)

Comment: to Leslie Crowther. To be honest, I suspect that enough sources do exist to justify notability here. But 1970s British newspapers and periodicals with a focus on children's media are not exactly imminently searchable online. Regardless, however, the topic is already addressed at Crowther's article (not that ''it'' doesn't need some work, too), and, because these are real, are plausible search terms. Additionally, that respects  in case adequate sources are evident in future
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)