Deletion of List of United States Presidents by longevity 2nd nom

Comment: Please look at #INFO number 9.  Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: except '''weak keep for List of oldest Surviving members of the House of Representatives|Senators''' This is pure |trivia. The longevity of a person in power is but a biological fact, and is not entirely relevant to what they did, or how they did their jobs, except when the holder has died in office, but these are exceptions which are usually dealt with in the individual subject article. There is no reason I can see except to fulfill the anal obsession of certain editors to sort everything by every imaginable criterion. The only clear exception I see is the case of monarchs, whose reign is invariably linked to their longevity. The dates of birth and death of each president, chancellor, prime minister is already included in the individual subject article for anyone who is interested to look it up there. I support the retention of the long-lived senators because seats tend to be stable in many cases, and it appears to be a lot more common for these politicians to expire at the same time as their terms. wiki is #DIRECTORY|not a directory of every characteristic of people in power. Watch out, well be seeing articles on the longevity of the world's richest people next
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:NOT)

Comment: Why do I bother, this is major bias.  Considering withdrawal per heavy bias.  I invite people to read #INFO again though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I agree with the .  Look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Noble Prize in Peace winners by longevity|this AfD, notice the amount of keep here to the amount of keep there, yet it's for exact same method of sorting the people
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: This http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=longest+living+u.s.+presidents+-wikipedia&btnG=Search Google search turns up all kinds of reliable sources indicating notability of topics like these, including BBC News, Infoplease, ABC News, CBS News. Many |reliable sources keep track of these things, there is no reason why Wikipedia shouldn't
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: from #INFO, number 9: Statistics. Long and sprawling '''lists''' of statistics
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: These lists are in accordance with wikipedia's policy on compilations. It's useful, almanac style information. It is in keeping with . It is neither indiscriminate, nor of interest only to a very restricted number of people. Deletion of these lists would be an abuse of the listcruft poliy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LISTS)