Deletion of Fluxus at Rutgers University (2nd nomination)

Comment: Sources already in the article (e.g. from ''The New York Times'' about Fluxus in New Brunswick) and other sources in articles and books available online, which are in depth and on topic, all demonstrate that this is indeed a notable intersection. I had no trouble finding the sources using a tool called "Google" and offer my thanks to {{u|Theredproject}} and our IP editor who were able to find these sources and add them to the article. I can't figure out why we allow nominators to get away with failing to search for sources, improve articles as an alternative to deletion and meet the obligations of , a problem that infects AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The nominator should have done . I randomly picked three claims in the article, and was able to add a reliable source for each, with ease. Lots of sources out there. Special:Contributions/198.58.161.137|198.58.161.137
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)