Deletion of OpenProj

Comment: a ''possibly'' notable software. The administrator's decline of the speedy request was bizarre, because the article declined speedy was nothing more than a rant about previous deletions and the possible pro-Microsoft tendencies of the people who deleted it. It has now been edited as a one-line stub; and there are sources cited. However, the sources merely claim that the software has been launched. otable states that objective evidence of notability may include "'''Substantial''' coverage in reliable sources" ''(my emphasis)'' - a small handful of stories repeating a press release claim is coverage, but not substantial coverage. It serves to prove that the software exists; but not that the software is notable. As the notes on the notability guidelines state: "''adverts, announcements columns, minor news stories, and coverage with low levels of discrimination, are all examples of matters that may not be evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation, despite the existence of reliable sources.''" However, '''IF''' more reliable sources can be found; and '''IF''' the article can be expanded then it should stay. At the moment, it is only notable because it intends to "replace" a Microsoft Project|Microsoft software (which is itself, not notable, and I've flagged that article with a request for sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)