Deletion of Beer-In-Hand (2nd nomination)

Comment: as per #Articles, A1.  If it survives SD, then '''Delete''' as per /, / and #Problem articles where deletion may be needed, row 2, as .  This is a non-article, with no verifiability, and appears to have been made up by college kids recently.  Concur that a vague mention in a list of drinking games (which isn't even cited in the "article" anyway, so of no relevance here) isn't verifiability in any meaningful sense.  Re: above comments &mdash; WP:BOLLOCKS, WP:BULL and WP:SNOW are not actionable, and neither right now is WP:N (it is Disputed).  If you're going to comment for deletion, folks, at least make sure the critieria you choose are meaningful in the AfD/SD context.  :-)  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NFT||WP:OR||WP:DP||WP:NEO)

Comment: WP:N|non-notable, |non-verifiable, |unsourced |original research article on a drinking game |made up in the pub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOR||WP:NFT)

Comment: wikipedia is not for something you Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_for_things_made_up_in_school_one_day|made up one day, without sources this falls well into WP:BULL country, no relevant http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22beer+in+hand%22+%2Bpool ghits that I can see. I'd suspect that this could easily be speedied with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: unless |sources are provided
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)