Deletion of Isabel Bigod

Comment: References, to the extent I can check them, appear to be database listings and short of "in-depth" coverage, which leaves this article technically short of .  I'd cut it enough slack to stay over the line were it not for two factors.  First, in my experience, the reliability of individual genealogical entries in databases is often overstated, editorial oversight is weak.  This creates a  problem.  Secondly, and yet confirming the first point, the veracity of of much of what has already been said was called into question 100 years ago based on what one reliable source described as conflicting sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: and/or redirect to an appropriate topic. Joe Decker's verifiability concerns are convincing. Also, the sources givens seem to be of the genealogical variety, and given that the article does not tell us anything about the person except genealogical information (and it is not Wikipedia's purpose to be a genealogical database) it appears that there is insufficient in-depth coverage about her as a person in order to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)