Deletion of Okopipi (software tool) (4th nomination)

Comment: owing to a lack of |significant coverage in |reliable sources. The SecurityFocus, TechTarget, VNU and CNET articles cited as sources are all dated May 2006, which makes this a classic example of a topic that was a |mere short-term interest only
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: non notable software that fails all requirements of  for lack of significant independent coverage. Apart from agreeing with this well written nom statement I also agreed with {{noping|power~enwiki}} after I read all the previous AfDs. The second and third AfD largely resulted in keep not because of policy or guidelines-based reason but because of the faulty argument that since it passed AfD before the it should be speedily kept ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)