Deletion of Steam World (2nd nomination)

Comment: See also my other rationales for keeping the other related Railfan journals AfDs for rticles for deletion/Live Steam & Outdoor Railroading (magazine), rticles for deletion/Live Steam & Outdoor Railroading (magazine), rticles for deletion/The New Electric Railway Journal, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Today's Railways. I don't feel that notability is absolute.  If something is notable in a notable field, provided that field is non-trivial, it's notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:A||WP:A)

Comment: Putting every Rail magazine up for AfD is hardly a good faith effort and looks like a case of  as well as .  As noted in the last AfD, according to W H Smith, this is "Britain’s best selling historical railway magazine" http://magazines.whsmith.co.uk/Magazines/General-Interest/History-&-Knowledge/Steam-World.cfm, easily satisfying #5 of otability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals ("significant publication in ethnic and other non-trivial niche markets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:POINT||WP:N)