Deletion of Alison Miller

Comment: Student awards are not relevant for  and she's too junior to have attained the impact necessary for #C1, so we have to rely on  instead. But I've found and added some sources to the article that I think should be sufficient for GNG: two in-depth articles in Wired and a local newspaper, and a name-check in the New York Times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: She is named-checked http://books.google.com/books?id=wDGvzY5-cAoC&pg=PA71 here, for example, and there seem to be plenty more sources which demonstrate that she has been noticed.  Worst case is therefore merger into some list of maths olympians and so, per our |editing policy, there is no case for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Certainly a promising graduate student, but come back in a few years when there are more substantial accomplishments.   looks for more distinguished achievements than winning a student competition, which is not the "highly prestigious academic award or honor" required.See the section of  which lists the Nobel Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, or the MacArthur Award. Note the section which says "Victories in academic student competitions at the high school and university level as well as other awards and honors for academic student achievements (at either high school, undergraduate or graduate level) do not qualify under Criterion 2 and do not count towards partially satisfying Criterion 1." No evidence the person is a major force in the field, with widespread influence, or academic accomplishments at all comparable to being a "Distinguished Professor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)