Deletion of List of Dungeons & Dragons halfling deities

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: per  and . Per the article talk page, at least 5 articles have already been merged here as the result of previous merge/delete discussions.  While the individual entries themselves may not be deserving of their own articles, inclusion in a list such as this one should not be an issue.  If the problem here  - as it certainly seems to be, based on the arguments supplied for deletion supplied above - is the '''content''' of the article (in other words, ), then edit the article.  AFD is not cleanup.  And  is another term for , which is not a legitimate argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: More excessive fancruft sourced mostly to primary sources. Aside from the notability arguments outlined above, this content puts way too much |undue weight on fictional trivia. I suggest Wikia would be a better home for this type of content. And I'm not sure about the accusations of bad faith here: were I to suggest some editors derived malicious pleasure from diluting Wikipedia's useful content with sewage or burying it under a mountain of trash I'd be facing a pitchfork mob at ANI for sure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: There is no evidence that "Halfling deities" as a group have any sort of real-life significance. Just because they are a part of a notable game |doesn't make them independetly notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)