Deletion of Aboleth

Comment: non-notable subject which fails . "Significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" is required, but the only sources are either completely dependent of the subjects, or completely trivial and insignificant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This sounds like an  nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The article is not sourced enough to prove its notability. Per , the article needs "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", which it does not have, and which no one here has brought yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: somewhere. Yes, it is (partially) sourced, but it's still a un-of-the-mill D&D creature that seems to lack any in-depth third-party sources () and non-trivial real-world information (, publication info is trivial). Nothing that demands a separate article. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:WAF)

Comment: per SPNic; this is one of the most blatant cases of  I have seen in a while. As for the assertion that none of the references are independent, reread the reference list: the last two entries on the current reference list are not affiliated with TSR/WotC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)