Deletion of Nim (programming language) (5th nomination)

Comment: Searching around for "nim programming language" I have found at least the following sources which I believe meet , https://www.theregister.com/2019/09/24/nim_version_1/, https://www.infoworld.com/article/3440522/nim-language-reaches-10-status.html, https://www.infoq.com/articles/got-nim/, https://hackaday.com/2018/09/25/nim-writes-c-code-and-more-for-you/, https://sdtimes.com/softwaredev/new-surveys-provide-insight-into-programming-languages-nim-and-clojure/. The article is definitely far too long though and I would support trimming it. This AfD seems to imply that "And now some of the fans are spamming it into the "see also" of all the other computer languages." is a reason to vote for deletion, surely that should be moderated separately and have no bearing on the decision here. Also, the page views metric quoted in this AfD is plain wrong, this article in fact gets significant traffic (over 200 views per day https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=all-agents&redirects=0&start=2015-07-01&end=2021-01-31&pages=Nim_(programming_language
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)