Deletion of Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering

Comment: to Upper ontology#DOLCE, where it is briefly discussed. A Gbooks search reveals that DOLCE has brief mentions in some ontology guides. http://www.disi.unige.it/person/MascardiV/Download/DISI-TR-06-21.pdf A Comparison of Upper Ontologies discusses DOLCE in some depth, seems independent, and as an academic technical report, is semi-reliable. These sources aren't enough to reach notability threshold per , but they are enough sourcing to support a brief section on the upper ontology at Upper ontology#DOLCE. As this is a plausible search term, a redirect is warranted. I agree with W Nowicki that transferring some of the sources, or the tech report above, to the target article would strengthe the section, but a full merge would expand the section to one of undue weight. Hence, redirect now and selectively merge as desired seems best
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)