Deletion of Police invasion of UCT campus

Comment: cannot find any evidence of notability through news, news archives, books and google searches (failing |notability guidelines), it also has a serious lack of POV|neutrality. &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per nom. This is my first pass of the article, and I feel that none of the issues/problems noted previously have been addressed. I feel that the article's title, and its highly emotive tone are unsuited to WP. The article needs to be rebuilt from the ground up with clearer context or a better documentation of the origins. As it stands, there is only the Cape Times as a source, and details are scant due to censorship. The Cape Times as a source makes a big deal about not being able to publish certain details and photos. However, after looking at the NYT article, I feel that at best this is just another storm in a students' teacup to protest a military cross-border raid. All the rest appears to be |speculation. I propose that the incident be written about in the UCT article, and later expanded into a separate, neutrally titled article as and when appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I rarely speak up for the deletion of any article. I believe this subject probably deserves an article, but this isn't it. Lack of  and |POV problems abound, starting with the  title. We have a single source, admittedly unreliable by the virtue that it is censored. We have a complete lack of context where I can't even tell which students use the "upper campus." I would recommend somebody userfy this one and recreate it under a more appropriate title later
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV)

Comment: I lack enough knowledge of the subject to comfortably give an opinion of its viability, but if kept it most certainly must be retitled, as the current title is a violation of  as it indicates an opinion as to the event. Suggest an alternate word like "raid" be used instead. Also UCT means nothing outside a small region; the name should be spelled out in full
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as a |highly biased article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Fails . The resources on the article are not reliable. The article itself is poorly written and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NPOV)