Deletion of Titstare

Comment: once notable, then something will almost always be notable.  This thing passes . "Wikipedia is not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)

Comment: Plenty of sources worldwide in major publications. A little review, possibly contacting the article creator and looking at the talk page either  or at least after nominating a new article for deletion, please? I checked before starting the article that mainstream major media reliable sources are still discussing this a year later.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/technology/technologys-man-problem.html?_r=1http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-08-07/silicon-valley-tech-entrepreneurs-behind-the-stereotype  The notability is for being a piece of Internet culture, not as an app. As for why the article is named after the app, not coining a name for the controversy, that has to do with  and other MOS issues. If someone adds a "gate" and the name sticks, we can use that name. TitStare Boob Controversy would not e a good name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: When the two footnotes showing are substantial coverage from ''The Guardian'' and ''The New Yorker,'' we are already done, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)