Deletion of Kashif Siddiqi

Comment: Can't fathom any plausible reason to delete this.   isn't a justification
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I hate to sound like a broken record but |wikipedia is not censored, and we don't want to set a dangerous precedent of deletion at the subject's request. This is ''exactly'' why the Italian wikipedia was threatened with complete closure – a proposed new law in Italy which would have obligated any publisher to retract information regarding any living subject at the subject's request, regardless of truth. Since the nomination statement actually admits the subject is notable, I don't see what further discussion can achieve here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: Per . If we start removing information on notable individuals at their whim, where does it end? Do we delete any negative information about a living person because they want it deleted, even if it has been amply reported elsewhere? Deleting this would set the dangerous precedent that article subjects |own their articles - they do not; if the information is available in reliable sources, it should be available on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:OWN)

Comment: Article is adequately referenced, in a good state, and passes  and . There is no reason to delete it. &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)