Deletion of José Martínez Gázquez

Comment: I found a couple newspaper stories on his honorary doctorate (one added to article). I think that gives a weak case for #C2, and that his numbered membership in the Reial Acadèmia de Bones Lletres de Barcelona and associate foreign corresponding membership in Société des Antiquaires de France go some way towards #C3. I also found a fair number of reviews of his edited works, and fewer (but nonzero) of the authored ones. So the case is weak, but present, along multiple lines of notability beyond trying to divine what citation numbers in philology mean
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: given they appear to broadly satisfy , but should be tagged as poorly referenced! Also noting the extremely weak notability criteria for sports persons I am biased towards inclusion of biographies of academics who actually contribute to advancing human knowledge, as opposed to simply being known for kicking a ball around a muddy field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: In my view, receiving a Doctor Honoris Causa from a university ''can'' be a potential sign of notability, as per , which states that subjects are likely to be notable if they meet any of the standards listed there, including point #1 of , "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times". Of course, this does not guarantee notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)