Deletion of Eugene F. Lally (2nd nomination)

Comment: Lack of sources that estiblish sufficient notability for inclusion on WP in accordance with . Agree that there has been no substantial improvement since the previous deleted version. User:DDG's comments from the previous AfD are compelling and have not been addressed ("The fact that I would not expect many references in Web of Science, but I find only 1, ( CONCEPTUAL SPACECRAFT DESIGNS FOR EXPLORATION OF JUPITER Author(s): LALLY EF Source: ASTRONAUTICA ACTA Volume: 11 Issue: 4 Pages: 219-& Published: 1965_ and it has never been cited by anyone. As far as I am concerned, that falsifies the claims in the article that he has a significant role, except perhaps as a technician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Someone appears to have put a great deal of work into this, and the fact that it still doesn't meet  means that it probably never will
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)