Deletion of Tara Reade

Comment: While Tara Reade has no notability on her own, she may have a impact on certain states in the upcoming 2020 United States Presidential Election. Besides, this has similarities to the Brett Kavanugh sexual assault allegations in 2018, and considering that Joe Biden is a major presidential candidate, and that Christine Blasey Ford, has her own page, it definitely makes sense to keep. For those of you using  as an argument against, it was never ruled out, just needing extra caution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: to Joe Biden sexual assault allegation per . Only notable for that one event, no reason to have this seperate article that is essentially just a content fork
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: snd}}No otability|Notability beyond this one event. I checked the references section in the article, and this is what I found
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per  and perhaps  as well. She has no notability beyond the allegation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:SALT)

Comment: Reade is not notable per , though the Joe Biden sexual assault allegation ''is'' notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: As I previously wrote at Talk:Joe Biden sexual assault allegation when not aware of the discussion here, "Tara Reade does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies (see Wikipedia:Notability (people)), while the subject of the allegation does meet the general article criteria. That means we should stick to the subject and only discuss those parts of Reade's life that are related to the allegation by the body of reliable sources on the subject (see ). The rest of Reade's biography is not suitable for its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:BALASP)

Comment: to Joe Biden sexual assault allegation, that is where all of the current notability of the article is coming from. Tara on her own doesn't meet 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Her role is very significant within the one significant event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: This appears to be the sixth attempt or so to rename the Joe Biden sexual assault allegation article. Everything relevant about Reade is already included in the allegation article's background section. Also citing  per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. None of her other life activities have been |notable enough to warrant an individual article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: almost falls under the criteria for  to the letter. Strip the allegations against Joe Biden out of the article and there's nothing left
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: as it stands, if you take out the "allegation of misconduct" section (which already has its own article), there's nothing notable about her. Classic case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Most of the content of this article duplicates the material in Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. The scant biographical information that is relevant to her sexual assault accusation and noteworthy can be merged back into that article, provided that there is consensus to do so on that article's talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)