Deletion of Pat O'Donnell

Comment: There is coverage in reliable sources but I think that this is only temporary notability and that this falls under . If there is anything that should be included it should be merged into Shell to Sea rather than being in a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: if its for "soapboxing" then I suggest  not delete it. What is the rationale behind deletion, is it based on notability, unreliable sources etc? I remain unconvinced because I dont hear a reason to actually delete it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:FIXIT)