Deletion of Finland–Slovenia relations

Comment: for lack of independent coverage of the relationship. Lists of agreements and visits, without any hint of ''contextual'' relevance, violate ; they don't describe a phenomenon as such. As for the Patria case, well, see Patria case for that, I guess - no need to duplicate content like this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: I'm not really seeing any evidence that this topic has received "|significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", and thus we shouldn't have a stand alone article on it. I've searched and the closest thing I could find to a source that "addresses the subject directly in detail" is a story on the Patria case, which I've added to the article. But for establishing notability, the source is http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/close,_but_no_cigar close, but no cigar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails , has not been subject of significant coverage in  secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS)

Comment: Does not meet , it has some coverage, but not significant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)