Deletion of Alexander Stingl

Comment: Stingl is a recent Ph.D. without any evidence presented of the impact needed to pass  #1. The article goes on at length about his academic work, normally a good thing compared to manyy of our academic biographies which only recite the bare facts about someone's career, but the length together with the lack of third-party references makes me think most of this discussion is likely |original research. As for the bio-civics article, there's too little on that phrase in Google scholar (only http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=biocivics two uncited papers by Hindmarsh) to convince me that it rises above 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:OR||WP:NEO)

Comment: Doesn't meet  or  as far as I can determine. Only citations are personal websites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: both. Subject passes neither  nor . Articles (both) created too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)