Deletion of Robert Kennedy in Palestine (1948)

Comment: While the article has a difficult bar to climb for notability and other issues, I'm willing to give it time. I see nothing so irredeemable about the article that it needs to be deleted within a day or two of its creation. That said, #NEWS, , and  weigh strongly here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: The article is being attacked with a hatchet by some  attempting to remove the POV from the article.  However the POV is not  Mbz1's or any WP editor's opinion, it is the well-documented opinion (POV) of  RFK.  We cannot remove it simply because we | don't  like it.  The opinions are ''his''. By complaining that they are cherry-picked and deleting them from the article, the editors are not Whitewash (censorship)|whitewashing and ensor|censoring opinion from WP. The BBC has said that RFK's support for Israel was "well-documented."  Consequently the quotes will reflect that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:C)

Comment: as a |synthesized #ESSAY|essay on a young RFK's opinions, and speculation on how they may have been the reason for his assassination.  The (weak) attempt to frame his assassination within the context of the ol War on Terror doesn't help matters any, either.  Salvage anything useful and use it in the main pages on RFK or the assassination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOT)

Comment: Appears to be more of poorly written #ESSAY|personal essay  than an encyclopedic article covering a notable event.  Also plagued  with POV issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Poorly sourced, POV rant #ESSAY|personal essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)