Deletion of Vanna Bonta (3rd nomination)

Comment: That there are major promotional and verification issues in this article is obvious, and the ''vast'' majority of sources cited within it are either not independent or secondary (and thus not useful for establishing |notability in particular) or are simply not |reliable sources for use on Wikipedia in general.  Those sources and the many (often dubious or not terribly encyclopedic) claims which they support should be removed.   All of that being said, there remains a small core of useful and acceptable sources which do establish a level of notability sufficient to support the article.  But good luck to whoever has to wrangle the content into consistency with our policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: just as before, there is nothing here to meet  in general, or any of the subsidiary guidelines. The prior discussions AfD were so laden with nonce arguments by new and |single-purpose accounts that other editors deemed it appropriate to remove the content as a courtesy to the subject. Subject's self-promotional efforts were as inept as always. I regret the death of any human being, including hers (assuming as implied above that she is dead); but even fewer |reliable sources seem to have noticed her death than noticed her in life
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG||:WP:SPA||:WP:RS)