Deletion of Gatis Lagzdiņš

Comment: I wish we could get rid of this article about a little-known troll but you can't dismiss the current references as published in "unreliable tabloids". Sky News and BBC are perfectly respectable and even Metro (British newspaper) is not ''that'' bad. If we are going to delete, I think the argument has to be made on  grounds and the lack of depth in the coverage (although the Metro piece is more than a passing mention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per , , , , and . We almost always delete YouTubers. Anyone with a iPhone and a personality can upload or download videos and call themselves a vlogger, but very few are notable. They are run of the mill. We are especially wary of people who try to use us, a charity, for their own agenda, whether a fringe theory or advocacy of an issue. Nobody would reasonably expect a person advocating such to interrupt a Girl Scout/Guides group's meeting to lecture them on their ideas; likewise, we are not a soapbox. The lack of significant, ongoing coverage about this person, as opposed to a single protest reported in a single news cycle, shows this person is not notable. She appears to be unwell. We are not  a support group
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:MILL||WP:FRINGE||WP:SOAP||WP:SIGCOV)