Deletion of Tom McAlpin (2nd nomination)

Comment: I commented on the previous AFD and still feel the article should be kept.  Why are some editors so intent on removing it?   Whether it passes the strict |notability guidelines or not, the article is useful to those looking for information on McAlpin.  The information in the article is sourced and accurate.  What is the harm in keeping it?  If space was an issue on Wikipedia, I'd agree that it could be deleted. Many people in history may no longer be considered notable, but in the interest of those doing research in the future, we don't delete their mention in the history books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Please read “Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#It's useful” and “Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#It doesn't do any harm”.  I would be about as happy to have this article brought up-to-snuff on |“notability” as to have it deleted, but it seems reasonably clear that it's ''not'' going to be brought up-to-snuff.  If you have a legitimate challenge to , then I suggest that you ''produce'' it, rather than questioning the ''motives'' of another editor
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE)

Comment: Your original comment noted that he was ''mentioned'' in three non-Disney publications (a short blurb in a travel-jobs newsletter; a brief announcement that he would be speaking at a College of Business; his in-house profile at Make-a-Wish); a small number of ''mentions'', even by |“reliable sources”, isn't sufficient evidence of |“notability”.  And, while the edits subsequent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom McAlpin||the last AfD discussion may have been improvements of ''some'' sort, they do ''almost nothing'' to address the issue of ''establishing |“notability” with |“reliable sources”''.  If someone says that a building is ''structurally unsound'', one does not point to subsequent improvements in ''the electrical wiring'' as if they addressed the complaint.  Where are the |“reliable sources” that treat him as '''notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:RS)