Deletion of Robert B. Davis

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Article needs more thorough sourcing but this looks like a pass of #C8 (founding editor of a journal which is arguable notable although we have no article on it), of #C5 ("New Jersey Professor of Mathematics Education at Rutgers University"), and plausibly also of #C1 (heavy citations for "Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics" and "The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages") and #C7 (through both the effects of the Madison project on elementary-level education can be documented and his work as mathematics advisor to ''Sesame Street''). And the nominator's rationale seems to boil down to "people cannot be notable for being professors" which is just incorrect. The primary nature of the sources is irrelevant to academic notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per  - based on what's in the article right now, he passes PROF and/or AUTHOR. Good work by {{U|David Eppstein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: Passes multiple criteria of , when even one would be sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per the comments above and, I am tempted to say, per nom: "only notable as a university professor." We do have an entire notability guideline, , dealing specifically with notability of university professors. I have added a ref to the subject's bio in the 13th edition of the American Men and Women of Science (the source is mentioned in the Phil Church's bio of Davis and I looked it up using my university library online access, although the item is currently behind a paywall.) In addition to  I believe the subject passes  as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)