Deletion of Richard Stern

Comment: Broad coverage in |RS including interviews in which the subject voluntarily particpated and  |notability is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: How do we know that the person alleging to be the subject is truly the subject? This goes beyond . If someone wanted another's article deleted that would be one way to go about it. Perhaps the subject is happy to have a bio here and is unaware of this discussion? I just went through this same thought process with Christopher Cuddy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: It doesn't appear to pass . Perhaps a small listing at List of YouTube celebrities instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: Within the lead of  is the statement: ''An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is "do no harm"''.  At times like this a judgement has to be made.  Certainly we'd never delete the article of a national politician or an international superstar on request.  However we can ask these two questions.  Is WP harmed if there's no article on Richard Stern?  I'd say no.  Is Richard Stern harmed by the existance of the WP article?  He says yes.  Therefore let us ''do no harm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)