Deletion of MacFarlane's bear

Comment: Found In https://books.google.com/books?id=NuFfCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=guinness+world+records+2016+MacFarlane%27s+bear&source=bl&ots=HYnYcvhXkN&sig=ACfU3U3s5-vafb2TwBUQnAtPHzmvW9XwRg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwja_tOljP3mAhVWHM0KHYVDBcgQ6AEwAHoECAwQAQ#v=onepage&q=guinness%20world%20records%202016%20MacFarlane's%20bear&f=false Guinness World Records 2016 Page 182 of the book''Rumors of Existence: Newly Discovered, Supposedly Extinct, and Unconfirmed Inhabitants of the Animal Kingdom'' by Matthew A. Bille. and many more. . 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE||WP:ATD)

Comment: cite book|author=Dufresne, Frank|year=1991|title=No room for bears|page=121|url=https://archive.org/details/noroomforbears00dufr/page/120}} has an interesting single paragraph. {{tq|They Canadians remember well the case of the "Patriarchal Bear" named in 1918 by our C. Hart Merriam on the basis of a single, unique lower second molar found...was for many years hailed as a valuable scientific contribution about an exceedingly rare creature...following scrutiny...cross ''Vetularctos'' off...}} Content for an article somewhere, how much is needed to go against  for standalone? Some background and references https://thelordgeekington.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/the-patriarchal-bear/ here&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES)