Deletion of FluidVM

Comment: This is yet one of these software stubs, the description is barely 1,5 lines, the tone is NPOV, factual, and encyclopedic.  Perfectly |verifiable. Wikipedia would do its readers a service having this stub.  The technical offense here is if it violates the notability guideline, I repeat, it's a guideline, not policy.  A Google search for ''FluidVM'' returns 1,000+ hits.  The software has certainly been able to generate very widespread discussion.  It's mainly specialist blogs, and some of them seem to have editorial oversight, i.e. what would 10 years ago be sort of a ''column'' in some sort of specialist magazine.  I havent sifted through all of the hits, but I would say some do approximate |reliable sources.  More importantly, it wasnt such a big deal to find a Gbooks hit where the software is given a quite extensive treatment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)