Deletion of MarineMeat (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Opps. Missed the 1st AFD, else I would have opined there. The article will benefit from cleanup, expansion and proper sourcing per . While  is always a  consideration for stub articles, the continuing coverage over several years shows it to not be only a simple blip on headlines, with the instigation resulting in more stringent gidelines governing Marine's behaviors. This moves it from news to something more enduring. The CNN cite in the article is only one of many available. My http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2009&q=porn+investigation%2C+29+Palms&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=porn+investigation%2C+29+Palms&lnav=od&btnG=Go search, shows the enduring nature of the investigation and its subsequent repercussions. I agree with BaliUltimate that the article will benefit from a more in-depth expansion, graduating it from news and reflecting the continued coverage shown in sources from 2000... a surmountable issue whose lack is not cause for deletion. HOWEVER... I do strongly suggest a title change to the article.. perhaps Marinemeat investigation, as the current title makes one think the article would be all about the porn website Marinemeat.com, and it is not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: not often I agree with Cyclopia but  .. yeah, , also unreferenced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)