Deletion of Ramón Nomar

Comment: Passes the GNG due to sources identified by GNU plus the two other sources I found. It is irrelevant if an article is based on an interview that a journalist did per . Further, Nomar does not have be "the main topic of the source material" for it to be |significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Though I'm not personally a fan of articles on pornographic actors, the subject clearly has an extensive filmography, thereby passing the  threshold. And the sources that have been provided here make a decent case for  (assuming the Spanish sources are reliable). In response to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: sources presented do not amount to notability under  / . For example, https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=https://elpais.com/diario/2002/03/02/catalunya/1015034840_850215.html This source is largely based on an interview. It starts with ''Nomar, who will notice that it is a poetic name (Nomar is 'Ramon' backwards) compared to the names of other actors in the genre, such as the one of the great Pop Terminator. We meet at the Zurich bar in Barcelona, ​​and when I see him (dressed) it is as if the air had the texture of cheese spread. I get dizzy.'' and so on. The other sources, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2374623816631727 “But What About Feminist Porn?”: Examining the Work of Tristan Taormino, appears to be about somebody else
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ENT)