Deletion of List of video games by daily active users

Comment: even if we put aside , and ; wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is no encyclopaedic value behind "which game was played the most yesterday". Keeping the article is not even in question as the article is not encyclopaedic to begin with. We already have "YYYY in video gaming" (:2019 in video games). A brief note can be added in such articles, based on third party observations. —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per Ajf773. " and . Sources given are based on a single point in time that differs each entry. Unreliable data and requires a lot of maintenance to keep it factually up to date." &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOR)

Comment: per  and . Sources given are based on a single point in time that differs each entry. Unreliable data and requires a lot of maintenance to keep it factually up to date
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOR)

Comment: per -REASON 6: {{tq|Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources, including wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|neologisms, wikipedia:No original research|original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes|hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)}}. This is impossible to source and maintain in a way that would result in acceptable quality for a Wikipedia article. There's a reason we don't have an article called today's weather
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)