Deletion of Tolulope Arotile (2nd nomination)

Comment: Although I still maintain the article should be kept due to the coverage, which clearly meets , I think we should steer away from the "outstanding helicopter pilot" claims. She was a junior officer with no decorations. Her notability and coverage is down to her status as Nigeria's first female combat helicopter pilot. Everyone is always claimed to be the greatest whatever after their death; that's just human nature. She was a combat helicopter pilot. She did her job well by all accounts. So do countless other service personnel. Most of them don't have articles. Many people die prematurely in tragic accidents. Most of them don't have articles. Let's just stick to the actual reasons for her notability and not get carried away with the "she was the greatest helicopter pilot ever" rubbish. It doesn't help anyone's cause
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: WP:ONEEVENT, it appears. While being the first women do to x in country z is interesting, I don't think this is enough, and she wasn't written about until she died. Sadly, outside being the first Xyz and dying she hasn't left any mark on history. I don't think this is enough to get her into the encyclopedia (also, , ). Either way I am also concerned about the copyright status of the picture used which it's claimed to be 'own work' by a not very active user
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTOBIT)

Comment: When I declined the  tag placed on the article by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: That the subject here so clearly and overwhelming meets GNG makes me think that the some here believe that SNGs supersede GNG. They do not. SNGs allow for a subject that otherwise cannot meet GNG to still be considered notable. Further  cannot be applied where there is wide coverage for two distinct events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: fails  and . Being the first X in country Y does not establish notability. Deleted before for good reasons and nothing has changed apart from her dying
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Furthermore I trust {{u|Praxidicae}}’s judgement & general knowledge on Wikipedia as Wikipedia is her forte, so if she says that nothing has changed since the last AFD(I can’t view deleted pages thus I can’t really remember) then it probably hasn’t changed & and as such this article qualifies for a CSD G4. I’m not sure why the correctly placed CSD G4 by {{u|Amkgp}} was 'declined' by the Nigerian editor. A quick glance of the article shows at most they possess |bare notability & as {{u|Johnpacklambert}} correctly put it, people could become more notable even in death. @{{u|Brain7days}} I’d suggest you read  meticulously before proceeding to create anymore articles & even at that, you still may need to pass the article through the  process. Cheers dear colleague
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:BARE||WP:GNG||WP:AFC)

Comment: So much has been said already about this nom, the subject of this article has clearly pass this minimum criteria |ANYBIO and the rational given by these users
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)