Deletion of Citizens for Home Rule

Comment: The article could use a little cleaning up, especially considering the majority of the references are deadlinks. Regardless, even after just a quick Google search it's evident that there is absolutely sufficient news coverage from a variety of independent sources to satisfy the criteria outlined at . https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/politics/state/story/2018/jun/24/political-notebook-activist-seeks-draft-carte/473669/https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/daily-southtown/opinion/ct-sta-slowik-homewood-home-rule-st-0201-20180131-story.htmlhttps://www.northcentralpa.com/opinion/letters_to_editor/open-letter-to-the-voters---williamsport-citizens-for/article_bd106c9c-56b7-11e7-ac01-cb707f63d01d.htmlhttp://archive.knoxnews.com/news/politics/state-sen-overbey-brushes-aside-gop-challenge-to-win-re-election-392e1a8c-b3c4-2f65-e053-0100007f12e-389251451.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: The article clearly meets , as well it had significant news coverage and sufficiently supported by well sourced refs as per other editors above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)