Deletion of List of fictional media

Comment: per  an indiscriminate collection of information.  isn't a reason for keeping. "Useful" is also not a reason unless accompanied by a reason why its useful. Wikipedia is not a collection of everything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: if your writing becomes notable enough for an article, yes. This appears to be the discrimination that you so desperately seek in these articles: that the sources containing the fictional entities are notable in themselves. The statement that if you wrote something down it becomes fictional and can be added to the list is just a fallacious straw man argument. And as I've said in the other AfD's you've commented on: how does #IINFO apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: encyclopedic in its own right, contains useful and valid information, not indescriminate and squarely within . (Could be tagged for , though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:V)

Comment: OT#IINFO, ''just because fictional things exist doesn't mean Wikipedia must list them''. The subject of the article is |not notable AT ALL. It is also completely unmanageable and criterion for inclusion are terribly defined. Hey, I just made up a fictional company and wrote it down. Can I add it to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)