Deletion of Beyblade timeline

Comment: I believe that one list – a timeline – is justifiable for works of art that pass , as Beyblade certainly does. I echo DGG's point about viewing this as simply another (user-friendly and intuitive) way at presenting material included elsewhere
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per other timleline articles - fan-driven content that makes no claims to real-world significance; non-notable & in-universe. Fails |our fiction guideline (Wikipedia_talk:Notability_%28fiction%29#RfC:_Proposing__for_global_acceptance|Please make your voice heard on fiction-related topics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: I can't really tell what this article wants to accomplish in the first place. If it was a clearcut fictional timeline, I'd likely !vote delete for failing #PLOT. Now it's just an extreme in-universe mess of statistics ( and #STATS). &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WAF||WP:NOT)

Comment: as it fails , , and it |is mostly OR and original synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: This looks more like a character list than a timeline - with characters listed by their appearances. Many of characters in the list have articles - and not just the ones linked in the navigational template (Mariah Wong|example) and all of the "teams" have articles. The |list therefore seems to serve the reasonable purpose of navigation. Personally I'm not sure if all the teams and characters that have articles should do, most seem to be poorly written and unreferenced but since they do have a list for navigation seems reasonable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: This isn't a time line, it is simply a series of tables listing "attacks" which fails  in any of its incarnations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: as unoriginal article.  It is hard to fail something that Wikipedia talk:Notability %28fiction%29#Oppose|totally lacks any consensus.  Consistent per First pillar with a specialized encyclopedia on Beyblade.  Plenty of http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beyblade_timeline&action=history editor efforts underway to improve this article.  http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Beyblade%20timeline Sufficient reader interest as well.   is not a valid reason to delete either.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)