Deletion of Picaboo

Comment: I added some additional content and inserted some of the sources I mentioned above into the article. In its actual state, I believe it is a valid stub as there is enough non trivial coverage from multiple independent |reliable sources, it is no longer promotional, and it does not violate |what Wikipedia is not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ISNOT)

Comment: Bloomberg Businessweek" is not ''Businessweek'' but a separate directory service, whereas the content is user submitted. So it adds 0 to notability considerations. ''TechCrunch'' is usually routine funding news. ''New Hampshire Business Review'' is local source, also probably PR driven. I don't see GNG, let alone  being met in this case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)