Deletion of Miriam Schmierer

Comment: Well, it seems that there is a group of editors determined to remove all articles about supercentenarians. I expect you will succeed. I don't find terms like 'blatantly', 'packed with' and 'fancruft' rational - they seem highly emotive. (I had to look 'fancruft' up - I gather it's a term that originated on Wikipedia.) And, like all Wikipedia guidelines,  seems to be applied somewhat subjectively. I would not consider that being notable for a period of two years for one's extreme age, for living across 3 centuries, and for being the last person born before nationhood, counts as 'one event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Being the oldest ''something'' does not make you autonotable. .  &raquo
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: It was not just her age (112 years) that was notable. For the last two years of her life, she was the last Australian living who had been born before Australia became a nation, and she, and her experience of her life, became notable because of that. The List of supercentenarians from Oceania does not, and cannot, record that. She meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)