Deletion of Phoenix Games (2nd nomination)

Comment: As the one mentioned from the talk page, I'm copying my response here for posterity:  I don't think this topic meets the |general notability guideline. These are the best sources I was able to find: http://www.ign.com/articles/2006/10/23/tales-from-the-bargain-bin?page=1http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/news150803budget—both cover the company but don't have nearly enough to write a full article about the company. There are also passing mentions in: http://www.gamesradar.com/talkradar-34-killzowned/http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/13/6-video-game-titles-that-lied-straight-to-your-facehttp://www.ign.com/articles/2011/10/30/the-7-sins-of-bad-video-game-box-art and some product announcements: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/phoenix-games-to-publish-data-designs-new-racerhttp://www.eurogamer.net/articles/news291104monsterarenashttp://www.ign.com/articles/2003/12/02/fung-wan-online-beta-announcement. The quick synopsis of the previous links is that the company is known for shovelware and is briefly lambasted for it in listicles, and the name also shows in some press release-y product announcements for games that do not have enough coverage for even their own sections in a parent article. I wanted to check if anyone had additional sourcing before I take this to AfD. czar&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)