Deletion of Abdul Zahir (Guantanamo Bay detainee 753)

Comment: Clearly,  does not apply. First line, "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation." He's detained, has been detained and the likelihood (as by comment) of remaining detained has nothing to do with . Meets GNG, if these numerous sources don't meet GNG, nothing will, more exist that are not cited as well. Also, the 'low profile' or 'high profile' comments matter not, as if Wikipedia is a collection of the X most important topics, the only thing that truly matters is that we can properly account for information in the article without original research under GNG which states, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." Who cares about some 'notability guideline', the guide is used to state 'whom' or 'what' MAY be notable, with a criteria upon which notability is assumed. GNG is a policy and has a broad use and interpretation, all of which have been met by even the most high of expectations. Even if you argue over  its a one way road in this case, as the subject still is being written about 6 years later, and BP1E should not apply to an on-going matter of which is a hotly debated legal potato. 1E should be more on '1 day' or '1 week', because some individuals are notable for just that long through the media, but 6 years is quite different. Deletion serves to REDUCE information here, and without merit. Not every person is notable for being in a jail, but Gitmo is a weird case, largely condemned by one side, cautiously supported by another, yet the individuals themselves are denied rights and processes of their nations. Such individuals held in this 'extra-judical' case are easy to argue as notable, because of the circumstances of their imprisonment. If the individual meets GNG, then it is presumed notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The requirement for |significant coverage in |reliable sources has been met and Zahir is notable as being one of the few detainees to face the Guantanamo military commissions. Not a  as Zahir is not "likely to remain, a low-profile individual" considering he is still incarcerated (how many people remain at Guantanamo?) and we can assume that having been accused of a high-profile attack against a notable journalist he will likely be charged again in the next judicial system set up to try Guantanamo detainees
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: after searching for news and book mentions, did not find any reliable sources to warrant the subject would pass , or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: I think there are |enough significant citations and |quality sources to justify |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG)