Deletion of Myriam Chalek

Comment: I did not intend to imply that Chalek had anything to do with the placement of her name in the Fashion design article, only that her name ''did'' end up there, and hence, has spread across the internet.  I ''did'' intend to imply that the echoes of this Wikipedia article across the internet appear to form a large part of the available sourcing for this article.  This is not intended as a slur against Ms Malek; it only shows that the article is poorly sourced.  If better sourcing is available, I haven't been able to find it.  If Judith and IP:108... are such fervent fans, perhaps they are able to find better sourcing for the article.  As Judith says, not everything is "advertised through the media" (not that we want advertising anyway), but the media are the only way we at Wikipedia have of |verifying the information in the article, so if the media haven't taken note of Ms Malek's accomplishments, neither can we
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I wouldn't call my actions a vendetta, but, yes, I do have a desire that the Myriam Chalek page be deleted.  I would not have nominated it otherwise.  I support Wikipedia's goals of building a reliable encyclopedia and its policies of |notability and |verifiability that support that goal.  And I agree with IP:198... that the Moulay Yacoubi article is extremely poorly sourced and probably should be deleted.  I may take up that action myself.  But |the existence of other poor articles on Wikipedia is not a valid reason to keep this poor article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)