Deletion of Dalit History Month

Comment: the subject fails |notability criteria for events, and wp:gng|general notability criteria as well. It has been going on for 4-5 years, and it doesnt have sustained wp:sigcov|significant coverage. What I could find is press releases, and interviews. Both of these things can not be used establish notability. Also, "per all the delete votes above". —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)

Comment: passes  and .There is significant coverage  in  |reliable  sources , clearly independent leading Indian newspapers ,magazines ,newsites including Deccan Herald ,First Post ,Business Standard,LiveMint,The Indian Express ,The Hindu ,Huffington Post ,ThePrint  ,The Asian Age ,The Week (Indian magazine)|The Week ,Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook and Hindustan Times amongst others and also Academic journals like Television & New Media published by SAGE Publications and CrossCurrents this is without going through the Indian regional language media.Please note we are not comparing the sources of this article with Black History Month.Some newspapers are publishing a series of articles as part of Dalit history Month and there some other references in the article.As noted in the Washington Post ref below a news portal called The News Minute  became the first mainstream English media outlet in India to run a Dalit History Month series on caste discrimination, Dalit poetry and art and this being followed by some other newspapers as well of publishing a series of articles not just one single article under Dalit history Month
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LASTING||WP:RS)

Comment: Passes  e.g. https://www.deccanherald.com/content/669977/a-month-reminisce-dalit-contribution.html 1, https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/dalit-history-month-series-41033 2, https://scroll.in/article/720249/on-ambedkar-jayanti-dalit-history-month-rewrites-the-history-of-the-marginalised-community 3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:ILIKEIT|I like this and think it is awesome, but the sum of all the parts of this come across as slightly promotional and possibly the case that this is perhaps |a bit too new - which sort of feeds back into the promotional vibe I'm getting from this.  Yes, I am aware that this has its roots from 2013 as an observance.  I would rather see this return to Wikipedia after it has some solid footing on its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)