Deletion of Dinsmores, California

Comment: excluding the ghosttown.com cases. I haven't worked much with the former populated places, but when I have, the ones I have done sourced only to Durham have universally turned out to be a frustrating waste of time to attempt to verify. And even for real settlements, listing in a single ''omnium gatherum'' work just does not satisfy , and that's before the recent revelation that Durham's classification has been consistently misrepresented and that most of these are just place names that aren't even on a map. As far as the GNIS-and-Durham former settlements, I cannot offer my support on this group, having done vanishingly few of these, but I wouldn't oppose a TNT deletion of them as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think at this point we can simply call  on all of {{u|Carlossuarez46}}'s 2009 California articles which are referenced only to GNIS/Durham. The essence of a TNT situation is: {{tq|"if the article's content is useless (including all the versions in history) but the title might be useful, then delete the content to help encourage a new article. If you keep the article, then you're keeping something of no value until someone replaces it with something of value, when people tend to be more inclined to fill red links"}}. This is clearly that kind of situation - these articles exist, which dissuades anyone from creating them in better form, but they are also garbage, with probably ''at most'' 1-in-20 being a  pass and then only with detailed research for each one of those 20. GNIS is a bad source, and Durham may be a good source but it has not been cited correctly whenever it has been checked (i.e., the locales it is being referenced for aren't communities that were ever inhabited). Much better for the project to delete all and then recreate the ones that can be recreated. {{u|Reywas92}}, {{u|Cxbrx}},{{u|Hog Farm}}, {{u|Mangoe}} (users pinged as they have all recently contributed in AFDs involving California locales only sourced to GNIS/Durham) - I would support simply adding all of these California location articles that are cited only to GNIS/Durham and TNTing them in one go rather than separately PROD/AFD for each one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:GEOLAND)