Deletion of Deb Lawrence

Comment: If after extensive cleanup almost nothing remains to indicate why the subject is important or significant, it's safe to say that the notability criteria have not been met. Even in the deleted bits, I have found nothing that would support a claim to notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: per {{u|widefox}}, and thanks for grabbing this- I saw it earlier and intended to bring it here but got distracted. A  brings up an absolute paucity of sources (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Deb+Lawrence%22&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj46ZaWhejTAhXFCMAKHT6MDqcQ_AUICigB#tbm=nws&q=%22Deb+Lawrence%22+artist ), most of them unreliable (blogs and zines, for example). The only other sources are either local news outlets giving passing mentions with no |depth or |persistence of coverage, or |primary sources  lacking |independence from the subject. Fails  per nom. Fails  by the dearth of reliable sourcing and coverage. And this is eithout even getting into the  /  /  aspects of the article's creation. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:PRIMARY||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:NARTIST||WP:ANYBIO||WP:PROMO||WP:UPE||WP:COI)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)