Deletion of Thigh gap

Comment: notable topic. While the article unsuitable for DYK, this subject has been the subject of significant coverage from major newspapers for at least several months. Furthermore, these sources discuss the topic instead of just using the term, so WP:NEO doesn't apply and WP:NPOV |isn't a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: as meeting . There is widespread coverage in reliable sources that address the subject directly and in detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: For a similar article about an earlier fashion, see wasp waist.  This fashion is fairly new but seems too notable to dismiss completely.  There seem to be |alternatives to deletion such as merger into a more general article such as feminine beauty ideal which we should prefer per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)