Deletion of Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh

Comment: Reverse epidimiology" is mentioned in some 1800 papers in Google scholar, and is the primary subject of approximately 60 (that is, the phrase appears in the title of these papers). Kalantar-Zadeh's papers are the top three in citations among the 1800. That, even more than the impressive citation/h-index counts taken out of context, convinces me that he is the world's top expert in a subject of some significance and therefore that he passes #C1. He is also a fellow of four medical societies; I'm not familiar enough with their fellowship requirements to say for sure but it seems likely that he passes #C3 on the basis of some or all of these
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: The http://in-cites.com/scientists/KamyarKalantar-Zadeh.html in-cites interview and his Google Scholar citation counts (9 articles with over 200 citations published since 2001) seem sufficient to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: per Qwfp. CSD#A7 was indeed inappropriate: the article makes (very large) claims of notability. So much so, in fact, that CSD#G11 could have been more appropriate... The article needs complete re-writing. Parts of it are wrongly interpreted from the in-cites interview (a "medical diploma" in Germany is ''not'' an MD) and the whole thing is written in an inappropriate, unencyclopedic, breathless and overblown way. But the interview, the fact that he published one of the most cited articles in his field, and the other citation data demonstrate clear impact on his field, so this passes #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)