Deletion of Wiki fraud

Comment: Wiki-fraud" or "Wiki fraud" (the article uses these terms interchangably) is a non-notable neologism, made up by the author of the article as far as I can see. The article also (regardless of what the authour says) breaches  by not citing sources. Also appears not to be written from a NPOV (i.e. suggesting 99% of articles subject to wiki-fraud, reference to people referring to Wikipedia as "slack-jawed yokels
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)

Comment: as a neologism. Where does it say that "email" is a neologism? Catchphrases passed through chain emails may be neologisms, but email itself is not. Your argument on "wherever possible" is missing something: If it is not possible, that probably means the article shouldn't exist. http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22wiki+fraud Google can serve as the "source" you seek: there are no results there that pertain to the subject of this article. I don't care whether there is another article criticizing Wikipedia; it's just that this one isn't it. Feel free work on Criticism of Wikipedia, , Wikipedia:Problems with Wikipedia, Daniel Brandt, and all those other articles on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:FAIL)

Comment: not because I want to say that there is nothing relevant in that article. All those cases should be addressed. But WE DON'T HAVE ARTICLES WITHOUT SOURCES. If the editor wants to know the pertinent rules he might want to look at , , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:ATT)