Deletion of Riley Reid (2nd nomination)

Comment: Clearly passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Notable Adult Actress. Passes..  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/72.192.209.229|72.192.209.229
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: tons of mainstream media coverage on her. I found these https://www.papermag.com/riley-reid-pornhub-star1-2540855607.html, https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/how-one-porn-star-deals-with-internet-hate-just-the-tips/5c81744dbe4077591d212894, https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-porn-is-getting-in-on-the-documentary-craze-i-want-to-show-them-my-raw-self, https://www.news.com.au/sport/sports-life/pornstar-riley-reid-weighs-in-on-youtube-star-jake-pauls-boxing-match-up/news-story/9c87bce321861d9e6ac3938d296c05d2 in a |few seconds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: She easily passes . I ran a mainstream news archive search for her and found a whole bunch of material in a bunch of contexts from multiple countries - a surprising amount considering the dearth of material I've come to expect on some of these AfDs. I think this is the most clear-cut pass I've come across in these AfDs yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Blatantly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm a little surprised at the nomination and the single "Delete" vote thus far, to be honest. The subject clearly passes —lots of sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)