Deletion of Un-Chosen Marriage

Comment: The author is not notable either.  The standard for notability for an author per  is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Her age should not be the deciding factor here.  Going by the guidelines at  I just dont' see how this passes.  The book is not even written yet, much less published. P.S. please sign your remarks using four tildes.  That will sign and date it for you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: The quote from Jimbo above is the opinion of one wikipedian even if he is the founder.  Wikipedia:Notability also has a link to some guidelines for notability for books at .  It gives a good list of 10 notability criteria.  This book doesn't come close to meeting any of them.  The book is not published yet.  Hence it is NOT verifiable.  And, just because something is verifiable and can be presented in a NPOV fashion does NOT mean it is encyclopedic.  For example, I have a dandelion in my yard.  This can be verified, it can also be presented in an NPOV fashion.  But encyclopedic?  Of course not.  Notability is the key.  The dandelion is not. And, nor is the book per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:BK)