Deletion of Krausser–Samwer–Zaccone equation

Comment: fails . I agree with {{u|Chalst}}; considering the citations, contents of the research and subsequent academic coverage may be included on relevant articles within the limits of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: or '''draftify''' - while potentially important, and fascinating to this science teacher, this is still |original research, and it would need to be cited in a textbook or professional development seminar, before we would publish it here. Sorry, but |it's still too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per the nomination and {{u|Mark viking}}. I looked into this page shortly after it was created and decided that it was pushing a |neologism for a topic that didn't have enough coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. At the time, I didn't have the energy to start an AfD (and the matter did not seem very pressing), but now that somebody else has, I'll chime in with my opinion. Age is a red herring; what matters is coverage in |secondary and tertiary sources establishing that the topic is significant and that the scientific community has given it a standardized name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: This equation has no coverage in GScholar or GBooks under this name, so the title is a neologism. Whatever it is called, there are no independent secondary sources discussing this model/equation in depth, so there are no reliable sources in the Wikipedia sense  and the topic fails notability criteria per . Because the title has no support in the literature, even a redirect to the viscosity section is unwarranted. Hence, delete. When the equation gets in depth discussions in multiple secondary sources like published review articles or books, written by authors independent of the creators, then an article could be considered. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia is not the name for , even for naming things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)