Deletion of Dave Eggar

Comment: for now): Evidence the subject passes  #1, possibly #4, #5, #6, possibly #7, certainly #8, and possibly #10. I would like to find more independent and non-promotional sources but we should not determine against stand alone status when search results may be biased. I was "almost" persuaded by {{u|Atlantic306}} to !vote delete, because a "week keep" on rumors is not compelling, but three Grammy's are. The current poor shape of the article is not a determining factor but a |promotional tone is evident. This is not detrimental as it can be resolved by editing. '''See comments below
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC||WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: per  and . It sounds like a contradiction, but he barely scrapes by with significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: the article claims one of his pieces won a grammy award. If that can be confirmed that woukd be a pass of one of the criteria of  (only one criteria needed), imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)