Deletion of Zadara Storage (2nd nomination)

Comment: the sources meet the requirements of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: non-notable company with Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Examples_of_trivial_coverage|trivial coverage. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: u|Timtempleton}}, {{u|PrinceTortoise}}, {{u|Devokewater}} I see your !votes all say that the topic meets GNG. The appropriate SNG is  which has stricter interpretations on requirements especially with regard to references/sources used to establish notability. Can you confirm you believe the sources meet NCORP and if so, can you point to which references you believe meet NCORP
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: I just cleaned up and updated the article with some recent news. There's other coverage about a 2018 funding round https://www.ocbj.com/news/2018/sep/10/zadara-wows-microsoft-vet-tune-25-million/ but I don't think the article needs it - what's there now meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)