Deletion of World Security Forum

Comment: The sources within the article link to websites that I would not consider |reliable, a quick google news search on "World Security Forum" turns up no relevant results (you would think, google news being a sort of compendium of baseline and better reliable sources would turn up something), the event seems suspicious at best, with next to none outside middle-east coverage. Because of these factors I think the article fails |general notability guidelines. — '''^.^''' &#91
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: First of all, you already made a keep !vote earlier in the AfD.  Second of all, I think you should read  which states that wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and just because there might be good sources for this article later, does not mean that it should be created now.  I'm sure once the convention is underway and it gets significant press coverage, then it can be recreated, but as of now it is not appropriate for wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)