Deletion of Philip Markoff(2nd nomination)

Comment: The nominator accuses all editors who want to keep this article of being prejudiced and tries to impose swingeing COI rules on this discussion. I would argue that this nomination totally fails to assume good faith in other editors and is thus invalid. Additionally, the circumstances of this case are certainly unusual, and Markoff meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and redirect per Backslash Forwardslash. 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: He is charged with more than one crime, as is documented in the articleand has had substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources.  does not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Is this a joke?  BLP1E allows if massive attention for a single event.  But this article is not about a single event, but a string of events.  And I'm having a hard time deciphering what the nominator is even talking about but it sounds like someone is trying to use this AFD to make a  about some unrelated issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)