Deletion of Odero Peter Otieno

Comment: Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable for the purposes of guaranteeing him an article, so the notability standard he would have to meet is that he's been the subject of enough |reliable source coverage to clear  — but the references here are |primary sources, not reliable or notability-supporting media coverage. Wikipedia is not a free publicity platform on which people are entitled to place their résumés in order to boost their web presence ''because'' they lack conventional media coverage — the depth of ''media'' coverage a person does or doesn't have ''is'' the notability test that ''determines'' whether they get a Wikipedia article or not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: No evidence of notability found in a search, some of the sources given don't even mention him, what sources there are are just trivial mentions. Fails . Also strong likelihood of self-promotion. Delete the redirects as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While this person has gained ''some'' attention (http://ceedconcordia.org/en/news-and-events/upcoming/ this speaks to that) there isn't sufficient reliable, secondary sources attesting to his notability to meet  or . I am troubled as well about the creator's  attitude in having his draft rejected (see Draft:Odero Otieno), and then subsequently creating the article in mainspace anyway, with essentially the same material. Further, the editor appears likely to be the subject of the article, based on usernames.  comes into play here. I've placed uw-autobiography warnings on the talk pages of the two accounts in question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBIO||WP:IDHT||WP:AUTOBIO)