Deletion of Grietje Jansen-Anker (2nd nomination)

Comment: to the list of European oldsters. '''Wholeheartedly Endorse''' the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: as per  and . I don't even think this is notable, given that all "coverage" is of the "she lived ... oh wait, she died" variety, but let's set the GNG issues aside for a moment. There's simply nothing interesting or out of the ordinary to write about the subject. Her page can be easily summed up as a DOB, DOD, and a bullet point describing the brief time she was the oldest person in an arbitrary small fraction of the planet. This is classic material for a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: Even if she passed the tests of  and OPAGE, the subject clearly expressed a desire not to attract this sort of attention. While I am usually wary of deleting an article based on the subject's wishes (especially implicit ones rather than explicit ones), in cases of borderline notability such as this, it only serves as an additional justification to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOPAGE)