Deletion of Pakistan Murdabad

Comment: The page is no where an attack page, its just showcases a very very popular quote. The article is not attacking the country of Pakistan as an whole. Well, yeah, remember that Wikipedia is |uncensored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CENSOR)

Comment: As the nomination says, this is pure  and . If this slogan is acceptable for Wikipedia, then there are literally hundreds of other such ''Anti-national'' sentiments that should be here as well. These pages would serve no other purpose then to spread hate speech and provoke conflict which is evident by the votes here instead. Most in support of the article are Indians and most who want it deleted are from Pakistan. Also, this page shows clear signs of |Original Research as the ''facts'' presented can easily be disputed and provides no real value to the readers. &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACK||WP:BATTLEGROUND||WP:NOR)

Comment: Another example of bad faith nomination. Please see . Notability has been proven, and the article has been written in a neutral manner, with only those facts which have been verified by s. When Pakistan Zindabad (Long Live Pakistan) can have a place on Wikipedia, then why not Pakistan Murdabad, and that too when both have almost equal coverage. This also seems a case of , as the article was an orphan at the time of speedy deletion nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:RS||WP:HOUNDING)

Comment: per . I don't know how it came to AfD, it should have been speedy deleted per CSD#G10
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACK)

Comment: Wikipedia is not censored. fD is not the place to resolve edit disputes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: I don't see any attack. Meets , well sourced and totally makes sense. --&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The AfD is unusually attracting keep !votes from users who are mostly related to WikiProject India, even though this article is not listed there. I am going to place {{tl|Not a ballot}} at the top to remind editors that this is not a majority vote discussion and keeping in mind  and  sensitivities. India's (percieved) hatred of Pakistan alone is not an adequate enough reason to keep this  article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOTVOTE||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Simply an |attack page. Wikipedia is a not about personal POV. If this kind of page is created stating
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATP)

Comment: trivial . The existence of the slogan as such is presumably a trivial fact of the Hindi language – just as in English you can trivially create a "down with X" slogan about anything you hate, and a "long live Y" slogan about anything you support. The fact that people use such slogans about various issues and at various occasions doesn't render these stereotyped slogans themselves notable, separately from the notability of the political issue each of them represents. The article consists solely of an enumeration of separate and unconnected cases where people are reported to have used this slogan, without – as far as I can see – any source discussing the slogan as a cultural or political phenomenon in its own right. As such, the article is a paradigm case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Article is just a list of occurrences of people using a fairly common phrase and thus borders on being . Any content from this page that is worth keeping can be merged in with Anti-Pakistan sentiment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)