Deletion of Hunter Biden laptop controversy

Comment: to Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory#Laptop and hard drive. Per . The contents of Hunter Biden laptop controversy duplicates the contents of Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory, but with a more right-leaning POV and  problems, giving too much weight to an opinion columnist. I disagree with deletion, I think this should be a redirect, I find the search term plausible. I disagree with merging, the material is already covered at Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory, and is covered with the correct NPOV/WEIGHT
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: POVFORK of Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory. I don't think there's much here worth merging, it's already covered using more reliable sources at Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory#Laptop and hard drive. This previously contained BLP violating content, which I removed per ; the remaining article body is centred on an opinion piece discussing these allegations, which come from two disreputable low-quality tabloids, as Muboshgu points out above. The coverage in some of these tabloid attack pieces is getting pretty nasty, they should be treated with extreme caution per BLP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:GRAPEVINE)

Comment: to Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory#Laptop and hard drive, per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per . The article overlaps with material already presented elsewhere. See discussion at Talk:Hunter Biden laptop controversy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS and  issues with weak sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: to Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory per . Creator is {{tq|new to American Politics on Wikipedia}} ... and should learn from this
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: The content in this article is DUE in the same exact proportion as content on the Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory article. It just uses more controversial sourcing (Newsweek, NY Post, etc), and has a title that appears to make this conspiracy theory more plausible than is warranted. I would even go so far as to say this article is a |POVFORK of Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory. I don't believe it has notability independent of that theory, and it is never mentioned outside of that theory in our RSes. Ergo, '''should be redirected to that article, and any non-redundant DUE NPOV content that is of high quality should be merged into a new section of Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)