Deletion of Dane Lovett

Comment: Just to clarify, what does everyone think the claim to fame is here? He doesn't seem to meet any of the standards for creative professionals at . I can't really find any non-trivial coverage of him or his work, or even a significant number of write-ups from critics, so I'm kind of at a loss to explain where the notability comes from. Is just being nominated for an ARIA enough to have an article? Seems like an interesting precedent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Being ARIA nominated does it for me. However it needs to comply with  and have everything strictly referenced, or removed (is noise.net a |reliable source?). I can't see why he doesn't want the article which is in no way a negative portrayal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:RS)

Comment: Borderline notable as per . There are some references indicating that he is a rising Queensland artist. http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?hl=en&ned=&q=%22Dane+Lovett%22&ie=UTF-8. Album did not win an ARIA which were held last October http://www.ariaawards.com.au/winners-nominees-2006.php  but Black Fingernails, Red Wine was the seventh best selling album in Australia last year. http://www.aria.com.au/2006AustralianWholesaleRecordSales.htm
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)