Deletion of Betül Kahraman

Comment: She plays for Ankara University SK, which competes in the Turkish Women's Ice Hockey League - a semi-professional league which is the highest level of women's ice hockey in Turkey. Passes  point 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)

Comment: Another example of a player who meets none of the criteria at  or  and whose claims to meeting  are based solely on routine sports reporting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:NSPORTS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  No indication of wide |GNG. Article is well referenced (ignoring the fact that 11 of those sources are present simply to confirm two statements - complete overkill), however all sources are essentially databases, stat sites or |brief routine mentions. Furthermore, I'm seeing significant elements of the information in the article being garnered from |primary sources. Would challenge other editors to provide a single instance of a significant, dedicated article on the player that might be used to support GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: Fails , and I can't find anything that would give a male player a GNG pass, so it probably is a fail for a female player as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)

Comment: Passes  per the excellent work by LauraHale. At that point,  is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NHOCKEY)

Comment: Passing NHOCKEY is not relevant here.  She passes , which supersedes, this based on the Turkish media coverage. This includes a number of mentions in the regional publication Çağdaş Kocaeli, along with additional mentions in the national press :tr:Sportstv|sportstv, :tr:Doğan Haber Ajansı|Doğan Haber Ajansı and Fanatik and national online newspaper Haberler
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Despite the claims that there are numerous sources for this player, {{u|LauraHale}} correctly states they are "mentions". Mentions are not '''significant coverage''' per GNG, specifically: ''"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.'' The http://www.star.com.tr/pazar/hizli-sert-heyecanli-buz-hokeyi-tam-bizlik-haber-1082878/ first source listed is likely the best as she was interviewed about why she plays hockey, although the article is not specifically about her as she is one of several interviewed. 2 and 3 are stats pages. 4 is a photo where she is mentioned in the caption. 5 (and 6 as a reprint of the same article) are  coverage of a game where she is listed as a team member. 7 is more routine game coverage where she is only mentioned because it was her 17th birthday. 8 and 9 is more routine game coverage where she scored a point. 10 is about the team, she is mentioned in passing. 11, 12 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 are all ended with lists of the members of the team, of which she was one. 23 lists her as a trainer. Which one of these articles merits GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)