Deletion of Julin Jean

Comment: per DGG.  My boyfriend the producer went to the 63rd Cannes Film Festival and all I got was a cute blue watch.  His boyfriend is a sysop at Wikiepdia and he does ''not'' get an article.  Not every film screened at Cannes is notable.   That is why we have 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: not notable.  Refs are questionable as to reliability.  #1 is passing mention on a blog; #2 is a Facebook page; #3 is a in-depth promotional interview on a website; #4 is a Vimeo page; #5 is a promotional interview on a different website; #6-8 are blogs; #9 is Amazon.com site for one of her CDs; and #10 is the same as #5.  Since blogs, video hosting sites, social networking sites, and on-line stores are not suitable references, you are left with 2 promotional interviews on websites.  Doesn't come close to meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: Having just read  earlier today, I am going to agree with Eatmocake in regard to the "subjectivity" issue. The article in the the Houston Chronicle is adequately in-depth, and establishes notability, IMO. The subject may not strike everyone in here as an artist to be taken seriously, but I have to come down on the side of notability having been established, per the various references cited by GregJackP. I am in disagreement with Peridon vis-a-vis the characterization of the ''Houston Chronicle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)