Deletion of Abella Anderson (4th nomination)

Comment: Passes #1 with NightMoves Best New Starlet (Fan's Choice) award, which is well-known/significant and not scene-related/ensemble. In 2002, the ''St. Petersburg Times'' noted that the NightMoves Awards were http://www.sptimes.com/2002/09/17/TampaBay/Flesh_glints_at_film_.shtml "the third largest in the porn industry". Other porn industry award ceremonies held in 2002 include AVN Award|AVN, XRCO Award|XRCO, Venus Award|Venus, and Barcelona International Erotic Film Festival|NINFA, which are all considered well-known/significant industry awards by consensus, satisfying PORNBIO (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gracie_Glam, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kurt_Lockwood, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brandon_Iron, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maya_Gold, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tanya_Hansen_(2nd_nomination) & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rebeca_Linares). If at least two out of the four awards I've listed are smaller than NightMoves and still considered well-known/significant enough to meet PORNBIO, than NightMoves also satisfies PORNBIO. NightMoves is also http://www.xbiz.com/news/178049 the porn industry's third longest running awards show. Best New Starlet is a newcomer award, and those have Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2012#Newcomer_awards_should_be_excluded|overwhelming consensus favoring their inclusion in PORNBIO. Most participants at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keri Sable, a recipient of the exact same award, voted to keep the article. Three of the keep votes regarded her NightMoves win as a reason (one by me, the others "per Rebecca1990"). Anderson also passes PORNBIO#3, "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media", for her roles in the film Clapping for the Wrong Reasons and the music video 3005 (song), appearances which have generated a lot of mainstream media coverage for her. The fact that all three of her award wins were fan voted is also evidence that she passes #2 ("Has a large fan base
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: THis one isn't even close.  Multiple major industry awards automatically passes her under  #1. I notice the same anti-porn voters trying to eliminate a lot of porn actress pages; this must violate some kind of guideline. But that's off-topic.  On topic: Anderson qualifies under Wikipedia guidelines as notable. Easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Fails , ,  No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. No noteworthy creative or artistic contribution to the film industry. She is of no historical significance. Not really an actress or actor in films or theater and no way to determine if she has a "cult" following because this is not noted in reliable sources - fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:ARTIST||WP:MODEL||WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: rebecca1990 clearly show that  and I see no argument by the opposers that the article fails pornbio
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)