Deletion of Business Motivation Model

Comment: very strongly.  The first impression is that we are dealing with a sort of language pathology.  This purports to be a "metamodel" that purportedly "enables stakeholders in an enterprise":''To define the components of governance – what the enterprise wants to be (its ends), what it has decided to do to get there (its means), and how it will govern the means it has adopted.To record decisions made in response to changes in internal and external influencers, to change ends and means, and to reference which parts of the operational business are affected.To take account of earlier decisions made in response to the same and other related influencers.''Translating this septic prose into English, this "metamodel" makes it possible to figure out what you're doing, remember what you did, and figure out what you're going to do next.  And you paid how much for that?  This is classic |complete bollocks, belabouring the obvious in polysyllables.  As Truman Capote said, "that isn't writing - it's typing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: Fails to assert the notability of the subject through ''independent'' |reliable sources. The only sources cited are either the original paper or the standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)