Deletion of Porn for the Blind (3rd nomination)

Comment: There is nothing out there that shows 100% that this is either real or fake. It looks like enough people had taken the site seriously when it was initially announced to where even if it is a joke website, some uploaded clips without the intention of actually providing audio narration for blind people while others clearly meant for the clips to be used for that purpose. However here's the big issue: despite claims that the website was launched back in 2006/2007, the site really only gained notice in 2008 when it was first announced to exist. Other than one or two brief articles that came out a short period of time later (as in 1 paragraph type articles), the website has attracted no further attention. I also notice that its Alexa rank is rather low for any type of website, but especially a pornography website, although I know that this isn't in itself a reason to delete. Why I mention that is because it looks like the site got a brief spate of articles in 2008 that announced it exists and was then largely ignored by the world in general. There is http://www.vice.com/read/porn-for-the-blind this Vice article (unsure if this is just a random contributor or a staff writer, though) and http://bazonline.ch/kultur/diverses/Porno-fuer-Blinde/story/10578699 this German website, but neither really seem to suggest that they're the type of long term coverage that would show that this website passes . If there were a little more than this could potentially pass, but right now there just isn't enough for me to really think it passes notability guidelines. It's close, but not close enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)