Deletion of Port Place Shopping Centre

Comment: nbsp; Arguments for deletion are based on eletion policy, and are not free to ignore the  alternatives to deletion, as we are here to build and  an encyclopedia, not run off our content contributors.&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: nbsp; Given the relatively small size of the centre, merge was a consideration, such as I recommended for a similarly-sized mall at rticles for deletion/Vasundhara Metro Mall.&nbsp; I also considered a move to something like Cityscape of Nanaimo, or List of shopping centres in Nanaimo.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: nbsp; WP:GNG does not require non-local sources; and , which is not a criteria typically applied to mall AfDs, only requires one "regional, national, or international source".&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)

Comment: mdash; for one,  isn't a policy or guideline, so it's not an accurate reflection of broad consensus to apply to AFD anyway. However, |the general notability guideline (GNG)&mdash;a guideline that is a reflection of consensus&mdash;does, at the very least, require significant (in-depth) coverage of the topic. GNG is admittedly subjective to a degree, but as RoySmith points out, the mentions in the sources given either aren't substantial (i.e., coverage is merely incidental to some other subject) or fail other portions of GNG's source requirements / #DIR|merely prove existence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: or '''Redirect to List of shopping malls in Canada'''.  Fails  due to lack of significant coverage.  Examining the references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)