Deletion of David Bowles (author)

Comment: All the other issues aside the bar for this article is  and given all the effort to keep the article, there is no indication that that bar of  is met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: There is an increasing number of |single purpose accounts being created for the sole purpose of voting in favor of keeping this article. The above user created their account at 22:50 and within 19 minutes had assembled a detailed bibliography for a random academic they do not know. The fact that nobody besides recently-created, SPA are voting "keep" is significant. (In interest of disclosure, I have deleted a previous comment that I felt was too sarcastic and did not further the discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: it's difficult to AGF when the proponents for deletion discount a significant body of widely-cited and award-winning literature, backed up with third party reported social activism, as not meeting . It is met. On another channel it would be difficult to refrain from calling this proposal malicious and absurd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)