Deletion of Tony Muilenburg

Comment: Does not meet . Appears to have no publications (nothing shows on G-scholar), nor does he seem to have furthered an area of research. Being a senior engineer at Intel isn't one of the criteria - it's a job title that probably many hold
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: No evidence of passing  (in particular, no significant citations found on Google scholar, for work in a high-citation subject) and the article's sources do not provide evidence for passing . Only references 6-8 (Oregonian, Nanoelectronics, and Rhizome) look both reliable and sufficiently independent of the subject, and none of those provides the in-depth coverage requested by GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: It appears the article's creator is the subject or closely related. Another editor pointed out the  on the creator's talk page. While his main career is as a senior engineer at Intel, I don't believe that's enough to satisfy criteria #7 of , as there's nothing to suggest his position at Intel carries any notability. I can't find anything that comes close to satisfying any of the other criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:PROF)