Deletion of Adventure (motorcycle)

Comment: I agree the current article is |original research (I tagged it as such before it was nominated for deletion); it is also |unreferenced. However, I think the subject matter is WPN|notable. A quick Google search threw up a number of |reliable sources referring to adventure motorcycles: http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/newsresults/First-rides-tests/2010/june/jun1010-top-ten-adventure-bikes/, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/motorbikes/8950917/Kawasaki-Versys-1000-review.html, http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/Leicestershire-firm-Triumph-Motorcycles-reports/story-14019224-detail/story.html, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WM8DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA56&dq=%22adventure+bike%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=M3rqTpTfGdP24QShreGlCQ&ved=0CHMQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=%22adventure%20bike%22&f=false and so on. Its clear that "adventure bike"/"adventure motorcycle" is an accepted term in the wider world, and as such is a valid subject for a Wikipedia article. All that said, the current version of the article needs swift and substantial improvement so it is written based on proper sources, not on what one editor believes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: While the article might currently be , a cursory search in google shows that the term exists, is used by manufacturers, and looks like a notable class of motorcycle. While more research should be done for the article, it seems like the article could be cleaned up to pass our deletion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)