Deletion of Dimetri Hogan (2nd nomination)

Comment: Even though some of them are PR, I think at least 3-4 references which are good to consider and pass . However, I would like to see some refs to his achievements before voting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'd say in terms of  this is borderline; some of the sources cited are clearly promo fluff, but a few seem just about okay, and put together might add up to general notability. However, I've seen nothing that comes close to  notability (on which point, the list of alleged awards is unreferenced), and to me, that tilts this towards delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: subject does not meet  due to a lack of in-depth, independent coverage in reliable sources. The quality of the sources covering the topic (both on Wiki and off) are generally poor; they are either found in borderline reliable sources, are laced with  information (thus failing the independent requirement), or lack in-depth coverage. For example, The best source currently cited (from ''The Source'') seems to be a press release for Hogan taking a job at an advertising firm, the ''Vegas'' https://vegasmagazine.com/dimetri-hogan-its-more-than-food article was written by a publicist (not magazine staff), and the ''Maxim'' article was (per the article page) presented by T1 Advertising - the same firm which recently https://thesource.com/2020/01/23/dimetri-hogan-brings-a-tasteful-spotlight-to-modern-fashion-and-art-awarded-new-cco-position-at-t1-advertising/ appointed Hogan as CCO. Once you cut through all the native advertising and placed PR, none of the sources cited (or that could be cited via a  check) credibly indicate the subject meets the criteria laid down by , and the repeated issues with  information makes me discount GNG as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BEFORE)