Deletion of Alyssa Carson (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not a slam-dunk but there is now just too much non-trivial RS here (per the article) do be a delete.  The July 2019 ''https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurabegleybloom/2019/07/13/meet-the-worlds-youngest-astronaut-in-training-designer-of-the-first-ever-space-luggage/#3b0d86521cfe Forbes'' piece (albeit a senior contributor) is pretty much SIGCOV.   says: {{tq|If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability}}.  She meets this criteria now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Over two years of sustained coverage (a lot more if you count the handful of articles out there about Carson from 2014), so not  as was argued by some in 2018. Plenty of sources to easily meet . One of the issues from the last nomination was that Carson "hadn't done anything" but she has since self-published a book and developed some space luggage, so there's that. Another problem from previous AfD was Carson being under 18 but time has solved that one for us. Can't see a reason to delete other than people just not wanting the article to exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: meets , covered by |independent sources over |extended period of time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:RS||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: per  as explained by others above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: as the references definitely meet . However, please ping me when the notability guidelines are overturned or if  starts excluding articles about young women and I shall reconsider
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: per . It doesn't matter if she's achieved nothing at all: reliable sources have taken note of her, thus she's notable. (Had she flown to Mars but not received national news coverage, I might lean the other way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: During the course of this AfD the BLP has been edited to remove trivia and now properly includes the corrections issued by NASA and Newsweek about the subject's allegedly illegitimate use of the NASA logo and connections. I think the present version is more balanced, but it now reads as an ttack page|attack page. In some jurisdictions of the world the use of deception to gain a benefit is regarded as a criminal offense and it seems that the BLP can implicitly be construed of accusing the subject of doing this. It could be that some of the Keep votes did not appreciate that the current version of the BLP could result in public exposure of the subject's behavior. I see this situation as a case of a vulnerable young person being exploited by older people and not fully understanding the consequences of their actions. I think that the article should be deleted under BLP policy and o no harm
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:D)