Deletion of Pink House (Melbourne Beach, Florida)

Comment: I believe 7 of the 10 are NRHP listed and therefore notable. The remainder should be individually renominated after a thorough  if they still appear not to meet GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Subjects isn't aren't notable. Although https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail?assetID=9f50a2f0-a195-4e26-a21a-cf8942050129 Moses J. Taylor House, https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail?assetID=ddae68e9-4d4c-4faf-88ae-1f9d927fa3f6 Bishop-Andrews Hotel, and https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail?assetID=6ba02714-eca0-446a-b0ad-8356faf40d8e Fairbanks Houseare all registered historic buildings,  requires {{tq|"significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability"}} which seem to be lacking. Admittedly, the paid editors are busy at work and they've been staying a step ahead of us. If the consensus is delete, I'd ask the closing admin to put Fairbanks House (Fernandina Beach, Florida) into my userspace so I can rehab it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: Fails ; I don't find anything about the house on newspapers.com, google books, etc, although in theory such an article could be useful, per https://xkcd.com/810/ XKCD:Constructive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: It seems to have enough sourced detail to pass the . Some of the sources are not properly formatted and do not include sufficient bibliographic detail to easily verify, but I think hter is enogh here to keep and improve. Failing that, draftify while refs are checked and filled in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Any of the properties on the NRHP are notable; the standards for listing a property on the NRHP are higher than Wikipedia's standards of notability, and part of the nomination process involves compiling a list of references that can be used to support our articles as well. Besides, most of those articles aren't even promotional, they're just short; of course, being promotional isn't inherently a reason to delete something, since AfD isn't cleanup. No opinion on the others, though the lack of  for the properties on the NRHP has me leaning toward a procedural keep for those as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)