Deletion of Douglas v. City of Jeannette

Comment: Only one reference is given but it is a reference to the actual Supreme Court decision.  That ought to be plenty.  This is an incomplete article but that argues for completing the article, not for deleting it.  All U.S. Supreme Court cases are inherently notable.  If the Supremes chose to accept a case, it means that it had sufficient merit to warrant their consideration.  (They decline to hear many, many cases each year.)  The only part of the article that has been "written" so far is the "Facts of the Case" section and, although it may seem like a "rambling personal essay", it is actually a verbatim copy from the actual http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=319&page=157 decision of the Supreme Court.  Because the decision is effectively a publication of the U.S. government, the text should be in the public domain and so no copyright violation should exist.  I do admit that the verbatim copying of the text from the decision does not yield the ideal prose for an encyclopedia article.  However, that is an argument for rewriting the text, not for deleting the article.  (NB: I'm an admin but I won't speedy close this AFD because I'm the creator of the article and closing the AFD could be construed as a |conflict of interest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)