Deletion of Jean-Jacques Razafindranazy

Comment: First off, the nomination is not even wrong - |no effort has been made to add the sources in the French article. There are TV and newspaper articles that can be used as sources. Secondly, the nomination seems to reek of  and unconscious bias (Wikipedia has been rightly accused of inherent bias); deleting this article will cause us great harm and unnecessary controversy (we've kept a Chinese doctor's article who is only famous for fighting Corona virus, but not an African doctor who did the same thing?). Finally |the nomination outright ignores the excellent sourcing; nowhere does English Wikipedia require sources only to be in English. NOTMEMORIAL does not override . ''Premiere'' can mean "first" or "best known" in French, and it's used in both senses in the French sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: I believe both   and  applies to this case, I prefer this to be deleted but would wait for response by Bearian. I cannot find anything extraordinary done by this doctor that millions of other health care workers have not done. The death was sad and unfortunate, but it remains to be seen if it was impactful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I suspect that there may be quite a few similar pages created for individuals who have died in this way (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg Broadbent|Peg Broadband below), and this may warrant a Tea House discussion. For the moment, we should be led by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)