Deletion of List of men famous for being well endowed

Comment: According to , #Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors|Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors so your arguments about censorship are baseless. Actually, if this content was added in the articles, it would be deleted as unverifiable rumormongering. You can add this content to the main articles and if you find that it is deleted you will have conclusive proof that the Wikipedia community feels the same.--May the Force be with you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: User contributions may not necessarily affect judgement (even though their lack of experience may be unsettling) but the fact remains that all valid votes are counted, irrespective of number of contributuions. ALso, this list is POV because who gets to decide which of these men are famous for large endowments. For example, Milton Berle was famous and he may have had a large endowment, but he was not necessarily famous for it. Same is the case for Tommy Lee. Also, there aren't any sources or pics proving these claims. Most of the links are to blog sites holding discussions about these claims and nowhere is even one source stated. Rumormongering is |not a part of what Wikipedia is about--May the Force be with you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I feel a little uncomfortable that many user who have voted keep have very few contribs (less than 10). Also, shouldn't this AFD be closed by now. The given lag time of an AFD in  is 5 days and it's been more than a week now.--May the Force be with you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: listcruft and not .  The only person on the list who is  as far as I know is Lee, and that is a case of the myth being larger than life (no pun intended)... besides, the list is incomplete without an "Isotope23" entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)