Deletion of List of James Bond allies in Die Another Day

Comment: Merging might bloat the parent article - although I suppose it could be trimmed. However, per , this article is satisfactory. It would just need to be referenced and written from a neutral point of view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: obviously a sub-article of ''Die Another Day'' and perfectly consistent with the other articles in :Category:Lists of James Bond allies.  doesn't even belong in , "trivia" is not against policy. And correct me if I'm wrong, but ''Die Another Day'' has been reviewed by over 180 film criticshttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/die_another_day/. Those are reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject and can be used to expand the article. And |"notability" is actually '''not a requirement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: if |notability isn't a requirement then why do we have the policy that #Reason|non-notable articles should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ONLYGUIDELINE||WP:DEL)

Comment: Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  Everything  |notable isnt necessarily encyclopedic.  No RS sources specifically discuss the subject 'List of James Bond's allies in Die Another day'.  There is nothing like Association_fallacy#Honor_by_association |encyclopedicity by association.  Just because Die another Day is encyclopedic, doesnt mean every triviality about it becomes worthy of its own article.  Merge all this info into some other article if you will, but this article by itself is simply contrived fancruft. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: without merging.  These characters are not famous beyond a single film, thus there is no reason to have a sub-article of nothing but plot detail.  If there needs to be clarification about the background of a specific character, it can be mildly expanded at Die Another Day#Cast, though it could definitely use some real-world context about each character and role.  This sub-article clearly violates .  There should not be this much information about the film without any context around it.  If the characters were recurring beyond this one film, then perhaps a case could be argued.  However, this article is nothing more than plot detail and also abuses  in having non-free images that are used for characters whose significance are hardly declared
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:NFC)