Deletion of Endgame (2007 film)

Comment: Per The New Republic, Los Angeles Times, Hotnews.ro, DVD Verdict, and DVD Talk. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: This clearly fails .  Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NF)

Comment: I think the argument for Josh Rosenblatt being a nationally recognised critic is convincing enough. That plus the DVD Talk review by Glenn Erickson qualify as the ''full length reviews by two or more nationally known critics'' required at otability (films
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: No, it does not fail . With respects, you forgot to make mention that  begins with the very important phrases "''As with all subjects, a film should satisfy the |general notability guideline''" and "''A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in |reliable sources that are |independent of the subject''".  This film easily meets those important opening caveats that grant it notability.  The list you use as exclusionary is specifically described by |guideline as "''attributes that generally indicate, when supported with reliable sources, that the required sources are likely to exist''".  Guideline does not state that the attributes must exist in order to be notable, but acts to advise that if they do "''the required sources are likely to exist''" in order to encourage editors to be diligent in the searches for sources. The reliable sources meeting |notability were found without use of an inapplicable check-list of attributes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NF||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NF||WP:N)