Deletion of National Weather Service North Little Rock, Arkansas

Comment: Clearly a . Given the size of the city and the various other similar articles for similar sized cities, I don't see why the article was ever nominated for deletion. The National Wealther Service does important work. Deletionism at its worst is at play here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: By far a  proposition rather than full deletion for any of these (especially major city offices and Norman, Oklahoma, which the nom seems to have failed to do the most basic of  and most know as the major research center/forecast authority for tornadoes in the United States; same with Miami and the National Hurricane Center
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Chronic deletionism at its worst from one of our most strident deletionists. Sadly, Rusf10 has made admonished after having made previous bulk nominations and has too often failed to make the most basic analysis required by . Above and beyond failing to look for sources for each of the articles bundled into this nomination, it's unclear if there was even an effort to read articles such as National Weather Service Lincoln, Illinois, National Weather Service Miami, Florida and National Weather Service Norman, Oklahoma, which are indisputably notable. An out-and-out ban on AfD for Rusf10 should be seriously considered to end the further abuse of process
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)