Deletion of Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement

Comment: The quote from #Point of view forks doesn't mean that a "criticism of X" page shouldn't be created; otherwise, it would be impossible to create an article on an individual/organization's questionable behaviors which have raised public objections, regardless of the subject's notability. As far as I understand, the quote from #Point of view shows that '''both points of view''' (criticism + '''''not praise''''', but '''''responses to criticisms'''''), must be presented on the same page. This issue can be resolved by discussions on the talk page and additions of content, not by an AFD. Moreover, despite , I'm forced to note that there are many pages which start by "Criticism of...", and so I don't think we can assess one article's validity without taking those into account. Lastly, the word "Controversies" instead of "criticism" in the title appears to me more appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: although I'd prefer |more and |better sourcing, ''i.e.'' both in quantity and quality, for such controversial articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: obviously. To quote #Point of view forks: "All facts and significant points of view on a given subject '''should be treated in one article''' except in the case of an article spinout. ... This type of split is permissible '''only if written from a neutral point of view''' and must not be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article." Clearly an article that focuses on one point of view ''cannot'' be NPOV, by definition. If there is any useful content in this "criticism" article it should be merged into the main article, but it shouldn't be a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)