Deletion of Snow-white Miriam

Comment: A request for erifiability|verifiable |sources had been made and repeated on the article's talk page for some time.  If content is presented without sources, other editors have to attempt to verify it as best they can.  Wikipedia makes it the editor's responsibility to supply sources verifying their statements, and in checkable form, with names of books and journal citations. Editors who attempt to check on unsourced statements are providing a service. If the editor's own responsibility to |supply sources were complied with, and content kept consistent with the sources supplied, there would be no need for theories about what other editors' motives for fact-checking might be. A review of Wikipedia's o personal attacks policy might be in order.  Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: The article on Miriam could/should certainly refer to the (apparently just one) reference to her as being turned "white as snow."  But the rest of this article just seems like Torah or Bible commentary to me, and as such probably violates .  Unless the commentary itself is based on a legitimate scholar, and even then, we don't have individual articles for everything Maimonides wrote about. (for example.) Also, the title itself  seems to imply that the most important part of the story of Miriam is that she got struck with a disease.  I think that's inherently POV and I agree, controversial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)