Deletion of A Stranger in Paradise

Comment: The film has received reviews and coverage from publications including ''Los Angeles Times'' https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-stranger-in-paradise-review-20140214-story.html, ''The Dissolve'' https://thedissolve.com/reviews/569-a-stranger-in-paradise/, ''Variety (magazine)|Variety'' https://variety.com/2011/film/news/thesps-board-stranger-in-paradise-1118044518/, ''TimeOut Dubai'' https://web.archive.org/web/20140201190814/http://www.timeoutdubai.com/films/reviews/47963-a-stranger-in-paradise, ''BroadwayWorld'' https://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwtv/article/Thai-Mafia-Thriller-A-STRANGER-IN-PARADISE-With-Collin-Egglesfield-and-Stuart-Townsend-to-Hit-Theaters-214-20140205, and ''LA Weekly'' https://www.laweekly.com/movies/a-stranger-in-paradise-4136196. I believe that this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as noted above, the sources cited meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: as passes  and  with significant coverage including four full independent reviews in reliable sources such as The Los Angeles Times. That the reviews are critical is a good indication of independent analysis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:GNG)

Comment: due to meeting  as pointed out by {{ul|MarkZusab
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: replyto|MarkZusab}}, with much respect, there appears to be |more required to establish notability of a film than simply mentions in articles. Only two of those sources (''LA Times'' and ''The Dissolve'') are actual reviews written after the film's release, and they both shredded the film (not that a poor review affects notability, granted). The others, published before its release, are minor announcements about casting (e.g. ''Variety''), regurgitated press releases (e.g. ''BroadwayWorld''), a three-sentence synopsis (''TimeOut Dubai'') and so on. The majority of the articles suggested don't appear to constitute coverage except insofar as to say that the film exists. Then there's the apparent . Not arguing at all; simply providing a bit more info about the sources you suggested
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:COPYVIO)