Deletion of Halstead Property

Comment: Was on the fence with this one initially as there are a ton of references. However, looking closer, it comes down to . For instance, https://www.forbes.com/sites/omribarzilay/2017/05/09/no-amount-of-technology-can-replace-a-great-real-estate-agent/#6dc42d182478 this Forbes reference is good except it is an interview. I found quite a few in Google Book search for New York Mag but the coverage is all announcements or brief mentions. Got excited to see references from The New York Times but again, brief mentions or routine announcements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: There seems to be a clear consensus here that the AfDed company is not notable. There is also a suggestion that its parent company ''is'' notable and that someone should create an article about that company, which will be different both title-wise & content-wise to the above article. But that's outside the purview of this AfD, as this AfD is not about the ''Terra Holdings''. If someone has the time to find out the relevant sources along with creating that article, there |won't be any problem in recreating the above page as a redirect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)

Comment: Fails . If an article on the parent company is created in the future, sure the content here can be merged. But since it doesn't exist and this topic fails GNG, the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Terra Holdings, as per -R. I couldn't find in-depth coverage for Halstead Property in the third-party reliable sources to satisfy . The keep !voters made claims that its parent company Terra Holdings is notable, thereby there should be an article about that and that this company should be merged/redirected to the parent company. The parent company's article has already been created. And anyone is free to expand that. I would've !voted merge but there's hardly any merge-worthy content in the AfDed stub, as explained by me earlier. In any case, the redirecting will keep the revision history intact, so there won't be any problem in finding any useful bit
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:CORPDEPTH)