Deletion of Andreas Antonopoulos

Comment: Appears to meet  and  as referenced above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: What a mess this AfD is.  I did a HighBeam search and it returned 37 hits.  There are also sufficient reliable sources via Google searches to establish |general notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The nominator noted that ''"Most supporting statements/references will come from bit coin community "magazines" and "news" sites,"'' but a quick scan of the references (used appropriately) shows that accepted secondary sources such as PC World, NY Times, Fortune, Biz Journal, Oreilly, and Pando are used, in addition to the objectionable "topic specific" sources.  I see that GMaxwell (bitcoin dev) and Andreas Antonopoulos have both agreed with the AfD proposal, but possibly for the wrong reasons (see above and a http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2l97xj/wikipedia_page_for_andreas_antonopoulos_nominated/clsmv84 post at reddit.com). This article seems to easily meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Even a quick search for sources on google, gnews, and gscholar returned far more than enough sources to satisfy  or . --&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)