Deletion of Karen Klein

Comment: Non-encyclopedic nonsense and an inappropriate attempt to use Wikipedia to permanently record yet another  violation. People churn out privacy-invading videos every day and  is not satisfied just because a lot of passers by discussed it. Where is the |secondary source with an analysis of bullying or videos, and which mentions this case in any significant manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:N||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: per , , and . Also the usual embarrassing, unencyclopedic type nonsense that unfortunately crops up on Wikipedia, thus making WP a media outlet rather than an encylcopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:VICTIM)

Comment: Another trivial news item that the news media has gone way overboard on its reporting. Nothing special or notable about mean teenagers on a bus. Definitely . If this article stands, Wikipedia will have hit a new low. The reason these articles usually get kept after deletion discussions like these is because of the mob mentality of people thinking that if they are interested in the topic, then it must have its own article, despite it being against Wikipedia policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: easily fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The third criterion of  says that an article should be deleted if "it is not the case that the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented". It then goes on to clarify what is meant by significant: "The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources". This event has been covered in reliable sources multiple times and there have been follow up coverage since the immediate aftermath of the event. Sure 3 months down the road we're not likely to see this in the news, but then again we don't often see mention of John Hinckley, Jr in the news either yet we keep that article. I think the current redirect is fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Notability of the incident is clear.  It may need to be '''renamed''', but this is still a developing situation. She may end up running a charity or something, but ''for now'' the notability rests on the incident. Wikipedia is |not a crystal ball
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: As per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Although the person clearly fails , the viral video easily meets |notability.  I suggest renaming the article to '''Bus monitoring bullying video''' or '''Making The Bus Monitor Cry''' or something and refocusing the article from being about the person to be about the video and the public's reaction to it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:N)

Comment: Meets the  requirements, at least for now. Whether it will have long-lasting notability remains to be seen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to &quot;2012 Greece, NY School Bus Bullying Incident,&quot; which removes any and all violations of . This entry does not violate  because the event is highly verified, and is not predicated on any future speculation. It also does not violate , as it is not first-hand news journalism, but rather a summary of events and facts in other journalistic publications. Also, this clearly cannot be considered &quot;routine news reporting&quot; as an event which touches millions of people around the world in less than three days can by no means be considered &quot;routine.&quot; Furthermore, as the news media moves on from this event to other newsworthy items, the information here will eventually be the only available source of truth for the event, which I believe is one of the primary goals of Wikipedia - preserving information. Keep in mind the nation's persistent (not fleeting) attention towards the subject of bullying and the numerous lives which have been cut-short because of it. I also strongly encourage user
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I renamed the article to Bus monitor bullying video.  I'm not sure if that's the best name, but this addresses the  objections above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: based upon the event, per  and . The topic of the event and viral video has received significant coverage in reliable sources. See also , "Notability is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:BIO1E||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: Plenty of coverage in |reliable, third party sources. Meets the . Change the focus, as per a number of editors have suggested already, if it helps garner consensus and fall within policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)