Deletion of Bruno Bernard (writer) (2nd nomination)

Comment: The main text of the article, on his fraud conviction, does not appear to pass . The "works" section is long but mostly looks like a bunch of repeat translations of cookie-cutter how-to books, not scholarly works; unless we can find published reviews, they do not pass . What remains is the Order of Academic Palms, but if he has no scholarly work to speak of then he cannot be notable as a scholar, and we would have to treat him as any businessperson who got an award at that level with that kind of brief announcement: worth mentioning in an article, but not in-depth enough to contribute towards GNG-type notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIMINAL||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: It's never a good sign when you're establishing notability and can't quite find ''the'' Bruno Bernard we're talking about here. https://www.theguardian.com/profile/bruno-bernard I assume this guy, writing for The Guardian? "Bruno Bernard is a former senior researcher for the UMP party and senior political officer for the British embassy in Paris", so he's certainly a writer. But that's not notability - and I also note the BLP is unlikely to pass anyone's idea of a balanced, full biography of a notable figure. Parsing the writer is hard, as has been noted - having tried my best to do so, I'm convinced the one we're looking at doesn't pass . Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)