Deletion of Stephen Heymann

Comment: Kinda embarrassing to be agreeing with the last bit of invective, but, stripped of the vitriol, 192.30.100.251 has a point. There should be enough coverage of other prosecutions, most especially the connection to another computer hactivist who committed suicide after being exposed to Mr. Heymann's tender prosecutorial mercies to make out .  I think the right course here is to find them and flesh out the article, getting us past the  threshhold, not delete the article aborning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I've added another source for the Gonzalez/Wall prosecution and moved derogatory, sourced stuff out of the lede, per . There's a lot more out there, that's not Swartz-related. Please help rescue this article about this |notable person. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:N)

Comment: The subject passes , as they were gaining coverage before the recent Swartz controversy. See the http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/magazine/14Hacker-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 New York Times piece from 2010 which contains some biographical info, for example. Couple that with the sources about the Swartz case and he seems to qualify for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)