Deletion of Chowkidar Chor Hai

Comment: for now. I can see concerns about , , lasting encyclopedic value etc and maybe in a year we can look back and, based on amount/type of coverage in non-news media, judge whether Chowkidar Chor Hai, Main bhi chowkidar etc are better off merged back into 2019 Indian general election. That said, the existence of the article does not present BLP concerns because, (1) wikipedia reporting (based on reliable sources) about an opposition party making political insinuations about the ruling party and its leader is not equivalent to wikipedia making those insinuations, and (2) the Indian PM is clearly a |public figure and the slogan is clearly a ''political'' opinion/attack (I would be more concerned if a literal 'chowkidar' was being called a thief; or, if a public figure was being accused of, say, beating their children
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:PUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: Multiple independent secondary sources that seem to be |reliable that give significant coverage to the slogan itself (https://indianexpress.com/elections/slogan-acche-din-aayenge-has-changed-to-chowkidar-chor-hai-rahul-gandhi-5629831/ Indian Express, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/elections/news/youth-congs-main-bhi-berozgar-campaign-to-counter-bjps-main-bhi-chowkidar/articleshow/68649541.cms Times of India, https://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/chowkidar-chor-hai-uddhav-thackeray-uses-rahul-gandhis-jibe-to-attack-modi_in_5c213722e4b08aaf7a8b856f Huffington Post, https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/narendra-modi-urges-supporters-to-take-main-bhi-chowkidar-pledge/cid/1686940 The Telegraph), means it definitely passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)