Deletion of Get Better Records

Comment: thanks to the improvements by {{u|AleatoryPonderings}}. I agree there should be more references that speak to the label itself, (most of the sources cover the musicians, which is why my !vote is weak because ), however I think the it is now over the edge of notability. LA Weekly is a reliable source, as  are Billboard and Pitchfork; I've always thought Bandcamp was user generated material, but I may be wrong about that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I see two sources in the article in respectable publications—''Billboard (magazine)|Billboard'' and ''LA Weekly''—both of which have bylines. But I would like to have , hence my keep being weak. I am not sure how one can determine by stylistic analysis alone that a news article in a respectable publication is sponsored content, and I disagree with the nom's reading of these sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)