Deletion of Material Sciences Corporation

Comment: nbsp; http://www.google.com/finance?cid=357706, http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/material-sciences-corporation-history/, http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~anhai/wisc-si-archive/data/company_profiles/yahoo/instances/company-index/Basic_Materials/Misc._Fabricated_Products/instances/http:%5E%5Ebiz.yahoo.com%5Ep%5Em%5Emsc.html.&nbsp; As per these sources, company was listed on NYSE as MSC, now listed on NASDAQ as MASC.&nbsp; As per , "...''articles'' are not notable or non-notable, ''topics'' are. Per , topic notability is based upon source availability, rather than the state of sourcing in articles...See also .''(See Wikipedia:NOIMPROVEMENT#Nobody.27s_working_on_it_.28or_impatience_with_improvement.29|§ Nobody's working on it (or impatience with improvement), above, for the related argument that the subject must not be notable if people aren't working on it.)''"&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOIMPROVEMENT||WP:NEXIST||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: sources presented at this AfD do not meet  to build an NPOV article. This material might as equally be housed on the company web site. I thus do not find this page to be of value to the project
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: There are sufficient sources, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The available sources do not demonstrate that this passes either  or , and I've been unable to find anything better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a former publicly traded company, which gives it |permanent notability. Even if it had since gone out of business, it would deserve a page. The article should notice the privatization and consolidations. Those are encyclopedic changes. There is clearly encyclopedic content on this subject with  to support that fact
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:RS)

Comment: I agree with both the previous  rationales. This is a poorly-sourced article on a company which was previously public but was acquired in early 2014 http://www.themiddlemarket.com/news/zink-pays-139-million-to-take-material-sciences-private-248603-1.html. There is mention of the name in subsequent ongoing consolidations (https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-467816221.html {{Highbeam}}) but I am seeing nothing beyond routine announcements. Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (:WP:PROD||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)