Deletion of Jeannette H. Lee

Comment: I've gone through the new sources mentioned above and most of them are mentions-in-passing, "who's who" material, regurgitation of Lee's own official bio or her company's press releases, rehash of ''Working Woman'' material already cited, local papers, parroting WP's own article, etc. But the second ''Washington Post'' piece is a real, focused article in a major paper.  Combined with the other good source already cited, this seems marginally enough to keep, if the article is actually improved with this material. One of them, the more recent company press release, is good enough as a primary source for what company she works at now (well, as of 2016) and that she's back to using Lee (seems to satisfy ).  Should probably be moved to Jeannette H. Lee
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:ABOUTSELF)