Deletion of Prohaska Consulting

Comment: There is nothing in the article that suggests any notability. Its a run-of-the-mill consultancy firm that produces its own research (presumably in order to sell more services). None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability which, as has been pointed out above, must be "intellectually independent" ... that is, the references must provide in-depth analysis and/or opinion on the company. None of the references do that. While there may not be much "marketing language" in the article, I note that the article still manages to insert (as references) links to "research" published by this company. I would argue that in the context of the paucity of references in general for this topic, those links could be construed as promotional. References fail  and/or , topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: run-of-the-mill consultancy" is about right. Nothing worth salvaging here; completely non notable. Fails  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH)