Deletion of Integrated change control management

Comment: The topic could be notable, a quick google search beings plenty of results and google books hits on the subject. However, the article is plainly |not written as an encycolpedia article. This would place it under , but I am hesitant to !vote delete as the topic could be notable - I | have reservations around . To rewrite it would be the better option here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:DEL14||WP:TNTTNT||WP:TNT)

Comment: In theory, there might be a valid article about this topic but this isn't it, for the  reasons cited above.  It's also hard to see how this differs significantly from Change control, but even a redirect to there seems pointless because I don't see anybody ever typing this into a search box.  On the other hand, redirects are , so I don't have any real objection to redirecting if somebody feels it would be useful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:CHEAP)