Deletion of Revolutionary spontaneity

Comment: Even if the claim is true* that the current content violates |NPOV, it is not a valid argument for deletion. The solution is to improve the content, not to delete this article on a notable concept. *I for one don't see what the NPOV problem is. &nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE)

Comment: I see no  violations.  Sure, the content needs fleshing out, perhaps mentioning that it is admired and the myth of a Menshevik-style revolution which required spontaneity was kept up for years because it was a founding principle of the USSR as opposed to a Bolshevik-style revolution where a small number of trained people take key installations.  Hey, I might do it myself when I've got the sourcing together.  Either way, this is a misguided AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)