Deletion of AVATAR (MUD)

Comment: if perhaps somewhat uncomfortably.  Huge group AfDs tend to be a bad idea unless the articles themselves are virtually identical, and these aren't.  That said, I agree with the nominator's assertation that these have little-to-no claims of notability and lack independant references.  In short, none of these would pass an individual AfD by our current standards, nor do they meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: You can't just lump all these together and claim they are ALL non-notable in a single AfD. I think this AfD should be speedily closed, and then each MU* re-listed seperately. But for the record, people who are saying 'X MUD is notable' |prove it with |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)