Deletion of Dick Cheney's health

Comment: POV fork about a |living person.  We do not need articles about the health problems of various individuals, and this  needs to be nipped in the bud lest it become a trend
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: or possibly '''merge''' if it's felt that some of the unique content is worth retaining. Not really worthy of a separate article under  as most of it's duplication and the remainder appears to be non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: There would be no reason to have a Joe Biden's Health article because it is not an issue.  However, there is continual coverage on Dick Cheney's health. It meets  because it there is significant coverage year after year, the coverage is reliable, the sources are ironclad like CNN, it is independent of the coverage (the sources of his heart attack is not dickcheney.com).  Just because the article is not perfectly written does not mean it gets deleted.  Otherwise 70% of Wikipedia gets deleted.  Also hating Cheney and wanting him dead or deleted does not mean that the article is deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP is |not news, and to the extent this is encyclopedic, it belongs in the main article on Cheney
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This was originally closed as no consensus.  Then the admin had off-wiki consultation (he admits to consultation) and a flood of delete votes accompanied his re-opening of it.  Two people have claimed re-opening is permitted but none have pointed the policy allowing it after I asked.  Further nobody has refuted the fact that the article meets all bullet points of .  AFD is not a vote according to the rules.  GNG prevails
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)