Deletion of Claudine de Culam

Comment: per Jackattack. As a stand alone article it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: to Trial of Claudine de Culam or similar. The article and all SIGCOV provided is about the trial not the individual. This probably is best presented as a section in a larger article or as part of a list (i.e. ), but that can be done boldly through the normal editing process, or a merge discussion if it really comes to that, and doesn't need to be sorted at afd. Regards, Special:Contributions/31.41.45.190|31.41.45.190
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: IP is right. In my view, as someone who was punished in a historically notable case, the subject clearly merits an article on its own (= meets notability, to put it in Wikipedia's parlance). While one can reasonably argue in favour of a change to a more suitable title, it is quite misleading to say that this does not meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Meets  per https://books.google.com/books?id=gS8hBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT128https://books.google.com/books?id=m9_Qsh8aBpgC&pg=PA95
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)