Deletion of Snap music

Comment: About.com coverage or not, this article's not really up to WP standards of |notability or |original research restrictions. If the subject is notable, there's got to be better |reliable sources out there to include in the article than what's there now (one of the sources doesn't even mention snap). A Google search for better sources reveals some privately maintained blogs (not RS), some trivial, trivial coverage on MTV.com and the about.com article which lists no sources. So what do we use to put together an encyclopedic article? If more, better sources are found I'm open to recreating, but my deletionist streak says that we should find the sources first, ''then'' create the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:NOR||WP:RS)

Comment: My initial impulse upon reading the unsourced hodgepodge would be to be |bold and redirect to hip hop, but if someone spends some time removing the lists and adding |cited information telling more about the music itself (instead of the gossip-like politics of the genre, this could most likely stand quite well on its own
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD||WP:CITE)