Deletion of Uyghur guest houses suspected of ties to islamist militancy

Comment: The wikipedia is not a hagiography.  Contrary to the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uyghur_guest_houses_suspected_of_ties_to_islamist_militancy&diff=361279726&oldid=361277890 speedy deletion justification our nomator offered, that this article ''"specifically targets the Uyghur ethnic group"'', it references and reports, using a |neutral point of view what  which single out specific Uyghur guest houses as suspicious had to say.  Nominator and I have had numerous discussions.  I have found that when they challenge material as ''"misleading"'' they don't seem to distinguish between wikipedians lapsing from the neutral point of view, and contributing material that doesn't neutrally report what  say, and neutral reporting of  where, in their personal opinion, they consider the original  to be misleading.  This is a serious mistake.  When an article neutrally reports what  say it should not be described as misleading, without regard to whether individual wikipedians regard the  as misleading
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: The lack of articles from "mainstream" media is somewhat troubling. Also, the selection of refs that are used appear to violate  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NPOV)

Comment: this looks like it may violate 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)