Deletion of Fredrik Svensk

Comment: My only question is whether there's an argument for  C8 or similar here.  Editorship of a well-established publication like Palatten is not nothing.  (But this is the only assertion of notability in the article, and I didn't see anything else on searching
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: per . Per WP:GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:CSK)

Comment: I'm not convinced that being co-editor-in-chief of an art magazine is the sort of academic journal leadership described in #C8 and if not for that we would need evidence of passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Haven't seen enough yet to make a determination on notability or lack thereof either here or on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paletten (2nd nomination)|related nomination of Paletten, but I dispute the notion that  #2 applies here.  I've helped process many a nomination by an IP or a new account, and while these have, to put it charitably, varied widely in terms of merit, that does not mean that they have not been made in good faith.  Nom is persistent--I'll assume that this is the same person as the one behind the IPs who had AfD-tagged the articles previously (which I reverted as incomplete noms)--but I see no indication that the intent is frivolous, vexatious, or malicious.  Unless something new comes up, the discussion should proceed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:CSK)