Deletion of Mammoth Tank (2nd nomination)

Comment: per http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Mammoth+Tank existence of numerous reliable sources that even demonstrate that real world models have been made beyond the appearance in the games, which means the game guidelines alone cannot suffice in this case,  is never a good argument, it is consistent per our First pillar with a specialized encyclopedia on video games or a specialized encyclopedia on toys/models or a specialized encyclopedia on fictional weapons, etc.  Our reader are http://stats.grok.se/en/200804/Mammoth%20Tank clearly interested in this article.  In order to reach a real consensus, I encourage http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mammoth_Tank&limit=500&action=history these editors to be notified of this discussion.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: for the exact same reasons cited by Edison, fails  due to lack of non-trivial coverage by ''third party'' publications or sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails |notability due to the lack of independent and reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Absence of secondary sources causes it to fail , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:N)