Deletion of Harry Stickel

Comment: although this is quite a good article in my opinion, unfortunately it doesn't meet the notablity requirement for "significant coverage" in |reliable sources under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a well worked on article, however the subject fails , and some of the references sources do not meet |reliable source standards. The ancestry.com source (presently #4), yuku.com source is a forum and thus is a |self published source, harrydole.com is a self-published vanity webpage, military records such as that hosted by fold3.com are primary sources but do not cover the subject ''in-depth'' enough to meet . The only source that may hold up is from the local paper, however it is an obit, and thus the subject of this article would fall under , and since it is not a major paper the subject of this article may also fall under . My opinion of the notability of the subject of the article, does not mean that I do not respect the Staff Sergeants service, however Wikipedia may not be the best place for this content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:RS||WP:SPS||WP:GNG||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:LOCALFAME)

Comment: Doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)