Deletion of David Tucker (singer)

Comment: Meets  based on cited sources.  is more permissive - a topic that meets  will also meet  per point #1 there. See above discussion for more detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: not yet notable per  , no significant coverage online from .  at best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Unfortunately this doesn't meet . First, the sources are local and we do not use it for GNG purposes. Secondly, I'm worried about the quality of sources. http://local12.com/news/local/dreams-coming-true-small-town-singer-gets-noticed This is essentially a listing for a show {{tq|''Tucker will perform Kentucky Bred for the first time before an audience Saturday, May 14, at the historic Russell Theater in Maysville. People can get tickets for the show on Tucker's website. CLICK HERE for the website.''}} with a few added in quotes by his manager and parents and himself. This is not what I call a significant secondary coverage. In addition, the tone of the article makes me doubt if this has gone through an editorial review. The http://www.maysville-online.com/entertainment/david-tucker-drivin-on-to-a-country-music-career/article_d416ee14-4f15-511c-8914-88cb459e0d32.html other source is a local source as well although the tone is much better and this has a bit more content. However, both sources essentially confirm it is . Had there been one more national source, I would have considered. But at this time, this is a delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: As it happens, I share some of the concerns about excluding "local" sources ''prima facie''. If a subject were covered in several "local" (which usually just means smaller--The New York Times associates itself with a location, too!) outlets from different places, that would mean something to me about the subject's notability both in the colloquially sense, and, more importantly, for : if this musician had been covered in smaller papers in, say, Illinois, Texas, Wyoming and Kentucky, then I think we could start to see we have the necessary "multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article." But I don't think two sources from, essentially, the subject's hometown suffices to offer a balance of perspectives
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WHYN)

Comment: u|MSJapan}}, {{u|Johnpacklambert}}, {{u|OnionRing}}: what part of  #1 (basically ) is not being met here by the cited sources? These look like reliable sources and coverage is clearly significant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)