Deletion of Rabbit Fever (2009 film)

Comment: Film has been completed and is pending release, and has received notice from significant secondary sources.   certainly pertains, but the article is still salvageable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: There's another problem along with all the others - all of the lead text appears to be copyright violation / plagiarism of film promotional material. Google "impressively competitive and undeniably quirky competitors" and see what happens. Even the sentence under "Production Notes" that is cited to a reliable source appears to be based on text on the film's own website. I'm inclined to think the current article should be deleted and if a non-COI editor wants to resurrect the subject, they can go ahead. Deletion isn't |salting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: not a great article at the moment (and IMdb is not a reliable source for what it's worth) but there seems to have enough coverage by |reliable sources to establish |notability per the general notability criteria. There is coverage in http://content.usatoday.com/communities/popcandy/post/2009/08/cool-movie-alert-rabbit-fever/1 USA Today and http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/new-documentary-film-rabbit-fever-chronicles-rabbit-circuit/ from Fox Business as well as the more local coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN)