Deletion of Mark Bezos

Comment: per : ''If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate.'' Being one of four on that crew would be significant enough, in my opinion, even if he weren't Jeff Bezos' brother. He has - by completing the flight - qualified as a commercial astronaut, a distinction held by only 7 people at present. Being one of eight (or eleven if you include the entire crew of this flight) to achieve that status would, separately, be significant enough in my opinion. Whether we like it or not, (and regardless of how he got there; one of the others bought his place at auction) he will be considered a pioneer of commercial space flight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: The subject is clearly notable now that they are a pioneering astronaut.  Any profile of him is clearly going to mention his famous brother too but that's unavoidable and so is not a reason to delete.  The nomination does not seem to have done any  and additional detailed sources seem easy to find such as this https://www.standard.co.uk/insider/mark-bezos-jeff-bezos-brother-space-blue-origin-b939310.html extensive profile in the ''Evening Standard'' – familiar to me as a major London newspaper.  This demonstrates international detailed coverage – an easy pass of .  See ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BASIC||WP:ATD||WP:NEXIST||WP:DINC)

Comment: As stated by {{u|Andrew Davidson}} above, "any profile of him is clearly going to mention his famous brother too." Analyzing this based on , we need to determine if he is being mentioned in press about his brother or if his brother is being mentioned in press about him. Mark would meet  as there is significant coverage ABOUT HIM that mentions Jeff, not just significant coverage ABOUT JEFF that mentions him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)