Deletion of Judy Dushku

Comment: The content of the article seems extremely trivial and lacking in-depth detail. Plus, it's clearly written to shed her in an overly positive light. The lead about her standing in Mormon feminism (however one gets that) is questionable, as there's nothing really later on in the article about it. Except that she was involved with a magazine that printed feminist articles, among other subjects. The thing about Exponent II is questionable to establish notability also because its just a none profit journal that isn't associated with the church and might not even be notable on it's own. She's notable by association of being one of 4 people that brought it back though. Let alone just for doing a column in it. There's nothing that applies just on her academic accomplishments either as she doesn't seem to have a had a significant impact on anything, hasn't held a highest level post, or accomplished anything else  mentions. Just being a professor doesn't qualify
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: I have edited the article to remove bad sources and added some new ones from prominent newspapers. She still easily passes  and there is enough to make a case for her as a public leader. As an aside
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as far as I can tell on a first pass scrutiny.  Does not professor pass ?  The ''Sisters Help'' of Exponent II seems significant enough.https://archive.org/details/exponentii174arli/page/20/mode/2up/search/Dushku, https://archive.org/details/exponentii201arli/page/2/mode/2up, ... .   I'm not sure this fully addresses the nom.s concern then.  This is a new article and AfD nom. may relate to page curation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)