Deletion of Robert Gifford

Comment: GS cites start off with 476, 84, 72, 70, 50...with an h index of at least 20, so if these cites are identified correctly rof is passed easily. As for Anthony Cox, Wikipedia, unlike the British Who's Who, is not a compendium of the great and the good. Notable rogues are included as well (but I don't suggest that the subject is one of those
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Editor in chief of a well-established journal, meets  #8. Note to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Setting aside the Conflict of Interest/Autobiography issues, the article is written fairly and neutrally, and is supported by references. The subject easily meets the criteria of . He is a full professor at a major university and editor of a significant journal. At Google Scholar, his book has been cited 478 times, and several of his papers 50+ times, indicating that his work is significant in his field. I see that the COI and notability warnings have been removed from the article, and I concur. One additional thing the article needs, and I would have no problem with Dr. Gifford adding the information himself, is a simple listing of where he obtained his degrees
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)