Deletion of Fire needle acupuncture

Comment: Obviously passes  per sources in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fire_needle_acupuncture&oldid=709371752 current version as well as some above, which can be used to flesh it out beyond a stub.  (3rd para in lede) says that only ''biomedical'' content must pass MEDRS and that non-medical content in medical articles is held to RS standards.  That's even more true for traditional/alt-med articles, where by definition we're (in large part, at least) outside of biomedicine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MEDRS)

Comment: very selectively and '''Redirect''' to Acupuncture#Fire needle acupuncture. All biomedical content (it doesn't matter if it's eastern/traditional medicine) needs sourcing that passes . Yes, there are sociological, historical, etc. topics that do not necessarily require medical sources, but anything to do with procedures, treatments, efficacy, etc. does. What the sprawling list of sources says to me is that this shouldn't be deleted, but rather included in the main acupuncture article, but I don't see a stand-alone article for this technique. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: per nom. Very few, if any, reliable sources that I could find on Google Books or Google Scholar. There are a few passing mentions in some books, but that's not enough to meet . I would also be fine with a redirect to acupuncture
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)