Deletion of Nagina Group (2nd nomination)

Comment: Excellent analysis by Piotrus above, summarised as "if, after 50 years, there aren't any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, then it isn't notable". Nonsense arguments which are not based on our guidelines put forward by Keep !voters above. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Things get a bit tough with cases like this, where we are not dealing with some obvious promo/spam attempt for a start up. It's a mid size company with ~50 years of history. But pretty please, we need sources that are not press releases, and that's all there is in the article. Google Books gives me a snippet " Nagina Group, one of the oldest textile groups in the country, consisting of Nagina Cotton Mills Ltd. Ellcot Spinning Mills Ltd and Prosperity Weaving Mills Limited" https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=cAAcAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Nagina+Group%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Nagina+Group%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiakaK28M3kAhXDJaYKHc3RA5IQ6AEIKTAA. And that's all I am seeing in Books/Scholar. We have to face the fact that  is subjective and not a valid. In its half a century of a history, this company doesn't seem to have attracted any serious attention from anyone willing to write about that outside or passing mentions/press releases of 'business as usual'. Therefore, this is  type of a fail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSIMPORTANT||WP:YELLOWPAGES)