Deletion of Bad science methods

Comment: per OP.  The article is rant that presents problems that are very real, but completely out of context. The most negative views that can be found in the literature are cherrypicked for inclusion in violation of .  While one could argue for attempting to edit this into some semblance of a reasonable article, I don't see it as salvagable, as "what is good is not new, and what is new is not good
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: nice effort, but I don't think it belongs here. It is almost like a how to, and I think  applies. The list is potentially endless, a better article would be about correct scientific technique. I am somewhat reminded of the barometer question,  something that sounds bad could be good, and vice versa
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)