Deletion of Anthony Rodriguez (pianist)

Comment: Per the results and explanation given by Oshwah. There's a lot of PR gobbleygook going on in this article, and I detect a hint of possible  going on as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I did manage to find some sources that appear to meet the criterion for , such as http://blog.charitymiles.org/post/65638485009/every-day-we-like-to-shine-a-spotlight-on-people this interview, http://jazzreview.com/jazz-news/news-story/pianist-anthony-rodriguez.html this review, http://urbansocialitesnj.com/2015/03/nmnj-artist-of-the-week-anthony-rodriguez/ this article, http://www.celestialspaceradio.com/tag/anthony-rodriguez/ this source, http://urbansocialitesnj.com/2013/12/december-1-on-one-in-10-anthony-rodriguez/ this interview, http://www.godtodayfreenewsletter.org/music/poetology.html this interview, and https://hireinfluence.com/blog/all/spotlight-interview-entertainment-influencer-anthony-rodriguez/#ardisgirl1458930403 this one. Is there enough to assert ''significant coverage''? I think so - there's enough coverage where no |original research is needed in order to extract information and create an article. The issue I'm having is with  and . I don't believe that the article subject meets any notability criterion involving ''people''. He doesn't seem to meet , as his music doesn't appear to have reached any national charts or won any national or notable awards. I also don't believe that the person meets  as well, as his literary work hasn't made him a significant or important figure or monument nor has it originated a new concept. Sure, having your book as an Amazon best-seller is great, but I couldn't locate any independent sources ''outside'' of Amazon that discuss his success as an author or any national awards that his books have won. Falling back to , he hasn't won a significant award or honor and he hasn't made a widely recognized contribution that is part of any enduring historical record (or history). So, he doesn't appear to meet that guideline as well. When it comes to the ''general notability guideline'', I think that is arguable if the requirements are met or not - sources ''do'' exist that appear to check out. However, when it comes to asserting the notability of the article subject as a ''person'', I think he still falls short. Hence, I am going with ''delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOR||WP:NMUSIC||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NMUSIC||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:ANYBIO)