Deletion of Standard of living in the People's Republic of China

Comment: I think all you "keep" !voters are a little confused by our point of view. It's not that the subject itself isn't notable, but the fact that it's written in an essay form makes it look like an unnecessary |content fork. '''Erpert
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: but this article could be recreated.  I do not believe this is content forking; I wish such articles were possible for every country.  In this case however, there is a lot of content here with no in-line citations and it is hard to put any of it into the "source."  The content does not meet  because verification is not a theoretical matter - the editor must present content in a way that users can reasonably verify.  Giving a single citation to a huge source does not meet V.  Also, the content is not encyclopedic and is filled with speculation. The source is good for some things, but does not meet WP:RS for everything.  Delete now, and recreate when someone wants to devote time to this massive, difficult project
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per . Well-written, but it isn't suitable for Wikipedia, I'm afraid. '''Erpert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)