Deletion of List of fictional medical examiners

Comment: As far as I understand a list is justified on Wikipedia either as a sensible grouping of topics that are treated somewhere on Wikipedia (or have secondary sources), or because the topic, in this case fictional medical examiners, itself is notable. I feel the nomination does not make clear on both points why this should not be the case here. I think that |"I feel it isn't encyclopedic" does not carry any weight as long as it is not supported by more arguments. Sure, this list can be improved, e.g. by citations (though by its nature, the entries themselves already give primary sourcing), but that |is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:ATD)

Comment: The nomination provides no specifics or evidence.  Here's an example of coverage per  from ''https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(04)17643-5.pdf The Lancet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: This fD reminds me quite a bit of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco-terrorism in fiction, where the outcome was converting a list article that looked like Special:PermaLink/979987651|this into a prose article that looked like Special:PermaLink/991740265|this. Listing every time concept X appears in a work of fiction is something TV Tropes does; we should strive to write something ''about'' concept X in fiction, not just enumerate examples. This applies outside of fiction too, of course—it is the difference between writing the article Climate of London and creating the article list of rainy days in London. The article linked by {{noping|Andrew Davidson}} provides a good example of how to write something ''about'' medical examiners in fiction—how they are depicted, trends in popularity over time, implications for the public's perception of the profession, and so on—and shows that we could do the same thing. I would be in favour of converting this list article to a prose article as was done with Eco-terrorism in fiction, although unlike in that case it we would obviously need to change the title as well here to not be called "list of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)