Deletion of Bone spectacles

Comment: It's a  claim that even the OOPart crowd hasn't bothered to recognize
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:REDFLAG)

Comment: The article cites six sources, mostly described as in Persian (presumably Farsi).  I would guess that these consist of an archaeological report of '''1962''' on the excavation and one article interpreting the find, whose conclusions have then been repeated in several books - tertiary sources, but still potentailly , and in a 2010 journal that might only be a trade rag - I may be wrong.  The excavation report will be a .  The interpretation article is presumably from an academic source, which will also be .  Whehter the interpretation is correct is a different question, but without a source that questions it, a WP article doubting the conclusions would be .  I agree that the find is an oddity, but if not spectacales, what is it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:OR)