Deletion of SubscriptionBridge

Comment: no evidence that this company meets the |general notability criteria or the |company criteria. None of the provided references are adequate (the Bloomsberg one doesn't appear to show them on the list of companies; the PRWeb one is a press release from the company - so not independent - and the Practical Ecommerce one is not significant coverage, and appears to be wholly based on information provided by the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ORG)

Comment: Article should have been speedily deleted per .  SD tag could have been reapplied since it was removed by  IP with two edits.  Since we're here, company fails  and .  A https://www.google.com/search?q=SubscriptionBridge&hl=en&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=wxbrT8HWC7KC2gWWoqnHAQ&ved=0CEIQ_AUoBA&biw=1642&bih=687 Google News search produces one article with a large list of companies (no significant coverage) that includes this company.  The other article makes no mention of this company but a co-founder spammed the comment section with SubscriptionBridge info.  A https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=1642&bih=687&tbs=ar%3A1&tbm=nws&q=%22SubscriptionBridge%22&oq=%22SubscriptionBridge%22&gs_l=serp.3...3115.3467.0.3626.2.2.0.0.0.0.101.200.1j1.2.0...0.0.QSWIhhT7iFE Google News Archive search produces no independent and significant coverage from a reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7||WP:SPA||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)