Deletion of Pierre Picault

Comment: For Goux, the burden of citations and verifiability ALWAYS lies '''on the individual who added the material''', so please do not be |uncivil to another editor as you were above. I noticed that you !voted Keep. On what criteria do you base that on? Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:UNCIVIL)

Comment: Celery, I'm going to warn you again not to be |uncivil. It's not tolerated here and, frankly, it's not helping your argument any. If there is another article with the same level of citation, then you should point it out. I will note that I have  successfully nominated several poorly-cited veteran articles and also plan to nominate Battista Serioli for a second time in due course. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:UNCIVIL)

Comment: Some edits on Wikipedia are responded to more quickly than others.  I believe this is not generally due to prejudice, but because it can take time for an editor to notice an edit that needs to be addressed.  I happened to check the article in question soon after you had made the edit I proceeded to reverse.  The fact that I reverted your change, 78.145.35.67, within "seconds", was a coincidence as a result.  You may not believe me, but it is the truth.  The source cited in Goux's article is reliable, imo, but I believe its coverage of him is trivial.  According to otability (people), "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability".  What I have quoted is a guideline, but I believe trivial coverage in one reliable source is not enough to establish notability for Goux.  78.145.35.67, you said "One of the other articles has the same level of citation".  Please could you tell me which article that is?  I ask because I would like to investigate it, to see if it deserves to be on Wikipedia.  You also said "or just because you don't know about it. That's because you know nothing about this article."  I do not see how my knowledge of the article on Goux has anything to do with my knowledge of another article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)