Deletion of Bayan Fenwick

Comment: per  Fenix down and GiantSnowman. The subject has not yet established notability within his field. This is a clear case of  coverage. It is likely that the subject will become notable in future given his current career trajectory. However, |wikipedia is not a crystal ball and the article should be deleted for now. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: doesn't pass . Standard transfer talk, nothing substantial that tells us anything about his career and all 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Far too . Nearly any footballer in any club could fall into this. I would say that  helps shed a bit of light on this (even though its not a college football team).  Jcmcc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DOGBITESMAN||WP:NCOLLATH)

Comment: possibly  who knows, he might play sometime for a bigger team, but right now he's in the fifth tier and fails  and the refs in the article are , and most are not really in-depth about Fenwick
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NFOOTY||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Fails  as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. All the sources cited in the article are |routine transfer reporting by local newspapers. The long standing consensus at  is that transfer / match reporting doesn ot count towards establishing GNG. There is nothing of any substance published at any level that would garner significant attention on this player
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:FOOTY)

Comment: fails  and . Not enough significant coverage, most of what is present is  transfer news and simply not in-depth enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)