Deletion of Michael J. LaCour

Comment: incident has generated enough interest to pass .  I would  suggest '''moving''' it to an article about the paper, rather than the author, unless coverage shifts focus from the incident to the man.  Incident is a big deal, coverage is ongoing, article needs expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . The single controversial study is currently in the news, and may be discussed or not in relevant Wikipedia articles if appropriate per , but the author need not be red-linked, nor does he yet merit a pseudo-biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:BLP1E||WP:DUEWEIGHT)

Comment: this article is not acceptable as a , wholly . This is what is called a "pseudobiography" - writing about a scandal and titling it with the person's name. The ''only'' thing about him is the first sentence. Move to When Contact Changes Minds
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:UNDUE)