Deletion of Advanced SystemCare (2nd nomination)

Comment: I am seeing reviews from websites that I would consider  like PC Mag and TechRadar. Just because this incarnation of the article is poorly written doesn't mean it is inherently not notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Poorly written, very promotional and fails |GNG. A solid delete vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: IObit is an Indian outfit, so it has a very large user base. In the UK they pushed it heavily about 5-8 years ago, and it is well known around the world. Passes . Clean the article up and remove the promotion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per nomination. Subject fails . The sources cited in the article is a |Wikipedia mirror site and a Google Play product listing. And that is all, I'm afraid. Even if all the (blatant) |promotional slant of the text is righted up through deletion, we still have no sources. Which is why, in suggestions to Keep, we see only |unsupported claims to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:FORK||WP:PROMO||WP:JNN)

Comment: Fails /
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: A quick search on Google Books returns only 3 passing mentions of the product, and the results on Google News are just regular announcements of new versions and reviews which are nothing special. Clear failure of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)