Deletion of List of Internet slang

Comment: Despite WP:NOT, this list is both useful and used.  I'm not usually one to say this, but sometimes  is good, and in those cases we should emphasize practice over policy.  We have a lot of lists that are pretty useless that haven't had their legitimacy ever called into question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: The List of Latin phrases, List of French phrases, List of German words and phrases would also be under , but each serves as a useful list not under controversy because of usage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'm |ignoring  on purpose here.  I agree with above commenters that while dicdefs are generally undesirable, a specialized glossary (which this is) is not necessarily so.  If we keep it pared down to something reasonable, it will remain useful and encyclopedic.  Directing users to Urban Dictionary (or even Wiktionary) is overkill for something like this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:NOT)

Comment: If these dictionary definitions don't deserve a mention in individual articles in the first place, why should they suddenly deserve a mention in Wikipedia once they're clumped up together into this article? By combining the dictionary definitions into a single page, it just means that the user has to go through the trouble of scrolling to the term he/she is looking for, as opposed to having it show up in an article by itself. It also appears to have become a popular article for miscellaneous nonsense and vandalism. See in  where it says: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, 1. Dictionary definitions. 2. Lists of such definitions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)