Deletion of Suzy Gorman

Comment: Plenty of "non-trivial" references, etc. If there's an issue involving how the article is presented, then  should be considered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: as article creator).  Because of Gorman's famous "gruff" demeanor, she tends to accumulate enemies who attack the article from time to time. I'm a bit surprised that this went to an actual AfD debate, since the db tag was a pretty obvious bad faith nom from a throwaway account: {{user|Henriducard}}, and the tag probably should have just been deleted as vandalism. For the record though, yes, Gorman clearly passes . Notable body of work, multiple non-trivial mentions in major press. Otherwise I wouldn't have written the article in the first place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)