Deletion of Hahn Air Systems GmbH

Comment: The sources in the article are sketchy: one is promotional, one is a broken link (at least for me), and the other is a Wikipedia article. Some (useless) routine coverage is available, see https://www.reuters.com/article/us-blockchain-airlines-hahn-air-idUSKBN1XS1TC, https://www.aviationpros.com/airlines/press-release/21088069/hahn-air-hahn-air-welcomes-eight-new-airline-partners, https://www.ttrweekly.com/site/2020/06/hahn-air-signs-seven-new-airline-clients/, https://ftnnews.com/news-home/appointments/world/39304-hahn-air-appoints-alexander-proschka-frederick-nowotny-kirsten-rehmann. Looking to , these pieces (https://simpleflying.com/hahn-air-retail/ and https://www.travelweekly.com/Travel-News/Airline-News/Tiny-German-airline-Hahn-a-big-player) in industry publications could lift them over the bar. They are both independent, are written by staff writers, and rise to the level of |secondary coverage by analysing the company's business model. Naturally, I've added them to the article. I'm not saying this is a case of obvious notability but I would have expected somewhat more source analysis from the nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SECONDARY)