Deletion of Elliottism

Comment: as imaginary or insignificant or both. If you're keeping something secret, you probably shouldn't put it in an encyclopedia; if you're trying to garner publicity, Wikipedia isn't the place for it (because of, among other things, ). If few people know about it, chances are no one (or almost no one) is going to look it up in Wikipedia.&ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Wikipedia is not meant to be a primary source for information about your religion. Show us coverage of this religion from |reliable sources if you want this article to be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Yes, it is different... this article has no |reliable sources to comply with |Wikipedia's verifiability policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Very good, but a bible allegedly written on some beer mats in the local watering hole, 200 members, The "church buildings" are private residences.  and WP:-O Amen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: Obvious . Seems we get one of these every week at least. This one's no more amusing than any of the others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: Yay, the religion of the week Afd! Seriously, as with the others that are |made up in school one day, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per all above, and I will call it imaginary |until |proven |otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:CITE)

Comment: http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/6729/tedebear7mc.gif Ted E. Bear says "This page is |bollocks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)