Deletion of George Uboh

Comment: This is an article with a very colourful history: Originally this was a direct copy from the subject's personal website and flagged for deletion as copyvio. This was "remediated" by deleting the problematic contents from the subject's website and replacing it with a referrer to Wikipedia. The author of the article identified himself as paid publicist of the subject in the process - apparently with control over both the subject's personal website and attempts to influence Wikipedia. Despite a history of reminders about COI editing, the author kept introducing poorly sourced, fluffy contents about the subject, while omitting important facts. While the subject clearly has considerable media coverage in Nigerian media, I'm not entirely sure if those sources are reliable/unbiased as reporting seems to be either with a slightly negative or an overly positive slant (most of the relevant refs are linked in the article). The key claim for notability is the alleged uncovering of misppropriated funds. This may fall into .pseudonym
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)