Deletion of Future of the Bangladesh Air Force (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per  It is speculative cruft, and wishful thinking
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: as ''per'' . No redirect as ''per'' , it is not a valid search term.  Any extant plans covered in significant detail in |reliable sources can be summarized in a single short section of Bangladesh_Air_Force
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCRYSTAL||WP:NOTCRYSTAL||WP:RS)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCRYSTAL||WP:NOR)

Comment: Per nom, per above. Subject and context doesn't warrant , and can be sufficiently covered within the scope of Bangladesh_Air_Force. I also think, salting and protecting is a good idea; if in any distant future (cannot foresee happening), splitting seems necessary, an AfC should be used
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: as unsourced |fancruft. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog, and mere speculations about what might happen in the future does not belong here. Articles/lists of this kind are also almost impossible to keep encyclopaedic and focussed, since they attract fanboys trying to prove that their country is better than everybody else's country, by inflating numbers and adding ever wilder speculations about what the future might bring. -&nbsp;'''Tom'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)