Deletion of Root analogue dental implant

Comment: There's already a merge discussion and so this seems to be |forum shopping.  The main article about dental implants is 93K and so it's reasonable to consider splitting the topic for the various types.  This particular technique of making a facsimile in the shape of the original tooth seems to be the oldest one, going back thousands of years, and so is a natural and reasonable sub-topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:forum shopping)

Comment: this is not a yet another type of implant: this is a considerably different class of implants: the one not based on screws,  and the article is large. Obviously this is not an AfD subject since "root analogue" implant -wikipedia google search provides THOUSANDS of hits, with many overview articles, i.e., reliable |secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: The nominator is not asking for deletion, but for merging, about which Talk:Dental implant#Merger discussion|a discussion was started some time ago but never closed. I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Root_analogue_dental_implant&diff=878347438&oldid=878324466 made the obvious point when I contested  deletion, but https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Root_analogue_dental_implant&diff=next&oldid=878347438 the nominator's reply flew in the face of our copyright policy, which requires the original contributors to be credited with their edits rather than someone who copied the material somewhere else
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)