Deletion of Hank Hill

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: While this article is not particularly well-sourced, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22hank+hill%22&aq=f&oq=%22hank+hill%22&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&tbm=bks&q=%22hank+hill%22+%22king+of+the+hill%22+-wikipedia&oq=%22hank+hill%22+%22king+of+the+hill%22+-wikipedia&gs_l=serp.3...444039.446597.0.446783.19.16.0.0.0.7.427.2440.7j6j1j1j1.16.0.cpsugrccpqgame..0.0...1.1.5.psy-ab.AZHV7JIomaI&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&fp=57ed3facf015c21&biw=1024&bih=643 coverage in books of Hank Hill indicates that it should be possible to improve the article with respectable book sources. I may do so myself if I get a chance. Much of this article could be described as |fancruft: "Articles on episodes of television series, or fictional characters in movies are more likely to be labeled fancruft if they are primarily summaries, biographies of made-up people, or collections of trivia that relate to the continuity of a series rather than its critical or social reception." Nevertheless, this article should be tagged for improvement rather than deletion because we can edit it to focus on the critical and social reception of the character
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT)