Deletion of Eilat bakery bombing

Comment: Well, I count myself as a staunch deletionist, but  goes hand-in-hand with, and is directly descended from, . Where so many |reliable sources exist, and where key |policies are so rigidly obeyed, I really can't think of reason for deletion. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the very nucleus of much of present day international relations and I think it would be a great disservice not to document it in great detail, provided that our coverage is |objective and thoroughly |verified
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:VERIFIABILITY||WP:RS||WP:POLICY||WP:POV||WP:V)

Comment: or merge into List of terrorist incidents or other appropriate article). And I'm an inclusionist! Per , wikipedia is not the news. We don't need a hash-by-hash event of everything that happens in the Middle East
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Meets ,  and, crucially for inclusion, . In addition to the sources already cited, I was able to find http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6312657.stm this in seconds. A Google news search for "Eilat" presents plenty of others http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=en&q=eilat&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&tab=wn. Of course there have been a great many instances of bloodshed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, I don't see any reason not to maintain articles on those instances where multiple independent |reliable sources exist. #PAPER|Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopaedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOT)