Deletion of The Lee Nysted Experience

Comment: The only possible criterion of  this subject could meet is ''Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such.''  Lee Nysted has used as studio musicians two drummers who are certainly notable, but is a studio musician in a band if he is a hired hand who does not otherwise tour or write music for the band (and according to the article, Lee writes his own music
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: per the answer to my question above.  The drummers are just hired hands and not "members" of the band for purposes of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: to Huntress829: Reviews are, in fact, central to the establishment of an artist's |notability. So are interviews and features. The existence of "hundreds" of reviews found via Google (an undetermined number being by the same person) is irrelevant, as none presented so far have been in |credible, independent third-party sources. '''None.''' We are not making this a central issue because we don't like Mr. Nysted, we already have this as a central issue by longstanding consensus and confirmed policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: because I cannot find anything out there that is not either trivial or emanating fomr the subject (a press release or whatever).  Impassioned defence by involved parties is noted but unpersuasive: |conflict of interest means you should be a bit less aggressive.  Attacking other editors will get you precisely one thing: blocked from editing.  My condolences to whoever has to close this mess
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Bill Smith, you cannot argue that we should include information '''precisely because''' it cannot be proven false. That is a blatant violation of , a core policy of Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: blatant promotion, fails  and , no reason to think this lot are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: this silly  exercise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)

Comment: as still no assertion of notability, failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: please do feel free to add references and reviews. Kindly ensure that these are |reliable, just only a small handfull of high-quality reviews, such as from Q magazine, Mojo etc. Reviews posted by individuals on sites such as Amazon fail this test. You should, however, bear in mind  and refrain from overlinking. The debate on Grammy nominations is moot, as nominations do not count for squat here:  states: "''Has won a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno or Mercury Music Award''": "nomination" does not equal "win". Also, it's a big stretch to call a session musician a band member, as there is no permanence at all, and certainly no sharing of royalties. Steve Gadd and Jeff Porcaro played on tens of thousands of tracks, and so that stretched (and fallacious) logic would enable every one of those artists who recorded with them "notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:POINT||WP:MUSIC)