Deletion of Ayumi Shinoda

Comment: Fails  and the . No real assertion of notability. Claimed awards are given by a broadcaster to promote its own programming, and therefore fail the well-known/significant test. Moreover, the "mature actress"/MILF category by consensus general fails that standard, regardless of the awardgiver; while the other award is so lacking in significance that there appears to be no RS documentation of the award's selection criteria, even in the native-language sources which document its mere existence. No biographical content. No reliable sourcing beyond databases; other source is promotional award announcement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: The subject lacks a strong notability claim and reliable source coverage. However, the nominator's "people here don't watch Japanese TV" rationale invokes the very systemic bias they are protesting at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination). Please read . As for the topic at hand, editor consensus at recent AfD debates holds that the Adult Broadcasting Award is not sufficiently significant or well-known to satisfy WP:PORNBIO
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)