Deletion of Bike or Die!

Comment: I agree with User:Pinchies that in this case the original version of the game and version 2 constitute the same subject. Apart from the IGN review of v2 mentioned by Lee Vilenski above, the article includes a couple of reviews https://web.archive.org/web/20171108041123/http://www.mobiletechreview.com/games/Bike_or_Die.htmhttps://the-gadgeteer.com/2008/04/24/toyspring_s_bike_or_die_palm_os_game/ that I think count as RS. So plausibly passes , even if not by much
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Bike or Die 1 and Bike or Die 2 cannot be the same subject, nor do I understand why the article is referring to them as versions as they are greatly different from each other, instead of original and sequel (in fact the very same source from the article says BOD 2 is a sequel http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/7620/bike-or-die-2-released/). The article right now is in a  violation, mostly being positive and trying to make it like it was ultra popular. Most of the sources are app listing pages, or primary ones. Touch Arcade is a  article of a game release, and doesn't cover the game indepth. {{u|Nsk92}}, MobileTechReview is an unreliable source, reviewed by "TerpKristin" username doesn't give much hope and there is no staff or editorial policy. The Gadgeteer is also a blog per https://www.hellotech.com/blog/unplugged-the-gadgeteer/. None are 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ROUTINE||WP:RS)

Comment: I'm sensing that my enthusiasm for this game existence not being lost to the sands of time is an undeniable bias - one that I acknowledge. As for a promo team?? The game is effectively dead. I tried to contact the game's creator to ask if they were aware of any other reviews of the game - they were unreachable. The iPhone version of the game is no longer playable as it was withdrawn by Apple due to a lack of updates over time. The game's online community is also effectively dead as a result. There is however an active community at the moment trying to archive much of the history and software available for the Palm platform, and this game was one that was significant enough to many people that I feel if lost would leave the history of this platform incomplete. That's my motivation towards keeping that game. My experience and the word of a few others is not encyclopedic, hence I'm doing the best I can do draw upon the resources available to help this article stand some more rigor. This was my 2nd ever article that I have invested time into, so I'm sure there's a lot I'm going to take away from this experience about how to follow the process better for next time. I'm certainly not trying to waste your time, so I'm sorry you feel that way. Regarding bike or die 1 vs 2, perhaps that's semantics, regardless, I can see that you and I won't reach agreement on that topic. I don't especially care about the bike or die 2 game, it didn't seem to achieve a relative level of success that would earn it a wikipedia page, but it happens that the iPhone platform was orders of magnitude larger than the Palm os platform, so more  are available for that version. I only see value in keeping it there for completeness, and I don't see significant harm in keeping it or removing that section either way. I would like to hear from you especially, have I added sufficient  to this game that you have changed your mind about the game failing ? I hope I have made my position clear. I appreciate that people have generally   with my comments
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:AGF)