Deletion of El kondor pada

Comment: The listed criteria for the song notability are now http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/El_kondor_pada discussed in detail on the article talk page too, as well as on this page. It is clear that '''http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music/Notability_and_Music_Guidelines/Songs according to the proposed guideline the song is notable''', and that the claims on which this depends are now either fully referenced or can be verified by emailing radio stations like b92, the indexovci themselves etc. Numerous Serbian, and also Croatian, Slovenian wikipedians, and even some from abroad have testified on the main deletion page that this is indeed the case (i.e. confirmed the claims from which notability follows), and so, according to , it should be enough for AfD (means for verifying are available; all claims are verifiable in principle, by checking broadcast etc. with the stations and it is undue burden to require all the e-mail confirmations and non-online references, that these users claim to exist, in short time for the purpose of this AfD; verifiability should be matter of principle, not actual scanning of books and obtaining other proofs about that, but allownig enough information for anyone to check; besides, there are tags to be placed if notability has yet to be demonstrated, deletion is wrong - since, by  a word that it can be done should do for the purposes of AfD - discarding the claims of '''all''' the people who heard about the song or are from relavant area, spreading few countries (that were even warring against each other) that listen to songs in Serbian, is really violating  in my opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:AGF||WP:AGF)

Comment: Notifiability and Verifiability do not have the same standards. Per , the content of an article must be verifiable: "Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources". Per , "a topic has notability if it is known outside of a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact". However, note that there is no requirement that ''the notability'' of a topic has to be verifiable in the sense of ''already been published by reliable and reputable sources''. That's the standard we often use for both, but I think this is one of the few exceptions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)