Deletion of Corruption and state capture in the telecommunications sector in transition countries

Comment: what is worth merging, has sources or can be salvaged in some way, and dispose of the rest. Once the  and essay-like parts have been excised from the article, not much will be left in it in any case
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This is a case of  IMO (also per ). A merge to corruption or a related article would require massive work akin to a total rewrite, even if there is some usable content hidden in there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: I agree that the article {{tq|lacks sufficient context clarifying what its topic is}} which makes it difficult to evaluate or improve. But I don't think this is not a valid reason for deletion. A case for deletion could be made under  with sufficient analysis of the sources. Of the existing sources, it seems like the Wayne Law Review article is the only one that directly addresses the topic; the rest either address corruption generally or are news articles on specific events. I am not qualified to perform a search for more sources in this domain; the onus kinda falls on the nominator to carry out  part D.  Alternatively, it could be argued this is a spin-out of the main Corruption article. In that case, the lack of context would probably suffice to merge
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)