Deletion of Honestbee (2nd nomination)

Comment: the company |has gotten sustained press, bad and good
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Meets  per coverage in bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, reliable sources. Concerns with promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes --though mostly in the form of negative covg.Also per NA1000.The TOU violations are shady zones though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the above sources fail ; the only truly independent sources that I was able to find discuss the company's labor practices (misleading advertising to potential contractors). This does not rise to the level of encyclopedia notability. Received $15M in funding, which is small for venture-backed tech companies.  The article was created by Special:Contributions/Karentho who is currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts. The article was also extensively edited by an account bearing the company's name; also indef blocked as socks. See also: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Honestbee/Archive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)