Deletion of HQ9+ (3rd nomination)

Comment: no indication of notability. Votes for keep in '07 centered around the fact that 'people were talking about it'. People aren't talking about it anymore, and I can find no sources to indicate passing . Suggest perhaps |salting as  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&page=HQ9%2B has been deleted multiple times in the past, this is the fourth time the article has been taken to Afd and consensus has been reached to delete (also discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatnik programming language). There's no indication it will become notable in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SALT)

Comment: While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ9+ (2nd nomination)|previously discussed at AfD and the result was Delete arguments are stronger, and there is no double jeapordy in Wiki. An article which is notable will survive all reasonable XfD's
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)