Deletion of Edward Snowden

Comment: per Erik: simply does not meet  criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Notable and likely to remain so.   does not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . This seems to happen every time a huge event occurs, que ridiculo. Just like when Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev|the Tsarnaev brothers article was AfD'd unsuccessfully and the nominator cited BLP1E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: as the subject does not meet  that was cited by the AFD nominator. 1) At present the subject is regarded as a high profile individual with regard to the leak about the PRISM (surveillance program). 2) The individual's role in the leak is substantial and well-documented
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: because Snowden does not meet two of the three conditions at . While it is a single event, he is not likely to remain a low-profile individual, and his role in the leak is definitely substantial and well-documented
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)