Deletion of Max Ehrich

Comment:  is the governing inclusion criteria. If it can be seen that Max has enough significant coverage to pass , any perceived failure to meet  does not matter.  So my initial search found http://www.theinsider.com/news/967246_WE_HATE_VANESS_HUDGENS._HER_AND_HER_SONGS The Insider, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/fashion/27camp.html?ref=arts New York Times, and http://www.livinginmedia.com/article/max_ehrich_pursuing_his_passion.html Living Media?. Tough call for such a short career, but I'd rather err on the side of caution in this instance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ENT)

Comment:  is met by http://newstranscript.gmnews.com/news/2008/1029/front_page/036.html these http://www.livinginmedia.com/article/max_ehrich_pursuing_his_passion.html two in-depth articles about him. Whether or not he passes  is irrelevant because the fact that he passes  means that he should have an article on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:BIO)

Comment: One starring role in a film, one recurring role in a network TV show, reported by the New York Times as a "principal dancer" in another film. That meets the "multiple" requirement of  for me. An inch over the line is as good as a mile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)