Deletion of Princess Olufemi-Kayode

Comment: I can find a dozen or so news stories quoting her, but none with the in-depth coverage about her required of . The Ashoka Fellowship profile could plausibly be taken as one such source, but we need multiple of them. And she definitely does not pass ; it's not the right kind of fellowship for that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: No pass of rof. Not sure about . I can't see  that she is a Fellow of the Royal Society
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject passes   and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per observations already made above by DGG, David, et al. The usual social justice warriors are here with their raft of keeps based on websites, pamphlets, and other ephemeral claims ("this article should be kept as a way of supporting the advocacy for the increase of women related articles on Wikipedia"). There are a few mentions in solid secondary sources, but they're trivial. I presume the flashmob of keeps will prevail, tallying this as one more article towards WP becoming nothing more than a |biographical directory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: Does not pass either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPROF)

Comment: i wish to add further that this article should be kept as a way of supporting the advocacy for the increase of women related articles on Wikipedia. More so, this article strongly passed the general criteria for notability  see my points below
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)