Deletion of Informedconsent.co.uk

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: no evidence from multiple, nontrivial |reliable sources that site meets . As for the keep recommender's assertion ''they don't say a lot about the site, but there's not really a lot to say''... well, then the article does not belong on Wikipedia.  a primary or secondary source of information, it is an encyclopedia, which is a tertiary source. I can understand the assertion that the article was created solely as a last-ditch effort to save Wipipedia; that ship has sailed, so without any evidence as to notability, this one should join as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:NOT)

Comment: Red Pepper (magazine) is a notable left-wing political magazine.  OutNorthwest is a popular regional magazine for the LGBT community in its region.  Just because you've never heard of a source doesn't make it unimportant.  Yes, there isn't much coverage, but I challenge you to find ''any'' coverage that is more in-depth than any of these (the OutNorthwest article is the most in-depth, containing (IIRC) an entire paragraph on the subject) in a reliable source on a BDSM-related web site.  I contend that this level of coverage is what one would expect of such an entity, therefore this site is a leader in its field, hence notable.  I would also point out that the Channel4 content is not merely a directory entry; if it were a directory they would surely have more than two sites on the particular topic.  I'd contend that the page is intended to form a guide to recommended resources (i.e. recommending only the best) rather than a directory (i.e. aiming to include everything that's relevant).  The reason  excludes directories is because of this lack of selectivity.  The Channel4 page shows evidence of selectivity in its creation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per  and my comments about this article in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wipipedia (third nomination)|Wipipedia's thrid AFD nomination. This article seems to have been created solely to save Wipipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: all of the sources are trivial mentions. All but one source is not-notable. The source that is notable (Channel4) is simply a directory entry, which  explicitly excludes. Below is the total extent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: source mentions are trivial. No indication that the site is notable or that enough source material exists for a comprehensive article based on |reliable sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)