Deletion of Hydrogen fuel injection

Comment: Talks given in meetings generally do not make a case for notability.  At the least they normally are not independent secondary sources.  The journal presented is not one that I have ever heard of before and therefore am loathe to consider it a |reliable source.  It's focus on hydrogen technology also limits the journal's ability to establish notability in a wider context.  Finally, none of the titles present use the phrase "hydrogen fuel injection".  Overall, this is so unimpressive to me that I have changed my opinion above from a weak delete to just plain delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This seems to be a case of .  I am willing to change my opinion, but only with evidence that this is a topic that others have taken some serious note of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)