Deletion of Controversial cases involving sex offenses

Comment: Using Wikipedia to draw attention to two people who are ''not'' specifically noteworthy otherwise is against the spirit of .  I ''could'' imagine a legal article on Wikipedia which did not focus on the named individuals, but on the ''legal arguments'' about the broadness of the "sex offender" definitions - but such an article would ''not'' need to name people.  There are, in fact, a lot of legal discussions which sould be the basis of a legitimate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: to Sex offender registration#Effectiveness and consequences - these individuals aren't notable, this list isn't notable enough for a stand-alone article per , and no list of this type (regardless of name) can be created that won't generate controversy. The section that I recommend merging to could use some expansion that help demonstrate issues with automatic mandatory registry
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: This is a fake biography—there is no record of birth date or place, occupation, or achievements. The article and each of its 8 references make it totally clear that the person is ''not'' |notable—he is known only for |one event. The fact that a particular individual fell foul of a legal quandary is gossip, and not of encyclopedic interest. What ''is'' encyclopedic is the fact that certain laws lead to controversial results, and there should be an article on that topic which may well mention this ''incident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ONEEVENT)