Deletion of Blue Lives Matter

Comment: clearly passes : https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/act-four/wp/2016/01/14/shades-of-blue-looks-at-the-dark-side-of-blue-lives-matter/ WaPo, http://www.qconline.com/life/south_of_20/blue-lives-matter-raises-support-and-concerns/article_c4ea9503-36d3-5ecf-b339-5a79237c786c.html Quad Cities, http://www.palmcoastobserver.com/photo-gallery/blue-lives-matter-local-police-boycott-quentin-tarantino Palm Coast Observer, http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/another-black-lives-matter-rebuttal-stirs-controversy MSNBC, http://nypost.com/2015/10/21/blue-lives-matter-a-call-from-the-mother-of-slain-cop-brian-moore/ New York Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/yankees-blue-lives-matter_55c8b185e4b0923c12bd62d2 HuffPo, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/10/10/blue-lives-matter-billboards-spark-controversy/73728520/ USA Today, and http://ktla.com/2015/09/27/police-supporters-hold-blue-lives-matter-rally-in-hollywod/ KTLA. And that was just on the first two pages of a News search. {{u|Spirit of Eagle}}'s point about a unified article is also spot on, imho
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as an organization it appears to lack notability, as a phrase it appears to fall foul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)