Deletion of Eurocomb

Comment: to European Prize in Combinatorics. Eurocomb gets 772 hits on GScholar and ''"Eurocomb" -wikipedia'' gets 247 hits in GBooks, so the papers at Eurocomb do get some coverage. The conference has special issues devoted to it in the European Journal of Combinatorics, for example, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1196034&picked=prox Eurocomb'03 and http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01956698/33/5 EuroComb '09. The European Journal of Combinatorics is a peer reviewed journal and notable in itself. So the conference series as a whole has coverage in multiple reliable sources. If you think that the European Journal of Combinatorics is sufficiently independent of Eurocomb, (it looks that way to me) then this is sufficient for the topic to pass notability thresholds per . If not, per  and -M, basic facts about the conference are certainly verifiable and merging of verifiable information is preferred over deletion; the European Prize in Combinatorics, which is awarded at Eurocomb, seems the best target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)