Deletion of List of songs about California (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nominator. Also per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: I already made two comments above but declared myself undecided on a vote. After reading the reasoning in everyone else's votes, I find the "delete" votes backed up by the  and  standards to be much more convincing, as opposed to those who think the article should be kept just for |bureaucratic reasons involving page stats and category titles. My vote is now to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:BURO)

Comment: per discussion at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_songs_about_California previous nomination. The article passes  and while it could use some discussion about restricting the scope (as suggested in the closing of the previous AfD) and better sourcing that's not a reason to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: but restrict to notable songs. https://www.billboard.com/photos/7386019/best-songs-about-california "15 Best Songs About California" (''Billboard''), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/06/us/california-music-playlist-spotify.html "What's Your Favorite California Song?" (''New York Times''), https://www.buzzfeed.com/mackenziekruvant/songs-for-a-california-state-of-mind "27 Songs For A California State Of Mind" (BuzzFeed), etc. satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: What this page needs is for someone to be |bold and expand this list. Clarityfiend has identified above that this page ''should'', in theory, pass NLIST, but there's been no effort put into in the first place. All of the unsourced/poorly sourced entries should be removed, and this page should be watched heavily if kept. I have https://web.archive.org/web/20210602073758/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_songs_about_California archived the page if anyone needs anything in this for future reference (in the event this page is deleted). I will change my vote if vast improvements are made
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: I find the keep rationales above, although less numerous, to be more compelling. Clarityfiend presented clear evidence that the topic of songs about California {{tq|has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources}}, thus meeting , therefore keep. The primary deletion rationale, that the list is prone to accruing cruft, is uncompelling, as |deletion is not cleanup; we can always fight cruft by removing it. I find the delete rationale that the list is  to be uncompelling, as this is List of songs about California, not List of songs with California in the title, and indeed plenty of entries don't mention California in their title. I also find the argument that the category is sufficient uncompelling, since  is a well-established guideline, and a list page can provide benefits to readers (such as including band names) that our current category system cannot. &#123;{u&#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:DINC||WP:SHAREDNAME||WP:NOTDUPE)

Comment: This has already been discussed here and the result was '''keep'''.  This fresh nomination is not policy-based and clearly doesn't pass .  Per , "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''"  "California Dreamin'|All the leaves are brown
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:DELAFD)

Comment: I was honestly on the fence about this one. I was initially going to vote keep as there are sources that discuss California songs as a group (and that would seemingly satisfy ), but I was convinced by Richhoncho's above comments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: Meets  per above arguments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)