Deletion of Yisroel Dovid Weiss

Comment: The subject appears to meet |notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Agree that this individual is |notable under a fair reading of  and notability is clearly backed by adequate |attribution. Whether or not what he says is true or good or beautiful is completely irrelevant to his notability. End of story
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:A)

Comment: A thorough, well-researched and balanced article that uses |reliable and |verifiable sources to demonstrate notability per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: Thank you image:smile.gif. I am putting work in, for as long as it is in wiki, it is a Bio, and must have extra care taken per , but really do not think HE is notable. The article is 95% about the visit, not the person, so that is a failure of notability for the person, in my opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: to new article: People identified with Neturei Karta similar to '''Russian space dogs''' and '''Monkeys in space''' because this guy is |not notable in and of himself. (The dogs and monkeys had as much to do with the Russian space program as Mr. Weiss has to do with his "adopted" cause. See also: '''Animals in space
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: and opposing suggestion to merge.  From a strictly policy point, he meets .  Sure, the information about the meeting is disproportionate to the rest of the article, but that's just a reason to expand other sections of the article.  The sources are about him directly or feature him prominently (even if in relation to the meeting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The primary criterion for notability, per , is "A topic is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, independent of the subject and independent of each other." In  '''TOPIC''' referes to the PERSON. In this article, all of the notability is in reference to the EVENT. As I said when I nominated this for deletion, the EVENT may well be, and in my opinion, IS notable. But NOT Mr. Weiss. None of these sources are about HIM outside of the EVENT. It really is not that difficult of a differentiation, in my opinion. What about it do you find incorrect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Ignoring the fact that you are comparing this man to animals, it's not an adequate analogy. He has had coverage that focused on him alone. That qualifies him for passing 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)