Deletion of Bryce Beverlin II

Comment: although I would reconsider if any of the musical/film works were |verifiably important.  As it stands, it is strictly vanity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: vanity.  Re: quercus robur's comment, if a third party had contributed this article, it would mean that there was ''less'' of a problem, because someone else would have taken notice of him and wouldn't be writing from |personal experience
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: specifically ''We assume, however, that someone is an expert not only because of their personal and direct knowledge of a topic, but because of their knowledge of published sources on a topic. This policy prohibits expert editors from drawing on their personal and direct knowledge if such knowledge is unverifiable. ''  trumps all, except possibly , but that's the usual frame of things around here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:IAR)