Deletion of PernixData (2nd nomination)

Comment: I bow to no one in my frustration with the pervasive corporate spam and self promotional articles on Wikipedia, but this one clearly passes . With all due respect to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The article needs clean-up, not deletion.  I've seen this argument before, and I reject it.  Trade publications are a perfectly acceptable source.  The |general notability guideline is quite explicit in its requirements, and there's nothing in it about TechCrunch's disqualification as a source of notability for tech-related topics.  If the article sucks, then slap it with a badge of shame, contact the relevant WikiProject for assistance, and/or |fix it yourself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: Passes . Source examples include: http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2013/02/20/pernixdata-aims-to-break-virtualization-and-storage-bottleneck/, http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/14/pernixdata-raises-20m-in-oversubscribed-round-for-new-way-to-think-about-storage/, http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9241357/Startup_PernixData_virtualizes_server_based_flash, http://www.crn.com/news/storage/240159476/pernixdata-fvp-clusters-server-flash-to-add-performance-in-virtualized-environments.htm
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)