Deletion of Pakistan Murdabad (3rd nomination)

Comment: it's a notable slogan.  - "Notability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." As a side note, |Why didn't you pay heed to what others are saying? I agree with DS in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:IDHT)

Comment: or merge into Anti-Pakistan sentiment)  - Per .  I read the entire article, and I just don't see sources analyzing the phrase ''as a phrase'' in any significant way.   The article is a collection of uses of the phrase, which is precisely what Wiktionary is intended for.   I'm not suggesting that all the information be deleted from WP entirely:  much of it could go into  Anti-Pakistan sentiment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICDEF)

Comment: Meets  and ; a similar article, Pakistan Zindabad, has been kept. The phrase's negative connotations are insufficient reason to delete, although a merge to Anti-Pakistan sentiment would be a compromise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Again. And I'm more or less literally repeating my vote from the first and second times round. What is "notable" here is not the slogan as such, but the various incidents of conflict in which it was used (and about which we obviously have separate articles). The existence of the slogan as such is a trivial fact of the Hindi language – just as in English you can create a "down with X" slogan about anything you hate, and a "long live Y" slogan about anything you support. The fact that people use such slogans about various issues and at various occasions doesn't render these stereotyped slogans themselves notable, separately from the notability of the political issue each of them represents. The article still consists solely of an enumeration of separate and unconnected cases where people are reported to have used this slogan. None of the lengthy literal quotations on the page is actually about the slogan; they are about the violence and merely mention the slogan in that connection. As such, the article is a paradigm case of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK)