Deletion of List of states with language politics (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article has been tagged for  and  violations since August 2006.  One shouldn't first turn to AfD to solve verifiabiliy and original research problems, but deletion is an appropriate measure when the nature and history of an article show that it is unlikely to ever comply with  and .  It is an  list that practically invites  problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per /. For example the Norwegian section do not mention Riksmål (and it's a problematic area
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: This list has a |snowball's chance in hell of being encyclopedic.  Virtually every state has a political issue, or has the potential for political issues, over the language used in that state.  Specific issues of specific states may deserve their own articles, and then this can be made into a category, but as a list it is impossible to maintain as accurate, verifiable and encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: for irremediable  problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)