Deletion of Council on the Ageing

Comment: Not sure how much  was done here.  Sorry, but I was probably a bit obtuse at Talk:Council on the Ageing.  Another simple example, if you google ("Council on the Ageing" .gov.au), then all of the .gov.au site hits are secondary, ie, the content has had review by people not associated with the subject here.  Yes, many of the hits in the gross search result are trivial, but there are a solid number that are not.  There is also the TROVE search I gave at "Talk:Council on the Ageing".  Again the bulk of that search result is not IRS about the subject, but there are a solid number that are.  I am of the view that each state branch (note ''state'', not a "local"), probably does not warrant its own article, but as a multibranch national entity it seems to me to be quite notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: though the naming should be Council of the Ageing(NSW) or something similar as there is a national level body, and COTA bodies in every state. https://trove.nla.gov.au/result?q=%22Council+of+the+Aging%22 On Trove I found a significant volume sources including some that indicate the COTA is a publisher, research organisation, registered charity, and a primary source of knowledge. It meets  the organisation and its work is well documented
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)