Deletion of WPPJ (2nd nomination)

Comment: http://media.www.pointparkglobe.com/media/storage/paper1255/news/2008/03/13/WebExtras/Local.Hip.Hop.Artist.Interviewed.At.Radio.Station-3268284.shtml is about the artist, not the station, inclusion in a list like http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/living/tv/broadcast/ establishes existence but not necessarily notability, the remaining articles from the campus newspaper.  I'm still not convinced that a small student newspaper is the kind of significant coverage  is looking for.   requires "Significant coverage" which cover the subject "directly in detail".  There is a natural bias towards things which involve students of that college which brings the independence of the student newspaper into question for purposes of establishing notability.  It's not that student newspapers are bad sources.  They make a great resource for citations but a poor one for establishing notability.  Has this station been the subject of an article or received any coverage in any other media (books, TV interview with the station manager, etc.) anywhere off campus
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: as it straddles the line for . If this were licensed, it would be worthy of a standalone article; if there were more coverage by |independent reliable sources, it would also be similarly worthy... but lacking both, the material should be incorporated into the article about the university
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: That move would violate 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NAME)