Deletion of FuelCell Energy (2nd nomination)

Comment: In the past, Cunard has located good analyst reports. But the ones above are not "analyst reports" but comments on stock price. An analyst report provides in-depth analysis on the company. Also, the links to the articles above are not intellectually independent as per . Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: That a company is a micro-cap with revenues of $185 million does not mean that "it's too insignificant to have generated significant coverage". From Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#No inherent notability: smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as individuals can be notable.  Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations or their products, though articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable per . This company has received significant coverage in analyst reports.Here is even more coverage:{{cite news |last=Eisler |first=Matthew N. |date=2018-05-29 |title=Fuel Cells Finally Find a Killer App: Carbon Capture   |url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/fuel-cells/fuel-cells-finally-find-a-killer-app-carbon-capture |newspaper=IEEE Spectrum |accessdate=2018-08-12 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/71baZZYjE |archivedate=2018-08-12 }}This is an extensive profile of FuelCell Energy.The article notes: One of the salient facts about advanced power sources is that new products typically take decades to enter the marketplace. As more than one observer has noted, there is no Moore’s Law for batteries. Sustained government support is thus crucial. With help from the U.S. Department of Energy, FuelCell Energy was able to focus on the thankless task of improving the efficiency, cost, and durability of its molten carbonate fuel cells. After years of research and development, the company demonstrated a 2-megawatt plant in Santa Clara, Calif., which operated from 1996 to 1997. In 2003, FuelCell Energy shipped its first commercial unit. To date, it has installed several hundred megawatts of capacity in 50 locations around the world, most notably a 59-MW combined heat-and-power plant in South Korea. Today, the company is the leading provider of molten carbonate technology....The energy crisis and environmental movement of the 1970s brought renewed interest in all kinds of clean power, including the carbonate fuel cell. It was in this ferment that FuelCell Energy, then known as Energy Research Corp., was founded. “What we thought made the most sense was a power generation system that could run on pipeline-volume natural gas, and high-temperature fuel cells like carbonate did that,” Leo says.{{cite news |last=Wald |first=Matthew L. |date=2014-12-14 |title=Capturing Carbon as a Byproduct of Running a Fuel Cell |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/15/business/capturing-carbon-as-a-byproduct-of-running-a-fuel-cell.html |newspaper=The New York Times |accessdate=2018-08-12 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/71ba5OrnS |archivedate=2018-08-12 }}The article notes: As fuel cell is piped between the stages, the gas is at 70 percent purity, and most of the other 30 percent is innocuous steam. So the engineers at the company that built the installation, FuelCell Energy, are pulling off a chemical bait-and-switch....In FuelCell’s design, a coal plant adds a fuel cell unit next to its smokestack, and the fuel cell soaks up the carbon dioxide and adds power to overall output. Some energy is used — the demonstration unit here would produce eight kilowatts, enough for a midsize commercial air-conditioner, but in carbon capture mode makes only about six kilowatts — but the loss is more manageable than drawing energy from the coal plant for conventional carbon capture.And if the Environmental Protection Agency follows through on its intent to require existing coal plants to shrink their carbon output, the company’s fuel cells could do the job in two ways, by capturing some carbon and by raising the electricity output over which the remaining carbon dioxide is spread....FuelCell energy is not alone in looking for a more energy-efficient way to grab carbon dioxide; other ideas are percolating.{{cite news |last=Schwartz |first=John |date=2016-05-05 |title=Exxon Mobil Backs FuelCell Effort to Advance Carbon Capture Technology |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/science/exxon-mobil-backs-fuelcell-effort-to-advance-carbon-capture-technology.html |newspaper=The New York Times |accessdate=2018-08-12 |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/71baJcyLW |archivedate=2018-08-12 }}The article notes: For years, FuelCell Energy has been considered a company to watch. Its technology promised to help economically reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, which could help combat climate change. The Danbury, Conn., company might be able to make a difference, experts said, if only it had a partner with really deep pockets.Now it has one.In an agreement announced on Thursday, Exxon Mobil said it had tightened an existing relationship with FuelCell in hopes of taking the technology from the lab to the market....FuelCell Energy’s products can also strip 70 percent of the smog-producing oxides of nitrogen from the exhaust of coal-burning power plants
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: Re-creation shortly after an AfD deletion without a review process (, ) is to be discouraged, but it is appropriate to reconsider this article here given the 4 years that have passed. The company in question continues to go about its business, as seen in the text and GreenTechMedia reference that I have added. However, while that GreenTechMedia article does show independence, for example in sceptical assessment of claims of profitability being just around the corner, I am not seeing enough to demonstrate attained  notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (:WP:DRV||:WP:AFC||:WP:NCORP)