Deletion of Emily Austin Perry

Comment: I can't tell you how much I hate this challenge, but I'll try. This is the second worst of the year, following the challenge of Polyester... ONE: This is a historical figure, not a contemporary BLP of somebody on the make. This is worthy of note from the outset — a pre-internet figure. TWO: This is not a few throwaway lines, this is a serious piece of work, and well-footnoted. This also is worthy of note before the challenge ever should have been launched. THREE: There are multiple, independent, substantial published sources showing in the piece. FN1 is currently 404 on the net, but it is presumed to exist. That's the Sherman-Denison TX Herald-Democrat. FN2 is the Austin College magazine. That's TWO good sources.  FN28 is a university press BIOGRAPHY of the subject. We're done!!! Jesus, how about a little common sense and at least a modest attention to ?!?!? A big, fat, slimy trout for this nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)