Deletion of PNY Technologies

Comment: the company passes . Source examples: http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/pny_partners_asetek_ship_liquid_cooled_videocards, http://www.northjersey.com/news/83991357_Christie_calls_CEOs_to_drum_up_business.html?page=all, http://parsippany.patch.com/groups/business-news/p/lt-gov-declares-parsippanys-pny-technologies-good-new1f7c94d51d, http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/nets/2009/09/nets-sell-practice-jersey-rights-to-pny, http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9858378-39.html, http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10031329-1.html. Please note that per , topic notability is based upon the ''availability'' of sources, rather than whether or not they're present in Wikipedia articles. However
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NRVE)

Comment: now passes  and  which requires actual inline cites in order to prevent deletion. '''Delete''' - Has no RS refs showing notability.  Will change to keep if the article reaches . As I have been forced to do numerous times, saving an article like this means doing the required work. Personally, I think this shows a major flaw with AfDs. That is, this company is obviously notable but instead of being fixed with a little work, its article was AfDed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BURDEN||WP:GNG)

Comment: No sources have been added to support this passing . Ping me if this changes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)