Deletion of Caitlin Forsyth

Comment: per  (or rather, lack thereof). Zero gnews hits, only a few ghits and none of them seem to apply to her, and many redlinks in the article. She may become notable later...when independent, reliable sources determine so, then an article would be appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Because the article does not include |citations from |reliable sources, it does not appear to be in compliance with the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: No references to indicate notability. The achievements mentioned, even if verified, are insifficient to pass . GoogleNews returns 11 hits but they all appear to be about another person with the same name in the U.S.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Caitlin+Forsyth%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per cogent information given by {{user|Nsk92}}, not to mention that the entire article is unsourced .  No significant coverage in secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)