Deletion of Duane A. Sikes

Comment: The sources provided in the article could not really be considered "significant coverage" of the subject. The first is a promo page for one of the works for which he was Executive Producer. There's no real way it could be considered independent of the subject. The second only mentions him once in passing. There's not real way it could be considered "coverage" of the subject. The third isn't really focussed on the subject but does give some explanation for his involvement. It could possibly be considered "marginal" coverage of the subject; certainly not "significant". I understand the author is working on the article and there is an element of ''Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built'' involved. Perhaps the author could start by listing the reliable, independent sources on which he/she plans to build a future article. If none exist, then I struggle to see how an article on this subject will ever meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a tough one. I can see Stalwart's point, but based on a review of the article and the links I have to say that this article does indeed meet . A history of the page shows that a member of AfC upon declining the article for a source violation stated that this person is notable, but needed more sources. I come to this conclusion because of the nature of the article and the author's statement that they will be improving it in the near future. There are many articles that bring this same argument to the table, but I believe this one meets Wikipedia's requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)