Deletion of London Buses route 68

Comment: Not every trivial thing that exists in a directory needs a stand alone article. See |not a directory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Oops, missed this one. Essentially per BrownHairedGirl. |GNG is an important guideline and shouldn't discarded lightly.  It is important for good reason.  Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it is usually impossible to have an encyclopaedic article about a subject that is properly verified.  These bus route articles are a case in point: they are littered with original research and for all we know could be totally inaccurate.  The reason they are littered with original research is because the reliable sources aren't there.  For that reason, the original research is fatal and unsalvageable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: because Wikipedia is |not a directory. This article fails to establish the notability of the subject. Like Crossmr, I am hesitant to place much weight on Colonel Warden's sources without being able to see the text because I have known that user to frequently present passing mentions as substantial coverage. I am also not very impressed with the procedural obstructionism of some of the early keep !votes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)