Deletion of Stephen Juba Park

Comment: WP:NGEO doesn't specifically mention parks, but I suppose it would fall under , Artificial geographical features - the guideline says that artificial geographical features are presumed to be notable if they have been officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level - while the park has a Manitoba Heritage Council plaque recognizing the Winnipeg Aqueduct, the park itself does not have national heritage protected status - there doesn't seem to be significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources that deal with the park itself, more about events that took place in Winnipeg - perhaps the article could be Merged with Winnipeg, adding information about the https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winnipeg-overdose-memorial-garden-1.5171722 memorial garden which is quite moving
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: Found this https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/archives/1984/01/1984-01-06-downtown_riverbank_park_is_nearing_completion.pdf. Not sure if  or not. Currently I am undecided, because the coverage seems extremely local, and only the Winnipeg Free Press ones (for  purposes, they all count just as a one source as "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.") so I am leaning to Delete. A lot of the coverage found is about the events in the park, but notability is 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Parks can certainly be notable if they're |reliably sourced well enough to clear , but are not automatically deemed "inherently" notable just because they exist — but two of the five footnotes here are |primary source content from the city's own self-published website, which are not notability-supporting sources; one is just a brief profile on the self-published website of the Manitoba Historical Society, calling it a historic site but failing to verify that it has any formal legal ''designation'' as such; one glancingly mentions the park's existence in a case study on the architectural redevelopment of a large neighbourhood, but is not ''about'' the park; and the only one that is about the park in any non-trivial way is not ''enough'' to hand it an instant GNG pass all by itself if it's the ''only'' substantive reliable source in play. City parks need more than just being technically verifiable as existing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: Passes . The park appears to be covered regularly in the Press, as it is host to major community events, concerts, artwork, historical monuments, plaques, festivals, etc. Here are more sources that could be used to source info about things in the park: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winnipeg-overdose-memorial-garden-1.5171722, https://winnipegsun.com/news/local-news/nuit-blanche-spreads-out-for-10th-contemporary-art-celebration, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/1919-strike-winnipeg-project-bookmark-danny-schur-1.5257870, https://www.chrisd.ca/2019/06/27/canada-day-events-winnipeg-2019/, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/2019-winnipeg-fringe-festival-comedies-2-1.5207214, The park is also used as a scene in this novel, https://books.google.com/books?id=C_33CAAAQBAJ&pg=PT144&dq=%22Stephen+Juba+Park%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiJ3cWytfHkAhUHsJ4KHfCECSIQ6AEwAHoECAQQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Stephen%20Juba%20Park%22&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)