Deletion of Alison Green

Comment: Does not seem to satisfy our threshold of |notability. The article's subject apparently relies on trivial mentions in journals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I do not find other people's arguments to delete valid or compelling--the article being unsourced is ''not'' grounds for deletion--rather one must argue that the article cannot be cleaned up and reliable sources cannot be found to establish |notability.  This must be ''demonstrated'', not merely asserted.  I am finding more sources than are currently on the article.  A quick search: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Alison+Green%22+PETA&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a.  However, I don't think that articles she has authored are sufficient to establish notability; the majority of those hits are ones she has authored.  There is other coverage in there, her giving a proctor-and-gamble executive a pie-in-the-face at a protest.  But in my opinion not enough to establish notability.  The MPP link that Another Believer gave is not independent.  The book she authored: http://www.amazon.com/Managing-Change-World-Nonprofit-Leaders/dp/0615273416 does not seem to even be easily available, and I can't even find basic publishing info, let alone any reviews in reliable independent sources.  To other editors: please, if you want to argue to delete, do more work instead of just throwing in your two cents.  If you did your homework before commenting, please share your insights in such a way that clearly demonstrates your points instead of just asserting your perspective
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)