Deletion of The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe

Comment: Clearly passes  with extensive reviews such as http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=157020&sectioncode=1 this one by Ilya Prigogine for ''The Times Higher Education Supplement'', http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/03/26/reviews/000326.26saundet.html this in ''The New York Times'' and http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BG&p_theme=bg&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EADDE1DD43C36B5&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM this in ''The Boston Globe''. No disrespect intended to Headbomb and Xxanthippe, but I prefer to accept a Nobel Laureate's judgment over theirs about the notability of this book it its field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: This book seems to be covered by the "acedemic book" section of otability (books) in that it is published by an academic press (Oxford press) and it is widely cited in other academic publications (both journal articles and other books). Some of these other books discuss its contents in some detail for example: http://books.google.com/books?id=3HzM81Npw64C&pg=PA131&dq=%22The+End+of+Time:+The+Next+Revolution+in+Our+Understanding+of+the+Universe%22&lr=#v=onepage&q=%22The%20End%20of%20Time%3A%20The%20Next%20Revolution%20in%20Our%20Understanding%20of%20the%20Universe%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=HCU1uiA5encC&pg=PA55&dq=%22The+End+of+Time:+The+Next+Revolution+in+Our+Understanding+of+the+Universe%22&lr=#v=onepage&q=%22The%20End%20of%20Time%3A%20The%20Next%20Revolution%20in%20Our%20Understanding%20of%20the%20Universe%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=3GUrI9lxpJEC&pg=PA100&dq=%22The+End+of+Time:+The+Next+Revolution+in+Our+Understanding+of+the+Universe%22&lr=#v=onepage&q=%22The%20End%20of%20Time%3A%20The%20Next%20Revolution%20in%20Our%20Understanding%20of%20the%20Universe%22&f=false.  Google scholar gives 32 publications that cite this book as a reference. According to http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0195145925/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_3?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=0753810204&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0FJ3WTE9EDG6KKK6NWRJ#noop Amazon the book has been reviewed by both Publishers Weekly and Library Journal. The article probably needs to cite some of this secondary material, but it doesn't seem to have a notability problem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)