Deletion of Neal Porter

Comment: I realize that the sourcing for this article is poor and even stated so in my keep opinion.  However, the article is very new, and tagging it for additional references would make sense since there is evidence that he fulfills one of the criteria of .  If later, there is no improvement, the article can still be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-23976778_ITM This article would indicate that having an imprint named after the editor is a significant achievement in the publishing world.  In particular, this represents being "regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors" as per the first point of .  Because such an imprint is essentially a one man show, the awards to the imprint reflect significantly on the editor.  Better sourcing is needed for the awards but http://www.editors-sa.org.au/?q=keynotes this does establish that his imprint (and by implication him) is award-winning.  This does not fall into  due to the nature of a named imprint as outlined above.  To be sure, reference improvements are needed, but that is an issue for editting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:INHERITED)