Deletion of Creative Physics

Comment: Pure . Time to break out the  shovel
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SNOW)

Comment: fails , , and others. This is a net.crank's biography/ad for his own crankiness
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BIO)

Comment: The article makes very little sense, and nothing I've seen in a trawl through physics journals and Google suggests that it would be possible to rescue it. One unrelated hit on a physics journal, and 19 GScholar hits whose value I can't determine because I have no idea whether they're related to the article's subject matter. Seriously, what is it even about? The run-on sentences full of names and titles don't help readability either. Unverifiable as it stands, as nom points out  is likely. Notable - who knows
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N)