Deletion of Gates' law

Comment: Although this might make a useful footnote to Wirth's law.  The "references" contradict themselves about the putative source of this aphorism, there's no original source to which one can refer; I agree with the nominator that this is non-|notable and there are no |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: non-notable |Neologism.  Get the term added to the Hacker's dictionary or some equivalent authority first, and then it can have an article.  It's certainly cute, and now that I know it, I can't wait to use it in conversation. But it doesn't need an article yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)