Deletion of Sarah M. Tillman

Comment: External  biographical information from an independent source is ''extremely important''. To say that it has little bearing or significance is to ignore one of the fundamental criteria of notability guidelines of Wikipedia. The fact that Sarah Tillman has not been the subject of any independent work/review shows that she is not a noteworthy illustrator. As mentioned before |notability is not inherited. That is not to say that without the illustrations the book would've been different. Maybe it was an integral part or maybe it's not. The point is that none of the reviews say anything about the importance of the illustrations (i.e. without them the book would not have been the same) To claim that it does without any citable references goes against Wikipedia's Wikipedia:No original research|no original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: So what do we have here?. There is not enough reference to show a notable illustrator, doing an illustration for another notable person's book, Salvador Plascencia, wont work because |Notability is not inherited. If this person were a notable columnist then there will have to be some citation of other people writing about her as such
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)