Deletion of CallMeCarson (3rd nomination)

Comment: The subject, lacking the allegations (exclude per ), is not notable. We are not a current news media outlet but an encyclopedia. Trying to add sensationalism as a reason for encyclopedia notability is insane. Just from what I read this is too flimsy to even attempt to cover. Even "if" there are charges, it would likely be federal concerning nude photographs of an under-aged person, and would just be a criminal act, not encyclopedia worthy. "If" nothing criminal results we (Wikipedia) would be spreading |harmful content. In this case, possible inclusion fails all three points of the #TEST|inclusion test. Without trying to figure out how to add the allegations, to add notability, there is none
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME||WP:HARM||WP:HARM)

Comment: The previous AfD was mostly Keep votes, some of which put forward that  should be applied differently to internet personalities who don't attract traditionally sufficient coverage. I don't think I agree with that, and regardless of if I do or not, such a concept is not currently supportable with any policy we have
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)