Deletion of Joel Manning

Comment: per .  Also, since Wikipedia is |not a crystal ball, there's no reason to have an article on an actor until they have established themselves.  We aren't in the business of predicting who will get big (or for that matter of giving free publicity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT)

Comment: Clearly non notable and fails . Its a puff piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per lack of coverage, fails . Listing in IMDB alone is not notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom, per Bwithh and per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: fails  and has  issues. Reads like a promo
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COI)

Comment: Subject fails the central requirement of .  No evidence of multiple features in national cultural publications.  Citing an IMDB listing and a personal website are both of relatively little value under this guideline.  I googled several pages deep and found no media mentions in notable publications, and not much that isn't either an automatic listing (IMDB) or Joel Manning-created content.  There's no independent fan website.  Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom, per Bwithh, per . Also for slightly smarmy tone regarding our ignorance about SAG. Please list your biography with them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: despite hairsplitting by author on what constitutes an "extra", does not meet  and has not played notable roles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Wikipedia is not an actor/dancer database, regardless of whether an article is self-promotional in nature. This subject shows no indication of coming close to passing  with his various bit parts/extra roles. He is not "clearly notable". Look at his IMDB entry - "Dancer" (in Clerks II and Jackass 2 and others) and "Lovin' Spoonfull #2 Bass Player" and "Zombie #2" etc. are not major roles. The "Mike Nesmith" role is also a bit part or at best a minor speaking role in one episodehttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt0511729/. So he is liked enough by the producers of American Dreams that they gave him bit part roles on more than one episode. He also got a couple of single episode bit parts (as a background dancer for a single scene in the most recenthttp://joelmanning.com/?p=68) on not-well-known sitcoms. This is not encyclopedically notable. Its not notable enough for a magazine. This is not even "up and coming" unless we work for his agent (and besides, no crystal balling on Wikipedia). Allowing articles like this would mean open season on Wikipedia for every struggling/"up and coming" Hollywood actor with a couple of TV bit part credits on their resume
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)