Deletion of Hannah Giles

Comment: 80&nbsp;percent of the article is nothing more than stuff that can be found ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy|here. Only two sentences in the entire article actually discuss who she is. I honestly cannot believe this is even debatable. It fails  by a mile
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: per  and Ronnotel. Her notability has definitely increased, especially now that ACORN has filed their lawsuit. Taking that into consideration, along with her development of the original idea, involvement in the undercover videos and their far-reaching consequences, she has enough merit to warrant a separate article as noted in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I agree with Ronnotel that the event was highly significant in that it gets thousands of hits and that the viability of ACORN has been questioned.  But the subject herself doesn't seem exceptionally notable; if this is her claim to fame, shouldn't she just be folded into a subsection of the ACORN article?  As it stands now, the substantive portion of the article on Ms. Giles is two sentences to the effect that she is a 20 year old journalism student who studies at Florida International University and writes for BigGovernment.com.  The referenced excerpt from  states "a separate article is ''generally appropriate''", but there isn't much else generally to note about Ms. Giles.  If her notability was only her idea to participate in a video pretending to be a prostitute to see what she could elicit from ACORN social workers, I'm thinking it's more appropriate to include her in the ACORN article instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)