Deletion of Sevana

Comment: As the original PRODer. The article was just slightly beyond . Two Russian patents and one product simply do not meet . No problem with the company's page being recreated once notability is established
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:CORP)

Comment: My point about the article being just slightly north of  doesn't mean I didn't think it should be deleted, just that it wasn't ''eligible'' for deletion under those specific guidelines, which are very strict (for good reasons). And don't give too much importance to the "Russian patent" part - they could be US patents or Canadian patents or Palau patents. It doesn't matter where they were awarded, the point is that the company isn't notable to begin with, and your recent edits seem to indicate you're shifting to "this company ''might'' be important because of their patents", which is also normally |not acceptable as an assertion of notability. We're not trying to make your life difficult here :) This might be an important topic for you, but that doesn't mean it's encyclopedic or otherwise worthy of inclusion. No one here is against the recreation of the page once the company is notable. Wikipedia is intended to ''document'' importance, not establish it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: No, it's obvious from this comment that you do not understand the very concept we are talking about. See |what we mean by "notability." What was said is that since the company's importance, or notoriety, has not been established outside Wikipedia, Wikipedia won't have an article about it. --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)