Deletion of Doge (meme)

Comment: due to the majority of delete votes offering little more than -toned arguments. Sure, BuzzFeed is hardly a reliable source (and I'm surprised it isn't blacklisted as spam), but the rest are a-okay. There also seems to be evidence of purposeful disruption from the nominator, himself, including past history of suspected sockpuppetry also raising concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: WP:RS|Reliable sources are available, and additional are also provided by Lukeno. Also, the arguments to delete sounds like , and comparing this to other memes without pages could be dealt with using : just because a meme has a page, but others don't, doesn't make the former non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-dogecoin-2013-12 Business Insider, http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/confusing-doge-takes-bite-out-unflattering-beyonce-win-internet-2013-2D11741734 NBC News, http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/16/5216862/bitcoin-is-so-2013-dogecoin-is-new-crypto-currency-on-the-block The Verge, http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/what-dogecoin-meme-that-became-hot-new-virtual-currency-1429847 International Business Times, plus the reliable sources that are already in the article, mean that notability for this is easily established. Dogecoin and the meme itself are directly interlinked, of course; the nomination statement, and the one delete vote above me, are mostly based on  with vague notability claims thrown in there to try and hide that fact. There are more reliable sources out there than I have listed, but my awful internet connection right now is preventing me from analysing them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The points outlined by Ziggy Sawdust i agree with. This article has been subjected to many deletion requests because of , the result was always keep. Although I do agree that BuzzFeed may not be reliable and knowyourmeme is not reliable at all, there are many reliable sources that are outlined above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Wait until it gets coverage in books or academic journals, or until the news sources treat it as a past event.  |We are not the newspaper, and we're not KnowYourMeme either.  We need independent sources, and none of the sources are chronologically independent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)