Deletion of Heavy equipment modelling

Comment: per nom, fails ,  gives some results but nothing which provide sufficient notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There's an extensive list of articles and publications about the topic at ''https://www.miniature-construction-world.co.uk/publications.php Miniature Construction World''.  It is therefore notable per the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: for reasons cited above.  Article has potential.  ot paper, and deletion shoukld not be preferred resolution.  See efore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:B)

Comment: Very niche hobby with no sources to back up its notability. If sources are found, it should still be draftified for failing  unless someone actually uses those theoretical sources to improve this mess. PS. If this is kept, we need a better name, the only scholarly source to use this terms refers to software for modelling such equipment for CGI/design purposes. Overall, I can see this being briefly mentioned in some article on modelling hobby, as one of the many subfields of it. It does not warrant a stand alone article, which after all can only be expected to become another fan-list of related toys. What else is thee to say about this? Yes, such models exist, some people collect them, shrug. If nobody writes about the hobby - its history, significance, reception, cultural impact - then it's not a topic for an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)