Deletion of Allen (Cambridge University cricketer)

Comment: the article clearly fails , no SNG pass will help it here. I also don't think this is a plausible redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Those conducting |original research to supposedly narrow it down to two people have failed to account for the fact there is no confirmation this player was an undergraduate in 1820
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)

Comment: Even if the match is first-class; the only thing NCRIC (being a subject notability guideline) creates is a rebuttable presumption of meeting the general notability guideline (and therefore the expectation that we will have enough material to write a proper article). Given how far back in time this chap supposedly played cricket (which was then an entirely amateur sport), and given how unlikely we are to find coverage equivalent to the kind of stuff we get for modern players that far back; given finally that there have been no other sources (beyond alumni records to prove , which isn't sufficient) to demonstrate this supposed notability; the presumption finds itself strongly rebutted. If the only thing we can provide is a generic database like routine statement "X played cricket ...", this is not encyclopedia worthy material, and it fails both  (not a database) and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS||WP:NOT||WP:GNG)