Deletion of Ancient vocal method

Comment: per nom. If he publishes a book and then cites himself here, it's still  |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The only cite is the author's book, and it is therefore a circular reference and original research. Could very well be a |hoax, too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: The current unreferenced article now consists of a fragment from the previous article which no longer makes sense in the context (and was highly dubious in the first place), a copy/paste from Theatre of ancient Greece, and a copy/paste of some remarks I had made during the course of this discussion (taken out of context). The topic is ill-conceived and ill-defined. What is the time scope of "ancient"? And the scope "vocal methods"? Vocal methods could also refer to methods of voice production in oratory and ritual story-telling as well as song. The article appears to be concentrating on ancient Greek theatre, but will that be all?  Will it include material on other cultures? It is a virtual guarantee of becoming |original research and |synthesis, especially since research in this area is both sparse and contradictory. See above for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN)