Deletion of Man Without a Gun

Comment: Television series broadcast nationally and produced by either a major network or a major studio, or both, are inherently notable, no matter how long they ran. The fact this ran for two seasons affirms its notabily even more. This isn't a case of  as this is based upon firmly established precedent and execution of WP's notability policy. It took me 10 seconds to find a listing for this show in one of my numerous TV series encyclopedia books, so I can confirm it's not a hoax, which is the primary reason for the whole RS thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Yes, |there is other stuff that is questionable.  My reason for questioning the notability - as outlined above - is the lack of reliable third party coverage - which is the standard of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Not trying to be argumentitive, but such a criteria of inherent notability for nationally broadcast tv shows is not found anywhere in the |notability guidelines or |proposals, nor is it found in the |common deletion debate outcomes.  Can you show me where such shows are exempt from the general notability guideline of having significant coverage in reliable sources? (And the article has been tagged as of questionable notability for 1 year with no improvement, how slowly are we talking
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:OUTCOMES)