Deletion of Wal-Mart (disambiguation) (3rd nomination)

Comment: and refactor to List of Wal-Mart articles (which is presently a redirect, and its history is enlightening).  The key point here is around —i.e. to group the articles such that end-users can find them.  And per  a category is not sufficient, and is best supplemented by a list
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:CLN)

Comment: Meets  guidelines. There is actually another title that can be added to this: Wal-Mart bill (which redirects to Fair Share Health Care Act). There are some situations where you do place something containing a term in part of its title on a disambiguation page. For example, Washington College gets placed on Washington (disambiguation), and Ford Explorer gets placed on Explorer (disambiguation). This is totally appropriate to do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DAB)

Comment: I thought we resolved this shiat a long time ago. This is NOT a Disambiguation page, the purpose of which should be to separate similarly named but unrelated topics/articles. All items on the page relate to Wal-Mart itself, and as such, should be linked to from the Wal-Mart article, either in the article text or in the "see also" section. Everything on the DAB page should be moved to "see also", with the exception of Wal-Mart intercom codes, which isn't even an article itself, but in fact, links to the Code Adam article. There already is a :Category:Wal-Mart|Category:Wal-Mart, where Wal-Mart related articles can be placed. But this so-called DAB page is NOT a DAB page and should be redirected to Wal-Mart immediately. It violates the spirit and principles of Wikipedia, and quite possibly , by trying to connect so very obscure things with Wal-Mart
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Is inappropriate per .  Only two of the terms, the store and the neologism, are appropriate as the others could not conceivably share the same title.  The two are supposed to be disambiguated with headnotes.  The people saying to keep don't understand our editing guideline at  or else deliberately choose to ignore the consensus expressed there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DISAMBIG||WP:DAB)

Comment: per  guidelines, which allow for disambig pages when two or more articles have identical or similar titles. The primary example given is to disambiguate Mercury (element) and Mercury (planet), among others. Given this argument, you could say that both of these titles should be on a page pertaining to Mercury (mythology) instead because both the element and the planet draw their names from Mercury (mythology). Likewise, many other things called "Wal-Mart" or "Walmart" draw their name from the store and its cultural meaning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DAB)

Comment: Disambig pages are cheap, and I don't think this page violates the intent of . Would not be opposed to renaming to List of Wal-Mart articles, but don't really see a need for that either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DAB)