Deletion of List of developers that have created levels in Super Mario Maker

Comment: It passes the  and . Every entry is sourced to reliable sources per /S, and cover it significantly.  List of levels made in Texas is trivial. List of levels made by someone named Steve is trivial. One made by notable developers, sourced to tbird party sources that dedicate whole articles to it? Definitely not trivial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:VG)

Comment: It's a commercial game and the link to "Polygon‍ '​s "Devs Make Mario" series", Twitch, and the one made under Nintendo's purview makes it read as if it's a built-in . Anyone who has a level on ''Mario Maker'' is a developer of a level for the game, and just because they're a developer in the industry doesn't give them extra notability to stand out in a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)

Comment: per .  --Special:Contributions/143.105.12.138|143.105.12.138
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: although notable, the page consists of little more than a table and there is |no real reason why it needs to be a standalone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:AVOIDSPLIT)

Comment: Despite reliable sources, each is a standalone entry.  Pre-established game developers creating Mario levels has not been considered as a list anywhere outside of Wikipedia.   states, "a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources".  This is not the case here, with two levels being Nintendo PR and the other three being an original ''Polygon'' series.  No one else has put these together as a topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: as failing stand-alone  criteria for  -- significant and lasting coverage of the ''topic'' of the list. In other words, the topics "SMM level designers" or "notable persons designing SMM levels" are not notable. This is a list of trivia with very narrow inclusion criteria. While the article has /RS, they focus on a known person as they happen to be engaged in a design activity, which happens to be ''SMM''. As for lasting notability, the short articles are one-time news events with little in-depth information. As for the typical  reason for lists (like the ones mentioned above), the amount of content is very small and most information is trivia. If the levels are notable, then this can be mentioned there. A quick mention in the game's development section is sufficient. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:VG||WP:SPLIT)