Deletion of Spiritual Atheism

Comment: I think the nominator said it best, while this is a concept that certainly exists and I know many people who have taken a similar belief (myself partially included) but as a term it is very uncommon. There is the one website, "spiritualatheism.com" that uses the term, but it is far from a reliable source. So I have to say delete without merging as a |nonnotable EOLOGISM|neologism without coverage from |reliable sources. I did manage to find this http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/12516, but it doesn't really discuss the actual term as much as the concept, and I'm not sure of its reliability either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:RS)

Comment: Right now I'm undecided between '''stubbify''' and '''delete'''. Current article appears to be |original research veering toward the self-promotional, so current article has to go. However, underlying topic may be marginally notable, although there seems to be a haystack of personal-page type unreliable sources from which it might be possible to extract a needle of reliable ones
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)