Deletion of Robert Niter (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nominator's definition of a reliable source seems contrary to what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source. Recommend nominator review  under "What counts as a reliable source."  Wikipedia doesn't define a Google search under "NEWS" tab as a sole reliable source.  The nominator was swift to demonstrate that a Google search for "Robert Niter" did not list one reliable source regarding the bodybuilder.  However, the Wikipedia article for Robert Niter clearly states that the bodybuilder is known as "Rob Niter."  Upon performing a Google search for "Rob Niter" (under the condition of the nominator), and clicking the "NEWS" tab; it is revealed that the bodybuilder is featured in an "independent" and secondary article in a well-known and reliably sourced newspaper: https://www.google.com.tr/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=msvWV82XIYaT8QeW_aHwCQ&gws_rd=ssl#q=rob+niter&tbm=nws Periodico Zocalo This is contrary to the nominator's statement that "He is nowhere mentioned in any reliable newspaper." I would highly encourage the nominator to review the Wikipedia article and its entirety prior to nominating for . Recommend speedy keep per
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE||WP:AFD)

Comment: previous Afd nominator claims "non-notable competition" yet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musclemania Musclemania has it's own Wikipedia article.  According to http://musclemania.com/event-schedule/ Musclemania's Official Website, competitions are held globally, to include multiple locations in America, Asia, Canada, Mexico, Australia, Paris, Hidalgo, India and Europe.  I'd agree with Wikipedia that Musclemania is a notable competition.  Although thousands compete, the bodybuilder's image and name was chosen to grace the front cover of the Texas Tour of http://musclemania.com/event-schedule/ Musclemania's Official Website.  I could only assume that his competition standing was a determining factor.  This bodybuilder, http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?Search_Arg=TXu001990876&Search_Code=REGS&PID=S2gAFq6d0tmX6wbH73MjmyREK&SEQ=20160508170652&CNT=25&HIST=1 author, and https://payhip.com/b/t4SK writer is also verified as a https://www.facebook.com/robniter/ public figure, media company or brand. After careful consideration, I'd still have to say the bodybuilder easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: In evaluating the comments, I have responded to each wikipedian's claim with strong evidence in supporting this bodybuilder's article.  I've used good faith to remove parts of the article that others have written that gave the appearance of "promoting" the bodybuilder and inaccurate data.  What I haven't received is the "why" factor.  Why does this bodybuilder not meet .  In my review, I hear "concern" but that doesn't tell me that this bodybuilder isn't notable. I hear that one is not "convinced" but nothing to follow as to why.  Example, one member wrote that their was no news sources in which it was later provided.  I hear things regarding "specifics."  The specifics of any article in Wikipedia should be VERY SPECIFIC and include sources as to challenge anyone in question.  Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article.  I still stand by this bodybuilder as being notable based on  He meets the bar.  The topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: An '''American''' professional bodubuilder is not in the news. The answer to the IP's query (''who surprisingly knows about '') is this: https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=ojDWV831NML08weA9b1o&gws_rd=ssl,cr&fg=1#q=Robert+Niter&tbm=nws He is nowhere mentioned in any reliablenewspaper, website, magazine, bodybuilding magazine, even for once. The only result is about a Staff Serageant and even that mention is not detailed. Keep votes by ''IP editors, article creators and accounts with very less edits'' is not proper reason to close this discussion. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)