Deletion of Clips4Sale

Comment: rated just above 1500 in Alexa rank  and more sources given above by Storm, this is clearly not vanity website. And websites are not bound by  that's for companies not websites. It does meet  guideline because of this coverage https://thefpl.us/episode/209, in magazine, https://wearyourvoicemag.com/news/social-media-sites-soft-banning-sex-workers-matters, in HW reporter https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/fetish-group-nancy-grace-dancing-stars-fart-245592. These sources and the one I added below (with many from others here), they definitely established , as it is widely recognized by independent sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NWEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: looks like a advirtisememt. Fail to covegege  and . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: as site passes . Site is mentioned in many  sources as oldest and major in its field like https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop/7866034/selena-gomez-fetish-sexologist-dominatrix-interview by Billboard, http://torontosun.com/2017/09/30/requiem-for-the-porn-kings/wcm/a3cfc033-173e-46ed-b8e3-dfdd6ffad7c2 by TorontoSun, https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/1849782/british-housewives-are-making-a-killing-by-shooting-porn-at-home/ by The Sun I know its tabloid, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/fetish-group-nancy-grace-dancing-stars-fart-245592 by Hollywood Reporter and https://www.google.com.uk/search?q=%22Clips4Sale%22&rlz=1C1RLNS_enPK765PK765&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjN06yL2_LXAhWLFZoKHRs_Db0Q_AUIDCgD others. It is expected that there will sources (Fetish magazines) enough for full fledge article. No need to pass  when it is a website
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails the criteria for establishing notability, the references provided fail  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Reviewing the Guardian and Mel Magazine articles in addition to AVN (magazine)|AVNhttp://avn.com/business/articles/video/minute-by-minute-clips4sale-is-giving-the-public-what-it-wants-26393.html plus several mentions in through sources found in Google News plus the mention in Porn Studieshttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23268743.2013.863659. Yeah, this passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: the only coverage of substance in the article is the Guardian and the AVN interview of the founder, using only his first name. If this were truly a leading site, you'd expect to see more. The other articles are just passing mentions. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)