Deletion of Charlotte Kemp

Comment: Yes, she passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: The criteria on  is for deciding if a porn performer is notable. It's not a general notability criteria. Item 3 should be interpreted as "''Every porn actress that has been featured on the cover of Playboy is notable''", and not as "''every woman featured on the cover of Playboy is notable''". Thus, '''delete''' and ignore misguided ''keep'' votes by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Passes . By the way, PORNBIO is part of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:BLP)

Comment: Unquestionably passes  with sources listed, clearly established under Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Pornographic_actors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Easily passes .  I suggest that the nominator read  since they've AFD'd this article, deleted seven other Playmate articles, and prod'd at least a dozen more.  Perhaps he should have looked into the applicable notability guidelines before going on his slash and burn quest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:POINT)

Comment: Passes , was a Playboy Playmate, for which I believe every single one ever has a page and trying to pick and choose will waste everyone's time.  Reminds me of nom for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 74 (UK series), where nominator neglected to notice that article was one of 100s in a series.  I deprodded this one when I saw nominator had prodded a raft of playmate articles in rapid successions without any examination evident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)