Deletion of Jonathan Zizmor (2)

Comment: I wouldn't go to him, but he's been a pretty common household name (if at least for comedic value) for awhile now. Press coverage meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Zizmor is famous.  It's for something tacky--relentless self-promotion--but I think the argument is being made here that "tacky" equals "trivial to the point of irrelevance".  It's very clear the "non-trivial" part of  refers to the depth of content written in articles about the subject, not any editor's opinion about the importance of subject, and that's being ignored here.  The ''New Yorker'' piece shows his cultural notability--as soon as I saw this AfD I remembered that piece.  If you search nytimes.com for "Zizmor" you get 23 hits, 20 of which are about him.  In an ''NYT'' article about Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, which you can read on their http://www.yctorah.org/content/view/32/11/ website, the fact that Zizmor's on the board of the school is worthy of mentioning, and not just in a list.  There are several other ''NYT'' articles that are features about him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I don't see how he meets the criteria in .  Just because he is a nice bit of trivia for native New Yorkers doesn't mean that he is notable.  What has he done to make himself remembered in the field of dermatology other than spending a lot on advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)