Deletion of Jorge Vargas González (2nd nomination)

Comment: Quibbling over whether a population of 13,000 makes a place a "little village" or not is entirely orthogonal to the point, which is that a population of 13,000 is ''not'' enough to hand all of the place's mayors an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing as mayors. Yes, ''maybe'' a mayor of a place this size could manage to pass  #2 on depth of press coverage, but it's far from clear that that's true here: this is entirely too dependent on |primary sources (birth and marriage certificates from the civil registry office) and routine election coverage and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage that isn't ''about'' him — and while there are a few sources that are actually reliable and independent and strongly enough about him to count for something, there aren't ''enough'' of those once you discount all the weaksauce stuff. ''Every'' mayor of ''everywhere'' can ''always'' show three or four or five media hits, so the way to make a smaller town's mayor notable is not just to show three or four or five media hits — it's to show a depth and range and volume of coverage that marks him out as a ''special'' case of significantly ''greater'' notability than most other mayors of places this size. But the volume of reliable and substantive coverage in genuinely GNG-worthy sources shown here is not accomplishing that: it's just matching "what every mayor can always show", not lifting him into the realm of the special
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: A town of 13,000 population is not a "little village". Someone may fail  but pass , which seems to be the case here. Review the article's references and consider whether the person passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)