Deletion of Neville Lancelot Goddard

Comment: there are topics I ''personally'' think are complete nonsense - like Iridology.  But I recognize  requires me to ignore my personal conclusions when evaluating a topic's notability.  When good faith contributors find and neutrally cite genuine reliable sources about Iridology, and other topics from my least favourite topics list, I will defend the articles on those topics at AFD.  It doesn't matter if I think Godard sounds like a kook, or if other contributors here think he sounds like a kook, since it looks like good faith contributors found and neutrally cited genuine reliable sources that establish he measures up to GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Meets , and useful for historical reference. I did a few searches and don't think this is a non-notable author
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: does not meet  nor , for lack of reliable, independent sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NFRINGE)