Deletion of International Federation for Human Rights

Comment: most educational and encyclopedic. Also, , but sources do exist out there for further quality improvement of the article's contents. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP)

Comment: Yes, the article is poorly sourced, but, as JTdale pointed out, the organization seems to be a well-known and well-respected organization in Europe whose expertise is often called upon by the media, which I think satisfies . Also, the organization has a long history, and judging it based on the lack of sources online strikes me as a form of recentism. I also think it's very significant that the FIDH is the oldest human rights organization in the world; I don't know if that's attracted the requisite widespread attention, but if it has, that would also satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NGO)