Deletion of John Green (MP)

Comment: Quite obviously meets the requirements of . Ludicrous nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Barely satisfying  is still satisfying . Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NPOL)

Comment: clearly notable as an MP. '''But posibly move to Greene?''': it's not clear whether his name is "Green" or "Greene" - see my note on the talk page. Could someone with access to a useful  please check? (Too early to be in "History of Parliament": Hansard has him as "Greene", probably more reliable than Rayment who has "Green"; article title and text are at odds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Clearly passes  as he was elected to Westminster on numerous occasions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Proposer is attempting to promote John Green (author) by deleting all namesakes from Wikipedia, e.g. John Green (Medal of Honor) who is also unambiguously notable as a Medal of Honor recipient per , and John Green (judge), who plainly meets . Proposal says the article fails to satisfy  and  but offers no indication of what searches have been done for sources, suggesting  has not been done
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: as creator).  says: "1. Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature". Green was for 18 years an elected Member of Parliament in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, which is a national legislature. Why does the nominator describe that as "barely" meeting NPOL? I will add some more refs, but this nomination appears to be completely ill-founded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)