Deletion of Belle Knox

Comment:  with all this tabloid media coverage, some of the keep rationales are flawed, stating that she doesn't meet  because she did movies and so forth, the news coverage borderlines on tabloid junk, and she's been accepting of that personality. But per our guidelines, the policy is clear
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Easily passes the . Not a one event person as she made multiple pornos . I did a search on her and there was a lot of returns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails PORNBIO but passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Back when the story first broke, this would have been a BLP1E issue, with the event being "outing of a Duke University porn student."  But as the story has gone on, she's being used in other context, in other stories - "porn student outed for doing porn" and "porn student had to do porn to pay for school" are different stories, as the second has been standing alone in independent coverage, divorced from the first story.  She's not a low-profile individual at this point and I don't think, even if she was, that we're even dealing with one event anymore.  The variety of coverage of this individual strongly suggests to me that that she falls squarely within the general notability guidelines.  Guidelines for porn notability don't really apply here either as the basis of the arguments for her notability aren't based on her personal accomplishments in the pornographic industry, they're based on the general guidelines.  It's irrelevant that Lee Harvey Oswald fails  because his notability is derived from another story, even if the abilities he trained in were utilized in that other story
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: Relevant, perhaps weak on , but this could evolve further into privacy rights, women's rights, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: People who want this article deleted should find a more compelling argument than . First, the same nominator, in his deletion rationale, basically says this is not a BLP1E case ("So far this person's life seems to meet the first 2 of these 3 criterion" when BLP1E requires each of three conditions to be met). Furthermore, actually, the subject seems to fail '''every''' BLP1E criterium, as the person is no longer being covered by reliable sources just in the context of a single event, the person is not a low-profile individual, and her ''individual's role'' is substantial
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: With all due respect to those who feel this article should be kept, I think this is the canonical example of . The article subject is an otherwise low-profile individual notable in the context of a single event and the ensuing news coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Just a flash in the media pan
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: not sure how relevant this is regarding notability in the light of  but coverage can be found in Spanish newspapers too http://www.abc.es/medios/20140306/abci-belle-knox-porno-pagar-201403061335.html. Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Everyone seems to be missing the point about 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: No offense to the subject or anyone else's rationale, but this isn't a new thing at all; back in the 90's the major networks and Lifetime harangued the public with 'I strip to pay for college' news stories/TV movie adaptations all the time, and this isn't very different from that at all besides the new twist of online harassment. I have  concerns, along with the usual "speck in the 24 hour news cycle" facet these stories usually get
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per my analysis above. No valid rationale given, not a  per nominator's own analysis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)