Deletion of Badboy Lifestyle 2

Comment: per , , and the desperate grasping for sources. Let 'em take their Walled garden (media)|walled garden elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:SPAM)

Comment: unless the truly unexpected happens and genuinely reliable sources, multiple in number, happen to be found) per nom and Calton. This is part of a walled garden of seduction |vanispamcruftisement, no two ways about it. It has no place in an |encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA||WP:ENC)

Comment: How about actually providing some ''reasons'' why the article supposedly fails .  It has two sources, plus a link to a TV segment.  How is that non-notable? (Also, there are more articles listed on their http://www.badboylifestyle.com/?lang=en&badboy=page,Media media page in magazines like Playboy and Cosmopolitan that could be incorporated into the page.)  As for being a "list of someone's ideas about seduction," that "someone" is the founder of the company.  Don't you think his ideas about how seduction works are relevant to this page, considering that the company makes money by teaching them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)