Deletion of Falling Rain Genomics (2nd nomination)

Comment: Usage guide to a |non notable website.  The given reference is a passing mention in a discussion of geographical sources, not specifically devoted to the website itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails the primary notability criteria as has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Its a useful resource for determining the elevation of locations for geographic articles but the article is essentially a how-to guide, so also falls foul of  as noted above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: Non-notable website, fails .  I don't think we've been systematically spammed, as the site does provide some useful data for lots of really obscure places.  I'm unsure if its a RS though.  But I agree that that has nothing to do with its notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: would not appear to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: not notable site, 14000 links from WP seams like |Spam links to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: Non-notable, largely agree with nom. Also . Agree with Moondyne too - many, many sites by the way are used as Wikipedia references (although this one shouldn't be IMHO due to the number of inaccuracies and errors) which do not have their own articles, so this is a red herring
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)