Deletion of Danny Vendramini

Comment: Fails , , and , so it really comes down to . I can't find much that would seem to fulfill this criteria. Stuart cites the ''Age'' article, but I'm pretty sure it's not enough to establish notability. Other news sources I've found are basically routine coverage ("amateur biologist has a theory" etc etc) rather than anything close to biographical coverage. Most other sources I've found are blogs discussing what looks like a bit of a  theory (I could be wrong on that -- a biologist or anthropologist would know better). The article is in a completely unacceptable state and the references are mainly primary; it definitely violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE||WP:SECONDARY)