Deletion of Biophoton

Comment: Biophoton" is a term which has mainstream scientific usage: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217984994001266,http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RdXO0o5f4iwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02788579?LI=true,http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9345786 and a lot more http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=biophoton here.  One source states that "Biophoton emission is now a topical field in contemporary science." http://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RdXO0o5f4iwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5  I agree the article needs a lot of work, and the mainstream scientific discourse about biophotons needs to be given prominence in relation to the pseudoscience (,).  But these are all  problems that can be improved through ordinary editing.  The topic itself is notable () and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT||WP:FRINGE||WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:GNG)