Deletion of Ice hockey (film)

Comment: Viewing the nom's contribution list is instructive: in the same ''hour'' in which he filed this AfD, he used the same tool suite to nominate, prod and/or tag eleven articles off the New Pages list, all within hours of creation, and certainly leaving little time to satisfy the requirements of .  I encourage the nom to patrol from the ''back end'' of the New Pages list, rather than from the start, which gives article creators genuine time to work on their articles.  That would've avoided this AfD, I expect, since the article creator did a half-dozen edits ''after'' the AfD was filed.  That sourcing a 50-year-old Russian language film might be difficult I acknowledge, but plainly others have managed, and the answer to that oughtn't be knee-jerk AfD filing in any event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: based upon my own understandings of policy and guidelines and the knowledgeable input from others of my own observations and improvements. We had a poorly written article on a 1964 Soviet film (not a blanket cause to delete), and  exists for a reason. I was not aware that the nominator does not practice diligent  nor was unable to even suppose or guess that |foreign language sources ''might'' exist for a foreign language film... nor that he is unaware of the intent toward cauttion described in . Wow. I'd strongly encourage that {{u|Seth Whales|the nominator}} pay careful heed to #REASON and understand why  exists, and that under  and  deletion does not always serve a growing encyclopedia nor its readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:BEFORE||WP:NONENG||WP:TIND||WP:DEL||WP:PRESERVE||WP:WIP||WP:IMPERFECT)