Deletion of List of janitors

Comment: Publications create silly lists all the time, e.g. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/beauty/news/g5289/celebrities-with-moles/ people with moles, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/17-rich-and-famous-people-who-were-once-homeless-a7350941.html people who were homeless, https://people.com/travel/celebrity-private-islands/ people who owned islands, ad nauseam. Fails : "If this person/thing/etc. weren't X, would it reduce their fame or significance?" (Also, CLN says categories and lists can coexist. It doesn't say they have to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: per Fayenatic london. Satisfies  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN)

Comment: Passes  – see https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/27/3-janitors-went-on-to-become-self-made-millionaires.html this and https://enviro-drycarpetcleaning.com/famous-people-who-cleaned/ that, for example.  As we have a category too then  applies.  And the worst case would be merger into the main article janitor per our policy .  So, there's no case for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:CLN||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I also oppose a merge as . Again, none of these people are famous ''for'' being janitors, or their contributions to the janitorial profession. They are people who were janitors at one point or another who then became notable for ''other reasons'' unrelated to being janitors. We do not maintain a list of people who were waiters once at waiter.{{parabr}}If this ''is'' merged, it should be stripped down significantly to only those people who were janitors at the time of their fame (James Hampton (artist)|James Hampton, Ronnie Woo Woo and William Rodriguez), and not include anyone who was incidentally a janitor and then became famous for something else they did. &spades
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)