Deletion of Popular beat combo (2nd nomination)

Comment: The subject passes our notability guidelines... also It is disruptive to keep nominating the article until you get a different result.   
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: I haven't been able to find any evidence of |significant coverage in reliable sources. There is some coverage that ''use–mention distinction|uses'' this phrase, but very little that discusses it. The sources that do discuss the phrase amount to a series of trivial mentions, and so fall short of the requirement for ''significant'' coverage. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Came here from ANI, apparently I said I would !vote delete if this came up at AfD, and I still agree - this violates  and the references do not support anything beyond the fact the term has been used, along with potential  explaining how the term has been used
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:OR)

Comment: Fails . No significant coverage discussing the phrase in detail. The claim it "may be used as an ironic or journalistic synonym" is followed by four references, none of which are secondary sources supporting the statement, but which appear to be given as examples of usage which would be appropriate for a dictionary but not an encyclopedia, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: per keepers. The article is not a stub; it covers this small subject pretty adequately, though more refs would be nice. I don't see how it can be said that "The article seems to be based on riginal Research and ynth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:S)