Deletion of List of compatible and incompatible programs for Windows Vista 64

Comment: But how will you prove what works and what doesn't? It's probably all going to be original research? (
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as  is pretty clear that Wikipedia is not a directory. A single page that intends to list every piece of software that is available, whether or not it is compatible with 64-bit editions of Windows Vista, is hopelessly unmaintainable.  There are well over 100,000 pieces of software that have been written for Windows over the years; if someone wants to find out if a particular piece of software is compatible with 64-bit editions of one specific operating system, they aren't going to come to this article to find out -- they'll either go to the article in question, or to the software vendor's web site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Hey don't be so negative, you have generated a lot of discussion and hopefully we have all learnt something here (well most of us anyhow). The only way any of us find out is often by making attempts and getting rejected. Wikipedia has many many different policies, but one of the major ones is  and it can be a bit of a Kangaroo court|kangaroo court, it's a pity some people have not read, or have forgotten Wikipedia:civility|civility, a core wp policy, and one I try to keep to and something others should read carefully and thoughtfully. You to can help yourself by reading as much as you can. Start with  and , and others in you welcome message on your talk page. Don't be discouraged and Wikipedia:Be bold|Be bold
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS||WP:ISNOT||WP:MOS)