Deletion of 42nd Canadian federal election

Comment: This article contains no real information.  About the only thing certain is that there will be a 42nd election.  We also say there will be an election on October 19, 2015 unless there isn't.  That's basically a tautology.  One can make an equally valid prediction, by saying the world will end on October 19, 2015, unless it doesn't.   Everything happens on a particular date, unless it doesn't.  Canada doesn't have fixed election dates.  The legislation requiring them has already been ignored (in 2008 an election was called, without a no confidence vote).  And there's also the possibility of the law being changed by parliament (since it's not part of the constitution).  We say how many seats are in the current parliament, but not how many there will be in the future, because we don't know.  So, there will be 308 seats, unless there isn't.  Great.  Articles like this are great for the US, when there are numerous meaningful, notable things that can said about future elections.  We should employ the |general notability guideline.  Where are the multiple independent substantial sources covering the 42nd federal election?  So far, all I see are half a dozen sources that don't mention 2015.  Notice how the first citation mentions this year's election, but makes no mention at all, of 2015.  This entire article is basically  with a dab of .  Let's wait till we actually have elections on pre-determined dates, before we pretend they exist in Canada
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SNYTH||WP:OR)

Comment: I'd love to say  if it said stuff about future events like . Might as well make a 43rd, 44th, or 45th federal election article with the same speculation about dates. Nothing of relevance to be said that cannot be covered by what is already known about the Canadian electoral process.--Special:Contributions/70.80.234.196|70.80.234.196
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: for now. This kind of thing isn't even useful as a placeholder — until we can actually say something |verifiable and |sourceable about it, we don't need an article about it. We don't yet know whether #41 will produce a majority government (the basic precondition for the 2015 date to actually mean squat) or a minority (which will virtually guarantee an earlier date). We don't yet know who will belong in the "Prime Minister before election" field. We don't yet know how many seats any party will or won't have; we can't yet assert even one potential election issue. Put simply, I don't understand why ''this'', which was started literally within minutes of last Friday's confidence vote, is a top priority that needed to get rushed into place the moment #41 was in motion — between the eternal problems of monitoring for partisan spin and unelected candidates posting their campaign brochures without regard to our inclusion rules, let's concentrate on getting our coverage of ''this'' election done right before we start worrying about our article on the next one, 'k
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)