Deletion of Proposed Israeli Nuclear First Strike on Natanz Facility

Comment: per nom, ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BALLS||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:LAUNDRY)

Comment: per , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Even if this article were accurate, I'd say delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: As the originator of the article, the intention was to use these unfolding events as an illustrative case study of the more general concept of nuclear preemption. I note that nuclear preemption does not seem to have been dealt with yet on wikipedia which is a pity since it is an important aspect of nuclear deterance which is clearly becoming more relevant due to the inevitable march of technology. I have proposed that the original article be merged into Plans_for_strikes_against_the_Iranian_nuclear_program which should in term be linked to from nuclear preemption as an illustrative case study. This move would deal with the article name being POV which, I agree, is inappropriate. In its current form the article does not violate ,  or . I strongly disagree with your opinion that "Personally, I don't think that a newspaper report that generated a few days worth of controversy but seems to have been otherwise ignored is at all notable." in that a potential aggresive nuclear first strike is clearly a major event in human history .... potentially only the third to be precise. I also find it interesting that you hold this opinion and yet have contributed such articles as July_2006_Seattle_Jewish_Federation_shooting, which would seemingly also be inappropriate by your standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT)