Deletion of Michael Koelsch

Comment: This is a clear case where  is called for. I also agree that both the article and the efforts to add links to it into scores of other articles seem promotional. Does not seem to pass  - almost all mentions are trivial.  standard also not met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Just when you think you've seen everything here, something like this shows up. I am in agreement that this is a solid case of  as the article, even in it's somewhat pruned state is vastly bloated and inflated and unencyclopedic. It's impossible to determine what is real. The LA Times article is good but all of the other refs I examined (who has time to review 200+ refs?) were trivia with no bearing on notability requirements of GNG or NARTIST. Obviously a PROMO creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)