Deletion of Dianne Hiles

Comment: I'm not sure if Member of the Order of Australia by itself alone is significant enough as an honour, but that honour together with sources having been improved on, and she may pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Being inducted into the Order of Australia is a valid notability claim, and RebeccaGreen has done a very creditable job of |Heymanning the writing tone and referencing up to a much more keepable standard than they displayed at the time of nomination. Bravo
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: the coverage of her doesn't really pass , there's a lot of synth and non-significant coverage in the article as it stands, with the only articles on her being the award and her candidacy. The candidacy articles don't really count, either. If the AM doesn't qualify for , then she fails both the only possible SNG along with GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: She meets  #1 "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor." She is a Member of the Order of Australia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I do not see sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources here. The AM does not qualify for  #1, as has been established many, many times. (AO at least, but really AC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)