Deletion of Martin Engineering

Comment: per  – like Wikipeterproject I can't find any sign of notability. Notability is not inherited, and a firm being run by members of a family that also has notable members does not confer notability on that firm. No sign that this firm was involved with the work by Albert C. Martin, Sr. and Albert C. Martin, Jr.|Jr.; their firm http://archrecord.construction.com/news/daily/archives/060417martin.asp is now called AC Martin Partners. There are many firms called "Martin Engineering" (e.g., in the US, http://www.martin-eng.com/, http://www.martinengineeringsc.com/, http://zkey.net/), and none appear notable. &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I can't find any evidence of notability, as defined in .  This guideline requires "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" and my search doesn't return anything that could be considered "significant".  The article has been significantly culled and its difficult to determine from the article, as it stands, why it should be included in the encyclopedia.  That the article is a stub doesn't, of course, make the subject non-notable, but it does make it hard to research notability when the article makes no mention of the company's achievements, structure or history.  To have any chance of surviving the debate, the article would have to very quickly be enhanced with information supported by the reliable, independent secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)