Deletion of David Lemieux (archivist)

Comment: There's no reason that a leading expert on an important cult(ural) institution like The Dead couldn't be notable; we have lots of articles about Beatles experts too.  The sources provided (and others seen at Google and GBooks searches) make it evident that Lemieux is notable.  The article could be improved by more in-line sourcing, but hey, there's |no deadline, man
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: Notability on Wikipedia, for a person, is not based on their occupation, or on the reason that they are known.  It's based on the |general notability guideline, and on the |notability criteria for people.  Quoting the first, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."  Based on the references currently in the article, David Lemieux is a notable subject, and so the article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTEBLP)

Comment: Passes . Source examples include: http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/Every-single-note-of-Dead-s-famous-4-night-run-is-2574874.php, http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/lost-grateful-dead-show-collectors-are-going-to-flip-out-20131114, http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/grateful-dead-archivist-david-lemieux-announces-new-live-series-20111024, http://wncx.cbslocal.com/2012/11/01/grateful-dead-release-free-almanac-app-archivist-david-lemieux-coming-to-rock-hall/, http://www.dead.net/features/news/glide-magazine-david-lemieux-key-deads-vault, http://www.relix.com/articles/detail/beyond-cornell-david-lemieux-on-the-grateful-dead-archives-and-may-1977, http://www.relix.com/blogs/detail/grateful-dead-archivist-david-lemieux-discusses-dave-s-picks-7
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)