Deletion of Feel Tank Chicago (2nd nomination)

Comment: After assessing everything up until now, Francois is right. There are not enough independent secondary sources that cover this organization in detail, making it fail  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG)

Comment: As usual I started out ready to delete this, but once I did my  sources popped up: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42981415?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents 1 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=NjxG_SPPBWAC&pg=PA178&dq=%22Feel+Tank+Chicago%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTrvLL_uXfAhXKblAKHZegBMUQ6AEIOTAD#v=onepage&q=%22Feel%20Tank%20Chicago%22&f=false 2 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=5alvDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT268&dq=%22Feel+Tank+Chicago%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTrvLL_uXfAhXKblAKHZegBMUQ6AEIPjAE#v=onepage&q=%22Feel%20Tank%20Chicago%22&f=false 3 https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6N2oAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA110&dq=%22Feel+Tank+Chicago%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiTrvLL_uXfAhXKblAKHZegBMUQ6AEIRzAG#v=onepage&q=%22Feel%20Tank%20Chicago%22&f=false 4 https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/421150 5. whilst the subject matter might seem like nonsense, well, this doesn't make it not encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per nomination. Irrespective of one's opinion about the group's purpose and activities, the subject simply does not meet Wikipedia's requirements for |notability. It's a text written |without sources, full of |personal input, and clearly crossing over into |promotional territory. Well, Wikipedia is not the place for |advocacy nor is it a |list of indiscriminate information. Let's just say 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:PROMO||WP:ADVOCACY||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:TOOSOON)