Deletion of Truck nuts

Comment: Please remember not to personally attack other editors and to keep your remarks |civil. As for who dictates what is not notable — well, that's the whole point of this discussion. I'm hardly alone in this determination. For the record, my edits to this article were 1) the original {{tl|prod}} and 2) the AfD notice. As for being contested in the Senate, there's gotta be a Larry Craig joke there somewhere
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: Please refrain from making comments in an article that are about the article, as was done http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Truck_nuts&oldid=156295831 here. Comments/discussion about the article belong on the article's talk page.  If the article is being debated in an |articles for deletion, as is the case here, then comments/discussion about the proposed deletion belong on the AfD page. Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: per Dhartung and nominator.  Although there is a newspaper article, per Belovedfreak above, that may confer notability, I agree that the  issue, lack of context,  issue, lack of sources in the article, and the incivility of the author render this problematic as it is. The article was created,  proposed, contested, nominated for , vandalized by the author, and finally reverted by me, all on the same day, September 7th.  I usually argue that if the article can be fixed, then it should be fixed, but in this case, I just don't see it becoming an acceptable article. Therefore, unless an established editor is willing to take it in hand before the AfD discussion period expires, delete without prejudice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SPAM||WP:PROD||WP:AFD)