Deletion of Introduction to genetics (3rd nomination)

Comment: per , we just discussed this last month, and nothing has been proffered to overturn the last two decisions- ake technical articles accessible allows articles in this vein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:M)

Comment: Hardly a clear-cut  case. Introductory articles are not new to Wikipedia and this article appears to be just as informational as it is educational. I also don't see any potential benefit in removing this article from Wikipedia's main namespace. It's fairly well-written, well-sourced and seems to satisfy all major inclusion criteria for standalone articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTEXTBOOK)

Comment: valid |policy-based reason given for deletion, the article does not have "leading questions and systematic problem solutions" so is nothing like a textbook. About a month since the last AfD closed with an overwhelming consensus towards keeping the article. Article acts as a broad intrroduction for several more specialist articles, as per Wikipedia:Make_technical_articles_accessible#.22Introduction_to....22_articles|Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)