Deletion of Eagle Transporter

Comment: to Space:_1999#Special_effects,_design_and_music as it is mentioned there and serves as a valid redirect target. First of all, I find it puzzling that {{u|Michig}}, an admin who I respect a lot, used a combination of , , and  all in one (before  is pulled up, the "Popular" statement is subjective for that to be a common sense either)! Second, I don't see enough evidence like the nominator, that it is independently notable of Space 1999, nor there is any significant coverage of it to be found, making it fail 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ITSIMPORTANT||WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:GNG)

Comment: to the article on ''Space: 1999''. This topic clearly doesn't pass  on its own and a redirect and a few sentences in the main article about the toy being popular will suffice. This isn't a fan website and keep!voters appear to be too wrapped up in fond childhood memories to follow policy. I have great sympathy for them, as I would be upset if "someone" messed with my fond memories too, but that shouldn't guide this AfD. If significant print sources from the 70's are found about the toy at a later time, I would not oppose re-creating the article, which would be easy since nothing is being deleted
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)