Deletion of Reported haunting of Alcatraz

Comment: If http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reported_haunting_of_Alcatraz&diff=546852230&oldid=546850845 edit546852230 by LuckyLouie is kept, there is little reason to keep as a separate article, as it leaves the article as little more than a two-sentence statement-of-fact that could be easily merged into the main article.  If the consensus changes and the old references are found to be valid, then the article should be kept as apppropriate 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: Any accounts of alleged haunting can be mentioned in the main article for Alcatraz Island or Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary if reliably sourced. (Unless that would violate  of course
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: with Reportedly haunted locations in the San Francisco Bay Area.  As this is a  topic and the reliability of the sources currently used in the article is questionable, it seems to me that an entire article dedicated to the subject is .  (As previously pointed out, it's also not standard WP practice to have separate articles dedicated to the "Reported hauntings" of specific locations.)   Yet it is a reliably reported fact that Alcatraz is popular with ghost hunters (e.g. http://traveltips.usatoday.com/alcatraz-ghost-tours-55340.htmlhttp://www.sfgate.com/thingstodo/article/GET-IN-THE-SPIRIT-San-Francisco-Ghost-Society-2610095.phphttp://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100303/ENTERTAIN/100309986/-1/NEWSMAPhttp://heraldbulletin.com/columns/x966805475/Heather-Bremer-Ghost-Hunters-marks-100th-episode-with-Alcatraz-trip?keyword=topstory).  A paragraph or two mentioning this aspect of Alcatraz's reputation is appropriate within the broader context of Reportedly haunted locations in the San Francisco Bay Area
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:UNDUE)