Deletion of Robin Wight

Comment: There are plentiful in-depth sources which indicate his high reputation in his chosen field. Telegraphhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/2888339/The-Wight-stuff.html, Evening Standardhttp://www.standard.co.uk/business/markets/robin-wight-standard-backs-ad-campaign-to-help-disadvantaged-onto-career-ladder-10364680.html, Campaign magazinehttp://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/wcrs-1979-1999-hell-robin-wight-arrogant-modest-it-robin-wight-started-first-agency-university-enthusiasm-strong-30-years-advertising/23447http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/39235319/robin-wight, The Drum (less famous marketing magazine)http://www.thedrum.com/news/2008/04/24/peacockrsquos-tale-robin-wight-shows-his-colours, business books e.g.https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-JLkxwphtO8C&lpg=PT92&ots=sXBlaRopGT&dq=%22robin%20wight%22&pg=PT92#v=onepage&q=%22robin%20wight%22&f=false, plus lots of interviews and stuff about his charitable ventureshttp://www.thedrum.com/news/2016/02/11/george-osborne-praises-77bn-creative-sector-industry-gathers-downing-street-support which show he's a prominent figure. And reviews of his first book.https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/robin-wight/the-day-the-pigs-refused-to-be-driven-to-market/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/107769907405100426?journalCode=jmqb I suspect there are more references from pre-internet days. I don't know about the CVO, which is the 3rd tier of one of several British orders of chivalry, and probably not everybody with it is truly notable, but he meets . The article could be expanded with content on his ideas/books, and there's quite a lot of biographical info in the links I provided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Recipient of the CVO, which has ''always'' been held to meet the requirements of  #1. The quality of the article is irrelevant to its notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: a  page on a subject of marginal notability.  is a policy, while  is merely a suggestion. This article reads like it was written by someone with a close connection to the subject and appears to be a tribute page. Such content belongs on the subject's personal web site, not here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:NOT||WP:GNG)