Deletion of Kiran Sethi

Comment: Usually the socks are a good indication that something's amiss with an article, but I do feel the subject here meets  at least. The references provided are good (reliable, independent, etc.) and clearly not . I didn't focus on the individual details (winning a black belt), which are by themselves non-notable, but on the totality of the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per nomination on account of subject failing . Specifically, subject has not been the {{tq|founder of notable martial-arts style, an Olympic participant or world champion of a significant international organization, a repeated medalist (as an adult black belt, i.e. 1st dan equivalent or higher rank) in a significant event}} nor {{tq|the auhor of a significant book on their style}}. (BTW, we seem to have a small infestation of baby soxers here. {{smiley
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MANOTE)

Comment: I have found and included more sources, and edited the article. I believe that she does meet , with significant coverage over several years for her activities training girls in self-defence, as well as for preventing the kidnap and assault of a girl while she was off-duty
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Roughly BLP1E. FWIW, black belt in Karate is definitely not an extraordinary achievement.But, I need to check whether she passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: Fails . There is significant coverage from the TOI for the felicitation, and https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/woman-cop-saves-visually-challenged-girl-from-drunk-goon/article5710704.ece this from the Hindu is perhaps more than just routine coverage. But there just isn't any real depth to the subjects notability, just some news hype about one event, and subsequent recognition for that event.  as far as I can tell
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)