Deletion of Ted Yu

Comment: To review the situation of the article: (it took me a little while to figure this out, therefore this synopsis.) This article is about the founder of a design company called Conrad Design. It was mainly edited by user ''Margaretkk'', a suspected sockpuppet of ''Conradnana''. The latter was blocked indefinitly for spamming on June 10. The second editor who has weighed in here with a ''keep'', ''Pandalulu'', is a suspected sockpuppet  of the same. Disregarding the block evasion and looking at the article: The claims regarding awards are unreferenced and therefore not verifiable. References to ''Economic Digest'' and ''idnproshop'' are linked to the front pages of the magazines - Economic Digest archive only goes back to 2008, corroboration is not possible. Whether the awards would establish notability would depend on the circumstances: independence, secondary coverage, competitive nature ... again, no evidence of that has been established. The LACP Vision Awards are notable - however the entry I have checked (2006 Awards to Bank of China) has the following problems: the same award is listed three times in the list, the citation lists a company (RR Donnelley Roman Financial) as the author of the cited annual report with whom Ted Yu's article does not document affiliation, and Ted Yu's name is not credited on the citation http://www.lacp.com/2006vision/5885.HTM. This fails  again. It is not clear that the other awards are notable at all. The argument by ''Margaretkk'' that other articles are also really bad is not a reason to keep any of them. In summary: this is not encyclopedic material and there is no indication that it could reasonably be fixed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)