Deletion of Jinyu Liu

Comment: The  C1 case is a little weak on its own -- citations are light, although I do take the keynote address fairly seriously.  (I'm not convinced by the C5 or C2 cases other editors have made.)  There's also an  case, with one book having several reviews, and a second book that shows some signs of being taken seriously.  The combination of the two brings me over to keep, essentially per {{u| Nsk92}}.  {{ping|Eritha| Tagishsimon}} your comments read as if you believe {{u|Onel5969}} to be acting in |bad faith.  Although I am !voting to keep, I certainly don't think this was an unreasonable nomination, and I suggest that you might wish to strike portions of your comments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:AGF)

Comment: Putting aside  (though I think there are several strong arguments that she meets it), the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jinyu_Liu#cite_note-9 five reviews of her book on ''Collegia'' are easily enough coverage to meet the |GNG. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: ping|onel5969}}  criteria 4 is "The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research". The subject is "Distinguished Guest Professor at Shanghai Normal University", which is one of Shanghai's three Key Universities. The point of having criteria is to avoid having to arbitrate each article through AfD. When a person meets the criteria, as this subject clearly does, it is abusive to bring it to AfD. Will you please consider withdrawing this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOLAR)

Comment: I'm insufficiently familiar with Chinese academic titles to have a useful opinion on the Chinese distinguished visitor position. For this sort of subject we tend to judge by books and their reviews () rather than journal papers and their citations (#C1). Her book ''Collegia Centonariorum'' has five published reviews, and if those were split over two books I'd probably already have decided my opinion as a keep or weak keep. She does have another book, but it's in Chinese, so there's a language barrier to finding reviews. Does the Chinese academic literature do book reviews? Are there published reviews of this one? I don't know but it would be helpful to find out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: For the record, I don't think that #C4 applies here. The Distinguished Guest Professor at Shanghai Normal University designation was temporary (2014-2019), as the article itself indicates. For #C4 to apply, a named professorship appointment has to be permanent. However, this appointment still carries considerable prestige and does contribute towards #C1. The https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=GExBIGQAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao GScholar citability data here here is also more impressive than it might appear from the first glance. In a field like classics we'd normally expect extremely low citations, and there to see a fairly recent (2009) recearch item with 170 citations already is fairly unusual. I have added three published reviews of Liu's book to the article. As the article indicates, she received a 5-year New Directions Fellowship (2011–2014) from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation (and it's clear that this fellowship is treated as a big deal in the field from the way it is announced https://isaw.nyu.edu/news/jinyu-liu-receives-mellon-foundation-fellowship). She also gave several named lectures, including the keynote address of the 2020 annual meeting of the Association of Ancient Historians (I added a ref to the article), and several others. There is a detailed https://classicalstudies.org/scs-blog/adrienne-kh-rose/blog-art-translation-interview-jinyu-liu profile interview with her in the editorial blog of the Society for Classical Studies.  This page, https://classicalstudies.org/scs-blog/ SCS Blog, explaons that the blog "is edited and overseen by the SCS Communication Committee" of the Society for Classical Studies. So it qualifies as  under . Overall, I believe there is more than sufficient coverage here to satisfy #C1, especially considering the field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:RS||WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:PROF)

Comment: more or less per the same reasoning as Russ Woodroofe: , the (now six) reviews of one book, and the evidence presented above of possible reviews or at least serious attention for her other Chinese-language book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)