Deletion of PBS idents (3rd nomination)

Comment: The history of a logo is most certainly encyclopedic, and many of the subsections have links directly to the topics.  The article on the Public Broadcasting Service simply cannot contain this discussion.  Hundreds, if not thousands of reliable sources supporting this information can be found, including http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=PBS+logo&cf=all Google News.  This is not original research in any way, and I suggest the nominator familiarize himself with how  is defined.  There is no idea, theory, or agenda being promoted here, but rather a list of logos used by PBS, easily verified and described.  I'm sure the article can be cleaned up and sourced, but it requires editors willing to do the work.  The original version of the article was based on TVARK (www.tv-ark.org.uk) a classic TV website which continues to get favorable reviews in the press.http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/apr/01/tvandradio.theguide2,http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-179586990.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1653071.html  Granted, this website alone isn't good enough for our purposes, but the links to the Google news sources above and other books and PBS documents can be found to support this information.  If there is anything outlandish or unusual in this article, I don't see it, but the dates definitely need to be checked for accuracy.  Previous two nominations resulted in ''snow keeps
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)