Deletion of Ahd Tamimi

Comment: per . The article was only newly created and then nominated for deletion only one day after the arrest. It has now been 11 days since the arrest and there is still continuing coverage so the AfD seems somewhat premature. This person has had coverage in the news since 2012 (also showing ) so  doe not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:1E)

Comment: Ahd Tamimi is not among the ''very'' few  16 year olds who deserves  a ...even Malia and Sasha Obama do not have their own BLPs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: has gained significant notability internationally.  Whether this is in the English-speaking community or not is irrelevant, this argument is an example of systemic bias, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I see developing . There are editorials such as http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/west-praising-malala-ignoring-ahed-171227194606359.html Why is the West praising Malala, but ignoring Ahed? by Al Jazeera, etc. The legal case against Tamimi continues, so we are likely to see continued coveraged. Keep for now; reassess perhaps in 6 mo, if needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: I think it is no more  after the last edits
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: Notability to have a  article is not decided by what she has or has not done or any such merit. The bar that must be passed is the guideline on general notability: , which is determined by verifying  significant coverage  in  sources. Sources must treat the main subject of the article in depth, beyond . Imho there are many sources who discuss her and her actions so the subject lives up to GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STANDALONE||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:TRIVIALMENTION)

Comment: I also see a strong case for , however, at the moment I think it is too premature to be deleted, her court case will be fairly high profiled and she will remain in the news for a while. I also see merit in the argument for merging her article with articles on the other members of the Tamimi family
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Tamimi has been covered various times since 2012 and has surpassed just being |news or an |one-event wonder
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)