Deletion of Aruküla Rock

Comment: Fails  and there's just not much to say about it that would justify a dedicated article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails the Wp:V|verifiability requirements of . According to http://www.geoloogia.info/text.html this, the Aruküla formation is a sandstone bed in the area but there is no mention of specific glacial erratics. The ''Eesti ürglooduse raamat'' mentioned on the article's talk page appears to mention an eponymous cave system, but not a specific rock
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEOG)

Comment: As a named natural feature, if there are '''enough verifiable''' content to write an '''#DICT|encyclopedic''' article, it can have a stand-alone article per .--Special:Contributions/180.155.72.174|180.155.72.174
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: I too agree it fails  and I see no reason to keep as a dedicated subject page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and convert to List of Estonian glacial erratics.  It is a named geographical feature and appears on a national registry.  As such it should not be deleted altogether per  "If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature should be included in a more general article on local geography."  There is one more Estonian rock listed at Glacial erratic so the list could start off with two entries at least with more possibly being extracted from the Estonian article by an editor with the necessary skills
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)