Deletion of Brand Junction

Comment: 10-odd |reliables small article - not that it matters. Seems to follow  quite well. Vgood article. easily passes |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SHOP||WP:N)

Comment: The website indicates some serious brands have already been signed up, and http://www.street-directory.com.au/sd_new/genmap.cgi?x=145.086&y=-37.685&sizex=800&sizey=800&level=5&enlarge=1&star=6 this map (based on the Melway) screams location, location, location. Definitely , searches on Factiva indicate significant current independent coverage - just the article needs to be fixed, and IMO "University Hill" should be substituted for "Bundoora" as the former is a developer name only
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: If I put simply "notable," deletionists would have my neck for using a  arguement.  The same standard should go for AfD nominators.  Per all above, reliable sources indicate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN)