Deletion of Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky

Comment: Doesn't meet  or . It should also be noted that the IP address that authored the article has focused almost exclusively on this page and pages related to the subject. best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable under  for his political activities or  for his writing, but the article is referenced nowhere close to well enough to get him over  in lieu — for ''either'' of those things, the notability test is ''not'' just that the subject ''exists'', but requires that he has enough |reliable source coverage ''about'' him and his work to clear GNG. But that's not what the sources here are showing: this is referenced almost entirely to sources that ''aren't'' support for notability, such as Blogspot blogs and other |user-generated wikis and |primary sources and very short news blurbs that aren't substantive enough to constitute a GNG pass all by themselves. This is ''not'' enough sourcing to get a person over the bar. And when a brand new user with no prior edit history jumps straight to "the nominator has a political agenda" as their rationale for opposing a deletion discussion, without presenting any credible ''evidence'' of the nominator's agenda at all, it's very nearly always a sign that the ''accuser'' has a political agenda to misuse Wikipedia as a promotional venue for the article subject (and thus probably has a direct |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:USERG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COI)