Deletion of West coast phreakers

Comment: as |vanispamcruftisement.  I love the comment that the mag has been compared with 2600 - "Compared with 2600, this is crap" would count
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)

Comment: as |non-notable, vanity ("The co-founder of the group, smes, is quite illusive of where exactly he is from usually only making vague statements to his location such as “Vancouver Island”, or south of Drunken Duncan.")  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Also, I'm not sure vanity is a concern here, but from : ''An article should not be dismissed as "vanity" simply because the subject is not famous.'' - see Phone losers of america for a similar phreaking group article, although that article is more indepth at the moment. (see below
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)

Comment: fails . Also, |Wikipedia is not a primary source of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT)