Deletion of List of Christian apologetic works

Comment: It has already been explained that  is a style guide, not a reason for deletion, and I don't see how any of the criteria of  remotely apply to this article. Maybe the nominator could let us know which criterion he or she had in mind? And, if this is a content fork, it is a perfectly valid |summary style fork: if anything Christian apologetics#Further reading should be culled rather than this article be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:NOTDIR||WP:summary style)

Comment: Merging this with Christian apologetics has one obvious problem: this is a large list, and that is a large article.  There's easily enough material for two articles here, and I'd rather see Christian apologetics#Further reading merged and pointed here if there is any non-duplication.  This is a list of books by notable authors; most of the books themselves are notable enough to support articles even if those articles are yet to be written.  And if there are non-notable entries, that's a matter of editing that does not call for deletion.  Seems a reasonable split and I'm unclear as to how this is supposed to violate |the list formatting manual of style, or why that's a deletion matter.  The topic is specific enough to |not be a directory even if articles like these are as useful to editors as to readers.  If people want to delete it, save it at hristianity first
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:NOTDIR||WP:C)