Deletion of Ryli Morgan

Comment: per nom.  The fact she may be "relevant" to the genre is not part of , or , and is unverified in any case.  For that matter, fails  for lacking any reliable documentation outside of her own website and IMDB.  Only 167 distinct Ghits out of 508 general hits, and Alexa says her website isn't in the top 100,000.  No multiple non-trivial articles by third parties, though there are a few movie fanzines.  No evidence her movies have won awards, been a major work, nor has she won any awards or contributed substantially to her field.  The article is a resume, and WP is not a free webhost.  I'm willing to concede one review of one of her films by Joe Bob Briggs, though considering his interest in her body, I'm uncertain how this would relate to s requirement for '...widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: There is no possible way that this person meets .  Total vanity article.  Non-notable "actress", non-notable "model", non-notable "assistant director", non-notable "singer".  zero+zero+zero+zero still equals a goose egg. I'm sure if she works on the article a bit more she can add "script writer" and "key grip" etc. to her non-notable resume but my answer would still be the same
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: makes some assertions of notability, but I'm not convinced she passes .  Also, removing speedy delete tags is not allowed.  If it happens in the future, restore the tag and put {{drmspeedy}} on the userpage of whoever did the removing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)