Deletion of Jack Schlossberg (2nd nomination)

Comment: per the |notability guideline on articles about people, the relevant guideline for consideration of deletion of this article, which is a biography. The guideline states that a person is notable enough for an article "if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." The guideline also states, "multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability." Although it's too bad that so many sources considered as tabloids have been cited in this article, Jack Schlossberg has been the subject of many other articles, which are independent from each other and the subject himself and are in reliable and reputable publications. Here are several examples
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: for the reasons cited above and in the 7 prior deletion discussions.  Easily passes .  otability#Notability is not temporary is not transient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: a good  would be to merge encyclopedic content to the closest notable direct relative's article and redirect. Special:Contributions/174.212.238.163|174.212.238.163
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: This the 8th (!) AfD (missing one of the list) plus 2 DRVs - how long will this ridiculous campaign to delete the article continue?? Each time the article has added new sources and expanded. It is even more notable today then any time in the past. The deletion arguments are flawed - the topic clear passes . Furthermore |INHERIT essay has nothing to do with it, read it now, including the disclaimer at the top - it is arguments to avoid making during an AfD, that is all, nobody here is making the argument "Keep because he has a famous relative", the argument is Keep because of GNG. The claim made above by Johnpacklambert that this article has "sat around" unexamined is obviously ludicrous in light of the many failed AfDs, extensive edit history and vast number of page views this article receives daily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INHERIT)