Deletion of Earl Doherty (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are multiple reliable sources cited in the article that support notability. Ehrman (''Did Jesus Exist?''), Wells (''Can We Trust the New Testament?'', and Casey (''Jesus: Evidence and Argument or Mythicist Myths?'') all provide substantial discussion and meet the criteria for |reliability and |independence (reinforced by the fact that all are critical of Doherty). The reviews from Zindler, Carrier and Price also count toward notability. The fact that an outlet has an ideological perspective does not disqualify it from supporting notability as long as it has no direct affiliation with the subject. That's six entirely non-redundant independent sources already in the article. If more are needed, there is discussion of Doherty in ''The Pagan Christ'', in ''The Historical Jesus: Five Views'' (Price again, but a better quality source than the ''Free Inquiry'' review), and in ''Reinventing Jesus''. I'm only mentioning substantial discussions that help show notability; there are many lesser mentions and citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IS)