Deletion of Officeyes.com

Comment: The article text describes what this firm does, the references establish its existence and give an idea of its ambitions to be India's equivalent of Staples. Perhaps these can be regarded as meeting , but they seem to me to be more of the typical publicity associated with a start-up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The Financial Times interview is a solid source.  The passing reference in the other FT article has some value.  The Entrepreneur Magazine coverage looks fine, but I'm really unable to tell if this is a reasonable RS or not.  Same with Yourstory.  I'm leaning toward yes on Entrepreneur Magazine and no on YS as reliable sources.  YS looks likely to be a "pay for story" mill, at least in part. So topic seems to meet , if just barely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Subject does not meet ; the two somewhat-acceptable sources (the second ''Economic Times'' source is a passing mention) are industry publications, and the company is discussed as a startup
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: while some sources do exist, I don't think that they go into the depth required by .  At the moment they're a startup with some ambitious expansion plans and obviously a decent PR department
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)