Deletion of Journal of Quantum Information Science

Comment: to Scientific Research Publishing. I see no evidence that this journal is notable, the article creator has a history of promotional edits, and we probably also have a |neutrality problem if we either accept this as a legitimate mainstream journal (despite its publisher) or write the truth about its publisher (without sources that address the legitimacy of the journal itself). Nevertheless, its publisher is notable enough, and redirects are cheap
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I oppose a "merge and redirect" decision. There are several reasons for this: First, the article as it currently stands has zero information sourced to reliable sources (Ulrich's just lists publisher-provided info), so there is nothing supported by |reliable sources here. Second, what goes for this journal, goes for all the other journals from this publisher: are we going to present info on each and every one of their journals (in a neutral way) in the article on the publisher? I already see them opening the bottles of champagne... Third, if the article is not deleted but only replaced by a redirect, we'll have to put that redirect on our watchlists, because given this publishers history of trying to spam WP, we can expect regular attempts to revert the redirect. If there is no redirect, any recreation will pop up on the new article feed and is likely to be picked up by someone. (Of course, this third reason is just an argument of convenience, my first two arguments are the most important ones
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)