Deletion of Allegations of Islamic apartheid

Comment: google hits generally aren't worth anything, neither are  arguments. there doesn't appear to be specific unanimity on the meaning/usage of the phrase either. much of it is simply a replication of the material in Dhimmi and Criticism of Islam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ALLORNOTHING)

Comment: or merge with Criticism of Islam.  This article's |raison d'etre is to mirror Allegations of Israeli apartheid, but there are no RS-foundations on which to build the comparison.  Casual journalistic pieces, interviews and so on have used the word "apartheid" passingly and rhetorically to describe oppression of women and non-Muslims under Islamism, but there are no sustained scholarly, historical, or even journalistic comparisons between Islam and apartheid – only passing mentions, so the RS-context couldn't be more different from that of the Israeli case.  To call the result a quote farm would be an unmerited compliment, because farms involve things which are rooted and substantial.  This is more like a quote bouquet.  Wildflowers gathered in this way may please the picker but they invariably wilt quickly and die off the vine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)