Deletion of Scientific foreknowledge in sacred texts

Comment: not just because of , but because the article totally fails . Besides relegating "criticisms" to a pitiful section at the end, this article doesn't even begin to cover the topic. Where's Dianetics? Buddhist āgamas? Shinto texts? Taoist, Wicca? I suppose the article was better when it just covered the Bible as it did during the 2005 AfD (and this isn't as bad as the PoV fork), and should each religious text be split out, that may satisfy some of the core content policies. Seeing as articles covering the topic already exist though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:DUE)

Comment: Adding another |snowflake to the pile; a mass of |original research, |POV-pushing, and |synthesis that is |beyond salvaging
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:OR||WP:POV||WP:SYNTH||WP:TNT)