Deletion of Jacob Poroo

Comment: where is the ? Subject seems to fail  and all the other arguments here attempting to rationalise why it ''should be'' considered notable anyway given the subject's worthiness (which is not in question) don't seem to hold any basis in policy
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: No indications from the sources that this person is independently notable, and the suggested criteria at  are also not met. The usual way of treating instances where an otherwise non-notable person has a ship named after them is to cover them as part of the article on the ship, which I'd suggest is the solution here. As the ship appears to have been completed and will soon commission, it clearly justifies an article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)