Deletion of Comparison of anonymous exchangers of digital currency

Comment: both "comparison" articles under criteria |G11 as blatant promotion of a non-|neutral POV ("software activists", "protect democracy", etc). However, '''keep''' Digital currency exchanger as a clearly notable topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:NPOV)

Comment: of Comparison of anonymous cryptocurrencies. Based on  service promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11)

Comment: These comparison lists are almost always / and most should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Comparison of anonymous exchangers of digital currency. Based on  service promotion, and that alone is the reason for my opinion. However, I would add that neither of the two services being compared are notable, and the structure of the article makes it inherently dependent on original research (). The topic should be covered without mentioning specific services, or perhaps mentioning services if a reliable source (e.g. Consumer Reports magazine)) covered a similar topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:OR)

Comment: ul|Benboy00}}, with respect, I've undone your edit of attempting to sort comments into lists. It's not unusual to |nominate multiple articles in an AfD and the process was followed correctly here. Most editors who have commented here have explained which articles they support or don't and have given reasons to back up their particular argument, which honestly is better than most AfDs. Anyway the mess is for the closing admin to figure out, and I don't think that sorting comments under sub-headings is going to help; actually it stunts the discussion because most people who watch AfD don't expect there to be subheadings like this. If anyone disagrees with me I won't take offense if you revert this edit, but please include my comments here and any subsequent comments if you do
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BUNDLE)