Deletion of List Of ECW Originals in ECW (WWE)

Comment: or failing that, better to '''merge''' to ECW on Sci Fi|Extreme Championship Wrestling (WWE) than to keep, especially under this title with the parent brand name in paren's. Arguments in the nomination were mostly correct.  Fans will probably want to cite glossy magazine(s) that happen to be published by WWE's owners or shell companies, and aren't independent enough to pass |the guideline on reliable sources to meet the verifiability policy. This may be a season-long WWE/MTV plot to transfer a group of old veterans and get some story out of it; if so, the entertainment mags (yecch) will be covering it enough for tiny-edge-of-notability. If the described scene were real, we would have heard in the real world about Vince McMahon being hospitalized and perhaps buried; instead, his new golden boy got mobbed and thrown around.  From a Google search, I found that "prowrestlingblog.com" (not a ) has a 2006/06/29 article about McMahon taking more creative control over the ECW. The stuff described in the list that's nominated for deletion is part of a longer-term publicly-noted story about the takeover and McMahon's ways, but it's of low enough significance-within-topic to be worthy of merging, not a standalone article, under  or  or whatever guidelines you think should apply. (After edit conflict) Soltak is right, ECW Originals doesn't appear to need anything from this article, so I struck some of my comment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPORT||WP:FICT)