Deletion of 2016 Jerusalem shooting attack

Comment: Per  many  sources discuss this event not only as news but more thorough analysis for example http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/ANALYSIS-Many-unanswered-questions-remain-after-Jerusalem-attack-469805,http://www.timesofisrael.com/does-the-jerusalem-attack-signal-a-new-uprising
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: as per , I have expanded the article with sources and events that have taken place since the shooting.  (I have not yet added the excellent sources brought by User:Shrike above).  More remains to be added on details of the attack; political context, but article clearly passes  .  '''Note''' also that it is routine practice to add terror attacks when they occur
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN||WP:GNG)

Comment: per , , and . {{small|Yes, I know that NOTNEWS and NOTMEMORIAL indicate the "article" should be deleted, but I also know that the "article" will almost certainly be kept regardless of policy.}} —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per . This incident can be revisited in a year or so to see whether it meets Wikipedia:Notability_(events)#Inclusion_criteria, as can any of the many incidents of violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the various 'List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict' articles. A good Wikipedian would be willing to wait until there is actual evidence of lasting effects. I wasn't going to vote but I was persuaded to do so by E.M.Gregory's behavior, which I think is counterproductive. If the article is to be kept there is some background information on the shooter in http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=773482
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per , plenty of sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've waited for this attack to have some impact that distinguishes it from many other small incidents and it hasn't happened. No lasting impact = no article. It really is that simple. Also add  to the list of policy&guideline pages which are relevant. If this article is kept, one year from now the majority of Google hits for this event will be Wikipedia derivatives
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: per . No evidence that this event is of an enduring encyclopedic nature at this point. Redirect to List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, July–December 2016 per nom
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to List of violent incidents in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, July–December 2016. This is patent  material and is a routine attack. The amount of coverage is the same as other attacks of this type and we don't need to create a separate article for this. The lasting effects have not been shown and Wikipedia is neither a directory of attacks on Israel nor a directory of attacks on Palestine. There is nothing to distinguish this from say '''2016 killing of Palestinian woman at Tapuah Junction''' The arguments of  are invalid as it cannot trump . Accordingly redirect or delete. My redirect is essentially a compromise vote
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:HEY||WP:NOTNEWS)