Deletion of NAVGTR Awards

Comment: this article and all sub-articles on the individual awards. As alreadt stated several times, "significant coverage" as per  is not given, making the ceremony and the company behind it unnotable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: main article and merge all sub articles based on VentureBeat article which has depth and seems independent. {{re|Haleth}} Republished press releases are no more reliable than self-published press release; see discussion of churnalism at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:NEWSORG)

Comment: Here via the WT:VG post. The article topic lacks |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) Its hits in the /RS|video game reliable sources https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq custom Google search (including Masem's examples) are closer to churnalism in their lack of analysis of the actual event, so as sources for either the org or event, |are insufficiently independent for proving notability (). There are no worthwhile redirect targets and the smaller articles should have been bundled in this nomination. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{tl|ping}} me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:VG||WP:ORGIND)