Deletion of Chempaka by-election, 2015

Comment: The article is certainly not a violation of , which says that "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". This by-election is almost certain to take place and there is significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. A very quick google news search easily shows the plentiful coverage to establish notability - https://www.google.co.uk/#q=Chempaka+by-election&tbm=nws see this search. We cover by-elections to sub-national government bodies already such as :Category:Australian state and territorial by-elections and to describe a by-election as the sort of routine event  describes, is pretty impossible given the nature of by-elections
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWS)