Deletion of A Treatise on White Magic

Comment: This would appear to be one of Alice A. Bailey's more important and better known books.  A http://books.google.com/books?q=%22treatise+on+white+magic%22&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&um=1&lr=&sa=N&start=10 rudimentary Google Books search reveals multiple instances of substantial discussion and critical commentary by multiple, independent authors.http://books.google.com/books?id=1uTgYGT3quAC&pg=PA287&dq=%22treatise+on+white+magic%22&client=firefox-a#v=onepage&q=%22treatise%20on%20white%20magic%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=NoF_AAAAMAAJ&q=%22treatise+on+white+magic%22&dq=%22treatise+on+white+magic%22&client=firefox-ahttp://books.google.com/books?id=NYJ-AAAAMAAJ&q=%22treatise+on+white+magic%22&dq=%22treatise+on+white+magic%22&lr=&client=firefox-a.  Some of these writers are scholars researching the history of "channeling" and similar subjects.  Unfortunately, not enough excerpts of some of them are online to enable this article to be expanded immediately, but it fairly clearly meets the |books notability guideline.  The slippery slope argument and remarks about the texts being "telepathically dictated" would appear to indicate a scientism|scientistic or logical positivism|positivist |bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:BIAS)