Deletion of Social class in the Muslim world

Comment: I'm really concerned about the |novel synthesis aspects here. Whatever social structures are in place in Algeria are certainly unrelated to those among Muslim communities in India. I don't see anything in the references that suggests that the over-arching concept here "social class in the Muslim world" is a recognized topic. Rather, this is an assembly of bits about several different concepts. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise on this point, but if the sources exist to pull that off, I'd really like to see this sort of thing assembled in Draft or userspace before dumped in main; this isn't it. Separate articles on the interaction between Islam and existing social strata in various regional contexts are probably better-supported by the sources anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: per . I've seen a lot worse, and the synthesis can parts can be fixed. I think normal editing processes can fix the serious issues that have been raised
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per #CONTENT. This article was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_class_among_Muslims&oldid=105501331 originally about caste system among South Asian Muslims (which even https://www.britannica.com/topic/Islamic-caste Encyclopædia Britannica has an article on). The scope and content of the article was changed to cover the entire world relatively recently, and the page was moved accordingly by Metaphysicswar (who has since been blocked as a sockpuppet). The original topic has multiple books dedicated to it (e.g. https://books.google.com/books?id=lb7fjgEACAAJhttps://books.google.com/books?id=YRFuAAAAMAAJhttp://www.worldcat.org/title/basic-problems-of-obc-dalit-muslims/oclc/143331939http://www.worldcat.org/title/hindustan-men-zat-pat-aur-musalman/oclc/656153588https://books.google.com/books?id=Sdz9AAAAQBAJhttps://books.google.com/books?id=IToWAAAAIAAJ), and also finds a mention in hundreds of other books (e.g. https://books.google.com/books?id=qcYJAQAAIAAJhttps://books.google.com/books?id=dSzcaSf5vDsChttps://books.google.com/books?id=ZQ5lFywZAqYChttps://books.google.com/books?id=GC8-AAAAMAAJ). Not to mention journal/magazine articles (e.g. http://www.ijahs.com/view/sociological-perspectives-on-caste-among-muslims-in-india.pdfhttp://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/1962_14/7/muslim_caste_in_uttar_pradesh.pdfhttp://www.frontline.in/books/caste-muslims/article5914944.ece), government reports (e.g. http://ncm.nic.in/pdf/report%20dalit%20%20reservation.pdfhttp://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/the-muslim-obcs-and-affirmative-action/233259), and news articles (e.g. http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/muslim-intercaste-tension-surfaces-in-bihar/1049300/http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/mar/06bihar.htmhttp://www.ummid.com/news/2015/August/26.08.2015/cabinet-nod-to-add-muslim-castes-in-obc.htmlhttp://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/sunday-times/deep-focus/Being-Muslim-in-India-means-Syeds-spit-on-Julahas-in-an-egalitarian-community/articleshow/5935797.cmshttp://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/muslims-that-minority-politics-left-behind/article4821472.ecehttp://tribune.com.pk/story/290249/the-making-of-the-modern-maulvi--xiii/). I suggest moving the article back to its original title, and reducing its scope to the Indian subcontinent as before
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)