Deletion of Secret Double Octopus

Comment: Most of the sources within the article fail the criteria for establishing notability. References are either https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/42876 based https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/Pages/news/secret_octopus.aspx entirely https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-passwordless-authentication-co-secret-double-octopus-raises-15m-1001327007 on https://www.jpost.com/jpost-tech/israeli-startup-secret-double-octopus-raises-15-m-to-help-end-passwords-626595 funding https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3813870,00.html announcement(s) (failing ) or https://www.businessinsider.com/50-startups-to-boom-in-2018-according-to-vcs-2017-11?r=US&IR=T promotion by the VC (failing  - connected source). Two articles might meet the criteria. The first is an article commenting https://www.networkworld.com/article/3005839/this-companys-name-isnt-a-joke-secret-double-octopus-goes-beyond-encryption.html on their quirky company name but also includes information on the company. This is a weak reference but in my opinion meets the criteria. The most compelling reference is https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3287925/cool-vendors-in-communications-service-provider-security from Gartner Research and the table of contents shows that they were written about in detail. Analyst reports are specifically mentioned as meeting the criteria for establishing notability. I also note that at least one other technology analyst firm, Forrester Research, has also https://www.forrester.com/report/The+Forrester+Wave+IdentityAsAService+IDaaS+For+Enterprise+Q2+2019/-/E-RES144405 provided coverage of the company. As such there are sufficient references and the topic passes /
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)