Deletion of Donal O'Sullivan (priest)

Comment: between the news sources (Kerryman etc good), plus the two books, seems to satisfy NSOLDIER/GNG.  applies. I feel BLP1E would be a bit harsh - it's a fairly long time span. I would ask the various deletes to take a look at the sources and see if their !votes are still justified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per , the collected sources now available demonstrate notability per GNG. BLP1E does not apply as criterion 3 is not met: The Somme was a notable event, and O'Sullivan's role, while relatively minor, is well-documented. signed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: not notable for stand alone article; trivia. emorial applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)

Comment: Seems to pass  due to receiving "significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources." Although it could be argued this article is a little -y
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOLDIER||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: added some text sourced to Johnstone, Tom (1996). ''The Cross on theSword: Catholic Chaplains in the Forces.'' I haven't added everything listed above, but I do think that there has been enough  over many years to support notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)