Deletion of The Contender: The Game of Political Debate

Comment: The sources are admittedly weak but seem to pass . However, the article is heavily |POV and needs a through clean-up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)

Comment: for now) - considering the current lack of coverage in reliable sources and the article's blatant promotional tone throughout. Other similarly flawed articles should be cleaned up too, but are irrelevant for this discussion - see ther stuff exists. If the game gets some independent coverage in a few months, I suggest to create a new ''neutral'' non-promotional draft version and to ask for an AfC review. The entire article needs to be rewritten anyway to meet , as mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The references appear to be effectively press releases, which are not |reliable sources.  The fact that two out of three entities above !voting to keep are SPAs under sockpuppetry investigation further casts doubt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Not sure if I get to vote, but I am continuing to gather sources as coverage continues to pickup, I knew that it was early on and a little weak but did think as User:Non-dropframe already said that it looks to pass , as it looked that Cards Against Humanity passed that point as pointed out by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)