Deletion of International Climate Science Coalition

Comment: per . The coalition has been worthy of notice by several books (http://books.google.es/books?id=5SU7utP8PIMC&lpg=PA15&dq=%22International%20Climate%20Science%20Coalition%22%20-wikipedia&hl=es&pg=PA15#v=snippet&q=%22International%20Climate%20Science%20Coalition%22&f=false, http://books.google.es/books?id=tQYjQzOkYK0C&lpg=PA57&dq=%22International%20Climate%20Science%20Coalition%22%20-wikipedia&hl=es&pg=PA57#v=onepage&q=%22International%20Climate%20Science%20Coalition%22%20-wikipedia&f=false devote at least one page each, and there are many more search hits) and some or other news source (http://www.euronews.com/2009/12/08/challenge-issued-on-copenhagen-science/), and at least some mentions from (see http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22International+Climate+Science+Coalition%22 scholar search, although I have not evaluated the context of those
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  -- this is not |extensively or significantly covered in |reliable sources.  Mere passing mentions, done out of journalistic scruples, does not make this group anywhere close to notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: Here are a few sources I found from cursory searches, per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I am not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Does not meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORGDEPTH)