Deletion of Succès de scandale

Comment: article is a mess because it's a poor translation of the French article. I was going to say delete per , but, as a similar manner to ''schadenfreude'' it really has made its way into the popular lexicon outside of French and has no real English equivalent; as an expression it is used in headlines in ''https://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/22/bookend/bookend.html New York Times'', ''http://entertainment.time.com/2010/08/05/dead-tree-alert-work-of-arts-succes-de-scandale/ Time Magazine'';  and even ''http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/05/succes-de-scandale/ Tech Crunch'', and it's used in article context in ''http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/05/showgirls-20-anniversary-las-vegas Vanity Fair'' and ''http://www.wsj.com/articles/filthy-lucre-artist-darren-waterstons-double-vision-1430414844 Wall Street Journal''. These don't mean notability on their own but I think it should just tagged notability. I've never worked on an article about an expression before; if others see potential I'd be happy to TNT this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)

Comment: Per , weak writing is not an adequate reason to delete.  There's plenty more to pull together here such as ''Épater la bourgeoisie'', shock jock, :category:Obscenity controversies|obscenity controversies, Miley Cyrus, &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)