Deletion of Siegfried Marseille

Comment: As a general officer, he fits under criteria 3 of , and as an Iron Cross winner, he qualifies under criteria 1 of . I will note the delete arguments are basically trying to argue , but  says, "the remedy for such an article is cleanup, ''not'' deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: to Hans-Joachim Marseille and soft redirected there. If sources can be found to prove verifiability and notability, this page could be recreated, but based on the sources presented (and I looked for a while myself), the page should be deleted or merged to son's page. I've been wrestling with William F. Halsey, Sr. for a while after a similar deletion process. I can find sources, but can't find many sources directly detailing. Puts an editor in a position bordering on original research. I persist because I suspect I'll find something soon. Regarding , I'd like to add that during a recent military MOS discussion a user pointed out a major issue of disagreement between editors in that discussion: "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Military_history&action=historysubmit&diff=436754012&oldid=436717575 Essay needs improvement, specifically that Flag and General officers criteria should be dropped
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: per , flag officers are notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE)

Comment: According to  , receiving an iron cross is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE)

Comment: General officers are generally considered notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)