Deletion of Process Neo-Paganism

Comment: Appears to be original research under .  While it's clear from looking at some of the cited authors that process philosophy and process theology are being used/discussed in pagan/neo-pagan theological circles, and while that means there is "process paganism," that conclusion is synthesis. Other than that one blog post Other than one docstoc document, I don't see anyone outside of Wikipedia using the term "process paganism" specifically. We need citations of that term in use
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: Fails  with only a single self-published, two-paragraph source, and even that doesn't use the phrase, instead talking generally about how process theology can apply to paganism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As I stated in my PROD2 (now removed) and as has been stated here, while it is true that some prominent figures in neo-paganism are bringing elements of process theology into their examination of paganism, it does not appear to be the case that any of these figures (or anyone else, for that matter) has gone so far as to coin a new and widely used term "process neo-paganism". As such, this term appears to be  and not meriting a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)