Deletion of Stdlib.h

Comment: to C standard library#ISO_C_library_headers. The text in this article is high quality, different from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limits.h, which was not. That makes it more important to preserve the content somewhere, but the same argument applies. I'll rehash what I said there. #1 in  applies. While the specific phrases "how-to" and "owner's manual" don't adequately describe Stdlib.h, it belongs in a reference manual, not in an encyclopedia.  #8 in  also applies: "Wikipedia articles are not a complete exposition of all possible details. Rather, an article is a '''summary''' of accepted '''knowledge''' regarding its subject." Emphasis mine of course: knowledge includes facts but it's not just a litany of all available facts
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: Thats not correct - its not a single editor - there has been a lot of disagreement. Take a look at the talk pages Talk:C_standard_library#Pages_for_each_function_and_WP:NOTMANUAL, and the talk page of the nominater, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limits.h - the latter is a very insignificant header file compared to this one. The reason I recreated this article, thats because it was a redirect to C program control operations which is misleding if you want to know what stdlib.h is. If the new suggestion to redirect it to C standard library, the only infomation you get is: "For performing a variety of operations, including conversion, pseudo-random numbers, memory allocation, process control, environment, signalling, searching, and sorting.". The whole problem is, the articles has not '''been merged''' and therefore I disagree with your speedy redirect. And I have AFDed C miscellaneous operations - I think the way the headers has been split up is  and selfmade titles. E.g. I have not found a citation which states thats C mathematical operations is the functions in that article, but I have found a lot about plus and minus etc. I thought it was a good idea to merge a lot of the function which was the title of the discussion Talk:C_standard_library#Pages_for_each_function_and_WP:NOTMANUAL" but too late I (and probably) serveral other people recognized that it was about a new structure for the article, and the article was not merged as suggested) but just redirects to oneliners e.g. "{{man|sh|strncmp|SUS||inline}} - compares specific number of bytes in two strings" (yes (strncmp) was a poor article before, but now the redirect is useless - unless you want to leave wikipedia (the "merger" has included a lot of external links instead of mergeing the articles). Btw. the article Itoa the nominator says he couldnt fine a place to redirect, whats the solution to that - making it a redirect to C miscellaneous operations (without mergeing or mention the name of the redirect on the target
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I don’t think anyone suggested completely |deleting the contents and history from public view. There is potential for much of the content to overlap with things like C functions#stdlib.h, Standard C library#ISO C library headers, Null pointer, size_t, and the older div (C) and itoa pages, so perhaps merging, splitting, and redirecting should be discussed instead of deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:deleting)