Deletion of Annick Press

Comment: This particular publisher seems to have established a strong list of award winning authors.   is a guideline that outlines for us that just because X is associated with Y, and Y is notable, then X by mere association is not notable.  In the case of a publisher, it's notability is linked to the publications that it puts out, and the publisher isn't merely associated to the books and authors, having a stronger relationship and hand in the production of the book.  It's difficult to tell how deep the coverage is as the articles are behind pay walls, but http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/470463031.html?dids=470463031:470463031&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+08%2C+1989&author=Kathy+English+Toronto+Star&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=The+big+boom+in+children%27s+publishing+Canadians+are+making+their+mark+at+home+and+abroad+with+books+that+kids+love&pqatl=google, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/474648991.html?dids=474648991:474648991&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+13%2C+1985&author=Sherie+Posesorski+Special+to+The+Star&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=How+storyteller+Munsch+keeps+his+audience+spellbound&pqatl=google appear to indicate that they are notable enough to attract some press attention,and especially in the second abstract, it's clear that the success of Robert Munsch is being told framed with how it was achieved through this publisher
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I believe this publisher is |notable for the reasons I've given on the article's talk page; I'll be adding more citations as I find them.  I should note that much of the corroborating material has been added recently and was not present at the time of the |good-faith nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:AGF)