Deletion of University of Exeter Halls of Residence

Comment: having had look around this :Category:University and college residential buildings and :Category:University and college buildings I am even more disappointed at this nomination. We all have a deep and abiding knowledge of , WP is not run by precedent etc etc but I think that we should try to have a consistent approach to like pages. Taking one University at random, I looked at :Category:University of Pittsburgh buildings which contains wholly nn buildings such as Mervis Hall as well as several highly notable buildings. These cats would benefit from more omnibus articles pulling out what is actually important from buildings of lesser notability. The point I am making is that rather than randomly deleting one omnibus article the project would benefit from a holistic approach
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: and '''Comment''': I know it appears like this article is being singled out among University buildings, but I don't think that's the case in truth. It's been tagged with {{tl|notability}} since May 2007, which happens to be the month we're up to in working through the 15,000+ article :Category:Articles with topics of unclear notability|backlog over at ikiProject Notability|WikiProject Notability. If similar articles had been so tagged in that month, they'd probably be undergoing a similar evaluation. That said, I approve of having this sort of omnibus article, and I think that, in aggregate, a respectable and reliably sourced article can be written about these buldings
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)