Deletion of Bruce Haslingden

Comment: he has participated in the Olympics and there are sources to prove that. He most definitely had to have some success in his career to represent Australia in the Olympics. Subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I have expanded the article from sources. As the 1952 Winter Olympics was Australia's first Winter Olympics, he was a pioneering Winter Olympian. It is generally agreed that Olympic participation is sufficient for competing in the highest levels of the sport as specified by . It might be appropriate to merge with Australia at the 1952 Winter Olympics but there is strong sentiment for a standalone article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: For him to make it to the Olympics means he qualified somewhere... Which makes him nationally quite competitive. Meets  '''as it is currently written'''. He's at least as notable as Book Book, New South Wales|Book Book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per .  Coming in such a dismally low place in a single competition may not seem very notable to you or I, but the fact of the matter is he represented his country at the Olympics, and that alone satisfies one of the "special cases" : ''Competitors who have played or competed at the highest level in amateur sports.''  I have issues with "notability" because it is so ill-defined and subjective but in this case the guideline is pretty clear-cut
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per  and precedent of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lecomte. In the case of Lecomte, an Olympic athlete's article was kept merely because he was an Olympic athlete, even though not even his first name was known
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as per , he has competed at the highest level in his sport.  The guideline doesn't say "... and won stuff or came really close
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article is sourced (well, for a short article!) and passes , so I don't see much of a problem with Keep-ing it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per .  I am sure an Australian Olympian is more than just , which is the alternative in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Being selected to represent Australia at the Olympics is a sufficient proof of notability.  lists as one of its criteria: "Competitors who have played or competed at the highest level in amateur sports." Placing 74th does not take away from that accomplishment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)