Deletion of AnthillPro

Comment: or '''userfy''': I see no proper coverage to support the claims of |notability. Sources are blogs, a book about the genre of software (used in a manner that I'm not sure whether the book's author is aware of this software at all) and a news site frequently seen here (at AfD) as a last resort for non-notable stuff. Given that this situation is observed after 20 days of AfD, I see no hope for better sourcing in the near future. Hope the contributors would take time to improve the genre articles ''before'' asking to move this back. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: or '''userfy'''. Nearly all the citations are just descriptions of the product or new features added; from press releases and so forth. No actual demonstration of |notability, just |verification. The Gartner Award might have been significant, but I checked the page and there's dozens of "Cool Vendor" winners, possibly hundreds (most of whom don't have articles here either). And strictly speaking, the company won the award, not Anthill
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)