Deletion of Bahador Kharazmi (2nd nomination)

Comment: It meets qualifications for , , , ,  and  – Artist Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself and Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country. {{cite web|url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/seventhday/story/2006/11/061117_me_bahadorkharazmi.shtml|title= Bahador Kharazmi live in Dubai|publisher= bbc.co.uk|accessdate=2006-11-17}}{{cite web|title= Opening of Underground Concerts in Dubai|publisher=  B.B.C Persian |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/seventhday/story/2007/03/070319_me_dubaiundergrond.shtml|accessdate=2007-03-19}} Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. {{{cite web|title=Interview with B.B.C Persian 7th Day|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/arts/story/2005/01/050114_ag-bahador.shtml|publisher= bbc.co.uk|accessdate=2005-01-14}}{{cite web|title=Bahador Kharazmi: Prince of the Underground |url= http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ben-mirza/bahador-kharazmi-prince-of-the-underground_b_4760472.html|publisher=Huffington Post|accessdate=2014-02-17}} Artist is cited in reliable sources as being influential in style, technique, repertory or teaching for a particular music genre. Artist is also cited by reliable sources as having established a tradition or school in a particular music genre. {{cite web|title=Iranian Album Review|url=http://www.bia2.com/music-review/review.php?id=79|publisher=bia2.com}}  Concert tours are probably notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Such coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms.  and last but not least "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). . '''The sources are recognized as reliable and verifiable sources by Wikipedia guidelines''', News sources often contain both factual content and opinion content. "News reporting" from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact (though even the most reputable reporting sometimes contains errors). News reporting from less-established outlets is generally considered less reliable for statements of fact. '''Most newspapers also reprint items from news agencies such as BBC News, Reuters, Interfax, Agence France-Presse, United Press International or the Associated Press, which are responsible for accuracy.''' The agency should be cited in addition to the newspaper that reprinted it. . Given all the details and references inspired of Wikipedia Guidelines, based on the reliability, verifiability and neutrality of sources like BBC or Huffington Post, this artist is indeed considered as notable and meets the guidelines to be kept as an article on Wikipedia. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:NCONCERT||WP:COMPOSER||WP:IRS||WP:NEWSORG||WP:N||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:CONCERT||WP:IRS||WP:NEWSORG||WP:N)

Comment: Passes , ,  and  Artist is '''Notable''' - According to  Under General Notability Guidelines “If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.” Artist has received significant Published  coverage within multiple outlets such as Huffington Post and BBC which all under the guidelines are considered Significant, Reliable and Independent.  Questioning the credibility and reliability of Huffington Post or B.B.C would profoundly concern our good will and neutrality to follow Wikipedia guidelines as the contributor who has deleted the Farsi Wikipedia page has clearly questioned the reliability of BBC as a reliable source. A google search reveals that primary independent reliable sources have been picked up by hundreds of other websites which falls under  How accepted, high-quality reliable sources use a given source provides evidence, positive or negative, for its reliability and reputation. The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence. Sources are also considered verifiable under the RV. Although coverage was during a specific time period Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage. TEMP In addition the artist has been reviewed as the Iranian ambassador of underground music movement on Bia2.com  https://www.bia2.com/music-review/review.php?id=79, one of the main Iranian online entertainment channels. The artist has played iconic concert venues in Dubai and California which has been exclusively covered by BBC and he has been one of the important influencers of Iranian pop music. http://www.bbc.com/persian/seventhday/story/2006/11/061117_me_bahadorkharazmi.shtml In Conclusion I believe this artist '''should not be deleted''' as it does oblige to the necessary requirements of Wikipedia. It has also clearly demonstrated notability  as an artist who has received significant coverage in reliable sources  that are independent of the subject and clearly demonstrates necessary requirements needed for one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:PUBLISHED||WP:USEBYOTHERS||WP:N||WP:N||WP:PUBLISHED||WP:IRS||WP:USEBYOTHERS||WP:NRV||WP:NTEMP||WP:N||WP:IRS)