Deletion of CIA sponsored regime change

Comment: seems to be pretty much redundant and I agree completely with Bwithh when he pointed out that this article title is in itself heavily POV and violates #SOAPBOX
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as a POV fork of content already available in more  form elsewhere in the 'pedia, and per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: The page conveys a |point of view before one even opens it. The word "regime", while neutral in its dictionary sense, carries notions of repugnancy or totalitarianism. The central contention of the article - that the CIA were involved in the overthrow of a number of governments - is supported by numerous |reliable sources and I do not believe NPOV is a content problem with this subject as long as editors adhere to Wikipedia policies/pillars. The current content is suspect but cleanup is Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Problem_articles_where_deletion_may_not_be_needed|not a reason in itself for deletion - whacking a big "cleanup" tag on it and inviting editors to improve it is the answer to that problem. I wish I could think of a better title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS)

Comment: Proposal made in order to push a |POV and suppress another one. As the proposer states, ''he'' would accept  the article if it stated a ''different'' point-of-view. Being POV is not a criteria for deletion, but for improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Regardless of whether or not the CIA actively sponsored these movements, the very premise of this article appears to be hopelessly POV; fails . "Regime change" is also inadequately defined besides the POV issues. (The World Bank/IMF or even the United Nations could be said to actively sponsor regime change for instance under the vague criteria in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: Wikipedia already has more than enough magnets for left-wing POV. Such articles are walking, long-term, blatant demolitions of the entire  philosophy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)