Deletion of At Dawn (novel)

Comment: What can we say?  Utterly fails .  Is there anyone who can read  and honestly say that this insignificant novel actually satisfies the requirements for inclusion?  The answer, obviously, is no.  It's as simple as that.  The article must be deleted.  The argument that this non-notable book is somehow notable because its author used to be a ghostwriter is downright absurd.  BTW, everything put out by the New York presses gets reviewed in PW and Kirkus, so those reviews actually mean absolutely nothing when it comes to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:BK)

Comment: Under , reviews can establish notability. There are two reviews in independent sources. The problem is that the guideline goes on to say, "Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary." I'm not sure this is the case with these reviews, which are quite brief. The book does not satisfy any of the other criteria in . Hence delete unless and until more substantial coverage can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:BK)