Deletion of Robert I. Sherman

Comment: I looked only at the version of the article with the attacks removed. It should still be deleted; it is a classic example of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: My first reaction when reading this article was an unconscious mouse movement and near placement of a CSD G10 (Personal attack). This page, while sourced, is nothing more then an attack page. This is absolutely no  compliant article, and it certainly violates neutrality guidelines we have for BLP pages. As this page would indeed require a full rewrite i would suggest removing the page so it will start with a clean slate and a non attack history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per  Arbitration case of 2007 at: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff.  While it may be a broad interpretation of  to apply that core policy to a , I believe it fundamentally understandable that it applies to content as well as editors. I don't question that the possibility of a Robert I. Sherman article exists; however, this is not it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA||WP:BLP)