Deletion of Sharon Presley

Comment: An important libertarian feminist writer and co-founder of the Alliance of Libertarian Activists and Laissez Faire Books, Presley meets  through coverage in the http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=JiAqAAAAIBAJ&sjid=rSsEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4950,2172163&dq=sharon-presley&hl=en Milwaukee Sentinel and in http://books.google.com/books?id=61oY9P7RrmcC&pg=PA273&dq=Sharon+Presley&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vt21UqaONM3rkAes-oCgDQ&ved=0CE8Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=Sharon%20Presley&f=false A Generation Divided: The New Left, the New Right, and the 1960s. News archives and book searches also bring up numerous mentions of her and inclusions of her writings
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: while I am certainly sympathetic to the view that her academic actions are not notable, she does seem to satisfy  as Binksternet has pointed out.  She may not be particularly notable for being an academic, but as an individual she meets the standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per Xxanthippe. A handful of citations doesn't make someone notable. Please read  carefully before !voting here. If we would treat academic citations the same as coverage in a newspaper, then 2 would suffice for notability. In that case, all of my undergraduate students would be notable, too. I'm going to '''neutral''' per my reasoning below in the next section. (Yep, "section", that's how much this AfD got out of hand
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: per . The Klatch book already used as a reference discusses the life choices, experiences and views of Presley quite a bit, offering them as examples on pages 51–52, 69–70, 82, 84, 93, 118, 150, 152, 162, 269, 273, 286, 296 and 307. A book which is not yet used as a reference is Rita Mae Kelly's ''Gender and Socialization to Power and Politics''. Kelly talks about Presley in the book's introduction, http://books.google.com/books?id=8XYjmv7sM9cC&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7 devoting two paragraphs to a study by Presley and her co-authors about Mormon feminism. ''Reason'' magazine interviewed her and put the video on their website as http://reason.com/reasontv/2012/05/26/sharon-presley-on-libertarian "Sharon Presley on Libertarian Feminism". AOL and Huffington Post also hosted this same video. Joan Kennedy Taylor says that Presley was very influential to Taylor's career, through her role in the Association of Libertarian Feminists (''Reclaiming the Mainstream'', page 7, {{ISBN|0879757175}} ). Taylor also cites Presley's works "Government is Women's Enemy" and "Suzanne LaFollette". Author John F. Welsh writes about Presley's introduction to ''The Anarchists'', spending a paragraph of his book http://books.google.com/books?id=GS82AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA125 ''After Multiculturalism'' on her ideas. Professor Jennifer Burns discusses Presley in ''Goddess of the Market'', saying she was "one of the few women to become active in the libertarian movement" and thus was a standout example.http://books.google.com/books?id=z6e9X6JxHpMC&pg=PA200 These sources show that Presley has influence, has been cited, has had her ideas analyzed and quoted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The argument by those in favour of deleting seems to be that she does not meet .  My question is this: can you please explain to us how she does not meet the criteria of GNG?  By my reading of GNG, in combination with the sources provided by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article has no real assertion of notability. As far as I can tell, WorldCat holdings are very small. The source list is problematic too. Many fall far short of , for example her CV, various websites, etc. The length of the source list is very misleading because there's lots of repetition. The Milwaukee Journal source seems solid, but I don't think that the list collectively satisfies the bar of having multiple, non-trivial sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I don't see anything here that would meet . If all we can write about her is that she went to college, worked as an adjunct professor, helped open a bookstore and was a member of an organization... well, yeah, that's not the stuff of an encyclopedic biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)