Deletion of Case no. 16CV300

Comment: The article does not indicate how this court case is notable per , that is, which reliable sources such as national news organizations have given it substantial (not only passing) coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources given, are to peachcourt.comm that requires a login to read - I cannot comment on what is hidden behind the login, the 3 references to an a server without a name is not a  - I cannot associate it with anyone that could be reliable, the other references predate the legislation that this case is about - so cannot be used to establish this case as notable. Most court cases are known by the the names of the litigants involved rather than a court assigned number which makes searching for coverage hard to do - you might want to put that in the article as it would help anyone reviewing this try to find significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:reliable source)