Deletion of List of politicians with economics training

Comment: far too vague. . It would be impossible to verify if someone took a high school economics course and yet there's probably many politicians who have, and are very competent. Someone might go to business school and take a few courses in economics, while someone else might not. This list could easily degenerate into a platform for "my candidate is smarter than your candidate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: per , specifically point #7 about non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations.  In addition, this list is almost entirely unreferenced and woefully incomplete.  This is not necessarily a reason for deletion on its own, but the omission of a politician from this list implies that he/she has no training in economics, which is a problem.  There is no clear definition of what constitutes "economics training".  Does that mean they need to have an advanced degree in economics, or would it suffice to have read a book on economics?  I think that if you dig hard enough, you'll find that the vast majority of politicians have ''some'' sort of formal or informal training in economics (since it's part of almost every politician's job), it might be easier to create the shorter List of politicians without economics training
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)