Deletion of Cloud9 (team)

Comment: Covered extensively in reliable sources independent of the subject.  http://www.playboy.com/articles/winners-losers-and-legends Playboy http://www.ongamers.com/articles/the-history-and-formation-of-cloud-9-part-1-of-the-cloud-9-story/1100-1302/ OnGamers  Even teams which haven't been covered to this degree should probably be kept, and notability guidelines should more closely follow  which is more almanac-y in nature than other video game guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)

Comment: I spot checked a few of the references, and many of these are extremely trivial passing mentions. For example, https://uk.news.yahoo.com/gfinity-uk-esports-arena-pictures-inside-britains-first-170436208.html#LFUOQgS this Yahoo source listed above is extremely short, and only mentions the name Cloud 9 - nothing else - in the article. That's not ''significant coverage'', so that source wouldn't go towards proving it meets the . Still undecided personally, just wanted to encourage people to look closely at the source, and don't just assume there's enough coverage because someone blasted a huge list of sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)