Deletion of Alexander K. Tyree

Comment: I don't see that  is even close to being satisfied here. What has been added are a photo; the book The Washingtons that apparently covers his early life and is unavailable online; 3 minor newspapers that are unavailable online unless you have a newspapers.com subscription; Silent victory: the U.S. submarine war against Japan also inaccessible online which is only a source for details about his much more famous brother; and then more from Hall of Valor which is debatable as an RS. The original inacessible newspaper article (presumably an obituary given the date) remains as do fleetorganisation.com and navsource which are both blogs. I don't see any of these as providing the necessary indepth coverage required for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Two Navy Crosses (second-level awards) is clearly enough for notability per  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: thanks to awards and the coverage in ''Bowfin''.  Have I seen ''Bowfin''?  Yes.  Libraries are pretty good things, right?  You can borrow for an hour, or join the waitlist for a full-length lending period thanks to the great Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/bowfinstoryofone0000hoyt Link.  The first three pages introducing the main text are pretty much dedicated to him.  Later, you won't have any content in Chapters 8, 9, and 10 if you remove him.  Do I think anyone will get a full-length loan?  No.  This seems pretty pointy as others have stated.  Will I add any content from the source?  No, the source S, so the article should be kept.  There appear to be parties interested in improving the article here, so I hope the link is useful to them.  Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: The article was nominated for deletion when it had only one sentence in it plus an infobox.  It is now a full article.  This person won the Navy Cross twice, and winning a notable award makes anyone notable. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per  and the two Navy Crosses
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: If it were just one Navy Cross I could understand and would possibly agree. He was awarded the Navy Cross multiple times. There are several wikipedia pages of military fighter Aces with less than ten kills, nothing close to the Navy Cross in terms of awards and ranks below that of of Colonel or Captain(Navy). If this page is deleted because it fails notability, then I will also nominate those pages because in terms of notability they are simply less notable. In my opinion the standards are unclear, but a multiple winner of the US's second highest award is notable. If the Navy Cross was awarded twice to any sailor in modern times they would surly be considered notable. IAW  a person is notable if "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." He won the Navy Cross multiple times, to delete the page one would have to argue that the Navy Cross in not either well known or significant, which simply isn't the case. I think there should be a clear cut standard for notability for military biographical pages. Is an Ace notable? Is a multiple winner of the Navy Cross notable enough? Is a General Officer notable? These questions should be clear cut, I am tired of trying to contribute what I feel follows wikipedia's guide lines, only to have all my work deleted and have to constantly defend its existence. Until things are more clearly defined in way of notability I will refrain from contributing in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: He went on to become a maths professor and so there is clearly scope to expand the article and policy  therefore applies, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)