Deletion of Mindtree (3rd nomination)

Comment: i agree with user czarkoff but @Dwaipayan "13,000 employs" where you get that data from? didn't you noticed that "citation needed" tag beside that self proclaimed number? This article has been nominated 2 times before and this is the 3rd time, i can definitely feel some conspiracy going on here. Please have a look at ,  and finally 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B||WP:PROMOTION||WP:BEANS)

Comment: On just the merits of the article, I agree with Dwaipayan that there is coverage out there for this company to meet . The BSE and NSE listings don't give it automatic notability; the coverage in media sources does. On the merits of the nomination, Science.Warrior has not presented a case for the article having such deep flaws in its ''content'' that it can't be cleaned up. Editors with conflicts of interest are not prohibited from editing articles; they're discouraged to do so and encouraged to strongly source everything. The article is not hopeless spam, and COI is a situation better dealt with by cleanup than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per . I can't find sources that would satisfy . The tone of the article suggests that redlink would be an easier start for proper article if valid sources are ever found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B||WP:CORPDEPTH)