Deletion of Left-wing conspiracy

Comment: At best . Some POV, some OR, and a quote from an unreliable blog. Nothing worth saving here. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: I wanted to add that I see potential for an article to exist with a  perspective so I also added . The claims of "Left-wing conspiracy" http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/13/tory-officials-threatened-bbc-miliband-tom-baldwin-licence-fee UK http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/189119#.VWOF31VViko Israel and "right-wing conspiracy" http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/mystery-of-dead-briton-and-the-rightwing-cult-1912336.html UK http://www.agoravox.tv/actualites/politique/article/la-cagoule-enquete-sur-une-43412 French (''conspiration d’extrême droite'') are used around the world. An encyclopedic article about both terms has potential. Someone who is Laziness|not me would have to see if there's enough coverage of it directly to meet GNG. Also, the phrase "Vast left-wing conspiracy" is used frequently now, usually in opinion pieces. I can see that article existing if there was a way for it to be neutral coverage of the term, and not just baseless accusations by bloggers about the Clintons and MSNBC and the Stonecutters or whoever
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:WORLDVIEW||WP:TNT)

Comment: fails ; appears to be set up to defame Democracy Alliance, only sources are blogs. "Vast right-wing conspiracy" seems to have specific notability as a unique phrase thanks to the "vast
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)