Deletion of Carl Thorvald Andersen

Comment: leaning '''week delete'''. First of all, do not search for '''{{mono|Carl Thorvald Andersen}}''', there is almost nothing to be found. Search for '''{{mono|C. T. Andersen}}''' (use alt. search term). Andersen's ouvre is well described, and as such you could argue a "keep" vote pursuant to #4, as does the good
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: that #4.  REcognizes notability on the basis of leaving a body of work that is notable.  This is the rubric under which we keep articles on creative professionals of all kinds without requiring sources beyond documentation of the notable (painting, poem, design) work created. My argument here is that the group of Andersen buildings designated notable / historic by Denmark constitute such a body of work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: meets . Sourcing & scope are acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: as per |CSD criterion A7. Has no references, and next to no information as how he is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7)

Comment: because he squeaks past , other and better sources may turn up, and unlike so very many biographees of whom similar comments could be made, he's been dead for a century, there's been no muttering about promotional editing, and a future descent into advertising is very hard to imagine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)