Deletion of Samuel Sears

Comment: The article as it was before the nominator and a previous editor committed major surgery on it was clearly over-promotional. However, a quick glance through GScholar seems to give the subject an h-index of about 28, which in most fields would be taken as fairly strong evidence of meeting #1. Though (particularly seeing the amount of multiple authorship in the subject's publications) I am willing to be told I am wrong
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)