Deletion of Lil Eazy-E

Comment: to his father's page. Fails  but may be worthy of mention
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: He "has an album coming this year?" So? Familiarize yourself with  and, more importantly, . He can't have his own article yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Could you explain that, please? For instance, how does Eazy-E violate ? Also, using unnecessary profanity isn't the best way to get your point across
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: It's not that it's a stub—it's that he fails the |notability guidelines for music; it's that simple. "After the release of his albums" he ''may'' meet notability (if the record charts or if he gets a hit single, for example). Then, and only then, should the article be re-created
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: A common argument from the "Keep" crowd is that he will one day be notable, therefore this article should not be deleted. This is not a valid argument. A person has to be notable before the article is created, not become notable afterwards. He's a musician who hasn't even released an album! He is not yet notable!  sets the threshold for notability at two albums released on a major (or important indie) label. He simply doesn't pass notability guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: If the article "eventually comes back" as the above user suggested, that will be fine; provided he is notable. But currently this article does not pass the notability guideline set by , and therefore should be deleted. As I suggested above, it could redirect to his father's page, and mention of him could be made there. But this is a pretty cut and dry issue: he is a musician who does not pass . Until he does, he can't have his own article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)