Deletion of Thomas Fox (1622–1666)

Comment: and |a trout to the nominator while we're at it. MPs are inherently notable, if you don't like that it's a short stub then fix it. I don't give a damn whether all the creators "articles I've started" contain one line each. We're BUILDING an encyclopedia, so if you're irked by a short article then make it longer. Simples
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: These MPs are inherently notable, and many of the articles above have at least one seemingly reliable source to satsify . If any of these fail , I think they should be userfied instead of deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)