Deletion of Michael Ferns (2nd nomination)

Comment: Passes . Schmidt did great work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The article has certainly been greatly diminshed since it survived the last AFD,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Ferns&action=history and I will report back after expanding and sourcing it myself per what's available in seaches. A couple quick notes... ''Sterling Observer'' is simply the Stirling area edition of Scottish & Universal Newspapers Limited (AKA Trinity Mirror, Britain's biggest newspaper group and publisher of  240 regional papers as well as the national ''Daily Mirror'', ''Sunday Mirror'' and ''The People|People'', and the Scottish ''Sunday Mail (Scotland)|Sunday Mail'', the Scottish ''Daily Record (Scotland)|Daily Record'', and ''Dumfries & Galloway Standard''), and it is to be expected that they would cover topics in their area.  In depth articles in '''the''' newspaper expected to cover that area is fine. Notable to Scotland is perfctly fine to en.Wikipedia, and we do not expect worldwide acclaim for a topic deterninable as notable to Scotland. And that BAFTA choses to recognize new talent does not lessen the accolade or its sourcable notability.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22BAFTA+New+Talent+Awards%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbm=nws&ei=VJTyTovXMsqpiQKR9viHDg&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=4&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAw Lots of comepetion and very few making it through the gauntlet. The award is itself notable as it is an award ONLY for newcomers, not those long establisahed in the industry... established filmmakers have other means of recoginition. We have a demonstrably notable award bestowed by a notable organization and specifically set to recognize New Talent (I am reminded of Young Artist Awards). This meets the criteria of being a notable award per ... and ANYBIO does not state that awards specifically intended to award only New Talent are somehow disqualified from meeting its criteria. I'll be back once the article has been rebuilt
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: re-written article. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Ferns&diff=prev&oldid=467069083 one sentence when nominated. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Ferns&action=historysubmit&diff=467581745&oldid=467069083 35x expansion and improvement. No more copyvio. BAFTA Scotland IS the Scottish branch of BAFTA, and as an award from a notable organization, specifically designed to be awarded to New Talent, is an accolade he will never get again... as he is now no longer ''new'' talent. That BAFTA Scotland awards Scottish filmmakers in a separate awards ceremony from the main BAFTA awards, underscores notability of the award to Scotland... and with his receiving a well-known and significant award or honor (To Scotland),  is met. ANYBIO does not demend nor require the award be world-wide... and notable to Scoltland is fine for en.Wikipedia. And in looking at , his short films have received quite modest attention but his feature film debut ''Kirk'' has received enough recognition and commentary for him to meet CREATIVE. Again, there is no mandate that a film receiving significant critical attention be world-wide in that attention. And beyond coverage of this fellow in the ''Stirling Observer'', M. J. Simpson's review of the film is quite in-depth in its analysis of the film and praise of the young filmmaker... so we do have more than just ''one'' source speaking about this fellow and his work. We'll doubtless hear even more about Ferns when he gets old enough to leave home.  The article is now one that serves the project and its readers and will be continually improved over time and through regular editing as his career grows
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE)