Deletion of Mucoid plaque (3rd nomination)

Comment: as a separate article, or (second choice) as a '''redirect'''.  There is enough material from |“reliable sources” for at least a brief article.  And this isn't merely nonsense; it's ''important'' nonsense which can be actively harmful, can divert people from proper treatment, and is exchanged for significant amounts of money
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I'm convinced that it's a fringe idea only believed in by cranks and quacks, but there seems to be enough reliable material from organisations dedicated to debunking potentially harmful fringe ideas like this for the subject to pass .  I respect where the nominator is coming from, I just don't agree
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Yes there are sources. But there are very few ''good'' sources, which makes it hard to write a |balanced and neutral article.  If the article is kept, I ask that those voting "keep" reciprocate by putting the article on their watchlist to help us rein in the ongoing promotion of this hoax. DGG, Guy, others -- will you help us
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT)

Comment: Well written, balanced, well sourced article which meets  benchmark. I see no reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: there are all these easily found mentions in published sources http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=%22mucoid+plaque%22&btnG=Search+Bookshttp://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22mucoid%20plaque%22&sa=N&tab=pshttp://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?tab=pn&q=%22mucoid+plaque%22&ie=UTF-8   I loathe it to death of course, but it passes  due to having sufficient mentions in books by well known presses etc.  We should have it here so we can debunk it for those people that hear of it.  Having an article doesn't mean we endorse, au contraire, we can damn it rightfully and with reliable sources backing us up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: please please please. This will never be a decent encyclopedia article, because the profile of this "disease" is so low that there are few or no good sources. If this article is kept, then I would like to ask the keep !voters to all watchlist the article. It is consistently patrolled by an agenda account, {{user|Heelop}}, dedicated to promoting this concept, so just maintaining it is kinda painful. More eyes would help, though I still think this fails  and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)