Deletion of Ferdinand Ashmall

Comment: I agree that the single source IS a |reliable source but it's still a single source. That doesn't qualify as |notable. OTOH, I learned a new word from this article, "necronym", so it's not a total loss. But what the heck is a "secular Catholic Priest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: does not seem to meet . Only possibly signifiant coverage I see is the Hynes piece. Which incorrectly, if any of this is true at all, gives his death age (aka-"reach" age, max age, final age...) as 104, the most important (to some) piece of information about him, they apparently got wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources help it to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly notable in many reliable archives and peer-reviewed literature, and passes  and  by a mile. Referenced in many books (https://books.google.com/books?id=sPUBAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA57&ots=urNLm10Fft&dq=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&pg=PA57#v=onepage&q=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&f=false,https://books.google.com/books?id=MukGAAAAYAAJ&lpg=RA1-PA400&ots=3Ntdgxwpjg&dq=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&pg=RA1-PA400#v=onepage&q=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&f=false,https://books.google.com/books?id=EhcHAAAAQAAJ&lpg=PA387&ots=3XS9RKlbdH&dq=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&pg=PA388#v=onepage&q=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&f=false,https://books.google.com/books?id=34lNsEFcProC&lpg=PA139&ots=6_DC2OrEUx&dq=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&pg=PA140#v=onepage&q=%22Ferdinand%20Ashmall%22&f=false), as well as national and university archives (http://reed.dur.ac.uk/xtf/view?docId=ead/ush/ucoldmisc.xml,http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/rd/6cf79a56-8231-4d0e-8c6e-210b8112a32e). This article is a clear keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPEOPLE)