Deletion of List of proposed cities for American football minor leagues

Comment: here's my problem with it... "I propose that Kackley, Kansas should be the home of the next *FL team."  Now, based on the article title and criteria, we need to include this wide spot in the road (no offense to the handful of fine people who live in or near Kackley).  It's just too broad of a list.  I believe this is beyond just an "editing" issue and the encyclopedia will be better off removing this article.  Enthusiastic editors should start over with a more refined definition and inclusion criteria or not have the article at all.  Personally, I found the subject and detail interesting, but "I like it" is not a measure for notability.   There seems to be a good number of sources for individual entries in the list so it's been "discussed" but I'm not convinced that this broad of a topic and this large of a list is in alignment with the article and the broad potential inclusion.  Many such "proposals" could be considered an "and finally" type article or just a passing mention.  I guess I'm landing on |ignore all rules because deletion would make Wikipedia better.  Perhaps editors should |try another wiki such as an online sports almanac, fan blog, or other forum
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:TRYANOTHER)

Comment: Fails  (no sources found showing that the topic "has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources") and  (lack of significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources). Nominator's concerns with  also appear to be well-taken
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:GNG||WP:OR)