Deletion of Konig's Westphalian Gin

Comment: I've seen the latest expansions and sources for the article, yet none of it (except the new ad image, again not a reliable source) is specifically about the subject, which is the product Konig's Westphalian Gin. I don't see any significant coverage of it, nor how it is notable per . Note: my understanding is that people are supposed to identify themselves as interested parties in these deletion discussions: both Edwardx and Philafrenzy are creators of this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It can be quite hard to find genuinely independent coverage of modern products, let alone something this old. And in some ways it is the over-the-top advertising that makes it particularly notable. After all, the product was probably not much different to any other gin. As always, we need to beware the dangers of . The idea of renaming it to "Konig's Westphalian Gin (advertising)" is wholly unnecessary - no one is likely to believe the claims, even if the article were not to comment on them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)