Deletion of Cyber Chess

Comment: creator) Both author and product are http://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/William+Tunstall-Pedoe included on the Chess Programming wiki. Mentioned in http://wordsmith.org/anagram/article-globeandmail.html article at The Globe and Mail (although admittedly not the actual topic of that piece) and in notes of a http://www.btinternet.com/~glencom/199907.htm PC users' group meeting. Noted http://nave.iconbar.com/forums/viewthread.php?threadid=11574 in this forum post - yes I know it's not . The game received media coverage in related press at the time of its release. It's now ''almost 20 years old'', which explains why there are few online references. This does not mean that further sources (in printed magazines) do not exist. The article was nominated for deletion within a week of its creation: other editors have not had a chance to add further sources yet. I've now tagged it with {{tl|Refimprove
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WP:Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia|Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no reason such articles should be excluded for being "unremarkable" per !votes from RadioFan and Mtking above. The article as it stands meets , although I accept that it's desirable to improve it by adding additional refs. Such refs cannot easily be added by inexperienced editors if the article is deleted, userfied or incubated. (Experienced editors could of course state their source(s) at , but that's ''not'' an ideal situation for newcomers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:UNDELETE)

Comment: unremarkable software, I'm not finding sufficient coverage in 3rd party sources to help this meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)