Deletion of Esther Reed

Comment: The subject has received significant media coverage for her actions from reliable sources both inside and outside the United States. Perhaps  needs to be more specific on cases like this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Lots of people commit identity fraud, however, this one received international recognition and was featured on http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/29/48hours/main3553118.shtml CBS's 48 Hours, http://www2.amw.com/fugitives/brief.cfm?id=42967 AMW, and the Secret Service's Top 10 Most Wanted. She was also written about in a section about student load fraud in a book about identity theft:http://books.google.com/books?id=TzJZXIoo4tIC&pg=RA1-PA50&dq=%22Esther+Reed%22+-inpublisher:icon+fraud&as_brr=0#v=onepage&q=%22Esther%20Reed%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon%20fraud&f=false.  Therefore, the coverage appears to be significant and persistent enough to meet , , and Wikipedia:N/CA and thus override /1E. Since the criminal act(s) and the criminal are essentially one and the same here, I don't think Wikipedia:Notability (criminal_acts)#Perpetrators|perp section of WP:N/CA really applies. I agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: She "has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." I agree it is not the greatest article for WP but she does meet . If historical significance was our test for notability than we would not need  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PORNBIO||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: for pretty much the same reasons as Miriam Sakewitz (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Sakewitz|AFD). This seems to fall afoul of  and . I see no evidence that there has been any ''biographical'' coverage of this person in reliable third-party sources, as opposed to coverage of specific criminal activities of which she has been accused. Unless someone can show independent treatment of this person as a biographical subject, we should not do so, since that would violate |the policy against original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NOR)