Deletion of Rockvale academy

Comment: Complete fail at following . Formatting messed up, including no independent references of any kind, while its given source is in a irregular format. Notability is very questionalble, a http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Rockvale+Academy Google News Archives search brought up only three mentions, all of of which are from the same publication. If it were to be notable, it requires a substantial rewrite to meet Wikipedia's policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The article is filled with irrelevant bits of information and it is written in an extremely |non-neutral way; it should be rewritten from scratch, to get an article that complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: This is a school at the level of a U.S. high school; it's a boarding school; and it apparently has spawned a university. All of those attributes imply inherent notability. The database at http://www.cisce.org/ confirms the recognized status of the school and the basic information about it. Google News results may be limited, but I find many ghits in a regular Google search, including http://kalimpongreview.com/schools.aspx, http://www.bhutantimes.bt/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=685&Itemid=44, http://www.darjeelingtimes.com/news/News/Morcha-chief-to-skip-tripartite-talks.html, http://kalimpongsciencecentre.com/events.htm, http://kalimponghimalayantimes.blogspot.com/, and others. Not all of these are , but some are. Also, most provided insubstantial coverage, but they deal with a diverse variety of aspects of this school, and overall impression is of a notable institution. As for the article content, the article needs substantial cleanup, but it's not a hopeless case. (I made a few initial cleanup edits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I couldn't help but notice that the 2 "delete" !votes in this discussion seem to be arguing for a re-write. |Blow it up and start over is an interesting essay on this concept but it's not a policy or guideline. If it can be re-written then it should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)