Deletion of ServerBeach

Comment: There's non-trivial press coverage about the company outside that event from a half-a-dozen different sources http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-135625605/serverbeach-continues-expand-s.html http://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2006/05/29/daily14.html  http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/pee100504 http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2006/09/07/serverbeach-moves-into-larger-data-center/ http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/083109_ServerBeach_Goes_Offline_After_Outage http://www.serverwatch.com/hreviews/article.php/3577981/Hardware-Today-ServerBeach-Plays-Ball-With-Dell.htm http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/CDN/News.asp?id=36607 http://www.isp-planet.com/hosting/2003/serverbeach.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-132202343.html http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/4847/1/, mentioned alone on CNN http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/17/technology/business2_bulletproof_phasetwo/index.htm; also mentioned together with Rackspace http://oreilly.com/pub/a/etel/2006/05/02/building-teleconference-system-with-asterisk-and-gizmo.html?page=1 on O'Reilly. Satisfies  and it's more notable than the average hosting company too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  none of the above references are significant enough for WP's notability standards. It needs coverage such as CNNs but on the company, not just mentioning it, while local and specialist coverage should also be disregarded. As it is there's nothing to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)