Deletion of Building a Better Legal Profession

Comment: The group may no longer exist but it was notable in its time with WP:SIGCOV in the NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/us/29bar.html?em&ex=1193803200&en=67388bf4d2937143&ei=5087%0A, and ''Los Angeles Times'' (see article), and WSJ https://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/04/03/you-say-you-want-a-big-law-revolution/, and ''CBS'' https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-guns-fuel-bloody-mexican-drug-wars/, heavy referencing in the ''Stanford Law Review'' https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2010/04/BruckCanter.pdf (and other journals).  I'm continuing to add more references, but at least technically passes . No need to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  by {{ping|Britishfinance}} sourcing is sufficient to demonstrate notability and quality improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)