Deletion of General list of masonic Grand Lodges (2nd nomination)

Comment: as per nom.  In addition, the vast majority of the Grand Lodges listed in the article (''including'' most of the so called "mainstream" Grand Lodges) do not meet the criteria for notability given at #Non-commercial organizations.  As is repeatedly stated at , the notability of an organization must be established by reliable secondary sources that are independant of the subject.  In the case of the vast majority of Masonic Grand Lodges, the ''only'' sources that exist are self-published. There are lots of sources that discuss Freemasonry ''as a whole'', but hardly any that discuss individual Grand Lodges.   This means that the article is essentially a list of non-notable entities
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I wasn't going to wade in here as I didn't really have anything original to say, but I thought I would look at MSJ's reasoning.  Firstly  can not apply here at all. None of the categories could reasonably apply to this article.  I'm not sure why such a weak argument was put forward.   is a bit stronger.  I went through the various examples and the only one that could conceivably apply is the third "Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business" or "yellow pages".  This is not met as the only contact details are the websites (there are no phone numbers or addresses) and these are incidental to the list.  So I think under the terms of the nomination the deletion fails
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)