Deletion of Missy Owens

Comment: per  and  failure. Not notable at this time. Her uncle is president-elect. More exposure may follow sometimes after her uncle becomes president -for good and bad this is my experience- but notability should be data-driven, not automatic. Right now I do not see the sources. If someone here takes a special interest in Owens, I'm also fine with '''draftification''' and certainly with a '''redirect''' to the family page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and a case example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: She hasn't held any political roles that would make her "inherently" notable under , and notability is |not inherited, so she isn't automatically special just because of who her uncle is either. So the only valid basis for notability here would be that she passed  on the sourcing — but the sources here are not substantively ''about her'', and instead comprise a mix of |primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage of her uncle. That's not how you reference a person as notable enough for inclusion here: we require |reliable source media coverage that has her and her work as its ''primary subject'', not just any page on the web that happens to have her name in it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: per ,  failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)