Deletion of Katie Bouman

Comment: I don't know that "her story needs to be told" is a justification for a WP article.  is pretty clear; even the sources like the https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/science/katie-bouman-black-hole.html NYT note that the press coverage she's received is of outsize significance to her actual role in the project. If this ultimately does pass muster, it will be more due to press/social media celebrity, which again, is not necessary indicative of notability if it is not 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: as the subject meets . With regard to BLP1E concerns, it was held recently in the AfD discussion about Saikat Chakrabarti that coverage of other aspects of the person's like (which our article on her details a fair bit of) satisfied those concerns even if the coverage was in news stories otherwise about the "1E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per nom. The subject meets neither of  or . If an article about the actual discovery exists or is created, they can be mentioned, but there is no justification for this spin-off
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)