Deletion of Creation geophysics

Comment: Creationism is, of course, |complete bollocks, but this "article" raises it to a new level, combining a small number of post-hoc rationalisations based on cherry-picking of genuine scientific findings. Creationism and geophysics are orthogonal. That is all you need to know. Per policy, the article is a mix of |novel synthesis, non sequitur and |unreliable sources. It's telling that none of the sources claims to be about creation geophysics. Geophysics and creationism are two subjects with pretty much no intersection
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BALLS||WP:SYN||WP:RS)

Comment: Contra the nom, it's fairly clear that "Creation geophysics" means statements made about geophysics by "Creation science" advocates. This may be , but it's spectacularly notable. There is no shortage of critical sources.  In fact  specifically mentions "Creation science" topics as examples of notable topics. The relationship with the Flood geology article is discussed on this article's talk page. -- Special:Contributions/101.117.30.180|101.117.30.180
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NFRINGE)