Deletion of Aubrey Burl

Comment: insufficient third party coverage to establish notability. If he has "multiple well-known books" then the article should be sourcable to  ''reviews'' of these books rather than the  works themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: DGG said it, the subject easily passes both  and  with explicitly stated claims to notability mentioned in the article and supplied with references. Extensive newscoverage of his work in conventional newsmedia, as googlenews search shows, as well as a book honoring his work (item 2 in the references section
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: per all of the above. As well as passing  I think he passes  with his many books, several of which have multiple published reviews that are now linked from our article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTH)