Deletion of Bangladesh–Rwanda relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: mdash; There isn't clear |general notability of these relations as far as being substantial enough for a standalone article, and there's plenty of space and convention for this in the existing article.  While several others have cited that this is a stub, an actual stub implies that there's the ability to expand it with significant amounts of content that ''already is'' available. That does not seem to be the case here; this seems to be all there is for now (which is an issue of ). As a side note, a year's delay is more than sufficient for a re-nomination, even moreso when the first AfD was a ''non-admin closure with small turnout
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: We already had a nomination this year and the result was ''Keep''.   states "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome.''" and implicitly suggests that the nominator be blocked in such cases.  As for the topic, no-one seems to have noticed that Bangladesh sent the largest contingent of troops to Rwanda to keep the peace after the genocide.  This seems quite significant and there are certainly plenty of sources which cover this in detail such as https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rhsRrxZtJwMC&pg=PA87 this.  Q.E.D
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELAFD)