Deletion of Plant A Tree Today Foundation

Comment: It looks as if enough coverage has been identified to clear the bar of , even if not strongly. I also found a couple of brief but non-trivial mentions in ''The Bangkok Post'' and one in ''Computer Active'', and one in ''New Straits Times''. Also a brief mention in ''South China Morning Post
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and a |trout for both. Carrite, as stated by LibStar Google hits are not indicative of notability, which is what was being indicated when Peter banana came up; practically anything can have a large number of Google hits. LibStar, it's best if you don't let Carrite get under your skin; sarcasm is not always read well online. As for the AfD: no |reliable sources, be they newspapers, books, or whatnot, to prove |notability, so it fails the |General Notability Guidelines. Everything I've seen so far has been a blog or advertising site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:GNG)