Deletion of Tchindas

Comment: why is this still open? Keep it per , actual sourcin makes this film notable beyond any reasonable doubt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per meeting . While authorship is a concern, the film topic is notable none-the-less and merits an article. And while poorly sourced when nominated, that lack is an |addresable minor issue in the face of . Easy  finds lots of sourcing: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/tchindas-outfest-review-807822 ''HollywoodReporter'', http://www.timeout.com/chicago/blog/five-films-we-cant-wait-to-see-at-chicagos-reeling-film-festival-091515 ''Time Out Chicago'' (1), https://www.frontiersmedia.com/frontiers-blog/2015/07/15/outfest-2015-tchindas-a-fascinating-trans-doc-from-cape-verde-gets-world-premiere/ ''Frontiers Media'', http://www.timeout.com/chicago/blog/reeling-snags-stonewall-freeheld-for-33rd-lgbt-film-fest-080515 ''Time Out Chicago'' (2), http://76crimes.com/2015/07/10/qa-about-tchindas-a-new-frontier-of-trans-films/ ''76 Crimes'', http://www.outfest.org/tixSYS/2015/xslguide/eventnote.php?notepg=1&EventNumber=0628 ''Outfest Los Angeles'', https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tchindas%22&tbm=nws and others. Like it or not, the topic meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:ATD||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE)