Deletion of 7700 16th Street NW

Comment: While the focus of much of the articles is not on the house, there is enough coverage to show that it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is inevitably going to be a claim that this building is covered "extensively" in sources; that would be an incorrect assertion. Yes, the building is passively ''mentioned'' in the context of notable incidents, but it is never written ''about'' as a notable building.  explicitly states: "'''Geographical features must be notable on their own merits. They cannot inherit the notability of organizations, people, or events'''". Considering the majority of the article is now devoted to incidents that transpired within it and sources '''about the events''' are |crammed into the text to fabricate the illusion of multiple sources, it is too obvious this building fails NGEO and GNG. I strongly urge editors to evaluate the sources before being fooled by what appears to be a bounty of coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO||WP:BOMBARD)

Comment: Are we going to put up 10050 Cielo Drive (Manson "family" house, that I presume isn't a cause for POV issues) to AfD on the same rationale? This isn't a  fail - as the geo guideline for buildings notable for social (e.g. crime) reasons is {{tq|Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.}} - basically  - the crime site could be notable per GEO, the question is sources available on the place
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT||WP:GNG)