Deletion of Gary DeMar

Comment: as passes  criteria 1 (only one criteria needed) as prominent in his field, in this case Preterism imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I don't see any coverage of him, so the only item to consider is . No indication of any awards or such. The best I have for him is Google Scholar, one of his books gets 68 citations, but I don't think that's enough to pass NAUATHOR, and he is not an academic anyway to contend for NPROF
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: does not meet : no significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources - I didn't check all his books, but some are published by American Vision with which he has a close connection, so they may count as self-published - in any event, I couldn't find any reviews or writeups to satisfy  - notability not established
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: His work was the subject of a highly critical ''Newsweek'' article: ''Beliefwatch: Separated?'' by Waldman, Steven, Sep 11, 2006, Vol.148(9), p.9. His work was also attacked in ''Friend or Foe?'' by David, Jim, ''The Advocate'' (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine), April 11, 2006, p.32(1) His work was also brought to task in "Justice David Josiah Brewer and the "Christian nation" maxim", Green, Steven K., ''Albany Law Review'', Winter, 1999, Vol.63(2), p.427. His work was also discussed in "Purifying the Law: The Legal World of "Christian Patriots"", Barkun, Michael, ''Journal for the Study of Radicalism'', 2007, Vol.1(1), pp.57-70. With national media and academic articles outside of his field publishing criticsm of his work, I'd say he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)