Deletion of Valley Girl Syndrome (VGS)

Comment: The title is not a plausible search term as noted above so it would not make for a useful redirect. I'm inclined to agree with the / arguments, but even discounting those I don't think there's any arguing that this meets #14 ({{tq|Any other content wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|not suitable for an encyclopedia}}), specifically ikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. That's basically what the editors above are already saying, even if they're phrasing it differently
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A11||WP:G3||WP:DELREASON||WP:W)

Comment: I think  applies. As Metropolitan90 noted, even if we took it for granted that there is such a thing as "Valley Girl Syndrome", it clearly doesn't refer to what the article purports it to be, so it's a blatant hoax. Either way there's hardly a point in keeping this unreferenced soapbox rant that has a snowball's chance in hell of becoming serviceable encyclopedic content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G3)

Comment: Unsourced polemical screed--and even more the point with regard to policy, original thought of the user.  Certainly a  call, and I think I find even the G3 speedy delete rationals argued above more compelling than not.  Salting may even be a cost-benefit positive here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)