Deletion of Jill Billcock

Comment: Subject's notability is asserted and sourced. With respects to the nominator, |"no one's been working on it" is not a valid reason to delete something when notability is so easy to discern
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: per coverage in  discussed above and awards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It helps to read the Google News hits as well as count them. The subject won an American Cinema Editors|Eddie in 2002http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/290084911.html?dids=290084911:290084911&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Feb+17%2C+2003&author=John+Horn&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=The+Week+Ahead%3B+Keep+your+eye+on+the+little+races&pqatl=google and the International Award for Filmmaking Excellence at the 2007 Australian Film Institute awards,http://www.abc.net.au/rn/movietime/stories/2007/2111942.htm and was nominated for an Academy Award|Oscar in 2001,http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,23083134-5005368,00.html clearly passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per other "keep" recommendations above. An Oscar-nominated film editor with multiple other awards and nominations in the field of editing satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)