Deletion of Alexandre Marcel Simonet

Comment: We have two books with false ISBN, a diagnostic coding manual which certainly isn't going to say anything about anyone, two journal articles which don't mention the author in abstract and cost a total of $266.00 to see in whole, the book supposedly published by the Library of Congress (??) which a prior commenter searched and couldn't find any mention of the author, and a bunch of vauge references to some sort of French documents.  Definately not meeting  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: This person appears to be |non-notable in |reliable sources to indicate |significant coverage, and we simply cannot take the chance on possible |hoaxes, because we do not want another hoax at Wikipedia for people to read for five years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:HOAX)

Comment: Until someone can provide some proof that it's not a hoax, it should be deleted. If someone can provide some proof, then I guess I'd have to look at that proof in order to see if they meet the  or not. At this rate though, I don't see how it could
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as a hoax, failing . Just about every link I spot-checked in the references didn't pan out. As I'm not currently at school, I can't check behind the paywall, but given that Google Books hasn't even ''heard'' of this guy as an author, odds of hoax are very high
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Two of the two actual ISBNs there are fake. |Kill it with fire
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: Caramanico, the motives of the person who raised a concern about this article do not matter, it will not be deleted just because someone complained. But that does make us look closely at it, to see how it stands up to Wikipedia's erifiability policy: "''any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source''" and otability guideline, which requires evidence of: "''significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)