Deletion of Mike Cernovich (2nd nomination)

Comment: Appears to satisfy  based on the New Yorker piece alone. That article appears to be highly reliable to me. The New Yorker has an strong reputation for accuracy and regularly publishes opinion-y articles that are still thoroughly fact checked. This appears to be an excellent example of that. (I'm not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Here's a  that mentions him http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/17/politics/kfile-michael-flynn-social-media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There '''literally''' only 2 articles from legitimate sources and one video interview cited in the article. The rest are not acceptable sources for Wikipedia (such as his own site) or reference him once and that's it. This guy doesn't even pass any of the criteria for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Having an in-depth biographical profile in a major news outlet, combined with other sources easily establish 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)