Deletion of Feathercoin

Comment: There are a number of news articles http://www.coindesk.com/feathercoin-secures-block-chain-advanced-check-pointing/, http://bitcoinmagazine.com/6263/feathercoin-interview-with-peter-bushnell/, http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jun/25/bitcoin-successors-litecoin-freicoin, and http://thebitcoinnews.co.uk/2013/05/31/bitcoin-competitor-feathercoin-prepares-to-challenge-alternate-currencies/ that look secondary and reasonably independent to me. The articles are from coindesk.com, bitcoinmagazine.com and theguardian.com; theses sources look reliable to me, but I'm no expert on the specialist press for this field. Overall, it seems like there are multiple RS needed for marginal notability. The article is bit promotional, but toning it down is a surmountable problem, per . A marginally notable topic and and an article with surmountable problems suggests a (marginal) keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: I have no idea whether Litecoin should be deleted or not, but it |isn't the subject of discussion here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)