Deletion of Myriam Heiman

Comment: I'm not seeing how she meets rof#C1, since it doesn't seem there are ''any'' independent citations (although I just brought up a potential independent RS in the Talk section). The "Latham Family Career Development Associate Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences" also does not count toward rof#C5 as it's for junior faculty. I'm partial to this being 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: WP:OUTCOMES|we almost always delete articles where |the subject is a BLP of |arguable notabilkity, and the subject wants it deleted for good reasons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BARE)

Comment: The argument for wiki-notability would be by way of #C1, and it doesn't seem to be an outstandingly good case (i.e., standing out in an exceptional way relative to the field). Overall, there just doesn't appear to be a reason to think that this biography is so necessary to understanding the area where Dr. Heiman works that a public benefit exists which outweighs the deletion request
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: There is a problem here because the subject appears to meet rof#C1 on the basis of GS citations. No verifiable evidence is presented that the subject wants deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Normally I'd probably have gone for weak keep with the analysis above about citation counts, but going for weak delete due to the request for deletion by the subject, which I'm taking as legitimate as per . On a side note, there is potential for  as well, based on comments by PgeMIT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:GOODFAITH||WP:COI)

Comment: I think the citation counts are enough for #C1, but there's really not much else, and that makes the case borderline enough that the subject's wishes should prevail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)