Deletion of Albert M. Wolters (second nomination)

Comment: to respect the result of the previous AfD. Indeed the current page is speediable as a recreation of validly deleted content, and was only undeleted to allow discussion on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:VFU)

Comment: this content was already deleted, without challenge.  If a new article, which shows something new (like listing writing about him, not just by him) than a different AFD result might be reasonable.  Frankly, I don't like the citing of  here.   is about freeing individual wikipedians from mindless application of rules, not letting admins use their extra powers to do things, nobody else can do
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:IAR)

Comment: Can't decide whether he's notable or not. Depends on whether a TV appearance makes you more than an 'average professor'. However I'd just like to opine that the fact that this discussion is so much more lively than the previous one justifies the use of , though perhaps, at worst, it might have been "right decision, wrong reason
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)