Deletion of Thirteen Thirty-Six

Comment: This entire article (excepting the death of Justin Hearn) and the notability of the band can be verified through archived articles in the Port Huron Times Herald. The Times Herald is an acceptable publication according to the articles concerning verification. Passes  and . The website at which these articles can be accessed is www.thetimesherald.com
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:V)

Comment: Please explain which of the  criteria this passes.  Also, please add citations to the article so the community can decide if  is met
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:V)

Comment: Unfortunately, most editors, such as myself, don't consider that to be a "non-trivial" mention in the strictest sense of the word; for example, there is a review of CDs published by local artists in the arts section of my local newspaper as well, but I would hardly consider any of them to be worthy of Wikipedia, as most of them are self-published EPs and whatnot. (There is a discussion about this on the talk page of , I believe.) Assuming that there have been any mentions outside of the "home market" or if any of the  criteria were otherwise satisfied, then I would be willing to reconsider. As it is, my vote still stands
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: If it is a , then it's a hoax on MySpace too (which is the first google result you get. Fails  David<span
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I am unsure as to why your ''opinion'' on what is non-trivial should outweigh my own or why you are so vehement in your argument against Thirteen Thirty-Six. I am shocked that you provide no more than a semblance of statistics (though "most editors... don't consider that to be a 'non-trivial' mention." hardly even resembles a fact) to support your assertion that the Port Huron Times Herald is a "trivial" periodical, even in the strictest sense of the word. There are currently no statutes concerning the definition of "non-trivial" for use as a reference for  verification and therefore it is a matter of opinion as to whether or not a periodical is indeed trivial. Your opinion, or that of any other individual, weighs no more heavily than my own on this matter. Please clarify exactly how my support and citations aren't "good enough" for Wikipedia with anything other than personal opinions and challenges (or, if you prefer, a clarification as to how your opinions outweigh my own), and I will gladly concede the point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I apologize for not being more clear about this when I originally struck out your second "vote"... but while AfD is not a "vote" in the strictest sense, please make your recommendation (e.g., ''Save'') only once, per #How to discuss an AfD/Wikietiquette.  If you have additional information you wish to provide, please use ''Comment'' or something to that effect.  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: fails  and  (knowing every member personally and relaying anecdotes is not valid verification
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:V)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:MUSIC)