Deletion of Kompany

Comment: certainly "TOOSOON", doesn't demonstrate notability, PR releases, I think the 2 new SPAs who voted here should answer the obvious question about  (see N
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:COIN)

Comment: I made some improvements so the article could be judged on the merits of its info and sources, rather than poor formatting. Sourcing is poor, and doesn't demonstrate notability. Several sources are replicated from press releases. It may be . If sourcing can be tightened and improved with more coverage, I'd switch to a keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Every single one of the references are either PR, name-drops in lists of no significance or based on announcements/interviews/quotation where all the information is provided by the company and there is no Independent Content. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and we require multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article as follows
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)