Deletion of Peter Curzon, 4th Viscount Scarsdale

Comment: I think I'm coming down on the side of keeping articles on peers or their heirs, whether or not they sit in the House of Lords, as all their predecessors did (and therefore all meet ) and it would be slightly odd and not of value to the project to break the chain of Wikipedia articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: likely to be notable per . The sources we have for the page so far are generally good but do not cover all the information given on the page. Please note also the comment of Jimbo Wales at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gordon, 7th Marquess of Aberdeen and Temair and elsewhere: "There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub. Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part of a wider series, is mistaken
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)