Deletion of List of fictional Alumni of Real Universities

Comment: per  -- "While the "cruft" label is often used for any or all things of perceived minor interest, it is worth considering carefully whether or not so-called "cruft" has potential." I think the list has good potential for organization, and allows citing sources better than a category does (as I just did for Lord Peter Wimsey
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: per  never being a valid reason to delete as well as per Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: : "If the sources cited do not explicitly reach the same conclusion, or if the sources cited are not directly related to the subject of the article, then the editor is engaged in original research."  This is a classic example of synthesizing information into original research.  You take Tony Stark who went to MIT (A), then you take Chuck who went to Stanford (B), and you realize that there are any number of fictional characters whose back story includes attending a real university (C). Once again, : "Editors should not make the mistake of thinking that if A is published by a reliable source, and B is published by a reliable source, then A and B can be joined together in an article to come to the conclusion C."  Where is the third party source that discusses this topic?  Find one reliable third party source that discusses the topic of Fictional Alumni of Real Universities ''as an independent topic'' and you will prove this is not OR
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)