Deletion of Michelle McMullen

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: the subject of this AfD has received |significant coverage in http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Michelle+McMullen%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 multiple non-primary |reliable sources, and thus passes  and . That being said the subject received this significant coverage based on the event which is a crime, therefore it can be argued that the subject falls under , and it would be the event not the individual which is notable. Furthermore, the subject of the AfD, is a biography article and thus maybe judged for notability by , which the subject does not appear to pass. Therefore, as the subject has passed GNG, but fails PERP there are two potential outcomes that abide with the guidelines. 1)Redirect and rename so that the article is about the event, or 2)Delete the article. I am of the present opinion that deletion is the best option at this time. If the event receives |continuing |in-depth coverage I can understand recreation of this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BLP1E||WP:PERP||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: per  - ''A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial '''should not''' normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)