Deletion of Natural History of South Asia mailing list (3rd nomination)

Comment: Now that it's clear we don't have reliable sources that really justify the importance of this mailing list, I think it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: See .  Think ''sources'', not ''numbers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:BIGNUMBER)

Comment: the "major institution of world-wide stature" you refer to would be the American Museum of Natural History, which happens to be the one reference that was most dubious of all, what with it not actually being at the AMNH itself.  Appearing in a link list is no big deal, ''regardless of who compiles the list'' - it is still a trivial mention for the purposes of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: No assertion of notability. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)