Deletion of Altin Gysman

Comment: subject has not received "''significant'' coverage" in reliable sources (not a single book reference that I could find and nothing on Scholar). As such he is not notable per the . Also happy with a redirect per RightCowLeftCoast, I guess it might be a valid search time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to 6 South African Infantry Battalion#List of Commanders. In searching for content about the subject, there are multiple mentions of the subject in |non-primary or secondary reliable sources, that being said most of the sources mention the subject as part of the unit which the subject commands. I have found no reliable sources that are tertiary to the subject, where the subject has received significant coverage and is the primary topic of the content, therefore, the subject does not appear to meet . As for , the statement "an individual is presumed to be notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources." comes directly from GNG, I should know I helped write SOLDIER. It means, that even if the subject does not meet the criteria set forth in SOLDIER, if the subject meets GNG, the article subject is notable. In this case the subject does not appear to meet any of the criteria set forth in SOLDIER and does not meet GNG. Therefore, at this time the best that can be done other than deletion is to change this article into a redirect towards an embedded list of commanders of the unit which the subject is a commander of, as most of the reliable sources that I have found about this article, are about the unit not the unit's commander, as its primary topic
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS||WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER)