Deletion of UNIT dating controversy

Comment: Sounds like  to me.  "Arguments that the nature of the subject is unencyclopaedic (for example individual songs or episodes of a TV show) should also be avoided in the absence of clear policies or guidelines against articles on such subjects
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Well, I wish all AfD critiques got that level of quality response, excellent footnotes.  Far as I'm concerned those completely eliminate any question of ,  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: I am content to rest on  here. While this article may technically meet our guidelines, common sense tells me this has no place here, but would be better suited to a fan forum. Being an encyclopedia doesn't mean we have to cover everything in the universe that might be of interest to someone, somewhere
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNORE)

Comment: Regarding the sources, above all else this article needs a footnote right at the end of the first sentence to verify that the controversy exists and is notable enough to warrant an article.  I respect the references as published works on the overall subject of Doctor Who, and in and of themselves those references satisfy  but a direct page citation regarding ''this specific subtopic'' is desperately needed for .  Show me this is an ongoing controvery, don't tell me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)