Deletion of Raúl Carrillo

Comment: ndash; significant coverage exists in multiple independent sources (https://www.starherald.com/news/local_news/carrillo-from-barrio-gang-to-a-shot-at-the-title/article_b510c764-4a2c-11e1-bf8b-001871e3ce6c.html, https://www.timescall.com/2012/01/30/fighting-for-respect-boxing-has-helped-longmonts-raul-carrillo-turn-his-life-around/, https://www.boxingscene.com/raul-carrillo-tyler-pogline-settle-score--88284, https://www.boxingscene.com/frankel-carrillo-ready-brawl-sheridan-colorado--49660), thus the subject passes the |GNG. |Notability is permanent, not temporary, so it does not matter that the subject no longer receives such coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: There's no evidence he meets .  My search didn't find the significant independent coverage I believe is required to meet .  Everything I found was routine pre-fight coverage or reporting of results.  All of the the sources mentioned by CJK09 were written right before his loss for the USNBC title (which one of the sources mistakenly called a world title).  That seems like both routine sports reporting and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOX||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)