Deletion of New Quantum Theory

Comment: It's junk like this that makes me realize why we require reliable ''secondary'' sources for research results. It's too easy to get nonsense published in unscrupulous journals. Anyway, I think  covers this: it goes against the scientific consensus and has no mainstream sources explaining that fact, therefore we are unable to cover it in a sufficiently |neutral fashion, so we should not cover it at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as non-notable . -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.31|202.124.73.31
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Agreed, this is a fringe theory () in that goes against scientific mainstream with respect to quantum mechanics and electrodynamics and apparently has few adherents. Even as a fringe theory, there is only a single primary source and no independent sources on which to base an article The article also makes exceptional claims about mainstream theories, e.g.,  quantum mechanics cannot explain phenomena such as interference, but provides no exceptional evidence for such assertions, failing . The article fails notability and verifiability guidelines and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:EXCEPTIONAL)