Deletion of Elizabeth Shin

Comment: The fire was definitely notable, with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Please bear in mind that  states that if we had an article about this incident, then this page should be deleted and redirected to that article. But since we don't have such a page, this article is appropriate. So from a policy standpoint, the only two options I can see are (1) rework this to be a page about the incident or (2) keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I oppose the new proposal to keep and rename. If we are now evaluating this as an event rather than a biography, then  applies. No one has identified a lasting effect of her death
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: and '''rename''' to '''Death of Elizabeth Shin'''. This event and its aftermath have attracted significant, persistent coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, satisfying . That's what this article is actually about, anyway, despite its title. The only biographical details it contains are reasonable background material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and '''Rename''', meets  and  with  plenty of sources covering/discussing this, Shin's  death has led to significant and |lasting changes in US educational institutions (as brought out by a number of editors above), agree that Death of Elizabeth Shin is an appropriate title for this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT||WP:LASTING)

Comment: Tragic but 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: and '''Rename''' as suggested, since the consequences have had |lasting changes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: per  and  . Just having14 sources and concerning a well known educational institution does not make it an encyclopedic article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BIO1E)