Deletion of Los Negrales

Comment: This is a  situation. The text is almost unreadable—even such a small point as "What do they mean in this cultural context by 'chalets'", and the larger point of the legal status of the community are unclear, and although I read fluent ESL-ese, I would need to go phrase by phrase with the Spanish to understand the article. That is not useful for our readers. As always in a TNT situation, if someone wants to do the necessary complete rewrite—in this case, retranslate the article properly—the reason for deletion goes away. The topic may or may not be notable: as stated above, the train station indicates it may be. But the article is ptentially a minefield of inaccuracies and is not useful as it is. That's why we have a policy against raw machine translations, and I agree, this one is still raw. I have my hands more than full fixing some of the 3,000 articles the WMF cruelly suckered editors into creating. I can't work on this one. I'll happily change my tune if someone ''does'' do it right in time and if it ''does'' then demonstrate minimal notability as a place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Satisfies , and |AFD is not cleanup. In any case, the article has been cleaned up and is fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: why would you think that X2 applied, geographic articles of real places are rarely snowballs. The irony here is that, it seems to be a recognized place (and has a train station, which many consider a notable thing itself, leaving something notable train station within a non-notable place).  says improve rather than delete. Since a machine translation can certainly be improved, are we now abandoning . I (any many others as well) could probably do a reasonable job translating the article, but why waste my time if it's a deletion magnet no matter what
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE)