Deletion of Amber Rain (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails , if you discount  BIO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PORN)

Comment: Please, please, wikipediatrix, find something else to say. I would love to find something interesting, unique, notable that couldn't be written about the next 100 porn stars. (By the way, as Fan-1967 writes, "porn star" is just the accepted term, and does not connote fame; it's a job description. Some are notable, most aren't. Using "actress" has similar issues implying acting. See Taija Rae's famous quote.) I tried hard to find a reason to keep this article, or even to write something interesting and encyclopedic, and just couldn't. Those 4 lines are as good as I could get. I really think there is no more - but if you |prove me wrong, I'll be only too glad to keep the article. As Uncle G writes, read the pages that come up. I did that. They're image galleries with no useful text, hundreds of them. There were 2 articles and 3 database entries, with readable content of ... 4 lines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)