Deletion of Sitecore

Comment: it's |spam masquerading as an article. Its third-party coverage is not significant. I agree with the points Ihcoyc make
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ARTSPAM)

Comment: I nominated this for proposed deletion, after it showed up as a "|but my competitor has an article!" in the Ektron AfD.Gartner comes up with dismaying frequency.  They are investment related industry analysts; editorial writeups by them are essentially driven by the people who pay them.  Coverage in Gartner does not equate with notability.  Their "magic quadrants" pop up frequently as well, but as far as I can tell all that means is that Gartner has put you on a list, they're no more evidence of notability than inclusions in "top 100" lists are.  Inclusion of these things does not really count as editorial recognition.  And CMSwire is a website that focuses entirely on the "content management" sector, and as such is of such |limited circulation and interest that it can't really make anything notable.Moreover, the article itself is #G11|unambiguous advertising, and written in marketing-speak: ''...a full-featured, content-driven Content Management Framework with separation of content and presentation. Featuring the concept of unified structural elements called Content Items, the system can be used for various content delivery scenarios
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:CORP||WP:CSD)