Deletion of Leatherface (film)

Comment: per meeting . The production has been receiving more-than-trivial coverage since 2013,https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Texas+Chainsaw+Massacre+4%22&tbm=nwshttp://www.imdb.com/title/tt2620590/news?year=2014http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2620590/news to meet  and with filming confirmed, F|F (paragraph 3) is met.  The project is served by having this remain and be improved over time through regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NFF)

Comment: per  due to numerous periodicals covering the development and the casting for the film. There is not trivial mention here;  has a footnote showing an example of a trivial mention. Articles that headline ''Leatherface'' is not trivial, even if the same general details are being reported. Also, it has verifiably crossed the threshold of having started filming, which means that a concrete product is underway. I've never seen "the production itself is notable" to mean that we need significant coverage about the filming itself even though we already have significant coverage about the preparation for it. To me, it is intended to guard against having articles about films in production that nobody has been covering at all. I think it may be worth re-wording that sentence, because for non-blockbuster films, there can be significant coverage leading up to the start of the filming (reporting on all the pieces being pulled together), followed by a lull in coverage (maybe there is some local coverage where a film is shot), then more significant coverage as the film comes out. It is detrimental to just delete this article due to lack of filming detail only to restore it later
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)