Deletion of Kailer Yamamoto

Comment: I think a case could be made for #2 on NHOCKEY given his time in the WHL and his age (professional leagues are not an option for all but the most elite 18-year-olds). However, that's probably a stretch. However, the external references I think are probably enough to pass GNG and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:YOUNGATH)

Comment: Frankly, I'm not remotely moved by Certain! First! Rounder! arguments, because in the half-century I've been following hockey, I've seen any number of Certain! First! Rounders! drop by the wayside.  I'm also not moved by the number of blogsites and primary sources being passed off as meeting the requirements of the GNG, which they most certainly do not.  Nor does playing for the U18 team meet any notability requirements, least of all , nor am I particularly moved by what the ranking toutsheets were saying a few months ago, because in the end result, exactly how many 5'8" forwards get drafted first round in today's NHL? (And, finally, taking an article to AfD after a speedy tag's been removed is ''exactly'' proper procedure, and scarcely an outrage.)  But that being said, the ''Spokesman-Review'' and ''THN'' sources are good ones, and so this is a ''bare'' GNG pass
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)