Deletion of Donnie Davies (3rd nomination)

Comment: established as viral marketing, so the article is . Joel Oglesby can list Wikipedia alongside YouTube and Google; that's the consolation prize for spamming, I guess. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: conditional on updating the current article to reflect the new sources listed by SquatGoblin. Disclosure: I posted the current version. It was speedy deleted, and on review I was inclined to agree the sourcing was marginal and largeley circular. Given the coverage by several non-trivial sources in the interim, the article now appears to pass  and  if properly amended. The article should not (and does not) state conclusively whether this is a hoax (an unverifiable claim), but shoud discuss the (verifiable) controversy and provide the appropriate references. Without those additional, external sources, the article is susceptible to the criticisms in other votes above regarding sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)