Deletion of Saaya Irie (2nd nomination)

Comment: Given the absence of any in-depth reliable coverage other than just name mentions, it's hard to see how this person even satisfies the |basic notability criteria. No evidence of any significant film roles, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The nominator, which is an , does not present an actual argument for deletion. The article is far from an advertisement or spam, nor is the subject "not suitable for an encyclopedia". The individual clearly passes  for having significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions (including sound tracks). It does, however, need serious sourcing. The :ja:紗綾|Japanese version of the article has 19 sources listed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:ENT)

Comment: unless better sourcing can be provided.  I tend to agree that the nomination is a little lackluster, but that doesn't change the fact that there are no viable eliable sources establishing notability or confirming the various claims found in the article.  Of the five references utilized in the page, only the Guardian article meets our S standards and it does not establish anything about this young woman's career, outside the fact that she is a model. In fact, the article refers to her by name only twice: ''"The two women – Saaya, 20, and Eri Aoki, 25 – were sent to Yoyogi park in August for the Saturday variety show on which they appear, the Nikkan Sports said."'' and ''"Saaya, who has appeared regularly in Japanese Playboy, blogged about her high fever last Wednesday before news of the dengue outbreak spread."''.  The piece is all of ten sentences long in total.  On the whole, I am afraid I have to agree, there is not nearly enough here to meet the standards of  or any of the other notability criteria which might be applied to Ms. Irie at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:RS||WP:GNG)