Deletion of Jacksepticeye

Comment: as subject meets  and has a large following in his genre.  The article could use some significant improvement, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This  article is continually in a poor state due to it being mistreated as a fanpage, with frequent vandalism and additions of unsourced or poorly sourced material, as is evidenced in the page history. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Jacksepticeye&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_tag_log=1&hide_review_log=1&hide_thanks_log=1 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacksepticeye&action=history  With that said, the subject does appear to be notable according to the recent outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JackSepticEye.  Poorly sourced claims attributed to YouTube and the like should be diminished in favor of coverage from the Irish Times, the Irish Examiner, and similarly reliable third party publications.  regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)