Deletion of Rentech

Comment: Nominator admits not doing . I added a few of the readily available RS refs. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:V does ''not'' preclude the use of primary sources, so the rationale for the nomination is invalid. {{tl|primary sources}} should be used in cases where the complaining editor doesn't feel like fixing such problems himself. Subsequent investigation revealed that the company meets . In addition to the above, here's for example an FAA book/report discussing some of Rentech's programs http://books.google.com/books?id=QyM58KcmiaoC&pg=PA112. I don't edit in the area of biofuels, but some specialist publications clearly have extensive coverage of Rentech http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/tag/rentech/, and they are probably RS. Also, their fertilizer business gets some attention as well http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/13/business/la-fi-stock-spotlight-rentech-20131014http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/03/rentechnitrogen-idUSL4E7M354T20111103http://seekingalpha.com/article/1726312-rentech-nitrogen-partners-east-dubuque-update.  Finally, being listed at NYSE made it ''very unlikely'' that the company isn't apriori notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTED)

Comment: It is sourced now with third-party sources to meet  and . It also meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)