Deletion of Smart File System

Comment: AfD talks a bunch about notability, but the underlying policy behind all this is |verifiability; if there are enough third-party sources to be able to verify an article, that should be considered notability enough (and this is pretty much exactly what  says!), and if there aren't, you'll never be able to write a verifiable article and thus it should be deleted. Seeing the conversation above made me fear that the article couldn't be verified (a one-sentence mention isn't really enough), but although some of the existing citations are dubious, there seems to be enough valid ones around that it's possible to write a verifiable article (perhaps a shorter one than currently, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: This was a very difficult decision, but I think, after examining the new sources added to the article, that it does satisfy  and . (There are a couple of linked manuals exclusively about the file system.) Therefore, I am changing my opinion to "keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFTWARE)

Comment: Agree with Biblioworm, the manuals show SFS passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFTWARE)