Deletion of Open Watcom Assembler

Comment: I am one of the editors notified by Cunard.  This is perfectly in line with process for  in which interested editors are notified.  It seems quite reasonable to assume that editors who took an interest in the deletion discussion for JWASM which resulted in a redirect to Open Watcom Assembler would also be interested if this article were nominated for deletion.  The notfication was completely neutral in tone and neither advocates for keeping the article, nor deleting the article. This isn't canvassing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: Sorry, I've asked for valid third party sources and no one wants to cough them up.  I can't find them either.  I am sure that this article will be kept (this time) under some sort of  since everyone seems to like it (?) I don't really understand why we're totally ignoring our notability guidelines and making an exception for this one assembler
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: and merge (some of) the material from the redirected JWASM back into this article.  I almost feel like this is '''Speedy keep''', since it follows immediately on the redirect decision from the other AfD, and hence verges on y
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)