Deletion of Green Level High School

Comment: Easily enough sourcing to pass , as with any other secondary school in the western world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:BITE. The article is two days old. It comes with three references, which give significant coverage, two of which are clearly independent. That's   even before other editors have opportunity to assist. It is non-profit so WP:ORG does not apply. You are right to quote "almost always found to be notable". It is a new build, it has one year group- it is not our job her to predict what our reader will find of interest. If you wish to improve the article- details of the architecture, details of why there was a need for extra capacity, details of the intake, including racial profile, some details of the context of education systems within the state. There is yet no details of the finances capital and yearly budget. Eventually the list of proposed programmes will need to be edited or selectively culled. We do not retain editors by jumping in so fast and erroneously. Finally there is an empty Talk:Green Level High School|Talk Page where you can share your experience
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)