Deletion of Rocket Records

Comment: I just contributed a ''moderate edit'' to this article, deleting mostly the poorly sourced and non-relevant information found in the article as correctly noted by various editors/administrators. This shortened the article by a good deal as well. I also classified the article as a ''Record Label Stub'', so that it can be productively expanded upon by the community at-large. I suggest keeping the newly edited article as a ''Record Label Stub'' under WikiProject Record Labels and WikiProject Music as opposed to a full deletion, which would not serve a fully productive purpose for community readers in my honest estimation. New  guidelines (including  and  specific to record labels) will hopefully be quickly established via official proposal of such to the entire community at-large. The community at-large recently made changes to  article inclusion guidelines for all articles about music producers, composers, and songwriters, and article inclusion guidelines for record labels will most likely be classified somewhat similarly, though exactly how so is still yet to be determined by the Wikipedia community at-large
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: the argument about existence or not is a bit of a side-track because whether it exists or not, or is registered or not, is irrelevant to AFD anyway. What matters here is whether or not the company is |notable or not, with reference to . I will happily accept that the company exists, but it doesn't necessarily  notability from the people it represents (which would need to be |verified anyway) and I can't see a depth of significant coverage in |reliable sources that would suggest it is notable. I suggest we move away from arguments as to whether it is registered or not and consider whether the subject is notable, as is the point of AFD. More than happy to consider conjecture in that regard or to look at any reliable sources that confer notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:INHERIT||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Many of the sources provided in this article do not meet ; those that are reliable sources do not discuss this company the depth necessary to show  or  is met. Indeed, some of the sources don't even mention the company ''at all'', so why they are included as references is incomprehensible. If all the uncited and irrelevant content were to be removed, there would be nothing left here that isn't just an attempt at notability by association. This article appears to be part of a Wikipedia:WALLED|walled garden in that the creator has edited little to nothing outside of the scope of this and related Wikipedia:Coatrack|coatrack articles that are similarly poorly-sourced puff pieces. ('''Addendum''': after deletion, recreate as a redirect to :The Rocket Record Company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)