Deletion of John J. O'Connor (mathematician)

Comment: O'Connor may not pass . However, is notable as one of the creators of MacTutor History of Mathematics archive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Both, since they each individually meet the following  criterion: “The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work …” As far as  is concerned, arguably only Robertson passes it, but both meet , which is why I am recommending that both be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: to MacTutor History of Mathematics archive unless there's reason to think that he's notable for something other than founding this website.  may be of assistance
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Robertson, and '''redirect''' O'Connor to MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. For Robertson it is fairly clear that he passes : certainly criterion 1 and probably criterion 3 as well.  An elected fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, plus his involvement in MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, plus his long-term editorship of the Groups-StAndrews series, plus his textbooks make a convincing case. With O'Connor, apart from his role in MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, I didn't really find much else. That's not enough for passing  and I don't think it is sufficient for passing the  provision of  either (especially since no biographical-type coverage of him by third-party sources appears to be available). O'Connor really looks more like a  case and there does not seem to be a reasonable possibility of significantly expanding an article about him beyond the current short stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E)