Deletion of Thermostat Fallacy

Comment: Article fails to meet notability criteria (see ), which requires significant coverage of a topic in multiple independent reliable sources. As with the nominator, I couldn't find any reliable sources that mention Thermostat Fallacy, or Thermostat Error in the sense it's used in this article. Their use in a personal and a company blog (e.g., http://archives.grantstavely.com/the-thermostat-fallacy/ grantstavely.com and http://www.heatingcoolingservice.com/thermostat-101-a-common-error/ heatingcoolingservice.com) doesn't matter because these are not reliable sources (see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: pure, unadulterated |synthesis, plain and simple, based on a blog post. None of the "sources" even mention (from what I can see) "Thermostat Fallacy" and others simply dot-point common misunderstandings about how control systems work. That's not topic that requires encyclopaedic coverage and it obviously isn't notable. http://archives.grantstavely.com/the-thermostat-fallacy/ This blog post (from the talk page) says it all - a term some kid made up to explain something his dad told him about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)