Deletion of Jocelyne Couture-Nowak (third nomination)

Comment: Meets  and let's move on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Her family and friends have my sympathies but being a crime victim (particularly for a crime for which we already have an article in which she is mentioned) is simply not notable enough for a biographical encyclopedia.  Subject does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets  and  for her work in establishing the French public school in Nova Scotia, with significant impact to French-speakers in that area.  Also -- per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: Is the subject of multiple non-trivial published works by reliable sources, the core criterion of  and .  The topic became notable due to the tragedy.  Just because some users |don't like the reason she became notable doesn't suddenly make her non-notable.  "The world" decides if someone is notable, not Wikipedia editors.  And I'm troubled that this nom has made only 1 edit before starting this AfD since September 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Brokethebank.  In addition to all of this, we just had a DLR on this topic on May 9, 2007.  Way too soon for yet another AfD and lengthy debate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BIO||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)