Deletion of Anti-Israel lobby in the United States

Comment: as a flagrant attack page and violation (even in the title) of ; it's one of the worst  violations I've seen in a long time. Some of the content may be salvageable for other article(s), but I'm not immediately sure where. One thing is clear: we cannot allow groups who self-define "pro-Israel" to label a bunch of other organisations as "anti-Israel" as if that was their stated objective. And that's effectively what this article is doing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Merge any NPOV part into relevant existing articles and delete rest as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: As should any article be if the only reason is PoV. An article title can be changed to remove PoV, the content can be changed to replace or remove PoV. If nothing consequential remains of the article, it can be deleted under , which along with  are the only major -''content''- rules that the drafters of  saw fit to include as reasons for deleting -''articles''-. Stop the madness
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:DELETION)

Comment: http://www.google.com/search?q=%22anti+israel+lobby%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Evidently notable. I might support a move to the more general Anti-Israel lobby, but that's a different disscussion for a differnet day. What's clear at this point is that there's no legitimate basis for removing the artilce since  has yet to be accepted as a valid deletion argument. Any specific POV concerns should be rectified by this cool thing called editing, not wholesale deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: There is some useful content here, which could be merged to Israel lobby in the United States. But mostly this is an attack page, violates , a quite extraordinary collection of garbage (American Friends Service Committee - and Quakers in geneneral - have a long history of opposing antisemitism) with an unacceptable POV title. I agree with Zero that it is a  for so-called "pro-Israel" claims
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per nom, NSH001 and Rd232. If someone wants to have the page userfied to retrieve some of the information for inclusion in existing articles such as Arab lobby in the United States, Israel lobby in the United States and articles on individual organizations, they are welcome to. Those articles are named correctly. This one is named so as to reflect the POV of the Israel lobby. Most of the groups named reject the label "anti-Israel" and grouping them under such a label violated  as they do not self-identify as such. If article is to be kept, prepare to see articles on the Anti-Palestine lobby in the US, the Anti-Arab lobby in the US, the Anti-Armenian lobby in the US, etc, etc., which use op-eds from the Palestinian, Arab and Armenian communities to label their opponents anti-them and which rely heavily on SYNTH to do so. In other words, keeping the article would set a very bad precedent out of line with Wiki policies and guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NCON)

Comment: as nom, also left out of nom that the pages very purpose is in violation of , as it is not neutral to label any of the organizations or people mentioned as anti-Israel as that is not how they are usually classified. A few people, mostly those who see these organizations and people as political adverseries, have used the term to describe them. The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee article shows how this is dealt with in a NPOV manner, with due weight given to the criticism. This article is being used to search high and low for somebody calling some organization "anti-Israel" and throw them all together into one big sinister bogeyman
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)