Deletion of Manna Music Inc

Comment: unless |citations from |reliable sources are added to comply with the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: while there are not a lot of good sources on the web, that is not surprising since this company has been out of business since before there was a web. Because of the notability of many of the label's artists, I think it passes . As for it being a copyvio, that is of course a '''huge''' problem, but the nom has not explained why they believe it to be one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Citations, reliable sources and verifiability are all grounds for improving this article. They are '''not''' acceptable grounds for deletion per #REASON and . I quote from the latter: ''If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD.'' The only relevant issue to consider here as far as I can see is whether the subject is notable. Winning an award for Gospel Publisher of the Year from the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers strikes me as being notable enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE)