Deletion of Emma Chamberlain

Comment: clearly meets .  Problems describes are endemic to WP pages
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: article subject meets . The  are https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomward/2018/09/25/dont-sleep-on-emma-chamberlain/#3ae4b2294e79 Forbes 2018, https://www.michigandaily.com/section/arts/meet-your-newest-it-girl-emma-chamberlain Michigan Daily 2019, and https://www.elle.com/culture/a27118338/emma-chamberlain-youtube-explain/ Elle 2019
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:THREE)

Comment: meets and , has a large "fan" base and has significant coverage by |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: This is pretty much . The coverage is trivial and despite its quantity there is a complete absence of depth; this is reflected in the page's contents. Claims such as the itunes podcast one are unsupported and seemingly promotional in nature (please advise which 50 countries). I looked at several of the articles which allegedly link back to this one and could not find any such links. Perhaps I misunderstand exactly what the 'whatlinkshere' function does but maybe someone can explain. Perhaps this is better suited for wikinews. It is not encyclopedic. There is not a single sentence in the article that is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: There is coverage that satisfies , and the promotional material has been removed recently
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  with significant secondary RS coverage. Subject is clearly notable with multiple awards. Article has been cleaned up and more content added. It also now has an expanded lede. Subject easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . She has a large following and is the recipient of multiple awards. Meets  based on news/press coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:BIO||WP:BASIC)

Comment: I worry that this AfD will be plagued with vandalism in a similar way to the article. However, I believe that this article should be kept per . A previous version of the article can be viewed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emma_Chamberlain&oldid=894393740 here that has no unsourced or promotional content. The sources in the article, along with many that can be found with a Google News search, show notability. If you think the lead is too short, I suggest you 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FIXIT)