Deletion of Swedish Erotica 12

Comment: in principle. Normally, I don’t care if an article on a pornographic movie/actor/actress/whatever survives or fails an AfD nomination. However, the nomination for this and the other pornography-related articles by this editor does not provide any substantive reasoning to support the allegation of insufficient notability. As a result, I am left to make assumptions, and the assumption I make is that the nomination is in some way related to censorship. #Wikipedia_is_not_censored| Wikipedia is not censored. Even if I |assume good faith, notability is a concern for any article, but it is not the sole criterion. Wikipedia:Notability is ''not'' policy or a guideline. The real question is: "''is it encyclopedic?''" In any event, this {{tl|stub}} article contains information that supports an allegation of notabilty. Based upon  and , this article may very well be. Without any other reason, I cannot support deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:AGF||WP:5P||WP:NOT)