Deletion of Black Identity Extremism

Comment: This article is a stub and fails . I suggest merging the news of the way a nonexistent category was briefly brought to life through an FBI report by including a few lines in the article on the FBI
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: The case for deletion needs to be based on Wikipedia policies which the article contravenes, and I am not seeing that here. Reliable sources exist. The article is on a notable subject, based on the amount of media coverage that exists. Is it a hoax? Well, a copy of the FBI report is available online - I am not qualified to say whether it was generated by the FBI or not. To me, it sounds like a case of |"I don't like it" or , neither of which are valid arguments. Wikipedia isn't into censorship. Whether or not the person who created the draft (which I |reviewed and accepted into mainspace) is an |SPA is neither here nor there; we should |assume good faith and treat the article on its merits. If the real issue is one of |neutrality then we should edit the article to make it more neutral, not delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDLI||WP:HARMFUL||WP:AFCP||WP:SPA||WP:AGF||WP:NPOV)