Deletion of StarCraft Diplomacy

Comment: a small summary to StarCraft per  and per proposed game notability guidelines.  Insufficient evidence of notability to pass .  Hasn't had broad influence like Counter-Strike.  Hasn't generated significant coverage in the Diplomacy (game) community nor in general gaming magazines professional enough to meet 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NET||WP:RS)

Comment: while "fancruft" is hardly a deletion criteria that should be taken seriously, there is a lack of application to , , notability, and . OR . Or even  a collection of Diplomacy remakes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WEB||WP:SOFTWARE||WP:NOT)

Comment: game guide in violation of , fails to demostrate |notability, and is mainly . Crufty, vanity, original research game guide = delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:OR)