Deletion of Microsoft Roslyn

Comment: In addition to ZDNet and InfoWorld, also coverage in Visual Studio Magazinehttp://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2012/06/05/roslyn-ctp-refresh-targets-visual-studio-2012-rc.aspxhttp://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2012/03/20/10-questions-10-answers-on-roslyn.aspx (an independent publication), The Registerhttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/03/visual_basic_c_sharp_future/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/20/microsoft_roslyn_ctp/, and Developer.comhttp://www.developer.com/net/an-introduction-to-microsoft-roslyn.html (part of QuinStreet).  Seems to be also coverage in ''Windows PowerShell for Developers'' (O'Reilly)http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/programming/microsoft-windows-powershell/9781449322694/8dot-dlls-types-properties-methods-and-microsoft-roslyn/chapter_8_dlls_types_propertiehttp://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yIL8goCG-nQC&lpg=PA115&ots=dyx_Ws9mid&dq=%22Microsoft%20Roslyn%22&pg=PA115#v=onepage&q=%22Microsoft%20Roslyn%22&f=false.  Being "overly technical" isn't grounds for deletion because it can be fixed by editing (read fD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: per the coverage in Visual Studio Magazine and ''The Register'' listed above. The topic passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)