Deletion of Gorgon (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: The primary sources are, of course, not valid as establishing notability.  Nor are the sources that are about actual, mythological creatures that may have inspired them, as they are not about the topic at all, and do not mention the D&D creature.  That basically just leaves the book mentioned by Daranios above that, when reading the text, is nothing but a straight description of what the monster is in the game, that provides no actual indication of notability and merely establishes that .  Thus, the creature fails the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS||WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters, though that article also has problems. Per Roshacma, the secondary sources provided do not do anything other than provide in-universe information, and therefore do not count towards . The references already in the article are either primary or do not actually relate to Dungeons & Dragons, and also do not contribute towards GNG. I could not find anything better with a search
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)