Deletion of Mari Ness

Comment: This is a brand-new article and a little bit of  should tune it up in no time. A publisher's affiliated blog is different from an amateur or promotional blog.  I'll pop over there and see if we can tune up the source material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: not terribly clear-cut, but nevertheless a keep. We lack a single big article that discusses her work and career, but rather we find a series of smaller reviews of the person and her writing. That is always a difficult call per . However, we also have , which offers supplementary criteria that help balance the fact that authors often receive less coverage in proportion to that given to their work than do pop stars, for example, who generally receive more personal attention than their songs themselves do. NAUTHOR offers criterion 4: {{tq|"The person's work ... has: ... won significant critical attention ..."}} and that doesn't seem to be in doubt judged by the sheer volume of independent reviews cited as sources in her article. Ness has also received attention as evidenced by being invited to speak at WorldCon. I reject the assertion that a convention of that importance in the field is merely a vehicle for self-promotion: it is clearly a major event attracting large audiences, and an invitation to speak indicates the prestige of the speaker. Taken together, that's more than enough to convince me that the article meets our notability requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NAUTHOR)