Deletion of Liam Patton

Comment: Patton appears in his club's hall of fame, which probably passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: They all fail  as they have never competed at a professioanl level, and a few quick Google searches don't appear to produce enough online sources to establish their notability in any other way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Kinsella meets  with significant news coverage, including this feature http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-60146003.html. Bulking different people like this isn't a good idea; each one is different. No prejudice on relisting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per nom; non-notable players who fail . The discussion you have directed us to Vintagekits seems to conclude that the LoI is NOT fully pro
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: per nom, namely  - no evidence the league was fully-pro at the time (and no evidence it is actually fully-pro at the present day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: certainly meets  criteria in its intentions. There is no necessity for LoI to be professional for these athletes to be considered notable, they certainly played at the highest national level, which is the clear intention behind the guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: no indication of notability; fails  over prof status. Is it just me or is wikipedia being overrun with frivolous sports bio articles. It is in danger of turning into a directory of every man who has kicked a ball around a field while anyone was watching
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)