Deletion of The Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon

Comment: I think, that the assertion is that this book what is talked about in this article Golden_plates#.22Sealed.22_portion which is the subject tons of notable works but not the same thing. The book referred to in this article doesn't even have passing mentions except on a couple of websites. A search of http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=wikipedia&q=isbn%3A9780978526467 worldcat only shows it in 3 libraries in the entire US (I'm not sure how to search in the entire world). It is also self published http://pearlpublishing.net/store/index.htm publisher website. Totally fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Webtraffic is barely a factor in  and this isnt even a web content article, it's a published (albeit self published) book and books have to meet  (which is a subset of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree with the many editors who have pointed out the non-notability and lack of |reliable sources about this book.  The book appears to be eminently non-notable.  I couldn't find a single news article that discusses the book or the controversy associated with it.  Christopher Nemelka does not appear in any news articles.  '''HOWEVER''', the concept of "The Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon" is notable. (See, for example, http://www.mormontimes.com/article/8643/studies/mormon%20q&a) It is this particular book that claims to be "Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon" that is non-notable.  Thus, it would be legitimate to have an article under this title that discusses the concept of "The Sealed Portion of the Book of Mormon".  The material from http://www.mormontimes.com/article/8643/studies/mormon%20q&a could form the basis for such an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)