Deletion of Agency Republic

Comment: strongly.  This is outrageous |spam.  The lede calls this an ''interactive communications agency'', but fortunately the infobox mentions advertising as what they actually do.  This goes on to say it's ''(c)reatively-driven, with a focus on Research & Development'' and ''exists to create world class interactive ideas...'', which is no doubt all very nice and |means exactly nothing.  This rubbish has got to go, and ought to have been #G11|speedily deleted no matter how notable they might be.  And don't try to tell me that it could be fixed by editing: '''''this''''' whole text needs to be deleted; and business to business firms with purely intangible assets and no brick and mortar presence really aren't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:NONSENSE||WP:CSD)

Comment: I had originally suggested speedy deletion based on my belief that this page #G11|''would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic''.  However, now that we are here, I also believe it does not meet |general notability.  References by ''Brand Republic'', ''Campaign Magazine'' and ''Marketing Magazine'' are the same articles across multiple sites - which are in turn part of the same group of websites.  Other sources I have found are all similarly on this group of sites (which includes ''Media Week'' and ''Revolution'').  IMO this does not constitute multiple, independent sources - but is really one news source.  The remaining award listings are little more than passing mentions - and are not necessarily notable awards themselves to make the company pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)