Deletion of References to the board game Risk in popular culture

Comment: It shouldn't be in either the fork or the main article IMHO; it doesn't improve Risk (game) (on the contrary, as b_cubed pointed out), and it shouldn't be in it's own article. Even if it should have an article all to itself, it's unsourced (fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: this is a detached |trivia section and is unencyclopedic because it is an #IINFO|indiscriminate list with no context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:AVTRIV||WP:NOT)

Comment: per Ptkfgs and '''strongly don't merge''' per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: A section of the main article that should never have existed has somehow snowballed into this grotesque cruft fork. If a board game has had a lasting, significant cultural impact -- like chess or go -- then an encyclopedic discussion of that impact is warranted. Under no circumstances should an encyclopedia contain a bulleted list of instances in which its topic was briefly referenced in popular media. This is |trivia and is not appropriate here. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)