Deletion of Eku Edewor

Comment: albeit weakly) per the sources and arguments of {{reply|Darreg|Versace1608}}; a  https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Eku+Edewor&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=dDZBWYTAJM7U8geIirKABw#q=%22Eku+Edewor%22&tbm=nws&start=0 does indicate a degree of  coverage. On another note, there does seem to be what might amount to ing occuring here; so I will probably not watchlist this page. Cheers!  &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PERSISTENT||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: As per Nominator said, also a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources is yet to be found, from thorough research carried out my observation is ; the few reliable sources mentioning or discussing her are not independent of the subject hence we have a  at hand, for example; her workplace mentioning or putting articles about her(their staff) on cyberspace should not be considered as part of reliable source even though it is a reputable organization. Even at that she has not even been discussed with  Let this fact be committed to our minds
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: what nominator said, The subject of the article fails primary notability requirements such as  and also, the references/sources which are provided in the article are not of reliabe press, they do not discuss her significantly, and the few which attempt to do so, are not independent of her, hence we have a  which could distrupt NPOV so hereby failing  woefully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:COI||WP:GNG)

Comment: in the establishment of notability for any giving article of living persons, significant coverage in reliable sources is required. Now, as per  the subject of our discussion seems to be lacking greatly here in the sense that even the good sources presented of recent do not with indepth discuss her. It is as though all just make mere announcements of her without speaking of anything really tangible. A delete !vote still is most feasible course of action
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: u|Darreg}} has provided sufficient sources to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)