Deletion of The Simpsons (season 30)

Comment: season has already started airing, and the rationale provided by the nominator would mean this would back into the article space pretty soon anyway (which would be a total waste of time). This page can and should be worked on in the state its in now. This isn't a case of  or anything even close to the sort
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I really don't see why this shouldn't be kept, got all the other season pages, although it's a bit heavy of citations from twitter I am sure it will be populated quickly over the next few weeks and sorted out.  isn't quite there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There has never been a requirement that a season article has to have more than what this article contains. It's desirable but not mandatory and the proposer has been around long enough to know that. I've supported redirection or deletion of articles that don't meet the minimum that we expect, and I've redirected plenty myself. The general consensus is that season articles have substantial content outside of an episode table ''or'' a sourced episode table. The article has a sourced episode table supported by 25 sources so there is no real justification in deleting it. |"I don't like it" is not a valid reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)