Deletion of Wajas

Comment: fails , Wiki is #INFO|not a game guide/instruction manual (point 5), and notability ain't asserted with secondary sources ("''All of my information was obtained from the website itself and user-made walkthroughs''" – that's the problem) before referring to the primary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT)

Comment: This is really a nicely written article, and so one may wonder what harm it does to Wikipedia. I will try to explain to the creators of the article why many of us are voting delete here. Well, we need to draw the line somewhere, or we should allow nicely done entries on every website, or any online community. The document describing what Wikipedia is trying to do is the official policy called |What Wikipedia is Not. Specifically, Wikipedia is not an Internet Guide: ''"Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance."'' This is why the important criteria for keeping an article is that we need non-trivial coverage in ''intellectually independent'' sources. This typically means news coverage, or mention in books about internet phenomena, and so on. I hope this helps explain why we can't keep this otherwise very nice article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)