Deletion of Bill Clinton haircut controversy

Comment: Not sure about this one. The incident seems to have garnered direct coverage in RS, which would seemly pass . Hard to say this is a case of , since we're talking about something that took place in 1993. Some of the nom's  examples are good. But that said, this incident seems more substantial than Obama swatting a fly on national TV, and a little less silly than an article about Michelle's arms
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: as creator per . I agree that we should only look for sourcing since 1993, but there are three reliable post-1993 sources in the article providing significant coverage. See also http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/09/us/politics/09pelosi.html here and http://boingboing.net/2014/10/20/budget-cuts-aboard-air-force-o.html here for examples of how it continues to be referred to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Not sure which Clinton article it should go in, maybe other editors have a better handle on that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)