Deletion of Peter Scholze

Comment: As the article creator recently noted on Talk:Peter Scholze, the subject is the 2011 Clay Research Fellow.  This seems to be more significant, but I am not certain if brings the article to passing 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I added a source but I don't think it's enough for  (the only relevant criterion since  seems far out of reach), and I couldn't find much more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: only a PhD student, not even close to passing , no published papers, only three preprints and only a few citations . Student level awards and fellowships are explicitly excluded in  from indicating academic notability. The Clay fellowships are meant to support finishing graduate students, based on the promise of future accomplishments, not on being notable already
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: I don't get a lot of Google Scholar hits for the subject (with very few citations each), although I don't want to claim great accuracy in my GS search, since the name "Scholze" is very common.  In light of the difficulty in sifting through the results, I refined the search to the past six years (and given that the subject's area is the Langland's program and Shimura varieties, I searched for related terms).  A typical result was this search http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Peter+Scholze+shimura&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C39&as_ylo=2005&as_yhi=2011&as_vis=0. I was only able to turn up three papers, only one of which seems to have any citations.  MathSciNet doesn't list ''any'' publications of the subject (he does have an MR number though: 890936).  It seems to me that, although the Clay Institute seems to feel that the subject ''shows promise'' as a potential young researcher, he does not yet have enough of a research record to meet the requirements set forth at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)