Deletion of Machosexual (2nd nomination)

Comment: Obvious  failure. Also Wikipedia is not a dictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: term has  articles where it is the primary topic. http://www.rd.com/content/openContent.do?contentId=28684http://travel.guardian.co.uk/article/2005/mar/27/observerescapesectionhttp://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=2092965&page=1 (sorta) In fact, the Reader's Digest is so stodgy I think them devoting an article to a neologism is almost acceptance ''per se''. My major problem with the term is dicdef
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)