Deletion of Wah Yan College Cats

Comment: deletion debates have nothing to do with whether people "want this to represent animal shelters in Hong Kong". Linking this from Cruelty to animals is a pretty clear example of Wikipedia:Reliable_sources_and_undue_weight|undue weight, but the decision to keep or delete this article rests on the usual criteria , , . Though IMO this is a perfect example of something that's newsworthy but not encyclopedically notable, it should at least be given a mention (and the sources from this article attached) on the Wah Yan College page, given that it is the subject of articles in two mainstream HK newspapers (South China Morning Post and Ming Pao), which is more notice than most secondary school organisations usually attract
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: to Wah Yan College, Hong Kong - although it may not have gained enough notablility, however, per  and : "''One common recommendation across all notability guidelines is not to nominate articles on such subjects for deletion but to rename, refactor, or merge them into articles with broader scopes, or into the articles that discuss the main subject, which may be created if they do not already exist.''"; "''If a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, it often makes sense to merge it with a page on a broader topic.''" I think it is possible to merge it with an article of broader scope, in this case, Wah Yan College, Hong Kong
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:MERGE)