Deletion of Jolla

Comment: The reasons for the alleged non-notability and thus for the proposed deletion are invalid per Wikipedia policy: "A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources." (see ). The article properly cites this signifant coverage in (reliable) secondary sources, thus it's notable, thus the article should not be deleted. As for most of this information being repeated from the company press releases, tweets and CEO interviews, I'd expect that to be the case for many company articles and I see no problem as long as reliable secondary sources vet this information provided by the company itself. (Self-published information is not denied by Wikipedia policy per se, see e.g. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SELFSOURCE)

Comment: The reasons for the alleged non-notability and thus for the proposed deletion are invalid per Wikipedia policy: "A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources." (see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)