Deletion of Alex Wissner-Gross

Comment: Fails rof#C1 with inadequate cites. Far too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: To me, major profiles in http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2001-07-15/what-this-teenager-did-on-his-summer-vacation BusinessWeek and the http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/05/a-grand-unified-theory-of-everything.html New Yorker, as well as articles about Wissner-Gross and his work in http://techcrunch.com/2009/01/12/revealed-the-times-made-up-that-stuff-about-google-and-the-tea-kettles/ Tech Crunch, http://www.technewsworld.com/story/65794.html Technewsworld.com, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7823387.stm BBC http://io9.com/how-skynet-might-emerge-from-simple-physics-482402911 io9, http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/science/07/10/green.internet.CO2/index.html?eref=rsstech CNN, http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2013/04/21/from-atoms-to-bits-physics-shows-entropy-as-the-root-of-intelligence/ Forbes, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/3314491/Students-try-to-make-internet-carbon-neutral.html The Telegraph http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2009/01/12/203534/internet-google-carbon-footprint-alex-wissner-gross-myth/ ThinkProgress http://www.pcworld.com/article/156893/article.html PC World etc. etc. clearly meet the . Certainly I've seen articles kept with far less press in national media. Also, I disagree with claims that he is notable for a single event, when the articles are from a period of nearly 20 years and from at least three separate theories (nanotechnology, carbon emissions, and the physics theory
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Appears to be known only for a single meaningless concatenation of symbols with the visual appearance of a mathematical equation. Despite what appears to be very heavy self-promotion, I don't think that should be good enough for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: as above, has had a very good career trajectory so far, if he continues at the same rate he'll probably meet  at a point 15-25 years from now.  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Far short of academic notability, and could not find independent verification of  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  per low h-index of 5. The self-promotion, press releases, and non-notable prizes don't contribute to  either. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.14.65|101.119.14.65
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: May not meet , but meets  or . There are numerous articles from separate publications that cover him and his work in depth: starting with http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2001-07-15/what-this-teenager-did-on-his-summer-vacation BusinessWeek and http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/05/a-grand-unified-theory-of-everything.html the New York (both very in-depth articles). Also articles in http://techcrunch.com/2009/01/12/revealed-the-times-made-up-that-stuff-about-google-and-the-tea-kettles/ Tech Crunch, http://www.technewsworld.com/story/65794.html Technewsworld.com, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7823387.stm BBC and so on. Last few sources aren't as in depth, but taken together, especially with first two, suggests that he meets notability requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)