Deletion of Affinity (band)

Comment: The band released an album on Vertigo, got plenty of coverage at the time, contained otherwise-notable members, and sources are sufficient to pass both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Not only is this an incomplete and unsigned nomination. It's also a bad faith one. Nominator is a new editor whose 2nd edit is to put together this badly formatted AfD. I suspect this SPA is a sock of {{User|Yiwentang}} who has a propensity for attempting to disrupt and wreck articles I've had input on or have created. Regardless, Affinity are a band that meet the requirements of  regardless of whether or not the article contains references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: There is clearly a onflict as the author – webhamster has never previously declared his interest as the bands  designer behind the release of a “5-CD limited” issue. Neither of its two obscure references are verifiable or trustworthy as both are promotional in nature.  It is an advert masquerading as an article with external link spamming. How can there be any  for statements such as "''This delighted the band as it would give them a stepping stone to further fame, and although it didn't pay that well they did "get to see incredible jazz artists every night — for free!"'' This article does not cite any references or sources for 99% of its content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:V)

Comment: Band clearly does not satisfy . It contains not a single  source, and they are totally Non notable per . as an aside, in my opinion, given that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:V||WP:N)