Deletion of $uicideBoy$

Comment: Fails  |at this time. Maybe when more reliable, non-self published sources become available, then the article can be recreated, but until then, delete. Also I should note that I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/$UICIDEBOY$|an earlier AfD about the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: You know, I think that the notability of this is better than some articles on here. However, due to , it must be deleted, unless we use . Keep in mind Letter and Spirit of the Law. I vote to keep, while totally agreeing with Jergling on the fact that it does infringe upon NPOV quite a lot. It appears that a major edit is taking place, so perhaps the NPOV can be fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:IAR)

Comment: The article does not seem to fit  standards. Failure to meet  is arguable, however I do not believe that it meets that standard either. A quick read through the article also brings up NPOV issues. This article fails too many of Wikipedia's standards for there to be a good reason to keep it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:N)

Comment: Regarding the #G4, the deleted version of the article is similar to this one; however as that AfD did not close with a straight "delete" consensus, but was short-circuited via another admin speedying it, I can't in good conscience delete it under that criteria when somebody has !voted "keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: They got there EP to chart http://www.billboard.com/charts/rap-albums/2016-08-13?order=gainer here, which meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: No assertion of notability. Evan, please try to understand the policy here: Wikipedia is not judging $uicideBoy$, we're assessing the media surrounding them. No news outlets, professional reviewers, or industry groups have recognized the band, so we won't keep an article about them. The article itself also violates |Neutral Point of View by using fluffy prose like "dark blend of horrorcore glitch-trap bubbling with booming bass, ominous atmospherics, and occultish, drugged-out rhymes". We don't allow self-published content like that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: does not meet  at this time. I removed the "inuse" template since the user who placed it is blocked, and it's been a few hours without any edits to the article since it was put there anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)