Deletion of List of Christian Science tenets, prayers, and statements

Comment: OR based solely on primary sources. There is no way to judge the significance of individual list items without reliable secondary sources, and I doubt that any exist on which a list like this can be constructed. Also, a not very useful content fork of the main article on Christian Science. Falls afoul of , and amounts to little more than promotion. Nothing worth merging elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: or '''Merge''' I have to agree with Clariosophic on this one. At the very least, the article can be merged or redirected back to the original Christian Science articles. Or an ambitious scholar on the subject can probably expand on the subject further. I am not seeing a case of  here, but rather 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: or '''Merge''': I fail to see how  is applicable. The 3 main quotes in the article were copied from either Christian Science or Church of Christ, Scientist in order to reduce the size of those articles. Wikipedia has articles on Hebrew or Christian beliefs, creeds, prayers, etc. Although I grew up in the Christian Science church, I now belong to a main line Christian church and am not an apologist for Christian Science, nor am I an opponent of it. Most Wikipedians know absolutely nothing about Christian Science. What is the big deal about primary sources? There are many secondary sources on Christian Science such as Mark Twain's book of that title and many others, pro and con. If you want to quote a Bible text, you go to the Bible, not to a secondary source for a paraphrase
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)