Deletion of Vulcan starships

Comment: This article is almost wholly constitutive of |plot, with no evidence of having received any significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|secondary sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: I seconded the prod, which was contested.  I'm not sure this is very controversial.  They might have some coverage in that book by the Okuda's but I doubt it since the first real mention of those ships (well, not really a mention) was in First Contact.  Cites primary sources and fansites.  Consists entirely of |plot repetition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: Fails , in that there does not seem to be any mention of these ships in independent sources. I always provide some leeway for lists ... if someone could even manage to demonstrate that anyone outside of the universe had even made a writeup that went into any detail at all about Vulcan ships, I'd switch to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: along with the other crufty ship list articles in the nav template '''or delete''' because of , , OT#PLOT,  etc. It's only fair to apply policies and guidelines to highly populuar fiction franchises as well, but I can see how a combined ST Starship list would still be beneficial to wikipedia. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:UNDUE||WP:NOT||WP:SYNTH)