Deletion of Trump Force One

Comment: per the Daily Mail source (as painful as it is, it satisfies GNG). I would discount sources that are newer than a year or so as  coverage of Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, but that does not empty the reference section. Not much opposition to a merge and redirect to Donald Trump, but the target article is one of those from the "permanently too long" category. Standalone notability + no good way to merge = article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Few reliable sources for this tabloid-style media-hyped article. No substantial coverage to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393705/Trump-force-The-Donald-shows-gaudy-new-100-million-presidential-757-jet.html this Daily Mail source has been https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trump_Force_One&type=revision&diff=717890574&oldid=716995426 removed on the grounds of , which is quite wrong IMO since BLP guidelines do not apply to a plane. The thing is that it is the best source in here, since it was published in 2011, way before the 2016 presidential campaign
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPSOURCES)

Comment: Is it ACTUAALLY named Trump Force One?? or is that just media hype? A non-notable aircraft. Mention could be made on DT's page but no need for a full-blown article on a subject that has virtually no direct references!! , plus who the hell cares
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: snds}}and expand with any solid references among all those references. The batch of references in the References section needs to be refactored to be inline, or they are nearly meaningless and at this point acting as a defacto bibliography. For the number of editors involved in this article, it is poorly written, and poorly constructed, but that is not grounds for deletion. Needs a good dose of  and . Cheers! &#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)

Comment: this http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/politics/donald-trumps-aging-air-fleet-gives-his-bid-and-his-brand-a-lift.html?_r=0 New York Times article is unambiguously about the plane, pointing out and profiling "Trump Force One" specifically. While the plane seems odd and non-notable, we at Wikipedia don't judge notability, secondary sources do; we just report what they choose to cover. I don't think  applies as there has been attention to Trump's plane for almost as long as he's been running for president, nearly a year (as well as some coverage before
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)