Deletion of Islam and Terrorism: What the Quran Really Teaches About Christianity, Violence and the Goals of the Islamic Jihad (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom (and per DGG - rarely do I see a delete !vote Image:Face-smile.svg|20px) as it fails all the criterias at . It would help the editors who are advocating 'keep' if they showed how it meets the  &  criterias instead of raising arguments for  and . Also, |canvassing (or what can be deemed canvassing) is not the best approach and can be seen as disruptive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:N||WP:BK||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:CANVASS)

Comment: No notability asserted. Probably because there don't seem to be any reliable independent sources disscussing the book. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Not discussed by reliable sources , doesn't to have made much ripples in the world; you find only a couple of forums and two or three mentiong it through googling, all of them utterly unnoticeable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as a complete failure of .  If
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The book's content is irrelevant, what matters is that the article definitely fails to illustrate that the book meets the notability criteria in  and therefore it cannot remain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)