Deletion of Black Eyed Kids (3rd nomination)

Comment: no evidence of notability as shown in coverage by reliable sources. Possible candidate for speedy deletion under , but as it's been taken to AFD we may as well let it be discussed here instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: the sourcing is inadequate to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've noticed sources being listed above, but if you visit the sites, it becomes evident that many of are not considered reliable per . These articles are clearly unreliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I don't see one single source in the article, or in the links provided just above, that meets  (a book that is "published" does not automatically make it a reliable source). If this were truly notable, it would have been covered by reliable sources. For those reasons, it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: as the article fails  and . The "reliable sources" found above are not reliable. The content guideline being used to support retention of the article requires at least one reliable source, which none of the above are. Sorry, I can't agree to keep this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: I can find only one reliable source, from http://books.google.com/books?id=eCQ_rQmzqfgC&pg=PA30&dq=%22black+eyed+kids%22&hl=en&ei=gjTNTMXOPIGClAeu5IXlCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAA Weird U.S. the Odd-yssey Continues (which has already been mentioned in the article). There's another source from http://books.google.com/books?id=NEJn465WvQMC&pg=PA168&dq=%22black+eyed+kids%22&hl=en&ei=gjTNTMXOPIGClAeu5IXlCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ Teen Websters, but despite the misleading name, a quick search on the publisher indicates that the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_M._Parker#Online_dictionary content was lifted directly off Wikipedia. There are no relevant/reliable http://www.google.com/search?q=%22black+eyed+kids%22&hl=en&safe=off&rlz=1T4TSNA_enUS385US385&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=3TbNTLmiE8H_lgf4oL3oCA&ved=0CBEQpwU news sources, which is surprising, considering the media are usually gung-ho on stories about paranormal claims. One source is not enough to meet  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)