Deletion of Hot Lap Dance Club

Comment: non-notable per , as the only assertable importance is due to the shutdown, and not from the existence of the business itself. Also a case of  due to lack of anything substantive in terms of controversy, legal precedent, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: So  — a strip club that gets busted for ''also'' engaging in prostitution ≤ "Man bites dog (journalism)|dog bites man
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Standard .  A club where people have sex with alleged prostitutes gets busted?  Stop the presses! {{facepalm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The Article indicates that the Hot Lap Dance Club was rated by respected strip club industry websites as one of the top strip clubs in the United States (if not the world).  The lawsuit by a customer over a dancer received worldwide media attention.  The prostitution trial of the 2 dancers at the club was a rarity as most prostitution offenses are pleaded out to a minor offense.  A criminal court Judge threw out the cases against both dancers and now one of the dancers is suing the City of New York for $5 million dollars.  There are over 300 references to the "Hot Lap Dance Club" in a Google search and clearly the article meets standards for inclusion under  as it is sufficiently sourced and independently notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Definitely a case of , especially since the "controversial" part of the sting operation is not substantiated. Also, "worldwide media attention"? New York is not the world. Attampt at embellishment to create notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Not notable, .  After clean up efforts, it is still sourced to blogs, non-RS sites and user-generated sites for much of the information and still contains some original research and synthesis such as the prosecutor's "erroneous" use of a particular assertion. If stubbed via removal of all improperly sourced information, would be clearer than ever that we are dealing with  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: it appears to have continuing coverage only as |tangentially related to the site where arrests occurred. the "sources" for the awards/ranking and the rankings/awards themselves are dubious at being those that would meet  as significant industry awards - theres a billion and one porn men's lifestyle sites, and each and every one hands out "best of". Special:Contributions/Active_Banana|''Active
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:N)