Deletion of Long Dong Silver (3rd nomination)

Comment: The only reason the 640 sources I found in a Google news search aren't being used is that someone, I really don't know who and don't care to check, had this article previously be an attack against Clarence Thomas, which was later removed. While the Clarence Thomas speech controversy is important to the subject, it has to be properly worded and used and not given too much  weight in the article. I'm thinking two sentences or so should be fine. Nonetheless, this porn actor is notable. The usual awards requirements don't really apply, as his major films that he acted in were before award ceremonies like AVN existed. So it makes things rather different. But, as the sources and other things show, this performer is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: clearly satisfies . —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Quoting my comment from the previous 2 AFDs:) This subject has sufficient reliablly sourced information for a stand-alone article. I demonstrated in the first AFD that  is easily satisfied, to wit: 'Verified by its discussion in reference to the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. CNN's http://edition.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/07/05/billpress.column/ "Bill Press: The return of Long Dong Silver"(2001) says that Anita Hill testified that Thomas harassed female workers in part by describing porn videos he had watched "including the now-famous 'Long Dong Silver.'" If CNN says it is famous, that goes a long way toward establishing notability. Google News archive has many other articles discussing the film. See Google News archive https://www.google.com/search?q=%22long+dong+silver%22&ie=UTF-8&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#pq=%22long+dong+silver%22&hl=en&ds=n&cp=29&gs_id=3l&xhr=t&q=%22long+dong+silver%22+-wikipedia&tok=NEg_a_kOUWmLj9PCijhPJw&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&safe=off&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=%22long+dong+silver%22+-wikipedia&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=cc38dd5dfa83c8f0&biw=1244&bih=853 (less Wikipedia-related results), particularly Pioneer Press (St. Paul Pioneer Press, Dec. 28, 1991, page 10B "Who's in, who's out on the In list:... Long Dong Silver") http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=PD&s_site=twincities&p_multi=SP&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB5DB6ACA3B1515&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM. Washington Post http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-918400.html called Silver "a well known performer."  Rocky Mountain News http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=RM&p_theme=rm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB4DF3120EA7ADC&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM says Silver was well known even before the Thomas hearings. Time magazine(1998) http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,987752,00.html called Silver "a household name." ' The article was censored by well intentioned editors to prevent it being a "coat rack" attacking Thomas, but some mention of "Long Dong's" role in the Thomas confirmation hearings is appropriate and encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)