Deletion of Adrian Lang

Comment: Changing my vote, the sources looked good, but really aren't, so they probably fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: To expand a bit, Ms. Lang may be a fantastic lawyer and a role model, but that doesn't make her sufficiently notable for WP. We usually look for significant coverage in secondary sources. Here, we see almost entirely primary sources: Ms. Lang's Twitter, the websites of organizations of which Ms. Lang is a member, Ms. Lang's employer. The only secondary source seems to be a picture of Ms. Lang taken at an event, which does not have any commentary attached. It looks to me from usernames like the many of the folks above are lawyers, so I'd encourage them to read the guidelines at  and consider how they apply to this case. I certainly don't want folks to get the idea that I've nominated this because I have ill will toward Ms. Lang or Canada. That's not what this is about
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails   the award from the  Canadian Corporate Counsel is not sufficient and and none of the other references give indepth coverage about the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: given the recent influx of new accounts to this AFD I have added a "not a ballot" template to the top of this discussion and tagged two apparent |SPAs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)