Deletion of Paul Ulrich

Comment: I would have also included '''Blacksmith Books''' (the Hong Kong based publisher) in this nomination as well ... it has an identical  problem because it was created by the same author around the same time (each one attempting to add verisimilitude to the others), while totally lacking any  to satisfy . &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:A||WP:CORP)

Comment: notability possibility (as a debut novelist) marginal at best and there are no sources.  nips any charitable impulse in the bud
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I understand that Nury Vittachi is a notable Hong Kong writer, but using something on his blog as a source isn't really reliable. Either way, it fails  for lack of other coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: You make it sound like I did a ''Bad Thing'' ... I deleted what I believe most editors will agree is a http://www.saudibritishsociety.org.uk/pictures/Dunes.pdf spam link to a PDF order form for a book titled ''Beyond the Dunes'', with the edit summary, ''replaced  with {{cn}} -- a link to the order form for a book is not a  citation for a claim of "only novel ..."'' If it had been under '''External links''', then I might have left it alone, but it was being used as a citation/reference for the very first sentence of the article: '''''Saudi Match Point''''' is the only novel originally written in English and set entirely in modern-day Saudi Arabia or its immediate neighbors on the Arabian peninsula.1A claim ''that'' grandiose requires a , and the ''order form'' for a 552 page book that allegedly contains erification of that claim just isn't a , IMHO, although a proper {{tl|cite book}} with a page number is ... after I confirmed {{ISBN|1850439729}} on Amazon.com, I noticed that Amazon said that ''Beyond the Dunes'' was published "July 27, 2006", but the article says that ''Saudi Match Point'' was publish "April 2007" ... so instead of replacing the EL with a {{tl|cite book}} (I ''still'' might have done it if Breezer84 had just provided a specific ''page number'' to cite), I chose to replace it with a {{cn}} tag ... anybody else have a problem with that? &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS)