Deletion of Oscar love curse

Comment: WP:PROFRINGE nonsense with serious |BLP issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: as . If it wasn't such an obvious crock of shite, I'd have blanked the entire 'occurrences' and 'exceptions' as soon as I saw it, as lacking citations, and accordingly a violation of  policy: "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately". Claiming that this 'curse' exists and affects named living individuals is contentious. Stupid, but also contentious, since it is utterly wrong-headed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BLP)

Comment: I'm not interested in celebrity gossip journalism, but it definitely exists. While the sources used would be absurd for an article on most subjects, for an article on pop culture, these may be usable. Still, it would be nice to find some |secondary sources which analyze the "curse" claim at a register that was a bit higher than supermarket tabloid. We have ''one'' source which kinda does that, but I'm not seeing many others. Signal to noise is a problem as most sources which talk about this are exactly at the supermarket tabloid level
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS)