Deletion of Pincus v. Yahoo! Inc.

Comment: can those proposing a redirect explain the value they perceive in redirecting to an article that does not discuss the subject?  edirects are cheap, of course, but if the redirect has no value (indeed a negative value, in that it misleadingly suggests to a reader that the target has something to do with what they searched for or clicked on), it's not a matter of whether it's cheap, it's whether it's helpful or the opposite
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: to Criticism of Yahoo! or '''delete'''.  If it turns out to have lasting significance, it can always be documented there.  Otherwise, it should probably just be deleted.  I agree with the nom that this article trips several red flags, including  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWS)