Deletion of List of the writings of William Monahan (second nomination)

Comment: Ample reliable and verifiable sources demonstrate notability of the list. I don't buy the "offsetting penalties" logic in implying that two people canvassing opposing sides of the debate cancels out the issue. It would seem that both parties have violated 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS)

Comment: disruptive to reopen so quickly; also, please indicate how this fails #DIRECTORY - do you believe all articles listing works by an author are somehow "directories?"  Likewise, notability is criteria for the subject of the article, and I note this subject has a feature article that recently ran on the front page - he is notable.  Please, to bring something again this quickly you should have some new information or change in analysis, not just a desire to try again. These points were vetted before
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I feel this article is an unnecessary list of writings with little or no significance.  The important ones should be placed in the main William Monahan Article, and this silly list and its redirects get deleted.  #DIRECTORY|Wikipedia isn't a directory, and I'd say that this qualifies as a directory.  It might not be a phonebook but it simply lists writings which do not have their own articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: too soon to open a new AfD, even if there is no fixed policy common sense dictates that some time must pass. As far as  goes it's important to note that it is the article subject that needs to be notable, not everything in the article (#Notability guidelines do not directly limit article content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE)