Deletion of Chakra GNU/Linux

Comment: There isn't even enough reliable source material to determine an article title that is consistent with usage in reliable English-language sources. The cited sources call this topic by various names.  I don't think we can hang our hat solely on jeffhoogland.blogspot.com and DistroWatch|distrowatch.com, even assuming they provided enough reliable source material for the article.  Content source blogs and other websites generally do not need to make the hard inclusion/exclusion decisions of paper print media. Per Pnm, perhaps start by adding a well-referenced section on {{noredirect|KDEmod}} to Arch Linux. You can make redirects to that and eventually  a topic if needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: I have just added the main Distrowatch profile page to the article. This confirms the notability of this distribution to the standard required at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Pnm hits the spot with his evaluation of the sources. There is no sign of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" which means the article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sources are limited to the product website, a blog and a directory-type listing. This fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)