Deletion of Tobis Portuguesa

Comment: per meeting  even if only in |Portugese. To the nominator, |research shows sources to be available, and I offer that |notability is dependent upon sources being available, and not upon them being used. Being |"unsourced for years" is not a deletion rationale. Notability in and even if only to Portugal and in Portugese is perfectly fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NONENG||WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE||WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: via .  The organization was apparently the subject of a documentary, that documentary and the organization are discussed http://www.c7nema.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2795:doclisboa-2010-tobis-portuguesa-por-joao-miranda here, additional sources that appear reliable and provide arguably in-depth coverage include http://www.rtp.pt/noticias/index.php?article=355216&tm=4&layout=122&visual=61, http://hardmusica.pt/noticia_detalhe.php?cd_noticia=5666, http://www.destak.pt/artigo/60260, http://books.google.com/books?id=oboxWAqj37UC&pg=PA24&dq=%22Tobis+Portuguesa%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lj4NUeamE8r4qAHW8YDQDQ&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Tobis%20Portuguesa%22&f=false, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/en/2011/10/24/portuguese-cinema-company-tobis-portuguesa-bought-by-angolan-investors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)