Deletion of Florence Devouard (3rd nomination)

Comment: Per nom, and  and research of UserIP-86.17.222.157. The French title itself is insignificant and trivial. The previous nomination was inconclusive and contained remarks like ''We extend this favour to Wikipedians with marginal notability. (Not marginally notable non-Wikipedians, though. We take care of our own)'' and then ''If we extend this courtesy to insiders, we should treat non-Wikipedians with the same level of respect''. Is there now some binding policy either way that some Wikipedians are more notable than non-Wikipedians or other less insider Wikipedians
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per  and rational provided in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence Devouard  |previous nomination and subsequent withdrawal in 2015 by {{ping|Carrite
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I explained above that being a ''chevalier'', the lowest level of membership, in the ''Ordre national du Mérite'', is not enough to confer notability, and I can't find any independent reliable sources that actually write anything substantial ''about'' Florence Devouard rather than just quote her. The claim above that the nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption is simply ridiculous, but my opinion here means that even if that was a valid claim  point 2 is no longer valid, because that point requires that "no uninvolved editor has recommended deletion as an outcome of the discussion". I am uninvolved and have now done that. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SKCRIT)

Comment: based on the impropriety of the nomination. ''Cf.''  point 2. I do not make such an accusation lightly, but I believe it's necessary and justified in this case. The nominator's Special:Contributions/Mohsinpathania|contributions to English Wikipedia raise questions: few new users begin their editing careers by nominating multiple articles for deletion. But far more troubling is his record on Commons, where, two days before bringing this AfD, he was {{plain link |url=//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:Mohsinpathania |name=blocked indefinitely}} as an account "used ''exclusively'' for disruption" (emphasis added
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SKCRIT)