Deletion of Gigaset Communications

Comment: this is a pretty simply keep in my opinion.  If the nominator had taken the time to simply go to the company's website, it would become clear that this is a multinational subsidiary of Siemens, one of the largest electronics conglomerates in the world.  This specific business and its products are covered in a variety of publications in English as well as a wide variety of other languages http://news.google.com/news?num=30&hl=en&um=1&tab=wn&nolr=1&q=gigaset,http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=gigaset&srchst=cse and therefore passes .  As far as the other indictment, interestingly, the article is not even particularly ''salesy'' in tone.  The article is unreferenced (not counting the links to the company's website) which needs to be fixed.  However if the issue with an article is "advertising" as the nominator suggests the correct course of action per #Special note: advertising and promotion is as follows
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CORP)

Comment: Article needs reliable sources, but it meets : listed in http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=25315097 Business Week
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)