Deletion of Rodd Wolff

Comment: Nearly half of the listed sources are literally only trivial mentions including as part of listings, it's not significant nor convincing for notability.  is important as it in fact be used over WP:BASIC or WP:GNG which are not policy, but  in fact is. This current article has only had 1 significant claim and that's a Hall of Fame. Simply because a person familiar with him may search him here is not a convincing basis of keeping an article especially if it's not satisfying policy . Also, the "has had significant roles" is not applicable as '''he's only an stuntman''', not an actor, hence he's only a background worker
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)