Deletion of Descendants of Major Nazis

Comment: Looking at the Wikipedia guidance and instructions, I have one further comment about this.  What we have here is basically an index-list article.  The original nominator of the article deletion stated "article simply resynthesises existing material from other articles" - however that is what a list article does - the entire purpose of a list article is to index existing articles into sections for better location and study.  There is nothing in  which states that it a valid deletion to delete an article.  Furthermore, a LOT of this seems to be stemming from the subject matter and (dare I say) personal feelings about this.  While I can understand that, distaste of a topic is not a valid deletion reason - neither is fear of future possibilities of vandalism as was brought up also.  On top of all of this, the article is also technically sourced with links to existing established Wikipedia articles and external sources as well.  So, really, why is this article up for deletion?  What policy of Wikipedia does it violate or what principal of  applies here?  If that can be firmly stated, then I will fully endorse deletion; but right now, I don't see a valid reason for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELETION||WP:DELETE)

Comment: What we have here is a list of living people that are only notable for who their parents (or uncles, or whatever) were, in an extremely negative sense, violating  and  at the same time, and without even sourcing most of the comments made about non-notable people with unfortunate ancestors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:BLP)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a genealogy directory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: People saying a category would be better need to read . Seig Heil
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)