Deletion of Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature

Comment: Per the nominator, . As of now, it fails . There's no evidence that it's influential in its subject area, and it's too new to be "frequently cited" or be historic in any sense. Deleting it now doesn't mean that an article about the journal can't be created later; if it eventually is listed in major indices and databases and/or comes to be frequently cited, it will probably meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:JOURNALCRIT||WP:JOURNAL)

Comment: A new journal isn't going to be notable enough, fails  and . Wait until when/if |reliable sources start mentioning the journal, then maybe write an article about it. Also, {{ping|Rupp9772}}, "I am just trying to give it additional exposure" is not a reason to keep the article, in fact it's actually a reason to delete it, as |Wikipedia is not a place to advertise/promote yourself or your products/books/journals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NJOURNAL||WP:RS||WP:NOTADVERTISING)