Deletion of Janice Brabaw

Comment: Non notable person, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: for not |establishing |notability. The |sources can't really be classified as reliable or substantial and the |tone just smacks of the meddling of a PR firm. The militant |SPAs above only exacerbate things, too. In the end, I'm afraid that one (and a half) self-published books, a screenplay that seems to have stalled and credits as an assistant accountant (amongst other things) on a handful of reality shows |do not add up to a WP article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:SPA||WP:BLP)

Comment: Obvious |SPA attempts here in this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: Let's cut the hyperbole and personal feelings about what is an "important" person. Wikipedia already has quite clear guidelines about what makes a person "notable enough to merit having a page here":  describe the level of notability/accomplishment and  describes the types of sources we need to support those claims of notability. If the books are groundbreaking or very important in their field, then it should be no problem to find reviews in major mainstream publications or in scholarly journals in that field
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)