Deletion of AdBrite

Comment: nbsp; http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=13668424 Here is the coverage from Bloomberg Businessweek.&nbsp; "Routine" coverage is the kind of coverage that Obama gets, and means that a topic passes WP:GNG, and is one that we want to cover on Wikipedia.&nbsp;  is an issue for WP:NOT events, and AdBrite is not an event.&nbsp; Next, Wikipedia may or may not cover "significant topics", we cover topics that get sufficiently significant attention from the world at large&ndash;as per WP:N, "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below."&nbsp; Next, arguing that a topic is "one of numerous" appears to be an argumentum ad populum|argumentum ad numerum fallacy, because it not specific about the coverage for ''this'' topic.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: spaced ndash}} Passes  and  per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)