Deletion of Ekahau Site Survey

Comment: Strong lack of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I am seeing a notable company. There are https://www.google.com/search?q=Ekahau+Site+Survey&sxsrf=ACYBGNQgp8woXdTADSSn5MGrcQOPAiFP1w:1581088636451&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjPw6KU3r_nAhWZQc0KHUEYBHoQ_AUoBHoECA8QBg&biw=1497&bih=1225 many press releases as one would expect. The nominator states: {{tq|Page reads like a commercial brochure}}, but I think that promotional language can be cleaned up 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: I spot-checked a few of the sources; they're mostly routine coverage / product reviews in niche industry magazines, so fails .  The article itself has  https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=942640256&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 substantial copyright violations; clearing them would essentially require 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:TNT)

Comment: I agree with the !delete comments above, no independent secondary sources to convince me of notability. The article itself is a mess as well, lots of the (primary) sources aren’t even about this particular product but are  for other products by the same company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)