Deletion of Martin J. Walker

Comment: I !voted at the Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 March 12|deletion review to allow recreation provided it was based on reliable sources; my fear was that it would becone a . My fear has been realized. I'm not entirely sure which of the following two scenarios is at play: either a) there are insufficient ''independent, reliable'' sources to write a neutral, encyclopedic article about the guy, or b) a short, neutral article must be carved out of the lengthy coatrack which the article has become. I favor deletion; I am not encouraged by the reference to the OneClick website, which is BLP-inappropriate. If kept, the article should probably be stubbed and rewritten from the bottom up, with sources and content vetted for reliability and POV before being included
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)