Deletion of Barzilai paradox

Comment: One independent GScholar ref does not establish notability and also the title appears to be a neologism (see ). I would encourage the nominator to drop the "nowhere simultaneously original and correct" claim as it is a potential distraction as RJC suggests
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: I see no citations of this work in the ISI World of Knowledge, nor does "Barzilai paradox" generate any WoS hits.  I think this means there's no scientific equivalent of "widespread coverage" of the topic in reliable secondary sources required by .  I see no strong evidence that anyone but Barzilai himself is working with this idea, therefore no evidence that it's notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)