Deletion of Toptal

Comment: Sorry guys: the cleanup has indeed been massive, but what's left behind in a  business with a very minor "controversy" attached to it. Still reads like a startup blurb
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: because this article meets notability requirements in  and has received  in multiple sources that are undisputedly significant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: There's a whole lot of PR in the article, for sure. But there's a number of articles that I believe meet the criteria. https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/07/the-biggest-startup-no-one-talks-about/ This TechCrunch article by the editor-at-large does not use extensive quotes from Toptal and therefore meets the criteria in . Also the http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-19/why-an-ex-google-coder-makes-twice-as-much-freelancing Bloomberg story appears to be independent and does not rely on quotes from Toptal.  I took a quick look through the other references and IMHO the rest of the references fail as either being primary sources or they are not independent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)