Deletion of Black Jackson

Comment: The sources already included in the article indicate that  is met. Oh, and AFD is not the place to discuss the criteria set at . Thanks '''sparkl
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: While undoubtedly reliable, the BBC/The Guardian|Guardian are huge websites, it's not particularly notable to have an article on one of those sites. Surely the comparator is  point 12, a 1/2 hour or longer broadcast. The coverage this band has recieved is not the equivalent of this. The band may well one day be notable - in fact, calling them 'the hottest downloads' might be evidence of this - but I don't think they are yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: I always check the nominator's contributions in these discussions, and I must say, I found that odd too. It's highly unusual for a new user's first major edit to be nomination of an article for deletion and only 10 20 minutes after joining WP. |Assuming good faith, perhaps Special:Contributions/DaveBury135|DaveBury135 has edited before as an IP
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)