Deletion of Poweresim

Comment: Chinese language source is independent, detailed at length, and about the subject software (but it is only one source, it is linked twice). From what I can tell, the source magazine is written for hobbyists, it is not an industry trade rag. The other sources show it being used, multiple times, in industry demonstrations and papers. English speaking sources also show it being used academically at Chinese universities. I don't think the industry conferences and academic use show notability - however, based on them I think their are ''Chinese language sources'' we are missing. The user spent quite some time with the article in userspace before submitting it and attempted to address concerns over a month long period. |I think they've done their duty even if they are an SPA
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: non-notable and from |SPA with possible |COI
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:COI)

Comment: From the references listed in the article: ''Leakage Inductance Calculation...'' establishes some notability: not enough to carry the article on its own, but I can't evaluate the Chinese-language cites.  Ergo I |AGF, and assume that there is sufficient coverage in academic literature.  I also don't find flamboyant |peacockage or other indicators of |COI in the article.  Certainly the article could use a clean-up, but it is by no means worthy of deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:PEACOCK||WP:COI)