Deletion of Christopher Bollyn

Comment: He passes , but a weirdo nonetheless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: changing my vote) - yikes, I don't know what happened. I probably had a bunch tabs open and got confused about which article corresponded to which AfD. This guy is nowhere close to touching . Yes, this makes me look dumb. Now I wonder if I voted to delete someone else in a different AfD without meaning to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: He meets |Verifiability, but regarding , he satisfies the following criterion: '''1)''' The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field, '''2)''' Widely recognized entertainment personalities and opinion makers, '''3)''' Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work, '''4)''' A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following (though this applies explicitly to television personalities, I would consider it applicable given the circumstances, '''5)''' Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events, '''6)'''The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person. (Multiple similar stories describing a single day's news event only count as one coverage.). 6 criterion satisfied by my count isn't half-bad. Since most people barely pull one satisfactorily.  Just because you nor I agree with him, support his claims, or want to see his views disseminated, such dislike does not make grounds for non-notability or exclusion when he satisfies an objective criterion. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: the Pipes comments do not rise above the trivial (it's just another excuse for Pipes to write about his favourite subject, Daniel Pipes) and none of the other "sources" come close to being reliable (neither is Pipes in my view, but some may disagree). Not verifiable, no independent reporting worthy of the name, so in addition to failing the  hurdles, it cannot meet two of the three  requirements and should be stubbed if it is somehow kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP)

Comment: Legitimate? American Free Press was founded by Willis Carto. A notorious neo-nazi and holocaust denier. Can you explain why you think he passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)