Deletion of Mark Prindle (2nd nomination)

Comment: based on lack of evidence for . Only one reference in the article itself covers the subject of the AfD (Mark Prindle).  It is http://www.dialogi.lv/article.php?id=1583&t=4&rub=0 an interview on a Latvian web site. As I don't know the language I have no way of evaluating this site's nor the interviewer's reputation for fact checking. Four  words in the lead paragraph is not reassuring. I then checked my local library's http://ccclib.org/researchcenter/ research database and got zero hits. Google Scholar, Books, and News (using the links at the top of this AFD) only dig up trivial references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PEACOCK)

Comment: Mark Prindle has had several notable outlets, and in addition to the published materials has been discussed on and appeared on TV. I don't see any part of otability that says sources must be in print form for the subject to count as notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)