Deletion of Robert D. Arnott

Comment: although there is a concern about sources, it does seems like he breaks the threshold of notability in . There are a number of Ghits that mention him and 370 unique hits while low is not off-the-radar either. In fact I get http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Robert+D.+Arnott%22+investing&hl=en&lr=&start=450&sa=N 446 unique hits for "Robert D. Arnott" + investing. To me a link like http://www.allianzinvestors.com/commentary/mkt_managerQA07182006.jsp this one is at least weak evidence that he is a respected analyst. I think the article could be kept minus the self-serving fluff content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I'm not convinced that person is sufficiently notable, but am still undecided. He may pass . However, he is certainly not "a personality associated with Wall Street". I think one needs to have some media coverage associated with one's personality for that. If article is kept, it needs trimming and humbling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)