Deletion of Laurent Ziliani

Comment: simply because he meets : "Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition", as co-composing the soundtrack of Resident Evil 6, which is notable enough. A valid reference would be the end credits roll of that game. If you absolutely need a link, it can be found for instance in this video from minute 07:07 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW6mxMJD8-8
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPOSER)

Comment: In general, there is a lack of significant coverage to establish notability.  With respect to notability as a composer, he may be the composer of various music associated with RE6, but unless one can establish that as a notable composition, then criterion 1 is not met in  which seems to be the keep argument that is being pushed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPOSER)

Comment: Does not meet  -- no multiple reliable independent broad coverage sources on the subject. Écran Fantastique magazine article appears to be a suitable source for , however it is just one for now. All other sources given are primary or lack any depth of coverage (i.e credits). —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment:  is a subset of notability guidelines for composers and is not meant to supercede , but to supplement it. Several voters here, in particular the single purpose accounts, seem to be under the impression that simply passing  is enough to satisfy . In my opinion, the subject doesn't have significant coverage in reliable, independent sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COMPOSER||WP:N)

Comment: Now, if someone could show that he meets the , I'd probably revise my stance, but as it is right now, I'm not sure COMPOSER was meant to be applied in situations like this.  seems more applicable to notability when the music is the only, or main, area of focus. (Albums, Musicals, etc.) However, this is not the case with video games, where, unless we're talking about Guitar Hero or something, is not the major focus of the work. Again, if it can be shown that there's good plenty of |third party coverage in |reliable sources, then that would trump any delete argument, but if the only rationale to "Keep" is , then I'd say delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COMPOSER||WP:3PARTY||WP:RS||WP:COMPOSER)

Comment: Composing highly notable music makes a composer notable. If Ziliani's music is the subject of reviews and commentary in multiple reliable sources, that might make him notable. Composing music for a notable game does ''not'' make the composer notable. Not everyone who contributes to a notable work is notable. |Notability is not inherited. To give an extreme example, is an artist who laid the tiles for a small mural in the Kuala Lumpur Twin Towers, notable solely because of that work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)