Deletion of Satan's Angel

Comment: no valid argument for deletion. Smells of  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: subject clearly passes  as many |reliable sources included in the article indicate. I'm not sure why nom thinks this is unencyclopedic, but just in case, I'll point out that |Wikipedia is not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: Passes  and is well sourced with |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: I don't see any deletion rationale here beyond .  It's a valid biography.  I'm not sure what else is needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)