Deletion of Karl Schügerl

Comment: a CV and a wiki mirror are by definition unreliable, almost anyone can join the New York Academy of Science - I am a former member - and I see nothing else to prove he passes .  I can change my mind if convinced by |multiple reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:RS)

Comment: According to this biographical article about himhttp://www.clbme.bas.bg/old_ba/anniversary_7.pdf, he is a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and of the New York Academy of Sciences. I think that is enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:OR|Original research not |verified by |reliable sources. Possible candidate for speedy deletion as a non-notable person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: GS cites 89, 39, 28, 21, ... h index = 10. Borderline case for rof #1 on this basis but he did much of his work before the web existed and may not be well represented there. WoS data would be helpful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)