Deletion of Penny Smith (mathematician)

Comment: there are several reliable sources, all covering a single incident. That's not "independent" as outlined in . I wouldn't call it "substantial" either, since the sources are more concerned with maths in the computer age than with Penelope Smith, using her case only as a recent example
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There may be some amount of notability to the Navier Stokes claim but in the spirit of  I think that the level of notability required for an entry that's solely about an embarrassing incident in this person's history should be significantly higher than the notability required for more positive academic accomplishments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The "independence" criterion requires both, see : ''"Such sources must be reliable, independent of the subject and independent of each other."'' I wouldn't mind a merge and redirect to Clay Mathematics Institute, where the information on the Millennium Problems is kept, but she isn't independently notable. As an aside, is there a reason why the article's title is "Penny" instead of "Penelope"? Most sources, including her website (and even the article's first sentence) seem to use her full name
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)