Deletion of List of fictional gangs

Comment: Keep vote is garbage vote by known keepist, and should be ignored. Fails  and .  &raquo
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: WP:LISTCRUFT is a worthless essay.   is a proper guideline which tells us that 'the "category camp" should not delete or dismantle Wikipedia's lists'.   And of course, the topic passes  because entire books are written about this such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OVsmvcUa0GsC Youth Gangs in Literature
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:LISTN)

Comment: as complement to category per  and as index of articles per , and there are clearly enough entries with articles to merit a list regardless of whether editors decide that only notable entries should be included (not a concern for this AFD to resolve). The nomination is also contrary to  and , complaining of what the content is "for the most part" or of other fixable problems. We do not delete content because it includes flaws (even assuming that is a correct assertion here), nor do we delete lists just because they currently include entries that some editors think they should not (again, the non-notable entry issue need not be resolved here). We should not be nominating content for deletion if we are unwilling or unable to consider its potential
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:LISTPURP||WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Trivial and crufty.  and , sure, there are fictional gangs, but they're not necessarily notable. By the way, {{re|Zxcvbnm}},  says to "blow it up and start over", implying it is notable, but just poorly written. That's not what you mean, right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:ITEXISTS||WP:TNT)