Deletion of List of Silent Hill monsters

Comment: not enough coverage of reception and/or significance, violating #PLOT. Also, Wikipedia is not a . A concise summary of the enemies is suitable, but a comprehensive list of monsters is not. (Keeping in mind that , if only until they're nominated for AFD too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: WP:CFORK. While there is reception enough it is in relation to the game, and not the monsters themselves. The quotes above should be used to further expand the respective game's receptions. I see plenty of coverage, but nothing |significant -- just bit-and-pieces quotes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'm inclined to think "Silent Hill monsters" http://www.google.com/cse?cx=009782238053898643791%3A8naerdbd-oy&ie=UTF-8&q=%22silent+hill%22+monsters&sa=Search&siteurl=www.google.com%2Fcse%2Fhome%3Fcx%3D009782238053898643791%3A8naerdbd-oy could pass WP:GNG. But this is an unnecessary  right now and with the amount of sources could be easily covered in the respective articles. The minor mobs are not notable, only a few bosses are worth a mention (and Pyramid Head already has an article). There is little to no real-world impact. The article is practically useless to a general reader and is currently a list of trivia bordering OR. I'll echo Shooterwalker that OTHERCRAPEXISTS, in fact, ALOTOFOTHERCRAPEXISTS. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)