Deletion of Memorial Day Miracle

Comment: There are plenty of sources, as Zagalejo says, that use the term "Memorial Day Miracle." However, I still think the article covers a non-notable topic. Mention of it certainly belongs on relevant pages (such as Sean Elliott, San Antonio Spurs, 1999 NBA Playoffs, etc.) but the shot in itself is not notable. It received significant coverage as described in the notability ''guidelines'', but only because every NBA game is covered by mainstream media. There are no separate articles for John Havlicek's dramatic steal or buzzer-beaters by John Paxson and Robert Horry. I know this is the dreaded |what about X argument, but I think it's reasonable to assume that those events form a solid peer group. Articles in the category "National Basketball Association lore" (of which the MDM article is a part of) point to an individual player's page such as Gar Heard; why should this be different
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)

Comment: It's not on par with the Miracle on Ice, but it's an interesting moment in NBA history.  The NBA itself lists Sean Elliott's game as a http://www.nba.com/playoffs2005/elliott_050527.html legendary performance; in addition, the book 'http://www.amazon.com/Buzzer-Havlicek-Steals-Erving-Michael/dp/0385501455 At the Buzzer' devotes an entire section to Elliott's game-winning shot (which also appears on the cover of the book - see top image). As for the nom's claim that "there are no |reliable, |verifiable sources using the term," I found http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22memorial+day+miracle%22+%22sean+elliott%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8 91 Google News hits for "memorial day miracle" + "sean elliott"; the term also appears in the two sources I mentioned above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)