Deletion of Leo Ford

Comment: numerous reliable sources assert notability well past any GNG; like http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Leo+Ford%22+gay+porn+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a these, http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&q=%22Leo+Ford%22+porn+-inpublisher%3Aicon&btnG=Search+Books these and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Leo+Ford%22+porn&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 these, and http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&num=50&q=%22Leo+Ford%22+site%3Aavn.com&aq=f&oq=&aqi= these. This is - yet another - of noms unfortunate fixation in this subject area where their poor judgment including apparently ignoring efore is quite evident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)