Deletion of Niall McLaren

Comment: I might be new to wikipedia editing but right at the top of this page it says "All input is welcome, though valid arguments citing '''relevant guidelines''' will be given more weight than unsupported statements." As wikipedia policy states at  "If an academic/professor '''meets any one''' of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, '''they''' are notable." The reason I have made bold "they are notable" is because the poster above has stated that since McLaren's ideas are "adequately covered" he therefore doesn't deserve an article. However, reading the policy above explicitly states that if notability criteria are met '''the person''' deserves an article. Also, Johnfos recent delete vote does not address any of the arguments above. Johnfos '''"believes"''' he doesn't deserve an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Doesn't appear to meet  - no mentions of him in a Google books search other than in his own works, one article came up via Google scholar but I am not seeing any evidence he has had a significant impact in his field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)