Deletion of Jeffrey Hollender

Comment: A news search for Hollander shows nothing but press releases and self-written blogs; on this basis he is not notable. As for the company article, in my eyes it reads as |blatant advertising, but it seems notable based on http://spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.asp?ID=15185 and http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jun/22/4. The list of awards is a burden on the article; all companies receive awards, and though I have respect for this companies uniqueness, the wholeness of the article makes it spam—there is no balance in it; it is obviously written in by a profound supporter or insider of the company, and completely fails to fall into the category of encyclopedic articles. The detail of the list of products smells even worse. If someone should succeed at removing this profaneness I would of course change my vote as to the company, but right now it is very close to #G11|CDS#G11
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT||WP:CSD)