Deletion of Glen Weyl

Comment: without prejudice. It is clear that this person is a junior academic. It is also clear that none of his positions or accomplishments (undergrad awards, accelerated education, letter to Friedman, etc.) render him notable ''per se''. He does have research accomplishments, but they are extremely typical of a junior academic: 6 papers with a grand total of 5 citations and h-index=1 (WoS). Probably notable in the future, but art will have to wait until |then. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: He may well be on-track to pass  eventually but he doesn't seem to be there yet. The citation counts in Google scholar aren't enough to convince me of a pass of criterion #C1, the only hits in Google news that are about him rather than by him are a marriage announcement and a brief quote in a student newspaper story about a political convention, and there is similarly little in Google books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: That bio is pretty impressive, I'd go so far as to say notable. Does "Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows" qualify under  C3? Even if not under C3, I think he is notable enough to keep an article, which by the way is very well cited. Also, to argue , which is not valid, but I'm going to anyway, I would be surprised if he didn't meet notability criteria in the near future if you think he doesn't now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CRYSTAL)