Deletion of Tunego

Comment: Article fails to meet the criteria of a number of Wikipedia guidelines and policies.  and  are both left unmet due to a lack of in-depth, independent coverage. Note that the vast majority of the sources cited by the article are press releases ("Startup/IPO Tunego raises X amount of money" as a hypothetical) announcing funding, which is an issue as Tunego does not (per ) inherit notability from its investors nor artists using it, and press releases do not fulfill 's criteria for valid sources. Per the nominator's point, the article is also awash with churnalism and corporate spam, as could probably be expected given that it was created by a disclosed paid editor. Note also that the sources cited indicate that, as of May 2018 the company has raised around $13 million, which is a trival amount when compared to other companies; this raises  issues as the company does not denote why it is notable when compared to other similar companies, and  needs to be considered as the company is relatively small and still considered a newcomer to the industry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:MILL||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Unmitigated, paid-for spam.  A classic example of what the encyclopedia is not for. This company has done nothing to demonstrate significance or importance. The sources mainly just confirm its routine seed capital. and its entry into the market Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND)