Deletion of Brett Jon Salisbury

Comment: Just a comment that the non-stop promotion of this article from the |single purpose anonymous user--supposedly a kindly middle-aged couple--should be taken with a large grain of salt. Even the link above does nothing to provide a reliable source of Salisbury's modeling career. I would like to see the anon user move on from this single-minded focus, read up on |the five pillars of Wikipedia and work toward becoming a full-fledged Wikipedia contributor
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:FIVE)

Comment: i've been trying to find references, anything, to support this article for the better part of an hour. the only |sources to be found on the internet about this individual are regarding his college football career; and these do not necessarily imply |notability of the subject, only confirm that he played college football. the article itself is full of POV commentary about the subject, hardly any of which is supported by the given references. for instance, the section discussing the subjects modeling career claims he "was given the title, male super model in April 2002 by model-max.com", a http://www.google.ca/search?q=site%3Amodel-max.com+Brett+Salisbury&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a quick search reveals no supporting evidence. i am not syaing this claim is a lie, but it definetly isn't supported by the references. ultimately, the gist of this bio appears to be to build up the athletic character of the individual to lend credibility to the diet program. "the transform diet" has zero |reliable sources, http://www.forewordreviews.com/reviews/clarion/the-transform-diet/ this was the most reliably independent source i could find, it is a review by a website that only accepts submissions for review from independent publishers. in addition, this article was brought to my attention by the main
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:RS)

Comment: and somebody please re-write this thing!  I hate to break it to the naysayers, but this subject is obviously notable for the widespread coverage achieved from the book.  That said, in my opinion his participation and coverage from being an NCAA athlete would probably be enough to meet the |general notability guideline.  There is the manner of the style of the article--it's poorly written and is more of an advertisment than anything else.  If that is not promptly changed, then we'll need to delete it or blank it or something until it can be re-tooled to be an effective and appropriate article.  But the article itself needs to stay--the content just needs re-worked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)