Deletion of Superbrands

Comment: Meets  per a review of sources available online
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: I took a look at the article and I don't think the article is really salvageable. I agree that all sources outside of the article are not sufficient for  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Looks like this passes  to me. There are ''numerous'' sources that cover the organization in-depth and discuss the impact of major notable corporations and organizations that are recognized by the article subject (http://www.business-review.eu/featured/superbrands-romania-celebrates-10-years-of-evaluating-branding-culture-91374, http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/428452/superbrands-research-household-names-label-consumer-favourite, http://www.channelbiz.it/2015/05/28/superbrands-mette-zucchetti-tra-i-venti-brand-piu-influenti-ditalia/, http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/24/apple-consumer-superbrand_n_4846003.html, http://bimag.it/news-italia/superbrands-vince-disney-brillano-anche-bmw-e-nutella_316611/, http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/ahead-of-the-game-sonys-playstation-convinced-us-that-video-games-are-more-than-just-childs-play-8968089.html, http://www.albawaba.com/business/pr/focus-corporate-social-responsibility-helps-dulsco-become-superbrand-714872, http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/428314/cadbury-chocolate-top-brands, http://citifmonline.com/2015/03/04/british-airways-does-the-double-at-superbrands-awards/, http://www.worldfinance.com/infrastructure-investment/nmc-guides-the-way-for-the-uaes-healthcare-sector). Also mentioned in many books (https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WRL5qDi-KBMC&lpg=PA226&dq=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher%3Asuperbrands%20-inauthor%3Asuperbrands%20-wikipedia&pg=PA226#v=onepage&q&f=false, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DeSySvsLleoC&lpg=PA156&dq=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher%3Asuperbrands%20-inauthor%3Asuperbrands%20-wikipedia&pg=PA156#v=onepage&q=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher:superbrands%20-inauthor:superbrands%20-wikipedia&f=false, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=75VA3rU2sVQC&lpg=PT123&dq=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher%3Asuperbrands%20-inauthor%3Asuperbrands%20-wikipedia&pg=PT123#v=onepage&q=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher:superbrands%20-inauthor:superbrands%20-wikipedia&f=false, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=opTmCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA120&dq=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher%3Asuperbrands%20-inauthor%3Asuperbrands%20-wikipedia&pg=PA121#v=onepage&q=%22superbrands%20council%22%20-inpublisher:superbrands%20-inauthor:superbrands%20-wikipedia&f=false) that appear to be used in educational settings or give advice on building positive public relations. The recognition given by the article subject has significant coverage and looks to have cultural and corporate impact. Sure, I didn't find a ''large'' amount of sources that ''only'' cover the company in-depth, but I found enough evidence that, put together, looks to pass . The article may not be extensive or huge, but I believe that it passes and is notable enough for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)