Deletion of Avaya Enterprise Switch Manager

Comment: and '''|Salt''' This is straight spam at this point, in violation of too many policies to name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: There has been a number of editors creating Avaya related articles creating leading to a situation where the company is given |undue prominence in Wikipedia. IMHO, this is a case where  is a valid deletion argument - ther is no ''otherstuff'' about such a wide range of products from equivalent companies giving Avaya an undue commercial advantage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: per . The community has established a relatively high bar for articles about products, and this one clearly misses. There may be enough information about this particular product to rate a sentence in the Avaya article, but not enough coverage is warranted to make a merge worthwhile. This relatively simple product name is a plausible search term and should be redirected to Avaya after deletion. Incidentally, these articles have (so far at least) been judged individually, so "wholesale deletion" is not an accurate term. However, |bundling of deletions is absolutely permitted by process and would not, in itself, be a strong ''keep'' argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT||WP:BUNDLE)

Comment: Insufficient cited coverage to demonstrate notability, and given the  issues I'm not inclined to attempt rescue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)