Deletion of Sundown (C.O.P.S.)

Comment: No |reliable sources found or provided to establish |notability. Article is filled with |original research and plot violating |what Wikipedia is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:NOT)

Comment: Consists entirely of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as yet again |reliable sources establish |notability for this article that is consistent with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it.  The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  |Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.  Note, am now copying this to several AFD, which are the same, nominated by the same person, with the same invalid argument about mindlessly following the guidelines passed by deletionists campers as an excuse to get rid of things they personally don't like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)