Deletion of Ideal team

Comment: per Bagumba's nomination.  Fails the general notability guidelines per  (absence of substantial coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources) and the specific notability guidelines for lists, if in fact it is a "list," per  (absence of substantial coverage in multiple, indepdendent, reliable sources that address the ''subject as a group''.  I also have many of the same concerns regarding original research per  and synthesis per  that other editors have mentioned above.  Bottom line: the term "ideal team" apparently does not have widespread usage or meaning
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NLIST||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Appears to be , and could be because I'm North American, but I've never heard anyone use the term before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:OR  &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: seems to be  to me.  References are in another language, so hard to tell.  Assuming good faith, it's probably not a good fit for English Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)