Deletion of Cinhil Haldane

Comment: An element from a fictional series spanning a score of books and running for nearly 50 years. Even a cursory review of ISFDB listings would show a significant quantity of reviews and criticism of the series. There's even running, right now at tor.com, an extensive analysis of the series and its characters (more than a year of weekly installments, and not even half done!) by the notable writer/academic Judith Tarr, which itself cites commentary on the series by Ursula LeGuin. Since the nominator has admitted their practice of noncompliance with , their opinion should be given little or no weight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per  and OTPLOT; this is only plot summary and cites no third-party sources; notability is not inherited from the series; a merger is inappropriate because the merge target has the same problems and I am also nominating it for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: continued from above) We should be looking at the potential for the article, not its current content. To provide some direction for the AfD process, I suggest the nomination should propose how  applies (I think Andrew D is implying similar
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT)