Deletion of KOI-5806.01

Comment: WP:NOTCATALOGUE applies here. As others have mentioned, the threshold for notability under  could be considered confirmation as an exoplanet rather than just candidate status
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: leaning delete) In this AfD and similar others I see comments across the board to the effect that proven existence of a planet/moon/etc. is a prerequisite or at least a big plus to keep the article. Can someone explain why ( is not enough)?&nbsp;I mean, if there is  or  #3 coverage it does not matter if the object eventually is proven not to exist (the subject is notable, even though it is about a speculative topic), and if there is not then it does not matter either (since then it is not notable, at least yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL||WP:GNG||WP:NASTCRIT)