Deletion of Theda Nelson Clarke

Comment: per topic meeting  and bring in additional available sources to expand over time and through regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: per , per WP:GNG. bad article standard is irrelevant to notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: Poorly sourced article", |not grounds for deletion, "now deceased individual", also not grounds for deletion, however  may apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTN||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per , and hope that some editor is willing to weed out the many unreliable sources now in article and improve it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: per |DEL5. We don't keep POV forks, particularly about crime suspects who have not been formally charged. The article seems to be more about vilifying the subject than an objective perspective, with extremely bad sourcing I must add. In any case, this is a BIO1E and best covered in the incident article so as to not give undue weight. I personally do not think a merge should happen here as well, agnostic to a redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL5)

Comment: per . According to Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Crime victims and perpetrators|notability, "The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime... has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event." Given the documented involvement of the subject in the infamous and well-covered murder of Anna Mae Aquash, the subject warrants inclusion of their own page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)