Deletion of Movable cellular automaton

Comment: As I see it the most serious issue with the article is that it (at least the original version) seems to be about the author's own research. This brings up  issues and at the very least the article needs to be carefully reviewed to ensure that it is balanced and represents a variety of unrelated sources. My other concern was the lack of secondary sources; none are given in the article and I was unable to find any myself. The subject does seem to have applications in a variety of different areas so I don't think otability should be a reason for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:N)

Comment: but improve. Looking at the article, I see a sufficiently long reference list to meet |the general notability guideline. Without a compelling case that the article text is |synthesis, I don't see a reason to delete the article. I do agree that the article needs improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SYN)