Deletion of Blockstack (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nomination since subject fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Significant RS coverage ''of the company'' not found. What comes are is passing mentions and / or . Created by Special:Contributions/Guylepage3 with few other contributions outside this topic. With $4M in venture funding and per review of available sources, it's clearly  for an encyclopedia entry. Sources offered abobe do not meet  / , resulting in a promotional article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:TOOSOON||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Leaning weak keep, since there's enough above to satisfy , I think. But I don't know why an article about Blockstack must be only about the company and not about the technology such that in-depth sources on the latter should be disqualified. Do we already have an article on that somewhere? This article says it's about a "network," not just the business behind that network, no? &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)