Deletion of WebTrain

Comment: Regardless of whether the company is private or public, it seems to me that there is a complete dearth of real-world information about this corporation, and without it, it is impossible to tell if they have sold anything, employ anyone or has any physical existence per se. Although the company is listed as being active on 17th of June, 2008, it has not filed its annual return as at 20th of June 2008http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/cgi-bin/sc_mrksv/corpdir/dataOnline/corpns_re?company_select=3578682. This is the only real-world information know about its activities, other than it has a website, a registered office, and three directors. Together with the fact that none of the sources provide cited only promotional content about its products, this article fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: as the source cited in this article fail  and can at best be described as Wikipedia:V#Questionable_sources|Questionable sources. Overall this article is clearly a promotional piece, containing vague and unsupported statements such as "The WebTrain concept was developed in 1998 by Gary Campbell for the purpose of reducing training costs for off-site business clients". The article content and style fails . The article itself does not contain any real-world content about the company's turnover, or capitalisation, so there is no real-world evidence that the company or its products are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPAM)

Comment: based on the satisfactory introduction of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Lacks credible reviews in |reliable sources to show its importance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It is strange for an article about a company that sells things not to say how much it sold. The company's website is coy about turnover and capitalisation as well. It seems to me what is missing from this article (other than promotional spin about its products) is real-world content, context, critisism or analysis of the company's development and market growth. It seems to me this article, like most , puts the cart before the horse: there is an underlying presumption that the company has sold product, yet the article provides no evidence that it has sold so much as a sausage. What we have instead is an "Impact" section, which demonstrates certain organisations have used the product, but not actually bought it. Basically this article provides us with lots of promotional ''stuff'', but is short on real-world ''information''. A mention in a PC magazine is not evidence of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)