Deletion of Clovis library shooting

Comment: per , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per , all heinous crimes have local coverage of the proceedings of criminal trials about them and that type of coverage (such as on a http://www.krqe.com/news/trial-date-set-for-clovis-library-shooting-case/1009388522 New Mexico TV station) is  and doesn't automatically mean that GNG is met.  Beyond that, we have national coverage in the immediate aftermath of the shooting (http://people.com/crime/two-killed-four-injured-in-clovis-public-library-shooting/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/28/two-dead-four-injured-in-shooting-at-new-mexico-library/), and nothing else.  All murders are tragic, but not all are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:MILL)

Comment: it has been demonstrated that this has received both national and ongoing coverage.  Therefore  is inapplicable, and  is met.  This is a notable event for which a reader is likely to seek encyclopedic information.  The encyclopedia is thereby not improved by the removal of this entry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENTCRITERIA)

Comment: at the time of the first AfD being submitted, it was legitimate, but the coverage this received is certainly sufficient - multiple high quality sources at a national level. The key consideration is , point 1: the article is not likely to have "enduring historical significance" and quite possibly lacks "significant lasting effect" (though I would say it does meet ). However, point 2 is met - significant USA-wide coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:GNG)