Deletion of CryptoKitties

Comment: this is a very notable scam (/s 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Easily passes  by a longshot. Has Venturebeat https://venturebeat.com/2018/03/20/cryptokitties-blockchain-sensation-raises-12-million/, Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-04/cryptokitties-quickly-becomes-most-widely-used-ethereum-app, NPR https://www.npr.org/2018/09/07/645665479/what-you-need-to-know-about-cryptokitties-the-latest-cryptocurrency-fad, CNET https://www.cnet.com/news/cryptokitties-bought-a-digital-cat-for-172000/, NYT.com https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/style/cryptokitty-auction.html, Fortune http://fortune.com/2018/06/18/cryptokitties/, TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/21/why-the-next-cryptokitties-mania-wont-be-about-collectables/, San Francisco Chronicle https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/CryptoKitties-have-the-digital-currency-world-12462575.php, BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42237162, SSRN (academic) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3084411, about 5 more google books sources, etc. {{ping|Bkissin}} did you even bother to look at google news https://news.google.com/search?q=cryptokitties&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen or google books https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=cryptokitties before nominating this? Note rivia also has no bearing on , thus your nomination doesn't even state a valid reason for nomination (as there clearly are a lot of high quality  that features the article's subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:T||WP:GNG||WP:RS)