Deletion of Miranda Cheng

Comment: as article creator. I don't think this is a slam-dunk case by any means but I would not have created the article unless I were convinced that she passes . She has notable accomplishments (note for instance the existence of a separate article for umbral moonshine), well cited papers (three with over 100 cites each in Google scholar), and significant in-depth popular press (the ''Quanta'' article, not enough by itself for  because there's only one of it and the ''Scientific American'' one isn't in-depth enough about the subject, but also a significant indicator of notability). Also, may I add that (although I am ''not'' using this as an argument for keeping the article, nor am I accusing the nominator of conscious sexism) this is part of a disturbing pattern, where articles on borderline-notable female scientists are nominated for deletion at what seems to be a much greater likelihood than male ones
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)