Deletion of Reaver (Firefly) (2nd nomination)

Comment: the Slayage paper and ''Finding Serenity'' provided by Jclemens are enough to pass  as significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The independent sources provided by JClemens show that there's enough significant coverage to meet the . The coverage in the http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1105&context=honors honors thesis, http://slayageonline.com/essays/slayage25/Curry.htm Slayage paper, http://books.google.com/books?id=i_pfs_4vQooC&pg=PA193&dq=firefly+reaver&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NED1T-v8PIesrQHPhNHJAw&ved=0CFMQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=firefly%20reaver&f=false book, http://faculty.weber.edu/srogers/archive/FA09/2810-4810/4810.pdf syllabus, and (apparently) http://books.google.com/books?id=Z8dkAAAAMAAJ&q=firefly+reaver&dq=firefly+reaver&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NED1T-v8PIesrQHPhNHJAw&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBQ ''Finding Serenity'' are more than just throw-away mentions in plot summaries. The article's in-universe perspective and its need for expansion |are not good reasons for deletion. Wikipedia is in a state of becoming, so tag it with {{tl|in-universe}} and let's get on with it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: Let's face it, although ''Firefly'' was great, it ran for just ~ 14 eps and had the Reavers in maybe 3 episodes; none of its fictional elements (including Reavers) transcends the show, therefore I doubt this topic passes otability in itself. As for a spinout article, this article has ONE sentence on production that maybe salvageable for the movie article, but the rest is -UNIVERSE information, plot (OT#PLOT), and riginal research based on observation of the plot, so even with stubbification, there should be no stand-alone article per . &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IN||WP:NOT||WP:O||WP:AVOIDSPLIT)