Deletion of Peg Broadbent

Comment: while it's entirely fitting to acknowledge his untimely death, |Wikipedia is not the best place to do this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP: MEMORIAL)

Comment: or merge with Jefferies Group per  and . Lacks notability for individual article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or |alternate merge with Jefferies Group: per Nom, Dom Kaos, and Stevietheman. While I feel for anyone hit with the virus and struggle to avoid it at all cost, Wikipedia is |not a memorial. Also swung to delete per User:SWP13. The rationale that the subject is a "Wall Street executive" that doubled the size of his company, as evidence of notability, could be considered ludicrous. That would be the broadest criteria imaginable, allowing for thousands of otherwise non-notable corporate executives to qualify for articles. All it would take would be a couple of good quarters, possibly a couple of mentions in a trade magazine, and we would be inundated with |pseudo biographical stubs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:PSEUDO)

Comment: the bio is notable enough that it is covered by ''FT'', ''Forbes'', ''Bloomberg'', ''WSJ'', and ''Business Insider'' (all reputed publications in business). What else need to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Coverage external to his unfortunate passing is ordinary business reporting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL)