Deletion of List of Members of Congress who have represented Erie, Pennsylvania

Comment: the list has a well-defined scope with clear inclusion criteria relating to a notable subject (Congressional representatives). This list serves a very useful purpose. Congressional district numbers often have no continuity across redistricting, which occurs every 10 years and sometimes more. A state's "1st district" might represent one side of the state one decade and the other side of the state the next decade. Such districts have nothing in common except an arbitrary number. Lists organized by actual community represented is a very welcome addition to the encyclopedia. Furthermore, the rationales of the nominator and {{u|Johnpacklambert}} should be discarded by the closing admin, because they are based on , which is not a valid rationale for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSDE)

Comment: this fails  and , there is no reason to suggest that a list of congresspeople that happen to have had a minor city in their congressional districts is a notable topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: passes our criteria for  aides the readers in navigation and information, and that is what this encyclopedia is about.  Additionally the rationale for nominating is that we should not have this city represented because that other city does not have a list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: at the moment, appears to be  and possibly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: The nomination does not provide a reason to delete.  The argument about other cities is a form of  and does not explain why this is a problem.  Saying that this infomation is found elsewhere tends to justify the page per .  And there seems to be no consideration of |alternatives such as merger with the page about the city.  The issue which the page seems to be addressing is that congressional districts have been quite plastic and this is a way of providing some historical continuity.  Why is this a problem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE||WP:LISTN||WP:ATD)