Deletion of Timeline of psychology

Comment: There seems to be no rhyme or reason to this nomination as the nature of the article in question seems quite obvious.  Rather than being arbitrary, this presents significant developments in psychology in chronological order.  Other third-parties have done this too - see http://www.bps.org.uk/psychology-public/origins-timeline/origins-timeline the BPS' timeline for example.  The topic and its presentation are therefore notable and the rest is then a matter of ordinary editing per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: I concur with Warden that the history of psychology is highly notable and in particular timelines exist in the sources. I'll also note that this article is a perfectly fine list-based article, per #List articles, a timeline with almost all entries linked to one or more WP articles. A highly notable topic, sources to draw from and a well-formed article all point to unambiguously keeping this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)