Deletion of Holy Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church in America

Comment: Verifiable''' refers to citing third-party sources.  Without that, then Wikipedia:Verifiability is not satisfied, which it quite manifestly needs to be.  Otherwise, then it doesn't satisfy Wikipedia standards and probably qualifies as '''|original research''', which is also expressly against Wikipedia policy.  What you say here indicates that there is a clear POV you're trying to push, as well, which is also a problem.  Wikipedia is not the place to show the world what they've been missing.  It's the place to summarize '''other people's research''' into encyclopedic articles.  The reason why there's a rule against vanity articles (that is, articles created or edited by the people they're about) is to help ensure '''notability'''.  In this case, while there's clearly a set of webpages which your organization has set up about themselves and we have you here writing articles about your group, there's precious little evidence that any scholars or media have found your group notable enough to address in their own writing.  The article as it stands still doesn't address any of these problems, and given the nature of the group in question, I don't think it can.  Hit it big first, then let someone else write about the your group.  &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)