Deletion of List of churches in Venice

Comment: Since there are no citations on the page and there is no content of notable reference, this list clearly violates 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: In #Wikipedia is not a directory| it states: Wikipedia is not the yellow pages.  A listing of places (like churches in my opinion) in a city would qualify as this.  Despite this, the argumentst presented by all above have persuaded me to |ignore this, and change to keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IAR)

Comment: in accordance with  and :Wikipedia:Lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (:WP:CLS)

Comment: In addition to clearly violating #DIRhis, this is istcruft|listcruft and there are plenty of current precedents, including Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of churches in Fort Wayne, Indiana (2nd nomination)|List of churches in Fort Wayne, Indiana (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Malaysia|List of shopping malls in Malaysia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:L)

Comment: Even given that only |notable churches should have articles, and that non-notable churches should not be redlinked, this is nevertheless an obviously useful indexing page. Note also that Venice is full of churches that merit articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The list contains encyclopedic information that is not duplicated in the category. It is certainly not "an indiscriminate collection of information" as claimed by Freechild and it is not in breach of the #DIR policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)