Deletion of Arnold Gjergjaj (3rd nomination)

Comment: In the six weeks since this article was last deleted he has done nothing to enhance his notability (since his last fight was in 2015).  Some routine sports coverage about his upcoming fight with Haye is not enough to meet  and he doesn't meet .  My comment above deals with the keep arguments that have been made.  He doesn't seem any more notable now than in the previous two discussions (which were both in the past 6 months
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBOX)

Comment: the above mentioned comprehensive coverage in one or (maybe) two articles just doesn't meet , I'm sorry.  The guidelines call for 3-5 independent and reliable sources with comprehensive coverage of the subject - I just don't see it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The previous two comments contain spurious arguments.  Claiming he deserves a page because he's better than a fighter who has a page is both subjective and falls under .  Claiming he'll be highly ranked if he defeats Haye (who is not ranked in the top 10 by several organizations) is not necessarily true and also falls under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:CRYSTALBALL)