Deletion of Isaac Lichtenstein

Comment: Seems to fail . Has no |reliable sources for us to write an article about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: per nom.Fails  issues.Plus, even if he were verifiable (he's not) from reliable sources (they are not), which were neutral (definitely not), then he wouldn't be notable, anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Having someone of that name who existed is a far cry from anything useful about the man. Furthermore, the book mentioned isn't obviously a |reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: That isn't evidence of meeting 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: It appears he is not a hoax.Entering his name in the http://holliscatalog.harvard.edu Harvard library catalog turns up some of his books.He seems relatively unknown and may only borderline pass , except that he is apparently an important historic figure for the messianics so I see no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: A first and immediate problem is that this story is being presented as a biography of a person when there appears to be  evidence only of the existence of a belief by JfJ or some Messianics, independent corroboration of the story appearing to be lacking. There appears to be independent evidence of a person with the name, but not of the story about him as told. If this article was restructured as being about a belief, perhaps with a section on opinions on whether he was a real person, we could discuss |notability etc. under the appropriate category. But the article in its current incarnation presents him strictly as an historical person and vouches for his actual existence, so we have to review under . And there simply simply seems to be very little independent evidence of his existence identified so far, not enough to meet . If he were a figure in a Messianic religious text we could identify him as such and say things like "According to Messianic religious text...", just as we do with figures in the Bible and other religious texts. Wouldn't there be newspaper accounts, literature or letters by conventional Jews opposing him, some independent contemporaneous evidence of his existence and activities
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:BIO)