Deletion of Paradise Lost in popular culture

Comment: as per above list of comments.  The concept is good, but |there are zero cites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: nominator did not carefully think out reasons for deletion or present a good case for deletion. Plus it appears to be flirting with breaking  due to the sheer nature of AFD's of this nature listed all at once. Just because an article is dealing with popular culture does not mean it has to be deleted. If anything, the opposite is more likely to be true. Due to the nature of popular culture an article to do with it would tend to have more potential references in the popular culture than others would have
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Although I agree (as I should, having read the damn poem three times in three separate classes) that PL has "had a profound impact on writers, artists and illustrators, and, in the twentieth century, filmmakers," there are no reliable, third party sources to support this claim.  Many things draw inspiration from PL, but this list violates #INFO as a collection of indiscriminate information.  Any medium or pop culture reference to a quote or theme is fair game, making the article bloated and trivial.  Anything that is notable (and therefore able to be properly sourced), like inspiration used by Mary Shelley and William Blake, can be mentioned on their works' articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)