Deletion of Van Thanh Rudd

Comment: I'm always a bit hesistant about . First, it's an essay. But more importantly, it can be over-cited. Sure, many people wouldn't be notable but for a particular relationship. But arising out of the relationship, the person might have done things or received coverage that makes them notable in their own right. V Rudd is one of those cases. He's not a mere non-notable relative who has done nothing to warrant attention - he has actively sought and received it, through spades of coverage in reliable sources. All around the world. I think he well and truly passes  as a political activist ( being limited to professional politicians
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BIO||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I'm not Australian, but based on a review of the article and some of the cited sources, he seems to pass  based on his own activities.  Notability may not be inherited, but neither does being related to a notable person set a higher bar for your own notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)