Deletion of Manar Maged

Comment: The case appears medically significant and the article focuses on the medical aspects of the case, rather than the sensationalism.  Even though it was mentioned on Scopes, it does not appear to be the subject of an abusive internet meme.  Although WP should respect the privacy concerns of non-public persons (which I think is what the invocation of  above refers to), where the individuals involved do not appear to be concerned about keeping the subject of the story out of the public eye, privacy issues become less of a concern with respect to the information that the individuals are themselves making public.  If I had a child with a rare birth defect I doubt I would take the child on Oprah, but the parents made the choice to do so. There is no need for WP to be more concerned about the privacy of a subject than the subject herself (or in this case her parents) is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: applicable content already merged.  This is a case study, not a biography.  The article for the specific condition (''craniopagus parasiticus'') was poor, little more than a mounting platform for links to this article and the one below it on AFD.  I have |taken the liberty of redirecting that article to the broader parasitic twin (which was also dismal), rewriting the content, and referencing the material.  I see no compelling reason to delete as opposed to redirecting; these names are in case literature and media coverage, and BLP concerns (such as future impact on Google placement) are unfortunately not applicable in either case
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: There is a substantial amount of non-trivial third party coverage of this subject such that it meets and exceeds both  and  standards, and I say this as someone who spends a good portion of my time upholding such policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:BLP)