Deletion of Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination)

Comment: not conforming to  right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Weak delete'''. The book listed in the article is at at amazon.com  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1583671196/102-6651059-3616126?v=glance&n=283155 here, and appears to be of general interest, fulfilling the first criteria in examples listed on the  . She gets two hits through google scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Lila+Rajiva%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Search and returns 91 Unique google hits, which may seem like nothing, but is not bad for an academic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFTEST)

Comment: It seems to me that some arguments for deletion here would generally apply to stubs. The fact that an article is a stub in itself cannot be regarded as a criteroin for deletion. It should also be noted that NEITHER ,  NOR  are Wikipedia policy. __
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:PROFTEST||WP:BIO)