Deletion of Jesuit Foundation – Prison Ministry

Comment: We certainly do not agree on the excellent sources in the article. I stand by my statement and quoting of the sources, and the fact that the article shows notability and passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article subject has received significant coverage at numerous reliable sources  and therefore passes . Some of the sources cited include, here http://www.bangkokpost.com/print/432324, here http://www.hampshiredownswinchester.org/outreach-and-mission-ministry/covenant-with-the-poor/, and here http://directory.ucanews.com/news/reaching-out-to-families-of-laotian-prisoners-in-thailand/1584. The subject has certainly passed the threshold of notability  so the article should be retained at wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: Again we do not agree. Just because you may see something differently from another person does not mean the other person is wrong. I can say the same thing to you. You need to study , because that may help you to understand the policies better. Working collaboratively with other editors means to listen to the viewpoints of other editors, and take their words under consideration. Saying that the other person is wrong every time  because you simply disagree with their viewpoint is a poor argument that many administrators will see right through when evaluating AFD discussions. Good day
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)