Deletion of Moksha numerals

Comment: but '''merge''' into numeral system within , along with Chuvash numerals and similar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE)

Comment: Fails , specifically . All of the sources are foreign language, and no translations are available that I can find. I can only verify that http://www.rugbooks.com/catalog/product_view.php?prod_id=BOOKS005330I one of them exists which doesn't surprise me as they are all pretty dated, but does not help verifiability. Also, one of the claims made by this article is that a decimal numeral system was being used in the stone age, which would mean pre-dating roman numerals, etruscan numerals and attic numerals, despite it's similarity to them. If it was one of the earliest numerical systems then I would expect significant coverage in reliable sources. Google searches: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Moksha+Numerals%22&hl=en&safe=off&filter=0 web, http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=%22Moksha%20Numerals%22&hl=en&safe=off&filter=0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp books, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22Moksha%20Numerals%22&hl=en&safe=off&filter=0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps scholar, whilst not the best way to look for sources for ancient numeric systems, show nothing. Without sources that can be verified for such a significant claim the article fails  again, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NONENG||WP:V||WP:REDFLAG)