Deletion of Brett Leighton

Comment: strong notability, references included. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I ran a Google news search (results now included in article) and found articles on him in five different European newspapers in three different languages, one calling him (in Spanish) "one of the great specialists of the baroque repertoire". I think with that material added (and with the evaluative content in the concert announcements being sufficient to make them nontrivial) it's a clear pass for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I think he passes  although maybe not . The full professorship (could someone who knows german check this http://www.bruckneruni.at/index.asp?path=/de/professoren_und_dozenten/al_alphabetisch.asp&Key=4480&Typ=100&ListStart=0 here?) plus the work on the world's oldest organ and his role as top judge in major organ competitions passes the bar for me. Music profs are hard to judge as they don't typically write for journals indexed by google scholar, and their performance/composition work stays below the radar of the major media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Does not meet  nor .  Nothing stated in the article asserts notability, except the opening line "artist of some notability", a phrase that should be absolutely banned on Wikipedia.  Making CD's which do not chart, being a judge in a contest, working as a Professor who has not written notable works, all not notable.  As for the reasoning above that he is in a profession that does not normally get press coverage, so he must be notable... that is just whacky.  My neighbor's cat could be notable under such logic.  Delete to avoid setting a very bad precedent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:MUSIC)