Deletion of Wedogood

Comment: Press mentions at trusted independent sources" is not part of the criteria for establishing notability. Looking at the citations in the article, https://business.lesechos.fr/entrepreneurs/startup/021663880756-we-do-good-aide-les-start-up-avec-des-royalties-206860.php lesechos.fr is a promotional profile after the company "received the approval of the competitiveness cluster Finance Innovation" including a quote from the founder and fails  (no indications of independent analysis/opinion/etc). https://www.entrepreneursdavenir.com/actualites/wedogood-plus-que-du-financement-participatif/ This reference from entrepreneursdavenir.com is another profile piece and relies entirely on information provided by the company including quotations from the founder and is exactly the type of churnalism that  says is not to be considered for the purposes of establishing notability. http://www.startup-story.fr/entrepreneurs/crowdfunding-wedogood-des-royalties-pour-projets-a-impact-positif.html The reference from startup-story.fr is essentially a blog and fails . https://www.ouest-france.fr/economie/banques-finance/start-wedogood-prix-du-public-fintech-2016-4793558 The reference from ouest-france.ft is another profile piece based on the company winning an award and relies on information and quotations/interviews from company sources, fails . https://www.nantesmetropole.fr/actualite/l-actualite-thematique/la-start-up-we-do-good-recoit-le-prix-du-public-fintech-2016-economie-91461.kjsp The reference from nantesmetropole.fr is based on the same event and fails  for the same reasons. https://business.lesechos.fr/entrepreneurs/financer-sa-creation/etes-vous-pret-pour-le-royalty-crowdfunding-316451.php The next reference from lesechos.fr is entirely based on an interview with the founder describing their business and their processes, fails . Finally, https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2018/12/03/2917883-subventions-et-investisseur-pour-le-projet-de-dominque-renouf.html the reference from ladepeche.fr is a mere mention-in-passing and fails  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP||WP:RS||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I do not have the ability to do a thorough evaluation of the French sources, but on their face they appear to be general announcements and do not meet . Outside of those, there is nothing out there that could help establish 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: per nomination. Very weak sourcing, as aleady noted above, with a very strong aroma of |promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)