Deletion of Wikipedia Art controversy

Comment: per Iridescent. The |self-reference objections are noted and well-considered, but the range of coverage in various sources tips this over the notability line in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:SELF)

Comment: on the one hand, I was not far behind Werdna in moving forward to close the debate on the original article—had he waited, I'd have closed it. The original article was, frankly, a circus kept up by people forgetting that |we're not for things made up one day in light of the apparent intellectualism, and I still feel we're letting the artists troll us in their "intervention" piece. Sure, there was buzz generated, even from multiple reliable sources, but I still don't like it: they're using Wikipedia as a means of publicity, and that's something that we try not to allow. On the other hand, this particular article is probably notable, though we should not confuse notability of the ''events'' with notability of the ''project'' itself. While '''I do not oppose deletion''', I don't think that's the correct path in keeping with our principles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)