Deletion of PH-DVD (second nomination)

Comment: Believe it or not, it has http://www.google.com/search?q=%22PH-DVD%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a Google hits from outside of Wikipedia, so it's not a hoax (for once), but none of it helps the fact that it still fails . No Google News hits http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22PH-DVD%22 since October 2006, all of them blogs except for a sentence mention in a few British newspapers. But they're just the briefest of brief mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Could be a hoax, but either way, it's still far from meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per nom.  While I'm glad this isn't a hoax it still fails  and related guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: My original inkling in the original AfD was that this was a hoax, given the proximity to April Fools' day, and I still believe that to be true. There are still no reliable sources anywhere out there... the only sources cited in the previous AfD (i.e., the basis of the previous keep) were unreliable by Wikipedia standards... that is, bloggish news aggregation type sites (Engadget, etc.) that based their report solely on the press release put forth by the company. There do not appear to be any  based on investigative journalism by a news source... just rehashes of "Polarizonics says they're creating something called PH-DVD... here's what they say it is" and so on. (It's almost as if I were to put out a press release saying "I'm creating something" and having it picked up... don't give me any ideas! :P) One would think that something so "revolutionary" would have attracted more attention from the technology community. That assumes, however, that this is real. Sure, the company may exist, they may be working on something, etc., but Wikipedia is not a primary source of information, and there is nothing else of value out there (reliable sources, for one) on which to base a legitimate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)