Deletion of Vijay Devabhaktuni

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by  and fails to state a reason subject should be considered notable in lieu of sources under .  As an , subject might be found notable based on his scholarly work but http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=qYbMUeIAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao his profile indicates that his top paper has only received 301 citations.  (In general, a significant paper is one that received over 1000 citations.)  Perhaps it's simply  for this subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Nothing indicates that any criteria of  is met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: Citations are short, and fails this and other criteria for ; no noteworthy awards (other than internal teaching awards which are a dime a dozen), no prominent academic position or responsibility, and only full professor at a middling institution. Nothing to meet  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GEN)

Comment: Cites on GS are borderline for rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)