Deletion of Mel Krajden

Comment: fails  and . 4 gnews hits but only would count as a significant mention. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Mel+Krajden&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a. gscholar indicated participation in research but not enough to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: GS cites are 1590, 1126, 149.... h index = 27. Although this is a highly cited field rof#C1 is clearly satisfied. A time-wasting nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: He seems notable enough per ; some of his articles at Google Scholar have more than a thousand hits. The article is a stub and needs expansion, but that is not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: References which confirm his existence are not the same thing as references which confirm his |notability — he's not the ''subject'' of any of the references that have been added here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)