Deletion of JAMA Network Open

Comment: The nom has nailed it. . Does not meet NJOurnals or GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: So I spent some time searching around for anything about this new journal. The vast majority of sources mention this journal only in passing, along the lines of "such and such study was published in JAMA Network Open", or are of the "JAMA Network Open has been launched". The first type of source doesn't satisfy notability, it does not provide in depth coverage of the subject and the second type of source is the definition of  as mentioned by numerous editors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Journal is young but appears to meet  criteria through multiple media pickups of its content to date. Examples include NPR's Analysis Finds Geographic Overlap In Opioid Use And Trump Support In 2016 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/06/23/622692550/analysis-finds-geographic-overlap-in-opioid-use-and-trump-support-in-2016?ft=nprml&f= and Time's Opioids Are Now Responsible for 1 in 5 Deaths Among Young Adults http://time.com/5299363/opioids-young-adults-deaths/ (separate articles).  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: utter fail of /JOURNALS. This is way, waaayyyy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NJOURNALS||WP:TOOSOON)