Deletion of Sott

Comment: and break out the |snow shovel, as this seems to be a pretty clear cut case of an article about something made up one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: WP:MADEUP|Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, which this pretty clearly is.  Also lacks enough coverage to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per , was clearly made up one day at school and isn't the subject of any sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: Stupid kids engaging in stupid behavior, the epitome of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: The only source comes from the place where Sott was created. If I found a PDF file online from a college newspaper that talks about a child prodigy, does said prodigy deserve an article? No. The nutshell of  states that a notable article needs sources that are both independant and secondary, neither of which the Dixie Sun exhibit in relation to Sott
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)