Deletion of List of major artifacts in Dungeons & Dragons (2nd nomination)

Comment: Token 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: to Magic item (Dungeons & Dragons). Only a few of these have articles (or should!).  The entire point of embedded lists of subtopical things is to allow coverage in concise form and discourage the creation of pointless micro-stubs on non-notables. The entries are sourced, and they really are limited to major items in gameplay (counting all the modules and books, a list of all named artifacts would be at least 1,000 items long). This list is reasonable, it just doesn't belong as a stand-alone article, because the main article is short, and the topic "major artifacts in D&D" isn't notable in and of itself, though it is #IDISCRIMINATE|discriminate (encyclopedic), not trivia.  This seems comparable to other game/fiction stuff.  D&D basically doesn't consist of anything but a few kinds of named game elements: key characters and fictional races, magic items like these, and fictional spells and abilities (or fictionalized reductions of real-world abilities into gameplay elements), plus some fictional places.  That's not a tremendous amount of stuff, and our videogame coverage tends to be comparable; same with fiction franchises
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)