Deletion of Erich Feigl

Comment: This article passes . It seems to be a very encyclopedic article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: It seems that his notability rests on his status as a genocide denier and a monarchist crank, rather than anything in , and therefore that it should be determined by the existence of reliable secondary sources about him per . A http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=erich-feigl Google news search found a little, but not enough to really convince me, and the recently-added Spiegel article only mentions him trivially. At the very least, the lede of the article should highlight more prominently his non-mainstream views. I notice that unsourced claims in the article of being a historian and a professor at the University of Vienna have been the subject of some edit warring recently; the article still calls him a professor, but without context, and that should probably also be removed unless it can be sourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Above comment suggests possible bad faith on the part of the nominator.  POV is a reason for cleanup, not deletion; the de.wikipedia article is absolutely relevant, and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)