Deletion of Think and Grow Rich

Comment: Chronic repository of 'pseudoinformation' of doubtful (non- and/or ) origin (aggrevated by difficulty to police this due to lack of inline citations). No s indicating that it meets  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:COPYVIO||WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:BK)

Comment: we seem to have a large number of ''bare assertions'' of notability from editors who (with the sole exception of KleenupKrew) have not bothered to ''substantiate'' these assertions by actually coming up with s (the ''explicit'' basis of both  & ) for this article. If every editor who opined with such confidence that this topic is ''obviously'' notable would actually provide (in the article) a single inline-citation to an independent RS for a single fact, the notability of this article would be ''iron-clad
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:BK)