Deletion of Blue Hills Bank

Comment: Ran some searches, no indications of notability, fails GNG & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: No indications of notability, reference provided fails the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/03/12/blue-hills-bank-public/9Ojjltxh1TIRIsLUuxNgqJ/ The first link is broken with a 404 error. https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2011/09/22/hyde-park-savings-change-its-name/yS58i8sQl8dSbQ1hFiZPVI/story.html The second link is a company announcement in relation to a name change and fails  and/or . Your last reference is a self-published book and fails  as it is not intellectually independent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Thank you for fixing the first link. The article is based on a company announcement and this is confirmed at the start of the second paragraph. It therefore fails  and/or . You say that you disagree with my assertion that the second link fails  because the article predates the "official" announcement of the name change. https://www.bankerandtradesman.com/hyde-park-savings-bank-to-become-blue-hills-bank/ Here is another article for the same date. Note it clearly refers to "a statement" from the company as the originator of the information. Finally, your assertion that the last reference is "independent of the subject of the article, therefore it meets " may be true, but it misinterprets what I said. The book is self-published and books of this type are generally not acceptable as reliable sources, therefore it fails . Furthermore, the book is 96 pages and the company is mentioned once, in passing, and therefore fails . Finally, I stated that the book is not intellectually independent but this is no longer important to the process of analysing this source for the purpose of meeting the criteria for establishing notability since this book fails on two other counts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails , , and . First, the article subject exists but the sourcing is primarily concerned with Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc, and not with the actual Blue Hills Bank(s). Second, per  being traded on a stock exchange is not a direct indication of notability. Third, per  small community banks are not considered to be notable if they do not provide a notable service even if they have accrued coverage from reliable sources. My advice would be to delete this article and create one for Blue Hills Bancorp, Inc or rename and  the current article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:LISTED||WP:MILL||WP:TNT)