Deletion of List of papabili in the 2005 papal conclave

Comment: Nothing but rumors about who might have been elected pope.  In reality, no one other than the cardinals themselves know who was ''actually'' a legitimate candidate, making this problematic for .  Had some of this been referenced, I would say that some material could be merged into Papal conclave, 2005 as "people rumored in the media to have been papabili" but there's nothing worth keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: This list is completely unsourced speculation -- basically |crystal-ballery applied to the past. Papal conclave, 2005#Course of balloting mentions a few candidates who supposedly received votes at this conclave, citing published sources although there is no way to know how accurate those published sources' informants were. But that's about as much speculation as I'm willing to accept. Also, for some reason, the list has continued to be updated with cardinals who have died or turned 80 years old in the years ''following'' the 2005 conclave having their names displayed against a gray background -- although that would have been irrelevant in 2005. (If that were kept up, by 2025 every single cardinal on the list would have his name with a gray background
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: we don't keep poorly sourced "speculation" lists here on Wikipedia, this is a perfect violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)