Deletion of Yemane Niguse

Comment: Not enough in-depth coverage to pass , and doesn't pass .  The only sources which give any coverage about him are about his assassination, which would fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: The coverage for  needs to take into account |the demographic bias of en.Wikipedia editors and sources. We have a mainstream Ethiopian media source, ''Borkena'', that reports on Yemane and his leadership of a group opposed to the former dominating party in Ethiopia, the TPLF; this is not only about the assassination itself. We have a major Oromo people|Oromo media source, ''Kichuu'', reporting on Yemane being sufficiently independent that several groups disliked his leadership of part of the Tigrayan opposition. Both mainstream sources state that Yemane was killed for his political activities. The mainstream sources are currently reasonably widely used in en.Wikipedia for Ethiopia-related topics, showing that many editors consider these reliable, even though nobody has created the sources' Wikipedia articles yet; the red linking is reasonably associated with |the systematic demographic bias on en.Wikipedia.  is only about the question of whether the article on a noticeable person/event should be rather on the person or rather on the event; it's not an argument to delete the overall topic. Keep in mind that since early November 2020 the Tigray War with a near-total blockade on most forms of communication has been in place. This is not the UK.Wikipedia or the US.Wikipedia; this is an English language encyclopedia aimed to cover information about the whole world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIAS||WP:BIAS||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: One of these exceptionally difficult AfDs where it's nearly impossible to make a determination based on English sources and available non-English sources. Failing NPOL doesn't mean you can't otherwise be notable. Going only by the sources in the article, he probably does fail , but the sources aren't so bad that a neutral article can't be written about him. If there's anything else written on him, which wouldn't be in English, he's probably notable enough for an article. I don't find myself agreeing with the delete !voters, but can't defend a source-based keep !vote due to the difficulties in finding sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Cocnur with {{noping|Boud}}; claim that  applies is incorrect, Niguse's role prior to his assassination is notable, evidenced by reporting of the Fenkil Movement. It's also reasonable in this case to take account of the censorship restrictions in place and the difficulty in finding multiple sourcing to overwhelmingly satisfy the GNG.  Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)