Deletion of Intuition (rapper)

Comment: I found no significant coverage from independent and reliable sources with a https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=1642&bih=687&tbm=nws&q=%22Lee+Shaner%22+Intuition&oq=%22Lee+Shaner%22+Intuition&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3...9683.10858.0.11458.2.2.0.0.0.0.114.223.0j2.2.0...0.0.goOJbtZUNfI Google News search and only one article from a https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Lee+Shaner%22+Intuition&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=jSrqT76DGoeO8wSLlfn4Dw&ved=0CCsQpwUoBQ&biw=1642&bih=687 Google News Archive search.  The single article is used as a reference in the WP article and ''does'' represent independent and significant coverage from a reliable (but local) source.  The second source listed in the WP article is from an LA Weekly blog and in my opinion, ''does'' represent independent and significant coverage from a reliable  (but local) source.  Alone, these article don't satisfy , in my opinion.  The LA Weekly article mentions him publishing his second album under a label called Alpha Pup which is a notable label that http://www.alphapuprecords.com/artistpage.php?ArtistID=60 lists him as a signee.  As it's only his first album under a label at all he doesn't qualify for  point 5.  I can also find http://www.billboard.com/#/search/?Nty=1&Ntx=mode%2bmatchallpartial&Ntk=Keyword&Ns=FULL_DATE%7c1&Ne=125&N=128&Ntt=intuition no evidence of charting and no evidence of being on any major tours.  Ultimately, I think the subject of this article is about as close to being |notable on WIkipedia as you can be without actually being notable.  The only reason I !voted '''Weak delete''' is because, for me, it all hinges on those two sources being from local/regional sources and not nationally distributed news sources. In short, otJustYet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:N||WP:N)