Deletion of Merlin Trebuchet

Comment: per . More specifically, a  indicates a dearth of |persistent, |in-depth coverage: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=murlin+trebuchet&client=ms-android-samsung&source=android-browser&prmd=visn&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6-OGR__3TAhWEJMAKHYtuC8sQ_AUIDCgE&biw=360&bih=512&dpr=3 , https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=ms-android-samsung&biw=360&bih=259&tbm=nws&ei=9fYfWdKCCsrwgAbd_Z_ICg&q=%22merlin+trebuchet%22&oq=%22merlin+trebuchet%22&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.3..30i10k1.20779.24480.0.25566.2.2.0.0.0.0.181.291.0j2.2.0....0...1.1.64.mobile-gws-serp..0.2.288.l7xM-nsaywk . As for the 'A7 does not apply to this type of subject'; I assumed this to be some kind of joke. Is there some kind of inherent notability in lobbing pumpkins around with medieval siege engines?  On edit, I see what you are trying to say- that it doesn't apply to objects, only people, events, companies etc, which is true. But the point was expressed poorly enough to raise an eyebrow. I suggest greater precision in edit summaries, so the reasoning is in plain sight. Apologies for the confusion. Incidentally, a merge with / redirect to trebuchet is within the bounds of possibility I suppose: but it would need a helluva lot of coverage in reliable sources into the future. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:CB||WP: BEFORE||WP:PERSISTENT||WP:DEPTH)

Comment: per  - fails  by a mile. One |news source is not good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Lack experience with #a11 (adopted while I was away). Would it apply here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)