Deletion of MAGAkids incident

Comment: I am in Europe and almost every major European newspaper and television news networks have covered this as an event (e.g. not as part of something else, but as a moment in itself .... hence, don't merge).  If that is not , what is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While the article name could be up for discussion, a bright light is not needed to see that this is an event of the highest iconicity. One wonders how the nominator could in a case this rare even think of , let alone wanting the subject to get only some attention in an article on a subject to which it is only related by coincidence. This nomination does not convince me, on the contrary: I get the impression of someone wanting to silence a subject for no reason but personal unease
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: for now, decide if it needs its own article later.  Also, I've renamed it to 2019 Indigenous Peoples March Incident for now, since the previous name was chosen with no discussion, doesn't seem to appear in any sources, failed  (it appears to be a hashtag some people are trying to push, but not one that has gotten enough coverage to even be mentioned in mainstream sources, let alone reaching .  '''Strong delete''' for anything under the old title - that name refers to a non-notable hashtag, and we clearly lack the sources to write an article about the hashtag, nor is there any reason to think they'll ever exist
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: as Masem best described in their !vote above this event is still attracting a fair share of coverage and is still very much a current event, so it is simply too soon to say, although I must say that I think this article at the moment still passes the notability guidelines described in  and . As other !votes have stated above (if the article is kept) I would not be opposed to a future discussion to merge in a month or two time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: While  does state tabloid journalism isn't considered noteworthy, I will have to disagree with you that this incident will be treated as a fad and that this is not simply "tabloid journalism", though I do think caution should be exercised when editing this article.  None of us can conclusively claim this incident will have zero lasting impact when the media is still actively reporting on this.   clearly states these events " may be difficult or impossible to determine shortly after the event occurs, as editors cannot know whether an event will receive further coverage or not. That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable."  Unlike other Trump-related incidents, this one seems unique in the fallout that has occurred, especially in regards to the threats of bodily harm and even death directed at children by celebrities.  Neither do I believe this incident should simply be redirected to Indigenous Peoples March#Incident with MAGAkids.  At the very least, the incident should be considered a case study in sensationalism, but we should wait for the dust to settle before pushing to have this article deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)