Deletion of List of Brahmin Gotras

Comment: as complement to category per  and as navigational list of articles per . It ''should'' be obvious that "unsourced" is not a deletion argument; what matters is whether the information is verifiable, and the nominator implicitly concedes that it is. We also must consider the potential of an article per  and , not its current state, and the list obviously ''can'' be sourced, not to mention annotated and otherwise expanded. So let's not see any more wasteful and counterpolicy nominations like this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:CLN||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)