Deletion of Sacrifice of Thunder Child

Comment: well the nominator may not be sure why this should be deleted... but I am: as redundancy that contains an element of |originial research per ''"although the action is never given a name in Wells's own text"''.  Any information verifiable from the book about the actual battle could be merged by interested parties to the already existing HMS Thunderchild article.  It is a short enough article that it could easily hold the content of Sacrifice of Thunder Child (minus the title coined by the article originator of course
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: as |original research.  Yes, a plot synopsis created by reading a book is original research.  To not be original research, it needs to be based on some previously published reliable source's description of the book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)