Deletion of List of songs performed live by Nightwish

Comment: This article is clearly inspired by the Metallica list but per  that is not relevant for this particular debate. The Nightwish list does have some noteworthy pieces of trivia, such as the Sibelius covers, but those can be mentioned (with sources) at the band's main article. Otherwise I will have to back up all of the policies mentioned by the "delete" voters so far, particularly , , , and . I will add , because info does not qualify for an encyclopedia just because fans find it fascinating. That's what self-produced fan sites are for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOR||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: per  and . Lists of songs that bands have ''written'' are generally notable. However this is a list of songs ''performed live'' by the band (mostly their own songs plus covers) the number of times they have performed that song in their lifetime and a link to setlist.fm (a website where fans publish setlists of specific gigs. The slogan ''THE SETLIST WIKI'' - obvious original research). This is merely fan trivia and does not fit the purpose an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS||WP:NOR)

Comment: I'm not seeing anything resembling notability and only / arguments to keep. Where is the in depth coverage of "songs performed live by Nightwish" that treats the list as a group/as a notable subject in its own right? This isn't even a list of songs, it's a list of songs performed live (??). I cannot even see a list like this being included in the main article. In addition to notability, this seems like an  matter like a list of songs that have played on a radio station, a list of bands that have had cats on an album cover, a list of songs by Metallica using an electric guitar, etc. Just not seeing it, sorry. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:USEFUL||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: I don't recall any precedent for having articles like this. It's delving into fansite/unencyclopedic territory.  is a major issue - 's report on set lists here and there, but there's no way they consistently report on every single show - making proper maintenance of such a list impossible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)