Deletion of Differences between book and film versions of Eragon

Comment: I would like to point out to those voting to merge it that there is nothing in the entire article within the bounds of  to merge. You can't use the movie and book as sources because they do not state within themselves the differences between them. To figure the differences out for yourself is classic |original research. As an example of another article where this same scenario came into play, I'd like to point out The_Lord_of_the_Rings_film_trilogy#Reactions_to_changes_in_the_movie_trilogy_from_the_book|The Lord of the Rings film trilogy. There are many differences between the book and the movie, some quite as notable as any made between the Eragon book and movie. However, there is no unsourced list of said differences. Instead there is a section detailing the reaction to the changes, which mentions some of the more notable ones in the process. If there are no reliable sources decrying the differences between the two versions of Eragon or even mentioning them than there is no justification for this list's inclusion regardless of how much it could be pared or what article it could be merged into
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR)

Comment: or '''Merge''' The topic could be notable. Nevertheless, in its current state, most of the information appears to be OR and violated 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: unsourced |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: It's original research, as well as an #INDISCRIMINATE|indiscriminate list of trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: An indescriminate collection of information in violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)