Deletion of Debt-based monetary system (2nd nomination)

Comment: I skimmed the book cited in this article, and read the section that seems relevant (the article doesn't help here, as the citation is to a full section in the book, instead of a particular page). I come away with the belief that this article is, indeed,  , and even beyond that, it's a case of .  The book does suggest that coinage came about as a result of a debt/credit economy, but to link that idea to the naming and definition of a "monetary system" is further that the book goes (that I could find).  The final sentence in the first paragraph of the article, seems to be making a link (synth) that is not articulated in the source material.  I'm sure the "concept is not original" (per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SNTH)

Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 29
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: It appears this is a  take on the concept of a Money economy. I can't quite call it a POV fork, since that article doesn't exist, but http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/money%20economy Merriam Webster suggests that's the term for it. I'm not sure how fruitful it would be to possibly move this article there. Note that Criticism of fractional reserve banking says, "Critics of fractional reserve banking and the related fiat paper monetary system may use the term debt-based monetary system or credit-based monetary system to emphasize the role that credit plays in the current monetary system. These terms are not in general use..." This suggests  concerns for this topic. If it remains, it should be retooled to describe the phrase, as one used to criticize money economies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:N)