Deletion of Michael Mandiberg

Comment: Ample sources to meet  etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Clearly the article needs substantial cleanup, but notability is established by non-trivial coverage in ''Wired (magazine)|Wired'', a major national publication in the USA, plus approximately   http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Michael+Mandiberg%22 21 news articles (per Google News Archives) and  http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Michael+Mandiberg%22+artist 14 books (per Google Books).  Those sources are not used in the article yet, but they show that the article qualifies per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Although the article is in need of cleanup, that alone does not merit deletion. |Notability is present; by the |general notability guideline, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." I think that Wired (magazine)|Wired as well as the other sources listed in a Google search satisfies that criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)