Deletion of Emilio Neri

Comment: fails . The sources provided are mostly coverage of various subjects (in the form of acadmic reports) ''by'' the subject, not ''of'' the subject. Some of the sources don't mention the subject at all. The problem is that the subject has contributed to knowledge in a particular area but there is no 3rd-party to verify how significant that contribution has been. The significance of his contribution requires our own interpretation. We know Leonardo Da Vinci mad a significant contribution to art because many scholars after him have talked about his contribution to art. I can't find anything to |verify the claim that the subject has, ''"helped to shape policy both in the Province of Ontario and Canada"''. Even if that were so, is that really a significant enough contribution (plenty of academics contribute to the development of policy in their region/country) for the subject to be considered |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: The level of citation for his research (in a high-citation field) is not enough to pass #C1, and no other claim of significance is evident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)