Deletion of Tharik Hussain

Comment: One, "my notability" indicates a clear |conflict of interest and an |autobiography, both of which are ''strongly frowned upon here''. We are a ''private'' not-for-profit, |not a public webhost. Two, "very niche and still developing/emerging" screams "|not ready for prime time". Three, this is |a soapboxing: "clearly the revelations I have made..." Stop that. We are not a public forum. Finally, this is likely a |copyright violation: "I make that citation myself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:AUTO||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:TOOSOON||WP:SOAP||WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: I agree with the rationale of the nominator and the previous comment. The vast majority of the article is sourced to primary non-independent sources. The very few third party sources that exist do not make it clear why the subject is notable. The subject wouldn't pass  either. In the present form, the article is purely a case of  and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROMO)