Deletion of Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov (2nd nomination)

Comment: meets , and dare i say,  as an enduring part of the historical record (ie. national hero or example of postwar propaganda), that the articles on other WPs have been deleted are not a reason for deletion, in this case due to the generation of reports/discussions about this, it actually contributes to his wikinotableness
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: a lot of info. Appears to pass . But may require proper cleanup to suit wiki
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov is really notable person as a participant of Resistance. There is a lot of published reliable sources claiming that. There is several paragraphs about him in the book about participation of Azerbaijan in World War II of Garash Madatov, there is an article about Jabrayilov in Azerbaijan Soviet Encyclopedia. And nothing which can proof that he is hoax. Only |original research of some Wikipedia users. I visited https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:House-museum_of_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov house-museum of Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov in Shaki, had a discussion with the director of the museum, Javanshir Jabrayilov, who is the son of Ahmadiyya, made photos of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Awards_of_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov_in_House-museum_of_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov awards, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Documents_in_House-museum_of_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov documents, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Original_photos_from_France_in_House-museum_of_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov original photos from France and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Letters_in_House-museum_of_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov letters to him. Also Javanshir Jabrayilov gave me all scans of the documents and photographs of Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov. Yes, there are some unclear moments in the biography of Jabrayilov. But it doesn't mean that all biography of Jabrayilov is "Soviet-era hoax". It is normal that there are many unclear moments in the events of World War II. But during the discussion on Russian Wikipedia everybody confirmed that Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov '''really took part in Resistance'''. In 1970s he visited France, we https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3X5VZfF_c84 can see how really participants of Resistance (Rene Chambar, Louis Lasbareilles etc.) greet him. We can see how they visited memorial for Soviet victims. This visit was also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:French_newspaper_about_Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov.JPG documented in French "Sud Ouest" newspaper, where we can also see a photo of Jabrayilov. According to the article from this newspaper, maqui Jabrayilov was saved from a prison in Montauban while he was the prisoner of the Germans during the war. Later with the maquis of the region, he had to participate in the liberation of Montauban, Toulouse and Rodez. We cannot ignore these facts. We also cannot ignore the fact of the presence of French awards of Jabrayilov in his house-museum (Croix de Guerre, :w:fr:Croix des services militaires volontaires|Croix des services militaires volontaires, Insignia for the Military Wounded, Croix du combattant etc.). Médaille militaire we can see only in the historical photos, which Jabrayilov brought from Francehttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov_in_France_with_his_awards.jpghttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ahmadiyya_Jabrayilov_in_France_with_his_awards_2.JPG (as his son said to me this medal was taken from him in Moscow in 1966, when Jabrayilov was invited to greet Charles de Gaulle). French {{Interlanguage link|Caserne Bernadotte|fr|vertical-align=sup}} archive also officially :File:Feuillet nominatif de controle 02.jpg|confirmed Jabrayilov's participation in the Resistance movementhttp://www.m24.ru/articles/89737. In 2016 a plaque with the portrait of Jabrayilov was unveiled in front of the Mausoleum of Cabertat, close to Montaubanhttps://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2016/06/22/2370127-72e-anniversaire-du-maquis-de-cabertat.html. So, according to the rules of Wikipedia, Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov is really notable as a participant of Resistance to have an article about him in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:original research)

Comment: per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov|previous nomination, nothing has changed since then. The criticism is largely based on , particularly an e-mail correspondence with archives and related self-made conclusions. A reliable published secondary source analyzing the validity of claims is required to reach definite conclusions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: or '''Rename''' like :ru:Миф о Джебраилове as The myth of Jabrayilov per https://www.m24.ru/articles/VOV/13112015/89737 Not the hero: what is the use of debunking "de Gaulle's personal friend". Demand ''"if this discussion is closed as keep, I would like the hoax tag to be removed once and for all"'' is inadequate. See Warsaw concentration camp https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-the-fake-nazi-death-camp-wikipedia-s-longest-hoax-exposed-1.7942233 case - states (be it the USSR or Poland) have many resources to turn myths into documented "reality". However, you should not allow Wikipedia to be used for this. It is against . A lot of information in the article is given according to sources representing either Soviet or Azerbaijani propaganda. Information from Wikipedia articles diverges into a thousand places and then these places will be used to “confirm” the lies written on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:EXCEPTIONAL)