Deletion of Georgetown University Student Association (2nd nomination)

Comment: looks like it fails . Have had a look for additional sources - the same non-independent sources keep coming up. Surely links from Georgetown University and it's own student newspaper can't be considered "''reliable third party"'' sources for an article about that university's student association. There are a small number of additional articles from the Washington Post (some referenced and one or two others I found) but they don't really talk about the organisation in detail. They talk about individuals rather than the organisation. Could consider a '''Merge''' with Georgetown University. The same could probably be said for The Hoya - 6 of 8 "references" for "The Hoya" are articles from "The Hoya" - hardly independent third parties. The other two are from GU. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: because (1) |essenitally all large student governments at elite universities have been kept in the past, and such articles are almost always the targets of mergers of individual clubs; and (2) Bill Clinton started his polticial career as a freshman senator in this organization, thus making this a likely soucre of research in the future for our audience
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Meets , and per Bearian
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)