Deletion of Peter Crawley (headmaster)

Comment: High school principal is clearly not enough for any  criterion, and "Who's Who" is clearly not enough for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: My mother is in a Who's Who publication, and I regret to say that that doesn't make her notable. Seems to fail  as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Being in a "Who's Who" book, no matter of which country, does not contribute to satisfying  or .  Unfortunately, while the individual has written books, I still don't think this meets the notability standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BIO)

Comment: Being in "Who's Who" is not by itself satisfaction of  though the bio details provided by the honoree can be useful in writing an article if they are shown by other sourcing to be notable. The three newspaper articles are passing references and do not furnish significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Has an entry in ''Who's Who in Australia'', the inclusion criteria of which is "People are included if they have significantly contributed to Australian life on a national or international level." That by itself is enough to meet the |general notability guideline in my book. Also has a few mentions in major news sources: http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/hundreds-at-funeral-for-boating-victim/story-e6frfku0-1226039842345, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/sister-fights-for-life-after-speedboat-tragedy/story-e6frg6nf-1226034956095 and http://www.goldcoast.com.au/article/2011/05/11/313975_gossip-news.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)