Deletion of List of crooners (2nd nomination)

Comment: I think this meets the requirements for a list.  Crooner does have a specific definition, although it's a little subjective, since this isn't science and not the arts.  '''Merge''' if need be, in the spirit of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I don't see where this fails  or  or any other guidelines. The inclusion criteria can easily be settled on, I think; how about "This is a list of people who have been identified as crooners by multiple reliable sources."? These people have been covered ''as a group'' in a significant way in reliable sources, such as http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JXMHAQAAMAAJ&q=crooners&dq=crooners&hl=en&sa=X&ei=8RCJUI-tLKKZ0QXmsYHgAw&redir_esc=y this book, thus meeting the LISTN criteria. The fact that the list needs significant improvement is not a proper justification for its deletion. It's not harmful in the sense that it's not an advertisement, copyvio or has BLP issues, so should simply be kept and improved over time. See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTPURP||WP:RUBBISH)