Deletion of Steve's Ice Cream

Comment: The sources in the article clearly establish notability. Nom should probably familiarize with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)

Comment: can pass  with plenty of  coverage that says what they did. They are credited as innovators, especially for popularizing the mix-in. Mentions in http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,472860,00.html Time, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3190/is_n37_v23/ai_7942189 Nations Restaurant News (450 shops in 1989), Books (http://books.google.com/books?id=X4mhySvjqUAC&pg=PA457&lpg=PA457&dq=%22steve's+ice+cream%22&source=web&ots=20AHZsD5ok&sig=Hv5o8DmmCZUMjPWJYO-sZx3prKQ http://books.google.com/books?id=2o0k6hC8_RYC&pg=PA99&lpg=PA99&dq=%22steve's+ice+cream%22&source=web&ots=b6_EyOkSgG&sig=sGlPX78ibifBywWczLUcw0FCfV0#PPA100,M1). And that's only with a straight Google search on http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=%22Steve%27s+Ice+Cream%22&btnG=Google+Search "Steve's Ice Cream
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS)

Comment: Sources always trump aggregate search results, and especially so in the case of defunct or historical entities. Seems like we're getting to the |frozen wet stuff
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)