Deletion of Nguyễn Xuân Minh (Wikipedian)

Comment: to and mention in Vietnamese Wikipedia, per ''''''. He hasn't done anything notable outside of vi.wikipedia
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Vietnamese Wikipedia. Technically he possibly meets the letter of , but common sense would seem to suggest that what little content we have on him would be better covered in the wider article since it all relates to that. If he becomes notable for something else in the future we can split back out then
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: with Vietnamese Wikipedia. The subject appears to meet the letter of , with the debate largely falling as to whether the coverage is |reliable. However, in cases of borderline notability in which the subject of the article has voiced an opinion that they prefer not to have an article (as is the case here), that person's opinion should be taken into account. Call it , , or whatever you wish, but a brief mention in the Vietnamese Wikipedia article just seems to me to be the correct amount of coverage here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IAR||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: and perhaps '''Merge''' relevant content. While one could make the argument that he may meet the  by a hair, it seems to make more sense to redirect and work on the article about the Vietnamese Wikipedia for now. Particularly in light of the comments made by the subject of the article, who seems to be a very intelligent and reasonable person
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , not notable as an early Wikipedia editor for one of the hundreds of Wikipedias
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  with http://vnexpress.net/gl/xa-hoi/loi-song/2007/02/3b9f3560/ and http://vietbao.vn/Vi-tinh-Vien-thong/Wiki-Viet-ngu-giac-mo-pho-tu-lieu-khong-lo-cua-nguoi-Viet/30083276/217/. To a lesser extent, http://www.bayvut.com.au/nh%E1%BB%8Bp-s%E1%BB%91ng/phi%CC%81-sau-wikipedia-ti%C3%AA%CC%81ng-vi%E1%BB%87t-la%CC%80-ai this article also qualifies notability. Perhaps there are more reliable sources available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)