Deletion of Jacket matrix

Comment: per  since it is not notable enough for "a stand-alone article" (because there are not enough |independent reliable souces) and because "The jacket matrix is a generalization of the Hadamard matrix
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IS)

Comment: as per mistaken nomination.  Article ''obviously'' passes core policies  and .  It also ''easily'' passes guidelines  as "Jacket matrix" return 100 hits on Google Scholar. Peer reviewed sources are Wikipedia's gold standard, I refer nominee to  for details.  The ''delete endorser's'' COI accusations and reference to  (which merely is an essay!) are misconceived; the reference to  is ludicrous.  Yes, M.H.Lee (who in all likelihood is the article's creator) has published (and co-published!) buckets of articles on this specialist topic, it has NOTHING to do with , please re-read COI, and perhaps consult the essay .  Article currently only has one reference, simply because nominee recently deleted all the others http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jacket_matrix&diff=next&oldid=281508257, an action not justified or reasoned from criteria of relevance to the article, but from purely technical reasons, as the sources "were not specifically cited in the article.  I believe the nomination is in good faith, but nominee shows a limited grasp of Wikipedia's deletion policy.  Please close as speedy keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SOURCES||WP:N||WP:N||WP:IS||WP:OR||WP:COI||WP:SCOIC)