Deletion of M G Leonard (2nd nomination)

Comment: The book may be notable, but as of now the author isn't, IMO. |Wikipedia is not a means of promotion, but this article's main contributors are clearly |more interested in that rather than in Wikipedia's real purpose. If it's kept, I'll be pruning it severely. &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERT||WP:COI)

Comment: A cursory Google News search brings up lots of stuff. Most of it is about the book, but some of it is about her writing process (par example: https://www.theguardian.com/childrens-books-site/2015/nov/03/how-to-write-a-book-nanowrimo-national-novel-writing-month-top-tips-mg-leonard) or other things she's done (http://www.broadwayworld.com/uk-regional/article/ART-OF-MAKE-BELIEVE-STAGING-CHILDRENS-STORIES-Exhibition-on-View-at-the-National-Theatre-Gallery-20161222). The article definitely needs improvement though. Not sure it's a matter of , would counter that  may be a more appropriate way of thinking about it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NORUSH)

Comment: The book may be notable, but that doesn't make the author automatically notable as well. There needs to be material about the author themselves. I don't see enough to pass  here as well, so a redirect works fine
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)