Deletion of List of software license violations

Comment: I don't think anyone's on a crusade.  OTOH I think  is clearly irrelevant.  As everything is cited, so's  and .  There may, however, be problems with |self-published sources.  Libel doesn't apply to true statements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:SPS)

Comment: per  and . It appears that 100% of the references in this article are unusable as reliable sources for the facts they're citing – that the list entries violate the licenses of some other software. For example, consider http://busybox.net/shame.html this page on the BusyBox site. While that source would be OK for citing statements about BusyBox, such as "The BusyBox project maintained a list of projects which appeared to violate its license terms," it isn't OK for a statement like "Macsense HomePod appears to violate BusyBox's license." The article cites that page 17 times. If there are reliable, secondary sources which I missed, please point them out
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: see new vote below). Of cited policies the article fully passes , ibel and .  and  are clearly not applicable at all. Referenced list of real concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:L||WP:NOR||WP:BLP||WP:NPOV)