Deletion of NIKKO SUNSET

Comment: The "keep" votes above are probably the result of Wikipedia:Canvassing|canvassing, and are definitely guilty of the "|just notable" fallacy. Note the name of the person who created this version of the article, and the fact that the title is in all caps indicates an attempt to get around previous deletions. Now for the policy argument: the article seems to be using his "Region Media Award" as the claim for notability but that awards ceremony is apparently not of interest to the  mainstream media in that country, so I would argue that it's not a notable award. Otherwise,the DJ has a lot of works but media discussion about them can only be found in introductory form at unreliable blogs, and everything else is |routine industry notices and self-produced social media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: and |salt. Not notable. No significant coverage in reliable sources, and no appearances on |major record charts. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:CHARTS)

Comment: Fails to get close to . When editors above say ''"....It's notable and enough sources you can find about the subject. The actor is really notable itself."'' what exactly does that mean? "''Notable enough....."'' has no meaning. Looks like somebody got his friends round to try and make the case. '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)