Deletion of Ashkenazi intelligence (2nd)

Comment: One could easily find reason to fault the hypotheses the article discusses on many grounds. But the fact is they are |notable as |verified by standard Wikipedia criteria -- independent |reliable sources. The fact that there appears to be more  media sources like the New York Times referenced than scientific sources may suggest that their popular notability exceeds their scientific value, but this simply doesn't matter. Because Wikipedia:NOT#CENSORED, it doesn't matter how disagreeable or distasteful or wrong these views may be. Deletion discussions are strictly on |notability and |verifiability. Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: per DGG and Edison.  Totally un-P.C., but well-sourced.  I would encourage editors to insert an appropriate "criticism of" section per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)