Deletion of Makhdoom

Comment: No. Inclusion within  IS determined by the notability criteria i.e. inclusion in lists contained within articles should be determined by ource list, in which the entries must have the same importance to the subject as would be required for the entry to be included in the text of the article according to Wikipedia policies and guidelines and this topic "Makhdoom" violates otability because a topic is presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources that are Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable, intellectually independent of each other and "Makhdoom"  has none such sources because it is not notable enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:S||WP:N)

Comment: This one seems like a no brainer: it's a common title among South Asian Muslims that is carried down through descent or nobility lines. The top half of the article is poorly written and in dire need of sourcing, but regardless it most certainly passed . We keep articles simply explaining the name of and then listing members of families like Stevenson as well as articles about loose bands of people sharing similar descent such as the Blackfoot Confederacy. For the sake of consistency, a group of South Asians sharing common or similar descent and bearing the same title - which likely includes a higher number of people than both of the aforementioned two examples combined - is certainly notable. The article is just bad and needs a lot of work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)