Deletion of Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (4th nomination)

Comment: based strictly on the nominator's  and  grounds for deletion (listed in the 3rd nomination). I found five reliable-source books that mention the term. All are minor/trivial coverage of the topic (two are in fictional novels), but I think they invalidate the  basis for the third nomination, and validate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:ONEDAY||WP:OR||WP:ONEDAY)

Comment: The discussion has revealed no reliable sources which provide more than a passing mention of the topic. Without reliable sources, it fails  because there is nothing on which to base an article.The topic may of course be mentioned in any other articles, but there is no foundation for for a standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I asked the closer of the previous AFD to reopen it, after I had closed Talk:Baader-Meinhof phenomenon#RfC:_Page_name.It was clear from that RFC that editors were impeded from discussing the fate of the article by the lack of reliable sources.  However, the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (3rd nomination)|3rd AFD had been snow-closed by a non-admin only 16 hours after it opened, despite the lack of sources and despite the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baader-Meinhof phenomenon (2nd nomination)|2nd AFD having had much greater participation and led to the article's deletion for lack of sources.This is a perverse situation.  otability|Notability is not an abstract policy.  It reflects the fact that Wikipedia articles are based on reliable secondary sources, and without those sources a topic cannot be covered in accordance with agreed standards for verifiability.  I have no dogs in this race, other than a desire to avoid this perverse situation of editors being unable to manage an article because of a lack of the reliable sources necessary for its existence.I hope that this AFD will be allowed to run its full 7 days, so that editors can assess whether anything significant has changed since the second AFD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)