Deletion of JOSEKI (cipher)

Comment: mdash; First of all, I think that the NSA can take care of its own secrecy concerns and that we don't have to worry about them at AFD.  I have a feeling that if they wanted that article gone, it'd already be gone.  More to the point, the patents which mention this encryption scheme show that it's real (see http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=JOSEKI+encryption&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 this google scholar search).  Once we know that the thing is real, the sources in the article show that it meets the GNG.  We should assume good faith even though they're not accessible easily, since that's explicitly not required in  ("It is convenient, but by no means necessary, for the archived copy to be accessible via the Internet.")  Two of them are listed as "releasable."  Finally, it can't be all that secret, because http://books.google.com/books?id=06aPlTkdtAcC&pg=PT61&lpg=PT61&dq=joseki+encryption&source=bl&ots=9gXkYid7RU&sig=F-DKSfU0tIN_pEuRQQcUJVRDsq4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=4OcZULz1IuWciQK9qYHICA&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=joseki%20encryption&f=false here it is as one of the multiple choices in a study guide on network security and cryptography (not claiming this as a reliable source).&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)