Deletion of Mike Adriano

Comment: per  as well as the above arguments. Even the subject were shown to be notable, virtually all the text that could be retained consists of the subject's name, various forms of the verb "to be", and the occasional definite or indefinite article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Clearly meets the requirements of , which state, in part: "Has won a well-known and significant industry award, or has been nominated for such an award several times."  The article subject has won 3 AVN awards and has been nominated for 4 in total, as well as having been nominated for 2 XRCO awards.  Clear pass
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: I believe that  supercedes GNG here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: However, I am still of the opinion that it does not satisfy  - there isn't any mainstream coverage on him, only in porn-related areas. Per pornbio, the scene awards don't count for #1 however. Per Gene93k, if the article were kept, all of the fluff needs to go. I am keeping my nom right now. And to clear things up, {{user|Herzlicheboy}} is the article's creator. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I see more awards now. It now appears to satisfy at the very least, #1 of . &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)