Deletion of Flavoured paper

Comment: per #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|Wikipedia is not an Instruction Manual. No |verifiable |sources are cited either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: as |complete bollocks written about what tangentially could be a reasonable subject. It seems this is vandalism, as well, given the eloquent manner in which the case for the opposition is being argued
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not an instruction manual... or cookbook.  The tone is completely unencyclopedic and the article is in violation of  and .  Mokilik and Kelmool, please try to stay cool - if you could explain what makes this product notable or provide some sources, we might be more likely to allow the article to remain, but swearing at editors isn't going to help
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:V)