Deletion of 2004 Ingoldmells bus crash

Comment: I debated on whether or not to vote, but having reread WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT, I think this article's inclusion is warranted. WP:NOTNEWS focusses on breaking events and routine news, basically to stop Wikipedia being treated as another news outlet for stories that are here one day and gone the next. This event carried on for months (), was reported on by national news outlets (), resulted in safety changes in the area and is still sometimes referenced in the news (). The article could do with some cleanup and an update, but all combined, I don't think it fails WP:NOT at all. (And just to be picky, it was a bus crash involving pedestrians, not a car crash, and involved far more than 5 people - 5 was the number of deaths
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DEPTH||WP:LASTING)

Comment: Referring to  is disingenuous, since it is nothing of the sort defined in the policy subsections, so it passes it. Clearly meeting , multiple sources covering it along a reasonable period of time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:EVENT)

Comment: the article was initially nominated for PROD, which I reverted because it does meet  for both depth and duration of coverage. Per discussion with TonyBallioni on their talk page, if the consensus of this AfD is to delete then some amendment to  may be warranted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: I have reread  for more than I should, just to find how this article is ''indiscriminate collection'' but I can't figure out that. But I did find it passes  for being significantly reported about in |reliable sources; BBC, Telegraph, and Skegness Standard. Routine coverages arenot included in encyclopedia but this one is ''not'' routine due to certain defining facts associated with it: '''1'''- It was described as the deadliest Bus accident in the UK since after one which occurred in 1993 (this was documented by reliable sources), this clearly differentiates it from ''all other  Bus accidents in UK'' that occurred between 1993-2003, except if we are to assume no single accident occurred during these 20 years, which is outright implausible. '''2'''-.  It passes . Although it occurred in mid 2004 it continued receiving coverage up to end of 2005. And directly affected the behavior of large number of people (who were previously not connected to the accident) and this resulted in protests, and the protest itself received media coverage. '''3'''- It again well passes  because of ensuing litigation (which is not found in ''real routine and non notable accidents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:EFFECT||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: It was a notable and significant event. Notice, for example, that we have 2017 Washington train derailment highlighted on the main page currently even though only 3 people died in that transport accident.  NOTNEWS is clearly |NOTLAW
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLAW)