Deletion of Income statement

Comment: I satisfies   I'm sure that it can be sourced... I'm not even going to look as there will be millions of articles, news, blogs etc...etc...on this subject.  It just needs to be inproved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:NOR, ,  and  are not satisfactory reasons for deletion. 95% of articles on Wikipedia would be deleted if that were the case. I encourage the nominator to understand and read Wiki's deletion policies, which revolve mainly around 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I don't understand that makes this article so beyond redemption that it needs deleting. If the nominator feels the article needs sources, I'd encourage him to |be bold and fix it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BB)

Comment: Do a quick search and you'll find lots of sources.  Should have been tagged appropriately, not nominated for deletion.  I suggest nominator review deletion policy, specifically |DEL and |BEFORE
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE)