Deletion of Yosef Yitzchak Paltiel

Comment: per . The refs simply don't show '''significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject'''. Regarding the pages cited by Agricola44: I worked on the Chaim Rabinowitz page. The sources to books and newspapers are far better than these |primary references to Chabad sites and community news sites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: There is de-facto convention of which most of the panelists here may not be aware. Historically, there have been many articles on rabbis very similar to this one in the sense that they have sources that do not satisfy  (e.g. web pages, trivial mentions, etc) and have gone into AfD as a result. A great many of these have been kept either by consensus or by default by the efforts of editors seeking to have greater rabbinical presence on WP, several examples being Avraham Friedman, Tzvi Berkowitz, and Chaim Rabinowitz. Such articles have continued to exist for years on WP without further challenge. While I have advocated against the practice of keeping articles at this level because it basically amounts to special exemption from WP notability and sourcing guidelines, it might be important to consider this phenomenon relative to the article on Paltiel. Thoughts? Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)