Deletion of Reggie Arnold

Comment: coverage shows a pass of .  I agree it needs more development, but that's an ''editing'' issue and not a ''deletion'' issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  and , per Cbl62's sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: all of the source coverage above is from the state of Arkansas, which means he fails , and I'm extremely skeptical of calling amateur players notable who only received local coverage from their hometown, the region surrounding where they played in college, or routine coverage from the team they were drafted from, as local coverage does not necessarily imply notability. In this instance, though, it seems as if he was one of the best players ever to play at this particular program. My difficulty here is that I think best possible scenario is this gets kept and turned into an article which clearly demonstrates his notability, while the worst possible scenario is if this gets kept and it stays as this terrible stub, which ''barely'' satisfies the "sourced BLP requirement." I understand notability is a property of the subject and not the article, and I would say Jones is marginally notable, so a very weak keep from me, but please, someone develop this article a little bit and give this kid the credit he deserves
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCOLLATH)

Comment: fails  and . Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON)