Deletion of Peter Kinloch

Comment: I had my eye on this one when it was created a few days ago but held off, hoping it would get expanded/sourced. Not the case. Peter Kinloch is not the subject of any reliable, verifiable, independent secondary sources, nor does he meet any of the other criteria in . He does good work, but he doesn't belong (in article form) on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Primary sources — that is, those which are controlled by the subject or those with a direct connection to him — are not acceptable ''by themselves.'' Coverage from |reliable sources is also necessary. We can't just take your word for it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)