Deletion of Gaucho theory

Comment: based on so many things.  I choose |things made up in school one day, but there are s many more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per /
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WEB)

Comment: obviously. I will freely admit that had I stumbled across this it would have winged its way to #A7|A7-land already.'''''&nbsp;–&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: As nom, I'm already for delete obviously, but would you look at that, there's a policy for this sort of thing I didn't even know existed: 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Clearly does not satisfy  and also violates OT#NEWS, as a "theory" that is one day old
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: Hello. I am new to the format of the AfD debate, but I had the initial impression that a consensus had to be reached within the broader community of contributors, and not only within WP moderators. As mentionned, one might be surprised by the sudden rise in attention to the Gaucho theory; however, the nature of the missing step leading to Profit! has been explored for a decade now, and Gaucho theory came to provide an elegant solution for this question. The validity of the theory is still matter of debate, but the impact of its applications makes it more notable than a mere news report (if I understand the #NEWS policy correctly). The tidiness of WP seems to be at the core of the raised objections for users more familiar to WP. Now, we must arrive to a consensus so it would seem a reasonable compromise to include Gaucho theory in the discussion of ??? - Profit!. Special:Contributions/142.157.122.237|142.157.122.237
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: not notable, not covered by respected sources, |Wikipedia is not for things made up one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: this blatantly fails . The author can create this on some other site, perhaps one that devotes its pages to memes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I agree with Phiren. We should give it a month-long trial period and if it still fails  then, delete it. --Special:Contributions/24.16.61.196|24.16.61.196
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)