Deletion of Winross

Comment: I hear what Cstevencampbell is saying. Maybe this kind of situation - a small company which doesn't get WP|RS in the usual sense, but is of great interest to collectors and antiquarians - should fall under  and be considered notable enough to remain. There are tons of mentions about the collecting hobby in books, flea market ads, etc. If the company doesn't make it as notable, maybe a separate new article could be created about "Winross trucks (collecting hobby)" or "model truck collecting" or something like that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Start a website about Winross, but it doesn't meet , and most of the information that can be found about it will fail other parts of Wikipedia, such as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)