Deletion of Pandora (sculpture)

Comment: Drive-by nomination with no consideration of |alternatives to deletion.  The nomination's assertion about sources is false, as noted by Rorshacma.  And notice that the :fr:Pandora (Cortot)|French article is substantial and has plenty of sources.  All the topic needs is attention from an expert such as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: to Jean-Pierre Cortot.  I did find one source that seems to assert some notability to the sculpture, https://books.google.com/books?id=JW2DDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA106&dq=Pandora+Cortot+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjpzaeNr4ziAhXJwFQKHfjCBxQQ6AEINDAC#v=onepage&q=Pandora%20Cortot%20-wikipedia&f=false here, which makes the claim that the sculpture was one of the two pieces of art that first established the modern image of Pandora's Box.  However, that is the only source I could find that was anything more than just a mention of the sculpture's existence.  The single source, alone, is not enough to pass the , however I think it is enough that a merge to the artist's page, where the statue is already briefly discussed, is appropriate
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets  (and the non-existant sng , i envisage it to be similar to :)), article now has sources that reflect this, also in addition to any above sources that aren't in the article(?), there are books such as ''Les Beaux-Arts: illustration des arts et de la littérature'' (1843) in which the publisher L. Curmer describes it as "the most remarkable work of Cortot" https://books.google.com.au/books?id=1Kilb1hRZcoC&pg=PA618&lpg=PA618&dq=Mus%C3%A9e+des+beaux-arts+de+Lyon+cortot+pandora&source=bl&ots=XOeQQAc5of&sig=ACfU3U1l6ZoGexfmkfwtW4uZpMx8x7-lQg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiJuZr4rJHiAhXE7HMBHQnVCxcQ6AEwFnoECC4QAQ#v=onepage&q=Mus%C3%A9e%20des%20beaux-arts%20de%20Lyon%20cortot%20pandora&f=false see here (in French
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTNOTE||WP:NBOOK)