Deletion of Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia

Comment: I have started an initial framework, and added additional information from 10 different  sources. The article now has a chronological model, with subsections for years from 2006 through 2009. There is still quite a bit more to add, from an additional 100 sources or perhaps more
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Reaons:'' No valid rationale on behalf of proposer: 1. Neither  nor  apply. 2. Neither Scientology controversies or Scientology versus the Internet contain nearly the information given by article in question. 3. Alleged lack of notability not argued by proposer. 4. Specific notability given as a quick web search demonstrates. // '''Comment:''' Article should be renamed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NAVEL)

Comment: as there is plenty of |reliable sources to establish |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: due to Cirt's significant contributions to this article, it meets the |notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Definitely satisfies . Has received significant discussion and coverage in multiple |independent and reliable secondary sources. Examples including http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Church+of+Scientology%22+%22Wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Scientology%22+%22Wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS)