Deletion of List of re-education through labor camps in China

Comment: I immediately see a lot of formatting issue with the citations, but noting |that bad, as {{U|Buidhe}} noted above. No reasonable person could assert, with the |the significant coverage this issue has gotten, that it's not notable.  The major issue is whether it's a fork, or irrelevant as a list. That's a call on whether you like lists or prefer categories. I'm in favor of both, particularly when it would help our core readership, students. The remaining issues are not addressable at AfD, and a better forum would be the talk page or to temporarily block vandals
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: This is an informative, important and perfectly valid ists|list. Of course there are sources on this subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L)