Deletion of Arnold Hunter

Comment: comments in this discussion have shown multiple independent sources covering this individual's work.  "Subjects notable only for one event" does surely not apply since he has been a FIFA referee for a five-year period. Participants in international football matches are regularly kept at AfD discussions, and the referee is on the field with the 22+ players (including playing substitutes). Vandalism does not preclude notability. The nominator challenging every !vote they disagree with is rather poor form, as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: it would be helpful if there were some articles showing that he has received significant coverage sufficient to meet . Are there any feature articles in reliable sources that deal with him as a person
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: reliable independent sources online, just looking up "Arnold Hunter" reveals http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20160226_02150791 a http://www.demorgen.be/sport/jeurissen-niet-mals-voor-blunderref-kans-op-promotie-verkeken-b1b4cf43/ lot http://www.7sur7.be/7s7/fr/10816/Europa-League/article/detail/2629027/2016/02/26/L-arbitrage-desastreux-de-Hunter-fait-le-bonheur-du-web.dhtml of http://www.7sur7.be/7s7/fr/9099/Hors-jeu/article/detail/2629267/2016/02/26/Delire-persiste-et-signe-Le-match-etait-pourri.dhtml sources. By the way, we shouldn't be basing deletion off of what people use the page for, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LIKELYVIOLATION)

Comment: After looking closely at the article and the comments above, it is my opinion that this international referee passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: International referee, and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)