Deletion of Meditation for Spiritual Unfoldment

Comment: The substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources, as required by , is too thin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: no claim of notability in the article, questionable whether existing sources are enough to provide verifiability.  The first "reference" is from UKPRwire, and is just the group's promotional release, not a |reliable source.  The second "reference" is the group's own website, also not the kind of source that can establish notability.  That leaves the article with just two mentions in a single Cyprus newspaper.  Perhaps there are multiple featured coverage in reliable sources, but this article should be kept only if some are found and cited.  Before I get accused of hating and being at war, I'm not making any value judgment about the group or its practices; I meditate, especially to avoid getting upset with people who think that their most important function is getting their special interest covered in Wikipedia.  Such a priority leads people to suspect that the true goal is promotion, not spiritual improvement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)