Deletion of Yivsam Azgad

Comment: I did extensive searches. He got many hits in my university library, but in all of them he was merely acting as the mouthpiece of the Weizmann Institute of Science and none of the articles were about him. The Hebrew wikipedia article yields nothing better in terms of sourcing. Both are clearly self promotional. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The article reads like a CV, and combined with the image, looks highly suspect in terms of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: per . There is no evidence of notability through |independent coverage. The whole page is like a CV with |primary sources appended for every single thing he's done. Plenty of writers and academics produce large bodies of work, but Wikipedia demands that notability be proved through |non-primary sources speaking about the subject exclusively, or interviewing him, or discussing his accomplishments. The Hebrew Wikipedia article is no indicator of notability either, being as it is littered with |primary sources affirming every single thing he's done, and produced by the same editor as here. Please read : ''People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.'' That is not the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SECONDARY||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BASIC)

Comment: while at first glance the references look good, a deeper dive reveals a Hebrew Wikipedia article, random web pages |for places and organizations tangentially related to the subject, and self-edited websites. There's |no way to verify any of the information about the person. I have been to several World Cons, and won an award for most humorous costume at a regional SF con. He's unknown as a science fiction writer in North America. The page from OSU is a staff-written page; anybody who works in academia knows they're essentially self-published. If it were one of several sources, that would be fine, but as the only source, and in Hebrew, no
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:V)