Deletion of Audra Mari (2nd nomination)

Comment: as won a national competition not just a state one, coverage such as Philstar and Vanity Fair seems to be reliable sources and therefore passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The assumed notability here is hiding behind crap sources. Vanity Fair, Yahoo, 'Seventeen', TV zines and local press is all they amount to: Nothing to suggest 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: re above "general Wikipedia principals such as competitors in yourh competitions such as in sports are not as notable as competitors as adults.", i do not see this articulated at Wikipedia:Notability (people), Wikipedia:Notability (sports) or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, indeed  is almost word for word , which also does not preclude "youth competitions", if indeed this is the case why don't notability guidelines/policies even have footnotes to that affect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:GNG)

Comment: She has been in the court of 5 different competitions and has won four.  The fact that K.e.coffman cited  in ignorance of this fact should negate his ivote due to his inability to read.  More likely, as many who have been nominating and voting on articles about this subject, it is prejudice against the subject and uninformed, drive-by reflex in the voting. I also added a source for modeling, a CBS affiliate.  Vanity Faire and Seventeen are major distribution magazines and exactly the type of sources you would expect for this kind of subject.  While she is on the dean's list at North Dakota State, it is a bit much to expect to see her mentioned in the Harvard Review or NEJM.  I added the New York Daily News.  Plenty more where that came from so this clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG)