Deletion of ARS Public School

Comment: We keep high schools because experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found that meet . Google is a poor tool for finding sources on schools in the Indian sub-continent. Very few have much of an Internet presence. We need to avoid systemic bias and allow time for local hard-copy and local language sources to be investigated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Upon reading through the closure of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=767023947#RfC_on_secondary_school_notability the February RFCI have found that the closure is confusing and inconclusive, ''but'' from my understanding the result was 'no consensus, defaulting to status quo'. BTW, {{tq|Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist}} was the status quo back then; existence has to be verified by a reliable secondary source independent of the subject. I believe though, that the correct interpretation would of been reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Now though, school AfDs have become much further scrutinised because of the RfC, and I feel that is a slightly negative aspect. Now, here are the two sources that the RfC requires: http://www.odishanewsinsight.com/sports/mothers-public-school-bhubaneswar-champions-in-basketball-tournament/ https://www.telegraphindia.com/1160604/jsp/jharkhand/story_89196.jsp. '''This satisfies notability for third-world schools, as a contrast to rticles for deletion/Dawn School|this AfD.''' As a further note, |promotional language is a content issue and ought to be discussed at the article's talk page, not here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Per the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=767023947#RfC_on_secondary_school_notability RFC from February 2017 that states (among others) ''Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.'' Fails . Wikipedia is not a medium to promote a school
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The subject isn't notable. Arguments from Necrothesp and Kudpung ignoring the consensus signed by Tazerdadog, Primefac, The Wordsmith, and Someguy1221 are essentially  with a heavy dose of . I don't care about schools one way or the other just like I don't care about baseball leagues in Korea. I ''am'' concerned when admins decide that their preferences overrule community consensus. Either we agree to abide by consensus even when it doesn't go our way or we really just want anarchy if it lets us have our cake and eat it, too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDHT)