Deletion of Hawthorne, California dog shooting incident

Comment: I'll grant that the outrage exploded on this one beyond the usual mediums, but there's no evidence of |persistent coverage for the event because, as the nominator notes, this has only just recently occurred.   Furthermore, as {{user|HudsonBreeze}} points out, {{tq|We are not prophets to predict whether some incident has lasting notability.}}  Well put.  |So why is this article here if this is the case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per .  The only evidence we have of notability is that it ''is'' news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: and partial '''merge''' someplace per  of this well sourced and documented case of "''possible''" police over-reaction. Enough blame to go around. certainly.  Had the owner not drawn their attention by being vocal toward police about an event which did not concern him, or afterwards rolled his car windows up high enough, the dog would not have been able to jump out of the car to "protect" its master from a created "perception" of threat.  Only the future will tell if this incident has resounding implications.  If so, then the article can be recreated
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Completely ; if I opened the door or left the window open while under arrest to let my dog out I wouldn't be surprised if the police shot it, or '''me''', because that puts them under threat, and how would some random police officers know this guy was suing them? Also really tired of 'Anonymous got involved, so it's notable' articles being put up (and involving stupid things like not checking the White Pages before 'unleashing their forces' on some innocent artist supply store). Please HudsonBreeze, don't bother with throwing another random 'it's notable' link at me like you've done everyone else; I'm not changing my rationale without major sourcing and notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)