Deletion of Atomic dielectric resonance

Comment: I did find http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2008164/ one source that has been published in a peer reviewed medical journal, the http://www.biomedcentral.com/authors/indexing Journal of Translational Medicine. I found another paragraph size mention of the use of this technology in another published medical paper http://genomemedicine.com/content/1/6/63#B61 here (scroll down or use search term). However, I agree with Steve and the AfD nominator. Overall, this subject 's lack of noteriety means that the article does not merit inclusion in Wikipedia. This is because it does not meet notability criteria per . Also, I do not appreciate having to wade through all the sock puppetry on this page. Such behavior is highly unprofessional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As previously stated, fails notability ... no acknowledgment of its importance by |independent third-party reliable sources. On a technical level, there is nothing useful or comprehensible here, because there is no attempt to explain how it differs from spectroscopy, ground-penetrating radar, etc. (I mean explain the differences in how it works, not the differences in range or resolution or whatever
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)