Deletion of Classical liberalism (political parties)

Comment: Per  and . If you search using synonyms of classical liberalism such as lassiez faire, free markets, minarchism, you will find that there is backing for the platform of these parties. Classical liberalism is clearly defined and all the parties on this list are consistent with the subject (unlike the poorly written libertarian and conservative liberal lists). I think if (per consensus) we are going to build a encyclopedia that makes sense, we need to eliminate overlap between topics as much as possible. For a given topic, having one Master list (in this case liberalism) and then concisely defined branch lists (if the topic is broad enough, which this one definitely is: see Social liberalism for the differences), it would greatly improve the readability of topics.--&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:WORLDVIEW||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Too tendentious and so contrary to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)