Deletion of Multimodel Deep Learning

Comment: probably . Haven't found confirmation of Best Paper Award for the (small?) conference or even if they presented there, but maybe it wasn't by the primary author. Had reported best results for MNIST with their ensemble. Maybe if it was at one of big conferences it would have had more press
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Some of the concerns raised by the nom are valid. Some aren't. The Kowsari work has 56 references, inline citations are not necessarily required, but are present anyway. The other issues of not mentioning RMDL are somewhat a non-issue. The article doesn't claim them as supporting RMDL, they're in the history section. Other !voters don't need to dive into those references, it's fairly clear that this article only cites one source. The nom is right about failure of |GNG, and the whole article reeks of |OR. Kill it with fire adminium
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)