Deletion of Rachel Baker

Comment: as a . To elaborate further, this appears to have been a newsworthy story at the time, but nothing seems to indicate encyclopedic notability of this person or this crime, per se; the ''historic significance'' per  does not seem to be met. Without getting on a soapbox, this type of nursing home abuse and/or drug abuse by a healthcare professional happens quite often, unfortunately; hence the ''unusual'' aspect of  does not seem to be met either. While this type of story does get briefly sensationalized by the media,  seems to apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:PERP||WP:PERP||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: She's clearly notable as http://www.google.com/search?hl=pl&q=%22rachel+baker%22+death+care+home&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai= 2,800 articles on the internet show. Her crimes do not have to be "ingenious" as Bejnar assumes, just - as |notability criteria for criminals says - the "motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime should be unusual or has otherwise been considered noteworthy such that it is a well-documented historic event". The amount of media coverage shows it to be well-documented and noteworthy, and her reasons (a drug habit - strange for a nurse) seem to be unusual. This is not an ordinary criminal (e.g. a mugger) for whom the guidelines were probably written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE)