Deletion of Too Beautiful to Live

Comment: the article references coverage in |reliable sources which address the subject in detail as the primary subject of the article.  That meets the primary notability criterion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: While I was initially inclined to agree with you; technically a topic need only meet the  to have an article, other criteria are merely alternative not exclusive.  This topic has coverage from three reliable independent sources as demonstrated in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Evidently notable according to our |guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'm extremely appaled by the way you have gone about trying to go about this nomination, Notabilitypatrol, and many of your efforts in the past week on articles relating to KIRO. First on a previous nomination you launched a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unknown Puppetmaster/Archive|sockpuppet investigation against everyone who was against your opinion in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron & Don Show|Ron & Don Show AfD, including me when there absolutely no evidence at all there was no socking, including accusing me of socking based on '''one vote''' and voting only on merits. Then you have gone and made edits to the Luke Burbank article that are in a word, appaling and easily violate |BLP. Now you try to form a nomination against this show based on self-created criteria that basically say that if you're not in a Top 10 market, your show doesn't belong on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)