Deletion of Sharon Moalem

Comment: It is bogus to claim that coverage in the NY Times does not count for notability because the "just lazily copy press releases." They are a reputable newspaper whose editorial policy screens out non-notable press releases. See  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per JFW and Droliver.  Specifically, Moalem's record fails to meet either io or Wikipedia:Notability (academics).  Recommend related trimming of the bibliography section of Evolutionary medicine, where Moalem has been added and linked to ''three'' times and inserted second in line as one of "the most prominent scientists" in the field.  If Moalem's record matched that of the other "most prominent scientists" listed there, this would be an obvious keep.  Unfortunately, Moalem does not appear to meet our criteria for notability.  I'm trying to AGF, but it is difficult not to see this as promoting a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolutionary_medicine&diff=95046839&oldid=95046520 soon-to-be-released book by Sharon Moalem
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: the http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/17/health/17diab.html?ex=1273982400&en=13384fea64cac750&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss New York Times article mentioned by Evolu does mention this person and calls him an "expert" so he does appear to be quite notable, although I'm not entirely sure if that's enough to satisfy . Weak keep for now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)