Deletion of Archive.is (2nd nomination)

Comment: Quoting my argument from Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 June 1|the deletion review: The ''CNET Japan'' and ''Ferra.ru'' articles only seem to be providing basic descriptions of the service, which I don't think meets the "significant coverage" requirement of GNG; the ''PLOS ONE'' article only has incidental coverage anyway, and I can't access the ''IJoDL'' article, but based on OP's summary I'm assuming that is also only incidental coverage. That only leaves the ''Vice'' article as clearly providing significant coverage. Thus it doesn't meet |GNG and I don't see any other notability guideline that it does meet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this does seem to meet the minimum threshold of  with the current sources it has.  I think it might be a good idea to review again in 6 months per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the website is |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)