Deletion of Christian Polak

Comment: If he really is a '''''|notable''''' specialist, what information can be provided to substantiate this claim?  If sources can be found, keep; otherwise delete. -&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Ignore my comments in the long thread just below. There isn't enough sourcing to meet any of our notability requirements -- neither WP:N, WP:BIO nor . The closest criterion this might meet is  #1 (''regarded as a significant expert in his or her area by independent sources'') but Example #2 in that guideline requires that there be plenty of those sources, and we don't have that many, even though there's been plenty of searching for them. Thanks to Nsk92 for help with understanding 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The citations provided by Abd are valid but there are too few of them to indicate that Polak has made significant impact in his scholarly field. A GoogleScholar search for him turns up almost nothing. I disagree to a point with Jehochman's logic: in scholarly articles people do not generally write ''about'' somebody else's research. They write articles containing new original research where the work of others is mentioned and/or discussed in context. So a high citation rate and a high H-index would be substatial indicators of academic notability. But that is not what we seem to have here. The ''total'' number of citations (per GoogleBooks and GoogleScholar together) seems to be rather small (maybe two dozen in total). So while he may be an expert (as are most people who got a PhD in something), there is not enough evidence to conclude that he is a significant expert in his field who made a substantial impact on that field. This tells me that he fails  and I did not see arguments for other kinds of notability, per , offered here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)