Deletion of The Truth: Gujarat 2002 – Tehelka report

Comment: and merge to 2002 Gujarat Violence, per Dharmadhyaksha. It is the prime example of scandal-mongering which wikipedia tends to avoid. |Wikipedia is not a soap box. '''|Wikipedia is not a newspaper'''. The whole thing and it's validity is pivoted upon the claims of ''one'' man '''Ashish Khetan''' (who performed the '''sting''' operation). '''|Sensationalist claim  does get shared between news sources, and is often printed in hundreds of papers but that doesn't make them true, does it?''' Tehelka is a downright partisan source, if this gets its separate articles then I have dozens of articles in store. Some critics even argued that the inaccuracies of the claims detract from its validity as evidence(http://www.sify.com/itihaas/fullstory.php?id=14562098,http://archive.deccanherald.com/content/Oct272007/national2007102732570.asp, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?235985). The Supreme Court Special Investigation Team eventually ''did not'' admit the Tehelka recordings as evidence because of dubious and inaccurate claims.(source: Jaffrelot, Christophe (25 February 2012). "Gujarat 2002: What Justice for the Victims? The Supreme Court, the SIT, the Police and the State Judiciary". Economic & Political Weekly. xlvii (8): 77–89
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:109PAPERS)

Comment: essentially per . Good deal of secondary source coverage is demonstrated sufficiently. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)