Deletion of Paska Ankka

Comment: as a gross violation of  and a possible violation of WP:NOR. Find some |reliable sources for |verification and I will change my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: I've tried to source this, and it can't be sourced beyond primary sources, and I can't find enough information to even source this article.  I don't dispute that it may be real, but that's not the point of Wikipedia, '''I'm real'''.  |Verifiability policy demands "facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources".  I can't source these, so I prodded the article as a method of removing unverifiable material.  If someone can find a definitive verifiable source which contextualises this phrase in a manner in which an article can be written I'm happy to change my vote, but it isn't enough to say this stuff exists.  The whole basis of wikipedia is that the three key policies are non-negotiable.  Otherwise, can I please start adding information about my Sunday League Football team, they're real.  I can link to them.  Notability isn't the issue, it's being able to verify the statements made.  This article includes a summary of a statement from the Finnish Aku Ankka (Donald Duck) comic book.  If that can't be sourced it has to be removed since I can't quantify that it's not original research.  Nothing in this article can be quantified apart from the fact that some people on the internet use the term to describe what they are doing.  |Wikipedia is not a guide to the internet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT)