Deletion of List of Philippine Presidents by longevity (second nomination)

Comment: trivia pulled out of the articles and stuck into a pointless table. President-cruft, for lack of a better term. Useless information pretending to be ana rticle. And lest I be accused of bias, I think that all articles for leaders of any nation by longevity should be deleted without regard to the nation, its size, its importance on the world stage or anything else. Precedent is useful to look at but not 100% binding as Wikipedia is not a court of law and |consensus can change
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: Also, assessing the comments in those discussions, I think Xoloz's summary above would be more complete if it said "...rationales based on precedent, consistency and |bias
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: but only due to the fact that the similar article for US Presidents was kept.  For the record, I am of the opinion that this ''type'' of article is unencyclopedic and does not pass .  However, I have to argue for keeping this article for the sake of consistency, precedent and avoiding systemic bias in favor of US based articles.  None of these articles should exist, but as long as consensus is for keeping one of them, the rest should stay on principle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)