Deletion of Aysha Naushad Khan (2nd nomination)

Comment: 1)- is just a note, #2)- "K.R. Nayar, Senior Reporter" = Wikipedia:Trivial mentions|'''passing mention''' and is primarily about Dipanki Borcar, #3)- "Jai Prasad V. Rai, Sports Reporter": ''Bowled 'em over'', coverage is GN Media publishing news reporting, "Gulf News Cricket", subtitled ''She's only 12, but the talented bowler has already caught the eye of coaches'' and the coaches are "her coaches" so the source, that includes interviews and opinions of her couches, is laced with |positive advertising words, so has biased connotations over independent reporting, #4)- "Women's cricket could catch on in the UAE" = '''very passing mention''': "while ''Aysha Naushadkhan'', Petule Nadar & Humaira Tasneem chipped in with 1 wicket apiece.", #5)- CricNepal: Repeat of number 4, #6)- "UAE girls on song against Malaysia and Oman" = two instances of '''passing mention''': "while Aysha Naushadkhan grabbed one to provide the finishing touch to victory.", and "Aysha Naushadkhan 1-7", #7)- "Humaira to lead U-19 team": Two '''passing mentions''', "...and Aysha Naushadkhan (aged 13) is the youngest player in the squad." as well as a listing in the squad, "Aysha Naushadkhan", #8)- "NEPAL THRASHES UAE FOR CONSECUTIVE WIN": '''brief passing mention''', "Thapa was caught by Kyna Vedhasinghe off Aysha Naushadkhan in the fifth ball of the sixth over", #9)- "ACC U-19 Women’s Championship 2010 - Results", '''Missed any mention of subject''', #10)- Gulf News Cricket: "Sharjah honours top performers", Special awards include "Ayesha Naushad Khan" is '''passing mention''', #11)- Gulf News Cricket: "UAE women’s cricket team win GCC championship" with the subtitle; "Subha bags best batswoman and Samiya wins best bowler of the tournament awards", '''missed any mention of the subject''', #12)- dead link, #13)- "UAE women cricketers aim to strike hot at the GCC T20 tournament", '''missed any mention of subject''', #14)- "UAE women beat Qatar to retain GCC T20 title", ''after Heena Hotchandani and Ayesha Naushad Khan bowled exceptional spells.''. Same sentence mentioned twice and '''passing mention''', #15)- "UAE women's cricket team win Gulf Cup": ''...with Ayesh Naushad taking three wickets'' and ''Aysha Naushad (16)'' is '''Passing mention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFFERY)

Comment: Fails  : Only one of the referenced articles actually covers her in detail, the rest are passing mentions / routine coverage / stats listings. Fails  too by my reckoning
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCRIC)

Comment: I think she fails  but just passes . https://gulfnews.com/sport/cricket/bowled-em-over-1.971431 This article is entirely about her, and I think the three paragraphs about her in https://www.thenational.ae/sport/women-s-cricket-could-catch-on-in-the-uae-1.472813 this article might also count as significant coverage. The second article definitely addresses her directly. I'm not sure how in detail it needs to be to be considered significant, but for me it's got enough details. These are the only two articles I could find online that had more than a trivial mention of her (and they're also the two articles that were brought up in the previous AfD), so if either of these doesn't count as significant coverage then I'll change my vote to delete unless another source comes up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per the evidence provided by TripleRoryFan. Assuming, ''arguendo'', that the coverage received in the two articles provided by TripleRoryFan is substantive, it still lacks the necessary "multiple" independent and secondary sources required to pass the muster at  and .  The subject also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:NCRIC)

Comment: per my above comments. I also have concerns of a cricket player, failing  but supposedly passing WP:GNG because of one source, centered specifically on the aspect of playing cricket, as advancing notability. There cannot be a double standard. If the subject is not notable as a cricket player then how in the world can she be otherwise considered notable to pass GNG? As an inquiring mind I would also wonder what happened after the 2015 season? If a considered sports reported "fame" of two seasons in not fleeting then what would constitute enduring notability? Did she quit to fall off the radar from 2016 to 2019 when it appears she turns 19
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)