Deletion of Crime in Alabama

Comment: The situation in the AfDd articles sharply differs from stubs of stand-alone subjects. Articles at hand should be viewed as subsidiaries of Crime in the United States and in this particular case often its topical "mains". Each subsidiary article needs to have sufficient information to justify its existence. There is no question of  or OT. If somebody cares enough these articles can be revisited. In the meantime, when opening a zillion articles rehashing the same information, typically the subsidiary articles fall behind and offer a poor user experience. Or the parent articles might – this is equally bad. The main question here is how to organize information right and represent the best interests of the user
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: A U.S. state is large enough for crime to be notable, and |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: WP:CONFUSESTUB|Do not confuse stub status with non-notability.  No reason given to delete and it can certainly be shown that notability of each topic has been achieved per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is  and there is significant coverage of crime levels in individual US states
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE)