Deletion of Tony Tenpenny

Comment: Nashville isn't classified as a global city by any of the standard indexing organizations that we turn to for that determination: I can easily find coverage of its ''efforts'' to ''attain'' global city status, but self-branding isn't how a city gets that designation — it has to be ''conferred'' by an external organization, and isn't a title cities can just hand themselves. So no, Nashville's local municipal councillors don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing as municipal councillors, and his only path to inclusion is if he can be well-sourced as much more nationally significant than the norm for non-global city councillors. But a small blip of coverage about the irony of his dying of COVID-19 soon after labelling the disease as a hoax just makes him a , not a person who would pass the |ten year test for enduring nationalized significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:10YT)

Comment: Borderline case depending on whether Nashville Metro Council meets {{u|Bearcat}}'s criteria for a city of global importance, but otherwise Tenpenny would not meet . I agree with the assessment by {{u|cobaltcigs}} in their above case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: The expectation under  is that a city councilmember should receive international or national coverage that is much more than the average municipal official
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)