Deletion of List of criticism and critique articles (2nd nomination)

Comment: not needed, and as people have said, essentially private to WP and also indiscriminate as thousands of articles have sections (or unnamed paragraphs) on criticism. If it's a personal selection of such articles, then it falls foul . It must go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The grouping of articles- hence the basis for this article- is . Does not make sense to try to catalog every WP article with criticisms of the subject, for example it would also need to include any articles with text about criticisms of a topic. This list would be so large that it's useless. Also, it would be rife for misuse by editors looking to advertise their "criticisms of..." article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: although it's hard to make a policy-based argument because  does appear to allow lists like this – those that "serve as natural tables of contents and indexes of Wikipedia". I agree with the point made in the previous AfD that a wider discussion about the appropriateness of indexes would be more constructive than nominating individual lists for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: I fail to see why we should delete it just because there's a category, when  says that isn't a reason for deletion: "For example, since editors differ in style, some favor building lists while others favor building categories, allowing links to be gathered in two different ways, with lists often leapfrogging categories, and vice versa
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLT)