Deletion of BitchX

Comment: A7) article does not assert notability.  Failing that, it doesn't pass  due to not establishing notability with multiple significant secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Major unix terminal IRC client, mentioned in quite a few sources such as those mentioned by others and in the article. Slightly |ignoring the rules in that most of the coverage isn't in huge depth, but with the justification that not a lot of people write about unix terminal IRC clients (they're not the sexiest topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: my argument was put on the basis that whether or not the subject is notable, it's not asserted in the article.  Nothing in the article suggests why this software is more notable than any other software, and as such it can't pass .  If it's won awards in Linux Magazine, that may well found a claim of notability - would you consider adding that information, with citations, to the article?  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Please see the criteria for #A7|CSD A7. A7 does not apply to software
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)