Deletion of Arthur Bell (cricketer)

Comment: Meets . Nominator didn't do a WP:BEFORE to show the opposite. The nominator nominated (automatically) a large amount of cricketeers. It would have been better to made a bunch of them in one nomination. As seen above, the nominator is not willing the write a reply at everey AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Passes  as per above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Passes . The nom made a recent Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#RfC_on_NCRIC|failed RfC to remove the said notability requirements. Since then, they have tried to circumnavigate this by making mass redirects instead. The nom has said that they "Special:Diff/995494268|have no beef with Lugnuts", however following their failed RfC, have seemingly gone out of their way to target artciles I've worked on. Another Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_WP:NSPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|RfC on sporting articles closed with the comments "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". And yet, there have been 25+ AfDs logged by Fram in a 15/20 minute window, indicating no  was used
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:BEFORE)