Deletion of Multiplicity (psychology) (2nd)

Comment: While the article is not in a good state, I don't find the delete rationale at all convincing. We have many articles on indubitably notable concepts where we can't give an unambiguous definition because it is a matter of controversy: among the level 2 vital articles, I'd single out life, the arts, and logic as examples. We don't delete articles because they are a bit confused, we delete them because it is easier to start over than to work with what's there (see ), which is not the case that is being made here. Can {{u|Vitalis196}} rework the delete rationale if  is what is sought? Otherwise I will !vote keep. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:TNT)