Deletion of Another Earth 2010

Comment: The little coverage that has been found is mostly passing mentions in articles on other subjects, except for one local paper article about the production. Incubation would be reasonable if there was a high likelihood of the film becoming notable in the future, but it is an independent film by a seemingly non-notable director (the link to his name in the article goes to a different person named "Mike Cahill", unless the director also happens to be a retired professional tennis player), with a cast of non-star actors. Perhaps it will break through, but many small films do not. If that happens, a new article can be created or the old one revived via 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: Indie film that doesn't meet any of the elements of  even were it released, which it has not been.  Of the three references listed by Some Jerk, as he says, one is a mirror of a second, which is an article on the ''director'' of the movie, not on the movie itself, and so fails as a reference.  This leaves a single reference, which doesn't satisfy .  Beyond that, the general criterion on  holds that only "full-length featured newspaper articles from ''large circulation newspapers'' " (emphasis mine) counts as valid refs.  The degree to which the ''New Haven Register,'' with only a third the circulation of the ''Hartford Courant'' and isn't even widely circulated beyond its home two counties in Connecticut, is a "large circulation newspaper" I leave up to your opinions, but I wouldn't think it was one myself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTFILM||WP:V||WP:NOTFILM)