Deletion of Adam Millson (2nd nomination)

Comment: I contested the PROD, but I appear to have misread something when I did.  I was under the impression Boston United was part of Football Conference, but that is not actually the case.  Many players in that league are notable, but few in their actual Northern Premier League are notable.  It could be argued that Millson technically meets the |GNG with these sources: http://www.skegnessstandard.co.uk/sport/Skegness-player-Adam-Millson-clears.5209477.jphttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_conf/7975326.stmhttp://www.skegnessstandard.co.uk/sport/Skegness-footballers-are-all-heart.4843745.jp plus being part of numerous team articles (including being one of only 3 players kept at the end of the season).  If any player on the team is notable, it is probably Millson, but I am doubtful that any player is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: playing for a football team at this level doesn't make you notable enough for an article automatically, and there are no sources showing he is notable for a different reason. He is still only 19 though, so he could become notable later in his career, but  applies until he actually is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)