Deletion of Geoff Bryan

Comment: 20 odd related pages on the NZ Herald website alone, interviews in The Listener and The Press, an entry in the IMDb. He is regularly in the (non-TVNZ) news as well as reporting it. I think a step was missed from : "If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I was originally going to vote delete in agreement with the nom, in the sense that while he is well known, it is only because he is doing his job. However  says ''"is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published, secondary source material"''. After sifting thru google, weeding out all the ones that just referred to him doing his job, I found this http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3560/features/11582/geoff_bryan_.html. So I believe he passes. I do however disagree with the argument that he is notable just because he is known from TV. That just makes him known, not necessarily notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)