Deletion of Henry Elkins

Comment: the only claim to notability is his connection to MLK.  Since notability is not inherited, I would delete as non-notable.  Coverage is a threshold question for notability, but alone does grant it. Clearly he is verifiable.  Whether or not there is significant coverage here has not been specifically addressed, just asserted.  See ''"Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article'' otability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: passes , , . Main issue is lack of in-depth sources. I think the footnote in ''The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr., Volume VII'' is sufficiently in-depth. I've added another mention from the ''Greensboro Record'' using genealogy bank (which does not have clippings), but which is an in-passing announcement of a talk he was giving about sit-ins and mentions his position
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: While researching is difficult, and finding sources online for this time period is difficult, with the extra sourcing which has been added, I think this person overcomes the "inherited notability" for his relationship to King, and now meets  on his own
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)