Deletion of Mike Broihier

Comment: He's only notable for being a political candidate, and he fails that test - the article was properly redirected to the election in which he participated, and about five weeks ago a user who has now been banned for being a sock recreated the article. The election was a week ago. He has no other notability apart from being a candidate, and while he does pass  that's irrelevant as there's only coverage of him as a candidate. I do not mind if the redirect to the election is restored, but he should NOT have his own article, and precedent is clear on this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  and . His only notability derives from running in a primary in which he came third. Unless he does something else in the future he doesn't have any lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in political party primaries, but this article demonstrates neither that he had preexisting notability for other reasons before running and losing in a primary, nor a credible reason why his candidacy could be considered more special than everybody else's candidacies. The mere existence of some campaign coverage is not in and of itself enough to exempt him from having to pass , because ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election can ''always'' show some evidence of campaign coverage. And no, candidates are also not handed any extra notability points on the basis of who did or didn't endorse them, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: All the sourcing is built around his candidacy, so this fails  and is a  situation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BLP1E)