Deletion of Relentless: The Struggle for Peace in the Middle East (2nd nomination)

Comment: If nothing else is to be added in this discussion to further strengthen the film's notability, suffice it to say that at least two of the sources listed in the first debate satisfy 's requirement of "significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject"; those sources are http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MH&s_site=miami&p_multi=MH&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0FCBDC44C16D86A7&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM Miami Herald and http://www.jewishjournal.com/arts/article/looking_for_truth_in_documentaries_20030530/ Jewish Journal. Both sources are reliable per  and independent of the subject. The coverage in the sources is significant per GNG's definition of "significant": "sources address the subject directly in detail, so Wikipedia:No original research|no original research is needed to extract the content"; each article mentions more than just the screening information, it addresses the subject in detail. If it seems that either of those two sources, or any other ones for that matter, do not speak of the film as the main topic, GNG also specifically states that "significant" coverage does not require the subject matter to "be the main topic of the source material". Further, the information in both articles is stated explicitly so that  is not violated. In my opinion, the first debate addressed the issue of notability in a permanent manner and this re-hashing of almost identical arguments is somewhat unnecessary and really presents nothing new regarding the issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:OR)