Deletion of Mutual energy principle

Comment: It's beyond me to evaluate whether there is actually some fundamental discovery here that will revolutionise the world of physics - but then again, that's not what Wikipedia is for.  We don't publish novel ideas. After this principle/theory has been thoroughly digested, reviewed, verified by repeated experiments, and incorporated into generally accepted science - then it should have an article here.  At the moment it is |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: well, the real issue of course is , and the refs make it clear this is a single-man or rather single-lab project. This being said, I scanned quickly through the contents, and while there are no outright calculations mistakes or other egregious stuff, this has a few hallmarks of  (especially in the "conclusion" section) - I could develop if really needed, but I am not sure that is a worthwhile use of time here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: per . It's just original research, which is not what we publish. There's lots of peer-reviewed journals for that stuff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: as basically exactly the kind of thing  was invented to stop
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: as unmitigated junk. Formally 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)