Deletion of Scott Alexander (3rd nomination)

Comment: I was the declining administrator for speedy deletion; my reasoning was that (a) it was not an attack page, as everything was sourced appropriately and (b) I deemed that there were sufficient improvements from the previous version - there were only about 5 or 6 sources quoted then, there are now lots more, and these are from reasonable third party sources.  Having said that, the tone is completely wrong for Wikipedia, he is only notable for  so unless there is a complete rewrite to bring it in line with BLP, then the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Per Carrite and Dennis Brown above. This is essentially a case of  and/or , in that the tabloid-based reporting about one eccentric purchase made by the subject of this article is not sufficient to show notability or to justify a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BLP)