Deletion of 2005 English cricket season (8–30 April)

Comment: though it pains me to say so after people have put such a huge amount of work into the articles. Although they are currently largely unsourced, it would be easy to find sources.  But the issue is that the whole series of articles is just  coverage that would be perfect in a newspaper, which |Wikipedia is not, or a Wisden|season almanac
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: or partially '''merge''' any useful content. We have an article, 2005 English cricket season, I don't see the need to have arbitrary sub-topics on that. I agree with Dricherby that the coverage here is trivial (I'm basing that comment on 2005 English cricket season (8–30 April), it can be disregarded if that article is not representative.) These articles may be  to some people, but in my opinion, they are outside the scope of an encyclopedia. Special:Contributions/109.77.136.224|109.77.136.224
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)