Deletion of Mabel Richardson (2nd nomination)

Comment: I see two claims to notability. The first one is that Richardson was a Hollywood actress. However, she has played only very minor roles, so she fails to meet . The second claim is that she is a supercentenarian and longest-lived film actor, but the significance of this is not covered by "multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." () The Press-Telegram articles, which are the sources for many statements in this WP article, do not appear to meet this standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BASIC)

Comment: As per nom. Fails . Therefore also fails  (as being a supercentenarian is, as has been repeatedly shown in Afds, insufficient and falls under ). DerbyCountyinNZ
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:1E)