Deletion of List of songs whose title does not appear in the lyrics

Comment: Utter listcruft in clear violation of . These songs have nothing whatsoever in common other than this one quirk of lexicography and therefore it is quite clearly a list of indiscriminate information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:UNENC)

Comment: It might be rare in something like ''modern rock'' for song lyrics not to include their title, but this (|unsourced) claim simply doesn't apply to ''all'' music. As Charlene has noted above, every instrumental song ever written would have to be included here, and there there are plenty of classical songs, with vocalists, but with titles like "Opus No. 4". There simply would be no end to this list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: this, like many other lists of songs based on the title, bring together songs which have nothing in common thematically. It is therefore a #DIR|directory of loosely-associated topics and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Violates  (and, although not a policy, it borderlines on ).  It's a non-discriminate list of information which, if given the chance, can grow to enormous length and little purpose.  Surely there's a better way to organize lists of songs.  Also, I ''strongly'' disagree with the above suggestion of adding "popular" to the list title; it's a blatant violation of ; who's to say which song is popular?  Bestselling would make more sense, and yet there's still an issue with what songs should be listed.  "List of bestselling songs of the last three decades whose title does not appear in the lyrics that is of course if the song has lyrics to begin with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:CRUFT||WP:NPOV)