Deletion of List of college football head coaches with non-consecutive tenure

Comment: Does not meet  because there hasn't been significant coverage of these people ''as a group''. There is http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/big12/2009-07-22-kansas-state-snyder_N.htm only one instance I can find where these people are treated as a group, and this is just a sidebar to an article and is not enough on its own to establish significant coverage under  and . Other citations provided are 1) http://heismanpundit.com/2008/11/26/you-cant-go-home-again/ a blog that is not a  and 2) http://a.espncdn.com/ncf/news/2003/0219/1511448.html an article that doesn't treat these people as a class in any depth. What we have here are trivial treatments at best. I could find nothing additional that would support these. Hence delete is the appropriate course
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTN||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: I do not see evidence that this "has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources" as LISTN requires other than in passing or as a comparison. As a bit of |OR, it might be an interesting cut at the coaching data, but OR is not permitted here, of course. And I don't see this as a useful navegational aid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I'm still not seeing the multiple non-trivial sources to satisfy  that I would prefer.  I don't feel strongly enough about the subject to subjectively keep or delete, so I'm neutral unless something changes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: As Paul McDonald points out above via links, the list topic has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources as required by Wikipedia:LISTN. Requirements such as "this is a topic that receives widespread independent coverage", "that this is a notable topic via "multiple, independent sources"?", "a really short "blog-esque" post that lists a few coaches who came back", "the multiple non-trivial sources to satisfy WP:LISTN", and ""The phenomenon of coaches returning to previous schools." The latter is what would be needed to justify this article" are not in Wikipedia:LISTN. In addition to meeting LISTN, the list meets : it is a valuable information source and provides navigation and development purposes. References are easy enough to add - I started from the top and quickly sourced the first five entries in the list.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_college_football_head_coaches_with_non-consecutive_tenure&oldid=516800843 Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: So far keeps seem to be  !votes, with no evidence to-date that the group, not just the individuals, have been discussed in reliable sources to meet LISTN
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: per Paul McDonald and Uzma Gamal: passes , worthwhile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)