Deletion of Steve Turley

Comment: I concur with {{ping|DGG}}. The subject has co-authored with other writers and has received no awards and no significant, nor wide coverage in independent publications. As a high-school teacher and part-time adjunct, the subject fails  and . Fails  as well. Perhaps with time, it will happen. As of now, the article still does not meet notability guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: sourcing is poor - very little that can be described as a reliable source.  A Google search uncovers little else besides his videos on Youtube, and op eds. Fails . Arguments for keep claim one of his books is notable - if so, it should have the article, not him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This 2015 scholarly book is sufficiently widely reviewed to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: seems to meet , per User:Bcschneider53's reasoning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: per nom. No in-depth coverage can be found except for Christian trade publications. The subject has written one book from a small press with no independent third-party reliable source coverage. Does not pass uthor and , and notability has not been met for . The article has a promotional feel to it. Fails notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)