Deletion of Əngəlan

Comment: this is a  nomination. I have had a long conversation (see our talk pages) with the nominator and his problems with GeoNet Names Server are the same problems we have with any other reliable source. I told him how to find sources, but rather than do so, he prefers drama here and wastes everybody's time. A simple google search on the alternate name "Angalan" shows 2760 hits, including maplandia, fallingrain, Yet Another Atlas, and Travelpost. Under Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names), if there is a Widely accepted English name for a place, it is used, if not the local form. Given that the nominator is not even convinced that the place exists (his  vs. reliable sources) it seems hardly fit to assume that there is a widely accepted English form. Hence, the local one is used for the title of the article. If we don't like that result, perhaps we should revisit the naming convention and move the article to one of the alternative names. Deletion is wholly unwarranted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:OR)

Comment: Ëzhiki and others have enough sources to prove that the village existed at some point. That is enough to satisfy  requirements. Notability should not be an issue for settlements considering that this is the kind of subject which is traditionally covered in encyclopedias, commercial paper encyclopedias often cover settlements which are very small. The fact that a village is abandoned is no more relevant to notability than the death of a subject is to his/her notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)