Deletion of Andrew Jackson Jihad 3

Comment: I voted delete in the original 'articles for deletion' debate, but I am voting keep, due to the fact that the previous nomination ended merely hours before the opening of this one. If you want to obtain another consensus on the issue, then it would be more prudent to give the article some more time before doing so, Give the article and band in question at least a couple of months to see if it can satisfy the  guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: This just doesn't meet , despite a yeoman's effort on the part of Pars to try and do everything that can be done. There just isn't the material here to build an article with the proper foundation of sources, and that's why we have notability standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Fails . Has won local contests and was featured in our local alternative newspaper.  Good for a non-notable myspace band, but a non-notable myspace band nonetheless. The band can check back in a few years when they've hit the charts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: does not meet . Even if this was closed 2 hours ago, it's still not a notable group. I don't believe there's a statuatory time limit on AfD's of "no consensus" anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)