Deletion of Osadolor Nate Asemota

Comment: This draft reads as if it was written with a |conflict of interest.  Since the author says that there is no conflict of interest, the good-faith assumption is just that it is |non-neutral writing about a marginally notable person.  Therefore
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Although the author obviously makes all efforts to improve the article, which should be applauded, effort alone does unfortunately not qualify an article for the English Wikipedia. I can't give a fully confident vote, as I know little about the quality / category of Nigerian newspapers / websites, but https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Osadolor+Nate+Asemota%22+-wikipedia my initial search any any following search hasn't turned up any results (including for "Dr. Dolor"). Sources are mostly blog entries, as already mentioned, and seem to have been written | very close to the subject. And even if they, or some of them, were |verifyable and |reliable, they all seem to not establish |notability in either case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Thanks are due to {{u|Nightfury}} for reopening this. I'm having serious doubts regarding the sources provided, which I suspect in no way qualify as |reliable or particularly |in-depth or even independent as required by the most basic requirements of : they appear to be almost exclusively blogs and social media outlets. I'm sure {{u|Bishonen}} would agree it's times like this we more than ever miss {{u|Oluwa2Chainz
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:INDEPTH||WP:ANYBIO)