Deletion of Espen Gaarder Haug (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm not finding in-depth reviews of his books, and having only two publications that are anything like well-cited is not enough for . (He coauthored with Nassim Nicholas Taleb, but notability is |not transmitted across coauthorship links.) His physics "work" has been rightly ignored by the scientific community
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per . His "The complete guide to option pricing formulas" is well-cited but that seems to be the only claim to fame. It's not enough by itself to convince me of a pass of #C1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:PROF)

Comment: as in 1st Afd. It is instructive to look at the subject's profile on Google scholar.https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NXuz8N4AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra The physics papers are free of content and supported only by self-citations. There are a few high-cited finance papers, but with an h-index of only 10, not enough to pass rof. The only possibility of notability that I see is  for the subject's success in bamboozling credulous Quantitative analyst|quants with Not even wrong|junk science, but I don't think this is enough. The scholar profile is strange, having several "publications" without any source. It makes me wonder if it possible to game that database
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: Agree with the nominator on lack of notability and add that the article also appears to violate .  See, for example, the contributions of {{User contributions name|Green2Ocean}},{{User contributions name|DrRiskMaster}}, {{User contributions name|GoldenPi}}, {{User contributions name|88.89.96.208}}, and {{User contributions name|88.128.85.173}}. From the history, it appears that the earlier decision to delete was never implemented
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIOG)