Deletion of Bradley C. Edwards

Comment: The two keep arguments are silly, on the one hand, a h-index of 11 is very low, so he fails , and on the other some argument about  significance is another non-argument. Fails  == no article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:BASIC)

Comment: or merge to space elevator per . On the one hand, the citation record does indicate that he's the world's leading expert on space elevators. On the other, everything there is to be said about his work on space elevators makes more sense to say as part of the space elevator article than as part of a biography, and there doesn't appear to be much else of note to say about him
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: The person clearly meets , even if only because he's been interviewed several times, in a non peripheral way, and he has appeared in TV programs including SPACE ELEVATOR - NOVA SCIENCE NOW - Discovery/Space/Universe. The suggestion by James5000 that  disqualifies is flawed because that talks about single events, but he's famous for work that he did over some years, and he's also an author and well respected researcher. I agree that he's borderline on a strict publication count on , but that's irrelevant because he so clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:1E||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: His citations would appear to satisfy :1. Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The article simply lack sources to prove that the subject meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)