Deletion of James Ricky Coward

Comment: Vanity article which fails  and . Most of the references are simply a link which establishes the existence of the thing referenced (various boxers, the Camden County Prosecutor's Office), and do not mention Coward, meaning that the majority of the text is primary research. Others are passing mentions in minor articles about other matters, aside from the single 'HITC' source from 2013, which is not itself a notable news source as far as I can see.  The only reference in which Coward is the sole subject is a non-independent advertisement for his services, which advises on where one might purchase his DVDs. In sum, conducting padwork with a number of pro boxers is not sufficient to have a wikipedia entry about you, no matter how you fluff it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBOX)

Comment: Appears to fail . Referencing is poor: most of the links are broken or too vague to be of use (e.g. a link to the main page of the DoJ website doesn't help find a document). I don't know if FightHype meets  but the cited article says very little about Coward anyway, and doesn't establish notability.http://www.fighthype.com/news/article15264.html Aside from that, there are only passing mentions of him as a coach to fighters. Only other materials I can find online are (a) his videos and (b) random people who're certainly not |valid sources being rude about his videos. If his videos were reviewed by reputable publications or there was in-depth coverage of his boxing career or career as a coach (meaning coverage of him not his fighters), he would meet ; but I can't see any suitable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom.  Vanity article fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:GNG)

Comment: The coverage is insufficient to meet  and I don't see any SNG criteria that he meets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)