Deletion of Centsports (2nd nomination)

Comment: Besides the http://www.forbes.com/2008/06/12/online-gambling-centsports-ent-manage-cx_jb_0612onlinegambling.html Forbes articles, I was able to find one other |independent source about Centsports, which was discussing the company's possibly illegal conduct.https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:-V-Oq2f0MyUJ:documents.jdsupra.com/cc27015b-487a-41ff-878a-911a99023804.pdf+centsports+employees&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj_MvlmeoyzeyCnYMWCPYiVbPsbwSTnTpig1Hjwinc6IOCE9xYTZCSlQiditSiZyimuGVHMnaZ9rvARckMtsbBchN6mtImIa8H66UrzSyy_wPWbLesqf6Nk5GrD2rt6K1pqDK8k&sig=AHIEtbQtvd46C5cjx9klI82bv6LwWgx-Kg I was not able to find out any information about the size of Centsports, which is now part of FreeSportsBet.com.  Neither Centsports or FreeSportsBet is listed by Manta, thus indicating that they might be a very small operation.  Article reads like an |advertisement, and despite a couple of independent sources, the subject matter is not |notable. Although a case can be made that Centsports possibly meets Wikipedia's |corporate notability guideline, because the company's references are largely discussing the legality of Centsports' acts, I think that Wikipedia's |event notability guideline should be the governing policy.   requires extensive, long-lasting, and deep coverage, which this article doesn't have
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:ADVERT||WP:NOTE||WP:CORP||WP:EVENT||WP:EVENT)

Comment: spaced ndash}} The topic meets passes  per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)