Deletion of Houston Fields

Comment: County sheriffs are not automatically presumed notable just because they're technically verifiable to one brief blurb in a local history book — they can clear the bar for inclusion ''if'' they're the subject of enough media coverage to clear , but there's no evidence of that being shown here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The cyclopedia reference undoubtedly about him is a decent one, but there is insufficient evidence of standalone notability at this point.  and WP:deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion all specify that options to deletion should be considered. There is content here that could be merged and at a minimum redirected to the proposed target.{{pb}}As stated in the header of this (and every other) AfD: '''"When discussing an article, remember to consider alternatives to deletion. If you think the article could be a disambiguation page, redirected or merged to another article, then consider recommending "Disambiguation", "Redirect" or "Merge" instead of deletion. Similarly, if another editor has proposed an alternative to deletion but you think the article should be deleted instead, please elaborate why
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)