Deletion of Shelley Sweeney

Comment: If she works primarily in Japan, then there may be some Japanese-language sourcing I don't have the ability to find or read — so I'm certainly willing to reconsider this if somebody with Japanese language skills can show evidence that better sources about her actually exist. But actors aren't handed an automatic notability freebie just because the article lists roles, because ''every'' actor can ''always'' list roles by ''definition'' — the key to passing NACTOR #1 is not the list of roles itself, but the depth of |reliable source ''media'' coverage she did or did not receive ''for'' having roles. And conversely, we also don't keep poorly sourced articles just because better sourcing ''might'' exist than anybody has actually been arsed to show — the key to saving a badly sourced article is to ''show'' hard evidence that better sourcing ''does'' exist to repair the problem with. So, again, if somebody can show that she has more coverage in Japanese-language sources than we can find in English, then I'll reconsider — but it will take ''showing'' that such sources ''do'' exist, not just idly speculating about the possibility that such sources ''might'' exist, to turn the tide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Another old article that didn't make it pass  talk less of . I have seen a couple passing mention and a press release but nothing significant. Meanwhile nominator should do well to check the criteria of which he used as reason for nomination as  doesn't apply to people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTRESS||WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)