Deletion of Kinetic Finance Limited Scam

Comment: I do think this event is notable and that it passes the criteria for .  Only just, but enough for me to want the article to remain
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a tough one, but I think it hasn't passed the significant coverage guideline under . I searched around as much as I could and could only find http://news.oneindia.in/2007/10/09/hc-dismisses-arun-firodias-plea-1191996042.html this report from UNI, an Indian news agency. It feels to me like a minor scam that hasn't attracted a ton of coverage. I'd like to see coverage in major Indian newspapers, etc., but I simply can't find it. Is there any evidence that it exists? Until we see some, I think delete is the correct call. The sources cited (and others that I found) are people's blogs and websites, which hardly qualify as . Some of the keeps seem to be based upon . "No reason to be deleted" is also not a reason for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOHARM)

Comment: Searching Google News and Google News Archives for ("kinetic finance" default) turned up a single hit: this article.  Searching for ("kinetic finance" fraud) and ("kinetic finance" scam) yielded ditto.  Searching the ''Times of India'' website for ("kinetic finance") with date range January 1, 2001--October 20, 2011 produced no hits at all.  Searching the website of ''The Hindu'' for ("kinetic finance") with date range January 1, 2003--October 20, 2012 also produced no hits at all.  There appears to be a fairly clear  failure here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE)