Deletion of Comparison of traffic signs in English-speaking countries

Comment: Seems like  for me, unless somebody can dig up a study or two on the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Because  and .  Yeah, I know, that's not a very good argument, but sometimes you just gotta go with your gut
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IAR)

Comment: while unconventional, I don't see any policies or guidelines this article violates.  It offers no advice on these symbols, so it doesn't fail .  At the end of the day |Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and encyclopedias are meant to provide interesting information.  This information is both useful and interesting and therefore encyclopedic.  It doesn't fail  and it seems to pass  which are the classic policies/guidelines applied in AfDs like this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:WINC||WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: as Dr. Strauss states |Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and the visual representation should be useful for readers, albeit uninteresting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WINC)

Comment: per RoySmith. Even a stickler to the rules like me thinks such articles should be kept because they are extremely interesting and useful and Wikipedia would be worse off by deleting it. I'm certain |someone has already discussed the (subtle) differences between such roadsigns before Wikipedia was invented and that it is thus not OR because it contains no new ideas. I also think comparing English-speaking countries is a good idea because they are likely all being influenced due to the shared language. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)