Deletion of Confederate (TV series)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: There are sufficient sources to satisfy the , which is all that matters here, and which  is merely a descendant of that attempts to suss out good rules of thumb for when something is likely to be notable.  Strictly ''as a TV show'' this doesn't qualify as notable of course, but it qualifies anyway due to the wide interest and media coverage of it for non-produced-episode related reasons.  See List of television series canceled before airing an episode for a list of notable topics that nevertheless failed as TV shows.  Note, that as a side issue, it may be reasonable to move this article to Confederate (proposed TV series) if it is considered REALLY important to make clear that it doesn't exist yet, but that's not really that important
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TVSHOW)

Comment: I don't see how  can override , which this meets handily. Maybe it would be better titled something like Confederate TV series controversy|''Confederate'' TV series controversy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:GNG)

Comment: A TV series or other creative work can still be notable even if it is not produced or released if its meets . That, I think, is clearly the case, given the great amount of substantial, reliably sourced coverage cited in the article. The topic appears significant both as part of the ''oeuvre'' of noted TV creators David Benioff and D. B. Weiss, and for the criticism and other reactions it engendered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)