Deletion of InnerSloth

Comment: or '''Redirect''' Leaving aside the question of redirection for the moment, first off, notability is not inherited. Even if they created the world's most famous video game of all time (they didn't), we need to see references *about the company*. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. Based on that, none of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/. As to whether there is potential in the future for an article as stated above - I would say this topic hasn't come close to meeting the criteria. If it was a case that there were a number of references which came close, a redirect would make more sense but for now, no need for a redirect. In the future, if and when it becomes notable, then an article can easily be created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Redirect''' The new articles that have been provided in the AfD by Right cite talk significantly about InnerSloth, and clearly shows an increased interest in InnerSloth. However, the main topic is Among Us. At most, the articles direct focus on InnerSloth's actions and developments pertaining to the game. No media or news source finds InnerSloth notable enough to write about them as its own topic. InnerSloth's notability clearly hasn't been established per . And so InnerSloth simply doesn't have the notability to keep the Wikipedia article on the subject. Also, to respond to the people that think InnerSloth should not redirect to Among Us: Among Us is by far the most notable thing that InnerSloth has done. The next notable thing, Henry Stickmin, does not even have a Wikipedia page. Reading the guidelines on redirecting, there does not seem to be any rules that are against redirecting. Among Us being a topic that is relevant to the topic of InnerSloth, and Among Us being by far the most notable thing, and the only notable topic closely related to InnerSloth, it would be best suited that InnerSloth redirects to Among Us. If InnerSloth becomes successful in creating another notable product, but still isn't notable enough to have its own page, then deleting the redirect could be considered due to unjustified emphasis of Among Us
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: BTW, as the article currently stands Among Us is mentioned more times in it then the company is. Yet somehow the article, and the sources it's based on, are about the company and not the game. Right....At this point it's just a glorified  of Among Us
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: After reading the article, checking all of the references, and reading this very long discussion. It was very clear that the company is not notable and the article subject doesn't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: UPDATE. after all, it really can't be carried by Among Us's notability as per . But I believe it can be notable in the future but as per , we can't have an article about it '''yet'''. So if considering for a redirect to Among Us also, for me, it's not worth it because Among Us can't explain what InnerSloth is. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: to Among Us for now. It has been well demonstrated that Among Us is notable, and that its developers have received coverage through that game. What has not -- insofar as I have seen so far -- been demonstrated is that the notability extends beyond Among Us. That doesn't mean they aren't notable, but that |we don't need two articles based on the same coverage. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)