Deletion of 2013 Vauxhall helicopter crash

Comment: possibly with snow). As others note this easily meets the , there are at least two investigations and reports currently ongoing into this (the review ordered into helicopter flights over London and the AAIB investigation) - it is not speculation to say that there will be significant media coverage when these reports are released. Even if it isn't notable according to the latest guidelines for air accidents (which have gone through many changes), it is unarguably a notable event for London and for air transport in the United Kingdom (about a week's disruption to transport, several days intense media coverage, international media coverage and continuing national media coverage. And per all the other keeps
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This event was absolutely notable by  no matter how many other notablilty guidelines it fails to satisfy. The event absolutely dominated most major UK news outlets for the entire day. Rolling news channels covered it exclusively for hours. The low number of deaths and injuries is irrelevant. It was a spectacular disaster which caused disruption to a portion of central London for several days
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems to exceed the requirements of our |GNG by some margin. Enduring effects argument is countered by  in our GNG: "Notability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: as  - even the nominator admits "the formal accident investigation has not been completed" so this nomination is premature at best. Having read the talk page and nomination I don't understand why one or two editors seem so determined to get this deleted ASAP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:NOTIMELIMIT)