Deletion of Christine Fang

Comment: BIO1E does not apply in this instance, since there was more than one politician involved.  Easily passes  as shown in Forevertruthsayer's analysis. Especially since the scandal just continues to grow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As I read the article, this individual didn't commit any crime, was tracked by the government (who reportedly are tracking 2,000 other Chinese visa holders), was never convicted or even accused of a crime. I'm sure that the government has thousands of cases of people they deem "suspicious" who do not have bios here and I think this violates |BLP and is more salacious than informative. The article's use of "relationship" implies a sexual or romantic connection without actually proving anything of that nature exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per  and ; do not redirect. This is a blatantly non-neutral article on Chinese intelligence activities hanging on a stub biography of a non-notable individual. |Wikipedia is not a tabloid. This should have been speedy deleted at the start of this discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTTABLOID)

Comment: I believe this is currently a BLP1E situation where there shouldn't be a standalone article. The 1E being the Axios report itself. All pertinent information can be put into the Swalwell article without necessarily naming her due to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:SUSPECT)

Comment: The above analysis spells out very clearly why this article is suitable for inclusion and deletion is unnecessary. It may need a clean-and-watch in some ways but 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: BLP1E. Also concur with Liz, and Morbidthoughts on renaming the article -- if the crime itself is worthy of its own article (which, at this point is still dubious) beyond trimmed down inclusion in Eric_Swalwell, it should be titled after the crime. I see no good argument here on why Fang should have a BLP here. Not to mention the glaring  violation, given that Fang is obviously |low profile and thus protected by BLPCRIME, and it appears she has not been convicted of any crime. So the very existence of this article is a BLP violation, and I see no way to remedy that at this period in time other than by deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME||WP:LPI)