Deletion of Pricing Partners SAS

Comment: Hi Smartse, understood your point. It was not a deal that I suggested but rather a way to solve this issue (smile). And as noted, we will have problem with the fact that the page may be |salted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: I just noticed that Pricing Partners is |salted suggesting a pretty concerted effort to create an article here. If this closes as delete, further applications of salt may be needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: I've had a look for more reliable sources and found a fair few e.g. http://www.securitiestechnologymonitor.com/news/-24458-1.html http://pro.01net.com/editorial/342966/pricing-partners-mutualise-la-gestion-des-produits-financiers/ and there are a fair few of articles on factiva published by http://www.bankingtech.com/ Banking Technology. It's difficult to say though whether these are sufficient to show that  is met, as they generally have the look of regurgitated press releases rather than real "significant coverage". I'm sitting on the fence for the moment, but leaning towards delete unless some more solid sources can be found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Non-notable company fails . I did not find much in the way of ''independent'' ''reliable'' sources. Sounds like interesting software, but its ultimately  for a WP article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:TOOSOON)