Deletion of Rich Iott

Comment: The majority of the sources essentially fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: The only issue about well sourced, biography/dominant event articles is the name of the article. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet and whether this is called "War reenactment by Rich Iott", "Rich Iott", "Rich Iott (politician)", etc., there clearly is enough reliable source material to maintain a stand alone article on the topic. Should the article be deleted because the topic fails , , ? Of course not. It is wholly wrong to predetermine a standard (e.g., ) for the reliable source material to meet, and then seek to delete the topic because the reliable sources might not largely write what Wikipedia thinks it should have written about. Wikipedia is a follower of reliable source material, not a dictator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BAND||WP:ATHLETE||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: mentioned only for being a failed election candidate and a minor controversy which arose from that which falls under the terms of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)