Deletion of River Oaks Baptist School

Comment: I think the reporting on the school's e-mail system makes a big deal over very little, and in general, the article seems like a grab-bag of media mentions.  But that's not the issue here -- the issue is  and specifically  (since HS doesn't apply.)  You make no mention whatsoever of awards won, when these might actually be pivotal to the Keep case.  You also don't establish that the ROBS library was given as a merely "typical" example.   It might have been singled out as an example of good library design practice.  And by putting "this school has a quite typical school library" in quotes, you might lead some editors here to think the book actually says that (or some such thing).  It doesn't.  The subtitle of the book ("Drawing on Function and Appeal"), and the lack of any particular criticism of ROBS library in the book's discussion, suggest that this library actually ''was'' selected on the grounds of distinctive "function" and "appeal".  The library coverage, together with details on its (soon retiring) chief administrator and its awards, is part of a case that this is a notably ''excellent'' middle school.  Can you supply more detail on how you believe ROBS fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ORG||WP:NHS||WP:ORG)

Comment: There are verifiable facts about this school, thus  is satisfied. Then there is the notability guideline. There we have ''The ACTFL Melba D Woodruff Award for Exemplary Elementary Foreign Language Program''. Apparently, the ACTFL took note of this school. We also have the Blue Ribbon. Now the main contributer of this article seems to have twisted in all sorts of curious curves, to warp the article around the reliable sources about the cloud email service, which isn't about the school, but about the cloud email, and the article ends up all lopsided. Let's not do that. Lets just have a nice small article, with verifiable information about the school (where it is, how large it is, history), and have the awards that show notability in the lead, and pretty please, let's not include a long story about why, how, and how sucessfully the school employs a cloudbased email solution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: This article has some references, however not enough to satisfy the |general notability guidelines. The article itself doesn't give any indication of sufficient notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)