Deletion of Alex Pyron

Comment: A named assistant professorship is not the type of position that #C5 was intended to cover, and what else is there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=author%3A%22RA+Pyron%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=400000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 GScholar search returns 14 hits; having an article cited 12 or 13 times does not constitute a "significant contribution" to the field, and most articles have far fewer hits.  He may be notable some day, but right now he does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Sources and citations provide no evidence of this guy passing  or . No objection to recreation if he somehow becomes notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Nom's arguments are conlcusive &ndash; this is an uncontroversial delete. I'll just add here that his WoS h-index is only 5, which we would not even consider for a fairly low-citation field (which evo-bio definitely is not). This person could be notable in the future, but right now this article is just . Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION)