Deletion of Smallant1

Comment: Three intellectually separate secondary sources have been sourced (Medium, Polygon, LPB Community Corner), fulfilling  Basic Criteria, as I understand it. As per  Has made 'unique contributions' in the SMO community (see Medium article{{cite web |url=https://medium.com/@william.benson/the-art-of-speed-running-feat-smallant1-keizaron-d8e787b56fa6 |title=The Art of Speed Running (feat. Smallant1 & Keizaron) |author=Zach Benson |date=13 November 2019 |website=Medium (website)|Medium |access-date=24 January 2020}}) and has a sizable following. Subscriber count may be lower than other notable YouTubers, but Smallant1 the is the #1 BOTW and SMO streamer on Twitch
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO||WP:ENT)

Comment: There isn't enough coverage in the sources already in the article to establish notability, and I was unable to find more when I searched myself. Of the sources mentioned by {{u|Lycelsara}}, Medium is |self published and unreliable, the LBP source is an |interview on an extremely niche website which does little to nothing to contribute to notability, and the Polygon article is not particularly significant in its coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB||WP:interview)

Comment: Fails . Does not appear to have notability from significant mentions in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)

Comment: Only three sources have been cited to establish notability. One of which is the "LPB Community Corner" which I do not consider reliable. But even assuming it is it would not matter since  states: "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are '''independent''' of the subject". Interviews are not independent of the subject leaving only two sources to be considered. The Medium (website)|Medium article is a brief paragraph about the subject with the rest of the section being an interview of him (which is not independent of the subject). But even then, Medium (website)|Medium is not a reliable source per . This leaves the Polygon (website)|Polygon article, which is reliable, but only has a brief mention of the subject and one of his videos. Hence fails  and  Basic Criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RSP||WP:GNG||WP:NBIO)