Deletion of Spiritual agnosticism

Comment: per nom unless decent sourcing is found. While the article makes good logical points about the difference between Agnostic theism and Spiritual agnosticism, these points seem to be |original thoughts and are not sourced to Wikipedia's standards. (Nota bene; I have removed two of the sources as completely unacceptable to Wikipedia, being unknown and uncredited blog and website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: It does not seem that sufficient  exist to satisfy  and warrant the topic's existence as a separate article.  It was previously mentioned that "someone at NYU has recently written a paper" and a book entitled''Spiritual Agnosticism'' was published in 1921.  If encyclopedic material based upon these sources is to appear at all, it would be best placed in one of several existing articles which already exist and which have significant overlap in general subject matter, namely Agnosticism, Agnostic theism, and Spiritual but not religious.  Indeed, one of the article's current sources (http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/16/sbnr/) is really about Spiritual but not religious, which is not necessarily the same as "spiritual agnosticism" according to the article's definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)