Deletion of George Horton (YouTube)

Comment: Granted, but this is simply what he is 'best known' for. On that note, would contest that there is a failure of  due to the fact that there is a substantial fanbase, which in turn owes itself to unique contributions to the field of prank comedy of the channel. There are many other videos on the channel with many views; this is not a one hit wonder. Koreanspy12   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: Trivial mentions.  There's no |significant coverage in |reliable sources.  Citations consist only of embedded videos.  There needs to be an actual article about the person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: fails . To be honest, I'd probably support the deletion of the group/channel as failing  too. That they had one video that got some coverage in mainstream media does not make them notable. There are plenty of people who have YouTube videos that have since been featured on compilation shows or even ''"YouTube video of the week"'' news items. The sites hosting copies of the video really don't constitute coverage at all - they are just hosting a copy of the video and the only mention of the group or the individuals involved comes from the in-video credits - the subjects covering themselves - and from comments members of the group have posted into comments sections under some of the videos. The self-promotion is strong with this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORGDEPTH)