Deletion of Very Serious People (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . Article is just an attempt to use Wikipedia for popularizing some obscure American political neologism. Also no redirecting to anywhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: Previous uses are clearly not about the same thing, so this is clearly a . That page says
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: there is overwhelming notability per  as a phrase that has existed since the 1920s
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per --the previous AfD seemed to ignore  completely.  It also seems like the article is mainly an excuse to insult the subjects in the guise of reporting which subjects are being insulted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: easily meets , something apparent from even the most casual perusal of source/search results
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . It's clear that this ''is'' a neologism, and the ''policy'' makes it very clear how you determine if it's notable enough to be kept (sorry for the lengthy copy and paste, but it's too relevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: although it maybe used Wikipedia is |not a dictionary. The subject itself has not received continued significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. I see blurbs of the phrase but nothing that I would consider |significant coverage where the subject of this article is the primary subject of the source. Therefore failing , the subject is not notable, and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDICTIONARY||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia should not have a article on every 'clever' little phrase that becomes popular among the chattering class.   and .  Show me widespread and significant usage and i might change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:GNG)

Comment: This article on a non-notable neologism exists solely to be a  to repeat insults against politicians that editors don't like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: then '''Redirect'''.  Not only is it not notable, there are  violations which continue to pop up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)