Deletion of Shiodome River

Comment: Enough sources to pass . I empathise with Hijiri's point, as the article hasn't progressed a lot since what seems to be a content fork, but nevertheless it has progressed. The translation tag links to a better sourced article on jp-wiki with more content, which highlights the potential of this topic too. I've added the article to a more specific, and less populated translation category, so it's no longer lost in the backlog
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)

Comment: definitely pass , , because it is a permanent natural feature
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOPURP||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: See jawiki article for some history https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B1%90%E7%95%99%E5%B7%9D. Simple Google Books search finds references that substantiate notability claim under . Article can and should be expanded. Additionally, nominator's most recent comment above calls for a merge, which doesn't need to handled at AfD anyway, and redirecting/merging to Shiodome is not obvious, given the history of the river (could also legitimately point to Ginza, Shinbashi, Tokyo Expressway, Hamarikyu Gardens, etc etc). A strange nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)