Deletion of Lengths of science fiction film and television series (3rd nomination)

Comment: it's only been a few months since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lengths of superhero film and television series|the last AfD debate for this article.  Sure, consensus can change, but there's no point in forcing people to make the same arguments every few months.  That said, the article is ''not'' indiscriminate — it's relevant almanac-style information which is neither more nor less encyclopedic than anything in :Category:Sports-related lists; it's just as encyclopedic as List of Hail Marys in American football or List of Indianapolis 500 winning starting positions.  (Note that this is not an argument by , but a pointer to an entire category of lists which have exactly the same justification for existence as this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lengths of superhero film and television series|the results of the AFD from this February.  "|Consensus can change", like "indiscriminate collection of information," are the new ways to say "|I don't like it", it seems.  I don't see that anything has changed significantly since last month, and the |fact that you consider a delete opinion to be eloquently argued is not grounds to ignore prior results or to repetitively nominate the same article for deletion until the "correct" result obtains
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:BASH)

Comment: as disruptive nomination, would support a block to stop any more disruption. The article is still very useful. #PAPER|Wikipedia is ''still'' not paper and it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LIST)

Comment: Fails #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|. Also is original research because it states at the start of the article "This list shows the total running lengths of popular science fiction television and film series.". What defines popular? Previous AfD nominations aside |consensus can change, this list may be useful but that doesn't mean that it belongs here, there are plenty of useful but unencyclopedic deleted from Wikipedia every day because of #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|, it may have "appeal" to many people (myself included, I find it interesting) but that does not mean it should be here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:CCC||WP:NOT)

Comment: This should either include EVERY science fiction TV series and movie, or not exsist at all. The general rule of thumb that I try t use is "would this list pass a FLC?" I would vote No to this list in any form, and I think it is also a violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Then the list needs to be updated to include every science fiction List_of_science_fiction_films|film and :Category:Science_fiction_television_series|television series and then this still fails #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|. The information contained in the list would be far better merged into the articles for each film and series. It is clear by this discussion that the information is valid and deserves a place in Wikipedia but this is not the place for it, the main articles for each film and series would be bettered if they included this information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)