Deletion of Metascience (journal)

Comment: I found two in-depth published reviews in unrelated journals, also establishing its earlier history back to 1984. I think it passes . As for the impact factor, I think that that's almost completely irrelevant. Impact factors tell you something about the spikiness of citations to recent papers in journals for fast-moving journal-based fields. They tell you almost nothing about the typical or median or long-term citations of papers in the same journals. And in this case it's a journal for book reviews in the humanities. Who cites book reviews? That's missing the point of the journal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)