Deletion of Chen Rui

Comment: I'm not seeing significant coverage of the ''subject'', only passing mentions and coverage of bilibili. Even if the article is kept, this is still a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:BLOWITUP)

Comment: looks like someone dropped a  on this article ''to boost the number of footnotes present in the article as high as possible''. When you need 8 refs for the opening sentence just to verify he's an internet entrepreneur and CEO, that indicates a potential issue with  for me. Either '''delete''', or in the alternative, '''redirect''' to bilibili
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB||WP:GNG)

Comment: to billibil per -M|ATD (but maybe salt against recreation); he may become sufficiently notable in the future to warrant an article on the English Wikipedia. That time is not now. This is a case of CEO does what a CEO does with a concomitant layer of promotionalism surrounding him. This is a |BLP, and SOURCES|we should be {{tq|very firm about the use of high-quality sources.}} Likewise, he fails the most basic requirements of WP:ANYBIO. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:BLP||WP:BLPSOURCES)

Comment: The majority of these are junk, capital and share announcements, duplicates of the same articles, passing mentions, press-releases, company and paid profiles, and a whole load of non-RS scrap for an editor who is likely a paid editor and part of the team that does the PR, and who managed to move the article from draft, three times. The article is now junk and should be 'd. It completely ignores Wikipedia policies, as a kind of ''right to exist'' article, because Zuckerberg/Gates has a article. There is 2 references that are full features
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)