Deletion of Limeroad.com

Comment: I'm not really convinced that it meets NCORP and add to that the promo pressure, I go with a delete. The sources are also not very convincing. For example, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/fashion-curation-apps-like-limeroad-withme-voonik-are-carving-a-business-out-of-recommending-what-to-wear/articleshow/52352645.cms ET has a very brief coverage (~150 words) out of which 100 words are quotes by the founder and investor. http://www.hindustantimes.com/business/limeroad-to-redemption-why-e-com-troubles-make-suchi-mukherjee-happy/story-sAUju0EJoWSvhCif0JAnuN.html HT is an interview of the founder which is not useful per . http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/indian-fashion-scrapbooking-site-limeroad-raises-30-million-dollar-series-c-115033100253_1.html Business Standard is a vert brief coverage about funding. http://www.livemint.com/Companies/mvuL9EUPb0SrAcpKbc8L4L/Fashion-etailer-Limeroad-enters-menswear-segment.html LiveMint is probably the only source which is somewhat better but not enough. The company has been trying to promote itself but it doesn't seem to have received enough secondary attention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPIND)

Comment: per  -- unsalvageable even if the company is notable. Check out this contribution https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Limeroad.com&type=revision&diff=744117690&oldid=743579774 diff, which restored 3500 worth of promo content, while removing the AfD template. No point to keep this garbage in article history. No prejudice to recreation as LimeRoad if notability can be proven and better RS exist (which is not likely per the current state of things). But maybe the company will become more notable in the future, who knows
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: to be sanitized or not to be, that is the question: whether 'tis nobler to accept one version over the other; to suffer the slings and arrows of sources that are only PR, repackaged PR, company announcements, company sourced interviews, mundane financial information - Or to take arms against a sea of promotion and say, Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion . Alas, to be lacking in GNG and CORPDEPTH is the true state of each version
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)