Deletion of Linda Skitka

Comment: Although true that there are no obvious awards claimed, she very specifically satisfies  #1 &ndash; her research record is quite notable. WoS shows 42 hits with citations of 168, 62, 56, etc., indicating her work has had a clear and appreciable impact on a mainstream academic field. Agree with above &ndash; unclear as to why this appeared here in AfD. Respectfully
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The above link to Google Scholar list many publications, two of them with more than 100 citations. Meets  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Explanation of  rof #1 follows: Publishing papers is not sufficient to achieve notability for academics and scientists. What counts is the impact they make on the scholarly community. In the area of academic and scientific research impact can be measured objectively by counting the citations to papers made by other independent sources. These citations are available from several places for example Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus and others List of academic databases and search engines. Statistical measures, such as the h index are applied to these findings. All these matters have been discussed extensively in the past and present academic AfD pages and
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: In addition to clearly passing   #1, service as president of the International Society for Justice Research conveys notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)