Deletion of Iwan Baan

Comment: the references in use and mentioned above show this person easily passes our notability criteria. Did the nominator even attempt to |look for references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Just in case anyone is a bit perplexed as to why this was nominated, Turqoise127 has Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive219#User:Turqoise127|a bit of a history of being |pointy and the creator of this article Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Beer_rebates|nominated one of Turqoise127's articles a few weeks ago
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: There is an in depth article in the https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/arts/design/24baan.html NYT as well as another article in http://www.archdaily.com/150393/the-indicator-iwan-baan%E2%80%A6on-photography/ Arch Daily, an interview in http://www.fastcodesign.com/1662463/meet-iwan-baan-todays-leading-architectural-photographer-slideshow Design Co and a review of his book in http://www.metropolismag.com/pov/20110801/iwan-baan-on-living-modernity Metropolis Mag. By themselves, these are sufficient to meet , but they also show that  #1 "The person is regarded as an important figure" is met: "Just five years after he took up architectural photography, Mr. Baan is “remaking the genre,”", "one of the preeminent figures documenting the built environment today" "It is this ability to see beyond the standard architecture photographic trope of glorifying built structures as paeans to man’s genius, that makes Baan’s photographs so interesting" etc. Finally, there is a EB article on him - EB is in no way "similar to the project here" and inclusion there is almost certainly an indication that they should be included here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)