Deletion of Category:Years in motoring

Comment: Motoring is a notable topic. |AFD is not cleanup. The articles could be improved, but that's not a reason for deletion. Also, the category should be proposed at , not here, though if all the articles are deleted, it could probably be speedied. Until then, the category should not have been nominated for deletion at any venue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP||WP:CFD)

Comment: Not clear how this is OR. Doesn't meet any of the deletion criteria in . As stated above, AFD is not cleanup. If something can be cleaned up, it should be cleaned up rather than deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per . Unsourced does not equate to non-notable/OR. These lists contain notable events about notable companies and milestones within the motor industry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: ? Let me provide you a different part of this essay that does not support you:, which expicitely states that the lack of reliable sources is a VALID deletion criterion.  is directed towards normal problems, especially format, grammar problems, , or minor issues with our content policies that do not justify | removing the entire article. It is not directed towards unsourced, suspicious articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:HARMFUL||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP||WP:DEADEND||WP:BATHWATER)