Deletion of Tourism in metropolitan Detroit

Comment: as failing  a travel guide. If the article is rewritten as an encyclopaedia article, with the requisite referencing, I will reconsider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: or transwiki to Wikitravel. This is exactly the type of article #TRAVEL is intended to prevent, half of it is taken up with directories listing street addresses of selected tourism-related businesses
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Everyone who is arguing for the deletion of this article needs to reread . There are clearly problems with this article but they are obviously surmountable, since many other Tourism articles of high quality exist on wikipedia. Nominating a poorly written article for deletion is not the correct way to deal with the problem.  Spend the time fixing it instead
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM)

Comment: The subject, rather than simply the tone, is patently a violation of #TRAVEL. Any possibly salvageable content should go into the main Detroit article. Even if the subject was a relevant one, there would be no real content if you deleted all the promotional and how-to language from the present article. This subject would be a fitting press release for tourist boards, but is not an encyclopedic topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I would strongly advise all contributors to this discussion to |stick to content, not contributors in their arguments. The above comments on motive are a clear assumption of |bad faith bordering on |personal attack. Comments like "they stink" are totally unacceptable in any context
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA||WP:AGF||WP:NPA)

Comment: per #TRAVEL, with no prejudice against creation of an unbiased article. Its current form is mostly copy-and-paste from other articles, so not much would be lost with deletion of this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)