Deletion of Angela Sommerhoff

Comment: This seems to have been created by someone close to the subject, and without any clear understanding of what Wikipedia is for. Of the three sources in the article, one is written by (apparently) her husband on her own website, one does not mention her at all, and the third has only minimal coverage. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/wolfratshausen/ausstellung-in-bad-toelz-goethes-farben-gegen-dunkelheiten-1.3085836 This article in the ''Süddeutsche Zeitung'' has rather more. I'm afraid that it confirms that she is not |notable by our standards: it's a review of a show in her own workshop, she has a painting in an office in Copenhagen and in a doctor's surgery – these are not grounds for inclusion here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:notable)

Comment: This article perfect shows what not to do when writing about artists; establish some false equivalency between a very minor artist and a great one by highlighting a shared interest. She's read Goethe (like Runge, Turner and Kandinsky), she's been influenced by  Nolde, Chagall, von Jawlensky and Rothko, she listens to Bach, she shows her work at at gallery that named itself after a real museum. Another popular technique is trying to establish that already as a child the subject was some sort of creative genius. It's all completely meaningless. What we (ought to) care about is mature artists with a significant body of work who have been influential themselves. This subject fails that, and every criterion in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)