Deletion of Jonathan Higgins

Comment: No reason to believe that at any point this will extend beyond a |plot summary; this character and series has been extant for many years and as yet, there are few to no  that have a ''thorough'', ''in-depth'' discussion of the character's ''real-world'' notability. If I were to remove all of the  sourced summary from this article, we wouldn't have anything left, and as our policies state, we build articles with secondary sourcing, not primary. As it is, the arguments to keep this article are based on  and the idea that if a character's name is mentioned on the internet, that he must somehow meet . I'm afraid it isn't so. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTJUSTPLOT||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG)

Comment: doing a bit of narrowing on the default http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Jonathan+Higgins%22+hillerman+magnum+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a Google News Archive search above shows plenty of RS that discuss the character. So does http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Jonathan+Higgins%22+magnum&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C38&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Google Scholar, for that matter. Not only is the nomination inaccurate and appears to not have followed , the article can be improved to include these independent secondary sources and hence is not a candidate for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Fails , no real-world context either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)