Deletion of Pie Corbett

Comment: I haven't yet checked out the sources in the article or looked for any more, but I would point out that  is not the only notability criterion, so arguments based on a lack of citations found by Google Scholar are inconclusive
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: As noted above, he is not really an academic in the traditional sense, and is known more as a children's book author and an elementary education expert. So  is not the most relevant guideline here. I think there is a good case for passing  based on the current improved state of the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Article has a number of sources, but they are not coverage ''of the subject'' per , simply offhand mentions of his work, among other persons, and not in a way that suggests a high degree of notability or importance in his field. Google Scholar records 159 hits, a solid eighty to ninety percent of which are childrens' books written by the subject; the citations that do exist are informal, ''en passant'' and not constituting dedicated coverage. By these standards I'd have to assert that the subject fails ,  and by extension . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:AUTH||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Concur with above. In this case, it seems we should really be relying on solid secondary sources (since citations and worldcat holdings may not be as directly relevant in children's lit), which do not seem to be there. Short quotes in a few newspapers and vague assertions like "has had a great deal of experience as a teacher..." are not enough. Glad to change my position if real  shows up. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)