Deletion of Iowa Film Critics Awards 2003

Comment: Iowa Film Critics per .  '''Merge''' the rest of these articles into the main one, and tag for more sourcing. Even though ostensibly an Iowa group of film critics judging mostly non-Iowa films, they have had wide enough coverage to merit inclusion. Point being, Variety (magazine) is not some local neighborhood gazette and  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:USEBYOTHERS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per , there needs to be in-depth coverage about an organization like the Iowa Film Critics Association. Apparently one of the co-founders is Jeffrey Bruner, but I cannot find any mention of him beyond him being identified as such. However, it is worth noting that ''Variety'' reported on the association's selections as seen http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117916114/?refcatid=13 here and http://weblogs.variety.com/thevote/2013/01/spielberg-nabs-elusive-critics-group-win.html here. The problem is that neither is in-depth coverage. I'm leaning toward delete, but it seems like we have quite a few similar organizations on Wikipedia whose selected winners and nominees are reported by larger publications like the aforementioned ''Variety''. Should the criteria for awards be different from organizations in general? Is it worth discussing more specific notability guidelines in this regard
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)