Deletion of Mawra Hocane

Comment: The subject is significantly covered by mainstream print and electronic media with editorial integrity in English and Urdu. The subject also performed in multiple famous dramas. It clearly passes , , and . I see here is being practised as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Significant_coverage_not_required this essay states: "some participants at AfD will argue that no matter how much coverage there is, ''it is not significant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:ENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  Fails , , and  - not having a wikipedia page does not mean that someone is not a good actor, it means that they have not yet achieved encyclopedic notability.  It may happen, but hasn't happened YET
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NACTOR||WP:ENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly does not meet , and misses on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: whilst it is  as a film actress for her, she for sure has credits for several TV serials
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I had originally thought that she would meet the , but http://tribune.com.pk/story/898115/not-one-not-two-mawra-hocane-has-signed-three-bollywood-films/ this was the only reliably published English language source that I could find that is substantially about her.  With that in mind, I can't read Urdu so http://akhbar-e-jehan.com/March2015/02-03-2015/fashion_main.asp this might be substantial and reliable; I just don't know.  If it is, that'd be the two reliable sources needed to push her past the GNG, and  would become irrelevant at that point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)