Deletion of List of Warriors characters (2nd nomination)

Comment: Series is notable, list of characters is too long to fit in series article per .  I was expecting to see a whole lot of plot summary, but as I reviewed it just now, the amount per character was quite terse and reasonable. It does not appear to be indiscriminate in any way. References to primary sources are present, which are sufficient to meet V for non-disputed facts, and because the character list is essentially the same topic as the series, we have enough documentation to show that the series is notable, and the RS'es that establish that also demonstrate notability here, per . Overall, the nomination is highly problematic, in that I don't understand what policy-based defect the nominator is asking that we resolve by deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE||WP:NEXIST)