Deletion of 2011 English cricket season

Comment: Regardless of whether or not the articles are notable, some of them have been around for years and still have not been improved beyond tables of information. Also nobody has said they are "just lists of numbers", but as they currently are (and as some of them have been for several years) they are not in compliance with . Ideally the articles would be improved so that they don't breach STATS, especially since the information is all basic info that can be obtained from other sites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: per nominator's comment, "the articles all meet the terms of otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Lugnuts, and  regarding most of these, and a whole lot of  not done on these too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: They'd (mostly) be better articles with more narrative, but I don't think they breach 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: All of these articles go by the  as it is part of the English Cricket calendar. I just find it obscured that you thought about deleting these articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: WP:NOTSTATS is about "Statistics that lack context or explanation". All of these have ''some'' context, even if they contain more stats than prose. Also, they are all the top-level tournaments in (mainly) England for domestic cricket, passing . Included in the bundle is 2013 ICC Champions Trophy, an international cricket tournament! Saying that article should be deleted for being non-notable is nosense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)