Deletion of Zerona

Comment: There are two questions to answer here: first, is this a notable topic; second, is this article so irredeemably noncompliant that we would be |better off without it. The answer to the former is: marginal. There is some discussion in the popular press, but virtually none in the specialist medical press. Most of the coverage has a strong appearance of churnalism. As a case for notability it is weak, to say the least. The answer to the latter is: absolutely. The content of the article, give or take stylistic fixes, was written entirely by one  whose username strongly suggests that he is an individual prominently associated with promoting the device
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:SPA)

Comment: per  with a dose of ; purely promotional drivel
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:TNT)