Deletion of Arias and Barcarolles

Comment: although technically meeting no. 1 of  - "subject of multiple ie. 2 or more, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." as article  lists reviews by ''Gramophone (magazine)|Gramophone'' and ''Sound & Vision (magazine)|Sound & Vision'', past consensus amongst classical album wikieditors appears to require more
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)

Comment: The criteria in ikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for  concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:NPOV||WP:NALBUM)

Comment: per  The article's COPYVIO issue has been addressed - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course. The album is notable as the premiere recording of a new version of a work by a composer of international standing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)

Comment: another notable album that now with the above reviews brought out here easily meets  to be '''kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)

Comment: per criteria 1 of . The work has several  published critical reviews, including ''The Penguin Guide to Recorded Classical Music|The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs'', Penguin Books, 1999, page 2016; ''Out (magazine)'', Volume 5, Issues 1-5, 1996, page 75; ''American Opera Singers and Their Recordings: Critical Commentaries and Discographies'', Clyde T. McCants, McFarland Press, 2004, page 93, 366; and ''Gramophone (magazine)|Gramophone'' (see https://www.gramophone.co.uk/review/bernstein-arias-and-barcarolles-etc here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)