Deletion of Allflaws

Comment: I can't find anything to show show this meets the guidelines for inclusion set out at . While there is some coverage, as shown above, hardly any of these are either in-depth or |reliable. Sorry, but this does not pass the notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RS)

Comment: After looking through everything above I don't see how this band, well more of a pseudonym really (if it is a band rather than a bunch of session musicians, who are the other members?), passes  let alone . All of the sources are nothing more than press releases or :wikt:churnalism saying he released a new album or video and http://read.uberflip.com/i/88421-issue-44-2012/35?m4= http://www.mayhemderanged.com/e_fuse1007.pdf/ these "reviews" don't read as in-depth critical prose. https://bbmlive.com/allflaws-music-video-gets-banned-from-youtube/ The BBM website is rather strange, if you go out of the article and onto the rest of the website I'm left with the impression that it is a glorified version of Classified advertising. If banning the video was notorious why is it only on this website? Finally https://www.allmusic.com/search/artists/Allflaws no Allmusic listing page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: The bulk of the links posted above are album release blurbs, and many amount to what's likely a lightly padded press release at best. However, this writeup http://www.mayhemderanged.com/e_fuse1007.pdf/ and this article https://bbmlive.com/allflaws-music-video-gets-banned-from-youtube/ both seem to constitute independent and significant coverage of the band. I've seen shorter pieces than either pass for , and I can't find reason to think either source is unreliable. BBM is one of Sydney's free weeklies, and Fuse_(magazine)|Fuse has substantial history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)