Deletion of VIRUS (Cyber Fools) (film)

Comment: as being |TOO SOON.  When screened and ''IF'' receiving the requisite sourcing, it can be |resurrected. If the author wishes it returned to him in a |DRAFTSPACE as we wait, I'd say okay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYF||WP:REFUND||WP:DRAFT)

Comment: While not a hoax, this does appear to be a non-notable independent film. Per  all films must be the focus of independent and reliable sources such as newspaper articles or reviews in places like Twitch Film or http://wegotthiscovered.com/ We Got This Covered. Also, just appearing at a film festival is not something that would show notability. It's generally accepted that a film will premiere somewhere and while showing at a festival will make it more likely that there will be coverage, it is not a guarantee regardless of the film festival's notability. Also, notability is not automatically inherited by the film festival itself being notable. () When the film screens and ''if'' it receives enough coverage to pass notability guidelines this could be created, but not before then. I suppose that a copy of this could be sent to AfC, but this would need to be entirely re-written to remove the promotional tones, unsourced claims, and general casual tone of the article. In other words, there's really nothing to salvage here and this would probably benefit more from having a clean start once the film releases and gains the required coverage. On a side note, the critical reception section is supposed to be used for critics' reviews of the film - not an unsourced Q&A about the reasons for creating the film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:NOTINHERITED)