Deletion of Religious conversions in Pakistan

Comment: The article clearly passes  and . As for the nominator's rationale that it should be part of two already existing articles, conversions and minorities are not the same. However, I do feel that ''Forced Conversions ...'' would be a more suitable title, but that can be handled at a later stage. As for neutrality, NPOV related issues can be fixed, they don't warrant a deletion discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: It's an  , the content of which can be addressed elsewhere in other articles already mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACK||WP:CFORK)

Comment: and apply |TNT per nominator & arguments presented by others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: as a page that easily meets , or redirect at best. As noted above, the vast majority of the content is |a collection of news headlines and does not do anything more than relaying what should have been dealt with in the existing articles concerning Hinduism in Pakistan, Minorities in Pakistan or Freedom of religion in Pakistan. As such, its existence outlives its utility, making it redundant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This page (just like the version deleted as attack page earlier) involves violation of NPOV,  and misrepresents sources. There is consensus to create a Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2020_June_9#Forced_conversion_to_Islam_in_Pakistan DRV held here and the draft is already ready at Draft:Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan. But this article is misleading and violates  as well since it failed to give any credit to my draft from where it copied lots of content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: Coverage in human rights sources and high-circulation newspaper sources such as ''The New York Times''https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/04/world/asia/pakistan-hindu-conversion.html. I don't see a point in merging this to a general article about religious minorities in Pakistan, the scope and depth of this topic justifies a . {{tq|The page seems to exist primarily to disparage Islam in Pakistan}}: this deletion rationale in particular is weird and could be said for any article that contains information that can be perceived as negative towards Islam or Muslim communities, even articles such as this that detail human rights issues.  — Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SUBARTICLE||WP:NOTCENSORED)