Deletion of Yoü and I

Comment: Doesn't meet the normal criteria established by , and there is nothing exceptional enough to treat it as an exception case.&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: and merge content to Born This Way), this is a classic case of ''creation before achievement''. People have created the article because they ''think'' the song will become notable. Several live performances alone are NOT criteria for notability. Per  it clearly states thats songs are only notable upon charting and/or receiving independent coverage. They only receive an indepedent article if there is enough verifiable info for a reasonably detailed article. It is the latter stipulation (about reasonably detailed article) which is covered by  however the crux and creation of the article itself is covered by . I'm fed up of reading discussions where people have misunderstood the two policies and seem to believe that the notability of an artist or of a particular peformance of the song makes the song itself notable. This is simply not a case. An article of this size, with its considerable lack of detail is simply not required. Remember articles are creater ''after'' notability has been established not in ''ancitipation'' of notability. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:GNG||WP:NSONGS)

Comment: This does not even meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject has had plenty of independent coverage. It passes  so I don't see why it won't pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSONGS)

Comment: This is a question for all the people who say that this song fails , could you please explain WHY you think it fails the policy.  Some people have said that we should wait until the song has been released as a single.  I assume those folks are talking about Lady Gaga releasing it because it has already been released as a single by Haley Reinhart http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/you-i-american-idol-performance/id435831241.  Even if we treat the song as unreleased, the policy states ''"Unreleased material... are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources."''  This song has been covered in articles in Billboard (magazine)|Billboard http://www.billboard.com/column/viralvideos/lady-gaga-unveils-new-rock-song-you-and-1004101195.story#/column/viralvideos/lady-gaga-unveils-new-rock-song-you-and-1004101195.story, Los Angeles Times http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2010/07/lady-gaga-you-and-i-today-show-video.html, New York Post http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/ny_hearts_lady_gaga_HLRlzkVTxTgR1hMV8abQFK, Entertainment Weekly http://music-mix.ew.com/2010/06/28/lady-gaga-new-song-you-and-i/, USA Today http://content.usatoday.com/communities/idolchatter/post/2011/05/haley-reinhart-covers-an-unreleased-lady-gaga-song/1 and 6 MTV articles.  (And those are just the articles that are specifically about the song, I didn't include ones that just mention it).  The policy goes on to state: ''"Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article"''.  The current article on this song is approximately 660 words long.  So, if that's not a long enough article and that's not enough RS refs, could someone please state how long an article needs to be and just how many articles need to be written about a song, because the  policy page fails to address that. So, bottom line, I am stating that I believe this *does* pass  and I've laid out my reasoning.  If you believe that it does not pass , then I don't think it's sufficient to simply say so, I think you need to say WHY you think it doesn't pass
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:NSONGS||WP:NSONGS||WP:NSONGS)

Comment: Doesn't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)