Deletion of List of G rated films (2nd nomination)

Comment: These are notable films and, at least to many movie-goers in the United States, MPAA ratings are highly relevant and important characteristics of these films. This is an |appropriate topic for a stand-alone list.  I'll note, for example, that List of NC-17 rated films has citations, an explanatory lede, and has been in existence and avoided AfD nomination for many years, generally demonstrating that it's possible for this type of list to meet minimum Wikipedia guidelines. The fact that MPAA ratings are specific to the United States is a reason that in this case a list may be preferable to a category. (U.S. readers can refer to the list, while non-U.S. can easily ignore it.)  I disagree with the claim that the list is unmaintainable--there are probably an average of two or three new G-rated films a month, and many Wikipedia lists keep up with those sorts of updates. The list does need to be improved, but an editor has done a lot of work and should be encouraged to add references, drop pre-MPAA films, and make other changes to fully meet Wikipedia guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: as unmaintainable and |unencyclopedic. Categorization will work better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per   and a pointless category duplication
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)