Deletion of Adzerk

Comment: The sources are thin and many of them do not count towards establishing notability per . For example, this http://observer.com/2013/03/reddit-adopts-new-ad-system-adzerk-allowing-users-to-up-and-downvote-ads/ observer source doesn't count towards notability per  as it is a brief mention in context of Reddit. Simply because Reddit is using their service doesn't make it notable. TechCrunch published literally every small news in the tech world, using it for notability would lead to Wikipedia becoming a directory (which goes against ). The quality of the sources is pretty bad. I mean this https://techcrunch.com/2013/05/30/how-adzerk-made-it-big-by-hitching-their-wagon-to-reddit/ TechCrunch article used an employee as a story source and this cannot establish notability per . None of the other sources are good enough and this seriously doesn't merit keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:INHERITORG||WP:NOTDIR||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: per ; the article exists to promote the business. In addition, sources offered above and in the article are not convincing; they are routine. This is an unremarkable SaaS startup going about its business. The coverage is routine, of funding, customers and partnerships, and minor awards, such as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)