Deletion of Rich La Bonté

Comment: Ouch. I was all ready to agree with LFOD, but upon second inspection I think Falcon has the right idea. Article was created almost three years ago, and has seen no improvement. I'll need to see third-party |reliable sourcing to change my !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: HidariMigi is correct: the Canadian http://www.xtra.ca/public/viewstory.aspx?AFF_TYPE=2&STORY_ID=2388&PUB_TEMPLATE_ID=2 Richard Labonte appears to be a different person. The subject of this article is not notable per : all the books are self-published, no reviews of his work that I could find and no coverage by independent wp:rs|reliable sources either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Count not locate any |reliable sources to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: All of his novels were self-published, and while some of his works were part of a compendium, I see no reliable, nontrivial third-party coverage.  The articles were created by a |SPA
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)