Deletion of Tree-cover ratio of graphs:asymptotes and areas

Comment: I agree with the nominator that |Wikipedia is not for promotion of newly-published research, even though one could argue that as published research it is different than 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:OR)

Comment: per o original research. {{ping|Winterpaulaug}} the statement that a single paper is not a sufficient source is in that policy, in the section "Using sources": "''If no reliable Wikipedia:Third-party sources|third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.''" There is more explanation at hird-party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:T)

Comment: Publicity write-up for a non-notable uncited recent paper. Fails . Also note that the paper in question did '''not''' appear in ''Advances in Mathematics'', but in a rather dubious and non-indexed Macedonia-based journal with a similar name (http://www.research-publication.com/index.php/about-research-publication/advances-in-mathematics-scientific-journal/content/vol-3-no-1-2-2014). -- Special:Contributions/101.117.57.200|101.117.57.200
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)