Deletion of Fishing Party (Scotland) (3rd nomination)

Comment: Nothing has changed since the last AFD: with eight independent reliable sources providing significant coverage this clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is well written with  sources and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: passes .  We really need to have a centralised discussion about the notability of political parties, and maybe think about creating a standalone guideline to reduce ambiguities in deletion discussions. How much coverage is significant coverage? How much weight do we give to electoral success (or lack of it)? I think creating a rule of thumb to use in these sorts of discussions would be preferable to the current situation, where standards are applied differently from week to week and arguments often consist of "that article was deleted/kept, so this one must be too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)