Deletion of Postbiological evolution

Comment: The article is completely a  essay with  and  claims. I realize the editor put a lot of work into the article, but it cannot be salvaged because is pseudoscience.  I don't see any experimental science supporting the material contained in the article. It is an ideologically driven article and not a science article. Frankly, it reads like science fiction and not an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The concept is likely notable, but the article has only two inline references, both to books and not citing page numbers, so effectively nothing it in can be easily verified. As such, it may well be , hence, given the concerns raised,  applies - but the lead could be kept, I think
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:TNT)

Comment: Nothing suggests that this kind of speculation merits more than a mention in some other article, like Fermi paradox, and the text is so |OR-ful and |essay-like that merging, even selectively, would be a bad idea. The Special:PermaLink/356793374#Implications of PBCs in Astrobiology|original article referred to above is still bad, taking a third-hand understanding of Landauer's principle as deep cosmological truth. (It also kicks off with {{tq|The dictionary definition of Evolution is any process of formation, growth or development.}} This isn't an encyclopedia article; it's a school report that somebody put off until the last minute
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:ESSAY)