Deletion of Howard Jachter

Comment: Would any of his books pass ? It doesn't appear that they would. Simply writing books does not allow someone to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: nbsp; I can't verify the claims of the nomination, which amounted to a  anyway.&nbsp; I non-randomly sampled a couple of the sources in the article, and both were in-depth and showed long-term attention to the topic from the world at large.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE)

Comment: His work as an author and his subject-matter expertise in Jewish Law meet the notability standard, based on sources already in the article and additional references available using a simple Internet search. As has been the sad pattern in the torrent of AfDs from this nominator, there seems to be no compliance with the basic requirements of , an essential guideline intended to avoid the worst abuses of deletionism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Notability is when books are written about subjects, not when subjects write books. Unless those books are notable enough to pass , which is not the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Unable to find sufficient independent coverage to meet |GNG or |ANYBIO. Having written several books does not satisfy |AUTHOR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: between his books, writings online and other work there is enough to pass  at a bare minimum
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)