Deletion of Girl meets ghost

Comment: The standards for notability being proposed for this non-award-winning, non-best-selling children's book are the lowest that I've seen in any deletion discussion. This book '''does not''' in any way, shape, or form pass the . https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/lauren-barnholdt/girl-meets-ghost/ Kirkus Reviews is a blog. http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-4424-4246-7 Publishers Weekly is a glorified blog. The ''School Library Journal'' "reviews" thousands of children's books each year, more than likely doing little more than rephrasing the blurb on the back of the book. The author of the "Library Media Connection" review lists her occupation as "Educational Materials Reviewer" – she is paid (gosh, it couldn't be by a publishing company?) to review books. I'm an nclusionism|"inclusionist", but this is ridiculous. |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:I||WP:NOTPLOT)