Deletion of Laura Bryna

Comment: In order to meet Wikipedia's standards for |verifiability and |notability, the article in question ''must actually document'' that the criterion is true. It is not enough to make vague claims in the article or assert an individual's importance on a talk page or AfD page – ''the article itself must document notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: hardly notable per  &ndash; most of the Ghits are for commercial sites; the article is a shameful http://www.allmusic.com/artist/laura-bryna-p1010536/biography copyright http://www.myspace.com/laurabrynafanclub violation to boot. I'm amazed such spam found its way onto allmusic too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Once you remove the copyright violation, there's nothing much worthy of saving. Notability is not established through |significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. As far as the music, neither the album or any singles charted. I think the tour and the appearance on ''Country Roads'' would be notable, but at this point, it doesn't appear verifiable. All in all, in order to meet Wikipedia's standards for |verifiability and |notability, the article in question ''must actually document'' that the criterion is true. It is not enough to make vague claims in the article or assert an individual's importance on a talk page or AfD page – ''the article itself must document notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: if this promotional not notable article is kept - I am going to hack all the not notable uncited promo content out of it until it will barely exist anyways. She never had a hit of any description, the GNG, our lowest possible guideline to notability, if you are almost passing the  you are not notable at all - the GNG is three citations with your name in it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The ''Patriot Ledger'' source is basically a "local chick does good come hear her sing" promo. The lowellsun.com archives do not offer a full copy of the newspaper article, so it's not clear what content it may support in the Laura Bryna article. The ''New York Magazine'' source is a four question interview essentially about Bryna's fashion choices. Nothing in the NYMag article supports notability. While determination of viability is subjective, the ''Patriot Ledger'' article may pass. Yet overall, this coverage does not meet the general notability guidelines, as significant. The subject may be notable through touring, but in order to meet Wikipedia's standards for |verifiability and |notability, the article in question ''must actually document'' that the criterion is true. It is not enough to make vague claims in the article or assert an individual's importance on a talk page or AfD page – ''the article itself must document notability''. At this point, the documentation simply isn't there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)