Deletion of Kamala Harris citizenship conspiracy theories

Comment: Obviously meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: since this page was created on 14 August, it has had an average of 1,000 page views per day, with a peak over 4,000 and gradually trailing off. The threshold we commonly use in |redirects for discussion for determining if a title is useful as a search term is one or two daily page views. This title is ''clearly useful as a search term''; arguments to the contrary are wrong by three order of magnitude|orders of magnitude, and I'll also remind everyone that |notability is not temporary. The only really valid discussion here is whether this should be a standalone article, or to which article this title should redirect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:RFD||WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: with no redirect as this is not a likely search term. The basis of the article is Eastman's debunked op-ed in Newsweek that received almost no significant support, even by consevative legal scholars. No serious legal pursuit of the claims have been made in the courts. As such, giving the idea this amount of attention is |undue weight to a fringe viewpoint. As to notability, there were several sources devoted to debunking, but the coverage was so brief that  applies here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:NOTNEWS)