Deletion of Golden Films

Comment: per meeting  and improve this sad stub article about a company which has won multiple industry awards (yes, some minor),http://goldenfilmsmedia.com/awards.htmlhttp://goldenfilmsmedia.com/about.html as diligent searches find the accompanying media coverage due to those awards.https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Golden+Films%22&tbm=nwshttps://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Golden+Films%22+site:news.google.com/newspapers&source=newspapershttps://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Golden+Films%22https://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Golden+Films%22  Tone and sourcing of an arguably notable topic is a matter for editorial attention, not deletion.  As with similar articles, it is expected that sources would write about the product of a production/distribution company.  Per guideline: {{tq|"'A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. '''If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability'''."}}  My emboldening as  is not a requirement of  (intentional redlink to underscore that it is not a mandate).  |Multiple sources are available. Time to |address issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:SUBSTANTIAL||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NEXIST||WP:HANDLE)