Deletion of Amanullah Nezami (2nd nomination)

Comment: The subject meets  per a review of |available sources: http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/I-Come-from-Afghanistan-but-Heart-Lies-in-India-Says-Millionaire-Bollywood-Fan/2016/02/01/article3255573.ece, http://thepashtuntimes.com/afghan-bollywood-fan-spent-millions-to-have-largest-collection-of-hindi-movies/, https://www.khaama.com/afghan-bollywood-fan-spent-millions-to-have-largest-collection-of-hindi-movies-0062, http://www.newindianexpress.com/thesundaystandard/Lights-Camera-Action-An-Afghan%E2%80%99s-Dil-Hai-Hindustani/2016/01/31/article3253355.ece, http://www.kabultribune.com/index.php/2016/02/01/afghan-bollywood-fan-spent-millions-to-have-largest-collection-of-hindi-movies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: now, as I've reconsidered since the last AFD. That this person has coverage for being a collector, fine... as  tells us notability is through coverage.  And it really does not matter that it has not received a lot of attention since the last AFD.  ,  is the impetus and the nom's sense of  is not a deletion policy. Succinctly, it is a suitable well-sourced stub article and there is no policy or guideline mandate that it cannot simply remain one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:WIP||WP:PRESERVE||WP:IMPATIENT)