Deletion of Zuckerman's Famous Pig

Comment: article fails to establish notability, as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I'm sorry, but the sources provided do ''not'' establish independent notability for the song. The http://books.google.com/books?id=sc0tAAAAMAAJ&q=zuckerman's+famous+pig&pgis=1 first source mentions the phrase as part of the plot of the book ''Charlotte's Web'' for what appears to be an explication of Kubler-Ross's five stages of grief. It does not provide any coverage of the song as it draws its reference from the phrase's appearance in the novel, not the song's existence in the film. The http://books.google.com/books?id=CctHAAAAMAAJ&q=zuckerman's&pgis=1 second source is nothing but a track listing. Does not cover the song in any substantive fashion.  The http://books.google.com/books?id=X4Y5NIyCikIC&q=zuckerman's&pgis=1 third source merely mentions that the Brady Kids recorded it and does not discuss the song in a substantive fashion. The http://books.google.com/books?id=dP4bYLxlPvoC&pg=PP6&vq=zuckerman's&source=gbs_search_r&cad=1_1 fourth source is a dedication of a novel (which is also dedicated to "Hayao, Jesus, Akira" and the men who shaped the author and the woman who said the author was her favorite. No discussion of the song at all and no evidence that it is a reference to the song and not the phrase from the novel. Per |notability guidelines notability is established by "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Single-sentence mentions are not significant coverage, as also established by notability guidelines: "The 360-page book by Sobel and the 528-page book by Black on IBM are plainly non-trivial. The one sentence mention by Walker of the band Three Blind Mice in a biography of Bill Clinton (Martin Walker (1992-01-06). "Tough love child of Kennedy", The Guardian.) is plainly trivial." Four plainly trivial mentions, two of which are likely not about the song at all, do not and ''cannot'' establish notability. Find sources that are about the song in a significant manner
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails the GNG.  Also would arguably fail the proposed , though it would be pretty close
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: I have added a variety of sources to the article and cleaned it up.  The title is clearly notable in several respects and so, per , deletion is not appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)