Deletion of Aer Lingus Flight 328

Comment: Despite being an early hull loss for this type of aircraft, it appears to fail , especially WP:PERSISTENCE.  I found two wire service articles at the time of the crash.  A later article mentions the crash in a list of incidents related to turboprop safety.  https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141105004611/http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/6-1987%20EI-BEM.pdf|The official accident report had three recommendations, but I haven't found evidence they came to anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: I found significant coverage in newspaper archives on 1 February 1986, but per  there is no enduring coverage beyond an immediate recounting of the event, no analysis. If enduring coverage is found or the article is otherwise kept, ping me and I will add these sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: AIRCRASH is but an essay, and this fairly small (or medium-small) civil aircraft (36 seats, 12,292 kg MTOW) is in the grey zone of the essay. Per https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19860131-1 ASN this was indeed "Damaged beyond repair", but also that "The cockpit and passenger cabin were relatively undamaged and there was no fire". What is lacking here - is , and given the circumstances of the crash it seems likely to believe that it simply isn't there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)