Deletion of List of Spanish flu cases

Comment: The list passes  – see the https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/ten-famous-people-who-survived-1918-flu-180965336/ Smithsonian, for example.  Information about that pandemic was suppressed at the time in many countries because of the Fisrt World War but now, |Wikipedia is not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:CENSOR)

Comment: It's too large.... It's too small... Nom makes no sense and as no valid reason has been presented for deletion (or at least not one that makes sense) it must be kept. That's not even counting the  in the nom - I fail to see what the 1904 Olympics or cricket players have anything to do with this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: claiming that the article is a mess is not an argument for deletion. This is a  nom due to a spillover from a rticles for deletion/List of people with coronavirus disease 2019|failed attempt to delete List of people with coronavirus disease 2019
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY||WP:A)

Comment: I don't see that the list falls under ; it's not indiscriminate; there are no BLP issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)