Deletion of John Waterhouse (headmaster)

Comment: I see no assertion of notability, the references cited all have other people as their subject.  requires "significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject." with "Sources, defined on Wikipedia as Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|secondary sources...", there is nothing like a secondary source with John Waterhouse as it's subject, he's not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: That is not a neutral point of view & he does not pass  there are hundreds of headmasters all around australia. We dont need an article for every headmaster that has ever been
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I have seen no precedent of inherent notability for high school principals or headmaster, even if they were the first one for a school. There is nothing wrong with people nominating articles about headmasters for deletion, and there is nothing " highly disruptive" about doing so. The refs neither prove |notability nor satisfy . Ref 1 is not about the subject of this article and only says "John Waterhouse deputized for him at Sydney" Ref 2 and Ref 3 are about his son. Notability does not percolate back to ancestors. Ref 2 makes bare passing reference of John Waterhouse. Ref 3 has some brief info about John Waterhouse, which it says came from bio notes "contributed by the Waterhouse family" indicating a lack of reliable and independent information. As a bio article, it is unencyclopedic, lacking even his years of birth and death.  Reliable and independent secondary sources are needed to support the several assertions  made here in support of his notability. I strongly object to making Wikipedia a directory of everyone who served as high school principals, unless their contributions were such as to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Being the headmaster of a school does not make you notable, lets not get sidetracked from that point. He fails , he is not the subject of any third-party source. The article lacks any serious . Stop trying to create a walled garden for Newington College, and start writing an encyclopedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)