Deletion of Leninist–Trotskyist Tendency (2nd nomination)

Comment: Due to failure to satisfy . Splinter parties must satisfy the applicable notability criterion. Liking articles about them, or observing that they exist (or once existed)  is not an effective counterargument to lack of notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that ever existed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: WP:ITEXISTS is a poor argument for retaining an article (Carrite & DGG). If it is considered desirable to give comprehensive coverage of the political tradition, then splinter-parties too obscure to legitimately rate an article of their own can be covered via a list-article (oh look -- List of Trotskyist internationals already exists) or overview-article on the tradition as a whole, as is standard practice on Wikipedia (Mia-etol & DGG). Such special pleadings are a ''ruddy awful'' reason to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)