Deletion of Frank LaGrotta

Comment: per , which states that elected state-level officials are inherently notable.  I'd support the addition of some information about his record of legislative accomplishments (if any) to provide appropriate weight, but deletion isn't going to help anything
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: tag, and expand. There is plenty of material that can be used to expand the article. As it stands it is unbalanced and in violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: meets basic criteria of , negative information is sourced meeting . Undue weight is an issue for editing and talk pages, not a rationale for deletion. When the negative information amounts to two complete sentences, "undue weight" is hard to swallow anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP)

Comment: Being "off balance" is not a valid reason for deletion, and I don't see any POV issue here in any case. He was a state official, which easily satisfies . What next? Should we delete Richard Nixon because of all that Watergate business
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)