Deletion of Doc Love

Comment: Remember, folks, |AFD is not cleanup. The article clearly needs work, but that doesn't mean it should be deleted. We need to look at notability. Withholding my !vote until I have time to determine that, but please, don't vote delete just because the article needs cleanup. I'm also satisfied that the limited sourcing proves that, at the very least, he exists and the article is not a hoax. Now,  is not a reason to keep, but I feel the concerns that this is a hoax are unfounded
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP||WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: As I still have been unable to find significant notable coverage in reliable sources and none has been provided by other editors. That is why it should be deleted, not because it is poorly written. If consensus is that Doc Love meets , it should be kept regardless of the current state of the article, which myself and others have attempted to improve. I just don't think he's notable. I stand by my statement that {{ping|Johnpacklambert}}'s concerns about a hoax are unfounded. But  is not a reason to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ITEXISTS)