Deletion of DGtal (software library)

Comment: The article lacks enough reliable independent sources to pass . The article is also very promotional in nature, lauding the company's offerings but not demonstrating notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It may be useful for anyone who wishes to improve this article to review other Wikipedia pages on scientific and mathematical software. For example, PyMC3 demonstrates the |notability of its subject matter by citing peer-reviewed research that made use of the PyMC libraries, and also by citing textbooks that use them as standard tools. If the software's creators publish an article in a peer-reviewed journal introducing their work, and that article becomes highly cited, then that's a good sign. Coverage in the science/tech press can also be helpful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)