Deletion of List of fixed-wing aircraft without flaps

Comment: It wasn't nominated for AfD because it is incomplete, but because it is an inherently non-encyclopedic list. Please don't http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_fixed-wing_aircraft_without_flaps&action=historysubmit&diff=319136438&oldid=319131699 remove the AfD template from the article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_fixed-wing_aircraft_without_flaps&action=historysubmit&diff=319137647&oldid=319137348 again, As Per  you are free to improve the article over the next seven days, but the matter of whether the article is retained or deleted is determined by consensus here on this page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: I cannot find any evidence from |reliable sources that these criteria are used to group or classify aircraft, doing so for a Wikipedia article in my opinion constitutes #OR|original thought. A Google search of "fixed-wing aircraft without flaps" gets no non-Wikipedia related hits (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&hs=PRk&q=%22fixed-wing+aircraft+without+flaps%22&btnG=Search&meta=), even given that there are many other possible ways to express the meaning of the phrase, it is indicative of the lack of coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: Nominator claims: ''"There are many thousands of fixed-wing aircraft that do not have flaps"''.  Are there?  This disturbs me.  We don't allow contributors to insert material based on .  And we don't let contributors excise material based on .  Our nominator may be some kind of aeronautical engineer.  That would be irrelevant.  Unlike, say, the Citizendium, or Google's Knol,  contributors here who are real world experts aren't allowed to insert material based on their real-world professional opinions.  They have to cite , just like the rest of us.  So, returning to nominator's claim: ''"There are many thousands of fixed-wing aircraft that do not have flaps..."'' perhaps our nominator could substantiate this claim?  No offense, but without substantion for this claim it looks alarming like editorializing to me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS)