Deletion of Constituency MR-1

Comment: Those arguing to keep these articles need to demonstrate that they meet the |general notability guideline or some subject-specific notability criterion.  As far as I am aware (someone please correct me if, as is quite possible, I've missed it), there is no specific notability criteria that applies to electoral constituencies.  That being so, they are only notable if they meet the general criterion of ''significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject''.  I sure can't find any.  Even the examples of 'improved' pages only reference primary sources (electoral commissions etc giving results).  It's hard to imagine why local constituencies would receive significant coverage in the , but perhaps there is some category of literature that I'm not aware of that discusses these?  I'll also ask around editors who've worked on eg the Scottish constituencies about notability in this area
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: see  if you don't know what I mean.  These are ordinary legislative constituencies comparable to Pennsylvania House of Representatives, District 14 (Pennsylvania, USA) or Electoral district of Lockyer (Queensland, Australia), so they're notable, but the articles are so short as to be completely useless.  Worse, they make searching more difficult: if you're trying to find online information about their subjects, you'll run into tons of Wikipedia mirrors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)