Deletion of Udita fractional operator

Comment: In mathematics, physics or anyother science subject or even outside science, it has enough evidence that whoever introduce a new concept will get credits for it. We have heard about Newton's law, Hadamard operator, Riemann integral or Einstein's convention and things like that. This is because, there should be a name to refer to this special case. So I do not think there is any conflict with  here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: mere mentions in textbooks probably would not be enough for |notability, but discussions or homework questions would be |significant coverage.  Has anyone checked the extensiveness of mentions of the functions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per . I get zero hits for the title in Google books, Google scholar, and MathSciNet. Wikipedia should not be in the business of promoting new theories, it should follow the recognition that those theories get in the academic community. In this case, no such recognition means no article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)