Deletion of Agricultural Foundation of California State University, Fresno

Comment: per nom. Fails  for non-profit organizations as |reliably sourced citations have not been provided and as per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CLUB||WP:RS)

Comment: responding to Gregbard: Yes, they are student governments and they have elections, but those elections do not receive notability outside of the campus itself. As noted above, some of the foundations DO receive wider coverage; those that satisfy  should stay. The fact that some such foundations are notable does not mean they all are. According to Auxiliary Organizations Association there are 90 such support organizations for the CSU system; are you seriously arguing that all 90 of them deserve articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: responding to Dwalls: what you say certainly amounts to notability for those particular foundations. I remember reading about the Sarah Palin speech controversy, although I didn't realize it was the CSU Stanislaus FOUNDATION that was involved; most of the coverage made it sound like it was the university itself. (That story should be covered at California State University, Stanislaus but I see it isn't mentioned there.) In any case, the Stanislaus foundation is not included in this delete request. This is not a proposal to delete ALL such organizations, only the ones that don't satisfy . So you can go ahead and add the information to the Stanislaus article, it is safe. The sources you mention sound like adequate coverage about the Sonoma foundation, and if you add them, I will withdraw my delete nomination for that foundation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)