Deletion of Mawlana As-Sayed Shaykh Nurjan Mirahmadi

Comment: Based on social media posts, the subject of the article appears to be a real person who exists. Beyond that, nothing can be reliably or verifiably established by even a single acceptable source. Were it not for the obvious edit warring on the part of the article's creator, this would have been a great candidate for speedy deletion. This article is an obvious  violation in regard to yet another non-notable Muslim religious figure whose fans are trying to exploit Wikipedia as a free advertising banner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: Clear vanity page with no reference to .  The SPA argument for keeping seems to be a mere mixture of , and .  does not apply as removing the non-sourced material to comply with  would not leave even a stub that could be further improved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:THEYDONTLIKEIT||WP:VALINFO||WP:INSPECTOR||WP:BLP)

Comment: Wikipedia |is not a means of promotion. Being obviously written by a devotee, the article fails to offer a neutral and objective point of view on its subject; while lack of |reliable sources makes it impossible to improve it. As it stands, the article thus carries little to none encyclopaedic value. Hence, Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:RS)

Comment: no significant biographical coverage in independent reliable sources. The aim of the |notability guideline is to ensure that enough content can be written and sourced reliably. An interview like posted above does not fulfil the criterion of "significant coverage", because it hardly gives any biographical information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)