Deletion of Faithless electors in the United States presidential election, 2016

Comment: to Hamilton Electors per . We don't title articles about a group with the name the group's enemies use to smear them. "Faithless" is obviously a pejorative, and is prejudiced in the controversy involved. With any other group we would name the article with the name the group uses for themselves, except possibly when there is some other name that is universally more common. The awkward mouthful "Faithless electors in the United States presidential election, 2016" is not a common term, whereas Hamilton Electors is in wide use, per article naming convention. The traditional term Faithless elector also fails to encompass electors in the 2016 election who have taken action other than changing their vote, such as resignation, public commentary, or seeking intelligence briefings on the email hacking. Hamilton Elector encompasses all electors in this general category
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:POVTITLE)

Comment: Easily meets , even if you think the coverage is "speculative" or you otherwise |don't like how the media is handling this issue. The faithless votes have now been cast, so the article itself is not "speculative
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: There is plenty of  to make this article pass . Any partisan material can be edited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: because page is clearly |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly meets the  portion of the GNG, and as per Gerhardvalentin the topic "will continue to be of lasting historical interest in the coming decades
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Regardless of one's opinions on the election, this is a subject that passes  and  to the point of hilarity, and there will be snowball fights on the Styx before this is a legitimate subject for deletion. (As a footnote, 'faithless elector' is not a perjorative against the electors in question, it is ''the actual term used'' to describe 'not voting for the candidate the electoral votes are supposed to go to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)