Deletion of Nina Fallenbaum

Comment: Per  and . I have found and added sources, including from the ''Guardian'', ''Huffpost'', and ''NBCBayArea'', that quote Ichikawa for her expert opinion, based on her current role as the Executive Director of the Berkeley Food Institute. I also found two sources related to her high school activism (''SFGate'' and the ''Berkeley High Jacket'') that explore this in-depth. I also added an alumni association profile reference that offers biographical detail that hasn't yet been incorporated into the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:BASIC)

Comment: I don't interpret the ''Guardian'', ''Huffpost'', ''NBCBayArea'', ''New York Times'' pieces as covering or about Ichikawa, but instead just Ichikawa providing quotes in her capacity as Executive Director of Berkeley Food Institute for the actual subjects of respective pieces. I interpret  meaning of significant coverage as more than providing quotes.  If you look at footnote7 of , I think these quotes can be seen as somewhat trivial to Ishikawa.  "Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail." The subject is not an academic, but I think the rationale behind the notability standard of  could apply - "A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC||WP:PROF)

Comment: I have revised the introduction of the CUESA reference, replaced the broken reference noted in the nom, added a reference from ''Prevention'' magazine that quotes Ichikawa as an expert, and added more support for the part of the lead that describes Ichikawa as an 'agricultural activist.' Without counting CUESA, even though it is published in ''KQED'', there are now six independent and reliable sources quoting Ichikawa as an expert, which in field like food policy, seems to help support  notability, but also  notability, as noted above. The ''San Francisco Chronicle'', ''SFGate'', and ''Eater'' also take note of Ichikawa's personal and family history, which add depth to the article and support her notability as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BASIC)