Deletion of London Steverson (2nd nomination)

Comment: I agree with the nominator, no significant coverage. The sourcing is very thin as far as published / neutral / non-self-published articles. For example, one reference is a http://archives.law.virginia.edu/dengrove/sketch/7211 courtroom sketch. The bulk of the article seems to have been copied from subject's own blog, which apparently copied the previously deleted wikipedia article. There's a claim on the talk page that some of the material comes from an un-linked USCG or Social Security Admin bio, but if those biographies exist they may have been written by the article subject anyway. This article feels like a COI / auto-bio or vanity spam, and initially claimed his firing was a retirement. His blog and self-published books don't appear to meet requirements of uthor. The Coast Guard Academy material is adequately covered in the other articles, but he does not oldier criteria either. Some of these concerns were raised at Draft talk:London Eugene Livingston Steverson, but that talk page was not moved to main during the AFC process. This article should have went to  first
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:S||WP:DRV)