Deletion of Lord Abbett

Comment: I found these refs. http://www.morganstanley.com/wealth/investmentsolutions/pdfs/fs/lock-c.pdf, http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=991882, http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/index.ssf/2012/10/lord_abbett_co_llc_appoints_9.html and http://www.nj.com/jjournal-news/index.ssf/2014/10/lord_abbett_investment_firm_na.html, I would say that sufficient coverage to meet . While the page does need work, page content doesn't determine notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic of the article is notable and there are ample reliable and verifiable sources available to show that, which should be better integrated into the article as well as addressing issues of tone. The issues with the article should be addressed but notability is established. I agree that it appears that  was not complied with and that a cursory search would have demonstrated notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)