Deletion of Reds–Cardinals rivalry

Comment: per  and . One pennant race does not make a WP-notable rivalry, and the WSJ article is the only source arguing for the existence of a rivalry (and even then, it seems to be arguing that a rivalry ''might'' be developing more than anything).  Might be okay if there were more sources on the rivalry itself, particularly prior to 2010, but I'm not seeing that right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: I am not seeing any compelling argument for this article, short of the one article this year in a relationship that dates well over a century.  There is a great deal of referencing, but this is in support of what appears to be |making an argument to support the contention of the rivalry.  I agree with the nominator citing Synth, Recentism, and (for all intents and purposes) one source.  I applaud the attempt at the article, but it simply doesn't belong here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)