Deletion of Mark Striegl

Comment: please ''carefully'' assess the above arguments against actual ''policy''; much of what is being argued are not grounds for deletion and reek of IDONTLIKEIT, , anti-, etc. AfD is not cleanup
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:NPOSSIBLE)

Comment: With no top tier fights he clearly doesn't meet .  I would say the references in the article do not meet  since I would consider them routine sports coverage (reporting on upcoming events and results).  The only reference that doesn't qualify is somebody's list of Philippine fighters likely to make the UFC.  Striegl's name appears in that list, but I don't consider that as significant and independent coverage, which is what the GNG requires.  Also note that that list was created 5 1/2 years ago and he has yet to make it to the UFC (that's why we have 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTALBALL)