Deletion of Swimming at the 2014 South American Games – Women's 100 Meter Breaststroke

Comment: No real deletion argument has been presented. Saying that it's not notable outside of South America |is not true. This is part of a larger series of a notable sporting event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:FARAWAY)

Comment: Just going to add that if this is kept, it should be moved back to :Swimming at the 2014 South American Games – Women's 100 metre breaststroke. Althought he move was made in good faith, it appears to have been an unnecessary one which is contrary to the naming/capitalization convention followed for other similar athletic event articles thoughout the encyclopedia. Whether it's worth keep this title as a redirect is probably something which should be discussed, but there's nothing wrong with "metre" and no need to change it to "meter" per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (:WP:RETAIN)

Comment: the implied reason for deletion is that the page is a violation of ; this can be viewed as a test-case for a (much wider) deletion if there's consensus that it is a violation.  I don't see it; Wikipedia also functions as an almanac and these tables are found in almanacs; having separate pages rather than a single Swimming at the 2014 South American Games page is an editorial decision that shouldn't depend on notability hoops.  There is a bit of a circular "keep this article because we keep this article", but until there's a convincing reason to delete, I'm fine with that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)