Deletion of 2016 Bernie Sanders Facebook groups suspension

Comment: Only in the crazy world of American politics could anybody argue for keeping an article about the temporary suspension of Facebook groups. This just isn't notable. No lasting significance. A totally trivial "story" picked up by the 24 hour news cycle. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: pretty  coverage with no-evidence of long term notability. Wikipedia is not a tabloid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: I don't see how this satisfies .  If it turns out to have some kind of lasting effect, we can revisit it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: per nomination, WPancake, and AusLondonder. Non-notable event per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per .  ''' ''Deus vult
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . A ''brief'' acknowledgement of this in Bernie Sanders presidential campaign, 2016 would be perfectly appropriate — but it doesn't have the lasting  significance necessary to warrant a separate article as a standalone topic in its own right. Plus a large percentage of KnowledgeBattle's listed sources above are |unreliable or |user-generated ones, which cannot be used to cover off notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YT||WP:RS||WP:USERG)

Comment: Every single source used in the article is  (all published from April 25-27); doesn't meet |the notability criteria for events. As it stands, the suspensions have not garnered significant attention from reliable sources; at most, it warrants a brief mention in the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign, 2016|Sanders presidential campaign article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:EVENT)