Deletion of Comparison of Roku boxes

Comment: to Roku. Consensus indicates that the table should be included in the Roku article per Talk:Roku#RfC:_Should_the_Feature_comparison_table_be_restored.3F|the RfC. While probably not a POV Split as it is neutral, it is still an unacceptable  as "Summary style splits must not be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article." This article is the embodiment of evading the consensus process
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: Not a  (see comments above). Consensus to keep this material has recently been reached at Talk:Roku#RfC:_Should_the_Feature_comparison_table_be_restored.3F. It is well sourced, has ample indications of notability and NPOV. Allegations of  (the bad kind) and  are untrue and irrelevant to the fate of this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVSPLIT||WP:CANVASSING||WP:FORUMSHOPPING)

Comment: The article contains useful information that is appropriate for Wikipedia and supported by a variety of reliable sources. These attributes make it irrelevant whether the article is perceived to be the result of a  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVSPLIT||WP:FORUMSHOPPING)