Deletion of RedBubble

Comment: The great thing about an online encyclopedia such as Wikipedia is that it is not contained by publishing costs to only cover the most important topics. There still must be some limit, so that companies no one has ever heard of, that have no reliably sourced information available about them cannot turn Wikipedia into an advertising agency. The community has drawn the line by deferring to the judgement of reliable sources about what they will bother to cover. Here, there are multiple, unambiguously reliable sources that have provided substantive coverage of the subject, the information in the article is |verifiable and the article clearly meets the . I disagree with the notion that we need to move the line on companies to be less inclusive, but if we are to do so, it should be done at well announced RFC to change policy, not by deleting articles that currently pass the requirements set out in policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: because the topic passes  and . Discussion about changing the notability guidelines for organizations and companies should occur at Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies), rather than in individual AfD discussions for articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)