Deletion of Ryan Fattman

Comment: Subject state legislator clearly satisfies .  Moreover, the footnoted independent, reliable sources already included in the article seem more than sufficient to satisfy the general notability guidelines per .  Any problems with "promotional" aspects of the article are  issues to be resolved by article editing, not article deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)

Comment: clearly notable per , nomination does not advance a valid reason for deletion, lots of keep !votes – why hasn't this been closed already
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: speedy''' if possible.) Members of a state legislature ''do'' qualify for articles under , and any content problems can be flagged for repair through the normal editing process — the article as a whole is ''not'' so egregiously written as to require the  treatment, so there was no valid reason to jump straight to an AFD nomination as the ''first'' line of response. (And, for that matter, I absolutely share Ravenswing's suspicions about brand new users whose ''very first'' contribution to Wikipedia is to initiate or participate in an AFD nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NUKEANDPAVE)

Comment: Ryan Fattman is a state legislator, thus passing . The references in the article support that. Can the nominator elaborate on how this breaches BLP
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)