Deletion of Daylight Origins Society

Comment: Per nom, per |notability, per Jim
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fringe, insufficient coverage by independent reliable sources. Nothing in GoogleNewshttp://news.google.com/news?tab=sn&sa=N&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Daylight+Origins+Society%22&sa=N, nothing in GoogleBookshttp://books.google.com/books?sa=N&tab=np&q=%22Daylight%20Origins%20Society%22, nothing in GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Daylight%20Origins%20Society%22&sa=N&tab=ps. Does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: there seems not to be enough evidence of notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I'd like to see this kept just to keep tabs on these organisations, but the article clearly fails  as it does not appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. On that basis I must support deletion unless good sources can be found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: A small organization, but |verifiable with enough references to allow time to find more. Also, as per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: not seeing any decent indications of |notability here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The sources simply do not have a sufficient depth of coverage of the ''article subject''. Narrowly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)