Deletion of Oligarchologist

Comment: per  and .  I could find http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1072AC8DF5FA7E32&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM exactly one news source mentioning oligarchology.  That is not enough for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:HAMMER||WP:GNG)

Comment: It's all very well to say that various people "''can be considered as''" oligarchologists; what is needed is evidence of use and discussion of the term to satisfy : "To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources such as books and papers ''about'' the term or concept, not books and papers ''that use'' the term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)