Deletion of Ahwazi Democratic Popular Front

Comment: Non-notable organisation regardless of the above rhetoric by the article's creator. Incidentally AfD is not the place to |soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: I'm not sure how this organisation fails . They seem to have attracted a reasonable amount of attention from external sources, such as this one http://english.aljazeera.net/English/archive/archive?ArchiveId=11349 from Al Jazeera, and this from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4721893.stm the BBC. Yes, the organisation has a strong bias towards Ahwazi independence, and may be a front group, but those aren't criteria for deletion. Some (but not all) exiled political groups deserve articles, and I feel this falls well within the criteria for inclusion. There's notability and verifiability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: the inclusion on the PFLP website's Arabic section denotes notability how? PEFL is itself a minor Arab  militant group, which is neither a reliable source, nor independent of the subject as required by notability guidelines.  The threshold of inclusion in English Wikipedia is widespread independent mainstream media coverage in English that meets the requirements of . The notability guidelines explicitly states that "'''trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per nom. Fails  among other problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)