Deletion of Guy Tarrant

Comment: This is ripe for wiki-lawyering, but if you accept that his show ''Confiscation Cabinets'' at the Victoria and Albert Museum's Museum of Childhood, London was an art show (i.e. that Tarrant was acting in his capacity as an artist when he created it), then he meets  thanks to coverage of his work in legitimate publications.https://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storyCode=6387548http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-12/03/confiscation-cabinets/viewgallery/330800http://www.timeout.com/london/things-to-do/confiscation-cabinetshttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2516840/Shocking-arsenal-weapons-confiscated-pupils-teachers.htmlhttp://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2013/11/27/british_toys_a_teacher_s_collection_of_confiscated_playthings.htmlhttp://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/gallery/2013/nov/10/toys-schools-confiscated If you don't accept that it's art (even in these days when curation is arthttp://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/the-artist-as-curator/), then he may meet  with all that coverage, but most is about the exhibition not him
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: I wonder if he meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)