Deletion of Resistance is futile (2 nomination)

Comment: I'm inclined to see the content kept either here or merged to the Borg (Star Trek) article. The assertion that it's used by the media is |not appropriately sourced: the pair of articles use the phrase in the headline, but what Wikipedia needs is an actual third-party assertion that headlines like that are, in fact, allusions to the Borg, and not some oddball coincidence. Perhaps the phrase itself originated elsewhere, and Star Trek's own appropriation of it -- while well known -- is not the "origin story" Wikipedia should offer up. Anyhow, I've removed some of the crufty primary source stuff better suited for wikiquote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: to Borg (Star Trek), where instances might be better handled in a footnote rather than article body, and the contextual statements aren't really needed.  I like ST too, but despite some notability of the phrase, there's not enough to say about it to expand, lacking the significant coverage of ; and it's basically a  or directly analogous to one as noted.  Many catchphrases redirect to their source (e.g. I'm a doctor, not a ... to Leonard McCoy, which is sensible and there's no shame in that.  Transwiki to Wikiquote and to Memory Alpha, which surprisingly doesn't seem to have it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:DICDEF)

Comment: Please understand me correctly: I am a huge scifi fan, I understand the cultural value of the phrase and had all intentions to expand the article. However during search, to my disappointment, I came to conclusion that there are to |reliable sources available to write a decent article. - Altenmann
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Schizombie. Much like Altenmann I |feel this ''ought'' to have enough sourcing for a full article, but that just doesn't appear to be the case. A section in Borg (Star Trek) mentioning the phrase (perhaps without a list of its every utterance) and its cultural signifcance seems appropriate
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LIKE)