Deletion of Herbert Hudson Taylor IV

Comment: I am of the opinion that sometimes |exceptions should be made to the |general rule about athletes, especially when an amateur is, |if true, one of the "top-ten pinners in all-time NCAA history." The |sourcing must be appropriate as well, but the NCAA website is fine for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:ATHLETE||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Whilst there may be issues with , I don't see an issue with  and there is definitely a case for a pass in both  and . I think this would be a case of believing that a likely pass for  is coming - probably in London in 2012. I know that's |crystal balling but as long as the other passes are there I think we could apply  here in order to overcome  requirements. '''RICK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE||WP:CBALL||WP:IAR||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: If I understand the  argument put forward by Brian NO college athlete in any sport with a professional league is notable - because they have not reach the higher platitude. I found a number of current college football and basketball players with articles. It needs to be clearly understood that there is currently no professional version of American college wrestling. The WWxx is considered an athletic farce by serious wrestler/athletes. Some college wrestlers chose to enter the professional ranks of ultimate fighting (UFC) or MMA, however, this is not an extension of college wrestling but leverages the same skill set. Many American college wrestlers do chose to pursue an Olympic opportunity in either Grecco Roman or the more popular Freestyle version. If true athletic notability in wrestling is to be considered then only scholastic  (also known as "Folkstyle" - including American collegiate) and Olympic styles are relevant to notability .  Obviously WWxx or other "professional" "wrestlers" can be notable for many reasons - however - not first and foremost for being "athletes" (as per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Fails .  Try again if/when he becomes a pro
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG)

Comment: It does not fail--to require an American wrestler to become a "pro" would ignore that the style of sport are completely different.  All of the above arguments to keep this article make perfect sense; and the votes to delete it are cursory. Also, the rules specifically say that new users are welcome to comment on these discussion boards.  Further, admins normally don't delete pages unless there is a consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Does not appear to satisfy  although he had a good career as a college athlete. Did not compete as a professional, nor in the Olympics or a world championship
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: but allow recreation if the kid gains true prominence. Until then, this article (and the kid) fail . For those not looking at Wikipedia's Athlete link, I have two questions: Has this athlete competed professionally? Has this athlete competed in the Olympics or some World Championship?  No? Then the kid doesn't meet thlete.  Nikki is right as well...the article fails to meet . Finally, "Professional Wrestling" (i.e. WWE) and competing in Greco-Roman wrestling at a Professional level are two different things.  I am surprised someone at the college level would miss that distinction
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:A||WP:GNG)