Deletion of Tommy John (apparel company)

Comment: a run-of-the-mill apparel company, with an article filled with puffery about a "candid approach" etc. At the moment of this vote, the article content is 100% promo, which is excluded per . Otherwise, significant RS coverage to meet  not found. The sources are largely  and there's nothing better out there, so delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP)

Comment: it has peacock-like language, possibly |due to PR types, but by way of |coverage, it appears to pass |as a notable company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NCORP)