Deletion of Retain (disambiguation)

Comment: Firstly, the nominator voted twice to try and boost the delete count.  Secondly, there are a number of disambiguation pages that house a couple of entries ala Beef Wellington (disambiguation) and Amy Hennig (disambiguation) which were both created by me.  .  Mr. C.C
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: The page already lists 3 items of contention: RETAIN (caps), "Retain International" and . Plus, there is the obvious need for new article "Retain (law)" as meaning to transfer funds to bind a lawyer to a retainer as counsel, which conflicts with the police seizing all money of a suspect. Anyway, the obsession to delete every budding dab-page is a waste of time, and hinders writers from just checking the dab-page and writing the next related article. Should Wikipedia have a dab-page for EVERY word? ...well it just about does already: that ship sailed a long time ago, with now over '''''121,000 dab-pages'''''. There is even a ''"Google (disambiguation)"'' listing the company, the search-engine name, a misspelling of "googol" and Barney Google, etc. Please stop these frivolous AfD debates on notable subjects and multi-use titles. Frivilous AfDs keep admins from performing valuable tasks, and pretend to be discussing merge or hat-note updates, without even contacting the authors of the related articles, such as "RETAIN" which would need a hat-note for "Retain International" and such. This debate needs to be CLOSED and moved into the talk-pages of related articles, as a discussion about changing their hat-notes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:RETAIN)