Deletion of Okashina Okashi - Strange Candy

Comment: Quite a few of the arguments on the previous AFD were that one of the comic's authors (Xuanwu) had contributed to the previous version; he has yet to appear in the edit logs of this version, and the AfD applies to this version, not the previous one.  A separate case for deleting this version has not been made, but assuming it is implied that the old reasons (, , , , , and ) still apply: WEB no longer applies per Buspar and VirtualSteve; the article is not (and never was) primarily about the comic's authors, so AB does not apply; the comic's authors have not edited this version, so VANITY does not apply; COPYVIO does not apply to this version (and had been fixed in the previous version before the AfD was complete anyway); NPOV applied neither to the old version nor to this version (the only argument that it did was that one of the comic's authors contributed, but he contributed in a NPOV manner, and again, said author has yet to even contribute to this version); and both the original version and this version cited sources, so NOR does not apply.  That seems to leave no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:VANITY||WP:COPYVIO||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:AB)

Comment: From reading the old AfD, the article was deleted under a different name for not meeting . Looks like the argument last time was that it only had one secondary source, the Hess publication, last time, which isn't enough to establish notability. But this time there are three secondary sources, so this seems to be satisfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)