Deletion of Zitku

Comment: I have read the discussion page and i feel the article does not violate . I am unsure about , my arguement is "should US citizens be not allowed to start an article on USA ?". I agree with what is written in  about autobiographies, but the rule does not apply here. I recommend we keep this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:AUTO||WP:AUTO)

Comment: This company (or product, I am not sure which) is not notable.  I was the earlier prod-er of this article.  The article's creator (also the person who removed the prod) is employed by the company, violating  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:AUTO)

Comment: Its new and not popular but it is a search engine and a crawler. How many crawlers are there in the world ? A 500 max, quite notable. Deserves a place in the encyclopedia, if this were a paperback endition, I would probably skip its inclusion. Removing the prod was not a good thing. I couldnt find anything that qualifies this article under . UnitedStatesian can you point out how is the point of view not neutral
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)