Deletion of Groups and individuals challenging the official account of 9/11 (2nd)

Comment: It's unclear what constitutes 'challenging the official account' and worth including here; determining that gets into  and other problems.   often comes into play with this article, with quotes people say being cherry picked here and portraying the person as "challenging the official account".   may be an issue here, as well.  The article is too problematic and we would be better off without it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOR||WP:BLP)

Comment: as nominated. Lists like these are too open for violations of  and  and are difficult to maintain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per nom.  Has been and always will be a place for |original research, and by its very nature requires the editor to violate .  Where in the erify|verifiable and |reliable press do we see such a list that we could legitimately summarize here?  No where
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH||WP:V||WP:RS)