Deletion of Baron de Wael

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can ''actually'' find the depth and quality of sourcing that it takes. As currently written and sourced, this is much more a ''genealogy'' than an encyclopedia article — there's ''no'' evidence being shown of |reliable source coverage about him at all. Wikipedia does not have a requirement that our sources be locatable online via a Google search — print-only books and newspaper archives are acceptable — but we do have a requirement that ''reliable'' sources ''exist''. But that's not what the sources here are, and nothing stated in the article is strong or substantiated well enough to earn him a free ''presumption'' of notability in the ''absence'' of a demonstrated GNG pass either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)