Deletion of List of Atheist fictional characters

Comment: OR magnet, and #IINFO|indiscriminate collection of information - if the characters have no other thing in common and even that can't be verified, it's unlikely to be useful to readers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I reiterate that the primary grounds for deletion is the |original research content of the article, which is a criterion for deletion in Wikipedia policy. I don't think anyone here has objected to creation of a List of fictional atheists that is not original research and which is well-sourced. There is no double standard. If List of fictional Catholics and List of fictitious Jews were primarily composed of original research, they would be appropriate candidates for deletion too. Merging of the small amount of properly sourced content of the List of Atheist fictional characters with the main List of atheists is in no a way binding precedent for merger of other lists of fictional religious adherents with lists of real-life religious adherents. If kept, significant cleanup of this list would involve deletion of most of the material
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Please note that nominator is an atheist, and anti-atheist bias was not a motivation for nomination, but rather concern over the original research content of the list, which is counter to Wikipedia's policy. A list of fictional atheists might be appropriate for inclusion in the encyclopedia, but the list as currently written violates . Deletion or a drastic rewrite with proper sourcing is needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)