Deletion of Robin Hood tax

Comment: The nomination and subsequent discussion are incoherent and we have better things to do than make sense of this gibberish.  In so far as there seems to be a problem, it can be addressed by normal editing and so, per , '''If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The lengthy discussion aside, it's not G11 and it's also not A10.  It meets , and while the article could use a bit of further polishing, it's not so irredeemably bad that only deletion will solve the issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)