Deletion of Heads Up For Tails

Comment: Despite have quite a few references, nothing I see satisfies . https://www.petage.com/heads-up-for-tails-india-based-dog-accessory-brand-enters-us-marketplace/ This one is close but it is basically an announcement so not useful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: There are lots of press releases available about the company if you search LiveMint, TOI/Economic Times and VCCircle. There is even one entire article in AsianAge where the founder of the company has described it in detail. There are also independent (non-news) websites where the founder has given interviews to promote the company. Despite so many sources, it has been nominated for deletion. Why is it than articles about India (and Asia) are nominated for deletion so often? I cannot help but feel this is a case of  and it is highly discouraging for me. This is a small emerging company but it is not fake. I have personally seen one of their three outlets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: There are enough independent and RS to pass notability. Though some clean up was needed. I did. I removed refs which looked pr and added more refs, finding from Google. If still needed any improvement to the article, please 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:FIXIT)

Comment: the sources I see I mostly PR driven or trivial mentions, not meeting . One of the keep voters suggests that this is sufficient coverage, as in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)