Deletion of Nicolas Savin

Comment: with appreciation of the improvements since nomination, turning a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nicolas_Savin&action=historysubmit&diff=443145249&oldid=443087664 stub into a decently sourced and encyclopedic article to serve our readers. Improvements since the last ''delete !vote above'' show this topic as being NOT a hoax, and indeed |covered in multiple independent sources. Historical notability IS notability, and exactly what this encyclopedia is all about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not entirely convinced but there seems to be enough references now to make an argument to delete on the basis of a lack of  untenable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Fails |verifiability. He does not appear to even be mentioned in the first reference, and the others are a blog which does not appear to satisfy . Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, so also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V||WP:BIO)