Deletion of 2006 FIFA World Cup controversies

Comment: per ; unverifiable and/or non-notable refereeing errors are not the basis of an NPOV article in an enyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: blatantly fails . Absolutely nothing here worth merging
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: to conform with  and to cut down the excesses.  I think it will be sufficient to cover each controversial event in a few sentences, noting what the event is, the opposite viewpoints over the controversy and some references, without going through all the details.  2006 FIFA World Cup miscellany should be a pretty good reference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per Batman2005. POV essay going nowhere fast. Australia call the penalty a controvery, but Italy don't. Same applies to all the rest. Intrinsically POV and poised to turn into a full blown Conspiracy Theory  fail. Some parts - the record number of sendings-off in one game, for example - need to go in 2006 FIFA World Cup trivia section, but the interpretation of this as a "controversy" should be left to the reader, not rammed down their throat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Fails #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information.  Bits of unrelated trivia culled together into one article. Also major problems with .  The so-called section of "Disputed calls" essentially accuses referees of making mistakes on those plays
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)