Deletion of The Five (comics)

Comment: due to a lack of coverage in third party sources. All sources look to be trivial mentions and/or plot summaries, so this doesn't pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:N)

Comment: Non-notable article that fails GNG, per TTN. All keep votes so far have been . Where are the reliable sources? So far, nobody has brought them up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SOURCESEXIST)

Comment: Article does not meet  or , sources are mainly primary, not secondary   sources with . The rest are either promotional or mentions, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  showed nothing that would establish notability. Article is  / , nothing properly sourced for a merge.  &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FICTION||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE||WP:OR||WP:SNYTH)

Comment: The few non-primary sources that are being used in the article are entirely just plot summaries, and do not provide any actual commentary or explanation of notability.  The various Keep votes above (not counting the ones that are nothing more than  statements that should be discounted) just state that the article needs development and that there are enough sources, but have failed to actually provide what these sources are that would allow this article to be developed beyond simple .  A Redirect to Dawn of X, which was mentioned somewhere above, could also be feasible, but there has been no demonstration in this AFD that this fictional group is notable enough for a stand alone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:PLOT)

Comment: No keep voter has explained how this meets /GNG. It's pure  - plot summary and list of appearances. There is no reception, no discussion of impact or significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFICT||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: per above comments, or '''merge''' to Dawn of X per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: reviewing the sources there's nothing to cover that isn't just a plot recap, which is what Wikipedia articles are . As something unsourced or primary sourced it also fails the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG)