Deletion of Singles Collection (Britney Spears album)

Comment: per the nominator as it fails . |Existing is one thing—being notable is an entirely different one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS||WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: Why do you hate Britney Spears? ( footnote 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMERTIME)

Comment: It can't be snowed as there are still delete !votes left. I'm sure the closing admin can judge the article based on what it looks like now and not when it was nominated and I'm sure the admin can see through the heckling of the first few keep !votes and the attempt to have an article deleted based on |an essay with no reference to any actual policy or even guideline that would apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER)

Comment: I've added sources showing non-trivial coverage by NBC Miami and Rolling Stone Magazine. That should do it as it now satisfies 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per : "''Existence is important
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: I'd like to remind the closing admin that AFD is a discussion and not a vote. I also don't see most of these comments addressing notability concerns. Actually, most of them just say "|it exists". Sure, Dale cited  as a deletion reason, but it's not the ''only'' reason he used. I cannot find any reliable, ''third-party'' sources. That means other than Spears' website, other than fansites, other than fan-forums. It doesn't meet  for that reason
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NALBUMS)

Comment: Per , "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia."  I see no reason to contradict the general rule here.  Although the album has not yet been released,  allows for future events if they are notable and are almost certain to occur.  And in this case, even if the album were to be cancelled, there would likely be a lot of coverage surrounding the cancellation, making this notable as a cancelled album.  Of course, in the unlikely event that it gets cancelled without significant coverage, deletion may prove appropriate, buy as of now I don't see any guideline preventing keeping
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS||WP:CRYSTAL)