Deletion of Alicia Nash

Comment: FFS,  - an  which is  does not say that subjects who happen to be related to other people have to pass a higher bar of .  Don't be such a tool
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:ESSAY||WP:NOTPOLICY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly meets . Coulda, shoulda hadda article years ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The idea that articles on notable women with more-notable husbands should be deleted or redirected on the basis that coverage is unequally shared is really unfortunate. If that's how people are (mis)reading  and , then one or both needs fixing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLPFAMILY)

Comment: per . She is extensively discussed in sources, the best among these being A Beautiful Mind (book)|Nasar's book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)