Deletion of Faizan

Comment: No, this article is not against any |general notability guideline new |citations are updated including a reference of book which consider as |eligible source nominator should know AfD is not |clean up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOURCE||WP:SECONDARY||WP:CLEAN)

Comment: there is no valid rationale for deletion here. ikipedia is not paper and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: spaced ndash}}AFD is not clean-up. The nomination doesn't contain a valid rationale for deletion, per criterion listed at -REASON. The nominator seems unsure about the topic's notability, rather than advancing notions why the topic isn't notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: as failing . Wikipedia is not a dictionary (of names or other words). To the extent the references are not broken links, they are only other dictionary entries (of unclear reliability); this is not the sort of coverage required for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)