Deletion of Fei-Yue Wang

Comment: He ''clearly'' meets  which is just as legitimate a guideline as . All claims in the article are verifiable. Those making snarky remarks about that guideline and the academic societies should lobby for change elsewhere, since their comments are not valid here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: I rewrote the article. It now indicates a eight-fold pass of : (1-3) fellow of three major learned societies, (4-6) editor-in-chief of three journals (there was a fourth journal that I didn't mention because I'm not convinced it's significant), (7) president of IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Society|IEEE ITSS, (8) heavily-cited publications in his Google Scholar profile. But since four of the eight were already in the article before I rewrote it, and the rewrite did nothing to change the existence of sources for this material (only their accessibility to lazy readers), I don't expect this to change the minds of the editors above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as a fellow of IEEE and AAAS (#C3). But the two previous deletions were because it was copied and pasted from his CV (#G12) and this may need permanent protection to keep the SPA from turning it back into a CV again
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CSD)

Comment: Terrible article as it stands and initially I thought he failed  and , but he was a keynote speaker at this year's IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium http://iv2017.org/keynote-speakers/ His bio there says "He was the Founding Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems from 1995 to 2000, the Series on Intelligent Control and Intelligent Automation from 1996 to 2004, and IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems from 2006 to 2008, and the EiC of IEEE Intelligent Systems from 2009 to 2012. Currently, he is the EiC of IEEE Transactions on ITS. " With verification this would be sufficient to pass point 8 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: I would echo the warnings of other editors about IEEE. I think the technical standards and Computer Science sides are respectable, but it's a federal organization and the quality varies widely. Some of their online journals and proceedings publish articles that would struggle to get through AfD and certainly should not count as RSs. Both the AAAS and the IEEE have thousands of fellows; it is an honour, but it's not sufficient for notability. I am surprised it's present in  as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(academics)/Archive_7#IEEE_Fellows_are_notable.3F we recently had a consensus to remove it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)