Deletion of List of selfie-related injuries and deaths (2nd nomination)

Comment: a total  of non-notable |news stories. The only positive is that there are some really dumb people who are no longer in the gene pool
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The sources themselves may be reliable, that is insufficient; they must demonstrate  and , which, each entry being so , they do not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:TRIVIAL)

Comment: There's a decent case for  based on coverage of selfie-related injuries and deaths as a group, but I think the stronger reason to keep is considering this as a split from Selfie. There's no doubt that selfie-related safety has gotten quite a bit of attention sufficient to be prominent in the article about selfies, but there are enough examples such that it makes a bit of sense ("a bit" hence "weak" keep) to just spin it out. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: The topic passes , having "been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." For source examples, start with the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of selfie-related injuries and deaths|the previous AfD discussion. The list is also a valuable information source, as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTPURP)