Deletion of Ethics in public administration

Comment: to Public sector ethics which is at least cited. Ethics in public administration contains only one very poor reference, added by an SPA back in September, who also added most of the uncited content in a single edit; the reference appears to be  to boot. The article was in fact a bit better before that addition, but brief and totally uncited. Given the strong overlap, and the not unreasonable alternative title, a redirect seems the right solution
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: to Public sector ethics. While the version of the article nominated doesn't ''look and read'' encyclopedic and is poorly sourced, it is most definitely not a subject of riginal research. A quick search will show http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2/180-1867302-4347869?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=public+administration+ethics hundreds of textbooks available from Amazon. I find the subject otable because of all this academic coverage of the subject. A ''Redirect'' is appropriate since a very-similar, well-sourced, peer-reviewed article already exists
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:N)