Deletion of Code page 293

Comment: I'm really conflicted here.  On the one hand, I doubt this meets .  On the other hand, the basic concept of different character sets and/or codepages is clearly an important topic.  It's also useful to archive information about all of these historical codepages somewhere.  The question is whether wikipedia is the right place.  I don't have a good answer for that.  If there were some other stable/durable place where this information was archived, then I'd say we don't need it.  But, I don't know of such a place (codepageapedia, anyone?).  Given that no better archive exists, I think it's reasonable to bend our rules a bit and say keep it here.  I'd also like to see a general policy statement emerge, rather than having this same debate over and over for each individual example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Even the original version of the article was sourced with a top reliable reference (although badly formatted), showing that the nominator did neither attempt to do his homework (per ) before nominating the article for deletion, nor made any (even trivial) attempts to improve the article (by formatting the given source correctly) as would have been his duty before nominating the article for deletion. If the nominator really was uncapable of identifying or reformatting the given source himself, he could have asked for sources via our established article improvement procedures instead of asking for deletion. This has been explained to the nominator several times already, therefore this must be seen as unconstructive behaviour
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)