Deletion of Jarlaxle

Comment: as this article fails #PLOT by a mile with its heavily #The problem with in-universe perspective|in universe perspective. Worse still, there are no footnotes to |verify the primary sources have been cited, and the there are no |reliable sources to evidence |notability outside of the game from which this stock character was created for. This article looks like someone spent a long time working on it, but its shallow disregard for WP guidelines suggests it is a copy and paste from a http://www.fancruft.net/Jarlaxle fansite
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WAF||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:FICT)

Comment: As per , article is subject to deletion '''where no verifiable sources can be found.''' This is not the case here. '''Nowhere''' in  does it say that an article should be deleted because it is not up to Wikipedia standards in terms of proper sourcing and citation. --Anon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:PROVEIT||WP:V)

Comment: as per , among other things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: A lack of verifiable third-party sources means the subject of the article is not notable, per : "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)