Deletion of Weffriddles

Comment: fails unwavering requirements of , which leads to failing  as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:WEB)

Comment: and '''salt''' - fails , .  And, pull the eyes off the sockpupets and show them to be the true socktrolls they truly are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:WEB)

Comment: I do NOT agree with the reasons for starting this AFD, however I do think that this pages should be removed for other reasons,  Specifically, it failed , , and . Wikipedia is NOT here so people can use it to post hints, cheats, or answers about games. Delete the article, and lock to prevent it being re-created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: What a surreal AfD. Anyway, no reliable third-party sources, , you know the drill
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I missed this comment before but "20,000 registered members on the Weffriddles forums" does not mean a thing.  I like to use the "World of Warcraft" forums which have over 2 million registered members, and the "Eve:Online" forums which have 200,000 members. Neither have an article because neither pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The debate over whether or not this article is notable quite astounding. The article definitely fails  and therefore I agree with the AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Ok, let's break down  and see if this website and article meet the critria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: disregarding for a moment the somewhat odd reasoning that has led this to AfD, I don't see any indication this website meets the  criteria.  If someone can show some evidence it does meet the core  criteria, I'd be willing to reconsider though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)