Deletion of Pre-Iraq War opinion on Saddam Hussein

Comment: With an unencyclopedic title like that, this is always going to be either an #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|indiscriminate collection of information or a POV #Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought|essay. Wikipedia (including this AfD discussion) is #Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox|not a soapbox. An encyclopedia is not the place for this. Some of this information may be appropriate for http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Main_Page wikiquote though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: It has an axe to grind but that doesn't mean it should be deleted instead of fixed.  It's only two weeks old and almost all the edits are from one user.  With time we can make it conform to .  People won't fix it if it's going to be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: as a violation of  Section 1.5.3.  This is... a bunch of quotes.  That makes it a violation of the policy against collections of primary source material.  Plus, I think there's an original research issue here.  If someone else had done a literature review, and an article in the "Academic Journal Of American Opinion" had used all the quotes copied here to do a statistical analysis on "Pre-Iraq War ''U.S.'' opinion on Saddam Hussein" (there's a systemic bias issue in the current list, but that's not grounds for deletion), we could use that journal article as a source.  The quotes themselves, though, without an intermediary analyst... I think is too far in the direction of original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)