Deletion of Comparison of Battlestar Galactica (1978) and Battlestar Galactica (2003)

Comment: What an enormous amount of material! It's all unsourced, even if uncontroversial, so it falls somewhere into the "marshy middle ground" between |original research and |synthesis. I would change this opinion, of course, if an ''independent source'' made the comparison (rather than the ''article editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN)

Comment: it is rather unfortunate that the |original research policy, originally designed to keep crackpot claims from being treated as legitimate encyclopedic facts, is being used to remove material such as this. The "claims" being made by this article are verifiable by anyone who has viewed the two series. This is as much "original research" as saying "the sun is hot" is; and while there do seem to be people who would demand a citation for saying "the sun is hot" (and sure, such a citation could be found, but that's not the point), common sense should override the literal application of policy. That's why we have |ignore all rules. The fact that license issues forbid us from transwiki-ing this to BSW only intensifies the arguement to keep, instead of allowing a good collaborative article like this to be wiped out in the collateral damage of hyperenforcement of policies, an inexplicable hatred of "fancruft", and incompatibilities of licenes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:IAR)