Deletion of Electro Homeopathy

Comment: Watch out for .  I'm sure this is total bollocks, but it's also quite likely to be ''notable'' bollocks (as for homeopathy itself), in which case it does belong here (if only for the first objective commentary it has ever seen). Investigation is required before one could comment as to whether it is notable bollocks (I'm short on time so guidance is welcome) but we shouldn't be too hasty
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: While I definitely lean towards '''delete''', the founder of this pseudoscience appears to have plenty of refs (and his own museum http://www.cesaremattei.com/!) so there may be an article struggling to get out here, although this probably isn't it. A major rewrite with  might save the day
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)