Deletion of Burrito unicorn

Comment: per nomination.  Fails to credibly assert , no .  If RS could be found for it, sufficient for at least some bare minimum notability, then fair enough, but can't be anything other than delete without them.  No prejudice against it returning if it ever satisfies those concerns (seems unlikely, but you never know
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS)

Comment: We are looking for sources to establish that this cute, imaginary creature is a subject of substantial coverage in independent |reliable sources, at least in Seattle and preferably not just locally.  The best I could do is http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/09/03/meanwhile-in-burrito-unicorn-news a brief entry dated September 3, 2010 in ''The Stranger (newspaper)|The Stranger'' "Slog" blog that verifies there was a "missing" sign posted in the Capitol Hill, Seattle|Capitol Hill neighborhood.  Nothing in the ''Seattle Times'' or ''Seattle Weekly'', even.   This is simply not enough to satisfy Wikipedia's |general notability guideline or any other special purpose guideline I can think of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)