Deletion of Grayshot

Comment: as notability isn't proven. As per  though, if it becomes notable the article can be recreated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:SCRABBLE)

Comment: The only sources are primary, articles need multiple |reliable secondary sources in order to be considered |notable, in WP's terms. There's a small piece in http://kotaku.com/374613/paramount-planning-cloverfield-game Kotaku, which is as much about the prospect of an official game as it is Grayshot, and a press release that was picked up by http://news.filefront.com/new-indie-developer-takes-shot-at-cloverfield-inspired-game/ Gaming Today, neither of which are in-depth and only one of which is independent. They're listed on the game's http://grayshotgame.com/press/ press page, I'm not having any luck in finding more. The long and short of it is that this is too early to be creating an article on WP. Deletion does not permanently remove what's there, if the game does pass  at some point then it can be restored, cited with additional sources and restored to the encyclopedia. I would oppose a merge or redirect to Half Life 2, despite using the source engine and requiring HL2 (apparently) to run, this is a separate game and needs to stand on its own two feet, if it is released then it is very likely that it will receive enough press to sustain an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: fails ; also, the developer appears to be non-notable itself, which is a minus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)