Deletion of EditPlus (2nd nomination)

Comment: All I could find reference wise about this was a single trivial source and the article is completely void of anything to help it be notable. So, I agree with the nominator that it fails both  and the notability guidelines for software. I'm not sure what the keep voter is talking about with the whole "robustness of the page" thing, but we aren't talking about food or something here and 100% the article lacking any references matter if there's no other references out there to add to it. Which there isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: well, if there are no references to be found, than this article fails  and as thus is not notable. "Robustness of the page" is not a reason to keep, in fact that makes the article worse since it is certainly entirely |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)