Deletion of Chile–Estonia relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: for lack of sources documenting "Chile–Estonia relations" as such, and for trivia abusively substituting for actual coverage in independent sources. This fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article has no useful content and very little prospect of expansion. No sources indicate these relations are notable. Here is what the article says: They have diplomatic relations, and a visa-free travel agreement, and plans for more; trade occurs; Chile is one of a number of countries to have jointly issued a stamp with Estonia, three Chilean books have been translated into Estonian. These arbitrary facts are fine, but Chile has 15 million people so it's not surprising that some of those people end up doing business in each country of the world. We have to decide: are there to be 18,000 ''X–Y relations'' articles with non-notable lists of Google search results? This article fails |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Topic fails --no independent, secondary sources that discuss in a non-trivial could be located for this "topic" could be located.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Chile-Estonia+relations%22+OR+%22Estonia-Chile+relations%22+OR+%22relations+between+Chile+and+Estonia%22+OR+%22relations+between+Estonia+and+Chile%22&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= Consensus at previous AfDs is that the mere existence of diplomatic relations does not constitute notability. See, for example rticles for deletion/Laos-Romania relations, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Canada–Moldova_relations, or Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bilateral_relations_of_Ireland
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:A)