Deletion of Richard Wagner's first love

Comment: as lacking |reliable sources to substantiate the existing content. I don't see enough coverage here to justify a separate article on this topic. If there were a sufficient basis to justify a separate article on Leah David, I would accept one; but the tenuous assertion that this is a significant episode in Wagner's life doesn't convince me. If it's of demonstrable significance, it belongs in Richard Wagner; if not, it doesn't belong at all. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Subject is unencyclopedic.  Creating a separate spin-off article about Wagner's girlfriend gives far more |undue weight than creating a section in the main article.  It's very unlikely that there is enough encyclopedic information about this subject to actually fill up an article.  Creating a short section in Richard Wagner (or perhaps even a somewhat longer treatment in Wagner controversies, if appropriate) which mentions the affair along with a few sentences about what happened and why it was notable would give this the proper amount of weight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: The woman herself would fail notability policy per .  But this isn't an attempt to write a bio of her, otherwise the article title would be Leah David.  What we have here is an apparently hastily-written "look at the antisemite who once had a Jewish girlfriend!" attempt at an article, which appears to be a clear-cut  given that it was recently removed from Richard Wagner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: because per , "everything connected to Richard Wager" is NOT notable - they have to stand on their own, and I just don't see that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)