Deletion of Clarence Bijl

Comment: passes , and there look to be a number of sources out there. Needs improving, not deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: There is a difference to a player who has finished his career to a player that's starting out, each footballer needs to be weighed on their own merits. As this one is at the start of this career I give more weight to  and have some faith that additional events will come to push  and this is normally the case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: per : ''Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a competitive game between two teams from fully-professional leagues, will generally be regarded as notable. ... For the purposes of this guideline, played means having appeared in a match either in the starting line-up or coming on as a substitute.'' In other words, the guideline is clear and the delete opinions are not well rooted in our guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: All the NFOOTY votes above should be ignored, as NFOOTY merely creates a presumption of GNG - however GNG is being challenged here. I went over every single google-news hit on "Clarence Bijl" - there's quite a few - but the vast majority is merely appearance in a list of players at ASWH in rather local sources - which would not be in-depth coverage (mere namedrop). The sole semblance of in-depth coverage I've managed to find is - https://www.voetbalrotterdam.nl/2018/05/clarence-bijl-fc-dordrecht-naar-aswh/https://www.voetbal247.nl/aswh-versterkt-zich-met-fc-dordrecht-talent-clarence-bijl/https://hendrik-ido-ambacht.dekombinatie.nl/nieuws/algemeen/458363/-ik-wil-absoluut-slagen-bij-aswh- - without even getting into the question of whether these are RSes for a BLP - even if we assume they are RSes - they fail  as they are not independent of the club (merely re-hashing of PR/interview with the club/Bijl), are rather brief, and cover a single event (his signing by the 4th tier ASWH). As such - it is actually rather obvious that  is not met, and absent someone coming up with "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - it is a rather clear delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)