Deletion of Lee Myxter

Comment: Seems to pass  easily as he has been a member of a legislative body
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Straight pass of . The goal is to have biographies of all federal and statewide elected officials. Whether or not the current state of an article is a stub, there will be sources available to improve the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: State legislators have a straight pass of  #1. The current quality of the article is not relevant to their keepability at all — state legislators ''always'' have media coverage, and we're just not always on the ball about actually ''finding'' and ''using'' all of it, which is not the same thing as coverage not existing in the first place. And since the creator used the AFC process, and the article was approved by an AFC reviewer who ''isn't'' under any similar restrictions, the original creator's restriction on creating articles is not a problem either since external oversight was involved. And yes, when it comes to state legislators our goal ''is'' to be as ''complete'' as feasibly possible a reference for ''all'' of them, not to pick and choose that some are more notable than others for some arbitrary reason ''outside'' of their having being covered by the media in the context of holding a notable political office — so precisely ''because'' better sourcing ''does'' exist to ''repair'' an inadequate article about a state legislator with, articles about state legislators are ''not'' deleted just for not already being in better shape than they are. Plus the AFC reviewer has personally ''already done'' some work on improving the sourcing here, so this article ''is'' already in better shape than it was at the time of nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)