Deletion of Gayelle (lesbian)

Comment: Fails , sourcing is blogs and the for-profit organization pushing this trademarked term for a line of merchandise, some sources note this article as evidence of notability setting up a vicious circle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: I agree with everyone above, None of the sources featured are |reliable sources and
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: standard failure of . It isn't a "clothes shop", though, it's just a cafepress attached to a pretty basic one-issue website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per , , and also, probably, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: After being asked to reconsider the revised version I find it improved but still failing notability. Sources 1 and 2 are the same article in a slightly different wrapper, the bulk of the remaining sources are blogs or the self-interested Sapphic Chic website, and source 11 is the "Neology" blog which only goes to proving that  applies here.  None of this goes to proving notability, only that a few bloggers will respond to a press release for an attention grabbing "funny" story. If pressed again I will change my vote... to '''Strong Delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Fail . Also, Wikipedia is not a |soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:SOAPBOX)