Deletion of Carl Bergmanson

Comment: Neither being mayor of a small town nor being an unsuccessful candidate in a party primary passes , and the sourcing here is not good enough to claim that he passes  in lieu. There are six footnotes, of which one is a repetition of one of the other five — so there are really only five sources, of which one is a WordPress blog, one is his own |self-published campaign website, and one is his small town's local pennysaver. None of the article's content or sourcing is enough to deem him notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:SELFPUB)

Comment: nbsp; to Mayors of Glen Ridge, New Jersey or Local government of Glen Ridge, New Jersey or Glen Ridge, New Jersey.&nbsp; Mayors are inherently part of a larger topic on Wikipedia, so Wikipedia's notability is ''never'' a threshold for inclusion given  and .&nbsp; Given additional reliable sources, being a losing candidate for a state-level office increases notability.&nbsp; Being a losing candidate for a state-level office is certainly not a gotcha that prevents editors of Glen Ridge, New Jersey from covering WP:DUE topics of Glen Ridge.&nbsp; A Wikipedia search on "Carl Bergmanson" shows that the topic is covered in five other articles.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:ATD)

Comment: does not meet  as a mayor of a small town or as an unsuccessful candidate in a party primary. Coverage is in passing and / or routine. Does not meet  /  for lack of sufficient reliable, independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Losing candidate with only |routine coverage. Such politicians are generally deleted per  unless significant multiple sources can help them pass GNG. That is not the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NPOL)