Deletion of Young Critics Circle

Comment: Article was nominated based on incorrect understanding of Wikipedia policies.  Being unsourced or having a list of sources but no inline citations is not reason for deletion: see , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NNC||WP:NRVE)

Comment: notable organization in the context of Philippine culture, multiple reliable sources present in the article, more available for example http://www.google.cz/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=%22Beverly+Glenn%22+%22Dove+Award%22&oq=%22Beverly+Glenn%22+%22Dove+Award%22&gs_l=news-cc.12..43j43i400.2751.2751.0.3698.1.1.0.0.0.0.53.53.1.1.0...0.0...1ac.MWE9Wl9K8Yk#q=%22young+critics+circle%22+philippines&hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=7cEHUIyAEsim0QX1icDpBA&sqi=2&pjf=1&ved=0CCIQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=88e9449b56b9d270&biw=1280&bih=793 here. In my opinion meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but the organization is not that well known in the Philippines (unless you're into film circles), but easily passes ; it seems that their influence is being overblown both in the article and in this discussion. For example, in the List of people who won the Philippine showbiz grand slam, the YCC has been added along with the "Big 4" award-giving podies and the PMPC, while leaving out other more well known bodies such as the Guillermo Mendoza Foundation amd whoever awards the Box Office King/Queens, etc. Probably the same people who added those created the YCC article. Not that it's wrong but those who  added that to the grand slam article where looking for too much legitimacy when they can already pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)