Deletion of Kristi Addis

Comment: and redirect.  and  go back to the beginning of time. We can't have an article - especially a biography - about a subject that has not been substantially covered in reliable independent sources; in this case there is no coverage of the subject, only the pageant. That invokes . I am concerned that people are misinterpreting a a guideline that says people are ''likely'' to be notable if they have won a major pageant, as meaning that ''are'' notable. On Wikipedia, notability comes form depth of sourcing, not from box-ticking. And what constitutes a major pageant is contentious: as far as the real world is concerned, only Miss World gets any serious mind share. Miss Teen America is $RANDOMPAGEANT as far as most people are concerned. Bring me sources that are about the subject and go beyond the pageant. Remember, Wikipedia is not a directory, of pageant winners or anything else. Hotties are not inherently notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Miss Teen USA per  and not well known one at that. Nominator's analysis of available sources is compelling and shows that this level win does not lead to notability. The newspaper coverage is all about the win, with no substance as to the subject herself, which illustrates BIO1E well. Cited material can be moved to the Miss Teen USA article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: See also rticles for deletion/Katie Blair (2nd nomination) and  rticles for deletion/Tami Farrell both leaning towards keep at this stage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:A)