Deletion of British Imperial Lifeline

Comment: With respect, nobody has explained to me in this discussion (1) Why the minimal content in this article can't be relegated to British Empire and kept there, (2) ''How'' the topic, in its own right, is encyclopedic, ie. in need of its own article, and what this article will contain.  My personal suspicion is that the title of the article is |Original Research, given that a quick google turns up practically no results outside of Wikipedia. It's not ''my responsibility'' to turn this article into something useful, given that I don't see what it's doing outside of British Empire, or even why the article is titled the way it is. An article that is unreferenced and not demonstrably useful certainly makes Wikipedia worse; frankly, assuming that my nominating this article for deletion is a "waste of time" is itself a misunderstanding of the purpose of AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per the cite of  by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: 1) I agree that a merge might be more appropriate, but they go through the process set out at  rather than AfD 2) The topic is notable, but its title is awful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGE)

Comment: per  with rescue by Joshdboz
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)