Deletion of Pittot Films

Comment: per /. As a production company this is not a notable entity. Third party references in the article do not discuss the production company, and in any case are pretty shaky basis for an article about anything. Rogue Cinema is possibly OK for the actor being interviewed--though it should be noted that interviews aren't the best sources. The NY Times page (not article) is just syndicated data of unclear authorship. There are quite literally 109 ghits on this subject, many of which are user profiles or otherwise user-generated content. Admittedly, we may be looking at the "next big thing", but as is our practice we need to wait for that thing to become big before making an article about it. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CORP)

Comment: fails  as http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Pittot+Films%22&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8 availble web results do not show notability.  The included section or "sub-article" about their film http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1556933/ ''City of the Damned'' might later merit its own article, but it sure doesn't belong in this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)