Deletion of Case race (2nd nomination)

Comment: I agree this article should be deleted but I still don't think  applies and this should be deleted on the basis of notability.  seeks to prevent step by step guides and how-to's.  doesn't have anything to do with listing the rules and setup of a game in an encyclopedic way. Almost all articles that are about a game detail the rules and how to play it(example Ultimate Frisbee, I'm not making a  argument but just pointing out the precedence for writing game articles includes a description of the rules and how to play). When  mentioned game guides I believe it is referring to walk-through type material related to video games and other lengthy discussions about play
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:NOTMANUAL)

Comment:  doesn't really apply here as the article is detailing the rules of a game which is different than a step by step instruction on how to play. I don't think  was meant to apply to game rules as you can find many listings of rules for many different types of games presented in a way very similar to this article. I don't think this falls into  either since this is a pretty well known game. All that said I still think it should be deleted due to it's lack of citations which suggest it may not be notable enough at the present time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:NFT)

Comment: Definitely agree with nom about . Has to go. No notability at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL)

Comment: No assertion of notability, no sources; fails . Could be included in an article listing all the |things made up on the Internet, but not notable as a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFT)