Deletion of Cardinals–Royals rivalry (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Tempdog, and based on |past outcomes such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alabama–Penn State football rivalry - Wikipedia:NRIVALRY#Rivalries|prominent rivalries are usually |notable, and I think this fits the bill
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:GNG)

Comment: I !voted "weak keep" last time, mainly since "there's likely other tidbits floating around about the 'rivalry'".  That was a presumption on my part.  However, I am disappointed that more sources have not been identified to satisfy 's requirement of multiple independent sources of significant coverage since the last AfD, which was a "weak keep" consensus.   Note also that the article had been http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cardinals%E2%80%93Royals_rivalry&diff=461350426&oldid=460806407 tagged with not meeting GNG since November 2011.  My |good faith recommendation, taking into account people have real lives, is for interested editors to agree on a timeline whereby sufficient sources will be identified so a consensus can be reached on notability. Would another month be sufficient
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AGF)

Comment: facing each other in the World Series is not a rivalry, no indication in national sources that this is a notable rivalry, it's all local, team, and some fan blogs sources some of which doesn't look like to be |independent of the rivalry. It's like saying Marlins and Yankees are a rivalry because they played against each other in the World Series and there is probably more Yankees fans than Marlins fans in Miami. Every local newspaper will mention any team playing each other as a rivalry. The first close was really a no consensus, so the AFD is valid here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDEPENDENT)