Deletion of Louis Epstein (supercentenarian tracker)

Comment: If'' there are sources which demonstrate notability then I would be delighted to withdraw the nomination. But I also think it's important to note that notability is not established by primary sources, or by trivial secondary sources such as inclusion in a list of participants at a conference. Please do read and study 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Louis is a neat guy, a dilligent researcher, and a tenacious defender of the Divine Right of Kings, but I can't see how he meets . I don't think merging makes sense; his political and business activities aren't really relevant to his tracking of supercentenarians. I think it's sufficient to note that he is the author of the lists in question, and leave it at that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As it stands this article comes very short of the requisite standards to be met under . I would seriously suggest that Ryoung122 actually reads ,  and more importantly  before he creates any similar articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:COI)

Comment: Maybe he will pass  in due course but he has not yet done so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)