Deletion of Sakari Momoi

Comment: Per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Misao_Okawa&diff=685940569&oldid=685938253 this. This editor nominated a list articles of oldest living humans and cited . This person is clearly notable per my diff statement and is not eligible for deletion per |AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:AFD)

Comment: Obviously. Nominator has proposed a number of articles be deleted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ethel_Lang_(supercentenarian) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sakari_Momoi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kathleen_Snavely https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Goldie_Steinberg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gertrude_Weaver https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orma_Slack), including well sourced articles that clearly pass , for no reason other than " just don't like it|I just don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:I)

Comment: As discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koto Okubo (2nd nomination), even in ''2012'' being the oldest woman in Asia wasn't sufficient for notability to create a separate article (and the oldest in the world wasn't sufficient in 2015). The problem is the numerous s who have voraciously fought on these articles for a decade. Plus these articles (at least the English ones I can read) are obituaries and thus what was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Taggart (2nd nomination) as  coverage as opposed to actual sources that would fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:ROUTINE||WP:N)