Deletion of The Smashing Pumpkins (album)

Comment: A promotional release that as it stands does not pass . Eric444's other stuff argument referenced above was in addition to the albums charting and receiving coverage from reliable secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)

Comment: I have no idea what provoked this outburst from TPH. It seems to me rather frivolous to cite  for the rule that "the existence of other, similar articles is immaterial" when  says quite plainly, in #Precedent in usage, that sometimes that factor is material, if not decisive. And it's a point that's been sustained/supported in other AFD discussionshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Devlin_O%27Ryan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Katy_Hudson_(album) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Best_of_The_Velvet_Underground:_The_Millennium_Collection_%282nd_nomination%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Beyond_Elysian_Fields_%282nd_nomination%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Once_Upon_a_Time_%28Marty_Stuart_album%29. And it's not simply "my" argument; note that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE||WP:OSE)

Comment: since there are no secondary sources. HW's "poking holes" argument has holes in it itself, as |the existence or non-existence of other, similar articles is immaterial. It is entirely possible for "holes" to exist in a discography. I hope that the closing admin ignores these completely weightless arguments. Ten Pound Hammer, Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|his otters and a clue-bat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: The appropriate notability guideline for this page is , which reads the following
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)