Deletion of Unit (art collective) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Repeating here most of my position on the first AfD: "not finding anything substantial that would indicate critical attention or evaluation of Unit as such. The principals of the group don't appear to have the established notability in their own right which might confer retrospective notability on this group, as suggested above, nor does notability |inherit from putting on exhibitions by say John Latham (artist)|John Latham, much of whose career probably preceded the lifespan of the Unit members. Unless someone can identify actual |coverage of the group itself, this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTINHERITED||:WP:RS||:WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: That sure as hell shouldn't have been a non-admin closure, it should've been relisted until more than two people spoke up.  For my part, my answer to the only Keep voter is that |notability is still not inherited.  I couldn't find anything remotely close to reliable on Google UK, and the sources in the article are garbage: a blog post from a long-defunct webpage, two gallery websites and an unlinked "Artists Newsletter." Fails the GNG by a country mile.  ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)