Deletion of Èrs people

Comment: per . The article depends on just one source. AFAIK, this hypothesis is not further discussed or elaborated in other sources. Therefore, it does meet the criteria for a standalone. As an alternative for deletion, we could merge and redirect somewhere, but then, we also have to check for  and . Not everything that has been proposed somewhere at some time has to be mentioned in WP. There should be at least a certain degree of scholarly impact. However, at the current state of the article, I cannot see that. Even after 10 years, all other citations in the article are about circumstantial information, but not about "Èrs people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:UNDUE||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: per . We all have made mistakes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)