Deletion of Elizabeth Colbert Busch

Comment: ec}} Most definitely not a BLP1E, since she is not a low-profile individual. The more pertinent policy is '''', which is basically about whether this is a biography or a "pseudo-biography". IMHO, it's the former. The article has a well-balanced and well-sourced coverage of her life. Furthermore, I note that falling under  doesn't negate being notable under GNG/ANYBIO; rather, it's the other way around. As for , yes, she doesn't have ''inherent'' notability. However, as one of the most heavily-covered House races in recent American history, I think Colbert Busch definitely falls in the category of losing political candidates who are nonetheless notable.''' —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:POLITICIANS||WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: Passes GNG (which supercedes the Special Guideline for Politicians). Not your ordinary losing candidate for ordinary office, as more than 60,000 page views in the last 30 days indicate. A prime example of a good time to use common sense (spelled |I-A-R) rather than to engage in neener-neener triumphalism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)