Deletion of Snakes in Suits

Comment: meets , there are lots of reviews of ''Snakes'', so it easily meets no. 1 of , have listed some more in the article (thanks to {{u|Penbat}} and {{u|K.e.coffman}} for the above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:BOOKCRIT)

Comment: I'm not very well familiar with this topic but the subject of the article seems to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP and |"Article content does not determine notability", {{u|Sagecandor}}, if "Article appears to function for spam advertisement promotion purposes. Only citation is to a hyperlink to Amazon.com.", do some  editing and get rid of it, done (yaay!, will take a bit longer to enable removal of the cleanup tags:)), one site i check for an indication of notability is WorldCat, if plenty of libraries have copies and/or theres been a lot of editions then there may be some reviews out there ie. with "Snakes" https://www.worldcat.org/title/snakes-in-suits-when-psychopaths-go-to-work/oclc/754988520&referer=brief_results it is in around 750 libraries, a gsearch has brought up some reviews, i've incorporated them into a "Reception" section, 1 or 2 of them may be discounted by some editors as "trade/trivial", but there appears to be enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN||WP:BOLD)

Comment: This article does seem to meet the notability criteria for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)