Deletion of Alex Millmow

Comment: I concur with the nom. And no, I am not the creating editor. Fails . Any article containing the word "Notable" tends to fail in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: per the others above and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per . Edits for tone might be necessary, but that's not an AfD matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per . I found and added to the article four published reviews of one of his books, seven of another, two more each of two more, and a seven-article journal special issue entirely devoted to the second book. That's significantly more my threshold for this notability criterion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per  and  of {{u|David Eppstein}}.  Plenty of reviews now.   issues are much improved over when this was brought to AfD, although sourcing is still weak (apart from the reviews, which are fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:HEY||WP:PROMO)

Comment: I see some progress towards , with two reviews of his books https://www.jstor.org/stable/90022780 https://www.jstor.org/stable/23723619.  Still looks a bit light to me, and I agree citations also look light for fall far short of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)