Deletion of Cassandra Whitehead (3rd nomination)

Comment: Subject wants it gone, and this is not really a key part of the encyclopedia. #Entertainers is a high standard to meet, so there is a case for deletion on regular notability grounds. It is not sufficient just to have press coverage. I encourage the editors voting 'Keep' to state which of these three criteria she satisfies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: If the subject of a BLP is a victim of crime, a child, or if it can be shown that the article is causing damage to them, or if it is impossible to write the article in a neutral manner, I would agree: delete always.  In other cases where the subject requests it (ie: for convenience or personal preference only), we should take it to AFD to demonstrate good faith, but with a deaf ear and judge the article solely on the content and our own guidelines.  In this particular circumstance, the article should be judged with a deaf ear as no claim of damage or victimization is claimed or demonstrated. Based on the content of the article, quality and quantity of sources, and the guidelines on notablity the article should be kept. Enforce  in the strictest manner for contentious content, but keep.  There appears to be no victims in this case, unless we make Wikipedia an "opt out" encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)