Deletion of Comparison of iOS e-book reader software

Comment:  is a valid criticism of the article, as that policy explicitly recommends against including prices. The other major problem with the article is that the lists contain entries with no WP articles of their own. Per the policy on lists, , and also mentioned at the beginning in , these sorts of list-based articles are for organizing and comparing other articles. Thus the products with only external links should probably be deleted from the list. A third problem is that the article doesn't seem to have an intro section or a link to a main article establishing the notability of the topic of IOS e-book readers in general.  But getting rid of prices, deleting unsuitable list entries, and adding an intro are a matter of editing and all are surmountable problems, per . I don't doubt that the topic of IOS e-book readers is notable with many articles discussing features, associated storefronts, etc. A likely notable topic and surmountable problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:NOTCATALOG||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: I see no unfixable problems raised by the nominator nor evident from the article itself, and no problem with having such a comparison article in general. Any NOTCATALOG issues (if there are any; I think it's a stretch to liken this to a product catalog) could be fixed by removing non-notable products (though that is not always necessary so long as there is some secondary source coverage, even if that coverage falls short of meriting the product an article) or removing prices (though comparing free and non-free may also be relevant, and even prices sometimes get commented on in secondary source coverage). That's all for editors to hash out through normal processes, not a deletion concern at all (as is true of most claimed NOT violations I have seen). Finally, the nominator's concern about editors using it to "add credibility" to a particular product is an unpersuasive -type claim, again fixable by NPOV monitoring and editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SUSCEPTIBLE)