Deletion of James-J Walsh (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:GNG is a measure of an article's ''sourceability'', not of anything that the article ''says'' in its ''text''. Of the nine sources here, six are |primary or unreliable sources that cannot assist notability at all, and he isn't the ''subject'' of any of the three remaining |reliable sources — two of them just glancingly namecheck his existence a single time in coverage of something else, and he's the bylined ''author'', not the subject, of the third. This is not how a person gets over GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: not only as per DrStrauss and Bearcat, but also because with political activists and minor politicians, I like to see at least one profile in an independent source, preferably by a journalist in a widely recognized publication; here, however, the closest we get to an article about him is his linked-in profile and a post on teh organization of a political activism organization.  Although it may merely be , Walsh's notability is not validated by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:SIGCOV)