Deletion of Young Pappy (3rd nomination)

Comment: nn as a musician and  situation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: tq|"Google news shows plenty of coverage"}}: except |Wikipedia is not news and news reports are treated as |primary sources. He is known for |one event that was covered briefly in late May but had no |long-term impact. He certainly does not pass the |general notability guideline when he falls under |what Wikipedia is not; hence there are no legitimate claims supporting notability or reason to keep this article in the encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BIO1E||WP:LASTING||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: Since when do we define newspapers and magazines as primary sources. They are and always have been secondary sources. They are the type of  that we seek. You can't just delete something by suddenly changing the rules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: the Vice article and DNA article are not news reporting and are secondary sources based on his musical career and likely would not have been published if he was only known for his shooting so  is passed   refers to trivial events which this is not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: google news shows plenty of coverage, more than enough for  and the Vice and DNA articles are much more than routine reporting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: has significant coverage in reliable sources, there are plenty in Google news search shown above (it isn't necessary to reproduce them)  the Vice article https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/gqmvx7/chicagos-young-pappy-followed-the-gangsta-rap-dream-to-his-grave-626 here is significant coverage about his whole life not just his shooting and states that he was famous before he was killed with over a million and half downloads on soundcloud so  does not apply.Another source about his life https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150610/rogers-park/violent-life-death-of-notorious-rogers-park-rapper-young-pappy here. Previous discussions have hinted at sockpuppetry so hopefully that wont happen here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: fail ,  and  .  notability not found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am surprised so much argument has occurred on this article. It seems quite clearly non-notable to me. Incredibly stupid comments about whether news is reliable based on crap like: "''Academia considers newspaper articles less than fifty years old as primary sources''" seems irrelevant, what is relevant is that this is a  failure, an argument to which no clear rebuttal has been found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: the only significant coverage is due to his death, so  is pretty spot on. Even if those sources go more in-depth into his life, they were still done primarily to cover the single event. There is only in-depth coverage from 2 independent sources, both are primarily about his shooting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)