Deletion of Tony Dane

Comment: I declined a speedy deletion tag on this article, feeling that there was just barely enough in the way of citations, then tried to revise the article to NPOV.  However, in my search for additional material, I found a remarkable lack of anything from a |reliable source; many blog posts and the like indicating what a dimwit the writers feel Mr. Dane is, but nothing concrete.  I believe this is on the verge of notability but upon consideration I think this individual's work is essentially unencyclopedic; he has some notoriety but insufficient notability.  I agree that he doesn't meet  and the coverage is just too sparse to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: The nature of the coverage Dane seems to receive is that the majority of it deals primarily with another topic, and then Dane is quoted or mentioned as an involved campaigner.  I don't really see this as being significant coverage sufficient to satisfy the |general notability guideline, although it's close.  I would also note that even if this article were to be kept, pretty much the only verifiable information about Dane contains examples of him soapboxing about homosexuality, which is going to make it practically impossible for this article to be both well-referenced ''and'' |neutral.&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)