Deletion of Sean Howard (American webcomic artist)

Comment: per , , whichever you prefer.  No truly reliable sources, and the official site has Alexa ranking 283,594 currently
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:WEB)

Comment: It should be noted that the subject's desire to ''not'' have an article on Wikipedia is irrelevant as are his views on the project and his willingness to be a resource for an article (his own statements would constitute |original research).  The sources provided in the article don't qualify as |reliable sources, but I imagine one could find |verifiable information to base an article on.  It's not there right now, so this probably be deleted under , but with no predjudice against recreation at a later date if sources are found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: The previous deletion nominations were pre-, so the arguments for keeping from those discussions don't carry much weight.  The article doesn't meet , so just delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BIO)

Comment: per , , , etc., but this AfD is certainly a pain to wade through... &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:WEB||WP:V)

Comment: insufficient reliable sources for verifiably neutral coverage, significant evidence that past coverage has been anything but neutral as a result.   says we must take a conservative approach, in this case the prudent thing to do is give up and wait until he is more famous.  The more articles like this I see the more persuaded I am by the "no first biographies" proposal.  That proposal is not yet policy, but this article goes a good way to arguing why it should be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)