Deletion of Chowdhry Girdhari Lal

Comment: Obviously passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: senior government politician passes , thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Cabinet minister at the state level, long-serving member of a state legislature, member of a national parliament, any one of which would be a clear pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: Yes, the article needs some improvement — but the subject is explicitly verified by the existing sources as having held a role that confers an automatic pass of  #1. For people who held office 35 years ago, the potential references won't Google well and will have to be extracted from archival sources like newspaper microfilms or books — but we do not have a rule that our sources have to be directly web-accessible, and we ''are'' allowed to cite print-only sourcing. We ultimately judge notability based on the ''existence'' of suitable sourcing to improve it with rather than the current quality of the article — so if a person verifiably passes our subject-specific inclusion criteria for politicians, which he does, then we do not delete the article just for not already being in better shape than it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: ping|Sheldybett}} the second reference indicates that the subject served as an elected member of the :Lok Sabha and occupied various positions in the government of :Uttar Pradesh, either of which would appear sufficient to satisfy the first point of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NPOL)

Comment: In the absence of any expansion on the failed rationale following my query to the nominator above, then the subject's verified career fits the  presumed notability criterion. (Is an early  close appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NPOL||:WP:SNOW)