Deletion of Camille Bonora

Comment: I believe that she does meet , having had "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" - the article lists multiple notable films and shows, over at least an 11 year period (1985-1996). - and  specifically includes voice actors, which presumably can be extended to puppeteers/voice actors. She probably also meets #2 "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." I don't see how #2 is to be established without reference to magazines and websites related to the shows or the person. I also found this book, ''For Such a Time as This: Kampouris and Kairos'' https://books.google.com.au/books?id=DkJtDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22Camille+Bonora%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s (which I see another editor found), which will not count to establish notability as it was written by an editor of ''Kairos'', but does have information on Bonora's childhood and career. My understanding of the Additional notability criteria is that they exist because in some fields there is not likely to be SIGCOV of the person, and therefore criteria are established for deciding whether someone in those fields is notable. Someone who was a puppeteer/voice actor should surely be assessed against 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:NACTOR||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: and  per nom.  Really a fourth deletion discussion shouldn't be needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: She clearly has performed in non-trivial roles in a number of notable movies and television shows. The article is hardly great, but it passes , and it getting deleted repeatedly is not going to help it grow. I think it keeps getting recreated because she's clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)