Deletion of NuttX RTOS

Comment: Article fails .  To answer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Note that I am ignoring the blatant |meatpuppetry that's occuring above) - I do not at all care about the merits of this OS, and Wikipedia does not either when considering its notability. A http://www.google.com/search?q=NuttX+RTOS&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=NuttX+RTOS&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=z4B&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=imvns&ei=tsu2T7rjNa6OigK7iLSXBw&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=283bbbfd66ef86be&biw=1280&bih=921 Google search leads very few third-party ''reliable'' sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT)

Comment: Just to clarify something http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.nuttx/1325 said here, this discussion is not exactly about "collecting opinions" about NuttX RTOS, but rather how it does or does not meet the notability guidelines.  As it says above the editing window, valid arguments Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates|citing relevant guidelines will be given more weight than unsupported statements.  Wikipedia has specific guidelines such as  and  for determining the notability of each and every article, and if you want the article kept then the best way to do that is to look for references that can help satisfy  at the minimum; giving your opinion of how great the software is isn't really going to help
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)