Deletion of Inauguration of Donald Trump protests

Comment: somewhere per  and . It might be that the protests have long lasting political significance that resonates for a lengthy period of time, but we can't say that ''yet
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: unless someone wishes to rewrite it as a prose article.  It won't be me, as the amount of coverage we've already given to a Trump presidency '''which only started today''' is absolutely ridiculous when compared to the countless notable events that we don't acknowledge whatsoever or only provide trivial coverage and for which an abundance of sources have long existed.  Read: what finer points of "|Wikipedia is not a newspaper" are y'all disputing by engaging in all this activity?  In addition to , the content I'm looking at right now also violates  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I agree that the 2017 Women's March deserves its own article and merging this one there simply muddies the water for both. They are two separate things. This article encompasses much more than just the women's events and simply needs to be expanded to cover all the related areas. But there is no question that this article's events are notable and frankly, given the context, historic. So article easily passes (E) generally; and more specifically: , ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COVERAGE||WP:DIVERSE||WP:LASTING||WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: per other editr's rational who voted merge, especially Ritchie333's great comment. Too soon to tell the consequences of this, but at the moment is non-notable and in fact seems to violate 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: and maybe '''Merge''' content) #Closeapple20170122|(but see self-reply) to Protests against Donald Trump#Inauguration protests or nearby in the same article (also noting that there is a summary at Inauguration of Donald Trump#Protests for inauguration-specific protests).  Unless there are protests that  describe as attempting to disqualify Trump from actually being sworn in, or that  establish as an effective boycott or disruption of the inauguration, there's no real distinction between protests before, on the day, or after January 20.  The boycott by public officials is already covered at Inauguration of Donald Trump#Representatives boycotting and any others that happen to involve the actual inauguration can be covered at Inauguration of Donald Trump#Protests.  Other demonstrations are just surrounding the inauguration because it's a milestone day with a lot of attention, not because the participants really thought America should cancel a January 20 swearing-in; these surrounding demonstrations can be covered in chronological or other order in Protests against Donald Trump
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: Yet more over the top coverage of all things anti-Trump. Purely run of the mill protests that actually fell far short of expectations. None of these protests individually or collectively merit their own article. Huge problems with , NOTNEWS and DUE. This looks like a WP:CONTENTFORK from Protests against Donald Trump and is arguably a good candidate for CSD per A-10
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:10YT)