Deletion of IMSCF Syndrome (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article is trivia (it's stated that it is a non-academic term) and it is informal term in Pilippines' society per Chris'. So it's better to be merged as one section in Ethnic groups in the Philippines provided with |reliable sources. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I reject the idea that "non-existant pheonomenons", or any other ideas which individual editors may disagree with, even ones proven false (ie hoaxes), are not allowed on WP, since it's been made abundantly clear in  (with the support of ) that the threshold for inclusion is notability--especially when established with multiple independent reliable sources. Given that, I think from the cursory searches that the term is a neologism that might pass the threshold of  in the future. But it's not there yet, and even if it were there it would require a rewrite because of  issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: needs |independent sources to prove that this term is notable, unverifiable, non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)