Deletion of Irlam (1813 ship)

Comment: hi {{u|Fram}}, 1st thanks for the interesting afd (i have added it to my "intersting afds" on my userpage), i especially like the bit about  and Warning! - some bias is about to show{{=)}} look forward to you tackling  the elephant in the room - the thousands of non-descript/unknown (outside their sport sphere anyway) sports people article one-liner stubbies, yes i know we have  with its numerous sngs but it could be argued that they have only developed due to good lobbying and the large no. of sports mad editors out there in wikiland, do we really need to know John Clarke (satirist)#Early life and career|who the farnarkeling champion was (probably, yes:)) or that so and so, a insert sport name played one game for the insert team name in insert year? i am not a ships person but found the information about the Irlams very interesting (these are the sorts of articles that make wp such a fascinating place), but i  would never had read about them if it wasn't for your afd so a 2nd thanks:), anyhoo enough waffling, with the improvements made, including extra |sources added, by above editors it is a '''keep''' from me as meeting . ps. i am not a ships project person so it has now gone beyond the realm of "local consensus
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:LOCALCONSENSUS||WP:NSPORT||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:SHIPS does indeed hold that ships over 100'/100 tons (undefined) are generally notable enough to sustain an article. That said, it must still be demonstrated that  must be met and it is recognised that the further back in time one goes, the harder it is to meet GNG. It is for this reason that I have not linked many of the entries in shipwreck lists of the era covered by this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not a ship person, but I think this clearly meets  based on a review of the sources. I think it's proper to question this, but ships will always be easier to source due to the fact records were kept so well about them, and I have no problem with this; I also think the sources are sufficiently independent of each other
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)