Deletion of Comparison of vampire traits

Comment: as maintainable, discriminate, verifiable, encyclopedic, well-defined, objective, unoriginal research that is consistent with what Wikipedia is.  Moreover, calling something "|cruft" is never a valid reason for deletion.  I am, however, not opposed to it being merged as well and in turn redirected with edit history intact, but clearly no reason to redlink.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: quick fast and in a hurry - pure  that violates both  and . Throwing out some references to support individual elements does not make it anything else. Wikipedia is not for editorial self-publication in prose or chart form. Vampires as a topic has an article and is notable, this is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NOT)

Comment: While interesting and useful to vampire fans, it is riginal research and belongs on a vampire website or blog not WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: as an extreme case of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)