Deletion of The Self-Sufficient-ish Bible

Comment: added book reviews from the Bristol Post and The Times.  Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: another waste of time for afd editors of a notable book that is neither part of a walled garden nor of self-promotion, meets  with numerous reviews in |reliable sources that are listed in the article, a perfunctory  would have found these
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:RS||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per . This book has received reviews from publications including ''Library Journal'', ''Resource Magazine'', ''Publishers Weekly'', ''Bristol Post'', and ''The Times'' (all cited in the article). This meets  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:BOOKCRIT)

Comment: This article is not self-promotion, as it was not created and has not been edited by the subject of the article or anyone with a personal connection to the author of the book. This article also does not fit Wikipedia's definition of a walled garden. (See Wikipedia:Walled garden and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:SELFPROMOTE)