Deletion of Marco Bove

Comment: It is not necessary to have major media coverage for demonstrating academic notability under , but there is insufficient evidence of academic notability here. No significant academic honors or awards listed and the citation rates are not high, especially for an active experimental field like neuroscience. GoogleScholar gives a top citation hit of 44, with an h-index of around 12http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Marco%20Bove%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws. Similar results in WebOfScience. This is OK but certainly not above average. I do not see any other claims to notability mentioned in the article. Assisting with a textbook written by somebody else does not qualify. Also, in the staff directory of the Department of Experimental Medicine at the University of Genoa he is listed as an Assistant Professorhttp://www.dimes-unige.net/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=56 not an Associate Professor as the article says. It is also not clear if he still holds an academic position anywhere (the article uses past tense in relation to the University of Genoa position). Does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)