Deletion of Alabama Baptist State Board of Missions

Comment: These are independent organizations that are members of a national association, not branches of the national organization. There seems to be plenty to be said about each: history, membership, churches, schools, missions, controversies etc.  Some of the articles establish notability by citing sources, the others could easily be expanded and improved to show notability. E.g. http://www.google.ca/search?num=100&hl=en&q=%22Arizona%20Southern%20Baptist%20Convention%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1,bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=np this book search for the Arizona organization. We should not delete articles on subjects that are clearly notable just because the article does not yet include citations to prove notability. Better to add content and citations than nominate for deletion. . Articles for other state Baptist conventions, if notable (most probably are), could be created or restored, but should have significant content and citations so they are of value to the reader
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The "individual chapters/divisions..." language of  does not apply as these are affiliated, but distinct/independent groups from each other and the Southern Baptist Convention. As I noted above in response to Phantomsteve, it seems each, or at least most, on their own meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CLUB||WP:ORG)