Deletion of BulletML

Comment: Lacks |significant coverage from standard/specialized searches and Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap|redirects are cheap. (not Help:Watchlist|watching, please {{tl|ping
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: it's not easy, but I was able to find some coverage. (e.g. https://www.google.ru/books/edition/Real_Wars_on_Virtual_Battlefields/tp5LCgAAQBAJ?hl=ru&gbpv=1&dq=%22BulletML%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA111&printsec=frontcover 1 http://micsymposium.org/mics2012/submissions/mics2012_submission_44.pdf 2) enough where I think there's a real possibility that sufficient sources can be found. And if someone wanted to make a properly attributed copy to sandbox and histmerge back later once the sourcing is satisfactory I think that would be fine. There's also  to consider so content may be best expanded as part of an existing article.{{pb}}I don't see any reason to hide the existing history, in fact I '''oppose''' doing so for the reasons given. It won't prevent bad restorations, and the appropriate way to stop those is by partially-blocking users who insist on making them after being warned not to, or if need be, by protecting the page, though with one recreation over an entire decade+ that seems unlikely to be necessary. What it will prevent is people using the history to merge the information elsewhere or potentially build an article off of, so all-in-all hiding the history is a net negative.{{pb}}Presumably Special:Contributions/86.155.25.31|86.155.25.31 will be done with their merger after a week. If not, leave a friendly note explaining how to use page histories. Special:Contributions/31.41.45.190|31.41.45.190
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)