Deletion of Sanjay Razdan (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: WP:ANYBIO subject received many awards and has made a widely recognized contribution in his field. . As to the votes to delete because the article needs a rewrite...
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: WOW, a lot has happened here since I was on Holidays. Well, it's god to see that a lot of people are interested in this page because the other in the lists are hardly voted and same happened to the first nomination that I just checked. Anyway, based of  it clearly says '''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.''' So, if this is not notable I guess half of the articles on Wikipedia should be deleted. I am impressed from the profiles of people participated here and disappointed that notability is based on personal opinions as someone who failed to get the article down came again with a force. This Dr is well known in the field and helped 1000s of people to fight cancer and diseases, received awards, peer review journals, publications widely used in the medical field. and if this DR is not notable based on references then these Henry Dalton, Donald L. Custis and many other like these must be deleted as they lack references. So, please better decide if these are policies or something else. And if there are references in question like someone mentioned above is a press or something you can remove. I was creating a page for a second DR who is helping humanity but I think I should not or better I'll ask in TEA HOUSE before creating a new one because what I'm raeding on  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: I tried, but can't find  per efore.  I would love to improve the article away from the precipice.  He seems to be notable in his world (and maybe common usage) {{mdash}} he seems to have good credentials, but not provably notable per  in Wikipedia.  We are trying to build an encyclopædia, and those are the rules
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:B||WP:GNG)