Deletion of Francisco D'Agostino (2nd nomination)

Comment: Satisfies . I fail to see how thee text violates : the lawsuits are described in a neutral form. However I would suggest to strike them out, because D'Agostino is an occasional part of it, i.e, they are not against him directly (at least this is not seen from the article text
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP)

Comment: this is an attack piece, and violates  policy. Note that the alleged accusations of corruption/graft were dismissed by a judge, see http://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-dismisses-racketeering-claims-against-venezuelan-businessmen-1408489055 ''Judge Dismisses Racketeering Claims Against Venezuelan Businessmen'' in WSJ. ''Pan caliente'', a Venezuelan (opposition-leaning mews site of unclear authorship/editorial control/fact checking diligence), talks about his house in Aruba (see link by Vrac) to put him in a bad light, but Wikipedia is not a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:SOAPBOX)