Deletion of Ardesta

Comment: I'm concerned with the lack of  for non-trivial coverage as well. It's also troubling that this company keeps referring to itself as a leader. If it is a leader, and I do not think it is, some secondary source would say so. If such sources can be brought to bear, I would happily reconsider my "delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Does not meet .  I don't see any substantial coverage of this company by secondary sources.  Plenty of trivial mentions (article about Company X mentions that Ardesta is an investor in Company X), but that's about all I see as far as secondary sources go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per nom. Also, as written, fails  and seems a bit |spammy. Needs a serious rewrite. Might have been ''weak keep'', but it has been 4 days since nom, and nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:SPAM)