Deletion of David Keyes

Comment: per , because "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". He's written for a stellar list of publications, has been widely covered, and has got results. Former versions of the article had a good of praise for his work, which was added and then removed by the same SPA. I agree that we don't need the praise just to show that he's notable. Can't we just have an article about his activities? –&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Shame was used as an  but still clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:advert)