Deletion of DDRUK (3rd nomination)

Comment: Per Teancum's comments and the fact that a Google Test reveals a pretty good degree of popular reference and thus a very crude demonstration of importance. Obviously that's not saying much, but I'm usually willing to give something that fails the |Negative test a second look at least. If there has been participation with the Expos as claimed, then this seems fairly notable to me. Some of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/DDRUK pages linked to DDRUK also make claims that if true seem to be potentially notable. Finally it should be noted that several of the "broken links" are either still up under different addresses or are available via WayBack Machine. In fact, I'll go ahead and fix those links now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)

Comment: This website fails  and, more broadly, . http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-96732733.html This is the most promising potential reference that a Google News search turned up &ndash; a short take in a British newspaper in which DDRUK.com was selected as "Website of the Day." http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ddruk.com Alexa rank is approximately 682,000, for what it's worth. All things considered, the subject falls below our bar for inclusion when it comes to websites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:N)