Deletion of List of video games in development

Comment: mdash; The page seems quite maintainable to me. Crystal doesn't apply, as we have citations for each. Directory similarly I would say doesn't apply, based on the fact that these are not minor games (if you must, they're notable, which should deflect Directory as a reason for deletion). NOTNEWS is for events already happened; there are many established cases where already known events that will happen have articles. As for the category reason given, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: The list makes sense as a supplement to :Category:Upcoming video games. The number of announced notable games in development is quite limited and the information is easily verifiable through the games' pages and major gaming sites like http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?type=games&platform=1029&mode=all&sort=release&dlx_type=all&sortdir=asc&official=all Gamespot. From : ''Lists and categories are synergistic — the benefits of their redundancy are covered in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:CLN)

Comment: The argument 'impossible to maintain' has never meant anything to me before. Probably another list such as this was proposed for deletion before, and editors have been parroting that phrase since without knowing what it really means. This is the definition of a time sink of dubious benefit. That said, maintenance, completeness, etc, are issues that are the privilege of mainspace editors and contributors to the discussion page, where AfD contributors must restrict their arguments to  and its attendant arguments. As long as there are editors who find this worth the time, and until maintenance can be definitely shown to be a problem, then there are no reasons to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELETION)