Deletion of Salmat

Comment: poor article content is not a valid deletion reason. This company clearly meets  as is evidenced by http://newsstore.fairfax.com.au/apps/newsSearch.ac?page=1&sy=nstore&sp=nrm&so=relevance&dt=selectRange&kw=salmat&dr=entire&pb=all_ffx&rc=10&sfx=headline&sfx=text&submit=Search numerous articles in the Fairfax Media publications. There are over 8,000 mentions of the company in Factiva over 30 years. A search of EBSCOhost's Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre yields over 400 results. Obviously not all of these results are significant coverage but there are many many examples
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets , per a review of the sources provided above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: this is nothing more than an advert for a privately-held, non-publicly-traded corporation. |We are not a free webhost
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWEBHOST)

Comment: by  Shad in Net   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)