Deletion of UFC 6

Comment: Per , this event determined the champion of a top league so it satisfies the notability guideline. Additionally, this appears to be a  nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:POINT)

Comment: This is an obvious y nomination. Portillo actually disagrees with deleting these articles. He's only doing it out of frustration to make a point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 31
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: Only |routine |primary news reports, fails the  policy as it fails as an event to demonstrate enduring notability. No objection to userfication to allow for a Merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:PRIMARYNEWS||WP:NOT)

Comment: The article itself is no different than |routine coverage as there is nothing to indicate historical significance or at least a significant lasting effect of the event and it falls into WP:!|what Wikipedia is not as it is at best a |news report and the topic does not seem to meet the exception criteria of  with no sanctioning body or league to presume that it is inherently notable. There are two sources in the article that provide in-depth coverage, which almost shows historical significance, but, in my opinion, still not enough to justify a stand alone-article. I favor a merge, but I don't see a viable target since the article 1995 in UFC events doesn't exist yet, so I cannot suggest one
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:SPORTSEVENT)