Deletion of Mona Johannesson

Comment: ec):  The only debate in this AfD is whether the coverage is sufficient enough to meet .  I am inclined to think it is.  I am not surprised to see that editors like LibStar and Starblind disagree, while RAN and Dream Focus think she is sufficiently notable.  In a case like Johannesson it often comes down to a judgment call and how hard we look, and the outcomes in these AfDs are not always consistent.  The oft-repeated claim that she is/was the next Kate Mosshttp://forums.thefashionspot.com/f52/mona-johannesson-december-2004-march-2010-a-11597.html is somewhat hyperbole, but not completely something to disregard.  Numerous magazine covers http://www.magxone.com/elle/mona-johannesson-elle-sweden-november-2009/http://www.bloginity.com/blog/2010/07/28/mona-johannesson-covers-august-issue-of-elle-sweden/ (numerous covers of Elle Sweden), and spreads http://fashiongonerogue.com/mona-johannesson-jimmy-backius-fashion-tales-fall-2010/ (warning: tasteful nudity), and other references ( http://blogg.expressen.se/modebloggen/entry.jsp?messid=90561 - swedish columnist in Expressen refers to her as "one of our most successful models", see "att Mona är en av våra mest framgångsrika modeller"; another Expressen article (Feb 11, 2007) http://www.expressen.se/1.354127 says she is one of the top models in Sweden ("Mona Johannesson, 18, segrat. - Mona har blivit väldigt stor" - basically, she has triumphed, she has become big); another Expressen blurb lists her as third sexiest swedish woman (calling her a supermodel) http://www.expressen.se/1.224816; Aftonbladet lists her 4th of Sweden's top models http://www.aftonbladet.se/sofismode/article6126864.ab (Nov. 15, 2009); Aftonbladet July 25, 2006 piece http://www.aftonbladet.se/nojesbladet/klick/article395804.ab?teaser=true (full text behind pay wall, its the "Att vara" article); Svenska Dagbladet article (October 5, 2008) lists her as one of four most sought-after Swedish models, etc.  Thus we can safely conclude she's not just another run of the mill model.  (Note these are three of Swedish's highest circulation papers, I searched their archives.)  This AfD is not unlike Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigmund Borgundvåg, its more difficult to find scandanavian sources because they don't all seem to be on google.  But in the end, I think the coverage is sufficient that deletion would not benefit the project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)