Deletion of Jewish Motorcyclists Alliance

Comment: http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-19176019_ITM Several http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-18150454_ITM sources http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-106748591.html are http://www.chattanoogan.com/articles/article_84591.asp available http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-109780738.html for http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-15129876_ITM the http://www.jewishjournal.com/home/preview.php?id=15864 subject.   Also, nominator's rationale is inherently flawed.  See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTBIGENOUGH)

Comment: unless |citations from |reliable sources are added to the article to comply with the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: per  and . A Google News search indicates that JMA has enough '''high quality''' Google hits from  to satisfy . A simple number of ghits is not a valid test of otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GHITS||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per sources found by Celarnor.  There's no "If sources aren't yet placed in the article, then those sources don't exist and the article must be deleted" clause of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)