Deletion of Vonage (2nd nomination)

Comment: Please note that there is some kind of mystery glitch affecting how this AfD is displaying at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 25. Anyway, as Chrisw80 says, it's obviously a notable company. As for the assorted issues with the article, fD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Honestly, this AfD is pretty absurd.  This is a multi-national corporation with extensive coverage in the media.  There are '''at least''' fifteen to twenty references with ''comprehensive'' coverage of Vonage on a variety of topics (more than thirty sources from reliable sources).  How does this equate to non-notable??  This clearly meets  and .  Yes, the article has a lot of problems, but it can be salvaged without a rewrite - I've already made a small variety of changes to help things along a bit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)