Deletion of Xiklab Digital

Comment: A quick Google search returns 6,940 results only, which is already an indicator that it's very likely to fail  and . Even the sources in the article are mostly promotional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: This seems like a pretty run of the mill article about a pretty run of the mill company that is just going about its business. Which is reflected in the fact that the article is just made up of "they merged with another and expanded." Both things are extremely trivial and not notable. Companies merge and expand. Its what they do and 99% of the time there's nothing particularly special about it, but especially not in this case. "Merge and expand" seem to be what all the sources are about also. Which means they do not establish anything about the company. Except that it exists. So, in no way does the article pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: The article needs to be trimmed down, notably merging or removing the pre-Xiklab content. However, most of the sources in the article are reliable, including https://www.adobomagazine.com/uncategorized/brand-business-snapworx-digital-and-mobext-inc-introduce-xiklab-a-new-digital-creative-agency-in-the-philippines/, https://www.brandinginasia.com/the-philippines-xiklab-digital-launches-operations-in-singapore-and-myanmar/ and https://news.abs-cbn.com/ancx/culture/spotlight/08/07/19/this-new-super-agency-sees-digital-marketing-as-the-way-of-tomorrow. That said, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Impressive client list, but that doesn’t make them notable. I don’t see anything that isn’t just an account of normal agency life per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)