Deletion of Interpretations of Fight Club

Comment: with the recommendation that it be tweaked to avoid the unintentional negative appearance (that could be combated in the meantime by perhaps moving the largely neutral section "Genre classifications" to the beginning of the article). ''Fight Club'' is a film that has been taught, analysed and studied in http://i31.tinypic.com/1056xyg.jpg such depth that this is certainly a notable topic, and a comprehensive "Interpretations of..." section would not fit within the parent article; therefore I agree that |summary style applies here. The nominator points to Fight Club (film)#Themes, but that section and this article cover almost entirely different ground, so there is little or no redundancy here.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: because the article is a sub-article of Fight Club (film).  The main article is large in size, and if there was an "Interpretations" section with its various subsections, it would overwhelm everything else in the article.  Per , a sub-article about the academic interpretations of ''Fight Club'' was created.  It is still a work in progress, as evidenced by all the academic material in the "Interpretations of Fight Club#Further reading|Further reading" section.  If there are NPOV concerns, we can discuss them on the article's talk page, but it is not a reason for deletion.  (For what it's worth, I happen to like the film, so these sections weren't added to spite it... the sources being reliable and credible, the commentary is worth reporting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)