Deletion of MIRCStats

Comment: I've rewritten and expanded this article and it now makes a '''firm assertion of notability'''. It now contains more than enough references to satisfy , including a college textbook:{{cite book| last1 = Gaise| first1 = Ted J
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: In spite of the earlier assurances, I wasn't able to find any reliable sources with nontrivial coverage. None of the references provided on MIRCStats help to establish notability. ''"A Guide to Conducting Online Research"'', viewable through Amazonhttp://www.amazon.com/Guide-Conducting-Online-Research/dp/1412922909 does '''not''' seem to include any references to MIRCStats.  Software depositories like http://download.cnet.com/mIRCStats/3000-2150_4-10021366.html CNET only offer trivial program descriptions and cannot possibly be considered |reliable sources indicative of |notability. Several Google searches didn't reveal any in-depth program reviews or other sources of significant coverage. http://books.google.com/books?id=5xXUrOTW3l8C&pg=PA404&vq=mircstats&dq=%22mircstats%22 This book cannot possibly be counted as a valid source (in fact, I think it should be banned as a reference), since, according to its own http://books.google.com/books?id=5xXUrOTW3l8C&pg=PP12&vq=%22non-conventional%22+OR+%22modern+slang%22+OR+%22wikipedia%22 preface, its review of MiRCStats was taken directly from Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)