Deletion of Natalee Holloway (2nd nomination)

Comment: She was an ordinary high school senior, and at the time of her disappearance utterly failed to satisfy . She was no more notable that millions of other teenagers. Her disappearance and the relentless coverage by TV news channels is a striking example and an index case of the Missing white woman syndrome. The disappearance has attracted prolonged and recurring news coverage in multiple reliable sources, apparently because her picture on the front page of a newspaper improves circulation, and her image on TV improves ratings
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: and '''move''' to Disappearance of Natalee Holloway per other such cases as Disappearance of Madeleine McCann in which the person is not notable for anything in their life, only their disappearance. There are 96 citations in the article. Easily passes  and does not fail OT#NEWS due to apparent long term coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: This obviously should be kept per . As to the issue of moving/renaming it appears that's already been discussed and the consensus was to keep it under this title. So I think this should just be closed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per . There is unquestionably a bevy of sources that could be drawn from for this article - independent, reliable sources. Heck, the article has 94 of them as it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: AuburnPilot's statement that this article has very little biographical information is exactly why this article has to go per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: since the subject is clearly notable per  and . No need to change the article title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)