Deletion of Dragonmage (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per TTN, the original nom, and I agree that comic book editors have a serious misunderstanding of the notability criteria. You can have as many  sources as you want, but without  sources, the article cannot be notable. The DC and Marvel Wikias are where this content should be located
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: WP:FICTION says that fictional characters must meet  - this character does not have significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources - two of the reference links in the article are to the Wikipedia article Legion of Super-Heroes which is circular sourcing and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source - no evidence of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think it's been demonstrated above that this article meets the . Because of this, a deletion would be unusual, and I'm not sure what basis this would be for doing that. (A lof the "votes" above were made before the new refs were found.) Granted, the refs ''in the article now'' are very poor. But that is not a reason for deleting an article and never has been
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As the nomination does not provide a -REASON|reason to delete and so there's no case to answer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)