Deletion of Wet floor signs

Comment: After the humor is removed, there will be an appropriate stub which can be expanded with the available reliable sources. The present article is full of nonsense, but these signs satisfy  on the basis of multiple reliable and independent sources with substantial coverage. Just do a Google book search for "wet floor sign". Most books on managing restaurants http://books.google.com/books?id=p8iG_u9bp9YC&pg=PA219&dq=%22wet+floor+sign%22&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=zrXVV2ylr_WYqfHmesNaVBuy-Zk and other property as well as on patient care http://books.google.com/books?id=DMjexUibId0C&pg=PA81&dq=%22wet+floor+sign%22&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=BSh1vRnAfDRx1a8hLQhtWXr_5Kw include at least the instruction to place one whenever there is a spill or a floor is mopped. Many legal textbooks discuss the clear negligence of failure to place one of these leading to a slip and fall lawsuit http://books.google.com/books?id=aP8_9VFJTEgC&q=%22wet+floor+sign%22&dq=%22wet+floor+sign%22&lr=&as_brr=0&pgis=1 "Business Law and the Legal Environment" by Ronald Aberdeen Anderson (1999) p 163 A Google News search shows scads of legal cases, starting in the 1980's, about accidents resulting from the omission of these signs http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22wet+floor+sign%22 A book on warning signs contains over 130 words about the "wet floor sign": its effectiveness draws upon implicit knowledge in the average person that such a floor will present a slipping hazard, so that additional information may be omitted http://books.google.com/books?id=qSk7ytVDvWgC&pg=PA420&dq=%22wet+floor+sign%22&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=0OzV5eD3kRkTJu5G_c30yZCqzTk#PPA420,M1  “Handbook of Warnings” by Michael S. Wogalter, p420, (2006). In sum, stub the article, but do not delete it. Reliable sources exist to create a short encyclopedic article, which might later be expanded to discuss the litigious climate of the late 20th century which resulted in the ubiquity of these little bilingual signs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The topic is http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22wet+floor%22+sign+-patent&hl=en&lr=&start=10&sa=N notable and scholarly.  If the article is currently |imperfect then we improve it.  Deletion is not an improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)