Deletion of Lists of cricket records

Comment: Meets  as a useful navigational aid to various cricket records list articles. For example, this list article received https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-90&pages=Lists_of_cricket_records 2,763 page views in the last 90 days, whereas :Category:Cricket-related lists has only received https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-90&pages=Category:Cricket-related_lists 256 page views in the last 90 days. As such, this article is more useful for Wikipedia's |readers compared to the category page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:READER)

Comment: the nomination statement is such an utterly clueless misunderstanding of  but I daresay speedy criteria apply here. But yes keep, nonetheless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: per  categories and lists go hand-in-hand.  This is a table of contacts rather than an article, and serves as a collection of all the pages in one place to aid navigation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)