Deletion of Matthew Kingshott

Comment: While there may be a lot of mentions of this project none are that significant and would not yet (at first look) be enough for me for the |future film so he doesn't satisfy  as a film writer. The mentions of him in the above links I have access to are of the extremely trivial nature so lacks coverage for . The subject is not recieving the coverage, the project is. That the article has the potential to improve is |crystal ball thinking and that is an #CRYSTAL|argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Also vioaltes OT, Wikipedia is |not a means of promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:ENT||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:ATA||WP:NOT||WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: As I see no evidence that its author User:ThePenguin1 is either Matthew Kingshott or anyone attached to the Kingshot film, I do not see this short, encyclopedic, and sourced article as being a violation of |WP:NOT.  That said however, the article and topic are simply 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:TOOSOON)