Deletion of Sherman Bergman (2nd nomination)

Comment: FranciscoFWPerez, the requirements for determining kickboxers' notability are very clear and very specific and you have never addressed them. See them at . Voters have repeatedly said, the subject does not meet these requirements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NKICK)

Comment: Subject does not meet the notability criteria for boxers or kickboxers. Notability is not inherited from others. Linking this article to everything you can find about anyone he ever fought (amateur or pro, boxer or kickboxer) does not show he meets  since there is a lack of significant independent coverage about him. Routine sports coverage also does not count towards showing notability. He doesn't meet any SNG or GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Does not meet |established notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NKICK)

Comment: doesn't pass , and fails the criteria for kickboxers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article's main claims to notability seems to be who he competed against or was a sparring partner of, but notability isn't inherited.  There's no evidence that he meets the notability criteria for kickboxers, boxers, or actors.  Lots of passing mentions are insufficient to show notability via 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I respect the work you've put into this BLP and appreciate your willingness to improve it. But as you noted, it still only achieves N through the subject's kickboxing career. But it fails there, per . Also, having fight results published; knocking down Van Damme, only to still lose in the first round; or being the subject of a single human interest write up in the local newspaper, don't inherently confer notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NKICK)