Deletion of Poblacion 1, Calamba

Comment: Article is more than 5 years old and is still barely a directory of things, which Wikipedia is not (). It's hard to find possible sources for this article that would make it pass  because it is a generic small barangay and it even has a generic name (Poblacion 1), which is shared with many other barangays in other cities and municipalities in the country. Any statistical info about this barangay can be up-merged into the parent city article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom. {{small|(To anyone who plans to defend this article:  doesn't guarantee notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: to Calamba, Laguna: Per . Not all Barangays are notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: redirect'''. As noted above, this article is essentially  and there is unlikely to be much sourcing. These administrative divisions  are so numerous and obscure that the Philippine Government Statistics Bureau at the end of 2020 updated the name of a barangay whose name had been changed in 1989https://psa.gov.ph/classification/psgc/?q=psgc. While not identical, this article is similar in its content (small urban sub-division) and lack of sourcing to those considered in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ağcakent, Aziziye. I believe the resolution reached there, of redirecting with the possibility of reopening if sources can be gathered showing notability, works well in this situation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)