Deletion of List of fictional models

Comment: not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. Appears to be  or otherwise not useful to readers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: or '''move to draft/userspace''' at the very least. Come on, guys. This article is blatantly unfinished, contains only ''eight'' entries, of which only two have pages. I know  is generally not an acceptable rationale, but I'll be happy to go with  here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:TNT)

Comment: Nomination 2.5 hours since creation, 2 hours since last edit, is just entirely poor manners.  , , and  all seem to apply in some form to this situation.  In other words, when the nominator is going to jump the gun like that, I expect the burden of proof to be on him or her that such an article is ''never'' potentially encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:CHANCE||WP:DEMOLISH)