Deletion of Chicks on the Right

Comment: without prejudice against recreation of a '''redirect''' after the history is deleted first to prevent reversion warring. This is referenced almost entirely to content where they're the ''authors'' rather than the ''subjects'' — but as I explained above, that's not how you make people notable enough for Wikipedia: you make people notable enough for Wikipedia by showing that they've been the ''subject'' of reliable source coverage written by other ''people''. This is, of course, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can actually reference them over  ''properly'' — but Twitter tweets and YouTube clips and sources where they're ''doing'' the writing or speaking isn't how you get them over the bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: aside from the SPAs above, nothing pushes this any closer to meeting the |general notability guidelines. Pretty much everything is either not significant coverage or is not secondary. Personally, I find the publication making several articles about this AfD to show that they have nothing better to comment on. Best Wishes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)