Deletion of Ben George

Comment: The  argument is an interesting one, but I think it's ultimately just a  argument since he only played one professional game. Almost all professional footballers are by their nature routine, and  exists to help us sort out what routine is important and what routine isn't important, because almost if not all professional footballers receives media coverage throughout their career, and George is no different - he was discussed in the media throughout his career, even though most of it was in the lower leagues, and played 90 minutes in a League One match. Not all of the coverage he received is in the article, though admittedly not everything in the article is significant, like his goal in this friendly: https://www.gillinghamfootballclub.com/news/2013/july/league-one-news2/. Still I think he does satisfy 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  as subject has played in a fully-professional league.  Whether  is met is neither here nor there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: has enough coverage for  as identified in this discussion in addition to , regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: passes  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: meets ; needs improving, not deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Passes . Nom should have done research to see if he was notable or not before wasting all our time when he was, by his own admission, "not sure if the person is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Where is the rest of his career? I feel  needs to be taken into account here first and foremost, simply only ever playing one football league game and then doing nothing else fails  regardless of passing NFootball, I would say delete if there is no career here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: the real question is not if the article passes NFOOTY (btw ''"Players who have played in a competitive game between two teams from fully-professional leagues, will '''generally''' be regarded as notable"'' – so not always), but if it passes ? NFOOTY basically covers a part of GNG - appearing in fully professional league generally means lots of coverage. Few apps in English lower leagues gets actually much less coverage than many professional footballers in half amateur leagues – hundreds, even thousands of them have been deleted from Wiki for not meeting NFOOTY... But in this case, people dug out every mention of B.George found in web. The article did look like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ben_George&oldid=855783735 this when I nominated, ofcourse it's much better now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly passes . No reason to make an exception to a general rule
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: I still feel this fails basic  even know there has been an attempt to improve the article the provided citations are . I am normally for keeping players that pass NFootball but on this occasion I feel there is a severe lack of notability as the player has failed to have a professional football career and carry the same sentiments as the above delete's
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: No evidence of significant coverage in , though some passing mentions at least in mine. Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 135#The criteria of WP:NSPORT here are too inclusive|2017 consensus suggests that SNGs are not to supersede GNG if the presumed references are not found, assuming they should be easy to find (recent, english language
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)