Deletion of Origin of the Harp

Comment: which, unlike the present article, contains referenced text about the title subject. The article as it stands appears to be an  synthesis of psalm texts and speculation. Nothing there is worth preserving by merger. (CSD A10 might be possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (:WP:OR)

Comment: No idea what this is, might be some poem or essay, in which case deletable per  or . For those who are unaware, there's a discussion on this article Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#Origin_of_the_Harp|here. This, to me, is a classic example of an article which (I believe) most see as un-encyclopedic, yet (strictly speaking) not caught by any of our CSD criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY||WP:OR)

Comment: per AllyD or '''delete''' (I know! We can move it to userspace and then U5 it! Genius! ...please don't actually do that).  applies (but not in userspace or else I'd U5 it in an instant), appears to be a poem, song, essay or something like that. The suggested redirect makes sense to me - not a super likely search term, but plausible
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWEBHOST)

Comment: It's a poem/song lyric, not an encyclopedia article. There ought to be a CSD for "not an encyclopedia article or anything which could plausibly become one". Can we invoke  to close  this AfD and avoid this stuff cluttering up the encyclopedia any longer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)