Deletion of Jet Jurgensmeyer

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Ulch! I can't believe I'm saying this, but under Wikipedia's current (what I consider to be low) notability standards, I think Jurgensmeyer actually clears  – among ''The Little Rascals Save the Day'', ''Adventures in Babysitting (2016 film)'' and ''Legends of the Hidden Temple (2016 film)'', I think he's got it. I've added some mainline sourcing to the article to, and cut down on the promotional stuff. It's possible there's even more secondary sourcing out there (though I tend to doubt it). In any case, under the current "rules of the game", I think Jurgensmeyer is currently a "weak keep". (Failing that, this article would be a strong candidate for "Draftifying
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Generates some sourcing "heat" for ''Legends of the Hidden Temple: The Movie'' and ''The Little Rascals Save the Day'', but I'm inclined to think it's not enough. I lean in the direction of this being  here. But I won't vote yet, and could be persuaded otherwise, sourcing quality permitted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)