Deletion of Scientology In Australia

Comment: Nobody has demonstrated what this is a POV fork ''of'', and clearly there are multiple independent sources upon which to build an article discussing Scientology In Australia. It should be moved to Scientology in Australia though, per . Fits in the Widgets in Australia series (not all of which are religions - even though that's all that are listed above) mentioned by Trijah
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MSH)

Comment: This is what  has to say: "Even if the subject of the new article is controversial, this does not automatically make the new article a POV fork. However, the moved material must be replaced with an NPOV summary of that material. If it is not, then the "spinning out" is really a clear act of POV forking: a new article has been created so that the main article can favor some viewpoints over others." And that's precisely what's happened here, as this tail was clearly created to wag the dog, to highlight these alleged controversies. That these controversies were not originally on Scientology controversy (where they belong) makes no difference
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)