Deletion of Post-obsolescence Commodore 64 projects

Comment: per . The NYT source is nice, but the article itself is almost entirely written according to fansites, and honestly the article reads like something that a fansite would host. It should be greatly trimmed/streamlined and put into the main article - a spin out is unnecessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)