Deletion of Ouija Board Criticism

Comment: This is a  of Ouija that appears to be solely devoted to the POV that Ouija leads to contact with demons and causes insanity. There have been repeated attempts (against consensus) to add this same material at Ouija that is not only poorly sourced, but gives  weight to a Christian-centric view of the subject. There is also the problem that the material in the article is a , apparently being lifted directly from someone called http://www.hauntedamericatours.com/ghosts/OuijaBoard.php Mary Thomas Guicson
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE||WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: This article violates the |neutral point of view and is written in a non-encyclopedic fashion.  The solid information and associated references should be merged into Ouija
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: clear  and as others have pointed out most of the material originated on Wikipedia but was rejected from the ouija page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Per  (I know, it is interesting I am using this as rational to keep when others using the same link as rational to delete).  Reading this, it specifically states "Any daughter article that deals with opinions about the subject of parent article must include suitably-weighted positive and negative opinions, and/or rebuttals, if available, and the original article should contain a neutral summary of the split article.".  I believe this is an appropriate split off article, as I can see it grow in size - off hand, there are plenty of RS that could be included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)