Deletion of Lynn Parsons

Comment: A list of job changes taken from online trade rags doesn't demonstrate notability. Nor does the fascinating info taken from her employer's site (which isn't exactly a  source) that "Her hobbies and interests include Feng Shui, science, the paranormal, English literature, antiques and swimming
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THIRDPARTY)

Comment: Aside from http://radiotoday.co.uk/2007/03/parsons-and-allen-join-smooth/ this, none of the third-party sources are ''about'' the subject, only mentioning the subject in passing.  The article fails .  Coupled with the BLP concerns, supposedly from the subject herself, it seems best to remove the article at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the article has been edited significantly since the nomination was posted, and plainly meets the requirements of  now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the concerns of the subject of the article appear to have been addressed and an Wikipedia:OTRS ticket is the next step if she still has some concerns. The topic meets  per what is in the article and what is posted above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)