Deletion of List of fictional brands in South Park (2nd nomination)

Comment: It seems the whole article structure is based on |original research (fictional brand  real brand; description), and it also lacks real-world notability as outlined in . Editors wishing to keep this list need to give reasons why the  guideline does not apply to this article. '''Transwiki''' if there's a South Park wikia. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:FICT||WP:FICT)

Comment: because Wikipedia is about real-world context, and there is no secondary information about these items.  I would imagine that a section about "Fictional brands" on the main South Park article talking about its conception and implementation would be completely appropriate (though a full prose article would be possible if there was sufficient real-world context).  Here, the list is an #DIR|inappropriate directory of every fictional brand that's been mentioned on the show -- there's no relevance indicated by this collection of |indiscriminate information.  I would suggest instead a transwiki to a South Park Wikia and perhaps provide an external link to it under wherever a prose section/article about the show's fictional brands would exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IINFO)