Deletion of List of gay bathhouse regulars

Comment: as partial as I am to a spot of cottaging, I'm not sure I see the encyclopedic value of this article. Also,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP)

Comment: Per Teahot; also, the title problem has been fixed, thus invalidating the major argument for deletion. I don't get the  objection either. It's sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The  argument is compelling. And defining a "regular" is impossible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: based on  and  concerns, as well as DJ's point that this list is and always will be incomplete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:N)

Comment: I am increasingly concerned at how discussion on this page is changing the original opinions contributed. This AFD was raised without following the guidance of , in particular: {{small|"Consider making the page a useful redirect or proposing it be merged rather than deleted. Neither of these actions requires an AfD."}}, and {{small|"Before nominating a recently created article, please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape. Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator or notifying an associated wikiproject, mentioning your concerns on the article's discussion page, and/or adding a "cleanup" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: with the name change, the remaining non-trivial coverage can clearly be sourced to reliable sources. with reliable sources,  is not an issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: due to  concerns. The phrase "regular" is also very subjective and the list will never be complete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: While I agree that  doesn't, of course, apply to dead people, this list isn't named "List of dead gay bathhouse regulars" and obviously won't stay to zero live ones.  Beyond that, while I dislike reaching for the cruft argument, this is as crufty a list as I can imagine still existing; no doubt you could also source a List of sitcom actors who wear string ties in church, but that scarcely makes it encyclopedic.  And despite the citation of the OED, this will remain a desperately subjective notion which smacks more of prurient interest than scholarship
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: no objective standard exists as to what constitutes a "regular" at a bath house. How many visits over what time frame make one a "regular"? The article itself points to the problems in trying to objectively quantify someone as a "regular" with its inclusion of Justin Fashanu as a "regular" when the source supporting his inclusion explicitly describes him as a "newcomer". Although most of those currently included are dead, there is also serious potential for  issues since labeling someone as a "regular" at a facility for which a primary purpose is to engage in anonymous sex with multiple partners is quite likely defamatory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)