Deletion of The Richest Man in Babylon

Comment: There are actually a fairly solid list of sources that ''could'' be used to write an article about this book. But right now, we don't have an article about this book. We have an article-length treatment of the contents of this book, in violation of . I'm generally an advocate of "AFD isn't for cleanup". But the lead is essentially the only policy-compliant element of this article as it stands. If that's the best we can do, then we maybe ought to |put this down and try again, although I suspect that an interested editor could do something better here in short order either way
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:TNT)

Comment: Massive  fail by Nom.  Kudos to Phil Bridger for reducing text to a very brief, informative stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Meets .  Article is improved with reliable sources to show subject is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)