Deletion of Mao Sugiyama

Comment: Whatever that we may think about what he did, he has enough coverage in reliable sources https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/9555101/Japanese-man-charged-with-indecent-exposure-after-serving-own-genitals-to-paying-guests.htmlhttp://next.liberation.fr/sexe/2012/05/25/un-japonais-asexuel-fait-deguster-son-penis-et-ses-testicules_821408https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/nov/11/scrotum-top-10-shocking-performance-arthttps://www.irishmirror.ie/news/weird-news/suffering-art-creative-types-literally-6134325, and collaborated with other artists - https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/27/world/asia/china-art-lu-yang-venice-biennale.htmlhttps://www.artslant.com/ny/articles/show/39744-uterusman-a-superhero-in-the-age-of-artificial-reproduction as Yuma Hamasaqi. I don't think  (what he did is not run-of-the-mill, nor is the coverage) or  (people are more likely to read about it in mainstream media than go looking for him here) is relevant here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:BEANS)