Deletion of Jupiter-Avia

Comment: existiance of airline has been |verified though |reliable sources. Neither |the size or the article or |its state is a cause for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:TOOLITTLE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: I'm satisfied the company existed and then folded, but this makes them like lots of other small businesses that fail all the time.  From Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability:  ''"Inclusion on Wikipedia for the most part means meeting the general notability guideline, which in a summary, requires there to be multiple reliable sources independent of the subject that provide more than just a mere trivial mention."''  The 3 "sources" provided are trivial mentions, telling only that the subject had 2 planes and where and when they operated, data that the government likely mandated be collected even if no one thought they were interesting.  Each source is essentially a directory or online database equivalents where the objective appears to be completeness.  Wikipedia is  and it's certainly not a meta-directory of all other directories.  From un-of-the-mill: ''"In order for such a commonplace item to be worthy for inclusion in an article, there must be sources provided other than those that would source so many others just like it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:R)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Googling suggests they don't exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)