Deletion of Zeta Chi

Comment: Well, according to , a local place deserves its own article as long as there is sufficient information that can be attributed to a reliable source; such seems to be satisfied by the ''Baird's manual'' with supplementary information from Zeta Chi's website (considered a self-reliable source as per  as long as it isn't unduly self-serving). Considering that  did not make it as a guideline on account that many people considered it ''overly exclusionistic'' and that this article may still meet its standards perhaps says that it should be included.  Moreover, I believe the --which specifically states that neither fame, popularity, nor even importance are necessary--are at least weakly satisfied here due to the existence of independent sources which address the fraternity. For example, in addition to ''Baird's'', there is http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=9pcyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=1ucFAAAAIBAJ&dq=zeta-chi%20baldwin&pg=2988,1820645 this article (note: link doesn't quite send you in right location; look for the yellow highlighted portion in the right panel) which discusses at length the building of an addition to the frat house, though I admit it is debatable whether such is "routine" coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL||WP:SOURCES||WP:LOCAL||WP:GNG)