Deletion of Rosicrucian Order of Alpha et Omega

Comment: Nominator seems to be acting in bad faith when he says "I am answering a challenge made..." in the actual nom itself.  This ties into Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Open_Source_Order_of_the_Golden_Dawn.  I don't want to assume bad faith, but the nom's own words clearly indicate he has a horse in this race, or #soap|clearly a point to be made, which is reason to close discussion.   In short, the entire premise of this nom is tainted, and nominating articles because you were dared, challenged or otherwise IS bad faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I don't see any |reliable sources which back up the |notability of this organization.  It's clearly not a bad faith nomination; he was requested, by another user to nominate this page, and did so.  I don't see any reason to oppose on such a basis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORG)

Comment: Flunks .  At best, it merits a sentence in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)