Deletion of Hajj Amin Elahi

Comment: The above procedure only applies to  deletion nominations, not to AfD or CSD.  I've restored the tag and warned the user.  My opinion on the article is, at present, '''Neutral
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)

Comment: per nom.  No reliable sources to indicate the notability of the subject, per .  To clarify, he's not notable merely because his father is notable, and, to consider him notable as a musician, we need evidence of non-trivial coverage of him or his performances in sources that pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:RS)

Comment: The book can NOT be discredited. It is a valid book that was published. The New York Times obituaries is valid to establish the date of death. You are wrong about public figures not having to pay. Public figures do not have to pay if an editorial is written up about them, but they absolutely do have to pay if they place a notice in the obituary section. Regardless of the above, a lack of citations isn't a reason for a delete. Importance/Significance has been claimed, which is enough to satisfy #A7
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: for lack of reliable sources. If this man really was as important as most of the people urging 'Keep!' say he is, ''something'' would be written about him in a reliable source ''somewhere'', yet that does not seem to be the case. While he clearly has many fans who would like to see the article kept, reliable sources must be provided in order to do so; in its current form it fails Wikipedia's |guideline for the inclusion of biographies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)