Deletion of Junie Hoang

Comment: Does not meet the standards of , and the lawsuit puts her squarely into  territory as she is only in the news for that.  Would not be opposed to a redirect to an article on the lawsuit if that itself is deemed notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and . This suit isn't notable enough for its own page. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I'm persuaded that / apply here, and there should not be an article on Hoang herself.  Apart from the notable lawsuit, she's a third-tier actor, and would not merit an article but for the lawsuit.  The guidance in the  policy and  guideline anticipate that there is already a separate article on the event into which the content should be merged, but that's not the case here.  A few editors have suggested creating an article and redirecting; or deleting without prejudice to recreating.  Some have suggested just deleting based on the policy or guideline without considering the notability of the event.  Because an article on the event will consist of substantially the same material as the "Junie_Hoang#Lawsuit_against_IMDb|Lawsuit against IMDb" section, we should not delete this article and re-create that material.  Apart from the inefficiencies of recreating deleted work, deletion and recreation will lose the history that needs to be maintained to comply with -BY-SA.  In light of that, the page should be moved to ''Hoang v. Amazon.com'' and edited to conform to the article being about the case rather than the actor (and to avoid  issues).  I've changed my position above accordingly
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E||WP:CC||WP:PSEUDO)

Comment: While the subject is not notable for anything but the lawsuit, as I can find, there is no justification to keep the article.  However, I do feel that the lawsuit itself is notable in the coverage that it has received http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/imdb-age-lawsuit-actress-junie-hoang-sues-imdb-18939218 ABC, http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2013/apr/12/imdb-age-lawsuit-junie-hoang Guardian, http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-morning-fix-20130412,0,6892786.story LA Times, http://www.backstage.com/news/jury-decides-against-actor-imdb-suit/ Backstage, http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/age_rage_star_goes_down_to_imdbeat_JaVW5uxSAKPLWhL4LgNWOK NY Post, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-suing-imdb-faces-tough-436780 Hollywood Reporter, and others.  Per vent, , and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E||WP:GNG||WP:1E)

Comment: honestly not convinced an article on the lawsuit would be suitable either, but it's a better approach than this classic |one-event biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)