Deletion of Messed Up (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fundamentally, the question here is whether there's a second reliable source (as ''Die Tageszeitung'' is unquestionably the first). I think that answer is probably yes. ''Cafébabel'' is a distinctly weird publication, based on the concept of participatory journalism; however, it doesn't appear to be "user-generated content" in the way that normally excludes sites from satisfying . It has a stated editorial policy, and includes editorial oversight both in terms of article topic selection and traditional prose editing; additionally, it is published by a recognized nonprofit that partners with Europe for Citizens. We've certainly accepted far more marginal sources as reliable elsewhere. And there's no question that the article in question offers a significant treatment of the subject. Now, some of the other sources? Probably not as good. But that's not a deletion rationale
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)