Deletion of Virginia Hill

Comment: spaced ndash}}The topic passes notability guidelines per , notability for people, ''specifically'' the section , “A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.” If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.” The topic passes , section  due to the ''availability'' of multiple independent sources which demonstrate notability and in the manner of which those sources are not comprised of trivial coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO||WP:BASIC)

Comment: She's the subject of coverage (either biographical or fictionalized) in multiple reliable sources, viz. the biography listed under "Further reading," another biography by David Hanna, a Joel Schumacher film, continued news coverage. Yes, she probably wouldn't have received this coverage if she weren't the girlfriend of a notable person, but it's still coverage;  says that people aren't notable just for being related to other notable people, ''not'' that we should ignore our ordinary notability standards and discard RS coverage because the person is related to a notable person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)