Deletion of Michel Fattouche

Comment: With GS h index around 15 (?? see debate below) just passes rof#C1. Severe pruning needed at least
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: and salt, multiply-re-created  article promoting an off-wiki agenda. Insufficient  exist to fix the problems of disputed claims made in this article. If the claims were accurate there would be many more sources available to back them ,as it is it appears that sources attributing these innovations to the subject are self-published and run counter to what independent sources say
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:RS)

Comment: The article claims that he is the inventor and is known for "Wideband Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing" and "Direct-sequence Spread Spectrum". I note that the both phrases have plenty of hits in Google scholar, with top citation counts of 245 for the first and 2465 for the second. Fattouche's publications on the subject consist of a self-published paper on wofdm with zero citations, and a patent on dsss with (once one excludes other patents and legal opinions from the cite count) maybe four citations. So our article appears to be quite misleading, and his claims of notability don't stand up under scrutiny. His GS citation counts (excluding patents) of 57, 43, 34, 29, 21, ... are not impressive enough to convince me of a pass of . But this is only a weak delete because he may have some chance of passing  via the many newspaper articles that mention him (most trivially, but maybe there is something nontrivial in there). If it's kept for this reason, the article needs to be rewritten to be based on what the newspaper articles say about him rather than touting him as an academic achiever
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: A Google News search verifies that this businessman/engineer/inventor/professor is notable.  Shortcomings due to |conflict of interest because a friend of his wrote the article should be addressed by normal editing rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)