Deletion of Nathan Williams (American football)

Comment: per Tarc. I wouldn't say he passes , but with the shoplifting thing and the routine coverage I'd say he squeaks by |the general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:GNG)

Comment: the subject fails  and , and hasn't received enough coverage to pass the |general notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NCOLLATH||WP:GNG)

Comment: Shoplifting is very common and many places cover the names of people who are charged and convicted with crimes.  Bottom line is his athletic career and it doesn't warrant notability  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: There's info out there that isn't in the article, which is rather surprising as this person got a fair bit of coverage as a freshman for http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3763913 a shoplifting charge.  So that plus in-depth coverage such as http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2013/02/ohio_states_nathan_williams_fe.html this article tips it into  passage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think a shoplifting charge is regular routine coverage, and everything else is general coverage, fails  (more coverage than most but still fails) and . We need to stop with that heavy inclusionism of keeping borderline notable BLPs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE)