Deletion of Stewardship economy

Comment: I disagree that http://www.ethicaleconomics.org.uk/2011/04/the-land-question-2/ this staff-signed book review from an established publisher's recommendation list and http://www.neweconomics.org/blog/2011/06/24/land-tax-vs-land-redistribution this post from New Economics Foundation staffer, economist, and historian David Boyle (author)|David Boyle are mere blogs in the non-institutional sense. They are non-trivial independent reviews satisfying . But the article isn't about the free book, it's about the concept, a reformulated variation on land value taxation, an increasingly popular form of property tax including in Africa where http://www.cihm.leeds.ac.uk/new/about-us/team/out-and-about/julian-pratt/ hospital faculty M.D. and primary article author Julian Pratt has been doing development work. Accordingly, here are some mentions of the term prior to Pratt's use of the term in his book which represent the same concept: http://books.google.com/books?id=18JNNQR2QHwC&pg=PA159&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XZlQUfaGLuSMyQHgr4D4DQ&ved=0CDMQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q=%22Stewardship%20economy%22&f=false 2000, http://books.google.com/books?id=QykskrW6r-IC&q=%22Stewardship+economy%22&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=v51QUfT7OoGOygGU7oG4BA&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAjgo 2003, http://books.google.com/books?id=qrkYsm34OocC&q=%22Stewardship+economy%22&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=v51QUfT7OoGOygGU7oG4BA&ved=0CFIQ6AEwBjgo 2004, http://books.google.com/books?id=tvqT2GBOUsEC&q=%22Stewardship+economy%22&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lp1QUYT_CueqywGmj4CABA&ved=0CFQQ6AEwBjge 2004, http://books.google.com/books?id=u2RPAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Stewardship+economy%22&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=kplQUfmXAcjMyQG_iICIAQ&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAjgU 2010, http://books.google.com/books?id=K4tZAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Stewardship+economy%22&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lp1QUYT_CueqywGmj4CABA&ved=0CFgQ6AEwBzge 2010, http://books.google.com/books?id=WsjLLarLv3MC&pg=PA96&dq=%22Stewardship+economy%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=MplQUdOpGIrzyAGnj4CICQ&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw#v=snippet&q=%22Stewardship%20economy%22&f=false 2011. Presumably those books should be added to "further reading
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: On first pass, given the placement in the economic footer and reading it, it sounded like an easy keep.  Upon closer examination, I could find only one real source for this: A single book by one author.  Given that is is being shown as an important economic model, I would think there would be one reference on Google News, World Cat, National Library of Australia, National Library of Australia, the US Library of Congress, Newsbank, Google Books, the University of Canberra catalog, The Economist website, the Chicago Tribune.  I just could not find anything there to support this being an economy type of any note.  Reading the text and absent any other reliable sources based on independent search, it appears to border on Wikipedia:Fringe theories. Of the sources listed by EllenCT, the first is trivial, the second references "product stewardship economy" and is unclear if it is the same topic (and also trivial), Sustaining the earth source is also trivial, the next source has more details but is also about  "product stewardship economy" which never appears in the article, Report - Water Resources Center, University of California, Issues 77-84 is a trivial mention to a resource stewardship economy and is trivial, the next reference is also trivial, and the same for the last. Not the same names and trivial.  Does not establish  and shows major problems with  for this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)