Deletion of Eric Katz

Comment: As usual in pure mathematics the citation counts are low, but that doesn't tell us much, because they're always low. So we have to rely on other indicators instead. He recently moved from associate professor at one university to assistant at another; this sort of drop is very rare and I don't understand it. I don't think we should count it against him unless we understand why it happened, but the fact remains that he is currently at the assistant level, which is usually below our threshold for a keep. He helped solve a conjecture that caught the attention of Gil Kalai, but that's not enough for notability by itself and raises  issues. His CV doesn't show any major awards or other factors that would bring up the level of notability of the article.  And the only independent sourcing we have for the article are a blog post that has a short mention (one paragraph) on the problem Katz helped solve and an even shorter mention of Katz's contribution to it, and a magazine profile of someone else. I don't think that's good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I definitely think this isn't as simple as saying Eric fails . With regards to the drop from Associate to Assistant Professor position, well, he already was an Associate Professor, and he will become one soon again. ''If'' it is the case that say, any associate math professor in a western country can have a Wikipedia page, then I think he should have one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: Fails , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:NACADEMIC)