Deletion of Bernie would have won

Comment: The sources are not actually demonstrating that this is the ''name'' of a specific meme, they're simply demonstrating that this is a statement of opinion that some people ''believe''. Almost all of the sources here are not covering a ''meme'' per se, but are simply op-eds or interviews in which people ''state'' their ''opinion'' on this question in ''words''. And yes, ''one'' source demonstrates that some people communicated their belief by making Bernie Sanders memes — but even then, "Bernie would have won" is the underlying ''idea'' those memes are trying to communicate and not the ''name'' of any specific notable meme in its own right. So this is a matter of somebody trying to reify an unfalsifiable and untestable opinion — it's impossible to go back in time and rerun the 2016 election to verify whether these people are correct or not — into a named thing by citing every piece of opinion journalism they can find that happens to agree with them, and then ''calling'' that a meme even though the sources overwhelmingly don't support that label. The place for any content about the belief that Bernie Sanders would be in the White House right now if he'd been the Democratic candidate in 2016 is in Bernie Sanders' , not in an article titled with a statement of opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: obviously Kirbanzo, you have not read the article since I added 15 sources today.  The meme itself is discussed by Newsweek, The New Yorker and Vice News.  I also added supporting quotes and further discussion from a myriad of sources, Huffington Post, Daily Beast, Daily Kos, New York Times, The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill and I only got off the first page of google.  Damn, I thought I also added CNN.  Point being there are tons of sources discussing this subject.  As I said when I removed the PROD, on  grounds alone this is clearly a notable subject.  Several commentators have made it a primary theme of their programming.  I think the real reason this article is under attack today is it was just added to the Bernie Sanders page, where I noticed it in my watchlist for the first time.  But the article has been around for almost a year.  Now that it gets some exposure, we will get more people and !votes from the  crowd.  But that is not a legitimate excuse to delete an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)