Deletion of Stephen Liddle

Comment: A GS h-index of around 24 for "S T Liddle" gives a clear pass of rof#C1. Nominator should do efore when making further nominations in this area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:B)

Comment: per notability as a scholar .  '''Note to Nominator:'''  You seem to be challenging not just this particular scholar but the whole idea of notability of papers and scholarship as grounds for notability.  That's a case that would be better made at , not on one particular academic.  There are many, many academics who are listed on Wikipedia on similar grounds as Stephen Liddle; so if you think these kinds of people are not notable because they do not have secondary source coverage in the NYT etc, then that's a question that would be better brought up at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Jeez, ≤one hour 12 minutes old and already nominated?  and  apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:DONTBITE)