Deletion of Matt Carter (Heir)

Comment: WP:NOTINHERITED fits quite well here, without the slightest irony. No |reliable sources to show that he is notable in and of his own right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Not enough information to establish notability and (as been stated several times already) 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: for the record, my two cents says he's non-notable, per my own Google searches and the |general notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Google seems to indicate not notable.  And, of course, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: His chief claim for notability is being the son and heir of David Carter, current owner of Carter Investments, yet neither David Carter nor Carter Investments have received enough coverage to be considered notable enough to inspire Wikipedia articles about them, at least not yet. Is it sufficiently notable to be heir of a company that is not itself notable? Or son of a man who is not notable? My thought would be no. And, independent of his connection to David Carter and Carter Investments, little in the article and nothing in my research indicates that he has otherwise made himself notable, save for the claims that he consorts with numerous celebrities, which, if true, still doesn't make him notable; he himself must receive coverage by |multiple, third party reliable sources. The sources listed on the page to not satisfy this requirement, and my attempts to find reliable sources that do substantiate notability have been unsuccessful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)