Deletion of Offline Storage Table

Comment: per #G11|G11 - Unambiguous advertising. This is just puff advertising for http://www.convert-osttopst.net/ this website as linked in the article. Any useful encyclopaedic content can go in Microsoft Exchange Server
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Relisting as the article has been cleaned up and the speedy delete !votes no longer apply. I would also like to hear more about whether sources exist about this file format that might show it passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While I appreciate MatthewVanitas' efforts with the article, I don't think |other stuff exists is a sufficient reason to keep. Notability for a stand-alone article simply hasn't been established in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: I didn't find any reliable source information on "Offline Storage Table". Loooking at OST + Microsoft + Prospect (e.g., Microsoft company Prospect, I didn't find anythng. I looked for "OST data file", and found "Provide to OST data files and images of remittance received each day in a structure and format compatible with OST systems and BIA specifications."https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=76c45d01361b86a695319c995a651ed5 FedBizOpps May 15, 2009. From that, I looked at OST systems, which brought many hits for Open System Technologies as well as hits for out-of-school time (OST), Open Systems Thinking (OST), Operator System Transmission (OST), etc. I think it would be of value for Wikipedia to have an article on the Offline Storage Table topic, but without meeting even a lower end of the  requirement of reliable source material, I don't see a Wikipedia basis for keeping the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per #G11|G11 - Unambiguous advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)