Deletion of Peter Fletcher

Comment: not sufficiently notable per , part of POV editing campaign in violation of  a forum for advocacy.  I'm afraid the "rapid response" includes some "rabid response
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT)

Comment: thought I'd come back for one last edit....  Fletcher is |not notable.  This article is just another attempt by Ombudsman to spread more anti-immunisation idiocy around wikipedia.  ''WHY'' hasn't Ombudsman been banned for #Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox|using wikipedia as a soapbox?  Ombudsman is just as bad as John Gohde (who will be back in little over a month after his year-long ban, what fun!), but Ombudsman makes admirable use of a thesaurus, and he's certainly got his foot in the door now with his countless POV edits on vaccine conspiracies/autism conspiracies/9-11 conspiracies/you-name-it conspiracies. DocJohnny's already gone, and why am I leaving instead of Ombudsman
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT)

Comment: according to . If kept, should be rewritten according to NPOV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)