Deletion of Marek Rychlik

Comment: The article may well have been started out of self-promotional intent. Yet, while the reason we discourage |autobiographies is because of the obvious danger of neutrality and notability, the current one-liner can hardly be described as promotional tone, and the OP clearly fulfills our notability guidelines on cademic|academics. For notability on his solution to the equichordal point problem, see for example http://books.google.com/books?id=tRdoIhHh3moC&pg=PA80&lpg=PA80&dq=equichordal+point+-wiki+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=BwR7aegoWB&sig=NoJFnZydNIq_NA9D7Piw42_AWz4&hl=de&ei=OcX_TOXCIcax8gPP2fGMCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBoQ6AEwATgo#v=onepage&q=equichordal%20point%20-wiki%20-wikipedia&f=false this book including its http://books.google.com/books?id=tRdoIhHh3moC&pg=PA80&lpg=PA80&dq=equichordal+point+-wiki+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=BwR7aegoWB&sig=NoJFnZydNIq_NA9D7Piw42_AWz4&hl=de&ei=OcX_TOXCIcax8gPP2fGMCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CBoQ6AEwATgo#v=onepage&q=rychlik&f=false introduction. (Nonrespective , I have been overruled with a ''keep'' vote in AfD discussions where I voted ''delete'' for much less notable persons, so I don't quite see why we want this one to be deleted based on notability grounds
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO||WP:A||WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: MathSciNet citation counts are 57,19,14,13,10,6. Gscholar counts are 142,71,49,24,21,14,8,7,etc. The prizes listed in his CV do not seem terribly significant. I conclude that he fails to meet  criterion 1 on the basis of citations (weak b/c his most-cited paper is very well cited), and do not see other grounds for notability. Solving problems is what mathematicians do - that he solved one makes him a respectable professional mathematician, but not necessarily more notable than your typical tenured professor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)