Deletion of The Suburban Jungle

Comment: easily satisfies  conditions #3 through Plan 9 publications (a legitimate and respected publisher) and Keenspot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per . Keenspot easily satisfies 's requirements for a well known and independent medium
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: The comic spectacularly passes : ithas nontrivial hosting (KeenSpot), it is published by Plan 9 Publishing and as well as the awards brought up in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 17#{{anchorencode:The Suburban Jungle}}|deletion review
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per Dragonfiend. I was tempted to keep it at first (publication of a webcomic in book collections of ten is an indicator of notability), but when you notice that e.g. the collection "Tough Breaks" gets 8 distinct Google hitshttp://www.google.be/search?hl=nl&q=%22the+suburban+jungle%22+%22tough+breaks%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Zoeken&meta=, including the homepage of the comic, the publisher and KeenSpot, then you get the impression that this (web)comic has failed to make any imporession and lacks all  sources about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: no decent third-party sources about this topic, let alone any suggesting the website has any noted achievements, impact or historical significance. Being distributed by two minor, little-known publishers does not meet , nor would meeting a notability guideline mean that this article meets our content policies. Without decent sources, all we're left with is original research and wikipedia editor's points of view. Note that several of the comments above misinterpret . Plan 9 Publishing  is not a "well known and independent .... online publisher;" it is a little known book publisher whose own unreferenced article appears to fall short of .  "Nontrivial hosting" is not part of , though "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself" is, which this article does not meet.  Claims of a "non-trivial print run" do not appear to be backed up here or in the article; do we have any sources for the print runs of these books? Any reviews of these books by reputable publications? Or have four supposedly "notable" books been published, yet no decent sources have bothered to note them?  If a webcomic falls in the forest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:CORP||WP:WEB)

Comment: I think Keenspot is well known enough in the webcomic world to count as a well known and independent medium, satisfying  #3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)