Deletion of Mark Eberhart

Comment: per , two major-publisher books (I think he also has a self-published one that we're not even mentioning?) and the multiple book reviews (many found by Russ Woodroofe) that I just added to the article: so far, seven for ''Why Things Break'' including two in big-audience publications (''Science'' and ''Wired''); three for ''Feeding the Fire'' including one in ''The Boston Globe''. It turns out we're using these as sources for several of our articles, so I was able to de-orphan this article. I also added two independent brief biographies, one for a National Academy Fellows program and another from Encyclopedia.com. I don't understand the claims above about this article being promotional: it is and has been purely factual, merely listing biographical details about Eberhart and the fact that he has published the books that he has published
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I agree that there is little sign of .  However, the subject has written two books.  Reviews of the books include https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-4000-4760-4 https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-307-23744-6 https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/mark-eberhart/why-things-break/ https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/mark-e-eberhart/feeding-the-fire/ https://www.wired.com/2003/10/reviews-36/ https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18024166-500-school-of-hard-knocks/ http://archive.boston.com/ae/books/articles/2007/07/15/alarms_ideas_to_help_save_a_damaged_world/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/3835973.  I think this is enough for the multiple reviews (of multiple works, to avoid ) of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:BLP1E||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Might not pass #C1, but appears to pass . I'm not seeing how the text is "promotional"; it's a rather dry mini-bio
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)