Deletion of Jnanadeepa: Pune Journal of Religious Studies

Comment: I think that you misunderstand how we do things here. It is not up to us to evaluate the contents of the journal and to decide whether it is meritorious or not. WP reports what ''others'' have said. That is how we interpret "notability" here: that others have ''noted'' the journal. As it is pretty rare that there are |independent reliable sources discussing a particular journal in depth (as opposed to discussing ''articles'' that were published in that journal), we also look at whether the journal is included in relevant, ''selective'' databases. (See ournals. In the present case, the journal is not even in the specialized ATLA database, so unless something else comes us, it looks like the journal is not notable at this point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NJ)