Deletion of Kedar Joshi (2nd nomination)

Comment: http://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-nb2003-15579 WorldCat seems to mention that the subject has authored 12 works in 14 publications in 2 languages and 21 library holdings worldwide; e.g. http://solo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/dlDisplay.do?vid=OXVU1&docId=oxfaleph015721190 Bodleian Library, University of Oxford, http://search.lib.cam.ac.uk/?itemid=|collandb|480986 Jesus College Library, University of Cambridge, http://solo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/dlDisplay.do?vid=OXVU1&docId=oxfaleph015451937 Pembroke College Library, University of Oxford, http://www.library.iitb.ac.in/newsearchbook/ca_det.php?m_doc_no=107561 Central Library, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/20607868 University of Melbourne Library, http://hdl.handle.net/10079/bibid/6454373 Yale University Library, https://catalogue.lse.ac.uk/Author/Home?author=Joshi%2C%20Kedar%2C%201979- British Library of Political and Economic Science, etc. Is that too, then, not an indication of his notability, maybe per reative? The subject's works appear to be self-published and yet they seem to be included or represented within the collections of several notable ''academic libraries'', which may be ''equivalent'' to meeting the reative criterion that a person is presumably notable if his/her work (or works) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable ''galleries'' or ''museums''. In other words, would such reputable academic libraries hold the works unless they consider them (and/or their author) notable or important? They presumably would not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:C)

Comment: mdash; Fails  and ; relies entirely on two sources, coverage of subject in which is in-passing and trivial. Doesn't even come close to . Same concerns raised in prior AfD are valid here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article require additional independent sources to establish the notability as well as the article seems to be written for promotional purposes as suggested in earlier fD|AfD. Delete as per |BPL and nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:BLP)