Deletion of Las Vegas Valley (landform)

Comment: This is an article from an editor who had problems with creating readable non technical articles.  Also the allegation that there are no online sources to improve the article is blatantly false.  A quick search provides many sources and additional material.  Clearly this land form exists and adding this material to the populated place know as Las Vegas (which includes more then the city) and is currently named Las Vegas Valley is already a broad article with many issues.  Adding this material to that article would create more problems there and add nothing to improving the material here and likely make it more difficult.  Given that most valley articles are likely stubs, I find it interesting that this one is nominated here.  This one has information and more sources.  I do agree that the section on the Great Basin Divide could be removed or just mentioned in passing.  But I'm reluctant to do so since I'm not sure how to decipher the technical material in that section. Finally, AfD is |not article cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: There are no real able sources, and two of the main sections are just a rehash of existing articles: Las Vegas Valley and Great Basin Divide. If better sources are found to back up the  of the landform, then the author could recreate the article.  Of the two sources, one is not  and the other has a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RELIABLE||WP:PAYWALL)