Deletion of Transform diet

Comment: This nomination is not just about a book "not being on the shelves". The article is about a diet -- not a book. Here the two are inseparable, which is a manifestation of the lack of notability of the diet. Even when the book is released, and even if an article was written from a |neutral point of view with no |promotional language, one still needs to show the notability of the diet with |reliably sourced, |verifiable, references. The physical existence and distribution of a book defining/describing the diet does not ''guarantee'' that this topic will become appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Best of luck to you and thanks for participating in these discussions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ADVERT||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Blatant advertising and fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN)

Comment: No |reliable sources to establish |notability could be found for this book that has not yet been published.  Does not meet any of the basic criteria in |Notability (books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:BK)