Deletion of Librarians in popular culture (3rd nomination)

Comment: A lot of energy spent arguing here should have been used to transform the article's list into a discussion (putting my refs into the external link section doesn't count). I have learned that the best way to get back at a deletionist is not to win an argument with him but letting him eat |snow. That way you will get a better article and an extra perk of humiliating your opponent, even a Image:Barnstar hanging from helicopter.png|possible barnstar for extra ownage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: the number of afds does not matter. What does matter is the fact that over 85% of this article fails , , and . &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: If info such as "Debbie gets friendly with a librarian in Debbie Does Dallas (1978)" isn't #INFO|indiscriminate, #DIR|loosely associated |OR, I don't know what is. Totally unencylopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: as another in an unfortunately seemingly never-ending bunch of "articles" that are nothing but "spot the reference and run to the computer" trivia lists. #IINFO, #DIR, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:TRIVIA)