Deletion of Cornerstone (Austrian band)

Comment: appears to meet  #2 at least.  I concur that that criteria is extremely problematic and sets the bar a lot lower than I'd like, but that's the policy that community consensus came up with.  Arguably also meets  #4 to make the whole thing moot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Article could be claimed to have a COI, however this is irrelevant so long as it does not show in the text. As is, this somewhat comes through and should be toned down, with less focus on the band's achievements. Band appears to meet  (as stated, whether for 1 week or a year, it still achieved a chart single) with (some) reliable sources, so I see no reason to remove the page IF the author agrees to phrase it properly
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Does appear to just barely pass . May not pass .  I thought ATOM Records was a major label, but it's not. Yes, there's an  problem, a  problem, and a  problem. There's a discussion at /I as well. I took some of the promotional language out of the article to help deal with those issues
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC||WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:OWN||WP:AN)

Comment: I was asked to comment here by {{U|Jytdog}}, although I do not know the reliability of the various sources in this field. I imagine I was asked to comment on whether technically meeting a list of requirements such as at NMUSIC is sufficient, because this point sometimes comes up with the somewhat analogous . . I think that it usually is, but not always, for we go by our judgment of the intent and spirit of the rules. Therefore,   it is  a matter of judgment,and we are entitled to form it for the circumstances of an individual article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Possibly'' meeting one criterion of  is not a slam-dunk for inclusion; the guideline says the criteria ''may'' (not necessarily ''do'') demonstrate notability. There's a pattern of promotion here which is incompatible with an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: passes  # 2, had a charting single in Austria's official charts, and there are enough other sources to comply with the general coverage requirement. fD is not cleanup, content decisions must be discussed at the pertaining talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND||WP:A)

Comment: I want to be thorough even if it doesn't matter at this juncture, so I researched a claim made earlier.  The claim that the band is notable because it meets  criterion 10 is supported by the statement that the film the band contributed music to (''Little Alien'') won an editing award at the Los Angeles Film Festival and is therefore notable.  That is incorrect.  According to the Los Angeles Film Festival#Awards presented|awards section of the article (and this http://blogs.indiewire.com/thompsononhollywood/los-angeles-film-festival-unveils-2015-awards-winners-20150617 award list for 2015), the LA Film Festival doesn't give technical awards for editing. Moreover, according to the film lineup for the 2010 LA Film Fest from the ''LA Times'', ''Little Alien'' http://www.lalive.com/news/detail/film-independent-announces-official-film-selections-for-2010-los-angeles-film-festival-presented-by-the-los-angeles-times wasn't there.  So I think that the "Los Angeles International Film Festival" claimed on the film's page is exactly that (not that I can find a source for it), and not the more famous one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)