Deletion of Roebling (River Line station)

Comment: per longstanding precedent regarding train stations. See the years of discussions in the archives. The currently worded guideline (not policy) fails to account for the reality of Wikipedia practice (not unheard of when the guidelines are written by a few editors and their talk pages are rarely visited by the hundreds of editors who edit thousands of pages; that's the true 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONLIMITED)

Comment: Whilst this article is likely to be kept - people have found more evidence of this station's notability - the notion of ''inherent'' notability of railway stations is circular reasoning. It's impossible to square with the |GNG and with our existing deletion processes. An AfD is Wikipedia's usual venue to assess whether or not a topic is notable; it's obviously fallacious to argue at an AfD that we should close it as a "keep" because we don't need to assess the notability because, err, different articles were previously found to be notable at some other AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Regardless of whether this individual station or this set of stations will survive AfD or not, this begs the question of the generally accepted standard of notability for train stations. Some editors mentioned that all stations is notable as per common outcomes. I checked the  but could not find the indication to suggest that there is consensus about about rail stations. It further suggests to go to the  essay. It said, "It may be considered that if enough attributable information exists about a station or railway line to write a full and comprehensive article about it, it may make sense for the subject to have its own article." That does not say about train stations are presumed to be notable. Also in the Train project page notability /MOS|essay, it has a very high bar for the infrastructure and buildings (stations included) such that one has to reach the historical status. It also refers back to  for the ongoing discussion about the notability. Therefore, there is no clear consensus or clear common outcomes in term of the stations. At the very least, if there is a commonly accepted standard developed by consensus to deviate from the GNG, that should be documented as such at the essay level, or at the  guideline level. If there is no consensus on that yet, the topic of station notability should be specifically discussed, perhaps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Manual of style|there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:RAILOUTCOMES||WP:STATION||WP:TWP||WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: per long-standing consensus and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)