Deletion of Enos Foord

Comment: Non notable office to pass  nor the sourcing is good enough to pass . Snow delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Registrar of deeds" is not an inherently notable office, and the depth of sourcing is not solid enough to get him over  in lieu — a strong majority of the sources here are |primary, not notability-making or |reliable, and the most substantive source on offer features less than a paragraph's worth of content about him strictly in the context of his affiliations with other people than in the context of him having done anything noteworthy in his own right. GNG is not just "count the footnotes and keep anything that meets or exceeds two"; it also tests for the ''depth'' of how substantively any source is or isn't ''about'' the subject, the geographic ''range'' of how widely the subject is ''getting'' covered, and the ''context'' of what the person is getting covered ''for'', so a person is not automatically notable enough for a Wikipedia article just because his name happens to appear on one page of a local history book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: As per  significant coverage in reliable source is required to establish notability hence I’m upholding
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)