Deletion of Al Rosas (2nd nomination)

Comment: non-notable per . Of the three refs that were on the article before the nominator removed them: the first ref was available on archive.org, https://web.archive.org/web/20150924080621/http://www.ocala.com/article/20080223/NEWS/802230338/1368/googlesitemapnews here, which does cite the "Rosas Farm" (note, ''not'' Al Rosas himself) as "one of the top small businesses in the United States" - but this is only a passing mention of the ''person'' - imo, not enough for an article. The second ref was also on archive.org, https://web.archive.org/web/20160303170311/http://eworldwire.com/pressreleases/17586 here - this is a press release, so not good enough for proving notability of either the company (which is what the press release is about), nor the person. The https://web.archive.org/web/20111003195142/http://www.ocalamagazine.com/specPubsNews/templates/features.aspx?articleid=1380&zoneid=17 third ref is already a link to archive.org - but none of the versions of that ref on archive.org actually appear to work, so I can't read it. I can't find any other reliable sources elsewhere for Al Rosas. In the future, there ''may possibly'' be enough sources for the company, but almost definitely not for Al Rosas himself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per , series of coverage in same paper or by the same journalist counts as one.. and in my opinion, the above source analysis shouldn't just be skimmed through. One of the source says "With some 600 restaurants in the area, that’s a heck of a lot of phone calls to make to find out which restaurants will be open Christmas day. But you can help! If your restaurant is planning to be open, or you know of one that will be, please let me know so I can share the news with everyone else. I’m planning to run the list of any places I know of that will be open in my Dec. 17 column in Go. So I need to know no later than Dec. 14 at noon (local time, not Timbuktu Standard). Contact me at". A coverage that is initiated by the business itself does not constitute a secondary source. I am thinking some of the source gathering and report generation is automated and does not consider the context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIRS)

Comment: I've already !voted (delete) above, but since then, the article has been updated with a few more references. In light of this (as my arguments from my earlier comment seem to have been made somewhat redundant now), I went through these refs with :User:DannyS712/SATG|this tool to try and see how good they are for establishing notability. What I think following this is that all of these refs are questionable regarding "in-depth coverage": ''all'' of them seem to talk in equal parts about Al Rosas, and his wife, and their farm "Rosas Farm". Therefore, I don't believe they are in-depth enough about Al in particular (as this article, and deletion discussion, ''is'' about Al in particular). In all these refs, Al seems to be given the same amount and depth of coverage as his wife and their farm - therefore, they're all questionable in establishing notability for Al Rosas, and so my earlier comment that Al Rosas isn't notable per  still stands even with the updated article; just with a slightly different reasoning
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)