Deletion of Criticism of Linux 2

Comment: W. Marsh is right - there is some serious |article ownership going on over at Linux. But the answer isn't a criticism POV fork... the answer is fighting to ensure a balanced main article, taking the owners to dispute resolution if needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: Bias is based on whether an article is one sided or not. Having an article entirely based on criticism makes that into a bias. If information can be well sourced then it should be included in the Linux article, if not then it has no place on this site. Also, how can you say that this is not biased? Most of its sources are Microsoft! I also think we should be rid of the Criticism of Microsoft article, but calling for that to be deleted would have a |snowballs chance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: While on the surface it seems that it is balanced, many of the critism is originate from Microsoft. If you condensed all of those into Microsoft, then there is only 1 article on ZDNet, one refute from GNU foundation, and one critized on linux by microsoft. Thus, it fails . However, there must be plenty other attribution, but until then it definitley violates . —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:NPOV)