Deletion of Kenya–Romania relations

Comment: per there being enough relevent hits to support real bilateral relations between the two nations.  http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:pqptqumbR04J:www.seap.usv.ro/annals/ojs/index.php/annals/article/viewPDFInterstitial/22/21+%2BKenya+%2BRomania&cd=15&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us here's a scholarly paper on bilateral tourism promotion between the two countries.  http://allafrica.com/stories/200512011035.html Here is a 2005 reference to contact between the two governments.  http://allafrica.com/stories/200312030106.html one from 2003 and http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-24691437.html a different one on a different issue from 2003 and http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=DTkVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=KggEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2664,4191847&dq=kenya+romania one from 1983.  Here's http://www.kbc.co.ke/story.asp?ID=40382 one from 2007.  Google News turns up some other stuff from time to time as well, once you cull out all of the unrelated sports stuff.  I will admit its not the most vibrant relationship, but unlike many of these "X-Y relationship" articles, this one does seem to cross the |notability Mendoza line
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article exists only by an apparent error: it was PRODDED on March 25, and that tag wasn't removed until April 6http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenya–Romania_relations&diff=282002856&oldid=279533657, well in excess of of 7 days. So this article should've been deleted on April 1; it's only because an error that we find ourselves going thru the motions of the this AfD. (But if you need a non-procedural argument for deletion, how about the original argument I made when PRODDing: "pointless article; no sources available on this topic; fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: No |secondary sources discuss these relations. Fails . The references in the article and mentioned above do ''not'' support these "relations" as |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: per nom. Lack of links that (at least those presented do not) address the topic. Normally one expects multiple in-depth sources, or at least one, or at least it should exist in theory. No evidence that somebody wrote a book about this, published a scholarly paper or anything of the kind. (http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:pqptqumbR04J:www.seap.usv.ro/annals/ojs/index.php/annals/article/viewPDFInterstitial/22/21+%2BKenya+%2BRomania&cd=15&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us should go to Tourism in Kenya. The paper in fact talks about the LACK of sufficient relations.) IMHO, does not pass otability. While large trade is deffinitevely notable, there is no evidence that it existed other than in theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)