Deletion of David MacGill

Comment: with David McGill - I've boldly added the two redlinked MacGills to that page already and amended its opening line to show that its scope includes both names. All that's needed now is to make a redirect from McG to MacG.  BUT in a case where this option wasn't available I would defend the existence of a dab page like this, which resolves ambiguity between two or more people who are already redlinked in existing articles. MOS:DABMENTION justifies their presence on the dab page, and it seems inconsistent if we then say that the dab page cannot exist because there happens not to be a bluelinked entry on it as yet. When someone has taken time to disentangle similarly-named persons, a dab page like this is useful and should not be deleted through a narrow interpretation of rules.  if necessary, but in this case there is a less controversial option
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)