Deletion of Jeffrey Herbener

Comment: per nom and LK; does not pass . A remark regarding RJC's comment above. Item 5 in #Notes and examples specifically mentions that, when demonstrating significant impact in an academic discipline, "the academic discipline of the person in question needs to be ''sufficiently broadly construed''. ... Overly narrow and highly specialized categories should be avoided. Arguing that someone is an expert in an extremely narrow area of study is, in and of itself, not necessarily sufficient to satisfy Criterion 1, except for the actual leaders in those subjects
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: I'll add that his work has not made any impact in broader terms, i.e. he has not obviously published anything in a mainstream journal, by which I mean one that is indexed by one of the major services. There's nothing in WoS using the broadest query of "author = Herbener J*". GS shows an h-index of 6, with one paper in "The Review of Austrian Economics" having been cited 23 times. However, these stats are still way below what we normally take as satisfying  #1. Without any intended disparagement of small christian colleges, I don't think a rank of full professor is comparable to that at a large research university, the latter of which often does imply satisfaction of  #5 or #6. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)