Deletion of Park No-ja

Comment: Does not appear to be notable in English" is probably the most blatant case of |systemic bias I've seen in this project.  If a topic notable in Korea and Norway, English Wikipedia shouldn't cover it?  Someone notable in countries where the primary language is not English is every reason for English language Wikipedia to cover them.  Best selling author and has received significant coverage by reliable sources such as ''The Dong-a Ilbo''. http://english.donga.com/srv/service.php3?bicode=060000&biid=2005100756678http://books.google.com/books?id=mrHmAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Park+No-ja%22&dq=%22Park+No-ja%22&hl=en&ei=CA5STJC_Nt7pnQeJoNDTAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAAhttp://books.google.com/books?id=NK-6AAAAIAAJ&q=%22Park+No-ja%22&dq=%22Park+No-ja%22&hl=en&ei=CA5STJC_Nt7pnQeJoNDTAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAQ  And these are only in English.  In Korean, there's much more.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22%EB%B0%95%EB%85%B8%EC%9E%90%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=pw http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?cntn_cd=A0000952624.  Probably even more in Norwegian ((bokmål
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)