Deletion of Juan Andres Caro Rivera

Comment: I did some other Google searches (''Juan Caro CSU Conservative Interest Group'' and ''Juan Caro Larimer'') as well and only found trivial mentions or otherwise insignificant coverage. There is no indication of satisfaction of . While I agree with the statements about INVALIDBIO and POLITICIAN, I will defend my decline of A7.  says {{tq|A claim of significance need not amount to a statement that, if sourced, would establish notability}} and {{tq|Therefore, a claim of significance need not pass any of the general or specialized notability guidelines, such as general notability guideline, music notability, or biography notability guideline}}. Being a politician and a "direct" descendant of a president alone does not necessarily make one notable, but I would think that they have a plausible chance of being notable based on the statement alone (cf. point 6 of  and what's written below it). Even if this is an edge case, speedy deletion should not be used, as it is only for clear cases. Furthermore, lack of notability is not recognised as a speedy deletion criteria (cf. ); the correct venues are AfD and (once) PROD. Linguist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CCOS||WP:CCOS||WP:NOTCSD)

Comment: fails  and . No independent notability demonstrated as an individual and it doesn't appear that the organizations he belongs to pass notability either. The claim of inherited notability regarding Sergio Jaramillo Caro isn't relevant here, as he was a former government minister and with articles in ''Newsweek'' and ''El Tiempo'', so he passes notability in his own right, regardless of who his ancestor was. The fact that the article creator's initials are the same as the Conservative Interest Group doesn't inspire confidence that there isn't a  going on here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:COI)