Deletion of Adverse health effects from lunar dust exposure

Comment: and partially rewrite — This article definitely has quite a bit of potential, there are several reliable sources that are already used in the article, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are more out there. |AfD isn't cleanup, although the article could admittedly use a considerable amount, such as adding more refs to the "Exploration mission operational scenarios" section and removing inappropriate first-person words throughout the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: While the article has issues, it is referenced and it is about a |notable topic. |If you conduct http://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=it&q=toxicity+lunar+dust&btnG=&lr= a quick search you find plenty of academic papers about the topic: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063308002444, http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/486014main_StubbsImpactOnExploration.4075.pdf, http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%290893-1321%282008%2921:4%28266%29, http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08958370290084683, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576508001239 just from the first results page. All concerns about |original research etc. can be solved by editing and, since |deletion is not a substitute for cleanup, our deletion policy requires |not to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:OR||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:ATD)