Deletion of Future (Red Velvet song)

Comment: Hi! Firstly, I beg to disagree with the statements and comments regarding the citation or reference use. Firstly, the two aforementioned references are still '''reliable'''. I haven't seen any guidelines regarding the use of "constitute press releases". Secondly, the next two references which are Melon (online music service)|Melon and the official website are still '''reliable'''. When it comes to Melon, this has been widely used in a lot of Korean-related song and album articles (mostly for "Credits and personnel" part). The official website on the other hand, states the same information and is the same with Melon as well. If Melon is not available as a reference for use then that does mean that a lot of articles have violated on what to use as a reference. Next, I didn't know that a music-related (song or album) articles should have "been certified or received major accolades" for it to be '''notable''' enough. I disapprove of this statement as it doesn't go well with what  has stated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: The song reached the top 100 on Billboard.  The article needs more sources to comply with WP:GNG but to be ranked on national or significant music or sales charts is indicative of notability, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: Meets  per Reveluv's and Kyle Peake's arguments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)