Deletion of Islamic language

Comment: As noted above, "Islamic langauge" is not a term because langauges are not intrinsically associated with religions. Not even Arabic. I believe that the user who created this page was banned from creating redirects, due to their propensity for making up terms.It's |snowing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per ; such a page is hugely misleading. Languages do not adhere to a religion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: It's a pile on at this point but I still wanted to cast a vote for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per . None of these languages is called the "Islamic language", and except for Arabic, they are only somehow vaguely associated to Islam; the criteria for what is included there are completely arbitrary, as we have found out in the talk page. ''No'' potential for a redirect, or a move to a coherent topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  and . There's probably a better way these languages could be in a list together, but this clearly isn't it and heck if I know what is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per  and . This is a ridiculous dab that does not disambiguate anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)