Deletion of Tropical cyclones in 2010 (2nd nomination)

Comment: 99% of our articles are incomplete and it's our clear |policy that this is ok.   also states clearly that "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:ATD)

Comment: WP:IMPERFECT is a policy and so is . I find that this is a notable topic and we do not delete notable articles because they are incomplete or they are too much work to update - or because the Wikiproject has not made it a priority to update the page/list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: moved from draftify)I'd really -close this. '''''Just because an article is incomplete doesn't mean it needs to be deleted.''''' Using HotCat, I added it to :Category:Tropical cyclone articles needing attention. Seriously, there are over 2.5 million stubs around Wikipedia. Do ''they'' need to all be nominated for deletion? No! I've changed from draftify to keep based on {{u|Andrew}}'s concerns about drafts, but still, I'm not letting this be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: No valid reason given for deletion.     You can't delete it because you are upset it would require work to fix and are upset a Wikiproject of volunteers is not doing that work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:INCOMPLETE)