Deletion of Sandra Ramdhanie

Comment: Well the |burden of proof falls to those arguing keep to produce enough  to meet . I conducted a  search on this individual and Facebook, IMDB, Twitter, and blogspot were the first things to come up which was not a promising sign. I did a search through Google Books and aside from her own published material, she's mentioned in passing a few times but nothing to warrant . In almost every case she was not the subject of the publication or even the chapter. The Irish News source was the most promising one but it's only one source. The rest may very well be good sources but I can't  them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:V)

Comment: Passes WP:GNG as far as I can tell. The refs are RS; at least the first three of them seem to provide "significant coverage", don't know about the others. But the fact that user Mkdw can't verify what most of these sources say is not a reason to dismiss them as non-existent. User:Panyd added most of those sources/did the research, and I have no reason to believe that she hallucinated the whole thing and the sources aren't real.  doesn't say that all sources need to be accessible to everyone on the internet. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)