Deletion of Stepladder technique

Comment: I am on the fence as far as notoriety, since the works cited are not very influential and no other work in the Scholar search or similar searches does better. On the other hand, this article has a serious  problem. For instance, the paragraph that starts with "Performance gains associated with the stepladder technique have been documented..." is straight out of page 995 of the Rogelberg et al. (2002) paper. I also have to wonder about the licensing claim supporting Figure 1, since that figure is essentially a copy of Figure 1, page 83 in the Rogelberg and O'Conner (1998) paper, which states "Copyright 1998 by the Educational Publishing Foundation". Hopefully a more experienced editor can advise how to proceed. But, as far as this AfD, once the copyvio is taken care of I wonder how much of an article will be left
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: Basically per the nominator of the article: ''there are sources'', and this is |all we need to keep the article. AfD is not cleanup. This thing needs improvement, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)