Deletion of Ryan Buell

Comment: coverage in Peoplehttp://people.com/tv/paranormal-states-ryan-buell-on-cancer-battle-i-had-to-go-to-deaths-door/, ABC (above), the Chicago Tribunehttp://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-10-18/entertainment/chi-books-ryan-buell-booksigning_1_paranormal-state-star-ryan-buell-interview and Enewshttp://www.eonline.com/news/336791/paranormal-state-star-ryan-buell-diagnosed-with-pancreatic-cancer, along with general coverage in the context of the show (I know notability is not inherited which is why I'm showing the other coverage) suggests he passes . Another way of looking at it - his legal skirmishes are all getting media coverage only because he's notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Plenty of sources about the person (not his show: the person) along time build a solid  case. "Sensationalism" is far from being an objective criteria, and it seems akin to a proxy for  here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Instead of being deleted, given that the topic is notable, has potential, and workable reliable sources, but has quality issues, maybe, per -I it should be moved to | draft namespace, to be improved, and eventually moved back to mainspace when it meets quality standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:DRAFTS)

Comment: and merge any |independent and non-al coverage to Paranormal State, the TV show Buell derives his extremely limited celebrity from. Then clean up the truly awful Paranormal State article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRIND||WP:SENSATION)