Deletion of Jeff Heimbuch

Comment: and further source, specially as WP:CREATIVE was not written to address a new director... and seems to encourage waiting until their works themselves become historically notable. HOWEVER, since his works ARE becoming notable (''The Ties That Bind (2009)'', ''Leeds Point (film)'', ''Elevator (2006)'') and winning awrads and gaining recognition, as writer and director, that notability is his. It must also be rememberd that CREATIVE is only a sub-section or  and its Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria|basic criteria, whch he is just now passing. If a person meets these basic criteria, there is no need to follow in through the subsidiary criteria in order to find some way to exclude them... specially as he does not pass the "secondary considerations" of , , , or  either. In these cases, guideline advises looking at  and , where a newcomer with growing notability is allowed consideration. Having (growing) articles on young writer/directors whose works are growing in recognition, improves wiki. Wiki allows that he is the sum of his parts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PEOPLE||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:DIPLOMAT||WP:ATHLETE||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: The "newness" of the director is not addressed by  because the "newness" is not relevant.  If his work is recognized as stated in the guidelines, then he is notable regardless of his newness.  If it is not, then he needs to reach that level before being considered .  You are suggesting to move the notability goalposts to include up-and-coming, which to my knowledge, has always been considered just short of meeting notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)