Deletion of Wikiracing

Comment: Demonstrates |notability through the coverage in |reliable sources - it's not naval-gazing, as long as we cover it in the same way we would if it were about any other subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. Some of the refs are derivative from  others or not from sources usually judged , and could be removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: mdash;Per  the nominator is assumed to want to delete, so isn't supposed to !vote.  Would you consider striking your delete (although not your comments, of course) to avoid making work for the closing admin?  Also, it's absolutely standard to point out that the nominator hasn't provided a deletion rationale if that's the case, as it is here; it's hardly a personal attack.  (I assume that that's why you're piping phrases to  here.  If I'm wrong, I apologize in advance)&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:DISCUSSAFD||WP:NPA)

Comment: Rotorcowboy, could you please point out where there was a personal attack? That would help others to respond to your accusation/implication. #WHATIS gives some examples of different types of personal attacks, as a way of helping editors understand what is a personal attack. Thanks for giving a reason for your nomination, but an "article" with the same name in Wikipedia space is not a valid reason for deleting an article in mainspace. They serve different purposes and a different audience. ikirace is part of a WikiProject (Department of Fun Wikiproject) and it's purpose is to humor Wikipedia ''editors''. A Wikipedia ''reader'' interesting in finding an article about Wikiracing couldn't be expected to search the Wikipedia space
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA||WP:W)