Deletion of Bambi effect

Comment: per  in the absence of sources that are substantially ''about'' the term rather than simply ''using'' the term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per the references found by 124-148.48.20, and see also this reference http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:AbU0vfWe6K8J:findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0412/is_n2_v24/ai_18838468/pg_2+Diane+Crispell+Bambi+Effect&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us (its a google cache of a lost page, but of a valid peer-reviewed Journal article) that shows the concept has been a real part of scholarly discourse since at LEAST 1996.  11+years seems a long time for a neologism, and there appears to be lots of real, scholarly discussion in reliable souces dealing with this concept.  Easily passes  guidelines, and this concept appears to be discussed enough by said reliable sources that it is also clearly NOT |original research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: A non notable |neologism without any |reliable sources to |verify otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: possible merge to a hunting article if appropiate, otherwise looks like 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)