Deletion of State citizenship

Comment: It seems to me that this article is getting worse since this AfD started, not better. It used to be that most of the sources used were actual statutes and court decisions. Granted, they were being taken out of context and misinterpreted, but at least they had some legal standing in the first place. Now we're seeing inherently unreliable |self-published sources being added, such as a personal web page on Angelfire. This article is in such poor condition that it would be best for people to stop editing it, let it be deleted, and then, if this topic is still considered worthy of an article, to start over from scratch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS)

Comment: per Roscelese. Much of the content of this article consists of rambling |original research, based on taking parts of sentences from various laws and court decisions out of context so as to come up with a |fringe theory about citizenship in the United States. Well, arguably, this shouldn't be considered "original" research, because I saw a lot of similar content in Usenet discussions before Wikipedia even existed. But in any event, the current content is almost worthless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Nobody seriously has accepted this article's premise since 1870, well before Wikipeida was created in 2001, after adoption of the 14th amendment.  Grig541 has properly analyzed the |worse errors in sourcing.  Even if reverted to a "good" version, this article is a |synthesis of |fringe-theory, |nonsense, and |original research. If we must keep it, |blow it up and start over
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SYNTH||WP:FRINGE||WP:BULLOCKS||WP:OR||WP:TNT)