Deletion of Struldbrugg

Comment: The |PROD process is only for uncontroversial deletion and it seems outrageous that such a respectable literary topic should be treated in this contemptuous way.  Here's a selection of sources demonstrating the topic's notability.  These demonstrate that  has not been followed as the nomination and PROD claimed and so either  or  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD||WP:BEFORE||WP:CIR||WP:HONEST)

Comment: per Piotrus. There's nothing other than short  style mentions which aren't enough to prove |notability. There isn't significant coverage in reliable third party sources. I would support including a dictionary definition at a relevant article about the fiction if someone bothers to add one. But I can't call for a merge if we're talking about a section that only exists hypothetically. Either way there isn't sufficient coverage to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF||WP:N)

Comment: I discovered this article through the pipe "Struldbrugg|a fate worse than death", and it was a great read. Think this is sufficiently passes  and we don't use essays for requirement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)