Deletion of Dwm

Comment: As Draketo said, "appears to pass ". If so, end this discussion and focus on finding additional sources (which are likely to improve in time anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I have started a discussion whether Linux.org.ru qualifies as a  at Wikipedia:RS/N#Linux.org.ru
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: repeated recommendation) — If major GNU/Linux sites care about window managers you try to delete (i.e. http://www.linux.org.ru/news/opensource/4578724 Article about Awesome was deleted from Wikipedia is one of top 10 discussed news of last month), it's enough to prove its notability within the Community. And there is really many secondary sources too, just use google and examine interwikies. Anyway, in matter of erifiability|Verifiability, the source code of software is most reliable source that can exist, so in this case, blogs should be counted as proofs of notability even if you doesn't consider is reliable in matter of verifiability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I've looked at all the blog sources given above. For most the author could not even be identified. http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=dwm.html&Itemid=29 This piece, written by Jack Woehr qualifies per  because he is a contributing editor to Dr. Dobb's, e.g. http://www.drdobbs.com/web-development/184416067, but the blog entry in itself is just a rant that hardly says anything about dwm besides "Anselm R. Garbe &al's dwm is pretty close to the ultimate." In his blog, Woehr also has an interview http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Conversation-with-Anselm-R.-Garbe-of-suckless.org.html&Itemid=29 with dwm's author, Mr. Garbe, but they talk about wmii and its predecessor, wmi, but not about dwm. Duh
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS)

Comment: Despite all of the keeps, |notability has not been shown
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: In order to satisfy Wikipedia's |inclusion criteria for standalone articles, the subject needs to receive significant coverage in |reliable secondary sources. Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources have failed should be removed in accordance with Wikipedia's |deletion policy. Zero sources = no article. It's that simple
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:DP)

Comment: First of all I naturally distrust articles that attract http://www.nullamatix.com/dwm-on-wikipedia-marked-for-deletion/ meatpuppetry and canvassing, to me this reeks of |using Wikipedia as a means of promotion.  Second, I fail to see what makes this a notable program, per |our definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:N)

Comment: Article in FreeXhttp://www.cul.de/data/freex62007inh.pdf is reliable source. It is paper magazine and it is written by specialists in that field. It satisfies . So there is a lot of other links, see before. I repeat that the problem of notability of free software is one of the most important in Wikipedia and is still under development. So each deletion that produces a wide resonance suggests that there is a lot of work to do for complete consistency of . I think that activists for deletion should use their free time and efforts reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability/RFC:Notability_of_free_open_source_software Notability of free open source software instead of destroying articles about such a popular=notable enthusiastic project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: I'm sorry but I don't feel that the article in FreeXhttp://www.cul.de/data/freex62007inh.pdf can be seen as a sole authoritative source indicative of the subject's notability. For one, I generally disagree that a single inaccessible source can satisfy . Secondly, and more importantly, the article was written by Tobias Walkowiak, who's been very active on on the software's websitehttp://lists.suckless.org/wmii/date.html and who is also listed as one of the ''"people are/were involved mainly in wmii and dwm development as developers and contributors"''http://suckless.org/people/Other_people
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)