Deletion of Amy Bechtold

Comment: this nomination calls the United States Court of Military Commission Review a '''''"marginally notable government commission"''''' -- as if everyone agreed that this was an established fact.  Well, heck no.  When did everyone agree to this?  What I think we all need to recognize is that complying with  both prevents us from inserting biased material into articles, based solely on our personal point of view -- it should prevent us from deleting material from the wikipedia based solely on our personal point of view.  The Bush administration, in its defense of its Guantanamo policies, have very strongly pushed the interpretation that everything that happens at Guantanamo is mundane, ordinary, predictable, and fully consistent with both the USA's own laws and the USA's international obligations.  Congress didn't agree -- that is why it passed the Detainee Treatment Act.  The Supreme Court didn't agree -- that is why it over-ruled the Presidency in three separate cases.  Many respected experts don't agree.  The wikipedia is not the GeorgeWBushopedia.  We are not supposed to only cover the Bush administration version of things
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Not enough references to be a standalone article - , per Synchronism
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)