Deletion of James Umar McConnell

Comment: I can't see any independent reliable sources - I can't see any independent sources at all in the refs list, save only the university - and that's a ref to the uni itself. No other indications of notability meet my eyes. BTW, I am not an engineer, just in case the creator thinks I might be, whatever it is that's wrong with engineers. Please do not use words like foolishness before YOU have considered Wikipedia's standards and requirements. Please see  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: I've edited it for  and , and the creator has also added some independent, eliable sources: links to two interviews on Australian ABC television. Notability is still weak, however, and most of the sources are , so more work is needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK||WP:NPOV||WP:R||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: There is no evidence at all of independent coverage. Nearly all of the references in the article appear to be to one cite to which McConnell has connections, and there is also at least one reference which at present is a dead link, and two to pages not mentioning McConnell. The arguments given above by BeNothing do not relate remotely to Wikipedia's notability criteria. I suggest that BeNothing may like to read otability and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)