Deletion of Timeline of Rob Ford video scandal (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is definitely a ''significant current event'', so  doesn't apply here. I don't see how someone could argue that this is "borderline BLP" either, as moving all the content back to Ford's article would be worse for BLP concerns. Since he just today http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24824651 admitted to smoking crack, there is bound to be an increased interest in this article. A discussion about changing the article title (if that is a concern) can take place on the article's talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is a questionable article, but to renom an article two months after a snow keep is against . I suggest a snow close
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELAFD)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a newspaper" is an essay that says articles should not be about "things with no historical significance whatsoever."  But this story, which has gone on for 6 months, has been covered extensively by media, and is the most complex story that local media have covered is of historical significance for the city.  policy says "editors are encouraged...to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events."  It meets the | Notability (events) guideline.  And Rob Ford easily meets the Wikipedia:Notability (people) as a "Major local political figure who have received significant press coverage."  He is mayor of a city with a population of over 2 million and the over 90 press sources for this article alone shows he has received significant press coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT)