Deletion of International Marxist Tendency (2nd nomination)

Comment: Link http://www.cpgb.org.uk/home/weekly-worker/804/oil-slick-divisions 1 is from a marginal source, the Communist Party of Great Britain, and thereby doesn't establish notability and fails to meet the test of  since it is by definition a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Questionable_sources|questionable source. Source http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/12/07/the-strange-tale-of-hugo-chavez-and-the-swansea-marxist-91466-27779250/ 2 is actually about Alan Woods (political theorist)|Alan Woods but it has only a passing reference to the IMT so it doesn't establish notability either, it fails 's standard that a source to establish notability must provide "significant coverage" ie "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". The Gleaner article http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20090607/focus/focus3.html 3 is an opinion piece rather than a news item, moreover the article isn't about the IMT and the reference to the organization is rather fleeting. http://www.bbc.co.uk/mundo/noticias/2010/12/101203_venezuela_chavez_alanwoods.shtml 4 like 1 is about Woods rather than the IMT, the IMT is only mentioned in reference to Woods belonging to it but there's no information about the IMT itself or its notability, it's also not used in the article. The other Spanish sources also do not appear to actually be in the article, the references to the IMT are fleeting and one is about Woods rather than the IMT. Again, article fails ,  and  and much of it remains unsourced original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:O)