Deletion of Rodan + Fields

Comment: While  language is grounds for a {{copy edit}} tag, it is not so for deletion unless the article is blatant .  This article is promotional in some aspects in tone, but not completely free of content.  There are not a ton of sources, but a cover story in an industry magazine (Direct Selling News) and an article in Forbes are a start.  Company did $200M sales and has a network of 50K "consultant"/salespeople. That is enough for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:CORP||WP:peacock)

Comment: per : just because the principals also invented Proactiv, does not make ''this'' company notable. I'd like to see much better sourcing and less peacock language before I'd change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)