Deletion of Ra (channeled entity) (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article satisfies |notability with the references provided, which meet .  does not apply here, since the definition of fringe in  is: "ideas that depart significantly from the prevailing or mainstream view in its particular field of study". The particular field of study is paranormal, ufology, new age religions etc., so how a well educated wikipedia user can claim the departure of the topic from mainstream view? Nevertheless, there are evidences of serious academic coverage (as if this is the criteria in wikipedia, you should educate yourself more on wikipedia policies and rules) in the field of philosophy by Stephen Tyman, and in the field of Transpersonal Psychology by Arthur Hastings. What relevance, of me having |ownership issues, is there with this AfD? Discussing is not throwing unsupported claims and fallacious arguments into talk pages with incivil style. Those "discussions" in talk pages and this AfD are just gaming the system to me , and definitely requires the intervention of arbitration committee
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE||WP:OWN||WP:GAME)

Comment: per my lack-of-sourcing arguments in the first AfD. I can find no in-depth independent coverage to have surfaced in the last nine months. ''Merge'' would also be reasonable, but Don Elkins already covers the relevant history in sufficient detail; maybe some of the philosophy could be included in line with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS)

Comment: No evidence of |“notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Doesn't meet any |notability criteria that I could see. Although the article appears well referenced, this is not in fact the case. Most references fail , and the one that could be considered a reliable, 3rd party, source, is only trivial coverage at best. All other sources are fringe, like the topic itself. The main editor also seems to have |ownership issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:OWN)

Comment: non-notable article based upon  sources. No evidence of mainstream media or serious academic coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)