Deletion of Beyblade timeline (2nd nomination)

Comment: Clear failure of #PLOT. No notability asserted to meet E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTE)

Comment: This is not a time line. This is simply a series of tables listing "attacks" which is trivial and has no context. Those in the previous debate that claim that there is no ban on fictional time lines were clearly judging the article based on its name only and not its contents. And even if it was a real time line, I question the encyclopedic value of a fictional time line. Especially in the face of  and the need to present a time line from a real-world perspective instead of an in-universe perspective. But all in all, an episode list is a better way to present a fictional time line. It at least satisfied the need to maintain a real-world perspective
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: fails  and OT; redundant to episode lists/volume summaries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: I am having a hard time making out exactly ''what'' is being listed. It appears to be a list of characters and what attacks they used, but a timeline it is not. The whole thing is a completely |sourceless mass of |plot summary and |trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:PLOT||WP:TRIVIA)