Deletion of I Am Become Death

Comment: Does the last batch of (speedy) keeps provide any other rationales than , #CRYSTAL, / and ? I am all for allowing an article to prove its potential (as Fish and karate notes), but hammering on potential forever doesn't get the job done at all. &ndash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:ATA||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:INHERITED||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: or make a simple list of the episodes.  Edokter "too soon to establish non-notability" is not how we work, in fact it's the exact opposite; we don't ideally create articles, or keep them, until notability is established, similar to  or to when young people who have some achievements (but not quite enough to have been noted widely and be independently notable in the press) write their articles here- we don't wait until they have achieved or not achieved something, we go based on what they've achieved in the way of notability at the time of the AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: In the future, should enough secondary sources become available, they can be forked off into independent articles. But after a merge content that is purely plot summary should be deleted per #PLOT in order to prevent a revert re-creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: and '''add some summary information in List of Heroes episodes'''. I strongly disagree by creating articles for unaired articles, expect exceptional cases. This is . Many Heroes episodes are good, have production notes and many other things but these fail any notability and consist only of plot. New pages should created only if an episode attracts that publicity that it is referenced in reliable third party media. Ratings should be added in the List of Heroes episodes. They will improve it as article, enforce its real world information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)