Deletion of Lump sum

Comment: The article's shortness is not a valid reason to delete.  Nor does shortness make the article a dicdef - please see  which goes to some trouble to explain that the view that shortness = dicdef is fallacious.  The nominator should please read that policy and also 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: no'' this is not "a highly notable fundamental economics concept." It is not an economics concept at all. It is in fact a ''very trivial'' accounting and finance concept. It is therefore highly unlikely that this article can usefully be expanded beyond a  stub. Should it be determined that ''something'' is required to avoid a redlink, I would suggest a soft-redirect to wikt:lump sum. (And ''no'', a single, rather vacuous, unsourced example ''does not'' prevent this stillborn creation from being a mere 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF)