Deletion of Semantic technology

Comment: A  AfD nomination style search shows shows about 6,000 hits in GBooks and over 7,700 hits in GScholar. There is a multiyear conference devoted to the topic, for which the papers are gathered and published in book form by Springer-Verlag, e.g https://books.google.com/books?id=Uw3NCwAAQBAJ&dq=%22Semantic+technology%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s. Among sources found after a brief search include a tutorial at a conference https://sites.google.com/a/clarkparsia.com/semantic-technologies-tutorial/ Semantic Technologies: AI Strikes Back and the survey http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574119214001989 Semantic web technologies in pervasive computing: A survey and research roadmap. Browsing GScholar shows a lot more reliable sources still. This topic seems ''highly'' notable per . The article is not well-developed and could use better sourcing, but the potential for improvement is there, per , and the article has surmountable problems, per . A highly notable topic and an improvable article suggest keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)