Deletion of Jerome Arkenberg

Comment: although redirects are , it is not clear to me that this subject is notable enough to warrant such a redirect. The scant article does not have the type of content that I think warrants such a redirect. The article should mention a contribution that is of permenant relevance to the article for such a redirect. Every reputable website has an editor and other lesser editors. These titles are fleeting. In the future there will be different editors if this website has lasting importance. Unless the article has content about his founding of the website, we should not point readers there via a redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)

Comment: to :Internet History Sourcebooks Project. This appears to be within the scope of  It's the Project that is arguably notable, not  its contributing editor Arkenberg
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: on account of subject failing . A cursory examination of the contested article's |sourcing makes the point evident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:V)

Comment: Being a "contributing editor" or editing other people's work doesn't show notability. Don't see that he meets  or the GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)