Deletion of Tareq Salahi (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is actually not a bad forum for discussing what amounts to the removal of an article from the mainspace. There has been sufficient nontrivial discussion focussed on the subject to pass , and surmount : the subject's role in the events was major, well documented, and spawned a lot of coverage of the subject personally which was persistent. It's certainly a judgment call whether one thinks that coverage was persistent and whether the subject is likely to become low profile. To the first, I do, and to the second, given that the subject actively courts media attention, I find the "low profile" of this subject to be a dubious proposition
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per previous AfD. Subject is notable for multiple events - even if he is mostly famous for one, sources can be found on other aspects and controversies of his life, therefore  is an invalid concern. More than 70 sources indicate that subject is absolutely |notable. Redirection or merging is also not an option given the huge amount of information which would not be relevant to the often proposed 2009_U.S._state_dinner_security_breaches|merge target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)