Deletion of I-O Data

Comment: The criteria for establishing notability for corporations such as  and  provide in-depth explanations on which references can be used to establish notability. Specifically, articles that rely on publishing interviews or repeating facts relayed by the company are not acceptable as they are not considered "intellectually independent". In my opinion, of the sources you have listed above, http://www.itmedia.co.jp/pcuser/articles/1312/16/news006.html this one from itmedia meets the criteria. The others appear to be interviews or company announcements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: I do apologize to others for the burden caused by providing so many sources. I just felt that some on this AfD were not looking properly at the sources I provided, so I erred on the side of volume (though not on quality). The problem, as I stated above, is that the Japanese media is protective of its content, and thus the major companies put their older material behind paywalls. That is what happened to the Chunichi article (they even prevent the Wayback Machine from archiving them--I just checked for that one). So the majority--and in many cases the best (because you have to pay for the best)--coverage is either in print or in for-pay databases. So what to do? In previous AfDs where I have cited off-line sources, most participants have taken it in |good faith that I am not making them all up and have used them as indication that RS exist (I don't recall an AfD where the article was subsequently deleted in such a case). We are, after all, not determining whether the article should be promoted to feature article status, but rather seeing if the weight of coverage tends towards . I sense that some here are not willing to assume good faith, so those participants may want to see the articles. I did provide the relevant bibliographic information for those who can use the databases or go to a library (which is what I did). The databases of all the newspapers I cited can be searched at any library in Japan and at many major research and even public institutions abroad. If there is a problem with not knowing Japanese, I suggest one solution: that someone neutral to this AfD or who has not yet participated make a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan for some members to check on the Japanese sources I have given to determine if they help satisfy , and/or to make additional searches to determine if those also help satisfy . I cannot guarantee a quick response (WPJ members are few in number and overburdened as it is), but this seems a reasonable option
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:FAITH||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Sorry for the delay in responding. I have been quite busy and this response required time I really didn’t have. First, I have been rather frustrated with this AfD. From the nominator to some of those voting, I have seen a distinct failure to either perform what should be done  nominating, or afterwards, to look beyond the existing article per  and perform one’s duty to consider the evidence presented in the AfD or to search for evidence on one’s own. Having participated in hundreds of AfD’s, this is nothing new to me, but I still feel the need to remind participants of what is necessary to participate in an AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE)

Comment: Unremarkable company, fails notability requirements. Fails  and GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The company is listed in the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (which is reserved for large corportations)http://www.nikkei.com/nkd/company/?scode=6916&ba=1. As  states, the consensus is that public listing by itself is not sufficient to establish notability, "However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion....Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not certain) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." A search of Japanese business and IT news sites finds plenty of coverage of both the company and its products: http://www.itmedia.co.jp/pcuser/articles/1312/16/news006.html, https://www.weekly-economist.com/2015/06/30/%E7%B5%8C%E5%96%B6%E8%80%85-%E7%B7%A8%E9%9B%86%E9%95%B7%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%82%BF%E3%83%93%E3%83%A5%E3%83%BC-%E7%B4%B0%E9%87%8E%E6%98%AD%E9%9B%84-%E3%82%A2%E3%82%A4-%E3%82%AA%E3%83%BC-%E3%83%87%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BF%E6%A9%9F%E5%99%A8%E7%A4%BE%E9%95%B7-%EF%BC%92%EF%BC%90%EF%BC%91%EF%BC%95%E5%B9%B4%EF%BC%96%E6%9C%88%EF%BC%93%EF%BC%90%E6%97%A5%E5%8F%B7/, https://www.advertimes.com/20150730/article199139/2/, https://www.nikkan-gendai.com/articles/view/life/159699, http://ascii.jp/elem/000/001/433/1433742/, http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/column/executive_dinner/1032660.html, http://internet.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/698060.html, http://www.itmedia.co.jp/pcuser/articles/1505/25/news002.html, http://www.stereosound.co.jp/news/article/2016/02/17/44212.html, http://mainichi.jp/articles/20161115/gnw/00m/040/005000c, http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/news/16/110203247/?rt=nocnt, http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/news/17/062801790/, http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/news/17/062801790/, http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/news/17/051701431/, http://www.excite.co.jp/News/market/20170626/Fisco_00093500_20170626_009.html, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)