Deletion of Royal Blood (band)

Comment: I find this a bit baffling. One might expect a search for "Royal Blood" to get a lot of false positives, but the first 3 pages of a Google seatch and the first page of GNews found all these: http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/dec/02/royal-blood The Guardian, http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01ky6g6/profiles/royalblood BBC, http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/bbcs-sound-of-2014-list-brighton-power-duo-royal-blood-set-to-be-saviours-of-rock-next-year-8976315.html The Independent, http://www.nme.com/news/various-artists/74922 NME, http://www.xfm.co.uk/new-music/great-x-pectations/royal-blood/ XfM, http://www.thisisfakediy.co.uk/articles/features/class-of-2014-royal-blood/ This Is Fake DIY, http://www.mtv.co.uk/news/brand-new-for-2014/399275-royal-blood-arctic-monkeys-matt-helders-glastonbury-t-shirt-was-surreal MTV. There's plenty of coverage around, easily sufficient to satisfy  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: Though the article does need some developing, the subject is notable as per . I agree with the users above that there is considerable inclusion of the band in independent sources that can be used for verification
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)