Deletion of Battle of the Line (2nd nomination)

Comment: on the grounds that reference 6 ("About Michael O'Hare's Departure". GEnie, via The Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5.) is a direct quote of series creator J. Michael Straczynski and therefore constitutes a reliable, non-fictional-world source per , regardless of its inclusion via The Lurker's Guide fansite; and further that references 3, 10 and 11 from The Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5 should constitute reliable secondary sources - since the WP article on the guide itself quotes Straczynski acknowledging "The Lurker's Guide and Grimm for his years of help and support, illustrating The Guide's significant central role in the development of Babylon 5 fandom, '''and the series itself'''".  The quote is from the Babylon 5 5th season DVD release (which in the context of the Lurker's Guide article is a reliable secondary source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per being a decently enough sourced |spin out of Earth–Minbari War.  A topic is not expected to always or ever be in the headlines, as long as sources expert enough in the topic discuss in enough detail. We do not |expect perfection as long as we DO enlighten our readers on the topic being discussed. I find the disparaging use of the neologism "fancruft" to not be helpful, as it is not policy nor guidelne, and even fan-related topics can be considered notable enough for a comprehensive encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: because the sources proposed either do not meet  (not independent or significant enough) or are not about the subject of the article. Those who /voted "keep" on claims that GNG is met or that sourcing is "independent"/"sufficient"/etc clearly need to take a closer look at , which they obviously don't understand
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)