Deletion of Vehicular homicide (Georgia)

Comment: articles. The content in each of the state articles seems to be almost copies (if not actually copies) of the laws themselves. As noted in , Wikipedia is not a place for public domain content that is meaningless outside of its original, unmodified representation. Even if the laws in each state were different enough to the point that a reader would even dream of visiting this article, the articles should at least be '''Merged''', considering one article with all the information would be more useful to the average reader than a bunch of stubs spread across the encyclopedia. (In fact, the very point of stub articles is to act as seeds for future expansion, and I do not foresee these articles going anywhere beyond mere restatements of state laws
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLINK)

Comment: I don't have a problem with the bundled nomination.  Each article is merely a statement of the individual state law with nothing more.  The existence of these articles add nothing to the main article.  If there were interesting case law associated, perhaps I'd be more inclined to keep.  As it stands, they are in line with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The listing of slight differences in fines and prison times for a particular crime in a particular state is unencyclopedic and fails #DIR. If the topic of ''differences in'' vehicular homicide laws of the 50 states has secondary sources, it may be possible to contruct a single article on the topic. I would prefer to see lay sources with plenty of interpretation and analysis to justify such an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)