Deletion of 2012 Texas A&M University shooting

Comment: passes .  does not apply here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: for the time being. I'm basing my opinion on ; let's wait a few days and see how things develop. At that point, we should have a much more elucidated perspective on whether this satisfies /CA|our notability guidelines for criminal acts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:N)

Comment: Will this shooting be notable in 5 years' time? No. Does it pass  and ? No
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT||WP:GEOSCOPE)

Comment: The sources cited in the article (all of which were in the article when it was nominated for deletion) clearly, unambiguously, and beyond question are sufficient to satisfy the |general notability guideline and no persuasive reason has been presented to disregard it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: I'm extremely skeptical that a shooting that made the front pages of Al Jazeera and BBC News will never receive a followup article anywhere in the world. At a minimum, the followup to this will be covered in Texas papers for years--investigation, "could it have been prevented?", funerals, anniversaries, memorials, etc. In any case, as Chaser points out, even the current level of coverage is sufficient to meet the , and there's no need to rush a deletion nomination per  (especially for a topic that has already generated https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=texas+a%26m+shooting&oq=Texas+A&gs_l=news-cc.3.1.43j0i3j0l9j43i400.3520.18099.0.19214.18.11.5.2.2.0.116.1064.9j2.11.0...0.0.. 52,000 sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RAPID)

Comment: Are we living in a world in which a campus shooting is not 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This article easily meets the notability requirements for an article.  I don't think  applies here, as it's not "routine coverage" of something like a store closing or a football schedule
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is, sadly, the kind of thing that happens all the time. The |only reason it got attention was the other shootings recently. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTNEWS)