Deletion of "Buddy" (Paranormal creature)

Comment: Among other issues reliability is a problem. Articles should be sourced from  sources. If they aren't thats a de facto  problem and a strong indicator of a lack of notability. Almost by defintion, if something is notable it will have |reliable sources that discuss the topic (cf for example Big Foot).  Furthermore if "The subject matter is of a specialized nature that is not necessary interesting or appropriate to a reader interested in reading about the town itself" then that is an argument if anything for further non-notability- people who care about the town don't even care at all about this sibject. Finally, the claim that deletion has a chilling effect on free speech has no bearing Wikipedia policy. A) Deletion doesn't have any chilling effect. B) More importantly Wikipedia is not a free speech zone but an encyclopedia, please see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: The coverage is not in |reliable sources nor is there any indication of general notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)