Deletion of List of one-time characters in The Simpsons (7th nomination)

Comment: If the characters are |notable, why do they not have their own articles or are not listed in List of characters in The Simpsons
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: as it is a renomination of an article kept multiple times in previous discussions.  The article concerns memorable characters from one of the top ten most enduring and significant animated franchises in history, i.e. despite the title, some of these appear in games and other merchandising beyond the show.  No one can honestly say they are not |notable.  Much literature has been written discussing characters from this franchise, which means that they are |verifiable through |reliable sources.  Moreover, per , the cited entries at worst are mergeable and because the article is not a hoax, not libelous, nor a copy vio, there is no urgent/compelling need to redlink it and thus protect the public from it.   is not a valid reason for deletion and there is no truthful policy or guideline based reason either.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Why do you cite ? I don't see how the page fits in there. Is it "too general or too broad in scope have little value"? No. It is a bit specific, but not horribly so. If this were a list of male one-time characters, then I might agree. After all, The Simpsons is a long-running show known for its many characters, so a listing of one-timers wouldn't be completely unuseful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)