Deletion of Abeokuta Girls Grammar School

Comment: Increasingly disappointed with this group of editors attending every school AfD, repeating the same "because it is so" arguments, dismissing established, broad consensus (, SNGs) and wikilawyering the recent RfC (hashtag #alternative fact|alternativeRfCs). And then another group, of which I seem to be part, engaging them in multiple venues, repeating the same "but... policies and guidelines? RfC? WP:LOCALCON? seriously?" pleas ad nauseum... If it's not given a free pass in one of our SNGs, and it doesn't pass GNG, it's not notable. I appreciate that notability, being based on existing publishing models, is one of the sources of systemic bias -- but the answer to notability's systemic bias isn't to just throw it out the window for some subjects but not others (unless, I suppose, there is broad consensus to do so in a way that reconciles it with core policies). I do wish this could be resolved in meta discussions rather than regarding several individual examples on top of meta discussions. Typically for this sort of thing, we'd hold an RfC to sort out differences and find consensus, but that just happened. If people simply refuse to acknowledge it, and the problem is widespread enough, is it possible the issue is enough in the space of behavior (as opposed to content) that it's something for ArbCom to weigh in on? &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I checked and found most of the coverage mentioning the school is about the school's most famous alumna, Funmilayo Ransome-Kuti. (She's not even mentioned in the article. Sad!) The articles are mere mentions of the school; not enough for notability. Coverage was otherwise not independent or not reliable.  doesn't apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: per |DEL8) because the school hasn't received significant coverage from independent, reliable sources as required by |the notability guideline for schools. |This requirement exists so that we can write verifiable, balanced, useful articles; it is not merely unlikely, but actually impossible, to comply with our content policies when writing about a subject that hasn't received significant coverage in trusted, unrelated publications. Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory, a Web host, or a social justice project, our content policies must prevail and this article must be deleted. There are, however, |alternative outlets that may gladly accept this work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (:WP:DEL8||:WP:NSCHOOLS||:WP:WHYN||:WP:OUT)