Deletion of Hollie Steel

Comment: Though it is still a bit y, I believe the the  argument is somewhat voided by the fact that it would be silly to have an article on Hollie Steel's appearance on Britain got talent instead of just this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per nom to Britain's Got Talent (series 3).  This is a 1E right now, and it can be broken out if something long-term comes out of this.  Right now it's three sentences and before I edited it down to that, it sounded like a grossly spammy press release.  It's hardly a snowball keep by the way, her near loss of an organ, unless reported at the time of her loss of an organ because she was, seems irrelevant.  She's hardly the only four year old to have had pneumonia when she was young.  Also, #DEMOCRACY and ; given she's been famous for two days now, it's really quite premature to have any substantial coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ATA)

Comment: The article is only a few hours old and the nomination does not seem to have considered good alternatives to deletion per .  Given the precedents of Susan Boyle and Shaheen Jafargholi, we can expect thousands of readers here looking for information and so it is absurd for this name to lead nowhere here.   is not appropriate because the person is the topic, not some larger event in which she played an incidental part
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:NOT#NEWS, . This is a textbook case. We spin out into articles ''after'' somebody has actually achieved notability for more than one event, not on the "we think they might" principle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per . Not everyone appearing on a TV talent show is automatically entitled to an encyclopedia article. Appears to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BIO)

Comment: Technically a delete as per Nom as she has simply passed a first round audition for a TV show and had one interview on American TV but nothing else on British TV. Nothing in the article of much interest, just where she comes from and her medical history. If she later 'places' in the contest would then come under  so would require the article to be recreated especially if Simon Cowell tries to exploit her. Can't see harm in keeping it open to save having to recreate it later. I know it is probably against 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:CRYSTAL)