Deletion of Lamont Lilly

Comment: I started the article years ago). Looking over the sources, I see multiple, independent sources covering the subject in detail. There are 2 interviews as well as sources detailing awards he has received. They're not perfect but there is enough to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the person meets our GNG. I suggest some serious clean up but  but not a deletion. The person is notable https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Lamont+Lilly%22+-wikipedia&sxsrf=ALeKk02wunfrasAEHzsN40NONQ6BrYBG5g:1599767563459&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiS_N7Krt_rAhUFa80KHcSMBJ0Q_AUoAXoECAsQAw&cshid=1599767626653187&biw=1010&bih=644 per the RS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: weak) I don't see an indication of notability outside of the local level, clearly doesn't meet  and fails  and  as well. The article has been |refbombed, but o amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability|no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. There is some good coverage in Indy Week, but multiple sources from the same publication (and a localized one at that) doesn't establish notability by itself for me. National sources only establish the non-notability of this person, see for instance https://www.cnn.com/2013/12/20/us/north-carolina-teen-vigil-violence/index.html this CNN article describing him as a "local activist". Worker's World newspaper is not independent and it seems most of the other sources quote him as a vox populi|MOTS, not establishing notability. I would like to see a clear indication that he is notable outside of Durham before considering him notable. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:REFBOMB||WP:N)