Deletion of PediaPress

Comment: This is somewhat self-referential, but it doesn't make any sense whatsoever for Wikipedia to put a "create a book" box in everybody's sidebar by default, and then declare the organisation behind this "non-notable". There might have been a case for moving the article to the Wikipedia namespace until the whole things gains more momentum; but as it's already received coverage from the The Graudian and others I'd say this case no longer exists. If the article violates the letter of any notability rules (I don't think it does), let's |ignore the rules' letter in favour of their spirit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: with complex rationale. I don't often cite , but I think this is one of the rare cases when it applies. -- I do acknowledge that by strict application of policy, this article should be deleted.  According to , "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."  In this case, Wikipedia's objectives as a free, online encyclopaedia and its open source philosophy are supported by the Wikimedia Foundation and Pedia Press directly and financially.  Let's not bite the hand that might feed us: I think it behoves us as Wikipedians not to delete this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:WIARM)