Deletion of Christian Stepien

Comment: Seems to fail  most of the '''''"references"''''' on the article are primary sources, web pages belonging to the subject and or his "publisher", there are a number of news releases none of which seem to have meet been actually published ''The person has been a primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Nearly all of the article's edits are done by the same user whose only contribution is to edit this article.  He has one other contribution, and that was to put this artist's name in a list on another article (see ).  Also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY||WP:BIO)

Comment: While I'm not at all convinced of notability here, I do want to sound a note of caution. Certainly nothing in the article ''as written'' passes our notability guidelines, but at least on the music side a couple of things point to the remote possibility that he ''could'' meet them under certain circumstances. As far as the magazines go, ''Chart (magazine)|Chart'' and ''Exclaim!'' ''do'' pass  criteria themselves, as they're the ''only'' two Canadian music magazines currently in publication which focus on a general readership (as opposed to a music biz insider perspective). That said, however, the ''type'' of attention the magazines give can be an issue: if either magazine has done an actual ''article'' on him, then he's certainly keepable, and if he's actually ''charted'' in either magazine, then he's certainly keepable. But if ''all'' he's got is one capsule review in each mag, then that doesn't really pass the "non-trivial" part of the core  criterion. Similarly, New Music Canada being what it is, the fact that he has a profile on there points to the ''possibility'' that he's gotten airplay on CBC Radio 3, which would give him  criterion number 10, but as I can't vouch for ever having heard him on there, I simply don't know if that's happened or not. So, to be honest, I'm a bit ambivalent at this point — if he has actually received more substantial coverage than what's currently noted in the article, then I'm willing  to change my position to keep ''if that information is added''. But if ''all'' he's got is two reviews and an NMC profile that's flown below Grant Lawrence's radar, then he's a '''delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Appears to be not internationally known and definitely fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)