Deletion of Bokhodir Choriyev

Comment: per . Article is so poorly written that I can't even suss out what his basic notability claim is supposed to ''be'', and the "references" aren't helping much: aside from being contextlessly linkfarmed rather than actually ''footnoting'' any of the content, one of them is an outright dead link that just lands blank, two more are dead links which automatically redirect back to the source's front splash page rather than to any verifiable content, one just namechecks his existence in an article that isn't ''about'' him, and one is a Q&A interview in which he's quoted talking about something other than himself and thus isn't its ''subject''. And while there's ''one'' source present that ''might'' genuinely be ''about'' him — it's written in Uzbek, so I can't personally evaluate its substance or lack thereof — it still takes ''more'' than just ''one'' GNG-worthy source to ''pass'' GNG. So no prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' somebody can write an article which ''properly'' demonstrates and sources that he passes a Wikipedia notability criterion, but this article as written isn't cutting the mustard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)