Deletion of Carlo Rendell

Comment: Not enough activity as a professional cricketer to allow sufficiently |neutral and |verifiable comments. No context for the expansion of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V)

Comment: Please remember to keep your comments |civil (don't insult others' intelligence).  That being said, if you can add |reliable sources confirming your claims to the article, it would be immensely helpful.  Even if Carlo ''is'' notable, his article could be deleted due to the lack of reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL||WP:RS)

Comment: Have you looked at , , , , ?  Those would explain why the websites given are not acceptable per wikipedia's standards for sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:BIO)

Comment: That is not how Wikipedia is set up. You do not need specific knowledge in a certain area to comment on AfDs or contribute to an article, nor should you urge anything of the sort. Please stay |civil, and become more familar with wikipedia's policies before making comments like this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: as nn-bio. Career consists of a single second-team match, so fails ricket notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)