Deletion of Lich (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: or '''merge''' given several  have been found per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Lich per above comments since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: or '''Keep''' The Lich article is pretty sparse, and could easily fit the DnD page into it. Though it could also easily become a . Not sure why this was brought to AfD when it probably should have just been a merge discussion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: to Lich, per above.  Taking out all of the in-universe plot information, there is not a whole lot that would justify this being  from the main topic.  Its already mentioned there, but its entry could probably use some expansion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: selectively to Lich. I don't know how this doesn't functionally fail  (per Rorshacma's vote) and stripping it down would leave enough for a paragraph or two in the other article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)