Deletion of 2013 Soldotna Airport Turbine Otter crash

Comment: to Soldotna Airport, so the article can be easily revived |if and when there is |ongoing coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: because the Wikipedia:Notability (events)|notability guideline for events is not met: there does not seem to be any ongoing coverage. All there is are initial news reports, which is not sufficient as the base of a Wikipedia article per . This air taxi crash (regardless of its death toll) is of no importance to the aviation industry, and as such finally also fails the  guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:AIRCRASH)

Comment: there's no |rush to delete this article as the investigation is still ongoing and may well result in changes to procedures etc.  In fact, http://ohsonline.com/articles/2013/07/16/alaska-aviation.aspx?admgarea=news this article implies that the authorites are looking very seriously into why so many accidents occur in Alaska.  Besides,  is just a project writing guide, nothing more.  I'm surprised that a crash which killed 10 people wouldn't be deemed notable enough for the aviation project, but then again, perhaps I'm not.  In general terms this is a notable event that has clear verifiable reliable sources to back it up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE||WP:AIRCRASH)

Comment: Meets the |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No, I would have no objections to that outcome. Despite claims above that there is "no consensus" on this AfD, the basis of the debate was that this article does not meet the Wikipedia policy  and all the "delete" and "redirect" comments have supported that it does not, which is clearly the case. The "keep" arguments to date have failed to show how this article does comply with Wikipedia policy and have instead relied on emotional or vague arguments. I am confident that the closing admin will weigh those arguments appropriately
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: to the airport article. At present there is nothing encyclopaedic to be said about the accident beyond what is said there. ''If'' there are significant and notable changes to anything as a result of the investigation that can not be summed up by the simple noting on relevant pages in the single sentence "Following the crash of a Turbine Otter at Soldotna airport in 2013 that killed 10 people, X was changed to Y." or something like that, ''then'' there will be scope for an article. At the moment though all we have is people "hinting" that there ''might be'' changes which is pure 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Aircraft#2013_Soldotna_Airport_Turbine_Otter_crash|discussion about this article at WikiProject Aircraft resulted in a consensus to take it to AfD. I just thought I would try going the  route to see if there were any objections first, knowing that we would probably have a full debate on the future of the article here at AfD regardless. Also what http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/09/us-usa-crash-alaska-idUSBRE96802O20130709 the ref you are referring to said was "the plane was an air taxi, which is held to a higher standard than general aviation aircraft", not that air taxi is held to a higher standard than airline flights. This is the same as saying that ground taxi cabs are held to a higher standard than private cars. In both cases it is true, but it doesn't impact the Wikipedia policy of  in any way
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)