Deletion of Silkheart Records

Comment: as per AllyD.  Furthermore, I am not sure that  is a fair criterion for ''any'' record label article: few, if any, record labels are notable, in and of themselves, minus their artistic rosters (e.g. what makes Atlantic Records notable, their logo?).  In 1991, ''Forced Exposure'' suggested that Silkheart "could easily be considered for the new ESP-Disk throne." (Source: {{cite journal |last=Johnson |first=Jimmy |year=1991 |title=CHARLES GAYLE QUARTET: ''Always Born'' CD; CHARLES GAYLE TRIO: ''Homeless'' CD album reviews |journal=Forced Exposure |issue=17 |page=87 |publisher=Forced Exposure, Inc. |location=Waltham, Massachusetts |issn=0893-5599 }}).  And yes, this was in the context of a Charles Gayle review.  But there were other Silkheart artists: e.g. Dennis González‎ recorded at least four albums for the label ("part of a determined effort to wrest creative initiative back from New York and the West Coast," ''The Penguin Guide to Jazz''), and Charles Brackeen (whom González‎ had coaxed out of retirement) recorded three albums for Silkheart
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: WP:CORP is immaterial and I take issue with its repeated dredging up in AfDs on labels. The label satisfies 's idea of a label with a significant history and roster. It is a culturally significant jazz label
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)