Deletion of Alice Soundtech

Comment: fails  &mdash; claims to notability are vague (what defines a "leading supplier"? who recognises them?) and originate from the company's own website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: IMO, the official Ofcom document analyzing the UK market and citing 3 main companies including Alice Soundtech would be quite enough for  alone, considering the governmental source and the fact that this domain isn't one popularly written about. And I think it's clear they're "an established name in broadcasting" to professionals in the radio business: being very notable inside a given domain is important even when relatively unknown to the main populace. (Full disclosure, I researched the above material. I am however not linked in any way with this company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: the references cited in this discussion amount to nothing but passing references-- they are evidence that this is a real corporation, but not eveidence that the corporation is notable.  And it appears from the history given that the article itself was created out of a motivation contrary to the spirit of .  This article is more of a directory entry than an article that anyone would truly learn from.  Developing it further would only turn it into an advertisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: I know I'm all involved in this and stuff, but this is a rather obvious failure of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)