Deletion of Stone of Tears

Comment: ill-conceived misuse of AfD.  Cleanup does not require deletion.  It just requires using the edit button.  This AfD is a clear candidate for being speedy-closed under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: OT includes "plot summaries" for the such when given their own article.  and notability guidlines both provide for these listed articles. The |notability of this article can be |verified through |reliable sources. Or |attibuted. I suspect that this nomination is either in bad faith or in violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:ATT||WP:POINT)

Comment: Nomination should probably be withdrawn as per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Tag with {in-universe} or something. And speedy close per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per .  If the topic is notable (which even the nom has admitted is the case), the article should not be deleted unless hopelessly unsalvageable.  That is hardly the case with these articles.  They can and should be improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: per .  It does need some context added to make it more than a plot summary, but easily passes notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)