Deletion of Noach (parsha)

Comment: While I have sympathy with those who have created and developed the article, I do not see any clear evidence of notability of the subject independent of the original texts. Thus, I cannot see how these articles meet  and . The fact that it and the others are written in a rather clear in-universe, POV way is another strike against them. The Catholic Church has a regular cycle of Bible readings as well, but I don't see any articles relating to those specific readings, even though they are probably more notable, given the greater size of that body. While I can and do understand that there are almost certainly homiletic works among others which discuss these readings as these readings, that material would, reasonably, also be more reasonable in the articles on the main subjects. I have to agree that this article, and probably all the others in this grouping, should be deleted as POV forks and otherwise violations of policy. This is not to say that they might not be acceptable for inclusion in some other WF site, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSOAPBOX||WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: per .  Honestly I feel the AFD nominator's reasoning is misguided and the objections raised aren't actually seen in the article.  Whether the subject of the article itself is notable was not questioned by the nominator, thankfully, and I don't really even see those here !voting to delete questioning notability.  Hopefully those who were thinking this is a POVFORK can now see the difference between an article on Noah the biblical charater, and this article on Noach the Torah parsha.  So, the other basic reasons to delete are:  "unverifiable" (violates WP:V) and "original research" (violates WP:NOR
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)