Deletion of Father Sebastiaan (2nd nomination)

Comment: http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/interview_with_vampyre_jNMD0OpvsmdsjuCookpqcM/1 NY Post, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-29/fangsmith-fashions-sharp-canines-for-world-s-many-party-loving-vampires.html Bloomberg, and http://eastvillage.thelocal.nytimes.com/tag/father-sebastiaan/ East Village all feature this guy as the primary subject.  That represents multiple (I've named only 3 of the best sources for notability purposes) significant coverage (he is the primary subject of substantial articles) in independent reliable sources (all those sources are mainstream media publications) which satisfy our |general notability guidelines.  Any issue of |conflict of interest can be dealt with through editting although I do note that at the time of nomination, I don't really see any issue with this article adhering to a |neutral point of view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COI||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Meets . Source examples include: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-29/fangsmith-fashions-sharp-canines-for-world-s-many-party-loving-vampires.html, http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/interview_with_vampyre_jNMD0OpvsmdsjuCookpqcM/1, http://eastvillage.thelocal.nytimes.com/tag/father-sebastiaan
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: for failing  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BOOK)