Deletion of Michael Jackson's Boys (2nd nomination)

Comment: the peer reviewed journal article, New York Times piece and book sources already in the article show that  is clearly passed and the delete votes are not policy grounded but based on , imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Can't find any third party coverage. May not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Sources in the article do not show significant coverage in independent RS, so it fails .  requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This page cites 2 sources (+ 2 AFD sources), but none of them have received reliable in-depth coverage. Most of the sources are  news reporting about sexual allegations against Jackson
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: as it aired on national television, as I seem to understand , and has an academic article about it. It could be improved, but that's not a reason to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTV)

Comment: per Atlantic306 and ChrisWar666. Easily passes . The article already surpassed the number of citations needed to meet  before it was nominated. The nominator clearly has a poor understanding of policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:TVSHOW||WP:SIGCOV)