Deletion of Richard Alan Miller

Comment: I could finds cites on Google scholar to give an h-index of 4 but, of course, this is nowhere enough for rof#C1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: I found some books on Amazon, but nothing via Google scholar. Nothing in EBSCO either. Not notable enough due to lack of independent secondary sources to pass . Also, you are right, lot's of editing done to promote subject, didn't help notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:FRINGE|Fringe researchers such as he appears to be need high-quality mainstream sourcing in order to provide an adequately |neutral overview of their contributions, and no good sources are visible here such as (if they existed) would let him pass . I'm not convinced that he should even be evaluated by  (the article portrays him as an academic but gives no evidence that he actually is one) but appears to fall far short of that bar too. Finally, more as a comment: I'm a little surprised that this was relisted. Three delete opinions (over that of the nominator) with some discussion but no dissent seems pretty clear to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)