Deletion of United States House of Representatives elections, 2012

Comment: Not .  This is a subject that is evolving right now.  Article needs to be fleshed out, but it will grow over time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: because I fail to see how this fails  and not having proper sources is not an argument for deletion by itself.  #1 on CRYSTAL states: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place."  This is a no-brainer here, as it clearly passes this.  Further, it is ironic that CRYSTAL includes the 2012 presidential election (the next election) as an example.  Surely we can extrapolate that to allow the next House article to stay.  Finally, as Mandsford says, we'll have relevant information very shortly - as they say, the next campaign starts the day after the previous election - so what's the point in deleting this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per Bds69, not a violation of . Sources ''are'' needed, but expansion of the article is a certainty
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)