Deletion of Amadeus Revenge

Comment: to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in popular culture. I wasn't planning to participate but I was really surprised by the above comments (and slight on the nom, who did due diligence), enough to look into the sourcing: First, the ABC "article" has nothing to do with the game. It quotes from MobyGames (user-submitted) in lieu of offering any |new analysis for notability purposes. If anything, it indicates that the title can be mentioned in a section or Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart in popular culture|article about Mozart's influence (hint hint). Second, the Retro Gamer "article" has exactly three sentences (!!) on the game as part of a list of games in a sidebar. Third, so essentially the case hinges on the article in the Italian hobbyist magazine Commodore Computer Club. But https://archive.org/details/Commodore-Computer-Club-53/page/n105/mode/1up?q=amadeus it too has little substance. Altogether, I'm not seeing how anyone can make the case that we can write a full encyclopedia article on this subject without devolving into |original research from primary sources. No case for |significant coverage has been made from these three existing sources. If any further print sources exist, in a field that has been very, very well archived compared to other disciplines, those sources are unscanned and unindexed and unknown to us. And we don't keep articles based on what might exist. There are a few different merge options as an |alternative to deletion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:OR||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ATD)

Comment: ABC and book cites are more than fine for . It's not like a Commodore game from the 80's is going to be profuse with NY Times and Wired articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)