Deletion of Lindsay Shepherd

Comment: If the only coverage of Shepherd was that related to the initial incident then this would be a clear delete but she has clearly decided to use that incident as a springboard for further activities and lasting press coverage so I don't see any lingering BLP concerns.  (I would also be fine with a deletion based on  as advocated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: This is textbook 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Subject has received significant and lasting coverage since the incident, and thus meets  and, more importantly, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: The coverage makes her a , not a person who has earned permanent notability by passing the |will people still be looking for this article in ten years test as of yet. No prejudice against recreation in the future if the material circumstances change, but nothing here is enduringly notable as of today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:10YT)

Comment: This is an obvious 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Wilfrid Laurier University#2017 free speech controversy where it is already covered. This person may become notable enough for an article if she gets enough on-going coverage for activism, like Monica Lewinsky and David Hogg (activist), but it is  for an article independent of the college's article. Salting or full protecting a redirect would be overkill
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: or '''Weak keep'''.  Clearly a notable story that deserves mention, but the individual probably does not satisfy 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Since the subject of the article has been well sourced and adequately describes the incident and moreover since this topic meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The only "sustained" or "lasting" attention is itself a blip &mdash; a non-notable award due entirely to the original, singular incident. Circumstances might change, and if they do, the article can be created anew. , . (Also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROF)