Deletion of Queen Sized (2nd nomination)

Comment: A clear pass of  having recieved in-depth reviews by The Hollywood Reporter, Variety and New York Daily News (Reuters is just duplicating what THR said and should be removed). I have also found a review on The Seattle Times http://old.seattletimes.com/html/television/2004118871_tvqueen11.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: as passes  with multiple independent reviews in reliable sources such as Variety, New York Daily News and Hollywood Reporter, thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Clearly meets  as per a perusal of available sources, including those added to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE)

Comment: Just like theatrical films, a television film is not handed an automatic notability freebie just because an IMDb entry offers technical verification that it exists: the notability test is the reception of |reliable source coverage ''about'' the film, such as actual reviews by newspaper or magazine TV critics. But besides the IMDb profile, the only other source here is a special-interest magazine reporting a blog-sourced ''rumor'' that this film's lead actor had signed to be in it, which is not enough to get this over the "media coverage" test all by itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)