Deletion of Bendigo street housing campaign

Comment: I'm undecided, but any "keep" decision would need to be conditional on removing all unsourced content per  and resolving clear  problems. Squatting and all its political or social implications was nothing new to Melbourne.http://www.australianmuseumofsquatting.org/?p=544http://www.australianmuseumofsquatting.org/?p=724http://melbournecio.org/?page_id=15 What made this special? Why isn't it part of a much broader article similar to Squatting in the United States
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV)

Comment: Main editing seems to be by an  but so what if it is referenced appropriately.   by an editor is not grounds for deletion if they present a .  This is not a single event.  This is not just news.  This is not simply a subset of the East West Link but has taken on a life of its own separate from the East West Link.  Yes there is some definite scope for clean up, but it is not a  either.  There seems to be quite sufficient  to support  in its own right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:NPOV||WP:TNT||WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG)