Deletion of Brokeback Mountain parodies

Comment: I don't think there is yet a workable definition of "trivia" that has community consensus.  Without such a consensus, I think calling an article "trivial" is not a reason to delete.  Even the page at  mainly focuses on trivia sections, and recommends that they be integrated into articles whenever possible.  I am not opposed to deleting things, I am a deletionist at CfD discussion.  But at AfD, I only believe an article should be deleted if it is clear that there is no way to create a reasonable document.  To my way of thinking, that means, pure drivel, a POV rant, a subject that is inherently impossible to cite, etc... This page is none of these.  In order for Wikipedia to succeed, we need to be tolerant of content that does not fit into our own image of what constitutes an encyclopedia.  One person's view of trivia will be another person's dissertation topic.  As Wikipedia is not paper, we can make a home for virtually any topic that can be cited and presented in an NPOV way.  The alternative, deletionist approach will just create rancor and bad feelings while diverting all of our attention from more important tasks. -- |&#x2611
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:CI)

Comment: Mostly uncited |trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)