Deletion of Dan Smith Will Teach You Guitar

Comment: Rather than stating "this is puffery piece", could you explain why it is puffery? There is very little praise about Smith himself (some has recently been added, but you could simply remove that and make it a neutral POV). Your harsh language and harsh, inappropriate tagging of the article make me wonder about Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|COI, which is frustrating as the nominator also seemed to show a vendetta against me, as this seems to have been nominated because of an argument I had with the nominator over speedy deletion policy. I have been trying to , and thank everyone who has made keep votes, but it is hard to keep a clear head with such accusatory tones and gratuitous mistagging (with errors) of the article. I have addressed the typos and left in the tags that were appropriate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: per  - new |sources, including the ''New York Times'' have shown notability.  |Past precedent here has kept such advertising campaigns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:RS||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Fails . Of the present references, #2 and #5 are broken, #1 is a NY Times naval-gazing self-centered piece more about the writer than about Smith, but still of some value, #3 is good coverage, but is "AOL Small Business" an independent and reliable source? #4 is not impressive, being an Amazon page seeking to sell a download of a song someone did which mentions Smith. Refs 1 and 3 are not quite enough to support a biographical article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)