Deletion of Hoagie Haven (2nd nomination)

Comment: Playing devil's advocate: the page could be said not to pass  because the coverage is all "local". However,  is a garbage guideline that should be ignored - according to what it says even companies that have received coverage in Andorran newspapers fulfil  but ones given coverage in "local" press of much larger areas do not fulfil . Additionally I see coverage at nj.com which counts as "state-wide" coverage. There might also be said to be  issues with this page, but I think it's as balanced as it can be. Finally I suppose it might be said to be purely  or even  but I think the fact it's popular with students at Princeton and to some extent appears to be a cultural phenomenon to them just about gets it over the bar on that. EDIT: To state the obvious the 2006 delete decision wasn't based on policy, since the relevant policies barely existed then, and should therefore be ignored for the purposes of this discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:AUD||WP:PROMO||WP:MILL||WP:ROUTINE)