Deletion of Meital Dohan

Comment: per http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0230525/awards and http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0230525/filmotype. While the article itself needs work for style and tone, the actress and her work and awards are verifiable and do seem to get coverage in sourceshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Meital+Dohan%22http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Meital%20Dohan%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&oe=utf8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp which would allow article improvements. I think this will be my improvement focus for tomorrow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:ENT)

Comment: I would ask that editors and the nominator consider how the article and sourcing looked when first nominated http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meital_Dohan&action=historysubmit&diff=444287299&oldid=435243273 and compare that earlier version to the improved version after I have addressed concerns.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meital_Dohan  I was able to find and the requested significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so as to |confirm meeting ,  and .  I believe my original reasons for !voting "keep" have been born out through only a little effort. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:CREATIVE)