Deletion of Australia–Iceland relations

Comment: Neither low numbers of tourists or resident nationals make for a non-notable relationship. Nor does low trade, low defence links etc. etc. Nor does the size of the nations involved; even "tiny" nations like Australia can have notable bilateral foreign relations (This was seriously put up as a ground for deletion in an earlier discussion on a similar article!). All of these claims are entirely irrelevant and subjective. Notability is established through reliable sources created by people willing to write on the subject. While these have not been found, the nomination does not even seem to suggest that sources have been looked for. There is a real sense of  in these nominations, which is not a ground for deletion. I wonder how much thought is going into the deletion discussions for these articles and how much of it is cookie cutter responses. Each article should be considered on its merits and this rush to delete needs some tempering
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)