Deletion of Mushroom Kingdom Fusion (2nd nomination)

Comment: without prejudice. Though MuZemike's sandbox version is a vast improvement neither of the sources used go near what I'd consider to be the letter and spirit of |notability in terms of significant coverage. At the very least articles need a single secondary source of moderate depth and misc. smaller sources, these are just signposts. It may be that more sources appear in the future but that's just a possibility
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: While no improvements have been made since the last AfD, potentially useful sources have been cited in there which should definitely have been brought up for discussion. Nom offers a |It's just not notable argument which isn't enough to delete, OR is a reason to tag for cleanup instead of deletion. For the sake of this present discussion I suggest evaluating whether http://www.joystiq.com/2008/01/20/super-mario-fusion-makes-mushroom-kingdom-hearts-a-reality/ This joystiq article and this http://kotaku.com/346207/super-mario-fusion-a-happy-marriage-of-halo-and-mario Kotaku review (and possible other, more RS) can be used in this case (both sources are considered conditional use by /S|the WikiProject VideoGames Sources List) and whether these are sufficient to rewrite a (much shorter) |Neutral Point of View article or not. I'd answer with a weak yes (hence my !vote). Not opposed to redirect to interwiki link either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:VG||WP:NPOV)