Deletion of Cppcheck

Comment: per the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Cppcheck%22 lack of |reliable sources. This software fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per 60.234.166.233's keep argument. Its own website is definitely ''not'' viable for evidence of notability. If there's no ''independent'' coverage of it,   fail. Even if that's the nature of the topic, that doesn't mean "a big fish in a pond that nobody fishes in" doesn't make that fish notable anywhere outside that pond. However, Static code analysis is an article on this general topic that could certainly use some work. That might be a good place to discuss the different tools, and refs for them there could be useful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)