Deletion of Brian Crecente (3rd nomination)

Comment: Find no reason under -REASON and the guidelines of  not to have this article. Kotaku is notable and is referenced often, he was editor-in-chief of a notable website which is consistently highly ranked. Under #3 of , "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Editor-in-chief is a major role. Kotaku falls under the scope of a work and it in often cited and commented about. I don't see this article as shameless self-promotion, while it may not be a great article it still merits inclusion. Msnicki, the lack of great sources in the article is not a reason for deletion, the requirement is verification and as a former chief editor it surely these would be acceptable mentions? http://www.industrygamers.com/news/brian-crecente-unplugged/ http://gamepolitics.com/2012/01/03/brian-crecente-leaves-kotaku-stephen-totilo-takes-over http://www.vg247.com/2012/01/03/brian-crecente-quits-kotaku/ E3 coverage aside, he seems to be regarded as an important figure in gaming journalism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: There are multiple claims of notability plus detalied coverage from GamePro magazine which cites Brian Crecente as one of the 20 most influential people in the video game industry.  It does not matter here if you  or not, this is still a subject to preserve
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LIKEIT)