Deletion of RapidVisa

Comment: fails . Only notable for being brought to court, but as the case was dismissed I do not believe the article subject is any different from other visa services and as such fails . Also, the current article seems to |promotional and was created by a UDP editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:MILL||WP:PROMOTIONAL)

Comment: Although it was made by a paid editor, this service seems to be notable. It has in depth coverage in |reliable sources. It passes . The specific criteria that could be contestable is whether or not the coverage is routine. I believe the coverage not to be routine, as the articles are not simple statements or notices that something is happening with the company. In fact, the article in The Colorado Springs Business Journal was published on Nov. 9, 2015, while the court thing was finished on Sept. 2 (at least according to what I understand of the source). Overall, this is definitely not routine, and I don't think that it is promotional either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: Not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes  or . Sourcing is basically either non-RS, trivial mentions, , or press releases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ROUTINE)