Deletion of List of films featuring powered exoskeletons

Comment: It seems to satisfy .  There are a few "list of ..." citations in the article.  I guess I'd prefer these short, random lists as categories, but  is pretty specific that they're allowed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: per , which says, ''"One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list."'' (Note: I created this list article.) There are several references in this article that list such elements—powered exoskeletons—out of interest for its readers. This Wikipedia article consolidates these references and additional ones per , ''"The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable."''  does not apply anyway because it applies to trivia sections, so very little actually applies here. If we were to apply it in spirit somehow, the section "Not all list sections are trivia sections" can apply here: ''"A trivia section is one that contains a disorganized and 'unselective' list. However, a selectively populated list with a relatively narrow theme is not necessarily trivia, and can be the best way to present some types of information."'' Clearly we have a "relatively narrow theme" here rather than "miscellaneous information", and this is a good way to present these items -- with references and bidirectional navigation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:TRIVIA)