Deletion of Umar Khalid

Comment: Classic case of  there's no need for an separate article for a low-profile person notable for only one event. He could be mentioned in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: It cannot be a classic case of  because the degree of significance of the individual's role within it should be considered in such circumstances. We have seen that after the event which was held on 9th February after which controversy erupted which led to his arrest under Sedition Law and subsequent bail by Court, he is still being covered by national and international media. So, it is not a single event. It has surpassed single event criteria. Now with the passage of every day it is becoming multiple event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: What's the difference between Kim Davis (county clerk) and Umar Khalid. One is an American. One is an Indian. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:GEOBIAS)

Comment: The rationale of  went out the window when this guy got coverage again and again and again. I think single event is one of the weakest rationales to be mentioned here. Notnews is the same. I mean how does one call something "just news" which is covered by reliable sources for a long period of time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: Borders  and  as well. The parent article 2016 JNU sedition controversy is sufficient to cover these individuals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWHOSWHO||WP:CFORK)

Comment: Per  or . I find no significant coverage of this person before this single event. He could be mentioned in the main article of the event, but there is no need to have a separate article for him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: WP:SINGLEEVENT and fails |notability.. He is a "symbol" of something but only within JNU walls
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Has been a subject of constant media coverage ALONG with JNU controversy and Kanhaiya Kumar  for over a month now.  suggests : "However, if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified". There have been various media coverage items profiling specifically Umar Khalid, both in positive and negative light, apart from his role in JNU sedition controversy.  e.g. Media reports linked specifically Umar Khalid with Jaish-e-Mohammad and then Govt denied the report. Umar Khalid was reported to have visited Pakistan twice by the media. Hence  may not apply here. May I also add that apart from Kanhaiya Kumar, other 6 students who are charged under sedition were not covered like Umar Khalid and Kanhaiya Kumar.  would apply on those 6 students but not Umar and Kanhaiya. I would urge people opining Keep as well as Delete, to purely judge this on the basis of coverage in the media, and not their own subjective views
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: per . This person is a low-profile student notable for only one 2016 JNU sedition controversy|event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)