Deletion of New Zealand – Norway relations

Comment: While the concept theoretically qualifies for an article, in practice this article lacks references (read: content entirely) and is an |OR target (as it appears they don't have any official foreign relations). /USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I've considered the additions and the articles on the talk page, I don't believe together they indicate significant relations: one off state visits (these 2 countries rarely have state visits), the fact that NZ acted with 11 other countries, tangential link of an Asian Pacific religious conference that was based on a conversation with the Norwegian PM. http://www.newstext.com.au/docs/MAN/2005/get.jsp?docid=MAN-20050316-1-008-4053705V6@NSW-CUMBERLAND-2006-2005 this article has nothing to do with NZ. it is about the Norwegian Church in Sydney, '''Australia'''. http://www.norway.org.au/ this link is for the Norwegian embassy in Australia whilst it has responsiblity for NZ the site is primarily about Aust-Norway relations. http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-130251342/nz-could-host-religious.html this article is not really about actual relations between Norway and NZ.  http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/08/31/aust.tampa/index.html this article relates to the famous Tampa affair in Australia which was a huge diplomatic incident between the governments of '''Norway and Australia'''. NZ offered to take asylum seekers on behalf of Australia but there was no actual dialogue between Norway and NZ, it is pure  to suggest this incident somehow adds to Norway-NZ relations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: for lack of sources discussing the topic, per . We've been redirecting these to "Foreign relations of ..." either of the parties, so that's a fall-back option
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)