Deletion of Inaccurate claims or bias of Sean Hannity

Comment: Even the title may constitute an |NPoV violation, as well as a |POV fork.  If it cannot be included in the Sean Hannity article in a neutral and concise manner without violating , then it cannot stand alone as a fork or split-off either.  Is this turning into a |snowball yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:POVFORK||WP:BLP||WP:SNOW)

Comment: There are no citations on this page, little if any encyclopedic information, and it is a clear POV fork.  While this is not in itself a criteria for deletion, the user who created it has made no edits except for this article and is the only editor of the article (with the exception of the person who nominated it for deletion.  I definitely am no fan of Hannity, but it is clearly a POV fork and a POV-pushing article, which both violate |the most important policy of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: By definition the article can't adhere  with this title
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)