Deletion of Erotic spanking

Comment: as #Wikipedia_is_not_censored|Wikipedia is not censored. This is a notable topic covered in a sensible manner. The whole point of Wikipedia is to have a breadth of coverage that is wider than a "''normal encyclopedia''". There is nothing ridiculous about erotic spanking that I can see
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:ISNOT)

Comment: Speedy''' - it's a legitimate topic. #Wikipedia_is_not_censored|Wikipedia is not censored for content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:ISNOT)

Comment: WP:SNOW|snowball's chance under this dogpile. Fram and Ssbohio have said all that needed to be said. Notability and Verifiability established. POV is not an argument for deletion, but for improvement. See , "''The argument "non-neutral point of view" (violates WP:NPOV) is often used, but often such articles can be salvaged, so this is not a very strong reason for deletion either.''" CyberAnth needs to remember that Wikipedia is not the place to "fight the good fight". There's plenty of free blog sites out there. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: per #Wikipedia_is_not_censored|Wikipedia is not censored. The article needs more citations for |verifiability, but the subject matter is certainly otability|notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:ISNOT||WP:V||WP:N)