Deletion of Beep Beep (band)

Comment: per nom.  I see a lot of dissing of that annoying  - I realize it's terribly inconvenient when you can't meet it's requirements and the article gets deleted, but that's what we have, folks - change it if you can, but it's the same playing field for everyone in the meantime.  Speaking of which, I see no reason to invent new policy/guidelines when the old ones still hold.  Band  fails  for lacking charted hits, national tours, multiple non-trivial articles by third parties.  "Copious" Ghits described above are confused by a lot of sound effect notations ("beep beep"), download sites, blogs, and music sales, which is why you don't use Google as the sole arbiter for notability.  Notability of their label is not to be confused with notability of  the band - at best, this suggests the band should be merged with the article about the label
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: only one album on an independent so doesn't meet  on that front but, as  is hopelessly outdated and there are copious G-Hits for "Beep Beep"+"Saddle Creek" http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Beep+Beep%22%2B%22Saddle+Creek%22&meta=, I think it should be retained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: this may not meet WP:BAND, but it seems to meet  which is more important: I found several articles on them, including from the Boston Phoenix: http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JSE/is_291/ai_n9489179 http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/music/otr/documents/04489600.asp http://www.sfstation.com/beep-beep-a986, et cetera.  However, someone really needs to clean up this article, it doesn't say jack about its subject; it's barely even a stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)