Deletion of Nepal Tribune Media (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: I couldn't find any coverage through either google or news searches. Even searching for the name in Nepalese generated no meaningful results. What is on the page is essentially  and there aren't any sources extant with which to make it otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: article as it stands does not meet , lack of coverage in reliable secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per nom. 100% agreed on all counts. Furthermore, related articles Kathmandu Tribune, the digital paper output by the company, and Arun Budhathoki, the founder of both, all deserve deletion. I don't think there should be any controversy on any of them. This is obviously one guy trying his damndest to publicise himself via wikipedia. Arun Budhathoki should be deleted as per . Arun Budhathoki cites a list of pages, that attribute authorship to the subject and none that discuss the subject itself. So, it fails  miserably short of synthesis which would be . I bring these up only because I have previously encountered a similar network of wiki articles and corresponding sources which as a whole would make the case quite clear and yet, it becomes harder than it should be when each article is taken one at a time. Because, well, we have "national media" like "Kathmandu Tribune" where friends can write puff pieces about each other and exchange favours writing wikipedia articles about each other citing these same "credible media sources", and so on. If editors would look in on all three of these articles, and provide their feedback, I/we could proceed with putting the other two up for discussion as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:GNG||WP:OR)