Deletion of General Wade Eiling

Comment: WP:ATD is not some kind of magic anti-deletion argument. You have to show how this content can be better used to improve another. Merging pure plot summary generally tends to make articles worse, not better. This fails to meet the standards of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is a lot of info out there on the General and he definitely meets the . Special:Contributions/122.60.173.107|122.60.173.107
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The nomination is unconvincing as it lacks evidence in support of its assertions.  There are obvious |alternative to deletion and, as that policy states "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.''", that's what we should do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: No amount of editing can make a subject notable if the sources do not exist. The Keep votes do not mention any sources. Article does not have  ''"addressing the topic directly and in detail"''.  &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)