Deletion of Smart Pistol

Comment: Per Piotrus. As the article's creator, I am fully aware of the qualifications for  and I believe this article fully passes them. The sites cited are some of the most major game journalism sites out there. This just seems like  and the nom has refused to discuss whether the article is notable and isn't assuming good faith. Per Piotrus, there is one article entirely about the Smart Pistol's gameplay implications, and many numerous mentions. There's also https://www.htxt.co.za/2017/03/20/3d-printed-smart-pistol-from-titanfall-auto-aiming-bullets-not-included/ this article that hasn't been integrated into the article yet about how a real life prop version was created, and https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/02/ars-plays-titanfall-editors-share-their-thoughts-on-the-beta/ an entire article by Kyle Orland about how good the Smart Pistol is that I should be adding in shortly
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: per Piotrus and Zxcvbnm. There's multiple sources covering this with substantial information, including out-of-universe context about its development and its real-world significance. It clearly meets the  and I don't even personally see any issues with  material based on how it's currently written, though if it arises it can be dealt with through the ordinary editing process. Could even grow into a  with more work (particularly scaling back some of the heavy quotations in the reception, but that's a whole other discussion, and only helps establish notability for this current AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:GA)