Deletion of Victorian Firewood

Comment: I cited |indisciminate information for the prod as the article is highly specific to the use of one product (firewood) in one region (Victoria) of one country (Australia). Articles on British Ketchup or a Card games played in Atlanta would be similar examples of information I'd consider indisciminate because they're ''too'' limited in scope. Rather, as I suggested at Talk:Victorian Firewood, the useful information within this article could be split amongt articles such as wood fuel (currently source-less and lacking any Australia-specific information), ''Eucalyptus camaldulensis'' (which lacks detailed info on its deforestation & use as firewood) & deforestation (which lacks a section on Australia), for example. |POV prose can be fixed, but nothing will change the fact that this article is far too narrow a topic, existing as an amalgamation of information that would be more appropirate & useful in other articles. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:POV)