Deletion of Catherine Harrington

Comment: The sources provided consist: of a list of characters; biography of the author with a reference to one page (which admittedly I can't see on google books); and a book with essays on feminism in TV, which talks about the Catherine Harrington story in one paragraph (incidentally this ref is repeated). I don't think these sources consist of significant coverage. The main scholarly work is an essay about "Peyton Place and the Rise of the Single Girl". This source would be great in the main article talking about the influence and ideology of the series. At the moment it is in a fork from the main article, which few people are likely to stumble across, and in which the character gets a pretty brief mention. In terms of the  criteria ''"Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive"'', which is basically what we are interpreting here, I would say that we are much much closer to the trivial than we are to the exclusive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Complete lack of sourcing (independent or otherwise).  Fails , other deficiencies (, ) notwithstanding. //USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Article meets all wikipedia guidelines. Sections are well referenced, the rest can be edited via 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)