Deletion of VT iDirect

Comment: per #G11; it's blatant advertising with or without an OTRS-logged release. If that isn't acceptable, '''delete''' per ; while AfD is not cleanup,  is still a valid deletion rationale, and this article fails it. If the article ''is'' cleaned up to the point where  doesn't apply, consider my !vote "speedy keep". &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:NOT||WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: I'm sorry, but this clearly falls under |wikispam. Depending on how you read it, it's either a clear attempt to advertise or act as a PR piece. Neither is acceptable here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)