Deletion of Michael Hendricks

Comment: I was |canvassed on my talk page by {{u|Thsmi002}} but I would have found this through watchlisting academic deletions in any case. In his talk page message, Thsmi002 asked me whether Fellow of the APA is enough for #C3. I'm a little skeptical, because it's not the highest distinction of the APA; that would be a different level, "distinguished fellow", and https://www.psychiatry.org/join-apa/become-a-fellow the APA's description page states that "excellence, not mere competence, is the hallmark of an APA Distinguished Fellow". That suggests to me that the lower fellow level rewards "mere competence" and is therefore not enough. The reason I think this should be a keep anyway is #C1. His papers (found by searching Google Scholar for author:Michael-L-Hendricks) have citation counts 365, 185, 116, ... with an h-index of 12. To me that's clearly above the threshold of notability (if still somewhat close to it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS||WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets  #C1 and #C3. I wrote the page after seeing that Hendricks is a Fellow of the APA and reviewing his citation counts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: In addition to the above, being a Fellow of the American Psychological Association is a https://www.apa.org/membership/fellows/index.aspx mark of special distinction and passes #C3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)