Deletion of Vasiliy Krivtsov

Comment: redirect to book''', the book would fall under  and the credit of the book has to be divided between  three co-authors the papers listed above have low citations, thus making him fail . This is pretty much confirmed by the analysis of JoelleJay, he is an average professor for his field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NPROF)

Comment: simply because you feel that a field is not well represented in Wikipedia does not mean that it is  a good idea to add people that may not be notable. His https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=7hHC9BAAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao GS lists 1500 citations and a h index of 12 which is pretty low to pass  and clearly his movie roles are too minor to pass notability. Also testifying in front of congress, especially simply representing your company, will not pass  . {{u|Sarouk7}} please come up with a more substantial argument based on  and  or I fear the article will get deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NPROF)

Comment: The book appears to be notable. But he's only one of three authors and it's the only thing that stands out to distinguish him for scholarly research. I don't think one book (unless maybe one that is really famous outside its own topic and not merely notable) can be enough for #C1 or . That leaves only -based notability for his work at Ford, and I don't really see the sourcing for that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)