Deletion of Namahn

Comment: per . It's quite blatant and just not notable enough. It would require extensive re-writing and referencing to be worthy of remaining
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)

Comment: Namahn was the first user-centered design consultancy in Belgium. The article satisfies the notability requirements as set forward in . References to scientific research and publications, whitepapers, lectures could be added
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: unless more evidence of notability is presented. GoogleNews returns only 6 hitshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&q=Namahn&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn, at most 5 of which appear relevant. There are two foreign-language sources referenced in the article. I'd like to know what they are about. Perhaps someone with necessary foreign language proficiency can provide a summary here. (Strictly speaking, some kind of translation of selected portions should be included in the article, per ). I am fairly skeptical at the moment as for a truly notable company I would have expected more coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:RSUE)