Deletion of Bluefield Technologies

Comment: This topic falls well short of our standards for notability. There are no indications of notability for this topic within the article, it is essentially a startup that has some seed funding and has participated in some startup competitions. The references appear to be from reliable sources (as is usual) but fail the other criteria for establishing notability. Run-of-the-mill business listings in Crunchbase and Bloomberg fails . Articles that rely on company announcements and press releases fails . Articles that rely extensively on "fascinating conversations", "IEEE Entrepreneurship chats", quotations and interviews fail  and/or . Articles that are mere mentions-in-passing such as the https://www.forbes.com/sites/valleyvoices/2017/04/04/how-to-win-big-investing-in-the-space-2-0-boom/2/#1eb01c172f3d Forbes reference fail . Topic fails GNG and , none of the references pass the criteria for establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: as obvious spam excluded from Wikipedia by . The question of the GNG is irrelevant as  makes it clear that a failure of NOT means that something does not pass the notability guideline. Since this falls outside of the scope of Wikipedia (as defined by NOT and ), the evaluation of the sourcing is a secondary question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM||WP:N||WP:5P)