Deletion of Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

Comment: According to , the procedure followed here is correct. {{tl|prod}} is for deletions that aren't contested. I didn't anticipate any contest as many other articles about cameras have been deleted without contest. Once the prod was contested, I tagged the article for discussion about deletion, which is AfD. That processes lets both sides be heard
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: OK, now that I've (finally) read  I will offer an apology
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: Article has been nicely expanded by RenniePet and additional references added. And there is a news reference http://www.news.com/Panasonic-broadens-SLR-ambitions-with-L10/2100-1041_3-6205276.html here.  Satisfies |notability per sufficient |reliable sources. The nominator's directory argument does not apply, as anyone and anything is a entry in a directory of some kind and OT#DIR applies to entries with absolutely no other significance. As an example of a misapplication of that concept, all articles on cars, such as the famous Ford Mustang or the Model T should be deleted because Wikipedia is not a directory of automobiles. Reviews are perfectly good sources as they, per  provide ''...significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject'', and they are used in other articles. And other camera articles got deleted under the radar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:N)