Deletion of Debbie Rowe (2nd nomination)

Comment: It meets the basic rule  ("significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") with multiple citations banked up at reputable sites like The New York Times http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/r/debbie_rowe/index.html, USA Today http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Deborah+Jeanne+Rowe, CNN http://topics.cnn.com/topics/debbie_rowe etc. Media coverage extends over 13 years, from 1996 http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20142911,00.html to the present time http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/30/debbie-rowe-photog-911-attacked-with-a-bat/. No brainer, headed for |snow country
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SNOW)

Comment: While granting that the subject is only famous because she married Michael Jackson and is the mother of two of his children, the publicity associated with her doing these things is so extensive that it warrants having an article about her in Wikipedia. See . As indicated by others above, her notability has not changed since the prior nomination back in July
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily clears . She has extensive coverage in reliable sources and while she may have come to fame by marrying Jackson since then she has received extensive coverage for events that she directly participated in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)