Deletion of List of Luxury Cars

Comment: Regretfully''', as its a good initiative that ''maybe'' could work ''somehow'' in another context, but just this title requirement makes it terminally . For eg. there's no universal industry concept of 'luxury'-  an example (off the top of my petrolhead) would be UK/European and US perceptions of the Vauxhall Omega aka Cadillac Catera. I can foresee endless such issues with a low chance of resolution and hence an article that's going to end up all templates and Talk Page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: It does not cite any relevant |reliable, independent sources, and there is no clear or objective definition of "luxury car
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Lists and categories may duplicate coverage.  I don't feel that it constitutes original research to compile a list like this as all it requires is finding a secondary source (say, Road and Track) to declare the car to be a luxury car and then it goes on the list.  If, perhaps, we were making a list of "ranking of luxury cars from best to worst" or "list of unappreciated luxury cars" or something along those lines, we would be right to declare the article OR.  As it stands the list is exceedingly bare (and includes an open wheeled race car...), so I'm not worried about the list introducing editorial content.  I've advocated deletion of lists in the past without some "unifying secondary document", but I don't think this list needs one.  Literally all we are looking as is "Luxury yes/no" for inclusion.  As for claims of , I'm not so sure.  IINFO is there to prevent lists of arbitrary classification or minimal standards from ballooning--an article on "Russian expatriates" or an article on "the times someone said 'centipede' on a TV show" would fit under this category.  In this case the list can't possibly (by definition) be more indiscriminate than the List of cars. This one is a keeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)