Deletion of ERPNext

Comment: WP:SPAM|Advertising: ''...designed to be easy to use and ideal for small businesses.''  It has a ''core innovation''.  |More |back office software advertising on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:B2B)

Comment: With ref to  It says if there is a verifiable third party coverage on the topic it can be retained, please go through these links 1:http://www.pluggd.in/open-source-erp-software-erpnext-297/ 2: http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/09/four-short-links-21-september-2.html .Pluggd.in  has around 5 million page views per month acc to wiki. The second link is from Oreilly radar which has mentioned erpnext as a good open-source choice for an erp. I hope that is sufficent enough to satisfy the criteria.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/120.63.18.92|120.63.18.92
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: Fails the GNG, fails , lack of reliable independent sources and admitted COI issues.  Given that the only Keep proponents are SPAs who've proffered no arguments beyond  and , why is this still an open AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:ITSUSEFUL)