Deletion of Nova Scotia Barristers' Society

Comment: as author). As a Bar, the organization impacts everything lawyers do in the province, from letting them practice (the famous Bar exam) to removing their ability to do so, setting the cadre and guidelines on professional conduct, etc. As such, I believe it is inherently notable, much like a court system would be. Yes, it's a stub, and I don't have time nor the interest to research the matter and to make a more complete article out of it. I have provided two news references where the Bar is mentioned prominently. Regardless of my view that the Society is inherently notable as the statutory body for NS lawyers, if the CBC, CTV, the ''The Chronicle Herald'' and other media outlets think the NSBS http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/21007-yarmouth-lawyer-under-scrutiny is http://www.capebretonpost.com/News/Politics/2009-11-21/article-774717/Barristers-society-grapples-with-mayors-comments/1 worthy http://www.capebretonpost.com/Living/Faith/2007-09-15/article-767691/Barristers-society-coming-to-Membertou/1 enough to make the news, it passes . I have only researched in some specific media outlets, but I'm sure with more focused research one could come up with more evidence of notability. Best regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think that this is probably notable for a number of reasons, but it's not notable simply ''because'' it is inherently so (bar associations are not the same as the licensing bar, depending on the jurisdiction; I don't know how Canada works, but in the U.S. most bar associations are private organizations that licensed attorneys ("members of the bar") may or may not be required to join, and there's nothing inherently notable about that), nor is it not because it simply doesn't have a lot of google hits. AfD needs to be based around , not ghit counts. It's not a speedy keep either. We have specific criteria for |speedy keeping and many of them imply some bad faith in the nomination. This is '''not a speedy keep''' candidate by any stretch of those guidelines. It is, however, a keep imho
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SK)

Comment: Easily meets ; in addition to what has already been noted, I'm seeing plenty of coverage in The Canadian Press. A few examples
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)