Deletion of Peter William Wade

Comment: OK...if speedy delete is not appropriate, I'll change my vote to '''Strong Delete'''. Despite this editor's denial of |conflict of interest and that the article is nothing more than pure promotion, s/he contradicts him/herself by writing (see above), "...This site provides me with an opportunity to celebrate their personal accomplishments." Sure sounds like pure promotion to me. |Wikipedia is not about paying tribute to anyone or anything. Another thing, an article about the subject's brother doesn't belong on Wikipedia, either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOT)

Comment: Under contract?" OK. That is a strong indication that this article is promotional and that it clearly violates |Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. While having a conflict of interest doesn't mean the article should be deleted, in and of itself, it does raise serious questions about its credibility and reliability. An indepedent third party should have written it. Doesn't matter who else has an article. That's irrelevant. If merely being on Survivor makes one notable (which I'm not sure I agree with), I'll go with the consensus on that. Notability is subjective, in reality
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)