Deletion of Count Maximilian von Götzen-Iturbide (2nd nomination)

Comment: Having read the keep ''!votes'' above and the responses thereto, I concur in that consensus: heads of deposed dynasties are notable ''ipso facto'' in real life as reflected in coverage of their claims and/or doings, and a list of coverage having been provided in earlier discussion means that sources are available for an article distinct from general inclusion in House of Iturbide. There has been discussion of coverage of royalty, reigning and deposed, in the past, for e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Farahnaz_Pahlavi&diff=99282133&oldid=99268761 here, that I think is more compelling and useful than the blanket |Notability is not inherited essay (not a |guideline), because it recognizes and accepts what people ''do'' find notable, rather than attempting to restrict Wikipedia articles to what we are told we ''ought'' to consider notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GUIDE)