Deletion of Sanrakshan

Comment: Per Nom as not notable. Five sources were given but these were debunked by the Nom and u|User:Eggishorn agrees but hoping more is "out there" and it seems feels concerned there is a language barrier issue which is likely. The article either has less than reliable sources or the same source as repeat which does not add to notability. I will offer that something can be considered generally notable in one area or location (such as Nepal) but not in another area or country which means not everything from one Wikipedia will necessarily be world-wide notable to be in the enwiki or others. If nobody else can weigh in with Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent |reliable sources providing |significant coverage then it just isn't world-wide notable. Other than a good faith search it is not the |burden of those checking to be able to also determine the notability but the proof is according to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BURDEN||WP:VERIFY||WP:significant coverage)