Deletion of List of ornithologists and their proper name contributions

Comment: I'm going to have to agree with Animalparty here. This just isn't the way this information is organized anywhere else. Obviously, our articles about various taxa indicate their naming authority, and our articles about the taxonomists ought to mention at least a few of the important taxa they authored. I can't quite justify calling this a "trivial intersection", because that isn't exactly ''why'' this isn't ever done this way. But it isn't, and I think one way or another, this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: This info should be on the individuals' pages, and I don't see much point in reproducing it in lots of little tables here. If this page was converted into a list of ornithologists who have named taxa, with links to their articles, that might merit a keep (although is that information elsewhere?). I'm reluctant to argue delete if there's a reasonable possibility of transforming the page into something useful (fD says a page shouldn't even be nominated if that possibility exists). But as it stands, there's only the germ of an useful page here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)