Deletion of Easycore (3rd nomination)

Comment: Fails . I also did a search for other sources in the usual places and found nothing. It seems unlikely that any reliable sources will now be forthcoming as this neologism has not taken off, so prevention of a recreation (since that since inevitable otherwise) will be necessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I disagree with failing . There are sufficient sources to make this notable, just by checking the sources links andhttp://www.bing.com/news/search?q=easycore&FORM=NWRFSH Bing news. I do believe that there are too many subgenres of pop punk and hardcore punk, where one could just make up a name for a derivative work. However, this doesn't mean that this subgenre shouldn't receive the same fair shake as each of the genres located on List_of_hardcore_punk_subgenres. This article would definitely need expansion to match the quality of the rest of them though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: complete lack of attention from reliable sources. The sources provided, and the ones which survive at :fr:Easycore|our French-language article, are content farms and fan-built or fan-submitted blogs. It's possible that this was used at one time by one pop-punk band to describe itself and/or one of its tours, but that does not make it a notable genre. |Reliable sources writing about it make it |notable, and there just aren't any. Redirecting to pop punk is also unadvisable: per the previous deletion discussion, "easycore" can refer to several very different genres of music, but if we don't have content describing any of them, then redirection is unhelpful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)