Deletion of Countdown to Destruction

Comment: per . This was a popular children's TV series. This particular episode is singled out as one of the series' "great moments" in http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/0823084566/ref=sib_rdr_dp this book (p. 193, with preview in amazon). The article gets several thousand hits a month. I don't see who is served by deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:SENSE)

Comment: due to improvements, i.e. notability has been established by substantial and significant coverage for our purposes.  Article clearly meets otability.  Well done!  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as |Wikipedia isn't a TV Guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: I agree, it is a notable finale of a notable show.  Google book search shows four results for "Countdown to Destruction" AND "Power Rangers" http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&q=%22Countdown+to+Destruction%22+%22power+rangers%22-inpublisher%3Aicon&btnG=Search+Books.  Not sure if any of them count.  Most of the news search results were from tv.com.  Children shows don't get the media coverage that other shows get, so you aren't going to be able to find news sources talking about it like they do every episode of the Simpsons or Battlestar Galactica.  Millions of people watched this show, it therefor notable by rule of |common sense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:SENSE)

Comment: Notable finale of notable show.  Finding sources for this seems easy - only took a minute to find a good encyclopedic source.  Should be kept for further improvement per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: For five years this article has been in need of reliable sources and still suffers from having none. The subject simply lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and therefore fails the |general notability guideline. Being a plot-only description that lacks a discussion of the reception and significance of the work is also an example of |what Wikipedia is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT)