Deletion of The Symbolic Dimension: An Exploration of the Compositional Process

Comment: per http://www.google.com/search?q=%22The%20Symbolic%20Dimension%3A%20An%20Exploration%20of%20the%20Compositional%20Process%22%20source%3A%22-newswire%22%20source%3A%22-wire%22%20source%3A%22-presswire%22%20source%3A%22-PR%22%20source%3A%22-press%22%20source%3A%22-release%22%20source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&sa=N&hl=en&tab=nw the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22The+Symbolic+Dimension%3A+An+Exploration+of+the+Compositional+Process%22 lack of |reliable sources. This book fails Wikipedia:Notability (books). The article contains several sources, none of which establish notability:1. http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4761054/Cite http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4761054/Cite &ndash; this entry in a catalog does not establish notability.2. http://www.australianmusiccentre.com.au/article/composer-notes-january-2010 http://www.australianmusiccentre.com.au/article/composer-notes-january-2010 &ndash; a one-sentence mention does not constitute the "significant coverage" that is required by |the general notability guideline.3. http://www.amazon.com/Symbolic-Dimension-Exploration-Compositional-Process/dp/3838308662 http://www.amazon.com/Symbolic-Dimension-Exploration-Compositional-Process/dp/3838308662 &ndash; Amazon.com is not a reliable source that establishes notability because this page is one of many in the directories of this book-selling website.4. http://netnewmusic.net/profile/KatiaTiutiunnik3/ http://netnewmusic.net/profile/KatiaTiutiunnik3/ &ndash; Self-published blogs do not establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence at all of notability. Article was created and largely edited by a single purpose account with no editing away from the topic of Katia Tiutiunnik. LivingMuse is also a single purpose account, editing only about Katia Tiutiunnik, and the two are stated to be colleagues of one another. Is there perhaps a |conflict of interest involved? I have also found off-wiki reasons for thinking there may be. (Incidentally examination of the two editors' contribution history convinces me that they are genuinely two different people, and there is no sockpuppet involved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)