Deletion of Raymond MacDonald

Comment: You can pick out his scholarly works on Google Scholar by searching for author:raymond-ar-macdonald — I thought at first that this included false positives, but he really does seem to be highly cited both on musical identity and on pain sensitivity. His highest-cited work, ''Musical Identities'', is actually an edited volume, so it should not count for as much. But he has another eight publications with triple-digit citations, I think easily enough for #C1. As well as multiple edited volumes, he is also coauthor of a new authored book, ''The Art of Becoming: How Group Improvisation Works''; I didn't find reviews, so there's no second pass of notability through , but that is easily explained by the book being too new for the reviews to have appeared. He may also pass ; I'm not so familiar with that standard, so I'm not going to try to guess whether he does, but coverage of his performance can be found by web and news searches for "Raymond MacDonald" "saxophone", and https://www.allaboutjazz.com/raymond-macdonald-man-with-two-brains-raymond-macdonald-by-duncan-heining.php https://www.list.co.uk/articles/raymond-macdonald/ https://www.marlbank.net/posts/raymond-macdonald-interview http://www.pointofdeparture.org/PoD49/PoD49TravellinLight.html https://jazzjournal.co.uk/2021/02/25/raymond-macdonald-gogs-maclean-sass/ look like significant coverage, at least. Perhaps the nominator and first !voter were intimidated by all the search results for other Raymond MacDonalds, but some evidence of  would have been helpful
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:MUSICIAN||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: as he passes  criteria 1 as defined by very well cited works as shown by google scholar so he deserves to be included and have the article improved in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: fails , per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The citations look solid for  C1.   looks a little unlikely to me, but reviews sufficient for  for his recording work appear to exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NCREATIVE)

Comment: I agree with CommanderWaterford, per  it is sufficient to use University resources as these are sometimes the only resources we have. So the question is does he pass SIGCOV or NPROF, to me it seems like  he may potentially be noteable as an artist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)