Deletion of Time Boss Parental Control

Comment: Had a search round, but couldn't find anything in |reliable sources that asserted notability. Of the existing references, I think anything that says "Network edition of famous award-winning parental control" without saying what the award was, combined with a tenuous grasp of English, is about as reliable as the gasman turning up to read my meter at the actual time he said he would
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I did the initial prod of this article, about which I wrote: {{tq|Non-notable software. I looked, and couldn't find any |verifiable and |reliable |independent |third party |sources with |significant coverage.}} That's still the case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:CITE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:third party)

Comment: as |spam.  The "external reviews" are really just ads written by the software's publisher on various sites.  The article author's edit history indicates that he might be related to the software's publisher, as he has published only article's about their products
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)