Deletion of Raymond Gilmour

Comment: passes  ''The person has been a primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per Jdorney, Coelacan. Vintagekits  and IrishRepublican appear to be forgetting our quaint  policy. Some people would applaud the subject's career as a fink, no doubt rather more than would find it "unfortunate". ''Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?'' Diplock courts? I'm sure you'd never find something like those anywhere else (hmm: Special Criminal Court; Offences against the State Act 1939
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: agree with nom- this person, if he even exists is non notable- the article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: From : "''The person has been a primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person.''" BBC.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6325241.stm Belfast Telegraph.http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/article2212293.ece Primary subject of both (that's multiple) articles. Notability indisputable. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)