Deletion of Bert Biscoe

Comment: does not meet  overall fails  and does not meet  for published books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Agree does not meet . Poorly referenced including a list of every reference they appear to have even been tangentially referenced in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: I regretfully concur that this does not meet  and the level of available sources does not reach  either, the list of references show a valiant attempt to show what there is, yet it is unfortunately not significant coverage of this man
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not sure what this massive list of "refs" is supposed to be not a single one of them satisfies |GNG and certainly isn't independent reliable '''coverage'''. And neither does anything else I can find
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per . Local political figure with the usual amount of routine coverage. Nothing exceptional or in-depth to demonstrate notability. The sources discussed on the article talkpage are primary sources such as his profile on the Cornwall Council website, his own website or sources such as local blogs - not independent, reliable secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: unless the article sees significant |improvement before close. Nothing here constitutes an automatic presumption of notability just because he exists, if the sourcing present in the article isn't sufficient to get him over  — and while it's true that an article can be deemed to pass GNG if adequate sources exist even if the article isn't up to scratch yet, it's not enough to just ''say'' that adequate sources exist: one has to ''show'' hard ''evidence'' that adequate sources exist, such as the actual hard results of an actual search. And even if this does get deleted, that doesn't constitute a permanent ban on his ever being allowed to have an article — if somebody can write and source something ''better'' than this, they ''are'' allowed to try again. But we can't keep an entirely |primary sourced version just because somebody ''asserts'' that stronger sources exist somewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: The subject appears to be one of 123 on the Cornwall Council, and most of these other councillors will also have similar, routine political coverage of their opinions and positions in reliable new reports.  exists because not all elected officials are notable for simply doing their jobs, but I'll wait to see if anyone posts a "claim to fame" that rises above this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)