Deletion of Consciousness technology

Comment: The term itself does not appear to meet , and the current article is yet another essay masquerading as science
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and consider SALT due to determination to re-re-recreate the article despite multiple references to policy).  Of key importance to an assessment of  is the final paragraph in which they suggest that practice of this trademarked process is limited "by law" to practitioners whom they themselves have trained.  I don't believe this would ever pass  in that no specific references in respected peer-reviewed publications are being offered, although a lot of big names are sprinkled throughout the article.  Unfortunately, Google searching is somewhat hampered by the frequency of use of each of the individual words of the protologismic name, but no one seems to me to find this "technology' valid except its own practitioners
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:FRINGE)