Deletion of Giapo

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:CORP)

Comment: I have added in the National Business Review and Scoop references, as well as toned down some of the self-promotional language to maintain a  | neutral point of view. Full disclosure: I do consulting work for Giapo, as well as being a Wikipedian committed to making Wikipedia better. I can disclose that as well as the sources linked to in the article, Giapo will also be covered on TV3 news sometime during summer. A reporter from TV3 was there yesterday, specifically focusing on how Giapo uses social media to build a solid community in less than a year. That same community shows fanatical loyalty; as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Certainly there are less notable articles that this floating around WP but IMHO most of those should be removed. Ideally notability should be established by some solid |secondary sources. A short mention in one magazine does not qualify. And from what's been offered there is no good reason to think that will change. Whether it has the largest cone or the largest ball of yarn is not really relevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:secondary source)