Deletion of Comparison of United States presidential candidates, 2012 (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article violates several aspects of . It is also |NPOV in that it lists only some and not all of the candidates. The writing style leans heavily toward favoring one of the candidates. And following the 2012 election the article will have little or no value. Wikipedia is not a guide, it is not a newspaper. And not meaning to get into the "other stuff exists" argument, but unless similar articles retroactively list the platforms for the candidates in all previous elections back to George Washington, this article has no place on Wikipedia. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;→&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The bits of referenced material are |synthesized and mixed with a whackload of  making this entire attempt to be partisan and inappropriate.  Even the formatting - why is "Obama" in the right and "Romney" on the left - after all, O comes before R alphabetically.  Such random choices makes this ed overall.  Delete and burn with fire
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:BIAS)

Comment: and add this to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is  a voter's guide (though I hope we don't have to add that example!) and the "subject" of the article is one that would be near-impossible to cover while respecting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: full of |original research and synthesis; omits most of the candidates; violative (IMHO) of , as being a voter's guide (and a malformed one at that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (:WP:OR||:WP:NOT)

Comment: I don't know how this article can be written without original research, especially at this stage in the game. If anything, any "comparison" doesn't serve an encyclopedic purpose. Reporting views and allowing people to think for themselves - ok. But it's not appropriate for us to be |arbitrarily deciding this for others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Article of campaign talking points; a non-salvageable train wreck replete with bias and |POV problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)