Deletion of Retrograde force

Comment: Simply |original research by synthesis.  If there were numerous independent sources that drew together the skeins of this essay in exactly the same way, and defined the title exactly the same way, that would be different; this material is irredeemably |non-neutral
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: this is a textbook example of  (and the kind of content that policy is meant to prevent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: per  and , and the sooner the better. - Dank
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Article fails to present any evidence whatever of the notability of "retrograde force" as a concept beyond what the bare use of the words would provide. Yes, Churchill used it. We don't have articles on every phrase Churchill used. Instead, it includes bald assertions by the author - in that sense, it fails both  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N)