Deletion of Luciano Fadiga

Comment: I think this guy does meet  and . If you search for him using http://www.google.co.uk/books?q=Luciano+Fadiga&btnG=Search+Books&as_brr=0 Google Books and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Luciano+Fadiga&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Google Scholar he is widely published, mentioned and referenced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: I submitted this for speedy deletion because there is no assertion of notability in the article and the subject fails .  This was not in agreement with the administrator who converted it to this AfD.  What significant research contribution is given in this article?  If it is his participation in RobotCub, then he is no more notable than the other http://www.robotcub.org/misc/robotcub_people/ dozens of people involved in the project.  If it is his neurobiology research, then I don't see how it rises above other professors' work.  There does not seem to be any large, independent review of his research and definitely no review outside his research area.  I have worked in multiple research labs and his body of work does not stand out from any other researcher's contributions in their fields.  There does not appear to be anything to add to this article.  He correlated brain signals in monkeys and humans (and he didn't even find the location in the brain that directly correlated to the monkey's F5 section) and he works on RobotCub.  That's all there is to his research and that doesn't meet the requirements of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)