Deletion of List of sources about claims that Vojsava Kastrioti was Slav

Comment: per nom. and  could be added to those arguments. Wikipedia articles can't be used as blog posts of source collections
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Wikipedia is not started for beeing a directory of sources or a repository of links ( and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:LINKFARM||WP:NOTLINK)

Comment: There is little mention here of what seems to me a fact of elephantine unambiguity and obviousness, which is that this nomination is made by one of the participants in a longstanding edit war, and that the loss of this many citations can only have been a detriment to the articles concerned. There is even a related rule:  # 2, distinctions #2 and #4. It was bad behaviour to create the new article, but worse to own the old articles in such a way that the author was moved to create the article. I have no sympathy whatever for this nomination or its political ends, both on Wikipedia and abroad
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SPEEDYKEEP)

Comment: both articles into the article on the principal subject, per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:AVOIDSPLIT)