Deletion of Wescorp Energy Inc.

Comment: I've declined speedy...the article has 3 refs, which is an assertion of notability, therefore it is inelegible for speedy. Discuss here the merits of the refs and whether they meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Per A7. Article reads like a CV for the company and also feels like dvert. I'd hate that an article on WIKI might tend to increase profits for stockholders, as searchhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Wescorp+Energy+Inc.&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= finds me http://www.wescorpenergy.com/ their own website, http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=wsce.ob a report on Yahoo finance, http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/default.aspx?cik=1069489 stock statistics, http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/wescorp-energy-inc/index.html a overview at topix.nytimes.com, http://www.stockcloud.net/stock/WSCE another stock report, http://www.alacrastore.com/company-snapshot/Wescorp_Energy_Inc-2111525 a "company snapshot", http://www.straightstocks.com/stock-watch/wescorp-energy-inc-otcbb-wsce-interview-highlights-proprietary-technology-for-oil-gas-industry/ an interview with the company chairman, http://quote.morningstar.com/Quote/Quote.aspx?ticker=WSCE another trading report, http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS127755+26-Jun-2008+MW20080626 a Reuter's artcle, http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=WSCE.OB a businessweek report for possible investors, etc, etc. I do not find anything that shows any special notability. It has coverage, but as much coverage as any business with stock for sale might expect. I believe it does not show notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:CORP)