Deletion of Erverh

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NEO)

Comment: Wikipedia is about |verifiability, not truth. I have yet to see a |reliable source mentioning that "erverh" is the correct pronounciation. Self-published books and random websites do not count. We also do not need to wait for experts in order to delete it. (Besides, how can we tell who's an expert and who isn't?) The |burden of evidence is on the editor who wants something included, not the other way round
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BURDEN)