Deletion of Armando Lloréns-Sar

Comment: First of all, I don't see any evidence for any mob mentality in this discussion. Spend a few seconds reading  before you make slanderous remarks about the intentions of the editors here. Second, about Armando's intent to keep his identity private, I have never heard anyone else claim that Stanford University and NPR are obscure entities. Moreover, it seems to me that both sources were ''voluntary'' opportunities to speak publicly and seemingly Armando agreed to have his (semi-)full name ''and'' both his affiliations (attorney and blogger) be used to identify him for those occasions. So the alleged interest in his privacy seems to be a rather new thing, and I'm sure Armando understands the dynamics of the internet well enough to realize that if any information is posted on any website it is very much in the public domain. I was very sympathetic to proposals to keep his full name out of the public domain before, but with the new evidence I fear it's an open and shut case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: I do not believe the history of the current article is useful for the creation of Armando (blogger), as it has no sourcing. I would not use it in a clean-room recreation, and the redirect created by the move would be , requiring a deletion of the blanked page at A L-S after it was deleted. AFD is perfectly appropriate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: in its blanked state for now until  issues are handled. While the outing was trollish, and I respect the desire of many of you to not reward such poor behavior, Armando the Blogger is a notable blogger (one of the top bloggers at one of the top blog sites in the world), much more notable than the vast majority of other bloggers, and more notable than many tv and newspaper media commentators that we have articles on.  Armando the blogger has already confirmed much of what has been reported, all we lack is a good citation. As a follow-up message to his diary, he has written on DKos: ''Who I represent is being posited as an issue. I can't put my clients in the middle of my politics.'' (by Armando on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 07:33:36 PM PDT). While he may want to deemphasize himself as a public figure, ultimately his real life issues can not be hidden from view on this encyclopedia any more than Limbaugh's drug issues can be (in fact, Armando looks quite good by comparison, since being a lawyer is not a crime ;-). The article needs to be NPOV and well cited, but deletion is not the answer (and will be appropriately overturned once proper sources are available). So we should just leave the article blanked and protected until a properly cited article can be written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)