Deletion of Anwar Brett

Comment: The quantity of his writings don't qualify him for an article per , nor do they mitigate 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BLP)

Comment: per the lack of |reliable sources. A http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Anwar+Brett%22 Google News Archive search returns articles where the subject interviewed people; none of the articles is specifically about him. I reviewed http://www.exacteditions.com/exact/browse/325/338/2688/3/6/0/ this source from the ''Post-Gazette'' (titled "New mag has cinema Focus") and find it insufficient because the article is mostly about a free, pocket-sized magazine, with Anwar Brett being the editor; there is little biographical information. http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2000/06/16/taye_diggs_interview.shtml This article from the BBC is insufficient because it is an interview conducted by Brett and thus does not count as Wikipedia:Third-party sources|a third-party source. The rest of the sources in the article are either unreliable, passing mentions, or a combination of both. The lack of reliable sources about Anwar Brett means that this article fails Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Notability (people) and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I agree, I'm not really finding anything for secondary sources here. Definitely doesn't meet otability. As for the article itself, it could almost be speedy deleted per {{db-a1}}. Looks like notability has been met. I've changed my opinion here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)