Deletion of Courageous (film)

Comment: ndash; This film is getting dozens of Google News hits every day. This is not a conventional film, and really isn't notable as a film and its principal photography. It is the ''centerpiece'' of Christian film, and had a worldwide announcement that anticipated thousands of people and brought dozens of media outlets to a church servive. (Literally, the film has 5,000 Facebook fans overnight.) The film, although yes, it is still scripting and casting, is clearly notable (per ), and I've added yet another source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: For several reasons.  #1 - Dozens of reliable sources about the film with more being added every day.  #2 - This entry will just become a point of contention for those who want it deleted vs. those who want it kept and, as it will need an entry later on anyway, it doesn't make a lot of sense to delete it now.  #3 - The  policy. This entry improves Wikipedia, so it's quite alright to ignore , which is just a guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNORE||WP:NF)

Comment: I heard about this film today, and soon checked to see if there was a Wikipedia entry. If there was, I assumed that it should be deleted as not be notable yet. However, the film has received a reasonable amount of media coverage, more than I was aware of. Even if the plot and such are still in production, and thus usually considered too future and unconfirmed for an article, the |RS coverage sways me to support keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)