Deletion of Pia Parolin

Comment: although v reluctant to delete academics esp female, her most cited article in google scholar has only 65 citations, and there are no  stories about her that I can see
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WoS shows >250 citations, conclusive evidence that  #1 is satisfied. The article itself is admittedly not in very good shape right now, but it is clear that there is significant  that demonstrates notability. Respectfully
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:RS)

Comment: She has an ok citation count, but not high enough to be convincing to me: on Google scholar, her high citation count is 63, then everything else in 20s. I wasn't sure whether this was maybe just a low-citation field, so I looked at some other people working on plant germination in the Amazon, and found by comparison Christopher Uhl who has numbers nearly ten times larger (and no article here)... I know, , but to me that indicates that the field is not the issue and that the case for #C1 really is unconvincing. She has some leadership role in a couple of societies but again not quite enough for #C6: they're not the highest level posts and it's not clear how major the societies are. And there really doesn't seem to be much to say verifiably about her besides the titles of her publications and those leadership posts. So I'm left wondering, like the nominator, what distinguishes her from any other academic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:PROF)