Deletion of United Domains

Comment: there may be lots of secondary coverage, which I highly doubt,  says that these references must be of high-quality. I cannot find any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES)

Comment: the fact that a speedy deletion prod from the nominator was contested does not invalidate a subsequent AfD nomination. All four "sources" are from the company itself and can not possibly be considered "independent". Cannot find anything even close to "significant coverage" of the subject - looks to fail  fairly clearly. For the record, Hover (domain registrar) is also in fairly bad shape and should probably be considered for deletion also. But  is not a good argument for keeping this article. Nor is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:THISNUMBERISHUGE)