Deletion of Academic views on Falun Gong

Comment: The article currently is poorly written and sounds like an essay. By restricting its sources on the reception of FLG, it presents a limited range of views which certainly violates  and . Furthermore, the article is full of technical jargon and block quoting, which makes it inaccessable to the average reader. Criticism articles shouldn't be catagorized by critic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:WEIGHT)