Deletion of Brooklands photo archive

Comment: No significant coverage in third party sources to meet  or . Very weak coverage in third party sources such as http://www.thetownguide.com/Surrey/Weybridge/Brooklands/Index.asp?p=1 did turn up in a GS, but nothing of any substance. As such, I have to recommend merging the material into the parent article, or in the alternative, deleting it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Although I recognise the poor 3rd part citation and the issue with , we ought to fix that by tagging the problem and editing, not by summary deletion. The history of Brooklands is highly notable, this archive documents that history. There is no issue here with , and even little in respect of , unless you fancy a sophist circular argument about 1st party sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: The self-reference is easily fixed, but I fail to find |reliable sources to establish |notability for this website. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)