Deletion of E & E McLaughlin

Comment: The coverage available in the article and in searches only demonstrates a regular company going about its  business.  No significant coverage in Independent sources, as {{u|HighKing}}'s analysis demonstrates
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: The criteria for notability requires |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content. A lack of sources as indicated above by {{u|Pilot333}} is a reason to Delete. Regarding the sources in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: a quick search gave no secondary in-depth sources, which fails otability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)