Deletion of Rue Protzer

Comment: The quote that you give from  doesn't say "unsourced or poorly sourced material about living persons...should be removed immediately", but "unsourced or poorly sourced ''contentious'' material about living persons...should be removed immediately" (my emphasis). You seem to have ignored the all-important word in your interpretation of policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: According to : "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." The whole of the article is unreferenced; if I remove the material that's not referenced, I'm left with something less than a stub. As such, deleting the whole article is the right thing to do per Wikipedia policy. If the article manages to pass AfD, I'll remove the unreferenced material, and leave it as a stub
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)