Deletion of Millie Midwinter-Lean

Comment: without prejudice for now per . Currently her short career fails  and the lack of wider coverage fails . I will note the BBC article is decent enough... but just the one article does not a notability create. We might consider a return of this article when her career expands and she gets coverage, but otJustYet|not just yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: Does not meet  or . To respond to the above, it indeed '''does not matter''' how many credits, experience or wonderful performances an actor may have under their belt if they haven't "''received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: When evaluating notability of this subject, consideration is made in accordance with |topical notability guidelines for actors. The key points we review include 1. Has had ''significant'' roles in ''multiple notable'' films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; 2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. and 3. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. The subject is '''''presumed''''' notable if s/he meets one of these topical criteria. Presumption and claims of significance, importance, and notability must then be '''''confirmed''''' through |significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Unfortunately, there is nothing presented in the article that indicates that the subject meets either the topical or |general notability guidelines. Best regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:VRS||WP:GNG)