Deletion of Jackie Sandler

Comment: Meets . Article could use expansion, not deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)

Comment: I am no longer sure but I think it; meets  and , she's played roles in quite a few films dating back to the 90s and a search on google books reveals 1. There's books about her and her works and 2. There's books that mention her (some trivially, others not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PERSON)

Comment: Agree with Hmlarson, this article passes , but could be expanded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is an excellent case of "Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED|notability is not inherited". I see some votes above which say she passes GNG. However, if you notice carefully, almost every single article talks about her ''in context of her husband'' and this is essentially . A subject cannot have its own article if the subject is primarily known as the spouse of a notable person. I tried to find out sources to see if the subject is independently notable and I failed. Here are the results of an exclusion search I did on Google news
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INVALIDBIO)