Deletion of Thomas E. Bearden

Comment: He get coverage on blogs etc. And he may even be well-known (?) in certain conspiracy theory circles. But these theories and the people putting them forward tend to be very fleeting. Tomorrow there will be a new theory and a new person putting it forwards.  requires that notability be permanent. Will anyone remember or care about this person in 50 years ? The answer is: most likely not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and redirect to MEG per  (and spirit of  lack of independent notability. Despite talk-page promises that there are sources attesting to notability of this person himself apart from just being someone involved in a notable field or device, none appear to have been provided. He may be lots of things to lots of people and have the potential to...develop or become important in his field according to independent sources, but according to  at this time, does not appear to be. Promising-future-notable people and not-yet-discovered geniuses are out of scope for WP. We really ''are'' a mainstream publication, or at least strictly require reasonably mainstream or at least independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E||WP:RS)