Deletion of Way2SMS

Comment: There are no indications of notability and despite the many Keep !votes above, once again there appears to be a fundamental misunderstanding among some editors on the differences between sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability and the *lower* standard of sources required for citations to support facts or information within an article. In order for references to meet the criteria for establishing notability, they must be intellectually independent - broadly speaking, this rules out references that are largely based on company announcements, hiring and firing news and references that rely extensively on interviews and quotations from company employees or related companies. Based on {{u|SeraphWiki}}'s analysis of the sources above, I would add that http://www.livemint.com/Companies/FVmWXpNXv7Btbpg9BcFEsK/Way2SMS-seeks-to-adapt-to-changing-tech-trends.html this livemint article is extensively based on an interview with the founder and fails , https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/Gurgaon-tech-company-CEO-booked-for-cheating/articleshow/16582030.cms this timesofindia reference is not about the company but about the ex-CEO with the company being a mention-in-passing and fails  and https://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/features/how-to-send-free-sms-581272 the gadgets.ndtv.com reference relates to using a product provided by the company and is not an in-depth article with company details and also fails . The references fails  and/or , the topic therefore fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)