Deletion of Liselle Terret

Comment: As a side note, citations are usually a poor indicator of academic notability in the humanities, and one has to look at other factors. In this case I feel that most of the subject's notability comes from her theatrical work, and thus she should be primarily evaluated on  grounds. There are examples of in-depth detailed coverage of her personally and her theatrical work. E.g. pages 127-129 in this book https://books.google.com/books?id=dmFx1F6jnQMC&pg=PA127&lpg=PA127&dq=%22Doris+La+Trine%22&source=bl&ots=SRVux83hzD&sig=ACfU3U1xsUn4r8mKhKL6iWHtcVgCj5OawQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwibt_L39rzkAhWypFkKHWweDikQ6AEwEnoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Doris%20La%20Trine%22&f=false, p. 3 in this journal article http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:hV2unEJGxNwJ:scholar.google.com/+%22Doris+La+Trine%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,36, an interview with her in this scholarly journal https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13569783.2015.1070663?journalCode=crde20. The latter interview is conducted because the program she lauched, The Performance Making Diploma, won the 2015 The Guardian University Award for Student Diversity and Widening Participation. (I have added the relevant info, with refs to the article.) Overall, I think there is a reasonable case here for passing , taking into account the other sources already in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)