Deletion of Death of Mohammad Habali (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not much has changed from the previous AfD, closed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Death_of_Mohammad_Habali March 2019. We had a few additional more months of silence - lack of continued coverage. On July 22nd AP did run a wire piece - https://www.apnews.com/d8ec787dc4184ba290cf1ff7fe460f12 - on Israeli investigations at large, which used the Habali incident as an example - devoting a few lines to it (and then mentioning it along with all other pending cases - e.g. - {{tq|"All of the remaining Gaza investigations, and several in the West Bank, including the deaths of Habali and Nakhleh, remain ...}}. The AP piece is not  (being but a few lines), and doesn't change the lack of  of this sadly routine event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INDEPTH||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: the title as it fails . (Note: I have contributed to the article) Salting needed as it is evident that the author has strong feelings associated with the topic/subject and is repeatedly creating a non notable death event article. This death was a sad event but it is a conflict zone where hundreds are dying (from both sides). The AfD-1 was closed as delete and the main concern was failing . As we can see the coverage of the event has petered out after the initial spurt as is expected from such cases. Now the right thing to do was to wait and watch if the death gets  over an extended period of time in multiple RSes or not, but the author has jumped the gun on a minor coverage in one source where the subject is Israel Army and Habali is used as an example among others. I agree with Icewhiz in his assessment that this new article is not  coverage. And accordingly the article should be deleted. It seems to me that this article will be created everytime Habali name comes up in newspaper, so I am suggesting a salting as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: Even if its notable and I am not sure about that right now its written as one sided POV piece that should be deleted per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: notable death per  the article has sufficient  many Palestinians are killed in this conflict and some of them are notable. This one is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:RS)