Deletion of List of Boeing customer codes (2nd nomination)

Comment: I am not sure in what way this list article lacks discrimination. If anything it is highly discriminating. It doesn't seem to come under any of the four categories in  and, if these categories are meant as examplars, it doesn't seem to suffer the ills that these categories are supposed to lead us into. If I was to want to take a pot shot I would suggest , in particular "an article on a business should not contain a list of all the company's patent filings". Perhaps that can wait until the next AFD. Now, as it happens, I'm simply  not interested in this topic but I can see why it is helpful encyclopedically. The Malasia Airways aircraft that vanished was a  Boeing 777-2H6ER and I now can tell from the H6 that it was originally sold to this airline. That may be just what I was wanting to know. If this is not included in other encyclopedias, that would seem to strengthen the case here, not weaken it. As for it not being an encyclopedic topic, well, I think it is encyclopedic. I think a case could well be made for removing from the list airlines that do not have articles and codes that do not have references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)