Deletion of James Duke Mason (4th nomination)

Comment: Besides this https://web.archive.org/web/20111117044619/http://www.out.com/out-exclusives/out100/2011/11/03/17th-annual-out100#slide-1 link of 6 years, there is nothing that maintains his notability as for now. Looks like clear case pf 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOSOON)

Comment: significant may be but certainly not notable . Appears to be a case of self aggrandisement. Fails  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per nom.  Fails  for his political work and  for the minor TV appearances, etc.  All prior AfD discussions ended decisively as "delete", except the 3rd one, which appears to have ended in "no consensus" solely due to lack of attention (there were no "keep" arguments given).  I also suspect this article is a violation of  due to the article's extensive deletion/recreation history, the creation of its current incarnation by a , and extensive admitted editing and content-policing by its subject (a clear 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:SPA||WP:COI)

Comment: He fails  by a long shot, and the article relies heavily on name-dropping. He is a visible activist and may well be notable in a few years, but not now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)