Deletion of Calvin Aurand

Comment: Photography is one of those professions that's tough for Wikipedia, because what makes you notable within the world of photography is something that doesn't make you notable on Wikipedia. We want in-depth coverage ''about'' the subject in reliable sources; photographers want their photos used in prominent places. Impressive photo credits don't necessarily translate to  though, and though I see there are a lot of credits in high-profile publications, I'm not seeing significant coverage of the subject himself. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject of the article passes  as defined by Wikipedia: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." The subject of this article has created images, live footage, and documentary films covering various well-known musical artists. Passing  on the basis of the aforementioned, contradicts being deleted due to .--Freyja10   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:CREATIVE||WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Fails . This is one of those cases where someone has done a lot of substantial work behind the scenes creatively but there is absolutely no independent sources to verify that information. The only sources of significance I could find were not independent of the subject. I found his photographs in magazines and newspapers and in One Direction publications, but those media were made as an employee for those organizations and are essentially primary sources (which is fine for verifying he did something but not great for much else). I found absolutely nothing on the creative work he has done in documentary and film besides imdb which is not considered an independent source. There's no critical commentary on his photography or his work as a producer or film maker. In short, its a BLP without any independent supporting references, and keeping it just isn't an option unless we can find some independent sources. BLP sourcing concerns trump 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CREATIVE)