Deletion of Neo4j

Comment: Just look at all these smelly s.  Its wonderful that all the fans of this software program have showed up to show their support, but unfortunately significant coverage from reliable third party publications is virtually non-existent, meaning this fails our general notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)

Comment: I can't find |significant coverage for this software
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Even if "conference play" conferred notability |outside the trade, it seems clear that the presentation was made by company staff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: Although there are quite a few blog-level reports on this software, as well as some industry conference presentations, and even some academic papers mention using it, overall I have trouble finding in-depth coverage in  sources to satisfy . I suspect this article will be recreated at some point after better-known secondary sources write about neo4j. The developers that edit here shouldn't take it hard. After all, the 1st google hit is their own site, on which they can make a better presentation of the product that it's currently possible here given the |rules. (FYI: the Wikipedia article on neo4j is not even in the top 10 ghits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG||WP:RS)