Deletion of Brownmark Films

Comment: From orp - ...attention solely by local media is not an indication of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: and merge into parent company Special Entertainment. As stated above, article is not , and just doesn't appear to me to establish notability for a seperate article. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: edit conflict) |Notability is not inherited. I contend that ''What What (In the Butt)'' is notable and can possibly be reliably sourced as such. However, the company is not |reliably sourced, nor could I find any in a cursory Google search. Hence, a lack of |notability with the ''company'', not the ''video
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:RS||WP:CORP)

Comment: or '''Merge'''.  I can't really see this passing .  Company with one popular-on-youtube video and a small handful of other related but less-successful youtube videos
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Article has been further sourced and meets the requiremnents of . Further, if the productions are notable, the producing company has that same notability '''if they have coverage in reliable sources''', as does Brownmark. If there had been no articles about the production company, I'd be saying delete or merge, but since that is not the case, its now a keeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)