Deletion of Nadine Baggott

Comment: I do not believe that NB meets any of the general notability criteria for people listed at  with the possible exception of wide name recognition through stating her name during her appearance in TV adverts.If I tell enough people my name enough times am I famous?I also feel that NB does not meet any of the specific criteria for either television personalities or journalists. She has won a single award in what seems to be a very narrow field - namely "journalism about perfume". Moreover, the award appears to have been for the title of an article, rather than the article itself. I don't feel this single award is significant recognition of her work by her peers.If I think up a snazzy advertising slogan, is that notable?In summary, despite the rejection of my request for speedy deletion on the basis that she is "a notable person", I still contend that she is not in fact notable. The most notable thing about her is probably the amount of money expended by Olay to various TV companies in pushing her onto UK TV screens
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I originated the article, and I'd like to say now '''I'm NOT Nadine Baggott''' - I can't speak about some of the Anon's though who have "added" comments. I originally added an article because much as though I don't think she's the most wonderful or entertaining person in the world, a bit of investigation to me showed that she did pass  on at least two counts: ''The person has demonstrable wide name recognition; Commercial endorsements of demonstrably notable products.'' I also don't particularly like editors http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadine_Baggott&diff=156605982&oldid=156289399|"grooming" articles for deletion - before making your mind up on this one, have a look at the edit history. I will also add one more point - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nadine_Baggott&oldid=105910518|my original version of the article has more references and seems closer to a better/more encyclopedic article: perhaps one of those unique articles which has deteriorated through co-operation; or just a refelction on her public view? Rgds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)