Deletion of Yeshiva World News

Comment: because in the age of the Internet, whereby people obtain news and track local and international current events from the web, this has become THE premier site for American English speaking Haredi Jews to gain their news as well as to post and read many announcements of direct interest to that community. While independently run it generally reflects the views of the Agudath Israel of America in a broad sense which itself has no websites and indirectly relies on YWN to get its "news" out. The article needs improvement but it most definitely is  with many  easily available. It certainly qualifies to be in :Category:Blogs about Jews and Judaism or :Category:Jewish websites all part of :Category:Jewish media. Note, this is also clearly a case of Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:R)

Comment: Some review at Google suggests that it's a serious and fairly well-known news source for the Orthodox/Hasidic community. A Google News search, as well as the website's own http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/media.php "In the News" section, turns up at least several dozen examples of mainstream reliable news sources relying on and/or referencing news reports originating in ''Yeshiva World News''.  The multiple mentions in mainstream |reliable sources would satisfy the |notability issue for me.However, I agree that in its current state the article is almost entirely fluff, beyond its initial identifying sentence. I'd note that the same problem seems to exist for the article about YWN's competitor, ''Vosizneias'', which was duly stripped to a single sentence in March.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vosizneias&diff=278490232&oldid=272345684  However, a Google search of the string  turns up more than 3,500 hits that mention both sites.  Most of this is just blogger stuff but news reports do pop up here and there discussing and/or comparing the sites. One of the oldest (when this was still a blogspot blog) is this from the May 22, 2006 ''Times Herald-Record
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)