Deletion of Quarterly Review of Film and Video

Comment: My thanks to {{u|Unscintillating}} for offering a decent |alternative that |serves the project and its readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: In my research, I found http://www.dailynebraskan.com/arts_and_entertainment/unl-film-professors-selected-to-edit-cinematic-book-series/article_f2960810-a77f-5893-9483-285d3b5b756f.html this about the series, but it is by a school newspaper. Dixon has messaged me on my talk page, and I've asked him about coverage similar to that link to meet . Redirecting is the temporary stance I have in mind right now, but I am hoping for further developments since it does not seem impossible for this journal to have a Wikipedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: nbsp; WP:Notability is not a content policy, it is a guideline as to whether a ''topic'' has received enough attention from the world at large to merit a standalone article rather than a lesser role within a larger topic, and requires no sourcing in an article.&nbsp; Nor is WP:N a deletion policy, although a special case exists within eletion policy for when there is no suitable larger topic.&nbsp; #Notability is content policy, and this ''article'' currently has no source to satisfy this requirement.&nbsp; This article significantly lacks in inline citations, so fails  in two different ways.&nbsp; The topic, however, has attracted the attention of the world at large over a period of time, and this includes Wikipedia editors, for whom encyclopedic coverage with reliable information on a WP:RS is of importance.&nbsp; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=100&offset=0&profile=default&search=%22quarterly+review+of+film+and+video%22 This Wikipedia search shows thirty articles with the string "Quarterly Journal of Film and Video".&nbsp; The related specification in WP:BEFORE mentions the "What Links Here", which has a shorter list whose mention would have been appropriate in the nomination.&nbsp; The WP:BEFORE book's test finds hundreds of ghits, the mention of which would have been appropriate in the nomination.&nbsp; I specifically found that the first 300 ghits have the words "Quarterly Journal of Film and Video" in bold in the snippets, so merit further attention.&nbsp; But also, it is not necessary that a topic that passes WP:N be retained as a standalone topic.&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:V)