Deletion of Godfrey Poku

Comment: Compelling argument subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  and  due to a lack of significant media coverage. News items are |routine coverage and fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: Fails  by never having played in a fully-professional league or at senior international level, and no evidence of enough non-trivial media coverage to show |general notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BIO)

Comment: In a response to an above comment. Articles should always be clearly assessed before nomination to make sure they don't meet  not just because they don't meet . If  is failed they can still have their own article if they meet GNG. However i agree with the nominator the sources are mostly routine i.e match reports and comments and are not enough to meet . Im open to changing my mind if better sources can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: largely per Sionk. I fully agree, the subject does not meet . With that said, the subject has received |significant coverage in |reliable third party sources and meets the |general notability guidelines and the |notability guidelines for biographies. He is the primary topic of many of the sources already used in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:IRS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)