Deletion of Chris Skelley

Comment: I'm not sure if as the article creator I am allowed to vote for this article, but here it is. I believe that he does pass . Unfortunately there is no section for judo under  which is a bit disappointing, and although he presently fails  in six months time he may do so, and imho I feel similar to Basement12 that the discrepancy between the recognition of Olympic and Paralympic athletes is a disgrace to Wikipedia, but as Mdtemp states that is a fight for another day. I created the article as I honestly thought that medalling at a European level is notable enough for an athlete. There are only two competitions above this level that this athlete can compete at, they are the Worlds and the Paralympics. He can't gain notability through other means as his sport is not professional, which is often the instrument used to deem if notability is met for sportspeople
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT||WP:NOLYMPICS)

Comment: as I agree with above comments that section 4 of  is clearly passed and notability established, the guidelines on olympic notability should be changed as a matter of priority as it is discrimination against the paralympics that their notability rules are stricter, and a bad stain on the reputation of wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MANOTE)

Comment: Competing at the Paralympics should meet , the original intent of creating that guideline was that it wouldn't have different rules for Olympians and Paralympians (somewhere along the line that got lost and it now only allows for Paralympic medallists but that's a whole other argument). Admittedly he won't actually compete at the Paralympics for a few more months but for a decently written, well sourced article (his selection and results appear in multiple BBC, BT Sport, IPC, BPA, etc. articles) I see no reason to delete now for the sake of recreating down the road
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLYMPICS)