Deletion of City Seminary

Comment: to City Seminary of San Francisco. The ''Sacramento Bee'' article cited by Cullen328 above definitely counts towards significant coverage under . I also agree that articles on legitimate degree-granting institutions should generally be kept. I was leaning towards deletion per Sarek, given the fact that the State of California apparently does not have a listing for this seminary. But then I read Waynenoogen's comment, which is immediately above mine; Wayne appears to be affiliated with the seminary, and he claims that "City Seminary was granted permission to award theological degrees in 2005, but as of January of this year, the state has discontinued the listing process (which had been transferred to the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education)." So I went to the BPPE's website, but https://app.dca.ca.gov/bppe/view-voc-names.asp?program_keyword=&city=Sacramento&Submit=Search they don't have a listing for this seminary either. In other words, |verifiability of this school's status as a legitimate degree-granting institution is a problem here. And yet, in spite of that problem, there are some sources here, the article in question is neutral and descriptive, and the subject is a school. As a result, being on the fence, I would prefer to err on the side of "keep" in this debate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: There not even a single source that demonstrates notablity. This fails : " If some source material is available, but is insufficient for a comprehensive article, it is better to mention the subject under the article for its parent locality. '''If no source material, or only directory-type information (location, function, name, address) can be provided, the subject may not merit mention at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL)

Comment: nbsp; An examination of http://www.cityseminary.org shows that in the copyright notice in smaller print at the bottom of the page there is an organization called "City Seminary of Sacramento".&nbsp; But this name does not appear in the large print banner at the top of the page.&nbsp; Thus IMO the home page of the official web site here fails  (misleads the readers with factually inaccurate information).&nbsp; In terms of notability policy, identifiability is a requirement for notability and we currently cannot with WP:RS identify the name.&nbsp; As others here have said, there is a presumption of notability for such schools, so this is a !vote without prejudice to recreating, probably under another name and leaving this name for a dab page.&nbsp; Another web site mentions that the school operates under the "auspices" of a local congregation, and the school mentions their objection to being accredited, so there may continue to be difficulty even with research in Sacramento in establishing a WP:RS identity.&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:EL)