Deletion of Surfing (Counter-Strike) (third nomination)

Comment: because , but I think Reinoutr is making a perfectly valid point here.  Speedy delete should be used sparingly, and not in the case of articles with substantially different content.  This is still bad, but it's a *different* bad article with little hope of salvage, and must go through the process again.  Of course, if it's a copyvio, then that would warrant speedy delete, but otherwise he's right.  In some cases AFD is used because a full rewrite from scratch is preferable to a current mangled article.  That should be respected, and articles rewritten in good faith should go through the AFD process again, in full
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:NOT a game guide. Possibly  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COPYVIO)