Deletion of Inoki Bom-Ba-Ye 2001

Comment: Articles clearly pass  and  due to non-routine and exceptional nature of these events (annual events are not routine like weekly seasonal events), which are not really comparable to any random baseball game, for example.  The participation of mainstream fighters and the fact that they are covered in association with these event in not just English, but also foreign language sources further demonstrates that these article meet .  Finally, "it's useful" is actually a very good reason for keeping these or any articles, as after all, one of the main points for an encyclopedia to exist in the first place is because it is a useful reference tool.  Objectively speaking, there is no reason to delete these articles.  Just not liking something that is relevant to other readers is not a reason to delete anything.  There is no benefit to anyone by getting rid of these, whereas by keeping them, at least those interested in the subject can have a handy reference to this aspect of mixed-martial arts history.  Even in a worst case scenario, these would be redirected, but there is no one we need to protect from this information that would justify deleting it altogether
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Both articles fail .  Internet searches provide only the usual fight cards and results.  There is very little coverage of either event therefore they both fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG)

Comment: Articles fail  and .  There's no indication of notability, only routine sports coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: The only source for either article is a list of the results.  The articles lack significant coverage and fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)