Deletion of Tease and denial

Comment: or '''redirect''' to Erotic sexual denial. DGG has found sources about the topic, however they are not cited in the article, which is unsourced and so we don't know whether the content matches the sources. Consequently, the content should be suppressed until it is made verifiable to readers by inline citations. As this is contested content by virtue of this AfD, it must be sourced or removed per . Also, the two articles are about the same topic as far as I can tell. We need only one. Ideally, one is redirected to another, which is then reduced to a sourced stub to remove all the unsourced content, and it can grow back from there to the extent editors cite sources for any additions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: ESD covers the subject, and the references provided by DGG can be applied to improve that article. Also, a redirect or improvement to Tease will get readers to the right place. What this article (along with other similar articles) might become is a , and a single article such as ESD allows editors to follow one page, not multiple. Finally, we have  considerations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:OSE)