Deletion of The SARS Network

Comment: Appears to be an |essay with substantial copy-and-pasting from its sources. The sentences mentioned in the nomination were lifted from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/papers/mpnsb.pdf here; "One of the striking features..." was lifted from https://web.archive.org/web/20140517115237/http://www.cwu.edu/~bowenjo/SARS.pdf here. So was the rest of the paragraph after "patients are infectious only after they exhibit symptoms". Overall, the article starts with vague generalities about network theory and segues into plagiarism. Nor is the choice of title very good. The term "SARS network" might better refer to the network of ''people'' who worked to identify its source (see, e.g., https://science.sciencemag.org/content/300/5617/224.summary this ''Science'' story from 2003). But even that sense is rare
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)