Deletion of Kiernan Majerus-Collins

Comment: Fails  and . Pointless article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails  and . Pretty cut and dry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: probably should have been speedied - looks like classic A7 to me. Otherwise it fails  and the . The "references" only prove he is indeed on the Democratic Town Committee but do nothing toward establishing his having done anything WP notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: No notability per , and no substantive |reliable source coverage. And as the person who ''wrote'' the "how a local politician might occasionally still get over the bar" clarification that the creator is citing above, let me assure them of this: that criterion is ''not'' meant to cover off local political figures whose coverage is limited to their ''local'' newspaper — if he were getting coverage in ''The New York Times'' or ''The Washington Post'' or ''The Los Angeles Times'' or ''The Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', ''then'' that criterion would come into play. Attaching a claim of national significance to a ''hometown'' paper which is covering him in a ''local'' context is not how you satisfy that criterion — the ''places'' where the coverage is ''coming'' from have to nationalize to get a person into Wikipedia on that basis. If the coverage is coming exclusively from local media, however, then making ''claims'' that the local media outlet in question ''has'' national prominence is not enough — for example, ''The New York Times'' has ''far'' more national prominence than the ''Hartford Courant'' does, but even ''it'' still can't ''singlehandedly'' carry the notability of a ''local'' political activist in New York City. If that person doesn't pass  on the basis of their ''position'', and hasn't expanded outward to also garner coverage in Washington or Seattle or Chicago or San Francisco, then the mere fact that the ''local'' coverage happens to be in ''The New York Times'' rather than the ''Podunk Pennysaver'' does not augment their notability in and of itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:NPOL)