Deletion of StuMagz

Comment: On assessment (above) of the sources provided, the article looks to pass . The company clearly has a good marketing department or agency, but on balance it looks to me like there's enough coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: It is informative to look at the website of the parent company https://www.rightprocess.in Right Process InfoTech Pvt. Ltd which says that it is an SEO, search engine marketing, content management and online reputation management company. I believe there is undisclosed paid editing and  going on here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: The assessment of references here is not right. You seem to find excuses to discard every notable, reliable and independent newspaper in India. One user cited Hindustan Times and Times of India in their reason for deleting this article. While I know HT and TOI are notable sources in Indian journalism but that does not outcast all other newspapers in India. For me, this article has more than enough Reliable Independent sources to warrant a place on Wikipedia. Try replacing the question marks '?' in the assessment with  and things will be clear. None of us actually 100 percent know if something is independent or not. This article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)