Deletion of Jeremy Sapienza

Comment: per nomination.  Although some users are suggesting that the subject is notable, what is not up for debate is that the entire article is written by his friends, and is considered |original research; there is not a shred of |verifiable information either in the article, or that we can find on him.  Wiki-rules indicate that we should delete this article.  Furthermore, I put this article up for deletion at the request of the subject; although "No consensus" usually indicates that the article should be kept, in situations where the subject does not wish his or her article to remain, I would hope that we could either delete the article, or perhaps merge it to the anti-war.com article, which is where he is perhaps most notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V)

Comment: WP:GHITS|Google hits do not establish notability. What we need, by , is secondary coverage in reliable sources. No secondary sources are given in the article, and within the Google hits (200 distinct, by the way) I found none either. If you know of any substantial press coverage, biographies published, or similar, please add these to the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)