Deletion of George Right Smith

Comment: as , this is an interesting article about the war written from the point of view of the South, but scrolling down, Smith is hardly mentioned, it doesnt even say how/why he was promoted to 2nd/1st Lieutenant, reflecting the lack of significant/indepth sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: Concur with above. Article is sourced mainly to PRIMARY sources (e.g. service record), and then ed with a description of the war. This is followed by an obit in what appears to be a local paper (unsure). Essentially - we have a civil war history told through the eyes of Smith's campaign record
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)