Deletion of Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne

Comment: per -REASON 6: {{tq|Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources, including wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|neologisms, wikipedia:No original research|original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes|hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)}}. It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to the Austro-Hungarian throne to  sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the monarchy itself was abolished more than a century ago. This article is as ridiculous an exercise in speculation as trying to determine the current chain of command of the East German National People's Army
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:RELIABLE)

Comment: What's weird about the article is that it assumes the monarchy never stopped, which is absolutely ridiculous. I think an article that cuts off right at the end of the monarchy could be kept, but I don't know if that article exists, and in no way, shape, or form should anyone afterwards be included, as it's basically make believe. Whether that means I'm a keep on notability grounds or a delete on  grounds, I'm not sure
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)