Deletion of Kung Fu Records

Comment: The nominator claims that, because there are ''three'' possible redirect targets (The Vandals and the two members of the Vandals who founded the label), no single redirect makes sense, and so the only reasonable action is for us to turn this into a redlink. This makes no sense - it actively makes the site ''less'' informative, ''less'' interlinked, ''less'' user-friendly for enthusiasts in the area of interest. The commenters above are, implicitly, gesturing toward , which, again, makes much more sense as a yardstick than  for labels (again, a band is unquestionably a for-profit corporation, but I'll eat my hat if we start applying CORP to bands). This is a label big enough to make https://books.google.com/books?id=H8S0WdfdaJQC&pg=PA4 CMJ for its legal activities (for Pete's sake!), and it was a feeder label for some quite noteworthy pop-punk bands of the Nineties. It's plainly encyclopedic, and if the misapplication of CORP and ORGIND and INHERIT are keeping us from seeing that, we should |ignore them. If there is some other action (such as a merge) that anyone wants to pursue, feel free - but this is the wrong venue for that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:CORP||WP:IAR)

Comment: I think this is one of the more important (punk) indie labels, with a sizeable roster. The search results seem to be skewed somewhat due to the label being setup by band members of The Vandals. Speaking of which, as an , in the worst case sceanrio, then redirect to the band
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)