Deletion of Andrew Bloch (2nd nomination)

Comment: Article has many problems. I had to remove a lot of pointless information about his student jobs and his work experience. Also the subject does not seem to meet our |notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I certainly see references claiming this award or that for the subject's ''agency.''  I don't see evidence of notability for Bloch himself; he neither meets any of the criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO.  Suggestions that we could only apply Wikipedia's policies and guidelines out of malice towards the subject's profession is |a display of bad faith, and I further recommend that Mr. Sorrels place his focus on coming up with the mainstream media sources which would secure a pass under the GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: Your point about  is noted (though we can discuss the notability of the PR company itself when it is appropriate).  Thank you.  However, there is still independent, specific coverage of Bloch http://cde.cerosmedia.com/1A4dd124484cca1199.cde here and http://brightone.org.uk/about/people/andrew-bloch/ here and http://www.gorkanapr.com/news/article?news_articles_id=5595 here that I stand by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSA)