Deletion of Diana Soto

Comment: Note, I am coming here via a discussion raised by JzG at NSPORT) JzG is challenging the presumption of notability given by NOLY as only one source exists in the article. The "Keep" !votes stating she's notable because of NOLY are not contributing as NOLY still requires editors to find independent secondary sources to build out the article. Whether JzG had done the necessary legwork per  is unclear, but there are factors working both with and against this: we have a 2000 Olympian so there should be a good chance there will be online sources but that she is from Peru and that might making finding even online sources more difficult. But !voters cannot restart "NOLY" here; that's exactly the type of  in AFDs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ATA)

Comment: A quick search in Spanish shows a lot of coverage, with results in at least three different languages, though it tends to be either about matches she's played in or on the Olympic team as a whole, including http://caracol.com.co/radio/2000/08/16/deportes/0966405600_058448.html. I think it's enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)

Comment: Meets  with the new sources presented by Lugnuts. My advice to the author is to write articles with sources that clearly demonstrate the subject meets  from the start. Even if someone meets the SSG and it's a stub I think the article should at least contain a source or two proving notability so we can avoid these discussions. Sports-reference isn't a sufficient source to demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)