Deletion of Companions of the Hall

Comment: as this article is comprised of #PLOT|plot summmary, which cannot be |verified as the primary source(s) are not cited with footnotes, and it is written from a heavy #The problem with in-universe perspective|in universe perspective which is devoid of real-world context or critical analysis relating to the development of this fictional group. Also, there are no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate that this fictional character has any real-world |notability. The subject matter is dealt with extensively on fansites as ghits show, so there is no good reason to keep this article; there is no evidence that this plot summary has any encyclopedic value at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:WAF||WP:RS||WP:FICT)

Comment: This is entirely #PLOT|plot summary and I doubt any of the characters have been covered in reliable secondary sources per . If you trimmed out the content that fails policy, you'd be left with virtually nothing to merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT)

Comment: An effort is being made to use this article as a spinoff article from The Icewind Dale Trilogy to describe the main characters instead of having individual articles for them, as was previously the case.  As this is (clearly, I think) a notable series of books, having this article as a summary of information about the characters seems like an appropriate level of detail in line with .  The contested prod was actually placed ''after'' the proposal to merge the character information here was made at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wulfgar (Forgotten Realms)|AfD for one of the characters, without any mention of the prod being made in the AfD discussion, which was a bit disconcerting to discover when the AfD ended, but I'm assuming this was an oversight by Mikeblas and not an intentional attempt to force an outcome on the AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)