Deletion of YTCracker (2nd nomination)

Comment: but tag for cleanup. Subject has a plethora of multiple, independent sources cited asserting media coverage and notability. Article is neither  nor . Fails nomination to delete. Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN||WP:NN)

Comment: Before the unsigned votes, there were three "legitimate" keep votes based on true assertions about the artist's notability and compatability with  versus zero delete votes. It is too soon to renominate an article based solely on the fact that it is in poor form -- that is a cause to edit, not delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Never heard of him myself, but he appears to have enough coverage to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: YT has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works.  Even if we discount the ones that feature his cracking, there are still a few about his music.  It's a close call, but I think he meets the #Musicians_and_ensembles|musician notability standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: per above comments, this figure has coverage enough to meet  guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)