Deletion of 2012 in UFC events (2nd nomination)

Comment: edit conflict with Ravenswing's sensible comment'') The content is encyclopedic and mostly referenced. There has been a lot of dispute here as to whether individual UFC events deserve articles, but this combined article is a good compromise. The reason for deletion doesn't make sense per Wikipedia policy. Summary articles are allowed even if the events have their own pages. Finally, it was AfDed previously less than a month ago, with the result "speedy keep", so nominating it again so quickly is an abuse of Wikipedia's process, possibly a case of  or , almost certainly more to do with the debate over coverage of UFC than any concern about notability or article quality
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:REICHSTAG)

Comment: It's mildly amusing that the MMA meatpuppets fight so hard to keep individual event articles, but are now rallying to shoot down the portmanteau articles more in accordance with Wikipedia policies and practices; that they are so upset about the alleged agendas of veteran editors, but unabashedly admit they come to Wikipedia with agendas of their own.  As far as this AfD goes, of course, the nom has not advanced a valid reason for deletion under eletion policy, and the two Delete proponents above haven't even managed that much, confining their arguments to the perfidy of their opponents and the notability of individual MMA events.  As such, I am comfortable with terming this a '''bad faith nomination,''' as one intending to attack a position and individual editors rather than through any genuine belief in the non-notability of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)

Comment: and close AfD as per USER:Ravenswing|Ravenswing. Bad faith nomination from a . Nominator does not cite any policies to support deletion;  is an essay, not a policy. Article clearly passes  and is |well-sourced. As USER:Colapeninsula|Colapeninsula suggests, the summary article can exist even if the individual events have their own pages. This is not the venue to debate Wikipedia's coverage of MMA, nor is this AfD the venue to discuss whether or not each and every event is |notable enough to merit their own respective articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GNG)