Deletion of Conectiva

Comment: The 'research' mentioned above does not discuss how significant the coverage of the company is in detail, but gives the impression it simply confirms the company was mentioned in passing for its business as usual/press release type activity. Nothing presented so far suggests it would pass . PS. I did, in fact, look at the first book source, https://books.google.co.kr/books?id=5CsFGUtF2eYC&lpg=PP1&dq=Linux%20Patch%20Management%3A%20Keeping%20Linux%20Systems%20Up%20to%20Date&pg=PA151#v=onepage&q=Conectiva&f=false, which mentions the company several times, but in passing. The book does not discuss the company, just talks a bit about the product (code) it produced. If this represents the best sources we have, this is very much a failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: It is unclear if {{u|Uncle G}} has explicitly !voted to Keep in this AfD, but his research has revealed two references that meet the criteria for establishing notability as per . Both the "Linux Patch Management" book and the lwn.net article provide in-depth information on the company. Topic therefore meets GNG and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NCORP)