Deletion of Khan Noonien Singh

Comment: You yourself admitted that there is real-world notability for this character. Whether it is currently asserted in the article is really irrelevant to the deletion discussion if even the nominator agrees that it exists. Incorporating it into the article is a |surmountable task. Though I should also remind you that |there is no deadline. This is all the more reason why things that a nominator recognizes can be fixed (even if it is something as high up on the list as assertion of notability) are not a reason for deletion. Violations of  or a need for sourcing (when sources are shown to exist) are other examples of surmountable problems which should be taken care of as expediently as possible, but to which  still applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM||WP:DEADLINE||WP:PLOT||WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: per Hnsampat and improvements to the article. Khan is too prominent a villain. Is is time for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)