Deletion of Alphense Boys

Comment: There's nowhere this could be merged as a middle ground solution? There doesn't seem likely to be enough  content on this topic, based on coverage in eliable sources to be much justification for retention of this article.  It's also worth noting, since it's been referenced, that  is an ssay, not a  or olicy, meaning it has no more weight as policy direction than we would put on any one contributor's !vote in a discussion. And I doubt that national cup provision would survive community scrutiny, honestly, if you crunch the numbers and think about just how many non-notable clubs, completely uncovered by reliable sources, would then qualify for articles. However, aggregating such clubs into a handful of parent articles might be a solution you could get a fair number of editors around, though it would require some post-AfD legwork and coordination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE||WP:R||WP:FOOTYN||WP:E||WP:P||WP:guideline)

Comment: meets |FOOTYN, |GNG, and |ORG. This football club should never have been listed for deletion and discussion should be closed as nowball|snowball and speedy keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN||WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:S)

Comment: Passes |FOOTYN, has played in a national competition, namely 2011–12 KNVB Cup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)