Deletion of Yasmin Scott

Comment: does not pass  or . IMDb is not a reliable source because it is usergenerated and tabloid sources such as the Daily Star are also not considered reliable especially for biographies of living people, note the telegraph is the Australian tabloid not the UK broadsheet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: as non notable porn actress, no evidence of notability, fails  & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: No obvious BLP-compliant sources out there - a news search throws up a bunch of ''Daily Mail'' gossip pieces and a load of other trash. I think Rashkeqamar has managed to produce a list of the worst possible -violating tabloids in the UK
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPSOURCES)

Comment: not notable; , if the subject ever will. Appearing in multiple productions is nothing special, and is not a basis for notability. Also, there seems to be a lot of SPA votes here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as failing .  Being in a lot of productions isn't one of the listed criteria and |notability is not inherited by association
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:NOTINHERITED)