Deletion of Lola Yuldasheva

Comment: AJ has it backwards. We don't default to keep, particularly on BLP articles because we can't find sources to disprove. Nor do we give a pass because it's hard to find sources. If there's an iceberg of sources then at least demonstrate there's something from what's available.I also like the creator's comment: "It seems to be true that Wikipedia is a collection of articles by conservative twenty-somethings who are trying to rewrite history." It's followed by "immediately remove this article from the list of articles to be deleted." That just advertises you're unfamiliar with our policies and how AfD works. Just read the top of the  page and it explains that in most cases the page will be listed here for 7 days.I have no opinion on whether the article should be kept or not. It needs sources however there are a few
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: I do not speak or read Uzbek, nor does Google offer a translation facility, so this is an occasion on which I have to assume good faith.  needs to be interpreted contextually, and there is enough evidence from a Google search that she is a sufficently popular singer in Uzbekistan to pass the notabiity threshold. In addition, she clearly did have a leading part in a popular film which is another claim to notability. As Nataev points out, an equivalent artist in the US would undoubtedly pass. It can always be brought back if the claims are later shown to be false. Doubtless there are Uzbek magazines and newspapers that could be used as sources, but the truth is that it would be impossible for us to check them anyway, so good faith must be assumed in the absence of any evidence to the contrary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)