Deletion of Religious symbolism of unity of opposites

Comment: There is no evidence that the article under discussion is not .  It does seem likely that out there somewhere in the scholarly literature are accounts addressing the presumptive topic of the article as a whole.  But unless and until the article is written based on such sources, I think the article should be deleted as OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: nbsp;As an "IP", I'm not sure if I can "vote"; however, I'd like to comment that this is ''potentially'' a valid WP topic.  As it currently stands it is woefully lacking in -es.  A bit of research can validate many if not all of these items.  For example, I just referenced Kangiten with a good source (based on my research for a Cultural depictions of elephants |related article).  I suggest that for now it be converted to an annotated list.  In addition, please note that the Wikipedia: Deletion policy does *not* include a currently poorly sourced article as a reason for deletion; instead: &nbsp;"''Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed''" or "''cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources.''"  &nbsp;I assert that a  thorough (or even cursory) attempt would negate deletion.  &nbsp;—Eric, IP=Special:Contributions/71.20.250.51|71.20.250.51
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)