Deletion of Canine Companions for Independence (2nd nomination)

Comment: per |significant coverages in multiple independent |reliable sources. I understand that the extent of promotional wording is too obvious to ignore but we can stubify it. I found https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Jt69JwAACAAJ&dq=Canine+Companions+for+Independence&hl=en&sa=X&ei=W_OMVfDVDYu9UfGDiIgM&ved=0CCEQ6AEwBA this book, http://markets.on.nytimes.com/research/stocks/news/press_release.asp?docTag=201504160800PR_NEWS_USPRX____NY81916&feedID=600&press_symbol=149722 New York Times, http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/09/us/cnnheroes-ptsd-service-dogs/ CNN, http://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/puppies-bred-to-help-the-disabled/ CBS News, https://books.google.com/books/about/Heritability_of_Behavior_in_Dogs_with_Re.html?id=_ofnGwAACAAJ this book, http://insider.foxnews.com/tag/canine-companions-independence Fox News Insider, http://abcnews.go.com/Health/pet-owners-game-emotional-support-animal-system-fly/story?id=30064532 ABC News, http://nation.time.com/2014/02/14/petsmart-for-patriots-wounded-vets-dogs/ Nation Time and http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/21/service-dogs-companions-inaugural-parade/1853857/ US Today to mention few. In addition the article is of great historical and encyclopedic importance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)