Deletion of Luis Elizondo

Comment: several people are proposing to merge this with To the Stars (company). This is a significant point against  as Elizondo is mainly notable for his association with Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program of which he was the director and original disclosure source. To the Stars is just the company he is consulting for at the moment. Should it be merged with both? And how would that merge practically work? If we should merge this anywhere it would be within AATIP where it would be more relevant and where coverage would make more sense
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: With To the Stars (company)|To the Stars. ''If'' Elizondo has any encyclopedic notability (and along those lines I refer readers to the 2019 article about him in ''The Intercept'', which - for some reason - has escaped mention on the Elizondo page), it seems to be through his association and activities with To the Stars (company)|To the Stars. I understand the legitimacy of the  and  concerns noted above by
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Per . Lots of military people ran government programs both secret and public. Has he made it into any biographical dictionaries or history books or won any well-known honors or awards for his government UFO work per  (see Note 8)? As an example, look at the more impressive article for psychic-supporting Major General Albert Stubblebine, a name many here will immediately recognize. I support UFO research, just want to make that clear. My vote should not be considered anti-UFO and I would support an article on Elizondo in the future if he passes the test of time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: to To the Stars (company) on the basis of  as evidenced by a notable absence of coverage outside of mentions in news media regarding a recent UFO flap. A  is expected to be more than a  containing quotes from the subject claiming mysterious government opposition to UFO research and warning of potential aerial threats. The lack of independent analysis or critique for these claims, as well as zero common biographical detail such as education, background, etc. demonstrates that a standalone bio is  for this particular subject
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP||WP:COATRACK||WP:TOOSOON)