Deletion of Dollshot

Comment: The coverage in Soundcheck_(radio_program)|Soundcheck is a step toward  notability, but that's the only RS that gives any kind of depth-of-coverage that I can see.  Close, but not quite
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I can't find sources that would bring them over the  guideline. It's all a bunch of blurbs or primary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: current and additional Googled sourcing fails .  The new album isn't even mentioned on Amazon, whereas almost every album I've ever looked up is there, at least as a stub. Dollshot's first album is there, with only one review, FWIW. Noah K's German article is almost completely unsourced, and the German Wikipedia's standards are notably lower than ours. Also, notability is not inherited - so a founder from a notable band can't go to a new band and automatically claim notability. The NewMusicUSA source is more about Wyschnegradsky. Finally, I know there's a guideline that says , which means you can't use other articles' existence to defend unrelated articles, but from a sourcing perspective, I like to see many or at least the majority of sources on Wikipedia themselves.  Few of these sources are. The New York City Jazz Record has a stub article, so with one source it may not even survive AfD. The Big Takeover has an article, but it's also poorly sourced, as is Esopus (magazine). There needs to be more mainstream coverage for this to be a keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF)