Deletion of Umar Ansari

Comment: To be fair, until January of this year the article implied in its phrasing that he was an actual ''MLA'', which would be why it flew under the radar — it didn't literally say that outright, but it implied it in the way his relationship to the constituency of Mau was phrased. But indeed, there's no evidence whatsoever that he ever has been an MLA, and all the sources actually say is that he was a ''campaign manager'' for his ''father'' (the actual MLA). But notability is |not inherited, so he isn't entitled to have an article just because his father has one, and being campaign manager is not a notability-clinching claim of significance. This is exactly why I always say that even with the "inherent" notability granted to MLAs, we still require at least one reliable source to properly ''verify'' that they actually hold the claimed office
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)