Deletion of "The Board" in Hollywood FL

Comment: I found a paper copy of the 1962 edition of ''Social Thought From Lore To Science'' in my local university library and in the page range named in the cite I've not found any mention of this group.  Also as a general thought, I would imagine that a group with an application failure rate of 99% would attract some local comment in its own community.  I find it strange therefore that there are no mentions in local press let alone academic journals.  Despite my best efforts and trying to |assume good faith I can't help wondering if this article and hence this discussion is part of a sociological experiment
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: WP:INTERESTING|Interesting and |valuable?   also comes to mind
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VALINFO||WP:NPROF)

Comment: as |unverifiable. I admit that I have not seen the offline sources, but the overall vagueness of the article leads me to suspect that the offline sources do not mention ''this'' group, but at best refer to the psychological benefits of small groups in general, or something like that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)