Deletion of New York Derby (MLS)

Comment: This fails the GNG. Not due to lack of coverage in appropriate sources, which normally is the concern, but rather due to a lack of showing that the coverage is an indication of genuine sustained notability.  is part of WP:N, and it captures this situation perfectly: "The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere short-term interest, nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the topic unsuitable for any other reason." I would argue that both the short-term interest clause and promotional activity clauses are at issue here. This can of course be cured with time, and sourcing with captures the interest over time. However, that time is not yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRV)

Comment: you simply can't have a rivalry when they have only played '''twice''' about five minutes ago and when one of the teams competing is in their '''debut''' season! Yes there has been coverage of the '''two''' matches which has discussed notions of rivalry, but this is not significant coverage per  by definition as it concerns only '''two''' meetings between the two clubs. This may well be a notable subject in a few years, especially if similar articles are generated each time the two sides meet, but just not at the moment. I have bolded words in my argument that you simply should not be seeing in any discussion of a rivalry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRIVALRY)