Deletion of Scandals of the 2004 Summer Olympics (2nd nomination)

Comment: The first point of the Afd regarding no references is wrong. They are all at the bottom of the article. What is needed is in text references, but that is something to clean up, not delete over. The second point is also an area for article improvement not deletion. Finally, the last point is opinion (). Sceptre has not given any valid reason why the article should be deleted.  Should it be re-written?  Yes - it is a mess. But once again, not a reason for deletion.  It looks like someone is already working on cleaning it up, too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: is required by , since it makes very damaging statements about living athletes which lack any inline citations. The BLP policy requires that "badly written biographies of living persons should be |stubbed or |deleted (see #Remove unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material)." Making a lot of statements of guilt for various rule violations and then just listing some references at the bottom of the page is completely unacceptable. I have blanked the text, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:DELETE||WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:stub)