Deletion of WATMM

Comment: although the site and group seem interesting. Noone outside of wikipedia, the site itself and blogs appear to have written specifically about it. No news articles or other |reliable sources have show interest in the site. Although everything in the article may be true we cannot write an encyclopediac article without independant sources. The site fails the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (web
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: In spite of the claims of notability in "news source references" asserted above, these resources are either blogs or incidental mentions in articles about a different topic.  Zero |reliable sources to establish  for this website.  Claims of notable persons accessing/using their website or incoming links from other notable resources still do not satisfy the lack of reliable sources.  The bar for inclusion based on  has 3 different qualifying circmstances - "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself", "The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization", or "The content is distributed via a medium which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster".  Three chances, three failures.  Three strikes, yer out.  Sorry, but this is just not notable enough for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:WEB)