Deletion of Jodi Byrd

Comment: I'm satisfied that  is met, and I think there's a good case for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: She only has the one book it seems, but it has a lot of published reviews (I just added 12 to the references of the article). I think it's enough for . Her presidency of the Association for the Study of American Indian Literatures gives her a claim to #C6, and also saves her from being notable only for the book. And the nomination statement makes no attempt to address the criteria of  and , and provides no evidence of having done , instead giving a generic and superficial review of the references (before I augmented them) that is not appropriate for these kinds of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I'm not convinced that  is met, but I do believe that  is.  Google Scholar shows 676 citations for ''The Transit of Empire'' and there's plenty of reviews in academic journals
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Notable and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)