Deletion of List of U.S. presidential faux-pas, gaffes, and unfortunate incidents

Comment: If ''"Bush attempted to exit a room in China, but it was locked and so he was unable to leave the room, much to the amusement of the world's press" and "While attempting to enter the Oval Office, Barack Obama mistook a window for the door several feet away''" don't fall under , I don't know what does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment:  is currently disputed. It rightly should be for a number of reasons, one is that it is one of the most misued quoted guidelines in deletion debates. There are 4 sections of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: fails  as noted above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: WP:INDISCRIMINATE - it'd be impossible to maintain as well as being complete 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I've removed a couple of unsourced paragraphs about George H. W. Bush per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per  and as almost inherently pov. It is times like this that I miss 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:BJAODN)

Comment: per both  and, if we were to liberally extend the guidelines for sections to articles, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:TRIVIA)