Deletion of List of Mario Party minigames

Comment: Unencyclopedic list article that fails  as a game guide and  as having no sources to back its assertions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ATT)

Comment: game guide information, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: it is #IINFO|game guide material, |completely unattributable (since no professional journal/news source would ever write individually about each minigame) and the minigames themselves are |not notable outside of Mario Party. There. I've cited two policies and a guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ATT||WP:N)

Comment: as #IINFO|Wikipedia is neither GameFAQs or a gaming wiki. Also, there aren't |any sources or references in the article to verify any of the minigames
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ATT)

Comment: We have no reason to think that this article should be deleted. There has been some discussion as to whether this article (and the 8ish others like it) are encyclopedic or not. I'm sorry, but the policies regarding this are in favor of this article. The most common reason others have with regards to this article is #IINFO|Wikipdedia is not an indiscriminate source of information, it doesn't say that we shouldn't have listcruft like Minor Slytherins, but that if we're to have lists of things like this that it should be encyclopedic information. We use AFD not to say something isn't encyclopedic, but to say that something can't be encyclopedic. All of these Mario party minigame articles *can* be encyclopedic. so quit your complaining, and make it right. (yes, I was drawn here by a small canavs. I'ven't even played this game, so I don't think I'm the right person to fix this article, but I'll see what little I can do. You should probably do the same
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)