Deletion of Elizabeth Lecron

Comment: This woman is accused, not yet convicted. Per  "A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until the contrary is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: as  and . The bombing plot itself might well pass per  (very wide burst of coverage - but currently limited to one burst - recent event) - however given that the article is on the BLP and not on the plot, calling RAPID is not appropriate in my eyes. The individual quite possibly will be notable in the future (i.e. my crystal ball sees more coverage here), given the peculiar nature of this case, however that hasn't happened yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:RAPID)

Comment: obvious violations against |BLP policy. The one thing you could try to argue she is notable for, she is only suspected of. Given that there will be a trial, assuming guilt at this stage also violates |NPOV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)