Deletion of Richard M. Waugaman

Comment: Meets . Key phrase in quote is "...on the field of study." The Oxfordian/Shakespeare authorship research field is the field of study here, not Shakespeare studies in general. In that regard, Dr. Waugaman's citations and published articles would put him within the category of notable/passing the "professor test
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: Does not meet : “The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline ... as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. ... The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly-cited academic work.” '''Web of Science''' records 15 articles by Richard M Waugaman on Shakespeare, de Vere, or authorship, with 10 citations. But only 4 of these citations are by scholars other than Waugaman himself. The other 6 are self-citations, and 9 of these papers have never been cited at all. His two Kindle books are self-published by his own Oxfreudian vanity press. His so-called title, “Faculty Expert on Shakespeare for Media Contacts at Georgetown University” is self-assumed. The only requirement for this informal role is a willingness to be contacted: https://uis.georgetown.edu/web-services/explore-documentation/faculty-information-explore/include-your-profile-in-the-faculty-experts-guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: Not notable for his medical work. As a minor  Shakespeare scholar we need mainstream sources to provide a properly |neutral point of view on his work and how it differs from the mainstream. The Times Higher Education is such a source and, if kept, should be more prominently incorporated into the article text. But as a source for notability I think that article plus the Telegraph article on the same events fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Does not meet  as per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Does not meet  or : as per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:SCHOLAR)