Deletion of List of wealthiest historical figures (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per . The concept of "wealth" is unclear and, in too many cases, it would be impossible to get an accurate reading if we take the definition of history seriously (i.e., the pharaohs of ancient Egypt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: That an article is OR ''right now'' (which this article is) is not necessarily grounds for deletion. Anyone supporting deletion should demonstrate that the subject is inherently OR, and that nothing can be done to change this. We do not delete articles based on |their current quality, with the exception of unsourced negative BLPs and such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: The subject is probably notable, and the article is sourced. I appreciate the definite ''substantial'' concerns over  and , but those are better met through a big watchlist (has 48 right now) contingent, vigorous debate on page, and '''most importantly''' a clear explanation of the ranking criteria. If it comes out that the page is completely misrepresenting those sources provided, I'd change my vote, but as it is now I think this is a keep, but I wouldn't suffer any suggestions that the nominator was wrong in bringing it here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)