Deletion of ESStonia

Comment: I hoped something could be salvaged here, but (see the talk:eSStonia|talkpage) I've now come to conclusion that this is a hopeless RACK article with no hope of redemption
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COAT)

Comment: I do not much care if this article remains or not, I'm here to analyse an obvious breaching of . There are a set of users here who have been violently opposing similar articles about Russia or the Russian government, often because of their own nationalist feelings. I remember how
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: a revenge article, should be deleted per  alone. Because of the Economist article title it may be mentioned in the article anti-Estonian sentiment, but in a much shorter form. (A sentence about this is sufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: pr . The whole story is nothing more or less than a politically motivated http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ESStonia&diff=prev&oldid=265834455 "cheap jibe" according to the source provided by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSOAPBOX)

Comment: Seems the main argument for "Keep" here is . Putin-Dobby,  with http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&rls=en&um=1&ie=ISO-8859-1&tab=wn&q=putin+dobby 118 news hits, certainly looks more notable than eSStonia with its total of  http://news.google.com/archivesearch?rls=en&q=esstonia&oe=UTF-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn 18 news hits
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)