Deletion of List of psychic abilities

Comment: Please review the article, '''I've rewritten it''' in the fashion that I suggested. This is the Wikipedia article that the title "List of psychic abilities" properly denotes, a stand-alone 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: since some of the topics included in this list are clearly notable -- and, indeed, have articles describing them -- it's quite reasonable to have an overview.  I have remedied possible  concerns by means of a Wikipedia:Be bold|bold http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_asserted_psychic_abilities&diff=prev&oldid=220487031 pagemove
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: 1) I prefer a consistent encyclopedia following common standards, and your content is in too much depth for a Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)|stand-alone list in keeping with the English Wikipedia's standards. If there is in-depth material of value on the page then it should be covered in in-depth articles, and there's no use replicating it in this list 2) The existence of well-written, neutral articles on psychic subject matter doesn't make "|your" article neutral. It ain't. But that's just content, which can be fixed, so it's not a reason for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: There is no way that the content of the page can stand as it existed before the AfD started, and as it has been reverted to now. Leaving aside the whole business of it being hugely biased towards a |fringe POV, it isn't appropriate for a Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)|stand-alone list. There is far too much commentary. Such commentary is not appropriate to a Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)|stand-alone list, it's only appropriate for normal articles such as Psychic. Any reliable references from this article can be moved to Psychic. The http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_psychic_abilities&oldid=219629950 version I created is an appropriately formatted Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists)|stand-alone list. The prior main contributor should have a look at some other "List of" articles on Wikipedia and see how they're done, e.g. List of business theorists. However, the |fringe POV is just a content issue and doesn't effect the deletion decision. As I've demonstrated, it's possible to write an appropriate article for the title
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE)