Deletion of Henry Thomas Hamblin

Comment: I do not see how those could possibly meet , the only non-trivial is not independent of the subject.  They could be used as references for the article but not to establish notability.  There needs to be significant in-depth treatment of the subject by reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: what you're referring to is  which with poor grammatical form tacks on "had works in many significant libraries".  This allows in a lot of authors which is a good thing but then there is the "many" and "significant" to weigh.  In this particular case I would honestly say it is only a few significant libraries that hold his works, not many. There are some major university and research libraries among those but few "popular" libraries and no library seems to hold a complete collection of his works.  So it is mixed at best.  I'll change my opinion from "delete" to '''neutral''' because if there is a near-consensus that the number of libraries holding his works is sufficient for notability then I don't want to stand in the way. Still doesn't meet  though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG)