Deletion of Greeneyes (second nomination)

Comment: I don't think there is sufficient evidence to establish notability under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: as the sourcing here is a problem. Wikipedia has established standards for #Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29|verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources|reliable sources, and Wikipedia:Forum_for_Encyclopedic_Standards|encyclopedic standards, which don't seem to be met here. The suggestion to transwiki is a good one, as the material itself is not so poorly written as to be of no worth. The issue here simply is sourcing, and the article does not meet notability guidelines for inclusion here. We have a responsibility to readers to assert notablity and importance, by citing multiple non-trivial published sources, and to adhere to |web content guidelines. Should the consensus favor inclusion, then this article still is in need of serious cruft cleanup
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:WEB)

Comment: absolutely no suggestion of |reliable sources. This seems to have been created entirely from primary sources and tends towards an original write-up. The comic itself appears to be on hiatus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)