Deletion of Helen Keller! The Musical

Comment: to LoE. Nothing promising on http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Helen+Keller%21+The+Musical%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22&btnG=Search+Archives Google News, on http://books.google.com/books?&as_brr=3&as_epq=Helen+Keller%21+The+Musical Google Books or http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_epq=Helen+Keller%21+The+Musical Google Scholar, also no awards as per http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0121955/awards imdb, episode was also not a season opener or a season finale where major third-party coverage could be expected. I.e. it's a completely nonnotable episode. Per /, the article can remain if it contained so much real-world information (from non-third-party sources) that it would be too much for mother articles, but I want to see this effort first before !voting keep. Note to nom: tagging->waiting->AfDing may take longer but will give you better AfD results because interested editors will be given time to do something or live with the results. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:EPISODE)

Comment: I was able to find coverage/discussion in multiple secondary / sources in quick searches in various databases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: there is precedent for the articles, and nominator is wrong to remove content to facilitate deletion. Hard to give much credence to such an obviously |pointy nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)