Deletion of List of fictional Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

Comment: There's no case to answer as the nomination is just a |vague wave to a different topic.  The correct parallel is Lists of fictional presidents of the United States which is substantial.  This topic easily passes  as it is easy to find sources such as ''https://www.sundaypost.com/in10/chat/memorable-fictional-prime-ministers/ The most memorable fictional Prime Ministers'' and ''https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/top-10-fictional-prime-ministers-a8956951.html The Top 10: Fictional prime ministers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:LISTN)

Comment: Per  as listcruft. Making a notable list might be possible, but this needs to be thrown out and completely wholesale rewritten. Right now it's totally indiscriminate. There is already :Category:Fictional Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom in the meantime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: since the list topic satisfies . I have no issue with paring down this list to sourceable instances, but I oppose the lazy-essay WP:TNT because the page history can be preserved and linked to so listings can be reinserted with sources. Below are a few more group/set sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL)