Deletion of Shail Kaushal

Comment: As a general guideline politicians are only notable at a minimum national level. Some politicians who have also been councilors for the Auckland Council are also considered notable, due to the large population (1/3 of New Zealand's population) the jurisdiction covers. Other city/district councilors and Auckland local board members generally are not, in this case the BLP doesn't meet the necessary criteria for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: After a thorough review of the sources available from my own searches, this is definitely a case of . The subject of this article (who I suspect CREATED the article) does not meet , and the coverage found does not meet the requirement for '''significant coverage in reliable, independent sources'''. Please note that requirement cannot be cherry-picked. Sources (plural) should be both reliable and independent, and contain coverage that is significant - all at the same time. I'd also like to ask the article creator to not post an extended reply to every single comment here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I'm not an expert on New Zealand politics, but from what I can tell the subject's position appears to be equivalent to what I would know as a ''borough'' council rather than the actual citywide government — but even in the rare class of cities that ''are'' large enough to NPOL their main city councillors (which I'll grant that Auckland is), the ''borough'' councillors still ''don't'' get an automatic inclusion freebie (even London can only NPOL the members of the main London Assembly, and ''not'' every borough councillor in Hackney or Barking or Croydon.) The coverage here is ''not'' substantive enough, however, to pass  in lieu — Bondj really needs to learn about the difference between |significant coverage that's substantively ''about'' the subject vs. coverage which just namechecks the subject's existence in the process of being ''about'' something or someone ''else''. The coverage ''here'' is mostly of the ''latter'' type, but what ''we'' need to deem Kaushal notable enough for an article is far more of the ''former'' than has been shown here: it takes ''more'' than just ''one'' piece of substantive coverage to clear GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)