Deletion of Dominik Bartmanski

Comment: the subject does not meet |GNG or |PROF. The book may be |notable enough for an article on its own, but that notability does not automatically pass on to the |author
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:NBOOK||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: per the suggestion just above. The book passes , and the biographical material on the co-author can be made secondary (it's not like there's a whole lot of it, anyway
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: As a matter of principle and pragmatic fact I worship at the very feet of {{u|Drmies}} but I disagree here.  The guy's book is reviewed in significant independent sources and thus does he meet  and so we want to keep this one. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Subject has clearly distinguished themselves academically, and the inclusion of the book is set in context of their budding and curious academic career. We lose more by spinning the book out of context into a separate article, at present we have both his career and the book presented in an engaging format as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PAGEDECIDE)