Deletion of Paula Huston

Comment: There are enough reliable, secondary sources (and book reviews) already in the article to pass .  But, Can someone explain why an, "American novelist, short story writer, essayist, and creative nonfiction writer." (or a fan of such) but certainly an SPA devoted to promoting this writer can't manage to write a simple encyclopedia article?  If article crator is reading this, just read a few WP articles about famous and imfamous writers, and get a clue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: got a book review in the NYT http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/24/books/books-in-brief-fiction-034614.html, and has more of a bio at Amazon than here.  I strongly suspect the editor who wrote the BLP simply needs to understand  as part of the means to establish "notability".  I am pretty sure the author meets those criteria, and suggest this AfD be placed on "hold" for a bit
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)