Deletion of List of fictional online services (2nd nomination)

Comment: From :  ''Wikipedia articles on published works (such as fictional stories) should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot. A brief plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic.''  None of these online services are covered in any third party reliable sources; none of them have any real-world context (or notability).  I fail to see how the importance to the plot has any relevance at all on a project that explicitly is not in the business of summarizing plots
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: Should've been deleted last time as #DIR|Wikipedia articles are not directories of loosely associated topics nor are they #LINK|repositories of internal or external links . A list of every time someone mentions a phony website or fake email address, even one that's used by the show or movie for promotional purposes, is not encyclopedic. An article on the specific fiction is free to include fictional websites that are used within the fiction and if the site is |notable within the fiction then an article on the specific site is reasonable. An article on the use of the internet for marketing would no doubt benefit from a sourced discussion of the phenomenon. But a list of every fictional website ever? Unencyclopedic, unmaintainable, unnecessary, unwarranted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:N)