Deletion of Manan Shah (Ethical Hacker)

Comment: per failure of  and . Grayfell's argument covers the sourcing problems here pretty well; if this person were truly notable, there would surely be better sources than what we've got, which boils down to unreliable websites, self-published material, and other Wikipedia articles (|lots of sources does not by itself mean notability). While the mention on https://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/fffec14d-3767-446e-8b95-985e2c0edf92/indias-top-10-hackers Microsoft's Top 10 may have pushed me more towards "keep", it doesn't seem too reliable; does anyone notice how the entry about this subject is in a different font than the rest, and how the grammar is inexplicably lacking? Perhaps it's been hacked into itself, given that the subject is a hacker (ah, irony), but regardless, it doesn't seem trustworthy enough for me. Due to lack of |''reliable'' sources, and extensive, non-trivial coverage by multiple |uninvolved parties (https://www.google.com/#q=manan+shah+hacker a Google search turns up nothing along these lines, while https://www.google.com/#q=manan+shah+hacker&tbm=nws a Google News search turns up nothing at all), deletion seems the best way to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:MASK||WP:RS||WP:THIRDPARTY)