Deletion of Weak Heap

Comment: I've expanded the article. As the subject of multiple nontrivial independent research articles (with double-digit citations) as well as a secondary source (quite rightly chosen as the main source by the article creator) it clearly passes . As for NOTDICT, it is being badly abused here by both the nominator and {{u|GabeIglesia}}. That guideline is about not having articles about words and their definitions, but should say nothing about having articles about abstract concepts that happen to include definitions of those concepts. Or otherwise, how could we have articles about anything mathematical at all? We miight as well give up and be the encyclopedia of celebrities, sportspeople, and film stars
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  per {{cite web|url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01990520|title=Weak-heap sort|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570866712000792|title=The weak-heap data structure: Variants and applications|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-13193-6_36|title=Policy-Based Benchmarking of Weak Heaps and Their Relatives,|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2523707|title=The weak-heap family of priority queues in theory and praxis|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-46541-3_21|title=On the Performance of WEAK-HEAPSORT|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-13193-6_36|title=Policy-Based Benchmarking of Weak Heaps and Their Relatives,|publisher=}}, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.68.9256&rep=rep1&type=pdf "Relaxed Weak Queues: An Alternative to Run-Relaxed Heaps"., etc. Also keep per ; the article has been significantly expanded by {{u|David Eppstein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)