Deletion of Gay Blackpool

Comment: I think #DIR does apply because point 5 has a get-out clause at the end: ''Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "People from ethnic/cultural/religious group X employed by organization Y" or "Restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories like these are not considered sufficient basis to create an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon. See also ...'' This class of establishment is not listed in the yellow pages in the same way that Chinese Restaurants are. OTOH, the page subject promises more than just a list of places to visit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Do we have ''any'' other "Gay (place)" articles? Gay San Francisco, Gay Amsterdam, Gay Paris?  I realize that  isn't a reason for deletion - I'm just really wary of starting a travelog section of wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)