Deletion of Predictions of the end of Facebook

Comment: with Facebook per . No need to keep a prediction page
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: per . This information is better off suited to a page like Criticism of Facebook. As of now, people are not going to find the information in this page clearly
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: with Facebook. A lot of this honestly feels like an essay or piece of original research; it doesn't warrant a standalone article. The fact that one of the sources is John Birh Society is pretty bad as well, but even without that source this is at best a facet of Facebook rather than a standalone topic. Classic  problem
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: I made this article. It passes , which is the criteria Wikipedia uses to decide if a topic merits inclusion. Opposition to this point has said nothing about , which should be the center of AfD discussions. A merge would not work because the main article Facebook is already , so if we put this content there then that triggers the need to split this off into its own article. This deletion discussion is a proposal for Wikipedia:Removal of Wikipedia articles on notable topics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:TOOLONG)

Comment: as Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball. Wikipedia is not the place to predict the future (see section 3 of the guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: to Facebook. The article as it stands is  - the sources do not discuss the subject of "predictions of the end of Facebook", they simply ''are'' predictions of the end of Facebook
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)