Deletion of Shot glass chess set

Comment: This has a not insignificant Google presence. The question is whether it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial written sources who are independent of the subject. I did not find any. Almost all the sites I look at are ''selling'' or ''promoting'' the set. The article's only source, Money Week’s interview with Michael Acton Smith, is only a peripheral mention and, as the creator of the set, he is not an independent third party. Thus, no apparent |notability substantiated through |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:RS)

Comment: Merge with Shot glass. The problem with drinking games is always sources... I wish there was 3rd parties that could back up the claim. I would post my own view saying this game is real and does exist and is played... but that is all  and wouldn't help with sources. How do marginally successful drinking games get cited anyway
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)