Deletion of James Grime

Comment: Not in Who's Who or Debrett's (and they are generally quite keen on Oxbridge dons (incidentally it might be better to say what college he is a Fellow of rather than the fact he doesn't speak Danish)).  Has authored a few op-ed bits for the Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/profile/james-grime - but no full length popular science book.  Generally appears to be too young (I estimate his age to be about 30, and most academics won't meet  until they're at least 40 - implying .  Willing to reconsider in a few years if he continues his career
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I'm familiar with the Numberphile claim to fame here.  Problem is, most of this content is in the form of videos on YouTube.  http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=LRFmLA4AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra His publications in mathematics have only garnered a handful of citations, and he does not hold any honors or elected positions to prestigious organizations.  The best argument I can see under  is #7 (''The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity''), but I don't think there's enough evidence to show "substantial" impact.   fares a bit better.  Grime appears to be a writer for The Guardian per http://www.theguardian.com/profile/james-grime, and has a few pieces he's written there.  Grime has also been interviewed https://www.ncetm.org.uk/resources/8045 here by the National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics, and http://www.statisticsviews.com/details/feature/4170241/A-21st-Century-Man-in-the-1950s-How-Alan-Turings-contribution-is-now-known-by-sc.html here on Alan Turing by StatisticsViews.com, a resource for use by professionals in statistics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am not convinced that the subject passes #C7.  As the criterion notes, a few quotes in the media are generally quite common for academics.  The interviews he has given don't for me rise to the level of "substantial impact" that is implied by the wording of the guideline.  I also don't think a blog at The Guardian is much of an indicator of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)