Deletion of Gourmet

Comment: per , lots of potential here, but certainly needs work. There is a lot more to write about being a gourmet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: The article fails the tests of #The differences between encyclopedia and dictionary articles which are policy.  The existence of the separate articles: gourmet, gourmand, foodie, epicure, fooding and aristology shows that the authors have not the slightest clue about the policy of writing about topics rather than words.  The topic here is Gastronomy or Food and we don't need all these fancy dictionary entries for different ways of describing people who like it, i.e. just about everyone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: essentially an expanded . The current article is of extremely poor quality; for those who claim it can be improved, well, I have to say: prove it. If an encyclopaedic, well-written article can be made on this subject, then it should stay; but as little more than a dictionary definition at the moment, this one should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)