Deletion of Anonymous Coward (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . This has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial references ''about'' the term. I am unpersuaded by the references offered which do little more than mention that the term has been used. Nothing to confirm that its use is extensive or significant. Simply not enough to justify keeping an article about this neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: There is not much more to say about "Anonymous Coward" other than slashdot.org lets you publish criticisms of the latest technologies under the generic nickname "Anonymous Coward" as an epithet Slashdot assigns to contributors unwilling to reveal their names.  After a detailed search, I have found it impossible to source more information on the topic, even for such a widespread term, as there is not much more to say about the topic.  You also run into the problem of  using 'anonymous coward' as a generic phrase much more often than using Anonymous Coward as an online identification. There is not enough  material to write an |attributable article on the topic. Thus, the topic does not meet Wikipedia |notability guidelines and the article cannot meet Wikipedia Wikipedia:List_of_policies#Content_and_Style|article policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:A||WP:N)