Deletion of ProElite 1 (event)

Comment: All three articles appear to be |routine coverage containing simple fight results.  They contain very little (practically no) "well sourced prose" such that the articles are not "merely just a list of stats" ().  I just checked the articles; the first and second event articles contain only a single reference offering coverage of the event itself beyond fight results.  The third article offers three references (which is getting better IMO).  An earlier call in this discussion for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" have produced no results that I can tell, thus the events still appear to fail .  A televised event is not inherently notable.  A first time event for an organization (MMA or otherwise) is not inherently notable.  A sporting event that includes a few notable participants is not inherently notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: because they do indeed seem to pass the  in the sense that 1) they are covered in news articles that list more than just results, which means these articles on Wikipedia can be expanded; 2) they involve champion caliber fighters from UFC; 3) the events were either televised or streamed on a major cable network or MMA website; 4) these events occurred months apart and so are not routine; 5) the first event of any promotion is a sign of notability; 5) other events include tournament bouts; etc.  I could understand an argument to have a list of events like we do for Bellator, but I do not see any real reason to redlink these
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and  as these are major events associated with a major promotion with major fighters.  Events that occur every few months are not "routine".  Moreover, because they could reasonable be merged and redirected to the ProElite article, there is no reason why we would have to delete them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: These events all lack signficant coverage and fail  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: There's a lot of coverage--that's typical of any sporting event.  What no one has yet shown is how the coverage is anything but --"routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article"-- or how these are significant sporting events instead of just another fight card of a new MMA organization
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: or at worst, keep #1 and #2 and redirect/merge #3 back to ProElite... but reducing a reader's understanding of a topic is never a good first choice when issues are addressable. The applicable |guideline indicates that an ongoing series may have notability, and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ProElite+1%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22ProElite+1%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=oDgfT5jZKMW02wWMicinDw&ved=0CA4QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=fc2a061fa472aac1&biw=792&bih=424 "ProElite 1" https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ProElite+1%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&source=hp&q=%22ProElite+2%22&pbx=1&oq=%22ProElite+2%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=119157l119282l1l120844l2l2l0l0l0l1l468l890l4-2l2l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=fc2a061fa472aac1&biw=792&bih=424 PerElite 2" and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ProElite+1%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22ProElite+3%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&source=lnms&ei=ODkfT9-GNOPY2AXi36mZDw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=1&ved=0CBsQ_AUoAA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=1520b380902028d9&biw=792&bih=424 ProElite 3" appear to |have the coverage to meet  and thus allows us |improvable topics. With respects to the nominator, improving a reader's understanding of any topic is always the greater consideration. |Better to improve the improvable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:NRVE||WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:ATD)

Comment: because they succesfully meet  since all the coverage is not .  The first event of a mainstream promotion is automatically notable.  The tournament matches help to determine a tournament champion and received non-routine sports coverage, so they also pass .  Also, we should restore the Bellator events due to their strong national TV presence that justifies both their articles' existence as well as these ones here.   No reason for deletion or redirects of Bellator or ProElite articles is likely to ever exist.  --Special:Contributions/63.3.19.129|63.3.19.129
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: These fail to meet  since all of the coverage is .  The first events of a new MMA organization are not automatically notable.  These events decided no championships and received only routine sports coverage, so they also fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPORTSEVENT)