Deletion of Authentics foundation

Comment: Should be renamed Authentics Foundation, but seems to meet the  and . There's been a reasonable amount of coverage by http://www.pri.org/theworld/?q=node/16584 Public Radio International, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7289220.stm the BBC, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2008-07-27/all-that-matters/27925692_1_counterfeit-drugs-counterfeit-watches-medicines Times of India, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/opinion/09iht-edtharoor.1.14363006.html?_r=0 New York Times (op-ed, so take it for what it's worth) and some more. I'm not hugely impressed by the extent of the coverage, but I think it does meet the criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Significant coverage by reliable secondary sources, as has been provided above by Batard0. Meets the |general notability guideline and the |notability guideline for organisations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG)