Deletion of Wikimedia movement

Comment: I'm not convinced that  has been met with  sources. If three sources that each meet GNG can be provided, I will happily switch my !vote - ping me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:THREE)

Comment: Although the reliability of most sources in this discussion has been easily disputed, there is at least one source above that is likely not reliable (on independence grounds ''and''  grounds), but it seems that discussing the connections of the author with this 'Wikimedia movement' would violate OUTING provisions, which makes it more difficult to assess & discuss the independence of the source. But it'd be quite a shambles if a non-independent source may be considered independent due to Wikipedia rules prohibiting discussing the connection. It's not enough to meet  anyway, but the general note still has to be made
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:SCHOLARSHIP||WP:THREE)

Comment: without  sources attesting to the term "Wikimedia movement" to meet , having an article about it violates our  policy. As a redirect, "Wikimedia movement" is unnecessary; the existing redirect Wikimedia, which currently targets Wikimedia movement, should be retargeted to Wikimedia Foundation. Anyone typing in "Wikimedia" into the search bar will get to the WMF article before they ever type out the word "movement." This is kinda bad because it's  and rather intentionally so: it's the WMF that is trying to coin the term "Wikimedia movement," and maybe they'll coin it, maybe they won't, but we certainly shouldn't help coin it by making a mainspace article about it. We must have multiple reliable independent secondary sources using the term first, before we have an article about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE||WP:GNG||WP:NOR||WP:CITOGENESIS)

Comment: With several books on the topic, it's so obviously obviously notable I'm not going to waste time explaining why. Which is entirely a different question of what and how things should be covered. I.E. '''.''' &#32
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Per reasons and reliable sources indicated above. Article easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)