Deletion of Thrall (Warcraft)

Comment: Fails , unlikely reliable secondary sources can be found to establish notability, and violates #PLOT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:NOT)

Comment: fails lot and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:WAF)

Comment: Nominator appears to have a serious agenda since they talk of nominating over 100 articles for deletion, which will overwhelm the system.  Reasons given by nominator |unsourced, |original research, and |fancruft are grounds for improvement, not deletion, and by nominator's own admission may not be relevant to this article. Nominator claims |unnotable and yet provides no indication of what notability criteria they think this article fails.  Most importantly claim by nominator that topic is non-notable because non-fans would not read it shows a lack of understanding of notability.  I am not a fan of hip-hop or opera - but the 'fact' that only fans would read those articles does not mean those articles are non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE||WP:OR||WP:CRUFT||WP:N)