Deletion of Process (philosophy)

Comment: Massively confused.  There may be a philosophical concept of ''process'' but this article completely fails to say what it is.  Furthermore, all of the cited references also fail to say what it is, or even confirm its existence. So as it stands there is a failure to meet both  and .  The sources all seem to be using the word ''process'' in a perfectly normal way without any special meaning, so this article is also a  violation.  I cannot live with the lede.  The first sentence is all unhelpful waffle and the second sentence says ''process'' is "a property of a dynamic system".  Velocity and rotation are dynamic properties, but are they processes?  A process should have a product, but those properties do not.  The second paragraph might be saying (it is hard to tell) that ''process (philosophy)'' is ''causal process''.  If that is really what it is trying to say, then the authors should start a causal process article and the first sentence should say what a causal process is.  In the meantime we should delete this article as a hopeless case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:DICDEF)