Deletion of Characters and wildlife in Avatar

Comment: and cleanup once the furor has died down.  Why the |rush to take things to AfD, really?  By the time the dust settles, there will be a number of reliable secondary sources about the topic.  No, I don't have a crystal ball, but the media coverage of Avatar is substantial, extensive, and ongoing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: We don't need a page devoted entirely to retelling us the plot in such minute detail that we don't even need to watch the film. Wikipedia is not a substitute for watching the movie. In addition, the page is a clear violation of , borders violating , definite issue of , not to mention . Any real world information is likely going to be pertaining directly to the film, or covered on the film page in general. A brief mentioning about a character in a review of the film doesn't meet the notability criteria for "significant coverage", and unless it can be established that there is such an abundance of real world information about each of these characters that it cannot possibly be covered on the ''Avatar'' film page, then there is no reason to have this page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF||WP:NOR||WP:UNDUE||WP:PLOT)