Deletion of Most Valuable Players (film)

Comment: I'm the primary author. This article is still fairly new, was started only a few weeks ago, and so I feel this AFD is premature. As far as other sources, I'll try to dig some up. The http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/all-freddybox.7232376apr11,0,6969964.story Chicago Tribune just ran the same story as the ''California Chronicle'' above, which even if it's a reprint, shows its receiving wide coverage throughout the country, not just locally. Even putting that aside, the article ''already'' meets  because it is cited with reliable secondary sources, ''not'' the kind of material that F frowns upon (press releases, trailers, advertising, trivial coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NF)

Comment: Passes  and not a case of  (even though I understand that hasn't been cited here).  does not rule things out merely because they haven't happened; it rules out speculative events. This is not a speculative film; the sources confirm that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL)