Deletion of Jihad Beauchman

Comment: as |non-notable inasmuch (a) as the subject's Yale University http://yalebulldogs.cstv.com/sports/m-track/mtt/beauchman_jihad00.html biography and http://www.directathletics.com/athletes/track/80616.html DirectAthletics athlete history suggest that Beauchman did not earn All-America honors (having, instead, been named a finalist to be an Academic All-America and an http://www.ivyleaguesports.com/article.asp?intID=5069&method=text Academic All-Ivy Team member; (b) as, assuming arguendo that Beauchman was honored as an All-America, he is nevertheless non-notable per , which, pace Freelance, I construe to reference, with respect to (United States|American college sports, only those sports that are themselves notorious (meriting, for example, articles apropos of coaches e.g., Rick Barnes or teams e.g., 2005 Texas Longhorns football team), such that those partaking of such sports are likely to be newsworthy or are, in significant numbers, likely to essay profesional careers&mdash;as against those of National Collegiate Athletic Association|NCAA basketball, football, and baseball, participants in NCAA track-and-field are, even those earning All-America honors, are in many cases profoundly unlikely to pursue professional sports&mdash;and (c) as, irrespective of the extent to which the subject's biography comports with , I'm not a particular fan of the broad ''sportspeople'' criterion of BIO.  FWIW, it seems well-settled that any extra-athletic activities undertaken the subject don't confer notability, so it can, I think, be safely said that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:BIO)

Comment: the article's primary claim to notability, at least as I read , appears to be unverifiable as per research by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per Wikipedia:Vanity.  Although the subject should be congratulated for attaining All American status, having ONLY THIS ACHIEVEMENT does not make the subject "widely recognizable" or "memorable" (as per the 100-year test in Wikipedia:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies) or "encyclopedic".  Even if you apply the Google-test, the results can be partitioned into two groups: 1) publications by his alma mater, and 2) results from competitions.  By the way, when  states "at the highest level in mainly amateur sports, including college sports in the United States", I would suggest that the "highest level" in the subject's sport would be at the Olympic Games|Olympic level.  Ultimately, the question is: "Is the subject well known BEFORE being placed as an entry into the Wikipedia?"  The answer is: "No." (And as an afterthought, what about an athlete for a  sport like American football, which is not a game included in the Olympics?  For American college football, the "highest level" would probably be the Heisman Trophy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)