Deletion of W. N. Herbert

Comment: editors talking about "previous afd" may be meaning https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=W._N._Herbert&type=revision&diff=636417878&oldid=574322834| this prod, anyway '''Keep''', subject meets  and , which is now reflected in the article, thanks to {{u|Drchriswilliams}}. A Gsearch brings up lots of useable references ie. he judges notable poetry prizes - "The UK's most valuable annual poetry prizes are in their 13th year and going strong." - http://www.theguardian.com/books/forward2004/0,14780,1267800,00.html, his books appear as recommended reading for university studies, here is a gsearch page that show a number of study programs - https://www.google.com.au/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Strong+Words:+Modern+Poets+on+Modern+Poetry+by++w.+n.+herbert+financial+times+review&start=10, here is another book review - "WN Herbert's informative and witty preface rightly urges readers simply to hurl themselves into the poems,.." http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/jul/06/jade-ladder-chinese-poetry-herbert?newsfeed=true. Could a helpful Admin please "snowy keep" this one, as this appears to be another waste of time, although article has been improved
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The article needs some work but  does not appear to have been followed here. I'm surprised at the suggestion by the nominator that not much shows up on a search. Even a basic search shows a rich spread of coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)