Deletion of Comparison of bitcoin wallets

Comment: unreferenced, and also per : we are not a consumer comparison website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOGUE)

Comment: it is useful content that has been moved off the main Bitcoin article due to . Maybe needs some help with . BTW, Huon you should have alerted the editors on the Bitcoin page of your proposal to delete a sub-page. I have done that for you now. You stated in your nomination, "Removing all unreliably-sourced content would amount to blanking the page." However, there are 8 wallets that I count on the article you nominated that have their own wiki articles, so I can't see how they need citations as well. Do they need citations just to justify being on the list if they have their own articles, I have seen lists of yoga instructors, eg List_of_yoga_schools, that dont comply to that strict standard. I think I will delete the offending content and then we can discuss the article in general
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOBIG||WP:RS)