Deletion of The Social Contract with Business

Comment: My concerns are that the article is mostly an , loaded with |original research, mostly a |synthesis of the idea of social contract with business ethics, with references to the well-known term ''social contract'', and a reference to ''enterprise'', but no references to the full term as a term. I base my finding of original research after doing numerous sweeps of newspapers and magazines with few coming up with the exact phrase ''Social contract with business'' in any kind of consistent sense. So I think Banner (who I've disagreed with at points) is spot-on in his analysis here. Although, to be fair, I did find the term being used http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00382662#page-1 in this article, and a http://books.google.com/books?id=lG-MZtqa8GEC&pg=PA222&lpg=PA222&dq=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22&source=bl&ots=TcA3B2dXYo&sig=_9z7pDxt7Lf6ZIqltlUUKEIAK0A&hl=en&sa=X&ei=H9UtVMCbD-_gsASC6YHAAw&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=%22Social%20Contract%20with%20Business%22&f=false mention here, and a http://www.beitberl.ac.il/centers/ISERC/articles/Documents/When%20social%20issues%20become%20startegic.pdf mention here, but it does not seem like the term has any coherent identity as term-in-use, apart from Jopie Coetzee's book and writings, as if the phrase is used in different senses by different people, vaguely meaning business ethics. Market researcher Daniel Yankelovich used the term http://www.executivesondemand.net/managementsourcing/images/stories/artigos_pdf/estrategia/Exploring_business's_social_contract__An_interview_with_Daniel_Yankelovich.pdf here, but his sense was different from what the current wiki-article is talking about (ie, a "business model"), and senses like http://directsellingnews.com/index.php/view/doing_good_is_good_for_business_the_win_win_of_cause_marketing#.VC3WjPBX9pA here really are talking about something more akin to corporate responsibility or business ethics, similar to http://econ3.upm.edu.my/kelasmaya/sumberkursus/A00215/ACT4193/Mobus%20environmental%203.pdf this mention here. But even these mentions don't appear in the article as references; instead there are hard-to-check book references lacking inline citations -- troubling, considering that the whole article smacks of original research, with references to Coetzee's book. See, if the book references are valid, wouldn't there be a meal-sized portion of easy-to-find inline citations as well? If I search for the phrase "social contract with business" (in quotes) with the following filters, I find nothing in https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22+(site%3Anytimes.com+OR+site%3Ausatoday.com+OR+site%3Aphiladelphiainquirer.com+OR+site%3Atime.com+OR+site%3Amiamiherald.com+OR+site%3Apittsburghpostgazette.com+OR+site%3Achicagotribune.com+OR+site%3Alatimes.com+OR+site%3Asfgate.com+OR+site%3Awsj.com+OR+site%3Amercurynews.com+OR+site%3Awashingtonpost.com+OR+site%3Asuntimes.com+OR+site%3Anj.com+OR+site%3Aboston.com+OR+site%3Anydailynews.com+OR+site%3Adenverpost.com+OR+site%3Anpr.org+OR+site%3Abaltimoresun.com+OR+site%3Acsmonitor.com)&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22+(site%3Anytimes.com+OR+site%3Ausatoday.com+OR+site%3Aphiladelphiainquirer.com+OR+site%3Atime.com+OR+site%3Amiamiherald.com+OR+site%3Apittsburghpostgazette.com+OR+site%3Achicagotribune.com+OR+site%3Alatimes.com+OR+site%3Asfgate.com+OR+site%3Awsj.com+OR+site%3Amercurynews.com+OR+site%3Awashingtonpost.com+OR+site%3Asuntimes.com+OR+site%3Anj.com+OR+site%3Aboston.com+OR+site%3Anydailynews.com+OR+site%3Adenverpost.com+OR+site%3Anpr.org+OR+site%3Abaltimoresun.com+OR+site%3Acsmonitor.com)&aqs=chrome..69i57.358j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=0&ie=UTF-8 major US newspapers, nothing in https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22+(site%3Atheguardian.com+OR+site%3Afrance24.com+OR+site%3Abbc.com+OR+site%3Acnn.com%2Fworld+OR+site%3Achinadaily.com+OR+site%3Acanada.com+OR+site%3Amsnbc.com+OR+site%3Atimesofindia.com+OR+site%3Aiht.com+OR+site%3Atheage.com.au+OR+site%3Aiol.co.za%2Fthe-star+OR+site%3Ajapantimes.co.jp+OR+site%3Ajpost.com+OR+site%3Airishtimes.com+OR+site%3Aeconomist.com+OR+site%3Agulf-times.com)&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22+(site%3Atheguardian.com+OR+site%3Afrance24.com+OR+site%3Abbc.com+OR+site%3Acnn.com%2Fworld+OR+site%3Achinadaily.com+OR+site%3Acanada.com+OR+site%3Amsnbc.com+OR+site%3Atimesofindia.com+OR+site%3Aiht.com+OR+site%3Atheage.com.au+OR+site%3Aiol.co.za%2Fthe-star+OR+site%3Ajapantimes.co.jp+OR+site%3Ajpost.com+OR+site%3Airishtimes.com+OR+site%3Aeconomist.com+OR+site%3Agulf-times.com)&aqs=chrome..69i57.295j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=0&ie=UTF-8 major international news sources, and a sweep of https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22+(site%3Awsj.com+OR+site%3Aeconomist.com+OR+site%3Abusinessinsider.com+OR+site%3Ainvestors.com+OR+site%3Aforbes.com+OR+site%3Abusinessweek.com+OR+site%3Amoney.cnn.com+OR+site%3Afortune.com+OR+site%3Aentrepreneur.com+OR+site%3Afamilybusinessmagazine.com+OR+site%3Aibusinessmag.com+OR+site%3Ahbr.org%2Fmagazine+OR+site%3Abarrons.com+OR+site%3Acrainsnewyork.com+OR+site%3Abizjournals.com+OR+site%3Asportsbusinessdaily.com+OR+site%3Ahartfordbusiness.com)&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Social+Contract+with+Business%22+(site%3Awsj.com+OR+site%3Aeconomist.com+OR+site%3Abusinessinsider.com+OR+site%3Ainvestors.com+OR+site%3Aforbes.com+OR+site%3Abusinessweek.com+OR+site%3Amoney.cnn.com+OR+site%3Afortune.com+OR+site%3Aentrepreneur.com+OR+site%3Afamilybusinessmagazine.com+OR+site%3Aibusinessmag.com+OR+site%3Ahbr.org%2Fmagazine+OR+site%3Abarrons.com+OR+site%3Acrainsnewyork.com+OR+site%3Abizjournals.com+OR+site%3Asportsbusinessdaily.com+OR+site%3Ahartfordbusiness.com)&aqs=chrome..69i57.318j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=0&ie=UTF-8 major business sources did not yield much except two Forbes hits (but I could not find the exact phrase in either Forbes article). And searching using no news filters in the browser bar yields, well, surprise, Jopie Coetzee left and right, suggesting original research. As {{U|Joe Decker}} advised https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Social_Contract_with_Business&diff=611135073&oldid=610179420 here, Wikipedia is not a good place to try to float new ideas
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: mdash;  / . The sources predominantly serve to advance the assertions put forth by the text of the article instead of the other way around (e.g., citing Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, etc). The vast majority of the meat of the article (i.e., the parallel-phrased bullet points) is sourced to "Coetzee, J. 2012: The Social Contract with Business – beyond the quest for global sustainability. Xlibris Publishers, London," which makes for giving  weight to a single source (even if it were a genuine, notable academic concept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: I agree with {{U|Doncram}}, who makes a persuasive point. I accepted the draft on the simple basis that it had rough edges, but met our needs of having sufficient verifiable notability to be  a main namespace article.  does not require perfection. IT simply requires that the draft is good enough and likely to survive a deletion discussion. This nomination puts that to the test. I stand by my assessment when I accepted the article. It has faults, but they are for cleaning up, not for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)