Deletion of Toaru Majutsu no Index terminology

Comment: Terminology should generally be explained when it's used in a plot summary as it is needed to better understand the work. () However, this is simply throwing terms onto a wall and seeing what sticks. The series does a good job decent job at explaining it's vocabulary and most of the terms used isn't necessary to know in order to understand the main article. In fact, most of the article is just regurgitating plot that is better left to the episode/manga/light novel summaries. Because of that, this article will have serious issues with |verifiability and |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:JARGON||WP:V||WP:NOR)

Comment: see , in universe and no evidence of external |notability. Terms can be described as and when needed in the individual article's notes section, a skill that keeps articles readable and informative whilst keeping wikipedia encyclopedic (after a fashion). A list is not that useful as an aid to understanding individual articles and so this argument for keep is not a good one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT||WP:N)

Comment: WP:WEIGHT|Superfluous #PLOT|plot information, cruft. Pointless and unnecessary article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Totally in universe,  and no attempt to demonstrate why this is notable information by wiki standard. it might make a nice page on a fansite, but it's unlikely to become a suitable wiki article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Wikipedia is |neither a dictionary nor a fansite. Inappropriate and excessive fictional detail, and unncessary "glossary" that is entirely unneeded. Any unique terms to the series can be properly explained, on first use, within teh article itself per , without the excessive ness of this list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:JARGON||WP:OR)