Deletion of Nazi UFOs

Comment: Well-sourced article about a long-established theory, not written as if the theory is fact. I see no issues with  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:OR)

Comment: While the article discusses a fringe theory it does so in a balanced manner rather than presenting it as the truth which would be grounds for deletion. I can see no problem with the sources so  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there does appear to be sufficient references to pass , however I am weary to support keep on this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: appears notable enough and is fairly decently sourced.  At the present, seems fine in regard to . Surv1v4l1st
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The article is decently sourced, so I don't see a  problem here; if you do, |then fix it &ndash; the sources are there. This isn't a  because the article is not presenting the Nazi UFO theory as fact. It is a crackpot/fringe theory, of course, but the concept is notable and well-documented. Passes , , and POV. Moreover, after carefully reading through , I think this article is acceptable under that guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SOFIXIT||WP:HOAX||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE)