Deletion of Clear Books

Comment: There's one source, true, but there hasn't been any continual reliable coverage of this company. There's only one article out there, showing a lack of deep coverage of this company. It's just not a notable company. It doesn't matter how many people are supposedly using the software because usage rates doesn't really guarantee notability. If a product or company is that widely used, it's assumed that they'd have enough reliable coverage to pass notability guidelines. There just isn't enough reliable coverage to back up the claims in the single source, nor the claims of the company's president. Since the company's president keeps coming on to re-add the article after it was deleted, I recommend salting the article to ensure that it will not get re-added until it meets the guidelines for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: WP:MILL|Another ''|software company offering software as a service products'' |advertising on Wikipedia.  An incidental mention in an unrelated story indicating that this package has 3,000 customers does not magically turn this business into something that should be remembered in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B||WP:SPAM)

Comment: There's a review but I'm not sure that's a |reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)