Deletion of Suman Sahai

Comment: Obviously notable. Multiple awards. In addition, there is the fact that the subject has plagiarized in her habilitation thesis. This is sourced to a |reliable source (''Labjournal'' is a well-respected German magazine covering the life sciences) and confirmed by a statement from the University of Heidelberg itself. Although not yet mentioned in the article, the subject has also frequently been interviewed on German radio and television, in newspapers in India and Germany, and Indian TV stations. There have been repeated attempts recently to remove the information about the plagiarism from the article, but as far as I can see, the information presented is not a BLP violation (in fact, the article in ''Laborjournal'' is much more negatively-worded than our article). As ''Laborjournal'' writes, the subject is unremarkable as a scientist and would never pass . However, this is a clear pass of  and unfortunately for Dr. Sahai, we cannot only present positive information, nor should we delete biographies of obviously notable persons just because they don't like what we write about them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: Randy gets this one right on the nose, a clear pass of , and there are many sources available that are not being used (so one should not judge solely by what is currently on the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The plagiarism case is too recent to have the long-term attention needed to pass , so I don't think she's notable for that, but the Padma Shri is enough. And, while not the basis for notability, the plagiarism case should certainly be kept in the article; it is well sourced and not mentioning it would be a violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Even without going deeper into the specific notability guidelines for different kinds of articles, I think this one passes the |general notability guideline. Respectfully to the subject, I just don't see how this can not be considered notable and the subject's objections aren't a basis for deletion as far as this editor knows
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)