Deletion of Owen J. Baggett

Comment: per Bushranger above. This is a |BIO1E case, but there is coverage in sources, so an article about the event is appropriate. Distant second choice would be an outright keep, but I don't see deletion as appropriate where there is this level of independent coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a |memorial.  One of the few sites that can be accessed is his obituary.  Being mentioned in several books about the war doesn't cut it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: so that the article is about the ''incident'', which appears notable, not |the person
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: WP:SOLDIER is just an essay, not a policy, and so is just a few editors' version of , with no general authority or force.  The subject appears in multiple books and so easily passes .  Our actual |editing policy is to keep such material, not to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:BIO||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: spaced ndash}} This person passes  and , per
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Google searches turned up no evidence of any notability except for the shooting event, which is only mentioned briefly in reliable sources, nor any evidence that the subject stands out significantly from his many fellow soldriers and POWs. His military career before and after the shooting incident was not out of the ordinary, and he does not meet the requirements of , or any other notability guideline, for that matter. The shooting incident itself is not notable enough to add any substantial notability, and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:EVENT)