Deletion of Jagan Timilsina

Comment: He definitely passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom and Alalch Emis. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The subject doesn't pass . The feature length texts are interviews or repackaged interviews and don't feel sufficiently independent from the subject. They are in between a human-interest narrative and a promotional success story, that seem to appear at the time of the subject's increased involvement with various projects. The Guardian article presents the subject as part of a tapestry of local people, all effectively serving as a backdrop to the main theme of "authentic trekking". Only very small portions from this coverage could be used in an article, which is already reflected in the article's current form which doesn't look very legitimate, and I don't know how one would even go about improving it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: although regrettably so. Interesting character, but does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)