Deletion of Menzoberranzan (2nd nomination)

Comment: I did find one seemingly reliable source that actually does some in-depth analysis of the location https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118921166.ch9 in this book, but a single source is not really enough to pass the .  I'm actually having a bit of trouble deciding what is the best approach to this one.  While the current article is nothing but pure, primary sourced  information on a fictional location that shouldn't be kept, the name of the fictional city was also used as the title of several books that I've found reviews for, as well as a video game that we Menzoberranzan (video game)|already have an article on.  So, should this article be deleted and have the video game's article be moved to its namespace?  Should the article be kept and completely rewritten to be about the coverage of the products that share its name rather than pure, crufty plot info?  Should the whole thing be |nuked and start over from scratch?  Should it simply be Redirected to Drow, where it is already covered?  The only thing I'm certain on is that the current contents of the article should largely ''not'' be kept, but I'm still undecided on the actual process we should go about when taking care of that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:TNT)

Comment: I just don't see this being notable. There's a lot of sources, but it's a fictional place and there's barely any significant coverage - it gets a couple blurbs in a couple book reviews, and there was a video game named after it which was a good sign - but I'd like those who want to keep this to answer, which are the  best sources which support its notability? I've gone thru all of them and the reviews above (apart from the second one as my browser flagged me from continuing) and am strongly leaning delete, but want to see where the !keeps are coming from as I've never heard of this before, and there are a number of passionate contributors here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: per sources added since the AFD started, or '''merge''' to Forgotten Realms. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: With all due respect, I don't see anything in the keep rationales that goes beyond 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)