Deletion of Vaush

Comment: not enough in-depth sourcing to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I believe that Vaush ''does'' meet  for a few reasons. The current state of the article is very different from when I originally moved it to mainspace. For GNG: While I totally agree many s should be removed, there is the worthwhile ''Independent'' deep-dive into online politics that the nom ignored, and a few other independent websites, such as the DailyDot or Meowww, all secondary sources (though the reliability should rightly be called into question). Also, one source that was linked above is an opinion article—not ''great'', but it is something. The bar for what counts as  is above a passing mention in articles, which I’d say would pass. Additionally, this might also pass under  #2: {{tq| Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following}}. He has the largest left-leaning platform on YouTube by views, according to https://transparency.tube transparency.tube (though it’s not really a source). In the end it’s extremely up to interpretation. I do think the article can be improved somewhat more, though. Also, I’m sorry for adding my opinion in so late. I don’t mean to be slithery by doing so, just had lots of things to attend to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SPS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ENT)

Comment: Subject fails . &#8209;&#8209
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Obviously fails  with currently poor sourcing and very little chance of any improvement. A https://www.google.com/search?q=Vaush&oq=Vaush&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0i67i433j0i131i433j0i67i433j0i433j69i60l3.213j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 routine Google search reveals links to his social media profiles ''and'' a Reddit thread titled https://www.reddit.com/r/communism101/comments/kh1iog/who_the_hell_is_vaush_and_why_nobody_likes_him/ Who the hell is Vaush and why nobody likes him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not enough sources for inclusion if and when we get more reliable third party sources we can create another article of this, but it seems like there isn't enough but some references in specific sources which don't focus on ''Vaush'' with the exception of one news story which isn't enough to establish reliability, we use secondary sources and tertiary sources to establish neutrality and without them writing this article neutrally will be impossible. With that in mind "the article will get vandalized often" isn't a |policy on Wikipedia an article can't be deleted because it prone to getting vandalized
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELETION)