Deletion of Dorian Tyrell (3nd nomination)

Comment: There is no evidence that the fictional character meets the |general notability guideline as no reliable secondary source addresses the character describing his reception and impact. All that shows up with a quick |search engine test are tertiary sources or unreliable sources, but no single source that addresses the character in detail giving analytic or evaluative claims. Without this, there is nothing to presume that the article can be anything other than a |plot-only description of a fictional work, material unsuitable for Wikipedia. References used in the article aren't even for the fictional character but for the movie ''The Mask (film)|The Mask''. As the fictional character has no notability outside of the plot of the movie, I believe that the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SET||WP:PLOT)

Comment: not enough reliable coverage to . Some sources verify that this character exists. But you need to do more than name a phenomenon to justify a Wikipedia article. Mainly , which is  what Wikipedia articles are supposed to be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:NOT||WP:verify notability)

Comment: not enough |notability outside of the movie. Article is mainly  with no sources about the character's real world significance. The only sources that mention this character just give a plot synopsis with no coverage "directly in detail" about the character (see ). See also |writing about fiction. Nothing significant to say here that isn't already covered in the main plot in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PLOT||WP:GNG||WP:WAF)