Deletion of Rania Khan (2nd nomination)

Comment: She is a local, not provincial politician. The  rule for a local politician is "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage". I live in Tower Hamlets, and promise you that being a cabinet minister under an executive mayor does not make you a major political figure. The onus must surely be on those advocating 'keep' to demonstrate that she has received significant press coverage. Because I've not noticed any press coverage at all, I do not believe she satisfies that criterion. But I'll change my mind in the face of evidence. (Pinky36 may wish to substantiate their claim about being "regularly asked to participate" in media discussions.)  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: Notability is not temporary (see ) so once somebody has passed notability they do not lose it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The article is well sourced, subject is notable as it meets  as well as . As per the consensus on the previous AfD and , the subject is no less notable now than she was then. As per , any specific problems with the article should be addressed through editing not deletion. Also, I fail to see how any of the information within the article is promotional or biased
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NTEMP||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Being a local politician doesn't make them notable enough under , and there is no evidence of significant, independant coverage from |reliable sources to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm changing my mind on this one in light of new information. As an American who has no stake in this person's politics, upon my further examination of the sources she lacks the significant coverage expected of a major politician or to even pass . All of the coverage is either routine coverage by local media or trivial mentions. Wikipedia does not need articles on every councilor and selectman in the world as they lack the coverage expected of them in . In regards to the subject, tweeting stuff like https://twitter.com/RaniaKhan30/status/600966153985531904 this is how you lose support, not gain it. In general, you should try to avoid calling well respected Wikipedian's "misogynist" for upholding Wikipedia's standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NPOLITICIAN)