Deletion of Blaziken

Comment: to List of generation III Pokémon. Per , the subject lacks significant coverage as a fictional character or element, and not in relation to other Pokemon species, period. And if the nominator is suggesting that there is worthwhile material which simply can be better summarized in a list article, then this should never have been sent to AfD and should have been resolved by a merge proposal instead
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per Haleth, no 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: as a compromise. No  but there is a well-organized merge target
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)