Deletion of Spock's Beard

Comment: Subject meets  and, at the least, criteria 1 and 5 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND)

Comment: Clearly notable band that has released many albums on labels that are easily big enough for  #5 and has recieved plenty of coverage, e.g. http://www.allmusic.com/artist/spocks-beard-p291043/biography Allmusic (see also reviews), http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/singer-quits-spocks-beard/ ''Classic Rock'', http://fr.canoe.ca/divertissement/musique/nouvelles/2007/07/06/4320046-ca.html Canoe, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/azcentral/access/1844199551.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Aug+17%2C+2000&author=Michael+Senft&pub=Arizona+Republic&desc=SPOCK'S+BEARD+EXPLORES+PROG&pqatl=google ''Arizona Republic'', http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/spocksbeard-snow PopMatters, ''The Encyclopedia of Popular Music'', etc.. In the absence of any sensible deletion rationale or attempt to follow , I think this could be speedily kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: with a |side of fish. Notability requirements were met a long time ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)