Deletion of Murders of Margaret and Seana Tapp

Comment: On-going coverage from 1984 (I presume - need news archive) to 2018 - and not in a single spurt - meets /.https://books.google.co.il/books?id=dw2xqTVgyPsC&pg=PA134&dq=%22Margaret+Tapp%22+murder+1984&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiah6uMtvvcAhVJBsAKHUToBhYQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%22Margaret%20Tapp%22%20murder%201984&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=2SrcBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA202&dq=%22Margaret+Tapp%22+murder&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjWmc2ftvvcAhWCOsAKHXHpA8IQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%22Margaret%20Tapp%22%20murder&f=falsehttps://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/sex-tape-clue-in-double-murder-of-margaret-and-seana-tapp-in-cold-case-files/news-story/37d0cc4012d1095f514df1a70e2cd972?sv=2e33b286c0653b6537c8b4891dc943d2http://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-08-06/police-apologise-after-dropping-murder-charge/465736https://www.smh.com.au/national/dna-blunder-sinks-kill-trial-20080806-3r6a.htmlhttps://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/outer-east/million-dollar-cold-cases-prompts-calls-to-police-about-inadoris-warrick-margaret-tapp-and-seana-tapp/news-story/34278a12885b0e52daf969c0e4339300https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/a-mother-her-daughter-and-a-murder-case-that-got-away-from-all-20100618-ymx2.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCRIME)

Comment: I have a tendency to see promotional newspaper articles as unreliable, and such I will not see ref 1 as reliable. The third ref is better, but the second one is not accessible , not even through the archive. That leaves 1 reliable source, which is not enough to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: We cannot have an article about every unsolved murder: 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Local news stories do not meet  for the crime that is the subject of this AFD. https://www.theage.com.au/national/dna-blunder-sinks-kill-trial-20080806-3r6a.html The 2008 link is about evidence mishandling. It is not  nor does it meet WP:N guidelines for the crime itself. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/a-mother-her-daughter-and-a-murder-case-that-got-away-from-all-20100618-ymx2.html The 2010 link states "But the Tapp double murder was never famous...Nothing has changed that in a quarter century
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Ping|Paul Benjamin Austin}} has to stop with his excessive |memorial arguments and may have a |Conflict of Interest
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:COI)

Comment: Paul sweetie, I would not have come across this entirely unremarkable murder unless you had namechecked me. Don't hold grudges, and don't be paranoid; as I've told you, checking out a dubious editor's history is a sensible thing to do Seriously, the only slender reason for asserting notability is that a news item has appeared because of a cold cased review; clearly . And also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)