Deletion of NedaNet

Comment: to 2009 Iranian election protests.  |Sources are almost entirely blogs, the existence of this can be dealt with in a single line in a technology section of that along with use of twitter, et al.  An entire article suggests falling victim to , and is allowing WP to be used to promote this network, rather than acknowledge its existence
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RECENT)

Comment: but improve sourcing. It should be noted that reportorial blogs on the newspaper's own website '''are''' in fact considered |reliable sources. These are not some random bloggers. Links to Raymond's website are to document his claims; the veracity of said claims is for the reader to decide. This discussion seems to be dominated by dislike for ESR, which I read as a form of . I'm not going to assume there is any political agenda here, but I'm seeing a lot of unfamiliar names in this AfD compared to most AfDs I've participated in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:DONTLIKEIT)