Deletion of Institute for Government

Comment: There is a bit of a  element here (the institute is not yet up and running); there is not a lot of coverage but some of it is fairly detailed and specific. Apart from the Times article cited above and the references given in the article, there is, also, for example, this article in Financial Times from March 2008http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto030420081519031910. Seems to be just enough here to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:N)

Comment: The director hasn't taken over and the org is new by your own admission.  Wiki is not a  and notability can not be established solely based on what an org might do or accomplish or its leadership
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: A single article on the subject is not enough to merit notability.   states that notability is derived from "significant coverage" - this is clearly not established by only one article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)