Deletion of Cask Thomson (2nd nomination)

Comment: Please review the nominator's reasons for deleting this article before submitting your argument. Please explain why Cask Thompson meets the criteria at both  and , and support your claims using |reliable third-party published sources. Having a biographical article entirely supported by social networking and first-party sources literally suggests that Cask Thomson is important because Cask Thomson says so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND||WP:RS)

Comment: per Ravenswing; subject does not appear to meet  as I can find no significant coverage for this person in |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:RS)

Comment: The definition of notability here is that contained in Wikipedia's policies, not in your dictionary. Please look at the WP: things people have been quoting to you - these are the policies and definitions that are used here. If you show that you are understanding these, and show how you think the article complies with them, more notice will be taken of your posts. Notability doesn't 'trickle down'. Touring with someone notable, or playing for someone notable, does not necessarily make one notable oneself. MySpace is not regarded as a reliable source, and you will find more details about what are and aren't in . I am remaining neutral and hope you will listen to me, and I have completed a sentence in the last paragraph that was hanging. Please check it to see if I've got it right
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I'm with Fezmar ... the SPAs advocating Keep are expounding some startling reasons for their stance.  That they've seen the guy perform?  That he's done charity appearances?  Beats me, but a quick glance at Google Australia gives his top rated hits as this article, his MySpace page, his Twitter page, his eBay page, his website, the user-inputted setlist.fm, the user-inputted songlyrics.com, his YouTube site and his Facebook site, in that order.  A Google News Australia search turns up ''ZERO'' hits.  Certainly this guy is hell-on-wheels as a self-promoter, but before the article can be kept, the SPAs suggesting that |reliable sources certifying his notability exist must ''produce'' those sources.  Period
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)