Deletion of Moneybomb

Comment: Perhaps I'm missing something, but where was the prior AfD nomination?  I only see a couple |CSD deletes in the actual page history, and as for this page there are no deletes; plus, this AfD only has "Moneybomb" in the title (as opposed to "Moneybomb (2nd nomination)").  Therefore, I can only currently assume that this is the first nomination for this article.  If I'm mistaken, please point me in the right direction.  Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: If you actually read |Wikipeida's policy on neologisms, you will see this article does not violate the policy. The policy does not outright ban articles on neologisms. It says sometimes it is appropriate to remove articles on neologisms, and gives two specific criteria for removing the article. The moneybomb article does not meet either of these criteria for deletion. The neologism argument is invalid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: to Ron Paul and Google bomb.  I was initially weakly in support of this article since the term appeared to have some traction in mainstream press, and the term had been used in other (non-Paul) context as early as 2004.  However, it's clear now that the article is just being used as part of the Ron Paul advertising campaign, by Paul's cult-like followers.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article2821161.ece  This Moneybomb article (and other Paul articles) have become a magnet for edit-warring and |soapboxing, and on the Moneybomb article, the Paul supporters are redirecting everything non-Paul (including the 2004 reference) away to other pages. I agree with the  argument, as there seems a clear intent on the part of the Paul supporters to demand "credit" for inventing the neologism.  If they want to make this case on off-wiki websites, fine, but I don't want to see Wikipedia used as part of this campaign.  The least disruptive course, as I see it, is simply to merge this information (that can be sourced reliably) to the Ron Paul article(s), and redirect the "Moneybomb" term to Google bomb, where a mention can be added of the multiple forms of "Money bomb", from 2004 onwards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:COATRACK)