Deletion of Sub-Planck

Comment: to Planck scale, as there doesn't appear to be enough sourcing to warrant a spin-off or standalone article. If the article is kept, then at bare minimum it needs to be '''stubbed and tagged for a complete rewrite''', and the ership issues will need careful attention as well
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: Reads as |original research or novel synthesis.  I checked for reliable sources and found none. The discussions comment that this might be a hypothetical cocnept if it ever gets accepted, which is fine, but it hasn't been yet.  We need peer-reviewed sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: referenced sections to Planck scale ater cutting out the majority of the current article which is primarily, |original research, speculation and essay like prose
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)