Deletion of Fred Alan Wolf

Comment: the least reason for deletion is being at odds with the rest of the scientific community, that is precisely where his notability is derived from. I find it a bigger problem that the article seems to lack secondary sources, therefore a big problem with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: While his theories ''may'' be "crackpot", the man is probably notable enough for an article. An article on his '''theories''' would need much better sourcing. I admit I'm not pleased with the level of sources in the article now but I'm fairly sure good  sources for the man's work and accomplishments can be found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Dweller, unless I missed a -type guideline someplace.  ;-)  Whatever one may think of his ideas, Wolf fulfills ; he has authored a number of popular books that haven't been published by vanity presseshttp://www.wie.org/bios/fred-alan-wolf.asp and his media appearances should be easy to verify.  I see no reason why the article can't be improved (at the moment, it's virtually a stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:CRACKPOT||WP:BIO)