Deletion of Nick Rosen (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Colapeninsula and Schmidt - subject meets  given the above sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Off The Grid'' is notable with reviews in Seattle Timeshttp://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/books/2012908708_br19grid.html, LA Timeshttp://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/18/entertainment/la-ca-grid-20100718, Christian Science Monitorhttp://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2010/0809/Off-the-Grid, Newsweekhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/we-read-it/2010/07/30/off-the-grid-inside-the-movement-for-more-space-less-government-and-true-independence-in-modern-america.html, and Kirkushttps://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/nick-rosen/off-the-grid/, and New Scientist reviewed his earlier ''How to Live Off-Grid''http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/book-reviews/25333811/life-unplugged. Rosen is therefore notable per .  Since these are not obscure publications and were not hard to find, I have to question how much  was done by the proposer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per |#4: "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."  Rosen's multiple works have been the recipent of commentary and analysis in multiple sources. Even without their (yet) having articles on Wikipedia, |they have established their notability, and thus his as their creator... even though he himself is "off the grid". |The article needs work, yes... but not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:NRVE||WP:ATD)