Deletion of Danai Koutra

Comment: per . I think "run-of-the-mill" is far too harsh: she's on track to be a strong performer, but she's not quite there yet. More to the point, we don't have much to say about her yet beyond some promotional links in the media section. It's not the citation numbers; those vary by area within computer science and in some areas those would be good numbers for full professors, so it's difficult to judge by that. But all of her heavily-cited work is student work with multiple authors; she's only had four years after her Ph.D. and hasn't had time to build a track record independent of her advisor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails , taking into account comments above as to what would be in enough for a computer scientist, and clearly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: I could find nothing that shows the subject meets any of the criteria in  (note: the "prestigious" award mentioned in the article is an award from the NSF for junior faculty); the subject also seems to fail to meet  based on searching I've done. Also worth noting that the 'Media' section has three articles, all of which give Koutra a mere passing mention. '''Comment''': This article reeks of COI editing (like the 'Media' section), which can further be seen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Baurelia in its creator's edit history (all of the articles have to do with CS professors at the University of Michigan). In general, this article feels like . Those other articles, I would argue, should be looked into as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:MASK)

Comment: GS profile on GS is quite just enough to pass rof#C1, particularly for pure math in computer science (maybe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)