Deletion of Dawn Brancheau

Comment: Almost all information regarding this individual appeared AFTER the event that made her notable. The fact that she was featured in local news reports could be just as much about her being in the right place at the right time (that is, working when the news cameras showed up). This is clearly a |memorial article fork from the article where her notoriety is derived; almost all the cited information in the article came from the Tilikum article, and that which isn't already there can easily be added. The uncited information is intended to memorialize the victim, not provide any information as to their notability outside of the event that put her name in the papers, so to speak. Further, Kendrick7's word choice above seems to suggest an agenda that wouldn't be compatible with a |neutral encyclopedia. This article is unnecessary by both  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:NPOV||WP:1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: but rename/refocus to her death per  as the article subject's importance rests primarily on her death and its aftermath
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: The foregoing keep arguments, including User:JaconaFrere, have it correct.  reads, unlike some element or factor based benchmarks, as a ''weighting'' benchmark. In addition to the death itself, material is available and should be included (I will try to do so in the next few days) that is reasonably distinct from her death itself: subsequently a groundbreaking legal situation arose regarding release or non-disclosure of the SeaWorld surveillance video and the crime scene investigative images.(refs:https://books.google.com/books?id=_SBzAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA98&dq=%22Dawn+Brancheau%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiO7pOY4fvLAhWELyYKHVsADQI4ChDoAQhGMAc#v=onepage&q=%22Dawn%20Brancheau%22&f=false and https://books.google.com/books?id=ppfoBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA105&dq=%22Dawn+Brancheau%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi814u73PvLAhXG4SYKHSasBnIQ6AEIRTAH#v=onepage&q=%22Dawn%20Brancheau%22&f=false) It has been contended that the post-mortem circumstances and legal arguments gave birth to Florida 406.136, passed in 2011.(2nd ref, and 2 others I am working through). This material is not a good fit for the suggested merge-to articles. Whether or not a rename of this article is appropriate need not be decided at AfD and would logically depend on the article situation after the additional content is integrated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: This animal trainer was indeed murdered by Tilikum (orca)|one of her animals, who happens to be independently notable, in 2010. But she was a somewhat notable animal trainer before that: the article features a picture of her in 2006, as well as a news interview from 2000.http://www.wesh.com/wesh-2-interviewed-late-seaworld-trainer-in-2000/13533140 Her death has had a lasting legacy (which a click on the "news" link above confirms in the last week alonehttps://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dawn+Brancheau%22&tbm=nws) in part by spawning a notable documentary (Blackfish (film)). Dawn Brancheau wasn't just some random tourist who fell into a shark tank and as such  should not apply; this plainly isn't a case for which that policy was created
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)