Deletion of Edvin Hebovija

Comment: None of these fighters meet the requirements at  and if they're not notable as fighters, then what are the notable for?  The articles mentioned above tend to be of the "so and so will be fighting at ..." or "so and so fought at x" type.  None of them seem to be the significant coverage required by .  They're more of the press release or routine sports reporting variety.  Also, Papaursa, would you please make the lists a little shorter next time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MMANOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: I think you could reasonably argue that all of the fighters on the list fail to meet notability criteria.  The four I think should be kept are because they're getting coverage, although not enough to meet , and they're ''unbeaten'' champions of what I think will soon be labeled as a second tier organization.  I'm going to ignore  and think they'll soon be picked up by a top tier organization
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: First, I admit I may have gotten carried away with the number of articles listed--sorry.  I Jethrobt, I didn't change my reasons--all of the articles are listed because they don't meet .  The notability section for fighters says they should have "Fought for the highest title of a top tier MMA organization" or "Fought at least three (3) fights for top tier MMA organizations."  Those are clear, objective standards, especially when there is a list of top tier organizations given.  In addition,  says "Should a fighter not fulfil this criteria, it is unlikely that they warrant an article on wikipedia."  I looked at some of the references given and I agree with Mdtemp's assessment.  For example, when I clicked on the articles for Docyogen I got a "404 error" and a 6 line article covering the results of all 10 fights on the card--hardly substantial coverage "where his strategy and techniques are discussed."  The blog on Eddie Ng claimed that after 4 bouts for a small MMA circuit in England, appearing on the undercard of a new organization showed he "is set to become an MMA superstar."  The articles on Wang were "Andy Wang prepares for MMA Battle" tonight followed by "Zoro stops Andy Wang".  Those sound like exactly like the kinds of articles Mdtemp referred to.  Anyway, this comment ran far longer than I'd planned.  I'm not going to argue point by point over every fighter--every editor is entitled to their opinion.  I simply don't see how any of these fighters meet the objective criteria given at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MMANOT||WP:MMA||WP:MMANOT)