Deletion of Xuande Emperor

Comment: A real emperor up for deletion as not notable?   says that "people who have held international, national or first-level sub-national political office, including members of a legislature and judges" are notable, and I think emperors qualify under this criterion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per . There is no way this is non notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: The correct section under  would be #Politicians, which explicitly states that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As it says at , the basic notability criteria people is this: ''"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published3 secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,4 and independent of the subject.5"'' Not only do multiple (and I mean very multiple) independent sources exist , but sufficient sources are mentioned ''in the article''. And on top of that, I very seriously doubt that any Emperor of China is going to be so "little known" as to not be the subject of a great deal of study and published material (Believe me, historians love this sort of thing. They make a career out of it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PEOPLE)