Deletion of Gary Cziko

Comment: He meets the first criterion of  #1. According to WorldCat, his top two books published by MIT are held by 400+ and 300+ libraries, and in Northern California where I live, they are the libraries of the very best universities such as Berkeley and other UC campuses, Stanford and so on. Google Scholar shows that his research has been widely cited by other academics for decades. {{U|BarrelProof}}, please note that for influential and widely cited academics, there is ''no'' requirement that they be the subject of significant coverage about them in independent reliable sources. Professors are not pop stars, and |GNG does not apply in such cases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: I see no indication of notability in the article or its references. Being a professor and writing a couple of books are not sufficient indications of notability. Aside from there being no indication he is a professor emeritus, being an "emeritus" professor does not indicate notability – it merely indicates retirement (see Emeritus, and also since his faculty profile page says he's in his 50s, he seems too young to be retired, so it's highly unlikely that he's a professor emeritus). What we would need are reliable sources saying his work is especially important and influential, major awards being given to him by some esteemed institutions, etc. We have none of that. The article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Five publications with over 100 cites each on Google scholar is enough to convince me of a pass of #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)