Deletion of Sara Watson

Comment: clear case of . Yes, an artwork she created received a considerable amount of passing media attention, but she has not demonstrated long-term notability (and neither has the artwork). I sympathise with OrenBochman's concerns about the Wikipedia 'gender gap', but that's an argument for creating and maintaining more articles on notable women, not keeping articles on non-notable women like this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: She could be notable by  if she's created an artwork that's received substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources.   doesn't apply to people who're famous due to creating a single art work/novel/play/etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The more consideration I give to , I find it to be a loophole that should be removed from Wikipedia.  Either the subject is notable or it is not, person or otherwise.  So the question then becomes is the event itself notable?  There are no sources available which show that this individual is notable, and the same applies to the art project she is associated with at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)