Deletion of BrowseAloud (3rd nomination)

Comment: Seraphimblade has this one exactly right. It's an article about an event, not actually the software, and if it was presented as an article about an event it would not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to a section in a new article on cryptocurrency-mining malware (Cryptojacking currently redirects to Monero (cryptocurrency) which IMO is a bad redirect).  applies here, in my opinion, despite this software not being a living person. -- Thanks
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: the references are primarily about the event, not the software. This is an article titled as being about software, but is really about an event that would almost certainly fail NOTNEWS if covered in its own right. While not a BLP, it's a classic example of |coat racking and |single event coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: as per ''Gamaliel'' & ''John Cummings'' I see multiple sources from 2004-2018, from |reliable sources . As I stated in the DRV there are additional sources from Africa, US, Europe and New Zealand. Its not one event given the software was given an award in 2004 and involved in a controversy in 2018
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There are adequate sources to show . The recent compromise only adds notability, it does not take it away or make the article an attack
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)