Deletion of Deep voice privilege

Comment: The topic just needs work per our |editing policy.  It's easy to find more sources for this, such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ctqUDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA179 Voice in Charismatic Leadership'' or ''https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2012/12/why-we-prefer-masculine-voices-even-in-women/266350/ Why We Prefer Masculine Voices''.  The development of the page and its title should then follow the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: This article is , prohibited by policy, with a dash of  and/or . None of the sources contain the phrase "deep voice privilege" or even "privilege". Two of the sources discuss the same Duke study that found a correlation between voice pitch and CEO pay, in which, again, the term is not used. Another source is literally (or ''was'' literally, before it apparently became a malware site) a "How to Get a Deeper Voice" product promo site. The final source simply talks about differences in voice pitch. "Deep voice privilege" is not a term that JSTOR finds, so the fundamental claim of the article fails . And, judging by the (unreliable) sources found via Google search that discuss the term almost entirely in a sarcastic and mocking way, this article seems to be an attempt to parody and belittle other kinds of "privilege" articles. There's no reason Wikipedia should participate in this effort, and it's disappointing to see any editor !voting keep here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:MADEUP||WP:NEO||WP:V)