Deletion of Toledano Tradition

Comment: and '''Stubbify'''. The |notablility of the subject, the approach of Warren Kenton to the Kabbalah, has been adequately established. However, the present article does not describe this approach or contrast it with others in a POV|neutral way, rather, it reads like an essay presenting the correctness of the approach as fact and speculating as to how other approaches came to go astray. Moreover, it's not clear the extent to which most of the article actually sticks to Warren Kenton's theory. Radical surgery is needed to correct this, virtually the whole article needs to be rewritten, so the outcome of this AfD should be '''stubbify
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Suggest focusing the AfD on the sole question of whether the subject being presented is |notable and can be |reliably sourced. The question of whether  Warren Kenton's view is notable is separate from whether most religious or academic scholars  agree with it or whether the article describes the relevant perspectives in a POV|neutral way. AfD addresses whether the subject is suitable for an article, not whether the present article is of good quality. Poor quality articles can be cleaned up Meta:Eventualism|eventually. If a merge is appropriate this can be dealt with. Once we address whether the subject is suitable for an article, all the other issues can be dealt with. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:NPOV)