Deletion of Nigam Arora

Comment: I have been looking at the citations in the article. I do not feel that many of the citations themselves are (yet) particularly useful and have made a comment to that effect on the article's talk page giving positive suggestions. There is a huge rash of apparent citations, but these simply refer, in a great part, to journals (etc) and issue dates, but this is not, of itself, a useful citation. We need the article, the title, and ideally the author and the page number in the journal, for example, with paper media. As it stands at present I do not yet view the article as one which verifies any asserted notability. I also deny emphatically the validity of the |personal attacks directed at me in much of the rhetoric above. For the record I neither know nor care who Nigam Arora is, nor do I have any idea who the editor is who is making such impassioned allegations against me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: due to lack of evidence that he passes . Google news search found some court opinions mentioning his name in the case KnowledgeAZ vs Jim Walter Resources (as far as I can tell, a lawsuit over a non-compete clause), but we don't generally allow court documents as sources. Other than that, there are just a couple articles in the Indiana business journal that don't say enough about him to use as sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)