Deletion of Taleeb Noormohamed (2nd nomination)

Comment: I disagree with the initial assessment. The existing references, albeit dead, show that the subject meets  as they are significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. There are some ROUTINE entries, but not all are. The more recent references just expand the concept. As a candidate, the subject does not meet POLITICIAN though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)

Comment: To be fair, the problem here isn't really that the references are dead links — we are allowed to cite stuff to unlinked print-only coverage, so dead links aren't the end of the world if the content can be recovered from an archiving database like ProQuest or newspapers.com. Rather, what's more definitive here is that virtually all of the |reliable sources in the article are covering him specifically in the context of the candidacy itself — everything else the article says about him, in terms of trying to demonstrate that he had preexisting notability for other reasons ''before'' being an unsuccessful election candidate, is parked on |primary sources (and a local-interest magazine listicle) rather than reliable or notability-making ones. And no, the fact that a few pieces of campaign coverage happen to exist does not in and of itself hand a candidate a GNG-based exemption from having to pass NPOL, either — ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election can ''always'' show a few pieces of campaign coverage, so if that were all it took to exempt a candidate from NPOL then NPOL would be inherently meaningless since no candidate would ever have to meet it anymore. So to actually qualify for an article, what he would have to show is a lot more reliable sources covering him in the context of his ''business'' career ''itself'', and that's not what these sources are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: An interesting person who has been engaged in the community, but nothing suggests the subject passes . The existing sources do not mention the subject or include either quotes or passing references. The campaign coverage is not sufficient to pass  as an unelected candidate. While I believe campaign coverage ''can'' assist in determining the notability of a subject, but the usual expectation is that a subject must pass  prior to or independently of any campaign coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: for all of the reasons given in the nomination. I know plenty of people that are engaged in my community, but that doesn't mean they deserve a Wikipedia entry (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)