Deletion of Andrew Benson

Comment: I've fixed / shortened the link refs and I am now 99% sure this passes , most obviously #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: National Academy of Science member; clear pass of  #3. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: and '''Tentative Delete'''. I'm not persuaded by the arguments of Ironholds and Jarry1250. If Benson's contributions to the Calvin cycle were important enough to garner a Nobel Prize, why didn't he get a Nobel Prize?  http://books.google.com/books?id=qHCzrDHajtoC&pg=PA166#PPA166,M1 Footnote 1 in the article certainly doesn't support .  My opinion isn't written in stone, and I might change my vote if the |article improves, but if the current article was the best that could be written, I would !vote Delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:HEY)