Deletion of Douglas Jones

Comment: Non-notable per . The only test he gets close to in the guideline is: ''Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field'', but I doubt the article qualifies under that as it stands. I suggest adding the references from the NY Times and Scientific American to try and establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: since non-notability was the reason for the nomination, I think it is reasonable to refer to the guidelines when suggesting improvements to get the article to a 'Keep' status. If you notice, I added 3 references ''before'' giving my opinion but, since these were essentially sources from the subject's website, I suggested adding the other references. I could have just as well referred to  and  but felt this was redundant. I'm perfectly willing to change my opinion to keep if the policies are met, but don't want to see this get another AFD in a couple of months for the same reason
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)