Deletion of Kodi internacional i ndertimit

Comment: I suspect that (a) the original IBC is copyrighted, (b) the Google Docs link is to what seems to be a literal translation of the IBC with somebody else's copyright and registered marks pasted on top, (c) that somebody has a name very similar to the accountname of the editor who created the article... I will remove the link, per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:ELNEVER)

Comment: I previously redirected it to International Building Code but the article creator restored the content. The Albanian text is just a translation plus some |soapboxing. It's not sourced, per se, unless we count a link to a copy of the IBC (which already has its own article) - the article content itself is just an essay and not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: This should have been speedied when first created, as a foreign-language article on a topic already covered by an English-language article. (See the procedure at rticles needing translation into English, but since it has been translated previously, it may have been reported there earlier. To be sure, I've now reported it myself.) I think I see from the Google translation why the editor will not put it on the Albanian Wikipedia; otherwise I'd do so myself. It's not doing any good here. I have reverted the author's removal of the English translation to make the nature of the article easier to judge, since we shouldn't evaluate things purely on the basis of a Google translation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: there is nothing about the article that meets ,  or , regardless of whether or not it is |harmless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:HARMLESS)