Deletion of List of disputed supercentenarian claimants

Comment: and only weak, because it's probably covered elsewhere in our 110 articles about people who have reached the age of 110.  Keep, however, because it's well-sourced, a rare quality in a Wikipedia article.  If not, then remove the unsourced or questionably sourced content.  I doubt that a nomination of supercentenarian will go far.  Regarding comments about deleting the whole thing because it's a "BLP minefield", the "L" stands for "living", and only the 30 or so persons listed at the top are alive.  I tend to agree that WP:BLP would apply to the living ones-- the inclusion of their names on the list is a statement that they are liars; worse yet, the accusations seem to come from ''websites'' rather than published sources.  Not all of this is a case of .  Opinions that the whole thing is of no benefit are just that, opinions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)