Deletion of Trump Tower (Tampa) (2nd nomination)

Comment: it passes the |GNG by a reasonable margin. Notability isn't dependent on the status of a project; we have plenty of undoubtably notable articles on ''proposed'' infrastructure, ships which have sunk, academic theories which have been discredited, faraway lands which don't actually appear on modern maps, standards which have been superseded, objects which never got off the drawing board, and outright hoaxes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Dricherby. Notability, once acquired, never expires. (Sadly, this is also true of The Donald himself.) It was in the news mere days ago.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47243134/ns/local_news-tampa_fl/t/ex-trump-tower-tampa-site-again-parking-lot/#.T6gqSFLpzkc Good golly, Miss Molly, it was even mentioned in ''Rolling Stone''.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/photos/the-many-business-failures-of-donald-trump-20110511/trump-tower-tampa-0185178 Next time, do a little checking 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)