Deletion of Israel–Kenya relations

Comment: The article meets  standards. This one of the Country X-Country Y pairings where notability is demonstrated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Many, many links to independent 3rd party news sources discussing various aspects of the relations between these two countries were not hard to find at all. I found the following in about 2 minutes with google news:http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/spages/875197.htmlhttp://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,71846,00.htmlhttp://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1137605916852&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFullhttp://www.npr.org/programs/atc/transcripts/2002/dec/021202.sullivan.htmlhttp://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-24547033_ITMhttp://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1196847374298&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFullhttp://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB061FFF3C55157A93C7A9178CD85F428785F9http://english.people.com.cn/200706/23/eng20070623_386943.htmlhttp://www.nation.co.ke/News/world/-/1068/513896/-/sejc8v/-/index.html Obvious room for improvement. Claims that the subject matter is not |notable have been addressed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:notable)

Comment: evidence exists that this is more than merely a multilateral sort of relationship.  Consider this source: http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Mashav%20%E2%80%93%20International%20Development/Publications/1999/Israel-Kenya%20Development%20Cooperation.  This copy is currently at the Israel Foreign Ministry website, but it was originally published in an independent publication and is quite an indepth personal analysis of Israeli involvement in Kenya in the form of developmental aid.  http://nairobi.mfa.gov.il/mfm/web/main/document.asp?SubjectID=2010&MissionID=44&LanguageID=0&StatusID=0&DocumentID=-1 this page, which is actual Israeli government page, so may lack independence, but it clearly shows a close relationship between Israel and Nairobi beyond the fact that their officials may bump into each other at the U.N.  These are countries with clear ties.  The article is a stub, but I have found enough here and at other hits at a relevent http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%2BIsrael++%2BKenya&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi= google search that this is unlike many of the random "X-Y relations" articles in that this one really does have enough source material to pass  inclusion criteria easily.  If you take the same search to http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%2BIsrael++%2BKenya&cf=all google news you find more stuff, including http://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/SP/lib00249,0EB5D8E312E795DB.html this article picked up by the Associated press, and http://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/CSTB/lib00225,0EB36D733AF5A595.html this article from the Chicago Sun-Times.  These are high-level meetings, the last one was an organized summit between the heads of state of the two nations.  I appreciate that the article was a stub, and did not link these sources, but per , one could at least do due dilligence and do a google search before ariving at the conclusion that the article should be deleted.  I have often voted for deletion on many of these articles where the relations appear to not be notable.  This one, however, clearly is based on about 2 minutes of google searching
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:DELETE)

Comment: The topics of articles included in Wikipedia must be notable and the subject of this one fails .  An article about a small part of something does not make the greater whole notable, notability is not inherited in that manner.  This is a basic principle of notability here at Wikipedia.  Some of the editors appear to be confusing notability of a topic with verifiabilty of facts in an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)