Deletion of Queen bootlegs

Comment: per  and . If some of the bootlegs were really notable, they could be merged to Queen (band
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: unreferenced , non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: we don't need bootleg articles on every band, but Queen's certainly not every band. Bootlegs by bands like Queen were professionally made, sometimes with original artwork and people like Robert Plant were/are known to buy them. Today's college kids should know that bootlegs were far more important back in the days when there was no Youtube and no Internet for the public (see Bootleg recording#1970s and 1980s|this and apparently Bootleg recording#1990s and 2000s|this for more info). Even big magazines and newspapers wrote about bootleg releases and notability is ''|not temporary''. With some work this article could change to something similiar to The Beatles bootleg recordings. Is there a certain agenda going on these days to mass-nominate and delete articles related to 60s and 70s rock bands? --''Avant-garde a clue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: what a lovely |indiscriminate list of |unsource original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RS)