Deletion of Fake Four Inc.

Comment: as above, I'm still on delete on this one. The giant list of artists (all sourced to Allmusic, which would list ''my'' band if I bought a drum set) is no evidence of notability for this record label. Where has anyone written ''about'' the record label? The only source that qualifies is the http://ugsmag.com/2009/10/fake-four-inc/ ugsmag.com source; the others are dead links or improper citations such that I can't tell what they are referring to anyway, and one reliable source is not enough. There's maybe one more in http://urb.com/2013/09/13/fake-four-community-speaks-on-ceschi-and-the-prison-industrial-complex-freeceschi/ this article but that makes me think that the label is only notable because of the criminal activity of its creator, and we already didn't keep an article on him. As such, this fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  in particular for content like in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fake_Four_Inc.&oldid=625881904 this revision. The record label does not appear to have done anything notable and has no independent coverage to establish notability per . Looks a bit like a publicity/fundraising campaign for a legal fund for the label's creator Ceschi whose article is |salted for repeated recreation against consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:GNG||WP:SALT)

Comment: The article, while probably inappropriately spit-shined by COI editors, is more notable than the hype would suggest. Before nominating the article, the nominator removed the entire list of current/past artists, which include musicians such as Astronautalis, K-the-I???, Blue Sky Black Death, Open Mike Eagle, Busdriver, and Boy In Static. Meets 's definition of "one of the more important indie labels
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)