Deletion of Jana Sanchez

Comment: she is a notable politician in Texas, would meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: multiple secondary and reliable sources about Jana Sanchez. Aren't these the minimum requirements for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: N)

Comment: passes  largely because of the documentary. Being 1/3 of the featured subjects of a documentary on a major network is more coverage than most candidates receive. By being featured in the documentary, the subject is used as an example of other candidates in the 2018 election
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: per , because Sanchez does appear to be a 'Major local political figure who has received significant press coverage', including because of the documentary, but also because "an unelected candidate for political office ... can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline." Per , there also appears to be extensive coverage of her post-election career as a commentator and activist, which may not be clear from how the references are currently stacked in the article, and this notability further seems to be supported by , i.e. "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Is the subject notable for any of her activities outside of politics?  The answer is easily no.  So that leaves us with the question as to whether the subject meets notability as a politician.  Using the yardstick of , the first criteria is holding an international, national, or statewide office.  The subject has never been elected so clearly, this criteria is not met.  The alternative is significant press coverage.  As Bearcat has pointed out, every politician will get coverage about their campaign.  Is there significant coverage about them aside from that?  The article has a lot of references but it really is just a lot of fluffy padding of articles where her tweet has ben included in some other article.  That is not significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)