Deletion of VKernel

Comment: To answer Patrick, the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=VKernel deletion log shows that the previous version was deleted for 'notability' (presumably lack thereof).  and  explain the general notability guidelines and those for companies. However, looking at the current sources I'd say that http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/021408-7-virtual-management-companies.html, http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/19/21FE-startups-intro_1.html and http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=158907&page_number=10 satisfy the latter's statement that "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources."—Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:CORP)

Comment: Passes , if only by a hair. The http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=158907&page_number=10 Byte and Switch article looks good, I'm not quite sure about http://soa.sys-con.com/node/554661 and http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2008/02/04/daily21-N.H.%27s-VKernel-gets-$4.6M-first-round.html, but I'd call it significant and reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)