Deletion of 2008-09 Israel–Gaza Foreign involvement

Comment: It's  and extremely POV. Clearly belongs on a blog instead of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: In the current form this article is an example of   and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:OR)

Comment: the ''article'', although it may need heavy rewriting to comply with  policies. The subject (foreign involvement in the 2008-9 Gaza conflict) seems to me a notable one; I don't accept that it's a POV fork of 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict, as that article doesn't contain much information on this specific topic (and besides, it's long enough already). The question here is not 'is this article, in its current form, worth keeping?' but 'is this an acceptable subject for an article?', and I would have to agree that it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Firstly for  - it's beyond reprieve. And secondly because |wikipedia is not a newspaper. Thirdly, if we're going to have a neutral, informative article like this (which is definitely a notable topic) the best way is to salt the Earth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:NOT)