Deletion of Wizard (band)

Comment: Their page on their label's site http://www.massacre-records.de/bands/bands.asp?bands=WIZARD verifies that they have released 2 albums with them, which would seem to meet  #5 at least.  From their site http://www.legion-of-doom.de, I can find several reviews of their albums, but I don't know enough about Germany's metal scene to figure out which, if any, of those reviews are from notable reviewers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: per   #5 (notable label). '''Eight''' interwiki links and '''five''' albums with individual articles. Nominator has a pretty bad track record when it comes to trying to find sources before nominating articles for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICCF Finland), so I'm not going to trust him on that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BAND)

Comment: I'm usually quite quick to censure TPH in such cases so it seems only fair to get in his corner when he has a point.  As the nomination points out, there doesn't seem to be much on Google News or Google Books for this band, and so  has been followed.  And, as they've been around for some years, the lack of book coverage indicates that they haven't really made it.  The existence of album articles doesn't help because that seems to be just more of the same - unsupported fanac.  And inter-wikilinks aren't much better because Wikipedia is not a reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Nine albums, five of which also have :en:WP articles? Now the current state for sourcing might be poor, but the nominator is going to need to show better evidence than merely :wikt:whining about their prod being removed |before they make a credible nomination for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)