Deletion of Correlation-Based Priority Assessment

Comment: Article based on a single recent academic paper (primary source in wikispeak) that has '''one''' citation!!!!!!!!!!1111!!!!! |Promotional in nature. Show me that the concept/method is discussed in a secondary source (a book on software engineering), or at least covered in more than one sentence in a ''review'' paper, and I'll change my mind. Don't you love it when wikiexperts say ''keep'' reasoning "no idea what this is about, but it sounds impressive"?! You should also know that in computer science journal papers are generally less important than conference papers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V0N-4JSFV81-3&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=f47c6328adbd77e4f4a0aa457836810f Priority assessment of software process requirements from multiple perspective (already cited) is a  (Journal of Systems and Software), and another  by completely different authors, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V27-4NYSXCH-6&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=6ae07b2816564971827515ebbe58bfc0 A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristics in QF (in Computers & Industrial Engineering), cites the first paper. Both use the term "Correlation-Based Priority Assessment". That's quite enough to establish notability. Re
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)