Deletion of Black Knight satellite

Comment: all the people invoking Google hits should read |GOOGLEHITS
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)

Comment: The Google hits are meaningless per Stalwart111 and RockMagnetist. The article seems to rely mostly on a blog and a podcast, which are not . The TIME magazine article is not actually relevant to the topic. I can find no other relevant RS.  Article fails . -- Special:Contributions/101.117.56.61|101.117.56.61
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: satisfies |GNG. The article cites at least one reliable, independent source devoted entirely to this subject. Skeptoid is a respected podcast, and if we ruled out articles that the author could research in a week, we wouldn't accept newspapers as reliable sources. It also cites some more sources, one of which (a TIME magazine article) I added. The planetarium blog is borderline, per |USERG, but it is described as their "official" blog, so they endorse its contents. Note that the |NFRINGE guidelines only require one reliable source: "A fringe subject ... is considered notable enough for a dedicated article if it has been referenced extensively, and in a serious and reliable manner, in at least one major publication that is independent of their promulgators and popularizers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:USERG||WP:NFRINGE)