Deletion of Black flight

Comment: with a very strong recommendation of a rewrite.  Although I agree with Orangemike's analysis of this article, the term is attested back to http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/csmonitor_historic/doc/511796606.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Jul%2021,%201975&author=By%20Luix%20Overbea%20Staff%20writer%20of%20The%20Christian%20Science%20Monitor&pub=Christian%20Science%20Monitor&edition=&startpage=&desc=Newark%20worry:%20%27black%20flight%27 at least 1975, according to Google News, and the term seems to have notability independent of the |POV/|OR/|NEO use in this article.  These systemic issues will require this article to be rewritten from scratch, but I think a credible article ''could'' be written on this topic.  '''Incubation''' is also acceptable, as it might result in more attention than slapping half a dozen cleanup templates on a mainspace article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:OR||WP:NEO)