Deletion of Chitra Group of Institutions

Comment: This clearly fails the sourcing and significant coverage requirements for . And an alleged 30-year-old academic institution (or "one of India's leading group of institutions.") with an unfinished website and a Wikipedia editor with the same name as the school founder creates a lot of doubt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: what do they think Wikipedia is, that they expect us to publish an article about an institution which cannot even sort out a website or spell "instructor"? At least it has given me a smile, and I now know where to apply when I want a degree in ''Lorem ipsum''. But, to be clear, even if the website were all glossy and finished and plausible-looking, we should not consider an article until there are  references showing |significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, and I don't see any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)