Deletion of Matilde Artero

Comment: this sad one-line stub, and allow it to be properly expanded and sourced through |regular editing. SIGCOV is not a mandate for an actress whose career was non-English and predated the internet by many decades. The individual's body of work from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0037698/filmotype 1926 through 1961 meets  and is http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Matilde%20Artero%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=np easily verifiable.  In http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matilde_Artero&action=history looking at the article history, I have concerns. While respecting the work of New Page Patrol in preventing inappropriate articles, this one was tagged for speedy just THREE minutes after its creation, so I wonder if the tagger found the numerous book sources on the actress to be somehow unconvincing that the |brand new article has any reasonable chance to be improved or sopurced.  The speedy was properly declined, and the |brand new article was then sent to AFD 24 hours later. Even as a new stub, we do not delete notable topics. Tagging for expansion and sourcing would have been far more appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:HANDLE||WP:ENT||WP:WIP||WP:WIP)

Comment: Even before MichaelQSchmidt cleaned up the article it should have been kept as she is inherently nobility per .  Thank you MQS for cleaning up the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)