Deletion of Star Wars 30th Anniversary Action Figures

Comment: The article is written like an advertisement and is . This is the farthest thing from encyclopedic I've seen in a while
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT)

Comment: I'd cite  but this "article" is missing the price tags for it to be citeable. Still, I can't imagine for this to ever be an encyclopedic stand-alone article, there's nothing to merge, the title is not exactly a search term(?), therefore delete. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOG)

Comment: Looks pretty bad, but be mindful that Star Wars PEZ looked bad as well.  For things like star wars (where there is a LOT of merchandizing and the trademark and copyright holders can only police so much), some independent sourcing is likely to crop up.  Try the http://swmerchandise.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page SW merch wiki to look for some guidance on sourcing and also try http://books.google.com/books?rls=ig&hl=en&q=%22Star%20Wars%20Merchandise%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp google books (Beware, MOST of those don't relate to the subject of the article but instead can be used to find books like http://books.google.com/books?id=huqqAAAACAAJ The Official Price Guide to action figures (don't be fooled, official doesn't mean published by lucasfilm or hasbro in this case).  This article may or may not have sourcing to move beyond , but don't sell it short without looking first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)