Deletion of Fix8

Comment: As per Salimfadhley above.  author likely has an undisclosed COI, so any future articles should go through AfC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: Since there is no evidence of reliable and independent sources, I'll say that  is not met.  also suggest the subject is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT)

Comment: ping|User:Salimfadhley}} thank you for your quick reply, I do really appreciate it ... and also thank you so much for confirming my above argument. If CMake article is borderline in terms of notability and we are talking about a tool that is like water to every C++ programmer (they either actively use it or at least they are aware of it), then imagine how difficult (I would say definitely impossible) it is to satisfy the  as you see it. My point is, as I mentioned above, that free and open source articles should merit some leniency when it comes to notability as you interpret it. Otherwise, one can immediately start removing about 95% of existing free and open source articles. Also, thank you for your IRC offer, but this discussion board should be the right and proper place to resolve the issue, where I wish other people would also join this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)