Deletion of Congress of Chiropractic State Associations (2nd nomination)

Comment: I do think people here have oversold how notable this organization is and the importance of the last AFD. The last discussion was a lightly-attended AFD from more than 10 years ago where literally half the !votes were to delete. The closer explicitly stated that it was {{tq|hung either way}}, so it wasn't exactly a boat of confidence that the article didn't see any improvement until less than a week ago.Even though I tried https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Congress_of_Chiropractic_State_Associations&type=revision&diff=928667670&oldid=928223548 contributing to the article, I wasn't really sure this passed  until after {{u|Semmendinger}}'s https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Congress_of_Chiropractic_State_Associations&type=revision&diff=928769376&oldid=928667670 recent additions. &#8211
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I see no reason to overturn the previous AFD.  Simply stating that the article "Does not meet organisation notability criteria" is not helpful, what part of that guideline or how does it apply?  Further, a quick google search shows that the organization is covered in the news on some level and therefore seems to pass .  Plus, articles on national medical organizations such as this one are normally kept.  I don't see any policy violation.  It's a stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)