Deletion of Tory Mason

Comment: User|Chidom }} Has the right of this, and  needs to be watched closer when nominating work in progress. Haste makes waste. Hell, I've had similar starts nominated before I could get back to expand them See for example Arsenal of Democracy that nearly met a similar fate out of the gate. But that editor at least discussed it first. There needs to be a qualifying time limit on any nomination of at least 24 hours after initial starts. Basic courtesy and respect for anothers time, imho. Delaying an nomination a day isn't going to hurt wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: Although passing  usually means the actor is notable, failing  does not necessarily mean they are non-notable.  In particular, this one passes the criteria for  in that he has multiple non-trivial articles written about him, as noted in his article (the articles listed are here: http://www.jumponmarkslist.com/gio/2006/interviews/tory_mason.htm Tory Mason Interview and http://ebar.com/arts/art_article.php?sec=karrnal&article=72).  Although you yourself may not find the actor's contributions notable, be assured that it is not unlikely that someone will want to find out information about him, and Wikipedia is a valuable resource for that.  Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, and we are not subject to physical size limitations.  If a subject passes  there is no reason to exclude him, even if you don't particularly care about him.  *sigh* these AfDs always seem to have a bandwagon effect at the start
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:PORNBIO||WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: fails , does not comply to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:CITE)