Deletion of Status of freedoms

Comment: as the creation entirely novel list topics without a verifiable definition contravenes the prohibition on #OR|original research as illustrated by . As far as I can see, this list, or anything like it, has not be been published anywhere except within Wikipedia, so there is no evidence that it is verifiable, let alone notable. To demonstrate that this topic was not created based on editor's own idea, a verifiable definition is needed to provide external validation that this list complies with |content policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:MADEUP||WP:CONPOL)

Comment: while it is a |good faith effort by a |new editor, to make what ''could'' be a |useful list, this appears to be |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BITE||WP:LIST||WP:OR)