Deletion of List of Edward Said memorial lectures

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: I am still not entirely sure about this, but I find Plot Spoiler's many arguments unconvincing. I do not see why it violates . As Mike Cline asks, which criteria does this violate? "This memorial lecture is not a recognized phenomenon that merits its own article" is just a "I do not like it argument", as is "The LECTURES, which this article pertains to, are NOT significant". The real question is whether the lectures as a whole have been noticed. I would be very surprised if they had not. That is what those who wrote this list should be looking for. Given all the other references I think this can be kept to give more time to find such a mention or indeed until the lectures as a whole receive more notice. There is no strong reason here to delete useful material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: I was the one that submitted the prod and I also attempted to submit it for afd but it somehow got messed up along the way. This article violates otability as well as hat Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia not a directory/listing/encyclopedia of any information. Beyond that, this article ONLY uses primary sources and no reliable secondary sources, meaning it also violates eliable sources. This article adds no value to Wikipedia. A listing of Nobel Prize winners makes sense; a list of minor Said events does not. The fact that memorial lectures for Said take place should be placed in his own article, given that reliable secondary sources exist and is not given undue weight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:W||WP:R)