Deletion of Faunalytics

Comment: per nom. The article suffers from a  and ''imitation'' of a notable subject. Sources mentioned in this AfD are passing mentions and non-independent sources. Also, quotes and opinions by employees and executives of any company, do not constitute significant coverage per CORPDEPTH
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: or userfy. Its bad, but I've seen much worse. It's ore  than , but it |could be fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:SPAM||WP:TNT)