Deletion of Mohammad Ilyas (cricketer, born 1996)

Comment: or '''merge''' into a list of Lahore Blues players if there is such an article. All the sources available are database entries, and it is not enough to dredge up a bunch of match scorecards and dress them up as a biography. There is no actual biographical information. If all the sources amount to a few cells in a table, then that is how the information should be presented. The GNG (specifically ) explicitly disallows articles based purely on numerical database scrapes, and takes precedence over NCRIC, so NCRIC is overruled and invalidated to the extent that it conflicts with GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: For playing in five first-class, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: No significant coverage, only wide ranging databases built on scorecard data, so fails  and . The trivial pass of NCRIC, by virtue of playing part of a one season, does not trump the GNG failure. His opportunities for further appearances have likely been affected by the restructuring of Pakistan domestic cricket (reducing the number of teams from 16 to 6), but there is nothing to suggest he will return to FC/LA cricket based on his performances to date, which also give little confidence any significant coverage exists anywhere. Redirection is an accepted ATD, but no suitable target exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: passes WP:NCRIC having played in five first-class and a List A match. "Dropped because of poor performances" is an |erroneous comment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The purpose of NCRIC as detailed at Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Applicable policies and guidelines is to "provide bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline". Although NCRIC indicates this subject is likely to meet GNG, a detailed search for sources reveals that they actually do not meet GNG. We are left with a biography consisting of a few sentences supported only by statistics, and both  and  make it clear that this unacceptable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:WHYN)

Comment: Lacks significant coverage. Fails , which says sports database entries are not satisfactory to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: Satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: he passes  by virtue of having played both first class and one day matches. Furthermore, there is no evidence presented that he was dropped for performance reasons; rather, Lahore Blues were relegated from the top division of the Quaid-e-Azam trophy, and therefore have fallen outside the purview of first class cricket. Moreover, he is young enough to play more first class matches- he hasn't yet turned 25, so any implication that his career is over is unsupportable. I think the original AfD reasoning is pretty misleading
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: fails , cannot find any coverage of him.  is also relevant here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: Passes  as he have played in five first-class and a List A match which is enough to qualify
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Has played 5 FC matches and 1 List-A match passing him for . Could possibly be redirected to List of Lahore Blues cricketers or similar as coverage is low. Could the nominator please link us to where he's found the player was 'dropped because of poor performances' please
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)