Deletion of Pegasus Award

Comment: what horrible PROMO/fancruft.  Abuse of WP as a proxy for the award website; not what we do here per... everything in . Argh. Just argh
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: selectively (e.g. without the tables) to filk music - I'm just not seeing where this passes  (or ). Unless I'm missing something, none of the sources provided thus far are in depth coverage of the awards themselves; they're coverage of filk music/culture, and mention this subject as part of that one (e.g. "and by the way it even has its own award!"). Not that it matters so much for notability purposes, but it looks like this is also an internet poll rather than determined by e.g. jury, critics, or even members of a particular organization (like the Hugo Awards, which it contrasts itself to on the website, being clear that absolutely anybody can vote to determine the winners). It looks like it has received enough of those sorts of mentions to merit inclusion in the main article, though. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: but selectively merge per Rhododendrites - I'm not seeing  either, there's basically two articles that even count but they only mention the awards in passing. This is an article that relies heavily on primary or non-independent sourcing, and I just don't see significant coverage in my search. (Think delete is a more accurate description than merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)