Deletion of State leaders by year

Comment: Structured list, meets #LINK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This is one of the clearest examples of #LINK that I have seen. In fact I think all the other articles in the series should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Meets  in full, and this is a nonsense nomination by an editor on a  trip. Close with predjuice
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:POINT)

Comment: as per above arguments and developing |consensus.  This not a weak Wikipedia:Listcruft|listcruft.  It is |not merely interesting.  It appears to be a useful project, an |index if you will. This discussion is a |case of the missing snowball
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:LIST||WP:SNOW||WP:consensus)