Deletion of Cheryl C. Lant

Comment: as subject has not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, and therefore does not meet . The sources in the article are Church publications and no more independent than any other organization's public relations output. Search of newspaper databases finds an interesting pattern where apparent non-routine independent coverage (e.g. in ''Deseret News'') eventually shows itself as either written by ''Church News'' staff or derived from LDS newsroom releases. Consensus is that religious subjects have to meet the notability guidelines. Many other religious subjects do, hence the results documented in . This subject does not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES)

Comment: fails  and  all the sources are affiliated. The keep !vote stating that all general presidents of the primary are clearly notable should be ignored as per learly notable and I agree with the analysis of the other keep !vote, which is a case of  and a personal opinion not based on policy or guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:C||WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC)

Comment: Fails  and does not demonstrate adequate notability. The keep arguments are based on opinion, not policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)