Deletion of Gibbs Street Pedestrian Bridge

Comment: Appears to pass  with significant coverage (7 stories/news releases), in multiple independent reliable sources (3 in the Oregonian, 1 each for OHSU, DJC, SWCC, & the Trib) in addition to the several non-independent cites sourced to the City of Portland, which are only non-independent because of the nature of the subject and can't be seen as self-promotion or advertising
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: true it is just a ped bridge, but I prefer policy/guideline based arguments, and this clearly passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The notability guideline does not consider how many there are or what type of object it is, but by |''topics that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time''.  While the bridge was in planning and before approval, there were '''''seven''''' |reliable sources in the article.  Now that construction is underway, there are a full dozen.  The bridge is handily notable enough for the article to remain
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS)