Deletion of SmartTrack

Comment: it doesn't matter really whether he wins or not, it matters if it meets / or not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per point 1 under . Proposed future project this far in the future shouldn't be an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Campaign plank or not, and  or not, don't forget that if it meets  those things are irrelevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)

Comment: seems to meet , regardless of whether the article ends up documenting a failed proposal. CRYSTAL #1 seems to be talking much more about planned things for planned dates, and also states that: '' A schedule of future events may be appropriate if it can be verified. As an exception, even highly speculative articles about events that may or may not occur far in the future might be appropriate, where coverage in reliable sources is sufficient. For example, :Ultimate fate of the universe is an acceptable topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)