Deletion of Catherine Valogne

Comment: the French Wikipedia article is very lengthy but a lot of the sources are offline so it's hard to determine whether they are 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: mainly due to failing  of the sources mentioned in the fr.wiki article. The English Wikipedia article at its present state does not weigh for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NARTIST)

Comment: The French article is all very impressive at face value, but there are no reliable sources - and concerns about sourcing noted above tend to add more question marks. There may well have been a Daum edition of glass based on her design (150 is a small run, though), but there's no ''independent coverage'' presented. It feels very much like she was an arty lady of means, marginally worthy but certainly not "regarded as an important figure or widely cited by peers or successors, known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique."  uses the word 'significant' freely. I can see nothing of particular significance presented in the French article and nothing at all of significance in the English one. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)