Deletion of In the Faxed Atmosphere

Comment: per . I consider the tiny spate of initial reviews to be a  (that is, the mere ''release'' of the album led to its reviews, and there is no indication of ongoing or subsequent coverage in independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: me again) per .  states {{xt|... an album does not need to be by a notable artist to require a standalone article if it meets the General notability guideline.}} More seems to have been written about the album than the band, hence the article content. While I concede that the nominator does have a point about the quality and focus of ''some'' of the sources, I don't see the problem with http://www.adequacy.net/2005/05/the-child-who-was-a-keyhole-in-the-faxed-atmosphere/ adequacy.net or http://www.popmatters.com/shorttakes/2005_04_24_archive.shtml PopMatters. There is, in my view, {{xt|significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject}}. (The "significant coverage" is that the articles {{xt|address the subject directly in detail}}, with at least 3 of the sources I found which discuss the album itself (Stylus Magazine, PopMatters & adequacy.net) meeting .) I strongly believe that this is a well researched factual article and is of encyclopedic value. The other RSs address related topics, and belong in this article unless someone can propose a more appropriate home for all of this content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NALBUMS||WP:RS)