Deletion of Chow-Li law

Comment: Variants do appear online, but no coverage in reliable sources makes this a minor internet meme, not an encyclopedic subject. The cited statements in the article are 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: This |neologism has no coverage I can see in the links provided, and it's just a little bit |coatrack flavored besides.  It more or less rings as |something made up in school one day, if only by the creators, but that would be more or less in name only - this is pretty much a variant on an old adage that says the same thing about literally anything: there is always somebody who is better at what you do than you are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:COATRACK||WP:NFT)

Comment: even if the internet-famous (?) neologism was notable, that article would be a  for the research that produced it (which is on its own unnotable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)