Deletion of Peter Mailer

Comment: Not |notable, other than for |one event. Emeraude, if you want specific policies, then look at  and  - and ask yourself if there is sufficient information about this person in |reliable sources for us to present a neutral, balanced article about him. I cannot see evidence of such coverage, because he is notable for the one event. Also, BLP concerns are absolutely a relevent consideration in AfD, or anywhere else on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:RS)

Comment: Much as I love to see this sort of information about BNP figureheads reach as wide an audience as possible, precedent from previous deletion debates has been that unsuccessful candidates who subsequently get a minor bit of coverage in a news event that would fail  are still not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: fails  as an unelected candidate, forgery conviction only attracted local press coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per : ''In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this guideline, the general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion.'' While dubious for its own article, the material is sufficient to motivate a redirect. Special:Contributions/Victor_falk|''walk
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)