Deletion of Joachim Cronman (2nd nomination)

Comment: A more or less identical article on a certain Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Örbom|Anders Örbom was deleted only days ago, and this seems to be an even more clear-cut case for deletion. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Style_guide#Notability|WP:MILHIST doesn't appear to agree at all that any military commander of any notable military installation deserves a separate article.  quite clearly specifies that "significant coverage" is needed and that it should be "more than a trivial mention". Most importantly, there appears to be no relevant secondary source coverage whatsoever, which is probably the most reliable measurements of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I don't see any evidence of notability, just a commander of a base during a battle, all historically minor. The battle itself doesn't even have an article. Also, this is really just a genealogy listing which fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: According to the article, the only facts about his life are ''"Joachim Cronman (1638-1703) was a Colonel and the Commandant of the Neumünde fortress where he died on March 5, 1703 during the Battle of Neumünde of the Great Northern War."''  The same could mostly be said about thousands of others.  The fact that he was the Colonel doesn't really make that much difference.  The rest of the article is just a geneology.  The article fails to assert any real significance, and therefore would probably fall within the realms of #A7|CSD#A7.  This makes the question of notability fairly clean cut. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Doesn't have the kind of references needed to meet  and appears to be a genealogical-type entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: IMHO, the delete arguments are stronger than the ones for keep. As there is a distinct lack of direct, detailed coverage of this person in secondary sources, he fails . He also fails the  notability criteria (though those are only an essay, so their relevance here is perhaps limited. The argument that WP is |NOT a genealogy service are also hard to ignore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:MILMOS||WP:NOT)

Comment: per Omegastar as a |notable military commander.  It has plenty of |good sources.  Stubs are perfectly acceptable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:STUB)

Comment: Article makes credible claims of notability and provides ample sources to establish meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)