Deletion of Alisa Cooper

Comment: The record will also show that this 'solicitation' consisted of contacting all of '''two (2)''' editors who were already active participants in these discussions. As the relevant portion of  shows, the Arbitration Committee sees contacting only two people as 'common practice'. I have agreed to refrain from contacting anyone else regarding these AfDs, but have still been accused of acting in bad faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS)

Comment: per nom; fails  for notability of politicians.  For my own part, I have been recently canvassed on AfDs where I have !voted against the editor who alerted me.  While nom did alert me to this AfD, and is aware I supported deletion of a similar article, I've: (1) participated in hundreds of AfDs and might well have chimed in on this one anyway, (2) feel this AfD is readily supported on the merits of the nomination, (3) have had
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The nominator, as part of a series of bad faith nominations, has submitted this AfD, despite the fact that previous AfDs on thsi and related articles submitted by this same individual have resulted in decisions to '''keep''' the articles in question. On top of the clear efforts to subvert consensus, the nominator has http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ravenswing&diff=prev&oldid=127029803 stooped to soliciting votes, actions that are almost certainly in violation of anvassing. I strongly recommend that this AfD be withdrawn, given that the process has been thoroughly contaminated by the nominator.  As to the definition of votestacking provided at ANVASSING, '''Votestacking is sending mass talk messages out to editors who are on the record with a specific opinion (such as via a userbox or other user categorization) and informing them of a current or upcoming vote. In the case of a re-consideration of a previous debate (such as a "no consensus" result on an AFD or CFD), it is similarly unacceptable to send mass talk messages to editors that expressed only a particular viewpoint on the previous debate, such as only "Keep" voters or only "Delete" voters.''' It seems undeniable that this line has been crossed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:CANVASSING)