Deletion of Genkou youshi

Comment: No opinion yet. There's a couple of paragraphs in English in {{cite book|last=Seeley|first=Christopher|title=A History of Writing in Japan|date=1991|pages= 184-185|publisher=Brill|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=KCZ2ya6cg88C&pg=PA184&dq=%22genko+yoshi&sig=25TBrMy2oN1w3oX-yJNT-Ok5diM|id=ISBN 9004090819}} Sources probably exist in Japanese but they will be hard to find among the hundreds of thousands of GHits for retailers and every single magazine, government bureau, and school essay contest saying "please submit drafts on ''genkou youshi''" http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=zh-TW&q=%22%E5%8E%9F%E7%A8%BF%E7%94%A8%E7%B4%99%22&meta=&aq=f. I note with surprise that we lack an article on binder paper (yes, yes, 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPDOESNTEXIST)

Comment: Or more specifically, little difference between this and other ''stubs'' in :Category:Paper. I'm not clear what makes this intrisically unlikely to grow beyond a dictionary definition, because |per policy it's the potential not current stubbiness that matters -- I'm hoping the nominator can expand a little on that. (Obligatory Irrelevancy: Oh so ''that's'' what the stuff's called
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:EP)