Deletion of Get On Your Boots

Comment: there's no need to  as it meets the |general notability guidelines with ''significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject''http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/neil_mccormick/blog/2009/01/19/u2_on_you_tube_get_on_your_boots_or_how_the_geeks_will_inherit_the_earthhttp://popwatch.ew.com/popwatch/2009/01/new-u2-single-i.htmlhttp://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/theampersand/archive/2009/01/19/get-on-your-boots-new-u2-single-released-online.aspx
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:GNG)

Comment: per .  This "movement" to delete first-singles-from-album articles began with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Life Would Suck Without You, I think.  It was debatable there, but is just plain foolish here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMON)

Comment: While I have some sympathy that this was/is ing, a quick search on google news reveals multiple sources http://news.google.com/news?q=Get%20On%20Your%20Boots&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)