Deletion of Psychonaut (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article is painfully bad, and it's understandable why someone would want to shoot it in back of the barn to put it out of its misery.  However, |current condition is not a criterion for deletion.  A Google http://books.google.com/books?sourceid=chrome&q=psychonaut&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp book search suggests that finding some sources won't be terribly difficult (although actually rewriting the article may well be).  The five seconds I spent on that search simply reinforce what was found at the last AfD, which is that the article has |potential and should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE||WP:potential)

Comment: AFD is not cleanup.  It is to be expected that the article is imperfect as most of our articles are poor.  Our |editing policy is to keep them in mainspace for further improvement.  Discussion of these putative improvements belongs on the article's talk page, not here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: Hopeless  with zero references, better restart from scratch. Based on http://books.google.com/books?id=qbF44AEMGdcC&pg=PA434&dq=%22Psychonaut%22+-inpublisher:icon&lr=&as_brr=0&cd=15#v=onepage&q=%22Psychonaut%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false this reliable source, I have doubts the article can be anything more than a  peppered with original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:DICTDEF)