Deletion of Eutropia (sister of Constantine I)

Comment: The subject appears as a significant player in numerous histories of the Roman Empire's game of thrones and so is clearly notable.  As with many figures from antiquity, the information we have is limited but it has endured for millenia and so is very .  The worst case would be merger to another page but, as we are spoilt for choice, it is simplest and easiest to leave well alone per our policies  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: to Nepotianus. My examination of the literature finds no significant coverage apart from her involvement in Nepotianus' attempted usurpation. It thus fulfills several of the criteria listed at : there's considerable overlap with the Nepotianus article, Eutropia's article is and likely will remain short, and merging the two would provide useful context in understanding the events. It's less of a notability question and more a question of the best structure for the reader. A merge would improve the structure without resulting in the loss of content. (Thus, WP:PRESERVE doesn't apply.) I'm glad to reconsider if someone can point out something – anything! – that Eutropia did independent of her son
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGEREASON)

Comment: if this were about someone from the 1940s or 1950s, then I would say that they do not meet .  Even if they were from the 1700s, would probably agree with the merge votes above, but this type of referencing from millennia ago, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)