Deletion of Law of Attraction

Comment: Fails , , might pass , but I doubt it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VER||WP:RS||WP:BJ)

Comment: vio NP:NOR-.  Also, author is {{user|AwenStormFool}}, a single user account, and I suspect this article may be basically an ''advert'' for lawsofattraction.com and other sites mentioned, which apparently provide "new age services" for a fee
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I've just spent 3 hours trawling through numerous New Age web sites concerning the "Law of Attraction". They are fairly consistent in their use of this term and mostly refer to Hicks. There are http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Law+of+Attraction%22+Hicks&meta= 79,900 Ghits for "Law of Attraction"+Hicks. The argument that this is "mumbo jumbo" is not grounds for deletion. It is at the moment pure |POV on behalf of editors saying it. Verifiable sources should be provided that say it is mumbo-jumbo, and this viewpoint can then be included in the article. I have been trying to find a suitable source via http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22Law+of+Attraction%22+mumbo+jumbo&meta= 409 Ghits. Maybe someone else can do better. I have moved the page to Law of Attraction (New Age) per above comments
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I don't see why this article was proposed for deletion in the first place. There are http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Law+of+attraction%22&meta= 435,000 google hits. It is quite obvious that this concept is in wide use by many people and the article needs to be expanded to study this. The objections raised so far are |OR and |POV. We're not interested in whether editors think something is mumbo-jumbo. We're interested in whether something is sufficiently widespread and of note to merit an encyclopedia article. This obviously is. I'm sure a lot of people consider consider that Christianity is mumbo-jumbo. That is not a reason to delete the article on Christianity. There is no wiki criterion for "mumbo jumbo". There is one on "patent nonsense" and this is already addressed on the article talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NPOV)