Deletion of Princess Maria-Olympia of Greece and Denmark (2nd nomination)

Comment: There is almost no coverage, and even taking a licence and perhaps viewing the lady as a model, wouldn't cut it either. There is no coverage there either.  The Vanity Fair is all passing mentions. The name is being used to push the brand, unfortunately not the person. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIO)

Comment: based on  and  - not as royalty ''per se
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Personally, I am all for former royalty having their own Wikipedia articles as they represent a system (the monarchy) that governed the entire world for thousands of years and in some regions does to this day. But at the same time it is necessary that the article pass , which it ''does not''. Firstly, the section about her ''fashion career'' in the article spans not more than four lines (one paragraph), which is the same amount of coverage her supposed romantic entanglement with Prince Harry has received, significantly bringing down its weightage. This indicates that her career as a model is still in its initial stages and nullifies the need for the article under . Secondly, if the fact that she is present ''somewhere'' on the Danish line of succession warrants the article's existence then by the same logic, Savannah Phillips, Elizabeth II|Her Majesty's great-granddaughter who is far closer to the British throne than Princess Maria-Olympia is to the Danish one, should also get her own Wikipedia article. And even if her presence as a minor Danish princess is established, the article still fails under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON||WP:NOTGENEALOGY)

Comment: The point I was trying to make is that despite the fact that the amount of information on a socialite or fashion model's career we could write from sources is often limited to maybe a short paragraph or two, the notability of those articles was never questioned. I have not seen any factual argument that support the notion that these socialites and fashion models have no significant coverage and fail  in face of plethora of reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)