Deletion of JLS (X Factor Group)

Comment: per my original nomination). The Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eoghan_Quigg|AfD for Eoghan Quigg noted that WP:MUSICBIO attributes notability to acts "placed" in a music contest. At the time I commented that this probably blew away the deletion rationale (which was the same as this one). But there is certainly plenty of room for doubt. What exactly does "placed" mean? Is this policy supposed to override  or is it itself overridden? And although in the final week of the contest JLS finished higher than E.Q., over the course of the contest, http://xfactor.itv.com/stories/story-detail/item_100567.htm E.Q. generally finished ahead of JLS so you could argue that E.Q. "placed" more highly. And, of course, the AfD for E.Q. was far from clear-cut and the closing admin had a tough call to make - another admin may not have made the same decision. So whereas I agree this AfD was rightly re-opened, I don't think the fact that the AfD for E.Q. closed as keep is, in itself, any reason why this one should. Right now, everything notable about JLS is attributable to the X Factor and IMO a separate article is not warranted. Any non-keep closure should, of course, be without prejudice to recreation if that changes - it ''probably'' will in future, but that is |irrelevant now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Winning an Urban Music Awards|Urban Music Award clearly qualifies this article for inclusion under the  criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: JLS have won an Urban Music Awards|Urban Music Award, are notable under Criterion 9 of  and are about to be signed to record deal with Simon Cowell http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1094768/The-Cash-Factor-Dont-fooled-real-winner-Simon-Cowell.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)