Deletion of A. D. Williams Engineering crashes

Comment: No, it's not even as much as a guideline. While it is certainly helpful to know the conclusions of the relevant WikiProject, we outsiders don't know without some deep looking-into what kind of a consensus formed it, which is a fairly stark contrast with any official guideline. And to MadScot, I maintain that the "guide" still doesn't have any bearing in a deletion discussion; the primary consideration for having an article on a topic has long been the |general notability criterion. And although the project guide certainly states this initially, I don't believe that statements like "it involves unusual circumstances" is actually in line with this, and I doubt any broad consensus could exist for such a vague rule
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: That is a possible solution, but it doesn't really look to me that the company meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Per , a company is notable "if it has been the subject of ''significant'' coverage in secondary sources" (emphasis added). I can find little secondary source references that talk about the company rather passing news coverage of the crashes. Alternatively, the guideline discusses companies that are publicly traded, but this doesn't seem to apply to this company. Hence my comment that it doesn't appear to meet the guideline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)