Deletion of LexJet (2nd nomination)

Comment: as corporate spam; strictly promotional. Even if the subject were notable (which is unlikely per available sources), it would need to be completely rewritten. So  applies anyway. So delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: as it stands, per nom - apart from being blatantly spam, the sources I find for this article are mostly press releases and reprinted press releases. That Chicago Tribune piece is the closest to RS I can find at all. Perhaps your filter bubble is being more helpful to you; if so, we'll need actual RSes for the  this richly deserves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: reading this article is like visiting the realm of the banal and mundane. Thankfully, I was able to finish it before I started snoring. This is totally spam. The sources are press releases, announcements, repackaged press releases, and the like. I do like the Chicago Tribune article; journalistic integrity is present, but this does not qualify as significant coverage. Yet, if we had five or six more like this one, the coverage would probably be sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH - but alas we do not. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion per . Also, this topic fails GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)