Deletion of Avy Scott

Comment: This is a poor nomination and the nom's patronizing attitude regarding Ms. Scott is insulting. The nom neglected to link to our  guidelines, which Ms. Scott seems to pass with over 100 film appearances and four directorial efforts. Furthermore, according to our AVN award list, Ms. Scott won was nominated for two AVN awards in 2004- see AVN Awards 2004. Lastly, the nom's assertion that MS. Scott gets "zero GNews hits" is false. She actually gets 22 News hits http://news.google.fr/archivesearch?q=%22Avy+Scott%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Despite the poor tact of the nominator (what happened to , anyway?), the article does not meet any of the valid criteria laid out in WP:PORNBIO. The only criteria this presently meets is ''wiktionary:dubious|dubious'' at best, which is hardly enough to keep the article. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: In addition to being nominated for 2 AVN awards, she also won (see the first source) a Rog Reviews Critic's Choice award.  In addition to starring in >100 films, she is a director.  Finally, she has been the subject of at least two interviews (which I think is enough to establish multiple non-trivial coverage).  Please keep in mind that the central criterion for  is that "An erotic actor or actress may be demonstrated as notable" if he or she has been "the subject has been covered by multiple sources which are independent of the article subject and are reliable."  The two interviews alone suffice
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: unless sourced and referenced i.a.w.  by end of this AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)