Deletion of Ravi Raghavendra

Comment: Passes criteria 1 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: True, the subject owes some of his notability to his son, but I feel he probably deserves an article based on his own career, too. He's played many supporting roles in notable films, so I feel he would just get through under . He is also mentioned/discussed in various articles from the following news outlets: Sify, The Hans India, The Hindu, The Indian Express, and more. There doesn't seem to be a consensus on the reliability of these sources, however, so I would welcome feedback from others and will update my vote if necessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Definitely fails  and breaches . I agree per nom that the person is not notable compared to his son Anirudh
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as he has some prominent roles in notable films such as being credited 2nd and third in the credits and therefore has claims to pass  criteria 1, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)