Deletion of Ella Schuler

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to appropriate list. Wasn't the oldest in the country, only her state, and nowhere in the notability guidelines does it say "oldest X is notable". References all appear to be typical  old people coverage. Two newsletters from her nursing home, two from the Topeka Capital-Journal (112th birthday and her obituary) and the two external links to KTKA in Topeka. Which I'd argue would all be local coverage because she retired to the area. Even then, there's nothing to say about her other than bare life basics that pad these supercentenarian articles (born, got married, had kids, worked, died). Entry on a list is enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Passes . Special:Contributions/208.54.87.254|208.54.87.254
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There's arguably more coverage here than usual, so I could support a redirect, but the coverage seems to be local and routine, which does not satisfy  and the general notability guidelines. There's nothing here of encyclopedic value that couldn't be reproduced effectively on one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: seems to pass  through sources cited in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)