Deletion of LG Williams

Comment: San Francisco Chronicle July 17, 1999, Artforum May 1, 2011, and Artforum October 6, 2011 provide enough reliable source information to meet . It doesn't help that the editors of the Wikipedia article chose to use sources not independent of the topic. The Tokyo Weekender Magazine sources in the Wikipedia article are written by LG Williams, so they are not independent of the topic and do not count towards . The Village Voice source in the Wikipedia article is a letter to the editor from LG Williams, so it is not independent of the topic and does not count towards . Some other source material: http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/Painter-With-Open-Heart-Henderson-s-rich-colors-2920263.php San Francisco Chronicle July 17, 1999 (write up on work of L.G. Williams), http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2004/Jun/29/op/op03aletters.html Honolulu Advertiser, June 29, 2004 (letter to the editor, not independent); http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/letters-to-the-editor/western-mail-letters/2005/12/09/friday-9-december-2005-91466-16463740/ Western Mail December 9, 2005 (letter to the editor, might not be from above LG Williams, not independent); http://www.thefreelibrary.com/LG+Williams%2FEstate+of+LG+Williams.-a0257129267 Artforum May 1, 2011 (significant coverage #1), Friedman, Julia. ''LG Williams/Estate of LG Williams: Super Window Project'', Artforum (October 6, 2011) (3 sentence coverage, couldn't get URL from http://artforum.com/search); https://web59.asu.edu/directory/person/1904193 Resume at ASU (not independent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: smells like  to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: For those with highbeam access, the artforum article used as one of the two references in the current version of our article can be found http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-2351072241.html here. It covers Williams' works in nontrivial detail, so I'd say it goes some way towards notability (though we'd need more than one such source to pass ) but it barely says anything about Williams as a person so it doesn't really address the |verifiability concerns that have come up in this AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: I can't find any reason that this article meets - no notable coverage to support the inclusion of an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: no evidence the subject meets . To meet  we need significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. Provide some and it might be a different story. Everything so far is either  or pure, unverified . Agree he exists but Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability|Existence ≠ Notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OR)

Comment: I don't know enough about his notability as an artist, but he does seem to exist https://web59.asu.edu/directory/person/1904193 and given that the socks promoting him on Wikipedia live in the same area, he is probably not an imaginary person. His notability as  seems rather marginal though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)