Deletion of Nomophobia (3rd nomination)

Comment: even the briefest search for sources returns enough to satisfy GNG. Just look at the https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=nomophobia number of ''scholarly'' sources which use the term in the title. Yes, it's a neologism, and satisfies . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: the article is well sourced about a notable topic, and the usage of the term does not seem to be concentrated around  but span several years from 2010-2014. I don't think MEDRS applies as the article states "It is, however, arguable that the word "phobia" is misused and that in the majority of cases it is only a normal anxiety". That said I think there is an argument for deleting the SYNTH moving this article to a better name, if one can be found, to emphasize this is not a recognized medical condition but a cultural phenomenon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)