Deletion of Franny Choi

Comment: hi {{u|Timothy.robbins}}, i see that her book ''Floating, Brilliant, Gone'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/floating-brilliant-gone/oclc/995878223/editions?referer=di&editionsView=true is held by around 100 libraries, this may be because it is available as an ebook but there also could be a number of reviews of it out there in literaryland, as long as they're from |reliable sources the student can and them and they will contribute to Choi's notablitiy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: With the addition of the Huffington Post and PBS sources, the subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As a writer, she would need to meet , so we need evidence of whether #1 she is regarded as an important figure, or #3 has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews; or #4 her work has won significant critical attention. The article does not include any reviews, but I have found some eg https://pankmagazine.com/2015/05/26/review-floating-brilliant-gone-by-franny-choi/, https://www.muzzlemagazine.com/franny-choi-book-review.html, https://indianareview.org/tag/franny-choi/, and there may well be more . Looking at the edit history, it appears that this article was created as part of a course. I would suggest that tags for improved referencing could have been added as 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:NEXIST||WP:ATD)