Deletion of List of shibboleths

Comment: The thought crossed my mind, but my problem is that this list is just too indiscriminate and trivial.  Even with a source, why would we want to list every damn shibboleth under the sun?  That just seems silly.  If the consensus is to keep this though, then yes, of course, I would agree that the non-verified material must be stripped in accordance with  policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: This is a feeble drive-by nomination contrary to our |deletion policy.  The article has been neglected, having had an unreferenced tag for some time, even though it did actually have numerous references.  I have added another reference and this was quite easy.  The article is just |imperfect like 99% of our articles and the remedy for this is editing work and talk page discussion, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT)