Deletion of Ronald B. Scott (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  #3, multiple book reviews. Artists such as authors are notable based on reviews or discussions of their works. Reviews include http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/general-factotum/2011/nov/19/mitt-romney-inside-look-man-and-his-politics/ Washington Times, http://www.npr.org/2011/11/28/142802432/five-things-you-may-not-know-about-mitt-romney NPR, http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865551379/Book-review-Book-gives-an-inside-look-at-Mitt-Romneys-life-and-his-political-career.html?pg=all Desert News, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/feb/23/willard-mitt-romney/ New York Review of Books, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/16/us/politics/at-romneys-side-a-determined-running-mate.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 NY Times. Some of these are more significant coverage than others but the quality of sources helps improve the notability. I could probably find many more reviews in commercial databases if requested, this was a quick 2 page Google results
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: what we'd need is third-party coverage of Scott, and we have precious little of that. His own works do not contribute to |notability in the absence of third-party sources discussing him in some detail. As an aside
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: With the book review sources cited above, the article meets  #3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)