Deletion of 1817 Katanga

Comment: I fail to see how  or other notability criteria are met.  Given the number of these space object AfD entries, I would think there would be clear guidelines when they are listed separately or in a group or not at all.  But I have not seen anything like that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  () No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) ―&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO||WP:NASTCRIT)