Deletion of Rory Blackwell

Comment: The person who is the subject is notable. I think this was nominated because the subject/nominator is dissatisfied with his inability to control the content. I would be interested in knowing what specifically Rory finds objectionable. The part he http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rory_Blackwell&action=historysubmit&diff=324200544&oldid=324199206 deleted doesn't seem to contain any material that would invade privacy or violate .&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: http://www.thisissouthdevon.co.uk/news/original-rock-n-roll-star/article-498891-detail/article.html. You pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Subject is clearly notable.  Nominator's basis boils down to a claim of a violation of voiding harm.  But I see nothing in the article that approaches that, and if there were, the appropriate response would be to correct the article, not to delete it.  The subject's dissatisfaction with his inability to control the article content is not a ground for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)