Deletion of Mitch Ratcliffe

Comment: The language of  is unambiguous: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she '''has been the subject''' of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." (emphasis mine)  A thousand quotes from him in articles written about other things does not in any way, shape and form satisfy  as per Ratcliffe himself.  A single convention bio doesn't cut it - '''I''' can link several for when I've been a panelist and speaker at conventions, and that doesn't make me notable.  Is there a single source out there that satisfies 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per my points above.  This is a |marginal BLP where no secondary sources have covered the subject in any significant detail.  His biography is '''not''' a subject of public interest.  He fails  and , if barely.  I'm not sure that we have any provision to keep articles on individuals who are cited in news pieces, but I can assure you that the |general notability guideline doesn't cover it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:GNG)