Deletion of Desiree Jennings controversy

Comment: per nom.  She not notable; I am a newshound and never heard of this "event". Also fails due to , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:COAT||WP:SOAP)

Comment: per ,  and . No way this event meets the criteria at otability (events). Referencing is poor. There's been an hysterical burst of coverage in US fringe sources that has died to almost nothing, with virtually no attention paid to this non-event in most mainstream media or outside the US. Wikipedia is not for repeating material from tabloids and conspiracy blogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:TABLOID||WP:NOTSCANDAL||WP:N)

Comment: per nom and per #NEWS. It's a passing event - an incorrect diagnosis that did not spur any great activity, but disappeared from the public eye
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)