Deletion of Whatcom Volunteer Center

Comment: unless we can get some better references.  I'm going to |assume good faith on Geode333's part for finding the |references we ''need'' (versus just references).  Do this and I'll change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:RS)

Comment: needs references.  Even if all the external links were switched to refs, there still wouldn't be enough to work for the entire article.  If the article was ''drastically'' pared down, to something like a stub, and only included the stuff for which there are external links/references or if references could be found for the rest, than I'd change my mind.  I think the comment made by the person who removed the PROD tag earlier is pretty telling, though. "This page contains information that is not available elsewhere on the internet" sounds a lot like |original research to me, and doesn't inspire confidence in the availability of potential refs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)