Deletion of Musashigawa stable

Comment: Putting aside the personal squabble here, it is clear the stable passes , even if it is separated from the previous Musashigawa stable (which it seems, judging from the stable's own home page, the stable itself does not do: http://www.musashigawa.com/musashigawabeya_abolut/musashigawa_rekishi). Given that it is the revival of a renowned old stable and is headed by a famous former yokozuna, there has been sufficient coverage in the major press in Japan, such as: http://m.sponichi.co.jp/sports/news/2013/03/22/kiji/K20130322005451900.html, http://www.daily.co.jp/general/2013/05/14/0005986375.shtml, http://www.nikkansports.com/sports/sumo/news/f-sp-tp3-20130424-1117194.html, http://fushigitei.jp/4002/, http://mainichi.jp/sports/news/20130502k0000m050009000c.html, http://number.bunshun.jp/articles/-/325587 or http://sankei.jp.msn.com/sports/news/130512/mrt13051214050000-n1.htm. More could be found. Further, while this should probably be checked with WikiProject Sumo, one could presume, given the extreme difficulty involved in founding a professional sumo stable, that it is possible to argue all such stables are inherently notable. While I think this stable has enough independent reliable coverage to pass  criteria, perhaps creating such a precedent is in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG)