Deletion of J. Desai

Comment: unacceptable as a |BLP, due to lack of wp:rs|high quality sources, contravening .  Lack of independent in-depth coverage demonstrates the topic fails GNG and NSPORTS - "#Applicable policies and guidelines|Applicable policies and guidelines" and "|Basic criteria".  Essential biographical material has not been added within an eight year time frame. Therefore, Wikipedia is |not a directory or a website for |indiscriminate collections of information. Also, Wikipedia |"does not aim to contain all data or expression found elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:V||WP:NSPORTS||WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:NOTDIC||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOT)

Comment: Still doesn't meet the |general notability guideline. BLPs can't be left in such a poor state and at this point no appropriate sources can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as no signs of meeting . We are not database site where we should have article on every single cricketer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Only if we can be sure that there are no sources which show that the GNG is met."  This is a high bar. It argues implicitly that  supersedes  and . In similar cases, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Dinaparna, for example, the results was ''no consensus''. In Articles for deletion/J. Bandujeewa and Articles for deletion/S. Indika the result was deletion. It was a different case for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohan Rangarajan (2nd nomination); that article had references
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE||WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: It has '''consistently''' been held that a single appearance at the highest level of a sport is sufficient for . The correct interpretation of "presumed" in WP is that it is considered to be the case, unless there is evidence to the contrary, for '''presumed notability''' to mean the subject is notable unless it can be demonstrated that it is not. In this case, no one has presented any evidence suggesting that the subject is not notable, given that he has played cricket at the highest level and meets  (see CRIC in SPORTS). Furthermore, there have been several precedents in which subjects like this one have been '''kept''' or where '''no consensus''' has been ruled (see, for example, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Dinaparna and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohan Rangarajan (2nd nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CRIN||WP:NCRIC||WP:NSPORTS)