Deletion of JkDefrag

Comment: the only source that meets  is dubious, as it is only used to cite the "commercial defragmenters".  Lack of reliable sources is usually indicicative of a subject that is just not |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: the notability issue is resolved: there are 3 references that meet the notability guidelines. What other issues are still outstanding?  not apply, since the article is not about a web site. Is this going to take long
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: not entirely sure of deletion-worthiness yet, but it shouldn't have to fit the criteria under  IMHO because it's not actually a website. Or a webpage. Other than the primary form of distrubtion (which is over the web), this software doesn't have much to do with the web
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)