Deletion of Bearwood Primary School (2nd nomination)

Comment: Topics are not required to be "special" in any way.  What they require are independent, reliable sources per  and this topic has them, e.g. http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/files/1461031/urn/109836.pdf this report of 15 pages.  Our |editing policy is to keep such material while it is also our |policy not to delete notable material just because some people don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE||WP:CENSOR)

Comment: as per consistent recent procedure (eg: Cavendish School (Camden), rticles for deletion/Grove Primary School, Frimley). The proposed redirect already mentions a similar nearby private school
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: does not meet  or school guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Wokingham#Education per |standard practice
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Passes , no other reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)