Deletion of Mic Crenshaw

Comment: WP:NM for this article boils down to this question: "Are Oregon Artswatch, The Portland Mercury, and Willamette Week |sufficiently reliable to counterbalance the total lack of articles from mainstream media. I lean to "delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WP:NOTFACEBOOK 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLINKEDIN)

Comment: I would say it meets , as it meets criterion 1 due to at least 2 'independent', 'not self-published' and I would consider 'reliable'. I would say that it meets 'reliable' as the newspapers have wikipedia articles about them and it does not mention they are un-reliable. I would say that they however are not subject to the first exception, even though both of citations I chose were 'Q and A' newspaper articles, as I could see no evidence of endorsement or advertising in them. I would also say that the other citations might meet the requirements for the first criterion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)