Deletion of R4eGov

Comment: WP:GOOGLEHITS don't establish notability.  I never claimed that this was a hoax nor that it didn't exist, but that it doesn't meet the requirements of .  As far as the other "cleanup" issues, they are completely valid to discuss in an AFD, especially if the article fails to meet the notability requirements in the first place.  If notability can be established, I have no problem with it's inclusion.   Finally, in regards to the "alphabet soup level of this nomination"... |don't be a dick
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:DICK)

Comment: and clean up ''massively''. ELs do appear to suggest it's widespread, but the current tone reeks of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)