Deletion of Unleashed (events)

Comment: since we haven't heard anything more, I'm changing back to "delete". Normally I'd say an article about a notable subject should be kept, or converted to a stub. But since this was newly created, the notability is borderline, the article is in rough shape, and there may be issues with promotion and , I'm going to suggest dropping it for now, rather than create an abandoned draft. If someone wants to start over again in the future, they can - this discussion should provide some guidance about it. Can we note a consensus to delete, but no consensus on notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The article needs such work that I feel like |blowing it up is justified from that alone. However, in terms of notability, I'm not convinced that the entertainment project itself meets the bar in terms of sourcing. There's enough coverage to build a well-researched and cleanly written article on in the first place. The only two things that I've seen that look like reliable sources are the Ynet-related http://www.mynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4658780,00.html profile article and this glossy German language magazine's http://unleashedparty.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/MQ_Unleashed_article.jpg short piece. Everything else is more questionable, particularly citing what the project says about itself and what non-notable blogs have posted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)