Deletion of Gloria L. Main

Comment: TJM Smith has correctly noted that the subject qualifies , i assure. But i don't know as to what extent will passing WPA help the article's case. On the other hand, she has not been covered significantly by sources and thus, fails  which is a problem. Her books are acclaimed and well-known. The fact that she has not received enough coverage is something to be blamed upon others. An author as good as her must be notable without any doubt. But as the things stand, i fear that she might not be accepted as notable by the majority that complies with notability guidelines. Flaws of such rigid regulations are exposed in cases like these. Everything seems to have come down to what is more important to pass -  or /
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:SIGCOV||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Main authored 2 widely reviewed books; she meets . I've added these reviews and added some context to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Clearly meets . Article does need more independent biographical references however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Passes , and there appears to be enough biographical information available to write about her life and career
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)