Deletion of Lucy Hannah

Comment: Please re-read . I can see no grounds for keeping the article if there was no media coverage of her and hence no refs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: This article was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lucy_Hannah&diff=prev&oldid=178820020 closed as "keep", but relisted after I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAnonymous_Dissident&diff=cur&oldid=prev#AfD_closure_of_Lucy_Hannah queried the closure.  The problems with this article remain the same as when it was nominated: that all the references are entries in in lists, which is fine for including this person in lists on wikipedia, but nowhere near enough for a standalone article per .Neal IRC says above that "she died in 1993 and had no media coverage, and her case was discovered in 2001". If there is no media coverage, then the article can never be expanded beyond a stub without |original research - see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lucy_Hannah&diff=prev&oldid=179279989 this edit for what it looks like when the articles is stripped of original research and unreferenced commentary about her place in the longevity tables
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:OR)

Comment: just due to being a record-breaker - oldest black person ever, and 4th oldest person ever. The claims that she does not meet  are worrying, though, as are the lack of independent sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails  and , due to the lack of substantial coverage in reliable and independent sources. Lists and directory listings are insufficient. The "Gerontology Research Group" is listed as a ref, but I do not see Lucy Hannah in their list of supercentenarians http://www.grg.org/Adams/E.HTM. I also question satisfaction of  since the Social Security Death index reference attribute the info on her birth date to a "family member." Many extremely old people have exaggerated reports of their age, as stated by the US Census Bureau discussion of "false centenarians" http://www.census.gov/prod/99pubs/p23-199.pdf and by other authors http://www.demogr.mpg.de/books/odense/6/04.htm http://www.slate.com/id/2148550/ and I would like to see additional reliable sources who have done investigations to verify the claim. Census record searches often conflate the records of different individuals with the same or similar names. Birth records of Blacks in Alabama in the 1870's were pretty scant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:V)