Deletion of Love Razer

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in the future if their notability claim and sourceability improve. Passing GNG is not just a matter of showing that three hits of media coverage exist, and therefore the band is automatically exempted from having to actually have any notability claim more substantive than "media coverage exists" — GNG also takes into account the depth of coverage, the geographic range of where the sources are coming from, and the context of what the topic is getting coverage ''for''. Bands are a topic that can frequently show a few hits of purely local coverage in purely local interest contexts in their hometowns, even while having no national profile and no extralocal coverage — see also city councillors, school board trustees, owners of non-chain local restaurants, high school athletes, winners of local poetry contests, etc. — so we don't just count the number of footnotes that represent real media outlets and keep anything that gets to three, we consider other factors as well. But the ''Windsor Star'' is the local newspaper in their hometown; ''Windsor Life'' is a local-interest magazine; the "iHeartRadio" source is really from CIMX-FM, a local radio station in Windsor, and does not reify into nationalized coverage just because 89X happens to be owned by a national media conglomerate; and while the ''Huffington Post'' can be a useful source in some contexts, it's weakened here by the fact that the HuffPo citation's author is the ''same'' blogger who's responsible for seven of the bad footnotes to |blogs, which means it's here in the "HuffPo as group blog" sense rather than the "HuffPo as aggregator of syndicated real news" sense. So this simply is not enough coverage to exempt them from having to get over one or more of NMUSIC's achievement-based criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BLOGS)