Deletion of Dead Playboy Playmates

Comment: per nom. Fails #MEMORIAL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per . RIP, Anna Nicole
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: my attempt to stop this avalanche revolves around the selection bias for  on articles of a sensitive moral nature.  Most people are unwilling to say positive things about Playboy related articles, lists, categories and templates.  This is true of people who are in fact supportive.  They are just unwilling to say so.  I have managed to get several pages like Playboy Online undeleted noting this as part of my argument. I realize that my argument is likely to fall on deaf ears, but this is an encyclopedi article.  If delete please merge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:XFD)

Comment: Fails , . Also , of course, . Please find  to see why it talks about not using "does no harm" as a keep rationale
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:NOHARM)

Comment: Listcruft with potential  problems. I can't imagine any use of this article aside from either a strange morbidity or some moral didactic intention to show that Playmates go to a bad end or both
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)