Deletion of University of Oregon rowing team

Comment: with University of Oregon#Athletics.  The |team itself isn't notable but there's substantial content on the page which is encyclopedic and useful
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: I see no reason why an article of this size should be merged. Clearly meets . Surprising this is even discussed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I have removed the text that violated copyright. The article still needs editing, but at least it is not a blatant violation. Earwig's analysis yields 99.1% confidence of copyvio. (Earwig was running inconsistently, however, and the scholarsbank.uoregon.edu site took too long to respond the first time I ran it.) There does not appear to be any way to salvage this article in its current state, short of contacting the author of the dissertation that is the source for this copyvio to ask for a declaration of public domain or CC-by-SA copyright license.  may seem harsh, but WP policy is clear on the subject of copyvio, with good reason. Even though it's a club sport, rowing probably deserves its own article, but one that summarizes and paraphrases reliable sources appropriately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: This discussion page was created without the {{tl|afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log.  Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination ''per se'', except for vague, non-policy-based preferences based on being a UO alum myself.  {{ping|Darryl.P.Pike}} For future nominations, please carefully and fully follow the instructions at .  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: copyvio issues aside, I don't see how this meets . In particular the sourcing fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:AUD)