Deletion of Kendra Timmins (2nd nomination)

Comment: unfortunately, it's not even close: I have found ''zero'' mentions of Timmins not only at the usual television media publications (e.g. ''Variety'', ''THR'', ''EW'', ''LA Times'', ''Deadline'', and ''TVLine'') but I also can't even find mentions of her in major Canadian media (e.g. ''The Globe and Mail'', ''The Toronto Sun'', or ''Vancouver Sun'') – that's definitive: this is one of the clearest  fails I've ever come across. I do disagree with Bearcat about one thing though – the "significance" of Timmins' roles can be established by things like crediting: in that regard, Timmins' roles (one clear lead role, a main credited role on a second TV series, and a lead or near-lead role in a film) are objectively "significant". The problem is that the TV series and films ''themselves'' appear to be generally on the low side of notability, which means the actors in said roles get no coverage on their own. In any case, Bearcat and I do come to the same conclusion: Timmins is not currently notable enough for a standalone article. So the result should be delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passed  with significant roles in multiple notable TV series (Wingin' It and Ride (TV series)|Ride
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: An actor or actress does not get an automatic NACTOR pass just because "significant" roles are ''listed'' in the article — |reliable source coverage ''about'' the performer has to be present to |verify that the roles were actually as "significant" as claimed. But four of the five sources here are either blogs or press releases, not reliable source coverage — and while ''one'' of the references is a reliable source, if you're aiming for "passes NACTOR because her work exists" rather than "passes NACTOR because she won an Emmy or an Oscar or a Canadian Screen Award" then it takes ''more'' than just ''one'' reliable source to get there. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she can be sourced ''better'' than this, but what's present here right now is nowhere near enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)