Deletion of Greater Kolkata College of Engineering and Management

Comment: Well I might be wrong but "legitimate degree granting" isn't a criteria for notability according to .WP clearly says "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. '''Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.''' All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it". If you search on google news only one news article about the "shutting down due to student protest" pops up.I sincerely believe this article is non-notable.The copyvio issue is comprises >70 percent of the problem.The "campus" description is copy pasted from MIT, the library description from either MIT or Cambridge, the photos of college library are from Lund University,hostel from MIT Simmons hostel,Elektro builing from Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Even the principals are Edmund Phelps and Jack Steinberger who are noble prize winners and yet check with the sources and the info turns out to be false.Now, if you start deleting every copyvio only few paragraphs remain.I will say again that a college does not need an article just because it exists for "legitimate degree granting".Sorry I may seem harsh to your comments but I need to justify my nomination for AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I didn't take the comments as harsh.  They are a perfectly reasonable response based on policy guideline; exactly the sort of thing all editors discussing deletion should engage in.  I want to make it clear that there are two issues at play, of which only one needs a discussion at AFD.  The copyright issue is one that can be dealt with through editting, and doesn't require discussion at AFD.  In fact, I will go ahead and deal with it momentarily.  The key issue at hand of AFD is whether the article topic meets our inclusion guideline.  I understand that it does not meet .  However, we sometimes |ignore all rules.   is an essay, and not guideline or policy, but it does point out that degree granting institutions are routinely kept.  The reasoning is that they will have coverage in reliable sources (that may not be readily online) by their very nature, and as such should be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:IAR||WP:OUTCOMES)