Deletion of MyBB

Comment: No matter how popular something may be, being the subject of an article requires coverage by reliable third-party sources (#Notability). Such sources are not in evidence. The ones cited in the article are not by third parties and/or not reliable because they are |self-published (blogs, forums etc.), including the forum-software.org link given above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SPS)

Comment: MyBB Tim's lengthy comment is irrelevant, in ''gross violation'' of  and is |disruptive of this AfD. It should be removed, and this user should not be encouraged to further violate  by further participating here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:DE)

Comment: I haven't !voted here, but I think as long as an editor discloses their COI and avoids editing the article one can hardly call it disruption. It looks like he made a good faith effort to help us find sources, so I don't see what the problem is. I've seen disruptive COI editing a time or two, and this ain't it. He didn't even !vote Keep. If his comment is too long someone can just collapse it for readability. Also,  may be applicable here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: Ok, here is the problem: I am seeing around ''2.9 million hits'' for 'MyBB review' (over 40 million for just MyBB), and lots and LOTS of people talking about the software, just not in reliable source in the first few pages.  I'm seeing news hits but they are incidental (bug traq, etc.).  My gut feeling says this is notable and should be kept, but I just haven't found any wp:rs sources yet, will keep looking.  I might even be temped to say keep using  simply because so many people are talking about it, just in the 'wrong places
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)