Deletion of Wim Blom

Comment: Yeah it's a cut and paste of thishttp://www.iantangallery.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/W.Blom-cv.pdf, which is a CV put out by Ian Tan Gallery, where Blom is currently exhibiting.http://www.iantangallery.com/wim-blom-highly-anticipated-new-works/ This article was created by a  so it appears possible to be part of a PR campaign (we probably should look at other artists exhibited at Ian Tan to see if they also had Wikipedia article's created by SPAs). There is confirmation his work is in the Canadian galleryhttp://www.gallery.ca/en/see/collections/artist.php?iartistid=536 but he was an employee there, as a curator.. a serious COI for determining notability in this case. I am unable to confirm the other claim that his works are in the South African National Gallery. So it would not pass ARTIST 4.D. I searched on the awards and they all point back to Blom, as if the awards don't exist, which may be due to lack of online sources, but shows they are not notable. Not enough evidence of a notable artist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: I removed a Copyvio and added a couple of references, but these falls short of meeting the rather stringent  criteria. Much of the subject's career is pre-net though; if the National Gallery of Canada entry was more than just a bare-bones biography (e.g. works in their collection) that would probably pass, though their database entry may be more due to his curatorial role there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ARTIST)