Deletion of Sean Patrick Fannon

Comment: fails . I see at most one source which I think might count, and it's one of the book sources. None of the sources which have been added are helpful to determine notability. The article is basically a giant CV and may fail  regardless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Passes , albeit barely.  The https://www.wired.com/2017/05/geeks-guide-rifts/ Wired piece unequivocally passes as one of the two necessary sources (it's in-depth, secondary, independent, , and focused on him extensively.)  For the second, there's enough multiple independent sources to combine per ; the one paragraph in the https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/life/entertainment/story/2013/jul/29/after-40-years-popularity-tabletop-gaming-ri/114446/ Times Free Press, while short, is reasonably comprehensive and combines with the passing coverage of the 2017 ENnies nomination https://www.polygon.com/2017/7/5/15923872/best-tabletop-rpgs-2017 here, and the mention of him as a featured guest at ConCoction https://www.cleveland.com/comic-books/index.ssf/2014/05/cleveland_concoction_brings_sc.html here and at Magic City Con https://hooversun.com/peopleplaces/magic-city-con-to-fill-2-levels-of-wynfrey-hotel523/ here to illustrate minimum notability.  EDIT:  That said, assuming this is kept, the sources do need to be cleaned up a bit - some of the recently-added ones don't pass , and even aside from those there's too much use of  sources.  But those don't cancel out the usable ones, which are sufficient to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:RS||WP:BASIC||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Per uthor #3, someone is notable if they have created a well-known work or collective body of work. Per the listed bibliography the subject has created a significant body of work and qualifies as notable. The article could use additional citations and more work but should not be delted. Only improved. Working on adding those now. &#8213
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: unless reliable, independent sources can be furnished that devote significant coverage to this person as a person. The article now has a "Personal life" section that is entirely unreferenced. That is a violation our core content policy of |verifiability. If he has created notable games, then he can be mentioned in articles about those games. At this time, I see no evidence that this person is notable, as Wikipedia defines the term, but I am open to being convinced otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)