Deletion of Susannah Ticciati

Comment: for lack of evidence of passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: She has created a work that has been the subject of multiple independent reviews {{doi|10.1093/jts/flp042}}, {{doi|10.1353/sho.0.0200}}. Does this meet  criterion 3? The only reason it wouldn't is if we judge it not to be a "''significant''" work. But how do we judge significance, if not by the existence of multiple full-length reviews in independent reliable academic journals? Maybe a topic for Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) rather than here? Personally, I'm increasingly thinking that this specific criterion is in need of revision
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: To add to the above, there are 5 publications listed in WoS, but 0 overall citations. Her book ("Job and the disruption...") is held by ~125 institutions according to http://www.worldcat.org/title/job-and-the-disruption-of-identity-reading-beyond-barth/oclc/60322093&referer=brief_results WorldCat. Note that number of GS hits is irrelevant (as opposed to the citations of the hits, as xxan points out). It would appear that this case must be argued on #1 (as others are obvious non-starters), but the statistics do not support a conclusion of notability. Rather, they are extremely typical of a junior-level academic. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I am afraid that this otherwise notable academic may fall foul of the |verifiability issue in Wikipedia:ACADEMIC#General_notes: "''It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject''."  I'll post a rescue tag in the belief that I am mistaken
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Her work must be influential in her field.  Google Book search shows many other religious books mentioning here and her work.  She is also referenced in a lot of Google scholar results.    item 1. I believe she meets.  Read the explanation of "Notes to specific criteria:" and that seems to fit here rather well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as articulated by Xxanthippe above, there does not seem to be enough to pass the |professor test quite yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: GS cites are 7, 3, 1, 1. Totally inadequate for rof#C1, even for a low cited area as systematic theology. Far too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Does not meet , and although she is the author of a work that has received multiple independent reviews in reputable academic journals, (see my Comment above), this does not appear to be a ''significant'' work as required to meet : the journals in question are the specialist theology journals (''Journal of Theological Studies'' and ''Shofar: An International Journal of Jewish Studies''), there are no hits in GNews Archive indicating no reviews in non-academic journals or newspapers, and the few hits in GBooks are for specialist theology books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)