Deletion of Lindsay Mills

Comment: I don't really have a strong opinion on whether this should be a standalone entry or even a redirect, but I just took an admittedly  cut at removing trivia, redundancy and tone problems. So that might help. Or it might not be enough. I note we do not have a standalone entry Glenn Greenwald's partner David Miranda despite Miranda having taken a much more public role, between the highly publicized airport detention, his testifying before Brazilian legislature, and so forth. Mills appearing at one awards show is not that; she's basically a low-profile person except for who she's dating, and I'm somewhat inclined to say that for BLPs we should err on the side of, Wikipedia should not make someone into a public figure if they are not clearly one. In which case, a bit about their relationship on Snowden's page is clearly appropriate, but only insofar as it actually bears on an encyclopedic account of him and isn't pure tabloid fodder. I'm not sure what we have on her alone is encyclopedic rather than  or  (especially to the latter, the fact that it was filled out with so much trivia and even arguable BLP violations is to me a tell-tale sign we don't really have enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD||WP:NOT||WP:PSEUDOBIOGRAPHY)

Comment: as first choice, |relationships do not confer notability. If Lindsay Mills is going to be mentioned at all in Edward Snowden, which seems quite dubious to me (how is the name of Snowden's girlfriend of interest to Wikipedia's readers, if the name is all there is, mentioned in passing?), then redirect, I suppose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: there is a lot of coverage but it's all based on the fact that she's Snowden's partner.   and  apply.  A redirect is appropriate as it is a plausible search term
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:INHERIT)