Deletion of New Jersey Rockin Rollers

Comment: This is getting ridiculous. Nominator should have done . Professional teams are notable,  only applies to players, and pages were not all created by a single user
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: I remembered when the team was created at the peak of hype in roller hockey and it took me just a few minutes to expand the article with some of the dozens upon dozens of sources about the team available from ''The New York Times''. The team was active more than two decades ago and I'm sure that if I dug a bit deeper I'd be able to find, and add to the article, another couple of dozen sources. But just as easily as I found the sources, the nominator -- who seems to have prejudged the entire sport -- could have and would have found those same references. This is a complete and total failure by the nominator to meet the obligations of  and to make a legitimate effort to preserve encyclopedic content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: While I've generally been skeptical that many of these teams meet , the two ''most significant'' added cites from the ''NYT'' -- a single media outlet, to be sure, but a journal of record -- shows to me that this one is close enough to meeting GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Professional sports team meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: Blatant failure here of  by nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)