Deletion of Arsala Khan (suspected al Qaida financier)

Comment: no proof from neutral sources that this person even exists. If the person does exist, the article would need to be deleted and re-made under a different name because of  anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Both "keep" votes here (which are both from people with ties to the article) fail to acknowledge that ''the only information in the article is already contained in another article, and the '''only''' apparent reason someone could know of this guy is if they had already read that information''. (I am ignoring the additional information that was added in the past week about other people with the same name, since I feel sure anyone reasonable would agree that that information has no purpose and should be removed even if this article is kept.) The keep votes are arguing that this person is significant and therefore should have an article; I'm not arguing that he's insignificant, I'm arguing that there should be ''some'' known content worth putting into an article as a minimum criteria for the article to exist. (And, now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure just being mentioned in some military documents doesn't establish |notability, if no other sources ever reported or commented on the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)