Deletion of Apostolic Catholic Church (2nd nomination)

Comment: As a matter of policy, the situation is clear. #Notability provides that: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Those who support keeping the article have provided no such sources, even though the  of proof is on them. Instead, unrebutted analysis has shown that the sources currently known are not independent. Articles in Wikipedia must at all times be verifiable, that is, they must contain references to reliable sources that allow readers to independently verify the article's content. Because this article does not meet this core requirement even after a 7-day-AfD, it must be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BURDEN)

Comment: per the actual analysis of the sources provided above. Coverage must obviously be independent to prove notability. And, contrary to what has been said here, all churches are not inherently notable. Comments like "A church which seriously claims one million members, even if it really doesn't have that many, is clearly notable" or that we "cover any verifiable denomination" are outright wrong and against the consensus of the GNG and  and give away the weakness of the arguments made. Likewise, coverage that simply mentions the subject in a trivial context doesn't establish it as passing the GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)