Deletion of Paola Pivi

Comment: No evidence of notability at all. Curiously Vejvančický, the only person so far asking for "keep", uses straw man arguments by answering hypothetical reasons for deletion that have not been put forward. Nobody has claimed there is "harmful" or "commercial" information, nor has anyone suggested copyright infringement, so Vejvančický's arguments are irrelevant. As for "a notable and interesting artist", "notable" has not been demonstrated and "interesting" is irrelevant: see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: with significant coverage that demonstrates the subject meets the guidelines for the |general notability guidelines.  Also, criterion 4 from  is applicable as exhibiting twice at the Venice Biennial shows her work is receiving critical attention.  That's not some small gallery somewhere, it is a major arts exhibition
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)