Deletion of DiscInsert

Comment: on the basis that (a) the two cited sources are insufficient to ground a claim of "significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources", and (b) nothing in the article or the sources explains why this software is other than |run of the mill and deserving of encyclopaedic coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: A very borderline article, but I think the external links (some of them anyway) ''just'' manage to assert notability. Per Joe Chill, more or less.  thing had me for a bit, and  I get the feeling it has a very slightly promotional tone, but nothing too serious, or enough to !vote delete. Almost, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)