Deletion of Dołęga-Zaleski and Dołęga-Mycielski

Comment: The basic factual information in the articles, that the Dołęga-Zalescy and Dołęga-Mycielscy families were once Hrabia (Counts), is not disputed by the nominee. IMO, that means they were notable once, and notability is timeless.  I could also be slightly concerned if the nominee is on a personal mission to purge info from Wiki based on self-made notability criteria, for which (in my interpretation) there is no obvious http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poland/Archive_1#Notable_.3F_Polish_families consensus.  Earlier deletion discussions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Radwan_D%C4%85browski-%C5%BB%C4%85d%C5%82o_Family_(2nd_nomination) seem to have been based on genealogy concerns (difficult to say now, when the article is deleted), but I see no such issue here.  The articles are mere stubs, but this is not a valid reason for deletion - it could be a reason to demote the information to a List of Hrabia though.  The verifiability issue is not an acute or critical problem here - the Dołęga, the Mycielski and the Zaleski (http://www.heraldry.ws/html/zaleski-poland.html) (in various transliterations) - can be verified, so I would give them the benefit of doubt, if verifiable sources ''could be found'' for articles.  Online verifiability of families of old Counts is expectedly difficult, but a manual check at the Polish National Library should be a relatively simple task, and that would settle the issue once and for all. I'm personally frustrated with these notability discussions, which I consider inherently subjective. I'm probably leaning heavily on  in my support, and I may be a minority around here.  I would like to laud the nominee for an overt and transparent nomination, thanks for alerting me to the issue on my talk page. (added links
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)