Deletion of List of fictional characters missing an appendage

Comment: but rename to List of fictional amputees.  The motif of amputation in fiction is definitely a worthwhile topic, and such a list is comparable to the real-world List_of_amputees. I'd suggest that this list is well within Wikipedia norms, and can become encyclopedic with some editing: its main weakness, as previously noted, is the skew to SF/Fantasy, and its lack of sourcing. Its contents are neutral, verifiable, and its constituents notable. In certain cases, amputation is a core trait to the fictional character (e.g. Captain James Hook or Six Million Dollar Man). This article does ''not'' constitute an #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|Indiscriminate collection of Information; it's clear what the requirements for list membership. Further, it fulfills the suggestions of |Lists in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LISTV)

Comment: Lists are important enough to wikipedia to have their |own official guidelines.  This list should be kept because a) the content is notable and verifiable and b) it meets the guidelines as spelled out in .  Besides, WTF, regardless of how many random punctuation marks follows it, is not a valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:LIST)