Deletion of List of vaporware (2nd nomination)

Comment: As a list of "things that never existed" it is not, and can never be, encyclopedic content.  Even if confined to "things that reliable sources have called vapourware" a complete list would be "far too long to be of value", which per  is an indicator of an inappropriate topic for a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: but '''cleanup'''. For what should essentially be a |stand-alone list it's pretty wordy but most entries have their own articles. Get rid of the fluff and keep links to vaporware with articles, then it'll follow the usual guidelines.--Special:Contributions/70.80.234.196|70.80.234.196
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL)

Comment: as an unmaintainable list.  A few of these games would certainly pass  and  on an individual basis, but on the whole the list will always boil down to original research.  If a particular game is noted for being vaporware then it can be mentioned in that particular article, added to :Category:Vaporware and mentioned (again, only if it's particularly notable for such) in the Vaporware article.  As much as this list tries to meet criteria, it will always have the factor of opinion driving it, whether critical or not, making it |not verifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:V)