Deletion of Tericka Dye

Comment: Given that there are 3.5 million articles, there are likely a large number that have lingered for 4 years before being brought to AFD. I would love to see an age tabulation of article that have been deleted in the last year. Granted, new crappy articles are more likely to be spotted on "new article" or "recent changes" patrol. Longevity of an article in no way satisfies  or any other guideline I can think of for why an article belongs in an encyclopedia, and there is no rule at all against bringing a 4 year old article to AFD. Doesn't this article predate both  and OTNEWS, so when it was created all anyone would have looked at was "Is it in the newspapers?" which is no longer a sufficient excuse to keep an article about a person of dubious notability who is publicized for one thing she is seeking to put behind her
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Multiple press coverage.  Passes  and I can see this article being of use to someone researching the transition of people from the adult film industry into the "mainstream".  Some have done this and some have failed to make that transition.  In the end, we're an encyclopedia and I see this as valuable to that end
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The operative words in  would seem to be ''enduring notability'' in this case. This person's campaign to "re-integrate into the mainstream" has been going on for years now and is extremely well documented, i.e. in national news outlets on both the first and second occasions of firing and the lawsuit, in the pop media (Dr. Phil), etc. I agree with the point made above that such re-integration is a social phenomenon that is likely to be studied more seriously in the future, so this person's case is important precisely because it is so well documented. Lastly, perhaps the prolix off-topic chatter above should be collapsed. Respectfully
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Passes  easily. There is ample coverage dating back to 2006; she appeared on Dr. Phil as well. This passes  and  in that these ''are'' '''two separate events''' (note she did not get suspended in 2011) and that this incident is ''not'' routine news. Routine news is a teacher having sex with kids; this unfortunately happens way too often. But national coverage is received (and a spot on Conan, too!) in notable, non-routine cases like this. There is plainly no violation of NOTNEWS or BLP1E here. The reliable sources are many and they do not stop after one month. She is (marginally) notable for being an adult film actress as well, and if BLP1E should be further argued here, this must also be taken into consideration. There is no "one event" occurring here, it is a series of events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)