Deletion of Ceepeecee, British Columbia

Comment: According to BC Geographical Names, its status is "official"http://apps.gov.bc.ca/pub/bcgnws/, and it was populated. Just enough verifiable history to satisfy , IMO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Was formerly populated (e.g. I see a first aid station and a port in the sources, mention of Indian shacks and employee houses, as well as one source saying a population of 1,500 at the peak - but not sure if that the cannery or the area around the island) - so it would meet . Regardless, it also seems to meet GNG rifling through various gbook hits - https://books.google.co.il/books?id=7q2OXa0oGhgC&pg=PA100&dq=Ceepeecee&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ8qnp-PTeAhXhtIsKHUosAQ0Q6AEIPTAE#v=onepage&q=Ceepeecee&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=CXkIEt-gr1QC&pg=PA65&dq=Ceepeecee&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ8qnp-PTeAhXhtIsKHUosAQ0Q6AEIQzAF#v=onepage&q=Ceepeecee&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=pY9D2U7-a44C&pg=PA57&dq=Ceepeecee&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ8qnp-PTeAhXhtIsKHUosAQ0Q6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=Ceepeecee&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=OCUlDDBTU8sC&pg=PA79&dq=Ceepeecee&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ8qnp-PTeAhXhtIsKHUosAQ0Q6AEIMTAC#v=onepage&q=Ceepeecee&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)