Deletion of Roadside attraction

Comment: This was clearly an issue of sourcing not notability. #DICTIONARY doesn't apply as the concept goes beyond just the definition. The term is in wide use over several decades across at least two continents. There are even Wikipedia categories for roadside attractions (not an indicator of notability but does show just how common this term is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: meets , plenty of |useable citations available, article now has some, lots of books discuss subject, article lists some, here are a couple more https://www.worldcat.org/title/125-wacky-roadside-attractions/oclc/918969719&referer=brief_results ''125 Wacky Roadside Attractions'', https://www.worldcat.org/title/minnesota-marvels-roadside-attractions-in-the-land-of-lakes/oclc/46793170?referer=br&ht=edition ''Minnesota Marvels: Roadside Attractions in the Land of Lakes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: This article does need improvement, but it is about a real and |reliably sourceable concept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Passes . See https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&ei=-gHIWtrXOoW6sQXXv4bQAg&q=%22Roadside+attractions%22&oq=%22Roadside+attractions%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...4696.4696.0.4817.1.1.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.0.0....0.w6Y5DoE42ZQ for starters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)