Deletion of Infragistics

Comment: Easily meets  with the supplied sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)

Comment: As pointed out above in relation to notability, GNG states that a topic which "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" is deemed notable. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage (same as GNG) with in-depth information on the company (not just a brief description or mention) and (this next bit is really important!) containing "Independent Content". This is where NCORP clarifies what is required for coverage to be deemed "independent of the subject". As defined by , "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Looking at the sources in the article itself, most are mentions-in-passing that contain no information whatsoever on the company. For example, https://www.i-programmer.info/news/146-uiux/3220-new-sharepoint-web-parts.html Thehttps://www.i-programmer.info/news/89-net/3337-business-reporting-added-to-netadvantage.html four https://www.i-programmer.info/programming/theory/1298-quince.html articles https://www.i-programmer.info/news/146-uiux/5149-indigo-studio-freeui-prototying-tool.html from i-programmer.info contain no information on the company, all fail  and . Similarly, the articles from http://visualstudiomagazine.com/Blogs/Tool-Tracker/2011/02/Infragistics-Data-Visualization.aspx Visual Studio Magazine, http://reddevnews.com/articles/2010/04/15/component-makers-expand.aspx Redmond http://reddevnews.com/articles/2011/07/11/infragistics-charts-a-new-course-for-windows-phone.aspx Developer, https://www.drdobbs.com/windows/wfp-aspnet-and-silverlight-tools-announc/202801823 from Dr.Dobbs and http://virt2008east.sys-con.com/node/297795 for the 2008 Virtualization Conference and Expo all fail for the same reasons. The articles from https://sdtimes.com/infragistics/quince-pro-offers-interface-designs-as-a-service/ SD https://sdtimes.com/infragistics-improves-developer-productivity-and-user-experience/ Times, https://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/04/infragistics_silverlight/ The Register, https://adtmag.com/articles/2009/03/03/infragistics-new-tools-for-picturing-data-in-silverlight.aspx ADTMag, https://rcpmag.com/articles/2007/06/04/infragistics-working-on-silverlight-aspnet-35-controls.aspx RCP Mag and http://ns.gmnews.com/news/2010-10-28/Front_Page/Software_development_company_opens_new_facility.html Sentinel are based on company announcements and/or rely entirely on information provided by the company or connected sources, fail . Finally, the http://www.techie.techieindex.com/ug/ecommerce/vendors/description.jsp?id=117 inclusion in the "Ultimate e-Commerce Resource Portal" appears to be reliant entirely on information provided by the company - certainly there is no mention of an attributed independent author and the language is peppered with peacock terms which also reappear (e.g. https://www.salarylist.com/company/Infragistics-Salary.htm same company description) in other articles/places. All in all, I am unable to locate any articles that meet the criteria, therefore topic fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: on  discussion above. Seems to be a welcome refinement to . Don't want spam pushed in by passing a false veneer of meeting GNG. ORGCRIT requires deeper examination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:GNG)