Deletion of Shopwise

Comment: or '''Merge to parent article'''. |primary sources do not advance . There is no need to branch out a title using primary sources just to have a separate title
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:notability)

Comment: And yes, by all means a redirect can then be created.) The article has no independent sources at all, nor is there any evidence anywhere that this brand is notable independently of its parent company. There is no point in merging, as the bare facts of the brand's existence, its launch date, etc are already in the article about the parent company, and other than that the Shopwise article consists almost entirely of a table listing all it branches, which is excessive listing and not needed. (As Lenticel rightly said above, a violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: to Rustan's. The brand seems to be not notable enough to stand on its own. The article also looks like it violates 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)