Deletion of Agent (The Matrix) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Many sources see the agents as the franchise's version of men in black.  As that article does not cover this yet, there is clearly scope for improvement per our policy  which states that "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: as has reliable sources coverage including scholarly articles, therefore passes . The articles main topic may be different but still have significant coverage of this subject, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: article is severely lacking in sources in some places. Is Sparknotes even a reliable source? But there's clear sustained coverage here to meet the , and the article has clear . Would also accept a merge depending on how the article improves, now or later
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: meets , and withdrawn by nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The  arguments brought up only refer to the current state of the article. Did the nominator (or anyone else so far) actually do a  search? Because aside from the sources present in the article, a https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=agent+%22the+matrix%22+movie&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5 Google Scholar search alone already gives numerous sources, which provide both plot summary and analysis. Sure, some of that content is about Agent Smith specifically (the importance of that character is undoubted), but many also deal with the agents as a group. (If other individual agents may be "non-notable and forgettable" is not the major issue here, as the article is about the agents collectively
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I think I lokked into this a while ago. The issue is that the topic is likely notable, due to some scholarly sources analyzing the concept of the agent a stereotypical man-in-black government worker but our current article is pure  (in the form of pure plot summary) that is borderline a  territory. PS. Maybe {{u|Daranios}} could start a reception section, using sources they found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:TNT)