Deletion of Nucleonica

Comment: edit conflict Mark viking above and I don't have time to re-jig): Some concern  was not carried out on this and I was serious mulling if this was not a Frivolous or vexatious worthy of a .  Yes the article was lacking in citations and an an orphan seemingly through lack of some simply  and I am desirous of letting ion particles flow till the hair stands on end ... but fundamentally we have a reasonable subject especially as J Bloggs can probably access it if they like.  I'd respectfully oppose and suggestion of a merge to Karlsruhe Nuclide Chart (Acks to Headbomb for pointing out the linkage) as Nucleonica and the Karlsruhe Nuclide Chart are fundamentally different animals and the articles developed to different levels of maturity.  I am convinced better strategy is to let the Nucleonica article develop on its own to wherever it gets and then consider a merge ... and Nucleonica may then be the prime article into which Karlsruhe Nuclide Chart needs to be merged.  Otherwise Nucleonica would have to develop within Karlsruhe Nuclide Chart giving respect to  ... its an additional constraint and may particularly affect any images that may be added.  Thankyou
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SCLOSE||WP:COMPETENCY||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: WP:NEXIST could have been found with a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)