Deletion of Gary Concepcion (youth politician)

Comment: Nothing stated here passes  at all, so his only basis for inclusion would be if he could be shown to clear  on the sourcing, but the overwhelming majority of the references here are |primary sources that do not constitute support for notability at all. People do not get into Wikipedia by having staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers, or self-published campaign literature, or mentions in meeting minutes — |reliable sources means ''media coverage'', not just any document you can find that happens to have his name in it, but the only reference here that is actually a reliable source is a piece of purely local media coverage in a non-notable context. GNG is not automatically passed the moment a person has gotten their name into their local media once — if it were, we'd have to keep an article about every single person who was ever president of a church bake sale committee, and every single person who ever had a piece of human interest coverage written about them for having an unusual number of toes. Rather, GNG tests for the ''volume'', ''depth'', ''range'' and ''context'' of the coverage, and nothing here passes those tests at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: if we can't just speedy delete it. The subject fails  and there is only one non-primary source, more or less a "local boy does the right thing type article", and the "office" held is a youth position that clearly fails . Additionally the number of "own work" photos, including those of awards and certificates that only the subject would be in possession of, in the article damn near confirms it's an . Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:AUTOBIO)