Deletion of List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts

Comment: This list is a good complement to :category:pseudoscience, cf. .  AS  says, "Categories appear without annotations, so be careful of NPOV when creating or filling categories. Unless it is self-evident and uncontroversial that something belongs in a category, it should not be put into a category. A list might be a better option."  Thus, having this list allows a topic to be listed along with information about who said it is pseudoscientific and why.  And that, mis amigos, is what NPOV and VER are all about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CSL||WP:CG)

Comment: Having no references is not an article deletion criterion, nor are POV problems. Also, "objectivity" is not the overarching standard for content inclusion on Wikipedia (this term is even avoided on policy and guideline pages); '''|verifiability''' is. The standard for inclusion on this page is that members of the scientific community have labeled a field or concept as pseudoscientific. Whether a field of endeavor or concept has been labeled so is verifiable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)