Deletion of Manolita Saval

Comment: based on the news sources uncovered, Saval's very long career and large number of film roles since 1939, I'm convinced she will pass the  criteria, and therefore . It would help if the nominator would stop mocking other contributors here and graciously admitted they had made a mistake (we're all human
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: and continue improvementshttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manolita_Saval&action=historysubmit&diff=478189999&oldid=477895620 as  has been established and we do not expect extended, current world-wide coverage, nor English-only sources, for an actress who has her screen debut in Mexico in 1939. And I note that when nominated, this article DID include several quite decent sources. As improving the article format and sourcing have proven to be |addressable issues, perhaps the nominator might wish to withdraw his nomination. And a sidenote: in order to better serve our readers, we do need more articles on non-English actors and actresses, AND will always appreciate when the current ones are improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:ATD)

Comment: We need to be careful here: because she is Spanish, there may well be articles in Spanish which |we simply cannot find. Despite this, the obituary (which might not work for some people because the link is to a Google translation) on its own is not enough, as that is no more the |routine coverage. I would not expect as much as a English-language actress, but something more than what we have. My vote may change, depending on any new sources provided. She also does not have any articles on any other Wikipedias (except a poor one at the Portuguese Wikipedia). — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Her Reuters EFE obituary states that she starred in numerous Mexican films (http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmensual.prensa.com%2Fmensual%2Fcontenido%2F2001%2F08%2F23%2Fuhora_farandula.shtml), so it seems like she meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: as the subject passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The nominator lacks of , and, as admitted by himself, he doesn't know policies, so it's strongly recommended he would study them before further nominations. This subject has received significant coverage even in 1939 (http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GIREAAAAIBAJ&sjid=obIMAAAAIBAJ&pg=6637,1900198&dq=manolita-saval&hl=en ''La Opinion''), has multiple news hits and more than one thousand book sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)