Deletion of Masonic Temple (2nd nomination)

Comment: those sources identified in the previous AfD are pretty superficial and require some | original research to make assumptions of the meaning.  There is a significant difficulty given the absence of a clear definition, there are a number of potential meanings but no agreement as to which applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: There is clearly no consensus to delete this.  The rest is a matter of ordinary editing and, per , '''If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)