Deletion of Walajabad taluk

Comment: by no means istcruft (i.e. "a term some editors use to refer to indiscriminate or trivial lists."). A taluk should be notable per . Covers 80 villages, http://www.kanchi.tn.nic.in/wal_taluk.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L||WP:NGEO)

Comment: this article isn't inherently just a list; it's fundamentally about a taluk (an administrative division) and hence inherently notable per  as a legally-reconized place. Granted it could use some expansion to add some extra info about the taluk itself, but I don't see that as a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Listcruft is not a valid rationale for deletion, and the topic passes  as a populated, legally-recognized place by the Government of India: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/3303_PART_B_DCHB_KANCHEEPURAM.pdf Census of India 2011 – Tamil Nadu. Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India|The Registrar General & Census Commissioner. Government of India. p. 11, pp. 22–27, 40...(et al.)http://censusindia.gov.in/towns/tn_towns.pdf Aalphabetical list of towns and their population. The Registrar General & Census Commissioner. Government of India. Entry #668.. Furthermore, a list of villages is certainly not "listcruft". See , where it is explained how the encyclopedia functions in part as an almanac
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:FIVEPILLARS)