Deletion of Eliana Benador (2nd nomination)

Comment: article has sufficient independent reliable sources to meet , but should be expanded with additional independent sources such as interviews, to better meet BLP requirements. Grounds for deletion have not been established in accordance with established policy and guideline. There is room for ''slight'' rewriting to reduce any hint of POV, such as literally quoting opinionated sources. Benador Associates has additional coverage in http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Benador+Associates%22&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 several books. Eleana Benador also has http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Eleana+Benador%22&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 similar book coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Nominator appears likely to be a |single purpose account dealing only with this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: Nominator being a |single purpose account. No real indication of non-notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)