Deletion of Sara Bronin

Comment: member has satisfied three of the criteria  2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. 3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g., the IEEE). 7. The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. Special:Contributions/Rin1010|Rin1010
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: h-index of 17 should be sufficient to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: user Special:Contributions/Rin1010|Rin1010 is a sockpuppet of Special:Contributions/Jafrogg|Jafrogg and IP address Special:Contributions/67.221.75.52|67.221.75.52. This is a clear manipulation of Wikipedia rules and this article should be deleted. Sara is simply not notable. Sorry, fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Low h-index and a clutch of very minor architectural awards don't add up to a pass of  to me, despite holding a full professorship at a good university
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: membership in American Law Institute should satisfy  3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I believe |notability in this case needs to be based on the region/counties where the subject of the article resides or based and the available media there. What is important is the |reliability of the sources and |verifiability. She doesn't have to be covered in the "New York Times" and "India Times" to be considered notable. In addition, been a past ''President of the Connecticut Hispanic Bar Association'' and elected member of American Law Institute adds to her notability only that both are not enough to pass  #2 and #3.  is not a ground for deletion either, it only means that the page creator and any possible socks associated with them are not familiar with our policies and guideline and the best way of handling them is to keep them aware and notify them of possible violations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:COI)

Comment: Does not support (). Low hindex. Considering that Sara Bronin has been heavily edited by IPs from the same location at the University of Connecticut, it does not warrant inclusion in the English Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Quick inspection indicates a very problematic article: (1) created by a now-blocked SPA at same institution and heavily edited since then by anon IPs from same institution &ndash;  often clouds judgement of notability, (2) sources are almost entirely web ephemera or non-published documents (e.g. from her institution) &ndash; the only  seems to be her wedding announcement in NYT, (3) comments above vastly overstate the  c3 aspects e.g. while American Law Institute|ALI does seem to limit their number of members, it seems to be a dues-paying, membership-based working professional organization, with new members being nominated by already-members (like a country club) and I don't see that Bronin is a fellow or some such of this organization (note that the above comparison to National Academy of Sciences|NAS is way out of context), (4) the case for  c1 is also vastly overstated above &ndash; Bronin only has a few articles in mainstream law reviews and WoS shows citations of 11, 10, and 3 (h-index 3). All-in-all Dr. Bronin's accomplishments are in-line with a fairly young-in-career scholar. This might be a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:RS||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: While I am less sure about whether her academic credentials mean she passes or doesn't pass , since I am not an academic, I do see sources indicating she's a mover and shaker, particularly in Connecticut, notable with sources such as https://www.hypehartford.com/who-we-are/blog/hype-blog/2014/08/20/spotlight-on-sara-bronin this in-depth write up. She lives in and has helped restore a http://www.courant.com/features/home-garden/hc-93-elm-street-hartford-20141202-photo.html historic house which "won top honors in AIA Connecticut's Alice Washburn Awards for traditional Connecticut residential architecture". She is a major player in whether the city of Hartford -- a large-sized city in Connecticut and the state's capital, gets a http://wnpr.org/post/hartford-baseball-stadium-turns#stream/0 baseball stadium. Her photo is in http://www.ctnow.com/pictures/ctnow-pictures-the-10th-annual-summer-solstice-in-the-park-20150619-photogallery.html CTNow. Her article on the subject of solar rights was https://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BRONIN.pdf cited by 58. She is quoted as an authority regarding http://wwno.org/post/backing-power-grid-homemade-electricity energy policy and law. Essentially she straddles different worlds -- law, architecture, academia, public policy, energy, historic conservation, plus her husband might run for mayor, with enough references in my view to meet the , although the current article needs some work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)