Deletion of 1977 Design

Comment: Having notable businesses as clients does not confer notability. Also, self-admitted |conflict of interest in the creation of this article. --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I dont think anyone doubts the client list or the existence of your company.  The problem is that it does not meet the |notability guidelines of wikipedia. It's nothing personal, all articles are held to the same standards.  Also, as the owner of this company, it's not appropriate to be editing the article.  See the COI notice on your talk page for more information.  It's best to work with another edit who is not so closely connected to the company to make any edits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Not a speedy candidate (I have removed the tag); the clients list is an assertion of importance, though not evidence of notability.  There is some brief news coverage of this company, but nothing close to the significant, non-local coverage necessary to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: the sources are not from a "local coverage source", but rather an apparently notable magazine called Design Week. I agree that the article may have some problems with being written by someone from the company, but if you feel that it is bias or ad-like, then |go ahead and fix it, it's no reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)