Deletion of Integral City (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per  #1 it has been reviewed in World Future Review, Kosmos Journal, Futurist, Alternatives Journal, Canadian Journal of Urban Research, and EnlightenNext. These are all quality reliable sources indexed by EBSCOHost one of the largest library services making them available to schools and library collections. They are not "fringey/alt journals" or "thought walled garden", which are pejoratives not objective examinations of source reliability. The noms theory of "back scratching" is unsupported
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: A book with only 51 GS cites in a high-citation field does not rise to the level of notability required for the existence of an encyclopedia article regarding the book.  The reviews for the book appear mostly in fringey places like walled-garden futurist publications, not the kind of sources required per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRIND)