Deletion of Field Studies EP

Comment: The keep comment above is simply mistaken; the |relevant guideline states, "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  The point of the sentence quoted above is that it is "''officially released albums''" that "''may'' have sufficient notability to have individual articles," whereas "demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable."  In this case, ordinarily I would suggest redirecting to the band's article, but this EP contains songs by two bands, which I'll presume are notable because they both have articles.  I see practically no coverage in newspapers, except for http://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/HT/lib00190,1295B572260D2660.html this Sarasota Herald-Tribune article, and, of all things, http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wbj.pl%2Fevent-79067.html&sl=pl&tl=en this in the Warsaw Business Journal.  However, there seem to be enough of the typical online reviews to warrant an article, especially taking into account that there's no single logical target to redirect this article's title.  Others are probably better at judging the significance of online reviews, though, so I may reconsider
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)