Deletion of Claire Swire e-mail

Comment: as per nom. Fails . Wikipedia is an attempt at an authoritative encyclopedia (paper or not-paper, this is the primary fundamental point of wikipedia) - it is not a news report database and it is not Snopes.com.  1) This is NOT an significant internet meme unless you're using such a ridiculously broad notion of significant internet meme that covers every single chain letter, glurge story, cute kitty/puppy picture, and yes, silly workplace email messages that people forward 2) The first article link uses the phrase "There is '''perhaps''' no better known" as a way of beginning an article - this is a prose structure flourish, not reliable research. And knowledge about this incident appears to be highly UK-centric, to boot 3) Press coverage does ''not'' equal encyclopedic notability. Much content in news media, even well-known respected sources with international scope, are not suitable for an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: notable and widely reported so should be easily improved per . On the first page of Google results I found the Guardian and the BBC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)