Deletion of StrongVPN

Comment: as . With what's currently in the article a brief section on the parent companies article seems like a good solution
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Putting my reply here so it is clear it was posted after the relisting. {{ping|GenQuest}} I was only discussing the nominator after stating my relevant argument. And the article does not fail , you are reading my comment the wrong way. It is only 'just' mentioned in the academic source by ACM. In the Springer article, there is a paragraph about their logging policy. The reviews I mentioned earlier definitely provide SIGCOV (and all the other aspects required for the GNG). Please evaluate them yourself before voting delete. I am still voting keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article meets . It has significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)