Deletion of Larry Seidlin

Comment: There is enough material covering the subject to pass the |notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: This article meets the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29#Primary_criterion primary criteria for being a |notable person. You don't spread knowledge by deleting information
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There is enough material covering the subject to pass the |notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as satisfying the primary |notability criterion; the subject of the article has been the subject of multiple, independent, reliable, published works, namely Fox News, ABC, and the BBC just to name three of the references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Otherwise nonnotable judge who cried in front of the cameras in his 15 minutes in the spotlight, thereby getting trivial mention in articles about the case. Wikipdeia is not a tabloid newspaper. See , a proposed guide for news stories not always justifying articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)