Deletion of Pi (first 100000 digits)

Comment: Not an encyclopedia article by any stretch of the imagination. Anything worth discussing about the statistical distribution of digits, people attempting to memorize them, etc., can go in the actual article Pi. In fact, Pi#Modern_quest_for_more_digits already says that the 100,000 mark was achieved in 1961, and Pi#Memorizing_digits already mentions Akira Haraguchi, who also appears in Piphilology. Moreover, the introduction to Pi mentions the conjecture that it is a normal number, so the topic of the digit distribution is already present as well. Everything in Pi (first 100000 digits) either violates |policy or belongs somewhere else
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTREPOSITORY)

Comment: Pi is especially notable and there are many books about it and its digits.  Our Pi|main article is too large at over 150K and so there is naturally a family of related |spinoffs including whimsical topics like six nines in pi.  The page in question seems to be a reasonable appendix too and if people don't want to read it, they don't have to.  The nomination doesn't provide a satisfactory reason to delete – just the |argument to avoid of .  Our policies such as ;  and  indicate that deletion is not appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:ATA||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:ATD||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Classic 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: per all above, . Just as we don't include lyrics in a song article, this doesn't belong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTREPOSITORY)

Comment: or '''Speedy Delete''' as |G4.  Any speedy deletion criterion is also a valid reason for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: The small bits of sourced information added by Andrew Davidson can, and in some cases already is, covered on the main Pi article.  Even with those sources, this is not a reasonable  from the main topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: Besides G4, Wikipedia is |not a raw-data repository for non-encyclopedia calculations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:RAWDATA)

Comment: per  and , with no prejudice against creating an article on the digits of pi containing information on distribution etc as unearthed by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTREPOSITORY||WP:RAWDATA)