Deletion of Arizona boycott (2nd nomination)

Comment: as useful search term which breaks no policies. To address the 'delete' arguments above: 1. "putting two things together to make a new topic" is not an example of original research. It would be an example of synthesis if any conclusion was drawn which wasn't found in the original sources, but since this is just a list with no development of ideas at all, that clearly isn't the case. 2. I guess the  argument being made is that the list is "too specific". To me it seems that it is at a useful level of specificity. In addition  - as a guideline - may be overridden when it is useful to do so. 3. Not encyclopedic? See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:UNENCYC)