Deletion of Oscar Randolph Fladmark, Jr.

Comment: An editor has opined that "GNG trumps all other guidelines", which is not true. There is no policy which states that, and in fact the GNG guidelines themselves are only a (rebuttable) '''''presumption''''' of suitability as a stand-alone article. If an individual's only noteworthiness is as a soldier, I submit that they should meet  before qualifying as a stand-alone article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: per nom. Fails SOLDIER and GNG. Also, the article's creator has stated he is the man's son, unaware of  - see #Oscar Randolph Fladmark, Jr., which I initiated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:ANI)

Comment:  is so full of shit, most notable soldiers/sailors/airmen meet  before they meet  and are then held up to the latter standard rather than the former
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: regretfully as there seems to have been a lot of work put into this article by many editors. Although clearly a skilled pilot with a fine service record he doesn't seem to have received "significant coverage" in independent reliable sources. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per .  I think it's been fixed up enough to pass GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)