Deletion of S. Perera (Kurunegala Youth Cricket Club cricketer)

Comment: per Rainbow unicorn. This does ''not'' pass  which clearly says "In addition, standalone articles are required to meet the General Notability Guideline." The keep !votes here have not offered any ''policy''-based argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)

Comment: meets . NCRIC is an easy guideline to follow, and as anal as the FC/LA/T20 rule might appear, it is nonetheless a simple rule to establish which players need articles. Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it|If it ain't broke, don't fix it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: WP:CRIN is a guideline that suggests when a player is likely to be notable enough to have significant coverage. Part of the reason for blanket policies such as this, is that we don't always have access to local sources. Generally a first-class cricketer, even one who only played one match, will have received significant coverage in independent local sources. That said, this is clearly an extreme case. On the evidence we have access to online, the player does not meet |GNG, as there is no significant coverage, what we have is purely statistical
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)