Deletion of Amanda Rosenberg

Comment: Yikes -- if there was ever a  candidate, this is it.  There's ''nothing'' in this article demonstrating any notability at all, and it's dominated by her love life.  Since when did Wikipedia turn into E! Online? ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTABLOID)

Comment: It seems that the censors are succeding to keep the more remarkable material out of the article such as her influence on the downfall of glass, her ambition and some of her more controversial viewpoints, despite being extremely well sourced.    If that information is supressed (as it has been), then the sources that were written about those topics are irrelevant - hence reasons she would pass  are dismissed.  In that context, there is no reason this person would pass any of our notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: several sources suggest she meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)