Deletion of Meaning of life (in five pages)

Comment: the article's creator agrees that it's |original research. Also the copyright issue - the presumption has to be that the copyright is owned by the author's estate so it can't be published without permission (not that WP should publish it anyway). Politeness or not,  clearly applies - I only prodded it in the first place because there's no suitable speedy criterion available to mere mortals like me (I missed the probable copyvio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SNOW)

Comment: User meant well, but misinterpreted what Wikipedia is for. Delete per #ESSAY. Have http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Meaning_of_life_(in_five_pages)&diff=cur&oldid=prev left him a helpful message
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Pretty good essay, but not for Wikipedia. #ESSAY. And it's |Original research. And the big copyright mess too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: per  even if  doesn't apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COPYVIO)