Deletion of Rage (fictional virus)

Comment: Plot summary that violates #PLOT, no secondary sources to demonstrate ABILITY|notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: This article has its place, regardless of another submitter's flawed sense notability. There are http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fictional_viruses other articles on fictionsl viruses. I think the fact that other people have created articles around this theme and different viruses makes it notable in itself. Note that  is not really applicable against my argument, as there are a plurality of fictional virus articles and not just another single one - all created by different people. Also  is a '''''guideline''''', not official policy. Also note that the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Doctorfluffy submitter's primary goal is deletion, and not Editing. Furthermore, submitter's arguments go against , which '''is official policy'''. Taken all together, it is pretty clear that this article should be a '''Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:FICT||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: The parent articles - 28 Days/Weeks Later Characters, 28 Days Later, 28 Weeks Later and 28 Days Later: The Aftermath - have done nothing but spawn huge piles of in-universe fan|cruft of which this is yet another. |Wikipedia is not a fan site or a free web host. The writers are looking for Geocities, not Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:NOT)

Comment: fails , no sources given, no sourcing added during discussion, needs some sort of outside sources to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:FICT)