Deletion of Richard M Holmes

Comment: The article shows no independent  covering the subject, nor I can find ones. Happy to change !vote, as usual, if evidence of notability comes out
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: to IncaGold as a plausible search term. Otherwise, none of the content in the article is |verifiable, as MobyGames (or Softpedia, which I also came across in my search for something on him) are not |reliable sources
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Which notability guideline to look at? As a game designer, perhaps ? Have his works "won significant critical attention"? AFAICT, none of the games he is credited with on MobyGames qualify for this. Holmes does not appear to meet the  either (significant, independent coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG)

Comment: This smells of self-promotion.  I see primary sources and MobyGames links.  The MobyGames links are about as useful as IMDb (interpret that however you wish).  The bottom line is there isn't any non-trivial coverage from reliable '''third party''' publications here, thus the person is failing basic  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)