Deletion of Institute of Leadership and Management

Comment: I was surprised see this had been nominated as an AfD. The organisation is well known in the UK (or at the very least amongst educators, managers and leaders). They have significant involvement with accrediting centres and courses around management and leadership in the UK. There seem to be lots of findings of surveys run by ILM which have been picked up by the media. Given these factors, I had expected there might a lot more coverage of the organisation itself. There are lots of secondary sources, but I haven't managed to find a good review by an independent journalist, which the article would really benefit from. I also recognise that there are aspects of the text that appear to be written with a promotional tone but that can be fixed. I find that in terms of notability the subject of the article meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: We are here to decide on notability. Not having independent sources is not a reason for deletion and does not contravene  - this is not an article about a minor celebrity or band which is likely to attract fancruft. The organisation's official website is not automatically an unreliable source unless it makes outrageous claims, which this one clearly doesn't. Professional associations in major countries are usually considered to be notable. I can see no reason not to give this one the benefit of the doubt. Apart from anything else, it is part of the highly respected City & Guilds organisation and awards nationally recognised qualifications
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I am equally surprised that this has been nominated for deletion. The ILM is an accredited and recognised professional institution in the UK. It also meets . Independent sources can be found. The promotional write up can also be rectified. I see no valid reason to delete this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)