Deletion of Riq index

Comment: per . See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tori index and discussion of both of these articles at Talk:h-index
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The main claim to notability for this bibliometric is usage by the major databaseAstrophysics Data System. This database is undoubtedly a reliable secondary source, but at present, it is the only one. I've been unable to find a second source; an APS blog doesn't count as reliable for me. This may fall under ; not enough time has elapsed for notability to develop. This doesn't preclude the development of a bibliometrics section in the Astrophysics Data System article to discuss this and https://github.com/adsabs/adsabs-pages/blob/master/help/metricsdefs.md other metrics used at ADS. No prejudice to recreation when multiple in depth reliable sources become available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)