Deletion of Tesla Semi

Comment: This is not a short article, nor does it only rely on a product announcement. The WSJ article covering preorders (mentioned above) is a good example of that. It's clear that the paper didn't just rely on a Tesla press release but contacted preorder buyers and other companies of interest. This is not mere vaporware or product placement; preorders and interest by major shipping companies are present fact reported in secondary sources, not the sort of speculation or rumor that  concerns. An AfD is premature for something generating this much coverage, when there's valid reason to expect coverage to continue and provide lasting notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: meets , it's well sourced. not vaporware. 700k+ ghits, and coverage in major news media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this may be a case of  and or , but noting the number of readers of the page, rather than an all out delete, a '''redirect''' to the relevant section (bolstered with more |sources), looks more appropriate if this is not kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMOTION||WP:RS)

Comment: Yes, there's a burst of coverage based on a press conference. But all those news outlets ''considered this worthy of covering''. There's more than enough here to pass  ''and that is all that matters''. Things that don't exist, or things that might never exist, ''are still notable'' if they pass GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)