Deletion of The Dead Hate the Living!

Comment: TPH... we need to sharpen your goggle-foo.  It was not too difficult to find lengthy reviews at http://www.fatally-yours.com/horror-reviews/the-dead-hate-the-living/ Fatally Yours, http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-dead-hate-the-living-1999-movie-review/ Beyond Hollywod, http://www.twilightmag.de/reviews-full.php?id=DVD-DeadHatetheLiving Twilight Mag (German), http://www.horror.com.pl/filmy/recka.php?id=106 Horror Online (Polish),  http://www.cinefantastico.com/film.php?id=250 Cine Fantastico (Spanish), http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=5107 eFilm Critic, http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1507413/08112005/story.jhtml MTV, http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20021101&slug=biozombie01 Seattle Times, and quite a few others apart from all the lessor mentions. I accept that you did look... just perhaps not hard enough. "sofixit" is a nice demand, but that is not what AFD is for. Multiple decent sources exist that show notability through . That's enough for me to politely request you withdraw this nomination. Thank you.... (and yes, I'll try to add them myself if no one else bothers)... Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sufficient non-trivial coverage exists in reliable sources that discusses the film directly in detail, meeting the requirements of . Adding those sources to the article is a part of "normal editing" as described in . An article with sources that exists but are not added to the article is not a good candidate for AfD, rather it is a good candidate for expansion and improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BEFORE)