Deletion of Roy Moore sexual abuse allegations

Comment: and '''move''' to "Roy Moore sexual misconduct allegations", since the allegations here range from dating teenagers and serving them alcohol to sexual assault, which are arguably not as severe as the allegations leveled against Harvey Weinstein, and more along the lines of Bill Clinton or Donald Trump's allegations articles. I'm worried this doesn't comply with  because it includes lots of the names of living people. Nevertheless, this is a useful article so the Roy Moore article doesn't get bogged down in the details of the scandal. If, for some reason, this doesn't have a lasting effect, it could always be merged back into Moore's article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPNAME)

Comment: as  festival of problems. Much as I loathe the man, and highly suspect the allegations to be well-founded, we can wait until the matter is settled before we make a big deal out of it. At any rate the level of detail is newspaper-level, not encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Per Drmies and the TheGracefulSlick. Not only are these unproven allegations against a  subject, but this article either disregards or violates , , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:LASTING||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Unneccessary |content fork. |Wikipedia is not news and it appears a few editors here have fallen victim to a bad case of |recentism. At this point, this ''is'' a BLP disaster fueled by speculation. I am baffled that |lasting impact can supposedly be determined when the story is ongoing and a |crystal ball hasn't been brought here for us all to see any future repercussions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RECENTISM||WP:LASTING||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: Obviously notable, obviously of lasting significance, huge amount of coverage, utterly not a "sensational" story, obviously not a "BLP disaster". Also I would remind MelanieN that  applies to the women who have stepped forwards also
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: I personally wish that we would not have these types of detail-laden articles per  and , but since this is :Category:Sexual_misconduct_allegations|the norm that has been embraced by the Wikipedia community for years, it would be very strange to delete this article. The subject has been covered internationally for ten days with no signs of diminishing. It's obviously notable, and it's too complex to adequately cover in Roy Moore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:NOTSCANDAL)

Comment: As a content fork, this |makes a lot of sense, just like with Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, etc. There is simply too much information here for it to be contained in the main article; it was taking up an inordinate amount of space, and splitting is how we deal with that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)