Deletion of Kekkei genkai

Comment: the problem is that it lacks #Secondary information|secondary information. Having an article on Sharingan perhaps isn't a bad idea but a good fiction-related article needs both in-universe and out-of-universe information to warrant a page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: it's really of no use to keep the article if secondary sources don't exist. The ''Naruto'' databooks probably aren't |reliable sources since they're mainly exclusive to Japan. Any databooks released in the U.S. are scanlations far as I know
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELY)

Comment: as there is no |evidence of |notability to justify this #PLOT|plot summary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FICT||WP:NOT)

Comment: not a notable concept with no secondary sources. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: The very large number of ghits indicates it gets talked about a lot (and so is notable in the non-technical sense), which means it is likely that reliable secondary sources likely exist (to establish that it's notable in the |technical sense). Tag it for cleanup and give the editors who know the subject the chance to find the references FIRST, then bring it back for AfD after a suitable time. (As an aside, the number of ghits suggests that there are those who don't come across the term and would want to be able to look it up, but  is a depreciated argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:USEFUL)