Deletion of 300 East 57th Street

Comment: because of adequate coverage of the buildings themselves (as opposed to the buildings' occupants) in reliable sources. (Despite that, these articles are still painfully thin on details, and need improvement.) For 45 Christopher Street, citations aren't strongly indicative of notability for the building, except maybe with regard to 1934 explosion. (Sort of in the spirit of , it would seem that the more important topic would be the explosion, not the building.) Therefore, for that article, '''delete'''.Additionally, if these buildings have names (other than their addresses), it might be worthwhile to rename the articles (unless demonstrably better-known by address
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: found plenty of sources for each building, see: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&source=hp&q=15+Central+Park+West&cf=all&channel=s, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=45+Christopher+Street&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=880+Fifth+Avenue&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=810+Fifth+Avenue&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a. So im going for a  keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Presumably you found these due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/930 Fifth Avenue.  Mass nominations are almost always a bad idea, unless you can demonstrate that each individual entry fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)