Deletion of Reality Winner

Comment: WP:BLP1E and  are the overwhelmingly authoritative community rules on this. Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning did much more to become lastingly notable than Winner, and have had and this notability continue due to their world image of being whistleblowers (Snowden even frequently does interviews about his views on different privacy issues till this day). I must therefore agree with the opener of this discussion. Special:Contributions/77.66.12.7|77.66.12.7
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Passes  and , specifically point two of . The notability of this case is on par with historical cases such as Robert Lee Johnson (spy)|Robert Lee Johnson and Christopher John Boyce as well as more contemporary cases such as Snowden
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:PERP)

Comment: per other arguments above in favor of keeping the article. Also, for crime perpetrators, Wikipedia:Notability (people)#CRIM|'s criterion #2 says: "The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role."  does advise caution wrt articles about alleged perpetrators not ''convicted'' of a crime, but George Zimmerman has an article even though he was acquitted, and his crime was much more "mainstream" compared to Winner's - who I think meets the "motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual" criterion of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per Geo Swan. This is a clearly developing story that could reach the notability level of Snowden and Manning. It's much too early to nominate this for deletion. Alternatively, ''if'' the consensus is that this is a case of , then rename the article to "Arrest of Reality Winner" or "2017 NSA leak" and make it about the event, not a BLP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Necessary and relevant content can be used in other related articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Major new sites including nytimes, washingtonpost, independent, bbc, guardian, cnn have carried news on this, it doesn't fall under  per-se cause it has developed into something bigger including her being charged by the NSA..This will develop further
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)