Deletion of 2016 Sweden asylum center stabbing

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The is patently NOT a .   is a guideline that does not apply to this article,  It states "Wikipedia does have many encyclopedia articles on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be updated with recently verified information."   This article passes  because of the worldwide scope and depth of coverage and because of the impact of the event on the current dominating topic in Swedish politics.  That said, it needs expansion.   It is more productive to help expand articles on obviousl notable events than to delete them.  Here is a little https://www.google.com/search?q=Molndal+++stabbing&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=Molndal+++stabbing&tbm=nws&tbs=sbd:1 of the material that can and should be added to this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article doesn't meet . As tragic as it is, there's no evidence that there's any lasting effects or significant coverage beyond the usual sensationalist coverage of a spectacular murder. NEWSEVENT is pretty clear that media's criteria for publishing is different from Wikipedia's notability criteria which means that an event can receive a lot of media coverage without being notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEWSEVENT)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS and  apply. Most of the article is about a crime and the immediate responses. If indeed it leads to policy changes etc. it can be recreated. Insofar as it is related to the immigration debate, it should be present in that article, summarized and in context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: seriously.  is still policy, and relevant for this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)