Deletion of Anti-globalization and antisemitism (5th nomination)

Comment: Per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:SYN)

Comment: Before (in the second nom), I voted "weak keep," but this article has become stronger in the interim. I still see no serious POV problems (and if there are any, point them out please so that they can be fixed). As for , this is not an opinion piece. It is to some extent an article ''about'' opinions, but it is about ''notable'' opinions. Some of the weasel words are gone now. It was okay before, as evidenced by the consensus in the 3rd nom, and so it's certainly okay now. Incidentally, I'm not part of any cabal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: It Violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Notable topic and has |reliable sources. Anti-globalization could better defined within the article. It meets  and  . Also, I  am no cabal member
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: This is a perfectly legitimate topic, it's been well documented by scholars and and this article easily meets , , and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NOR||WP:RS)