Deletion of Alternative Cars Limited (New Zealand)

Comment: as having insufficient coverage in . If  sources are added, feel free to ping my talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: on the basis that it is close enough to notability to be worth keeping. Okay that's a weak argument I know, so let's call this an |IAR play. New Zealand is one of the smallest English speaking nations and therefore New Zealand based corporations will have significantly less coverage in comparison to a US or UK corporation of similar proportionate scale within the economy. Within the context of the size of the New Zealand print media that we use to seek out references I feel this passes the threshold and should be kept. If there were nation based Wikipedia's this would pass the text for nz.wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: 1) Since the consensus here is to delete has otability (vehicles) been considered? (2) If articles in independent magazines published in three different countries and at least one is recognized in its field, plus a book are not reliable sources then what are (because to meet the Notability criteria for vehicles, I needed to establish the types existence and validity)?  (3) If the article is to be deleted can it be returned to user space instead
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)