Deletion of Extendar

Comment: Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it.  The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  |Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.  Note, am now copying this to several AFD, which are the same, nominated by the same person, with the same invalid argument about mindlessly following the guidelines passed by deletionists campers as an excuse to get rid of things they personally don't like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: almost , as following  and , when a merge and redirect location exists we do that instead of redlinking.  We can plain see that this notable character is something we can actually http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&safe=off&gbv=2&tbs=isch%3A1&sa=1&q=Extendar+%22Masters+of+the+Universe%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi=&start=0 hold in the real world.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PERNOM||WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Consists entirely of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)