Deletion of Resort (talker)

Comment: per the http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Resort%22%20%22Foxson%22 lack &mdash; with the search term: ''"Resort" "Foxson"'' (Adam J. Foxson is one of Resort's creators) &mdash; of |reliable sources in Google Books. The links in the article are mostly unreliable sources, none of which establish notability. h2g2, which produces user-generated content, is not a reliable source. Resort (talker) fails Wikipedia:Notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: With respect to the BBC/h2g2 and MUD Connector sources, and given their usage by other sources,  states: "How accepted, high-quality reliable sources use a given source provides evidence, positive or negative, for its reliability and reputation. The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence." As the sources in question are widely used by both print publications and mainstream media, as shown in the above comments, I'd put forth that these sources have a claim to reliability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: BBC/h2g2 is not a Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H2g2. BBC/h2g2 guides may not be submitted anonymously. BBC/h2g2 guides may not even be edited, outside of a formal update system. BBC/h2g2 guides are '''peer-reviewed''' and '''fact-checked'''. BBC/h2g2 guides are edited by editors. BBC/h2g2 ''guides come under the scrutiny of the BBC in-house editorial team'', who are BBC employees. Indeed, Wikipedia's own article on h2g2 states "most are correct and well-written treatment of their subject matter by virtue of the Peer Review process". The author of the guide in question is not only a BBC/h2g2 researcher, he's also a BBC/h2g2 Guru and Sub-Editor, since 2002. The identify of the author of the guide http://uk.linkedin.com/in/richdaley, an IBM Manager and Lead Engineer, is well-known. Wikipedia  states "peer-reviewed publications are highly valued and usually the most reliable sources," "professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts," and "The most reliable sources are usually peer-reviewed". All three of these statements describe BBC/h2g2
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)