Deletion of Errol Sawyer (4th nomination)

Comment: Why is this even an argument? The fact that it was AfD'd 3X before is not a good policy-based argument and thus should be ignored. However, the fact that he has his work in multiple museums is ''clearly'' enough to pass . And as always we don't delete an article because sources haven't been added yet, only if they do not exist. Which as you can see from multiple comments above mine, that there are plenty of sources, and reliable sources proving that his works are in multiple museums. If we are basing this AfD purely on policy, then the only option is to keep it. Regardless of history, or editors who clearly do not get along
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: This article shouldn't exist now: we should instead be discussing the need for it at . But if we were discussing it there, I'd argue for undeleting and improving. He's a photographer of some note, and sources exist to back up this claim
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELREV)