Deletion of United states senate elections, 2014

Comment: United States senator terms are ''six'' years long, and there are multiple articles which set precedent for creating articles for future elections. Anything beyond this is too early (at this current time, of course), but I see no reason to delete a perfectly reasonable and encyclopedic article which would be shortly recreated anyway. As usual, content in these articles may be imperfect and |crystal balliness should be avoided, but that doesn't warrant deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: While a case can certainly be made for keeping the 2012 article (and indeed has on 2 previous AFDs), this one is simply too far ahead. All this article consists of is rehashing information available elsewhere -- basically, who got elected in 2008 or was in office, and a load of unsourced speculation. There's no way to know at this early stage who listed here will be running again in 2014; given the law of averages a few of these folks may not even be alive, or may have retired, by then. Obviously this should be recreated when there is substantive, sourced information available, but that won't be for a couple of years yet, at the very least.  does not always apply when an article is on a guaranteed event, but it does apply when the event has absolutely no information beyond speculation which enters into other areas such as  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per , this election will be almost entriely dependent on the results of the preceding election which is yet to happen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)