Deletion of 25 (Adele album)

Comment: per . The guidance in  to only create articles when there is a confirmed title, tracklist, and release data is extremely sound guidance. Passing the  is ''not'' an assurance that there should be a separate article, only the bare minimum threshold to be crossed in order to permit one. Our experience with premature album articles demonstrates exactly how unwise it is to have these articles.&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NALBUMS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Coverage is not significant enough at this time. Any progress on a planned album that has not yet been announced can be discussed at Adele's article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: WP:CRYSTAL addresses the issue of |unverifiable speculation, which the topic of this article is not{{mdash}}a significant number of |reliable sources agree that that Adele will release a new album this year and that it will in all liklihood be called "''25''". We, as editors, are permitted to record that according to |policy: "predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included..." Turning to . "In a few special cases, an unreleased album may qualify for an article if there is sufficient verifiable and properly referenced information about it—for example, Guns 'n Roses' 2008 album ''Chinese Democracy'' had an article as early as 2004. However, this only applies to a very small number of exceptionally high-profile projects ..." ''25'' is such a project, given the feverish level of interest in the topic from sources far and wide
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:NALBUMS)