Deletion of Danny Choo

Comment: per the nomination. No reasonable adduction of notability as evidenced by the trivial references above made by DOSGuy, which (imho) demonstrate clear failure of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Calling his "the most popular blog in Asia" represents a grossly Anglocentric view of the world. The article is written primarily based on self-published sources, and the independent sources cited do not rise to the level of "non-trivial coverage" --- whether or not the Star Wars blog, Akihabara News, etc. counts as , they're less than five lines long
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Needs more explain why it is notable, it currently only just passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article is completely sourced by blogs, youtube, and Danny Choo himself. Those are hardly resounding endorsements and clearly not |reliable sources. Thus, he fails . The assertion that the article is sourced from StarWars.com is misleading. It comes from a blog. Not quite the same. That's like sourcing a user's blog from ESPN.com and calling it legitimate because it came from ESPN.com
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)