Deletion of Sidewalk cafe

Comment: Neither the original reason for nomination claiming that it is a common vocabulary term or the unsubstantiated claim that it adds no value to Wikipedia etc. seem valid. The additional comment by the nominator claiming that "Sidewalk cafe" is a combination of two common vocabulary words to create an unambiguous, self-explanatory term also does not seem to be a valid reason for deletion. Sidewalk cafe is used as an independent subject in official documents like the https://books.google.com/books?id=XshcoFjozNUC&q=%22sidewalk+cafe%22&dq=%22sidewalk+cafe%22&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij0eSqk9rkAhWIA2MBHUJQALgQ6AEIUTAF New York City Charter and Administrative Code and other similar documents. I'm not sure that  was properly done. A quick search reveals that it has also received in depth coverage by multiple reliable sources like for example https://books.google.com/books?id=fM7a-OBysYcC&pg=PA454&dq=%22sidewalk+cafe%22&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij0eSqk9rkAhWIA2MBHUJQALgQ6AEIaDAI#v=onepage&q=%22sidewalk%20cafe%22&f=false this book or https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/8/19/20812235/sidewalk-cafes-sidewalk-space-noise-complaints-citations this article by the Chicago Suntimes, https://streetsillustrated.seattle.gov/urban-design/public-space/sidewalk-cafes/ Seattle's government, or https://austintexas.gov/sidewalkcafe The city of Austin, etc... Since the article does not violate  I see no reason to justify deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ISNOT)

Comment: Well I probably agree that Pavement cafe is worthy of an article, even if it has been named Sidewalk cafe without marking the article's proper name ... seriously, this is an important type of cafe, and richly documented in |reliable sources, which is what counts. I've added a mention of France and Italy, cited to ''The Guardian''; the article is absurdly New York-topheavy, and needs internationalising, but it doesn't need deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: No case to answer per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:BELONG)