Deletion of Ellen Burnes

Comment: There are other criteria in play than NPOL, but her citation record is not strong enough for #C1 and there seems no other claim to academic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being as yet non-winning candidates in political party primaries — to pass , she will have to ''win'' the ''general'' election next November, and to get an article any earlier than that it would be necessary to demonstrate that she already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten her an article on those grounds anyway. But there's literally nothing here that clears that bar at all: this is written like the bog-standard campaign brochure that even NPOL-passing officeholders are still not allowed to have, not like a properly written encyclopedia article, and it's referenced far too heavily to |primary sources that are not support for notability and not nearly enough to the |reliable kind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)