Deletion of Noron theory

Comment: a |neologism and non-notable |fringe theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: who may not be aware of how this works: This is '''not''' a poll, it is a discussion. Arguments with a solid basis in Wikipedia policies are given greater weight. Most relevant here would seem to be the policies on |fringe science and |notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:N)

Comment: Article originator is , and the sole book source IDed above is reported by Google Books to be sourced entirely from Wikipedia http://books.google.com/books?id=G62QSQAACAAJ&dq=Time+Travel:Trireme&hl=en&ei=4yZJTZa4BYH6vwP9vb0E&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA.  , , and not even notable fringe
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:OR||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: with hopes that the particularly obvious sockpuppets and/or meatpuppets involved will be thoroughly investigated. Non-notable, nonsensical |fringe theory without any basis or notice anywhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (:WP:FRINGE)