Deletion of Errol Povah

Comment: without prejudice against recreation of a '''redirect''' afterward — but delete the article first and ''then'' create a redirect if desired, because we have no need to retain the edit history ''behind'' the redirect. None of this is "inherently" notable for the purposes of establishing that he's eligible for a Wikipedia article — but the sourcing consists of one glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article about something else and a letter to the editor which he ''wrote'', which is nowhere close to enough sourcing to get him over 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as previously done per -R. Apparently, the creator does not understand that  is a valid edit when notability is a concern. I agree with Mifter that there is no significant coverage of this individual to be found to establish their notability per ,  or  (I can find a couple of RS mentions in passing but not nearly enough. Regards
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: to Airspace Action on Smoking and Health, then protect the redirect from further disruptive editing. Searches show they fail 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)