Deletion of Rashid Khalidi bibliography

Comment: This seems like a textbook #PAPER situation to me. If he's notable enough to have a standalone article (and he is), then information like this is of potential value to someone interested in his work. Due to the length, it makes sense to break it out into a separate list like this, rather than leaving it within his main article. When I hear that we don't have full bibliographies for most writers, that just makes me think that we need more bibliography articles, not fewer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)