Deletion of Mico32

Comment: being non-notable product that doesn't meet the notability requirements in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Can be considered a corporate product.  As someone with electrical engineering background, I recognize what this product is.  Its some company's implementation of the Harvard architecture, and it fails  for reliable sources verifying it.  Furthurmore, things like this come out all the time, and there's a mess of companies.  We need substantial proof of a company's particular product's 'notability' to warrent an article on it, and there's already articles on FPGA, Harvard architecture, and microcontroller of which microcontroller could be expanded to mention "soft" ones if proper sources can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)