Deletion of Adena Jacobs

Comment: Meets . Source examples include: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/theatre/theatre-director-adena-jacobs-takes-on-greek-tragedies-antigone-and-the-bacchae-20150805-gisg82.html, http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/theatre/girls-gone-wild-adena-jacobs-injects-modern-sensibility-into-greek-tragedy-the-bacchae-20151005-gk1bu7.html, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/review/belvoirs-new-directors-adena-jacobs-and-annelouise-sarks-join-forces/news-story/a375143e11ccbcc6c3d4dadba09095b5?nk=a5aeca1aa955d728e920db11161d72e9-1502321579, https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/2017/06/10/theatre-director-adena-jacobs/14970168004745, http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/theatre/oedipus-rex-review-suffering-laid-bare-in-adena-jacobs-take-on-myth-20140824-107r8k.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Seems to be more than sufficient  to support .  Not sure what  was done.  (Is the second speedy on the article appropriate while this AfD is running
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The ''Sydney Morning Herald'' article is both  in-depth and non-trivial. I recommend that the nominator try to do a better job with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I've added a couple of references, by no means exhaustive. Don't know how nominator could have googled her and thought the results trivial. For example, she's been profiled in the ''Sydney Morning Herald'' and ''The Saturday Paper'', which alone is more than enough for . I'd argue she passes  too based on her works although they aren't really referenced in the article (but are reviewed all over the place in independent, credible Australian sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)