Deletion of Ilaria Ramelli

Comment: Regardless of any paid interests (or not), if the article is completely rewritten to be  by unpaid Wikipedia editors instead of sounding like a flashy Curriculum vitae, it would be worth keeping due to the subject's academic qualifications
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Seems to be an industry heavyweight, where the industry is academia. Pass ,  and . A solid long term cleanup effort is needed to bring the article up to standard. It is certainly highly promotional and beyond the pale. It is worth remembering that "Swister Twister" who was certainly a sockpuppet also did a tremendous amount of excellent work. I don't see any evidence that the article IP editors are all paid. Some perhaps but not all. I suspect if was fully paid up gig, it would have been a single editor. Hard to tell though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIO)

Comment: the article (as the subject meets ) but delete the content and start from scratch. A few days ago, this article was in a https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ilaria_Ramelli&oldid=889233323 horrendous state, and while some of the worst content has been removed, it really needs to be rewritten in its entirety
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)