Deletion of City Calm Down

Comment: per duffbeerforme; coverage in reliable sources (e.g., http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/music/city-calm-down-record-delayed-by-drummer-20160118-gm8q1u.html, http://rollingstoneaus.com/music/post/city-calm-down-in-a-restless-house-video-premiere/4513, http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-radar/new-music-of-the-day-city-calm-down-son-nme-premiere-15175, https://consequenceofsound.net/2015/08/city-calm-down-shares-new-song-wandering-listen/, https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/the-calm-and-the-restless-ng-ya-132254?r=1, http://themusic.com.au/music/albumreviews/2015/11/02/city-calm-down-in-a-restless-house-jonty-czuchwicki/). These (along with the top 25 chart placement) are sufficient in my view to meet  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND)

Comment: Album charted at #25 in Australia. It doesn't matter if it didn't sell a single copy the following week, they meet  comfortably because having a charting album is a core qualifier. This is one of a number of recent AFD nominations that seems to be forgetting that AFD is for judging notability based on established policy, not personal criteria that work outside of that, like how far an album fell in the second week
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: satisfies the requirements of . I think that this is on a completely different level to the example cited by ShelbyMarion above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)