Deletion of The Sun The Moon The Stars

Comment: I don't see anything at  that suggests 622,921th in Amazon's sales ranking makes them notable. It mentions (#4) that a band is usually notable if they have a chart success in a national chart but that would be a top 30, top 40, top 100 sales position depending on the chart. I've formatted your comments too to make them stand out better
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: The band is also ranked on Amazon's National Music charts at #622,921 paid in albums, out of over 5 million releases, putting them in the top 20% and satisfying .  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/69.160.236.22|69.160.236.22
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: Amazon sales ranking definitely doesn't prove notability. But, the AltPress citation absolutely does. Jinkinson should have paid more attention to the diversity of the references listed on the page before posting his comment. Jinkinson claimed "the references all seem minor - blogs, fanzines, retailers", but at closer look there certainly are notable citations regarding the physical and digital distribution/release of their records from Punknews.org (one of the biggest punk news sites) as well as the Alternative Press, the largest alternative music publication in North America. The very first criteria listed under  "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources..." has clearly been satisfied. The source is reliable, not self-published by the band, and completely independent from the band. And no, I don't think AltPress would publish anything from a pub band, that's a no-brainer.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/68.199.62.63|68.199.62.63
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)