Deletion of British Airways flight 2157

Comment: No fatalities, no hull loss,  also seems to apply. A mention at BA or the airport article is the most it merits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Despite the well written prose, WP doesn't report on all emergency landings (). The investigation findings are not so remarkable either that it warrants inclusion in WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I don't see sufficient sourcing to identify this as an independently notable incident and therefore justifying its own article - aside from the AIBB reports, there are only the contemporary news reports and a self-published website. Not enough to substanstiate the requirements of general notability (bearing in mind also ) Secondly I don't think the previously developed consensus on what is required for a separate article (the WP:Aircrash guideline) is met - the recommendation of the investigation is essentially "think about these ways of organizing your maintenance procedures so it doesn't happen again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)