Deletion of Grange P-12 College

Comment: Written up in a journal, no question of its legitimate existence.  PR issues can be fixed, better sourcing is available.  It's not like this school is in Africa, China or India, where decent sources are not available.  So keep per /AG#N|guidelines,  and the longstanding consensus at OOLOUTCOMES
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCH||WP:ORG||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: to Hoppers_Crossing,_Victoria#Education There was a break from previous consensus regarding notability of schools in February.  Where the relevant point would be that secondary schools are no longer presumed to be notable simply because they exist.   (See {{oldid2|767023947|RfC_on_secondary_school_notability|February 2017 RFC}} for more) Regarding sources - of the four in the current article three were written prior to the schools creation in 1993.  Those may be reliable sources but they aren't coverage of the school.  The other source is a report prepared for the school. Perhaps reliable. It's not evidence of notability when someone produces a report you've requested. Currently no independent coverage by reliable sources.  Given the current sources and the little found in searching for more this school fails both GNG and .  Happy to reconsider if better sources are found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Regarding the above comment, the RfC last February said no such thing.  The ONLY thing it said is that SCHOOLOUTCOMES cannot be used as the sole argument to keep in a deletion discussion.  That's all.  , which is part and parcel of ORG, states that meeting GNG is enough.  It's a fair assumption that any school in a city of 150,000 is going to meet GNG, given enough digging. Your acknowledgement that there is enough to merit a redirect, IMO is tantamount to saying there is enough to keep.  However, I do acknowledge that the journal source is a bit of a ruse, so I've struck part of my vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL)

Comment: If your concern is , edit to remove the promotional aspects of the article per -CONTENT. This is only a -REASON when the article is "without any relevant or encyclopedic content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:DEL||WP:DEL)