Deletion of Christos Trikalinos (2nd nomination)

Comment: meets neither  (lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources) nor  (1 paper does not make an academic career
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: I've been watching the article and the debate from the start and I'm in agreement with David Eppstein.  From : ''trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.''  All of the sources given are quotes from Trikalinos.  Not one independent of the subject gives any information beyond his name and title.  Furthermore, being the head of a union of scholars is not the same as being a member of a major academic body, so I don't think he qualifies for inclusion under  criteria 3 either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:PROF)

Comment: Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability|Existence ≠ Notability, and the sources found so far establish only his existence. I see no evidence that he passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)