Deletion of Tim White-Sobieski

Comment: This person fails , but that is not a sole factor in deciding what is notable and what is not. Does the person meet ? '''Barely'''. And I do mean barely. He (and one or more of his works) is ''mentioned'' in many different sources, such as http://www.metropolismag.com/March-2006/East-Meets-West-on-the-Champs-Elys-eacutees/ this magazine article, as well as http://www.myvirtualpaper.com/doc/WhiteWall/whitewallsummer2010/2010080201/51.html#50 this one. He's also mentioned in some news articles as well (such as https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welt.de%2Flifestyle%2Farticle2869221%2FKunst-und-Mode-sind-eine-gute-Partie.html&edit-text=&act=url here (translated), and https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stern.de%2Flifestyle%2Fleute%2Fvanessa-beecroft-vuitton-und-die-nackten-frauen-3329788.html&edit-text=&act=url here (also translated)). The sources (collectively) do add up to be significant ''per se'', and there are many more sources that do mention his work such as art centers and publishers (not secondary sources, but they are noted and considered). Why such a weak keep? Because I don't see any sources that cover the person ''himself'' in an in-depth manner, nor do I see anything regarding his work that asserts any kind of cultural, social, or societal impact. I'm really on the fence about this vote, mostly because the sources that I found ''mention'' him and one or more of his artistic pieces, but aren't ''exclusively covering'' the person. But, the many sources I found were plentiful, reliable, and secondary. For these reasons, I believe the article meets  and that notability is established... barely, but just enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: This article is definitely overkill. Way too much info, far too much analysis. This is an encyclopedia, not a catalogue essay. However, his exhibition record easily satisfies : he's been in numerous museum exhibitions and is part of many collections. As for , he just reaches the threshold. I would like to see more third-party sources (there's far too many catalogue essays) but the bare minimum is there. I'd also like to point out that limited circulation and/or offline publications are not liabilities. We need sources that are independent of the subject and it looks like there are a few. In-depth museum catalogues are good for  however as they demonstrate importance in the field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)