Deletion of Brick&Bolt

Comment: This a small and relatively new business, and the content is promotional in tone. The referencing is repetitive and based on press releases. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: In addition to being not notable, the article is highly promotional, as can be sen from the origin story, typical of what PR people write for their clients. Even more important, '''Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in the format of a press release, it is  reasonable to ask  whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on  onflict of Interest|Conflict of Interest  If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also  for the necessary disclosures.'''{{small|1=—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:PAID)

Comment: Small private software development company of 66 individuals. Entirely non-notable. Fails  on my levels
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: falling way short of ; could well be deleted per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:SNOW)

Comment: The sourcing is |essentially standard notices and the article as writ is eutral point of view|promotional. A Google News search only returns more standard notices (string: Brick&bolt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:N)