Deletion of 12088 Macalintal

Comment: Meets . {{tq|That the rock was named after a student is irrelevant.}} would be correct if that was just it, and not picked up by sources. But this naming (and thus the asteroid) are covered in multiple RS (e.g. http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/si/si002328.htm, http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20070413-60227/Asteroid_named_after_RP_scientist_Kintanar_ (go to the end of the article to see Macalintal cited). As such this object has a better-than-standard claim to notability, and being covered in news sources passes our general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of minor planets: 12001–13000, which perhaps could have bene ly done instead of AfD
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: to the appropriate place in List of minor planets: 12001–13000.  Per , this asteroid wouldn't be notable even if its namesake were notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)