Deletion of Meredith McIver

Comment: and '''Redirect''' to Melania Trump speech plagiarism controversy--or, better yet, to 2016 Republican National Convention#Melania Trump's speech--per  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I'm still not convinced that |she even exists, or perhaps is a ''nom de plume'' of some other person, such as a Russian spy. I want to see her birth certificate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: for better or for worse - her role as to the plagiarism controversy and ghostwriting for the Trump organization makes her notable, if only slightly beating out |BLP1E. I would '''''second a redirect/merge with Melania Trump speech plagiarism controversy''''' if said article is in-depth. As of now, both articles should remain
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as per , specifically #2. Likely to remain low-profile
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: It can always be turned back into an article later.  For now, there are serious risks of this just being a coatrack of criticism. I always tend to think that people read |BLP1E too strictly, since the third criterion disqualifies a lot of BLPs that might otherwise meet the criteria.  However, while the third criterion may be met in the current news cycle, it's unclear if it will remain so in the future. My guess is it actually ''will'' remain notable, and as the event and McIver's role are both covered more, that third criterion will ultimately be met.  But for now, I think we ought to err on the side of caution.  There's a much greater risk for harm in keeping this article than in provisionally redirecting it.''' —&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: It's not strictly BLP1E because of the coverage of her as a Trump assistant and ghostwriter, credited as co-author of his 2005 book, and writtnen up as such in The NYTimes, the Guardian and other papers back in 2005/ 2007.(links on page)  It's more like an actress who has a speaking role in a blockbuster movie, once, then, 10 years later, has a speaking role in a second blockbuster movie.  In that role she plays maybe the private secretary, but in that role she has this one famous line.  So we keep her.  Becase people years form know will stumble on that moment and want to know who she is.  Also 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)