Deletion of White phosphorus use in Iraq

Comment: I endorse what is said by Savonneux, specifically that it looks like a  and that there is a lot of conclusion drawing, with questionable connection to sources, ynth. Why anyway would this be a distinct article, rather than as part of Iraq War, White phosphorus munitions, or Halabja? Green547, is wrong in his points 2 & 3 ''(the other side doing bad things isn't an argument here)'', but he is right about this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:S)

Comment: I tried fixing it a bit but by the time you cut out all the POV stuff and the questionable assertions that are thinly connected to the refs there isnt much left aside from what is in the White phosphorus munitions article. It looks like a  that has just stealthed by for years. The references essentially cover one incident with primary accounts , there is a dearth of secondary information (investigations? interviews after the fact?). On top of it all there is a lot of open ended conclusion drawing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:PSTS)

Comment: A Wikipedia article is |not an essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)