Deletion of List of people and organizations associated with Dominionism (2nd nomination)

Comment: edit conflict I'm a little uncertain about this now. the main Dominionism article can certainly include information about various opinions as to the scope of dominionism--though such information would need to be properly attributed and framed. I'm still not convinced that these allegations can have a page of their own. This list may be a "spinout" but it seems too much like a . The page has also somehow become embroiled in intelligent design-related disputes, even though its only tangentially related to intelligent design
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: My reading of  is that it would not apply here.  Wikipedia should absolutely be free of censorship ... an article being offensive is not a reason to delete an article.  My support of deletion (and as I am reading in general, those of most people opposing deletion) is that this article is written in such a way that anyone in a community of scholars who wants to say "so-and-so acts as if (s)he is a dominionist" makes this list, even if the scholarship is on shaky ground
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CENSOR)