Deletion of Battles in Harry Potter

Comment: per nom, other delete comments, and previous AFDs. This is nothing more then a rehashed version of the already deleted articles. Much of the article is  and the rest fails  and . Just because Harry Potter fans wish to have the information on Wikipedia does not mean we should ignore our policies and guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:FICT||WP:NOTE)

Comment: Savidan has it on the nose; this is #PLOT|excessive plot summary, written in an |in-universe way, an |original synthesis, and |completely unreferenced and unreferenceable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WAF||WP:NOR||WP:FICT)

Comment: or possibly '''Transwiki''' to Harry Potter wiki - |unsourced, |unnotable |origional research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN||WP:OR)

Comment: unless reliable secondary sourcing can be found that deals with these "battles".  As-is, it is purely original research to label these fictional encounters as "Battle of X" and the extreme level of in-universe detail is in contradiction to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: per #PLOT and . Baring that, Transwiki to the http://harrypotterwiki.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Harry Potter Wiki
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: This is a textbook case of a |novel synthesis, as well as plot summary overload
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)