Deletion of FleshEatingZipper

Comment: Sparse reliable coverage, and nothing I'd be comfortable using to establish  notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: some guys got laid off and started a website? I can't see any  there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I've done some editing to the page, removing a lot of primary sources and a quote-farm that had formed in the page. A search quickly shows that while this is one of the more popular sites out there and might be usable as a RS for other articles, I don't see anything to show that this site is notable enough to merit an article of its own. No matter how nicely written or reliable the site's own posts are, primary sources can't show notability. I think it might just be  for this website to have an entry. It's only been up for a year and while it apparently got some initial hits for covering an author rant, being popular doesn't mean that you get an entry. It just means that it's possible for the site to gain coverage to show notability, in other words, coverage that focuses on the site rather than just mentioning it. I just don't see that type of coverage at this point in time, hence the "too soon" bit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)