Deletion of Richard Felix (3rd nomination)

Comment: I shalln't !vote as I must declare a  as I know this individual slightly from my time working at Derby Museum, and am well aware of what my professional colleagues thought of his reputation for historical accuracy! Brilliant at self-promoting Derby's history, he did become a minor personality on a paranormal TV programme. However I see little in the sources which show ''in depth'' coverage of the person, despite lots and lots of articles in which he appears. If the outcome were not to keep it, I might have thought that redirect to Most Haunted would certainly be more appropriate than any decision to simply delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: to Most Haunted#Former team members. Does not pass , there's a fair quantity of hits but none of the coverage is significant/in-depth even the BBC reference is nothing more than casual, and certainly insufficient by itself. I think redirecting to the former member section makes more sense so searchers immediately see what they were looking for even though he is mentioned in other areas in the article. I don't see deletion as a huge negative since I strongly suspect the very next search made upon hitting that dead end would be for Most Haunted since that's what he is known for, but redirects are cheap, and it's a reasonable target, so by a narrow margin is preferred in this case. Special:Contributions/2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D|2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)