Deletion of Socialist Rifle Association

Comment: as failing .  Most of the sources are total garbage; their own website, twitter, youtube, etc.  I spot-checked a few that looked promising.  https://web.archive.org/web/20171226200748/http://www.mintpressnews.com:80/liberal-gun-owners-exist-but-most-arent-big-fans-of-the-nra/208286/ MintPress News has a passing mention.  https://www.freepresshouston.com/its-going-to-be-okay-two-bills-you-really-dont-need-to-worry-about-in-an-otherwise-hostile-legislature/ Free Press Houston is another passing mention.  A splinter group which has existed for seven months; it would be extraordinary for them to have gotten enough coverage to pass , and the dearth of  backs that up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:NORG||WP:RS)

Comment: Besides local coverage (https://wdevradio.com/news-review-colin-meyn-folks-left-should-love-second-amendment-questions-listeners/ here and https://philadelphiapartisan.com/2017/08/12/armed-and-revolutionary/ here), the organization was dragged (though slightly) into the Charlottesville racial incident. After it, the organization has been mentioned in https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/13/charlottesville-unite-the-right-rally-anniversary-police The Guardian and in a recent academic https://books.google.com.pr/books?id=m9pjDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT269&lpg=PT269&dq=%22Socialist+Rifle+Association%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=iYNOPoB1gb&sig=_e4cvCHSi3vk6H5UjxR_FrYJrW0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiF1qP71YLeAhVKj1kKHfJnBQU4MhDoATAGegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=%22S book. That should be notability enough (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)