Deletion of 2015 London general election protest

Comment: Absolutely not in breach of . 'As Wikipedia is not a paper source, editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events'. This article is not written as a news report or in a journalistic style. This article also meets  - 'Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analysed afterwards (as described below
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: as above. (United_Kingdom_general_election,_2015#Protests.) Fails notability per  (no "enduring historical significance"; "national coverage" very small compared to election/formation of government or some other protests; it's received some "international coverage" as part of coverage of the election but not huge international coverage on the level of e.g. Ferguson protests; not "very widely covered in diverse sources"; no "lasting effect" or long duration of coverage).  overrides  by specifying how events which receive coverage in multiple sources could still be non-notable. Wikipedia:Notability_(events)#Alternatives_to_deletion suggests merging. The article is short and could easily be merged
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:EVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . As of right now, not notable enough. If it garners news coverage more internationally and survives the next week, I'd be more inclined to say keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: Can't see how this is notable.  is probably the most relevant thing here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per rational of my  and LadyLeitmotif who raised a good point, 100 hooligans vandalising a cenotaph or memorial is not a full scale riot or long term protest. Had some cheeky begger not removed my PROD we would not be debating this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)

Comment: this has good info, the protest was well covered, and five police were injured. It doesn't meet the criteria though for its own article based on  (as I don't see any follow-up coverage or analysis - this is what we mean about depth of coverage). I think it should be appended to United Kingdom general election, 2015. If it pops back up in the news for some reason (they try to make a law you can't be on Downing Street  for 24 hours after the election because of it, the 17 people arrested are charged with terrorism, etc etc) it can be recreated
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)