Deletion of Edith Grace White

Comment: per : there are multiple independent reliable sources that provide sufficient coverage of the subject. WP:NACADEMIC is a red herring to weasel in subjects who don't already have biographical entries in legitimate encyclopedias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per above mentioned sources, and a hard  slap to the nominator for this highly misguided nomination.  and  are obviously satisfied here. Note that now an NYT obit has been added. Instead of piling on to Gender bias on Wikipedia and trying to delete biographies of highly notable female subjects, our efforts would be much better spent adding new such biographies to Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: per the above !votes.  is mostly geared towards helping evaluate scholars who are alive and active today, not historical figures, and citation counts for historical figures are generally unindicative
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)