Deletion of A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism

Comment: Fails #Independent sources rather plainly. No sources that aren't anarcho-capitalist fringe theorists have discussed this topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: I have located three book reviews from http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/book-review-a-theory-of-socialism-and-capitalism-economics-politics-and-ethicsz-by-hans-hermann-hoppe/#axzz2jvjTteES the Freeman, http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/15/rp_15_10.pdf Reason papers and http://mises.org/daily/3780 the Mises Institute. The last review is not independent of Hoppe, but the first two reviews seem to be. There is also some criticism/review of the book in this http://www.reasonpapers.com/pdf/351/rp_351_8.pdf Reason papers article. There is nothing in WP policy regarding notability that bans ideologically similar sources; independent reliable sources are enough. 2 independent  book reviews (or 3 if you consider the last criticism/review to be in enough depth) seem to be enough to satisfy criterion 1 of  for notability. The article needs better sourcing and I'm not sure that the list of chapters is useful, but these are surmountable problems, per  and are not a reason for deletion. A notable topic and surmountable article problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: Article has , and  should be followed. (Article improvements have been undertaken
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:ATD)

Comment: The bar for notability with respect to books is quite high, per . Opponents of deletion have only cited fringe ideological sources, which is nowhere near sufficient to justify the article's existence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)