Deletion of Dănuț Marcu

Comment: Google search is flawed due to rare Rumanian accents in the name.  Never been an attack article - the person's notability is tied to his academic misdeeds, so naturally much of the article describes those and how they have been addressed by the academic community.  Regardless of the number of misdeeds, your reading of  seem biased to me.  An individual publishing over 300 math articles many in reputable journals is surely notable, regardless how many of them are plagiarism.  This is the same as footballer playing over 300 games in a big league, regardless of his goal percentage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He has no notability other than plagiarism, so no  for biographical details, and there is already a mention of him at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_plagiarism_incidents, which should be sufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: easily meets , author is http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=%22d+marcu%22&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdtf=&as_sdts=5&hl=en very highly cited, with one article cited 1880 times; h-index appears to be above 50.  The article was well-sourced until it was gutted; one particularly useful source was http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10288-006-0087-0?LI=true this one, detailing his plagiarism history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: If he is only well known for plagiarism then would he not fail under ?  "Editors are advised to be cognizant of issues of |weight and to avoid the creation of unnecessary |pseudo-biographies, especially of |living people
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:WEIGHT||WP:PSEUDO||WP:BLP)

Comment: Wikipedia takes no position on whether the subject has committed plagiarism. It just notes reliable sources that allege that he has. These are enough to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: of course, you realize that he can't meet  if the papers in question ''aren't his''. The very fact of the plagiarism brings into doubt the authorship of ''all of his papers'', so that they can't be used as support for notability. His is notable under  only if the work is actually his, which is doubtful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)