Deletion of Cody Hutchings

Comment: this is tragic and dreadful news. But it is also simply news -  clearly covered under #NEWS, not an encyclopaedic topic. Except for minor mentions, and possibly next years anniversary, this will fade from view soon. Delete it - if there is any news interest in 6 months(very very unlikely) then it may have the longevity for an article but at the moment this is clearly covered under  and Wikipedia:BLP#Articles_about_people_notable_only_for_one_event (particularly the sentence ''If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted''...the passing of a law in response does not make this two events
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:RS and  are addressed by the ''multiple Reliable Secondary Sources Independent of the subject.''  is addressed by the fact there are two events. 1 - his murder, 2 the affect on Victoria|Victorian law
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: unfortunately, being a murder victim is not an uncommon enough event that it makes you notable.   and all that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as notable per  so passes  and new law pushed by state premier that carries the name "Cody's law
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: per . Sad, but not notable (and really, you don't want to be immortalised on Wikipedia for this sort of thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Unfortunate, tragic, sad etc. However, despite adequate coverage (which is not in dispute), Wikipedia is not a memorial, obituary, or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)