Deletion of Autocunnilingus (2 nomination)

Comment: Reviewing the VfD and AfD, all I see is a bunch of keep votes based on ... google hits. No sources. No PROOF that this can actually be done. Loads of hoax pictures. In the VfD the main reason repeated for keep was that this was a 'real, growing article'. It's a stub with a CARTOON drawing of a fantasy act that men want to believe in. Without FIRM proof, this fails  and . Voting 'clean up' or 'expand' is pointless, since nothing -- '''nothing''' -- has been done to do either since the VfD or 1st AfD. If this was about something from Scientology , or about Creationism, or something controversial that people hated the idea of, none of you would be voting keep based on the merits of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: I don't really care if it's possible or not, it could be included as a hoax/urban legend/whatever. But I see no reliable sources even saying that... just a bunch of Wikipedia mirrors, blogs, forums and other classic signs that this is something people with internet access and time to kill care about, but no one else apparently. This has been tagged as needing sourcing for http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Autocunnilingus&oldid=42280254 8 months and no one could find anything... I'd close this as a delete but I'll leave it to another admin, this has serious  issues that need to be considered
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)