Deletion of Environmental health policy

Comment: It's the nomination that is junk.  This is not a personal essay because there's nothing about the authors' experiences or personal opinions.  It's not OR because this is not a novel topic and there are plenty of sources.  The topic is clearly notable because there are entire books written about it such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ERERUXpacHcC Environmental Health Policy'' or ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fzg7DwAAQBAJ Environmental Policy and Public Health''.  The usual policies apply: , , , , , , , &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:BITE||WP:CENSOR||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: nbsp;– as Andrew notes above, there is a wealth of verifiable sources that discuss environmental health policy. The above sources, and notable organizations including the https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/95/8/16-171736/en/ WHO and https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/environmental.html CDC, treat the topic as a distinct subject focusing on specific human health aspects, and the subject may be treated as a |notable subtopic of environmental health. While it may read like an essay, the statements are at least supported by numerous journal articles that distinguish the page from the original research and personnel essay tenets of OTESSAY
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: I can't believe we didn't have an article on such a clearly notable topic before 2017. Ye Gods, the environmental coverage within Wikipedia is even more dire than I thought!. This is so clearly a notable topic, and of course needs a link from the Environmental health article as well as needing a new redirect from Environmental health action plan {{done}}. 4.4 million hits on Google and so many obvious sources that show this meets . I don't mean to be (too) rude, but a trout to the nominator ({{u|Crossroads1}}), who I genuinely urge to read  lest you do further potential damage to this encyclopaedia in areas you don't understand. Oh, and a barnstar to the student editors who did a pretty fair job
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)