Deletion of Stephanie Carter

Comment: Unfortunately, BabbaQ seems to conflate "I think it's important" with Wikipedia's definition of notability.  There is nothing in the GNG giving presumptive notability to the honoree of bike races, nor to those in whose name a scholarship is given, nor to fundraisers provoked by closing arguments in criminal trials, even when such allegations are supported by reliable sources, which is not the case here.  What elements of the GNG or any pertinent notability criteria does anyone think are met here?  So far, it looks like a  case to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: or '''redirect''' to Child sexual abuse laws in the United States. References #1 and #5 consist of realtively insignificant coverage about the subject and bike race in local news sources. This fails . References #3 and #4 are from a website attempting to raise awareness about child abuse; it does not appear to fulfill the "reliable source" criteria. The strongest argument for keeping is reference #2, a document from the South Carolina legislature, which gives a brief overview of the case and the bill that was drawn-up. The vast majority of GHits for "Stephanie's Law", however, refer to legislation in another state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)