Deletion of Joe Szwaja

Comment: As noted, there are a number of references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject, hitting all the points in .  As for : "Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." (though one might argue that Madison, Wisconsin|Madison, the capitol of Wisconsin, isn't a major metropolitan city, and he there isn't much from his seven years on council there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails  as well. The coverage is not significant under the terms of the guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails rof and olitician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P)

Comment: In my opinion, the sources listed in the article are enough to meet the |general notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are articles surrounding his election efforts, but I do think it fails olitician
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Szwaja fails  but he passes  / . As {{user|Davewild}} http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FBob_Poe&action=historysubmit&diff=328242624&oldid=328237546 wrote at another AfD, "The general notability guideline supersedes any subject specific guidelines." Wikipedia:Notability (people) (which encompasses ) says that "A person is presumed notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." Szwaja has clearly received this coverage.See http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003973413_elexseacouncilone25m.html this article from ''The Seattle Times'', where Szwaja receives over ten paragraphs of coverage, and http://www.seattlepi.com/local/337639_council01.html this article from ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'', where he receives exactly ten paragraphs of coverage. These sources, coupled with the numerous sources already present in the article, establish that Joe Szwaja passes Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)