Deletion of List of LiveJournal users

Comment: Non-notable, uncited fancruft; does not even remotely pass  or . Looking at it (even the article title), I have no idea why it exists other than as '''promotion''' for LiveJournal. We don't have a viable List of _____ users for any other item/brand/website that I am aware of, and the article gives zero indication that these people's use of LiveJournal is in any way encyclopedically notable any more than any notable person's use of any product, blog site, micro-blog site, website, or web host is notable per se
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTN)

Comment: I disagree with the merge proposal, basically per what Exemplo has said (nothing really to merge). Fails , but I wouldn't really call it promotional, though I can see how others might interpret it as being along those lines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: Fails |our general notability guidelines.  Fails |our policy on the notability of lists. To the extent that it lists living people without any source, fails . Trivial. Fancruft. All in all, a pretty good template for what a Wikipedia list article ought not to be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NLIST||WP:BLP)