Deletion of Hemmingwell

Comment: Again, : "'''subdivisions''', business parks, housing developments, ... etc. should be included in the more '''general article''' on the legally recognized populated place" (my bolding).{{indent}}The two sources presented here are not |verifiable evidence of notability on a level that warrents a |standalone page.{{indent}}The argument that {{tq|this does stand alone meaning that an article should really be made for the other 4 wells of Wellingborough}} sounds dubious; five small stubs doesn't make each other look less stub-ish
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:NRV||WP:PAGEDECIDE)

Comment: or merge. Unfortunately we can't keep this unsourced article under  or  as it stands - my  search brought up surprisingly little (youths getting shot, car thefts, and primary sources from the Wellingborough council.)  says: ''If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the informal place should be included in the more general article on the legally recognized populated place or administrative subdivision that contains it.'' - including this information in the Wellingborough article would be the proper thing to do for this unsourced stub (possibly with the other four wells), unless other sources/other independent notability can be shown
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND||WP:BEFORE)