Deletion of Cris Ericson (2nd nomination)

Comment: Elaborating why I think the subject meets Wikipedia notability requirements at  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: the case for deletion is that she (very definitely) doesn't meet NPOL, and there's no claim of notability for her other than through  election-related coverage. I note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Creswell as a similar case recently closed as deleted.  No amount of election-related coverage will make a perennial candidate notable, they must have some coverage other than as a politician to meet GNG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: per HopsonRoad's fine re-analysis of The Hammer of Thor's sources, also noting that several of the delete statements about perennial candidacies reduce to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)