Deletion of ThatGuyWithTheGlasses

Comment: once again: blogs, online forums and the like do not constitute |reliable sources; nor does mention in such places constitute notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS)

Comment: there is no more useless argument for retention than, ''"He's up-and-coming/They're gonna get bigger/If you delete her now, you'll have to create a new article when she becomes more famous."'' All of these are really just different ways of saying, "I tacitly admit this subject is not yet notable; but |I believe the subject will become notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Let's see: two blogs, two webforums, and a post at digg.com. Nope; that's nothing (and just because the AVGN has a website, doesn't make his website a |reliable source (or notable, incidentally
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS)

Comment: Is the subject of secondary reliable independent sources as cited above, the core criterion of .  Once again, some WP users have it in for Youtube celebs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: blogs, forum posts and Digg links do not convey notability at this time. Also, just because |other stuff is on Wikipedia doesn't mean this gets to be as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)