Deletion of Muhammad Siddique Dar

Comment: Page is in accordance to  of its sources, It is not problematic as satisfying  recommendations. Additionally there are nothing to be considered as objectionable in view of . Write up is also satisfactory to . Page under review has no issues related to , . There is no violations of  provisions.  Contribution is covered under URATOR and is part of OIU. Person satisfies  and is in accordance to  in Urdu language being president or Shakh of a spiritual chain, author of notable works, and author of considerable influence in research and literature on Islamic mysticism and spirituality
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:C||WP:NPOV||WP:AB||WP:SELFPROMOTE||WP:SELFCITE||WP:CURATOR||WP:COIU||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I'm going to have to second the comparison here to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tauheediyah and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Hakim Ansari. Promotional articles on obscure South Asian religious figures is extremely common on the encyclopedia, and almost every instance shares a few constants such as poor writing, re-citing the same source over and over to inflate the references, and asserting little notability about the subjects other than that they were good people. Like the others, this article fails the  on the most basic level. The fact that the subject's supposed notoriety revolves around the above mentioned deleted articles also severely damages any possible claims of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Author of books, editor in chief of a printed magazine that is being published in 17 years, translator of books, shakh or head in spiritual chain as saint, shrine and ceremonials after death, having highest awards from his armed forces head of country  'Chief of Air Staff Commendation Certificate' and from president of a country Pakistan ‘Tamgha-i-Khidmat - II’ (  – If person has one highest award. He has two highest awards.) are supportive to his notability. If independent sources are not available on him as ‘saint’ it is not only the case in biographies of saints.  High award winners always get published and discussed in departmental and national media.  - Special:Contributions/182.187.38.242|182.187.38.242
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE)