Deletion of Perfect Soul

Comment: The EP was deleted per  in the middle of this AfD. The duo seems to be notable, but their EP is not. With more reliable sources added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G7)

Comment: The artist article has been updated and now has more references, these include multiple reliable, independent reviews from notable magazines, and other sources. The article is sufficient enough to pass  and is not . In regards to the separate album article, I agree with the proposed deletion as it doesn't call for a standalone page at present
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per . The first source in the band's article is a local fanzine blurb written by their brother, and the second is from a friendly fan's blog. I can find nothing else beyond the usual social media and self-promotional sites. Their album was just released and only appears in the usual streaming and retail services, with a couple of reprinted press releases, but no reliable reviews or other coverage. Good luck to them as they get started but these Wikipedia articles (band and album) are simply attempted promotions for the time being
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per nom. I think this is a textbook case of ; Wikipedia is not the place to promote a band, ''if'' the band achieves sustained notability then the article will follow. Adding additional poor sources will not help this article demonstrate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)