Deletion of Stephen Darby (2nd nomination)

Comment: per #Athletes, /Notability. No professional appearances, no notability: it's so simple
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:FOOTY)

Comment: personally I don't agree with people saying  criteria is satisfied, I don't think enough ''substantial'' and ''reliable'' sources have been provided. For instance, a BBC profile with a load of zeros is not a reliable source covering the subject in substantial depth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As per the reason for my withdrawal of the original AfD, while he doesn't pass #Athletes, /Notability, he does pass #Basic criteria which overrides those two anyway, in that he has a profile on the UEFA site, which is reliable and independent. If UEFA finds him important enough to mention then so should we
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:FOOTY||WP:BIO)

Comment: For the sake of clarity, could at least someone advocating a deletion adress the point of the general  criteria. Are you saying the additional criteria (professional football) overrides the basic criteria (significant coverage in reliable sources), or that the coverage isn't significant enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails #Athletes as he has never played in a fully professional game. Consensus is that youth caps do not confer notability. He can have an article when he actually plays a game! Until then there is the possibility that he won't actually ever appear for the first team and slides away into obscurity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)