Deletion of Pascal Le Deunff

Comment: Ambassadors are not deemed "inherently" notable just because they exist, but get articles only if they can be shown to clear  on their ''sourceability''. But of the six footnotes here, three are |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, two are glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage whose primary subject is something or someone ''other'' than ''him'', and one is a Q&A interview in which he's talking about himself in the first person — which means that exactly zero of them are helping to get him over GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)