Deletion of Suite101.com

Comment: No evidence that site meets . References are outdated/weak
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I believe  applies here, and this article fails it. The one source that is provided as an example of third-party coverage doesn't strike me as very substantial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per Sandstein.  I am not partisan regarding the addition of links to S101 in WP articles - that can be dealt with separately.  Here we are discussing notability of a website per .  A single 4½ year old article (which basically said the company was in decline) in a non-notable email newsletter is a clever find, but does not achieve notability for the company.  The information we have is that the company operates under a different business model now and therefore that citation is largely irrelevant on content alone.  Regarding the Alexa rank, I wonder if that link wasn't achieved at least in part through spamming Wikipedia.  If this company was notable, there'd be a lot more independent reviews and news on them than there seems to be.  &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)