Deletion of Phil Long (entrepreneur)

Comment: Yes, it should obviously have been speedied A7. if you look at the contributions of the editor who declined it, there's a clear pattern of failing to apply the "credible" part of the "credible claim of significance or importance" criterion in #A7. One  article after another gets its speedy declined, usually with the edit summary ''"asserts enough significance to survive A7"''. The end result is a sharp increase in the number of pointless, time-wasting AFDs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: local businessman, |one of hundreds of local car dealership owners in the United States
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: No assertion of notability, fails . I also would have speedied it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This person does not satisfy  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I tagged this as a speedy delete under A7 since I could see no claim of notability. I can still see no evidence of any notability. He was a successful car dealer in Colorado. Probably a nice guy. That's it. Fails  '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)