Deletion of San Francisco in popular culture

Comment: I think this one actually does meet  since the entries on the list are individually notable. Perhaps the article could be renamed to "List of....". Could also be split into pages such as "List of Movies and Television shows that take place in San Francisco" and "List of San Francisco Literature", or something similar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: As shown by the sources found, the topic fulfills . The fact that the article currently is not in good shape is not a reason for deletion.  gives guidelines how to trim this so that it does ''not'' fail . Some of what is present would remain in this case, and some would be thrown out. Which is what can be decided using secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INPOPULARCULTURE||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: as per nom's rationale, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Mixed feelings here; the topic is indisputably notable, but the article is a shitty indiscriminate list of movies and films, etc. The three sources provided are absolutely garbage. It could be deleted on  grounds, and hopefully that would encourage someone to recreate it on better footing. If it is kept, it would be worthy of stubbing and getting a substantial rewrite
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: This seems to be part of yet another round of cookie-cutter, drive-by nominations without a trace of ,  or .  The nomination is ostensibly based on  but that's ridiculous because that is itself an indiscriminate ragbag of arbitrary exclusions such as software logs, none of which apply.  The topic here is actually quite specific and not indiscriminate at all.  Then there's  which is just an |essay – some OR prejudice with no official standing.  And then there's some |other stuff but Maine is not San Francisco is it?  San Francisco is a cultural centre – a massive influence with corresponding coverage which the nomination fails to address.  Here's some examples
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:CIVIL||WP:IINFO||WP:INPOPULARCULTURE||WP:ESSAY||WP:OTHERSTUFF)