Deletion of Richard Fountain

Comment: I did the original speedy of this article after research found nothing that showed he could pass . I did http://www.amazon.com/dp/ASIN/1570723265 find the book on Amazon, but when http://www.overmountainpress.com/ the publisher doesn't even have a website and the Publisher's Weekly review says, "Paper-thin characters and routine prose don't help the implausible plot," I think we can pass. If at some point he does become notable, it's easy enough to recreate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The part here is ''has work'''s''''' - this is just one book not works plural. I admire the effort here, and believe any published author has done well - but we need '''third-party''' information from |reliable sources. For information, in the UK it is a legal requirement that any book with an ISBN has a copy at the British Library - so just being in a collection really does not imply notabilty. For further information both of my parents are multiple (by wich I mean > 300 books in my fathers case) published writers, and one has a Wikipedia entry, so I do know whereof I speak, both as an admin on Wikipedia and as someone with more than a passing knowledge of the publishing world
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The article is poorly written, and needs wikification, but it shows some evidence of notability.  The Google searches noted above do, in fact, show |some evidence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)