Deletion of Plantpot

Comment: In British English, at least, "flowerpot" is the common name for this, whether it contains a flowering plant or not (I was brought up watching "Flower Pot Men|Bill and Ben the flowerpot men" not "Bill and Ben the plantpot men"). If this is different in other varieties of English then the grandfather clause of  needs to be invoked. A merge to container garden would be wrong because flowerpots are used in many other contexts, for example for houseplants, in plant nurseries and as an addition to normal gardens. Notability isn't an issue, with http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=+subject:%22Flowerpots%22&client=firefox-a these books being about the subject, and these academic papers:https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF01371732http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200114/000020011401A0579215.phphttps://doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1007106823791. They can also be a health hazard.http://www.koreamed.org/SearchBasic.php?DT=1&RID=463290
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:ENGVAR)

Comment: No matter what name you move it to, it'll be an unreferenced dictionary entry. Are there really |reliable sources that describe the usage, construction, history, and aesthetics of plant containers? If consensus is to move, I'd also probably pick plant container
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: plus move to flowerpot; this is clearly a significant topic (enough so that we could |bend notability guidelines if necessary) that should be covered by an encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)