Deletion of Sephardic Pizmonim Project (3rd nomination)

Comment: to Pizmonim.  I would have suggested a merge, but I checked and found a section on "Sephardic Pizmonim Project" already in the "Pizmonim" article, nearly a word-for-word copy of the article under discussion.  The Project is not notable per the standard criteria of  - it's a local undertaking, and the figures of sales are not referenced.  Most of the references and links in the article have more to do with Pizmonim in general than with this particular project; hence the logic of a merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: You don't get three tries, unless something very significant has changed. Only '''one person''' in the last AfD even mentioned the "not enough time to tell yet" argument, and chances are he would have voted Keep anyway. Besides, your claim that no progress has been made since the last AfD is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sephardic_Pizmonim_Project&diff=150040209&oldid=108681904 questionable. And even if it were the case, "no one has bothered to make this article good yet" is not a #Reasons_for_deletion|reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: This "organization" doesn't meet ''any'' notability standards, not even "on a relative basis" - irrespective of how culturally valid a topic it is. Please, please remember that we have to follow , and specifically , no matter how compelling an article looks at first glance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CORP)

Comment: I can't see how that argument helps the article survive the standards of . Sure, it's an important cause, but it's not notable and the burden of proof is on those who would vote keep to show that it is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)