Deletion of Akaneon

Comment: sorry; I understand your desire to create a website and use publicity, but please realize, "Wikipedia is #Wikipedia is not a directory|not a directory of everything that has ever existed" (from policy page), nor is |spam acceptable. I believe that you're trying to use it for advertisement. If your site becomes notable, you can post it here ''afterwards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SPAM)

Comment: just by looking at the google results and impressive number of sources in the article. And after reading the author's comments, there's no doubt in my mind that this is a typical , non- article with no intent but to promote its subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: Non-notable, fails .  A new website is not notable, unless it's been featured in the press as having done something significantly different or something to distinguish itself from the crowd.  This one hasn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I invoke CSD criteria A7 and G11, , and  as reasons for deletion. And demanding that others provide proof for the "non-notability" of this article defies negative proof|logic and violates  where it explicitly states, "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article. If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WEB||WP:V)

Comment: notability not evident, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: seems to fail . Only assertion of notability seems to be "by association" (that someone from MySpace assisted in its creation), only other sources are primary. No secondary sources are cited per criterion 1 (multiple, secondary, non-trivial writeups), no assertion that the site has won a non-trivial award per criterion 2, no assertion of independent distribution per criterion 3. Per discussion above, "someone else got away with it" is not a notability criterion-that just may mean some other page may have slipped by and needs to be sent here as well. Myspace, however, is not one of those-it at least undisputedly meets rule 1 of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)