Deletion of List of Community Transit bus routes

Comment: fails  since independent sources don't seem to discuss this list as an entity. A list is only notable if it's at least found in sources not associated with the agency. I also find the / argument convincing: the content unsurprisingly reads more like something from the agency's website than anything else. Most of the keep arguments seem to be more |"I like it" and |ad hominem than anything else, so I don't find them particularly persuasive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST||WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:NOTDIR||WP:LIKE||WP:ATTP)

Comment: as per . There is no information within this article that would not be found on a bus schedule. The "Keep" arguments are really weak
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)

Comment: This is a list of bus routes serving part of a major U.S. metropolitan area. It does ''not'' violate  since a description of whether the route runs on weekends does not make Wikipedia a travel guide, nor is a description of these routes' termini (however, the notation under the "Route 115" row to "use route 116" on Sundays is not encyclopedic). These descriptions are defining traits of the bus routes, not a "travel guide". Furthermore, the nominator says there is "no indication anywhere that these bus routes are notable". This is false, since there are at least two bus routes with articles listed on that very page, both of which are substantial articles with many reliable secondary sources. Further, I have found https://search.proquest.com/results/810DBA2125FB4D61PQ/1 several hundred news articles for Community Transit routes, and there may well be more news articles and other secondary sources on other databases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)