Deletion of Knowledge services

Comment: There is too much of this unreadable, vague, and airy knowledge management cruft already.  Consider the lead paragraph''Knowledge services is an emerging concept that integrates Knowledge Management, Knowledge organizations, and Knowledge markets. Knowledge Services are programs that produce or provide content-based organizational outputs with embedded value that are intended to be used or transferred to meet external user wants or needs. Knowledge services are delivered through a service delivery spectrum that functions within knowledge markets.''After reading this, do you really know something you didn't know before?  First, this is an "emerging concept"; that in itself violates |several well established rules here.  More importantly, is there any substance to this "concept?"  Let's look for nouns and active verbs.  We have "programs" that "produce or provide" "outputs" with "value" that "meet external user wants and needs."  It seems that the chief thing to know about Knowledge Services is that you ''could have thought it all up yourself'' while reading a thesaurus on a break for No. 2.  This is not knowledge; it is language gone pathological. All of this |bollocks needs to be gone, ''gone'', '''gone''', '''''gone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: as a |neologism. Coined, I think, to market IT services
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: as a |neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)