Deletion of Leslie Daigle (2nd nomination)

Comment: Agreeing with Shalott. This local council member fails ; the position itself is not notable. The position and coverage are local, and much of the coverage regards a |non-event, biographically speaking
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: spaced ndash}} Actually, the provision of additional significant coverage in reliable sources proves that '''the topic easily passes criteria #3 of ''', which states
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Neutral. My take is that the content dispute is primarily an edit war with an interest in trashing the subject, and I agree with Drmie's characterization of the edits as  violations and vandalism. That circumstance ought to be separated from the notability concern, and isn't itself a rationale for deletion. Special:Contributions/99.136.254.195|99.136.254.195
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Passes the subject specific guideline for this sort of thing .  See item 2 ''Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.'' This person has gotten ample coverage, as found and linked to in the last AFD and in the article now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails  spectacularly. Coverage incidental to the minor office and doesn't quality as significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails . Lacks coverage in |reliable third-party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:RS)

Comment: per Dru of Id and per standard Wikipedia practice for political candidates. Those who are arguing for "delete" should reread : "In the case of candidates for political office who do not meet this (notability) guideline, '''the general rule is to redirect''' to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Subject is a local councilwoman who does not pass .  Her candidacy for state assembly is not sufficient to satisfy  -- if she wins, that's possible a different story
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per Valenciano. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: spaced ndash}} '''Additional ''new'' sources''' about Leslie Daigle. This regional coverage further demonstrates the topic's notability, in which the topic now passes ,  and criteria #3 of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Even if everything in the article was accurate, it's not clear that she's had enough secondary coverage to satisfy  (she certainly doesn't satisfy  as a member of a city council). However, some of the claims are not accurate. Some of the inflated assertions come partly from her Newport Beach government website bio (http://www.newportbeachca.gov/index.aspx?page=91). If you read any of the councilmember's bios, they are all written like advertisements. Even if we accept the "facts" in her bio as true, there are still inaccurate representations in our article. We say she is a "leading member" of the finance committee. She is (or was) not, she's described as a member (there are 3 members on the committee, one of whom is chair - (http://newportbeachca.gov/modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=102)) in the bio. We say that thanks to her, the city got a AAA rating (perhaps the most important claim in the article, in my view), and yet the secondary source we cite (http://dailyvoice.squarespace.com/news/2010/10/19/newport-gets-top-credit-rating.html doesn't even mention her name, and her bio says, that she "worked with her colleagues" to obtain that rating, not that she obtained it somehow on her own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: My original rationale for nominating this article for deletion still stands: Non notable local councillor, who fails , has only minor coverage and is really a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BLP1E)