Deletion of Rosgeologiya (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are enough sourceshttp://www.interfax.ru/business/txt.asp?id=113918http://www.barentsobserver.com/40-billion-rub-for-shelf-exploration.4726568.html, so it's clearly a real and serious proposal. But WP is not a |crystal ball. We should create the article ''after'' the company has been created. (Which will apparently happen in two years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: If sources exist demonstrating notability of this proposal then there is nothing in  that precludes our having an article about it. There are plenty more potential sources here: {{find|Росгеология}}. It's too late for me to get my head around my very rusty Russian tonight (I haven't used it in anger for over 30 years), so I'll leave it for now to others to evaluate those sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)