Deletion of List of Galaxy Cinemas theatres

Comment: as per DGG. Also, the items in the list are unlikely to ever be articles themselves, so there's no potential navigation purpose to this list; and it's a violation of  which Wikipedia Is Not. Lists of train stations and even subway stations have an encyclopedic use for readers interested in railroads, transportation, local history and other topics, as you can often see by clicking on the links to individual stations (and the "What links here" link at individual station articles). Lists for newspaper chains have a similar broad interest. Where is the broad interest in a cinema chain list? What encyclopedic purpose would it serve that would be different from a directory? A list embedded in an article about the chain could be justified, perhaps, as information that helps the reader better understand that chain. But not when you reach the size of this list combined with the other two lists for other divisions of Cineplex Entertainment. Editors who worked on this list might want to consider the approach taken in Cinema in Delhi, where the history and interesting features of some of the movie theaters is described. I'm not suggesting that anyone try to do the exact same thing with cinema in, say, Vancouver, but it's the kind of cinema-related article that can be done and can survive AfD (it did), and I suspect it was more interesting to research and write. Just a suggestion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: I fail to see the inherent notability or need for ''any'' list of cinemas, or any other lengthy list of a type or brand of businesses, at least as a stand-alone article. (Shorter lists ''might'' be OK as part of the main article about the subject.) If there are other such lists on Wikipedia now, I think they should be deleted. Wikipedia |is not a directory
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)