Deletion of Solairus Aviation

Comment: the refs cited are all company, the refs mentioned above all look like press releases to me. The article looks like a COI attempt to promote the company, at least up until the most recent edits on it. If kept it would require a serious rewrite and removal of corpspam material. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Considering that not all the refrences cited are company propaganda, this company is notable as a "start-up" but I agree with AHunt that  is involved and a rewrite is in order. FWiW
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I'm disappointed that sockpuppetry had to come into play here, but the article looks to have a fair amount of notability in it. http://theaircharterjournal.com/news/solairus-professionals/ This, http://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/22537/petaluma-based-solairus-aircraft-on-growth-trajectory/ this, http://theaircharterjournal.com/news/solairus-one-year/ this and http://www.airportbusiness.com/online/article.jsp?id=30271&siteSection=1 this are all examples of independent reliable coverage, of which the first three at least would qualify as significant. The only issue could be , but since the sources all refer to different events that shouldn't be an issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)