Deletion of Aspects of Pluto

Comment: This concerns '''astrology''', '''not''' astronomy. Some of these numbers are useful when making predictions... (in which case  still applies?) But knowing how bright Pluto is some day 10 years from now is really, really, unimportant. If you want to observe on a given day you can consult a calculator; these numbers aren't for "today". I didn't stress that at first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: with some reluctance.  #INFO|Wikipedia is not an ephemeris.  If this data was, in fact, generated by software, those who want it should get and run a comparable program.  The data presented is both constrained in time to a few years before and after the present; this will require perennial updating, and there is a point after which old data will become much less interesting.  Frankly, I expected this to be about aspects of Pluto and their significance in astrology: that is an article I would cheerfully keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: THIS INFORMATION IS REALLY TRIVIAL'''. Try Googling http://www.google.com/search?q=ephemeris+calculator ephemeris calculator or even http://www.google.com/search?q=aspects+of+mars aspects of Mars - there are lots of links to choose from. Or ephemeris#External links. This is spurring lots of  related legal discussion.  is NOT the issue, and I apologize for bringing up the almanac thing. I thought it was clear that an almanac is by definition an indiscriminate collection of information... anyway, consider . Wikipedia is not an almanac and indiscriminate information is discouraged because it is NN. I don't know why people want ephemeris tables like these specifically from Wikipedia, but look at that list of calculators! You can get any data you want, very easily. The original author ignored the prod on the other articles. Could someone weigh in on how these articles are actually useful, or advantages over the calculators and tables linked from ephemeris
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NN)