Deletion of Jake Skinner

Comment: Neither a school board trustee nor an as-yet-unelected candidate in a provincial election passes  just because local coverage of them exists in the local media — local coverage ''always'' exists of ''every'' school board trustee on ''every'' school board and ''every'' as-yet-unelected candidate in ''every'' provincial election, so such coverage falls under . At this level of significance, a person gets an article ''only'' if they can be demonstrated as significantly ''more'' notable than the norm, by virtue of their coverage ''nationalizing'' to sources on the order of ''The Globe and Mail'' or the ''National Post'' or the ''Montreal Gazette'' or the ''Vancouver Sun'', and is ''not'' kept on Wikipedia just because ''local'' coverage exists in the ''local'' media. No prejudice against recreation in 2018 if he ''wins'' his seat in the provincial election and thereby becomes an actual MPP, but neither the sourcing nor the substance here gets him a Wikipedia article ''today''. And for added bonus, ''more'' than half of the referencing is to |primary sources like the TVDSB's ''own'' website about ''itself'' and the personal website of one of his colleagues ''on'' the TVDSB — but these are ''not'' sources that are ''independent'' of him, so they cannot assist in demonstrating notability at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: does not meet  and strictly a vanity page. Sources are unconvincing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)