Deletion of Lwaxana Troi

Comment: It is clearly not notable outside of the Star Trek universe, and even in the universe notability is debatable.  Delete per  it clearly has no real world notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: WP:NOEFFORT|AFD is not cleanup and this process should not be used as a threat to drive activity which is volunteer and not subject to any |deadline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: See https://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/literature_and_medicine/v020/20.1hughes.html "Medical Ethics through the Star Trek Lens", which covers her affair with a scientist from a world that sentences all elders to die. Also see http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/st/tng/mbarret.shtml this interview with Barrett, where she states "I love her. I've had women yell at me across parking lots at supermarkets, saying 'You've done more for women over forty than any movement in America!'". Lwaxana Troi is easily the second most important recurring character on the show after Q. Does the phrase  ring a bell
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: obviously notable per above sources.  Nominator is reminded that it's the ''existence'' of sources demonstrating notability that is important, not the ''presence'' of said sources in the article's current state.  (Obviously, such sources should be added, but the mere failure to do so is not grounds for deletion so long as such sources exist somewhere.)  See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM)