Deletion of Atheism 3.0

Comment: per nom. Refs are primarily from one author, who seems to have invented the neologism. The only other source we have is from the supposed leader of the movement rejecting the term. We've also already had some support for this on the talk page, per these concerns. Simply doesn't meet . &nbsp; &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The term is single http://www.religionnews.com/index.php?/rnspremiumtext/single/atheism_30_finds_a_little_more_room_for_belief1 sourced. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: The article subject is |notable. Furthermore, the statements in the article are |verifiable as they are supported by |reliable sources. I hope this helps. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: to New Atheism per . Not notable enough on its own; just one proponent
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)