Deletion of Pat Burt

Comment: per nom - fails , not otherwise notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Per nom. Burt doesn't seem to meet  with the sources provided. Company involvement isn't very notable either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: City councillors aren't inherently notable just because they exist; Palo Alto is a council-manager city where the "mayoralty" is a ceremonial position that rotates annually within the municipal council rather than being directly elected by the voters, so just throwing the word "mayor" around doesn't automatically make him more notable than other city councillors; and the sourcing is about half |primary sources (the city's and county's own self-published internal reports, etc.) that aren't support for notability at all, and half |run of the mill local coverage that fails to establish how he could be seen as more notable than the norm for a city councillor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:MILL)