Deletion of Mohamed Zairi

Comment: per David Eppstein's due diligence. The best arguments for Zairi meeting  are not persuasive, and the COI issues push this article somewhat into  territory. I admit, individually these may be insufficient to merit deletion, but I believe it would be appropriate to consider the totality of the circumstances, and thus look at the issues in aggregate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NOT)

Comment: http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/management/external/page.php?section=homenew&page=ectqm This page is enough to convince me that the Centre really was affiliated with Bradford (but ceased in 2009, explaining why his name is not listed there now) but http://www.onrec.com/news/news-archive/award-winning-management-academic-to-give-inaugural-lecture this page tells me the chair is not with Bradford but with "e-TQM College", a Dubai electronic learning institution. So there's some case to be made for #C6 but it's a bit tenuous. The fact that he used to be associated with Bradford but isn't now doesn't so much concern me (notability is permanent) as that it may or may not have really been a Bradford chair. The Harrington/Ishikawa Medal is also a plausible way for him to be notable but it seems very local and specific to me.. And the  problems are big enough, and the case borderline enough, that I think we're better off without
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:COI)

Comment: A GS h-index of 42, even in a well-cited field passes rof#1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)