Deletion of List of iPhone applications

Comment: There are multiple secondary reliable sources which list iPhone applications http://www.maclife.com/article/feature/maclifes_top_101_app_store_apps_2008?page=0%2C0http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2009/01/YE8_iphoneappshttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/3727308/Top-10-Apple-iPhone-applications.html, suggesting that the topic is indeed |notable and |verifiable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: It is true that categories and lists are two different things. Categories are useful, lists tend to be poorly maintained and filled with crufty garbage. Criteria for inclusion in this one is murky and arbitrary and it will never come anywhere near being complete. The only arguments I really see here besides DGG's are  and , both of which are irrelevant in an AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: per  items 2, 6, 7, and 11
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LC)

Comment: Categories and lists are NOT one and the same.  While they can be synergistic in some circumstances, clearly every category doesn't need a list article to follow it up.  Stand-alone lists need to live up to the same notability standards as the rest of the articles on Wikipedia, while categories do not.  This subject makes a fine category but as a list it's cruft.  It violates  since, as the article states, there are over 10000 third-party applications available for the iPhone.  If this page ''were'' properly maintained, it would be half a mile long!  Since anyone can write an iPhone application and the list's subject matter is too broad for a strict criteria for inclusion, this list is just too vague and unmanageable to be a decent article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)