Deletion of Sultan-ul-Arifeen

Comment: Please note that this one and several other AFDs on related subjects have been the target of sockpuppetry and several |SPAs. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mrashid364 for more information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: MAYASA Enterprises in the reference 1, citation 1, fails  . There is no trace of the said organization which is referring Hamza Makhdoom
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: This article has only one sentence, two citations and no proof that the term is noteworthy at all. The fact that it fails  also means, by virtue of that, that it fails a whole host of other more specific notability guidelines. It should also not be lost on the closer that those defending the article have already been mentioned on the above SPI as "probably" being socks and the citations here all seem to return to the whole Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan-ul-Faqr Publications Regd. advertising fiasco. This could almost have been speedied
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I did not find any marks of MAYASA Enterprises anywhere relating to any religious reference. It fails  . And there is not any published or documented proof of Hamza Makhdoom to carry this religious title Sultan ul Arifeen. So Hamza Makhdoom and his related info must be deleted from this religious title. Special:Contributions/39.59.51.86|39.59.51.86
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)