Deletion of SAC Vasanth

Comment: I'm seeing here a complete lack of . Subject meets  and  standard, -for "significant coverage they have received in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources", such as, -http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/tv/news/SAC-Vasanth-plans-to-do-more-laser-beam-shows/articleshow/12686659.cms, http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/nothing-short-of-magic/article2924045.ece, http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/tricks-up-his-sleeve/article6012296.ece, http://archives.chennaionline.com/Film/tv/June08/06article83.aspx, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thane/Magician-cheated-by-his-two-crew-members/articleshow/29058263.cms, http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/a-new-quiz-contest-in-town/article6514808.ece, http://searchindiannews.in/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Magician%20%22SAC%20Vasanth%22&gsc.sort= etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: and cleanup. The article was previously deleted per CSD A7, but I feel that the article does contain a credible claim of importance, per the subject having performed in several countries and per the awards he has received. Furthermore, the article does not qualify for deletion per CSD G4 because the previous deletion was not based upon a deletion discussion. Keep because the subject meets . Source examples include http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/nothing-short-of-magic/article2924045.ece, http://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/tricks-up-his-sleeve/article6012296.ece, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/tv/news/SAC-Vasanth-plans-to-do-more-laser-beam-shows/articleshow/12686659.cms
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)