Deletion of Windows XP visual styles

Comment: with "Features new to Windows XP". Hi. I understand that although Masem is not the best writer when it comes to composing xFD or NFCR, his judgment is often far more sound. In this case, the assessment of "none of the sources are secondary" is entirely wrong; 6 out of the 10 footnotes provided as of Special:Diff/613162860 are secondary sources. But the article does not establish its |notability by showing ''significant'' coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject and has unreferenced claims. Merging with "Features new to Windows XP" solves the problem. Best regards
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Nomination seems more a case of . The article includes multiple secondary sources and is the result of several similar articles being combined as well as splitting of content from Windows XP. The aim here seems to be the removal of several images that provide a visual comparison of the different visual styles. The article itself is encyclopaedic. I see no reason why it should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)