Deletion of Decade of Darkness

Comment: per  and . I believe there is an important article to be written on the historic and sweeping austerity measures taken by Chretien-Martin in the mid-1990s, including their impact on military spending, as well as all other areas of federal spending. But this article is not it, as outlined above. And I don't see much in the way of NPOV content to merge into the articles on Chretien, Martin or the Canadian military. I for one don't favour a redirect to the Hillier article (which makes no mention of this specific term, at present
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:COAT)

Comment: clearly doesn't comply with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: the subject does not appear to be notable in and of itself, and thus fails . That being said, as its primary subject is actually about the Canadian Government under Prime Minister Chretien. If it is an alternate name, the article should be replaced by a redirect, as I understand is the standard procedure
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per Ahunt; also fails #When_word_or_phrase_itself_may_be_an_encyclopedic_subject| and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NAD||WP:NOTADVOCATE)