Deletion of Michael L. Radelet

Comment: It doesn't matter what the subject thinks, it only matter whether he is notable or not (well, that and  stuff). The article doesn't seem to have BLP issues, it is hardly quality coverage, but it is on par with what we usually have (often written by the subjects themselves, or by their friends/students/etc.). The subject passes  - Google Scholar shows numerous articles by him (often co-authored, but still...) with 200+, a lot more with 100+, citations. He has a solo-authored publication in American Sociological Review, that's a flagship sociological journal. As far as works about him and his impact, there's not much (he isn't dead yet, so no obituaries, etc.) but I found {{cite book|author1=C. Ronald Huff|author2=Martin Killias|title=Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice: Causes and Remedies in North American and European Criminal Justice Systems|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8WGtUenf5mAC&pg=PA402|year=2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-0-415-53993-7|pages=402–}}: "His work on erroneous convictions... is widely credited with introducing the "innocence argument" into contemporary death penalty debates". Granted, that's from a section on contributor's biographies and it might have been written by him, but it is in a reliably-published academic book. Overall, I think he is on the notable side of notability, and that means his bio stays. If the subject thinks there are inaccuracies/bias, he should be more clear and report them on the talk page/here/help forum, and we can take a look at fixing the article. Also ping
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PROF)

Comment: Heavily-cited researcher and based on that easily clears the bar of . I'm not sure how much we should weigh the subject's preference. I tend to agree with {{u|Piotrus}} that this is more a situation where the article should be fixed than one calling for deletion. I'll leave the decision to the closing admin, my personal opinion being that this subject is clearly notable (note to {{u|Primefac}}: academics are usually notable for their work and that is what is being covered), but I don't think it would break the encyclopedia if he's not covered
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)