Deletion of Bob's Watches

Comment: It's a advertising article, which diminishes WP purpose. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: One of the fastest ways into getting an article deleted is to sock on an AfD nomination; in addition, sources largely fail . Falls well short of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:ORG)

Comment: absolutely a breach of  and the sock/meat-spam above in addition to the  arguments gives that game plan away. The suggestion that an enterprise like this gains notability from the Rolex watches they sell is a complete fallacy. That's like suggesting I'm notable because I had a Coca Cola|Coke today. One piece of local news coverage isn't anywhere near enough to satisfy . Really a bit surprised this was re-listed given the total lack of policy value from "team keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:OSE||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: A firm going about its business, but not encyclopaedic. The Orange County Register article is the nearest to a  but inclusion in a feature article is insufficient for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH)