Deletion of Catherine Masters (2nd nomination)

Comment: to an appropriate longevity list. We're seeing an awful lot of these oldest living people bio articles come up at Afd and I have to say I'm surprised we have so many. In this case, I agree  certainly applies. There is no lasting notability here. This otherwise unremarkable person lived for a long while. She got birthday greetings, etc. Other people after her will live very long lives in the UK, and congratulations to them all. But we don't need a lot of individual s on people such as this. Lists are the best way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB)

Comment: to an appropriate longevity list.  is not at all equivalent to . Perhaps reading them both would help to understand why. Distinguishing between the two ought not be difficult. This is definitely a  situation. Nothing encyclopedic appears in any of the sources.  The apology for five identical birthday cards from Prince William is cute, but hardly justifies a stand-alone bio. Deleting the article and then redirecting to an appropriate list serves the subject adequately and follows our |general notability guideline (there ain't none here) and our reqirement of  in multiple, independent |reliable sources. The only sources here fit into the exception codified by  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOPAGE||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:PERMASTUB)