Deletion of Jeff Sebo

Comment: basically per nom. Fails  (per nom) and  (only books are co-authored, and not well-reviewed); decent citations on https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Jeff+Sebo&btnG= Scholar, especially for a relatively recent PhD, but nothing to suggest #C1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)

Comment:  looks more plausible than .  {{ping|J Milburn}} you deprodded, and mentioned  at the time, specifically multiple reviews of multiple books.  Perhaps you could add them to the article?  I don't quickly find reviews that look sufficient
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: per PROF, , and . We almost never keep an ''assistant'' professor. Many professors get stuck at the lower levels of academia, myself and family members included (my domestic partner, FWIW, was an assistant clinical professor at NYU, too). I have written dozens of opinion pieces, and that does not make me notable. This person earned his doctorate less than ten years ago
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:MILL)

Comment: Thanks for the ping, {{ul|Russ Woodroofe}}. ''Food, Animals and the Environment: An Ethical Approach'' was reviewed by Trevor Hedburg in https://www.pdcnet.org/eip/content/eip_2020_0021_0001_0120_0123 ''Essays in Philosophy'' and by Kyle Johannsen in https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/pir/article/view/18944 ''Philosophy in Review''. It was also https://www.foodpolitics.com/2018/12/weekend-reading-food-animal-ethics/ blogged about by Marion Nestle, who is a major figure in food studies, while Sebo was interviewed about the arguments in the book https://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/why-the-debate-between-vegans-and-meat-eaters-is-pointless-20190312-p513hm.html in ''The Age'', which is a respected newspaper with a wide reach. This means that the book is notable (multiple independent reviews in reliable sources), which in turn means that Sebo is notable, as he "has ... played a major role in co-creating a significant ... work that has been the primary subject ... of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews", as required by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Low citation count = fails . One blog interview and some other niche mentions, fails GNG. At best, . Not notable as an academic or activist at the current time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Qualifies under , which requires multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Here are those sources, organized by topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: No pass of rof. Far oo soon. Maybe in ten years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)