Deletion of Olympic class starship

Comment: The subject has not received significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to pass . The ''Star Trek: The Next Generation Companion'', ''The Star Trek Encyclopedia'', and ''Star Trek Chronology'' are officially licensed books and therefore primary sources. In fact, the copyright page of all three books state that the copyright is owned by Paramount Pictures. Secondly, mentions of the Olympic class are very brief. The other references also doesn't provide any significant coverage and most of them are likewise owned by Paramount Pictures
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I'd call them secondary since they aren't actual cites to the TV show itself which would be the primary source material.  They are, however, all or at least mostly to the official secondary materials and thus not really independent.  I don't have an informed opinion of the Transformers articles but note that  is an argument to avoid because similarly situated articles are not necessarily identically situated.  On the other hand, certain very popular fandoms do sometimes seem to get a pass do to lots of fans voting keep at AfD.  There isn't much that can be done about it, but if we do want to equalize treatment of say Star Trek and Transformers (an another pair of similarly situated areas) I'd "vote" to equalize up rather than down.  We need better sources than DVD screen captures and action figure packaging but where we can get them we can and probably should have articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: no coverage in |reliable sources independent on the subject (which precisely excludes any work affiliated in any way with the ''Star Trek'' franchise), so the subject is not |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTE)

Comment: the ''in-universe significance'' of this ship class is absolutely irrelevant to Wikipedia. And this  class is covered in the sources given in the article, although I am unsure how these sources would be classified according to #How to meet the requirement
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THIRDPARTY)

Comment: If, as it appears, there are 22 (!) claases of starship in the Star Trek continuity, and 21 of them are (so far) uncontroversially notable, no useful purpose is served by treating the 22nd differently. From : ''In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most are notable, it serves no useful purpose to endlessly argue over the notability of a minority of these items
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)