Deletion of Ellis Watson

Comment: per the obvious notability. I note that this was nominated 2 minutes after creation, and seconded, by an editor about whom I'm fast losing my capacity to WP:assume good faith|assume good faith, 5 minutes later. How could anyone claim to have followed  in that time? Nominations like this just waste the time of editors who want to discuss articles about which there is room for discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Yet another violation of .  Coverage of this person is in-depth and independent of the topic.  Easily passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:N||WP:BIO)