Deletion of Manu Sharma (2nd nomination)

Comment: Because of the following reasons why I am totally against keeping this unsuitable article. These are my simple reasons to oppose it: 1) The fact that the subject is notable for ''only one thing''. In short, Manu Sharma is notable ''just'' for the murder and he is ''not'' a high-profile murderer. 2) The other details such as his jail life and his relation with former president (Nichalp’s wikilawering points) and all those stuffs are ''unencyclopedic'' and against our policy, . 3) The article further fails in the following guidelines too:  (note that Wikipedia is ''not a news'' source), ,  and POV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:BLP||WP:1E||WP:NPOV)

Comment: the revised version. I accept that the subject had some notoriety prior to the murder. It does appear that the subsequent trial and retrial, both significant events themselves, have an imprint in the public awareness of that community such that the spirit of  does not properly apply. The BLP aspects (as opposed to notability concerns) are to my mind less important in a case like this where there has been very public discussion of all aspects of the incident, and the worst claim (being a murderer) has been confirmed by a public verdict
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)