Deletion of Huckapoo

Comment: There are sufficient sources for the  standard, or  criterion #1. (Thanks to Vickser for finding them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I was all over the Delete vote for this one, but I don't think I can.  New York Magazine's feature profile of them is substantial, and they were profiled not just once, but twice, in the New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D00E5DE133EF93AA1575BC0A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9805E7DA113AF937A15753C1A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1 So, that's usic#1.  And then http://www.gazette.net/stories/070506/damanew165922_31942.shtml this article from a Maryland newspaper (albeit one I've never heard of) mentions that they've had several songs in rotation on Radio Disney, which would qualify them for usic#11.  As much as I'm tempted to fudge it, meeting two parts of usic means a keep from me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M||WP:M||WP:M)