Deletion of Pharmacology Weekly

Comment: wholly unsourced and offering no indication that third party sourcing may become available. In response to S Marshall's "this is an academic journal" argument, I will simply quote : "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." There is no reason to believe that "third-party sources can be found" for either of these journals, so no good reason to retain them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: for lack of |reliable secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)