Deletion of Zui quan

Comment: The problem seems to be that there's a lack of reliable, independent sources supporting the claim this is an ancient martial arts style.  Many of the article's sources are youtube videos or published by those who claim to know and teach drunken styles.  As I said at the discussion at WT:WPMA#Potential Hoax article?, I know wushu instructors who teach a drunken form to some of their better students, but I've not heard any of them claim that drunken forms make up a style, much less an ancient one.  Even the book review article from Kung Fu magazine says things like "according to legend", which is hardly proof--it's essentially heresay and insufficient to show  is met.  Zahne says that it's about the "notability of the topic, not the quality of the article", but there's a lack of independent evidence showing this even exists as "an ancient style and its origins are mainly traced back to the famous Buddhist and Daoist sects".  I think the fact that the Chinese WP article on this topic has no sources and is considered to be of questionable authenticity is telling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)