Deletion of Windows Media Encoder

Comment: The article definitely needs to be improved, but significant coverage in reliable secondary sources does exist and thus the article has #Why_deletion_of_articles_with_potential_should_be_avoided|potential.  A http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Windows+Media+Encoder%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&tbo=1&tbm=bks Google Books search returned multiple results that appear reliable, including a http://books.google.com/books?id=2ndPnAos2-8C&pg=PA58 review published in PC Magazine.  I would also note that this software appears to have been more popular about a decade ago than it is currently, so recommended places to look for additional sources with significant coverage are computer magazines and books from the late 90s / early 2000s
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL)