Deletion of Konstantine Konopisos

Comment: while his rank arguable satisfies #2 of  that is just an essay and he lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to satisfy , totally non-notable life
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . We can verify he was a rear admiral when he died, but not when he was in active duty service
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: regardless of  it is |consensus that flag rank officers are notable for being flag rank officers. ''That said'', the ''https://www.google.com/books/edition/Register_of_Retired_Commissioned_and_War/doOUmxsdWNkC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Konstantine+Konopisos+Radm&pg=PA411&printsec=frontcover Register of Retired Commissioned and Warrant Officers'' from 1978 lists Konopisos as having retired as a ''Captain'' in April 1975, and https://www.google.com/books/edition/Register_of_Retired_Commissioned_and_War/urAtgcbL__8C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Konstantine+Konopisos+Radm&pg=PA405&printsec=frontcover the 1984 edition has the same information. Why his tombstone (pictured on the findagrave 'reference') states RADM is confusing (perhaps it was one of those "advance one grade on death" deals?) but he can only be |verified as having been a captain and, thus, defaults to GNG; a GBooks search turns up a number of y UFO titles but the ones that are searchable don't even mention him, and the only Google hits are mirrors of either Wikipedia or Findagrave, thus comprehensively failing it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ONLYESSAY||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:V||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Without a source to show he was actually a Rear Admiral, its as good as nothing, anyone can claim to be anything. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)