Deletion of Biotech industry in Boston

Comment: Important tech topic that meet  by decent coverage in reliable sources http://www.businessinsider.com/whats-bostons-biotech-secret-sauce-2017-5 Business Insider, https://www.economist.com/news/business/21688385-bostons-biotech-hub-surviving-challenge-silicon-valley-clusterluck The Economist. And the article has even more, including sources from ''Nature (journal)|Nature'' which all discuss the topic directly. I agree it needs to be renamed to use formal term " Biotechnology" instead of informal "Biotech" but that's not issue of AfD, it would be done later
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: First, if an article subject has potential to include more information, it doesn't need to be deleted. It can be improved. That's why we don't delete every stub article. Second, , says "Lists which contain internally linked terms (i.e., wikilinks) serve, in aggregate, as natural tables of contents and indexes of Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PURPLIST)