Deletion of Danny Boy Styles

Comment: per |DEL8 as lacking notability. Despite the shouting above, the sources given in the article and those I found with the {{tl|find sources}} links don't add up to significant coverage in reliable, independent sources as required for GNG. I see no indication that any of the additional, specific BIO or MUSICBIO criteria apply in this case either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL8)

Comment: Jiggamafu, you are missing the point. You say that the references "provide sufficient information regarding the topic of discussion". The topic of discussion is Danny Boy Styles – however the first ''Billboard'' reference and the ''Forbes'' reference do not mention him at all, so no, they don't provide any information whatsoever regarding the topic of discussion. And the Gigwise and second ''Billboard'' reference are passing mentions in articles that focus on entirely different topics. That is what JJMC89 is getting at. All those references you mention simply provide notability for the MIMS and Weeknd records, not for Styles himself – the fact those records reached number one does not necessarily make Styles notable: see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)