Deletion of 1080i

Comment: When I was creating this deletion discussion I was also thinking about  because of how undersourced the article is and the possibility of |OR being in it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:OR)

Comment: Note that this article has had 60,000 pageviews over the past 30 days. I think this qualifies for |SNOW; AfD is not the forum to ask for an article merge
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Article is obviously notable. I've seen it many times with my electronic devices. |Deletion is not cleanup; we don't delete just because an article doesn't have references (unless in specific cases like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:BLPPROD)

Comment: and . Nom seems to have failed to do . A simple Google search shows enough coverage in the first page to satisfy . AfDs are not meant to improve article quality, they are to gain consensus on whether an article's subject is or is not notable, and this one clearly is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (:WP:SNOW||:WP:BEFORE||:WP:GNG)