Deletion of Jane Glazebrook

Comment: per #C1. To PWilkinson's detailed explanation I would add that one of the top two papers is singly-authored by her. (It's in a review journal rather than original research, but still I think that should be enough to show that her individual contributions are significant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Probably more accurate to say that most professors write rather than that all do - but the important thing in this case is that, at least according to Google Scholar, two papers she has been involved in writing (including one of which she was sole author) have been cited over 1,000 times and 30 have been cited over 100 times. We standardly reckon that this level of citation represents a clear pass of #1. The article could certainly do with some rewriting (it is odd, for example, that given the numbers quoted in the last sentence, the first of the subject's publications listed in the article is apparently a recent one that has so far been cited only 11 times), but this is not in itself a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)