Deletion of Asymptotic Decider

Comment: Per  and an apparent lack of a source search per section D of . The nomination states that no sources were found. However, one reliable source already existed in the article ''prior'' to the nomination! Source examples include: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=949621 The asymptotic decider: resolving the ambiguity in marching cubes, http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical_bjkjdxxb-e200503002.aspx Application of marching cubes algorithm in visualization of mineral deposits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Per  2e "''nominations which are so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question''". This is because the nomination says that no sources were found when the article already contains a source. That paper by Nielson and Hamann is cited in numerous books as you can readily see by checking the link above. The nominator seems to have made this nomination as part of a spree in which the facts of each case are not being checked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: and  to the nom. Bad-faith nomination, with dozens of reliable book and journal sources existing. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.74.22|202.124.74.22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)