Deletion of Dim Effect (2nd nomination)

Comment: at first reading, I thought the "dim effect" was nature evolving into something that was represented in art beforehand; this already has all redflags for . But actually it is about natural features being discovered after their artistic representation. Well, pareidolia and Littlewood's law jump to mind, and in any case it is not "nature mimicking art" for causality reasons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: This phrase is essentially unique to Ratcliffe's rhinoceros beetle paper; even the scant few papers that cited it don't appear to have cared about the observed similarity between a real insect and a Pixar character. The other references don't use the phrase (and not all of them even make the art-to-nature connection explicitly). Essentially, this article rests at the intersection of , , and simply --even if it did find its way into publication in a peer-reviewed journal about beetles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:MADEUP)