Deletion of Ringdocus

Comment: Not seeing any sources that strike me as , i.e. not a single analysis by any proper scholar. Just popular science (with the science in question being cryptozoology, or if you feel generous, urban legend/folklore studies). The latter would be RS if the authors/publishers were reliable, but I don't think they are. Ping me if you want to argue otherwise and would like me to reconsider my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)