Deletion of Stan Helsing

Comment: I've added the ''Variety'' review as a ref for the production/distribution info (which BTW is not correct, this is in fact a Canada-US coproduction: imagine my pride!). Anyway, while ''Variety'' makes clear the lacklustre nature of this film, it does seem to have the  to merit retaining, when combined with the ''NY Post'', ''Hollywood Reporter'' and ''Globe and Mail'' refs linked to above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: ndash; fails  … it was just released last week, so maybe in a few weeks/months it will have sufficient notability, but righyt now, it feels like . &mdash; Special:Contributions/138.88.125.101|138.88.125.101
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FILMNOT||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Passes .  Five reviews from Rotten Tomatoes "top critics": http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/movies/stan_helsing_wSzW3LhuR8qOj4X3X5WrgJ, http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/movies/23stan.html?partner=Rotten%20Tomatoes&ei=5083, http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117941443.html?categoryid=31&cs=1, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/stan-helsing-film-revew-1004029723.story, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/stan-helsing/article1334098/. A non-archive search of GNews turns up http://news.google.com/news?q=Stan+Helsing a bit more coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)