Deletion of Voter Integrity Fund

Comment: nbsp;no sign of actual notability; if there should be significant and sustained media coverage about this, an article can be created in six months or a year or whenever, but at the moment &nbsp;is not met, and &nbsp;would also seem to apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Based on the sourcing available, appears to fail . I agree with the recentism concerns as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: In nominating articles for deletion,  guidelines should control.  The political opinions and assertions of individual users is moot and irrelevant when it comes to determining whether an article satisfies Wikipedia guidelines or not. That said, it seems questionable to me whether this article currently meets  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: per . We don't publish Wikipedia articles about things we think may become notable, and the coverage in RS is far insufficient at the current moment. As for the comment that {{tq|Trump's claims are not baseless if there actually is fraud}}, my claims that there are little green men piloting a very convincing Trump mech-suit are not baseless if that's actually the case, but we certainly don't write articles about it, even if I promise to provide proof of the claim at some later date
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)