Deletion of Seth Bringman

Comment: since when is BuzzFeed's politics reporting not a reliable source? Completely disagree. Some of the best known American political reporters work for BuzzFeed (you are perhaps confusing their viral content work with their political reporting). Anyways, there's plenty of coverage of Bringman in other sources as well (these are a selection, there's more when you searched): http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ex-clinton-super-pac-official-publish-insider-account, http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/former-clinton-backer-switches-team-sanders, http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/17/job-at-hillary-clintons-super-pac-didnt-assure-a-campaign-post/, http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/06/cnn-reporter-who-scored-first-hillary-interview-attended-clinton-aides-wedding-two-weeks-ago/, http://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/hillary-clinton-pac-staffs-up#.xtYRDKnx4, http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/10/hillary_clinton_trolls_john_ka.html, http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/2015/01/30/Close-Quarters. More than enough in my opinion to establish notability and meet  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: Apparently, I need to format my response like this -- something |I did not know when Bearcat listed the article for deletion in my first week on the site -- so here it is. This discussion has turned into a proxy debate over BuzzFeed's ability to serve as a reliable source, even when the article is written by their news division by a well-known political reporter with editorial oversight, despite the fact that the story now has quite a few other sources (with more on the way). Bringman is notable and this article should be kept and improved.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: There seems to be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_188#Buzzfeed.2C_Mother_Jones_for_BLP.27s. consensus that BuzzFeed articles ''can'' be reliable (so long as they aren't the run-of-the-mill clickbait type), and if that's the case, then this article passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)