Deletion of Bio-Armour (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and .  The article has no references, and I couldn't find any |independent sources discussing bio-armour.  While there are plenty of cartoon and fictional accounts of biological-based protection, the term "bio-armour" is not used
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP||WP:IS)

Comment: how did this  MADEUP WAYTOOSOON ESSAY survive six years? Bizarre. There was no substance to it at the start, and there's none now. No citations; no real technology or research to support it; not even a real dictionary entry; just wishful dreaming based on sci-fi: "will theoretically be able to self-repair" (9 May 2006, still there today). No it won't. Quickly now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)