Deletion of Renaissance Capital (US company)

Comment: Passes . LA Times does not look like a press release
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: About half an hour after the above comment I added a feature article at ''BusinessWeek'' from 1998. The article goes into considerable detail vis-a-vis the company, its background, founders, operations, etc., and establishes its notability per . There's nothing "nigh well impossible" about searching for information relating to the company on the internet. What there is is some difficulty on account of Russia's largest private investment bank having the same name; but coming up with irrelevant search results is easily avoided by, for example, adding the name of one of the founders to the search query. Meanwhile, Kathleen Shelton represented Renaissance Capital before a U.S. Senate hearing just a couple of months ago: http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Testimony&Hearing_ID=491a85df-6940-4074-8b6e-934617c1b292&Witness_ID=9c949c4a-976e-427c-b405-894164c7e5de "Testimony of Ms. Kathleen Shelton Smith"; Renaissance employees are frequent guests on ''Bloomberg'' as IPO experts, including Facebook's mega-IPO: search YouTube for "renaissance capital" + ipo; Nasdaq.com cites Renaissance for information on IPOs all the time, as do ''Reuters'' and plenty of other RSes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: LA Times is  (and pretty short too) and nothing else comes close to indepth and independent. If new  are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:RS)