Deletion of Krista Donnenwirth

Comment: I dislike how OTRS does nominations like this – most of the time it is not so much that the subject wants the article deleted as it is that they don't like that the article (in this case, a section of the article) portrays them in a negative light. It's pretty obvious from the history that the 'DUI incident' is what the subject doesn't want in the article, but seeing as it's sourced to the ''The Arizona Republic'' (apparently the 10th largest US paper by circulation) and is written in a NPOV tone, I don't see why it shouldn't be in the article. On to the actual issue of whether Donnenwirth's |notable or not, the article doesn't display it well (all bar one source is non-independent), but a quick gnews search shows that she easily meets the |general notability guideline. Some examples of significant coverage include
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: I see very few problems with the article;it is included in many Wikiprojects,only thing missing is that the author did not comply with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)