Deletion of Irexit

Comment: Reads as wp:CRYSTAL and  to me. There is no cited material in the article to suggest that anyone notable is actually doing the proposing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: that we have parallel articles Dutch withdrawal from the European Union, Greek withdrawal from the eurozone and Frexit dealing with a mooted French withdrawal.   does not prohibit mention of parallel articles.   Such articles exist even though ideas like Partition and secession in California may never go anywhere, because the secession discussions are inherently notable, and in the specific case of Ireland, good sources exist.  On the quesiton of the best name for the article, we can punt to the article's talk page.  It is the topic itself that is notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Decently sourced. Not an entirely new concept in the EU.  doesn't apply as this is quite feasible
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)