Deletion of James Eagan Holmes (2nd nomination)

Comment: per : "The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: Same as before. This passes  easily, as it fails the second and third prongs of the deletion test. The execution of the crime is unusual, and relevant to Gun politics in the United States and other mass shooting perpetrators in the united states like Seung-Hui Cho. No one likes "turning murderers like him into infamous celebrities" as Gaijin42 said, but that's not strictly relavent. More details about Holmes will emerge as the trial progresses. He is currently kept in solitary, which is normal protocol for "high profile suspects
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This meets  in spades: "the execution of the crime is unusual". Hello? He went to a movie screening through an emergency door, was wearing full body armor, and used gas canisters. And ''then'' he shot 70 people. As for sustained coverage, of course most of the focus was at the time of, but he still has gotten plenty of coverage in the http://www.google.com/#q=james+eagan+holmes&hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:m&sa=X&ei=VZjaUIDoI9CWqwHGl4C4Dg&ved=0CCAQpwUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.aWM&fp=fb67b496fb49c463&bpcl=40096503&biw=1366&bih=705 last 30 days
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)