Deletion of Scott M. Sipprelle (2nd nomination)

Comment: On reflection and more reading of the sources, I conclude that coverage is sufficient to meet the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject met  guidelines the first time this came to AFD for his business activities. Because he already met the general notability requirements for reasons unrelated to the redirect target proposed earlier, a redirect would be completely inappropriate in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There seem to be a string of these AfD which appear to be in bad faith. The nominators are selecting the challengers in the races and saying they don't meet , yet they don't nominate the incumbent's article. Not to mention the timing is a pretty strong indicator of the bad faith
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)