Deletion of Gina Din

Comment: Much cruft obviously (removed as of July 30 2015); while a self-promoter type, she appears well-connected in Africa, with enough coverage to meet the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Gina Din '''is''' notable, looking up her on Google finds that she is somewhat known (as Tomwsulcer points out above). Right now, the article fails |Wikipedia's verifability policy, but the Red Cross award and many of the awards she was given are notable which would pass . Will vote '''keep''' or '''delete''' if notable sources are added
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: None of the sources, near as I can tell, are |reliable sources by our definition. If the subject is notable, surely there are articles somewhere that would indicate that? She does exist, and that's good as far as it goes, but there needs to be more there there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)