Deletion of List of Philippine presidential trivia

Comment: WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, |trivia sections are to be avoided. This is just an bloated trivia section
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:AVTRIV)

Comment: potentially interesting/useful information (e.g., length of term, longevity, etc., but not births) into individual presidential articles (perhaps a "Trivia" section for each), then delete.  Although I think the article should go per #IINFO, the information it contains is very well-referenced and some of it is relevant to the individual biographical articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: truly #INDISCRIMINATE|indiscriminate CRUFT, CRUFT, CRUFT, BABY. This really is indiscriminate in the truest sense of the word: just a collection of random facts. We are not here to publicise useless trivia. Put what has any encyclopedic significance whatsoever into the individual articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: It recreates information already in other articles and does violate  as constituted. Note that '''merge is not necessary''' because there are already tons of lists with length of term, longetivity, etc. in the Philippine presidential lists category. Some of these are separately being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Philippine Presidents by middle name, however, so that should be taken into account. Note that this is not meant to solicit votes for the other AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: How about United States Presidential trivia? If this Philippine Presidential trivia article is useless, then US Presidential trivias is too. Why not include it if you really think that list trivias can't constitute a good article. Some trivias aren't too emphasized actually. By the way, what part of #IINFO makes the article qualified for deletion? Is this a '''Lists of Frequently Asked Questions''', '''Travel guides''', '''Memorials''', '''Instruction manuals''', '''Internet guides''', '''Textbooks and annotated texts''', '''Plot summaries''', '''Lyrics databases''' or maybe '''Things made up in school one day'''? Which is which
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: the more interesting content could be merged to President of the Philippines; most of the rest is unnecessary listcruft (e.g. which building each president was inaugurated in). A clear case of  an indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)