Deletion of People's Republic of South Yorkshire

Comment: I would like to hear more discussion about how this term relates to ; in particular, the part that says "''To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term.''". Editors should also be aware of using invalid arguments like  and ot notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICT||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:N)

Comment: to South Yorkshire: Well, since you ask, the article is not exactly a dictionary definition (ict) of a colloquialism, as it provides some history and politics, with reasonable sources for the usage. However, it does feel too slight for an article, given that the subject is a jokey term for the South Yorkshire area (perhaps that's what people mean when they talk about unencyclopaedic), and people evidently feel a bit uncomfortable about notability, however many sources there are. I'd suggest that a merge to South Yorkshire would be best; the history, politics and indeed witty use of language in northern England would all go toward enriching that article (as a section casting an interesting sidelight), leaving a redirect here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)