Deletion of Charles Cooper Nott, Jr. (2nd nomination)

Comment: State" judge or not, the individual meets notability through ... and for someone born in 1869, that works for me. Stub needs expansion per available sources.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Charles+Cooper+Nott%2C+Jr.%22http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Charles+Cooper+Nott%2C+Jr.%22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails ; I cannot see how he is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per . The NYT obit is in-depth coverage, the other three NYT articles much less so, but probably adds up to enough. As an aside, I would argue that historical subjects are at a disadvantage in finding coverage compared to modern people. The encyclopedia is richer by the inclusion of biographies of those who may have been just as notable in their day as our current celebrities (for whom there is little problem in finding press coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: doesn't seem to meet , and none of the more specific sets of criteria seem to apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)