Deletion of Barbados–Germany relations

Comment: as I can read that sources for the article specifically deal with the Barbados-Germany relationship. If the relationship exists and is coverered in depth and in reliable sources, its a keeper per . There is enough to suport this article so that the informations need not be lost inside other articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this almanacic article due to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barbados%E2%80%93Germany_relations&diff=301124114&oldid=300353098 yet another impressive rescue effort for this sort of article by Richard Arthur Norton.  Article clearly meets  now.  Good job!  That is what we all like to see.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: beyond the sole fact that relations exist (which can and doubtless is covered in the apposite articles), the recent expansion is trivial and fictitious. Trivial in that it accords attention to details (eg, the "Agreement between the Government of Barbados and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany for the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments" - well, it ''sounds'' important, at least) we would not bother mentioning outside "rescue" efforts done on this series of nonsense articles, just because we can (see  for that); fictitious in that no, the actions of Barbadian men in the Imperial British Army, well before Barbadian independence in 1966, ''is not'' a function of "Barbados–Germany relations", and ''is not'' a manifestation of "historical ties", no matter how desperately some may wish to portray them that way. That history is probably notable, but you mention it at (the rather wretched) History of Barbados, at (the equally bad) Military of Barbados (where, by contrast, an ''avant la lettre'' section ''is'' appropriate), at Military history of  the British West Indies during World War II, but not here, for reasons that should be obvious
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: In a good faith effort to save this article, it has become polluted by a lot of off topic and/or very questionably relevant content. For example: "In 1874 the German bark Pierre Buyper was wrecked on the coast of Barbados", "In 2006 Germany won the World Cup in men's golf in Barbados", etc. If you ignore all that, you're left with very little relevant material. And none the cited sources (or at least those that are independent of the governments of Barbados and Germany) actually address the topic of "Barbados–Germany relations" directly or in detail. Therefore, this topic fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)