Deletion of OpenPsion

Comment: I'm seeing a problem here, in that the people who want to keep this article are not recognizing why their arguments are not convincing. There is no bad faith here, since the nominator is quite rightly concerned that there are many minor Linux distributions with articles on Wikipedia. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia isn't Distrowatch. Not every Linux distro gets a page no questions ask. The fact is, this article has no third-party sources, no establishment of actual notability as per . I'm sure many of the users of this distro who have spoken here think the distro is useful to them, but if nobody else has noticed, is it really that important? Perhaps not. And really, accusing a person of bad faith in a case like this? It's not going to strengthen your argument, it's just going to convince me that you don't even realize you don't have that much of one. Seriously, the best way to get an article kept is to provide real sources, not to say the nominator is in bad faith when that's not clearly so at all. There are cases where it is a problem, certainly. This isn't one of them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: As per Bdushaw. I seem to find bad faith nominators as |uncivilized. This article needs to be cleaned up though. It's still |notable and |Wikipedia's Bots doesn't have to do with removing links
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL||WP:NOTE||WP:BOTS)

Comment: I am, actually, a bit confused by the arguments given above. By common consensus, Wikipedia is not meant to describe everything that is |interesting or |useful. It is meant to cover everything that is |notable. The |notability criteria specify what "notability" means in this context: There must be Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent sources which cover the topic. That might be press coverage (press, not blogs), or books describing this software in detail, or similar. Unless such sources are provided, the topic just fails the criteria. Don't take this as a personal attack: That's the way we deal with all topics here. Currently, I don't see that OpenPsion is notable; maybe it will be one day, and then it deserves an article. By the way, Bdushaw, your comments above suggest that you are one of the authors of the software. In this case, you may have a |conflict of interest, and should be very careful about editing the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL||WP:N||WP:N||WP:COI)

Comment: The arguments for ''keep''ing are all based on substituting a |''kewlness'' for ''notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)