Deletion of MechQuest

Comment: Agree with nom, although I believe that the game hasn't even been released yet and is still in the final stages of testing, so  would apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Notable developer/producer, ''will'' have enough secondary media coverage once it's out. We can have a stub sized article like we do with every highly anticipated game. I rewrote the article to comply with  - the above editors are encouraged to review their opinions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: Still haven't seen any Keep votes that amount to more than . If it's really |notable, there will be significant coverage on it in reliable secondary sources. If such coverage does not exist, then it's not notable. The burden is on those who wish to keep to find those sources (though I've tried, too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:N)

Comment: How about this - the persistence and popularity (in terms of contributions from many editors) of this entry and many, many others like it, in the face of rigorous examination from AfDs and the cruft crusade, demonstrates an evolving consensus as to what constitutes an acceptable standard of entry for Wikipedia. I'm not attempting to  anything in here, rather I'm pointing to how recedents|precedent from previous AfDs and existing editor practice suggests a more permissive standard of notability than is currently codified in written policy. As to written policy, I refer to olicy itself, which quite reasonably explains that policy is primarily the result of "codification of current convention and common practice that already have wide consensus... ''The easiest way to change policy is to change common practice first''" (emphasis mine). In other words, policy (such as ) follows practice, not the other way around. And the consensus common practice seems to be that entries which ambiguously meet  yet can be constrained to verifiable information are acceptable. The article will meet this standard once it's cleaned up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:P||WP:P||WP:N||WP:N)