Deletion of Lil Buddha

Comment: per nomination, since subject lacks independent notability. The needed sources are simply not there. |Wikipedia is not a collection of haphazardly thrown together, random information. Let's gracefully wish that this is a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I was a little puzzled by the way that it seems that the draft and the article were histmerged.  I agree that taking this to AFD is what I recommend in my essay on epeated Draftification|Repeated Draftification.  There may be unusual situations in which an article may reasonably be draftified twice, but normally a second draftification is just move-warring.  I don't entirely understand why some experienced editors think that AFD is so bad that move-warring is a less disruptive alternative
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: Just in a simple  I managed to find https://asianews.network/2019/10/29/artists-decry-the-growing-tendency-to-arrest-musicians-for-their-lyrical-content-as-autocratic-censorship/ https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/city-in-music-kathmandu-1-6727566 https://kathmandutribune.com/the-10-best-new-nepali-rap-songs-right-now/ some decent English-language coverage suggesting that he is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Agree that its a bit . I added some independent references which should qualify it for a '''keep'''. Not intersted in modifying to improve the article though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)