Deletion of Examination of Holocaust denial

Comment: This article is Original Research and POV.  The nature of this article wishes to argue something, and is mostly argument with some sparse quotes.  According to , "an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source"  is Original Research and is not encyclopedic, thus must be removed.  So must POV.  Even if there is POV on other related cites, that doesnt justify creating more POV to balance it out.  Rather, introduce the relevant information in the relevant objective article and change the prose so that it reflects a neutral view point that wishes to present all the facts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This article is better written than 90% of the articles on Wikipedia, and contains vast amounts of valuable information. While it doesn't make use of proper Wikipedia inline citations, that is easily remedied. I noticed that it uses Lipstadt's book on Holocaust denial as a reference, a book that I happen to own. If the consensus is to keep, I will gladly spend a few days properly wikifying the article. As to the claims above of , I must respectfully disagree. I know a lot about this subject, and everything I read in this article I have also heard or read elsewhere. In closing, I would like to add that Holocaust denial is a longstanding concern of mine. I think it is vitally important for this project to provide articles that debunk this movement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Though remnants of the holocaust are touching, Wikipedia is not a place to posit evidence for and against this subject. Remember to stay |neutral
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)