Deletion of Valentine Richmond History Center

Comment: this AfD is preposterous. I googled "Mann Valentine Museum" and got hits from independent sources such as http://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/richmond/WickhamValentine.htm National Park Service, http://www.virginia.org/Listings/Museums/TheValentine/ The Official Virginia tourism website, http://arts.vcu.edu/studentinfo/2014/01/09/paid-summer-internships-at-the-valentine-museum-deadline-3314/ Virginia Commonwealth University, http://richmondfamilymagazine.com/article/valentine-richmond-history-center-little-history-please/ Richmond Family Magazine, http://richmondmagazine.com/news/valentines-meat-juice-02-20-2009/ Richmond Magazine ... So notability is established: The Valentine is not only a National Historic Landmark, it was the first museum in Richmond. http://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/richmond/WickhamValentine.htm source: National Park Service ... OP also said "we would need to delete everything not cited to a reliable secondary source, meaning the entire page." How about following wiki process and putting cite tags on things that are "doubtful but not harmful" per . EDITED TO ADD: I took the liberty of adding refs to the article, so basically this AfD has no basis whatsoever. Peace
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:NOCITE)

Comment: article clearly demonstrates notability '''NOW''',  something it had not done for the 8.5 years since its creation.  Sometimes articles subject to  just need a little prodding to bring them up to standard. Thanks to CorporateM for taking this on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)