Deletion of Hate week

Comment: It was easy to find sources to . Too easy. The hard part is sorting through them and writing all of it up. I took a stab at having at least SOMETHING to assert notability. But we can most certainly do better
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:verify notability)

Comment: The topic is particularly notable, being discussed in detail in reliable sources. It should be kept for improvement in accordance with our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: With regard to Sadads's citation of the Wikipedia:Notability_(fiction)|proposed fiction notability guidelines, one must consider what is written in the paragraphs immediately preceding those three numbered criteria, specifically: " Before proposing that an article is to be |deleted, it is important to not just consider whether the existing article meets these inclusion criteria, but whether it's subject has the ''|potential'' to do so. All Wikipedia articles are |unfinished, and an article can be notable if sources exist but have not yet been used in the article. ... These criteria are not exhaustive, nor universally agreed upon, but are a guide to how to best organise content" The Two Minutes Hate is a key thematic element in the novel 1984 as it typifies the nature of the control of both thoughts and actions which the dystopian state exerts on its denizens. This level of control and its effects on society is the entire rhetorical point of the novel; the Two Minutes Hate is used as a shorthand, just like Big Brother, in both quotidian and academic writing to allude to this. That is in addition to the notion of the Two Minutes Hate being relevant in academic discussions of dystopic literature. For examples, see http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=%22two+minutes+hate%22|this google scholar search
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:POTENTIAL||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: There is nothing in either article to indicate these are . There are inline citations. There are books discussing this exact subject, using this exact term, which is from classic literature, yet has its moments in popular culture.  Is the problem the type of references?  I know the books exist.  I know that they discuss this exact term in detail. I know they originate from classic literature. However, I do not have access to the exact books, nor do I plan to visit the library anytime soon. As such, I believe we must assume good faith, and keep these articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)