Deletion of Dragon Wing (ship)

Comment: Requires a secondary source with 'Out-of-universe' material to justify separate article per . Merge what? per nom, it isn't important to the plot summary outside the mentioning it already has
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: as stated above. I think this is not important enough to merit its own article, in accordance with . Without a doubt it deserves its own article on the Inheritance Wiki, but definitely not here. If it does get moved into another article the content will need to be seriously refined because of its length, but what is actually written is not terrible
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: to the article about the bookEldest after paring down considerably the original research in the article. A ship mentioned in a book does not need its own article if it has not attained enough notability for independent reliable sources to write about it. Counterbalancing this adherance to  is the notion that if a group of editors create a project, then everything they create is notable. There is a project to create articles for just about everything mentioned in this fantasy trilogy
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)