Deletion of Island View Residential Treatment Center

Comment: Wikipedia should not be hosting articles that are backed up by blogs. There are multiple opinion sources that lack investigative impartial process. This does not meet the  standards.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/96.81.7.171|96.81.7.171
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Island view is not notable as you can see all the references are self-published or with passing mentions or unreliable.This does not agree with . I agree with the previous two comments for deletion.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/66.212.128.180|66.212.128.180
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly notable per  and , with significant coverage online in .  For some reason, the nominator has pasted their previous objections to the cited references, including ''"Ref#12 not available."'', despite the fact that I fixed that broken link during the discussion at rticles for deletion/Elevations Residential Treatment Center, and http://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/news/ci_7166739 that repaired link already cited is significant coverage in the :Salt Lake Tribune. Other  online showing notability include :Deseret Newshttps://www.deseretnews.com/article/865595153/Family-sues-Dr-Phil-Utah-treatment-center.html, another :Salt Lake Tribunehttp://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=57978204&itype=CMSID, :Slate (magazine)http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/08/24/the_huffington_post_publishes_a_horrifying_piece_about_troubled_teen_residential.html, :Salon (website)https://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/dark_side_of_a_bain_success
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:RS||WP:A||WP:RS)

Comment: No point in merging in Elevations, which seems to be merely an ad for that place.  Island View was another fly-by-night treatment center lacking notability.  Fails at  big-time.  Special:Contributions/198.81.129.195|198.81.129.195
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not notable and does not satisfy . The references are quite obviously self published, blogs. http://www.restoretroubledteens.com/FeedItem/Island-View-RTC-Closes-Their-Doors/ This is an obvious Press Release. The article does not satisfy  to have an article on the perpetrator. As  says "Where there are no appropriate existing articles ...on the event of the crime..., the criminal or victim in question should be the subject of a Wikipedia article '''only''' if one of the following applies:". Both items noted for perpetrators are not satisfied. That leaves the article to have to be notable as a business. The business isn't notable.--Special:Contributions/103.255.7.2|103.255.7.2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRIME)

Comment: per {{u|The Mighty Glen}} above. Article meets  and, after merge, contains a decent volume of content as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)