Deletion of Hardened Gentoo

Comment: Speedy keep''' I do see references to hardened Gentoo and suggest nominator may not have performed full and proper .  Article has recently been subjected to disruptive editing by various IP's and on balance of probabilities these are not independent of each other or the nominator; and a user of good standing would likely have been blocked before this nomination.  There is potential for improving the article or perhaps a merge if someone is willing to put the effort in to do it but difficult in the context of the immediate recent history.  That the article needs improvement, and probably has significant inaccuracies, in almost certain in my opinion, and I've added a disputed template on th article page and a warning on talk to get it sorted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)