Deletion of Roy Gordon Lawrence

Comment: Needs some NPOVing as noted above, including axing a several-hundred-word paragraph.  Appears substantially documented, but I haven't dug into whether effects and reporting were widespread, whether the case had important influence on broader investigations, and so forth.  "Category:Protestant pastor pedophiles" is neither a reason to keep nor a reason to delete, and we should try to keep our own POV's out of the question.  ?  mportance?  (During edit conflict, changed leaning-vote per Master Jay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:I)

Comment: Per , nobody except the Wikipedia owns an article once it's submitted.  If you've correctly characterized the article's author, he'll have to accept the community's NPOVing cuts, or persuade editors that his alternative edits would meet Wikipedia:List of policies|all WP policies.  ... However, if by capitalized "Author" you meant YHWH, the Father in the Christian Trinity, then I'm not prepared for "a bit of a battleground with the Author" unless He can post to the WP talk pages
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)