Deletion of List of events at T-Mobile Arena

Comment: as article creator. Doesn't fit the description of , and the fact that an article will grow over time is not a reason for deletion. This is encyclopedic information, as evidenced by the fact that 1) Fully 25% of the entries in the list are standalone notable (all the articles in :Category:T-Mobile Arena) and 2) of the rest of the entries, almost all of them are already listed elsewhere in the encyclopedia (such as at the articles about the various concert tours). This list simply takes encyclopedic, reliably sourced information and groups it by an obvious attribute  (location). Also, see Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 46#List of events by place|this discussion, where there was no consensus for the notion that such lists are not encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: per : "mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable." Are these "major events"? Not in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: Unlike some, similar, articles this article is clearly laid out and extremely well referenced.  I fail to understand why the nominator feels that such lists would be acceptable for single purpose venues such as List of events at Soldier Field|Soldier Field and List of events at Wrigley Field|Wrigley Field, but not a multipurpose venue, such as this.The partial quotation from   cited above relates to broadcasters, not venues, and reads in full: "For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable."There is '''no''' specific advice under  for venues. If we try to consider a parallel interpretation, then the "upcoming events" should probably be removed, but the rest of the list is a clear parallel to "historically significant program lists" so should be retained. IMHO  would need major clarification/expansion before it could be used to support such a deletion and, any policy/guideline review should consider the entire group of articles, not pick off individual articles one at a time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTDIR)