Deletion of Izabela Wagner

Comment: per , as noted above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: As said already,  is what we need to look at, rather than  in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:NPROF)

Comment: As others have said before me, more than enough reviews of more than enough books to meet . Whether or not she meets  is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)

Comment: Three published books with multiple published reviews each is a pass of  and (because the reviews provide multiple in-depth reliable sourcss about her work) of . Her rank is mis-stated in the nomination (she's associate, not assistant) but that's largely irrelevant; it's her accomplishments, not her rank, that would make her notable. Because she's in a book-based field rather than a journal-based field, citation counts and h-index are also largely irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: Significant author with published works. Meets criteria for  and is interesting / remarkable enough to be of note. A keeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)