Deletion of Samples of sans serif typefaces

Comment: with List of typefaces. Per everybody above, the images are no doubt useful to some Wikipedia readers, but  (though not entirely on point in this case) is against pages that are primarily a collection of images. There are, though, well established criteria for building and maintaining list articles. Whether the six "sample" pages and the list should be combined into one page or several is another question worth discussing, but it is beyond the scope of AfD
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: No prose, no sources. Both of these can and should be added to the list. Under , the lists do seem to be a valuable information source. If these type of lists are limited to covering only those items listed in :Category:Typefaces by style, I don't think there would be too much resistance. However, I think the entrenched  removal of no references templates as purportedly justified by Wikipedia_talk:Typeface_list_collaboration#Samples_of_script_typefaces indicates it's time to delete and restart with new editors who are willing to develop these lists per Wikipedia:Core content policies. When you post something like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:OWN)