Deletion of Mimi Macpherson (2nd nomination)

Comment: obviously and clearly notable, well-documented in dozens of reliable sources. Does she have a famous sister? Yes. Does that mean she cannot be notable in her own right? No, of course not - Emily Bronte is not only notable because of Charlotte Bronte|Charlotte. She owned a multi-million-dollar enterprise for which she won multiple awards. She was featured on the cover of two magazines, including one in which she was named a top young Australian businesswoman. She was named national businesswoman of the year by a national organization. She has been the "face" of two companies, and has  acted as a spokewoman for several more. She has appeared in multiple television shows. She is a radio and television personality. She is frequently sought out for quotes on environmental issues, and has lobbied extensively on the topic. The article is well-sourced and balanced, and the subject clearly passes , as demonstrated by the coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as I said in the previous AFD which resulted in deletion, this fails ; and I completely agree with Jimbo that Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Presumption_in_favor_of_privacy|WP:BLP#Presumptino in favor of privacy applies here; and we should definitely avoid further vicitimization of the subject, especially considering that the notability here "stems largely or entirely from being victims of another's actions" and per  #Family
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO)

Comment: Public figure, arguably a household name in Australia. Sources in the article demonstrate that the subject clearly meets the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Enough sources in the article to demonstrate she passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)