Deletion of Freshman-Sophomore College

Comment: as failing 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: would we consider the sources from The Stanford Daily, a student run paper from the university itself, to be sufficiently independent enough to qualify as  in this case?  My gut feeling would be ''no'', but I'm happy to be corrected by someone with more detailed knowledge of the university
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: No original research is necessary (the information is well-sourced), and it does not violate 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: into Stanford University or one of its many sub-articles. Subject has not received significant coverage in multiple non-primary or non-secondary reliable sources. Yes there is mention in secondary reliable sources, and there is significant coverage in at least one tertiary source, but one source IMHO does not met the requirements set forth in . Therefore, since its existence can be verified, and it falls within the scope of the article Stanford University it should be included in that article or one of its sub-articles. If more than one tertiary reliable source can be found that gives the subject significant coverage my opinion can be persuaded
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)