Deletion of Jill Taylor (2nd nomination)

Comment: No |reliable sources, and most of this article is simply |original research in the nature of personal observation of the tropes of a television programme.  There is no real |notability here, AFAIK, and none is asserted.  I think this topic would be amply covered by a mention in the article about the series itself or perhaps one that covered the protagonist, and I'm sure there's already enough present to make a merge a useless exercise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: Bah. This is one of those "before the internet so no reliable sources are going to be online" cases. Which was pointed out in the last afd. Deleting this solves nothing, since a major character from a long running tv show is generally going to be encyclopedic, but finding ANYTHING online is, at best, problematic. And since the nom has made it clear he dislikes |just notable as a reason, I'll cite |ignore all rules and |wikipedia has no deadline as my reasons. This is certainly a situation where strict adherence to the rules does more harm than good. Barring a keep, I'd concede to a redirect/merge to an appropriate list of characters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:IAR||WP:DEADLINE)