Deletion of Jamal Lasri (3rd nomination)

Comment: I did a somewhat careful search using WoS and, after removing quite a few high-citation publications from Jacob Lasri (who was at Technion, Northwestern, et al, and who is a different person from the subject), I find a publication list having citations: 38, 35, 31, 29 (h-index 14). The highest citation papers in this list have many authors and seem to come from the lab of Armando Pombeiro. That is, it does not appear that Lasri was the PI or sole investigator, but rather a lab member of some kind. He may be a "brilliant scientist", as our colleague asserts above, but the standard metrics by which a scientist in a high-citation discipline is assessed here at WP do not yet indicate notability. This is probably . The history of the article does not help. I would suggest that proponents and other interested editors revisit this entry once Lasri has a higher scientific impact that can clearly be associated with him as an individual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails  and . Not notable. Article has been deleted four times in the past and hence an admin should consider 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:SALT)

Comment: I looked at it and I agree, I can't find anything that meets the criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)