Deletion of 104th meridian east

Comment: As far as the WP:NUMBER — meridians and parallels are different from various integers and irrational numbers: aside from there being a specific "number" of them (only 360 existing), they're quite useful for a vast range of things.  I'm not arguing : the meridians and parallels themselves are useful.  They're obviously highly documented (find them in any atlas), and being far more than just numbers there's a far greater chance that this article would get necessary sources.  Even if they were numbers they would pass "Is it listed in a book such as David Wells's Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers, or on Erich Friedman's "What's Special About This Number" webpage?", as they're listed in plenty of books that deal with meridians and parallels.  I'm not arguing for the keeping of a 104°37'12" article for one simple reason: miscellaneous longitudes like that, unlike 104°0'0", are not used in anything
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)