Deletion of Chinese virus

Comment: or '''redirect''' to one of the articles related to the virus or pandemic. The term has in fact been widely used (not just by Trump) or discussed, so regardless of whether some see it as offensive towards China, there is no reason not to keep this as a disambiguation page or redirect (). More than 500 people searched for this term on the English Wikipedia the day before the disambiguation page was nominated for deletion. We don't delete the article on the Spanish flu either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: per ''The Washington Post'':'''Chinese coronavirus''' infections, death toll soar as fifth case is confirmed in U.S.{{cite news |title=Chinese coronavirus infections, death toll soar as fifth case is confirmed in U.S. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/coronavirus-china-latest-updates/2020/01/26/4603266c-3fa8-11ea-afe2-090eb37b60b1_story.html |accessdate=23 March 2020 |work=The Washington Post |archiveurl=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/coronavirus-china-latest-updates/2020/01/26/4603266c-3fa8-11ea-afe2-090eb37b60b1_story.html |archivedate=4 February 2020}}and per ''The Guardian'':'''China virus''': ten cities locked down and Beijing festivities scrappedhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/23/coronavirus-panic-spreads-in-china-with-three-cities-in-lockdownand per the ''France 24'':'''China virus''' death toll rises to 42, more than 1,400 infected worldwidehttps://www.france24.com/en/20200125-china-virus-death-toll-rises-to-41-more-than-1-300-infected-worldwideand per the ''BBC'':'''China coronavirus''': Death toll rises as disease spreadshttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-51245680Last I heard, we in Wikipedia go by the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: to Donald Trump. It os not an accurate name for the virus, not used by any expert or WHO, nor is it in common use. It's use by a demagogue is more relevant for the article of said demagogue than for any virus. And yes, obviously  applies
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATP)

Comment: It does not violate  because it is not an attack page; it does not disparage the viruses and the tone of the page is about as neutral as one could make it. Having a disambiguation page is consistent with  because "Chinese virus" could refer to past flus associated with China, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, the 2019-20 coronavirus pandemic, or the virus that causes mosaic disease in plants. While Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2|SARS-CoV-2 would likely be the primary topic per , it is wise to avoid |recentism given that the pandemic is a major news item at the moment, so it makes more sense to have it as a disambiguation page instead of a direct redirect to SARS-CoV-2 that adds a hatnote pointing users to Clerodendrum golden mosaic China virus. Additionally, the fact that 13 viruses include the name "China" in list of virus species would make it implausible to hatnote and instead, the list is linked in the disambiguation page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATP||WP:DPAGE||WP:PRIMARYUSAGE||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: to Coronavirus disease 2019 as per . The virus originated in China (despite propaganda from the Chinese government that states otherwise https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/asia/coronavirus-china-conspiracy-theory.html), so this is actually an accurate name. The nominator is misguided as this has zero elements of an attack page
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:OTHERNAMES)

Comment: The WHO said it is racist, and all regions should not to use this term. It also applies to : "the redirect is offensive or abusive". So I think this redirect should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)