Deletion of Veta La Palma

Comment: Nontrivial coverage in http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1902751,00.html Time Magazine, http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/04/04/andalucia/1301903454.html El Mundo, and http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/earthrise/2012/04/20124615166529417.html Al-Jazeera alone is enough to satisfy , which states that "evidence of attention by international or national ... media is a strong indication of notability". Seems also to have been discussed (albeit briefly, and usually as the site of an investigation) in several books, e. g.,  http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=V5KZSDpuwGIC&pg=PA155&dq=Veta+La+Palma&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YJnvUMHtN8uY1AWXkICICQ&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Veta%20La%20Palma&f=false 1, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=khHxo669v80C&pg=PA185&dq=Veta+La+Palma&hl=en&sa=X&ei=jJrvUPu0OYLK0QWHhICoBQ&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=Veta%20La%20Palma&f=false 2, and numerous scholarly articles, e. g., http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.1027/abstract 1, http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/37173 2, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FB%3AVEGE.0000026323.56635.4e?LI=true 3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Passes . For starters, see http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1902751,00.html, http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2011/04/04/andalucia/1301903454.html, http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/earthrise/2012/04/20124615166529417.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)