Deletion of Informed Consent (website) (2nd nomination)

Comment: it certainly ''appears'' notable, given the large member count and how decisive the previous AFD was.  That said, the sourcing IS very poor, and I can't find much better either (there's http://www.newstatesman.com/nma/nma2008/entry/200805070004 this, but it isn't much) and may not pass .  I'd probably be leaning toward delete if better sources can't be found by the end of AFD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per nom. Haven't found any sources that help article pass  or . How did all of those  arguments in the previous AfD slip by and result in a keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB||WP:ILIKEIT)