Deletion of List of United states presidents with facial hair during their tenure

Comment: I'm confused at all the deletion arguments here, this list shouldn't be contentious in its own right since (a) the criteria for entry are clear and the number of entries finite, (b) the idea of ''facial hair on presidents is itself notable'' - not just that it's noteworthy on the articles of individual presidents whether or not they have facial hair, but that a standalone article can be justified, (c) per  this is far better dealt with as a list than a category or navigational template since it isn't sufficiently defining a characteristic (NB this is not the same as non-notable, notability is largely a source issue) for a navbox and requires annotation (e.g. beard? sidebeard?) not possible for a category. This may surprise some folk here, but actually there is scholarly study of hair-styling and appearance! Politicians don't look the way they do at random (although some stuff is beyond choice: witness frequent study of whether being taller makes you disproportionately likely to win elections). Consequently it's not fair to call this stuff genuinely "trivial" - though people are quite welcome to deem it "subjectively banal" or "on the grand scale of history, not particularly important
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLT)

Comment: many arguments for keep claim this list , we can verify that Presidents had facial hair but that is not the same as it being notable. what next List of British prime ministers with facial hair during their tenure, List of First ladies with brown hair during their husband's tenure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSUSEFUL)

Comment: The topic is covered in numerous sources including ''http://books.google.com/books?id=QUIZSVzxqukC&pg=PA91 Media literacy: thinking critically about visual culture'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=0VpeU4UKqGkC&pg=PT171 Project President: Bad Hair and Botox on the Road to the White House'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=9Z6vCGbf66YC&pg=PA280 Encyclopedia of hair: a cultural history'', ''http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1656060 Predicting Elections from Biographical Information About Candidates'', ''http://books.google.com/books?id=BNF9_lfvvTwC&pg=PA25 The American Presidency'', etc.  The claims above that the matter is trivial, not encyclopaedic, notable and the like are therefore counterfactual.   If we wish to generalise the article to cover other countries, then sources such as ''http://books.google.com/books?id=ArOzOnGk-rMC&pg=PA74 The sociology of philosophical knowledge'' will provide even more good material. Our |editing policy mandates that we should build upon contributions in this way, rather than deleting them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: No indication that this is a serious topic worthy of inclusion in an encyclopaedia so fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)