Deletion of Dew computing

Comment: Per . No evidence that this term has any real traction outside of a paper or two
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: A COI editor of the article asks "If an research area like this is not notable, what is notable?" That is easily answered: a theory is considered notable here if there is evidence that it has attracted substantial attention from other academics in the field. A simple rough-and-ready measure of that is provided by the number of cites shown by Scholar. In this case the maximum cites for any of the papers are 2. That indicates that the topic is not notable by our standards and it is  for Wikipedia to have an article about it. It also turns out that the page is a copyvio; I'd normally have nominated it for speedy deletion as G12, but have instead blanked it and listed at  so that this discussion can run its course
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CP)