Deletion of Thomas Alured Faunce

Comment: Subject might be notable but the sources are mostly print and therefor cannot be easily verified. Normally a presumption of good faith would attach but in this case there is overwhelming evidence that the article is the |autobiography of a naked |COI. Under the circumstances I think in the interest of encyclopedic integrity the best course of action is to |blow it up and start over with a non-COI editor. Maybe run the next version through AfC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AB||WP:COI||WP:TNT)

Comment: for lack of evidence of passing  and . In particular,  asks for multiple published reviews of the author's books, not just library holdings. I searched but only found self-published ones
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)