Deletion of List of video games by monthly active player count

Comment: per -REASON 6: {{tq|Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources, including wikipedia:Avoid neologisms|neologisms, wikipedia:No original research|original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes|hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes)}}, ''unless'' it can be demonstrated that we actually can attribute this to  sources in a way that doesn't violate  and which keeps this from being constantly out of date (in which case I am neutral as to the encyclopedic merits of this article). I'm not exactly holding my breath, however
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:RELIABLE||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: even if we put aside , and ; wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is no encyclopaedic value behind "which game was played the most last month". There is no way to get true numbers, as the numbers are going to come from primary sources, even if they are later reported by secondary sources. Keeping the article is not even in question as the article is not encyclopaedic to begin with. We already have "YYYY in video gaming" (:2019 in video games). A brief note can be added in such articles, based on third party observations. One more similar article is :List of most-played video games by peak concurrent users. —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Obvious unverifiable and perpetually outdated  and . If Wikidata had something this might work. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOR)