Deletion of Gwenaëlle Thomas

Comment: Independent and reliable sources suggest there is a developing basis for  notability: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/the-odds-are-stacked-against-black-latino-students-going-to-grad-school-here-are-some-solutions The odds are stacked against black, Latino students going to grad school. Here are some solutions (PBS NewsHour, 2019, quotes with context and educational background), https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article244798327.html Black in Neuro Week puts spotlight on Black scientists studying the brain (The News&Observer, 2020, context, several quotes, career and some biographical information), but that is all I have been able to find at this point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I agree with  , right now the article does not support 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)

Comment: sadly as much too soon while sobbing at the waste of student effort. I will note that the students did the training exercise that includes https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students/finding-your-article/find-a-notable-topic finding a notable topic. (The same page is also in the teacher training materials). In addition the :c:File:Editing Wikipedia Articles Biographies.pdf|biographies guide listed on the course Timeline says {{tq|Notability means the subject has received significant coverage, over a period of time, in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject.}} It also provides links to  and . I don't know what else WikiEd can do, except put together a list of pitfalls that instructors should avoid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: I agree it is  and there is not enough for  based on the sources we have found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:BASIC)