Deletion of William H. Kennedy

Comment: Umm, where is the evidence that he is notable?   appears to be the relevant standard.  Based on the claims in the article, it looks borderline to me.  An internet based radio show is a podcast by another name.  I haven't succeeded in finding the reviews of his work to meet the published author criteria.  Absent any independent |reliable sources, I choose to be consistent and believe that deletion as non-notable is the appropriate outcome.  (Note there also may have been an individual of the same name involved in Travelgate, but I found no reason to believe that it is the same person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: As an admin who has been watching the article, let me weigh in a little on it's history.  And there is a good bit of deleted history to it.  The article's subject is apparently fairly controversial in certain circles, and has a number of detractors.  There was an edit war a while back between a strong supporter and a strong detractor.  The detractor was posting some extremely derogatory material, but would provide no sourcing that would satisfy .  Several admins (including me) became involved, the page was protected, and in the end the bulk of the edits with the derogatory material was removed from the edit history.  The one "vandalism" that has happened since then was of similarly derogatory material.  It was quickly reverted by {{user|Dawn Horse Warrior}}, who is at the least a strong Kennedy supporter.  So in the end this is not about normal vandalism, but a  issue, with unsourced derogatory material.  Still revert on sight stuff, but a different type of "vandalism" than most are used to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP)