Deletion of Satyr (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: the burden is on editors wishing to add or keep material to show such references exist. Nobody has yet shown there is a single independent |reliable source that makes a non-trivial mention of the ''Dungeons & Dragons'' satyr
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per |Wikipedia is not paper, plenty of references, article is only a stub (it is at the moment, anyway), plenty of potential for expansion. No actual deletion reason given (notability is established) and "fancruft" is of course the nominators opinion. '''thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I would normally say merge and redirect to Fey (Dungeons & Dragons) per  but there's no encyclopedic content to be merged, and this wouldn't be a useful redirect if it were redirected, so just delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per  as Pak21 said. No encyclopedic content here. - unsigned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: looking through those references, http://www.larpmag.com/Issue01_April_06/hotmakeasatyr01.htm How to make a Satyr makes only a trivial reference to the ''D&D'' satyr.  The two from tfcentral.com http://narzil.tfcentral.com/ecology.htmlhttp://narzil.tfcentral.com/hooves.html would appear to be nothing more than fan musings on the subject, and as such are not |reliable sources ("personal websites ... are largely not acceptable as sources."). The http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dnd/20050930a last is a creation of Wizards of the Coast, so really is '''not''' independent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)