Deletion of List of college dropout billionaires

Comment: pure trivia, an indiscriminate list with an arbitrary inclusion criteria. This is almost entirely cited to Forbes, and a lot of the coverage is actually on the millionaires/billionaires who didn't obtain degrees, NOT solely on those who dropped out of college/university, as this list portrays. Whilst there is obviously a lot of crossover there, it doesn't help make this current article notable. This list is also solely centred around modern-day folk; people in the past, with levels of wealth that are equivalent to a modern-day billion, are obviously not going to qualify. It even lacks people in the past who DID have this level of wealth, so is a case of .  arguments seem to be prevalent above. An article of List of billionaires without college degrees ''probably'' should exist, but I'm not seeing how the current article is worth keeping in any form, and the change in inclusion criteria is pretty dramatic, and thus, this content being in the history would be redundant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Violates  (non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations) as a list of people who are X and are also Y.The sources provided relate only tangentially to the article topic - none of them deal in depth with the subject of the education levels of the super-wealthy.The article is woefully delineated in scope - the definition of "billionaire" seems to based on the US Dollar and on the opinions of a single magazine. A more appropriate title would be ''List of college dropouts who are billionaires according to Forbes and providing their wealth is measured in USD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (:WP:NOTDIR)