Deletion of Noorhaidi Hasan

Comment: There is no indication of notability per  so a notability case would have to be made under . The citation results are pretty low; similarly the library holdings of his books are also fairly lowhttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/71322688&referer=brief_resultshttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/185038185&referer=brief_resultshttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/475387492&referer=brief_resultshttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/234071007&referer=brief_results. Not enough here to make a case for satisfying criterion 1 of .  I don't see evidence of passing any other criteria of  (such as significant awards, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: the Indonesian project had numerous stubs that have a lot less  and  that remain unchallenged - I remain unconvinced that this article is deletable - there are some avenues not yet pursued to ascertain notability within the Indonesian context
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: GS cites 41, 13, 5, 5,3..... so does not do well on rof #1. I am not familiar with citation patterns in Indonesian studies. Notable in general terms, articulate scholar in an important area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)