Deletion of Add Grup

Comment: I concur almost entirely with the nominator's analysis of the article's sources as directory-type listings, trivial mentions, press releases, otherwise not third-party, or not significant coverage. However, I agree with {{U|ThaddeusB}} that there is no proof that the http://www.logos.press.md/node/34072 Logos Press article is a paid promotional piece. (Admittedly, I'm not au fait with the media landscape there, and my Moldovan is rudimentary.) The http://newsmaker.md/rus/novosti/aleksey-lazarev-na-samom-dele-my-gorazdo-luchshe-ih-umnee-my-golodnye-a-oni-sytye-10667 interview ThaddeusB found might be a useful source of information, but doesn't establish notability because it's a primary source which is mostly the president of the company talking about the company, with little or no independent analysis. Searches turned up no additional sources that would prove notability. With at best one independent, reliable, secondary source, the subject fails to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I am '''neutral'''. At  our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. I viewed that this was likely to survive (>0.6 probability). I have no detailed comment to make on the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)