Deletion of Craigslist controversies and illegal activities by users

Comment: or merge to one of the Craig's list articles which is .  I am an uninvolved editor in all three articles in discussion at AFD's and there seems to be a lot POV going on and ynthesis and  happening in some.  The AFD's I have looked at so far it seems the same editors are debating the same thing on all three AFD's.  Craigs's list would have no problems with  either since it has been well publised in the media.  Just my opinion of course
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:S||WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: per ork. ''Edited:'' . Every article's section can stand alone as an article in its own right without review? Really? I'm sorry -- I missed that at the elp "getting started" link. If somebody creates the article Obama family, I can nominate it for deletion, then go to the Barack Obama article and cut'n'paste its "Family" section, then create my own article? Why, because the creator of the original "Obama Family" article is lame and I'm not? Text book ork! (An aside to Viriditas): How's that...? {smiles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F||WP:CFORK||WP:H||WP:F)