Deletion of Lars Walker

Comment: fails . A good many people do good work everyday. Nobody knows who they are and nobody should care. Belle Knox, if she's good at anything, is good at getting attention and that's what encyclopedias write about. Your complaint should be against the secondary source literary critics that should give this guy more press
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I apprecciate the passion of the good faith article's creator, but apparently this fantasy novelist does not meet any notability guideline (, ,  or other suitable SNGs). I sympathize with him because I think every article creator has a couple of favorite topics that sadly seems to be non notable enough for inclusion. I suggest him to work a bit on their articles in the sandbox before moving them in the mainspace, and to eventually ask a preliminary opinion to a more experienced editor, at least until guidelines and policies will not be crystal clear to him. I worked a lot in the sandbox before moving articles on obviously notable novelists such as Ercole Patti and Guido da Verona in the mainspace, and they are still stub/start class articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Gentlemen, '''if it makes you "sad"''' (so far, we have three "sad" people, if I may count myself among them, of the four who've weighed in, making the tally: ''everyone'' here so far, aside from the submitter, is sad), '''don't do it.'''  This place has enough |bureaucracy already that articles more noteworthy than this one are in perilous straits as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:bureaucracy)