Deletion of Wyatt Gallery

Comment: With regard to the museum holdings, I certainly see the claims, but no accompanying . The only sources in the article are still all limited to his own web-pages. We all seem to agree on this. However, I still don't see that real sources would even be enough for a "keep". The claim of something like "so-and-so's photographs are in 2 museums" is pretty much on par with "so-and-so's research is in 2 journals" &ndash; this is far more of a ''necessary'' condition rather than a ''sufficient'' one, considering the oodles of museums and oodles^2 number of artists represented therein. There is nothing ''substantive'' which really makes this person stand out from the herd of others. (I'm sure lots of artists have "explored Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia" et al. for inspiration.) Awards such as "25 Under 25, Up-And-Coming American Photographers" seem to me to be hollow accolades, on par with Marquis Who's Who|Who's Who and such. Add to this the fawning tone ("a celebrated American Photographer"), and it sure paints a picture of being a  fan-page. Respectfully
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PUFF)

Comment: Several guidelines have been floated, including  and , none of which Wyatt Gallery passes individually. I have argued that proponents are overlooking blatant issues of , , and . (The most serious issue for a , lack of reliable sources, is still not resolved.) Conversely, the tacit argument they seem to have formed is that there's a little bit of each of , , and  such that, if you add all these up, you get what is essentially a "piecemeal notability". Respectfully
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PORNBIO||WP:RS||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP||WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Passes  per DGG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: This appears to be either a fan-page or a vanity-page. Article talks mostly about jobs the subject has had and where he has traveled. Notability might rest on claimed awards, but these are neither verified nor significant.  could be relevant, since there's a claim that he's an adjunct at University of Pennsylvania|Penn (funny that article does not even spell the school's name correctly), but http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Wyatt+Gallery%22 GS does not show any contributions that would pass art. #1. Finally, all the references supplied by the article are actually the subject's own Public relations|PR materials. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)