Deletion of Reigate St Mary's School

Comment: It passes  in its own right though in all other circumstance we would delete a prep school. We have to consider each case individually. We can dismiss MERGE and REDIRECT. What makes it different is its interesting history, and changes of age intake over the year. Predominently, we are talking about a choir school that has tiptoed between state, church and independent sectors as the legal framework for schools changed in the 20th century. If it had always acted as a junior department to a feepaying independant school then it would be MERGE as per /AG or delete. This is a keep, but I would want to add a few Ofsted or equivalent reports and cut out any promotional material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WPSCHOOLS)

Comment: The school has enough coverage in reliable sources to comply with . Also, as a school with its own staff and its own separate campus and character, it would significantly complicate the Reigate Grammar School page, which has a different address, headmaster, origin, date of foundation, age range, accreditation, and so on. All such details would need to be stated twice in the single infobox. Article begun today will continue to expand and will soon be longer than the RGS page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fob's arguments above are spot on. This isn't a notable subject. However, per  and , redirect to the grammar school seems best. And {{u|Moonraker}}, your DYK nomination for this article is a crock. Are you simply ignorant of what a directory is? All the information in a directory is provided by the school and it isn't in any way a reliable independent source. A claim of uniqueness absolutely requires reliable independent secondary sources
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)