Deletion of Debt-trap diplomacy

Comment: but improve for  and . The topic is widely discussed in media and notable for inclusion, but the article as currently written is heavily dependent on the US-dominated narrative that paints everything that China does in a negative light. Before the recent rise of China, the developing world had long been heavily dependent on the West for loans and not infrequently "trapped" into financial crises, yet the article covers none of the history. As https://www.ft.com/content/2a2b402c-c7b4-11e8-ba8f-ee390057b8c9 Financial Times has shown, China only holds 20% of Africa's foreign debt (the majority still held by the West), and African public opinion has largely rejected the negative US narrative, see https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/analysis/ideas/Why-thinking-of-China-debt-trap-diplomacy-is-a-fallacy/4259414-4826058-4q9w45/index.html "Why thinking of China debt trap diplomacy is a fallacy", https://qz.com/1391770/the-anxious-chorus-around-chinese-debt-trap-diplomacy-doesnt-reflect-african-realities/ "The language of “debt-trap diplomacy” reflects Western anxieties, not African realities". These views need to be added for balance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: a search on the topic shows that its has received |significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Clearly  was not done prior to the submission of this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Meets .  Do a DuckDuckGo search and boom!, the first result is a CNBC report on Chinese debt trap diplomacy and neocolonialism in Latin America.  I've added a whole new section to the article as a result
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)