Deletion of Dr. Jeffrey Weidenhamer

Comment: I have not made up my mind one way or the other yet, but the case does not appear to be such a shoe-in for passing . The citation data in GScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Jeffrey%20Weidenhamer%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws is OK but not all that outstanding. Top citation hits are 125, 96, 92, 90, 53, 35,... with an h-index of about 15. That's good, but for an active experimental area like Chemistry, with 20+ years of research career, this does not strike me as a particularly outstanding record.  He holds the rank of Distinguished Professor, so one could argue for #5. However, his university offers almost no graduate degrees, and no M.Sc. or PhD degrees in Chemistry or related fields, so it is not clear if Criterion 5 of  is applicable here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: the article to the correct name minus the title. Now the promotional stuff has been removed this should stay. This is JD Weidenhamer who absolutely romps  on citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)