Deletion of Mitchell Bailey

Comment: He does not pass , and the sourcing is ''not'' adequate to state that he passes  in lieu. While it's true that the CBC is Canada's national public broadcaster, the CBC link provided here is ''not'' from the CBC's ''national'' news division, but from its ''local'' station in the subject's own hometown, so it does ''not'' demonstrate that he got |reliable source coverage ''beyond'' just the CBRM alone. The ''Cape Breton Post'' is also local coverage; ''LocalXpress'' is a hyperlocal webmedia startup, not a widely distributed daily newspaper that counts toward GNG at all; and virtually all of the other references are PR blogs. A musician does not automatically get to have a Wikipedia article just because the ''local'' media in his own hometown paid him some attention, because that's simply to be ''expected'' — to get a musician past NMUSIC, the reliable source coverage has to expand outward ''beyond'' just the hometown local outlets. Plus the |conflict of interest issue doesn't help — COI isn't a deletion criterion in and of itself if the article can be ''repaired'', but this can't yet. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he's got a stronger notability claim and evidence of ''wider'' not-just-Cape-Breton reliable source coverage than he does right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:COI)

Comment: a promotional article on an artist who's not yet notable. "#46 on the Canadian iTunes Hip-Hop charts" is hardly a claim of significance. The sources provided above are not convincing, being  / passing mentions, or otherwise not suitable for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)