Deletion of Kristina Rose

Comment: automatically notable under  for winning the XRCO awards. Anti-porn votes are certainly present here, and it seems their votes hinge on the argument that XRCO "aren't significant". They are, of course; they're second only to the AVN awards, and as such, Rose is notable enough for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Passes  with her XRCO Awards for Superslut and Orgasmic Analist, which are well-known/significant industry awards that aren't scene-related/ensemble categories. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariana Jollee|We have very recent consensus to support the inclusion of the XRCO Superslut award in PORNBIO. Orgasmic Analist is also a legitimate award for a porn industry awards show. The whole point of porn awards is to reward performances in porn films. Anal sex is a popular porn category, so it makes sense for a porn awards show to give an award to a performer they perceived to be the best in the genre that year. Mocking the names of these categories is not a legitimate reason at all to attempt to degrade their value under PORNBIO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Even accepting that the subject meets |PORNBIO, per {{slink||Additional criteria}}, that "does '''not''' guarantee that a subject should be included." As the available coverage does not come anywhere near that required by |BASIC or |GNG, and keeping in mind the "additional criteria" disclaimer and |the reasons for the notability requirement, this article should not be retained.To save us all some time: This is not an |IAR vote; it's predicated on the plain text and manifest intent of |N and |BIO, especially |WHYN and RVE. I also have no moral objections to pornography; and, as a feminist concerned about the gender gap in Wikipedia's coverage, I would prefer to see more, not fewer, articles about women, no matter their subjects' occupations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||WP:WHYN||WP:IAR||WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:WHYN||WP:NRVE)

Comment: The XRCO Award may not be the Golden Globes, but Wikipedia's notability guidelines don't require iconic or superlative status. The individual XRCO wins satisfy the letter of . Niche categories like "Unsung Siren" and "Superslut" have been disputed though. However, the working consensus at recent AfDs has been that such performers satisfy the guideline and are likely notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Seriously? And a lot of the "delete" rationales acknowledge that she won awards, so I don't know if it's  or , but neither fly. '''Erpert
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:IAR)