Deletion of In Consequence

Comment: to Phase (band) as not notable per . There is no evidence of notability, and the album does not seem to have been reviewed in any |reliable sources. Keep arguments above are not in accordance with policy. There is no way an article can be significantly improved if it does not have any reliable sources: everything on Wikipedia must be capable of being properly referenced per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Nothing in the article constitutes third party significant coverage from |reliable sources, nor is anything that has been presented here. As such, it seems to fail the . I'm open to reconsidering should new sources arise, but so far, nothing is close to the sort of source we look for on Wikipedia, which is more like things listed at /SOURCES
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ALBUM)

Comment: in deference to the re-lister I'll talk about  first, however I'll start with the second criteria: "country's national music chart" - No. #3 is "certified gold" - No. #4 has been "nominated for a major music award" - Nope. #5 "recording was performed in a medium that is notable" - uh uh. Similar negative results for #6 and #7. Regarding #1, which would also go to whether it meets , there does not appear to be any significant, in-depth coverage about the album from independent, reliable, secondary sources to show it meets either the #1 of NALBUM, or for GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:GNG)