Deletion of Criticism of Zwarte Piet

Comment: Keep in mind that Wikipedia is |not news. and that is exactly what most of this article is, just news.  The essential debate should be able to be presented in a short paragraph in the main article on Zwarte Piet.  If that is done, then no |content fork is necessary, and there will be no |undue emphasis. No redirect is required since "Zwarte Piet" is the primary search term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: and '''Redirect''' to Zwarte Piet (and restore the material there, though I don't think that qualifies as a merge here) ''without prejudice to recreation if consensus emerges in discussion on the main article that it's an appropriate ''. For now, it's looking an awfully lot like a . See the page creator's comments above being about reducing the amount of criticism on the Zwarte Piet page ({{tq|"I simply want the amount of attention given to them to match their popular support within Dutch and Belgian society"}}). There are "criticism of..." articles, but they're very rare, subject to a high degree of scrutiny, are always accompanied by thorough summaries left on the main article page, and require both an extreme amount of coverage of the criticism itself and a main article that's about a much bigger subject which would be dominated by the criticism in an  way. I frankly don't know if a criticism article is justified, but think that's best discussed on the article talk page first. FWIW, I'm also not opposed to '''Userfying''' for the time being &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE)