Deletion of Charleston City Paper

Comment: per above, coverage but not adding up to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think this passes  as a significant paper in its market, and cited by other reliable sources.  We have many articles about alternative weeklies and I think this is a positive for the encyclopedia, for the reasons discussed at .  Some examples that suggest notability to me include http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20141217/PC16/141219517http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/s-c-high-court-finds-newspaper-defamed-womanhttp://www.islandpacket.com/2013/05/06/2491932/flynts-criticism-of-charleston.htmlhttp://www.postandcourier.com/article/20140806/PC1603/140809628http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20141124/PC16/141129654http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20130719/PC16/130719343http://dinersjournal.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/what-were-reading-304
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMEDIA||WP:NMEDIA)