Deletion of Scott Wolter

Comment: WP:ACADEMIC clearly doesn't apply (he works outside academia, and has never published in peer-reviewed journals).  misses criteria (not a significant “fan base”, and not significantly involved in ''multiple'' TV shows or ''notable'' films. The only area of notability I'd consider is  criterion 3: “The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.” His research on the KRS and books (KRS & Hooked X) are somewhat well known in the US, even if widely disputed, and formed the basis for the two documentaries and television show he's been a part of, and to some extent Kehoe's KRS book (also widely disputed, as in Wallace 2006 & Zimmerman 2008 – not arguing about the quality of the science!). The periodical citations above include several articles and reviews about all of these works. For some measure of being well known, an ''America Unearthed'' episode last month had more than 1 million viewers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: to America Unearthed, a likely search term but  his only possible claim to notability is the show
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Fringe people who are covered in non-fringe sources are notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)