Deletion of Frederick C. Kulow

Comment: Lots of passing mentions and entries in book, but only https://www.newhope.com/news/frederick-c-kulow-natural-products-pioneer (mentioned by Epinoia) comes up as a . Therefore, Fredreick doesn't meet  which requires "multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject".  The Big Bad Wolfowitz's argument falls flat per  and , as we need to have evidence that the subject received significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC||WP:NRV||WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES)

Comment: Not all obits in the newspaper are unpaid for staff written obits. It’s difficult to judge the quality of the source within the article without  a url link. No other sources I’be found are significant as they are all tangential to Mr. Kurlow. Fails  in either case. Even if this obit is one good source, Wikipedia requires multiple sources to verify notability. The subject does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)