Deletion of Kreuz Kaiserberg

Comment: the discussion mentioned by DGG also commented that each interchange should be judged on its own merits as to whether or not it passes GNG, which this one clearly does not. The lack of AGF on the part of Bahnfrend is disconcerting, and patently false. There is no systemic bias, there was simply a case of an over-abundance of non-notable interchanges on German freeways. Prods and AfD's have been initiated on those appropriate in other countries as well, it is simply that there wasn't this super-abundance of non-notable articles in those countries. Simply a case of not meeting , nothing more. An article existing in other Wikipedia's is not a valid reason for inclusion here, as each Wikipedia has different standards of inclusion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails to establish notability inline with . Just because this has a name does not provide an assumption of notability because every interchange in Germany is named. Other language editions of Wikipedia can have stricter or less strict inclusion requirements than us, so the presence or absence of articles there should have no bearing on whether we have an article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)