Deletion of Firefly Online

Comment: The game meets the |GNG with significant coverage from a variety of independent, reliable sources currently included in the article. As mentioned in the Template:Did you know nominations/Firefly Online|DYK nom, I do not see the article as promotional (nevertheless overly promotional). As for the quality of the information in the sources, this type of sourcing is endemic to the genre and all prerelease video game articles start this way—the RS are reporting what the developer has to give (unless they're getting around the developer somehow?) and we have no reason to not use what the RS deemed worthy for publication. The only other argument I could see is for a redirect if the sourcing was too thin (which I judge to not be the case here), but even that would be a merge conversation and this topic would not qualify for a deletion discussion (AfD). czar&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)