Deletion of Church of the Holy Archangels, Bălți

Comment: There is no Wikipedia:Notability (churches) (proposed guideline did not pass. Neither did Wikipedia:Notability (architecture) nor Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks). What's left is : "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." and given I do not see any entry for churches at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, that's all we have to go on outside of broader . And in light of that, I would agree with Biruitorul. The sources here are very weak, inclusion on some list of churches/buildings, and passing mentions in very local, very niche sources that don't seem particularly reliable. It's one thing if a church is a historical building (monument). But outside that, unless there's some proper coverage per N, this fails at being encyclopedic. Ping me if there are any new arguments for me to consider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT||WP:N)

Comment: both as they seem to be notable buildings having good references to support a claim of notability and therefore passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)