Deletion of Harry Setyawan

Comment: for reasons cited above.  Meets , quite apart from the last event.  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)

Comment: I believe the question is, "Would this meet GNG prior to the sub loss?" In my interpretation (not being able to read the sources), the prior refs appear to be |routine coverage of an ordinary military career from |non-diverse sources that are likely just printing government press releases
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: There is significant coverage of him personally, and he played a notable role in the event. Quoting  exclusively - the article would only be valid to merge (which would be preferable to deletion) "if the individual is only notable for that incident and it is all that the person is associated with in the source coverage", but instead there are multiple references covering him published well before the event so a merge is not possible. The article correctly exists, as "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate" and "if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified", which are both met due to extensive coverage of him personally due to being the highest ranking naval officer of a headline news piece for multiple days. The intention of the rule is to stop -biographies focused solely on an individual's role in an event; his biography is not focused on the event, with only five-sentences for it, and the remainder of the article being a high quality biography considering what information is available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:PSEUDO)