Deletion of LMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-2T 41241

Comment: oppose '''merge'''(to main class article).  Preserved engines acquire their own unique tracked history akin to a sports person and best dealt with as a LMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-2T|subpage of the class to avoid .  Its also why I oppose a merge, the ''Preservation'' of the class is already at or perhaps even beyond the  point in the main article and a merge makes it worse.  I am far also far from convinced the redirect would be any additional help in finding the main article.  With regards to the nomination the creator was in good standing at the time of the creation, and could have been created by anybody.  and despite to work with them (main issue was promotion of own images if I recall) that was not possible.  I do note effort is better spent improving and citing the main article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: the article does not pass , it in no way explains why this locomotive is notable apart from the fact it still exists. If there are UNDUE issues with merging to the parent article then create a new article about the class in preservation
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The encyclopaedic information about these locomotives would be  in the more general article, which as noted is already bordering on being unduly biased towards preservation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)