Deletion of Gokul Butail (2nd nomination)

Comment: Firstly, being a data analyst for a political party is not an "inherently" notable political role that would guarantee him a Wikipedia article just for existing, but the sources here are nowhere near good enough to get him over : one is a |primary source, two are glancing namechecks of his existence in articles whose core subject is something or someone ''else'', and three are short employment announcement blurbs that are not substantive enough to be notability-clinchers if they're the best sources on offer. Secondly, this is not a significant improvement over the version that was deleted in 2016 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gokul Butail. Thirdly, the article was created by an , so there's a possibility of |conflict of interest editing by himself, a friend or relative of his, or a public relations consultant he ''paid'' to put him in here — the creator of the 2016 version, while not the same username as this one, ''definitely'' had a COI, as they've retained the complete deleted original version as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SPA||WP:COI)

Comment: The sourcing is significantly lacking and fails to establish how this BLP passes the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This was already deleted once, and appears to be |conflict of interest.  The spamming of a copy of this into user space is not in itself a reason to delete but is an indication of further bad faith
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: since already deleted once, I think there's a possibility of |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)