Deletion of Sonic Eraser

Comment: Per Serge. Of the sources offered at this AFD from the Russian wiki: The first is sega.jp, which is a primary source and therefore doesn't support notability. The second, GHZ, is an unreliable fan site, with no credentials listed or history of fact checking. The third is Sega 16, an article by Ken Horowitz which is generally considered reliable, but we have a single paragraph on the topic in a broader list of various games. It's not really indepth coverage. Fourth is a spanish site, which I cannot evaluate because it appears to be offline and is not stored on Wayback. 5th is a Gamespot directory listing, no good. 6 and 7 are Sega 16, but not by Ken Horowitz, making them unreliable by current VG project consensus. From the Dutch wikipedia, we have another fan site with no credentials, and which doesn't even contain any information just some screenshots. From Italian wiki, we have Segaretro, an unreliable fan wiki, Giantbomb, another open wiki, a Japanese Sega site (which is a primary source, so doesn't count towards GNG), and the same GHZ fan site from Russian wiki. So from all this, we have a single reliable secondary source with a single paragraph dedicated to the game. The game definitely exists and passes , but there's no coverage that shows it passes 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: to either of the aforementioned possible targets given the lack of evidence of notability. Expansion of existing content, as suggested above, could be be problematic given the lack of , but that's not really a matter for this AfD discussion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per my rationale when I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sonic_Eraser&type=revision&diff=649703770&oldid=648342917 redirected it three years ago. Lack of sources to meet the 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)