Deletion of Ravichandran C (2nd nomination)

Comment: Very promotional and rather poorly written (standard for these Indian articles it seems, judging by what I've seen from AfD and elsewhere; lovely stuff). A search showed that he does write books, but none are notable, and what I could find from the news aside from an insane amount of cricket articles shows that his most recent newsworthy thing was starting a debate online over a Hindi doctor doing an Islamic prayer for a dying COVID patient, which isn't notable on its own and is probably just routine coverage that isn't going to be brought up again within a week. If this is staying, |TNT it, since it's very badly written and is chock full of promotional fluff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: intro par says, {{tq|He is a notable atheist, rationalist, author, promoter of science and rationalism, public speaker, blogger, YouTuber and debater}}. Absolutely not per the references available. Fails uthor, , WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:ENT)