Deletion of GNU AutoGen

Comment: really need third-party .  The Wikipedia comparison-of topic is not useful for this purpose.  The inclusion in gcc sources is interesting, but not every component of gcc itself is notable.  Notability is found where there's an independent reviewer (who is known for being an expert) making note of the topic, or some other in-depth treatment.  We can discuss sources when they're provided
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Not even close to notable.  Lacks reliable independent secondary sources as required by .  I looked; I don't think there's anything out there.  Furthermore, if you read what this thing does (yawn) it's really not surprising there's nothing to talk about except just man page stuff and, hence, no sources to be found.  Wikipedia is |not a manual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTMANUAL)