Deletion of E. M. Washington (2nd nomination)

Comment: there's a marginal claim to notability, but the Forbes article is practically the only reliable source for the negative claims and nobody's gone to jail yet. Optionally  due to prior problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: It's a close call, but there simply isn't enough to satisfy the requirements of  in the presented article. I'd recommend to leave open the possibility of a new article that states more about the notoriety of the person, most basically why Mr. Washington should be considered more worthy of a Wikipedia article than, say, a bank robber or someone who embezzled thousands of dollars from a corporation. There is potential, perhaps, for the subject... but I don't see it in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)