Deletion of Nick Norton

Comment: Perhaps a case of . But to be fair, he has credits in some notable films and has worked with various notable music theorists, and the references aren't bad either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: He's definitely not notable for his teaching and I see nothing that meets any criteria at .  Being an "assistant music editor" for two TV shows and an unreleased film do not seem like enough to me.  There are a lot of sources, but when I go through them I'm not seeing much in the way of significant coverage from sources that are both reliable and independent.  Therefore, I'd say he fails to meet  and so I find no notability criteria that he meets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCREATIVE||WP:GNG)

Comment: coverage is largely either non-independent or non-significant and falls short of . signed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Keep''', as there seems to be (beyond those in the article) "multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". While the sources seem to be biased, since they are mostly magazines and websites concerning music, it does not impair independence (see #Biased_sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDEPENDENT)