Deletion of Debra Ruh

Comment: I am completely gobsmacked at what seems to be a lack of ommon sense|common sense and lack of understanding that he rules are principles|the rules are principles. Why do I say that? I tried to save this article, because common sense told me that if the UN and the White House thought her work was important, it was worth looking into. And, I found that she is making a differences nationally and internationally in 104 countries in the lives of disabled people, but her work is "trivial". On the other hand, it appears, based upon results, that winning a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Sweeney|Miss Nevada contest (there's actually quite a number of similar articles up for deletion with barely a whisper) or having a marginal career like these https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAmy_Colley&type=revision&diff=752790868&oldid=752743405Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amit_Senchoudhary|here, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Amanda_Aardsma_(2nd_nomination)|here, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ahmed_Raqib|here, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diran Noubar|here, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Beckwith (2nd nomination)|here  - or the ones I nominated Tony Boy Espinosa and Raj Kandukuri, are no problem. (Side note: It's also no problem, based upon results, if someone writes about oneself and his company  as long as they spread the updates over time and don't make a nuisance of themselves, such as Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Obie Scott Wade|OSW.) I know people are going to think that I do have a close connection at this point. I truly don't. I just applied what I think is common sense. For years Talk:Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations/Archive_2#Thankfulness|I've believed in the  process of how things got done here, and now I'm getting disillusioned. It is seeming that attempting to save articles that ''may not'' meet letter of the guidelines, but IMO meet the spirit of guidelines is an effort in futility. It seems trying to get rid of the worst of the articles or resolve COI issues isn't a very productive exercise either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:T)

Comment: Many secondary sources have been provided showing passing of .  Improvements made to the article removed the promotional COI tone which is far preferable to deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)