Deletion of Paulo Pinheiro

Comment: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author%3Apaulo-pinheiro-da-silva Google scholar shows 7 publications with over 100 citations each (all I believe by the subject) and an h-index of 22, enough to show significant contributions to the subject and I think enough to pass #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: As per Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Citation_metrics, citation metrics alone, let alone citation metrics from Google, are probably not sufficient to establish notability. In addition, the policy does not give any numeric value for ''highly cited'' -- which is frustrating. I looked at some well-known scientists, and their ground-breaking articles are cited in the thousands or tens of thousands of times, not the hundreds. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=george+smoot&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=saul+perlmutter&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5. From my reading, it looks like this person is primarily known for having developed a markup language, but he did that with a group of scholars at Stanford, so it's hard to know what his contribution was. One of his co-authors on that project has documents that have been cited more than 4K times, and journal articles cited in the high three digits, as a comparison.https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=debora+l+mcguinness&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5. I think this is less than a slam-dunk, and don't see anything extraordinary about this researcher. This may be a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)