Deletion of List of things described as painted

Comment: as an |indiscriminate list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: WP:LIST, . I agree that this article is slightly more useful than some of the other related AfDs, but it's still not enough for inclusion. Sorry. I realise a lot of time went into this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: to avoid a snowball from cries for speedy delete.  lists what qualifies as a speedy delete, and if this matches any of the situations with the letter "G", then someone refers to that as well.  It is not a synonym for "strong delete".  That said, I think that there is room in Wikipedia for an article about  "painted" as a term used in when applied to flora and fauna in the sense of natural color.  At the moment, painted is a "re-DUH-rect" to paint, and if any of the article contributors wanted to take this down for retooling as  an article called "Painted", I'll have no compaints.  Not much more than a weak keep, because this is, as some have pointed out, cobbled together from articles that have the word "painted" in them.  I appreciate that someone has taken the time to add discriminating information, but even though it's not an indiscriminate list, it's not a disambiguation page either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:SPEEDY)