Deletion of Om Thanvi

Comment: I came here from a link on ANI. Clear pass of , should be kept. https://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/hindi-belt-life-down-muanjodaros-street/article7113649.ece http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/resurrecting-the-ruins/761659
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: He is a senior journalist/editor no one is doubting that. But Wikipedia's notability requirement are higher than that. As of now this subject fails  and . Shivkarandholiya12, you can click and read the notability requirements and judge for yourself if the subject passes any of these. In my opinion he doesn't. The subject was an employee of patrika.com so articles from patrika.com or Rajasthan Patrika would not qualify as independent. The book https://books.google.com/books?id=1kc9GmFWePUC&pg=PP12&dq=Om+Thanvi#v=onepage&q=Om%20Thanvi&f=false mentions the name of the subject in passing for providing Hindi news reference, it does not actually cite a literary work by this author. The Analysis of the source done by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: the person is a notable journalist and sources are reliable. Satisfies , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: news articles based on Press statements are dependent coverage see otability_(organizations_and_companies)#Examples_of_dependent_coverage|WP:ORGIND and cannot be used to establish notability. the news about Bihari award is based on the Press statement issued by KK Birla foundation, this also explains why all these sources were having exact same content. https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/india/dr-satyanarayana-the-bihari-award/articleshow/56201751.cms navbharattimes and https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/noted-writer-vijay-verma-awardedbihari-puraskar/story-6Ycs7FWPOlNgqK0DWyZoWK.html hindustantimes have credited similar articles to the foundations press statement, accordingly I have updated the source analysis table
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Meets  and  per https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/bihari-puraskar-for-writer-journalist-om-thanvi-115041300645_1.htmlhttps://aajtak.intoday.in/story/book-review-of-muanjodaro-by-om-thanvi-1-786421.htmlhttps://aajtak.intoday.in/story/book-review-of-muanjodaro-by-om-thanvi-1-786421.htmlhttps://www.indiatoday.in/pti-feed/story/writer-journalist-om-thanvi-felicitated-with-bihari-puraskar-457436-2015-09-01 and many other independent reliable sources that have provided the satisfactory coverage to the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I'm going to do a source assess table for the six citations.  The five bullet-pointed external links connote no notability whatsoever because they're all either |self-published or |unreliable blogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:IRS)

Comment: per analysis by Shivkarandholiya12. Meets both  and . I see gazillions of instances where his work is cited by other reliable sources including the ones mentioned here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)