Deletion of Jatland

Comment: hp|Uncle G}} first of all,  is not applicable here as the name is not given/created/labelled by census authority or any other government body. ''secondly:'' Elected or other politicians use it for politicial/divisive reasons, in that case it doesnt pass it ; as most of the times the term is used in either steriotypical manner (talking about Jat community), or in some sort derogatory and/or crude manner (or humour). These sources do not meet criteria for |reliable sources. The only two reliable sources that "mentioned" the term, was because they quoted the same peron who had used the term. It is as trivial as it can get.''Thirdly:'' Other such terms which are used, like Tristate area, or some "golden triangle" for industries, or toursim; are used by government officially. eg: "the crime rate in tristate area has increased, so we are increasing our efforts to stop it". That was a statement from few years back from the government. Other statements by government can be found like "offering schemes in x-y-z golden triangle to boost industries" or "tourism". There are also numerous articles ''about those'' areas. These articles discuss the subject in depth. Like "what constitutes as tristate, the brief history of tristate, how was the crime in past, the current crime situation, possible reasons/speculations of the increase, government's response to the increase" and so on. The point is, all of these areas receive |significant coverage that too |persistently. Whereas Jatland hasnt been covered by any  in depth. Government doesnt use it officially. It fails , and as explained in first point, it fails . Its a nickname. It exists. But its not notable. —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: exactly as RegentsPark explains, including their own referencing of Abecedare and usernamekiran. It is a nebulous concept deployed by lazy journalists. At best, this would be a  thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: The article meets the  and  criteria. It is reported by reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: as . A simple and self-explanatory portmanteau of ''Jat'' and ''-land'' that headline-writers sometimes find catchy, the subject itself fails  (as it represents no legally recognized or even disputed geographic entity) and  (no significant coverage by reliable sources of either the term or what it represents). And unlike, say, Khalistan, proposals for forming an actual Jatland are essentially https://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/khalistan-seeker-simranjit-mann-s-sad-a-now-demands-jat-land-state/story-xKmAzdyGEDqZYxMTDwITAI.html throwaway calls and are best covered as a single sentence at Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar) if found to be |due even there. At close of AFD, the page can be redirected to Jat people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC||WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG||WP:DUE)

Comment: From further research and examination of the references, this subject does not pass GNG. Jatland is not an actual region or village and the 2011 census has confined this.  is not met. I am unsure what Jatland refers to at this point but it seems plausible to assume that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)