Deletion of Betsy Sweet

Comment: Fails  and there is not enough significant coverage outside of her campaigns to pass  at the moment. The article can be recreated if she wins the election. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Candidates for federal office do not pass . It does not appear that the subject passes  (even accounting for the subject's past run for Governor of Maine). Since there is no obvious redirect target and that some of her background can be added to 2020 United States Senate election in Maine, the page should be deleted and not remain as a campaign brochure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: You didn't take my suggestion on the talk page and went forward with the AfD.   excludes mere candidates with the exception being if they achieve .  I have added a considerable number of |reliable sources, mostly Maine local media discussing her achievements, separate from the run for Senate, over the last couple of decades.  I could add more but I don't want to source bomb this.  The point is clear,  is achieved.  The delete votes above could have found this stuff by doing a , but deletionists don't ever do that.  When most of them voted there were 5 sources, now there are 19.  Two days ago I had never heard of Betsy Sweet, but then I don't live in Maine where she is a political player.  This stuff is available on google, please just look before you delete.  I see my old foe JPL was the first to chime in with a Delete vote.  I'm not surprised.  He hasn't seen an article he doesn't want to delete.  I'd rather not go into the rest of the ad hominem on the lengths he would go to delete articles.  I just wish you'd stop listening to him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Election candidates should not generally have articles per , unless notable for independent reasons.  Article stand-up in an campaign period is problematic especially as per here if the instantiator stands up an article with issues.  While issues from that stand-up have been identified and eliminated any items which might used for notability are either supported by un-awesome sources that are not  for those items.  From once no article then no redirect either as despite what essays some administrators might point at either a redirect for all candidates or for none .... unsensensible to do it for every candiate from the non-quacking heavy muscovy drake party so not sensible to do it for any.  No qualms about persons elected to high enough position or notable for some reason ... which would be better passed via the  process and bar and ideally outside of a campaign.Special:Contributions/109.157.77.207|109.157.77.207
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:AFD)

Comment: non-notable current candidate and past failed candidate, all of the coverage is about her candidacies and not about her activism. Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: per above. As a failed candidate and a future candidate, neither position meets .  concerns. The coverage that would count as |significant coverage of the subject is |routine campaign profiles, typical of election season
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:UNDUE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ROUTINE)