Deletion of Tim Woolgar

Comment: First, the nom violates , and ironically the thing the nom never heard of was linked to. You could have just read through that article to familiarize yourself with the subject. I think the nomination should be reworded. As for the article, the person seems notable enough, but major expansion is necessary. Maybe something like the man's accomplishments in the realm of chessboxing and beyond would be good. Notability should be asserted more
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTKNOWIT)

Comment: This individual is the founder of the UK chessboxing club (see http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:YCfTVuj_azAJ:news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7342494.stm+%22Tim+Woolgar%22+chess&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us this BBC article). He has received http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:ErTV0HOK25kJ:www.wharf.co.uk/2008/08/kings-of-the-ring.html+%22Tim+Woolgar%22+chess&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us some coverage about being "the UK’s first unofficial heavyweight champion...of Chessboxing." He also written an article on http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:kTdV2nuei-4J:www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp%3Fnewsid%3D4905+%22Tim+Woolgar%22+chessboxin&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us ChessBase.com about winning the tournament. Merge because he is the champion of a notable sport but hasn't received http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&fkt=1922&fsdt=6419&q=%22Tim+Woolgar%22+chessboxing&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= enough http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&fkt=1922&fsdt=6419&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Tim+Woolgar%22+chessboxing coverage to pass 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)