Deletion of UFC 155

Comment: Passes  as numerous mainstream sports and news organizations have and will be reporting on the event, as it contains arguably the most anticipated rematch in recent combat sports history as well as a number of fights make it one of the best cards in recent memory. Here is one of many so-called "fan sites" that agrees http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2012/10/27/3563758/ufc-155-is-the-best-card-ever-put-together Also, these so-called "fan sites" do qualify as reliable under  and . They are considered reliable my most anyone that knows and understands the sport, they don't have a history of misrepresentation or false reporting, their content is not user-edited and they are independant of the organizations they cover. The article itself passes  as well for all the reasons listed above. If any UFC article deserves a standalone Wiki page it's this one. Oh, and here are a few different sources that show the headline fight will determine the No. 1 heavyweight MMA fighter in the world. http://www.sherdog.com/news/rankings/2/Sherdogs-Official-Mixed-Martial-Arts-Rankings-46577 http://espn.go.com/mma/rankings/_/class/heavyweight http://www.fightmagazine.com/mma-rankings/mma-heavyweight-rankings.asp http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/heavyweight-265-lbs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:SOURCES||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  - does not have ''significant'' coverage in (multiple) wp:RS|reliable sources; acts as promotion for an event that has not yet happened, and has not yet received enough coverage to satisfy |notability requirements. Special:Contributions/88.104.5.244|88.104.5.244
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)

Comment: the relevant part of  has not been explained in this regard. Apart from which "countless hundreds of televised and reported sports events" is a misnomer in the regard for an event to determine the heavyweight champion of the world. Given UFC's effective monopoly on mixed martial arts, which seperates it from boxing and a reliance on Ring rankings, the fight between the two individuals who are indeed contracted UFC fighters are also the current top ranked heavyweights in the world. It is a misappropriation to claim that a heavyweight championship fight is of no notability unless you extend that the championship, fighters, and organisation are non-notable. &ndash;&ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:CRYSTAL, , /, and possibly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:PROMO||WP:NOT)

Comment: per Reason #2 of . It's a notable event with a heavyweight title bout, period. This discussion is completely unnecessary and the campaign to rid Wikipedia of UFC articles is getting old. Can we get an admin to close this, please
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: I've improved the article and added 2 more sources that meets  and . Just to clarify, MMAJunkie and MMAWeekly are not related to the UFC directly, but to MMA in general. And yes, they have a strong reputation for fact-checking and accuracy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES||WP:IS)