Deletion of Geometry of roots of real polynomials

Comment: re|D.Lazard}} Is the issue uplicate article; or at least wrong title to text that is duplicated? If so, is this a  option
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:MERGE)

Comment: as no -REASON|reason to delete has been provided.  Being an orphan is not a reason to delete as that's a deficiency elsewhere.  Merger of content is a strong reason to retain the content not a reason to delete it – see .  The leads of other articles point is unsupported by any evidence and, in any case, is still not a reason to delete.  The title might need work but is still not a reason to delete as that's best addressed by a |move.  Note that the page previously had the title Graphical methods of finding polynomial roots, which seems clearer, so perhaps it should return to that.  Overall, the page looks quite reasonable and just needs some polish per our policy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:MAD||WP:MOVE||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: As explained above, Quadratic equation#Graphical solution and Quadratic equation#Geometric interpretation more comprehensively describe the topic, whereas this article does not even talk about the geometry of ''real'' quadratic roots and includes no content not already found elsewhere, making it a  as it stands. A summary-style meta-article () describing various polynomial roots would only make sense if we had articles devoted to Geometry of roots of quadratic equations, Geometry of roots of cubic equations, etc.; likewise, this would not be a valid sub-article () if expanded because it would address too many unrelated cases (do we commonly use hatnotes to subsections?). Thus, it seems that reasonable content expansion of this article would create a mess of links and hatnotes (what would be the main article for the topic?) and/or require double the maintenance work if the same content is presented similarly in two different articles. On the other hand, keeping only the sections of quadratic equation, cubic equation, etc. will not misguide readers and enable us to polish those sections and avoid having scattered, lower-quality content spread across multiple pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:SPINOFF||WP:SPINOUT)