Deletion of Dragonfly Productions

Comment: I did a search and other than some passing mentions in various articles (like this http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/harpurhey-is-not-a-hell-hole-manchester-residents-furious-after-bbc-reality-shows-negative-depiction-of-suburb-8501333.html) that predominantly focus on other topics, there really wasn't anything out there to show notability for this company. The best I could find were http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2009/03/13/actualidad/1236898801_850215.html these http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/5074811.Revealing_the_drama_behind_the_Darwins/ two articles. The first one mentions that the company would be making a film, the other mentions it produced it. Even put together and counting the passing mention, these are not enough to show that the company passes . I have no true issue with the company owner userfying it, although I'd recommend very heavily that they get a non-COI person to help edit and ensure that the article doesn't become promotional in tone or use non-reliable sources. The company might be active, might do some nice charitable work, and might be more known than Vinny's House of Video Production, but none of that in and of itself shows that the company passes notability guidelines. The company just isn't notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I can only find the same material that Tokyogirl79 found whih apparently is a different company named "Dragonfly Productions".  As such, there is no significant coverage in independent |reliable sources to establish that inclusion guidelines are met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: While the company existshttps://www.google.com/search?q=Dragonfly+Productions+(London)&hl=en&rlz=1C1GIGM_enUS525US525&ei=5ddAUeqwLYfnqwHY1YHIDQ&start=10&sa=N&biw=1024&bih=653and produces films which themselves receive coverage,https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dragonfly+Productions+(London)%22&hl=en&rlz=1C1GIGM_enUS525US525&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=YNdAUY-TLJGbrQGOjIH4Cw&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAA&biw=1024&bih=653 simple mentions as a production company and no in-depth coverage of themselves fails inclusion criteria set by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: There appears to be some confusion between |notability, and |verifiability.  Sources such as http://www.succeedfoundation.org/work/collaborators_dvd can be used as sources for the purposes of verification for statements of fact.  That is perfectly acceptable and necessary to confirm infromation in an article.  However, such sources are not usable for the purposes of establish that an article should be included on Wikipedia.  For that, we would be looking for significant coverage in such sources as newspapers and magazines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)