Deletion of Andrew Dalby

Comment: meets  ie. his books are "known" and have numerous reviews, nominator apparently being unaware of point 3 of  applying to book(s) is a concern
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: His book ''Language in Danger,'' has enough reviews and feature coverage in significant publications to pass , which alone carries Dalby past .  Looks like that is also true of ''Bacchus: A Biography.''  More to the point, a Proquest news archive search turned up reviews of many of his books in major newspapers, feature articles about him and one or another roof this books, interviews, I added a couple, scanned the rest of the first page of he search,and  stopped.   I don't know why Nom brought this here.  Possible an instance of our rampant PRESENTISM.  But this author is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Just the reviews on the two bluelinked book titles are enough for . I imagine there's more to be found for his other books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)