Deletion of Personal life of Jennifer Lopez

Comment: valid split-off article with sufficient size to stand alone. At best, this would be merged back to Jennifer Lopez as a necessary part of her biography, but I see nothing significant that can be trimmed from this to reduce its size. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal relationships of Paul McCartney, closed as keep, a group nomination that included similar articles for McCartney, Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley, and Frank Sinatra. As the closing admin there explained, the main issue is whether there is enough reliably sourced information to justify splitting from the main biographical article, particularly where so many of the relationships are with other notable people (in Lopez's case, Ben Affleck, Sean Combs, Marc Anthony) and are undeniably high-profile. The nom's dismissive characterization of this as "tabloid tittle-tattle" suggests , and is inaccurate in any event where the sources are not tabloid gossip rags but instead mainstream magazines and news outlets. This isn't merely transitory news either, because any biography of Lopez would include this info even though many of these relationships are now years old. There seem to be many WP editors who feel that info on anything other than accomplishments is not encyclopedic, as if biographies should be purged of anything personal. But the focus on this kind of personal information is not specific to entertainers or celebrities, nor limited to tabloid gossip; see Sexuality of Abraham Lincoln, Ann Rutledge (believed to be Lincoln's first love, notable for no other reason), Personal relationships of Alexander the Great, Personal relationships of James VI and I... If someone is notable, we want a full and rich portrait of them as human beings, not just their resumés
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: on principle as a content fork of the main article, which should cover this in the context of Lopez' whole life/works. Having this as a standalone perhaps risks creasing a magnet for |undue emphasis leading to a failure of NPOV. As a BLP this isn't acceptable and the policy should trump the GNG in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: as acceptable content fork. I'm not going to check the  but they ''seem'' sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES)

Comment: or '''selectively merge''' back to the main article. The existence of this article is pretty much incompatible with 's principle that "Biographies of living persons ("BLP"s) must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid." Any aspects of her personal life that are encyclopedically important must be able to be condensed to a length that fits into her main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: What part of  does the nominator referst to - the in-universe fiction, the lyrics of songs or the listing of statistics? That policy and  are bad policies to cite here, since none of them apply to delete this article - on the contrary, NOTNEWSPAPER is against single-time events (which this article is not) but instead it allows for "the enduring notability of persons and events" (which this article covers). This article looks like a |biography, not a diary. Per (4c), J.Lo "has won significant critical attention" not only for her work but for her personal life. Together with ample coverage per  the topics merits an article of its own if it has enough material, as it happens. I think moving most personal content from Jennifer Lopez and placing it here, thus separating personal and artistic life, and leaving only a |summary is a very good option, better than deleting everything
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:BIO||WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:SUMMARY)