Deletion of SAP User-Group Executive Network

Comment: There seem to be independent sources available to comply with , like http://www.finchannel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=23731&Itemid=99999999 this from The Financial, or http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/153423/sap_tweaks_support_offerings.html this one from PC World and there are other ones on Forbes, but I am having trouble accessing them + more http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=SAP+User-Group+Executive+Network here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Minor industry association with no showing of notability.  Article seems to be a |coatrack meant to insert links to various consulting firms into Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: While it does seem possible that notability could be established per Marcusmax (here's a couple more http://www.ibtimes.com/prnews/20081106/ca-sap-support-offrng.htm International Business Times and http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2008/11/11/233305/sap-enterprise-support-dominates-user-event.htm Computer Weekly) I see an article that is entirely written to promote the organisation and thus fails  and .  Maybe it could be rewitten, but only by first deleting everything that's there already and then writing from the sources.  The only source that is currently used is the organisation's own website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT||WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: or '''Redirect''': to SAP AG.  No independently published Gnews hits. Fails orp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)