Deletion of List of sportspeople by nickname (5th nomination)

Comment: Such lovely  but it violates |notability guidelines for stand-alone lists. This subject as a whole has not been discussed as a group or topic by independent reliable secondary sources, therefore the list is simply a directory or catalog and doesn't qualify to be a standalone list in Wikipedia. See also , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:LISTN||WP:WWIN||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: Keep for all the reasons cited in the last ''five'' AFDs for this article.  Worthwhile and useful lists.  ot paper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: the list is likely to aid readers in navigation and provide information per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST||WP:LISTCRIT)

Comment: It's the nomination that we don't need as its arguments are flawed, being contrary to policy such as , which makes it very clear that there's no practical limit.  We already have lists with hundreds of of thousands of entries.  Notice that list of sportspeople, list of species and list of minor planets are all blue links, for example.  When such lists get large, we just subdivide them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)