Deletion of Gell-Mann amnesia effect

Comment: Wikipedia is not Wikiquote, and this article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: to Michael_Crichton#Other_speeches, there is too much coverage to make delete a comfortable choice, too little to pass , so MERGing is a sensible move
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per . Specifically, this is basically a Michael Crichton quote and Wikipedia is not Wikiquote. There is no indication that this is notable independent of Crichton in my , and merging it to Michael Crichton would be undue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: A neologism that hasn't caught on or been studied by linguists or lexicographers. It's basically a quip, and as such, merging it into Michael Crichton seems to me like |undue weight. It's not a coinage that Crichton is known for, the way that, for example, Isaac Asimov is credited for ''robotics.'' I guess I wouldn't ''strongly'' object to a sentence or two at some place like Michael Crichton#Other speeches, but even that feels like adding trivia/cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE)

Comment: there's no evidence of |significant coverage of this |ordinary quote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:MILL)