Deletion of Shanna Forrestall

Comment: This fails GNG. The coverage in reliable sources http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/discovery-touts-wallenda-live-klondike-433005, http://variety.com/2012/film/news/louisiana-fest-taps-dowd-ireland-1118063283/ is restricted to passing mentions. The other sources which do have significant coverage are unfortunately all local sources (and even them some of them are interviews, and hence primary sources). http://deepsouthmag.com/2013/06/17/southern-fried-homicide/ This seemed OK at first glance, but it seems this is a newly established "online only magazine" which I tend to consider as . The subject wouldn't pass  either. I also think this is . At this moment, not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:ENT||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I've done some clean up and added added a few more references.  met. Article needs expansion and not deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)