Deletion of Uberfic (2nd nomination)

Comment: The application of  has changed considerably since 2005; AFDs from that period make |poor precedent.  The article does not cite |reliable sources, and, moreover, does not address the demands of .  A '''merge''' to Fan fiction terminology is also a possibility, although given the state of that article, such a course of action may just be postponing matters
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CCC||WP:RS||WP:NEO)

Comment: per above. No evidence from |reliable sources that  is met, nn neologism, http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=hMJ&q=Uberfic+-wikipedia&btnG=Search&meta= 879 non-wiki ghits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NEO)