Deletion of Artanada

Comment: obviously. The nominator is on a misguided crusade about notability. The nominator says "it is impossible to find any sources on it". There are numerous secondary sources to the town's existence: including https://pleiades.stoa.org/places/648572/artanada Pleiades and the sources cited in the article. A town still being written about over a thousand years later is clearly notable. In addition, Google Scholar has may articles about the excavations and other archaeology done there https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=artanada&btnG= . Clearly the nominator hasn't read  and seems to ignore that being a gazetteer is the first of the |Five Pillars of Wikipedia. I'm not going to go through this effort for each of the nominations this user has made below as the effort is not worth keeping articles if the community doesn't want to but suffice to say that according to  these are the efforts the nominator should have gone through before nominating
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:5P||WP:BEFORE)