Deletion of Bankrupt (band)

Comment: Having a quick look over the sources listed in the article I can see that they would not (well, in my books) classify as |reliable. They are composed of unreliable news sources, fan websites and a blog post. Running a quick google search turns up the classic "myspace   own website   irrelevant" results and a google news search turns up nothing relevant, reading over |band notability guidelines, there is no evidence of reliability via sources and the band is not with a notable label. Because of these things, I think the band fails |band notability criteria. — '''^.^''' &#91
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BAND||WP:BAND)

Comment: due to lack of references from |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Have you read 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)

Comment: Five new sources have been added, and quotes from reviews suggesting that the band also qualifies for notability criterion no.7. of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Other language Wikipedias aren't considered |reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)