Deletion of On Ayn Rand

Comment: The |general notability guideline asserts that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." Would the nominator care to explain how the references in the article are not reliable or independent, or how the coverage is not significant according to Wikipedia convention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Ayn Rand or Criticisms of Objectivism (Ayn Rand). Unlike the nominator, I don't expect that minor books on a |currently-popular minor philosopher will become "major" "perhaps in 30 years". The COI issue also indicates a non-notable work, as does the tarting-up with review links
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: this nomination just proves that any article, no matter how well referenced, can be deleted by editors who have done nothing to improve the article before nominating the article for deletion, in violation of the policy . In addition to the already well referenced article, I found http://books.google.com/books?q=%22On+Ayn+Rand%22+%22Allan+Gotthelf+%22 6 google book references to this book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)