Deletion of Judi McLeod

Comment: thanks to the  work from{{u|E.M.Gregory
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN)

Comment: meets , .  Her firing from her job as a reporter in 1983 caused a flap that got INDEPTH coverage at the time, and has been discussed since, for example,  in a book by philosophy professor Randal Marlin that I just added to the page.  Some of the 1983 articles have bio details that could be used to expand article.  Plus her writing gets cited pretty widely, which is what notability for a journalist is all about.  '''Note''' that I tagged Nom as a SPA, a brand new editor who, given the strong sourcing in article and the highly political nature of McLeod's writing, appears to be  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NOTHERE)

Comment: The only genuinely serious claim of notability here, the blip of media coverage she got in 1983 for being fired from ''The Brampton Times'', just makes her a . She doesn't have ''any'' genuinely substantive coverage about her outside of that context — all of the other sources here are either her publication's own |self-published content about itself, or glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage whose ''subject'' is somebody ''other'' than her. This is not the stuff, or the sourceability status, that makes for permanent enduring |ten-year test-passing encyclopedic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:SELFPUB||WP:10YT)