Deletion of Nancy Cruickshank

Comment: meets GNG. Implication that she is an inexperienced entrepreneur is unfounded.  would have shown RS showing that she has history going back long before current start up, thus notability has not been fleeting. Appreciate the analysis by {{u|Timtrent}} and also find http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/article/1026505/telegraph-unveils-online-fashion-shopping-site, http://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/oct/02/nationalmagazinecompany.pressandpublishing, http://www.theguardian.com/media/2007/feb/12/mondaymediasection12 showing web coverage going back to 2006. Article could definitely use editing, but notability does not rely on a well-written article nor sources being cited. The guidelines say that sources must exist. Sufficient evidence has been provided to show that RS do exist to confirm her notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)