Deletion of 100 People Who Are Screwing Up America

Comment: I think this book has more notable because it acts as a Rorschach test (and/or red-rag-to-a-bull) for readers'/reviewers' views than for any literary value or profound insight -- which means that achieving NPOV will be problematical. However, the book clearly has generated significant third party coverage, so the attempt should be made -- and  weight needs to be given to these sources (and the complete list should probably be replaced by a simple EL to a reproduction of it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE)

Comment: but prune hard with a weed whacker. The book itself has some notability, but the article on it is just being used as an anti-liberal |coatrack
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Satisfies . Topic has received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)