Deletion of Bailout mentality

Comment: to Bailout.  It does appear to be a neologism (i.e. more than a protologism, but still only recently used) and probably unsuitable as an article title, but sources are cited, the results found on Google news are valid, and do specifically mention the phrase, and the content is more useful than some sections already in the bailout article.  ecentism|Recentism could be a problem, but the situation that resulted in the phrase being coined, and the criticism that is mentioned, is likely to have lasting notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Neologisms must go. Actually this is  anyway since it's trying to argue that the term is notable simply because it's been repeated in the news a few times
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)