Deletion of Redmine

Comment: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22redmine%22&cf=all Many google news results.  Given your http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Hatter87 contribution history, I'd caution you to disclose your  & to prevent anyone from thinking that you are just making a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:POINT)

Comment: The only reason to ''actually'' delete would be ''actual'' lack of notability, and I just don't see that.  In addition to the Information Week article, Redmine is also cited as an important tool in the book http://books.google.com/books?id=abNvyqPNWtgC&pg=PT444&dq=redmine+project+management&lr=|Ruby on Rails for Microsoft Developers by Antonio Cangiano, and there is also an entire book on Redmine, albeit in Japanese, http://books.google.com/books?id=GVdTVYqgwZcC&pg=PR1&dq=redmine+project+management&lr=|入門Redmine Linux/Windows対応 by 前田剛.  Given that these publishers and authors feel Redmine is worthy of note, I would say it rises at least to the level of some of the other articles linked from List of project management software.  It could still be debated whether or not the article is written like an advert or has insufficient citations and references, but there are different tags for each of those.  Not fD.  I would support
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Given that the nomination does not in fact address what ought to be addressed (they should discuss the subject rather than the imperfect state of the article) I would be inclined to dismiss the AfD immediately, with some stern words for the nominator. However, I do not see much potential here right now--the Google News search refered to above delivers, in my opinion, only one single hit that would pass the  muster, and that is http://www.informationweek.com/news/telecom/collaboration/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207001354&subSection=All+Stories the article from ''InformationWeek''. I am leaning toward delete, until there's more evidence that the subject has notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)