Deletion of Campaign for "romney" neologism

Comment: per eo.  Its a rather blatant attempt at trying to use wiki to increase the neologism's use, as opposed to an article on a term that has already established notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This wouldn't have received any traction if it wasn't for the Santorum word.  It has no independent notability, and I challenge any of the keep voters to show multiple reliable sources that discuss this word without Santorum.  The notability of this is solely based on Santorum and at the most it should have a small 1 sentence blip on that article.  This article is an attempt by a political opponent (I'm not referring to the article creator, I'm referring to the guy who created the 'verb') to game Wikipedia's notability guidelines in an effort to hit the top of Google search results.  At the very least, we should  delete this to prevent similar gaming and using Wikipedia for political slander in the future.  This isn't about  or , it's simply about misusing Wikipedia's google search results for political gain.--v/r
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:NPOV||WP:CENSOR)

Comment: Things made up in one day during political silly season to attack candidates for office are not worthy of standalone articles, this would be serious |undue weight to the fringiest of fringe criticism of the subject.  Sourcing is not the argument here.  At most, a mention in Romney's 2012 campaign article, but that is an issue for editors to take up locally.  Honestly, if this project retains this article, we lose anything remotely resembling neutrality and credibility
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)