Deletion of Antarctica cooling controversy

Comment: The delete source was from the ''Frontiers of Freedom Institute'', which has a clear POV and is not a great source for anything accurate and in my opinion didn't comply with . I still favour keeping the article in some form
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I don't think there is enough notable coverage to warrant the term 'controversy'. I'd rather it was titled ''Antarctica cooling theory'' and present it as a theory from all positions. The word 'controversy' to me is not neutral. My view is that some of Michael Crichton's theories verge on |fringe theories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: I did review  and , and fully agree that balance and neutrality is a must. So let me make some final comments (I hope): (1) Regarding the title: whether as an independent article or as part of another as
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT||WP:NOTABILITY)