Deletion of Parodies of Harry Potter (3rd nomination)

Comment: per the topic of Harry Potter parodies itself being a |valid and easily sourcable notable topic covered in http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Harry+Potter%22+%2Bparody&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=a news sources http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Harry%20Potter%22%20%2Bparody&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=np books http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Harry%20Potter%22%20%2Bparody&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps and scholars.  As was stated at the previous AFD, concerns are |fixable and the article expandable, with no mandate or requirement that it be done NOW.  The way we cover topics that may not themselves individually notable is to have them in a combination article that addresses the entire notable topic with sourcing of the indvidual elements. |Being able to then ourselves see the |wide and persistant coverage available is not OR.  The inclusion criteria are not indescriminate.  And per  there is far too much |sourced information to place in some other article.  A list with specific inclusion criteria is neither "arbitrary" nor "miscellaneous", and as as a demonstrably notable topic, this one serves the project and its readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:GNG||WP:SPLIT||WP:V)