Deletion of Still Pending (3rd)

Comment: I am not sure if a salt is necessary but I wouldn't object to it as the article has been recreated. As for the previous nominations, they are not a test to be "passed" and the fact that the article was not deleted previously only means there was not sufficient consensus at the time. It is for that reason that articles can be renominated in the first place. As for the speedy deletion being overturned, that means absolutely nothing. If you look at the |criteria for speedy deletion, you will see that they are very strict, and that MOST articles that could qualify for deletion should not be speedily deleted. In fact, the only things speedy deletions come into play for is when an article doesn't even claim notability. Claiming notability at all, without a source, and regardless of the legitimacy of the claim, is supposed to negate speedy. One self published CD and an appearance in a children's theater production does not equate to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Sorry for changing my !vote twice, but on closer examination, there do seem to be enough reliable sources for this band to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)