Deletion of ADERANT

Comment: unless independent and non-trivial sources can be found to demonstrate that this company meets our generally accepted |inclusion criteria.  The sources provided so far do not meet those standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: how is a multi-national company not notable? Also since Thomson Corporation is apparently unchallenged for notability, and ADERANT is it's major competitor,  would suggest it should be included as well for balance. I think this is a case of anti-commercial bias creating an unrealistic standard for inclusion of company articles. I am by no means an inclusionist who would want to see articles about every sole-proprietorship, but obviously this company's products are well known in it's industry, so the subject is inherently notable, and better references probably exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: No |reliable sources shown to make it |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)