Deletion of Richard Machowicz

Comment: Seems the nominator brought this one here because it was |poorly written, had poor references, had |not been as actively edited as he might prefer,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Machowicz&action=history and should perhaps then be reduced to a stub.  I agree it's in a poor state, but we #REASON|do not delete what can be fixed.  In looking at the numerous available sources, many in depth, we see that this fellow has been written of many times over a many years period.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Richard+Machowicz%22+-Wikipedia&tbs=bks%3A1&hl=en&spell=1&sa=X&oq=%22Richard+Machowicz%22+-Wikipedia&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=12&gs_upl=1801703l1804734l0l1810406l11l11l0l7l0l0l110l110l0.1l1l0http://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&tbs=ar%3A1&hl=en&q=%22Richard%20Machowicz%22&spell=1&sa=X  That leads me to see that  is met.  While appreciating the nominator's concerns, we do not delete notable topics simply because the article needs work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UGLY||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:DEL||WP:GNG)