Deletion of List of celebrity hairdressers

Comment: per Postdlf (who posted my thought exactly). Satisfies . The scope of the article should read so that it is limited to people who have their own Wikipedia articles and whose primary fame is associated with hairdresser. Not everyone listed in :Category:Hairdressers will qualify to be listed in the article. The article should be renamed List of hairdressers as we usually keep "notable", "celebrity", "important", etc. out of article titles since the topic has to be notable to be in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: For policy reasons ( etc.) already cited by other keep voters. Of course, I can see the point of the underlying rationale for this AfD: fashion and grooming is a trivial, not particularly intellectual topic, which ought to have no place at Wikipedia. It is for this reason we expend so much virtual ink on X-Files episodes, MMA/UFC fighters and Pokémon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: WP:ENCYCLOPEDIA|Not encyclopedic, neither Wikipedia is a directory as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: to list of hairdressers since we currently do not have a list of notable hairdressers, and the article introduction/rationale now refers to hairdressers in general not merely cutters of celebrity hair.  It's reasonable to have a list of notable hairdressers that also includes any notable people whose hair they've cut. People arguing for deletion should read  which clearly states that having a category is not reason to delete the list.  A list of hairdressers would easily pass  and related policies, so there's no reason to delete this
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:L)

Comment: I don't see a real problem here, perhaps it was not well explained in the nomination. The ''title'' appears a bit problematic with "celebrity hairdressers" in it. It seems to suggest that any hairdresser who worked on a celebrity should be in it. The ''content'' however seems adequate for a . It includes only hairdressers which are themselves notable (for their work, which may of course include that on celebrities
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADIRECTORY)

Comment: and rename to List of hairdressers, per Postdlf, Uzma, etc., as long as it's ''crystal clear'' that this is not a list of people who have dressed the heads of celebrities (per ). I'm a guy, and don't give a shit about the topic, but you know what? The deletion nomination does seem to act to confirm our gender bias here. --Special:Contributions/165.189.32.4|165.189.32.4
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS)