Deletion of Dissident Voice (third nomination)

Comment: Whether Alexa rankings and Ghits alone satisfy  I will not debate, but as pointed out above peristently fails to be referenced and does not satisfy .  If it really is ''that'' notable then sourcing should be easy - that it's gone so long without tells me there is no reason to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATT)

Comment: It's been eight months since the most recent nomination.  In all that time, it hasn't progressed beyond the unsourced stub that existed back then, and has had all of about three meaningful edits.  Arkyan's reasoning is sound, and frankly, I'm unimpressed with the argument in previous AfDs that dissident publications have a hard time finding sources which satisfy .  Notable ones manage just fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)