Deletion of Plot of Naruto: Shippūden (2nd nomination)

Comment: The difference between an article on, say Gone with the Wind (film) and this is that the former shows how the movie was received, the historical context, the racism, etc. It has an analysis, not just a description of the plot. This article, on the other hand, just has a plot summary, and #PLOT|Wikipedia is not a collection of plot summaries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Article is just plot summary and fails #PLOT by design
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per policies such as .  A short plot summary is fine as part of a general article.  This by name is just a plot summary and is outside guidelines.  Many of the keep comments are based on other articles that are still on Wikipedia.  Per  that is no basis to keep this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:INN)

Comment: What I mean is that keep the sections that the anime has not reached yet, retaining the information of the manga. When the anime reaches that particular story arc, then delete it. Apply this to List of Naruto episodes. The information was the same in Plot of Naruto, but it was deleted when the anime reached to that particular point in the manga. This should be the same for Plot of Naruto: Shippūden. Let's retain the information until the anime reaches to that particular point of the manga. After all, this will comply with the #PLOT and it would contain information on where the manga is up to that the anime has not reached yet. Then Wikipedia would still contain information similar to an encyclopaedia and comply with copyright rules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: BLATANT violation of #PLOT.   Wikipedia is not the place for plot summaries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:NOT#PAPER/
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)