Deletion of Divas Lip Sync Live (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article meets requirements for  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEPISODE)

Comment: Why was this renominated after the previous AfD? It does not appear that any  was done. This article meets GNG as well as the (admittedly vague) requirements at . Plenty of standalone coverage in RS and can be easily expanded. Low page views is not an argument for non-notability. Lots of FAs get fewer than 27 views per day (see, for example, Ferugliotheriidae). This, and the nominator's other points, have already been addressed at the previous AfD, where keep !votes were unanimous. Nothing has changed since then, apart from the article being improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NEPISODE)

Comment: For this subject, we've got notable people portraying notable people on a notable show. In the way of coverage, there's definitely ample coverage to meet notability requirements, including the ''New York Times'' https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/02/arts/television/rupauls-drag-race-all-stars-season-3-episode-2-recap.html here; ''Pride'' https://www.pride.com/rupaulsdragrace/2018/2/02/divas-showed-and-showed-all-stars-3-last-night here; and others already used on the article. I'd also like to remind editors of , which states "Simply because a page is not of interest to Wikipedia readers does not mean it is not notable." It doesn't matter if it's 27 or 27,000 readers a day; the article should be judged on its notability (which I think is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOBODYREADSIT)

Comment: I'm not a fan of these episode articles that say very little beyond what happened in the episode, and a couple of sentences of critical reception. However, this episode (and the others listed by the nominator) does meet the GNG by having coverage in independent, secondary sources. |I may not like it, but that isn't a reason to delete something, nor is a lack of page-views, as discussed above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)