Deletion of Kidnapping in Islamism (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nom is a sock.Articles are normally only deleted for problems with content |if they are unsalvageable issues of original research and neutrality problems can be solved through regular editing .The subject is notable now whether one has a separate article for Kidnapping in Islamism or merge this with a  new general article of Kidnapping in Terrorism is not a reason for deletion.If there is issue with the title that can be subject to a |requested move
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:RM)

Comment: The notability of the topic is clearly established by the references provided in the article, including for example the book "Islamic Terror Abductions in the Middle East" by Shay. The references discuss this topic as such, so it's not synthesis. The objections seem to be mainly about , but that is not a reason to delete the article. Articles are supposed to be improved to accord with that policy, not be deleted. While kidnapping is a tactic that has been used by numerous armed groups throughout history, and there is not much essentially different about kidnappings by islamists versus those by people of other religions or ideologies, kidnappings by islamist groups have attracted attention as a specific phenomenon and been discussed in that way, which justifies having this article. In the same way, it could be justified to have an article on kidnappings in Colombia, bombings in Ireland, suicide attacks by Japanese in World War 2, and so forth, because these were significant phenomena even though numerous different groups, including many that are well-regarded by most people today, have used the same tactics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: If the article were changed to "kidnapping in terrorism" or something similar, as some editors have suggested, that likely ''would'' lead to a violation of . As it stands the topic of the article is notable in its own right
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)