Deletion of Graham Phillips (journalist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Articles on wikipedia should be determined by their notability, and only that, not by bias of certain wikipedia editors against them. Phillips clearly meets notability criteria as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I'm the one who listed it for AfD, so I will just reiterate issues with this article: the person ''barely'' satisfies  if stretched, but also goes against  and . The article was written in self-promotional style, inflated with links to non-notable  sources, mostly YouTube videos of Phillips himself, some personal details (like that on cars) were completely unsourced indicating insider knowledge and personal relationship to the subject. The article is being pushed by a single IP user that didn't even have time/interest to register an account for over a month but is very vocal on this discussion, along with a number of other IP users. All other participants note low quality of the article. Edits so kindly made by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:PERP||WP:ENT||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: The sources on the page look like easily enough to meet |general notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)