Deletion of Miyoko Akashi (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to |verify or |sustian article. Fails |Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. As a side note: the argument that Ambassadors are 'representatives of the people' and should be presumed notable based on  requires a gross misreading on NPOL particularly noting that most Ambassadors are appointed civil servants or, from less developed or politically inclusive countries, sinecures. While it is arguable that there is not consensus that Ambassadors are not presumed notable there is certainly no consensus that they are and that is what is required to make them not subject to GNG. So it is a distinction without a difference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: As was the case two years ago when the article was last discussed at AFD, the article still lacks in-depth coverage to demonstrate actual notability as mandated by |the General Notability Guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Ambassadors, unlike politicians, are appointed. There's no inherent notability, and this particular diplomat does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)