Deletion of 3D Solar

Comment: Meet the notability threshold per guidelines.  The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. 18 academies of science have reviewed the technology and presented the ICT prize since the quality of the source can't have a higher grade for such technology.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: While this is not a candidate for speedy deletion due to the claims of notability made in the article, the company does not pass  or .  There is a single independent source in the article, and that is the only one I can find.  3D Solar search returns mostly a new type of solar panel, not related to the company.  Searching for 3D Solar + the owner's name returns wikipedia and wikipedia mirror hits, the 3D solar web page and a number of press releases.  No indication of notability, but that doesn't mean in the next few years the company won't make a name for themselves.  Patents simply do not confer notability on their own, as they are essentially a primary source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CORP)