Deletion of Under the Shadow

Comment: They must meet |these criteria, which they do not appear to do. You also need sources to prove that they have met said criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I looked at the article and failed to see an assertion that it meets any  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Miyamoto is known world-wide by many people. A small band known locally to some people within that region is not notable. The Wikipedia is a general encyclopedia, and doesn't include every little group of people everywhere on the planet; it only includes those things which are notable. There's a reason the criteria on usic exist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)

Comment: as the above comments make perfectly clear.  "Up and coming" bands are not appropriate for Wikipedia.  Only established bands should be here.  Wikipedia is not in the business of free advertising.  Please see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: You're not comprehending something very important here. The Wikipedia doesn't just keep articles on every topic under the sun because it can. The Articles for Deletion process is largely to get rid of articles of subjects that don't have enough notability. You seem to want the band to get a wiki article just because it can. If that worked, my left foot would have an article (and I must admit it did; for a few minutes, and not of my own creating). Read  and otability. The Wikipedia seeks to have articles only on things of encyclopedic value
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)