Deletion of Osklen

Comment: In its present form the article is in very poor shape.  It is |unreferenced, |unverifiable, fails to prove |notability and seems rather |spammy.  As it stands now it is a strong delete.  However, the news hits uncovered above seem to me to address the verifiable references problem and appear, to me at least, to assert a sufficient amount of notability.  If someone (i.e. not me) was interested enough to put out the time and effort, I think this article could be rewritten into a keeper
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:ORG||WP:ADVERTISING)