Deletion of Jessica Meir

Comment: Simply fails , the sources about her are almost all connected to her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The nomination seems to make a case for how this article may not meet , but the number of write-ups in popular science sources such as http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2011/04/15/skys-no-limit-in-high-flying-goose-chase US News & World Report, http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/70113/title/FOR_KIDS_Secrets_of_the_worlds_extreme_divers ScienceNews, http://www.livescience.com/14091-modern-mother-goose-attempts-unravel-flight-bar-headed-goose.html LiveScience and http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/science/extreme-trekkers-citizen-scientists/article581109/ Globe & Mail suggest that Meir is worthy of notice anyway, passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR||WP:BIO)

Comment: There seems to be a consensus that Meir does not pass . I would concur, adding that WoS shows an h-index of 8 and no highly-cited papers, which is about what one would expect for an early-in-career academic. I think  is problematic too because most of sources are actually either web-pages or non-published docs, e.g. NASA and NSF PR. The one exception is the US News piece, but this still falls short of the "multiple sources" commonly expected. If the article ''is'' kept, it will have to be overhauled to remove , which actually comprises most of the article. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:OR)