Deletion of Ken Goldstein (2nd nomination)

Comment: Subject seems |notable- article well sourced. Goldstein was mentioned in the Variety article multiple times. As observed by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article was adequately and quite well sourced at the time of nomination, easily aserting and showing |notability through |multiple reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Goldstein is discussed substantively in this article in the Jewish Review (http://www.planetillogica.com/kengoldstein#tab:Portfolios&portfolio:46564&media:46565), and in the Oregonian article, which can be found at http://www.planetillogica.com/kengoldstein#tab:Portfolios&portfolio:46564&media:46562, both of which support a claim of notability, and both of which are reliable sources under Wikipedia rules (See otability and ).  These are multiple articles from multiple sources, which satisfies Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline.  A nomination for deletion is not appropriate under these circumstances, as the subject satisfies our notability rules by being described substantively in these multiple sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)