Deletion of Zech Zinicola

Comment: per Muboshgu's expansion of the article, which includes sources that demonstrate the subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: it may fail , but it clearly passes  from the sources above, which is more than enough for an article. Not sure why it was relisted again, since there are only 2 delete votes that expand on a "not notable" vote, to be honest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBASEBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Appears not to meet , , or anything in between
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBASEBALL)

Comment: while the prod/de-prod history might not encourage the usual  checks, they probably would have helped in this particular case. I think the sources provided by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I can't believe people are voting to keep this based on a PED suspension and a couple minor stories about the player being promoted between leagues, which happens hundreds if not thousands of times per year. If this player passes , then 98% of minor league players, managers, and coaches pass , including dozens of players whose most noteworthy "achievement" was being suspended for PEDs. These Baseball AfDs are becoming grudge matches rather than places of consistent voting and policy. Some of the same people voting Keep here have, just within the past few weeks, voted Delete on articles with far more citations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)