Deletion of Penis game

Comment: I admit I do not like this article, and I have never heard of the game. But Wikipedia is not censored, and "liking" something is not a requirement in the |notability guideline. A Google News archive search http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22penis+game%22&num=10&as_price=p0&sa=N&start=10 shows a few refs which have substantial coverage of this game.   Some refs are not about this innocuous inanity, but are inappropriate touching, comparison of equiment, or indecent exposure. But very much on topic are  http://media.www.smudailycampus.com/media/storage/paper949/news/2006/02/03/TheMix/Stacy.Looks.On.The.Brighter.Side.Of.Male.Immaturity-2276950.shtml , http://media.www.redandblack.com/media/storage/paper871/news/2007/08/23/OutAbout/superbad.A.Dirty.Pleasure.For.Opening.Weekend.Audience-2934692.shtml http://media.www.jhunewsletter.com/media/storage/paper932/news/2004/11/12/Features/Some-Pillow.Talk.That.Wont.Put.Your.Partner.To.Sleep-2244075.shtml (Do campus papers count for satisfying "multiple reliable and independent sources?"). Since variant versions in other countries/languages are claimed to be part of the article, there could be additional references. The BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_4180000/newsid_4188100/4188145.stm and a paper in Wales http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-131957250.html had some coverage of "Bogey game," but BBC talking about a BBC program is not very "independent."  (edited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per the multiple third party sources cited by Edison and others.  I too believe there is sufficient  to sustain an article, this simply needs to be flagged for rescue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: no sources, |Wikipedia is not for something you made up one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)