Deletion of Zhisheng Niu

Comment: Fellow of IEEE, the very thing the nomination complains about, is explicitly given in #C3 as an example of an honor that would make someone notable by that criterion. If you don't like the criterion, lobby to change it, but with the criterion as it is, there is no valid nomination.  #3 calls for speedy keep when "The nomination is so erroneous that it indicates the nominator has not even read the article in question"; here we have something different, a nomination so erroneous that it indicates the nominator has not even read the notability guideline, but I think the reasoning is the same
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:SK)

Comment: Prototypical pass of #C3.  (Also https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gnxgnwQAAAAJ&hl=en 6000+ GS citations and an h-index of 37
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)