Deletion of List of red-light districts (2nd nomination)

Comment: list is discriminate/clearly meets , and  isn't violated at all as this isn't presented anything close to a travel guide would be. Cleanup can happen on the page d'talk
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTTRAVEL)

Comment: Having gone through the first two sections of the article, Africa & Asia (about 30% of the article), reference by reference, the majority use the term "red-light district" within the reference. Based on this, the nominator's "most of the entries on this list" seems an overstatement. Where the references did not specifically mention red-light district I have in most cases added additional references that do use that terminology. I will continue through the article, so the question of is calling an "area of prostitution" a "red-light district"  or  becomes irrelevant. Similarly the "List of places where prostitution has occurred" rather than "List of red-light districts" issue is resolved
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: Compliant with  and .  is irrelevant as this is not a list of people. All entries are either wikilinked to articles or referenced. Because the references do not specifically use the term "Red-light district" does not make this  or  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:LISTN||WP:NLIST||WP:OR||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: An important topic for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality/Sex work task force|sex work task force. The sources demonstrate that it is . It does not have the level of detail to violate 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:NOTTRAVEL)