Deletion of Id fresh foods

Comment: Forbes India'', ''Mashable'', and ''Quartz'' sources show notability to a wider audience than local news. ''Deccan Herald'' is a weaker source as it is local, but it's nontrivial coverage as well. The other sources seem to be promotional (e.g. ''ETtech'') or press releases or routine coverage of registered businesses (e.g. ''Crunchbase''), but the sources above seem to indicate non-local notability sufficient to meet . Promotional concerns can be fixed with editing; it doesn't seem to be a |blow it up and start over case, and some editors have been working on editing for tone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TNT)

Comment: One good source (Forbes India), all others are routine business coverage (rewritten press releases). Not enough to make it notable. At best, could consider |userfy, maybe in few years they'll get a second good article or some awards or something. For now,  at best - your usual  creation by a undisclosed paid editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY||WP:TOOSOON||WP:CORPSPAM)