Deletion of Pro Wrestling Australia

Comment: Hi, looking other deletion proposals around here, I think https://www.kotaku.com.au/2020/02/australias-wrestling-scene-is-creating-world-class-stars/ and https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/how-australian-grapplers-are-making-wrestling-cool-again-20190219-p50ypw.html can suffice for the so called . They are more than passing mentions. smaller mentions are https://www.supanova.com.au/handy-guide-australias-local-wrestling-scene/ and https://medium.com/my-muscle-chef/pro-wrestling-australia-call-to-arms-and-gains-a3edf21dec1c (this one is funny) too. I vote '''keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Leaving aside the fact that the article is totally refbombed with 58 sources, most are PRIMARY sources. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, they are all promotional and/or PRIMARY and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)