Deletion of WWE Raw 1000 (2nd nomination)

Comment: Passes  with significant coverage from likes of EW and USA Today (and coverage for its ratings). Although there is a lot of primary/passing/unneccessary mentions that needs to be cleaned up as this article was under clear 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:REFBOMBING)

Comment: Are we really gonna fight this again? The event at the time was promoted like a WWE PPV event. It was a supercard on basic cable. The sourcing supports that, and that's why it was kept in the first place. The nominator's insinuation that it doesn't have lasting impact can be applied to a lot of WWE PPVs. But let's avoid an  argument. Rather, the point remains that it has the sourcing to remain it's own article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)