Deletion of Bridge Airlines

Comment: The size of an article is |not a reason to nominate it for deletion, and has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not something is notable. Aside from which scheduled airlines are considered universally notable by |consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:TOOLITTLE||WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: since subject fails  and . The text has been Special:Contributions/Ardfern|evidently created by an  airline enthusiast and their efforts are, at least by me, applauded. But |Wikipedia is not a depository or all-inclusive, random information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: No evidence of  found in my , and hence fails . Aviation safety is a database, not RS, and even if it were RS does not give signficant coverage to the subject, and even if it were thought to give significant coverage, more than one source is required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)