Deletion of Beth Willman

Comment: I'm inclined for deletion on this one. A good faith search by me turned up no more independent references that discuss her, other than the ones listed in the article. Those, by the way, are not even about her, so it's a stretch to call that "significant coverage" of the subject (William). I think there's many ways of interpreting the |academic notability criteria, and even with the above discussion of impact factors and H-indices, I'm not convinced this subject has had a great enough impact on the field nationally or internationally to warrant an article. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: According to gscholar she has a H-index of 44, which based on a random sampling appears to fairly typical for members of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey collaboration. She also has a handful of papers with 200+ citations, on two of which she is the first author. This probably puts here over the bar of #C1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)