Deletion of Louisiana Missionary Baptist Institute and Seminary (2nd nomination)

Comment: The claim that the seminary awards doctorates is sourced to a local pastor's autobiography on his church's website, which only claims to he has the degree. Hardly a  to assert the seminary currently offers those degrees. How can we have an article about this place offering degrees without third-party sources that say it does
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Per  and , that is not notable nor acceptable as a source. A local pastor's autobiography is not notable nor is it beyond trival. As  says, "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Has this place been mentioned by people other than a few local pastors who attended it or the two local churches tied to it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL||WP:RS)

Comment: Actually, rticles for deletion/Common_outcomes#Education| We do obsess.  Even ACCREDITED institutions can be subject to AFD.  Unaccredited institutions have always been held to the standard of having to prove notability.  You can open up an unaccredited college in your basement by simply saying it is one, thus the declaration itself doesn't carry notability by itself, which is why we require independent verification and sourcing.  Additionally, the standard for notability is not any lower for an unaccredited institution just because it is affiliated with a church or religion of any kind.  This isn't new here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Failure to meet the |general notability guideline by an absence of independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)