Deletion of Southern Halo (band)

Comment: If consensus is to delete, I urge the closing admin to incubate the article back to the Draft: namespace instead of delete it outright. Yes, |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. However, it is not improbable that the band will become notable under WP:BAND #2 or #11 once its single is released. To that end, we're better off to have the text to be working on, rather than having to start from scratch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: No reputable sources provided, and none of the sources provided speak to notability. 1st reference is self-published, 2nd doesn't mention them, 3rd doesn't even provide enough information to unambiguously identify a source, 4th is just a calendar entry. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I don't agree with the nominator that "Tagged with {{notability}}" is a valid reason for deletion (there are over 60,000 such articles).  However, this band does not appear to meet any of the notability criteria outlined in  and most of the references are not independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)