Deletion of Public Perception of Jared Kushner

Comment: per nom. Appears to be a , and the material is already sufficiently covered at {{Section link|Jared Kushner|Controversies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: obvious  that does not need a stand-alone article. I agree with nom that the content makes more sense on :Jared Kushner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per nom for obvious reasons as stated above by other editors. This is a blatant case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: with Jared Kushner.  A lot of the statements in this  are cited. Truly,  coverage of him tends to point out a lot of highly unfavourable facts, and  requires neutral editing, not neutral content.  We don't have to censor things that ought to embarrass the subject of a BLP if they're well-cited to a reliable source.  Calling something an  when it cites 24 sources including several national newspapers and broadcast news networks is a stretch and speedy isn't appropriate.  But on a purely editorial basis, documentation of the public behaviour of Kushner and journalistic perceptions of it should be confined to Jared Kushner.  Otherwise what is the article on Kushner even about
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:ATTACKPAGE)

Comment: redundant fork; whether it's a POV fork or just a redundant , it's still a redundant fork. By all means, add to the relevant section of Jared Kushner (if there is even that much to add). The article creator understands that this is a community decision. Nothing of value needs to be lost here. Nobody is saying that the information should be censored or deleted, it just doesn't warrant a separate article. "Public perception of ___" would only be justifiable in an extremely rare number of cases and I'm not seeing that here. Part of editing also involves identifying what content is important and what doesn't need to be added. Of course, there are hundreds of articles that mention Kushner but we don't need to add every single inane detail. This is, after all, a general and global encyclopaedia not Trumppedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK)