Deletion of Movebubble (2nd nomination)

Comment: the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movebubble|previous decision was no consensus existed for deletion. I don't see why circumstances will have changed since that decision. It clearly has some independent and substantive coverage in major papers and websites, but not enough to make it undeniably notable. Yet there doesn't seem to be an overriding sense of churnalism or dependency on press releases to justify deletion either. The first deletion debate still seems relevant and I don't see the purpose of a second. Editors should refocus and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM)

Comment: Fails and  Most of the sources only mention the subject in passing. The sources which are about the subject are prime examples of PR Churnalism and do not impart the depth of coverage required for a serious encyclopaedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)