Deletion of Chain smoking

Comment: The nominator wants references?  I just added a couple - it was easy as there are http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=+%22chain+smoking%22&hl=en&lr=&start=10&sa=N thousands of sources out there.  Image:Life_Preserver.svg|16px   is not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: and merge to Smoking or to Tobacco smoking. The  concerns are valid but this topic is not yet ready to be broken out. No prejudice against making it an article when someone is ready to write a good one at Chain smoking
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:LENGTH)

Comment: Plenty of |reliable sources can be found http://books.google.com/books?q=%22chain+smoking%22&um=1&ie=ISO-8859-1&output=html&as_brr=0 here, http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22chain%20smoking%22&um=1&ie=ISO-8859-1&sa=N&hl=en&tab=ps here, and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22chain+smoking%22&cf=all here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: or redirect to Smoking '''Keep or merge into Smoking''' ''(new sources found; see below)''. The mentioned "sources" don't seem to provide any actual information about the phenomenon. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22was%20drinking%20beer "was drinking beer" returns 525 Google Scholar and 2,450 Google News results. According to that logic, was drinking beer would also easily pass both  and . If there are no sources that specifically address the subject—and I couldn't find such sources myself—I'd say it clearly falls under OTDIC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:NOTDIC)

Comment: The main problem with this article is that it is short; it simply has not been written. But there is a lot that can be written based on the hundreds of available sources. Being a |stub or otherwise a short article is not grounds for deletion. On Wikipedia, Wikipedia:There is no deadline|there is no deadline when it comes to page construction. Deleting this article would be Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built|demolishing the house while it is still being built. This is a classic case of an article that Wikipedia:Give an article a chance|needs to be given a chance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB)