Deletion of Black knight

Comment: The nomination seems incoherent and fails to establish a clear case for deletion rather than article improvement per our |editing policy.  I have added a citation to demonstrate that the topic is notable and such improvement is possible.  The worst case is merger with the dab page as it seems beyond question that the title of the article is a useful search term for the numerous literary examples of black knights
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: The question here is whether |reliable sources can be found to establish some sort of thematic or other connection between the many characters so identified—in Chaucer, in Lydgate, in Malory, and elsewhere in fiction. Offhand, I'm not aware of any, and the crucial section of the article in its present form ("Historical significance") certainly seems to constitute unsourced, and unpersuasive, |original research. Stuff like http://books.google.com/books?id=CGIMAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA37&dq=%22Black+Knight%22&lr= this doesn't really qualify, since it would support nothing but an indiscriminate list of characters sharing a "name." If someone can come up with some solid sources upon which an article can be reared, I'm quite willing to recommend that this be kept; but if no such sources are forthcoming, I can't see the good of it. (And if anyone adds a ''Phineas and Ferb'' entry to the "Literary use" section, I'll be upset
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)