Deletion of List of fictional locations in the Godzilla films

Comment: Fails  as there are no reliable sources that actually discuss the concept of fictional locations from the franchise as a group or set.  While it looks like it is well sourced at a glance, actually looking at those sources show that they are basically just plot summaries or very brief mentions on some of the films in which some of the individual locations appeared in.  There is a pretty heavy case of ing here as well, as the same handful of sources are being used as inline citations multiple times in a single sentence or paragraph
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: I am not currently active on Wikipedia, but I worked on this article a bit in the past when it was PRODed. The person who applied the PROD at that time was sufficiently satisfied with the sources added that he did not pursue an AfD. The above two votes (the first of which seems to be creating his own criteria; the second of which falsely claims there are no reliable sources that discuss the subject beyond plot summary) ignore the fact that this article is well-sourced with |reliable, |verifiable, |secondary sources, which is the criteria by which |notability is determined. ''Some'' plot summary is to be expected in an article about fictional content, of course, but there are myriad examples in this article that go beyond plot summary, like Ishirō Honda discussing how budget restraints affected the settings, Yoshikuni Igarashi discussing how South Pacific locations reflect allegories of Japanese culture, inconsistencies between the appearances of same settings used in different kaiju films, etc. Also, it's worth noting that the sources used are only just a few available; you'll see I essentially stopped working on the article after Lagos Island after the PROD was pulled. The article can (and should) be improved more, but the fact that it's incomplete EGLECT|isn't a reason for deletion, and there is |no deadline for those improvements to be made. The reliable sources added to it so far are satisfactory to establish notability and that the article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:SECONDARY||WP:N||WP:NEGLECT||WP:DEADLINE)