Deletion of Kenyan invasion of Somalia (2011)

Comment: Those who have !voted "keep", please re-read the article. I've copy edited, so that the article is actually based on the sources. There was a considerable amount of completely false information in the version that you !voted to "keep. Both the article title and its (original) content are seriously in violation of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: mdash;it seems to me that notnewspaper is notapplicable.  that guideline seems to discourage ''first-hand news reports on breaking stories,'' which this article does not contain.  notnewspaper refers us to  to gauge the notability of recent events.  that guideline tells us that ''As Wikipedia is not a paper source, editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and the development of stand-alone articles on significant current events.''  on the other hand, it's possible for reasonable editors to disagree here about whether the event is notable, but i don't think that it can be decided on the basis of guidelines alone.  also, wp:persistence, cited by nominator as reason for deletion, does say ''That an event occurred recently does not in itself make it non-notable.'' (i'm not cherry-picking excerpts here, since i'm assuming everyone's going to read the guideline).  the nominator's point about the word "invasion" is well-taken, though.  should the article survive the afd, i support moving it to Kenyan incursion into Somalia (2011), unless future events moot the point.&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: WP is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: Clearly a notable event, given it's the first military action of this type engaged in by Kenya, and both its causes (the Al-Shabaab movement kidnapping people in Kenya, which is fairly new for them) and consequences (re the famine). I'm in Australia yet had casually heard about this on no less than three media sources today (ABC, NPR, BBC). A new name which reflects  and the facts on the ground would be a good idea, however - it's not an invasion as an invasion according to my dictionary involves subjugation and occupation, which isn't evident here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)