Deletion of Bullshit

Comment: Comparing this article to the one mentioned by the nom is, well, bullshit (there really should be a  to go with ). Just because an article is on a word, doesn't mean that it falls under , and this one certainly doesn't. Its written from an encyclopedic standpoint, not a dictionary one. Its also reasonably sourced, and I'm sure more can be added. In short, there's no reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOTDIC)

Comment: Covered adequately in Wiktionary. Anything useful that isn't there can be transwikied. #DICDEF
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)