Deletion of Michael D. Watkins

Comment: Plenty of reviews for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: meets  as a few of Watkins' books have numerous reviews and are entitled to own wikiarticles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I think he does pass #C1 and also (although I haven't taken the time to demonstrate it by finding published reviews) likely passes  through his many high-profile business-leadership books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: It's not immediately obvious from perusing Google Scholar that the subject passes, for example, criterion 1 of . On the other hand, he does have a respectable number of citations and is clearly not an anonymous professor without any significant impact. Comparing Watkins to the other scholars categorized in :Category:Negotiation scholars, his citation counts are comparable to those of Gerard Nierenberg, and better than Herb Cohen (negotiator)|Herb Cohen, Stuart Diamond, Leonard J. Marcus, and Ronald M. Shapiro. (This is just a first impression, not a definitive assessment, but if Watkins is deleted then those last three subjects may be candidates for deletion as well.) Perhaps an argument could be made that he passes , but someone would have to make that argument because it doesn't seem to be a ''prima facie'' case of academic notability. If someone wants to try to make that case, one good source of evidence, beyond the citation counts, would be reviews of his books in peer-reviewed journals (not in Harvard Business Review|HBR
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: his citation count would seem to meet , and appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOLAR||WP:NAUTHOR)