Deletion of Whiteness theory

Comment: I can see many academic sources for Whiteness Theory in books and journals - https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=S8Kf0N0XALIC&pg=PA1007#v=onepage&q&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HApaDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA89&dq=%22Whiteness+theory%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjRodvgjvrfAhXFQhUIHWlFBQsQ6AEISDAF#v=onepage&q=%22Whiteness%20theory%22%20-wikipedia&f=falsehttps://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/56/3/403/1707581https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0013-2004.2004.00002.xhttps://sites.otago.ac.nz/Sites/article/view/82https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10570310903279083, and it would appear to be something legitimately studied in academia. and should satisfy . The rationale for the AfD is faulty, and any other problems with its content should be dealt with in the article itself and AfD should not be the place to clean up articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)