Deletion of Killygordon railway station

Comment: Redirect''' There's a bunch of almost identical articles about these stations which carry almost no unique information: compare Cavan Halt railway station.  All this info could be presented in a table on Finn Valley Railway: instead of a bunch of articles which say "Station A serves town B was opened at time D and lies between E and F" you just have a list of stations in order, with location and opening date. If a station is really notable by Wikipedia standards (and a self-published book by a local historian doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability standards) then the article could be re-created.  says stations are "normally" notable, but not invariably so. If people believe this station is notable, they should provide references, as is standard policy in other Wikipedia deletion discussions
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:RAILOUTCOMES)

Comment: Per |long standing convention, all rail stations are notable, even if they're not longer operating.  It's difficult to see vowing to "mass nominate" as good faith effort as it is seldom so and never when it is opposed to |consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:RAILOUTCOMES||WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: I wasn't aware that yet another topic claimed "inherent notability" independent of sources and the |GNG. Anyway, this is meant as a test balloon on a class of very similar articles based on the same "source". If this is deleted, consensus would probably support deletion of the other similar articles, too - if it's kept, I won't bother with nominating any of the others, individually or collectively. See also 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AGF)