Deletion of Sezan Mahmud

Comment: I haven't formulated an opinion on his notability as an author, but thanks to Ragib I was able to look him up as a professor of medicine. Given his citations on Google scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=DF9ldAsAAAAJ, he does not appear to pass #C1, and I don't see any evidence of passing other  criteria, so if he is notable I think it would have to be only as an author
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: According to otability|Notability, and  policy and with the refernces check It is should be delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:AUTHOR||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: primarily on  grounds. Indeed, none of the awards claimed in the article check out when verification is attempted. The references given lead to either dead links or to pages that do not mention the subject, as, for example the reference citedhttps://web.archive.org/web/20080313114507/http://www.aacr.org/home/scientists/research-funding--training-grants/travel-grants/minority-serving-institution-faculty-scholar-awards/2008-minority-serving-institution-faculty-scholars-in-cancer-research-.aspx for the award by the American Public Health Association. A search for his namehttp://www.apha.org/search-results?q=Sezan%20Mahmud at that organization's website returns no results,  and the outcome is the same for a searchhttp://www.aacr.org/Pages/gcsresult.aspx?cref=http://cms.aacrtest.org/cref_cse.xml&q=%22Sezan%20Mahmud%22&sa=Search&siteurl=http://cms.aacrtest.org&ref=&ss=0j0j1#.V-KASTv7uWU at the website of the American Association for Cancer Research, where that award was referenced. Altogether, there are too many dubious  failing claims in the article, and they are too hard to separate from what is actually verifiable here, before we even get to the issue of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)