Deletion of Quantum Archeology

Comment: The tell-tale sign is that most of the references ''are admitted in the article'' to not be about this subject as such. Wikipedia has far too much text on fringy stuff as it is, but at least we have some proof that there is some persistent belief in it. A discussion on a forum is insufficient proof, and other than the discussion in the article, that's all there is. This is a textbook-ready example of the sort of thing  was intended to forbid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Absolutely no evidence (in the form of |reliable sources) that this is anything other than one guy's loony notion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)