Deletion of Lum the Mad (second nomination)

Comment: For those editors above who say that books are available, I'd say go ahead and add listings for those books to the article.  I may have access to them as well, but I'll echo what other people have said here, which is that AfD is not something that should be used as a tool for "Hurry and clean up the article right away."  If it's obvious that sources exist, and the consensus is that the article should be kept, then tag the article as needing cleanup (which I do agree it obviously needs), and let's move on.  There's no urgency involved.  See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: the revamp clearly demonstrates the notability of this person and passes  easily.  The reference to Something Awful on the otherhand is original research and should be removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I just completed a major overhaul of the article.  I removed some poorly-sourced information, added several new sources (thanks to everyone above that provided the ISBNs), and completely reorganized the rest of it.  As a caveat, I freely admit that I work in the online game industry, so my edits could be seen as potentially exhibiting a |conflict of interest. I encourage review and if necessary, change, of anything that I did
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I think the appropriate factor here is  and this doesn't work with it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)