Deletion of Chicken Invaders

Comment: This looks a useful article that has been sourced enough to meet . I see no particular reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Indeed, this is a notable game and the best of its type. This is a well written article that now has sources. It now meets  and other Wikipedia policies and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Apologies for the second change of mind, after examining the CNet/Download.com site and actual reviews I don't accept that it is a |reliable source, a couple of paragraphs and a rating out of 5 from an unnamed employee of a download site just doesn't cut it. Download.com is somewhere to download software, not obtain reliable reviews. GameSpot remains a good source, but others added to the article do not hold water
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This article provides no |verifiable sources to establish |notability. Does a review by the editors of CNET etsablish notability?  I don't think it does but may be wrong.  The other sources are either blog/wiki type mentions or the company's own website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)