Deletion of Hollywood Life

Comment: While the article's subject as currently defined probably passes  anyway, it's worth noting that the story in this article starts with the brand relaunch, rather than the current website's origins as a magazine/website in its Movieline days (see, e.g., https://variety.com/2003/film/news/movieline-warms-up-to-celebs-1117884449/) before the acquisition. ''Hollywood Life'' had RS coverage well before Fuller ever showed up. In other words, if there's any apparent notability issue, it's because the article is incomplete. It's possible that a multiple-page reorganization would provide a better service to readers, but that's an editing issue to discuss on article talk pages, not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are many sources e.g. in https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/business/media/17fuller.html New York Times, https://www.wsj.com/articles/bonnie-fuller-starts-to-trend-1379288075 Wall Street Journal (which has substantial coverage on the website as well as Bonnie Fuller), https://www.adweek.com/digital/bonnie-fuller-hollywood-life-wall-street-journal-william-launder/ Ad Week, https://adage.com/article/media/bonnie-fuller-s-hollywoodlife-hires-carlos-lamadrid/231052/ Adage, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/bonnie-fuller-run-hollywood-life-86644 Hollywood Reporter. There is also coverage on other aspects of the website e.g. here a Justin Bieber-inspired campaign - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/justin-bieber-urges-instagram-followers-to-shut-down-hollywoodlife-celebrity-website-a7085021.htmlhttps://www.aol.com/article/2016/06/15/justin-bieber-fights-media/21395799/https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2016/06/113955/justin-bieber-hollywood-life-ban. Should pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)