Deletion of Criticism of Tony Blair (2nd nomination)

Comment: While I am not a huge fan of "criticism of..." articles, I am even less fond of the censorship of any criticism of political figures. The article is well written, very well referenced and is clearly notable. Indeed, this is precisely the sort of critical information that someone researching Tony Blair would be interested in.  does not require us to sanitise all biographical articles to the point where living persons are portrayed as Saints
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Not a fan of Mr Blair, but this article is  and a  violation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as . I think there is a consensus around this area, that "criticism of..." articles are almost always magnets for blind POV, and naturally create a hostile and unduly negative perspective on a topic. If enough of these articles are deleted, it would be worth adding this to a guideline if not a policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Violation of , , & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Inherently one-sided and so contrary to |core policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)