Deletion of Bonanza Springs, California

Comment: Keep''' - Clearly meets  and "named natural features" of , sustained coverage in independent reliable sources over a period of years. This well-known Mojave Desert oasis is an important source of water source for the Southern California arid lands.  It is a Mojave Trails National Monument (California Landmark). While it may not be an important settlement, it definitely is an important spring (geographic/hydrological feature). There are many full articles on Newspapers.com on more historical info here: https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=Bonanza+Springs&p_province=us-ca – I haven’t yet searched on JSTOR. Below is what I’ve found on Google. I’ll add a few of the best sources to the article today or tomorrow
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: No http://pbbooks.com/caindex.htm post office.  Trivial coverage as a resort.  This non- https://middletownhistory.weebly.com/howard-continued.html blog mentions Bonanza, Howard and other resorts (apparently Bonanza had a liquor license, which made up for Bonanza's lack of facilities compared to other nearby resorts). I checked out some of {{u|SportingFlyer}}'s newspaper.com links and while there are many trivial mentions of Bonanza, I'm not seeing non-notable coverage.  To me, non-trivial coverage would be a non-promotional article that is solely about Bonanza in a  source.  Passing articles about water rates don't meet my definition of non-notable.  As there is no legal recognition and the coverage is trivial, neither #1 nor #2 of  are met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:GEOLAND)