Deletion of Bose stereo speakers

Comment: all for several reasons as outlined by the above !voters but first of all because there's no way this AfD is ever going to lead to any other result than keep or merge. Even if these should fail  they are likely search terms which should be kept as redirects as per the above !votes. Hence, there's no need for this AfD as you don't need AfD to start a merge discussion. Also, canvassing and group-nominating articles that aren't obvious candidates for deletion is not the way to get the outcome you were hoping for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and, if required, unbundle and relist. There are sufficient differences for these not to meet undle. I think, for example, that Bose wave systems are sufficiently innovative, and covered by reliable sources to be kept. Plenty of independent reviews http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=Bose+wave+system&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=uk&um=1&scoring=a here for example. Having said all this, the number of articles seem excessive covering the subjects in undue depth. EFORE requires us to look for alternatives to deletion and a combined page, with much of the detail removed, entitled Bose home audio products, or similar, should be considered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: sources indicate that the topics meet  and WP:N, which is all that we can ask. Batch nominations are seldom a good idea, particularly in instances like this. I would probably agree with others though that eventually key products and innovations should remain while lesser known ones are grouped together in a "List of..". Having said that, AfD is not cleanup. A couple of mergefrom/mergeto tags post AFD closure should eb sufficient to gain consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)