Deletion of Rapture (film)

Comment: I don't understand why this "upcoming film" does not have an entry at the IMDB or apparently independantly elsewhere (I had to manually check, since the authors of the article did not provide a link; and now I see why).  I would be inclined to move to '''Delete''' as |non-notable, because if even the IMDB is apparently ignoring it (or is ignorant of it), then it cannot be all that notable.  I am also concerned about the lack of quality o_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary.2C_and_tertiary_sources|significant secondary sources that acknowledge the film and expound on its importance (or the importance of the actors or production / crew).  The "reliable sources" listed seem to be information provided by the producers, which seems a bit dubious.  What if the whole thing is a fraud?  Can we prove it is not, or at least provide evidence to indicate it is not just a "maybe" project?  Or, if the thing falls through financially and they pull the rug on the thing, and it never gets produced or aired, do we keep the article?  If the answer is "well, no" then it probably fails |notability (whatever that means today, given the dispute
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: article seems to be more promotional than anything else, also agree with the  as well. I'm also concerned a newly created editor's very first edit is to an AfD, that always raises a red flag with me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: in originally sumitted form, delete as promotional. Reeks of  too. But see updated comment
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)