Deletion of Cecil Newton, Sr. (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails . Clear case of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Cam Newton#Eligibility controversy.  A first read through the article and I thought it was about the son.  Words like "allegations" and "apparently " along with "via text message by a representative"  and "he was said to have attended".  There looks like a lot of speculation here, where no one is sure what happened and things should be better on a . Also fails 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NGRIDIRON)

Comment: In the last 24 hours, I have re-read both articles, and Google-searched Cecil.  I've come to a couple of conclusions.  First, Cecil's own college football, pro football, and ministerial careers are not notable under any of the specific NSPORTS notability guidelines, nor under WP:GNG.  Second, his Wikipedia notability (or perhaps "notoriety" is a better word in his case) is almost entirely derived from his involvement in Cam's NCAA recruiting and eligibility controversy that arose after Cam's transfer to Auburn.  But for that scandal/controversy, Cecil would not be a close call for notability under WP:GNG.  In deed, there was no stand-alone Wikipedia article for Cecil until the scandal arose.  Applying that "but for" text, I say redirect to the Cam Newton article's controversy section per  and , and merge what appropriate salvageable content there may be to the "yearly years," "controversy," and "personal" sections of the Cam Newton article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: There was a consensus at Talk:Cecil Newton, Sr. after the last AfD that there was enough material to create Cam Newton eligibility controversy or Cam Newton recruiting investigation.  This would avoid  mention of details in Cam Newton's article for something he was never implicated.  A |summary in Cam's article would be more ideal, and additional sources on the scandal, identified already at Talk:Cecil Newton, Sr.. could be used to expand the contents. My recommendation then and now is to just rename Cecil Sr's article.  Cecil Sr. is not notable, but the scandal is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:SS)