Deletion of AFC Champions League clubs performance comparison

Comment: The deletion request seems to be based purely on , with several Wikipedia policies linked often without a coherent narrative as to why it should be deleted. This leaves the onus on those wishing to keep the article without having a clear objection to discuss. This article, and similar articles should remain. Wikipedia policy cited included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Article fails  for having no citations. Issues with ,  with mini browsers and Accessibility browsers. It's weird to say that this is MOS:COLOR and ACCESS enabled when it clearly is not.  is a major concern with these type of articles. I find all the keep votes strangely floored and majority are not providing any explanation why this should truly be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:ACCESS||WP:NOSTATS)

Comment: as a  from the main article, and possibly rename to something else. This article serves a similar function to articles about the electoral history of a politician, in that it provides a place for tables that are too large too fit on the main page without  problems, but which still hold encyclopedic content. Also, nomination was almost certainly disruptive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Are people forgetting that  is meant to be a thing as their is no sources for this comparison which is a red flag. Another one seems to be the fact that these Keep votes aren't trying to explain why they should be kept and just say they want it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This nomination appears to be made in bad-faith as a  nomination in retaliation for the (somewhat questionable) result - the threat to disrupt Wikipedia is made by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)