Deletion of Denizen (2010 film)

Comment: In the past few weeks, I have observed several articles relating to the work of Lesbian filmmakers and Lesbian actress summarily deleted off of Wikipedia.  These articles were ''notable'' to our community, and they are important to us.  There appears to be an unfortunate trend of Deletionism and bias on Wikipedia.  There are several reliable sources provided in the article that are standard mediums of communication and news in the movie industry and the LGBT community.  The claim that they are not |reliable sources appears to demonstrate a lack of this understanding for our community.  I have made my case, I have welcomed collaboration, I have appealed for understanding. If an Administrator is able to place the article into my workshop, I would appreciate the assistance. Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE)

Comment: I have just done some major clean-up on the article, addresing many of the nominator's concerns.  It would be prudent to allow expansion and further sourcing as film gets its 2010 theatrical release in a few weeks. Note: the film (not just the "making of short) has already screened at festivals such as Sundance. And yes, genre-specific reviews are often dismissed out-of-hand... but they are indicative of the growing attention the film is receiving. Further, the article now includes several in-depth reliable sources toward meeting  through , and it is reasonable to presume that more will come with general release, not less
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Again you are referencing not|-rs. The article will be deleted if you don't provide a '''RELIABLE SOURCE'''. Also, 2nd reference says CNN but it is iReport
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Firstly I'm assuming good faith, but good faith can't overrule policy.  More I can't find any |reliable sources.  They may become available upon release however.  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1194424/ leads me to believe this may become true.  I myself am not that well acquanted with policy on this matter, but looking into it it doesn't matter if it ''may'' become notable.  It must be notable now.  Therefore
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE)