Deletion of ScoopWhoop

Comment: The article reads like an advertisement, prompting me to tag it as such.  But that is strictly a content issue.  At AfD, all we consider is notability.  Under , notability is demonstrated by multiple reliable independent secondary sources discussing the subject in detail.  Those sources clearly exist, as demonstrated by the http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/scoopwhoop-a-traffic-driver-ndtv-still-gets-more-hits-on-the-web-114122600121_1.html Business Standard and http://qz.com/258337/five-reasons-why-scoopwhoop-buzzfeeds-clone-in-india-has-been-so-successful/ Quartz articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is calming to be a news and media company but does not meets the Wikipedia's criteria for |notability for |organizations and companies nor it have significant coverage in reliable sources, except those press-releases and reviews which is again not treated as the reliable source. &nbsp;D&nbsp;Mi
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ORG)