Deletion of Tony Concepcion

Comment: Holds a ceremonial position that doesn’t pass . Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation if somebody can do significantly better than this. The notability test for mayors attaches to ''directly-elected executive'' mayors, not the ceremonial kind who just automatically rotate in and out of the position on an annual basis — and while Liverpool is a large and prominent enough city that its city councillors might be deemed to pass  #2 if the article were genuinely substantive and well-referenced, those words do not describe this article. The notability test for local politicians is the ability to write and source a ''good'' article, not just the ability to drop a giant cluster |reference bomb of 25 mostly |primary sources on a single sentence stating that he exists. I also suspect some form of direct |conflict of interest editing here, given that the creator's edit history (including deleted edits) focuses ''very'' disproportionately on people with the specific surname Concepcion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COI)

Comment: Passes . Subject has substantial recognition in numerous reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)