Deletion of Kanhaiya Kumar

Comment: with 2016 JNU sedition controversy. Case of . All coverage only related to the JNU incident
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: The subject actually clearly passes  quite comfortably. For starters, just read some of the news articles present in the article; |significant coverage in major news and media sources, including BBC, ''The Economic Times'', ''The Indian Express'', ''Hindustan Times'', ''The Hindu'' and many others. The nomination asserts non-notability, but provides no guideline or policy based rationale to back up the assertion. See also: 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SIGCOV||WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE)

Comment: this article as it definitely meets the level of independent significant reliable coverage required by . The article has over 50 sources and the vast majority of them are reliable. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35576855http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jnusu-president-kanhaiya-kumar-gets-clean-chit-in-aap-government-appointed-probe/articleshow/51240113.cmshttp://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/kanhaiya-kumar-bail-jnu-delhi-high-court/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160305/jsp/nation/story_72972.jsp#.VzpL47h97IV
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)