Deletion of Arcane Legends

Comment: though I think  applied here and should have been  deleted, as the article was completely promotional at that point https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arcane_Legends&oldid=954706166. I found few sources where it was covered beyond trivial or routine mentions in /RS and some sources with Wiki articles, like Pocket Gamer https://www.pocketgamer.com/articles/046674/arcane-legends/, Engadget https://www.engadget.com/2012-11-14-free-for-all-arcane-legends-is-more-than-pocket-legends-2-0.html, Slide to Play http://web.archive.org/web/20130111224023/http://www.slidetoplay.com/story/arcane-legends-review, Gamezebo https://www.gamezebo.com/2012/11/20/arcane-legends-review/ , Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/danieltack/2012/11/15/arcane-legends-a-hack-and-slash-home-run/#37f0e9d10e9b (while written by a contributor, the reviewer is now an editor at Game Informer, which adds to reliability), a paragraph in Svet Kompjutera https://www.sk.rs/arhiva/clanak/21662/arcane-legends, Tech in Asia https://id.techinasia.com/review-arcane-legends-super-fun-and-solid-mmorpg. There would need to be some discussion about Modojo, but since its owned by the same network as Shacknews that is deemed reliable at /RS, I'd consider it reliable as well https://modojo.com/article/6044/arcane_legends. It passes  overall. I wouldn't oppose a  deletion, since there is nothing here to salvage right now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:G11||WP:VG||WP:VG||WP:GNG||WP:TNT)