Deletion of Mai Gotō (actress)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation if somebody with better Japanese-language skills than I have can do better than this. While it's true that the Japanese article is longer, it isn't what I could call better-referenced: two of its three footnotes are unrecoverable dead links, one of those two was a |primary source which was never actually support for notability ''at all'', and the one reference that is still live is just a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article about somebody else, not coverage that's substantively ''about her''. And per , the fact that an article happens to exist on another language Wikipedia is not in and of itself an inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to have reliable sources; on the basis of the sources present in it, I'd ''personally'' nominate the Japanese article for ''deletion'' if I had any ability to navigate the deletion process in a language I can read only through Google Translate. If somebody with better Japanese reading skills can actually find evidence of better sources, I'd be happy to reconsider this — but the sources here aren't cutting the mustard, and the sources in the Japanese article aren't any better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:WAX)

Comment: does not meet  / . Ja.wiki article is equally unconvincing for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ENT)

Comment: I'm surprise {{re|Bearcat}} did not bring up that she does not meet  because she was only a losing candidate for Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)