Deletion of List of vineyards and wineries (2nd nomination)

Comment: What part of  are you referring to? I can't see how this article fits any of the seven points listed there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: This article clearly passes  (esp. clear inclusion criteria and usefulness) and does not break policy according to , as it is not a business directory as such and is not a loose association of articles. That it may not be finished, and that it may be biased is a risk for every wikipedia article, and certainly not grounds for deletion. This argument has been had before - see the first AfD discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STAND||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: as this is creeping into the grounds of . I'm not convinced by the argument that it isn't a business listing as the vast majority of wineries are business ventures (for-profit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: as per the nomination under , in particular I draw everyone attention to item 7. '''''A complete exposition of all possible details''''' this article is specificallly defined as that. So what possible filter could we reasonably apply that would make this at least maintainable, notability? with a WP article we dont self reference, filter notability with a RS - every wine guide, wine book lists every winery in the region its writting about. Awards,medals, etc for their wines? Basically everyone of the Australian wineries listed meet basic notability, what this list compares to is a List of train stations with a criteria ''The following is a non-exhaustive list of train and subway stations from around the world''...... smaller scope lists to support regions would be a more reasonable format
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)