Deletion of Belldandy

Comment: as bad faith nomination. The nominator is clearly throwing a tantrum over the proposed merger of these articles and |has put them up for deletion, thus disrupting Wikipedia, to illustrate a point. However, there should be no prejudice on merger of these articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: at most we merge, but deletion is pretty much out of the question, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per otability, all articles are presumed to be notable by default, unless proven otherwise.  And I AM holding quite a few sources at hand to prove anyone thinking of proving it otherwise wrong, so, what is your point in saying these articles are not notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)