Deletion of List of songs about weather

Comment: vague standard for inclusion. Many of the songs included on the lists are not "about" the topic but instead merely ''mention'' the topic in the lyrics or have a particular word in the lyrics or title and what with #DIR|Wikipedia not being a directory of loosely-associated topics this doesn't wash. There are many precedents for similar lists being deleted recently and these don't appear to be any better. To address some of the specific ''keep'' comments: it's true that some of these lists have been considered for deletion previously and remained as either ''keep'' or ''no consensus''. However, |consensus can change and, especially in a ''no consensus'' closure from 10 months ago, it's not unreasonable considering the recent deletions of a number of similar lists to revisit these. While mass nominations can be problematic in determining consensus, they are not forbidden by policy and IMHO seeking to procedurally keep these lists on the basis of the form of the nomination is not a compelling argument. The nomination and the comments in support of it riase compelling arguments for deletion and seeking a closure on procedural grounds does not rebut those points
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:CCC)

Comment: Let's do it all in a row and video tape it. A whole lot of |not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per the arguments given in all the previous discussions, in particular . If somebody wants to transwiki, maybe to the http://music.wikia.com/ Music Wikia? (Just a thought
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LC)

Comment: There are too many unrelated topics here for anyone to defend within the span of an AfD.  Lets suppose I were to choose the first, List of songs about weather.  First, I need to demonstrate that this is encylopedia worthy.  I need to show that these lists have been compiled in |reliable sources and that others must find them useful.  I might start with these (after a bit of googling
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I fail to see why they violate . Also, some may be substandard quality, but others are not. Some of these lists have already survived AFD in the past. As said above, some of them are useful and they closely associated with the topic on hand
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I do not see where  is violated in any of the lists. The songs in the list are not at all loosely associated, as it was argued, they are closely associated with the topic of the list. In my opinion the content can be useful for some readers. There might be mistakes in the lists that require cleanup but that does not affect the value of the list itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: the precedents have been uniform or at least lately they have been; let's finish the job so that we move on. There are no real keepers in here; I made an argument about keeping the suicide songs because their effects on society (litigation usually) and that can be a stand alone article as could fears of nuclear war during the 1980's and how that was reflected in music (assuming some es have already hit upon the connection) ditto car crash songs; school; and all the rest of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)