Deletion of Kathleen Snavely (2nd nomination)

Comment: but I would not object to a redirect.  Subject satisfies the literal requirements of the general notability guidelines with significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources per .  That said, there is absolutely no reason why most of these persons cannot be noted as a one- or two-sentence entry in a "List of oldest persons in X" article, or "List of Xish supercentenarians" article, even if they are marginally notable.  That would probably be best addressed in the form of a Wikipedia-wide RfC for the sake of efficiency and consistency
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of Irish supercentenarians per . The subject clearly meets GNG, but is equally clearly never going to have more than 5 lines about her. There is nothing here that cannot be covered as part of a larger list/article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: to List of Irish supercentenarians, per . While there are lots of sources, they are all about her becoming the oldest Irish person so she is only notable for that one event. Vanamonde93 sums this article up perfectly. Take out the longevity trivia about who she surpassed and you're left with nothing more than what's on the table at the Irish article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to an appropriate list.  More than half of the text of the article is irrelevant to the subject.  It's the customary, obsessive listing of who preceded the subject in the mythical contest to die slower than others, and who the subject dislodged as the new "champion" in one subcategory or another of the human longevity Olympics. The rest is wholly mundane details about who she was born to and when, who her siblings were and where/when she died. , , , . This one is the archetype for all of these stubalicious hobbyist/fancruft "articles" - chock full of statistics in a fictional competition and devoid of any facts that belong in an enctclopedia.  : Wikipedia is not a memorial site, nor a web-hosting service for the Gerontology Research Group human longevity hobbyists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOPAGE||WP:NOT)

Comment: on the simple basis that living a long time is insufficient grounds for . It is merely tabloid news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)