Deletion of Ron Miller (Maryland politician)

Comment: WP:MILL|very many people are "prolific writers" in politics. This is so poorly written as to be on the |cusp of being deleted for editing alone. |We have routinely deleted bios of also-ran politicians. The "keep" votes in the first AfD focused on coverage in the ''Washington Post''. Pinging {{U|DGG}}, {{U|Frankie}} (inactive since 2016), and {{U|American Eagle}}, who all were "keep"s in the last AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win, but this is not demonstrating that he has preexisting notability for other reasons that would have gotten him an article independently of the candidacy. It is far, far too dependent on |primary sourcing that is not support for notability at all, such as his own campaign literature and his own writing and staff profiles and/or press releases from his own employers, and even the minority of the footnotes that actually represent |reliable source coverage still features glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other people — so while there are a ''couple'' of sources left that are both reliable and substantively ''about him'', there aren't ''enough'' of those to make a person notable just for being an unsuccessful candidate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: Fails . However, he may meet  as the interim dean of the Helms School of Government at Liberty University
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NPROF)

Comment: Deans, interim deans, associate deans, etc. are generally not sufficiently high-rank positions to qualify for #C6
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)