Deletion of Juliet Schmidt

Comment: for failing . She was accused of bad judgment bordering on the unethical, which doesn't even rise to . None of the other references spotlight this deputy DA, but rather the cases she was working on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: as not passing . The lady simply is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: subject does not appear to be notable as there is not sufficient ''significant coverage'' in multiple reliable sources of the subject herself, and thus fails  and . There is an event which received some coverage in a reliable source, but the event is not notable itself, and thus, even if the subject were found to be notable within the context of the non-notable event the biography article would be merged into the non-existent article of the non-notable event per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)