Deletion of IndeJuice

Comment: Just a recap for editors:Reference 1 (domains.google.com) - Company listing, '''not independent'''Reference 2 (find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk) - Company listing, '''not independent'''Reference 3 (trademarks.ipo.gov.uk) - Trademark listing, '''not independent'''Reference 4 (databox.com) - Brief mention in a promo content site, likely not independent and '''not significant coverage'''Reference 5 (download.cnet.com) - Not a CNET news article, but an application listing that contains a paragraph from IndeJuice themselves, '''not independent'''Reference 6 (ventsmagazine.com) - 2 short paragraphs in a news article about five different companies, independent but '''not significant coverage'''Reference 7 (register.fca.org.uk) - Company listing, '''not independent'''Reference 8 (assets.publishing.service.gov.uk) - Company listing, '''not independent'''Reference 9 (gov.uk) - Company listing, '''not independent'''Reference 10 (gov.uk) - Company listing, '''not independent'''Additionally, no reliable independent sources providing significant coverage are found in several BEFORE searches. In conclusion, this is a definite failure of ,  and CORP
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Saying the article passes GNG is not enough as per the RfC at  which refers explicitly to the ''strict significant coverage requirements spelled out in the SNG for organisations and companies.'' The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is CORP and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short, CORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails CORP. The Keep !voters above need to point to references that meet NCORP. q
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)