Deletion of Anti-Muslim pogroms in India

Comment: to Anti-Muslim violence in India. Ignoring whatever kind of intent may have been behind the article's creation, there are enough reliable sources to establish the subject itself as notable. The alleged POV (I say alleged because I haven't delved into the issue yet) of how the article is phrased is a basis for rewriting parts, but  breaches on a notable topic aren't grounds for deletion. As for inclusion in the main article on religious violence or whatever in India, then it's quite long and detailed, but this article already has a healthy amount of sources and information and as such can stand on its own
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per discussions above. This article has all the necessary ingredients of a |coatrack or a scorn-worthy |pov fork. I don't wish to get involved in the discussions, so spare me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRAK||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: After the Talk:2002_Gujarat_violence#Request_move|failed attempt to move 2002 Gujarat violence to "{{no redirect|Anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat 2002}}", User:Darkness Shines went on to create the article Anti-Muslim pogroms in India as well as the category with the same name. The article was deleted and he created it again, some of us believe the sources are cherry-picked as a user ({{U|Pectore}}) Talk:2002_Gujarat_violence#Request_move|mentioned here. There are more issues, we Talk:Godhra_train_burning#Name_of_the_article|couldn't move a page from {{no redirect|Godhra train burning}} to {{no redirect|Godhra train violence}} even though the name is imprecise and vague, precisely because the majority of the  NAME|sources didn't call it by that name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMON)