Deletion of Housing theory

Comment: without prejudice, #A3|no content and #G1|patent nonsense.  This article consists of a list of case studies prefaced by this remarkable text:''This article is related to:architecture urban planning dwelling home hearth dormitory homeostasis community shelter building post-industrial age nomadic culture co-operative condo family philosophy design aesthetics CIAM Athens....''It goes on, too.  The subject may be worthy of an article.  This list might be worth moving to a userpage, as a list of topics to cover.  But this is simply not an article yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:CSD)

Comment: A http://www.google.com/search?q=%22housing+theory%22 Google search reveals that some universities do offer courses and lectures on housing theory (although most hits relate to a journal).  The article is horribly written, but that is not a reason for deletion ().  The page's creator is also correct to cite 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UGLY||WP:DEMOLISH)