Deletion of Niko Omilana

Comment: minor Internet personality, but scrapes in in terms of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Much like the recent case of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Fosh|Max Fosh: a bunch of routine election candidate coverage which  tells us isn't helpful determining notability as a politician. I don't think there's evidence he meets 's recommendation to meet both  and the , or either in isolation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NYOUTUBE||WP:ENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Article is based far too heavily on |primary sources that are not support for notability, such as his own |self-published Twitter, Instagram and YouTube profiles and/or directory entries — but the just six sources that are actually independent of him at all are not building a strong case that he would get over : three of those six are still not reliable source media outlets at all, two just include his name in listicles and thus aren't ''substantive'' coverage of him, and the one that is actually both reliable and about him in any non-trivial way is still just the |routine campaign coverage that ''every'' mayoral candidate in ''every'' city ''always'' gets. Nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:SELFPUB||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)