Deletion of Carolyn Mackenzie (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm not sure she meets , however, she passes  as a recipient of an Edward R. Murrow Award (Radio Television Digital News Association)|Edward R. Murrow Award, a "significant award".   is enhanced by http://www.insidetoronto.com/news-story/5445141-family-matters-global-news-anchor-carolyn-mackenzie-on-juggling-career-home-and-planting-roots-for/ this lengthy article in ''Inside Toronto'', a reliable source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly passes  as a recipient of an Edward R. Murrow Award (Radio Television Digital News Association)|Edward R. Murrow Award, a "significant award".  Excluding sources published by her employer, four other reliable sources have been cited in the article, and each has written detailed articles about this person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Does pass  criteria #4c: "has won significant critical attention" for winning the Edward R. Murrow award and sources cited above by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: This article was nominated for deletion in February 2015, and then relisted twice.  The result was "no consensus".  The same editor who first nominated it for deletion did so again in July 2015.  It was then relisted.  That make 5 listings in 6 months.   states: "relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended, and while having a deletion notice on a page is not harmful, its presence over several weeks can become disheartening for its editors. Therefore, in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice."  This seems to be pushing the spirit of the policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:RELIST)