Deletion of Columbia Mill

Comment: satisfies , since the article's ''References'' indicate "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I acknowledge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Only the first source is possibly okay per . I can't find anything else in a web search. The Further Reading may be the key to determining whether  is (weakly) met. I also wouldn't be adverse to re-draftifying, since most of these will be offline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)