Deletion of Occult science

Comment: The use of the term is intended to suggest that the occult is scientific, which makes it inherently . Also, there is no reliably referenced content here; and any relevant content that comes up would be better placed in other articles, such as Western esotericism. -- Special:Contributions/120.17.62.166|120.17.62.166
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: Concur with the above that it suggests that the occult is scientifically valid, which is both  and very problematic without any attempt at a citation to back it up. Attempted to find a source that might offer an opportunity for expansion but couldn't find anything remotely reputable with ease
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: FYI.  I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AOccult_science&type=revision&diff=768969464&oldid=717842824 assembled much of the potential  and writers on the topic mentioned here in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Occult_science#Adding_RS this section of the article's talk page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)