Deletion of Zwick Roell Group (2nd nomination)

Comment: There is no need for anything new of any substance to have materialized since the last AFD discussion, because enough of substance alreadyt materialised there. If the nominator objects to the sources not being in the article then  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: Per Whpq's 2 example sources in the last AfD (http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/Quality-Safety/Tester-uses-extrusion-method-to-measure-viscosity and http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-9180345_ITM), it appears that it does meet . Just because it isn't sourced doesn't mean it can't be reliably sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)