Deletion of Kalyan Silks

Comment: The subject meets |Wikipedia notability guideline for companies and organizations. It has significant coverage in the multiple |reliable sources as such, http://www.hindu.com/2007/10/24/stories/2007102454661900.htm, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/28/stories/2011022859562000.htm, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/article3600707.ece, http://theceweb.thehindu.co.in/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/article471405.ece, http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/06/stories/2006040605482002.htm, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/article3681030.ece, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/article3707822.ece, http://entertainment.oneindia.in/malayalam/news/2013/pictures-prithviraj-dhanush-inaugurate-new-kalyan-silks-showroom-125469.html, http://www.dnaindia.com/lifestyle/report-kalyan-silks-the-global-kerala-brand-1744587 and http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bangalore/article604729.ece. I'm all set to assume that the nominator did not perform , before nominating this article for deletion. If the present articles includes some promotional contents or wp:peacock terms, it is subjected to discussion on the article's talk page. eletion is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:RS||WP:BEFORE||WP:D)

Comment: Hmm. I wikt:concede|concede completely, '''withdrawing my deletion request''' in full. Appears to be my mistake. I see it has been covered by more than 3 independent national newspapers, which should be more than needed for the |General notability guidelines for articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)