Deletion of Jeff Halevy

Comment: Bollocks. It is Halevy's expert opinion that is featured in the refs. Further he the ref for Exercise for Men, he authored. He is also obviously the center-point for the other pieces as well. I'm coming in on this in the middle -- and wonder why all the contention over this simple entry! -- but this meets  and we all need to ease up on each other here a bit. Cheers. Special:Contributions/64.134.67.62|64.134.67.62
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I looked in a few of the refs and in each of the links given above on this page, and the subject does not meet . Yes, Halevy is a fitness trainer, and yes, he is mentioned in several space-filling light-weight stories. However, there are countless thousands of people who do the same. Note that these stories were written ''not'' to highlight Halevy and his achievements, but to enthuse about fitness as a topic of interest to readers.  has many points which can be summed up as "has received significant coverage in reliable |secondary sources that are independent of the subject". No such sources have been found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: Too much testosterone here! ;) All that's needed here is rewrite as the article does meet  guidelines. I'll take a stab at it and clean up the refs as well. Special:Contributions/68.171.231.16|68.171.231.16
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails  - Halevy is irrelevant not notable.  Notability is demonstrated by ''having been noted'', i.e. documented, in depth, in multiple independent published works from people with good reputations for fact checking and accuracy.  None of the articles referenced are about Halevy, they're about fitness.  There's a claim that the Woman's World mention (which again is an oversell) is just another attempt to claim relevance.  Per Wikipedia, Woman's World is "published in a large tabloid newspaper format...approximately 12% of the magazine devoted to advertisements" and is "generally marketed with other tabloid papers" - its clear the entry is just being used for PR - the fact that at least 5 new people happened upon this article during the 7 days its been on AFD are huge red flags
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: What's all this fuss about? I was about to add new info when I saw the AfD tag... This entry has been up for quite some time...Why are we obsessing all of the sudden? Per above the refs definitely adhere to ...even more so on ones that weren't included, eg the Vital Juice piece and the Energy Kichen piece. Self Magazine, Nascar etc I believe speak for themselves. What's gives?  Special:Contributions/69.65.109.66|69.65.109.66
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)