Deletion of List of panels making life or death decisions

Comment: Concur this artile is a  and NPoV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per Bearian among others. For the life of me, I can't figure out how this can be shaped into a suitable article. Overbroad, shoehorning disparate elements into a category,  and . Just fails on several fronts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:OR)

Comment: no redirect should be necessary (I can't imagine anyone typing that into the search box). It relies to heavily on the FP article, and might have copyright issues. That's apart from the obvious  issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: This is a classic example of .  I see no need for a redirect, as this title is too long and complex to ever be a valid search term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: The title is overly general. If the content warrants an article, it would appropriately be call "Death panel". However, the content is not cohesive and borders on |synth. While "death panel" currently directs to Political positions of Sarah Palin#Health care, I'm not sure "List of panels making life or death decisions" is a likely search term for the content found there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: huge  problem essay and masses of , as well as being a troll magnet. Shouldn't be a redirect as it is a highly unlikely term.  and  issues. Article has no encyclopaedic value
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:OR||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:TRUTH)

Comment: I was notified about this, but it isn't "my" article. If you look at the history, Special:Contributions/209.6.238.201|209.6.238.201 added the content. I made a paltry redirect to Death panel, after the IP accidentally made the redirect request at , and not /R.  My !vote is for it to '''redirect''' to Political positions of Sarah Palin#Health care, per Death panel
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC||WP:AFC)

Comment: per |the above discussion, as violating almost all of |our core values.  I can't ever recall advocating deletion of anything per , but there is always a first time, and folks, this is it.  This article |synthesizes a whole bunch of ''somewhat'' related topics and shoves them kicking and screaming into one |random list.  I can not figure out how to even start to rescue this one.  Please, someone, put this out of its misery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:5P||WP:NPOV||WP:SYNTH||WP:LIST)

Comment: with '''No redirect''' This seems like |original research, a thinly-veiled POV political statement, and a potential magnet for nasty controversy.  I do not see any compelling reason that the collection of "panels" captured by this list is a topic notable in and of itself...I would need multiple reliable sources to justify this before I would recommend a keep.  I see no compelling reason to redirect to Palin--it's a long search term that no one is going to type in anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: this is a mere  for POV-pushing, and incapable of being made 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Well-written article, but |Wikipedia is not a soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)