Deletion of Flat Bastion Road (2nd nomination)

Comment: per , "''The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion''" and so there is no case to answer.  Wikipedia still has the function of a gazeteer per  and so a historic placename like this should remain a blue link.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:5)

Comment: I saw it was a Gibraltar article and immediately thought delete. I didn't find any sources, but one look at the article and there's no room to argue that the topic does not meet , particularly given the sourcing of the article and the age and size of the road (which means it is going to be written about alot overtime.) The article is well written, at least a "B" (and not the "C" it currently has
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or '''merge''' (though I can't see anything worth merging that's not in the target article already): No evidence of notability for this road in reliable sources. My own Google searches turned up nothing even faintly promising in terms of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. It's basically an unremakable and un of the mill street, with coverage limited to news reports of road maintainance and the like that are of local interest only. This is by no means one of the major streets of the colony. Claims for historic significance are specious, as this applies to the bastion itself, and not to the road, which is of little, if any, historic significance. Notability is not inherited applies here. Not sure if there's even anything worth merging
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: per , , , (insert other similarly subjective guideline here)"  I'm actually not against it in any form and would much prefer it to be kept and be potentially improved, but watching all the nonsense nominations it already went through during last week I realized the fact that no matter what the article will not see the rest until a certain person will achieve his/her personal agenda. So let's just end all the petty arguing and finish this whole farce once and for all, shall we
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:OMGWTFBBQ)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Streets in Gibraltar. Verifiable and referenced geographical information. Deletion would be a disservice to our readers. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: for being an unremarkable street without significant coverage beyond normal repair works and very minor local news. While a merge is better than having a standalone article on this, it doesn't make much sense to create articles listing non notable streets. Looking at the list of "planned articles" at Wikipedia:WikiProject Gibraltar/to do doesn't give the impression of being restrictive at all. There is nothing that sets this road apart from millions of other roads in every town and city in the world. It hasn't played any significant historical role, isn't a touristic or shopping highlight, isn't a major thoroughfare, isn't renowned for its scenery, ... Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)