Deletion of Shocker Toys (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets several criteria listed in , including what I think is a vexatious nomination which has transformed into a hotbed of disruption and dispute, and that no one unrelated to the topic has !voted to ''delete''. Multiple |verifiable secondary sources are there, and the |general notability guideline is hence clearly satisfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: I've been working on the article for a bit, and since 2007 the company has been discussed in the Washington Post Times and had additional coverage in Playthings. Sources include the two mentioned, Animation Magazine and The Record (a long, although old, article about the company), while another three print refs have been identified but not yet tracked down. Generally, they're a small toy company, who seem to have a reputation for not always delivering on their products, but I'd argue that they have enough coverage to meet ote, especially with the dispute they seem to have had with Marvel Toys
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)