Deletion of List of county routes in Hampshire County, West Virginia

Comment: per . Neither the individual roads nor the countywide collection of roads appear to have independent and reliable sources with significant coverage as needed to satisfy general notability. Some editors love to create complete lists of named or numbered things, but that is not consistent with .  The ability to verify their existence is insufficient to justify their appearance in the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of every verifiable thing, or we would have similar articles about "The firetrucks of Smithville"  or "The mailboxes of Jonesville," when there is an official listing of firetrucks by model, number, age and firestation, or mailboxes by street address. There are many nonnotable but verifiable sets of things operated by governments which do not belong in encyclopedias
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:NOTDIR and county roads fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . County route systems that are not numbered uniquely as part of a state scheme are not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per : Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. As happens to be the case here. Best regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:UNSOURCED)

Comment: Consensus with the above examples is that county roads can be notable enough for a list but are not generally notable enough for individual articles unless they satisfy . There have been multiple discussions on this subject in the past. Nominator's arguments apply to the notability of individual roads, and are a good explanation of why they are not individually notable, but that is not the issue here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not one reference. How is this information even verifiable? Not |notable so fails the basic criteria for existence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: these are  roars, no indication that the topic as such is discussed in sources and meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:NLIST)

Comment: as per .  I think when we choose to have lists of individual items, sometimes each is individually notable and in some cases each is not, but this is reaching too far down the notability ladder for inclusion.  I don't think anyone would argue if this was numbered state roads, but this is only 1/2 step up from list of every paved road in a county, and I think this is simply too much minutia for an encyclopedia, and is of dubious value to the reader
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)