Deletion of 69,105

Comment: Lacks |significant coverage in multiple |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) Would be trivia if merged to the Infocom article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42)

Comment: as . It's possible a good amount of this article is wrong as it can't be |verified. I'm wary of redirecting it if one editor is just going to override consensus, but I defer to the consensus if a redirect is still appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: as .  This is worth maybe a sentence in an article about Infocom at its best.  A redirect would be completely dubious
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: we are |not a web host for insider jokes, nor do we |publish original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:OR)