Deletion of Bianca Jade (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom.  Also, the |sourcing is as poor as I've ever seen in an article with these many references.  I must have commented on 100s of discussions at AfD over the years, and this is one of the worst. For example, http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/22/us/aesha-update-surgery-begins/index.html?hpt=hp_c2 Note 15 does not even have anything to do with the subject and does not even mention her in passing!  Most of the other references are social networking sites, or Faux News, and the like. I can't see |any evidence that she's notable. Just to be sure, I looked at http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Bianca+Jade%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 Google News and found nothing at all, except false Ghits about Bianca Jagger and Jade Jagger
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . The article has lots of references, but sadly none of them can be considered independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject. Google doesn't turn up any reliable sources either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not going to be as harsh as Bearian, but this is indeed a stellar example of Wikipedia:Masking the lack of notability|notability masking and |wikipuffery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFF)