Deletion of List of former employees of McKinsey & Company

Comment: Fails  - former employees of McKinsey have not been discussed as a group, they're discussed as individuals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: This is closer to a "list of notable alumni" for a university than it is a company directory. Restricting to blue-linked individuals is enough to keep the page from becoming an indiscriminate heap.  inapplicable; passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:LISTN)

Comment: I have no opinion about related categories yet. Categories serve a different purpose, follow different rules and should be discussed in a different venue (at fD) - AfD is the wrong forum for such suggestions. Let's keep the discussion focussed on this specific list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: per Cunard's findings that this would meet . As long as the criteria is limited to notable former employees and clearly laid out (either on the page or in the title), there is no issues with indiscriminateness
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: We're |not a company directory of everyone who has ever worked for a company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Admittedly the suitability of such lists is a matter of opinion - editors can disagree in good faith about what is "encyclopedic" or not with some leeway in-between. But I agree with other editors that this list is not of encyclopedic value (per  and ). People, even high-ranking businesspeople, change their employers all the time. The alleged correlation between "being a former McKinsey consultant" and "getting a nice position later" is unclear and exaggerated (and already briefly mentioned in the main article anyway). I'll also note, that one of the main sources for the list topic's alleged significance is not a "study", but a reader editor's pseudo-scientific news article in ''USA Today'' based on primary data with a simplified one-dimensional interpretation of the results. Such popular articles are fun to read, but don't automatically establish a relevant encyclopedic topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:NOT)

Comment: per . If we go ahead to delete this list article, the same should also apply to the category: :Category:McKinsey & Company people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)