Deletion of MON 863

Comment: This article has substantial content, as does MON 810.  This morning I played with merging content from these articles into the Genetically modified maize‎ article as examples of GM maize.  GM Maize would be by far the most appropriate merge target -- logically, these articles are forks of that article.  While I would not oppose such a merge, bringing all the content from those two articles in, would a) cause that article to really balloon; and b) would make it harder for people really interested in understanding the specific story about each of these products to have a clear picture of the details.  But in any case, MON 836 and MON 810 are each decent, NPOV, well-sourced articles and should not be deleted. They definitely meet  standards, as indicated by the wealth of RS in each of them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I think this variety passes the . Although not all varieties do; I'm wary of applying an all-or-nothing approach to merging or deleting articles on GMOs because coverage varies. Anyway. In what way is the article spam
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: MON 863 and MON 810, which both pass . For starters, see sources in these articles for evidence of notability. Then, select links from the Find sources template at the header of this discussion for more reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)