Deletion of Dexter Edge

Comment: Seven articles archived in JSTOR is far above the norm for a musicological researcher; his articles are heavily cited there and he's extremely well regarded in Bach/Mozart circles, being invited to nearly every major conference I can think of there.  On the weak side for musicological notability, he doesn't have a permanent academic post (though being a senior appointee at PHI is almost significant enough itself).  Musicology is not a discipline where you can expect to find FUTON bias|free evidence and articles on the web. Reading through the journals in the field makes it clear that Edge's output and notability is clearly above the average for the field.  I went through the list of Cat. American Musicologists a few months ago for a discussion on  and identified 8 that I think should be brought to AfD (I'll send the list offline, if anyone'd like) and several borderline cases, but Edge was not an "edge case" by any means
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per DGG, and because of http://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-no2005-29053 Worldcat holdings, he passes |the Prof test
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)