Deletion of Jean Mill

Comment: She meets  with many articles about her and her work. As mentioned, she also gets by on  #2 with adding a new breed. The article also needs some improvement, like restructuring
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: to Bengal cat#History. The ''Los Angeles Times'' and ''New York Times'' articles already support a short summary of Mill's contributions to Bengal cat breeding in the main article on Bengal cats. That article also provides needed context, as  suggests, for explaining the specifics of breeding one generation or type rather than another, so the section can avoid excessive detail and avoid the temptation of padding out a paragraph in order to look more like an article. Redirecting to a well-sourced, tightly-written section in that article provides a much better service to our readers, who are here to read encyclopedia entries
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: Meets .  Well sourced as it is.  No compliance with efore.  Indeed, U.S. v Sugden is plenty notable by itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:B)

Comment: per  SMcCandlish. I'm in a similar boat as Abecedare in that a lot of the sources are really more about the breeds, and you really need ''significant'' secondary coverage of the BLP instead for notability, not just sources focusing on a product someone makes. A lot of the above for keeping the article is just  or  that mostly needs to be dismissed. The sources I'm seeing so far are really just passing mention of Jean Mill and focused more on the breed.  definitely applies here and doesn't justify a separate page. Some of the personal life stuff related to U.S. v Sugden seems like it's drifting into  territory too. There's next to no secondary coverage of that, and at best, the case would get its own page, not a BLP
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:INHERITED||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: this is not how our inclusion guidelines work.  We have entire articles about her in significant newspapers.  She meets  easily.  An editorial decision to redirect isn't crazy, but A) there is plenty here to write about IMO and B) such a discussion does not belong at AfD, it belongs on the article talk page. She meets our inclusion guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Meets .  Article is improved with reliable sources to show subject is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)