Deletion of Statue of Thomas Cass

Comment: the sourcing in this article was, to be frank, almost as bad as on the fictional characters, no-hit wonders, and professional puffery that normally populate AfD.  To be fair, the NYT article is actually fairly extensive, both describing the statue and some of the circumstances surrounding its installation, but as referenced in the article it was impossible to access.  It didn't even include such helpful things as a non-hidden version of the date of publish.  I have fixed that. Nevertheless, one reference notability does not confer. I have, however, found sources ranging from Boston to Columbus Nebraska (which might be a re-print of a national agency) describing the statue, the process of its commission, creation, installation, and unveiling, and public reaction to it.  Considering that I had to modify the search terms to find anything useful and that the sources in the article before I messed with it were all either bad or inaccessible, I think that excoriating the nominator for a lack of  is out of line
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Coverage in the ''New York Times''. {{U|AnUnnamedUser}}, please read 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There are lots of sources for this. Nom failed to do 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: meets , article has been subsequently well sourced since nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)