Deletion of Engrish (2nd nomination)

Comment: multiple high quality reliable sources, including articles in a journal published by Cambridge University Press. Tyros, you seem to be laboring under the misapprehension that sources must be available online to be considered reliable; please read Wikipedia:Offline sources and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCEACCESS)

Comment: it's well written and well sourced. It could be perceived as racist, but Wikipedia is not correct and  is not a legitimate deletion argument. If the article spawns racist arguments on the talk page, then that will be dealt with when it happens. Pre-emptive deletion, or even protection is overreacting. TheOneSean &#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:THEYDONTLIKEIT)