Deletion of MA-05 Bigro

Comment: this. Perhaps a severely condensed portion could be merged somewhere, but much of this seems to be , which means merging it would be a bad idea
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per . In the case of Fictional items,  would supercede the cited policies, as it makes no sense otherwise (why have a seperate specific policy for a fictional items if it's outranked by a more general policy?) If there's a problem with having fictional material on Wikipedia, nominator should propose changes to policy instead of trying to backdoor his way through
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:FICT)

Comment: It's not even close to , it's simply a case of bad citing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: no assertion of notability even within the fictional universe. While minor characters/places/things can be merged, trivial things should just be deleted as #IINFO|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:RS is also only a guideline.  is a policy, but there are numerous websites  (both commercial and fanmade), as well as books and booklets published by the company that contain this information. Therefore, it passes verifiability. Furthermore, NO WHERE in  is it stated that a source must be from outside  the area that the article topic is from
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)