Deletion of Paakaati Po

Comment: does not meet  or , which are the agreed guidelines for films
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILM)

Comment: No reliable independent reviews. Fails .  As to the "Cinema.com" citation, that's a film database site which provides no indication that the film is notable, just that it exists.  The "Varnam" might be a reliable source, except that the article is just a notice that the film was released and that it has a trailer. Again, that doesn't prove the film is notable...only that the film exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: May be a rising film in its genre" is a speculation, with clearly no hard proof to back it up. Wikipedia is NOT a |crystal ball. The only ''fact'' here is that currently the article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL||WP:NFILM)

Comment: As per Donaldd23's first rationale above. Also, even the changes made fail to provide anything substantial to indicate notability. Infact, highly motivated creator LoveFromBJM's failed attempts at finding reliable, in-depth coverage for the film just goes to show that it just does not have the neccessary specs to statisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)