Deletion of Ryder Scott (2nd nomination)

Comment: or fix). Since the last time it was listed, no independent |reliable sources have been provided. In the meantime, Wikipedia has collectively raised their standards regarding sourcing. The company appears to be an important, albeit niche, player in the petroleum industry; there might actually be some decent reliable sources out there, but they're likely tucked away in industry publications like a Society of Petroleum Engineers newsletter or in specialized industry books; the kinds of thinks that only a specialist editor is likely to have easy access to. Personally, I'd rather have no article than a piece solely sourced by the subjects materials
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)