Deletion of The Journal Jurisprudence

Comment: This appears to be a new academic journal, written by academics, not a mere magazine to be thrown away when read.  There have been a series of discussions of existing academic journals (usually for those covering narrow specialisations).  As far as I recall they have normally been kept.  This is a new journal, so that coverage elsewhere cannot be expected yet.  The website implies that it is available to download, so that this is not a question of |future events.  This is a harmless little article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: that could be used for anything - a "harmless little piece" of advertising doesn't make it |notable enough to warrant inclusion - there are inclusion guidelines for a reason, otherwise this would just be a big combination of myspace and the Yellow Pages. This isn't an attack upon academic journals ''per se'', any notable journal is welcome here, but the only reason this one is here is to give it some promotion and hike up its ranking on a Google search. There has most certainly not been ''significant coverage'' - or any other notability within its own field, and AfDs don't operate on precedents - every nomination is assessed on an individual basis, so any other (obviously more notable) journals being kept is of little relevance. This clearly fails our |notability guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: very unlikely to be notable as soon as its first issue is even published. Suspect 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)