Deletion of Harry Lionel Churchill

Comment: Holder of the CMG, which is held to be notable under  #1. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Shaw (healthcare administrator) for the confirmation. The CMG is an equal award to the CBE in a more senior order, so if the CBE is notable then the CMG certainly is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: The consensus on previous AfDs seems to be that a CBE makes someone notable.  Since a CMG is a more exclusive and "higher" rank, then H.L. Churchill should be notable.  All of the coverage I found was routine, but 1)  is an event notability guideline - attempts to apply it to all subjects have been rejected in the past.  2) Better sources may well exist since only a small portion of contemporary sources are available online
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: I'm not convinced that the CMG provides automatic notability in Wikipedia terms. It indicates that the holder was thought to have done a good job, but this doesn't necessarily translate into Wikipedia-handy sources, which this man seems to be lacking despite a clearly solid career. If he didn't have the CMG there would be little question here but that the article shd be deleted as principally genealogical; and the addition of the CMG without sources doesn't seem to me to tip the balance.  itself surely supports this: "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards incl WP:ANYBIO #1. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included". (bolding mine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ANYBIO)