Deletion of Philip Sandifer

Comment: An extremely compelling story. Meets minimum requirements of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP)

Comment: Perhaps this article should be renamed/moved to something like "Police harassment of online author Phil Sandifer." The story is compelling on its own and would not suffer the requirements of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Were this not an article about someone who edits wikipedia, there would be no need for debate, it would be a simple delete per .  We certainly should ''not'' relax our biography standards simply because the subject edits wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: failing .  This is just a minor news story
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per Bjelleklang and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I've had a hard time deciding on this, but I just am not convinced he meets  without considerable bending of the current language. I'm sorry if people see this as wonk-ish of me to vote delete after all this, hopefully my actions in the DRV weren't hopelessly incomprehensible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)