Deletion of The Downfall of France’s Delegated Minister of Budget: Jérôme Cahuzac

Comment: per . I don't have the depth of background knowledge on French politics to know whether l'Affaire Cahuzac ''really'' meets the rarefied standard necessary to qualify for a standalone article as a separate topic from his existing . But what I do know for sure is (a) even if it does meet the notability standard for events, ''this'' as written is ''not'' the article that gets it there, and (b) his BLP on en is quite short and can accomodate the content without needing a separate spinoff (whereas his BPV en français is considerably longer). We do not write Wikipedia articles in the ''first'' person, for just ''one'' example of the ''many'' problems here. A ''neutral'' presentation in Jérôme Cahuzac would be fine; ''this'', as written, is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY||WP:BLP)

Comment: As above, . Some of this can surely be incorporated into the main article, if it is done in a neutral manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: per . Reading through the creator's user page, the idea was apparently to create an English equivalent of :fr:Affaire Cahuzac. However, the result is clearly not encyclopedic, especially in the sections after the background
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: Wikipedia is not an essay repo per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)