Deletion of James A. Shapiro

Comment: GS h-index of 38, even in highly cited field, passes rof#C1 with ease. Absurd nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: WoS concurs with the GS results: h-index around 28 with several sole-authored papers having hundreds of cites. Conclusive "keep" on  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per #C1 and #C3. I added the AAAS Fellow to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: and remind the nominator of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: none of these 'keep' !votes address the "lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject", and the fact that  clearly states that lacking such sources a topic may "not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia" even if it meets specific criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per Xxanthippe. Clear pass of . -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.148|202.124.73.148
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)