Deletion of Georgetown Bagelry

Comment: Utter spam. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Reader's polls on "best bagel" are mentions-in-passing and fail . Someone mentioned above that the coverage about the owner's book but misses the point that none of the information is therefore Independent Content and fails . Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: I see no reason to discount the Washington Post as a "local" source. If a Topeka business were covered in a Kansas statewide paper, then it would clearly meet the definition of "regional" in . I don't see why coverage of an area with a population of over 6 million should be inferior to coverage of an area with a population of less than 3 million, so IMO the Washington Post is a ''regional'' source for the DC metropolitan area (a ''region''). https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/food/1981/09/24/bringing-home-the-bagels/4861e047-6097-4f0c-bce3-bf1a8a4fc083/ That source, along with the https://archive.vn/20130630174203/http://www.wtop.com/109/1373231/Georgetown-Bagelry-Closes-M-Street-Shop local coverage in WTOP, combine to constitute significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, at least one of which is more than local. I am sympathetic to DGG's point about "a directory or every restaurant in a city with a major newspaper", but likewise we can ask: Do we want to be a directory of every restaurant in a small state with a statewide paper? Currently,  says yes, and to go against it would either be a , or require believing that the media market of a major metropolitan area is not as important as the media market of a small state
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:AUD||WP:LOCALCONSENSUS)

Comment: The topic is notable as there's plenty of coverage in numerous sources.  Meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  I did some work to the article - added RS and fixed, layout, added a logo etc. I am able to find abundant RS: we follow the RS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)