Deletion of Australia–Kosovo relations

Comment: Bilateral relations are ''not'' inherently notable, even when Kosovo is involved. Significant coverage of relations in reliable, independent sources makes a topic notable (see  if you don't believe me), and that's something this topic lacks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No |secondary sources discuss these relations. Fails . Mattinbgn gave a link ("This one took five seconds to find") above, but the http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AJHR/2003/15.html article only illustrates the gap in understanding between those who want to keep and those who want to delete these meaningless articles. The article ''mentions'' Australia and Kosovo (in connection with refugees, and in comparison with Canada's reaction), but the article in no way asserts there is any ongoing or notable relation between Australia and Kosovo. The recognition of Kosovo's independence, and the Kosovo refugee information, is notable, but that should be in an article on the development of Kosovo where it is important (it has no importance to Australia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Notable bilateral relation. Could be expanded even further with inclusion of the details of the large number of Kosovar refugees taken by Australia on the then unique Temporary Protection Visas.http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AJHR/2003/15.html This caused quite a controversy at the time as it was a step away from the usual approach taken by successive Australian governments to immigration, then geared around permanent residency. Many of these refugees were placed in Tasmania, where the community fought hard to keep them in the country. These nominations are nearly always based on  and . The moral panic about these bilateral articles (Oh no, there are 40,000 possible combinations ... ) is misplaced and laughable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:INEVERHEARDOFIT)

Comment: As habanero-tan pointed out (in relation to Exploding chicken), "(t)he general phenomena itself, Australia-Kosovo relations, has not been covered sufficiently by independent sources to pass . Collecting examples and synthesizing an article from them in order to advance the position that it is a notable phenomena is original research ."  In other words, recognizing a country as a country, "supporting the rights and safety" of minorities there, etc. doesn't make their relations notable as a topic for an article.  An alternative to deletion would be a redirect ot International recognition of Kosovo but it is, frankly, an unlikely search phrase, especially with the em dash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SYN)