Deletion of Persecution of Falun Gong

Comment: Let's develop one article first. After that, on the title, media manipulation by the PRC and Falun Gong are both prevalent and are equally unacceptable. "Persecution" is simply too loaded a term to be used here on WP, especially considering that the BBC, widely respected for its objectivity, refrains from using the word in an unqualified form. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&action=historysubmit&diff=320429389&oldid=320266695 As Sinneed noted, there were far, far, far too many loaded terms in the article which this sort of title just invites, and to carry on editing the article in that vein without addressing the root cause of the problem as far as the article is concerned is just cloud cuckoo land. The loaded wording has been there almost from the start, and it was bad enough when the article was named 'Suppression', when it started becoming |an attack page of the government of the People's Republic of China. But at that stage, it was the content posted mainly by the FLG possee which they used as a pretext to change it from the consensus version back to 'Persecution
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACK)

Comment: because History of Falun Gong and Persecution of Falun  Gong are obviously two different topics, of these I'm not sure if "History of  Falun Gong" is notable enough, because sources exists only since 1992, but  "Persecution of Falun Gong" is something that is strongly documented, and  sources include, United Nations, Amnesty International, US Government, etc...  Since the topics are different I don't see  here, and as it is  mentioned bellow Notability is not even being questioned
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: Declaration of interest: I have been asked to get involved in Falun Gong issues. I have no vested interest in the topic - I feel certain that both sides in the dispute will agree that I am neutral, fair, and dedicated to NPOV and accurate sourcing. I created the Persecution of Falun Gong article with a crude cut and paste from History of Falun Gong - there is much editing to be done to make both articles fit for purpose. However, it meets  as there are many reliable sources on the topic of "persecution of Falun Gong" http://books.google.co.uk/books?client=firefox-a&rlz=1R0GGGL_en&hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Persecution%20of%20Falun%20Gong%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp. It is not a  as the intention of the creation of the article is to deal appropriately with the topic in a NPOV manner  The discussion in which the reason is explained is here:  Talk:History_of_Falun_Gong#Contesting_the_legitimacy_of_the_move_to_the_new_name
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: History keeps repeating itself. There is no place in Wikiverse for yet another battlefield where Falun Gong |single-purpose accounts can feel at home and |pontificate and |push their point of view. It was renamed by consensus (after RfC) and now it's back. I don't actually feel it's productive to delete it at this stage because there seem to be some dedicated people willing to roll their sleeves up to fix this. So keep it as you will, but remember that one more article which is now automatically subject to Arbcom probation, like a baby born into captivity. Surely not a sane way to proceed considering the History of Falun Gong has not even found its feet. As the persecution is the most important subset of the history of FLG (other than the fairy tale of its creation), I actually think the best thing is to '''redirect''' it back to 'History of Falun Gong', until such time that article is stable and mature, and we can spin out the content in a controlled manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:ADVOCACY||WP:NPOV)