Deletion of List of vaccine topics

Comment: Selection and grouping of items violates , ,  and , and is not based on any such listing or grouping in reliable independent sources. Grossly violates ; list items seem to be selected and cherry picked from dubious sources based on their political utility. Strong POV in favor of the fringe anti-vaccinationist view. Clearly violates , as the content is already present in other articles. Of limited or no navigational value. POV fork of :Category:Vaccination. Clearly a politically motivated stunt to promote the anti-vaccinationist cause. No point in keeping the list in the hope that it will one day be improved to the point of encyclopedic significance or utility. If there ever is a genuine need for such a list, it can be created from scratch, not on the basis of this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:GEVAL||WP:UNDUE||WP:NLIST||WP:CFORK)

Comment: certainly can use some trimming and sourced annotations of many entries would significantly improved the useability of the list, but there's no doubt this list meets the requirements of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:list)

Comment: Nom argues that this list is duplicative of a category.  That is an invalid deletion argument and should be wholly ignored.   specificially allows redundancy between lists and categories and is also cited as an argument to avoid in Wikipedia:ATA#Other_arguments_to_avoid|Arguments to avoid
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: This appears to be a random group of topics, rather than an encyclopedic listing. Appears to fail , in that this particular grouping does not appear to be discussed in reliable sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: while I initially suspected this would be relatively redundant of Vaccine, the content is really not; Vaccine ably covers the scientific background/basis of the topic, but much of what is linked to from List of vaccine topics is not covered there as it doesn't quite fall under the scope of what that article concentrates on. Per various parts of  (i.e. section "Information"), this article seems acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)