Deletion of The Cryptkeeper Five

Comment: Unfortunately, I don't really see anything but trivial mentions and unreliable sources.  The few |reliable sources that mention them are basically tour dates or other |routine coverage.  |Self-published blogs don't count as reliable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SPS)

Comment: The article establishes that the band has been covered in at least 2 published books, as well as in at least a half dozen reputable newspapers and/or magazines. The "published books" and "press coverage" section includes references to this coverage. References that are reputable, non-trivial, and non-routine include: Spartanburg Herald, The Press of Atlantic City, Chorus and Verse (Steppin' Out (magazine)|Steppin' Out Magazine journalist), as well as the Gary Wien and Mick Mercer books. I would also include the ''Ink 19'' concert review in this category as well, with the caveats that that magazine doesn't have a Wiki page and the band were the support act (nevertheless considered significant enough to be given non trivial coverage in the article). Finally, down in the discography there are links to album reviews from :de:Ox-Fanzine|Ox-Fanzine, which is a serious enough German music magazine. Meets criteria 1 of usic|music notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)