Deletion of Dragon Dice (video game)

Comment: as a notable video game passing  with multiple reliable in-depth (reviews) sources, such as /RS. To elaborate against some arguments above: notability is  -- being covered by reliable sources. It doesn't matter if it's positive, negative, success, failure, review, history, etc. We don't conclude anything from the content. It's the presence of content that determines notability. When the content is fleshed out and we can see how much there is, we can consider merging, but that's an editorial decision, not based on notability. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per nom, no significant coverage in multiple independent sources to show it meets . Not enough standalone notability. A redirect would be okay, since the video game is covered in the target, but the redirect keeps getting moved back to an article. So if a redirect is the decision, then the redirect needs page protection
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)