Deletion of Global warming conspiracy theory (2nd nomination)

Comment: Maybe one day someone will produce a 'site map' of all the global warming articles. There's Climate change at the top, with Global warming (the current climate change) under that. Then maybe we have Global warming controversy below that, off to one side alongside many other scientific, social, political, economic and other high-level sub-articles. Under Global warming controversy we have a spectrum from current and past legitimate scientific and other academic controversies played out in peer reviewed journals at one end, through to the other end where this article and Climate change denial have their rightful places. We seem to be suffering from a small 'denial of the conspiracy theories' push from a few editors at the moment, but that does not change the facts as per the sources. There is not an article on Wikipedia that cannot be improved and updated, but there is no argument for deleting this. It is a |notable topic that has gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and is not excluded for any other reason. This attention can be shown by considering the evidence from reliable independent sources such as published journals, books, and newspapers, as shown by the four dozen refs in the article at the moment, and many more to be found by simple searches
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Not the best written article at the moment, but the topic is covered by |reliable sources as cited.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)