Deletion of Jashodaben Modi (3rd nomination)

Comment: The sources listed by Reywas92 are very convincing and more than enough for -based notability. They are all primarily about the subject, in-depth, appear reliable, and span a wide range of years. Nomination is based on a blatant misunderstanding of NOTINHERITED: it does not prevent someone related to more-famous topics from having articles, if they themselves are also notable. For instance, most sources about Narendra Modi are going to mention the country of India, a more notable topic than Narendra Modi; nevertheless, Narendra Modi is also notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Blatant case of  as per my assessment of sources above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: the coverage of the subject has been  and satisfies  even if in relationship to Modi
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:GNG)

Comment: I voted in this article's 2nd AFD. In 2014, there was not the |significant coverage to merit retaining it. However, several years later, the situation has changed and there is a ton of sustained coverage. Like Modi or not, his wife is notable on her own now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)