Deletion of Zeitgeist: Addendum (2nd nomination)

Comment: Sources must be considered in context to the subject." - No, they don't. All we need are reliable sources (, ). What you posted were all blog posts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: To those who believe the film is notable because it won an award from the Artivists: The relevant guigdeline is , which states that notability may be achieved by winning a "major award" which the Artivists award certainly is not, with the minute coverage that festival has received. The film also obviously fails all other criteria listed in NF. And the film still fails the general notability criterion in its entirety. The keep arguments above me come out more like requests that the guidelines simply be bent or ignored for this article than an actual argument for being notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)