Deletion of List of Wii modchips

Comment: The above arguments are actually in favour of keeping modchip. This list violates #DIR and should be deleted as a product catalogue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Modchips are discussed in gaming and general press every now and then, at least enough to fill . Also, just because something's illegal, doesn't mean we can't have an article on it. What would an encyclopedia be without articles on cannabis, prostitution, murder, jaywalking (lol), etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: This list of mod chips reads like (a list) an advertisement, has no evidence of |notability, nor any |reliable, non-primary sources.Further, I recommend the '''extension of discussion''' as I've only http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wii_modchips&diff=177304420&oldid=177109493 just now added the fD|AfD notice to the page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:A)

Comment: This article is especially valid because some people believe that creating backups of copy protected games is illegal and immoral.  Consumers need unbiased articles to make informed decisions, especially when the topic is likely to besmirch the reputation of typical reliable sources such as gaming magazines.  With regards to the comment on #DIR, this page is no less important than the List of antivirus software.  I, however, agree that the article needs cleaning so it's more of a description of the various features and which modchips have which features
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)