Deletion of Colonial/Modern Gender System

Comment: Regardless of the author, this is a |neologism discussed by one person. A discussion of cultural constructions of gender should be at gender
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: as per Roscelese and Troutman and Orasis, okay, everybody up there, plus an additional problem is that it is essentially |original research by one scholar, an Argentinian-born radical feminist, which would be permitted in Wikipedia if there were reliable |secondary sources commenting on the theory, explaining it, arguing with or against it, but I did not find sufficient evidence of this happening. I did not find the term used in my numerous newspaper sweeps; I did find a source http://books.google.com/books?id=tDCuX0y6ZnMC&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66&dq=%22colonial+modern+gender+system%22&source=bl&ots=WR8-TRKaNC&sig=YPc6qB8_oRHUxvvTRRgwktYhUSY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ljwcVIO_Afb8sASM04GADg&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=%22colonial%20modern%20gender%20system%22&f=false here which discusses her theory at length by another scholar named Alison Bailey. My searches without filters did not find much which was not written by Lugones. QED delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SECONDARY)