Deletion of LLBLGen Pro

Comment: It is entirely notable and easily passes . It is a well respected and well used code generator for domain/ORM layer generation and is probably in the top 5 products of it category, on the go for the last 10 years. Why is it being nominated again
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but stubify - there appears to be sources enough to clear the  threshold, but most of the current content is not supported by those sources, being marketing-speak or feature lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)