Deletion of Rob Ager (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm unsure about this. Notability for YouTubers (and other people mostly known for what they do online) is always a bit tricky to assess. Ager would certainly pass  criterion 2: {{tq|Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following}}, but that has since been deprecated (I learned upon looking it up for this AfD). His videos/essays/theories/analyses have been cited a fair number of times as demonstrated above, but I'm not convinced that he meets either  or  on account of this (I don't know that I would consider a chemist or journalist notable based on this level of coverage of their work). It might be better to cover what Ager says about specific pieces of media in the corresponding media articles (e.g. Interpretations of 2001: A Space Odyssey and The Shining (film)#Spatial layout of the Overlook Hotel, as noted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Ager|the previous AfD nomination) in  proportion rather than having a biographical article where such content would (at least in my mind) seem a bit out of place. I would be interested in what the people who participated in the previous AfD back in 2015 think. {{ping|Silent Key|Ianmacm|Ormr2014|Shrillpicc100}} Care to weigh in
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NENTERTAINER||WP:NSCHOLAR||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:DUE)