Deletion of Thingbox

Comment: I've logged onto this website and found the forums urging people to vote in favour of keeping this article.  There is probably sock puppetry going on too.  As a result, this entry will probably get more keeps than deletes.  The number of unregistered comments (and keep votes from people without day to day editing experience of wikipedia) suggest this is being portrayed as a vote.  However, the AFD process is not a vote - its a balancing act.  Clearly this article does not meet the requirements of .  If we were being very flexible and allowing Alexa to have a say in this, we can even see then that the website is not notable at all.  Other LGBT websites such as gaydar and out are notable by their size, press commentry and, as such, meet .  Thingbox does not.  One day it might.  But for the moment, Thingbox is not encylopaedic at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: I wouldn't say there are a lot of sockpuppets per se, but many new Wikipedia accounts and several older ones who haven't edited in a while suddenly showing up to participate here.  That suggests someone is campaigning on Thingbox itself for Thingbox members to press for retention.  AfD campaigning of any kind is considered a no-no; see also the "Meatpuppet" discussion at .  Closing admin should examine the contrib history of all participants and weight accordingly.  Remember "AfD is not a vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)

Comment: Its not reasonable because it doesn't fulfill the requirement of ! Other gay online websites (such as gaydar, out etc) do meet these requirements but, frankly, Thingbox is far too small and has no encylopaedic notability.  Gaydar is a phenomonen, OUT has notability in the national press and is much larger
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I appreciate that - but it still need to meet  - currently it doesn't
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Ruby on Rails does not make it notable per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)