Deletion of Giant GRB Ring

Comment: have found what appears to be" is what killed it for me - one group of researchers think they found something, but with no other corroboration it's just a theory. Everything is directly related to either the paper itself or the RAS press release. The Discovery article is the only one that didn't just copy/paste it verbatim on their own pages (though the majority of the information is identical). Fails |NASTRO and is definitely |TOOSOON
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: There is only one source published about this GRB ring (hence original research and .) When there are multiple, reliable sources to verify the article may be recreated. --Special:Contributions/189.106.231.36|189.106.231.36
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)