Deletion of Periodic table (large version)

Comment: I second {{u|Northamerica1000}}  call. It is an absolutely encyclopedic reference table. Think of it as the colour plates that some paper encyclopedias insert within their volumes. We should have more of these, not less
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: per . A very useful page that receives thousands of page hits per month (http://stats.grok.se/en/201407/Periodic_table_(large_version) 20,373 in July 2014). In this case, deletion will not improve the encyclopedia; rather, it would diminish it. It is also classified as a featured list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: about the most textbook case of  I have ever seen. This is clearly incredibly useful to readers, and deleting it would harm the encyclopedia by removing useful information. Northamerica1000 sums it up quite well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)