Deletion of Nicholas A. Jeffress

Comment: Having been the executive director of a ''local'' chapter of a national political party, even if it's the local chapter in the capital city, is not in and of itself a valid claim of standalone notability — and the sourcing here is nowhere near strong enough to claim . I note that the nominator appears to be the subject himself — and was also the ''creator'' of the article, in defiance of our |conflict of interest rules — so I will note that the deletion rationale provided was not a valid one as (a) notability is not temporary (i.e. a person who was notable because of a public role they held does not ''lose'' that notability just because they leave the role later on), and (b) our content policies, not the subject's own wishes, determine whether the article stays or goes. But I can't argue for a keep on that basis. This is not an article about a person who was formerly notable enough for an article but isn't anymore — it's an article about a person who never met our inclusion standards to begin with. All of that said,  does also come into play here, as an article about a low-profile individual who has personally requested deletion, but that remains secondary to the fact that this article should never have been created in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COI||WP:BIODEL)

Comment: The position of Executive Director of a national political party is usually deleted per . The leader of the Republican Party would be the Chair, not the Executive Director
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: Hi {{u|Njeffress}}, please see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)