Deletion of Ignazio Ciufolini (2nd nomination)

Comment: He passed #C1 back Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignazio Ciufolini|in 2013, and he passes it now. Some mentions of awards were indeed cut https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignazio_Ciufolini&type=revision&diff=623859557&oldid=623840802 in 2014; these were of the type that are normally included in academic biographies and could be added back in again. As to the allegations of academic misconduct, Retraction Watch is a |reliable source for these purposes. And we don't delete articles just because they might be embarrassing for their subjects. There's nothing here that would make deletion a good course of action
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:RS)

Comment: Notability is unambiguous.   is for cases where the notability is marginal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPDELETEREQUEST)

Comment: Clearly passes . Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: meets  as recipient of Institute of Physics Awards#Bilateral Awards|Giuseppe Occhialini Medal and Prize (https://www.iop.org/about/awards/bilateral/occhialini/medallists/page_38497.html#gref here), Association of American Publishers#Activities|1995 PROSE Award (https://proseawards.com/winners/1995-award-winners/ here), Tomassoni awards#Recipients|2001 Premio Caterina Tomassoni e Felice Pietro Chisesi Prize (https://www.phys.uniroma1.it/DipWeb/tommasoni/prizes.html here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Reading the article right now, I do not see any immediate bias, POV, or potentially libelous statements... and looking at the edit history, I find it hard to believe it is much of a target for any attention at all with less than 30 edits in the last 5 years... and none reverted as vandalism or POV, and no signs at all of edit warring... as far as your comment about having the time and will to watch and correct it, unless you have been using |multiple accounts, this account is less than a month old with zero edits to the article in question besides the deletion request, how much time have you spent trying to fix the alleged issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)