Deletion of Hunting (House)

Comment: Sources for this notable topic are readily available as I have demonstrated by adding one - took all of a minute.  All the comments above which are based upon an assumption that there are no sources are thus voided.  Please see our |deletion and |editing policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Notable show, big fan base makes for notable episodes. I wish deletionist energy would be better directed, god knows there's plenty of crap that needs attention without attacking the fanzine-style episode treatments that Wikipedia users seem to love. And no, not  because it's a case of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IVENEVERSEENIT||WP:CALLINGASPADEASPADE)

Comment: as consisting wholly of |plot and a handful of |external links and |unreferenced production minutiae
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:EL||WP:V)

Comment: to House (season 2). I guess there may one or two episodes that can be expanded to B-Class, but at the moment these articles just consist of plot (#PLOT) and sometimes which songs played in an episode (i.e. practically only trivial real-world info). Redirect the articles first and allow only those ep articles to be recreated that provide sufficient real-world info ''in the article''. Otherwise the plot summary can fit in the season article. A book covering all episodes does not mean every episode is individually notable. I have always been opposed to using TV Squad to establish notability of episodes since they cover all episodes of certain series, and that usually in a poor fashion. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)