Deletion of India and state terrorism

Comment: I am sorry to say but this is a bad faith article developed by Yousuf. The user was prevented at State-sponsored terrorism with his POV push ( he was even blocked for this) but now attempting a POV fork out of this article. MOst of the references are attributed to Pak dailies which cannot be attributed as |Reliable sources in this case for the reason that is obvious
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per  and . The concept "India and state terrorism" is unique to Wikipedia (a google search reveals 7 articles, four of which are wikipedia) and an encyclopedia is not the place for new concepts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: easy per riginal research. Special:Contributions/98.119.177.171|98.119.177.171
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: Per , . This article, if allowed to remain on WP, would become a place to push PoV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: A bunch of |synthesis. A lot of this is the "he said, she said" type of accusations between India and Pakistan. Given the history between India and Pakistan, it's obvious that there's a lot of bad blood between these two nations. Unless there's accusations being leveled by third-party governments or the United Nations, I don't see any merit for this article. Besides, some of this information seems to be misleading. The Pakistani government cleared the RAW of any involvement in the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team. In addition, the LTTE and the BLA are ''militant'', not ''terrorist'' organizations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as , , and based on non-|reliable sources. ''None'' of the ''Reliable'' Sources used in the article refer to "Indian State Terrorism" or "Indian State Sponsored Terrorism" that I could see. Using only reliable sources there is no article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: per  and . Any article that contains even the slightest amount of original research and synthesis should have no place in Wikipedia if that article put a country in poor light
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per riginal research and ynthesis. except for the shady article at The Barossa (whose credibilty is in question), no reliable sources claim that all the events described in the article is state terrorism. It is a beautiful work of synthesis and original research putting together a lot of random and unrelated information under this invented title. may be try in a reliable journal first and in wikipedia later on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:S)

Comment: We don't keep articles because "''india blames Pakistan for state terrorism''" and "''Pakistan also blames India''". We do however, delete if the article is entirely riginal research and ynthesis as this one is. To understand these policies, one has to see how the sources have been manipulated to push a certain agenda. The conclusions that the article makes are from the author whereas the sources only deal with fact, hence synthesis. Also it seems that the creator has been proven to be a sockpuppet of a banned editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:S)