Deletion of Red light therapy

Comment: as a non-notable bit of pseudoscience, now much reduced without the glowing woo. If one day proper controlled trials are carried out, then we might be able to cover it, but without reliable sources this fails  and indeed 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  WhatamIdoing.  There is confusion in this discussion between notability and proven effectiveness.  Notability ''does not'' require that clinical trials have taken place.  It does not even require that there are  present in the article.  A subject can still meet notability through  without that, and the fact that a reputable publisher (Simon & Schuster) has https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BG7PDwAAQBAJ published a book on the subject is enough to cross that hurdle imo.  Of course, we should not be presenting the claims about the treatment as facts without MEDRS to back up those claims.  But we can still discuss those claims and we are doing our readers a service by having the article and highlighting the lack of medical evidence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:GNG)