Deletion of Suzen Johnson (2nd nomination)

Comment: This woman is completely un-important and just because she was on the cover of Playboy once out of the hundreds does not have grounds for notability. I agree with the original poster in that the article is in violation on WP:BLP1E in that she is only known for one event that is not significant and also violates it because she stayed low after the entire scandal. I also believe that it is in violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF)

Comment: selectively to Frank Gifford#Affair; not independently notable. Most of the article is about the unmasking of the affair, which is relevant to Gifford and can go in his article. Claims about her subsequent fame are poorly referenced (e.g. info about her website is only referenced to the website, which hardly shows it was significant) and she seems to have faded from public consciousness after a couple of years (aside from the occasional mentions in articles on Frank Gifford, which do nothing to establish her independent notability). There's a few mentions online in non- websites that chronicle everyone who ever appeared in Playboy, but aside from that, I'm not seeing evidence that her fame goes beyond a single event
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The only content that isn't about the affair is a bit of  about a website that apparently nobody cared about— otherwise, it would have been sourced better
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: this ''might'' be worth a statement in the Gifford article, if that.  Every source discusses her only in context of the affair -> .  &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: this is the kind of thing  was designed for.  Absent the affair and the media hype, this person was just a flight attendant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Frank_Gifford#Affair.  This is mostly a case of , even if the 1E did generate quite a bit of controversy and meta-commentary
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)