Deletion of Grounding (earthing) culture

Comment: Per , quality issues are not a reason to delete.  Per , "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.''".  The sources such as this https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3265077/ review demonstrate that the topic is notable and so there's plenty of scope for further work.  Note that we also have earthing therapy which currently redirects to nature therapy which doesn't say much about it and so this would be a better target.  There's also barefoot which also doesn't say much about this.  Me, I'm generating  lots of Static electricity|static in the current weather and that's certainly not good for electronic devices.  Maybe I should give this a try
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:ATD)

Comment: Already covered at Nature therapy.  The fact that there is not much on it in that article is simply due to the fact that there are so few legitimate sources on this  pseudoscience.  There is nothing of worth here that would be appropriate to merge, and the article title would not make for a useful Redirect term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Per {{u|Reyk}} ... they said it perfectly. Having articles about total nonsense fringe theories is fine, if they have some notability. I've done a lot of reading on pseudoscience and this one is new to me. If anything, perhaps it should be merged into Electromagnetic hypersensitivity though the sources used here are pretty poor and I still think '''Delete''' is best. Also, the writer(s) of this article appear to be drawing conclusions or ing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)