Deletion of Pedro Salgado

Comment: I disagree with the two delete !votes strongly on whether the sources are routine - they're clearly, in my mind, significant coverage of a player. Even though the SoyChile covered him when he was in the second division, not all Temuco players receive that level of coverage. The fact other sources demonstrably exist on Salgado as well, although we can't easily access them - such as LUN's ''El futuro de Chile va a jugar con Manchester United'' from 2009 and Mercurio articles about Catolica playing youth in the cups - makes the  pass clear
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  and I'm finding a fair amount on him, mostly his appearances for Chile U-17s and U-20s, he even trialled at Manchester United - https://www.24horas.cl/deportes/futbol-nacional/para-recordar-10-promesas-del-futbol-chileno-que-pasaron-al-olvido-2142236 https://strettynews.com/2012/07/04/henriquez-the-tale-of-a-chilean-prodigy/, and haven't specifically searched in Spanish yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: per SF, meets  and likely passes GNG. Needs improving, not deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: I think I am with {{u|Levivich}} on this one. While the player might technically pass NFOOTY, this is incredibly marginal, and the guideline itself specifically notes that it is a rule of thumb which does not require us to keep articles which meet it - this seem like precisely the kind of case that caveat was intended for. I can't see any sources which establish notability for this player (I'd also note that #1 from Levivich uses Salgado as an example of a player who did not make it, and #2 and #3 are lists of promising young Chilean players who were not successful). Concerning the sources from {{u|SportingFlyer}} that are accessible, I don't see anything which goes beyond |routine coverage. 6 and 7 look like routine coverage about a player transfer; they might technically be about Salgado but I can't see them conferring notability. The fact that a player might not be able to be picked for a match does not make them notable. 8 also seems to be routine transfer coverage, as does 9. 10 appears to be a routine story about the player not being registered for the team's squad due to an injury. (Of course, with all of these, I am relying on Google Translate; I would be happy to be corrected by someone with a better knowledge of Spanish). Perhaps the two sources which I can't access are enough to satisfy GNG but, at this stage, that cannot be verified. Given the very marginal pass of NFOOTY and the fact that (in my assessment) the SoyChile articles provide no more than routine coverage, I have no reason to suppose without evidence that these further sources would be the in-depth, reliable coverage we are after. Of course, if someone can find a working link - or even access the sources themselves and describe their contents to us - then I would be happy to reconsider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)