Deletion of Bay Valley Foods

Comment: per nom and per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The Corp itself is not notable per , the intentions of the article creator are highly suspect. This is essentially an assassination piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: stealth attack page; original research that is not even supported by the citations given;  unverifiable sources and '''no''' secondary reliable sources (or unreliable - not even a blog post) provided (or found in independent searching) to support claims; potentially libelous; does not meet  - and all of the other comments I made into the wee hours last night on the talk page, and the comments made here by an array of editors.  Further, based on several comments made by the only contributor to  the page - both on its talk page and elsewhere around the encyclopedia -  I believe this page was created with political motives  as a dirty trick - perhaps to  use a Wikipedia article as evidence of claims that seem not to have been reported ''anywhere'' else.   I am not often in the "delete" camp on Afds,  but this is  an open-and-shut classic case for deletion and I wholeheartedly endorse the action
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: as POV-pushing |synthesis of primary sources. There are no citations from secondary sources to indicate whether this particular plant's emissions are significantly out of the norm or have caused independent third parties to be concerned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: The major issue here is not presentation. The material on pollution is a textbook example of '''|original research'''. No notable secondary sources are cited: the page explicitly presents primary sources, and draws its own conclusions. (Look for sentence beginning "''Therefore, this facility''".) The source for visible smoke plumes is an email address. The guidelines advise that articles should be based mainly on secondary sources; this helps ensure notability and neutrality. This page is making an argument, not just presenting information. With OR material removed, there's nothing left but a list of products, which is an advertisement. The page fails . ''&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:CORP)