Deletion of Brian Morris (biologist)

Comment: Easily meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). I conducted a GS-based citation analysis for "Brian Morris" with the following keyword-based restrictions: biology "University of Sydney" Australia. Even with these restrictions, which should go a long way toward ruling out false positives (and actually lead to many false negatives), the h-index turned out to be 39
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I checked Web of Science (usually giving much lower citation rates than GS) and find 10 articles cited >100, over 6000 (six THOUSAND) citations in total, and an h-index of 43. No doubt at all that this passes #1. Any article issues can be handled on the article talk page. As for the canvassing, that is borderline admissible, as Tremello did not ask anybody to come here and !vote "delete", just asked them to come and give their opinion. I strongly suggest the nom to withdraw this AfD or that it be closed speedily per , because continuing this discussion is an absolute wast of the community's time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:SNOW)

Comment: per high h-index, which gives a clear pass of #C1. An incomprehensible nomination. -- Special:Contributions/101.114.47.159|101.114.47.159
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: with an h-index of 59 obtained by searching for "B J Morris" in Google scholar stunningly passes rof#C1 in a highly cited field. I find this nomination strange
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per #C1. He has many highly cited publications, e.g. (using the numbers from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=author%3Abrian-j-morris Google scholar) citation counts of 436, 332, 289, 276, 238, etc. There is also a plausible case for passing criterion C2 via the Dahl lectureship (I think the other awards are not at a high enough level for this criterion, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Using another reliable source, WoS, I get an h-index of 39 for the query "AUTHOR: (morris bj) Refined by: ORGANIZATIONS-ENHANCED: (UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY) Timespan: All years. Indexes: SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI". He probably wrote some early papers at other institutions where he evidently post-doc'ed at, so those would not be included here. I'll note that the concept of "stunning breakthroughs" is subjective and not at all what is required for keeping. His citations demonstrate that his work has been duly noted by his peers, i.e.  c1, and that is wholly sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)