Deletion of Chris Wells (American football)

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:N trumps . I expect every competent administrator to know this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: I remember I could turn on ESPN in September and count on hearing about Chris Wells and his injury in every single show. The starting running back of a high profile Top 25 team easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment:  does not, nor do any of the other ''additional'' criteria, make  invalid.  The additional criteria are used to determine notability of various classes of subjects that may fail  yet still be notable enough for an article.  That is why the additional criteria are there, not because the athlete in this case needs to meet ''more'' strict criteria, but that if enough coverage under  cannot be found,  can be consulted to see if they still merit an article.  No subject that meets  should be deleted based on notability criteria, regardless of how many additional guidelines the subject fails under
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:N||WP:ATHLETE||WP:N)