Deletion of Colleen Nestler

Comment: Looks like this is a pretty clear case of . The subject is only notable for one event (getting the restraining order), which received a small flurry of publicity in Dec 2005 and Jan 2006.  I did find one other passing mention to it in 2007 in a http://www.forbes.com/2007/07/23/tort-reform-tabarrok-oped-cx_ata_0724tort.html Forbes article on frivolous court cases. So, this wouldn't qualify for an article on the event instead of the person either, per #NEWS. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT)

Comment: the article on the person per , and do not create an article on the event per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT)

Comment: I'd say "rename" at minimum per BLP1E, but the dispute seems so trivial - and of no lasting significance or legal precedent - that I'd prefer deletion.  a tabloid. The incident is so trivial it isn't even mentioned in David Letterman
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)