Deletion of David Gerzof Richard

Comment: Seems to pass our |general notability guidelines. Also, the article is neutral, after I removed some promotional stuff
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I see nothing here that would pass . As for GNG, as claimed above: where are the in-depth reliably published independent sources about Richard? The WSJ one is the only one that looks sufficiently reliable and high-profile (the rest are spammy looking websites and business press release aggregators); I don't have subscription access, but the first paragraph that I can see is not promising (it is about corporate sponsorship of classes in general, not about Richard himself, even if he teaches one of those classes) and even if it were to contain enough in-depth content about Richard, it's only one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)