Deletion of Hamburgevons

Comment: If someone (anyone) had bothered to do a , they would have found many reliable sources in books on typography that describe its use as a test word for font design and layout. Diverse published sources in reliable publications = notability. Seriously, with so many excellent published references out there why are you all advocating deletion?Special:Contributions/198.58.171.47|198.58.171.47
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per 198.58.171.47. Seems like a topic which meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a nonce word for printing tests with no inherent meaning.  At best it will be a .  The only reference I could verify was https://books.google.com/books?id=XQ7mZbRs0j0C&pg=PT317#v=onepage&q&f=false, which aids not at all in determining what the title would/should be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:ONEDAY)