Deletion of Pipeworks Brewing

Comment: it has reliable third-party sources, so is notable. Also suggest following , eg ''If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The article has several citations from reliable sources that are not reviews. It meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The range of sourcing seems to indicate notability issues in relation to .  Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria says: "The source's audience must also be considered. Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary."  Though the ''Chicago Tribune'' is big enough that it also has national and regional circulation, it appears to me that all the sourcing seem to be the ''Tribune'' acting as the local Chicago paper.  Is there evidence of coverage by non-Chicago sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL)

Comment: Normally the way to deal with lesser notable breweries is to redirect them to the town or city where they are based, per  and reweries, however there are seventeen breweries in Chicago, and the Chicago article is crowded. There are sub-articles, such as Economy of Chicago, Culture of Chicago and Food manufacturers of Chicago. There is the potential for someone to create a section on the breweries of Chicago in one of those articles, and information on this brewery could be placed there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL||WP:B)