Deletion of Mohammad Shaikh

Comment: as failing . Most of the sources given are connected with the subject's organization. If easily accessible |reliable source coverage is demonstrated, I am willing to change my position
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: biographical article doesn't apply  and fails . These references in the articles are not reliable enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: It is still an unbalanced praise article, written in jargon that presumes familiarity with various Muslim branches of thought, I would say unencyclopedic and little factual value, though I know this associates with .  Article only cites primary sources influenced or written by the subject himself. Gbooks search http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Mohammad+Shaikh&lr=&sa=N&start=20 is diluted with other individuals with the same name.  Google search indicates that he is inseparable from the institute he created "International Islamic Propagation Center" - e.g. the mention http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_17-5-2005_pg7_48 that he was shot in 2005 merely refers to him as a "cleric" of that institute.  The institute broadcasts TV and could be assumed to pass  in Pakistan, and might pass regular  reqs for mention in the http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldhansrd/text/80703-0001.htm UK parliarment and a single book http://books.google.com/books?q=%22International+Islamic+Propagation+Center%22 on "Cyberworship" (no preview available).  A solution could be to create a stub on International Islamic Propagation Center (currently a redlink) and redirect him there.  I have no interest in the article myself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDL||WP:GNG||WP:N)