Deletion of Stone Trek

Comment: not-notable. A double whammy of flashcruft and trekcruft... and it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Looks like a non-notable web comic. No real syndication, no alexa rank, and no |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I would suggest some people actually read the standards for  - the SciFi.com and G4 references Wazowski linked, along with a http://www.williamshatner.com/Web_Links-req-viewlink-cid-2.phtml plug from William Shatner's official site, easily satisfy condition #1. For condition #3, distribution independent of the creators, I found http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/9541 this and http://www.starland.com/StoneTrek/index.html this for starters - all easily satisfying 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: into Star Trek (Fan made productions)) or '''Delete''' ''without prejudice'' unless notability is asserted in the article.  The site may meet , but the article doesn't at the present time, nor for any revision that I've found this year.  &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: flash cartoon that does not appear to meet the inclusion criteria at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)