Deletion of Film applicator

Comment: No clear justification given for deletion (see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC)

Comment: The testing of films and coatings is notable &mdash; see http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1kk10OIkUNUC&pg=PA323 Basics of Coating Technology, for example.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: The article is short on the balls it needs in the way of .  If the author, or any other concerned party so chooses, we can consider the idea of; ''"For problems that do not require deletion, including duplicate articles, articles needing improvement, pages needing redirects, or POV problems, be bold and fix the problem or tag the article appropriately."''  Well, the article is already tagged, and in the meantime there are roughly another 5 days while we discuss it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES)