Deletion of Peniel Revival Ministries Inc

Comment: Out of those fourteen unique websites, none of them provide any unbiased information. There are no multiple, non-trivial sources. Clearly does not satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Apfaq, you're missing an important point here. We really don't care what online resources this organization has. The point to a Google test is to see who ''else'' might have taken note of it. If virtually no one else has, then the organization really can't be said to meet the ''de facto'' criterion of |notability. Wikipedia is |not a place to promote obscure organizations. The article claims it's been "...recognized by numerous other Christian organizations, denominations, churches and other religious missions as one of the leading Christian Charity organizations committed to reaching to teach...." If that was true, then it would be mentioned in many places, not just a few, and you'd have no lack of independent sources. Instead, of the sources cited for the article, only two of them are not created by either you the organization itself, and they're both letters that don't actually support the statements for which they're cited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SOAP)

Comment: per ; no |reliable, independent sources with significant coverage of the subject are provided proving notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)