Deletion of Eon8

Comment: Quoting verbatim from the lead, Eon8.com is a website "with unknown origins and a slowly-developing purpose and function". Sounds like a fancy way of saying non-notable to me. Fails otability|that, nevermind 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WEB)

Comment: This website is a crystal ball, as a website of predictions. For more information, see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Please see , , and . There is no right to free speech on Wikipedia, and that especially includes non-notable marketing and self-promotion efforts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:NOT||WP:FREE)

Comment: fails  miserably. Notability will be created in the mind of some pseudo-cult that, for whatever reasons, gives the website attention when it merits none, but unless the media covers it thoroughly, then it's thoroughly unencyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: with no special reason to wait until the counter expires.  If it's viral marketing, then Wikipedia is not a billboard for it.  If it's an inside joke propagated by someone with nothing better to do, then it isn't encyclopedic.  If it's a real, honest web site, then the conclusions reached by the article are still |original research.  I don't see any reason to keep this around
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  and the fact that this is a non-notable phenomenon. Vote-stacking of all the above sockpuppets and blockheads saying 'Let's wait and see' is not a valid exercise as (a) this is not a vote and (b) |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - if it isn't notable, it isn't notable. We don't create speculative articles about things that might be notable one day. Given that the website is now not available, this remnant should also be purged. Wikipedia requires more than self-published sources, and the only alternate available references are an array of forum posts. Only 176 unique Ghits for "Eon 8" (mostly unrelated) and 308 unique Ghits for "eon8" (likewise). Big  problems alone merit deletion. Kill it with fire NOW
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT||WP:V)

Comment: Okay, so it's a mysterious website. Whoopee. The idea that we should wait until the countdown reaches zero is ridiculous; as has been noted before, |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; something needs to be worthwhile when the article is written, not in the future. If this is so significant and exciting, let's see it get some media coverage or huge Slashdot buzz or something that signifies that people really give a damn -- otherwise, it's just another website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as not notable. Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball; we can afford to wait until it becomes notable before we have an article about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: it doesn't meet notability requirements (not yet, anyway), as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: the page is just a mess of speculation. Per above, |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not for viral marketing. What happens on July 1? Someone gets either fired for getting no publicity, or paid off for running a successful campaign. Who cares? Not me, and neither do the Wikipedia guidelines. It fails  and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:WEB)