Deletion of Mikael Ljungman (3rd nomination)

Comment: Nothing quite meets  criteria.  Subject was a political candidate, but not elected.  Subject contributed money to some political campaigns.  Subject was involved with a company that was involved in a more famous company.  Subject committed a crime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sufficient sourcing to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sourcing looks good enough for  and , they cover more than one event (so there's no issue with ) and the long-term nature of the coverage of his misdeeds is enough to meet . The special pleading above that we should ignore mainstream national-newspaper level sources because he has attracted political enemies (what politician doesn't?), because the newspapers have a bias (what newspaper doesn't?) or because his misdeeds were too sensational doesn't sway me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:BIO1E||WP:PERP)