Deletion of Hammerax (2nd nomination)

Comment: Thanks for providing links. The topic is the company not any of their products so what we require is |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content. Your https://www.drummercafe.com/music-industry/drum-news/hammerax-liquicy-private-collection-revealed first link to Drummer Cafe contains nothing at all about the company itself and entire article is based on a video posted by the company and includes a comment from the company president. It is churnalism. It fails all of the criteria for establishing notability. Your https://www.musicradar.com/reviews/drums/hammerax-effects-cymbals-634371 second link to Music Radar is a review of one of the company's products and contains nothing about the company itself, failing SIGCOV and CORPDEPTH
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Not surprising, the '''always !vote to Keep''' editors from the Rescue Squad continue to !vote as a group without even trying to address the concerns expressed in the nomination. I'm scratching my head over how  is supposed to help establish the notability of organizations - it is only to address whether an article about an organization should include information on that organization's products. I'd go so far as to say that these editors (the Rescue Squaddies) are emerging as extremely disruptive editors in the AfD process. Just as with any article at AfD, the issue can be quickly resolved by linking to (any) references that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability. Where are the references
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT)