Deletion of Arthur Rubin (4th nomination)

Comment: This is basically the same nonsense that was floated in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid W. Barton|Reid Barton AfD, so I'll give the same argument I gave there. The William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition|Putnam carries a prestige at the ''national'' level far outdistancing other types of recognition at the undergrad level, for which most people outside the world of mathematics have no appreciation. Moreso, Rubin is one of only a handful of people (seven, actually) to have ever attained 4-time-fellow status. Separately, his "Choosability in graphs" paper seems to have >400 citations alone (GS) &ndash; an enormous number for a mathematics paper and arguably enough on its own per the impact clause of  #1. Nom already blocked, AfD a waste of time for this one, etc. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: It doesn't matter that the last major activity was in the 80s, as |notability is not temporary. If other 'more notable' pages have been deleted, it also doesn't matter, per . Rubin has received adequate press coverage, therefore keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:WAX)

Comment: meets , significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes , therefore all the arguments made by the nominator are irrelevant. I also strongly suspect sock- or meat-puppetry here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)