Deletion of John Pattison (RAF officer)

Comment: Thank God for men like him, but Wikipedia is |not a memorial or a directory of everyone who fought in a war. Does not satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails to meet the requirements of , lacks significant coverage (per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: has received enough news coverage to meet : http://www.stuff.co.nz/searchresults?cof=FORID%3A9&cx=006730714154542492986%3Aoh6vl0ybuqy&ie=UTF-8&q=%22John+Pattison%22#1177 stuff, http://www.nzherald.co.nz/john-pattison/search/results.cfm?kw1=%22John%20Pattison%22&kw2=&op=all&searchorder=2&display=10&start=0&thepage=1&st=gsa&mediatype=Any&dates=Any NZ Herald, http://tvnz.co.nz/search/ta_ent_search_news_skin.xhtml?q=%22John+Pattison%22&sort=date%3AD%3AS%3Ad1 TVNZ, http://www.3news.co.nz/Home/gSearchResults/tabid/431/Default.aspx?cx=014519039365600221706%3Aym2itsw8shk&cof=FORID%3A10&ie=UTF-8&q=%22John+Pattison%22&sa=Search#688 TV3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As others have shown he meets the basic criteria of  being the subject of published and reliable secondary source material, and he meets the additional criteria of  having received a notable award or honor. Furthermore, while it may be true that he didn't especially stand out amongst his fellow BoB pilots, this was because many of his colleagues were remarkable also, not because he was unremarkable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ANYBIO)