Deletion of Kunoichi

Comment: We are not a catalog of fictional concepts with no chance of |verifiability.  It can be nothing but |original research because '''it does not exist'''.  Come on guys, I hate to be a , but are we really in the business of being a platform on which fictional concepts are showcased?  No matter how many geekypedia editors like a particular anime/ninja fictional world, it isn't ever going to be within our scope or our policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:DICK)

Comment: Epopt, |please calm down and try help guide the discussion or improve the article rather than talking ill of other peoples' opinions. It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: The article does read like  and is unreferenced but Google = Results 31 - 40 of about 440,000 for "Kunoichi" most of which seem to support the premise of the article.  It already has an unreferenced tag
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: mdash; I see a lot of "|keep because I like it" votes here, but not very many explanations of why this article is not original research. May I suggest a review of "Wikipedia:arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|arguments to avoid in deletion discussions," which many of these entries seem to be quoting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)