Deletion of Chip's Challenge

Comment: There is no way this article doesn't meet . The game's a classic, it's been distributed widely, and I'm certain if having enough articles to support it is your problem then more articles could be dredged up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article has a large amount of independent and significant coverage from reliable sources and satisfies .  This is obvious per a https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Chip's+Challenge%22&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1920&bih=965&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=5sGmT4L7LMmG6QHaovSdBA&ved=0CA4QpwUoBQ Google New Archive search.  In that list of articles, if all the article does is note that the subject recieving significant coverage is "like" Chip's Challenge, to me, that's an indication of notability.  It's apparently so well known that it's a type of gold standard or precursor for similar games.  This concept is present in several inclusion guidelines but as there is no inclusion guideline specifically for video games, I think we're may have to apply common themes in inclusion guidelines.  There article and Wiktionary need cleanup (I commented on the report at |COIN) but that doesn't justify deletion of the article.  There are also several !votes here from |SPAs that should probably be ignored based on their lack of citation or addressing of WP inclusion guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COIN||WP:SPA)

Comment: Wikipedia is not the place to be a source for a topic when things like fame, importance, or popularity do not prompt reliable sources to write about that topic. When you look at the fact that reliable sources that are independent of the subject have not written enough about this topic to maintain a stand alone article and, per the above, this "game was widely distributed," "has an active following," and "is familiar to pretty much anyone who used a computer in the late 80s / early 90s," these make it clear that there isn't enough source material for the article. The comments above have not yet sufficiently rebutted this. Consensus is not determined by counting heads, but by looking at strength of argument, and underlying policy.  is clear in its requirements. Give all the SPAs and that the only person who has brought for reliable source material is the AfD lister requesting deletion (me), it's important that participants comment on reliable sources that address the Chip's Challenge subject directly in detail
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)