Deletion of Dwen Gyimah (2nd nomination)

Comment: A few of the sources are not appropriate for Wikipedia. What is left does not pass |GNG. I agree that this is |TOOSOON
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: To Admin- The article has clearly been improved to a standard where I felt confident enough to move it in the main article space, the fact that this article is being requested to be sAlted by exemplo347 proves my example that he/she has not fully read or viewed the article at all but only nominated it for deletion based on its history, This article is of an actor who is clearly notable and relevant to the public eye and interests, sources are clearly reliable as some of the sources are from the biggest news sources in the UK., as any other wikipedia page, they will be thoroughly updated in due course and when needing to, the fact that these two are the only editors who want this deleted without proper reason confuses me, Exemplo347 please read  to understand wikipedia's standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: The sources available are insufficiently reliable to pass GNG; there is no  or  of coverage for the subject to pass NACTOR. A certain reliance on inherited notability. Ultimately, on the assumption his career continues on the expected trajectory, this is a case of- in another context- TOO SOON
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DEPTH)