Deletion of Densa (3rd nomination)

Comment: I do not see anything in  that says something has to be the only subject of a news story for the coverage to ocount toward satisfying notability. There are also several article where Densa is the primary subject, with Mensa along for the ride. Then there is the book which is only about Densa
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I haven't read the book, but we seem to have quite a number of sources now&mdash;certainly enough to justify this article. The prose of the article is much better than it was for the past two AfDs, as well (I've just done some  editing, and clarified that the organization is fictional). I've been finding more and more that I'm playing devil's advocate rather than arguing a sturdy position, so I'm changing my vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS)

Comment: Have you ever read  and are you familiar with the "fair use" concept when it comes to pasting entire copyrighted works into Wikipedia? That said, even a 2 sentence reference to something in a New York Times article from 1999 can be useful in showing it is not something someone made up in school yesterday, and for a meme, such articles over a period of many years show its endurance as a fictional organization
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)