Deletion of FactorDaily

Comment: The references are very poor, startup style PR and run-of-the-mill business news that don't prove the organisation is notable. The first references to https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/19/ambitious-new-media-startup-factordaily-aims-to-be-indias-wired/ fails . The second one is a passing mention and fails . The third ref is also very poor and doesn't pass /. The references provided above, are news stories that perhaps were  originated by the news outlet, but don't verify it as being notable, in own right. They are merely stories that originated there and were picked up by other news organisation. Anybody could have originated them. All that has been presented so far, is indicative of a very young new outlet, that hasinsufficient coverage to satisfy  or . If there was detailed reference available that passed /, they would have been present, but they're not. It is non-notable at the current time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:SIRS||WP:V||WP:SIRS||WP:NCORP||WP:SIRS||WP:NCORP||WP:SIRS)

Comment: The applicable guideline is  and while references should be reliable sources, meeting only that part of the criteria is not enough to establish notability. References must also meet additional criteria including |in-depth coverage and |Independent Content (facts/opinion/etc generated by the journalist). Not a single reference I can find or that is referenced in the article meets the criteria. Topic fails NCORP/GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)