Deletion of Proportionate Representation

Comment: this article is blatant violation of core Wikipedia policy of |NO ORIGINAL RESEARCH and keeping it on Wikipedia can have costly consequence at the end because of the following reasons: The term is entirely sourced from |one source, the IP user just saw the term and fascinated by it decided to create Wikipedia article on it. Google Scholar, Google news and search and JSTOR reveal no use of the term in the sense meant by the user. Also serch using "find" through PDF version of some constitutions and political science texts, revealed zero use of the term in the sense of this text, and twice use in the sense of Proportional Representation. The consequence of leaving this article is that once it pass here and with passing of time it can be quoted in press and the circular referencing will begin Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia|similar to earlier hoaxes on Wikipedia. There's no evidence that the constitution quoted used the term in this particular sense, and I so much agree with Gpc62 above, the term must be taken as used in normal adjective sense except if there's multiple |Independent to  |prove otherwise, for which currently there's known. I am searching some print docs too, let us have other people's thoughts ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:PRIMARY||WP:IS||WP:V)