Deletion of Carrie Salmon

Comment: non-notable model who fails . A few articles in local newspapers and passing mentions in others are not significant coverage that shows that the wider world has taken any notice of her.  That she has appeared in fashion magazine is pretty much run-of-the-mill for a model
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL)

Comment: Models are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because an indiscriminate directory of models technically verifies that they exist. For a model whose most notability-approaching work was in the 1990s, possible media coverage might not Google very well, so this could potentially be recreated if somebody is able to dig up enough ''archived'' media coverage about her to get her over , but Bakazaka is correct that what they found isn't enough to do that. It takes considerably more media coverage to get a person over the bar if the notability criterion you're shooting for is "passes GNG because media coverage exists" than it does if you're shooting for something on the order of "won a major award for her work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Revised previous vote on the basis of the subject appearing to meet  based on the Montreal Gazette and Times Colonist sources given here, although I cannot verify the sources themselves nor whether they're really significant coverage as I do not have access. I'm not convinced the subject meets , but that's irrelevant if she meets GNG. The material from these sources need to be incorporated into the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMODEL)

Comment: I don't find the sources Rebecca posted enough to meet either  (only a Dior verification, not enough) or  (passing mentions or not   which requires multiple significant coverage in reliable secondary sources in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: To meet , we need reliable verification that she did do shows for the brands named in the article. To meet , we'd need SIGCOV in IRS. I think we would find both, particularly the former, if we had access to offline sources. Online, as well as the 1993 and 1995 sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:GNG)