Deletion of Zeitgeist

Comment: This is a powerful abstract concept.  For example, ''An Introduction to the History of Psychology'' says "''Together, these and other factors create a Zeitgeist, or a spirit of the times, which many historians consider vital to the understanding of any historical development.''".  Such abstract topics are difficult to write upon but our |editing policy is to retain them for development over time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: My knowledge of the concept of "Zeitgeist" is Georg Hegel came up with the term, and then some other guys expanded on the term.  The term was important enough for my college European history professor to devote a part of a lecture to it.  You could have enough information on the history and changing usage of the term to have enough content to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Generally recognized as an important concept. "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Agreed it fails  in current state. No hope of expansion into a full article. struck following Bearian's comment It ''could'' become a full article on the concept of Zeitgeist as used in psychology, but currently it doesn't even hint at that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: per  - of course this can be expanded.  Whole books have been written on the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: got to agree, it is only a dictionary definition here so falls into 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)