Deletion of Litmus7

Comment: The article is referenced to routine listings and best-places-to-work announcements, which are classed as trivial coverage at . My searches are finding no better than routine announcements and listings; in sum, a company going about its business but lacking |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:NCORP)

Comment: Unremarkable company. Claims in the "Recognitions" section are not significant. Sources fail . Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: per my PROD: Fails . Sources fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The updated version of the article has improved references and relevant informative content regarding the entity. The information in the article is more significant than "trivial coverage" as listed in . As for notability, upon a thorough and extensive search I did find a number of entire articles regarding the company and how it is a notable entity in the relevant local and global community
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not the Yellow Pages nor |a platform for promotion. Sources fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTYELLOW||WP:PROMO||WP:NCORP)