Deletion of Simon and the Oaks

Comment: since the nomination the article has been improved (thank you, Tokyogirl79! :-) ) and notability per  is shown. I started looking for other sources, and will try to add more information and sources to the article. It is not trivially easy to find such sources, because although it was very much talked about when it was published in 1985 (http://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/filmrecensioner/simon-och-ekarna/ this review of the film in ''Dagens Nyheter'' refers to the book as "the major bestseller of the 1980s" - possibly an exaggeration, but it was certainly a ''very'' popular book), much of what was written in '85 in the papers is not available online, and since the film had the same title, searches mostly find movie reviews. Such reviews often mention the book, but I will try a bit harder to see if I can't find some reliable sources that discuss the book itself. In the meantime, keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOKS)

Comment: meets  as "3.The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable or significant motion picture," plus its a bestseller, here is a LA Times article on the film that states "the source material is a bestselling novel, in this case one by Marianne Fredricksson that has been translated into 25 languages and sold more than 4 million copies worldwide." - http://articles.latimes.com/2012/oct/18/entertainment/la-et-mn-simon-and-the-oaks-20121019 Review: 'Simon and the Oaks' an emotional wartime journey, also nom needs to remember |Article content does not determine notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:CONTN)