Deletion of DVJ

Comment: because it is not a thing. Kudos to the nominator for hunting this one down and for reading through the mush. Should be deleted per  and , and possibly an attempted  for a device that was new at the time but didn't catch on. Better late than never
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: per JohnFromPinckney, article is full of , and was possibly made by someone trying to jump on a fad
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: largely per nom; article is a vast sea of  mixed with semi-promotional details, although there does appear to be a (i.e., ''one'') book, ''https://books.google.ch/books?id=lzwqBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA207&dq=%22DVJ%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiD3_HZv6PwAhUMwAIHHYgEAhYQ6AEwAHoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=%22DVJ%22%20-wikipedia&f=false How to DVJ: A Digital DJ Masterclass'', indicating that, at one time (2007?), there was a wave the author was hoping to ride. Wave seems to have crashed though as, even in Internet era, nothing else seems to discuss this subject, implying  failure, too. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG)