Deletion of Spaghetti girl

Comment: Clear  that fails . ~&nbsp;|&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:GNG)

Comment: If this article is merged, then the best candidates for merging it are the Situational sexual behavior and the Heteroflexibility articles. Like I indicated https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flyer22&diff=596916347&oldid=596914330#Your_recent_edits:_Herpes_genitalis_and_Timothy_L._Tyler_articles on my talk page, there are many eliable sources out there for the situational sexual behavior topic, though the Situational sexual behavior article needs a lot of work to get it in good shape. I also note the Bi-curious article, but bi-curiosity is more so about romantic and/or sexual curiosity than engaging in sexual activity with the same (or opposite) sex on an occasional basis. And, as noted on the Bi-curious talk page, the Bi-curious article should be merged with the Questioning (sexuality and gender) article. That stated, merging the spaghetti girl topic with any of the first three articles I named in this paragraph can be problematic...per the ynthesis policy. If the sources for the spaghetti girl topic are not using the terms ''situational sexual behavior'' (or ''situational homosexuality''), ''heteroflexibility'' (or ''heteroflexible'') or ''b-icurious'' (or other variations of that term), it can be considered ynthesis to include these concepts in those articles. On a side note, I mentioned https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_LGBT_studies&curid=18813001&diff=597101704&oldid=597101492#Lesbian-identified_male here at  that I think this article is a part of a tudent assignment
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:S||WP:LGBT||WP:S)