Deletion of Privilege of the predecessors

Comment: Surely there is some documentation in English of the South Korean legal system? The concept explained in this article is too remote from the eliable sources that most of us can read. In his explanation above, Gauge00 sounds like he is citing a blog written in the Korean language. Blogs are usually not considered to be reliable sources even when they are written in English. If there were a well-referenced article about this topic on the Korean Wikipedia, that could make a difference. The web sites Daum, Naver and Nate do not sound like what we consider to be reliable sources. A legal handbook published in South Korea could be a better source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: to a more appropriate title, one that is already in use by |reliable sources in English. It looks like, if this is covered by English sources, it would be under a different term, because the title here conveys an idea that's completely different that the concept exposed. Alternatively, if no reliably used English term can be found, then delete. --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)