Deletion of Michael Haley (South Carolina)

Comment: The article passes GNG and needs to pass nothing else. However, Haley also has a few "firsts" and that lends to his notability as well. Btw, I did comment on the talk page of  and then came over here to look at the article. This isn't the first time I've seen a spouse up for AfD and the ones that are kept are like this one: they pass GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)

Comment: I'm going to deal with this article, and this article alone in this response (I'll address the overall concept in {{u|E.M.Gregory}}'s thread on the Inherit talk page. This article clearly meets the level of coverage necessary to meet . If the coverage were simply from local SC sources, I would be more hesitant, but the current references include national attention. The rare status of his military service I think makes him a more attractive subject for reporters. He has even received attention in international news sources such as the http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/nri/us-canada-news/Sikh-priest-gives-his-sword-to-Nikki-Haleys-husband-stirs-row/articleshow/45163269.cms ''India Times'', as well as other national coverage, such as http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2013/1219/Gov.-Nikki-Haley-s-husband-is-home-from-Afghanistan-I-took-my-first-breath-in-a-year ''CS Monitor'', http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/south-carolina-gentleman-returning-afghanistan-article-1.1545556 ''New York Daily News'', and the http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/nikki-haley-husband_n_2450626.html ''Huffington Post
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Prompted by this AFD, I have started a thread on the talk page of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)

Comment: Creator is referencing the fact that other articles they have created have been kept at deletion discussions. That is not a valid reason to keep this article unfortunately. . Only partners and spouses of politicians with significant notability on their own should have individual articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)