Deletion of American Bulldog Registry

Comment: The title is that of a company or organisation which apparently doesn't exist. The content is a list of two such companies of which at least one appears to fail  and should become a redirect – as already noted by {{u|William Harris}}. If the two companies were notable, the function of this page would be better performed by reciprocal See-also links
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: as an obvious #DIRECTORY policy violation. Its own intro says why this is not a valid article approach: "The American Bulldog is registered by many organisations" – the same is true of other breeds, so for {{em|every}} breed we'd have a bogus list article like this, mostly with identical content (i.e., the major breed registries/kennel clubs). It just serves no encyclopedia purpose, any more than would a "List of department stores that carry Vans shoes". Also, my ability to |assume an innocent attempt to create a legit encyclopedia article is stretched to the breaking point, because pretty much all community and administrative drama to arise within the scope of  in about the last year has related directly to promotion of non-notable alleged new breeds and sub-breeds of bulldog (see ongoing AfD of "Olde Boston Bulldogge" and several previous ones), and attempts to suppress or malign well-established breeds (esp. the Pit Bull; see recent ANI about that "NoMoPBs" activist). I can't read minds, but this article appears to exist solely to drive puppy purchases and pedigree registrations.(#PROMO, ). PS: There are also some reparable faults, like the title (should be "List of American Bulldog registries"), and style gaffes, like using British English in an American topic. &nbsp;—&thinsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:AGF||WP:DOGS||WP:NOT||WP:SPAM)