Deletion of Leafpad (2nd nomination)

Comment: non notable, fails  and no significant coverage otherwise. easy delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Pesonal opinions on notability aside, there's nothing in the article that isn't self-evidently |verifiable. If article size (stub-ness) is a legitimate reason to delete articles then go ahead, otherwise I don't see what the problem is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Come ''on''. Blatant failure of , which requires ''significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject.'' None of these sources even ''begin'' to qualify. We have listings in packages and configuration manuals as our "sources." Are we going to have separate articles on ''ll'', ''vims'', and every other entry in the bin directory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: After looking at the sources given and other potential , I am unable to find ''significant'' coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)