Deletion of Tas László Dobos

Comment: The article text looks like a lot of it is machine-translated from hu wikipedia, so there might be a plausible case for  type deletion there.  OTOH, the article apparently refers to several reviews of works (and multiple reviews of multiple works would be a pass of ).  The problem is that the article doesn't actually give a source for the reviews, failing .  I wasn't able to find the reviews listed in the article (or other reviews) in my search; someone who speaks more Hungarian than I do might have more success
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:V)

Comment: per , with no prejudice against recreating with better sourcing.  The most plausible case for notability is through , which would generally require multiple reviews of multiple works.  The article does appear to have some quotations from reviews, but sourcing is extremely unclear, and it is unclear how one would go about verifying.  I suspect that the subject had reviewed works in the pre-internet age, with the reviews appearing perhaps in defunct Hungarian newspapers (for example).  The reviews quotations that are in the article do not look like a clear pass of  even if they could be tracked down; meanwhile, the article is in a sufficiently poor state that I believe we'd be better off starting from scratch if reviews are tracked down later.  I am not particularly influenced by the hu wiki deletion discussion, as notability criteria are surely quite different; I remind participants here that sources do not need to be in English or online (but they do need to be |verifiable).  I will remark that I do speak some Hungarian, though I am far from fluent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:V)