Deletion of Roland De Wolk

Comment: First, '''fresh sources''' have been added to this entry between the time of its nomination and the end of 1 August 2013, and so this article is no longer a BLP without references. Second, the article has also been rewritten to remove any doubt about COI (see above). Taking a look at the references added (over 20 citations), De Wolk is the subject of '''''' over decades, which is one sign that he is not a BLP1E. In addition, he passes several criteria listed under '''''' based on peer regard for his professionalism and significant and multiple awards won, as well as for his early textbook for online journalism. In addition to his individual awards, one source lists De Wolk as one of 16 who were responsible for coverage that secured the newspaper's 1990 Pulitzer, which is the most important journalism award in United States. The other mistake of the nominator, besides the reason for the block (see above), was to tie deletion to recentism. The context about his four decades as a journalist now in the article provides readers with the means to evaluate the most recent incident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: Crosses the threshold of .  Thanks everyone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)