Deletion of Patent Act 2003

Comment: As a significant parliamentary statute of a nation, I think this article meets . I don't think it's really . It relies pretty heavily on the  source of the statute itself; however "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." I don't see any indication of misuse here. the editors so far have been essentially summarizing the contents of the primary source. What I don't see is any real ''interpretation'' of the source. ("Any ''interpretation'' of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation.") As I read it, the editors are on the right side of the line here ("A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge.") If they go over the line that can be corrected by editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:PRIMARY)