Deletion of Suvigya Sharma

Comment: Problem I see that, for example, I didn't find any mention of him in connection with Singapore Art Museum restoration project. Also, I've translated the article you mentioned, and it's the same text, which is copy pasted in other  articles over and over again, which makes the claim of it being promotional stronger. Significant coverage per  has to have multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, which I don't see in all these articles. Working with notable celebrities does not make one a notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: There is no way an American artist would be held to such rigorous standards. Classic case of systemic bias. I urge delete !voters above to perform  and change their !votes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I am astonished by this nomination. Coverage of Sharma has been very significant in the quality and popular press in India and elsewhere. Evidence of meeting  is abundantly clear. Was  performed here? If a cleanup is required do it or tag the article. Don't nominate a worthwhile, well-sourced article for deletion, especially when it raises questions of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:GEOBIAS)