Deletion of Quillan Roberts

Comment: so he got a bit of hype a few years ago when he was heralded as "the next big player" - big whoop, happens all the time, nothing but . He fails  and , is not notable as a player yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Obviously doesn't pass .   References are routine.  ''Optimism remains between the posts for TFC'' is the only one that ''could'' be considered non-routine.  Refs don't pass the "significant coverage" clause of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  as has not played in a |fully professional league. No indication that he has received the level of coverage required by GNG. The "long article" noted above is significantly under 500 words and so would count as a stub on WP! The "outstanding goal" is an obvious example of . I don't see any evidence of significant coverage, in-depth interviews or articles, only 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:BLP1E||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Probably a case of  and so if a user wants to step forward, we could move it to their user space until the subject meets notability guidelines. It shouldn't remain in main space until such time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (:WP:TOOSOON)