Deletion of Pilis problem

Comment: After reading the original article in hu.wikipedia, it appears this might merit a few sentences or a paragraph in a related article (e.g., History of Hungary or Neopaganism in Hungary), but there isn't enough material to justify a separate article. And trusting the nominator's statement that this falls under , this likely fails the |notability requirement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: The subject of the article is in itself a fringe idea. It's true that there are various branches of Neopaganism in Hungary, to which it is related, and which as a set of religious, esoteric, or pseudohistorical beliefs are popular enough to be notable. It's possible to describe and discuss the existence and social significance of these beliefs as such, see this academic paper for example: https://www.academia.edu/7204197/Postmodern_pilgrimages._From_Attila_to_the_Hearth_Chakra From Attila to the Heart Chakra - Postmodern pilgrimages. However, framing it as a "problem" or "dispute" about the actual veracity of the beliefs in established scholarship does not adhere to  and is a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:FALSEBALANCE)