Deletion of Rajkumar Ahir

Comment: It's a one sentence stub.Not a real reason, per {{u|Phil Bridger}}. Let's close this per . &#8213
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: fails both  and , This Indian National Congress politician has never won an election. In 2018 state Assembly he was the runner up https://www.firstpost.com/politics/mandsour-election-results-2018-bjp-leads-in-madhya-pradeshs-mandsour-malhargarh-suwasra-garoth-manasa-neemuch-and-jawad-5709951.html, He was covered in 2013 for the drama and tantrum he threw for getting the election nomination.https://www.firstpost.com/politics/angry-mp-cong-workers-lock-up-meenakshi-natarajan-in-a-room-1218143.html He still lost though. Nothing notable done by the subject yet. So I dont see any reason for keeping this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: fails  and  pretty clearly. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: The question is not whether the subject meets |political notability.  They don't, and that isn't the question.  The question is whether they meet |general notability, and they do not.  Therefore
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: fails .  Unelected nominees have a much higher bar in terms of the required coverage, and this nominee does not meet that bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)