Deletion of Universal life church world headquarters

Comment: Secondly, even if those words did appear, or some other words that you are paraphrasing, you seem not to have realised that  is a section of a page entitled  "Wikipedia:Arguments '''''to avoid''''' in deletion discussions" (my emphasis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: I concur with NatGertler & JamesBWatson but would add (i) One mention in a reliable source does not necessarily establish notability and although external does the Star Advertiser really qualify as a sufficiently knowledgeable source to back notablility (furthermore, which ULC is it refering to?); (ii) The sbwire references seem to be recycled press releases from UCLWHQ itself; (iii) I contacted Dr Ehrman and he replied immediately denying all knowledge of UCLWHQ &ndash; see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/talk:Universal_life_church_world_headquarters#Home_study_course for details and I have deleted the claim from the lead section.  This last makes me feel the article also infringes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: So far in this discussion, I have seen it claimed twice that  says that "An article is not subject to deletion if famous people are listed." But I can't find that quote anywhere in . I would also question why it has been claimed that Bill Clinton was ordained as a minister in this church, because that is not mentioned in this article, nor have I seen it mentioned in any |reliable independent sources yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:INHERITED||WP:RS)

Comment: Fails notability guidelines at . No sign of significant third party coverage. Gnews has 4 relevant hits, all self-generated (do not confuse the Modesto ''Bee'' hit, which is about the ULC, a separate organization). Ghits is a sea of self-generated hits (mainly press releases) and databases - nothing that conveys notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: The only cited sources that would meet Wikipedia's |criteria for reliable sources are http://www.staradvertiser.com/s?action=login&f=y&id=140395493 the newspaper article about civil unions and http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2011/09/20/1648025/retired-judge-staples-found-dead.html the story about the death of Judge Staples.  But neither of those articles is about the Universal Life Church World Headquarters, and neither confirms the accuracy of the majority of the information in the article.  If we remove all the information in the article that isn't in reliable sources, we are left with almost no article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There's a lot of  and/or  going on here, on both sides of the argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT||WP:SOCK)

Comment: Recommend speedy deletion in accordance with G11; subject lacks established notability in accordance with topical notability guidelines for |organizations or the |general notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. While the organization's title indicates that they may have a global presence, no actual reliable or independent sources are provided to support this claim. Additionally, the ordination of individuals that may live in other regions or countries is not indicative of notability based on a national or international scope of activities. Best regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG)