Deletion of Professional wrestling attacks

Comment: the content is legitimate, but so are the concerns with OR and excessive detail.  The "how to" guide concern does not strike me as serious because describing the move is necessary for understanding it.  However, I suspect that most of those here who, as I did, heard about this AfD from WP:PW believe that no major changes are necessary to these articles.  This is not the case.  If there are no secondary sources that describe the way these moves are performed--no books, websites, magazines, etc.--and if no such sources are cited, then there is really no way to say that the articles pass  and .  For now, I'd be in favor of keeping the articles.  However, if verifiability and excessive detail concerns are not addressed within, say, a month, and the vote were to come up again, I'd be inclined to favor deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR)

Comment: The problem with these articles is that they are obvious original research  not possible to have reliable sources as per  they are totally unverifiable . The names are neoligms also  because they can't be sourced back to a specific author but are really just slang terms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NEO)