Deletion of Daisy the Great

Comment: Evaluating the sources one by one: '''1:''' File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px, promotional and a considerable part of it is interview, violating . '''2:''' File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px, just a listing on their label's website, not in-depth coverage and not independent. '''3:''' File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px, Medium.com is |user-generated. '''4:''' Same source as 1. '''5:''' File:Symbol question.svg|16px, leaning File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px. Seems to be a reliable music website and coverage is more than a trivial mention, but not quite , imo. '''6:''' File:Symbol question.svg|16px, leaning File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px. Reliable website but seems to be routine coverage of a video and the author has a connection to the band, which fails . '''7:''' Same source as 2. '''8: '''File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px, it's an interview, fails . '''9:'''File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px Just a promotional listing. '''10:'''File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px, probably  as a blog, also just a promotional listing. Disagree that this source satisfies  #4 as the tour only receives a trivial mention. '''11, 12:'''File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|16px Interviews, fail . '''13:''' Same source as 6
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:UGC||WP:SIGCOV||WP:IS||WP:IS||WP:UGC||WP:BAND||WP:IS)

Comment: Meets the . Probably also 1 and 4 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND)

Comment: Looking through all of the blogs in the sources, I don't think  has been met due to lack of significance or independence (which negates NBAND #1 and #4). The band could be notable soon, though - if there's better sourcing don't hesitate to recreate it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: based on my evaluation of the sources above, sorely lacking in independent sources, perhaps a bit . I did a pseudo- and found nothing that would satisfy notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: doesn’t satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND)

Comment: Needs more |reliable, independent, secondary source coverage than Nylon and R29 for us to write an article on this topic that does it justice without regressing into |original research. No additional hits in my custom search of vetted arts/music/cultural sources. Beyond the |GNG, that there is so much confusion over NBAND #1 and 4 is telling. (not Help:Watchlist|watching, please {{tl|ping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:OR||WP:GNG)