Deletion of Twin Ponds

Comment: It looks to be more of a business entity since it is rented out so  might be a way to look at it, in which case it fails. It is not a permanently populated place, nor would I call it an 'attraction or landmark' so NPLACE does not apply. It does not come close to passing GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: Its desolate location..." isn't an argument for anything. Gwen, I'm sorry, but I don't think we should be rewriting ; I don't see ''anything'' in NPLACE that would apply here. Conversely, there's nothing in the article that suggests this passed the GNG, and I can't find anything through Google that makes this noteworthy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPLACE)

Comment: A mass series of y, ing nominations targeting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:WIKIHOUND)