Deletion of Michael Jenkins (Unification Church) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Even the snippets available at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22unification+church%22+%22Michael+Jenkins%22&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8 Google News show Jenkins' position and role cited by plenty of reliable sources over the years.  Nomination shows no evidence of having attempted to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I've added several independent RS citations to the article--unfortunately, several of them are not freely available on the web, but all are described adequately that any major library should be able to locate them.  I'd appreciate it if the delete !voters could reexamine the article, let me know if it meets  and, if not, what additional demonstration of notability would be needed.  Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: Nomination rationale is largely . I will look at the article again, but I'm still inclined to stick by my keep vote in the first AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)