Deletion of Education of the British Royal Family

Comment: I created the article, but must now reluctantly AfD it. The article is being repeatedly, thoroughly, whitewashed through multiple and repeated blankings https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Education_of_the_British_Royal_Family&diff=716339850&oldid=716338592 of large sections of sourced text, in some cases invoking the argument that "it's her the Queen's 90th birthday" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&diff=716342811&oldid=716342386. The article has attracted a large influx of editors with various userboxes indicating fandom of this celebrity family who appear intent on obliterating sourced content without discussion, even overriding active RfCs in the process. As this situation can't be remedied,  demands the article be deleted; we can't host vanity articles on WP and this article only has the potential to become a vanity article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTIONAL)

Comment: Because I don't think the article has the potential to be anything other than what it is right now. Also, where does it stop? ''Marriages of the British Royal Family'', ''Pregnancies of the British Royal Family'', ''Deaths of the British Royal Family'' – like education these have all been covered at length in reliable sources, but at this point you are merely creating a database of things already mentioned in the royal biographies, which is one of the things Wikipedia is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The topic is clearly notable as there's an entire book about it: ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SRye55LCNFYC Royal Education: Past, Present, and Future''.  The poor quality of the first draft is not a reason to delete per our |editing policy.  As the nominator created the article, the nomination seems to be a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:POINT)