Deletion of Anna Klingmann

Comment: meets , article reflects this, thanks to {{u|Megalibrarygirl
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , now clearly demonstrates a pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Although https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?cites=6318180277203752691&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en her book is reasonably highly cited, her academic career appears to consist of a series of short-term teaching posts and she fails , and there's no indication that she meets the GNG as an architect. If you removed the unsourced and promotional claims then there would quite literally be nothing left
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: thanks to good work from Megalibrarygirl. They look like RSs to me. I do note that I can't access some due to subscription requirements. Many of the sources I can access are in-depth enough to make this person meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is a lack of independent reliable secondary sources, as required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: in the current improved state, the article clearly satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)