Deletion of List of prisoners of war

Comment: per  as informational and navigational list, complementary to :Category:Prisoners of war per . The nom seems unfamiliar with the fact that we routinely limit lists of people (and other things) only to those entries that have articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN)

Comment: any list has the potential for lots of cruft, but the fact that it's notable POW's limits who can appear on the list.  However, anyone on the list without a WP article should be removed. The lack of references, as per  is not an issue, since the underlying concept, POW's, is clearly notable. LISTN also states, "Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: WP:SKCRIT no policy based reason for nominating. This is clearly a list of notable POWs which is not indiscriminate and provides information for the readers per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)