Deletion of Merck headquarters

Comment: My real life identity is known to many and they know I have never been employed or otherwise worked for Merck.  The article is sourced to |reliable sources, including http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE7D6133FF931A15751C1A967958260 New York Times 1, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CEFDD153EF936A25752C1A964958260 New York Times 2,  http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9401E2DB163CF932A15752C1A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1 New York Times 3, http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS181347+14-Aug-2008+PRN20080814 Reuters, none of which are Merck and all of which are directly about the building (ie. non-trivial mentions).  I cannot see any pro-Merck language in the article, but would be open to suggestions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)