Deletion of StereoKiller

Comment: Advertisement. Alexa rank of 282,210. A grand total of ''Seventy-one'' unique Google hits. Non-notable. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: and semi-protect this discussion please. This article fails , and in kind . It reads like and Advert as well.  It may be a ANITY article as well as Cbrickhouse is seemingly claiming ownership of the site.  I would remind Cbrickhouse that Blogs, Personal Websites and other trivial sources are not acceptable for citing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:VANITY)

Comment: These still do not pass  or  criteria.  And comments made like http://www.stereokiller.com/boards/topic.cfm?topic_id=184162&forum_id=2&Topic_Title=everyone%3A%20help%20me%20with%20this%20shit&forum_title=General%20Crabbery&M=0&s=1 this on that websites discussion boards asking users there to come here and make accounts to contest this, show that you are trying to disrupt this AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: I wouldn't say that however, if they can prove they have been covered by  and edit the article to show this (a few features in newspapers, magazines, tv shows or other published reputable sources would prove it is notable) then the article just needs a clean up, however in light of the statement above, the article was created in bad-faith so I would be neutral on keeping it even if they found sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Before I go into my reasoning for deletion, let me say this: saying incivil and rude things ("your math/reasoning skills are not very good", "completely retarded", etc) will ''not'' help your case in the least and may in fact result in a block or ban.  I believe this article should be deleted because it does not satisfy the guideline of  and because it's apparently not very well known - I can find no news article or non-trivial publications on this website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: If the service is as popular as it and it's supporters claim, then I will change my position only after the article contains |citations to |reliable sources that allow it satisfy the criteria put forth in Wikipedia's |guidelines for inclusion of websites. The article must also not sound like an |advertisement and must be |neutral
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:SPAM||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Non notable web site. Does not meet . Reads as advertizing. No assertion of notability within the article. No sources to support verification of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Please read  and  to see our reasoning for deleting your article.  If other articles seem to fail to qualify for articles under the same criteria yours may be deleted for, please feel free to list them for deletion following the instructions on 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT||WP:AFD)