Deletion of A Scooter for Yaksmas

Comment: per nom., #PLOT and elevision episodes. As regards Star Trek Enterprise, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:T||WP:WAX)

Comment: and hats off for th nom for this '''bold''' editing initiative. All these articles fail , #PLOT,  nor do they have any |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability under  or . They read like TV guide summaries, and fall outside the scope of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:WAF||WP:RS||WP:FILM||WP:FICT)

Comment: as failing , ,  and OT#PLOT the list already has the necessary summaries, episode numbers, and airdates so nothing to merge.  Redirects unneeded as no GFDL info is being merged from one to the other
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE||WP:FICT||WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: deleting these articles would be contrary to , which would mandate the articles being redirected back to the parent article - List of episodes of The Ren and Stimpy Show. As to the question of whether reliable sources can be found for these shows, a quick google search reveals that the New York Times has a number of reviews from the first run of the show which could be used http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE7DB1130F935A2575BC0A964958260, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE4DA143CF931A25750C0A964958260, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE1DC133CF932A15752C1A965958260 which mention Emmy award nominations and ratings "astonishing for Nickelodeon". The book ''Nickelodeon Nation'' (ISBN 0814736513, New York University Press) has a chapter on Ren and Stimpy which "provides a fascinating look at the wide commercial and audience success of a controversial show that perhaps ought to have been marketed to adults rather than children." http://www.ybp.com/acad/reviews/0205_nickelodeon.html and academic Mark Langer's "Animatophilia, Cultural Production and Corporate Interests" is a "serious study of Ren and Stimpy". (Animation World Magazine - issue 3.7 - October 1998). Finally the DVD releases includes commentary and introductions from creator John Kricfalusi and have also caused a number of reviews to be published that analyse individual episodes. http://www.popmatters.com/pm/tv/reviews/ren-stimpy-the-lost-episodes. There are many ways for editors to start improving these articles, deletion should only be considered after other searches have proved fruitless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE)

Comment: Per , nn episodes should be redirected, but leaving this on wikipedia is in some cases like leaving a copyright violation easily accessible, and I see little point in wikipedia hosting them. If someone really wants to transwiki, allow it per request. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE)