Deletion of Groundswell group (2nd nomination)

Comment: organization has received |significant coverage http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/07/26/critics-call-gop-groundswell-group-report-faux-outrage in ''U.S. News & World Report'', http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/facing-groundswell in ''MSNBC'', http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/07/groundswells-journalists-169212.html in ''Politico'', http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/07/25/in_defense_of_groundswell_the_secret_conservative_messaging_group.html in ''Slate (magazine)|Slate'', http://www.businessinsider.com/groundswell-grover-norquist-hater-club-2013-7 in ''Business Insider'', http://theweek.com/articles/461705/groundswell-rightwing-journolist in ''The Week'', etc. Therefore, having received significant coverage in multiple non-primary reliable sources subject passes  & 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:ORG)

Comment: The problem is all of the coverage, including all of those links above, are in response to a single publication by http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/07/groundswell-rightwing-group-ginni-thomas Mother Jones and all published within the the span of a few days.  requires coverage over time. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per the significant coverage in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources found by {{user|RightCowLeftCoast}}. Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline is met, and Wikipedia:Notability#Notability is not temporary applies. I also agree with RightCowLeftCoast that  (which redirects to Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Duration of coverage) is inapplicable because the article is about an organization, not an event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)