Deletion of NATO involvement in the Yemeni Civil War

Comment: The essential problem we have is that people have written a ton of content about UK and US involvement in the Yemeni Civil War. The content isn't exactly perfect either, but its got decent sources behind it so I don't think it rises to  levels. We can't put it back in the (already lengthy) main article, the level of detail would be seriously . Calling it ''NATO involvement'' was outright wrong. Now its been renamed ''Foreign involvement'', which is at least a notable topic. There's still a bunch of NPOV, UNDUE and scope problems (what do we do about Saudi Arabia's involvement?) and I don't believe this is the right solution. However the article has had its current scope for >2 days. '''No prejudice to renomination''' if it doesn't improve
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: The nomination has not mentioned any policy-based rationale for deletion. Subject meets  and content issues should be resolved on talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)