Deletion of Monkey testing vs gorilla testing

Comment: poorly sourced neologism article with significant  content. Monkey testing has a referenced article, and RS coverage. 'Gorilla testing' has a few mentions in books (https://books.google.com/books?id=NFXZ4yKY0L0C&pg=PA452&lpg=PA452&dq=%22gorilla+testing%22+software&source=bl&ots=eAaGT3_hKd&sig=YA5C4e9RK2gx87By4FaSbdjl42g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjz38HB17zRAhVCs1QKHV0LA-c4FBDoAQgiMAI#v=onepage&q=%22gorilla%20testing%22%20software&f=false 1https://books.google.com/books?id=Ee8D8pUlJvUC&pg=PA157&lpg=PA157&dq=%22gorilla+testing%22+software&source=bl&ots=jqzuqIk1TG&sig=Lft4qB9rse9Qn8ubk8HU37HOUTM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjz38HB17zRAhVCs1QKHV0LA-c4FBDoAQgZMAA#v=onepage&q=%22gorilla%20testing%22%20software&f=false 2https://books.google.com/books?id=B4sQDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=%22gorilla+testing%22+software&source=bl&ots=NMvbN60Uz1&sig=_CQEd1b-rhtBYVV9KkZ-HCpDz64&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi54IKL2LzRAhULsVQKHdNoDAU4HhDoAQg-MAk#v=onepage&q=%22gorilla%20testing%22%20software&f=false 3) and numerous hits for low quality blogs, Q/A sites, and forums. Overall, it looks like Gorilla Testing is borderline in coverage for having its own article, but there is definitely not enough RS coverage comparing the two systems for a comparison article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)