Deletion of James D. Marks (2nd nomination)

Comment: Discounting the obvious non-notability generating sources (the patents, profile pages, etc), what's left are a bunch of press releases, and some coverage from the school paper of the high school that he attended, and then spoke at once.  The sources are also a bit misleading, as it seems that in at least one case, the same press release is being used as two separate sources as they were published on multiple sites, to bloat the reflist.  Note that there is another James D. Marks, a M.D. Ph.D., who appears to be considerably ''more'' notable than this individual, and pretty much all actual results in reliable sources are actually on the doctor.  There were some arguments in the prior AFD that the website he founded and ran until its sale is notable, and thus this individual is as well.  However, not only does this run counter to , but I'm not finding a whole lot of evidence that the website would pass the  itself, anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)