Deletion of Enigma software group

Comment: Our company is relevant if you refer to  you will see the first criteria for corporations is that the company should be "the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself" that is the case with our company as we have been written up multiple times by leading publications there is even a link to a full page article in PC Magazine on this page.  Additionally this is a publicly traded company with investors listed on the Nasdaq OTCBB I don't see why there should even be a debate at all on this see the third criteria on . (Disclosure: I am this article's primary author.  I have a vested interest in this article being published because it is about our company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CORP)

Comment: Seven employees, traded on OTCBB, and only one obscure product.  That article, SpyHunter, should also be deleted per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The article is quite well written, but it seems to be Wikipedia:Vanity|vanity - I say this because Enigmasoftwaregroup is obviously a part of the company... I'm not too familiar with  but having looked at Spyhunter it looks like an advert. If the article is changed so it is written more |NPOV, and also Spyhunter   which seems to be the company product then I'll say keep. Also the name needs to be changed to Enigma Software Group. If not, I'm sorry it'll have to be '''delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:NPOV)