Deletion of Abongo Obama

Comment: Notability |is not inherited. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: no claim to be notable. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There is not enough coverage in sources to make him notable per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Being the brother of a famous politician does not satisfy our |notability requirements. Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|S
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: The '''Basic Criteria''' of  says "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published3 secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,4 and independent of the subject."  Here is your secondary source material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There is nothing in this article that demonstrates ''any'' notability, certainly not independent notability.  I agree with Newross that a mention  in Barack Obama Sr. of this half-brother whom Obama Jr did not even know until adulthood, and who has not been shown to have some significance beyond a genetic link, is more than enough.  This appears to be a |coatrack upon which to suggest an Obama connection to Islam for political purposes. See my response above to the incorrect point about Billy Carter for how Carter differs from Abongo.  And the comments from Utahredrock here are bordering on incivility - no one is  suppressing anything, and a characterization of this delete action as "suppression" is offensive as well as incorrect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)