Deletion of Kumkum Bhagya - Sawan Mahotsav

Comment: While I condemn the method of nomination, I would like to evoke "wikipedia is not a bureaucracy"; having said that, I would recommend taking a look at the subject's notability rather than discussing the nomination.I didnt know about the show. When I read the article, I thought it was some sort of reality show, covering the cast of the original show. An internet search revealed it is a crossover. The subject didnt receive significant coverage '''''in''''' |reliable sources. Most of the coverage is from telly-sites. They try cover to cover everything and anything related to television. To establish notability,  is also required; the subject fails this as well. The ToI source being discussed, was published before the show was released. I couldnt find any RS covering the show ''after'' it was released. It didn't receive reviews from well-known critics, nor any awards. Basically it is |just another show. Overall, the subject doesnt pass . —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:MILL||WP:GNG)

Comment: 1. " The nominator ... fails to advance any argument for deletion or redirection". An article that has a reference from ''The Times of India'' is clearly not  or any other form of Nonsense, so no policy-based argument for deletion has been advanced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:COBBLERS)

Comment: fails . Only two sources are reliable; the ToI and DNA source. The ToI source however is just a photo gallery leaving the DNA source the only one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)