Deletion of Israel at the FIBA Basketball World Cup

Comment: Initially I thought that these articles would be notable in tournaments Israel actually qualified for (like the Brazil ones Galatz mentioned.) However, after looking at the above AfDs, I don't think those are notable either. The Brazil ones should be deleted as well, and I have no objection to nominating them.  is not a reason to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Merge editions''' This information is better gathered at "nation at competition" level. The study of individual countries at major international sporting events (such as world and major continental championships) is a key part of any nation's sporting history (the performance at individual editions, ultimately less so). The per edition information should be merged into the main "Israel at X" articles. Also note that  is entirely non-relevant to this discussion as the statistics gathered are very discriminate and are contextualised. Of much more relevance is the first sentence from Wikipedia:Five pillars: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." This type of information very clearly resembles that of sporting almanacs and is thus relevant to our community's scope
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: per . Proliferation of sports statistics cruft that's best left to dedicated databases. Alternatively, merge - but keep in mind that Wikipedia is not stats database
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: clear  violations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: I voiced my Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey/Archive66#Israel_at_the_IIHF_World_Championship|objection to the hockey articles previously, not sure about including all of these sports together though.  If you look at  the clear direction is to expand the existing articles first and then evaluate whether an independent article is warranted.  This was not done, the information was mostly just duplicated, and not even correctly.  So the question is, (to me anyway) whether the existing pages would be improved upon if left up.  Even after pointing out the errors to the creator, some of the mistakes were not remedied. I find it unlikely in retrospect that they ever will be unless I do it myself so I would prefer them to be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)