Deletion of Marco Allen Chapman

Comment: We have a high standard of inclusion at  and this perpetrator doesn't reach it, nor does the crime he was convicted of. There was some local coverage of the trial, crime, and execution, and even a little national coverage from USA Today. But truly notable criminals get TV shows about them, or books written about them (actual books, not four pages in a book about lots of criminals), or saturation national coverage at some points in their arrest and trial. That was not the case with this guy. In any case, if the article is kept, it needs to be trimmed by at least 50%. All that minute-by-minute detail about his execution: delete. All those one-sentence-paragraphs detailing every step of the appears process: trim drastically. And for heaven's sake, include the reason for the one thing you are claiming he was notable for: WHY was he the last person executed in Kentucky
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: passes , being covered in detail in works such as http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PUW2u8nRcyIC&pg=PA262 this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: There are plenty of sources for the article to pass . I did a search on HighBeam and had 67 hits, most of the were AP articles and a couple of Washington Post articles and various other newspapers.  He only has to meet one of two criteria in  and he appears to meet both
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PERPETRATOR)