Deletion of ShortScience.org

Comment: This could well be a worthwhile project, but at best, it's |too soon for there to be a Wikipedia article about the site. Such few sources that exist are some combination of |primary/|self-published or |unreliable (e.g., an arXiv preprint that hasn't been peer-reviewed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SPS||WP:RS)

Comment: per XOR. The ICML paper is the only really strong source, but it's written by the site's founders. Then we have a preprint, a podcast, and a GitHub repo. The "TechLeer" blog post is verging on , but it seems like that site may be in the neighbourhood of user-generated content (per their https://www.techleer.com/aboutus/ about page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)