Deletion of Elizabeth Kronk Warner

Comment: per Washington Post source mentioned above, and numerous sources in the article that prove she meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: GS h-index of somewhere around 7 does not pass rof#C1. Can notability be found in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: The case for #C1 is weak, as Xxanthippe notes, but she is clearly a recognized expert on native American law (e.g. quoted in Washington Post), and has a plausible case for #C7 for her judicial work and #C8 for being editor-in-chief of the magazine of the Federal Bar Association (as well as serving on the bar's board of directors). Also, her edited volume has been well reviewed; that wouldn't be enough by itself but I think it adds to the overall case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)