Deletion of Timeline of the Bible

Comment: This article is very clearly |original research, with inadequate citation of scholarship on the subject, and not sufficiently well-written. I don't think Wikipedia is the place to vanity-publish this.  The article is also much too long, and there are existing articles for most sub-topics, such as individual books, Chronology of the Bible, and Gospel harmony.  The author should be encouraged to make better-written, properly referenced, non-original-research contributions to those
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:PLOT, , . The article looks almost entirely... ''unencyclopedic''. It contains numerous disjointed quotes from the Bible and no actual, factual chronology or reliable secondary sources to speak of. A seemingly unnecessary |fork from Chronology of the Bible, Chronology of Jesus and other similar pages, I feel that it would have to be fundamentally rewritten to become suitable for an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:INUNIVERSE||WP:CFORK)

Comment: to 'outline of the bible'. I am the author of the article. The article is an 'outline' of the bible arranged as much as possible according to its internal timeline and containing as many links as possible to articles where the material can be discussed in detail and therefore secondarily acts as a convenient list of links. It does not address the question of actual historical dating (or whether the persons or events even existed). As I said on the talk page, Its purpose is to answer the question of  'what does the bible say'. Nothing more and nothing less. (I made this clear from the very beginning. The first 2 words of the article are a link to the talk page explaining this). I deliberately chose to do this so as to avoid accusations of original research and because that is the logical place to start any intelligent discussion about the bible. To say that it treats fictional characters as real () is simply flabbergasting. It contains many links to pages that discuss real historical dates and events many of which are highly critical of the bible and I welcome any such input.  Every number in it was pulled straight from the bible. It is intended for those who are studying the bible and especially those studying its timeline
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:INUNIVERSE)