Deletion of Kimberly Klacik

Comment: I would have nominated this myself if I'd seen it moved to mainspace. She isn't notable, the soundbytes in various unreliable sources are meaningless and she woefully fails . Unless of course, in the extremely unlikely event she beats Kweisi Mfume, she fails all our criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: subject fails  and , and the article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:NPOV)

Comment: There is enough independent coverage here as i'm aware - which means this article passes . This is not as the same as Claudia Conway (as it was driven by '''tabloid coverage''' instead
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: significant coverage in reliable sources, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As pre-election candidate bios go, this one does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not meeting , if the subject wins an election, then reconsider creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Many things are wrong with this article, quality-wise. But I think for now it’s simply |too soon. Let’s call a spade a spade: she isn’t a notable businessperson by Wikipedia standards; she didn’t win the special election to fill Rep. Cummings seat, and she’s not notable as a strategist. For that reason, I say '''delete''' for now. Being controversial itself doesn’t warrant an article with nothing to write on
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Maryland as an appropriate and usual outcome per . There is no indication that the subject passes . No prejudice against recreation if the subject wins in November
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:NPOL)