Deletion of Maxim Jakubowski

Comment: You know,  is a thing, as is , neither of which is much in evidence here. It is a moment's work to discover that, for example, the Crime Writers' Association is a highly notable national writers organization, or that Jakubowski's books are regularly reviewed, some rather widely reviewed, or that he has a relatively lengthy entry in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, or that the positions he holds in various literary associations demonstrate his stature and the esteem he is held in in various fields. The article is less than adequate, but the comments here are remarkably poorly informed and thoroughly nonconstructive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:COMPETENCE)

Comment: He easily meets #3, "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a ... collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." There are reviews of his work dating from 1980 in UK, US, Canadian and Australian newspapers like the ''Atlanta Constitution'', ''The Age'', ''The Los Angeles Times'', ''The Ottawa Citizen'', ''The Guardian'', ''The Daily Telegraph'', ''Financial Times'', etc, etc, plus journals like ''Journal of Social History'' and ''The Times Literary Supplement''. There are articles about him and his bookshop in ''The Daily Telegraph'' and ''The Times''. They could easily be added to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: The subject easily meets . Google has some news coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)