Deletion of List of demon lords in Dungeons & Dragons

Comment: insufficient  to demonstrate it passes the GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Almost entirely comprised of plot information, and sourced only to primary material.  The vast majority of the individuals here are not remotely notable (a number of these are specified as only having been mentioned once in a list in a single book), and the topic fails .  It is also completely duplicative of Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons), though as mentioned in the nom, that article pretty much has the exact same issues this one does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Primarily referenced by  sources. Trivial, in-universe material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: per , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: List cruft with excessive trival plot infomation. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: As listcruft that fails . No apparent need to redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: this is excessive fancruft. As pointed out by Rorshacma, the topic fails . The presentation also falls foul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTDIR)