Deletion of List of keyboardists

Comment: because |categories and lists are complementary, not redundant. The list should probably be split, but it is not currently so long that it needs to be, and there is no evidence that even completing this list to include ''all '''notable''''' keyboardists would make this list unmaintainable. Even if this list were too broad, the |list guideline suggests to split, not delete. This is not why Wikipedia has categories; categories cannot include useful information like what bands the keyboardist played in. Due to MediaWiki's lack of decent category tools or category annotation mechanisms, the :Category:Keyboardists is wholly unweidly; to get the same information that is in this list, I'd have to go down three subcategories just to find :Category:American rock keyboardists, for example, and then to click on every single article to find the bands they played in. While some people may find categories adequate, the only real use I've found for them is to help ensure that corresponding lists are up-to-date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:LIST)

Comment: It serves its purpose as a quick access point for, err people interested in keyboard players. It is useful, well moderated and has a place in WP. Whereas spurious list haters who use  as a self-perpetuating argument does not. What happens after decimating all the List of... pages, a full onslaught of the lists of categories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: not meaning a  argument ... but ...your saying that List of keyboardists|keyboardists are less notable than List of guitarists|guitarists & List of drummers|drummers. I dont understand how from your Nom. Statement. It takes all of them to make the music
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)