Deletion of David Eppstein (2nd nomination)

Comment: Preposterous, |pointy nomination, doomed to failure from the outset
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per . And a '''Note to closing admin''' - please move this to the correct page title Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Eppstein (2nd nomination) before closing. -SpacemanSpiff
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: The creator of this malformatted and incorrectly-linked AfD, {{user|BirminghamAV}}, apparently intended this article to refer to the article about me, David Eppstein (note the spelling). This would be the second AfD on that article; the first is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Eppstein. No comment on the merits of the present discussion except that it seems to be related to the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Tye: BirminghamAV is one of two |single-purpose accounts arguing for a keep there, and mine was one of several delete !votes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: While thanking the nominator for providing some comic relief, the references on the subject page (and its talk page) are ''more'' than adequate to establish the |notability of the subject per . Reading the comments of the nominator above, and reviewing Special:Contributions/BirminghamAV, it is apparent that the nominator misunderstands Wikipedia's procedures. While this pointless discussion should be closed now, I thought I should comment as if it were a good faith nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROF)