Deletion of Religious communism

Comment: I re-wrote the article per , I cleaned up the / issues, and I added a bunch of inline citations to reliable sources that discuss this topic. I urge the editors that have voted for deletion/merging/redirection to take another look at the new version of the article (pinging {{u|JzG}}, {{u|Atsme}}, {{u|Graham11}}, {{u|Montanabw}}, and {{u|Unscintillating}}). Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Clearly notable topic, reliable references |exist, and the article is far, far from unsalvageable.  Send to cleanup if you must, but by no means delete.  I also oppose merging, as it seems to me that the topic is sufficiently notable for its own article. Religious communism is widely discussed as different from other forms of communism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Per our |editing policy, the current state of the topic is not a reason to delete; rather it is a reason to improve the page.  The ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=PMSTAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA800 Encyclopedia of Protestantism'' quite clearly states that "Two forms of communism may be distinguished: religious communism and political communism..."  Relevant sources include ''The theological basis of digger Communism''; ''Amana: A Study of Religious Communism''; ''The early Shakers: an experiment in religious communism''; ''Communal utopias and the American experience: religious communities, 1732-2000'', &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)