Deletion of IPhone (Linksys)

Comment: Even if they didn't have notability before Apple's iPhone rumors, they ''gained'' notability because of it. At this point, the Cisco lawsuit over the name has ''increased'' the subject's notability, and that is easily verified. Per , I'd say this one should be closed by an admin
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Appears to satisfy otability and I liked being able to see in WP what this thing is and its history, which helped me to understand the controversy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The fact that the Cisco/Linksys iPhone product exists is more than enough reason to have an article on it. |Wikipedia is not paper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: very much notable. While we are throwing about initialism, I think this qualifies for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: notable means written about in nontrivial ways in reliable sources, not important or major.  It might not be the massive fame that apple's getting, but this definitely meets #Criteria_for_products_and_services|the standards for products.  I wish I could reach through the internet to shove the actual guidelines in people's face when they abuse the term "non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: it does satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)