Deletion of Bix (website)

Comment: Meets  per a review of |available sources. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. The article does not have a particularly promotional tone, the site was discontinued in 2009, and the article simply presents facts, although it would benefit from some |copy editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEBCRIT||WP:NEXIST||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: This is not independently notable enough to have its own page. Any information to be merged can be taken out from the article history. https://books.google.com/books?id=ugYSRiInQL0C&pg=PA339&dq=%22Bix%22+yahoo!&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjRg6vXy5jPAhVUzGMKHZEaA48Q6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q=%22Bix%22%20yahoo!&f=false This ''Automata, Languages and Programming'' reference for example is not an independent sources as it is written by a Yahoo employee. Techcrunch publishes literally every small news (where the sources are of questionable independence) and even they seem to acknowledge that the site didn't have a lot of significance. Most coverage is solely about the acquisition by Yahoo and subsequent shutdown. Per  there is no need to have a separate page for this
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: per Cunard's demonstration that this was a notable website for a time, and there's too much content to fit neatly in the list article, so a separate page is justfied per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)