Deletion of James Burn (politician)

Comment: Neither borough councillors nor non-winning mayoral candidates are deemed to pass  for those facts per se — but the depth and breadth of sourcing here is ''not'' enough to get him over  in lieu. Of the seven sources here, three are |primary sources that cannot assist notability at all, leaving us with just four pieces of |reliable source media coverage — but campaign coverage falls under , because everybody who was ever a candidate in any election anywhere could ''always'' show that much coverage. To earn a Wikipedia article, people at this level of significance have to be shown as significantly ''more'' notable than the norm for this level of significance — but nothing here shows that at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Non notable local politician, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: WP:POLOUTCOMES|we Wikipedians have decided that local politicians such as borough councilors are just not notable. I |do not see that consensus changing anytime soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: He's '''not the Mayor'''. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLOUTCOMES)