Deletion of Adib Shishakly (activist)

Comment: per nomination. There is clear |citation overkill here (e.g. for one piece of information, there are fourteen links!) but analysis show up their worth. First, we have lots of YouTube videos although that website is |not acceptable in establishing notability. Then, there are reports in acceptable indeed sources, such as ''Reuters'' (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-opposition/divided-syrian-opposition-to-choose-new-leader-idUSBRE84N05F20120524 here), the ''The Hindu'' (https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/arab-spring-the-season-has-turned/article3675361.ece here),  or ''Al Jazeera'' (https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/10/201110416219838871.html here), but they mention the subject only once or in passing, their focus being on the Syrian opposition generally or on other persons. The Bloomberg News|Bloomberg link seems Dead link|dead. And then we have a conglomeration of |puffed up texts in Arab language media of dubious merit. Nothing much
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:OVERKILL||WP:YTREF||WP:PUFFERY)