Deletion of Fran Hauser

Comment: Nothing particularly notable about the person - what there is I don't think rises past . Perhaps her career will continue and she'll become notable, but |not right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: WP:NOT#SOAP|WP is not a soapbox for Time Inc's corporate communications department. I agree that none of the sources back up her notability - she isn't even mentioned in the vast majority. The principal contributor has worked nearly exclusively on this article, plus a few edits of another Time Inc executive, so it's arguably 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: after checking all sources I agree that there is not |significant coverage, since the mentions of Hauser are trivial (and, as has been stated, several of them do not mention Hauser at all - although there has been some pruning of irrelevant sources since the article was first nominated, I think
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: fails , sources do not demonstrate notability. Note to agringaus: there is no need to comment on every "delete", make your point once and leave it at that. Repeating your comments ''ad nauseam'' does not help your case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)