Deletion of Baidu 10 Mythical Creatures

Comment: Having gone through the references (I do not speak Chinese so my view may be flawed), I can come to the following summary: 1) the article is about a hoax, however Wikipedia does have articles about notable hoaxes, see #Hoaxes vs. articles about hoaxes. 2) while many if not most of the sources are self published , i.e. youtube, open wikis, (the Chinese wiki Baidu Baike), blogs (PhoenixTV)...etc, some of these sources may pass  (but not all). 3) Several of the references do give credible notability, e.g. The New York Times. 4) My concern is that the self published references outbalance the notable references (see ''5. the article is not based primarily on such sources'' at ); and there are few English references, (see ). However, to many self published sources and not enough English sources is not, in my view, reason to delete. The article needs a good clean up, not deletion. Article can claim to have notability, accordingly - keep. Yours ever
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:NOHOAXES||WP:SPS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:SELFPUB||WP:NONENG)