Deletion of YouthQuake Live

Comment: The current version has zero references.  The sources located by John M Wolfson don't impress me as being .  Had I found the article in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=YouthQuake_Live&oldid=572489588 this state from six years ago, I would have 'd it.  Since that time, it got cleaned of the promotional stuff, but there's really nothing left.  No objection to somebody starting from scratch in draft space, assuming they can find solid references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:G11)

Comment: per , "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable...merely because it exists", "No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is" - fails  as it has not "been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources" - interviews are not reliable sources - therefore, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGSIG||WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: I could find http://boldcityvoice.com/influence-young-people-youthquake-live-accomplishes-jax/ this from a GSearch; all of the Jacksonville.com sources are dead links but appear to establish notability when viewed through the Internet Archive. (http://web.archive.org/web/20110812112957/http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/101101/met_7522916.html, http://web.archive.org/web/20110812113038/http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/031302/dsr_8854371.html, and http://web.archive.org/web/20150215193832/http://jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/111697/b1youthq.html) Those all three count as one source since they're from the same website, but it, BoldCityVoice, and News4Jax seem to be independent from both YouthQuake and one another. It's not much, but |barely notable is still notable.  &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:IFINDOUBTCREATE)