Deletion of Inglesina Baby

Comment: a cursory googling returns in excess of 250,000 hits. Notability is asserted if not backed up. The article needs some work but "reads like an advertisement" is over-egging the pudding just a bit. Perhaps  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: Not enough coverage from 3rd party - independent sources.  I was only able to find 1 news story on Google News as shown here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Inglesina+Baby%22+company&scoring=a and that one reference was only in passing.  Sorry, without establishing |notability, article should be deleted. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: as I agree with the nominator, this article talks big but provides no |verifable evidence of notability, and |news stories on their own don't provide this. It clearly fails , as the sources cited are used to promote the companyon their own's products, rather than to establish notability of the company itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:SBST||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as plain |advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)