Deletion of Ben Eisenkop

Comment: Does not pass rof. Can he pass  as a blogger? My view is no
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: but only just. He may not pass some of the more well-defined guidelines, but remember, they're just that: guidelines. He has had enough mainstream media coverage to definitely justify the noteworthiness necessary for an article. If  doesn't include a clause for people who gained notoriety for something not directly causally related to their line of work, perhaps it's  that's wrong, and not the article. He passes GNG easily and I reckon that that's more important than passing the more specific guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Starters, being "popular" on reddit doesn't make someone noteworthy. All articles are on the same topic, him being popular on reddit, seems a bit tautological.  and  also seem to justify flagging this for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:NOTWHOSWHO)

Comment: edit conflict) Someone who contributes to Reddit can in principle be as notable as someone who appears on/in radio, TV, print journalism, theater, as a YouTube performer, etc. It's all just media. What matters is whether sources meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic satisfies the |general notability guideline, as witnessed by references that are cited in the article. That should be the end of the conversation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject meets , thus qualifying for an English Wikipedia article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Multiple reliable, independent, third-party sources have written in detail about the subject, so this subject satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree with the above user that the subject meets . --unsigned entry from Virginia  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/24.125.134.181|24.125.134.181
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Popularity on a social media website is not grounds for notability. Apart from some popularity among some users on the site, the subject isn't notable in any way, and any semblance for now is |temporary and recent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)