Deletion of Social information seeking

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: bad nomination,  and behavior from editors are not reasons for deletion, since the article's creator doesn't own the article. No claim as to why the content could be non-neutral beyond redemption, so no reason to delete is given; behavioral guidelines don't uphold deletion of articles, content guidelines do. The Google Scholar link above returns an abundance of research papers from numerous independent researchers, so the  is more than met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:GNG)

Comment: A quick GScholar search shows over 270 hits for the term and multiple papers where this topic is a central part of the paper. The topic is notable. While there may be issues with neutrality and due weight in the article, correcting these is a matter of editing, not deletion. The topics social search and collaborative information seeking and Social information seeking all seem to have some overlap, but organizing or merging these topics can be done outside of AfD. A notable topic and surmountable article problems, per  suggest that this article be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: Nominator's arguments are, at best, evidence for redirecting or merging; either we should keep this article or redirect it to social search.  Moreover, authors are welcome to cite their own works if said works have been properly published in peer-reviewed contexts, and the only reason we would delete a page that's safe in this way is if it were so heavily self-promotional that it qualified for speedy deletion as promotional or for  treatment; after looking over the article, I'm confident that it qualifies for neither of them.  Merging is a discussion that can be held separately; I have no opinion on it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)