Deletion of Albert M. Wolters (2nd nomination)

Comment: Google Scholar shows almost 400 cites for his book ''Creation Regained''. This is ''very'' high for theology, and demonstrates that he has had a "significant impact in his scholarly discipline". Thus,  #1 is clearly met. See also the arguments in the previous AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert M. Wolters (second nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: passes . Theologians are always difficult but I think he passes pretty easily. As mentioned earlier, his book, ''"Creation Regained: Biblical Basics for a Reformational Worldview"'' is currently show 293 citations for the 2005 version (none for the 1985 version that I can find) which is a pretty decent number in Theology. Additionally, WorldCat is showing his books in a number of prominent Divinity schools such as Boston University School of Theology,  Yale University, Harvard University Divinity School Library, Duke University, University of Notre Dame, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)