Deletion of 27 Club

Comment: When this was re-created, I decided to do some research and see if my assumptions were right that this article is  on a neologism.  Much to my surprise, I '''did''' find multiple sources for the phrase "27 Club" being used to group these particular individuals together, as well as one that comments on the spike in statistics among 27 year old musicians and artists (from http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/writers/304767_writer23.html Charles R. Cross article: "The number of musicians who passed away at 27 is truly remarkable by any standard. Though humans die regularly at all ages, there is a statistical spike for musicians who die at 27.")  Check the footnotes I added, and my notes about the sources on the talk page.  Do I think this article is ''needed'' on WP?  Not particularly.  But it is  sourced now.  I do fear it could be a magnet for OR, but that's not necessarily a reason to delete.  However, I have to wonder if the topic might be better served by a simple category rather than an article.  But I lean towards having a short article so the sources can be linked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: to mee, deletion seems mandatory by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)