Deletion of Individual Choose Your Own Adventure Books

Comment: to List of Choose Your Own Adventure books. They seem to all be plot summary articles with nothing indicating independent notability. A single article covering the series is appropriate, but what we have now is a textbook example of |undue weight. And '''reject''' calls to shut this discussion down on |procedural grounds- the fact is that there's ''no'' good way of doing mass nominations like this. If someone creates a batch nom, there's always some rules lawyer who wants to invalidate the entire discussion by quibbling about a single entry, and if they're nominated individually people complain that commenting on so many different discussions is a hassle
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:WIKILAWYER)

Comment: The books all have distinct titles and so these are useful search terms.  When some or all of these titles seems notable, as indicated above, deletion ''en masse'' is not a sensible suggestion.  Per our |deletion policy, alternatives to deletion such as merger should be explored more thoroughly as these are easier to reverse in case of error and would give a better result for our readership
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: or '''redirect''' to List of Choose Your Own Adventure books as all article fail |notability criteria for books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)