Deletion of Outsider (comic) (3rd nomination)

Comment: This webcomic does not satisify , which is the guidelines many editors here agree on a notability for websites.  That means, somewhere in the article must provide |citations to |reliable sources which have already discussed and |verified this webcomic.  It could be a traditional media outlet, or a well known web award, or other standards as detailed in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WEB)

Comment: I don't see how  has any application to a work of fiction, particularly one which exists in its entirety on the web page in question. I don't think the issue is about the accuracy of the information in the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Let's try to be honest. The article by itself is fine, but the subject fails at  which seems to be the main argument against it.  is a notability criteria guideline, reading Wikipedia:Notability I found the following: "'''There is no official policy on notability'''". This seems to be a little akward to me. If there is no official notabilty policy how can you use it as your main argument for the deletion of this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per lack of |reliable sources and per excellent argument by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Per Wikipedia:Verifiability, "If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic." Also, per  an indiscriminate collection of information, "Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance." This article is not supported by reputable third-party sources, nor does it assert any historical significance for its topic, therefore it does not meet our official content policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Being nominated for an obscure award (and not winning) does not make something notable. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: as failing .  Bring it back when there's indpendent coverage of it as per AnonEMouse
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Good article, it looks like a good comic, but can someone explain to me how this comic meets ? —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No reliable secondary sources of information regarding the notability of this.  Doesn't meet  at all.  For what its worth, I would've closed the previous AFD as delete, due to complete lack of arguments based on WP policy/guidelines and instead stuff like "the comic clearly exists and has some history".  I'm actually busting out the "strong" delete on this one, which I haven't done in awhile
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per danntm:  might be a guideline but  is policy. Until someone who might be considered a |reliable source writes about this, it has no place on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: as failing  per Wickthewok
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)