Deletion of Sean Lynch (footballer) (2nd nomination)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: subject clearly meets  and . I think it would set a dangerous precedent if people can come on and just request deletion for no good reason (). Where do you draw the line in terms of someone requesting deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: If the subject has verified his identity to OTRS satisfaction, has properly requested deletion of the article, and is largely non-notable apart from meeting , then I have no problem honoring . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: Although they are not used as references in the article, there are several news stories specifically concerning this player, including http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/st_mirren/8858639.stm this and http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/f/falkirk/7624309.stm this from the BBC and http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/st-mirren-ace-sean-lynch-1098984 this from the Daily Record. If you Google Sean Lynch, there are hundreds of football-related links, so it's not as if deleting this article will hide anything. Furthermore, I can't see how  can possibly apply here, as he clearly isn't a "non-public figure" – he's played several matches in the top division of a fully-professional league, and has also been capped at youth level and was in the squad for the 2007 FIFA U-20 World Cup (and played in http://www.fifa.com/u20worldcup/matches/round=249401/match=58873/index.html#statistics#nosticky one of the games). He's played several times in front of five-figure crowds, so is a public figure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: Clearly passes  and , as see above. Just a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: is clearly notable and had a sizeable career, so  doesn't really apply - furthermore as Number 57 says it's pointless anyway, there's hundreds of articles about him anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)