Deletion of Block N Load (video game)

Comment: WP:ORG is totally irrelevant, we're talking about a game here. The game is ''clearly'' passing GNG, look at http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-11-20-runescape-dev-jagex-announces-5v5-fps-block-n-loadhttp://www.pcworld.com/article/2849820/block-n-load-hands-on-preview-minecraft-plus-guns.htmlhttp://www.pcworld.com/article/2849820/block-n-load-hands-on-preview-minecraft-plus-guns.htmlhttp://www.pcgamer.com/block-n-load-is-built-for-fing-mental-online-trolling/http://www.gamespot.com/articles/rad-looking-game-combines-fps-and-block-building/1100-6423714/http://kotaku.com/blocknload-mixes-minecraft-with-team-fortress-2-1661536334http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/gaming/news/a612056/minecraft-style-shooter-block-n-load-announced-by-jagex.html#~oZGZVRmwMwKo8K, etc. Being a first foray for Jagex, whom are extremely notable thanks to RuneScape, into a new genre for them is also pretty noteworthy, and is alluded to in some of those sources. These days, there are so many games coming out on Steam that this level of coverage is certainly not routine, and many of these are quite in-depth pieces. The article is terrible, but that's the only issue here bar a failure of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)