Deletion of Leilani Leeane

Comment: While GNG is not the be-all and end-all that's etched in stone, the fact of the matter is that regardless of what guideline is used, there is insufficient notability to be found here. Also, it should be noted that the |bad faith of some of the !voters above is absolutley ''appalling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: This article abysmally fails , because AFAICS there is no evidence of any substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.  Some editors seem to regard GNG as a sort of technical obstacle which can be circumvented by a specialist notability guideline, but that misses the point.  Wikipedia articles must be based on independent reliable sources, and unless those sources exist, any page should have no content. If the subject has won a significant award, then include that fact in an article on the award and/or a list of winners.  But without the sources, there should not be a standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  because she won the Urban X Award for Female Rising Star. "Consensus" established by users who have given no reasoning besides " just don't like it" is not a legitimate argument for degrading the value of the Urban X Award. I have seen AfD's in which recipients of these awards were deleted and I would like to know what the problem is with this particular award. Can someone please answer that for me? The only difference between this and other well-known and significant industry awards is that the Urban X Award is entirely focused on ethnic pornography. I'm not familiar with music WP articles, but I doubt that the Latin Grammy Award is excluded from consideration in  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:I||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:ANYBIO)