Deletion of Robert M. Hensel

Comment: COI is not grounds for deletion. Quick google http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22Robert+M.+Hensel%22&ie=UTF-8 turns up 3-different secondary sources from major newspapers, meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Given that this article was re-created after having already been deleted once, it's difficult for me to |assume good faith. The three  ghits are to two local newspapers (the daily The Post-Standard|Syracuse Post-Standard and the semi-weekly http://www.valleynewsonline.com/ Fulton Valley News), neither of which is a major media outlet. Additionally, his writing honors seem to be of the poetry.com sort (where all it takes to be included is for your check to clear) and all links to his page were created by this same editor. When he says that his goal is to "Wikipedia talk:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_M._Hensel|promote my accomplishments in hopes of inspiring others to go beyond their limitations such as I have" then I think that the article falls under #ADVOCATE. If there are other people outside himself/his wife who thinks that he's sufficiently notable to have an entry, then let's see some editing by others and ask
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NOT)