Deletion of Noah Evanchuk

Comment: as he fails  and no other credible claim to notability is made.  This current wave will end, Bearcat, when these Canadian elections are done, but there will be more waves to come.  We need to be vigilant in enforcing our consensus here, or we will be flooded by promotional articles about unelected politicians
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: doesn't meet  or .  Without prejudice to re-creation if he should win the seat he's running for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: as things stand.  A politician does not need to win an election to be notable.  However, if they haven't been elected (to at least prov level), they need to qualify under  like anybody else.  I see a lot of passing mentions of him.  But, there's nothing substantial and independent that focuses on him.  I object to the improper synthesis of sources here.  A couple articles mentioned him, barely, as a lawyer in specific cases.  That was spun into to a more general statement of working at "all levels" of court, as though that's something special (I'm guessing there's not that many levels in the province anyhow).  Finally, as Bearcat mentioned, being president of a provincial party isn't adequate for inclusion, so being an executive on a youth group in a party, clearly doesn't cut it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)