Deletion of Rachel Rosalen

Comment: or '''|PNJCS'''. Thank you, {{Ping|DGG}}, for copying those citations and links. I agree that it would be rash to claim that this article is unreferenceable—in fact, I found http://ultimosegundo.ig.com.br/cultura/2013-05-15/artistas-usam-predio-em-sao-paulo-como-tela-para-obras-digitais.html this myself. I did read both versions of the article and I looked at the edit history for each. This article has been orphaned in more ways than one, however, and I wanted some discussion about whether or not the subject was, in fact, ”…regarded as an important figure … widely cited by peers or successors … known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique, etc.” |WP:ARTIST. Neither the ptWP or enWP article has had significant work done in the past 4–5 years and notability can change
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (:WP:PNJCS||:WP:ARTIST)