Deletion of FECRIS (2nd nomination)

Comment: http://books.google.com/books?q=fecris+cults&btnG=Search+Books 35 sources in books, http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=fecris+cults&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search 22 scholarly sources. Easily satisfies , subject has ''|received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE)

Comment: I will improve this article with / secondary sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Among the Google News hits a few of them are for people with the last name Fecris as well. I can't read any of the news articles except the one from Jerusalem Post, "COUNTERING CULTS", and that one requires a subscription. The burden of proof for |notability lies with those adding information or wanting to keep an article, you don't have to prove non-notability. The article itself has zero reliable sources and doesn't even attempt to explain why the subject is notable, it essentially says that it exists, is involved with cult activities, and then lists its members
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)