Deletion of Taharrush gamea

Comment: the amount of references means it has achieved  and therefore  notability and so the article can't be deleted. It could be improved with prevalence, history, definition etcetera
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Those who want this deleted have no strong arguments towards its non-notability and while it requires an increase in credible sources it is certainly within 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: obviously passes notability requirements ().  Clearly a contentious topic, content must be worked out on talk page, but deletion is an unreasonable alternative here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as |neologism. Article relies entirely on sources from the past few days. Google Trends indicate it's extremely recent,https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=Taharrush and there's pretty much just a single hit on Google Books.https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=taharrush It ''might'' be relevant to redirect it to New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany, but a standalone article is extreme |recentism and sensationalism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:RECENTISM)