Deletion of Threadster

Comment: does not |cite its sources; furthermore, there is no mention of a Threadster on any search engine (http://www.google.com/search?as_q=Threadster&num=50&hl=en&lr=lang_en&as_ft=i&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i%20343 search example) bar the link given from UrbanDictionary.com in the article and websites named Threadster
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: not that popular of a term that I know of, most likely a non-notable |neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: WP:NEO and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per #DICT, in addition to OR/lack of RS as noted by nom. Article provides no more information than a bare definition, needs to supply some background on history, use and context of term to be encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)