Deletion of Powerhouse Films

Comment: No indications of notability for this company. Notability is not inherited and this topic appears to rely on the notability of some of the movies it is associated with. The Keep !votes above fail to provide any reasoning for assertions such as "passes " or that the nomination is "more than a little malicious". The criteria for establishing notability requires two intellectually independent references from reliable sources. That available references fail  and/or . Topic fails GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: does not meet  /  and significant RS coverage not found. Film distribution companies are rarely notable and this one misses the mark. Notability is not inherited from the notable films in its catalogue and there's nothing better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: and a Note to Closing Admin. Please note the number of suspiciously fresh editors to this AfD - {{noping|Flux Ultra}}, {{noping|Sarac3ns}} and {{noping|Ciccio.santini}} in particular. To date, several editors have pointed out that they are unable to find references that meet the criteria for establishing notabilty as required for organizations per GNG and . Can any of the editors who believe that there are references for this topic that meet the criteria for establishing notability, please post links here so that other editors can determine if there are good references available to establish notability? Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: This article subject fully passes  with significant coverage across multiple sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Company fails notability guidelines.  The catalogue content has already been deleted at AFD per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTCATALOGUE)

Comment: if, as it appears, this company distributes films rather than makes them or has any creative input. |Notability would need to be achieved by receiving general, secondary, non-industry coverage about the company, rather than piggy-backing on the notability of the films. It's only been established for a year, so unlikely to have made any lasting impact. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: It passes , "Label has won awards ("Indicator won Home Cinema Choice magazine's Label of the Year award". Direct interviews with the magazine are http://www.homecinemachoice.com/news/article/raiding-the-hollywood-vault/24461 here as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: None of the "substantial coverage" is intellectually independent. The first cite is an interview with the founder and therefore fails . The second cite is an accouncement/press release and likewise fails  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)