Deletion of Confabulation (neural networks)

Comment: fails , falls under , possibly . Confabulation is a valid psychological concept but I see no evidence that the term is discussed in this particular manner by anyone but Stephen Thaler. The article's editing history—as well as this AfD discussion—raise major ,  or  concerns. Exclusive Google searches like http://www.google.com/search?q=Confabulation+%22synthetic+neural+networks%22+-wiki, http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aconfabulation or http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Confabulation+*+*+neural+process%22+OR+%22Confabulation+*+neural+process%22+-wiki show no relevant results. None of the listed references are |valid or indicative of |notability: the topic has to receive ''significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject'' in order to satisfy the inclusion criteria for standalone articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:POVFORK||WP:PROMOTION||WP:COI||WP:SPA||WP:CANVASS||WP:RS||WP:N)