Deletion of Lost, Scotland

Comment: as per , ''Some topics are considered of inherent value for inclusion without the assertion of notability, such as cities, villages, lakes, rivers, and mountains
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Agreed, this seems very much like borderline |disrupting wikipedia to prove a point, trying to reduce the list of items on the Disambig page to make the move argument seem stronger
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: all cities are inherently notable, as WP:NOTABILITY says.  Looks like this AfD is just to make a  since he's trying to get the TV show Lost moved to Lost
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Real town. Per , "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size."  No need to go against precedent (or for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:AFDP||WP:DISRUPT)

Comment: Just thought I should point out that the nominator is campaigning heavily to have Lost (TV series) moved to Lost (currently a disambiguation page). See Talk:Lost (TV series), consensus was not reached in the discussion. This may be an unrelated notability concern (|Assume good faith, Canley, assume good faith!), but this makes me highly skeptical of the motive behind this nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)