Deletion of UFC on FX: Maynard vs. Guida (2nd nomination)

Comment: I don't see evidence that this article passes  or .  However, merging it into an omnibus UFC event article makes sense to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: per . The deletes on these UFC related articles are  or perhaps better yet "I don't know anything about it so I won't follow . Just about all UFC events are covered in the mainstream press, USA Today, Yahoo Sports, Sports Illustrated, etc. The Pay-Per-View events feature title fights and number one contender fights. They involve notable fighters. They are watched by an international audience of hundreds of thousands if not millions. They do not occur on a daily, or weekly basis, as with other sports' seasons. Deleting this article makes Wikipedia less useful as a reference guide. These nominations are essentially disruptive vandalism of this project as they waste our time and flood the encyclopedia with these silly and unnecessary discussions rather than articles that are at least helpful for someone. --Special:Contributions/24.112.202.78|24.112.202.78
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The article appears to contain only #NEWS|routine news reporting on things like fight announcements.  It contains only one non-MMA related source which is borderline in terms of compliance with  and its request of "significant coverage" in sources that are "independent of the subject".  Finally, the article contains practically no prose and does not |contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)