Deletion of VisualEditor

Comment: per .  The article has been fixed up with good sources. Alternately, redirect to guinea pig per carrite (/snark
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: The article is now developed to a point in which merge to MediaWiki - already a rather big article - is not necessarily a good idea anymore. So, while this is purely a ''technical'' reason not to merge, I believe it is still valid, and that's why I'm striking out my initial position ("Merge", see above). The reason I'm not changing it to "Keep" is that I'm still far from convinced in continued notability (= beyond ) of the subject in the future, as already argued
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to MediaWiki. Is there coverage? Yes. Is it independently notable? Not in the slightest. Most of the coverage violates  as being stuff about its release. 155blue's sources both fall into that trap, as do the majority of Widefox's sources (many of which fall a long way short of RS anyway, such as Wikipediocracy and Examiner
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Mediawiki. The topic is not independently notable and the sources are generally not Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the topic. I see that the article is already long; some of the (un-sourced or poorly sourced) content can be moved to isualEditor, especially that which cannot be merged into Mediawiki. I also agree with
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)