Deletion of David Masciotra

Comment: There's an awful lot of material online ''by'' Masciotra, and an awful lot of profiles of him{{emdash}}on the websites of the numerous publications for which he's written, so the contribute nothing to . The only discussion ''of'' him I've found so far has amounted to scathing criticism over something he wrote for ''Salon''. No clear signs of  yet. Even so, I'm not done searching, but I'm depositing this comment here for the time being for consideration by others, for what it's worth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: We can keep a writer under  if his works get coverage, but I am not finding reviews of David Masciotra's books, or published INDEPTH consideration of them in the years since publication.  We can also keep an individual who generates   in the form of multiple profiles of him that are INDEPENDENT and INDEPTH. The problem here is that while Masciotra has written many articles and several books, neither he nor the books has generated  that I can find.  I am always willing to change an iVote if someone comes up with solid sources, feel free to ping me to reconsider if someone does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Insufficient depth of coverage to address  notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article isn't remotely promotional. It consists of two perfectly neutral, objective sentences stating who he is and the subjects of three works he's written. He did make the common mistake, in the case of a subject's written and online works, of citing the works themselves rather than independent reliable sources for purposes of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)