Deletion of Serena van der Woodsen

Comment: The nomination fails to provide any evidence to support its vague suppositions nor considers any alternatives such as merger or redirection per .  Searches indicate that the character is, in fact, notable, as one would expect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: As bad as these articles may be per #PLOT,  and  (i.e. I wouldn't mind seeing them deleted), it is often easier to make a decision about such articles that can become GAs one day when they have been "warned" through notability templates or merge/redirect proposals for a while. Even then, you wouldn't get more than a ''redirect'' from me. &ndash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:WAF)

Comment: I don't watch this programme, but everything seems in order. I hate to break , but Doctor Who has articles for pretty much all of its characters. So does Friends. I feel  may be the motivation behind this nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)