Deletion of Affirmative action at the University of Michigan

Comment: It is notable per  - UMichigan's affirmative action program is covered extensively in secondary sources because of the legal history. These cases are major landmark United States Supreme Court cases. They are referred to as ''The Michigan Affirmative Action Cases'' in peer reviewed journals. It is hard to overstate the importance of ''Grutter'' and ''Gratz'' - I ran a search for ''Grutter'' in HeinOnline and got 6,059 hits. I think it may seem random for those who aren't familiar with American constitutional law but ''Grutter'' is not cherry picking, establishing diversity as a compelling interest in affirmative action cases was huge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I had essentially the same thought as Seraphim--even if most schools' affirmative action programs don't warrant articles, that doesn't mean we shouldn't have pages for the ones that have attracted such significant legal action and secondary source commentary. One could easily make a very worthwhile encyclopedia page for the University of Texas's affirmative action program, along the same lines. Passes GNG and the spirit behind it at : we have plenty of sources to write a substantial, balanced encyclopedia entry. (It shouldn't need saying but keep in mind too that notability inheres in the topic, not the entry: if we even began to list https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22affirmative+action%22+%22university+of+michigan%22&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C47 all the journal articles relevant to this entry, we'd truly drown in citations. Whether or not they've yet been added to the entry doesn't bear on AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WHYN)

Comment: I see enough .  Appears to be well researched
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)