Deletion of PeekYou

Comment: Sufficiently in-depth Coverage in TechCrunch http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/14/peekyou-peekanalytics-social-analytics/ http://techcrunch.com/2007/08/30/peekyou-spock-has-competition/ and to a lesser extent in WSJ http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703358504575544381288117888, CNET http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-9746021-2.html, and Mashable http://mashable.com/2007/11/28/peekyou-google/ http://mashable.com/2007/07/17/people-search/, and some TV coverage http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/peekyou/ (scroll down), plus mention in something like 40 books (per GB search) makes it certainly pass  in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: they are mentioned in various books, including on page 261 of "Online Reputation Management for Dummies" http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SEMJShMCQpsC&pg=PT261 - and the "for Dummies" series is quite mainstream I think. I'm not a regular at AfD (yet) and not so familiar with  but I think this could be a contender to be kept. Thanks &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)