Deletion of Pete Holly (2nd nomination)

Comment: Contrary to JzG, I found many hits in Google. His website claims that his video is Grammy nominated (but doesn't state which year, so this is difficult to research). He has a discography, so he'd meet several criteria at . I'd say {{tl|holdon}} until further sources can be found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: It's still not clear to me what  criteria he meets, if any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: No sources cited at all, so delete as |unverifiable unless good citations are provided prior to expiration of AfD discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: seems sound (excuse the pun) enough to me. I've done some cleaning up. Vanity is not a cause for deletion - only non-notability. See anity|Vanity. Plenty of articles have the "currently lives" line. Do we really want to dispute that and remove it from the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: if sourced.  Recording career does not look notable, involvement on the Grammys etc. probably tips him over the edge into  land.  But as stated above, there is almost nothign on which to base an artivle on the web, so anyone with access to treeware resources should join in now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: seems like the first deletion may have been an error, hence no speedy as a recreation. If this guy actually is a recording artist and fulfills criteria on  then I would be inclined to vote weak keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Doesn't meet  or any other notability standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)