Deletion of Sexuality of Robert Baden-Powell (3rd nomination)

Comment: or '''merge''' to the article about the man himself, definitely don't delete this content. Passes  and  anyway, so I see no good reason for deletion. However I wouldn't stand for the existence of articles of this type if the subject is a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: it sounds like this nomination is a case of , perhaps a clarification could be made as to why, according to policy, this article should be deleted? It is sourced with references, so it's not an issue with . There may be some  issues, but this is not a reason for deletion. The reason for a separate article is probably because Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell is over 40kb long already
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS||WP:NPOV)

Comment: more than enough sources. The main article on Baden-Powell is already  very long. / are what matter here. (I have to say that I'm a bit surprised that there is this much well-sourced content on this topic but hey...). The previous AfDs give additional good reasons for keeping
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)