Deletion of Outbreak (online game)

Comment: lacks any |reliable secondary sources (reviews for instance) which demonstrate |notability for web content. Indie/low-budget MMOGs are probably the most difficult type of videogame to get reviewed, even flash games get better coverage (and that's saying something), the sheer volume of them doesn't help either. It does look interesting, but until it gets some independent coverage from reliable sites/mags there's nothing to hang an article on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)

Comment: Google's giving me a various results, but most are related to a similarly-named flash game, something to do resident evil etc and very few are what we're looking for. No media coverage, external reviews etc. Seems to me to be |soap boxing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)