Deletion of Guild Wars articles

Comment: Characters'' who appear in the manual as main characters should be kept. They are main characters and as per  they are allowed to hae spin-off articles as long as they do not fit in the main article. They are notable to the population of the game 2+ million people, and they are verifiable as they are in the manual of the game, by the creators, who say what does and doesnt exist in Guild Wars. As for WP:OR unless they articles are asserting facts not supported by the manual, then that needs to be brought up seperatly and addressed, not have the article deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: multiple people have said to merge the character articles into a list-of, and there is certainly precedent for such listified pages according to . It is a compromise that I am happy to accept, as I indicated in the nomination. I have initiated a merge on List of Guild Wars characters and invite all interested parties to contribute to that page. I propose that a deletion consensus on the individual character pages not be taken as a consensus to delete the character list page also, but that it be put through AfD separately if anyone wishes it deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: Lets see violates , , ...the list goes on. I like Guildwars but this stuff really isn't for Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: My first thought would be to '''merge''' all of the character articles into a "List of" article and '''delete''' the other articles because #Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information|Wikipedia is not a video game guide. However, if these are copyvios, then '''Delete all''' is the only response
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)