Deletion of Tamaskan Dog

Comment: hoax or not, I am unable to find any references outside of the single source identified above, so it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: appears to be thinly disguised |spam for author
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: article fails
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: This is |spam meant to make the Tamaskan Dog breed known and to make money off breeding mutts under a high-falutin name. Wikipedia is not for advertising or for getting attention for something not notable yet. It's for things that are ''already notable''. The Tamaskan dog is not yet notable any more than shimaltipoos are notable. There's nothing wrong with a mutt: you can get a loving one at any animal shelter. You don't need a high-falutin name and price to get one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: While I laud users Badbilltucker, Keesiewonder and Wwwwolf for their efforts to maintain |civility and |assumption of good faith in this discussion, I want to point out that as of today, there are ''no'' |verifiable secondary |reliable sources to establish |notability, breeding community acceptance, or even existence of this breed. Everything I've turned up on searches are WP mirrors or sites that accept user submissions, (often the submissions are identical from one site to another), all of which seem to lead back to the author's web site on Tamaskans. The article itself is a |conflict of interest as the author or people associated with the author seems to be the only source of information, and the links in the article lead only to web sites maintained by that group of people
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL||WP:AGF||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:COI)

Comment: the article fails , plain and simple
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)