Deletion of Satyanarayanan Chakravarthy

Comment: as a non-notable person failing , specifically  and , with no reliable independent in-depth sources. Article was moved to mainspace without full AfC procedure. Almost all sources with content in the article are short profiles, not independent or not about the subject. The closest ones are the two BuisnessLine articles, but neither is about the subject. The awards received appear to be minor and so not enough for ACADEMIC.  —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: mostly per nom and the comments of Hellknowz and Vanamonde93 above. I am somewhat less inclined to dismiss academic awards outright but several of the awards listed are for young researchers, and don't contribute to  notability, while others don's look particularly significant. Citability here is pretty low, especially for the high citation engineering field. The top cited publications in Google Scholar have 69, 61 and 52 citations correspondigly. For someone who is genuinely academically notable in this field, with the research careeer that is almost 25 years long, I would have expected to see a lot more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Article relies heavily on primary sources, and verges on the promotional. Awards of any sort are a dime a dozen in academica; they need to be significant awards to count towards notability. I don't see evidence that this individual meets either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)