Deletion of Garadaghly Massacre

Comment: This is a well-sourced article for a topic of its nature. There is already a fine article on an apparently Khojaly Massacre|directly-related massacre, as well as several others. If there are opposing points-of-view on the subject, and I do not doubt that there are, I encourage those with that point-of-view to introduce it to the article. If the nominator can supply very compelling and direct evidence that none of the 19 sources supplied in the article are reliable then I might be inclined to change my mind, but while it is important to avoid a |non-neutral point of view in articles it is arguably more important to approach such articles with an eye to ''fixing'' them, not ''deleting'' them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per MarshalBagramyan. For the closing admin, please remember that users who use WP as a attleground are well represented amongst both Azeri and Armenian users
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: The response to POV materials is balance. The response to a POV title (if it can be substantiated as POV and fails ) is a page move. Unless the nominator and others can demolish all the sources (and "they're Azeri" does not qualify as demolishing), we have a notable, sourced article here. Go fix its other problems outside AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: Are people above really dismissing sources simply because they are Azeribajiani? When did  start demanding international reporting on events taking place in an individual country? I do not get that argument at all
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)