Deletion of ST Andromedae (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails .  Not naked eye, not discovered before 1850, not in a catalogue of high historical importance, no popular coverage, no technical coverage specific to this star or a small number of stars including this one.  There are several dozen papers and catalogues mentioning this star, but that turns out to be largely because it is a carbon star and Hipparcos star so it shows up in a lot of listings.  As a relatively bright, at least at maximum, carbon star it seems like there should be enough material for an article but I couldn't come up with it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTCRIT)