Deletion of Carol Adams (educator)

Comment: Head of a notable teaching organization, and pivotal as a leader of that organization, would appear to pass #c6. More, the reason for that criterion is that coverage of her role as head of organization is likely to exist, as indeed it does: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/education/2000/unions_2000/864200.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/2633099.stm. The nominator's claim of "only reference" seems to indicate a failure of the nominator to perform : That is indeed currently the only reference already in the article, but the nominator should be looking for references that exist outside the article, not judging articles solely by the references that have already been added
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: When I nominated the article, I saw an article about a teacher, with what I considered to be very little notable information. I ''did'' do a  check, searching for news articles and webpages, and came up empty. That, combined with the flags that the article has had for 5 years and the only reference being an obit, merited a AfD discussion in my mind. The article is vastly improved now. I see this as being the benefit of the AfD process
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: including per , "has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication," and the essay 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:DINC)