Deletion of Cory Barlog

Comment: This guy easily passes GNG.  Nom fails .  See e.g. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gaming/features/god-war-interview-creative-director-cory-barlog-reimagining/ interview in the Telegraph and https://www.rollingstone.com/glixel/features/hands-on-with-god-of-war-evocative-gaming-bliss-w518039 interview in Rolling Stone, not to mention literally hundreds of interviews in top gaming blogs.  Oh, and if you're thinking that interviews aren't reliable sources, perhaps they're not, but clearly they are sufficient to establish notability, e.g. per . Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:INTERVIEWS)

Comment: In-depth interviews with Daily Star, Telegraph, Gamespot and Hardcore Gamer just to name a few third party publications.  The list goes on and on.  I am  with this nomination but question how much research was done before the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: People, interviews are first party commentary. You need third party sourcing to prove notability. () I'm not saying he's not notable - I haven't looked it up yet - I'm just saying, if people start throwing down some valid deletion rationales, all these "but I found this interview" comments are going to be disregarded
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)