Deletion of List of Irish centenarians

Comment: per nom: this is almost entirely based on original research. And per Fram: "a list of people notable for thing X, but grouped by thing Y, is a bad list." I've just copy-edited the page. One red flag is the repeated use of "notable" in the subheds. It ought not be there. If they're not notable, they shouldn't be here in the first place. Another is the wacky notion that, in Ireland, 100 = 110. I've requested a citation for that dubious assertion. Still another is the list of "Unverified" centenarians. Say what?! I've deleted the double entries for these four, leaving them under "Unverified" but deleting them from "Individual biographies." But what the heck are unverified entries doing on this list?  is a pillar. Finally, this assertion does not reflect the way AfD's are supposed to work: "Given that this AFD does not cover any of the other Lists of centenarians, it could only result in deletion if it provided some valid rationale specific to ''this'' list that would not be true of all such centenarian lists." Ummm, we create, edit and delete articles around here one at a time. #Deletion_of_articles| is not a useful, or even valid, argument opposing deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: a list of people notable for thing X, but grouped by thing Y, is a bad list. People should be grouped, listed, for the thing(s) they are notable for, not for a different reason. , if you want a policy for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per David in DC. This list is partly an original research grouping of non-notable people, and partly a bizarre intersection of two unrelated attributes: people notable for something other than longevity, who happen to have reached a particular age. Neither aspect meets the criteria for a list, and the fact that  is no reason for keeping this particular mess
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Routine calculations such as age calculation are not considered original research (). Ranking by age is also a routine calculation. Nearly all entries have a source (or dedicated article) which supports the age, birth and death dates given. Entries which can't be verified can be removed without having to resort to deletion of the entire article. '''Yoenit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:CALC)