Deletion of Furcadia

Comment: Why would  apply to a MMOG that's not web-based? Because it has a website? It seems to me that the people who are citing  might not know that Furcadia exists as a standalone client, not on the web. Notability? 60,000+ active players, being one of the early pioneers of the MMOSG genre, lasting 9+ years with no interruption and continuing to grow (no small feat for a video game), and even being a finalist for an award (albiet a minor one) combine to make it seem pretty notable, don't you think? As for verifiability, 3 or 4 good sources and a 3+ more okay sources is quite a bit better than most video game articles. If you think this article isn't well sourced, take a look http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Massively_multiplayer_online_games here. Afd a few dozen video game articles with much fewer sources if it makes you feel good. ...Or, you could actually ''improve'' Wikipedia by helping to make articles better. (strike that, evidently http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism Inclusionism is taboo
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: since there appear to be no non-trivial treatments in reliable secondary sources, so we cannot verify the neutrality of the article.  Also appears to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: do we really need a page for every minor bit of "furry culture"?  A few offhand mentions in a couple of books, no major awards to speak of, doesn't seem to meet , and a very loyal, but very small fanbase.  Doesn't add up to notability to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)