Deletion of Prem Chand Pandey

Comment: As noted earlier, this AfD is a mess. But he appears to pass both #C2 (an award that is supposedly the highest science award in India) and #C3 (Indian national science academy), and the article has been significantly improved since its nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as a http://csirhrdg.res.in/ssb.pdf winner of the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology (the top award for research in india), meets .  But the article suffers from the attention of fanboys and needs a heavy pruning (I am willing to take a shot at it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: This AFD seems to be a mess, but the notability of the article's subject (per ) is not close to questionable. Here are some verifiable facts, any ''one'' of which would make the subjact notable enough, under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROF)

Comment: There are problems with both the above arguments. The citation for the award of the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology states (see above) that the contribution of the subject "has been widely acclaimed", but the citation record with a GS h index = 7 and a WoS h index of 3 (see above), show that his contributions have hardly been noticed. This raises questions about the validity of the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology. However recent awardees like P. N. Vinayachandran have the excellent citation record that is expected. Things may have changed in the 20 years since the award was made to the subject but in view of these questions it may be best if recipients of the award were judged on those of their achievements external to the award. In the present case the citation record of the subject falls well below what would be considered to be the minimum standard for notability under rof #1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)