Deletion of NESOHR

Comment: The fact that the BBC, Amnesty International|Amnesty, and the US State Department have made reference to this organisation's reports to my mind make it quite clearly, and obviously, notable.  |Notability isn't the same as being a |Reliable Source(TM), and there's plenty of space in the article to address the (legitimate) issues that've been raised regarding its independence from the LTTE|Tamil Tigers, or lack thereof
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:RS)

Comment: Fails . Looks nothing more than using Wikipedia for some ones propagandic activities
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Per  ''A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Ultimately, and most importantly, all content must be attributable.'' The article as edited now has coverage of the organization by BBC, Amnesty International and Daily Mirror a notable Sri Lankan newspaper. If you look harder, you will even find more. It is a Stub so someone can improve it later
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: although worthy, this fails  notability unproven
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: People please go ahead and read  carefully. This is very notable and passes  for sure. Also per Taprobanus. Please stop quoting  without fully reading it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: There are plenty of mentions in newshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22NESOHR%22http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22North+East+Secretariat+On+Human+Rights%22http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22NorthEast+Secretariat+On+Human+Rights%22 -- at least some of these seem to be non-trivial. The article should pass |Heyman Standard with some more sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)