Deletion of Chiman Singh

Comment: Per . As stated by nom, there should be more coverage and sources than what is currently listed in order to prove enduring notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: As pointed out by the last two comments, most of the sources are just copies of the PTI News Feed and I don't think what is left, or the subject more generally, is notability enough an article. As the last comment says |Wikiepdia is Not News and there has to sustained in-depth coverage over time about multiple things in order for something to be notability. Which in any meaningful way doesn't seem to be the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree he doesn't meet a strict reading of , but in my mind he just barely meets  with the awards and facility being named after him. I'm thinking of diving students attending the facility and then looking him up out of curiousity and not seeing him here. I made some minor improvements and added a source. But I would like to point out that many of the sources listed above are duplicates of the same PTI news feed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not seeing that he meets SOLDIER or the GNG either.  From what I read out of the voluminous keep arguments, they boil down to "A bunch of 1E casual mentions or namedrops = |significant coverage" and .  Neither are supported by relevant notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:ITSIMPORTANT)