Deletion of The 100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time

Comment: either it violates  or , take yer pick
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: In violation of  and per others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: contentwise this is going to be a POV, Original research, & fanboy magnet unless the section ''"Notable guitarists not on the list commonly cited as deserving of inclusion include..."'' is agressively excised from this list... but that is a content issue.  The real problem is that you take out all the OR & unverified speculation, all you have left is an article about a cover story from one issue of Rolling Stone, which was inexplicably moved to the current namespace, and doesn't really make a strong case for importance of this one RS article. Rolling Stone isn't the be all and end all of guitar playing critique and I would argue isn't even a |reliable source on the topic; this isn't Guitarist Magazine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)