Deletion of Scott Mulholland

Comment: he fails , and passes  just because of one single game. I don't think 21 minutes of Championship football are enough to turn a non-notable subject into a notable one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: He passes  because he played in a Football League Championship match (second level of English football), but coverage of the player specifically is sporadic beyond match reports of that one game, meaning there is a concern re 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:N)

Comment: as he passes  (just), although the article needs improving. The soccerbase reference is sufficient to show that he did play professional football at the second highet level in England
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: passes . Needs improving though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: it really need |sources, thus it fails |our notabilty guidelines, which trumps  easily. Sources were searched for, but couldn't be found, so this isn't a case of (find sources and cleanup). Also I'm one of the few who vote delete for those of American sportspeople. Sources are everything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: I really can't believe the difference we get in reactions to AfDs about American sportspeople and others. We get people arguing for inclusion of articles on amateur American footballers, but here we have a player who has played in a league that has two more fully professional levels below it, and there are people calling for deletion.  sets a useful pragmatic notability level that avoids us having to spend ages debating every individual case. Let's keep it that way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)