Deletion of 125 Group

Comment: As others said: "The test for notability (which can be found at ) is not whether the organization exists or even whether there are "independent sources". The sources must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The sources must also contain in-depth information about the company and be significant. Not a single source passes the test for establishing notability and none of the Keep !voters above have argued anything beyond a simplistic argument of "sources exist". Topic fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: None of the Keep !voters have managed to provide a single reference that meets the criteria for notability and many appear to not grasp the criteria for establishing notability as per . The Keep !voters should point to specific references (as is required) so that we can all examine the sources and comment - otherwise this is just a whole lot of vague noise
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Tagging a notability query might have been a better initial step rather than bringing this article to AfD twelve minutes after it was created? A number of sources are available; I have added a couple to the article, and further coverage can be seen, for example https://www.google.com/search?q=%22125+group%22+Intercity&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj1_L_G-tDmAhXmQkEAHV3fBIgQ_AUoA3oECAwQBQ&biw=1525&bih=674 in this query though, now that an AfD has commenced, it remains to consider whether that mix of announcement-based industry coverage meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: Neither of those books are *about* this organization and both books were written *by* this organization so not an independent source and fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Not only must the sources be independent, but the content must also be independent and not rely on information provided by the organization themselves. Can you point to a source that contains Independent Content? See  for a definition of Independent Content
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: The test for notability (which can be found at ) is not whether the organization exists or even whether there are "independent sources". The sources must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The sources must also contain |in-depth information about the company and be |significant. Not a single source passes the test for establishing notability and none of the Keep !voters above have argued anything beyond a simplistic argument of "sources exist". Topic fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SIGCOV)