Deletion of Dead fury

Comment: Meets  for its genre. A film need not have wide theatrical release to be found notable through its having significant coverage in independent sources considered reliable for sourcing their genre. I am troubled that the film was proposed for deletion within 30 minutes of its creation (and while it was being actively edited) and then sent to AFD 90 only minutes later.  WHat ever happened to reasonable |research into a topic, or consideration that Wikipedia is a |work in progress andthat we do not have to be |immediately perfect?  Yes, the article that was proposed and then nominated was only one sentence,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dead_fury&action=historysubmit&diff=432611165&oldid=432609526 but it '''was''' being actively edited by a new contributorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cervantes666 who was yes, warned that it was tagged and that it was sent to AFD, but who received no other assistance in the article's improvement.  With respects, I wish to remind both the good faith taggerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dead_fury&diff=prev&oldid=432609526 and the good faith nominatorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dead_fury&action=historysubmit&diff=432619314&oldid=432619089 that through just a |little work it was not at all difficult to '''quickly''' turn a 11 word stub into a (so far) 559 805 '''1052''' word http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dead_fury&action=historysubmit&diff=432774584&oldid=432619314 start class article to serve the project and its readers... without making Wikipedia unfriendly to a newcomer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:WIP||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:HEY)