Deletion of StarWind Software (2nd nomination)

Comment: Consensus for "'''''deletion'''''" is quite clear in this case, as was the consensus in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarWind Software |the articles first AFD. Extended inclusion only serves to exasperate and waste the time of other productive editors. This article has been recreated repeatedly "'''''7'''''" ('''SEVEN''') times by multiple  dvertising|advertising-only accounts and has been deleted a total of "'''6'''" ('''SIX''') times by trusted administrators. Notability has not been demonstrated and the sources clearly fail to support inclusion. It is clear based on the history that ''StarWind Software Inc''. has and will contunue its attempts to exploit wikipedia for their own marketing and advertising purposes. "'''Salt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:A)

Comment: I continue to believe there is a notable topic here, but I also agree that this article is terrible.  I thought about fixing it, but I don't have the time, the motivation or the books I'd need.  Here's what's wrong with the article and how to fix it.  I'm still !voting keep, but I'm only one and clearly outnumbered.  These things need to be fixed now or my bet is that article will be gone, |never to reappear
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: I'm not familiar with this product but I had no trouble finding references using Google books, e.g., http://books.google.com/books?id=qXw9p1nzb9QC&pg=PA395&dq=%22StarWind+Software%22&hl=en&ei=XrTfTtDzG4qOiALwvpHJCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CGcQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22StarWind%20Software%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=BAtUWStlEUwC&pg=PA284&dq=%22StarWind+Software%22&hl=en&ei=XrTfTtDzG4qOiALwvpHJCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CE8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22StarWind%20Software%22&f=false and http://books.google.com/books?id=cFL91AZt01YC&pg=PA305&dq=%22StarWind+Software%22&hl=en&ei=XrTfTtDzG4qOiALwvpHJCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CFQQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22StarWind%20Software%22&f=false.  Many more where those came from.  The article may indeed be too commercial, the work of an  and lacking citations to |reliable sources.  But those are content issues; here at AfD, our only concern is notability:  It's not whether the sources have been cited, it's whether they exist.  It appears they do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:RS)