Deletion of Margene's bridal

Comment: I do not see a clear assertion of notability on this unsourced stub.  It's a bridal shop in http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22bridal+shop%22+%2B+%22oakland%2C+CA%22&oq=%22bridal+shop%22+%2B+%22oakland%2C+CA%22&aq=f&aqi=g-K1&aql=&gs_l=hp.3..0i30.67576.76531.1.76936.20.20.0.0.0.0.218.2717.1j18j1.20.0...0.0.vqgJihOLMvA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=d75052a9b55837e0&biw=1024&bih=566 a city with at least a dozen of such businesses!  It's not even the highest rated on Yelp in Oakland.  How can that not be |run of the mill
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: I'd have agreed with speedying it but I don't think the AfD was a waste of time; low-hanging fruit like this can be good practice for people without much experience at assessing AfD criteria, and what is clear to one person may not be to another.  To be clear, I found no |notability implied or present
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: lack of  makes it fail . On the other hand, even if there were refs, the subject is important enough, but just not notable enough to have a article on wiki
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: 4 stars on Yelp isn't very significant. Promotion on a local TV channel isn't either. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: per nom — full of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:WIKIPUFFERY||WP:ARTSPAM)