Deletion of Adam Kontras (2nd nomination)

Comment: on the newly added sources. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, and I still don't see any high-quality sources that can support those |exceptional claims
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:REDFLAG)

Comment: see below). The subject doesn't seem to pass . A cursory glance at the Google results and the article's references didn't reveal any direct significant coverage by reliable secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails . I am yet to see more than one ''notable secondary'' source or ''verifiable tertiary'' source. Primary sources do not contribute to  notability. The secondary source coverage is minimal at best; thus requiring article to have multiple ''english'' or ''quoted in both languages and translated''  sources. Although this seems to fall within  "The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.", I expect to see ''sources''. Anticipating response: Internet archive is a primary source on ''content'', any conclusions are . No other author's appearance gives notability. — &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:NONENG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:OR)