Deletion of SerpLogic

Comment: Per nom. Fails . And . (Is interesting to note the series of edits leading to the article's creation. Though perhaps coincidental, they look similar to patterns typically seen in cases of paid-editing. In which a user account is created, the account makes a series of otherwise unrelated/innocuous edits, waits a few weeks, is marked autoconfirmed, and then makes paid-for edits). Ignoring the means of the article's creation however, the subject of the article's content still fails the expected inclusion criteria. No value to the project in retaining. Only value is to the subject SEO-company's SEO rankings
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: Fails  and GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I agree with {{U|Huon}} There is not enough in depth coverage. The best I could find was an aditional source with some coverage on the company ( http://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/16/154045.html ), but is mostly about its SEO recomendations and not much about the company itself. It may help, but is not enough to meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: Blatant 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)