Deletion of George Atkinson (Olympic footballer)

Comment: presumed notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLYMPICS)

Comment: As an Olympian, he clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)

Comment: This seems to be one of a few  changes following the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bianca Gray. I would recommend a bit of caution here, as the player was active a long time before digital media, the fact that there are not abundant online sources does not mean there would not be more in depth coverage elsewhere (I don't know enough about English football to know if/where). However we do know from one of the https://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/at/george-atkinson-2.html sources used that he played for England Amateurs (at a time when professional football was not as wide ranging as today), represented the UK in an Olympics and was a one-club man with Bishop Auckland, where he won multiple FA Amateur Cups. All of this leads me to suspect there might be significant coverage (probably archival) about this player somewhere. There are definitely male footballers who fail GNG but I don't think this is necessarily one. Further, aside from passing , which I know the nominator is not a fan of,  provides a further (and gender-neutral) presumption that this player is notable. Is there enough here to rebut either or both of those presumptions? I suspect maybe not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY||WP:NFOOTY||WP:NOLY)

Comment: passes , underlining that one of the purposes of such subject specific guidelines is to avoid recentism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)