Deletion of List of Latin phrases (full) (2nd nomination)

Comment: or in the spirit of the page, ''servandus est numerus''.  This list has actually been nominated for deletion ''four'' times in the past (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Latin phrases|here and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Latin phrases (2nd nomination)|here, not included above), and on the last occasion was speedily kept per , with hardly anybody voting to delete it.  As a matter of fact, the list clearly states that it consists of the individual contents of (currently) twenty individual pages (on the previous occasion, it seems to have been divided into three), the contents of which ''were'' transcluded.  However, since Latin phrases can, like English phrases, be worded differently, begin with different words depending on what someone thinks is important, or be easily confused (especially by non-Latin speakers), it makes a great deal of sense to be able to search for them in a single list; not to mention it provides an easy way to look for familiar phrases that might or might not have a Latin origin, or for which the correct or most familiar Latin is unknown (you can't use a Latin dictionary for that as easily).  It would have been more difficult to do so without this article with the individual contents divided into ''three'' separate pages, and it would be ''far'' less useful now that one would have to search through ''twenty'' when one isn't sure what the exact phrase is.  So really, this page is perfectly useful, and deleting it produces no benefit whatever to readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: Even if  was a policy (it isn't, it's just a guideline), the fact that it says splitting and transcoding is an option for a non-mainspace article does not forever foreclose the possibility of doing so in mainspace. We're doing it here, and it seems to be a benefit for the reader without hurting anything
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)