Deletion of Human suit

Comment: I see  thrown around a lot here, what part of that are you talking about, as it does not fall under '''Plot-only description of fictional works''', '''Lyrics databases''', '''Excessive listing of statistics''', '''News reports''' or '''FAQs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: and in consideration of the |work that has gone into this article since it was first nominated, and in consideration of the term finding wide use in http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&num=20&q=%22Human+Suit%22&cf=all reliable sources and many http://books.google.com/books?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&num=20&q=%22Human%20Suit%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np books (Who didn't actually look?).  The article will benefit from expansion and further sourcing as the term exists, is used, and has a fascinating notability. All that need be recognized is the article's delightful |potential for improvement and how it can be made to serve the project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: For additional information on use of  read the  essay
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: The topic is notable and I have recently started development of it.  Deletion is not helpful in this and would be contrary to our |editing |policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Had you provided a single second party reference using human disguise most of those of us on the ''Delete'' side of this discussion would probably have withdrawn the AfD.  As it is all you did was rename the article and proceed to expand the list of fan-cruft.  Furthermore the person who undid your change to the title noted that discussion of changing the title should proceed after the AfD rather than ly doing it before the AfD has completed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: I don't see how this article could ever be anything but 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)