Deletion of Star Sonata (4th nomination)

Comment: after reviewing all the sources I'm not convinvced this meets  the sourcing is very weak Gamespy is just a list, onRPG,com doesnt appear to standup as |reliable source with editorial oversight the piece linked appears to be a blog with no editorial oversight though it is a comprehensive review, Gametunnel appears to be similar though the review is less comprehensive, gamezone posting is a blog by an annonomouse user. Additional sources are from Star Sonata which are self references, or from Reddit which isnt a reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: There's enough coverage in |reliable, third party sources to meet the . I'll concede it isn't pretty, but there's enough there to work with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: This passes  but barely. The Gamasutra article in the references (found http://www.gamasutra.com/view/pressreleases/175219/Indie_MMO_Star_Sonata_announces_the_addition_of_paidstaff.php here) is actually a press release that Gamasutra picked up and put on their website. However, I agree with Thanar's reasoning above for the reliability of the references he cited. I also am not convinced by Gnangarra's reasoning, which was that "I reviewed each of the sources and found them questionable or outright unreliable in establishing notability", as he does not specifically cite why Thanar's reasoning is incorrect. I feel that Gnangarra must not have completely read into the reasoning behind the notability for these websites. The GameZone notability is Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources/Archive_1#GameZone|clearly established here, and I'm swayed by Thanar's arguments about GameTunnel, the one website which I would have to put firmly on the fence. All this said though, this is a minimum, and unreliable references should be cut from the article. Either way though, I !vote for a weak keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I have been a substantial contributor to this article. I think the general notability guideline, whether "a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (), has been satisfied by the following 5 references to 3 independent reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)