Deletion of Parody religion (2nd nomination)

Comment: Topic is notable. Seems to me that the only thing being questioned ''is the Article Title''. What would be a better title? Keeping in mind that "The names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for ''readers'' over ''editors'', and for a ''general audience'' over ''specialists''." (ame
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: an article's age and previous AfD results aren't really a valid argument for keeping/deleting an article in a deletion discussion.  |Consensus can change, especially in 4 years. —&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: For those of you saying the subject is notable, can anyone come up with reliable sources that talk directly about the subject of "parody religions"-- not about FSM, or another one in particular, but about the subject "parody religions".  If we can't come up with that, then the subject "parody religions" is wide open to original research and being our own synthesis of the different religions that we are calling parody religions.  For example, if I have a reliable source that talks about how shoes cause death, and another reliable source that talks about how hats cause death, then those two individual subjects are notable, but if I make an article about how clothing causes death, with only those two sources, then that is original research and a synthesis.  I would need reliable sources on the subject of "clothing causes death" for Wikipedia article on that subject.  So, I haven't gone looking yet, but can anyone find sources for the term/concept of "parody religion"?  If sources can be found, great; if not, this would most likely be better as a list of the religions.  At least, that is how I read  -- specifically  -- or is my logic faulty? —&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)