Deletion of Fatoş Tanzer

Comment: WoS query "Author=(tanzer f*) Refined by: Institutions=(CUMHURIYET UNIV OR HACETTEPE UNIV) Timespan=All Years. Databases=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI" does show 30 papers, but the citations are 60, 7, 7, 7, 6, 5 for an h-index of 5. This is quite short of our usual pass criteria for  #1. Probably could have said week keep if she were to have been the corresponding author on that first paper, but the WoS data show that she is not the corresponder on that one, nor on many of the other publications. Given that there are no biographical sources, article should be stripped to a stub if kept because it's currently almost all . Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:OR)

Comment: Per ,  and , this article fails things that should be avoided in an article and also does not meet enough notability to sustain its maintenance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:SELF||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NOTBLOG)

Comment: Let's begin by |assuming good faith of the original author here, please.  We have a woman who has been a physician and scientist in Turkey for nearly 45 years - I think that she is well past the point where she needs to engage in "blatant self-promotion".   does not apply at all to this article, as that discusses how we should refer to Wikipedia on Wikipedia.  As for , this article has no resemblance whatsoever to a blog.  A Google Scholar search shows that she is the author or co-author of many scientific papers.  I will leave it to others better qualified than I to determine whether she meets , as I am not an academic myself.  We may well conclude that she does not meet our notability standards, but let's not treat this eminent woman with disrespect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:SELF||WP:NOTBLOG||WP:ACADEMIC)