Deletion of Hazard (2005 film)

Comment: In considering  and , the nominator's complaint that the article sat unsourced is a #REASON|pretty weak deletion rationale when even a little  shows |sources toward the topic are available... and more, sources need NOT have been in the article for topic notability to exist. Heck... per  and , he might even have improved it himself.  Of course, now that |this AFD has forced cleanup we can close this and move on.  Kudos to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:UGLY||WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE||WP:HANDLE||WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP)