Deletion of List of most-followed Twitter accounts (2nd nomination)

Comment: as appears to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: A large https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C23&q=most+followed+twitter&btnG= number of studies have been performed on Twitter accounts and interaction, many of which have focused on the most followed Twitter accounts. Additionally, there has been a bit of news coverage (although its far less impressive than the journal articles). I beleive that  has been satisfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per above. Satisfies  (and even ). Has enough secondary source coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:GNG)

Comment: I think this passes even basic notability standards such as 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes . This is not a top-quality source check, but I found https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/the-biggest-twitter-accounts-on-earth/, https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/twitter-follower-counts-drop-fake-users-1202871545/, https://mashable.com/2014/03/21/top-10-twitter-accounts/#p1yb8c2qOsqP, and especially https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-5339733/Top-10-followed-Twitter-accounts-revealed.html (just kidding
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)