Deletion of Unexplained Research

Comment: None of the sources can sustain |notability, but http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DH&p_theme=dh&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=11E1E90C554EE520&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM this, http://mywebtimes.com/archives/ottawa/display.php?id=367477 this, http://www.sj-r.com/news/x767633253/Author-to-discuss-ghosts-and-other-mysteries this and http://www.crookstontimes.com/news/x185284293/Is-UMCs-McCall-Hall-haunted this would seem to show a bit of coverage in |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Totally fails .  Is pure 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ADVERT)

Comment: article is supposedly about a series of notable "properties" but I can find no secondary  to show they are actually notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It's not clear what the article is about exactly, but it would seem it's about the kind-of-organization ''Unexplained Research''  or maybe  it's not clear, needs to be fufilled. Currently the sourcing is inadequate; it's mostly primary with some slow news coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:AUTHOR)