Deletion of Watch Me Do

Comment: this does meet  since it has {{tq|been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label.}} The sources cited in the article are generally considered reliable for music articles, and they are neither reprints of press releases nor advertisements. Note that NSONGS states that songs meeting this guideline are only "probably" notable; most of the sources in the article are published over a short time frame. That said, I don't think  applies here, since this article is not about an event, and I think the coverage this has received amount to a pass of , albeit weakly. Note that if this is determined to be non-notable, it should be merged and/or redirected to Thank You (Meghan Trainor album) instead of Meghan Trainor. I also don't think that Calvin999's edit-warring on this article is appropriate.  is appropriate if |no one opposes, but when someone has reverted the redirecting, and concerns about notability still exist, AfD is the correct venue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG||WP:BLAR||WP:SILENCE)

Comment: for notability from having a promotional single release. I don't mean to offend anyone, but "Few sources and little to no media coverage available" just sounds like a kind-of bullcrap statement in my eyes, given that the song has been reviewed in a fair amount of independent sources following its promo single release. A little bit short, but not so much that its stub length. Its possible the article will expand as more opinions of the song in album reviews and chart positions of the track from digital downloads of the album will occur, but I'll only keep my vote a weak keep just so this statement isn't too -Y
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: I've been scolded and threatened for redirecting the article earlier on, in what later resulted in a condoning of , despite me just following the guidelines as I do with any other article. I guess that is why an official discussion has been opened. I support the reasoning given above (the guidelines are black and white), but I'm abstaining from voting officially. &nbsp;—&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: The single has "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." Therefore the article subject passes  ans should be retained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)