Deletion of Yulchon (2nd nomination)

Comment: Please note that this is not a vote, and no proper arguments have been presented. At best, an argument has been made that better sources may exist. Well, perhaps - but such sources need to be presented. Otherwise no article could be deleted, as one could claim that better sources exist for any AfD topic. I have ensured that WikiProject Korea has been notified through Article Alerts feature, and if any of their members finds a better source, they would/will presumably comment. In light of no such comments, I cannot but conclude that better sources do not exist. As for "6th biggest in Korea", there's no "x-largest in Fooland" provision anywhere in Wikipedia:Notability (companies). Just like in the first discussion, we are seeing nothing but an invalid  statements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSIMPORTANT)

Comment: I have edited the article to change "employs 310 professionals" to "employs more than 360 lawyers", with a 3rd-party source. Is that better? Per , we do allow "legitimate articles about commercial entities." –&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ADMASQ)