Deletion of Battle of Rajasthan

Comment: needs recurring historical sources that actually add up to tell the facts. Going to reconsider if provided enough  (without any synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I don't see any evidence that how it is a , nor there is any policy based rationale. Many sources.https://books.google.com/books?id=xQGwgJnCPZgC&pg=PA49&dq=battle+of+rajasthan+arabs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=6Y9FVcuZA4ynyASBmIG4Cg&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=battle%20of%20rajasthan%20arabs&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=VCvdfNpqBzUC&q=battle+of+rajasthan+arabs&dq=battle+of+rajasthan+arabs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Z5BFVbKhGdGfyATB6IGgCw&ved=0CB0Q6AEwADgo Although if someone else, who is notable and has disputed this popular battle, they can be mentioned
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: as non-|notable, as per rationale of nominator. Just at a cursory search, I can find little to no coverage in |reliable sources extensively documenting this battle. This is just on the assumption of notability. Even if the battle took place, we do not have enough sources to justify a stand-alone article, hence it appears to fail notability. Two or three sources, that too where the authenticity is contested, is not enough. If this battle (assuming it occurred) took place, it can be appropriately summarised at Islam in India or Muslim conquest in the Indian subcontinent, or any other relevant articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS)