Deletion of Gavin Urquhart

Comment: I say that because he fails  as far as additional criteria for athletes goes. He hasn't as yet competed in a fully professional league. Having not played a single game with the Roos he doesn't qualify yet. In commenting on that criteria for athletes however it seems to me that a lot of athletes are deemed to be notable by just having competed at first grade level! I personally feel that many athletes are going to wind up with a Wikipedia page after playing just a few first grade games then retiring with a busted knee! The notability criteria for athletes needs work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Has not played in a fully-professional league and thus fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as Sting_au says, he doesn't meet  for professional athletes. The article does seem to meet the primary notability criterion either insofar as the subject does not seem to have received '''significant coverage''' in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  That said, previous consensus on drafted AFL players seems to run counter to  see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaxson Barham for an earlier discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)