Deletion of Paul Boutin (journalist)

Comment: If he meets notability standards per , there is no need to meet the secondary criteria in .  In my opinion he is notable per  basic criteria. See: http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/431242/0/servicios/alternativos/flickr/, http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/12/see-you-on-the.html, http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2008/12/08/tune-into-the-twitter-rebellion.aspx, http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/08/12/01/1627257.shtml, http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/12/01/reviving-f-ed-company/ &nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BIO)

Comment: In-depth interview on NPR as shown here http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NR&d_origin=transcripts&z=NR&p_theme=nr&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0FF64537FA7E8D9C&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM.  Looked to as expert as shown here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Paul+Boutin%22+Editor.  I believe he meets our guidelines for inclusion here at Wikipedia. Regarding |COI are we reading the same guidelines?  First, it does not say anywhere it is prohibited.  As long as the piece it is written in a |NPOV position, no problem.  Second, |COI is not a valid reason for deletion of an article.  However, if I have misread the guideline I apologize and would ask that you point me to the area I overlooked.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NPOV||WP:COI)