Deletion of Paul Gerhard Vogel

Comment: I'm not really seeing him meeting the criteria laid out in . At best, this is a case of  (he was alive at least in 2006, so it should remain valid): the entire article revolves around his one (admittedly drawn out) experience (as in, the sources cover him only in the context of that event) and it seems to me that he "remains ... a low-profile individual" per the guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Or alternatively, if consensus says that the guy isn't notable by himself, '''merge''' to Persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. It's true that not all of the sources given are reliable, but enough are that it shouldn't be impossible to write a valid article. Rewriting would be a great improvement, but that isn't really a reason for deletion. There does seem to have been a reasonable level of coverage in genuinely reliable sources within the context of the broader topic. This is on the edge of , but I think it falls marginally the right side
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The form of the nomination is non-specific to the article itself. If you have a problem with "sourcing issues", what is the problem? The generic problem with otability (people) such as the subject (i.e. historical significance attested to in one historical work) in this is being discussed in WT:Notability (people). ('''ES'''=>edit summary '''TP'''=>talk page, for the newbies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: According the the gbooks snippets he has his own section in the two books now added to the article as references. Seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)