Deletion of Thomas Robins (politician)

Comment: Norwalk is located inside the New York metropolitan area (it's in that little panhandle of Connecticut that pokes into Westchester County), so I'm not convinced that New York City newspapers giving him obituaries upon his death constitutes notability in and of itself. But apart from the obituaries, this is otherwise far too dependent on |primary sources, and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things, to say that he passes  — literally the only other source left that escapes both of those disqualifiers is purely  verification of an election result in an even ''more'' local-to-Norwalk newspaper, which is a kind of source that every mayor in the history of mayoralty could always show. The inclusion test for mayors of smaller cities is not just being able to cite a few sources to verify that they existed — it's being able to cite enough sources to demonstrate that they're significantly ''more'' notable than most other mayors of most other smaller cities, but the sourcing here just isn't convincingly doing that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Mayors receive |routine coverage; that should be a given. Obituaries in the individual's locality is routine; their election results are, too, routine. Notice the trend? Being verifiable does not grant a politician notability, and these other sources--these passing mentions--do not convince me that |GNG or |NPOL are satisfied. A heymann can be a positive thing when it isn't little more than window dressing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)