Deletion of Dhruv Rathee

Comment: Sources are good enough to pass . He is relevant enough to have 3.2 million YouTube subscribers and for people to write about him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom. The above clap-trap about him being a victim, "a target", for justifying a standalone article is irrelevant and unconvincing. I don't think if he even meets  because the coverage was temporary and the event itself wasn't notable. There are many critics and haters of BJP and BLM, but  has to be met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: It seems articles like that of ''Deutsche Welle'' (https://www.dw.com/en/space-for-media-freedom-rapidly-shrinking-in-india-dhruv-rathee/a-49232009) and ''The Indian Express'' (https://indianexpress.com/article/express-sunday-eye/fun-facts-and-you-youtubers-bhuvan-bam-bb-ki-vines-dhruv-rathee-ramit-verma-poulami-nag-5744397/), combined with the non-trivial coverage that he regularly gets in the mainstream media (https://news.google.com/search?q=Dhruv%20Rathee&hl=en-IN&gl=IN&ceid=IN%3Aen), make him pass . He is certainly not a case of , as he has been regularly in the news since 2018, the year in which ''BBC World Service|BBC Hindi'' interviewed him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cRU32Lph5g. The recent interview by ''The New Indian Express'' (https://www.newindianexpress.com/magazine/2020/jun/07/interview--persistence-and-patience-are-the-hallmarks-of-success-youtuber-dhruv-rathee-2152288.html) also indicates his growing popularity. Here are a couple of other examples of non-trivial coverage: ''Forbes India'' (https://www.forbesindia.com/article/poll-vault/politickle-taking-on-the-establishment-with-memes-mashups-and-potshots/53229/1) & ''The Week (Indian magazine)|The Week'' (https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/2020/01/17/back-end-support.html
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: He fails  in the sense that the significant coverage is not provided to him by the sources which are reliable, independent from this subject. Free Press Journal, Scroll.in, etc. are just not reliable for |notability. The only source from Indian Express is not significant because it talks about a variety of subjects not just this person - doesn't mean that any random person mentioned by the Indian Express deserves their own Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTE)

Comment: as per  and above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)