Deletion of Celtic toe

Comment: per  and  as absolute shameless promotion of an urban legend. Article creator is trying to turn this AfD into an attack page/self-promotion, as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:POINT)

Comment: the citation given for Phyllis Jackson lacks accademic credentials, even in the article no real evidence for this phenomenon is provided (ie it is not based on research, no data are given as to the the differing frequencies of this phenomenon in England compared to other UK countries), only that she ''noticed'' that the foot shape was different. Has she written about this in a peer reviewed article, has she done any '''real''' research? Remember ''Beware false authority.'' and especially ''Exceptional claims require exceptional evidence'' (from ). I do not think this constitutes a Reliable source (and therefore breaches the verifiability policy). The article also doesn't give the alternative POV (and so is in breach of the NPOV policy), which is that English and Non-English British people are really very homogeneous biologically. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/tcga/tcgapdf/capelli-CB-03.pdf
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per , , etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:HOAX)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:POINT)