Deletion of Charles McLaren, 4th Baron Aberconway (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . If we |have a change in consensus, it has to be very clear and I'd like many more !votes, ideally in the 30 to 50 range (pardon the pun). For example when the consensus changed about the automatically notability of high schools and district superintendents. literally hundreds of Wikipedians chimed in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CC)

Comment: For consistency's sake, we already have articles for all baronies like Baron Aberconway where this can be redirected/merged. See Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#Notability_of_peers and ikiProject Peerage and Baronetage: "There is no consensus that nobility infers automatic notability, and a previous proposal to establish this has failed." An  title that once seated one in the house of lords but no longer is therefore no longer automatic notability, exempted from the common sense of requiring significant coverage, or having accomplished something besides a wealthy lineage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:INHERITED)

Comment: to Baron Aberconway. As this person did not sit in the House of Lords, he does not meet . I could find no coverage that would count towards notability, so he fails . Since the article contains no sourced material, a Merge is not appropriate
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:NOPAGE applies here. He inherited in 2003 (after the November 1999 changes), and did not sit in the House of Lords.https://hansard.parliament.uk/search?startDate=1800-01-01&endDate=2020-04-13&searchTerm=Aberconway%20&partial=False Nor does his page usefully interlink some number of otherwise unrelated bluelinks. Nor is there sigcov. Inheriting a Picasso is that's been in the family for generations is literally 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)