Deletion of HiVOLT

Comment: I don't think  arguments apply here. Wikipedia is full of articles about proposed designs for space habitats, alternate methods of transporting goods and passengers for space that remain theoretical, etc. I'm not convinced of its notability or lack thereof, but that's what should determine if the page is kept or not, in my view
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: to Robert L. Forward. The question is not whether it has been or will be built, or how many Google hits it gets, or whether Wikipedia editors think is is feasible or even a horrible idea. The question is whether it has substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, or in respected refereed scientific journals, since it is a scientific/engineering proposal, to satisfy |notability. The proposal seems to lack evidence of independent notability, so merge to the scientist's page. (After we destroy the Van Allen Radiation belt, let's unleash genetically modified disease microorganisms in the world
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)