Deletion of 1983–84 South Midlands League

Comment: Fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: I believe that Number 57 demonstrates this to be ''useful to readers'', that is, having a consistent set of such articles provides reader-friendly and -desired information that would be less convenient anywhere else. Ultimately, despite a bizarre section in a certain essay, this is what all our notability guidelines are intended to be, and indeed the only reason we should do ''anything at all''. Or -- to speak of misapplied essays -- this is exactly the kind of thing the much-misunderstood  says we should have
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: there needs to be a much wider discussion at WT:NSPORTS or WT:FOOTY or somewhere appropriate. I have serious doubts about whether any of the league season articles at this level actually can pass  and nobody has put forward any reasonable argument that they do pass GNG. That being said, deleting one season in the South Midlands League when all the others exist and all the seasons for the other leagues at the same level exist, probably isn't the best way to go about establishing such consensus
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)