Deletion of Deborah Haswell

Comment: Sorry, not notable. The required press coverage just isn't there. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22deborah+haswell%22&btnG=Search+Archives&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=a Google News finds a dead-link story in the Winnipeg Free Press about her being elected; there are also a couple of quotes from her as a councillor in Reliable Sources; but I contend those do not amount to significant coverage. Please read the actual wording of : It grants notability to "Major local political figures '''who have received significant press coverage.'''7 Generally speaking, mayors of cities of at least regional importance '''are likely to''' meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." There is no automatic-notability clause there, it just says that such mayors "are likely to" meet the actual test, which is . And she doesn't meet it, at least not yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: The language in  refers to "mayors of cities of at least regional importance", a statement that is vague enough that it's open to interpretation, with people arguing that the surrounding area is a region.  However, I can't see interpreting the policy to give a free pass to everyone who has ever been the mayor of a county seat.  It doesn't matter that Noq mistakenly referred to an administrative capital.  What he or she argues about London being the city of regional importance in that region holds true.  London, population 350,000.  Owen Sound, population 23,000.  No comparison.  Nothing against Ms. Haswell or against Owen Sound, ON, but if she wouldn't make it in without an elaborate argument about qualifying for automatic inclusion, that's a clue to the non-notability of being the town's mayor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)