Deletion of L'Auberge (restaurant)

Comment: It is clear that an overwhelming majority here thinks that Michelin starred restaurants are plain notable. The nominator ignores the -policy, that he brings in as argument for deletion.  states in his foornotes: '''Inclusion in "best of", "top 100", and similar lists generally does not count towards notability, unless the list itself is so notable that each entry can be presumed notable. Examples of the latter include the Fortune 500 or a Michelin Guide to restaurants.''' But nominator refuses to accept that without usefull reason. This discussion is becoming more and more a joke a should be relieved of its misery by a speedy close as keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: There are sufficient reliable sources to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as author) Revenge nomination. The restaurant was awarded two Michelin stars at the time she went bankrupt. Notability tag appeared already '''1 minute''' after publishing the article. Article does satisfy  as it states in the footnotes ''Inclusion in "best of", "top 100", and similar lists generally does not count towards notability, unless the list itself is so notable that each entry can be presumed notable. Examples of the latter include the Fortune 500 or a Michelin Guide to restaurants
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)