Deletion of Diaper bag

Comment: and just because  exists doesn't mean this should. FWIW, Childbirth is actually sourced, Parenting is a mess and already tagged accordingly. For whatever reason, :Category:Parenting isn't loading for me. But none of that matters here. It's not encyclopedic, it's Dr. Spock whereas someone going to an encyclopedia could be researching childbirth. Note, not associated with any of these articles except for the PROD/AfD here. '''TRAVELLINGCARI
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: but clean up. There are certainly some OR issues, but there is certainly more content than a dicdef that could lend itself to a nice article that is verifiable, if only through about a bajillion parenting books and magazines out there, and just as many patents for diaper bag designs. I'm sure that there are also some scholarly publications that discuss the diaper bag in a sociological context. In the case where there are certainly reliable sources regarding a topic, OR concerns are a |surmountable problem and not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM)