Deletion of Marika Michalowska

Comment: I am not convinced of notability. Laif Magazine has no article, for all we know it could be a zine with 10 issues. http://www.soundrevolt.com/artists-36-en.html soundrevolt.com is an average website, hardly a very reliable source. http://www.angielski.edu.pl/artykuly_z_new_warsaw_express/club_corner_review_of_the_year_18121.html Same applies to this website; http://www.puredjs.com/php/djFlyer.php?ID=178 neither does this one look better. PS. I found two bios in Polish (http://www.djmarika.com/bio.html, http://www.topdj.pl/index.php?biografie=show&ID=873) but neither looks very reliable. Yes, she exists, but I don't see what makes her notable (that said, I don't see what makes any DJ notable... could somebody clarify that per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Barely meets the Ghit test (c. 139 hits), which is no big deal one way or another.  From , she ''appears'' to meet these criteria: she (a) ... has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable. This criterion includes published works in all forms.... (accepted) (b) Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country. (claimed but no proof yet) (c) Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. (claimed and proven) (d) Has won or placed in a major music competition (placed).  Can anyone translate those Polish cites/sites?  I like to see more  in a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: Claim of notability/importance is dependant upon a ranking by Laif Magazine.  Why, then, is Laif not the source for this statement?  We can't just take the word of the provided sources, which are questionable, at best.  The current sources are 1) SoundRevolt.com (no known "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" required per ), 2) a "mention" in New Warsaw Express ( requires "Significant coverage", meaning "that sources address the subject directly in detail") and puredjs.com (apparently a talent agency, which raises POV issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:NPOV)