Deletion of British property bubble

Comment: as I said in my Prod notice: "|original research, completely |unsourced so |unverifiable. Virtually every sentence is stuffed with |weasel words. From the title on down it violates a |neutral point of view at every opportunity. While it might be possible to write a well sourced, neutral article about the British retail property market, you can't get there from here. Much better to delete this and start over". Over a month ago I left a message on the talk page warning that the article needed work and would be proposed for deletion, with no action taken since. I tried pruning it back to verifiable facts and got down to the title, which itself is deeply and irreversibly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WEASEL||WP:NPOV||WP:POV)