Deletion of Pia Arhar

Comment: It's been a week since I posted my previous comment and no one has presented any evidence that shows   is met.  Combined with the fact that my search didn't find significant independent coverage, I don't think finishing 83rd in the world rhythmic gymnastics championships is enough to grant automatic WP notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: It's not too soon--she's 30 years old, so she's not going to get more notable as a gymnast.  More importantly, I have corrected the link to her bio  at the FIG website.  It shows she did compete at the world championships, although she wasn't close to making the finals (which is what the FIG uses to declare someone a "world class gymnast").  The notability criteria at #Gymnastics specifically state the criteria only for artistic gymnasts, not rhythmic ones, so I don't know whether or not the same criteria apply.  Even if the same criteria apply, that only carries a presumption of notability and my search for coverage didn't find enough to show  is met.  However, that doesn't mean Slovenian sources don't exist.  I'm leaning towards a delete, but I am waiting to see the opinions of others now that her results can be viewed by all.  I'll admit I'm far more familiar with martial arts, where just competing at a world championship does not grant notability (even for Olympic sports like judo
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Its 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)