Deletion of Aamer Ijaz

Comment: fails . Is this is even a serious article? The existence of a sportsman regardless of their "appearances" in the sport does not = notoriety
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets . Ten days ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: per nom. According to espncricinfo (https://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan/content/player/598980.html here), he appeared in four first-class matches (12/28/12-2/21/13) and eight T20 matches (all in Sept 2015). However, the article provides ''zero'' sourcing beyond statistical databases. Such databases are insufficient to show that a player passes . The nom's searches (as well as my searches) have turned up ''zero'' in the way of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Moreover, and although this AfD has been relisted twice, allowing time for "Keep" voters to uncover such sourcing, none has been presented. A "Keep" result would merely perpetuate a micro-stub consisting of one line of text sourced to statistical databases. My view is that deletion is the correct result; if significant coverage is later found, there would be no bar to recreating the article at that time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)