Deletion of Gran Logia de la República de Venezuela

Comment: the article does not come close to passing , which repeatedly calls for reliable sources that are independant of the subject to establish notability.  The only source seems to be the organization's own website.  The article ''should'' have been speedy deleted under A7... as it '''does not indicate why the organization is notable or significant''' in any way (the article simply states that the body exists and is based in Caracas, which is not an indication of notability or significance).  I think people are assuming that anything named "Grand Lodge" must be notable.  Some are, but a lot are not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: There seems to be some confusion about  A7 here. Calling yourself "Grand Lodge" doesn't mean it ''must'' be notable, but that's not what CSD is about; calling yourself "Grand Lodge" is an ''assertion'' of notability because it means the organisation is ''claiming'' to be a representative national body. AfD is the appropriate place for this; if the AfD sets a ''clear'' precedent, you can consider  (not CSDA7) on similar articles.&nbsp;–&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:PROD)

Comment: I have no doubt that secondary written sources exist to meet --whether they're accessible to us on the Internet, is, of course, a different matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)