Deletion of Dariusz Ratajczak

Comment: Nsk92, this seems like a "one event" case, which is why I am recommending deletion. A search for news covering him returns many hits, but primarily related to one event, which calls for deletion based on . He does not quality under ; a search on a few academic databases and Google Scholar returned almost no hits (when false positives were removed) and no citations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:PROF)

Comment: Sorry, but are we looking at the same article? This is not a speedy and not a poorly sourced article. The article is already properly sourced to reliable sources and there are quite a few more out there. There is plenty of detailed and specific coverage of the subject, which is spread over a considerable period of time, so that certainly is not a #NEWS case. There are even quite a few books that discuss the subject of this article. Several such books are cited in the article, and there are more in the googlebooks searchhttp://books.google.com/books?q=%22Dariusz%20Ratajczak%22&hl=en&um=1&sa=N&tab=np. Definitely passes  and the negative info in the article is well-sourced, so I do not see compelling BLP grounds for deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BIO)

Comment: per Nsk92 and DGG. A clear keep by  based on sourcing already in article.  No article with as much written elsewhere about the topic, see also gnews, gbooks, should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I wouldn't say it's not notable because it's reliably sourced (with multiple cites), but it may fall within #NEWS. So I'll stay neutral for now until better arguments on either side are offered
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)