Deletion of David L. Epstein

Comment: Doesn't meet  notability standards. &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per . Subject of the article has won a decent award, was previously director of a center at a major university (Columbia qualifies), and has decently high citation counts. Gscholar was frustrating b/c subject has also published under D. Epstein (too many name collisions to analyze) as well as D. L. Epstein, so I turned to ISI Web of Science instead. Restricting to the social science index and limiting to schools where he's been, I get an ISI h-index of 11, with cites of 126, 90, 61, 35, etc (past experience, as well as, say, http://www.harzing.com/papers.htm#gsdemo this paper, suggest that ISI severely undercounts versus Gscholar, our usual rough tool of choice). I conclude from available evidence that the subject means 's criterion 1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: doesn't meet  and the notoriety is momentary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Neither his crime nor his academic work not the combination of the two would appear to satisfy  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . This article is no more than a resume, and the sources (university staff page, a blog, and an association article) don't establish notability. Even his award doesn't have a WP article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Subject of this article meets criteria in  because of the major award mentioned in the third reference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per , non-notable individual who only has an article because they were charged with a crime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)