Deletion of Victimless crime (political philosophy)

Comment: or if necesssary, '''merge''' with Public order crime.  Useful search term that college students would use, useful per , but it's such a poor article, it would be better if sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I don't understand Ultiam's logic; by that argument thousands of Wikipedia articles would be impossible to write. There are thousands of potential sources on Google Scholar alone, suggesting that secondary sources have already defined the parameters of discussion sufficiently to satisfy academic rigor. Obviously there is not going to be one universal definition, but that's why we have |a policy for handling it. Sometimes a crime is implicitly victimless but contains a moral hazard, making "society" (or "us all") the alleged victim. We just have to attribute such categorizations, not decide whether they're right. Certainly the general topic of victimless crime is of encyclopedic notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)