Deletion of A Hat in Time

Comment: as passing  with suitable /RS sources already present in the article with the topic being the subject of the features. I too, don't see how these are unreliable sources. The game is upcoming, yes, but it has already received enough independent source coverage. Purely from editorial stand-point, current sources will be excellent development/history sources once the game is released and properly reviewed. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VG)

Comment: due to significant changes that have taken place in the past week. The current article is no longer a stub as it used to be, and has several sources backing up every major point in the article. There are also no obvious links that could possibly |attract the reader to help support to the game if they wanted to, and the prose has been modified to the extent which I believe fits the |NPOV policy better than before
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ADS||WP:NPOV)