Deletion of Tomasz Kamusella

Comment: I see a pass of  here, with at least three books that are reviewed, one significantly.  (The reviews for two are in the article, there is also this review https://www.jstor.org/stable/24600157 ).  The  case is not so strong as I expected, but I think it's enough to not  the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:TNT)

Comment: per  and the multiple published reviews identified by hroest. I find this argument more convincing than the NPROF argument also made by hroest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The article needs a ''major'' overhaul and is the WP:puffery|puffiest of puff's, and really should be re-written by someone ''other'' than the subject of the article. Oy, why am I not surprised. Anyway, I am of the view that he fails at  but does pass by  per others research, and therefore should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)