Deletion of Mugdha Vaishampayan (2nd nomination)

Comment: I must have missed this one last time around.  The nominator is correct about the promotional tone, but such concern is a |correctable issue and something I have myself begun to address... no, not done yet, but begun.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mugdha_Vaishampayan&action=historysubmit&diff=417224158&oldid=415277754  The subject appears to be creeping up on ,  and , even if not in the United States or in English, and notability to Maharashtra (at nearly 100 million in 2001, the second most populous State in India) is notable enough for en.Wikipedia.  In the spirit of curbing our systemic bias, and as en.Wikipedia does not seem to have many Marathi language|Marathi-reading Wikipedians, I am willing to extend the benefit of the doubt to some of the Marathi language sourceshttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&sa=N&q=%22%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BE+%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%88%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%A8%22 as I work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: for the reasons mentioned last time.  She has competed in a notable competition(placing in the top five even), done a theme song for a notable show, and other things already brought up.  The nominator should not be nominating the same article for deletion again just because he didn't get the results he wanted last time.  9. "Has won or placed in a major music competition." 10. "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. '''a theme for a network television show
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Meets  in my view. And per MichaelQSchmidt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)