Deletion of TeamHealth

Comment: 3Bln in revenue &  meets my personal threshold for corporate notability. The article is not terribly promotional at this time, and sources above are indicative of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)

Comment: Upon further consideration and a review of available sources, this company meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Is is a small leviathan of company, passing  and subsequently the higher standard of .  All these  £5-10billion+ companies are notable. I don't like, but it is the face off it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: The articles posted above which mention TeamHealth do so only as a feature of TeamHealth ''in relation to something else'': be it TeamHealth as a merger partner with ''another'' company; TeamHealth as one of many choices that ''another'' institution — a hospital — seeks to contract with; TeamHealth entering settlement talks with ''other'' partners. In none of the instances provided does TeamHealth stand alone as the '''single subject''' of a notable paper, which would seem to be necessary if it were to garner 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)