Deletion of Paolo Corallini

Comment: I don't see any evidence that he meets any of the notability criteria under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MANOTE)

Comment: The subject of the BLP appears to meet  as the highest ranking in their sport. COI edits, in themselves, are not a reason to delete but a reason to manage the article and potentially take action on the contributor account. Should the sources be found to not verify the facts in the article, then that would be a different reason to delete and I would happily change my opinion on that basis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATH)

Comment: It matches the following criteria http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts, having more than 100 dojos all over is a notability guideline, as signed. Lot of sources are externally available, which is not found on other martial artist's pages...Please verify better. Some pages are still running despite being self published (Hitohiro Saito's pages has no other sources than his website). This page should be improved too, but not deleted. It meets , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BIO WPBIO, and, as formerly noted, it matches these rules too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)WIkipedia notability guideline “The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."1 Notable in the sense of being "famous", or "popular"—although not irrelevant—is secondary”.The relevant profile of this person on an international basis among martial artist shows a public attention worthy to be recorded.Bests  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATH)

Comment: Fails  and I don't think there are sources to show he passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MANOTE||WP:GNG)