Deletion of HAL 9000 in popular culture (3rd nomination)

Comment: The article is |original research by synthesis as there are not reliable third-party sources that treat the topic. In my opinion, the article is a |list of loosely associated topics at best and #OR|primary research at worst. It does not meet the criteria of |verifiability because no sources treat the topic "HAL 9000 in popular culture" and instead the article is an unneeded |content fork composed exclusively of a big |trivia section. Since there are no reliable sources that cover the topic of the article, it does not meet the |general notability guideline and, therefore, there is no valid reason to keep this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:CFORK||WP:TRIV||WP:GNG)

Comment: still no references. Not one. I can understand suggesting we "keep" as a temporary measure give the article time to develop. But what will this develop into aside from either a list with nothing independent to , or a  of the main HAL 9000 with  information about every single damn thing that's ever referred to it? Despite months of protesting otherwise, this article has shown no hope of improvement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:UNDUE||WP:verify notability)

Comment: I think Jfgslo and Shooterwalker have it right. This article is indeed |synthesis because no reliable sources deal with the subject of HAL 9000 in popular culture, and the article is in fact just a big long pointless |trivia section. Despite two previous AfDs, in which the community in good faith has allowed efforts to properly source the article, nothing whatsoever has been done. This must now be taken as evidence that the sources just aren't there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:TRIVIA)