Deletion of List of lead guitarists

Comment: A group of editors"??? = |concensus doesn't it? No article/no inclusion is an excellent rule that should be followed on all lists
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CON)

Comment: If you already knew the guitarist's name, though, you'd simply go to his/her article.  I'd be more convinced by its use if it was in alphabetical list of band.  Also, as regards reasons for deletion, how about #LINK
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: We already have a definition of "|notable" and there is a Wikipedia convention that "List of X" usually means "List of notable X
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:Listcruft is an essay, not a guideline or policy. Also, the only reference to incomplete lists I can find on Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Lists#Incomplete_lists, which ackowledges most lists never will be complete. It says nothing of deleting a list that may never be complete, and instead asks users to insert {{Expand list}} to articles that are in such a state. I am voting for a keep due to the opening rationale, which is , not 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:POLICY)

Comment: First, because a category wouldn't include the bands in which these lead guitarists played, which makes this list already more informative than a category. Second, because it has the potential to be expanded and annotated, see, e.g. List of Electric blues musicians. Third, if this list gets to large to maintain it can be split by either country of origin or genre (blues, rock, heavy metal, etc.). Fourthly, this is not |listcruft as Lead guitar is an encyclopedic topic. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of guitarists and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of women bass guitarists for more arguments for keeping lists similar to this one. See also Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and series boxes which specifically says "''Wikipedia offers three ways to create groupings of articles: Wikipedia:Categorization|categories, Wikipedia:list|lists, and Wikipedia:Article series|article series boxes. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and each is appropriate in different circumstances. These methods should not be considered to be in competition with each other. Rather, they are most effective when used in synergy, each one complementing the other
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: per |no original research, and the fact that it doesn't have any |reliable sources. Also redundant with the category, and list can never conceivability be finished
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:RS)