Deletion of George Kayatta

Comment: Certainly does not pass rof. Eccentrics can be notable but I don't think this one makes it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: It seems that, in order to describe him accurately, we need an article that reads much like an |attack page. For some people (notorious criminals, say) it is justified to have a wholly negative article on them, despite , because that is what they are famous for. But in this case I don't think such an article is justified by the only minor level of notoriety that he has achieved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACK||WP:BLP)

Comment: I see only one paragraph on him in Dudley's book http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HqeoWPsIH6EC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Mathematical+cranks&cd=1#v=onepage&q=Kayatta&f=false. The other mainstream references are even shorter mentions. This article is going to be a never-ending BLP struggle between his self-promotion and reliable sources that present him in a negative light for good reason. He has already spammed three other articles with |unwarranted links to this bio, but I see no article on Wikipedia that will genuinely suffer by the deletion of this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)