Deletion of List of writers in Who's Who in Contemporary Women's Writing

Comment: Wikipedia is not a collection of everything. Lacks notability, the only place this info is found is in the book, there has been no coverage independent of the book so it is not |notable. Also from |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, "articles on works of non-fiction, .... should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents" This is just a summary of the works' contents. Maybe also for copyright issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IINFO)

Comment: The redlinking issue is a red herring. There are many kinds of |selection criteria for lists, and redlinks can always be replaced by ordinary text. Given the title of this article, the appropriate inclusion criterion would be all the names in the Who's Who. However, the book has over 1000 entries, so that would be unwieldy. Perhaps the Who's Who should be used as a reference for a list like List of 20th century women writers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LSC)

Comment: from article space as not claiming notability for the work "Who's Who in Contemporary Women's Writing" or the honour of being included. No  are included. Further, I ask the closing admin to '''Userfy''' the article to my userspace and I'll ensure that all red links are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)