Deletion of Tyrannosaurus in popular culture

Comment: for all the same reasons it was deleted the first time. It's a #DIR|directory of loosely associated topics, a list of "ooh look, a big dinosaur on my TV!" references. The article tells us nothing about the dinosaurs, nothing about the fiction from which the trivia is drawn, nothing about any relationship between them (because there isn't any) and nothing about the world. And as an aside, the notion that editors were unable to consider this article fairly the first time because it was nominated with a handful of similar articles is ludicrous on its face and insulting to editors' intelligence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: As I stated in the group AfD, articles '''should''' be deleted if they aren't notable and '''shouldn't''' be deleted just because it's poorly written (As per ). I don't think anyone can debates that T rex and its depiction in Popular culture aren't notable, so I see no reason as to why it should be deleted. In fact I don't know why it was in the first case, seeing as there was a large consensus ''not'' to delete this particular article in the group AfD. With a bit of hard work (And possibly a name change as noted on the  talk page and previously in the afd which started all this, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lions in popular culture) this article could be greatly improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:RUBBISH||WP:DINO)