Deletion of Jeeva Samadhi

Comment: The second and third line of the article ''can'' provide a starting point for an article, but the rest of it is plain op-eds introduced by different editors. At this point, this article does more to misinform readers than any encyclopaedic purpose. Even if refs are found (and they can be found deeply embedded in scholarly works) the article needs to be written from scratch, not from a smorgasbord of opinions and listings dubiously sourced.  applies. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)