Deletion of London Buses route 123

Comment: to List of London bus routes, per  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTROUTINE)

Comment: Redirect''' per . There is a distinct lack of sources to indicate independent notability, fails . The redirect to the list article works fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:GNG)

Comment: It's easy to find more coverage such as https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Today_s_London_Buses/h9MoEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=bus+123+wood+green+ilford&pg=PA275&printsec=frontcover this account of its special service on its 50th anniversary.  Our policy  therefore applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: As per nomination, and specifically as per . Wikipedia is not a bus timetable service. The edit warring and adjacent tomfoolery also suggests we've entered the realm of the unnecessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: to List of bus routes in London, as was previously done. Fails , and as per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: Came here from ANI, in case anyone's wondering. There's not enough independent coverage of this route for it to qualify for a stand-alone article. (In terms of the canvassing thing, I think it's obviously inappropriate per 's bit here: {{tq|In the case of a re-consideration of a previous debate (such as a "no consensus" result on an RFC, AFD or CFD), it is similarly inappropriate to send a disproportionate number of notifications specifically to those who expressed a particular viewpoint on the previous debate.}} but there's also a high likelihood these users would have stumbled upon this article in the first place, so I'm really not that fussed
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:VOTESTACK)

Comment: with a bit of '''merge''' (came from the ANI too). The topic fails . No objection to merging nor to soft deletion by redirecting without any hard deletion involved
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)