Deletion of Shittymorph

Comment: Per reasons above. Article is good enough to pass  with the sources indicated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This one is borderline but the arguments for deletion appear more cogent. Yes, the articles in CNET constitute significant coverage in a reliable and independent source.  calls for multiple sources of this kind. It may be thought that the host of sources about his participation in the beta testing are enough to satisfy this. I don't think so: they all have largely the same content and are clearly not intellectually independent of each other (which is also called for in ). They also don't meet the bar for significant coverage. In general, the abundance of sources on this one aspect makes me think the article could also fall under . To sum up: the subject fails /
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: There are two interesting things here - that the meme keeps the match fresh in people's memories, and that Reddit implemented a tipping feature.  Therefore, I merged some of this relevant content to Reddit#Other features and a new section I created called Hell in a Cell#In popular culture.  I'm a bit torn which should be the redirect though.  My initial thinking is to send the redirect to the Hell in a Cell content, since Chris' initial notability was established by his meme, not the tipping. If the tipping takes off and coverage expands listing him as the first beneficiary, I could be persuaded to change this opinion. Until then, it's a bit  to make Reddit the redirect. Cheers
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I fail to see why this doesn't clearly qualify as  at best. Nobody has even made a case for significant coverage in reliable/independent sources other than for Shittymorph's role as the test user for a Reddit feature. Why not just include the information about Shittmorph in the appropriate section of the Reddit page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I'm seeing lots of opinions here, but not RS that justify a WP page about the subject. The tipping articles merit inclusion in the Reddit page, perhaps even a whole section, but not an article about the Reddit user used in the tipping experiment. This seems at best 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: the user is well known enough to get non-trivial RS https://www.cnet.com/news/reddit-memes-hell-in-a-cell/ like CNET. We cannot dismiss the  of this person even if we want to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)