Deletion of Hailey Dunn

Comment: Per editor just above me. This kind of event is always going to receive significant coverage for a time. We can't have articles about all of them. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and . These are tragic events, but such tragic events happen every day and are reported every day in reliable news sources. This does not usually render the victims notable. In the case of , I think persistence in sources is key. For the sake of the subject, let's hope we're dealing with BLP here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENTS)

Comment: per nom etc. Sadly, cases like this are rarely of great long-term significance, except to those involved. And yes, there were serious issues with the 'investigation' section too. I think the article creator should familiarise him/herself with core  policy before writing any more articles on similar topics - this type of article (even if meeting Wikipedia notability guidelines) needs a great deal of care to avoid implications that are unjustified, and negative portrayal of individuals that have had no part in the case itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per  and per nom. http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&hl=en&gl=uk&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=%22Hailey+Dunn%22 Google News has very few hits - I count 13, though YMMV. I see no points of notability and very great  risk for others named in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM||WP:BLP)