Deletion of Andar Char

Comment: I agree. I could not find meaningful sources on this either and based off https://goo.gl/maps/3CrYYgeUiy62hVZEA google maps this seems like it's simply a tiny region and not a significant location. It meets neither  nor Wikipedia:Notability (Geographic locations). Seems very cut and dry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Clearly a recognised settlement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: It does appear to be a legally recognized populated place, given its listing in census documents (https://books.google.com/books?id=pLlGsDq4MgEC&q=%22andar+char%22&dq=%22andar+char%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&printsec=frontcover&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBiafrgLzxAhXglWoFHW3oAcUQ6AEwBHoECAkQAg This one, for example), although I can only view them through Google Books snippet view so I can't tell what those documents are saying about the place. Besides that, https://books.google.com/books?id=NKjYAAAAMAAJ&q=%22andar+char%22&dq=%22andar+char%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&printsec=frontcover&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBiafrgLzxAhXglWoFHW3oAcUQ6AEwBXoECAoQAg this source from 1932, also from snippet view describes it as an island serving as "a centre of fish-trade", and https://www.google.com/books/edition/Land_Solutions_for_Climate_Displacement/v9OhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22andar+char%22&pg=PA139&printsec=frontcover this one lists it as an island as well as further describing what a "char" is. Those aren't exactly significant coverage, but they could help flesh out the article a little. Altogether it looks like this place just barely squeaks by due to  but I'm fine keeping based on that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: per  point one, "''Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable.''" We know it http://archive.thedailystar.net/newDesign/print_news.php?nid=242116 exists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Appears in http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/PopCen2011/COMMUNITY_Patuakhali.pdf Bangladeshi census documents as Under Char (eg p.50), which has 466 households, 2,173 people and thus easily meets GEOLAND. Please take the following as a comment made in good faith: in general a  process here would include a search of the appropriate census data, not just "quick" Google searching. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per . It is legally recognized, and is therefore notable. The "delete" voteseem to be unaware of the guideline. Sources likely exist in Bangladesh
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)