Deletion of Javi du art

Comment: Falls some way short of notability. Exhibiting at this fair does not go far, nor a news story centred on his age not his art. Creator seems to have  issues on his own admission
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: reply|Jonnyplaxo}} No, I haven't "gone back and forth". The point of the discussion at hand is whether javi du art is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. There are very clear guidelines as to what should be covered (see ,  and ). du art meets none of these criteria. Artist ''might'' be notable if they have exhibited at a major show (something like the Vienna Biennale). So, since du art has exhibited at Art Palm Beach, we need to evaluate whether that is a major show on the order of the Vienna Biennale. The sources provided do not indicate that it is such. So we are left with an artist who doesn't meet the criteria, because the one show he has exhibited at does not meet the criteria. Done and done. I've said enough at this point. I'll leave the discussion to others
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Whether or not the comment is corrected, the significance of the Art Palm Beach show is not established by any |reliable sources so du art's showing there has no verifiable significance. The fact that the show exhibits galleries around the world may simply mean that galleries around the world wish to sell their art to the well-heeled Palm Beach residents. But there is no indication that this show has any particular standard for accepting any particular art. It may well, but we have no way of knowing without a reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: A textbook case of  and trying to build notability with a Wikipedia article. This does not satisfy  or . If and when multiple, non-trivial sources become available the article can be recreated. It's not Wikipedia's responsibility to introduce an artist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: ping|Jonnyplaxo}} P.S. |The existence of other bad articles is a bad argument for the retention of this article. But thanks for pointing that article out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: ping|Jonnyplaxo}} As an "official dealer and representative of du art" you should familiarize yourself with |Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Your purpose in creating this article (presumably to |promote your client) does not mesh with Wikipedia's purpose of presenting a |neutral presentation of notable and |verifiable facts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SPAM||WP:NPOV||WP:V)

Comment: even the ''Sun Sentinel'' ref headlines with the fact that he has only just sold his first piece of art - dated 2015 and presumably from other clues, that is April 2015 - not yet a month old! Sorry but this is way |too soon '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)