Deletion of SafeBreach

Comment: The sources used are mostly press releases, which per  are not true RS. Plus looking at the creators contribution history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/CyC28, he has only created this page and the founders page, leading me to believe we have some  here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:NEWSORG||WP:COI)

Comment: per  -- just another cybersecurity tech company going about its business. The tone is promotional and the article cited to churnalism-like sources: about funding, product launches etc. This content belongs on the company web site, not in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Likely  but not overly promotional. Despite the large number of reference about funding, there are three that pass  - https://www.scmagazine.com/safebreach-continuous-security-validation-platform/article/530355/ SC Magazine (written by the editor), http://www.networkworld.com/article/3026525/security/security-startup-wages-continuous-war-games-against-networks.html Network World (written by the site's senior editor), and http://venturebeat.com/2016/07/26/safebreach-raises-15m-to-test-companies-cybersecurity-smarts-from-a-hackers-perspective/ Venture Beat (written by staff writer). None are press release reprints from what I can tell. The headline for Venture Beat is about funding but it details more about the company in the article than it does about funding. Other reliable sources are Haaretz and Globes which as pointed out above would not publish promotional content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:GNG)