Deletion of Selcovia

Comment: This particular string of letters has http://www.google.com/#q=Selcovia&hl=en&safe=off&nfpr=1&prmd=ivns&ei=ySVJTYKgBoKglAftyJnWDw&start=90&sa=N&fp=3b15e1a9e1579b3b 83 Google hits, including Wikipedia and its mirrors. Utterly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: It's noticeable that there is nothing in http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=Selcovia&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdtf=&as_sdts=5&hl=en Scholar. The sources that I can find all use much the same language, suggesting a common origin, and even http://www.earlybritishkingdoms.com/bios/senylsv.html  they say only that one Senyllt: "''appears to have become king of the region around Selkirkshire where the people were known as the Selgovae. Although the name of his kingdom is unknown, for identification purposes, the Latin 'Selcovia,' would seem appropriate.''" A name |made up one day because it "would seem appropriate" is not a good enough foundation for a Wikipedia article. Per  we would need evidence that it was a widely accepted term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:NEO)

Comment: Multiple attempts to find |reliable sources to |verify this article have drawn a blank.  If not a hoax, it is at the least deeply non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)