Deletion of Men Going Their Own Way

Comment: or '''Redirect''' per Cailil.  I don't feel there are enough reliable sources on the subject to support a non-stubby article of its own.  Previous versions were a mess of |original research, relying heavily on cites to blogs, youtube videos, and other low-quality |unreliable sources; looking over it, it also looks like it cited the same few sources and people over and over.  When you trim it down to what's usable, there's enough to cover a mention on Men's rights movement or manosphere, but not really enough to give it its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: has been covered in reliable sources, although this article is already becoming an dit war|edit warzone so some form of oversight might be needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP: E)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The movement meets , though without the propaganda and the POV positioning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As the creator of the article, I am not interested in having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW ''just for the sake of having a Wikipedia article about MGTOW''. If the article does not ''correctly'' and ''completely'' explain MGTOW, detail the various gradations within MGTOW, and contrast it with unrelated men's groups, explain its ''equivalence'' with the herbivore men, and its equivalence with the marriage strike/boycott, then I don't even see the point in having an article.  If it makes any difference, the near-consensus of the MGTOW outside Wikipedia with whom I've discussed this is agreement with my '''delete''' vote here.  Editors who know nothing about the subject have somehow decided that MGTOW has nothing to do with the herbivore men, or with the marriage strike/boycott, even though ''MGTOW themselves'' and ''Herbivores themselves'' (such as  Kyojiro Kagenuma) disagree.  The Helen Smith book is an excellent source, but you have decided that it cannot be allowed.  The majority of the Google News articles are useless and only show up in the search results because someone mentioned MGTOW in their comment sections. The fact that you have removed everything from the article ''except'' "'''criticisms of MGTOW'''" is clear example of  weight, intended to make it appear&nbsp;as if MGTOW are merely "https://www.mgtow.com/shaming-tactics/ men who whine about women on the internet".  You also do ''not'' consider Milo Yiannopoulos to be a reliable source (but ''do'' consider the VICE article to be a reliable source, even though the latter is clearly a poorly researched, heavily biased journalistic hatchet job, intended to mock MGTOW with  phrases such as "those tricky, tricky women"). If all this is the case, I instead prefer to wait several years, after a number of books about MGTOW have been written (as I expect), to make any Wikipedia article about MGTOW, or not to have an article at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: in its earlier and longer version it easily met  as a notable topic, with many third party refs cited. It needs restoring to a more complete version such as https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Men_Going_Their_Own_Way&oldid=697570742 this version and then fixing any remaining issues, not cutting out almost all the text and then noming for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It's rough right now but clearly passes , which is all that really matters. Let it grow as good sources become available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject is clearly notable, as defined by being the topic of multiple news items from , as a Google News search will show. The article in its current form still needs substantial changes to meet Wikipedia's  and citation rules. It will, however, require quite rigorous and thorough editing to achieve those standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NPOV)