Deletion of Chrismukkah (2nd nomination)

Comment: There's clearly very significant coverage about the day, in addition to the above coverage, there are mentions in major sources like https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2012/12/12/merry-chrismukkah ''The Economist'', Nathenson, Cary. "Chrismukkah as Happy Ending?: The Weihnukka Exhibition at the Jewish Museum Berlin as German-Jewish Integration Fantasy." Journal of Jewish Identities, vol. 6 no. 1, 2013, p. 57-69. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/jji.2013.0005., not to mention a spate of coverage in newspapers as the holiday comes around pretty much every year. This level of sourcing clearly indicates a pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily meets . Tons of available significant coverage: https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Chrismukkah%22, https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Chrismukkah%22+-wikipedia, https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Chrismukkah%22+-wikipedia, https://cse.google.com/cse?hl=en&cx=007734830908295939403:galkqgoksq0&cof=FORID:13%3BAH:left%3BCX:Wikipedia%2520Reference%2520Search&q=%22Chrismukkah%22, https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=010426977372765398405:3xxsh-e1cp8&hl=en. Nominator clearly did not do  (plus it already passed a previous AfD with flying colors) and this is simply an  nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Meets the general notability guidelines.  Nominator once again refuses to follow .  Just click the Google news search for it and look through the results
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)