Deletion of Quidco

Comment: Quidco, were the first cashback website to introduce 100% cashback, most cashback websites at the time offered 50%. On purchases such as mobile phoneshttp://www.quidco.com/3-mobile/ this was a considerate saving. This created a trend, as rivals, most notably, rpoints tried to compete by offering a http://www.rpoints.com/highestcashback/reasons.php 'Highest Cashback Promise, and http://www.freefivers.co.uk FreeFivers who created a new website, http://www.cashbackjunction.com/ The Cashback Junction. The effect quidco had is also reflected in Alexa rankings, who now report quidco as recieving more traffic http://www.cashbacknews.co.uk/2007/04/cashback-site-chart-apr-2007.html than rpoints. So even without the biased media on the company, it is notable because of the effect it had on companies and on an industry which is notable, per guidelines on  ''Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice ... Large organizations are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Among the three provided sources, only one can be considered as a source to determine notability.  One is a press release by the company, and the other is the company website.  Since an extensive search does not yield additional sources, nor are any asserted by the article, it fails /, as lacking "multiple" non-trivial independant sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:WEB)