Deletion of The Great Meme War

Comment: per the sources on the article, passes . I will expand further today because there is more reliable sources. I would also like to point out there is some interest in an article like this, within less than a single day it has received https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=The_Great_Meme_War| Almost 700 unique visits(On the first of January 2017, it recived almost 8,000 clicks, 8x more than John Kanisch), which is massive, and within it's first day its almost ahead of popular politicians like John Kasich for daily views. This should definitely be considered in this discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Users using the rational that it should be deleted because it is a "joke" should be discounted per , to quote the page: ''"The terms "unencyclopedic", and its flip-side "encyclopedic", are too general to be useful in deletion discussions. What we need to know are the specific reasons why the article should or should not be included. Otherwise, you just leave us guessing as to what you meant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC)

Comment: or redirect) per Timothyjosephwood. A couple of short, borderline-reliable sources and passing mentions in some other sources are not enough to demonstrate the significant coverage needed to pass . At most, this could be redirected to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 or some other relevant article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject meets basic 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)