Deletion of Gran Meliá Ghoo

Comment: Meets , albeit on a weak basis, from sources that I was able to find online: http://loffit.abc.es/business-club/news/melia-anuncia-el-primer-cinco-estrellas-internacional-en-iran-235629/ "Meliá anuncia el primer cinco estrellas internacional en Irán". ''ABC (newspaper)|ABC''. {{In lang|es}}, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-02/iran-to-get-luxury-hotel-on-caspian-sea-as-tourist-market-thaws "Iran to Get Luxury Hotel Along Caspian Sea as Tourism Thaws". Bloomberg News., http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/middle-east/iran/articles/melia-to-open-irans-first-international-five-star-hotel/ "The luxury hotels luring Western tourists to Iran". ''The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph''., http://www.citmagazine.com/article/1385999/gran-melia-open-first-hotel-iran "Gran Meliá to open first hotel in Iran". ''Conference & Incentive Travel''. (http://shop.haymarket.com/cit/citw11/ A paid subscriber magazine). It's likely that additional reliable sources are available in Media of Iran|Iranian news media sources, which may not be readily available or easy to access in some western and other countries. Per this, also keep in the interests of countering Wikipedia:Systemic bias|systemic bias on Wikipedia (See Wikipedia:Systemic bias#Availability of sources may cause bias|Availability of sources may cause bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: re|Arthistorian1977}} How does the article have a "clearly promotional tone". As written at the time it was nominated here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gran_Meli%C3%A1_Ghoo&diff=713774471&oldid=713761755 diff), it is quite neutrally worded, and has no promotional context or tone, peacock language, language extolling its virtues or how great it is, etc. It reads as an entirely neutrally-worded article that simply summarizes the topic. Regarding the notion of "non existing property" in the nomination, this is not a valid rationale for deletion; notable construction developments are allowed to be covered in the encyclopedia. See also: 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:DEFUNCTS)