Deletion of Solium

Comment: Almost every article about a business involves an interview of someone at that business.  That doesn't mean that it fails .  https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/investment-ideas/solium-capital-expands-its-global-network-with-shareworks-software/article22032053/ This Globe and Mail article I quoted has several negative statements about Solium (e.g. "New investors in the small-cap stock should expect a stretch of earnings volatility", "Building international market share has been slow", "And spending the money required to raise that global profile and secure future growth is weighing on financial results in the interim.")  It is not just a re-released press release, it is an in-depth article about the company in a national newspaper.  The original Globe+Mail article also has negative statements about the company (e.g. "Solium was struggling until 2003
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: No indications of notability and promo copy, including a catalogue of products. Sourcing is PR-driven /  / etc. Fails  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: still "Delete" per  / : there's nothing in the article that's ''not'' promotional. Just a listing of deal announcements, office openings, etc. No prejudice to recreation if can be done in a neutral fashion by a volunteer editor. Let's not encourage spammers by keeping such promotional articles. Also see : using up volunteer time to fix up articles like this only leads to more spam
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:PROMO||WP:BOGOF)

Comment: The Calgary Herald articles are not just press releases, and the Calgary Herald is certainly a reliable source.  The Globe and Mail article is not a press release either.  Look, most business articles are very flattering to the companies they discuss - reliable sources don't have to be neutral.  Also, this is not the best-written article, but it seems to meet  through the Herald+Globe and Mail articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I agree this meets  through the Herald+Globe and Mail articles. In the tech space TechCrunch is a reliable source. It is very difficult to get coverage by TechCrunch and any company that does is at least noteworthy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)