Deletion of Daoud Bokhary

Comment: I agree with Cullen328's rationale that the interview by The Standard qualifies as an independent reliable source. An interview is a biography, and if the interviewer qualifies as an independent interviewer writing for a reliable source, the interview is an independent reliable biography. Although the other cited sources did not discuss Daoud in lengthy detail, the mere fact that Daoud is mentioned in many newspaper reports concerning his relatives' incidents means that Daoud is himself a noteworthy person. From #Basic criteria, ''If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability''. I think Daoud's case fall into this category and his article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Sources cited are sufficient to demonstrate notability. As Cullen328 correctly points out, a source does not need to be ''solely'' devoted to a topic to establish a presumption of notability for the topic, merely to cover the topic in more than a trivial fashion. : "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material". "significant, interesting, or unusual" are subjective judgments; if I may be permitted to quote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)