Deletion of Nisha JamVwal

Comment: It seems to be the case of  (as nominator suggested) as well as https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nisha_JamVwal&oldid=619118908 previous CSD nomination should be considered. And even I am failed to find significant coverage in free media (should not consider if it is my personal views
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Yes that is were I'm concerned, the article must stand on |reliable hird party|third party independent sources, which unfortunately this article don't have. And I'm more worried to know that the author has close relation with the subject ( & ). Chintan, although I can understand that the provided informations might be correct but as I said, here self |promotion and since you know the subject  will interfere. And Wikipedia is |not a blog or free hosting website. Here subject should pass our . And an article only passes notability if the subject has |verifiable |inline hird party|third party |reliable sources. Bollywood hungama and Shiksha.com are not reliable.  In addition please carefully read |this and |this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:T||WP:COI||WP:PROMO||WP:PROMO||WP:COI||WP:NOTBLOG||WP:GNG||WP:VERIFY||WP:INLINE||WP:T||WP:RS||WP:COI||WP:ADVERT)