Deletion of Diana Madison

Comment: I've added additional references and information to the article. This subject passes  for significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.https://people.com/style/glam-masters-diana-madison-interview/https://www.usmagazine.com/stylish/news/maternity-tips-diana-madison-tells-fashion-tricks/http://hauteliving.com/hautebeauty/tv-personality-diana-madison-glam-masters-working-kim-kardashian/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/tvshowbiz/video-1620982/Video-Charlotte-Mckinney-chats-Diana-Madison-beauty-tips.htmlhttps://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/diana-madison-amanda-bynes-134626http://www.thisisinsider.com/glam-masters-kim-kardashian-winner-2018-2https://www.huffingtonpost.com/laura-dunn/women-in-business-diana-m_b_5481289.html Her show ''Glam Masters'' (which she is the executive producer of) is a reality beauty competition show on Lifetime that she does with Kim Kardashian. Along with producing a beauty show, the article in the Insider literally has the title (referring to Diana Madison), "Kim Kardashian's makeup artists are so famous that people are fighting to join her glam squad" which I think is an indicator that Madison is extremely notable for her profession. Someone mentioned that interviews don't count to establish notability. There is nothing about interviews on  or , which are the official guidelines on notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PERSON||WP:N)

Comment: sources in the article and offered at this AfD are passing mentions and , such as interviews, which are not suitable for determining notability. Does not meet  based on a review of available sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I agree with DGG on his assessment of the sourcing, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)