Deletion of Vincent Caso

Comment: Both Simonm and Otterathome seem to think that failing  means that a subject is not notable. This is a not true.  clearly states: "''A topic is presumed to be notable enough to merit an article if it meets the general notability guidelines below. A topic '''can also be''' considered notable if it meets the criteria outlined in one of the more subject-specific guidelines''". As Rogerborg has said, the subject meets (just about) . As  states that meeting "one of the more subject-specific guidelines" (such as ) makes a subject notable it is obvious that the subject is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: Notability is established by non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable, third-party sources. I don't see any sources in this article that satisfy . If these are found and added then I will reconsider my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I agree it is a borderline case; however, under ntertainer A subject is notable if they have a large 'cult' following. The Guild and Vincent Caso both fall under this I believe. Large online fan base, they were the toast of ComicCon and Blizzcon, I believe that qualifies as a large cult following. Also, WP:Del says that deference should be given to stub articles because of the ability to improve upon them. Also, for completion sake the article should not be deleted since it would create a hole (a dead link to a major player) in the Guild coverage. Lastly, rather then simply turning the page into a redirect as otterathome did unilaterally perhaps the material could be merged into another article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E)

Comment: lacks the necessary |reliable sources which establish that this person is |notable, i.e., which cover him in depth. I note without prejudice that this article could easily be merged to The Guild. I also note that this nomination seems quite ed, and would suggest that any further contributors consider the article on its merits, rather than the nominator on his merits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:POINT)