Deletion of Hodgson's paradox

Comment: Could someone with knowledge of probability (and preferably access to the cited sources) review this? It seems like  but I would prefer to hear an (uninvolved) expert opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I've looked them both up, and although I am not an expert in probability theory, I am know a little (which is enough to settle this matter). You see, it's not the probability theory that's in question: it's the  and  concerns. Neither reference establishes that this is a paradox, or that Hodgson is necessarily the one who discovered it. Munley's note states that Hodgson "pointed out that X/Y has Cauchy distribution with neither defined mean or variance" (ie pointed out something that was already well known). Munley's note is, actually, a good source for the fact that there are often other ways to characterize these troublesome distributions (he gives an example and explanation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: per nom and specifically per . No evidence that this is a paradox, no use of "Hodgson's paradox" in mathematical literature, no nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)