Deletion of GH avisualagency™

Comment: See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per nomination. See . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tom_harrison Tom Harrison
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Was going to do weak delete, but changed my mind after reviewing  (although only a proposed guideline). Would like to say delete because of business's clear keep campaign primarily for purposes of advertising. Although it possibly comes close to notability according to the article's contents (which needs major cleaning up and de-advertising), it only does so by association with bigger names and has no notability in its own right (except that of a conference whose name is misspelt in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: as while GHava is a business, they are also a legitimate artist collective whose work (individually and as a group) is widely recognized beyond their commercial output - Art_gallery|gallery shows (most recently at the 222 Gallery in Philadelphia, books and Art_magazines|art magazines, etc.  I would argue that GH deserve a Wikipedia article on that basis, and should be considered not just on the grounds of  but in the more general ideas of otability, erifiability, mportance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:V||WP:I)

Comment: This company is a pivotal creative collective that has influenced artists all over the world. Their monograph is held in the highest esteem by and is in the literary collections of such prestigious institutions as the Tate Gallery in London as well as the Museum of Modern Art in NYC. In fact, it was selected as staff pick by MOMA. It is also in the library of the Atlanta College of Art. not once in the  does it ever state that "< 1K results" on google is a criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)