Deletion of List of heavy equipment equivalents

Comment: Lists of equipment models for ''individual'' manufacturers are accepted as uncontroversial facts, including for some of the same manufacturers mentioned in this stub, with examples at List of Caterpillar Inc. machines; List of John Deere tractors; Komatsu Limited#Komatsu America Models .5B8.5D|Komatsu America Models.  An article which correlates those various models ''across manufacturers'' would be useful new content.  Unfortunately, the current article is just cut-and-paste from an external Web page (archived https://web.archive.org/web/20130826120830/http://erbequipment.com/rental/comparisons.htm here).  Besides the possibility of (technical) bias as coming from a single source, the lists are incomplete, such as including Caterpillar Caterpillar D7|D7 and Caterpillar D8|D8 but not Caterpillar D9|D9 or Caterpillar D11|D11.  A good article would explain the similarities rather than just listing model numbers, not just &ldquo;''A'' &asymp; ''B''&rdquo;, but more like &ldquo;''A'' and ''B'' both use one-ton-class high-temperature turboencabulators&rdquo;.  Obviously this is not yet such an article, but there is |potential.  If someone is willing to adopt the article, I would suggest |userfy it.  Special:Contributions/50.181.30.121|50.181.30.121
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:USERFYIT)