Deletion of Charlene McArthur Albarran

Comment: Neither winning a state-level beauty pageant nor running for congress is enough to establish notability.  I find all the "in depth" coverage cited above is just routine coverage of her announcement that she was running for office.  This does not get her past . If she wins the election, or if there was something unusual to happen during the campaign then she would become notable.  But at the present time, this is routine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sources http://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/8841-charlene-albarran-s-address-conundrum in-depth and http://www.sltrib.com/home/3487088-155/park-city-democrat-charlene-albarran-to in-depth and http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865649871/Rep-Chris-Stewart-Charlene-Albarran-file-to-run-in-Utahs-2nd-District.html?pg=all in-depth and http://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/10554-poll-rep-chris-stewart-leads-democrat-charlene-albarran-by-29-points mention and http://www.ourmidland.com/news/article/Herbert-Weinholtz-to-speak-at-AARP-campaign-9195232.php mention and http://kuer.org/post/charlene-albarran-rep-chris-stewart-file-utahs-2nd-congressional-district#stream/0 in-depth and http://kutv.com/news/local/rep-stewart-russia-will-try-and-manipulate-us-elections four paragraphs here and http://www.parkrecord.com/news/park-city/park-city-democrat-launches-congressional-campaign-outside-home-district/ in-depth and http://kuer.org/post/democrat-charlene-albarran-challenge-congressman-chris-stewart#stream/0 in-depth and http://www.thespectrum.com/story/news/2016/02/26/albarran-taking-stewart-utahs-2nd-district/81006972/ in-depth. So contrived non-rules like 'candidates only notable if elected' don't apply when the |general notability guideline is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If I discount the expected (local) coverage of the election, I don't see anything that is left to pass GNG. (Note that POLOUTCOMES exists because otherwise every candidate would inherit notability from the coverage about the election. This is important per  - Wikipedia cannot become a directory of election candidates) As for the coverage about the Miss USA - that is firstly a primary source. Secondly, assuming that there was "nationwide coverage" goes against . Who knows, maybe the TV just showed a 5 second glimpse of her among other candidates? Note that she didn't win the competition. This is not convincing enough to be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTABILITYISNOTCONJECTURED)