Deletion of Kevin Deutsch

Comment: albeit with some reluctance.  (I was the one who said the above quote and brought this to ANI originally...  and maybe I'll regret this !vote if the POV-pushing edit war continues eternally.)  Deutsch doesn't qualify as a Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual|low-profile individual - he's self-promoted himself, he's written books & done book signing & self-promotion events, etc.  So while his "normal" journalism career is of no importance as far as sources are concerned, his work as an author is of borderline notability, and the scandal was large and long-running enough as to not be a  issue.  (It also involved more than just the book...  it also tainted the journalism career, with editor's notes and redactions being made retroactively to articles he wrote.  So the SCANDAL was notable if not the career itself.)  The fact that the scandal originally broke in March 2017, and has kept rolling since then with things like http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/inside-the-fake-news-story-no-ones-talking-about-w475648 this April 2017 Rolling Stone article or https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/a-journalist-on-the-crime-beat-becomes-the-subject-of-some-skeptical-journalism/2017/09/15/c5139096-9711-11e7-82e4-f1076f6d6152_story.html this September 2017 Washington Post story, which are willing to make comparisons with notable-for-the-wrong-reasons journalists like Jayson Blair, also shows that the issue has legs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per .  He probably meets , it probably isn't , and it probably doesn't contain personal attacks, but all are borderline.  Given the long-standing battle-ground nature and  sourcing of the article, the encyclopedia is better off without it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: The subject meets , per a review of available sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)