Deletion of Johannes Cabal the Necromancer

Comment: Actually appears to have been reviewed by at least a couple reliable sources. http://www.zone-sf.com/wordworks/johancab.html This review at ''The Zone'' (operated by genre book publisher Pigasus Press, complete with http://freespace.virgin.net/pigasus.press/guidelines.html submissions guidelines and editorial oversight) offers a mixed opinion of the work. The review by the historically well-respected Kirkus Reviews is https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/jonathan-l-howard/johannes-cabal/ not at all positive. The book has been reviewed elsewhere as well; http://www.fantasybookreview.co.uk/Jonathan-L-Howard/Johannes-Cabal-the-Necromancer.html Fantasy Book Review was more positive, and http://fantasy-faction.com/2014/johannese-cabal-the-necromancer-review Fantasy-Faction offered glowing praise. Both those reviews are bylined, but I'm not certain about the editorial control or |overall reliability of either site; regardless, ''The Zone'' and Kirkus are clearly acceptable sources, and that gets us over the threshold
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)