Deletion of Transcendental Meditation research

Comment: It is a well sourced document that uses primarily secondary sources. The suggestion that it is a POV fork is erroneous as well as the suggestion it does not conform to  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:SCIRS)

Comment: There's clearly an issue with excessive |content forking in the Transcendental Meditation topic area, not to mention a |walled garden problem. We somehow manage to cover all of the research on broad topics like hypertension or acute myeloid leukemia without a spinoff article, so I'm not sure we need one here, where there's very little high-quality research to speak of. Parts of the article should be merged to Transcendental Meditation (or Transcendental Meditation technique? or Transcendental Meditation movement? Again, ''way'' too much content forking
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:WG)

Comment: as an unnecessary fork of Transcendental Meditation technique and other existing TM articles. It is clear that Transcendental Meditation is a notable topic, but Transcendental Meditation research is not notable as a distinct topic: I can find zero reliable sources where "Transcendental Meditation research" is the subject of a sentence. A '''merge to Research on meditation''' is also possible, but less desirable, given the  and  problems here. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.15.147|101.119.15.147
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:SCIRS)

Comment: Notability seems clear per my comment above and after looking at the sources I find a distinct ''lack'' of primary sources and news reports and instead I see highly compliant research reviews being used per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)