Deletion of Chris Darwin

Comment: The article is a grab bag, failing to assert how Chris Darwin is ''notable.''  I quote : "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia."  Thus, a list of trivialities, such as we have here, even when gaining passing mention in , does not add up to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:RS)

Comment: I've just taken a little time and made substantial revisions to the article in an attempt to bring it more in line with encyclopedic tone standards, as well as focusing on what particular efforts of Chris Darwin's have been the source of significant coverage (mostly his charity/nature advocacy work). Curious to see if the revision has any material effect on anyone's opinions.As for the request, would it be possible to |userfy this article if consensus is to delete at this point? I think there's a more than passable article to be had here, given the sourcing available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY)

Comment: This person has not been subject to significant coverage directly and in detail. So they fail . Obviously
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)