Deletion of Slender Man (2nd nomination)

Comment: The notability guidelines mention the requirement for ''multiple'' independent reliable sources - this has ''one'' (I note that the above sources would not appear to meet the |reliable source criteria). I couldn't find any more when I searched, and so I feel that this subject fails to meet the criteria for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per WP:RECENTISM and WP:GNG. No assertion of notability in multiple independent reliable sources. Only one decent source, the Star-Tribune story, and since Wikipedia is not a newspaper, that's not the best source on internet memes. None of the other sources meet the standard for . Not impressed with the assertions for keeping or the links provided above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS)

Comment: Unfortunately, it appears to fail the |general notability guideline, which applies to |fictional characters, as well. While I appreciate sites like ED (or whatever it is now) and KYM, they do not fit Wikipedia's definition of |reliable sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FICTION||WP:RS)