Deletion of Albert K. Chin

Comment: The h-index is quite high (above 70, according to GoogleScholar), so arguably satisfies #C1. However, almost all citations appear to be to patents, rather than to research publications, which is an unusual situation for . Probably should be evaluated as an inventor (that is, based on ) rather than as an academic.  The main problem is that the current text of the article is highly promotional, essentially in the G11 territory, and ish. The only references cited are to the subject's own work, and there are / issues on top of that. The current text does not appear to be salvageable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:OR||WP:COI||WP:AUTO)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)