Deletion of The Acacia Strain

Comment: I disagree that the nomination was illegitimate.  The article has existed for over 10 months.  In all that time, no legitimate source has been added.  Articles may not stand around unsourced on Wikipedia forever.  Adding tags is helpful when new information is added that can likely be sourced, but this information was not new.   The only legitimate part of  (which I do not believe has the force of policy, as it does not match what , the actual policy, says) is #9.  #1 is untrue, #2 doesn't apply (this article is not a stub, has not recently been vandlized, etc.), #3 blatantly contradicts  and  (that is, no one ''has'' to choose to use tags rather than remove unverified information; had I removed the unverified info, nothing would have been left in the article), #9 I violated, and #10 doesn't apply (this is not a recently created article).  In any event, the AfD did what no one bothered to do for over a year--make this article follow the core  and  policies.  That means, in my opinion, that nominating for AfD was the correct approach.  As such I now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:DEL||WP:V||WP:BLP||WP:V||WP:BLP)

Comment: First, this nomination is illegitimate. If the previous people who worked on the article failed to add sources, that is a reason for others to expand and improve the article, and NOT a reason for deletion. The nominator also said "if none exists" (key word is IF) meaning that he/she didn't do good-faith research before nominating. These are all obvious violations of #1, 2, 3, 9, and 10 of , making this whole AfD useless except for the fact that now the rest of us know the article needs improvement. As for this band, they have an acceptable level of coverage at http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=THE|ACACIA|STRAIN&sql=11:dvfoxqraldae~T0 AllMusic, where the Charts & Awards tab notes their several placements on the charts, a fact that is easily verifiable at http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/the-acacia-strain/620189 Billboard. I also found a few other sources and added them to the article, plus a few edit and cleanup tags, which didn't take much more time than writing this vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)