Deletion of People wrongly convicted in the United States

Comment: but remove anyone who is still convicted.  It's not wrongful until a court agrees.  Do '''NOT''' remove people whose were "overturned on a technicality".  That will lead to endless arguing over what constitutes a "technicality", AND it's just as likely to exclude the "innocent" as the "guilty" (technicalities don't play favorites).  The law has declared these people not guilty; it's preposterous, and a violation of  for us to claim differently.  Even if "everyone knows he did it"; heck, even if he later admits he did it!  "Convicted" is a legal term, and it's silly to use anything but the legal definition in an article on this topic.  (I might suggest moving it to People wrongfully convicted in the United States, though, as "wrongful conviction" is the most commonly used term for this.)  Oh, and the bloody thing needs references and citations, of course.  As it stands, it fails / completely, but it's a clearly notable topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ATT||WP:V)

Comment: on the basis that I believe this is simply too broad a topic for a useful, concise list, and as such would almost violate the  provision regarding directories. I get the rationale behind it, and I don't have a POV issue. A better way to approach this would be to create articles strictly based upon the crime: ie. People wrongly convicted of murder in the United States; ... of treason; ...of armed robbery; etc etc. And even so, such lists will need to be monitored constantly otherwise people with agendas could add names to the list making this a  and libel nightmare. My first instinct is "don't go there" which is why I vote to delete, but if people want to have these lists, then let's at least make them more specific otherwise there could potentially be thousands of names listed here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BLP)