Deletion of Windblade

Comment: Probably the most interesting Transformers AfD I bothered looking at...  I didn't even know this was a Transformer since it wasn't in the title like most others, but clicking the link to see, I found it was a ''female'' transformer.  I haven't paid attention to Transformers for probably over 25 years now, but surely that's notable, I thought.  Sure enough, it does seem to be notable.  A simple Google search revealed a bunch of news back when the character was created covering both the creation, controversy, and praise for the concept.A https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2015/04/23/transformers-female-characters/26236633/ USA Today article, one Mary Sue article is already linked and then here is a https://www.themarysue.com/transformers-windblade-review/ review from them, there was a https://comicsalliance.com/transformers-windblade-comic-interview-idw-mairghread-scott-sarah-stone-female-women-creators/ Comics Alliance article/interview because of the creation, and there are at least 27 critics that have written about the comic (thanks, https://comicbookroundup.com/comic-books/reviews/idw-publishing/transformers-windblade Comic Book Roundup).  That's already two or more GNG sources equating to multiple, so I'm not going to look any further.  Notability is not in question.  The article should be ''improved'' not ''deleted''.   in the WP Notability test says that the sources only need to exist, not be present in the article.  Incorporating them will strengthen the article, but that can be done over time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)