Deletion of Manspreading

Comment: there are enough reliable sources. While the concept may not live into the next century (though who knows?), it's certainly not a mere ''internet'' trend.  Of course the article is a magnet for angry white man|angry white men — a few minutes ago, I removed a new and |pointy gallery, which has already been reinserted from another IP — but we have many articles of which that is true. Perhaps semiprotection should be considered. I don't understand why the last Delete voter above wants sources that address "mansplaining", but perhaps that was a mere typo or autocorrect error
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Lots of wp:Reliable sources, |Wikipedia is still not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: The topic passes: . For starters, see https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Manspreading%22&tbm=nws&gws_rd=ssl Google News search results
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)