Deletion of Simon Pulsifer

Comment: With all due reverence and awe at SimonP's superb work, there will always be an editor with highest edit count.  While the news articles do establish some notability, it is a borderline case so I say delete per .  Will the article be referenced in the future?  Best to limit the crossovers between editors and subjects as far as is possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:SELF)

Comment: He's made the foray out of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:SELF)

Comment: His relationship with wikipedia is irrelevant. All that is relevant is that he is a public figure due to press coverage and therefore merits an article. It is rather |POV to think that wikipedia should except itself from phenomena in the world. The fact is that wikipedia has now become established as a notable subject and will have to learn to cover itself as objectively as any other subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)