Deletion of Matthew Wilson (politician)

Comment: per . Definitely passes the notability criteria. The person is a well-known as a politician
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: have stubified and removed the copyright content. I reviewed this page and should have addressed the copyvio issue then (my bad). The article seems acceptable under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: but stubify.  He's notable per  as he has held a subnational/statewide position.  However, both citations are to the same source and much of the article contains unreferenced information, in contravention of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BLP)

Comment: as "members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature" are presumed notable under . The first source does not seem to mention the subject, and no secondary sources in the article confirm his electoral victory, but a quick search confirms that he won. The COI issue with the article needs to be addressed, as "the content he wanted included" is absolutely not acceptable under . Agree with {{u|StraussInTheHouse}} that stubifying is the right approach for now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NOTPROMO)