Deletion of Hindu Vidyapith

Comment: per , places of secondary education are generally kept, provided it's not made up and one reliable source shows it actually exists (which we seem to have consensus on). Nickaang is on point here, as internet coverage of sources that we would expect to see in the US for a high school is not necessarily as readily available in India, and deletion may contribute towards |systematic bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:BIAS)

Comment: We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet . Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on Indian schools because, unlike US schools for example, they don't dump everything on the Internet. Indeed, very few have much of an Internet presence at all. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this school cannot meet notability requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I would also like to reiterate that Nick has shown very credible evidence to suggest this meets . I think this AfD has a  chance considering OUTCOMES
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHS||WP:SNOW)

Comment: as per . Please, also search using the term "Chittaranjan Colony Hindu Vidyapith". I see many schools herehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_schools_in_India#West_Bengal without a single source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHS)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHS)