Deletion of Canadian Air Force Crash/Ejection History

Comment: WP:INDISCRIMINATE|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; this |directory of ejections is excellent work on the part of the author, but should be on a |private website, not Wikipedia, as it is a collection of |non-notable events; even with loss of life and loss of airframe, most likely did not lead to |significant changes in procedure or regulation. In addition, the article could easily be seen as a |memorial wall, which is |not what Wikipedia is for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:GNG||WP:AIRCRASH||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:NOT)

Comment: While the subject of this article does tread the trivia line very closely, the key issue for me is the lack of reliable references. I have removed two personal |self-published websites from the article which are clearly not acceptable references, but the use of http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/ is troublesome. This is clearly a one person, self-published "hobbiest" website. These sorts of sites have been debated before and found lacking as |reliable sources due to the lack of editorial oversight and independent fact-checking. So while whether this list fails  or  can be debated, it clearly fails  and  right now as it lacks acceptable references to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:RS||WP:TRIVIA||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:GNG||WP:N)