Deletion of Armenia–Chile relations

Comment: That argument is basically 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSUSEFUL)

Comment: notability established |the usual way.  I see no argument presented for why we need a much higher inclusion standard here than is the norm.  That the article can't be redirected to a single, other article shows pretty clearly why a merge is inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There is no assertion of this topic's notability in the context of history, only that it ''should be'' notable based on the title. The scant information found in this article can be merged to the two "Foreign relations of..." articles in the "See also" section to create more exhaustive and coherent articles there. The two "references" aren't even referenced in the text, and only point to very recent news articles when wikipedia is |not the news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)