Deletion of Journal of Bengali Studies

Comment: I was unable to find any evidence of multiple in-depth reliable sources. I was also unable to find any evidence of indexing in ''any'' indices. While we must be sensitive to possible systemic biases against journals outside the publishing mainstream, except for  an ISSN, there is just no secondary acknowledgement or coverage, period. It may be this is a case of  . Without such coverage, the journal fails notability per  and ournals. I could not find any appropriate merge targets, either, hence recommend deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:NJ)

Comment: per the policy and pillar of . Articles on scholarly journals should be presumed notable; we owe it to our readers to allow them to investigate the sources we are citing to document other WP articles. Even if there is little more the age and location of this particular journal, that is a start. Stubs do have value
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNOREALLRULES)

Comment: There is a serious case of  that needs to be taken into account with this article... the article was created by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)