Deletion of Comparison of web browser engines (typography support)

Comment: to the related articles. Tag the material as needing an update, as appropriate.  The CSS section should go to Comparison of browser engines (CSS support), the rest to Web typography#File formats. This is basically a 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK)

Comment: Meets  because there's significant coverage of browser support for typography features as a group or set (as seen on https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/11/web-open-font-format-backed-by-mozilla-type-foundries/ Ars Technica and https://www.cnet.com/news/typographic-pizzazz-coming-to-a-web-near-you/ CNET). The content of this page doesn't fit into any of the other "Comparison of browser engines" pages, because typography is distinct from HTML, CSS, and graphics. This article should immediately be moved to Comparison of browser engines (typography support) to match the naming convention of the other comparison pages, and also added to Template:Browser engines. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: if you want these types of comparisons deleted, nominate everything in :Category:Browser engine comparisons. (Yes, I'm blatantly invoking  here, because this is ridiculous.) This page should be renamed to drop the "web" part, given the rest of that category
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)