Deletion of Algebraic Geometry (journal)

Comment: From everything I can find, this seems like a legitimate publication, but perhaps |too new to really merit an article. Typically, I would suggest redirecting to the publisher and carrying over the AMS and Zentralblatt citations to provide sources for basic facts. In this case, however, Foundation Compositio Mathematica redirects to the article on their primary publication, ''Compositio Mathematica.'' My current feeling is that Foundation Compositio Mathematica should be an actual article that summarizes https://compositio.nl/#foundation the activities of the foundation, and both ''Compositio Mathematica'' and ''Algebraic Geometry (journal)|Algebraic Geometry'' should be sections of that article. To me, this seems to strike the right balance between |preserving uncontroversial content about legitimate mathematics publishing (thereby being useful to the mathematical community) and giving undue weight to efforts that have just recently gotten going
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: to European_Mathematical_Society#Publications, where it is mentioned. This is a reputable journal put out by a reputable organization and publisher that unfortunately doesn't meet our threshold for notability. But basic facts are verifiable in independent RS such as the math catalogs above. Hence, per  it is reasonable explore alternatives to deletion per . The journal is owned/edited by Foundation Compositio Mathematica and published/printed by European_Mathematical_Society. I agree with
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)