Deletion of Celibacy syndrome

Comment: to Demographics of Japan and '''Redirect''' (apparently they are worried in Japan about population demographics and want youngsters making more babies, even if unmarried). I suspect the editors advocating a speedy keep haven't read the sources, which amount to the press labeling Japanese "surveys" as a "syndrome".  (Globalization, please.)  One survey shows that Japanese college females are engaging in less sex (which would fit in the sexual abstinence article if this trend extended beyond Japan), and another survey shows that the Japanese unmarried are dating less, and then one article goes on to talk about a sex therapist.  Neither of these surveys rise to the level of anything amounting to an article labeled "celibacy syndrome" just because that's what the Japanese press is calling it.  It is typical for the press to sensationalize survey findings (and misreport them, which is why we have ); one of the press accounts cited above is entitled "waning coed promiscuity",http://www.japantoday.com/smartphone/view/kuchikomi/sex-counselor-seeks-explanations-for-waning-co-ed-promiscuity and I recommend a read of the http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/10/22/japans-hottest-new-sex-trend-is-not-having-sex/ ''Time'' article listed above for an example of the level of discussion relative to whether we can get an article out of this.  We have guidelines about how to name and formulate articles and topics, and we don't have to follow the translation of an unscientific usage of a neologism from one country.  Our general notability guidelines (GNG) do not tell us how to name an article, or where the content must be placed, and there isn't sufficient content here (even if expanded to the sources) to warrant more than a mention of a Japanese trend or cultural issue in the sexual abstinence article, or dating articles if found to be a more global trend, or the Demographics of Japan article if these "surveys" are found to have any credibility in more scholarly Japanese sources.   Press accounts of surveys relevant to one country do not a syndrome make
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: The sources are describing something which meets , but since those sources are not reliable to give information on medical issues, this article as a medical topic should be deleted. The content may belong elsewhere or this could be written to clarify that this "syndrome" is a non-medical media concept, until such time as reliable sources say otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Although the article is mediocre at best, to claim it isn't notable is incorrect, and to claim the sources in the article are unreliable is utterly bizarre. This smashes GNG to pieces, based on http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/young-people-japan-stopped-having-sex, http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/515323/20131021/japan-celibacy-syndrome-sex-relation-survey.htm, http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/10/22/japans-hottest-new-sex-trend-is-not-having-sex/, http://www.japantoday.com/smartphone/view/kuchikomi/sex-counselor-seeks-explanations-for-waning-co-ed-promiscuity, http://theweek.com/article/index/251438/what-america-could-learn-from-japans-sex-deficit, etc. Now, if you wanted to argue that the term hasn't had much sustained usage, then you probably could, but there is a catastrophic lack of  here; so much so that it appears that the nominator has failed 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: there is not a single reliable medical source given. Please read . Newspapers do not get to ''invent'' syndrome and we should definitely not promote them if they try to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)