Deletion of Scattershot (book)

Comment: Meets the |notability criteria for books, and even Wikipedia: Notability, with multiple non-trivial articles in unrelated sources, namely ''Vail Daily'', and ''Talk of the Nation'' http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94282263. ''Publisher's Weekly'', and ''Lansing State Journal'' have shorter articles that may not be sufficient in themselves (though help), but the earlier two are enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: and '''salt'''. It fails the |notability criteria for books and there are persistent edit reversions from what Special:Contributions/Once on a vending machine|rather resembles a |single-purpose account that wants the article to be phrased in a very particular way and seems to have tried to take ownership of the content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:SPA)

Comment: The review in Publishers Weekly alone is enough to satisfy notability even before other factors are taken into account. Is that |SNOW I see on my shoulder, or danduff ... OK, it's dandruff, but still
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: In addition to the sources listed in the article and by GRuban I found these |reliable sources which taken together easily allow the book to pass the multiple non-trivial articles requirement in .  Specific statements in the article should be corrected through regular editing, that should have nothing to do with deletion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BK)