Deletion of Odette Krempin (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per Bridger, and based on my understanding of German (in any event, I've asked some with high-level German translation capability to opine here as well, as they will be best able to judge; if their view conflicts w/mine, I am open to changing my vote).  See some more gnewshits http://news.google.com/news/search?oe=UTF-8&um=1&q=Odette+Krempins&sa=N&tab=pn&um=1&cf=all here and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Odette+Krempins&cf=all here.  As far as the comments above regarding the use of non-English sources, the relevant core content policy is , which states in pertinent part: "English-language sources are preferable to sources in other languages so that readers can easily verify the content of the article. However, sources in other languages are acceptable where an English equivalent is not available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NONENG)

Comment: per  - 18 months since last Afd is more than enough time for sources to be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Wow, things have certainly moved on since I originally requested page protection (against the addition of unreferenced allegations of fraud). On the  issue, I agree with what seems to be the emerging consensus - that this being the English language Wikipedia does not mean it can only include subjects that are referenced in English (at least, that's how I understand it, that the issue is not what language someone has been noted in, but whether they are notable in the world in general - it seems like cultural arrogance to insist that people are only worthy of note if they've been written about in English). And so the existence of references in German only (given that they are of high quality) is not a good reason to delete. On notability, I'm not sure, but is "honorary consul of the Democratic Republic of the Congo in Frankfurt am Main" not sufficient? Anyway, after reading what everyone else has said, my feeling on the deletion issue is to veer on the side of "keep", but wait a bit longer and see if anything else emerges
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NONENG)