Deletion of Rodryg Dunin (3rd Nomination)

Comment: Absolutely nothing has changed since the last AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodryg Dunin 2) except for improvements - much of the OR is gone. But the subject is clearly notable having an entry in the Polski słownik biograficzny - the Polish equivalent of the Dictionary of National Biography. It has 25,000 entries because its scope is all notable people in Polish history and is a highly regarded text - to suggest our inclusion standards are higher is absurd. The dictionary is a perfectly acceptable source as |non-English sources are acceptable and widely used in the English Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a global project - there are Polish editors who can review this source. One has indeed provided a rough translation on the talkpage. If this translation is not enough, another can be sought. We are going to create a huge anglo-US bias if we start rejecting foreign sources so casually
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:RSUE)

Comment: per ). Then I suggest discussing whether nominator's behavior - trying to damage encyclopedic content - has been disruptive and pointless enough - to warrant a block. As far as I see it, this AfD is bad faith disruption
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:SPEEDY)