Deletion of Spider Solitaire (Windows)

Comment: I can understand the reasons to keep on FreeCell (a form of solitare that was popularized on Windows) and the other Solitare (the bouncy-card animation its claim to fame), but there is '''nothing''' here to suggest that the shipped Spider Solitare in Windows is notable on its own, and the arguments applied before do not apply.  90% of this article fails #GAMEGUIDE, and what's left is not enough for any reasonable article. I am not aware of any appropriate merge target for this, but there may be one, and if such exists, merge + redirect makes sense. But right now, deletion makes the most sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The guideline pages say there are occasional exceptions, as does .  Just common sense.  Hundreds of millions of people have this on their computer, unknown millions have tried it, and nothing gained by deleting the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Nothing GAMEGUIDEish about this article can't be solved through regular editing (i.e., deleting the offending text to pare down the article), and as such  expects that before deletion is considered.  Even so, as a Windows component, the article can clearly be merged into Windows 98 if the RSes are deemed insufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Notable per : the article is referenced to multiple RS covering the subject. Also it is simply insane that a piece of software included by default in the most popular operating system can be deemed "unnotable" per our house rules. Here we're in safe  territory, but I wonder if whoever does these nominations asks her/himself what benefit such a deletion would give the readers. If our rules make things worse for the encyclopedia and its usefulness, it is time to |ignore them (and then fix them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:IAR)

Comment: nbsp; As far as wp:notability, this topic is beyond famous, and yes, we can present page stats to explain what some of us consider routinely obvious to editors who may be neither PC users nor game players, that this topic satisfies WP:N as "worthy of notice" before we even start to look at specific guidelines such as WP:GNG.&nbsp; Of course, WP:V remains a core content policy, and this article has problems in this regard, but the problems with WP:V in this article do not rise to the level of eletion policy.&nbsp; Although AfD is not clean-up, I added a few tags which should alert readers to problems in this article, and hopefully will lead to a better-sourced article.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)