Deletion of Chuck Oberlie

Comment: The usual standard that an elected official must pass to meet the notability standards of Wikipedia is  with common outcomes described at . For local mayors, reaching notability usually means receiving national or international press coverage for their service as mayor. The reason for this is that most elected officials remain |low profile individuals through and after their terms of office. This means that there is presumption of privacy and there is a community expectation that authors should "focus on high-quality secondary sources" when dealing with relatively-unknown individuals See " In this case, there does not appear to be any sources that suggests that the subject received coverage "beyond the scope of what would ordinarily be expected for their role" 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:LPI||WP:NPF||WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: First note, "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability", according to . The subject clearly does not receive significant coverage; evidence to this is in the poorly-referenced article and an easy-to-do  search which garners little else. I would elaborate further but Bearcat has hit the nail right on the head several times already above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BEFORE)