Deletion of Sego (diet drink)

Comment: These |self-published sources do not meet wikipedia's guidelines for |reliable sources.  "well known" is |subjective and doesn't have as much to do with notability, at least for Wikipedia, as you might think.  It seems paradoxical but a subject that is hardly known at all can and has often met Wikipedia notability guidelines more easily than something that is widely known.  It all comes down to if/how it is being covered in |reliable sources.  You are going to have to come up with something more persuasive that "I like it and other people do too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:RS||WP:IKNOWIT||WP:RS)

Comment: I have demonstrated that the product was notable by showing how it lives on after its actual demise. Articles for sale on Amazon and Ebay are not self-published sources nor are they subjective. No one has said that the links were a reliable source, I merely introduced the links to emphasise that it is a still recognised product and is worthy of an article. I have never made the argument "I like it and other people do too" and I do not have to come up with anything more persuasive - This is a forum where users have their say and an Administrator decides on the strength of argument. So kindly desist in trying to negate peoples opinion by quoting irrelevant  policy. Please move on and let this Afd run its course
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)