Deletion of The Saudi Arabia of

Comment: Regarding this article, I hated it, but then again, I think it's unimaginative writing when a journalist calls something "The Saudi Arabia of ____".  With well in mind, I have to say that a well-sourced article is ''exactly'' what we want to see in Wikipedia, whether we like the subject or not.  I can't, at least not with a straight face, call this original research or original synthesis.  Every one of the entries is sourced, and checking each entry confirms that journalists describe a place with the lion's share of some resource as a "Saudi Arabia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)