Deletion of Faggot (slang)

Comment: An article that is well written – well sourced – properly in-line cited – informative - Has been the subject of numerous Google Scholar|Scholarly works, as noted here http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Faggot%22+-+homosexual&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search and been around for almost 5 years is now being considered for |AFD. Have I missed something
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: not every article about a word fails . Consider, for example, the featured article Thou.  only says that articles must be more than a mere dictionary definition, it never says that articles about words are forbidden. If this article said "'''Faggot''' is a derogatory slang word for a gay man" and ''nothing else'', it would fail  and have to be either transwikied or deleted. But it says a great deal more than that and so is an encyclopedia article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:DICDEF||WP:DICDEF)

Comment: nom's comment to first commenter leads me to believe this is a y nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)