Deletion of Alternative natural history

Comment: as |original research. The concept does not seem discussed anywhere reputable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as |OR unless sources can be produced that show where the information came from
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  and/or eologism. A search in Google Scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22alternative+natural+history%22&hl=en&lr= shows that this term isn't really used in the meaning relevant to this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: It's essentially a copy-paste of the other article in question (Speculative biology) and nothing more than a blurb of .  No reason to keep, compelling or otherwise. —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as |Original Research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)