Deletion of NewTV

Comment: Article seems to show significant notability, and has some credible sourcing. Article certainly needs some cleanup, but should be tagged, not deleted. I'd also question the nominators comments about . The user has not claimed COI, (apart from a username block), so we shouldn't infer in a conversation, and even if it was a COI account that made the page, it isn't a deletion policy. Articles created by COI members are '''strongly discouraged''', but not against WP ToS. In these cases, if the member has a COI, he really should declare it, but it has gone through AfC, which is how we should send all COI cases. The Boston Globe articles should really be enough for GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)