Deletion of Nicholas Nip

Comment: The nominator is misinterpreting , which is meant for low-profile individuals caught up in a single news story. It does not apply to the career of a chess master, however brief it is. |Notability is not temporary, and becoming the youngest ever US chess master is a notable achievement which was covered at the time in reliable sources like http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/crosswords/chess/16chess.html?mcubz=1 The New York Times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: 1E does apply. It was a child who was in the spotlight for breaking a record and does not appear to have played since. We have no reason to believe he sought the spotlight (independently from his parents, coach, or whoever else) and thus -- again, as a child -- should be considered a low-profile individual. There's the record, but a big part of what's notable about it ''is'' the controversy. That raises  issues, since it's not just one event, but it was a ''controversial'' event. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)