Deletion of Factual dispute

Comment: Another example of a novel article that represents |original research by editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: basically what I see here is a tautological statement (as pointed out by aeropagitica) and then it veers off into a catch-all, apparently trying to explain different kinds of factual disputes and why some cannot be solved.  The first sentence is a dicdef and the rest is an essay of sorts. No |verification from |reliable sources.  It looks to me like an original research essay... I'm willing to reconsider though if someone advances a good argument why this article should stay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)