Deletion of George W. Bush substance abuse controversy

Comment: Notable controversy about a prominent public figure. Allegations of drug use should be sourced and limited to reliable sources, yes, but deletion of the article would be taking  too far
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: There's no question about it, the subject is notable and reliable sources are available. Any unreferenced allegation should be remove per  but this is far from an attack page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: especially since the nom has went and created POV fork Barack Obama substance abuse controversy (no doubt to make a |POINT
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Per  and , poorly self-published sources () speculating about George W. Bush's potential drug use would be akin to creating an article called Barack Obama substance abuse controversy and populating the article with quotes from Larry Sinclair.  As the original nominator, I am leaning merge or keep now (more keep since there is a lot of information here already
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:GRAPEVINE||WP:SPS)

Comment: The burden of proof rests with those wishing to add new material.  The material of this artcile could easily be summarised and mereged with the parent article.  Furthermore this article being about a living persons runs the rist of not having a NPOV and is contrary to this Wiki principle: "Remove any contentious material about living persons that is unsourced; that is a conjectural interpretation of a source" ()  Besides which biographies of living people should use reliable third party information and not delve into speculation. ()  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:GRAPEVINE||WP:WELLKNOWN)