Deletion of List of traps in the Saw film series (3rd nomination)

Comment: it's not "original research" to summarize a part of a film. And there is no policy against "trivia." And  never had consensus to be added to policy anyway. There are plenty of film reviews regarding the ''Saw'' series and I'm sure many of the reviews mention the traps. This article adds to Wikipedia's coverage of the ''Saw'' series, and it can be improved through normal editing. It's not a hopeless case. There was no consensus to delete in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (2nd nomination)|second AFD. I'm certainly interested in what Stifle meant in the second AFD when he said "Per the general weight of comments" since nine people who said delete used the word "cruft" (as in, "I don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: This fails #PLOT excessively. The traps are a prominent part of the series, but the plot sections in the main articles should be enough to cover the important details. The rest is just unnecessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:INDISCRIMINATE|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  Also seems to be full of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as it fail . The films are good films. They are popular films, but this article is appalling fancruft and must go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: as an enormous violation of .  Plot detail is acceptable to ''complement'' the topic as conveyed by secondary sources, '''''not''''' the other way around.  There is far more plot detail than any informative real-world context from secondary sources.  None of the sources that do exist really exercise significant coverage about ''traps throughout the film series''; is there a reason to break out each individual film article when it comes to covering the traps from each film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: per #PLOT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)