Deletion of Sheila Elizabeth Whitton

Comment: per . The nomination starts with "Unfortunately, as she seems to have been a fascinating woman..." I agree, and I think we should bend our interpretation of the rules in favor of keeping articles on fascinating women (and people in general, but women are often under-reported in history) who are well-documented enough for us to be well-assured that the accounts are likely to be accurate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  due to lack of secondary source coverage. Primary source interviews do not count for notability and while the WRENS in general were notable, Whitton herself is not individually notable enough for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)