Deletion of Shooting of Jiansheng Chen

Comment: per , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per . No lasting notability. If this has impact on something else, then that's where it should be described. The other keep arguments seem to center on this being "widely reported", but that only fails . It may be used as source material, but that's not sufficient for a stand-alone article. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as per nomination and , not enough information to have it's own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I could find several mentions of the death in international media, but the lack of more than a passing mention just doesn't seem to meet . It doesn't help that the article itself fails to specify any reasons for notability (such as any controversy that may have been caused by the cause of death
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: as per .  I was troubled by the fact that sources on the page are local (Note that WaPo is a regional paper) and the NBC stories are on NBC Asian.   The anglophone Asian press, however, has picked this story up and run with it as though it is a race crime, although coverage I looked at does not support this.  However, The AP now has this: "Security guard charged with murder in Chesapeake shooting", picked up by a local paper http://www.martinsvillebulletin.com/news/security-guard-charged-with-murder-in-chesapeake-shooting/article_9015bb1b-a6a0-5b1f-a712-c64c8d8ff844.html Trial will bring out issues such as was the guard or the company that hired him negligent, and whether they is anything to the support the idea that victim was targeted because he was Asian.  Suggest that we close as ''''No consensus'''  for now and revisit in 6 months.  Trial may also clarify whether there is an appropriate merge target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: The amount of coverage alone is not enough to justify keeping the article. To justify keeping an article on an event, we need to establish some significance and impact.  states "While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, ''most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion.''"emphasis added What we have here is a typical crime news event which is used to fill air time and print copy because it is "odd" (to quote SlowSuperMom) but which is forgotten a week later because it has no real impact on anyone not directly involved, and because every week someone is shot in their bathtub or run over by drunken joyriders or permanently scarred by falling face first on a box of thumb tacks. Unusual deaths just aren't that unusual, and they certainly aren't notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP: NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per . Sad event but no lasting notability or significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: far from being "largely of local interest" this has been reported worldwide.  doesn't apply to events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)