Deletion of 14th Feb - The Deadline (2nd nomination)

Comment: newly released short film that requires more commentary (analysis, reviews, etc.) in reliable sources in order to meet . Its existence is not in doubt. Allow undeletion or recreation only ir or when more independent sources come forward
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: I cannot find anything to show that this short film passes notability guidelines. Sources may exist in another language, but I doubt that there would be enough for the film to pass notability guidelines. I can find things that show that the short exists, but |existing is not notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: there is no significant coverage in independent |'''reliable sources''' with an emphasis on reliable sources.  Simply point to a bunch of Google search results nad claiming they represent multiple references is insufficient.  Specific coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject need to be shown.  I do not see that in the artiole, nor am I able to find any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Still fails . References are IMDB (does not by itself confer notability per NFILM), two refs are from the production house founded by the director, final is essentially a list of photo galleries for local events saying nothing except that the film was screened
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)