Deletion of Irish head of state from 1936 to 1949

Comment: Deletion is over the top. Why not just ? Possibly the title itself is a problem. The article really is on the unresolved issues between the External Relations Act and the Republic of Ireland Act. Was Ireland a republic? Who was the head of state? It was an issue at the time (cf. De Valera's "dictionary republic"). It's a valid topic for an encyclopaedia and there are plenty of sources around it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:FIXIT)

Comment: none of the "keeps" so far has addressed the essential question of inherent notability per : "If a topic has received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list...''"Significant coverage"'' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so Wikipedia:No original research|no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." The single ref that has now been added is not to a source that addresses the subject directly in detail
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)