Deletion of Tiger Woods (dog)

Comment: There is ample coverage in |reliable sources about the subject of this article, a Scottish deerhound.See http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090210/LIFE18/90210030 this article from the ''Times Herald-Record''. This article presents information about the deerhound's breed, age, and accomplishments. Although the dog's name may have garnered it coverage in the ''Times Herald-Record'', the article is primarily about the deerhound's dog show accomplishments, not its name. I consider it |original research to classify this article as being a "puff piece" when there is no evidence of it being so. The article discusses how the dog was the "winner of the Hound group and Best in Show competitor at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show" and how it would compete "against six other dogs for the title of Best in Show". The depth of coverage in this article is enough for this source to qualify as the "significant coverage" required by Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline.Additionally, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2009/02/scottish-deerho.html this blog from the ''Los Angeles Times'' provides decent coverage about this deerhound. This article |verifies that the dog's owner is Gayle Bontecou and its handler is Clifford W. Steele. How does this article establish that Tiger Woods (dog) is notable? It states that "a Scottish deerhound has never won best in show at Westminster." Because the ''Los Angeles Times'' found it worthy to make this dog the subject of one of its publications, Tiger Woods (dog) is clearly notable.http://www.dogchannel.com/dog-news/2009/02/11/records-set-and-history-made-at-westminster.aspx This article from ''Dog Channel'' provides a paragraph of coverage about this deerhound. The article states "Tiger has accumulated an impressive show record, but taking the Group at the Garden is without a doubt his most illustrious win yet … quite a feat for a 7-year-old dog of a giant breed." Phrases such as "impressive show record" and "quite a feat" establish that this deerhound has notable achievements.Winning "Best in Show" at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, a prestigious contest, is already a good indicator that Tiger Woods (dog) is notable. Receiving media coverage because of these accomplishments cements this notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: I see numerous |reliable sources demonstrating the dog's notability, including the major U.S. sources ESPN and USA Today. You removed a lot of prose text and changed it into a list. This is an encyclopedia designed to be prose not lists - so you did the opposite of what you're ideally supposed to do. I saw little fluff material in the article before your removal. Earlier this year, I reviewed this article while it was waiting in the queues for |Did You Know and editing out some fluff
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:DYK)