Deletion of Seth Sabal

Comment: Well, the article has been busted back to a stub that at least is |verifiable which is a good thing.  I don't have an opinion yet, but for those trying to get this article kept, please read .  Right now there is a contention that his work has appeared in several magazines, which would meet  criteria.  What is missing though is |reliable sources indicating this.  All sources and external links in the article are from Mr. Sabal's website which, for the perpose of determining , can't exactly be viewed as a neutral and reliable source.  Can someone produce external links or evidence of his work being published that is reported by a source other than his own website
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: You say that ''there is a contention that his work has appeared in several magazines, which would meet  criteria.'' I'm puzzled by this. I can't see anything to support this in  (though I must admit that I haven't yet drunk my first coffee of the day and thus may have missed something), whereas when I look within that page for "photographer" I read of''Published ... photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work''; and I don't think that any of the various usernames who have defended this "artical", as they call it, have claimed multiple independent reviews of or awards for Sabal's work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Apparent |advertisement for at best pre-notable subject.  Possible |autobiography and/or |sockpuppetry issues as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ADS||WP:AUTO||WP:SOCK)