Deletion of Neon Genesis Evangelion glossary

Comment: while there are some cites... none of it seems to be to ''independent'' reliable sources. Nothing here to . And what little can be verified (which is right now not much) does not justify an entire glossary of every fictional entity in the series
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:verify notability)

Comment: all in-universe, full of original research, not a single independant secondary source thus non-notable. Wikipedia articles are not made for a specific minority of fans, but for everyone, and notability is not defined according to the "intended audience", but by a set of criteria, established by the community, and which were precisely made to garantee that no article will be written exclusively for fans (hence the mandatory ''independant secondary'' sources). RobertMfromLI, if you want to write articles geared toward NGE/Anime/SF fans, I'm sure you'll find tons of fanwikis out there, but keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a #FANSITE|fansite. And please, try to avoid misplaced comparisons between fictional technology and real world science
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: excessive |plot summary and |fan trivia. What little of this article is actually sourced to anything is sourced entirely to |the works themselves and the rest is |fan interpretation. The fact that a series is popular does not mean that a huge proliferation of |crufty articles is OK, nor does it turn enthusiastic fan chatter into an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:TRIVIA||WP:PSTS||WP:SYNTH||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: A clear example of excessive detail that would only be interested by a very small group of dedicated fans. Reading though some of the "entries" I've noticed a large amount of |original research and original synthesis and I strongly suspect that a lot of the content is simply made up by fans as well. Defining these "terms" does not actually help readers understand the contents of the main article or the plot summaries. This is the type of thing that typically belongs on a fansite, but |not in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:IINFO)