Deletion of Margaret Stock

Comment: Ping|Johnpacklambert}} You must be kidding. A MacArthur Fellowship is not an academic award, since it has been awarded to people like blacksmiths and social justice advocates as well as academics and authors and artists, but it certainly meets the  standard as a "well-known and significant award or honor". Are you arguing otherwise? The awards itself and the recipients receive massive coverage in reliable sources every single year. Look it up
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: The person is notable as a recipient of MacArthur Fellows Program|MacArthur Fellowship, and hence meets : "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: MacArthur makes her meet . Improvements to the article have been made. No reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: She is indeed notable as a recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship, a major award.she meets  and WP:GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: The timing of this article's creation was indeed quite suspicious, but campaign advertising for topics lacking enduring notability has been an unfortunate way of life on Wikipedia for years.  That won't change until people get their heads screwed on straight about what's notable versus what's today's or yesterday's trending topics and quit relying on corporate media to dictate to them what to write about on here.  Going back to United States Senate election in Alaska, 2010|the last election for this same U.S. Senate seat, Scott McAdams had some pretty blatant COI issues.  Moreover, I've seen evidence of the belief that McAdams was highly notable six years ago but is non-notable today.  I don't believe whatsoever that this is the way Wikipedia is supposed to work.  The reason I say "neutral" boils down to https://www.adn.com/politics/2016/10/22/alaska-democrats-face-internal-strife-over-u-s-senate-candidate this story.  To summarize, much of the Alaska Democratic Party establishment is supporting Stock over their own nominee, Ray Metcalfe.  Evidence of that was abundant during the recently-concluded Alaska Federation of Natives convention.  Perhaps this is the opposite of , namely that this AFD is coming along too soon.  Given that the election is two weeks away, if Stock's money and party support results in a respectable showing at the polls, it could be necessary to revisit a deleted article.  Since the article has been around this long, there is no real harm in waiting until after the election
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)