Deletion of James Potter (series)

Comment: spaces|2}}¶{{spaces|2}}I assume the argument for deletion is a failing of Wikipedia:Notability; if I'm incorrect, please let me know.  The five sources are: a press release at Cision, news.com.au, ''Publishers Weekly'', HPANA, and ''The Scotsman''; three of those are optimal.  Unless the article can meet the |Heymann Standard, it should be merged to either Harry Potter fandom#Fan fiction or legal disputes over the Harry Potter series#G. Norman Lippert, both of which discuss the series (the latter of which is the target of ''James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)