Deletion of The Libel Tourist

Comment: Thanks to all for your input so far. If the issue is finding reviews, then perhaps the "critical reception" section could be tagged for expansion to get some more 3rd party reviews found and added by other editors.  I, too, will continue to expand it as I find more info.  If the issue is notability of the filmmakers involved, I know that the writer/director directed (to my knowledge) at least one other Wikipedia:Notability (films)|notable film, ''Over da Rainbow'', credited there as "Jay Lap"; i.e., he is probably notable enough to have his own page (and I may work on that in the future) - and I believe that this film would constitute a significant work of his as per .  But perhaps most importantly, I believe there's a lot more to be said about this film, and I think it may get expanded as users read it and feel Wikipedia:Be bold|the urge to contribute (Article's OP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: mdash; This is a very tough call. To start with, I'm not so sure this fails . There is at least one review of the short documentary, http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23545 although the author of that article does not appear to be particularly notable. Then you have http://cmcevoy.public.dev.nationalreview.com/corner/152482/libel-tourist/stanley-kurtz this, which I'm not sure is an actual article or a personal blog; either way, this commentator actually Stanley Kurtz|is notable. Otherwise, I'm just not sure. A part of me is inclined to support keeping the article as a borderline case despite arguably not fully meeting Wikipedia's |film notability guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTFILM||WP:NOTFILM)