Deletion of Paul Pelosi

Comment: as a pass of . It's impossible to talk about him without mentioning his spouse, for obvious reasons, and of course articles that only mention him in passing as a spouse should not count toward notability. But among other things he's actually notorious for losing millions in American football leagues that aren't named "NFL". I just added the Washington Post profile http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/16/AR2009101603542.html?noredirect=on on the occasion of his first investment in the UFL. He passes  on his own, and there's plenty of material on him to expand the article, should someone wish to build up rather than tear down
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: per SportingFlyer's arguments. The articles about his investments in minor league American football teams is totally separate from his wife's political activities, and is likely enough for him to pass  on his own
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: seems to pass  to me, and doesn't seem to violate any policy that I can detect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily passes  as showed by the sources listed in the comments above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: notability is not inherited. The difficulty here is she is more notable than he is and eclipses him. He's also fairly private. Still, the SF Gate article counts, and Mr. Pelosi's minor league football ownership attracted some attention as well, such as but not including to here https://www.sfgate.com/politics/joegarofoli/article/Employees-of-UFL-Sacramento-team-sue-Paul-Pelosi-4667148.php. It's enough to get him over the  line, and most importantly I think he'd be similarly borderline notable if he were married to someone else
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)