Deletion of Howard Griffiths (scientist)

Comment: per  because the subject is the chair and a fellow at an Oxbridge college.  While not a "named" chair, that's fairly prestigious.  He also has http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Howard+Griffiths%22+%2B+cambridge&as_sdt=0%2C33&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 over 100 Ghits on Google scholar and has published in many major scholarly journals. He is also the author of at least one http://books.google.com/books?id=nUXvoqD5irsC&pg=PP20&dq=%22Howard+Griffiths%22+%2B+cambridge&hl=en&ei=bxGSTZamB4Wutwf9-IVb&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Howard%20Griffiths%22%20%2B%20cambridge&f=false major text. I think that's |enough for inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BARE)

Comment: Adding to Xxan's findings, this subject has a WoS h-index of 28 (query = "Author=(Griffiths H*) Refined by: Subject Areas=(PLANT SCIENCES) Timespan=All Years. Databases=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI") &ndash; a ''conclusive'' pass of  #1. I should think this would have been obvious to the nom (who tried PROD previously) had s/he simply bothered to check. No need to claim a pass because of his position as a chair. This is a clear policy-based "keep". Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Departmental chair does not give notability according to rof but an h index of 24 on Google Scholar does. Will the nominator please explain why he ignored this information
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)