Deletion of Alain Haché

Comment: He passes #C1 because of the high impact of his publications (five papers with over 100 cites each) and #C5 because of the Canada Research Chair
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: According to  ''if an academic/professor meets any '''one''' of the following conditions'', then the professor is notable.  Alain Haché arguably meets #C1 (publications cited by others, see Google search above), #C5 (national chair), and #C7 (physics of hockey).  As others have noted above, one or more of these achievements may be borderline, but collectively they establish beyond any doubt that Alain Haché is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes , and if that wasn't enough, he's been repeatedly cited in third-party sources as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: He holds a "Tier 2" national chair, which is defined http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/program-programme/index-eng.aspx here as being for "''exceptional emerging researchers, acknowledged by their peers as having the potential to lead in their field''." To me that says, "you have the potential to be notable, so we'll invest in you." This makes meeting #C5 questionable and not definitive. Also, I don't read #C1 to mean that if your research is cited enough times, you are determined to have made "significant impact in your scholarly discipline." So it is not definitive that Hache meets that criteria either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)