Deletion of Croatia–Iceland relations

Comment: Your suggestion amounts to an automatic "Keep" for any series of stubs, no matter how utterly unencyclopedic, just because a very few people are attempting to create a notability guideline. Most such efforts drag on with endless disputation before they are abandoned as failed efforts. The guideline should, rather be , where a few words could be added to reflect the fact of what the outcomes of these AFDs show to be the consensus of the community. Guidelines reflect practice, not what a few fans of something or opponents of it want the rules to be. See past efforts to create guidelines for schools, religious congregations, shopping malls, persons of nobility and news stories, among many others
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'm really just going by  in most of these cases, and in this case, there seems to be no coverage. Enumerations of how many articles we ''might'' have or discussons of whether an embassy or a consulate is enough for automatic notability for me just muddy the waters
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails |notability and OT|not a directory or random collection of information. Better to have 200 sections or articles on "Foreign relations of ..." for each sovereign nation than about 20,000 random pairings which merely regurgitate information from the websites of the foreign ministries, and which will quickly become stale and outdated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT)