Deletion of Bank of Ideas

Comment: Though the article needs work I'm seeing sufficient sources specifically about the Bank of Ideas (rather than a mention in a larger piece about Occupy) to satisfy . Some of those (and some which talk about this substantially in connection to Occupy) see http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/occupy-bank-of-ideas-first-weekend Vice, http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jan/27/occupy-london-disused-former-bank Guardian, http://now-here-this.timeout.com/2011/11/21/occupy-london-inside-the-bank-of-ideas/ Timeout, https://www.adbusters.org/abtv/occupy-london%E2%80%99s-bank-ideas.html Adbusters, http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/12192/1/occupy-london-bank-of-ideas Dazed, http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/laurie-penny/2012/01/occupy-movement-london New Statesman, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/protesters-open-bank-of-ideas-6264750.html Independent, http://londonist.com/2012/01/occupy-evicted-from-bank-of-ideas.php Londonist... These were on the first couple pages of ghits. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Upon a source review, passes , thus qualifying for an article. Also, |notability is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)