Deletion of International Council of 13 Indigenous Grandmothers

Comment: no significant coverage found in multiple reliable sources of the organization, therefore subject appears to fail notability as defined by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are sufficient reliable sources to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: all the daughter articles (pun intended) into the main article.  I've been here long enough to see this is exactly the sort of list-type article that |is usually kept for cost/benefit reasons.  As some facts may not be individually key or important in a legal case, but key as a group of facts, so lists of this type keep everything together in one place for convenience and context.  I'm not a fan of "new-Age-ism" (pun also intended), but it's what our readers want and |has been past consensus to keep. It would be much worse to have a bunch of little articles but not one main article, or other other hand, nothing here when people are looking for it. We have rules for |fringe topics, and I think this abides. Slap me with a trout if I'm being unreasonable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CCC||WP:FRINGE)