Deletion of ISO 259-3

Comment: to Uzzi Ornan. Actually, whether the standard has been published or not doesn't necessarily affect its notability. If it has received significant coverage in independent reliable sources per  then we could have an article on it, even if it wasn't published. (We should of course note in the article that it was not an accepted ISO standard if this were the case.) Uzzi Ornan is the originator of the proposed standard, so the paper by him that you mention can't be used to prove notability, as it is not an independent source. This leaves us with sources that are not cited in the article. I had a look online and found http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gSbgKxtB1HoC&pg=PA274#v=onepage&q&f=false this source which has a good description of the proposed standard and which seems able to count toward notability. There were also a few mentions of Ornan's paper, and a couple of transcriptions that used the standard, but nothing else that discussed the standard itself. This doesn't quite seem like enough to satisfy the "significant coverage" clause of , but it is enough that we could mention the proposed standard in another article. Ornan's article seems like the best fit, so I recommend merging any verifiable material there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)