Deletion of Kevin D. Skelton

Comment: Firstly, being an orphan and possible autobiography and not having been worked on recently have no relevance to a deletion discussion. Including those in the nomination can only serve to distract from the real issues of notability and sources. There seem to be two claims of possible notability in the article. First that the subject has "had great success internationally in numerous festivals and competitions". For that to hold water we need to know which festivals and competitions - even http://www.kevinskelton.com/ his own web site doesn't list them, and I can find no reports of any such success from Google News archive searches for "Kevin D. Skelton"http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Kevin+D.+Skelton%22+&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&scoring=a or "Kevin Skelton".http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Kevin+Skelton%22+-omagh+-headteacher+-merrill+-thundering+-Exhilarator+-iskolaigazgat%C3%B3&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&scoring=a. Only five of those hits mention ''this'' Kevin Skelton, and in no case is there even a sentence about him - they are simply mentions in cast lists.http://www.ed.nl/specials/kerstconcerten/4155316/Het-Kempenkoor.ecehttp://www.concertonet.com/scripts/review.php?ID_review=4237http://jam.canoe.ca/Theatre/Reviews/O/Orfeo/2006/04/17/1537148.htmlhttp://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-25569891_ITMhttp://www.oxfordstudent.com/tt2004wk6/music/music The other claim of notability is as a published scholar. He appears not to have held any position at an academic intitution, and, of the two published articles listed, one is known to Google Scholar,http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22Kevin%20D.%20Skelton%22%20&um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&sa=N&tab=ns with just three citations listed. This is nowhere near the level of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)