Deletion of ProjectLocker

Comment: As was said above, the provided coverage is almost entirely primary, supporting a feature-list article (which appears to have been created as a coursework task). I am not seeing independent coverage which exceeds passing mentions and indicates |encyclopaedic notability. The original contributor has now copied the article to their user page (including categories, which should be deleted) so their work has been preserved and could be taken through the  process if |reliable 3rd party sources can be identified and added
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG||:WP:AFC||:WP:RS)

Comment: fails .  {{u|Srivassummit}} does seem to have put a lot of work into it but there are virtually no |independent sources.  That considered, I would be in favour of '''moving to draft space
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:RS)