Deletion of Internets (2nd nomination)

Comment: you're AfDing this on the basis of  when about two-thirds of the text in the article is devoted to the effects and reaction to the term? To me this is almost a textbook example of what Wikipedia articles on neologisms ''should'' be like, and while your apparent campaign for better compliance with  is a worthy goal, you seem to be picking some pretty odd articles to wave it at
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NAD||WP:NAD)