Deletion of 2012 Green Bay Packers–Seattle Seahawks game

Comment: The article was created early (September 25) in anticipation of its impact, and the AfD was opened the same day.  Since then, the 2012 NFL referee lockout ended on September 26 and a play in this game has cited as a reason. I personally would have added this to the lockout article, following  until it was time to .  One week after the game is too soon to be conclusive of it's long-term .  It is likely to be notable, and the article here already exists and is reasonable sourced.  While I originally supported a move, I'd probably just wait a few months to determine if anything needs to be done to this article based on its notability and size of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:AVOIDSPLIT||WP:SPINOUT||WP:EFFECT)

Comment: The fateful play will go down in football history, even more so now that it became the straw that broke the camel's back, the event that at last fed everybody up so much that the NFL finally came to their senses and ended the lockout.  As stated above, if there are similar articles about single games with close/exciting/controversial endings, I see no reason why this article should not be allowed to stay, and even less do I see any ways it would potentially violate otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: 2012 NFL referee lockout has 10K of readable prose.  says articles may possibly need to be divided after 50K. With 2012 Green Bay Packers–Seattle Seahawks game being only 5K, there does not appear to be a reason to spinout now, especially when  says "there is no need for haste in splitting an article when it starts getting large. Sometimes an article simply needs to be big to give the subject adequate coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: I don't think this page meets  guidelines. While this game was exciting and the last play was controversial, the game itself doesn't seem to warrant its own article. EDIT: After reading comments below I am switching from "Delete" to "Merge" since the article does contain encyclopedic material. EDIT2: Specifically, I think this (and all other controversial officiating incidents) should be added to a new article at 2012 NFL referee lockout
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I decided to |be bold and spawn a new article from 2012 NFL season#Referee labor dispute to 2012 NFL referee lockout. As you can see there is an 2012_NFL_referee_lockout#Officiating_incidents|Officiating incidents section. I'd like to reiterate that I think the game itself is not notable; only the final play and the referees' ruling is - and only in the context of the labor dispute and use of the replacement officials. If this game wasn't using replacement officials and this had happened, I am very skeptical that anyone would think this game deserved a separate article. '''tl;dr''' I think this article should be merged into the 2012_NFL_referee_lockout#Officiating_incidents|Officiating incidents section of 2012 NFL referee lockout
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)