Deletion of Whynatte

Comment: Clearly this just comes down to what you think notable is. Whynatte is completely independent from Jägermeister, just as Redbull is. As Wikipedia says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable." otability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Highly unencyclopediac, and per ; Wikipedia is not a how-to guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I think this clearly shows why this entry should stay "Although articles should demonstrate the notability of their topics, and articles on topics that do not meet this criteria are generally deleted, it is important to not just consider whether notability is established by the article, but whether it readily could be. When discussing whether to delete or merge an article due to non-notability, the discussion should focus not only on whether notability is established in the article, but on what the probability is that notability could be established. If it is likely that independent sources could be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate unless active effort has been made to find these sources. For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort."   —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/68.154.110.90|68.154.110.90
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)