Deletion of United states v downs

Comment: No indication of importance or significance. It is present in legal databaseshttp://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1181554.html but doesn't seem to be discussed elsewhere. Even with press coverage it would probably fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: it's barely notable, but it ''is'' a 7th Circuit case, http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22United+states+v+downs%22&num=50#sclient=psy-ab&q=%22United+states+v+downs%22+-wikipedia+%2B+7th&oq=%22United+states+v+downs%22+-wikipedia+%2B+7th&gs_l=serp.3...21159.23969.0.25256.6.6.0.0.0.0.147.636.3j3.6.0...0.0...1c.1.9.psy-ab.PR8io2evyEI&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45175338,d.dmg&fp=2997ba6b8a85c4d8&biw=1280&bih=794 has been cited widely within that circuit, and could become notable |in the future, if relied on by SCOTUS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)