Deletion of Robert Kleinberg

Comment: for nominator {{replyto|Triptothecottage}} Google Scholar shows over 8000 citations to his work https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zkvW8FQAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao. In your opinion, is that insufficient to pass #C1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: I'm surprised he's still associate, but with two JACM papers in the last year alone it's certainly not because of inactivity. Maybe he's just overshadowed by having a more-celebrated brother in the same department? Anyway, with 29 papers with over 100 citations each and a Google Scholar h-index of 52 https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zkvW8FQAAAAJ he very easily passes #C1. And if you want more in-depth sources about his life and work (although we don't use those sorts of things as measures for notability of academics) there's always https://windowsontheory.org/2013/03/21/research-life-stories-bobby-kleinberg/ and http://auth.cengr.commonspotcloud.com/academics/teaching/awards/2009/kleinberg.cfm
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: notability does not require that secondary sources that establish notability be used in the page, it only requires that they exist per . Looking at the above it looks like enough sources to establish notability do exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)