Deletion of G. Edward Griffin (3rd nomination)

Comment: whether it's accurate or not his book ''Jekyll Island'' is widely cited on Google Books and there appear to have been sufficient sources in news media to have a biography, solving the primary source problems of prior versions of the article. That some sources are "paysites" has no relevance in policy that I know of; not all editors can read other languages, but we permit non-English sources, for example, and many people connected with academia have access to Nexis and other services. The question is whether such sources are |verifiable, not whether they are trivially accessible
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: As the initiating author, I'd merely like to reemphasize: (1) I recreated the article from scratch, without ever having seen the deleted article, with complete reliance on , , and ; (2) The article was accepted as meeting those standards and restored by the deleting admin, Nihonjoe, on its first pass, and has been substantially stable over the weekend; (3) Yes, it's ''waay'' too early to try deleting this again; (4) The only specific arguments for deletion come from Black Kite, and they are mostly arguments for deleting sources, but even if ''all'' those sources were deleted, there would still be sufficient core in the remaining sources to establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N)