Deletion of Building biology

Comment: if we strictly apply , this must be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per . There is nothing usable in the current article; it relies entirely on primary sources and is written in a non-neutral tone presenting all aspects of the movement in a positive light, even the criticism section is written as a criticism of people who criticise the movement! The articles in other languages don't look any better: the French article is a translation of the English one and has only primary sources; the dutch article is sourced entirely to www.baubiologie.de; and the German article is sourced to some fringy looking books and websites, including one on how electricity and radiation cause stress, again no secondary sources. If enough high quality secondary sources can be found there should be an article under the movement's German name - 'baubiologie' but it needs to be written in a neutral manner: i.e. it is an architectural movement that incorporates some aspects of science and some aspects of pseudoscience. Special:Contributions/192.76.8.82|192.76.8.82
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)