Deletion of The X Factor Fansite

Comment: as per Gogo Dodo's comments above.  Also article contains a great deal of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: non-notable website (A7) and spam (G7). There is no credible indication of notability and the article is overly promotional. The article claims the site has run from 2001 but, whilst the domain name was first registered on 1 July 2001, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.thexfactor.com/ the internet archive (which is patchy for this site) shows it only started being used as an X Factor fansite sometime between February and September 2007 (there is no record beyond 2007 to determine whether it remained so). The article page claims it is "one of the highest trafficked fan sites on the internet today" but http://www.blogtopsites.com/sitedetails_3304.html (which the article links to) shows a only few tens of visits per day, and none at all before 19 July, which is when the Wikipedia articles promoting it started being created. Also recommend a block for the article creator for using Wikipedia as a |vehicle for promotion, |personal attacks (eg http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moxy&diff=prev&oldid=374808439, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_X_Factor_Fansite&diff=prev&oldid=374807372) and |canvassing. Note: this user also appears to edit as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.235.196.187 69.235.196.187 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pyknic56 Pyknic56
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:NPA||WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Fails .  Listed "References" are just explanations of various sections on website instead of references showing notability of website.  Long list of external links are about the The X Factor (UK) show instead of the website.  I was one of the deleting admins and stand by my deletion as the article does not indicate the importance or significance of the website.  Additionally, while this does not have any bearing on a deletion discussion, I think it should be noted that the article's primary author's user name shares the name of a staff person on website's parent company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails  and has a lot of content which is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:SOAP)