Deletion of Charlie Gard treatment controversy

Comment: as it seems to be becoming an important, notable, medical ethics case per . As I read it now, it seems to have been trimmed to make it more encyclopedic, and an article will be needed at some point.  But it will need careful attention as it is is essence a BLP, and to avoid more, non-neutral day-to-day updates
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , with the caveat that editors are welcome to undelete once the child has died and there are considered secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: This is an internationally notable legal and medical-ethics issue, the enduring nature of which has been established, so |NOTNEWS doesn't apply. The White House and Vatican are involved; there may be an attempt to make the boy an American permanent resident. Charlie Gard treatment controversy and Charlie Gard have had over 42,500 hits since 30 June. A merge with the disease isn't appropriate, because it's about parental rights and the individual versus the state, not about the disease
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: It's time  was taken seriously, particularly for grief-porn gossip like this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . This has received widespread international coverage and both Pope Francis and Donald Trump are involved. Apparently, now congressional legislation has been introduced to make Charlie Gard a U.S resident so he can receive this experimental treatment in the U.S.http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/charlie-gard-give-terminally-sick-baby-u-s-residency-say-n781061 The controversy has been widely discussed regarding bioethical issues such as right to die with dignity as well as parental rights. Clean up and fix the article instead of deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . There's a possibility this might become notable, but the existing controversy definitely is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)