Deletion of Donald Dafoe

Comment: as clearly meeting . Verified in the article: "He has written over 160 peer-reviewed articles and he has been on the editorial board of ''Journal of Surgical Research'', ''The Chimera'', and ''Transplantation Science''." I find  a good fit here and he easily qualifies on criteria 1, 5 (see http://www.jefferson.edu/jeffnews/past/00/july/dafoe.html: "Transplant surgeon Donald C. Dafoe, MD, FACS, has been named         the Samuel D. Gross Professor and Chairman of Surgery, Jefferson Medical         College", 2000), and 6 at least. I disagree with the nominators characterization of Cedars-Sinai as not being a "major institution". For  (which includes scientists), 1, 3, and of course 5 are met in my opinion. The man has held two separate named chairs--this should be closed as a '''Speedy Keep''' under  #5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:CREATIVE||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: GS h-index around 30 gives a clear pass of rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Meets  and  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: per  considering position at major (yes, C-S is arguably major) institution.  I have some doubt about claim of "160" peer-reviewed publications: no reliable source for this number is provided, and a search of Pubmed using http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=dafoe%20dc "dafoe dc" or even the less-specific http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=dafoe%20d "dafoe d" yields less than 150.  That said, it's clear that this academic is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: I had similar thoughts--it might suffice to split a WP:SCIENTIST out from --but in the case at hand I think that  fits just fine
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:ACADEMIC)