Deletion of Miran Pastourma

Comment: Verifiable article, meets otability standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per . Clearly bad faith nomination from a user who http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miran_Pastourma&diff=535073681&oldid=535072539 tried to speedy delete the same article before and got reverted. User should be blocked to prevent further |disruption from bad nominations. He should also be banned from proposing other articles for deletion because he clearly does not understand the AfD or any other deletion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:TEND)

Comment: Significant coverage in reliable sources. Meets every notability guideline out there.  , , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SNOW)

Comment: From : {{xt|An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.}} It is clear that the article easily meets the criteria of  because the coverage is significant and the company is clearly established as notable by multiple reliable sources. Therefore this nomination is spurious. Look also at the nominator's vague arguments which are a clear case of  because they are not based on any guideline or policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I would like to point out it is in no way considered a bad faith nomination to XfD an article after a declined CSD. The two processes handle very different aspects. CSD is a speedy deletion of an article that lacks apparent notability from reliable sources whereas an AfD can include articles that have reliable sources but do not meet notability guidelines such as  and . Also, the argument about Nathan's Famous is in no way related to this discussion. |Notability is established article by article. Lastly, Nathan's Famous food is a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ per  so ultimately an incomparable argument. I'm not exactly sure of E4024's intention's but it is bad faith to assume bad faith on solely the grounds of the nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:ROUTINE||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:LISTED)