Deletion of Qeelin

Comment: As the article stands it is blatant  and direct  from http://www.qeelin.fr/site/swf/base.swf - but there are lots of sources on Google News in Chinese and French which don't all look like ads/promotional stuff, though I can't read Chinese and don't really understand French enough. I also see several published sources in Google Books, such as http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Vo0CeOC0Z-IC&pg=PA227#v=onepage&q&f=false 1, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0dXcC9PgiiIC&pg=PA33#v=onepage&q=Qeelin&f=false 2, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qfk5hmn4bnAC&q=Qeelin 3, a long section of French prose on Qeelin http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=y6MBLVICHhUC&pg=PA206&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false here, more French http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cT4tmBkwzEoC&pg=PA134&dq=#v=onepage&q=Qeelin&f=false here, and another in Russian http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YcJgy_P8axEC&pg=PA141&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false here. That's quite a bit of international published coverage for this company, which is why I am leaning keep, despite the immediate reaction to delete it as copyvio/promo
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:COPYVIO)