Deletion of Dr. Sanjoy Mukherji

Comment: per ; the sources- such as they are- do not directly address him as a topic, describe him in purely peripheral ways, and are in any case mostly not RS.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Although there are articles from reliable sources, these are not about the person in question, |so can't be used to establish notability. In terms of good sources about him, there are none online or in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NOTINHERTITED)

Comment: Lack enough media coverage to pass the notability. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there are articles from the Times of India, Economic Times and Bangalore Mirror that are all used as references but none of these are about Mukherji himself- he is merely providing opinion within these lifestyle topic advice articles. Notability has not been established when judged against 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:BASIC)

Comment: I very nearly nominated this for speedy, though I decided it does (just) pass A7. But the lack of gnews and normal search hits is a very strong indicator that this does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)