Deletion of Horcrux (2nd nomination)

Comment: as failing , seems to have no out-of-universe context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: fails lot, And . So far all the keep arguments fail to address policy violations.  Saying this is important to the plot is very silly since we have lot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:WAF||WP:P)

Comment: The google scholar hits establish notability (linguistic and folkloric as well as fictional), few though they are (after weeding out the duds I see 4, maximum 5, that would really count). The notability of the series as a whole fully justifies a  approach to central elements like "Horcrux". My pet peeve just now is people who say "despite the tags nothing has been done for ''x'' months" and then instead of doing something, spend the same amount of time or longer in a fore-doomed discussion like this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)