Deletion of Consciousness after death (science)

Comment: Yes, there are definitely some |point of view issues and not much of a counter-argument section, but to me the article is certainly salvageable and definitely meets , but I don't believe anyone is contesting that. Anyway, I would vote to probably keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:GNG)

Comment: and then '''disambiguate''' between near-death experience and afterlife.  It's a plausible search term so shouldn't be a redlink, but we can't possibly keep this content.  I find it poorly-researched and unreliable.  It omits important qualifiers and misleads by implication.  For example, it says "measurable brain activity ends within 20 to 40 seconds"... and then links a study showing that measurable brain activity ends within 20-40 seconds ''in dogs''.  It says "Some scientists disagree that consciousness is permanently lost after brain death.  James Forberg..." and fails to note that far from being a recognised scientist, Mr James L. Forberg is an engineer, self-described as a "scientist-theologian", whose one book was self-published via Xlibris.  The article is untrustworthy and |synthy and excising it would improve the encyclopaedia.However, I would not object to someone starting a fresh article with this title later.  It's this particular article, and its history, that I feel should be removed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)