Deletion of Hoaxed

Comment: I have looked for substantive mainstream and reality-based commentary on this film, and cannot find any, so its non-inclusion is not ''just'' down to bias on the part of the author, who is basically a  dedicated to promoting Mike Cernovich. IMDB shows zero professional reviews. I can't even find coverage of the removal from Amazon, outside of Breitbart
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: per nom and {{u|Ralbergen}}. The in-depth coverage is in unreliable sources; reliable sources only give passing mentions, which is not enough for a |GNG pass
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:NFILM defers to the  for most subjects, and the  would help it either. The sources currently used in the article are passing references in reliable sources; substantial coverage in unreliable sources (including those that have previously been discussed on ); and primary sources. I can't find any substantial coverage in a reliable source, which the GNG requires multiple examples of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFO||WP:RSN)

Comment: obvious, if light, coverage in secondary sources including 2 published books on right-wing media and the Associated Press, but in particular meets #Inclusionary criteria#2 - "{{tq|significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career}}" - and a reasonable split of content from the Mike Cernovich article. Certainly a lot more about this topic than many other film stubs we have
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)