Deletion of Markus Rothkranz

Comment: Doesn't seem to me like this person comes close to meeting the notability criteria of  or . Yes, the film doesn't appear to exist, but I don't see anything to suggest that the film is notable (as per , and notability of the film itself would play into . I.e., there's no evidence the film was widely released, reviewed by national critics, etc. The TV project went as far as a 3-minute trailer he showed to try to get backing. Never aired an episode
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:CREATIVE||WP:MOVIE||WP:ENT)

Comment: Total lack of reliable sources. At first I considered this a hoax (and I'm still very suspicious of some parts of the article), but he seems to be a real person with a following in the alternative health world. However, aside from mentions on not-in-any-way-reliable-sources CAM websites, I can't find anything to support a pass of the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)