Deletion of Fuad Alakbarov (2nd nomination)

Comment: Heavily |refbombed Wikipedia:Wikipuffery|wikipuffery, but none of the sources has more than a sentence about the subject, and most quote him or are by him rather than about him. No evidence for a pass of . And the analysis above suggests worse, that the references are not merely inadequate but falsified and plagiarized
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article has been sourced well. Subject meets . Passes . Subject had media coverage prior to the event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: mostly just a  of passing references, personal works, and non-reliable sources. The subject failed notability standards the first time this article was created and he doesn't pass them now. This may also be a possible  situation as well. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB||WP:SALT)

Comment: Refbombed article, of which the mentions of him are either primary, unreliable, or nonexistent. Easy  fail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)