Deletion of Bush Derangement Syndrome (3rd nomination)

Comment: well-sourced and verifiable; easily meets the |general notability guideline. The only thing keeping me from calling |bad faith nomination is that at least the nom supported deletion of Obama Derangement Syndrome, so at least we have some impartiality, otherwise the nomination reeks of  regardless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SK||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: reliable sources shine out of the back passage of this article.  Flies past the |usual inclusion criterion without pause.  Historical noteworthy idea.  Our own political allegiences are not criteria for deletion either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Well sourced and verifiable.  and  just aren't very convincing reasons for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:IDONTKNOWIT)