Deletion of 2010s in music (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:GNG|clearly notable, and |not so awful as to be blown up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: an obviously notable topic. However, it is in need of a lot of cleanup. If the problem is systemic, and not limited to just this article (as it seems), it should be discussed in the context of all those "decade in music" articles. It will be great if we could have a guideline page that talks about things to include and how to write them (an RfC might help with that). But we don't. So, let's stick to |fixing the problem for the moment. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM)

Comment: Oh wow, did not expect this. I really just contacted the WikiProject for advice on how to approach cleaning it up. I guess I'm neutral at this point? On one hand, the article is truly in awful shape. On the other hand, I'm not sure how one could possibly argue that a ''decade'' of ''music'' could be not notable, though there could be a good  argument to be made. This really probably warrants a bigger discussion about these "decade in music" articles - it's weird to just delete one, but in my spot-checking, ''many'' of these types of articles are on just terrible shape
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)