Deletion of Xecced

Comment: Currently fails GNG and NCORP. Most of the coverage is PR churnalism and the other coverage isn't enough to put it over the notability threshold. Could be a case of too . Additionally, there is no indication that the significance of being the first AI VC fund or any area-specific fund, for that matter, on any continent or region (or even just being the first AI VC fund in general) is enough to meet notability requirements. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I don't see any strong |reliable sources, just press releases and similar links
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails  and  additionally most of the sources appear to be press releases or other cruft unsuitable to meet our sourcing requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: does not meet  or . We can't build a neutral article on pure churnalism and marketing hype
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: This article has pretty clearly been  |ED. The sources themselves are mostly a combination of PR and funding, from sources that do not seem entirely reliable. The AfrikanHeroes one seems decent enough, but all the rest are either just repeating a company announcement, or are pretty clearly promotional, including the Ventureburn one. Of course, as subsaharan startups are not the most reported on of subjects, I could potentially be missing something. Also, the behaviour of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: Fails . Promotional article whose sources are either press releases or articles about fundraising. Neither establish notability. Article creator is strictly promoting this company (spam added to List of venture capital firms has been reverted) and resorting to personal attacks (i.e., blind accusations of racism in response to GPL93) on anyone who disagrees with her is certainly ''not'' advised
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)