Deletion of Rich Shapero (2nd nomination)

Comment: I've gone and added several more references. With those, I feel that he, rather easily, meets the |notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/09/26/SHAPERO.TMP This gives significant coverage for a start, and http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SJ&s_site=mercurynews&p_multi=SJ&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1036A499DB099429&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM this isn't far behind. Together with ten other mentions, many of which include quotes of his statements, I feel there is enough coverage to meet . BLP appears not to be an issue as all information is neutral and sourced, and  is largely bypassed by the large number of sources mentioning his former career as a venture capitalist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT)

Comment: The references and sources now found for this article provides significant coverage. There is enough to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)