Deletion of Samwise Didier

Comment: to Blizzard Entertainment. Since his contributions are so enduring, there should be no issue paraphrasing them within the existing article on the topic. Ravenswing's analysis is spot on and I'm really surprised to see the lack of critical engagement with his points. As for the ProQuest abstract, https://www.ocregister.com/2012/06/13/blizzards-samwise-sketches-a-career-for-himself/ that article is freely online. I wouldn't call it a profile and I'd note that it's from a local paper. Not seeing what |significant coverage in these links would be used to build a dedicated article on the topic. Most of the actual coverage is about Blizzard art rather than the individual. Merger with |potential to expand is the best compromise of the above points. (not Help:Watchlist|watching, please {{tl|ping
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SS)

Comment: I don't see the problem with keeping the page, as he appears to pass , all four criteria are met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST)