Deletion of Recharge (magazine) (2nd nomination)

Comment: The current tone of the article is not a reason to delete, but for tagging and improvement.  Claims for importance on obscure topics often take the form of praise by third parties, this is hardly surprising.  LAC75 has established notability by the |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It's perhaps a revolutionary notion, but I actually looked at each and every one of the "sources" in the article. They vary from press releases ("source: Recharge"), in-passing mentions (sometimes in an "article" of two lines"), non-independent sources, blog-posts, and whatnot. What I did ''not'' find were |''independent reliable sources''. In short, there is no indication of any notability at all, and after the large effort by editors to find sources, this most probably means that there aren't any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)