Deletion of Steven J. Hill

Comment: this  per  and a host of other policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT||WP:GNG)

Comment: yingykong to determine notability you should see Wikipedia:Notability (people) in particular ,  and . A lot of the sources quoted are primary sources and lack independence. I have had a look at the article and struggle to find anything that helps it across the line other than possibly his start up company. The things I would be looking for are: in depth coverage in major media - ie NZ Herald, Dominion Post, etc for NZ or their overseas equivalents; are there any significant awards; and/or is there any significant achievement. I hope this helps. Also, just because he doesn't meet the criteria at the moment does not mean that he won't in the future. I have also commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Jackson
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: always query any article that uses LinkedIn as a "source". Some of the "sources" provided don't even mention the subject - not even in passing. Not at all |notable as far as I can see
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I haven't checked the sources carefully enough to see if any of them help meet , but I find sending a new user's article to AfD 40 minutes after creation to be somewhat |unhelpful. A better option would have been to tag the article as {{tl|refimprove}} and alert an appropriate Wikiproject so they can have a look at getting better sources. Would it have been a serious threat to Wikipedia for this article to stick around for about another week before being AfDed? You're lucky that the |ARS haven't got this one on their radar
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BITE||WP:ARS)