Deletion of Michael J. Sullivan (mayor)

Comment: an adequate potential for reliable, independent sources. Going to Google and Google News, there were certainly adequate sources upon which the article could draw. Also, the subject meets the standard set at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: passes  and well-covered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Weak Delete''' The original deletion request was made by someone who was blanket proposing deletion of minor mayors of minor cities.  At the time, I opposed the deletion, but after further research, it appears that all the notable things Michael J Sullivan ever did were all done by different Michael J Sullivans.  If  implies that all mayors of all cities should have Wikipedia articles, we have a long way to go to write a lot of articles that don't say much at all, but in that case, I can't support the deletion of this particular article.  Additionally, I understand 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:PAPER)

Comment: Mayor of a reasonably large city (pop. ~73,000) that therefore meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Mayor of a significant city easily meets . Current stub needs work but plenty of sources show up in Google
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)