Deletion of Nick Bell (Australian entrepreneur)

Comment: and '''close''': The page has sufficient  to pass . Also, to note the page was accepted by  and there is no need to move again to draft and again ask another reviewer to view it. The page can be edited to live and there isn't much content to go through AFC again. Nominator's contributions also seems to be with a purpose and he has very clearly overlooked the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:AFC)

Comment: Fails  There seems to be a strong push to get article out of Afd even though there is not a single references about Bell himself, all of them are companies and wholly generic in nature. The first six references are the essentially same. Ref 12 is a raw press release. Ref 10, 7 and 11 are promoting his new company which is against  and don't really help assert notability. Ref 11 reads like a press release. Outside the two companies and his previous work there is no depth of coverage that satisfies . Not a single ref is about him alone and what is there is  business news about his companies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)