Deletion of June 2017 Linz Attack

Comment: This a news event with no lasting notability. It's one murderer of no notability, and speculation that it "may have had Islamist motives" is not enough to justify an article. If, in the future, articles appear that describe the suspect trained in a Daesh terrorist camp or something like that, maybe then it would meet Wikipedia's standards. But as it stands now, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Regardless of whether this is a terror attack or not (right now it is being investigated as the latter), should be irrelevant to the vote rationales on both sides of the discussion. Where is the  impact of the incident? If the answer is just "...well there will be a trial" then you haven't found a good reason to keep this article. Two people were murdered; it is a tragic occurrence, something the news loves to cover, but that ''does not'' mean it is suitable for the encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: per MrX:'' "Article about a murder, written to sound like a terrorist attack. Fails  and " .'' Claims above that the Austrian authorities are treating this as 'terrorist' are false: the'' "same police spokesman said: "the case was being treated as a "double murder" and not a jihadist killing ... We currently don't believe that it was an IS-motivated murder or terror attack," Furtner said" ''this is the source which is being relied on to establish an ISIS connection. A lot of synth or OR is required to bypass such an explicit rebuttal
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YT)

Comment: Also a violation of  as it says the arrested suspect is guilty of murder and terrorist offences when he hasn't been tried yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)