Deletion of Rivigo

Comment: per , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:MILL||WP:SPAM)

Comment: despite heroic effort by article creator. The sources are just lacking in terms of breadth and depth to show meeting GNG. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, after all, and the subject is just not encyclopedic. If anything, the content is more promotional than when DGG tagged it. |One would think AfC would set higher standards than to loose this upon article space. Nice catch by {{u|Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi}} in sending it back to Draft space back when. Not sure  applies-- one need not be "run of the mill" to not meet inclusion requirements for an encyclopedia. {{green|Closing admin, ''nota bene'', does not require SALT. Has NOT been multiply recreated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:MILL)

Comment: A Google search turned up http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/money/rivigo-raises-75-million-in-series-c-funding-from-warburg-pincus/articleshow/55282791.cms this piece in ''The Economic Times|Economic Times'', covering Warburg Pincus's investment of $75 million in the company; the authors of the article appear to be regular ''Economic Times'' contributors.  Warburg Pincus discusses the company on its http://www.warburgpincus.com/investments/rivigo/ own website.  A short http://www.livemint.com/Companies/sBkxMex3yEnvPoX7vzdyBN/Flipkart-Rivigo-in-Interbrands-top-emerging-brands-list.html piece in ''Mint (newspaper)|Mint'', and similar pieces in other Indian media, briefly discuss Interbrand's inclusion of Rivigo on their 2017 "Breakthrough Brands" list.  I think we've got enough attention from wide-circulation Indian media to meet , and enough detail to support a modest article without relying exclusively on company sources and echoes thereof
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)