Deletion of Hacker Time

Comment: No independent sources and also it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: simply put this fails , the claims made that it has ''millions of viewers'' are not |verifiable and if made in the article would be removed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: per GRuban. I tried to find independent sourcing for the show and didn't find anything beyond a bevy of blog-type coverage and one brief mention in a UK newspaper. That said, I can't shake the notion that this should be kept per . I wish I could offer a better policy-based argument. I'm going to keep looking. I will say that  does ''suggest'' that the article's topic is ''likely'' to be notable, and while it (as usual) suggests that standard notability definitions are the more salient basis for any decision, the examples given are very dissimilar from this show (e.g. a national television program being "cancelled too quickly to garner any media attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:TVSHOW)

Comment: as meets . It's a nationally-televised show as evidenced by the source provided (BBC may not be independent in this case but they are considered reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:TVSHOW)

Comment: Wikipedia's notability guideline requires that reliable sources independent of the article subject notice the subject.  In this case the only sources that have been provided or that I have been able to find are from BBC and not independent.  I can not find anything that shows any reliable sources have provided any coverage of this TV show.   only says that a nationally televised show is '''likely''' (emphasis mine) to be notable, not that it '''is''' notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:TVSHOW)