Deletion of Michael Gurnow

Comment: Almost everything you use as an argument for retention is a violation of  alias . I've sold books to :Charlton Heston, :Tony Shaloub, and :Tony Bennett; that doesn't make me notable. I was on :Ben Stein's show, and he said I had a nice singing voice; that doesn't make my singing notable. We need '''''substantive''''' coverage of '''''Gurnow''''' as Gurnow, by |reliable sources; and that's what we don't see any sign of here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTINHERITED||:WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS||:WP:RS)

Comment: subject has requested deletion, which I take on good faith. (IP address he used is from his state. Seems silly to argue it's a fake post. Signature claim is silly, as it's exclusive to Wiki.) Subject does have some coverage http://www.semissourian.com/story/2204147.html etc, but not enough yet for GNG, seems 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Piles of self-published sources and interviews in non-notable venues do not meet the threshold for inclusion spelled out at .  If the subject is requesting deletion then it'd be a slam-dunk per , but we cannot accept random IP users claiming to be the subject.  If someone wishes to encourage the IP to file a request via , that is the way to proceed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:OTRS)