Deletion of List of Pokémon

Comment: They can NOT delete this. Pokemon on Wikipedia just has too much history. Also, @Andrew Davidson does have a point.  is for ''video games''. Pokemon has a bunch of different things, like toys and TV shows.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: Clearly Pokémon is discussed in multiple reliable secondary sources. Either this index list or other detailed lists meet .--Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: WP:GAMECRUFT is a guideline of the videogames project.  I'm not sure it can be considered a proper guideline but, in any case, Pokemon are not just videogame elements; they are also characters in TV and movies; trading cards, physical soft toys and models, &c.  Moreover, the nomination fails to consider the more detailed lists such as List of Pokémon (387–440).  You should start with those before deleting the master list.  The list in question is a true list rather than just being bundles of cruft and so has value as an index per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)