Deletion of Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present)

Comment: Goes without saying, really. The article needs better sources, a cleanup of , and perhaps a small shift in focus but the topic is obviously notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Based on the presented rationale for deletion, this AfD strikes me as disruptive in order to make a . I would also urge {{u|User2534}} to read . With that said, I think it would be valid with an AfD based on  and/or  considering that there is indeed a view among some editors {{tq|that the article is entirely based on  and , and that nothing about it is supported by }} (well, kind of – what I've come across isn't quite that categorical). An argument in favour of deleting the article rather than clarifying (and possibly adjusting) its scope and inclusion criteria might be that Talk:Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present)#RfC on scope|a recent attempt to do the latter failed to reach 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:AGF||WP:DEL6||WP:DEL7||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:RS||WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: Being y and refusing to discuss a controversial edit is perhaps not the best argument for deletion. Nonetheless, there may be a legitimate claim for deletion or at least refocusing the topic of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: to include "List" in the article's title.  The current lede section ("Europe has seen Islamic terrorist activity since 2014.2") has multiple problems, and much of the prose is  or .  The lists in the article should clearly be kept somewhere
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)