Deletion of Vecna

Comment: The connection with Jack Vance alone is enough to make the topic notable - see ''Four ways Jack Vance influenced Dungeons & Dragons'' or ''Advanced Readings in D&D: Jack Vance'' for example.  Our |editing policy then applies and so there is no case for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Merge''' possible) to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities. The article itself fails to establish the notability of the topic, per the complete absence of "significant coverage from multiple reliable independent sources" required by . Sources have been added, but I share Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Vecna|TRPoD's assessment of these being only trivial mentions and not significant coverage, in the AfD talk page
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or redirect. Nothing qualifying for significant coverage of the topic has been provided, so it should be removed unless  and  can be met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WAF)