Deletion of VG Cats (2nd nomination)

Comment: One of the most notable webcomics in existence, has won numerous awards and the focus of http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/05/tech/gamecore/main678332.shtml multiple http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-117501024.html reviews http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/press-release/2007-06-11/venus-terzo-to-be-otakuthon-2007's-guest-of-honor and http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-29391790_ITM other http://media.www.theonlinerocket.com/media/storage/paper601/news/2007/11/09/Focus/Internet.Provides.New.Way.To.Get.Daily.Dose.Of.Funnies-3090548-page2.shtml coverage.  Apart from the article needing cleanup (which AfD is not a mechanism for, since the problems are resolvable by non-deletion methods; I suggest nominator review |BEFORE and |deletion policy), nominator doesn't bring forth any reasons that the article is somehow unsalvagable; in short, no reason to delete is provided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:DEL)

Comment: WP:NOTE|Notability isn't the be-all and end-all of |Verifiability. Just because this article is poorly sourced doesn't mean it's not notable. Certain aspects of this article cannot be sourced extrenally, nor is it required, as far as I understand how original fiction is presented in Wikipedia. Notability is too often being used as a sword, where a pen would be mightier. Special:Contributions/217.132.20.106|217.132.20.106
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)