Deletion of Scottish inventions and discoveries

Comment: Some of the keep votes seem to be based on . Obviously a list of African-American inventors will suffer from the same problems as a list of Scottish ones. If these lists are kept, at least be ruthless about blanking every entry without a reference. It would seem obvious that at least the straight parallels English inventions and discoveries and Welsh inventions and discoveries should be grouped with this AfD. Note that List of Chinese discoveries is different because it deals with Ancient China, i.e. discoveries made by a pre-modern civilization, not by people holding a certain passport. Needless to say, discoveries made by modern researchers who happen to be Chinese would be out of place in a list of discoveries attributed to Ancient Chinese civilization
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: This is evidence of nationalist POV and manifest . Inventions are not attributable to a people, they are attributable to the inventors. If you want to highlight their origin in a neutral way, listify as List of Scottish inventors (which I notice is a redirect). But even in that case, the question remains as to "who is Scottish?" - and I see nobody leaning on the side of caution in such cases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: While there are references, they do not provide notability for this article as they only talk about specific people not the actual topic of the article. So they count for V but not N. Also, this looks like 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)