Deletion of Allan Bligh

Comment: Passes . The nom made a recent Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#RfC_on_NCRIC|failed RfC to remove the said notability requirements. Since then, they have tried to circumnavigate this by making mass redirects instead. The nom has said that they "Special:Diff/995494268|have no beef with Lugnuts", however following their failed RfC, have seemingly gone out of their way to target artciles I've worked on. Another Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_WP:NSPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|RfC on sporting articles closed with the comments "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". And yet, there have been 25+ AfDs logged by Fram in a 15/20 minute window, indicating no  was used
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per . The point of that is that at this level there will be enough reliable sources, it is just a matter of someone putting in the time to find them. The existence of the page is the best trigger for that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Meets . Nominator didn't do a WP:BEFORE to show the opposite. The nominator nominated (automatically) a large amount of cricketeers. It would have been better to made a bunch of them in one nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: fails . Nothing notable about him in my searches. WP:ATD is redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)