Deletion of Samantha brett

Comment: per nom and JzG. Probable / violation; this article is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY||WP:AUTO)

Comment: Her website claims that she's written for "New Woman, Vogue, Vogue Girl, 9to5 Magazine, The Sydney Morning Herald, and the Daily Telegraph" http://www.samanthabrett.com/Content_Common/pg-About-Samantha.seo.  Some of the pages turned up by Google http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Samantha+Brett%22& seem to suggest that she's somewhat notable in Australia, although Amazon doesn't show anything http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/002-1548888-9200033?search-alias=aps&keywords=Samantha%20Brett.  (Maybe her next brilliant book?) But since  only requires an audience of 5000 or more, I think she qualifies -- if just barely. The style of the current article ("dazzled", "catapulted", "positively effervescent", etc.) needs some NPOV and cleanup work though. If the consensus is delete, I'll change my vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)