Deletion of Killing of Abdisamad Sheikh-Hussein

Comment: does not meet  and the coverage is all news reports, i.e. . This does not meet the criteria for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Sorry but the misleading "coverage" listed here, as well as the immediate and short-lived |news surrounding this subject does not convince me. The |notability criteria for events specifies that reports -- even if they are widespread -- on their own are not enough to establish notability. Historical and/or societal significance are indicators. Some editors may argue that those cannot be established with a recent news event and I can argue that the article shouldn't be created in the first place if notability is ''that'' questionable. I wish the criteria for events could be applied more accurately for terrorism-related AFDs but for now I will worry about this individual incident and hope editors come to the proper conclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: per  {{tq| If a matter is deemed notable, and to be a likely crime, the article should remain even if it is subsequently found that no crime occurred (e.g., the Runaway bride case) since that would not make the matter less notable}} - the outcome of the investigation/trial (sane/insane, hate/no-hate, etc.) - has little to do with notability. What makes an event notable - is coverage. In this case - we have copious coverage from around the 2014 event itself (in top-notch sources - including NYT for instance). We also have  coverage various news outlets - http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article38704380.html http://abcnews.go.com/US/kansas-gop-criticized-controversial-isis-themed-flyer/story?id=43197736 http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/6/american-muslims-have-a-race-problem.html http://www.kansascity.com/living/religion/article144397884.html http://www.iexaminer.org/2016/05/opinion-what-exactly-does-islamophobia-look-like/ https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hate-crime-killings-kansas-city_us_58b70869e4b0284854b33ab4https://www.salon.com/2015/09/11/the_terror_after_the_terror_america_still_hasnt_reckoned_with_the_disgrace_of_post_911_hate_crimes/. Books - https://books.google.co.il/books?id=JT5pDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA175&dq=%22Abdisamad+Sheikh-Hussein%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiE4M-oitPXAhUS_qQKHQ3oC6YQ6AEIJjAA#v=onepage&q=%22Abdisamad%20Sheikh-Hussein%22&f=false https://books.google.co.il/books?id=5Q-FCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA133&dq=%22Abdisamad+Sheikh-Hussein%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiE4M-oitPXAhUS_qQKHQ3oC6YQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=%22Abdisamad%20Sheikh-Hussein%22&f=false https://books.google.co.il/books?id=MA7MDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA290&dq=%22Abdisamad+Sheikh-Hussein%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiE4M-oitPXAhUS_qQKHQ3oC6YQ6AEIMjAC#v=onepage&q=%22Abdisamad%20Sheikh-Hussein%22&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:LASTING)

Comment: with apologies to editors whose patience I am trying, I have been trying to get this right.  Because the coverage was international at the time of this vehicle-ramming attack; because it was a deliberate attack on persons leaving a Muslim house of prayer by a perp whose anti-Islam views were written all over his SUV (whether perp was Christian or Muslim;) an dbecause of ongoing coverage like this reported 2017 article https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hate-crime-killings-kansas-city_us_58b70869e4b0284854b33ab4 3 Years, 5 Horrific Hate-Crime Killings In The Kansas City Area, this murder-by-vehicle meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: per {{u|TheGracefulSlick}}. Such news coverage falls under  and we can't have stand-alone articles based on this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: u|Icewhiz}} I have no comment on notability yet but please do not try to use namedrops and passing mentions as proof of "lasting coverage". Literally, all those sources briefly mention the incident and are about another more notable subject or incident. Of course, there was coverage soon after the killing -- that fits nicely into . Regardless, I am sure this article will be kept because enough editors will take your listing here at face value rather than actually evaluate their lack of depth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  for both the victim and the perpetrator; the event itself is not notable as of now and this appears to a sad but routine thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)