Deletion of Hamis Kiggundu

Comment: I believe that without abandoning   this  should be  on grounds that: '''''(1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: verging on '''delete'''. This article needs heavy pruning or even . It has the worst case of  I have seen - which AFD participant is going to assess all ''75'' citations to sift any wheat from the chaff? The Hamis Kiggundu#Court Battle section is pure trivia, about a lawsuit which was filed in February 2020 and hasn't come to court yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:REFBOMBING)

Comment: verging on '''delete'''. I'd theoretically like for the article to stay, but if it does, it is in need of some serious editing. The information is disorganized, the prose needs heavy copy editing for grammar and tone, and (as has been addressed) the references are a bit of a mess. That being said,  might be in order
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)