Deletion of Olivia Pierson

Comment: I came to this after the article had already been restubbed into something that basically doesn't even make any real notability claim ''at all'' anymore, so I want to clarify that I did look at the prior edit history — and what I'm seeing in it is largely |primary sources, problematic sources like ''Refinery29'' and ''Daily Hive'', and glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage of other things, all |reference bombing an advertorial that reads like it was written by a PR agent. I suppose it's ''possible'' that a good article could be written about her — I doubt it, but I don't know nearly enough about the "knockoff Kardashian wannabes" genre of television to say for sure — but that article wasn't it. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do it ''right'', but no version of the article to date has represented anybody doing it right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: heavily refbombed and given the subject matter, likely to be undisclosed |paid-for spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:UPE)