Deletion of 13th GMA Dove Awards

Comment: The only citation is a non-independent . A Google search turned up two newspaper clippings, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/33883900/1982-gma-dove-awards-preview/ 1 and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/33851013/1982-gma-dove-awards/ 2 from ''The Tennessean'', the first of which is effectively an advertisement. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCE||WP:GNG)

Comment: Ping|Walter Görlitz}}, What's the notability related to then? There isn't currently any solid guidelines about the notability of ceremonies or awards from my understanding. So it goes to the  guidelines. Which requires the use of references. Otherwise, any ceremony or award would be notable by default, no matter how mundane it might be. I'm not even saying the ceremony itself isn't notability anyway, I'm just saying this particular article about it isn't. Those are two different things. If there's going to be a spin off article of a subject it has to be justified. An essentially blank page isn't. Wikipedia isn't a directory
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is only one primary source in the external links. Only one independent secondary source has been presented in this AfD https://www.newspapers.com/clip/33883900/1982-gma-dove-awards-preview/. However this seems to be a routine announcement, which is akin to public relations. It is not significant coverage. This is not enough to demonstrate notability. Please see . Multiple independent sources that provide significant coverage are needed. Saying there might be sources somewhere or there should be sources somewhere does not demonstrate notability. Fails GNG, NMEDIA, ORG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)