Deletion of Julie Eadeh

Comment: This individual seems to be the exemplar of why  exists. Contrary to the article creator's assertion, being a career diplomat does not make one a public person. But as there is no accusation of a ''crime'' detailed in the article,  does not apply (I bring this up as the nominator cited that in edit summaries on the article and I don't think it's actually relevant here). That said, as every bit of notability she has stems from her meeting with Demositso, an the publicity that garnered, she's only notable for one event, which makes her inappropriate for an independent article. However, there's ample reliable coverage of her involvement in this notable event within the Hong Kong protests for inclusion of any relevant and reliably sourced material to be included there. I should note that there is ''substantial'' Chinese language coverage in a ''variety of sources'' that mention her. It's all about this event. The argument that the content itself violates -REASON #9 seems like over-reach. However there's no evidence of ''independent'' notability. Finally, a word of caution, as the creator of this article is an SPA with a strong POV, I'd recommend that when content regarding this event is merged into the appropriate article, that it be done through consultation at article talk and / or at /N prior to inclusion in main space. BLP is a complicated area of Wikipedia, and new users frequently run afoul of expectations there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:DEL||WP:BLP)

Comment: fails ,
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:BASIC)