Deletion of Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Comment: I am unable to assess the Polish-language cites so I will defer to opinions above.  However, I live in Vancouver and can say that the event broadcast by "Shaw Cable" possibly had fewer viewers than have contributed to this page; public-access television is not a citation that evokes the kind of editorial control that I would expect from a |reliable source.  I haven't found anything in  local sources that indicates this individual has any |notability at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: I think there is insufficient coverage of him for a Wikipedia article, per . Some fairly obscure sources have been milked of all they had to get article where it is now. I realize this is a judgment call to some extent, and others will disagree, as they had in the past. His wiki-relationships inevitably color who !votes which way in the various AfDs and DRVs on this matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: being fairly familiar with the subject from when I closed the last AFD (and I won't be doing ''that'' again!), and upon re-reviewing, I have to say that I find the arguments for Tylman's notability to be unconvincing.  I don't see how he meets  at the current time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: lack of coverage in any major sources indicates he probably isn't notable per  regardless of any claims to awards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: poet who appears to be primarily or entirely self-published.  Not even remotely close to passing , , or any other relevant guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: I commented earlier but did not vote.)  I'm certain Tylman is a very talented artist, and otherwise a good human being.  However, without sufficient coverage in |reliable sources the content of this article cannot be independently |verified. I could not find enough evidence to support |notability, in general, or as an |artist. (I also want to wish Mr. Tylman the best in this recent legal issue; he was the victim of a libelous defamation of character. This should not be tolerated, and should certainly be pursued legally.) Best wishes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:VERIFY||WP:BIO||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: I participated in the previous AfD, where I also !voted "delete". I have been asked to participated in this one by Cunard (although his note above indicates that he notified all the participants of the previous AfD). Too little specific and detailed coverage of him for passing  and not enough to show notability under . The only individual award mentioned in the article is ''Grand Owl '' which seems to be a student level award. No significant published reviews of his work are mentioned in the article. I looked up the library holdings for some of his books in Worldcat and they appear to be rather minimalhttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48610293http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48610545http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48610280.  Also, this is a  case, and, per , autobiographies on Wikipedia are "strongly discouraged", which gives an additional impetus towards deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE||WP:AUTO||WP:AUTO)

Comment: Phil Bridger's explanation of the Polish language sources and rationale to delete are convincing. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)