Deletion of Laurina Fleure

Comment: one of those people famous for being famous.  A Google search at first seems to pick up loads of coverage, but when you look into it I'm not sure that much of it is reliable; mainly gossip magazines and the celebrity inserts in newspapers, neither of which I think meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as article creator): the subject passes  #1 as having a significant role in two different shows. She came third in ''Celebrity'' while in the ''Bachelor'' she was (according to the Daily Mail) ""http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2786074/He-s-puppet-Bachelorette-Laurina-Fleure-says-The-Bachelor-Blake-Garvey-wasn-t-authentic-believes-thing-bulls.html one of the most popular contestants" She has more than 1000 hits on GNews, and even if most of them are tabloids it still indicates a significant impact well above that of the average reality show contestant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: or perhaps redirect to either ''The Bachelor Australia'' or ''I'm A Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here''.   The article as it stands only has one secondary source, so delete, but yes there is heaps of guff about her.  So however meets GNG  it seems just because she is a very little bit famous for being a very little bit famous.  Her show appearances do not need to get her over the line.  GNG does not need to have any remarkable events or achievements, just IRS to demonstrate notability and verifiability, and able to support a reasonably comprehensive article.  I suggest the article creator turns the article into an in-depth multiply referenced article asap.  As it stands the article's content does not demonstrate any notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)