Deletion of Paget, Ontario

Comment: as a distinct, populated location. This is a case where |verified existiance ''is'' |notability per Wikipedia's remit as a gazzeeteer and per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I don't think that anything at Unorganized North Sudbury District would (or even should, perhaps), discuss this particular place - will its map and coordinates be shown (e.g.?). Many places are not separated by census bureaux but that does not detemine their notability. Most unincorporated US places are not separately enumerated by the census bureau but keeping them has been the norm for years, due in part to their inherent notability (see , ) and WP's gazetteer purpose (see ). Why practice in Canada should differ from that applied elsewhere in the world hasn't been satisfactorily articulated; and I submit that the burden is on the nominator and those advocating an exception to demonstrate the value of that. In the several days this AFD has been pending, the burden has failed to be met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:NGEO||WP:FIVEPILLARS)

Comment: per . It has been proven as a populated place at one point, and therefore should probably have an article at the English Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)