Deletion of Andrew Goldberg (surgeon)

Comment: WP:PAID|undisclosed paid-for spam with no evidence of notability either under  or . Most of the current sources are passing mentions, name checks and thus don't confer notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: A distinguished author, professor, researcher, surgeon and scholar, right?  When we routinely keep subjects such as Ahmad Eisa Kamil|this, for people who just kick a ball, the notability guidelines are clearly inconsistent and lack sense and so we should ignore them and follow |policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: per  spamcruft; also wholly endorse GSS's analysis. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLINKEDIN)

Comment: Has the bare minimum citations to fulfill  for his field https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=WwVSF4kAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra. Sum this up with Most Excellent Order of the British Empire award and I believe it is decent keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)