Deletion of Interlachen, Oregon

Comment: per  and
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: and expand per {{u|SportingFlyer}} and my expansion, and the availability of coverage in newspapers.com. (to which I have a full subscription, if you need me to look something up). This article about a 90-year-old community is a victim of "recentism" and "can't find it on the internet". Sources exist. Redirecting to Fairview, Oregon|Fairview is inappropriate. It may get annexed to Fairview eventually and can be merged then. Failing "keep", merge to Multnomah County, Oregon|Multnomah County. Full deletion is silly. It appears that the gazetteer function of the wiki and the GNIS term "populated place" are now up for debate, which is fair, but in my 10+ years of editig and 100s of articles I have started on various Oregon podunks (and I do argue for deletion on random Oregon podunks, like Blue Bucket Cow Camp, Oregon), I have never seen an article where it is proven people ''actually live'' deleted. FWIW, Oregon has some wacky land-use laws. Yes this !vote is full of AFD:NOT or whatever that advice is about how not to argue at an AfD. Feel free to take me down about . Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: per {{U|SportingFlyer}}'s additional sources showing its community status. As long as significant coverage exists in independent, secondary, reliable sources, it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)