Deletion of White House Jesuit Retreat Center

Comment: I'm afraid this fails two of our basic pillars,  and . While I'm quite sure it  was not written with any intention to advertise, it comes across as unacceptably promotional in tone, partly because of the liberal use of "insider" terminology ("Our Lady" and the like); it's also virtually all unsourced. I find it surprising that no better sources have been found for an institution almost a century old. https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=%22White+House+Jesuit+Retreat%22&offset=1 A search of newspapers.com gets 39 hits; looking quickly through them, I don't see anything that is more than a passing mention or a routine announcement (it received money, someone was on the board, it held a retreat for emergency service personnel and so on); perhaps someone else will find more, but at the moment it does not seem that it is  – there just isn't the in-depth coverage that would provide material for an article about it. Note: the page is shorter than it was, as I have removed a good deal of content copied more or less directly from its website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:neutrality||WP:verifiability||WP:notable)

Comment: a valuable addition to the pedia. Interesting read. And I'm certainly no priest--oh to the contrary. Independent RS here http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/faith-and-values/white-house-jesuit-retreat-house-hosts-homeless-for-first-time/article_906d02c7-a753-5356-b195-a26fda68577c.html and http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/faith-and-values/white-house-jesuit-retreat-center-taps-new-lay-leader/article_456388df-85d0-57ca-80e1-e7687dbd4244.html. And John, your |personal attacks against JZSJ are getting a little tired, don't you think?&ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)