Deletion of James Joyce Pub Award

Comment: per nom. Non-notable advertising guff. Fails ,  and . A  search returns no independent coverage of the subject in its own right. A search on one of the main newspapers of record in Ireland (Irish Times), for example, returns https://www.irishtimes.com/search/search-7.4195619?q=%22James+Joyce+Pub+Award%22 just two results. Both are just trivial passing mentions. And one of the two results only mentions it to call it out as a form of https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/crassness-disguised-as-culture-1.1153712 "crass" "advertisement". A search on the website of the main broadcaster in Ireland (RTÉ), also returns just https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Arte.ie+%22James+Joyce+Pub+Award%22&oq=site%3Arte.ie one trivial passing mention. And this, again, only mentions the subject to decry it as rubbish: https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2018/0607/968915-finding-the-most-authentic-joyce-pub-for-bloomsday/ "You can buy a plaque with Joyce's head and some guff about an authentic Dublin pub award on the internet for €395.00". The PROD was seeming denied back in 2011 on the basis of a technicality. That the PROD tag used was for companies. And that the subject (essentially a product) couldn't be PROD'ed as a company. That may have been the right approach at the time. But there is no way that should have a bearing on a fullsome AfD review. PROMO, VER, COI, SPA and other concerns also abound. Mine is a very firm "delete" recommendation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPRODUCT||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per nom as |not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)