Deletion of Queen Victoria Primary School

Comment: Once again, notability is subjective and is not a primary criterion for Wikipedia articles. Ignoring that for a moment, it would also be astonishing to argue that a century-old school and village landmark is less notable than, say, It's The Gay Pumpkin, Charlie Brown|a single episode of ''Will & Grace''. But here we are again taking up arms against the real world just because its underrepresented on Google. Let me repeat the very first heading under the official policy  "Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. This means that there is no practical limit to the number of topics we can cover other than verifiability and the other points presented on this page." Is there any doubt that a great deal could be written from verifiable sources on a primary school in operation since 1897?  Certainly more than could ever be said about Ellen Feiss or Loituma Girl. The consensus relative to "Wikipedia is not an Indiscriminate collection of information" refers to TYPES of articles (FAQs, Travel Guides, Memorials, Instructions, Plot summaries) and does not address notability, for which there exists ONLY the proposed guideline for use as reference
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: more non notable primary schools than you can shake a stick at.  Please, someone, show me a notable one.  Dont wave proposed guidelines at me, nor Ofsted reports.  Just show me a real notable one.  Which this just is not.  What it is is indiscriminate information and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)