Deletion of Tiger Airways Australia

Comment: The information regarding the companies' parent Tiger Airways in respect of it's Australian expansion is already well documented there. There is no need to repeat this information in a new article which will essentially repeat the same information, not withstanding the companies planes will likely carry the same call signs as the Singaporean parent. I cite the deletion debate for Acer Computer Australia, which was exactly the same scenario and was merged into Acer and then deleted. This is not withstanding significant  issues in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Adding the {{future}} tag does mitigate issues over  somewhat, so long that all remaining points are adequately sourced. We can and do write articles on "planned" stuff, some of which never materialise, but that alone can hardly be primary motivation to delete an article, for the planning process and debate can be encyclopedic too. May I also note that we regularly have articles on subsidiaries, including fully-owned ones. This is a ''subsidiary'' of Tiger Airways incorporated in Australia, and not merely an extension of its operational services or an operational branch of the parent company incorporated in Singapore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: the article needs a major rewrite, and there ''are'' slightly worrying  aspects, but there are several sources that indicate this will certainly go ahead: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21388636-23349,00.html The Australian and http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/tiger-airways-sets-up-aussie-subsidiary/2007/03/19/1174152950663.html The Sydney Morning Herald. It's mostly owned by Singapore Airlines, and has actually operated in Australia since 2005 (Singapore to Darwin), and this article refers to the Australian subsidiary which was incorporated last month. I would say with some sources like the ones I have mentioned, this is notable enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per  ... recreate ''after'' they start operations. &mdash;{{user|68.239.79.97
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: this company is not even operating yet, and most of the article is mere speculation.   certainly applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)