Deletion of Laura Nader

Comment: I've added her long list of published books to the article, but there are many http://worldcat.org/search?q=au%3ALaura+Nader&fq=+dt%3Arec+%3E&qt=advanced audio and http://worldcat.org/search?q=au%3ALaura+Nader&fq=+dt%3Avis+%3E&qt=advanced video publications as well, not to mention many http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=author:l-nader journal articles that have been cited by other academics.  While I |have faith in the nom., I also hope that recent improvements to the article mean this can become an uncontested .  ''Agent 86'', do you have any further concerns about the notability of the subject or with how the article covers the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:FAITH||WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: Give me a break, it only mentions she's his sister, it doesn't claim she's notable because of that.  She's not.  Did you even try to look her up, or did you just assume that the reason the article was written was because she's Ralph Nadar's sister?  The article asserts notability, no indication by nominator of how it fails to meet , Nadar is the subject of articles, not just the author, so it does meet .  Being related to another notable person does not impart non-notability in and by itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: assertion of importance ("Nader edited and published essays from these conferences as well as authoring several books on the anthropology of law, establishing herself as an influential figure in the development of the field.") is unreferenced, and the bio is partly http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/information/biography/klmno/nader_laura.html copyvio. Seems like she would pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)