Deletion of Coming Persecutions

Comment: I looked through  and there is nothing that opposes inclusion of content of this kind. And given how well-sourced it is, it obviously meets notability guidelines. We already treat other topics from the gospels (eg Genealogy of Jesus) and single verses (eg But to bring a sword, New Wine into Old Wineskins), so why not this? Honestly, if I changed the section titles, I think it would go a long way towards making it more amenable to others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: My only worry would be that such a thorough piece of work amounted to something more than the sum of the parts - ie was |original research.  That would be the case if there was an agenda going on here, but there doesn't seem to be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: If you look at the sources, they are mostly from the SAME places, just different pages. They mostly cite the opinions of commentators on it. Also avoid  arguements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: While I'm not in agreement with this particular aspect of the policy,  contains a proscription of "annotated texts", which this appears to be to me.  Unless I'm misinterpreting what is meant by the policy in context.  So, unless it is felt that this article is important enough to  (I don't personally think it is), then it should be deleted.  Alternatively, the article could possibly be edited so that it was not in the format of an annotated text, at which point I would change my opinion to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IAR)