Deletion of List of Regular Show characters

Comment: or '''merge''', per  and  this should not have been brought to AFD at all. This is a notable series that obviously requires description of its characters, and there is no section at all in the parent article. The questions of whether a  is merited, what is an appropriate level/detail of coverage, and what can be sourced to the series itself and what would require secondary sourcing, are all for ordinary editing and discussion to resolve. Instead we're wasting our time on a process that has no application here, because at most this would be redirected to the parent article (again, see policy at ), brought by a nominator who has not even bothered to raise the question on either relevant talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:SPLIT)

Comment: because it just needs cleanup. I echo what the above user said about the notability of the series, the question of the necessity of the split, and the |trouting for using AFD for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: albeit with total sympathy for the nominator's argument. The article is easily ten times the length it needs to be, and has probably a tenth of the sources it would ideally have. But a list of characters is needed, either in the parent article or in a separate list, and per  it's reasonable to split it off for size reasons (the parent article is at 56k, and with even a massively reduced version of the list merged it would certainly top 60k, which is the point at which the information page suggests a split is likely to be needed). So although some serious pruning is needed, it isn't really the case that even an appropriately cut-down version of the list "could easily be covered in ... the overall article". &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SIZESPLIT)