Deletion of Death of Philip Gale

Comment: per .  This guideline states the following
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: move to Philip Gale, and strip the coatrack. I think the sources provided are sufficient to produce a biography that for this person that satisfies our notability requirements. The argument that this is  are well-taken, but I disagree. His notability was not solely due to his suicide but also his software development, and ties to Scientology. While it is discouraging that people wish to use the biography as a coatrack against Scientology, there has been informed commentary regarding it, and therefore do not think that it should be deleted. Move needed because the article is not only about his death
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: This is an obvious keep per GNG.  The compassion shown on this page and in the nomination is laudable, but we should not delete it per |IAR.  Encyclopedias don't work on compassion.  '''BE'''——'''Critical'''__
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: I count 10ish (I may have double counted a reference) reliable sources that specifically talk about his death and span a 6 year timeframe.  Additionally he as a person fulfills the .   On wikipedia neutrality does not mean censored, it means that the editors are faithful to the reliable sources.  Six of those sources talk about how people tied his death to his involvement with Scientology.   a failure of POV in this case would be to whitewash these sources from the page, and not mention how reliable sources are talking about how his death may have been caused from his involvement in Scientology.  The death itself is significant, has had a lasting impact in reliable sources, and the page layout provides  by talking specifically about his death and then having a aftermath section which is in length proportional to the reliable source distribution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NPOV||WP:WEIGHT)

Comment: Given the event's coverage from a significant number of |reasonably sourced references, event appears to have meet  by a good margin. Whether the article needs to be improved to meet  is up to those who are actively editing the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Obviously meets . The article as it stands has no less than 18 sources. Deep and continuing coverage (as evidenced in the "Impact" section) meets , . The nom seems |not to like it but gives no policy- or guideline-based reasoning for the deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INDEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment:  I went through several News Indexes and cant find anything prior to his suicide about ''him.'' I also checked a few Academic computer science databases as well... nothing to indicate any notability as programmer. So  seems to apply here. Also as it written'' it is a Biography'' It would need a fundemental rewrite to be an  since its all about ''him'' and not ''his death
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:EVENT)