Deletion of Pseudoarchaeology

Comment: much as I hate citing , it would seem to apply here. Seems like lots of , though no comment on bias since the article is quite long and wordy. I also note that the title follows , as mentioned on the talkpage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:RS||WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: Sources indicate this is a notable topic: books like Feder's and the listed articles establish notability. The title is a well-known term. If the nominator's main concern is with the article name, there are procedures for discussing that. And  makes it clear that articles on fringe ideas should concentrate on accurately reporting the opinion of mainstream experts, e.g. if all the mainstream sources say it's nonsense, it's ok for the article to say so. Despite what the proposer thinks, there is no requirement for an article to be largely favorable towards its subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)