Deletion of Touché (2nd nomination)

Comment: to Fencing#Terminology per Serpent's Choice. And yes, merge is indeed a normal outcome at AfD. And yes, a  proposal process does exist to gather consensus over controversial merges
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGE)

Comment: to Fencing#Terminology.  Other than the one-line non-fencing use of the term, which truly is Wiktionary material, everything here is already there.  This probably meets |speedy keep criterion 1 on a literal reading (as the nominator does not desire deletion), and I'm often a pretty big advocate for closing these things out early when possible.  However, since at least one past redirection was reverted, there's probably no harm done in employing this venue to judge consensus, since it's already here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)