Deletion of Magnificent Seven (business schools)

Comment: just marketing crap sourced to crappy blogs, a Forbes contributor, and the schools themselves, that has been spammed into each of the relevant business school pages as well as this page being created, all by a determined user named "M7bswiki" (now https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGenericusername9631&type=revision&diff=858124875&oldid=858120454 renamed to {{noping|Genericusername9631}}. I had, btw, tagged this for speedy deletion as spam, and M7bswiki, in violation of the  policy, stripped the tag https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magnificent_Seven_%28business_schools%29&type=revision&diff=858117743&oldid=858106867 here.   Universities ''themselves'' (and their contractors) as well as alum are some of the most tenacious abusers of WP for promotion; their reputations are their main selling point and they see WP as a vehicle for saying How Great They Are.  We have an essay just for them: . This is entirely typical of that genre
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:SPEEDY||WP:BOOSTER)

Comment: Reviewing strictly for notability, this fails . The references included on the page are not reliable. Even the Forbes piece is written by a contributor so it needs to be taken more of an opinion piece than a reliable source. The others are not independent as they are from university websites who are part of the terminology. I found a few references such as https://www.ft.com/content/c97126be-fd26-11e7-9b32-d7d59aace167 Financial Times which verify the term is used, but there is nothing out there that gives any depth to the term to meet notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)