Deletion of List of Obama first family vacations

Comment: Is it ing yet? Special:Contributions/Active_Banana|''Active
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: On several grounds:  and  for starters. Claims that the Obama vacations have been controversial are not particularly true, any more than any detail of his personal life (or any other presidential vacation) is under the microscope. What's next "List of brands of clothes worn by Michelle Obama" or "List of famous people who have visited Obama White House"?  If the vacations are "in the news" it's only because they are on vacation right now, which speaks to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LIST||WP:RECENT)

Comment: as severe POV nonsense, and an obvious attempt to portray a political opponent as AWOL, despite the point made above that Bush took four times as many days of vacation per year. While it is somewhat interesting to see how many ways made-up attacks can be directed at Obama, Wikipedia should not amplify the attempts. If this topic is of any verifiable significance, it can be covered in one sentence in another article. Also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: No other such articles exist for any other President, or "first family", or any other person at all. This is plainly a  for a subtextual political message
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per . '''Merge''' the summary paragraph to Public image of Barack Obama
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Seriously! Where do I start? |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, |nor a news service. There is no |notability to someone's family holiday, however notable that person may be and the whole thing is an |unnecessary content fork which gives |undue weight to a very minor aspect of the lives of people who are notable, but not for taking holidays. Each trip is probably worthy of a sentence at most in the articles on Barack and Michelle Obama
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N||WP:CFORK||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: I think the best policy here to apply is . This is something that, while receiving coverage in the media, sure, just isn't encyclopedic. Its tabloidish stuff that nobody down the line is going care about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The tile is contradictious, how can we have a list of something, what happens only once. There is only one "first family vacation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)