Deletion of Notarize (company)

Comment: The article creator Timtempleton is relying on  to prove the article sources are reliable and independent. However the analysis above based on the newer standard , which the editor seems inclined not to use, shows that most of the sources are of the very low-quality churnalism type, or are dependent interview types, completely breaking NCORP. The first task of any article is to enable validation per . There is no indication in the sources or the text that this company is notable, it is merely a list of operations for a new private startup
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:V)

Comment: I'm surprised this is still but I see the same poor references still being posted that assert, for the most part . Looking at the first ref of Cunards above. The first fails , another dependent source, interview style. ''Notarize director of marketing Ryan MacInnis told The Jerusalem Post
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND)