Deletion of Princess Protection Program (3rd nomination)

Comment: see first two gNews hits at http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=K2d&um=1&tab=wn&nolr=1&q=%22Princess+Protection+Program%22&btnG=Search+News. Looks like it finally has enough ''verifiable'' speculation to not be |crystalballery
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: and tag for cleanup and expansion. While the current article is poorly sourced (no offense to the author), a http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Princess+Protection+Program%22&aq=f&oq= cursory search seems to indicate that there is enough out there to easuily meet the guideline of . This means that deletion should be taken off the table
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)