Deletion of Dragonborn (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: The very few secondary sources that mention this fictional race are the very definition of trivial.  Many of them are nothing more than reviews for products they appear in, that do nothing but confirm that they appear in them.  Even the books mentioned above are, as described by Zxcvbnm, extremely brief coverage of them that do not indicate any real world notability, and merely establish that 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: or redirect - Current reception is a trivial mention. Nothing in the article satisfies 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Does not fail''''' .  Meets all requirements.  '''"Secondary sources"''' are given.  They are "'''reliable'''", "'''independent'''", and most of all has '''"significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Reptilian humanoid per above comments since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)