Deletion of Regina Bateson

Comment: fails  and .  She has left academia without sufficient publication record to make her notable as a scholar, has, as yet, no achievements as a politician,  and does not appear to have attracted SIGCOV for any other reason
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I'd request in future that the nominator actually write his own nomination statement, instead of copying and pasting one of mine verbatim from another discussion about somebody else — it's not so much that I'm offended at all, as that it can create the appearance that you didn't really evaluate the situation very carefully, but just "templated" your way through a situation that looked equivalent on the surface. But at any rate, it is true that people do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they haven't won yet — and as of today she isn't even that yet, but is merely a candidate in a ''primary'' that hasn't happened yet, which is even ''less'' of a basis for notability. But this doesn't demonstrate any strong evidence that she had preexisting notability for other reasons, as her academic career is referenced entirely to |primary sources (press releases from the universities she's been affiliated with and one of her own Twitter tweets), not to the |reliable source coverage it would take to make her ''notable'' for that — and the volume of campaign-specific coverage shown here is ''not'' enough to make her candidacy a special case over and above everybody else's candidacy, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: an IP editor has removed all mention of her Congressional candidacy, which arguably makes this worse per notability;  clearly isn't met, and the remaining refs aren't independent (largely being press releases of schools she is affiliated with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: One well-cited review paper is a good sign for the future of her academic career, but is not enough by itself for #C1. A dissertation award and a best-paper award are also not enough for #C2; we need something that recognizes her accomplishments more broadly and isn't based only on student work. Her work in the foreign service and her run for congress are not enough for . And a Q&A in a small local paper (the only source published independently of her and her employers that our article lists) or other |routine newspaper coverage of her campaign http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article204779874.html http://www.auburnjournal.com/article/2/21/18/regina-bateson-eyes-south-placer-key-beating-congressman-tom-mcclintock http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-congress-democrats-mcclintock-20171119-story.html is not enough for . We can certainly revisit this case if her political campaign succeeds or she moves forward in her academic career, but for now a lot of things that don't individually add up to notability means no notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG)

Comment: As an academic that has been published several times, which have received prestigious awards in her discipline I would suggest keeping this page to reflect her academic accomplishments. These awards are considered prestigious in her disciplines. True that publishing alone is not sufficient enough for notability standards, but the accolades those publications should elevate her. Perhaps strip any references to her public service career. But anything referencing her political campaign should be removed. Criteria in  states: "Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." She meets at least one condition, condition "2", with two of the highest awards given from the premier journal communities in her disciplines. If these awards do not fully fulfill condition "2" (for their national or international qualifiers) then that is a different story.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/2600:1700:6BA0:D240:304B:5E63:8DAC:ABF9|2600:1700:6BA0:D240:304B:5E63:8DAC:ABF9
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)