Deletion of Boycott of Danish items

Comment: It may be that this article is too specific and needs to be merged into Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons; however, I do not believe that contributors to this article were necessarily pushing an agenda, even if the existence or contents of the article are judged to violate .  Personally, I understand "listcruft" to be a reason for deletion only when the article ''is'' a list, while this article merely includes one, along with a timeline, pictures, and an introduction/overview.  It also appears to me that most of this article is verifiable, if not yet verified.  Deletion or merging may still be the best options, though. Participants in the boycott and the "Buy Danish" (makes me hungry) counter-boycott campaign will probably consult List of Danish companies, so this article is unnecessary and inferior from the point of view of somebody pushing an agenda regarding Denmark. In response to Deiz: I don't think it is an attack page, it does not appear to encourage the boycott, and removing relevant factual information from an article is not a good idea
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)