Deletion of Shahid Buttar (4th nomination)

Comment: Seems pretty clear case of ; would consider changing my !vote in the future if he ran for any other notable office. I too am troubled by the  issues outlined above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:PAID)

Comment: Not every candidate that runs in an election becomes automatically notable for receiving routine election coverage. Delete again per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: He's not notable apart from the campaign, and he's only notable because he challenged a prominent lawmaker. The article is small enough I don't see any reason why we can't merge and redirect to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in California, since we don't normally keep articles for losing candidates per //the time-honoured idea many losing candidates slink back to private life pretty quickly. The article isn't that long, and we can properly cover him in the context of the election on that page without losing any important information, but I don't think he's notable enough for a standalone article by a wide margin
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per {{u|SportingFlyer}} above. Losing candidates do not meet , sustained coverage ended post-election, unlikely to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:10YT)

Comment: and '''Merge''' content to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in California#District 12. Per {{u|SportingFlyer}} above. Losing candidates do not meet , sustained coverage ended post-election, unlikely to pass . If you want to keep the information about the candidate, help improve the existing article about the congressional race
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:10YT)

Comment: repeating the statements I made in the last AfD, Buttar has clearly received an exceptional level of coverage for multiple different reasons, receiving national coverage over a period of many months, which your average congressional candidate just does not have, meaning that he clearly passes . Examples of this coverage includes https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/473349-pelosi-gets-progressive-primary-challenger, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/08/the-impractical-unsophisticated-very-necessary-long-shot-campaign-to-unseat-nancy-pelosi/, https://theintercept.com/2020/09/25/shahid-buttar-dsa-san-francisco-allegations/, https://inthesetimes.com/article/shahid-buttar-san-francisco-nancy-pelosi-2020, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: I am opposed to the creation of 2020 California 12th district election. After the election is concluded and the results came in, we can see it was much ado about nothing. The 'almost upset' didn't even come close to happening and Nancy Pelosi won 80%-20%. Additionally, Buttar wasn't even the best performer against Pelosi, she's had a closer margin in past elecitons. Finally, Buttar dropped completely out of the news cycle. Creating a page (or keeping this one) would be . The challenge was not credible, and hence the candidate was not notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)