Deletion of Disappearance of Susan Smalley and Stacie Madison

Comment: Remove the headers from this "article" and we have a genuine copy of a |news piece. Sure, some coverage exists, but as Freshacconci actually took the time to analyze, the ''context'' and ''duration'' of the coverage are significant. We find sources sporadically published, but they are mainly just "Missing...x years later" without any actual substance or |lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING)

Comment: I don't believe the sources available are showing a lasting impact on these particular disappearances. If you google "Susan Smalley and Stacie Madison" you get some news hits, per Icewhiz above, but they are local and sporadic, not sustained, in the vein of "whatever happened to...?" stories that will pop up. It's difficult to assess these sort of articles without sounding callous but I'm not seeing anything that makes these disappearances particularly notable and having a lasting impact (changed laws or attitudes or renewed focus, etc.). I say ''weak'' delete because although there are sources, they're not convincing per  or . Having said that, it's ''weak'' delete because a result of keep for this article would certainly not be detrimental to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:DEPTH)