Deletion of The Rivers and Beacon-Hills of Gondor

Comment: Per the policies  and , the worst case here would be merger into another page such as J. R. R. Tolkien bibliography or Gondor#Fictional_geography.  But  is indeed applicable: "''The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: per  #5, which says nothing about whether a work needs to be finished or published. It says that "the author's life and body of written work would be a common subject of academic study," which for Tolkien it obviously is. You can nitpick any individual source to death if you want to, but the deletion rationale is basically "there aren't any secondary sources discussing this work, except for..." and then that's followed by a list of all the secondary sources that discuss the work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)