Deletion of Virtual Digital Cable

Comment: Not sure that being first meets  here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Fails .  Socks need to be dealt with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I got 164 GHits, and a good proportion were WP or mirrors. Mentioned as "new" as of 2006-05-23 http://www.pocketpcmag.com/newsl_jkwg/webguide.asp?id=304 here. Not a fantastically authoratative source I know, and I'm aware that newness doesn't constitute a failure of , but it really doesn't seem notable. technologyguide.com did have a review of their service, but I'm not sure that makes it notable. I also might add that there have been a lot of new and anon users commenting on this AfD in the past, and (probable) sockpuppeting just screams "spam" to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: doesn't seem to meet the criteria at  but appears that notability is forth-coming.  More verifiable resources needed.  Mirror Whpq's comments, but voting on the other side
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I again think that what this company is doing in the cable industry does meet Wikipedia's Criteria for companies and corporations as outlined by . For your reference please see the below news stories which DO comply with Wikipedia's first criteria where; "The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I'm not sure that the usual criteria can easily be applied from  in that the claim to notability is that they are the first to do this.  On the other hand, the article itself reads like a press release (it must be rewritten if kept), and the claim for notability has not been sourced.  The only article provided actually shows the opposite, as the company is still planning to do it(crystal ball).  If the company's claim can be properly sourced and some additional notable media articles about the company are sourced, I'd change to a keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Forthcoming importance and a testimonial from someone's cousin? Please!. Neither satisfies 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)