Deletion of World of Greyhawk timeline

Comment: The topic doesn't have #Reliable sources and notability|reliable third-party sources and whatever sources are found about it aren't independent of the subject. It's an unnecessary |content fork that also fails the criteria of the |general notability guideline and it's more an unneeded |exposition of all possible details. In my opinion it also doesn't meet the criteria of |appropriate topics for lists either. For all these reasons and the reasons exposed in the nomination, I believe that it is within the criteria of #REASON|reasons for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CFORK||WP:GNG||WP:NOTCV||WP:SALAT||WP:DEL)

Comment: The timeline itself is merely a non-concise plot summary () of the various works presented in a non-encyclopedic format (using the fictional timeline rather than real chronology as a framework). The development section can go back to the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: An article dedicated to the chronology of a fictional universe (= plot summary) is a violation of  which forbids to write plot-only articles. Chronologies aren't acceptable on Wikipedia, even viewed as spinouts, period. As for the Development section, it doesn't have anything to do with the chronology (but more with how the creator came up with the story, which is already covered in a much better way in Greyhawk) and was obviously slapped on it only in an attempt to game 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:PLOT)

Comment: Since the AfD started, a major part of Greyhawk#Development of history and politics was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_of_Greyhawk_timeline&action=historysubmit&diff=406399475&oldid=404175300 copied to this article, not only lacking the correct attribution per the GFDL (copyvio), but also making it redundant with the main article. I've participated in lots of fictional timeline AfDs, and the vast majority of these articles (like this one) had the same problem and hence were deleted: their intention was to be a retelling of a fictional timeline, i.e. nothing but a plot summary in in violation of #PLOT. The section "The Greyhawk timeline" (the majority of the article) has to go either way, the rest (section "Development of the original timeline") is redundant to the main article, and so nothing but deletion makes sense to me. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)