Deletion of Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures

Comment: On the basis that it doesn't violate  — "Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. This means that there is no practical limit to the number of topics we can cover, or the total amount of content, other than verifiability and the other points presented on this page." All the information presented can be verified, either through the comic itself, or through the statements of the author. —modelincard
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Notability is not the same as verifiability. The two concepts are often confused as indicated http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability/Arguments#Arguments_against_deleting_articles_for_non-notability|here and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Uncle_G/On_notability#The_primary_notability_criterion|here. Reading between the lines, Francis Tyers sounds like he's arguing based upon the fame/lack of fame of the comic in question - but this is not a wikipedia criteria. Though it may be a technicality, a large amount of material exists in the site's forum, which though hosted locally was produced by multiple sources that are independent of the site itself.  and DMFA is obviously not . I see no reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NFT)