Deletion of K-Salaam

Comment: per the citations now included in the article.  Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: as per Bryson above (fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: No assertion of notability. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: pardon the pedantry, but how do you delete something until it is sourced? The ''Star Trib'' article is per definition ''beyond'' within . What this article needs is someone doing the work, not lazily stating that it should be deleted because noone bothered to apply the sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: while I can't help properly sourcing now, K-Salaam appears to be sufficiently notable per press in ''City Pages'' and ''Star Tribune'' (Minneapolis' biggest papers) possibly others passing , but with DJs frequently getting small notice writeups it might be a borderline case of "substantial coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Well, surely the bearing criterion for a "major label" can't be that a WP entry must be in place..?  I'm in an awkward position as a deletionist usually involved with AFDs of non-notable webcomics, but in that field on a level this sourced, I'd concede that the |attribution actually is in place and that a minimum level of notability is evident. I find it strange that this view isn't shared, but I gather that music is another turf altogether
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)