Deletion of Andrew Helm

Comment: The article needs work and I hope everyone understands that including people with possible conflict of interest. The language is unencyclopedic, however the list of |valid citations is substantial. Please improve it if you can. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:3PARTY)

Comment: that is actually the main point of contention.  My count on the list is that not a single one of the 32 references actually qualifies , Could you please identify which sources you think satisfies as a valid source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)

Comment: This article relies almost entirely on |primary sources, and the rest of the sources fail to meet |wikipedia's standard.  I searched for anything that might back up notability, but all I could find was more self published, and primary sources.  I did find a few interviews, but those were interviews done at conventions and were not published by reliable sources so those fail as well.  Fails , , .  I'm willing to change my opinion if someone brings reliable sources to the table, but as of yet I haven't seen any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: There is nothing to reword.  The question is very clear.  |reliable sources are needed to establish |notability.  A vague handwave saying there seems to be enough sources fails to address our notability guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: The sources in the article are beyond poor.  The sourcing offered up in this AFD is not any improvement, and I can find no coverage to establish |inclusion in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The sources are poor, and my searches didn't produce anything better. There's no substantial coverage of this subject by reliable sources. Credits alone, like liner notes, aren't enough to hew together a truly encyclopedic biography. In this case, fairly unreliable sources give more coverage, and the  and  represent the most coverage, including anything that could add to meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPSPS||WP:SPS||WP:ANYBIO)