Deletion of Averoigne

Comment: to Clark Ashton Smith. The tiny reception section is poor but perhaps a source or two could be salvaged. Other than that, not seeing what makes this fictional land notable. Nobody has demonstrated that there is non- coverage of it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:TRIVIAL)

Comment: as a not notable fictional concept without enough coverage in reliable secondary sources, as per . I see Toughpigs point about re-framing the article about the books themselves, but that's a different article with very little content worth preserving from this one. A '''rename and rewrite''' is an acceptable second choice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)