Deletion of Long Beach bicycle path (2nd nomination)

Comment: I am in agreement this is a textbook case of . Furthermore it appears this path has not received large amounts of widespread coverage in reliable and independent sources making it fall short of GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL)

Comment: Surprised at all the deletes here.  It has received very in-depth coverage easily passing . http://books.google.com/books?id=WLNt6rBgSz8C&pg=PA96&dq=%22Long+Beach+bicycle+path%22http://articles.latimes.com/1986-05-29/news/hl-7701_1_long-beach
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The basis for this nomination is almost entirely factually inaccurate.  Despite what the nom claims, |reliable sources stipulate there is in fact a "Long Beach Bike Path" and sources have written extensively on it.  Unfortunately it seems the participants in this AfD took the nom's stipulation at face value and voted accordingly.  As sources were provided late in this AfD, this might have to go to DRV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This bike path seems to have some type of local coverage, perhaps more than other bike paths in the state, but in this case  conflicts with , which alone should not be used to determine notability being that it states ''presumes'', not ''always''. Therefore, more sources outside of Long Beach are needed for me to vote a firm keep. Also, List of Los Angeles bike paths does not have an entry for this path, so merging is not out of the question here, which was also suggested in the first AfD in 2009
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL||WP:GNG)

Comment: or '''redirect''' to Long Beach, California; subject has received a http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/654088602.html?dids=654088602:654088602&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Jan+01%2C+1978&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=Etcetera....&pqatl=google passing mention in a non-primary |reliable source, however the subject of this AfD does not appear to have received |significant coverage and thus does not pass . That being said, the subject maybe a local interest as shown by the https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Long+Beach+bicycle+path%22&num=50 plethera of non-reliable source information available, so an alternative to outright deletion is following  and redirecting the article to an appropriate target
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:LOCAL)

Comment: per sources and article improvement via Oakshade.  is met. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)