Deletion of Carlos Becker Westphall (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails  clearly not enough to pass rof#C1 and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: Prof Westphall's bio aligns with  standards have been providing a significant contribution to Brazilian academia along more than 30 years of Full Professorship. His research has had a significant impact in Network Management, a discipline of Computer Sciences, as demonstrated by his list of publications, co-authorships, promotion of research networks, and number of citations. Moreover, he has provide an extensive contribution to formation of human resources and the next generation fo researchers and innovators in Brazil. Prof. Westphall has received numerous academic acclaims and awards at national and international levels, heading some of the most prestigious initiatives in Network Management research in the world, such as NOMS. His work has made a significant impact in the area of&nbsp;higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. He has head the Journal of Network and Management Systems, a notorious publication venue in the area. From a personal point, I know Prof Westphall for over 20 years and can assure his commitment to the formation of next generation of researchers in Brazil. He is not a sef-promoting personal and I see his interest at Wikepedia as setting a role model to promote leadership in research in Brazil. As an expat Brazilian researcher, I highlight the importance of equity and equivalence in promoting diversity of research approaches and consider the equivalence of research output between from leader researchers in developing and underrepresented regions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Mr. Westphall thinks is "under attack" because his page was nominated for deletion. He so concerned about his page that he even has sent an email to thousands of subscribers of Brazilian Computer Society's mailing list (https://listas.ufrgs.br/mailman/private/sbc-l/2017-September/06619 original, requires registration, and https://pastebin.com/Dzgs4wbL copy) asking for help to locate and identify the "aggressor" behind Special:Contributions/150.162.12.112|IP 150.162.12.112. As you can see, there is no aggression whatsoever from IP, and his only edit was an ordinary deletion request of an article about someone that does not meet , , or 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBIO||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Please be advised that !votes that are not policy based will likely be ignored by the closing admin. If you want to argue that this bio should be kept, then please show evidence that Westphall meets either , , ''or''  (one of them is enough). To whomever is organizing this infestation of anonymous IPs: please stop, your efforts are really harming your case and as all these IP !votes are likely to be ignored completely, the effort is wasted. Finally: please comment on the issues, not on people. Please see  if you're not familiar with how these debates are run. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBIO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AFD)

Comment: Fails : he has no coverage other than his papers (i.e. are non independent). Fails all items of ; his most cited work has 272 citations, not very remarkable in computer science, and he's not the first author in it. Also, the all-caps comments here against deletion are form a IP inside the professor's university, which could indicate a conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Unremarkable citation profile, no evidence of major awards, no sources indicating that something he wrote has become a standard text... I'm just not seeing a way to pass , let alone any other guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think the off-wiki canvassing may have slightly poisoned the well here. Google Scholar returns a high number of citations to Westphall's work, although perhaps not enough to pass #C1 in a high-citation field like computer science, and {{u|Fernandokoch2017}} mentions a few things that suggest a potential pass of other PROF criteria. But we would need some sources for that, which I can't find. I'd be interested to hear if {{u|David Eppstein}} had any insight. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Citations on GS in this very high cited field not enough yet to pass rof#C1. There is nothing else, oo soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: This article fails to pass  and doesn't show that he's done anything remarkable enough in Computer Science for coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think this article should be kept as per . Prof. Westphall is a known proponent of free access information (articles and books). He is also a well respected researcher on Cloud related issues with proven track record in both publishing and directing graduate degree students
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Mr. Westphall may be a nice guy who sends useful information to mailing lists, the article should be deleted because he fails at , , and . I'm sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBIO||WP:ACADEMIC)