Deletion of Beard-second

Comment: to List of humorous units of measurement. It is only "counterfactual" if we assert that this is a real unit. Asserting that it is a joke unit in a list of humorous units of measurement seems to be the proper way to deal with this. I don't see why "joke sources" can't be used as sources to document the fact that it is a joke. Perhaps if the "joke sources" were the only sources available it wouldn't even deserve a mention, but |assuming good faith, it apparently did make its way into a serious reference book: Nordling's ''Physics handbook for science and engineering''. I agree this isn't enough sourcing to support a full article, but I really don't see why it shouldn't be mentioned in the list of humorous units
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)