Deletion of AirTrain LaGuardia

Comment: It's been a while since I've read  closely and after careful review I don't see how  applies.  That "NOT" page is about "unverified speculation", not ''heavily verified'' plans or proposals.  There is nothing in  that bans articles about planned or proposed projects that are the subject of in-depth independent coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: as analogizing to .  This is in the Executive budget, which most likely will pass in 4-5 weeks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER)

Comment: Verified proposal that passes . Source examples: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/12/nyregion/tracing-the-route-of-a-proposed-airtrain-to-la-guardia-airport.html?_r=0, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/21/nyregion/cuomo-proposes-train-link-to-la-guardia-airport.html?_r=0, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/21/laguardia-airtrain-cuomo_n_6509430.html, http://observer.com/2015/01/andrew-cuomo-wants-to-build-a-train-to-laguardia-airport/, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/cuomo-announces-plan-building-airtrain-laguardia-airport-article-1.2085807
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)