Deletion of Dwight Watson (American football)

Comment: I also found the sources to be  as
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: For many of the reasons given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur S. Herman; college football coaches get no special exception at .  This one is far more cut and dried than Herman's though, scant local coverage for a player-coach
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: I will point out similar concerns I raised in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur S. Herman. The subject fails  by lacking significant coverage in secondary sources.  Significant "means that sources address the subject directly in detail", not that there are a large number of trivial sources. All the sources related to sports are  and limited to having his name in a list among many names. Being a college coach does not guarantee notability.  Per , "the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept."  It is only an indication that the subject is likely to be notable. "This guideline is used to help evaluate whether or not a sportsperson ... will meet the general notability guideline, and thus merit an article in Wikipedia. The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the criteria." No sources support that he established notability in the three games he coached in his entire career. His military service coverage is also routine, his name mentioned among a list of volunteers. There is inclusion in this article to his liuetenant, future Michigan governor Fred Green. However, notability is  and mention of Green appears unneeded in the article. The only marginally significant sources in this article are in telephony trade journals; however, his non-sports career as seen in these sources is un-of-the-mill and not notable either. Three sources used are Census information from Ancestry.com. Those documents are considered  sources, and cannot be used to establish notability as they are not  sources (see also Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_92#Ancestry.com). Though there are 14 total sources in this article, they do not serve to establish the subject's notability. There is also the danger of Wikipedia:Don't build the Frankenstein when synthesizing piecemeal information about a person based solely on the articles mentioning a person of the same name. It is not conclusive that the sportsman, the miliary person, and the telephony person are one in the same. Finally,  does not advise leniency simply because an article was recently created.  It's notability should be established while being developed on a user page, for example, before subjecting it to scrutiny in the article space
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NSPORTS||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:R||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SECONDARY||WP:ARTICLEAGE)

Comment: per Bagumba above, who summarizes my thoughts exactly.  does not appear to be met in this case (unless some more significant coverage can be found), and there is no policy that makes college coaches automatically notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)