Deletion of Deirdre M. Condit

Comment: might only be associate prof. but chair of a humanistic department at a major school usually is reserved for a quite respected scholar. Gender studies is a field where  has been noted on WP. Seems to clear the average professor test with room to spare
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: Above is again an argument on the basis that the subject is a "sought after pundit". This ''can'' satisfy GNG, but here it seems that it's mostly limited to local outlets and TV stations, for example the student-reported story on local affiliate channel 6 and all the other local sources that SusunW furnished &ndash; "local" is not the fodder for GNG, otherwise ''most'' academics would be notable. Also, most commentators seem to be unaware that some institutions have a rotation system for chairs and this tends to happen more in non-science departments. If this is true here (and I think it is a safe assumption), then this aspect adds no weight towards notability. Her citations are low and the SMS journal was founded in 2015, so editorship does not carry the weight of an established journal. I think the honest assessment here is that her trajectory is very promising, but that it is still , as SwisterTwister argued
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I see again that the thrust is to try to force her to meet some standard other than , which is not required by our guidelines that clearly state no further standard is required if GNG is met. She does not yet meet Prof, as her Chair does not appear to be endowed and the journal which she founded and edits does not yet have sufficient history. However, that being said, she doesn't have to meet Prof. There are RS independent of the subject which confirm that she has been sought repeatedly for comment over time on a variety of gender related subjects from health inequalities http://www.nbc12.com/story/30102984/federal-government-shutdown-looms-in-one-week to same sex marriage http://www.richmond.com/news/state-regional/virginia-politics/with-gay-marriage-on-hold-same-sex-couples-remain-hopeful/article_837bafe8-8eb9-56a2-8482-315b413c9c53.html to politics http://rvanews.com/news/women-still-underrepresented-in-virginia-politics/91955, http://wtvr.com/2013/10/11/political-analysts-grade-mcauliffe-cuccinelli
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: GNG)

Comment: Clear fail of rof#C1 with h-index of only 4 in a popular field, Over 15 is usually required.  What else is there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Having done some research, some of which I've added to the article, I think she might pass inclusion for Wiki for a few reasons: 1) She's the chair of her dept, 2) She's sought after in multiple VA news sources over time for commentary in her area of expertise, 3) While she's not "wildly cited" the 21 citations mentioned from Google Scholar ignores the amount of books that pop up in Google Books that cite her work. 4) I'm not an expert in her area of feminism, but it seems like a niche area of study, and so I wouldn't expect a billion citations. She seems to have a different view of Feminism and Fetal personhood than I've experienced from "mainstream" feminism. This might point to a lower cite rate. That said, she may indeed be a case of , as {{u|SwisterTwister}} points out. If this discussion ends in deletion, I think the article should be moved to draft space
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)