Deletion of Walkaway (political movement)

Comment: While I recognize the effort that went into finding new sources I still see an article that is entirely  without much indicator of |sustained coverage. The notability seems to be that it was picked up by "Russian bots," and if we start putting up an article for every idiotic thing "Russian bots" amplify all day we won't have a very high quality encyclopedia anymore
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: I appreciate the  effort that went into this, but I still don't believe it's notable outside the boundaries of its connection to its enactor - who I still think would be excluded per  and its connection to Russian Bots. As such, while it's definitely ''a notable example'' of a bot campaign, I don't think it's sufficiently notable to be due its own article. I have struck through my previous Delete !vote
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . There's |zero evidence this is notable; in fact, the only |reliable source in the article says otherwise. It's a made up meme without any basis in reality. Truth is still truth. We are still an encyclopedia, |not a soap box
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SOAP)

Comment: per all the improvements made since the article was nominated.  Please note the nomination is in error.  The nomination reads: that the subject is not a "notable thing".  This is wrong.  The subject meets  on account of the widespread coverage it has received.  For example, the issue was covered in July by ''Arutz Sheva'' of Israel, by ''CNN'', and by Australia's ''Morning Herald''.  In august, it was covered by Aftenposten, the Newspaper_of_record|newspaper of record of Norway.  The nomination ought to be withdrawn on these grounds alone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: As a viral phenomenon with no established impact or historical significance at this time, this instance of hashtag activism is not notable per #4 ("Routine kinds of news events"). —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT)