Deletion of Frederick Butterfield (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and . I question whether two blurbs, even in good newspapers, is enough to establish notability. There's a whole lot of "world's oldest man is notable" in this thread, but not much backing that up. We don't have a notability guideline that says that, and I eagerly await sourcing that shows this guy is actually notable. So far, we haven't seen it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:GNG)

Comment: The person asserting that |consensus has changed has the burden of proving that true
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: and/or '''Redirect''' to Oldest_people#Chronological_list_of_the_oldest_living_man_since_1973|this table where he is listed. Per  and the guidelines at the  Wikiproject he belongs on a list. The only information you lose by placing him on a list is that he worked and had his brain analysed. Which I don't believe is enough to justify a standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:WOP)