Deletion of Vipac

Comment: References fails  and/or . Most of the article is advertising - the list of "notable" projects reeks of promotion as does the list of awards most of which are unreferenced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: There is I think sufficient  to keep this article.  "only employs 100 people" - not a reason for deletion - notability is not conferred by the number of employees.  NOM has only ided 2 of 17 awards as vanities.   "probably not notable" - why - what  did NOM do.  There are easy to find standard google search results for http://rsaa.anu.edu.au/partnerships/vipac-engineers-scientists-pty-ltd partnerships with major academic institutions, eg the ANU, specialised http://www.applianceretailer.com.au/2016/12/vipac-opens-refrigeration-test-chambers/#.WX3wtoiGPIU facilities being opened by Federal Government Ministers, http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2007/s1961230.htm commissioned research by Four Corners, etc.  There is material for a more in-depth article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE)