Deletion of Third Sikh Holocaust 1984

Comment: Clear case of POV pushing with no |reliable source verifiability. Not one hit on gbooks or gscholar (unlikely given the scope of religious studies and ethnic studies at major universities). The only gnews link is a partisan source. Also part of this set of articles was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhai Sahib Satpal Singh Khalsa|this AfD that resulted in a delete, but one that had similar amount of reference padding to Harbhajan Singh Yogi and had overlapping editors. -SpacemanSpiff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The existence of other articles is not really relevant in a deletion discussion per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: with no previous good version to which to revert, this is hopelessly in violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Initially I considered whether an article rename would suffice, but reading through the article, it is clear that it is a irremediable piece of |soapboxing. Other articles created by the same user {{User|Guru Fatha Singh Khalsa
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: As per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How_to_discuss_an_AfD a point of view problem is an extremely poor reason to place an ADF tag on an article and a much better approach is to improve the article.  I have fixed a few of the more glaring style errors in the article and plan of fixing a few more, so since many of the  problems have been fixed, maybe the key issue is that this article is very verifiable as per guidline  with 160 citations and also very notable as per , seems like nobody has disputed these facts, and since this is not a vote this ADF should be rejected
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:N)