Deletion of Gale (loudspeaker)

Comment: per Bilorv and nominator - fails  quite clearly in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: seems like past attempts have failed due to lack of participation, but this is a blatant advert with no secondary sources. ''Stereophile'' looks like a blog; ''The Age'' is not in-depth; ''What Hi-Fi?'' is possibly usable but not hugely impressive. (Good  check by the nominator, it seems—can't find anything further, though it's tough to get the search terms.) The other claim to notability is the "awards" their website claims to run. I believe these types of consumer goods awards are given out to basically anybody who pays for them (they'll do 6 products per category and companies will enter their products in 6 categories for a few thousand pounds so it's very hard not to win). I would check that these particular awards fall in that category but it doesn't matter anyway as this wouldn't be enough for GNG given the context of at most one further good source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: utterly fails . The topic is the company, not the product
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)