Deletion of A Choice of Two

Comment: As this film meets . There are a number of sources out there, and since |notability is based on the sources available, whether or not the article was unsourced is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per meeting  through available sources.  I remind the nominator that a |topic's notability is dependent upon sources being available and NOT upon their ever being used. THAT's a matter for |regular editing, and it does not improve the project to delete an |arguably notable topic simply because it might start out |looking poor. We fix. , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NEXIST||WP:IMPROVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:UGLY||WP:WIP||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: As noted above, even if an article is unsourced as written, GNG is still passed if sufficient |reliable source coverage ''exists'' to repair it with. In addition to the sources noted above, I've found a review in ''The Globe and Mail'' from when it later aired on CBC Television in 1982 — and that's a gold-standard source, of the type that counts for as much by itself as five or six regional newspapers combined
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)