Deletion of Robert Trump (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets . Also,  and  don't apply here.  specifically says that people known solely for having a relationship with someone famous ''can'' be notable if they pass . So, determining if he has enough significant coverage in reliable sources is what matters - period - not a Wikipedia essay about how to have a productive AfD discussion. {{pb}}And  is about ''one'' event - saying the Mary Trump book court case is "one event" would ignore that he got significant coverage during many events - a questionable government contract,https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/company-with-ties-to-trumps-brother-robert-awarded-33-million-government-contract/2019/10/26/f67164d2-f688-11e9-829d-87b12c2f85dd_story.html during Donald's presidency in general (in which he receives the most significant coverage)https://web.archive.org/web/20170520102534/https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/money-and-power/news/a8479/robert-trump/https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-sibling-bios-judge-sister-alcoholic-brother-retirees-2018-10https://www.google.com/books/edition/Trump/ZQ_9CwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Robert+Trump%22&pg=PT285&printsec=frontcover, work on the Taj Majal casino,https://www.newspapers.com/clip/57470131/at-the-top-of-the-taj/ his death (which give detailed biographies, not just the date and who he was),https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/15/us/politics/robert-s-trump-dead.html and in general.https://www.newspapers.com/clip/57470592/a-trump-without-glitz/ I can likely find more on newspaper websites if this is somehow not enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and  as well as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per  and Tone. What sources there are would not exist if not for his brother being the US President, and even the obits discuss him in relation to his family. The fact he filed a lawsuit does not establish notability for him personally, as it all had to do with the Trump family. I don't believe the sources establish him as notable on his own. The information on Family of Donald Trump seems sufficient
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: He wasn't notable enough to have an article before he died, coverage of his death doesn't override  or 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per , nearly ever single source that I looked at is about Donald Trump and then mentions his brother as an after thought
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: As usual, people are misinterpreting . Robert Trump did not need to have done anything of note in his own right. The real question is if there is in-depth specific and detailed coverage of him by reliable sources. There is plenty of that. There are obituaries in many newspapers, like this one in NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/15/us/politics/robert-s-trump-dead.html, which specifically covers the life of Robert Trump, as separate from Donald. In addition, there was Robert Trump's lawusuit against the publication of Mary Trump's book that received a lot of coverage in June-July. That is also new compared to 2017. Plenty enough here to meet the requirements of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: meets  and . Plenty of media coverage about him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:NOTINHERITED is neither a policy nor a guidelines, but for those who want to cite it as reason to delete, do please note that it states: {{tq|The fact of having a famous relative is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article. Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass .}} There is evidently enough coverage around the world of this person to pass  with ease
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As usual  is misinterpreted and misapplied. The essay concerns "arguments to avoid during AfD discussions". Almost no one is making the argument to keep simply because he is Donald Trump's brother.  If my vote said "Keep because he is the President's brother", then yes, that is what  is referring to. But no one is doing that, and rarely do. The essay is based on , which requires verifiable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERETED||WP:NOTINHERETED||WP:NRVE)

Comment: tons of coverage in newspapers and books over an extended period. See 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)