Deletion of Pamela Pendley Biggers

Comment: in this case, there does not seem to be sufficient coverage to justify keeping the article;  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:BLP1E and  apply in spades.  Furthermore defense is based around 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: I am unsure if we deserve an article for every disappeared person: this case seems to fit  and  pretty well. If there is substantial coverage, I'd keep it, but it seems there is not much more than a single CNN news report and a single WJHG one. I am willing to change my !vote if more coverage comes out
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: PLEASE READ" unsigned comment makes good point - what is the standard for missing persons cases, because they are very often s, yet have articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)