Deletion of List of fatal dog attacks in the United Kingdom

Comment: per NOTNEWS. Further, these lists are and will always be susceptible to  by virtue of the availability of sources, so are really just a collection of recent such events
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Simply because I believe any concerns about the article (verifiability, appropriate content, any BLP violations) can be resolved by normal editing, and I don't think  can apply as the notability is on ''the list itself'', which contains events over hundreds of years. Furthermore, the https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1991/may/23/dangerous-dogs Hansard source cited in the article can be used to expand the lead and explain why the level of dog attacks led to changes in the law. Per the suggestion given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fatal dog attacks in the United States, I would suggest a |Request for comment is started to get a consensus on the appropriateness of these list articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RFC)

Comment: per . This is essentially just a collection of news reports as well as two lists of stats that appear to contradict each other
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)