Deletion of Argo Tea (2 nomination)

Comment: I've added a list of independent references and four more external links to independent websites. Two of the references are from ABC news, one is from the University of Chicago paper, about Argo Tea making a large donation of white tea leaves to cancer research at the U of C Hospital. Clearly satisfies  and . More references to come
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CORP)

Comment: Still believe this is a notable young company.  It is worth keeping.  I still believe the  alternate test of expandability (Will the article ever be more than a stub? Could the perfect article be written on this subject?) is quite relevant here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom and per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL)

Comment: Fails  - No hits for Argo Tea on Google News, only 18,500 hits on Google proper of which the majority appear to be directory sites, Yellow Pages, that type of thing. '''Kind Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: It's not clear where any of this is sourced from, but if it's all the company's website, that'd meet #Self-published_and_dubious_sources_in_articles_about_the_author.28s.29, but without some sources presented in the article, it does fail CORP. There are sources at the end of the first AFD that wouldn't be hard to incorporate and use in this article if
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)