Deletion of Melanie Specht (2nd nomination)

Comment: per .  All I'm seeing are bit part roles, with little speaking (if any).  Seems like a case of . The NYT page seems like nothing more than IMDb and provides no coverage.  While she has appeared in notable shows and notable films, NACTOR explicitly requires multiple significant roles.  Disclaimer: I was told about this AfD by email presumably based on my involvement in some of Lady Lotus's other nominated AfDs.  The message was neutral, (though not as transparent as I would like) and did not pressure me nor imply that I should vote one way or another. (Edit : As I see canvassing has already been brought up here, I should clarify that it was not sent by Lady Lotus.) &#8213;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per nom (even a broken clock tells the correct time twice a day) and {{U|Rhododendrites}}.  In addition, I wish to note how difficult it can be to decide deletion when (a) there are lots of blogs and model shots of a B film actor, and when (b) we |sometimes keep actors whose major role was something minor along the lines of "Rollover Mom" or "Waitress at the diner in ''Easy Rider''".  Any attractive actor who's had any roles on TV or film will inevitably get ''some'' attention in blogs or film reviews.  But they often fail |our basic rule of notability.  In this case, I can't see how she'd pass that nor the more specific |acting rule.  I won't scream if this is kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Unremarkable woman who does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: fails /. There are a couple sources, but they don't look to be terribly good publications/website (smelling of promotional/paid content, though I'm not sure). I was also contacted by email to !vote, presumably because I participated in the other "note to the closing admin" AfDs. If you have a concern with {{u|Lady Lotus}}'s competence as nominator, that's something to bring up at e.g.  rather than to include as part of the reason to keep here. As far as I'm concerned, everybody's allowed some mistakes (or, more specifically, judgment that sometimes diverges from consensus). &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BIO||WP:ANI)