Deletion of Raji Arasu

Comment: the sources cited do not meet . However, in addition, there is much that is not encyclopaedic in the page. It states "Arasu is noted for her work towards educating, mentoring and empowering women to be successful in the male-dominated computer and technology industry." A big claim requires a big source but this claim is unsourced. Which women has she mentored to success in these industries?  She has worked for eBay but eBay is cited as a source for another big claim "eBay described her as a "role model for women", given her work as a technology executive,". This eBay source is used five times and is clearly a puff piece based on an interview she gave to The Daily Muse which as the Wikipedia article on The Muse (website) states: "creates in-depth profiles of companies seeking top talent, showcasing their brand" and as is as far away from a RS you can get. And so on, I could parse most of the article similarly. Essentially this is a promotional piece for a worthy, successful person but not one who meets our notability standards. Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0|2A02:C7F:4481:8300:90DC:E235:5074:54B0
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: This looks pretty borderline to me. There are many non-independent sources in the article, which don't help in showing notability. The independent ones seem to be ''The Daily Muse'' and ''Forbes''. I can't see the ''Boston Globe'' source, so I don't know how much it has about her. ''Computerworld'' includes her in some articles where IT leaders give advice and opinions - March 2009 and August 2016, and in 2016 included her in 100 Premier Technology Leaders. (I'm not including links as I access them through the National Library of Australia|NLA.)  ''Business Insider'' in 2017 had her as #28 on a list of "43 most powerful female engineers of 2017" https://www.businessinsider.com/most-powerful-female-engineers-of-2017-2017-2?r=AU&IR=T, and in 2014 had her as one of "5 Successful Women In Technology From India" https://www.businessinsider.in/5-successful-women-in-technology-from-india/articleshow/44991200.cms. So that coverage extends from 2009-2017. It's not substantial, but neither is it trivial, and I think it just meets  "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)