Deletion of Loran de Munck

Comment: Plenty of coverage in the press. Clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Don't see any form of WP:BEFORE.  "nor do they meet " would mean that all European Championships gymnasts don't meet GNG!? De Munck has >500 hits in Google News articles https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Loran+de+Munck%22&rlz=1C1GCEA_enNL905NL905&sxsrf=ALeKk00VKFUDF1dbEKSyiLS0zKIKmEpYkw:1620200581112&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiqhujAhbLwAhWRyaQKHc3IC0cQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1536&bih=754 see here. Of the European Championships is coverage about him in reliable secondary sources, 2 examples: https://www.noordhollandsdagblad.nl/cnt/dmf20210323_32078696 1, https://www.leidschdagblad.nl/cnt/dmf20190411_16740162 2. Also see for instance an inverview at https://www.turnsupporter.nl/qa-loran-de-munck/ here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It seems the commenters arguing that there is plenty of coverage are unable to distinguish between passing mentions and sigcov; also, between  and something lesser. I've tried my best searching for something that would establish  (given that the athletic achievements clearly don't meet ), but couldn't find anything that comes even close: the Noordhollands Dagblad piece is probably the best, but it is an interview, and in any case on its own nowhere near enough. The chap may well be a future star, but for now this is just a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:TOOSOON)