Deletion of Abraham Mutholath

Comment: per , Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Clergy, and . He is at the level of vicar general, which is roughly equivalent to a monsignor or canon. Those titles or ranks do not automatically give rise to notability. Priests are ''not'' automatically notable. I agree with the consensus that we not keep such articles. However, he is young enough where he could still be appointed a bishop or cardinal by the Pope. For the record, arguing over notability after 20 years that Wikipedia has been in existence is |not a good faith argument. Also for the record, I am a member of the wider Catholic church, and have created several articles about bishops; I moved the Pope Francis article to its current name immediately after he was elected
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON||WP:AGF)

Comment: Definitely |promotional biography about a subject that doesn't meet notability guidelines. It's too detailed with no sufficient sources. Also i have noticed a number of IPs commenting keep... definitely a promo piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)