Deletion of Kim Bong-han (2nd nomination)

Comment: though I suspect the best that will happen with this is that we get a no-consensus keep again rather than a clear keep), for the same reason I gave the last time: no mainstream and scientifically-reliable sources to give a  take on the subject's fringe research. As the nominator notes, nothing has improved about the article, so there's no reason for me to have changed my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: AfD's need to be based on reasons set in the deletion policy. ( → -REASON) From your nomination, it isn't clear what the "unresolvable" deletion-specific problem: is it notability? That's what we usually talk about when we talk about AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:DEL)