Deletion of Jonathan Levine (commentator)

Comment: Given that the subject has gotten opinion pieces in prominent newspapers and magazines, I expected to find news ''about'' the subject in . But, no. Fails  in the end
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: Notwithstanding nom's somewhat intemperate wording this is a clear case of . Subject fails , , , ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ARTSPAM||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BASIC||WP:BLP||WP:RS)

Comment: The subject does not meet  or . The lead does not clearly state why he would be notable nor do the sources back up any particular direction. It's a poorly written article and it is not properly sourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: This discussion is starting to reek of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCKS)