Deletion of Bo Rocha

Comment: I'm sorry but this is a far cry from passing GNG. Firstly all 3 sources are really brief - like the only information  we get is that she is a singer who released this album. Out of the 5 sources in the article I found 2 are repeat links, so essentially we have 3 sources. Of of these 3, http://www.clashmusic.com/news/listen-bo-rocha-live-fast-or-die this is essentially rehashing http://www.thefader.com/2015/02/19/bo-rocha-tangerine-flake Fader. The other coverage is in http://noisey.vice.com/en_uk/blog/premiere-bo-rocha-angel-eyes Vice. Bot the Fader and Vice coverage hardly talk about the person - in fact they are the kind of brief press releases (4-5 sentences long) which are sent out to various music websites. Searching more, I see similar content on other "online music sites". Its pretty clear these are press releases sent out en masse. The subject btw wouldn't pass  by any chance. I also feel this is  considering that the subject only launched the first work in November 2015. Delete as fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: All of the coverage is the standard music blog/website stuff that involves sharing streams of new songs. It's essentially placement secured by PR agencies that send press releases to secure almost copy-and-paste style coverage. Bo Rocha is represented, I believe, by Inside Slash Out, who have some quite prominent clients that make it in such website's best interests to plug their newer artists. But it's irrelevant coverage and a case of  at best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Coverage in three music magazines or their associate websites cited in article. These appear to be reliable sources. Although coverage is brief, it is not trivial and so meets . Don't overthink things people, just follow the notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: It's a case of  for the subject to have it's own article here and it fails . There should be some Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance|claim of significance of the subject otherwise it should be speedly deleted under the criteria of A7
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:MUSICBIO)