Deletion of Donna M. Marbach (2nd nomination)

Comment: A lot of small accomplishments that add up to enough to keep per  on authors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As an author, appears to have had a few works published, but there doesn't appear to be any critical commentary about her works, thus failing . More importantly, there's nothing else out there about her, so she doesn't meet . The rest looks more like a resume
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG)

Comment: This article is inside  and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Given the dearth of other sources directly about her, I concluded that her notability hinges entirely on 's condition that "the person has created, or played a major role in '''co-creating,''' a significant or well-known work, or '''collective''' body of work, that has been the subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."  She's edited or co-edited a number of books, after all.  Maybe something there?  Alas, none of those books show up at google book search as having been reviewed "in any of the usual places".  Except for one edit to Greyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grey&diff=prev&oldid=147714425, the article's originator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Ret.Prof's argument-from-accumulation has the further demerit that there's nothing in the guideline cited in support of it () that ''says'' that a lot of small accomplishments add up to general notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)