Deletion of Betsy Devine (Second nomination)

Comment: Could use some better references to meet 2008 standards, but seems to pass . Some appropriate googling shows that she is in fact "widely cited", at least enough for inclusion, and I found two reviews for one of her co-authored books to meet . The nom does smell of bad faith
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BK)

Comment: Many of the sources I find list her in the course of talking about her notable physicist husband Frank Wilczek, in which case she could be mentioned in his article. The sources which are her books and her blogs are not that convincing as to . More reviews and other substantial coverage in reliable and independent sources are needed as refs in the article. To avoid conflict of interest, the subject of an article should let others do the editing. She can list the refs on the article talk page. A starting point is a Google News search http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22betsy+devine%22&scoring=r. The trick is getting past the paywall to see which have more than passing references to her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as the rationale from AfD #1 seems to still hold. (Which basically is that she does, in fact, pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)