Deletion of IceRocket

Comment: The Mark Cuban connection gives a tenative claim to notability per  criteria #3. Sources found: http://www.news.com/Mark-Cuban-to-relaunch-IceRocket/2100-1032_3-5797070.html CNet story from 2005 & http://www.forbes.com/home/personaltech/2004/11/10/cz_eb_1111searchslide_4.html?thisSpeed=25000 Forbes. Google News has additional non-trivial coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: It's had independent articles written about it (http://www.news.com/Mark-Cuban-to-relaunch-IceRocket/2100-1032_3-5797070.html these, http://www.searchenginejournal.com/interview-with-icerocket-blog-search-ceo-blake-rhodes/1994/ two are mentioned on the article talk page, and there's http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=IceRocket&hl=en&ned=us more where that came from), which means it satisfies the criteria of .  It also seems that these articles are fairly substantial works rather than flash-in-the-pan news coverage, which means that it passes the #TEMP|temporary notability test.  I doubt it's ever going to be a great article, but I don't think it needs to be deleted, either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:N)