Deletion of Doctor Who tie-in websites

Comment: to series pages and/or episode pages.  These don't rise to the level of being an episode-equivalent, and the article itself doesn't suggest that the page meets the  (though I'll admit that I'm not sure how to search for references to these).  That said, these pages ''are'' part of the stories told in the various episodes and should be documented in the respective pages if they aren't already - possibly the general website campaign should be documented on the series pages as well. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Thanks for pointing that out -- indeed I didn't see it before nominating. It would be useful to make some tweaks to link the two AfDs upon this one's closure, but it shouldn't have much bearing on the discussion here. As an AfD from 2005, it was operating under very different and/or undeveloped deletion processes, and in fact stands as a pretty good example of that contrast (nearly all of the comments fall under ). --&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AADD)