Deletion of Hair in food

Comment: WP:WAX. I don't think that my not understanding the hate for this article is deserving of sarcasm. It simply seems like a legitimate topic. There's food contamination but a) that's focused mainly on packaged food and b) the topic before us is covered in health terms, in mitigation, and in legislation terms. Sue me, |I found it interesting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: do we need an article for candle on computer? Eyeglasses on bookshelf? Is this the start point for List of substances that are (within Western Culture) not supposed to be in food, in food? Does that mean we'll have articles for dirt in food? glass in food? Dirty glass in food? Or is "hair" the key point of this article? Should there be hair on floor, hair in shower drain, hair on back-order? This whole "debate" reeks of , and I imagine it's a call for |sensible action. Leaving this article in will lead us down a slippery slope, and at the bottom of that slippery slope is hair in food in popular culture (I'll leave it to another editor to work on a Cheddar cheese|popular culture-focused pun
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:IAR)

Comment: Wow, did you even notice that the nominator wanted to ''keep'' this article?  indeed. Oh, sweet irony
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PERNOM)