Deletion of Company of Heroes 3

Comment: The assertions that the cited sources are "non reliable website", "self published/paid", and "significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject" are incorrect at best, disingenuous at worst. If the nominator's concern is that the article's creation into mainspace is , an argument should have been made to send it to draftspace. However, the sources cited are more then adequate to justify the article's existence. As other editors have pointed out, if it is canceled and hypothetically no extensive sourcing emerges to cover why it is canceled, a merge discussion into the series article would be appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)