Deletion of Wynne LeGrow

Comment: All the sources I see are exactly the sort of run-of-the-mill coverage generated by any halfway competent political campaign. I see no significant coverage of this person before or after the campaign. Accordingly, the article about the campaign is the best place to discuss this person, according to longstanding consensus as reflected in  
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Muboshgu is incorrect, I am seeing alot of good references from the NY Times, to local Virginia papers to a TV station or two, not ''just'' the campaign website.  If the article didn't have the sources, I would say it failed GNG, but since it has 17 sources that fall under , I think it passes GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)