Deletion of SIBIS

Comment: There is a potentially notable SIBIS; it's apparently a device that "special" children are made to wear to keep them from banging their heads on the wall.  But this article is about |yet another EU research project, this one dating from 2003, that apparently never amounted to much, with an extremely vague programme: ''Its aim was to develop "innovative information society indicators to take account of the rapidly changing nature of modern societies and to enable the benchmarking of progress in EU Member States" in an Information Society.''  If I read more text like that, I'm going to need a SIBIS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: to Information society and then redirect to Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System. No need for disambig since there have been no links to this in the three years of its existence. I would call this a Wikipedia:Permastub since it only existed for two years, and thus unlikely to ever get more notable. Any conclusions about the "rapidly changing nature of modern societies" is going to be stale by now, but might have been worth mentioning in a more historical context. The policy is |general notability, and yes, these discussions tend to be based on opinion and essays are good to summarize those.  The other guideline is that wikipedia is not a glossary: every acronym that was ever invented for a couple years does not get its own article. Thousands come and go each bubble. Encyclopic entries are supposed to be fully developed topics. Nothing to do about being "sexy" or not, just what an encyclopedic topic really is
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)