Deletion of Perceptions of religious imagery in natural phenomena

Comment: and then shoot me, please.  "Less than serious newspaper" coverage.  We look at verifiability, not seriousness.  "This type of whacky article probably reduces the credibility of Wikipedia."  If it's verifiable and reliably sourced, your assertion fails.  "What if someone notices the face of Einstein on a piece of fruit?  Will there be an article on that in Wikipedia?"  If there's significant discussion of such a phenomena in the media, it just might be included in this article.  "If Wikipedia is to be taken seriously then we must delete this article..."  Sorry, I missed that particular criteria for deletion.  Funny enough, I did find |this, and I think that might be what you're asking for here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: although some content does not cite its sources, and may be |original research, the article meets the |notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: and probably consider renaming Acheropite.  Weird and wacky it may be, but Acheropites are a recognised and fairly commonly occuring class of phenomena, and have been for centuries.  The word comes from the Greek for "not by human hand" and the most famous is probably the Turin Shroud (although I guess that depends on your view about its true origins). The Nun Bun (Mother Teresa in a small snack food item) made headlines all around the world.  See the http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acheropita Italian Wikipedia's treatment of the term - it's a stub, but it does explain itself - and a few easily accessed examples:  http://www.nbc11.com/news/13528346/detail.html, http://www.mcn.org/1/Miracles/allaharchive.htm, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2999172.stm to demonstrate its reporting in the media.  Whether we change the title or not (and I'll suggest it on the talk page), this subject meets  and  as a description of a social phenomenon, whatever your views on those who ascribe supernatural origins to the items.  It just needs to be written descriptively from a NPOV.  I'll have a go
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)