Deletion of Assyrian Jews

Comment: as  and .  I first commented on this when it was in draft.  The specific words I objected to were changed, with the edit comment, {{tq|Please let me know if any other words in this article lack a neutral tone}}.  NPOV is not about vocabulary, it's about intent.  The goal of this was obviously to  promote a particular viewpoint.  The original edit comment, {{tq|I recently stumbled upon this ancient group of people while doing research on the ancient people of antiquity. To my surprise, they still exist to this day, and I have communicated with many of them on Facebook. In honor of them, I spent a lot of time putting together this short excerpt and hope that others can help me expand on this article of significant cultural importance}} makes that clear., as does https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Assyrian_Jews&diff=prev&oldid=916906203&diffmode=source this talk page comment.The sourcing is horrible.  We've got :File:Assyrian National Anthem in Hebrew & Aramaic.jpg, which is stated as "Own work".  What does that mean?  Did 0limits create it from scratch?  Is this some piece of printed material they photographed, and if so, where was it published and who wrote it?  The description field itself is a political statement.  Similar comments can be made about the video.  And looking through the more conventional sources, none strike me as solid   sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: per . They might exist, but this is a huge mess, starting with |the video and most of it |synthesis or |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:SOAP||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)