Deletion of Wendy Lou

Comment: per #3. Lou is a Fellow of the American Statistical Association
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: She definitely meets  and therefore is a WP BLP; we can debate the degree of notability, but her qualification is not in doubt (which I think is the consensus view of this AfD).  No problem with removing specific details from a BLP if it causes distress (as we did on Dhammika Dharmapala), but we would be creating a dangerous precedent (e.g. a WP:WENDYLOU), if a publically known and photographed figure (she is a Prof in a major university http://www.dlsph.utoronto.ca/faculty-profile/lou-wendy/ http://ondri.ca/people/wendy-lou/ https://childstudy.ca/people-partners/researchers/lou-w/ http://www.wlou.biostatistics.utoronto.ca/ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wendy_Lou http://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/scv2008/cv/35.pdf https://ssc.ca/en/ssc-elections-2010-list-candidates http://sam.cufe.edu.cn/info/1087/1550.htm; even her salary is public knowledge http://www.thesunshinelist.com/ca/salary-disclosure/wen-yi-wendy-lou/university-of-toronto), could have a bland BLP of public information deleted because she does not like it, or it causes her distress?  She has her own LinkedIn page? https://www.linkedin.com/in/wendy-lou-33a5161b  How do we progress after such a point?  We have many "controversial" BLPs on WP whose subjects would also prefer it deleted if given the option - how would we respond to their future requests post WP:WENDYLOU
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Subject seems notable enough to me given the info in the article. But if she has requested her article deleted,  is relevant though not conclusive
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: Prof. Lou definitely passes |the academic notability guideline, so ordinarily, there wouldn't be an issue at all. Furthermore, looking over the page content, I'm having a hard time finding anything objectionable; with the possible exception of her birth year, all of the information reads like a department profile or a conference speaker's bio blurb. Perhaps, as suggested just above, knowing more specific concerns would be helpful (if the nominator is at liberty to disclose them). For example, I would support protecting the page if Prof. Lou is concerned that it will be vandalized. Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I've removed the birth year, which to my thinking could possibly cause distress or perceived ageism to a female professional as it is not something "widely published by reliable sources" and no longer appears in the source that was referenced anyway, per . I'm frankly torn - my personal desire would be to have her request fulfilled, as I am completely sympathetic to having privacy, yet a neutral article about someone recognized for "remarkable collaborations in the biomedical and healthcare sciences" in an esteemed position, particularly for women, is arguably something inspirational and of value to select Wikipedia readers. Perhaps she could give a statement privately to an admin as to her reasoning
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:DOB)