Deletion of Jeffrey Allen Sinclair

Comment: Obviously, as a general officer per . I have never seen a general officer from any country deleted at AfD and I fail to see why we should make an exception for this man because he's been involved in a scandal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: as a flag officer - and actually one who has gotten a fair amount of coverage, but keep in any case. To those who claim that  doesn't override  - yes, actually in a sense it does. So do  and  and  and  and many other guidelines where consensus has developed that certain subjects are "presumed notable" - that is, it is assumed that significant reliable source coverage could be found on those subjects, even if it isn't in the article at the moment. These conventions are widely respected at Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: WP:SOLDIER does not trump . My view would be that if he commanded an arms corps battalion on operations and made brigadier general, then there should be enough sources independent of the subject to meet GNG. It isn't clear to me that is so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)