Deletion of Prince George of Cambridge

Comment: Obviously passes , and the nomination appears to be based on the nominator's opinion of who ''should'' be notable than on any part of Wikipedia editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this is an excellent example of why  is utter bollocks and shouldn't be quoted as  when it's 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:POLICY||WP:NOTPOLICY)

Comment: the subject has received massive coverage, and far passes the |notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  given the obvious reasons stated by others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per above. No valid reason for nomination given and the subject passes  by a long way, as do the rest of his family. The nomination appears to be based upon , using the phrases "non-notable family" and "become a Republic" makes this nomination appear to be based upon the politics of the nominator, rather than the content or notability of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)