Deletion of Distributed Art Publishers

Comment: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Distributed+Art+Publishers%22 Google news search finds news stories about this company in ''Afterimage'' (July 2005, re a partnership with the Aperture Foundation), ''Publishers Weekly'' (January 2007, re a new web site; February 2007, re some internal personnel changes), not to mention plenty of coverage for their individual publications. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=DAP+Distributed-Art A variation of the search finds ''Art Business News'' (September 2002 re their relationship to MoMA), ''Publishers Weekly'' (July 2004 and again in August 2005, both re their warehousing facilities), http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/04/style/tmagazine/t_h_2282_samurai_.html?_r=1&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/Organizations/P/Philadelphia%20Museum%20of%20Art&oref=slogin a recommendation in the New York Times to shop for art books through their catalog, some of the same stories again, and many minor mentions and quotes in other stories. Seems to satisfy the primary criterion of  to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)