Deletion of Lee Behnken

Comment: per nom unless, prior to end of discussion, someone cites good published sources, meeting the |reliable source guidelines, for this being an important artist who meets  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Fails , nn
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: As this is a fairly new editor, I'd like to give them a chance (in the spirit of |Assume good faith and |Don't bite the newbies) - it seems to me that this artist could well be notable. I have left a note on the user's talk page suggesting possible ways to improve the article. If this *cannot* be done, then I guess I will have to go with delete. Note that charting is not the only way to achieve independent notability (see ) I'll withhold my vote for now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BITE||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Fails  - only claim to notability is "success on contemporary Christian radio charts", and even this claim is not backed up by any |reliable sources.  Even if kept, the article needs to have the hagiography (and I use the word advisedly) toned down a lot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:RS)

Comment: Don't get me wrong, I'm not harping about their careers - but thinking more about it, it's kind of a paradox.  That aside, I'm looking closer at it, and you're right: it does meet  (and maybe just so), but its references are a bit hidden.  That leaves the issue of |POV: it reads more like something for a church or for Harvest Crusade than an encyclopedia article, and many people who read this article are going to balk when they see that it's got a Christian evangelistic bent in its tone.  As such, I'm changing my vote to '''Keep''', but it needs cleanup due to the point of view problem.  (Yes, I know, sanitizing it and all, but...well, know your audience
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:POV)

Comment: no indication that subject passes , only sources cited are primary or trivial. If it's not a speedy candidate as spam, it's sure close
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)