Deletion of Glamour Puss Studios Tap Dancing Academy

Comment: Generally, multiple works from the same publication are considered a single source when it comes to judging notability (see , bullet point 3), so the sources from The Age aren't enough on their own. Even if they were to be taken separately, https://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/crowd-taps-its-way-into-street-fun/news-story/fe773a56d0c04b3acec1a433490bc458 and https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/2018-moomba-parade-melbourne-20180312-h0xdah.html cannot be considered in-depth sources. https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/time-to-put-on-your-happy-feet-20100523-w3zi.html is basically a local-flavor puff piece that's about 70% interview. https://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/dance/turning-on-the-tap-for-a-big-splash-20110522-1eysn.html is more local flavor. Ironically, https://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/art-and-design/win-or-lou-lous-its-putting-on-the-writs-20060101-ge1ibi.html this one covering a lawsuit against the company is the most in-depth of the lot. In any case, without any significant, in-depth, independent coverage outside its area (or even outside one publication!) it badly flunks . There for sure isn't enough here for an  pass. &spades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUD||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Any case for  is a contrived/technical case at best.  Sources are very scant and there is no proper significant independent .  This is clearly not a significantly notable institution even in Australia.  There is no long-term future for this article in WP, why try to construct a case for it to defer the inevitable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)