Deletion of Stephen Borthwick (schoolmaster)

Comment: an accomplished education administrator, but does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Although sources are reliable notability is not attained under rof
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: The subject complies with , as all the information in it can be referenced from reliable sources. Borthwick died a few days ago, and the national press has not yet printed the obituaries which will provide even more substantial coverage. It may be helpful to put this AfD on hold until then. {{U|ClemRutter}}, I do not see your point about links. As it happens, Lambeth Academy has an article, not a very good one. You say Epsom College Malaysia needs an article, but that supposes it is notable, and I believe there is no longer a presumption that all secondary schools are. But where does any of that go? Membership of the Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference does not "go with the job in most private schools", but that also has nothing to do with notability. {{U|Oaktree b}}, "un-of-the-mill" is an essay, not policy, and the GNG has nothing to do with importance, it is simply about whether there is enough coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:R)