Deletion of Starhaven (Press)

Comment: Even if the books it publishes are notable by virtue of reliable-source coverage, |notability is not inherited, therefore the notability of the books doesn't say anything about the notability of the company, in the sense of how Wikipedia defines notability. If coverage from multiple independent reliable sources (not other Wikipedia articles, blogs, press releases, business directory listings, etc.) can be found, then the article could be kept, but I am not seeing such coverage as required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:CORP)

Comment: No apparent notability, does not meet . The COI editor who created the article apparently has no clue what constitutes a |reliable reference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS)