Deletion of Wasilla Bible Church (2nd nomination)

Comment: I agree that notability is not inherited, but having been preserved during  attacks on Sarah Palin, I see no reason to delete now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Unfortunately, these articles are far from the only Sarah Palin-related coatracks out there.  I grew tired of trying to point this out to the lemming-like masses who create messes like this in response to their daily talking points memo, or to obsessive coverage given by CNN/Fox News/etc., or perhaps any other equally-as-banal reason.  Usually, you'll hear some excuse like , offering the appearance that as far as they're concerned, it's someone else's job to actually clean it up and/or do the real work, because they've already moved on to the next lost cause.  Methinks numerous of these editors need to be reminded a little more often of ,  or possibly other pertinent pages.  Without actually reading any of the sources offered by Carrite, just clicking on the links and browsing the articles, what do I see?  Sarah Palin's name and/or photo plastered front and center.  The church only appears prominently in these stories in the context of Sarah Palin's association with the church.  This validates the point raised by Beeblebrox in the first place.  Meanwhile, it's almost as if there is a concerted effort being maintained on Wikipedia to deny the notability of Anchorage Baptist Temple.  This church's notability can be documented back to 1978, even if the overwhelming majority of it centers on the political activism of its pastors and congregation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:FART)

Comment: meets GNG,  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)