Deletion of André Aciman

Comment: That said, it would seem the subject is notable. Others have already found that there are plentiful sources, but his title/position at the CUNY satisfies  #5 &ndash; person holds ... "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education, and would alone be sufficient. Respectfully
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Lots of sources out there, hundreds of gnews, gbooks hits. Among other points, reviews of his books qualify him under , and are perfectly acceptable as sources for an article on him. As the most famous book is a memoir, biographical detail (from reviews) is not lacking  and privacy concerns are thus minimal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: passes . Notable people have articles; if problems arise with them, you fix the article, rather than deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Folks, this line debate is superfluous. It's clear that he passes on  #5 alone because of his "Distinguished Professor" title at City University of New York|CUNY. Continue debating if you like, but the closing admin will give a "keep" verdict on this one. Respectfully
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)