Deletion of Two Guys from Andromeda

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: For now, I think  applies. Its not the best article on WP, but it shows signs of potential. It has a lot of things wrong with it: Smells of press release, reads like a resume of the people involved with very little mention of the company, messy layout with no narrative flow and its in need of extra sources. - BUT, the majority of sources are reliable and have been agreed upon by consensus at /RS. Following the principle of , I think the article should have been tagged, left for a couple of months and then nominated if no improvements were made. I have tagged the article with reference and cleanup tags
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:VG)

Comment: There is significant coverage in several reliable sources, so it looks like it passes .  If the consensus has established that the sources are reliable, then they shouldn't be discounted just because they're not mainstream
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per list of |reliable sources that provide coverage on the subject, that I listed above. Passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)