Deletion of International Union of Young Farmers

Comment: Article seems to fail both |notability and |verifiabilty criteria. The article (since its earliest version) makes assertions that are completely unsourced - any sources offered do not make any reference to the body. Moreover, there seem to be no sources online that would verify these claims. For example, the article asserts that this NGO was founded  as a result of "the UN General Assembly call in the year 2000 (resolution 54/120 year 1999, articles 3, 14, 15)"; however the resolution in question, 54/120, (http://www.un.org/events/youth2000/a_54_120e.pdf (PDF here) is a general call for earlier youth-related resolutions to be implemented (or continued) and does not in any way make mention of this organization; any assertion that this organization was a direct result (or even an indirect result) of a UN resolution would of course have to be backed by references. I cannot find '''any''' mention of this being the case, regardless of whether the mention is from a reliable source or not, apart from the website of the IUYF and Wikipedia mirrors. (In an aside, because of the longevity of this article, there are a lot of websites that mirror the text of the Wiki article.) The article also claims "IUYF members are associations and persons from Ireland, Great Britain, Germany, Austria, Italy, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Moldavia, Russia and USA" without mentioning ''which'' associations; however, approaching that issue from the other direction, a Google search doesn't seem to produce any farming organizations or associations claiming to be members. Granted my search was only limited to an English language search, but as the article claims membership in Ireland, the US and the UK, it would hardly be unreasonable to expect that at least one of the farming organizations would mention on their websites that they were associated with the IUYF. More problems are encountered with the assertion that the IUYF, according to the article,  has "Consultative Status with the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe|Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. That is an assertion that would '''have''' to be backed by independent sources - this is an extraordinary assertion not to have any sourcing, whether provided  or found. As pointed out by the nominator, the only mentions that he could find that could be considered as |reliable sourcing were in passing and negative in tone and looking at a translation of one of the articles, I agree; an article based on these alone would not be tenable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)