Deletion of Martha Copp

Comment: as the subject has written a book with over 600 citations.  As far as her other works are concerned, the subject however only has an h-index of around 8 (which is probably not good enough even in a not-so-high citation field such as sociology).  Other arguments the nominator raised (written like a resume, paywalled references, etc.), are no reason for deletion -- tag it up for cleanup instead; see  and . — '''Stringy Acid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: GS cites seem a bit slender yet for rof#C1, maybe oo soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: I am very much on the fence, pretty much just like Stringy Acid, but leaning the other directioon. One co-authored book with decent citations, everything else on the lower side, no indication of meeting   otherwise. I couldn't find information on any awards, honor, nobody has written so much as a sentence calling her important in the field. I am a sociologist but not in this field, so the fact that I haven't heard of her doesn't matter, but still, publishing one book which got some citations but no reviews of itself... I am afraid that doesn't cut it. Her publication record is decent but not outstanding, and I don't think decent is enough for encyclopedia. Ping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)