Deletion of Divine Brown (sex worker)

Comment: per commenters above, as subject has exploited her own fame similar to Monica Lewinsky which is also passable under  guidelines.  http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: passes "involvement in news events" criterion of , and notability does not expire. Continues to be referenced in the news in relation to that event: see http://news.google.com/news?um=1&tab=wn&client=firefox-a&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=divine.brown current Google News results
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Seemingly bad-faith nom that clearly does not meet community standards. Please remember that #Notability_requires_objective_evidence_and_does_not_expire|notability does not expire. If independent, verifiable sources exist, there should be an article about the subject. This is the case with Divine Brown, and therefore the article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)