Deletion of Financial freedom

Comment: not necessarily with prejudice.  The term itself may be worthy of some article, somewhere down the line.  The instant text doesn't seem all that helpful (mostly it boils down to "financial freedom = being rich") and it also seems chock full of |original research:''The statement Financial Freedom is used by financial institutions to convince the public to give them their money thinking that these very institutions will achieve financial freedom for the public, when in fact it further creates financial freedom for the institutions and the public gets what's left. Only people can create financial freedom for themselves. Most people lack the needed financial education to create wealth therefore they fall prey to sales promises.''Strip out the tautology and original research, and there isn't anything left
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: No prejudice against breaking the redirect and recreating if and when an editor wants to make an ACTUAL article.  Don't bother merging.  There isn't anything in this worth putting into another article (as of this comment).  Matter of fact, I'll |just do that right now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: Having considered my view after initially coming accross the page by chance, I feel that if the phrase is not a |newly coined neologism, then the article is clearly a |dictionary definition which is seriously inlikely to ever be expanded beyond that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:DICDEF)