Deletion of Eirikur Bergmann

Comment: I think the subject passes  because he was elected to Iceland's constitutional commission. The article also has sources sufficient to pass GNG.  It is bad to have autobios but I don’t think there’s a good case for deletion here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: This is actually a difficult one - it's clearly an autobio,  requires significant coverage of local politicians, a constitutional council isn't something which would necessarily qualify, possible but not clear academic, possible but not clear writer. Lots of potential notability hooks. The issue is there's nothing in the article yet which shows anyone has taken notice of him, with the exception of a brief blurb - we've got an interview which typically don't count and a book review which is prefaced that the author of the book review is a long time friend of Bergmann, which I would assume is fairly common in Iceland. The best one is the blurb and a single two-star book review in Timarit.is. The sources provided by TKSnaevarr aren't helpful, either, as they're links to databases - Visir shows he's authored a lot of articles, ruv shows he's been quoted a bit. I'd really like two or three additional sources to put his notability beyond doubt, an additional book review, a profile on him, a discussion on him that doesn't quote him. Also, I'm probably a weak delete right now, but I have no problems with TKSnaevarr's !vote, does not appear to be a traditional SPA
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)