Deletion of Ruth Zukerman

Comment: even just looking at the first page of Google News, there is enough coverage to pass . While I have no doubt that some sources might have been paid for, as per Rhododendrites, there's no way that some of these reputable media sources would put a promotional article up without some sort of disclaimer. Even the ''Daily Mail'' puts a disclaimer up when they run a promo piece
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: All the coverage on the article is press-releases, dependent sources or primary in the form of the odd interview. Fails  and .  Lets go through the first page of Google News, today on the 26 October 2020
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIO)