Deletion of Arora Akanksha

Comment: as page creator.  says that "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline." I would argue that Arora passes the  due to the specific coverage of her in reliable sources. Although I agree her candidacy has essentially no chance, the coverage of her as an individual is high-quality. It's not as though she's running for a County Board seat somewhere - as you imply, this is a high-profile position
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: there is pretty clearly adequate news coverage, and it doesn't seem that anyone's disputing that particular point. Invoking  here isn't right because she pretty clearly has a significant role in the selection, even if it doesn't end up translating into a win or even a plausible showing. Just the candidacy is unusual. The difference between this case and Shahid Buttar's case (linked above) is that it's routine for American congresspeople to have primary challengers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per : "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  notes that unelected candidates "can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Those claiming she passes GNG should note that all the sources are firmly in the  territory. Consensus is that candidates for public office that received disproportionate election coverage because they were running a hopeless campaign against a high-profile incumbent were still to be excluded from Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahid Buttar (3rd nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: probably - there's good international coverage of her run for the UN seat, but this really feels like a  to me. I don't think this is particularly significant per BLP1E#3
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The subject is most likely failing NPOL. But her notability can be easily established by general notability criteria. She has recieved plenty of significant coverage from multiple reliable sources which makes her easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)