Deletion of Luma Health

Comment: per . This subject passes  independent sources exist so it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: If we ignore some of the business listings and company profiles, there are sources that meet both  and . As
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IS)

Comment: Usual variety startup 'invest in us/buy us' spam. Sources are either primary or business-as-usual. Fails . 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:CORPSPAM)

Comment: I'm not sure whether the funding pieces do not meet . Perhaps you meant that it's a single event, thus it is not significant? I see there are multiple reliable secondary sources from May 2018, May 2019, August 2019, September 2019. So the references do not revolve around a single event. Moreover, the pieces on The Wall Street Journal and VentureBeat were done by staff reporters, independent of the subject, and both articles provide significant coverage of the company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: does not meet  / . Run-of-the-mill private company going about its business
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:ORGDEPTH)