Deletion of Spiritual ecology

Comment: I have also found several reliable external sources on the subject as well, including academic courses: http://fore.yale.edu/education/resources/syllabi/fish1/ program at Yale University with instructor Lorraine M. Fish, http://fore.yale.edu/news/item/leslie-sponsel-on-spiritual-ecology-connection-and-environmental-change/ article also published by Yale by Leslie Sponsel, http://www.hawaii.edu/malamalama/2007/09/f1-ecology.html a class at the University of Hawaii, and http://www.ciis.edu/academics/graduate-programs/ecology-spirituality-and-religion this course at CIIS on Ecology, Spirituality, and Religion, http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln481/SpiritualEcology.htm course work from Kenyon College, http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TJSS201005011.htm from Journal of China West Normal University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), and http://www.eiine.com/rise/spiritual-ecology-eassys/anthropological-contributions-to-spiritual-ecology Anthropological Contributions to Spiritual Ecology. Found additional news sources such as http://www.theecologist.org/ecologist_partners/2574971/spiritual_ecology_hearing_the_cry_of_the_earth.html Ecologist Magazine, http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/eco-spirituality-values-based-economic-structure the Guardian (UK), and http://www.motherearthnews.com/nature-and-environment/nature/spiritual-ecology-of-the-new-planet-ze0z1504zken.aspx from Mother Earth News, and http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6/21/1395326/-For-a-spiritual-ecology-Pope-Francis-in-his-own-words the dailykos.com, and http://www.elephantjournal.com/2015/10/spiritual-ecology-a-paradigm-shift-for-a-healthy-planet/ Elephant Journal, http://spiritualecologyalliance.org/category/spiritual-ecology/ Reflections on the Parliament of the World’s Religions, from The Salish Sea Spiritual Ecology Alliance, and http://ae.americananthro.org/index.php/leslie-sponsel-on-spiritual-ecology-connection-and-environmental-change/ Spiritual Ecology from the Anthropology and Environment Society of the American Anthropological Association and http://www.parliamentofreligions.org/content/sacred-ecology-changing-story from the Parliament of World Religions )  The article topic is valid and encyclopedic, I also think it does not Fail 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The copyright issue has been addressed and removed. In looking at the history of this page on Wikipedia about Spiritual Ecology, it was started in 2004, and has evolved significantly since then with contributions from many different editors and resources. Three years ago the page was further developed, with various editors contributing more recent references and resources on the subject, include in-depth history and the more recently published books, academic studies, and other work. The page has of course changed and continued to evolve — in viewing the history you can see several editors both from within the field and outside of the field, who have contributed corrections, edits, and new resources. As this is an emerging area of study, the Wikipedia page serves as a encyclopedic resource which clearly continues to evolve as new sources come available, and has continued to provide a valuable resource for research and reference materials on the subject. There are now 3 votes to keep the page (both here and on the 'talk" section), and as a contributing editor to the page, I also agree it does not Fail 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I found discussion about this topic in a number of reliable sources (see, e.g., http://www.huffingtonpost.com/llewellyn-vaughanlee/spiritual-ecology-climate-change_b_790499.html this article in the Huffington Post, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/iskcon-govardhan-eco-village-to-hold-two-day-meet-on-spiritual-ecology/articleshow/49548387.cms this article from The Economic Times, http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2010/07/30/128871323/spiritual-ecology-a-universal-grounding this story from NPR, and https://books.google.com/books?id=go5hCQAAQBAJ this book published by Routledge). If the article does, indeed, violate copyright, then we may need to break out the , but I don't think this fails 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:GNG)

Comment: because , but I do think the article needs to be cut in half. There has been an attempt to conflate certain fringey views with the concepts actually discussed in the many sources that a google news search easily turns up, and this needs to be corrected. But I don't agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: and Wikipedia:Basic copyediting|copy edit per sources. In addition to sources listed above in this discussion, entire books exist about the topic; passes : http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674034952, https://books.google.com/books?id=ezDTNAEACAAJ, https://books.google.com/books?id=VIxwDLdcxuEC&printsec=frontcover, https://books.google.com/books?id=h7ta_5oEDhcC, https://books.google.com/books?id=ZZNmq1iJP4MC, https://books.google.com/books?id=p45hCQAAQBAJ, https://books.google.com/books?id=K5AaI2PhiV8C
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)