Deletion of Peter Lu

Comment: ec) The discovery of ancient Penrose tilings did get a lot of press, quite arguably enough for the notability of a discoverer.  This http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2006_02_17/profile_peter_lu/(parent)/158 profile, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NR&d_origin=transcripts&z=NR&p_theme=nr&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=108B4C0DD55B7E06&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM this NPR interview and gnews searches http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Peter+J.+Lu%22&sa=N&lnav=m "Peter J. Lu" or http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Peter+Lu%22+tiling&sa=N&lnav=m  "Peter Lu" tiling  go toward satisfying  and  WP:PROF # 7. Lu is clearly much more notable - at least 30-40 or more gnews hits on this Peter Lu - than just "any post-doc research scientist working in a university
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Does not seem to pass notability requirements under  or . Citation impact http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sauthors=%22Peter+J+Lu%22 is promising, with even a Science piece (co-authored with well-known professor Paul Steinhardt; with only 16 citations in Google Scholar), but some time is still needed to establish notability in my opinion. Has a good chance of attaining notability in the future, but is not yet at that stage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Might I add that mention on news websites does not meet notability requirements in either  or . Special:Contributions/131.111.243.37|131.111.243.37
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)