Deletion of New Kadampa Tradition Survivors

Comment: I gather from discussions above that the creation of this article may have sprung from attempts by other editors to suppress criticism of NKT on that article's page. My !vote remains the same; however I suggest that the proper method to address any imbalance on the NKT article's POV is to enlist more eyes and redress the  problems of that article, including the lack of reporting what seems to be well-deserved and  criticism of the organization. There are proper channels to go through for this; unfortunately this article wasn't one and isn't merited
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS)

Comment: or '''Merge''' (into New Kadampa Tradition, where it belongs, if anywhere). I'm not seeing that this is an actual official organization -- there is no website linked at the bottom, no Google hits under that title. And only 45 Google hits under https://www.google.com/search?q=%22new+kadampa+survivors%22&num=100&newwindow=1&filter=0&biw=1187&bih=967&dpr=0.9 "New Kadampa Survivors" and only 66 for https://www.google.com/search?num=100&newwindow=1&q=%22NKT+Survivors%22&oq=%22NKT+Survivors%22&gs_l=serp.3..0l2j0i30.53102.59633.0.59948.4.4.0.0.0.0.135.468.0j4.4.0....0.0..1c.1.58.serp..0.4.465.orJij_8Vcpo "NKT Survivors" -- all of them blog and forum posts. Even if there were an informal collection of dissident former members, informal collections of dissident former members of any sect or group or even cult do not merit Wikipedia articles. Does not pass  or any other notability requirement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , also lacks reliable sources, currently there are three refs to the same source which is supposed to be counted as one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)