Deletion of Ricco Wright

Comment: The article cites |Reliable third party sources that are independent of the subject. Also, this article does not have one sole contributer, it has been edited by many different editors and was created through the |Articles for Creation process. It does appear that he received quite a  bit of coverage in a incident that occurred in 2007, http://www.nysun.com/new-york/columbia-defends-professor-in-noose-incident/65043/ http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/23/professor.lawsuit/ http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NR&d_origin=transcripts&z=NR&p_theme=nr&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=11C401AB050DB768&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM ( may apply). Much of the biography section relies on tc.edu, which is a primary source so it must be replaced. If replacements cannot be found, then the article should be deleted or tagged with Template:BLP primary sources. I also see that the article has some |neutral point of view issues, but they can be addressed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:AFC||WP:BLP1E||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Appears to have had a few minutes of peripheral fame regarding a one-time incident that happened to someone else in 2007, but that's about it. This article is basically just a gigantic vanity piece about his going to college and essential all . Uncontroversial delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)