Deletion of Jocelyn Wildenstein (2nd nomination)

Comment: per , . Meets : {{Find sources|Jocelyn Wildenstein|divorce}}, {{Find sources|Jocelyn Wildenstein|surgery}}, currently pared back per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BLP||WP:AVOIDVICTIM)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a |gossip magazine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GOSSIP)

Comment: Article was rewritten from scratch and all information in it is currently sourced from .  Notability has been established by several published books and many news articles (), including reliable secondary sources independent of the subject.  The references cite the subject's spending habits, cosmetic surgery, and divorce as notable, so the other article's reasons for deletion  and  no longer seem to apply.  The article is verifiable, written from an NPOV, and contains no original research . . . so seems to stand as a viable biography.  While it is still in a stub state at the moment, there is much more information available about the subject and no reason the article can't be further expanded.  Deleting all information contained and redirecting to the article as the nominator has attempted to do seems a bit rash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP1E||WP:N)