Deletion of London Buses route 403

Comment: I see alot of Keeps and alot of unrelated essays quoted but I don't see any sources that establish notability..... The  and  !votes should probably be ignored
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: It beggars belief that a London bus route which existed for nearly 100 years would not be notable.  I have no difficulty finding coverage in sources such  as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WHZdAAAAIAAJ this''.  The worst case is that we'd merge into some more general page such as List of London bus routes and so, per  and  there is no case for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: to List of bus routes in London. While I agree with {{u|11Expo}}'s sentiment, policy and guidelines are relatively clear that the subject does not pass . Following the consensus established in , the redirect is the best option
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: as noted above, individual bus routes are typically not notable. They have an ephemeral nature compared to other transportation corridors, so unless -level sourcing is added, this one doesn't surpass the bar for inclusion as a stand-alone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of bus routes in London. Longevity does not estabilish notability for a  bus route
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:RUNOFTHEMILL)