Deletion of Rule 34 of the Internet

Comment: This iteration of the article does have slightly more references than the one that I AfD'ed last May, but they are all very passing mentions and I still see no indication of notability. If this is deleted again, it should probably be |salted as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: this is a well-enough known internet meme to have an article on an Encyclopedia |that is not paper. I see no reason to delete - but I suspect that this article is suffering from having been deleted before, and is therefore now having even higher hurdles applied to it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: per nom. I see no reason whatsoever why we should |relax the notability criteria for this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: I am very saddened to say this because I know how much of "A Big Deal" rule 34 is, but fact of the matter is the page is irreparably in need of attention. It is entirely composed of |unreliable sources and I doubt that it is likely that we will be able to find such reliable sources. What's worse is that there are claims in the article that use these unreliable sources and create completely new claims out of them, such as the claim "The meme is believed to have orginated on the 4chan imageboard." In fact, the source says that nowhere at all, it merely says "Humanity wants porn, so as image board website 4chan noted with Rule #34- if it exists there is porn of it." This doesn't say that it was created at 4chan, only that it was noted there. It's simple but severe problems like these that put this article beyond hope for repair right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)