Deletion of Manuel Cidre

Comment: The existence of a smattering of campaign coverage is not, in and of itself, a -based exemption from having to satisfy  — ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election can ''always'' show some evidence of campaign coverage, so if that were how it worked then every candidate would always get that exemption and NPOL itself would be inherently meaningless because nobody would ever actually have to meet it at all anymore. Rather, people who ran for election and lost get into Wikipedia in only one of two ways: either (a) they can demonstrate that they were ''already'' notable enough for a Wikipedia article for other reasons ''independently'' of the candidacy (the Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) they can show a depth and range of coverage that marks them out as much ''more'' notable than the norm for unelected political candidates, in some way that would pass the |ten-year test for enduring significance (the Christine O'Donnell test). Neither of those tests have been passed here, and the article is written much more like a résumé than a proper encyclopedia article — and even people who do pass NPOL by actually holding a notable political office ''still'' don't get to keep articles written like résumés
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:10YT)

Comment: passes the |GNG. Covered in many major newspaper articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)