Deletion of Characteristics of common wasps and bees

Comment: as a table aggregating encyclopedic information.  Many similar comparison tables exist in Wikipedia and are useful to our readers.  (See Comparison of operating systems for a single example.)  This comparison table format which has proven useful to our readers.  This page is moderately linked internally and is well-linked externally.  The information on the page is clearly sourced on the respective pages about each insect.  The subset of information that's unsourced is, of course, eligible for removal but that does not require AfD to resolve.  As a side note, we had a lengthy debate on Talk a few years ago about the 'sting levels'.  I shared the skepticism expressed above but the consensus at the time was to leave it in.  If the consensus has changed, |be bold and take it out.  That doesn't require deletion to remediate.  While the scope of the page is appropriate to debate (that is, whether bald-faced hornets are "common"), again, that debate is appropriate to hold on the article's Talk page, not in an AfD discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BB)