Deletion of Alex Rafalowicz (2nd nomination)

Comment: With only a few minor roles (two in albeit notable movies), subject fails .  However, the additional mentions of activity in United Nations Youth Association of Australia advances notability claims
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: The article reads like a resume listing a bunch of activities that, while verifiable, do not confer notability (various positions in student organizations). The sources are pretty flimsy as well. That covers the  claim. He fails  by a mile or so, I won't bother to detail that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: I'm not sure how this page could be "improved" to show greater notability. Considering the long edit history, and the long period of time since his appearance in the films, surely any true notability could already have been established. It seems that any improvement of this article would come from the subject securing a major film role or otherwise doing something that established actual notability, but that would then make keeping the article a violation of .--Special:Contributions/98.233.11.61|98.233.11.61
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Subject is not notable. Merely appearing as an "extra" or getting a passing reference in a movie review does not suffice under  or . Also, subject's student activities are not notable in line with . As the talk page for this article suggests, there are thousands of students across the world who hold positions in student/youth organisations and this does not warrant a Wikipedia article. In fact, many members of the ''actual'' United Nations do not have a Wikipedia entry, and I do not see why a Youth Ambassador ought to have one. As noted above, noone disputes the veracity of this article, but that is not the point. Not only must the entries be true, they must also be noteworthy, which, in this case, it is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BIO)

Comment: as he does not meet the notability criteria.  All sources presented thus far are merely directory type entries, which are not usually held to establish notability.  While he has been in notable films, the parts that he has had in them would appear to be minor bit parts.  It would seem that he does not meet the  notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)

Comment: While most of these don't qualify for , I'd argue that they can confer notability if there are enough of them. For instance, he turns up several times in http://books.google.com/books?sa=N&tab=np&q=%22Alex%20Rafalowicz%22 a Google Book search, he has a http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/alex_rafalowicz/ Rotton Tomatoes page, and he has a http://movies.nytimes.com/person/200651/Alex-Rafalowicz/filmography New York Times page. However, he really hasn't acted in any other major roles, so his notability is shaky
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)