Deletion of Udayanga Weeratunga

Comment: per the source I listed above, the MiG scandal is not sufficient for encyclopedia notability at this time.  possibly applies; the subject is not yet notable, per available sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I think this just narrowly passes both  and , and his corruption case seems to have generated substantial press coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:CRIME)

Comment: While the |consensus, based on many |past deletion debates, is that diplomats do ''not'' normally pass |our specific standards, in this case an ambassador to a world power would ''probably'' be notable. I'd agree to "userfication" until better sources were found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: If being ambassador to Russia and notoriety about illegally selling arms in Ukraine isn't notable enough, a quick Google search shows that he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)