Deletion of Daniel W. Nebert

Comment: While it was a near case for  when presented for deletion, the article is much improved after work from non-COI editors.  The subject is a clear pass of  C1 and C3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NPROF)

Comment: Subject clearly and easily passes #C1, at least. So the question is not whether he's notable, it's whether the current article is salvageable or not per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TNT)

Comment: per . There's one citation-needed tag left as I write, but that's hardly cause for deletion. As I wrote much earlier, he clearly passes . And if the promotionalism returns, we have a good enough version to revert to and protect rather than needing to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:PROF)