Deletion of Drastic Team

Comment: Hemiauchenia sums up the issues with the article, and in any case I'm sceptical that it meets  (which is the standard required for organisations like these, not GNG). For example: The non-substantial mention in WAPO is an opinion piece, not usable for organisation notability. Per RSP, CNET is generally reliable for {{tq|technology-related articles}} -- medicine is way outside their specialty
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: Putting aside any critique of the group, and simply focusing on notability, it is obvious to me this easily meets  on the basis of multiple, reliable sources such as Vanity Fair and The Hindu
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Hemiauchenia (both the WaPo and the ''Telegraph'' items are opinion pieces, and we've no reason to consider CNET reliable for the subject) and the  concern raised by ProcrastinatingReader
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: per , the popular press are often not reliable for scientific claims. As for the CNET piece, it is lovlingly PROFRINGE. As for RSP, the last discussion on the reliability of CNET was 6 years ago, and it states that {{tq|CNET is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles.}}, not reliable in general, and lab-leak claims fall well outside CNET's wheelhouse in consumer electronics, and the coverage has not been mirrored by other more reputable news sources. As for the other articles, they are incidental mentions and do not consitute SIGCOV
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDPOP)

Comment: The group passes . The group has received in-depth coverage from the sources listed above, as well as ''https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2021-06-05/los-detectives-de-internet-que-han-sembrado-dudas-sobre-el-origen-de-la-pandemia.html El País''. There's a risk of , but I am not moved by it owing to the length of time corresponding to their coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Investigations into the origin of COVID-19 per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDPOP)