Deletion of Ruby Muhammad

Comment: Leaning towards "delete". Ruby Muhammad's main claim to noatbility is her claims of advanced age, the accuracy or otherwise of which have been the subject of humungous discussions at Talk:Ruby Muhammad. However, longevity (or claims of longevity) are not evidence of notability, so the relevant test in .So far, I see only one source which comes close to be useful in a GNG assessment: http://www.sacobserver.com/news/020508/ruby_muhammad_scooter.shtml  "Mother Muhammad Goes Mobile", in The Sacramento Observer.  That's not enough to meet GNG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Try actually reading what I posted. I cited five sources from five separate years. They are not "one source" as has been misstated. They are not duplicates. The standard of notability is not "whether she is really 113 years old" versus a "mere" 103, or whether she is "really an influential religious leader"  as opposed "merely" to an elderly lady called "The Mother of Islam" by religious leaders.  just requires significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, which has been presented. It is inappropriate and unconvincing to argue that the newspapers are all "unreliable" because they state she was born 10 years before the original research of Wikipedia editors and others suggests. We judge by what is cited, not by "truth" based on original research in census records. There are more sources at Google News archive
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Whether she is really 103 or 113, she has had coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources as being a well known figure within her religious movement, and as someone thought, correctly or not , to have been born in the 19th century. The continued significant coverage in newspapers satisfies , regardless of its truth in the eyes of some independent researchers. We determine whether someone is noted, not whether all claims about them which are noted are in fact true. I absolutely do not agree that originaal research in census records negate newspaper coverage over many years. See continuing significant coverage in http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=zCAyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=faIFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4994,4443597&dq=ruby-muhammad&hl=en 2003,  http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/content?oid=69975 2006, http://www.sacobserver.com/news/020508/ruby_muhammad_scooter.shtml 2008(noted above), http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/19768/The_Mother_of_Sacramento  2009, http://www.sacbee.com/2010/02/17/2542081/112-year-old-plans-to-give-a-performance.html  2010
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)