Deletion of Gatchaman (2011 film)

Comment: In my further expanding and sourcing, I find that the topic is notable in that it has become a well-documented case of an ongoing production hell whose length and scope of coverage has made it worthy of inclusion per guideline.  Completed or not, released or not, it is the failure of the Imagi's processes that gives the continued coverage that meets the ... and not surprisingly, sometimes continued failure can be more notable than success.  What say we perhaps retitle it as a well-sourced stand-alone spin-off of Imagi Animation Studios?  Something like Gatchaman (Imagi film project).  If (or when) the film is released, it can be returned to a title reflecting its release date for future expansion of the film itself and its cast. Seems this could then be a win-win for Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per satisfying 's "''All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred.  It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced.''": http://io9.com/5034977/gatchamans-super+starship-phoenix-soars-over-city io9, http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990336.html?categoryid=13&cs=1 Variety, http://io9.com/5032162/gatchaman-movie-will-look-more-anime-less-photorealistic io9, http://www.star-ecentral.com/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/4/movies/2931245&sec=movies Mayasia Star, http://www.homemediamagazine.com/news/imagi-seeks-licensing-deals-gatchaman-15994 Home Media Magazine, http://io9.com/5308900/your-first-glimpse-of-gatchamans-defenders-of-the-earth io9, http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117988515.html?categoryid=13&cs=1 Variety, http://io9.com/5139671/cool-your-boot-jets-astro-boy-still-zooming?skyline=true&s=x io9, http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0202/072.html Forbes, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-158017185.html Wireless News, http://www.star-ecentral.com/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/4/movies/2871865&sec=movies Malaysia Star, http://www.animationmagazine.net/article.php?article_id=5526 Animation Magazine, http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=18344 Coming Soon 1, http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=21050 Coming Soon 2, http://www.animationmagazine.net/article/8624 Animation Magazine, http://io9.com/5046825/come-fly-the-friendly-skies-of-gatchaman-air io9, http://www.mysinchew.com/node/31184 Sin Chew Jit Poh, http://www.comicus.it/view.php?section=rubriche&id=1298 Comicus, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/asia/hong-kong/e3i6ca0e7bf02077d7a5c30b82f541e453c Hollywood Reporter,  http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/05/10/no-speed-racer-no/ Clarksville Online, http://www.animationmagazine.net/article/6707 Animation Magazine, http://www.awn.com/news/people/imagi-expands-us-creative-team Animation World Network... and dozens upon dozens of others over 5 years.  They've already sold the rights to manufacture and distribute the film's action figures http://www.activeanime.com/html/content/view/1977/58/ Active Anime.  Heck... there was even a teaser trailer released in 2009 http://www.animationmagazine.net/article/8878 Animation Magazine, http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/SuperGamer/news/?a=8416 Comic Book Movie, http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=7579 Superhero Hype.  In my opinion, the widespread coverage of the film's production allow it to merit an article. With respects to Krebmarkt, even were the film to never be made, this topic merits an individual article. No merge or redirect is neccessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)