Deletion of Cannabis dispensary

Comment: For me, the argument that  applies here is the decisive factor. It doesn't matter how an article was started to be written. What matters is whether it can be improved into a keep-able state
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: There are sufficient RS citations to easily pass GNG, though the article does need cleaning up. The structure and flow of the article is a bit muddled and it needs (better) sourcing for, or removal of, several paragraphs. However, per , none of these problems are sufficiently serious to be a valid reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)