Deletion of Alois Purgathofer

Comment: His papers http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&cluster=6145353066961292795 Radial velocities of planetary nebulae (third of four authors, 148 cites in GS) and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&cites=6834487208916428099 UBV sequences in selected star fields (solo author, 48 cites in GS) would seem to satisfy  #3 "An academic work may be significant or well known if ... it is widely cited by other authors in the academic literature". ISI Web of Knowledge doesn't list the UBV paper but otherwise looks very similar (an identical 148 cite count for the radial velocity paper, not high for any other paper). The number of publications in Web of Knowledge (12) is not high but Google scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=20&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=author%3Aa-purgathofer&btnG=Search lists a more respectable 41
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Has a http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22A+Purgathofer fair number of publications (unless there's another "A. Purgathofer" working in astronomy), but I'm afraid I'm not qualified to assess whether they qualify him under .  Would appreciate comment from someone better-versed in the field.  Certainly not a speedy candidate, though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)