Deletion of Katie Gately

Comment: A simple Google news search shows that this subject meets . AfD is not clean up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Think of a musical artist as a kind of author. We allow notability for authors to be based, in part, on book reviews so the reviews of the subjects music by reliable sources should be allowed. This sealed my assessment which was leaning delete before looking at the sources provided by {{u|Beccaynr}} above. Had it only been the interviews and a few mentions, even in reliable sources, I probably would have went with delete. The additional sources (reviews) leads me to believe the subject is notable and passes both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: per /SOURCES, Pitchfork_(website)|Pitchfork, Paste (magazine)|Paste, The Quietus, Resident Advisor, and Tiny Mix Tapes are all listed as generally reliable for music-related articles. I have added several reviews, including from ''The Guardian'', ''Paste'', and ''Pitchfork'', as well as a 2016 interview from the ''Guardian''.  Per BIO, Gately has {{tq|been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician}}, and per , she appears to be {{tq|frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable music sub-culture
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:NMUSICOTHER)