Deletion of Ogi Ogas (2nd nomination)

Comment: per notability and coverage for more than just one thing.  If the nominator is concerned about the current article being narowly focused, that's a reason to expand the focus... not delete the article.  anyone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: While the article may stylistically focus on his appearance on ''Millionaire'' as a contestant, that is not the only event for which he is notable. Regardless, there are sufficient sources presented to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: once a topic is notable then it is always notable.  Once an entry passes otability is always does so into the future, so it stays in.  There are enough sources here to establish that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I agree that his actual accomplishments seem a little slim, but that's not the standard we should be working with here. Someone is notable if they have been noted in reliable sources, regardless of our own opinions of the importance of their accomplishments. By that standard he clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)