Deletion of Talent Zoo

Comment: Also violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)

Comment: I believe this article now meets all the necessary criteria (specifically , , and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CORP||WP:WEB)

Comment: The article '''does not''' violate  &mdash; every bit of information is sourced. It also fulfils criteria for , which states that an article is notable if it meets "any one of the criteria". It meets this one: "it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself (''Forbes Magazine'', ''Atlanta Business Chronicle'' etc)." Do a google hit of this site, and you'll be presented with a hundred results. Additionally (and perhaps secondarily), the article is modelled from other similar articles like ''Simply Hired'' or ''CareerBuilder'', which are notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CORP)

Comment: this spam without prejudice against a proper article on the company, which may pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)