Deletion of Nieca Goldberg

Comment: With a GS h-index of 10, there is certainly no pass of rof in a ''very'' highly cited field.  is not passed and the BLP reads as if written by a PR operative
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: After cleanup she appears to pass  and . {{u|Vexations}}' concerns about "what exactly her clinical innovations are" are irrelevant: such innovations would be neither necessary nor sufficient to pass GNG or AUTHOR
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: meets  & . PROF is not relevant in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNN)