Deletion of Earliest living former members of the Australian House of Representatives

Comment: does not meet  and because 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOR)

Comment: per . I honestly can't make head or tail of how to interpret what's in this article, and the explanation by the creator above isn't very helpful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: a |tabulation that goes far beyond what the sources would tell us, this is as clear |synthesis as could be created in a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per Onetwothreeip and . Merge can be done if it's pruned enough to allow one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: If making the list requires you to set up and code a spreadsheet on your own, because the list hasn't already been compiled by outside sources, then by definition you're doing |original research — and the US list should most likely be deleted as well on the same grounds, but per  the fact that it hasn't ''already'' been deleted does not justify this list in and of itself. The reason such information tends to be hard to find is because it has no inherent value in the first place — identifying who was the first holder of any given political role to still be alive today is not a thing people need at all, because "earliest living" confers no special status on former politicians over and above other former politicians. If the information had any value at all, then the list would have already existed somewhere, and could have just been copied wholesale without having to fire up Excel to figure it out yourself — the fact that such outside sources ''don't'' exist is because people don't need the information ''at all''. Speaking as a Canadian, we've ended up with a lot of pointless content that had to be deleted, solely because somebody decided that Canada has to comprehensively replicate ''every'' "List of X" that the United States has, even if the topic has no actual meaning or relevance or applicability in Canada at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: There are many ways to tabulate representatives, but it is unclear what makes this one notable. The only way this could meet  is by demonstrating RSes that discuss this metric in particular
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)