Deletion of PetalMD

Comment: per . All the sources presented are purely promotional. This can be seen because each article is like a closed universe where the only views presented for each article are those connected with the company. For example, the first reference recounts testimonies derived from company promotional videos, and the article even states these are company promotional videos. I am amazed at that one. Given these are company promotional videos invalidates their testimony for purposes of notability. Then the presented view for the rest of the first reference is the company CEO. This is not an independent reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: Sources are sufficient to meet  and the ad-like content has been removed. I left out another reference which dated back to the company's early days and wasn't bringing anything new http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/affaires/actualite-economique/201008/27/01-4310527-petal-developpement-de-laide-pour-les-medecins.php. I also left out http://www.canhealth.com/blog/hopital-montfort-reduces-costs-and-saves-time-with-petalmd/ this source because I'm not sure who the author is but it explains how PetalMD has been deployed throughout Montfort Hospital which is not insignificant. "Promotional pressure" (whatever that means) is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and failing to meet CORPDEPTH. The sources being offered above are trivial or PR like. The first one is a blog (non RS), and the second has a promotional tone such as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)