Deletion of The People's Brexit Campaign

Comment: as failing , , and also #A7 and #G11 if it wasn't already at AfD.  I would have said to redirect to Communist Party of Britain but it turns out there are two of them &mdash; the other is Communist Party of Britain (Marxist–Leninist) &mdash; so I have no idea which to redirect to.  The subject fails /: This organization is not the subject of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject.  In fact the only mention I could find is in the article https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2019-02-23/morning-star-still-knots-over-brexit "Morning Star still in knots over Brexit" from 2019-02-20 on a London communist website (Alliance for Workers' Liberty), a source of unknown reliability, which alleges that there were letters written by "Alex Gordon of the People’s Brexit Campaign backed by the Communist Party of Britain".  (If it turns out the source is false, then that still leaves the organization with zero independent sources.)  The subject meets #A7 and #G11 also (though, to be fair, speedy deletion usually isn't appropriate once Articles for Discussion is underway): The article doesn't even make a Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance|credible claim of significance.  Being one of the multitudes of me-also "campaigns" that are on one side of Brexit or the other is not separately significant.  It just gives 2 sentences about the organization, then launches into a screed of talking points about Brexit itself.  (By the way, this "campaign" address is just a private mailbox service in London.)  The arguments against deletion, made by the article creator, are the usual "will be notable someday" (not valid criteria) and "censorship"/"I discovered |IAR and suddenly realized that my own emissions are so very important that no rules can ever apply" arguments (see , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:CSD||WP:CSD||WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:CSD||WP:CSD||WP:IAR||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: To {{replyto|Bakazaka}} this article does not have citation and please read  & 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Appears to be a front organization of the Communist Party of Britain, but there aren't even sufficient sources to support a brief mention in that article, let alone enough to support a standalone article. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: ping|Diggerty}} No one accused ''you'' of being a member of the Communist Party; only that "The People's Brexit" is a front for the Communist Party. You have https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AWikiDan61&type=revision&diff=885508610&oldid=884554288 explicitly stated that you "found this very interesting and informative article in a draft format and edited it as recommended by a previous reader." Your reaction here indicates that, rather than simply "coming across" this article, you may, in fact, be involved with this organization. If you are, that would be a |conflict of interest that I think you should disclose as part of this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)