Deletion of Islam Unveiled

Comment: But notable criticism of the book has to be there for the sake of , even if it is from partisan scholars. Of course, one must distinguish between criticism of Spencer and criticism of this specific book, with only the latter allowed in this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as clearly notable book by a NY Times Bestseller; is the nominator trying to make a  by this and similar nominations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: This is a bad-faith nomination that does not cite policy in its deletion reasoning. There is no precedent "very very notable" in the Wikipedia:Notability (books) proposed guideline or anywhere else (and by analogy, we should have almost no articles on television episodes or music albums if that were the case). The argument by analogy with Britannica is also outside of policy, as |Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. The argument against the author's "scholarship" is a content dispute and does not belong at AFD. If the author believes a merge is warranted, use appropriate templates for that proposal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)