Deletion of Mary Ann Mansigh

Comment: following  by {{u| Britishfinance}}.  The Springer volume is definitely significant coverage, and I think the other sources there are now enough to support.  I also agree that there's a possible  C1 case, per her (under-acknowledged) contribution to impactful scientific work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:NPROF)

Comment: I do not see how the sources (including the one mentioned by Gnomingstuff) constitutes |significant coverage. Kbabej's analysis is spot on. It is unfortunate that the article was not allowed to remain a draft, but now it has to meet the applicable notability criteria, and neither  nor  is met. She seems to have been a thoroughly competent programmer, but that is not grounds for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: Nominator claims to have done a  search, but in addition to the above sources, the first page of Google Books turns up coverage in a Springer publication: (https://www.google.com/books/edition/Computer_Meets_Theoretical_Physics/VCbsDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22mary+ann+mansigh%22&pg=PA45&printsec=frontcover
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)