Deletion of Christ the Redeemer selfie

Comment: An  would be to merge this to :Christ the Redeemer (statue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: The topic has received significant coverage in mainstream/international news sources, such as http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/southamerica/brazil/10869341/The-ultimate-travel-selfie-Christ-the-Redeemer-photo-captured-by-Briton.html, http://www.people.com/article/christ-the-redeemer-selfie-Lee-Thompson, http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/01/alleluia-is-this-selfie-at-the-top-of-brazils-christ-the-redeemer-statue-the-best-one-ever-4746550/, http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/watch-how-epic-christ-redeemer-3639710, so it passes . Sure, this could be merged, but the article would need to be retained in order to do so, and again, the topic is independently notable. Also, the article is about the photograph, how the photograph went viral, and also how the photograph was acquired, so I don't feel that WP:EVENT applies in a primary manner toward the overall topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: with reference to , I would consider an internet phenomenon which goes "overnight viral" then is promptly forgotten to be the internet version of an wiktionary:and finally|"And finally" story. That it later won some relatively unknown social media award lends no additional weight to its notability. And I agree with Tavix that it wouldn't be suitable to put this anywhere in the Christ the Redeemer (statue) article, and that even if there were an IPC section it would be a very low value bullet point on that list – therefore I'd delete the content outright rather than merge it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DOGBITESMAN)

Comment: We are an encyclopedia, not a collection of the latest viral internet meme.  If you need a policy to point to, try 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)