Deletion of Lenar

Comment: as not passing  -- no reliable, secondary in-depth sources on the company. Having notable games does not establish notability (). The article lists no GNG-suitable sources (one is almost empty directory listing, other is a brief mention and not focused on the subject and that site is not a /RS). Above wiki link is  and not reliable. Redirect would be suitable if target article had any info on the company, but none do. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:VG||WP:USERG)

Comment: Any qualification for '''Keep''' based on inability to locate sources should not get a pass because "something probably exists in print". Japan is Top 5 in world publishing market http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2012/map-of-the-publishing-world-favors-u-s-china-germany-japan/ but for purpose of this AfD, this means nothing. Limitation of EN search engine is not reasonable excuse for garbage article to exist. JP search engine shows information which points to this article being inconsequential. The games should be listed, but UNIC/Lenar/Astroll? . ''Parent notability should be established independently; notability is not inherited "up", from notable subordinate to parent, either: not every manufacturer of a notable product is itself notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)