Deletion of Arthur Kemp (3rd nomination)

Comment: And noting that I was the one who mentioned the problem of a alse concensus above early on
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F)

Comment: He fails , but not , which takes priority. He clearly does have significant coverage in reliable sources, which makes him notable. (Also,  only applies to Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individuals, i.e. people who don't seek out media attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Having read the definitions of notability for authors and journalists , politicians , and for low-profile, single events, and individuals , there can be no doubt that the article has no justification for existence on Wikipedia, per the definitions of notability as defined by Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: According to Wikipedia notability policy "Subjects notable for only one event" 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)