Deletion of Terence John Arbuthnot (2nd nomination)

Comment: In which case, it is definitely not a genuine "highest military decoration", so he doesn't get the exemption from normal  rules which that would give him under #Notability. The article, either through innocent mistake or deliberate omission (I'm certainly willing to assume the former) gives a misleading impression that he won the higher version. For the benefit of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MILITARY)

Comment: as failing  and , per Guy and Lar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: per Guy. Dodgy awards or not, that doesn't matter: there's just no evidence he passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Guy. Userify if there is anything of value to keep but I suspect that a bare recitation like this one doesn't have much to salvage. Unless this airman is much more notable than the article indicates and unless more varied and more reliable sources are introduced, this article utterly fails . Apparently there are a fair number of other Arbuthnot articles that need more close examination as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: abject failure of .  Guy Gibson|This is what a notable airman looks like. There do not appear to be ''any'' non-trivial sources independent of the Arbuthnot family for the article under discussion, and it is about bloody time that Kittybrewster discovered GenesReunited instead of trying to put his family tree on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Guy. failure of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)