Deletion of Blue hair (3rd nomination)

Comment: WP:IINFO indiscriminate collection of unrelated mentions of blue hair. No depth of coverage, and no sources drawing these isolated occurrences together into a common theme -- so no otability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The article has multiple good sources in which ''blue hair'' is part of the title such as ''Gods' blue hair in Homer and in eighteenth-dynasty Egypt''.  This demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that the topic is notable.  The nomination complains that the matter is trivial but provides no evidence to support this claim.  Blue hair, in fact, seems to be quite non-trivial because it is such an unnatural colour that it excites comment and is attributed to gods and other extraordinary people.  The appearance of blue hair in history and legend is good scholarly stuff while contemporary coverage is a matter of fashion which will be of interest to our neglected female readership.  There doesn't seem to be any policy-based case against the article - just variations on .  Our |editing policy is to keep such well-sourced and notable material and so it should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:PRESERVE)