Deletion of Electoral Calculus

Comment: article creator) per . The site is clearly {{xt|worthy of notice}}. {{xt|Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material}}.  states {{xt|Wikipedia should not have a separate article on any web content that does not meet the criteria of either this guideline or the general notability guideline ...}} (my underlining). Further sources which I don't expect I'll include any time soon are: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2010/04/28/a-note-on-electoral-constituency-boundaries/http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2010/04/09/state-of-the-race-9-april/http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2010/04/18/state-of-the-race-for-18-april/http://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2009/07/23/introducing-an-advanced-election-forecasting-system/http://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2011/07/28/what-vote-lead-will-labcon-need-for-a-majority/http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2009/07/could-tories-be-on-track-for-a-landslide/#axzz1vqzkLJGnhttp://blogs.reuters.com/uknews/2010/04/21/im-a-voter-in-a-safe-seat-and-feeling-unloved/http://blog.localdemocracy.org.uk/2010/03/30/election-websites-to-watch/http://www.compassonline.org.uk/news/item.asp?n=5620http://londonersdiary.standard.co.uk/2011/09/tory-soldier-with-a-fight-on-his-hands.htmlhttp://www.rerc.ac.uk/doc/GE20910_Issue_1.pdfhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/2010/04/28/a-note-on-electoral-constituency-boundaries/http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2010/01/fairseats.htmlhttp://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qZ_wNXtdNAwC&pg=SL18-PA66&dq=%22electoral+calculus%22+baxter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0hy_T6OuEoXV8gPv99XTCg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22electoral%20calculus%22&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NWEB)