Deletion of Crunchyroll Partners

Comment: why does this need a separate article? Seems like  Special:Contributions/76.66.193.90|76.66.193.90
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: the lead is indeed identical to Crunchyroll, and the list of partners does not belong here. It looks like someone is trying to use Wikipedia as |their own web host. I'm indifferent about G11; one could argue that |someone from the company is writing the article see this Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Chasewang and COI|ANI post and is using the pages as PR. However, |inclement weather indicates that it's doomed, anyway, so it's moot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:COI||WP:SNOW)

Comment: If Crunchyroll wants a list all of their partnerships, then they should host that list on their website, not on Wikipedia. (, ) The only time a partnership should be mentioned is briefly the Crunchyroll|main article if the partnership is covered by reliable third-party sources. I also don't see this as a viable search term either and it relies too much on  (which shouldn't be a redlink
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY||WP:NOTREPOSITORY||WP:ONESOURCE)