Deletion of List of sites running the LiveJournal engine

Comment: but only allow entries that are sufficiently notable to have their own wikipedia articles.  This seems to be the case, except that some of the articles haven't been written.  The list should exist primarily as a navigation aid with summary information only.  Most of the content belongs in the individual articles.  This article needs to be fixed, not deleted, as per |policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:EP)

Comment: I included a pointer to this discussion on Talk:LiveJournal — given the relative newness of this list as a separate article, my guess is that few people have it on their watchlists, and therefore that mentioning it on the LJ article's talk page will be more likely to attract informed participants to this discussion. I hope my message there is sufficiently neutral as not to run afoul of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS)

Comment: This list appears to be a |coatrack existing as a proxy for standalone articles on a series of websites that can't meet the standards of  by themselves.  If kept, it should be pruned back to a list of websites (as opposed to a series of promotional blurbs about said sites).  I generally don't like to advocate deletion for sub-articles that are forked off from larger ones for reason of length, but I don't think this material should've ever been a part of LiveJournal in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:V)

Comment: The list cannot be merged back because it gives |Undue weight to communities not related to the LJ community but the LJ software.  A few of these communities are probably notable enough for their own article.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)