Deletion of EuroLeague clubs performance comparison

Comment: The deletion request seems to be based purely on , with several Wikipedia policies linked often without a coherent narrative as to why it should be deleted. This leaves the onus on those wishing to keep the article without having a clear objection to discuss. This article, and similar articles should remain. Wikipedia policy cited included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Completely . The only reference is to a non-existent blog page. If WP is the source then .  is not an valid reason to keep. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTSOURCE||WP:OSE)

Comment: Article fails  for having only one citation, Issues with ,  with mini browsers and Accessibility browsers. It's weird to say that this is MOS:COLOR and ACCESS enabled when it clearly is not.  is a major concern with these type of articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:ACCESS||WP:NOSTATS)