Deletion of List of Kepler exoplanet candidates by ESI

Comment: The article is |mostly referenced to a primary source.  The paper "The Host Stars of Kepler's Habitable Exoplanets: Superflares, Rotation and Activity" cited in the article does mention the ESI, and so is certainly a secondary source for the existence of the ESI, but it is not a secondary source for the list under discussion.  The caltech exoplanet archive is here apparently being used as a "reference" for much of the content of the article, but it does not (as far as I can tell) discuss ESI, so there seem to be some  issues.  Others have pointed out  issues with using the "fictional" mass values as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS||WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO||WP:LISTN)

Comment: Arguing about notibility some news articles that I found nearly instantly do show that there ''is'' indeed intrest in Potentually habitable KOI's, (Ex http://www.outerplaces.com/science/item/11172-study-finds-earth-s-probability-of-being-habitable-is-82 1, http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/news/a16579/kepler-finds-earths-older-brother-planet/ 2). The topic itself of potentially habitable KOI's is notable as well as a handful of the KOI's themselves. {{tq|"''Even if editors personally believe an astronomical object is "important" or "inherently notable", astronomical objects are only accepted as notable if they have attracted notice in reliable sources.''"}} I do think this list passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: I think the underlying issue, of this and several other pages under regular AfD recently, is whether or not use of unique data contained at http://phl.upr.edu/projects/habitable-exoplanets-catalog/data Planetary Habitability Laboratory adheres to or violates . There is a discussion about this at WT:AST#Is Citing PHL/HEC in violation of WP:SELFPUB?, but it isn't receiving much participation, at least not enough to establish consensus. It would be prudent to suspend this and all related AfDs until that issue is resolved. &nbsp;&nbsp;~&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)