Deletion of Archimedes Plutonium (third nomination)

Comment: We have multiple reliable sources (indeed a large number of them). He easily meets . In fact some prior versions of this article used no referrences to usenet posts, so there really isn't any issue there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The man has spent over a decade single-handedly ensuring that he would be noticed by millions. He might be the ultimate Usenet personality, mainly because ''he very deliberately put himself into the public eye''. The article is sourced not just to a book that discusses him but also to his own writings which show that he has provided every scrap of information in the article and in the book ''of his own free will''. I don't see that  applies to him in the same way that it would a victim of child abuse. As regards his notability: virtually every longterm Usenet user knows about ol' PU - how many people is that? Ten million
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Everything ''except'' the fact that it's a real individual is a notable Internet meme.  In fact, it was a notable internet meme before there ''was'' an Internet.  If we need to excise the real name of the real individual to preserve , that would be fine. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)