Deletion of Estelle Lazer

Comment: Early career academics are not usually notable, as here. TV presence not yet enough for  oo soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:T)

Comment: My impression is that she passes both  and . There are several in-depth pieces specifically about her and her research in news-media, such as this ABC interview http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2013/11/22/3897011.htm, this piecehttp://riaus.org.au/articles/were-the-women-of-pompeii-really-fat-and-hairy/  in Australia's Science Channel, this piece http://www.smh.com.au/world/pompeiis-stories-continue-to-thrill-20130805-2r8lw.html in the Sydney Morning Herald, for example, as well as the sources quoted by K. e. coffman above. I think that's already enough to pass . Regarding , the case for satisfying this guideline becomes more clear if one looks at the substantive content of scholarly reviews of her work (rather than, say, simply counting the number of such reviews). In particular, these reviews say that she undertook the first modern scientific study of the skeletal remains from Pompei, and dispelled some common misconceptions (e.g. debunking the presumption that most victims of Pompei were childern, elderly and the infirm); see for example the `Cold cases' section of this https://www.world-archaeology.com/issues/pompeii.htm article in World Archeology
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)