Deletion of Pedro Pedrosa Mendes

Comment: as satisfying . "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work" - already demonstrated by the editors above. High h-index, absolutely no reason to dismiss co-authored work. I also don't see where  the "vanity" comes from
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: With nearly 20,000 citations on GS a wide pass of rof#C1https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=lDWW5J0AAAAJ. A mighty trout for the nominator for failing to carry out efore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:B)

Comment: per #C1. The nomination already said "the citations look impressive", and most academic publications these days are co-authored so pretending that science has to be done by a lone hero to be valuable makes no sense. The claim that he is "not the creator" of COPASI appears to be at best misleading — he created the predecessor system and led the development of COPASI itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)