Deletion of James Georgeff

Comment: per Anna. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Does he meet ? Yes.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCOLLATH)

Comment: Does he meet ?  No.  Why?  He hasn't received any significant coverage and those events that were just listed are not notable.  Does he meet ?  No.  Why?  He hasn't played in a fully professional league
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: wow, I must admit I didn't read the whole discussion, but this guy fails  as he hasn't played a match in a |fully pro league. Also fails  as he hasn't received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Also fails the three criteria listed in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG||WP:NCOLLATH)

Comment: Subject has not been shown to have ''played'' in a fully-professional league, so fails the |football (soccer)-specific notability guideline. Signing with or being drafted by a club in such a league isn't enough, and as pointed out somewhere above, the Portuguese Second Division is actually the third tier and not fully pro. I'm no expert on US college sports, but I don't see how he passes that guideline either. And the media coverage in the article isn't enough in my opinion to pass the |general notability guideline.Incidentally, the insistent wall of text hyping minor accomplishments doesn't half remind me of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Older (2nd nomination)|the Jordan Older AfD. cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BIO)

Comment: we've seen this countless times before. He doesn't pass GNG, he hasn't done anything of note in the world of football and he doesn't pass  either. This is a promotional article (IMO) with no merit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)