Deletion of Mishk'vei ishah

Comment: too many problems as expressed by many editors, and especially violating 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as this appears to have unresolvable problems with |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: previously merged content into a much stronger, |well-referenced artcile.  |Notable because it is the subject of much controversy.  Wikipedia is not just a place for nice things, but |for controversial topics that may upset some.  For our core readers - students - this is a useful article. fD is not the place to discuss |moves or |mergers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:A||WP:RM||WP:PM)

Comment: Irredeemable 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: and restore content to the original articles) per nominator. This is a violation of . This article resulted from a ghastly "merging" of content from two fairly acceptable and conventional articles Leviticus 18 and The Bible and homosexuality#Leviticus 18 and 20 that did NOT dwell on a particularly Judaic point of view, but of a more general one. Then all of a sudden from within those more or less conventional-sounding and seeming articles, there was then born this misbegotten "Mishk'vei ishah" mumbo-jumbo as a Hebraicly-named and "sounding" aberration that has absolutely no real connection to any clearly defined classical Judaic, Hebraic legacy or Christian intrepretation. It is one thing to describe and explain what a term has meant in Hebrew over the ages, it quiet another to abscond with a term and then use it as a tool to reflect modern day attitudes, debates and struggles over the meaning and scope of homosexuality, defending the move in  style. Therefore, this article fails in its own goals, and its creator has not done it any favors by disembowling it from its original contexts of either the ''entire'' Biblical chapters, actually two verses: {{bibleverse||Leviticus|18:22|HE}} and {{bibleverse||Leviticus|20:13|HE}}, from which it stems or within the context of an entire article about the The Bible and homosexuality, but not to grab a sliver of a phrase out of context hackneyed to death with incomprehensible gobbledygook that is neither Christian nor Jewish, that verges quite seriously in violation of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:LAWYER||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: In part per DGG, in part as the article has what appears to be about 5-10 quality 3rd party references (uncontested) on the topic, and because 5-secs on Gbooks and Gsholar returns 3-4 works where the topic is discussed in-depth -- implying that this article is a clear pass for . .  A search for "Leviticus 18:22" returns a truckload of scholary references, supporting that the topic passes inclusion criteria.  I cannot comment if the articles has issues, only that a stand-alone is fully warranted.  In this context OR, SYNTH, ESSAY and other deletion rationales are irrelevant, as AfD is not for clean-up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)