Deletion of Nokia 7250 (2nd nomination)

Comment: per .  The topic is actually quite notable: {{find|Nokia 7250}}, even having scholarly references such as "the Nokia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a directory of everything that exists including every product offered for sale by a notable company. Not every cell phone model needs its own Wikipedia article when it failed to gain |notability demonstrated by  substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. It is adequately covered at  List of Nokia products. Just remove the brackets around it there and it won't be a  Wikipedia:Red link|redlink
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: The reason offered in this AfD is , not OEFFORT. There are hits in search engines, but that doesn't mean that the references are substantial or reliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOEFFORT)