Deletion of Bajaj Institute of Technology Wardha

Comment: Lacking , failing . --Gpkp&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NSCHOOL)

Comment: Fails , and fails criteria 3 of  because the article fails . Editors who haven't read SCHOOLOUTCOMES in awhile, will be surprised to see that the language of that policy changed after an RFC in 2017
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:ORG)

Comment: It's a school.  Not every school deserves a Wikipedia page, and there is nothing notable about this one.  See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL)

Comment: doesn't pass Wikipedia:Notability|WP:SIGCOV and . - 𓋹 𝓩𝓲𝓪𝓭 𝓡𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭 𓋹
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL)

Comment: I have added few more sources that I found online. I remember reading about this institute several times in newspapers.  says we should consider the fact that offline news may exist before proposing for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: prior consensus and the guidelines are pretty clear that private schools have to follow the same notability guidelines as any other type of organization and therefore do not get a special pass from things like . Which, as a private organization, this college clearly fails. Otherwise, the people who think the article should be kept are free to provide  usable, in-depth, independent sources and I will be happy to change my vote to keep. In the meantime though, I haven't found any and no one has bothered to provide them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:THREE)

Comment: WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES states educational institutes have to pass either |general notability criteria, or |notability guidelines for organisations. The subject fails both. All the sources provided, including recently, are listings/yellow pages/press releases. They do not establish notability. The keep arguement above states that ''SCHOOLOUTCOMES says we should consider the fact that offline news may exist before proposing for deletion.'' Actually, SCHOOLOUTCOMES states {{tq|References to demonstrate notability may be offline, and this must be taken into consideration before bringing a page to AFD.}} It talks about references like books, journals, and similar stuff. Even if we include news, according to the article, {{tq|the college afer getting approvals from AICTE in 2017-18, academic sessions were started.}} Even if it was covered in news, it wouldnt be difficult to find these news online. SCHOOLOUTCOMES also says we should avoid bringing up SCHOOLOUTCOMES during AfD. —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG)