Deletion of Misao Okawa

Comment: Obviously. Nominator has proposed a number of articles be deleted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ethel_Lang_(supercentenarian) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sakari_Momoi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kathleen_Snavely https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Goldie_Steinberg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gertrude_Weaver https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orma_Slack), including well sourced articles that clearly pass , for no reason other than " just don't like it|I just don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:I)

Comment: Obviously notable person with significant sources and coverage to easily pass ,  and  (and I didn't even have to dig). The nominator of this ticket cited  as the main reason for listing this article for . There are no directories in this article whatsoever
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BASIC||WP:NOTDIR||WP:AFD)

Comment: Being the world's oldest person ''in and of itself'' does not confer notability per any policy, but the extent of coverage in this case seems to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: As discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koto Okubo (2nd nomination), simply being the oldest woman at one time was not sufficient for notability (also this isn't the Academy Awards, these "winners" are based solely on various sources alleging that she actually was the oldest woman alive at that time) because as discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Taggart (2nd nomination), obituary sources which they all are better to be considered  coverage that would be expected rather than examples of notability as required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:N)