Deletion of Sham Idress

Comment: per nom. The sources listed above by Ngrewal1 are not in-depth and do not rise to the level of significance required by . Likewise does not meet any of the criteria at  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NMUSIC||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: lacks in-depth coverage to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)

Comment: as per above comments, seems to pass  and . But the formatting on the references needs to be improved. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom. Fails  and lacks |independent reliable sources. Also this has been deleted before via rticles_for_deletion/Sham_Idrees_(2nd_nomination)|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sham Idrees (2nd nomination) so I think this discussion should be updated as '''3rd nomination''' since the page name was already updated. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:IS||WP:A)

Comment: and '''Move''' to '''Sham Idrees''' (''corrected spelling of his name''), As sham idrees clearly comply with  and meet with . Visit following links to look at significant coverage from National Newspapers & TV channels of Pakistan
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)