Deletion of Richard L. Thompson

Comment: The individual does not pass  as he is not '''the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.''' Also, the individual clearly does not pass  - please provide evidence of this. This has been shown in the discussion above to be untrue. Where are the reliable sources that back up your claims? Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: does not pass either  or . If there are independent secondary sources that significantly discuss either Thompson or his works, I have not been able to find them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: in spite of recent attempts to pad the article with numerous trivial mentions, the subject still fails, , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SCHOLAR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The article has been rewritten and expanded. There's a lot more material on this person and his work. It means that in the future the article can be expanded further. The subject of the article clearly passes , particularly . According to intelectually independent RS he's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)