Deletion of Triangle K

Comment: At the time I put the article up for AfD, the controversial information was most of the article. "Stubbify" would have been a reasonable outcome and I could have done it myself, but I wanted to see if there were |reliable sources on the controversy that perhaps I hadn't been able to find. Since the article has now been stubbified, perhaps we should give the AfD a few more days to see if people returning from holiday can dig up some sources. Otherwise, I'd be happy with this outcome as it is. I'm aware of rumors about the organization, and I was hoping we could find sources that would put these rumors to rest one way or the other. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: in current form. I think that it is reasonable to use the web sites of major corporations who use the service (e.g. http://www.hebrewnational.com/pages/kosher/trianglek_more_details.jsp, http://www.fritolay.com/fl/flstore/cgi-bin/ProdDetEv_Cat_351852_NavRoot_361689_ProdID_359895.htm, and http://www.oreida.com/quicktipsfaqs/kosher.aspx) as third-party |reliable sources. However, the controversy stuff must not be reinserted until valid sources can be found. Blog posts and message board threads won't cut it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)