Deletion of Rachel Parent (2nd nomination)

Comment: In my nomination for deletion I mentioned .  I am very interested to hear what other editors thing about it; can someone address that part of the nomination please?  This is what I think about that issue...  An overwhelming majority of the sources mention Parent for her appearance on the Lang Exchange and not much else about her.  Many of those sources are not independent , but anti GMO publications and websites that have copied their article from elsewhere, without coverage from those sources there would be very little at all.  Much of the coverage of the Lang Exchange mentions more about what was said ''to'' her than anything that was said ''by'' her
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:RS)

Comment: She seems to have sufficient media coverage to meet . In fact O'Leary stated "You’re young, you’re articulate, you’re getting lots of media" in a CBC interview. So there you are, "lots of media" equals notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)

Comment: Continues to meet  per a review of |available online sources. Concerns with promotional tone can be addressed by copy editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)