Deletion of Meydan Tower

Comment: While there are not many sources, I easily found some reliable sources: http://www.meed.com/sectors/construction/dubai-contracting-to-build-meydan-tower/657870.article Meed.com is a well respected Middle East business magazine, and http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&upload_id=11706 worldarchitecturenews.com seems to be reliable too.  The fact it is ''only'' approved and may never be built should not be a measure of its worthiness for inclusion - Wikipedia has plenty of articles about :Template:Supertall proposed skyscrapers|proposed and vision buildings and even buildings that were never built - eg: The Illinois, Volkshalle.  (I know this sounds like the  argument, but I believe it is relevant in this discussion.  The nominator starts their notability argument by saying the building is "...probably not going to be built..." which should not be a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Why is this building notable again?  Seems to be |crystalballing to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)