Deletion of Magee v. McDonald's

Comment: to McDonald's legal cases#Discrimination|McDonald's legal cases § Discrimination for the time being, where the information is duplicated at. However, no prejudice against recreation if the content in the redirect target were to be significantly expanded, warranting a split per  criteria #2
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: I think  applies, given that the lawsuit has not yet resolved... that said, on the other hand, redirects are , and this is so short of a stub that merging it into McDonald%27s_legal_cases#Discrimination will be super easy.  If this becomes more important in the future, it can be recreated with the additional details that become available, but we shouldn't have an independant article created until then
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CHEAP)

Comment: Keep, as this lawsuit is likely to have implications for how drive thru windows at restaurants operate in the future, even if only for newly constructed restaurants and not for those already built.  If this article cannot be kept, it should be merged per  with history in tact to McDonald%27s_legal_cases#Discrimination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)