Deletion of Moondance magazine

Comment: Don't think 'speedy as recreation' applies, since it was speedied before, not AfDed, but sources look slim, and it seems a fairly obvious ad (written in first-person, soliciting submissions, the usual) and might be speediable on those grounds.  Biggest claim to fame seems to be an honorable mention (for which I note a quote is presented and not sourced).  Can't see how this could meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This looks like something that should be notable, because of the UNESCO honorable mention and the fact that a few university departments link to the magazine, but I'm not sure how we're supposed to write a |verifiable article without |reliable, independent sources that have more than one line about this organization.  The result is the article is based solely on the organization's website, and that isn't encyclopediadic.  I mean, for all the Gender Studies departments listed that are linking to this page, no one has written anything about this??  Find one or two, and the case for keeping this gets stronger
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)