Deletion of Michael Brooks (political commentator)

Comment: His recent death has been reported on by various  sources. Also, I love how far Wikipedians go to discredit and defame independent political voices, even in death
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Article has been significantly improved since nom and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As I explained on the proposer's talk page, there is now significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources per , which was determined not to be the case in the previous AfD. I have easily found three sources so far (https://www.foxnews.com/media/michael-brooks-political-progressive-death Fox News, https://www.jacobinmag.com/2020/07/remembering-our-friend-and-comrade-michael-brooks Jacobin Magazine, https://heavy.com/news/2020/07/michael-brooks-dead/ Heavy.com), with more likely to be published in the coming hours and days. I hope that the proposer reconsiders this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Many sources about him (that are not about his death) are more recent than the last AfD which was in 2018. I agree that a few of the statements currently being put into the article are not discussed in high quality sources but there is more than enough for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Brooks is notable, not just for his death, but for his entire career as a political commentator and journalist as the articles cited above mention. Brooks also meets the criteria for  (1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.). Currently Michael Brooks is the top trending mention on twitter with over 45.8k unique mentions. His body of work is being cited by journalists, world leaders, politicians, and entertainers as having a significant and unique importance in his field of progressive journalism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)