Deletion of Rakudo Perl 6

Comment: There is no requirement in either verifiability  or reliable sources  policies for sources to be "non-specialist". The criterion for notability merely requires multiple, in-depth reliable sources independent of the Rakudo's creators and major contributors. The Linux today article and O'Reilly interview cited in the article qualify as independent RS. In particular, O'Reilly publishes book on many computer topics, but none on Rakudo that I know of, so independence in the sense of no financial conflict of interest is satisfied here. There are also an http://sdt.bz/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=33566&page=1 SD Times article and an http://www.i-programmer.info/programming/perl/6138-where-is-perl-heading-an-interview-with-jonathan-worthington.html interview with one of the Rakudo architects. These four sources are enough to pass  notability guidelines. The article itself could use better sourcing, but has no insurmountable issues, per . A notable topic and surmountable problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)