Deletion of CreationWiki

Comment: We shouldn't keep articles on non-notable sites that don't meet any of the guildeines at . That deleting an article will "look very bad" is not a reason to keep &ndash; we're here to write articles with encyclopedic merit, not to appease every point of view that comes through here. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails  miserably.  The reason we want multiple independent sources to write aobut something, is we need those sources, to have in-depth neutral article.  This page can't say anything meaningful.  It can just repeat what CreationWiki says, as that's about the only source of information available (obviously a non-neutral source).  Notice please, that the "Criticisms of CreationWiki" section is *entirely* unsourced.  It refers to "Critics of CreationWiki", but doesn't say who those critics are, or where those criticisms were published.  I suggest those "critics" are the very Wikipedian(s) who wrote that section.   This is such a minor web site, that almost no publisher of note, either knows or cares enough to write about this very minor site.  Removing all unsourced stuff, will leave behind, a rather pathetic substub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)