Deletion of Jesse Ruddock

Comment: as . Writers are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they and their writing exist — a writer gets a Wikipedia article when she can be |reliably sourced over  for one or more specific accomplishments. Improved coverage of her may very well come to exist once the book is actually released, but as of right now the sourcing here is entirely too dependent on |primary sources, and media content where she was the bylined ''author'' rather than the ''subject'' of the piece. No prejudice against recreation next year if the coverage kicks in once her novel's out — but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising platform, and nothing written or sourced here already gets her an encyclopedia article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:RS||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: as failing  per nomination as well as failing  for photography. Nothing suggest he has any notability. As far as I can see it's a clear case of . No prejudice for recreation in years to come
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:ARTIST||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as per  (I took a swipe at sourcing it, did a light edit, but it really is TOOSOON.  Apparent .  User:KokoBonaparte would have done better ot wait until after the book comes out.  I do wish to stipulate that if the first novel, scheduled for publication in February 2017, gets, 3 reviews in significant media, and some feature soyr treatment, there should be no prejudice against writing an article at that point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMO)