Deletion of Nintendo On (2nd nomination)

Comment: Non-notable hoax. Not sure it created the splash it claims to have. I can't find any coverage either. (Though its hard to do a search with 2 words that would be so commonly found together.) Fails the  unless someone else can find some better coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as not passing  with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as /RS. I only see the semi-secondary 1UP piece (already in article) and non-in-depth 99lives piece, and nothing more except primary (by video creater) or unreliable pieces (forums and boards). Just to be clear, an article ''about'' a hoax is okay, the argument here is that it doesn't pass GNG or . I don't think any content belongs in Wii or anything Nintendo-related, but may be in a list of (sourced) hoaxes if such were to exist. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:WEB)

Comment: This cute toaster lacks |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) It didn't pass a Wikipedia:Search engine test|search engine test or have meaningful hits in a /RS|video game reliable sources search. The only meaningful coverage was the 2005 1UP feature. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. File:Eye close font awesome.svg|14px|link=user:czar/watching|I am no longer watching this page—whisperback if you'd like a response&nbsp;czar&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:VG)