Deletion of Verdanagate

Comment: and/or '''redirect to IKEA'''.  There seems to be a few examples of coverage in reliable sources, but this is classic slow-news-day news that probably warrants a sentence or two in IKEA at the most - spinning it out into a genuine "controversy" seems to border on original research, I'm not seeing that level of dismay in the reliable sources cited. Serious 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: selectively merge) to Ikea, as called for in the Talk:Verdanagate#Merge proposal|merger proposal on the talk page of the article. The topic deserves mention in the Ikea article. The first choice when a company is in the news, is to add that event to the company's article. There is really not that much that needs to be said about this. There was some reaction to the change from "the typography community" which was noted by some mainstream news sources, but per  this does not require a permanent encyclopedia article on the brief news flurry
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)