Deletion of No User Interface

Comment: per Jimmi Hugh. For those wandering what unencyclopedic means here: this article is an essay that tries to justify a (new?) acronym, so it violates  and . Based on this, I have strong doubts that it's worthy of Wiktionary, so I'm removing that tag
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: Looking at the page history and discussion page, as well as the article itself, it appears to have been created for marketing purposes, raising |conflict of interest and |neutrality issues. It may belong in a pamphlet for businesses about product design, but not Wikipedia. Beyond that, a Google define: search returns no relevant results for both "No User Interface" and "NUI". It is not |notable and the article offers no citations indicating the widespread use of the acronym: indeed, the edit summary from the creation of the article suggests the editor made it up themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NPOV||WP:N)

Comment: While the concept is meritorious, it does not look . There are ''many'' Google hits for NUI as an acronym for "Natural User Interface" and a few for "Network User Interface." Googling the acronym and phrase togetherhttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=NUI+%22No+User+Interface%22 shows some uses of "nui" as a switch for disabling user interaction. (The IEEE and VTT papers are false positives. The latter is a good read on ubiquitous computing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:notable)