Deletion of Richard Miniter

Comment: As Cullen328 points out, notability is not temporary. Miniter has been the subject of multiple articles in a number of reliable sources independent from him, and the available sources are adequate to compose a useful, well-sourced encyclopedia article. Miniter is also the author of multiple books that have landed on the New York Times bestselling non-fiction list, and he is notable enough that a dispute between Miniter, three fellow authors, and their shared publisher was covered by the New York Times. Seems like a  nomination to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: WP:AUTHOR is the relevant guideline to look at to decide whether the article should be kept or not. It's not clear at the moment that there has been enough significant coverage of him to meet , so it really boils down to whether sources can be found to satisfy part of WP:AUTHOR. The closing admin may also like to be aware that IPs have a history off attacking the article, so the nomination may not be in good faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails  and  per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS)