Deletion of The Galapagos Effect

Comment: as a |neologism. Google shows it was used in one newspaper (sited in article) and in one blog
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: So |delete the non-notable one instead of AfD'ing the whole, perhaps
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: My reading of the article is that the term "Galapogos Effect" is being used to identify that the Japanese Cellphoen market is isolated list the Galapogos Islands allowing it to evolve differently from other cell phone markets due to isolation.  A search through google news shows only the one article used as a reference.  The term "Galapogos Effect" also appears to be used in economics, and also separately in biology when searching through Google Book and Google Scholar.  However, the usage there does not match the content of this article.  I say delete as a |neologism.  If the other senses of the phrase are notable, an article can be created for them, but the material from this article is not the basis for any such new article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)