Deletion of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

Comment: Not an article, just an a list, and presentation of it is an extreme violation of NPOV's  weight clause, as it shows a list of alleged scientists, most without real credentials or in unrelated fields, and tries to advance an agenda by spearating it from a list of scientist who support the existence of global warning. It's nothing but a POV fork
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Previously nominated twice Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming|afd1 Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming_(2nd_nomination)|afd2, last time was a  Speedy Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per nom. This is clear  and is of dubious value to the project and dubious encyclopaedic value. Does seem to violate . Should be deleted and a list of the notable proponets added to the parent article or a template, supported by . This also has  issues, etc. Very problematic  "article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:SOAP||WP:RS||WP:CFORK||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Obviously not an advertisement.  Documentation in reliable sources is not a problem.  Scientific dissent among respected scientists is not what  is talking about.  Within the context of the article title, it appears to be NPOV, but even if it weren't, that wouldn't be a reason to delete.  Your reasons for deletion seem to boil down to "I don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)