Deletion of Indiggo (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'd say the charting in Germany is enough to pass . And looking at the sources, quite a few do mention Indiggo just in passing rather than in-depth, but I think there is still enough RS coverage to support  too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: mdash; As the closer of the original AfD, if {{U|Epeefleche}}'s link regarding the charting of the single is |reliable, then I'd see no reason why the artist wouldn't meet  and should therefore be kept.  The main issue on the original AfD was some people saying, effectively, "so totally meets GNG" while others were saying, effectively, "so totally doesn't meet GNG and fails BAND," so it mainly came down to whether the artist met . *shrug* FWIW
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BAND||WP:BAND)

Comment: meets  guidelines. Promo editing can be dealt with elsewhere (blocking, semi-p etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Not only does it meet GNG (I've just added some more refs, including an article in ''Spiegel Online'', and there are more out there if you want to read them), but it meets our music notability criteria of  as it had http://swisscharts.com/song/Indiggo/Be-My-Boyfriend-179796 a single that charted in Germany
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: They do not meet  nor do they meet , this article has had a huge self promotion issue in the past with many socks adding content that claims notability but is clearly not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND)