Deletion of Death from a Distance and the Birth of a Humane Universe

Comment: I would strongly recommend that the "Do not delete" !voters should review Wikipedia's standards for |notability, particularly those for |books. The article we are discussing is about the book ''itself'', but the arguments and references being given seem to relate to the subject matter that the book ''discusses''. Maybe there is an article that should be written on that subject matter (Human uniqueness question perhaps?), or there might be a place to use this book as a source for some existing article. But a separate article just about the book cannot be justified if there are no |reliable sources (which does not include promotion quotes provided by the publisher) discussing ''the book itself''. It is clear that articles written years before the book could not be discussing the book itself as a subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BK||WP:RS)

Comment: Brand new book, so no historical significance or influence. No citations in the article to indicate notability, and searching produced no indication of reviews or other coverage from any reliable source. Even the book's own website doesn't mention anything that would satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)