Deletion of Lync Aronson

Comment: No substantial independent coverage. As an article for an academic, fails . As an article for an aspiring politician... being an unsuccessful candidate for a position on a student union is about, or below, the level of being an unsuccessful candidate for a position on a city council: a level at which even successful candidates are generally not notable enough for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Not widely known here in Dunedin - known to a section of the University's student population, but that is hardly enough to justify an article. "lync aronson" -wikipedia -facebook returns a massive 7 ghits (by way of comparison, a similar search for my name returns 23000 ghits, and I also appear every now and again on nationwide television. I doubt I'd be worthy of an article). I'm also somewhat concerned by the number of accounts which have been created simply to join in this AfD discussion. I would advise those new wikipedians to look at , which will show clearly how far below notability this subject falls. In years to come, he may become famous enough for an article, but he certainly isn't yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Per nom, all the keep votes seem to be here through a sort of canvassing off-site and should be aware that it is not the number of votes that determine the outcome but the strength of the arguments based on Wikipedia policies. By this continued pile on without valid arguments besides |I like him you only make everything more suspect. If you can provide |reliable sources to help indicate his notability then do so otherwise you are not helping the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:RS)