Deletion of Matilde Vernet y Sáez

Comment: Yes, there are: https://ar.noticias.yahoo.com/la-primera-malvina-argentina.htmlhttp://contintanorte.com.ar/2012/04/09/a-30-anos-del-conflicto-del-atlantico-sur%E2%80%A6-un-poco-de-historia-los-vernet-una-familia-entre-malvinas-y-un-san-isidro-que-supo-mitigar-el-destierro/http://blogs.lanacion.com.ar/historia-argentina/familias/malvina-vernet/. They may not be entire volumes about her, but are enough confirm notability. As to the sharp remark, I'll share with you my personal situation: I can't afford to devote ''hours'' to this (remember, I'm not a native speaker, plus ''British warriors'' here will make it a hard task) only to see it vanished in an instant, victim of . In any case, I commit myself to do so when this ends. But from your vote and the one above, I can see where this is heading: it's been '''16 days''' since its nomination, and it's clear to me that the reason why this was left to live that much is because a final negative vote was lacking. This will soon be closed by a sympathetic admin
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMICBIAS)

Comment: As OneEuropeanHeart noted above, the reason ''why'' a person is notable is not a valid argument for deletion (i.e. the reason being allegedly false). I quote from :  ''"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)