Deletion of International PEN (2nd nomination)

Comment: As the person "playing silly games" with the process and closing the article per  originally I would to take the time here to say that this renomination is invalid, I have '''http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9059037/International-PEN clearly''' showed that this organisation is notable, sources can be found and I have added some already - This is why I closed the AfD - this article has ''a snowball's chance in hell'' of being deleted. can someone else please SNOW Close this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: If it is such a clear case, then it will be eminently suitable for  once a reasonable time for discussion has elapsed. 45 minute and 3 comments is not a reasonable time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)