Deletion of Phoenix Global Intelligence Systems

Comment: Notability is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: If this article is deleted, then '''7Seas''' will also need to be deleted under #G8
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Rossmiller explains she did not share anything with the group in this Wired article: http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/15-11/ff_rossmiller.   And the group notability comes only by it's association with her.  Agree with Amatulic.  Notability .  Even the founder, Brent Astley doesn't have a wikipedia article.  That's how not-notable it is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: The Michelle Obama thing was a just a bit of hyperbole to point out that inherited notability can still meet the .  I have provided multiple sources that contain significant coverage about the group.  Which part of the  do you feel has not been addressed by the provided sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per nom. Besides, articles is a thinly disguised |advertisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: The group may have become more noticed because of the actions of Rossmiller, but there is coverage about the group that goes beyond .  I made an error in the cutting and pasting and linked to the wrong item above for the Seattle Times, and have corrected the link.  I've also linked above to an ABC article that covers them as the primary topic.  The http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Mother-of-3-is-a-judge-by-day-spy-by-night-1504945.php Houston Chronicle also covers this group.  The fact that the founder doesn't have an article is irrelevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: And Michelle Obama is only notable because she is the wife of Barrack Obama.   does not automatically mean that the related subject cannot be notable itself.  The sources I have presented satisfy  in that they are reliable sources (major media), and the coverage is significant (beyond just a passing mention).  When something satisifies our inclusion criteria, then it should be included
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:GNG)