Deletion of Remittance to India

Comment: This doesn't need an article of its own as the topic itself hasn't been talked about in third-party sources. Basing it off on one news story violates #NEWS as encyclopedia articles should be general topics in themselves and not specific details based off of one news report
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: rewritten informative sourced article. It's |closing time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: can be rescued easily - see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: as Uncle G has it correct. This is not the same as earlier deleted articles. Any current concerns can easily be met with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: The subject is clearly notable; it's an economic phenomenon that accounts for 3% of India's GDP.  There's plenty of |reliable source coverage available to satisfy |the general notability guideline.  The subject is deep enough that people could (presumably do) make their careers studying it, so I don't think  or  are serious concerns here.  The outstanding question is where to cover the topic.  People have suggested merging to remittance: why not merge to Economy of India?  It has at least as good a claim to the subject, and the subject could be developed there in much greater depth without overbalancing the article.  The fact that multiple unrelated subjects have deep claims on this topic indicates that it should be merged into none of them, and remain a separate article instead.  Keeping the subject independent gives it more breathing space/room to grow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:DICDEF||WP:NOTDIR)