Deletion of Infoshop.org

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The comments above -- particularly K50 Dude's -- satisfy the  requirements. Also, when there is a concern about notability, the appropriate first response is a notability tag, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This is a no brainer. The article easily meets . I think its pretty clear that bias has played a part in the nomination of the Infoshop article as a candidate for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Like ''Indymedia'', this is a unique news source we ought to cover, and it covers a lot of protest-related activities that the mainstream media doesn't.  Because it is a news outlet, I'm not sure that  is the most appropriate guideline to work with, but  is only an essay.  It has one independent secondary source; finding a second one should settle this debate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NME)