Deletion of List of current ISKCON sannyasis

Comment: Disclosure: I am primary author.  Topic is notable in itself as it is significant and interesting, both in general and within the assigned category. Blue names are all notable. Red names:  all are notable within Category:International Society for Krishna Consciousness. I think this article falls under #Incomplete_lists and that is why I have tagged it for Expand list. I think the red names are safe to include per  - one would expect to see all these names on this list, each member is verifiably a member of the listed group (can add sources given some time) and it is reasonable to expect an article should be forthcoming in the future. Notability of all names cannot be compared to a list of cardinals or catholic priests as English Wikipedia would naturally contain more data on Catholic cardinals than on Vaishnav sannyasis, and Wikipedia recognises its need to expand Hindu Vaishnav content /V.  primary source may be used to support content in the article but does not contribute towards proving the notability of the subject and also it may be used to only make descriptive claims i.e. the names in the list. No analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims have been made about information found in a primary source. Not a fork as List of ISKCON members and patrons includes non-sannyasis and past sannyasis, its purpose is different and it is not a duplicate. Reference to blog removed. Also compare List of Ayatollahs with List of Grand Ayatollahs - there is significant overlap yet both articles are valid as the List of Ayatollahs contains non-Grand Ayatollahs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:SALAT||WP:WPLIST||WP:LSC||WP:HINDU||WP:PSTS)

Comment: No logical argument should be ignored.  can be used effectively to assess precedence and consistency. Comparison to other lists of religious leaders provides an important insight into the general notability of the concept. There is precedence in usage of the inclusion of names in various finite lists of religious leaders in order to make Wikipedia comprehensive; it serves no useful purpose to endlessly argue over the notability of a minority of these items. Most of the leaders are notable within the category of ISKCON, yet many do not have articles due to #Biographies - this is one reason why /V was created
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE||WP:BIAS||WP:HINDU)