Deletion of This Vital Chapter

Comment: per Moondyne. Most arguments on this page are for the notability of the *band*, which is not in dispute, but not for the notability of *this album*. Critical fact - the album has not been a success in any market - no charting positions. One component song's low placing on the Triple J Hottest 100, a statistically unsound survey which does not release its figures or methodology and is based on phone-in and web votes which are easy to stack for low-placed entries, does not accord it notability of any kind. What is here is sufficient to be merged into the Panda Band article however (hence I disagree with the nom that there is "quite literally nothing to merge"). The external links may also need revising as few or none meet Wikipedia's policy on |external links
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:EL)

Comment: The Band is notable for having won awards in their field. This gives their album some notability per , especially independent coverage has been found such ashttp://www.fasterlouder.com.au/news/aust/5722
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)