Deletion of Christian Spielmann

Comment: per stellar citation record. A complete failure of  by the nom. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.29.9|101.119.29.9
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: As per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Meets #1, stellar citation data (over 11,000 citations and an h-index of 48). Award is indeed not notable, but who cares with this kind of citation evidence. Given his standing, finding more sources should be possible and expansion of this too-small stub is highly desirable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: While I do think that the article should be '''kept''', I think there is a certain amount of abuse of citation numbers going on in this discussion (and in the article as well), and the case for trouting does not seem so strong to me.  In experimental physics, it is not unusual for hundreds of individuals to coauthor the same paper.  In the first pages of results on Google scholar, he is not the primary author.  Even so, he clearly does hold a respectable h-index even as a primary author, so I would grant him a pass under criterion 1 of .  (However, I would remove the statement from the article about his Google scholar citation number as grossly misleading .  Search index results are not usually thought of as reliable sources for this very reason.)  I agree that the awards are not significant enough to qualify as fulfilling criterion 2
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:OR)