Deletion of Public houses and restaurants in Montevideo

Comment: given the recent instability, and ongoing uncertainty, over what this article's topic/title is, it may be appropriate to  it until its main author (and serial renamer) can come up with a non-transient title, and rewrite/prune the material to fit the title, at which point its notability can be determined with something ''at least vaguely resembling'' a degree of certainty. Until that happens everybody involved in this ''utter mess'' of an AfD (whether in favour of keeping or deleting the article) is hampered by having to aim at a moving target
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY)

Comment: appears to be a tortuously-created (via several tenuously-related titles)  of Uruguayan cuisine and whatever other cuisines happen to be represented by restaurants in Montevideo (Japanese cuisine, Fast food, etc), combined with  restaurant guide information. No non-overlapping notability (nor really a coherent topic -- as it covers several, unrelated, cuisines, rather than any ''single'' cuisine that does not already have an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: as per . this article is simply a listing of what individual restaurants have and types of food available in Montevideo... would it differ greatly from another large Uruguayuan city. so many |arguments to avoid have popped up here such as , ,  none of which add to the case for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:AADD||WP:MERCY||WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:ITSUSEFUL)

Comment: Well, now that the title and scope have changed mid discussion, it's a different matter; an article on the "Cuisine of Montevideo" is certainly reasonable. However, I still think the section on the Shannon Irish Pub has some  issues in the context of the new title.  On the other hand, I think a paragraph is fine within the context of the Irish Uruguayan (minus the infobox, which was excessive for a small subtopic within the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT)