Deletion of Globus Cassus (second nomination)

Comment: I hate to call a previously decided debate into question (''starie decisis''), however this case seems to be extraordinary.  There is no real |notability asserted, the article is |unreferenced and seems to be |unattributed |original research.  Let's keep this one from becoming an  discussion, or a forum to discuss the subject of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:ATT||WP:OR||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: The "keep" votes have thus far failed to address the issue at stake in this deletion debate: the almost total lack of coverage of the subject in reliable, third party sources. None of them have provided any solid evidence or references to back up their assertions and some of them are falling back on . This discussion needs to either (a) cite additional references and sources or else (b) demonstrate non-trivial influence in an area where only a tiny number of sources can reasonably be expected, stating what that area is and why it is reasonable that third party references should be so thin on the ground. So far the only convincing "keep" argument has been from Dhartung, with some useful information about the Biennale, but even then the lack of coverage elsewhere leaves some questions unanswered: if what he is saying is correct, it would be roughly analogous to an Olympic swimmer winning a gold medal and getting little or no press coverage in her home country
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Since submitting this second AfD, I have taken a closer look at the first one, and to be honest, it is a joke. Not one contributor referenced any Wikipedia policies, nor did anyone provide any references or sources establishing the notability of the concept ''in its own right''. The entire argument boiled down to  versus . This article requires multiple, non-trivial references to demonstrate its enduring notability, and these are unfortunately seriously lacking
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)