Deletion of Adam Bayliss

Comment: Kevin, I didn't explain myself well enough.  I was looking through the list of pages tagged as problematic for notability and found this guy, and there were two other tags also, and I figured it was a lost cause, so I sent it here.  I could have written in my nomination "nonnotable, fails  but I got bored.  Anyway, I acknowledge that the article has been improved significantly.  (By the way, I have been making sporadic contributions to Wikipedia, sometimes as an IP address, for more than a year
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Despite the poor reason given for nomination the article fails , so he worked in the art department, doesn't mean he deserves an article. Making his own short films doesn't show notability either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Sourced marginally well but he still fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I don't know that he strictly meets the  guideline as the primary subject of multiple articles, but this is now a well written and well sourced article.  There are enough verified minor claims to notability to jointly justify the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: no news articles to be found in with google news or the EBSCOHost system which shows he has not even attracted local news interest. Looks like a good film producer but has not made enough of an impact in the world to have |verifyability from |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)