Deletion of Kish Mauve (EP)

Comment: to Kish Mauve. Maybe it's notable, but the more important point is that it is unlikely to ever be sourced well enough to expand beyond permastub status. So, per , redirect to the band's article, preserving the history so that anyone can merge anything useful to the band page without further AfD involvement
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: No single material RS on this album; any RS I could find was about the band and their songs and not this album per se https://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/aug/26/kish.mauve.  Spreading the actions of a borderline  band over several WP articles (e.g. there is a Template Box at the bottom of a series of Kish Mauve articles) is the wrong approach.  Have one central article on the band and anything that is struggling with GNG (e.g. songs or albums) should be added/merged to that article to consolidate references. In a decade's time, these articles are going to get deleted as their thin/weak sources drop away and interest wanes, so consolidation will help preservation of the band
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: See this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kish_Mauve_(EP)&oldid=880876369 in which Subtropical-man accused me of trolling and then deleted it. He has also accused PC78 of trolling, which is still visible above. Neither of us actually voted to keep the article yet, and mere comments have been subjected to baseless accusations of foul play. The nominator is engaged in |uncivil behavior and is also |bludgeoning the process
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: In the argument above, PC78 made valid calls for proper deletion arguments, which the nominator countered with accusations rather than reasoned responses. The following are NOT reasons to delete: being a stub, having been created by a non-active user, having too few references (see ), being an EP (which by the way IS a studio album, just a short one). The nominator seems unfamiliar with the finer points of , which do not support deleting the article for any of the reasons given. The article surely needs some cleanup and expansion, but this deletion nomination should be withdrawn as unsupportable and possibly uncivil
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: since subject fails  and there is little to discuss beyond that, aside from arguments that are variants of . There are simply no sources |verifying |notability. Nothing can be merged, as has been with obvious kindness suggested, either, because unsourced material is not moved elsewhere but deleted outright
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:V||WP:N)