Deletion of Fonus

Comment: Meets , plenty of coverage exists and in-depth as well such as https://trustednerd.com/2020/06/28/review-fonus-unlimited-data-calling-and-texting-its-really-good/ this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've looked at the sources presented and searched myself and the sources are the usual bag of company announcements, interviews/quotes and mentions in passing, none meet  requirements. Company is run-of-the-mill, no indications of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Passes  with several good Canadian and international sources. More paragraphs also could be easily forked from Simon Tian
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the sources added and cited by the author are secondary sources, independent (some are even highly critical of the company), and significant; as per  and  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/185.69.145.0|185.69.145.0
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: As per nom. Peter, that link is a hyperbolic "advertorial" which is hardly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The appropriate SNG for corporations is WP:NCORP which places a higher standard of scrutiny on sources used to establish notability. Quoting the GNG, which has a less strict standard, does not mean the references meet the appropriate standard. The latest reference posted by Peter303x below is from a one-person website/blog which accepts commissions for "reviewing" products and services. Fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)