Deletion of 2011 Michigan vs. Notre Dame football game

Comment: Wondering where the AFD stands. I commend TheWorm77 for finding sources for the article, but I still believe with sources, the article violates Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Individual_games_or_series and is |routine. Consider that the sources that are being used are routine coverage. While they are continuing coverage in a sense, they are all routine "end of the year" of "best of 2011" articles. Sportswriters write these articles on a yearly basis to recap the season. Moreover, none of these articles rate the game as the most important game of the year and are trivial recaps of the game. One article used cites the game as the 36th best game of the year... not exactly important. None of the sources point to the game as important in a historical context. There is no coverage that reaches "game of the century" discussion or that discusses the impact of the game on the sport
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: ec}} - Does anyone else feel all Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wide left|Déjà vu-y? Same content type, same arguments, and what I think should be the same result. Dirtlawyer outlines this very well: the game, although 'notable', has nothing more then routine coverage and so fails . User:Davidfreesefan23: a dramatic ending doesn't mean much, in today's sports world (see the Wide left example). Now, if we had an article written after the fact about the "symbolic rebirth of a storied program that had recently fallen on hard times" this discussion might be different...but that is OR-ish and irrelevant right now. The content can obviously go into the related season articles, but a separate article isn't needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: Fails .  Willing to reconsider if supporters to keep can provide sources that demonstrate continued coverage alluding to significance of first night game at Michigan Stadium.  If that shown to be the claim to fame, details of the actual game have  weight as currently written
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Michigan Stadium already mentioned the first night game taking place, and 2011_Michigan_Wolverines_football_team#vs._Notre_Dame has details of the actual game. Information is already d in the event the article is deleted.  I don't believe it needs a redirect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: All those saying ''Keep - meets '' are ignoring the '''policy''' of  (or rather the subsection of NEWSPAPER), the relent notability guidelines here (other than NEWSPAPER) are either  or , there is a requirement that coverage of an event continue '''beyond a relatively short news cycle''' that is not the case here so it therefor falls neatly into what  NEWSPAPER envisages when it says ''most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:EVENT||WP:SPORTSEVENT)