Deletion of Crusher (website)

Comment: This is not notable at all. Yes, it existed at some point of time and got a few reviews when it started (http://www.wired.com/2007/12/monetize/,http://www.popsugar.com/tech/Website-Day-Crusher-438115#photo-438115). But the depth of coverage is seriously lacking (fails ). Being a competitor to a possibly notable service, doesn't mean the subject is notable. The website started in Aug 2006, launched in May 2007 and closed in 2008. From what it appears, it was not notable enough or was not widely used. We simply do not need an article about this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: A  article whose history also included substantial editing from an account whose name is similar to the company founder. Brief reviews can be found from the time of the start-up, often relative to competing products of the time, as is typical / necessary for new product propositions, but I am seeing nothing to indicate notability either for the product or the company. I agree with a previous Prod notice, which was removed without comment, and see no real notability: fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (:WP:SPA||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)