Deletion of Deepak Rawat

Comment: Bonadea summed it up nicely - this person simply doesn't meet the . I was also unable to find non-trivial coverage in reliable, independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Run-of-the-mill civil servant who does not meet  as there is no significant coverage of him in multiple reliable and independent sources.  concerns notability of politicians, not civil servants, and in any case there is no in-depth press coverage.   {{yo|Aj Ajay Mehta 007}}  Please read  and stop posting walls of text in response to every other participant here. You should assume that editors who take the time to post their assessment here have done their due diligence by reading the earlier discussion as well as the article itself, and by checking the sources therein. Your repeated requests for answers is |disruptive behaviour, and you https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&diff=1019912027&oldid=1019889313 seem to think that the fact that other editors don't choose to enter into discussion with you means that you are right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NPOL||WP:BLUDGEON||WP:DE)

Comment: as I see it, this passes – " A politician (Beaurocrat) who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles,like in this ({{cite news|url=https://www.aajtak.in/education/photo/ias-officer-deepak-rawat-ex-dm-haridwar-profile-how-clear-upsc-interview-tedu-1027326-2020-02-18|title=Aaj tak news about IAS Deepak Rawat}}) by journalists." There's two features from different publications. The article's got many secondary sources so far
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: the subject lacks 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)