Deletion of Lustboy

Comment: Not one scrap of proof has been proffered suggesting that the subject can meet the GNG.  I did read the ESPN source Timothyjosephwood posted above, and I can't imagine how he thinks that supports notability.  First off, the only mention of the subject is in quotes ''from'' him, which explicitly can't be used to support the notability ''of'' him.  Secondly, that's routine, casual coverage of the sort explicitly debarred by .  Would anyone like to proffer multiple reliable, independent sources that provide "significant coverage" ''to the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: per Timothyjosephwood's fine addition of sourcing to the article - although I would point out that the original stub was quite a young article and it too had sources, if far fewer.  Yes, the sourcing is to largely to websites / e-zines that cover eSports, but the same is true of vanilla sports players being largely covered only in sports sources.   is basically "do 3rd party reliable sources exist", and yes, they do.  If expanded to some 1st-party sources, I imagine the sourcing well gets even deeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: borderline, but I believe TJW has introduced enough sources to show that the subject has |significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems to fit notability and have adequate sources per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources present do not indicate meeting the  through significant coverage through reliable sources. Emphasis on the "''significant coverage''" part - the ESPN source is a very short article that contains even less information about the subject himself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've checked out the rewritten article and my opinion personally hasn't changed. I don't believe there's such a thing as "auto-notability" for eSports by means of playing for a team, because the sport isn't major enough at this time, making  a bad analogy in my view. All of my other views have been detailed previously, and in spite of the additional sources those still stand. A couple of source comments: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/a-dynasty-of-ice-and-fire-part-1-origins/1100-6438119/ This Gamespot one gives him a passing mention in a list in an article about somebody else, https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:LRG__wvbdbIJ:https://www.yahoo.com/news/riot-games-fines-team-solomid-222500173.html%3Fref%3Dgs+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us this mostly consists of an aggregation of Reddit quotes, http://www.espn.co.uk/esports/story/_/id/14577299/north-american-lcs-offseason-report-cards-esports this ESPN one does not load at all and http://www.espn.co.uk/esports/story/_/id/14765498/bjergsen-evolution-team-solomid-league-legends this one gives him the most trivial of mentions in an article about the team. So while they may not be unreliable sources per se, the coverage isn't substantial or often even primarily about Lustboy. And also, many of the sources in general do more to demonstrate the relevance of the teams, as the coverage of him ''personally'' is trivial. I know you won't agree with me but that's very much a part of AFD debates
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)