Deletion of Stimulation

Comment: There is no evidence that the nominator followed , in which case they would have seen that this is an abundantly notable topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: not sure why nominator and others state that this article is unsourced (or "with not a shred of academic support"), the following reference (or it could be further reading?) has been at the bottom of the article since december 2015 (i have just placed it into a "References" section): D.A.Booth, O.Sharpe, R.P.J.Freeman, M.T. Conner (2011) Insight into sight, touch, taste and smell by multiple discrminations from norm. ''Seeing and Perceiving'' 24, 485-511,639, ''Seeing and Perceiving'' (now called ''Multisensory Research'') is an academic journal, see http://www.brill.com/seeing-and-perceiving here, that said agree that article needs cleanup, in itself |not a reason for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)