Deletion of Ink & Dagger

Comment: passes #C1 with ''"subject of multiple non-trivial published works"'' for http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2005/10/28/microsoft-hauled-into-court-in-piracy-case this, http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-16198385_ITM this and http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DN&s_site=philly&p_multi=PI|DN&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10D8111EA3AB5CE8&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM this. Also, 2 of their albums have been reviewed by Allmusic, http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hpfrxqykldhe & http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:h9fixq9jld0e, thus reinforcing MUSIC#C1 more
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Passes  by multiple releases on notable labels (Revelation, Initial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: There is no singular, large point of notability here, but there are enough small ones that, taken together, I feel the band passes  in spirit at least
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: but add infobox. Seems to satisfy  with multiple reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)