Deletion of Dane Rauschenberg (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article makes a rather specific claim of notability per  in terms of his efforts to run a series of 52 marathons over a span of a year, and backs uo that claim of notability with a few dozen reliable and verifiable sources that include major newspapers and magazines, who were covering Rauschenberg and his efforts to achieve his goal. So many articles discussed at AfD make tenuous claims of notability and are kept with the argument that there may well be more sources available. This article far exceeds the standards of retention in Wikipedia in general and goes well beyond nearly all articles kept at AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The subject passes , is |notable, and the coverage is not all "superficial" or local. Source examples include
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:N)