Deletion of Dr. David A. Gremse

Comment: I declined the speedy as it didn't fit #A7 due to (strong) assertions of notability. I'm a bit ambivelant but recent improvements including a cite to what looks like a  that he's in ''Who's Who of America'' would seem that this is not a simple puff piece. I agree with the nominaor that there is a likely  but that, of course, is not a reason of itself to delete. Wether this does meet  is another question but at time of writing it may well do so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:RS||WP:COI||WP:N)

Comment: Not especially notable. I'm in the medical field myself and I find his credentials very run-of-the-mill for an academic doctor. He is on the executive board of a national society, that's good as far as it goes. His writings at Google Scholar are pretty minimal, only two articles that are cited more than 10 times by others. If he's an influential figure in the field, he should have published scores of articles that are widely cited. The "Top Doctors" and such listings are not particularly distinguishing, and I agree with the others here about anyone who brags about being listed in "Who's Who" (which by the way is unverified; the reference given for that listing is to his own faculty web page at the university, in other words, self-referential). All in all he has a long way to go before he meets  or . (BTW I have observed that almost all articles which include "Dr." as part of the article title turn out to be non-notable; Wikipedia style is not to include honorifics in the article title, just the name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO)