Deletion of Mickey's Choo-Choo

Comment: mdash; i added six sources to newly created further reading section, could have added plenty more (thanks, WereSpielChequers!).  this is clearly notable, discussed over many years in many, many contexts.  easily meets gng.  afd is not about whether there's enough in the article to make it an article, it's about whether there's enough in the world to make it an article.  perhaps nominator could look over ? &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: More reliable sources added to article. It appears that the nominator may not have followed the guidelines listed in  for source searching prior to nominating this article for deletion, which, if true, nullifies the basis of nomination for deletion. There's no mention in the nomination regarding the ''availability'' of reliable sources. The nomination's basis is upon content ''within'' the article, rather than upon searching for reliable sources, as required per  requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)