Deletion of National Liberation Movement of Ahwaz

Comment: Wikipedia is not the place to promote '''non-notable fringe''' political advocacy groups, please see |soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: The depth of coverage for the subject needs to be considered. These are the independent secondary sources I found: http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2006/786/re7.htm 1, http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/3EC09F90-D829-4FD9-B4CE-DD5078468EED.htm 2, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=118BCE19E7D29098&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM 3, and http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10E3BA5979057920&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM 4. Source #1 includes an analyst's opinion and comment about the National Liberation Movement of Ahwaz. Source #2 includes a quote from ANLM's chairman, Tahir Aal Sayyed Nima. Source #3 is a short article about the return of Ahwaz TV. Source #4 briefly discusses a statement made by ANLM. In my opinion, I don't think that the coverage of the ANLM by these sources meets . The notability guidelines state that "trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." I think this is the case for the National Liberation Movement of Ahwaz
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)