Deletion of Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber (2nd nomination)

Comment: His notability is obvioushttp://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mohamed+Bin+Issa+Al+Jaber%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=FQk&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=g-7ET8bYFdCFsgKn2ajKCQ&ved=0CC0QpwUoBQ&biw=1680&bih=928, and this is not some private person who shuns coverage--he has his own detailed website with extensive biographical information.http://www.mbialjaber.com/  Deleting this article would be inconsistent with Wikipedia's purposes. If there's contentious material,  has remedies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The policy problems (POV/OR/Sourcing) the nominator points out are all valid, and bias is visible in the article edits. I'm sympathetic to the nomination: at the time of this nom it'd been essentially transformed into an attack page (and hadn't been that good beforehand). It's a little-watched biography and seems to be a target for |SPAs. The quantity of those who want to add negative material is slightly higher than those seeking to remove it, too. However, the subject ''is'' notable. There are steps we can take to handle it better in the future. I've spoken with those adding the problematic material, it's been discussed at the BLP noticeboard and can be taken back there if need be. We can remove problem content, placing {{tl2|BLP removal}} & {{tl2|Controversial}} on the talk page to alert users to the appropriate standards. And we can semi-protect it—long term if necessary, after the article's been cleaned up to be in keeping with content and living persons policies, to provide an additional layer of protection. --Special:Contributions/92.6.202.54|92.6.202.54
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)