Deletion of Paul Block (2nd nomination)

Comment: Does not meet . Google News sources are insufficient to create an article without severe |wikipuffery being involved. Notability is not inherited, and when the thing he is most notable for, PajamasTV, is not itself notable, that says something.  I think MQS is wasting his time if he tries to improve this, but I'll weigh in again with an open mind after he does so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:PUFF)

Comment: per http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1986&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Paul+Block%22%2C+producer&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Paul+Block%22%2C+producer&lnav=od&btnG=Go numerous sources available that could be used to improve the article and both assert and show an industry notability that meets . Its sad that no one's done it, but that |no one has bothered is not a reason to delete if there is a reasonable presumption that improvements |could eventually be done. I might even have a go at it tonight myself so as to lead by example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:DEADLINE)