Deletion of Time Changer

Comment: With the reviews listed above this meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE)

Comment: It definately passes  has accurate references, is start class in legnth, I dont see how this has violated a single guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as  is a poor deletion rationale, |multiple reliable sources are available with |due diligence, and nominator has shown a misunderstanding of the |applicable |notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NF)

Comment: was keep) Plenty of reviews, good-quality article, made money.  Faulty nomination: not specific about which criteria of  were not met. Nom is misreading  in a strangely strict interpretation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: Just because the cast is redlink hell doesn't make it non-notable. There are enough valid sources here to pass  and I'm going to err on the side of caution even if this article is a little weak on the  side
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FILM)

Comment: Topic passes , see news sources in article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)