Deletion of Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination)

Comment: per BOZ.  Also note that per  a '''merge''' must take precedence over a deletion if an appropriate target exists, which List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: While I wholly disagree with this conjectural notion of "NOTBESTIARY", and that WP:NOTMANUAL applies here, multiple reliable independent sources is still a requirement for . As discussed in the Ankheg article AfD #2, I don't find the PFSRD (and by extension, the PF Bestiary) as independent, as it's basically edited licensed WotC content. Now if you had all new material such as appears in the ecology books, that would be another matter. Even if you were to regard the PF Bestiary as independent, a single source is not sufficient for . So if the editors want to keep it, I'd admonish them to dig up more sources (if they exist
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)