Deletion of The House of Fine Art

Comment: per nom. Almost no in-depth coverage exists aside for brief mentioning in some garbage blogs. Really saddens me that some people consider all those obvious  as "reliable sources"... The "Mile Magazine" source is just a brief PR. Only usable  with passable depth is an article from "The Standard", but that's it. All in all this is just a non-notable art dealer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:UGC||WP:RS)

Comment: fails /. Before even commenting here, I had already searched about the HOFA, and was unable to find any in-depth, independent, reliable coverage that comes anywhere close to meeting  or . But I am someone who believes in discussion. So I posted my analysis of every source of the article in the hope of getting others' views. But rather than providing any new material for discussion or any policy-based arguments, they have just provided the copies of ''https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/mayfair-gallery-to-put-its-entire-art-collection-up-for-sale-in-cryptocurrency-a3905356.html LES'' source, which appeared in multiple cryptocurrency promoting blogs/websites. These blogs/sites aren't even counted for notability, per . In any case, they add nothing new. Every thing else has already been explained in my analysis above. And I also note the thorough policy-based analysis of Jytdog. We can waste more time here, but that won't make any difference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG||WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: Delete votes are citing  which has been already satisfied by multiple sources.https://www.milemag.com/the-edit-exhibition-at-hofa-gallery-mayfair/https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/mayfair-gallery-to-put-its-entire-art-collection-up-for-sale-in-cryptocurrency-a3905356.html These sources have significantly discussed the subject and are |independent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:INDEPENDENT)

Comment: This is a business article and therefore must satisfy  not , an error many keep voters are making, and the only article that comes close isn't focused on the organisation itself. Cheers to Jytdog for their hard work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: there's just the one reliable independent source as discussed above, so the subject clearly does not meet any of the applicable notability criteria. NitinMlk's and Jytdog's analyses of the sources are exhaustive and I agree with them entirely.  are much stricter than it used to be (thankfully) and this just doesn't come close to meeting them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: Except the sources provided by users above, https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/arts/mayfair-gallery-to-put-its-entire-art-collection-up-for-sale-in-cryptocurrency-a3905356.html Standard.co.uk (London Evening Standard) also provides significant coverage per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I created the article and avoided make a vote but after having seen a number of established editors able to find reliable sources for the establishing , , I have no doubt now that the article should be absolutely kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:GNG)

Comment: the fact that the gallery takes cryptocurrency is somewhat unique, but not earthshattering.  The source I added points this out.  I'm basing my weak keep vote on the notable artists who exhibited at the gallery, and their pending expansion into the US, making it their third location.  It might be a bit  to get significant US coverage, but I'll keep an eye out with a Google alert
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Apparently no  was not complied with. See https://coinfrenzy.io/hofa-crypto-us-uk/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-art-zhuang/flower-power-chinese-artist-hails-east-west-dialogue-with-petals-idUSKBN1GX2BLhttps://insidebitcoins.com/news/cryptocurrencies-meet-art-at-londons-mayfair-gallery/161827
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Fails  is NOT the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)