Deletion of TRS-80 character set

Comment: sufficiently notable per Matthiaspaul. If you think the article isn't sufficiently sourced, |add them, don't demand that it be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: I'll admit this is bordering on , but I don't see why we need a separate article on the TRS-80 character set.  Some character sets are clearly important (ASCII, EBCDIC, latin-1, unicode, etc) but what's so special about this one?  Yes, the TRS-80 was a significant milestone in the evolution of the PC.  But, every PC manufacturer of the day just took ASCII, added a bunch of graphics characters (mostly to support games), and burned it into a ROM.  There's nothing fundamentally significant about this character set that sets it apart from those used by any other PC of era.  If we do a merge, it should be a selective merge.  Don't bring over the whole character set chart.  Maybe just the intro paragraph, and a small image with a couple of example graphics characters, and the link to Semigraphics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)