Deletion of List of banks (alphabetically)

Comment: Qualifies for an article per  relative to :Category:Banks. |Red-linked articles that qualify for an article as per having received significant coverage (per ) can remain, while those that do not can be de-linked if still verifiable, or removed if unverifiable. As a long article, this can be  as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:REDLINK||WP:GNG||WP:SPLIT||WP:SIZERULE)

Comment: although there could be some discussion about how to organize the various lists found at lists of banks, certainly a list of "all" banks or at least all notable banks is useful. The page could be renamed (the "(alphabetical)" looks weird) or its scope modified to include only notable banks, but outright deletion is not in order as this is a very valid list per  (and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: Clear inclusion criteria of a notable topic. The argument for deletion due to a category existing fails 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: The list is notable per . See ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_WY2aFEf_AwC&pg=PR11 Multinational Banks and Their Social and Labour Practices'', for example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)