Deletion of Nemo Sandman

Comment: WP:V is the big one for all of that. I've already linked to 'er. It has information on reputable sources and whatnot. Also,  doesn't hurt
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: I don't see how it is possible to make these articles pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: definately not a |reliable source. It's just a blurry screencap of ''something'' on Geocities
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: please see the policy on |verifiability and guidelines on Wikipedia:Notability_(people)|notability. They're fairly crucial in an encyclopedia project
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: fails , .  Editor's certainly got a lot of links now, but following Consumed Crustacean, many of them are shaky.  The "cutlery reviews" are in fact on a Geocities website; the Columbus Award link just leads you to the award site, where there is no verification of the claim; the only photography claim with his name on it is likewise on a Geocities site ... and so on and so forth.  When one weeds out Little Nemo in Slumberland and Neil Gaiman references, there are only seven Google hits under Nemo Sandman and 46 under Jean-Manuel Moreau, and most of those are Wikipedia and mirrors, forum or guestbook posts.  Somewhat more damning, he has no more hits than that on the ''French'' Google http://www.google.fr/search?q=+%22Jean-Manuel+Moreau%22&hl=fr&lr=&as_qdr=all&start=60&sa=N
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:VAIN)