Deletion of Frederick Noronha

Comment: Meets the guidelines of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As far as I can tell, the subject meets |guidelines, even if just barely.  Better sources would help
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: FN is a notable journalist, esp. in the cyberspace; his works have been published in many newspapers and journalshttp://news.google.co.in/archivesearch?q=%22Frederick+Noronha%22http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Frederick+Noronha%22 including http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Abbc.co.uk+%22Frederick+Noronha%22 BBC, Outlook (magazine)http://www.outlookindia.com/author.asp?name=Frederick+Noronha, Dawn (newspaper)|Dawnhttp://www.dawn.com/weekly/science/archive/060218/science5.htm etc. He is also notable in Indian FOSS circles. I've added some refs to the article to sort out  and  issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:V)

Comment: The sources for this are all either "biographical statements" of the type normally provided by the subject thereof or are articles that the Fredrick has ''written'', not of which he is the ''subject''.  Thus, this fails the |primary notability criterion, requiring that the subject of an article be the subject of multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  (As a side note, his point about the systemic bias against "non-digitised, largely oral societies" is well taken.  I just don't think it applies to him, a published journalist who speaks before NGOs, and neither does he claim that it should
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)