Deletion of Decline of library usage

Comment: a notable topic, but article is plagued by  issues. An ideal article here would discuss sources that claim a decline as well as those that refute such a decline; a  deleting may be in order, but I'll see what others have to say first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:TNT)

Comment: All problems indicated in the nomination can be solved by editing, therefore they have to be solved by editing, per |our deletion policy: |AFD is not cleanup. Topic is notable and well documented in sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: The current draft requires improvement, not deletion, per our |editing policy.  The worst case would be merger into a section of a larger article such as Library#Usage, for which additional citations are requested.  But there's a lot more to say beyond the narrow perspective of American librarians.  For example, there are widespread library closures in the UK and that aspect is certainly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)