Deletion of Rescue! (2nd nomination)

Comment: Unless further sources arise, I'm not convinced what is currently present makes it meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This quite literally just came out of AfD and (at the very least) warranted a discussion before unilaterally overturning it. I asked for Maury's sources on Talk:Rescue!|the talk page and was told that the http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2014/07/03/miss-dark-days-mac-gaming Kotaku section was "all this article really needs". I still haven't heard back on the German magazine citation, but I see no reason to buy that the Kotaku section (even in addition to whatever German mag is procured) constitutes |significant coverage. This waste of time could have been avoided with just a little forward consideration. {{tq|i=y|what's the hurry here}}—if there's no hurry, leave drafts in draftspace and we wouldn't be here? –&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources addressing the subject in detail to establish notability as required by .  The two sources offered are  in one case and  in the other, the latter source having been published by game publisher with no clear reputation for fact-checking and editorial control
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:UNRELIABLE)