Deletion of Bijan Zamani

Comment: the wp:WP:BLPRS is not satisfied with used sources.Also as  say, Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information. Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I have serious concerns that this is a possible  situation, as I did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Bahram (another article created by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)

Comment: per recent article improvements. He is in multiple mainstream sources and won national awards which clearly meets . According to its 123 sources half the population of his country is using his services. Easily passes notability guidelines. The "Delete" opinions were based on interviews but now the references have changed and interviews not used I don't see any reason to delete this article and I don't see any new comments about this matter from negative voters after recent improvements either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Absurd and suspicious comment by Bakazaka. The article has more than enough in-depth coverage necessary for an  pass from reliable sources. Out of 22 sources only 2 are interviews and they were discussed before on top of the page. No promotion is visible in the article if it is please remove the promotional part. The news organization that you talk about is almost a 70 year old organization with very high reputation. News agencies in the world will NOT publish a press release or promotional news without mentioning that this is a promotional article or sponsored content or not written by our editors. Mehr News Agency and Tehran Times are from the same company and so is many other news organizations in the world, as an example Postmedia Network own more than 30 newspapers and magazines and many other companies that have the same situation in the US, UK. Plus this article has many other sources such as Iran_(newspaper) which is the official daily newspaper of the government of Iran. Jam-e Jam (newspaper) is a daily newspaper published in Iran owned by the National Iranian Radio and Television. Iranian Labour News Agency, Iranian Students News Agency and many others. I'm sure the closing admin will consider the facts and sources only and not the suspicious game that some editors have started here. Please consider that this article has sources from the most reliable sources in Iran and has enough in-depth coverage necessary for an  pass. https://en.mehrnews.com/news/147878/Biography-of-Bijan-Zamani 1, https://en.isna.ir/news/98043116474/Meet-the-first-Iranian-doctor-programmer 2, https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/438396/Bijan-Zamani-s-Success-Story-as-an-Entrepreneur 3, http://www.iran-daily.com/News/255778.html 4, https://irannewsdaily.com/2019/07/why-startups-fail-and-what-you-can-learn-from-them/ 5, https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/438058/Successful-Iranian-Entrepreneurs-You-Should-Know-About 6 … - Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: per John Pack Lambert. Most likely a  article. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: as obvious . This has all the hallmarks of a promotional package in which a press release is pushed to news agencies, interviews are offered, and online reputation/PR firms try to get a subject into Wikipedia. The cited sources are interviews and churnalism. As for the sourcing, well, somehow we've got this far without mentioning that Mehr News Agency and Tehran Times are the same company, which is odd. I'm sure the closing admin will give the socks and SPAs exactly the amount of consideration they deserve
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)