Deletion of Baby Cate

Comment: Subject doesn’t satisfy  & lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources; with the emphasis here being on the “reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Lots of sources covered her ''Self Love'' EP: http://hiphopweekly.com/baby-cate-drops-new-self-love-ep/ hiphopweekly.com https://www.aboutinsider.com/rapper-baby-cate-drops-off-her-self-love/ aboutinsider.com https://www.dailymusicroll.com/entertainment/boston-artist-baby-cate-releases-raw-self-love-ep.html dailymusicroll.com and https://muziquemagazine.com/interview-with-rapper-producer-baby-cate/ muziquemagazine.com was done around the same time. The reviews are standard length and don't really reveal much biographic information, but they are sufficient to barely push past . The article needs to be cleaned-up to only what is sourced though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Fails , only real coverage is from pay-for-press sites. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: per above, with emphasis on the "reliable sources" part indeed.  Frankly, any editor at AfD who employs "But it has a Wikipedia article!" or "they may be part of a larger group" as definitions for "reliable source" (a definition which, after all, encompasses the ''National Enquirer'', the ''Weekly World News'', Stormfront (website)|Stormfront, ''InfoWars'' and other similar bastions of fact checking and integrity) needs a good, hard review of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)