Deletion of Matt Bulman

Comment: As alluded to by Bretonbanquet, many (probably most) articles about English Football League players are created as soon as the player makes his debut, with no more sourcing than a link to Soccerbase (a stats database) and, if you're lucky, a link to the BBC match report that lists his name in the teamsheet. But even that limited level of sourcing does verify that the player passes |the relevant subject-specific notability guideline, and that is enough. The point of the subject-specific guideline is to set a standard at which ''the subject of the article'' can be presumed to meet |the general notability guideline, and to allow time for ''the article about the subject'' to be improved to demonstrate the validity of that presumption. cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: one substitute appearance in a Cup match means he technically scrapes by  by the skin of his teeth - but he comprehensively fails  which is far more important
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly fails , "Players, managers and referees who have represented their country in any FIFA sanctioned senior international match" – NO. "Players who have appeared, and managers who have managed, in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable" – NO. Then we go to GNG and for me it doesn't meet GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: fails  and even though he barely passes , it is not enough to be considered notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)