Deletion of Frances Bean Cobain (2nd nomination)

Comment: The first AfD had it right, and there is no reason to overturn that.  Enough people thought she was notable then, and per #TEMP notability is permanent.  Also, don't overanalyze and overuse OTINHERITED - that's just one section in an essay and simply states that notability is not ''automatically'' inherited; it's a warning against an argument for keeping, not an argument to be used for deletion.  The fact FBC's name is well-known and can be used, for example, by http://www.theonion.com/content/node/25515 The Onion without fear of people wondering who they're talking about, or that she's had a photoshoot in Elle magazine that was discussed http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=7&entry_id=7684 elsewhere is sufficient evidence of notability.  Let's not let Kurt's and Courtney's extreme notability overshadow Frances's minor-but-still-sufficient notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: While I would agree with a merge to the article of a parent if only one were notable, since both are notable, there is no logical merge target. In divorce court custody of the children must be decided, but in an encyclopedia, there is no need to try to split the baby. Also since there are several media interviews of the subject, we have multiple secondary sources, which meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)