Deletion of Sonar (software quality)

Comment: this still doesn't seem to use  and hasn't established 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE)

Comment: At least two of the links you added are blogs, which fail . Additionally, one of links (third from the bottom in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sonar_(software_quality)&oldid=290924128 this edit) only has a link to Sonar. The link that's second from the bottom only mentions Sonar once in a list. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per the lack of |reliable sources. I have done several searches for sources but have been unable to find any due to unrelated results showing up. If the creator of this article can find some reliable sources (even if they are written in French), I would be willing to reconsider my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I rewrote the paragraph about plug-ins and the article no longer seems promotional in the least.  For notability and verifiability concerns, see , especially the first two sections as the primary problem I see with the article is a lack of included reliable independent references.  I didn't look for resources myself, I am responding to the request for assistance.  Also review 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:COI)