Deletion of Kevin Whitrick (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is clearly . A non-notable person commits suicide (which isn't that uncommon) in front of a bunch of losers who actually sit and watch it. Where is the notability? Then the ratings hungry media decides to cover it long enough to give the guy the 15 minutes he never had in life. Then they move on to something else
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: The reason given above misses the point. I live in the UK and can remember the huge controversy and media coverage that this event caused at the time. The article meets , although it does deal primarily with the controversy surrounding his death, which has become part of Internet folklore
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Enough coverage in |third party sources to be worth a brief standalone article. See also Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Internet suicide is a phenomenon that passes . It might be better to deal with all of the notable cases in one article, rather than spreading them out and having  criticisms
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT)