Deletion of Bruenor Battlehammer (3rd nomination)

Comment: the arguments put forth by John Pack Lambert, TTN and the nom appear to be the most accurate assessment of sourcing, and as such fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article passed the previous AFD unanimously, and then subsequently passed a related deletion review sponspored by the original nominator, also unanimously.  It has been substantially modified since then to improve the referencing and reduce the in-world/ploy synopsis issues. This nomination is part of a series of nominations for deletion of fictional characters/elements by a single editor, who, by their own admission, is "suffering from fancruft overdose" (see rticles for deletion/Mega-City One); and  does not qualify as a valid argument for deletion.  The character referenced by this article is a major character in a fictional series of books and as such is inherently notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: or redirect. The only source is a trivial Top X list. Previous AfDs are irrelevant if enough time has passed. Articles must be assessed by current standards. There's no real world information aside from the one irrelevant source, so it fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:WAF)