Deletion of Yukichi Chuganji (2nd nomination)

Comment: He was the oldest man in the world out of several billion and one of the oldest men of all time. Coverage in sources exist. Passes . Why is  being vehemently applied to longevity articles, but not others? Just because you don't find the information interesting doesn't mean it isn't of interest to others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: Since when is a single  BBC obit |significant coverage in multiple, independent |reliable sources. Per , everything of importance in this article can be easily covered in appropriate lists. This article can only be a . It should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB)

Comment: There is a massive inconsistency in that the article's two sources (both  obituaries) claim he was the world's oldest man around the time of his death while the entire article goes into a circular speak about how he wasn't considered the world's oldest man at that time due to the Kamato Hongo issues. As such, we have two routine obituaries which don't show particularly notable coverage as the only sources about him (citation 3 to Table C is entirely a sourcing issue about whether or not the GRG or Guinness believed or didn't believe in the ''Hongo'' claim and isn't related to Chuganji. It seems like it's a  theory that anyone believed that Hongo was the world's oldest man (making the whole GRG craziness more suspect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:FRINGE)