Deletion of Stephen Petraeus

Comment: per |past outcomes; see, ''e.g.'', Roderick Wetherill, Jr..  We have almost always merged miltary sons' articles into their more notable fathers' articles. I can't see why this should be treated any differently. If anyone has a better argument for outright deletion, in light of past precedent, please come forth now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: as it fails  and does not meet |BLP criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP)

Comment: fails  given that this is a living person with no specific grounds for being considered notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Mentions by his father or pictures taken of him by the media with his father does not make Stephen notable.  Though widely covered it is little more than trivial coverage that does not address Stephen in detail so he fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails ; US-cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)