Deletion of 2012 Tel Aviv bus bombing

Comment: To the main conflict page. Unnecessary amount of detail that can be condensed and merged. This isn't necessarily a POV fork but it is #NEWS
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: While the fact that people are making this into a POV fork is a problem, it is also, simply, completely non-notable. |Wikipedia is not a newspaper - not even an Israeli newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: this article has received fair amount of coverage in reliable sources to merit its own article. I agree with {{UT|Ryan Vesey}} about . But now '''it seems to have been turned into a redirect''', why
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: This is a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Per  the main article is already too large so it would reasonable to have this article as  has been met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: Currently, the sources show it to be just |one of many bus bombings, and reporting yet another one just because the latest newspapers mention it is a fundamental failure of our not-a-newspaper policy.  Come back when you have coverage in permanent sources like books or academic journals, or come back when news media refer to it as a past event against which the present should be measured
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: an independently reported mass casualty terror attack is significant and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails  - there is nothing that I can see that suggests that this event has had or will have any significant lasting effects that could make it notable. Are there any sources that discuss the bombing that weren't published on the day? I don't find TheCuriousGnome's argument convincing as no event is 'inherently notable' regardless of whether it receives international coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Per NOT#NEWS,  and, sadly, un of the mill and  year test. Newsworthiness is not notability. Unfortunately, events of this magnigtude are a frequent occurence in just about any armed conflict, and this one is not particularly notable, especially as there were no fatalities. Despite widespread new coverage, there is little chance of this being considered particularly significant next month, never mind in ten years. Also agree that there is some nationalistic victimization going on here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:R||WP:10||WP:10 year test)