Deletion of National Operation Anti-Vivisection

Comment: The relevant guideline at  says ''A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization.'' The article appears to meet this standard. In contrast, the three sentences in the nomination fail to make a convincing case for the articles deletion: WP:SPA is an essay that does not recommend automatic deletion of articles written by newcomers (it actually references the guideline  instead), age of the organization is not mentioned as a criterion at , and a minimum source count of five is not supported by our notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:BITE)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON/. Organization just established, attracted a little attention for one event, but not seeing enough about anything else. --&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: WP:PROMO 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)