Deletion of Spanish profanity (2nd nomination)

Comment: we went through this with Italian awhile back, and Spanish is no less encyclopedic (I'll admit my bias, I speak Spanish fluently and Italian less than fluently).  And dictionaries are suddenly suspect as |reliable sources, my, my, if it isn't on American Idol or related to Pokemon I guess some think that WP shouldn't have to include it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Okay, I've reviewed , as well as the article and similar articles. It's true that Wikipedia is not a dictionary or jargon guide, but I don't see how this article is acting as a jargon guide. The article is not an instructional guide to cussing in Spanish, it is instead and informative article about Spanish language profanity, including a good deal of background information, context and the like. The appropriate question, therefore, is not one of "Is this article a language guide?" (as it isn't), but is instead "Is the subject of Spanish profanity notable?", to which I would answer that yes, it's notable enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: definitely, as an interesting and useful account of groups of concepts and their usage spanning various parts of the Spanish-speaking world and transcending the artificial boundaries between dictionary and encyclopedia in the grand tradition of the Grand Larousse encyclopédique | Larousse encyclopedic dictionary. Far more than offering dictionary definitions or translations, this article does not merely offer a guide to mould usage, but gives helpful contextualising information adding to understanding -- whether or not one speaks some variety of Spanish. And  | neologisms form only a miniscule part of the usage discussed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: clear case of . I see a lot of  arguments calling for "speedy keep" (apparently the !voters are unversed in  policy), none of which have addressed the policy concern of WINAD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD||WP:ITSUSEFULL||WP:CSK)