Deletion of Laura Diaz Anadon

Comment: while agreeing previous version of article was substandard, but after searching, references were found and added. Her work is cited heavily with http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=sM4yknMAAAAJ&hl=en 451 citations mostly since 2009. That's roughly 100 citations per year. Plus, being the director of the Belfer Center of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government is an important position. She received prestigious  awards -- one presented to her at the http://www-archive.ceb.cam.ac.uk/pages/prizes-and-awards-2005.html House of Commons. QED sharp cookie, active academic, well quoted, important position, meets , also energy and water tech policy will be increasingly important in coming decades. All considered: publishing, awards, top position, suggests she meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence of passing any of the  criteria, even in the longer and now-redacted copyvio version
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: With the exception of CS, I'm not an advocate of GS for the hard sciences (the subject is a ChemE by trade). WoS shows statistics that are very much in line with the "average assistant professor at a top institution": around 150 total citations and h-index 7 with some short quotes of her work in the media/web-o-sphere. I think this is the archetypical 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)