Deletion of Dilemma

Comment: per . It was in a dictionary-definition-like state for a long time, but now it's in better shape. Importantly, there is now enough content to demonstrate that a broad-concept article is feasible, and to show a path to one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN)

Comment: I think the Dilemma would make a great |broad concept article. The concept of a dilemma isn't something that needs disambiguation: it's pretty clear that in any usage, a dilemma is a choice between mutually disjoint options. Of course the article should be scrapped: currently, it is nothing more than a dictionary definition, and a bad one at that. However, there is plenty of room to sketch different uses of dilemma, and plenty of good source. We should discuss https://www.britannica.com/topic/dilemma-logic dilemma in formal logic, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-dilemmas/ moral dilemmas, notions of dilemma in deontic logic, and the popular usage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:CONCEPTDAB)

Comment: Ethical dilemmas, Buridan's ass-type practical dilemmas, and economic strategy points such as the Triffin dilemma can be in a base article. Applying  here is going to be beneficial, and more so than moving the existing dilemma (disambiguation). Sure, the area looks undeveloped here, but a constructive approach can be taken
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)