Deletion of Bad Newz Kennels dog fighting investigation

Comment: This nomination seems to be bad-faith and |pointy as this AfD is the only contribution of BDFEF. There are over 130 sources cited within the article, it was one of the largest and most publicized criminal investigations of 2007 and brought the issue of dogfighting to the forefront within the United States. Merging it to Michael Vick would be virtually impossible with everything listed within the article, and the nominator's claims that this is a 'pathetic waste' are untrue as just about everything is sourced. Also note that Michael Vick wasn't the only figure in this, so to merge it within there would be clumsy. There could be some editing of the article to be sure, but to delete and merge would be too rash. Also, court proceedings are continuing as far as state charges and the NFL's own future reaction, so while the investigation may be over, everything else continues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: In addition, this investigation has FOUR subjects, not ONE. Also, as noted above, since it meets , it will never lose it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This article meets all of the qualifications under , and is a historic moment in animal cruelty. In addition, this is a high profile active criminal ongoing investigation, insofar as Gerald Poindexter and the State of Virginia are concerned. But I am not surprised that such deletion nominations have occurred, as noted for reasons stated below this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)