Deletion of List of standardized tests in the United States

Comment: Notable subjects, clear criteria for inclusion, a wealth of independent commentary: what's not to like about this list?  It just goes to show you that the "|indiscriminate" label is too subjective to be meaningful, and needs to be dropped.FWIW, and not as a specific or personal criticism of any participant here, it does seem that |argumentative rebuttals to "keep" opinions are getting out of hand again.  Put your best case in your nomination or your opinion, but don't quarrel if others disagree
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:BASH)

Comment: Looks like a well-done list on a notable topic. There are many lists on wikipedia. See  and Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists. This is not an indiscriminate list of info. Looks specific to me. Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles|Spinout lists are fine too. One can create other more specific lists of tests, and then remove them from this list, and just leave the link to the spinout list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: Standardized tests are a major part of U.S. education, and presenting the tests which exist in the form of a list is a valid way to do it, and easy for the reader. Per , I think this passes all three purposes; it is informative, it helps readers navigate, and the redlinks aid in further development of this area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)