Deletion of Jennifer Strange

Comment: Deletion would be fine with me as the subject does not meet , but since this is already at KDND, that is the logical place for a redirect if that is the consensus
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per Dhartung, and this is |not a memorial. '''Do Not Redirect''', as it isn't an obvious search term for Wii or water intoxication, and will be less so with the passage of time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: There has been at least one front page news article every day about this subject.  It is notability due to the controversy of the radio station's negligence and ultimate criminal and civil liability, and will generate significant press coverage in the future.  Clearly meets  far more than many biographical articles.  The incident is relevant in the KDND article and Water intoxication article, but only as an aside, not to the extent that is currently devoted to the subject.  The KDND article, for example, is now very unbalanced with all the information on this incident that has been "merged" into it unnecessarily: there are four paragraphs about the station itself and a dozen about this incident.  Somebody a month from now will rightly trim the article down to refocus on the station itself and the content will be lost
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: with water intoxication and/or KDND, failing that, '''delete'''.  A clear case of  that fails the 100 year test of  - would anyone, in a hundred years (or even a year's) time really look up this article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT||WP:BIO)