Deletion of Franz Klainsek

Comment: As noted upthread, does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I did my own search and found nothing more than the nom did. Don't think this passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am indebted to Galobtter for making the "alternate" article content available, and to Artlover06 for identifying further online coverage - and have reviewed it all carefully. We can be in no doubt the subject of the article exists but I see nothing that meets the  - the majority of the content does not appear to be "independent of the subject" and there is nothing that comes close to "significant coverage". Assessing against  it is apparent that the artist's work appears in some galleries but there is no evidence of any of it having: "(a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums". Clearly there has been some problematic editing here too, and the article has been promotional and non-neutral - but purely on grounds of notability, this article is at best premature and should be deleted, and it should not be recreated until/unless circumstances significantly change
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: fails GNG as there is inadequate SIGCOV. I removed most of the external links as they were mostly things like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Franz_Klainsek&diff=874207936&oldid=874195503 this event announcement added by artlover06, which aren't necessary and do nothing to contribute to notability. After collapsing several duplicate sources it's clear that the article has been massively puffed up by the addition of anything at all that has the words "Franz Klainsek" in it. Artlover06, you need to read  and stop adding poor quality items to this article. Adding sources like ISSU means you don;t understand that self-published items like ISSU are not a reliable source. (Also, before you reply, please read  about how not to act at an AfD. The large plastered walls of text above are hindering, not helping, your argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLUDGEON)