Deletion of Aleksander Piotr Mohl

Comment: The sources seem pretty loose. I can appreciate that he lived a while ago, but nevertheless, it is clear that a lot of the information required to pass  is either trivial or speculation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not notable for stand alone article. It does not say he was the "source of a major US war plan leak", but only "mentioned as a possible source"; that means nothing. Reads like a family newsletter. emorial also applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)

Comment: I would withdraw this nom but there is still no source for what I think is the biggest notability claim - most awards. For example Cross of Merit (Poland) is on the level it likely makes the subject notable, but - we need a proof for it beyond a blurry photo (I am afraid interpreting the photo as editors would make us violate 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The subject clearly passes . The article needs work/improvement; not a nomination in AfD. For the OR, we have {{tl|original reasearch}} tag. Sources need to be found/translated. Looking at subject's activity period, it is understandable if a lot of sources are not available in "online format". One should change preferences in their search engine, and look for more sources from different languages including Polish. Given that he passes notabilty criteria (), and the article was created on June 11, the article should be given a little time to be improved. The article is not a failure on notability criteria, it has issues with OR, and sources. That should be worked on. —usernamekiran
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:MILPEOPLE)