Deletion of RedHack

Comment: Sources already cited establish notability; there are a variety of sources, and of English articles I read, I just don't see a partisan bias. Specific issues of concern (conflict of interest or partisan sources) in the article should be handled through the normal editing process, not through article deletion, according to AfD guidelines at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I agree with User:Stalwart111. This article has been edited by close to 20 different registered users, including at least one administrator. There is a lack of conformance to |the Wikipedia Manual of Style, but that's not a reason for a deletion discussion. It has a plethora of cites. (I have a hard time getting my head around the idea of a 'Marxst-Lenninist' hacker group, but that's a problem that can be solved by a text elaboration). , that's hard to discern, considering there's been 20 or so registered editors ''and'' not an argument for an AfD. And how can ''any'' article be a '''dubious subject'''? What does that even mean? 'Partisan'? Does that mean ? That's not a reason for an AfD; besides, who can tell with this article - it has not been developed enough. Keep, and sort it all out by , not drive by tagging
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS||WP:COI||WP:POV||WP:BRD)