Deletion of Cultural matters related to Hillary Rodham Clinton

Comment: edit conflict) as distinguishing between major and minor controversies is entirely based on opinion and therefore, inherently |POV and |unverifiable.  These controversies have all been covered in |reliable sources numerous times and so are notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Gossipfluffpoliticocruft. Unencyclopedic trivia for the most part. Relevant policy would be  (not an indiscriminate collection of information) plus overarching Wikipedia mission statement that it is primarily an encyclopedia. We're writing biographical articles, not detailed books with every minute detail of a person's career history. Media coverage does not automatically translate to encyclopedic value. A couple of the points might be okay as a merge to the controversies article, but should be cut down significantly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)