Deletion of Presumption of guilt

Comment: per {{U|DGG}}. This does not rise to the level of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: as, at the very least, unsalvageable . See https://en.wikipedia.org/?oldid=928278663#A_mess my comments on the article talk page but the rest of the talk page as well, where the obvious rampant SYNTH has been complained about for ages. To be fair, https://en.wikipedia.org/oldid=903750910 here's what the article looked like when I made those comments, and some of the worst stuff has been cut since then, but it's still a bunch of random stuff, just less of it. The whole list at ==Typology== is simply ridiculous. And how on earth Jonathan Schell could be worked in as a source is completely beyond me. My god, wherever you look it's just ghastly.{{pb}}It's like a road accident -- I can't look away. OK, one more example then I'll stop, I promise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per . I don't see a real topic here, instead I see a seemingly random (= someone used the Google search) collection of things that really aren't even connected to the "topic". Editors keep removing text from the page, I see Rushdie's fatwa was just removed, and I didn't understand the revelance of it either but I also don't see the relevance of a plea bargain or apocalypticism, collective guilt etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)