Deletion of Verject

Comment: Appears to fail the conditions specified in Wikipedia's |policy for the inclusion of articles on neologisms.  Unless someone can supply the reliable sources necessary to show that those conditions ''are'' satisfied, the article should be deleted. Even if use of the term were to become sufficiently widespread to provoke discussion of its definition in reliable secondary sources, it seems unlikely that there would ever be much scope for an article's including anything more than a bare definition of the term.  In that case Wiktionary, not Wikipedia, would seem to be the proper place for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Fails .  Aside from the one PDF reference, the only other things I could find online were internet forums discussing the recent "invention" of this word, and how it isn't an actual term.  That's not to say non-internet sources don't exist, but it seems very doubtful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)