Deletion of List of companies that halted U.S. political contributions in January 2021

Comment: While on the surface, it may appear to pass , the selection criteria is far from unambiguous. How long a pause is sufficient? Did a company have to pause in the week after January 6 to be on the list? Did a company PAC have to stop all donations or just to certain members of Congress? While the page describes itself as dynamic, are companies still making decisions in the aftermath of January 6? A better way is to use prose with examples of some companies that did pause donations in the "aftermath" section and provide a couple of links to sources that did provide a (partial) list
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: per Egsan Bacon's explanation of  &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: per . {{tq|Selection criteria... should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources.}} Is a "list of companies that halted U.S. political contributions in January 2021" open to several meanings? No, either a company halted donations or did not halt donations. That all of them did not halt donations to the same extent does not change the fact that "Did this company halt political donations in January 2021?" is a yes/no question. Is it subjective? Again, no, for the same reason. Is it supported by reliable sources? Yes, every entry on the list is sourced. As the list covers actions taken in a specific time period that has now passed, the possibility that future entries to the list will change the answers to those questions is not a concern
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)