Deletion of Mogollon Monster

Comment: to Bigfoot, which I had |boldy done when it was first created. It's |non-notable, fails , but still a plausible search term
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD||WP:NOTE||WP:V)

Comment: Has not demonstrated notability for its own article. We deleted Jacobs creature via AFD -- another supposed Bigfoot sighting -- for the same reasons, and that one was ''slightly'' more notable than this one (and thus gets a glancing mention in the main Bigfoot article. Being a regular at that article I can state that this one wouldn't be mentioned even there by the standards we've established (following ,  and ), so it obviously doesn't deserve a page of its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:UNDUE||WP:FRINGE)