Deletion of Electoral history of Sarah Palin

Comment: It is not redundant. The only thing at Sarah Palin#Electoral history is a link to this article, and This was created because of complaints that the section had |undue weight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUEWEIGHT)

Comment: by nominator.  The electoral history article now looks much better with the tables moved to it, but the original section is now empty without any summary, which does ''not'' adhere to , Happyme22.  Although other politician articles do that, it is still not correct to have an empty header, and they all have significantly more electoral information, making it actually worthwhile to have a new article.  As she does not have as many elections to record, and the main article is not as relatively long, I still see no need for a new list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)