Deletion of Going Down in LA-LA Land

Comment: I really can't find anything |reliable and significant beyond the Variety source, and even the Variety source is ~75% plot summary rehash and 25% review/editorial. There's enough of what ''looks'' like unreliable chatter out there to suggest, to me, some borderline case to be made for notability, but in my opinion this falls short. I'll happily change my vote if someone else can provide better evidence of coverage that is '''both''' reliable and significant in scope. I'm finding lots of one or the other, nothing that is both
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE)

Comment: Sources might seem a bit thin at current, but there is every prospect this will improve in the near future based on the well known actors in it (such as Bruce Vilanch) and the notability of the director (Casper Andreas), on this basis there is a good case to meet otability (films)#Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films|Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films criteria. If the cast were a bunch of unknowns I might propose serfication|Userfication but it seems excessive here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:U)

Comment: I found a review in Variety (magazine)|Variety which I've added to the article. I'm having a difficult time finding additional coverage in |reliable sources, although there is certainly no shortage of notices related to the film running in various festivals, as well as a decent amount of blogosphere coverage. This is pretty borderline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE)