Deletion of Dellen Millard

Comment: None of the reasons for deletion fit any criteria we have. Nothing I read in the article is libelous -- he's been charged with murder and that's what the article states. As for the right to innocence, this does not apply as no judgment has been made in the article. Nothing is written here that would not be published in a newspaper. As for "contempt of court" -- seriously? How so? Has anyone involved in writing the article been called as witnesses? The only criteria we are concerned with is notability and this article may not meet notability requirements per  or something similar. If Millard's only notability is being charged with murder, then he may not be notable and this article could be redirected to any article dealing with the murder
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This article goes against  and . {{Color|green|A person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law.}} The alleged crimes may be notable ''when'' they are proven in a court of law, not before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: per nom.  specifies that we have a rule about ''not'' creating permanent encyclopedia articles about people whose main claim of |notability is having been ''charged'' with, but not yet convicted of, a crime. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when a conviction actually takes place, but in the meantime it's not appropriate and actually has the potential to become the ''cause'' of a mistrial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:N)