Deletion of One Love Party

Comment: Not enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to |verify or |sustian article. Fails |Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:NORG)

Comment: As a full disclosure, I am the editor who nominated Ankit Love for deletion. The arguments for Love's deletion nomination ''cannot be carried over'' as an argument for deleting the One Love Party article - it must be assessed for it's own merit independently of the other deletion discussion. That said I would like to draw your attention to the |sockpuppetry comments made on that discussion as it is of relevance to this one. As for this AfD, I would come down on the side of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOC)

Comment: per nom. Most of the blog posts and passing mentions are connected to the London mayoral election in which Ankit Love ran dead last for the "One Love Party." As others have noted, the term https://books.google.com/books?id=oFXwNt6XVBYC&pg=PA312&dq=%22One+Love+Party%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi27Max_PfMAhUJHlIKHa45AHwQ6AEIHTAA#v=onepage&q=%22One%20Love%20Party%22&f=false "One Love Party" is an alternate name for the Trinidad and Tobago National Alliance for Reconstruction party, an organization unconnected to Mr. Love's organization. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: Many of the sources - such as http://europe.newsweek.com/what-if-war-between-pakistan-and-india-went-nuclear-332561?rm=eu "What If a War Between Pakistan and India Went Nuclear?" and https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/architecture-design-blog/2014/jan/02/norman-foster-skycycle-elevated-bike-routes-london "Norman Foster unveils plans for elevated 'SkyCycle' bike routes in London" - do not deal with the One Love Party at all and are included as |promotional material for the subject. The few sources that directly deal with the subject comprise ''normal coverage'' of an election campaign. The party has not received ''significant coverage'' required to fulfill the WP|GNG and the party is non-notable according to  too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:NORG)

Comment: Wikipedia write articles about notable subjects and delete articles about non-notable subjects. To argue a non-notable article should be kept because it may do better in future is a |fundamental misunderstanding of the notability guidelines. You mention the number of page views as greater than the Green Party of England and Wales|Green Party during the mayoral election but that demonstrates exactly why we have a responsibility to delete the article. One Love is contesting the Tooting by-election, 2016|Tooting by-election but has an article like other notable parties where other non-notable parties do not. This places |undue weight on One Love at the expense of other parties to the election which is likely why the page views fell the way they did during the mayoral campaign. If One Love is notable "in a year or two" then of course it can easily be remade but not until that time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:UNDUE)