Deletion of Zydus Wellness

Comment: Promotion of a trading company, there is no independent commentary on the company, but a lot of non-independent glowing comments.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The article passes both  and . Yes, it needs editing to remove the promotional tone, but the article that can be fixed through editing, is not a candidate for AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: Enough coverage to satisfy  and . It is also edited to remove promotional tone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: A large  FMCG company. Nothing about the article is promotional in nature. Other editors are more than welcome to improve this "substandard" article. The nominator has marked it as a paid article... On what basis? God knows
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)

Comment: into Cadila Healthcare.  The present article is a mix of prospectus and advertisement (I've added a cleanup tag in case we don't manage to delete it).  Although the company is , I'm concerned there's nothing at all to say about it beyond coverage of financial transactions and glowing reviews or at least lists of its products.  It is clearly notable enough to be mentioned somewhere but it really doesn't seem to warrant an article separate from its parent company.  This is true even though stock in the company might be traded independently of its parent.  Wikipedia is not a stock market analyst desk
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)