Deletion of Elisa Gabrielli

Comment: The nominator hit it on the head: there are no independent sources other than IMDB listed, and she has not done anything as an actress to meet 's criteria for actresses
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per |verifiability of career and |sources found and offered that address this individual directly and in detail. Adding them to the article is an |issue best adressed throuh regular editing and not requiring a deletion. Is she the most notable ever? Nope. Is she ''just'' notable enough? Yes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NRVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: Passes , per sources provided at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elisa_Gabrielli Talk Elisa Gabrielli
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Her extensive list is also confirmed by Special:WhatLinksHere/Elisa Gabrielli. The reason for this deletion request is that all that work has not generated any "significant coverage in reliable sources." Does she meet ?I think this is another case where Wikipedia's notability requirements prevent encyclopedic articles for people with extensive credits. Hundreds of obscure dead composers and their works and interpreters would not have Wikipedia articles if those rules were not (correctly) disregarded
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: on balance. I wasn't entirely convinced by the notability argument until I read the talk page. Assuming the offline sources are as significant in coverage as they would appear to be, that looks like pretty convincing evidence for  compliance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)