Deletion of George Vithoulkas

Comment: lets cool this for a moment because the last thing we need is a battle. Articles to be included in Wikipedia need to fulfill certain policies and guidelines, where the adhering to the policies is mandatory and the adherence to guidelines a question of debate. The first policy is , whereby it has to be proven by second party sources that a subject is notable. The second would be  which says that the content of an article has to be attributable to a second party source. Our problem is that, as is, this article fails at least  because we can hardly say that the Society of Homeopaths would be a second party source as Dr. (Mr.) Vithoulkas would be a member of it. We cannot say that a book written by the person is a second party source. What does certainly not work is first party sources, as any of these would fall under . I am always happy to be wrong about the notability of a person but I cannot take the word from someone for it, I need sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:A||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: as NN, shaky on .  It's amusing that his article claims 80,000 Google hits, which it does ... off of the Greek Google, using his surname alone.  Well, heck, if you just Google ''my'' surname, it returns over 1.6 '''million''' hits.  Googling his full name returns '''eleven''' hits on US Google.  Nice try
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The subject does appear to more than meet the criteria set out at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)