Deletion of Laurel Coppock

Comment: She does not satisfy  or  as none of her roles appear to be very significant. Also, what the heck is this supposed to mean?: {{xt|Rotten Tomatoes gives her a 78% rating for her role in Crazy, Stupid, Love with a total box office of $84.3M
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: I'm all in favor of following Wikipedia guidelines. That's how/why I created the article and why I defended it with specific reasons for each of the items in . If someone wishes to refute those, how about using some specific arguments in the discussion rather than simply say that she "does not satisfy  or "?  I'll abide by whatever the Wikipedia community decides ... let's all remember that Wikipedia decisions are made by consensus and discussion, not majority voting
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: This article clearly satisfies , specifically
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)