Deletion of Gerald Gurian

Comment: per  with a doze of ; a barely readable vanity page. Not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:TNT)

Comment: u|Tosresearcher}}, Your major hurdle here is that currently Gurian doesn´t seem to be  in the WP-sense, so take a hard look at . Now, forget wikis/usergenerated (Memory Alpha), for this discussion all blogs, his own websites, and also, ''passing mentions'' like  http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/blogcritics/article/Book-Review-These-Are-the-Voyages-The-True-5949029.php. IF the article survives some of this could be of use, but right now it´s irrelevant. The book may be  or not, but per WP-logic, that doesn´t mean the author is automatically notable in himself. Of the sources currently in the article, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/10652413/Oscars-the-award-for-the-most-valuable-prop-goes-to....html is the one that helps your case, but far from enough. You need stuff like that, only more and better. Until that happens, this article shouldn´t be on Wikipedia. You could try asking for input at the talkpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek. Also, if you are Gerald Gurian (username sorta hints it), please follow . Good luck
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:GNG||WP:COI||WP:notable)