Deletion of Andrew Giallombardo

Comment: It meets  and seems that the argument for deletion is premised on some default of deleting any American soccer player not in MLS. That is a false standard. Even if we don't elect to write articles for all "the thousands of other amateur players"  as Moreno Oso pointed out, that is  and the absence of articles for every amateur player does not mean this one should likewise be deleted. It looks fairly substantial at this point. The presumption is established, and personally I have to disagree with a strict deletionist perspective here. We can't include everyone, but we can include an unlimited number of notable persons
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: fails  and /N since he has no professional experience. Whether he is promising is irrelevant to the question. The last thing we need is to relax the guidelines - there are already far too many articles on footballers. While some may regard Giallombardo as a high caliber player, the Wikipedia standard is whether he has played a professional game: if he has, he is deemed good enough to be included; if he has not, he is not good enough YET and he should not have a page to himself YET. While some may want to track Giallombardo's career, Wikipedia is not the medium for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATH||WP:FOOTY)

Comment: per . The subject received "significant coverage" from two |reliable sourced international newswires that are "independent" of soccer associations or websites. Additionally, there are enough secondary sources to indicate no |original research is needed as per  to "extract the content". The coverage as  is significant because he was mentioned by name in the articles' titles and filled the reports
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:OR)