Deletion of Thomas Adams (cricketer)

Comment: fails . Nothing notable about him in my searches. WP:ATD is redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets . Nominator didn't do a WP:BEFORE to show the opposite. The nominator nominated (automatically) a large amount of cricketeers. It would have been better to made a bunch of them in one nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Passes . The nom made a recent Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#RfC_on_NCRIC|failed RfC to remove the said notability requirements. Since then, they have tried to circumnavigate this by making mass redirects instead. The nom has said that they "Special:Diff/995494268|have no beef with Lugnuts", however following their failed RfC, have seemingly gone out of their way to target artciles I've worked on. Another Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_WP:NSPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|RfC on sporting articles closed with the comments "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". And yet, there have been 25+ AfDs logged by Fram in a 15/20 minute window, indicating no  was used
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Like the previous two people who have posted before me. It now officialy passes  and  with those sources to the University of Otago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCRIC)

Comment: not only per  but also GNG. The obituary and “Long Record” articles establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)