Deletion of Brian Harris (translation researcher)

Comment: Mentioned several times in https://www.google.ca/search?q=Brian+Harris+translation+researcher&oq=Brian+Harris+translation+researcher&aqs=chrome..6t9i57j69i60l3.173j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=Brian+Harris+translation+researcher&tbm=bks Google Books as an expert in their field, which would make them meet both  and . These sources include a book on how to interpret Harris's work on natural translation http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=58984&cid=527 and a https://books.google.ca/books?id=S0FWBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA272&dq=Brian+Harris+translation+researcher&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjYw8C07uTNAhVLqh4KHWzLANgQ6AEIJjAC#v=onepage&q=Brian%20Harris%20translation%20researcher&f=false book that describes him as a pioneer in using already translated texts to aid in machine translation, among others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: but willing to be persuaded. Neither publishing nor having one's publications cited by others satisfies , ''but'' making "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" does. I see suggestions (e.g. https://books.google.ca/books?id=S11iAAAAMAAJ&q=Brian+Harris+translation+researcher&dq=Brian+Harris+translation+researcher&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjyo4uu_uzNAhXFn5QKHSy1DgcQ6AEIOzAG here) that he "introduced the notion of bi-text". But that's not a notion I've heard of, so I can say whether it's a significant impact. I don't see evidence of notable fellowships, chairs, editing, or the like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)