Deletion of Raphaël W.Pathé

Comment: Wikipedia:Please sign your posts on talk pages|Please sign your posts with four tildes.) I understand that it is possible that someone has been covered in print media that does not have a web presence, but it is very rare for a currently notable person to be notable without having that reflected on the web somewhere. In the end, if they are notable, that proof of notability will appear eventually and then you can always appeal for |deletion review to restore the article. For the time, I don't find evidence of notability. On this basic point, despite your protests, I think relying on web results is sufficient. Do note that IMDB's open submission policies mean that it is not a reliable indicator of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: Please do not remove my comments as part of your edits, though the one you did remove I would not consider vandalism.   To respond to your arguments, I first suggest that you read Wikipedia|No personal attacks.  And no, it is not a personal thing.  I am not convinced that this individual satisfies , and I have yet to encounter any evidence otherwise.  Particularly, there is no evidence that he has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works.  The notability of PinkTV is irrelevent as I have not nominated it for deletion. The notability of Raphael Pathe is in question, and he needs to be able to stand on his own merit.  Also, the "if you delete this article then you must delete all others" is not a strong argument.  It merely suggests that there are other articles that require the attention of an AfD debate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: One entry in IMDb, alongside literally dozens of other "pinksetters". The fact that he was ''in'' a video does not make him the subject ''of'' the video, which is what he's required to be to meet our |notability standards. Redirecting would only encourage similar article creation and similar time spent processing AfDs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Nektaartv, I believe Resolute was using his sister as an example of why IMDb is not a |reliable source, which makes it quite relevant.  I also suggest that you avoid stating that other people are not sufficiently qualified to discuss articles on AfD; Wikipedia's policies/guidelines are rather universal and are applied to all sorts of fields.  The same biographical guidelines for notability apply to people whether they be actors, political figures, or mathematicians
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: From NektaarTV's comments, this person does not appear to be notable.  General audience members certainly do not constitute |reliable sources, which also makes me concerned about the |verifiability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)