Deletion of David Biro

Comment: per , NAUTHOR, and . I don't see what ''he'' has done is especially notable as an academic; we rarely keep ''associate'' professors. It might be a reason to keep because his books have been reviewed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per .  I've found several more reviews. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/00/03/12/bib/000312.rv130813.htmlhttps://www.jaad.org/article/S0190-9622(01)70198-3/fulltexthttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10912-011-9161-5https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/11/5/800/1843489  His ''100 days'' book is better reviewed than his others, but I think the reviews are spread out enough to support a solid keep case (rather than redirect to the book).  The article here needs a good reworking, but I don't think it's so bad as for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:TNT)