Deletion of Stefano Chiodaroli

Comment: per apparent failed , passes  and . While  his most significant television and film works are redlinks in en.wiki they are notable and they have articles on Italian wikipedia. Coverage in Italian is easily foundable (http://laprovinciapavese.gelocal.it/pavia/cronaca/2007/08/13/news/a-vigevano-mi-ricarico-1.600822, http://www.varesenews.it/2015/10/caffe-doppio-lappuntamento-e-con-stefano-chiodaroli/406844/, http://www.genovatoday.it/eventi/stefano-chiodaroli-recco.html, http://www.italiapost.info/173700-stefano-chiodaroli-clan-divorziate-babila-milano/, http://www.ilgiorno.it/legnano/spettacoli/2012/06/07/725193-stefano_chiodaroli_magriffe.shtml),  including articles in major newspapers such as  ''La Repubblica'' (http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/17/comico-per-fiction.html, http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2005/12/28/grissini-risate-arriva-chiodaroli.html), ''Il Giornale'' (http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/quei-grissini-sono-impastati-spirito-chiodaroli.html)  and ''Corriere della Sera'' (http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2006/giugno/03/elezioni_ridicole_Stefano_Chiodaroli_co_7_060603071.shtml
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:ENT)

Comment: I have added some of his TV shows with {{tl|illm}}s to those articles that are not yet found on English Wikipedia, and I have added a bunch of {{tl|cite book}}. He is obviously notable and meets both  and . I don't know if it is wise to think one can with ''any'' fairness pass sweeping judgements like "questionably notable and improvable" when one is only capable of finding ''one'' obscure web page and propose that "there's nothing else to suggest this is keepable", when one admits to not have capabilities to search the non-English sources. May I suggest a #1 closure here to avoid further waste of community time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:BASIC||WP:SK)