Deletion of Bernard de Lattre de Tassigny

Comment: I'm probably going to incite some anger or something with this comment, but I feel it still must be said. As great as the sources you've provided are, there is one thing that really bothers me about them: they all are either |trivial mentions or (more frequently) mention his father primarily. Take a look at the title of some of the sources: "FRENCH CHIEF'S SON SLAIN" and "War: Soldier's Son", just to name two that stood out at me. What bothers me is that it seems the only reason he is being noticed is because of his father. If some notable actor's son died at the age of one, you would probably get a lot of sources too, but it still wouldn't be fit for inclusion in an encyclopedia. I am totally in agreement with this information being present in his father's article, and perhaps have this article be a redirect to his father, but I don't think he's deserving of his own article right now as pretty much ''everything'' just seems to mention his death in relation to his father. Fun counterpoint in the interest of neutrality and provoking discussion: Disregarding  right now, are all of these sources sufficient to meet ? Counter-counterpoint: Does that encroach on 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Notability is |not inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)