Deletion of 2010 Austin suicide attack

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  as Ahunt points out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes /CA, this was a crime, so criminal notability standard applies. Special:Contributions/65.92.181.184|65.92.181.184
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I agree that this passes  as an act of protest (or as suicide/terrorism if you please).  It probably wouldn't be notable if it were merely a light aircraft crash - but it was much more than that.  There has been ongoing coverage of the event in the media.  Just recently, the IRS building that was almost completely destroyed was finally re-opened - and there was significant coverage of that in the Austin media reminding people of the event.  GNG requires: "Significant coverage" (check - it was in every mainstream newspaper and other media) "Reliable" (check, sources were reputable news organizations) "Sources" (check, secondary sources are provided in the articles' references) "Independent of the subject" (check, again, news items were not created by the protagonist) "Presumed" (check - we have a 'presumption' that this article is suitable for inclusion and therefore we just need a consensus, which has been established by the large number of editors working on the article and (it appears) by respondents here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Previous deletion discussion dismissed the AfD because of . I don't see how  applies here and doesn't apply Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Norwegian_C-130_Hercules_accident|here. There ought to be a better reason. I don't see how there is "no chance at all" that we delete this minor freak accident article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)