Deletion of List of statistically superlative countries

Comment: per , unclear inclusion criterion. Not to mention ambiguous title: "statistically superlative", what does that mean? Apparently any random subject where a country is in some way exceptionnal is enough. That is too broad in scope, and meaningless altogether. Repeated entries galore! I mean, did you know that China is the country with the largest population? With the largest ethnic Chinese population? The highest proportion of ethnic Chinese in the population? The largest number of Mandarin speakers? The largest number of Cantonese speakers? It's also the largest country in Asia that is not also part of another continent? The country with the largest wild population of pandas? The largest wild population of Chinese alligators? Pick a country, any country, and start counting its "statistical superlatives". You can come up with an arbitrary number of them in no time.--Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: Even though that way of arguing has been contested before,  indeed is the right policy to cite to delete this creation. Because what it means is "List of statistically superlative countries ''under any criterion''", and that's just not acceptable. Please also note the following quote from WP:NOT: "The examples under each section are not intended to be exhaustive.", which is linked to . So it is not the case that excessive statistics would be the only violation that could possibly apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:BEANS)

Comment: Both an excessive list of statistics and |synthesis, because it takes each 'superlative' from its own source and not one source that reliably covers the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: WP:SALAT, detailing the appropriate topics for stand-alone lists, provides that "lists that are too general or broad in scope ... have little value".   also bars "long and sprawling lists of statistics" especially where such lists fail to provide sufficient detail to put those statistics into their proper context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Unencyclopaedic, violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)