Deletion of Matthew Waldman (2nd nomination)

Comment: and nominate Nooka for deletion. A company that needed $90K to stay afloat from an https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/nookrono-chronograph-watches-by-nooka#/ Indiegogo campaign is truly tiny. They also dare call their products chronographs when what they really sell is plastic pieces https://www.google.com/search?q=Nooka&source=lnms&tbm=shop&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiKqajgntTiAhVxuVkKHdAtD0AQ_AUIECgB&biw=1536&bih=750 like this. Both articles do not mention anything negative about either Waldman (failure of his design studio Berrymatch aka apartment in Chelsea) or Nooka which teetered on extinction ever since 2008. These things are in the sources, but not the articles. Also, this company does not maintain sales offices around the world nor does the source support that (it's actually one which speaks of Nooka as a warning for startups). Both pages stink to high heaven of  and/or . And to some extent it worked (one sources tells its readers to learn more about Nooka by reading the Wikipedia page). His claim to fame seems to be he designed a single watch for Seiko once upon a time (before Nooka) which is now being presented as "commisioned work" done by Nooka. Neither Waldman nor his company come anywhere close to notable. The Wikipedia articles do not represent the truth in any objective or balanced manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:VANITY)

Comment: I want to make it clear Msurtees10001 is '''not''' Matthew Waldman, but rather Michael Surtees another wannabe product designer with a passion for horology ("the study of measurement of time" - which I think he equates with having cool watches). I say this with a lot of certainty because of Talk:Nooka. They are both NYC based and definitely know each other IRL. I was unable to ascertain if Surtees worked for Nooka (or maybe he's a backer), but he has been to the office and has spent a lot of time promoting Nooka designs on social media. There's a remarkable amount of pages that mention both names together. Therefore, I posit it is still . Surtees has a whole other vanity website which seems to be dedicated to photos of how awesome his life is, but that's neither here nor there. The point is there is a COI, but it is of second-degree nature, not first degree. I feel these pages have been created to lend credibility to Nooka and Matthew Waldman in whatever fundraising efforts are undertaken. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Merge to me implies that all or even a majority of this content should be migrated to Nooka, but Waldman probably at best deserves a brief section in the article. Per nom, fails to meet notability guidelines. '''Comments''': If Msurtees10001 is indeed who the nominator claims to be, someone should raise the issue on his talk per . Also, {{re|SVTCobra}} I know literally nothing about Nooka, but it was fun to read through such an impassioned rant. Finally, the external link to PingMag which reads "NOOKA: The Info Aesthetics of A Wrist Watch" brings me to an ad for an erectile dysfunction|ED drug, and thus I've restored it to an archive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COICOIN)