Deletion of Chadwick Pelletier

Comment: IMDb cannot be used as a |reliable source, and having notability is having "significant coverage" of a person, which he does not have. Also, it's written like a fansite. "Notable quotes", really? And all these links (now removed) to direct a user to imdb, not even used a reference. No. It's written poorly when he shouldn't have a page to begin with. And why do users Cwick37 and Spycraft7 have the same exact signature effect? Not socking I hope
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: just listing other pages that "own articles here with no issues" is just  and isn't a valid argument in AfD discussions. We're talking about him, not them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)