Deletion of Tom Valentine (2nd nomination)

Comment: Portions of article are copyvios; there are no independent citations from |reliable sources supporting the assertions presented in this article. Two books printed by rather well-known publishing houses get him close to the |notability bar, but perhaps any yet-to-be-found citations might be enough for a new, non-copyvio, non-promotional article can be kept. The best move here is to scrape clean
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Appears to be a borderline case.  I'd have to see sources added to this article before I could vote for a weak keep.  Also, some portions appear to be a  from here http://www.theyogashop.co.uk/shop/manufacturer_info.php?manufacturers_info_id=230, so that problem would have to be cleared up as well.  If these issues aren't resolved within the next few days, I'll be back to vote weak delete.  The books alone, however, since most of them are from legitimate publishers, should be enough to establish notability if their existence can be substantiated
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: Fails  section on authors, but may be notable as broadcaster with improved refs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)