Deletion of Rosalind Franklin, author

Comment: searching Google News Archive for rosalind.franklin+cornwall and rosalind.franklin+diggory yields nada. Unlikely to meet . , in my book, is a pebble to be placed on a scale when it's nearly balanced. The nomination was not the most well-reasoned it could have been, but that doesn't mean we can't proceed on the basis of a good-faith, if fuzzy, nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:COI)

Comment: Let's see here... issues (article creator is the subject), |Wikipedia is not an autobiography, puff piece, , and no |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NOT||WP:RS)

Comment: unless independent and non-trivial |reliable sources can be found to substantiate her |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)