Deletion of Kuzari Principle

Comment: as non-notable. With it's synthesized pro and con arguments and editorial asides, it's somewhere between  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:ESSAY)

Comment: this well-reasoned and important article that's an excellent key to understanding Jewish philosophy and the history and reasons for the Khazars' conversion to Judaism. The article cites  and meets all requirements of ,  and . It is based on and derived from the famous classical book by Rabbi Yehuda Halevi, ''The Kuzari
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:CITE||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: It's badly sourced, it does not meet our sourcing standards. It uses a self-published book for one of its few sources, plus a personal website. It uses no properly published books, no journal articles. It is basically |original research full of what some text doesn't have, 'if this then that' statements, etc. It might make a good essay but it is a bad article. The article is about a 'Kuzari Principle' yet I'm still waiting for evidence not that elements of the argument made in the article are notable, but that this 'principle' with the name it has is notable. Blogs and personal websites and self-published books aren't enough. If it's notable, why hasn't it been mentioned in journal articles, books on Jewish history or theology, etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)