Deletion of Magdalena Zamolska

Comment: Meets  and   guidelines. Article could use expansion not deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCYC||WP:SPORTSPERSON||WP:ATD)

Comment: Passes , she competed at UCI World Championship in 2006 (time trial), and 2008 (road race). She's also Polish champion in two-women time trial (2009) and took the silver in ITT (2006, 2007), bronze in individual road race in 2004, and bronze in ITT (2005). The source is: Bogdan Tuszyński, Henryk Kurzyński ''Leksykon 1466 najlepszych zawodniczek I zawodników w kolarstwie polskim 1919-2015'', ed. Warsaw 2016, p. 464. I'm going to write article in Polish wiki, anyway, as the podium of the national championship is enough there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCYC)

Comment: Fails GNG and BLP and V and RS per Guye.  Also, fails  since all the N claim is one event, and not even a "psedobiography" can be written, here, let alone an  biography. In addition, fails all |other criteria like WP:SPORTSPERSON, WP:NCYC because those merely suggest there could be a "likelyhood" of the proper substantial coverage of this woman's biography but no such GNG RS coverage exists (thus, the likleyhood or "presumption" has failed and is now nothing but unsupported ) and the  is on the keep voters to demonstrate the substantial coverage of her biography does exist, especially where the event occurred several years ago, so such coverage should already exist.  Also, delete per  including not promotion, not directory, and not statistics. Some of the person's statistics info might go to an appropriate list article, per ONEEVENT and LIST, or to a list-in-an-article on notable cycling events
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NPOV||WP:BIO||WP:OR||WP:BURDEN||WP:NOTEVERYTHING)

Comment: In this case, subject meets  (...has actively ''participated'' in '''a''' major amateur or professional competition or won...) per .Also, policy statement per  - ''The article must provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline '''or''' the sport specific criteria set forth below''. I understand nominator's perspective; however this course would better benefit if the guiding laws (legislature) are challenged, as this seems to be an existing debate, instead of the rightful execution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSPERSON||WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT)

Comment: Passes , having competed in a top-ranked UCI event. This seems incredibly  after the nominator started Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#The_criteria_of_WP:NSPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|this. The fact that there is no Polish article is |completley irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCYC||WP:POINTY||WP:OTHERLANGS)

Comment: ping|Piotrus}} I agree with you. Also, NSPORT is not supposed to be a handcuff. It says: {{quote|the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article ''must'' be kept.}} I searched Google with {{small|{{quote|Magdalena Zamolska cyclist -"she represented her nation at the"}}}} to remove '''|mirrors''', and I got pretty much the same info that is in the article right now. There were a lot of '''|passing mentions''', '''|unremarkable coverage''', and '''|self-published sources'''. What's worse, the subject is a '''|living person''', so the |V and |RS standards are much stricter. Fails |GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:MIRROR||WP:MILL||WP:SELFPUBLISHED||WP:BLP||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:passing mentions)