Deletion of 3Dponics Inc.

Comment: I noticed that a number of the references were formatted incorrectly on the page, making an article's author show up as the publisher. Once the correct publisher is added, it looks to me like there is enough secondary  sourcing here to pass . Examples: http://www.metronews.ca/news/ottawa/2014/07/15/from-printer-to-plate-tech-company-gives-gardening-new-dimension.html Metro News Canada, http://hightimes.com/grow/3d-printers-allow-you-to-create-a-custom-pot-garden/ High Times, https://mic.com/articles/121805/you-can-now-3-d-print-your-own-miniature-marijuana-grow-house#.OucLMjDVS Mic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . The tone of the article is advertorial, while the coverage I see is PR or PR-like, indicating that this company has not yet made sufficient impact to warrant an encyclopedia article. Awards listed are trivial and are there for promotional purposes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMO)