Deletion of Jane Collins (politician)

Comment: Once again,  displays its bias against UK & US politicians from outside the main two parties. Under an electoral system that is so firmly first-past-the-post, there are a great many notable politicians who don't get elected. Twenty years ago they were Greens, this year it's UKIP. Her role within the party is, I would suggest, an indication of notability in itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: The sorces are enough to prove notability under  however it does fail 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Many unelected candidates pass  in the sense that there are multiple RS articles about them, but the reasoning, as I understand it, behind  is that if all the coverage is about their candidacy(/ies), then it should be covered by articles on those elections. Are there any sources on this individual beyond election coverage? The only source I can see in the article that isn't election coverage is the last one, and that does not appear to meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:RS)

Comment: Can I ask what "role within the party" you mean? The article says she's a "regional constituency manager", which doesn't seem particularly significant or notable. (Only two Wikipedia articles contain that phrase: this one and Phil Hobson (Welsh LibDem, and has been elected to something), so it's not like Wikipedia is full of articles on regional constituency managers in the main two parties!) Or do you mean that she's top of UKIP's regional list for Yorkshire and the Humber (European Parliament constituency)? I would agree that Collins has a good chance of becoming an MEP, but Wikipedia is a not a  and she isn't an MEP yet. Other list toppers for that constituency don't have articles: there isn't one for Marlene Guest, who tops the BNP list (and the BNP won as many seats as UKIP in that constituency last time), or for Andrew Cooper, who tops the Greens list. What it comes down to for me is that the only reliable source citations given for this person are in the context of candidacies for elections that already have their own articles. We cannot offer "credible, sourced information about topics of note and interest" if there aren't any credible sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)