Deletion of Karen Franklin (2nd nomination)

Comment: good sourcing. per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Regardless of past votes, the current Franklin article is solid. She won awards such as http://books.google.com/books?id=hCQJAE94_SgC&pg=PR9&lpg=PR9&dq=%22karen+franklin%22+award+%22Distinguished+Scientific+Achievement%22&source=bl&ots=jjH9TqP05q&sig=opoE6nKQcV7Uq02LDN6I89oPpVo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=st3UU7mgJsuRyASd7YDYBA&ved=0CGIQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22karen%20franklin%22%20award%20%22Distinguished%20Scientific%20Achievement%22&f=false here and http://www.monettehorwitz.org/awardees.html here. There are numerous reliable references in the http://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/14/us/homophobia-often-found-in-schools-data-show.html NY Times and http://www.psychologytoday.com/experts/karen-franklin-phd Psychology Today (which lists Franklin as an expert) and http://www.npr.org/2011/05/26/136433233/expert-panel-weighing-the-value-of-a-test-for-psychopaths NPR and http://pubrecord.org/torture/9667/casebook-psychologist-ethics/ Public Record. She has a solid research record https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22karen+franklin%22&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C31&as_sdtp= here; this article http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/15/4/339.short here was cited by 206 other studies; she has been published http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15228930801949241 here and http://jiv.sagepub.com/content/15/4/339.short here and many other places. References in https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/witness/201011/rape-victim-should-cheer-rapist-court-says Psychology Today again, in http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/interviews/franklin.html Frontline, also http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/roots/franklin.html another Frontline, plus in the http://articles.latimes.com/1998/oct/14/news/mn-32430 Los Angeles Times and http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/hebephilia-no-its-not-normal-men-have-sex-pubescent-girls-1457092 the IB Times. There are more references in the article. Clearly, Franklin easily passes the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I commented, but did not !vote, in the first AfD.  I think this person passes the  test fairly well by now, but the article itself could use more editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)