Deletion of Axe of the Dwarvish Lords

Comment: to List of major artifacts in Dungeons & Dragons as there are no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate |notability of this fictional artifact outside of Dungeons & Dragons. Six of the seven sources cited originate from the game publishers (TSR and Wizards of the Coast) except one self-published review, which was written by a S. John Ross who has worked for the publishers. The majority of the article is plot summary with a heavy in-universe perspective that fails #PLOT and , which means that this article falls outside the scope of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FICT||WP:NOT||WP:WAF)

Comment: the article has been improved over the course of the last few days and certainly more references could be found. Besides  has never been a reason to delete an article.  I would also accept a redirect but which article would be the best Modules or Artifacts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: If you are not going to take the process here seriously then don’t participate. The Axe my not be the best article here, it may even be worthy of deletion, but the condescending attitudes of some editors here point are more to  than anything else they are trying say
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: and transwiki. No independent sources so fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)