Deletion of Douglas Emhoff (2nd nomination)

Comment: Why would you delete this? He has received significant news coverage and clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Apparently notability standards become irrelevant when exciting things happen in the news. Emhoff is not any more notable today than he was last week, when he was just another |run-of-the-mill attorney married to a U.S. Senator. Per , he is '''not''' automatically notable because his wife ''might'' become Vice President. Is it that hard to wait until November
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: as per previous consensus, and not much has changed since, other than Emhoff is now the spouse of a candidate for a position. I'm not seeing any compelling arguments on the Keep side here, from a strong presence of , 'I came here to find this' (which isn't an argument against deletion in any sense), assuming bad faith and assuming notability due to coverage over the last 24 hours, which can definitely fall to . Emhoff's notability seems to be inherited from his wife being the presumptive VP candidate - I feel like it's a case that we need to wait til November to see if he becomes the Second Lady (or whatever the official term is) until we can recreate this page, as per  given his notability entirely hinges on a future event, otherwise he's just another unnotable Senate Spouse
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:RECENTISM||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: At this point meets . The selection of Kamala Harris has placed the subject in the public eye
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)