Deletion of Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar

Comment: If the information in the article is more usefully included elsewhere, the proper course of action would be a  suggestion and not a deletion request. But surely, that doesnt apply here. Nor does any of the other listed reasons for deletion (-REASON). A "single event in one of the worlds many interactable disputes" can have a standalone article if it meets  and (E). The article meets the above criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGE||WP:DEL||WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: I'm to a great extent confused over deletion rationale provided in here.  deals with biography of a ''person'' notable for a single event; here the topic under discussion is about an "event" not person. The relevant guidelines that could be cited for keep or delete are ,  & . BIO1E doesn't make sense. It happened in 2000, and its continued coverage since then upto this year 2016, if doesn't prove lasting effect I'm not sure what would
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NEVENT||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: Good sources, and overall coverage. has indeed bene discussed widely in both countries and internationally. Book and newspaper sources are available. this covers  and  per the mentioned above reasons
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: no  or  of coverage; tragic, buut single, event with no long term consequences
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Looks like nominator didn't perform , otherwise he could have refrained from using terms like, "intraceable" and "1event notability". Substantial coverage of event after more than a decade by national mainstream sources easily establish  and help topic meet . I've listed some coverage of the event below, which substantiates that the event has , ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NEVENT||WP:INDEPTH||WP:DIVERSE||WP:LASTING||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: per . The accusations could be easily covered in Ilyas Kashmiri
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: obviously impactful, but it has too much crufty, |undue, |soapboxen. I removed a |chunk of bunk
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:SOAP||WP:BOLLOCKS)