Deletion of Becki Ronen

Comment: per  and . There is more coverage available under Becki Walenz, her married name
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: There are several |dedicated references from , especially The Wichita Eagle, The Topeka Capital-Journal, and NPR affiliates. Whether her |notability derives in part from a Beauty contest or not, dedicated pieces from reliable sources = notability = keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Dear '''Admins''' Please sift through this discussion carefully. Please note that the nomination is encompassed by one word, with no attempt to synch it with Wikipedia guidelines. It doesn't get much better after that. None of the Deleters explain how their nominal citings of Wikipedia policy dovetail with the contents of the article. The use them like talismans: 'I mention this in connection with this article, so that means what I'm saying is so.' Other Deleters, in effect, say, 'I don't like this article, out with it.' There's a cultural condescension toward Beauty contests and their entrants at work here. Please don't take this as even a tacit endorsement of said contests. It's simply a plea for intellectual honesty in the matter of this article and Wikipedia's |notability guidelines, which I see as absent in much of the above verbiage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: searches did not turn up the type of in-depth coverage to show they pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)