Deletion of The Boomer Bible

Comment: The book has received reviews from ''Publishers Weekly'' (https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-56305-075-6), ''The Province'' (https://search.proquest.com/docview/267434446/fulltext/B82FDE5DA4E0467DPQ/), ''The Philadelphia Inquirer'' (https://www.newspapers.com/clip/39785427/part_1_of_2/, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/39785444/part_2_of_2), ''Montreal Gazette'' (https://www.newspapers.com/clip/39785474/boomer_bible_gazette_article/), ''North County Times'' (https://www.newspapers.com/clip/39785492/boomer_bible_north_county_times_part_1/), and ''GayToday.com'' (http://gaytoday.com/garchive/reviews/033098re.htm). This meets  and exceeds  criteria #1, having multiple reviews in independent reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Per  two reviews is enough. The article already cites one: https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-56305-075-6 Here's another review (quite negative, so clearly independent), visible via ''ProQuest'': {{cite newspaper|title=Boomer Bible is big bust|last=Crumm|first=David|journal=The Province|date=December 22, 1991|p=C16|url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/267434446/fulltext/B82FDE5DA4E0467DPQ/|quote= Along the way are thousands of Andrew Dice Clay-style jokes that seem determined to offend everyone about everything: Mexicans are called spics a lot; praying is called braying; a communion liturgy becomes a toast; and the opening line of Rock of Ages is recast as: "Rocks of cocaine, crushed for me, Let me wash my mind in thee." Are you laughing yet? Facing this mess could drive thousands of fallen-away Christians directly back to orthodoxy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)