Deletion of Taepyeong Station

Comment: Could an admin or some outside of the debate please close this nom as it is evident consensus has been reached.  A note to every who voted and questioned my motives or me abusing the system, first I want to state that my nomination was in good faith and I am offended that anyone would |question my faith just based on this nom.  Second, I want to point out that there is no policy, guideline, or even an essay that points to there being a limit to the number of articles nominated at once.  AFD says that if you find articles that are similar (which these are) that they can be bundled in the same nomination insomuch that they all have the same problems.  I truly hope that all of you who worked so hard to keep these articles go and expand them and properly source them more than the OR that they are now.  I hold no ill-will towards anyone, I just hope that you all assume the best before you assume the worst.  Good luck editing everyone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)