Deletion of Hadar Goldin

Comment: as Death of Hadar Goldin. I think there's no doubt anymore about the availability of in-depth, sustained coverage of this event. There's also a strong case for the event as a catalyst for "something else of lasting significance" (per ) in that his death and perceived kidnapping resulted in scores and perhaps over a hundred Palestinian deaths in the context of the Israeli military response. (See ''Haaretz'': "http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.608715 Dozens of innocents killed in IDF's 'Hannibal' protocol". ''NY Times'': "Brig. Gen. Michael Edelstein, the commander of the Gaza division, said Thursday in a telephone briefing that most of the casualties in Rafah had occurred in the first hours after Hamas fighters “tried to kidnap our officer and bring him into civilian places." in http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/middleeast/israeli-procedure-reignites-old-debate.html?_r=0 "Israeli Procedure Reignites Old Debate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Violates #NEWS and #INFO.--Special:Contributions/180.172.239.231|180.172.239.231
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Fails , nn versus any one of thousands of deaths since this started
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: See . There is nothing to say about this person that cannot easily be contained in the article on "Protective Edge". The stuff to do with the Hannibal Directive is pretty speculative
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: WP:RECENTISM is what is driving this, and further news reports have pretty much indicated that this is a non-issue. There is no way to objectively assess an individual's impact less than 24 hours after the incident in question, which is exactly what happened here (hence the BLP1E claim, which is accurate). This article suffers from a desire to get information out there without checking it, which is what the news does, not an encyclopedia.  This is exactly why we are , and why we need to not act  when it comes to content. It is not our mission to be a 24-hour news source; we are an information-driven project. This article seems to be illustrating just about every issue WP has in a nutshell. For example, there are a ton of keep votes stating that his kidnapping is important, but since that didn't actually happen, what good are the votes, really? They're based on inaccurate information. If some time had passed before article creation, this AfD wouldn't have even been here, because this article wouldn't be here.  This is simply one incident in an ongoing conflict; it hasn't changed a thing about the overall conflict, and thus it is not noteworthy in WP terms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per nom. Also agree about 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails  if a captive and  if dead. .Died in the war per recent IDF statements. That does not satisfy . No inherent notability for every dead soldier from any one army, as compared to war dead on the other side or in other recent conflicts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BIO)

Comment: WP:RECENTISM, , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)