Deletion of Coffee bean storage

Comment: The topic passes . A secondary choice would be to merge to Coffee bean
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The proper place to merge to would be Coffee. However, Coffee#Storage|that section already exists. It is  out of there. More content and better references would be great, but that's no reason to delete a perfectly reasonable article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: I can't see where this expands on Coffee#Production (especially since most of the article involves how the beans are made) and I'd tag it as  except that it was created a few years ago and wouldn't really qualify for this type of speedy. In any case, I don't particularly see where this merits its own article at this point in time. At the very most some of this could be merged into the main article under a section for "storage" in the production section, if anyone's keen to do that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A10)

Comment: The nomination makes a |vague wave to  without explaining how that is relevant or a reason to delete.  That policy states "Describing to the reader how people or things use or do something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use or do something is not." and so we see that this is a matter of writing style; how one approaches a topic.  This actual topic is notable and so we have plenty of scope to improve the way this topic is written about per |our editing policy.  Here is a selection of sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE||:WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:IMPERFECT)