Deletion of Patrick Krug

Comment: definitely fails , H-21 is a pretty good index but is way so "common
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He's doing good research, especially for a non-PhD-granting university, but I don't see enough evidence for a pass of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: GS citation data is always inflated, so the actual h-index is somewhere lower. Even according to GS, the highest-cited paper has only 82 citations, which for such an active field strikes me as kind of low. The total number of publications (39, with a PhD from 1998, according to the subject's CVhttp://instructional1.calstatela.edu/pkrug/lab/PDF/CV%20for%20website%20v2.pdf), also seems on the low side for such an active field. The CV itself indicates a reasonably successful but fairly ordinary career. No significant awards, no elected fellowships of scholarly societies, no journal editorships, nothing else to indicate passing . Given that, as the nominator notes, this is a  case, the bar should be higher, not lower here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTO)

Comment: per  point 1. It is not the number of publications that makes Krug notable, but the number of citations to his work, which attest to the impact that his work has had on the field of study. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)