Deletion of 2009 Peru earthquake

Comment: As I disagree with  and this article could be useful in the future. I see no reason to delete SparksBoy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: fails  ("Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute sufficient evidence of notability"). I see no evidence that coverage continued beyond a short burst
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per #NEWS.&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per #NEWS and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: It could affect over 700 000 people, ie. have actual real-life effect! Unlike the gazillion pop-idol or 2nd rate footballer articles. Also, if wikipedia is going to keep and maintain non-physical-event articles with unclear evidence of causes and effects with source only in newsarticles referring to gov pr, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2009_cyber_attacks - then this article deserves keeping, too. And no - this is NOT a case of  as this article is lucid and concise. Perhaps merge the articles on Peru earthquakes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)