Deletion of Michele LeBlanc

Comment: Although I dislike vanity articles as much as the next one,  is not a reason to delete. "Likely does not meet WP:N" is not really a good deletion reason either. The nom should specify ''why'' the subject of this article is not notable. If that can be done, I'll happily vote delete, until then I vote '''keep''', because invalid nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: When working |biographies of living persons one has to be extremely diligent in providing |reliable sources that pass all aspects of ... and every sentence be sourced. More importantly there should be a declared  if writing about something with which you have a vested interest. All those concerns aside, the biggest problem here is the violation of Wikipedia:Autobiography since there is no apparent approval by other editors. As presented, the article has no sources and does not declare nor prove notability. Nothing in the article is suported. An IMDB seacrh shows her as having worked as an associate producer on one project.http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2853064/ Her article about herself reads almost like a job resume. This one is really no contest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:COI)