Deletion of Kalungady

Comment: per : ''"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low"''. My search shows it mentioned https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=W7A_AQAAMAAJ&q=%22Kalungady%22&dq=%22Kalungady%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUrZO4g4XmAhUHbFAKHd94DaEQ6AEIMDAB in a book about missionary activities in this area, in https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ifw_AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Kalungady%22&dq=%22Kalungady%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUrZO4g4XmAhUHbFAKHd94DaEQ6AEIKDAA in Indian census records (but not as a census tract), http://www.stationeryprinting.tn.gov.in/gazette/2017/16D-VI-1-A-Sup.pdf in an Indian government gazette, and http://ietd.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/10603/60998/9/10_chapter%202.pdf in a list of monuments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: although I thank FOARP for finding the above refs, none of them indicate what type of location this is. Doesn't appear to be a legally recognized place, but rather some type of congregation or monument. Certainly none of the claims in the article are supported. As I was back in 2017, am completely willing to change to a keep if some valid sourcing showing that it passes  is uncovered, but as of yet, I'm not seeing it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: If this orphan article is deleted now it can be re-created in future if |Reliable sources are found which confirm its existence as a populated place and any other information about it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)