Deletion of Tris Margetts

Comment: fails both  and .  Despite some spectacular refbombing, every reference from a reliable source is about some other subject and not the article subject.  No reliable source cited provides significant coverage of the article subject. The sources we do have demonstrate that this is a studio/touring musician who has worked with some notable acts but is not themselves notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , , and .  Unable to locate significant biographical details in reliable secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Agree with nom, the refs are all about quantity. Moreover, the article is meant to be about a person, but ends up being mostly about a band — entire sections like discography, gig dates (?!), etc. should be deleted, esp. as they replicate content from the band's article (or v.v.). I'd say this calls for . If a new article is to be created (and I'm not saying it should), it should be trimmed down to content that a) is purely about the person, and b) can be supported by RS refs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: or if anyone is concerned about |alternatives to deletion, '''redirect''' to Spontaneous Combustion (English band)). Good gawd, what a |disaster of |fancruft and shameless |refbombing. The person behind this article, GoldDustProspector, has information that could fill up a fansite, but in Wikipedia people must ''qualify'' for inclusion based on the guidelines at . Margetts has indeed had a long career behind the scenes and in conjunction with some famous people, but that does not mean he is notable in himself because his media coverage is actually about them. A little (repeat: A LITTLE) of his personal history can be recounted at the Spontaneous Combustion article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:TNT||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:REFBOMB||WP:NMUSICIAN)