Deletion of Family tree of Confucius in the main line of descent

Comment: The subject itself is notable, as already pointed above. It can be seen as a family tree of a Chinese nobility member. We already have a lots of family trees of the nobility, and this is more important than the most of the List of family trees#Fictional|family trees from here. Again as above "|we don't require sources to be in English" and another aspect is that it is difficult to find in english the informations already provided. That's why I consider that the article shouldn't be deleted, but improved. Regarding the Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Wikipedia is not a genealogical dictionary|WP:NOT we have hundreds (maybe more) Henry III of France#Ancestors|ahnentafeln and family trees scattered across articles and even a Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy|WikiProject. That is a outdated rule that should be abolished. Update: At most we could merge it with the Confucius#Descendants|Descendants section of "Confucius" article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NOENG)