Deletion of Sue Schilling

Comment: I had stepped away from my computer for lunch only to see that during my brief break, the article had reached a no consensus for an AfD, and that it was being resubmitted for deletion, all within a span of 46 minutes. While I will do my best to |assume good faith, it is very hard to accept that this is not just another attempt to undo an AfD that just failed. Can I politely suggest that this AfD be withdrawn and that a period of time &mdash; say several weeks or a few months &mdash; be allowed after the rejected AfD to allow the article sufficient time to be improved to allow the article to better meet the  concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BIO)

Comment: The standard are Wikipedia's, not mine. It's not as if I nominated the article for speedy deletion. The article has already had more than enough time to be brought up to standards, but it wasn't done. It wasn't done for five months. The purpose of an AfD is to use that time to fix an article, not after. There still has been no claim of notability outside of board membership, which does not meet the standards of . The claim during the previous AfD was that the standards didn't exist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)