Deletion of Rafay Baloch

Comment: Multiple instances of significant coverage in a national news publication, per my comments above. Pretty obviously meets . The 'delete' comments aren't grounded in Wikipedia guidelines. If the guidelines are lacking, then propose changes in the appropriate talk pages, but for the purposes of this discussion, it looks like the basic notability requirements are met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this |promotional article (created by a "consultant, marketing advisor, and proud wikipedian"). The claims of the subject's notability are supported by seemingly legitimate sources which, upon close inspection, prove to be trivial and worthless: Mention of name in a myriad-name https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/cc308575.aspx list by Microsoft; one passing mention in a http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30795253 BBC article about bugs; etc. Local sources (such as https://tribune.com.pk/story/816479/the-unsung-achiever-pakistani-tops-lists-of-ethical-hackers-of-2014/ this) provide straight up fawning verbiage, unworthy of sourcing. The subject's a young student. |Give him time and he might make it here yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: no significant coverage in reliable independent sources, and heavily promotional. I agree that  may apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails /. It isn't obvious to me that the sources on the subject are neutral or in-depth enough to easilly deal with these issues. I would consider changing my !vote if these policy issues were dealt with using better sources, but a quick look doesn't find any sources that are obviously better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NPROMO)