Deletion of Vintage Cave Club

Comment: Independent sources in the article seem marginally sufficient to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Articles in ''Honolulu Magazine'' (four pages) and ''Daily Mail'' exceed "routine restaurant reviews" per , providing in-depth coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: I don't usually involve myself with business or restaurant deletion discussions as thus is out of my area. Take my comments with that grain of salt. Since this is listed in visual arts delsort, I want to mention that having a Picasso work (the claim is neither elaborated on nor sourced) would probably fall under . There are plenty of law firms or corporate offices that have original Picassos but that would not make them notable. Giving the article and sources a quick glance and taking into account the comments above, I'd say this is a '''weak keep''' in any case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)