Deletion of Dianna Gernatt Saraf

Comment: fails  as not "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". Wikipedia is not the social pages. Poise and talents don't enter into it, nor does being well-connected or doing well at good schools. While the Gernatt Family of Companies may be recognized among the top producers of crushed stone in the United States, that doesn't make their attorney notable by association. Nor is an award from within the industry "a well-known and significant award or honor" as described in . Donating to politcal campaigns doesn't make a person notable, etc. I could go on about the non-notable details in this bio, but my point comes down to the absence of anything that ''does'' make the person notable by Wikipedia's standards. Where's the significant, interesting or unusual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Does not meet GNG; we can see this another way in the article itself, which fails to mention ''what'' DGS is notable ''for''; what is she known ''for''? Searched SERPS, didn't find much, current "references" do not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Despite the wonderful and even heroic efforts by the article creator to find and incorporate references in what seems to be a thorough and well written biography,  the subject just does not rise to satisfying  at this point in her career
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)