Deletion of Aerican Empire (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not an actual nation, just an organization created for humorous purposes by a bunch of kids. While there has been an attempt to explain notability, the article currently does not have an encyclopedic value. It reads like an advertisement or tourist flyer, rather than examining the organization and its history from a |neutral point of view. The article needs a serious rewrite to be more encyclopedic. It does seem to have enough notability to satisfy , but it just isn't written to Wikipedia's standards. This would be a better fit on Uncyclopedia. If the article isn't rewritten within the scope of this AfD, it needs to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ORG)

Comment: At first blush it seems like an article that is screaming to be deleted, however it has apparently received multiple non-trivial mentions in |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per #INDISCRIMINATE, item 9
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Content disputes are not a valid reason for deletion.  Verifiable references have been given in the article which seem to establish notability.   is not a valid argument.  If you disagree with the manner in which the article is presently written put a clean-up tag on it and work to improve it.  AfD is not the correct venue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)