Deletion of Peter Herrmann (2nd nomination)

Comment: on the grounds that the previous AFD was little more than a month ago. Articles should be given at least a few months to allow potential improvement before renomination. I have no personal opinion one way or the other on this particular article; this is a procedural "vote". I'm citing the third paragraph of  that says sufficient time should be allowed for an article to be improved upon after it has survived an AFD challenge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED)

Comment: does not meet |notability, or does not support a claim for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: On one hand, 17 books counts for something. On the other hand, I found little evidence, in terms of awards or citations, that his work has substantially influenced others. Google Scholar, WOS and Scopus turn up very little in the way of citations. GoogleScholar did give 25 citations of his book with Tausch, "Globalization and European Integration", but on close inspection most of these citations are by Tausch himself. As DGG wrote in the first AfD discussion, Herrmann's books are not widely carried by the U.S. libraries (although I must say that I give much greater weight to citations, h-index, awards, etc. In most universities the decisions about which books to get are made by librarians, not by the respective academic departments). As a test, I have looked up two random Associate Professors in the Political Science department at my university. They both generated substantial number of citations per GoogleScholar (the first one I checked, had citation hits of 144, 113, 83, 59, 25, 21, etc). The second one had citation rates a little lower but still, by an order of magnitude higher than Herrmann. In both cases they authored some books and their CVs listed a bunch of "mid-level" academic honors and awards, such as best book prizes, top/best paper prizes from various conferences, etc. I have not seen anything of the sort mentioned on Herrmann's web site or in the WP article about him. In my view he does fail , and, absent some new information, the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)