Deletion of Evan Kosiner

Comment: Read the article, he had quite a notable career, easily passing .  And references have been found to show he has received coverage, passing  as well.  Either of those things proves notability.  Only nominate articles for deletion if you believe they aren't notable, not because you are suspicious of the creator of the article.  If you have any evidence someone was paid, then bring it to the proper venue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:GNG)

Comment: Changed vote with cleanup, but he's barely 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The http://www.insidetoronto.com/community-story/8722-young-entrepreneur-sees-the-light/ Inside Toronto source looks reliable and independent, and doesn't obviously sound like a promo piece. Elsewhere, a https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Evan+Kosiner%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 news search reveals a few news hits such as this http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/thestar/access/1145291581.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+14%2C+2006&author=Leslie+Ferenc&pub=Toronto+Star&desc=How+do+you+raise+%246%2C000%3F+Try+dancing+the+night+away&pqatl=google this Toronto Star source. Ridernyc, While |paid editing is frowned upon by many editors, it's not specifically disallowed as long as the |conflict of interest and |neutral point of view guidelines are adhered to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:PE||WP:COI||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as |not-notable and |spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:SPAM)

Comment: I have |rewritten this article from scratch using the sources I referred to above. This should make a decision to keep or delete much more obvious
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)