Deletion of Toranjestan Soroush (2nd nomination)

Comment: The coverage is week, but is there. I'd generally vote delete but maybe we should consider . That said, this is just a single bookstore that seems to have gotten a piece about being opened and maybe being closed in local media... rather on the wrong side of GNG I am afraid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:SYSTEMICBIAS)

Comment: In response to the request for a further analysis of sources. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics and GNG. In short,  requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. My analysis of the available references (only 3 of the 4 are available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: I agree with the analysis of sources above, none meet the criteria for establishing notability as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: not enough in-depth coverage to meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)