Deletion of Military cementery number 398 – Bieńczyce

Comment: to List of cemeteries in Poland. It doesn't exist, but that's easy (), which I'll do in a second. We could use Wikiepdia:Notability (cemeteries), and  Wikipedia:Notability (buildings) as well Wikiepdia:Notability (monuments) are failed/red links. Which takes us back to GNG (or Wikipedia:Notability_(geographic_features)#Buildings_and_objects) and I don't see how this one passes - unless we consider it a monument or zabytek of sorts; which I think are notable by the virtue of classification (and per "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and which verifiable information beyond simple statistics are available are presumed to be notable." from the policy cited above). Not that I can find any mentions of this being a monument. Pl wiki does seem to consider all such small cemeteries notable, see :pl:Szablon:Zachodniogalicyjskie cmentarze wojenne z I wojny światowej, through I will see about it, as I've started an AfD there as well for this article. If there is preference for merger, I'd stress that any merger should make room for the entire content of the article 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: http://www.miplo.pl/index.php?&c=294 looks like a wiki, and furthermore gives me no results when searching for "398" or "Bieńczyce" or "Bienczyce" on it. The second source, http://www.cmentarze.gorlice.net.pl/OkregXIcz2.htm has no indication of why it would be notable (no idea who created it and what their credentials are), and in any case has '''one sentence''' about the cemetery: "It was a single tomb of an Austrian soldier, located at ul. Makuszyńskiego and closed in the fifties during the widening of the street." (Google translate). The third and final source is a maphttp://www.mapakrakow.pl/?ir=2&przystanek=Makuszy%C5%84skiego&lang=pl, not information about the cemetery. The "references", more of a further reading, contain again one of the three sites above, and then ''one'' book by an amateur-historianhttps://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Frodyma. So in total, we have at most one reliable(?) source of unknown detail about this cemetery, not multiple reliable sources as needed by  and as claimed in the keeps above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)