Deletion of Tammie Souza

Comment: Other things exist and big numbers are indeed big, but biographies of living persons have an obvious and serious possibility of harm to the subject. With no |significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, we should not have an article on this person. Working in a certain industry doesn't change that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: After using essays to disparage other's opinions, the nom involves in  arguments. No sale. A 3 4-timehttp://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/nov/01/010000/na-wtsp-forecasts-to-take-new-direction/ Emmy#Regional_Emmys|Chicago Emmy winner is a pretty big deal. Notability for a few dozen million in a major section of the United States is just as worthy as notability for 300 million. Guideline does not mandate "national" or "global" coverage. It does encourage a BLP ro be as comprehensive as possible, so an announcement that she was hired to perform her asserted profession is required erification per guideline. And the  does not state the significant coverage in reliable sources be of some eart-shaking importance, so coverage of her continued work with children also is proper per guideline. She meets the  and  despite 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I think it's worth pointing out that the above IP editor has made 18 edits to Wikipedia and 14 of them are concerning Tammie Souza. 2 of the others are arguing about journalists in the TV project and one is for an AfD of another Tampa area anchorman. I know I should , but I'm starting to suspect a  or worse
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:COI)