Deletion of List of New Gods

Comment: Obscure topic which does not meet the . Special:Contributions/122.60.173.107|122.60.173.107
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to New Gods in the spirit of ; the underlying topic is indisputably notable, and redirects are cheap
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: or '''Move to List of New Gods characters''' - I was tempted to vote "Keep" because of how ridiculously notable the New Gods (and their pantheon) are, even on the simplest of  tests. But on second thought, there's no reason a less wordy version of this list can't be covered on the main page. However, if we move the page, it will need to be edited, expanded, and rewritten because of the poor writing
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: as these characters are already covered in their own article, and there is no additional content to make this independently notable as stated in the . I would accept some kind of section in the main article linking to the notable characters, for navigation purposes, but this is already covered in the template
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Excuse my frankness, but can anyone here cite an actual policy-based reason for outright deletion? As both myself and {{u|Rorshacma}} have pointed out, even the simplest of  tests will bring up coverage pertaining to New Gods characters (which in itself is an influential comic book property). Aside from that, there is a |"But the article is not well sourced" vote, a vote citing that vote, and a couple of others that seem tentatively in favour of a redirect/merge, but maybe not really
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NEXIST)