Deletion of Canadian Cartographic Association

Comment: I was also going to mention the academic journals published by those societies. The journals pass   since they have impact factors (criterion 1.c). But then I learned about , which backfired. So maybe the articles about the societies should be merged into the articles about the respective journals? Again, I still think it'd be better to expand  so that it reflects the usual lenience towards scholarly societies, especially the ones with national scope. Otherwise, I expect mass incineration in :Category:Learned societies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALS||WP:INHERITORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: I had the impression that  gives a break for national scholarly societies, but now I can only source this: ''"When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education."'' Maybe it's time to expand the org. notability guideline, otherwise 90% of existing articles in :Category:Learned societies will have to go. I also found this related excerpt in : ''"6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:NACADEMIC)