Deletion of Betty Furuta

Comment: Presumably, the applicable standards are otability (academics) or . The BLP has only just been started, but it looks to me from the links that can be accessed above that the article could be revised and sourced as to meet those standards on multiple counts. It is worth noting that this nomination appears to be further spillover of edit warring by the Special:Contributions/46.7.236.155|46.7.236.155 at Gaman (term) that has already spread to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:RSN)

Comment: subject has received passing mention in several non-primary |reliabe sources however in those reliable sources the subject has not received |significant coverage therefore the subject is not notable as defined by  or . The subject of this AfD has http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Betty+Furuta%22#sa=N&tbm=bks&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Betty+Furuta%22&ei=gS98UZbnIsTL2QWk4IFY&ved=0CFAQ9AgwBg&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.b2I&fp=96e2fd32583e2168&biw=918&bih=768 written two books, that being said the subject does not appear notable as defined by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:AUTHOR)