Deletion of The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media

Comment: with possible redirect to Lila Rajiva.  Content of article is possible copyvio (from amazon.com), thus not to be merged.  I'm not sure what the Wikipedia:Notability criterion are for non-fiction books, but #People still alive would seem to indicate that it is a print run of "5,000 or more", or possibly even a smaller print run with a readership of 5,000 or more (multiple readers through library distribution
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: certainly and I don't expect anyone to do that. I just wanted to point that out to get others to keep a look out on the massive amounts of pages he keeps making so that none of his  edits get through before he is banned/blocked
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Notable writer, made articles for CounterPunch and wrote a book. They are stalking me and AFD every article i creat that is mildly relevant to the 9/11 Truth movement, and now, they have gone so far that they are AFD'ing article that are not even relevant to the 9/11 Truth movement, but solely since i created them. Further, the block threats are bogus, they have nothing that big on me, they just hate my edits. Also, how in the world does this article has anyting to do with ? Another bad faith arguement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: to Lila Rajiva. Incidently, Amazon.com is copyrighted, so is the Amazon.com book review also protected? I too want to say that the nominator should not focus on the creating editor, but rather the content of the article. Focus on the user somewhere else, not on fD|AfD
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)