Deletion of Gengar

Comment: There are some passing mentions, usually of weak reliability (and worse), but no . I will note that the target list has a note column which can absorb whatever elements of the current reception anyone thinks are notable and reliable. We could add something from https://psyarxiv.com/3behp/ but it's a pre-print so I am not sure it meets  yet
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:MEDRS)

Comment: all the sources in the article are really listicles and/or don't give the necessary depth of coverage. As for the Keep !votes above, the first is simply  and the IP did provide several sources, though a lot of them also have issues with depth of coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE)

Comment: to List of generation I Pokémon as a useful search term. Wikipedia:Bombardment|Refbombed article does not have sources with |significant coverage, just a collection of passing mentions
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)