Deletion of List of Total Drama characters

Comment: or merge - List of Total Drama characters largely is original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors after received 25,000+ edits. This AfD was mentioned at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=575272059#Pages_with_the_most_revisions Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard The pages' 25,365 edits presently ranks it No. 7 behind George W. Bush 45,254, List of WWE personnel 38,061, United States 32,242, Wikipedia 32,031, Michael Jackson 27,023, and Jesus 26,546.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Database_reports/Pages_with_the_most_revisions&oldid=575151844 It seems clear that review is needed when the edit count of an animated television show ranks among articles whose large receipt of edits is understandable. When you additionally look at the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Database_reports/Pages_with_the_most_revisions&oldid=575151844 articles with the most revisions listed below List of Total Drama characters, List of Total Drama characters clearly stands out as unexplainably receiving so many page edits. Yes, the page needs trimming/cleanup of the cruft, but that merely skirts past the problem. With 25,365 edits to the page, I think the culture that has developed in editing this page is so engrained that the page is hopelessly irreparable. In other words, while the article is fixable, reality is that it will not happen. The results after 25,000+ contributions to the page show that the page is being editing with little concern in posting Wikipedian original analysis or in using the Total Drama television itself to source the entire article and/or large passages. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. See . For the page content that is not original analysis, it appears that Wikipedia is being used as a first reporter of Total Drama characters statistics. Even though this is the first AfD for the list,  seems an appropriate solution given the above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS||WP:TNT)

Comment: a valid  of the main article; trimming/cleanup of the cruft |should have been attempted by the nominator prior to tossing it to the AfD wolves
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: fails |the general notability guideline as no evidence has been provided which demonstrates that the characters are notable by our standards. |Notability is not inherited from the work in which the characters appear in. Also violates |What Wikipedia is Not due to the inuniverse only content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: helpful and useful information here, just needs some improvement with secondary sources, however, . Cheers, &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP)