Deletion of Ad-Up (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article still reads like advertising or a business directory entry; to my mind this is an independent ground for deletion, whether or not sources exist: the article still needs to be rewritten from scratch.   The quality of the sources seem highly debatable; two are general puff pieces about banner advertising, in which a member of this firm was one of several similarly situated people interviewed.  The third seems to be an entry in a directory of online advertising businesses that specifically does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: does not meet  and blatant , and the very fact that this is being argued so strenuously by what appear to be company reps only helps underline just how non-notable this company truly is.  If the company were notable, the existence (or not) of a neutral POV article on Wikipedia would be a matter of no concern to them  whatsoever!  The reaction to the original deletion and this AfD only underlines how desperate this company is to (ab)use Wikipedia for free advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:COI)

Comment: Rewritten article has improved with references but they do little more than verify the company's existence.  Notability is still the issue and this clearly fails . &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)