Deletion of Sleeping in United States Congress offices

Comment: per , not having ''independent'' notability. Not a viable redirect term - why would someone come to an ''encyclopedia'' to research something like that? https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Sleeping_in_United_States_Congress_offices Very low page views outside of the days of initial creation all but confirm this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Doesn't appear to be significant. , plus 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NEVENTS)

Comment: per . The fact that it's a thing some congresspeople have done is ''not'' the same thing as it being a notable ''concept'' in its own right. If a bill actually gets put forward, then ''that'' might well be an appropriate article topic — which could then briefly address this by way of background — but that doesn't mean this needs its own standalone concept article separately from that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Just because it's newsworthy, it doesn't become notable.No redirect. Also  the original author
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)