Deletion of Post–Turing machine

Comment: to Turing machine.  This doesn't seem to be a term that's in use (at best I found some lecture notes; Google Scholar gives zero).  The history of the Turing machine is somewhat convoluted, including improvements from Post, which seems to be the gist of what's here, so maybe it's a  in order to try to include Post's name in what's typically just called a "Turing machine" to give him more credit. But what's here is overly technical and goes well into  territory.  In any case, what's here cannot stay.  I wouldn't really be opposed to a delete either, but in case there's anything in here worth saving/merging, I wouldn't mind skipping that part. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:OR)

Comment: Per  and  because the article has 253 items linking to it (in all namesapaces) and 220 of those are from articles. Also, the content of the article is included on a non-media-wiki wiki with the statement "This article's content derived from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (See original source)," found at this https://infogalactic.com/info/Post%E2%80%93Turing_machine| Infogalatic article. I noticed that the nominator tagged the article with the "advert" template (I agree that it reads like a research paper, but I have found no promotional material within the article), and 3 minutes later made this deletion request. The article definitely needs extensive cleanup for tone, but this can't happen if the article is deleted. I feel like applying the "research paper" template and giving contributors time to make the edits would be far more appropriate. I also noticed that the creator of the article wasn't notified about the deletion nomination, so I will be doing that shortly. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP||WP:MANYLINKS)