Deletion of May 2016 Dürümlü bombing

Comment: Passes . The article reports the facts. I suppose NPOV could be argued as 'one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter', but the event is notable and meets the criteria at . Any NPOV concerns can be addressed on the article's talk page (although personally I see no problem with the article as written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: All the sources are Turkish. Turkey has no journalistic freedom (see Censorship_in_Turkey#Censorship_of_the_media and Media_of_Turkey), with the media being well known for having a deep anti-Kurdish bias and making blatantly false statements. (again, see Media_of_Turkey. This is repeatedly confirmed there, if confirmation was needed). Hence none of those sources can be regarded as , especially in regards these matters. There is also one Kurdish source used, but the article states that the source says the exact opposite of what the source ''actually'' says. As for notability... Why is it notable? If it was, as the Kurdish source (which is used to confirm the '''exact opposite of what it states''') is to be trusted (though it is, to be fair, also biased. In the other direction), then this was '''not''' a bombing, but an '''accidental''' explosion. Why would that be notable? (also, I'd say that , which
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTNEWS)