Deletion of Charles Goldstuck

Comment: I cannot access the bloomberg article - perhaps you could summarise what is said about Goldstuck? From the snippets I have managed to find culled from the article, it appears that the article relies on an interview with Goldstuck or a series of quotations at the very least. This *may* be considered a PRIMARY source and *may* not be considered allowable for the purposes of establishing notability. Your second reference from billboard.com notes that Goldstuck was awarded with an award as follows: ''"The Spirit of Life Award, the highest honor bestowed by City of Hope, is presented annually to individuals who have made a notable contribution to their community and profession."'' According to , a person meets the criteria if the person ''has received a well-known and significant award or honor''. The award does not appear sufficiently notable to merit its own article here, nor is there any mention of the award in the City of Hope National Medical Center article so it does not appear to me that the award meets the criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Subject of article fails primary notability requirements such as ,  and . Furthermore, references provided in the aforementioned article do not substantiate the articles claims or subject in any way. Almost as if the article's creator is entirely oblivious of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies as regards establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO)