Deletion of National Centre for Excellence

Comment: per  #2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: as per Wikipedia:All high schools can be notable|essay all high schools can be notable and |NSCHOOL
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL)

Comment: ping|Primefac}} At what ground you are saying that this school is not notable? Well, according to Wikipedia:All high schools can be notable|Wikipedia all high schools can be notable and this article can be kept as per |NSCHOOL and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools)|NSH which say, ''Articles on high schools and secondary schools, with rare exceptions, have been kept when nominated at Articles for Deletion except where they fail verifiability''. If the |verifiability is the reason behind your nomination then there are several reliable resources on the internet that can tell you that it is notable as well as exist physically; please have a look at http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/School-shuts-shop-leaves-kids-in-the-lurch/articleshow/12310827.cms this TOI article, https://web.archive.org/web/20141216060314/http://cbseaff.nic.in/cbse_aff/schdir_Report/AppViewdir.aspx?affno=830194 CBSE Affiliation confirmation and another http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Search&Key=TOIBG/2008/07/25/4/Ar00402.xml&CollName=TOI_BANGALORE_ARCHIVE_2006&DOCID=515281&Keyword=%28%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3ENational%3Cand%3E%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3ECentre%3Cand%3E%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3EExcellence%29&skin=pastissues2&AppName=2&ViewMode=GIF TOI article published in the newspaper that proves that this school is notable. I'm not sure if it can be considered to reliable but the facts and information can be verified from http://www.bangaloreschools.net/2009/10/17/national-centre-for-excellence-malleshpalya-bangalore/ here. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL||WP:V)

Comment: per Rahulmdinesh above.  There is a serious lack of independent coverage here. The first ref is entirely trivial. The second is simply a rote registration and per  it's not encyclopedic for an organisation to simply ''exist'' and no more than that. Also see .  The third ref was a bit more substantial, a comment on a very small school that appears to have closed suddenly and disappeared with the money. However that's two years old (if it were really notable I'd expect to see later coverage too) and Rahulmdinesh points out that it's not even the same school
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:NOTDIR)