Deletion of Naveed Anwar

Comment: Fails  and . I searched Google, JSTOR and various newspaper databases for sources but only found . Notability is not inherited and he hasn't received enough coverage to be notable. The Star Phoenix article mentioned above is speculation about Anwar affecting a riding's election result but I think that shows notability for the riding result, not Anwar. Also, the PAHerald article sourced above might give notability to the company Anwar founded, but not necessarily to him. I would change my !vote if I found a profile about him or if he was elected to public office
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: We long ago deprecated the idea that every leader of a political party was automatically handed an "inherent" notability freebie just for existing, without regard to his sourceability or lack thereof. The standard is now that leaders of political parties who are ''not'' also actual MLAs need to clear  on their ''sourcing'', which is a significantly higher bar than just being able to verify that they exist — rather, the requirement is to demonstrate the ''significance'' of his leadership, not just the fact of it, and this article isn't doing what's needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and expand. As an incumbent leader of Saskatchewan Liberal Party, he passes . Enough credible media citations are available in the Google News
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Local/regional party executive fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)