Deletion of Leaning Tower of Nevyansk

Comment: The thing is that with no english sources - the ones you linked to also appear to be all Russian sources, inclusion of them involves a certain level of  that being said, I'd agree with the prior two suggestions to '''merge''' with Nevyansk
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Clearly notable 18th century building, which would be obviously notable whichever country it was situated in. Once again, we have editors who don't understand what OR is (a tiresomely increasing problem). Translations of foreign material do ''not'' fall into this category. Please actually bother to ''read''  (or even the "this page in a nutshell" section) before you cite it. It really doesn't say what you think it does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Firstly, our policies and guidelines do not and have never banned articles because their source material "appears to be primarily a translation of Russian material" or ''any'' language's material.  The writing of articles that are based primarily on non-English reliable sources is ''encouraged'' - See Wikipedia:Systemic bias.  It's hard to imagine such a monument in the United States or United Kingdom even being considered for AfD.  Plenty of sources available in Russian or otherwise.https://books.google.com/books?id=8_HFBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA72&dq=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o2MYVbrBNsyYgwSZ6IOgBA&ved=0CDsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=ka2SBlJtawkC&pg=PA158&dq=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o2MYVbrBNsyYgwSZ6IOgBA&ved=0CEoQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=9ewDAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA212&dq=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o2MYVbrBNsyYgwSZ6IOgBA&ved=0CFIQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=T3rfAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA68&dq=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o2MYVbrBNsyYgwSZ6IOgBA&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=qT1qAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA208&dq=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=o2MYVbrBNsyYgwSZ6IOgBA&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=Rr6_BAAAQBAJ&pg=PT55&dq=%22Nevyansk%22+%22leaning+tower%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YWYYVYqoGPWCsQTPnIKoBg&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Nevyansk%22%20%22leaning%20tower%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=X7UdAQAAMAAJ&q=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&dq=%22%D0%9D%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%BD%D1%8F%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=9WUYVbvrILT7sASIt4D4Ag&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBjgK.  Secondly, by the nom's statement "No reliable sources in article" indicates a complete lack of following 's .  It took me seconds to find these sources. As  states, if "adequate sources ''do appear to exist'', the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:BEFORE)