Deletion of Alma-Atinskaya

Comment: since this is due to open next year, it or at least the railway is presumably already under construction.  That is substantial enough not to be caught by , in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: A lot of things wrong with this. Firstly,  applies to ''unverified'' speculation.  Even ''verified'' speculated topics can have articles.  But in this case, it actually is verified. http://www.radiovesti.ru/articles/2011-07-30/fm/7248.  To boot, it is long-standing practice that rail stations are considered notable and, in addition to the aforementioned article, http://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/20111129145516.shtml this other one lends the topic to passing even the letter of WP:GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)