Deletion of Henry Lin

Comment: fails  at the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: as has had significant coverage in reliable sources such as the Boston Globe article, smithsonian, time magazine (all in the article) and therefore passes  which overrides WP:ACADEMIC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Even if article does not meet WP:PROF criteria, it probably meets the  criteria. There appears to be significant reliable coverage not included in the article: e.g., a second article from the Boston Globe that prominently features lin https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2016/02/17/test-for-creating-family-tree-for-aliens/QgOSDtc6e0Dz3ri6gABy8H/story.html Boston Globe. Gizmodo has also features him twice http://gizmodo.com/astrophysicists-find-that-cities-grow-just-like-galaxie-1680462544 Gizmodo 1 http://gizmodo.com/how-we-could-find-aliens-by-looking-for-their-pollution-1597039477 Gizmodo 2. As for Astrojimmy's concern an http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+henry+lin/0/1/0/all/0/1 arXiv search lists him as 1st author for 6 publications including all the ones that have gotten media attention, suggesting that the academia gods give him the credit  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/128.103.224.4|128.103.224.4
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON. Does not have the coverage for GNG, and does not have the publications/influential work for . Might have, fairly soon; can be recreated then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The subject may not meet , but that is irrelevant because the subject does meet  at this time. Some sources are below
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Off to a good start, but does not yet meet rof; oo soon. Not enough in-depth independent sources for GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: He doesn't pass , and the 30-under-30 coverage of him specifically is very weak, but we have nontrivial stories about multiple pieces of research he did (alien pollution and panspermia, to name two) that have made a splash in the popular media. I think that may be enough to pass  and to be safe from 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)