Deletion of Yogendra Puranik

Comment: City Councilors are not included in . But here, there is enough for . Being first - while is not a part of any guideline, but if it's big enough to generate substantial interest of media, it can help
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: A bit of procedural business first: it's certainly bordering dishonest by the nominator to state that the entire thing is the subject's autobiography; the article was originally created by {{u|Pharaoh of the Wizards}}, and {{u|Basil the Bat Lord}} cleaned up many of the self-inserts that the subject put in. The nominator suggests that "over 90% of the article" is self-edited; https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/Yogendra%20Puranik/ a 2 second search disproves that suggestion. And of course, while 52% authorship is still pretty bad as far as  goes, it's not necessarily a -worthy amount. The COI authorship will also go down considerably when all of the uncited bits are removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:TNT)

Comment: passes  .There is  a lot of coverage in the Indian Media all major newspapers have covered him as he is the "first Indian elected in Japan". Have added references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)