Deletion of Definitions of pogrom (2nd nomination)

Comment: I was notified on my User Talk a few days about this, and I decided to wait and see if there might be new perspectives I hadn't thought of before commenting here.  But, the same arguments that took the previous version of this article to Delete still stand.  Fundamentally, , which is policy, still applies.  Making an article out of numerous  violations doesn't solve the issue.  I thought briefly about suggesting the article be renamed to List of definitions of pogrom but per  the individual list items have to be generally worthy of their own Wikipedia articles, and again per  there cannot be individual articles for each of the items in this list.  As I mentioned last time, this is an interesting list of sources, but it's not suitable for a Wikipedia article.  If this comes back again for a third time I'm afraid I'd have to recommend ing the target
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICDEF||WP:NOTDICDEF||WP:LIST||WP:DICDEF||WP:SALT)

Comment: or '''Transwiki'''.  I agree with Bearian.  Even if it's |useful, it's not encyclopedic.  Definitions belong on Wiktionary, and Pogrom already has a perfectly workable definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSUSEFUL)