Deletion of Life Is Real Only Then, When 'I Am'

Comment: I found three scholarly texts{{emdash}}two that cite the book, and one which makes a passing reference to it. There are other books that briefly mention the book, such as https://books.google.com/books?id=OsymN8xXi-IC&pg=PA239&dq="Life+Is+Real+Only+Then,+When+'I+Am'" this one. Otherwise, the subject does not seem to meet any of the five criteria of , and only would meet  if we counted the many trivial mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG)

Comment: As of right now there is no page on the trilogy and if it's ever proven that the trilogy is notable enough for an entry, this can always be changed to redirect there. That said, I can't find anything to show that this specific book ultimately passes notability guidelines. It exists and it is an official part of the trilogy, but notability is not automatically granted by a book's existence () or by the potential notability for the series or the notability of the author (). This is a fairly common issue with trilogies in general and with fringe works in specific. Most times when fringe works receive coverage it's almost always in places that ''Wikipedia'' does not consider to be reliable. I know that reliable sources usually translates to "mainstream" (at least in comparison to the topic at hand) and that mainstream sources tend to ignore works like this. However at the same time Wikipedia still requires those reliable sources and this site cannot be expected to help give exposure to something that has at this time not received coverage in RS. Until a page on the trilogy comes about, I think that the best option here would be to redirect to the specific section highlighted above, since it does mention this work and the trilogy
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS||WP:NOTINHERITED)