Deletion of Alfred Hartemink

Comment: mdash; Per http://www.isric.org/NR/exeres/AF1A2D1C-A4C9-441C-8EFB-D623775453FD.htm ISRIC profile, subject may have sufficient notability.  However, as written, the article is does not meet Wikipedia standards.   is a concern.  The article's sources need to be independent of the subject. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: The subject '''does''' appear to be notable, per |Wikipedia's criteria on biographies and |Wikipedia:Notability. His papers are used as cited sources, so it would pass the notability criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTE)

Comment: Meets  based on his http://www.alfredhartemink.nl/publications.htm| published work. Almost meets  but no independent bios or independent articles on him.  is an issue but the article seems to be very neutral unlike most  issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:COI||WP:COI)

Comment: He appears to pass  and WP:BIO, as "His publications include 5 books and many papers in internationaly refereed journals".  This should be enough to pass all relevant notability policies.  It should be reviewed by an experienced editor to remove possible conflicts of interest and POV|POV, however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NPOV)

Comment: No offense to Mr. Hartemink, but I totally think that if we keep ignoring  like this it will have a grave impact on the neutrality of Wikipedia. Whether or not he did a good job in regards to NPOV it is irrelevant. Nor is whether he meets . Both can probably be answered in the affirmative. But if  is never enforced, what's the point of having  in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:BIO)