Deletion of MBG Expense Management

Comment: No |secondary sources provided. --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I've looked at the references, which are enough to make me strike my "speedy A7" !vote above. But what we have is (1) the company has passed an audit (2) report of a press release (3) it's a founding member of a trade association (4) it has organised a survey - statement from the director of marketing.  I don't find that really up to the standard of  which says "''Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability.''" and excludes "''Press releases... and other works where the company... talks about itself—whether published by the company... itself, or re-printed by other people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: per #G11
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)