Deletion of List of InuYasha terms (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is what  is all about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: I'm surprised this survived deletion the first time around. This is obvious, non-notable |fancruft. In fact, a significant number of these terms are actually just translations; I'm pretty sure ''baka'', ''Itadakimasu'', and ''oni'' aren't specific terms from Inuyasha
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: I see nothing to indicate why the previous AFD only 6 months ago, which was close to a |snowball keep, should be overturned. The nom, similarly, has not explained why the previous decision should be ignored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per #IINFO, #DIRDEF, and . Most of the vocabulary term's really isn't particular or special to the universe of ''InuYasha'' and much of it can apply to any anime or manga. That means that the list is indiscriminate. The list also has a bias towards the Japanese/fansub/scanlations terms instead of the terms used by Viz Media, which holds the English languages distribution rights for both the anime and manga. This means that the list doesn't maintain a |neutral point of view. The previous AfD's result has no bearing on the current AfD, especially when it was closed by a non-admin using disputable logic. And AGAIN is not a valid argument to summarily keep an article. I generally do not see list of terms as being helpful to the reader, and such lists are often attempts to make the article look more informative then it really is. The only exception I would make is when the meanings of the terms are so complex, and it is impractical to explain them in a summary or character description
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:DICTIONARY||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTAGAIN)