Deletion of Xabasha Wacle

Comment: WP:NGEO says ''This guideline specifically excludes maps and census tables from consideration when establishing topic notability, because these sources often establish little except the existence of the subject.'' That's all we've got here: dots on maps, entries in databases which are basically the same thing and listings in census-like surveys. And we have to use a fair bit of |original research to get that far
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This doesn't sound like it even meets , which is a bright-line requirement. Hydronium cites two sources, one which says, ''approximately 1000'' population, the other says, ''30-180 households''.  Unless we're talking 10-person households, at least one of those is wrong.  Or, maybe 10 person households really are the norm there.  But, none of this sounds very -ish to me.  Better to omit something than to make things up because they sound good
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: Further to my original comment which still stands, I am !voting a clear delete, citing complete lack of verifiability. There have been several weak keep !votes, however none of these editors have identified or clearly used any reliable source(s) which confirm the existence of this place. It is ''possible'' that it exists, and original research conducted here has found a few mentions in very unreliable sources, with no clear attribution and conflicting facts. In my view this article fails the core policy requirement of verifiability, i.e 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)