Deletion of Trey Scott Atwater

Comment: Clear example of   event itself doesn't warrant an article either per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: or '''Rename to incident''' - the incident might be notable; |the person is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Run-of-the-mill person in the news for only one thing is what  is designed to prevent.  Nothing particularly notable about the incident itself either.  Women walk into shopping mall fountains, flight attendants get drunk and swear and quite their job, a judge gets recorded beating his daughter (I could link to all those AfDs that resulted in a delete), but I do not have the time/inclination) ... All are interesting news blips that the drive-by media screams about for a few days while waiting for another missing white woman syndrome|white woman to be kidnapped.  We're not a newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Rather than a "rescue" tag, this article needs a "NOTNEWS violation" tag as we read "This brought him international press coverage" (and a Wikipedia article!). He played football, he joined the army, he was admonished, he was arrested—delete and recreate ''after'' something encyclopedic becomes available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: If someone thinks that an article about the event surpasses , they can write that article. But what this person did does not meet the exceptions for , and at this point the person hasn't even been convicted of a crime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Seems that  and  applies here.  There may be significant credible coverage but and that makes the event |notable not the person.   probably precludes an article about the event at this point, but as this unfolds it may be worth writing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG||WP:RECENT)

Comment: I'll  repeat here almost  exactly what  I  had already  said on  the article talk  page: As its stands, this article is not strictly a biography. It  is more about  two  closely  related events concerning  a member of the US armed forces carrying  explosives on civil  aircraft. The ''article'' possibly  passes  -  but  does its human subject? No. Is there a case for deleting per  , , and #NEWSREPORTS and/or ?  Yes. Is there a case for an article about  military  people carrying  explosives in  civil  aircraft? Possibly, but  but  as Qwyrx says, someone should write it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:UNDUE||WP:NOT||WP:RECENT)

Comment: This is a textbook violation of . I see no reason why the incident should be presumed to have any lasting notability, so it also doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)