Deletion of Twincest

Comment: I think the article needs significant improvement (mostly further research and sourcing), but how is this .  A Google search of http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=twincest+-wikipedia twincest excluding Wikipedia gives '''over 80,000 hits'''.  Also, it's not just a dicdef as it gives real-world cultural references (I find the Balinese example to be particularly noteworthy as it's non-fictional and sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per .  Seems like cruft as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Not a single source given uses the term. Now, if someone wanted to write an article entitled "Incest among twins" or something similar that might be encyclopedic- it would still have  issues but that might be able to be dealt with. So if this isn't deleted, I woudln't object to rewriting the intro and moving it to something like that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)