Deletion of Costa Concordia disaster

Comment: This  NEWS article seems to have been created in ''anticipation'' of its notability i.e. with the expectation that it will meet inclusion guidelines, before the duration of coverage or any lasting effect is certain, see . Once you get pass the hyped up "Titanic" comparisons (groan), the facts of the event as described in the original Costa Concordia article are adequate. Nothing suggests that it is (at this stage) independently notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BREAKING||WP:ANTICIPATION)

Comment: Clearly passes  notability criteria because it has enduring historical significance as the largest passenger ship grounding in history with at least six human fatalities and hundreds of millions of euros of vehicle damage, and meets the general notability guideline with 14,200+ Google News hits already. As a developing current event on the front page ITN, the article is already several kilobytes larger than the section of the article it was split from
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: I'd rather see the section in Costa Concordia rewritten as a  and linking to this event.  This event is notable and will have long lasting effects.  Putting all of this into the Costa Concordia would effectively repurpose that article for this event by sheer |weight.--v/r
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Although ill be accused of crystal balling and i am too a small degree the incident is clearly significant meets  and over the coming days this article will be greatly expanded as more info comes to light and will very likely be too big to fit in the main article Something as significant as this should have its own article. It will have basis on the future of the industry as its looked into why safety measures which are used industry wide failed. OH and does meet }} In its own right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: and rewrite the section on the main article per . This is only going to get bigger as more facts are established - the largest passenger vessel to capsize isn't a slow news day filler piece. Quite possibly this is the most significant incident involving a passenger vessel in European waters since the MS Herald of Free Enterprise|MS ''Herald of Free Enterprise'' capsized in 1987. I know this final comment is crystal ballery, but the comments I'm reading on the BBC News about their not having been a lifeboat drill and the difficulty in launching the lifeboats mean there is a high chance of this having significant consequences within the cruise liner industry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: This article is at the size where a standalone one on the incident is appropriate and desirable. Having this much information squeezed into the main article about the ship would be |undue coverage of this accident in relation to the ship itself. See .http://www.webcitation.org/64hUoMVwJ "Foundering of Italian cruise ship raises safety worries" from ''The Miami Herald'' and http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2012/01/14/will-titanic-like-images-from-italy-change-behavior/ "Will Titanic-Like Images From Italy Change Behavior?" from ''Forbes'' describe the economic implications of the grounding and illuminate the magnitude of this incident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:WHENSPLIT)