Deletion of Newsrail (2nd nomination)

Comment: for three reasons: 1) Reliable sources are not necessarily notable themselves. Some examples would be individual scientific papers, user manuals, press releases or government reports - some of them might indeed be notable, but in general they will not be. 2) There are currently no reliable sources cited in the article (one is a journal directory, the other is the journal's own website), so it doesn't even pass GNG.  states that being archived by the NLA is a necessary but insufficient criterion.  3) This article has no reasonable prospect of expanding very much beyond its present two-sentence stub status, and thus would be far more appropriate to merge its content to Australian Railway Historical Society#Serial publications. The notability of ARHS is not in question, so ''independent'' RSs are not required for inclusion there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)