Deletion of M. Alex O. Vasilescu

Comment: On the face of it this article would appear to pass both #C1 for highly cited publications https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=CVwySm8AAAAJ and  for heavy media coverage of that same research. And in fact I started to write a "keep" comment saying so, and pointing out that despite the badly written and promotional text of the article, AfD is not cleanup. But it does appear to be true that she is notable only for her student work (split into multiple publications, but all on the same general topic). Since completing her Ph.D. in 2009 she has done essentially nothing in the way of academic publishing https://dblp.org/pers/hd/v/Vasilescu:M=_Alex_O= and has dropped out of academia to become science officer at a startup, per her CV http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~maov/Vasilescu_CV.pdf. And much of the article appears to be copied and pasted from that cv. So there's a case to be made here for  and (because of the copyvio, not just the bad writing) . I'm holding off deciding for myself which way to go for now in the hope that more discussion here can clarify the case first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:TNT)

Comment: per Eppstein. GS h-index of 16 not enough to pass rof in this very highly cited field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: as as explained in my comment above. The main problem is lack of coverage. I would have been OK with an article (even without too much coverage), provided the publication of TensorFaces was widely notable. It seems to have been noticed, but I won't call it widely notable. I don't see a pass for #C1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The product (TensorFaces) may be notable, but does not imply notability of creator. Fails  and . I'm also very uncomfortable with the clear COI problems that are arising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)