Deletion of Tuhina Das

Comment: or '''Draftify''': A case of . While Beccaynr makes a good case that the subject ''could'' be notable in future, it does not meet the notability standards as of now. The non-trivial content provided by the above two articles is too less to keep under BASIC. May be draftified until there are significnt roles in multiple notable productions to meet NACTOR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Per Nom and Ab207. Although it may be  Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:toosoon)

Comment: below is an evaluation of the “sources”, provided above and the “piece” they optimized, all have been evaluated and still fall below the threshold of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Certainly looks like a keep to me, per . Looks like sustained ongoing coverage in both English and non-English sources. On the English side, while the ''Times of India'' isn't reliable for historical or political stuff, I think they're fine as far as tabloids go, and there's plenty of recent https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/news/tuhina-das-ghare-baire-aaj-has-been-a-turning-point-in-my-career/articleshow/83228617.cms coverage from them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)