Deletion of Ros Wilson

Comment: Certainly the technique is widely used in UK schools - to the extent that Education Authorities run courses on it e.g. http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/education/data/INSET/courses/LE/frmCourseDetails.asp?course=ENG152&suffix=b&year=2009/2010 but whether it's the technique that has a notability or the creator I'm not sure.  Certainly most of the hits I found go mention both.  On that basis I'm in favour of keeping it as meeting criteria #1 & #2 of .  I don't think  applies to this case as it's not involvement with scholarly research or higher education.  I do agree with MuffeldThud about tone and COI
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTH||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Non-notable per  and , highly promotional tone per  (rather better now following cleanup by WikiDan), clear onflict of interest by creator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:PROMO||WP:C)

Comment: Article seems to be primarily promotional. rof is not passed in any category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Largely pormotional.  His work might be notable but his biography does not apper to meet |notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)