Deletion of Zak Smith

Comment: unless this is another zak smith?), meets  (point no. 4), works in collections of Museum of Modern Art|MOMA - https://www.moma.org/artists/28814 here, Walker Art Center - https://walkerart.org/collections/artists/zak-smith here, and Saatchi Gallery - https://www.saatchigallery.com/artists/zak_smith.htm here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST)

Comment: Subject has published game materials, which meets or comes close to  #3. Those materials have won awards in the relevant genre. He's had art pieces in major museums and galleries per Coolabahapple's sources below. At least 'some' of Emperor's sources below are reliable. Overall, I think it meets notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: What is the opinion on the use of the Polygon article to establish notability? I'm discounting Bleedingcool and the Maxim article as not meeting  concerns
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: Non-notable since there is very little verifiable information on this page.  First two sections have no references at all.  Numerous anonymous edits to this page suggest self-promotion.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zak_Smith#Art Art section contains only one reference to support the three statements.  Irrelevant personal life statement describes two cities the subject lived in (again no reference).  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zak_Smith#See_also See also section appears irrelevant. Also: 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSINTHENEWS)

Comment: I've changed my !vote from delete to on the fence based on the new sources found by {{U|Masem}}. I still have concerns about  coverage here and how it connects to . Smith is an individual who seems to get a puff piece once every decade and a flurry of coverage when his bad behaviour catches up with him and I suspect that once the industry finishes saying that they'll no longer have anything to do with him, that'll be the last we hear of him. However my concern that Wikipedia ''cannot'' have a ''neutral'' article on Smith is ameliorated by the presence of the Polygon article, which is a reliable source commenting on the things that make him ''actually, currently notable''. As such I'm not wedded to deletion though I think the !votes for TNT may be leaning the right direction
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:BLP1E)