Deletion of European Jews for a Just Peace

Comment: Of the http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22European+Jews+for+a+Just+Peace%22 37 g-news hits, few, if any, are coverage of the organization. They therefore don't not meet the ''significant coverage'' requirement of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: The AfD is not concerned with the issues behind ''European Jews for a Just Peace'', and the issue is not the value that some WP users may see in that group. The issue is the article. The article does nothing to establish the notability of its subject. Nor is there anything that has entered in the discussion to show that a level of notability can be established to justify the WP article. The article clearly does not meet  standards outlined in its guidelines: ''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: per . There is '''very little evidence''' that this group is at all notable except. A few drive-by media references being passed off by other editors using adjectives (extensive??) that are at best misguided and at worst simply disingenuous - are you kidding me?  Wikipedia deserves a better standard than that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: The article only seems to reference the organisation's website. Could those asserting its notability please add some references to eliable sources, so we can see that it is notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)