Deletion of Gorilla Sandwich

Comment: There was only one disambiguation to be found pepper!? I fixed it via dablinks: http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py?page=Gorilla_Sandwich. Regarding  '''Keep''' I counted twenty-eight citations in the article that are nontrivial, secondary citations that are not original research. Each of them features the Gorilla Sandwich and supports notability. Sources with especially high editorial reliability and integrity that are included: The Palisade Post, The Huffingtonpost, Die Zeit (German Weekly Paper) and The Daily Titan. I counted another four citations that support the notability of the patent itself, which is inseparable from the Gorilla Sandwich as a whole that’s why I included it into this article instead of creating a new article for the “cucumber sandwich patent”. As it goes for advertising I counted three citations and one direct link that direct to the official page for Gorilla Sandwich. As those can be eliminated from the article I feel they are helpful to illustrate the product. One link refers to the history, the other verifies the ingredients on the label and the third its market place. All three are intended to be informative and not advertising for the product. The same counts for some of the evocative description of the Gorilla Sandwich in the article. I don’t see them as advertisement but as descriptive of the product. Please note that all them are cited and secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)