Deletion of Rieul (disambiguation)

Comment: per , per ClarityFiend. if neither is primary then that should be decided by a RM, but I too am unconvinced by that argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:TWODABS)

Comment: and copyedit - neither is a clear |primary topic: Google search results first page gives a mixture; page hits on our articles in December were 77 for the bishop and 55 for the Korean character (http://stats.grok.se/en/201512/Rieul, http://stats.grok.se/en/201512/Rieul%20%28hangul%29
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:PTOPIC)

Comment: per . Actually, it's the same spelling, but a hatnote in Rieul is just fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:TWODABS)

Comment: Rieul (disambiguation) → Rieul and Rieul → Rieul (bishop). I don't believe that there is a  for the term. In addition, the disambiguation should include a see also for Saint-Rieul, which would bring it up to three links
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC)