Deletion of Iván Enrique Rodríguez (2nd nomination)

Comment: The only question here is whether  is met when read alongside . As I see it, there is nothing in the article as it stands to demonstrate significant coverage in reliable sources. Most of those cited are neither "substantial" and few if any are independent or secondary sources. Unless some evidence to the contrary can be shown, there is really no dispute
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: He is good at what he does, but this article is clearly an attempted |resume, which he has either written himself or forwarded to a supporter for entry into Wikepdia, and for at least the third time. His achievements are within an esoteric community, hence the shortage of |significant and reliable media coverage and the article's dependence on |primary industry listings. The article also exaggerates his accomplishments, as the "Awards" are actually grants and contest entries. For example, the "ASCAP Leonard Bernstein Award" is a small scholarship that is given to multiple entrants every year. He deserves to be noticed by his professional peers, but qualifying for Wikipedia is a different process. It may happen in his future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTRESUME||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PRIMARY)