Deletion of Oil Industry Safety Directorate

Comment: as clearly notable.  See for example http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vcAZaEspPh4C&pg=PA131&dq=%22Oil+Industry+Safety+Directorate%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=unJaT4ucNITD8QPqsJiADw&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Oil%20Industry%20Safety%20Directorate%22&f=false, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pnI7-soFMcUC&pg=PA227&dq=%22Oil+Industry+Safety+Directorate%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=unJaT4ucNITD8QPqsJiADw&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=%22Oil%20Industry%20Safety%20Directorate%22&f=false, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2QdJlUGsyW0C&pg=PA266&dq=%22Oil+Industry+Safety+Directorate%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=unJaT4ucNITD8QPqsJiADw&ved=0CFwQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=%22Oil%20Industry%20Safety%20Directorate%22&f=false and some 900 other hits on Google Books.  |"AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: The sources provided by Cusop Dingle do signify notability, as the sections in the books are specifically about the OISD. I have |boldly removed the list of standards which did not add any encyclopedic value to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: per .  I amended the Prod because I thought it could be merged or improved to standard.  It's a government agency in one of the two largest nations on earth. I think, with the work done by User:Northamerica1000, that it's been rescued.  Good job
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)