Deletion of Darul Huda Islamic University (3rd nomination)

Comment: Meets  as there is significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: sufficient sources available to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: ndash;  is not a legitimate argument for deletion discussions. I have examined the available sources, and it does not seem that the criteria of  under ,  and  is met. Analysis: (i) the http://saudigazette.com.sa/article/175403 Saudi Gazette source is largely , as large chunks of the article include the author quoting or paraphrasing the interviewee, and in that it is at most a second-party source, and therefore cannot be used for the purpose of establishing notability; (ii) the https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/Recognition-for-Darul-Huda-university/article16244705.ece Hindu source reads like a press release/churnalism (see ), and it probably is one too; (iii) the https://web.archive.org/web/20160609220808/http://www.dhiu.in/the-vc/about-vc DHIU source is  as well as it is from the school's website; (iv) the https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/cherusseri-zainuddin-musliar-passes-away/article8255515.ece second article from Hindu is an obituary of an individual who served as the Pro-Chancellor of the institution, and does not give significant coverage to the institution; (v) the article in the http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/2015/jul/08/Students-Magazine-Thelitchamon-Transgender-Rights-Kicks-off-Debate-780691.html New Indian Express is about a student magazine that makes a transitory reference to the institution
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NSCHOOL||WP:NORG||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:PRIMARY||WP:PRIMARY)