Deletion of Hudson Greene

Comment: I know this is going against consensus, but I ended up here after deleting a block quote that had nothing to do with the buildings, and it led me to review all of the sources in the article. The first two sources are links to a building database. The next two are primary sources which link to the websites of each building. "Near-empty tower still holds hope" is about One Madison Park in New York and doesn't mention the complex at all. We then have three articles that are actually about the buildings, but aren't significant coverage. "High rise fire as at..." is four grafs long and doesn't talk about the buildings substantively. I cannot open the ABCLocal source. "Construction worker dies..." is also four-five grafs long and isn't about the building, but rather that someone died working there. "Skyline Wars..." mentions the buildings, along with a number of other buildings, over a couple grafs. I don't think it's significant coverage. A before search brings up mentions, but nothing in independent secondary coverage (such as there's a bitcoin machine in the building from a crypto blog.) If anyone finds any other independent secondary sources, please ping me, but this definitively fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly notable.  {{cite web |url=https://www.6sqft.com/skyline-wars-new-jerseys-waterfront-transforms-with-a-tall-tower-boom/ |title=Skyline Wars: New Jersey’s Waterfront Transforms With a Tall Tower Boom |date=May 3, 2016 |first1=Carter |last1=Horsley |accessdate=June 24, 2019}} No compliance (or cursory) compliance with efore. Article and sourcing is not now what it was when this nomination was proposed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: Not a single one of the above "Keep" votes have addressed the concerns I raised about . All significant reliable source coverage is related to the construction worker that died
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)