Deletion of Immigration Watch Canada

Comment: It's always a bad sign when the first two google hits are the organizations's own website, and our article.  The next hit is to the http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/news/immigration-watch-canada/ Huffington Post, Canada edition, which has three short articles on them.  All published within a seven month span in 2014.  Normally, I'd consider HuffPo a , but, 1) they only covered it in the Canada edition, 2) the articles are short, 3) they're really about specific events, i.e. the flyers, not the organization itself, and 4) they all are within a short time span..  So, I don't think this is enough to meet .  Also, HuffPo Canada is the only  I'm seeing.  Nobody else seems to be picking up on it.  Continuing to work down the first page of google hits, I see social media like twitter and facebook, and some political blogs.  Not the kind of coverage we're looking for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Sources from CBC, Toronto Star, Global News in the article, plus more available through https://www.google.ca/search?q=%22Immigration+Watch+Canada%22&oq=%22Immigration+Watch+Canada%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.295j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=%22Immigration+Watch+Canada%22&tbm=nws a Google News search would indicate that it passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)