Deletion of John Ruhlin

Comment: I have added multiple reputable sources to the page and significant content to show that Ruhlin is enough to meet . He has demonstrated significant contribution to strategies in business. With sources added it is enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: The Canton rep source is the best that exists for this subject and that is a fairly weak source anyway and alone isn't enough to pass .  While also factoring in that this is a BLP, the reasonable course of action is deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Ruhlin is a CEO and verified author. Content is neutral and sources are reliable.  yes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I like what Mr. Suntancity added.  Not much, but meet . Special:Contributions/82.117.88.217|82.117.88.217
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: does not meet  nor . Promo 'cruft. Being a {{tq|a CEO and verified author}} is an insufficient claim of significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Updated several links, appears to be recent news.   yes. Special:Contributions/82.117.94.96|82.117.94.96
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)