Deletion of 2080s

Comment: but remove any entries failing . Needing cleanup in no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Part of a bigger scheme. The predicted scientific events easily pass  - IE notable events that will happen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I could understand merging 2100s (decade)|2100s through 2190s into 22nd century, but the individual astronomical events here are clearly '''not''' , and are probably sufficient to warrant the existence of the page.  Also, part of a larger pattern.  If 2190s (the last decade with an article) were to be nominated for deletion, the "part of a pattern" argument would not be as signficiant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: there's |crystal ball gazing and then there's this. Obviously as we get closer, more and more things will be given 2080's deadlines. I wouldn't be excited about date-specific events in the 2080s being given stand-alone articles, but I think an article encompassing the entire decade-to-be is probably okay... for about the next 50 years or so. Even the year-specific fictional stuff is probably enough to justify an article as far as I'm concerned
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)