Deletion of Ishayas' Ascension

Comment: I'm finding this kind of tough to call, because there does appear to be a scholarly work that analyses the movement: it is discussed in Joshua Gunn's ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VpqKAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Ishayas+Ascension%22&dq=%22Ishayas+Ascension%22&hl=en&ei=OsX4TJSzJ5SahQev4sn6CA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&sqi=2&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAw Modern occult rhetoric: mass media and the drama of secrecy in the twentieth century'', published by Alabama University Press. There's also http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/health/Finding-a-way-to-inner.3003437.jp this article in a British local newspaper. Nothing else I've found could be said to constitute independent coverage. I am inclined to view this as coming up just short of |notability: we're looking at a couple of paragraphs in a book and one piece in a local paper, and if that's all the independent coverage that exists then the vast majority of the content in the article cannot ever be adequately cited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)