Deletion of Adam Andrzejewski

Comment: Doing a quick Google news search does seem to bring up a lot of significant third-party coverage of this person, especially with regards to his fund-raising ability. Seems to meet the third criteria mentioned in . The article could do with using these as references though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Don't see any in depth coverage above of this person. Blogs in the Chicago tribune on the unpronouncability of his name and others relating to his candidature aren't sufficient. Per  just being a candidate for office isn't enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Too soon, if at all.  Person with no political office and no evidence that he will make the primary.  Article is substantially like a campaign press release, complete with Wikipedia:Wikipuffery|wikipuffery like "entrepreneur", the implication that he could have retired at 37 without any financial records in evidence, claims of "national attention" from a magazine that itself is non-notable, crowing about "measurable accomplishments" because some county put its check register online, etc.  Even if subject were notable by now, this article would need to be reduced to  or totally rewritten to meet  and .  And it seems reasonable to conclude that "significant coverage" in criteria means sources from which coverage is a sign of notability.  Merely being able to fill space is a different story: making one's own media availability a full-time job is not notable (unless one leaks a sex tape and gets a TV show, but that has only worked for females so far).  And Wikipedia is for people who ''are'' already notable (see specifically ), not those who someone thinks |ought to be or |are destined to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NPOV||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: more or less per Panyd above. Here's the Google News results for 'Adam Andrzejewski': http://news.google.co.uk/news?q=Adam%20Andrzejewski&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn. Many of those are trivial references, but there's several that seem acceptable sources, such as http://www.cdobs.com/archive/syndicated/andrzejewski-puts-tax-records-online,36352, http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2009/07/andrzejewski-makes-blagojevich-look-like-cat.html and http://www.wgil.com/localnews.php?xnewsaction=fullnews&newsarch=072009&newsid=258. It looks to me like there are enough references to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)