Deletion of Los Santos, San Andreas (2nd nomination)

Comment: to GTA V. '''Delete''' with the same rationale as Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vice_City - the actual reliable sources that describe these game worlds can all fit in the respective parent articles, so a  isn't warranted; at best merge the few reliable sources into the parent articles. This is gamecruft that parent article don't want and proper |writing about fiction wouldn't need a whole article for each zone split from the game. News hype of screenshots is not in-depth reception required for independently notable articles. I would support a list of GTA places ''if'' it is sourced and written from real-world encyclopedic perspective. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT||WP:WAF)

Comment: The claim that we should delete this simply because it's related to a computer game is absurd.  GTA5 had a budget of $265M — which is more than most major movies — and so clearly a lot of artistic work went into it.  It has been receiving massive coverage in mainstream media such as the article I was reading, just this morning, about photography within this virtual city — ''http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/26/gamers-group-together-to-take-stunning-images-in-grand-theft-auto-v-4118842/ Gamers group together to take stunning images in Grand Theft Auto V''.  The nomination seems to be a case of  contrary to  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:CENSOR||WP:NPOV)