Deletion of Inland Southern California

Comment: A news search brings 74K hits, however all of them are of articles in the newspaper listed above, however the term itself brings several other hits of usage of the term to describe the region in the article in question. Yet, I am unsure if those usages constitute the subject of the article, the region in question, is |nortable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: I'm confused what is being argued- that there are no sources to be found? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22inland%20southern%20california%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp Here are a batch of books, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22inland%20southern%20california%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1,nws:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=pn a few news sources, and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22inland%20southern%20california%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ns it's being used as a common term, though perhaps not by discussing it in much depth. If the issue is that it simply echoes two other articles, it appears to do so in |proper summary style
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)