Deletion of ‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens

Comment: The WaPo, NYT etc. articles are clearly  for the topic of this article since they address it directly and in detail. The topic is notable as a cultural phenomenon. The title is clearly the  for this series of articles since it is the way that reliable sources refer to it. Allegations of it being too long don't seem well founded, whilst  is not a great argument, it is still instructive to compare and contrast with Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:COMMONNAME||WP:WAX)

Comment: WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC is one of the rguments to avoid in deletion discussions, and I don't see how this falls under . The sources already in the article show that it meets , and more could be added
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:NOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: The nominator has essentially not advanced any meaningful argument ''for'' deletion, and numerous arguments against deletion have been given above. The title being so long that no one would type it in the search box is possibly the weakest argument for a redirect I've head in a while. The subject has received substantial independent coverage sufficient to meet , and that's good enough for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as the page's creator. Article satisifies . Multiple reliable sources, including the New York Times and the Washington Post, have written specifically about the "No Way To Prevent This" posts and the impact those specific posts (not just The Onion generally) have had. These sources have already been cited in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)