Deletion of Outline of Louisiana history

Comment: per . This amateurish, childish, utopian and pointless group of forks (together with the whole "outline" series) is about what one set of Wikipedia users find ''really'' important about a topic; I trust our readers will be able to discern that from actual articles, not distillations thereof
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom and don't upmerge to "Outline of State" since |I hate the whole premise of these outline "articles" per "That's not how we do things around here". Our category system is perfectly |useful. If moved to project space, please please please get the related state WikiProjects on board for clean up and expansion, they will know much better what should go in each outline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: as blantant s
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: or possible merge. I see 2 arguments for deletion. 1) They are not perfect. So edit them! 2) They break policy, e.g. , , , . I know about  but will bring it up anyway, if you are offended by that just stop reading. There are a number of policis that can be used against outlines today, but there are also a number of accepted pages that break these same polices, with our without policies that allows those exception. See e.g.  for notability. As many above have stated any navigational system should be encouraged, I agree to that and therefore to keep these outlines, and maybe some policies has to be adjusted, then lets discuss that and adjust them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:FORK||WP:OR||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:DPAGES)