Deletion of Laura McCullough

Comment: The works by the author, biographies of the author, etc., are not useful in asserting notability; what is ultimately required for inclusion is third-party coverage. All I see from the links provided by the subject of the article at the talk page are, at best, a handful of book reviews from sources that are questionable as |reliable sources of secondary information. I do not believe that sufficient evidence of meeting  has been presented or is available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_McCullough&diff=620247092&oldid=620136193 Excellent work by {{u|Carrite}}, new version passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: My train got delayed so apologies for arriving very late here. Looking at the present version of the articlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_McCullough&oldid=620435086 (and nothing in the history), the article is quite fine, it meets our  policy and notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: for those who are new to Wikipedia, the guideline we follow for poets & their notability is to be found at . I recommend that they check the link and consider before posting here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Canvassing on the persons Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/laura.mccullough.566. If someone can advise them about our rules on , that would be appreciated. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: as not meeting |notability per nominator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)