Deletion of Laurel Schwulst

Comment: It appears to me that she meets . Besides being frequently mentioned, she is often interviewed in the context of web design, and is sometimes mentioned for her work or how she became a web designer. There seems to be content mentioning her in other languages https://www.onassis.org/el/enter/sunshine-piece-laurel-schwulst, so  cannot be neglected either. On top of , or probably as a consequence of it, overall it seems that she is ''"significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"'' per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:NEXIST||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BIO)

Comment: A citation is a mention in a published academic work.  A syllabus certainly does not qualify, and I'm not seeing evidence of citations otherwise.  So I'm not seeing .   looks more plausible, but I'm not seeing good evidence of any of the criteria: C1 is similar to GNG, I see no assertion of C2, I'm not seeing reviews of work for C3, and I'm not seeing significant and/or notable exhibitions for C4.  I'm watching the discussion, and will change my !vote if better evidence of notability is uncovered
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NCREATIVE)

Comment: per above as she meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)