Deletion of UK Amateur Storm Forecasts

Comment: does not meet the requirements for |notability, nor any possibility of obtaining reliable third party sources to meet this requirement for inclusion. This is aside from the obvious |conflict of interest concerns as well as the |consequences of ignoring that guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COI||WP:LUC)

Comment: Yes, '''"If an article currently does not cite reliable secondary sources, that does not necessarily mean that its topic is not notable."'''  That is talking about articles that reliable 3rd party sources are available just not provided in the article currently.  From the policy on |verifiability: "'''If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.'''"  There are no 3rd party reliable sources available to add to this article, so Wikipedia should not have an article on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)