Deletion of Unit test framework

Comment: The nominator's problems with the current text seem spot-on.  We do not need articles with elaborate quotations in source code.Moreover, I would question whether we need quite so much granularity about the minutiae of software development or the problems of supervising software developers.  That sort of thing seems to attract spam; be poorly written; full of vaguely abstract talk of "processes" and "systems".  My general impression is that it constitutes a sort of |tech-management-cruft.  |Notability is usually not an issue, since there probably is an extensive literature for any such subject you might name; readability, general interest, and sorting out legitimate topics from stealth spam are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:N)