Deletion of Corporate Insight

Comment: per nomination.  The article seems to be another of those articles inserted by a publicist.  It begins, not by describing the business except in the most general terms, but with what's essentially argument that the business is notable. The coverage turns out to be a peck of offhand mentions in publications that |aren't about this business and do not speak of it in any detail.  The business itself is another |consulting firm apparently promoting mobile phone technology to banks and other financial firms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:B2B)

Comment: This company fails the |general notability guideline which requires significant coverage (addressing the subject directly in detail) in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject.  I have reached out and welcomed Marino9813 on the new editor's talk page in an attempt to obtain such sources.  The article now has 24 sources, and I've now read every one.  Most of them are passing mentions of the general form, "John Smith of Corporate Insight said that a report they've published concluded etc. etc. etc." Sources 6, 15, 16, 17 and 18 are press releases, and are therefore not independent.  Sources 15 and 19 are from the company's own website and are therefore not independent.  I will be happy to change my recommendation if at least two independent, reliable  sources addressing the company in detail are provided that show that this company meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)