Deletion of Trevor Doerksen

Comment: Being a founder of a company is not in and of itself an automatic notability freebie, per  — it can get a person into Wikipedia ''if'' the article can be sourced well enough to pass , but none of the sourcing here does that. It's almost all |primary sources, like his own company's press releases about itself and a chapter he ''wrote'' in a book metasourcing ''itself'', and the only one that qualifies as a |reliable source at all is just a glancing namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite rather than an article that's substantively ''about'' him. That's not the kind of sourcing it takes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: no evidence of passing notability guidelines; GNG claims to fame are for non-notable things. Basic  turns up nothing actually about the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)