Deletion of Rod of Seven Parts (2nd nomination)

Comment: I've played the game for years and still it's only otable for D&D players and fans a small subset of the general public.  Wikipedia is not a guide and this can be found in the Dungeon Master's Guide or at an external Wiki like http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page D&D Wiki.  Refer to the deletion discussions surrounding the Star Wars individual items and Wookiepedia. Star Wars individual items and minor characters has much greater and wider general appeal and did not survive much of those AfD arguments so why should this badly written stub about a D&D specific magic item survive? This item fails the  and at best could be included in a D&D Magic Items page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PTEST)

Comment: unless someone can show how this article will have real world context and not fail lot.  (unsigned comment by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: although there is ample coverage, none of it is independent of TSR/WotC.  Hence, the topic fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: On the previous AfD I took a "weak delete" line, but this renomination reeks of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: and nominator should be warned of  violation. Added afterward: The closing admin. will probably note that several of the "Keep" !votes, including my own, primarily mention the potential  violation as a justification for speedily closing this discussion.  There are, however, enough ignoring the obvious bad form and commenting on the article itself, which is a good thing, and there are still significant keep-favoring editors either way.  I also want to add "per my arguments in the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rod_of_Seven_Parts|last AfD" for the record
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:POINT)

Comment: as this fictional artifact fails . What this article does not provide is any context; if it did, it would be clearly stated that it is  one of dozens of http://www.greyhawkonline.com/grodog/gh_artifacts.html minor artifacts used to support a role-playing game by the same name, outside of which it has no significance. There are or never will be any |reliable secondary sources, as this artifact has the equivalent notability of a foot stool in a furniture catalogue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:RS)

Comment: WP:BP|Disruptive repetition per |Renominations.  Nominator may also be #Gaming the system|gaming the system by nominating on Christmas Eve.  Perhaps nominator's account should be blocked during the Christmas period?  As for the article in question, it has good notability and sources.  The deletion proposal is really just |''Bah, humbug
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:POINT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)