Deletion of NASHI

Comment: Since when was a church newsletter sufficient to pass , as per the previous keep? The keep vote before points out that the sources cited don't even support each other. All of these references are hyperlocal, and that the author felt they needed to include a couple of sentences about a "45-minute event" they ran years ago strongly points to failing our notability criteria rather dismally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources linked above, in the article, and the following links look to satisfy : paywalled "Human Trafficking and Media Myths: Federal Funding, Communication Strategies, and Canadian Anti-Trafficking Programs" in Canadian Journal of Communication 39(3), http://www.pressreader.com/canada/leader-post/20151107/282544427184945/TextView Leader-Post, http://www.archdiocese.ca/rescs/com/191.2008.Winter.pdf Archdiocese of Canada newsletter... &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)