Deletion of Jaina Solo (2nd nomination)

Comment: as this article has no real-world content, fails  and contains no real-world evidence of |notability. There are no |sources to verify its content, which must be classed as |original research. There is no consensus to keep this article, which fails all of Wikipedia guidelines, policies which express standards that have community wide consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:FICT||WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: fails to assert any notability through |reliable |verifiable sources independent of the subject material. She's certainly been present in quite a few novels, and I'll defer if critical reception is shown, but as it stands, the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: and redirect to Solo_family for lack of |reliable sources -- 50% of the article's sources I just deleted as a citation to an unreliable, fan-generated encyclopedia. Something so notable, especially after what was supposed to be a kick-in-the-pants-AfD several months ago, should have more substantiation (and, ideally, out-of-universe substance) behind it. Perhaps these random offspring articles are best conglomerated into the family blurbs. The latter right now aren't that much better, but perhaps the minuscule data on this characters individually can come together to sustain an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: due to a lack of independent, |reliable sources about the topic.  The phrase “Jaina Solo” gets a lot of Google hits, but mostly to fan sites.  The published works appear to be official guides that do not provide the information needed for this article to pass .  I do not object to a redirect to Solo family, but that page is not any better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PLOT)