Deletion of London Buses route 53

Comment: to the list. Wikipedia is not the sum of ''all'' human knowledge. There are many areas for which reliable sources could be found which are not considered worth including. Primary schools for instance have to be of outstanding interest to get an article. Shopping malls have to be of substantial size to be covered, likewise companies. The policies  and  have a bearing on this. Most of these articles have been created by bus fans with little or no encyclopedic content. They are often sourced to news stories about incidents that just happened to be on a route rather than about the actual route. Notability is not inherited from such things. We do not need an article on every ordinary route. Neither do arguments about Wikipedia being a gazeteer have much bearing on this. Gazetteers tend to cover the generalities of travel in an area rather than reproducing detailed directory information which is subject to frequent change
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: There appears to have been some |canvassing by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: for now, or consider '''Redirect''' to List of bus routes in London. While a majority of London bus articles aren't notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia - route 53 is one of the more prominent ones. There isn't a great deal of secondary sources in this article, as it stands currently, but this can be easily improved with historical publications to satisfy the  standard
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Bus routes are significant geographic features of a city. They are usually fairly permanent (i.e., they may change every few years, but not every month, so it's possible to keep up with the changes. Some people hee seem to think we  have a rule than WP is Not a Gazetteer--no, in fact we have a very fundament al policy in ive pillars that WP ''' "combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers. "''', Bus routes are mainly discussed in local papers when significant changes are proposed-- and to the extent we admit them as reliable sources for notability, it should possible to find sourcing.   The question has nothing to do with the GNG--for the aspect of WP that resembles a traditional encyclopedia  , the GNG is usually relevant; for the parts that resemble an almanac or Gazetteer, it is not, because such publication are comprehensive, not selective, and cover every event or featureof theype, not selecting, as encyclopedias do, on the basis of significance or notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F)

Comment: This article passes  since it has received significant coverage over many different type of sources that do include . The threshold of notability has been breached
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)