Deletion of Pro-pedophile activism

Comment: Notable topic, even if people |don't like it. AfD is not a proper methodology for improving an article; the proper methodology is ''improving'' it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Perhaps overly detailed, somewhat in need of fixing, and definitely in need of careful watching -- but none of those come close to reasons for deletion in the face of the actual referenced notability and impact of the subject.  ain't for clean-up, and certainly not as a tool in someone's personal crusade
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: Extremely in-depth, well-sourced article about an inherently notable movement.  Any argument for deletion is bound, in the end, to come down to .  Understandable, but that isn't a good reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)