Deletion of Judith Newman

Comment: I absolutely hate the way this article came to be. With a passion. That being said, based off what I've seen in the article over the past few hours, I can't really deny that the references provided meet . Unfortunately, "scumbag practices" is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While it may not be the most popular argument going to be cited, "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity..."  The notability and other policies are not meant to be wielded as a weapon on subjective notability or someone's non-interest as a test. We got 24 citations and several multiple non-trivial independent sources that specifically deal with the subject and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3640239/Is-this-the-angriest-woman-in-the-media.html this Telegraph article alone should conifer and confirm notability. This meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)