Deletion of Adolf Hitler Uunona

Comment: this is a textbook . This politician does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NPOL)

Comment: As per , Hitler has sufficient reliable 3rd party sources to justify the existance of the article. While it may be a stub now, there is more to come no doubt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think the problem with this one is that his notability rests not on the office he holds or his political career, but entirely the coverage he has gathered because of his name. The level of coverage of him is very large, but will it be a short lasting news event, or will it continue? At the moment I do not think there is a clear and obvious answer to this question, which makes it very difficult to judge if he will meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: I fully understand the  argument, but frankly I don't believe it is adhered to thoroughly. I mean, why the heck do we have articles about Abdul Khaliq (cricketer), Abdul Laheji, Abdul Majeed (Kalat cricketer), Abdul Majeed (cricketer, born 1993) https://wp1.openzim.org/#/project/Cricket/articles?quality=Stub-Class&importance=Low-Class and so forth, who have literally '''''not even once''''' been notable? I agree Hitler hasn't done much (yet), but the media coverage was truly global and he was noted not ''just'' for the name, but also for winning the election. And for those claiming that local politicians are not notable, I would point to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Local_politicians Category:Local politicians and ask why that exists? There quite a few people in there who are notable for nothing else besides winning an election and serving for a while (which Hitler here has done as well). I'm not saying the arguments for deletion are invalid, but I'm questioning whether they really are applicable here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: the subject fails  and .  It's a very obvious 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per "The C of E" passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The position seems to be as Dunarc states, and I am certainly not convinced that there is likely to be  coverage. This seems more like a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:FART)