Deletion of Strong gravitational constant (2nd nomination)

Comment: User:seshavatharam.uvs is presumably UVS Seshavatharam, someone who is doing research in this field, and whose paper is cited in the article. Like Sfisenko above, they were presumably |canvassed by Fedosin by email. Everyone is welcome to fairly consider seshavatharam.uvs's opinion, but we should be aware of this context
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment:  and  are not by themselves grounds for deletion. / can of course support a recommendation for deletion if the whole article is solely OR, and it is clearly not possible to solve the issues by the normal Wikipedia process. Is the claim that this is the case here? Based on the Google scholar hits, the topic appears to be notable enough. &nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: WP:NOTE|Non-notable |fringe physics, presented as uncontroversial truth by someone with the worst conflict of interest. This is a clear-cut case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)