Deletion of Upfiring

Comment: Passes  relative for the subject's industry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: fails , there seem to be a load of these at AFC as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPRODUCT)

Comment: Just of the 300+ cryptocoin articles that have gone before and been deleted, and the reason NCORP came about. Fails , ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: This is one of the most popular Ethereum-based DApps, and would be considered notable especially relative to the cryptocurrency space. This passes , saying a cryptocurrency should only be covered on Wikipedia if it gets mainstream media coverage (typically reserved only for the top 10 cryptocurrencies or so) and that all crypto-focused sites are irrelevant is not appropriate. We should be focused on adding information about cryptocurrencies to Wikipedia, not removing it. Special:Contributions/2601:88:280:2C45:8196:B21F:BF25:B957|2601:88:280:2C45:8196:B21F:BF25:B957
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)