Deletion of Checkmarx

Comment: under criterion #A7|A7 for an article about a company that has no assertion of notability. Also the  issues just shoot up like rockets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Problems with promotional language can be solved by editing, so that doesn't require deletion. The problem is the lack of coverage for this company in |reliable sources. There appears to be a small amount of coverage (e.g., http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-164901181.html this), but not enough to demonstrate notability. If the company is successful it may become notable in the future, but I don't think it is there today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I'm not quite sure I see a speedy deletion candidate here, but it doesn't appear to pass  at any rate.  Not to mention  problems, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:COI)