Deletion of Willow Creek Pass (Montana)

Comment: Major geographical features such as this are inherently notable. The sources verify the pass (contrary to users claims above, it easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Sure it's an Essay, not a guideline, but  can't be completely ignored.  It's the consensus of many. many AFD's and carries weight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: No sources, no claims of notability. So it FAILS  and  (a guideline and a policy, both of which carry far more weight than a editors personal opinion and a essay). Also, this article has been a 1 sentence stub since it's creation in November 2006, so its had more than enough time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Fails . That the place exists is not in doubt, but the article does not assert or prove notability. Wikipedia:Places of local interest is a readable essay, Wikipedia:Not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook is official policy. Both say the same thing - a place, regardless of whether it's a mountain pass, a stream, a tower, a cinema, etc, needs to be notable for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: while it exists, I don't see why this mountain pass is notable, fails , and sourcing is a concern, as the current sources show that the mountain pass exists, but no other info likely can be found about it. For the  commenters, |consensus can change
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CCC)