Deletion of Oscar (cat)

Comment: the cute kitty. One could make a passing mention in Canine cancer detection as a related/similar case, but no need to have an article about it. #NEWS and all that. Maybe put it up on Wikinews. Maybe. And sorry, Quidam, AfD's are decided on consensus, not sleeping habits of felines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: And keep that cat away from me. The  argument is rather undermined by the fact that the ''New England Journal of Medicine'' isn't a newspaper. Ergo, it more than meets our notability criteria. Having said that, as I watched this story on BBC News last night I was rather annoyed to hear it get credited as some kind of precognitive feline grim reaper, when the interviewee at the care home explicitly said it was just responding to human cues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Newsworthy is not noteworthy.   could be considered to apply as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This is recentism.  is an excellent shortcut to know. I should have mentioned that in the murder victim afds yesterday
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Well sources article, based on an essay in a most prestigious sceintific journal. It's sad to see how the argument of "ecentism|recentism" yet again is used by people who are short of arguents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)