Deletion of Master Hilarion

Comment: I'm not a follower of this religion and have not edited these articles prior to this AfD.  I must voice my concern that a group of articles about a significant minority religion were nominated for deletion following derogatory comments on the ringe theories/Noticeboard in a report titled ''"ringe theories/Noticeboard#Walled gardens of woo|Walled gardens of woo"''. What is ''"woo"'' intended to convey?  It reads like an insult to the believers in this religion, and to the editors who worked on the articles.  An insult appears the text of this nomination also: The listed pages represent "Masters of Wisdom" according to Theosophy. In the nomination, they are described as ''"a... thing ..."''    What does that mean?  How would people respond if a Catholic Saint or Archangel were referred to as ''"a... thing ..."'' ?   Insulting characterizations of minority religious beliefs and the work of well-intentioned editors do not belong in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F||WP:F)

Comment: A |neutral point of view encyclopedia is founded on |verifiability. Of course Wikipedia should have an appropriate depth and breath of coverage of the history, beliefs, and personalities of the theosophist movement, but having perused the articles, it appears that every one of them rests on overtly theosophist books for effectively all of the content. This is not a healthy state of affairs and seems to be an argument in favour of ruthless merging and/or redirecting. Could any of these articles be rewritten to use independent, non-theosophist sources for at least the key points
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V)

Comment: Does notability automatically transfer from a religion to its pantheon?  Is that consistent with the "significant coverage" standard of ? (Also, ''Christianity and Theosophy Harmonized'' does not appear to be an independent source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: or merge - the sited references only mention the subject twice. Subject does not meet  or  guidelines. The article is only 3 sentences on the subject. There should be a page that lists all the deities with a brief description
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)