Deletion of Murder of Reuven Shmerling

Comment: it is one murder of an individual and has no significance beyond family and local community, fails . It may have been picked up in some US news outlets, but that is not a sole reason for declaring the event notable by Wikipedia standards, fails . This is mostly a regional occurrence. It is no longer being picked up in the news cycle, and new information coverage seems to have stopped about 20 days ago, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: and obviously so. There were 302 murders in Detroit in 2016. 762 in Chicago. Each of those are about as notable as this, meaning that while they may be tragic events they are not, as individual events, topics suitable for an encyclopedia. And  is still, last I checked, Wikipedia policy.  is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: That it has been been declared an act of terrorism pushes this event beyond a  murder. It has also been the subject of worldwide coverage. It at least meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG)

Comment: This can hardly be considered routine when both Shin Bet and the Israeli Ministry are treating the victim as a terror victim.https://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-man-murdered-in-arab-city-recognized-as-terror-victim/http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Police-Shin-Bet-investigating-Shmerling-murder-as-possible-terrorist-attack-506964 It's not a purely regional story, but one that was syndicated by the AP. https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/israel-arrests-2-palestinians-after-israeli-man-found-dead/ The claim that there is no continuing coverage is also erroneous, as although coverage has naturally slowed because of the gag, there is still continuing coverage (e.g. https://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-man-murdered-in-arab-city-recognized-as-terror-victim/ a October 15 Times of Israel piece about the victim being declared a terror victim by the Defence Ministry and Israeli president visiting the victim's family and http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/236822 a October 17 Arutz Sheva piece about a delegation of Arab politicans visiting the family and talking about the impact on the community). This is sufficient to meet  and , and given the pronouncements by the Israeli government, will only be solidified by the trial, regardless of how that goes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: per . Disparage article creator for rushing to start an article, and Nom for rushing to delete without running a proper  when even a brief, good faith search would have shown that investigators are calling this terrorism, and that coverage is not ROUTINE  (Nom has a track record of making y nominations of terrorist incidents for deletion.)   However, article exists and, as Icewhiz states, we diverse, reliable, non local, non-routine sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:BEFORE||WP:POINT)

Comment: it per  which says if subject is discussed by the reliable sources and discussed in detail without any need to write per  then the subject is notable. But here he is part of an event then we should have an article on the event instead. Article is written from encyclopedic point-of-view so  doesn't apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: No encyclopedic value whatsoever. ''If'' this murder turns out to be something more than a routine crime, and ''if'' the killing has repercussions, it ''may'' be appropriate to have an article about it. Until then, put away your |crystal balls, because you don't know whether this story will have "legs", and we don't keep trivial articles on the small possibility that a news story might develop into something more. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:crystal ball)

Comment: per . There is coverage. It actually has been confirmed as terror - https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5028756,00.html Reuven Shmerling recognized as victim of terrorism, YNET, 15 October 2017 - not that this is relevant for  /  - what matters is coverage. At this point it would be crystal balling to assess the future persistent (or lack thereof) of coverage. In terms of coverage level - '''national level coverage''' is AOK for NCRIME. Notability is assessed per coverage - and in this case - 15 days of coverage - during which coverage is sufficient for those 15 days
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:GNG||WP:NCRIME)

Comment: Per  which says "Routine kinds of news events (including '''most crimes''', accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are '''usually not notable''' unless something further gives them additional enduring significance. Absolutely nothing to demonstrate this murder was of exceptional notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: not a mass casualty incident & no apparent encyclopedic relevance. A routine news story at this point, and I'm not convinced by the suggestions that  is applicable here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)