Deletion of James R. Crisfield

Comment: I'm reluctant to invoke  for an extended event, but it seems unlikely that this person will ever be ''known,'' or of ''note'' in the sense that we invoke notability -- that is to say, enough people care about his life to get nontrivial coverage in secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The article has now been ed with the use of the adjective "notable" and a lengthy chart of the editor's picking and choosing from primary sources and then |synthesizing it with third-party sources that don't mention Crisfield. Still doesn't establish notability for the ''person'', as opposed to a subsection of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals article discussing memos by Crisfield and others
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFF||WP:SYN)

Comment: No sources of biographic data on this individual are used in the article, nor was I able to find any.   applies, the potential merge target is Combatant Status Review Tribunal, the information in this article would not enhance that article, so merging should not occur and deletion should occur
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Doesn't meet wp:bio notability standards. The only "poking of the creator" that should be going is to tell him to quit creating articles that clearly do not meet  in order to |further his cause of making Wikipedia everything Guantanamo Bay. With respect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COATRACK)