Deletion of Brogrammer

Comment: or secondly '''Merge''' (per Borock and others)''':''' In my personal opinion I think this term is more worthy of Urban Dictionary than an Encyclopedia. That aside, "Brogrammer" is a combination of "bro" and "programmer", the first of the two being slang itself. Now the sources used for the article use the word in quotes or describe it in some other fashion as not to confuse it with a proper word and to identify it as slang. I question it's notability in the sense that the term may not be widely used or continue to be relevant at all in the future, sort of along the lines of . http://gizmodo.com/5910824/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-brogrammer There's No Such Thing as a Brogrammer I tend to agree with this source which is actually used in the article. One of the other sources is sort of a mock up encyclopedia from a computer magazine. The rest seem to be sources about sexism within jobs in computer related industries. These sources use the term in quotes as slang, and there are no mainstream media sources or any source using it as a standalone term without explanation. So while this term may be warrant a mention in a feminism article about sexism or perhaps a short description in computer related article, I do not think it's valid enough to require it's own article. At the very least this article title should be followed with "(slang)" such as Cornhole (slang) and Redskin (slang) have
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: or merge it somewhere. Either way, |Wikipedia is not a dictionary and looks like the term is used in relation to another situation. |The word is not the subject, it's just related to the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC||WP:WORDISSUBJECT)

Comment: Poor neologism. The first paragraph is a single example of its usage by a single company at a single university's career fair.  The second paragraph is not about the 'term'. It's about the computer science industry.  Violates Wikipedia is not a dictionary ().  {{reply to|Tomwsulcer}} the article in The Atlantic only mentions 'brogrammer' in the title and the final paragraph.  The article is about the industry, not the term. All of the sources are.  So it's also a . I would support merging it to the women in computing or sexism in tech articles (someone may also want to propose merging those two also if it hasn't already been done), but can we please change the heading name to something more encyclopedic than 'Brogrammer Culture'.  That heading name needs serious work... &#8213;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: or '''Merge''' per nom. Wikipedia is not the Urban Dictionary. This is a neologism—something explicitly mentioned as a reason for deletion at -REASON, unless there are RSs. Yes, this "word" has been seen in general media, but those are not RS's for neologisms; we need dictionary entries for that. I agree that some of this could be merged to Women in computing or Sexism in the technology industry, and a redirect left from here to there. btw, refs 5, 6, 7, and 8 do not mention this term (but those refs would make complete sense in the Women in computing or Sexism in the technology industry articles, if they're not already there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)