Deletion of John Bessler

Comment: No standalone notability, would fail , no particularly large coverage on Google. One of his books is fairly popular according to WorldCat but that's about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The issue of the book being notable while the author |is not is a common one - my !vote is based solely on the notability of the latter. If anything this AFD makes a case for  '''moving''' the article to the book's title instead
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Colapeninsula's links are sufficient evidence of passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Meets  criterion 4.  &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per  and . I don't see  applying here as he is a professor by occupation, and just happened to write a book or two
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:AUTHOR)