Deletion of Omise (Company) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not a single source meets the criteria for establishing notability which are detailed in . Despite the "Keep" !votes above, the criteria is not "considerable amount of coverage" or "strong reliable sources". They must also be "independent" as per . Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Per nom. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: With respect, it is a common mistake to say that articles such as the ones you mention meet the criteria for establishing notability. They don't.  explains in great detail what is required in terms of independence and states ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: The most in-depth appear with Thai Rath and The Nation (Thailand), these are strong reliable sources. I think together these constitute enough coverage to satisfy the . Don't  with your personal feeling
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKE)