Deletion of Misuse of antisemitic accusations

Comment: An appropriate topic could be something like "contemporary debates about antisemitism," although that in itself should probably start as part of a larger article.  As framed here it's a , by limiting its scope so narrowly to one controversial claim
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: I'm sure most  violations could be made into something resembling an article, but that doesn't make them encyclopedic. This is an synthetized essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: This is a fucking joke. It's basically a personal essay and the most obvious example of ,  and  I've seen on Wikipedia. There's barely anything here but a list of people who have been accused of antisemitism, who, presumably in the article creator's infallible opinion, didn't deserve it. There are absolutely no objective criteria determining which cases are considered a "misuse", and even if there were the whole exercise would still be clear-cut original research and synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:POVFORK)