Deletion of Maurice D. Jester

Comment: I believe there ''should'' be notability here - "on the cover of ''Life''" is a very high bar that most don't clear - but most of the references that exist in the article are |internal USCG publications. I assume there was an actual article in ''Life'' on him? Or at least a blurb? That would help
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: The boat naming and LIFE cover feature are "''significant award or honor''"s and so pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: As {{u|Geo Swan}} said, there are plenty of books that discuss Jester. Examples: https://books.google.com/books?id=XeoLAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj848L9i7PuAhX2EVkFHfKDCXY4ChDoATACegQIARAC 1, https://books.google.com/books?id=-_BNt02kWdIC&pg=PA193&dq=%22Maurice+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi03oCNjLPuAhUZGVkFHQluCNEQ6AEwAnoECAQQAg#v=onepage&q=Jester&f=false 2, https://books.google.com/books?id=e5UpAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjTz_DQi7PuAhUnGVkFHT2hDIkQ6AEwBXoECAcQAg 3, https://books.google.com/books?id=CoQTGO9X_8UC&q=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjTz_DQi7PuAhUnGVkFHT2hDIkQ6AEwBHoECAAQAg 4, https://books.google.com/books?id=r-oaAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjTz_DQi7PuAhUnGVkFHT2hDIkQ6AEwBnoECAgQAg 5, https://books.google.com/books?id=5o7vAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjTz_DQi7PuAhUnGVkFHT2hDIkQ6AEwB3oECAkQAg 6, https://books.google.com/books?id=LvVmAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+D.+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjTz_DQi7PuAhUnGVkFHT2hDIkQ6AEwCXoECAUQAg 7, https://books.google.com/books?id=r9xXAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Maurice+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi03oCNjLPuAhUZGVkFHQluCNEQ6AEwBXoECAkQAg 8, https://books.google.com/books?id=JTt5AAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maurice+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi03oCNjLPuAhUZGVkFHQluCNEQ6AEwBnoECAcQAg 9, https://books.google.com/books?id=V-GfAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maurice+Jester%22&dq=%22Maurice+Jester%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi03oCNjLPuAhUZGVkFHQluCNEQ6AEwCHoECAUQAg 10. These were easy to find, and {{u|Mztourist}} should have done so before nominating this article for deltion: rticles for deletion#Before nominating: checks and alternatives|the policy requires one to "search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability", and instructs that "the minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search". And this is the "''mimimum'' search expected"; expanding the parameters ever so slightly to include newspapers.com results in scores more easy-to-find sources. Examples: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68343062 1; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342296 2; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342601 3; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68343213 4; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68343128 5; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342096 6; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342435 7; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342652 8; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342527 9; https://www.newspapers.com/clip/68342783 10. Although Mztourist claims that "If you believe that there is SIGCOV in multiple RS then add it in", this is a significant misstatement of policy. After all, the policy states that "If you find that adequate sources ''do appear to |exist'', the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources". So really, if anyone should have found and added these sources, it should have been Mztourist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Not only is his achievement remarkable., it also easily surpasses .  Since there are already lots of  that show ignificant coverage, one can only conclude that efore was 'more honored in the breach than the observance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:S||WP:B)