Deletion of The Seven Worlds (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:V|Unverifiable |original research. May even be a hoax
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per . A source request was issued months ago, no sources have been provided. Most of us editors don't know enough about the field to tell if this is reliable material or total hooh-hah. That's why the|sourcing policy is there. If no sources are provided in reasonable time, the article should be deleted, and that should be that. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: As unverifiable.   and  requires those who wish to keep an assertion to produce verification when challenged.  The Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seven Worlds | prior AFD should have been viewed as such a challenge.  Four month later, with no sources, we should view the article as unverifiable.  Merge is only appropriate for sourced material, so no merge is right to do, even if the perfect target to merge to was found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V)