Deletion of Historical powers

Comment: while the deletion rationale might be flawed, (a category for this is just as bad) this is a big chunk of poorly sourced |original research on someone personal opinion what a "historical power" is, how the hell this survived since 2006 is beyond me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: No plausible match found in -REASON. Article satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: 3/4 of the keeps directly above are . The fact is, there's no need for an article to compile and restate information that exists elsewhere. That is why we have categories, as the nominator said. And since this article is nothing but such a compilation, and has no notability in its own regard, it ought to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)