Deletion of Ahmed Kamal (scientist)

Comment: If he were actually the vice-chancellor, he would have a case for #C6, as in the Indian system that means the head of the whole university. But pro-vice-chancellor is a lower-level administrative post that does not pass that criterion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The subject easily passes . Per https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/iict-makes-headway-in-cancer-treatment/article4881460.ece, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=ahmed+kamal+iict&oq=ahmed+kamal, https://selectbiosciences.com/conferences/biographies.aspx?conf=mci15&speaker=581862, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/results?searchtext=Author%3AAhmed%20Kamal, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0223523419307433#!, https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/?st=M&author=Kamal%20A, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm020124h, https://www.sharjah.ac.ae/en/Research/SIMHR/Documents/Profiles/Srinivasulu%20Vunnam.pdf and also being a Fellow of National Academy of Sciences, India http://www.nasi.org.in/fellows.asp?RsFilter=K. The article needs good amount of editing to show his works. But improvement is not a deletion criteria. This nomination clearly lacks 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BEFORE)