Deletion of Jack Arnold (politician)

Comment: fails both  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per  - please thank him for his service, but |it's snowing for Christmas. The |sourcing is terrible as I've ever seem - Ballotpedia, his own campaign website, blogs, some other candidates' website, and social media. He has 205 followers on Twitter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:SNOW||WP:RS)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: People do not get articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win. To qualify for an article without having to win the election and serve in Congress, he would have to either (a) show that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten him an article anyway, or (b) show such an unusually large volume and depth and range of coverage, expanding far ''beyond'' just what every candidate in every election can ''always'' show, that he would have a credible claim to being ''much more special'' than most other candidates in some way that would pass the |ten year test for enduring significance. This article is not passing either of those tests, however
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)