Deletion of Anthony Freeborn

Comment: doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Because the article was created and substantially edited only by {{User|acfreeborn}}, there is strong evidence that the entire article has  issues
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I've had a good try to find anything that might establish |notability for this one. He seems like a great guy and the tone of the entry is encyclopedic. Nonetheless, the one Google Books reference is trivial and there's nothing else of any substance that would justify a wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails to establish notability under . The Google Books item mentions him in passing regarding the final gunnery flight. Because the coverage in this source is not substantial, Freeman's article would require multiple independent sources to establish notability. The other source lists him as the husband of an alumna of a university in a where-are-they-now section of the university's alumni magazine. I can't speak to this particular magazine, but these are typically notices sent in by the subject him- or herself, and, by definition, primary. Per , primary sources are acceptable for content, but not in establishing notability. Freeman sounds like a fine, upstanding man, just not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)