Deletion of Princess Adrienne, Duchess of Blekinge (2nd nomination)

Comment: based on not meeting ,  and . None of the references address the subject directly and in detail, all seem very  coverage. Any claim to notability would rest on his family and . '''A 2yr old baby cannot be notable for anything they have done''' (usually not even dress themselves properly); any possible notability at this point would be from an event (unless its a pretty extraordinary life for a baby) and Wikipedia covers the event not the individual in these cases. As for the future, . there is no  CONTENT in the article. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NRV||WP:BASIC||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NINI||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC)

Comment: The nom hasn't advanced a valid deletion ground ("no foreseeable public role" is as much soothsaying as any other  violation), but other voters have.  Those claiming a GNG keep plainly misunderstand the GNG, which is ''not'' a hundred namedrops in however-reliable sources, but actual |''significant coverage'', to the ''subject'', in reliable sources.  This obviously has not been forthcoming, and to any voter who might respond "Well, how much can you say about a toddler?" I answer, "You're right.  You can't.  Which is why the subject does not qualify for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: or if needed merge, for the same reasons as I wrote about her brother. See , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:TOOSOON||WP:BARE)

Comment: to Princess Madeleine, Duchess of Hälsingland and Gästrikland per , as they only received SIGCOV for being born. Also, if the article is kept it should be renamed as there has been an explicit preference for not using those royal titles. Also, this person is a minor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)