Deletion of Bear versus bull

Comment: per violation of , , and the limits of common sense. The main problem with this article is that it discusses an actual conflict between a bear and a bull, whereas the only place where "bear vs. bull" has any notability is in political cartoons (bear market, bull market). The references reflect this: the verification for the claim that "the topic of bear vs. bull is popular" comes from two sources, which, respectively, are "Investopedia" and amazon.com. Other attempts at verification fail miserably; reports of bears attacking bull bison (which are just male bison, not actual bulls) are used as proof of bear vs. bull conflicts, and Native American folk tales are cited as factual sources. This article may also violate , since I doubt that instances of bears fighting bulls are broadly supported by any sort of reputable scholarship. As has been stated above, this article is useless. Anyone who wants to compare bears and bulls can look at the separate articles and do so on their own time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The nomination is quite mistaken.  Bull/bear fights were a popular spectator sport in California and there are numerous sources which document this in detail.  For example, see ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1QVZFQu01KcC&pg=PA152#v=onepage&q&f=false Bear-and-Bull Fights''.  The topic therefore passes the  and the page should not be deleted per our editing policy, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Some bull facts in parallel with some bear facts.  (and ) applies to the article, and  to Leopard1's argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH||WP:BUTITSTRUE)