Deletion of Matthew Vaughan

Comment: As far as I am able to tell the article fails  and more specifically , ,  and . I have not seen an argument for keeping it that doesn't boil down to . While I am prepared in some cases to overlook some minor deficiencies in criteria for inclusion, '''chucking all of our standards''' for someone who hasn't shown up on any RS sources or as far as we know had any meaningful roles before or since the one mentioned, is a bridge too far for me. I reaffirm my '''delete''' vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:IAR)

Comment: as an unsourced BLP.  I have found a few trivial mentions of him (for instance, saying that he appeared on the programme), but nothing that is significant or comprehensive as required by the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)