Deletion of Michael Lowry (actor)

Comment: Since IMO the subject does not meet , deletion under  is appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: The relevant guidelines are  apparently  and , along with 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:BIODELETE||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: If he were a decade-retired from some long-forgotten minor project, or an ex-child actor, deletion would be a done-deal. But he's http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0523350/ still active with four acting projects alone in the last two years, including three new TV series, and formerly had an important role (possessing its Ross Rayburn|own article in one of the biggest soaps of all time, ''One Life to Live''. He is thereby a smashing success at meeting 's ''"has had significant roles in multiple notable...television shows"''. It's very hard for me to see how he's not notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: per FloNight. I was waiting to see how others responded due to this being an OTRS issue. I saw that the article was the subject of some unwanted attention but that alone doesn't seem to be a criterion for deletion as pages can easily be protected. Since the subject barely passes , however, I was thinking "weak delete". FloNight's argument is persuasive so that puts me solidly into the delete camp, with the caveat that the work that gets mentioned at AfD doesn't always get done, so hopefully someone will take care of the merging of info into other articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)