Deletion of Wuwang Club fire

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT)

Comment: The ''guideline''  clashes explicitly with the ''policy'' , and the guideline  attempts to resolve this dichotomy by laying out the principles by which we judge whether an event is notable. It did receive some international press at the time, but a burst of news reports is not sufficient to show notability. The bulk of the news reports are immediately after the event, and are as such routine reporting in which the news media rehash wire stories and make no real analysis. I can find a total of two stories from October 2008, then none subsequently, and there is no mention of the event in any books on Google Books. The event had no apparent lasting effect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT)

Comment: Nom states that article "probably passes the GNG". Citing  seems to be a  to attempt to justify this proposed guideline. If so, an event in the PRC may not be the best test case for trying to locate ongoing coverage or depth of coverage. Having been corrected, if it passes the , sub-guidelines don't matter. In the same manner that an athlete who passes the  does not need to meet , and event doesn't need to pass S if it meets the general guideline for notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:POINT||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE||WP:EVENTS)