Deletion of Underdark

Comment: the article is sourced, just not properly sourced.  The smallest amount or research uncovers many books including quite a number of NYTimes Best Sellers, so it most certainly meets the requirements of . Plus according to , Fancruft is not a valid reason for deletion, but rather improvement.  Since there are no reasons remaining to support deletion the article needs to be kept, but improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION||WP:ITSCRUFT)