Deletion of Ultimatum

Comment: this page and the ersion of it pointed out above are purely , don't see how any editing of it can be anything but a definition of the word
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: Participants in this AfD may like to note that the nominator removed much of the article during the week or so before he nominated it. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ultimatum&oldid=545264800 This is the article just before he started doing so. Not that much better, but not quite so much of a |DICDEF. Of course, the real question in an AfD like this is not so much whether an article is currently a |DICDEF or not notable for some other reason, but whether it can be improved to avoid these problems. My feeling is that it can be, but I must admit that corresponding articles on other Wikipedia are a long way from showing this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:DICDEF)