Deletion of Transition of Caitlyn Jenner

Comment: back to Caitlyn Jenner per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SIZESPLIT)

Comment: I don't see why this needs to be a separate article — between her main  and the article about the television series, there's nothing noteworthy to say about this as a thing in its own right that couldn't be handled just fine in those two articles instead
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The place for the consideration of significant events in the life of people sufficiently notable for a biographical article is, in general, in that biographical article. There's no  reason to spall this off, and quite a few reasons, some of which have arguable BLP connotations, not to do so
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SIZESPLIT)

Comment: Not for any of the reasons stated by the nominator, which are flawed and factually incorrect (gender transition refers to far more than just SRS), but per : an article that has less than 40KB of readable prose does not warrant a split based on its length. Special:Permalink/675179524|Prior to the split, the main Jenner article only had 19KB of readable prose
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SIZESPLIT)

Comment: The transition is notable enough to merit its own article. While currently there is no section for public reactions to the transition, there should be such a section, and such a section would not be appropriate in Caitlyn Jenner's bio article. The nominator's argument that until Jenner has sex reassignment surgery the article constitutes  is beyond absurd. The transition has occurred regardless if the surgery took place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)