Deletion of Juni Cortez

Comment: in ignoring an invalid deletion rationale which would be used to delete fictional characters all over this project.  It will be a sad day when we have to say goodbye to articles on fictional Spock, James T. Kirk, Luke Skywalker, Darth Vader, Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck and the many others who have a notability based upon the projects which created them. Characters have real-world results in relationship to and because of their projects.  finds news and book results, but sources toward a topic based upon their projects will not deter anyone who be misreads the essay  (it's not a policy or guide) .  None of us will ever have Juni Cortez or Bugs Bunny or Captain Kirk knocking on our doors, but so what
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:INHERIT)

Comment: Nominator, your argument makes no sense. ''This fictional character has no independent notability outside of the films which it appears'' A fictional character would always have notability in and around the work that the character appears in. The article subject, the character has received significant coverage in multiple . This article passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Is  that fails the general notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: I see no policy-oriented arguments for deletion and no evidence of an actual  - WP policy requires that AfD noms proceed on the basis of the notability of the ''subject'', not as demonstrated in the ''article''. This character is discussed (not as a TRIVIALMENTION) in such books as ''Mediated Boyhoods'' and ''Home Movies''  and has a whole chapter in ''Critical Approaches to the films of Robert Rodriguez'', as well as another in a doctoral thesis by Victoria Kearley. This clearly meets WP:GNG, and I am getting tired of people citing WP:FANCRUFT as if it were a policy and as if it gave guidance on notability issues. In-universe style in articles is a  issue, not a policy-based ground for deletion. Also, it is for the nominator and the Delete voters to do the , FFS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:FIXIT)

Comment: It is not   . Character was arguable to ,main character in the first Spykids film as per the Google books source given in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)