Deletion of Ruxit

Comment: Admins, please note: COI/SPA alert. Better than your average spam entry, but not seeing any serious coverage. Blogs, mentions in passing, etc. I don't see how it passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Someone above says "if you try you can find good sources for the company", but I am unable to do so.  I guess it depends on how you define "good".  Someone else says "contributors just need to add more sources", but is apparently unwilling/unable to do so themselves.  Overall, I don't think this company meets criteria outlined at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Yes, it's a COI editor who has not followed wp:coi guidelines. And yes, there are a few possible RS, although there are non-RS that should be removed. (E.g. the Forbes articles are by contributors, thus close to being blog posts.) However, this is a product launched less than one year ago, and I think that we should extend  to the software category, with a guideline that states that an article consisting primarily of product launch announcements (which, even when in RS are a form of publicity) is just too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)