Deletion of Human trafficking in Angeles City

Comment: While there are some sources talking about Angeles City in particular, most of the sources discuss the Philippines '''generally''' (for instance, citation #27, Amnesty International). The current article fails  badly. It '''may''' be salvageable if rewritten extensively to deal with Human trafficking in the Philippines.  I have no idea why the author felt this particular city was important enough amidst the wider problems to merit its own article, but there certainly '''do not''' seem to be sufficient sources dealing with Angeles City '''in particular''' to support some of the claims. That, using the same example, Amnesty International has pointed to abuse of prostitutes by police in the Philippines should not be used to support a claim that police in Angeles City did so, unless cited much more carefully than the current article does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: I would echo some of the comments made by the editors that have posted a delete. I have followed this article since its inception and believe that it has always had some severe  problems. The edit wars and debates on this article have always been pretty intense. I would also like to point out the original author of the article posted the user talk notice they received about the AfD to the following user's talk pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: but tag with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)