Deletion of ProjektronBCS

Comment: the article does not assert that the software is notable.  The fact that it appears as a red link on List of project management software does not mean that it deserves an article.  The listing on the the list page should be delinked and ProjektronBCS should be deleted.  The possible existence of |reliable sources (which as yet don't appear in the article) would create a presumption of notability which would then be rebutted by the arguments made at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:MILL)

Comment: I proposed this for deletion.  Google News Archive search draws a blank on this article.  More importantly, this isn't really an article; almost all of the text is devoted to extolling its virtues --- ''The software covers multi-project management and includes features for time recording and quality management, resource and contact management, and provides a ticket system. The user interface can be redefined in terms of its content and can be adapted to the customer’s corporate design using stylesheets and customised graphics. Additional attributes and comment lists can be configured for each object. A variety of interfaces helps to integrate Projektron BCS into an existing IT environment'' --- and that makes it |unambiguous advertising as well, and |Wikipedia is not a free host for advertising brochures or software spec sheets.Note also that this article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ProjektronBCS&action=history sprung full blown, complete with infoboxes and categories, from the get go.  I suspect paid insertions when confronted with history like that.  At minimum, it seems that there's an offsite project out there, or at least a body of lore, offering instructions on how to insert articles on minor office software packages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:NOTCATALOG)