Deletion of Anissa Kate

Comment: sources do not meet  / . For example, refs added here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anissa_Kate&type=revision&diff=902868223&oldid=902853755 diff are tabloid trivia. ''GQ France'' is a passing mention. Etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Fails  with insufficient coverage by independent secondary sources.  Porn awards are not sufficient to satisfy WP:ENT. Also see my and Wolfowitz's comments above about the low quality of the references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: First of all, that's not true. Second, even if it ''were'' true, neither  nor  state this requirement; in fact, GNG explicity states: ''"There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected."'' And multiple sources indeed exist (and if anyone tries to argue that some of the sources aren't independent because they're pornography-related, remember that pornography is a ''category'', not the subject; Anissa Kate herself is the subject). '''Erpert
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:GNG)