Deletion of Tammie Jo Bonnell

Comment: The subject clearly passes  as there is extensive global coverage of her specifically in numerous quality sources such as the NYT and BBC.  There is detailed coverage of her in sources which pre-date the latest incident and so she has multiple claims to notability.  The details of her personal life are appropriate for a fully-rounded biography and the fact that such details are available further demonstrates her notability.  Note that she is being https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/southwest-airlines-flight-1380-audio-tammie-jo-shults-engine-explosion-hero-pilot-sucked-out-window-a8310126.html compared to Chesley Sullenberger and it would be iniquitous to delete a woman's article while keeping an equivalent man
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Looking at the Sully|Chesley_Sullenberger's Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chesley Sullenberger and recent news coming up about Shults, I believe the notability will establish soon as more and more news report has started to publish report for the subject and snow effect will take place. Hence vote keep per , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:SNOW)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: In my view, this is a classic example of  and ; in fact the second paragraph of the  description presents exactly what this person is: notable for a single event and likely to remain a low-profile individual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: As argued above, recognition for multiple accomplishments over a span of many years means that  is utterly beside the point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Simply 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)