Deletion of The Sheffield Private School

Comment: per , , , . While there may be a precedent for keeping unsourced school articles, there is no such consensus and it's contrary to policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:ORG||WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: You are daring and bold to nominate a school for deletion, {{U|Pinkbeast}}. Hold onto your hat. As to the merits of the nomination, I find it completely convincing. There are two unique sources for this article, one of which is the school's own website, which is not a |reliable source for anything besides verification of existence, and a school review website. There is no assertion of notability anywhere in the article. The subject unequivocally doesn't meet the bar of the GNG. But it's a school, so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as {{u|A Train}} says, you are being very brave nominating a school for deletion, considering the brigade of users who claim  makes all educational institutions inherently notable often shoot down such nominations.  However, and many users (including myself until last week), are unaware that an RfC a few months back overturned this consensus ({{oldid2|767023947|RfC_on_secondary_school_notability|link}}).  The nomination is convincing in its interpretation of GNG and indeed at flagging up the clear spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)