Deletion of The People's Cube

Comment: You know, I wasn't actually going to !vote here but the sheer misunderstanding of notability as it pertains to Wikipedia on this AFD is astounding. You all need to read  and you need to understand that this is not the place to air your grievances towards Wikipedia policy. This article does not meet notability as it is currently written. Sorry it doesn't. All the  arguments in the world is not going to change the facts of the matter. All the pleas from the website isn't going to fix the fact that there isn't enough independent reliable sources that discuss the topic in depth. There is not enough there to show that the website merits an independent Wikipedia article of its own. I'm sorry. Facts are facts. And the fact is, the website doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion at this time. That is not to say that it will ''never'' meet said criteria. Just that at the moment it does not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Not enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to |verify or |sustian article. Fails |Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and  Sources are all blogs or, at best ''Rush Limbaugh
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:NWEB)

Comment: No, no, and thrice no. Lacks reliable independent third-party coverage, and there is a clear attempt at |canvassing here to keep this article afloat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: fails  and the Snopes mentions don't amount to what we require under . Sorry, this isn't notable under Wikipedia policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . None of the article's current sources demonstrate notability and none of the article's statements are supported by a reliable source. There are a couple of reliable sources out there, but they only mention The People's Cube in passing and do not provide ''in-depth'' coverage. Worth noting that this article http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/the-people-s-cube-comes-to-wikipedia-t1704.html was started by someone affiliated with the site and included a lengthly "founder's bio", a copyright violation, that stuck around for almost 9 years. Canvassing has taken place both on their http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/urgent-people-s-cube-can-be-deleted-from-wikipedia-help-t19139.html website and https://twitter.com/ThePeoplesCube/status/815990773661528064 social https://www.facebook.com/thepeoplescube/ media sites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB)

Comment: The topic has not, as required by "|"Notability", "gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time."  There are few if any mentions in mainstream media and none in depth.  The "Snopes" article is about a rumor that started with the ''Cube'', but otherwise says nothing about it.  If readers want to know about the ''Cube'', they can go to their website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)