Deletion of Leslie V. Woodcock

Comment: An h-index of 26 in an avergage cited field passes rof#C1 comfortably
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per Boris. But also on the grounds mentioned by YoPienso: the basis for this article seems to solely Woodcock's GW-contrarian opinion. It appears to be a |coatrack for embellishing the count of "contrarian scientists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:coatrack)

Comment: unless stubbed into an actual biography and rewritten from scratch).  While it looks like Woodcock himself could probably clear some threshold of notability (as the term is used on Wikipedia), the present Wikipedia article completely fails to demonstrate that. Fundamentally, the problem is that the article is mistitled.  The article currently located at Leslie V. Woodcock isn't actually Woodcock's biography, but rather is An exhaustive and overly-detailed analysis of some comments that Woodcock made to a regional newspaper in April 2015.  The vast bulk of the article &ndash; including most of the brief lead, the two largest of the article's three body sections, and all of the ''See also''s &ndash; deal with climate change, his views thereon, and the (mostly-blogosphere-driven) reaction to them.  Meanwhile, his entire ''Early life and career'' &ndash; from getting his PhD in 1970 through to the present &ndash; gets two sentences and no actual description of his scientific work.  The article is a , not a biography, and flagrantly violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:WEIGHT)

Comment: I !voted "delete" above (now struck), but that was when the article was a climate-change-denial-and-rebuttal coatrack. This new version, avoiding any discussion of climate change, seems much more keep-worthy to me. I worry whether it can be maintained in this state, but maybe that's not an appropriate reason to delete any more. And as I already said in the earlier part of the discussion, I think he passes #C1 for his actual scientific accomplishments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)