Deletion of Wild about fruit Company

Comment: The sources above are either trivial in nature (other than perhaps Gannawarra Shire) or are paid spots such as the special in the Weekly Times and therefore not independent of the company.  The South Australian Government gazette merely lists its containers for which recycling refunds apply.  Not all mentions of a subject on a webpage meet  requirements for sources establishing notablility "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received '''significant''' coverage in '''reliable sources''' that are '''independent''' of the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails  and appears to be an advert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per #G11.  The article reads as a promotional piece.  Not sure why this option was refused in the first place.  Regardless it is not notable, privately held (which will make it difficult to source) and has no independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)