Deletion of Virginia Lewis (10th Kingdom)

Comment: And here we have the problem of Wikipedia reduced to one afd.  The article is contentious to teh community, and good faith efforts to edit the page become confrontational because neither party will compromise. The plot borders on entertainment as opposed to information and also borders on copyright violation, if not going beyond.  However, how likely is it the plot summary could be reduced?  If it can't be, and the article still proves contentious... we're basically just gaming the system and turning Wikipedia into a battleground by insistences on black and white absolutes which can't be entertained and respect . I pity the admin who has to close tis, because no-one is engaing with teh actual issues that face the article.  It's just become the latest venue to have a fight.  Best of luck with it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: and send to  and further source the individual per coverages in  http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Virginia+Lewis+%2810th+Kingdom%29&cf=all diff http://books.google.com/books?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Virginia%20Lewis%20(10th%20Kingdom)&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np diff. While the nomination seems a tad  and perhaps more suitable to discuiison on the article's talk page, coverage in RS is available, a few sources HAVE already been added, and saying that a rewrite ("''original research were removed as it should''") would reduce the article to "''plot details that fail''" does not account for the fact that what is being called  might itself be found in the sources available, making it NOT OR.  It is a pity that the article itself has not addressed all of these issues in what the nom considers a timely manner, but his timeline for improvement is |not Wiki's, and Wiki never demands that it itself be perfect. Bringing his concerns to AfD is laudable, and may now force improvement, but even that may not satisfy him ("''If few new legitimate elements were added to the article, I'd still argue to ''"), (Sorry, but I DID read the entire nomination summary). As for the name being an "''unlikely search term''", I found enough even through google to show that it is not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP||WP:RS||WP:TLDR||WP:OR||WP:DEADLINE||WP:AVOIDSPLIT)

Comment: The information in this article that isn't either |plot duplication of the parent article, |original research, or just flat out |unsourced, amounts to the following: Virginia Lewis is a fictional character and the main protagonist of the Hallmark Entertainment's, and NBC's 2000 cult miniseries ''The 10th Kingdom'' by Simon Moore.  She is played by Kimberly Williams.  Ron Wertheimer describes Virginia as "that plucky waitress...on her way to self-confidence." John Levesque writes that "Kimberly Williams is annoying yet somehow captivating as Virginia."The portrayer information, as well as the 17 words of critical reception, fit easily and handily into the ''10th Kingdom'' article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:OR||WP:V)