Deletion of Tiffany Trump (2nd nomination)

Comment: breadth of articles indicate  criteria is met. Article could use expansion, not deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)

Comment: She can be mentioned in her parents' articles, but nothing here suggests that she's earned a ''standalone'' BLP as an independent topic in her own right. Notability is |not inherited, and the strongest claim of standalone notability here is the number of followers she has on Instagram — but ''no'' number of followers on ''any'' social networking platform constitutes a notability freebie in and of itself if that's the ''most'' substantive notability claim you can come up with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Articles in http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/13/politics/who-is-tiffany-trump-donald-family-town-hall/ CNN and http://www.businessinsider.com/meet-tiffany-trump-the-wild-card-daughter-of-donald-trump-2015-7 Business Insider with her as sole subject, to take the two best, unambiguously satisfy the definition of . The  essay refers to arguments which disregard GNG in favor of personal relationships, which is not the case here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INHERITED)

Comment: The daughter of such a major world figure is likely to be somebody that people look for encyclopedic information on. It may be argued that it is |not inherited, but somebody that is going to be referenced - even if just in passing - in major news articles over the coming months and be subject to scrutiny justifies inclusion here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: huge amount of sources available, including the in-depth CNN piece currently there. Definitely meets the |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There's plenty of independent, in-depth sources available to indicate her notability and satisfy . My impression is that editors are getting caught up in the fact that she's one of Trump's younger children, and arbitrarily applying . She's been discussed in depth by a dozen different, reliable, high-profile sources. That's enough to meet our notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Declaring that someone is not notable is itself a BLP matter as such a claim is derogatory.  We should not be having procedural nominations of this sort, based on an offhand comment without |due process
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: to Donald Trump and/or Marla Maples. Just not seeing independent notability for stand alone article; notability is not |inherited
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)