Deletion of Victor Győry

Comment: Contrary to the opinions expressed above there is absolutely not indication of ''significant coverage'' here.  "Significant coverage" requires multiple sources discussing the subject in detail. Two psychology text books mention this event anecdotally and a handful of ''local'' newspapers reported on it.  This is hardly an event of note to be reported on by an encyclopedia.  The fact that it is a  makes it absolutely clear that it should be deleted at once.  On a sidenote the entry was in an atrocious state and tagged as such for years.  Why aren't people "rescuing" bad entries before they make it to AfD?  That would be a much more productive exercise.  Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Classic , despite the lipstick-on-a-pig article rename.  We have a story about ''one person'' who got a bit of press of ''one event''.  This is a person who would otherwise be completely unknown to the public save for this unfortunate circumstance of involuntary commitment, and he certainly has not sought publicity in the aftermath; no book tours, no visits to Oprah's couch.  Exercise a bit of editorial discretion and snip this tawdry crap out of the project, please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: both title as per Robofish. The case is already written up in the CCHR article and certainly fails  - it's remembered by nobody but the CCHR, a separate article would be pushing their POV far too far. Cyclopia, I don't understand why you think this is a suitable article, we don't decide on inclusion simply by robotically counting references
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)