Deletion of Black Tokyo

Comment: WP:N and  say that articles that rely on the existence of publications for their notability should discuss the subject in a non-trivial way and that more of such sources should exist. Since the Japan Times is the only publication independent from the blog to discuss it in any significant detail, it fails the notability guidelines. _
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily passes  due to its |reliable sources such as http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nc20090325br.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: I've just had another look at , which tells us ''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. / "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content.'' Addressing X directly in detail is not the same as mentioning X. Which sources address Black Tokyo in detail
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This website has been mentioned by reputable sources, per . I see no reason to delete it. However, I do think the page needs some clean-up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: None of the sources do anything more than brief mentions of the blog, so it does not pass  (which says it has to have SIGNIFICANT coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It satisfies  for ''Reliable'' and ''Significant coverage'' sources, as well as 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The press articles used as refs are about a racist Japanese phone ad, and only briefly quote the operator of the BlackTokyo blog. They are not significant or substantial enough to satisfy |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: But  is just another name for , which I'd brought up earlier. Yes, there are reliable sources among these. And yes, I'd say that the profile on the ''Japan Times'' website (a profile of which I hadn't been aware till HeiRenXuesheng brought it up below) is an increment toward significance. The site has one write-up in the website of a newspaper of some importance (and conceivably in the newspaper itself as well, though I haven't yet investigated this). Find one or two other such profiles, or discussion or detailed description of the site, and you'd persuade me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)