Deletion of B. H. Carroll Theological Institute

Comment: If notability isn't doubted by you then explain how it passes ? Around 200 google hits and article asserts nothing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: As a Jew, I cannot possibly understand all the nuances that went into creating this school. But a thorough read through the articles regarding the school shows that it is quite genuine and was created to meet a perceived need for a new type of school. That a new school is not accredited by a well-known accrediting agency does not make it a diploma mill. Nor do I find it at all unusual that the mainstream press hasn't latched on to this school as a subject for articles that would confer the notability so many feel it would be given. Despite the lack of traditional news coverage, the articles provided and available online provide clear satisfaction of  . I find the use of "scare quotes" and other derogatory suppositions regarding its nonaccreditation making it a suspected diploma mill to be a staggering violation of . I have few doubts regarding the notability of this institution, but many regarding those who are so quick to delete it based on entirely unsupported suppositions and original research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:AGF)

Comment: as failing  (if any more detailed evidence of the institute being important in the intra-Baptist struggles that made it into non-Baptist press then I may consider changing my attitude
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)