Deletion of Jamie Yager (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails  and doesn't meet any other notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA)

Comment: With only 1 top tier fight of the 3 needed, he certainly fails .  While I think the  closing admin made a mistake by closing the previous discussion as "no consensus" (it looked like a delete consensus to me), I think it's strange to reopen the discussion so soon afterwards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA)

Comment: Jamie now has enough  with my additions to pass the  easily. It would be a travesty if this page were deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES||WP:GNG)

Comment: Only one notable fight so he fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA)

Comment: had exhibition fights on Spike's TUF as well as his pro UFC fight. Passes  and . You might want to also see  in regards to his notability gained via TUF and his UFC loss to Rich Antonnito . Please also see  for a compelling essay noting reasons why the TUF fights these guys had should count. also has notable refs http://bleacherreport.com/articles/401316-jamie-yagers-management-responds-to-tweets-about-tito-ortiz here, http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/blog/cagewriter/post/Loser-on-TUF-tears-up-Tito-Ortiz-on-Twitter-or-d?urn=mma,245479 here, and http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/blog/cagewriter/post/In-chance-at-redemption-Yager-bails-again-as-At?urn=mma,249808 here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:TUF)

Comment: He clear fails .  However, there is barely enough coverage to pass GNG, even with several dead links in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA)

Comment: These can pass  as per . Please review Jamie's latest . Oh, and MMAjunkie is apart of USATODAY
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:SOURCES)