Deletion of James Z. Wang

Comment: no |reliable sources are given to establish |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE)

Comment: I don't think the CAREER is a sufficiently notable award as to pass  but I'm more impressed with his citation counts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: no opinion on notability per |our guidelines on biographic articles at this time, but it bears pointing out that the ''Keep'' !voters above, excepting {{user|Shalom}}, would appear to have a |conflict of interest here and appear to be part of a group of editors creating a walled garden on academics at Pennsylvania State University|PSU
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COI)

Comment: Thank you for your trimming, DGG. Editing the article frequently partly because of my unfamiliarity with wiki editing as a novice, and partly because I am keeping remedying problems in  and WP:PROF. As for some people who think it is not enough in , I would like to cite the following statement in : "In general, the most reliable publications are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses." I have listed representative peer-reviewed journals and two books published by RESPECTED publishing houses to support . I think it has met the criteria.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: CoIs from above editors lead me to believe that this article was created in bad faith. If that wasn't enough, it doesn't assert notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)