Deletion of Astronauts of Antiquity

Comment: per  not being a compelling reason for deletion. --Happy editing!  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN)

Comment: This page contains a lot of marketing language and repeated links to commercial sites (). The author clearly has a conflict of interest in posting it (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:COI)

Comment: The band clearly doesn't meet  so the question becomes, does it meet the .  Right now the answer appears to be no, but only barely.  Also, I would recommend that contributors treat this AfD as a discussion of the notability of the ''subject of the article'' rather than the article.  This cuts two ways.  It means that we can't just consider the article's current state (possible reliable sources that exist '''now''' but aren't referenced in the article must be considered) but we also shouldn't attempt to turn this into a referendum on a ''different subject''.  Any other subject should be treated separately.  This is a matter of fairness to the article creators, the participants in the AfD and the subject of the article itself.  Any other use of the term "Astronauts of Antiquity" should be considered as distinct from this term.  If someone feels that it is appropriate to create an article on http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Astronauts+of+Antiquity%22+-band+-music+-artists+-artist+-disc+-myspace+-performance+-Digable+-album+-wikipedia&btnG=Search something else, then it is surely better to start a page Astronauts of antiquity (something else) and move the page to Astronauts of antiquity after this AfD is over than to create an article about an unrelated subject over this article while a community discussion about the article is ongoing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG)