Deletion of Project Trust

Comment: No in-line references" is not a -REASON|reason for deletion. Advertising would be if the article was "without any relevant or encyclopedic content", but that's not the case here; it may need some attention in this regard, but it's hardly |unsalvageable. Copyright violation of  a website would be if there was ''evidence'' that the whole article, including previous versions in its history, was pasted from a website, but the nominator presents no such evidence and the article has a seven-year history, including https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_Trust&diff=647383632&oldid=619977645 a complete rewrite in February 2015. Subject is notable, as evidenced by significant coverage in ''The Glasgow Herald'' https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2507&dat=19891221&id=yDlAAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YVkMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2813,957797&hl=en and ''The Daily Telegraph'' http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/10201359/Goodbye-Gap-yah-hello-good-works.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:TNT)