Deletion of Donkpedia

Comment: An encyclopedia that covers poker is certainly appealing, just like an Conservapedia|"encyclopedia" that avoids articles about naughty body parts, but Donkpedia does not yet seem to have the substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources needed to satisfy the |guideline for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: utterly non-notable and fails  by miles.  I also dispute that simply claiming to be the biggest of something is not in itself a claim of notability... even if that's true, in this case it's still extremely tiny, less than one-tenth the size of the smallest wiki on http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_wikis meta's list of wikis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: as failing  at this time. Also looks like a lot of |original research and use of |primary sources. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOR||WP:PSTS)