Deletion of Leandra Medine

Comment: and tag any concern. Actually she passes  and there are many reliable sources about her. Promotional tone can be corrected by anybody
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly. Coverage from Cosmopolitan, Elle, the New York Times, Forbes, Business Insider, Huffington Post ... over the course of 4 years ... come on. This is not in doubt. Deletion, as they say, is Wikipedia:NOTCLEANUP|NOTCLEANUP; or for those who don't like that essay, , which is presumably the reason for deletion people are grasping for who are writing "overly promotional";  says "Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content" - whatever you think of the promotion, there is plenty of encyclopedic content. If you think it's too promotional, make it less so, but the subject has clearly shown itself to be notable, so per our policies, should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL4||WP:DEL4)

Comment: There does seem to be some genuine coverage which would ensure  is attained, and it is clealy promotional at the moment. I would think a heavy copyedit is needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: appears to fail , I might change my mind if someone showed it could be fixed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)