Deletion of 33 Snowfish

Comment: per the reviews/coverage identified above by Tokyogirl79; subject appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: The trade reviews are dodgy, but there has been no official consensus on whether or not they would be considered trivial coverage. Even without those, the book has still been reviewed or mentioned by several literary journals and was made an ALA pick. It's light, but there's just enough to where I'd say this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: There are sources, but no significant coverage and most sources only provide a basic plot summary. It also fails to meet any of the criteria in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)