Deletion of Satish Sugars

Comment: It is possible that a  article could be achieved by stripping out or rebalancing the article material which sings the praises of the company with the other coverage which I mentioned above. However even if volunteer effort was to be committed to such remedial work, it is not clear that what would be left would be more than a note of a  company. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (:WP:NPOV||:WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: there are no independent references in the article, and it is promotional, violating 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: To the extent that coverage mentioning this firm is available, it tends to be about concerns about concentrated politico-economic power and payment levels to farmers (http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/Satish-Sugars-announces-additional-payment-for-sugarcane/article14435712.ece, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/karnataka-cms-close-associate-and-excise-minister-satish-jarkiholi-quits-cabinet/articleshow/46038470.cms). Of such matters, there is no mention in the article, which reads like a corporate website and is a good illustration of why articles written by connected contributors tend to be deficient in meeting 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (:WP:NPOV)