Deletion of Getit

Comment: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for |lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be '''eligible for |soft deletion''' at the end of its 7-day listing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: As with some other recent AfDs, I am wary of those whose nomination may be problematic, as with the blocked account in this case. Under the 2012 AfD, editors with ''keep'' opinions pointed to several media items; from the descriptions, some may also meet the current  but they are not now available online. Searches now find material mainly about the 2013 acquisition (https://www.vccircle.com/bootstrapping-revival-growth-2 - routine coverage under ) and the company's closure in 2016, such as https://www.businesstoday.in/current/corporate/6-real-reasons-behind-ask-me-shutting-down/story/236683.html "Six real reasons behind AskMe shutting down", Business Today 31 August 2016. Although that is a news-driven analysis, it might also contribute towards 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NCORP||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:NCORP)