Deletion of Chi-Ming Chow

Comment: He meets  criterion 7, example 14. ("Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: ndash; Very simply put, there is no secondary support for the article.  If the article was about  "Staving off flu lowers heart attack risk: study" or "Immigrants more likely to suffer heart problems", the references could be used to support the article, but the article is about an individual.  Granted, the references quote the individual, but that is the extent of the support.  If one reads , one will see it states, "Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article, and should be appropriate to the claims made. If a topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."  All the references do is support that the individual has been quoted in regards to the subject matter in the articles.  I'll ask the question, how does being quoted in a few articles support |notability?  As far as I can tell, it does not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: Please note that academics and scholars are not held to the requirements of  because it is so rare for academics to be written ABOUT; instead they are judged by the impact they have had on their field as per . I believe Dr. Chow meets those requirements. He has many articles at Google Scholar and they are cited a lot; he is also frequently cited as an expert in the lay press
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ACADEMIC)