Deletion of Grofers

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  per a review of |available sources. Source ''examples'' include, ''but are not limited to'' those listed below. Promotional tone can be addressed by |copy editing the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NEXIST||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: wikipedia is not a  of marginally notable companies. The only purpose for the article to exist is to promote the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: There are more than |enough sources for this entity to surpass  standard. Almost all of the sources being reviewed in here are English-language ones; there are many in regional languages as well (mind that top-2 largest circulating newspaper of India are List of newspapers in India by circulation|Hindi newspapers, there are 3 in top-5
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grofers&type=revision&diff=741814867&oldid=741661896 completely and totally rewrote this article prior to the AFD being filed. The charge that this article contains "clear attempts at obtaining investors and clients" is absurd. In no way is my rewrite intended to help this company obtain investors or clients. I could care less about the company's success, and I'd be awfully surprised if a venture capitalist ever turned to Wikipedia for ideas on where to invest. This article meets  and , which is why I think it should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)