Deletion of Ma malakat aymanukum

Comment: though honestly, the violation of  seems more serious here. The opening line and much of the beginning is cited directly with the Qur'an itself - a telltale sign of original research by editors who believe they've discovered something which they must inform the world of. Beyond that, the citations are actual articles and papers but they're a mish-mash of different things which seem to be placed in order to evoke some sense of notability/legitimacy. In reality, it's a premise being suggested with citations selected to push the point of view
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The article is of poor quality indeed and it needs to be cleaned for OR and other issues. However, the article should be revised, but not deleted. ''Ma malakat aymanukum'' is much discussed in the historical scholarship of various Fiqhs of Islam, as well as in the English literature (http://idosi.org/wjihc/wjihc3(4)13/3.pdf 1, http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sjsj12&div=34&id=&page= 2, p. 202 of {{ISBN|978-0674050594}} by Harvard University Press, p. 6 of {{ISBN|978-0195053265}} by Oxford University Press, {{ISBN|978-0674810839}}, etc). The article topic is thus notable per . The article does not meet the deletion criterion stated in -REASON. Wikipedia's deletion policy page, at  states, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:DEL||WP:ATD)

Comment: the article's topic in and of itself is important and deleting it would not be in the spirit of an encyclopedia. Rather, the original proposer of this deletion may want to improve it if he/she can and discuss it. As someone above has said, just because it is allegedly used to excuse "violent rapes by extremists" does not mean it should be deleted, but improved to meet  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV)

Comment: meets  and, contra arguments advanced above, just as there are WP articles on The Bible and slavery and Christian views on slavery, so there can be articles on both Islamic views on slavery and this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)