Deletion of Asian fetish (2nd nomination)

Comment: As previous editors have mentioned, the article contains some small amounts of  and {{toofewopinions}}. However, this can easily be overcome by removing unsourced statements and replacing them with a larger range of statements from academic and literary sources, in order to promote  and  as per Wikipedia policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Ok, there seems to be some heated discussion on the talk page, and a small bit of edit warring (although I've seen much much worse) but neither of those justify deletion.  Moreover, a quick perusal of the talk pages suggests to me that the nominator has been involved in said warring and at the very least has several edits on the article.  Of course, editing an article does not preclude someone from later nominating it AfD, but I have to say that I find it incongruous that someone feels it's worth their time to edit an article and make several discussions on the Talk page, and then later things the article is worthy of removal. But aside from all that, this seems like a reasonably-sourced phenomenon in the literature, and thus satisfies  and doesn't break 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)