Deletion of Rasmus Højengaard

Comment: Nomination is a |poor argument. The article is referenced, but to primary sources and interviews, which are generally not by themselves sufficient to show notability. On the other hand he does have a strong-ish CV. I'd like to see better sources, but I couldn't find any in Google News Archive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTKNOWIT)

Comment: I'm seeing a lot of "I thinks" and  instead of genuine arguments. None of the "Keep" votes have validly supported their viewpoint
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)