Deletion of Assim al-Hakeem

Comment: Needs improvement but no question that the subject has been covered in multiple mainstream media sources on multiple occasions and therefore meets notability guidelines. Closer should note that nominator appears to have https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/SWL36 selectively canvassed editors about this AfD in breach of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS)

Comment: when you take away the dozens of self published sources, affiliated sources, social media and blogs there is almost nothing to show notability. This is one of the worst cases of |refbombing I've seen for a while
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: I searched for him in the two largest English language papers in Jeddah, and found nothing.  Current sourcing is insufficient - fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject appears to fall below the relevant notability guidelines. There is some material written about him on blogs and discussion forums, as well as in self-published books lacking editorial oversight and Wikipedia mirrors. None of these are reliable sources. I don't see this as being sufficient per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per nomination. This is |poorly sourced |promotional verbiage hoping to |make it into |Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:PROMO||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:5P1)