Deletion of Alex Fevola

Comment: She gets extensive coverage, and it might have started because of her husband but then there is a focus that moved over her. The Herald Sun and news.com.au feature her heavily, and while they might not be the best sources they are not the only ones (while others are not plenty either), and the news hits are easily 10 pages of different items, spanning about 5 years. While notability is not inherited, moving from a description as a relative of Brendan Favola to a proper |biography may be perfectly in order once the information starts becoming of a nature totally unrelated to her husband
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: as per  '' a relative of a celebrity should only have their own independent article if and when it can be reliably sourced that they have done something significant and notable in their own right''. what has Alex Fevola done notable in her own right? none of the keep voters have demonstrated what Alex Fevola has done notable in her own right
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Which article demonstrates her notability?  The one titled ''Birthday girl Alex Fevola parties until dawn'', or ''Alex Fevola confronts Lara over alleged tryst''?  Trivial articles serving prurient interests are not enough to establish notability, and ''Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard...'' which this does not meet, nor do the sources.  |Wikipedia is not the National Enquirer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSCANDAL)

Comment: I think this is a fundamental misunderstanding of , which is an argument to ''avoid in deletion discussions''. But nobody's saying "Brendan Fevola is notable and therefore Alex must be notable as well." Alex Fevola's notability comes - like all notability - from significant coverage in multiple independent sources. We must be careful to avoid the fallacy that says "if someone is related to someone notable then they cannot be notable themselves." It doesn't matter at all ''why'' the media reports on her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)