Deletion of Violet Edwards (politician)

Comment: County commission is not a level of office that guarantees automatic inclusion rights under  — to be notable for this, she would have to show |reliable source coverage in real media, of a volume and depth and geographic range that clearly marked her out as significantly ''more'' notable than most other county councillors. It's not enough to just show a couple of  hits in her own county's local media — and the overwhelming majority of the sources here are bad ones that are not support for notability at all, such as |blogs and her own campaign website and her own social networking profiles and her staff profiles on the self-published websites of her own employers and raw tables of election results. And no, "first insert underrepresented minority group here to do this not inherently notable thing in her own county" is not an instant notability freebie, either — if being elected to a county council had made her the first black woman officeholder in the entire history of the entire United States, then she would probably have a case for inclusion as a historic first, but if her firstness is limited to her own county, then that ''doesn't'' fulfill the "significantly more notable than most other county councillors" test in and of itself. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced much, much, much better than this.Also worth noting that the creator previously tried to make this happen through the AFC process at Draft:Violet Edwards, and then after the second rejection at AFC they just bypassed that process and directly created this in articlespace ''instead'' of attempting to improve and resubmit the AFC draft any further — which, needless to say, is not how the AFC process works
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:MILL||WP:BLOGS)