Deletion of List of products endorsed by Jennifer Lopez

Comment: I think  applies here, or perhaps . It just doesn't seem to be encyclopedic material. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTADVOCATE)

Comment: I cannot see this as being anything other than a backdoor approach to avoid 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERT)

Comment: Actually my reason is clearly valid and it does look like a list of |cruft that is why I added the AFD tag. I'm not trying to dicourge
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT)

Comment: A simple  applies here.  An eneclopedia is neither an advertising agency nor a platform from which to sell product like a carnival salesman
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: backdoor ; a list for the sake of a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: per Ed this article isn't going anywhere encyclopaedic.I would also think  and  apply here.These products are being advertised on the basis that they are associated with J-Lo. An article re-affirming that connection only serves to further advertise the products - the list can never be neutral because is no real commentary on the significance (both for good and bad) of this association.A single paragraph in Jennifer Lopez could cover the key points neutrally - If the list is to serve some navigational purpose then a separate argument could be made for a "Products associated with Jennifer Lopez" Category instead - it wont necessarily be accepted but it could be made
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:NNPOV)