Deletion of Christian Vision for Men

Comment: The best claim to notability I can find is a BBC News article talking about a gender divide in the church that mentions teh research done by CVN. There may also be a case with the number of churches affiliated to CVM. The big problem with this article, however, is that it's so heavily promotional that even if notability was established, you'd probably have to delete the whole lot and start again to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: As a UK Christian man I might support this organisation if I came across it (which I haven't), but I fully agree that there is a total lack of sources meeting . I found a Telegraph article and a pay-only Times article that refer to CVM, but they seem to be about the issue of men leaving church rather than the organisation itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS)

Comment: This is a very promotional article, but if references existed to satisfy , the relevant notability standard, that problem could be fixed by editing to get rid of the promotional tone. The Baptist Times article is about their survey more than it is about the organization, but it provides some support for notability. The ref to Scripture Union is a dead link. The rest of the articles and references are to blogs which might not satisfy "independent and reliable sources," including a number of "partner" organizations or activites of the subject organization
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)