Deletion of Brittany Raymond

Comment: and flag for reference improvement. For the record, it is ''not'' necessary for an entertainer to have ''multiple'' nominations for an entertainment award before being nominated for an entertainment award counts as a claim of notability — ''one'' nomination is enough if properly sourced. The word "multiple" only becomes relevant to  if the notability claim amounts to "notable because she's been in stuff", in which case we do require multiple stuffs — but it is ''not'' relevant if the notability claim is "notable because she's been nominated for a top-level award in her field", in which case ''one'' nomination is enough so long as it's properly sourced. And, for that matter, even if a person ''did'' require "multiple" nominations to qualify as notable because nominations, she ''does'' have multiple nominations: for some reason Zanimum just mentioned her nomination at the 5th Canadian Screen Awards in 2017, while ''missing'' the fact that she was nominated in the same category at the 3rd Canadian Screen Awards in 2015 as well. So even if notability because award nominations ''did'' require ''multiple'' nominations, she ''has'' multiple nominations.I grant that the original reference for her 2017 nomination was problematic, and not even just because it's a community weekly newspaper and not a major market daily — it's also an article that merely happens to glancingly namecheck Brittany Raymond's existence in a "other local actors who also got nominations" coda to an article whose ''primary'' subject is Simu Liu, not an article that's even remotely ''about'' Brittany Raymond. I've replaced that source with a more appropriate one, and added a couple of other sources as well — it still needs ''more'' sources before it can get a quality class promotion to ''good'' article status, so it should still be flagged for referencing improvement, but the base notability claim ''is'' now properly covered off
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)