Deletion of Spider-Man 4 (2nd nomination)

Comment: I do see the sources cited from reliable publications and many websites have talked about a confirmation for the next Spider-Man series e.g. IMDB. However, when I did a Google search, MSNBC said something like "No stars, no Spider-Man 4". Also, Sony has not mentioned anything about Spider-Man 4 on their website. So for now, its just |crystal ballism and there should be some confirmation more or less that the film will be made
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The notion that there was any sort of consensus to keep this page deleted at DRV is not accurate at all.  Xoloz did not lose his objectivity (in favor of what anyways? his pro-Spider-man 4 bias?) and the claim that he ignored the DRV is both untrue and unfair.  To the subject at hand, I disagree about the interpretations of  above.  Crystal says articles should not contain "unverified speculation."  This article does not -- it contains a confirmed statement from the head of Sony Pictures that they intend to create more Spider-man movies, as well as additional information from reliable sources.  In other words, this is an excellent example about how Wikipedia should handle articles on movies in development.  There's not one single sentence in this article that's misleading, unsourced or in any way inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per . I've heard nothing, and they've said nothing confirming that it is even thought to be in production
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: copied essentially from speculation, can't see how it passes |CRYSTAL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: to Spider-Man film series#Future per .  No one from the first three films have renewed their contracts, and no production start date has been set.  There has been only talk about development, and this does not equate actual production.  Sufficient information exists at Spider-Man film series#Future.  This article fails #1 because the film is not "almost certain" to take place.  To avoid making this a subjective argument, I would like to point to the history of ''Spider-Man'', which had been in development hell since the late 1980s.  ''Superman Returns'' was not made until 20 years after the last film.  ''Batman Begins'' was not made until 8 years after the last film.  The following projects and their years are how long they have been stuck in development, despite announcements being made and having franchise potential: ''Captain America'' (2000), ''Clash of the Titans'' remake (2003), ''Deathlok'' (2001), ''Ender's Game'' (2002), ''The Giver'' (1994), ''He-Man'' (2004), ''Hot Wheels'' (2003), ''Prince of Persia: Sands of Time'' (2004), ''Rendezvous with Rama'' (1997), ''Ronin'' (1998), ''Shazam!'' (2002), ''Sub-Mariner'' (2004), ''Terminator 4'' (2003), ''Y: The Last Man'' (2003).  Headlines for these can be seen at my
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: This is a result of people who 'just don't like it' when they got the  explanations over at SM3's talk page. repeatedly. This pretty much counts as a content fork
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)