Deletion of Visual Arts Collective

Comment: per . Every single source (and all of them local at that) seems to mention it in context of an event about falling afoul of some liquor laws. There is no independent indept coverage of the gallery beyond this single event. In addition, art galleries need to pass  which is not happening here. There needs to be in-depth secondary sources which are independent of the gallery itself. It is also problematic to use local media in these cases ( applies) as they tend to disproportionately report on incidents of local interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:AUD)

Comment: Fails .  Little depth  of coverage in secondary sources, except for the two sources cited in the article, which are thin articles in local media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)