Deletion of Gravel Switch, Livingston County, Kentucky

Comment: Meets |notability, |verifiability, |reliable sources, and POV|neutral point of view. The topic meets  including ''significant coverage''. Several historical documents mention this area by name, mention where it was, mention what products came from it, and how those products were used. Though the mentions were brief, they were neither trivial nor a passing mention. The sources are ''reliable'', are ''secondary sources'', and are ''independent of the subject''. I'm sure the original reason to PROD or AfD this article was because one could not SEE anything on a current satellite view, and a cursory google search of "gravel switch" brought up nothing. However, now that there has been some researching and article improvement, we've discovered that there are sources, including ample maps, SHOWING that this place was populated, active and commercial. The products from this area were mentioned in several of the citations, along with mentioning the name of this place and where it sits in relation to other known places. That the TVA built a dam and flooded the nearby area, causing the railroads to re-route their line ''right through'' the old operating area of Gravel Switch, doesn't negate that the place existed as an area (not simply a railroad switch that has since been removed). As for a merge argument, the article subject doesn't really fit into any other article. I say Keep because the arguments for deletion don't hold water. (Pun intended... because of the new lake
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: to Grand Rivers, Kentucky. There no requirement whatsoever that content about a city is limited to that only within legal limits: coverage of area geography, businesses, and history is regularly included with the nearest city, and this is the best way to consolidate relevant information for readers, seeing that Grand Rivers is mentioned as the relevant community in sources. Citation review: https://books.google.com/books?id=lZYlAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA658&lpg=PA658&dq=Gravel+Switch+rail+yard#v=onepage&q=Gravel%20Switch%20rail%20yard&f=false passing mention, https://books.google.com/books?id=dtFP6Z7nALoC&pg=PA626&lpg=PA626&dq=tennessee+river+gravel+switch+rail#v=onepage&q=tennessee%20river%20gravel%20switch%20rail&f=false passing mention, https://trn.trains.com/~/media/files/pdf/ebooks/thesurvivors_smallsize.pdf does not mention Gravel Switch, https://www.mindat.org/loc-142572.html database entry about quarry, https://books.google.nl/books?id=EDW2hvyndDUC&pg=PA191&lpg=PA191&dq=vulcan+mineral+grand+river+operations&source=bl&ots=mL6b5ehZB0&sig=ACfU3U3Obox4VCA9BPM9CZvUU1MteM3MLQ&hl=nl&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjz7MrbyMTpAhVQ-qQKHVTMC-cQ6AEwAXoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=vulcan%20mineral%20grand%20river%20operations&f=false brief blurb of Grand Rivers quarry as a producer of crushed stone, https://books.google.nl/books?id=ChA0AQAAMAAJ&pg=RA10-PA7&lpg=RA10-PA7&dq=reed+crushed+stone+grand+rivers+rail&source=bl&ots=dMeDYfxNXV&sig=ACfU3U3YrIVskMEWXKgQuH59G2-Nl8xAMw&hl=nl&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjPuvTns8PpAhUN6aQKHXKwAaUQ6AEwAXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=reed%20crushed%20stone%20grand%20rivers%20rail&f=false passing mention of quarry. I am simply baffled how this possibly passes GNG or even . This article synthesizes together a former rail switch and the quarry terminal now nearby, using original research to claim "Gravel Switch is an area", rather than it just being former name of the spur line and its then-gravel operation as indicated by the sources. There is no evidence at all this is the name of the quarry terminal area or railroad through-line today: the two sources with passing mentions of the spur switch fail to use it that way
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)