Deletion of Squallis Puppeteers

Comment: Important puppeteer troupe for which there is not enough  material to write an |attributable article on the topic. The only  information independent from and about Squallis Puppeteers is ''Louisville: The Crowning: A Story of Birth,'' ProQuest|Dialogue, February 28, 2001, Volume 24; Issue 1, Page 42, which is not enough  material to write an |attributable article on the topic. There are 10+ newspaper notifications about their up coming performances, which is not useful on Wikipedia. Thus, the topic does not meet Wikipedia |notability guidelines and cannot meet Wikipedia Wikipedia:List_of_policies#Content_and_Style|article policy standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:A||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:A||WP:N)

Comment: Their notability seems to be very, very isolated, and while I'm all for inclusion of organizations at the "cusp" of , there really doesn't seem to be any notability beyond a few passing references, one student newspaper review, and a trade organization review. If they had attracted some significant regional attention, I would think differently, but I think their notability, such as it is, is far too narrow for inclusion right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I have a hard time imagining how anyone can actually look at the newspaper articles Fixer has linked for us and still suggest deletion.  They include genuine articles about the group, and ''not'' just notices of upcoming gigs.  While I completely reject the quaint notion that non-profit groups should get a free pass through  (somehow I can't find any mention in official policy about how Nice Groups are exempt), the fact is they pass on the merits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)