Deletion of Edwina (M*A*S*H)

Comment: and add more real world context and criticism, this one needs to be expanded not deleted. We need to avoid a bias toward recentism. I don't see any difference between this MASH episode and a random Seinfeld episode, for example: The Postponement. Seinfeld has episodic plot outlines as well as season summaries. We also need to move the images to the seasonal outlines. And prophylacticly if your going to cite  please keep in mind the newer 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:DONTQUOTEPERSONALESSAYSASPOLICY)

Comment: These episodes are mentioned in numerous books and notable sites, which I have added to the other 24 articles up for deletion, and I will add here shortly. Per , this should have been discussed on the Talk:List_of_M*A*S*H_episodes_(Season_1) instead of a mass deletion spree of 24 articles,  causing unnecessary work and drama.In regards to guidelines about this, , a proposed guideline to address episodes  failed for the third time.  is in an edit war, with editors removing the section, so much so the page has been protected for 2 weeks.A lot can be learned from the previous attempts to delete the South Park episodes, frustrated editors restarted  Wikipedia:WikiProject South Park to make South Park episodes good and featured articles, and assure that all episodes exceed wikipedia guidelines. There is already a dormaint Wikipedia:WikiProject M*A*S*H which can be restarted. If South Park episodes have the potential to become featured articles, surely M*A*S*H episodes do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:FICT||WP:PLOT)