Deletion of We are the 99%

Comment: to We are the 99% (slogan) or similar.  As per editor MPS above, the failure to differentiate this article from others would likely result in the article becoming |"coatrack" for a more general article about the Occupy Wall Street movement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Slogan meets guidelines of  in that there is significant coverage, widespread usage of slogan establishes presumption that subject is suitable for inclusion.  Slogans can stand on their own as historical artifacts outside events that created them.  See Where's the beef?, D'oh!, Sí se puede, Read my lips: no new taxes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Merits perhaps a line in the main "occupy" article, but not more. A stand-alone article really is |too much. Given all the current brouhaha, this will probably be kept, so someone should revisit this in another couple of weeks when no-one will care anymore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: This is beyond retarded, we do not use an encyclopedia for the promotion of political catchphrases.  If there is legitimate, in-depth coverage of the phrase as a a standalone entity, e.g. Read my lips, I am not a crook, then that is another thing.  None of the sources address it ''as a phrase'', they cite it and then cover the more general aspects of the Wall Street protest...this is the epitome of -driven editing run amok
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: I have put the article into question a bunch of times since it was created and knew it would eventully be sent to AfD or at the very least a , however as was pointed out here the reliable sources that cover this slogan and can not be ignored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)

Comment: passes the  thanks to the above hundred thousand sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)