Deletion of Leonardo Ciampa

Comment: Subject of article fails to meet standards for inclusion laid out in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: nn musician. Complete lack of non-trivial coverage in |reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  Though I am impressed with the band of single purpose accounts he's managed to rouse up to make bad faith attacks on the nominator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Claims for notability are not supported by reliable external sources. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: More citations are always welcome, but at present, / is not nearly established.  (also, the partisanship of the Keepers is creeping me out.  try not to take this personally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: All the people complaining that he doesn't meet  are missing the point. He meets  thanks to the significant coverage by the Boston Globe and other media. It doesn't matter if his musical achievements consist of playing a kazoo in the second grade, if he meets the general notability requirements then he is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:N)

Comment: Meets Wikipedia:Notability with non trivial articles in the ''News Leader'' and the ''Globe''. Should also meet 's international tour standard, with the News Leader's statement: "Ciampa has made seven European tours encompassing Italy, Austria and Germany. He is particularly admired in Italy, where he has played in numerous international festivals.", but that's just extra
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Gruban's analysis. Arguably meets  although I'd like to see more evidence for that. Icewedge also makes a good catalog of sources. We should make our decision independently of Ciampa's behavior or the rude behavior of his apparent fans
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Despite his own self-promotion and the misbehavior of his meatpuppet army here, and despite the poor quality of most of the sources in the article, the 2002-10-03 Globe article is clearly nontrivial third-party coverage of the type required by , as is a review of one of his concerts in the Globe on 1996-09-06 ("Marciano shows star quality in US debut", unfortunately behind a paywall). So he (barely) seems to meet  #1, and if the international performances can be sourced he would also meet #4. However, if this is kept then some sort of sanction (perhaps involving a user conduct RFC) seems warranted to keep him away from his article so that it can be maintained more neutrally:  is not optional
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:MUSIC||WP:N)

Comment: With all due respect to Mr. Ciampa, whom I am sure is a excellent composer/pianist/organist, Wikipedia establishes notability requirements and the references in the article do not appear to clearly meet those requirements. The Newsleader source is marked as an advertisement and should be disregarded. The October 2007 Boston Globe reference is the definition of trivial, listing his upcoming performance as an activity alongside the Rising Star Quilters Guild's quilt show. It seems that the "His Suite Smells of Success" article is the only non-trivial coverage and that one piece doesn't seem to meet  or  as far as I can read for free. David Eppstein also includes the 1996 review, but I'm inclined to take that as trivial, since Mr Ciampa is not the subject of the article based on the title. Even if it were non-trivial, it would be arguable whether two articles qualify as multiple, IMO, and the overall over-promotion of the other sources would bias me toward arguing that it does not. Can someone who has spent the money to read these two articles comment on whether either one meets  #4 ("Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.") and describe the scope of the 1996 review
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: It's irrelevant,  and , along with all other topic-specific notability guidelines, are inclusive not exclusive. In other words, if a person meets the requirements at  then they are considered notable even though they may not meet . Those guidelines are intended to allow Wikipedia to include subjects that could be considered notable despite failing the requirements. But if a subject meets the general requirements then it doesn't matter if they meet any of the specific requirements. Leonardo Ciampa has been given "significant coverage" in "reliable sources" and thus meets  regardless of anything else. To give another example, Bill Clinton plays the saxophone but probably wouldn't pass the requirements at , is he then not notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:COMPOSER||WP:COMPOSER||WP:N||WP:N||WP:MUSICBIO)