Deletion of Aptuit

Comment:  is a faulty guideline (among the worst, in my opinion) that permits elimination of a potentially great source of neutral information about the many businesses that impact thousands of lives every day.  Coming anywhere near passing  should be a guaranteed keep, but failing it really isn't a decent reason to delete articles since impact of even average corporations is far greater than an average pop band on the charts, and that's why it's such a terrible guideline.  A partial rewrite of this article is in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I checked out MaxSem's google link, and all the stories seem to be repackaged press releases, specifically forbidden by . It's not important how many employees or Google hits they have; what matters is if there is enough |reliable non-trivial independent coverage. We can't build an encyclopaedia article out of press releases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS)

Comment: Doesn't appear to satisfy , which, like it or not, is where we should probably start. My own rule of thumb is that "existence is not notability". We're not a directory, so the fact that this company exists is not enough: for a corporation to be notable it must be doing something more than simply being in business - it has to be notable for actively doing something. If the firm were doing something new and important I'd say keep, but it's not: it's simply a company with some funding and a business plan, which is not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)