Deletion of Happiest Minds

Comment: The company is listed and I expected it to be kept. I also expected that it would receive special consideration, along with many other American company articles and American CEO's articles, that I notice are being kept at AFD, in the last few weeks, indicating some kind of , as there seems to be a trend, even though they are entirely common and non-notable. It is strange that while there are probably at least 4000 tier 1 and tier 2 IT companies in the US, this entirely unremarkable IT shop will be kept. The whole thing is a subversion of notability, as the list above is another collection of routine coverage that completely ignores , like it doesn't exist, and makes a mockery of notability and the five pillars. I'll see what Arbcom says about it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:NCORP)

Comment: An article with a history of  additions, links to IPO documents, etc. Searches do find coverage of their IPO (e.g. https://www.livemint.com/companies/people/this-77-year-old-entrepreneur-is-happiest-minds-as-he-hits-ipo-jackpot-a-second-time-11599825575093.html and https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/happiest-minds-is-100-digital-says-soota/articleshow/71434547.cms this interview-based article) and subsequent restructuring (https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/expert-view/what-revamp-at-happiest-minds-means-for-business/articleshow/81777333.cms), as well as some https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/happiest-minds-denies-allegations-of-wrongdoing-as-claimed-in-us-lawsuit-1568213969296.html prior coverage of a lawsuit. Certainly enough to |verify this as a company going about its business, but does it demonstrate |encyclopaedic notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (:WP:SPA||:WP:V||:WP:NCORP)

Comment: aside from  concerns, I'm not seeing  satisfied.  The bibliography consists entirely of press releases (not independent) and other coverage of their own operations (neither independent nor reliable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:42)

Comment: Happiest Minds passes Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations through receiving substantial coverage in analyst reports that provide critical analysis of the company's performance. Analyst reports are not "routine" coverage that cannot be used to establish notability because  specifically lists analyst reports as sources that can be used to establish notability. "Run-of-the-mill company in its run-of-the-mill sector" is not a policy-based rationale for deletion when the company has received significant coverage in reliable sources.The nominator wrote "I also expected that it would receive special consideration, along with many other American company articles and American CEO's articles, that I notice are being kept at AFD, in the last few weeks, indicating some kind of , as there seems to be a trend, even though they are entirely common and non-notable." Regarding the comment about , which redirects to Wikipedia:Systemic bias, Happiest Minds is not an American company. It is a company headquartered in Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:BIAS||WP:BIAS)