Deletion of Indoor tanning lotion

Comment: To address the nom (ie: ''For some reason, someone just removed the {{tl|prod}} without improving an article.''), the rationale for removing the PROD '''was''' given on the talk page, and it was clearly noted as such in the edit summary if he had only looked.  The article has been cited some and trimmed of weasel words since then.  Of course, those are never reasons to delete an article anyway () but the article has been improved, with plenty of room for more improvement
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: The article has '''no''' properly referenced content, which is a concern since  applies to the melanin production claims. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.202|202.124.73.202
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RSMED)