Deletion of Pseudomathematics (2nd nomination)

Comment: This appears to be our main article on mathematical crankery, frequent mistakes, and the like, a notable topic (the subject of whole books, e.g. Dudley's ''Mathematical Cranks'', Barbeau's ''Mathematical Fallacies, Flaws, and Flimflam'' and ''More Fallacies, Flaws & Flimflam'', or de Morgan's ''A Budget of Paradoxes''). Probably a better name can be found for it, but that is not a good reason for deletion. For the same reason the nominator's argument that "to have any credibility the material you cite ought to use the term" itself lacks credibility — per , our articles are about notable topics, not about English words, so it is the topic, not the word, that needs sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT)