Deletion of Richard Tarrant

Comment: It is to be noted this is not a vote, but a discussion of issues.  The fact that Tarrant is notable to those in Vermont does not make him notable to someone in California, which is a given.  If the only factor to notability is that someone, somewhere, ''might'' find it interesting, this gives inclusion a whole new meaning and requires a rewriting of  et al.  However the article ends up, I do not see my points refuted.  Shrug.  Life goes on
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom.  Many brushes with notability, like he hangs on the fringes of famous people.  He's not involved with scandal, but writes about it.  He's not an elected official, but wants to be.  More to the point, unless there's been an article about the election race itself, I'm seeing a violation of &E which states elections first, then the candidate.  And if this is an article about a candidate, then it needs to be pared down to focus on election issues, not his general bio, per &E.  &E is only a guideline right now, but I propose it's better than guessing and hemming and hawing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:C||WP:C)