Deletion of Gaston (Disney)

Comment: Amending to '''Keep''' but only if improved per , , and ssay and some sections are clearly . Reads like an infatuated fan wrote it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:E||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: I have worked with {{ping|Changedforbetter}} before, and I can attest that she is thorough and comprehensive and professional in every article she works on. This article had previously been fancrufty and full of listy trivia, but then CFB came along and added a wonderfully researched "Characteristics and themes" section, as well as working the Development and Reception sections too. The rest - like Appearances - still have remnants of the fancruft, but surely her work in adding third party reliable sourcing demonstrates the sheer coverage about this fictional character in the literature, and shows that his article is well earnt? I know ther Stuff Exists isn't an argument, but since they're quite similar, I'd like to point your attention to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)