Deletion of Generation Snowflake (3rd nomination)

Comment: The references included with the article include multiple reliable and independent secondary sources with significant coverage,and widespread use, satisfying general notability and . It was kept twice in recent months, and instances of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources continue to appear. Sorry if the term offends some editors. Wikipedia is not intended to be a safe space
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per nominator. Third nomination (last one in December), and not a single new argument. If this was a recreation of a deleted article it would be |speedy deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: per prior discussions, and a gentle  for the nominator… {{p
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: Allsportsfan's "words fail me" reaction is entirely understandable. The same people keep popping up every time the article is nominated. The fact is the article was irredeemably biased from the beginning, and any attempts to remove that bias have been resisted. Even attempts to move it to Snowflake (slang) or Snowflake (pejorative) have been resisted; this would at least give the article a chance to be an article about a slang term rather than a "kids these days" attack piece. It needs . The sources are mostly garbage too, just trashy op-eds and polemic pieces. In particular the pieces by Michelle Malkin and a nobody called Eleanor Halls who writes fluff pieces for GQ should not be cited as sources. Let's sort this crap out once and for all, it is entirely unacceptable that the article should be retained in its current blatantly POV, unencyclopedic state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: because this article was '''Kept''' at AfD in November 2016, and again in December 2016, it is far too soon for a do-over.  Also, it passes  with secondary  considering the origin and usage.  A good deal of sentiment both in hits that pop up in searches and in these 3 COUNT THEM 3 AfDs in less than 6 months amount to , and I get why given that it is a pejorative.  But do sources support notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT)