Deletion of Tati Westbrook (2nd nomination)

Comment: as many have stated above, the subject meets  at the very least, especially considering the recent slew of related media coverage. This discussion looks to be in  territory
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SNOW)

Comment: The nomination makes a case that a feud page should be gone, however it has already been deleted. It would be rediculous to also delete the biography of Tati Westbrook that deals with the totallity of her career, as covered in many sources. Coverage is so extensive that there is virtually no support for this nomination. I would like to encourage the nominator to withdraw and to be more selective in AfDs. If not, this may very well be  kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Passes . Passes : Subject had media coverage prior to the event. Given her career and YouTube following will continue to have it after
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: could having a top 1000 subscribed you tube channel (according to article) reflect some notability (a bit like a book being on a best seller list, see no 1 of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Fails . References are exclusively promotion or tabloid journalism . No lasting effect 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROMO||WP:SENSATIONAL||WP:LASTING)

Comment: I am concerned about  and some of the other concerns mentioned above, but I think that if more was done to flesh out this article beyond covering the basics and the recent controversy, it could be worthy of being here. I'm willing to keep the article around to see if it reaches that state, but if it continues to be in this stub status for a prolonged period, we can look into merging or doing something then
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: since passing the . We are already merging or deleting the feud article. This one is a biography with lasting value. The page was deleted in the past before YouTube rating and the media coverage of Tati Westbrook went way up. We shouldn't cling to the old situation but take an unbiased look at current reality
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Well, above I suggested two new sources that long predate the event and to me seem to meet the GNG criteriahttps://gazettereview.com/2018/02/tati-westbrook-net-worth/https://www.bustle.com/p/who-is-tati-westbrook-meet-the-youtube-vlogger-who-just-launched-halo-beauty-8366914  – other people here seem to agree. Those suggesting ''delete'' seem to be ignoring these or denying that any such references exist. If policy-based argument is required then  seems to be the relevant policy and none of the three conditions for deletion seem to apply whereas all must apply for deletion to be warranted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Passes , the recent controversy probably pushed it over the GNG edge, but it meets notability requirements at this point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)