Deletion of 270towin.com

Comment: per  ''"Wikipedia bases its decision about whether web content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the web content has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the web content, its authors, or its owners."'' There are hundreds of sources that Wikipedia considers reliable that cite this website as an authority (eg: https://projects.economist.com/us-2020-forecast/president, https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/can-republicans-vote-super-tuesday, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/11/03/2020-election-when-democratic-field-narrow/4124073002/, https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-the-craziest-end-to-the-2016-campaign-runs-through-new-mexico/, https://infoguides.gmu.edu/USelections/GIS,https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1179&context=artsci_stu, http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/recent-polling-in-the-swing-states-favors-biden/, https://libguides.library.umaine.edu/elections/congress
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB)

Comment: per , , , and . The only supporters of deletion are the nom, which is an IP's   because its arguments have been contradicted by {{U|TimothyBlue}}, and a bare !vote. FWIW, https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22270towin.com%22+-wikipedia there are over 2,000 articles on Google news and it has been https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22270towin.com%22 cited over 200 times in scholarly works
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:NWEB||WP:BEFORE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)