Deletion of Freakyclown (2nd nomination)

Comment: Pure weapons-grade ''|vanispamcruftisement'' by a  that lacks sufficient  to meet  … none of the "references" (like a link to purchase a book on Amazon.com) can be considered . Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{User|71.166.140.155
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA||WP:SPA||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: This is slightly fuller than the version previously deleted at AfD, maybe just enough to escape {{tl|db-repost}}, but it does not demonstrate |notability. He is claimed to be co-author of two books: in the first case he is not credited, at least under this name, and in the second his name appears among a long list of others. Even if those claims are accepted, they, together with presenting at various conferences and "being the inspiration" for a book character, do not add up to notability, which would require evidence of |significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:42)