Deletion of Emmanuelle Waeckerle

Comment: I cannot find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. This fails |GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I added an additional citation, a non-digitized article from Evening Standard which I requested from their archivist. The article is about an evening performance with multiple performers of which the subject is one. While I don't think this citation qualifies as "substantial" as it mentions several performers, I do believe it adds to the collection of  #3 as one of "multiple independent sources." I continue to pursue the BBC, FR3, and other citations (it's slow because it involves large orgs and I'm an ocean away, thank you for your patience
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: per  of the reviews of the subject's work identified by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: I'm not sure why editors above keep referring only to . It's quite likely that the subject might meet a . Finding reviews of her work might show that she meets  #3, "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work ... or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Reviews don't have to be in print (paper or digital) -  says that "audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources." I hope this AfD will be kept open long enough for
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SNG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:PUBLISHED)

Comment: I was about to write something similar as RebeccaGreen above, I too was wondering why nobody was referring to the actually relevant notability guideline for people  and  #3 in addition to . If either of them is fulfilled the subject is notable. Given that the sources so far seem to be reliable but on a middle-ground regarding establishing notability, I think this is an important quote from : "''If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)