Deletion of W. C. Berwick Sayers

Comment: I just added ten reviews of five books to the article. So in addition to the pass of  from the published obituary and memorial volume (which was inexplicably omitted from the nomination statement) he also passes  and likely (through presidency of the Library Association) #C6
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: In addition to the obit the nom mentions, the 'Further Reading' section already listed https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/klsZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiG8qDYuoXtAhWIEVkFHbJkBukQ7_IDMBB6BAgOEAI a memorial volume in honor of Sayers. While this volume is an offline source, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.850.6334&rep=rep1&type=pdf p. 246 pf the obit in questions says this about its content: "The first three chapters, by J.D. Stewart, Eileen Colwell and S.P.L. Filon, are about Sayers". Pp 246-247 of the obit list several other items in the "Biographical and critical" writings about Sayers section. I found an online publicly available version of one of these items, a 1961 article in 'Annals of Library Science' by Ranganathan, S.R. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/28463/1/ALIS%208%283%29%2085-99.pdf ''Sayers and Donker Duyvis'', which I have also added tp the Further Reading section. Overall, certainly enough here already to satisfy  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: OK, I'm convinced that he passes . The Festschrift counts toward #C1 and the Library Association presidency counts toward #C6. I think that's more than enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: ec}} the "Further reading" section cites {{tq|D.J. Foskett and B.I. Palmer , eds., ''The Sayers Memorial Volume'', London: Library Association, 1961.}}; and  (which supersedes GNG) notes {{tq|The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1, except in the case of publication in vanity, fringe, or non-selective journals or presses.}}. Heading the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals arguably satisfies NACADEMIC C6 as well. It is also fairly easy to find reviews and analysis of his work https://www.jstor.org/stable/1214582?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22berwick+sayers%22+review&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522berwick%2Bsayers%2522%2Breview%26filter%3D&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_SYC-5187_SYC-5188%2F5187&refreqid=fastly-default%3A2a78986a6bb0cfe008b68db1c131ea16&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contentshttps://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/613782https://www.jstor.org/stable/26209831?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22An+Introduction+to+Library+Classification%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3D%2522An%2BIntroduction%2Bto%2BLibrary%2BClassification%2522&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_SYC-5187_SYC-5188%2F5187&refreqid=fastly-default%3A0f3dc534b5bb4f81a09a4ecbd5c5b308&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contentshttps://go-gale-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T002&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&hitCount=17&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA105967438&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=ZGPP-MOD1&prodId=ITOF&pageNum=1&contentSet=GALE%7CA105967438&searchId=R2&userGroupName=wikipedia&inPS=true, making a case for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: There may be a case that he passes #C6
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)