Deletion of 10x Management

Comment: https://www.desirabilitylab.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/TheNomadsAreComing_FINAL.pdf This article (PDF) was originally published https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2015/12/22/globetrotting-digital-nomads-the-future-of-work-or-too-good-to-be-true/#5e2ab4657594https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2015/12/22/globetrotting-digital-nomads-the-future-of-work-or-too-good-to-be-true/#5e2ab4657594 on Forbes sites and https://web.archive.org/web/20190311044039/http://blog.sailsoftware.co/2013/09/12/how-i-thought-i-wanted-to-become-a-digital-nomad.html as a blog posting, fails . https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jon_Younger/publication/310292369_How_Learning_and_Development_Are_Becoming_More_Agile/links/582b104308aef19cb8069915.pdf This from Harvard Business Review is a single mention-in-passing ''"As importantly,more and more top agile talents, for example those represented by 10X Management, are only interested in working in environments where the work is interesting, and they are welcomed as a team member."'', fails . https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-04-10/silicon-valley-goes-hollywood-top-coders-can-now-get-agents This from Bloomberg is entirely based on an interview with a co-founder, fails . https://e.lanbook.com/reader/journalArticle/349368/#4 The reference from lanbook.com (in Russian) briefly mentions the company on page 3 to note that 10x is based in Silicon Valley and former programmers work there (Так, в Кремниевой долине появилась компания по поиску талантов - 10X Management . В ней работают бывшие программисты и продюсеры.), fails .  https://it.sohu.com/20130418/n373151936.shtml This from sohu.com is also entirely based on an interview with a co-founder, fails . None of those references meet the criteria for establishing notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Getting a "fair amount" of press (even in reputable publications) is not enough for a reference to establish notability. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. Usually, analyst reports which profile a company are considered good references but the Forrester report that mentions this company is a mention without a company profile. https://web.archive.org/web/20180918194041/http://gelookahead.economist.com/it-software-talent/ The Economist article relies on information provided by a co-founder and fails ORGIND. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-19/why-an-ex-google-coder-makes-twice-as-much-freelancing The Bloomberg reference doesn't have any in-depth information on the company and fails  and is more about the experiences of software engineers than the company itself. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/24/programmers-price The New Yorker magazine piece is really churnalism where the journalist is a fly-on-the-wall of a client's experience in deciding to hire 10x and also fails  as it relies on information provided by the company or their client. https://web.archive.org/web/20190119021720/https://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/08/representing-programmers-as-if-they-were-celebrities/ The NYT article is a blog post and fails . Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS||WP:NCORP)