Deletion of List of police violence incidents during George Floyd protests

Comment: per . Many of the references affirm that these incidents have been discussed "as a set or group". A stand-alone list is probably the best way to present the information. In Minneapolis, our City Council passed a resolution opposing the use of "less lethal" crowd control methods as a direct result of the many incidents where protesters and journalists were injured
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: the relevant criterion of  has been met (not going to repeat it here): ''the topic of which individual instances are under discussion have been discussed collectively as part of a broader issue''. They do not need to be individually referenced. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: the relevant test is . The other issues mentioned have to the with the inclusion criteria, which can be changed on the article's talk page (for example, tightening sourcing requirements for inclusion). There is no requirement that individual incidents be individually notable, as LISTN says. To pass LISTN, we need to see coverage as a group. Here's what I'm seeing: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/29/us-police-brutality-protest The Guardian, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52932611 BBC, https://www.vox.com/2020/6/12/21279619/protesters-police-violence-philadelphia-los-angeles-washington-dc Vox, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/05/us/police-violence-george-floyd.html NY Times, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/06/police-violence-protests-us-george-floyd The Guardian, https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/equality/504185-this-map-tracks-incidents-of-police-violence-during-the The Hill, https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/05/george-floyd-protests-police-violence.html Slate, https://www.insider.com/george-floyd-protests-police-violence-reform-change-2020-6 Insider, https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kpbmy/police-violence-at-protests-is-undeniable-all-the-videos-are-right-here Vice, https://www.newsweek.com/increased-attacks-journalists-covering-protests-coincide-videos-police-attacking-unarmed-1509136 Newsweek, https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/08/04/899084543/amnesty-international-documents-125-incidents-of-police-violence-against-protest NPR, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jun/05/im-getting-shot-attacks-on-journalists-surge-in-us-protests The Guardian, https://www.vox.com/2020/6/6/21282412/protests-viral-videos-police-violence-disciplinary-action-suspension-firing Vox, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-floyd-protests-police-brutality-settlements-lawsuits/ CBS News.... &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per  and edit based upon comments by {{u|Willbb234}}. I will work on the edits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per Batmanthe8th and Rhododendrites.   is the test and it's easily met.   Nor are the events INDISCRIMINATEly drawn from news reports, they were first cultivated by Doucette & Miller, whose cataloging of the events was widely cited.  Other concerns are talk page material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per links from Rhododendrites, this clearly meets the criteria for  as the group or set has been covered by multiple independent RSs. I recommend that everybody actually read through the  criteria before voting, as most of the delete votes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTN)

Comment: Coincidentally, I was considering this for deletion just yesterday. The main concern I have here is that this is an indiscriminate list. Additionally, many of the incidents are subject to  and are based on sources which cite video clips or vague reports, and thus the whole context and situation were not scrutinised, meaning making claims like this aren't appropriate. This information is also covered under George Floyd protests#Violence and controversies and quite extensively at that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)