Deletion of James Marwood (2nd nomination)

Comment: the player can sign for a top flight club all he wants, but he still fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: still fails  and . Yes he might make his debut in a |fully-professional league soon - but he also might not.  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:FPL||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Fails notability today. He may pass it soon, but even in that case this article should be deleted as it is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Meets  with sources http://www.thenonleaguefootballpaper.com/features/star-corner/8413/james-marwood-gateshead-winger/ http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/james-marwood-praises-newcastle-uniteds-6854117 http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/sport/spfl/silver-tongued-craig-lured-new-boy-james-north-169847n.24665697. Also, even if he didn't meet  is there any point wasting everyone's time deleting an article that only get restored in a few weeks. Jmorrison230582 notes that keeping the article violated , however this is not true.  doesn't allow for future events unless ''they are almost certain to occur'' (thus allowing articles such as 2026 FIFA World Cup to exist). Can anyone honestly say they don't think it's almost certain that James Marwood wouldn't be making an appearance for St. Mirren soon?   There's no rush to delete this article before then. There are no firm rules that say this article needs to be deleted before we see happens, and there is . This article remaining in place for a few weeks does no harm, so let's show a bit of ; if something bizarre happens over the summer, the article can simply go to AFD at that time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NORUSH||WP:COMMONSENSE)