Deletion of Martha L. MacDonald

Comment: WP:ACADEMIC is one notability guideline and doesn't overrule others, nor the GNG. Even so, as past president of the International Association for Feminist Economics, the top level academic society in the field of feminist economics, MacDonald could be argued to pass academic #6.  Although #8 specifies editor or chief editor only, the fact that MacDonald is a long-standing http://www.smu.ca/webfiles/res-cv-martha-macdonald.pdf associate editor of Feminist Economics (which, mind you, is distinctly different than just being on the editorial board) combined with her other body of work makes a pretty good case that she passes academic criterion #1 as well.  I'd dig up sources to demonstrate that but don't feel the need to given that there's no question that MacDonald passes  #3 - here's five reviews in reputable publications of her books that easily exceed the requirement of "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."  Plenty more exist, I just both don't want to dig around to make a full list, don't want to spam the page with it, and figure this should be plenty to show she passes creative #3 - http://jir.sagepub.com/content/52/5/645.full.pdf+html, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch/102/, http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=6238844&fileId=S0008423900003115, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2010.00842_6.x/abstract, http://elr.sagepub.com/content/20/1/133.full.pdf+html.  If I dug around more I'd imagine she'd meet other notability guidelines too, and certainly the GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)