Deletion of Noogenesis

Comment: this looks more like  and https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=134402284 reverted to this version since the subject itself is probably noteable even though somewhat esoteric, but this article seems to be heavily influenced by one author and should be rewritten by someone knowledgeable. There are 926 mentions in google scholar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: this borders on  but nevertheless has enough reliable sources, citations, and publications. Not overtly promotional and still informative
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The term "noogenesis" is valid, however the current article has been filled with so much junk, it largely misses the point by yapping about nonsense like "the global intellectual system" and "Super Intellect realizing itself as Global Intelligence on Earth". Where neuronal "intelligence" came from and how it evolved is a fascinating question concerning evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and behaviorism - The evolution of intelligence is an especially important part of human evolution, as the intellectual faculties of humans (such as language, tool usage, etc) are its most distinguishing features. The current article is far too convoluted with irrelevant and insane gibberish to discuss this properly. If irrelevant junk cannot be stripped from the article, I suggest we , and have it rewritten with actual biological basis, rather than the fantastical, overwritten nonsense the current article is filled with. Special:Contributions/31.50.223.227|31.50.223.227
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:NUKEIT)

Comment: The old ideas of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin might be notable, but what we have here is  and a lot of pseudoscience. Nothing worth salvaging. Furthermore, who would even do the rewriting, since apparently the only people editing the article were the puppetmaster and their socks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per the nomination. |Synthesis of new woolly ideas with old woolly ideas
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)