Deletion of Antonio McKee (2nd nomination)

Comment: He still fails  and I don't think winning the California Community College wrestling championship  is enough to show notability.  I did post on JadeSnake's talk page that is was bad form to repost an AfD that soon and I think/hope he now understands that.  Since  I favor letting this AFD run its course.   I expect the outcome to be the same as before, but I see no harm in continuing a discussion that's already started
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:NOTBUREAU)

Comment: Doesn't meet , but you can make a case for .  The Sports Illustrated artice is the best example.  There seems to be significant coverage in other sources, but I'm not sure they're reliable.  Most of the sources are routine, but he seems to have gained notoriety (and hence coverage) for being controversial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , Fails , Fails , Fails , (and a host of other possible qualifiers), most of this is routine sports reporting, and doesn't qualify as sourcing. yes, there is a lot of it, but non of it qualifies. '''Please read ''' be well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE||WP:NMMA||WP:BLP||WP:LOTSOFSOURCES)

Comment: I agree, Fails , Fails , Fails , Fails , Ref's are poor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE||WP:NMMA||WP:BLP)

Comment: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/josh_gross/09/10/mckee/index.html What about this Sports Illustrated interview? Nor routine, nor a mere announceement/result. I also ask about the USA Today/MMajunkie article which announces http://www.mmajunkie.com/news/2010/09/antonio-mckee-signs-four-fight-ufc-deal his UFC signing? Which strikes me as more than routine, but rather a big deal. It clearly says in there that he does not have a fight or a timeline in place for one. It is also not a trivial mention of him either. The article is not a press release. In fact, it is critical of Mckee. What about http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/blog/cagewriter/post/McKee-s-Loser-Leaves-Town-match-forced-by-raci?urn=mma,259066 This yahoo Sports article? It is definitely non routine, and can be used as a source according to . That alone is enough to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:N)

Comment: On the merits of the article alone, I'd say to keep as passing . While I'm not convinced that the quick renomination meets the criteria of peedy keep, I'm also not sure it's the best good-faith tactic for dealing with this, so I oppose the deletion request on procedural grounds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:S)

Comment: Why ignore all of the new  that have been added recently? He is clearly notable at this point. Wheres an admin when you need one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES)

Comment: With his new refs he passes  with reliable . Plus he has several notable fights
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SOURCES)

Comment: Seems to have enough sourcing to pass , which is the gold standard of notability, not MMA
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NMMA)

Comment: I agree that passing  would be sufficient, but most of what I see for sources are routine sports reporting--upcoming fight announcements and results
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)