Deletion of Cassie Jaye

Comment: Not notable. One film and it's a direct-sale  movement film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Everyone who is talking about WP:ACTOR, WP:DIRECTOR, etc are missing the point here. The criteria for biographical articles comes down to the same criteria as all other articles, from : {{tq|People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject}}. As part of the AfD discussion template, there are links to sources like Google News and Google Scholar and Google Books. Taking a look at this results https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Cassie+Jaye%22&tbm=nws News - 1550, https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Cassie+Jaye%22 Books: 600+ (although I'm sure many of these are false positives you can see pretty clearly from the previews that she's discussed in multiple books, https://cse.google.com/cse?hl=en&cx=007734830908295939403:galkqgoksq0&cof=FORID:13%3BAH:left%3BCX:Wikipedia%2520Reference%2520Search&q=%22Cassie+Jaye%22#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22Cassie%20Jaye%22&gsc.page=1 Custom Search 15,000+... It's true that this article isn't currently making adequate use of the  that covers her, and that's problem. But in terms of the  there's no question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:RS||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Agricola44 makes a compelling argument. As per  she clearly meets point 3, she created the Red Pill and it is a significant work which is world wide being watched by people from Australia, Europe and North America to name just some of the places where people have attack it and tried to censure its content. It's been reported by news shows, newspapers and such like so clearly meets the additional requirement that such work must have been the primary subject of "...multiple independent periodical articles". Point 3 also ends with "...or reviews" so being the primary subject in reviews is enough to meet this point as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Definately 100% does not meet  WP:ACTOR, not notable stubs like this have no place here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)