Deletion of Pavel Maksakovsky

Comment: it has received significant coverage in recent serious Marxist journals: Richard B Day in Historical Materialism 10:3http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yx302AX_lxUC&lpg=PA459&ots=ApswqukF2u&dq=Pavel%20Maksakovsky&pg=PA459#v=onepage&q=Pavel%20Maksakovsky&f=false, Hadas Thier in International Socialist Review (1997)|International Socialist Reviewhttp://isreview.org/person/pavel-maksakovsky, Stavros D. Mavroudeas in Science and Society http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/41510533?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21102631926823; Google Books indicates a significant number of citations.  I've not checked for Russian sources. Regarding claims that he's not notable because he only wrote one book, that is contradicted by  and : both only require a single contribution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: per  and . If it's only his book that has any significance, we should have an article about the book, not him. And we can't have an article about either without |reliable secondary sources to provide us the material for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG||WP:RS)