Deletion of David Williams III

Comment: People do not get articles just for running as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at  is ''holding'' a notable political office, not just running for one. So to earn inclusion here, he would have to pass one of two tests: either (a) he can demonstrate and |reliably source that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten him an article anyway, or (b) he can demonstrate and reliably source that his candidacies were significantly ''more special'' than most other people's candidacies in some way that would pass the |ten year test for enduring significance. But neither of those tests are being met here: the article is based almost entirely on |primary sources (raw tables of election results, his own self-published website, the self-published websites of other organizations that he's directly affiliated with, social networking content, YouTube videos, etc.) that are not support for notability at all, and the very few sources that actually come from any real media outlets don't represent enough coverage to make him more special than most other candidates
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:10YT||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: I'm not seeing any RS for his Navy service and his claimed rank and service does not satisfy 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: per Bearcat. Not enough reliable coverage outside of routine campaign coverage to establish . All sock/meat votes need to be crossed out. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)