Deletion of Edward H. Royle

Comment: I'd CSD this, but there's an assertion of notability, hence why we're here. He fails |basic, as there isn't the slightest hint of him being notable outside of mentions of basic court cases. While he may appear in newspapers, most lawyers do at some point or another. I don't see any significant coverage or anything that should put him above or beyond the other thousands of lawyers in Canada. It's entirely possible this could be a promo with the new note saying he'd do things "pro bono" in "certain circumstances
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Wp:GNG|Non-notable individual. There are directory listings and some local coverage but no |significant coverage in |independent |reliable sources. Appearing as counsel in a notable case does not make him notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:THIRDPARTY||WP:RS)