Deletion of Sepandar Kamvar

Comment: The individual is certainly notable as far as I can see, no problem getting past . Unless the nominator can provide a more thorough rationale. Not all of those sources are self-published. E.g., http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2012/11/start/code-for-the-rest-of-ushttp://readwrite.com/2007/08/09/interview_with_sep_kamvar_google_personalizationhttp://www.persianmirror.com/Article_det.cfm?id=1542&getArticleCategory=41&getArticleSubCategory=1 If anything the article has an undue number of references to self-published or irrelevant material, but that's a matter of cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It's a high-citation field, but nonetheless his citation record is strong enough to persuade me of #C1. On the other hand, his named chair is a junior-level one, not enough for #C5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)