Deletion of Delta Airlines Flight 1086

Comment: Article appears to have gone through a large restructure since it's nomination. Here's https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delta_Airlines_Flight_1086&diff=650986363&oldid=650750576 what has changed. More importantly, 16 good references about the flight let it fly (geddit it's a plane... I'm sorry) by . I suggest anyone who has voted to maybe take another look at it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: because Wikipedia is |not a newspaper. I think  (being an essay, rather than a guideline or policy) is pretty silly at the best of times, and this doesn't even rise to the level of meeting those criteria. Airports are closed for storms and fuel spills all the time, so the suggestion that the airport closure makes this a subject worth covering is silly. If someone wants to mention this elsewhere, they can, but it doesn't warrant a stand-alone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:AIRCRASH)

Comment: per nominator and . No need to wait
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as per , but no prejudice against a redirect to LaGuardia Airport#Accidents and incidents
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is plainly news. Know why? I SAW IT ON THE NEWS. In a country different than the one this occurred in. It was covered internationally. So smug assertions that  applies are simply wrong.Special:Contributions/96.51.16.28|96.51.16.28
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: As per . No one will even remember this in a year
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)