Deletion of Bo Johnson

Comment: nothing wrong with having an article titled ''Bo Johnson'', but not this one as it stands.  Quite likely it should be a redirect or disambiguation page at the end of the day.  Possibly send the current article to draft for more work.  The article is a stylistic mess, full of promotional inline external links and largely referenced with social media (which may be how musicians work these days, but unfortunately doesn't cut it for WP).  Removing the cruft wouldn't leave much.  It could probably be tidied up, but my suggestion would be to try that in draft and go through the |articles for creation process which would give helpful feedback.  I don't see that the article demonstrates |notability, and I didn't find much myself, but Swedish musician biographies is hardly my area of expertise.  It also falls foul of the |biographies of living persons guidelines for tone, balance, and sources
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC||WP:GNG||WP:BLP)

Comment: I find that an article for Bo Johnson is needed and highly sought after. I have no connections to this artist at all, nor am I a fan. I have however seen and heard a lot with him in different public media for several years and he has demonstrably fans worldwide (incl. my own children and my cousins in the UK even), hence an article feels missing and required. It is correct that I have written a first, smaller article in Swedish as well, since I have learnt both the English and the Swedish language since birth and because the artist origins from Sweden which should be relevant. The Swedish article will be updated as well. I appologize should any technical mistake have been made, the purpose was solely to write this subjective and encyclopedic article following  which was clearly missing. The sources are not at all mostly from social media, although some from it yes, but from more reliable sources eg. Billboard, Medium, IMDb, A&R Factory, All Music Ear, Spotify, Apple Music, Allmusic, BODY Magazine, BODY Radio, WHOMAG TV, Spinnin' Records, DJ Times and more. I am of course open for any improvements. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: ping|MinerwaY}} Thanks for cleaning up the references in the article. Looking through them though I do not see any which I think cause him to pass |the general notability guidelines or |for bands and musicians. What is needed are three or so |independent |reliable sources which have significant coverage ''about him''. I usually consider significant to mean at least two or three paragraphs, others may look for more or less but two/three is a good rule-of-thumb.  Press releases (also articles which reasonably appear to be 'repackaged' marketing material), blogs, social media, sites with user generated content or pay-to-place articles, as well as articles with just a couple of lines -- known as 'passing mentions' -- do not contribute to |notability for Wikipedia purposes. Some such material ''might'' be usable in an article once notability is established but they still need to be in line with Wikipedia's |sourcing requirements as well as the |policy on biographies of living people.  Please click through the {{blue|blue}} links. Wikipedia uses some words like 'notability' and 'source' in ways which are specific to the site and the linked pages describe important policies and guidelines.  I have the article on my watchlist but feel free to ping me, either here or from the article's talk page, if you have any questions or would like my opinion on a particular source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:BLP)