Deletion of Wasilla librarian letter of termination

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per . It fails the "''significant lasting and historical interest and impact''" test of  as well - after the election it will be forgotten except by extreme partisans. Incident could maybe have a mention in Sarah Palin if consensus can be achieved that it's important enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as  used as a . If anything about this incident is to be mentioned, it should be in Sarah Palin's article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Read 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: pick a reason , fails  and , non-encyclopedic, extremely unlikely search term, OTINHERITED, OTNEWS, POV fork, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: obvious |coatrack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: as a |soapy |coatrack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: as not notable and as .  I have requested a much more minimal version of this info be added to the Sarah Palin article - see Talk:Sarah_Palin#Proposed_change_to_Wasilla_section
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Agreed... this is an excelent example of a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)