Deletion of Mathematical practice

Comment: The existing article is certainly not good, but it can be improved with the work of a few minutes. I have found one reference. I dislike nominations here that make no attempt to follow the guideline at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The nomination makes no clear proposal; it just |lists some issues and wants the article discussing in a general way.  But we already have an appropriate discussion in progress, as the nomination notes, and so this is |forum shopping.  As for the topic, it might be difficult as it is rather |broad in nature, as it will tend to have at least three strands
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:FORUMSHOPPING||WP:BROAD)