Deletion of Nathan King

Comment: this AfD should deserve a '''procedural keep''' as the nom is an identified and blocked sockpuppet and he tried (successfully) to address the current discussion voting with one another of his sock accounts. However, the subject passes  as has some not-local-news coverage (as New Zealand Herald), and also not considering the sources, he easily passes , criteria 2 (as he ''has had a single or album on any country's national music chart''), criteria 8 and criteria 11. He also passes  criteria 1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: A topic that merits coverage, due to .  Also, procedural keep due to sockpuppetry and deceit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)