Deletion of Mark E. Hyman

Comment: as subject of reliable significant coverage. BTW, {{Querylink|Mark E. Hyman|qs=&diff=next&oldid=624633353|this tag-bombing}} seems a tad |pointy; advertisement, primary sources, singles ource, neutral sources – these are not obvious to me and should be more specifically directed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: it appears that |steps requested prior to sending an article to  has not been met here. A quick search for |reliable sources regarding the subject of this article (once one drops the middle initial) finds a plethora of |significant coverage in multiple reliable sources (https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Mark+E.+Hyman%22&gws_rd=ssl#q=%22Mark+Hyman%22+Sinclair&tbm=nws news, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mark+Hyman%22+Sinclair&biw=1079&bih=691&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=GqkbVMjcAsvkoATGrICwAg&ved=0CAwQ_AUoAQ books). Therefore the subject clearly meets . Now does this article need to be worked on, sure; however, I don't see a reason that this article can't be worked on and salvaged instead of the possible  solution
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AFD||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:TNT)

Comment: Hyman is the subject of significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources. Thus he meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)