Deletion of Angela Fimmano

Comment: The sources provided confirm notability. Yes, the sources are somewhat weak but it's enough to suffice  and since  says "presumed notable" it should be kept. Even then  is a thing and and should be used more frequently when improving the encyclopedia. If anyone here thinks that adding articles on women footballers isn't improving Wikipedia then you have more issues than simply adhering to policy. That is not pointing fingers because I don't know anyone here personally and you don't know me. That's just an observation based on the eyeball test
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:IAR)

Comment: According to its article, the W-league is the top league available to women in Australia. Either we need to keep its players per , or we need to scrap NSPORT as imposing a sexist double standard and ''consistently'' apply full-GNG-based standards to all athletes (not just the women
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Based on the sources provided, I don't think this meets . The sources provided do not constitute |significant coverage, as they are just Q&As with the player themselves, without going too in-depth. I did a search to find other sources and did not find any that constituted in-depth coverage. Whether or not the player played at a professional level, |"fully-professional" or otherwise, they still need to pass GNG, and that has not been demonstrated here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:FPL)