Deletion of Synthetic rope

Comment: I suppose, as contributing to a general improvement of the rope article but I don't feel strongly against merely a ''redirect'' (or even ''keep''). There is nothing wrong with the article and the topic passes  although editorially the contents could sensibly be handled as part of the broader topic. Even the nomination seems to be hinting at ''redirect'' although the earlier PROD had a contrary implication. Sometimes a redirect is accompanied by deleting the previous article content. This would not be appropriate here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: into "Rope". The guideline  states "There are other times when it is better to cover notable topics, that clearly should be included in Wikipedia, as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context." The article, such as it is, has two sentences that could be copy-pasted into the "Rope" article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)