Deletion of PESWiki

Comment: fails , not notable enough, not enough links in, article reads like an ad and needs serious wikification
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: site does not meet  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails . Sorry. The most significant inboudn link seems to be a Digg ... and a Wikipedia article. http://www.alexa.com/data/ds/linksin?q=link:peswiki.com/&url=peswiki.com
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: SUCCEEDS , notable enough, enough links to validate technologies outlined, article reads like normal news ezines and needs to be maintained.  IT IS ALSO WORTH NOTING THAT A LOT OF THE POSTS REQUESTING DELETION ARE FROM THE SAME OR SIMILAR IP ADDRESSES...NICE TRY
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No, Nuke it. It fails ,  (were are the independent third party sources?),  (reads like an advert), (take your pick of violations there...soapbox, hosting, etc),  (Per the rant above), /(Per the rant above) ...and the holy trinity:   (article is far from a neutral pov),  (No independent sources?), and  (Can't verify any of this information). I haven't seen this many violations on just one article in a long time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS||WP:SPAM||WP:NOT||WP:POINT||WP:AUTO||WP:VANITY||WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: Fails  and others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)