Deletion of Headlinersuk

Comment: The links are like public service announcements, not hard news. Sounds like you have a |conflict of interest too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I tried to write a factual entry in line with what I assume Wikipedia requires; without promoting the organisation I work for unfairly.  To me, and according to the reference you |cite  a conflict of interest occurs when I am doing something other than trying to further the aims of Wikipedia.  I've got no problem with disclosing that I work for Headliners, and if Wikipedia wants me to declare that information then that's fine.  But then I've edited a lot of wikipedia entries on subjects that I have knowledge or an interest in; primarily because I either work or volunteer or have involvement with them.  Does that mean there is |conflict of interest each time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:COI)

Comment: The fact that an article for Children's Express is neither here nor there (), in any case, the Chilren's Express article refers to the now-defunct US organisation. While it is a worthy organisation and has had some coverage I do not believe it is significant coverage as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:N)

Comment: but merging would be OK.  |Well-sourced: BBC, ''The Guardian'', etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)