Deletion of Energy Tower (Midland, Texas)

Comment: either move the article to a "controversy" as suggested above, or delete it per  - since it does not exist beyond the design/permitting phase, I'm not sure such an article should remain.  I have no problem with an article about the controversy, which is essentially what |the extensive coverage shows. When and if it is built, the article can be moved back, overriding the redirect
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: and at its current title) per Binks' references found. There is no requirement that something actually has to exist in order to have an article on it, itself - note the article on a certain cryptid is at Bigfoot, not Bigfoot myth. This subject clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)