Deletion of Theosophy and science

Comment: to one of the main Theosophy articles - although I would hate to have to sort that out. Reading through that article, I found myself bouncing between "this seems a nice summary of existing analysis" and "this is pulling together a boatload of primary sources to make a point" - back and forth, several times. This is really meandering along the line between acceptable summary and unacceptable synthesis, and I think it spends too much time on the wrong side of the tracks. Much of it should go in the light of our |synthesis guidelines, and I don't believe the remainder would stand up too well as a separate article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per , and : {{tq|a Wikipedia article should not make a fringe theory appear more notable or more widely accepted than it is.}} I believe this article and others like it exist to promote Theosophy. What the IP says in their delete vote above should be taken seriously. Some more info can be found in Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Two_promotional_Theosophy_articles_up_for_deletion|this FTN section, as they linked to above. Rosguill's comment also makes some excellent points, ones which, to me, point towards deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:FRINGE)