Deletion of Gordy Bunch

Comment: passes  and The Woodlands, Texas should be looked at as something close to a city... It defies explanation for an international audience to be honest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails . The Woodlands, Texas is currently an unincorporated special purpose district in Texas and the chair of the township is elected by the other members of the board. While the Fox News article provides some nationalized coverage of the subject, the level of nationalized coverage is not what we typically desire for a local board member
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Per Bearcat. Fails  and  due to a lack of sustained . Just a local politician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: passes , The Woodlands, Texas has a population exceeding 100,000 residents, this is regional prominence. Also passes  and  he has received coverage from national news sources such as Fox News, he has also been a candidate for Texas State Senate, and is founder and CEO of a The Woodlands Financial Group (TWFG) and President of Professional Insurance Agents of Texas. TWFG Insurance is ranked #1 in Texas and Louisiana and 8th largest privately-owned independent insurance provider in the United States
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability for local political figures is not a question of the municipality's population — it depends on the quality of the ''sourcing'', and a population of 100K is ''not'' an instant notability freebie for a mayor or municipal councillor or board chair in the ''absence'' of adequate sourcing. People also do ''not'' get Wikipedia articles for running as ''candidates'' for higher NPOL-passing offices — for "Texas State Senate" to have any bearing whatsoever on his notability, he would have to have ''won'' that election and thereby sat ''in'' the State Senate as a ''Senator'', not just run and lose. But the references here are not building a strong case for his notability: they are nearly all |primary sources and small community hyperlocals in which coverage of the local political scene is merely ''expected'' to exist, and the only one that's a genuinely national source just briefly mentions his existence in the context of being fundamentally ''about'' something ''other'' than ''him''. This is not how you make people at this level of political office notable enough for Wikipedia articles: the notability test is ''not'' "as soon as his name has been mentioned in a national media source once" — he has to be the ''subject'' of substantive coverage, not just get namechecked in coverage of other things, before a source assists in building his notability at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)