Deletion of Chimp Chapman

Comment: It may not be a G1, but it's definitely an A7 (non-notable bio) and almost certainly a G3 (obvious hoaxes qualify as silly vandalism).  Either way, do it now.  Obvious hoax. Editor has been warned with {{tl|uw-hoax}}. And even if the speedy is declined, I think I see it |snowing outside
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Unsourced nonsense. A Duck test|duck test leads me to believe the author and anonymous user are the same person. The author's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lnbcapital contributions consist only of 4 edits to this article. The anon's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lnbcapital contributions consist almost entirely of adding nonsense about Chimp Chapman to other articles over the past few days. I would argue that it would almost qualify for {{db-bio}} even if it wasn't patent nonsense. While the person would have led an interesting life, I'm not sure any of the claims made meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I commend your very careful interpretations of policy, but I don't think "contested prod" describes what just took place here.  The original author removed the prod tags, did not address the concerns raised by the prod, and responded by adding a phrase to the article about the subject having a rare disease so that 15% of his bloodstream is composed of beef gravy.  I think this pretty clearly falls under #G1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)