Deletion of Monika (Doki Doki Literature Club!)

Comment: on a procedural basis, per other users about the nominator's bad faith nomination. The nominator appears to be unfamiliar with the  guideline and did not make the appropriate deletion argument for this AfD, instead relying on Wikipedia:Other_stuff_exists#Deletion_of_article|the argument that if Freddy Fazbear isn't notable, then so isn't Monika, or a nebulous and vague concept of "real world notability" when it is not proscribed or defined anywhere in the  guideline. There is clearly significant coverage by multiple independent reliable sources, the popularity (or lack of or waning etc) of the game itself does not necessarily have a bearing on whether the character is notable or otherwise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: per , bad faith nom. Additionally, the amount of coverage is enough to warrant an article, see {{slink|Monika_(Doki_Doki_Literature_Club!)#Reception_and_analysis}}. The article is even somewhat close to being the  of Monika, imo
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:PRIMARYTOPIC)

Comment: to Doki Doki Literature Club, the sources dug up are a bunch of passing mentions, unreliable sources, and sources that only mention the character in an in-universe context, none of which contribute to notability. I am not seeing the coverage necessary to pass 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to ''Doki Doki Literature Club!''. According to , "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." I believe most content here is scrapped together from other reviews, only really being mentioned by most. How the entire reception section describes her, these are simply reviews about the game, but they ''could'' possibly dedicate their own section explaining her and why they like her. However, this is not the case; the ''Kotaku'' source says "Monika’s writing is disarming and sinister" and that's it. Not only that, it talks about her in context of the other three, too
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)