Deletion of Ashley Qualls

Comment: Meets  as she has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per the articles brought to the table in the arguments above. I also disagree with the argument above that "This article has clear tones of a personal LinkedIn page because it only focuses with what she herself would advertise to clients and that is always enough for deletion, regardless of what could be said." I personally don't see the usefulness of  when a quick chopping to stub size would suffice perfectly fine, only take a few extra minutes, and leaves the topic in place so that less-experienced editors like IPs can add to it over time, without the hurdle of page creation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: The FastCompany article is an in-depth profile from a reliable print source. Combined with the other coverage over the 7 years between 2007 and 2014, there is clear notability. The current version is not promotional, is well-sourced, and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)