Deletion of Rolando Gomez (2nd nomination)

Comment: Please remember to |assume good faith when commenting here. There is nothing wrong with this deletion nomination. No one has a right to be in Wikipedia. If the subject is notable and there are |verifiable third-party sources, then the article will most likely be kept. However, per Wikipedia guidelines, the subject does not appear to pass notability standards per  and appropriate sources have not been brought forward yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:V||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I don't think the article should necessarily be deleted, as I think the subject passes , but the information must be properly sourced, and only information from reliable third-party sources must be used. It would need the |Heymann Standard for a keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:HEY)

Comment: There are no |verifiable third-party references to establish |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOTE)

Comment: Not properly sourced, probable |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: The lack of |citations from |reliable sources means that this article fails to comply with the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:V)