Deletion of Henry Blomberg

Comment: per  and . Although the award of the Distinguished Service Cross is highly admirable, it does not make one notable enough for inclusion per Wikipedia's guidelines, particularly with the extreme lack of sources on the subject aside from the decoration's citation. If there were further sources on the subject's life than perhaps the guidelines would be satisfied, but I do not believe this is so. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: Lack of reliable sources with more than a passing mention in it, thus failing . At the heart of it, that's why it fails and should be deleted, although the fact that the recipient only got the DSC (not maligning, a very good achievement) and not something like the Medal of Honor or Victoria Cross doesn't help either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I wondered about this when I saw the author creating a slew of these articles, but didn't want to be the one to step up and say that they were all non-notable.  It's true that  says a person who does not meet GNG may still be notable if he "has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for one."  In one sense, the Distinguished Service Cross is notable—we have an article on it—but then we have an article on the Purple Heart too, and we've given out 1.3 million of those.  So I thoroughly agree that the Distinguished Service Cross doesn't count (without more, obviously; see Distinguished Service Cross (United States)#Notable Awards|here).  I think the idea of the ANYBIO guideline is to streamline the notability consideration of people who receive or are nominated for awards whose recipients and nominees are generally notable under GNG.  But DSC recipients and nominees are generally ''non''-notable under GNG (Henry Blomberg too), so I don't think a case for notability can rest on this award alone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)