Deletion of Telegraph Road Bridge

Comment: This is really a  case; references are not RS (two of the three are junk and the third is not a suitable ref); we have some refs for existance but almost zero quality sources for WP-notabilty.  However, the real problem here is the text which is just junk/almost inchoerent (probably pasted in from some technical document) and bears little useful discription to the subject to any reader (e.g. it is useless).  Of course, the core issue is that there are just no refs from which to build a proper useful article on this structure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: I was mistaken about the rarity of the bridge (confused it with another Telegraph Bridge) This bridge is not particularly notable. Th study gets wide coverage, but the structure does not have notability.'''Keep''' . passes  {{tq|Artificial features related to infrastructure (for example, bridges and dams) can be notable under Wikipedia's GNG. Where their notability is unclear, they generally redirect to more general articles or to a named natural feature that prompted their creation, e.g., to an article about the notable road it carries or the notable obstacle it spans.}} It is apparently an https://historicbridges.org/bridges/browser/?bridgebrowser=michigan/telegraph/ historic bridge ..."rare example of a multi-span concrete through girder". Notable enough for the government to https://www.michigan.gov/som/0,4669,7-192-26847-500463--,00.html spend 1.8 million dollars to save it. https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/wayne/2019/06/21/telegraph-under-construction-redford-bridge-repairs/1528416001/ Detroit Free Press. We should clean it up, not delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:NGEO)