Deletion of NGC 5582

Comment: needs expansion and research, clearly, but plainly meets #4 for being discovered in 1788. I have no experience in this area, so I can't say whether that counts for much or what the prevailing feeling on this guideline is, but it suggests that this is likely notable? At ''worst'', it should be merged into List of NGC objects (5001–6000). The MfD is partially concerned with the creator's many frustrating attempts to get this past different reviewers by removing the AfC decline template without doing any work on the article; now that this exists in the mainspace and has sources, that doesn't really apply. —&#8239
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTCRIT)