Deletion of Plane Stupid

Comment: Notable based on the references and the press coverage of its actions. NPOV isn't grounds for deletion. I've no idea how  applies. fD states "When making your case or responding to others, explain how the article meets/violates policy rather than merely stating that it meets/violates the policy", and the deletion proposal fails to do that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:A)

Comment: there are numerous sources covering not just its actions but also the organisation itself, easily satisfying . POV issues (if exist) are fixed by fixing the article content, not by deletion. Which part of  do you think the article fall foul of
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT)