Deletion of Lepanto opening

Comment: Sharp's book was published in print before being moved to the web, and at least some of the player zines have consistently high quality and serious editor review, making them . As for whether they are ''independent,'' insofar as there is no monetary stake in the game (such as, say, for employees of Hasbro), so I would say they are in the Wikipedia sense. This support is weak because, well, I am as capable of being swayed by strong emotion as anybody, and I was most strongly delighted at encountering so old and familiar a friend in so unexpected a place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Appears to violate , as it's instructional material for playing a game.  It's possible for an encyclopedic article to be written on a specific game strategy, but this isn't it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO)