Deletion of Fred Ajudua

Comment: Does the article represent fairly, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources ()? I just summarized content from the most obvious sources, which are all negative and focus on the criminal activity and damage it caused. Ajudua seems to be notable for his frauds. If there are reliable independent sources that are more positive, perhaps sources that describe Ajudua's philanthropic efforts mentioned in earlier versions of the article, this information should also be included. My cursory check did not turn up any
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)