Deletion of Terrestrial Based Relativity

Comment: The article appears to have been written by the person who devised the theory, and links only to a website with his presentation of the theory. It does not appear to have been published or discussed in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal, and receives only a handful of mentions on blogs or websites http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Steve+D.+Gage%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7ADBF. Does not satisfy the basic requirement of |notability by having substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. Wikipedia is not a forum for initial presentation of new scientific theories
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Since no one seems to have mentioned , allow me to be first to say that it doesn't contain enough independent source material to meet that criterion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: but |Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: WP:OR|Original research and cannot be |verified. There is no publication of such theory in any academic journals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Sorry, Steve. We're not professors or scientists. We're just a bunch of editors who like to share |reliable knowledge for everybody. We're not interested in the theory itself, whether it is correct or has some flaws. If you are a scientist who developed this theory, then you'd probably known yourself that this is not the correct media to publish it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)