Deletion of Kevin Scott

Comment: Article is clearly promotional in tone. A selectman is not notable. A ''candidacy'' is not notable. Especially not a candidacy for a primary. Especially not the ''Republican'' primary in Massachusetts.  If the article is kept it needs a radical POV-ectomy and careful watching, since there is at least a possibility of campaign staff involvement in the editing of the article. I note too that the article cites no sources inline, and the only sources mentioned, external links, are Scott's campaign site, and a site which merely presents politician's stated views (i.e. essentially self-authored); in the case of an intrinsically controversial topic, this kind of site can't be considered to meet |reliable source guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)