Deletion of David G. McAfee

Comment:  in terms of  just doesn't exist to support this one.  We must follow the policies set forth in  and  as well.  The subject of this article fails on all counts.  The required, secondary sourcing is nonexistent--instead, we have his own website as a source, which is never permitted in terms of .  Neither can his self-published books be used as sources, as they themselves are non-notable according to , having received zero media attention.  Also have a look at  to learn more about self-published sources.  These are just a few of the WP policies that argue for the deletion of this article.  What this youngster writes about, and how well-known he may be among fellow atheists, has nothing to do with WP notability policies and is therefore irrelevant to the discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:RS||WP:BK||WP:SPS)