Deletion of Smell Detection Agent Optimization Algorithm

Comment: per , , and . Louder, for those at the back of the class: We have never published | original research, and after 20 years, ''everybody knows this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SNOW||WP:SALT||WP:OR)

Comment: two previous incarnations of this article have been deleted as a |blatant copyright violation. While this ordinarily would have absolutely no bearing on this iteration, I have just had to remove a good 500 bytes of copyvio from the current article, and if this AfD closes as keep it'll probably need |revdel. However, the article is mostly original research without any secondary sources cited, or it seems, available to cite - it thus fails our notability and verifiability policies and needs to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G12||WP:RD1)

Comment: Fails  with basically no independent secondary RS coverage of this specific algorithm (basically just https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-014-0182-0 this and https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61833-3_53 this from the article creator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: non-notable and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:VERIFIABILITY, : except for a vague description of the algorithm, the article contains only a long list of "can be used for", without any indication that "it has been used for". Also, there is no evidence that the algorithm improves the state of the art in any way. If it does, we must wait for articles that demonstrate this. Also, : "Do not base an entire article on primary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:PRIMARY)