Deletion of List of minor Star Wars Jedi knights (2nd nomination)

Comment: Absolutely no #Real-world perspective|real-world notability; fancruft is the only description.  Written entirely from in-universe point of view, and there really is no real-world content or context, and none can really be added -- there just isn't any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: I probably suffer from a case of , but this seems to be one of the more relatively important Star Wars lists, compared to others. I could be persuaded to support some of the more trivial lists being shaved off, but since Jedi are such a central part of the Star Wars universe, I'd say this should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Per  this list qualifies to have its own page since it is too long to be put onto a parent article without making that article too long. Minor characters deserve mention, and this is a good place to put all of them without each having their own pages. This does not qualify for  since it's not any of the things talked about there, in fact it qualifies for  instead. Fancruft is not a valid argument pe . Just because the title states that they are minor does not mean they don't get included in an encyclopedia, Example: Minor presidents of the US would still qualify for mention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:IINFO||WP:PAPER||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)