Deletion of Kara H. Eastman

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at  is ''holding'' a notable political office, not just running for one. To qualify for an article without having to win the election, a candidate must either (a) have preexisting notability for other reasons that would have gotten them into Wikipedia ''regardless'' of their success or failure in any given election (which I call the Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) be referenceable to such an unusually large volume, depth and range of coverage, far exceeding just what every candidate can always show, that she has a credible claim to being much, much more ''special'' than most other candidates in some way that would pass the |ten year test for enduring significance (the Christine O'Donnell test). This article is showing neither of those things, however. Furthermore, it's evident that the middle initial is present in the title ''solely'' to bypass the fact that the uninitialed Kara Eastman already exists as a redirect to the election, pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kara Eastman (2nd nomination) — but just altering the ''title'' does not mean that the earlier discussion isn't still binding on whether she qualifies for an article or not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:10YT)