Deletion of Homosexuality in the Batman franchise

Comment: The state of the article could be improved upon (I think in particular its overall structure is due for a revamp), but the sources meet .  This section was spun-off from Batman#Gay interpretations, which used to be much longer. Merging back into that parent article would be undesirable, given its length. It is to be expected under  that this topic will be covered in multiple broader-concept articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: there are plenty of relevant sources.  http://www.openbibart.fr/item/display/10068/865214, https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=szk6RwLmWw0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA330&dq=batman+homosexual&ots=6w5Bv8x15I&sig=FMXZbKfOF9Rqu3NLw1o6j-OJ30w#v=onepage&q=batman%20homosexual&f=false and http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21504857.2015.1127267 are quickly found example of what seem to be quality scholarly discussions in academic sources.   says
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The proposed deletion argument sounds like |a matter of personal taste. There do exist reliable sources that support the article on its own. It is also a good way to keep this material in as a |summary in the main Batman article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SUMMARY)