Deletion of James A. Graham (psychologist)

Comment: This seems to be a borderline case. Citations, as Xxanthippe have noted, start off very well, but are not sustained. He has coauthored a book which is held in multiple libraries, but we've only found one independent review of it (after a bit of Googling around, Choice seems to be it), so we have an otherwise (borderline) NN academic who is the author of a book that just fails . and the book is the subject of instruction at places other than his own school http://www.csun.edu/~csbs/departments/pan_african_studies/documents/syllabi/Okoye-Johnson-PAS-420-Fall09-syllabus.pdf, and has received multiple reviews (Choice, and http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/cdp/14/4/391/ here in an APA journal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: With a GS h-index of 4 (please correct if wrong) he fails rof#1 and any other section of rof. Too early as yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P)

Comment: Fails , I cannot find any editorial coverage, only links to his own publications and university bios
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The number of references in the psychology literature, as mentioned above by Xxanthippe, are woefully below anything sufficient to meet . As for , I don't think that 1 review establishes notability under that guideline either. Finally, there's no indication at all that this meets  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per  - author of an important book, and a full professor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE)