Deletion of Ehsan Sehgal (3nd nomination)

Comment: the subject meets . I've kept ''Daily Dharti'' sources out of my analysis as per comments by user Landscape repton. Here's my analysis of the selected sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: i hope this can be safely deleted per  because it is poorly sourced biography of relatively non-public figure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: as per . I don't know Dutch but English and Urdu are not enough to prove individual notable. Special:Contributions/111.68.107.38|111.68.107.38
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I will stick with the consensus from the previous two AfDs, which is that the subject is deemed notable to a sufficient standard as required by . https://www.dawn.com/news/1325879 This piece on Dawn mentions him amongst Pakistan's notable English language poets, which is interesting. That being said, I need to cross-check and look further into the Urdu sources available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per ;  refers explicitly to "'''Poorly sourced''' biographical articles" (my emph.), which this most certainly is not, and therefore does not apply. It also requires that there be "here is no rough consensus", yet, as we are on the third attempt to delete the article, it could be cogently argued that a "rough consensus" has plainly been estabished. In any case, per , "Page deletion is normally a last resort." Other delete !votes fail to present sound policy-based arguments: Greenborg's, for example, is an alphabet soup with no focussed explanation for the soup presented, BLPREQUESTetc does not apply, and other suggestions ('refs are a mess', for example) are pure .  presumably also applies :) Incidentally, regarding the question as to whether BLPREQUEST is relevant, this may well be a continuiation of a previous request; but I note that, actually, the filer has made https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Moona+Sehgal&project=enwiki over 75% of all their edits to ''improving'' (that is ''adding'' material to) the article for the last '''six years'''. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:BLPDEL||WP:ATA||WP:IDLI)

Comment: Whenever somone try to fix the issues page had they start emptying the content from different identities or IPs using internet censorship circumvention tool. I don't think it will work again. They are doing what they had done in 2012. This way they think somone will save article again. Because of dubious references per , fail to verify per  he fails , ,  or  or whatever article says he has done
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:SOLDIER||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: This article is supported by twenty-eight reference from major publications in the Indian subcontinent, such the ''Daily Jang''. It passes  and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Sehgal|previous AfDs supported keeping this article. {{nowrap
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)