Deletion of Kilgour-Matas report

Comment: Whilst I agree that the article generally satisfies , , , , and OT, I find the article a long way from POV|neutrality, and I have grave reservations that it is ever capable of complying with this |pillar of Wikipedia; Needs to be watched carefully to ensure it does not become an |attack page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:BLP||WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:5P||WP:ATTACK)

Comment: Has reliable sources and is about notable people and organisations. Meets , , POV, , and , and is not excluded by OT
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:V||WP:NOT)

Comment: or '''Merge''' per  and the previous merger proposal - while the subject is notable, it is a part of a larger issue of illegal organ transplantations in China, highlighted by other investigations by US Dept of State and Harry Wu which came to different conclusions. Solely by their coverage and sources alone, we can have separate articles on US Department State investigations on illegal organ transplantations in China and Harry Wu investigations on illegal organ transplantations in China, but Wikipedia doesn't function that way. The fact remains that K&M remains the only source claiming that organ harvesting is targeted at FLG practitioners, that allegations has never been proven, that K&M is closely associated with FLG and receives most of their publicity from them, and that no further progress in the allegations has been made since - K&M continued to make their accusations and give conferences, the PRC government continued to deny the allegations, and third parties continued to "express concerns" without actually proving anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)