Deletion of List of large cemeteries

Comment: as "large" is too vague and subjective to make this a useful list and is inevitably going to make this a magnet for . Even if we get rid of that by insisting that a reliable source uses the term "large" the standards used by reliable sources will vary hugely. This is very different from a list of the ''largest'' of some category of object, as it is possible to objectively verify that (say) the Sun is the largest object in the solar system, whereas it is not possible to objectively verify that some cemetery is "large
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The topic passes  -- for example, see https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DCV8J8uyvjcC&pg=PA96 The Largest Cemetery or http://www.citiesjournal.com/14-cities-with-the-biggest-cemeteries Cities Journal.  The complaint about uncontainable is absurd as we already have a massive list of cemeteries, which covers them all.  That's organised geographically which isn't very helpful if you want to browse the biggest of them.  This list meets that need and, as places like ''Wadi-us-Salaam'' are quite incredible, there's no shortage of notable entries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: does not meet  or , also without reliably sourced inclusion criteria is open to editor interpretation that could give rise to .  ps. {{u|The Rambling Man}}, i look forward to seeing List of large cats, ROAROWWWR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:GNG||WP:OR)