Deletion of Katherine Grant, 12th Countess of Dysart

Comment: meets ; as comment above states, there is plenty of (non trivial) detail from the Times obituary that could be used to flesh this out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I think I'm coming down on the side of keeping articles on peers or their heirs, whether or not they sit in the House of Lords, as all their predecessors did (and therefore all meet ) and it would be slightly odd and not of value to the project to break the chain of Wikipedia articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: there are some good sources here, including her obituary in ''The Times'', so notable per . ''NB'' also the comment of Jimbo Wales at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gordon, 7th Marquess of Aberdeen and Temair and elsewhere: "There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub.  Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part of a wider series, is mistaken
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)