Deletion of Combined gas law

Comment: No, I completely disagree with this proposal to merge into Ideal gas law. This page, as it exists, functions well and encyclopaedically  to demonstrate how the 'combined gas law' is derived from derived from Boyles, Charles' and Guy-Lussac's laws and how it can be applied. It's fundamental to science. If anything, the Ideal Gas Law page ought to be merged into this one, and the reference cited by {{u|Tigraan}} in their merge proposal serves only to demonstrate this. And here's another https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=puSfBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA159#v=onepage&q&f=false for chemistry dummies that demonstrates the same. That there is no historical section to show how the combined gas law derived from Boyles, Charles' and Guy-Lussac's laws is totally irrelevant if multiple sources demonstrate (as they do) this is a scientifically recognised term and a notable topic in its own right - which, non-chemist though I am - I firmly believe it is. This page stands alone as a simple-to-understand page on an important law, separate from the more theoretical Avogadro's law-based Ideal gas law, albeit they are closely allied. Either keep these two articles distinct, or merge Ideal gas law ''into this one'', not the other way around! The proposed target page is already complex enough, seems less significant than this page under deletion discussion, and the target  written in a less non-encyclopaedic tone, using the 2nd person voice (you) as if it were a classroom workbook (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTEXTBOOK)

Comment: to ideal gas law and mention the use of this term per {{u|XOR'easter}}; this is a  that can adequately be addressed there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)