Deletion of Geek humor (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article certainly has plenty of room for improvement.  For example, it currently makes no mention of ''The Big Bang Theory'' - an example of geek humour which is a mainstream success and which is http://www.sciencemag.org/content/320/5877/740.short reviewed in detail in this context by ''Science'' magazine.  Our |editing policy in such cases is to keep the article in mainspace and we have no deadline for specific improvements.  The nomination is thus an example of an  argument to avoid:- 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: I agree with Milowent.  And I don't see that anything has changed since the last AfD: this is still an article on a pretty clearly notable topichttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22geek+humor%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq= that hasn't been improved yet.  No real reason to delete this now, better to |preserve
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)