Deletion of Surface Unsigned

Comment: I tihnk you're assuming bad faith here when there's no need to. First off, I linked to the previous discussion (that's why ''"an MfD"'' is highlighted in blue in my nomination). Second, given the way the MfD closed, I think it's perfectly reasonable to get some more eyes on the article to establish notability. I never questioned the reliability of the sources, I'm saying there isn't enough of them to establish any notability.  isn't the reason I nominated. Notability is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: the nomination acknowledges that the festival is a nationwide festival, that has been in existence for several years,  However it goes on to say: ''"it '''hasn't garnered enough attention in reliable sources for me - just a few local articles''', some standard gig-listing stuff, and a very occasional article on the spat that the organisers had with some bloggers"''  Since when are regional broadcasters or regional newspapers not considered ?  No offense but it seems to me nominators arguments may just boil down to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)