Deletion of Politics of Gatineau Park

Comment: per |Wikipedia is not a soapbox. An attempt to merge would be likely to lead to the same battle all over again. The Gatineau Park Protection Committee/New Woodlands Preservation League editors should recognise that they have a |conflict of interest here and should devote their energies to setting up their own campaigning website. Any short summary of these issues in the main article should be done by a non-COI editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:COI)

Comment: I don't mean to act too eager in any way, but I noticed that the contributions (particularly edit summaries and pages edited) of two |single-purpose accounts !voting here are awfully similar: Special:Contributions/Ryanslane and Special:Contributions/BudgeC (who claims to be Special:Contributions/99.246.2.69
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: per  and .  If it were not for these issues, this would be a fairly good article, it is well written, aside from , and referenced properly.  I do think it needs to be rewritten with a NPV by someone without COI issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:COI||WP:NPV)

Comment: as a contravention of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: This article makes a strong case in support of the writer's goal rather than a balanced and objective portrayal of the topic suggested by its title. It makes one side of an argument and in so doing fails to meet the fundamental principle that articles must have a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view.  It should be kept somewhere, but not in Wikipedia.  Advocacy, even if the position advanced is worthy and desirable (who knows because we only have one side of this story) has no place in an encyclopaedia.  See .  Rather than asking whether it can be made into something that has a place here, the question should be why try to change it into something it isn't.  The changes it needs would change the whole nature of the article. Rather than asking whether a sow's ear can be turned into a silk purse, the question should be why try? It should go someplace else, it has no place here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVOCATE)