Deletion of Hennessy Carolina

Comment: or (second choice) '''Redirect''' to Cardi B where she is already mentioned. It's definitely not a delete (see  : "{{xt|That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A ... However, person A may be included in the related article on B."}}) which implies it sure isn't a speedy. The sources I get when I hit the "news" link all appear to be female-oriented with an emphasis on fashion and gossip, but that doesn't make them unreliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INVALIDBIO)

Comment: there is some coverage in reliable sources, and she's not just known for being Cardi B's sister. Barely passes .  Once the upcoming show airs it would be a full keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While she is primarily known because of her relationship with Cardi B, there is plenty of non-trivial coverage of her so that the article is verifiable and easily passes . In fact,  even addresses this situation directly: "Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERIT)

Comment: into Cardi B#Family. Clear case of , looked through the sources mentioned here and on the page and saw nothing except brief mentions, and as
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERIT)

Comment: I'd say this was premature, but it's only a matter of hours old. It's a deletion solution in search of an issue. Even a cursory glance of search engines and news aggregators shows clear passing of  through significant non-incidental individual coverage. Special:Contributions/2600:1000:B035:EFC0:2258:715B:CEBF:1F92|2600:1000:B035:EFC0:2258:715B:CEBF:1F92
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Is Wikipedia messing up? It shows that this is the first edit for IP User 2600:1000:B035:EFC0:2258:715B:CEBF:1F92. If that is right then to jump right into an AFD  and policy seems strange. I am not trying to |assume bad faith but can only see what I see which would seem to indicate a possible |SPA or something
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:ASSUME||WP:SPA)

Comment: per ; the contents are just an aggregation of gossip, and we are not a tabloid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: or '''Redirect''': To be honest I find zero reasons to keep but am contesting |ignored WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines and head counts. Everything I find is associated with ''Cardi B'', as exampled by the first round of nine |refbombed sources (all but 2: Really! check them out) by user:Lonehexagon, and so important to push that they were repeated in a round two, surely proves that notability is |inherited. One article admits http://www.vh1.com/news/346921/hennessy-carolina-style-gallery/ HENNESSY CAROLINA ALMANZAR IS NOT AN EASY PERSON TO GOOGLE. Add to this that of the 12 references on the article the VH-1 news is the only one that does not include either "Cardi B" or variants of "Cardi B's Younger Sister". An event that is scheduled to occur but has not happened yet per |crystal ball (what Wikipedia is not) and her sister splashed on almost everything "Hennessy Carolina" would seem to make it apparent that |I like it (not valid reasoning) or |IAR (better valid reasoning) as the only real justification for keeping
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:REFBOMB||WP:INHERITED||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IAR)

Comment: or '''Redirect'''. I think the  is strongly relevant to this discussion, and I do not believe this person to be independently notable enough on her own to warrant her own article. Much of her fame and status is based far too heavily off her sister, and any possible notable output is based off being a recurring character in one reality show (and appearing in an episode of a game show in the future). The article itself reads like a saccharine |gossip column, unencyclopedically describing her significant other as "mysterious" while only giving a first name (possibly an abbreviated variant, even). As well, 2 million social media followers should not, by itself, be basis for Wikipedia inclusion, since that is not suggestive of anything other than HC's follower count and social media usage. to conclude, the article, in its present state, has no basis for existing on Wikipedia, and is written without respect for encyclopedic prose or standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERIT||WP:GOSSIP)

Comment: This article passes  for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."http://www.vh1.com/news/346921/hennessy-carolina-style-gallery/https://www.bet.com/style/living/2017/09/11/hennessy-feature.htmlhttps://www.vogue.com/article/cardi-b-sister-hennessy-carolina-instagram-stylehttp://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/who-is-hennessy-carolina-152636http://www.newnownext.com/cardi-b-lesbian-sister-hennessy-carolina/09/2017/https://www.bustle.com/p/who-is-cardi-bs-sister-hennessy-carolina-is-pretty-famous-on-her-own-3906710http://www.vh1.com/news/327282/hennessy-carolina-and-her-super-cute-mysterious-girlfriend/ It was also just announced Hennessey will be one of 10 stars competing in The Challenge: Champs vs. Stars (season 3)|''The Challenge: Champs vs Stars'' season 3, which will only further increase her exposure.http://www.vh1.com/news/355575/booby-gibson-hennessy-carolina-the-challenge-champs-vs-stars
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)