Deletion of Alexander Dvorkin

Comment: this article does need some attention, since the sources are out there but not being used in the article.  His activities, the failed lawsuit, and the organization he belongs to provides enough evidence for  (he is not known for only one event or one activity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: prolific writer and academic who has also been the subject of  secondary source coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Clearly notable individual, per  standards and also per impact in his field. Just follow the links in the template above: you'll find plenty of coverage in books (e.g.http://books.google.com/books?id=YRPcAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Alexander+Dvorkin%22+-inpublisher:icon&dq=%22Alexander+Dvorkin%22+-inpublisher:icon&as_brr=0&ei=GOEpTdH6GKfmyASu2titAQ&cd=8, http://books.google.com/books?id=WW-XcDe-IMEC&pg=PA106&dq=%22Alexander+Dvorkin%22+-inpublisher:icon&as_brr=0&ei=GOEpTdH6GKfmyASu2titAQ&cd=5#v=onepage&q=%22Alexander%20Dvorkin%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=6L8oAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Alexander+Dvorkin%22+-inpublisher:icon&dq=%22Alexander+Dvorkin%22+-inpublisher:icon&as_brr=0&ei=GOEpTdH6GKfmyASu2titAQ&cd=9 (where he is called the "most prominent fighter of the totalitarian sects"). The http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Alexander+Dvorkin%22 news coverage is also outstanding; here he is called http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/14889 "a leading critic of sects". In short, he is no run-of-the-mill fellow, he is apparently the most important critic of sects in Russia, with plenty of sources to demonstrate it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)