Deletion of Gérard Mussies

Comment: despite JLACO's ineffective and TLDR defense above. I found enough reviews on JSTOR alone to convince me of a pass of  – Dio Chrysostom: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43848419, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26149729; Morphology of Koine: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42610772, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3263706, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3263706; Der lateinische Text: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41657278, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23962509, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24657949; Studies in Egyptian Religion: https://www.jstor.org/stable/218611
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The citations look reasonably solid, and this gives a marginal case for .  I didn't find reviews (probably because of the age of them), but some of his books are widely held according to WorldCat.  The combination of the two looks like a reasonable keep case.  I also considered a delete argument per , but I removed the primary-sourced bulk of the article, and what was left still seems to me a reasonable stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:TNT)

Comment: The subject doesn't have a Google Scholar profile, so it doesn't calculate an h-index for him, but this is a little misleading.  From a casual perusal, it looks like his h-index is at least 10.  His Koine Greek book has 86 GS citations.  It may be that some of these are not showing up in Scopus because of their age.  It's on the light side for , but plausible.  A  case also looks possible, though finding reviews of works this old can be difficult (I didn't immediately succeed).  I share some of your concerns about the current state of the article, and note that the main contributing editor seems to be pushing a POV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR)