Deletion of CSV application support

Comment: If deleted all the information should be ported into the Comma-separated values article where it wouldn't fit neatly.  Far better, as at present, to use a hat note to annex-out lists from the main text pages.  Sources are given in the form of external links – they should be formatted properly but they do exist.  Doing that would avoid the  criticism.  The list clearly is not a programming guide, it merely points the reader to libraries and modules.  To fall under  there would need to be explicit code examples showing calls to the libraries.  In short, all that needs to be done is to sort out the references, checking that they are still relevant/up to date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:EL||WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: WP:FAILN and is an |indiscriminate grouping of material. Totally unsourced article (showing since 2006), hanging around apparently mocking a multitude of WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines. Indiscriminately links, that looks impressive, but does not offer any "support" for |notability. A search did not find anything to show anything either. Maybe it should not have been moved. Of course, if it had the same lack of sources while in the other article just maybe it shouldn't have been there either. In 2015 and 2017 issues were raised and a merge request placed. Nothing was dealt with. "Seeing" or "not seeing" a supposed point is not the issue. We have policies and guidelines, as well as broad community consensus, that notability- be established by reliable sources. Just because someone |"likes" an article does not mean we should have it either. I can't even see a basis for a stand alone article if it were blown to bits and started again from scratch. What would be the sources? Produce a couple so I can look
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:LIKE||WP:notability)

Comment: per nom on everything but also as well as . This looks more like a programming guide rather than an encyclopedic list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: Fails . Specifically there is nothing showing that THE LIST (rather than simply the items in the list) is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)