Deletion of Ezatullah (Sorubi, Nangarhar, 2001)

Comment: no offense, but I think there is a difference between notability and notoriety.  Nominator seems to be suggesting that the holder an important political position has to be famous (ie notorious) in order to merit coverage here.  I suggest being a leader of a provisional government makes an individual notable.  Nominator asks: {{quotation|It may be argued that he is automatically notable as a district governor (is that sub-national?) per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I think systemic bias may be an issue here; see . &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: Please do not put words into my mouth; I never suggested that anyone has to be famous in order to merit coverage. Accusing me of such shallow and trite thinking is an uncalled for insult and distracts from the issues at hand. In quoting me, my suggestion that "in which case the information here should be merged into another more detailed article. It cannot stand alone as an article" was left out, thus giving more credence to the above interpretation what I may be "suggesting". Taken together, I am suggesting that  as a policy does not automatically override the policy guidelines at , it merely suggests that the material should be on Wikipedia ''in some fashion''. There are many subjects on Wikipedia that are notable, but do not have their own article; for a long time The Angry Video Game Nerd was deemed notable enough only to have a section about him in ScrewAttack. Later, when more sources came out, he was given his own article. You have suggested that he is notable per , fine. But why not merge this into some other article, '''delete''' this redirect as it is a highly unlikely search term and create a link to the section from the Ezatullah page. If all that were to be agreed upon, then I would obviously withdraw the nom. At the moment, however, I feel that it is appropriate to |boldy draw some attention to this issue by suggesting that this individual article be '''deleted'''. There is simply no evidence of enough sources to support a full, POV|neutral article here. I also view the "is it the same guy" question as an irrelevant distraction but, if anyone disagrees, they may view my response to this on my
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:N||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BOLD||WP:NPOV)