Deletion of Veritasism

Comment: The whole thing's  from start to finish
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: Discussion of this alleged religion is completely unreferenced and unverifiable. Clearly fails , ,  and , and is also written as essentially promotional material by one of its adherents. This is a likely candidate for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS||WP:VERIFIABLE||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SNOW)

Comment: Only fractionally better than some kid's |made up subject. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: The creator of the article seems to be under the impression that |just because something exists means it is notable.  It's important for information on Wikipedia to be verifiable, and I acknowledge that it is a real concept, but it is not sufficient.  The topic appears to have no scholarly impact as it has not been discussed in relevant journals.  It does not appear in news sources, and the hits for the Internet bring up forum and YouTube listings.  Veritasism is a slam-dunk candidate for not meeting  and should be deleted fast per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS||WP:GNG||WP: SNOW)