Deletion of Armands Strazds (3rd nomination)

Comment: The info links at the top of the page yield almost zero, so this polymath hasn't had much overt impact on the English speaking world = no . None of the references in the article come back as reliable, dedicated, secondary sources. And it's fun to ask for a delete on this since some of the article's editors have disguised other Wikipedia articles as outside sources. A polymath with no notoriety in the English speaking world. Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The only real source is the Latvian Musical Information Center bio. That's not enough for , , or . See also two closely related AfDs, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rational numerals and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta numerals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICIAN||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: As per nom. I see no case for . This is just self-promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: even if this subject was notable based on ''independent'', reliable sources, this article would require a complete rewrite to meet NPOV and BLP, so  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: He has 3 (apparently independent) Latvian bios/interviews, an article about his failed political run, and various mentions in other places, which seems like enough for . There are apparently big NPOV issues (that should be tagged/fixed), but AfD is a decision between "an extremely biased article with verifiable sources" and "no article at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)