Deletion of Luis Acevedo Andrade

Comment: although I'm certainly willing to reconsider this if SalmanZ's promise to find better sources actually pans out with better sources. Leading a political party (if he really did that, which seems to be up for debate) would certainly be a valid ''potential'' notability claim if it were |properly sourced, but it's not an instant notability freebie that exempts a person from actually having to have enough real media coverage to get over  — but of the two sources here, the one that contains content about him is unreliable and the one that is reliable doesn't even mention his name at all, so we're batting zero for establishing that he would pass GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)