Deletion of Secret Pakistan

Comment: and allow continued improvements per .  I note that  shows that the topic met  and  before being nominated for deleition... and simply |needed work. And to the nominator, film topics NEVER need "academic coverage" in order to be |ascertainable as notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:HANDLE||WP:NRVE)

Comment: spaced ndash}} Per '''''' and because the topic passes . Examples include: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/last-nights-viewing-secret-pakistan-bbc2-the-impressions-show-bbc1-6256354.html, http://realscreen.com/2011/10/26/bbc-doc-aims-to-reveal-secret-pakistan/, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Pakistan-dismisses-BBC-claims-on-supporting-Taliban/articleshow/10541985.cms
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:GNG)