Deletion of Pure blood theory in Korea

Comment: I see "" being thrown around alot, but no one has yet been able to explain why that is so. Can someone actually please point out where the violations are, so they can be improved? It's better to contribute positively rather than |killing everything with fire, is it not? If these nationalist newcomer editors are really as passionate in perfecting an encyclopedia article as one might claim, than that would most ''certainly'' be the case, no? If something has a chance of being fixed, then  is not necessary, and the "problem" is not an excuse for deletion.  definitely applies here. Accuse me of  all you want, but I honestly don't know how I can  anymore, given the current situation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:AFD||WP:AFD||WP:SOFIXIT||WP:ABF||WP:AGF)

Comment: seems to be well sourced. The topic is at least as legitimate as fan death (not that I'm suggesting , lol
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: inb4 , and . You should all be aware that this is not a !vote;  is made from collecting arguments together, not by numbers. If someone told you to come here, then I suggest to cease in your partisanship. So far I have seen few of the delete !votes with a subjective discussion; they're all "this is an attack page against Koreans, this is an outrage". I seriously do not know what to say
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS||WP:SPA||WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: well sourced, informative as an encyclopedic article should be, and if you believe there are synthesis issues, room for improvement is not an excuse for deletion. Additionally, I question the nominator's intentions, given my previous experiences with the said user: so when a controversial article comes up, it's generally fine, but when it's about Korea, it must be eletion process|destroyed with fire
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)

Comment: This document isn't |NPOV. Because, This is just non'korea'cal opinion of connected japan people. Therefore, need delete. Thank you
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Not a valid argument for . See also Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELETION)

Comment: It's . Although the sources are reliable, the conclusion is an orginal research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)