Deletion of List of highest paid musicians in 2008

Comment: for poor sourcing and the  concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Fundamentally fails several provisions of  policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Regardless the , the content is encyclopaedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: no sources available. In the External links, there are two articles that talk about Sofia Rotaru, one Forbes article for the "world's best-paid music stars" from ''2007-06-01 to 2008-06-01'' (not from 2008), and one unsourced blog post that utterly fails . Consequently, none of the external links can be used as sources for this list. Additionally, my cursory google search turned up nothing that isn't a duplicate of the latter two sources, or irrelevant. Even ignoring the COATRACK and SYN issues, this article is unsourceable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The |synthesis issue is a big one, in my mind.  You can see it blatantly in that the article lists the top 10 (as "sourced" from Forbes' top 5 and a blog), and then simply plugs Rotaru into the second place slot based on the two non-English sources, leaving a list of the top 11 earners (11 isn't exactly a standard measure, not outside This Is Spinal Tap|Spinal Tap).  As for , given the top #11 count and lack of any inline citations, sufficient, non-synthesized references, and non-English sources, I think it's a valid argument.  I'd have to disagree with you, Rirunmot, I don't see what makes it encyclopedic.  I don't think it's |notable, and it's on shaky ground as far as |verifiability goes, even aside from usage as a coat rack. ~ Amory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:COATRACK||WP:N||WP:V)