Deletion of Women in Lebanon

Comment: Nomination fails , with no discernible rationale. Sourcing concerns addressed by Colapeninsula. As the other arguments are based on assertions alone, I have no recourse but to assert to the contrary, but I will base mine on facts. Counter-assertions: 1. the article is not OR, 2. does not stray from the topic, and 3. is not incoherent. 1. The article's content matches that of found sources, therefore it is not OR. 2. It does not stray from the topic; it at times delineates women's position relative to that of men by stating the men's position. This could be rewritten if it were necessary. 3. "Incoherent" means absolutely nothing, being utterly subjective, and is unaddressable as an argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)