Deletion of T. C. McCarthy

Comment: as subject crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds plus has received significant critical attention thus meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: McCarthy's books have received a fair amount of attention, in some major venues, such as ''http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/mar/27/exogene-tc-mccarthy-review The Guardian'' and ''http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2011/10/sci-fi-trench-warfare-in-germline/ Wired'', and some not-so-major venues, including ''http://www.strangehorizons.com/reviews/2012/02/germline_by_t_c.shtml Strange Horizons'', ''http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/metro/2011-07-24/authors-persistence-pays?v=1311547313 The Augusta Chronicle'', and ''http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2011/11/exclusive_interview_tc_mccarthy_on_military_sf_and_the_reality_of_war/ SF Signal''. An editor claiming to be Mr. McCarthy himself has http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AT._C._McCarthy&diff=499351083&oldid=498797170 promised to provide |reliable sources to verify claims in the original article that he is a Fulbright scholar, etc.  I don't know that such claims will bolster notability any, but if they are verifiable, they are certainly appropriate for inclusion in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)