Deletion of Chad Dunn

Comment: I completely agree. I had actually considered nominating this for AfD a couple days ago, and just hadn't had the time to do a full . As mentioned above, the independent and reliable sources are not significant coverage - they only mention him in relation to the cases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: pretty heavy ing but upon closer look Dunn isn't really ever the (or even ''a'') focal point in the reliable sources used. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: per nom. Minor coverage does not meet notability guidelines. Reads like a resumé for a typical attorney. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)