Deletion of Animal Charity Evaluators

Comment: The IP's comments have convinced me that the two sources in my initial comment (now struck) are , and all of the sources mentioned by the IP are primary, closely connected to the subject, or non-RS. (The only possible exception is William MacAskill, author of the first book and the guardian piece which is just a passing mention; the second book is by Nick Cooney who is closely connected to two groups which are heavily promoted by ACE.) This means we have no hope of an article, even a stub, that satisfies NPOV. ACE currently has a brief one-line mention in Effective altruism#Other organizations, which is probably all we can do with the sources available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:BIASED)

Comment: Agree with {{U|Eric Herboso}}. Even if a couple of those sources are authored by people with connections to the organization (and I think we should be sympathetic because charity evaluators are by their nature well-connected), there are still plenty of entirely independent |reliable sources listed above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)