Deletion of Richard Tylman (2nd nomination)

Comment: Tylman's team was given an Award of Excellence at Graphex (a notable competition). It seems to me that he satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Most or all of the reliable-looking sources are actually a form of |synthesis and thus |original research. The sources are used as primary references in an attempt to assert notability, ''the subjects work has appeared in all these famous places, so he must be famous too''. No, he does not appear to be notable.  Sprinkling an article with impressive-looking references does not work when the references don't talk about the subject. I do not see any substantial coverage of the subject by reliable sources, therefore, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:OR)

Comment: Appears to meet . General concerns about retaliatory/Wikipolitical nature of this AfD are unfortunate and so I wouldn't object to another nomination later but it seems like they meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Not notable. There doesn't seem to be any in-depth coverage of the subject from any source online, and the piling up of all the sources that each have a trivial amount of detail doesn't amount to much. Google News and Google News Archives don't seem to have anything on him at all. If the nomination and some of the !votes appear to be bad faith, then the closing admin should ignore them (what a distasteful job to try to sort them out). DGG says "Keep" because of the circumstances of the nomination, but it's better to handle this as normally as we can. Tylman's website doesn't include a section on reviews of his work or mentions in the press, which I would expect from someone who is reviewed or covered in -type sources. Although it doesn't look like a notable one under Wikipedia guidelines, its an impressive, varied career. If we had reason to believe that much better sourcing existed and was likely to be put in the article, I'd change to Keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)