Deletion of Auburn Avenue (publication)

Comment: in accordance with #A7 (applies to web content such as this). The article makes no credible assertion of significance, and cites zero sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. This is  and clearly an attempt at using Wikipedia as a publicity platform. The rationale by the COI editor above, "to delete it would be unfair to its small yet still recognizable presence" is preposterous. Wikipedia isn't about fairness. A publication don't get an article merely for existing. If a subject is not notable, it doesn't merit an article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: insufficient coverage by acceptable  which contravenes content policies , , and . Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion . Also unable to meet criteria for GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:WEIGHT||WP:PROMO)