Deletion of List of electric vehicle battery manufacturers

Comment: Lots of blue links, and those articles have sources (though most of them need to have their references checked, and more added).  NJGW: most of the articles weren't in fact created by Mac (though he's edited most of them) and even if they had been, that's not the point - let's talk about the article, |not the editor.  It's a list that's of interest to a very small number of people, granted, but why not leave it here for that small group?  ikipedia is not paper|Wikipedia is not paper.  I did wonder whether it should be converted to a category, but that argument could be made for any list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:W)

Comment: At the very most should be a table within Electric vehicle battery, or a :Category:Electric vehicle battery manufacturers|category. Also, VERY shaky on sources. Example: the list claims JCS supplies electric batteries to Ford, Chrysler and GM in the United States Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC). But if you read the citation it only says that the USABC (whose members ''include'' Ford, Chrysler and GM) have granted a funding contract to JCS which "will focus on the development of lithium-ion battery systems for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and over the course of two years will seek to validate the commercial feasibility of lithium-ion technology for mass market PHEVs". That is MUCH less than what the article claims. Another example: Axeon and Porsche, for a car which does not (yet) exist, and the citation doesnt say if the car will just be a one-off or mass-produced. Another problem: References 1,4,5,7,9,11,19 & 22 are just external links to manufacturer websites, not real citations. Padding, as per the nominee's rationale of  #14? All this looks like is a list of companies which build a product and a list of their customers. How is that encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:ELNO)