Deletion of Care-O-bot

Comment: All references in the article which I checked are self published. I checked some of the sources presented here in this discussion and find them also to be self published. Both of the sources which {{u|TYelliot}} state that they are derived from press releases, which make them . {{u|Shanata}} similarly provides a Gizmag review which is also a press release derivative. Medical technology is a gimmicky sector which does a lot of SEO strange publishing, including having sketchy writers parrot reviews and press releases. These are not 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:RS)

Comment: This article clearly meets ; as multiple people above have pointed out, several independent, reliable sources have covered various versions of Care-O-bot, including multiple |reliable sources already in the article (http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/home-robots/care-o-bot-4-mobile-manipulator and http://www.gizmag.com/care-o-bot-flirty-robot/35662/ and additional sources found by Esquivalience).  I re-wrote the paragraph that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Unsalvageable promo. I suggest using 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: The only references are the subject's website and a press release.  There is no  | reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)