Deletion of Kathryn Borel Jr.

Comment: user|Rirunmot}} writes that the three references in the article establish notability, but they do not.http://www.nationalpost.com/related/topics/story.html?id=2010333 The first source provides one sentence context about the book; the rest of the article is a long excerpt from the book. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470153903.html The second source is a listing from a website that sells books. http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/books_9780446409506.htm The third source is also a listing from a website that sells books. Because of the dearth of coverage about Borel's book, I doubt that the book is notable per .http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Kathryn+Borel+Jr.%22 Google News Archive does not return any sources that establish Borel's notability. Of the five articles there, http://www.canada.com/life/story.html?id=1007299 the first and http://www.nationalpost.com/rss/story.html?id=981796 second are articles written by her. http://www.canada.com/travel/Travels+with+mother/1682053/story.html The third is a passing mention. http://www.financialpost.com/scripts/story.html?id=1236311 The fourth is written by her. I cannot evaluate the http://www.canada.com/travel/Opinion+Travis+wasn+crazy/1313437/story.html the fifth one because the page is blank. A Google Books search also returns no relevant results, save for a http://books.google.com/books?id=R5P9NwAACAAJ&dq=%22Kathryn+Borel%22 book that was written by her.In sum, Kathryn Borel Jr. fails  and  because she has not been covered in multiple, independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I can't find significant coverage for this |author
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)