Deletion of Kelly Gould

Comment: This is a really tough article to determine notability on. There's a very good argument she meets , but  doesn't trump , and she definitively fails . The only article I've seen that's specifically on her which doesn't cover her in a passing mention is the ''Jewish Journal'' article, but that's in their "Graduation" section, which profiles young people graduating from high school, and I don't think counts towards Wikipedia notability - they profile a number of people every year. Even if it did, there are no other articles I can find which cover her significantly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: The notability test for actors, if you're shooting for "notable because she's had roles", is not passed just because the article ''says'' that roles have been had — it is passed only when |reliable sources ''attest'' to the "majorness" of the roles by paying attention to them and/or her. For example, a film review can help speak to an actor's notability if the critic singles the actor's performance out for special praise, but does not help speak to the actor's notability if it just mentions their name a single time in the cast list endnotes. Simply listing roles does ''not'' hand an actor a free exemption from having to have any sources, because then every actor would always get that free exemption the moment they had a second role. It doesn't take ''as much'' reliable source coverage to get a person over an SNG on "meets a specific notability criterion" grounds as it does to get a person over GNG on pure "just because media coverage exists" grounds — but it still takes more than ''none'', and ''no'' SNG ''ever'' confers a free exemption from having to show any evidence of reliable sources at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Once  always . See Noah Raby - notable for lying at the turn of the century. Still notable 100 years later. Eastmain is correct
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If all the sources allow us to do is list off her (mostly minor) roles, that's not enough to hang an article on. Even if the article were to be kept, all the unsourced BLP, including her birthdate, would need to be removed. Her reluctance to say the word "asshole" is practically the definition of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)