Deletion of EWay

Comment: Article cites 40 references including many from national/international news organizations and business journals. Coverage is significant and in-depth. Use of self-published sources (such as press releases) is limited and not unduly self-serving. Exclusions at  apply to few if any of the sources. Clear GNG pass. Article's tone is arguably somewhat promotional but not irretrievably so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: per . The tone of the article is overly promotional and it reads like a vanity page. The details are mostly of partnerships and announcements, originating from the company, such as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: Fails . There is a smokescreen of sources in the article, but they are either not RS or routine coverage. A search for sources shows a lot of PR but hardly any significant RS. Many of the RS I found are routine news which seem to be redressed press releases. If the SMH source is the best we have, then I'm afraid I have to go with a delete. From what I see, the company is marginally notable and exactly in what we call  territory. It is an emerging company and maybe in 3-5 years there might be better coverage. But till that time, I will go with a delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON)