Deletion of Online Abuse Prevention Initiative

Comment: Delete |Non-notable topic due to Wp:SIGCOV|insufficient coverage in |reliable sources. The requisite coverage now appears to be there, if ''The Guardian'' and ''USA Today'' are writing about it in depth then it's |notable. (And thanks to {{u|Bosstopher}} for the ping, it didn't work for some reason but I saw it on my watchlist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The organization and its activities have attracted significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources—specifically, the group and its campaign against ICANN's proposal to de-anonymize domain name WHOIS records are the subject of full-length articles in ''The Guardian'' http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/07/icann-plan-to-end-website-anonymity-could-lead-to-swatting-attacks and ''Clubic'' http://www.clubic.com/internet/actualite-773098-icann-coeur-polemique.html.  There also appears to be some brief and indirect criticism of the group in other sources such as ''Breitbart (website)|Breitbart'' http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/06/03/renowned-author-calls-out-randi-harpers-amazon-trolling/—I'm not sure whether this is admissible (even under ) as it's more about the group's founder personally than the organization itself.  I have just expanded the article on the basis of the ''Guardian'' and ''Clubic'' coverage; if anyone wants to make a case for including anything from ''Breitbart'' I suggest that this could be discussed on the talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:BIASED)