Deletion of Acronyms in healthcare

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: clearly passes . Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A simple  style search shows this topic to be highly notable, with whole books devoted to healthcare and medical abbreviations: https://books.google.com/books?id=jh1rAAAAMAAJ&dq=healthcare+abbreviations&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjs3aSu09XWAhWCsVQKHQizDzgQ6AEIKDAA Mosby's Survival Guide to Medical Abbreviations & Acronyms, https://books.google.com/books?id=u3aKCwAAQBAJ&dq=healthcare+abbreviations&source=gbs_navlinks_s Dorland's Dictionary of Medical Acronyms and Abbreviations E-Book, https://books.google.com/books?id=FMfkPQAACAAJ&dq=healthcare+abbreviations&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjs3aSu09XWAhWCsVQKHQizDzgQ6AEIRzAF Stedman's Pocket Medical Abbreviations.  There are plenty of online resources, to supoort such a list, too, https://www.tabers.com/tabersonline/view/Tabers-Dictionary/767492/0/Medical_Abbreviations Tabers Medical Dictionary, http://stedmansonline.com/webFiles/Dict-Stedmans28/APP06.pdf Stedman's online, https://www.hanys.org/search/?action=terms HANYS Healthcare Acronyms & Terms, etc. With such sources available, verifying glossary entries is a matter of editing, not wholesale deletion. WP supports glossary style articles (MOS:GLOSSARIES) and this is one of them. If editors wanted to restrict to only abbreviations of notable topics, i.e., get rid of the red links, that would be OK, too, but it would make the glossary less useful
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)