Deletion of Michael L. Vincent

Comment: Again your personal assumptions are not relevant to this debate regarding the notability of Michael Vincent. I have respond to the comment, and assured you I have no conflicts of interest. Like you I've been |assuming good faith. This is my first article, and I believe he is a notable addition to wikipedia so I have added it. 5 min after adding it, it was consistently tagged for speedy deletion, and passed despite the continued attacks. The evidence has been disregarded. It is a shame there are many who seem interested in arguing in the removal of relevant wiki material
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (:WP:AGF)

Comment: per |our guidelines on conflict of interest, ''if you have a conflict of interest avoid, or exercise great caution when: 1. Editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with, 2. Participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors...'' You have failed to do either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (:WP:COI)

Comment: how so? I've been |assuming good faith all along on this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (:WP:AGF)

Comment: Sources? There's still no |evidence he passes WP:MUSIC '''TRAVELLINGCARI
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Non notable musician, no non-trivial sources, fails  I have done a google search and cant find any published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent or independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)