Deletion of Communist genocide

Comment: This is , and the article seems to be used for some kind of advocacy. I have found absolutely no evidence that the term "communist genocide" (as referring to an universal concept) even exists in credible sources. Taking a quick look at some of the references used in the article, there is no indication that it is even a real term. For example, the article says ''Former Vietnamese judge Nguyen Cao Quyen who was a victim of communist political repression after communist victory in Vietnam War describes communist genocide as "genocide of entire classes"'' (clearly implying that the source is talking about a universal concept "communist genocide", but the source actually says: ''Since 1945, the Vietnamese Communists exterminated religious leaders, assassinated opposition leaders, killed intellectuals, businessmen, and even peasants who disagreed with their ideology. These terrorist acts were crimes against humanity and the genocide of entire classes.'' Thus, it does not use the term "communist genocide" at all. It seems that this article is being used as a vehicle to invent a new concept and give credibility to it. I'm sure all of this material is present in the articles about the different genocides, so there is absolutely no need for this advocating, original synthesis article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: the material is appropriate, but it's being assembled in an inappropriate way; Communist genocide falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per NickD - extreme  violation, disguised by lots of sources relevant to a different article (eg List of genocides committed by communist governments). Genocide may have been committed by Communists (certainly there are sources that argue that, though the meaning of "communism" is endlessly debatable) but there is no source for the ''concept'' of "Communist genocide". Also created by banned user
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: and expand. I have a feeling that those supporting deletion have not even bothered to do a simple Google Scholar search. The term "Communist genocide" has been in use for more than fifty years, so how can it be neologism? There are several monographs and dozens of scientific articles dealing with the communist genocide, quite a few dedicated to the topic. It is a term used even within last ten days by newspapers http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/On-Vietnam-Cronkite-told-it-the-way-it-wasnt-51751487.html. Several countries have laws dealing with communist genocide. So claiming that it didn't happen, isn't notable or the term doesn't exist is quite frankly, ridiculous and laughable. If the article is POV in your opinion, add opposing viewpoints - but that does not make article suitable for deletion, Wikipedia isn't censored. All other given reasons for deletion come down to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per Abductive.  If the concept is notable, please show me one single ''academic'' publication that deals with "communist genocide" as a topic, not mentions it in passing in relation to specific events which may or may not be a part of a bigger picture.  Communist regimes committed many atrocities, yes, but it is not our job as Wikipedians to collect them all in one place and present as a concept.  That's a textbook example of what |synthesis is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as a POV fork, , , and , redirecting to Genocide and distributing content between there and Communism.  &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)