Deletion of Sia (software)

Comment: A  internet search has not produced any substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. There is a company that uses a similar name but it's not the same as the subject of this article. I've noted that two of the users above, {{u|robvanmieghem}} and {{u|alexpimania}} are Single Purpose accounts working with the creator of the article. As a side note, the speed of filing an AfD has no bearing on any discussion - I don't know how long people really expect articles about non-notable subjects to remain on Wikipedia but there's no minimum cooling off period, particularly in the case of an article that's promotional in nature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I don't see any sources which would go toward demonstrating notability under the |general notability guideline. In fact, I think there's an argument that it qualifies for speedy deletion, criteria A7
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While I was initially supportive of userfication it has become clear this is being used solely for |promotion, and
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: While this article does have no references it was tagged with a PROD and then an AfD within a relatively short amount of time of the article being created (hours), not giving the editor much time to improve the article (they did remove the PROD so they must be aware of the issues). I would suggest Wikipedia:Userfication|userfication here to allow the editor due time, to avoid coming across as |bitey
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)