Deletion of Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka

Comment: There is fundamental flaw in the argument that State Terrorism is only related to the Sri Lankan civil war war and that it should be covered under that article. First rebuttal is that State terrorism allegations precede the civil war and that it covers issues beyond the civil war and secondly even within civil war article itself State terrorism would be a sub section and at some point it will become its own section because of size constraints. One cannot cover all salient aspects of a civil war and issues that out side of the civil war within that article and be consistant with .State terrorism is a neutral term just like massacre, murder and such which have very encylopedic articles in Wikipedia not just in blogs and NGO statements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE)

Comment: Allegations of X by Y" is the standard naming practice for problematic issues. I do not like this wording, but it appears the most NPOV title possible. I would support move to another title if a better suggestion is made. If the government's actions are covered in , then they should be included. If RS happen to express 'how evil the government is', well, then this should be included as well. There is no policy that excessive negative press should be excluded from wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: That is not true at all,  demands that within the article itself one can balance out the statement of allegations with denials by the GOSL itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)