Deletion of Growing Earth Theory

Comment: I changed my mind on '''move''' after reading response. ontent forking|Forking is not relevant to these articles, avoiding consensus &c. are not issues.  But I now know a bit more, having read it thoroughly.  I do regret having brought Hollow Earth theory to the attention of !  '''Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:SCI)

Comment: as |POV fork of valid encyclopedic article expanding earth theory.  While Neal Adams is serious in his promotion of this fringe science, the idea that Adams' ramblings about fundamental physics qualify him as a notable scientific researcher is definitely a joke
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: This page is not about Carey's work, but that of an amateur follower of his. Giving undue weight to fringe theory. The article fails to demonstrate that there is any coverage of this theory (not even debunking of it) in reliable sources independent of its inventors. #Exceptional claims require exceptional sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: plenty of sources are cited to establish that this theory is notable. The theory itself may be junk, but it isn't the role of Wikipedia editors to make that judgement. |Verifiability, not truth, is the threshold for inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: why do people continue to debate the scientific validity of this article as a reason to decide one way or another on the deletion debate? Remember |Verifiability, not truth, is the threshold for inclusion, which is official policy. The extreme crackpotiness of this theory has no bearing on whether it should be kept or not. Notable loons will get articles about them and their theories. The article certainly needs re-writing so it presents itself as "famous crackpot guy claims.... blah blah blah" instead of presenting itself as "blah blah blah is true" but re-writing issues are not by themselves a reason to delete an article. They call for cleanup tags instead
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)