Deletion of Wholeness axiom

Comment: Besides the initial work of Corrazza, this has been studied by Hamkins ({{MR|1816602}}) and Apter ({{MR|2914539}}) and is well-known enough in its subdiscipline that, in a review of one of Corrazza's paper, reviewer Bernhard A. König can write "The author has long been interested in an axiom called the Wholeness Axiom" ({{MR|2298604}}). That meets my (very low) standards for  for a research contribution (it has been the subject of reliably published works by multiple independent researchers or groups of researchers). In addition, I'm inclined to trust the judgement of article creator {{u|R.e.b.}} on whether this is actually significant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: without prejudice to possible recreation at a later date once more sources become available (if they ever do). My review of the literature on this subject only seems to show the term existing in citations (rather that as a subject of actual discussion), and those are all to the original publication by the person who apparently coined the term (i.e., P. Corazza, who is given here as the only source for this article and who is therefore a  source and not suitable for establishing notability).  I was unable to identify any non-trivial coverage of the term.  As a  (?), it doesn't look like it warrants inclusion here until people other than the person who devised it start writing about it.  That doesn't appear to have happened yet (and, of course, might never happen).  Also, let me echo
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:NEOLOGISM)