Deletion of Police Misconduct in Pasadena Texas

Comment: would appear to be a classic  case.  We don't have a similar article for any other town that I could find (although there is Maricopa County Sheriff's Office controversies).  If there's reliable sources anywhere that say Pasadena has an unusual degree of police incidents then perhaps that might be appropriate in the town's article, but a short laundry list of issues in an article of its own isn't going to fly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a police blotter nor a tabloid. It is  and . There was one instance only that would be allowed in the main article (Pasadena). Names should not be used to start with. The main point seems to be to humiliate these people who are not career criminals or as a current indictment against the police department. This article appears to be the result of numerous deletes from the main article for reasons given there. Probably should be quickly deleted. Appears that someone has an axe to grind. This sort of thing apparently appeared in the Houston article, as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:POV)

Comment: Clear |POV violation from someone with something against police officers in suburban Houston. Several of the 'sources' like this one named http://www.civiliansdown.com/Outlaw%20Cops%20in%20Texas.htm "Outlaw Cops in Texas" are clearly RadarOnline-esque in quality and in the sarcastic tone of the writing and should never be used in a serious article at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)