Deletion of Padmanabhapuram Palace

Comment: Nominator would do well to read otability before suggesting that others might need to. The gbooks link above gives significant coverage. If there are concerns about copyvio, then identify the problem and fix it, mark it for G12 if it qualifies or take it up to the copyvio noticeboard. If there are concerns of style then clean it up or tag it. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: A Google search for Padmanabhapuram palace returns http://www.google.co.in/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=en&source=hp&q=padmanabhapuram+palace&meta=&btnG=Google+Search 152,000 hits. A Google Books search returns http://www.google.co.in/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=padmanabhapuram%20palace&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp 1,490 hits. Besides, there are also articles in http://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/பத்மநாபபுரம்_அரண்மனை Tamil and http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%AE%E0%B4%A8%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%AD%E0%B4%AA%E0%B5%81%E0%B4%B0%E0%B4%82_%E0%B4%95%E0%B5%8A%E0%B4%9F%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%9F%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%B0%E0%B4%82 Malayalam. Being an inclusionist, I feel that bad quality of prose is not reason enough for deletion. And unless |copyvio is proved, the article cannot be tagged
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)