Deletion of Chikkajala

Comment: Passes  as a legally-recognized village (https://archive.is/6qE5d
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Per , the reference sources and content still can expand it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: I agree with user MB. Chikkajala is a populated & legally recognized village, so it meets . I've added a couple of reliable sources. The https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chikkajala&oldid=813587021 Afded version can also be sourced from articles like http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report-3000-year-old-site-in-bangalore-is-history-1675707 this one. There seems to be http://searchindiannews.dx.am/search.html?query=Chikkajala#&gsc.q=Chikkajala&gsc.page=1 healthy coverage of it in reliable sources. There also seem to be few historically important http://searchindiannews.dx.am/search.html?query=Chikkajala%20historic%20site#&gsc.q=Chikkajala%20historic%20site&gsc.page=1 sites there. So it can be further expanded & should be kept. BTW, there are zillions of villages/towns in every Indian district, and it's not possible to even list their names in their respective district articles, let alone merging them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)