Deletion of Stuart Campbell (video game journalist)

Comment: I think the article is in awful shape at the moment. In fact, I'd say it's one of the worst I've read. It is a bit aggrandising, and it does reek a bit of conflict of interest. But an article being a bad one is not a #Reasons for deletion|reason to delete. There is no doubt that this person has been notable. As
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: I believe the subject passes one or two points of  (under 'creative professionals'); his involvement with Amiga Power, for example. Has this AfD been pointed to from a forum, or something? That's an awful lot of unsigns and IPs up there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Aside from the |single-purposes trying to prove a Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point|point, I note that there are several external links scattered throughout the text of the article that would need to be made into Wikipedia:Citing sources|references via the  tag. Further, if notability ''was'' temporary, as nom suggests, then why the heck do we have Mahatma Gandhi|articles Alexander the Great|on Julius Ceasar|people Winston Churchill|who George Washington|would've Socrates|stopped Marie Antoinette|being Tokugawa Ieyasu|notable Che Guevara|long Ho Chi Minh|ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)