Deletion of List of teetotalers

Comment: well-sourced and a reasonable topic for an almanac, even if it's not terribly encyclopedic.  It is bordering on indiscriminate, but that can still be addressed through normal editing rather than |blowing it up and starting over
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: After my first comment I was hoping regular editors of the page would come forward arguing the case that this was indeed a notable characteristic of the individuals listed.  Or at least, they recognised the page had some problems, but please point out any entries that are dubious.  It is now clear that there is no one curating the page and it has become a coatrack for every passing mention of someone being teetotal.  I sampled the references randomly myself to check this.  The very first one I looked at was John Ashcroft.  There is nothing in the source until a passing mention right at the end.  Not only that, it is a passing mention in a quote from his wife which itself is a passing mention in the article.  So a passing mention in a passing mention.  Looking at a few more, many of them are much the same - passing mentions.  Plus, a lot of the sources are dubious reliability to say the least - gossip mag articles and the like.  Cleaning this up would be a ''huge'' undertaking.  So contrary to Power~enwiki's comment above, I think that  ''is'' the answer in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)