Deletion of Cortez Jordan

Comment: meets the |general notability guideline "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets notability guidelines per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: I do not think it's clear that being a test cricket umpire is sufficiently notable by itself, and these articles are not immune from the requirement of WP:RS that indicate notability. The references given don't indicate notability, (and they are all the same reference too). In addition, those were added after my nom. At this point the article needs to not only assert notability, but be notable. The assumption repeated here, that hasn't been well explained, is that all test cricket umpires are notable. I think that's a misunderstanding of . Take a look at List of NBA referees for a point of comparison. The articles that do exist have claims to notability ''in addition'' to their status alone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)