Deletion of List of condominiums in the United States

Comment: I don't see how this list needs any particular sourcing. I can see that all of its contents have articles, which I have to presume fit the applicable notability and sourcing criteria. The list itself is neither trivia nor duplication. As others have said, it's by no means unusual to have a list of this size or nature. My only content gripe is that it ought to be called "List of notable condominiums in the United States" since by design, it excludes all but a few. That would also dispense with any  objections, which I consider poorly founded in situations such as this. --Special:Contributions/69.204.153.39|69.204.153.39
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Qualifies for an article per  relative to :Category:Condominiums in the United States. Regarding page size, lengthy sections can be  into new articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:SIZESPLIT)

Comment: per  as complementary to :Category:Condominiums in the United States and per  as a standard index of articles. The nominator's complaint that this is primarily a bare list of article links that lacks an intro section is tantamount to admitting that they are unfamiliar with both lists and deletion policy. Any list can be expanded with annotations (not that this is required), and we do not delete content for fixable issues
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a directory. If we are going to have this we may as well have lists of gas stations or pharmacies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)