Deletion of Harold Hofer

Comment: I'm not sure that a military college counselor, by itself, makes one notable.  Have the |new editors forgotten  to add something
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: I'm not seeing that  is met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: There are many fine men and women who are not sufficiently notable to warrant an encyclopedia article, and countless villains who are. This subject seems to be in the former category. But if substantial coverage from independent, |reliable sources can be found, now or in the future, then we should have this article in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: by no means a form of disrespect to the Marine Sergeant Major, the subject received passing mention in http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=sL4sAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xSYEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6125%2C2630346 one |non-primary or secondary reliable source, however that is insufficient to pass . Therefore failing GNG, the subject fails SOLDIER & |ACADEMIC, and thus I am inclined to supporting deletion of this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS||WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)