Deletion of 63336

Comment: No valid reason given for delete. Significant coverage in at least 3 s - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/20/AR2009042001529.html, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/22/what_colly_did_next/ and http://web.archive.org/web/20120623220702/http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/watchdog/2009/03/text_question_and_answer_compa.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: spam, per #G11
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)