Deletion of Energy audit

Comment: Which external links are problematic?  The embedded ones, or the ones listed in the External links section?  I've read the  page and fail to see how that's a rational for deletion; at worst, proper citations should be done, with some housekeeping on the more spammish links.  The tone could be improved (parts read like a brochure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:EL)