Deletion of Recovering catholic

Comment: By ikipedia is not a dictionary there should not be an article on an expression itself, although there are some anyway. (I guess by gnore all rules.) The topic of former Catholics should be covered somewhere, but under a neutral title
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:I)

Comment: Now that I've had a chance to https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Recovering_Catholic&action=historysubmit&diff=391313198&oldid=390224132 upgrade the article, there are 8 books that are referenced in the article or used as further reading; no more than 2-3 appear to be self-published, and no editor has posted a "delete" !vote since I posted research to validate the term was neither a neologism (note multiple reliable sources from 1992) nor non-notable.  I've also removed the OR, linked relevant other articles, added it to a few relevant categories, and essentially fixed all the major outstanding problems with the article that the nominator and initial !voters complained about.  applies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)