Deletion of Murat Pak

Comment: promotional article by  per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Quantity does not equal quality. These are just not the kind of facts and citations that demonstrate a designer's notability.  The http://www.awwwards.com/jury/judge/muratpak interview with ''Awwwards'' is a good example.  The brief header says he is a "multi-award winning designer" but the only awards they mention are the 2010 and 2012 Vimeo Awards, for which he was short-listed, but which he did not win. see also the web site touted by the author http://www.madinspain.com/  http://www.madinspain.com/ which has four sentences taken from a press release or resume, but without any solid facts, all hype. So it doesn't really matter that the site has no indicia of reliability. Much of the coverage cited in the article is incidental. Some are just images. It is possible that he might pass  if good solid coverage in reliable independent secondary sources could be found, but this article does not do that.  It depends on primary sources, mentions, related sources and unreliable sources. Currently it does not pass the |guideline for creative individuals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NOTEBLP||:WP:CREATIVE)