Deletion of Lord Mord

Comment: Bad faith nomination, one of three made in a single minute.  is being flouted and (semi-)automation abused
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: obviously it is a weak stub of an article, but I actually think it might satisfy criterion 1 of , it's possible it might manage another, but not being a czech expert I've not spotted that. The following comes with the usual disclaimer that my assessment of reliability etc of czech sources is a judgement call, not a known fact. That said 2 longer reviews, http://www.iliteratura.cz/Clanek/23799/urban-milos-lord-mord-1 Detailed Review (also see review of book 2 on right), https://kultura.zpravy.idnes.cz/milos-urban-vydava-lorda-morda-horor-ze-stareho-josefova-peo-/literatura.aspx?c=A081126_183515_literatura_kot Kultura review. Then a couple of borderline Sig Cov (more than trivial) reviews https://www.respekt.cz/tydenik/2015/48/drimajici-mesto-spici-roman Short review 1 (scroll down to below "Love between Dimensions"), https://kultura.zpravy.idnes.cz/magnesia-litera-pusobi-jako-podnik-jen-pro-vyvolene-fhv-/literatura.aspx?c=A090417_191133_literatura_ob Short review 2 (Either side of letter for discovery of the year
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)