Deletion of List of Watch Tower Society publications

Comment: The article is a well-organised list that would appear to be acceptable as an article per  and . The article has encyclopaedic worth, compared with Jehovah's Witnesses publications, which is promotional in tone. There is already an article, Bibliography of Jehovah's Witnesses, that provides information as suggested by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:WORKS)

Comment: per  #2,  and : "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability." Also #Lists: "Lists are more likely to be kept if they are limited in scope, are based upon concrete criteria for inclusion, have verifiable content, and have a logical reason for their construction
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC||WP:LISTPURP||WP:LISTN||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: useful list in the context of what makes lists appropriate and useful on wikipedia.  Entries do link to other articles and I'm not sure that more won't. Claims that it "fails " need to point to which of the inappropriate categories it falls into, it doesn't appear to me to meat any of them.  Article could be improved by telescoping it down to the series of publications (rather than listing e.g. each tract in a series), which are more likely to meet notability and have articles written about them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: I'm sure it's a useful list, but it's not what Wikipedia is for. Fails , just as any non-selective list of all books from any other publisher would most likely be. I'd support any efforts to move this somewhere else if there's another wiki where it could go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)