Deletion of Wiggleball

Comment: Soon to exist?  maybe. If it's notable in a year, come back with evidence. As it is, there's none. There are many small localised sports that fail on notability (the version of nurdling I used to play in my youth for one), and I'm afraid this is one. Or maybe it's one of those 'bored afternoon' things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Nonnotable game, looks like something |made up one day.  See above comment that this game is "soon to exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: A lot of the pro-keep arguers here seriously need to look at . Notability and future tense statements are incompatible. Not literally, but hopefully you get my meaning. You cannot argue something is notable because it will some day be notable. For one thing, that means by definition it ISN'T notable. For another, your prediction may very well be wrong anyway. There has yet to be a non-deletion argument made in this AfD that does not run afoul of , or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:IKNOWIT)

Comment: Even though it could exist, notability has not been established yet. Any claim to future notability is a violation of . Note: I striked obvious duplicate votes, even though I believe there are other dupes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)