Deletion of Trinity School of Apologetics & Theology

Comment: per . 45 unique Ghits out of 393, the vast majority of which directories and a few other sites picking up wiki content. Appears that the only reals source of info on the organisation is the trinitytheology.org, which we are obliged to discount as unreliable. For an on-line and distance learning course, Alexa rank in the 643thousandsth appears well below radar for notability in any event. The fact that it is unaccredited is not all that relevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: for lack of independent reliable sources needed for verifiability.  Without such sources, there's only two potential outcomes for the article:  it has unverifiable promotional material for the school, or its used to included unverifiable attacks against it.  Neither is acceptable.  Currently we're using "source by omission", which means a Wikipedian (in violation of core policy) makes factual claims based on the *absense* of information.  This is unacceptable.  We can only state something (like say something is an "unaccredited school") if a reliable 3rd party sources has made such a statement.  We can't do original research, without violating |policy, which sadly we've done by labelling this "school" as we have.  The reasons for deleting this, are somewhat similiar to the ones for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnson C. Philip
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: The school does not have "special accreditation." The "accreditor" is ran by the operator of the school, which is not verfied by any . See School accreditation and look at India. It is not listed as an accreditor from the Department of India's Education system.http://www.education.nic.in/higedu.asp A non-notable diploma mill accredited by the operator of the school. This violates  and fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:AD||WP:CORP)