Deletion of Erica C. Barnett (2nd nomination)

Comment: a writer's book that has received a couple of |reviews does not mean that the writer meets  as the book also needs to be "significant or well-known" (from point no. 3), i do not see this being the case with ''Quitter'' ie. it is only held https://www.worldcat.org/title/quitter-a-memoir-of-drinking-relapse-and-recovery/oclc/1128100875&referer=brief_results in around 22 libraries
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: per  based on https://www.geekwire.com/2016/nextdoor-reporter-seattle-forum/https://perma.cc/BT7A-F47A https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/nextdoor-flap-has-seattle-scrutinizing-how-it-handles-social-media/ etc, and besides that, meets , given that Barnett has made a unique contribution to her field, pioneering independent local journalism in the wake of mass layoffs in the newspaper industry. Numerous credits for scoops by major newspapers, TV, and other news media in Seattle verify this. See http://www.federalwaymirror.com/news/critics-say-draft-plan-from-homelessness-task-force-underwhelms/ https://crosscut.com/2019/06/seattle-times-reporter-accused-sending-explicit-messages-resignshttps://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/durkan-grants-longtime-associate-wife-of-deputy-mayor-a-720000-no-bid-contract-to-steer-seattles-light-rail-planning/https://crosscut.com/2019/07/defying-durkan-council-directs-extra-soda-tax-money-low-income-programshttps://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/as-some-wonder-what-he-does-retired-general-leading-seattle-squeeze-response-expected-to-leave-post/ Barnett also has a https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/562065/quitter-by-erica-c-barnett/ book which has been reviewed by Publishers Weekly and Kirkus https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-525-52232-4https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/erica-c-barnett/quitter/, meeting Wikipedia:Notability (books). We don't want separate stub articles about both Barnett and her memoir; it's usually best to gather someone's bio and their works in a single umbrella article and spawn sub-articles judiciously (per ummary style), as with Caitlin Doughty, for example.It's false to say bythesound.net is not independent. It's not owned, controlled by, or beholden to Barnett. Interviews definitely contribute weight to a bio's notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:S)

Comment: Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: Can we get a  please
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: The subject of this article has many bylines, but not enough RS ''about'' the subject. An unpublished book does not add to notability. The article is also full of  and, if kept, the lead needs to be completely rewritten
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFFERY)

Comment: https://www.geekwire.com/2016/nextdoor-reporter-seattle-forum/ and https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/nextdoor-flap-has-seattle-scrutinizing-how-it-handles-social-media/ provide significant independent coverage of the subject in reliable sources. They do refer to the same incident, yes, but as a prominent reporter who is not primarily known for this one incident, she clearly doesn't fall under . https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2019/07/03/40603892/after-defamation-suits-and-a-surprise-cancellation-former-kiro-radio-hosts-ron-and-don-launch-a-podcast This is a new source I found; once the article starts talking about her getting sued it's clear that it is about her rather than simply citing her. The book reviews combine with all those sources to push her over the bar IMO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)