Deletion of Wild Bunch Paintball Team

Comment: I think most of the "delete" opinions above have neglected the point that specialist sources are acceptable in establishing notability. In my opinion, the independent sources cited on the article and referred to in this AfD add up to meet . I also agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am the author of this article and this is my first experience on the editor side of Wikipedia.  In total, I have spent in excess of 47 hours researching, writing, and learning the very basics of this process.  While there are many rules in play, the most often repeated in articles addressing new writers is to "be bold."  I am going to take that advice.  states that "some reliable sources may not be easily accessible. For example, an online source may require payment, and a print source may be available only in university libraries or other offline places. Do not reject sources just because they are hard or costly to access."  A brief search of Google without results is not controlling, according to the guidelines. With regard to the requirements established in , it says that the basis of Wikipedia articles should be reliable, published sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCEACCESS||WP:RS)

Comment: Among the many links provided as references, I find none that leads to reliable sources. Article creator has visited my talk page suggesting he would find offline sources to verify notability, but I doubt that articles in ''Paintball 2Xtremes'', ''Paintball Games International'', and ''Action Pursuit Games'' would do. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)