Deletion of MGC Pharmaceuticals

Comment: Completely non-notable promo article. Fails ,  and   Large mix of references, including explanations of what they're selling, what markets they're going, distribution details into which indicates  coverage and promotion.  Even posting they're supply agreement, which is really beyond the pale. I wondered where they're putting all the ref's. It's plain native advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGCRIT||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: The article defintiely has promo issues but these can be addressed through editing for quality. In terms of notability it meets the standards required by  based on the following references: https://thewest.com.au/business/public-companies/mgc-lands-approval-for-epilepsy-treatment-study-c-432951 1 https://www.standard.co.uk/beauty/harvey-nichols-launches-mgc-pharma-cbd-skincare-cannabis-a3875791.html 2 https://www.afr.com/technology/aussie-pot-stock-mgc-pharmaceuticals-wins-license-to-grow-marijuana-20150610-ghkgi5 3. The West Australian, Evening Standard, and Financial Review are all s, the coverage extends over years,  is met since these are national/regional sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:NEWSORG||WP:AUD)