Deletion of Sexism in South Korea

Comment: but rename Women's rights in South Korea or as suggested above Gender inequality in South Korea. I prefer the former as a sounder scope for the article that is less susceptible to the temptations of POV. Try to use more books that meet RS requirements; journalistic sources are trickier to use without lapsing into OR or POV. An AfD only determines the notability of the topic; |"poorly written" is specifically not grounds for deletion. There is no reason that women's rights or gender inequality would be less notable in South Korea than in any other major country, and even the most casual search (with parameters reflecting potential renames) will show that RS exist.http://books.google.com/books?id=JdenSBo_okAC&pg=PA120&dq=women's+right+%22south+korea%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=gwOZUcX-E4nXrAH8lYHADw&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=women's%20right%20%22south%20korea%22&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=Qwmm4RJDsL0C&pg=PA21&dq=women's+right+%22south+korea%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=gwOZUcX-E4nXrAH8lYHADw&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=women's%20right%20%22south%20korea%22&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=l5EUAV4Xb5wC&pg=PA223&dq=women's+rights+%22south+korea%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FQSZUba0BoehqwGiyoDAAw&ved=0CEkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=women's%20rights%20%22south%20korea%22&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=ianCNxq591oC&pg=PA273&dq=women's+rights+%22south+korea%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FQSZUba0BoehqwGiyoDAAw&ved=0CGIQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=women's%20rights%20%22south%20korea%22&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: The subject is clearly notable. Article is in terrible shape, but those are |surmountable problems and not |del reasons
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:DELREASON)