Deletion of Neil deGrasse Tyson fabrication allegations

Comment: This is a , and we should attempt to arrive at consensus on the Talk page of the main article about how to handle the issue before creating a new article. Also, much of the "sources" are blog posts and tweets, which may violate . Certainly fails , at least until it gets more widely reported
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:BLP||WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: Several of you have mentioned |notability.  It is clear, from , that articles that do not meet notability criteria should be either merged or deleted.  The notability criteria for events can be found at , and read, in part
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:FAILN||WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: The single most common criticism above is that this is a POVFORK.  I actually read  and it is not.  Although people did object to including the information in the main article, most of the objections to including it were that it had not been mentioned in reliable sources and that it is not notable, not POV concerns.  (Some of the sources were considered unreliable because they were biased, but that isn't the same thing).  We do need to have reliable sources, but this is not a POVFORK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: As others have said, this is clearly a  for a |non-notable event.  Also probably a  vio for lack of . —&#160;&#160
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:NOTABLE||WP:BLP||WP:RS)

Comment: This grossly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)