Deletion of Disha Ravi

Comment: Based on the recent and past reporting, Ravi's  notability also appears to be based on her past and current work as a climate activist, not simply her involvement with the 2020-2021 Indian farmers' protest. e.g. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/farmers-toolkit-case-arrested-activist-disha-ravi-an-mba-who-found-her-calling-in-environmental-causes-7188792/ Farmers toolkit case: Aarey to EIA, Goa to Dehra Dun, Disha Ravi part of many climate causes (''The Indian Express''), https://www.thequint.com/news/india/delhi-police-arrests-climate-activist-disha-ravi-who-is-she Delhi Police Arrests Climate Activist Disha Ravi, Who is She? (''The Quint''), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/from-climate-activist-to-toolkit-editor-who-is-disha-ravi/articleshow/80912284.cms From climate activist to 'Toolkit Editor', who is Disha Ravi? (''Economic Times''), https://scroll.in/article/986861/who-is-disha-ravi-the-climate-activist-arrested-by-delhi-police Who is Disha Ravi, the climate activist arrested by Delhi police? (''Scroll.in''), https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/who-is-disha-ravi-all-you-need-to-know-about-the-21-year-old-climate-change-activist-held-in-greta-thunberg-toolkit-case Who is Disha Ravi? All you need to know about the 21-year-old climate change activist held in Greta Thunberg toolkit case (''The Free Press Journal
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: a clear cut case of . I can't see if she has done anything notable in her career that attracted media attention except her recent arrest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Sources before the arrest say nothing other than her interview as a part of larger article as right described above. Vague handwaves does not change this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The page was under the radar when it was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disha_Ravi&oldid=988323440 created, does she have notability? The page creator is an admin, they have voted here without declaring that they created the page, that may not be a "rule" but imo good manners I suppose. Did the article pass the exacting standards that Wikipedia requires? I checked one source, the Thomson Reuters one. An opinion piece in which the subject is one amongst the many. The article as it stood then smacks of  and ought not to have existed. Is there objectivity in how Wikipedia chooses  its subjects? My vote is to impart it. Looking at it today the subject is not notable except for her arrest. Basis of my vote is wp:notnews wp:event and wp:1E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVOCACY)

Comment: Per Aman.kumar.goel's analysis of sources. Sources do not meet . Nothing to show direct, in depth coverage of the subject. Many added sources do not even mention the subject and I question why they were added, and fail . Additionally, I think this falls into . Perhaps there will be more significant coverage in the future, but does not seem to currently meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOR||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per , including based on the sources I have added to the article, which includes in-depth reporting on more than Ravi's arrest, and includes coverage of her past activism, education, and current prominence. As a co-founder of the 'Fridays For Future' campaign, she has been referred to as 'Bengaluru’s Greta' by the ''New Indian Express'', and this may help explain the intense interest in her arrest and incarceration, as well as the prior and current coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Only being noticed over the recent arrest per . I can support a '''redirect''' to 2020–2021 Indian farmers' protest since she is one of the many who have been arrested, but separate article is unwarranted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . The person was notable much before the arrest. In fact the page was created in November 2020 with suitable citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I understand how this looks like NOTNEWS & BLP1E but there are definitely an abundance of reliable sources for this to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Significant coverage from plenty of . The above links by {{np|Beccaynr}} significantly reports about her climate activism and her role in protests which makes it clear that it's not WP:BLP1E. Also,  states, {{tq|If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate.}}, so it easily passes the notability test
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: This article existed before the single event being complained of, so not only should  be considered, but also the notability of Disha Ravi prior to arrest. In any event  has three conditions that must be met. The third is ''If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented.'' For this to be NOT met the event must be significant AND the individual's role must be substantial AND well documented. Given the depth of coverage of the arrest, and that Disha Ravi's role in that arrest was central and the arrest is well documented, I contend that the third condition is not met and so  is not met, and so the article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Lots of references from /P that are all  pieces on her as sole subject: E.g. ''https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/18/disha-ravi-the-climate-activist-who-became-the-face-of-indias-crackdown-on-dissent The Guardian'', ''https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/disha-ravi-indian-climate-activist-becomes-symbol-crackdown-dissent-n1258337 NBC'', ''https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-56068522 BBC''.  I could probably list off much of the /P list who have done piece on her (e.g. even financial-focused RS like ''https://fortune.com/2021/02/16/young-climate-change-activists/ Fortune'').  Unambigious pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily surpasses .  Well sourced article.  ot censored.  She has become internationally well known, and the coverage is world wide. {{cite news |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/disha-ravi-indian-climate-activist-becomes-symbol-crackdown-dissent-n1258337 |title=CLIMATE IN CRISIS {{ndash}} Disha Ravi: Indian climate activist becomes symbol of crackdown on dissent |quote=Ravi’s arrest prompted protests and renewed concerns of an authoritarian backlash to the farmers' protests that have rocked the country. |date=February 20, 2021 |first1=Rhea |last1=Mogul |publisher=NBC News}}  Calling the page "propoganda" is a red herring and poisoning the well argument without any basis.  Wikipedia does not make up the positions; and we rely on .  erifiability not ruth.  And such arguments are just  don't like it content disputes, that are not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:T||WP:I)

Comment: Numerous people, including her, have been arrested in relation to the 26 January riots and the alleged Khalistani separatist propaganda. That clearly does not make her notable enough to pass  and . Special:Contributions/203.192.236.24|203.192.236.24
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per  and  and
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . A good majority of  comments above haven't proven how the subject is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Fails . Not every arrest is notable. Neither you become notable just because you are a climate activist, also WP:notnews
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: although she may not be popular unlike Thai activist Panusaya Sithijirawattanakul, I feel that the subject passes  as there is a wide media coverage mainly focusing about her arrest. Yes this is a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:1E)

Comment: Article is not about a person who is notable, . The girl is only in the news as she was arrested in a case. That reason alone is not sufficient to create a Wikipedia page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Plenty of strong  coverage, goes beyond 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP1E)