Deletion of List of deaths related to Scientology

Comment: related to" is |weasel wording of the worst order. As said above "lumping seizure, accidents, and murders where scientology had varied levels of involvement makes it Polemical as an article". We know Wikipedians hate Scientology, but that does not excuse attack articles which violated {WP:NPOV|neutrality
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WEASEL)

Comment: I completely disagree that "related to" in this AFD |"present the appearance of support for statements but can deny the reader the opportunity to assess the source of the viewpoint" the article actually is "clearly attributed" through |reliable sources and provides the reader the opportunity to see where those claims come from.  As I said, the lede and background sections of this article demonstrate that "deaths related to scientology" is not a weasel concept (use of obscure language to hide the fact that the source is not given), but rather is attributed to many different reliable sources over a period of 30 years. There are many articles that paint a disturbing picture of a group or organization from which there are two different sides, but those articles are written like this one with due consideration given to weight and | neutrality (note that neutrality does not mean that if two sides are present you pick the one that is not critical, rather that you write your article giving equal weight to the reliable sources as they are presented).  No one has been able to say that this article skews the reliable sources, only sees one set of reliable sources disregarding other sources on this topic, or provides an undue weight on one set of sources.  therefore the article does provide a POV.  Oh and there is a The Holocaust|Deaths related to Nazism article, but I am not sure what the inclusion rules are over there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WEASEL||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Deaths related to Scientology" also fulfills the notability criteria for an event in itself.  As the intro/lead/lede and background sections demonstrate, this topic has |lasting effects, that have |global significance(with three continents represented in the article), with 12 |reliable sources in the lede and background which demonstrate |depth and |diverse sources, and re visitation of the theme over time (1980-2008) that indicates |duration
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:RS||WP:INDEPTH||WP:DIVERSE||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Subject of note which has received significant coverage from multiple  secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Nominator fails to provide rational for why this article as it stands should be deleted, rather argues that some future version of this article may not uphold standards.  Anyone is welcome to read the original http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_May_9#Category:Deaths_connected_to_Scientology CFD discussion on Deaths connected to Scientology where the closer did state "A few editors suggested to listify these subjects as a better alternative". All but 2 the entries in this article are Wikilinked to other articles (and if the nominator has a problem with those entires being there, this is not the format to clean up an article rather that should have been done on the talk page), have at least 2 |reliable sources (and a few have 5+ in their list notes) not only backing up the entry but tying the death to Scientology
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)