Deletion of List of songs about killers

Comment: first of all, you can not use  as a valid reason to keep an article,this is indiscriminate in the purest sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: definitely |indiscriminate list of loosely associated topics. Lyrics in general aren't very concrete evidence, so a song could ''in theory'' be about X, when it's really about Y, Z, or even ''nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Per Samuel Wantman - you are redefining what  means with all of these deletions and destroying years of work by hundreds, maybe thousands of editors to  uphold a policy that doesn't say what you claim it says
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: ah, yes "songs about killers" is a notable subgenre, although not well described here.  These would appear to be the subset of murder ballads that are non-fictional.  I find the claim that the list is "indicriminate" to not be valid.  The current article has some obvious issues with  and perhaps .  I think these could be overcome though.  Not everything in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=Articles+for+deletion%2FList+of+songs+about&namespace=4 Bulldog's graveyard is dead.  Lets tag this one with {{tl|unreferenced}} and give it some time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: per nom and above comments. This fails #INFO,  etc, and opens the way to create List of songs about ______ with whatever tenuous connection spring to mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)