Deletion of Parish (Band) (2nd nomination)

Comment: per #C6. Same as back in May
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Proof that WP:MUSIC isn't  chiseled in stone. The ''only'' criterion that is met here is #6, which, as stated above, is probably the weakest. However, we can't even ''verify'' that his band includes a member of an otherwise-notable band, so by  alone they fail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: #C6 notwithstanding, how do we hope to write an article on a band about which no reliable sources have seen fit to comment?  isn't a suicide pact; we can safely ignore it when it tells us to write an article we can't |verify
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:V)

Comment: They technically pass #C6, but none of the other criteria whatsoever. C6 is the weakest criteria going on , and as it says, "common sense exceptions should apply".  Willing to change this if some reliable 3rd party sources appear (there's very little on the Interweb short of conforming that the band actually existed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)