Deletion of Philip Skell

Comment: Skell was a member of the NAS, which is a strong indicia of notability -- it's been argued all members of NAS are by definition notable.  A h-index of 20 in google scholar, which isn't bad for a scientist whose active research appears to have been primarily in the 1950s, given its presentist bias.  Two first author articles cited by 142 and 150 in google scholar.  Note to nominator -- His denialism isn't relevant to his notability, except insofar as  issues apply.  If you think  is applicable, then please say so; if it's not, then let's not try to bias the discussion of notability based on the man's views.  My assessment of "keep" is based on his chemical research, not his denialist views
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Clearly passes #C3 and C5, and probably also C1. The denialism is a sidenote that doesn't affect his notability either positively or negatively
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Nominator, who started editing on 12 September 2012 and appears to be on a deletion spree, is advised to consult rof before making further AfD nominations in this area
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Clear pass of rof
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)