Deletion of International Bolshevik Tendency

Comment: This article is referenced only to its own website and its own magazine "1917'", along with one book which merely makes a passing reference to a quotation from the "Fourth International" on the cover of that magazine http://books.google.com/books?id=hPnr3hXv1GcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=intitle:Manifestoes+intitle:Provocations+intitle:of+intitle:the+intitle:Modern+inauthor:janet+inauthor:lyon&hl=en&ei=KFd2TdeFHNGftge97pCiBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false. Clearly fails , the applicable notability guideline. So far the Keep arguments have been on the  line of "I like it," or  "It is significant (without citing multiple reliable and independent sources without significant coverage)," or "It is useful (I looked up something in it)." These are of little benefit to the goal of keeping the article. Any political (or religious) movement can disintegrate into smaller and smaller fractions, each of which believes it is of incredible importance, but which have not been noted by independent and reliable sources beyond perhaps passing reference, or a directory listing. Their own publications cannot establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)