Deletion of Richard Rappaport

Comment: this piece of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:SELFPROMOTION)

Comment: per |policy.  and  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:VANITY||WP:PROMO)

Comment: looks to be a likely  failure, as the sources cited are not in-depth enough to establish the subject's notability. More could always exist, but the comments above seem to imply most of the coverage about Rappaport could be seen as being more closely linked to other, more notable artists. In addition to these points, the article is being used to promote the subject, and thus has been created and maintained in contradiction to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST||WP:NOTADVOCACY)

Comment: this text of evidently |promotional nature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: Even disregarding the COI issues here, the subject clearly has not received significant coverage and so fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Would seem to meet . Mentions of the subject, including in ''The New York Times'', can be found when searching "Richard Rappaport art". Subject is a student of Robert Lepper (teacher of Andy Warhol and others) and has written https://www.worldcat.org/title/carnegie-tech-richard-lepper-and-the-oakland-project/oclc/25336396&referer=brief_results a book about him. That being said, the article needs a thorough sweeping of peacockery and irrelevant detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)