Deletion of Consulate-General of the United Kingdom in Houston

Comment: fails , limited third party coverage http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?um=1&ned=au&hl=en&num=10&q=%22united+kingdom%22+houston+%22consulate+general%22&cf=all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm still failing to see anything here that establishes notabality.  Yes there's plenty of reliable sources that mention the Consulate-General but in my mind none of them meet .  Specifically
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WtM is correct in alluding to precedent. Further to that, many, many consualtes have their own articles- take Consualte General of France in Atlanta for example. They seem to be being treated rather like an extension to the rule on embassies- which are almost always notable. In light of the improvements, this article meets , though I would like to see more non-Katrina related material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not the Yellow Pages or a directory. Fails . I dispute the claim that consulates have inherent notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)