Deletion of Samsung U900 Soul

Comment: The reviews, from websites, have a promotional tone which suggests they deserve careful scrutiny to determine whether they are |reliable sources for the purpose of determining whether a subject meets Wikipedia's notability standards. Are there any articles about this product in the mainstream press? Individual models of mobile phones have no inherent notability, and many deletions in previous AFDs provide evidence of this, contrary to what Eastmain states. Phones or other gadgets which are breakthroughs and have societal effects have been more successful in past AFDs. Not every new model released by a manufacturer is automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because a couple of people review it in online review sites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per ; also heavily laden with unreferenced |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR)