Deletion of JonTron (5th nomination)

Comment: As requested, I've taken a look through the sources to find which ones establish notability. There are a lot of references to Twitter, which seems fine since the tweets are being used not for analysis or commentary but simply to prove that someone said or did something (see ). Here are some sources that look decent: http://www.tubefilter.com/2014/05/15/jontron-youtube-millionaires/ Tubefilter, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36607589 BBC (somewhat of a passing mention, but the article references his series on bootleg video games), http://www.avclub.com/article/theres-whole-new-world-crazy-bootleg-disney-video--238194 AV Club (also focused on bootleg games), http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36044000 BBC again (this time with Jafari's comments on fan-run World of Warcraft server Nostalrius), http://time.com/4150294/memes-googled-2015/ TIME (listing him among the top ten memes of 2015...yes, "memes"), and http://www.craveonline.com/entertainment/561673-7-awesome-youtube-gamers-you-should-watch Crave. With the possible exception of Tubefilter (which I'm not familiar with), these are all reliable sources and very much independent of the subject. There are also articles from http://www.destructoid.com/egoraptor-jontron-twiddle-their-sticks-play-some-games-231626.phtml Destructoid and http://kotaku.com/fans-are-upset-over-youtube-duo-game-grumps-break-up-585225892 Kotaku about JonTron vis-à-vis GameGrumps. These all add up to satisfy  in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:TWITTER||WP:GNG)

Comment: Simple Google search shows the subject is notable. If there are problems with the article, that's a reason to tag+fix them, not delete the article. People also need to remember : "we must treat newcomers with kindness and patience." Those trying to improve the article are clearly acting in good faith and making attempts to learn policy. They don't deserve the hostility some are showing them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:DONTBITE)

Comment: The subject is mentioned in several, independent reliable sources. Even if the article was deleted four times before, we can't go on reverse -ing by saying it can't ever by notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)