Deletion of List of Doctor Who universe creatures and aliens (0–9, A–G)

Comment: The individual contents of a list don't need to be notable per , and articles aren't deleted for not establishing notability per  and . The rest of this is just subjective ({{green|"Most of these are useless for the context of a general encyclopedia"}}; It also covers fiction, which falls squarely under "general encyclopedia"). If the topic of "Doctor Who Universe creatures and aliens" is notable, then I doubt there's a policy-based reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:ARTN||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per . ''Doctor Who'' creatures are covered in multiple published books, including ''The Doctor's Monsters: Meanings of the Monstrous in Doctor Who'' (2012), ''Doctor Who: The Dangerous Book of Monsters'' (2015), ''Doctor Who: 100 Scariest Monsters'' (2011), ''Doctor Who: Aliens and Creatures'' (2010) and so on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: into a single list.  While the concept of aliens in the franchise is likely notable, the vast majority of the things included on these lists are not, many of them being one-shot creatures that appeared in a single episode or product, many of them are just duplicative of entries that are already one one of the various other character lists, and most of them being comprised of information that is ''not sourced to reliable, secondary sources''.  And, passing  is ''not'' a free pass to be completely filled with unsourced information.  As Masem said near the beginning of the AFD, the major, reoccurring species (that actually can be sourced by non-primary sources, of course) from each of the three lists should be retained and contained within a singular article, but that is it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: I believe the subject passes  for being discussed as a group, and there are more than enough links in the list for it to easily pass  . As for merging, I think any merge target as well as the merged content would have its quality and usefulness diminished for being merged. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:CLN||WP:AOAL)

Comment: as sources cannot be found to establish |notability for the concept behind this list. Even if you want to assume that sources EXIST|exist, despite a lack of evidence, you'd still have trouble convincing me that we need four separate lists for the creatures alone, in addition to List of Doctor Who henchmen, List of Doctor Who villains, List of Doctor Who robots, and List of Doctor Who supporting characters. These arbitrary distinctions verge on |original research and aren't supported by the sources. We don't |fork out 8 articles on the same subject just because of the opinion of overzealous editors. Even with sources, our policies would support at most a merge into a drastically re-organized list. (Perhaps more, but not eight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NEXIST||WP:OR||WP:CONTENTFORK)