Deletion of John R. Craig

Comment: to USS John R. Craig (DD-885), which is basically the same as merging since the important content has already been merged. The only source cited in the article is https://usnamemorialhall.org/index.php/JOHN_R._CRAIG,_LCDR,_USN. This is a wiki which accepts user-submitted content, and therefore isn't very reliable. It does link to other pages, however they aren't great sources either (the guy's college yearbook, two other memorial associations and a service history). I wouldn't be surprised if there's some other brief coverage of him from when he got the medal or when the ship was named after him, but I don't think he passes . Even if having a ship named after you does meet  as a "well-known and significant award or honor", #Special cases says that subjects which meet ANYBIO but fail the GNG should be merged into another article. Since his main significance is having the ship named after him it makes sense to cover him in the article about the ship
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: to USS John R. Craig (DD-885) per above. Doesn't pass for a stand alone article, but the content will improve the target article, be less fragmented, and give the content more readership. Per , ''"Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article."'' The article as a stand alone will receive minimal readership, but as part of the target will receive much more. There is no benefit to fragmenting the content. I ce'd the article to help with the merge. &nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to USS John R. Craig (DD-885). Fails  (LtCDR posthumously awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and . No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: to USS John R. Craig (DD-885). Through all the lengthy history of this article, there have not been enough sources presented to meet the GNG. Longstanding policy (-M) permits the non-notable article to be merged into another, notable article. In this case, the USS John R. Craig is the appropriate one, since it's necessary to explain why the ship was named for him. The ironic thing here is that ''no content needs to be lost'': it can all be merged over. The only question is whether our coverage of this man needs to be fragmented into two articles, and policy is clear that it shouldn't be
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: to USS John R. Craig (DD-885), where the relevant content has already been merged to. Does not meet , so no reason to keep as a stand-alone article. A plausible search term, with a clear redirect target
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)