Deletion of List of cloned animals in the Jurassic Park series

Comment: I think the nominator meant to refer to , not . The topic meets the requirements of LISTN, even if the sources in the current article do not reflect that. I agree it needs work, but that is not a good reason to delete. I believe the article can be salvaged. I already wrote https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:AJFU/sandbox2&oldid=981170980 a different version with plenty of sourcing that I think demonstrates clear notability. The trivial plot info is almost entirely eliminated in this rewritten version, which instead focuses on real-world info, such as production details on how the animals were created for the films. Also, the page currently gets around 500 page views daily, which would seem to suggest that there is an interest in the topic among readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NLIST)

Comment: per nom. Article fails  and doesn't seem to have any direct detailed coverage in reliable third party sources. Fails  and #PLOT. Not opposed to a merge if a suitable target can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: This is all trivial and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:LISTN)

Comment: a bunch of cruft that fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:LISTN)