Deletion of Blood Out (film)

Comment: That someone may have not been logged in when making a few edits or is making edits as a new and inexperienced user does not does not automatically make them s.. simply editors without a long contribution history.  So unless either is engaged in vandalism, why not |give the benefit of the doubt, and extend courtesy and assistance?  Toward my "keep"... principle filming had begun and (perhaps) been completed (4 weeks '''is''' enough if production is tight), a trailer has been released, and the project uses the talents of many notables which which is why it is receiving coverage in reliable sources... thus meeting the cautions of  and .  |Common sense would indicate that this project will get more coverage and not less as release approaches... and as cleanup, expansion, and sourcing have begun since nomination, it best serves the project and its readers to have this article remain and |grow through the course of regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:AGF||WP:NF||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:ATD)

Comment: per . Ultimately it is a notable production and Wikipedia is improved by covering it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: It doesn't, in my opinion, fail .  Filming has started, and this has a source, and a notable cast.  No reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: F, filming started last month. this has a long way to go before release and |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: Actually, there is sense in deleting it now just to recreate it later on.  It's called .  There's no guarantee that this film will ever be finished or released.  There's no sense in creating the article before the film even exists.  Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:NFF||WP:NF)