Deletion of The End of the Free Market

Comment: per . I found some possible sources at Google news.  The first is an http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/29/AR2010012902968.html op-ed piece in the ''Washington Post'' by the author. The second is about Davos and http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/02/02/u-s-china-tension-was-the-underaddressed-theme-of-davos/ mentions the forthcoming book at CNN. An article at http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/risk-of-sovereign-default-rattles-markets/story-e6frg8zx-1225827282128 WSJ briefly mentions the book as forthcoming.  I'm not sure |these sources alone would allow the |book to pass notability, yet, so incubation is possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RS||WP:BOOK)

Comment: Not notable as far as I can see. Rather similar in tone to the publishers' blurb http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-End-of-the-Free-Market/Ian-Bremmer/e/9781591843016 with some phrases clearly cut and pasted. I also wonder if there is a |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: The article is overly |promotional. As for the sources, http://blogs.forbes.com/greatspeculations/2010/03/22/communism-is-dead-but-state-capitalism-thrives/ this review by Vahan Janjigian seems acceptable, but I don't see enough significant secondary coverage to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:BK)