Deletion of The Anita Krajnc Case

Comment: Internationally significant case. The sources they are spread over 75 days - enduring notability. See -  - "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events." Complies with  considering that sources from Canada, USA, UK, Australia, Indiahttp://www.southasianmedia.net/stories/world/anita-krajnc-woman-who-gave-last-drink-to-doomed-pigs-faces-10-year-sentence-story, Germany,http://www.animalequality.de/neuigkeiten/2015-11-02-toronto-pig-save-aktivistin-angezeigt-weil-sie-mitgefuehl-zeigte New Zealand,http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11553881 Serbia,http://www.animalequality.de/neuigkeiten/2015-11-02-toronto-pig-save-aktivistin-angezeigt-weil-sie-mitgefuehl-zeigte Indonesia,http://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20151201032157-140-95085/beri-minum-babi-wanita-kanada-terancam-10-tahun-penjara/ Belgium,http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20151130_01996459, Romania,http://spynews.ro/articole-despre/anita+krajnc/ Portugal,http://www.noticiasaominuto.com/mundo/495632/arrisca-dez-anos-na-prisao-por-dar-agua-a-porcos and Sweden,http://nyheter24.se/nyheter/820042-gav-grisar-vatten-kan-fa-fangelse cover the case including The Guardian
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GEOSCOPE)

Comment: per   because of coverage. This is clearly WP:GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE)

Comment: This article is a blatant violation of .   As
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSOAPBOX)

Comment: This seems like the usual case of incident, arrest, trial, sentencing, and appeals, so it seems like it is too early to determine enduring notability. I am also wondering to what extent  is relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)