Deletion of Windows 8.1

Comment: The Windows 8 article is way too long to cover 8.1 in a proper and in-depth manner, and |sub-articles are an accepted practice. Consensus can change, and 8.1 is also ''very'' different from previous "service packs" for past Windows versions (which, aside from XP SP2, were usually just a collection of relatively minor patches
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SUBARTICLE)

Comment: The topic is |notable, and it's an acceptable  of the Windows 8 article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: Hello, everyone. Truth to be told, this article is problematic, ill-advised, badly written and created against consensus. Its subject does not have |due weight and its existence potentially |gives equal validity to a point of view that is not just that valid. In an ideal Wikipedia, this article should never have been written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE||WP:GEVAL)

Comment: The main issue here is  - whether the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  There are thousands and thousands of articles to establish that this topic easily means GNG.  In fact, there are so many, I won't even bother listing them here.  The other arguments invoked by the OP are based on apparent misunderstanding of Wikipedia policies and the AfD process in general.  So I won't bother explaining how the article does not violate  and  because it does not matter.  Articles about notable topics that can be improved through the normal editing process are not supposed to be deleted.  Instead, they're supposed to be improved through the normal editing process
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTCHANGELOG||WP:IINFO)