Deletion of A Thousand Suns (2nd nomination)

Comment: there's enough sourced information there that an article is feasible. And last I knew,  was a guideline, not a set in stone policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER)

Comment: to Linkin Park#A Thousand Suns (2008—present): It's not a big deal, but just for complete clarification,  is a well-respected essay based on multiple observations of prematurely-created stand-alone articles about albums that have not yet been released and lack enough information to warrant a stand-alone article.  (It was once proposed that it should become a fifth point of , but it was basically found to be rather redundant to existing guidelines.)  In this case, I wouldn't say that it applies 100%, but regardless of that this runs afoul of , which the nominator cited as well.  And as it says, "generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have ''all'' been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label."  There is basically one paragraph of verified information here and until the track listing is confirmed, information about this unreleased album should remain at the artist's article.  If anyone would like to continue developing the article, we could |incubate until the track listing is confirmed, as the nominator duly noted
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NALBUM||WP:AI)