Deletion of Hitchens's razor

Comment: Disagree that this is a pure ''repetition'' of Occam's razor. Occam's razor does not, in any way, discuss the "burden of proof" in relation to who is arguing for a claim, that is purely Hitchens' invention, and why this razor is named after him. With a quick google search, I was able to find several other RSes (mostly scholarly) which mention/discuss this concept independent of the references in the article and even largely indpendent of Hitchens himself: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/what-does-hitchens-razor-means-in-philosophy/article21827514.ece https://citizen.co.za/news/opinion/2444247/hitchenss-razor-and-the-case-of-malema-and-zumas-phantom-claims/ https://newrepublic.com/article/116251/best-arguments-gods-existence-dont-challenge-atheists https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2015-10-04-hitchenss-razor-amateur-sleuths-present-compelling-new-evidence-in-inge-lotz-case/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bdi.12953 https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105238 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc6311890/ https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar//handle/123456789/37523. ''The Hindu'', for example, discusses it in depth and helps establish . All these other uses of it independent of Hitchens as a person demonstrate it has independent notability as a turn-of-phrase and philosophical argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Christopher Hitchens or some other suitable target. I'm not convinced it meets GNG unless there are sources that pre-date the Wikipedia article (2012). The recent usage linked to above looks like itogenesis to me. Searching Google for "Hitchens's Razor" (or variations) prior to 2012 brings like almost no results and certainly none that are RS. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22hitchens%27s+razor%22&client=safari&hl=en-us&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A2012&tbm=. If you look at the first creation of the article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hitchens%27s_razor&oldid=521000235#cite_ref-3, the only reference supporting the existence of this is Hitchens's own 2007 book. These are tell-tale signs of citogenesis. We should fix this error before it gets worse
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)