Deletion of Lucifer and the Biscuit Hammer

Comment: fails  & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BK)

Comment: the summary and character list have been removed as they were copied from scanslation sites. While they may be illegal sites,  of their summaries does still apply (irony noted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: pretty much per nom.  This book is verifiable and has a lot of Ghits, but nothing can be found about it to show why it meets , which calls for multiple independant third-party sources discussing the book in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: No significant coverage in reliable sources, so fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: fails  and . No significant coverage in reliable sources, no extensive reviews. Licensed in China,http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/manga.php?id=10645 but no Chinese reviews found either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BK)

Comment: Fails ; GHITS don't quality
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)