Deletion of Out of position

Comment: Misguided deletion rationale.  is a deletion reason if and only if the article cannot be anything more than a dictionary definition ''ever''. If it can be improved from its DICDEF status by editing, then it is not a deletion rationale anymore. Now, the topic is notable per  and sources allow it to be easily expanded from DICDEF status, as a quick look in Google Books shows: http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=5av2_E39EQkC&pg=PA249&dq=OOP+++%28Out+Of+Position%29&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lcHBUN7tMo7ZsgaU44Bw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=OOP%20%20%20%28Out%20Of%20Position%29&f=false , http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=0FRGAAAAYAAJ&q=OOP+++%28Out+Of+Position%29&dq=OOP+++%28Out+Of+Position%29&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lcHBUN7tMo7ZsgaU44Bw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBA, http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=vSGyTBzHuUkC&pg=PA428&dq=OOP+++%28Out+Of+Position%29&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lcHBUN7tMo7ZsgaU44Bw&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=OOP%20%20%20%28Out%20Of%20Position%29&f=false, http://books.google.co.jp/books?id=De5LdqgeSf4C&pg=PA104&dq=%22out+of+position%22+crash&hl=en&sa=X&ei=X8LBUMzeBsmMtQaWsYHYBw&ved=0CDYQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22out%20of%20position%22%20crash&f=false. I recommend the nominator to apply  next time, as mandated by our deletion procedure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)