Deletion of Jenna Hutchins

Comment: global top 100 is nowhere near good enough to constitute "a notable level of the sport" per . Top 25, maybe. If Activist knew track and field well, s/he would have known that Olympic races (and hence the winning times) are often not full-paced. I think Wikipedia:Countering systemic bias doesn't apply here either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: per . USATF website |is reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: Setting a United States national junior record and North American continental record as a youth athlete is a rare and notable achievement on its own.  USA is not a small time player, there are a lot of notable athletes who were as much as three and a half years older who she bested.  Coverage by the major media players of the sport, FloTrack, Milesplit, Runners World, Track and Field News means .  World Athletics took note and https://worldathletics.org/athletes/united-states/jenna-hutchins-14877695 posted her profile.  As Geschichte downplayed the world top 100, he should have noticed that list is so lopsided, only some 14 countries are represented in that 100.  Lets also note her time would have placed 15th in the 2016 Olympic final.  While making it through the tough American talent pool would be quite a feat, particularly for a youth level athlete, she currently would be on that track in the U.S. Olympic Trials.   is definitely not applicable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:TOOSOON)