Deletion of Controversies surrounding Royal Dutch Shell

Comment: You are aware that we have mechanisms for a proposed merge beyond *fD, right? Is the nom actually calling for deletion? Also, doesn't half of the nom basically negate ? OR should be removed, but most of the article is well sourced. If you'd prefer they be so tightly focused in pursuit of GA status, then split the events into other articles (lord knows it's well past what's called for by , and always has been) and/or merge the strongly sourced points to the (already large) parent article. AfD seems like an odd place to bring this up
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT||WP:LENGTH)

Comment: per , , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:OR||WP:SOAP||WP:BATTLE)