Deletion of 2018 Vienna stabbing

Comment: An excellent case of : «On 13 March the Austrian Interior Minister Herbert Kickl announced that Austria will change its asylum policy because of this and other incidents».   reads «Events are often considered to be notable if they act as a precedent or catalyst for something else. This may include effects on the views and behaviors of society and legislation».  Also, the article clearly meets both WP:SIGCOV and WP:GEOSCOPE, with coverage cited in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom.  A clearer case for Keep is rarely seen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: per .  All murders are tragic, but not all are notable.  Just because this is vaguely tied to "Islamic terror" doesn't make it notable either.  I find it non-credible that this and 2018 Vienna embassy stabbing are both notable as a pretext for a minor policy change on asylum (the Freedom Party of Austria|FPÖ ''already'' opposed immigration, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: a week and a half later, the event is still tragic, but it fails  and doesn't seem to have any lasting impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I think the article now meets . Changing !vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: Need more information. Also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and , "rare for this country" is simply an opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING)