Deletion of Mandarin Chinese profanity

Comment: The article seems to have enough information (both on the expletives themselves and on Chinese culture) to pass , doesn't it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: this article is more than a mere dictionary definition of a few Chinese words. It contains encyclopedic information and is well referenced. I think  is designed more to prevent us having an article on every individual word, than to suggest that well researched, well referenced and fairly comprehensive articles about a genre of words should be deleted. There is probably room for improvement to this article, but that's not a reason to delete it either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICT)

Comment: Although I do understand where some "keep" arguments come from, I'm going to have to say delete per . Wikipedia is not a dictionary and this is about Chinese translations of assorted profanities and their short descriptions. Perhaps it could be cleaned up, but at its current state as a list this one is not worth keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I think it's pushing it to call this a violation of #DICTIONARY. It seems to me to be a valid article about a whole genre of words, with plenty of potential for more references to their usage in culture. Currently it does resemble a list of definitions in places, but there ''is'' more to the article and the future potential is good
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)