Deletion of Mayfield Mall

Comment: This is an article about a '''mall'''. How is a mall that becomes an office complex still a mall? It might be relevant to an article about mall reuse, but this is an article about Mayfield Mall, not an office complex. But in either case '''none''' of the sources in the article demonstrate notability for a mall or an office complex. They are just routine news articles. Nothing that supports  or : "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish. notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBUILD)

Comment: well sourced and well written article which meets our guideline for . The nomination mentions "extinct mall" but our relevant guideline refutes . Nomination also suggests lack of sources, but in the article I see Bloomberg News|Bloomberg, San Francisco Examiner, Mountain View Voice, BizJournals. It is also relevant and notable that the mall was rented and purchased by Google
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT||WP:NTEMP)