Deletion of Duhin Nanda

Comment: but I'm not for a speedy here unless we hit the  wall.  It really is too soon for this one.  Let's give some time and put him back later. Seems a smidge promotional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he's got better sourcing. There are plausible notability claims here, but there's nothing that's so "inherently" notable that it would entitle him to rest entirely on |primary sources instead of reliable ones — and no, the existence of one "alumni get jobs" article in the ''student'' newspaper of his own alma mater is not a notability clincher in and of itself either. The notability test for a person is not the things the article says, it's the depth and quality of the ''sources'' you can or can't use to ''support'' the things the article says
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: Poorly sourced and does not appear to meet . A search for sources yields video content featuring the subject of the article, but there is nothing substantive in  ''about'' him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)