Deletion of FFF (gang)

Comment: Rolling Stone'' magazine published a very extensive multi-paged exposé on this gang and its members (a heavily abridged, yet still multi-paged reprint of it can be found http://books.google.com/books?id=OxEquyvnUSwC&pg=PA89&lpg=PA89&dq=%22leader+of+the+pack%22+fff&source=bl&ots=l5bNoBgT2e&sig=GZtL2qodgL5JX9-G4naKspNQ5MU&hl=en&ei=CbOiSvSrL43gsQOt7_2MDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1#v=onepage&q=%22leader%20of%20the%20pack%22%20fff&f=fals here), thus easily passing .  That's why I created an article about it.  Additionally, the ''Los Angeles Times'' has published significant coverage on this topic http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/64491533.html?dids=64491533:64491533&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jul+28%2C+1985&author=DOUG+SMITH&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=White+Punks+a+New+Puzzle+in+Gang+Scene&pqatl=googlehttp://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/64504980.html?dids=64504980:64504980&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Aug+18%2C+1985&author=THOMAS+OMESTAD%3B+JOHN+NIELSEN&pub=Los+Angeles+Times+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=Two+Teen-Agers+Held+in+Killing+of+15-Year-Old&pqatl=google (despite the nom's claim that it lacks "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources", that 1st LA Times article was found in the link ''provided by the nom above in this AfD!'').  Being a unique Caucasian Los Angeles gang that has received significant coverage from very reliable sources is an assertion of notability.  A |reliable source can be published 23 years ago, 2 years ago or 230 years ago and still be a valid source per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS)