Deletion of Chili burger

Comment: I vehemently disagree with almost every aspect of this nomination for deletion and the subsequent comments made by the nominators. First off, the implication that the page creator is somehow obligated to expand the article is almost as ludicrous as it is offensive; Wikipedia is about collaboration, not about one person creating a page and immediately bringing it up to GA status. Deletion is not a mechanism for cleanup; see , , and , these problems are certainly surmountable. Additionally, remember that |there is no deadline. I am baffled by the nomination and highly doubt that the requirements of  were met. A quick Google News search turns up hundreds of reviews, and shows that chili burgers are the specialization of several restaurants that have opened up in places that are covered by a newspaper. That covers notability, there are no copyright violation issues, no one's disputing the content's factuality, so verifiability is not a concern, and it's not a BLP, so looking at the reasons for deletion shown -REASON|here, Wikipedia's deletion policy, I see no earthly reason for which this should be deleted. I will stipulate that it's not much of an article as is right now, but that's a reason for expansion and collaboration, not deletion. Deleting an article because it isn't very well-developed would be like kicking a first-grader out of primary school because he struggles adding and subtracting, ''these problems can be fixed''. Well, to summarize, keep the article and expand it, don't delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NEGLECT||WP:INVOLVE||WP:UGLY||WP:NORUSH||WP:BEFORE||WP:DEL)