Deletion of Kommissar Hjuler

Comment: This article is the best example I could ever dream up to explain why subjects should not write their articles about themselves.  The conflict of interest issues are so tightly woven through every paragraph that the article itself is not salvageable.  Literally every line would have to be rewritten.  The subject himself may very well be notable (my gut says he is) but the citations are so botched, so flooded with non-reliable sources, it makes the task impossible to perform.  This really needs to be userfied and rewritten by someone INDEPENDENT of the subject, but I'm refraining from !voting because this utobiography|autobiographical subject may be notable but a dreadful mess to verify
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: I am trying to help the subject of the article to get involved in the discussion. I have pointed out  (which is not directly relevant to this discussion, but must be addressed afterwards if the decision is "keep"), but he is very new to WP. Please take
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I am now convinced that the subject is definitely notable for an article. Some of the references are hard to deal with, but they will be dealt with. The article has improved considerably AFAICS, the  author (he didn't start the article, only modified it, probably a bit too much) is very open to doing everything to comply with WP policies and guidelines, but he is still ''very inexperienced''. Note that I did not decide to "save" the article, I only decided to help a newbie user with the harsh wind that sometimes blows across the WP waters. A lot of issues still remain; in the medium term, it is probably best if
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)