Deletion of ALINE Systems (2nd nomination)

Comment: weakly.  I cannot evaluate the sources cited in the article, and they appear in text rather than links; but their titles, at least, suggest that they support the proposition that this consumer business has received an adequate level of coverage in independent, third party media of specific-interest but voluntary readership (sports magazines).  That would appear to meet the |business notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: NPOV is not an argument for delete as it can be fixed through normal editing.  However, the article makes no assertion of notability and should therefore be deleted; even a well sourced topic is non-notable where it makes no argument for being other than run-of-the-mill.  See  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:EXIST)

Comment: replying to Bongomatic -  is not policy, but given that  would, read strictly, allow a separate page for every suburban restaurant able to source a Yellow Pages and a couple of local restaurant reviews, clearly there is a higher standard for notability than merely the existence of reliable, independent sources.  That standard must be that the sources themselves attest to the notability of the subject - which is not the case here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:N)