Deletion of Edward Foulkes

Comment: per ; "participated in a major international amateur ... competition at the highest level
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: Thought long and hard about this, but ultimately fails the notability guidelines and that concerns both WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. The keep supporters all make the logical fallacy that a sportsperson automatically is notable upon reaching a certain sportive achievement. That's not true. The achievement alone does not do that. It only creates a '''rebuttable presumption'''. As it happens here this darts player only qualified for the tournament through a specific qualifier designed to allow one young player from his country in the draw. He did win his first match, but his opponent was a rather insignificant player himself (ranked around #100 in the world). Foulkes subsequently lost comprehensively against the first significant player he faced. WP:SPORTCRIT clearly states that notability is dependent of the subject having been subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent and independent of the subject. That is what we call |significant coverage. Said coverage does not exist here and the keep supporters have not made any attempt to prove it does. The only existing coverage of this person fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: It passes  and the subject is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: as passes . Needs a few more references but the subject is without a doubt notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)