Deletion of Laura Moser

Comment: As Nom says, coverage of candidates for Congress does not constitute notability.  In this case, she is one of a sizeable group of Democrats already running to unseat an incumbent in 2018 in Texas's 7th District.   Not surprising that the same, infrequent editor who created Benjamin Moser would create this campaign promotion. She has published books, but I cannot find that they  - such as feature stories or book reviews.  Her bio of Bette Davis seems ot have drawn no attention beyond the routine pre-pub review in Publisher's Weekly, which establishes that a book was published.   Delete; sufficient sources not found to support notability.  And we don't keep candidate PROMO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Being a founder of an organization is not an automatic notability freebie on Wikipedia, if the |reliable source coverage ''about'' her ''in'' that role is lacking. There ''may'' be a valid claim of notability per  for her ''writing'', but this article isn't showing that — writers don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just because their books exist either, but must be the subject of reliable source coverage ''about'' their writing.Going over the sources here, we have: (1) a primary source "staff" profile on the website of an organization with which she's directly affiliated; (2) a directory entry which verifies the existence of her father but contains ''no'' content whatsoever about ''Laura''; (3) ''one'' acceptable source about her writing; (4) an unreliable source |blog; (5) self-written content about herself; (6) self-written content about herself; (7) an article about her husband which contains no mention of Laura at all; (8) a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article that isn't ''about'' her; (9) a paywalled article which ''may'' be an acceptable source but is impossible for me to |verify at all; (10) another piece of self-written content about herself; (11) a piece which verifies a completely tangential fact about her future election competitor while containing no mention of Moser at all; (12) a piece which verifies a completely tangential fact about the district where she's running while containing no mention of Moser at all.In other words, what we have here is ''not'' the quality or depth or breadth of sourcing that it takes to make her notable either as the founder of an organization or as a writer. So no prejudice against recreation in the future ''if'' her notability and sourceability beefs up, but nothing present here right now is enough to get her an article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BLOGS||WP:V)