Deletion of China's Famous Teas

Comment: This set off a dim alarm bell in that I saw the article ages ago and thought that something needed to be done with it - particularly given the |peacock term in the title. The Chinese term "中国十大名茶" is a widely known phenomenon so although there are no |notability issues there are still problems. The first one is that the closest English translation, i.e. "China's ten famous teas" is naff. The second problem is that opinions vary as to which ten teas are the top ones. My suggestion is that we move the topic to "List of the top ten Chinese teas" and decide on the criteria for inclusion on the talk page of the new article. Tea is a fundamental in Chinese culture and the people's obsession with fame and lists means that we would be mistaken to dismiss the topic out of hand
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK||WP:GNG)

Comment: The key here is that the topic (although perhaps not in its current wording) is |notable based on |significant coverage in |independendent |reliable sources. However, as Chinese Wikipedia says, there are multiple interpretations of what the ten top teas are. The China Internet Information Center's http://www.china.org.cn/top10/2011-07/05/content_22924156.htm Top 10 Chinese teas is arguably the official list as it is published by an offshot of Xinhua, the state news agency. Then there is the Agriculture Department of China 1959 list (already in the article), a list by Hong Kong's Hong Kong's Wen Wei Po daily published on January 18, 2002 and the Fox News http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/01/23/world-top-10-teas/ World's top 10 teas, although that includes one Indian tea
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:THIRDPARTY||WP:RS)