Deletion of One Piece terms

Comment: this is a part of a larger topic.  It wont fit on other pages.  Extremely notable series.  It doesn't seem to duplicatE much, which wouldn't be a reason for deletion anyways.  See , #PAPER.  It's probably the result of some the items receiving a result of merge on their own AfDs.  It it isn't, it soon will be if this is deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS||WP:NOT)

Comment: per  point 2, according to which: ''Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be merged with short descriptions into a "List of characters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: WP:NOT#PAPER, . Meets notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: No VALID reason for deletion was actualy given, what the entire nomination boils down to is: "This looks like |fancruft, and dispite the fact that that is not a reason for deletion, |I don't like it, so let's delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)