Deletion of Walter de Washington

Comment: Lacks  from . {{U|Tgec17}}, everyone's vote counts. Your changes have not changed anything viz notability, and the only person behaving in an inappropriate way here is you. See . Special:Contributions/174.212.222.105|174.212.222.105
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: There's an entry for the subject in ''Burke's Presidential Families of the United States of America'' by Hugh Massingberd and this contains dates and details such as the subject's wife.  Naturally, accounts of such an ancient knight are sketchy but, as there is clearly interest and documentation, deletion is not appropriate.  The worst case would be merger to Washington family,  Our policy  applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: clear delete because of ; no other assertion of notability; not even worth merging with Battle of Lewes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not genealogy, not even George Washington's genealogy. Notability is not hereditary, and I can see no serious argument that de Washington is notable independent of his relationship to the President. While I suppose one could argue for a merge and redirect to Washington family, it would still be  since there are zero references to de Washington in reliable (i.e. non-genealogical) sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:UNDUE)