Deletion of List of Coalition forces killed in Iraq in 2006 (3nd nomination)

Comment: per .  We use lists as a way of guiding readers to Wikipedia articles with something in common, not as a way of collecting bits and pieces of information from hundreds or thousands of newspaper articles.  There are lots and lots of |other wikis on the Web; anyone willing to collect and post this information elsewhere is welcome to do so.  But keeping this list at Wikipedia would be a very bad precedent:  List of U.S. state legislators in 2008; List of Chief Financial Officers of major corporations in 2007; List of restaurants reviewed by the ''New York Times'' in 2009; List of bills signed into law in 2005 by the Virginia state governor.  All of these would be totally supportable by reliable sources, and all of them would be clear violations of  - Wikipedia isn't a guide, and it isn't a place to collect bits of related information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OUT||WP:NOT)

Comment: undue recentism, developed-world bias, and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: I have nothing but the greatest respect for these people.  That said, I don't find it to be particularly appropriate to an encyclopedia.  It is more of a |memorial to those people that died that something with any informational value.  How about a list of names of everyone who has died of cancer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL)

Comment: per nom and most of those above. This is a true violation of , is insensitive and unencyclopedic. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)