Deletion of Brain vital signs

Comment: Fails . Lacks significant coverage in multiple indepenent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment:  compatible sources lacking
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: it's too much of |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Overemphasis on one research team, overemphasis on one research teams' primary studies, and promotional. I'm not seeing |secondary medical sources that we could summarize, otherwise the article could be saved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: There are a few bits of language that are puffery but those can be removed. The article cites both academic and popular sources that appear to support . I read  but don't see how it applies here: {{tq|a Wikipedia article that ostensibly discusses its nominal subject, but instead focuses on another subject entirely}} — the nominal subject is the framework, and that's what the article discusses. '''editing to add:''' I'll leave my previous comment, but I'm glad some editors with experience on medical articles showed up to comment; I defer to their expertise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COAT)