Deletion of Paul Robinett (3rd nomination)

Comment: The pieces of coverage identified above by Oakshade, and referenced in the article, are enough in my view to demonstrate that the subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Has significant coverage per  and  with coverage spanning many years and internationally no less.  Wired (magazine)|Wired, ''Der Spiegel'', ''The Wall Street Journal'', the ''Chicago Tribune'' and ''Berliner Zeitung'' are all extremely reliable sources per  and the coverage from all of these collectively are in-depth with some like the ''Wired'' article going into very significant coverage, more so than I've seen as acceptable coverage for other topics that were kept after AfD.http://www.wired.co.uk/article/youtube-community  The now not-available online article from ''Berliner Zeitung'' also goes very in-depth (can be found http://www.webcitation.org/6qAvZYRTY here in this archive after scrolling down). "They have a youtube channel" is not a proper AfD rationale.  I notice that last AfD which was closed as a decisive "Speedy Keep" was in May of this year.  Too early to AfD again
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RS)