Deletion of OtterBox

Comment: Company clearly meets the |GNG with its current sourcing, and it isn't quite as messy as I expected from reading the above. I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OtterBox&diff=598322233&oldid=597263184 gave it a little cleanup and it should be okay now. czar&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article is pretty clearly  (very weird to have a patents section, for example), but that doesn't take away from its notability necessarily. There's a decent number of hits on Google News, and it was named by Forbes as one of America's most promising companies http://www.forbes.com/companies/otterbox/ and some product reviews in major publications (e.g., http://www.thestar.com.my/Tech/Hardware/Mobile/2014/01/02/You-Otter-use-this/. I do share your strong distaste for the paid editing going on here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)