Deletion of Ramona Trinidad Iglesias-Jordan

Comment: Ping|White Eaglet|Fiskje88|930310|Inception2010}}  Please note that there is no such specific notability guideline for "oldest person," and any reliance on such a non-existent guideline or precedent is misplaced.  All such "oldest persons" must satisfy the general notability guidelines per , as well as other suitability guidelines such as , in order to have a stand-alone article on Wikipedia.   You are respectfully requested to provide links to what each you believe are the three best examples of ''significant'' coverage of the subject in independent, reliable sources per GNG, so other editors may evaluate whether such persons are notable.  Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: I |thought we've been through this before.  The oldest person ever is notable, period. |Consensus can change but not that fast
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CCC)

Comment: and '''redirect''' to List of the oldest verified people.  Nothing here justifies a stand-alone article. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: meets . http://articles.latimes.com/2004/may/31/local/me-ramona31 This source, for example, addresses the subject directly and in detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Agree with the user above. Coverage in sources, oldest person in the world... meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)