Deletion of Bo Guagua

Comment: the essential criteria to establish the notability of a person, per , is  is that "he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."  Bo Guagua is the primary subject of numerous feature and investigative articles, published in venues like the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Foreign Policy, the Daily Telegraph, etc.  Several articles predated the recent scandal around his father (more of this nature could be found). The other relevant issue from  is this caveat: "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A)."  Significant coverage can be found on Guagua—not for what his father has done, but for his own actions. This is my reading of the policy, at least
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Notability is not inherited. The interest in the subject is |solely the result of interest in his parents. Assertions as to the significance of the subject, and the sources supposedly evidencing this, are about princelings in general, and as such Bo Guagua enjoys mentions which could be considered 'trivial'.The article is more importantly a large possible  violation, and may violate : the material contained herein, even where sourced, is heavily reliant on gossip and speculation, and all that isn;t isn't of biographical merit; most of it is negative, has been denied
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP||WP:ATTACK)