Deletion of (14825) Fieber-Beyer

Comment: In terms of its representation in the scientific literature, this clearly fails . We do have two newspaper articles about its naming, but they're not really different from each other in what aspect of the subject they cover, and they're both very local. I don't think that's enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: yes, multiple independent sources on the asteroid naming in local papers due to press release, but no significant coverage.  It maybe , if the claims about future study come to fruition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: http://space.edu/mnews/newsitem.aspx?NewsId=1775 Multiple http://www.grandforksherald.com/content/und-researcher-honored-namesake-space-rock independent http://www.jamestownsun.com/content/jamestown-native-has-asteroid-her-name-it sources on the asteroid naming, which might be irrelevant for  but surely are relevant for . Add to this that there is a lightcurve, and thus evidence of academic interest, and we have a case for notability (That a lot of asteroids have light curves is irrelevant - notable does not mean unique
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO||WP:GNG)