Deletion of List of Warcraft humanoid races

Comment: the people who are voting to keep are doing so basically from  not for any valid reasons.  The nominator was dead on when citing policy reasons for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: an article containing cruft is not a valid reason for deletion, as |gamecruft shows. The nominator's assumption that the article will acquire |original research is not a valid reason for deletion.  The nominator's assumption that lack of sources means the topic is not |notable is not valid reason for deletion.  An article containing plot summaries is not a valid reason for deletion, as |plot summaries shows. #REASON does say that articles can be deleted if "All attempts to find reliable sources in which article information can be verified have failed", but   Subdolus has found several
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:PLOT||WP:DEL)

Comment: as these Stock characters have no |reliable sources to demonstrate |notability outside of the Warcraft canon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FICT)

Comment: Unencyclopedic" is not a valid argument. See . If a subject receives significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, which I have given, then it is notable and should have an entry. That the subject is related to gaming does not change this fact
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC)