Deletion of Jenna Fife

Comment: reluctantly. Wikipedia goes on |reliable sources, and unfortunately those reliable sources don't give much coverage to women's football- that's a problem with the coverage, and not with Wikipedia being biased. If people want to debate the guidelines, then that should be done at the appropriate venue, for example WT:NSPORTS or WT:FOOTY. However, we should be applying the guidelines at the moment, which say that she doesn't pass , and I don't believe she passes  either. I also don't agree with the logic of "she plays in a country's top league, and is therefore notable"- it's simply too broad
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm tired of the  and misogyny where we develop guidelines designed primarily by males to minimize the article for top female players compared to top male players. Plays in top division of football in Scotland
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: per |GNG and using |IAR for |NFOOTBALL. This isn't a matter of righting wrongs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IAR||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. The fundamental point here is that this player is someone, regardless of gender, who has played a mere handful of times for her club and only at junior level internationally. It seems from the article that she may well play senior international football at some point as she has already been part of a training squad, but that is some way off. The claims of GNG noted above are erroneous. All that has been provided in the article are |routine match reports which discuss team performance rather than the player specifically and other articles where the subject is only of tangential interest. For editors interested in what GNG-meeting sources look like with specific reference to a female footballer who does not meet NFOOTY, they need look no further than Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Havana Solaun|this AfD, closed only a few days ago which contains several references to dedicated, lengthy articles on the player in question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG||WP:MILL)

Comment: fails  and . Women's football is ''not'' in the same position as men's, it doesn't get the same level of media or popular coverage, and its "stars" are not notable (unfortunately
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Article needs expansion, not deletion per . The  essay is perpetually "incomplete" as noted at the top of the page and largely irrelevant to women's leagues around the world. SWPL is the top-division women's league in Scotland. Adequate references provided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:FPL)

Comment: as failing |GNG and |NFOOTY. The coverage referenced in the article and available online is more |routine than significant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: systemic bias is, as its name suggests, systemic. The SWPL is not a professional league, and otherwise there is not enough coverage for this to pass . It's not a problem of "misogyny"; Wikipedia treats players from both genders equally in that only players in fully professional leagues are kept regardless of gender, and Wikipedia cannot . SST
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS)

Comment: Top division of women's football in Scotland is not fully-professional, nor has she won a full international cap yet, so fails . Note to closer – playing in a top division is not sufficient to pass  – the league played in has to be fully-professional, so despite the incorrect claims above (which are disappointing to see despite the editor in question being fully aware of this),  is relevant here. Note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernestas Veliulis|these Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donal Greene (2nd nomination)|recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Kelechi|AfDs on male players who played in the top division in Lithuania, Ireland and Cambodia respectively, which are also not fully-professional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL)

Comment: When it comes to women's football (and women's sports in general), they receive woefully inadequate compensation and coverage compared to their male counterparts. Therefore, there is an inherent lack of fully-professional women's football leagues. Because of this, we have to |use common sense and not blindly follow . I have reviewed the whole of Fife's coverage and have come to the conclusion that she meets . —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)