Deletion of SCAA Family

Comment: No assertion of |notability (what are they known for?) and no |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: hardly surprising that we're here on AfD given that the article creator has not bothered to cite a single |intellectually independent, reliable source; some such sources (a few newspaper articles) seem to exist, but they're hard to find among all the youtube videos, blogs, and forum posts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This article has been Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron|tagged for rescue. The topic is encyclopedic, but it needs citations from |independent, reliable sources. Deleting this immediately promotes the ias|systematic bias of Wikipedia as being Euro-American biased; on the other hand, author of the article could be a bit more helpful in finding alternative citation sources - after all, wasn't Hong Kong under English control for about a century
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:B)

Comment: based on current content. The article is sourced only to the team's web site and a blog (which apparently is the team's official blog), meaning there are no independent, reliable sources. The article also focuses heavily on fictional content (such as the personalities, birthdays, and favorite foods of these fictional characters) with insufficient real world perspective per , other than promotional/advertising content relating to the merchandising of the characters. Nevertheless, I can imagine that the article could be improved to at least the quality of, say, The San Diego Chicken or Phillie Phanatic. But anyone who wants to keep this article should work on rewriting it to focus on real world context with independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)