Deletion of Ignatz Lichtenstein (2nd nomination)

Comment: passes most  tests, and is 'd by numerous 's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Sources that have been provided are perfectly in line with . No reason to delete. metaspheres
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: because he meets .  We are an encyclopedia that is not paper.  As such, we can keep all topics that other encyclopedias have chosen to cover.  Among the reliable sources about him that were mentioned in the prior AFD and the Deletion Review is the ''1929 Zsido Lexikon'', a Jewish Encyclopedia written in Hungarian.  Other reliable sources about him exist, so he meets , the relevant standard.  As an encyclopedia, it is arguably more important to cover historical figures than contemporary figures - and certainly articles on them are less often subject to spam concerns, so there are reasons for deleting contemporary figures that don't apply to historical figures
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)