Deletion of Protests of 2019

Comment: Should have been deleted under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: as zero evidence in RS of protests on large scale being related - listing all together is . Since this article has been recreated (it counts as a duplicate if it is using the same sources to convey the same information, no matter who wrote it), I would also suggest create-locking it at both titles and anything similar. List of protests in the 21st century exists, we don't even need a plainlist for this one specific year
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This is a  of several articles coalesced into one mass. Secondly, the treatment of these distinct protests as a single entity has no basis in RS (which at most provide a comparative analysis of distinct subjects) and is therefore . The article, thirdly, contains . It starts, for example, already at the very first sentence through linking a cited characteristic of the HK protests to a uncited claim about other protests
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK||WP:OR||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: None of the references discussed above is actually treating the various protests during 2019 as a single phenomenon or might have a contested existence. The BBC article is titled "Do today's global protests have anything in common?", the Guardian article discusses the differences and similarities between them, The Independent article discusses solely the HK protests. Nothing indicates that these are being treated by reliable sources as a single phenomenon with notability independent of the individual protests. Notability is not 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)