Deletion of Argusto Emfazie

Comment: with deep, deep regret.  It's a very badly-written article, but the subject, as a published, and apparrently reviewed author, does seem to meet the criteria of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per .  This does indeed appear to be a  that started here and spread like a virus.  I was unable to find information on any of the books supposedly authored by Emfazie.  See search results for http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2005-01,GGLD:en&q=%22eagle+blocking+sun%22 ''Eagle Blocking Sun'', http://www.google.com/search?as_q=+emfazie&num=100&hl=en&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2005-01%2CGGLD%3Aen&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=a+hand+of+clay+&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images ''A Hand of Clay'', and http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2005-01%2CGGLD%3Aen&as_qdr=all&q=+emfazie+%22the+remercie+por+grazie%22&btnG=Search ''The Remercie Por Grazie''.  Next, I tried to verify the single source provided, http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2005-01%2CGGLD%3Aen&as_qdr=all&q=%22jeremy+delomite%22 Jeremy Delomite of the http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=100&hl=en&rls=GGLD%2CGGLD%3A2005-01%2CGGLD%3Aen&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=doughton+review&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images ''Doughton Review''.  Apparently no such person or publication. Every single one of these search results, sometimes 90+ per search term, is a mirror of this Wikipedia article reprinted under the |GNU.  This article, which has been around since February 2002, is a perfect example of why  is so critically important. Great catch by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:HOAX||WP:GFDL||WP:V)