Deletion of Tom Scholes-Fogg

Comment: I was leaning towards Keep until I looked into the references, which appear to be mainly  - of the two book reviews, the one in Total Politics is a press release for the upcoming book and says, "I have co-edited a book," so the review is obviously by the author - the publisher, Queensferry, doesn't seem to exist (there is a Queen's Ferry Press, but different company) and the book was published through Smashwords, a self-publishing company - the other review link is to a Library Services blog and was written by a marketing firm, so may be a paid review - altogether, I couldn't find any "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" as required by  - the only thing that could save this article is if the founding of Emergency Services Day (United Kingdom) to educate the public about emergency services could be considered "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field" per , but it doesn't look like it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMBING||WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO)