Deletion of Atlantic International University (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm not so much concerned about whether this institution is accredited, as whether it meets . I've only found brief mentions such as http://www.galaxyreporter.com/2015/12/list-of-black-listed-universities-in-the-us.html this, so I don't think it does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: under criterion |G4 - The article was nominated twice for CSD and was declined incorrectly both times by {{u|Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant}}, a fairly new editor. The arguments he/she made for declining the CSD (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fouett%C3%A9_rond_de_jambe_en_tournant&diff=716577908&oldid=716574247 here, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fouett%C3%A9_rond_de_jambe_en_tournant&diff=716581961&oldid=716581113 here) were already made as part of the old AFD by a steady stream of canvassed editors or meatpuppets. It's a subversion of the deletion and consensus-building process. There's a reason behind CSD G4--it's called: let's not waste everyone's time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: under criterion |G4 - this diploma mill is no more notable than it was the last time it was up for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)