Deletion of List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation

Comment: per . This is an unencyclopedic cross-categorization analogous, as the nom notes, to lists such as List of people who have learned about geology, List of people who have learned French, etc., etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Yes, TM contains a lot pseudoscientific ideas and pseudoscience “research” to promote it, but that is not grounds for deleting it. Nor is it comparable to people who have watched a film because watching a film is not a way of life or religious or spiritual belief system. We have a list article for Scientologists: List_of_Scientologists. This list proposed for deletion is notable, per , so clearly the article should be kept. Given the controversy surrounding TM, undoubtedly this is going to attract a lot of LIKEIT AND DONTLIKEIT votes, but it comes down to , ,  and  which this article proposed for deletion seems to satisfy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:LIST||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: List of people who have seen Titanic is a bizarre straw man.  The list in question easily passes  because it's easy to find coverage of the numerous famous people who do this such as https://www.theguardian.com/film/2010/dec/13/david-lynch-post-traumatic-stress this or https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/transcendental-meditation-hollywood that.  There are obviously sensible |alternatives to deletion and, when taken with the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vegetarians (4th nomination)|similar attack on vegetarians, it seems rather tendentious
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:ATD)

Comment: I am persuaded by LuckyLouie's argument that this is effectively a testimonial and falls afoul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)