Deletion of Chicago (pool)

Comment: Meets , albeit on a weak level based upon sources that are ''available online''. However, the game dates to at least 1910, and it's likely that additional offline sources are available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Sandstein and WJBScribe. The "keep" arguments seem to boil down to |I've heard of it and think it's probably notable and that legitimate sources might be available, which is simply not enough. The initial closer was right to discount such "arguments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)