Deletion of Endosomatophilia

Comment: Short of actual, existing examples of secondary source citation, this seems to be a clear violation of #DICTIONARY
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: omd! It has a brief mention in 'wikifur'- that's clearly  and this should be given featured article status.:)  Not serious:)  For those who have contributed to this article- you might also like to contribute to a wiki started solely for fetish subjects here, http://en.smiki.org/Main_Page I expect there are some other ones online too.  They won't have the same rules for reliable sources, annd words used on messageboards etc might be more acceptable for an article to them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: unless |reliable sources are provided for |verification to expand this beyond a |dictionary definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:WINAD)