Deletion of Ryan kershaw

Comment: with no prejudice for relisting should the article author turn out to be a  or have a significant .  The article history indicates it was created less than half an hour before being proposed for deletion.  Subsequent edits appear to have added enough references (poorly formatted, admittedly) to support general notability. Come on, people, |don't bite the newbies.  I concur with the above comment that the page should be renamed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:BITE)

Comment: It Does meet  and Bands as this artist is still being played on the radio meeting criteria 11,  meets criteria 1 - Been published in reliable sources, newpapers and notable music websites such as the MMF website. Also criteria 9 and 10 -  has  won notable music awards with Battle of the Bands and won the "Mentoring for Success" by the Music Manager Forum and PPNZ this year
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSBIO)

Comment: Regrettably, I'm afraid that the references in the article aren't persuasive that this individual is notable, even by  criteria.  The http://www.mmf.co.nz/index.php/news-mainmenu-51/mmf-news/item/811-our-night-of-nights.html MMF Mentoring Success Award citation doesn't explain much about itself, so we can't tell the reasoning behind the award.  Was he mentored successfully?  Mentored others successfully?  Can't tell.  The http://www.libel.co.nz/tags/Ryan%20Kershaw Libel reference is a concert announcment, clearly not usable as a source for notability.  The http://easterncourier.realviewdigital.com/?iid=64481&startpage=page0000008#folio=8 Eastern Courier article might prove to be a RS if I could actually read the article, but since it's just a screen shot and can't be enlarged, it's usefullness is limited... but in this case, I'll give benefit of doubt.  The http://www.muzic.net.nz/artists/1171/ryan-kershaw Muzic.net link is not a reliable source as there's no evidence of nor is it commonly known to provide independent coverage nor fact checking.  While I believe the http://www.times.co.nz/arts-news/wenzlick-drums-up-a-win.html Times is a reliable source, this article barely mentions Kershaw and instead focuses primarily on his bandmate.  The rest of the references are tour announcements or passing coverage.  I don't see sufficient reliable sources indicating notability.  I believe this does not pass .  I see no evidence that the artist is in regular radio rotation or has achieved chart success in NZ or elsewhere.  For reference to this, I looked http://nztop40.co.nz/ here.  I'm sensitive to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: as does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSBIO)

Comment: completely fails ; sources are not independent (ryankershaw.com), I wouldn't call the articles from nzmusic.org "significant" coverage either. Finally, and this is not criteria for deletion, but rather for being moved, the article should be Ryan ''K''ershaw, not Ryan kershaw
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)