Deletion of Gringo

Comment: somewhat messy and poorly organized, but also |extremely well-referenced, obviously |notable concept (''not'' a |dictinary article on a word).  Past |outcomes for such concepts almost always results in a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:DICDEF||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: The section headings are a bit muddled and there are many 'Citation needed' tags, but |deletion is not for cleanup. This article discusses the social distribution and use of the word, the history of its usage, and its proposed etymology. Only the latter is dictionary content. Just as Wikipedia is not a dictionary, wikt:Wiktionary:What Wiktionary is not|Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)