Deletion of Stuck (unit)

Comment: Lots of sources.  No compliance with efore.  Article and sources is improved from what it was when nominated for AFD. The niff nawing about the reliability of the sources ignores the ''many'' books, publishers, and assorted sources that exist, including those mentioned above.  the sources mentioned by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: Articles must satisfy  and OTDICT. The obscure sources above are copies of each other with the same fundamental flaw as Cardarelli, namely a desire to have a bigger list than anyone else, so anything resembling a unit ends up being included
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: based on the nominators withdrawn nomination.  . Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE||WP:GNG)