Deletion of Leoni Wiring Systems Southeast (2nd nomination)

Comment: As per reasons of withdrawn Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leoni Wiring Systems Southeast|nomination 7 days ago, the provided references are independent and are coming from the secondary sources except for minor ownership claim in the infobox template of article. The "broken link" claim is partially false as there is a problem with website's repository. Until the resolution for this issue is done, the alternative reference was put giving the financial figures of the company and also gives clear indication of notability as it is one of 100 largest business enterprises in Serbia and one of 10 largest employers in Serbia. Therefore, "run-of-the-mill business with no indications of notability" claim by the nominator is false. More than two thirds of current references are in line with . The other third are references for financial figures, business ID or Tax ID. In my opinion, the whole nomination is full of incorrect and false persuasions which lack grounding in facts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: u|AirWolf}}, it appears that you are saying that Leoni is notable because it is one of the 100 laegest business enterprises in Serbia and one of the 10 largest employers in Serbia. If you can find a reference that is intellectually independent and states that Leoni is notable for that reason, please provide it here - otherwise it is just an opinion (yours?) that says "This is why Leoni is notable". Of the 10 references in the article, the first three are broken. Also, a common mistake many people make is by stating that the references are "independent" or "secondary sources". While this is sufficient for supporting facts and information within an article, this is not sufficient for establishing notability of a topic. Not only must sources be independent and secondary, but they must also provide independent content and not rely extensively on information produced/provided/published by the company. http://rs.n1info.com/a364542/Biznis/Leoni-gradi-fabriku-u-Kraljevu.html This N1info.com reference would fail as a reliable source since it has no accredited journalist/author - regardless, it is based on a company announcement and relies extensively on quotations from Klemens Sax, general manager for Serbia. It therefore fails both  and  and/or . http://www.privredni-imenik.com/Imenik/LEONI-WIRING-SYSTEMS-SOUTHEAST-59068 This reference is a bare-bones company listing and fails . http://www.dw.com/de/ausl%C3%A4ndische-investitionen-in-serbien-der-erste-spatenstich-als-staatsraison/a-40311065 This reference from dw.com is a mention-in-passing with no in-depth information and fails . https://www.blic.rs/vesti/ekonomija/pocela-izgradnja-druge-fabrike-kompanije-leoni-u-srbiji/n5vr4kn This blic.rs reference has no accredited journalist and fails  - regardless, the article was written in relation to Serbia's Minister of Finance and Economy opening a new Leoni factory and is based on a company announcement (and PR exercise), fails . https://www.blic.rs/vesti/ekonomija/vucic-leoni-postao-najveci-poslodavac-u-srbiji-nis-ce-u-2018-doziveti-bum/2jr9l2m This blic.rs reference is similarly an article written at the opening of a Leoni factory and is little more than a PR exercise and fails . Finally, http://rs.n1info.com/a110316/Biznis/Otvorena-fabrika-Leoni-u-Nisu.html this N1info reference is covering the exact same factory-opening ribbon-cutting PR exercise and also fails . Article must have intellectually independent content to meet the criteria for establishing notability and these articles fail on that single point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:RS||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)