Deletion of List of Other Backward Classes (2nd nomination)

Comment: The list passes , being based upon an official list maintained by an agency of the Indian government, and covered in other sources such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GulBDMgxcU0C Encyclopaedia of Backward Castes''.  It is comparable with equivalent pages which we maintain for other countries such as List of federally recognized tribes or List of ethnic groups in China.  To suggest that it is too difficult to do this for a major country like India seems to be special pleading.  Difficulties of size and nomenclature are quite common on Wikipedia and should be addressed by editing effort, not deletion, per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: No, maintainance is ''not'' a factor in keeping/deleting: |AfD is not meant for cleanup. Given that delete !votes recognize the topic is notable, they are reminded of our deletion policy, that requires that |what can be fixed by editing, is fixed by editing, not deletion. We have |no deadline to do this tomorrow, either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:ATD||WP:DEADLINE)