Deletion of Zhou Zhonghe

Comment: There are tons of independent and reliable sources that I found relatively easily. Appears http://sourcedb.cas.cn/sourcedb_ivpp_cas/yw/rckyw/200908/t20090811_2364084.html well-published, which fits  #1. Additionally (and as an independent factor), he's the Director of his institute (see previous source) which also fulfils #5 on the secondary Academics guideline. With both reliable sources demonstrated and notability demonstrated, this is easily a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: as above. Nom is advised to study rof before making further nominations in this area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per ... The article needs to better express the subject's notability, but there are over 1000 citations on the first 5 Google Scholar titles alone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: per the US National Academy membership and #C3. I've added Churn's source to the article, as well as a source for his discovery
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)