Deletion of Andy Cook (criminal)

Comment: According to , a convicted criminal is only suitable for a stand-alone article if "The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities" or "The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role". Neither of these criteria are met. Furthermore, according to , "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate. The assassins of major political leaders, such as Gavrilo Princip, fit into this category, as indicated by the large coverage of the event in reliable sources that devotes significant attention to the individual's role" - tens of thousands of people commit murder worldwide every year. There is no evidence this individual offender was exceptionally notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:1E)

Comment: focusing on whether a sock created this loses sight of |the fact that it's a crappy stub about |a marginally notable criminal
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:BARE)

Comment: unless some evidence is brought forward that the subject meets any criteria of . Reading through that notability guideline again, however, I am very not convinced he passes, and I also am unsure of any alternative content the biography could be merged into, except a quick mention at List of people executed in Georgia (U.S. state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)