Deletion of Adana derby (2nd nomination)

Comment: You people are ridiculous, is there a reason you are all so hell-bent on deleting this?. How many sources would you like? How many pictures would you like? Didn't even give me a chance to contest the previous deletion, I changed the article considerably, added a tons of sources and yet ''still'' no-one seems to like it. How many Turkish newspapers and magazines would you like? It got patrolled successfully ''twice'' with comment "nice article". And before anyone says none of these sources are credible: Hürriyet, Eurosport, FourFourTwo, Sabah (newspaper), Milliyet and TRT Haber all seem good sources to me. Not saying it's perfect, but certinly meets , for a start Googles searches for "Adana derbi" comes up with 515,000 results, "Adana derby": 372,000 results
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not the best article, but I took a quick look through it and it seems well sourced and satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRIVALRY)

Comment: As before, this still does not meet the |general notability guideline. While there is certainly more coverage, I would not categorise it as significant, since most of it is |routine coverage one would expect of a high level football match
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)