Deletion of List of churches in Greater Manchester

Comment: Even given that only |notable churches should have articles, and that non-notable churches should not be redlinked, this is nevertheless an obviously useful indexing page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I do not believe that this list is in any way in breach of the #DIR policy and, as Epbr123 pointed out above, it was created to remove clutter from Greater Manchester articles. If the consensus is to delete, then I'd request a reasonable time period to copy the relevant sections back into the relevant articles. But I do not agree with the argument that a list of churches (or schools) is the equivalent of a list of pizza parlours, on the basis that pizza parlours are commercial organisations, whereas churches are part of their local infrastructure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: in accordance with  and :Wikipedia:Lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (:WP:CLS)

Comment: Whilst I have repealed my nomination, I still think it worthwhile to mention that since there are no citations on the page and there is no content that has notable references, this list also violates 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: In #Wikipedia is not a directory| it states: Wikipedia is not the yellow pages.  A listing of places (like churches in my opinion) in a city would qualify as this.  Despite this, the argumentst presented by all above have persuaded me to |ignore this, and change to keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IAR)