Deletion of Differences between James Bond novels and films (2nd nomination)

Comment: The topic appears to fail . No significant coverage has been found using Google, or |reliable sources at all for that matter. While the subject itself is relatively interesting, it certainly is not a |notable article for a site like Wikipedia. In addition, the article is seemingly written as ancruft|fan |trivia, and looks like an |essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOTABLE||WP:F||WP:TRIVIA||WP:NOT)

Comment: This article fails the |GNG, and it also has too much |original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)

Comment: The contents should appear in particular articles on movies and/or books. The topic is interesting, but I don't think it's |notable in and of itself because the differences are usually treated in reliable sources according to each production, not topically as a single subject. Any generalities best belong at James Bond in film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . It's too unsupported and too full of  to stay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)

Comment: Comment''' This kind of material will be impossible to keep out of Wikipedia. Even if it's delete now, fans will just add it back, but in the actual movie articles, which would be unfortunate for a number of reasons. The better solution is to take  to this article and keep what few bits are reliably sourced. Every year or so re-visit and delete the unsourced cruft. It will keep cruft out of the main movie articles, and give space for fans to work on creating an article of this type using the best practices of reliable secondary sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)