Deletion of Blink dog (2nd nomination)

Comment: or '''merge''' to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: WP:GAMEGUIDE - Wikipedia is not a game guide and this has no notability outside of the game. Fails . I don't think  nor  apply as this cannot be improved. It already faithfully describes much of what the game guides tell us, but the problem is that this is not notable beyond that. There is no mythology of Blink dogs. There are no  that describe this information for taxonomies or cultural studies. There are no journal articles on the habits of a Blink Dog. The only relevance this has is to people playing a game. D&D players know all about Blink Dogs because it is in their monster manual, and nothing Wikipedia adds is going to help them at all. That is why this and all the rest of these need to go. They are out of scope for an encyclopaedia. They are in scope for a D&D wiki or the publisher of a D&D game guide. Wikipedia is not those things so can we just stop contesting these deletions and let them all go please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD||WP:RS)

Comment: If it's important that this creature was created for D&D, I've never heard of them once. They also appear to fail . Ergo, should be deleted as gamecruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Non-notable fictional monster.  The sources are either primary, trivial, or from non-reliable sources.  The previous AFD from a decade ago resulted in a "Keep" based on the argument that reliable sources ''probably'' exist, which, as it turns out, is not the case.  Fails the  by a fair margin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)