Deletion of The realm of possibility

Comment: no sources. looks like  to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The realm of possibility is not a new idea, or place for that matter.  The fact that everything I know about it is  is simply unfortunate.  I actually tried to do some research on it and couldn't find any . . . . which is why I thought it would be nice to have it here.  I'm sort of a spiritual guy and think of things in spiritual ways.  I'm aware of the use of '''spiritual objects''' in everyday life.  In a spiritual sense, The realm of possibility is as real as a Red Robin or Blue Whale.  One of the things that got me hooked on Wikipedia is the spiritual perspective that is written in some of the articles.  Sometimes when chasing a chain of related links you hit the exact thing you needed to understand something that might not been directly attached the orignal question.  Spiritual objects are real . . . to some of us.  Wikipedia should be everyone . . . . even the psychic, seer, nut case, or other one off type personalities in the world.  This isn't a case of  as much as it is I see, use, and thought others might find it to be useful.  I don't know who coined the phrase, I don't know where it came form, or how long we have been using it.  But I do know that it is a commonly accepted idea, term, phrase, and that it can be a very useful tool when brainstorming.  If it will help, I will try to make it more neutral and not so much a promotion of faith, personal power, or so '''usable.'''  However, I declare The realm of possibility to be as real as the nose on your face, (for those of you that have faces.)  I find articles like this to be useful as articles on Metallurgy.  Granted, most people think that spirituality is a matter of opinion, but there is consenous on many things.  Wikipedia can be a place we hash out and find common ground with terms that we all use, but perhaps don't agree on.  This is a real article. . . if badly written.  I would love to see people edit it, refine, and allow it to take its place on the things that we use.  This verifiable for the most part.  Granted, I don't think we have authorities on The realm of possibility but that is exists, or used in thought process is absolutely verifiable, just ask anybody
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:ILIKE)