Deletion of Murder of Charles Blankenship

Comment: Coverage by the Cincinnati Enquirer was continuous and supports inclusion in wikipedia. Per /CA ''As with other events, media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those regarding reliable sources. ''. There is nothing wrong with the Cincinnati Enquirer as a source. The fact that this maybe didn't make the national news is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: does not meet  per review of available sources; no lasting significance or societal impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: per . Doesn't meet . Sources only offer  |local coverage, and don't suggest that the event has any  effects. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NCRIME||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:LASTING)

Comment: because .  You get some sociological analysis in there, appearances in textbooks, etc. and I might take it out of the mere news category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: There are reasons to delete, as stated above,  and . There is no indication of lasting coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:NOTNEWS)