Deletion of Rashid Adewumi Aderinoye

Comment: The eubject fails  and . He lacks coverage in reliable secondary sources. A Google search of him only brings up papers written in his honor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Per {{u|Kaizenify}}, as subject meet atleast one criteria of  enough to meet our |inclusion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:BASIC)

Comment: This article clearly passed this |General Notability Guidelines, take a look at what the nomitor said, and see the reason behind the nomination, he stated "The article contains zero sources...." imagine! I don't know why some editors in Wikipedia are curious to nominate article for deletion, instead of sticking to the basics rules provided, before nominating an article for deletion, see whether the article have independent sources, so that it can be improve, and you are expected to do or leave it to some editors to do so, an article can not be completely sourced at once, it requires time, now how many references have you seen in the article? and per which deletion criteria are you suggesting the deletion? He/She quickly suggest deletion per no reference, now references are provided, what then? per which criteria again? time is still yours to strike your words
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)