Deletion of 南山 (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and #DICTIONARY... I am not sure if this is supposed to be an article about an oriental language character (南山), a dictionary definition of that character, or a disambiguation page about several different words that use the same non-english character when written in oriental languages.  If the first, then we need reliable sources (in English) that discuss it to show that it is notable.  If the second... that is not our job.  If the third, there are better ways to disambiguate the topics....  This seems to be written for specialist level Chinese and Korean readers... but our audience here on en.WP is the typical ''English'' speaker... who will neither look for nor understand these characters
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:UE||WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:POINTy nomination; nominator is currently in a deep and controversial discussion at  and other places regarding a similar issue. As for why this page should be keeped, I would like to give an example of how important non-English search terms might be on the English Wikipedia. Following the days immediately after Roh Moo-hyun's death, the 노무현 redirect got http://stats.grok.se/en/200905/%EB%85%B8%EB%AC%B4%ED%98%84 more than 1000 hits. Non-native English speakers may use foreign scripts to search for things, and I think '''TBROKE|don't fix what ain't broke'' applies here. We have many non-English redirects like these, and these redirects don't seem to be hurting anybody so far, and do have their beneficial uses (from what I'm aware of,  does not dictate what can and can't be done with ''redirects''). Now, in the case of 南山, what do we redirect to? Redirecting to Nanshan would clearly neglect Japan and be biased towards China; redirecting to Nanzan would give a similar problem. Is the answer to this really to delete this page? Or, should it be to not fix what isn't broken? The English Wikipedia does ''not have a sole audience of native English speakers'': as the largest Wikipedia project, many non-native English speakers also use this project, and cases such as 노무현 and 南山 are beneficial in that it helps people who use these search terms. Keep in mind that English is the global language, and if a native Japanese speaker can't find what he is searching for on the Japanese Wikipedia, he might go looking for it on the English Wikipedia next (but may not know the proper things to search for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:UE||WP:AIN||WP:UE)

Comment: to Nanshan. We don't have articles with non-Latin names, per , but redirects to suitable targets are fine. The target lists places in China called Nanshan and links to Namsan (disambiguation) for the Korean names
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:UE)

Comment: WP:ARTICLE|Disambiguation pages are not articles and therefore  does not apply. They are navigational aid, similar to redirects. Recently, we had another AFD discussion for a |Chinese-character disambiguaiton page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/松山 in January 2013 and kept the disambiguation page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:UE||WP:CJKV)

Comment: WP:AT and  both apply to articles. The page being discussed here is not an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:UE)