Deletion of Doug Bremner

Comment: per . The references at the article include significant coverage in one NYT article, and minor coverage in articles from NYT and CNN. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=%22Doug+Bremner%22&oq=%22Doug+Bremner%22&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.1195.5169.0.5448.20.15.1.2.0.0.396.1194.6j1j1j1.9.0...0.0...1ac.1.HvRm9n8MWYI#authuser=0&fp=d7325108e6be80da&gl=us&hl=en&q=%22Doug+Bremner%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 Google News provides other sources. The rest of the references in the article are more or less worthless, but he does appear to be a go-to guy for the media in the areas he writes about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Being an autobio is not a reason for deletion, at most a reason to rewrite an article in a neutral way, if necessary. Given Bremner's stature, the article is remarkably neutral. Let me just give some citation statistics from Web of Science: 238 publications listed, cited 14885 times, with an h-index of 65. Top 5 citation counts: 1290, 791, 731, 556, and 350. Just one of those is normally enough here for a "keep" decision. Article certainly needs cleanup and expansion, but Bremner passes  without any possible doubt. As a note to the nom, please read  and research nominations better before bringing them to AfD. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BEFORE)