Deletion of Primecoin (6th nomination)

Comment: edits made since my initial comment have made clear that this article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: In my review, only The Register refs (https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/07/16/digitalocean_primecoin_cloud_problems/ 1, https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/01/17/primecoin_malware_miner_discovered/ 2) and the Data Center Knowledge https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2013/12/17/currency-miners-cause-spot-shortages-dedicated-servers ref demonstrate  and are potentially reliable. True, these articles were spurred by events, and perhaps they would not have otherwise covered this alt-coin in such detail, but FWIW there appears to be three separate incidents covered - Digital Ocean spamming (June 2013), unprecedented cloud server buy-up (Dec 2013), and other malware-based mining (Jan 2014
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: as has substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources as identified above by Cunard, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: yet again per lack of . Citations are from 2013 and there's nothing more recent?  The Clark and Miller citations give only passing mention.  The Buterin citation is specific to the subject but it's also back from 2013 and in a niche publication.  One of the first considerations that new editors are asked to make before writing a new article is their ease in finding reliable sources. If a subject is notable enough for inclusion those sources should not be hard to find
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)