Deletion of The Controversy of Zion

Comment: per , , and . There doesn't appear to be any connection between the opinions in this article and the book of the same name. I believe these opinions are |unsourced and simply an expression of an editor's |personal views
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:CB||WP:RS||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: It's difficult to go through the normal process with an article that summarizes the Holocaust as "In ratio to their numbers they didn’t suffer any more or any less than other people, but this was an example of the phenomenon, that everything must focus on Jews." but I shall try.  It most likely violates  and either way, the book itself is not notable enough for this detailed a summary, so the article violates .  The statements in the article are not presented as arguments from the book, but as fact, which violates . To say it violates  is almost unneccessary for an article that puts the word anti-semitism in quotes every time it uses it. Furthermore, there is apparently a ''different'' book called '''The Controversy of Zion''' http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/0201562340/ref=dp_proddesc_0/002-1914302-3622456?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books amazon entry, which according to the reviews on the page appears to be a scholarly, even-handed account of the history of Zionism. (and therefore shouldn't even have to sit next to this book on a library shelf.)  Anyone read that book?  Let's replace this article with an article about that one!  Failing that, let's send this article into the dark pit of '''deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NPOV)