Deletion of DeLorean time machine

Comment: An iconic plot device that has itself been well covered in detail in multiple sources.http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22DeLorean+time+machine%22http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22DeLorean+time+machine%22  And though  and been spoken of earlier, '''THIS''' plot device, even if only because of the film, now has its own sourcable notability, and thus passes both GNG and . Per , cleanup is a reason to do so... and deletion is a last resort for the completely unsalvable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:ATD)

Comment: the notability is not inherited applies to ''main articles''. A set of articles with a main article and subarticles is considered a single article for notability purposes. You are misapplying . For further information, see '''Wikipedia:Manual of Style (summary style
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Mtiffany71, you are right. Notability is NOT inherited. See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: None of the article is |notable enough to be kept. This article is seriously |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: sure, the film itself is notable, but the fictional time travel machine used in the film is not. While the lack of references itself is not a valid reason for deletion, the availability of reliable sources are used to gauge whether the topic is notable or not. Editors who believe that notability is inherited are seriously misguided. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: No, I did not misapply . It clearly says "notability of a parent entity or topic does not always imply the notability of the subordinate entities". And Wikipedia:Manual of Style (summary style) has nothing to do with inherited notability. It only instructs editor when and how to spun off long articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: There are lots of sources for this, of course, as the prop is as iconic as the TARDIS or Starship Enterprise.  Some have an amusingly structuralist approach to the topic: "The DeLorean is presented as a masculine space... " (''The Worlds of Back to the Future: Critical Essays on the Films''); "...the DeLorean time machine the 'primary symbol of 'phallic' power'." (''Liquid metal: the science fiction film reader‎'').  The topic is therefore notable and should be retained in accordance with our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)