Deletion of David Hadrava

Comment: Given how comprehensively this article fails , this pretty clearly falls under the section in the leded of  which says ''Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article'' must ''be deleted; conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article'' must ''be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT)

Comment: one substitute appearances a number years ago (to ''technically'' meet ) is not enough when he comprehensively fails . Some  is needed here, and plenty of AFD precedent exists to say that barely passing NFOOTBALL is not enough when you fail GNG, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Otazu, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyacheslav Seletskiy, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandr Salimov, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrei Semenchuk, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artyom Dubovsky, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmos Munegabe, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marios Antoniades, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Sinclair (footballer born 1991), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fredrik Hesselberg-Meyer (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matheus Eccard, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Szabó (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metodija Stepanovski, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linas Klimavičius, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takumi Ogawa, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Fish (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrei Nițu, amongst others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: While ''technically'' meeting , the expectation that the player would build upon that notability in the ensuing 13 years has not been met. This player clearly fails . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails , as per previous consensus at AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . |NFOOTY lets us down here because that guideline is used to help evaluate whether or not a sportsperson is likely to meet the |general notability guideline, that it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the |inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. Plainly, it is not the case that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the |general notability guideline for a stand-alone article and it's not going to be the case. Since Mr Hadrava does not reach the level of our |general notability guideline, he is a relatively unknown figure and we should accede to his request for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: This is the second AfD I've come across recently for an article about a marginally notable person who has requested deletion, and the second time there's been a bunch of "keep per WP:NWHATEVER" comments. There's no reason to trap low-profile non-public figures in this kind of hidebound wikibureaucracy. Barely meeting an already low standard by a technicality is more or less  in any case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Player passes  as has  played in a |fully professional league, but per above, only once. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)