Deletion of Walter Sartory

Comment: This article piqued my interest, so I started digging a little to see if it could be saved. Per , notability can be established by "receiving a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level"; the IR-100 Award ''might'' qualify. Also, the opinions of his colleagues, as cited in the Drogin article, seem to indicate that he "made significant impact in his scholarly discipline, broadly construed", although this is unlikely to be verifiable in reliable sources for a while, since it is apparently classified. I think you can make a case to keep. I'll continue digging, as I have time, as long as the discussion is open
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: There is nothing here that supports notability.  Being paranoid, a millionaire, or murdered is not sufficient to show notability.  Coverage is focused on his murder, but that seems like . Special:Contributions/131.118.229.17|131.118.229.17
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Most of coverage appears to be regional centered around Boone County, Kentucky around the times of the murder and trial. In accordance with , I think notability needs to be demonstrated by coverage outside the local area spanning a longer period of time. ''The Los Angeles Times'' did give non-trivial coverage in 2010 (i.e. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jan/07/nation/la-na-scientist-murder7-2010jan07) as did ''The New Zealand Herald'' (i.e. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10619255) and ''The Independent'' (i.e. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-schizophrenic-genius-whose-worst-fears-came-true-1862415.html). Additional overseas coverage in ''The Telegraph'' (i.e. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6948816/Cleaning-lady-charged-over-death-of-maths-genius.html). ''Cincinnati Magazine'' would be local coverage, but it certainly devoted more attention to it than the average murder (i.e. http://books.google.com/books?id=04rg2xq8xJIC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA102#v=onepage&q&f=false
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: per .  If information is declassified in the future which makes his notability clearer, then of course we can restore the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Publishing pioneering papers on reactor design and medical centrifuges, which facts are supported by reliable secondary sources, not just primary sources, qualifies him under  even before his classified work is released
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)