Deletion of Maurice Kremer

Comment: I see 8 sources. Even if these are not in-depth, per  I think these sources combine to make the case for a person who is notable for what he did, which is the basic definition of notability, per the lead of Wikipedia:Notability (people). I mean, he was Treasurer of Los Angelos, that sounds notable to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: per , above discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: A tough 19th century figure to research, but I'm rather proud of my colleagues, having followed this article for a few months, and seeing multiple editors bring forward sources about this topic. The  are https://www.newspapers.com/clip/47973956/pioneer-follows-wife-to-the-great/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/47974440/double-affliction-los-angeles-daily/ http://www.jmaw.org/kremer-jewish-los-angeles/, and I'd also add http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/lac/112128_mkremer.pdf https://books.google.com/books?id=9wIlDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=maurice+kremer#v=snippet&q=maurice&f=false (pp. 16–19 and 21) and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/47974707/he-is-sturdy-at-eighty-los-angeles/ (though it's short
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)