Deletion of Hoon

Comment: There seems to be a misapprehension that  means Wikipedia may not have articles about words themselves. This is not the case. As long as the article is – or can be expanded to become – more than a mere dictionary definition (in this case, as long as the article says more than "''Hoon'' is an Australian word for 'pimp'", which it does), it is acceptable at Wikipedia. I would point out that we even have a Thou|featured article about a word
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: as this easily goes past a plain |dictionary definition
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)