Deletion of Carly Hill (2nd nomination)

Comment: I removed the tag because I read the relevant Wikipedia policies and thought that it did not qualify for speedy deletion via that criteria. Before I removed the tag, I wrote why I thought it didn't qualify for deletion at Talk:Carly_Hill#Contested deletion. The athlete is a two-time gold medalist at a global senior championship. There are at least twelve references from ten different independent secondary sources demonstrating non-routine coverage of the subject. That demonstrates substantial depth of coverage that far surpasses the  guidelines in my opinion, which overrules NSPORTS. The purpose of the NSPORTS guidelines is to supplement GNG and not to replace it (in fact the purpose is not to be authoritative in any sense as it is only an indicator of whether sources can be found), and I think that the athlete meets GNG. Also, I don't think it's very fair to say the tag was removed by "someone" without even mentioning my rationale for removing the tag (which is, again, on the talk page) when you could have pinged me by my username
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: per all of the above. It might be worth considering to |salt the article given how quickly it was recreated with the exact same content that got it deleted in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: She doesn't meet the notability criteria for hockey players and I don't believe the coverage is sufficient to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSPERSON||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: NN hockey player, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the GNG beyond routine sports coverage explicitly debarred by  as contributing towards notability.  For my part, I am at a serious loss to figure out how any editor can look at "she won gold medals at two of the World University Games" and claim that such represented a "global senior championship" (let alone one recognized by NHOCKEY), or to have genuinely looked at those sources and claim that they provide significant, reliable, independent coverage to the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)