Deletion of Brit-Am

Comment: per nom. Even if this was to meet our notability requirements (which I don't think it does) then the article should be started from scratch using multiple , after this one has been deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: No significant coverage in third party sources, systematic |POV and |COI issues. If |eligible sources are eventually located, this would need to be completely rewritten
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:COI||WP:RS)

Comment: no third party sources means otability not established. Sole reliance on  sources is against that policy. Use of bare ISBN of (apparently self-published) books is especially problematical, as these ISBNs do not appear to be listed in WorldCat & similar, to render details (or even existence) of these books verifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SELFPUB)