Deletion of Mayoralty of Sarah Palin

Comment: Hobartimus's comment explains the reason to keep it -- as per , linked by Scjessey.  The media have paid considerable attention to the history of one person's mayoralty of a small town.  As a result, we can reasonably assume considerable reader interest, and we have abundant  information on the topic, far more than for most comparable subjects
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS||WP:RS)

Comment: a necessary daughter article of Sarah Palin that is consistent with |summary style. This would be comparable (from a parent/child standpoint) with Illinois Senate career of Barack Obama
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: Wikipedia isn't set up to provide single articles that are the equivalent of book-length bios of prominent persons.  Nevertheless, by the magic of wikilinking, Wikipedia ''is'' set up to provide an overview of the person's life, with daughter articles that give in-depth information on specific subtopics.  Under , we can provide the equivalent of in-depth biographies, only structured so that readers who don't want to read the whole biography can readily find the specific parts they want
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: Whether or not a sub-article is warranted in this instance is not grounds for deletion, per #REASON. Discussions and suggestions regarding whether this material is better in the main article or as a sub-page are entirely content questions and therefore best discussed on the article's talk page. There is no question that the topic is eminently |notable, having received widespread media coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:N)

Comment: WP:N|notable? yes. Supported by |reliable sources? yes. Threshold for keeping article has been met. Merge and redirect would be the alternative, but I don't see any reason for that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I understand the points above, but if she wasn't the GOP VP, then this article wouldn't exist.  The other two examples WOULD exist.  Also, you can't compare an article about the governer of NY, the third largest state, or NYC, the largest city in the USA, with an article about a town of about 7,000 people.  The main points can be made in the primary article about Sarah Palin.  Anything else is either bound to be a POV fork, or a |coatrack.  I don't see any other articles about being the mayor of a town of less than 10k people on Wikipedia, so the premise is flawed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)