Deletion of Sheepskin boots

Comment: please read Ugg Boots history they have been manfactured as ugg boots since the 1930's the history as written in Sheepskin boots is purposefully being written to conform with the history according to Deckers as being presented in a US court case. I add the history of Ugg boots and renamed the section, but the purpose of this AFD is to have that |history washing deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: article is a  created to rewrite the history of Ugg boots, to reflect the desired outcome of a http://www.shoefaironline.com.au/blog/The-battle-of-the-uggs current US court case noting that this article history section significantly deviates and ommits information that is in Ugg_boots#History
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: subject to the status of the original article, Ugg boots. I am concerned that to keep this article is to allow a nomination to delete Ugg boots, and so I vote Keep on the sole condition that the original article is retained. I believe Sheepskin boots is a valid  from it, rather than a FORK. As usual, it is pointless to argue the intentions of the article creator, mostly because there is never any firm evidence of it, but also because the article subject is either valid or invalid whatever the reasons for creating it (and is valid in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: The nomination was based on '''http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sheepskin_boots&oldid=422704179 this version''' which at the time was valid #A10 candidate but because of the nature of the subject I knew that such a deletion would be disputed hence the AFD, while your assessment is based on the current article that doesnt warrant an assessment of the nomination as a miss use of  which clearly the article was at the time of the nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: to Ugg boots as a 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)