Deletion of Thomas P. Dooley

Comment: Passes #C1 with a h-index of 25, by my count (and filtering out the people who are not him). He may also pass other  criteria. The article needs a serious cleanup, of course. -- Special:Contributions/120.23.39.0|120.23.39.0
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: The self-published books obviously don't count. He has a respectable h-index, but in a very high-citation field, and not all of his well-cited papers list him as corresponding author. It's not clear what an "endowed chair" at the Southern Research Institute really means - they do competitive research in some areas, and he's published with their affiliation, but they describe themselves as a nonprofit university-affiliated CRO and a quick look around their website didn't turn up any mention of endowed chairs. Neither of the two companies mentioned seem to have attracted any coverage whatsoever beyond directory listings. His current company is just a compounding pharmacy. (Irrelevantly, "PanX" as a treatment for panic sounds like a Futurama product, not a real pharmaceutical. And it's hardly groundbreaking innovation: http://panx.us/tps-info.pdf.) In all, he might squeak over the  line, but lack of independent coverage of any of his diverse range of activities plus the promotionalism makes me lean toward deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)