Deletion of Prince François, Count of Clermont

Comment: There are reliable sources out there: http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10B14FE3C5D11738FDDAC0894DB405B818AF1D3 The New York Times, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/72166743.html?dids=72166743:72166743&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jul+15%2C+1993&author=Barry+James&pub=The+Washington+Post+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&desc=Antiques%3B+Battle+Royale%3B+Do+the+Queen's+Jewels+Belong+to+Papa%3F+Sotheby's+Is+Left+Wishing+It+Were+So&pqatl=google Washington Post, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/24608634.html?dids=24608634:24608634&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+06%2C+1987&author=Steve+Holland%2C+United+Press+International&pub=Chicago+Tribune+(pre-1997+Fulltext)&desc=FRENCH+PRETENDER+HENRI+D'ORLEANS+SAYS+HE'S+THE+TRUE+KING+OF+FRANCE%2C+BUT+AT+PRESENT+HIS+FLOCK+COUNTS+180.&pqatl=google Chicago Tribune, and the http://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/MH/lib00246,0EB35BCDA23A272B.html Miami Herald. He's a verified member of the French Royal Family. The article should be |cleaned up, not deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: if consensus is to keep this article, and I'm not convinced that being in a member of a lineage that has not held the crown in 150 year is notable, I would like to point out that it remains an unsourced , with the links mentioned above behind pay walls. So if not deleted or redirected, it should be Wikipedia:Userfication|userfied or sent to Wikipedia:Article Incubator|the incubator until it is properly sourced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)