Deletion of Mark Boerebach (2nd nomination)

Comment: So basically what you're saying is that, even though this guys easily meets the |general notability guideline and is notable per Wikipedia's definition of notability (ie significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources, and for more than one event), because you think there are other more notable game show contestants and because the subject wants an article on himself, we should ignore Wikipedia's guidelines and delete the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Please see the sources in the article and the ones that were mentioned in the Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 March 3|DRV for this article. He has received significant coverage from many independent, reliable sources. Although the majority of the coverage is related to Rockwiz, not all of it is. He clearly has the coverage to pass the |general notability guideline and has also received coverage for more than one event, so  (I think that's what the delete votes were claiming) does not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I can't find any |reliable sources which would back the claims of notability outside of the Rockwiz stuff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: So he finally received national recognition through Rockwiz?  We have a well-sourced article on a blind savant, a victim of Asbergers, whose deeds have been reported in multiple reliable sources. Sourcing appears to meet , and the many articles about the man and his accomplishments show his being worthy enough of note for Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)