Deletion of Denialism

Comment: per .  There are tons of google hits out there but they're all (as far as I could find) examples of use, not discussion of use as is required by .  In other words, OR.  Furthermore, as the nominator points out, this is a term that doesn't refer to a specific group or philosophy but is rather a way of deriding someone else's opinion, so the article doesn't seem accurate either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NEO)

Comment: Just at a glance my main concern would be that I don't see much in the way of reliable sources for this article. Keep in mind that blogs don't normally count as "reliable publishers".  Ultimately, the article has to provide some references to reliable publishers as described in  in order to verify that the term isn't simply a neologism and that the information in the article about the term isn't original research and is also accurate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)