Deletion of Wanderful Media (2nd nomination)

Comment: and possibly salt. This company has simply not received the necessary |independent reliable coverage to pass . And its brand, Find&Save, does not pass  based on searching. I did go back and look at some of the previous versions, since there have been significant deletions since the article was created, but the deleted material does not affect notability. (BTW the article really doesn't read like an advertisement; in fact it hardly reads like anything at all.) I did find out one thing: I now know (based on a Google search) what the company does. It reproduces local advertising circulars online; here is the page for my locality http://sandiego.findnsave.com/. However, it does not appear to have attracted much in the way of independent notice, and without such notice it does not qualify for an article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: and '''|salt''' - to start with, I'll try to address some of the concerns raised above. 1. this is not |speedy deletion, it's |Articles for Deletion so you should probably read up on that before commenting further. Similarity toi previous version is irrelevant. 2. We need reliable independent coverage. For what might be considered "reliable", please see . |Routine business announcements are rarely considered significant coverage. 3. That's great but it doesn't really impact on anything here. If the tone of the article is |promotional, that's a bigger problem. 4. Good, but it doesn't resolve the |notability issues. 5. The content and style might adhere to  but the subject itself still needs to be |notable to be included. That's the issue here. 6? Nobody has been blocked (from what I can tell) but the article has been deleted in the past and you really need to demonstrate why |consensus might have changed. Really, you should have gone to  before ignoring the community and recreating your article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:SPEEDY||WP:AFD||WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:PROMO||WP:N||WP:MOS||WP:N||WP:CCC||WP:DRV)

Comment: The fact that the notable companies mentioned have put in what must really be peanuts these days in terms of corporate investment into a venture doesn't in any way mean that the venture itself is notable. There are a lot of businesses that don't pass  despite being much bigger than this one appears to be. Find&Save seems to be a web-based lister of local 'deals', and I quote: "Our high level goal is to create an immersive and local shopping experience," said Dave Thomsen, Wanderful's executive vice president of product and design." That is from the fiercemobile site - I have removed the advert that seems to attach itself to text copied from there, and am wondering how they do it. (I wonder if he talks like that all the time...) In time, this may become notable. It may be the brand that gets notable before the company, as is often the case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)