Deletion of Kate Garbers

Comment: I cleaned up the article, added reliable sources about the subject, who has received multiple awards. She appears to be often sought out as an expert by the media on modern slavery and human trafficking, which is why the subject is quoted a lot, and not in passing. ''Reuters'' news service alone has quoted the subject seven times, https://www.reuters.com/search/news?blob=kate+garbers as evidenced here. The subject has received numerous awards, including a UK national award for fighting modern slavery. As such, she was named as one of the 100 most influential women in the west of England, the http://www.charitytimes.com/ct/social-change-awards-winners-announced.php Social Change Award here with an Influencer Award for her efforts in combatting slavery. In 2018, Amnesty International https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/six-incredible-women-changing-britain-12145946 recognized the subject here as one of six women for her work campaigning against modern injustices. The subject also worked with Parliament and contributed to the UK's 2015 Modern Slavery Act. The article now reflects all of the above, including reliable sources. It now meets notability guidelines and easily passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: does not meet ; coverage is in passing, not independent of the subject's company, and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:SPIP)

Comment: The awards, the quotes from her in national sources, and the profiles of her in the references for the awards (including the national Mirror) add up to meeting . The article does not state that she is notable because she has given a TEDx talk, it states that she is notable for "work combatting human trafficking, including contributing to the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and the National Referral Mechanism Review". That is buried in the Awards section, and should be included in the lead para as well, as it is a concrete example of how she assists and advises government ... I would suggest including the Influencer Award in the intro para too, but definitely the contribution to the act and the review. (I don't think "total spammy garbage" is a valid basis for arguing for deletion - in fact, it sounds like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:USELESS)