Deletion of Michael A. Jackson (sheriff)

Comment: unless "Jackson is also the President of the Maryland Sheriff's Association" is an assertion of notability the article fails the notability criteria. Simply being an elected official doesn't make you notable (you still need to be a notable elected official). The person fails , , , and probably a few more I'm not fully aware of yet. The article doesn't appear to have been improved in establishing notability or reliable 3rd party sourcing for said notability and simply pointing someone to the history doesn't equate to debating or establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I've added notability to the subject and his jurisdiction. Hopefully this satisfies , , and ! Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BIO)

Comment: Interesting. A sheriff in the US is often the senior law enforcement officer and often the most powerful single elected official in a county. We probably need to modify/create a guideline  for sheriffs. In Duval County, Florida, the JSO provides police services for 3/4 of a million people. In Pinellas County, the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office|PCSO provides services to nearly a million people. In smaller or less populous areas, the sheriff's office ''is'' the law enforcement agency. The holder of such an important office should probably be notable. At any rate, while the subject does not meet , it might be an example of to keep this anyway. Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:IAR)

Comment: Most of the references in the article are just about the county, the stadium, the harbor, or whatever, or are mere directory listings. Sheriffs are not inherently notable like state legislators. I see him mentioned in 2 articles whic are reliable and independent sources. Seems too weak to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)