Deletion of Clear Books (2nd nomination)

Comment: per {{section link||G4}}/#G11|G11/#A7|A7 (pick any): multiple times deleted article with nothing indicating |long term impact on history of humanity or at least basic |notability. The references in the article do the good job of proving that this company shouldn't have an article: (1) a promotional in tone review of ''company's product'' from a organization earning on serving indiscriminate collection of bookkeeping resources, (2) blog, (3) blog, (4) an article with side mention of the company, (5) list entry and (6) directory item: nothing usable for  purposes, needless to say about . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:CSD||WP:B2B||WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:notability)

Comment: Press releases and notices in small-audience trade publications do not create |encyclopedic significance for this, |one of many accounting packages.  Nor do publicity ploys like offering it free to legislators.  Web searches are hard because of the common names, but "clear books" + accounting software leads to no reliable sources in Google News.https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Clear+Books%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&safe=off&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Clear+Books%22+accounting+software&pbx=1&oq=%22Clear+Books%22+accounting+software&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=27075l31464l0l31550l22l21l1l0l0l0l226l3246l0.19.1l21l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=ca8ff369bd027693&biw=1680&bih=875
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIN||WP:MILL)