Deletion of Relode LLC

Comment: The references in the article fail the criteria for establishing notability. Some references such as the ones in The Tennessean might appear to meet the criteria but are, in fact, based on company announcements of funding, fails . Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Any company can get its name into papers. However,  and  require significant, independent, multiple, reliable, secondary sources. Crunchbase profiles, regurgitated press releases, and staff interviews in local press just aren't enough for this organisation to have an article ''yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: since sources already provided, such as ''The Tennessean'', ''Nashville Post'', ''The Bismarck Tribune'', etc, are enough for subject to meet . This is a start up that's past the  hurdle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as a  failure. Coverage of the topic is lacking the nessesary depth () to establish the subject's encyclopedic notability, and per HighKing's point above several of the regional sources cited are based on  information. In addition, the tone of some of the cited sources (like ''Could “eBay meets recruiting” fix healthcare recruiting?'' and ''Recruiting company aims to help find nurses'') is clearly speculative and thus inappropriate for an encyclopedia, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:PRIMARY||WP:CRYSTAL)