Deletion of Honeysuckle Gelato

Comment: at worst this would be a merge and redirect to Ponce City Market per . In addition to the extensive coverage in the ''Atlanta Magazine'' article noted above there is also lots of coverage from the Atlanta Journal Constitution, recognition as an important local food purveyor from the University of Georgia, and coverage in other Atlanta area news sources. I deem it enough to make this special company with distinctive products notable per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: a minor establishment of local and passing interest only. Fails  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Well, it cannot decisively meet . And does not have a Wikipedia administrator as a frequent and cherished customer. But it runs up quite a few mentions in the media. And it's not |too soon. And it's a business that contributes to the Atlanta Community Food Bank. So, weak knees
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Local company that fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: None, zero, not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. {{u|FloridaArmy}} says there is "extensive coverage" in the Atlanta Magazine but completely fails to say that none of the coverage could be considered intellectually independent since it consists of interviews and quotations or small mentions-in-passing, therefore fails  and/or . Perhaps FloridaArmy, who !votes a lot at AfD could point out some of the "extensive coverage" that would be considered to meet the criteria for establishing notability? FloridaArmy also conveniently forgets to point out that the Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) articles are blog posts, thereby fails  as blog posts are not considered as reliable sources. We really need contributors who !vote regularly at AfD to provide !votes based on policies and guidelines especially if their !votes are based on the quality of sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS)