Deletion of McCain-Lieberman Party

Comment: This is clearly |original research. Brooks was criticizing the concept as a workable political party - he wasn't "solidifying the term". The Note and the ''Hartford Courant'' articles are reporting on the Brooks AYou're jumping the gun here - as others have pointed out, Wikipedia is not a rumor site. An article such as this could lead some people to believe that such a party does in fact exist, when it clearly does not.  Please consider the suggestion to keep it as a draft in your own user space, at least for now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: as neologism.  Comment to Onemandband: Unfortunately, this term is very new - only |verifiably (that is, not used exclusively in blogs) five days old to my knowledge and research.  That makes it a neologism, something that Wikipedia does |not allow.  If the phrase stays around for a while, however, it may become notable and deserve its own article.  However, there's no way to tell right now whether this term will even live out the month.  The important question to ask is: Will this be remembered in 25, 50, or 100 years?  If this phrase is only around for a few months, it certainly won't be remembered, and thus does not merit an article in the encyclopedia.  Thank you for your enthusiasm, though, and feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you ever need any assistance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT)