Deletion of Bob Muran

Comment: searching fails to find reliable, third-party, published sources. Notability not established per  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: While this man may have an impressive sounding (to some) client list, the absense of |verifiable, |reliable, sources writing about  him is the issue at hand.  As far as I can tell subject fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Let me spell it out for you: 1. Permission to use the website content is irrelevant to this discussion - it will not help establish notability, because it is not "independent of the subject"; 2. Even if Discovery channel is a reliable source per , one mention there and another on OMNI Television do not meet Wikipedia:Bio#Basic criteria|the basic criteria for notability in the guideline for biographies, nor the general notability guideline in  - "received '''significant coverage''' in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (my emphasis).&nbsp;–&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: This Afd is not about the copyvio, it's about the |notability of the subject. The addition of the material from the website will not help with that. In any event, please post a link to the OTRS resolution.&nbsp;–&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Of course there are, but not as a direct copy and paste, especially by an editor with a huge |conflict of interest. But let's get back to the key issue here and that's notability. I think we each know the other's view on that so we will have to await the onsensus|consensus of the rest of the community here.&nbsp;–&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:C)

Comment: There are no verifiable sources; the website is irrelevant to the AfD discussion since it would not add a reliable source (per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)