Deletion of Miguel Figueroa

Comment: There is way too much unsourced talk about infighting between members within this political party and other communist parties and it is repeated elsewhere(see George Hewison, William Kashtan). So much of it sounds like  that I would worry about . Maybe these guys really don't care about airing their dirty laundry but I seriously wonder if this isn't some Wikipedia:COATRACK to discredit them and their parties
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPGOSSIP||WP:LIBEL)

Comment: Leader of the Communist party of Canada. One of the historically most important minor parties.  I accept that the leader of a subnational unit of a party is possibly not notable if that's the major accomplishment, but this ia  a national leadership.  The sourcing is adequate.  And there is no " requirement that biographies of living persons need to be sourced to the hilt or get canned; there is no "somebody might improve it someday" exemption for BLPs anymore" , There is a requirement that BLPs have a RS, which I interpret as a sufficiently RS to provide WP:V for at least some of the key claims .  Such is present, and whether we think it sufficient for notability is a matter of our own judgment. The question of notability is whatever we decide here. Bearcat, provide some evidence for your statement please--I cannot find the phrase "sourced to the hilt" on any WP policy page, or anywhere in WP except your own repeated unsourced assertions at AfDs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people (WP:BLPPROD)