Deletion of Easy projects

Comment: since I'm not sure that the sources have been parsed carefully. There are bad sources there, but there's also the gigaom, the BNET article, and a cursory search also came up with http://www.techvibes.com/blog/canadas-logic-software-launches-birdview-to-help-project-managers-track-progress-2012-07-23 this TechVibes piece. It just needs a little more work, but it almost certainly meets . Per : ''It has always been good practice to try to find and cite supporting sources yourself''. This isn't BLP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:BURDEN)

Comment: This is just a re-list of an article that has been previously deleted in the past a number of times, under the name Easy Projects .NET. Previous nominations all resulted in deletion citing lack of notability as per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT)

Comment: An article that has been deleted for lack of notability does not preclude the creation of another page about the same topic if the current sources are relevant and notable. I haven't studied this software in depth but just going through  I see that simply saying " "non notable" and "unreferenced" is not a valid criteria for deletion." I went through the resources suggested by   and Easy Projects comes up in several books (via https://www.google.com/search?q=easyprojects.net&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Google Books) like "http://books.google.com/books?id=dgGXr7HvOIoC&pg=PA104&lpg=PA104&dq=easyprojects.net&source=bl&ots=hY4PaW5rWD&sig=htMSsT6-iKFbJ8G8NvmR0X_cXXY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QOgaUMGyKojb6wHFgoDYCQ&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAQ 42 Rules for Successful Collaboration" , "http://books.google.com/books?id=TkDwzBcL0yYC&pg=PA174&lpg=PA174&dq=easyprojects.net&source=bl&ots=Ji-4UNttqi&sig=ZmhBw_PQL3oxIQClVxW3HEXLjuU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QOgaUMGyKojb6wHFgoDYCQ&ved=0CEoQ6AEwAw Managing for Dummies" , and "http://books.google.com/books?id=-qVYuahrT28C&pg=PA280&lpg=PA280&dq=easyprojects.net&source=bl&ots=FXbNptEBZG&sig=-Nl4ei75Vfm68F7whjUCJJkW88U&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QOgaUMGyKojb6wHFgoDYCQ&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBA The Complete Guide to Project Management for New Managers and Manager Assistants" , as well as a http://books.google.com/books?id=Sq_kXfAHB_MC&pg=PA26&lpg=PA26&dq=easyprojects.net&source=bl&ots=GNc0W1cjSs&sig=zFJwduIXvWY10d04xOSiJJwjVyI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QOgaUMGyKojb6wHFgoDYCQ&ved=0CEYQ6AEwAg review published by the FBI showing that they are using this product for one of their units and planning to adopt it for another one. Additionally, Easy Projects comes up in 16 results from http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&q=easyprojects.net&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= Google Scholar including a http://www.google.ca/patents?hl=en&lr=&vid=USPAT7657454&id=s8UFAQAAEBAJ&oi=fnd&dq=easyprojects.net&printsec=abstract#v=onepage&q=easyprojects.net&f=false US patent application. Finally, when it comes to project management software, as a project manager I can tell you that sources like the PM Network Magazine (biggest publication for the industry), GigaOm and CBS News are quite notable sources. The article may need better referencing but given the sources out there, I think there is enough to work with to bring it up to the standards of Wikipedia. Maybe instead of pure deletion nominations, we can give the page creator some constructive criticism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT||WP:NSOFT)