Deletion of Candace Young (2nd nomination)

Comment: She's still distant from passing . No significant change, and criterion 4 is nowhere near. Expertise has not been recognized in any third party publication. In fact,  is pretty distant as well because of the lack of reliable coverage by unrelated parties
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence of notability, certainly not rof#4. Far too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: This is nothing but puffery for a relatively unknown academic failing ,  and all 9 criteria of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: As suggested by Toddst1, salting may be appropriate, too. Does not seem to have improved noticeably since the previous AfD (I have no access to the deleted version, so this is judging from the comments made during that discussion). Some drummed-up stuff, nothing substantial enough to pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO)