Deletion of List of multi-instrumentalists (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  relative to :Category:Multi-instrumentalists. The article actually has potential to be expanded per the existent subcategories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: I commented above and was waiting for some new interpretations to come along. I agree with the last voter's reasoning, in that this list would be perpetually incomplete and would get uncomfortably close to the  standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Not seeing any real reason for deletion here. A multi-instrumentalist is not a musician that picks up another instrument once in a while. As we say in our article on the topic, it's a person with a professional level of proficiency in two or more instruments. An inclusion criteria would thus be easy to articulate (e.g. "notable musicians notable for a professional level of proficiency in two or more instruments," possibly requiring sources calling them a "multi-instrumentalist"). It's also a notable topic for a list, having received more than enough coverage (though it doesn't look like notability has been challenged). Being incomplete is explicitly not a valid reason for deletion, nor is being perpetually incomplete. We rarely do complete lists; we do ''encyclopedic'' lists. Every list of ''notable examples'' (including most musician-related lists) is going to be incomplete because they're not supposed to be complete. They're supposed to include what's encompassed by our inclusion criteria (typically ). &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC)