Deletion of Murad Gümen

Comment: per arguments below, namely  and the fact that notability is going to be really hard to show, especially after removing OR and references to the authorship of the site. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF)

Comment: WP:BLP and  apply here. The man is clearly a relatively unknown figure as there is no significant coverage about his work. All the sources refer to the potentially defamatory claim made by others (one includes the irrelevant tidbit about his father) and of the four, two are not |reliable sources. I opt for '''delete''' on the basis that the subject is a relatively unknown figure, |notability outside of these claims is not demonstrated, that the claims are potentially defamatory and harmful to the subject's reputation, and that he has requested deletion. The possibility of harm to a living person is the most important factor here in my view
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: following  and  and given that the core of their notability 9as an animator is not demonstrated I suspect  raises its head here too. Anyone can accuse someone else of something (a newspaper article portrayed me as three angry Americans once - innocent on all three counts) but it doesn't make it true or worthy of inclusion. So neither parts separately or combined prove notability and I can see why they'd be concerned about such claims as they could prove damaging to one's career, at the very least (you could also fear for your physical safety being linked to such a contentious issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF||WP:BLP||WP:UNDUE)