Deletion of Jason Lisle

Comment: I think we have to be very careful here about rendering emotional or subjective judgments in this case. I don't see a real POV problem here, as was floated above. The article reports details on schooling, publications, place of employment, etc. &ndash; all of this is, in fact, good biographical fodder. Nevertheless, I feel the subject still fails the notability test per the following: First, because the subject has a doctorate and works very conspicuously under that title, we should probably be testing against . WoS shows 3 publications in Astrophys. J. and Am. J. Phys. (top mainstream physics journals), however, his h-index is also only 3 and the total (collective) citations are only 27 &ndash; far short of our traditional requirements. Also, his books are not at all widely held, e.g. "Taking Back Astronomy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)