Deletion of James M. McCanney

Comment: Fails . Probably fails . 'Probably' because evidence for widespread media coverage over time could be hidden among the 9200 Google hits for "James McCanney". Amazon offers two self-published books of his, one of them with a decent sales rank, but it appears that that's not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: I spent some time reading in hopes of finding some claim as to what problem was solved, but only saw an ever-increasing crackpot index.  Charitably, this is |original research unfit for Wikipedia; less charitably, it's a probably a scam.  It's just possible that his physics is good, but his math is worse than wrong: it's gibberish
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)