Deletion of Yosimar Reyes (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . Currently a self-published poet who has received a little recognition, but not yet enough for |notability. I added the San Jose Mercury News reference to the article, because it does provide significant coverage in an independent reliable source, but GNG requires MULTIPLE such coverage and I couldn't find anything else. @Puliguti, if a few more such sources turn up in future years the article could be recreated, but you should study  to see what kind of coverage is required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:N||WP:42)

Comment: but even then, only just. I couldn't make sense of the references so I went and cleaned them up a bit. Many of them are ''by'' the subject, rather than ''about'' the subject, which is obviously a problem for |notability. There are a couple of sources that are probably okay, like the one from the San Francisco Gate and http://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2013/05/spoken-word-poet-yosimar-reyes-brings-comedy-conversation-to-crushcakes this from ''The Bottom Line''. He's also been featured on some newspaper-affiliated podcasts like http://www.independent.com/events/2013/may/02/29633/ this one. Some of that has been produced since the last AFD. All up, there's probably enough there for me... but only just. I can certainly see how it might not be enough for others and won't campaign against deletion if there's consensus for it - I think the nominator was well within the bounds of reasonableness bringing it here. And I agree it needs major work if it were to stay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: subject appears to have receive significant coverage from one non-primary reliable source http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SJ&s_site=mercurynews&p_multi=SJ&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=127BA5115D8BA110&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM the ''San Jose Mercury News'', but outside of that the subject has only received passing mention from reliable sources, and one significant coverage IMHO does not make notability. Therefore I have to say that the subject fails , , and that it is |too soon for the subject to be considered notable at this point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:TOOSOON)