Deletion of Dubbo College

Comment: The age and location of the school justify the presumption that there will be adequate suitable sources, so  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Just saying a subject deserves a well researched article doesn't cut it unless the sources necessary to create are available. Which in this case, they don't seem to be. Since from what I can tell everything out there about it is extremely trivial. Otherwise, people who think the article should be kept can provide  independent sources that address the subject directly and in-depth to actually make a good article with. If so, I'll be more then happy to change my vote to keep. I doubt anyone will though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: reading the above, why is there so much discussion about  and ? looking at the "nutshell" for norg: "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.", and at gng: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," the same, so whats the issue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Just for convenience: the 'Keep' votes here are all problematic. Firstly, , the guideline I cited in this nomination, reads: "'''All''' universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy WP:ORG, general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." (my bold, clearly). So the idea of the profitable status of the school deserving some special treatment or status is specifically ruled out. The guideline applies to ALL schools and there is an additional requirement for for-profit schools to pass WP:ORG, which I also cite and which this school does not pass in any case. Additionally, the idea that the age and location of an institution ''justify the presumption'' of notability is not to be found (quite rightly) in any guideline. , in fact, specifically states "However, once an article's notability has been challenged, '''merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive'''" (Again, my bold). Finally, the argument that the school is ''deserving of a well-researched and well-written article'' is clearly not in any guideline - and the question here is not what the school deserves, but whether it is notable enough to deserve anything. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL||WP:NEXIST)