Deletion of Watson-Marlow Pumps

Comment: Notability established |the usual way.  I see no reason to discount the usual standards here.  Just because it's about a commercial organisation doesn't mean it's spam - assuming such blindly is a disservice to our readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: see below).  The references for notability relate to an expansion programme which appears to have been heavily promoted: we have a press release (not independent, so does not count under ) plus the Falmouth Packet - a local (not regional) paper, also failing the secondary source requirement of .   also tells us to consider the ''depth'' of coverage - none of the articles says anything about the company per se, just that it was expanding and visited by a royal.  We have no evidence that the company is eminent in its field, innovative, or has achieved anything particularly special
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CORP)