Deletion of Top Gear races

Comment: as it's about a huge hit in Britain, for which |I can not understand, but |notable nonetheless.  Each article |could stand by itself with a bit of editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: I have seen no guarantee that anyone will add |references from third parties to meet  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: sources (at least looking through a search engine) are extremely hard to come by, what I have find are videos uploaded onto websites (legally dodgy), blogs and forum postings (both of those not acceptable as sources as per ), therefore the articles have no chance of meeting that aforementioned guideline. As for merging the text into the main Top Gear article, not even the text for any of the nominated articles in the main article is referenced! Strictly under , that could all be deleted as well (I won't, but it does need referencing). The same arguments that are affecting video game deletions could also apply here, in the way that specific elements and databases of a video game are being deleted (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Warcraft locations), this should also apply to television programmes as well. You could go as far as class the articles as Top Gear |fancruft and |trivia (it could violate #GUIDE if television programme segments were included in the same reasons as for other topics, ie. game and travel guides). Due to the above arguments, |notability cannot be established for all the articles. Don't get me wrong, I love Top Gear, and its appointment to view television for me every Sunday, but I feel that specific sections of episodes (in the same way that parts of video games have been deleted for the same reasons) are better served by a fan site or a off-site Wiki
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V||WP:CRUFT||WP:TRIVIA||WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: JRRobinson, please be aware that calling people names does not help your cause (). Much as I hate to say it, we do need sources for this all. Oh, and Guest 9999, please just add your signature as ~~~~ not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)