Deletion of New Romanization of Korean

Comment: as . So far Roe.ese has ''refused'' to provide any reliable sources - see Talk:New_Romanization_of_Korean and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?User_talk%3ARoe.ese&type=revision&diff=662261830&oldid=662259827. We should give him a few more days. If he still won't respond, it's safe to say that that romanization is his |original research, and needs to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP||WP:OR)

Comment: Linguistics articles are hard to assess; I was going to vote "weak keep" as marginally meeting , but its deletion from the Korean WP as OR clinches it for me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as  if we're being nice,  if we're not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:MADEUP)