Deletion of Hal Baumgarten

Comment: Everyone else prominent enough to be featured on the History Channel's programs about World War II has a bio on Wikipedia. If Baumgarten was wounded at Normandy, received a Bronze Star Medal, wrote a credible book about his experiences, and engaged in other activities which establish his prominence, he should be profiled. The article meets the criteria of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: most of the coverage is of the form of news articles about the fact that he has talked about his experiences. I'm not getting the right  vibe that is needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Can't see any real notability. Private who got a very minor award (at a level not even considered a true medal by many countries rather than anywhere near the level we usually require for an article - in Britain we call this level of bravery award a mention in dispatches!), wrote his memoirs and has appeared on TV talking about his experiences just like hundreds of other veterans. It's a load of old drivel that everyone who has appeared on these documentaries has or should have an article. No doubt a decent, brave man, and I'm certainly not disparaging his contribution, but certainly does not in any way pass  or any other standard of notability and is no more worthy of an article than any one of the other millions of veterans of the Second World War
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)