Deletion of Conrad Fort Lauderdale

Comment: From what I've been able to find so far, this project seems to have received substantial non-local and local coverage for several reasons--its initial and controversial connection to Trump and the failed financing of that project, e.g. ''Foreign Policy'' http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/11/30/legal-war-over-botched-deal-shows-how-trump-wins-even-when-loses/, its atypical design by Michael Graves, e.g. ''The Architect's Newspaper'' https://archpaper.com/2015/09/rare-albino-graves/, and the kind of coverage you'd typically see for a ritzy project of this size and profile (mainly, although not only, local coverage like http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/tourism/fl-conrad-fort-lauderdale-preview-20151014-story.html this).  The third category is perhaps bordering on the |run of the mill, but the first two groups seem more distinctive to me, and certainly not limited to local. On balance I think this falls on the notable side of the spectrum
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)