Deletion of Dan Riskin

Comment: It is a strange coincidence that as of time of writing this comment, the nominator and two voters have combined edits of one hundred. The article also appears to be a case of , making this page dubious
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:CITEKILL)

Comment: since I don't see any actual argument against , which was the point of this AfD. There are enough secondary sources over a period of time to support basic criteria in . The primary sources are irritating, but aren't particularly misused. There have been a lot of editors of the page and the content seems reasonably neutral
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BIO)