Deletion of Michael Keith Smith (2nd nomination)

Comment: He has been the subject of non-trivial articles by reputable sources including http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/story/0,,1737445,00.html the Guaridan, so I say it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Three claims to notability in the article backed by more than one non-trivial mention in mainstream news sources.  Clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Would  apply now?  As Sandy Dancer's comments have been answered and Ed Chilvers has not come on to explain why it should be deleted, can we now close this discussion as keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)