Deletion of Ch. Vasantha Rao

Comment: Despite being long and heavily sourced, most of the sourcing is very poor and shows no evidence of passing . And the only real shot of passing , the college presidency, seems dubious to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: The most notable thing here is the principalship, which I don't think satisfies : see the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Yesurathnam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I  point out that many hundreds of citations are usually considered necessary to qualify under rof #1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Nothing I've seen in the very spirited defense of this academic by his friends convinces me that he passes our thresholds for  or any other  guideline. The "principal" aspect of his position is a subordinate position inside a larger university; furthermore, by special arrangement it is a strictly term-limited rotating position, and hence is insufficient for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)