Deletion of Mikhail Tank (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article was created by {{user|Stevenlevine1}}. As can be seen from press releases hosted by Tank's website, this name matches that of Tank apparent PR firmhttp://www.mikhailtank.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/Mikhail_Tank_April_Press_Release_V3.104185814.pdf. I will inform Stevenlevine1 about . &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I'm going to go against the obvious flow on this one. Profiles present on IMDB, and on allmusic.com.  returns over 19,000 hits. The artist's rantings and antics at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Wikipedia.27s_oversights_of_swift_deletion is highly objectionable, but an artist being objectionable isn't a reason to delete the article on that person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:GOOGLETEST)

Comment: Though this article is part of a conscious PR effort by the subject, it is still |reliably sourced and contains valuable encyclopedic information about a not-so-well-known artist.&nbsp;—&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: the sources cited are not sufficient to demonstrate that the subject satisfies  per Scientizzle, nor is there any indication that the subject passes a subject-specific notability guideline. To counter the Keep opinions: raw numbers of google hits means very little indeed, and the total number of unique hits is under 800, "contains valuable encyclopedic information" is not a valid argument either, as it boils down to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ITSUSEFUL)