Deletion of Batman Triumphant

Comment: If the article had any sniff of |reliable sources I would advocate keep in the interest of Batman History. However, with just fanzines as sources, I can't advocate keeping something that is essentially unverified speculation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: First of all, Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  A film like this "should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place," which it never did.  Furthermore,  states that unreleased films are "generally '''not''' appropriate unless the ''production'' of the film is notable in some way."  Seeing that this film never even entered production, it can't even qualify for notability.  It's not even "unfinished", it was never started. If this article is kept, then it will be trimmed down substantially based on the speculative bits in the article.  There wasn't even a script treatment released about this supposed film -- how can anything be assumed about what takes place?  If this film article is kept, we may as well create film articles for other films that never got beyond pre-production.  As I've said, ''Batman Triumphant'' already has its own section in the ''Batman & Robin (1997 film)#Sequel|Batman & Robin'' film article, and any information from this particular article should be adapted to fit that paragraph instead of having its own article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTFILM)