Deletion of Quiet Internet Pager (2nd nomination)

Comment: Might become notable when noticed by the general marketplace, but for now I suspect 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ARTSPAM)

Comment: Do you remember ?? At least 10 million people from Russia, Germany, Israel, Bulgaria, Ukraine, etc use QIP. Is it not enough for article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNORE)

Comment: The fact that this software is represented on eleven other Wikipedia projects weakens claims that it is "not notable" in any common sense meaning of that word.  I didnt check all of them, but the Russian, Czech and German Wikipedias have substantial revision histories with many different editors contributing.  It might be a  issue.  But it is obviously not a self-evident NN candidate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: given sources are not significant and I cannot find any such. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per the Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 November 3#Quiet Internet Pager|November 3, 2009 DRV and sources that were added to the article that show this software to be notable and quite popular. The repeated nominations and "|its just not notable" arguments from the same editors, one of whom has a major Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest with articles relating to computer software and hardware, who continues to engage in Wikipedia:Tendentious editing|tendentious editing, and who continues to attempt to drive off productive editors is extremely Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive, and it needs to stop
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN)