Deletion of Windows Live Betas

Comment: While I would love to be able to keep under  (which has been cited above in a manner completely inverse to it's meaning), I cannot justify it. I can find lots of references to the site, but they are all fleeting mentions. Hundreds of news articles that state something is available for download at the site, plus dozens of printed press releases, don't add up to notability due to the lack of depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The fact that I declined the speedy deletion only means that I considered the article to not meet any of the narrow |criteria for speedy deletion, and should not be deleted without discussion. It may still be deemed non-notable after a discussion at AfD. In fact, if I remember correctly, I encouraged Fleet Command to nominate the article for AfD if they wished to pursue deletion further
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Thanks for the notice Damaster98. However, note that the article still fails |general notability guideline as this article has only provided Wikipedia:No original research#Primary.2C secondary and tertiary sources|primary sources while notability requires coverage from independent sources. Besides, |notability is not temporary. My concern however is that your sources are either primary or temporary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)