Deletion of Clear Paddock Creek

Comment: It being a geographical feature is an assertion of notability. A geographical feature (see ) that has received a fair amount of coverage beyond statistics and coordinates, generally for its rehabilitation.  http://books.google.com/books?id=WZOAeROCzTAC&lpg=PA86&dq=%22Clear%20Paddock%20Creek%22&pg=PA86#v=onepage&q=%22Clear%20Paddock%20Creek%22&f=falsehttp://books.google.com/books?id=6H2VfnFEb2gC&lpg=PA171&dq=%22Clear%20Paddock%20Creek%22&pg=PA171#v=onepage&q=%22Clear%20Paddock%20Creek%22&f=falseand it appears a seven page chapter is devoted to this creek in http://books.google.com/books?id=RxRIAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Clear+Paddock+Creek%22&dq=%22Clear+Paddock+Creek%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=l6wBUt_ZN4vhigLy64DgCA&ved=0CFMQ6AEwBg this book.  It also appears Environmental Trust (New South Wales) wrote an entire book on this creek.  http://www.worldcat.org/title/restoring-the-waters-project-report-clear-paddock-creek-fairfiled/oclc/682543666http://books.google.com/books/about/Restoring_the_Waters_Project_Report_Clea.html?id=MQDmZwEACAAJ.  The Fairfield, New South Wales City Council also devoted public significant coverage to this. http://www.fairfieldcity.nsw.gov.au/upload/xxkcn99969/Clear_Paddock_Creek_Restoring_the_Waters.pdf  It was inappropriate to nominate this article for deletion within one day of its creation http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clear_Paddock_Creek&diff=567467225&oldid=567330920 and is a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO||WP:BITE)