Deletion of List of herbivorous animals

Comment: Nominator cites no policies that this article fails. Having a category is not a reason for deletion - lists and categories go hand-in-hand, per . Completely unmanagable?! It has about 30 entries! If it can be managed as a category, then a list should be no problem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: per . It is way too broad to be usable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: It's actually the category that would be too cumbersome in this case because a category with hundreds of thousands of articles in it does not seem practically useful.  A list seems a better approach because it can be constructed in a more intelligent fashion by listing broad classes of animals such as ruminants, rodents, termites, fruit-eating bats, &c.  Anyway,  says clearly that we don't delete lists to favour categories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLS)

Comment: Topic is notable, list just needs some organization to make it useful and maintainable.  The Category arguments are bogus as always.  Don't these people ever read 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)