Deletion of Presenter

Comment: or '''DAB''' (secondary): Not notable. One reference (a glossary) for a 492 word article means there is a lot of |original research or Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrasing. I am continually amazed when I see someone !voting "keep" and commenting SOFIXIT. "If" notability is contested by one it is silly to then comment there is notability (with one reference) so anyone !voting delete needs to fix the article. This seems like a two-way street
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Notable topic which is distinctly different from journalists and news presenters and is useful for linking. If there are problems with the article then this can be addressed through normal editing not deletion, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)