Deletion of Leslie Kolodziejski

Comment:  states that academics meeting any one of a list of criteria are considered notable. Criterion 3 is "The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the IEEE)." A IEEE_Fellow|Fellow of the IEEE "cannot be applied for directly by the member – instead the candidate must be nominated by others." The OSA_Fellow|Fellow of the Optical Society, is similarly highly selective, as per the wiki page, it requires one to be "nominated by a peer group of other current, OSA Fellows. Review of the nomination is then passed to the OSA Fellow Members Committee." The Optical Society is a "major scholarly society". Thus Leslie Kolodziejski meets , as do all other Fellows of the Optical Society. In the specific criteria notes on , it states that "For documenting that a person has been elected member or fellow ... publications of the electing institution are considered a reliable source." Thus the reference given in Leslie Kolodziejski's article is sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Elected fellowship of this learned society is not a self-promotional activity, and the criteria are publichttps://www.osa.org/en-us/awards_and_grants/fellow_members/nomination_instructions/. This satisfies in itself  but the named chairs strengthen the case to make it totally unambiguous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: I share Netoholic's  concerns here regarding sourcing and use of sources. I don't think she passes GNG per my BEFORE. I am uncertain whether OSA Fellow is sufficient for NPROF(3) (it very well might however). Running through her publications (h-index of around 17? though not first named author on the highly-cited ones) NPROF(1) seems plausible (need to further evaluate). However, by previously holding a named-chair in MIT she passes NPROF(5). As the subject passes PROF (which does not require GNG), and since Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup (in relation to the BLP/sourcing issues) - this is a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per  as mentioned by several individuals above. Netoholic, I'm sensing a trend that your view of notability policy/guidelines are not in line with the general consensus. Maybe take your thoughts to Village Pump rather than repeatedly nominating articles that are not likely to be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)