Deletion of 2010–11 Cambridge United F.C. season

Comment: There's a very good reason to keep this: the article clearly passes .  isn't exclusionary, and certainly how a team finished has nothing to do with whether or not the season qualifies for an article - it's all about whether secondary sources substantively said sufficient stuff supporting a season article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: under criterion |# three ({{tq|The nomination is so erroneous that it indicates the nominator has not even read the page in question}}) as the nomination's claim that the club {{tq|didn't do anything worth mentioning}} is roundly refuted by 2010–11_Cambridge_United_F.C._season#References|the number of reliable sources who found plenty worth mentioning. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SKCRIT)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)