Deletion of Kreuz Hannover-Ost

Comment: nbsp; We have a complete structure of German autobahns in the encyclopedia.&nbsp; We even have separate templates for Dreieck and Kreuz.&nbsp; The German Dreieck's and Kreuz's that are named always connect two Autobahns.&nbsp; This means that any Dreieck or Kreuz is already known to be covered in two other topics already in existence on Wikipedia.&nbsp; This is sufficient to know that there is no policy basis to delete the "topic", also known on Wikipedia as the "subject".&nbsp; I would also argue that these topics satisfy our wp:notability guidelines, but analyzing this point between keep and merge becomes academic, given that there is no policy basis for a deletion discussion.&nbsp; Any decision to redirect or merge can be handled under diting policy, which might consider more than wp:notability in the decision.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E)

Comment: none of which addresses the lack of notability of this particular interchange. As per : if the subject of an article "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article". None of which this article, or interchange, has demonstrated, nor have any of the !votes for "keep" provided evidence of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)