Deletion of Denis Dubourdieu

Comment: As well as the evidence of notability compiled above, reliable sources say that he "played a leading role in the improvement of the region's white wines" (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-154790255.html International Herald Tribune 2008), "led a revolution in quality in Bordeaux white wines over the past 15 years" (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-20418282.html Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 2009), is "one of the top specialists in the winemaking process and the ageing of white wines" (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-297921162.html South Africa Saturday Star 2012), is "wine’s most famous scientist" (http://www.decanter.com/people-and-places/wine-articles/487934/denis-dubourdieu-decanter-interview Decanter 2004), and that the "lighter, fresher style of so many Bordeaux whites owes much" to his work (http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/18/dining/wine-talk-a-case-of-neglect-white-bordeaux.html New York Times 2000). A very clear and strong pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: According to the Web of Science, Dubourdieu has over 100 publications in peer reviewed journals, of which 11 that have each been cited between 100 and 206 times. Total cites in the thousands, h-index of 38. Clear pass of #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Even if Guillaume2303 hadn't made a valid argument about this person's notability under , Agne27 made an equally valid argument about his notability as a winemaker under . Both editors are correct, the topic is notable, and the article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)