Deletion of Sarah Irving

Comment: The nomination doesn't seem to make much sense as it discounts the sources which explain her significance.  And where's the consideration of |alternatives to deletion?  Our |editing policy applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Vermont asked for my opinion One of the few cases I think we ought to bend : She's not (yet) notable in her own right, but if, say, you're googling around looking for information on the future of Irving Oil (not infeasible) this article would probably be pretty useful to you, and so IMO it should stick around. -- Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation if and when she ''does'' succeed to the head of the company. We don't hold  in abeyance just because there's a possibility that a stronger claim of notability ''might'' emerge in the future, per  — we wait until a stronger notability claim ''has'' emerged, and then create the article accordingly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTCRYSTAL)