Deletion of Pao effect

Comment: This stub meets all the requirements of notability , verifiability ), reliable sources , and what Wikipedia is not OT. This article can be fixed through normal editing. The creator of the article and other editors should be given more time to develop the article. Since other editors have some questions regarding the article expressed here in this AfD, perhaps such concerns should be expressed on the talk page of the article so that they can be addressed there as suggested by rticles for deletion. The topic “Pao effect” is a separate topic and differs from content contained in the article about Pao. This term is used in refs 1, 3, 4, and 5. A further search for sources resulted in http://www.jingmag.com/ellen-pao-and-silicon-valley/ this,http://www.chron.com/bayarea/article/Twitter-sexism-suit-could-have-greater-impact-6153974.php this, http://www.chron.com/bayarea/article/Twitter-sexism-suit-could-have-greater-impact-6153974.php this. The topic is quite separate from the person and describes the formation of a legal precident. The article is not about the lawsuit or the person. The topic has gained wide-spread acceptance as described in the sources. Unreliable sources, which are not used in the article, show that the topic is a major topic of discussion in legal blogs and other forms of online discussions. It is not a little used term and has gained widespread acceptance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOT||WP:A)

Comment: there are |too many forks at this table.  Please, let's merge ''Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins'' into this, or vice-versa
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: Redirect''' to Pao v. Kleiner Perkins - The |neologism is mentioned a number of times in sources, but it's a term about the effect of a case (or its plaintiff in filing that suit), and we already have an article about the case. A notable neologism? Maybe, but that doesn't mean it needs a stand-alone article. I just https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins&diff=682435341&oldid=682210906 rewrote the relevant section in the article about the case, using some of the sources in this article. There's not really any need for a merge, rather than a redirect, but that's the end result here. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)