Deletion of Structure (category theory)

Comment: This article is written as an essay, and even as an epistemological essay. The title is misleading, as suggesting that "stucture" is a concept of category theory. This is not the case, as said in the second paragraph ("In category theory structure is discussed implicitly"). The epistemologic idea that is presented can roughly be summarized as: In mathematics, some structural properties are similar in very different contexts, and some major progresses originated in recognizing these similarities; category theory is often useful for explaining and formalizing these similarities. Personally, I agree with this epistemological assertion, but, as there are few reliable publications and rarely a consensus in epistemology of mathematics, this must be considered as . Also, the main concepts of category theory that are related to this epistemological idea are not mentioned in the article (functor and equivalence of category). So there is nothing in the article that can be used in WP. I oppose also to a merge, as it could be done only in an aticle about epistemology of mathemtics, and we do not have any such article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: A note:  is a completely invalid delete reason here.  But what's here is beyond repair. This article is written like a personal reflection essay.  At best, according to nLab, it seems to be a historical approach that Bourbaki was developing as an alternative to the category theory of today, but it didn't catch on.  As such, it doesn't seem to be notable.  If this is merged anywhere, it should be to Category theory, but I would still recommend deleting{{snd}}there's nothing here of sufficient quality {{em|to}} merge. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)