Deletion of Woodlands House School (Girl's Wing)

Comment: The school has not attracted significant coverage in secondary reliable sources, as required by . Its mere existence is not sufficient to show its notability. The references cited above are passing mentions and fail , which applies to schools. If the result is keep, which I think it shouldn't be, there certainly isn't enough coverage of the girls' wing to make it independently notable of the boys' wing and thus the two articles should be merged. I did a search and could find no further examples of significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The "Girl's Wing" in particular does not seem to pass . The school itself might pass it (although I am not sure the references Anbu121 noted confirm even the school meets ), but not this wing. If there were an article on the school itself, maybe a redirect would be ok, but there is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: with Boy's wing and rename to Woodlands House School.  says secondary/high schools are almost always notable, but not convinced we need 2 articles on 1 school
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)