Deletion of Penta Security

Comment: Topic looks like it fails . While the article cites a number of sources, said coverage lacks the depth and intellectual independence to qualify the subject as meeting NCORP; too many sources are press releases, routine business announcements, or trivial in nature. The article lists some awards the company has won, but none of these appear to be particularly notable either. As this is a Korean company some potential sources may exist in Korean, but these would need to be brought forward and heavily scrutinized. In addition - and per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#User:Therachelyoon_and_Penta_Security|this COIN thread - this article can credibly be said to have been created with the intent to promote the topic in violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: The best reference appears to be the 2014 company profile piece in Datanet. Aside from that, there are press releases (such as https://chargedevs.com/newswire/hubject-and-penta-security-partner-on-secure-ev-charging/ December 2019), product inclusion in market vendor surveys, all of which help verify that this is a company going about its business, but I am not seeing sufficient |coverage to demonstrate |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:NCORP)

Comment: Does not pass . The links posted by HighKing above are mostly passing mentions. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)