Deletion of Erich W. Kopischke

Comment: as per nom, even if there were notability guidelines that say they are "presumed" notability as per  "meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPERSON)

Comment: as subject does not meet , and consensus is that LDS leaders are not presumed notable (see discussions in Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2014#Religious_leaders|2014, Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2016#Leaders in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and other religious organizations|2016, Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2017#Exception Proposal for General Authority Seventies of the LDS_Church|2017, and Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 August 3|2018). Sources in article are not independent (''Liahona'', lds.org, ''Church News'', and an almanac branded as ''Deseret News'' but actually assembled by ''Church News'' staff) or not reliable ("Grampa Bill"). Search finds passing mentions in routine coverage of church announcements and events, some quotes in a wire service article about the church's use of social media, and a couple of paragraphs in a ''Deseret News'' piece about RootsTech genealogy successes. It doesn't add up to significant coverage ''of the subject''. Open to alternatives if significant coverage emerges
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)