Deletion of Sum Ying Fung (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails . No other notability than surviving to an old age
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per sources found by Cunard shows this passes  ,  and . NOPAGE does not apply due to significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: to List of Canadian supercentenarians#Sum Ying Fung. Longevity may lead to notability, but in this case it led to  coverage - a small spate of coverage in Canadian and Chinese outfits shortly before and after her death
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: per io, specifically that her life was "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded." I assert that extreme longevity passes that test. RS, as already laid out in the article, back up the claims made therein, causing this person to pass the GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: This article fails , ,  and . There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like she was impacted by an immigration law, witnessed a well known event in China, and survived cancer. Her name, life dates, and nationality are best handled on a list. This  is not needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB)

Comment: I don't see enough evidence of the type of sustained, in-depth coverage that would satisfy the requirements for a standalone page per . Anything of encyclopedic value can be included on one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Cunard. I don't believe old age immediately qualifies as being |notable enough for a stand-alone page. All pertinent details look great in Cunard's merge
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)