Deletion of Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada

Comment: The meaning of "indiscriminate information" is not limited to the things on that numbered list.  You hit it on the head with "children of."  A list of the people themselves would not be indiscriminate information.  However, a list of their children ''is'', per  ''Six Degrees of Separation''. Since the children are not famous in their own right, this is a list of trivial information, or as they say around here, |cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: as unencyclopedic listcruft.  an indiscriminate collection of information, and not a collection of everything that has happened in history. I think that people who come to AFD and go "keep, useful/interesting" don't actually get it. Wikipedia is not a collection of everything that is useful or interesting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: not a rationale for keeping, see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)