Deletion of Danielle Cohn

Comment: Mainly primary-sourced biography of a non-notable teenager who's active on social media. Searches don't find anything compelling to indicate notability. Most of what's not primary is related to her estranged father making a fuss about her age and her alleged sexualisation on social media, which is all a bit . Apart from that, reliable sources aren't writing ''about'' her, but merely mentioning her as an example of her type
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . The problem is that so much about this ''child'' is not verifiable; not her age, not who her family is, not why she does what she does, or how to respond |to allegations of child neglect and sexual abuse. Wikipedia is a charity, |not a free web-host or a scandal rag. If we take all the |unreliable sources out, there's nothing left for even a stub. |Whenever there's been doubt about a child's notability, |we have always erred on the side of caution
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CRIME||WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:BARE||WP:OUTCOMES)