Deletion of Colossus Telescope

Comment: WP:TOOSOON and of course a lack of |non-primary sources to indicate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: to Extremely large telescope. Wikipedia is a |tertiary source. We require that topics be already well known (notable in the Wikipedia sense) as shown by reliable pubished sources covering the topic in depth. These need to be secondary sources, not the primary sources written by people associated with the Colossus project. The fact that the primary sources are peer reviewed doesn't matter. {{u|Quantanew}}, this does not mean that the project is not worthy of note. It just hasn't been published about yet by people independent of the project. We have the same problem with many technical topics that come out of industry rather than academia, where all discussion of development was internal. It can be very frustrating, but if there isn't published independent material there can't be a Wikipedia article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:TERTIARY)