Deletion of Witness accounts of the Roswell UFO incident

Comment: An article with 85 footnotes is a rare commodity on Wikipedia, and the article identifies persons who claim to have been witnesses.  This is a legitimate subset of an already lenghty Roswell article.  I agree with the persons who observe that this looks like a serious case of .   As for criticism that there is "no analysis" and "no thesis", that's a ''good'' thing, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:OR)

Comment: Well-sourced, and connected to a notable topic. The fact some people are referring to this as a "marginal topic" is a POV judgement call. We aren't allowed to base our decisions on . Using that criteria it could be argued that there are too many articles about 911, too. I wouldn't be voting to keep if this wasn't very well sourced. And as people keep telling me, the sources are the key. However I would recommend a new title for the article. "UFO incident" is itself a POV violation as it's generally referred to as the Roswell Incident or the Roswell Crash. To state an opinion that it was a UFO goes a bit beyond our job here. Let the witnesses make that claim
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)