Deletion of Dynamic Airways Flight 405

Comment: I agree with the comment by Edison, who explains the issue well. The event is unusual because of the number of passengers who safely evacuated an aircraft that was on fire. At the same time, it is also too soon to determine the impact of this event. Per , it's too soon to determine the lasting significance of the event; it should be revisited in a few months to allow its significance to be better realized
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: Actually, MilborneOne, it IS quite unusual for the passengers to all slide down the chutes while an airliner engine and wing are engulfed in flame while tens of gallons of fuel leak out. Marginal notability at this point; notability might or might not become clearer when investigations are complete.  I do not see an established guideline for notability airliner accidents. There was serious damage to the 29 year old aircraft, though no statement has been made that the airframe is beyond repair. One serious injury and numerous hospitalizations. In  http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/29/us-florida-dynamic-idUSKCN0SN2CJ20151029 a Reuters story a former NTSB investigator said the NTSB "will try to determine the source of the fire and why it caused so much damage, and could recommend modifications to the 767 fleet and general airline procedures to prevent a recurrence," so there is at least the potential for the incident to have significant effects. It is certainly not a catastrophic airliner crash, but is more significant than lots of inflight incidents which get some press coverage but the articles about which get deleted per . We can revisit in a year or two and see if the incident satisfies  and gets more than the primary sourcing to news coverage it has now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERSISTENCE)