Deletion of Yulia Putintseva

Comment: After reevaluating this and taking another look at the topic, it does indeed appear to pass  - that is, has been the subject of significant coverage from multiple |reliable secondary sources that are |verifiable. This includes archived news articles, as well as more recent coverage - in multiple different languages. Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Notwithstanding the "scholarly" debate above about whether she is important, multiple |reliable secondary sources that are |verifiable have seen fit to provide significant coverage about the subject. What would become of a Wikipedia that put its article inclusion decision making above the decisions by reliable sources? Wikipedia would become nothing more than just another website on the web. Cirt has it right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: as indicated by the nominator, she fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTENNIS)