Deletion of Tron sequel (film)

Comment: Can I suggest that editors read  in regard to unreleased films?  Take a look at the following articles which have been successfully merged and will be placed in their own source materials' articles if (not when, if) they enter production: 24 (film), Ant-Man (film), Driver (film), Fahrenheit 451 (2008 film), The Flash (film), Gears of War (film), The Hobbit (2009 film), The Jetsons (film), Jurassic Park IV, Knight Rider (film), Land of the Lost (film), Logan's Run (2010 film), Magneto (film), Metal Gear Solid (film), Namor (film), Onimusha (film), Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time (film), Spawn 2, Spider-Man 4, Spy Hunter: Nowhere to Run, Street Fighter (2008 film), Superman: The Man of Steel (film), The Sims (film), Underworld 3, Voltron (film), Warcraft (film), Wolverine (film), Wonder Woman (film), and X-Men 4.  As you can tell, a lot of these projects are of franchises of similar notability to ''Tron'', many being more so.  These items are merged because the development process of a project is slow and subject to many factors.  Just read the history of each not-yet-produced project to understand the delays that occur in the film industry
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: The sequel has been rumored forever, but this is concrete action, and Disney is pretty credible when they announce their projects.  permits articles about films if they are well-sourced and very likely to actually be produced. The sequel rumors alone should make it sufficient in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per the |notability guidelines for films.  Stand-alone articles of notable films should only be created if the film enters production.  There are many factors that can halt a project before it ever reaches production.  The verifiable content should exist at the original film article, and when this one enters production, a stand-alone article can be created (especially under the right title per naming conventions for films
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: On one hand, Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball, and the whole idea of the movie might go nowhere, and end up in history's garbage bin.  On the other hand, all those Canceled_Superman_films|canceled Superman movies have their own article.  But other scifi/fantasy genres that have had rumored movies that died after years of buzz but no activity (Star_Blazers|Star Blazers comes to mind). Maybe the collective effect of all the Superman movies merits an article, as much as been published and written about those movies, whereas here there's not much information beyond a couple of press releases
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)