Deletion of Carl Kline (White House official)

Comment: Kline appears to have taken two dozen unusual, important, and decisive actions over a period of two years in granting security clearances to persons who did not quality under regular rules.  News coverage of those actions is piled up in the shorter period of time that he has been identified in public, but even that covers two months from many reliable sources.  It's a historic situation, a natural subject for national security documentation where his name is likely to appear for decades to come, possibly in parallel to Aldrich Ames or Robert Hanssen.  An argument for  seems to depend on it being a brief blip of news about a one-time event, the "imbroglio" -- but the events Kline caused went for a longer time and have a long-term effect. They aren't a brief scandal.  I say the BLP1E argument is not relevant and say the news coverage standard applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)