Deletion of Wikitruth (5th nomination)

Comment: If it doesn't amass any more |notability over the next several months, I would nominate it for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Per above/ , notability is permanent, nothing has change sense the last AfD that resulted in keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Even the nominator seems to admit that it has met  there is no "temporary" nature to this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: for the record I hate this fucking site, its nothing but slimy attacks on people like FCYTravis, Kelly Martin, SlimVirgin, Danny, etc... the list goes on... but at this point this is becoming extreme  material. I'm all for keeping any article thats already survived 4 AFD debates. Even if that article is something as disgusting as this website. &nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Meets  as the website has received non-trivial coverage from multiple independent sources.  Now that I've read their main page I see they reported on the '''{{article|Richardson family murders}}''' article which was deleted out of process http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Uncensored:Richardson_family_murders for over a month.  That really makes me wonder how often things like this go unnoticed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This is a wate of time, as nothing has changed since the last AfD only a few months ago, and the nominator's rationale is completely refuted by well-established guidelines on notability, namely. #Notability_is_not_temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There's no question that they've become notable enough to have been covered in several reputable publications; however, these mentions generally only mention the website as part of the larger whole of Wikipedia criticism, and don't cover Wikitruth itself enough for a full |verifiable article to be written on it. Thus, a merge to the main Criticism article would be best
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: This has survived four AfDs, trying to remove it now is purely procedural.  It's clearly established as notable; the fact that there are other, more popular criticism sites, has nothing to do with anything.  If it was |notable then, it's notable now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)