Deletion of German tank aces

Comment: the topic is notable per  due to the level of coverage it has received. The main issues appear to be regarding content and ''how'' we choose to cover the issue (or about what name we give the article), not that it ''actually is'' covered in Wikipedia at all. The fact that ''some'' interpretations of the concept might be fringe-like doesn't disqualify us from covering it (and them) as long as we address that issue, likewise if ''some'' of the sources which cover it are considered to be less reliable than others doesn't prevent us from using / mentioning them and the role they have played in developing the concept (as long as it is with care and appropriate attribution, and academic reviews of them included if available, etc.). These are all questions of editorial judgment and as such I don't think AFD is appropriate in this case. By all means ensure the article addresses the issue that it is disputed / ahistorical or whatever, but the fact that it is widely covered in popular literature means many people are interested in the topic so why not provide the information to our readers in a critical manner which might educate and inform them? Indeed recent changes to the article look promising to me and suggest that that is an achievable objective
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not sure why this has been taken to AfD before there was any discussion on the talk page... Regardless, the concept is clearly notable as it is covered by the multiple reliable sources cited in the "Overview" section of the article - I'm not sure why these are being dismissed? This nomination is also rather confusing as the article discusses the concept of a "tank ace" critically, noting that it is a disputed concept, so the -style argument above doesn't really apply. This is an article about the alleged concept of a tank ace, and not an endorsement of such a thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)