Deletion of Hungarian Spectrum

Comment: to Éva Balogh, otherwise '''delete'''. Given that none of the coverage (except perhaps the ''Libertatea'' interview article) offer significant coverage of the blog itself, this article should be deleted. However, there is an argument for the notability of the author of the blog herself via #1 as she is cited in dozens of news articles in dozens of languages ''through the blog''. This article can easily be converted into one on its author, with much of the content shifted to a section for the blog itself
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: There is a clear consensus that this blog is mentioned by many notable medias all around the world, but there is no (not yet?) consensus whether this is a ''significant coverage'', or, in other words, whether these mentions are ''trivial mentions''. In fact,  says "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". The open question is thus "what is a trivial mention?". Clearly a sentence such as "there is a blog called Hungarian Spectrum" is a trivial mention. But the mentions of the blog in medias are not of this type, they of the type "our source for some aspect of the political situation in Hungaria is Hungarian spectrum". This is far to be trivial, as this implies that the blog is an influential media. I agree that this implication is somehow , but every reader may understand that by himself, and may therefore want to know more about the blog. This makes a WP article very useful. Therefore, if the blog does not satisfy formally the notability guidelines, this means that  applies here ({{tqq|If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, '''ignore it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:OR||WP:IAR)

Comment: abundant coverage in RS. Unfortunately for IP,  is not a valid deletion rationale
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)