Deletion of Shaul Navon

Comment: per nomination. The strenuous and extraordinary effort to attach notability to a non-notable subject is to be noted, admired, and rightfully discarded. Nothing in the avalanche supports notability as prescribed in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: According to Google Scholar the subject's highest cited paper has 15 citations. That's well below the standard required by #1, and I can see no indication that he passes any other criterion of  or the WP:general notability guideline|general notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)