Deletion of Albina Library

Comment: Public funds are used to build these libraries and they serve as a center of the community - yea, reliable sources are going to write about them in detail. The assumption that none of these library topics would meet  is not reasonable. The deletion proposal to delete these articles and have their information listed in one article seems to be based on the state of the articles themselves, not whether each topic meets  or fails . The state of any article can be improved by improving the article, not deleting it. If this AfD is closed as no consensus, feel free to individually list any of the libraries at AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: At least one article meets the GNG.  I am not a fan of multi-nominations, and while I accept some laxity in nominating a *single* article for deletion, I really expect much better  if you want to nominate '''sixteen''' at a time.  I have been here for over ten years, and spent years improving some articles.  Waiting a mere two months for an editor who a) has proven he can improve the articles to '''good''' status and b) has volunteered to improve these as well, does not impress upon me the immediate need to delete them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)