Deletion of Journal of Foreign Relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: Sometimes something newly created becomes instantaneously notable. Sometimes something that has not been released yet is already notable (I received ''Time'' magazine today and its cover story is about a yet-to-be released movie, which also got already a lot of coverage here in France). However, the ''Journal of Foreign Relations'' (JoFR) is not one of these cases. Yes, notable people are involved. Yes, those people get cited/covered elsewhere and that coverage may even mention JoFR. That is not, however, the coverage that satisfies , , or ournals for that matter. (This is indeed not an academic journal, but even if one would argue it is, it doesn't meet those criteria either). No independent sources ''about'' this website, hence: not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB||WP:NJ)

Comment: there seems little to demonstrate that this is more than a new news portal and no external and non-tangential evidence of notability has been put forward. I can quote the WSJ or The Times on my blog, and relabel it as a "journal", it would still fail . Rather than encouraging the article to be created and deleted for a third time, I would not be against the article being userfied if the contributor genuinely wishes to do more than promote this website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)