Deletion of Markus Winter

Comment: per . I agree that the keep !votes are not based on any actual Wikipedia policies (although I think SPA might be a bit far), and that although there has been much mention of the NYT articles, they only discuss Winter in the context of his gallery / exhibitions. They are not about he himself. Thus they are great sources for his gallery, etc., but poor for the individual. I cannot find sufficient |independent third-party |reliable sources to indicate |depth or |persistence of coverage at this time: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Markus+Winter&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=OrwRWePzCsSDgAbU9LmADQ#tbm=nws&q=%22Markus+Winter%22+art  (blogs and zines, excluding the passing mentions). Fails .  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:RS||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per {{U|Agricola44}} - there has been |significant coverage in good sources. Taken as a whole, ''Times'', ''Digest'', ''Welt'', all add up. Ordinary editing can remove the puffery
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)