Deletion of Clarice Phelps (2nd nomination)

Comment: per |G4.  No substantial difference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: for lack of souces to establish that she is either a notable research scientist and for lack of coverage  that could pass .  Despite a disingenuous statement by editor who quickly re-created this page:  (recreated page that was deleted. I really want this to stay up, so please advise where I need to improve instead of just nominating for deletion.) the requirements  for  and notability were explained in detail when we ran this drill a few weeks ago.  New sources and accomplishments have not appeared
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Not notable for stand alone article; was only scientific research team; fails , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)