Deletion of Giorgi Rtskhiladze

Comment: As mention by X1, he appears 27 times in the Mueller report. This makes him more prominent in the report than former policy director to the Trump campaign John Mashburn (11 results) and Michael Glassner (12), who introduced Papadopoulos to the Trump campaign (according to the Mueller report). Furthermore, Rtskhiladze's contacts with Michael Cohen represent some of the few Russia–Trump campaign links that exist, and his name is prominent due to the mention of "tapes". One of the footnotes regarding his interview is still redacted by Grand Jury. One https://eurasianet.org/along-with-russian-collusion-mueller-report-probes-georgian-consonants Central Asian outlet even made an article about pronouncing his name right, and Rtskhiladze is currently disputing parts of the footnote mentioning the alledged tapes (https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/05/08/who_were_the_mueller_reports_hired_guns.html article from two days ago). I believe he does not fall within  because his presence in the report is substantial enough, because he does not qualify as  and due to him also not attempting to keep a low profile (https://twitter.com/bloombergtv/status/1121485306660818945 Bloomberg interview
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:LOWPROFILE)

Comment: Fails notability. "If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." This is further explained in |Subjects notable only for one event. He is identified in the article as a co-owner of the Silk Road Transatlantic Alliance, but there is nothing about his role in the company and the company itself fails notability. Otherwise, his only coverage in the media has been because he objected to a footnote in the Mueller report. So he's sort of like a footnote to a footnote of history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Not otability (people)|notable. Everything in the article equals |"nothing" but run-of-the-mill stuff including the events in the ''Role in development of Trump Towers in Georgia'' section. The one "claim to fame" would be the exchanged text conversation with Donald Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen that was included in the  Mueller Report. This would be the  that seems |feigned as not clear. Without this there is nothing "worthy of notice". If it is kept it will just amount to Trump drama junk. Just being associated with Trump or mentioned in a report does not convey notability which is not OTINHERITED|not inherited. The !votes, that the subject "appears 27 times in the Mueller report", a primary source as indicated by the relisting comments, does not advance notability "of the event" so the !votes are |negated as non-persuasive reasoning that the subject is "prominent enough" for an article just on those grounds. ''"Trump's itchy Twitter finger"'' would likely be more notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MILL||WP:BLP1E||WP:ICANTHEARYOU||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:JUSTAVOTE)