Deletion of Think Africa Press (2nd nomination)

Comment: It's always difficult to establish the notability of a news resource, as they aren't often discussed in depth by other news resources. I tend to agree with the essay otability (media) that being frequently cited by other reliable sources helps to establish notability, and Think Africa Press are fairly frequently cited. Granted, mostly by the Guardian, but I think their involvement in the "global development blogosphere" means that they are "considered by reliable sources to be authoritative in their subject area", another of the notability criteria suggested in that essay. A marginal case, perhaps, but I think they just about scrape through
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: To me this is probably promotional. The question hinges on whether or not the slim coverage by The Guardian is sufficient to establish notability. I would say not, since I couldn't find anything else. IOW, there are no ''multiple'' sources of independent coverage. This might be a case of  perhaps, but right not I'm not seeing it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)