Deletion of AWS Truepower (3rd nomination)

Comment: Meets ; enough coverage exists to meet . Some source examples are listed below. Note that the sources below are ''not'' press releases, as evidenced in part by utilizing Google searches using the ''titles'' of these article, in which links are only present for these articles themselves, as opposed to press releases, which typically have the same article hosted on various websites. Full disclosure: I closed the first AfD discussion as an uninvolved user, but this does not preclude me from participating in this new AfD discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: per ; the content is strictly advertorial. Separately the article has had |plenty of chances for improvement after two AfDs, but this has not occurred. If this company was indeed notable (of which I'm not convinced), than an editor independent of the topic will likely create the page some time in the future. There's no rush to reach such a state, however
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:CHANCE)

Comment: Article and sources do not establish establish notability per guidelines. Fails  and basic  as subject has not received  "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Current sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)