Deletion of Popeye's Chicken Sandwich

Comment: with Popeyes, 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: to Popeyes as per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Sandwich is certainly generating enough coverage to merit its own article. It was launched earlier this month, and it is https://abcnews.go.com/US/man-sues-popeyes-missing-chicken-sandwich/story?id=65292396 still generating coverage today, 18 days later. Yes, the lawsuit is absolutely frivolous, but the fact that a  is reporting such a frivolous lawsuit means that that the sandwich meets notability. The only reason to merge to Popeye's would be if there is no reason to believe that the article could not be developed beyond a stub. I don't think that's the case. Given that the template for the sandwich already has partial nutritional information, and I expect it to be completely filled out over time, I don't see how this nutritional information would fit in the Popeye's article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I would like to say that I went to  and if you read it correctly it states that newsworthy events should not be included. This is not a newsworthy event. This is an item that is receiving a lot of coverage. Hence from my interpretation  wouldn't be relevant and you should look at the sandwich as an item that is receiving news coverage. Also given each of these franchises are going to reply with new offerings and the amount of taste tests that will be done over the Great Chicken Sandwich wars that are to come, this will be in the news for quite some time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Primarily per , but also because it's not really the sandwich itself which appears to have generated most of the coverage - from what I've read, most of the coverage seems to be about the success of the company's viral marketing campaign, and its rivalry with another firm. I feel that this would be better contextualised within the article on the Popeyes, rather than in a separate article about the sandwich, which does not appear notable to me in and of itself. I don't think we want too much of this content merging into the main article, which already covers this briefly with good sources; it could perhaps be expanded upon a little, but we don't need the trivia in there. I'll note that there is currently a typo in the position of the apostrophe in the title, which should either be after the s, or omitted altogether (I guess we could have redirects from all three, as plausible search terms
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)