Deletion of Gary Null

Comment: It was proper to bring this to AfD, although a much better explanation for why it ought to be deleted is necessary, as the article itself asserts notability. However, the real notability might not be what is asserted in the article, but more to do with the controversy surrounding this person. That is not to say the article does not have serious problems. Most of the templates (i.e. POV, verification, etc.) on it are merited. Most of it is |unverified - I don't think I can believe much is what is being said in the article. In fact, there's no reason why much of the unsourced or improper material has to remain during this discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)