Deletion of Spinagon

Comment: to Devil (Dungeons & Dragons). No independent sources to provide notability per , and I'm dubious that significant coverage in  exists. Probably not significant enough to warrant its own article, but probably deserves mention in the Devil article. Credible search term for anyone looking for the D&D creature
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: without prejudice to merge/redirect to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters). Article fails . This is a creature from D&D and all the sources being component of the D&D game, they are |primary sources on the subject without which the creature just would not exist. They are not |secondary sources which would provide "analytic or evaluative claims" on primary sources, and since the creature is from D&D, the D&D sources are "works produced by those affiliated with the subject or its creator" thus not independent. A search in http://www.google.com/search?q=%22spinagon%22&btnG=Search+Books&tbm=bks&tbo=1 Google Books and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22spinagon%22&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= Google Scholar only yieled the same kind of primary sources, so the creature is highly unlikely of every being notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PSTS||WP:PSTS)