Deletion of Covenant Reformed Baptist Church

Comment: The chruch's scope and coverage are entirely local, thus failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Every church in the land will have similar local coverage, but that doesn't make every small independent church notable, according to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I have carefully checked the otability (organizations and companies) guidelines.  So far as non-commercial orgs. are concerned their scope either must be national or international or, when local, they become notable "if there is substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area."   The evidence provided for coverage falls far short of this requirement.  The Caswell Messenger is clearly local and the Biblical Recorder, with its scattered distribution and specialist focus does not constitute substantial evidence for coverage by reliable independent sources (plural) even if it qualifies as one source, which I doubt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per , purely local church with no specific notability presented.  It's also extremely poorly written, reading much like a brochure and you can tell they were getting pretty desperate to figure out stuff to say about it, eventually just giving up and tossing in any ol' trivia, such as where the pastor went to school(!) and what ages of kids are allowed to use the gym(!!!).  I swear I'm not making this up, it really is all in there, to the point that it's actually comical.  Luckily they stopped before tossing in how many spaces are in the parking lot or what brand of toilet paper they use.  My absolute favourite part is the bold claim that "''We don't believe in segregated churches''", which would have been quite progressive in the 50s but this church has only existed since 2008
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Looking at , one of the criteria for a non-profit organization to be notable is that its activities should have national or international scope. This is a local church operating at a local level, so it fails that criterion. Others have already noted the lack of breadth of coverage. I agree with that: the coverage in two newspapers local to the church is not sufficiently broad coverage, and regardless of the exact polity of the NC Baptist Convention, ''The Biblical Recorder'' is not independent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: with regret. Unlike Starblind, I don't find the page amusing. The citations are sufficient for erification but not for notability, as  says "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, national, or international source is necessary". Given the specialist scope and related-party interest of the Baptist Recorder, I don't think it counts as a regional source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:ORG)

Comment: Local church with no indication of the kind of notability needed to pass . The articles in multiple local community newspapers are not in themselves enough to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Non-notable church, lacking in any real coverage outside the local area. Article is heavily promotional, primarily edited by one user, Yeoberry, with an apparent  and whom insists on trying to spam everyone who votes delete here, with a mixture of poor understanding of policy and borderline personal attacks (accusing people of making "a statement of a falsehood" is pretty borderline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)