Deletion of Vanessa Chase

Comment: Doesn't pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: on the grounds that the rationale given by the nom could be used as precedent to have articles based upon porn stars eliminated from Wikipedia ("articles like this one"). At the moment all other considerations are invalid. I don't want to see this precedent set. If you want articles on adult entertainers banned from Wikipedia, push for a policy to address this via  and . Although I feel this individual is notable within her Genre and I believe may have some awards under her belt, no prejudice to a relisting with a rationale that does not smack of . If there is BLP-violating material, then by all means remove it; don't wait for an AFD. (The fact she is/was a porn actress, however, is not BLP-violating in any way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PORNBIO||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Despite all that, and the lack of clear articulation in the nomination, this actress appears to fail .  No major awards/feature appearances, no groundbreaking films, blockbusters, or genre establishments, and no mainstream news coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: The nomination is flawed, but the lack of general notability or specific  notability is manifest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: per the nominator, the lack of non-trivial coverage of this  subject is troublesome
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)