Deletion of The High Learys (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm not going to vote as that is going to be my new policy I believe for articles I approve. I will comment and say this though. This was a borderline accept for me, going by the guideline that an article could survive AfD 50% of the time. The nogusta article and murdoch sources were the selling point for me, but just barely. Might still be a case of . My concern is, if greater sources can't be found, that this page would face inherent bias in re-creation if it fails two AfDs. I would just ask either way that it be a soft delete. As the creation of it was done through the proper channels, and there's no reason that the page should be potentially salted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: whilst not the most clear-cut it does satisfy  criteria 1 & 4
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)