Deletion of This Is Anfield

Comment: per nom and . No assertion on notability of website or verification of claims made. Fan sites are two-a-penny (especially for a big club like this), and I can't see why this site is more notable than any of the others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No reliable sources that show notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: No different in terms of notability from number of other fansites. Another one faced a similar scrutiny Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anfield Online|not so long ago. And in what sense is the article well sourced? Only primary sources are mentioned with no third party inclusion. The sources mentioned above merely ''mention'' the website and the BBC uses it as an external link. That doesn't satisfy . ''Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|Leave
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)