Deletion of Prout patet per recordum

Comment: There is more to this topic than translating this phrase from Latin to English.  The correct inclusion of the phrase in legal pleadings and other matters was essential.  Use some other phrase such as ''hoc paratus est verificare'' and your case was toast.  There are extensive legal works which discuss these fine points of jurisprudence which are almost as complex and baffling as Wikipedia's volumes of policies.  The topic should therefore not be deleted purely on the basis of some blanket prejudice against Latin phrases.  In the case of ''requiescat in pace'' referred to above, I found that there was plenty of scope to write upon such matters given time to properly research them and this is the thrust of our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: Prout patet per recordum'' to a listified version of List of legal Latin terms, as this is |especially obscure; I've been lawyer for 17 years and I've never seen the phrase.  No comment on the others legal Latin phrases, but I'd lean towards '''keeping''' all of those
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to a listified version of List of legal Latin terms, and merge the other stubs listed there likewise. That would make them part of a technical glossary, which is an acceptable form of list per #Wikipedia is not a usage guide, which states in its last paragraph that "Some articles are Wikipedia:Lists#Types of lists|encyclopedic ''glossaries'' (i.e., more than simply lists of dictionary definitions) on the jargon of various industries and fields; such articles must be informative, not guiding in nature, because #GUIDE|Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook." Keeping this article as a permastub is not helpful, since it does not appear that much more than this one sentence can be said about this phrase
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:NOT)