Deletion of Athar Siddiqui

Comment: Sources presented in the article do not amount to in-depth coverage and are heavily dependent on a single source, Times of India. The coverage seems minor. I can't speak to the roles performed, but after looking at each article listed above - the features appear to list a significant number of actors, among which Siddiqui is not especially standing out - our own coverage of him does not indicate significance of roles performed, so I do agree that this presently fails . Source search, particularly  turns up mostly Times of India, which is noted in  "to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable." In this case, I would say the standard for notability demands more in-depth coverage than shown currently - I'm not seeing evidence of passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:RSSE||WP:RSP||WP:GNG)

Comment: As per  (#1) policy. The actor has played a significant role in multiple notable productions as listed in the article and those claims are well sourced with reliable sources. Special:Contributions/42.106.216.188|42.106.216.188
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)