Deletion of Robert Scheurwater

Comment: Unable to establish that SA Web Award is notable. The only mention it seems to get is from sites stating that they've been awarded one &ndash; no press coverage or critical commentary. The http://www.webawards.co.za/main.php?rdid=0&g=3 FAQ doesn't instill much confidence &ndash; just by creating an account with the site, anyone can "participate in the website review process." An award where anyone can help judge is going to struggle to be taken seriously. Couldn't find anything else that would help him meet the  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Like I said notable is notable no matter what anyone says, thinks,and cares and national awards fall under notability. I have already send the South African Web Awards an email about this and that they should start an article on Wikipedia. I have already made a start for them they will update the winner list on Monday. Google news??? There are website confirming that I have won the awards. In write most of it myself, so that the article explains and people understand the notability Wikipedia:BIO#Failure_to_explain_the_subject.27s_notability, so Wikipedia:Conflict of interest is not a valid tag, because I wrote most of it myself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There is no article for the South African Web Award (and based on my failure to find any hits for it in Google news, there should be no article). This is a non-notable award that does not convey notability, and as discussed above, even if it did convey some notability it would be primarily on the web site. Google news also fails to find any hits for Scheurwater himself, so he fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)