Deletion of Press freedom and the Occupy movement

Comment: Well-documented. The synthesis has been made by Reporters without Borders, and their Press Freedom Index 2011/2012, including the precipitous drop of the US due to the Occupy media suppression, has been reported on by independent reliable sources, such as the http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2018110475_apusworldfreedomofthepress.html ''Seattle Times'', and even http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/05/01/report-press-freedom-holds-steady-worldwide/ Fox News! Merging this information to Occupy movement or Freedom of the press in the United States would only create versions of these articles that scream for a |spinout. &nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:spinout)

Comment: Unreleated snippets properly covered in the relevant articles, used here as a strange POV fork exercise of no long-term encyclopedic value.   Also some of the sourcing is not actually  in the first place, or does not even support the claims made.  Vide http://reesenews.org/2011/11/13/column-my-first-hand-account-of-todays-arrest/26969/ used for the claim "Two journalists were arrested: Katelyn Ferral, of The News & Observer, and Josh Davis, a graduate student in Journalism at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill"  wrtieen by one of the "journalists",  arrested for obvious distructive "occupation" of a private building ("see Trespass), with the really big claim being ''A man told me that I “missed a pretty awesome dance party” in the space the night before, when they first occupied the building.''   I rather think that an "awesome dance party" is not actually a part of a "protest" nor does enforcing trespassing laws amount to "opposing press freedom." .   When such cruft makes its way into such a "list", I suggest the list itself is cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Lambiam, as |well-documented in multiple, |reliable sources.  Besides, it is plainly not a list, but rather a series of incidents written in prose.  Also, this does not fall under |news; the text and citations cover several months.  Finally, |weird is arguably a valid outcome at WP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ODD)

Comment: While interesting, and probably important, this seems more like  and .  The Occupy movement already has plenty of articles here, as does Freedom of the press in the United States. Important info here, or that would be added, should be placed there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:OR)

Comment: The original research and synthesis problems with this article are pretty clear and obvious to any ''neutral'' reader.  Until there are true |secondary sources which discuss this topic, this article needs to go away.  Alternately, it might be appropriate to merge some of the better-sourced incidents to Law enforcement and the Occupy movement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: The article consists of whatever events editors have thought relevant to the topic. The criteria for inclusion in the list also appears to be arbitrary and decided by what an editor deems to involve "press freedom". Completely  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN)