Deletion of LG Chocolate (VX8600)

Comment: WP:N|notability is a guideline and it is quite appropriate to cite it in AFD debates. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion says  "Arguments commonly used to recommend deletion are: "unverifiable" (violates ), "original research" (violates ), and "non-notable" in cases where the subject does not meet their respective notability criteria." I was at a FedEx store today and saw a bin for recycling cell phones. It was about half full (a pessimist would say half empty) of cell phones. That makes me reflect on whether each model of cell phone now or ever sold is really inherently notable as some feel. Notability is permanent, so it would extend to every model ever sold. Why not then every model of Hoover vacuum cleaner, or every model of refrigerator sold by every vendor? They would be equally verifiable, they were also heavily used and heavily promoted, and they generally cost more and lasted longer
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR)

Comment: Why do you believe that wide-spread use establishes notability? I can find no mention of this criteria at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I ''did'' say weak keep and that it ''could'' be notable. I don't see that  is a hard definition of notability. I have seen many articles kept that I don't think are notable per the guidelines myself. Convincing others is the tough part
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)