Deletion of Trinity City Hotel

Comment: since subject lacks notability per . The article was created by a |kamikaze account, which never helps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILDING||WP:SPA)

Comment: per nom. In terms of  and , there is only limited coverage of the subject available. If we exclude all of the hotel reviews from the news sources, the only coverage (of which the subject is the primary topic) that I can find are https://www.irishexaminer.com/business/john-malones-trinity-city-hotel-in-dublin-records-785k-profit-376958.html these https://www.fft.ie/trinity-city-hotel-profits-up-54/19128 types of profit notices. Which are fairly typical types of coverage expected for similar businesses, and do not in themselves establish notability. Per the nominator, the bulk of the content seems to be attempting to assert notability based on loose connections with unrelated subjects (like the street on which the hotel sits, or the person/people after which the street is named, or that the fire brigade or other businesses which previously occupied parts of the building). This is problematic based on  and related guidelines. In short, despite (or perhaps because of) my attempts to improve the quality of this article, I do not see how the subject is any more notable than the 800 other hotels in Dublin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORGCRIT||WP:INHERITORG)