Deletion of List of sexually active popes (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOBODYCARES)

Comment: The topic the popes' sexlife is notable, as it is written books about it. It is issues with the article, as the heading and the section "Background" is poorly sourced, and may contain original reaseach. NPOV is may also affected. This is, however, no reason to delete the article (), as it could be improved by ordinary editing. I find the use of a list ok, as the criterias for inclusion is used in the articles heading
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDL)

Comment: I have not been convinced by the arguments that have been advanced for deletion thus far.   applies to lists of disconnected, miscellaneous, information within articles (not articles which are themselves lists).  The subject of Popes accused of sexual improprieties has been extensively discussed in a variety of published works such as ''Sex Lives of the Popes'' and ''Vicars of Christ'' by Peter de Rosa, so  is not a convincing argument.  I am also not convinced that  is a satisfactory reason for deletion.  Many of the statements made in the article are already associated with  citations.  Admittedly more citations are still needed and some specific statements may indeed be , but these are rguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Surmountable_problems|surmountable problems that can be resolved by adding further references or deleting certain problematic assertions.  However, I would support splitting the article, something along the lines of List of married popes and List of popes accused of sexual improprieties.  For example, some of these popes lived in the 9th to 11th centuries, a time not noted for its wealth of reliable and objectively written historical documentation.  It may be very difficult or impossible to provide a reliable source supporting the factual nature of an accusation, but we should be able to source the fact that an accusation was made
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:NOONECARES||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:A)