Deletion of Jayne Innes

Comment: In general, we don't regard being a parliamentary candidate as notable: she'll be notable if she wins the seat, but since it looks a bit marginal, that's by no means certain.  The article suggests is a glimmer of evidence that she may be a little more significant than other candidates, having been a member of the Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party's policy forum.  The National Policy Forum isn't all that powerful, so I wouldn't rate it as particularly significant, but it just might be an indication of a wider role in the party; ''if'' she turned out to have had a truly significant role within the party, I could reconsider my !vote, but so far I don't see any evidence of that.The references provided look impressive until studied: the http://iccoventry.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0125nwarksnews/tm_method=full%26objectid=18814437%26siteid=50003-name_page.html first is a report about her predecessor, which doesn't even mention Innes; the http://www.libdems.org.uk/party/people/mr-john-hemming.0080.html second is about the man who beat her in Birmingham, and doesn't mention her my name; the http://www.unionstogether.org.uk/resources/Britain_working_document.pdf third is a National Policy Forum document which lists her at the end as one of the hundred-plus members of the forum; the http://www.bbk.ac.uk/hca/staff/matthewinnes fourth is about her husband, and again doesn't mention her by name. requires non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable sources, but all we have here is one lone instance of her name in a list of over a hundred people at the end of a very long document. Since she clearly fails both  and , this looks to me like a strong delete, even without considering our general wariness of article on election candiates
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:N)