Deletion of Tactical reload

Comment: The subject is more than adequately covered in the sources produced above, I don't see any violation of . The reader has to know why and how something is done for the article to make sense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: while the current article is in bad shape a tactical reload is a well known concept and discussed in many books on the topic, like http://books.google.nl/books?id=m-zMuBP8sk0C&pg=PA94&dq=%22tactical+reload%22&hl=en&ei=JMGpTKG6M8eSOpyxvaAM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22tactical%20reload%22&f=false http://books.google.nl/books?id=wiiUeexIMLIC&pg=PA129&dq=%22tactical+reload%22&hl=en&ei=JMGpTKG6M8eSOpyxvaAM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22tactical%20reload%22&f=false http://books.google.nl/books?id=mwvu-am3wbcC&pg=PA230&dq=%22tactical+reload%22&hl=en&ei=JMGpTKG6M8eSOpyxvaAM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22tactical%20reload%22&f=false or any of the other 98 gbooks hits http://www.google.nl/search?q=tactical+reload#q=%22tactical%20reload%22&hl=en&prmdo=1&tbs=bks:1&source=lnms&ei=a8KpTKPjEs_rOdPkmKcM&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&ved=0CBoQ_AU&fp=54a04fce7780a5f1. The concept therefore meets the  and should not be deleted. I would also support a merge to an article like firearm loading techniques (not to be confused with handloading), but none seems to exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)