Deletion of TinyWarz

Comment: first of all, stop with the personal attacks.  They're totally unproductive, and contrary to Wikipedia policy.  Furthermore, we have ''clearly'' outlined what needs to be done - find reliable sources that assert, and support, notability for this game.  None have been produced, so this article, by Wikipedia's own guidelines, should be deleted.  Furthermore, '''read ''' before repeating this same argument.  If you think Earth 2025 should be deleted, then nominate; don't try to get this article kept because another article does not meet standards either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: this is absurd.   If you want to argue that the guidelines under  should not apply, then ''argue this on '', not here.  Guidelines are not subjective, and, yes, non-notable things do not belong on Wikipeida.  As a "newbie", perhaps you should review  and , since your suggestion violates both of these.  The article on the Vietnam War is exceedingly well document, and the topic is notable.  This article is not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:NOT)

Comment: Notability issues aside, there are still no |attributable reliable sources which actually present any sort of information. User-submitted information, minor blogs, and trivial/passing mentions are not substantial or |reliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:RS)

Comment: I think this just about summarizes the entire debate right here.  You don't understand Wikipedia policy, or it's guidelines - but frankly, you couldn't care less, because .  That's not an argument!  That's patently the most ridiculous thing I have encountered, and a singularly offensive attitude to anyone who cares about this project.  This is ''not a popularity contest''.  Your personal like or dislike has no bearing on this, and I strongly urge you to strike out all your comments if this is the rationale you have behind your argument.  This is ''not'' a vote, and outright denials of Wikipedia policy totally abuse this process and degrade the Encyclopedia as a whole
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: Sources seem to be blogs and sites that have no established reputation for fact checking. Arguments for keep seem to be . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)