Deletion of Susan Essien Etok

Comment: per . Respect77   — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:BIO and  both require sources where the person is the subject of the article - |you can't be notable just for being somone's friend. Looking at the sources, http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/aug/31/michael-jackson-doctor-defence-gutted this in the Guardian is probably the highest quality source, but only mentions Etok very briefly. Sources that are more directly about her (but still really about Michael Jackson) like http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/news/a170311/jackson-begged-british-doc-for-drugs.html this and http://www.contactmusic.com/news/doctor-took-pill-boxes-from-jacksons-hotel-suite-pharmacy_1113697 this are based off interviews that Etok gave to tabloid sources such as ''The Mirror'' and ''Entertainment Tonight'' - not what we want to be using as sources for BLPs or to establish notability. None of the references in the 'Early life and career' section are sufficient to establish notability and  is clearly not met either - she has an h-index http://www.journalogy.net/Author/19436826/susan-essien-etok of 2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INHERIT||WP:PROF)

Comment: There is no actual claim for notability in light of , re Michael Jackson. Even the webpages and tabloid sources that named her solely in relation to Jackson's passing don't clear . Also,  is not satisfied, as indicated above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:PROF)

Comment: From the sources on her article, meets the GNG.  Likely meets cademic based on her http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?q=SE+Etok&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 Google Scholar results, which '''also''' back up her scientific credentials
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)