Deletion of Winter of 2010–11 in Great Britain and Ireland

Comment: Whatever about the other articles listed, I don't think it is accurate to state that the subject of the article under discussion here (UK/IE Winter 2010) was an "ordinary winter". As per a number of reliable sources (not synth) in the https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/dec/20/why-so-cold-winter UK and https://www.irishtimes.com/news/low-of-16-degrees-recorded-in-coldest-winter-for-47-years-1.630131 Ireland, it was considered an unusual phenomenon then. Meeting . And has been the subject of https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate/uk/interesting/dec2010 analysis and https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-northern-ireland-35000128/reliving-the-cold-spell-of-winter-2010 retrospective https://www.rte.ie/archives/2015/1215/753759-weather-conditions-snow-and-ice/ since. Meeting . I absolutely agree that the article needs improvement. In particular to remove the "daily weather report" style structure and the uncited "weather stats" that are peppered throughout. Both of which, per nominators note, fail "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of stats" and "Wikipedia is not the news and weather" norms. But I cannot support a deletion. As the subject itself meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LASTING||WP:GNG||WP:LASTING)