Deletion of Bob Tweedy

Comment: per nom. Doesn't meet ,  or related guidelines. For example, neither of the main papers of record in Ireland (https://www.irishtimes.com/search/search-7.4195619?q=%22Bob+Tweedy%22 IT and https://www.independent.ie/search/?fromSection=ece_frontpage&search=%22Bob+Tweedy%22+waterford IN&M) have any history of coverage of the subject directly. (There are one or two things about his businesses going into administration/etc. But nothing where he is the main subject of the coverage). The same is true of the handful of links which were added to stave off the original PROD tag. (The linked articles do not cover the subject. They cover the subject's businesses. And, at that, only one very limited element of those businesses). That the article seems to have been https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bob_Tweedy&oldid=87335809 initially created as some form of attack page (or a joke?) is also a significant concern. Mine is a very firm delete recommendation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)