Deletion of Chessckers

Comment: Very much under .  Note to Yummysalad, Dyingpossum, and Funnybunnies (the latter two of whom are evidently SPAs and possible socks), please divert your attention to  for a nice long list of arguments that are best avoided here.  In short, it actually is hurting Wikipedia's integrity, that it exists is not enough (case in point, I exist), that it is evidently fun and/or "awesome" and that you've played it before is not enough either.  Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:AADD)

Comment: does not appear |notable. No , so must be 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: appears totally non-|notable, and was probably |made up one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NFT)

Comment: WP:V, , , and  concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: I hate to cite my credentials, but I worry that the message isn't yet clear.  I'm an amateur expert on chess (as my contributions will demonstrate) and I know a thing or two about checkers also.  I've never heard of "chessckers."  It's the kind of chess variant that was |made up in school one day.  Just because a few kids have played it, doesn't make it notable.  Until I see at least one citation from any of the publications in List of chess periodicals (which I wrote) or works of equivalent quality, I will be very disappointed if Wikipedia gives its stamp of approval to this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: unsourced, see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: as a .  Rules don't appear standardized, and the only other ''Chessckers'' Google hit gives a completely different ruleset (which isn't reliable either.)  Also, I posted an example within an article that indicates an undefined portion of the rules - is the game a draw or loss?  Given that these questions are unlikely to be resolved, I wouldn't consider it notable enough for a chess variant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)