Deletion of Sir George Dick-Lauder, 12th Baronet

Comment: notable baronet, in my opinion meets   —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as he appears to be |notable per , but more |cites would help |rescue this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:HEY)

Comment: to Lauder Baronets, as I did http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lauder_Baronets&diff=154157836&oldid=140530649 here with another non-notable Lauder Baronet, viz. Sir Andrew Dick-Lauder, 6th Baronet, and have today done to to Piers Lauder (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piers Lauder|the AfD). I agree with the nominator's assessment of Sir George Dick-Lauder, 12th Baronet as non-notable, but I would oppose to simply deleting the article. The article on the baronetcy itself is clearly notable per  (referenced in multiple sources), and demonstrates holders of the title played a significant roile through over a dozen generations. Per , there is no need to constrain the length of Lauder Baronets, so I have gone ahead and merged, an action which does not require AfD approval.  However, I have not replaced the article Piers Lauder with a redirect, because AFAICS that should not be done until this AfD is closed
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PAPER)