Deletion of The Enigma Project

Comment: Meets . By having review on http://www.josaka.com/Reviews/2006/The-Enigma-Project-000706.htm and also on BBC which is reputable source. http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2005/06/01/localband_enigmaproject_feature.shtml and also http://www.bbc.co.uk/berkshire/content/articles/2006/11/29/enigma_project_christmas_party_feature.shtml
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Failure of . Band manager should not be involved in writing articles about his own band - that's self-publicity and an obvious conflict of interest. Read 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:NPOV)

Comment: fails  as it stands, potential to pass in future, so everybody just chill and hang out until they do. Very disappointing continued |personal attacks on the nominator and other editors. Advice: don't sour people who might be inclined to support you if you behaved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:NPA)

Comment: As it stands at present, the ''article'' contains no claim to notability per  or . If properly sourced, I would be minded to review. Also '''delete''' Astronaut/Microcosm. —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:BAND)

Comment: fails . If they're almost on the borderline, well, then wait until they pass it and then recreate the article. M:Wiki is not paper|Wiki is not paper -- it's exceedingly easy to recreate content once its topic becomes notable according to our applicable criteria. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: WP:MUSIC, and also  as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)