Deletion of Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp

Comment: Nom is reminded of . While being a CDC branch chief does not make somebody notable, this is not generally a position given to obscure scientists. Looking at GScholar, we see that her most-cited article was cited over 1000 (THOUSAND!) times, the second one over 600 times, the third one over 400 times. That's over 2000 for those three papers alone. That's not "fairly widekly quoted", that's exceptionally highly quoted and a clear meet of #1. I notice that the nom is new here, so I would recommend that they familiarize themselves more with WP policies and guidelines before nominating further articles for deletion. I strongly advice the nom to withdraw this proposal, to save the community time. In addition, this nomination seems to be "collateral damage" from an edit war on Sweet Briar College and a |more collaborative approach to editing WP is highly desirable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BATTLEFIELD)