Deletion of Joost vandebrug

Comment: Subject meets '''|GNG''' and '''|CREATIVE #3''' criteria (''the person has created a well known work that has been subject of multiple independent reviews'') -Sources, -http://www.dazeddigital.com/photography/article/17637/1/the-lost-boys-of-bucharest, http://www.port-magazine.com/feature/the-lost-boys/, http://www.huckmagazine.com/perspectives/reportage-2/romania-orphans/, http://www.b365.ro/cinci-lei-proiect-fotografic-emo-ionat-al-unui-englez-despre-copiii-strazii-din-bucure-ti_208300.html, http://www.vogue.it/magazine/notizie-del-giorno/2014/03/lost-in-paradise, http://www.vogue.it/en/talents/a-short-film-with/2011/09/silvio-betterelli-. I guess, nominator in their first sentence of afd rationale wanted to point out quite a few unnecessary web links that lead to no where but home page and in turn doesn't help to verify anything or establish notability. In second and last sentence of their rationale, they have raised a concern over notability that I think, should have been addressed by now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)