Deletion of Daniel Chong

Comment: Yes, this is a .  It should not be a biography, but a section in the article about the relevant '''prison or jail'''.  But ''what'' prison?  I've read half a dozen news reports that carefully omit any mention of where this "holding cell" is located.  My wild guess is it's a private prison and some Corporate Powers That Be have lobbied the newspapers, but we'll see (well, wild).  Sooner or later somebody will find us a link to the court filing and we can do what the press is too corrupt to, namely, lay this burden on the proper doorstep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: https://news.google.com.au/news/story?q=Daniel+Chong&hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft:en-au:IE-Address&rlz=1I7SUNC_enAU361&prmd=imvnsuo&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&biw=1600&bih=805&wrapid=tlif133604781684410&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=duek_-20fY82IwMDCXtrrXvrvn6nM&ei=zniiT4SYBaj-mAXUs9SKCA&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CCoQqgIwAA Significant coverage wp:v|corroborates the wp:bio|notability that has been asserted; however we must remember 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: for . HOwever, I agree with Dru that this story may have legs, in which case I'll change my vote to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)