Deletion of Villa Kamogawa

Comment: I am convinced by Novem's analysis of the sources, as being either |primary or |promotional, which violate Wikipedia's |guidelines for organizations. The additional sources that Planetdust mentioned above are mostly brief mentions of the organization in stories or promotions of other connected things, and they only prove |existence and not notability. I can find nothing else that satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NCOMPANY||WP:EXIST)

Comment: The German sources that are openly accessible provide marginally |significant coverage.  Some of the German sources are firewalled; they either improve the coverage or don't make any difference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: for failing  and .  This is the ''English language'' encyclopedia yet all of the sourcing is in German or Japanese.  Verifiability is cumbersome at best. Those who don't read these languages have to run the citations through machine translations. While these translations can sometimes be amusing at best they only give the reader a general sense of the subject matter.  I ran "Villa Kanogawa" through a search engine only came up with hits from booking sites.  If the supporting citations are only in German or Japanese that suggests the subject lacks broad geographic coverage.  In a nutshell, it fails  based on lack of verifiability and significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:GNG)