Deletion of RINET

Comment: It's useful" is one of those |arguments to avoid. I'm more concerned about whether or not the article meets . By all appearences, it does not. The activities are not national or international in scope. The group's size and achievements are lacking. No verifiable information from reliable independent sources is provided. That's more important here than being "useful".—Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:ORG)

Comment: I don't think that the subject fails .  But shame on the authors for creating a blatant piece of advertising.  They even refer to it as "our organization" within the article.  To save the article, it would require serious attention from editors who are '''not''' involved with the subject organization.  As it stands it is blatant .  (However, I am assuming that the creators had good intentions when they created the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:COI)