Deletion of Public Art in Public Places

Comment: With the article's lack of notability all but settled, I'd like to address whether PAPP is a reliable, cite-able secondary source as well as the question of . The problem with establishing the former is the lack of transparency and vetting. Looking at https://www.publicartinpublicplaces.info/ PAPP's official site, I don't see what I'd expect to see to confidently link to it. The claim is that PAPP "collaborates with with local governments, news media, technology firms, and arts and cultural organizations to provide free and accessible public art information as a public benefit." But other than Google, none of these are named. There's no history of the project. No endorsements from institutions or experts. As established above, there's no press coverage. The Director, a "social ecologist", has a one-sentence bio and no other online presence I can find. Do you see the problem
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:LINKSPAM)

Comment: fails , only passing mentions in articles about other topics. No significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I think once this discussion is complete |that issue needs to be addressed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: After searching online, I could not find anything except social media such as Pinterest "pins", Facebook postings, and a LinkedIn entry. The articles in the references are on the artist's works, not on the organization itself, and notability is  from the artists whose works are in their database. Fails  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NCORP)