Deletion of SocialCred

Comment: promotional and fails to meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)

Comment: with no prejudice against draftification and requiring  in case this really takes off, but that's doubtful). The  sources listed above are glorified press releases.  The existing sources in the article really aren't any better.  One of them was written by a member of the company too.  The first paragraph of the first source (from ''The Sun'') reads: {{tq2|The Lagos-based startup, which celebrated its third year anniversary earlier in May is reputed for providing brands and individuals with the people, products and platforms they need to effectively connect with their target audience.}} Holy PR-speak, Batman!{{snd}}that disqualifies it from establishing notability on its face.  Everything here is the result of a media blitz by the company and doesn't establish notability.  |Wikipedia is not a PR mouthpiece. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC||WP:THREE||WP:NOT)

Comment: Per , anything promotional should be removed. However, with sources indicated by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Meh,  is a rather odd suggestion for a new article which has not ever been recreated. And the word "glorified" is a rather odd adjective to use as well. A simple  shows much more non-trivial independent RS, like Business Day (Nigeria)|Business Day https://businessday.ng/opinion/article/how-socialcred-might-just-have-gamified-the-experience-of-becoming-an-influencer/ 1, Techeconomy https://techeconomy.ng/2020/06/plaqad-launches-socialcred-africas-first-social-media-clout-ranking-app/ 2, Vanguard (Nigeria)|Vanguard https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/08/socialcred-shows-why-micro-influencers-might-be-getting-more-nods-over-mega-influencers/ 3
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:BEFORE)