Deletion of Joseph R. Rios III

Comment: I note the original speedy deletion of this article which to my mind was correct on the basis of a violation of  and  and that this article has now been given a chance through this process - nevertheless in my opinion it should be deleted at this time, as per the nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:1E)

Comment: Fails . Unfortunately there is lots of violence in the world, every day. This |single event is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: It's |SNOWing and any passing admin can delete this now...7 editors in good standing have already given arguments for deletion, and the only person contesting is the article's creator. I won't delete it myself because I participated in the discussion above, but the consensus to delete is clear. Plus, the content has already been merged to List of cases of police brutality
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per  and #NEWS. See also Ronnie Holloway about the same incident, also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Holloway|at AfD here. Even if they were combined into a single article about the ''incident'', it would fail #NEWS: "''Wikipedia considers the historical notability of persons and events.''" This sort of incident is regrettable but not uncommon, and it is not historically notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: textbook . Will anyone remember this in two years' time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)