Deletion of Esperanto and Ido compared

Comment: unsourced |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: the strangely titled article is a product of Wikipedia:Summary style, derived from the featured article Ido. These two languages are really comparable, were often compared (i.e. no ) and their comparison is useful in order to understand the development of constructed languages around 1900. - On the other side this AfD looks really like a , probably related with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ido and Novial compared. But we should not punish otherwise reasonable articles for it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POINT)