Deletion of Kate Garvey

Comment: Subject of the article does not appear to meet notability guidelines .  The article seems have been created to describe her as the wife of Jimmy Wales, so maybe merging some of the content into the section of his article about his personal life might make sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: basically per The Devil's Advocate above. This isn't a straightforward case of BLP1E - there's plenty of sources mentioning her in various contexts over the years. However, there's nothing that could be called significant coverage of her, and taking together I don't think it adds up to notability at this time. The claims to notability in the article, once the puffery is ignored, aren't all that remarkable; the only real basis for it here is her links with notable people, and creating an article on such a basis is discouraged by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Per OP and Giant Snowman. Obvious case of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:POINT)

Comment: based mostly on her tenure as a powerful Diary Secretary (which is why re-directing to Jimbo is inappropriate). Looking up someone obscure (the WP is littered with obscure sports stars from the 1920s, etc) and drawing a blank ''is'' worse than having around some borderline notable entries. . It is likely true that the article was created in response to that line in the NYT magazine (I had the exact same thought - it's as if the reporter was issuing a challenge), but so what? The question ought to simply be whether or not she's notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PAPER)

Comment: Fails , since independent notability hasn't been demonstrated. A redirect would be ok, but not necessary, in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This shouldn't even be a discussion, notability is |not inherited, as there is nothing this person has done that is notable, apart from being married to someone semi-famous.  A "diary secretary", whatever the hell ''that'' is, to a Prime Minister would never come within spitting distance of article-worthiness, so the claim of prior ''significant'' overage is utter garbage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: fails  - hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. A few name-checks in relation to previous role in 10 Downing Street and her marriage to Wales but nothing substantial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Doesn't look like she satisfies GNG, at least not based on the references in the article. Except for the wedding articles at the bottom of the list, and discounting WEF as a primary source, none of the other articles is about her. Notability is not derived and therefore we shouldn't have an article on Garvey. She definitely does not satisfy the "significant coverage" criterion at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: a POINTy creation (editor should know better by now!), this person fails  and , no evidence of independent notability, agree with MZMcBride's suggestion to redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: to  Jimmy Wales. I have checked the sources and I am unconvinced she passes GNG.  applies
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per . Independent notability not established and surely would be if it existed.  A redirect to Jimmy's page is probably fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: In response to Robofish's comment, someone who knows everybody is notable, which was her work for the prime minister and for Freud. Now the comment, quoted from our policy page, "'''' should be applied only to biographies of Wikipedia:Who is a low profile individual|low-profile individuals." Clearly not the case here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: It's  not . Diary Secretary for Tony Blair, director at Freud Communications, 2007 Young Global Leader at World Economic Forum and married to Jimmy Wales. She was responsible for the 1994 Peter Mandelson "Bobby" gambit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP4E)

Comment: and redirect.  It is a valid search term, and there is sufficient evidence of light coverage by multiple sources, with figures now approaching the dozens, but the focus of those articles are largely about her spouse where she receives passing coverage in the process.  I think the best solution to maintain  compliance, and best serve the interests of our readers, the community, and procedures currently in place is a merge and redirect under the current circumstances
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: clear example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)