Deletion of Bitcoind

Comment: with Bitcoin. The Bitcoind article appears to be an https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=102601 attempt at a . Bitcoind is almost never discussed independently of Bitcoin, since it is the first reference implementation
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: to Bitcoin, but if there is anything worth '''merging''', I won't object. Most non-primary sources will probably discuss the dæmon in conjunction with the network it attaches to; keeping the articles separate will risk creation of a 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: BitCoin Bitcoin-Qt (per below discussion). HowardStrong, the current references are not reliable, because they come from the |primary source, bitcoin.org.  These can help provide some basic information about the program, but it cannot support the |notability of the subject, which is a necessary prerequisite for having an article on Wikipedia.  The program seems to be uniquely related to BitCoin|BitCoins, and so perhaps some of this information might be better placed there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: to Bitcoin-Qt: there's nothing to pass  for inclusion or to pass  for merge. As this software is distributed within Bitcoin-Qt, this target is more appropriate then Bitcoin. —&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)