Deletion of Quinn Ngawati

Comment: The sources present in the article, as written, are ''not'' enough to demonstrate that the topic has received the depth or breadth of coverage necessary to pass . #1 is a |user-generated database that includes all players on any rugby league team that exists at all, and is thus not a source that can assist notability; #2 is a |routine piece of human interest coverage in his ''local'' hometown newspaper, at a time when he was still only ''aspiring'' to play at any level higher than the local high school league; and #3 just namechecks his existence a single time in an article which is not ''about'' him. A person does not automatically pass GNG the moment one or two reliable sources make it possible to nominally verify that he ''exists'' — the ''context'' in which the coverage is being ''given'' still has to satisfy the subject-specific notability criterion for his field of endeavour. The sourcing shown here is simply ''not'' good enough to hand him a GNG pass, if the ''only'' source that's substantively ''about'' him is local coverage in a "local teen aspires to be famous someday" context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:USERG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: As per nom, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RLN)

Comment: Probably  Special:Contributions/86.3.174.49|86.3.174.49
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)