Deletion of Gitaka

Comment: My gut is telling me this is a  after finding no sources where this person is mentioned online. I'm not saying only online sources are valid sources, but I can only seem to locate another author by the same name who is currently still publishing as late as this year. The strange formatting of the article reminds me of  But I don't "get" what they might be spamming, I'm just drawing attention to the very odd way this article is formed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:SPAM)

Comment: At this point, I think the burden of proof has shifted. Several good faith (and above and beyond) efforts to verify this information have failed. I believe it should be deleted for failing , with no prejudice against recreation in the event that an online source is located or an editor with an established history of contribution can verify that it exists in print. I'm not keen on |discriminating against new contributors, but as it seems very plausible at this point that someone may be attempting to perpetrate a Wikipedia:Don't create hoaxes|hoax, I believe that this requirement is reasonable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BITE)

Comment: change to '''Neutral''' per discussion below). I don't think it's a hoax, it seems to be an obituary/memorial notice, probably by a relative. Unencyclopedic tone could be fixed, but no evidence of |notability, and Wikipedia is |not a memorial site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:MEMORIAL)