Deletion of International School of Gemology

Comment: I must admit: the whole page can be deleted on grounds of being non-notable. My version could be of significance for those looking for a proper gemological education but that's not a  ground. In the grand scheme of things this 'school' and its 'principle/janitor' are indeed insignificant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The above material is interesting but I went looking for |reliable sources that talk about the notability of the school -- not its principal, not any controversies in which its principal or others might be embroiled -- and found nothing that contributed to |notability.  My personal view is that the material I found would not be sufficiently |reliable to assert notability on behalf of Robert James, but that is not what we're being asked to assess here.  I was unable to establish reliably that the school, in and of itself, was notable, according to the definition of "reliable sources" given by Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:RS)