Deletion of Blake Van Leer (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails  by an astonishingly wide margin. No reliable sources (article is currently "sourced" by press releases and an entirely different person's IMDB entry, offered as someone Van Leer has "worked with"). The Cosmo exposure ("sourced" by part of a press release that does not mention Van Leer by name) was apparently some sort of "One hot guy from each of the 50 states" gimmick article so he was not the primary focus. His own resume on his http://www.blakevanleer.com/ personal website notes that the highlights of his acting career include such pivotal roles as "Boy" in the West Nottingham Academy production of "West Side Story." Plus he uses way too much product in his clearly severely damaged hair, but I suppose that doesn't really have a bearing on his Wiki-worthiness
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: does not seem likely to pass  - for instance, "Multiple features in popular culture publications
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: fails  and no new evidence presented or any real claim that he meets it. "Related to noteworthy people" is not a criterion, and no evidence that Cosmo has written about him has been presented. Perhaps he appears as a model in Cosmo ads? That is not notability. Additionally, the recreation of deleted content and the blatant |conflict of interest-gaming count against any leniency
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COI)