Deletion of Philosophy in the Dark Film Festival

Comment: The article is only 2 days old and had been tagged for a merge discussion since its very recent creation. We should consider , , and it just squeeking past the  through http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20081103/NEWS01/711039914 ''Herald Net'', http://find-it.wa.gov/?topic=QX6Gs5D5mnEK90d2V7S3Jg%3D%3D&q=cache:oyQDm2bJDncJ:www.humanities.org/grants/projectgrants.php+asian+(Americans+OR+American)+OR+asians+OR+%E2%80%9CJapanese+American%E2%80%9D+OR+%E2%80%9CChinese+American%E2%80%9D+OR+Laotian+OR+Cambodian+OR+Vietnamese+OR+korean+(populations+OR+demographics+OR+census+OR+history+OR+culture)&access=p&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&client=subject_frontend&site=default_collection&proxystylesheet=subject_frontend&oe=ISO-8859-1 ''Find It! Wahington'', and http://www.clipperonline.info/news/2008/11/07/ ''The Clipper''. If kept, the article would require ... but then, AfD is not intended to force cleanup. But why wasn't the merge discussd or considered before tossing it to AfD?  Perhaps that should have been explored first
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:PRESERVE||WP:GNG||WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: as utter failure to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)