Deletion of Michael John U. Teh (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nomination. The few sources that can be found are all |primary ones. There is no |independent, |verifiable |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NPERSON)

Comment: Not finding significant coverage beyond the 200 words in a ''Manila Bulletin'' opinion column, which leaves only non-independent (''Church News'', ''Ensign'') and not reliable ("Grampa Bill") sources, alongside a barely-rewritten PR blurb in the ''Meridian Magazine'' source (compare to ''Mormon Newsroom'' official PR: https://www.mormonnewsroom.ph/article/elder-michael-john-u-teh) that is obviously not independent. None of those count toward notability. So the subject does not appear to meet . Open to alternatives if significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources emerges, but even the article only makes claims about holding different jobs within the church, suggesting such coverage is unlikely
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)