Deletion of Biology and political orientation (2nd Nomination)

Comment: as |synthesis. This article pulls together unrelated studies and creates a new topic. If any of the studies have any notability, which is doubtful, then they can be put into their own article. We put together for example the view that there is a liberal gene and that liberal and conservative brain structures differ. If this were a field of study worthy of an article then we should be able to find a secondary source that writes about both theories. Much of the article is about the differences between liberal and conservative psychology, which is irrelevant unless the sources say that the psychological differences have a biological difference
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: spaced ndash}} because the topic absolutely passes ''''''. Examples include, but are certainly not limited to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic is a synthesis. The sourcing is completely inadequate for  and no adequate sourcing has been demonstrated. Material about Physiology and Genetics are within the field of medical research and ''are'' subject to MEDRS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: to genopolitics per Thosjleep; this article is a |content fork. Any relevant findings on this notable topic can be summarized at genopolitics and based of off |secondary sources. This is a poor quality article because it is unencyclopedic. It is mostly based off of primary sources. I found secondary sources for this topic and I posted them on the talk page
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: The topic meets  (e.g., sources already in the Wikipedia article, plus http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94764491 Could Political Views Be Driven By Biology? (NPR September 19, 2008), http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700262022/Does-biology-influence-our-political-opinions.html?pg=all Does biology influence our political opinions? (Deseret Morning News September 27, 2008), http://www.google.com/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22UNL+researchers+say+biology+shapes+political+views%22&oq=%22UNL+researchers+say+biology+shapes+political+views%22&gs_l=hp.3...945.1805.0.2022.3.3.0.0.0.0.143.322.1j2.3.0.les%3Beesh..0.0...1.1.5eyPBnvLwxA&pbx=1&fp=1&biw=1920&bih=911&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&cad=b UNL researchers say biology shapes political views (AP December 20, 2010), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00560.x/abstract Biology, Ideology, and Epistemology: How Do We Know Political Attitudes Are Inherited and Why Should We Care? (American Journal of Political Science January 1, 2012)). The article lead needs to be improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not new, and notable as noted from |such reliable sources as the ''NY Times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)