Deletion of Miss Asia Pacific World 2011 (2nd nomination)

Comment: Disruptive pointy nomination. Nomination is based on their own personal judgment about the credibility of the pageant, not on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Nominator ignores multiple articles which go beyond a passing mention and  which could very well satisfy  when the nominator considers two mere mentions of a name to be enough to show notability http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FThambipillai_Thanalakshmi&diff=533986766&oldid=533935571. Nominator goes overboard !voting keep to the extent of saying keep per relister. Gives a reason of keep because sources show music?? Claims passing GNG when no reliable sources are provided. In the face of nominators excessive inclusionism this reeks of bad faith
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)