Deletion of Housing and Urban Development Corporation

Comment: I'm glad this article has received some much needed attention. I think the added sourcing may now be enough to meet . I'm not sure a miniratna-status organization deserves defacto notability, but I do think there's enough comprehensive sourcing that's been found to deserve a keep here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: so some actually relevant sources would be: https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/hudco-cmd-m-ravi-kanth-tech-will-remove-silos-and-bring-greater-visibility-across-hudco/1147899/ | Financial express - interview, which contains a summary of purpose and technical plans before the interview; https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/09/01/stories/2004090102120800.htm| Business Line miniratna status, which covers its public sector enterprise status being given; https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/denial-of-info-due-to-lack-of-aadhaar-card-a-breach-of-rti-act-cic/story-CvCZ0doshj3qlPMTcU6OXN.html | Hindustan Times - Aadhaar card/gifts massive fines probably most reliable source, covering the fines it picks up; https://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/hudco-makes-stellar-market-debut-shares-surge-over-22/story-nMgc3R3BGZMlMBbEis4ASO.html| IPO equivalent, significant detail on going public; http://www.asianage.com/metros/mumbai/160218/mhada-winners-to-get-rs-267l-subsidy.html | Asian Times - Housing/Development loans and funding. The  notability requirements are very severe, so while the organisation would meet  I'm unsure whether it has at least two high quality (vs lots of less good) sources as required. Thoughts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG)