Deletion of Bitcoin Savings and Trust

Comment: I am a big fan of Bitcoin, and maybe this article will deserve to reappear at some point in the future once we know how the story ends, but the article as currently presented unfortunately does not pass muster and also makes an unsubstantiated allegation of crime against a named living person which falls well short of the criteria outlined in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per previous users' comments. There isn't enough coverage at the moment to meet the requirements of the WP|GNG or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Original nomination and reference to  is not valid. Even if applying  to organizations (while it is intended for people), the whole point in  is not about deleting information, it is about avoiding two articles covering essentially the same thing. Quote from : "The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person." Therefore (and as there is no other article covering event), the most which can be argued is renaming the article into description of the event (no idea how to name it, but this beyond the point; in any case renaming can and should be done outside of AfD). As for  line of arguments - three four references currently provided IMNSHO do qualify as "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" required by  (coverage is not trivial, sources are reliable, independent, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)