Deletion of Boubaker polynomials (2nd nomination)

Comment: One should note that very recently a possible  has been given, but only one, and it was not clear to me how independent the source was (to my very weak french, it read like a departmental newsletter; the source itself seems not to be such a newsletter, but perhaps it was released as "copy" by a university to the magazine; in the language of , a "press release").  At any rate, speedy deletes based on the old memory of the article, should check out the new (a day or two old) source given to support notability claim, especially those with passingly good french
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: No, but I can read the deletion comments, and everyone who !voted to delete said it wasn't notable; pretty clear to me. And if users in good faith dispute the result of the last AFD, |there is a venue for them to challenge it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)