Deletion of 2009 Obama assassination plot in Hawaii

Comment: per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per . This was a flash in the pan news story that had no lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Nominator argument amounts basically to , and so make many of the delete !votes (cfr.Mandsford) or rely on the misnaming as "plot", a problem that can be solved by moving/editing, per |deletion policy.  reminds correctly that assessing if an incident will be notable or not cannot be determined reliably just after the incident happened, therefore to be safe for now we must assume that the thing will be notable (it surely has been covered by lots of sources), unless evidence will come out of the opposite
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:ATD||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: I've not read the Hawaii one yet, and I don't have time to look into it yet because I'm about to go off for a few days for the holidays. I'll check it out when I get back and vote accordingly. However, I am the primary author of the Denver and Colorado ones, and I take exception to the fact that they have been lumped in with the Hawaii article. Both of those are well-written and well-sourced with sufficient secondary sources that are independent of the subject, which satisfies the |general notability guidelines. However, because they've been lumped together with an article that may not yet satisfy those guidelines, they are going to be getting delete votes that, in all likelihood, should only apply to the Hawaii article. Furthermore, both the Denver and Colorado articles have already been thoroughly vetted, and '''both are good articles'' (see Talk:2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver/GA1 and Talk:2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Tennessee/GA1). In fact, the Denver one is under consideration for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver/archive1|featured article, and has already been the subject of a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Barack Obama assassination scare in Denver|pointy deletion attempt, for which the result was keep. I'm trying to assume good faith here, but lumping these three articles together is simply unfair
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I think  and  both apply here for sure. As the latter states, "a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notable. Events that are only covered in sources published during or immediately after an event, without further analysis or discussion, are likely not suitable for an encyclopedia article." This subject is, at least at this point, exactly that sort of incident. Sorry, TreasuryTag, but the comparison with the JFK assassination is ludicrous
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: I think |NOTNEWS actually does apply here.  If, in the course of time, this incident becomes notable - for example, if discussion of it is sustained longer than a few days' media coverage, it could be included.  Liklihood is that it will be of very short-term interest. At the moment, it is simply not notable in its own right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: No "plot" to speak of. #NEWS issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)