Deletion of New Saxon Spelling

Comment: I'm not sure that I would categorize the sourcing as "leaves much to be improved". There's a grand total of one source for a rather long article. I agree that a lot of enthusiasm and care went into the creation of this article, however it just doesn't meet . I do agree that a short summary (based on the one source offered) at Low Saxon language might be appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)