Deletion of Paul Yarrow

Comment: looks like a pretty classic  to me.  One of the main points of BLP1E is it protects us from "guy does something wacky, gets name in paper" type articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Obvious attention-seeker, but he's managed to get himself made the subject of several news articles, and that's what  is all about. Maybe merge into an article about appearing in the background of news reports if one exists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: typical  and .  Flash-in-the-pan attention-mongers are not worthy of an eneclopedia article.  Go blog about them or setup "lookatme.wikia.com" to your heart's desire for this rubbish
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and . Funny one... Sadly, he doesn't get as much independent coverage as Jimmy Jump. I can see that all the "sources" are in fact interviews - thus |primary sources that don't account as valid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: BLP1E is not applicable because there is more than one event - 100+ appearances so far - the person in question is the primary focus of the coverage in the numerous sources supplied; and the person has also received awards and coverage for his community work.  The topic is therefore clearly notable per  and the nomination seems to be the classic  which we get in such cases, contrary to  and .  The nominator indicates that he is well aware of this person's notability as he has already noticed him himself.  The claim of non-notability is therefore absurd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:CENSOR||WP:NPOV)