Deletion of Selfconsistent electromagnetic constants

Comment: as |original synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: This appears to be an attempt at a grand |synthesis of concepts that are already covered in several Wikipedia articles. To the extent that |verifiable statements or |reliable sources in this article do not duplicate material already in other articles, they should be moved, and adapted as necessary, to the appropriate articles. However, this should not exist as a separate article in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: for reasons given; essentially that notability is , assuming it is technically correct.  This person could become a good editor, but needs mentoring, and a neutral |POV.  Faulty English is a complication, making his articles difficult to parse.  A clear and compelling summary of the need for this innovation, summarizing arguments ''referable to reliable external sources'', would address the original synthesis objection, and would help make the material more accessible if it can be provided (which I doubt, alas).  I think such a motivational summary ought to appear as an introduction, and precede the details
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:POV)

Comment: Does indeed seem to be |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)