Deletion of Global Environment Organisation

Comment: Per nom and per reasons stated in my PROD nomination ( and ).  Regardless of whether or not the world could benefit from such an organization, it does not yet exist so it can't be notable and it's process of creation (or lack thereof) is not yet noteworthy enough for inclusion on that basis.  WP should describe things that '''do''' exist, not things that ''should'' exist, regardless of how noble the intentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SOAP)

Comment: At this point, there are no sources which establish notability.  All current references in the article talk about '''a''' Global Environment Organisation, but none of them talk about '''the''' Global Environment Organisation.  Titles of references include ''"Sarkozy calls for a global organization on the environment"'' and ''"Why we need a World Environment Organization"''.  So, there is currently no "Global Environment Organisation", nor is there a solid, verifiable plan to create one.  There may be a global movement towards creating an international organization focused on environmental issues, but there is no evidence that it will be called the "Global Environment Organisation".   is clear on the inclusion of speculation and future events
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)