Deletion of ESPN MLS ExtraTime 2002

Comment: a few magazine review does ''not'' confer notability per ;  we need in-depth coverage in multiple, reliable third-party sources - which this does not have. PS the call for a 'snow keep' with the first !vote is hilarious
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets the GNG. No policy or guideline was cited as a reason to delete. Seems like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Critical reviews in gaming sites have traditionally been sufficient to meet  and there has been several AFD's where a video game article has been kept due to reviews from notable gaming sites. That said there is work that needs to be done, the reception section needs to integrate what was said in the reviews instead of simply being a list of the reviews.--Special:Contributions/174.93.160.57|174.93.160.57
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)