Deletion of Health of Donald Trump

Comment: per GNG. This is a notable subject, and the sourcing is good. Libel is not an issue here when we use published sources per . For those interested in how libel laws work in these internet days, ''Barrett v. Rosenthal'' changed everything by providing immunity from liability for the republication (not original publication) of defamatory content on the internet. Only the original publisher can be held liable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:PUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: Given the  issues, does anyone know if extra measures should be taken - perhaps changes to WP policy
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The article is unlikely to be compliant with . It is inevitably an attack on Trump
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: speculative information and possible libel in the mental health section. Most of the infomation should not be merged due to libel reasons as well as speculation per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPECULATION||WP:LIBEL)

Comment: Information that is actually confirmed should go in his main article. This is an inappropriate  full of speculation and serious  and libel concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:BLP)