Deletion of WANG Jianxin

Comment: After an extensive search using various tools, such as Worldcat, Google and various academic databases, I could not find enough to establish notability under . Does not seem to pass  either. By the way, I agree with Liontooth. I would also add that the English WP is the main/global WP, so notability should be verifiable through international sources, ideally sources that are widely available to the participants in AfD discussions. Otherwise we may fall into the trap of having to lower the standards of notability for lack of verifiable sources of notability for certain subjects. In my opinion, it is not good practice to justify a keep recommendation based on the assumption that sources of notability MAY or PROBABLY exist, for this or that subject, but are not currently available. As for their language, it certainly does not have to be English
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: I cleaned up the article, in the process (I hope) also reducing the Northwest/Northwestern confusion observed by Liontooth. Both his romanized and Chinese names get a lot of hits in Google books, but some of them are obviously not about archaeology, so I am not sure from that whether he has had the impact needed to pass  #1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)