Deletion of Moov

Comment: but improve). I believe there is enough written about this company to qualify for the |depth of coverage, but there will need to be a lot of content removed. Focus on the milestones of the company and coverage in both business publications and fitness magazines and this should not be too difficult. Just the facts; short and sweet; encyclopedic. Look at other :Category:Company stubs|stub articles for ideas
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moov&oldid=746196554 this version, which is what prompted the deletion notice, was 100% deletable per TNT.  There was a bunch of self-reversion, leaving the article like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moov&oldid=746221044 this.  Starting at that version, I cleaned this up.  If it is kept it is unclear if it should be a product article or a company article so I removed the infobox; the way I left it, it is both.   Sources I could find are poor/bloggy. Nothing in the NYT (http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/?action=click&contentCollection&region=TopBar&WT.nav=searchWidget&module=SearchSubmit&pgtype=Homepage#/moov search), nothing in the WSJ (http://www.wsj.com/search/term.html?KEYWORDS=moov search).  Found one decent ref at the LA Times that I added. Not much though. I removed the advert/cleanup tags, as this is as good as it can be made, I believe. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moov&oldid=746461534 Here is the version as I vote.  This is marginal.  So for now, delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)