Deletion of Libricide

Comment: Hopelessly POV, disorganised essay. Fails  and . We already have what looks like a perfectly good article on book burning, making this an unneccessary duplicate under a term hardly anyone uses. It's not a good sign when the first world leader the author has in their sights is George Bush- rather than, say, Hitler or Pol Pot- even though Dubya doesn't appear to be guilty of any actual "libricide". Blog post masquerading as an encylopaedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: Outside of the book ''Libricide'' by Rebecca Knuth, I cannot find any use of the term, so it violates . Every other reference on the page refers to book burning, so it should just be left at that. (I strongly think that this is just an essay based upon Knuth's book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)