Deletion of Jean-Pierre Danel (2nd nomination)

Comment: As with the immediate previous poster, I am totally disregarding the various discussions above. The ONLY relevant thing to consider is whether the subject passes the notability guidelines of the English Wikipedia, the guidelines or practices of other Wikipedias being irrelevant. I believe the subject clearly passes the notability guidelines found at  and  and thus the article should definitely be kept. However, I agree that the article needs major cleanup and needs to be purged of unreliable sources, such as Youtube, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am philosophically opposed to .  The subject meets notability standards.  If there are problems with the article's sources, the solution is to remove the problematic sources, and any statements in the article that rely on them.  If this brings the article down to a stub, fine, but if the subject is notable enough... and he is... then we should be able to find NON-problematic sources to expand it back out of the stub. Regardless... keep.  Notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: only http://www.snepmusique.com/les-disques-dor/?awards_artist=Jean-Pierre+Danel&submitAdvanced=Rechercher one album certified gold in France (not "191 gold and platinum discs" or maybe as a producer), but that is enough as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)