Deletion of Ultimate++ (2nd nomination)

Comment: as I have already voted Keep): there is a number of possibly notable non-English references: http://sdjournal.org/magazine/article/8 - two articles in printed Polish 'Software Developers Journal', issues 2005-11 and 2005-12. There appear to have been two articles in printed French journal Programmez, issues 104 and 114 http://www.programmez.com/magazine_articles.php?titre=Ultimate++-et-les-bases-de-donnees&id_article=1150&magazine=114 http://www.programmez.com/magazine_articles.php?titre=Ultimate++-et-les-bases-de-donnees&id_article=1150&magazine=104 (links summary of articles in journal with page preview). Also, links like this http://forum.codecall.net/blogs/wingedpanther/403-books-learn-c.html, while not in fact making this notable, appear to suggest that "Ultimate++" is term somebody would miss in WP. This is definitely non-notable: http://www.zwodnik.pl/index.php?id=96 or http://www.fccihk.com/files/dpt_image/5_committees/SME%20Committee/open%20source%20softwares.pdf but supports the idea that the number of similar entries is indeed limited (per ther stuff exists, compare that to the list of major StarWars characters
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: I can't find |significant coverage for this software
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)