Deletion of Dominique Strauss-Kahn sexual assault case (2nd nomination)

Comment: The size of this article gives undue weight to it as compared to other sexual assault case filed this year as it looks unlikely to proceed to trial it should be merged to   Dominique Strauss-Kahn where it should be covered in no more that two or three paragraphs. On the matter of  it is a club being used by both sides to keep out information that they don't like
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: I don't think  is applicable.  is certainly a problem, but the subject is clearly far too significant to simply delete the article. We just have to do as well as we can to balance the BLP concerns. Does anyone really expect a different result than the very recent other AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP)

Comment: The political impact this case has had is readily apparent, DSK resigned from the IMF, and did not run for the French presidency. The way the media covered the case is another aspect which is being discussed. The media coverage is not mere reporting, but consists of massive political analysis and critique, and is thus far beyond anything which  is supposed to prevent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Maintaining NPOV has been a nightmare and it will only get worse as the case proceeds if it goes to trial. I do wish users who vote "keep" would contribute to the article from time to time, if only to see what it's like. Currently the article serves no purpose other than to note the latest twists in the case that support or one other of the parties. Plainly, as Avanu says, the article repeatedly violates  and .  Another editor in the Talk has commented that an article like this shouldn't be allowed so long as BLP guidance for ongoing legal process remain so slack and I do agree
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Effects of the event went beyond DSK's personal life and reputation - it led to the selection of a new IMF director and to a shakeup in the impending French presidential election. It's also more than likely that this will be discussed and analyzed for some time, and in journals and books rather than the daily media, but even without speculating on this, it passes  (and is not NEWS) because of these national and international effects. BLP issues can be dealt with through normal editing rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: This case seems much the same as Swedish Judicial Authority v Julian Assange or Lewinsky scandal.  The nomination fails to indicate the way in which this article necessarily violates  or  - see .   The proposal to move the article into user space would not be deletion and is contrary to our |editing policy which expects us to work on articles in main space
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:IMPERFECT)