Deletion of Mark Scarborough

Comment: per  and . A shame that its original author, {{user2|Owelles99}} (whom I already told about this debate), hasn't returned to WP since last Christmas. --SlgrWikipedia:Esperanza|@ndson
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:VANITY)

Comment: The nominator does not have any valid point for deletion.   is NOT a criteria for deletion, merely for rewrite.  The fact that an article is poorly written, not NPOV, or even autobiographical, does NOT make the subject non-notable.  That all being said, this subject is non notable.  http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Mark+Scarborough%22+poet&btnG=Google+Search relevent google search of "Mark Scarborough" Poet turns up 86 hits.  Outside of a very limited geographic area, his works have not been reviewed by any reputable national press.  Even a http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22Mark+Scarborough%22&btnG=Search search of just "Mark Scarborough" turns up a smallish list of hits, mostly related to OTHER Mark Scarboroughs.  Sorry, not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO)