Deletion of Port Phillip Bay Bridge

Comment: Anyone know which of the sources might actually pass  as opposed to being primary government documents
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a legit topic as an actually historically significant proposal that still comes up from time to time, but it needs to actually document that - this guy's iteration of it is not itself notable and none of this content is actually helpful for an encyclopedia article. I am not opposed to responding with  in the case of '''the current article''' but I would be strongly opposed to any finding that it's not a notable topic should someone recreate it and do it properly
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Basically  ie .  Initial indications are notable in general re a bridge, but the current article is one of several infrastructure proposals, including a tunnel?  Articles needs to discuss all such proposals with due weight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:DUEWEIGHT)