Deletion of Bigoted woman incident

Comment: fairly clearly fails #NEWS and the test given in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:EVENT)

Comment: per #NEWS. A trivial incident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Right now, it's ONEEVENT; created too soon. It's very possible though that it will be a game-changer which ends up tipping the election out of hung parliament territory into Conservative majority. Notable much, if that happens? Trouble is, it's too soon to tell, so we're balling. Userfy or |incubate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:INCUBATE)

Comment: per  and . Passing news story; tomorrow they'll probably be talking about something else. Zero evidence of long-term notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:109PAPERS)

Comment: per nom - clear violation of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to United Kingdom general election, 2010, with perhaps a brief mention at Gordon Brown or Premiership of Gordon Brown or '''Strong Delete'''. A pretty clear example of , #JOURNALISM and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOT||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)