Deletion of List of Bratz products (2nd nomination)

Comment: Wikipedia is |neither a directory, |nor a list of indiscriminate items. This article is both and therefore needs to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: per , this is just a big list of non-notable dolls
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: per , , , , and the other delete !votes here. It's just a list without any context and without any 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:N||WP:V||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RS)

Comment: Wouldn't this section from  be enough to show that this is notable?  "The list may be a valuable information source. This is particularly the case for a structured list. Examples would include lists organized chronologically, grouped by theme, or annotated lists."  It is a structured list organized chronologically. Other than that, I really have no desire to see this on Wikipedia because it isn't something I care about.  It was also decided to be notable in the first AFD; although, I am fairly certain that is irrelevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: as wholly |unreferenced for 4.64 years and lacking any evidence of |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)