Deletion of Funding of open source software

Comment: The exact motivations for a given open source project and why it is open source are unique to the project itself.  Without scholarly sourcing of the classification defined here in, coupled with the open speculation in the article's text, is almost a textbook definition of . This article is such blatant OR that it might make sense to move it into namespace and use it as an example of OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP: OR)

Comment: I would also like to add to my above Reason for deletion, and to make sure it is noticed by people who bore of my above reason half way through. As the ultimate proof that this is complete , the entrie article, as well as many comments here imply that open source software is a Venture undertaken for no profit, that is externally funded. Open source and Free Software can both be sold for a price, produced by a corporation, whose emloyees recieve payment as part of that employment, and are entirely seperate from the monetary aspects of business. While many public project undertaken on the internet for example recieve donations or external funding, the majority of open source is not specially funded. The implication that all open source is freeware is also complete gibberish, even in terms of the rest of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)