Deletion of Eoghan Carew

Comment: General notability guideline generally overrides any of the supplemental guidelines.  Specifically, articles should not be deleted for failing one of the subguidelines if it can be demonstrated that there exists substantial coverage in reliable sources covering the person anyways.  The subject appears to pass the basic  requirements based on the level of multiple coverage seen at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Eoghan+Carew&cf=all this Google News search
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per the  failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: I don't see any multiple significant and detailed coverage, but only occasional references to his name in match reports (http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Eoghan+Carew%22&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a using quotes to keep John Carew citations off the search results). This is definitely not enough evidence to meet , and if possible even strengthen any argument for deleting the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails  as he hasn't played in a fully-pro competition. Also fails  due to no sources that assert any notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:N)