Deletion of Earthquake storm

Comment: Nom is requesting a merge, not a deletion. Merges should be discussed on article talk pages, not at AfD. {{u|J. Johnson}}, although supporting a delete here and upset by my  , did not seem to want to bring this to AfD (see Talk:Earthquake_storm#
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:DEPROD)

Comment: For a such a blatantly non-notable (and one-sourced) topic I thought a  would be sufficient. But Kvng, seeing controversy where no one else does, applied a , forcing the discussion here, where he raises these other objections. Kvng has a Special:Contributions/Kvng|history of doing this, with what looks nine or so DEPRODs so far today, and around twenty on the 20th.  He has not shown that this term "earthquake storm" has any notability in the ''seismological'' literature, nor has he proposed to "fix" the article in any way. His effort here (and elsewhere) seems to be solely to the end of obstructing the deletion of articles by making more work for others. This is not good-faith dealing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD||WP:DEPROD)