Deletion of John Alves Arbuthnot

Comment: Of the two sources cited in the article, one is a family memoir (not independent) and the other is a directory listing in a peerage guide (trivial).  Arguments of type "All X are notable," reflect a misunderstanding of the |notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Unfortunately, I no longer that it is entirely appropriate to separate the editor from the sources.  The baseline test of notability is multiple independent, reliable sources, but the originator of this article has now confirmed the only apparently independent source is in fact a self-reference back to the subject's own family. The conflation of the issues is unfortunate, but I fear that it is inevitable when there has been so much editing in breach of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: OK so the article tell us he worked for a living and had children, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to Arbuthnot Latham & Co. the individual is not notable but it is possible that the private bank is however the sources are poor and carry only trivial information with no depth of coverage which if unimproved therefore fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)