Deletion of Scott D. White (computer scientist)

Comment: Fails , , and . Wikipedia is not Monster.com
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:VAIN)

Comment: The massive conflict of interest means this biography needs to be restarted from scratch by a 3rd party because it reads like Wikipedia:Vanity in its current state. Lack of 3rd party |reliable sources apart from a listing of his research papers mean it's also hard to |verify his notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Prod tags can be removed by the author; you didn't err in doing so.  I just mentioned it in the nomination for deletion to be thorough.  However, I'm not sure that a person who is all-but-dissertated and isn't a primary co-author on a few academic papers is |notable enough to warrant an encyclopedic entry.  This is not to disparage your son or his works, but WP has standards about what constitutes a notable person and I don't think his works satisfy those conditions yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)