Deletion of List of UK railfan jargon (3rd nomination)

Comment: Nomination based on a misinterpretation of .  Yes, slang does belong on Wikipedia, as long as it is sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: the article is generally properly |sourced. It is not trivia. The article has been kept twice before at AfD and has been improved since then. The nominating editor's bias is shown by the use of |schoolyard taunts and |personal attacks the he feels are necessary when stating his case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CIVIL||WP:NPA)

Comment: the terms listed are also used in the rail industry and not just by railfans.  Every entry in the list has at least one footnote pointing to a |reliable source and terms are now vetted for accuracy and verifiability before they are included in this list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)