Deletion of 2010 Hebei tractor rampage

Comment: Fails , and is a product of journalism-like sensationalism. Wikipedia is |not a newspaper. The deaths of seventeen people is quite run-of-the-mill. I suppose Mr Cullen has not opened a newspaper on any given day. Regardless, number of deaths has nothing to do with whether an event is notable. It must have a  historical impact, and it must have  in  sources long after it has passed. This event does not have these things. A brief spike in interest at the time of the event does not make notability. It most have lasting encyclopaedic significance, and this does not. It is sensational tabloid tripe. Crime is rarely notable. Delete this article. Likewise, the Glasgow article should've been deleted, but people don't care about Wikipedia policies and guidelines these days. That's , pure and simple, and it will be deleted in future. This article must go now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:DIVERSE||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Having been asked to take a look at Chinese sources for the article I'd say that sufficient significant coverage in reliable sources does exist to establish notability (see https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%85%83%E6%B0%8F%E5%8E%BF%E9%93%B2%E8%BD%A6%E5%86%B2%E6%92%9E%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%E5%85%83%E6%B0%8F%E5%8E%BF%E9%93%B2%E8%BD%A6%E5%86%B2%E6%92%9E%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6&newwindow=1&start=20 this search). The event is unusual because of the tractor, the number of people killed and (from a  perspective) the fact that things like this are extremely rare occurences in China, never mind that they are actually reported by state controlled media. There is a secondary |alternative to deletion beyond keep, which is a merge with School attacks in China (2010–12
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB||WP:ATD)