Deletion of Marc Straus (2nd nomination)

Comment: The standard for the GNG isn't “received significant awards or honors” and “made a widely recognized contribution that is part of an enduring historical record in a specific field.” The subject just needs to receive "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There are more than enough references in the article that meet this criteria (e.g. https://books.google.com/books?id=sl0amQiCtmwC&q=marc+j.+straus+was+a+clinical+investigator+at+boston+university&pg=PA52#v=snippet&q=marc%20j.%20straus%20was%20a%20clinical%20investigator%20at%20boston%20university&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=Y0ABzs0Yl5oC&q=marc+straus+boston&pg=PA420#v=snippet&q=marc%20straus%20boston&f=false https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1915&dat=19800715&id=pzAiAAAAIBAJ&pg=2539,2696809&hl=en https://science.sciencemag.org/content/212/4501/1367 and the offline sources such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Straus#cite_ref-29 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Straus#cite_ref-32). In addition, I believe the subject meets  since he meets the criterion of "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources" as a widely cited author of academic papers (see https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&q=%22marc+straus%22&btnG=&oq=%22mar Google Scholar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)