Deletion of Wonky Donkey

Comment: Either the book or Smith (but probably not both) merits an article; Smith meets : both have received quite a bit of press coverage in Australia and New Zealand: 5 refs on article plushttp://www.scene.co.nz/wonky-donkey-authors-next-book-takes-flight/302889a1.pagehttp://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown-lakes/336406/smiths-wonky-donkey-glastonburyhttp://www.borderchronicle.com.au/story/2528255/primary-kids-loved-the-wonky-donkey/. And it did receive a NZ children's book award.http://booksellers.co.nz/awards/new-zealand-post-childrens-book-awards/2010-Awards Could consider moving to Smith. It might be by a paid editor, but it's hardly an advert
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Non notable book by non notable author(s) (no Wikipedia pages). Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Come on! How can a book with a title like this be considered for deletion?{{=)}} Seriously though, this book definitely meets  being the winner of a New Zealand book award(I have included the relevent award page in article), the subject of numerous press articles (thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: There are a lot of people wanting to keep this article but apart from 'I like it' nobody is citing notability criteria or even suggesting that any awards themselves are particularly notable per Wikipedia. Still fails  and the authors (if there was an article about them which there isn't) fail  - a 'bit' of press coverage doen't cut it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:CREATIVE)