Deletion of El Goonish Shive (2nd nomination)

Comment: The non-existant google news hits don't matter according to .  There seem to be enough reliable sources to prove notability to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)

Comment: I will admit that this comic produces zero Google News hits...but then again neither does Megatokyo or Garfield (comic strip) for that matter.  And  does state that Google hits can not be used as exclusive reasoning to prove or disprove noteability.  However a rather quick google search for " "El Goonish Shive" -wikipedia -egscomics.com " yeilded over 10k hits, some of which lend toward noteability. For example: http://collegejolt.com/?p=12083 a review of EGS on College Jolt , http://www.amazon.com/Read-Owl-Will-Goonish-Shive/dp/1932775102/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1273487029&sr=1-1 Amazon's listing of EGS volume 1 , http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ElGoonishShive A tvtropes review of EGS , http://www.sequentialtart.com/reports.php?ID=5184&issue=2007-04-01 The Sequential tart review mentioned below , http://www.fanfiction.net/comic/El_Goonish_Shive/ I shudder to think of it, but a fanfic page about EGS , http://elgoonishshive.wikia.com/wiki/Shiveapedia shiveapedia, an EGS Wiki , http://www.masterzdm.com/enter/webcomicbookclub/full.php?cid=76 The link cited at the start of this AfD , and http://www.tangents.us/2010/03/29/el-goonish-shive-7/ a tangents review of EGS.  This was all accomplished in a matter of 10 minutes worth of looking and 30 minutes worth of wikityping, while I do admit that not all of these articles meet the requirements of "reliable, independent sources" I feel that these do show a pattern of influence that is "notability." (One last thing I want to add, I may be scarred forever after finding the rule 34 EGS page that I didn't link here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)

Comment: I have added the |AfD header to Characters of El Goonish Shive. If there is a |consensus to delete the main article then I'd find it unlikely that there would be one to keep the |spin out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:SS)

Comment: fails Wikipedia:Notability, poorly sourced, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. And per Guest9999's examples, clear consensus over many years of deletion discussions that these webcomics have not somehow auto-magically   any kind of notability from this little-known publisher
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Being on Keenspot does not meet specific notability guidelines for web comics, and regardless, the lack of reliable sources runs afoul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)