Deletion of Ukanian

Comment: We ''may'' be able to meet  here. I've found some sources, but these '''''do not support''''' the picture painted by the above IPs/users. For example, the essay "Multi-Culturalism and Northern Ireland: Making Differences Fruitful" by Edna Longley, in ''Multi-culturalism: The View from the Two Irelands'' (Edna Longley, Declan Kiberd, {{ISBN|1859183115}}), contains specifically mentions "Ukanian" and says "Ukania" is "Tom Nairn's derisive term for the United Kingdom". Checking Google Scholar... there ''are'' sources there. I'm not sure if they can pass , but I think there's something here. Could someone else assist
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NEO)

Comment: I understand that you may have heard the word or used it before. I think this is entirely possible. The problem with that is the article violates two of the most important criteria for inclusion, |Verifiability and |No Original Research. If you can provide attestation evidence of the word in such a way that it satisfies the |neologism guideline, then I'm sure we'll all reconsider our delete !votes. Until that time, this article should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NEO)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICT)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a dictionary or guide to slang, and no evidence is provided that this #Articles on neologisms|neologism is in general use, or any use - see #Reliable sources for neologisms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NAD||WP:NEO||WP:NEO)