Deletion of Wayne Shaw (footballer)

Comment: While the name of the league he played in is National League (division), don't be confused into thinking it's the top tier of English football. In fact, it's the fifth tier, so  isn't satisfied
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: although he fails FOOTY, he easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: passes . And BLP1E looks like BL'''PIE''', hehe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: fails , , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: classic case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: While he may fail , he seems to have enough coverage to pass GNG, such as http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/fa-league-cups/sutton-arsenal-wayne-shaw-pie-bet-goalkeeper-gambling-the-sun-fa-a7590781.html and http://www.espnfc.com/blog/the-toe-poke/65/post/3065259/sutton-goalkeeper-wayne-shaw-enjoys-fa-cup-match-with-a-drink-and-a-pie
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Whether or not he's played professionally, two of the citations look independent and are specifically about him (and yes, I did notice that one of them was from the ''Daily Mail'', recently agreed to be non-
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: while article does fail  I also belive that it passes  because of the large amount of media coverage the subject gained.  doesn't apply either as people were talking about this footballer well before February 20, see http://www.espnfc.com/blog/the-toe-poke/65/post/3052268/arsenal-could-face-the-biggest-keeper-in-britain-against-sutton here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Fails  and . Also per oneevent, which isn't even that significant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: as a clear-cut case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: borderline , however, I think there is enough coverage before the pie-eating incident to take outside of that.  The whole reason the betting incident took place was that he was a notably large goalkeeper.  That is covered in the article here http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/15098437.Meet_Wayne_Shaw__Sutton_United_s_Roly_Poly_Goalie/ and here http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/why-sutton-uniteds-roly-poly-goalie-wayne-shaw-is-not-your-stereotypical-goalkeeper-a3471551.html - both predate the match in question.  Think of it this way -  bets would not be offered on a non-notable person.  Even if you don't agree, he would have to be at least quasi-notable for best to be offered.  Otherwise, no one would bet because they would have literally no idea who the bet is talking about.  The betting scandal from the pie eating incident put him over the top.  It's  and not  (or maybe even WP:BLP1.5E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP2E)

Comment: per . Fails  and unlikely to satisfy it in future. Incident can be mentioned in articles on Sutton, this season's FA Cup, football betting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: The subject wouldn't satisfy the overly inclusive . There is minimal coverage before this event, which makes this a . The reason we require multiple sources is so that we can have an NPOV article and the  exists so that a biography doesn't give undue weight to certain events. The event itself is not really notable enough to have a separate article. Why should we then have a BLP? The article as it stands is essentially a  which I am not comfortable having on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:PSEUDO)

Comment: for a National League footballer, he has significant coverage. And the pie eating incident is also generating him significant coverage, and so he just about passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)