Deletion of Rebecca Black

Comment: per  and . The song may be notable, but there's no reason to believe the singer will be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: She is a charting artist, and as much as I cannot stand her song, it has reached the Billboard Hot 100, so is thus notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: A bona-fide pop star per ; she should be treated the same as any other independent musician who makes the charts in four different countries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: It seems to me that she is definitely notable at present, if the buzz dies down and she doesn't do anything else notable then perhaps it would be common sense to support deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Smells like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The article meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The song has charted in the UK http://www.theofficialcharts.com/singles-chart/, which means she passes . Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: prefer '''Merge'''. Technically she passes , so she's entitled to have an article. But I don't think it's really necessary when most of it duplicates the information in Friday (Rebecca Black song). I would say either merge this article into the one on the song, or (my preference) merge the article on the song into this one. We don't need two articles on essentially the same subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: I agree with postdlf.  is incompatible with  and, relevant to what postdlf was saying,  should overtly prohibit its application to any of the professions on , such as s or s ( would seem to be the exception
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NTEMP||WP:BIO||WP:ARTIST||WP:COMPOSER||WP:CRIMINAL)

Comment: I don't see the point in nominating an article about a singer for deletion immediately after she reaches the Billboard Hot 100 for the first time. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/us-rebeccablack-idUSTRE72O5H220110325 Having a single on a national music chart is supposed to establish a performer as notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: she has a currently charting single with a new single to be released next; passes . EnDaLeCoMpLeX (Special:Contributions/EnDaLeCoMpLeX|contributions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: sorry, but there isn't a shadow of a doubt on notability.  doesn't apply when said person is http://www.nme.com/news/various-artists/55718 working on a new single and album
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: As much as I don't agree with it,  says that charting even a single song on any national chart is sufficient to establish notability.  As such, the only justification for deleting would be Tarc's IAR, but IAR doesn't apply when there's a solid consensus in favor of something (as there appears to be here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)