Deletion of Myles Cochrane

Comment: Though this is not a voting procedure we would like our votes to be counted in reference to the guidelines on notability mentioned. This guy has a significant body of journalistic work on notable people. This guy won a national academic award. Please see Criteria 2 on : Myles won a national award. Please see  Creative Professionals (Criteria 4):The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. His journalistic work on http://www.kslg.com/myles is vast, monumental, and significant- which means it fits category "a."  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/137.150.100.22|137.150.100.22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I heard about this debate on Myles show last night. I've read the this entire page and it looks like people have found some striking evidence that Myles should have a wikipage because of  Criteria 2 and  Criteria 4a. Secondary sources can be linked to primary sources for cross-referencing, and the interviews he does are great!  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/137.150.35.220|137.150.35.220
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: If the article's creator is in fact Myles Cochrane, I would advise him to read . If he is in fact not Myles Cochrane, may I extract and quote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: local DJ, not notable per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There should be a strong presumption against |autobiographies. If someone is notable, an independent person will eventually start an article. In addition, the article creator is misreading the notability guidelines. He claims that there is a significant collective body of work that he has created. First, I don't think the significant has been established. Second, the article creator neglects the remainder of that criterion, that the work "has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." There isn't a book, feature film, or set of independent periodical articles discussing Cochrane's interviews. That's not severable; it can't simply be ignored. I don't think the academia is the proper notability test. Although the subject is a student, his supposed notability doesn't seem to come from teaching/research. But again, he's reading out of existence important parts of the tests. It's not enough to win a national award. It has to be a "highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." The level of prestige hasn't been estalished. The organization (let alone the particular award) don't even appear to have its own wikipedia article. And even though the award is given to student broadcasters, I don't think it should fall under the academic test anyway. After all, an award given for the sports exploits of student-athlete would lead to the athlete being judge under the academic standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO)