Deletion of British-India Holocaust

Comment: Let see , clearly fails ; relies on a single source hence, fails ; title itself is blatantly . gcount for "British-India Holocaust" gives only 7 links(1 to this AFD; 1to this article:Late Victorian Holocaust also under AFDWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Late Victorian Holocaust; rest are videos
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: This article's title is not compatible with . The contents are also non-neutrally written. Apart from the references, which might be added to a different article covering this period of Indian history, there's nothing encyclopaedic that can really be rescued from this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: inherent violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per everyone else. Violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I believe the article should be deleted for several reasons.  Firstly, 'British-India Holocaust' is a neologism that breaks .  One could argue that the sources used by the article mean that 'British-India Holocaust' isn't a neologism.  They do look reliable, but the fact that one source that was listed has been shown to not exist, does make me cast doubt over the rest of the sources listed.  Unfortunately, the user who added the sources has not added enough information for me to check the sources, and thus I feel this article does not yet meet , and as a result does not also meet, imo, .  If someone could verify the rest of the sources listed, that would be excellent.  Another reason why I believe this article should not exist is the fact that there is already an article covering the Great Famine of 1876–78, and duplicates of the same subject should not be allowed.  I believe the Great Famine of 1876–78 article should be kept at the expense of the British-India Holocaust article, because the Great Famine of 1876–78 one is much more balanced.  If the sources used in the B-I article can be verified, I will consider advocating a merge between the B-I and the Great Famine of 1876–78 article.  Until that happens, I believe '''Delete''' is the appropriate action to be taken against the B-I article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:N)