Deletion of Matt Cooke (cyclist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: It is true that Cooke does not satisfy the additional criteria of , so he has to be judged through . Although he has just retired, I think he has gotten enough coverage, especially in the cycling press, to just pass notability criteria: http://www.denverpost.com/cycling/ci_23914108/boulder-cyclist-matt-cooke-still-cooks-after-loss, http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/matt-cooke-takes-hard-road-to-kom-jersey-at-usa-pro-challenge, http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/cooke-faces-challenging-off-season, http://www.bicycling.com/video/matt-cooke-how-it-feels-be-kom, http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/11/news/cooke-one-of-many-facing-unknown-future-after-exergy-team-folds_266569, http://velonews.competitor.com/2014/08/news/candelario-day-louder-cooke-retiring-domestic-peloton_342999, http://crankpunk.com/2014/11/10/matt-cooke-interview-you-would-never-know-their-names-if-they-had-never-taken-drugs/, http://www.dailypeloton.com/displayarticle.asp?pk=19571, http://cyclingillustrated.com/team-jamis-hagens-berman-adds-matt-cooke/, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCYC||WP:GNG)