Deletion of Scott Doe (3rd nomination)

Comment: because this person passes the , a fact that rather seriously undermines all these people who're saying that he isn't notable.  See my remark at the earlier DRV, where I cited significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Scott Doe has made his debut for Dagenahm & Redbridge in League Two, against Crewe Alexandra, passing 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Meets regular notability requirements.  would be nice, but its not required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: as I already stated,  alone (which is a guideline itself) is not enough to establish notability for simple athletes, especially minor league footballers. In cases like these,  must be ''also'' met. Also, please note that news coverage (which may be pretty extensive on football in Europe, even in minor leagues) does not automatically give notability to a subject. I am however also supportive of freezing this AfD until August 8, so that we can realize if the subject can actually meet  for that date and, in that case, I would be happy to change my !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: I'd find it hard to justify the retention of Scott Dee, non-professional league, fails  no notability to speak off
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: yes he fails , but he also quite clearly passes the parent guideline of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG)

Comment: many of the references are trivial and the subject fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Fails  and all coverage I can find is either trivial or local
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Easily passes  as he has had significant coverage by reliable sources.  While this person might not pass 's "Additional criteria" of WP:ATHLETE, the heading of "Additional criteria" states: "Should a person fail to meet these additional criteria, '''they may still be notable''' under Wikipedia:Notability." (Boldface not mine but is in original  text.)  I'm still waiting for the former teacher Barack Obama AfD with the stipulation "Fails WP:TEACHER."  It's going to happen.  You know it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Primarily because this guy is plays in the 6th level of English football and although there are multiple sources provided they are of a trivial routine nature and mentions provide nothing indepth to show notability,  outlines that ''"routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for a topic to have its own standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)