Deletion of Lisa Donovan

Comment: Being the primary subject of ''New York Times'' and ''Der Spiegel'' articles http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/29/arts/television/29wall.html?pagewanted=print http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/tech/0,1518,437481,00.html alone easily satisfy .  The nom has given no credible reason (actually no reason at all) as to why they think this person doesn't pass .  Interestingly, she got on MadTV ''after'' the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LisaNova|first AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: There are a few references, and the NYT one does satisfy . A single ref may be considered trivial, but three of the other refs are debatable (zap2it, movieweb, and adweek
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)