Deletion of Alex Alfieri

Comment: Fails . As a |BLP the criterion is more stringent than just two reliable sources out of only three. If we are going to accept "machine translations" with no human oversight or as mentioned above that, ''"no human editor has confirmed the accuracy of the translation"'', so we are taking a machines proverbial word of notability, then maybe most of us can just retire and let the machines handle it all. I agree that something deemed notable in one country may not be seen as notable in another as the standards vary. There are of course "world notable subjects" but also "country notable" subjects. Any rationale short of that means we can just stop dancing around and merge all languages into a one world encyclopedia with a drop-down box for the different translations. We are digressing down to two reliable independent sources when three has been an acceptable community standard that shows clear notability. I also agree though, that some human intervention might sway things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BLP)

Comment: Passes . He's the author of 59 peer reviewed journal articles in my university database and his position as Chief of Neurosurgery at a major Swiss research hospital would seem to meet criterias #5 as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)