Deletion of Responsibility assumption (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nomination makes a |vague wave to .  That's about "''Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the opinions of experts).''"  That's not what we have here as the page has been incrementally developed over 18 years by over 100 editors and so is more of a mish-mash, as discussed above,  with no particular person being responsible.  Some actual editing by a single person seems needed to make the text more coherent with a tighter scope and flow.  Uncle G seems to have a clear vision and so should be given the opportunity to follow up.  Our policy in such cases is , "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE||WP:NOTESSAY||WP:ATD)

Comment: per . The topic may be notable, but the current article is a poorly written mess tagged with OR for years. It has no footnotes. No prejduce for this being recreated, which will be much easier once the volunteer who want to do so is not burdened having to read or rewrte this mess
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per Uncle G the article may be kept with a reduced version as a majority of it seems undoubtedly  without secondary references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)