Deletion of Prahlad Basu

Comment: despite the significant cleanup required for this article. I found a source for his being a distinguished professor, previously included in the article but tagged as needing a citation. This gives him a pass of #C5. His work within the Indian government may also be significant enough for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: That one source for the article looks to be a primary source, a conference paper written by him (including, presumably, the bio). Given his age, it seems likely he's retired, but at this moment anyway he's nowhere to be found on the school's website. #C5 furthermore requires the distinguished position be at a "major institution of higher education and research". Does Fore School of Management qualify? Possibly? The bigger problem that changed this from just a "Comment" to Weak Delete is that we have here a BLP that does not include even one single solitary reliable source that wasn't written by him, so far as I can see, and thus nothing to base an article on. So my delete !vote should be viewed as without prejudice to recreation if such reliable independent sources turn up. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: This doesn't satisfy GNG and I believe doesn't satisfy #C5. My first issue with C5 is {{tq|Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level}}. I see absolutely no evidence that the subject is tenured or that the subject even taught at the institution for an extended amount of time. The website has absolutely no mentions and neither do any other sources. Looking at the subjects teaching positions, I see that he has held quite a few visiting profs/non-tenured positions in other institutes as well. The second issue is that I wonder if the school itself is a major institution. From what I have seen, it doesn't seem like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)