Deletion of Games Research Inc

Comment: per comments above, and per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: to Diplomacy (game) as ATD. According to the latest https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Request_for_Comment_on_the_Subject-specific_notability_guidelines_(SNG) RfC, at , the applicable guideline is CORP for determining whether references meet the criteria for establishing notability. It is a stricter guideline that vanilla GNG. Cunard above links to reference and says they meet GNG. This isn't the appropriate guideline. Looking through the lens of NCORP, the references fail the criteria. There are three references marked as "Significant". The first from the New York Times is *entirely* based on an interview with the president of Games Research and information provided by the company. There is no "Independent Content" and fails . I believe http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,875449,00.html this links to the second reference based on the extract shown by Cunard above. It contains no in-depth information on the company and also appears to be entirely based on information and quotations provided by the president of the company as part of a promotion of their "newest" game "What's That on My Head?". This fails  and . The third reference suffers from the same problems, it is entirely based on an interview with the president of the company and information provided by the company. Fails . I am unable to locate *any* references which meet the criteria, this topic fails NCORP
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)