Deletion of St. Luke Lutheran Church

Comment: I appreciate your comment and it has been most informative. What's in  appears more to be about things or stories that absolutely no reliable source (or potentially none at all) exist. I can't agree that would hold true for a place, which is obvious that someone could visit it an find that it currently exists (and that would be inheritly a reliable source). That is covered in the central discussion: '''wrong forum''' &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:HARMLESS)

Comment: See  and . Also a proposal is not a guideline, and individual churches are not settlements. Do  you you have a current guideline about the notability of churches to link to that shows this "changed...view on the guideline"? I've written dozens of articles on small towns and would argue that every one is notable, but as stated above, individual churches are rarely notable unless they are historic, such as West Union Baptist Church or Salem First United Methodist Church. Note that each of these is the "first" or "oldest" in some area. On the other  hand, their current congregational activities alone would not make them notable if they, say moved to a brand  new building
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:HARMLESS||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: per . Most individual local churches are non-notable. The church has apparently been mentioned on occasion in independent reliable sources but does not appear to have received significant coverage from them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)