Deletion of Roy Stuart (photographer)

Comment: Y'all have missed the full article review of "Roy Stuart III" at http://www.salon.com/2001/05/03/stuart_3/, I've also found indications although not definitive that volumes 1 and 3 received reviews in Playboy.  (As in, Amazon quotes those reviews.)  Putting aside the plausible but unproven references at Playboy, the Salon reference and the other links provided reach 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He has an entry in the curatorial reference work http://books.google.com/books?id=XQJKAQAAIAAJ Dictionary of erotic artists, multiple articles in french magazines, etc. Even setting aside any popular press considerations,  notability has been directly met with a {{tq|collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book.}} The Taschen books are not self-publishing and were put together by an editor for Taschen. His body of work was the subject of a retrospective book more than four times, even if you discount every other mention anywhere else. He meets the basic demands of creative professional notability (which is not the same as general fame
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)