Deletion of Aravind L Iyer

Comment: Just counting the papers on which he is first author, I see in Google scholar 345, 285, 282, 237, 221, 220, etc cites. The citations for his other papers are even more stellar. Our article on him is not good, but he clearly passes #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: To add to Eppstein's devastating comment. Top GS cites for "L Aravind" are 7054, 1019, 860, 612..., h index around 80 to give wide pass of rof#C1. Even in a highly cited  field this is colossal. Nominator should read efore before making further AfD nominations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:B)

Comment: subject to confirmation by someone with access to a better citation metric.  Based on a Google Scholar search http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22aravind%2C+l%22+-author%3Aaravind&btnG=Search&as_sdt=20000000001&as_ylo=&as_vis=0, Iyer appears to pass Criterion 1 of , making him notable.  (See Note 1 of .)  Iyer being the editor and an article author of the ''Wiley Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics'' would also seem to lend weight to the notability argument.  The fact that the article is currently a stub, and could be expanded to explain the man's impact, is not sufficient grounds for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)