Deletion of List of notable supporters of PETA

Comment: Unencyclopedic list with little objective criteria. What makes each supporter "notable" enough to be on the list? "Supporter" is also not defined. This gives rise to serious |POV issues and may constitute original research in some respects. Most importantly, I fail to see how this list is any more encyclopedic than List of celebrities with links to the Conservative Party of Canada (and three other Canadian political parties) (see the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrities with links to the Conservative Party of Canada|AfD Discussion here), or the equivalant American lists, List of celebrities with links to the U.S. Democratic Party and List of celebrities with links to the U.S. Republican Party (see the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrities with links to the U.S. Democratic Party|AfD for those here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: As per Agent 86's comments. Articles on Wikipedia get contested for notability everyday. Having an article in Wikipedia is ''not'' "proof" of notability. If it were, contesting notability in fD wouldn't be possible and every |vanity page out there would be validly notable, just because it's here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:VAIN)