Deletion of LongArm

Comment: Consists entirely of |original research based on youtube videos. Are there more of these? They should have been nominated in a single AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as character appeared on a memorable television show and as a http://www.finalfrontiertoys.com/VintageToys/Other/COPS_Long_Arm_C-9+.jpg toy.  As nominator suggests and in keeping with , , and
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it.  The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  |Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.  Note, am now copying this to several AFD, which are the same, nominated by the same person, with the same invalid argument about mindlessly following the guidelines passed by deletionists campers as an excuse to get rid of things they personally don't like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)