Deletion of Scott Mitchell (businessman)

Comment: Further Research: Easily meets  as he was profiled/interviewed frequently as shown in his CampaignStreet interview, his SpotLight on DMConfidential interview, and his Wall Street Interview. We also must take into account  as there seems to be some biased here against certain businesses and sertain CEO's. Subject of multiple non-trivial published works just do a Google for his name. This whole debate is a perfect example of Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias|systemic bias in my opinion. AFD is not a means to solicit for sources. That is what the {sources} tag is for. However, I see plenty of sources. Also we now know for sure that he is mentioned in several Who's Who books. Searches for his own books on internet development and marketing on http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/002-9952696-4900818?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=%22scott+mitchell%22&Go.x=10&Go.y=6 Amazon.com and http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/results.asp?ATH=Scott+Mitchell&z=y BarnesAndNoble.com returned his books in stock that are regularly sold by these major book retailers.  His first business (Tunes.com) was sold for $180 million and owned RollingStone Magazine which is notable to the music industry.  His second company is HSN.com and is a $500 million ecommerce site notable to television retailing and ecommerce and his third business is one of the 5 largest online advertising agencies and is publicly traded on the AMEX. Sorry for the brain dump here. Just confused as to why we are debating this in the first place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIAS)