Deletion of McFarland & Company

Comment: Just because an organization says that it is a leading publisher doesn't mean that it ''is'' a leading publisher.  says "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Where is that significant coverage? The company's website is not "significant coverage," or otherwise coretheapple.com could proclaim me as "the world's greatest living Wikipedian" and up goes the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: based on the three current sources (not including the company website, which doesn't count towards ): the UNC ref (which is, frankly, fawning), the ''Mountain Times'' (press releases) and the ''Seattle Times'' article, the only RS in the lot.  requires more than one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:VRS)

Comment: This page was nominated as a result of dministrator's noticeboard/Incidents#Bookspam, which was semi-unrelated to this page itself. Whether this is a POINTy nomination or not remains to be seen
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)