Deletion of ISO 13407

Comment: The article currently lacks any acceptable sources. Are there any that can be shown to meet the 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22ISO+13407%22&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws 2,390 gScholar hits which stopped the article's deletion via |PROD cannot be ignored. It seems as though the standard has received "significant coverage" as required by the |GNG. Not quoted by Ron Ritzman (neutral nominator) was this pro-deletion argument: "It is also worth noting that ISO 13407 was replaced last year by ISO 9241, further undermining its notability." However, |notability is not temporary (and I can only assume this is why the nominator left it out). Furthermore, the IP nominator adds "a review of of its current content" to the list of reasons for deletion. Article issues outside of those listed at #REASON| "should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD||WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP||WP:DEL)

Comment: I didn't ignore  when I nominated it, I just worded the nomination poorly. ISO standards start with a presumption of notability based just on the organisation's charter.  And for that reason they get coverage in multiple places if you define "significant" in terms of numbers of hits without regard to what those multiple hits actually say about the standard. I've been part of groups that have worked on standards in the past, and from that experience I'd suggest that a hypothetical otability (standards) interpret "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to be worthy of notice" to mean that the standard had an impact beyond its mere publication.  I took a look at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.101.6086&rep=rep1&type=pdf and found it hard to come up with anything impactful about ISO 13407.  Here are some statements from that paper that suggest ISO 13407's notable contributions to making software usable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:N)