Deletion of Wee Shu Min elitism controversy (2nd nomination)

Comment: to Wee Siew Kim: Definitely an indication of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: In my opinion,  doesn't really apply here. This is an event which was notable and is often cited as an example of elitism. I can find secondary references in academic sources https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00131911.2011.598916, https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789814663380_0068,https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5250/resilience.1.2.003?seq=1,https://www.jstor.org/stable/20445123?seq=1, https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/case-studies/20170505_deliberative_democracy_in_singapore.pdf, https://books.google.com/books?id=4dE0AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA301. There are also news articles such as https://www.reuters.com/article/us-singapore-inequality-idUSSIN11192420061219, https://zeenews.india.com/exclusive/singapores-growing-rift-between-haves-and-have-nots-_1582.html, https://www.asiaone.com/digital/why-netizens-are-fuming-over-rgs-spokesman-comments-ordinary-singaporean. If I am correct, the article was originally linked from Gifted Education Programme (Singapore) (in a criticism section), but seems like someone has removed the entire section. I understand the BLP implications and I wouldn't mind if the article is renamed to something like "2006 Singapore elitism controversy". However, I don't think the article should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)