Deletion of Rene Reinmann

Comment: There are enough reliable sources on this person to show that he passes  and anything negative appears to be well sourced to satisfy any BLP concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: but with strict adherence to . The attention given to him in media "probably" makes him notable. However, I just removed the section with all the offenses he's been convicted of. It's overkill, superfluous, and I think it violates BLP policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: As pointed out above, the person involved is thoroughly covered in Estonian news media, and the offences listed are matched to , some even with online copies of court rulings.  (Unfortunately, earlier Estonian court rulings are not online, and a few years ago, the Ministry of Justice migrated to a new infosystem that does not support linking to court rulings
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: first off, speedy keep is inappropriate when editors have argued to delete, as above, especially when the reasons presented are as well-considered as WebHamster's. Second, editors seem to be forgetting that media references do not equate to notability. Pedantically quoting from the policy: ''Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry.'' Thus, while he may have been the object of some press attention, I fail to see what, exactly, is notable here per . Frankly, shrilly asserting speedy keep and hiding behind  instead of instancing something that asserts notability is a poor argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)