Deletion of Ty Fox

Comment: He may not pass PORNBIO, but he meets GNG for the coverage of his firing and for the material in the "Out at Work" book about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).  In addition to the WaPo article and the citation to the book which appear in the article currently,  research would have turned up at least these other reliable sources: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1996/07/24/coachs-firing-planned/cf916be4-1210-4f8a-b9b9-1b6b5f504aec/?utm_term=.a92c51da35ab COACH'S FIRING PLANNED (Washington Post), https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/news/article/13012707/the-fruits-of-his-labors The Fruits of His Labors (Washington City Paper), and https://www.jstor.org/stable/488678 Beyond Gay: "Deviant" Sex and the Politics of the ENDA Workplace (article in the scholarly journal ''Social Text'').I think the Post and City Paper about the outing and the two scholarly refs about ENDA are enough for our notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There is no proper indication of notability outside of the controversy, failing . The one bluelinked production company in his filmography lists no films there, and there are no articles about any of the films in his filmography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)