Deletion of George Bingham Arbuthnot

Comment: Fails  and also fails  (neither of the two sources is independent).    A #Biographies puts it, "Any person that that is only mentioned in genealogical records or family histories, or is traceable only through primary documents, is probably not notable". Apart from its failure to meet the guidelines, I can find no other grounds to keep this article; it is barely long enough to count as stub-class, it has no independent references, and there is not even the smallest clue to suggest the man did anything notable. He appears to have been an simply an obscure functionary in the British Raj, whose biography has been created and maintained by two editors (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Kittybrewster&namespace= http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=62.101.207.27) who are fixated on Arbuthnots
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:MILITARY)

Comment: fails . No evidence his military service was notable in any way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)