Deletion of PBS logos

Comment: Cunard's sources demonstrate that this subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The "fancruft" nomination and subsequent arguments for deletion based upon this notion are not guideline-based, (Wikipedia:Fancruft is an essay), and the topic meets , although perhaps on a weaker level. Concerns about original research can be addressed by |copy editing the article, rather than deleting it in entirety
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: per everyone above -  isn't a valid reason for deletion, Might I suggest people stop renominating this - it's staying so give up, Anyway keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: An AfD proposal based on bare assertion of "cruft", in the face of extensive sourcing and repeated discussions, is basically equivalent to . {{U|Viriditas}}, who sadly seems no longer to be active on Wikipedia, made a clear case for this subject's notability at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS idents (3rd nomination) (see also {{U|Black Falcon}}'s comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS idents (2nd nomination)), and I have not seen anything in subsequent discussions that changes that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)