Deletion of Bertrand (film)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can actually do better than this. There is one good source in the article, but making a film notable just because it exists requires more than just one source — and as I don't have any viable access to databases of Australian media coverage from the 1960s, I cannot speak to whether any other coverage exists to salvage it with. But we don't keep inadequately sourced articles about films that haven't been properly shown to clear  just because we ''assume'' that better notability-building sources ''might'' exist — we keep such articles only if better notability-building sources are ''shown'' to exist. So if somebody with better access than I've got to Australian newspaper archives can find sufficient sourcing, that would change things — but until that happens, one source isn't enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Two independent reliable sources with significant coverage is the  standard, and with the new citation posted above it is now met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)