Deletion of The formation of Malaysia

Comment: along the lines of . Sure, an article on this topic could probably be written, but at the moment readers are far better served by being directed to the main history page, which unlike this page wasn't made as some poorly written attempt based on interpretations of primary sources to push a fringe POV. Focusing on a merge is pointless, as most of the page was copy pasted from other areas anyway, and most of the sources are as noted primary ones that have been interpreted to fit a viewpoint. There are few editors in this area, and they shouldn't be forced to 'clean up' something that has to be rewritten from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:dynamite)

Comment: The current title for the topic seems more natural and sensible than the rival ones such as 20-point agreement, which is a poor title contrary to .  The topic is notable as there are entire books written with this or similar titles — ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=padAAAAAIAAJ The Formation of Malaysia''; ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iUVDAQAAIAAJ Australia and the formation of Malaysia''; ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4YluAAAAMAAJ Ghazali Shafie's Memoir on the Formation of Malaysia''; ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZDAzHQAACAAJ The Formation of Malaysia and Secession of Singapore: 1963-1965''.  If the topic is disputed then that's a matter of ordinary editing and dispute resolution. If there's a problem with a particular editor then that is best dealt with elsewhere
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:PRECISION)