Deletion of Ideolexico

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Don't get distracted by translation.  "Ideolexico" is a  in any language.  English "idiolect" is Spanish "idiolecto".  Furthermore, the meaning of "ideo-" is quite different from "idio-".  It looks like a mistranslation in the parallel texts from "ideolexico" to "idiolect" when "ideolexicon" may have been a better neologism in English.  I don't think his article "Ideolexico" has any relationship to the "Idiolect" article.  I would tend towards deletion strictly on the neologism/original research aspect but will withhold opinion in case of factual error in what I am saying
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: It seems clear that "ideolexico" is a |non-notable neologism, apparently one man's coinage in Spanish: ''ideoléxico is a recent and it is part of the Political Semantic Fields Theory. It is used to indicate the semantic construction and the ideological enhancement of a word as the tensions of social power take place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)