Deletion of List of fictional schools (3rd nomination)

Comment: WP:NOTUSEFUL  etc. Has the topic being discussed as a group in reliable sources? It sure has: https://globalnews.ca/news/3643027/tv-movie-schools/ Global TV, ''https://www.bustle.com/articles/130784-14-fictional-schools-from-books-ranked Bustle'', ''https://www.vulture.com/article/best-fictional-tv-schools.html Vulture'', ''https://www.theguardian.com/childrens-books-site/2011/nov/01/discussion-favourite-fictional-school The Guardian'', https://books.google.com/books?id=TsdRAQAAIAAJ Manchester University Press, ''https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540253.2010.549113 Journal of Gender and Education
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: Per . There appears to be a not insignificant amount of fictional schools that have Wikipedia articles, making this list merited as long as it consists only of fully sourced entries/bluelinks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: The nomination's rationales are ludicrous. Not a search engine? So we should delete all lists, categories, navigational templates and the search function? That's nonsense. The key point is whether the list is notable per  and this one clearly passes. As we're apparently not a search engine, I won't list any sources yet; that's an exercise for the reader. This includes the nominator as they don't seem to have studied the topic in any detail, as required by . If they had done, they would have noticed that the famous Hogwarts isn't in the list because there's a separate one for List of fictional magic schools|magic schools. 5 points from Slytherin
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:BEFORE)