Deletion of Mark J. Dworkin

Comment: Testimonials and passing mentions aren't enough for  or any other kind of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to ''American Mythmaker'' as suggested above and edit. The reviews satisfy  #1. See, e.g. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/615291, http://www.denverpost.com/2015/06/18/books-regional-non-fiction-works-reviewed-by-sandra-dallas-highlight-western-history/ and http://reviews.libraryjournal.com/2015/01/books/nonfic/nonfiction-on-walter-noble-burns-lincoln-classical-music-mexico-china-buddhism-xpress-reviews/. Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BOOKCRIT)

Comment: While the "references" that have been provided certainly verify that the book ''exists'', they do ''not'' count as |reliable source coverage ''about'' him for the purposes of passing  or . Notability is ''not'' synonymous with merely existing — a writer gets an article when ''real'' media are writing ''about'' him, not just because his book happens to have a |primary source sales profile on an online bookstore or an entry in WorldCat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)