Deletion of Amy Shira Teitel

Comment: The subject meets . Source examples include: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/technology/science/historian-amy-shira-teitel-enters-adelaides-orbit-to-discuss-dynasoar-and-other-lost-secrets-of-space-race/news-story/6a86d449f45e368614c958355f213a38, http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/jewish-space-flight-historian-and-youtube-star-struggles-with-rocket-sciences-nazi-history-20160707-gq0xus.html, https://cosmosmagazine.com/society/history-is-rocket-science-to-amy-shira-teitel, http://www.popsci.com/how-space-program-evolved-into-nasa-qa
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The Amy_Shira_Teitel article clearly meets |General notability guideline and  with reliable sources by Wikipedia standards finding her significantly interesting to write about over time. Also, the number of times that she is quoted in the media over 5 years makes it clear that her book published in 2016 is not a flash in the pan (one time lucky break) but that their is a general interest in her writing. Additionally, comment about the media coverage of her book being promoted by a publicist is a red herring. The media picks and chooses which people to profile as books are released. This selection process works hand in hand with Wikipedia policy to let these secondary sources fact check and gauge whether a topic is of significant interest to have a standalone Wikipedia article. The bottomline is that the media has written about and quoted Amy Shira Teitel with depth and frequency to show that she is "worthy of notice"  and "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". Sydney Poore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PEOPLE)