Deletion of Masked Republic

Comment: The article is a stub, but the sources shown here and in the article appear to be enough to meet  to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per all. |Barely notable is still notable, and |deletion is not cleanup. &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:IFINDOUBTCREATE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: The article definitely passes (The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself),  (If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy), , etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEBCRIT||WP:PRODUCT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Went through every google result (seven pages) and four pages of google news results and didn't find a single article actually covering the company. Every result was either promotional, a press release, or sponsorship related. Given that one of the references is actually a shopping page for women's athletic wear (mostly new balance and bally brands), perhaps another review of the company's coverage is in order. Even a link provided in the above comments is to a press release. Regurgitated press releases is not significant coverage. Other than the Vice article, which is really about a single event, there's nothing. The Philly.com is a wrestling fan blogpost (and is also related to a single event). This page fails on , ,  and more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG)