Deletion of FUBAR

Comment: The point of  is just navigational: "''In Wikipedia, things are grouped into articles based on what they are, not what they are called by.''".  It therefore not a reason to delete.  Note that this title is used for http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=860DghKLFnoC a book of WW2 slang.  Is this the topic that the reader is expecting?  The existence of the book indicates that the title ought to lead somewhere and figuring out what that is is not a deletion matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: FUBAR is more of a ''concept'' than that of the ''word'', and therefore is not covered by  (see #Major_differences). Also number of redirects to this page illustrates another major difference of article (per ): that "synonyms are ... duplicate articles that should be merged
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:DICDEF||WP:DICDEF)