Deletion of Horse's Ghost

Comment: Stub articles are fine, and form an important part of the Project.  See, as well, , where the "stub" argument is cited as an "argument to avoid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: In addition to the source already in the article, there is discussion of this American Indian chief http://books.google.com.au/books?id=fp4Vn1TJJ_gC&pg=PA774&dq=Horse%27s+Ghost+indian&hl=en&ei=4sc8TaqPDdDXcbea4b0J&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEIQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Horse%27s%20Ghost%20indian&f=false here and http://books.google.com.au/books?id=oODHaHr674oC&pg=PA138&dq=Horse%27s+Ghost+indian&hl=en&ei=4sc8TaqPDdDXcbea4b0J&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE0Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q&f=false here.  The photo itself also counts as significant coverage in a reliable source, being a documented part of a historically significant collection of images.  The topic therefore has significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources and should be kept as passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)