Deletion of Girls At The Cairo National Stadium (3rd nomination)

Comment: Definitely fails . If this were a "cultural phenomenon" as proferred, wouldn't there be some other sources somewhere???  Now in it's 3rd AfD, the article still does not pass  or F... and am I not alone in thinking for a major contributor (and his socks) to be adding an article about his own video, and then sourcing it back to his articles and his blogs is a major violation of ? The only possible source that (barely) squeeks past  is the article in the http://www.dailystaregypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=759 Daily Star... but even then, it quotes Kamer's own words, reports Kamer made a video, repeats Kamer's opinions, and reports the opinions of three persons other than Kamer. Hardly a "cultural phenomenon", and hardly notable. If it were, there would a lot more coverage other than his own. With similar points brought up at the first 2 AfD's, you'd think this would have been addressed. I was one who voted keep in the 2nd AfD, but with the article not being better sourced in the last 4 weeks, with the continued  violations, I have now changed my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:NF||WP:COI||WP:RS||WP:COI)

Comment: Struck my salt. I voted to keep at the 2nd AfD. Links shared at this AfD showed me the specific problem with the . Was hoping to see the artcle improved per . It has not been. How much time does the author need
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NPOV)