Deletion of David Michigan (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails . \\\Septrillion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there's not enough media coverage - fails . The argued social media following and viral nature of his videos only translate to solid notability when also covered by reliable mainstream sources, or through some accepted and notable metric related to influence. I don't see that here. I'm on the fence with the salt - the deletion log for both versions of names should probably be enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this text of unadulterated |promotion about a subject distinctly failing ,  (do not even try),  (I'm going by stated assertions here), and . |Will the check clear
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:NBIO||WP:NMODEL||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:NATHLETE||WP:PAID)

Comment: subject fails , , and . The SIGCOV argument is pertinent to WP:GNG arguments, as it is the depth, quality, and independence of the source that matters, not the number of sources cited. Corroborating what
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:ENT||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: salt''': does not meet ; promo 'cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)