Deletion of BioCode

Comment: The subject's lack of wider notability does not mean that it is not ''important'' in its host science, i.e. Biology. It concerns the naming of "all kinds of organisms, whether eukaryotic or prokaryotic, fossil or non-fossil, and of fossil traces of organism, that are established (i.e., validly published or made available) and shall govern the choice when names compete among themselves or with earlier names. They shall also, and without limitation of date, provide for the establishment of co-ordinate names within rank groups, for the protection of names, as well as for their correct form." (http://www.bgbm.org/biodivinf/docs/biocode2011/biocode2.html Source) A world co-ordinated project towards having a unifying nomenclature in a major science is mighty important. The article, however, does a severe injustice to its subject: It's thrown together with less care than the contents of a garbage bin. And, since the BioCode project itself is still in draft form, perhaps the best way forward is |merciful euthanasia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)