Deletion of Anne Watson

Comment: article could use some cleanup and further expansion, not deletion, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: fails to pass  or  (all sources so far appear trivial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: At 7K, Montpelier is not large enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability per  #2 just for existing, but the sourcing here is not strong enough to get her over the "more notable than the norm among a ''not'' inherently notable class of topic" hump. The slightly weird fact that the ''Seattle Times'' would reprint a wire service article about a municipal election in ''Vermont'' admittedly ''starts'' down the path toward making her more notable than the norm — but it doesn't ''finish'' that race all by itself as the article's ''only'' piece of more than just  local coverage. Passing GNG is not just a question of whether the number of reliable sources in the article exceeds one, because ''every'' mayor of ''everywhere'' can ''always'' show n>1 sources — it's a question of the range and depth and volume of sourcing that can be shown, as well as the strength of the basic notability claim that the sources are supporting, but the range and depth and volume of sources shown here are ''not'' unusual enough to make a smalltown mayor a special case over and above most other smalltown mayors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: U|Domdeparis}} your nom doe not mention any sort of  search. What sort of search did you do
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)