Deletion of Bullshido.net (3rd nomination)

Comment: worst case scenario we should  and keep because it's the second most popular martial arts website in the entire universe
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: per otability (web)|Notability (web), which states that an article should be kept if "the content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." For "multiple," we have two. For "non-trivial," we have none. You can't write an article if it has no ''significant'' coverage from eliable sources|Reliable sources.What does not count is "trivial coverage, such as (1) newspaper articles that simply report the Internet address, (2) newspaper articles that simply report the times at which such content is updated or made available, (3) a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of Internet addresses and site or (4) content descriptions in Internet directories or online stores
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:R)

Comment: per  as this article clearly is improving the quality of Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: non notable, fails  and no significant coverage otherwise. easy delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)