Deletion of Greg Sayers

Comment: Being a ''local'' councillor in a suburb is not an automatic  freebie (and neither is getting reelected to a second term), being chairman of a company (even a notable/famous company) is not an automatic pass over our inclusion rules for businesspeople if the sourcing for it isn't particularly strong, and the sourcing here is ''far'' too reliant on |primary sources and social media posts, with not even ''close'' to enough |reliable source coverage to meet . None of this, neither the sourcing nor the substance, is enough — and articles which need a swarm of sockpuppets to come Defend Their Ramparts! always get an automatic side-eye
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: I've had a look through the sources and this person fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Is a notable political figure. Am well convinced the article passes all the criteria for , , and . Special:Contributions/222.153.158.125|222.153.158.125
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NBIO||WP:GNG)