Deletion of Travel Cuts

Comment: appears to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: satisfies , information is verifiable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:V)

Comment: appears to satisfy  which is not policy but does not need to be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Large, important and verifiable corporation, and the lawsuits make the article a lot more informative than most  violators
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Article satifies wikipedia NPOV guidelines and  as well all information is factual and verified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: What the wha??? This is a Canada-wide travel agency that has expanded beyond locations at university campuses. There are even offices overseas (I recall there is one in London, assuming it's still there). Certainly satisfies the criteria of . I fail to see the vanity, and the basis of non-notability mystifies me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)