Deletion of Major Matt Mason (film)

Comment: and/or partial '''redirect''' to parent article.  Too much of a  event to have a standalone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: and partial '''merge''' to Major Matt Mason as suggested above. The topic of this planned 3D film has enough sourcability to, per |policy, at least be mentioned in that article... even though, per the |guideline for unmade films, it's far |Too Soon for a separate article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:FUTURE||WP:NFF||WP:NYF)

Comment: I don't really know, but isn't there like enough coverage on this movie for it to deserve it's own article? It seems quite for certain that this movie is going to come to fruition, based on some of the sources I can findhttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/tom-hanks-playtone-productions-announces-197012. I can find lots of citations. It passes , right? I would say yes, according to policy on future events. It also meets  too, don't you agree
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:GNG)

Comment: based on the guidance from  which identifies that films that have not commenced principal photography should not have their own article.  No prejudice to recreation when it meets the guidelines for inclusion as a standalone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: and/or '''Redirect''' as above and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)