Deletion of INTP

Comment: just looking through the articles, if they are kept they require massive cleanup by someone with access to the appropriate sources, there are pages and pages worth of |original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: doesn't violate  at all. It would be much more accurate if the article stated them as opinions not fact, and that could be argued as a violation of , but I don't think having a few examples around hurts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: and clean up. Not |hopeless. Passes : the basic info is cited using |reliable sources, though the uncited |original research and/or |copyright violations certainly need to be removed. Needing clean up is not a criterion for Afd, nor is "pseudoscience". And to the nom, having an MBTI box on one's page doesn't automatically indicate that someone commenting here is using  as an argument. Only the comments on this page should be taken into account
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:HOPELESS||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:COPYVIO||WP:ILIKEIT)