Deletion of Churnalism

Comment: well referenced article. Re: "Tags for cleanup, etc., been upf or a while without improvement." an AfD is not the place to clean up an article, per  and . http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS321US321&q=Churnalism 13,500 articles on google, the first is BBC, second in Guardian; http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Churnalism&cf=all 68 google news hits in including Globe and mail, The Australian; http://books.google.com/books?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Churnalism&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np 39 google books including a handbook on journalism.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per . As Cnilep points out, nearly all references mention the coining by Nick Davies, which strongly implies that this is both new (as in NEOlogism) and not yet widely accepted as a word that people are expected to recognise. It may become widely used, but more likely will die out as memory of Davies' book fades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)