Deletion of Nicholas Campion

Comment: I'm not convinced that he passes , but he seems to have a high enough profile as an astrologer to pass  and . In particular I just added to the article five reliable sources, some in high profile international newspapers, concerning his astrological books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: appears to pass , criterium 3 "''The person has created...a collective body of work, that has been the subject of... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews''" /  criterium 4 "''The person's work (or works)... has won significant critical attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I was thinking not to vote, but I got interested in the topic and made a little research. My conclusion is that he meets  by achieving criteria 3: "The person has created... a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject... of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Also, I read some reviews and found that he meets criteria 4: "The person's work... has won significant critical attention." I consider this to be enough to showcase notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: There may not be enough information about him to get a good or featured article, but he appears to have gained some sort of notability to have an article written of him. As demonstrated by a few others, he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I would also suggest that there might have been some COI editing around this person - in the past, I suspected that a couple of |SPAs seemed to focus on introducing content that sets Campion in a positive light - but I haven't noticed any recently. Just a heads-up
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)