Deletion of Color of Change

Comment: Complete  here. Just click on the Google News link at the top of this AFD and you'll find a multitude of reliable sources covering the subject, just in the last month. Yes, our article needs major cleanup and cites CoC's own website too much (I added a third-party tag) but that's no basis for deletion. Just browsing through the cited sources I found the following news stories with significant coverage: https://nonprofitquarterly.org/policysocial-context/20238-success-in-advocacy-a-conversation-with-colorofchangeorgs-gabriel-rey-goodlatte.html Nonprofit Quarterly, http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/president-obama-insult-glenn-beck-advertisers-boycotting-show-article-1.396765#ixzz0OXspX1PF NY Daily News, http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Louisiana-s-Jena-Six-beating-case-galvanizes-2539458.php SF Chronicle, http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-jena_bdnov11-story.html#page=1 Chicago Tribune, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/08/pat-buchanan-msnbc-book-controversy_n_1081622.html HuffPo, http://www.mintpressnews.com/a-win-for-civil-society-as-corporations-divest-from-private-prison-industry/190258/ MintPress, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/snl-lorne-michaels-asked-by-652441 Hollywood Reporter, http://blog.seattlepi.com/techchron/2014/07/03/fight-over-net-neutrality-gets-racial/ Seattle P-I. The nomination makes clear the nominator never even skimmed the references section. This is a naughty AfD. It qualifies for |speedy keep under reasons 2 and 3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:SK)

Comment: Agree with the above. This is notable in its activities and web presence and with ample sources, even if the article needs some work to improve |said references and possibly |balance in places
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV)