Deletion of Theresa Obermeyer

Comment: Fails  by wholly lacking biographical sources addressing the totality of her life, and any event that she might have been involved in appears to fail 1E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: with an asterisk.  (Probably to the 1996 election article, though she also is mentioned in the 2004 election article.)  My impression from her preferred version of the article is that she has ceased her very public "campaign", and I am not talking about a campaign for office, but the combination of election campaigns and other public efforts to gain redress for her husband's difficulties in being admitted to the Alaska bar.  (Which may have finally been resolved one way or the other; that's not clear.)  I do not view this as a direct candidate for  because she is not a "non-public figure" -- as I note above, it's tough to be a non-public figure when you've run in eight elections -- but more like sort of a version of Wikipedia's "right to vanish" (which directly applies to editors, not articles).  In other words, ok, fine, redirect the article so it's not "live" (but remains preserved in the history), and if she doesn't run for office again and doesn't otherwise intentionally put herself in the newspapers again, it stays that way.  But if she "comes back", then someone can bring back the article too, simply by reverting the redirect and adding the "latest" to the article.  Is there already a three-letter acronym for that, or did I just make it up
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: Falls short of  as an unelected candidate lacking significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Marginal notability, coverage is mostly routine coverage of local politics, and as the subject requests deletion,  takes effect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPDELETE)

Comment: this discussion should be closed early. It's |snowing in Alaska
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Not because someone doesn't like their own article, which isn't policy and would set a poor precedent if we allowed it here, but simply because the subject fails the general notability guidelines set out in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Subject is borderline notable at best and fails  on a good day. One of those "lulz" biographies intended to disparage the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per sources indicated above by Fram and Murry1975. Passes . Wishes of the subject irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)