Deletion of First Fruits of Zion

Comment: I'm unable to find any |reliable sources about the man. He doesn't seem to meet any part of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: these self-promotional anity stubs filled with misleading gobbledygook about "Judaism" and "Torah" when they are only a cheap recruiting piece to get ignorant people to convert to a small unheard of non-mainstream Christian cult. Pathetic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The article currently shows only links to personal and organizational web sites, none of which are acceptable evidence of |notability per  and . We have deleted numerous articles on mainstream rabbis, ministers, etc., including many who have self-published books, on a very similar portfolio. It's been well-established over many precedents that simply being ordained or being a leader of a congregation or organization isn't enough, and self-published books aren't independent evidence of notability. Independent sources -- newspaper articles, journals of notable religious organizations, books published by known religious or other publishers, etc., are needed. If these aren't forthcoming, '''delete'''. The organization's POV is irrelevant here. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: per Shirahadasha, not every clergyperson or organization is notable enough to merit an article at least according to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)