Deletion of Postcardware

Comment: to shareware. Injoke? I guess that is one way to say . But this is a verifiable form of shareware license https://books.google.com/books?id=g80P_4v4QbIC&pg=PA404&lpg=PA404&dq=postcardware+history+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=6pgmvqetO7&sig=ACfU3U18Dl_EzvEzNzx-HNNT2WINoUpjOg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2waHK1rfnAhU5IjQIHcXSAQw4ChDoATAIegQIDBAB#v=onepage&q=postcardware&f=false, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=flE9lS5iVBoC&pg=PA396&dq=%22postcardware%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNp_zw7LTnAhXUnFwKHfWLB2EQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=%22postcardware%22&f=false, https://computerhistory.org/blog/the-eudora-email-client-source-code/ (the last is a blog, but by an expert, so I consider it reliable for the assertion of postcardware).  Per our policy , for verifiable material, alternatives to deletion, such as a merger, are preferred over deletion. In this case, shareware is a reasonable target. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:ATD)

Comment: per . Wiktionary has https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/postcardware this entry, so it is covered there, the appropriate wiki project for this and this answers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)