Deletion of Reactions to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake

Comment: Bad faith nom. I will propose to take some measures against the nominator so that he cannot disrupt the AfDs. This is well-sourced article documenting the international reaction to a major earthquake. We have similar articles International reactions to the 2006 Lebanon War, Reactions to the September 11, 2001 attacks etc. While this will be  type argument, but this topic is valid topic. Not only this, any this kind of topic is valid topic. The main article 2008 Sichuan earthquake is becoming too long. To maintain wikipedia's standard article size, i.e. 32 KB, this information cannot be merged. The nom is frivolous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: per nom. It's easy to rack up sources showing that multiple countries expressed sympathy for the victims of this earthquake, but harder to explain why that qualifies as an encyclopedia article. Unlike in the case of International reactions to the 2006 Lebanon War, the reactions to the earthquake are not diverse or nuanced. Also, I encourage Otolemur to |assume good faith on the part of the nominator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: This is nothing more than a #DIR|directory of ''pro forma'' announcements of sympathy. As governments and NGOs frequently make such announcements they are of little encyclopedic value. These mainly get into news stories as a local angle and into Wikipedia probably for similar motivations but also in both cases due to a lack of high-quality information on the event, thus they fill a news vacuum in the initial hours. But they have very little value to an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)