Deletion of Living Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom

Comment: This is an interesting one.  Clearly this article was created based on the long-standing article, Living Presidents of the United States.  I agree with Squeamish Ossifrage that this most likely is not OR, so the question becomes whether or not it is an "indiscriminate collection of information", which would cause it to fall into the category of |listcruft. Perhaps it is different in the UK, but in the US there is a fascination with the number of living presidents (simply do a google news search and you get hundreds of hits). A google news search of Living Prime Ministers, however, does not return anywhere near that number of hits. I'm not attempting to make an argument from the viewpoint of , but I think the Presidents article is a valid one, and to quote from OSE: "In consideration of precedent and consistency, though, identifying articles of the same nature that have been established and continue to exist on Wikipedia may provide extremely important insight into the general concept of notability ...".  It is much more developed article, but it has been around for 8 years. I'd hate to see a relatively new editor who is attempting to make contributions be discouraged. I see that the editor has an interest in UK political history, and is creating articles based on existing articles about US political history.  He has another article, List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of birth, again based on one about US Presidents, which is also in AfD (although in that instance, I think both articles, the PM and Presidents, should be deleted - I'm actually on the fence about that one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:OSE)

Comment: A notable topic such as this does not qualify as istcruft. Simply merging everything with List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom would make it too long and not as appealing. As opposed to this which covers this topic clearly and accurately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L)

Comment: it's unnecessery and useless , why should anybody want to know how many former PMs are living or not at any time? The US presidents' list should be nominated for deletion posthaste
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: It would be best to incorporate this information into the main list but that's a matter of merger not deletion.  See the  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1957292.stm BBC for evidence of notability per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)