Deletion of OWASP (2nd nomination)

Comment: blatant promo (-1)  together with borderline notability   DEPTH (+0.5). There's sources at my first AfD, may be , or just a case of all the promo needing  to start over. (Note ''many'' COI editors and SPA accounts on talk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON||WP:TNT)

Comment: OWASP's material is surely basic reference for anyone working in web development or security, so I am surprised to see the organisation here. However, an "it's notable" argument is clearly inappropriate; I have added various book and publication references into the article as references. One can also find OWASP being referenced by https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/operations/penetration-testing.html UK government advice and by https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1042221/protecting-personal-data-in-online-services-learning-from-the-mistakes-of-others.pdf the UK Information Commissioner. All in all, for me there is enough to pass  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ORGDEPTH||:WP:GNG)