Deletion of Ağcakent, Aziziye

Comment: per Dlthewave and Mangoe. Creation of microstub articles really doesn't help the encyclopaedia. The link they're referenced to is blocked by my internet provider for security reasons, but assuming this goes to a map, maps are not reliable sources for determining whether  is indeed met, so we can't even erify if they're legally recognised populated places. My vote would be different if these hadn't been batch created and we had to determine the notability of a specific place, but there's enough doubt about the information, sourcing, and whether they actually meet the SNG that we can't really keep these as standalone articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:V)

Comment: The closer should also be aware that, as well as the talk-page canvassing noted above, this AFD was ed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket#Cricket_AfDs|the cricket forum, because somehow Turkish "neighbourhoods" are related to cricket
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: per . I'm as opposed to mass creation of substubs as anyone, and I've had disagreements with several editors as a result. (I think that unless an editor can take the time to do a bit of research and create at least a genuine stub, with a couple of sources, that provides a few details about a topic, he or she should not create an article about the topic.) Nevertheless, these are verifiable places that, as Ivar the Boneful says, would not be objected to were they about tiny villages in Britain or the United States
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: these meet ; "excludes tables from establishing notability" means they are not significant coverage, it doesn't mean they can't be used to verify whether places are legally recognised and populated. The only one I'm not sure about is Söğütlü, as the source mentions two places with the same name. The Vietnamese article confuses them, which is the reason for the difference in population
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: I would support redirecting all to the list at Aziziye, per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Turkey#Mass_creation_of_village_articles|this discussion at Wikiproject Turkey. Per , notability does not guarantee an article, and many topics are best covered as a list entry. In my opinion it's a better practice to present these as a list and create standalone articles when they are ready to be expanded, rather than keeping dozens of stubs on the premise that they ''might'' be expanded in the future
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: neighborhoods / districts do not meet . There are also questions of , with the articles all being sourced to a single website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:V)