Deletion of RMS Titanic II (proposed ocean liner)

Comment: Sources would appear to fail , and a search for better ones only gave me http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/comment/4472821/A-Titanic-task.html this reference to the unrelated Replica Titanic. Fails  by a long way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems to be a perfect fit for .  Someone designed a ship in a simulation program, and put it on the internet. That does not make for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: without prejudice to the creation of an article on the ship at some point in the future ''when a contract is signed and the keel is laid''. Until then, this is in breach of  and fails  as there are no ''independent 3rd party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)