Deletion of Scooter Berry (3rd nomination)

Comment: Plethora of available sources means subject passes ; now, someone with access to the sources should add them to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: basically per Giants2008 and the sources Cbl62 has provided. Berry passes the |general notability guideline, which makes it irrelevant as to whether he passes the subject-specific guideline anyway (although a case could easily be made that basic criteria of  states that "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject" so Berry also passes NSPORTS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: over 700 articles on Google News alone, some which have specific details and feature the subject.  Widespread coverage about his college football career more than surpasses |general notability guideline even if  is not met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: I'm striking out reasons above after Cbl62 (below) found some non-routine sources out of the 700 sources (your effort is commended!). However, I'm still looking over Berry's accomplishments, and IMO its un-of-the-mill. His notability in a nutshell IMO is that he was twice named 2nd team all-Big East. He received significant coverage about comebacks from injuries, run in with the law, and academic ineligibility.  If he was a consensus All-American at least, I would have less of an issue. If he makes it into the NFL, his notability becomes less in doubt, but that is not guaranteed at this point looking at draft projections. I will invoke the "presumed" clause in GNG, "significant coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion, it is not appropriate for a stand-alone article."  It is subjective, but is allowed by GNG. and it is subject to consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: Not notable per . Berry is also unlikely to be drafted or play professionally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I suspect that more college football players prove to be notable than might be expected, due to the popularity of the sport here in the U.S. Forgetting the local West Virginia-based newspaper articles up there, the ESPN, Newsday, and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette articles show enough coverage to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)