Deletion of Skafish

Comment: per  - this was a seminal band in the history of popular music, and the article can be well-sourced very easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: A shining example of an AfD nominator who fails to understand |Deletion policy, and why it should be sanctionable to fail to make a legitimate attempt to at least confirm sourcing (in both Google news archive AND other periodical databases as sources may be offline or not indexed by Google) may exist first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Nominator appears to have a misunderstanding of #REASON and .  Even a cursory  finds the coverage the nominator claims does not exist. And being "defunct" does not make a notable topic suddenly non-notable, else we'd have to delete articles on such "defunct" music related topics like The Frug , The Monkey, or Twist (dance)|The Twist. Historical notability is quite fine with Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)