Deletion of Nselaa Ward

Comment: The article does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As others have said the sources in the article are inadequate to establish notability, thus failing . In fact quite a few of the references don’t mention the subject at all. Google searches turn up nothing helpful, mostly PR announcements, Youtube and social media. Further, there is no mention of Nselaa Ward anywhere on {{cite web |title=NOW |url=https://now.org}} site where the article states she was a “National Field Director” and, nobody with the name of “Nselaa Ward“ has ever been licensed to practice law in the United States. What I did find was an attorney named “ Nitche Selaa Ward” in Colorado,  whose profile (and certain photos online) are identical to the subject.({{cite web |title=Linkin |url=https://www.linkedin.com/in/nitche-ward-3b71b534}}, {{cite web |title=AVVO |url=https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/80202-co-nitche-ward-1844416.html}}, {{cite web |title=Search |url=https://www.google.com/search?q=Nitche+Ward&source=lmns&bih=539&biw=1242&rlz=1CATATK_enUS872&hl=en&ved=2ahUKEwj1k7vCko7oAhUnVd8KHSQFB64Q_AUoAHoECAEQAA}})There was also an article on the NOW website that mentions a Nitche Ward. Neither Nselaa Ward nor Nitche Ward have adequate sources to establish notability. Based on some Google searches, there is the possibility this article could be part of a “rebranding” campaign for the subject, IMO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: ping|AndreaPerry22}} you need to find verifiable reliable sources that are not primary sources that speak to the notability of the article subject. In other words, if there are newspaper or magazine articles that are ABOUT her (not by her); reviews of her books or creative works that are written by someone else that is published in a notable academic journal, newspaper or magazine; awards that she has received that are not from her faculty page or cv, but from an external source, etc. Do read up on ,  and other Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You should not include primary sources (written by the subject themselves), or any social media or blog sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:VERIFY)

Comment: No pass of rof. No pass of . Too overly promotional with inadequate sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: per the case made by {{u|Xxanthippe}}; {{reply|AaqibAnjum}} I'm afraid your case |falls. Please note that . Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATADD||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: ping|AndreaPerry22}}  Please read . This guideline explains the requirements for establishing notability. The subject will need several sources that meet '''all''' of the requirements mentioned: Significant coverage, Independent of the subject and from Reliable() secondary sources. Unfortunately, at the moment I don’t see any of the references that meet all of these requirements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)