Deletion of Two hundred fifty-sixth note

Comment: I see no evidence that this is original research, in fact I think it's likely that the note exists. However, there's no indication that it's ever been used, and even if it has, it's incredibly rare. I don't agree with DGG's non-abridged encyclopedia idea; we all know that the |Notability criteria means that lots of things don't get included in all fields
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as complete |original research. Source doesn't even mention any of what is said in article. Redirect not possible does to it being a non-plausible search term. Merge not possible due to the fact there are zero |reliable, third-party, sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)