Deletion of Oprahization

Comment: per otability. I clicked on the news and book links above and found lots of references to Oprahization in reliable sources. Most of the news links were pay-per-view, but http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&tbs=bks:1&&sa=X&ei=4IdlTZ6tCMqahQfFwITlBw&ved=0CCUQBSgA&q=oprahization&spell=1 all these book links are fair game for developing the article. I added information from some of the free news links, and several books, to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Cryptic; while we delete most neologisms, this one has become notable by use in |reliable secondary sources such as books and ''Time'' magazines. As Yoninah notes, a |simple search prior to nomination would have found plenty of such sources. I note that this is also up at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created/expanded_on_February_17|DYK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BEFORE)