Deletion of Jami Floyd

Comment: as subject does indeed have coverage by http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1994&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Jami+Floyd+%22%2C+%22Court+TV%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Jami+Floyd+%22%2C+%22Court+TV%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go reliable 3rd part sources, thus meeting . That she is an opinion-maker and her views are sought show her as notable. That and her http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Jami+Floyd+%22%2C+%22awards%22&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a awards show she's "major" enough for Wikipedia. Article can be improved through normal editing and |as such is no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)

Comment: I added a different bio link to the article (haven't used it as a source yet, but it's there for others to use), and there are a decent number of gbook hits mentioning her including http://books.google.com/books?id=wrkDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA25&dq=%22Jami+Floyd%22+-inpublisher:icon&lr=&as_brr=0&cd=3#v=onepage&q=%22Jami%20Floyd%22%20-inpublisher%3Aicon&f=false this, but I'm still unsure as to whether she passes  or 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)