Deletion of Louise Giblin (chemist)

Comment: This appears to be another sad case where patriarchal attitudes pushed a talented young woman out of science and then the men around her took credit for her accomplishments. But we're not here to right great wrongs, and the sources we have left from those days really don't support much, other than "she was a co-author on some related publications". We certainly don't have any sources that actually credit her as the primary inventor of similac, the strongest claim to notability in the article. The source that looks like it should be the best one, Schuman's concise history of infant formula, doesn't actually mention her (we use it in the article only for an unrelated fact about where similac got its name). This leaves us with only Rossiter (on her dinner protest) as the only secondary source; it's not enough for . And the full title of the most significant of her publications makes clear that it is only one of at least ten papers by her coauthor Bosworth (the only one credited as the inventor in the actual similac article); what makes this paper stand out among Bosworth's others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Four well-cited papers. Not sure that is enough for rof#C1. Can GNG help with baby formula sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)