Deletion of Michael John Keatinge

Comment: In previous centuries such clerical positions were far more important and influential in society than they are today. This is |not a paper encyclopaedia no other information is lost due to the inclusion of this article. With additions made by Charles Matthews I think the notability of this person is clear. One of the interesting things about early 20th century publications such as the EB1911 and the Dictionary of National Biography is how many entries there are for clerics of all denominations. This I think reflects the prominence that clerics had in previous centuries, and why articles such as this one is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: before Roman Catholics got the vote in 1829 and disestablishment in the Victorian era, the Church of Ireland was ''the'' official church, so that an Archdeacon c. 1827 was a pretty important person, |already on the margin of notability. That this man was frequently quoted and is listed support a claim of notability. FWIW, I have grandparents who were CI and RC, two of whom even married
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE)

Comment: per Charles Matthews. Deans are usually, but not necessarily, notable. But this one passes , as demonstrated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)