Deletion of Monsters and Critics (2nd nomination)

Comment: sorry, but I'm not seeing how it meets  or the general guideline, even after looking at the Google Books results; every result I see has "according to Monsters and Critics...", which is not enough in my view
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per meeting  via . Note  is a descriptor of what constitutes web-specific content, and does itself actually offer criteria for determining a website's notability. For that we use the GNG in determining the notability. Aside from that, as the nomiator has already stated that Monters and Critics is a Relable Source, it would seem prudent to keep and expand the article so that our readers, in seeing it used as a reference, would then be able to read an article about THIS reliable source so as to better understand what the site offers and what makes it reliable. Further, in the assertion that it has not been improved in 3+ years, with respects, I find OEFFORT to be an unconvincing argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:WEB||WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: as a non-notable site. Doesn't stand up to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)