Deletion of Wikipedia community

Comment: to Wikipedia#This_is_a_free_encyclopedia_where_anyone_can_edit. The community maintaining an article on the community fails , but as QuackGuru wrote, it's notable enough so we can't leave it deleted. There's also several links to this page on major Wikipedia pages, such as Criticism of Wikipedia, Reliability of Wikipedia, and Wikipedia
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO)

Comment: Uh... can -any- of the "Delete" people please address what in policy dictates your deletion comment...? as stupid as it sounds, the "group" now passes muster for  and , so is a '''Keep'''. Again, another thing that will only grow more notable in time, beyond that notability that already passes muster. What is this demented urge to scrub all articles about/possibly about Wikipedia editors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ATT)

Comment: to project space. As an article, it looks like it must fail  until some later time, and it is far more mired in conflict of interest issues than other Wikipedia articles about Wikipedia. It could always be moved back in the future if it looks like it is possible to properly source it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)

Comment: with Wikipedia or '''Delete''' because there's not enough notability specifically on the community and, even if there was, there would be  issues with only the community editing the article. The only thing that has changed, in my opinion, is the increase of vandalism in the "see also" section to promote this article. Seriously, what does this directly have to do with wiki
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)