Deletion of Paul Christoforo

Comment: possible  G10, classic 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Non-notable BLP. Also violates  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Intuitively, one very small company's PR implosion isn't noteworthy, even if it's getting temporary press in gaming/tech media (and some outside). I also agree with the  complaint. At best this should be heavily abridged and moved into the Penny Arcade article, as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: from : ''"Being in the news does not in itself mean that someone should be the subject of a Wikipedia article. If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them."'' I think this applies here. Even if the incident were notable (and I'm not conceding that it is), this individual doesn't meet general notability guidelines, and shouldn't have an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Article and person are not noteworthy (clearly part of a backlash resulting from one incident, which (probably) originated from Reddit). Request for deletion. Refer to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: with Penny Arcade (webcomic). Obviously not something that should be a standalone article (no argument with  being cited). But the issue has gotten some mainstream press with http://ingame.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/27/9745218-jilted-gamer-teaches-vendor-price-of-rudeness MSNBC, so a short write-up of the whole issue is appropriate. And since it was Penny Arcade that first latched on to the issue and sent it on its way to becoming viral, that would be the most appropriate merge target
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Obviously  and a potential  violation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP)

Comment: textbook case of . This person is not notable by Wikipedia's guidelines. We should not have an article on every person who has briefly been the focus of the Internet's attention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The subject has become an almost instant meme and has received significant coverage by reputable sources. It does, however, need to be re-written so as to be encyclopedic and to meet . As currently written, it seems to be a pile on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I'm just going to play devil's advocate for a second here. The one argument that has come up several times (including by myself) has been that this matches  and I haven't seen anyone even attempt to contest that, much less do it well. Does anyone have a comment on why it doesn't match/should be ignored? If I could be convinced of that, I would probably be willing to back down, but until that happens, I don't see how any closing admin could ignore that point, and it's not even worth attempting to debate this further until that has been covered. (Note: I'm not advocating closing early, just saying "we're wasting time here if we don't talk about this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: it's the definition of . Nobody's going to know who this guy is in a year, and '''notability is not temporary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This man is not significant. The issue will likely not be a lasting piece of news, or mentioned much in a few weeks' time. If it is, then  will no longer apply. News outlets are keen to pick up any article they can find, and it is not surprising that an isolate news event generate thousands of brief news articles and discussions. Having such large amounts of web pages on a single day's news story does not make this person any more important. Finally, being popular with Reddit, Know Your Meme or 4chan is hardly a basis for encyclopedic notability! Special:Contributions/2.27.245.89|2.27.245.89
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Article is some sort of campaign based on original research to smear someone or something; it is not a biography of a notable person. The sources are simply excited echoes of |a single incident and while the sources show there is a news event, there is no evidence of |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:N)