Deletion of Ashkenazi intelligence (3rd)

Comment: after having done thought, I believe the subject matter is unquestionably encyclopedic. As to whether the sources are good enough to keep the article, I believe the answer is yes (with apologies to L0b0t) - several mainstream media articles and academic work are enough to write a coherent article. And, after reading most delete arguments on previous AFD's, most seem to be more offended by the subject matter than anything (i.e., 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Sufficient sources to establish notability. In response to Gilisa, it's not our place to judge whether anything is bad science, weak arguments, etc. We're not posting essays here; that would violate . The fact we don't like a particular subject is irrelevant. If there are issues with how this article is written, etc. this isn't the forum for that discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)