Deletion of Testatika (3rd nomination)

Comment: under ,  and  concerns. Although the article appears to be well-referenced, many of the citations do not actually back up the statements in the article. Many fall into a category of "this machine utilises Principle Xref"; however the reference is not to the Testatika's utilisation of Principle X, but to material on X itself. For example
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: The sources here are all unreliable and unreputable. This is in contradiction to  and furthermore, does not follow the precedent of the Pseudoscience ArbCom case (/PS). Particularly, the sources would not be Acceptable Sources per ARB/PS even if they were Reliable Sources; as they are neither, and it appears that no suitable references exist, the topic is not notable per the Wikipedia definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:ARB)