Deletion of Kiera King

Comment: Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#PORNBIO again|This discussion has been inactive for over a month and no changes have been made to , which is still a valid guideline on WP. Kiera King has been nominated for two XBIZ Awards for "New Starlet of the Year" in 2010 and "Best Supporting Actress" in 2014. Both of those are well-known and significant industry awards and none of them are scene-related. One of those awards is still pending, so lets not forget that there is a possibility that she might actually win it. Regardless of whether she wins or not, two individual performer award nominations are sufficient. The consensus established by Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)/Archive 2012#Newcomer awards should be excluded|this discussion concludes that newcomer awards in pornography such as the XBIZ Award for New Starlet of the Year are notable. Here is an Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capri Anderson (3rd nomination)|AfD for Capri Anderson which concluded that a Best Supporting Actress award is also notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: It's one thing to get nominated for major awards by major independent nominators, e.g. if you're repeatedly on the Nobel Committee's short list of 300 people for the Nobel Prize.  It's another thing for small-name awards when we don't have solid evidence about who does the nominating.  For some awards, anyone can do the nominating, so a loose reading of WP:ANYBIO would mean that anyone could self-nominate until they'd passed the WP:ANYBIO standards.  We shouldn't have an article unless in the future she clearly passes the standard of getting multiple independent reliable sources, or unless she ends up doing something else that makes her clearly notable, like qualifying under  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ATHLETE)