Deletion of List of international organizations

Comment: per .  The singular fact that an organization operates over international borders does not make it notable.  In this day and age, there must be hundreds of thousands of "organizations" which could appear in this list, and the vast majority would be non-notable.  This list is as notable as List of organizations with buildings built of brick
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Wikipedia expects lists such as this to remain incomplete - see Wikipedia:Incomplete lists. Omissions and inaccuracies call for expansion and correction rather than for wholesale deletion. If the article seems too long, we can split it per  into a structure as used by List of acronyms and initialisms. We could address concerns about spam-magnetism by requiring that new additions link to existing Wikipedia articles. (Compare , which states: "... rather than using red links in lists, disambiguation pages or templates as an article creation guide, editors are encouraged to write the article first ...".) While some readers may see no point in such a list, others will treasure it for its role as an ordered, alphabeticized repository expressing the richness, range and variety of international organizations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT||WP:REDLINK)

Comment: nebulous inclusion criterion, so it's hard to see how this list can avoid issues like |being original research, being |a mere directory and being too vast to be of any conceivable use to anyone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: an |ugly mess, but worth rescuing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UGLY)

Comment: The fact that it's incomplete is not justification for deleting the list.  The fact that an individual organization itself is controversial (or n-n) is not reason to exclude it from the list.  I can't find any WP guidelines for the criteria for including a "List Of..." article, but lacking policy in this area, I'll default to  and suggest that if we can have lists of episodes in a season of a TV show, or a List of sovereign states, I can't imagine why this list shouldn't exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)