Deletion of Codewars

Comment: I won't give a keep or delete argument here, but I will say this about the statement Newslinger made: "The Forbes.com article is not |independent and |not a reliable source, since it's an interview with a company co-counder written by a Forbes contributor."... Wait a minute, so '''just simply the facts''' that the article is an '''interview''' with a person from the company and it was written by a '''person whose not closely related to the subject''' (one of the three requirements for meeting WP:INDEPENDENT) and contributed the article to a source '''also not related to the subject and thus third party''' where, unlike a self-published source, '''you actually have to go through a very strict checking process''' to have your article qualify for publication in the source (gee, kinda like |AN ACTUAL RELIABLE SOURCE, and BTW, whoever did the page Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources, it should've been obvious to you that articles from Forbes.com '''can't count as self-published because,''' for one, the contributors are having another party publish their piece with '''professional verification''', something '''you even stated''' when you said "its authors are professionally vetted." It's not like Blogspot or Wordpress pages) makes the source '''unreliable and not independent?'''................. What kind of backwards logic is this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:PUS||WP:RS)

Comment: Sufficient notability to establish article. The Forbes references is a \sites subdomain for web hosting, and is not reliable. There is sufficient coverage in other small references to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: No indications of notability. Its a startup that raised funding - just like every other startup. This does not make it notable and Wikipedia is not a platform to promote a company/idea. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability and fails  and (more usually) , specifically they are not intellectually independent. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)