Deletion of Sunil Padwal

Comment: the article is a true accident scene but there are little rays of sunshine that could make for a good article. It will need a complete rewrite and better sourcing but the sources are out there to prove otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per  and . There is significant coverage in public media. {{reply|SahilSahadevan}} We can remove uncited information
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: significant amounts were |copy-pasted from online gallery bios, so I've removed these promotional paragraphs. He won awards in the 1990s, though I'm not in a position to decide whether they were important awards - they seem to be awards for up-and-coming artists, so maybe he hasn't 'come' yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: I agree the article wasn't good, but Padwal's work (particularly his 2008 Mumbai solo show) had multiple lengthy reviews. His other exhibitions have had some coverage, though several (as the nominator says) are mainly interview format. Meets the very minimum for  and I suspect (though I haven't been able to do an in-depth search) he may be one of India's more notable contemporary artists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)