Deletion of List of atheist Nobel laureates (2nd nomination)

Comment: While I really don't care for the "play until you win!" mentality of re-nominating articles for which you are dissatisfied with the first outcome, I think that all of these really do need to go. These are unencyclopedic and the inclusion critera if murky at best, leading to  problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:NOT#DIR|Wikipedia is not a directory of loosely-associated topics (and in this case, religion and being a Nobel laureate is even less than loosely associated). The Nobel laureates on these lists have nothing in common other than coincidently having the same religion/non-religion/philosophy. And to preclude "oh but it's well sourced" - doesn't matter, the design of these lists is fundamentally flawed, and it's still |synthesis of published material, with the possible goal to advance a position. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: per the above, and please stop trying to raise procedural concerns since |Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BURO)

Comment: 1.''' Walton closed List of atheist Nobel laureates AfD#1 and if he does not want to speedy delete this AfD (see his post above), that pretty much resolves the speedy delete issue. '''2.''' The trouble I have with these list is that the  does not relate to their being atheist, Christian, Hindu, Humanist, Jewish, Muslim, etc.  The  goes to their being Nobel laureates and we already have such a list.  A list of Nobel laureates whose receipt of the Nobel Prize was based in part on their being atheist, Christian, Hindu, Humanist, Jewish, Muslim, etc as confirmed by  may be a viable list. However, these two-criterion lists seem to piggyback on the notability of one of the criteria (Nobel Prize) as a pretext to form a list composted of the second criteria (atheist, Christian, Hindu, Humanist, Jewish, Muslim, etc.) where (i) the second criteria lacks a sufficient  relevance connection to the first criteria and (ii) the second criteria lacks sufficient  material on which to base a list membership criteria on its own merits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS)