Deletion of Balloon boy hoax (2nd nomination)

Comment: The event is surely notable because not only was the hoax covered and revealed internationally, but the following court case, and criticism of media coverage is even discussed and sourced in the current article, which fulfills 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)

Comment: This article needs work but it's well-sourced by |verifiable, |reliable |secondary sources, and more than satisfies . The policy the nominator cites, , also states events that are "very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards" are usually considered notable, and this event qualifies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG||WP:EVENTS)

Comment: Note that  is only 1 of the 5 total factors that  recommends considering
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT||WP:EVENT)