Deletion of South Korean cultural claims (2nd nomination)

Comment: Unreadable, worthless piece of POV drivel. Even if the title and scope of the article didn't already implicitly contain a POV-forkish/ perspective, the article would still be factually unsalvagable: given the present state of our Japanese and Korean editor population and the intensity of POV-warring in that field, there is not the slightest chance that we can get anything remotely adequate written on such a topic within the next thousand years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Per , , erifiability, , . This article is a collection of internet rumours and fringe theories claimed by individuals or individual organizations, blog entries, posts in internet forums, youtube videos, and other non-reliable sources. Based on such sources, the article engages in original research and synthesization. Also, I believe many issues in this article can be much better covered in Anti-Korean sentiment, another article created by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:RS)

Comment: I've said enough rationales why the article compiled with  and rumors should be deleted. There is no evidence that majority of South Koreans culturally claim such rumors which have been actually coined by Japanese and Chinese based on their anti-Korean sentiment. Moreover, given that any trying to clean up the article and to make  is impossible because many single purpose accounts refuse to cooperate but even try to hold irrelevant matters (such as Aesop's fables) and unreferenced disdainful allegations (governmental involvement). Some of contents should be integrated to Anti-Korean sentiment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:NPOV)

Comment: There is active ing at 2channel targeting this article, this AfD and some of the involved editors.http://society6.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/korea/1218372119/ Visual evidence: http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capturekp1.jpg http://img381.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capture1mt3.jpg http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capture3id2.jpg http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=capture4gx6.jpg
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: without some substantial |reliable sources I do not think it is possible to write an |encyclopaedia article about this kind of largely internet based rumour/meme/argument whilst still presenting the information in a |neutral way and keeping the article free of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:5P||WP:NPOV||WP:OR)