Deletion of Marilyn Leask

Comment: Just passes rof on GS cites (maybe a bit oo soon). The professional section is written atrociously and needs revision
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: Worthy of being kept. Clearly, satisfies . Not sure about  but i think it does. Slightly misses out on  but i think the sum total is enough to justify her notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I am satisfied now that they meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: per  and  C1.  When proposed for AfD, I think there was a reasonable case for , but this no longer applies after  by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF||WP:TNT||WP:HEY)

Comment: WP:DINC. Appears to pass both  (reviews including https://www.jstor.org/stable/40573586 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3622044 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3121630 https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.10.3.367.3501) and #C1 (four pubs with over 100 cites on Google Scholar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)