Deletion of Pakophilia

Comment: Actually the nominator seems to be right, the title of this article itself seems to be a neologism that doesn't have much coverage in  (as a term, I mean). However, the concept of Pro-Pakistan sentiment certainly would have enough coverage in mainstream sources to warrant an article. I'm neutral on this. This article can be moved to Pro-Pakistan sentiment or be deleted and a fresh article can be started on Pro-Pakistan sentiment, which as Pseudofusulina suggests, could talk about food, poetry, textiles and even Pakistani music (for example people like Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan who have had a profound influence on eastern music throughout the world. So I don't really mind - in both cases, a new article called "Pro-Pakistan sentiment" awaits to be created, either by this being moved to that title or a fresh start
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: obviously a |neologism, though a nice idea! Unfortunately I can't see any evidence of common usage other than WP mirror sites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: fails , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEO||WP:OR)

Comment: as this fails  and is  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEO||WP:NOR)