Deletion of Sagetae

Comment: Until some sources are added referring the the views of modern academic commentators, I must regard this as , trying to draw together two distinct Scythian tribes as if they were one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: bullshit 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: I've removed the etymology-section of the article, per non-
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as , , use of unreliable PRIMARY sources (ancient historians and the bible), and  of Thyssagetae and Massagetae that this article attempts to speculate on their origins
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY||WP:OR||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Smells like . Getae seems to be the real root here, and already mentions Massagetae and Thyssagetae.  The Sagetae term only shows up in searches because the Google book OCR output has the hyphenated word Mas-sagetae
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP:OR|speculative |pseudo-history doesn't really belong here, and without the extensive etymology section, its just a dictionary definition of a specialist word. And |Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Also the sources are suspect, if the author of the sources used is also the inventor of the word, then there is a  failing as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:DICTDEF||WP:GNG)

Comment: We might have a clear case of , here. :-) Let us all gear down. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:DONTBITE)