Deletion of Hollywood marriage

Comment: provisional that the terrible list stays deleted. A http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Hollywood+marriage%22 Gbooks search returns 550 hits. ''Abundance'' of sources. From the first 10 hits I picked four sources which I added to the article.  It's a real shame that people find time to comment on AfDs, voting delete due to "lack of sources", without taking that marginally extra effort to actually look for some sources - grossly violating  - ''deletion is the last resort''.  Listing and categorizing a lot of celebrity marriages into "short", "medium" etc is a terrible idea, from  concerns - and the list should stay deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BLP)

Comment: Back to keep per new sourcing)  the term "Hollywood marriage" does see a lot of use http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Hollywood+marriage%22&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8 Google, http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Hollywood%20marriage%22&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&oe=utf8&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wn Google News, and http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Hollywood%20marriage%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf8&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US&tab=np Google Books. Strongly suggest that sense of OR be removed through leanup and article receive proper sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)