Deletion of August Gebert

Comment: Please read and follow  and let us know that there are insufficient refs at Google Books, Google Scholar, and Google News archive before nominating a bio for deletion. Please do not cite the number of Google hits you found (whether large or small), because Google includes many nor-reliable sources and mirrors of Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: nbsp; The claim that an article does not make a claim of notability is an assertion against content.&nbsp; Content policies are not generally involved with eletion policy|deletion policy&mdash;deletion criteria exist if the entire content fails the content policies (WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV), or the entire content falls into hat Wikipedia is not.&nbsp; The common misconception regarding the claim of notability comes from one of the speedy deletion criteria, #A7|A7, but A7 makes it clear that WP:Notability is a higher and different standard.&nbsp; '''WP:Notability for a topic exists independently of both the existence of an article on Wikipedia and the content of such an article.'''&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:W||WP:CSD)

Comment: It's a case of "what's to keep?". There is no notable content in the article itself. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)