Deletion of Genesis 3D (film)

Comment: per being |TOO SOON. While searches show the topic can |actually be | set with proper sources,http://www.ipanews.com/new-creation-film-features-3d-technology/http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/06/creationist-filmmakers-who-hope-to-debunk-evolution-with-genesis-3d-movie-have-some-major-announcements/https://www.google.com/search?q=Genesis+3D+Strean&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjcwqmY3evKAhVQxGMKHQ79CZ8Q_AUIBigA&biw=1024&bih=713&dpr=1.25 we have no confirmation of release, and most of the better available sources appear to be three-years-old. I found no new news. We might allow the article to be |recreated and properly sourced when we have confirmation of release AND/OR sources to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYF||WP:ATD||WP:IMPROVE||WP:REFUND||WP:NFF)

Comment: for lack of notability and for failing GNG and NFILMS. Whatever it will be released in months, in years or maybe never is the minor issue here compared to the lack of reliable coverage. Per , "the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred", and this is not the case. Considering the very little interest the film production raised in the last two years, even when released the film would very likely fail , so the argument "producer says it's 90% completed!" carries no weight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:NFILMS)