Deletion of Marion Kozak

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I'm surprised nobody has remembered or seen reason to mention Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Miliband - it was only six months ago. Though I seem to remember that, even though it covered much of the same information, that article as being rather different from this on one, so I don't think we are in  territory. Also, from a quick search back then and a quicker recap now, there are enough mentions of her (under both maiden and married names) on GScholar to suggest that she had scholarly influence that went well beyond just being her husband's wife and her sons' mother - however, there seem to be few if any explicit citations of publications by her, so (until someone, probably some years from now, researches that aspect of her life) it may not count all that much towards verifiable notability separate from that of her husband. I get the impression that that may be the way she wants it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: Because: '''1''' Firstly this article was created ''less'' than 24 hours ago and has not been reviewed and read by more experts in this field to get their input, so this nomination is far too hasty. '''2''' Some users are involved in all sorts of ongoing disputes about the Milibands and seem to be conducting a campaign (vendetta would be a better word) on WP against the Milibands, often getting into disputes about the levels of their "Jewishness" or not, for unknown reasons in violation of  and . '''3''' The article cites plentiful independent  and  that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the subject is obviously by now the matriarch of a British political dynasty, especially since the 2010 rise of Ed Miliband to become leader of the UK Opposition. Since then, from all the media scrutiny and press coverage of her it emerges that she was very clearly a full partner with her famous husband Marxist scholar Ralph Miliband and has played a key role in the lives and political development of her two famous sons, Ed Miliband and David Miliband, who are at the apex of the leadership of the UK's Labour Party at the present time. '''4''' It's facetious and absurd to say, oh la-dee-da, she is just a "mother of two, spouse on one" as if she was the lowly washerwoman or maid. One could say the same thing for Napoleon's mother Letizia Ramolino that she was "just a mother and wife." Same goes for Sara Roosevelt FDR's mother, all she was was just a "mother and wife" -- until FDR rose to fame -- but she gets an article no matter that she did "nothing more" than support FDR to the hilt, and as later researchers have uncovered, her role in directing his political career as long as she lived. So Letizia Ramolino, Sara Roosevelt, and other such "mothers and wives" -- eventually recognized and acknowledged as matriarchs and progenitors -- eventually get WP articles about themselves because with closer scrutiny and research ('''today, good journalism does in days and weeks, what used to take scholars centuries to uncover and ''admit'' '''). '''5''' Thus it becomes very clear she has and does play an absolute key role in the life and career of her family's (mostly Marxist and Socialist) ideology, politics and impact on British society and the world (her son David was the British Foreign Secretary in the previous Labour government), that anyone can see for themselves by just reading the articles cited in the article's references, and there are are many more like this devoted to her role and influence. '''6''' There are other factors that make Marion Kozak Miliband  by virtue of her status as a, by now well-known Holocaust survivor, political activist for radical causes that by simply adding her name and support to them gives it a "Miliband seal of approval" (her sons are complicit in her causes) that could not be understood without knowing more about her. '''7''' The fact that she chooses to remain private and mysterious makes scholars ''more'' curious about her and not less, because there is still a lot more to discover about this woman who with her family, has come into the public eye by taking more mega political power and clout for themselves, and therefore she has risen to fame whether she likes it or nor and whether anyone else likes it or not. In 2012 it's become a provable and verifiable fact
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSOAPBOX||WP:POINT||WP:RS||WP:REF||WP:NOTABLE)