Deletion of Chronology of the Harry Potter series (5th nomination)

Comment: merging serves no purposes other than deletionism. We're |not paper, and this cannot be covered in another article. ''Harry Potter'' is one of the world's best selling series of all time, if not the world's best. A chronology of the events spanning 7-8 books (or whichever) and several spin-offs is neither out of place, nor undesired
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: as a  from Harry_Potter#Plot. Notability of a franchise does not allow the creation of multiple articles about the exact same thing with different presentation... especially when this one is entirely a plot summary, which is #PLOT|what Wikipedia is not supposed to be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:NOT)

Comment: as fancruft and . There are plenty of HP fan sites where it belongs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: The first part of the article is choc-a-block full of |fan interpretation  and |original arguments put forth regarding continuity and canonicity. Wikipedia is ''not'' a producer of new theories. The second part is overly detailed |trivia and |plot summary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:TRIVIA||WP:PLOT)