Deletion of Lapal primary school

Comment: Ofted is trivial. Look at how the triviality condition is used for  to understand what trivial means. It  excludes things which are standard or expected for something in that category. If trivial meant what you thought it meant, almost any corporation would have an article and many humans (including me) would fit  who very obviously don't
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:BIO)

Comment: There are so many problems with the above I don't know where to begin. I see at least three issues. First the matter of a questionable premise - the repeated assertion that all schools are notable even though most people don't think that. Two the irrelevant tautology- obviously everyone agrees that verifiable sourced |notable schools should be kept but to claim that is a policy is simply wrong (in fact, if something were agreed to be notable but not meet  it would be removed.  overides pretty much everything). Third, this once again has the usual buzzwords about organic growth which I have yet to see a defintion. What does this mean? How is organic adding anything to the phrase, and how is this somehow relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:V)