Deletion of Plans for military attacks against Iran

Comment: The lead is basically an essay decrying dangerous Western imperialism, failing NPOV, and much of the rest of the article fails the Crystal Ball test of , #Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball|See point 3. "Articles that present '''extrapolation, speculation, and "future history"''' are original research and therefore inappropriate." (emphasis in original) This is a decent article for a partisan website, but not for an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:OR, , ,  all violated by this huge mess. Other than that, it's well written. If it's not salted, it will most likely return
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SYN||WP:NOT)

Comment: The possibility of an attack against Iran by the US, Israel, or both has been repeatedly discussed in |reliable sources, which have been cited in the article. 2008 Republican presidential candidates and other prominent figures have advocated such an attack. The deletion arguments here mostly amount to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: a clear violation of #CRYSTALBALL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: a vote to keep could be understood as a violation of  - since this article is a prime example of complete fiction written like an encyclopedia article. keeping it in will cause wikipedia will look bad. all those who voted keep please reconsider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:point)