Deletion of List of closed stack libraries

Comment: As far as I can tell, all of the keep !votes above boil down to  and . The list isn't well defined, but definition isn't the only requirement for a list to exist. Stand-alone lists are subject to notability criteria, and my search for other lists of closed stacks libraries (''not'' specific examples) turned up almost nothing but Wikipedia-derived content. There is a better case to be made for the subject article vs. the list (although |a move during AfD is frowned upon because it  it confuses what everybody's talking about), but I would say delete to the subject article as well. This is first because it's just a  (with a list of examples), but more importantly because I don't see sufficient sources to justify a stand-alone article. I wouldn't have any objection to merging selectively to another library-related article, though. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:USEFUL||WP:EDITATAFD||WP:DICDEF)

Comment: We have a list of libraries, which is always going to be larger.  Considerations of space are irrelevant per  and any merger or restructuring of these lists would be best done by ordinary editing rather than deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)