Deletion of James Girvin

Comment: article completely unencyclopedic. In my mind, the jury's out as to whether the subject is any more deserving of a Wikipedia article than any of the 30 other James Girvins that were unearthed by Google search... but even if he were, this article would need to be scraped clean and started anew. Right now I remain unconvinced that a regular column on a college newspaper and a pair of blogs raises him to the bar of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per Hello32020. |Wikipedia is not ego-boo for well-meaning people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTE)