Deletion of Sliding uncus syndrome

Comment: per  plus serious  and  concerns cited above. My knowledge of searching medical references is limited, but it's worth noting that Google Scholar shows exactly one hit for this term, and it's the paper published by the individual who paid for this article to be written //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mr_RD&diff=next&oldid=669087080
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:MEDRS)

Comment: I have already disclosed my  as per wmf:TOU|Wikimedia Terms of Use. I request the page to be judged on its merit. This syndrome is a unique and important one because it undermines the basic concept known to neurology and thus is an important lesson to clinicians at all specialities
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: This page should be judged on its merits, and not the original author's conflict of interest.  That being said, I fully agree with the !votes made by SmartSE and Brianhe; specifically, the fact that the only result on Google Scholar is a paper published by the guy who paid for this article to be written shows that it's a classic case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per .  This new diagnosis is too recently described to be a useful encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)