Deletion of ProjectInsight

Comment: I added another book reference to the article: http://www.ispri.de/download/excerpt.pdf Project Management Software Systems Requirements, Selection Process and Products (excerpt) ISBN 3-937818-13-8 by Dr. Frederik Ahlemann and Kristin Backhaus, which covers ProjectInsight|Project Insight among other Project management software products.  I believe the additional reference enhances the |notability of ProjectInsight|Project Insight within the context of Project management software and Comparison of project management software articles which the ProjectInsight|Project Insight article supports
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Fails . The article contains a claim that a parent company is somewhat notable ("Red Herring North America 100 Finalist") but notability is not inherited and the many references simply confirm that the product exists and is used by at least a handful of minor organizations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Seeing this deletion rationale I expected a glossy sales brochure. Actually seing the 3-lines article is quite disappointing - and I would say that only a desperate and hallucinating salesman would see this as useful advert (=spam). Checked a few of the 15 references, and they sure seem to be a pass for .  Smerdis is off track on this issue, with his home grown and extremely restrictive criteria, not recognizing the notability of niche products. I completely disagree on this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)