Deletion of Masoom Minawala

Comment: Meets . Has coverage in Vogue and also was a TEDx speaker. You don't just get invited to speak at TEDx, unless you are someone significant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Current citations are sufficient to establish . Some people are just famous for being famous. If she's famous for her wedding (for example), then it is what is it, but  in / is established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:IS)

Comment: The subject definitely fails , , . All the mentions are trivial, and just inclusions in the some non-notable under 40 lists does not merit any inherent notability. Also giving TEDx talks has not mean anything for the purposes of notability. {{u|Nalbarian}}, if an when reliable sources with non-trivial coverage comes up in the future, the article can be re-created then. The argument that the article can be expanded in the future is not accepted in AfD discussions here on WP as then every BLP can be argued on that lines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NBUSINESSPERSON||WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets . All references are from reliable sources and mentions were not trivial (For example: TED talk, CNN, HSBC etc.). Yes, article is still at an initial stage and can be expanded in future. There are lots of contents & references on web on the subject of the article. (Note for reviewer: I was the creator of this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per DGG. She is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)