Deletion of Euan Blair (2nd nomination)

Comment: back to his parents.  So far he has achieved nothing notable apart from being his father's son.  This led the press to pick up and report his doings what would be  for any one else, but that does not stop them being NN
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: per nom and per Phil Bridger above. I just removed a paragraph that discusses his appendectomy. Talk about trivia. I also notice repeated BLP violations that are hanging around for ''months'' at a time - almost six in this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Euan_Blair&action=historysubmit&diff=319650512&oldid=294652443 one example. At best it could be merged to Cherie Blair, but right now it's just a classic example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: or '''merge'''. I agree that individuals shouldn't have a page on Wikipedia just because they are related to somebody notable. However, Euan Blair has, rightly or wrongly, attracted a lot of media attention for various reasons, so I'd say he passes the GNG that way. I certainly don't thing  should be interpreted so that all media coverage arising from an individual's association with a notable person should be automatically disregarded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I originally closed this as keep with merging discussion on the talk page. Per a subsequent suggestion, I reverted the close since this is a , after all, and there are some concerns about sourcing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)