Deletion of Casey William Hardison

Comment: From reading the article, I do not think this is "historically notable" per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: non notable person, as per . We do not need an article on every single person that got arrested for a drug-related offense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I believe there's now enough to satisfy  and  concerns (and thus by implication ), but I'm happy to hear more concerns. Given the change in the article since first listing at AfD (and thus since I got going on it), I would also suggest starting the AfD process again to be clear of arguments that (arguably) no longer apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:BLP)

Comment: The article is not a biography. There is little to no early life information or career infomation. Most of the text in the article relates to the illegal activities events, which gives undue weight to the events in the context of the individual. This, in turn, raises  issues. However, I don't think Casey William Hardison is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, so  is not a reason to delete the article. There are enought references cited, so it is clear that the topic meet . That still does not make the article a biography and I am concerned about giving undue weight to the cirminal convictions in the context of his overall life. For those desiring to improve the article, please use Template:Biography to improve the article. Once that is done, please feel free to post on my talk page to revisit my position in this AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:N)

Comment: or '''Move'''.  Explanation: Is the case ''R. v. Casey Hardison'' notable?  If so, then the page should be moved there, and adequately sourced to demonstrate notability.  Casey William Hardison himself is not notable, even if his criminal case is.  Compare: Roy Pearson (not notable, and thus a redirect) and ''Pearson v. Chung'' (notable).  However, ''R. v. Casey Hardison'' is not notable.  The House of Lords refused to consider the appeal.  Perhaps the European Court of Human Rights will issue a landmark ruling striking down every drug law, in which case this case will be notable, but this is also exceedingly unlikely and, in any event, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)