Deletion of Lucky Logan

Comment: Please notice that  applies to articles "where the title is not a plausible Wikipedia:redirect|redirect". We may want to put aside the fact that ''Lucky Logan'' was started by the editor who started ''Logan Lucky'', but we may conversely see it as added proof that ''Lucky Logan'' is a plausible redirect title. A search for '''{{mono|"Lucky Logan" -"Logan Lucky"}}''' reveals that ''Variety'' used the title ''Lucky Logan'' http://variety.com/2016/film/news/steven-soderbergh-channing-tatum-heist-retirement-1201695944/ in February, and that multiple other sources have used it since. Hence, as #Alternatives to deletion|Alternatives to deletion suggests, deletion was not required, as a plausible redirect could have been boldly created per -R, |categorized as a {{tl|R from modification}} and {{tl|R unprintworthy}}. {{pinggroup|Pinging collaorators|NathanielTheBold|Cavarrone|Captain Assassin!|MichaelQSchmidt
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A10||WP:DP||WP:ATD||WP:RCAT)