Deletion of Dan Fornade

Comment: sorry, but if all we have on the guy is a http://www.evenimentul.ro/articol/personalitatile-iasului-vor-avea.html clutch of http://www.business24.ro/carti/scriitori/clujeni-pentru-istorie-799152 puff http://ziuadecj.realitatea.net/eveniment/dictionarul-personalitatilor-epuizat-in-20-de-minute--45698.html pieces in third-tier papers and http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/canada-cel-mai-bun-loc-din-lume-in-care-sa-traiesti-903805.html bare passing mention in a legitimate one, that just doesn't cut it. He does seem to have immersed himself in exile circle dilettantism during his decades abroad, but none of the claims to notability is commented upon by sources on him, as required by . I don't doubt, for instance, that he's "President of Danway Publications", but so what? Has any third-party source ever decided that's something relevant? (And no, a local newspaper brief asking for self-submissions of biographies for Fornade's next "dictionary" doesn't count
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Okay, so the man's notoriety rests on being heavily spam-cited by the lovely Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florentin Smarandache (2nd nomination)|Florentin Smarandache, and on circular references from obscure outlets in the Romanian diaspora. Plus he issues some fanzine abroad, and is not uneducated. That is what the article tells us, that is what all sources tell us until we get tired of trying to find anything relevant (which I did, going through google, google books and scholar). Waiting for hypothetical citations to hypothetical material |just isn't an option
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN)