Deletion of Alan Wilkins (playwright)

Comment: I removed #11, I agree it is not RS.  However the winning of a national critics' award, and reviews of his work in the national press would seem to indicate notability to me. I disagree with the comments above that the article "thoroughly fails" notability. The Times, The Scotsman, The Independent, The Stage, The List, The Guardian are all 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I am not sure why a playwright's notability should be judged by the standards of  or  as suggested by the nominator.  The best fit would surely be reative#Creative_professionals.  Reference #4 gives some background (EFL, Poland, Spain), #5 a little morem (drama teacher, age, school where he was working, description of how the play evolved), #7 a little more (winning an award), #11 & #12, #13 & #15 provide a little more.  His plays have "received multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.", in The Independent, The Scotsman, The Times, The Guardian, The List, and The Herald. I am not sure what else can be added at present, but I suspect that more will be in the next few years
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:GROUP||WP:C)

Comment: obviously, per the cited coverage in reliable sources that shows that the subject passes  with multiple independent periodical articles or reviews of his work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Stubs are fine if the subject of the article is notable but this subject appears to be non-notable.  If anyone has in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources or can otherwise show that the subject meets our notablity requirements,  or  for instance, I can reconsider my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: thoroughly fails |notability checks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:N)