Deletion of Gustavo Stolovitzky

Comment: as the nominator and MewMeowth are both blatantly incorrect in their deletion rationales. Having a fellowship in a selective society is, by itself, a criterion for notability; see #C3. His fellowship in the  American Physical Society and in the American Association for the Advancement of Science both clearly qualify for that criterion, and his IBM Fellowship arguably does as well. (The redlinked fellowships and awards, not so much.) He also has highly-cited publications as listed in a Google scholar search, easily enough for #C1, which the nominator does not even seem to have considered or read. The nomination rationale that his position is not senior is both irrelevant and false — he appears to hold a somewhat high-level position within the type of employement he holds, as a researcher at an industrial lab
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: meets  as a fellow of APS (note to {{u|MewMeowth}}, i am not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment:  C3 per several of the fellowships. I think the New York Academy of Science is also fairly weighty; it also has a small number of honorees for a large membership.   C1 also looks fairly solid, with several highly-cited paper, including some first/last author (in a field where I think that matters).  Comment that  explicitly does not require working at a university, although we do consider title in marginal cases (which this is not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF)

Comment: He passes #C3; yes, Fellowship in the APS is very selective (the number of Fellows is a small percentage of everyone who has worked in physics over the past century, which is a lot of people). Most APS Fellows don't have Wikipedia articles because nobody has taken the time to write them yet, but in principle, all of them ''merit'' articles. Likewise, ''Fellowship'' in the AAAS is much more exclusive than ''membership,'' and Stolovitzky is a Fellow, not just a member. He also passes #C1 with an ISI Web of Science h-index of 48, which is more than high enough to qualify in any field. (Google Scholar, which is more relaxed about what it includes, gives him an h-index of https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=yb-POEcAAAAJ 61, which is in line with how it typically gives somewhat larger figures. It is perhaps a little too relaxed, and ISI a little too strict. Either way, he passes #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: per  as having a fellowship is not (by itself) criteria for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)