Deletion of Olivia Hack

Comment: NACTORS can establish a ''presumption'' of notability. This article lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, without which no topic is notable. That was the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olivia_Hack&diff=453592659&oldid=449912553 PROD reasoning: "''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in |reliable sources to comply with |notability requirements....''" There is nothing "highly inappropriate" about that that I can see
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per meeting  for her voice work being twice nominated for a notable award. That information and citations now added to article. Yes, more to do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: WP:V (policy, not a guideline like ) states, flatly: "''If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)