Deletion of Ahad's Constant

Comment: the article appeared as barely a one line '''stub''' and was nominated for deletion so rapidly without the chance for any editorial expansion, suggests a |conflict of interest amongst Wikipedians to get rid of it pretty pronto. The rule book does state somewhere that new articles should not be nominated for deletion until they are sufficiently fleshed out so as to make their worth more established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: per Zetawoof.  Flunks 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: The concept ''may'' have some notability (although it's difficult to trace, '''not''' having a well-defined name), but Ahad does not, including not being associated with the concept by a |reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Not only does the article as it stands fail to offer any |reliable source citations, http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%22ahad%27s+constant%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Google Scholar has never heard of it. Prominent hits in Google websearch are from blogs and forums, which don't meet RS requirements.  May become notable, but is not currently
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: while Ahad might have some potential in the future, neither this "constant" nor its creator are notable, '''''yet'''''.  So I would delete and salt, but not "indef salt" it.  This idea must be published elsewhere first, then be added to Wikipedia.  I would love to publish some of my own ideas here, but WP is not a publisher of |original research.  Good luck to Ahad and his friends
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: no coverage in third-party reliable sources has been presented, article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: clearly |original research. The multitude of SPA votes should be ingored totally because of the shameless http://www.publishedauthors.org/chatter-box-f3/cast-your-votes-for-ahad-s-constant-t1979.htm canvassing going on (well done THF for finding this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: single line article lacking the multiple RS references required for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)