Deletion of List of youth organizations

Comment: per  as per above. I do agree that the main topic should have an entry and be defined. The list itself is navigational, and does not need sourcing or assertion of notability. As long as they point to an article in en.WP and the article is about the subject (Youth Org), then I have no issues. Any redlinks or no links do not belong (also links to non-youth org entries of course
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: per  pursuant to the |guideline on categories, lists, and navigation templates with emphasis on 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:LISTOUTCOMES||WP:CLN||WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: per  relative to :Category:Youth organizations. Also keep per  as a useful navigational aid, which is evidenced in part by the https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-30&pages=List_of_youth_organizations 6,239 page views it has received in the last thirty days (as of this post). I have also added content and sources in the lead to provide more context
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:LISTPURP)