Deletion of List of interesting or unusual place names (2nd nomination)

Comment: The interest or unusual nature of place names fails Wikipedia:Verifiability; compiling the list itself is |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: if it's put back in articlespace, I will commence to randomly and irrationally remove any city name I don't find interesting or unusual. If I'm reverted, I'll just add a squillion cities that '''I''' find interesting and unusual. Like, say, Richmond, New York City, Albany, Sacramento, Livermore, and a few thousand more. Who is anyone to tell me that Walnut Creek is less "interesting" than Delta? This entire list is completely and utterly subjective and hence unencyclopedic, and if I have to make a  to do it, I'll do it. This list is patently and obviously |original research, which is expressely forbidden by policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:NOR)