Deletion of Jacking

Comment: First of all,  refers to the idea that we will ''not'' run out of webspace. In fact, it specifically says that "there is no practical limit to the number of topics we can cover, or the total amount of content" so on its own that's no reason to delete an article. People donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Wikimedia foundation every time we have a drive, to ensure that we have the hosting capacity we need to keep expanding. Secondly, I don't feel that this falls into "every fad or item conceived", at least any more than other dances mentioned in songs (like the Loco-Motion or Twist (dance)|the twist). Jacking was a pretty common (if stereotypical) dance style in the late 80s. I know Google hits aren't dependable, but with http://www.google.com/search?q=jacking+dance&hl=en&start=0&sa=N almost half a million it seems like there must be at least a couple of reliable sources out there. Looks like there are tons of dance sites out there that discuss the style
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PAPER)

Comment: If the gentle reader will look at the title of WP:PAPER it includes the word "not". I also included "not" in my preamble making this a double negative. Since #INDISCRIMINATE is taking hits on the talkpage, my intent was that even though Wikipedia is believed not to be unlimited in web content or storage, there will come a level when non-notable articles like this will not be included
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)