Deletion of Congregation M'Kor Shalom

Comment: Good work by Epeefleche in finding sources on it and documenting its history. But even without Epeefleche's work, factors that should be considered for a  include "The organization’s longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals". Size of membership and prominent scandals certainly apply here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: because it passes , and for much of the same reasons as I stated that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation (2nd nomination).  Wikipedia:NOTINHERITED#Notability_is_inherited is so complicated, and has common-sense exceptions (for example First Lady).  This is a large congregation (1,000 members today is good), it has been the subject of a major scandal, was noted for several incidents of Anti-semitism, and yes, it had a notable rabbi.  The things that make a church notable probably fly in the face of the reasons that makes a secular place notable or not.   ZAgain, Epeefleche has done another |great job rescuing an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)

Comment: The arguments which have been made to keep this article include, "there are at least 130 Reform Judaism synagogues like this in Category:Reform synagogues in the United States." which amounts to ; "nominating three synagogues in a row for deletion rather than first seeking input from the articles' creators" which is not a reason to keep an article, and in fact once a questionable article has been discovered by an editor it is normal quality control practice to take a look at other articles created by that same editor to see if similar problems exists as noted in this response by an admin to the same claim http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=434555687; "This page is notable because it is home to the infamous Rabbi Neulander (who has a page on here)" which as noted in the original nomination falls under ; and two keep votes which were "per" these arguments.  The only argument so far which seems to be potentially legitimate is Epeefleche's comment that there are numerous ghits.  But having taken a pass through some of the hits I have been unable to find any significant reliable source coverage to establish notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: In its current state, it clearly satisfies . Kudos to Epeefleche. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)