Deletion of Plastic shaman

Comment: No idea how this could be viewed as a dictionary page. It has numerous sources, satisfying both  and . If the nominator has identified POV issues, it would be better to simply tag the article or, better yet, fix them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: per {{u|Uyvsdi}};  does not apply here, and any POV or sourcing issues would be addressed by editing, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICT)

Comment: The article appears well cited with |reliable and |verifiable sources. I'm rather confused about the accusations of "keep" votes here being connected with the internet forum New Age Frauds and Plastic Shamans. The site appears to be a very small part of the article's sourcing and citation. Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)