Deletion of Narayan Prasad Adhikari

Comment: If there's no formal criterion for speedily keeping an article which has a cast-iron reliable source confirming a slam-dunk pass of  then there should be, and until there is we should |act as if there were
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY)

Comment: He does not pass the . As per point 3 of , just being  an elected official for a political office does not mean he/she is notable. And this person has no significant coverage on anything. There are more than 600+ members like him. It does not mean we create wiki pages of everyone. If he was a central member of party along with this post or if he had any major contribution or if he had any significant coverage as I have mentioned, then I would agree  as well. Sorry, those who are favouring for '''Keep''', your arguments are not convincing. The references say nothing about the person. I vote for delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:POLITICIAN)