Deletion of Vanilla DeVille

Comment: Article's subject does not meet ; nominations are not for a "well-known and significant industry award". Even without the notability concerns, once the |self-promotion and obvious |conflicts of interest are removed there's not much left
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:COI)

Comment: currently, the article is so terrible to even be eligible for a speedy deletion under '''wp:G11|G11''' (unambiguous advertising or promotion). The subject appears to pass  per award noms and even for her mainstream works, so an article about her is generally acceptable, but this article is plain and simple a BLP nightmare, written like an advertisement and almost enterely based on self-made claims in unreliable sources (including forum posts, lol!). Eg, the claim that she posed for ''Playboy'' could be a good point for her notability and it is apparently well-sourced, as it is referenced by four sources: well, the sources are 1) her official website 2) an interview for http://www.ambushinterview.com/ this website, that is far from being minimally reliable 3) her blog 4) her official website again (lol!). Other things are simply false: "''In 2011, fans named her one of the top MILF performers in the industry.''": looking at the first source (the second one is her website, as usual) a blog (not a generic "fans") selected her for a poll about milfs. The result of the poll is not even known. So, as per G11, an article about her "need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic". She could be notable, but the article fails two things that are more important, Wikipedia:Neutrality|neutrality and Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Passes . Aside from her scene and website nominations, she has been nominated for AVN's MILF/Cougar Performer of the Year award and XBIZ's Best Actress and MILF Performer of the Year awards. I also think that the XBIZ Web Babe/Starlet of the Year and AVN Web Starlet of the Year awards are performer awards, not website awards like MILF Site of the Year, Best Solo Girl Website, Best Porn Star Website and Performer Site of the Year, which apparently don't count as performer awards so I'm not even going to get into that discussion. The first three awards I mentioned are more than enough to prove she meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. Apparently this article needs to be improved because it "appears to be written like an advertisement" and I think the solution is to improve it, not delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)