Deletion of Son of God vs. Son of Man

Comment: I think if the article were renamed Son of God and Son of Man and the info didn't include Original Research, there seems to be a  basis to keep such a topic. Source material may include: http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Son_of_Man_as_the_Son_of_God.html?id=85D-7JpIyTQC "The 'Son of Man'" as the Son of God, https://library.villanova.edu/Find/Summon/Record?id=FETCH-LOGICAL-p592-d85fd6ed148f82c5c9537b2badeb16fb78591dc1a355f89a76da6dc631286d971 The "One like a Son of Man" Becomes the "Son of God", http://www.readperiodicals.com/201209/2726792551.html The Son of God in the Roman World: Divine Sonship in Its Social and Political Context
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Looking at the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Son_of_God_vs._Son_of_Man&action=history edit history for the page, I'm worried that their may be a |sock puppet problem.  Since the article was created 3 days ago, there have been 8 brand new accounts that have worked on it, and only it. I sent a message to the page creator, assuming good faith, to ask if the user is editing on the different accounts
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)