Deletion of CalWIN (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm not convinced that the computer system used by a welfare agency, no matter how large, is necessarily separately notable. If the litigation becomes notable we could have an article about that, but it would need secondary sources. As is this is pretty much a  situation. Regardless, much of the nomination above does not speak to acceptable deletion rationales
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: The nomination establishes the notability of the subject. There's no evidence that the article can't adhere to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: the nominator doesn't really forward an argument for deletion here - instead, the argument seems to be one for firm editing of the article and a reminder to the folks trying to POV-push from either side of the joys of |neutrality as well as proper use of a talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)