Deletion of Andrew Romanelli (2nd nomination)

Comment: Please also look at Special:Permalink/567502930|this version of the article, before it was eviscerated in 2013 by an |SPA. Though it probably only shows why an |A7 would have been inappropriate rather than giving any reason to keep the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:A7)

Comment: Nothing here (or in the pre-blanking version from 2013 either) constitutes a substantive  pass, and no |reliable source coverage at all has been cited in ''either'' version. And the blanking was actually semi-justified, as well, since the pre-blanking version contained both an |advertorial slant and some unsourced  issues. A writer is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists — reliable source coverage which verifies a proper claim of notability (rather than mere existence) must be present to ''support'' one, but nothing remotely like that has ever been shown in ''any'' version of this article all the way back to its original creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS||WP:NOTADVERT||WP:BLP)