Deletion of Batch Premium Gin

Comment: Per Nha Trang. I also can't find third party, verifiable sources. I agree that the article fails . Lacking a central, editorial board to pass on whether or not articles are to be included in the encyclopedia, we require notability standards, among others, as defined and discussed above. I agree that the solution may be to userfy and hold until the gin becomes notable. It's not there as of now, so it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It's simple, and I'll explain it.  Every article has to pass , which holds that a subject needs to be discussed in "significant detail" in multiple, independent, third-party, reliable sources.  Whether it's "of note" to Winchester, is locally known, has Internet impact or not, none of that matters.  The only thing that does is whether reliable sources -- such as newspapers, books, the BBC and the like -- discuss the subject, and that you can cite those sources.  There's no evidence that this product qualifies. ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)