Deletion of DYIK

Comment: fails , and  is not an SNG which is specifically exempt from needing to meet GNG, so merely meeting it isn't enough to keep the article;  would also apply. I can't find any reliable secondary coverage of this radio station, though it's not impossible that I've missed some in a foreign language - if I have, please ping me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BCAST||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: The station is licensed per http://storage.googleapis.com/request-attachments/krwjuYylHVSLLIneBnTI5jc9Tbe8fFM96hdHaRzlgo7uawnkM2AZ1usAzYkN26EeDvlaV0yL56GpT830ccMGHZyTnhk31ReKna5l/FM%20Listing.pdf last year's NTC listing as it indicates an operator having a station. That said, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST)

Comment: I can find no evidence whatsoever that this topic has the level of coverage required to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  per Astig's and Neutralhomer's argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST)

Comment: per SportingFlyer.  is not a guideline, and I disagree with its premise (the idea that media outlets deserve some sort of exemption from the GNG). Unless and until a community consensus, expressed at an RfC, concludes that NMEDIA is correct, I will simply apply the GNG, which this topic does not pass
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMEDIA)