Deletion of Detroit Tigers minor league players (3rd nomination)

Comment: I was going to say "Delete" because I don't like these minor league articles, but when trying to find something to back up my argument, I came across  so I decided these types of articles should be "Keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC)

Comment: The listed minor league baseball players are those who have been determined to be of some measure of notability under the general notability guidelines per , but WP:BASEBALL and the larger community believe would be better served by inclusion in an "incubator" list article such as this one.  '''''The Wikipedia community, WP:BASEBALL, and/or the participants in this AfD may "conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article," and that the subject matter may be better covered as part of another article''''' per GNG.  This is just such a case, and well supported by the long-standing consensus of WP:BASEBALL, and several years of consistent AfD outcomes: '''KEEP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: on a y nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per  #2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC)

Comment: per Larry and Spanneraol.  This is |POINTy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Alex is being y and I've already ed him. We have a long standing consensus on how to do this that he doesn't seem to comprehend, and now he's wasting our time and resources on this farce. {{ping|X96lee15}}, this meets #2 &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:TROUT||WP:CSC)