Deletion of Judson Laipply

Comment: Now that we have some citations of coverage, I'm thinking this would pass  and . I am still staying '''Neutral''' on this however
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: You took that out of context to fit your arguement. If you read it IN CONTEXT then it says ''Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions. Notability can be determined by: A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following'' . This only applies to movie and TV stars...not internet celebs. Nothing is cited on this page and per  'multiple' sources are needed...not one. So your arguement basically is just ''keep'' with nothing supporting it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: 1.''' As someone who seems to be "up" on Wikipedia rules, you should know better than to make an edit (even a small one) to someone else's comments in a discussion thread. I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate it if I started doing it to your comments. Please don't do it to mine. If you think I took something out of context, then YOU can put it into context entirely in YOUR comment. '''2.''' I agree that I took criteria from "notable actors and television personalities" ''because'' there is no criteria for internet video personalities and yes, I could have made that clearer. '''3.''' The subject still passes the alternative  "Google Test" (gets lots of distinguishable hits on Google or another well known search mechanism) by a country mile - 65,800 hits on Google for "Judson Laipply" and 634,000 for "Evolution of Dance". That alone gets ''my'' '''keep''' vote. '''4.''' I've already agreed that independent citations are needed for a couple statements made on the page. I've fixed some and requested one more. I'm sure it can be found. If not, it only means the deletion of one sentence - not the entire page. In my personal opinion, there is ''no way'' this page should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: with clean-up. His act has been seen by millions of people over the internet, therefore he passes  (''A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following''). The first citation on the page is from the guy's own site and the second is broken (no longer links to the specific newspaper article), so some of the facts on the page need to be cited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)