Deletion of NeuroVista

Comment: The suggestion in the nomination that this is a  article seems misplaced: the article creator has been active on other topics before and since. That aside, however, I agree that the article is not demonstrating notability. It describing a start-up, supported by announcement and listing references, which fall under ''trivial coverage'' at . The article that I linked above shows that the company's history can provide a good case study, but that is a primary source. In itself, this fails  and I think the subsequent sequence of purchases into :LivaNova is too much of a stretch for a merge and redirect to there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (:WP:SPA||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:NCORP)

Comment: The company itself seems to fail , but I could find multiple RS to meet  for the trial run by NeuroVista. I would suggest that this article should support that topic. Sources: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/forecasts-of-epilepsy-seizures-could-become-a-reality/ 1 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41591-020-00028-8 2 https://neurology.ufl.edu/wordpress/files/2020/07/Drew-%E2%80%9CLike-taking-away-a-part-of-myself%E2%80%9D.pdf (pdf) https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/26/do-brain-implants-change-your-identity 3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: Due to a lack of sufficient sources per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)