Deletion of French Structuralist Feminism

Comment: The work of Cixous, Irigaray and Kristeva is an important subsection of structuralist and feminist theory, and forms a coherent body (an article can exist on their collective work without |OR). Needs some cleanup, but no terrible issues with the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: weakly, and without prejudice.  The current article may be borderline |original research; at minimum, it reads that way, and it isn't instantly obvious how the references (added as a string of external links on the bottom of the page) support the assertions in the article.  I must once again insist that words should carry meaning or be edited out.  I'd have a big problem with prose like:''... looks to see if a literary work has successfully used the process of mimesis on the image of the female.  If successful, then a new image of a woman has been created by a woman for a woman.''if it turned up in an article about some claimed business method.  This similarly seems to lack concision and clarity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)