Deletion of Airrosti

Comment: fails  and . Just because the company exists doesn't mean that it's notable. There's coverage in texas publications like https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/airrosti-provides-quick-pain-relief-without-prescription-drugs CBSAustin and https://www.expressnews.com/business/article/Medical-company-expands-moves-into-new-San-13848856.php san antonio press news that doesn't substantiate notability per , neither does a paragraph or maybe two in https://www.dmagazine.com/healthcare-business/2019/05/providers-will-run-amok-dallas-does-too-many-surgeries/ Dallas magazine. I cannot read the https://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/print-edition/2013/10/11/airrosti-finding-its-groove-in-a.html San Antonio Biz Journal, but my guess is that it doesn't substantiate notability outside of the locality, particularly given that bizjournals.com is a domain known because it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_288#Business_Journals_/_bizjournals.com "churns out press releases and propagates native advertising for companies". https://www.activelifedc.com/running/airrosti-rehab-technique-the-secret-for-curing-chronic-running-injuries/113749 Active Life DC doesn't seem to be reliable. The rest of coverage consists of passing mentions like https://rebusinessonline.com/office-developers-are-bullish-on-san-antonios-suburban-markets/ this and https://www.si.com/college/2017/02/07/marcus-keene-central-michigan-chippewas-division-i-scoring-leader this. The BBB profile accredits around 400,000 ''local'' businesses, meaning that it doesn't establish notability also. It's unreasonable to think a redirect to a target that doesn't even mention the company would help whatsoever. To meet NCORP I'd expect multiple non-local publications covering it that are unambiguously ''not'' promoting the product. The San Antonio Press News is perhaps the best coverage, but it really isn't enough by itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG||WP:AUD)

Comment: Good analysis by Eddie891 and I would add that none of the references contain "Independent Content" including the bizjournals reference which relies entirely on an interview with company executives. References fail  as they have no "Independent Content". I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: it does not appear to be written as an advertisement, and even if it was that would require cleanup not AfD. With regards to notability, the article is not well sourced but there are plenty of news stories which probably pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: WP:RS|sourcing is weak, local, |in passing, and/or |referenced to clients
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTINHERITED)