Deletion of The Silk Road (anonymous marketplace)

Comment: to Bitcoin) a premature creation on the basis of three sources (one of which isn't particularly reliable) published within the last day or two -- no evidence of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: Whether it's real or not, Schumer thinks it's real, so it deserves a Wikipedia article per . I suspect more coverage is likely in the future, just because of that. Also, The Sydney Morning Herald http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/drugs-bought-with-virtual-cash-20110611-1fy0a.html is not a blog
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The "hoax" possibility mentioned is something of a red herring – even if that were true, that a topic might be a hoax is :Category:Hoaxes|by no means an obstacle to our having an article on it. On the face of it, this nomination seems underresearched if only two references |could be found and |"just isn't notable" is the rationale for deletion. A quick Google search brought up many more, which I've added to the article along with a {{tl|rescue}} tag so that editors can assess the coverage and perhaps develop a viable article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:JNN)