Deletion of Nick Gross

Comment: actually, there clearly isn't enough coverage, at least independent coverage. The first two articles are written by Gross himself, and the Gawker article is merely reporting on a Bloomberg article (archived http://web.archive.org/web/20140802004746/https://www.bloomberg.com/video/bill-gross-son-picks-beats-over-bonds-cgjy4j83QI6c6DVcn7sAcA.html here) which is just an interview with Gross plugging his STRZ Enterprises company, so all of these can be discounted as primary sources, as well as the links to STRZ Enterprises and FYG Foundation websites. The Businesswire and Venturebeat articles are press releases that only mention Gross in passing as an investor in a start-up, which doesn't demonstrate notability. The ''Billboard'' article is reliable and independent, but it doesn't show that Gross is individually notable, only that his band might be. Everything else is local coverage and/or inherited notability of his famous father or two non-notable bands that Gross has been in. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: not notable as either musician, entrepreneur, or philanthropist. Coverage is hyper-local, , or routine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)