Deletion of MD4Bush Incident

Comment: Notability isn't temporary and .  there are multiple sources covering the controversy including a news magazine of national scope (though I personally don't like it, that isn't important).  Also, the article could use serious help in cleaning up POV or apparent POV issues and in giving a better run-down of the incident and connections to other like incidents.  There is a good deal of general scholarly research on the changing boundaries of privacy and how public officials are reacting to that--this is one example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)

Comment: for lack of lasting impact. May I refer the "notable from the news coverage" voters to , which states: "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability"? The short burst is over two years old, and nothing more has been heard of it since
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)