Deletion of Mortimer Goth

Comment: Fails the |general notability guidelines because there is no significant coverage of this subject in reliable sources independent of the game. http://archive.salon.com/tech/review/2000/02/17/sims/print.html The only source that was found only mentions the character by name, and does not offer any factual or critical information to write a  article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VERIFIABLE)

Comment: per J. Milburn and Stormie, and yes LGRdC I'm aware of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PERNOM)

Comment: The article doesn't cite reliable, independent sources which would grant it notability under the .  We haven't enacted  as a daughter guideline, so we can't claim any inherited notability from the larger work of fiction.  The sources listed in this AfD but not added to the article either seem to be tangential (reviews or one-liners) or not independent.  I don't see a problem with a redirect and nothing should stop us from transwikiing the article, but both of those are editorial considerations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FICT)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)