Deletion of CryptGenRandom

Comment: This would appear to be a content dispute.  There is enough referenced material in the nominated article to be worth saving somewhere.  I'm not sure the nominator disagrees.  I also think that Windows cryptography functions and random number generators, and their software components, are probably going to easily meet the |general notability guideline.  How the material should be arranged and presented is a matter I'd leave to those who know more about the subject than I do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)