Deletion of Andersen Corporation

Comment: The Gale source cited above looks fine and it's easy to find more such as the ''Encyclopedia of Consumer Brands''.  All that's needed is improvement per  while  makes it clear that articles are welcome in mainspace even if they are not perfect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: extremely well known company that makes windows, with |plenty of coverage, but they were ripped off if they paid for this junk. It's borderline 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:TNT)

Comment: If we're seriously debating the notability of a manufacturing company with 100+ years trading history, $2.5B revenues and 12,000 staff, that's as good an illustration of the abusability of  as you're ever going to find! By all means let's improve the article, it could do with some of that, but let's not throw the baby out with the bath water
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clear  case; one of the largest window manufacturers in North America, and 'going public' on a stock market is not a standard for any article here, nor should it be (and I'd assume after '''117 years''' as a private concern, that isn't going to happen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: Their products are used in a good number of North American home and small businesses (my home has multiple windows from this company, for instance). They have multiple franchised installers who advertise every single day on American and Canadian television and in daily newspapers. The company more than meets GNG. Remove the  tone, and we have an easy keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: Dear {{u|Eóin}} and others: A) I think that the aforementioned Star Tribune sources don't meet , and may not meet  either, and therefore Andersen is non-notable. B) Even if Andersen were notable, I think that, per , it would be best to delete or stubify or draftify the article and then possibly start over. ❧ What are your thoughts on both points
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:AUD||WP:NOTFORPROMOTION)