Deletion of ArtDaily

Comment: I did multiple Google searches, and there's no coverage that would indicate this site is in any way notable.  Fails . And the reason is quite clear - it is a site built solely on copying and pasting selected press releases from news services.  If you subscribed to Business Wire or Marketwired and set up filters for art-related keywords, you'd be able to replicate this site. It's not rocket science. I looked at the first few articles that link to this site and the incoming links are there because editors used this site as an unreliable source.  Deleting this and causing redlinks would actually have the added benefit of alerting others to find alternate sources in all those other articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: for the benefit of readers. I know this is an unconventional keep reason but I do feel strongly about it and need to hear a practical (as opposed to policy) reason why this should be deleted. There are at least 100 articles on wikipedia that use this site as a source. Readers need to know that it is mostly based on press releases with minimal editorial control. I don't oppose replacing the content with something more  but we don't need to create the disruption of deleting first to do that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: at the very least it needs . Over 100 WP in-links though, normally through citing articles it has written. Could not easily find valid sources which discuss it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)