Deletion of MADNESS

Comment: While there are some mentions of MADNESS floating around out there, everything I've been able to dig up so far fails .  The "papers on MADNESS" that Jeff.science presents are not, in fact, papers on MADNESS.  What he is showing is a list of papers that are used as references in a single paper on MADNESS - http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/78/1/012018/ this paper here.  Although this paper seems to be legit, a single paper on a given topic does not merit inclusion in an encyclopedia.  Most of the other links that Jeff.science presents are PowerPoint presentations.  I don't know who they are presented to, and who they are presented by, but they do not seem to meet .  It also doesn't help that the article as it is currently written contains no sources!  If anybody is able to present multiple reliable sources with significant coverage of MADNESS, then I would most certainly change my !vote.  I too am interested to see which sources Lukeno94 is referring to, as he seems to be an experienced editor with a good amount of AfD involvment.  I've looked through them all and don't see enough there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: per , . The 2011 R&D 100 Winner does it for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG)