Deletion of Slugslinger (2nd nomination)

Comment: discounting a single passing mention, the subject of this article is covered only by the same kinds of sources that have generally been shown to be insufficient- toy catalogues, price guides and the works of fiction themselves. I'm still not seeing the substantial, independent sources that Wikipedia requires for an independent article. This is clear from the |lardy structure of the article itself: plotsummaryplotsummaryplotsummaryplotsummary This character appeared in primary source X1. This character appeared in primary source Y2 plotsummaryplotsummaryplotsummaryplotsummaryplotsummary. I'm also not convinced of the merits of a merge because the suggested merge targets would not be improved by including material from this article: they are already way too long, have many of the same kinds of sourcing issues this one does, and are also too heavy on plot summary. Copy and pasting more of the same would make those articles worse rather than better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:LARD)