Deletion of GEC-Marconi scientist deaths conspiracy theory

Comment: The claims of nonexistence of sources are unfounded. An AP story runs under different headlines in different newspapers, so one from 1987 may be hard to track down. A Keep !vote does not mean that I think SMERSH was assassinating the scientists, just that there was much discussion in the mainstream press of the unusual cluster of mysterious deaths. A Google News Archive search for the name "Vimal Dajibhai" produced 8 articles from 1987-88 http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Vimal+Dajibhai&btnG=Search+Archives&num=10&lr=&as_user_ldate=1987&as_user_hdate=2008 (pay per view) which call the deaths of multiple defense scientists a "mystery" or which say Britons "demand a probe" of multiple deaths linked to the "secret defense research." These are in U.S. papers, showing the longstanding international interest in the multiple deaths. The name  "Avtar Singh Gida" http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Avtar+Singh+Gida%22&btnG=Search+Archives&num=10&as_user_ldate=1986&as_user_hdate=1989 shows up in four of these same articles. "John Brittan" and Russell Smith" show up in "A BODY ADDS TO A BRITISH MYSTERY" in a U.S. paper in 1988 http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=PI&s_site=philly&p_multi=PI&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB29E1069311003&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM. "Peter Peapell" shows up http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Peter+Peapell%22&btnG=Search+Archives&num=10&as_user_ldate=1986&as_user_hdate=2008 in U.S. papers in 1987-88 in "A FIFTH DEFENSE SCIENTIST DIES MYSTERIOUSLY IN BRITAIN," "A BRITISH MYSTERY: 4 DEFENSE SCIENTISTS DEAD AND 1 MISSING," and "INQUIRY SOUGHT AFTER EIGHTH BRITISH SCIENTIST IS FOUND DEAD, "  an AP story March 27, 1988, printed in the Dallas Morning News, which said a UK lawmaker called for an inquiry after Terry Knight was found dead in a car from exhaust fumes, and that he was the 8th British scientist involved in defense work who died under mysterious circumstances since Augusr 1986, and that 5 of them worked for Marconi http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DM&p_theme=dm&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0ED3CFE4A7CF6D25&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM. These all go beyond reporting a suspicious death to discussing a "mystery" and link a number of deaths together. The article needds some research in a library to track down non-online and non-free sources, but there was clearly worldwide interest in a cluster of deaths not from natural causes of a number of British defence scientists in the 1980s. This shows the topic is not |just original research or |synthesis on the part of article creators, and shows that the suspected linkage of a number of deaths had |notability. A task for editors is to pare away the inevitable add-ons of later deaths which were not linked to the 1986-88 cluster by |reliable sources such as the newspapers I cited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:N||WP:RS)