Deletion of Intelligent design (historical)

Comment: as original research and original synthesis of 19th century primary sources. Also note that this content is not suitable for merging, wikipedia is not a dictionary and content is not necessarily relevant to the topic at hand just because it uses the two words "Intelligent design" . We only link content when the reliable sources provide that linkage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICDEF)

Comment: or redirect). There are 2 articles already for this subject: teleological argument and intelligent design. Discussion about that (in my opinion) POV forking is taking place mainly for now on the intelligent design talkpage, but in any case certainly does not show room for a ''third'' article. The focus upon the 19th century seems very much based on original research and is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)