Deletion of Andrew Osta

Comment: Atención San Miguel'' counts for something. Although  and  make pertinent general observations such as "the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication," neither explicitly disqualifies newspaper sources based on "localness", frequency of publication, circulation, paid staff, or whether they have a published editorial policy. For me the problem is that ''Atención San Miguel'' is the ''only'' arms length reliable source. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, newspapers.com, newspaperarchive.com, and EBSCO turned up only http://www.kansascity.com/living/home-garden/home-q-a/article3420431.html this mention in the ''Kansas City Star'', where a collector describes Osta as an "up-and-coming artist". People and things that are up-and-coming have, almost by definition, rarely received the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources necessary to be included in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)