Deletion of Invest.com

Comment: Firstly some of the sources have been misrepresented. There is a difference between the domain ''Invest.com'' and the ''company which currently has control of Invest.com''. Sources for one cannot be used for another and this article is about the latter. Secondly, per , many of the sources are questionable. http://www.geektime.com/2016/05/26/moshe-hogegs-online-investment-platform-invest-com-raises-20-million/ Geektime is essentially a blog which contains user submitted content. http://directory.financemagnates.com/ Finance Magnates is similar, anyone can register and submit content and there seems to be a feature to submit news about one's company. The Daily Telegraph references is more about the domain name. References 1 and 2 are essentially routine coverage - the kind where companies send press releases to the newspaper's financial section and it is redressed and reprinted. These cannot be used for  and . In today's world, publishing news about a startup's investment/funding is no big deal. Almost every startup can "create" such news and if we go by such a literal interpretation of GNG, wikipedia will become a directory of companies. But that precisely goes against . To prevent this, we try to find out whether the the company is featured prominently in mainstream media (and not techblogs). Most notable companies will usually be profiled in mainstream media and these article will not be "5 line mentions in a redressed press release". This particular entity is nowhere close to being notable at this point and I advocate a delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: It's not the puff piece it was, and you've done good work here, but still doesn't have the , sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Wow, this is a mess. I think a little  would do the article well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)