Deletion of List of notable addresses

Comment: apparently everything necessary for inclusion is a redirect (which, in the case of the White House, even was a double redirect). Now redirects are cheap, and in theory I could find out the addresses for more-or-less famous buildings - say, the Élysée Palace, whose address is conveniently mentioned in the article's first line - create the redirects and include them? The fictional addresses are even worse, with only the 221B Baker Street article even discussing the address itself. Per , this one fails all three purposes of lists, and the Wikipedia self-referential inclusion criterion is useless. That it's unsourced doesn't help
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: While such a list potentially could be a viable topic for Wikipedia, the failure to provide any |verification to the article since the first AfD on 3 November 2006 makes it unlikely that this article will ever meet Wikipedia's article standards policies. Also, per Wikipedia:Lists#Criteria_for_inclusion_in_lists|criteria for inclusion in lists, lists should always include unambiguous statements of membership criteria based on definitions made by reputable sources. Eight months have passed since AfD#1 and such a membership criteria has not been formulated, making it unlikely that it ever will
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: this is verythe definition of an |"indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per |original research involved in determining if an address is notable.  I don't think an encyclopedia should be setting the bar for which address are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: this is an #LINK|internal linkfarm. Also, contrary to the stated premise of the list, the article is not capturing articles on fictional addresses. Surfside 6 is about the show, not the address. 77 Sunset Strip is about the show, not the address
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  and the above.  The fact that none of the articles linked to are about the ''address'' but rather what is at the address is key - it's not the address that is notable, but the building that resides there.  That someone decided these particular buildings have memorable and easily recognizable addresses is both subjective as well as being loosely associated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)