Deletion of David michael close

Comment: Seems to fail . Performing budgeting and radar timing might or might not be significant work, but it doesn't seem like his contributions have been written about in a significant way. A "commendation" in and of itself is not rare, as the article claims (there are awards with the word "commendation" in them, but most are not UK, and the UK ones are accessory to another award, it seems). Unless some good refs are found, it just seems like he's not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE)

Comment: It was originally speedied db-spam (for some reason) and then db-bio, but I had removed the eacock prose before the speedy tag reappeared. If references can be found then the subject does appear to be notable for his improvements to military technology. If none can be found, then the article will need to be deleted. I doubt we'll get any help from the article's creator, however, since the first communication on his talk page was a db-spam warning, without even a welcome tag or even a "hello
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Does not meet basic notability requirements, see  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:VRS||WP:GNG)