Deletion of Ellen Hambro

Comment: a previous PROD rationale claimed "appointments of this civil servant mentioned in official Norwegian sources, but no secondary sources and insufficient notability", but this is wrong, wrong and wrong. 1) The sources are not official by any means, they are independent/|RS. 2) Two secondary sources already in the article, one of which is a paper encyclopedia. 3) This adds up to sufficient notability. Notability should be intuitive anyway. 4) By the way the article was prodded by a new user and afd'd by an anon - who in the world has a grudge against Ellen Hambro
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: this stub easily meets the minimal requirements for |notability via |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Being head of a national government agency is enough to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: the notability bar is set pretty low as wikipedia is |not paper.  The very fact that a paper encyclopedia deems the person is notable enough for an entry means that there is enough notability for a wikipedia entry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)