Deletion of DWWR 15

Comment: Concern about application of  (C) particular C.2.  Obviously  A7 not applicable here as a product though that to a degree is a loophole
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:CSD)

Comment: Per  and .  These were large material historical objects.  Old things are always thinner on WP:GNG.  Yes, they were niche, but WP was built to handle this.  There is no PROMO-COI-UDP-POV here that would damage WP; and the articles are well constructed.  No harm in chronicling them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: all of them, as quickly as possible, obviously.  is required by certain editors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:GOODFAITH)

Comment: Now I am seeing bias against offline books..... and more  failure.  But at least everything is here together.  For hamburger I need to think.  carefully.  thankyou
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)