Deletion of Sarina Singh

Comment: per nom and RHaworth. I disagree that the one hour documentary is sufficient basis for a claim of notability. I don't find notability here to be at all compelling and certainly not on the basis of the documentary. IMDB and the Australian FFC and National Library links posted above are just database entries which only prove the documentary exists but they don't prove notability. Even if the documentary is notable, it seems that would justify an article about the documentary, not necessarily the writer. I've spent quite a lot of time on Factiva and the Australian New Zealand Reference Centre today but I really can't find much that would qualify as non-trivial or anything that would be useful in sourcing the article. Most of the articles that come up are articles that describe locations she has written about in the Lonely Planet books and are merely mentions in passing. There's a small number of articles she has written for newspapers but again, she's not the subject of the articles and merely has a byline. There's also a not insignificant number of articles about someone of the same name from Ireland and a couple of very short articles saying she was acting as agent for the sale of her parents multi-million dollar property in Hawthorn, Victoria, which also doesn't support notability. I'm also concerned about the quality of the sourcing in the article and I really don't think it's heading in the direction of complying with ,  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Appears to fail  and is clearly at some level self-promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)