Deletion of Florat

Comment: some of the sources above look a bit like the sort of tabloid junk you get in ''Daily Mail'' or similar. That being said, the coverage across various different national newspapers is just about enough to satisfy , imo
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject of the article has been covered non-trivially by multiple sources, including ''Bota Sot'' (https://www.botasot.info/mediale-vip-showbiz/1513686/florat-qerimi-talenti-i-repit-shqitaro-zviceran/, https://www.botasot.info/mediale-vip-showbiz/1495010/neser-me-28-janar-vjen-super-projekti-nga-labeli-mrm/), ''Epoka e Re'' (https://www.epokaere.com/florat-cerimi-vjen-me-tri-projekte-muzikore-unike/), ''Intervista'' (https://intervista.al/web/2021/01/djemte-e-mrm-orges-ft-florat-elbu-sjellin-sh-w-a/, https://intervista.al/web/2021/02/florat-qerimi-talenti-i-repit-shqiptaro-zvicerin/), and ''Gazeta Direkt'' (http://www.gazetadirekt.com/estrada/florat-qerimi-talenti-i-repit-shqiptaro-zviceran/) among others, meeting the first criterion of  and general criteria in . I'm not sure how this constitutes "multiple issues" or "lack of references", as the deletion nominator put it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: as has enough reliable sources coverage to pass  in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)