Deletion of Pilots for 9/11 Truth

Comment: Only sources seem to be from self-published sources, violating . "You're all sheep" not a valid argument for keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per nom.  Gets exactly "1" hit in Google News Search for the Free Market News Network in Florida, which means it fails our  tests.  I have to thank Ombudsman for creating this one though, so that we could delete it -- I was beginning to lose interest in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: per nom. Regardless of what they stand for, or their methods, this is a non-notable group with no verifiable information in the article. Fails  in addition to the rest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Ah yes, some people will believe anything put before them in writing. The Great Moon Hoax is a prime example of this. However, this subject fails  by several criteria, one of which that it doesn’t even attract enough audience to where it constitutes having an article here. Therefore, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)