Deletion of School prank (3rd nomination)

Comment: I voted keep last time because the alternative, as we see from abysmal unverifiable dross like Cleveland Steamer, is a whole series of small abysmal unverifiable articles rather than one which might stand some chance of being verified in parts.  However, this article is a maintenance nightmare and an absolute magnet for |things made up in school one day
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: though the article needs a massive edit.  I've tagged it for sourcing.  Any entries that do not get sourced should be deleted per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: No source citations. Nothing here meets the |verifiability policy, it's all personal testimony and |original research. However, I disagree strongly with the nominator's second comment; whether or not an article encourages pranks is irrelevant. This is not a factor in deciding whether we should have articles on MIT hacks, masturbation, or genocide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR)