Deletion of Motionless electromagnetic generator

Comment: Article now has more primary sourced SYNTHESIS and OR than ever. Lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources make it clear the promised edits to bring the article into compliance with these policies are not possible. Keep and edit to bring this article into compliance with , , and  policy: include only material that objective reliable secondary sources find notable. Much of this content was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Bearden for lack of notability. Redirect to History_of_perpetual_motion_machines#2000s
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:PSTS)

Comment: per //. '''Do not redirect''' per FrankRadioSpecial ''infra
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:NOR||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: Article's subject does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Paucity of reliable secondary sources providing in-depth coverage indicates  is not met; the rest leads me to think  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: However, article needs to be rewritten to make it clearer that this is  and pseudoscience
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)