Deletion of NewPark Mall

Comment: Sounds like every other mall. Verifiable? Yes, but I wouldn't call it notable. However, this mall is probably better known then some of the bands we include. The thing is, it's just a mall. I can't really see people looking for this information. There's nothing to say about it (besides what belongs in a directory). Personally, I think we rely on  too much for grounds for deletion. Notability is becoming less an issue as the internet grows, as more data is retained, as more is written, documented, recorded, whatever... the easier it will be to provide sources (or "notes" as in notability). I think in cases like this, instead of , it really comes down to OT#INFO, or better yet, common sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: per . It's a mall. Just a normal mall
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Notability is derived from Economic Impact to the local community. And I do agree with User:Rocket000, it seems as though there is some ointy nominations going on with all the Shopping Centres lately. My argument is the same in ALL these cases. A shopping Centre provides a staggering economic impact in initial construction, overall ownership, store ownerships, employment(onsite and offsite), "state" taxes, hydro, the list is long. The impact is long term, during contruction, lifecycle, demise, and historicly. WP:Corp allows for an organizations Economic Impact to be the cause of notability. How do Shopping Centres not qualify under this guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)