Deletion of Henry d'Agier

Comment: How exactly does the article fail ? A reference need not be primarily about a topic to be a valid one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Agree with all of the above. If he was "a notable figure in his area" there should be sources to support that, and one would have to be quite notable in a small local area to pass  and . I think the smaller the area, the harder it should be to pass
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: there seems to very few articles on small-town mayors (even modern ones) even though I would think that they ususally qualify under , and there are obvious difficulties with providing as many detailed sources on this one, since it is from some time ago
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I am puzzled as to why this has been relisted a second time. Most of the "keep" arguments are completely spurious, or completely unrelated to Wikipedia policy, or both. For example "according to , "Mayors" without distinction in size of the town are considered to meet the criterion" is simply not true, as can be verified by reading . Then we have "being mayor he was sworn in by the prefect of Calvados and receiving the honour of working for the people", which does not relate in the least to Wikipedia's notability criteria. More than once we have words to the effect "I expect more sources exist, but I am not in a position to find them". Unfortunately the onus is on those who want a "keep" to establish that adequate sources exist: guessing that they probably do is not sufficient. Also even if, as suggested, further information exists in Caen's departmental archives, this is not '''independent''' coverage: of course all local governments have records of people who have worked for them, notable or not. At present only one source is cited, and while I do not have access to this source, Ravenswing has, and tells us the source "has a few sentences about d'Agier's existence and the photostat of a document he signed". In short, there is no evidence at all that d'Agier comes anywhere near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails to satisfy , even if outdated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I mostly agree with the nominator and Andrew Lenahan. No new sources have been presented during this AfD, and the subject doesn't qualify for a separate article by either  or , even though judging him just by the latter may be a little unfair given that a lot less press existed back then. He may have a certain claim to be a "part of the enduring historical record", but there's just not enough coverage of him to justify a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Fails to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (people), and in particular . There is certainly no inherent notability for mayors of small towns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)