Deletion of Bernard Edlington (2nd nomination)

Comment: Actually I thought published articles carry more weight than online ones, no? Some admins opinions regarding notability seem to have a very western bias , even systemic bias maybe you should ask someone from Japan, or some proof if you dispute the sources. Yes a credit is just a credit, but with backed up articles that is a different thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTKNOWIT)

Comment: no real case for notability here - I fail to see why he's more notable than the hundreds of other visual effects people out there.  For all we know, his work on the productions listed could have involved making coffee for the rest of the production crew.  Would not appear to meet the  notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: This is short of the level of notability expected by . For instance, it is expected that ''The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors.'' Though the article has references, it is not clear if there are any independent third parties expressing their approval of his work. So we don't perceive that his work is widely cited or commented on. Japanese language sources could be summarized in English (on the article Talk page) if there is a chance we are missing something important
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)