Deletion of Michael Moates (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article is ''not'' showing that Moates has been the ''subject'' of enough |reliable source coverage to pass  — this is based entirely on |primary source (e.g. his own contributor profiles on websites he's directly affiliated with), YouTube clips, glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of someone or something other than him, and sources which are entirely tangential to him because they entirely fail to even mention his name at all. This is ''not'' how you demonstrate a person as notable enough for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: As per all the above delete votes.  In addition, it doesn't meet , the article claims he's a candidate for Congress but I see no sign that he is running a bona fide campaign (and he's not age-eligible in 2018
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Doesn't meet  because he has not received in-depth coverage in |reliable sources (somebody's blog or Facebook is not a reliable source; tabloid newspapers or online publications with similar standards of fact checking are not reliable sources). Being a journalist doesn't guarantee notability - this is proven by many precedents and implied by . The article has lots of references but most are one-line mentions at best. What the references prove is that he's less famous than some woman who pissed on a flag, and she's not notable either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:RS||WP:JOURNALIST)