Deletion of Bug Fables: The Everlasting Sapling

Comment: per above, article now seems to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The main problem about this one is that the coverage it gets from reliable sources is purely  and expected for any video game announced: "to launch", "announced", "set to release", "out today", "comes to a certain platform" and other things, with basic info about the game slightly altered from press releases. That being said, I found a very good source detailing the game's development at Red Bull https://www.redbull.com/int-en/bug-fables-nintendo-switch-interview, but that is it sadly. The Gamer seems to be situational leaning to unreliable source per the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#THEGAMER, questionably/likely unreliable like Go Nintendo and Nintendo Insider mentioned here and everything else is in lines of the RPS/Destructoid/NLife/GRadar routine sources posted above (also RPGSite, 4Gamer or Video Games Chronicle). That led me to conclusion that this game fails . It may be notable after the consoles release at the end of this month, but not now and at this point of time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG)

Comment: Striking my vote due to the newfound reference at RPGSite (which appeared after the AfD has started!). That, the Vandal source and Red Bull article should make it for a  pass now. Plus, I am positive it will be reviewed by Nintendo Life and/or Nintendo World Report when the game releases on Switch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)