Deletion of List of idioms in the English language (A)

Comment: per nom; in particular, these are unsourced and constitute |original research. Some are matter of opinion. Many of the terms on the list are ''not'' idioms at all. Not all maxims, axioms, literary allusions and metaphors are "idioms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per |Wikipedia is not a dictionary + original research. This is almost as bad as List_of_two-letter_English_words. Wikipedia is not a place for Scrabble/crossword-cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: obviously violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD)

Comment: being useful isn't an argument for keeping the article, see . I thought I'd mention this, since I counted 7 !votes that attempt to argue this. Once they are taken out of the equation it becomes more obvious that this list, and the 25 others that will soon appear on AFD, should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)