Deletion of Sayward Forest Canoe Route (2nd nomination)

Comment: I don't think the spirit of  must necessarily apply to this article; the policy seems focused mainly on the exclusion of minutiae useful only to travelers from articles about places. If this article contained a step-by-step guide to completing the route with minor details about resting places and such, then I think ''that content'' would fall afoul of the policy, but the article's existence in itself doesn't necessarily make it a guide. Meanwhile, there appears to be significant independent coverage of this route in reliable sources. See http://www.amazon.com/Sayward-Forest-Circuit-Michel-Gauthier/dp/0986509507 this book and http://www.coastandkayak.com/2008/Summer%202008/summer08artoftheportage.html this magazine story. While a lot of the material about it is guidebook-type stuff, there's enough to show that it's a popular route that's received some coverage, and there's enough to write an article with. It meets . The  argument is also a fair one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:GNG||WP:SK1)