Deletion of Quackademic medicine

Comment: I get the feeling that most () are agreed that a separate article isn't warranted simply because of lack of notability and neologism concerns. There is also some recognition that ''brief'' mention in the quackery article would be acceptable. I agree with both POV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)