Deletion of Sheye Banks

Comment: Almost as if the one who proposed this article be deleted didn't as per   do a good research before taking this action, he has once been cautioned about this  (when he nominated a standard article of mine for deletion, This article was eventually "saved" From my own research, his Name (Sheye Banks) is mentioned & even attached with peacock titles but the problem is the reliability of those sources mentioning his name. I think he possesses some influence over articles written about him
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: my !vote earlier was a move to draft, but from closer look and observation I say the page be '''deleted''' and recreated at a later time when subject of the article may have gathered more coverage. Please let us learn to avoid being  as per our choice of words towards other editors and the subject of their articles. let us work with decorum. Furthermore let certain editors study closely  and  hence they risk damaging a potentially good article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:UNCIVIL||WP:NOTHERE||WP:PEACOCK)

Comment: I do not see the subject getting notable in the nearest future, so no point moving to draft. I noticed same editor who created Chris Rio, made this one too. |Promotional purpose only
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)