Deletion of NewtonX, Inc.

Comment: The criteria for notability for companies/organization is fully documented in  and requires references to have in-depth "Independent Content" on the company. "Independent Content" is defined in . {{u|Desmay}}, none of those references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The TechCrunch reference is based on an interview with Chastel and there is nothing in the article that is "clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated with the company". The INC article is a mention-in-passing (describing Sascha as the COO/founder of NetwonX, nothing more) and fails . The Venturebeat article is based on a company announcements and fails . The Forbes article is also a mention in passing (again, describing Sascha Eder, nothing more
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: An article about about a classic startup that fails  that was specifically meant to address these types of articles. Also asserts  and  as the majority of the references are driven by press releases. 8 of the 15 state ''twelve million dollars in Series A funding''. Of the remaining seven, one is non-rs, another one is initial funding, leaving two. One of remaining, the ''Inc'' article is a name drop for the company, the remaining is a magazine that markets startups and other general run of the mill business news. Very very poor sourcing. There is no secondary sources whatsoever, they are all primary, run of the mill business news
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The article passes ; a simple Google search alone provides 227,000 results for NewtonX. https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=2LJmXey_Fsz4tAWPnaiQCw&q=NewtonX&oq=NewtonX&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.134.1214..1460...0.0..0.174.722.5j2......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131.V1P9fmT3b50&ved=0ahUKEwjsi9jzhKbkAhVMPK0KHY8OCrIQ4dUDCAc&uact=5 There are plenty more sources about this company available than what are currently present in the article.--{{nowrap
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The NewtonX, Inc. article's citations include Tech Crunch https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/18/two-sigma-leads-12m-series-a-for-expert-knowledge-network-newtonx/, VentureBeat https://venturebeat.com/2019/06/18/newtonx-raises-12-million-to-help-companies-find-expert-consultants/, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2018/06/26/entrepreneurial-networking-10-approaches-you-can-use/#6574978ce428, and Inc. (magazine)|Inc. https://www.inc.com/dana-sitar/expect-rapid-growth-in-2019-take-these-7-steps-now-to-keep-your-employees-sane.html--all of which are authoritative publications with respect to the field of business. The fact that these reliable sources discuss NewtonX, Inc. attest to its notability (passes ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Entirely promotional and not a single reference (including the ones mentioned above) meet the criteria for establishing notability, nor am I able to locate a single reference that meets the criteria. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: This article passes  and . While it's obviously a smaller company relatively, enough sources have been written about it to keep the article (these, for example, in addition to the ones mentioned above: https://www.builtinnyc.com/2019/06/18/newtonx-series-funding 1,http://www.theexpertnetworks.com/newtonx-expert-network/4593853533 2,https://www.b2bnn.com/2018/12/newtonx-b2b-influencers-expert-networks/ 3,http://seriesa.blubrry.net/2018/02/01/series-a-5-germain-chastel-ceo-co-founder-newton-x/ 4,https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/5-world-class-consulting-for-all-germain-chastel-newtonx/id1331591447?i=1000401248848 5,https://www.alleywatch.com/2018/12/this-nyc-startups-ai-powered-search-engine-connects-you-to-domain-experts/ 6,http://www.integrity-research.com/ai-driven-expert-network-disrupt-industry/ 7,https://www.thetrustedinsight.com/investment-news/newtonx-the-first-ai-powered-expert-search-engine-closes-12m-series-a-led-by-two-sigma-ventures-20190618557/ 8,https://pulse2.com/newtonx-raises-12-million/ 9,https://www.intelligentcio.com/eu/2019/02/26/using-supervised-machine-learning-to-reach-a-desired-solution/ 10,https://medium.com/authority-magazine/to-create-a-fantastic-work-culture-collect-feedback-with-sascha-eder-and-phil-laboon-a21c1bdbc9fc 11--it's not that any single one of these articles alone are a "slam dunk" to keeping the article, but combined together, they show the subject meets GNG). I also think that if there are any problems with the article in its current form, they are fixable, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: Looks like your typical (i.e. non-notable) early stage tech startup.  I don't put much weight in TechCrunch or VentureBeat.  They're , certainly, but they're rather indiscriminate about what they write about.  If you're a tech startup and send them a press release, they'll probably cover it.  Please see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:THREE)

Comment: Hey {{u|Renzoy16}}, great!! But your !vote is likely to be discounted (as per ) so perhaps you can link to *any two* references that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability below and then perhaps some of the Delete !voters will |change their minds
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS||WP:HEY)

Comment: Your admission that not "any single one of these articles alone" meets the criteria for establishing notability essentially translates to your agreement that according to our own guidelines this topic fails GNG and . Also, the references you've listed *all* fail the criteria for example funding notices, articles based on company announcements, podcasts with people affiliated with the company and articles written by people affiliated with the company. The examples you've provided are explicitly listed as *not* meeting the criteria for establishing notability as they fail  and/or  and/or are "trivial coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)