Deletion of HTMA Nutritional Balancing

Comment: as this is clearly a bad-faith and y nomination. Bmartinsen recently made huge edits to this article which violated numerous policies, most notably  and . Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#HTMA_Nutritional_Balancing|A discussion on the fringe theories noticeboard saw him trying to undo others' edits by mislabelling them as vandalism and ultimately blanking said discussion in what I suspect was an act of censorship. I can only imagine that Bmartinsen is throwing the proverbial toys out of the proverbial pram by starting this AfD, where he has given no valid criteria for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: even after reading Agricolae's notes.  Yes the original AFD nomination was in bad faith but after looking for independent reliable secondary sources covering the thing named in the title of the article, "HTMA Nutritional Balancing", there are no sources to be found to support passing .  It appears that the general topic of Hair analysis (alternative medicine) is a thing worth its own article, and Quackwatch covers the general topic of http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/hair.html Commercial Hair Analysis, but not the particular "HTMA Nutritional Balancing".  That particular thing appears to be a name-brand service offered by Analytical Research Laboratories, associated with the now deceased Dr. Paul Eck.  All the alternative medicine sites that I found that offer "HTMA Nutritional Balancing" are resellers of that company's product.  There are no independent reliable secondary sources that cover that specific product.  Result should be delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:42)