Deletion of Doist (2nd nomination)

Comment: If an article is nom'd for deletion by someone and recreated by that person without reasoning that in many ways is a concerning thing; as it avoids in my view an unethical avoidance of attribution.  This creation was in fact a somewhat untypically article for this creator; and the creator has nominated better for deletion themselves so there might be questions if this article was created in expectation it might be sent for deletion.  There are possibilies  may exist for article retention and if so I have objection to  of the deleted article of perhaps {{u|Barkeep49}} might indicate if a histmerge is possible.  Thankyou.Special:Contributions/86.158.216.81|86.158.216.81
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:REFUND)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)