Deletion of List of passengers and crew onboard RMS Titanic

Comment: Does someone have a principled response to the question: how is this different from List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre, which has survived Afd? While a certain essay says other crap exists is not a good argument to keep, but another essay  argues that if we keep the recent we should be especially keen to keep the documented past
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: as Mandsford has argued. The division by ''point of embarkation'' simply makes it clear this is |indiscriminate. I am inclusionist with lists that at least have a rationale; this does not. (Encyclopedic would list survivors and victims, for example. I note that http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Casualties_of_the_RMS_Titanic_sinking Casualties of the RMS Titanic sinking was successfully prodded. I might have argued against that at AFD, but I'm not inclined to DRV either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Listcruft is not policy, and this list doesn't even appear to meet the criteria set out by |Listcruft. -- |&#x2611
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:CI)