Deletion of Conquest (military)

Comment: We have over 3 million articles and 99% of them are of less than good quality.  We keep them in mainspace because this is our |editing policy - readers will find them there and hopefully improve them.  The suggestion that the conquest article is only a dictionary definition is wrong.  There is plenty of room for expansion.  The deletion +tag was posted when the article was only a few minutes old
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: The article is a |stub not a dictionary entry.  This nominator needs to do more than cite the  policy but must also explain how it is relevant, as the article contains no etymology or other lexical content.  I have expanded the article further from a good source.  This was easily done and such expansion is our reason for retaining stubs in mainspace, as explained by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB||WP:DICDEF)