Deletion of List of problems solved by MacGyver (2nd nomination)

Comment: The relevant real world context is in the main MacGyver article, if the people working on this article could include some of the real world information in this article, that would be great. It is OK to source the actual problems that MacGyver solves from the TV programme itself, per #Primary_information. I suggest moving the article to List of MacGyverisms
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: This is essentially a collection of |plot snippets, not an encyclopedic article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: This is perfect for a fan wiki, but totally unsuitable in content and presentation for wikipedia. Major #PLOT and  issues and more. That Macguyver was inventive can be said and illustrated in two short paragraphs in the main article, so listing every occurence in every episode is completely unnecessary. (I checked, but I couldn't find a macguyver wikia. This doesn't mean that this article should remain on wikipedia.) &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT)

Comment: fails lot, , ict, .  Basically a long list of plot elements with no real world conetext, that relies on primary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:WAF||WP:F||WP:RS)

Comment: Funny how everyone ignores lot, article hopelessly fails policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: as largely unverifiable, trivial, and |indiscriminate info. Title is also very POV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Article is verifiable per .  As for notability, the list doesn't do the best job of showing it in its current incarnation, but I feel that the article can show notability per Quasirandom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)