Deletion of Geet (TV series)

Comment: and trim the heck out of the plot section (yikes). The nom's concerns toward sources are addressed through a simple search which finds http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2010&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Geet%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Geet%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go numerous English sources.  And sorry Orange Mike... but the project is far better served by considering Seraphimblade's concerns at the very few sources in the current unimproved article, and then |using the available found sources to clean up and expand using with the critical commentary found about the Indian soap opera.  Deletion of something so emminently improvable, does not serve the project... nor its readers.  Notable in India, is |notable enough for en.Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:CSB)

Comment: Reviewing the sources in the article: 1 is a press release, and so is discounted entirely. 2, 3, and 5 do not list actual authors of the articles in question, and are from OneIndia, a source which expressly disclaims fact checking or accuracy (see its http://www.oneindia.in/disclaimer.shtml disclaimer), and so is by its own admission not |reliable. Finally, source 4 mentions the subject only in passing. I can't find anything better than this. Just providing several sources does not show notability&mdash;the sources must be reliable (discounting any source which expressly says it cannot be relied on), unaffiliated with the subject (discounting any press releases), and cover the subject to a significant degree (discounting any source which covers the subject in passing while largely talking about something else). I can't see that there is sufficient sourcing to sustain the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)