Deletion of South Kensington crash

Comment: per . Absolutely unbelievable that this non-event has an article. What next? A page about http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41540081 that woman who tried to climb over the gates of Buckingham Palace
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per . There's been a brief flurry of attention paid to those who jumped to the wrong conclusion, but this doesn't justify an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)

Comment: as per nom. Routine news coverage of something that is not otherwise notable had it not initially been misinterpreted as something bigger. As GracefulSlick said, had we waited for the first police press briefing (as I think we always should before creating such articles), we wouldn't be here. I'm ambivalent about merging to the Exhibition Rd article. As traffic accident, definitely not notable as event to add. As a kind of reflection about media and police overreaction, it may just be of interest. But in a different context, probably failing . I'm just thinking back to London in the 80s and 90s. If we'd include every suspect IRA "package" that causes a scare with similar police cordons that in the end turns out to be nothing, we'd need hundreds such entries. The difference to the 90s, if you'd miss the 20 second clip in the local news that evening, you wouldn't even know it happened. pseudonym
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)

Comment: Another classic and prime example of ot#News|news coverage and |recentism, rearing its ugly head. Wikipedia is not a news outlet and these article must be stamped on. I just wish a boat load of other articles would go exactly the same way. This is the worst example of initial news coverage leading to branding of terrorism, this should serve as a catalyst to put the brakes on other crap spewed from the same orifice having an article created and then defended to the hilt by news-mongers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RECENT)

Comment: Perhaps if we waited for the news to clarify the story instead of |rushing to create "articles" (secondhand news reports) we wouldn't even need to be here. |Wikipedia is not a newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:NOTNEWS)