Deletion of Religion in Futurama

Comment: Fails , as it has not generated significant coverage.  While there are a number of footnotes in the article, most of them refer the DVD commentary.  The only published sources referred to are by the same author, and are about the ''Simpsons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There are sufficient secondary sources in the article to establish notability.  While the article does suffer from a few  issues, they are surmountable and cause for ''cleanup'' '''not''' ''deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: As opposed to the recently deleted Robots in Futurama article this article is referenced from a variety of reliable secondary sources. The relevant guideline here is  "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Likewise in  "Topics within a fictional universe are notable if they have received substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Non-notable information should be deleted only when other options have been exhausted." The article satisfies the need for secondary sources and out of universe context and thus meets  rather than failing it as claimed here. The subject not being "extremely important for the show" is the nominator's opinion and not a reason for deletion under Wikipedia:Deletion Policy. I'll agree the article needs cleanup and probably some trimming but deletion is not the answer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:FICT)