Deletion of East Carolina Pirates future football schedules

Comment: This is completely different from the United States presidential election.  No one officially knows who will be in the 2016 etc presidential elections, that IS .  The future football schedules I have listed are in a contract and outside of extraneous forces, they will occur.  Plus having every future season as its own page isn't very concise and would be better for all of the end-users to use.  Also, previous season's have different ways of disseminating this information.  Some have a 10-year "block" to show the schedule and results, such as Texas A&M Aggies football, 1930–1939.  Other teams have it by their coach like Penn State Nittany Lions football under Joe Paterno (as an Independent).  The second one couldn't be used because it would be  to assume the present coach would be here for the next season.  I don't see why something like the 10-year block for the future schedules isn't appropriate.  Here's to being 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BOLD)

Comment: Have we read  lately
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BALL)

Comment: From : "If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include the 2012 U.S. presidential election and 2020 Summer Olympics. By comparison, the 2020 U.S. presidential election and 2036 Summer Olympics are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. Avoid predicted sports team line-ups, which are inherently unverifiable and speculative." - Most of the times and some of the venues are 'TBA'. I think an argument can be made for the 2012 schedule but not for anything beyond that. The article iteself claims that UConn is expected to be canceled but that this report is unconfirmed. With so much up in the air, I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I agree that it does not violate ; while the individual games might not be notable enough for standalone articles, the seasons certainly will be, and the games once scheduled are highly likely to actually be played.  The article also does not violate ; the closest thing a football season has to a "track list" is a list of scheduled games, and that is precisely what the article is listing.  Sourcing is for the most part high-quality, being from local newspapers.  The media frequently reports on teams scheduling future out of conference opponents as demonstrated by the sourcing in the article; it is not "trivial" as asserted by the nominator.  I believe the material in the article meets  and therefore should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:HAMMER||WP:GNG)

Comment: his will definately be a notable topic, but not under this title and not today. There just aren't sufficient reliable sources available. Until the schedule is annouced, this article will be completely based on conjecture and rumor and is merely  ball gazing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)