Deletion of Barack Obama's first 100 days

Comment: and encourage the authors to contribute to other WP articles on the Obama presidency. The problem with this one is that it's a prediction of the future, in violation of rystal ball.  Only people to whom history gives the label "Hundred Days (disambiguation)|Hundred Days" for a period of their lives should get a 100 days article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Any relevant info is already in Presidential transition of Barack Obama. The rest is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: I guess we could merge it, but I've got a feeling we might have to recreate it{{spaced ndash}}or something similar{{spaced ndash}}later on, per . Articles of this kind tend to get excessively large; the Barack Obama article is 136k and even the Presidential transition of Barack Obama|transition article is almost 80k
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: any appropriate |verfiable information to Presidency of Barack Obama as appropriate. I don't think it's really a #CBALL|"crystal ball" violation as the content as presented is generally reporting on speculation rather than being speculative itself. However I'm not convinced that at this stage the topic warrents a seperate page or that it can even be definded as a seperate topic given the somewhat mishmash nature of how it is sourced and put together
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT)