Deletion of Tomas Gorny (4th nomination)

Comment: What I see is the same group of editors attempting to prevent the existence of an otherwise  notable article. A few of the editors commenting here also appeared at the article about Draft:Nextiva|Nextiva, one of the companies run by Gorny and tried to prevent its creation, despite it having close to 30 references. It's hard to assume good faith when the same thing happens over and over again with the same people involved. {{nowrap
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: It’s no surprise that K.e.coffman is the one nominating this article for deletion after SwisterTwister, whom I believe is the former editor’s |meatpuppet fails when he tried to do the '''Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tomas_Gorny_(3rd_nomination)|exact same thing'''. The http://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=SwisterTwister&users=K.e.coffman&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki Editor Interaction Analyzer shows that both of these individuals edit within one minute of each other on the same article, sometimes just 2 seconds apart! This evidence '''strongly suggests''' offsite collaboration between the two. Faithful editors have repeatedly tried to add sources, such as articles by ''https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianrashid/2017/03/21/3-lessons-about-bouncing-back-from-rock-bottom-every-entrepreneur-must-know/#51862e717ff5 Forbes'' and ''https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/167764 Entrepreneur'', to the article, but both of these characters '''Talk:Tomas_Gorny#Survey|magically show up together''' and collectively oppose such efforts. This  of Wikipedia needs to stop. This is an encyclopaedia, not a personal playground
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT||WP:GAMING)

Comment: Google News lists 398 news search results related to Tomas Gorney. He is definitely covered by the business news press (and his press is positive). The major newspaper The ''Chicago Tribune'' published a story entitled "An inspiring story of Nextiva CEO Tomas Gorny".http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/community/chi-ugc-article-an-inspiring-story-of-nextiva-ceo-tomas-gorny-1-2016-06-23-story.html The ''Huffington Post'' published a story which was titled "Destination American Dream: Technology Innovator Tomas Gorny Shares His Story".http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/community/chi-ugc-article-an-inspiring-story-of-nextiva-ceo-tomas-gorny-1-2016-06-23-story.html.  Gorny passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as promotionalism.  is policy. Full stop. We give a lot of leeway to clean up around here when an article has been shown to meet the GNG, but borderline notability cases like this that have been delete before, and then recreated and still have the same promotionalism issues can be deleted per NOTSPAM
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM)

Comment: by all means as the main policies here at hat Wikipedia is not and aid, considering the history and also of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination) and Draft:Nextiva, both with clear promotional changes and users, including some of them now come-and-go accounts so WP:Sockpuppetry likely applies there. These three are main policies of which we use every day here, especially in company or business articles, so this is a no exception. We allow time for improvements when there's confirmed changes, not when  SOURCES or . As mentioned, if someone ever wants an article, it's best to restart it with pre-reviewed changes, especially if there's chances of violating our paid-user policy. Although there are claims of "fixing" as shown https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tomas_Gorny&action=history here, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tomas_Gorny&offset=20170324012912&action=history the next page actually then shows there's been nothing but the previous old AfD-material, thus showing any new claims of supposed improvements are stalling, not beneficial to an encyclopedia. ''In fact'', the current article still has the same elements of advertising as shown by his largest section advertised "Business" followed by "PR awards", which is (as shown by WP:GNG), not ever a convincing factor. Simply because a Wikipedian started this article is not an entire defense in our policies, since there's the obvious fact of the company's article not only being deleted, but it was campaigned by several COI people there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:P||WP:THEREMUSTBE||WP:ITSNOTABLE)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM)

Comment: Tomas Gorny alone gets https://www.google.com/#q=%22Tomas+Gorny%22&* 8,590 Google hits, not to mention the amount of Google hits that his companies receive. A cursory look at the sources used in the article shows that Tomas Gorny does have notability, at least that sufficient to warrant the existence of an article her. Meatpuppetry issues raised by User:Eliko007 and User:Rhododendrites should be taken into account by the closing admin and reports should be filed at fCU if necessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: Passes.  In my opinion, SwisterTwister’s approach here is more destructive than constructive, and I know this has been mentioned in the past. Did anybody bother to check online about subject’s notability? The article was published by a confirmed contributor, and has been voted Keep by several senior editors and admins in the previous AfDs. We are now at the 4th nomination, and will go on to subsequent ones until the nominators get what they want. This is simply abuse and not the way AfD was intended. The subject easily meets , and that’s enough reason to keep the article. I’m opting to remain anonymous here to avoid any subsequent drama, just wanted to assist in the discussion.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/88.27.194.58|88.27.194.58
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article remains near-entirely promotional after multiple AfDs.If someone without COI wants to start over again, it can be attempted in Draft space.|Salt as of now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: The subject has over http://www.bing.com/search?q=Tomas+Gorny&qs=n&form=QBLH&sp=-1&pq=tomas+gorn&sc=8-10&sk=&cvid=C529DBA49A154026B3C398770FE5FEAE 155,000 hits in the Bing search engine. The sources in the article as it stands now, and the article before many of the sources were removed by other editors, meet . This is the fourth nomination now and it's time to accept the article and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:DROPTHESTICK)

Comment: Fails , , and  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO||WP:NOT)