Deletion of The Bradfords Group

Comment: Far from an ideal article, but a company with 38 branches probably ghas sufficient public profile to need an article.  TEchnically the historical aspects may be a variety of , but is it suggested that they are false?  WP:V requires that information should be verifable, not that it should be referenced, though being referenced properly is always desirable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This is the very epitome of |original historical research. The sources are essentially primary; the resulting material is a . Notability is not produced simply because someone can dig out these sources, and indeed, the message here is that this is the routine story of a business which started out as a family concern and grew, modestly, from there. Such companies exist in the millions, and there's nothing here which distinguishes this from the rest of the pack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTHESIS)