Deletion of Marko Lens

Comment: The nominator overstates his case, using rather aggressive language which is really not necessary here. Remember that  applies across namespaces, including the AfD pages; there is no need for disparaging comments about the subject and it is also not clear if this is indeed a  case. The nominator neglected to notify the article's creator about this AfD, which I have now done. Although the article does not mention it, the subject holds a PhD, in addition to his medical professional degrees, and appears to be a bona fide researcher. GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Marko%20Lens%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws does show one well-cited paper (with 147 citations), but the citations fairly quickly taper of after that, for an H-index of about 10. That's respectable but not enough to demonstrate academic notability, especially in medicine. There is nothing else in the record to indicate passing  (no significant academic awards, journal editorships, etc). Similarly, nothing to indicate passing . Overall, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:AUTO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: He doesn't seem to pass  but there's an outside chance of passing  instead — I found several hits for his name in Google news archive http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22marko+lens%22. The reason I'm going for a weak delete rather than a weak keep, given this evidence, is that the hits I found did not seem to be very high quality or anything we could use as a source about him: they consisted of articles in tabloids such as the Daily Mail and breathless publicity pieces in cosmetics magazines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)