Deletion of Celia Reina

Comment: It's a solid start, but assistant professors rarely meet  C1, and it certainly looks  in this case.  I don't see any other evidence of notability.  Comment that "term" as part of a named position at the assistant professor level often indicates a postdoc; that doesn't appear to be the case here, as Penn appears to put "term" as part of the name of also their senior named chairs.  But in any case, named positions below full professor are explicitly excluded (cannot "be applied reliably") from  C5.  And the early career and student awards do not contribute to notability, as {{u|Kj cheetham}} has already pointed out
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:TOOSOON||WP:NPROF)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON, does not pass . There are large numbers of women in academia whose accomplishments are notable, full stop, rather than merely seeming notable "for a woman", and who are not yet represented by articles here (for instance, hundreds of them, most or all passing , at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Fellowships). Fixing the gender gap does not require lowering our standards and stooping to tokenism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Looking at "Major Honors and Awards" from https://creina4.wixsite.com/celiareinaresearch/cv : 5 look like very early career awards, 2 are postdoc fellowships, and one is a named Assistant Professor chair (but not a full professor). It's only the latter I'm unsure about - the others don't really contribute notability, but show potential of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)