Deletion of Mana Up

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: per Highking. Note that both the keep !votes ("Oppose deletion", as they put it) unfortunately seem to appear to misunderstand our rigid |sourcing requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDY)

Comment: Not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and containing |independent content (i.e. ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''). Just about all the references rely entirely on information provided by the company and contain no Independent Content or are run-of-the-mill listings or are based on profiles of the client accelerator companies and all fail  and/or . https://www.hpr2.org/post/bytemarks-caf-mana-update#stream/0 This from Bytemarks Café podcast and http://www.bytemarkscafe.org/tag/mana-up/ this one are based on interviewing company execs, fails , https://www.entrepreneur.com/slideshow/293974 This Entrepreneur profile also is based on an interview, fails , https://www.ksbe.edu/imua/article/mana-up-initiative-gives-native-hawaiian-businesses-a-boost/ This from KSBE (the company's Title Sponsor) article, https://ediblehi.com/a-recipe-for-success-how-mana-up-is-helping-hawaii-agricultural-companies/ Edible Hawaii's profile of one of this company's accelerator clients, fails ORGIND, https://www.gohawaii.com/listing/mana-up/104643 this from gohawaii.com is a run-of-the-mill listing and fails ORGIND and/or , https://www.hawaiibusiness.com/mana-up/ this from Hawaii Business is based on a company announcement of their launch and accompanying press interviews, fails ORGIND, https://www.hawaiibusiness.com/20-for-20-brittany-heyd/ This also from Hawaii Business is a profile piece on a co-founder which relies entirely on an interview, fails ORGIND, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/the-scene-week-of-april-29/2013/04/26/2dce00f6-ac72-11e2-a8b9-2a63d75b5459_story.html this Washington Post reference doesn't mention this company and is irrelevant for notability, https://www.mauinews.com/news/local-news/2017/05/entrepreneurs-get-a-dose-of-inspiration-at-medbs-three-day-startup-weekend/ this from Maui News is also irrelevant as it doesn't mention this company, https://www.kitv.com/story/39385865/authentic-local-products-stem-from-work-made-with-aloha-like-lahaole this from KITV4 is a description of a TV segment where a co-founder was interviewed, fails ORGIND, https://www.pacificedgemagazine.com/2018-business-achievement-awards-winners/2018awardwinners/ this from Pacific Edge is based on a company announcement (same as the Hawaii Business article) and uses the standard company profile, fails ORGIND. Finally, https://www.hawaiibusiness.com/small-business-awards-2019-editors-choice/ this from Hawaii Business  is an Editor's Choice award and is based entirely on information provided by the company, fails ORGIND. Topic company, like all companies, does PR. That doesn't mean it is notable. Topic fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)