Deletion of Abra, Arizona

Comment: Per : "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low." By definition, the USGS designation is legal recognition of the place. And the USGS listing gives the location the definition of a "populated place". The fact that it is also located within a CDP is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: It is a populated, legally recognized place, and per , that's enough by itself. I personally think that definition in  is far too broad, because it automatically justifies the existence of articles like this, and I don't see any information online that could ever expand this article beyond a stub - but that being said, until that standard is changed, this article is a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: per  & One1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: this is a real, albeit it very small, rural community, as |can be found easily online at Google Maps, news, etc. That it once had a railroad stop indicates it was probably more populated. |Past precedents have "kept" several ghost town stubs (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/McGrawville,_New_York, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Theba,_Arizona, and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ong%27s_Hat,_New_Jersey). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bara-Hack,_Connecticut&action=history Bara-Hack was Prodded before being |rescued by me and others. This differs, say, from a small mobile home, housing complex or trailer park, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A-1_Trailer_Park,_Arizona|to which we've deleted and that Special:Contributions/Bearian|I've argued for their deletion as recently as today several times. This place appears
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:HEY)