Deletion of Pakistan and the apartheid analogy

Comment: As the nominator points out, the sources do not even mention "apartheid", making the whole content original research and the article a  for the topic "Ahmaddiya Muslims in Pakistan". That is a notable topic, but is already better covered at Ahmadiyya#Pakistan at substantially the same level of detail. A subarticle should only be created if there is more to say about this topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Why on earth was this extended?  The 3 calls for keeping were insipid |"it's notable! with no no substance whatsoever.  This is a poorly |cobbled-together, |pointy attempt to counterbalance the hated-in-certain-POV-circles Israel and the apartheid analogy article; the problem is, you can't simply stitch a few disparate events together and call it "Pakistani apartheid".  The last time this stunt was pulled, it led to ArbCom, a row of AfDs, and the blocking or departure of a number of the perpetrators
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:SYNTH||WP:POINT)