Deletion of Maxime Masson (medical student)

Comment: So far it has been shown that the subject of this article has written letters that have been published in a few places, including a couple in a newspaper and a handful in medical journals. As well as these comment and opinion pieces, the subject of this article has also written some essays that were accepted by online magazines articles that specifically invite contributions from students. For a healthcare professional this pattern of correspondence and creative output is not currently enough to meet  in my estimation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Drchriswilliams. I can't locate any independent, significant coverage of this subject. The subject's own writing doesn't come close to meeting even the relatively easy standard of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Deletion rationale is without merit and violates  as well. The subject appears to satisfy . We don't automatically delete articles on notable subjects because we suspect a COI. If the article contains promotional language then it should be cleaned up. AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Article seems to respect WP's |notability guidelines, although more secondary sources would be welcome... I guess those will come eventually. For the moment, article satisfies  as per , , and . Initial authors were in accordance with  and ; on my part as per . Perhaps  with initial author
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ALIVE||WP:NPOV||WP:VERIFY||WP:NOR||WP:BOLD||WP:RELY||WP:IPHUMAN||WP:COI)