Deletion of List of computer hardwares

Comment: seemingly random list of |indiscriminate information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: This article appears to be a definite benefit for the general reader, in particular as a useful index. Also, per , "Overlapping categories, lists and navigation templates" are not perceived as duplication on Wikipedia. Furthermore, "it is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative." Hence, saying that we have categories that cover such lists seems to be a weak argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: Qualifies for an article per  relative to :Category:Computer hardware. Also qualifies as a functional navigational aid per . An easily expandable and improvable article. I have performed some additions and copy edits to the article, including the addition of some references, something that cannot be done with categories. I have renamed the article to List of computer hardware
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: and '''rename List of computer hardware''' (or another name). At first I thought this would be a list of all products ever offered to sale to attach to a computer, but a list of the ''types'' of hardware is fine. I doubt this list will ever reach 100 entries as there are not a million computer architectures out there. It meets  #1 (list with all elements standalone-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC)

Comment: as it passes , but expand to include basic information about each listed item, which would make it much more useful to anyone who comes across it (see List of vegetable oils, a featured list, for a good example of this being done in an acceptable manner). I would also suggest (if consensus dictates that this list fails the inclusion criteria) '''merging''' into computer hardware, with each item on the list becoming a section of the article, which already includes most of the items on the list as is. My only major concern is that this list is  to computer hardware, though this is unlikely, since "categories, lists, and navboxes that contain the same elements are typically allowed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STAND||WP:REDUNDANT)

Comment: Per , Wikipedia contains lots of lists and this is fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)