Deletion of Awesome Video Games

Comment: I don't have quite the energy to analyze whether or not I truly believe this is worth keeping, but I did want to point out that they got an LATimes blog entry on the 11th, which would count as .  http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/funny_pages_20/2008/07/awesome-video-g.html  Google News implies a trivial mention in Electronic Gaming Monthly http://news.google.com/archivesearch?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADBF_enUS264US264&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Awesome+Video+Games%22, but it's behind a registration screen so I can't speak to the quality of the source myself. I may do some more research and then cast a vote, but for now I'm just sharing sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: AFD runs for five days.  That would give the article supporters six days to find sources that satisfy ,  and .  If such sources are not available, then deleting the article six days after creation is perfectly valid
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: non-notable, no reliable sources. Kotaku is a blog (though probably one of the more noteworthy ones), and thus not a reliable source per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: A whole lot of  is going on in here. Adding a reference to the pile that some claim doesn't exist. http://kotaku.com/gaming/screw-attack/video-games-awesome-198415.php Kotaku
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTKNOWIT)