Deletion of Jorge E. Meneses

Comment: Strictly speaking, it's not relevant whether a mayor served a full term or not — what's relevant to making a mayor notable enough for an article, regardless of how long he did or didn't serve as mayor, is genuine substance about his mayoralty and quality |reliable sourcing. But this article just states that he exists, gives a minimal profile of his prior background, and references just ''one'' piece of media coverage — but every single person who was ever mayor of anywhere would always qualify for an article if this was all that was required. To qualify, a mayor has to be shown as significantly ''more'' notable than most other mayors for some genuinely substantive reason, not just to be single-sourced as existing. To be fair, we ''were'' a lot looser about the notability of mayors a decade ago than we are now — there was actually once a time when the simple fact of being a mayor was commonly seen as enough, even in small villages of just a couple hundred people — but the standards have been significantly tightened up, and old articles that predate the tightening of the inclusion criteria for mayors are not grandfathered just because they met the standards of their creation time: if they can't be ''upgraded'' to meet the standards that pertain ''now'', they go away
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)