Deletion of Sony FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS

Comment: WP:NOTDIRECTORY, , borderline .  May perhaps merit a mention in a more general article about the product family.  There are sites and magazines dedicated to such merchandise which will advertize every product, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia.  It should cover pioneering devices and technology but not catalog everything.  Think about what people will be looking for in an encyclopedia in 20 years from now; they will expect coverage of but the most notable products, those which pioneered innovations and influenced a generation.  This will also result in complete articles which have much to say rather than many stubs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:ADVERT)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a catalog of every product which is offered for sale.   Most lenses and cameras which have been offered for sale in the last hundred years or so have had some reviews in photo magazines or, in more recent years, websites. Coincidentally, those same magazines often received ad revenue from the makers of the products they reviewed and the websites which reviewed camera products  typically had "click to buy" or a "shopping" tab, making it questionable whether they are "independent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: There are plenty of independent sources available online for this lens. It certainly passes . Just about every piece of photographic equipment from a major manufacturer will be reviewed. See for example http://briansmith.com/sony-a9-camera-fe-100-400mm-gm-lens-review/ https://www.pcmag.com/review/353275/sony-fe-100-400mm-f4-5-5-6-gm-oss http://www.thephoblographer.com/2017/04/27/first-impressions-sony-100-400mm-f4-5-5-6-gm-fe-sony-e-mount-full-frame/. I am suspecting that the nominator has not been through efore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:B)