Deletion of Rally fries

Comment: The article satisfies ; the sources aren't overwhelming, but they're enough. There are ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'' and ''Tri-City Herald'' articles focused entirely on the topic. This is really the only principle that applies. The other arguments are  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ITSLOCAL||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: This article is about a promotion, but it is not promotional when multiple independent sources provide non-trivial coverage. In addition to sources in article, see http://mlb.mlb.com/content/printer_friendly/mlb/y2008/m05/d07/c2657580.jsp MLB.com and http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2009/07/22/655251/spreading-love-for-safeco-rally.html Tri-City Herald. http://aol.sportingnews.com/mlb/story/2009-07-06/ranking-ballparks-nos-6-30 Sporting News mentions it as something to "love about" Safeco. It received a reference in a http://books.google.com/books?id=tOYkaE995hwC&pg=PA58&dq=%22rally+fries%22+seattle&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yg9tT9yTEqebiAKY55XTBQ&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22rally%20fries%22%20seattle&f=false a book.  There's enough sourced information to satify , and the number of trivial references in other sources convince me that this is suitable for Wikipedia, which expands beyond a traditional encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)