Deletion of Boonsong Chaisingkananont

Comment: Not proven to be notable under , but there is quite enough on him and the controversy - he was accused of Lese majeste over exam questions and refuses to provide the students' exam papers. This type of article is not really what  is for, which is much more for people incidentally, not integrally and actively involved in "an" event. (Prolonged situation and dispute are better descriptions here.) There is no "larger subject" and by his own decisions he has not  "essentially remained a low-profile individual."   Renaming is a kind of keep, not really for AfD, and in this case clumsy and not too sensible - it does not in any way protect anyone and is more appropriate for things like murders
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Does not seem to pass notability requirements under  or . DGG states that “a mid-level academic who takes on the King of Thailand is notable”. I agree, but only if he or she does that consistently over the years, and gains notability as a result of that. Otherwise, what we have is a “one event” incident, which is covered in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:1E)

Comment: I agree with DGG's comment above and was going to say much the same. That the notability is related to his job is important, and notable cases like this involving academic freedom should be kept as a general principle.  In fact he ''does'' satisfy  - under #7 "The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity." ( or #4 "The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.")  BLP1E generally advises merging, not deletion, though it is frequently misapplied that way.  Because he is notable for something integral to his lifework as an academic,  it is illogical to use it here. If an academic or author writes one paper or book that is important enough, that can make him notable.  Should we delete such articles? Should Chaisingkananont get accused of Lese majeste against a different king
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)