Deletion of Ethan Haas Was Right

Comment: No |reliable sources. Cruft-filled, speculation-filled... no reason to believe a film which may or mayn't be connected with this game will increase its notability upon release because ''there's no evidence of that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Not only is this ancruft, it has nothing to do with the movie that has made this site supposedly "notable". Just more garbage trying to jump on a bandwagon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F)

Comment: non-notable game with no good |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: because it fails  in several ways: 1) It has ''not'' been reported in a non-trivial manner by any reliable published works, and the websites fail to be reliable because they establish no significant real-world context and just play the puzzles.  There is no established, verified background for this game, which may very well be spam -- per sourced information at Cloverfield, a Paramount spokesperson and J. J. Abrams have said that the site does not belong to them.  There is the headline of the week and should not warrant an ensure an entire article, especially based on movie blogs and minor movie sites.  This being the case, this ''will'' suffer from recentism.  Wikipedia is not a news repository
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per WP:NOT - WP is not a game guide and per  for http://news.google.com/news?um=1&tab=wn&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22Ethan+Haas+Was+Right%22&scoring=n lack of significant coverage by independent media.  Only trivial mentions found through there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)