Deletion of List of Guantanamo Bay detainees accused of possessing Casio watches

Comment: looking at the article Casio F91W, there was no reason to create a |sub-article as the article never came close to reaching the article size described in . Therefore, it clearly appears to be a . A cursory search for sources shows that the subject of the list has received passing mentions in multiple |reliable sources but none that I would consider |significant coverage in those sources to suggest to me that the subject of the list is notable as defined by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SUBARTICLE||WP:TOOLONG||WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: This "article" consists almost entirely of original research, relying upon primary sources, to wit: court/tribunal documents in violation of . I removed them two years ago, but one of the editors who made these articles on Casio watches and Guantanamo detainees a pet project put them back in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPPRIMARY)