Deletion of Paul King (New Zealand) (2nd nomination)

Comment: has received enough news coverage to meet . An article with greater than trivial coverage in the NZ Heraldhttp://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=134294, plus several other mentionshttp://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10115138http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=3564302http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=2097866http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=2049568. Likely would have been greater coverage in The Press, but the stuff.co.nz archive doesn't go back far enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP is not publicity for potential, but failed political careers, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)