Deletion of West Bank bantustans

Comment: The article is well sourced and covers the subject in detail. It passes . There seems no valid reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly a  of  Israel and the apartheid analogy  that deals with the subject in non neutral matter without giving proper contest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per above, especially as a POV fork, and as . This is one of those topics I've seen a ''lot'' of lately: technically well sourced, but not about the topic really. A source might refer to apple, and another pie, but neither is about apple pie. Or, another example: a essay about Granny Smith apple pie
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: for those editors suggesting this topic should be covered within Israeli_occupation_of_the_West_Bank, I suggest you read . That article is already 109,936 of readable prose
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOBIG)

Comment: as this is a  of Palestinian National Authority (PNA), that since 2006 only controls areas A and B of the West Bank, so Palestinian National Authority in the West Bank is more or less the same. Referring to the Palestinian National Authority as a "bantustan", let alone "bantustans" plural, is pejorative. The article is a recently created  mess of criticisms of the PNA, both in its present form and in possible further peace deals. In addition to the PNA article, Wikipedia has a multitude of additional articles covering the same topic from different angles that are not a TNT mess
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:TNT)