Deletion of Pablo Hernan Pereyra

Comment: Not a notable mathematician, and no useful es turn up on a search. There's no way somebody finds a simple proof of FLT ''and'' proves http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0701188 Goldbach's conjecture in seven pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."  calls for a ''credible'' claim of significance. A short proof (short enough to almost fit inside the margins of a book!) of the Fermat-Wiles Theorem would be big news, we would not need to be scraping for solid references. On Wikipedia, notability is judged by what has already occurred and been noticed by others (i.e., reputable independent sources), not by potential. Using Pereyra's own proposal of a proof of the theorem as a source of notability constitutes |original research. After the alleged proof is validated by others and the news hits the headlines (if ever), THEN he can have an article. In the meantime, the editor of this article has been extremely uncooperative, has removed tags, engaged in edit wars, broken , and been blocked &mdash; such behavior indicates that should the page be deleted, it should also be salted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7||WP:OR||WP:3RR)

Comment: No evidence of being notable as a legitimate mathematician via  and also no evidence of being notable as a crank
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Not a notable mathematician, and no indication of notability for any other reason. Salting is unnecessary; |G4 would suffice in case of re-creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)