Deletion of M-Files

Comment: Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. Nearly all the refs provided are from the company or clear PR sites. The two exceptions a Finnish language blog and a Finnish language IT magazine, both deadlinks. Blogs are not . The IT magazine coverage cannot be assumed to be significant unless someone can provide a link or confirm they have read it. The Gartner 'magic quadrant' mentioned above has the same problem - it could be an incidental mention unless someone has $1000+ to pay to read the report to prove otherwise. With no clearcut, RS, significant coverage, there is no basis for keeping this. Also, Article was created by an Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA as possibly promotional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B)