Deletion of Sera Doğramacı

Comment: Appears to meet  #2. https://www.theicegarden.com/2017/4/23/15368564/australian-womens-ice-hockey-league-behind-the-mask-with-sera-dogramaci-of-the-sydney-sirens ref Represents Turkey on the senior national team. This in itself is notable: Turkish women in sports, though looks like the ice hockey section needs development
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)

Comment: Fails  No indication of wide |GNG. Article is well referenced (ignoring the unnecessary seven references to confirm she played for one Australian club), however all sources are essentially databases, stat sites or |brief routine mentions. For example, keep votes above cite Icelandic sources as an indication of GNG. Aside from the fact that these sources are articles on here team, not her, http://icelandreview.com/news/2014/03/25/photos-iceland-wins-against-turkey-ice-hockey-thriller the first one doesn't even mention her, whilst http://www.visir.is/g/2014140329380 the second is a very brief match report where she is mentioned in one sentence. Furthermore, I'm seeing significant elements of the information in the article being garnered from |primary sources. Would challenge other editors to provide a single instance of a significant, dedicated article on the player that might be used to support GNG. As an aside, I would also note that here scientific career does not add weight to notability as she fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails to meet . As for NHOCKEY #2, that applies to leagues that existed before professional hockey existed in the 1800's etc. And in the communist countries where "professional" leagues did not exist as their "amateur" leagues were essentially their professional leagues. Professional leagues exist in the world now and she isn't prevented from moving to play in them (as citizens of the communist countries were), so she has the ability (if she had the skill) to play in them. This is spelled out in the link NHOCKEY provides to show what leagues meet each criteria. Secondly  points out that you must play on a senior national team at the highest level of competition, she did not play on a national team that competed in the top level of the world championships or at the Olympics. Thirdly, while failing them does not mean they must be deleted, failing  which this subject does, does mean they should be deleted. I can find no sources that provide notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Despite the erroneous assertions of others, there is no element of NHOCKEY the subject meets, none at all.  The subject also fails , and I'm afraid this is just another of several recent AfDs on female Turkish hockey players where LauraHale just grabbed casual namedrops and roster listings off of Google (in one, she actually cited as a source of notability a mid-term grade online posting from a university course the subject had taken!!!), so at this point, I'm taking nothing on faith here: I want any keep proponent to identify the ''specific'' cites they claim satisfy the GNG. So far that's a challenge the keep proponents on these articles appear unwilling to address
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Why is this AfD focussed on hockey?   The subject's academic papers, although inappropriately referenced in the article, seem to have references which can be easily found and as far as I can tell have been cited by others a decent number of times.  The subject is/was also on the editorial board of a journal.  I suggest there is enough for a case for a low level of compliance with .  That combined with the subject's second string but not trivial hockey activity I believe is sufficient  to satisfy .   A subject does not have to pass any specific SNG if over all they pass GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: It's clear she doesn't meet  and I don't see that  is met.  That leaves .  At first glance it appears that there are plenty of sources, but after clicking on each one I don't see any that I believe qualify as significant and independent.  There are lots of stat sheets and routine sports reporting, but nothing that shows  is met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:NPROF||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Appears to pass  per the sources provided by {{u|LauraHale
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)