Deletion of Zamora (musician)

Comment: Image:Symbol keep vote.svg|15px  So, having fulfilled , with nothing more to argue, I ask to close this debate removing the AfD label of the article in both http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zamora_(musician) en.wiki & http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zamora_(m%C3%BAsico) es.wiki before of seven days otEarly, according to : "''..There are zero remaining arguments for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:N||WP:KEEP)

Comment: as insufficiently notable per the . Artist has not "''received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This debate reached the end.  fulfilled. I am not going to answer or post more comments here. Goodbye
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: not to pile on, but doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: This debate reached the end.  fulfilled. I am not going to answer or post more comments here. Goodbye
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: After reviewing the sources, the amazon.com page is a store listing and doesn't appear to be independent. Allmusic.com shows that his albums have been released on a private label, not a major label. Grammy.com does not corroborate that he's a voting member of the academy, only that he has an account on the site—and anybody can register for an account. I don't see any evidence of meeting  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Sorry, but that is not fair play. Only one criteria was needed for inclusion per . So, I suggest to stop voting or commenting until that a biblio comes to close the case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: No coverage, no notability. The insane rantings of SPAs does not change that. |Snow
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)