Deletion of Daecaunt

Comment: The only  criteria he comes close to meeting is #7: "''Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city''" (''if'' you consider MySpace to be a city, which is a huge stretch in itself), but according to one of the references, he's no longer in the top 10, which invalidates his only claim to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Important note''': Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is '''not''' a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article that fails to assert that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7." -quoting  '' What or who determines that a subject is important or significant? (if not the curiosity of exposed fans of any interactive subject such as an accomplishing artist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Appears to be an unsigned MySpace artist who has yet to release anything. I don't see anything that passes the criteria at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: With the exception of the Mass Hysteria link, all references are from self-published sources, mostly MySpace.  There is some evidence from the MySpace pages that this guy is getting popular, but that's |original research.  As per , if this guy gets significant media coverage in the future, the article can always be recreated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: just a MySpace artist, so remove for non-notability.  To author: will not prevent article being recreated if and when artist becomes |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)