Deletion of Rejuvenation Research

Comment: While the journal is not a |reliable source (like anything Aubrey de Grey writes), it is indeed |notable. This is a significant journal of the anti-aging community, has a solid impact factor (although it's mostly due to self-citations), has otability (academic journals)|a significant history, and has been around for quite a while, and is indexed by MEDLINE, Current Contents, Science Citation Index, Excerpta Medica, Scopus and CAB Abstracts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: fails  and al relevant criteria. Seems to be part of a PR campaign, by design or accident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)