Deletion of Early life and work of Clint Eastwood (2nd nomination)

Comment: the article should be kept because it is well sourced.  The  decided the data was of public interest and thereby published it; per policy, Wikipedia goes by the sources.  It would be quite artbitrary to say, well, the RS put out all this well-sourced material that meet all policies, but hey, we editors have decided the  were all wrong to cover the subject matters
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: The previous nomination was a unanimous Keep and this nomination does not make any new points.  Deletion would disrupt and destroy the attribution of the various contributions made to these pages over the years and so is inappropriate per ; ; ; &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:MAD||WP:PRESERVE)