Deletion of Theory of Electronic Conspiracy

Comment: I requested that the article's originating editor attempt to provide online references which may make verification easier.  If the books are indeed valid sources, then despite the logical flaws of the theory: #OR is irrelevant,  is not policy, and its fit into  can be disputed as the line between hoax and real conspiracy theory is iffy at best, especially considering some other conspiracy articles on Wikipedia. I concur, however, that Google does not appear to yield anything in either English or Spanish
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BOLLOCKS||WP:HOAX)

Comment: WP:HOAX or at the very least #OTHOUGHT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as |complete bollocks and about as notable/relevant as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: as pure |original research. The article claims that "a secret group has attempted to reach, for centuries, worldwide dominion by means of controlling the computerised information of the planet." Given the computer was invented about 70 years ago, I think we can call this one a hoax even by the abysmally low standards usually found in conspiracy theories
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)