Deletion of Historical realism

Comment: this is an awful article but it is a notable subject. A very very quick google scholar search brings up a journal article and a book reviewhttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8205(198003)40%3A3%3C420%3AHR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-9http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8205(198003)40%3A3%3C426%3AAHR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X  about the term.  These two sources on top of the list of sources at the page's bottom demonstrate |notability.  While there are no footnotes and while the page is written utterly improperly, the subject is itself notable enough for an article.  I'd also point out that a discussion of this term appears in ''Dictionary of Concepts in History''http://books.google.com/books?id=gQ0Xm54vpD8C&pg=PA370&dq=%22historical+realism%22&lr=&sig=ACfU3U2QJIN2lyCp1fY1JXDwXJhZ6-_Eughttp://books.google.com/books?id=gQ0Xm54vpD8C&pg=PA63&vq=Historical+realism&dq=%22historical+realism%22&lr=&source=gbs_search_s&sig=ACfU3U2tvowWbfCYpT_6_SMIfv-ZhG3HDwhttp://books.google.com/books?id=gQ0Xm54vpD8C&pg=PA64&vq=Historical+realism&dq=%22historical+realism%22&lr=&source=gbs_search_s&sig=ACfU3U0hbah_KtVQKmXMO3qwqBv0EWKzvw  .Any OR can be removed the page without having to the delete the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per . It looks like the editor who created the entire article is new and probably unfamiliar with policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)