Deletion of Cydney Mar (2nd nomination)

Comment: as advertisement.  I've found some offline writeups of her (such as The Globe and Mail 15 Feb 1983: F.2.).  It ''might'' be she qualifies for an article per , but somebody neutral would need to take the time to put the sources in a new article (with proper citations, including page numbers), and make an entirely new article, using nothing of the current version, keeping to only what reliable sources say.  As currently written, it could almost be speedied as blatant advertising, and keeping it would be rewarding spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)