Deletion of Danvers Statement

Comment: as non-notable - the "news" hits reported above are hardly the "mainstream news organisations" asked for in #News organizations| (excamples given are "The Washington Post", "The Times" and "The Associated Press" - I can't see that the "Raleigh Biblical Recorder" would be held in such high esteem!) --  JediLofty
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: 6 http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?q=%22Danvers+Statement%22 Google News hits, 60 http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Danvers+Statement%22 Google Books hits inc. a 50 word entry in http://books.google.com/books?id=syUupeVJOz4C&pg=PA170&dq=%22Danvers+Statement%22&ei=E4uqSLi1F4b-swPP8aWeBQ&sig=ACfU3U1ViQ-BHNSOFPQS7iGT322R-jwnoQ "Encyclopedia of evangelicalism" by Randall Herbert Balmer, 36 http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=%22Danvers+Statement%22 Google Scholar hits.  The full text of the statement is not encyclopedic, however printed encyclopedia often include large slabs of text like this, and Wikipedia has |no reason to exclude something like this when it is useful.  There is ample introduction to this Wikipedia article, and more sources can be added
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)