Deletion of Michael Charles Smith

Comment: Article is better with Pete's cuts (less violation of ), but still fails to meet  notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom.  It doesn't look like this fellow's thought of as notable IN Oregon either, given that a directed search has only 125 (not entirely relevant) G-hits http://www.google.com/search?q=Oregon+%22Michael+Charles+Smith%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&start=150&sa=N.  To address Mr. Smith's altogether-too-familiar rebuttal, Wikipedia is a private website with the right to decide what it is.  The Wikimedia Foundation has decided it is an encyclopedia ... |'''not''' a blog, '''not''' a soapbox for self-promotion, '''not''' some fuzzy New Age outreach program.  Many of those exist, and I suggest that this is less about What Wikipedia Could Become than in hijacking a popular and highly visible website for promotional purposes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: While he does not meet the criteria for |notability that in itself is not a criteria for deletion and should not stand alone. However, this article also does not adhere to Wikipedia's policy on |biographies of living people. That is why I believe it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:notability)