Deletion of Jon Main (2nd nomination)

Comment: Seems to be plenty of third-party sources as demonstrated by the link above.  This means he passes . If a subject passes the general notability guidelines, there is no need for the subject to pass the specific athlete/corp/music/etc. guidelines as well.  A high school player may be notable if he or she has significant coverage in reliable third party sources; the fact that they do not meet  as well does NOT take away from the notability met as per . Special:Contributions/Theseeker4|'''The'''&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE||WP:N)

Comment: He fell short of the required criteria back then, and he falls short now. Fails  as he has never played in a fully professional league, and there's nothing to suggest he's |notable in any other field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:N)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Disagree'''. As far as I am concerned, the article already passes , the subject passes the general notability guidelines, so there is no need for it to pass  and so on. The article got loads of references and links, besides the daily page view for the article is also quite high compared to other new entrants. The article passes the MAIN rules for article inclusion in Wikipedia so there is no need for deletion. The subject also have some importance to show. He holds many league records and is the current topscorer and so on. Main got "The People's Support". He is so like a champ to them. Special:Contributions/118.107.192.22|118.107.192.22
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: 40 goals in 41 games; leading league in scoring, well written and researched article.   would suggest that this type of article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CS)

Comment: Player fails thlete and from what I can see, also fails otability, the sources noted above on Google news are almost entirely match reports where the player is mentioned as having performed some action in the game (Main is expected to be fit for the game, Main scored a goal in this match - and so on), I do not think there are enough articles on him that constitute "Significant coverage" which as per otability means "that sources address the subject directly in detail". He may (or may not) be in a professional team soon and AFC Wimbledon may (or may not) be promoted this season but Wikipedia is definitely Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball|not a crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: per me. I believe he is likely to make it one day, but article should not actually exist until that day comes per . Unlike some, I don't believe a couple of lines in a newspaper is notability, it is merely sports journalists giving ordinary folk their 15 minutes of fame scrapping to make a living, --ClubOranje
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The player fails the guidelines at  and , set up to deal with exactly this type of situation. He may be the leagues top scorer this season, but so has a player every season and that doesn't infer notably. It is very questionable whether he passes  and  as there is a lack of reliable secondary sources for Jon listed in the article. The references provided either do not have him as the subject http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/fa_cup/7704913.stm 1 or are unreliable http://www.kentishfootball.co.uk/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2525&Itemid=38 2. Arguments such as page view statistics, he deserves it and users trying hard are redundant as per Wikipedia policy. The discussion is to determine whether he is notable for this encyclopedia, and the moment, he is not. If he passes the notablity stage in the future, the article can be recreated in it's current state, saving all the current work that has gone into it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:FOOTYN||WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: The Delete voters particularly mentioning about something that may be true. But it is not even mentioned in  & . There is no concrete regulations that supports their state. There is nothing that the DELETE voters have mentioned is in the regulation itself, it is kind of BIAS to delete this article by neglecting the rules. The FACT is, the article already passes  given the current rules for , the decision must be made according to the rules. How can we say that the references given is not reliable & how far the reliability is, can someone give me a concrete measurement ? Is there any very concrete reason to say that the references is not reliable ? What is the meaning of the "no notability" words mentioned by Angelo in his vote ? There are thousands of so called pro league ppl bio is in Wikipedia itself that only have a sentence or two in the article, some has remained in Wikipedia for three to four years with only one edits or two. Why is that kind of article is still in Wikipedia if people won't search for it ?? Their daily page hits is only 1 or 2 per day, is it worth it to be in Wikipedia, only for a simple reason, ohh he plays in the pro-league and he passes  & so on. Wikipedia SHOULD be a place where there is articles that people will look for, like "Jon Main", not only because it passes  and other guidelines. I agree that the guidelines is important to show that the article is reliable but the people's wants and demand should stand in the first place. I do agree to some of the arguments, I know that this article means nothing to "you", or maybe "us". But do you know the value and the importance of this article to the people out there? Everyday people were searching and searching for Jon Main article, but they couldn't find one because articles & news about him is being deleted over and over again. It is some kind of "UNDERESTIMATION" to the non-league footballers & amateurs, whatever they do, it is not even recognized by the media, even if he/she has won many honours and broken so many records. Can we all, as Wikipedians '''Keep''' this article as a show of thankfulness to him, we didn't give him any money or anything, but we can give him a place in "Wikipedia" that he can be proud of. Not only for him, but also to the non-league footballers in all around the world, to the people that lives in Greater London and also to the AFC Wimbledon and Wimbledon FC supporters. I know that Jon Main is a small fish that lives in a small pond (that's what ClubOranje mentioned), but to me Jon Main is a small fish that is not given enough water and food, only because the fish is small and ppl look at it as useless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE||WP:N||WP:N)