Deletion of Lloyd Monserratt (2nd nomination)

Comment: while never an elected official, his longstanding activism and |ongoing coverage make him notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: With the additional sources now cited, via Newspapers.com, Monserratt's national influence in the Latino community at the time is made clearer. I believe that the article therefore meets |GNG, albeit not |NPOL. More work is needed for a GA, however. It would be useful to caption the infobox photo with the year it was taken, btw. Of course, one of the challenges in sustaining a 15-yr old article is that some sources no longer appear in web searches, even after trying the wayback machine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: This is a really hard case for a notability determination and feels like  on its face. There's coverage of his death because he was chief-of-staff for a councilmember during his unfortunate passing, but the best article is an LA Times article lamenting the fact a library branch was named after him. That being said I could make a good case to !vote keep on some of the obituaries, but I don't think he's notable enough - just demonstrating how grey this one is. I think what makes this so strange is that he would be clearly non-notable had he not passed away
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)