Deletion of Data Design Interactive (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails , per Hellknowz, HighKing, Lordtobi, et al
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: And to put my formal vote for th subject failing . "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", you say? Then let's analyze each reference put here (going numerically from Cunard to Catfish Jim ones
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: as a non-notable video game developer/publisher failing  with no multiple reliable independent ''in-depth'' sources, such as /RS. The sources provided are not in-depth, except perhaps AWM which would barely scrape the margin. They are reliable sources to provide supplementary information, but they are not sufficient for GNG purposes and the subject is not the central or primary topic of the articles. Coverage in https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22Data+Design+Interactive%22&and%5B%5D=collection%3A%22gamemagazines%22&sin=TXT contemporary magazines seems unlikely. Does not meet  and having developed notable video games is . I agree with Lordtobi's summary of the sources above. (My original !vote was "keep", but the guidelines were more lax in 2010 and my argument wasn't really based on GNG anyway.) —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:VG||WP:NCORP||WP:NOTINHERITED)