Deletion of Wikimedia language code

Comment: Even if there would be no 'independent' sources - a lack of that is not a proof that it is not notable. Primary sources can be sufficient. '''''': ''An exception is allowed when Wikipedia is being discussed in the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:CIRCULAR)

Comment: or alternatively '''move''' to roject namespace if deemed useful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: because while I personally find it interesting, not every aspect of Wikipedia/Wikimedia is itself |notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Really more of a WP OTHOWTO|how-to guide than anything notable enough to be of value to those outside the project space, and the lack of coverage in independent sources is a reflection of that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: Not notable for article space per  (its sources, such as documentation, are not independent of Wikipedia); see also . The large table also violates  because it has several unsourced judgements as to what would be "correct". I would not mind if this were moved to the Wikipedia namespace as an info page or essay of sorts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SELF||WP:OR)