Deletion of Harold E. Lurier

Comment: I'm quite surprised that this AfD is starting to turn toward "keep". I'll do an in-depth analyzation of this article compared to the individual criteria in : (1) The possibility that Lurier meets this criteria is ''very'' slim. Even if researchers of the Chronicle of the Morea do cite his work, the page states (in italics) that the field in question must be a broad field, and not a narrow one. The study of an individual chronicle seems to be quite narrow. Secondly, his award for teaching excellence appears to be an internal university award, which is expressly specified as not satisfying the criteria. Therefore, I do not believe that the subject satisfies this criteria; (2) No. If he had, it should be very easy to discover. (3) No. (4) The only books he has authored seem to be ''A History of the Religions of the World'' and ''The Emergence of the Western World'', and they don't appear to be particularly significant in any way. (5) I couldn't find any information that would suggest this. (6) No. (7) No. (8) No. (9) He seems to have merely ''translated'' poetry, not written it. '''Conclusion''': It seems here that the subject of this article fails all nine of these criteria, therefore failing the guideline itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He does appear to have produced a good amount of work, but that itself does not confer notability. I could not find any evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, as required by . He also does not appear to satisfy any of the criteria listed on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)