Deletion of Crystal of Ultimate Vision

Comment: Fails , , , and .  A reason these fan pages keep getting deleted is that they appear to be written from someone's personal memory of the topic.  There might be something that we are overlooking. For example, look at today's featured article, The Adventures of Tintin. It became a featured article, even though it links to the troubled article Secondary characters and settings in The Adventures of Tintin.  Is there some special Wikipedia rule for fan pages?  I don't know of any so I believe that delete is appropriate here.  It's unfortunate that many of these fan pages have to be deleted.  There probably is valid, factual information in the article that would permit the article to survive AfD if an editor did the leg work and provided footnotes. Keeping these troubled fan pages and giving featured article status to articles that link to these troubled fan pages only encourages more problem pages, results in more AfD work, and creates more disappointed editors whose hard work continues to be deleted because it is allow to exists and grow in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:FICTION||WP:NOT||WP:NOR)

Comment: as a fan-fiction, or something. Anyway, violates  and |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)