Deletion of Cyclical time

Comment: as prod nominator. As far as I can tell, it goes to great length to argue that time is cyclical by invoking various famed physicists. Fails  and the real physics touched by this article is covered elsewhere (see my comment below).  '''Cleanup'''. The added references support keeping, there appears to be a real concept somewhere in there. However, the article is of very poor quality, but that is not in itself a reason for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Note that crankpottery is not a valid reason for deletion (there are many forms of notable crankpottery), however, this runs massively into 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as , also possibly erify
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Even with references, the article is an attempt to synthesize a number of very differing viewpoints, and does qualify as |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)