Deletion of Aryan Liberation Front

Comment: How could this sit for 7 days without being G10'd? This falls squarely within #G10 as a negative article on an organisation (and named persons) that is entirely unsourced. Perhaps a properly sourced article can be constructed (no doubt highly negative) about the subject. That would be fine. But unsourced attacks on all persons and organisations must be treated the same. That this is about a claimed white supremacist group makes the application of G10 no different
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Per . Google Book search shows some brief mentions. See http://books.google.com/books?id=9Ljhn2R_YF8C&pg=PA8&dq=%22Aryan+Liberation+Front%22&lr=&as_brr=0&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22Aryan%20Liberation%20Front%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=9ycdj3kGVzMC&pg=PA350&dq=%22Aryan+Liberation+Front%22&lr=&as_brr=0&cd=2#v=onepage&q=%22Aryan%20Liberation%20Front%22&f=false.  Seems deletable as a one time news story. Is there evidence the "group" was ever more than one angry teenager? http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SB&p_theme=sb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB0DA7B86A08F2E&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM says the "group" was unheard of before one 17 year old committed some hate-inspired firebombings. Seehttp://news.google.com/newspapers?id=mccPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=_IwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6359,2340491&dq=aryan-liberation-front&hl=en, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=6pQzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=UTIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=7004,2047195&dq=aryan-liberation-front&hl=en
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)