Deletion of Player versus player in World of Warcraft

Comment: no evidence of independent notability. Smacks of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per #GUIDE. The article meets  for having being covered in a non trivial way in independent reliable sources; the IGN articles have "PvP in World of Warcraft" as a primary topic. However, the coverage in these articles is too small for an article of its own - it could be treated in the PvP subsection of the Gameplay section in the main WoW article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: On the heels of the RuneScape AfD sequence, and on the still-warm corpse of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Player versus player in World of Warcraft/Archive 1|original AfD comes another group of nominations from an editor who has five minor edits a month prior to these noms. I make no apologies for sounding cynical, however, I am still getting that feeling that someone is still |trying to make a point. I guess I'd feel a little more confident in this whole series of AfDs if they were nominated by an editor who has a little bit more of an active history. |I do disclose a conflict-of-interest, as I am a contributor to several of these
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:COI)