Deletion of USS Enterprise (BLDG 7115)

Comment: At issue here is verifiability.  The importance of the article is irrelevant.  My father was navy, and served at Great Lakes, and I would rank the importance of this article ahead of about 1.2 million of the current articles here.  However, in the absence of independent , there is no article.   is never grounds for keeping any article.  If the article is to be saved, reliable sources must be added
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: No sources to prove this is notable per 's definition of "Notability, much less even true. The USN generally only has one ship bearing a particular name, and {{USS|Enterprise|CVN-65}} is still in commission. Hard to understand that they would "commission" a building as a "ship" while an actual ship with the same name is still in commission! Smells of a hoax, or at least a compelete misunderstanding of what a USN ship commision actually is. As written, the article seems to describe a training establishment meant to simulate the organization of a ship, and that its "commissioning" is for that purpose only, not an actual ship commisioning. With no sources, the article is not Verifiable per WP policy, and the creator and his advocate have shown no effort to add reliable sources at all to this point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)