Deletion of Nikki Catsouras (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . Article could avoid that if renamed "Nikki Catsouras fatal crash incident" or something, but would still fail #NEWS: an unfortunate accident, distasteful behaviour in the aftermath, a short-term sensation, ''but'' no legal liability, no changes in the law - it cannot be argued that there is any "historical notability" about this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NOT)

Comment: article is certainly vastly better, and I have thought hard about whether to change my "delete" !vote above; but I still feel this fails #NEWS. Sensational, disturbing, shows how badly people behave, yes; but historically notable? No. (And it's not our business to compensate for the excesses of Encyclopedia Dramatica
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The Catsouras case, like the Dnepropetrovsk maniacs, leads to important issues of ethics on the Internet. Nikki's parents accepted long ago that they will never eradicate all of the photos, although they have had some limited success. When people do a Google search on "''Nikki Catsouras''", it is better for them to find something |reliably sourced at Wikipedia than the article at Encyclopedia Dramatica, which is tasteless and contains the uncensored photos. Rather than arguing about issues like , we should be looking at ways of covering the case that are within Wikipedia guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ONEVENT)