Deletion of Beryllium chlorate

Comment: While we can have articles about substances that haven't been synthesized, we need to have ''something'' to say about them — |significant coverage, even if only speculative. For example, unbiunium is conjectured to lie within the island of stability, and there's plenty to say about it despite the fact that no laboratory has managed to produce it. That doesn't appear to be the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The nomination attacks myself and the good-faith creator but fails to provide a reason to delete.  The prod was feeble too – the difficulty of making the compound is not a reason to delete – see unobtainium.  Apart from what's in the article, the source cited by CommanderWaterford – ''Encyclopedia of the Alkaline Earth Compounds'' – is the clincher.  This is easy to find – I did so when deprodding.  The failure of the nominators to mention this demonstrates that  was not followed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry, topics about chemical compounds must meet the |general notability guideline to be included in Wikipedia, but this one appears to not meet the criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)