Deletion of Shinobu Akiyama

Comment: I don't have any preference on merge, redirect, or creating a list somewhere, but I'm just not finding significant secondary coverage of this person, which is what ultimately matters. Describing nine new species isn't exactly high either, but I don't like editors using publication/"works" counts arbitrarily to assess notability either. If we're concerned about redlinks in other articles, helping with searches, etc., I feel like that's getting into  territory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:ISNOT)

Comment: May not meet , but there are many articles on taxonomists that may not meet those criteria. Taxonomists are usually linked from the species they describe, deleting taxonomist articles will result in red links
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)