Deletion of Veljko Milković (2nd nomination)

Comment: Probable bad faith nom - nominator appears to be on a  making deleion campaign of some kind
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Things stated in above are simply wrong. This guy did receive notice "outside of his own little parochial community" and passes criteria of . The independent sources used in his article are fully valid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: While taking a more detailed look at the material Nikola attempted to reintroduce into the article (mostly ), I found this gem: http://www.dnevnik.co.yu/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3833 this source (Google translation http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dnevnik.co.yu%2Fmodules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D3833&sl=sr&tl=en&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 here) states that Milković is famous ''because Wikipedia says so''. Well, if it's in Wikipedia, it ''must be true'', mustn't it? ;D
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB)

Comment: in the absence of the |reliably published third-party sources about Milković that would allow him to pass WP:BIO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)