Deletion of Vix Lowthion

Comment: Doesn't meet the . There's still a lack of significant coverage. Some of what's used in the page contributes towards significant coverage, but it's not there yet. There may be a lot of routine election coverage coming up, which won't be useful for establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: just repeating here (as creator of the article) my rationale for this article from its talk page.  I agree that Lowthion doesn't meet the notability criteria for politicians (). But I do think she meets the |general notability criteria. She has received numerous, non-trivial mentions in a range of reliable secondary sources. While the sources most often cited in this article are local news, non-trivial coverage includes national newspapers (in particular ''The Guardian'') and the international ''Business Insider''(which carried a long piece on her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Subject in question has not (yet) been elected to any notable position of government
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation after election day if she wins. Neither being a local parish councillor nor being a candidate in a national election the person has not won constitutes a reason why a person gets into Wikipedia: local councils are not an "inherently" notable office at all, and even at the Westminster level a person has to ''win'' the election and thereby ''hold'' a seat as an MP to get over NPOL #1. But the sourcing here is a mix of  local coverage, of a type and volume that ''every'' local councillor on ''every'' local council can ''always'' show, and/or glancing namechecks of her existence in sources that are fundamentally about other subjects besides her, and that's not what we require to consider her notable enough. Obviously this will be recreated very shortly after election day if she wins, but nothing here is already enough to earn her a place in Wikipedia today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: While there could be more (and probably will be more in the future), I see  being fulfilled by a reference mix from publishers like BBC, Guardian, Independent, Daily Telegraph, Business Insider, Times, etc. over a span of four years already. Adding to her notability, there were also several long talk shows on BBC and at least one article (by Julian Clegg, BBC) prominently featuring her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . We have not recently kept an article on a party official for a minor party. A few years ago |consensus changed not to keep party leaders of the Greens and other such marginal parties, as being |too run of the mill. Please correct me if my view is wrong, but she appears to be the leader only on the Isle of Wight, not nationally. There's discussion above that GNG should trump the more specific rules
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:CCC||WP:MILL)