Deletion of Sablé-sur-Sarthe hostage crisis

Comment: because the event itself is non-notable per .  It has no enduring historical significance.  In that, I agree with Noleander.  However, I disagree that it is the lack of English language sources that is the problem here.  After all, this is the online English language encyclopedia of the entire world.  It is not the online encyclopedia of the English speaking world.  This is a critical distinction.  We ought to strive to cover everything notable, no matter the language spoken by the participants or the reporters or the authors of reliable sources describing the topic.  English language sources are preferred when a range of sources are available.  However, when sources are limited but solid, sources in any language are acceptable.  This, in my opinion, is a bedrock principle of this encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: News blip fails . Intense news coverage in anticipation of another Dunblane massacre, then after two days... nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: nbsp; None of the three arguments to delete consider  alternatives.&nbsp; Questions about 1EVENT have no standing if this material is part of an article about the secondary school.&nbsp; We have enough material from the BBC news story to make an article about the secondary school.&nbsp; We would just need to rename the article, add a hatnote to the existing Colbert de Torcy article, and add the lede
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)