Deletion of Lists of 100 best books

Comment: The list is certainly . However it may fulfill the purposes outlined in  {{tq|Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability.}} a list of lists of "best" books is notable however I wonder how a book makes it on the individual lists - I did not check them individually
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:LISTN)

Comment: per nominator. Setting criteria for such an article is necessary (per ), but not attempted and probably impossible for an article with this title. An article on ''List of books considered the best'' (an article entitled ''List of books considered the worst'' already exists) may fare better as a premise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LSC)