Deletion of Masayoshi Yamaguchi

Comment: I have in the past and today again removed multiple vanity scam "awards" from this article, from the International Biographical Centre, http://news.scotsman.com/geraldwarner/Degrees-of-vanity-honour-the.3291534.jp United Cultural Convention, etc. I am not convinced of the reality of the remaining listed awards. He may well pass #C1 but I think the article should be stripped down to only the parts that can be adequately sourced. I don't know j-global (the only source currently listed); is it itself something that publishes information with some sort of editorial control, or is it just a news scraper
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Subject appears to have a GS h index of around 40, comparable to those of some Nobel Prize winners and giving a clear pass of rof#C1. Please will the nominator explain why he did not take this matter into account
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per the very high number of citations of his papers and publications (Citation counts per http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Masayoshi+Yamaguchi%22 this page on Google Scholar): http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006295287904710 216 citations,  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006295286902455 129 citations,  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001457939380998A 127 citations,  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001457939280884J 103 citations,  https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00925738 100 citations,  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024320599006025 96 citations,  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006295297004024 91 citations,  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-670X(1998)11:2/3%3C119::AID-JTRA5%3E3.0.CO;2-3/abstract 76 citations,  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006295299001628 82 citations, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006295294901600 87 citations, and so on). He very clearly has "made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." (rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)