Deletion of Workers Party of Britain

Comment: to George Galloway#Other developments (2015–19). The party lacks the significant coverage in reliable sources required to meet  and . In the absence of those sources there's no basis to write an encyclopaedia article rather than |a summary of a few news stories. Nonetheless, it's plausible that a better claim for notability might be made in the coming months or years, and it's not unreasonable to expect that some people will be looking for information about it on Wikipedia. As such, preserving the search term and the history is likely to be useful. (I don't think, however, that much if anything needs to be merged – the two sentences in the Galloway article are sufficient for now.) &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:NOTNEWS)