Deletion of Murder of Tim Bosma

Comment: As I already noted, there were legitimate  reasons why the article ''had'' to be deleted in 2013 — however, now that Millard and Smich have actually been ''convicted'', PERP no longer applies and this now needs to be judged on its own merits rather than being speedied as a recreation of the 2013 version. That said, as things stand right now this fails on the merits: it's an inadequately sourced two-sentence stub, which fails to demonstrate any enduring notability besides "thing that happened". It ''might'' be ''possible'' to write a ''good'' article which was sourced and substanced well enough to demonstrate notability properly — but ''this'' article, in ''this'' form, ain't it. The test that distinguishes murders that qualify for Wikipedia articles from murders that don't qualify for Wikipedia articles is not the mere existence of coverage, as all murders always get media coverage but ''we'' are  — rather, it's whether you can demonstrate a substantive reason why people will ''still'' need to read an article about it |ten years from now. (Matthew Shepard, for example, is ''still'' talked about and analyzed almost ''twenty'' years after his death — while thousands of other murders that have happened over the years are ''not''.) But nothing here demonstrates that this passes that hurdle. And I'm also concerned about the creator's username so closely resembling the murder victim's name — implying a |vested interest of some kind. So this has to be deleted in this form, although without prejudice against a ''good'', ''substantive'' and ''properly sourced'' article about it being created in the future if somebody can do ''better'' than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YT||WP:COI)

Comment: per {{u|Bearcat}}.  This is .  Sure, there is some media coverage, but there is almost always going to be routine media coverage of murders.  I don't see evidence that there is media coverage above and beyond routine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Article needs improvement, but this is a high-profile murder that has garnered major media coverage across Canada for now over 3 years.  Nothing "routine" about it.  Passes   by dint of in-depth, ongoing, national coverage in major Canadian media https://www.google.com/#q=%22Tim+bosma%22&tbm=nws
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is terrible, but the subject matter meets . If the consesnus is the delete, we should consider moving it to draftspace or userspace
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: For me it is a mystery how the first AfD could end with a delete decision.", no mystery there, deleted because 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)