Deletion of Kirsten Gillibrand

Comment: per , unsuccessful political candidate. Also note that there a few editors (mostly Annonymous1000 Jenikap) have recently created large amounts of democratic related articles. Could this possibly be liberal propaganda on Wikipedia? If so, then the above article also falls under #Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT)

Comment: It's  may need some work (''"energetic moderate-to-liberal Democrat with broad bi-partisan appeal,"'' is just a start), but as a poorly qualified amateur historian, I personally think this is one of those things that should be kept. If she loses, ten years from now (Web 5.0?) somebody else will have won and the competitor would be a red article because nobody knows who she was
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: fails . Also, "presumptive" candidate? Sounds like crystal-ballism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)