Deletion of South African wireless user groups

Comment: As said, given the sources available, the article does still not meet ,  requires ''significant'' sources.  Three sources is not significant.  Most(aside from the three) do not meet the requirements posted for sources at .  If wireless groups in SA were truly notable, there should be many more sources that are independent from the subject listed, however, there are not.  It's a given that a publication about telecommunications is going to write about a wireless group, hence why the source must be independent from the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: Only about three of those citations meet , please read the aforementioned policy, just because an article has a lot of citations, does not make it notable, you must make sure that each citation meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: These groups are not notable individually, but I see no reason not to have an aggregate article on the movement/sub-culture/whatever, even if it is too fringe for significant secondary coverage.  is a tool, not a law of nature; in this case common sense should override it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)