Deletion of Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions

Comment: per  and . This article is by all rights a mere extension of what's already covered in List of Jeopardy! tournaments and events#Tournament of Champions|this section. Furthermore, 80% of the article is made up of just lists of mostly non-notable people which makes the article even cruftier. The subject of this AFD is in its entirety just a bunch of fancruft that has no business being an encyclopedia article. There's absolutely nothing in this article that's stated that's anymore noteworthy than if a local news station reported "Hey, someone from Paducah appeared on Wheel of Fortune". The AFD wolves target pages like these for a reason and that's because pages like these are the ones that tend to get the most out of control as far as getting ballooned with a monstrosity of useless and unnecessary content. The pack of AFD wolves have definitely made their case here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: to List of Jeopardy! tournaments and events#Tournament of Champions per nom.  A simple description of the tournament's format and the typical pool of entrants is sufficient (and this is provided on the intended redirect target).  The rest of the page is a list of contestants who have appeared on the tournament since it began.  This violates  and  as the majority of these contestants are not notable (with some obvious exceptions, such as Ken Jennings, but these contestants have their own articles that include their performances in ''Jeopardy!'' tournaments
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: and improve references for years not recently covered. Given the amount of sourcing we have for this article (which I disagree with the original nominee regarding whether it establishes notability), I think there's not enough sourcing to support most of the article. Whether there is a '''redirect''' or maintenance as a standalone article, a list of the grand champions for each year would be worth keeping, as there's generally been enough independent news coverage of Tournament of Champions events each year to qualify. That's seen in some of the more recent tournaments but could be expanded upon for the earlier ones. Beyond that would likely constitute excessive detail and /
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:FANCRUFT)