Deletion of SALERO

Comment: Several of the Google Scholar sources are prominent ones, including the ''Modern Language Journal'', ''Psicológica'', and two sources published by the Cambridge University Press. So, there is evidence of notability from multiple sources. In addition, the only category-specific argument for non-notability () was based on a misunderstanding. The article can be improved through the sources found, and "if the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion" (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP||WP:DP)

Comment: no independent sources, fails  generally. By the way, "not a lot has been written about it yet" is a long way of saying "non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Per , "simply stating that the subject of an article is not notable does not provide reasoning as to ''why'' the subject may not be notable".  does not apply as SALERO is not a coporation or a non-profit org of any kind (it's a European Union program). The Ghits are mainly to participants at research organisations and professional associations such as IEEE. The program is relatively new so not a lot has been written about it yet. 715 Ghits in total and 39 hits in Google Scholar.http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=salero+semantic&btnG=Search There is at least one scientific article ''about'' the program (W. Haas, G. Thallinger, P. Cano, C. Cullen, and T. Buerger: SALERO: Semantic Audiovisual Entertainment Reusable Objects. ''Proceedings of the first international conference on Semantics And digital Media Technology (SAMT)'', December 6-8, 2006, Athens, Greece.). Also the article was only created 10 hours ago so it's a bit premature to call for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:CORP)

Comment: As has already been pointed out,  does not apply as SALERO is not an entity
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)