Deletion of Basementalism (2nd nomination)

Comment: a university radio show?  The articles linked (local/school papers, subject's own website) don't really constitute  indicating notability. Optionally redirect to the station
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: obviously.  A radio show on a university station?  . And evidently  from the above comments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:COI)

Comment: to KVCU - clearly  - see above - and huge POV problems
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: The article has changed somewhat from the original version.  It now cites some sources (though the citations are not in line), at least one of which can be considered a reliable source which is independant of the article subject.  However, it only cites 3 sources total, and one of them is still the history on the Basementalism website.  I'd like to see more independant sources cited.  I've gone over the article and tried to reduce the |point of view problems, copy-edited it, and wikified it; but it still needs more clean up.  I'm not sure why this AFD's still open; usually they are closed after 5 days and it's now been 8.  The concensus seems to be at this point to |merge the information into the article about the radio station, and if you can't find more sources that are independent of the show and station themselves, then that's what I would recomend doing at this point
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:MERGE)