Deletion of Mass cremations in India

Comment: The online Tribune and Ensaaf links give secondary sourcing, although I'll agree not strong ones. As long as the article keeps a grip on it's interpretation of the primary sources, this passes by  issues of relying on primary sources.  To be honest, there are so many AfDs for articles that never even bother to reference primary sources that this kind of issue is refreshing. I agree with the above editor's suggestion of a retitle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)