Deletion of Software Craftsmanship

Comment: I see a page with sources relating to the article title, though not necessarily its content. The defense seems to be argument by fiat or by anecdote, with most of the defenders admitting to . That's specifically a problem in discussions like this. The problem is that without third party verification, this is a vanity page. - Special:Contributions/68.20.1.120|68.20.1.120
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: to software engineering until this becomes independently notable as a logism. It's not there yet
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)