Deletion of Northern Virginia United FC

Comment: The sources supplied here are either connected, passing mentions, or  coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: the based on the sources found, this nomination feels like a  nomination rather than a legitimate nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: based on sourcing provided, only the Loudoun Times-Mirror approaches |significant coverage, but it feels a little bit too much like routine local sports coverage. The other sources provided are either routine or don't address the subject in detail. Additionally, the team has not played in the U.S. Open Cup, which usually grants a presumption of notability with . Additionally, the article suffers from an out of date roster, which is common for NPSL/USL2 sides and has resulted in a lot of permastubs. I'm leaning delete on this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: The fact that their games are regularly reported on suggests that the team is notable. While it is true that  specifically says individual match reports are routine coverage, that only applies to the notability of ''events'', in this case the individual matches themselves, and not to the larger issue of notability of the teams involved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)