Deletion of Pro-abortion rights violence

Comment: This article suffers most from  and should be deleted on that basis. It is also a non-neutral presentation, despite the revision of the "Background" section.  The POV problem seems not to lie not just in the language used, but in the choice of topic.  Lists, such as this one which pick only one side of an equation, are inherently POV.  Lists unsupported by multiple sources that discuss the topic, not just the individual list entries, are, like this one 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:OR)

Comment: Partisan nature of reliable sourcing is something that  anticipates;  is relevant.  Just because, for example, Catholic News has an opinion on abortion does not make it unreliable.  Most of the above deletion arguments seem to hinge on this misreading of policy.  Note that this area remains under /DS|discretionary sanctions.  I think {{U|E.M.Gregory}} makes a valid point: how much of the argumentation here is based on editors' own strong feelings about abortion?  As the drafting arbitrator for the Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion|2011 case, I can say that the argumentation here seems pretty mild by comparison to what I had to wade through there, but there are echoes of the partisan arguing couched in terms of Wikipedia policies which that case examined. The fact is that there is both pro- and anti-abortion violence throughout the world.  Maybe the right thing to do is to put it all into one big article and lay out the relevant incidents in one article that shows the relative preponderance as covered in RS'es.  Regardless, this is verifiable content on a notable topic, and so the burden on those seeking to delete this from here becomes, "If not in this article, where should this information best be presented in encyclopedic fashion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE||WP:YESPOV||WP:AC)

Comment: the rewrite has addressed a lot of the bias issues with the sources, but does not and cannot address the fact that this is a huge pile of .  A grab-bag of unrelated incidents across different countries does not a cohesive topic make
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)