Deletion of Kigo (Kim Possible)

Comment: as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: this article.I think you all forgot that there is canon subtext in the KP Show(I am sure that you all would watched KP and wouldn't ignore the subtext if you were saying ,huh?) True,this wasn't stated as canon by Disney,but if you watched the show you would find the canon points out even if you aren't interested in Kigo. Everyone still not satisfied? Then read  the Ignore all rules "rule" which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules “rule.” Sincely,Tantrix—The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/82.212.51.32|82.212.51.32
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: fanfic, the end. Invoking  on the basis of the informational merit of silly fanfic authors is ridiculous
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Note that IAR is only applicable in cases where Wikipedia process would get in the way of a very obvious or inevitable decision. This subject, which fails  for notability and where listing most of the subtext for this pairing would be obvious |original research, is clearly unsuitable for Wikipedia and invoking IAR would actually get it deleted, not kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:OR)

Comment: unsourced speculative |original fancruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as fanfiction under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)