Deletion of LetterWise

Comment: Does not satisfy |software notability.  Contains |promotional language
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFTWARE||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Per {{u|Djm-leighpark}} and .  The article is now suitably referenced (as noted above; and on reading it), and still doesn't yet include the citations that a search of books provides (one of which I added just now). A major improvement from where it was at the nomination, and clearly an interesting product that should be  in WP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:PRESERVED)

Comment: The LetterWise article has undergone further improvement over the past few days with additional references added some of which I believe sate  and pragmatically I would now find it hard to believe any lack of notability claim against the article as it now stands would succeed.  I proffer that most promotional claims made in the article have been eliminated, qualified or moderated however my deepening scrutiny suggest some may persist (though they are now not serious in the overall context of the article).  For that reason particularly I am using an ''under construction'' while scrutiny, refinement and improvement of the article continues as a background task.  Thankyou
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Fails  and fails seems like an advertisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)