Deletion of Kilcoo Camp (2nd nomination)

Comment: There is no mention of "Camp Awakening" in the article and it appears the "Camp Awakening" is an entirely separate organization which places the participating boys at Kilcoo and the girls in a different place. As such, this organization fails the criteria for establishing notability, fails  and GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: If we actually had an article about Camp Awakening, then this could be mentioned in and redirected there. But they're not the same thing for the purposes of establishing that ''Camp Kilcoo'' is notable enough for an article — Kilcoo is a camp ''facility'', while Awakening is an ''organization'' that organizes a camping ''event'' held ''at'' Camp Kilcoo. But notability is |not inherited, so the fact that a potentially more notable organization uses Kilcoo as a venue is not a notability freebie that exempts Kilcoo from having to have |reliable source coverage ''about Kilcoo''. This is the same as the reason why the camp facility where I used to do Boy Scouts camp in the summer is not automatically notable enough for a Wikipedia article just because the Boy Scouts themselves are — the ''camp'' isn't itself the ''subject'' of enough reliable source coverage to clear a Wikipedia notability standard, and just because the camp's events ''included'' regional Boy Scout camp week doesn't make them the ''same'' thing as the Boy Scouts themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:RS)