Deletion of Joe Loves Crappy Movies

Comment: per .  "Keep" rationale above is just plain silly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The article itself may need to be amended to show that it does qualify for inclusion under  (As JLF has already demonstrated), but that can be addressed easily.  Just because one person thinks it "not notable"  does not mean it is so.  I see absolutely no reason for deletion and I hope the issue will be resolved soon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Because I don't agree with . Wiki is an encyclopedia, nothing diserves to be left out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per nom. Also, it doesn't matter whether you agree with  or not because it is an official guideline and the criteria for which web based articles have to meet to be considered notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per nom. This is a pretty clear  failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The author's entry was deleted, and this webcomic has fewer than 300 http://www.google.com/search?q=%22joe+loves+crappy+movies%22 unique Ghits. Many of those 275 or so are forum posts, so the comic probably isn't that well-known. It simply fails the  criteria, despite noise to the contrary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: no evidence from  that subject of article meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)

Comment: unverifiable through third-party, non-trivial reliable sources, fails ,  an internet guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT)