Deletion of Impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden

Comment: per  and the vast majority of above delete arguments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Redundant at best with other articles, serious  concerns, and a sufficiently awkward title that it's not a sufficiently plausible search term to be made into a redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per  Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and ontentfork. Efforts to impeach Joe Biden serves to cover relevant material just fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: or '''weak merge''' with Efforts to impeach Joe Biden. So far, the only effort (note: singular), is a meritless accusation by a representative and QAnon conspiracy theorist, and this is going nowhere. Proposed bills that go nowhere usually don't merit articles, and I don't think this is any different. I strongly doubt that giving this nonsense |due weight merits even one article. It most certainly doesn't merit two articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: per , there's no justification for creating controversial BLP-related articles on the basis that something ''may'' come to pass and there ''may'' be future sourcing about it. An impeachment inquiry is not the same as efforts to impeach
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: If this is deleted, then I will begin questioning some integrity markers on Wikipedia.  Second impeachment of Donald Trump started off almost being deleted per .  People did vote to delete it while others voted to keep it. Going to quote from an editor who actually has commented on here: {{ping|SecretName101}} who said "We don't typically wait for a "formal inquiry" to happen before we create an article about impeachment efforts."  Honestly, in the last few months I have seen a lot of hypocrisy happening on Wikipedia.  I know people can change minds, but at the same time, if there is a Efforts to impeach Donald Trump that '''includes information not related to his 2 impeachments''', then an article titles Efforts to impeach Joe Biden that has information that is relevant to that title, then we should keep it.  Wanting to put this for a discussion for editors who !voted delete & also wanting Secretname101's opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and . Until and unless there is substantial movement to impeach Biden that looks ''at least'' to carry a sizeable minority of House and Senate support, and coverage in multiple international sources, we should not have an article on this topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPSOURCES||WP:NPOV)

Comment: As noted above, agree it should just be left in the Efforts to impeach Joe Biden page. It feels very  at this point, it would be worth its own revisiting if it gets to the floor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per , {{U|WMSR}}, ''et al.'' We |are not be in conjecture or forecasting business
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:OR)

Comment: this is a non-notable event. While there may have been some news/RS coverage of these efforts, I believe this is a case of  ({{tq|q=yes|Wikipedia considers the '''enduring notability''' of persons and events}} (emphasis added)) - Wikipedia shouldn't have articles on everything that is newsworthy; there is Wikinews for that. I also oppose a merge on the grounds that I also believe that Efforts to impeach Joe Biden should be deleted (for the same NOTNEWS reasons); but I appreciate that this discussion isn't for that. Some editors above have also argued that because this may become a 'thing' in the future; we should wait or merge; but that would (imo) simply be a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: to Efforts to impeach Joe Biden. We have Efforts to impeach George W. Bush, we have Efforts to impeach Barack Obama, so we can have Efforts to impeach Joe Biden. This article may need to be cut down somewhat to avoid |undue emphasis, but generally we have considered efforts to impeach U.S. presidents as notable. (At one point, the George W. Bush impeachment article, then titled Movement to impeach George W. Bush, was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)|longer than Impeachment of Bill Clinton and the entire biography of Andrew Johnson combined
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: as there is no inquiry currently happening; the subject of the article literally does not exist.  clearly applies here. There should be no redirect or merger either, as all relevant content is already present in Efforts to impeach Joe Biden
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)