Deletion of Mirza Ahmad

Comment: Sources include http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/lawyer-mirza-ahmad-set-to-stand-179457 in-depth here and http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2075026/Council-snoopers-access-900-phone-bills.html quoted here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/birmingham-rejects-plea-to-create-elected-101408 mention here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/council-draws-up-mayor-poll-40249 mention here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/birmingham-city-council-leader-mike-151059 mention here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/birmingham-city-council-web-broadcasts-157685 quoted here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/three-birmingham-city-council-bosses-131388 mention here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/being-bloody-minded-with-our-money-47242 mention here and http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/bore-in-censorship-claim-over-council-38234 quoted here and if one searches using https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mirza+Ahmad%22+site%3Abirminghammail.co.uk&rlz=1CAASUA_enUS604US605&oq=%22Mirza+Ahmad%22+site%3Abirminghammail.co.uk&aqs=chrome..69i57.575j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8 this string there are more quotes and mentions. The BASIC rule says ''|If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability'' so we can combine the numerous one-sentence and one-paragraph references to establish notability. He was a power player in Birmingham government but at the same time, the current article is too long, with unsourced material, but if kept should be trimmed down to only what the references say. At present, the wiki-article is borderline 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SPAM)