Deletion of Bret Weinstein

Comment: all relevant content to The_Evergreen_State_College#2017_protests and '''Redirect'''. The events at Evergreen are ongoing, as is all the drama surrounding Professor Weinstein, which could potentially steer in a direction not directly related to the one event that brought him into the spotlight. So the {{tl|R with possibilities}} tag should definitely stay. But as it stands I have to agree he doesn't meet 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: All notability is concentrated around a single sequence of events, the 2017 protests and their aftermath. The article on the protests is a better place to cover this, since we have nothing interesting to say about his biography or scholarly work. The news stories about him mention a fraternity-whistleblowing incident when he was a college student but that's not enough to save this from 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: fails  (unsurprising, notable biologists rarely teach at minor "non-traditional" colleges; they need labs).  No redirect necessary; the sole even for which he is notable is already covered at The Evergreen State College#2017 protests.  The incident/protests/lawsuit  may become notable enough to be a stand-alone article, as someone said above.  Time will tell.  But Weinstein lacks notability apart from BLP1E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: WP:BLP1E. rof not passed yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: There's more in depth coverage of the event ''and its aftermath'', such that 1E does not apply: http://www.king5.com/news/local/evergreen-professor-says-lawsuit-threat-could-improve-college/462011306, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/evergreen-state-college-another-side_us_598cd293e4b090964295e8fc, http://www.chronline.com/news/former-sheriff-s-office-leader-resigns-from-evergreen-state-college/article_7768cb40-7876-11e7-9cf2-67ab06854add.html.  Weinstein is also the author of various scholarly articles: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513804000820#!, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556502000128, etc., along with various "thanks to" in other papers from peers and students, his dissertation, a patent application, and then there's https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12129-017-9656-2 this, a forthcoming academic commentary on the incident, to which I do not appear to have free access. Overall, the continuing coverage afterwards, combined with his previous RS publications, render this far outside the  realm
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)