Deletion of Peter Ruckman (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article fails every aspect of |notability. After some effort to see if the subject was at all likely to achieve notability, my impression is that it would not. I see no significant coverage in |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: The article meets every aspect of |notability.  Those who believe otherwise are simply unaware of the long-standing controversy that has swirled around this man in fundamentalist circles. The folks who support or denounce Ruckman and his teachings are unlikely to publish in scholarly journals. And the reason why the article hasn't changed much in the last few years is that Ruckman has become less active as he's gotten older. Checking traffic statistics, I notice that "Peter Ruckman" received 2400 hits last month compared with about half that for Bob Jones III, chancellor of Bob Jones University
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)