Deletion of Exploding tree

Comment: Since my !vote, the article has been re-written but I still can't agree that it's not a  violation. No documents published in RS exist on the phenomenon of "exploding trees"; the conclusion that such a thing may exist is only reached by forcing together excerpts from articles that speak about maple syrup, cold temperatures and reports on damage by lightning. I commend Uncle G for trying to rescue the article but, if I'm to be completely honest, I don't feel more informed about "exploding trees" than I did before ever stumbling across this piece of cruft in the first place
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: and pure . Much of this category shouldn't exist. They were mostly written before we had well-developed policies against such original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: Just about anything can explode if hit by lightning. This is a blatant  violation and needs to be deleted lest similar non-encylopedic articles should appear such as Exploding Toyota Camry (with full tank of gas), Exploding above ground metal septic tank or Exploding can of diced tomatoes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as |synthesis. The individual sentences in the article could be appropriate in articles about lightning, forest fires, the sandbox tree, and April Fools' Day. That doesn't mean they should be joined together in one article. If any editor can produce a single reliable source that discusses "exploding trees" ''in general'' as a subject, then let them bring it forward now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)