Deletion of Leif-Eric Easley

Comment: Too junior to have much chance of passing , not described in enough depth in published news articles (as opposed to being quoted or being the author of the articles) to pass , too |larded with irrelevant detail to make any other notability evident, and the sockpuppet party in evidence here isn't helping either. (Isn't it time to take this to  already
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:LARD||WP:SPI)

Comment: No sign of meeting any of the rof criteria. Far too early. The fan-club support does not help the cause of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: he's non-tenured, and I don't see |significant coverage about him, rather than his research.  Has anyone looked in the level of the citations of his work?  If it's good (high h-score), then I could change my mind.  Otherwise, this is |not an article, it's a LinkedIn page or |an electronic resume
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOT||WP:RESUME)

Comment: Ok, I have taken a look at every single reference (whew) in the article as of this revision http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leif-Eric_Easley&oldid=556202701.  About 80-90% of the references are papers, articles, letters, etc, written by Easley, which do next to nothing to establish his notability.  The rest are a mixed bag of passing mentions, minor awards, and short bios on university sites.  There isn't enough on the guy to meet , or even 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: The claims in the wall of text above are beside the point. The link at the top to Google scholar shows cites of 29, 6, 1. By the standards in these pages this is its totally inadequate to pass rof#1 and shows that hardly any notice has been taken yet by others of the subject's work however much he may have produced. Editors should note the statement at rof ''Having published does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are. Notability depends on the impact the work has had on the field of study. This notability guideline specifies criteria for judging the notability of an academic through reliable sources for the impact of their work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P)