Deletion of Short-Fingered Vulgarian

Comment: Silly, but seems to meet . Funilly enough, '''today''' I read about this "concept" on Dagens Nyheter  http://www.dn.se/nyheter/usa-valet/trump-i-hetsig-debatt-med-cruz-och-rubio/and saw a sketch that mentioned it on yesterdays SNL
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic is name calling with Graydon Carter is the perpetrator, Trump the victim.  says in part: ''Wikipedia editors must not act, intentionally or otherwise, in a way that amounts to participating in or prolonging the victimization
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:AVOIDVICTIM)

Comment: Of course, this is rather silly, but perhaps the mention can be merged to an appropriate article, as per  relative to the decent coverage the topic has received
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: There are plenty of sources discussing this, which satisfies . As long as the article doesn't focus unduly on the current news, it's not a recentism issue. For a similar case, see "Confessions of a Republican", an old topic which has also been brought up in reference to Trump's current campaign
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per .  Merge with NO redirect if really needed to keep any of this content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Per QuackGuru, we should migrate one sentence over, with a reference, then delete the article under this title per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)