Deletion of Pat Zalewski (2nd nomination)

Comment: this as an open-and-shut case of failing  and  and , with no  to make this person notable as anything.  And furthermore, I would like to point out to the closing admin, as well as to the entire community, that the meat-puppetry violations of  that have gone on during this AfD are a hideous stain on the integrity of Wikipedia's policies and processes.  For that reason, the cynically manipulative comments and keep votes of the meat puppets in this discussion should be entirely ignored
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:CANVASS)

Comment: The previous AFD was not helpful in shedding any light as to why it would have so many keeps despite  the lack of reliable sources. Considering that  has become more rigid since then, and despite his large body of work, there has been no real substantiated assertion of notability. As such, I'm inclined side with delete unless someone is able to track down multiple reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: while Zalewski is mentioned a handful of times in bibliographies and the like, there is no substantial third-party coverage on the person themselves.  I do not believe he meets  at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)