Deletion of Berkery, Noyes & Co

Comment: I believe this fails the notability guidelines, and specifically lacks significant, reliable coverage in secondary sources. Had a look through  and just can't see how this article's refs meet the guidelines. Went through most of the references. Many are a long way from secondary, and most do not deal with the subject of the WP-article directly. Most refs are about their clients, not Berkery themselves (most mention ''Berkery, Noyes'' in passing); For example http://www.criticasmagazine.com/lj/home/890931-264/beyond_synergy_a_market_trend.html.csp 1, http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/publisher_modern_luxury_looking_jx7VjgCMcRwMgfdkGD9YYN 2, http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2006/04/05/reed-elsevier-puts-educational-library-on-the-block/ 3, http://www.prweek.com/uk/news/139703/Refocus-leads-sale-Thomson-Financial-IR-arm/?DCMP=ILC-SEARCH 4. The article itself is very badly written, and reads like a promotional piece - for example "Berkery Noyes has played a role in the consolidation of the publishing sector by facilitating the growth of large companies such as Reed Elsevier, McGraw-Hill, and The Thomson Corporation". I believe Jansen Noyes, Jr. himself may be notable, but this company is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)