Deletion of The Pixar Universe

Comment: nominating something that was created to address concerns in a concurrent AFD really is a bit |pointy. It seems fairly obvious that while the concept might be notable (having received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources), the content of the article is a work-in-progress (that progress being an ongoing discussion elsewhere as to what should be included in this article). Nominating it 23 minutes after creation is just silly. The author has spent days pre-empting its creation by drawing attention to his user-space draft during which time you could easily have raised concerns. In fact, he raised it with you on your talk page and you didn't respond
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per Kitfoxxe and . Critical commentary about the worlds created by a single author or company are common (see Styles and themes of Hayao Miyazaki, Roles of mothers in Disney media, {{Lookfrom|Themes in}}). The article needs not be about a the idea of shared univere only; there are enough sources for a viable topic expanding on all reviews about themes found in Pixar works. The exact nature of the coverage included in the topic is open to editorial discretion, that should be dealt with at the article's talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think notability is plainly established by sourcing, and it skirts being |original research (perhaps barely). I caution anyone commenting on this against confusing this article with The Pixar Theory, which is a far more specific sub-topic of this overarching topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per above: clearly meets , and it's obviously a work in progress, having just been started yesterday in response to the other AfD and moved to mainspace an hour ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm going to  and assume the nomination was misguided, not pointy; but this article was AfDed 23 minutes after creation, and the topic appears to pass /. Psychonaut's failure to discuss the merits of this article, despite being given several chances to do so, is concerning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:N||WP:GNG)