Deletion of Emma Tillman

Comment: WP:OUTCOMES|longtime consensus here allows us to keep the articles of the oldest person.  |I don't see a major change
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: Mrs. Tillman received media coverage from at least the age of 110 up to her death at age 114+, thus spanning more than four years, in a variety of sources (nwespapers, video reports, and internet articles, among others); earlier in this thread, David in DC identified/defined |Notability as "having significant coverage in multiple, |reliable sources, independent of one another and of the subject". In my mind, Mrs. Tillman's media coverage is a perfect example of that definition, and as a result she would qualify for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: One single event (briefly being the oldest person) does not make somebody notable. In addition, EEng hits the nail on its head with : there's simply nothing encyclopedic to say about this person's life. At best, she should be included in an appropriate list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: I fail to see how  applies here. There isn't a "tiny" amount of information here and each world's oldest person is an individual in a historical chain. You mean that  allows extremely minor sportspeople articles which are just a sentence or two long, but not this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:GNG)

Comment: There is much information here and the article could preferably be expanded instead, if some people believe that it is too short. And the whole  nomination is proved inaccurate, given the content of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is NOT a valid argument. Furthermore, Augustine Tessier was not thought to be the world's oldest person when she was alive, because Shigechiyo Izumi was thought to be the W.O.P. She is only recognised retrospectively because Izumi's claim has since been found to be fraudulent. So, it's not a fair comparison. Your reasoning doesn't make sense: Tessier is not notable because of a lack of sources, but when faced with someone who is covered by sources, they're not notable because another W.O.P wasn't notable. Sorry, but if you want to determine whether someone meets  by looking at the sources, then this person does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Likely notable but . "Tillman ran her own baking and catering service whose regular customers included Dr. Thomas Hepburn, a noted Hartford Hospital urologist and father to actress Katharine Hepburn"{{mdashb}}worthless padding
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)