Deletion of Gentlemen of the College, The

Comment: although it is a close call. Sadly all the sources cited are exactly the kind that the |guidelines suggest are '''not''' valid - ie minor listings or college newspaper entries. If only a major source had reported their performances for the President or the Queen! However in the absence of these sources, it does not strictly meet the guideline for |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:N)

Comment: Only the most elite college singing groups such as the Whiffenpoofs and Krokodilios pass  and rate an article. Every college has singing groups
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: After reviewing the |guidelines for deletion, it states that if any one of the 10 criteria listed are met, that the article's subject should be considered valid.  One of these includes musical competitions.  ICCA is the largest collegiate a cappella competition in the country, and thus the group's strong placement in previous years, even if it no longer competes, should be considered evidence for validation.  Furthermore, I've seen a few articles on similar groups that have zero substantianting claims to notoriety and quality which have not been deleted.  Also, one of the sources describing their performances is the Washington Post, hardly an unreliable source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: due to lack of evidence that they satisfy . This group is not the oldest a cappella group at their college, just the oldest all-male one; there is an older coed a cappella group. http://flathat.wm.edu/2003-10-17/story.php?type=3&aid=6 Also, most of the awards they won are things like regional semi-final championships, as opposed to national awards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)