Deletion of Miss Multiverse (2nd nomination)

Comment: Can you '''prove''' that no Wikipedia administrator has pageant experience? Can you tell me what experience I have? I don't think so. Don't think that we put everything about ourselves onto our user pages. Anyway, what has experience in pageants got to do with assessing something to see if it has sufficient reliable independent coverage. All coverage I found on Google fitted into 13 pages of 10 hits for "Miss Multiverse" (and that's not a lot Googlewise) - and at least one was about a sculpture called 'Multiverse' which one was being advised not to 'miss'. The rest appeared to be not  compliant. The Missology link you give is a promotional piece, and a very large part of the ghits seemed to be promo too. By the way, articles are '''not''' approved by administrators. An admin might give an opinion that he or she thinks an article is ready to launch, or that it doesn't fail a certain criterion, or so on. We do not put a stamp on an article saying that it is officially approved on behalf of Wikipedia as a whole and may not be challenged or deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Salting is reasonable given the history of this article, with numerous deletions and recreations. I added a reference; still the references overall do not seem to meet the GNG but I am willing to switch if more references are found. Applicable rules are , , etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS)