Deletion of City17: Episode 1

Comment: Lacks the multiple, in-depth and |reliable sources needed to establish |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: This article is too early. It needs |reliable third party sources in order to prove that the mod is notable. As it's still in development, this is unlikely. Maybe, per , the mod may become notable after release, in which case the article can be recreated. For now, it should be deleted as per ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SCRABBLE||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: I can't find any |reliable sources to assert |notability.  It should be noted that the only two keep rationales to date are |ILIKEIT and |OTHERSTUFF.  Just because you like it or find it interesting doesn't warrant inclusion in the project, and the fact that other, similar things in the project doesn't mean anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: with no prejudice against recreation when the game's released. It may meet  when it's released, it may not, but the preliminary material is there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Where's the |evidence this mod is notable? I'm not sure one page from ModDB is enough. Unlike MINERVA (mod), there are no third-party independent sources asserting notability. "The mod being released on time" has got to be one of the most random reasons for keeping the article I've ever heard. If you can magic some reliable sources asserting notability from somewhere and use them in the article, I'll change my vote. Until then, gotta be delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)