Deletion of Tauheediyah

Comment: per , especially not if the sources are all primary and/or self-published
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSOAPBOX)

Comment: As is the case with the article about Ansari, the article about his/his followers' website is problematic in a number of ways. Articles about local, obscure South Asian religious movements are common; they tend to be detailed, technically well-written though by non-native speakers of English and illustrated with photos uploaded by the article creator prior to publication. It's a major violation of  that frequently occurs, because these figures and organizations rarely have any coverage outside of self-published sources. That is the case with this organization, which fails  as another good-faith but inappropriate attempt to create buzz using Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:GNG)