Deletion of EPlasty

Comment: I'd say  is allowing it to be kept here, although it is close to the borderline. I also recommend an expansion of the article to show there is enough notable material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALS)

Comment: I'm sorry, but I strongly disagree with the arguments put forward in the last 2 !votes. The !vote by DavidLeighEllis has no basis whatsoever in any policy or guideline. As for the remarks by DGG, I respectfully disagree. The journal is ''not'' boderline. It is not indexed in any selective database. There is not a single |reliable source. As for the argument (also put forward by others above), that being cited in WP shows notability, I couldn't disagree stronger. WP is not and cannot be an indication of notability (if only it's not a ...) Accepting this argument would create a very dangerous precedent. And whether or not the authors who published in this journal are from notable institutions or are notable themselves is immaterial, as |notability is not inherited
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:NOTINHERITED)