Deletion of Shrewsbury Chronicle

Comment: This article is only supported by secondary sources and while it's historical significance means it might meet point 2 of otability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals, ''there are not sufficient sources to verify this notability and the page should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I've added some content and secondary refs. I think the paper meets point 2 of otability (media)#Newspapers, magazines and journals, ''have served some sort of historic purpose or have a significant history''. It could also meet point 1, ''have produced award winning work'', but the source for the award is poor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I am a bit baffled by elements of this debate - particularly the proposer now having tagged Hansard in the article as not a reliable source and better source needed. I also wonder if the proposer carried out . See also the similar debate on the Shropshire Star
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)