Deletion of Loreen Dinwiddie

Comment: As noted above, there is no evidence of meeting 's requirement of non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable, third party sources. Considering that she's really only notable for |one event at this point (becoming the oldest person in Oregon), at most a redirect to List of supercentenarians from the United States#Oldest living American by state might be appropriate, but even that would be somewhat unnecessary in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: As with most articles on supercentenarians the subject's notability rests solely on her age (that is, being merely "really old" and not "the oldest in country xxx" and this has been agreed on '''repeatedly''' as insufficient to justify a stand-alone article. In this case the subject hasn't even reached supercentarian status, let alone been verified (which typically takes 6-12 months, and may not even happen) so keeping the article "in case she makes it" is an extremely poor argument for retention. Additonally the only citations are from youtube which is not considered a . DerbyCountyinNZ
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)