Deletion of Superman (film project)

Comment: The ''Superman'' film series has had a long history of not being able to get films off the ground, even when they had a cast (just look at Superman in film to see for yourself). At this time, I would revert to pointing to  and there is nothing about this "project" that screams it needs its own page as of right now. When they actually start filming and start releasing information about filming, then we can revisit this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: there is enough significant coverage by reliable resources of this topic to support . The article can be maintained in away as not to intrude on the merit of . These are outlined at . The Avengers (film project) and The Hobbit (2012 film) are both examples of former film projects that were successfully maintained in this way and have since transitioned to standard film articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFF||WP:FILMPROJECT)

Comment: per .  GNG does not address the fact that the film has not commenced principal photography and should not have its own article until such time.  The information currently belongs where it is in Superman in film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: This is absurd. Why delete all this information because "It doesn't meet . It meets several other qualities, (, ). Like what editor TriiipleThreat stated, even if the project gets cancelled (highly unlikely now) it still has enough references to maintain a stand alone page. And since this isn't a fully blown film page, it's only wise to make exception for this as we did with ''The Avengers'' and ''The Hobbit
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:GNG||WP:FILMPROJECT)

Comment: The project has plenty of reliable sources to indicate its notability per , even if the film never gets made
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: or '''Redirect/Merge'''(preferrably) I am getting less of a fan of film projects  because of these AFD's . And let's face it they are a sign of desperation of one film to be a article when they are still just fine and comfortable to be a redirection to the film series article. If I was still a fan of these film projects I would have done a long time ago with what Rusted Auto Parts did. But knowing something like this (the AFD I am referring to) would happen made me snub the idea of doing so. I am sure filming is close by and I think we need to learn to be patient with that just a little bit because it's getting old. There's a reason why  was created and if we keep on doing so we might just as well change that rule. And also I am aware of ilm project too because I started it but keep in mind of orm as well. Even though this film seems to qualify on being acceptable on the certain essay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:F||WP:W)

Comment: It would be interesting to see more people address how they feel the  guideline fits into this.  It clearly fails this, but some editors are not making reference to this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)