Deletion of Bridge Elementary School

Comment: Passes the iC|test of a Wikiproject that I have taken to heart
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E)

Comment: As per , notability or the lack thereof is not a valid criterion for the deletion of a school article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: Article constitutes a directory entry.  (It has grown a little during the discussion, but not enough to make it useful content.  When nominated, the content was "Bridge Elementary School is a school in Richmond, British Columbia." plus the template for Richmond, British Columbia.  All that has been added is directory information.)  Per  policy, directory entries are explicitly forbidden; see subsection "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information", item 7 "Directories, directory entries, TV/Radio Guide or a resource for conducting business.".  Additionally, one of the expectations that Wikipedia has of every wikipedia project is that the project help build an encyclopedia, which means helping decide where to draw the boundary line between topics to cover and topics to exclude.  Despite the assertion above that the article passes the iC test, I see no test at that project; the word test doesn't appear on the page and I see nothing else on the page or its current talk page that amounts to a test of material worthy of inclusion.  As to why Phoenix Hacker made so many of these nominations, a single user was mass creating these entries with nothing more than a single line of text.  Mass creation of useless articles leads to multiple deletion discussions.  As explained in the intro to Wikipedia:Notability, it is the opinion of "''some and by evidence at AFD, a large number of editors that this is what is meant by ''Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information'' (which is a formal policy). Many editors also believe that it is fair test of whether a subject has achieved sufficient external notice to ensure that it can be covered from a neutral point of view based on verifiable information from reliable sources, without straying into original research (all of which are formal policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:E)

Comment: since |wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and not a directory of schools. Moreover, eventhough this is not paper, my guess is that the number of schools in the world is so large that there is simply no space to have an interesting non-stub article on all of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)