Deletion of Misogynoir

Comment: ping|Cagepanes}} What grounds do you have for accusing the page creator of being the person who coined the term? The userpage of the creator and the identity of the person listed as coining it seem pretty clearly different. It also looks like you removed a bunch of sources based on being primary or a broken link. Though in your edit summary you say "We do not use first person references", there's not actually a rule prohibiting using primary sources. They're not ideal for most things, acceptable for a few, and don't really contribute to notability, but removing them while nominating seems bad form. Removing a source because the "link does not exist" is, on the other hand, specifically something we don't typically do. I'm not saying any of this was in bad faith (primary sources ''aren't'' good to have and if we shouldn't include  content based solely on primary sources, and I'll add that you were entirely right to remove the Tumblr sources), but it does seem like your edits may be influenced by an impression that this is an article based on self-promotion rather than one written by a student about a topic that interests him/her (speaking of which, I've just notified the user about this discussion). &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: The most common issue with neologisms is that even when there are sources, they aren't sufficiently distinguished from existing concepts we already have articles about (another word for the same thing, or another term that's only slightly different). In this case, I don't see a logical merge target. So, given that there are sufficient sources to pass /, I'd have to say keep. Here are sources about the subject (beyond just use of the term -- and there are many of those out there) - http://music.cbc.ca/blogs/blogpost.aspx?genre=hip-hop&year=2015&month=8&title=Straight-Outta-Compton-roundtable-misogynoir-revisionism-and-Dr-Dres-forgotten-past&permalink=/genres/Hip-Hop/blogs/2015/8/Straight-Outta-Compton-roundtable-misogynoir-revisionism-and-Dr-Dres-forgotten-past CBC, https://www.academia.edu/11737370/_Sisters_in_the_Collective_Struggle_Sounds_of_Silence_and_Reflections_on_the_Unspoken_Assault_on_Black_Females_in_Modern_America journal article published in Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, https://abernathymagazine.com/misogynoir-and-me/ Abernathy Magazine, http://www.papermag.com/2015/08/girl_meets_misogynoir_read_row.php?fb_comment_id=879244298811637_880482765354457 Paper, http://www.theawl.com/2014/08/memes-and-misogynoir The Awl, https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/misogynoiristic-expectancy-social-media-popularity-and-the-black-femme Model View Culture, http://www.gradientlair.com/post/60973580823/general-misogyny-versus-misogynoir Gradient Lair (a blog referenced by http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/04/03/anita-hill-we-can-evolve-but-the-same-questions-are-being-asked/ WaPo and http://www.vice.com/read/revisiting-michele-wallaces-essential-black-feminist-text-black-macho Vice), http://issuu.com/delitfrancais/docs/dail_001_merged Le Delit, http://www.cw.ua.edu/article/2015/04/bennett-to-speak-on-misogynoir The Crimson White, http://www.thevisibilityproject.com/2014/05/27/on-moya-bailey-misogynoir-and-why-both-are-important/ The Visibility Project, http://www.meta-activism.org/2014/04/word-of-the-day-misogynoir/ Meta-Activism, http://groupthink.kinja.com/define-misogynoir-1390091821 Kinja (article-as-definition), http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/08/4-tired-tropes-misogynoir/ Everyday Feminism, http://hoodfeminism.com/2015/07/09/on-mckinney-cosby-and-misogynoir/ Hoodfeminism, http://ourtimepress.com/?p=16910 Our Time Press, http://ewn.co.za/2015/03/16/OPINION-Danielle-Bowler-The-female-body-misogynoir-and-the-myth-of-meritocracy Eyewitness News, http://www.brownboiproject.org/reclaiming_our_masculinity_pushing_back_against_misogynoir Brown Boi Project, http://www.thefrisky.com/2015-07-23/the-soapbox-nicki-minajs-point-about-european-beauty-standards-and-misogynoir-is-not-redundant/ The Frisky... &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEO)

Comment: This is an important thread in black feminism. The article meets  as it has multiple secondary sources that are ''about'' the term and not just using it.  was cited as a rationale for deletion, but this article clearly has reliable sources that demonstrate the material is verifiable. Coiner Moya Bailey elaborates on the term in ''http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10999949.2014.884451#.VejM8rNVK1E Souls: A Critical Journal of Black Politics, Culture, and Society''. Other scholars have offered critical analysis of the term
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NOTESSAY)