Deletion of List of Firefox extensions (2nd nomination)

Comment: It could, but it does not.  As noted by {{User|Rurik}} on Talk:List of Firefox extensions|the talk page: "The eligibility requirements are laid out in the article source. An extension has to have its own dedicated article to be included here. Therefore, it must meet the notability requirements of an article. That keeps the thousands of addons from being listed here."  Thus, it appears to meet .  In response to {{User|Ctjf83}}, the same way we do it with any list article; judging by the edit history, this one has not been any more of a problem than is typical, and perhaps even less.  Disclosure: I have contributed to the nominated article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: There's nothing wrong with limiting lists to notable entries. For example, #Lists of people specifically says that ''selected lists of people should be selected for importance/notability in that category and should have Wikipedia articles (or the reasonable expectation of an article in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)