Deletion of Yun Chol (weightlifter)

Comment: This is the very reason why we have SNGs. This isn't a great article, but we can't actually determine his notability without access to Korean-language sources. I know other users take this to mean "we have to keep the crap," but that's not my point at all - there's simply nobody here who can definitively say if this person is notable or not, and as a content creator that means we need to err on the side of keep as he does pass . If someone does a before search in Korean and nothing comes up, and unfortunately a web search may not suffice, will be happy to change my !vote to a delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Competed at the Olympics, so meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)

Comment: Procedural keep. It appears the nominator wants to challenge . The correct avenue for that is fC; AfD is the wrong way to change the long-standing convention that Olympic participation results in inherent notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY||WP:R)

Comment: per JPL, and per the-philosophical-opposite-of-SF's-position. I agree that {{Tq|there's simply nobody here who can definitively say if this person is notable or not}} but I disagree that {{tq|as a content creator that means we need to err on the side of keep as he does pass WP:V}}. We should err on the side of exclusion because he does ''not'' pass V, unless you count sourced-to-a-statistical-table as passing V. I don't, because in order for something to be verified, it needs to be verified by multiple independent secondary sources. If we only verify something to a primary source, we're relying on . For example, it's original research to say "all Olympians are notable". I'd say {{t|cn}} for that statement. And non-independent sources are not reliable sources for notability determinations. This article subject isn't notable until and unless multiple secondary independent sources say he is. No sources, no article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Competed at the Olympics, so passes the subject specific guideline for this.  See  which some are trying to change now just to eliminate articles for a lot of Olympic contestants
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)

Comment: Screw NOLY. This is spam. Your quantity is not quality. Statistical database entries is not notability. Get some  or this is just 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or redirect or merge as appropriate. The guideline , like other topic-specific notability guidelines, only creates a rebuttable presumption of notability. This presumption can be rebutted if, as here, a thorough discussion does not find any indication of coverage that goes beyond statistical information about match participation. Such information does not amount to a biography in any meaningful sense (see also ). It should therefore be covered in an appropriate list rather than in a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY||WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: Ridiculously |POINT-y nomination, easily passes . Totally inappropriate and should have been speedily closed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:OLY)

Comment: Clear case of , having competed in the Olympics. Possibly a case of not completing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per . You have to get consensus for changing NOLY before asking for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)

Comment: Per . The Olympic Games are the pinnacle event in most sports that are held there, including weightlifting; thus, the competitors belong to the world's best athletes in their field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)

Comment: This could be a procedural keep as a y nom that would be better handled as a general discussion of notability guidelines (as he clearly meets the SNG) but as an athlete about which we have multiple sources about multiple noteworthy performances this isn't even a good test case; he clearly meets the SNG and appears to meet the GNG, even despite the difficulty of accessing North Korean sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Competed at the Olympics, so meets . A y nom following Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User%3AInsertcleverphrasehere|this discussion at ANI
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY||WP:POINT)