Deletion of Fishing Party (Scotland) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Just to comment that if this article should be kept, then surely the recently deleted Scottish Family Party article (which is still a registered party with the Electoral Commission) should have been kept too if there is going to be consistency with smaller political parties on Wikipedia? There is a lot more recent news coverage from reliable sources  about the Scottish Family Party than the Fishing Party. The Scottish Family Party discussion can is available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scottish_Family_Party
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There are 8 sources in the article, each independent, reliable, secondary, and containing significant coverage, except for two. This clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The coverage is sufficient to meet the GNG. I'm a little hesitant that there doesn't appear to be any significant coverage outside the 2003-4 period (there's a trivial mention https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/12097701/Albert-McQuarrie-MP-obituary.html here) which shows a lack of  that I think casts doubt on the suitability of the subject for an encyclopedia article. I would feel more comfortable supporting keeping this article if there was independent RS significant coverage from, say, any time after 2010
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Nothing has changed since the last AFD: with eight independent reliable sources providing significant coverage this clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)