Deletion of 99 Percent Declaration (2nd nomination)

Comment: Thanks for the notice, but I've got a  and have refrained from editing the article ever since it developed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Numerous references online which meet |reliable sources criteria. Also, this article is a bit rough (in need of work). Page views 250+ per day suggest it is an important topic; I realize this is not a formal criteria for inclusion/deletion but it indicates interest in a subject, and suggests notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: pending more reliable sources.  Or can someone point me to a specific source which meets ?  I didn't see any
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 24
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: Nominator claims on article talk page that group has no affiliation to Occupy Wall Street but http://www.nycga.net/groups/the-99-declaration-working-group/ Official Occupy Wall Street Working Group external link which was just removed establishes the affiliation. Nominator also claims that COI editors are directing work from talk page, but that is consistent with our  rules
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: meets  with abundant sources. What happened to all the content? I'm not thrilled with how newbies are being treated. Much sourced content has been removed because it was added by an IP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)