Deletion of Summary of Unconfined Vapour Cloud Explosions

Comment: per Smocking and Ultraexactzz.  Bad |original research can still be a place to find and add references or a bibliography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Hopefully the original author is following this AfD, in which case, I recommend they actually do go and read the |Wikipedia guidelines regarding "Original Research". It's not that the entry is worthless information, it's just not appropriate as an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as prodder. The creator's talk page comment makes his contribution a |secondary source, meaning that it could be used as a basis for an article on Wikipedia as long as it is published ''outside'' Wikipedia first, then deemed |reliable and authoritative. But it cannot be published in Wikipedia as is, given that it is not a |tertiary source about the topic. --'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY)