Deletion of Community development planning

Comment: From a perusal of GBooks and GScholar sources, e.g., https://books.google.com/books?id=HoI6DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22Community+development+planning%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtl8j0wIzbAhUV7mMKHSgGAmoQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=%22Community%20development%20planning%22&f=false The Routledge Handbook of Community Development and https://books.google.com/books?id=qCWryTk5nUYC&pg=PA55&dq=%22Community+development+planning%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtl8j0wIzbAhUV7mMKHSgGAmoQ6AEITTAI#v=onepage&q=%22Community%20development%20planning%22&f=false Development Planning Concepts and Tools for Planners, Managers and Facilitators, community development planning is a real topic with plenty of sourcing to meet notability per . It might refer to the development of communities or, in the sense used in the article and the Routledge book, community stakeholder engagement in the development process. While there is overlap, it doesn't seem synonymous with urban planning, as such projects could be very local or rural in scope. A notable topic that looks different than urban planning suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)