Deletion of Michael Bowman

Comment: using  as a guide, does not appear to be notable. No multiple roles, one major role.  Did receive a arguably notable award nomination. I would, however, argue that the award isn't notable, and he didn't even win it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Honestly, I would tend to agree with the nominator on this one. If the subject has had one prominent role (as opposed to a body of work over time), that role has to be truly notable to justify an article, and I'm not convinced that that is the case here. I would also throw out the |usual caveats - if Mr. Bowman ends up in a notable role or roles in the future, and if sources are presented to document this, then an article might be appropriate. But we're not there yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Usual caveats (WP:USUAL)

Comment: per |TOO SOON. While I think the Blockbuster Entertainment Awards are notable enough for us,  requires "has been nominated for one several times," and with just that one nomination, this person fails. And too, I agree his http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3896725/filmotype singular film role fails . And even if ignoring those SNGs, he fails  and thus 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYA||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)