Deletion of Polyworld

Comment: In a few months if little has been done I'll consider taking this to AfD again as there appears to be  but I'm having an extremely difficult time piecing together whether all the coverage actually makes this a notable piece of software or rather a lengthy mention in another article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I found widespread coverage in probably hundreds of independent academic reliable sources, in English and many other languages. They include peer-reviewed journals, proceedings of papers presented at conferences, graduate theses, etc. I'd suggest following the search steps in  part D before nominating articles, noting that it says the current poor state of an article is improper grounds for a deletion nomination. A few of the several books that discuss Polyworld
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)