Deletion of Kate Heartfield

Comment: There's no solid reliable sourcing being cited here at all. The article is referenced mostly to |primary sources, |blogs, podcasts and content where she's the bylined ''author'' rather than the ''subject'' — and the only two sources that are acceptable for use as Wikipedia references at all (''Tor'' and the ''Ottawa Citizen'') still have problems, because the ''Tor'' piece just namechecks her existence without being ''about'' her, while the ''Citizen'' piece is about her work ''for'' the ''Citizen'' and thus isn't ''independent'' of her. And the article claims ''nothing'' about her that would constitute an automatic free pass over  in the ''absence'' of better sourcing than this, either. A writer is not automatically eligible for a Wikipedia article just because she exists — she has to pass an AUTHOR criterion, and she has to have |reliable source coverage ''about'' her ''for'' it, for an article to become earned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS||WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS)

Comment: She had a successful career in journalism although perhaps not a notable one http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-citizen-editorial-writers-1.3325811 Kate Heartfield, James Gordon leaving Ottawa Citizen; has published short fiction; and has two novels under contract http://artsfile.ca/living-a-writers-life-kate-heartfield-breaks-through, albeit not yet published.  However, writing credits  ≠ WP notability and she lacks .  It looks like a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The artsfile source is the only one there that is also about her, rather than just about her writings. Proving notability would require more biographical media coverage.  With the upcoming books, likely 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)