Deletion of Work aversion (3rd nomination)

Comment: Much of the information in this article is |verifiable, not as synthesis, but exactly as the sources say. I already changed the title back to its old one. It is not a disorder, obviously not in DSM-IV. But that's not what this article is about. It does not cleanup. I agree about that. But I feel there is |no deadline to do that. The previous afd was just closed less than a week ago and I haven't had much time to yet. Regardless, it seems that the nominator here did not see , which requires that an article be cleaned up as opposed to proposed for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:DEADLINE||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There are plenty of sources on the topic, going all the way back to ancient times and up until now. This may not be listed in the DSM, but that is not required by the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Just survived an afd less than a week ago by a 2:1 margin. Improvements have been made since. Nom appears this time appears to be a |single-purpose account for this proposal. Could possibly be a |sock puppet of the previous nom, who happens to be the first to comment here, as the only delete so far
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:SOCK)

Comment: What good content there is on this page is swamped by unsourced, -laden content which does nothing to help the encyclopedia. Complete removal of everything unsourced or dubiously sourced would create a barely passable stub, but the article history shows that this would not be accepted so I have no choice but to support deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)