Deletion of Pothi.com

Comment: sources fail the criteria for establishing notability. Looking at the new references provided above, they are, for the most part, churnalism. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Printing-on-demand-set-to-aid-new-authors-publishers/articleshow/51329814.cms The Times of India reference from 2016 contains no Independent Content and fails  as it relies on information provided by company sources. https://www.thehindu.com/features/magazine/easy-writer/article4150457.ece The Hindu reference from 2012 likewise contains no Independent Content and fails  as the piece about this company relies entirely on information provided by company sources. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/startups-writing-a-new-chapter-in-publishing/article8701628.ece The Hindu Businessline reference fails for the same reason - no Independent Content, all information provided by company sources, fails . https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/books/features/Online-publishing-scores-big-time/articleshow/36958384.cms The next ToI reference fails for the same reasons as the first. https://www.crazyengineers.com/threads/how-jaya-jhas-startup-instascribe-is-helping-users-create-great-ebooks-with-minimal-effort.85213 Finally, this Interview in Crazy Engineers is entirely based on ... an interview with the founder. More churnalism, zero Independent Content, fails ORGIND. Overall, I am unable to locate a single reference that meets the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)