Deletion of Kinfra Apparel Park (2nd nomination)

Comment: I came here as this AfD is listed under company/organization deletions, but this appears to be a business park and not a company. But then I notice that the https://www.kinfraiii.org/ "homepage" links to the KINFRA International Apparel Parks Ltd website. Hmmm ... on the basis that this topic falls under , not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. The https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8qHI_l74dGoC&lpg=PA237 Book Reference relies entirely on information provided by connected sources and therefore is not Independent Content and fails . The references in https://www.financialexpress.com/archive/fresh-facelift-to-kinfra-apparel-park/58269/ Financial Express and https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-economy/Kinfra-Apparel-Park-expansion-nearly-complete/article20223959.ece The Hindu Business Line are based on announcements and rely entirely on quotations/information provided by the company, also failing . If we look at this topic as a place, it fails  for the same reasons - there are no references that contain Independent Content, all of the content has been provided by the company or sources connected with the company. That's marketing and promotion folks! Other articles are mere mentions-in-passing such as reporting on water quality or appointments, these are neither significant nor in-depth. For this park to meet the criteria for notability, then there should exist references written by third-parties containing original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I can't find any. Topic fails GNG/NCORP/NBUILDING
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:NBUILDING)

Comment: This fails  and  by every means. Needs more citations and rewrite
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The present article text is often promotional in tone, boasting of infrastructure links but omitting reported local concerns about water (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/thiruvananthapuram/water-level-at-neyyar-dam-too-plunges/articleshow/58617232.cms Times of India, 2017), and without mentioning controversy about appointments (https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/row-over-appointment-of-psu-heads-in-kerala-3069559/ Indian Express, 2016). However article balance is a matter for clean-up rather than AfD. In the previous AfD, {{u|Phil Bridger}} identified two further news sources (still accessible) plus a book study describing the project's development (in https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8qHI_l74dGoC&lpg=PA237&pg=PA237 "Selling to India's Consumer Market", Quorum Books, 1997). A case study does not in itself confer notability, and I note the  comments, but while I would like to see much more solid sourcing for the article content and do not want to overplay the sporadic coverage which I have identified, I think there is enough overall coverage for |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NBUILD||:WP:GNG)