Deletion of Killing of the night (Book)

Comment: Fails  and , obviously, as vanity press printing.  I strongly urge the creator of the article to review the links found at  to get a handle on how to properly select subjects for article creation and on Wikipedia policies and guidelines; that her first edit was to vandalize a user page was a poor beginning
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOTBOOK||WP:PILLAR)

Comment: Nearly all the articles about books on this site are about books with wp:notability|notability -- published books that third-party sources have written about.  In order for this article to stay, proof is needed that (1) the book exists (2) it has been published and (3) it's been written about or discussed in third-party sources (sources not related to the book's publisher or author).  These are required, and the burden of proof using |verifiable, reliable sources is on the writers of the article -- in other words, I don't have to prove the book isn't notable or that the book doesn't exist, the article's authors and editor need to prove existence and demonstrate notability.  IS ther any way that you can help us out here by providing such evidence
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: No evidence (such as a verifiable ISBN number) that the book even exists, let alone that it fulfils the criteria for |notable books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: the author's own words: "done it all from home only 50 copies of the book were made"; thus, easily fails .  The fact that there are other articles about books doesn't mean any article is accepted willy-nilly.  Best of luck with your work, but at this point the subject doesn't meet notability standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)