Deletion of Willie Levesque

Comment: WP:NHOCKEY only presumes notability it does not confer notability. And as far as I can find in new sources there isn't enough (or anything really) about him to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If you fail to meet , which is the basic criteria, then it doesn't really matter that you satisfy a condition of  which does not explicitly say that notability is guaranteed. And more importantly, the article doesn't meet . There is a single citation for the article which says he's a doctor in Connecticut -- and it's not actually a source, it's a link to a doctor's web page and there's no evidence that it's the Willie Levesque from the article. And based on your last sentence, it seems like your saying this article is a keep because I have a short explanation for deletion. Personally, my criteria for my !vote consists of more than that and I examine the article and evaluate it against the policies and guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:NHOCKEY||WP:N)

Comment: WP:NHOCKEY ''presumes'' notability, but does not guarantee it.  There really is not much in the way of coverage aside from routine game reports.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)