Deletion of Robert Sarmast

Comment: Looking at the Google News hits, he has certainly received significant coverage over several years in a large number of sources that are independent of the subject and that are usually regarded as reliable by Wikipedians, so he seems to pass  quite handily. Whether on not he ''should'' do so is quite a different question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As noted above, has certainly received plenty of coverage. I also disagree that this constitutes an ttack page--there is no disparaging or threatening language at all, that I can see; merely an admirably neutral-toned presentation and footnoting of the arguments against the subject's interpretations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)