Deletion of OnDeck

Comment: I agree with Bearian's intent, as this company might be notable, although I'm on the other side of the fence and looking at the article, it is so infused with promotional material and MOS issues that it would be better to simply |blow it up and start over. But give it a week and see if any work is done on it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: this is quite badly written and over-linked, but I'm not sure that  or  apply.  If nobody fixes it in the next six days, then I'd go along with DGG et al
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:SPAM)