Deletion of Axel Tuanzebe

Comment: per  failure. Can be restored if he ever plays professionally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: clearly not notable. Maybe  but who knows? —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: for the time being; player does not yet meet |the notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOT)

Comment: I provided above two references from in-depth articles last year that meet  (I never said the two recent ones met ).  These were http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-uniteds-teenage-starlet-axel-6814126 and http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/axel-tuanzebe-aiming-succeed-wayne-rooney-manchester-united-captain-1526679. If I understand the concern with them, is that while one does demonstrate  the second is derivative of the firet. Okay then, here are two more articles that are unrelated to the original two. http://www.sportskeeda.com/football/axel-tuanzebe-scout-report-the-profile-of-the-latest-manchester-united-wonder-kid and http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/who-axel-tuanzebe-manchester-united-8433867; two different writers, two different countries. These are examples of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  is met. The failure to meet  is not relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: I'm seeing a lot of media coverage in the last week alone on this player in major dailies, such as http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/530557/Man-United-youngsters-Axel-Tuanzebe-Andreas-Pereira-Jose-Mourinho-pre-season-Wigan and http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/jose-mourinho-hails-axel-tuanzebe-8434441 among others. I'm also seeing some older in-depth coverage of this player such as http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-uniteds-teenage-starlet-axel-6814126 and http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/axel-tuanzebe-aiming-succeed-wayne-rooney-manchester-united-captain-1526679. Player meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  and . A lot of the above arguments are very 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. I note the following about the sources put forward to allegedly satisfy GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject definitely fails , having played in no competitive fixtures in his career. Although there is some coverage in some newspapers, it does not seem to be beyond the normal attention of a talented youngster playing for a big side such as United so would fail  in my opinion. Simply being at the club does not make a player notable. Will probably make his debut soon enough but that would be against , so delete for now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Clear case of , fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: This person fails . As far as I can tell, he hasn't played in any fully-professional league, and I couldn't find a lot of coverage overall. Probably  for an article here, perhaps he'll be notable enough in a couple of years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: It is seeming to me that there is a hare and a tortoise situation here. The hare is for "delete", to be making a  perhaps? But the tortoise is not so much being for "keep" as for '''wait'''. Seeing the comments being made publicly by Jose Mourinho, it must be possible and even that likely that Tuanzebe will be playing in the FA Community Shield on 7 August, only three weeks time. Surely in case like this one, it is better using some  and waiting until, let us be saying, the end of August? The player then being indeed part of Mourinho's plans, we will surely be seeing him in first team in August. Can the deletion request not be deferred until then, otherwise it being recreated only three or four weeks after being deleted? '''Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:COMMONSENSE)