Deletion of Ena Kadic

Comment: nbsp; All contestants at Miss World meet our basic notability rule that topics have reliably sourced information showing that they attract the attention of the world at large.&nbsp; I have recently verified at the WP:RS noticeboard that a Miss World biography is accepted as a WP:RS for personal biographical information, including age.&nbsp; Massive international coverage is found on the first page of the Google "Find sources" link, including from England, Ireland, Australia, Phillipines, and yahoo.com.&nbsp; Likewise, the link provided by Linguist111, of Google news, shows the same pattern including Italy and Hungary.&nbsp; The nomination has not followed the minimal search documented at .&nbsp; Nor has the nomination checked and reported on the effect on the "What Links Here" were this article to be deleted, nor considered that non-notability is not a deletion argument when the topic is covered elsewhere in the encyclopedia (see nsignificance).&nbsp; The delete !votes have not shown any attempt at determining notability.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:I)

Comment: meets , having received a notable award, argument about a lack of articles for other winners is a case of . also, scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants reads "This WikiProject will cover the creation, editing, and organization of articles related to state, national and international beauty pageants, their delegates and winners." which therefore includes Miss Austria winners. Maybe, some of the above deleters can assist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST)