Deletion of Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc (The West Wing)

Comment: which also silences the ''keep because you can't delete merged content'' votes. So, this article fails #PLOT and doesn't ''specifically'' establish otability. Plus per , this means there is no basis for a stand-alone episode article. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N||WP:AVOIDSPLIT)

Comment: per sgeureka. At present the article consists entirely of plot summary, and the sources cited also consist essentially of plot summary. Our articles should not be plot summaries per . The fact that article content has already been merged into another article does not mean the debate has to be closed as Keep, or that AfD is an improper venue
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per sgeureka. If the only sources we have are plot summaries, there is nothing to indicate the episode has any individual notability, and no reason to believe that it is capable of being expanded in order to avoid being ineligible per #PLOT
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Firstly,  is not a test, so cannot be passed or failed. We can't say an article "fails" . Plot summaries have their place. I would agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:PLOT)