Deletion of Shiksa

Comment: per Carrite and Smerdis of Tlön.  This needed work |before it was nominated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: To me this is a clear case of ikipedia is not a dictionary.  The article is about the word, not about the people. I am sure there are articles about Jewish/non-Jewish relationships where this could redirect to a section which mentions various terms involved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: This seems like a fairly clear keep to me.  The notability I do not think is in question so it is really a question of whether there is room in Wikipedia for a term like this.  The example of a concept / term at #Dict is Truthiness which does not seem to distinguish itself in any way other than the amount of content included in the article.  Similarly terms like nigger|the "n" word or wop are considered acceptable.  Closer to this topic both yid and Jewish-American princess are considered ok describing jewish people which makes me wonder what is the distinction being drawn by the proposing editor.  More to the point - Could the article be bolstered?  Absolutely.  I think a good start might be uses in popular culutre (see: Shiksappeal) or the recent use of the term to describe Chelsea Clinton in respect of her marriage to a jewish man.  It appears that when the article was created there was more of this content but it has been removed in the last two years.  Adding back conent from previous versions would seem like a good place to go. Alternatively a good etymological overview or an exploration of how the term was used in Yiddish speaking contexts versus how it is used casually by jews in america.  Finally it is worth noting that Shegetz is not part of this discussion despite the fact that "The term has enjoyed less currency in English than the feminine shiksa
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)