Deletion of Oligo Primer Analysis Software (2nd nomination)

Comment: and '''cleanup''' — The two people seem to meet  with notability shown by having multiple academic works published. Oligo also meets the |general notability guideline with many secondary sources coming from academic sources - which are the most reliable of all the |reliable sources. While I do not like the "footnote abuse," either, that is more of an issue of cleanup rather than deletion. Otherwise, I do not see spam nor evidence of a |walled garden
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GARDEN)

Comment: This is more of a cleanup issue than a delete. The software is now referenced (needs cleanup) by enough achedemic publications to establish notability in its field. Google matches: There are 2,480 exact matches for "Wojciech Rychlik" and 6780 matches on "Molecular Biology Insights" "inc.", much of which are 2nd and 3rd party research references. I believe the article meets  and  policy, but it needs cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)