Deletion of Prince Michael of Sealand

Comment: it's an  argument, but he's more notable than Travis McHenry in basically every way.  Possibly rename back to Michael Bates, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: meets the GNG in my opinion as demonstrated by the sources given above by Kbabej. More importantly, I don't think the nomination's use of  as a reason for deletion is in the spirit of the policy. The coverage of Mr Bates is in reference to his leadership of the purported nation of Sealand—this is not an "event" as required by the BLP1E policy, but a continuing activity. An event is inherently time-limited (the canonical examples we usually refer to in the context of this policy are crime victims or perpetrators)—Mr Bates's claim to notability is for a rather open-ended reason: he will presumably continue to claim to be leader—or indeed Prince—of Sealand until his death (or abdication/succession?). Notable or not, BLP1E is quite clearly inapplicable in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)