Deletion of Liam Dearg Ó Mainnín

Comment: this article and the other 2 included in the nom). The subject would appear to fail  and . By some distance. In terms of the former (NCRIMINAL), even if the subject's crimes were confirmed (and not, as seems to be the case, loosely alleged and possibly apocryphal), any related article would cover those events/crimes. And the subject's role in them (alongside that of the subject's accomplices/"confederates"). If the subject was a contemporary thief/murderer, and his crimes were notable enough, we would have an article about the crimes. Not about the criminal(s). In terms of the latter (SIGCOV), I can find nothing at all about the subject or his crimes in the typical sources (not https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=%22Liam+Dearg%22+%22Mainn%C3%ADn%22 JSTOR, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Liam+Dearg%22+%22Mainn%C3%ADn%22&btnG= Scholar, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Liam+Dearg%22+%22Mainn%C3%ADn%22+-wikipedia&tbm=bks&oq=%22Liam+Dearg%22+%22Mainn%C3%ADn%22+-wikipedia&gs_l= Books or anywhere else). If the subject is covered anywhere it would seem to be in the single work/book which supports the text. And, even in that work, the subject is far from the main biographical topic. A passing mention in one book fails SIGCOV. By a country mile. Mine is a firm "delete" recommendation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIMINAL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: this and the other 2 - fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIMINAL)