Deletion of List of American film actresses

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: I'm usually quoting  at , so it's nice to see it used here are AfD, especially with a focus on the  section's explanation of why existence of one has no relevance to deletion of a corresponding category, list or navigation template. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American film actors is over three years old and had a rather narrow participation that would likely change if the article were recreated now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:CFD||WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: per , "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative. Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: There is nothing wrong with having a category and a list covering the same thing, per , since a list is more easily browsed, and since a list allows tracking removals. This means that the deletion of the list of actors due to it also being a category was not a wise move. The fact that some other article does not exist is not a convincing reason to delete a list about an extremely notable collection of entries in a field which has had a great deal of coverage for a century or so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)