Deletion of Jared Sawyer Jr.

Comment: None of the sources seem to be significant non-routine news coverage. A careful analysis reveals that this young person fails . And yes, this is a violation of the terms of use
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)

Comment: paid TOU violation created by a CU confirmed sock that is obvious spam, so excluded by . The fact that this is paid and the subject is a young BLP makes deletion in this case even more of a good idea because of previous attempts we have had to blackmail the subjects of paid biographies (not this article, but others). Per my arguments in the last AfD: notability is also not established: most of the sourcing is trivial or local. Car crash articles do not establish notability, even if it is the Atlanta paper, because the Atlanta paper routinely covers car crashes. I don't think he's notable, but at most he is borderline, and given the paid concerns, deletion is the best outcome
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM)

Comment: still .   doesn't apply to BLPs very well, but obviously isn't met, and neither is any other SNG.  References such as https://atlantadailyworld.com/2013/06/06/15-year-old-minister-to-host-atlanta-youth-leadership-conference/ don't suggest that GNG is met either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CLERGY)