Deletion of Shoryuken

Comment: this isn't "cruft." Now the cruft article, ''that's'' cruft. Have you ever considered the idea that  and the notability guidelines and #GAMEGUIDE are '''rulecruft'''? This isn't a gameguide. If you don't want the article to explain the sequence, remove it. This is notable. Do you seriously think that Shoryuken has not been written about in any magazines or on any websites? Anyone who has played a game in the ''Street Fighter'' franchise, which has sold over 25 million copies, knows what a Shoryuken is. Deleting this article doesn't make Wikipedia any better. And it's obviously a plausible search term, so it should at least be a redirect, but it doesn't just appear in ''Street Fighter II''. Your plug of Gamefaqs doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Rwiggum, from May 2006 to February 2008 you had a total of 14 edits. You didn't edit at all from January 22, 2007 to February 11, 2008. Do have another username on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Unreferenced, quite possibly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: no assertion of notability via significant coverage in |reliable sources independent of the topic. In absence of such notability, inappropriate article per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: no assertion of notability via significant coverage in |reliable sources independent of the topic, aka cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: to Street Fighter II. Fails both  and OT because of lack of |reliable secondary sources establishing notability as well as consisting of nothing but in-universe  material and |unnecessary trivia. Plausible search term, however
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:TRIVIA)