Deletion of The Irrational Atheist

Comment: Putting this article up for deletion has been on my list of things to do for a while now.  The above keep comments don't get to the heart of the issue--this book doesn't meet either  or .  There are 3 reviews, but all of them are for limited (not general) audiences, and  states that in order to qualify on reviews alone, at least one and preferably more must be for a general audience.  I have argued that at least one of those doesn't even qualify as a legitimate source, as it's hosted on a blog, not a news source.  One reference states that it was part of the 2007 NOR Christmas recommendations for NOR, but that article recommends several dozen other books, so the coverage is hardly signoficant. The only other reference isn't even about this book but about where the name comes from.  As such, this book has not met our notability criteria, and must be deleted (unless, of course, others find more references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BK||WP:BK)

Comment: While I'm not sure that they'll check back in, if they do, I'd like to request the keep people who are saying "it's notable enough for an encyclopedia" to please explain how it meets either of the relevant notability guidelines-- or .  To simply assert that it is notable is not enough.  As a side note, that it's in 118 libraries is also insufficient, as that's not one of our criteria (and, to be honest, I'd argue that only 118 libraries actually practically proves a lack of notability, as that is a tiny number in my opinion--and the very fact that we disagree shows why that's not enough to verify notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BK)