Deletion of 100 Greatest African Americans

Comment: see below). Disruptive, y nomination by :Who’s Who in Nebraska's disgruntled author. No valid reason for deletion given:  specifically says that it doesn't cover encyclopedias. http://atheism.about.com/od/bookreviews/fr/GreatestAA.htm, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sun_sentinel/access/973427851.html?dids=973427851:973427851&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+22%2C+2006&author=COMPILED+BY+FAYOLA+SHAKES&pub=South+Florida+Sun+-+Sentinel&desc=BLACK+HISTORY+STUDY+PROVIDES+%60WHOLE+NEW+PERSPECTIVE%27&pqatl=google
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:BK)

Comment: Unless someone can find real standards on how reference books are rated, I guess we just have to rely on , which I do believe it passes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)