Deletion of David J. Pollay

Comment: while Pollay has had a passing mention in one ''Business Week'' article, it's down on page 2 of the online version, thus failing |the requirement of "Significant coverage".  That is the only |reliable source in the whole article, and the |burden of verification is on the creator (Pollay or his agent) to prove. #HOST|Wikipedia is not a web host to be filled with |trademark neologisms and |self promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:BURDEN||WP:NOT||WP:NEO||WP:SPIP)

Comment: The article is the work of a hideous  that has come here solely to inflict , , and M upon us.  One of his self-promotional articles was relegated to red-link land and then redirected to his autobio article--what a treat for us!  Mr. Pollay has no notability whatsoever.  There are real writers out there who are known for multiple works throughout the years.  Even a cursory look at his record reveals that he is not one of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:AUTO||WP:COI||WP:SPAM)