Deletion of KreataGlobal

Comment: There's enough RS coverage to meet , e.g. http://gadgets.ndtv.com/social-networking/news/facebook-selects-kerala-it-firm-for-programme-223080 http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Kreata-Global-buys-Kochi-startup-firm/articleshow/27229945.cms http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-06-18/news/29674221_1_digital-media-infopark-marketing Note, however, that the Reuters link http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/11/25/digital-marketing-firm-kreata-global-acq-idINDEE9AO05F20131125 was actually provided by VCCircle, not Reuters, and so is of questionable reliability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: On all the searches i see : "Acquisition of Flamingos - Flamingos is given more importance than Kreata Global". "Facebook Preferred Marketing Developer - Its an award it got only but doesn't say anything about the company" "Buys a new office space in Kochi". Thats all?? All that has been mentioned in the and still its a stub. So expect Facebook what all service lines does it deal in?? What is the Employee metrics of the company?? How much revenues does it generate? What is its operating profit? What is its history? Any other updated news in the recent time?(FB news was in 2012). Where all does it serve??? I am virtually getting no idea of what more content can be added.Audiences are more interested in the above mentioned things rather than where it bought a new office. Acquisitions are needed in an article but only a single Acquisition can not make an article. There is practically nothing as of now that can be added to the content of the company so that it doesn't remain a stub. I quote "If sources do not exist, it is generally too soon for an article on that topic to be considered". The creator of this page is also a . So if anything relevant about the article is added it might not be referenced and will require additional citations which we don't have any as of now. So what is the point if we cannot provide something substantial in an article except some trivial acquisition in 2012/13.Wikipedia is not a place for definitions or news releases. If any one does provide relevant sources then i have no objection to it remaining an article.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)