Deletion of Coronavirus pandemic anti-Muslim riots in India

Comment: per nom. Article fails  and . It only talks about social media conversations and sources are nearly all about 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: but rename per . There are multiple instances of coverage in reliable, secondary sources however the article title is somewhat confusing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NATURALNESS)

Comment: as patent nonsense. The article is clearly a case of  as if it were made by someone who was neither happy with the AfD on the Tagleegi Jamaat hotspot nor the Deletion Review that followed it. Blaming a politician who died in 1968? Ridiculous
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: The title certainly doesn't seem to match the content, but |that can be fixed. The article also needs to be copy-edited for non-neutral language. However, I'm suprised anyone would argue this topic is not notable. The topic has received extensive international coverage (you can see the sources in the article) and the current one-line descriptions in some articles are not sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:FIXIT)

Comment: to 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi as the  given that the length of both articles permits and all the sources are only about that event clear   and  given that the length of both articles permit it and are not too long
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: This is a clear case of . There is no ongoing riot in India, and a minor (300k) Twitter trend doesn't advocate a riot. Most politically-motivated trends on Twitter are either done by netbots or are manipulated.(https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/political-propaganda-in-india-twitter-trends-hashtags) The other sources used in the formation of this article are much more relevant to 2020 Delhi riots or List of Islamophobic incidents. Considering the article's basic premise is wrong, it should be deleted immediately
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Everyone (delete and keep !voters alike) agrees that the article was rife with POV issues, half truths and distortions of sources. Hell, the original title itself was deceptive and misleading falsehood insofar as the page had to be moved to a new title in the midst of this AfD. Notwithstanding the page move and the drastic changes which followed, the article still contained instances of blatant source falsifications (Special:Diff/952414208|1, Special:Diff/952440287|2, Special:Diff/952475573|3, Special:Diff/952846529|4) left, right and centre.{{paragraph}}Now, coming to the subject itself, sources that have been provided to claim notability and importance of the topic at issue, discuss the subject in the context of the Tablighi Jamaat incident, making it clear that the supposed Islamphobia was in reaction to the foregoing incident.{{paragraph}}Anti-Muslim reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic in India#Social_media_controversies is hardly encyclopedic content, and once we get rid of it, there is hardly left anything that's not, or cannot be covered in the above-mentioned article on 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi, which is precisely where this stuff needs to be, for, as I mentioned above, reliable sources deem this to be a reaction to the Jamaat incident. Perhaps, a reading of  #1 might be in order here. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: The ''Keep'' comments don't hold water because hoaxes and conspiracy theories also get coverage in reliable sources. Being |covered by reliable sources isn't enough and the subject must abide by . Why there is no article about Anti-Chinese reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic, given Chinese people are the biggest victims of coronavirus-based discrimination? I also wonder why there is no Anti-Muslim reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United Kingdom,https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/anger-wing-uk-voices-predict-ramadan-virus-spread-200413170844190.htmlhttps://www.arabnews.com/node/1655056/worldhttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/05/police-investigate-uk-far-right-groups-over-anti-muslim-coronavirus-claimshttps://www.newsweek.com/islam-muslims-coronavirus-lockdown-ramadan-islamophobia-1498499 Anti-Muslim reactions to the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United Stateshttps://www.businessinsider.com/trump-claims-mosques-could-avoid-lockdown-accused-of-islamophobia-2020-4https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-churches-mosques-minnesota/false-claim-minnesotas-government-allowing-mosques-to-remain-open-while-churches-must-close-amidst-covid-19-outbreak-idUSKCN2232DEhttps://dailytimes.com.pk/599089/islamic-organisation-slams-trumps-divisive-attempt-to-target-muslims-during-coronavirus-pandemic/ despite being ''widely covered'' by reliable sources? We can agree that this |POVFORK reeks of POV pushing. Sources are only sharing variety of opinions already covered at 2020 Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi, and as such this POVFORK lacks notability independent of that subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:GNG||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per  and  as mentioned above. Better to be covered elsewhere. Not only is this article unconstructive but also the information has not been fully sourced as well as distorting and stirring the truth. It is an obvious POV issue with some hidden agenda by certain individuals who do not agree with a neutral discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:GNG)

Comment: read'''  and ''check'' your votes (they should be !votes). Any mention of riots is now irrelevant as it no longer exists in the article. If that is your sole basis for an article you're going to really struggle since there is verified content. There is policy on which to !vote (both ways), use it. This is not a poll, and a worthwhile essay is Wikipedia:Shadowless Fists of Death! - read all of a policy/guideline and understand it before using
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: article fails ,  and looks completely like . This can be merged into article related to COVID-19 in India or in Tablighi Jamaat hotspots
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HOAX||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Seems , possibly  too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:PEW)