Deletion of Audrey Jones

Comment: Lord mayor is a ceremonial role that rotates annually among the city councillors, not an inherently notable role that guarantees a Wikipedia article. And while Birmingham is large and important enough that its city councillors could clear the bar if their articles featured substantive content about their political importance and were well-referenced to significant press coverage, they also don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing — but this article literally just states that she exists, the end, and references the fact to two pieces of coverage in the context of her ''health status'', one |primary source, one photograph, and ''zero'' coverage of her ''political career''. This is not the depth of substance or the type of sourcing we require to deem a local politician notable enough for an international encyclopedia: the notability test for municipal politicians is the ability to write a ''substantive'' article, not just the ability to verify that she exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: I added some more sources and information. I wonder if the coverage on her experimental treatment https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/jan/20/genetics.science here, https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-news/10000-mile-trip-brings-fresh-hope-943365 here and https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-news/ex-mayor-counts-the-cost-of-her-fight-for-life-952261 here would be enough to satisfy 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)