Deletion of Frontiers (non-profit organization)

Comment: The first sentence of this article may be copyvio from http://www.frontiers.org/Websites/frontiers/Images/Home/mainpictype7.jpg this image and other places. However, they do have ''some'' news mentions, such as a January 30, 1995 article in ''The Vancouver Sun'' and another in a March 9, 1996 article in the ''Calgary Herald''. There appears to be controversy surrounding the group, as mentioned in an article in http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1006724411371834040.html?mod=googlewsj The WSJ. They appear to be just across the threshold of ; "Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by sources that are reliable and independent of the organization", which can be verified in at least the above articles. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I could not find any sources through google, though admittedly the organisation's name is difficult to isolate and google certainly does not have everything but there are no eliable sources|Reliable sources given in the article either. I see that Mendaliv, above, has found some "mentions" but just because organisations international in scale are ''usually'' notable does not mean that they are. In the end, we still need independent sources to meet the core policies of , , and . If reliable sources really can be added, my suggestion would be keep and clean-up for NPOV. Otherwise, delete and create upon discovery of adequate reliable, independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)