Deletion of What Is Your Dangerous Idea?: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Unthinkable

Comment: I am a bit confused by the arguments given above. The guideline applicable to this article is . Could you specify more in detail which of its criteria you think this book fulfills? Why do these justify a "speedy keep" (i.e. terminating the AfD process prematurely
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: Despite showing up in 203 libraries according to Worldcathttp://www.worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/top3mset/71286720 and thus falling under the exlusionary criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Other considerations, finding reliable third party reviews of the book has proven difficult. Unfortunately, the established notability of an author does not make for a notable book published by them; not automatically, that is. The book has several things going for it that do establish some slight notability, though none that are included in the strict crtieria at . The publisher and author is notable, as are some of those interviewed. For this to be kept, current guidelines must first be changed. I happen to think the criteria is far too strict, but that is just me. I am considering proposing changes at  to the criteria on the project's talk page. So delete per guidelines, unless more than one ''reliable'' and ''noteworthy'' third party review and/or critical commentary on the work can be produced as a reference. Then i will happily change my vote to keep, per current guidelines. A case where I don't even agree with my own vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:BK)