Deletion of Claycord.com

Comment: The most promising sources are these two interviews,http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/3-questions-the-Mayor-of-Claycord-3285259.phphttp://streetfightmag.com/2013/01/24/under-a-bushel-in-bay-area-a-model-for-hyperlocal/ and all of the others just seem to be passing mentions. This isn't quite the level of coverage needed to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This is an interview. The SF Gate is a reliable source, so I'd count this as usable. However a lot of people tend to depreciate interviews and call them a primary source if the interview is posted "as is" and is more a series of questions and answers rather than a writeup of the interview. What works against this article is that it's fairly short, so many might consider it a  source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:TRIVIAL)

Comment: Deletion is premature. Per the deletion policy there are less drastic |alternatives to deletion. There has never been any mention of deletion on the Talk:Claycord.com page. The article was vetted by the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation Articles for Creation Project (AfC) and approved by {{u|Gtwfan52}} (now known as {{u|John from Idegon}} and approved on 18 June 2013. The AfD nominating Editor {{u|Drmies}} has made no efforts to improve the page, discuss on Talk, or carefully place maintenance tags (with explanation on the article Talk page). Since 2013 the article has never received maintenance tags or negative input on the Talk page. The article has been edited since 2013 by six respected Editors and none placed tags or proposed deletion. Please withdraw the deletion nomination and proceed with normal article improvement protocols. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)