Deletion of Ruth Blake

Comment: I think #C1 She is cited in https://books.google.com/books?id=xHCuBKJZJXQC&pg=PA161&dq=Ruth+E.+Blake+is+an+American+geophysicist&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjC4Nb0ma_oAhVSZM0KHVf9AxYQ6AEwAHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=Ruth%20E.%20Blake%20is%20an%20American%20geophysicist&f=false Sulfur Biogeochemistry: Past and Present, Issue 379 and https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=71pR4gYAAAAJ&hl=en cited in many more
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: It is hard to assess rof#C1 because the writer of this poorly written BLP has not provided a GS profile
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per {{u|David Eppstein}}; I think #C1 is adequately met here (and so  is beside the point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Ten publications with over 100 citations each on Google Scholar is enough for #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)