Deletion of History Mapping

Comment: As it stands, the nominator is completely correct.  The article is pure  using zero valid reliable sources.  It could just be returned to draft space so the OR issues can be resolved, but I have my doubts that this would be able to pass the  regardless.  I've done some searches, and I have found zero reliable sources that discuss the concept, at least not under the name of "History Mapping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH||WP:GNG)

Comment: too much original research/.  Plus, I'm not convinced that the '''subject''' hasn't existed in the forms of movies and videos prior to the age of YouTube, but not necessarily with this name.  I'm remembering the Schoolhouse Rock social-studies/history/geography "episodes" where animated maps were integral to the video.  These date from the 1970s.  I'm sure they weren't the first to use the concept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: The subject of this AFD is the article in point, and not the subject.  The article consists of |original research and appears to be trying to publicize the work of certain amateurs.  Wikipedia should not be used for disguised advertising of amateurs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)