Deletion of One Piece Games

Comment: One Piece Games is not a game company, it's just the title of an article that lists games made about the One Piece franchise.  The nominated articles are different enough to require separate AfDs, but I think I would say keep for each one since they are non-redundant lists that fall under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: I may be wrong, but judging from your initial comments, you, good sir, seem to be under the assumption that One Piece is primarily a game series, while it is in fact an anime/manga series. Since Naruto et al gets to keep its attack lists and such (Ninjutsu (Naruto)|like this, for instance), One Piece should keep its own. Concerning the minor and filler characters--would you prefer if we made individual articles for each one? To quote the  article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: I like to know exactly which part of the 11 categories of "indiscriminate knowledge" in  does these pages fall under and how are these pages not covered by ? There has been a awful lot of fiction related articles being put up for AfD recently using the claim "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" as the sole reason even though the article doesn't fall under any of the 11 categories of "indiscriminate knowledge" and are permitted by the  notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT||WP:FICT)