Deletion of Suspension Training

Comment: towards keep.  I declined the speedy on this one, and added the NYT reference.  I was going to continue to see if this was viable, but decided to go offline instead.  Not to a gym, just to a different television|sitting position like most Wikipedians I presume.  Gazimoff's references are very good, seem independent.  Yes, this was added from a new editor, presumable a  editor, but I think it just might be notable.  I very much like Trulyblue's draft more than this one, they can easily be merged.  In fact, Trulyblue, be |bold and do it!  You are allowed to update the article while the debate runs.  In fact, I just gutted the good faith  out of it, as it wasn't helping this debate at all
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:BOLD||WP:OR)

Comment: Either delete it per  more of an ad then an informative article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: Sources can be found in the http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/01/fashion/01Fitness.html?_r=1&oref=slogin New York Times, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article4227781.ece The Times, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1025238/Tone-just-hanging-Get-strapped-new-fitness-craze-America.html Daily Mail and http://www.military.com/military-fitness/workouts/trx-suspension-training Military.com. I'll see what I can do to improve the quality of the article (I haven't seen the inside of a gym in years) but I'd argue that this passes both  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: I moved the article to a more appropriate name, per the naming conventions at . Special:Contributions/S._Dean_Jameson|''S.''''D
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS)

Comment: I have updated with (I hope) a more NPOV version (with proponents and critics represented).  Therefore the above comments may not still be relevant. I think it meets |notability, given the number of google hits (OK, that's not exactly scientific, but it's been covered in various newspapers also
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: Now the article veers into  territory.  I am sorry, but in its current form this does not meet Wikipedia standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)