Deletion of Jason Hewlett

Comment: The subject passes . Source examples include, but are not limited to: {{cite web|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/695217168/Hewlett-dazzles-fans-with-talent-for-mimicry.html|title=Concert review: Hewlett dazzles fans with talent for mimicry|date=11 October 2007|work=DeseretNews.com}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.heraldextra.com/entertainment/arts-and-theatre/theatre/arts-hot-ticket-jason-hewlett-featured-guest-at-clean-comedy/article_aaa5f8a9-3cc5-59a8-a500-557f405ab81e.html|title=Arts Hot Ticket: Jason Hewlett featured guest at Clean Comedy Festival|work=Daily Herald}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwmusic/article/SCERA-to-Host-Free-Evening-with-Jason-Hewlett-96-20150825|title=SCERA to Host Free Evening with Jason Hewlett, 9/6|date=25 August 2015|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.parkrecord.com/scene/ci_27913173/|title=Jason Hewlett will perform 'An Evening for Ashlee' benefit|date=14 April 2015|publisher=}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865626805/Hes-going-public-again-for-a-very-good-cause.html?pg=all|title=About Utah: He's going public (again) for a very good cause|date=19 April 2015|work=DeseretNews.com}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.heraldextra.com/entertainment/arts-and-theatre/noted-impersonator-hewlett-to-deliver-free-fireside-at-scera/article_92b8880e-ba78-5d94-8c85-2099ae961a03.html|title=Noted impersonator Hewlett to deliver free fireside at SCERA|work=Daily Herald}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/devinthorpe/2015/09/02/this-show-is-absolutely-safe-for-work/|title=This Show Is Absolutely Safe For Work|work=Forbes}}. {{ping|Ffffrank}} If you'd like, you can always withdraw the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Thanks for taking the time to do some research.  I did read  and to be perfectly honest, this is all new to me and it is possible that I skipped a step.  Your sources do demonstrate... something?  Not sure if it rises to level of "notability" but it may.  I suppose at the least, I find fault with the content of the article and it doesn't appear that the content has generated much interest or editors over the last few years.  There are a lot of facts but they do not seem to come from relevant and published secondary sources.  I'm assuming they come from a press release.  I don't feel comfortable removing 90% of the articles content but perhaps that is a better solution and will inspire one of his fans to fill it back in with properly cited information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Editors new to AFD should understand that the question we address here is not whether the page is well-written, promotional, or even whether the page is sourced.  Our question is whether sources about the topic exist (even though they are not currently on the page) and whether they are sufficient to meet  or .  As experienced editor
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: While I disagree with the concept that we don't delete articles which are highly promotional per , that can be a valid reason, I don't think this article, especially after the editing done in recent weeks, qualifies per that rationale. And since that has been taken off the table, the sources clearly pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL4||WP:GNG)