Deletion of United States resolution on the 90th anniversary of the Latvian Republic

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS, which is Wikipedia policy, says, "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. "  In this case I cannot see how a scattering of references in ''Pravda'' and Latvian newspapers qualifies the resolution as "newsworthy".  I don't even know if any of those sources could even be considered |reliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: If 2010 Moscow Victory Day Parade (or the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Moscow_Victory_Day_Parade 2008, or the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Moscow_Victory_Day_Parade 2009 ones) doesn't run afoul of  (which I don't think it does), then neither does this. Article already has secondary sources in it, and a 90th anniversary is obviously notable if it is celebrated within a country, and covered in the country's (and neighbors') sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Wikipedia is not here to repeat the text of every resolution of every legislature in the world.  Unless there is substantial third party coverage of the resolution, it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: the article in question has be renamed and expanded, and the !votes above are related to the old article. The re-scoped article is about a series of events that occurred during 2008 that spanned geographical area per  receiving contiuous indepth coverage during the celebration per  and , hence is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:INDEPTH)