Deletion of Timeline relating to allegations of Israeli Apartheid

Comment: as a POV fork and original research (which includes "any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position" per: ).  If "merger" is really an issue I support that as well (with deletion of this article), but I believe that all of the information is already in one or both of the articles mentioned by Malik Shabazz.  The material in this timeline/article can be considered for inclusion in the Timeline of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  No new timeline should be created in Allegations of Israeli apartheid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Indeed it does look like "a timeline of the Arab-Israeli conflict/Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with a few items related to people referring to Israel or its policies as apartheid," but this is because bad-faith editors hoping for a merge/delete have intentionally loaded it with irrelevancies, |original research, and  violations in order to create the appearance you're talking about.  The "few items" you refer to were the ones added by good-faith editors, and constitute the ''raison d'être'' of the article.  Keep/delete recommendations should not be based on a vandalized version of the timeline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:POINT)

Comment: Roughly two-thirds of the items on this timeline were intentional violations of , added by an editor who opposes this article on grounds of |original research (not an unwitting irony but rather a deliberate ).  Editors should have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_relating_to_allegations_of_Israeli_Apartheid&oldid=137280044 this version before voting; though arguably flawed, it reflects the good-faith version of the timeline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NOR||WP:POINT)