Deletion of John F. Kennedy assassination in popular culture

Comment: WP:OR isn't something negotiable because the event is significant. What I haven't seen is anyone address the issues raised for deletion.  are not good reasons to keep an article. There are a lot of things wikipedia is not  and a soapbox, or a publisher of original thought is not it. I expect the closing admin will keep this in mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NOT)

Comment: this is yet another #DIR|directory of loosely associated topics. The items on the list do not gain notability for depicting or in some way referencing the JFK assassination, and the notion that the assassination somehow becomes more culturally significant because it's referenced in episodes of Seinfeld or parodied in music videos demonstrates a fundamental failure to grasp history, not to mention being somewhat insulting. There could I'm sure be an encyclopedic article written on this topic but this "ooh, look, a JFK assassination reference" collection of crap is not it. No one would suggest that the assassination itself is not notable. That does not mean that every single reference to it is, and of course no topic "deserves" an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia articles are not entitlements or rewards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)