Deletion of Protein Wisdom (blog) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Note: I have just ly merged relevant content of Deborah Frisch article into Protein Wisdom and made Deborah Frisch into a redirect to Protein Wisdom. See Talk:Deborah Frisch#Replaced by redirect. (These edits were motivated by discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archimedes Plutonium (third nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: In my opinion, this article does ''not'' satisfy , which states "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself."  In the provided citations, this blog is only mentioned in passing in the context of a disagreement between the blog's owner and someone else --- the content of the blog is irrelevant in these cites, aside from a single quote from Goldstein in the Washington Post.  This doesn't appear to rise to the level of "multiple non-trivial published works
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)