Deletion of Paola Sebastiani

Comment: perhaps Salih could explain just how this person meets ? At the same time: I just had a look at this person's website and I see a large number of publications in good journals. Of course, number of publications does not say anything about notability, but almost always people with many publications turn out to fulfill at least some of the criteria of . So I don't agree when the nom says "nothing here to suggest notability". Perhaps the nom would care to explain just why there is no notability here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: despite the overblown SPA vote and overhyped article. Web of Science actually lists more articles than Scopus (67, excluding a number of abstracts), although the citation counts are lower: 86, 65, 56, 44, 33 (with Sebastiani being first author on #1, 2, and 4). Total number of citations to date 660, h-index of 14. This is a little below what I usually would judge notable, but the trend for all these articles and citations is clearly towards a rapid increase (currently 160 citations/year). Without using a |crystal ball it seems clear that even should she miss the notability bar at this moment, she'll be over it very soon (even if she stopped working right this moment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). I am also an Associate Professor at an American University and happen to come across this page while looking up Dr. Sebastiani on Wikipedia. I see above that someone is concerned that the article about her does not add much, but actually, I find it very informative. For someone who wnats to find an expert on Bayesian Statistics and its applications in the biomedical field, this article is very helpful. Also, I know fo Dr. Sebastiani's work and the high regard her colleagues hold for her... I can tell you that she is incredibly respected and is highly sought after by academic  meeting organizers and editors seeking reviewers. The fact that she has a number of articles first authored by her students speaks to her fairness and desire to give proper credit and to promote their careers. I couldn't agree more with the person above who indicated that this is what senior academicians do! I also know that she has first authored vanguard/cutting edge articles such as the one in Nature Genetics and from meetings I have been to, she is currently leading other very cutting edge efforts that will no doubt be published soon. Well I have written alot, but as an academician myself, and given the few completely uninformed objections that I saw concerning the entry about Dr. Sebastiani, I just had to say something
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)