Deletion of Lansweeper

Comment: Notable per  and also improved in other ways after Djm-leighpark's work. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It is written like a documentation page. . In fact, the article looks like a rehash of this page: https://www.lansweeper.com/knowledgebase/introduction-to-the-help-desk/. Even assuming that reliable sources that prove the subject of article's impact could be found, everything written in this "article" so far needs to go. They are exactly what an encyclopedia does not want
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL)

Comment: There was a spate of undisclosed conflict of edit / paid editing on this article (at great inconvenience to the nom. I may add) which has been seemingly brought under control.  I have also reworked the article to remove paid editing content.  No doubt it may issues but undisclosed paid editing has been removed and it is not an unambigous advert as at {{Oldid|Lansweeper|923328068}}.  A lifespan of 15 years and the appearance of CVEs on the mitre.org database are indicators of product significance.  I think when additional references were introduced 22 October 2019 efforts to remove the article moved towards emphasing the coi/paid editing which is fair enough and perhaps I should have clocked it myself earlier. And while not ever reference satisifies  per  I select initially the following as demonstrating both  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:THREE||WP:NSOFTWARE||WP:GNG)