Deletion of Fiafia

Comment: all of Coin945's AfDs from today as a procedural matter. Coin945 has nominated ''72'' articles in a short space of time with a questionable rationale ("long-term lack of sourcing" -- see ) and no indication of , with {{noping|Uncle G}} finding that a number of them can have their notability confirmed on literally the first page of Google results. This is not something the relatively small group of people who work AfD can realistically handle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: this may seem like an "unimportant concept" to me as an American, but I imagine it matters to the people of Tokelau. There are three references here, everything is |verifiable; it's just a stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Clearly falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: Update. The article has just been improved with new references. I think it is fair to say that this is definitely NOT an unimportant topi. My  was not sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: To quote from : {{tq|Each article in an encyclopedia is about a person, a people, a concept, a place, an event, a thing, etc., whereas a dictionary entry is primarily about a word, an idiom, or a term and its meanings, usage and history.}} This is not the case here, though I see how the pre-expansion version of this article gives that immediate impression. I commend the finding of sources that should have been found 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:BEFORE)