Deletion of Hemant Shesh

Comment: Appears to fail .  Searching for anything that would help the article meet that criteria was not successful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Subject has received coverage in at least five reliable sources (simply not naming an author doesn't make a source unreliable, as that's the standard practise of many high-quality sources with strong editorial processes, such as the BBC or the Times of Malta). While many of them are about a single award win, two cover the rest of his career instead. BLP1E as currently written applies only when the person is covered only in the context of the event and is otherwise low-profile, as SudoGhost's quote above makes clear, so the additional sources not about the award mean that this isn't a concern. And since when was a 600-word article entirely about a person a "minor mention"?! Never mind whether or not the award win satisfies ANYBIO (I would suggest that by itself it probably doesn't), this is more than enough to meet the fundamental standards of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per  criterion 1. The subject has received widespread coverage in reliable sources for winning a major literary award:http://www.hindu.com/2010/11/29/stories/2010112959370300.htmhttp://www.hindustantimes.com/Poet-Hemant-Shesh-gets-Bihari-Puraskar-2009/Article1-631814.aspxhttp://www.hindustantimes.com/Bihari-Puraskar-for-poet-Shesh/Article1-525628.aspxhttp://www.24dunia.com/english-news/shownews/0/Hemant-Shesh-gets-Birla-Foundations-Bihari-award/8259467.html. There's also http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-01-20/jaipur/28377793_1_literature-festival-rajasthani-literary-festival this article in The Times of India|another reliable source describing him as "a distinguished poet, art-critic and columnist". We have enough sources in the Roman alphabet, which is not Shesh's native script, to establish notability, so I'm sure that plenty more could be found in Devanagari
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Clear |autobio. I don't how the award Bihari Puraskar is considered notable. Firstly, it is given to people who write only in Rajasthani which is not a major language in India (in the article it states that it is spoken by over 80 million people, but the http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement1.htm 2001 census data says otherwise). Secondly, only articles about this individual winning the award seem to come out of Google/Yahoo searches. I guess the media coverage about the award has more to do with an IAS officer receiving it. &mdash; ''':en
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO)

Comment: The references from ''The Hindu'', ''Hindustan Times'', ''Dainik Bhaskar'', ''Dainik Jagran'' (all newspapers with a daily circulation of more than a million and well established editorial processes) as well as others from ''Naiduniya'' that are now included in the article are sufficient to pass . There are also more Hindi sources out there and Google cache shows me one from ''The Times of India'' but the link does not go through. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)