Deletion of Abhijit Pawar

Comment: Not many people become MDs of companies such as Sakal at the age at which he assumed the title, when he succeeded  his dad. And not many MDs of such companies can take off for a month's holiday to Disneyland and the USA with their family, just like that.  But then, when asked about this, he said: "I've put professionals in place and I pay them to manage things. I am not here to manage them." (quoted here: http://www.business-standard.com/article/beyond-business/newsmaker-abhijit-pawar-108050901039_1.html). In other words, money talks.  But it is Sakal money. Which is why I think the Sakal Media Group page is sufficient. Sakal made him and not vice versa. All other positions he holds emanate from his standing at Sakal, and the family name, connections and money. His other positions may be off-topic as far as the Sakal article goes, as someone has pointed out on this AfD Page, but those positions alone would not make anyone notable per , so it boils down to his MD post at Sakal. Had he continued doing whatever he was doing in Munich, we might never have heard of him. If Sakal remains a family business and  his son succeeds him one day, just as he has suceeded his father, the son, too, in all likelihood, will have the same sort of standing this man has. Notability in such cases  is incidental.  So, yes, I  think that the Sakal article is where he belongs. The additional bit in this article about his education and the degree he earned  is cosmetic and could be included there. His predecessor, his father Pratap Pawar, who actually built up the company, has no WP article. He is, however, mentioned in passing in the Sakal article, implying that MDs come and go. Here today, gone tomorrow. The Pawar family took over the company in 1985  (see company history in the Sakal article) so one can understand why a Pawar holds the post. It is not like The Coca-Cola Company where the CEO has to earn his position.  I am in favour of this article being deleted. If not, redirecting it to Sakal may be  better than keeping it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)