Deletion of Banner page

Comment: and redirect to print spooler. The article is clearly more than a dicdef, going into history, purpose, and  properties of banners. These were  much more important in the early days of timeshare systems, when most computer output came in printed form and shared printing was standard. Sadly, a lot of those old computer manuals and magazines describing banner practice and styles are offline. Nonetheless, production of banner pages are part of most print spooler protocols, e.g., http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/819-7355/gfjji/index.html in Unix and http://support.microsoft.com/kb/102712 in Windows. Banner pages are also described in books http://books.google.com/books?id=X_5eJSBSH8QC&pg=PT141&dq=printing+banner+page&hl=en&sa=X&ei=iqWJUqT1KsiN3AWg74DoDg&ved=0CF4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=printing%20banner%20page&f=false,  http://books.google.com/books?id=Cs5QAAAAMAAJ&q=printing+banner+page&dq=printing+banner+page&hl=en&sa=X&ei=t6WJUtj6E6bq2gXBk4HQBQ&ved=0CF0Q6AEwBDgK and in standards documents like http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1179.txt RFC1179. I don't know if these sources are enough for a standalone article, but they are more than enough for a section in print spooler. Per  and -M, merging of verifiable information is preferred over deletion, so merge to print spooler is recommended
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: This is a standard feature of a print spooler.  It has nothing to do with dictionaries as our |policy makes clear.  If a banner tag has been there for seven years without result then it's the banner blindness|banner which is useless and which should be removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)