Deletion of List of female directors

Comment: see  - membership in the group itself is notable. There is no understanding that a person is notable '''purely''' for being a female director. I grant Roscelese that it may be notable for the more well-known female directors, but this list implies that anyone who just happens to be female and in charge of a movie is notable. Lastly, the fact there is no list for male directors demonstrates the clear un-needed nature of this new list. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTPEOPLE)

Comment: per .  That there are far fewer |notable female directors than male makes the topic |worthy of a list, and in this case, gender is THE fundemental and discriminating factor that sets this list apart.  And in NOT being indescriminate, this article meets the criteria at ... through PURP in being a valuable information source with internally linked terms. And important to remember, lists and categories are not interchangable and OTDUP|redundancy of lists and categories is beneficial |because the two work together in enlightening our readers.  And most important, lists are more readily navigable by readers, while categories are less navigable and cannot be edited directly to add or remove entries.  I agree that for the sake of clarity (unless this article is intended to later inlcude notable female theater directors), a rename to List of female film and television directors will better serve our readers.  And to the nominator, |arguments about what we do not have is a better reason to create content than to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:AOAL||WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:LIST||WP:LISTPURP||WP:NOTDUP||WP:CLN||WP:WAX)

Comment: per  and for the sake of egalitarianism. I consider this to be a very important stand
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:AOAL)