Deletion of Keymaker

Comment: To clarify, when you say the article fails , how did you determine this? I ask because two of your more recent nominations read as {{green|"FANDOM-level fancruft without a single reference, making it WP:ALLPLOT and WP:OR. '''Only lists a bunch of minor enemies. Therefore, fails '''."}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Static_enemies&oldid=984450176, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Static_supporting_characters&oldid=984450946). Not only is this a non-sequitor that doesn't reflect , but the bulk of the nominations were subjective declarations of importance, and not deletion criteria. The delete vote above is equally unconvincing for https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stan_Grossman&oldid=984742642 similar reasons
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTN)

Comment: The character is treated directly and in some detail in ''https://books.google.de/books?id=ETf0her6UDgC&pg=PA193&dq=%22key+maker%22+%22the+matrix%22&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjW37SwgcjsAhUUnVwKHY6aChkQ6AEwAHoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=key%20maker&f=false Jacking In To the Matrix Franchise: Cultural Reception and Interpretation'', ''https://books.google.de/books?id=qNGBDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT309&dq=key+maker+matrix&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAxZr-jMjsAhXEoFwKHXugDuQQ6AEwA3oECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=keymaker&f=false The Matrix of Hip-Pop/Rap over Black & White Culture'' and especially ''https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=VA6pAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA115&dq=keymaker+%22the+matrix%22&ots=YwSQnmOdim&sig=3cM55cm4l01ZkqdtSxIlGMmX1yY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=keymaker&f=false Detecting Detection: International Perspectives on the Uses of a Plot''. Those together satisfy . I am also not sure if the interviews are actually primary sources in this case, given that the movie is ''the'' primary source for the character. In addition, there are numerous sources which give us some character description, plot summary and small bits of analysis: https://books.google.de/books?id=385SDKrMdMoC&pg=PA355&dq=keymaker+%22the+matrix%22+movie&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjs9ovC_cfsAhUMT8AKHX28BlEQ6AEwA3oECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=key&f=false, https://books.google.de/books?id=DGZ8K4DPiwgC&pg=PA99&dq=keymaker+%22the+matrix%22+movie&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjs9ovC_cfsAhUMT8AKHX28BlEQ6AEwBXoECAAQAg#v=onepage&q=keymaker&f=false, https://books.google.de/books?id=Sl2WDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT142&dq=%22key+maker%22+%22the+matrix%22&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjW37SwgcjsAhUUnVwKHY6aChkQ6AEwBHoECAQQAg#v=onepage&q=%22key%20maker%22&f=false, https://books.google.de/books?id=Me7mDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT219&dq=schl%C3%BCsselmacher+matrix&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjX5ebTgsjsAhXE6eAKHUxaC8kQ6AEwAHoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=schl%C3%BCsselmacher&f=false, https://books.google.de/books?id=9On2DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT22&dq=schl%C3%BCsselmacher+matrix&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjX5ebTgsjsAhXE6eAKHUxaC8kQ6AEwBHoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=schl%C3%BCsselmacher&f=false, https://mediarep.org/handle/doc/4921, https://mediarep.org/handle/doc/4921. Lastly, the interviews provide some out-of-universe information on the character. Even if there were no other sources, I think it would be a loss, not a gain for Wikipedia to delete rather than preserve it in some way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as it obviously fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)