Deletion of SiFive

Comment: the company was reported to be the first to produce a chip that supports RISC-V ISA, as well as the first to support LINUX. I modified the article accordingly. There are also some other sources of coverage not yet integrated https://semiengineering.com/sifive-low-cost-custom-silicon/https://venturebeat.com/2017/05/08/sifive-raises-8-5-million-for-licensable-custom-microprocessors/http://www.eenewseurope.com/news/sifive-and-rambus-boost-designshare-silicon-economy are a few of the best. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I disagree that this article meets . There are no in-depth profiles of the company, no discussion of its impact on its industry or wider society. All of the references read like  news coverage of announcements to me, so I am not convinced this meets any notability bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: to RISC-V) per . Most of the coverage is about RISC-V and/or is (redressed) press releases. Sources from the Special:Permalink/805000964|article: Bloomberg: directory entry; AnandTech: not independent per last line; VentureBeat 1: indiscriminate/PR coverage; Cadence: no in-depth coverage of SiFive; VentureBeat 2: routine; Fossbytes: no in-depth coverage of SiFive; fudzilla: no in-depth coverage of SiFive. —&thinsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: into RISC-V (eg., by expanding the first bullet point under RISC-V#Commercially_available|Commercially available to 2 or 3 paragraphs). Technically, this article meets  and  but in both cases only barely, so I'm not convinced we need a separate article about the company. If SiFive does become a significant player in CPU design and/or manufacture, we can always recreate the article.I would say that right now the relevance of SiFive is that it (1) provides open-source implementations of RISC-V (an Open standard|open ISA) and (2) was founded by 3 of the guys from UCB who created RISC-V. That is, it currently is only important in relation to RISC-V and hence can and should be covered in that article. Cheers
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: This article meets  and . Furthermore, two subtantial articles with the reliable source VentureBeat
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)