Deletion of Bulgaria women's national under-23 volleyball team

Comment: If the VB Group was not able to come to a  consensus in the discussion you are citing, I'm confused as to why you think it's ok to delete these articles en masse. Taken on a case-by-case basis for notability guidelines such as  and conducting a thorough search that includes country and language context, this proposed mass deletion seems rather pointless IMO. Zero of the articles you are referencing as some kind of precedent are red links. Care to clarify
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: provisionally at least). No arguments have been provided in this nomination, other than that previous discussions were closed as delete. Despite claims to the contrary, this is precisely  ({{xt|We've deleted other articles in Category:Wikipedia articles about X, so this needs to go too.}}) and is therefore not nearly enough to delete dozens of articles. Nevertheless, at first I thought the original discussions probably had some more elaborate arguments for deletion, but sadly these are not any better ("this is the only existing under age national team article and template", "similar articles have been deleted so far", "we don't have such articles, others have been deleted", "Wikiproject Volleyball do not back the creation of under age national teams articles" - all completely invalid arguments). Perhaps the only "line of attack" against these articles is , assessed on an individual basis. I'm definitely not claiming here that any or all of these meet , and that's why my "keep" is provisional (i.e. on an individual basis and given proper arguments, I might say otherwise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:GNG)