Deletion of Francis E. Dec (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails , , and . A closer look at the references provided show that this article is crafted upon fan sites and primary source information compiled by those fan sites. In order to establish notability, a Wikipedia topic needs significant coverage in secondary reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I cannot find any sources on which to build an article that complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines regarding verifiability and sourcing. An argument could be made that an absence of those sources makes this OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Please examine the reasons given during the first AfD resulting in the original '''Keep''' consensus.  The article may fail  on several fronts, but it is such an entertaining, feverish masterwork of homage I'd hate to see it gone.  (I've copied it to one of my Sandbox pages in case it gets blown up).  Might I also add that, as a former Reverend of the Church of the SubGenius (in 1988, ordained by the Rev. Bob), I can attest that Dec has been a well-known fringe figure both in and out of the Church for decades.  Sadly, it's, um, the sources for this that are missing.  There are thousands of Wikipedia articles less sourced and more deserving of AfDs than this shrine.  Or maybe it's just .  Anyway, '''Keep'''. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ILIKEIT)