Deletion of Armdale Rotary

Comment: per nominator. I myself looked for sources and did not find any. That is why I did a failed |prod on this. Most of the article is thus unverifiable anyway. If being poorly designed and infamous to locals conferred notability, I could write several articles about intersections in my city
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)

Comment: Unclear why Andrew thinks a routine traffic engineering case study makes this notable - surely not http://conf.tac-atc.ca/english/resourcecentre/readingroom/conference/conf2010/english/papers_by_title.htm every concept presented on at a transportation conference automatically gets an article. This is neither a peer-reviewed article nor published in a journal so it is not a strong source for establishing notability. I do not see any sources that attest to this being anything other than one of the generic List of roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada|roundabouts and traffic circles in Canada. Simply absurd to claim that because we're not made of paper, anything and  must be kept perpetually; just because we can evaluate alternatives to deletion does not mean everything is immune from deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:EVERYTHING)