Deletion of Adept Press

Comment: as I don't see any coverage at all, much less |significant coverage. Sources are also lacking and it seems this company may be appropriate to talk about in a section of a different article but not have its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I just read the "Designers & Dragons" reference (Adept is covered in the 00s book) and it certainly looked extremely promising. There is an entire chapter entitled "Adept Press: 2001-Present" which extends from page 131 to 151 - but in reality the book only discusses Edwards and various games in depth, there is no substantive coverage of the company. It is a case really of  - while Edwards and the games are probably notable, the company fails to meet the criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per Guinness323 since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)