Deletion of Enochian magic

Comment: A short search gives several reliable-seeming sources, such as http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=LxCwyChmJrAC&pg=PA81&dq=%22Enochian+magic%22&ei=pBNGSvWMDKSUywTE4PlJ, http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cI4A2j5vVOMC&pg=PA222&dq=%22Enochian+magic%22&ei=pBNGSvWMDKSUywTE4PlJ and http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yJc2nCMYkWMC&pg=PA137&dq=%22Enochian+magic%22&ei=pBNGSvWMDKSUywTE4PlJ (the first two are by respectable authors, and the third by someone who http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/gerald-suster-728836.html seems to know what he's talking about even if he does have some strange beliefs) which indicate |notability by providing substantial coverage, and therefore justify a dedicated article to my mind. It's true that other articles (e.g. Enochian, Book of Enoch, John Dee - but perhaps you had others in mind) have better sourcing that could be used here too but that seems a reason for making use of those references and not for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)