Deletion of Natasha Collins (second nomination)

Comment: If all we are doing is regurgitating recent press reports, then let them be the first entry on a google search, not us. When there is enough material to warrant a full encyclopedic article on the subject, I will be happy to revise my opinion. Wikipedia does not have to include everything, and an instance like this was one of the reasons  was framed in the way it was. The consensus on Wikipedia at that time was that the subject of news reporting focussed on one event were not thought to be suitable subjects for an encyclopedic article unless their were exceptional circumstances.  A redirect to Mark Speight allows us to cover the event, inform our readers but not act as an obituary provider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: into Mark Speight per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Mark Speight.  She's yesterday's #NEWS|fish and chips wrapping.  Her very brief acting career doesn't represent a Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29#Entertainers|significant body of work.  The more recent coverage is due to her connection to Speight, not any inherent recognition; had she been living with an accountant, we wouldn't even be having this discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline|general notability guideline states thatA '''topic''' is ''presumed'' to be notable if it has received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject.The extensive media coverage of Natasha Collins in multiple reliable sources cited in Natasha_Collins#References clearly establishes a presumption of the notability of this person pursuant to the criteria established in the Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline|general notability guideline.  #NEWS has also been advanced as an argument for deletion. Whatever the merits of ever raising #NEWS in any deletion discussion without claiming serious  issues#NEWS was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not&diff=prev&oldid=134171531 added to  during the controversy surrounding the events considered in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Badlydrawnjeff, admonishes editors to "keep in mind the harm our work might cause", and advises that "While Wikipedia strives to be comprehensive, the policies on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view should lead us to contextualize events appropriately, which may preclude a biography about someone who is not an encyclopedic subject, despite a brief appearance in the news."  The extent to which #NEWS ''ever'' applies to ''any'' articles other than biographies of living persons that present a substantial risk of causing serious embarrassment, humiliation, or other harm to their subjects is therefore doubtful.  Archetypical of the sort of article that clearly qualifies for deletion under WP#NOT:NEWS would be a biography of a person whose sole claim to notability is an arrest for driving while intoxicated, where the event was only covered in two local newspapers., #NEWS clearly does not furnish a valid rationale for deletion here.  Indeed, #NEWS expressly states that "topics in the news may also be encyclopedic subjects when the sources are substantial"; the massive media coverage of Natasha Collins cited in Natasha_Collins#References would therefore suggest that this person is, indeed, an "encyclopedic subject".  The purely subjective assertions of non-notability advanced by editors supporting deletion of this article fail to outweigh the presumption of notability established via the Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline|general notability guideline through objective evidence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:BLP||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)