Deletion of Binarization of consensus partition matrices

Comment: This article is so opaque it is about as far as one can get from an encyclopaedia article for a general readership.  Even putting aside questions of notability and COI raised in the nomination, this still fails , particularly points #7 and #8
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTJOURNAL)

Comment: per . Much to technical and looks to just be a showcase for the journal article that proposed it without appropriate secondary coverage. If it ever gains attention in the academic community to satisfy GNG, those sources will put it in more encyclopedic terms for us anyways
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTJOURNAL)