Deletion of List of songs under one minute in length (2nd nomination)

Comment: strongly.  This nomination sets up a classic Catch 22: if a list has a clear, bright line criterion for inclusion or exclusion, that criterion can then be called "arbitrary", and its selection then becomes "original research" or "original synthesis"?   Of course, vaguer criteria are called "subjective" here.  If current trends continue, those policies will end up meaningless officialese, without any more meaning beyond .  This is a list of songs under a minute in length.  What original theory does it introduce?  How exactly is it "analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor"?To the extent that it needs references, reference to the recordings upon which they appear would seem to be sufficient; that isn't grounds for deletion.  Obviously the creator has put a lot of work into creating this page.  Please remember the Golden Rule, people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Unmaintainable list, arbitrary inclusion criteria, everything that Wikipedia is .  Specifically, this list fails as a list of loosely related topics, and there is no compelling reason to hang on to a list of songs just because they are of length X or less
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)