Deletion of Sovan Sarkar

Comment: irrespective of citations and h-index. The salient aspect here is that the subject is still a post-doc, the relevancy being that the work done in such positions is invariably carried-out under the close supervision of the lab director. In this sense, it is not his own independent work, even if his name is first on lots of papers (an aspect of the academic "authorship" culture) and even if those papers are highly cited. Rightly or wrongly, convention honors the lab PI here. It is likely this person ''will'' be notable for research results in the future if (1) he becomes independent (e.g. asst. prof.) ''and'' (2) if such results then continue to be produced. At present, I don't think we can conclude that  #1 is satisfied by someone that is still in a training position
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Citation record throws up an interesting issue. Subject has a GS h-index of 26 from papers in the field of autophagy. This would often be sufficient to pass rof#C1 even in the highly cited field of biomed. However, subject has been operating as a junior partner in some highly competent research groups with usually a large number of co-authors. There do not appear to be any single-author papers. It is therefore not clear if the subject yet demonstrated that he stands out from the crowd. There may be a case for oo soon|too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)