Deletion of Anthony Ulwick (second nomination)

Comment: You are right. There was no consensus on the last afd. I apologize for my error. General criteria for speedy deletion #4 provide for recreated deleted article. Whatever happened last time, this article still has to follow Wikipedia criteria of  and  and . It's hard to do that without adding outside links to multiple independent sources. It's very important for Wikipedia articles to meet these to be a credible source, as it aims to be. Add some links, why don't you? According to the link provided below, provided by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: as passing the Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work part of . His book ''What customers want'' seems to get him over the line. As it's passed AfD before as no consensus the nominator really needs to show why it now should be deleted rather than just renominating
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)