Deletion of Family tree of the Norse gods

Comment: per nom. This article is a steaming pile of unscholarly  and  that duplicates material handled in a scholarly and appropriate manner in  List of Germanic deities. Any specialist handling this chart would scoff at its premise given the problems inherent in the North Germanic corpus (and the Germanic corpus in general). All this list does is mislead the reader—it's outright misinformation. A family tree derived *solely* from the ''Prose Edda'' would be another matter but that would also be a totally different article. I would be glad to assist in such an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: I respect the nom's knowledge of mythology, but must respectfully disagree here. The idea that some Norse gods are kin is not in doubt. Indeed, List of Germanic deities through its ''Attested children'' column contains family trees in list form. Structurally, this is a well-formed list-class article with notable entries per . Family trees as a presentation format are officially supported via Wikipedia:Family trees. It is true that sources can disagree on family structure, but disagreement among RS is settled by giving a balanced presentation of the alternatives, not deleting whole articles. In this case, I have made a modest start by adding to the article: ''This family tree gives an example pedigree. With respect to kin relations of Norse gods, there are regional variations and disagreement among sources.'' A well formed list-class article that is sourced and can be fixed through normal editing suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL)