Deletion of Rice queen

Comment: Speedy keep ''A copy & paste nom deserves a copy & paste response.''  The concept of a "rice queen" is more than the definition of the term, so  doesn't apply.  |Notability is established and EO|neologism is denied by its commonplace usage within media and popular culture (~50,000 Google hits).  |Verifiability is Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Problem articles where deletion may not be needed|no reason to delete the article, and the prevalence of the concept outside the article denies allegations of |original research.  None of this information was difficult to come by, and the lack of due diligence in making this nomination concerns me.  Are you trying to |make a point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD||WP:N||WP:NEO||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:POINT)

Comment: I don't see how this article could be expanded beyobd dicdef.    may be the guiding principle here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WINAD)