Deletion of Dana Rogoz

Comment: per meeting , even if |discoverable sources are in Romainian. In looking at the just the first page of Google News we have significant coverage in http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/dana-rogoz-trece-granita-800203.html ''Evenimentul Zilei'' (2008)  http://www.realitatea.net/dana-rogoz-a-aniversat-25-de-ani-cu----tematica-sportiva_751656.html ''Realitatea'' (2012)  http://www.gds.ro/Actualitate/2006-07-16/Dana+Rogoz+si-a+petrecut+vacanta+in+Turcia ''Gazeta de Sud'' (2006) http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/dana-rogoz-zapacita-in-telenovela-820647.html ''Evenimentul Zilei'' (2008) http://www.gandul.info/magazin/dana-rogoz-prezentatoare-la-protv-international-2375318 ''Gândul'' (2008) http://www.egirl.ro/stiri/mondene/Dana-Rogoz-De-Craciun-GATESC-curcan-la-cuptor-s2009122317.html ''Egirl'' (2009) http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/dragos-bucurenci-si-dana-rogoz-voluntari-cu-traditie-953629.html ''Evenimentul Zilei'' (2011)  http://www.evz.ro/detalii/stiri/dana-rogoz-aventuri-in-bulgaria-3040.html ''Evenimentul Zilei'' (2008)  http://www.realitatea.net/cabral-se-insoara-cu-dana-rogoz_781115.html ''Realitatea'' (2012) and http://www.showbiz.ro/vedete/dana-rogoz-7929267 ''Showbiz'' (2011) and there are many more pages. Yes, the article's |current state is rough, but |notability is dependent upon coverage and not upon source usage, and addressable issues such as needing more use of |found sourcing is |a fixable issue not requiring deletion when we have someone arguable as notable to Romania. That makes this a "keep and fix".   And to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NONENG||WP:UGLY||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: As it currently exists, article has only 1 reference. Not |WP:NOTABLE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)