Deletion of Jake Kalish

Comment: On second thought, this nomination seems a bit -y and I'm going to withdraw it. Although I do feel he's not notable now, I think having this discussion only to recreate the article in a few weeks, is pointless. If Kalish gets hurt or something and misses the Classic, we can revisit this later. Am I allowed to close this discussion myself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: As the page creator I did so based on . Number 3 states playing in a game for a league or participating in a tournament. To me the distinction between playing and participating is there for a reason. If the intent was they had to actually play in the game then NBASE would say play in the WBC, but it does not. Therefore I make the argument that by being named to a roster he has done some level of participation in the tournament. His name is being used in the press and there could be other items which happen prior to March. Additionally this just seems like a silly nomination because even with his arguments he will be notable in 5.5 weeks, however I disagree and feel he meets them now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBASE)