Deletion of Emily Critchley

Comment: I don't see the coverage necessary to show notability, though it's always possible I'm missing something. COI doesn't doom an article like this, if you can find sources (independent of the subject), but that doesn't appear to be the case here. |Usual Caveats apply, however; if she publishes something that gains significant coverage, an article might end up being appropriate. But not yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Usual caveats (WP:USUAL)

Comment: Does not rate a single cite on GS so fails rof. What about poetry
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: based on her great volume of published work. This individual fails , but I want to point out that it's fairly difficult for even highly published poets to achieve the notability guidelines and it might not be a bad idea to establish some specifically for this purpose.  anyone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:POET)