Deletion of Extreme Transaction Processing

Comment: per ,  I would not oppose a selective merge of the sources, then deletion outright. No use in a redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:FORK)

Comment: or '''Merge''': Yes it is a useless  of Transaction processing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: to Transaction_processing#Implementations, where it is already mentioned. I agree that there isn't in-depth sourcing sufficient to meet GNG and associated underlying technologies, such write-back caching, are covered elsewhere. 82 hits in GScholar and book hits, including an O'Reilly texthttps://books.google.com/books?id=f7AhpRiA8NYC&pg=PA55&dq=%22Extreme+Transaction+Processing%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjH_ab14vTqAhXzNX0KHW79CDcQ6AEwB3oECAkQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Extreme%20Transaction%20Processing%22%20-wikipedia&f=false show that the concept of XTP exists in the literature, however, and it is a plausible search term. Hence, per -R, redirect is a reasonable alternative to deletion. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)