Deletion of Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins

Comment: There is a lot of good information in this article. But the WP policy on list-based articles like this is that the entries on the list should be notable according to, e.g., , and should ideally be subjects of articles themselves. In this article, all the entries appear to be cited with external links. It would be a worthy project to go through these and figure out which add-ins are in fact notable, but as it stands there is no demonstrated notability. This article would be a good candidate for Wikipedia:Userfication|userfication for further development without the threat of deletion; alas I don't have the time to take it on myself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as an good candidate for  - also as I read  it is intended for simpler lists, and the notability requirement for list items is sensible to avoid indiscriminate addition of, for example, people, theories etc. This article contains more verfiable encyclopaedic content than that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:LIST)

Comment: per  - no one wants to delete this article, and there's no need to do it "because the rules say so" - we have a rule that say we don't have to. Another option is to merge the table into Decision-making_software where the requirement of notability won't destroy the encyclopedic, verifiable content;  agrees with this outcome
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: The subject is obscure to some, but the article is well-sourced and therefore meets  (although the merge proposed above wouldn't make the destination article too long
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)