Deletion of Halvad railway station

Comment: Relevant policy here would be  (infrastructure). There's also the essay, . All of which basically sums to "go with ". I am unqualified to judge notability here, but at the very least this should be a redirect to Viramgam–Maliya Miyana section or some other suitable article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILD||WP:STATION||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:CONSENSUS|Consensus, which is the primary deciding policy, wisely decided long ago that all rail stations are notable.  This way thousands of editors don't waste time and energy fleshing out and debating the retention of articles on the tens of thousands of stations when editors efforts are much better spent on creating new articles and improving existing ones.  For this and most stations, it's impossible for in depth coverage like extensive government reports and budgets to not exist.  An article for such a station serving a town of over 60,000 (which this one does) in the UK or US would never even be considered for deletion even if there was zero coverage in the article.  Is this a case of |systemic bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)