Deletion of David A. Booth

Comment: The text of the article makes it sound like he should be eligible under  criteria #1, but the sources all go to the research he is claimed to be notable for, not any independent sources confirming that he is in fact notable. If the claims already in the article could be properly sourced, I would withdraw my weak delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Google Scholar citations appear to be enough to meet  criterion 1, while the http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=206131&sectioncode=26 article concerning him in the ''Times Higher Education'' is an independent, reliable source to back up the non-independent but reasonably realiable biographical details in his personal webpage and ensure an article about him can be |verifiable. Also appears to meet  criterion 3 as his http://books.google.com/books?id=xH2LXR1wiagC 1994 monograph ''Psychology of Nutrition'' was the subject of independent reviews in several reputable academic journals: http://www.ajcn.org/content/62/2.toc ''American Journal of Clinical Nutrition'', http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.1995.tb00592.x ''Nutrition Bulletin'', http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(96)00905-6 ''Patient Education and Counselling''. The last of these says "The author ... is an expert on the regulation of appetite and satiety and writes with great authority on this subject." I agree with Carrite's and MelanieN's criticisms of some of the content of the current article though, so suggest removing the sentence about PubMed and tagging with {{tl|cleanup-jargon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:V||WP:AUTHOR)