Deletion of Rue La La

Comment: I think that these sources that are currently cited are sufficiently independent of the company that they do establish : http://finance.yahoo.com/news/flash-sales-not-a-flash-in-the-pan-says-rue-la-la-ceo-202125863.html, https://www.boston.com/jobs/jobs-news/2016/02/25/a-look-inside-rue-la-la-cool-seaport-office, and https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/08/12/rue-searches-for-funding-flash-sales-sector-transition/OS0jWcYXxAh2MhScGIx5yL/story.html. I looked and also found http://www.retailtouchpoints.com/features/retail-success-stories/rue-la-la-eliminates-data-silos-to-kickstart-email-personalization and https://www.thestreet.com/story/13728155/1/rue-la-la-and-nbcs-access-hollywood-ink-partnership.html. I think that all of these sources satisfy the criteria at . Taken together, I think that this is enough to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: the promotionalism outweighs any marginal notability the subject may or may not have. The sources above are not convincing for notability -- they are either trade press, or local to the business, such as "A look at Rue La La's Cool Office" or "Rue La La is Looking for Funding". Neither types meets  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:CORPDEPTH)