Deletion of Gerri Ratliff

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better. The role she was appointed to is not an "inherently" notable one under , so she isn't automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because she has a job — her includability would come down to getting her over  on the ''sourcing'', but the sources here aren't cutting it: three of the five footnotes are |primary sources self-published by her own employers, which are not support for notability, and both of the other two just briefly namecheck her as a giver of soundbite in articles that aren't ''about'' her, which is not support for notability either. As I noted above, people do not attain notability by getting ''quoted'' in coverage of other ''things'', they attain notability by being the ''subject'' that ''other'' people are talking or writing ''about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: as director of the Community Relations Service, a significant DOJ department. Also, I don't see how  applies here, given that she's not a politician or judge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)