Deletion of Anne Logston (2nd nomination)

Comment: http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?2856 ISFDB shows two published reviews for ''Guardian's Key'', one for ''Exile'', two for ''Dagger's Edge'', two for ''Dagger's Point'', two for ''Shadow'', one for ''Shadow Dance'', two for ''Greendaughter'', one for ''Wild Blood'', one for ''Firewalk'', and one for ''Waterdance'', for a total of 15 reviews of 10 of her books. That's plenty for . They would have all been in print magazines in the 1990s, so not likely available online, but sources don't need to be online for them to demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: i am swaying here, one point of  requires reviews of their works and for them to be "significant or well-known", although there are plenty of reviews available from |"good" sources (see Internet Speculative Fiction Database|ISFDB http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?2856 listing here) - click on individual titles and reviews are listed (there are reviews in addition to those mentioned by {{u|DiamondRemley39}} above) - i note that 5 of the titles have 2 reviews listed that technically meet  ie. multiple reviews, and depending on which books are reviewed in ''Kliatt'', and ''VOYA'' mentioned above may mean that more of her books are wikinotable/articleworthy, a concern is that they may be deemed not well known ie. library holdings (acknowledging that the figures may not be uptodate) are in the low double figures (highest found: ''Dagger's  Edge'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/daggers-edge/oclc/834977018&referer=brief_results 34 libraries, ''Waterdance'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/waterdance/oclc/423044710&referer=brief_results 27 libraries, ''Shadow'' https://www.worldcat.org/title/shadow/oclc/939468051&referer=brief_results 24 libraries), but with Logston being covered by ''Encyc Fantasy'' and ''A to Z Fant Lit'' i am feeling "keepish
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:RS||WP:NBOOK)