Deletion of The Everlasting Hatred: The Roots of Jihad (2nd nomination)

Comment: no  to expand the article with. All the GNews hits are either unrelated or consist of articles written by the author of the book. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22the+everlasting+hatred%22+&hl=en&ned=us
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: without prejudice for recreation if notability can be definitively established as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: albeit weakly.  As a Christian, Hal Lindsey's dispensationalism|opinions about prophecy strike me as not only wrong, but evil: he's beating the drums for the State of Israel because he hopes Arab-Israeli conflict will force God's hand and bring Armageddon, and thus the Second Coming, sooner.   But he is a major, major figure in publicizing this belief system, and as such falls under  criterion 5: "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable, even in the absence of secondary sources."  The book has also attracted notice outside the right-wing dispensational Christian market, and even attracted the notice of the Council on Foreign Relationshttp://www.foreignaffairs.org/20041101fabook83634b/hal-lindsey/the-everlasting-hatred-the-roots-of-jihad.html. I am sure that further reviews can be had in Christian publications.  It grieves my heart that there are people capable of swallowing Lindsey's evil malarkey, but it is a notable book by a notable author
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: per cab. I do not agree with the assertion that this author fits under criterion 5 of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)