Deletion of List of traps in the Saw film series (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom. Unencyclopedic cruft and |excessive plot detail. Good films, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: as mere plot detail.  Plot detail is supposed to ''complement'' a topic per , not serve ''as'' the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: Fancruft.  Not covered in reliable sources.  Just because it can't be merged into the film or the fim series doesn't mean we need an article on it.  The article consists of  and  information almost entirely.  Links to photos on EBAY as sources???  Links to Photobucket shots of the script as sources????  How did this survive AfD before?  I '''''strongly''''' suggest that the closing admin ''look at the article'' prior to closing this if there is even a hint that it might be closed as "no consensus, default to keep".  There isn't a single reliable source posted.  Not even to reviews of the movie.  Doesn't belong on wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:PLOT)