Deletion of AtTask

Comment: it isn't advertising ''per se'', but the external sources don't seem sufficient to prove notability per . However, the fact that independent third-party sources exist means it may have a claim to notability, although this isn't clear at the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: as this company does fit the notability criteria per .  I am the editor who added the references. AtTask has been covered by several third parties, however I had trouble finding all of them online.  In addition, the two that JzG says are "evidently based on press releases" aren't press releases, and weren't issued by the company itself, so I don't see how they should be excluded per the source criteria in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CORP)