Deletion of WeeChat (2nd nomination)

Comment: another IRC client article that fails  by not having "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".  (The cited sources are just websites servicing the software, and don't constitute either "significant", "reliable" or "independent".)  IRC Clients are not inherently notable and Wikipedia should not be a directory of every IRC client ever created - just the extraodinary ones
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I still feel we should delete as per my argument above.  Sources establish a rebuttal resumption of notability under , they're not the final arbiter of it.  They need to be backed up by an assertion of notability - that is, a claim that the subject of the article is in some way of interest and importance to a level deserving encylopaedic coverage - and no such assertion is made in the article.  Plainly IRC clients cannot be inherently notable and there's nothing asserting that this piece of software is more notable than IRC clients generally
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)