Deletion of Sharifa Love-Rutledge

Comment: Nowhere near passing rof. Maybe in 10 or 20 years time. Not enough for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: Only assistant prof - I'd be looking for a named chair or "Distinguished Professor" appointment. Please see . First black women to gain a PhD in a particular department at a particular uni isn't overly notable to me (though is certainly an achievement), first in the uni overall maybe would be. Publishing citation record is not particularly impressive, especially when just considering the first or last author papers. So it falls to how notable the awards are, and to me they mostly look like academic scholarships and minor awards. It needs more than a passing mention in something published other than the winner's institution or the awarding institution. Either of those might prove it was real, but doesn't show it's notability. Winning a national-level award also won by many others doesn't make it prestigious. Most of the awards don't have their own wikipages I assume. To me, "substantial impact" needs to be much more than a one-time incorporation into an organisation's guidelines. Much as I don't like to for any women scientist, I'll have to say delete at this time, as it's  really
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Lots of Wikipedia:Wikipuffery but no evidence of significant academic accomplishments of the type needed to pass  (multiple heavily cited publications, distinguished professor rank, etc). The only thing that stands out as an unusual level of attention is the name-drop in "100 inspiring black scientists in America" but that's only a name-drop on what is essentially a forum posting, not the sort of reliably-published in-depth coverage needed for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)