Deletion of Brenton Lengel

Comment: The subject in this article is covered by multiple reliable sources  Therefore the subject passes  and the nominator has an admitted COI
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article subject in this article is covered significantly in numerous and multiple reliable sources  including local and national coverage. Therefore the subject easily passes  and should be retained as an article on wikipedia. The threshold of notability has been crossed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article itself cites multiple international sources including Salon, The New York Times and Al Jazeera. The subject unambiguously meets the criteria in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While the article cites many good sources, for the ones I checked, they only are | tangentially about him or don't even mention him at all, but rather about |people who he's worked with or things he's done. His play verifiably is not the first work of drama about the AT. {{Citation needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: The sources in the article are of three types: trivial mentions, non-reliable, or non-independent. Searches did not turn up anywhere near the coverage needed to pass  (News - 1 trivial mention; Highbeam, Newspapers, and Scholar - Zip; a couple of trivial mentions on Books). In addition, what brought me to this particular AfD discussion is that one of the folks who is !voting keep has begun to canvass for other keep !votes. While checking out a talk page of someone on my watchlist, I came across their request to come here to try to save the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)