Deletion of William Natbony

Comment: non-notable. Being quoted by Forbed isn't proof of notability: that would require the article be able him (for example). To pass , he'd need multiple non-trivial reliable sources. Being quoted is a good example of a trivial mention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I've been through the http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22william+natbony%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=uk&sa=N&start=20 Gnews hits and don't see anything there that amounts to ''substantial'' coverage. He is certainly http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-skunk-shakes-up-the-sec-and-hedge-fund-world?pagenumber=2 quoted http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/18/amaranth-motherrock-funds-biz_cx_tvr_0919hedgefunds.html several times, but as Bfigura says these are textbook "trivial" mentions, and other http://www.thestreet.com/markets/matthewgoldstein/10108288.html single-sentence http://www.thelawyer.com/katten-muchin-and-mw-cornish-tie-the-knot/115855.article references don't, I think, carry enough weight individually or jointly to meet the |notability criteria. Weirdly it looks like he has a better shot at notability in a former incarnation as a http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00E16F63E54157493C6AB178BD95F4C8685F9 junior chess http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20D12F93B5C1A7A93C2AA178FD85F408785F9 and bridge champion, assuming it's the same guy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)