Deletion of Halifax child sex abuse ring

Comment: Per . The article is references. BLP objection is just wrong
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Crime is clearly notable per , with extremely wide coverage of the events in national and international and political discourse around them (e.g. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/naz-shah-sarah-champion-child-abuse-pakistani-labour-newcastle-rotherham-bradford-a7890216.html). BLPCRIME is hardly an issue as the perps currently are not named in our article - though they definitely could be seeing that they were convicted. Per BLPCRIME we should presume non-known perps as innocent until proven guilty in a court of law - and they were convicted in this case. BLPCRIME does not negate NCRIME, though it is at time an issue - in any case this argument is completely irrelevant here. It might be worthwhile to rename the article to something that contains '''Calderdale''' - e.g. Calderdale grooming gang or Calderdale gang per usage in http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-36559092 Calderdale gang jailed for grooming and abusing girls, BBC and elsewhere
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom - I see a lot of discussion about national/international coverage but {{tq|such coverage should not be the sole basis for creating an article}} per . The most important issue is, what is the lasting effect or significance of this? Based on the sources, I don't see anything supporting lasting effect or historical significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)

Comment: Meets .  The BLP objection is quite absurd.  The suspects were tried, found guilty, and their biographic data published by the courts and subsequently by the .  By the standard raised that child abuse convictions with names should not appear on WP, you may as well delete the Roman_Polanski_sexual_abuse_case|Roman Polanski child rape, as clearly he was never convicted (he merely left the United States
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: None of the keep voters have even attempted to address the glaring issues with  and ; sure, you can pretend they don't exist but it makes for a particular weak !vote. '''Closing admin''': remember GNG, a guideline, ''does not'' supersede  and WP:BLP, both policies, and since this is not a ballot the outcome of this AFD should be much more obvious than you would expect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BLPCRIME)