Deletion of Bob Corlew

Comment: Neither being an unsuccessful candidate in a party primary nor being a county court judge constitutes an article-clinching notability claim, but this makes no credible claim that he's somehow a special case over and above all the other non-notable people who've done the same things. The closest thing to such a claim, that one court case he was involved in got wider national coverage than usual, is clobbered by the fact that said coverage is not ''about him'' — that coverage might support an ''event'' article about the ''case'', but it does ''not'' help the case's presiding judge earn a  as a ''person''. And since both primary candidates and county court judges are simply and routinely ''expected'' to receive some local coverage in their own local media, the existence of some such coverage is not an automatic  pass in and of itself either. All of which means that nothing here is enough to earn him a Wikipedia article — and furthermore, the article was created by a sockpuppet of a banned paid-editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  no notable election won or posts held. Sources covering are weak. Also agree with the contributors above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: fails  and . Per the Lions Club argument, there's some local coverage, a decent local bio, and a few name-drops where the Lions Club acted in local regions, but none of the recent other Lions Club presidents have an article (it's a year term apparently) and I don't see enough coverage that would make him independently notable as the Lions Club president
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)