Deletion of Socialist (insult)

Comment: or '''Merge''' with Red-baiting. From looking over the (huge amount of) sources looks like a minor case of  and possibly . Most political designations can be used as an insult by a differing factor or someone wanting to miscategorise the other's views. Agree with the above comment that this does not have the same notability as Fascist (insult). The article is trying to cover 'communist' and 'marxist' (in some sources) as an insult so a merge with red-baiting makes sense. I don't really support redirecting as no articles link to this page and it is highly unlikely someone would search for this exact term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:REFBOMBING)

Comment: The title needs work but the sources indicate that there's a substantial topic here.  The scope of the article includes other similar words like "communist" and this is not just a US "red scare" thing – I noticed in recent news coverage that the Taliban execute communists out of hand.  This is a new article and applicable policies include , , , , 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:BITE||WP:CENSOR||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: per . Any word can be an insult when you really think about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTEVERYTHING)