Deletion of Robert Earl Hughes

Comment: per Cunard. There are significant sources to establish notability, in line with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Give me a break.  Like Robert Wadlow, he's well-known to anyone who ever picked up the Guinness book, which a lot of people ''do'' tend to think of as a "reliable" reference work.  A news search http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22robert+earl+hughes%22&btnG=Search+Archives&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a suggests that he was notable in the 1940s and the 1950s and the 1960s and the 1970s and the 1980s and the 1990s and the 2000s etc. etc.  We don't vote on whether he "ought to be" notable.   for this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Clearly notable. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)