Deletion of Kani Kusruti

Comment: agree that inpart the article is too promotional but don't think it is bad enough for TNT, the promo parts can be edited out. There is reliable coverage such as the Hindu http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/Living-in-the-moment/article13986296.ece here, Manorama http://www.manoramaonline.com/women/work-and-life/kani-kusruti.html here, a short piece in Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/Kani-Kusruti-essays-another-unusual-role/articleshow/55412699.cms here, and controversy reported in the Asianet News http://newsable.asianetnews.tv/entertainment/watch-actress-kani-kusrutis-talks-about-sex-in-a-film here, there seems to be enough for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: She is a notable person. There are many reliable coverage like Times of India http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/Living-in-the-moment/article13986296.ece here,The Hindu http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/news/Kani-Kusruti-in-Pisasu/articleshow/45191228.cms here, Asianet News http://newsable.asianetnews.tv/entertainment/watch-actress-kani-kusrutis-talks-about-sex-in-a-film here, Deccanchronicle http://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/viral-and-trending/151116/exploring-sexuality-on-screen.html here,Manoramaonline http://www.manoramaonline.com/women/work-and-life/kani-kusruti.html here are these. Page is well written too. there seems to be enough for  Ayyappan CS   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)