Deletion of Mika McKinnon

Comment: Quite apart from her substantial impact as a journalist, technical advisor, and communicator, she's been profiled by at least four independent sources (and I just added a fifth). These sort of spurious (and anonymous) notability challenges seem to be ignoring , the basic criterion of significant coverage in reliable sources, something she obviously meets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: None of the clear-cut reasons for deletion apply here: not |one event fame, nor |self-promoting, nor |gossipy.  The article's tone is calm and it is unsensational and well-sourced.  The notability standard is very subjective and it makes sense to err on the side of inclusion.  More relevant is that this is exactly the kind of article I'd hope to find when looking for background on an author, investigator, or speaker
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NOTSCANDAL)