Deletion of Special Strong

Comment: passes  and  as per indepth coverage in reputable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG)

Comment: Passes  as per available overall coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: creation of SPA, remarkable WP page creation skills for a brand new account. Sourcing does not pass , overlinked mess. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: As per having coverage in multiple sources and major news TV channels this article should qualify for . I think this company has been the subject of enough independent and reliable sources like The Dallas Morning News, GoodNewsNetwork, ABC News|ABC, NBC, Fox News, Channel 24 and many others which can surely warrant notability, please see the source table below for the same
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: It has significant coverage and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Advertisement of a Fitness company. References do not show notability of the subject. Routine coverage and PR. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: reliable source"  and "in-depth coverage" is two out of three - people always tend to try to ignore  and the fact that all the information is provided by the company (in a glowingly positive way, hence the term "advertorial"). Same as the CityLifeStyle article https://issuu.com/lifestylepubs/docs/mckinney___prosper_2021_1_print originally published in McKinney & Prosper - once you see it in the original magazine, you'll see it as an advertorial also. The entire magazine is one big bunch of ads. You need to examine very closely those times when the CEO is being interviewed or there are mentions of the company and ask - who is providing the information. To pass ORGIND, it can't originate from the company/CEO/founder/executive and be published - the reference requires independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of those links provide that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Per above, passes  has indepth coverage in many sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)