Deletion of Next Eleven

Comment: As said above. The coverage is really insignificant in terms of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Jim O'Neill, Baron O'Neill of Gatley#Next Eleven. A hypothetical group that lack in/depth |significant coverage ''as'' a group. Given the fact that the group is about 11 nations, it is bound have a little attention in RS. But in the current state, it is not enough to assert the firm notability. —usernamekiran
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I think your concerns are valid, but I think there's enough study of the group that it passes |GNG. In particular there are several academic papers and reports which study characteristics of the economies as a group: http://www.uoguelph.ca/catprn/PDF-WP/CATPRN-WP_2012-03_Cairns-Meilke.pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988314000577 https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73395/1/MPRA_paper_73395.pdf https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/6010625 http://eebej.eu/2016v2n1/2-26.pdf. I agree O'Neill could probably stand to cool it with all the new country groups, but this one seems to have gotten enough traction to keep. If it isn't a keep, it should redirect to O'Neill
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)