Deletion of Andre Nickatina (2nd nomination)

Comment: as article creator. I defend my decision under criterion #1 of the ''WP:MUSIC'' page that states that the musician must have "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable". ''SF Weekly'' and ''Metro Silicon Valley'' do qualify as reliable sources because they both contain extensive editorial overview boards and are ''not'' |self-published. As far as the depth of coverage goes, Nickatina was given a http://www.sfweekly.com/2003-12-03/music/money-power-day-care/print full article about him on ''SF Weekly'' back in 2003, and there are also some published reviews in ''SF Weekly'' and ''Metro Silicon Valley'' about a few of his albums. I think those sources should be enough to qualify as "multiple" works. What makes those local publications ''un''-reliable though? I provided links to the Nickatina sources to the user who "salted" the Nickatina titled
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS)

Comment: The coverage in ''SF Weekly'' and ''Metro'' appears to pass #1. The version I speedy deleted was much more minimal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Even if they aren't necessarily the largest of publications, those two definitely appear to be non-trivial sources independent of the subject, hence satisfying 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: The sources in the article seem to meet , such as the SF Weekly link and the All Music Guide profile (whose link I fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)