Deletion of Martina Del Bonta

Comment: The fact that Dr. McGuire finds Del Bonta to be suitable speaker to his graduate course is hardly a sign of |notability. MrDel is advised to read the Wikipedia criteria for inclusion more carefully
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: No newspaper or other Reliable Source seems to have taken note of her. Literally none http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22martina+del+bonta%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives. MrDel, please understand that Wikipedia has a very precise definition of "notable" which you can read |HERE. It requires that independent, reliable sources have provided significant coverage about the person. It's not a value judgment on her, or a criticism of her career; it's just a reflection of what has (or hasn't) been said about her by independent sources. I know this can be frustrating to new users, but Wikipedia has to have standards. Regardless of what happens with this nomination, please do stick around and continue to contribute to articles about which you have an interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I've done a few searches and have to disagree with MrDel. Subject is not notable enough for Wikipedia yet. See  which gives the criteria for journalists - the only feasible one would be: "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors" which has not been demonstrated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)