Deletion of RockWay Press

Comment: per all above... regardless of whether this is an attack page, there is still no evidence that this press meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I can't help thinking that you are being  alittle obsessive about this. At the end of the day we keep or delete this article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and not by the amount of energy that the discusion generates. How about you read  to see the standards that are expected for a notable internet site. Since its a company you could also see .  is an excellent read. The article is unencyclopedic and as I said earlier  a consumer protection site. Please try to calm down a frame your arguments in the context of the policies I have listed for you. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:CORP||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:NOT)

Comment: too complex to be called a vote). ''If'' "Preditors and Editors" deserves an article (which it may very well), and "RockWay Press" deserves mention there, then redirect.  ''If'' "Preditors and Editors" qualifies as a |reliable source, then keep only those paragraphs sourced there.  Otherwise, delete under  as it relates to Alexandria/Sherri Szeman.  &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:LIVING)

Comment: Reiterating, '''delete''' under  unless the allegations and the analysis are sourced.  I think you've done a reasonably good job of sourcing the allegations, but not the analysis.  &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:LIVING)

Comment: The truer it is the less notable is the subject. . What's left seems to still be an attack page. Too bad it was not speedied
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: regardless of whether Rockway press is scam or not, it doesn't seem to meet  anyways
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: In which case properly source your article rather than leaving people to go and look for it themselves. There are no proper sources shown on the article. See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)