Deletion of Turkish Regional Amateur League

Comment: I agree with Number 57 that  is just an essay. However, the article in its current state reference-wise doesn't satisfy , which I think is the main issue. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN||WP:N)

Comment: Clearly notable as per /. There are enough reliable sources with regards to the topic to warrant keeping the article, see Phil Bridger's comment. Also, the nom stating that this league does not meet  is wrong since the article clearly meets . We are talking about the league here, not the clubs involved or the players involved! Straighforward KEEP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:FOOTYN||WP:N)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The clubs themselves may not be notable, and certainly not the players, but it seems to me rather bizarre that a fifth level league in a country where football is as important as Turkey could be deemed not notable. And http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22B%C3%B6lgesel+Amat%C3%B6r+Lig%22&oq=%22B%C3%B6lgesel+Amat%C3%B6r+Lig%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=559l1234l0l1551l3l3l0l0l0l0l373l373l3-1l1l0&gs_l=hp.3...559l1234l0l1551l3l3l0l0l0l0l373l373l3-1l1l0.frgbld.&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=ff1f6c0d1565f33e&biw=1152&bih=751 169,000 Ghits suggest this is the case. Plus  is not a valid reason for deleting as it's an essay and has never been accepted as a policy or guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: I think, as the fifth tier football league in Turkey, it satisfies  and the article can be improved more. Besides, I added League Status and two references from Turkish major news websites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)