Deletion of The Music of Ooo

Comment: album-related info to Adventure Time#Related media, where perhaps a new sub-section could be created. While the nominator's introductory rationale for ''this'' AfD is a not very useful copy/paste from elsewhere, he/she actually made a better point in the later comment about how much of this album article and its sources are about other things. The article is bloated with |fancruft about the show itself, while the album received little coverage as a stand-alone entity in its own right. However, there is some useful information on how the show's producers created and compiled songs throughout the show's lengthy history, and that can be discussed at the show's article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: into Adventure Time. First, a note on process: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. I understand that you may feel the aforementioned bundled nom deserved to be treated en masse, but if others have any reason to disagree, then it isn't a good case for bundling. Precedent is made one AfD at a time, which can then be referenced in later discussions. That's simply a matter of procedure. But to the point here, this article topic lacks |significant coverage in multiple |reliable, |independent sources (|?) and no one has raised additional sources. The standard course of action is to first attempt an |alternative to deletion such as -R|bold redirection. If/when that's contested, there are other ways to handle, but outright deletion of an album connected to a media property will rarely make sense because the title will almost always remain a viable search term worthy of redirection. So minimally merge any worthwhile sourcing in this case and redirect the title when ready. I would think that the parent featured article should have at least some mention of this release. (not Help:Watchlist|watching, please {{tl|ping
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:ATD||WP:ATD)