Deletion of ArtFacts.Net

Comment: too promotional to be worth keeping. Notability is marginal at best; sources do not meet  / . Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle for unremarkable businesses
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Probably keep, but with a sharp eye:  may be of concern here and at the related article, and lest they be tended as press releases, there are reliable sources that may be added such as http://www.npr.org/sections/nprberlinblog/2012/05/24/153633324/artfacts-net-the-methodology-and-controversy-of-marek-claasson. Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:11F0:41E8:3E22:766:8808|2601:188:180:11F0:41E8:3E22:766:8808
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: None of the sources or references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The sources either fail  or . The source posted above by the anon IPV6 address is to a blog post. Blog posts are not acceptable sources for establishing notability. The source posted above by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)