Deletion of List of zombie novels

Comment: due to active improvements; I'd like to see where they can go further.  In any event, the article now contains about a dozen references, and |non=notable is too subjective of a term to count toward deletion.  Good job getting the ball rolling!  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN)

Comment: Nominator made no effort to attempt to fix this article, violating  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: It strikes me that the nominator's concerns are being addressed, the article IS being 'pruned' and improved even while it is being discussed here, and multiples of multiple sources exist that show notability.  Per  the article serves to improve the project by remaining and continuing to be improved. Growth is the purpose of Wikipedia... and not its bane
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: as fundamentally opposed to what an encyclopedia is for -- we are  for indiscriminate collections of information. Much of the content isn't even novels. It's just a random collection of trivia and used as a place for people to promote nonnotable books. People who want this kind of information should go to Wikia or a fanlisting site instead of here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is should not be not a card catalog. |Wikipedia is not a directory of related reading materials. When a list becomes quite long and has vague criteria, it becomes |indiscriminate. |Wikipedia is not a collection of pointers to external works
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTLINK)

Comment: nominators only argument is that it is unsourced, which is a non-argument, because these books can be sourced, those that cannot can easily be prunned.  Nominator made no effort to attempt to fix this article, violating  and . "Wikipedia is not a card catalog" is a non-existent policy. RE: Wikipedia is not a directory, some of the best articles on wikipedia, featured articles are lists. Vague criteria? Pretty specific: zombie novels, how much more specific does anyone need
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I have begun to remove all of the books which do not have sources, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_zombie_novels&diff=312156593&oldid=312149350 something that the nominator never did, per  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)