Deletion of Making an entrance (2nd nomination)

Comment: The topic is notable; for example see ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=NkYsNNG2insC&pg=PA69 Shakespeare's Stagecraft''.  |AFD is not cleanup.  Exit, stage left
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Well, we don't keep articles based on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: or kill off all the .  I agree with almost everything said above--it's only a question of how best to fix the obvious problem.   I agree with {{u|AdventurousSquirrel}} that the title might be a major problem, and I agree with those above who say the subject has significance in terms of movie (http://www.filmsite.org/entrances.html famous film entrances, http://screenrant.com/best-movie-entrances-all-time/?view=all), theater (noting {{u|Andrew Davidson}}'s comment), interviews, teaching, psychology https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201403/eight-ways-make-grand-entrance, etc.  I just don't see anything in the article worth saving, except maybe the first few lines, which are unfortunately, unreferenced.  The article is so bad and lacking of , almost everything needs to go.  I would be happy to see it resurrected if something more worthwhile with  is created, but what we have I can't support without at least some quality  to back it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS)