Deletion of Espresso Vivace

Comment: Upon consideration, meets  and  per a review of available sources, and also retain per . The article has been significantly expanded after this discussion was initiated (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Espresso_Vivace&diff=810686627&oldid=809993271 diff), and concerns regarding promotional tone can be addressed by |copy editing the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUD||WP:HEY||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: I have searched for references that meet the criteria for establishing notability and to date, I have not found any article that is "intellectually independent". Invariably the references either talk about the founder, Schomer, which this article is *not* about, or the references rely on interviews with Schomer. For those that have expressed a KEEP !vote, can you please provide links to any two articles that meet the criteria for establishing notability and meet the criteria in  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Thank you to {{u|Dennis_Bratland}} for listing the references above. But. As I already stated above, references must be '''intellectually independent''' in order to meet the criteria for establishing notability. I also stated that interviews with Schomer or their staff or their customers/suppliers/etc generally do *not* meet the criteria. I'm not sure if my summary of policy/guidelines was misinterpreted but, of the first six you list under the heading of "more than meet GNG and CORPDEPTH", three significantly rely on quotations and interviews and therefore fail  and/or . But I believe that https://www.seattletimes.com/pacific-nw-magazine/vivaces-david-schomer-is-on-a-mission-to-pour-the-perfect-cup-of-coffee/ this seattletimes.com reference meets the criteria as it has (in my opinion) sufficient independent opinion. The http://old.seattletimes.com/text/2016149945.html remaining reference fails . None of the remaining references (excluding the books) meet the criteria either but since I do not have full access to some of the quoted books (and given that it is clear that Schomer is revered by knowledgeable baristas), I would be far more inclined to create a David Schomer article since *all* of the references invariably talk about David and he appears to be better known than this business
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)