Deletion of Chariot (Australia)

Comment: No legitimate deletion argument has been presented. Has the nominator followed ? Plenty of sources are available: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/chariot-calls-trading-halt/story-e6frgal6-1111112147642, http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/07/1068013375655.html, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it-old/chariots-voip-goes-ahead/story-e6frgamx-1111112139998, http://www.smh.com.au/news/breaking/datafast-chariot-to-merge/2005/07/13/1120934286596.html, http://www.telecompaper.com/news/soul-extends-offer-for-chariot-shares--620469. AfD is not 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: The topic meets  per the sources presented above by User:Pburka. Also, per , notability is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)