Deletion of Abdul Makim Khalisadar

Comment: per RomanLady. I agree completely with her first sentence: "The article is focused on Abdul Makim Khalisadar, but it relates to, and evidences, much broader issues." The article is a |coatrack, not primarily concerned about this one incident, but masquerading as a biography. Otherwise, it's a one-time news story because of his religious affiliation, with no sustained coverage, which doesn't indicate any historical significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Appears to be a case of , but the BBC article cited in the references does say he "was well known for giving religious talks"http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7301975.stm which indicates broader notability, and other sources also make this claim; however, I find no RS documentation of him before the crime, so I suppose this should be interpreted more as "locally well-known" which does not confer notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)