Deletion of Call-out culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: It is not a neologism when it is a mixture of very simple words. This meets , I found https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/26/fashion/keen-gucci-shoes-copy.html, the book ''Kill All Normies'' has a "culture war" perspective on this, and the British book ''Feminism: A Fourth Wave?'' discusses this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This nomination seems to be in bad faith. There https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Call-out_culture&oldid=895107896 were a great many more sources (86) before Bacondrum began to slice up the article. Yes, it was in bad shape as it was in the process of merging in cancel culture, but there was extensive sourcing from a large number of |reliable sources (including ''many'' prominent authors and publications) that were summarily removed by Bacondrum prior to listing the article here. I understand the intent behind the edits and in some ways the article had definitely grown too large and lost focus, but to suggest the term(s) have {{tq|little or no usage in reliable sources}} is bunk. I also agree that there are a number of closely related terms all about the same or extremely similar terms/phrases like Milkshake Duck, online shaming, public shaming, cyberbullying, mobbing, mob justice, online boycott, outrage culture, and/or outrage porn (though I'm sure there are others out there as well) and, in theory, a single article encompassing all of these terms could suffice. (Indeed that was the point of merging cancel culture and call-out culture.) Until such a time as that centralized article about the general phenomenon is created, keeping this article is a fair outcome and deletion serves no purpose. At the very least it should be redirected to one of the similar terms/phrases listed above.&nbsp;-&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)