Deletion of Katja Glieson (2nd nomination)

Comment: Considering the article solely on its current condition and merits, I see several reliable sources that cover Glieson, so the article passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this is a mess. According to Wikipedia:Deletion review#Katja Glieson, this page is proposed for deletion because of  (which is not suitable grounds for deletion) and lack of notability and being "of little value" to WP. The page was already proposed for deletion six months ago and the result was keep.   was alleged and I have to concur. The nominator for today's AfD is a SPA opened earlier this month who has only edited this article and
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:BADFAITHONOM)

Comment: While I procedurally nominated this on behalf of another user, the subject satisfies  and I see no valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)