Deletion of Natalie Holland

Comment: Inclusion in the BP Portrait and Royal Society of Portrait Painters exhibitions does not imply  notability; The press coverage of the latter was triggered by its subject rather than the artist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ARTIST)

Comment: When it was prodded, the article was very poorly sourced. I spent some effort tracking down as much press as I could find and adding it to the article. When I was done I felt it was enough of an improvement to make notability a debatable issue (rather than just not having any) and deprod the article. But I'm not certain it's enough to make a clear case for . And I think what you see is what you get: there isn't some hidden trove of sources missing from the article that would demonstrate notability more convincingly
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)