Deletion of Zoltan Feher (diplomat-scholar)

Comment: for now in the absence of the history.  The article is blatantly |promotional, and the subject appears to have some success in churnalism and in making himself famous for being famous in a small way.  It appears that the subject and others are trying to use Wikipedia to promote the subject's career and views for some ulterior agenda.  The draft that I reviewed was deleted at the request of its author, and now a new article has been created.  Was the draft deleted in order to delete my comments?  I review a lot of drafts, and have requested that this draft be undeleted to my email, both for my comparison and to see what my comments were that evidently needed to be hidden
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: I have seen the deleted version.  The deleted draft and this article are almost identical, and the draft is unmistakably an |autobiography
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO)

Comment: Way  for  for this PhD student.  The best case for GNG notability is via the Daily Iowan (the student newspaper of the University of Iowa) and Diplomata sources, but I'm not seeing the former as significant coverage, and I'm uncertain of the independence of the latter.  The article has severe  issues, and overall I think the case for  is stronger than that for GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NPROF||WP:PROMO||WP:TNT)