Deletion of List of historical confusions

Comment: per nom. Unclear as to what was confusing, who was confused, why it was confusing...I'm so confused. I cannot fathom what kind of encyclopedic entry would be possible from this title, or how it would not be |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: If this is a list for historical confusions, then that article should be much longer than its current state. Also, what is the confusion about? I see no confusion! I'm as confused as Agent 86! Also, the article will eventually violate , since confusion is a biproduct of perception of the mind. Also, the article provides no , does not assert , and does not  its sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:CITE)

Comment: The list is poorly defined and far too broad to be satisfactorily encyclopedic. It's also subjective and |unverifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:V, , unencyclopedic. Supposedly a list, but it isn't now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Patent nonsense (WP:NONSENSE)