Deletion of Boid for Android (2nd nomination)

Comment: since it fails the |general notability guideline, as it doesn't have any ''significant coverage'' nor does it have sources that is ''independent of the subject'' (current citied Google/Android really isn't independent of the subject), therefore this article fails on |reliable and |verifiable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: per GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)

Comment: There are enough sources to prove notability.  Reviews in publications about Android, phones or mobile software still count, provided they are independent of Google and of the app's creators and publisher (so Google Play isn't a reliable source but independent Android news may be assuming it meets requirements of independence and professionalism).  Blogs in publications like Computer World are reliable sources per  "Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control." There's no requirement that sources are in Google Books or NewsBank or Google News
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)