Deletion of Jono Bacon

Comment: while the article had no independent third party refs that showed  I have now added one that does establish this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per  and .  Even accepting Ars Technica as a reliable source for the sake of discussion, the story mentions Jono Bacon only in the context of planned future accomplishments (see ).  The Southern California Linux Expo page bio is promotional in nature and presumably not fully independent.  The O'Reilly sources identify Bacon as an author of specific books, but that isn't enough for notability, and since O'Reilly published and is trying to sell these books, the independence of these sources can be questioned.  All the referenced pages in Bacon's own blog are, well, right out per .  Same with the page from Mark Shuttleworth's blog.  If there is any other source here that meets the requirements of being "reliable" and "independent of the subject", it's hard to find a needle in a haystack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:INDY||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SPS)