Deletion of Nurcahyo Haryo Tejo

Comment: As has been pointed out, although  says that politicians '{{green|who have held... national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office}} are deemed notable; but, crucially, that this is also ''secondary'' to - it assumes that '{{green|people who satisfy this criterion will almost always satisfy the primary criterion}}. Which the subject of this article does not; a  search actually brings up only '''one source'''(https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Nurcahyo+Haryo+Tejo&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=qMMEWY3WE8zWgAbGooywAQ#q=Nurcahyo+Haryo+Tejo&tbm=nws ), which hardly mentions him at all. Tha being the case, I am very tempted to also concur that we are being hoaxed that the name exists, but is not in the Indonesian legislature- otherwise why so little coverage? However, I also note that the article actually states that 'was a senatorial candidate'- and if only a candidate, then, per , '{{green|candidates who ran but never were elected for a national legislature or other national office are not viewed as having inherent notability}}. Eitherway, fails  and  by miles.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: An unelected political candidate does not get a Wikipedia article just for the fact of being a candidate — if you cannot demonstrate and |properly source that he was ''already'' notable enough for an article for some other reason ''besides'' his candidacy itself, then he must ''win'' the election, not merely run in it, to be considered notable ''because'' election per se. But this contains no sourcing, nor even any substance that ''suggests'' that a preexisting notability claim would even be ''possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)