Deletion of The English Project

Comment: If there were strong coverage by secondary sources, the subject might satisfy . The External References seem to promise that, but three of the four links are broken, and the mention in the fourth is incidental
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: and '''Rewrite'''. On the one hand, the newspapers cited are major publications such as The Times, and there are full-legth articles about the project; on the other hand it looks as if these articles may be based completely or mostly on press releases. I have no doubts that there will be plenty of sources once it gets going, and that the project will become more than sufficiently notable for a WP article, but |unfortunately that's not enough. Am biased because this looks tremendously exciting :-) If kept, the article would have to be rewritten, possibly by cutting it down to a |stub and re-building it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:STUB)