Deletion of Ripple Music

Comment: The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short,  requires multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. So for a record company, I want to see articles *about* the record company, not about the artists or new releases, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Article describes actively engaged recorded music label, publisher, distributor, and cultural entity in music genre and subgenre operating for over 10 years representing broad roster of active musicians and significant catalog of recordings. Ripple Music is clearly a long standing active entity on https://www.allmusic.com/artist/ripple-music-mn0002560446 AllMusic.  Ripple Music is clearly a long standing active entity on https://www.discogs.com/label/209142-Ripple-Music Discogs.com.  indicates that many artists in repertoire would meet notable criteria, whether or not they themselves are represented with Wikipedia articles or entries. There is limited discussion indicating how to assess Notability for smaller and independent record labels and music publishers as culturally significant. Wikipedia Notability guidelines should not unintentionally bias toward "major" international corporate entities or certain "major" institutions. Discussion appears to contain Moving Goalposts when presented with notable references by invoking , , &  to refute notability. These can continue to be leveraged to argumentum ad infinitum as invoked here, they would also apply to most genre or regional music organizations that exist to promote culture and artists. The page needs fixing not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:INHERITORG||WP:ITSOLD||WP:LOCALFAME)

Comment: as subculturally notable music label. In addition to  and , keep in mind that small subcultures (such as specific metal subgenres) may have little coverage that looks relevant to an outsider looking in, but this doesn't necessarily mean they lack that coverage entirely -- it simply may require more familiarity to spot. The improvements to sourcing this article has seen since listing appear quite clearly reliable coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:DINC)