Deletion of Criticism of YouTube

Comment: and '''Reorganize''' Content. As it is right now, the article reads like a POV fork, which violates . Now, this is mainly due to the last two sections.  There's a trick here.  If this article was specifically targetted to discussion YouTube and Copyright (including both what steps it takes including the audio forensics) and criticism of that (how to name it, I don't know), and the other sections moved back to the main article, we're removing the NPOV issue without losing coverage.  But keeping those last two sections outside of the main youtube article hurts this article's viabilities
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Growed like Topsy" is a figure of speech. Many Wikipedia articles do this over a period of time. It is easy to point out problems in Criticism of YouTube such as ,  and . However, there are articles like Criticism of Wikipedia that manage to live with these issues without being deleted. This is why I would support  as the first option here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE||WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: Enough well-sourced contents to justify a separate article from YouTube#Criticism per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)