Deletion of Scott Cruz

Comment: per . Cruz meets criteria 8 - he has written the music for a notable television series (The Nostradamus Effect). The fact that he has won three Telly awards, while not independently indicative of notability, does it for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: as self-promotion failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: It comes down to specific vs. |general notability here. Yes, he meets criterion #10 for musicians at . However, note the header at the top of the list: "A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) ''may be'' notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria."emphasis added Performing a theme song does not make one automatically notable; the general standards of notability still apply, and that means significant coverage in |reliable sources. There is no evidence of significant coverage. If he's been written about in a newspaper or magazine article, that would change things, but as of right now, there's a lot of un|verifiable content in this article and not a lot of sources for the article to rely on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSIC||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: He fails criterion 8 because the three awards are all Bronze Telly Awards, which are handed out in large numbers. There are so many that they don't even post the full list like they do with the http://www.tellyawards.com/winners/list/entries/?category=2&award=2 Silver Awards, you can only search the http://www.tellyawards.com/winners/list/entries/?category=2&award=3 Bronze database. I agree that they are judged and the awards may increase his notability within the industry, but they do not meet criterion 8 in any way. He does appear to meet criterion 10, depending on whether we consider his work other than "The Nostradamus Effect" to count, which would mean adding him to the The Nostradamus Effect article is insufficient. I will defer to those more versed in music on that matter, hence the "weak" keep. In any case, the article has obvious  issues still that are hard to fix without more published sources. I've added him to "The Nostradamus Effect", which is the first incoming link
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)