Deletion of Brains: Philosophy of Mind

Comment: per nom.  The statement by the article's creator and sole author (just above, which said: "After reading of the policy, I do not find that it is need of being deleted") is a conclusory statement without any evidence in support. I do not see a reason to withdraw the nomination or change my opinion on this issue at present.  I do recognize that it can be an ever-bending issue in a forum such as Wikipedia.  For instance, not long ago the accepted position was that only colleges should merit inclusion as articles in WP, and fairly quickly many more of the AfD debates have moved to high schools, and even to elementary schools.  Similarly with blogs maybe; but I've been under the impression that , eliable sources and other relevant guidelines have still been intended to mean we shouldn't use WP to introduce and attempt to disseminate a blog, but should instead constrain ourselves to describing such an endeavor only after it achieves widespread attention of its own accord
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:notability)

Comment: I failed to find any non-trivial mentions in independent non-blog sources (http://www.google.com/search?q=link:philosophyofbrains.com links http://www.google.com/search?q=philosophyofbrains ghits1), and so it seems to fail .  Whois indicates the domain was created on 14-Jul-06.  There doesn't seem to be any independent sources for an article yet. Groklaw is an example of a blog meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: per all of the above, and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)