Deletion of Human spirit

Comment: per the total rewrite since nomination that addressed the nom's concerns and turned an essay into an article that bears little resemblance to what was first sent to AFD. I wonder how a concept so heavily covered in http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Human%20spirit%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf8&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US&tab=np books and even http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Human%20spirit%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf8&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&sa=N&tab=pn news could be seen as non-notable. The |potential for improvement seemed quite clear. Nice to see that someone was willing to actually |fix a surmountable concern through regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:ATD)

Comment: Rewritten, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)