Deletion of St. Mary's Cathedral, Pazhanji

Comment: Delete''' the Keep votes in my opinion are based on the first impression of the title and a lack of research on this church and its coverage. the Cathedral fails  spectacularly. Was only in news for wrong reasons https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/in-other-news/071017/pazhanji-fireworks-land-church-in-spot.html of animal abuse. The article itself was  and I removed the Facebook link from infobox and other spams. Per their own http://www.pazhanjicathedral.com/history.html official website it is "''few''" hundred years old without any date, (How convenient). I would say they are trying to bluff, and the ambiguity regarding the age is deliberate as its suits the church. None of their claims about age should be taken seriously. It is a common tactic in this area, to attract more followers by fabricating the age of the church
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Satisfies GEOLAND. Cathedrals are legally recognised under ecclesiastical law (canon law). For the avoidance of doubt, we should for this purpose take into account the laws made by a non-established church or government-in-exile, etc, provided it is sufficiently powerful to merit our attention. There seems to be coverage http://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22പഴഞ്ഞി+പള്ളി%22, but I am having difficulty reading it as my browser doesn't support Malayalam. I think it is worth bearing in mind that the vast majority of books are not searchable online, and those that are mainly come from large university libraries in the USA, with all the systematic bias that implies. WP:NRVE says that if offline sources are ''likely'' to exist, we do not delete. In the case of a historic church or cathedral in India, I think we can infer that it is likely. Finally, I must point out that  is still policy, and if we are satisfied this building is a Syrian Orthodox cathedral, then not having an article on it would prevent us from improving and maintaining the project, which is forbidden by said policy. And AADD is an essay, so what it says carries very little weight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)