Deletion of T.O.'s Law

Comment: The assertion has been made that |Wikipedia is not for things made up on the internet one day.  While I agree with this statement, it does not apply to this law, which has been stated in many forms in the past.  It is also sad that just because 'established' Wikipedians don't recognize it, it should be deleted.  Furthermore, having been coined within the year is hardly a reason to delete it.  Is there a law that states "all laws coined within a year are not laws?"  Maybe there should be.  I'll call it theprez98's law.  Finally, the forums on which the law was published are clearly a reliable source and should be considered so.  '''Do not delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: per nom.  Yet another |neologism "law".  The prod removal comparing this to Godwin's makes me want to invoke ''Isotope23's Law'':  "The day your law, based on Godwin's Law, is as referenced and pervasive as Godwin's Law... then it might deserve an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)