Deletion of The Intercultural Alliance of Artists & Scholars, Inc. (IAAS) (2nd nomination)

Comment: I can't find anything to show that this organization is notable enough for an article at this point in time. The best thing I found was https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/books/2016/07/19/the-hole-story-sweet-tale/MDbo6lrUyKeFR1b0MHzPBM/story.html this link, which isn't really about the organization but rather a book that its leader edited, and http://www.wweek.com/culture/2016/04/05/april-is-whiteness-history-month-at-portland-community-college/ this story that briefly mentions IAAS in passing, making both  sources as far as the organization goes. If and I stress ''if'' her article survives deletion then this could maybe redirect there, but I would recommend against any redirects or merges until the AfDs settle and we see what - if anything - remains. The whole lot is so promotional and needs such extensive editing that even if even one of these articles survive deletion I'd recommend -ing the lot because of the . All of that aside, all I can really find are things that show that the organization exists, which does not give notability in and of itself. An organization can exist and do nice things, however none of that gives notability. (, ) To be honest, the only people that have really written about this organization are people and organizations that are related to it in some form or fashion. This article is far, far less promotional than the other articles, but as a whole the tone of the articles make a fairly good case as to why editing with a COI needs to be done very, very carefully. I'd also say that if any of these articles ''do'' survive deletion, that it'd be a good idea to restrict both editors from making any direct edits to the articles to prevent promotional edits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:TRIVIAL||WP:TNT||WP:PUFFERY||WP:ITEXISTS||WP:NOBLECAUSE)