Deletion of Strata (band) (second nomination)

Comment: Renominated for deletion this second time in accordance with Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Decisions_to_be_reviewed|Wikipedia: Deletion Review because no consensus was reached in last debate. Band has not demonstrated notability. Evidence of vanity. Stand behind earlier arguments and wikipedia policy in  requiring two releases, and a lack of |reliable sources outside of their own website giving details of a tour. See also , . Having read the earlier arguments I am anticipating a string of google hits as an argument. Don't bother, as I can get a string of google hits for any number of random people, words, and concepts, but does not demonstrate the slighest notability. Furthemore, the onus is or should be on those who wish to keep the article, to demonstrate notability and adherance to  especially, using verifiable sources which can not include the band or fan gossip due to their biased self-promotional unreliability. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for fancruft. Band has one album out, not REQUIRED two
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: keep renominating" makes it sound like I have renominated it more than once. In fact, I only renominated it one time, but that renomination was immediately closed by a non-admin citing . Someone else reopened it at that point. According to a Wikipedia policy article that I am too sick of repeating, it is a common practice for a quick renom if it is due to non-consensus. If there was a consensus to keep then I would not have renominated the article. It is not bad form. In the end though, Wikipedia is not a democracy and all articles should conform to policies and standards set up to keep Wikipedia at an academic level...notability and verifiability criteria should not be neglected or placed at lesser importance to subjective opinions about an articles worth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)