Deletion of Murder Among Friends

Comment: but also 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN)

Comment: The film/play has quite a few hits on Google News https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=au&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Murder+Among+Friends&oq=Murder+Among+Friends&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.4186.10426.0.10522.30.9.3.14.0.1.729.2264.2j2j2j2j6-1.9.0...0.0...1ac.1.zlKBuXEzkwkhttps://www.google.com.au/search?q=Murder%20Among%20Friends%20site:news.google.com/newspapers&source=newspapers&gws_rd=ssl. There's easily enough sources out there for the subject to meet . Sure, the article needs work, but instead of being deleted, it should be |improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IMPROVE)

Comment: per meeting  through available sources.  I remind the nominator that a |topic's notability is dependent upon sources being available and never upon their ever being used. THAT's a matter for |regular editing, and it does not improve the project to delete an |arguably notable topic simply because it may start out |looking poor.  We fix. The stage play https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Murder+Among+Friends%22+site:news.google.com/newspapers&source=newspapers has coverage to meet  and so does the film. ? ,  , . It will serve the project if the article were to be expanded to cover both the notable stage play and the resulting film of the same name
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NEXIST||WP:IMPROVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:UGLY||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPROVE||WP:WIP||WP:IMPERFECT)