Deletion of TheGamer

Comment: Lets try to get some more sources onto this article" is not a valid rationale or grounded in policy or guidelines on Wikipedia. Like Govvy has said (and is pretty much a Delete argument, rather than a Keep one), the subject fails  because it lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources and that is what matters, not whether we think it's well known or not (for example Hardcore Gamer and GameZone both got deleted but are often used as references for video game article). References in the article represent press releases in Valdosta and Financial Post, with listings on 1 other websites and a primary references to Valnet and the website itself (with passing mention to be found in searches). Sadly the website isn't notable for Wikipedia standards, at least not now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: since subject fails  and . |"I rather like it" is not an argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NWEB||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: simple case of failing the . This debate is probably only still active because of low participation, as neither Keep !vote are anywhere near a valid rationale
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)