Deletion of Metaforic

Comment: insufficient |significant coverage found of subject from non-primary |reliable sources to indicate the subject is notable per  or . Subject has received passing mention in reliable sources, however most are PR releases and are not considered when determining notability. The ''BBC'' has written http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7461901.stm an article regarding the subject, but one article does not make multiple reliable sources. Although the article clearly falls under , AfD is not |a tool to repair articles, nor should sermountable issues be a reason for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:CORP||WP:GNG||WP:NOTADVERT||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: WP:CSD#G11|unambiguous advertising: ''Our technology is proven in millions of deployed instances, from consumer deployments through to business devices. Metaforic solutions directly prevent any change to code or data by automatically adding real time security to code that is to be protected.''  'References' are to routine announcements of funding and press releases, and do not establish |significant effects on history, technology, or culture
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: as pure unadulterated  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:SPAM)