Deletion of List of fictional television shows (3rd nomination)

Comment: This list is essentially an orphan being referenced by articles almost entirely as a see also in other fiction lists. An article, if there were adequate reliable secondary sources, about fictional TV and radio programs might be enjoyable to read.  This list is not useful, and smacks of . To paraphrase the U.S. Supreme Court in Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service, sweat of the brow does not create notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: my opinion from last time hasn't changed. This is a |sourceless, |indiscriminate collection of |trivia. TenPoundHammer is correct when he says that all the keep votes last time around amounted to nothing more than "|I like it", and I think the consensus should actually have been recognized as "delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:TRIVIA||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: The nomination is now incorrect - the article has a source.  As consensus was established at the last nomination, this seems to be a disruptive nomination contrary to our |deletion policy:"''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hopes of getting a different outcome''".  If the nominator disgrees with the previous outcome, the correct process to use is 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:DRV)