Deletion of Sandeep Kishore

Comment: re|Rosguill}} Please keep in mind that ''Forbes'' articles are not always independent. Per Forbes|the Wikipedia article: "''Forbes'' currently allows advertisers to publish blog posts on its website alongside regular editorial content through a program called BrandVoice, which accounts for more than 10 percent of its digital revenue."  specifically calls out ''Forbes'' for this, stating: "The blog post is significant and secondary – but may not be independent (blog posts are often sponsored; thus without evidence otherwise, editors should exercise caution and exclude the source) and not reliable (self-published sources are generally not reliable)." I would not base removing the nomination on a ''Forbes'' article for this reason
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: Fails  due to lacking sustained . The Forbes article is a good start, but is mostly just quotes and does not along with the other trivial sources get this article over any notability bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The trouble I'm finding with sources surrounding Mr. Kishore is they all largely focus around quotes from him, are interviews with him, or most notably, with the articles from the Press Trust of India|PTI (seen in different outlets but written by the agency), use press releases from the company as their only source. Even the ''Forbes India'' article, (''Forbes'' is not assumed to be independent per my comment above) largely only mentions quotes from Kishore. Because of this, the subject ostensibly fails ; it passes "significant coverage", passes "in multiple", and passes "secondary sources", but it seems to completely fail "reliable" (per : "self-published sources are generally not reliable") and "independent". '''Comment''': If the article is kept, its citations undoubtedly need to be cleaned up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)