Deletion of Katekavia Flight 9357

Comment: Article meets  (significant coverage, independent of the subject, etc) with the |sources provided. Wikipedia:NTEMP#Notability_is_not_temporary invalidates your arguement about it becoming historically notable.  Maybe you should try to start a centralised discussion about the WP notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Passes / with sources, guaranteed additional coverage in the future because investigation has begun, the crash also led to an investigation of the airline itself, meaning it passes the "...precedent or catalyst for something else of lasting significance..." clause of , not to mention the "significant national or international coverage" of the crash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:EVENT)