Deletion of Thymiaterium

Comment: per  and .  The suggestion to merge an article on a populated place to a biography is a terrible idea.  But I could accept the IP's suggestion of a merge to Mehdya if we are sure that there is academic consensus that this is indeed the location of the site
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: The identification with Mehdia seems to be inference, though assumed by two commentators.  The article on Mehdia in fact says nothing of the subject.  It ought to contain one sentence that it is thought to be identical to Thymiaterium.  As with many things from the ancient world, we probably know no more than stated in the article.  If so, the stub tag should be removed: it is an invitation to .  Indeed it might be best to tag such articles as having {{tld|no scope for much expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  and . Not much more to it than that. If Wikipedia were around in the time of Hanno and we applied our guidelines then as they apply now, it would be considered notable. And notability not being temporary, it stands to reason that it remains notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:GEOLAND)