Deletion of Murder of Casey Kearney

Comment: I see nothing notable about the victim or suspect (except for this incident), and nothing unusual or notable about the incident itself. Also seems to be a violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per DGG. Wikipedia is not a compendium of every homicide in the world which gets a splash of coverage. It could be userfied in case there is someday reason to think it satisfies , such as if there are new laws, societal changes,   books/movies/plays about the killing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It has been a week since this happened and the media interest has dropped to a trickle of  coverage. No objection to putting this article on ice to be recreated should new significant coverage emerge, but for now there is no indication this is anything more than a #NEWS|significant news story that does not merit an encyclopedic article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOT)

Comment: Now let's turn an old argument on its head. When you consider there are something like 700 murders in the UK each year, most of which rate little more than a few paragraphs in the national media, the fact (for whatever reason) this one has received more press coverage speaks for itself. I believe  and  are satisfied here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: or '''userfy''' for a while - at least till the trial so we can determine its notability. The fact it has continued to receive news coverage means it probably goes beyond 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: While sad, and locally horrific, this event doesn't rise to the level of a historic event as needed for  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM||WP:BLP1E)