Deletion of Murder of Brandon Brown

Comment: Passing  per continued coverage since it happened in 2012. it is not a n "local affair" ha recieved plenty of national attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Despite its title, the article is currently presented as a biography of Brandon Brown so its understandable how WP:VICTIM might be invoked. Articles such as this technically fall under the "/CA|Criminal acts" section of  which attempts to reconcile WP:GNG with OT#NEWS. That section states: "Articles about criminal acts, particularly those that fall within the category of 'breaking news', are frequently the subject of deletion discussions. As with other events, media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those regarding reliable sources." The "above guidelines" referred to are  (currently fails),  (passes),  (currently fails),  (currently fails), and  (passes). There is obviously some subjectivity in determining how these are collectively weighed, so if "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events", my opinion is that this one falls short
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:EVENT||WP:EFFECT||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:INDEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: Even the coverage cited for the case is at best routine. No indication that this would get past , and the person's standalone notability is non-existent. Just like so many other "Murder of X" and "Shooting at Y" articles. There are crimes and events that have lasting historical value. This one does not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as per . this is just another murder, and the "long term" coverage is rather routine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM)

Comment: I've noticed quite a few "Murder of..." articles pass through here recently citing #NEWS instead of . I'm a bit concerned at whether these articles meet the latter, particularly  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NNEWS||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:EFFECT)

Comment: Yes, it was a news story. No, there is no indication it is of encyclopedic and lasting interest. Per . One event, involving a person no previously notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per ; ''"The victim...consistent with WP:BLP1E had a large role within a well-documented historic event."'' - it appears the only well-documented "historical event" the victim participated in was his own murder.  The documentation noted on the article is basically a wall of similar coverage containing issue related to only that one event.  Put 1,000 mentions down if you please, but it's still just one event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM)