Deletion of Themis Music

Comment: This strikes me as a subject that will probably eventually gain notability, but hasn't done so yet. The sources given do not pass  so it's a delete for the time being with no sanction against recreation if more references become available in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I'm not finding any more reliable sources that are better than last time around. Possible Speedy G4, but it has been over 6 months, so maybe not. Still doesn't meet notability per . If they keep going, they may get a mention in the music press as being the the most deleted band on wikipedia, which would then make them notable under Music#C1. Excuse my humour, I haven't had my morning coffee yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: The band clearly fails ; the article has been deleted before on these grounds and in the intervening time has not been signed, released even a single album on a notable label, or received any non-trivial coverage in third-party reliable sources whatsoever. I'm afraid webradio biogs just don't cut the mustard. The one potential claim to notability is as the most prominent members of a notable subgenre; however, if the subgenre consist of (at present) one band of note (the subject, up for deletion) then that crierion cannot be adequate. This is a pure vanity piece. Tangentially important, but could I advise people to take a look at the article's talk page before commenting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)