Deletion of Semantic reasoner

Comment: It seems easy to find good sources on the topic which approach it in a similar way, discussing various specific tools which exist for the purpose — see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=l0cF55YkcKAC&pg=PA199 Advanced Techniques in Web Intelligence'', for example.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion, per our |editing policy.  |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Entirely notable article, certainly not a link farm Anne, and your Afd reasoning is dubious at best. Are you trying to get rid of the article because it has too many links. It a huge and expanding field.  The article is clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: I've culled all the non-notable entries (superficially, I didn't search for RS for the redlinks) in the lists in the article and transferred the possibly OR comparison table to the talk page for future work, and removed what looked like a couple of promotional bits. The lead needs to be rewritten according to reliable sources. But a GScholar search shows 524 hits for "semantic reasoner" and 4,590 hits for "semantic reasoning"; this seems like a highly notable concept. A notable topic and article problems that are surmountable, per . suggest keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)