Deletion of 2015 New Year's attack plots

Comment: and expand.  It is simply another of the large number of articles on foiled terrorist plans.  These four foiled plans could, of course, each be given an independent article.  Sourcing for that exists.   It merely seemed efficient to group them this way.  This is not  because as these attacks were being reported, the others were mentioned: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/paris-terror-attacks/belgium-makes-10th-arrest-over-paris-attack-amid-new-year-n488371/ NBC; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/munich-shuts-two-train-stations-as-police-warn-of-serious-imminent-isis-terror-threat-to-new-years-a6792591.html/ The Independent; http://www.smh.com.au/world/brussels-cancels-nye-celebrations-turkey-attack-plots-foiled-with-arrests-20151230-glx3eq.html? Sydney Morning Herald.  I could fill this page with major news media covering these attack plots as a group. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/12/new-years-eve-security/422340// The Atlantic  The question (for editors who do a proper search for sourcing), is whether to keep this as one article or as four
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: this summary style of putting four practically unrelated attack plots together on the basis of their date isn't appropriate. If these four incidents shared a direct common thread (such as a single mastermind trying to make co-ordinated attacks), then I'd try to make a  judgement; but since they don't, I'm simply going to say that the style is unencyclopedic and an article of this title will not be appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: edit:  or '''merge''') clear  this is a collection of tangentially-related news stories grouped together via synthesis, with no coverage making any connection between them at all.  Additionally, it fails ; the coverage that does exist has no depth and no duration.  Bunching a list of several barely-notable news reports together to try and produce an article that will stick falls afoul of  as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)