Deletion of Hotel design

Comment: It is our |policy to improve articles about such a notable topic, not to delete them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: I applaud the efforts that have been made to clean up this article, but it remains a personal essay full of unreferenced non-trivial assertions. Indeed, the only in-article reference is for the bleeding obvious: ''"Hotel design is the design of hotels"'', whereas comments such as ''"Hotels are usually designed from the inside out to ensure the practical working and relationship of the parts in the most economical manner"'' are totally unsupported, and comments such as ''"hotels still commonly function to provide a welcome environment that supports the comfort of its guests, the provision or respite, rest and relaxation from the demands of a noisy and increasingly crowded society"'' are just fluff. As it stands, everything but the first sentence should be removed, and then the article would be speedily deleted (Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A3). The notability of the subject was never cited in the deletion rationale; what was cited was its failure to meet the policy . The fact that the article still fails this over six years since creation and despite the work now of Warden and Northamerica1000 reinforces my view that it is unsalvagable. It should be deleted and restarted from scratch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)