Deletion of Language Creation Conference

Comment: I think the AfD discussion should continue.   is not a criterion for deletion, but it is a big red flag regarding notability.  The policies and guidelines regarding |attribution are a bit in flux at the moment, but we have always required independent non-self-published sourcing.  Listservs and blog type sources are not enough.  The conference may well be sufficiently sourceable and notable when the book is published, but WP is |not a crystal ball.  Sai - if the article is deleted, then you might consider keeping a copy in your user space to perhaps recreate after the book comes out.  I would also recommend getting a non-affiliated editor to look at it first to avoid the COI issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:A||WP:CRYSTAL)