Deletion of Veracity of statements by Donald Trump (2nd nomination)

Comment: as the topic itself did receive more than a fair share of significant coverage while satisfying  as well from what I can see. Looking at some of the opposing views, I can see why  and  may be a concern, but ultimately I don't see a violation but will admit that perhaps a future edit or two could change that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Definitely, numerous reliable sources have constantly reported on verifiably false or misleading statements, including fact checkers from ''The Washington Post'' and ''The Toronto Star''; see, for example, references cited for :File:2017- Donald Trump - graph - false or misleading claims.png. Satisfies easily and is not political
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He's the biggest, if not the fattest, presidential liar in history, with falsehoods being spewed out at an unprecedented rate, so much so that ''The Washington Post'' (https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/donald-trump-washington-post-fact-checker-figure_n_5d526ff0e4b0c63bcbecbbea?ri18n=true over 12,000 as of August), CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/10/politics/donald-trump-lies-fact-check/index.htm "Donald Trump lies more often than you wash your hands every day"), ''The Guardian'' (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/21/donald-trump-lies-factcheckers "The 'exhausting' work of factcheckers who track Trump's barrage of lies") and others are keeping count/track. Satisfies  easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)