Deletion of Les Misérables (2012 film)

Comment: Plenty of references that demonstrate notability to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per meeting the |policy and |guideline. The SNG  (and its sub-section NFF) is, like all guidelines, headed by "best treated with |common sense, and occasional |exceptions may apply" (see ). While application of NFF is always being debated when we see an obvious meeting of  for a film that is close to principle filming, we may also consider that discussion of the ''topic'' of a film's production tis allowed through |policy to be discussed if properly sourced... and that  itself states "''A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets the general notability guideline''" '''and''' "''A topic for which this criterion is deemed to have been met by consensus, is usually worthy of notice''". It is through discussions such as these that reasonable and common sense |exceptions are considered, and we do not blindly adhere to NFF if doing so prevents improving the encyclopedia. Just as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:FUTURE||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:IAR||WP:FFEXCEPTIONS||WP:GNG||WP:FUTURE||WP:N||WP:FFEXCEPTIONS)

Comment: enough sources are warranted for the article to be kept. I also agree with the concerns by Michael Q. Schmidt; it meets both #CRYSTAL and . Darth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: NFF is a guideline, not a policy, and we should remember that it is not a hard and fast rule as a result. There is always the occassional exception, and I think this qualifies as one of them. There is more than enough coverage from independant third-party sources in this article for it to meet the requirements of , the overarching policy that supercedes the numerous project-specific guidelines. At the end of the day, NFF is there to stop the creation of articles on films that nobody has ever heard of and have never been discussed in reliable sources, or on films that have simply been announced as in creation with few (if any) other details announced for months - if not years - to come. This film |is none of that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IAR)

Comment: WP:N > 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: until production actually starts per .  As it's just a list of press releases, it fails #Events| which states that "it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage".  As this has been in development for 20-30 years, with various other directors attached over the years, there's nothing to stop it being in development for another 20 years.  If Wikipedia had been around in 1990, people then would have been saying "look - it has a director and a cast and everything - this film will be made
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:N)