Deletion of The Globe (student newspaper)

Comment: Cirt's improvements already establish |notability through |reliable sources, and I imagine it could be improved upon even more so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: I've done some research and improved the article with cited sources. I agree that in its prior state it was unsourced and of poor quality, but . I was also able to find a good deal more source coverage in LexisNexis, but that database is being slow and wonky for me at the moment, unfortunately, so it's quite slow going with that one. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTFORCLEANUP)

Comment: I can almost understand a https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Globe_%28student_newspaper%29&diff=643200525&oldid=643116267 one sentence stub being brought to AFD, and it was a pity that an improvable stub sat unimproved for so long, but  is not a valid deletion rational, and even though AFD is not intended to |force editorial attention, it often does just that. We now have a decent sourced article on a topic that serves the project and its readers. '''{{u|Cirt}}''' is to be thanked https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Globe_%28student_newspaper%29&diff=643299655&oldid=643200525 for his continued work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NEGLECT||WP:NOTCLEANUP)