Deletion of Paul Bogdanor

Comment: as not passing . I think this is the more relevant standard than  since his main claim to notability seems to be his work in the popular press and he doesn't seem to be an academic. But the sources in the article and that I could find in Google news archive seem only to mention him trivially; for instance reference 1 ("are there no moral barometers on campus") invokes his name only as the co-author of a quote used to start an otherwise-unrelated essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: I could only find sixteen cites, ''total,'' on Google News http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&as_scoring=r&as_maxm=10&q=%22Paul+Bogdanor%22&as_qdr=a&as_drrb=q&as_mind=13&as_minm=9&as_maxd=13&sa=N&tbs=nws:1,ar:1#q=%22Paul+Bogdanor%22&hl=en&as_qdr=a&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&ei=PBC2TLnDCcT58AaYx9iBDA&start=10&sa=N&fp=9f2370386c77b788 about Bogdanor, and none discussing him in any detail at all, let alone substantive detail, as is required.  I disagree with the  premise of the nom - the article doesn't advocate any positions, but merely states that the subject holds them - but I would expect a prominent blogger to have far more G-News cites, and so believe that the subject neither passes the GNG nor the WP:BIO bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)