Deletion of OVerus

Comment: per discospinster. And furthermore endorse nominator's filing of this AfD.  means we explain nicely to newbies what they are doing wrong and then correct their errors as we find them, instead of screaming acronyms and banning them. It does NOT mean that we give self-promoters free reign for N days/hours/seconds while they try avoid learning that yes, |conflict of interest isn't good and yes, |encyclopedias aren't for advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:COI||WP:ADVERT)

Comment: I tagged it, but I'm not the one who pulled the trigger. The closing admin should come by to explain why they concurred with the tag. Media attention is definitely key to establishing notability, but my concern was that the article didn't even ''assert'' notability. It only has to go a little bit past "Hey, it's notable!" to avert a speedy deletion. A claim will get you that past that hurdle, but once a claim is made, you need to back it up with |proper sourcing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as an advertisement for a non-notable business. |Boldly marked as a speedy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)