Deletion of Structure of the Austrian Armed Forces in 1989

Comment: Per {{u|Noclador}}. As noted, 1989 is a pivotal year with the end of the Cold War. OrBats have long been regarded as category of list, and a particularly useful one at that. : ''One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I cannot imagine why a list of the structure of the Austrian army in a particular year would meet  no matter how important that year was in terms of history. This article also lacks good secondary sources, of which none seem to exist, if I'm reading the above conversation correctly. So arguing to keep seems... rather odd to me. I would strongly encourage everyone involved to take a step back and evaluate the quality of this article from a neutral standpoint. I have no skin in this game; this isn't a subject that interests me particularly. Just evaluating from a policy standpoint, and I cannot possibly see how this could remain a part of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a smattering of information drawn from primary sources and basically amounts to one big  violation. No secondary sources have been put forward to demonstrate the notability of this topic. Find me some journal articles or books that talk about Austria's armed forces in 1989 in detail and I'll change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)