Deletion of Creatures of Half-Life

Comment: per . Also, hard disagree on the notion of there being a precedent for having poorly sourced lists. That's not true. |They may exist, but they shouldn't
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT||WP:OSE)

Comment: Totally on the fence, sorry. This list seems like it borders on . However, there are articles that would be considered subsections of this one such as Vortigaunt which are considered . Information on creatures in this series clearly exists due to the fact there are whole articles dedicated to certain parts that have become standalone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:GA)

Comment: to Half-Life (series)|Half-Life series. Large sections of the article remain unsourced, and there is not enough secondary sourcing out there to salvage it. The creatures notable enough for their own articles have them, and that is sufficient here. If it turns out to be the case for other creatures, then their articles can be made, but this article specifically tip-toes just a little too much into 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)