Deletion of List of controversial celebrity baby names

Comment: for almost to many reasons to list them all; everyone else has done so above.  Serious  issues; unless public figures in their own right, these children have a right to privacy.  List is indiscriminate; the world is filled with lists of things based on the authors own criteria; that these lists exists doesn't mean we need to repeat these lists here.  Wikipedia does not benefit for this list; if people need to read lists like this, I see no reason to stop them from finding them elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Per .  Another one of these lists with "unusual" or "controversial" in the title that needs to die.  What is "unusual" or "controversial" is subjective and open to disagreement.  If a list has an adjective in its title, it should be something like "first", "longest", etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Aren't most of these items violations of ,  and therefore need to be removed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPNAME||WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: This just looks like a |random list of celebrities who gave their children unusual names. In addition, not only are the names not controversial, but none of the sources even label any of the names as controversial. '''Erpert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: What makes a name "unusual" or "controversial" is a subjective opinion, making this list inherently fail the  and WP:SYNTH|synthesis policies. Where sources are cited, these are generally pretty crappy; someone above me called "throwaway pabulum", which is a fitting description. No source treats the topic as a topic, as opposed to just listing some alleged examples. Finally, I think some weight has to be given to  and  arguments
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BLPNAME||WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: Most of these items on this list are violations of  and .  Even if this article somehow survives this AfD, most of it will need to be cut out leaving it just a stub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPNAME||WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: Even if this article somehow survives this AfD, the vast majority of items will need to be removed per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPNAME||WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: For multiple reasons.  Yes, celebrities give their children odd names with some frequency, but I'm not sure it's Wikipedia's job to catalog them in alphabetical order.  The biggest problem is the subjective nature of what constitutes an "odd," "unusual" or "controversial" name for a child.  Opinions will differ.  At another level, I believe there is a  violation for the inclusion of any name that is not characterized as "odd," "unusual" or "controversial" in the mainstream media, and compiling such a list borders on original research per .  Then there's Dr. Mies' non-policy reason given immediately above: "Stupid.  Unencyclopedic.  A matter of taste--even if verified."  I agree with that, too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: strange" or "unusual" is not the same thing as "controversial". According to whom? A random gossip "journalist" who decided to name her children Steven, Simon and Samuel instead? Some of them aren't even ''"uncommon"'' let alone "unusual" or "controversial" (which, as I say, is a significant step further). Banjo Patterson|Banjo? Lennox Lewis|Lennox? Rhiannon and Romeo? The new title, "List of celebrity baby names" just turns this into a list of children of notable people, few of whom are notable in their own right which just creates a  issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The  page clearly states
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: As a general rule, Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lists#List_articles|list articles on Wikipedia are lists of links to Wikipedia articles, and given , those who are merely children of the famous generally do not get articles. Some of the supposedly unusual names here aren't unusual; more than one in a thousand baby girls in the US are being named http://www.babynamewizard.com/baby-name/girl/brooklyn Brooklyn putting it in the top 30 baby names, about one in four thousand boys are being named http://www.babynamewizard.com/baby-name/boy/romeo Romeo, relatively the same for Cruz; if someone deems them strange, that would be an opinion, and something that should not be in Wikipedia's voice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Should I say "self-explanatory" too?  No, I will actually explain my position by reference to |policy: "''The nominator ... fails to advance an argument for deletion''".  And not only does the nomination not bother to explain itself, it seems quite clear that no consideration has been given to .   The naming of babies is quite a big deal in the real world and so the topic clearly passes  as there are numerous examples of relevant coverage including
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:BEFORE||WP:LISTN)

Comment: An article on the phenomenon of certain celebrities choosing unusual names for their children would be supportable, but not this list. The |people listed in this article are private individuals and should be granted a presumption of privacy; it is not the job of an encyclopedia to point and laugh at them for a characteristic they did not choose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Firstly there is a serious  problem here. Controversial babies, anyone? Secondly, it is the articles in the press which are notable, not the subject matter. So a list of articles that mention the names of the children might be notable, but an extrapolation of that information is , as per this article, and is not acceptable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:SYNTH)