Deletion of Ch. Felicity's Diamond Jim (James)

Comment: Serious  issues, especially since these championships increase his stud fees. No other dogs in either Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show or AKC National Championship have their own articles. Although I'm an English Springer Spaniel fan, did rescue for a number of years, and even have an obedience title on my rescue dog, and I've heard from several sources that James excels in areas such as disposition that are often overlooked in the breed ring, the history of the article is one of advertisement, and it decreases my respect for his owners
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: No |independent sources have been given, i.e. independent of the dog's owner and of the organization which awards the prizes he won. Hence the subject fails the  guideline. If there was significant coverage about the dog in the mainstream press, one might consider it notable; but that does not seem very probable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDY||WP:N)

Comment: Won the most notable competition in his field, and 50 others apparently, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Felicity%27s+Diamond+Jim%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives well documented by reliable sources... 3 of which I have added to the article. Closer should take into account the unfortunate lateness of my comment/improvement of the article, and the fact that this article now clearly meets . Most comments were complaints that sources weren't cited yet in the article, or that it should be deleted as a punishment because of who created the article... which are weak and moot arguments at this point anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)