Deletion of 2013 Tour de France King of the Mountains

Comment: replacing my earlier !vote, which I have struck). I now realise that my objections are to the current version of the page, not to its existence.  Despite disputing the sources provided by Smitchlovesfunk, I have no issue with the notability of the climbing classification of the 2013 TdF. Further, once a subject is established as notable, |notability guidelines do not limit article content so my arguments above about sources "not establishing notability of the lists of results presented in the article" is meaningless.  I still think the current article is overly detailed but, if consensus agrees with me on that, it can be solved through ordinary editing issue and therefore not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NNC)

Comment: Hang on, a second.  Smitchlovesfunk is suggesting that the article should be kept because this information is not available anywhere else; others have also commented on the general unavailability of this kind of data.  But, if that's true, then the article is |unverifiable (I note that it currently does not cite any sources for the actual results) and therefore has no place on Wikipedia.  Alternatively, if there are sources available for this material, then the rationale for keeping it disappears. For the time being, the information is presumably on the http://www.letour.fr/ Tour website but they seem only to have last year's race archived and not previous years'.  Maybe they're on the Wayback Machine but, again, if they are, then this page is unnecessary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I just realised, while I have made many arguments to keep the page, I have not actually said keep in bold yet. Anyway, I have been doing a LOT of reading on Wikipedia and I have learnt an awful lot about it and its policies. And to some extent I have had to change my views on Wikipedia a little bit (but that is perhaps another story). From all the reading I have done I now see why some users are behind deletion. My initial thoughts (before I had found the page ) led me to want to post a lot of arguments along the lines of those found on |that page, but for some reason I didn't (I would love to use such arguments as: , , ,  and  - but I can't/won't). From reading this discussion over and over it is obvious to me the one key point is . So, while these articles don't cover the actual results (yet), I have nevertheless found articles that make 2013 Tour de France King of the Mountains notable: http://roadcyclinguk.com/racing/previews/tour-de-france-2013-king-of-the-mountains-contenders.html Tour de France 2013: King of the Mountains contenders, http://inrng.com/2013/06/tour-de-france-mountains-jersey-kom-contenders/ Tour de France: Who will win the Mountains Jersey?, http://sbbcolumns.co.uk/the-tour-de-france-2013-the-polka-dot-green-and-white-jerseys-and-team/ The Tour de France 2013 – The Polka Dot, Green and White Jerseys and Team, http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2013/jun/21/tour-de-france-2013-new-generation Tour de France 2013: France looks to new generation to end years of hurt and http://velovoices.com/2013/06/12/talking-tactics-how-to-win-the-polka-dot-jersey-at-the-tour/ TALKING TACTICS: HOW TO WIN THE POLKA DOT JERSEY AT THE TOUR. So, how'd I do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:ATA||WP:PLEASEDONT||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:INTERESTING||WP:NOHARM||WP:WAX||WP:NOTABILITY)