Deletion of Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct allegations (2nd nomination)

Comment: Regarding #NEWS: according to Wikipedia:Notability_(events): "Events are also very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards" I believe this is the case here. This is not just a routine news report about a minor event. The news have already made the topic notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Passes , , and as was noted in the closure of the previous AfD, to add this stuff to the main article would unbalance it. Also, regardless of whether these are allegations, the sheer amount of coverage of this topic is far beyond the routine. I am slightly uncomfortable with the inclusion of the list of accusers, but that isn't a reason to delete this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEVENT)

Comment: It definitely passes , the lasting impact of these allegations will be seen for decades in the movie industry and the debate over sexual assault. This is bigger than the individual now and the fact this is ongoing is not a reason to exclude it. So long as a neutral stand point can be kept about the allegations themselves, with no comment or implication as to whether he is guilty or not, the article does not fail BLP and as mentioned, including this within in the main article could have worse implications for neutrality
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)