Deletion of Julie MacDonald

Comment: Material is well-cited from reliable sources that are specific and in-depth about her. The news reports span several years, so she (or at least her actions and their results) are not only "15 minutes of fame", but continue to have an effect. Note: I declined a {{Template:db-attack|db-attack}} on this page (see Talk:Julie MacDonald for a brief comment by nom and my response). The article could use some work: a bit more bio, what (if anything of note) she accomplished before the controversial activities or since then. As it stands, it does feel at first glance to be very negative, but WP is a teriary source--the solution is to add other material to avoid  if that's the concern, not to delete what we have. I spot-checked the things that look (again, at first glance) to be COATRACK, and their cited sources actually do specifically mention her and her actions. So it passes  and is on-topic, and actually helps support her having substantial and lasting notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:V)