Deletion of David Wood (Christian apologist)

Comment: per DGG. Subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Most of the sources for the article are personal websites which fail . Though some of the Muslim people with whom Wood has debated have Wikipedia articles, the presence of some such articles does not ''automatically'' mean Wood warrants an article, per |Other stuff exists. Further, some of those articles should also be considered for deletion, e.g. Shabir Ally is insufficiently sourced to warrant an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OSE)

Comment: The reliable sources since added to the article seem to indicate the individual meets our notability guidelines.  I think it's important we guard against the article becoming a |coat rack, however, which seems like a particularly distinct possibility
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Someone65, while commendably passionate about his/her subject, appears to be arguing for inclusion from a "but people know him" position. I respectfully suggest that he/she read up on  to learn more about notability ''as required for inclusion in Wikipedia'' as opposed to "I think he's notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but expand. Needs to be improved. Lede needs to be a summary of the rest of the article so all of the citation requests in the lede need to be moved to the body and fulfilled there. The guidelines of  or  must be clearly displayed as well. Without the latter, I would have to change my vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)