Deletion of Robert Romano

Comment: The 'discernible reason' this was examined and then nominated is because I came across it while looking through CAT:NN; but that has nothing to do with the notability or otherwise of this character. It was also not nominated because it needs cleanup; that's irrelevant too. It is also not hugely relevant that the article :List of supporting characters in ER (which is not the article I suggested as best redirect) has limited detail. That article (or any) could be expanded, or this article could merge to an article - but not that one as it doesn't mention Robert Romano. All of that is just fluff - does this meet  guidelines? That is what we should be focused on
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: The keep !voters have not presented any source-based evidence. I personally was unable to find multiple reliable sources which establish the subject's notability. Most simply seem to be passing mentions. Therefore, I've concluded that this article fails , and as a side note a good deal of other fictional character articles likely fail the guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: We should place the question of this entry's existence into the much larger context of such proposals/essays (both active and inactive) as otability (fictional characters), otability (fiction), otability (fiction)/proposed-12-9-07, lot-only description of fictional works and the related Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas#Character article guidelines|WikiProject Soap Operas guidelines on character articles. Mindful of arguments set forth under ther stuff exists, we should also note that this 13,291 byte entry was singled out for no discernible reason from among the 25 other character entries at :Category:ER (TV series) characters (in April, the nominator had deleted and redirected to List of supporting characters in ER, another singled-out entry, Michael Gallant, which contained 8,118 bytes). It should also be noted that both entries have corresponding articles in Italian Wikipedia, while Robert Romano has an additional interwiki in Swedish Wikipedia. Moreover, List of supporting characters in ER has no character detail for any of its entries, thus depriving Wikipedia readers of all plotline history research contained within the original articles. All RODs and banners (that one may see appended to entries of numerous fictional characters) proclaim similar "original research", "general notability", "real-world context", "too long or excessively detailed" fault-findings which should be attended with judicious editing, rather than wholesale deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:N||WP:P||WP:O||WP:PROD)