Deletion of Waldron Mercy Academy

Comment: not only a Blue Ribbon school, the highest award an US school can receive, but a double award winner. Couple that with a bunch of notable alumni and plenty of sources that meet WP:ORG and it makes a convincing case for notability. COI we deal with by editing and, if necessary, by the use of admin tools - advise/warn/block. This is also a case where  procedures should have been applied. This was AfD'd less than 2 hours after creation and there is no indication that the nominator has searched and evaluated available sources nor considered the merit of the awards. The way forward is clean/source/expand not delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: due to multiple Blue Ribbon awards.  Notable alumni is not sufficient criteria, as notability |is not inherited.  Original author has been sufficiently |minnowed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:BITE)

Comment: ndash; I'm satisfied by the History section, not the Awards section, that the institution deserves an article.  I should note that my opinion comes from one helluva' anti-Catholic; just one who thinks that History ought to be preserved and defended in an encyclopedia.  The  problem can be solved by further editing and referencing.  If Catherine McAuley|da' penguin did something of an institutional nature in the US in 1861 that still stands in 2009, then it is ''notable'' achievement of said nun|penguin.  In this case, notable enough for an article (I considered merge to the Catherine McAuley article, but this would end up lopsided in that article).  Per  I consider this article a spin-off the Catherine McAuley article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO||WP:SS)