Deletion of Prabhat Samgiita

Comment: still short of notability. It's impossible to develop neutral non-|fringey content without sufficient coverage by ''independent'' sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: to Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar. It could be that a collection of over 5000 songs by Sarkar doesn't find |significant coverage in reliable independent sources because of |systemic bias ("availability of sources is not uniform"). Even if that is the case here, one has to wonder why none of the Indian news agencies or publication houses, even those from Kolkata, mention this collection in detail. Sarkar is not the only Indian spiritual writer whose discography doesn't meet WP's notability guideline. Kripalu Maharaj's ''Prem Ras Madira'', a collection of 1008 songs on Radha and Krishna, doesn't have an individual article. Rabindra Sangeet|Tagore's songs have an article but only because he is a Nobel laureate. Anuradha Paudwal's 5000+ religious songs in many Indian languages have a List of songs recorded by Anuradha Paudwal|dedicated article, but it too looks on shaky grounds with regards to notability. Maybe Indian media is elitist and secular or the sheer volume of religious songs makes individual collections non–notable. Whatever be the reason for the insufficient coverage it makes little difference to the fact that without significant coverage in reliable independent sources writing an article of reasonable length will require original research, which of course is against policy. Therefore, it makes sense to redirect this article to Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar#Music where this collection is already mentioned. If multiple sources do turn up later the article can always be recreated from them
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BIAS)

Comment: What I glean from the immediately preceding discussion, starting with Tito's "Comment", is an implicit recognition of notability and just some niggling over detailed aspects of mere ''guidelines'' that most likely arises only due to |systemic bias. Looking at this http://www.hindu.com/fr/2009/06/19/stories/2009061950100300.htm review in a reputable national newspaper, I can only wonder: Is it really very likely that a renowned singer, Ashwini Bhide-Deshpande, would take the trouble to learn and perform four songs from Prabhat Samgiita (one in Hindi, one in Sanskrit, and two in Bengali) and then never perform any of those songs again except in another concert organized by RAWA? Given the vast number of much weaker-sourced Wikipedia articles in respect to music, is this not an apt place where the fifth pillar of Wikipedia, , should kick in? If not here, then where? Is that fifth pillar just for decorative purposes, or does it have some practical implementation? And if that fifth pillar is employed on occasion, is it trotted out mostly to justify more instances of systemic bias
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:IAR)

Comment: While waiting for more information from my source in India (who mentioned that he would soon be going out of station for a few days), let me point out that I am not posting these references here because I consider them necessary to support the notability of this article in Wikipedia. In my estimation, that has already been well-established. I post these additional references here only to emphasize the outrageous nature of this AfD nomination and the total intractability of the nominator and his chums. But as Garamond has now started dismissing valid sources as invalid, let me reproduce here the Wikipedia policy regarding use of self-published material. According to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:SELFSOURCE)