Deletion of Somayeh Mohammadi (2nd nomination)

Comment: I truly agree with DreamFocus.  And for the reasons previously cited at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somayeh Mohammadi.  No compliance with efore.  There are lots of additional sources, which should be considered under .  ot paper applies.  Meets . You may not like the subject matter but  spikes that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:NEXIST||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:LIKE)

Comment: Per dvocacy. Nothing pointed out by Saff V. here, (including the "documentary" produced by the MEK's political opposition), is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Also per  and . Unreliable sources aside, the little coverage this incident has received in reliable media spans from November 2019 to February 2019, making this about a single event that lacks ongoing coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: the Article, it's obviously notable and also pass . That's weird, the article Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Somayeh_Mohammadi|nominated for deletion just 3 weeks ago and now nominate again... This sources covered the subject that proves it is a notable one, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/nov/09/mek-iran-revolution-regime-trump-rajavi 1, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/mek-maryam-rajavi-anti-iran-albania-cult-state-regime-a8556201.html 2, https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/people-s-mujahedin-and-its-quiet-war-against-iran-a-1253507.html 3, http://www.irinn.ir/fa/news/533258/%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D8%B3%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%87-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%B9%D9%86%DA%A9%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%82%DB%8C%D9%86 4. And about the , the article subject has covered a full story of a living person and it will expand more in future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I truly agree with DreamFocus, there is no point of nominating a page again and again if the desired result is not achieved. Although not sufficient but it has enough  to meet . Also, I still believe that the page needs a little more cleaning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)