Deletion of Stephen Hawking in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: per |substantial notability. http://books.google.com/books?id=yL3RBMEI5OgC&pg=PA103 This biography, for example, contains substantial discussion of his television appearances
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Irrelevant  nomination aside, an article on pop culture references does not mean we should immediately delete. I would prefer a merge, but there appears to be so many pop culture references here that merging looks unlikely, so keep and reference the thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Nom does not give a good reason for deletion other than |"I don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Nomination reasoning basically amounts to .  Popular culture is a perfectly valid subject, and describing the multiple cultural depictions of a particular individual seems perfectly reasonable to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: clearly , anything useful could go into the Stephen Hawking article, if anything it should be speedily deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:trivia)