Deletion of Blanket Music

Comment: When I removed Swpb's invalid second PROD from this before leaving for work this morning, I advised that anyone wishing to take it to AFD should (per ) search Google first. Sadly, this does not appear to have happened. If it had, they might have found these: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/blanket-music-p513290/biography, http://www.allmusic.com/album/cultural-norms-r711812/review, http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/794-cultural-norms/, http://pitchfork.tv/reviews/albums/793-move/, http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/blanketmusic-cultural/, http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/blanket-music-the-love-love-translation/, http://exclaim.ca/Reviews/PopAndRock/blanket_music-lovelove_translation, http://www.portlandmercury.com/portland/Content?oid=25942&category=22187%20, http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/blanket-music/cultural-norms.htm, http://www.tinymixtapes.com/music-review/blanket-music-cultural-norms, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0906319/soundtrack. Clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: A few tepid reviews" on some of the leading music websites in the western world are enough to satisfy .--'''sparkl
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Nothing came up in a 15 year Google news search, and only CMJ mentions turn up in Google books. While the sources listed by Michig (Allmusic, Pitchfork media, Tiny Mix Tapes, Pop Matters and The Portland Mercury) are all notable music publications, with the exception of the short Allmusic bio these are not feature story|feature articles about the band per ser. There is a mention of a song on a soundtrack, but the rest are music reviews. Also, the music reviews are in equal measure bad reviews. Whether or not notability can be established with a handful of music reviews--and mixed reviews at that--seems to be a gray area in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)