Deletion of List of Nazis of non-Germanic descent

Comment: Any determination to place any individual on this list would have to rely on |original research.  Certainly, secondary sources might indicate that a notorious Nazi was of part-Jewish descent, or of Polish descent, or of Lithuanian descent, et al.  But how is one to make a definite determination that the given individual is of "non-Germanic descent"?  Ultimately, it would be up to an individual editor's discretion, which isn't a good way of adding encyclopedic content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The nom's reasons for deletion are invalid. First of all, I'm not aware of any notability guidelines for lists, and the nom fails to specify which specific guideline it supposedly violates. It would meet the  in my judgment. Secondly and thirdly, original research is not by itself a reason to delete an article, and it could certainly be verifiable if the proper sources were found and cited. I think it could, however, be trimmed to include only more prominent Nazis. So, in summary, is this article messy, disorganized, and filled with original research? Yes. Does it need a lot of work? Yes. Are these reasons to delete this article? No
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)