Deletion of Legend Killer

Comment: any relevant information, although I don't think much of this in-world fictional stuff passes , and '''Redirect''' to Randy Orton
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: or very weakly consider '''Merge and redirect''' (note that merging requires that we retain information on original authors per the GFDL). Note that when participating in this discussion, it's not enough to argue that a page is |interesting or even |useful, and it's certainly not on to make ad hominem attacks about other participants suggesting that they shouldn't be voting because of their stance on the subject (since arguments are meant to be objectively based on policy, not subjectively based on whether |you like the article or not). Also, the images used in the article are almost certainly |fair use violations, since each serves only to provide an illustration of a single paragraph in the article, and is only barely doing more than decoration (it's not that far from the many, many images that were deleted for illustrating each entry in various "List of (TV show X) episodes" for similar reasons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:FU)

Comment: The page is nothing more than a list of notable wrestlers he has attacked. All the pictures violate . After it's deleted, maybe turn it into a redirect to Orton's page (since "Legend Killer" is his nickname
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:FU)

Comment: What little information is notable could still be folded into Randy Orton.  And that's not even mentioning the numerous  violations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:FU)

Comment: fails , , and . Not mention merging this would just unnecessarily elongate the Randy Orton article with non notable information, as any of these instances that is already notable is mentioned in the Randy Orton article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:POV)

Comment: Some of the relevant info (and it's debatable if it's even notable) appears to have been merged. This article is just pointless listcruft and has no encyclopedic merit. As stated above, I suggest you read 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)