Deletion of MP-02A Orgg

Comment: per . In the case of Fictional items,  would supercede the cited policies, as it makes no sense otherwise (why have a seperate specific policy for a fictional items if it's outranked by a more general policy?). Also, assertion that the article isn't written in a "real-world perspective" (while this this seems completely subjective and a questionalble assertion to me), even if true, isn't grouds for deletion, as it's a simple matter to re-write information from a different perspective. If there's a problem with having fictional material on Wikipedia, nominator should propose changes to policy instead of trying to backdoor his way through
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:FICT)

Comment: per . There is no point in deleting this when it can be merged and cleaned up under 's guidelines, and the nominators are not given other editors time to evaluate and cleanup these articles. Also, if sources are a problem, then they should be requested first. The nominators have made no attempt to do so
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:FICT)

Comment: to a list of MS IGLOO Mobile weapons or something of that sort.  Articles of fictional weapons are perfectly valid if they are the major characters of a series per , Articles of lists of fictional weapons are perfectly valid if they are minor characters of a series per .  Move this to AfM
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:FICT)