Deletion of Rajinder Kumar Kamboj

Comment: The term academician can also be used as an honourary title.  The subject is promoted as a "biotech executive". Once he had completed his education he immediately went into the corporate world.  As noted in the comment above,  should be the relevant guideline over .  There is a significant biotech industry in my area and I could point to many biotech execs with doctorates and patents who still would not meet criteria for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: agree with David Eppstein, that if his publication record doesn't show a significant impact on the research of his peers that he ought then to be judged on .  A quick ISI search for Kamboj RK turns up 53 papers, three cited over hundred times.  I don't have time now to check whether these are by the same RK Kamboj
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I'm not convinced he's an academic at all, so I don't see why  should be the relevant guideline. If it is, I think he fails it. Shouldn't we instead be looking at whether there are sufficiently many reliably-published secondary sources about him to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Lupin is http://www.lupinpharmaceuticals.com/about.htm a US$ 694 million pharmaceutical company; barely above midsized by American/global standards. By comparison, Merck’s sales are US$ 23 billion (Pfizer=$48B, Johnson&Johson=$63B). As a company representative, the subject’s http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=kamboj+lupin news coverage is fairly limited, which I think is important to check because even small companies can generate a lot of media coverage. So I think that notability here has to be established based on  criteria. I think that this http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sauthors=%22RK+Kamboj%22 citation impact may not be enough, since in the most widely cited papers he is neither the last or first author. I don’t think patents are a good basis for -notability assessment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)