Deletion of Agnostic theism (2nd nomination)

Comment: Nothing in the article suggests that "agnostic theism" is a discussed concept, let alone notable.  Wikipedia is |not an essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: per Godsy. This term gets https://www.google.ca/search?q=%22agnostic+theism%22&oq=%22agnostic+theism%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2319j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=%22agnostic+theism%22&tbm=bks just under 600 hits in Google Books, many of which are prima facie , so this meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources currently in the article, though they are few, are strong enough for the concept to meet the |general notability guideline. Part of the argument in the nomination would apply to agnostic atheism as well (i.e. "the meaning of the term agnosticism entails the rejection of both theism and atheism"). Furthermore, I disagree; agnosticism isn't an alternative to theism and atheism, nor is it mutually exclusive with atheism, one can be an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheist. In regard to "One of the citations is a broken link": per , "erifiability|Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online", but rather merely that it exists.—&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LR||WP:V)