Deletion of Jiverly Antares Wong

Comment: This is clearly not in violation of . The subject is known only for the  Binghamton shootings but that is clearly a substantial event being that he ranks 9th of all time on the List of mass murderers and spree killers by number of victims. I don't see how his information was not put on its own page in the first place. Charles Whitman on the other hand was only involved in one event and the link for University of Texas at Austin massacre on the School shooting page goes directly to Charles Whitman's site
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: This is clearly . The subject is known for nothing other than the Binghamton shootings, where his role is covered comprehensively
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I'm sorry, but this is the same argument I used at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Markoff(2nd nomination). The media will always make a big deal out of these events, and he is hardly the Zodiac killer. There is not enough evidence of lasting notabilty to ease by  concerns. I know 1E isn't a hard and fast rule, otherwise Neil Armstrong could be deleted, but this is not enough '''persistent''' coverage to qualify an article. "Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them." As for the about not about Martin Bryant's article, firstly  and secondly, massacres in Australia are a ''big deal'', and this event had the lasting effect of leading to the biggest gun law changes in Australian history
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:OTHERSTUFF)