Deletion of UC3 (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Hrafn.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: On this one I'm undecided about the group's notability. But Duffbeerforme found some sources, probably without much effort, which should have been done by the nominator. The nominator could also place those sources in the article instead of condemning the article because someone else hasn't done it. Meanwhile, this AfD and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.Y.T. (band)|a related AfD have degenerated into useless arguments about Wikipedia overall, which has nothing to do with whether a particular article is |notable. People are forgetting  (especially #2, #9) and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATA)

Comment: no indication that this group meets , and coverage of it seems to be simply a short-lived publicity blitz in Oct/Nov 2003. No indication of sustained coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)