Deletion of International reactions to the 2011 Norway attacks (2nd nomination)

Comment: Highly notable responses to a major world event.  states that "editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within its coverage, and to develop stand-alone articles on significant current events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Passes , major attacks comes with reactions which is totally appropriate for its own article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per passing . Why nominate clearly notable articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is nothing wrong per se with this article. It's well-sourced and the global reactions to such terrible events alone are often widely noted by the press. It boils down to : although it might  in hindsight seem almost silly to meticulously document all contemporary reactions, they are still clearly notable, and since hard disks space is so cheap, why not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)