Deletion of Jessa Rhodes (2nd nomination)

Comment: since subject does not meet  or even . The links proffered as "sources" above are not much help. There is a https://www.notizie.it/lifestyle/2019/10/24/jessa-rhodes-chi-e/ piece on Rhodes in an Italian website, caused by and focusing on a marketing gimmick ("the winner can spend a fiery night with her", etc), which brings her as close to  as one can get; there's a sociologist interviewing Rhodes https://uproxx.com/filmdrunk/the-adult-film-minute-the-ins-and-outs-of-being-a-porn-star-with-jessa-rhodes/ here, in ''Uproxx'', the article being about the life of a typical porn actress and not Rhodes herself, as is clearly stated ("Today’s up-and-coming porn starlet is a hustler of different proportions...Take for example Jessa Rhodes") - incidentally, the text's not making us very comfortable when it ends with a promotion of its interviewee, i.e. "Visit Jessa Rhodes on Twitter and Instagram at... also buy her charitable T-shirt for Profane Clothing", etc; there's a ''Forbes (magazine)|Forbes'' https://www.forbes.com/sites/susannahbreslin/2014/01/22/women-in-porn/#65a286b42bdc report on the 2014 AVN Adult Entertainment Expo and AVN Awards show, with our subject name-dropped once; and a small https://lenta.ru/news/2019/10/18/porn_star/ write up in the Russian ''Lenta.ru'' about her reddit Q&A session, a typical piece of blather. One has to dig far and wide for sources but, in the end, one comes up with nothing much: The subject is simply |not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:NPERSON)

Comment: sources presented are insufficient for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)