Deletion of Potions in Harry Potter (3rd nomination)

Comment: to Magic in Harry Potter. This page seems too specific and can be easily be included in here. It also seems like specific fan-content, like something you would find on Wikia|Fandom. Textbook 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: to Magic in Harry Potter, which itself needs to be cleaned up to remove egregious fancruft. The article fails  and , as the sources here are not used to support anything besides in-universe information, and what little information they can provide would be much better suited over on the Magic page than on this collection of in-universe fancruft
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:LISTN)

Comment: to Magic in Harry Potter for being a mere plot summary. Having secondary sources that repeat facts that can be found in the plot, doesn't establish notability. However, it's possible that this is a  case, in which case I prefer redirection over deletion. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)