Deletion of Olympus PEN E-PM1

Comment: Although people may have been confused by the variety of different names applied to this camera, there's no shortage of reliable sources in print and onlinehttp://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment/reviews/compactsystemcameras/129221/1/olympus-e-pm1.htmlhttp://www.expertreviews.co.uk/digital-cameras/1288933/olympus-pen-e-pm1http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepm1http://www.techradar.com/reviews/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/digital-slrs-hybrids/olympus-pen-mini-e-pm1-982071/reviewhttp://www.t3.com/reviews/olympus-e-pm1-reviewhttp://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/reviews/photo-video/3317941/olympus-pen-mini-e-pm1-review/http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/72677-olympus-e-pm1-pen-mini-camera-reviewhttp://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/cameras/review-olympus-epm1-pen-mini-20111226-1p9v1.html. Since there are no specific notability guidelines for cameras or products,  applies, which is met. Having said that, the current article is poor: unreferenced, lacking in hard information or 3rd-party coverage, full of vague unsupported assertions, inappropriate in tone for an encyclopedia, and close to advertising, so it would have to be almost entirely rewritten
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)