Deletion of List of fiction that breaks the fourth wall (4th nomination)

Comment: Just lists of loosely associated terms, fails #DIR by design
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'm going to jump into the lion's mouth on this one. I'm more than happy to delete listcruft and clear violators of #DIR, but I'm not terribly sure that this is either. Each one of them is well put together to varying degrees, the only thing that is preventing me from changing my position to "keep" is the complete lack of sourcing and the fact that it absolutely reeks of  violations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOR)

Comment: nomination is spot-on. These lists also risk arbitrariness per  and cannot aspire to an encyclopedic standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: Fiction which "breaks the fourth wall" is as common as dirt and has been for many years. That makes such a list an arbitrary subset of a boundless set of instances, and thus an indiscriminate list. The selections also lack any secondary source to say that they are important examples of breaking the fourth wall, making their selection as examples original research. I like it, but it is not encyclopedic and can be deleted as  and as an indiscriminate list violating 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOT)