Deletion of List of Urdu language book publishing companies

Comment: reasonable index of articles per  grouped by a significant shared feature. All we have so far are completely invalid arguments for deletion. We do not delete articles just because editors may add inappropriate content, such as spam (see  and ), and regardless it's laughable to think that the addition of a half dozen nonnotable listings over a three and a half year history (since removed by the nominator) pose too big a problem for us to monitor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:SUSCEPTIBLE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: I think it's possible to say that there should be a place to put these publishers. If spam and names without articles are a problem, then the obvious thing  to do is convert it to a category (). On the other hand, red links are listed as an advantage of lists because they show articles that need to be created (). Advantages and disadvantages to both. We have a long List of English-language book publishing companies, and they are all blue links. List of Romanian-language publishers is almost all red links. Usually we group publishers by country, but Urdu is both India and Pakistan, so do we need something by language? Or is it enough to list publishers in India and Pakistan? –&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:AOAC||WP:AOAL)