Deletion of St. Val's Mystery

Comment: per . Even if there is little sourcing (which is unlikely for a movie with over two million admissions), the movie has historical significance, attracting significant attention back then
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Meets . Context, or lack therof, is not a reason for deletion. First Huon's reasoning is sound and, next, most stub articles lack it. JB while there is nothing wrong with your nomination of this article for AFD I would suggest that, if you haven't read it before, you will want to take a look at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: of this as being the first film of Fernandel to be shot after the liberation of Paris. Topic meets . Certainly we do not have lots of modern press coverage for this film 70 years afer it was first released, but it is hard to believe that a film by one of France's film idols of the time did not get coverage back then, and it is covered in multiple books. I call . The https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=St._Val%27s_Mystery&type=revision&diff=659986645&oldid=648565269 132 character stub brought to AFD apparently without |due research was easy to expand to a  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Val%27s_Mystery  1620 character Start or C-class. Time for a DYK
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NTEMP||WP:BEFORE)