Deletion of Brian Garth

Comment: The delete 'votes' do not give good grounds for deletion. In-depth coverage in local sources is perfectly acceptable to demonstrate |notability of individuals. Redlinks exist to encourage editors to create articles, they do not demonstrate non-notability per se. The article already cites three very in-depth news articles about Garth in three different publications
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think there is enough here to meet the |GNG. From my research, Black Camaro is likely to be notable also, so it being a red link is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: First off, I would recommend providing as many references as you are able. Something that you might overlook could establish notability. The fact remains that this: http://www.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2004/06/23/cover_story/cover.txt is one sentence in an article. This article, for which he was on the cover was a mere promo gig: http://www.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2011/03/11/music/stories/iq_42794819.txt. I generally don't prefer to give more information about uting|my personal life here, but I think several people know my background. I served as VP of an organization and worked to promote the organization and individual for three years, using the same (and more) of the PR tools that you have used. I took the organization national, international, then left. Of course, not before writing my first article for which I had a significant |conflict of interest. As far as KNPR SON, I've been the scheduled guest twice and know the staff very well and how the shows operate. The interviews may be reliable, but they fail independence. Promotions included working with all the publications that you mention. There has also been two entire pages of a life bio in the LVRJ, Sun, and indepth reports on television. There has been a short three ep doc on cable and a full-length doc currently making the rounds at festivals. A book is in the works. Quoting a portion of your claim, "the mere fact that a publication would want to specifically bio Garth at the same time a radio station would, struck me as... " a promotional blitz for the indie festival. If you work with the band, keep doing what you're doing. Find a notable indie or major label. Bypass self-releasing your music. Get out of LV and generate some press and reviews that are not mere gig promotions. And good luck. Best regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:COI)

Comment: Two dozen articles/reviews are listed in this article, including one I found in the Las Vegas Sun from 2009 about the release of a new album. As a whole, I believe they demonstrate |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I can and will provide sources from multiple states on the subject if that is what is needed to prove notability outside of any one locality. The subject is from Las Vegas, so I used mostly Las Vegas sources as they were easier to research. However, I believe that by using these sources, notability is established under criteria 1. and criteria 7. of the |topical notability guidelines for bands and is certainly established under the |general notability guideline as well. Maybe I am unclear as to exactly how many of the guidelines the subject must qualify for under the |topical notability guidelines. I believe the subject of the article is at the forefront of the Las Vegas music scene as is implied by having been on the cover of that city's widest circulated weekly publication, and further evidence of his relevance to the music scene in Las Vegas can be verified by his multiple appearances on that city's public radio where the subject's opinion, specifically of that music scene, is the topic of concern for the broadcast.  When I find sources from other cities, will this page live
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:GNG||WP:BAND)