Deletion of Clayton Middle/High School

Comment: as failing , .  At very first glance I was going to agree (rare as that is) with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NN)

Comment: The nominator seems to be laboring under the misconception that this is a middle school. It is a combined middle AND high school. As the AfD was created within a mere three minutes of the article's creation, without any opportunity provided to expand the article beyond a stub, it would seem that this nomination is in staggeringly |bad faith
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: unless non-trivial coverage or |reliable sources documenting multiple notable alumni can be found. Also regarding the timing of the AfD: sources are not an afterthought which you go looking for a few days after you've created an article, they should be used for every single fact you put into the article in the first place starting from the first edit. Articles which lack sources and assertions of notability not only run the risk of being put up for AfD quickly, they run the risk of getting  immediately ''speedily'' deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as another |nn school
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Stop already with the 3 minutes.  From the time it was nominated until right now has been over 12 hours.  Instead of sitting on the AfD hitting refresh to every reply, get some |reliable sources and improve the article to keep it (although I highly doubt this Middle/High School is notable anyways -- listing links to the homepage of the school does not count for notability).  This article will '''NEVER''' survive if you just sit here arguing, without backing up your claim.  If you just recreated it for a different user, then it should be on them to assert it's |notability, but since you have been arguing over 12 hours on this, you apparantly have some sort of interest in the article.  Get in gear and work on the article instead of going back and forth and accomplishing nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: A system that places a gun at the head of any individual creating an article by allowing creation of an AfD within three minutes is unjustifiable. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alansohn&diff=138041125&oldid=137824127 The individual who requested the article has been adding sources and other material demonstrating notability to area schools and noticed that this article didn't exist. The burden is on the user who asked for this article to establish |notability. I don't blame the newbie who requested the article for backing away from this inherently destructive process and the abusive editors who won't tolerate a stub. Where are these perfect articles supposed to sprout from in under three minutes? What is your interest in deleting this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)