Deletion of Antisemitism in early Christianity

Comment: The sourcing, such as it is,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antisemitism_in_early_Christianity&oldid=567379515 does not support the topic of the article. The first source is about Fiscus Judaicus|a tax created by pagan Rome. The second source is about a modern interpretation of the New Testament, for which anti-Semitism and the New Testament|we already have an article. The third source is to an obituary of an academic who died recently, whose opinion in the fourth source is, again, on the topic of ''anti-Semitism and the New Testament''. The fifth source is to that same author's opinion regarding the need for Christian repentance about the 20th century Holocaust. The sixth is more or less talking about anti-Judaism. The seventh and final source is about how to translate a certain word from ancient Greek. It's all sound and thunder signifying nothing. If, as per the above "the topic is a the subject of much serious academic debate among theologians and historians" then why, after all these years, has there not been a single relevant source brought to bear on the article? And, now even after days of this deletion discussion, why hasn't anyone above who has voted "Keep" been able to muster a single relevant source? I'd strongly suggest the answer is that  is fully in play
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX)

Comment: the |consensus has become very |anti-FORK lately
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC||WP:FORK)

Comment: or '''Fix''' per . This must be seen as a spin-off article of Anti-Semitism and Christianity, but it's not done the right way. The spin-off article is supposed to be the more detailed one, and the main article shall include a summary of the spin-off. Here it's the opposite: The main article covers anti-Semitism in the early period and in the NT far more extensively than the spin-off, which is very light-weight and has very little historical facts; in addition to being very short, about half of it is made up of opinions of scholars about how anti-Semitism then relates to current days anti-Semitism. I have nothing in principle against a spin-off article for early Christianity if there is consensus that the main article is getting to long, but than it must be a real spin-off, adequately synchronized with the main article. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)