Deletion of List of supernova weapons in science fiction

Comment: could not find meaningful coverage to establish notability of subject of the list, thus it is  (also ). It is  unsourced as well, and many of the blue links do not have sources themselves for the fictional element in question.--Special:Contributions/70.80.234.196|70.80.234.196
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: I don't think the topic of supernova weapons in science fiction is notable, but if it would be the article would need to be rewritten from the ground up since what is given here is nothing but |trivia, and much of it appears to be original research. I would also oppose a merge as this type of writing isn't appropriate in any article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: per nom.  Though the article's content may be helpful at a science fiction wiki, it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: These are presumptively (i.e. blue-linked) notable elements of undoubtedly notable works, but I don't see that the thread brining them together is established by coverage in reliable sources rather than |original research.  That being the case this is not an appropriate topic for a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)