Deletion of Joan Melnick

Comment: Per  there is need for multiple, reliable sources - supporting links and sourcing is at best vague, unreliable, and unremarkable in origin.  Neither a Bachelor's nor a Master's degree substantiates notoriety.  No national or notable exhibition participation substantiated.  True peer review is unsupported
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: I am unable to find any significant coverage in reliable independent sources. This fails GNG for sure. Falling back on  or  I cannot see any reason the subject would satisfy it. I am particularly convinced by the explanation of Mduvekot above. In addition, none of the keep votes have actually provided any evidence that she is notable - and demonstrating notability requires verifiable evidence. I see none at the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: None of the sources provided rise to the level of significant critical attention. Fails . Some sources are press releases or announcements of exhibitions, not critical reviews. No museum collections, or exhibits in public galleries. I can't find anything that shows that the Second Intercollegiate exhibition of student art is a notable exhibition. when looking at the references, I find that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)