Deletion of C. T. Mathew

Comment: The subject apparently satisfies criterion #6 of  as he held the position of the director of a notable academic institution. However, none of the material, including the directorship is verifiable. I am willing to reconsider my !vote if somebody comes up with sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Which category of rof does he pass? I can't find a single citation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Essentially all information in the article fails . No evidence of satisfying either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: Although I can't find much else, I think the citation for Directorship of Calicut Dental College - can be judged sufficent to pass WP:Prof #6. By my reading of the article Prof Mathew seems highly notable within Keralan Dentistry: Head of the Department of Dentistry, founder-director of the Dental College, Professor of Post-Graduate studies in A.B. Shetty Institute of Dental Sciences, member of the Dental council of India and President of the Kerala Dental Council. I guess that most of his achievments are recorded in pre-internet sources in India and most of us would have difficulty in accessing these. These would all seem verifiable in principle. By my reading of  ''not everything need actually be attributed''.  ''requires that anything challenged or likely to be challenged'' needs sources. I guess my argument would be we have enough to satisfy WP:Prof #6 and that the rest is OK unless we have editors who wish challenge the truth of the rest of the claims and they should have requests for citations for those bits or that those bits (but not the whole article) be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)