Deletion of Afanc (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters.  Fails , but a reasonable search term
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: because "No subject is automatically or inherently notable merely because it exists" (). The sources only prove that it exists. Start with developing a section in a list, then start an article per . &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:AVOIDSPLIT)

Comment: non-notable as per , doesn't have any independent secondary source with significant coverage. Same opinion as Tarc on potential redirect (and in any case, I don't want it to be just a page blanking with the history kept intact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters, per .  This doesn't appear to have independent notability, but the content would fit fine there per .  Note also that delete !votes which do not explain why a merger is not an appropriate option are not policy-based reasons for deletion in light of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NNC||WP:ATD)