Deletion of Kesari Tours

Comment: As per nom, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: there is reasonable argument above and further highlight the importance of why Wikipedia policies/guidelines(or RULES) are not rigid. The company did indeed received an award but didn't meet   nor  as there's no significant, sustained coverage of the company in details. Thus the attempt to use only awards to argue its keeping is evidence that there is no DEPTH|significant coverage as the company is not notable thus the award perfectly serves as reason '''not''' have the article as reasoned above. Wikipedia is not place |to display awards received by company.  ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SOAP)

Comment: I reinstated the 2009 TravelBiz Monitor item which had been a reference in an early draft of this article, as it is probably the most substantial coverage. However neither it nor the various trade awards seem to me to be sufficient evidence that this is more than a company going about its business and is of |encyclopaedic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)