Deletion of Non-Muslim view of Ali (second nomination)

Comment: This is not a list of "random quotes" by "non-muslims". The people quoted are not just any non-muslims. They are ''Islamic scholars who are not muslims''. Most non-muslims are not Islamic scholars, and most Islamic scholars are not non-muslims, so this combination is somewhat special. (Also, most if not all would easily pass the notability test.) The quotes are not random, They are ''highly specific'' about Ali; how are they random quotes? Further, this is not a content fork but an "article spinout"; see Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles and also how this is actually ''recommended'' in Wikipedia:Summary style#Avoidance of POV splits. As such, the article nicely complements Sunni view of Ali and Shi'a view of Ali. As to the alleged violation of , that would be the case if some editor tried to keep others from editing his or her articles, for example by indiscriminately reverting others' edits, and refusing to engage in meaningful dialogue or attempts to reach consensus. None of this is evident in the article's history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: for better organization and less needless forking.  I like the content, but I don't see why it should be split off.  I also don't find it in violation of , although I can see the argument... other than http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-Muslim_view_of_Ali&diff=46208406&oldid=38313253, it seems that only
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)