Deletion of KUSW

Comment: The thrust of the "broadcast media" section of  is to argue, without using the controversial idea of "inherent notability", that most broadcasters are part of the local infrastructure and geography, in a way that other sorts of businesses are not.  While the essay does suggest creating a table before generating dozens of stub articles, this is not a stub.  Anyway, it looks like sources were found, so the AFD is moot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NME)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: nom is correct in that radio stations are not ''inherently'' notable, but this one seems to meet the |general notability guideline for having independent coverage from multiple sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia policy does NOT say "radio stations are automatically notable."  According to  the station must have a large audience, established broadcast history or unique programming, which is not demonstrated for this station.  There is nothing in the article that indicates notability of this station, so the article should be deleted, as there is nothing in a search to indicate notability of this station
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NME)