Deletion of Sivalinga as phallus

Comment: I created this during a cleanup effort by moving material |unduly impacting the Lingam article.  Currently, it consists of a predictably biased quote-farm; proper editing can fix this, as the issue is indeed a real one, philologically. Unfortunately,  the issue is also a radioactive one, and therefore a cruft magnet, which is why I think an article on this separate from Lingam is ''needed'' anyway.  Delete this one and in the fullness of time another one will appear for sure.  The correct approach is to make a proper article of it so that the WP-ecological niche remains occupied.  (I'm not partial to the current title; a better one would do nicely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: I think instead of overloading the main article, its better to have a article which discusses ''both the views'' in detail. I agree that the current version of the article is in bad shape, a does not mention all the POVs, but this can be improved. I have http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sivalinga_as_phallus&curid=26090097&diff=342482210&oldid=342312174 added a couple of them. We can improve this article with different views—for and against—and then we can |summarize the issues in the main article. I think we can also decide upon a better title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)