Deletion of Anthony Senecal (2nd nomination)

Comment: I looked through his article and noticed several sources listed to the same articles. I combined them, and you can see there are actually only 3 sources: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/05/donald-trump-butler-secret-service Vanity Fair, https://www.salon.com/2016/05/13/10_things_you_need_to_know_about_trumps_racist_ex_butler_who_threatened_obama_on_facebook/ Salon and http://time.com/4328717/donald-trump-butler-anthony-senecal/ Time. They do talk about Senecal at length, which could be enough to pass  for significant coverage in secondary sources if he continued to be discussed.  However, I'm voting delete because that seems to be a one-off event per , which states a person isn't notable "If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" (all three articles are from May 12-16, 2016, a period of 4 days, and discuss him only in context of his posts about Obama) or "If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual" (that's the case here) or "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented." I haven't seen anything to indicate that this event is significant. I don't think this would be considered significant enough even for an event article like The Facebook controversy of Trump's butler since it was only a blip in the news for a few days. This seems to be exactly the type of article that  says shouldn't be on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E)