Deletion of Inoculator

Comment: Albums, songs, and EP's don't have to meet ''every'' requirement on the notability list, so long as they meet one. I don't see a reason for this article to be deleted as there are sources from "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable." That includes Allmusic. Charting is therefore not a necessary requirement. For example, Out of Step (album) fails on all points of notability except for #1 (it has never charted, been certified gold, been a major theme song/major part of a movie, received national airplay, been subject of a national broadcast, or received a major award). However, it is certainly notable. For underground music such as punk and metal, mainstream exposure and national charts are not an indicator of notability. In addition, I find the comment that this article "'''must''' get out of the way of a lab inoculator and move" (emphasis mine) to be inappropriate, borderline ully|bullying, and an attempt to |own an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:OWN)

Comment: Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. There is no coverage about this ep in any of the existing independent reliable sources. The allmusic refs do not even verify the existence of the ep, let alone give it any non trivial coverage. Selective quoting of WP:MUSIC above seems disingenuous, leaving of "Has been the subject of". ( is the more appropriate guideline). Albums, songs, and EP's don't have to meet ''every'' requirement on the notability list, but they should meet one. This does not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)

Comment: There is nothing in the references quoted that establishes any notability under  or  - and that includes quoting from other WP articles! As an aside, Allmusic's aims are different to WP's and a mention in one does not establish a reason to list in the other
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NALBUM)