Deletion of Dimensional approach to personality disorders

Comment: Name change does not address fundamental issues with article and its content. Comments here by course instructor and ambassador indicate  may also be at play for article content.  Have not seen evidence supporting passage of .  Still support delete as nominator
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:GNG)

Comment: We have a whole bunch of edits from a whole bunch of editors and there's still no definition of the "dimension" / "dimensional" in the title that makes sense to me. I'm still dithering on whether this is  but clearly Gobonobo thinks it isn't. There are a ton of references, which might be related, but the only one I actually understand has been disputed. There could easily be an encyclopedia article in there someplace, but if there is, it's not being pointed at effectively by the text as it stands. I encourage those interested in saving the article to go for userfication while they write Dimension (medical diagnostics) and/or a decent section explaining dimensions in Medical diagnosis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Clearly notable, just needs some cleanup. Perhaps Dimensional models of personality disorders would be a better name for this, but this is a central concept in personality disorder classification (as opposed to a categorical approach) as seen http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219904/ here, especially in the Alternative Dimensional Models section. The top hits in http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dimensional+models+of+personality+disorders&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=1%2C24&as_sdtp=on this Google scholar search also demonstrate that this passes . If this is not written in a manner that is conducive to DYK that's fine, but that's not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)