Deletion of Patrick McKeown (2nd nomination)

Comment: Presently, the existing coverage of Patrick McKeown in reliable sources is not significant enough to meet the  or  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: Spark and Sobaka's interaction above make it clear that this individual is not notable, and even if some borderline notability can be established,  would serve to bar inclusion. Wikipedia is not the venue to promote this individual's works
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION)

Comment: Recognized expert in his field who often appears in the press in that capacity (mostly in the UK, Ireland and Australia). This is per  #7 "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area." I found so many with ProQuest it's too much to transfer here but contact  for verification. Below is one example from the ''Irish Times'' in which he is called an "expert", plus two other sources: a book review, and a source showing he has been influential
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:REX)