Deletion of API Chaining

Comment: There is no evidence of independence from the subject in the sources provided. The first source simply a link to the toolkit. As to the other two sources, without some more details, it seems like the creator spoke at one conference along with dozens of other speakers and then spoke again at a single seminar. The only independence it seems is because the conferences invited said speaker to speak.  is also an essay not a guideline, one that's been around for four years and never elevated and the reasoning here does not support elevating it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: I was unable to find any reliable sources discussing this technique. It is discussed in the blogs, but it is probably  for reliable sources to develop about this topic. Without any RS, even a selective merge to method chaining seems problematic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Does not meet  or . Cannot find any reliable sources on the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT)

Comment: Notwithstanding the accusations above, let's get back on topic and look at the merits of API chaining as a technique. As I pointed out before, there is something of interest here, but it's still too early to tell whether it will be widely adopted. As it stands, I would include it elsewhere as a short section under the article on API or simply delete as there is not enough  verifiable evidence to support it as an article in its own right. I would also suggest that another author aside from Orubel take this on to avoid 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:COI)