Deletion of Nahum Galmor

Comment: Most of the article's sources are not  but the allegations themselves are well documented: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3783959,00.html, http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1118415.html, http://www.nrc.nl/international/Features/article2485661.ece/Dutch_company_entangled_in_Israeli_fraud_case, http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/5206394/__Fosforfabriek_in_handen_maffia__.html?p=18,1(http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraaf.nl%2Fbinnenland%2F5206394%2F__Fosforfabriek_in_handen_maffia__.html%3Fp%3D18%2C1&sl=auto&tl=en translation), http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Nahum+Galmor etc. The subject appears to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The citations given in the non-controversy sections are enough to meet . The problematic controversy section does indeed need editing for NPOV, weasel words, etc. If that section were removed in its entirety there would be no reason to delete this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)