Deletion of Kanu Ikechukwu Anthony

Comment: without a conclusive determination of non-notability, for tone reasons, and doubts as to notability.  If the subject does satisfy |academic notability or |general notability, an article should be |written on a blank page.  This needs paving over
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:TNT)

Comment: Setting aside the accusations of racial bias in the nomination, his linked Google Scholar profile at first glance appears very strong for philosophy, enough for #C1. However, investigation shows that a large fraction of the citations to his works are self-citations, which would not count towards #C1. So I think we would have to look elsewhere for notability. For instance, is his journal ''Igwebuike'' a "major, well-established academic journal" as #C8 asks for? My guess is no. Does he have sufficient in-depth coverage in reliable sources (such as major national Nigerian newspapers) to pass  instead of ? The article doesn't make a case for that in its current state but I would prefer to reserve judgement in case this AfD can turn up better sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: There was an ordinary academic biography under the promotionalism, which wasn't hard to find. I'll hold off trying to make a judgment about wiki-notability, but regarding #C1, an h-index of 20 looks pretty good for philosophy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)