Deletion of Apokolips

Comment: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Collected_Jack_Kirby_Collector_Volume_1/KI-et-e206EC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=apokolips+kirby&pg=PA110&printsec=frontcover Hell Hath No Furies", a two-page article in ''The Collected Jack Kirby Collector, Volume 1'' (TwoMorrows Publishing, 2004) about the gender power balance on Apokolips. Yes, before you say that it's plot information, it does include descriptions and explanations of fictional material — and then it reflects on that material, doing textual analysis on a particular theme. That's what you do, when you write analysis of fiction. Similarly, the article "https://www.google.com/books/edition/Jack_Kirby_Collector_71/eDclDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=apokolips Love of Anti-? Life" in ''The Jack Kirby Collector'' #71 (2017) analyzes the meaning of several major Fourth World concepts, including Apokolips. Check out page 30: "No one on Apokolips evolves spiritually because there is no love. It is a stagnant society, its inhabitants living in ignorance, the legacy of oppression." This is also not plot information; it is lit-crit analysis. For my third of , ''https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Comics_Journal/VRRLAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=apokolips%20armed%20camp The Comics Journal'' #175 (March 1995) has an article about Kirby's work and influence. I can only see a snippet view, but the snippet of page 76 shows the first part of a passage that looks like analysis: "Kirby tells us what the citizens of Darkseid's realm feel about their lot in life: 'Apokolips is an armed camp where"... I think there's a good chance that that passage is going somewhere significant. I believe that this demonstrates that analysis of Kirby's work focuses on Apokolips as a significant concept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: or redirect as lacking real-world coverage to pass the , and also create something that's #PLOT. This location can be covered in the context of the stories in which it appears, and does not support a stand-alone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: to Darkseid per -R.  This is definitely a valid search term that should take the reader somewhere relevant.  I could be persuaded to go keep if good evidence is brought here, but I don't have the energy to go looking for it.  Maybe someone highlighted the design somewhere... For now, I just wanted to at least state that outright deletion is not necessary
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: or delete - Being a prominent setting is not indicative of coverage in sources. Wikipedia is no longer a site that covers fiction for the sake of covering fiction like in the 2005-ish era. Sources need to be provided to meet  and fulfill 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WAF)