Deletion of Roadmap (software)

Comment: per nomination.  |Yet more |"project management" software without any claim to the sorts of significance that would make this product an encyclopedia subject.  And if it's also a business startup, it's pretty axiomatic that it's not notable, even if there is a flurry of press coverage for the |single event of the business being launched
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:B2B||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources  to establish notability as required by .  The sources offered are all primary or unreliable blogs.  I do applaud all entrepreneurs who take it upon themselves to create products.  But as a rule of thumb, what you need to satisfy notability requirements here is a couple decent articles about the product in print sources with some editorial control.  This article does not have that.  And with such a generic product name, if the http://www.ppmroadmap.com/about-roadmap Co-Founder & CTO, who's been heavily involved in creating the page, doesn't know of any coverage, I doubt both that it exists and / or that if it did, any of us could find it.  Wikipedia is not for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PROMOTION)