Deletion of Glossary of Internet-related terms

Comment: List of notable WP articles and as such perfect navigational aid, compliant with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: WP:Lists (which is also MOS:LIST) shows that list-based articles comprising a list of related WP articles is a valid sort of article. It explicitly indicates glossaries are one allowed/encouraged type of list-based article. The entries should be ''encyclopedically explanatory definitions'', i.e., not just dictionary definitions. Many of the definitions in this article do have encyclopedic content, as they are not just about the word, e.g., ''ADSL''. Other entries are short and could be expanded through normal editing. A valid type of list-based article that looks well formatted and with no insurmountable problems, per , suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: Glossaries are valid per  and the draft Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Glossaries. However, this is not merely a glossary but also a list of articles. It is related to Index of Internet-related articles and Outline of the Internet, but it doesn't appear to be redundant with any other list, so it could be allowed to remain as a list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L)