Deletion of Blastoise

Comment: to List of Pokémon (1–20) - Does not establish |notability as there is not significant coverage in secondary sources. A species of Pokémon is not notable because of cursory mentions and blurbs from in-universe guides. As with any other article (on Pokémon or any topic), this article can be changed from a redirect if secondary sources arise that show this particular Pokémon has had impact in the real world
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to List of Pokémon (1–20) -  Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent secondary sources needed to  establish |notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: this article makes critical claims about the Pokemon's popularity, why it's well-known, and analyzes the character's role in the game (akin to Mario#Abilities or the plethora of articles on :Category:Chess openings|Chess openings), this is all referenced to a third-party publication about Pokemon as a whole that devoted three pages to Blastoise which meets 's definition of ''significant coverage'', "more than trivial, but less than exclusive", and supported with details from third-party guides (now). Additionally, throwing the phrase "in-universe" in front of ''guide'' does not somehow make it less reliable according to , since these guides are not describing the games as if the pokemon world is a real place that claim is just patently false. --&#65279
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)