Deletion of List of positive integers and factors

Comment: per  (without merging, as the added content over the existing articles is, as Arthur Rubin already states, unmaintainable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:REDUNDANTFORK)

Comment: What happened to  C2 "If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: egregious violation of  ("Excessive listings of unexplained statistics"); also a duplicate of Table of prime factors which I'm not sure has any rationale to exist.  This probably could have been a speedy delete; Buaidh has over 100000 edits and should know better - the article being new is not an excuse to keep a duplicate article here ("withhold judgement for a few weeks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as a  . Beyond 1000 (the greatest number in Table of prime factors), it is not entirely clear where we should draw the line, as such a list could continue ''ad infinitum'' with increasingly sparse useful information. Furthermore, many of the numbers listed here are not mentioned at all in 1000 (number), 2000 (number), etc. and do not exist as redirects, which is a strong indication that they are not notable. As such, the distinction column is left blank, or is filled with information which is not clearly related to factors, as the article title would otherwise suggest. Per {{u|Arthur Rubin}}, there is a lot of content in these lists that is redundant, and for the List of positive integers and factors/5|fifth list especially, there really isn't much said that is nontrivial (i.e. that would satisfy  or factorizations that one could determine easily) and not already at 8000 (number) or 9000 (number
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:REDUNDANTFORK||WP:1729)