Deletion of Kyle Kulinski (4th nomination)

Comment: He failed  at the last deletion discussion and unfortunately nothing has changed. Nothing I can find that's both substantial and independent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per , would an editor please list the best 3 sources which provide substantial, independent, secondary coverage of the article subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: clearly passes  and he is a well known political journalist who also got fame for criticising Trump's administration. Wikipedia has a list of articles about commentators and journalists who might not have even passed . The subject is notable enough but the article needs much improvement and work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: If you don't like how the previous AFD ended, the same editor who nominated it shouldn't be able to do it yet again a month later.  This is ridiculous!  This should be closed for wasting everyone's time.  Also the article says he has over 645 million YouTube views, so he easily passes the subject specific guideline for . "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)