Deletion of Back to the Future timeline (3rd nomination)

Comment: Mostly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per . This is all in-universe plot summary with no independant real-world analysis (besides a smidge of speculation by some guy in the "Theory" section). Seriously, the films aren't ''that'' complicated, and it's not what Wikipedia is here for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: per Wikipedia:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED.  The article is notable, encyclopedic, and well-sourced.  It is a notable and popular enough topic that, if deleted, it would only resurface again shortly after.  There's no  here; much of it is simple restatement of things given in an original source.  There is no thesis presented, thus there is no research pushed forward
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  and . This list is a combination of fictional elements and historical facts, but together they make an original synthesis. The article subject (the actual timeline of the movies) has not been demonstrated to be notable independently of the movies themselves, and the subject is already sufficiently dealt with in the context of the individual Plot sections in each movie article. '''EDIT''' And now that the article has been appropriately transwikied, the reasons to keep this article here are even less
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:OR)