Deletion of AA20 (2020 film)

Comment: As per , If The Hindu itself is not a verfiable source, then I guess no source in India is verifiable, we have to delete all the pages created based on them. The film itself is notable enough, because of behind the scenes drama and all and even the production is started on the film. What else is needed to keep an article in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: ping|Saichaitanya4496}}  says that we shouldnt have articles based on assumption that something will become notable in the future. I am not sure which Hindu article you are talking about, but https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/allu-arjun-pairs-up-with-rashmika-mandanna-in-aa-20/article29830116.ece this source doesnt say the shooting of the film has begun. I couldnt find any other wp:rs|reliable source stating that the shooting/principal photography has begun. All I could see was "the shooting ''will begin'' without Allu Arjun on the set, and he will join it afterwards. If there are sources saying it has begun, then kindly let me know. But until then, the film fails |notability guidelines for future films, and shouldnt have an article. However, this is not the only policy. We can also keep the article if the films passes wp:gng|general notable criteria. But it requires |sustained coverage of the film in reliable sources. So far, most of the coverage of film is from telly sites/gossip sites. Other than that, we have press releases, |routine coverage about the film, and some passing (but not significant) coverage of the film where something else is being covered. But the film itself lacks wp:sigcov|significant coverage. Also per nom. —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:NFF||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: WP:TOOEARLY . Not now maybe close to the release of the film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)