Deletion of Christ (Lithograph)

Comment: some to Odilon Redon, though in fact any work by a major artist like Redon is likely to pass , even if this doesn't emerge from a quick google search. I very much doubt there is any OR here - copyvio or just poor referencing to sources used is far more likely. The editor does not understand the subject very well; obviously the SF museum has only 1 copy of this print, and does not need mentioning. But some of the biographical stuff is sufficiently well-refed to be useful to add
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: or possibly merge to Odilon Redon, with substantial trimming). Much of the article is unrelated to the work, and the content that actually describes it is completely unsourced aesthetic descriptions, which violate 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)