Deletion of Laurel Mall

Comment: Without substantial third-party sources it fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Could be worked on quite a bit, but as far as  goes, it had an entire Washington Post article written about it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: No assertion of notability.   is not reason to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)