Deletion of Sarah Schaack

Comment: meets  and per article improvements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Revisions contributed by {{U|David Eppstein}} have established she meets , without question. My thanks for making this an easy call
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think the article about her in ''Nature'', the Fulbright scholarship, and her high citation record (#C1) add up to notability. But as the nominator said, "Getting an NSF grant and tenure does not qualify one to get a Wikipedia page" — the article was previously written in a way that emphasized those picayune details, rather than anything that made Schaack notable. I have rewritten it to be shorter but I hope also to make notability clearer. As for the h-index, I am more interested in the top end of the citations (her https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=02U6g_UAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao Google scholar profile shows five publications with over 100 citations each) than in how many lower-level ones she has
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)