Deletion of Isabella Mary Gainsford

Comment: Per  "individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article ''even if they are known solely for such a relationship'', but only if they pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability is , so people aren't automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because of who they happen to have been married to, but nohing stated here demonstrates that she has any standalone notability — even most of the ''sources'' are more about her husband than her per se. and the relatively few that are actually about her still aren't really making a strong case that she needs her own article. GNG is not, and never has been, just "count the footnotes and keep anybody who happens to surpass an arbitrary number" — it most certainly ''does'' still test the sources for the ''context'' of what they're covering the person ''for'', and things like being the guest of honour at a fundraising banquet and receiving birthday wishes from a friend (even a notable friend) are not inherently noteworthy contexts
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)