Deletion of Bloxers

Comment: Pure  for a product never put into production with the usual Kickstarter-like buzzspeak to distract that a mainstream product like this is likely already on the market
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)

Comment: Hmmm. I've been keeping an eye on this article out of curiosity. Not surprised it came to AFD. There was a lot of international media flurry in July 2015. At least two French articles - http://www.leshommesmodernes.com/bloxers-sous-vetement-erections/, http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/07/14/des-calecons-anti-erection-bientot-en-vente; Italian http://letteradonna.it/179220/bloxers-boxer-per-nascondere-erezione-video/, Indonesian http://www.yangmuda.com/read/detail/2222460/bloxers-pakaian-dalam-yang-paham-kebutuhan-cowok, and Dutch http://www.telegraaf.nl/gezondheid/24271252/__Nieuwe_onderbroek_kan_erectie_verhullen__.html, alongside dozens of English language articles. So there was definitely a flurry of international interest in mid-July, but it is clearly |too soon and pretty much equivalent to a |single event. Enough for a mention in Boxers at this point, but let's see if they're still getting coverage a year or so later. For now, '''merge''' and if they continue the way they've started, then an article sounds like a good idea, but for now - TOO SOON
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: as per nom and above editors. At best , and definitely too promotional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)