Deletion of List of management consulting firms (2nd nomination)

Comment: Nom has made a very ointy nomination after two of his wholesale deletions of article content were reverted and explained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per spam magnet as well as #DIRECTORY. Also, a term like "management consulting firm" is so vague that every new startup will try to get on this page. I tag these types of articles (about "management consulting firm" companies, not this list) all the time; probably 20% of my speedy tags. While there are some cases for categories as well as lists to exist and overlap, I do not feel this is one of them. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This nomination has no validity at all. Management consulting firms are obviously notable, listing them is sensible. Issues with spam can be dealt with by normal editing. WuhWuzDat seems to be unaware of  and needs a good trouting for making this kind of nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: While I agree that the data could be more concise and better organized, deletion is not the best route to achieve that result.  Cleanup tags would be sufficient; or, better yet, cleaning up the content or converting it into a wiki-table (as the nom also suggested) would be more productive routes.  The existing basic structure appears to meet .  Additionally, the argument of the list being a spam magnet seems to be mitigated by the list having clear inclusion criteria that all of the firms listed at this time are meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:CORP)