Deletion of Levallois-Perret attack

Comment: Even though article was created just after this attack, Nom would have done better to have waited a few months as per .  Notable attack that meets those criteria of  that can be measured at this point: there has been  of  the attack in both national and international press (I just added two days of reported coverage from Paris in the Wall Street Journal to page).  Perp is in hospital in police custody so there will be a trial, no CRYSTALBALL is needed to know that the trial will generate coverage.  And '''Note''' that this is one of an extraordinary series of similar attacks on French soldiers on domestic patrol duty in France in peacetime, including the June 2017 Champs-Élysées car ramming attack, 2017 Notre Dame attack, April 2017 Champs-Élysées attack, March 2017 Île-de-France attacks, Louvre machete attack.  Give that we ''kept'' each of the previous, similar attacks, I suggest that it is not Groundhog Day (film)|Groundhog Day  and we accomplish nothing by having this discussion this  every time a similar attack targets French security patrols
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:NCRIME||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: No  impact has been established from the brief news cycle. Any arguments about the possibility of coverage for a trial is . May I also remind everyone mention of the outcome of said trial is . Here is an essential line from  which !voters should take into consideration: "Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance. News organizations have criteria for content, i.e. news values, that differ from the criteria used by Wikipedia and encyclopedias generally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:ROUTINE||WP:EVENTCRIT)