Deletion of Tommy Möller

Comment: Regarding the poor quality that a couple of editors speak about. Poor quality is emphatically ''not'' a reason for deletion. It is a reason to {{tl|sofixit}} and  the article. If it is really unsalvageable, the thing to do is to IFY in or order to  the information and rewrite the article. Special:Contributions/Victor_falk|''walk
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPROVE||WP:STUB||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: As a frequent political commentator in the media looks like passes #7 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: There may be a national divide here; in America, almost every academic is a professor of some kind. In European nations, such as the United Kingdom or Sweden, "professor" is used to refer to what Americans refer to as a "university professor", and normally is a "chaired" position. As such, this chap easily fulfils . The pdf provided by Killiondude (a ''government report'' gives more-than-significant coverage of the fellow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: We've had a debate on his notability on the page, no-one has been able to show that he is notable. He does not fulfull , but may be notable some other way, but no arguments or support for such notability has arisen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: despite the best efforts of the editors, what have we got? A Sweedish professor who comments on Sweedish polics? Huge amount of TLDR research and that's the best? Sorry, this '''doesn't even assert notability''' much less establish it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:ARS)