Deletion of Alexander Fiske-Harrison (2nd nomination)

Comment: Yes, the article needs .  But it might seem that |despite no one doing so, it has possibilities, as the man and his theatrical works have been covered in |reliable sources: http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/content/camden/hamhigh/whatson/story.aspx?brand=NorthLondon24&category=whatsontheatre&tBrand=northlondon24&tCategory=whatson&itemid=WeED20%20Jul%202007%2010%3A19%3A29%3A770 ''Hampstead and Highgate Express'', http://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/review.php/20957/the-pendulum ''The Stage'', http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2008/jun/09/theatre1 ''The Guardian'',  http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/the_way_we_live/article6962019.ece ''The Times'',http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/6000143/Alexandra-Tolstoy-taking-research-seriously.html ''The Telegraph'', http://www.timeout.com/london/theatre/reviews/5534/the_pendulum.html ''Time Out'', and http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/the-future-pentameters-theatre-london-img-srchttpwwwindependentcouktemplatevergfxthreestargif-altthreestar-456686.html ''The Independent''.  It seems also that he also a writes for http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2008/09/anobledeath/ ''Prospect'' (magazine), http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/if_we_could_talk_to_the_animals ''Frieze'' (magazine), and    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/more_sport/article6725612.ece ''The Times''.   And I'll have to do a search to see if his http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Alexander+Fiske-Harrison%22 books get reviewed.  If there had been only one or two articles about this fellow, I would not opine keep. Time to finally fix, yes... but not to toss
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:RE)

Comment: Convenient that Alexander |just left messages for four users who voted to keep his articles in the past
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Looks like I mixed up my ''Pen''dulum with ''Pen''tameter. Still though. And the other point remains, it ''is'' |canvassing. Why didn't you comment to all the people who thought your article should be deleted the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alexander_Fiske-Harrison first time it came up
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Apologies for loss of temper. However, I quote from |general notability guideline, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." There is no way anyone could possibly claim that this standard has no been achieved and far surpassed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)