Deletion of Full chemical name for titin

Comment: Useless?  Well, for one thing, you could try testing the visual editor with it, eh?  Browsing for sources, there seem to be lots of people out there having trouble putting this famous word into their documents.  If we can handle it, then we perform a valuable service in making it available.  The topic is obviously an adjunct or appendix to the main article about titin and, per  it seems sensible to split onto this separate page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE)

Comment: or ''Migrate''' 90% of wikipedia could be classified as "Trivia"  and useless. If anything this opens up curious minds to the world of Chemical naming lexicography and should be on this page as to WHY the name is so long. Or migrate this to the article on chemical lexicography as the longest, but, again, because of   this article should stand alone as a stub    — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/166.77.6.8|166.77.6.8
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE)

Comment: to WikiSource.  Wikipedia simply |is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  Thus, using an article for the full name of something is inappropriate to Wikipedia's encyclopedic nature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)