Deletion of Shirley Wu

Comment: This AfD discussion has generated plenty of heat, alas not so much light... I haven't seen a single persuasive argument as to why this should be kept, nor is there anything in the article which conclusively demonstrates notability, not alone and not even when all is added up. It boils down to a somewhat promotional piece (with heavy refbombing) on a person doing their job, for which they've received some non-notable recognition. Fails  / , and more to the point fails to convince me that this article is needed in an encyclopaedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Nothing presented above convinces me otherwise. I did my due diligence - this subject doesn't pass . The majority of sourcing is self-published or primary source material. And winning an award or writing some papers doesn't convince me they merit inclusion at this time. The subject does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: per part 3 of ; her collective body of work (book, Bussed Out viz, Hamilton viz, Data Sketches project) appear well-known in the data visualization and data journalism communities, as evidenced by multiple reliable, independent sources that cover both of those domains (Digital Arts, Net Magazine, Fast Company) and a number of independent "articles" (read: podcasts/videos/interviews) that review her work (storytellingwithdata, frontendmasters, reactiveconf, Spotify's Anchor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST)