Deletion of Bike Shaped Object

Comment: While this article does have good information on bike recalls, all that information would fit better in separate article(s) as it has nothing to do with the |neologism itself. In the ELs, the Guardian article is part of a blog, the BBC news story does not mention the term outside the comments, and all of the other links are blogs. The only inline citation in the first paragraph links to Urban Dictionary which is not a reliable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: WP:NEO|Neologism that lacks sufficient  to |verify that it meets  … also violates . Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{User|70.21.16.94
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:NOR)

Comment: The references don't support the subject... Urban dictionary cannot seriously be considered a reliable source, but the Guardian article in the external links certainly is. If that and other |reliable sources can be worked into the main body of text, the article would be fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)