Deletion of Smarketing

Comment: but it is good this article was AfD-ed, since it was entirely , with promotional links to marketers hawking Smarketing. The spam is removed, |reliable sources added. Notability is established with articles in marketing and sales publications devoted entirely to Smarketing. Not a neologism; term apparently has been in use since 2000. Sources include http://www.business2community.com/b2b-marketing/b2b-smarketing-5-steps-make-sales-marketing-work-together-0831644#!5zaBn B2B Smarketing: The 5 Steps To Make Sales and Marketing Work Together, http://www.salesandmarketing.com/content/%E2%80%98smarketing%E2%80%99-rescue?page=77 ‘Smarketing’ to the rescue, http://modernmarketingtoday.com/smarketing-the-convergence-of-social-sales-and-marketing/ Smarketing: plus this one, http://socialmediatoday.com/aaron-d-rains/1491736/what-smarketing another one, generally notable subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:REFSPAM||WP:RS)

Comment: Per . This is apparently a non-notable neologism of the portmanteau variety which, with Wikipedia's help, may soon be notable and help lead interested prospects to web sites such as smarketingtx.com. The article is sourced to tweets, blogs, and self-published web sites. This reminds me of Explainer video which quickly became a magnet for all manner of spam. No thanks. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:GNG)