Deletion of Higher Earth

Comment: I tagged this for notability not 3 hours ago, and am unconvinced of the subject's notability. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of single run comics with similar coverage; they |should not all have articles. If  this goes on to be a major series and/or win major awards, it can be recreated.&nbsp;—&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: Although one of the authors is notable, this specific series is not *yet*.  Suggest userfy until notability of the series itself can be established.  Otherwise, delete *for now* 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Not all newly published comics get coverage.  The coverage mentions another hit series the person came up with.  This comic sold out its first printing and had to order a second.  None of this matters though.  If something gets this sort of coverage in reliable sources, then its notable enough for a Wikipedia article.  That's how it works.  See .  Every film that gets to the theater has similar coverage, and you don't go around deleting film articles because you don't think the movie is important enough to ever have a sequel
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Highly notable per  and the 9 references currently in the article (many more could be added). An unusually popular work, selling out a week before it was even released, and with a reliable source noting it had "rave reviews" only days after the first issue came out.  Nothing gained by destroying this quality, harmless and interesting article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Weak" because these sources I cite below are somewhat uncertain regarding how strongly they correlate to source reliability in terms of Wikipedia's guidelines for sources (at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE)