Deletion of Maqsudul Alam

Comment: Notability isn't clear based on  - I couldn't find any good sources in English (I see  is ok with non-English sources, though). If the consensus ''is'' to keep in the end, the article needs to be cut down to the bare minimum - as it is, it's mostly just copied and pasted from Alam's http://www.hawaii.edu/microbiology/Alam/people/alam.html homepage. The https://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%B8%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%B2_%E0%A6%86%E0%A6%B2%E0%A6%AE Bengali wiki page might be a good starting point for this, but I can't tell
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NONENG)

Comment: Has put out some genome papers but during a kind of "gold-rush" era where any sequenced genome with minimal analysis was rewarded with a high-impact publication. Additionally, Nature papers alone do not a notable academic make — in my view, the subject does not hit any of the prof test criteria at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: passes  and , sources http://archive.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2010-06-19/news/72004, http://www.amardeshonline.com/pages/printnews/2012/09/24/165305
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: The article is very poorly written (I mean only the lede, everything else is copy paste from some CV). But there are significant enough references in the article. Dr. Alam is (strongly) notable in national scope for his contributions in government backed genome projects of jute etc. and passes . As of now, the article should be stripped down to a stub cleaning up all ''CV like'' text. –&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)