Deletion of Michel Von Tell

Comment: ping|Adniim}} if you'll scroll up a bit from the part of  that says "Has a large fan base", you'll notice that it's part of a section that starts out with "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." This means that even if a subject meets the criteria of , they still have to meet the requirements of |the general notability guideline. Also, you left out a key part of the sentence "Notable" in the sense of being 'famous' or 'popular'"—the sentence finishes with "– although not irrelevant – is secondary." This means that having had major roles in notable films and having a fan base are relevant, but they cannot be the ''primary'' evidence of notability. Please note that this is just a comment. I'm not arguing to delete this article or to keep it—I'm trying to help you better understand the relevant policies so that you know exactly what would be needed to prove notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: He is not notable and fails  or . Man, this AfD is a total mess
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)