Deletion of Controversy of the Born This Way Ball (2nd nomination)

Comment: The topic of the article, as exposed from the large amout of coverage of each controversy, is defined. In my personal opinion, I don't overly see a breach of : That would be the case of a single controversy within the whole tour. Here, we have a set of several controversies that are the direct consequence of a recurrent factor: her performance within the context of the tour. Although, I am pretty sure that such controversies would have also existed aside the context of the tour, because Gaga herself is a point of controversy. Therefore, this can be easily explained at a separate article wich aviods to have a large portion on the main tour article about this, and each section there is given due weigh in space there. It also allows the needed space to elaborate in detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and #NEWS: "Discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic." Any important facts can be merged into the main article in the appropriate section, there is no need for a whole bulk of information that breaches Wikipedia's #NEWS policy and gives undue weight to the topic in question
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)