Deletion of Edward Francis Anhalt

Comment: I can't see any reason to believe the draft was a hoax. Though neither can I see a great deal to convince me the subject meets . If the nominator withdraws this AfD, maybe the article should be moved back to AfC to allow the author to improve it. If Cunard had doubts about the article's validity, they shouldn't have moved it to main space
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm in general agreement with DGG here. The subject fails  as a prof and  as a local official. Mining the local newspapers for passing mentions of him in various local events does not amount to satisfying ; it's simply Wikipedia:Bombardment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: per .  The present version has enough significant coverage by independent reliable sources in the references.  The new sources add a lot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I found and added more referenced material for the article (reference numbers 1,12,13,29,30,33,34 in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edward_Francis_Anhalt&oldid=509591877 tis version - some not linkable online and somehttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-118441298.html http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/111080579.html are). I didn't fully mine the references I added to the article for content to add to the article and I think that is true of the other references in the article. In otherwords, the article could be expanded significantly from the sources now listed in the article. He's basically a community organizer (since at least 1995) and, as a community organizer, the newspapers covered him and the events he organizes since 1995. He's done a lot of things that resulted in the biographical topic received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject. Clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I haven't completed a full investigation of all these citations in the article, but as discussed above, this is certainly not a |hoax.  Many of the sources them appear to exist and provide |independent coverage of the subject, particularly in regard to his company, Banking on Kids.  The independent sources I've found so far, currently in the article, appear to fulfill .  Note:  I've also identified many sources that are not independent, but nonetheless verify important claims made about the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:GNG)