Deletion of Paris Hilton Responds to McCain Ad (2nd nomination)

Comment: the nominator seems to be suggesting a merge rather than a delete. Merge proposals can be discussed on talk pages rather than here. "This content can be covered elsewhere" is not a valid reason to delete a page, I think it is a very valid application of the official guideline 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARIZE)

Comment: for goodness sake, and ignore all the comments based on IDONTLIKEIT or that do not actually look at how the matter is covered by the sources.  The article easily meets all the notability criteria - thousands (perhaps tens of thousands) of news stories in every major outlet.  So this is a matter of trying to defeat notability of an article that meets the formal criteria.  The arguments I see are NOT#NEWS, Recentivism, and POV.  Starting with the first two the coverage of the matter continues daily with no sign of abating in the past two months - perhaps it is expanding.  Some random examples in a few seconds of googling.http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/features/20081025-9999-1n25popelect.htmlhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27092444/http://www.news24.com/News24/Entertainment/Celebrities/0,,2-1225-2108_2415573,00.htmlhttp://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20235476,00.html Any claim that it is just a flash in the pan is .  There is no way to know.  For now it is still going strong after two months.  Regarding POV, that implies a duplicate of material covered elsewhere in order to create a biased pov.  However, this is a real phenomenon, a video production.  There is no fork implied by covering it one place or another, simply a question of where to organize the material.   We cover Parody advertisement | spoof commercials / political satire / Internet Memes and the like.  Whether you like her or not, Hilton is a public personality and an actress.  The video is more than an aspect of her life, it is is a work in which she happens to act.  Although Hilton may ''star'' in the video, but she did not make it, she did not write it, she did not film it, and she did not produce it.  Much of the coverage goes to the people who actually did make the view, for example director Adam McKay.  There are also aspects of cultural events, of the election, and of McCain's image. It would be unusual to merge an actor's appearances in works with their BIO article.  Merging it into any parent article is arbitrary and makes it inaccessible and hard to navigate from the other subjects.   Like most pieces of creative content it represents the intersection of many people's efforts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: garnered media attention, but covered in the parent article and per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)