Deletion of The Watchers Series

Comment: u|Reinadelmundo11}}: The wonderful thing about Wikipedia is that almost nothing is set in stone. ''If'' the books attract significant third party coverage, sufficient to meet the standards laid out at |our notability guidelines, we can always write an article. In the mean time, this doesn't belong here (and you, as someone with a conflict of interest, don't belong writing the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia is first and foremost an encyclopedia, not a place for |marketing, and as such article subjects have to be |notable, as shown by |reliable sources independent of the subject. If this series meets that standard in the future, it can and should have an article, though not one written by anyone with a direct connection, as that would be a |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:COI)

Comment: There's no actual coverage of the series as a whole. I tried to see if there was any coverage for the author herself, but there isn't anything out there for her as a whole other than http://www.ldsmag.com/www.meridianmagazine.com/books/071107eden.html one magazine review and that's not enough to show notability per  or . I've got a fairly detailed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:NBOOK)