Deletion of Sony Ziris

Comment: FuFoFuEd has found coverage, and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I spent 30 minutes evaluating this for a close but wimped out so I'll !vote instead. The nominator's concerns about  are valid but that can be fixed by normal editing. I found Hrafn's delete argument completely unconvincing because there's a difference between "sources" used to cite information in the article and "sources" used to demonstrate notability at AFD (the latter doesn't even need to be in the article, it's enough that coverage exists) and I don't see how  comes into play here. However, of all the sources presented here only http://proavmagazine.com/videowalls/not-just-a-videowall.aspx?page=4 this one comes close to being a |supersource. The http://proavmagazine.com/digital-signage/sonys-new-ziris-software-manages-up-to-5000-scree.aspx other from the same magazine looks like a press release but I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. The rest don't look like significant coverage but again, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. Now for something that is just my opinion. A decent argument for inclusion based on this level of sourcing could be made for an open source project but I think the bar needs to be a little higher for commercial software
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:NBOOKS||WP:SUPERSOURCE)

Comment: It's a very useful product that has become notable in the way that it is used and easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)