Deletion of Shams-ul-Fuqara

Comment: There is a veritable forest of these non-notable books all being created and defended by the same group of accounts created within days of each other, but this article is the worst example of promoting a recently published, non-notable book for commercial gain. The first edition was only published two years ago according to the article itself (hope that answers {{ping|Раціональне анархіст}}'s question) so it isn't connected to the historical figure, but rather is a modern attempt to cash in on Sultan Bahoo's legacy. Every single citation seems to somehow be connected to the publisher Sultan-ul-Faqr Publications Regd., itself non-notable and with an article probably deserving of deletion. There seems to be virtually no information about this book independent from sites and organizations tied to this religious revival movement or the publishers; this is a not notable book that fails , and if it can't even pass that then it's a huge failure. The fact that the article about this non-notable subject is also a major violation of  just makes it come off as an attempt to generate publicity for a commercial product. This article needs to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTADVERTISING)