Deletion of Jerry Mandy

Comment: per Lugnuts and .  Information in article is verifiable (search ""Jerry Mundy" film" at Books) and useful.  While his roles were certainly mostly minor, he is credited in a large number of movies he appeared in, contrary to the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: per . His acting might not have caused huge biographies to be written about him but there is sufficient coverage in multiple sources that notability is established (examples: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/14356560/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/14356599/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/14356602/). Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: As the subject had a career spanning more than 20 years, across 140 films. As he was active mainly in the 1920s and 1930s, online sources can be hard to come by. Therefore, to |counter systemic bias, there must be some sort of notability of having a profilic pre-WWII career. In other words, if this was a modern-day person, there would be plenty of articles, online and in the press, about someone with this number of films to their credit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)