Deletion of Nick King (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article very vague and does not clearly indentify who this "Nick King" is. Nick is a very common name, and so is King. This article isn't encyclopedic at all; it serves no purpose other than to promote the person to people who have heard of him. What is the point of a Wikipedia article if a reader has to go to a search engine and try to determine who this person is anyway? This article has no citations, no external links, no Wikilinks, very little information, and although I'm not a big fan of deletion of poorly written articles with no reason other than the way they are written, this article makes no assertion of notability, it serves no purpose to anybody, is promotional, makes Wikipedia look like it is written by third graders (no offense to any little kids out there), and seems to fall under multiple |CSD criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)