Deletion of Lucy Hartley

Comment: Her second book just came out last July, and I'm sure will also attract published reviews. Until it does, the case is a bit borderline for  and , and even more so for . But I'm choosing weak keep instead of weak delete because the trajectory is in the right direction
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BIO1E||WP:PROF)

Comment: Hartley's book, ''Physiognomy'', is held by https://www.worldcat.org/title/physiognomy-and-the-meaning-of-expression-in-nineteenth-century-culture/oclc/705792841&referer=brief_results around 275 libraries and has been reviewed in https://muse.jhu.edu/article/40015 ''Victorian Studies'', https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250892415_Book_Review_of_%27Physiognomy_and_the_Meaning_of_Expression_in_Nineteenth-Century_Culture%27_by_Lucy_Hartley ''Annals of Science'', http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.10138/abstract ''Journal of the History of Behavioural Sciences'', http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/374120 ''Isis A Journal of the History of Science Society'', https://academic.oup.com/res/article-abstract/54/213/139/1524279/Review-Physiognomy-and-the-Meaning-of-Expression?redirectedFrom=PDF ''RES The Review of English Studies'', so meets  for its own wikiarticle, whether this is enough or there are other sources that warrant a standalone for Hartley i will leave it for others
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)