Deletion of 1633 Chimay

Comment: to the appropriate list of minor planets. I can't see anything in Google scholar that covers this object in-depth rather than merely as an entry in a table. I agree with the nominator that it does not appear to pass 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: We already have a good table and an image in the article, which would be lost if the page was deleted or redirected. Google scholar picks up a few  that could be used to expand the stub. And WP:Astro practice is to keep all the articles on low-numbered asteroids, which typically have close to a century of observations on them. I'm not sure what these nominations are about, but it seems to be some kind of bizarre . -- Special:Contributions/120.23.176.56|120.23.176.56
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:POINT)