Deletion of Arghoslent

Comment: Like I said, I'm a curious person! That's fair enough, as I do understand my prime arguments; "old, controversial and underground fame" are not supported by 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: My comment included results of a quick Google search and not a thorough research per  ''guideline'', but at least I'm not an |ostrich. As a Last.fm user, I usually check the artist's page on the aforementioned website, as the site is very widely used and is WP-notable, and also because I'm curious. Is there a specific reason why I shouldn't report the listener count here (and not have my entire comment belittled because of it)? Also, your band seems to have only 424 listeners, despite the fact that it's streamable through the site - unlike Arghoslent, seems to fail the Google test when searching with album titles, and I doubt you are well-known in your own genre, have a 16-year-long career and are a subject of controversy. So what is the reason for comparison? I must also quote myself from the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Belial's Key|Grand Belial's Key Afd discussion; ''it's not fair to assume that Allmusic.com and Amazon.com want to cover bands associated with nazism''. In fact, I don't think even bigger ''metal'' medias and labels want to associate with these bands. As for what they are or what they represent, they seem pretty notable to me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:OSTRICH)