Deletion of Consumers' Institute of New Zealand

Comment: per NealeFamily this organization is well-known within NZ. For example, http://www.nzherald.co.nz/22consumer20nz22/search/results.cfm?kw1=%22Consumer%20NZ%22&kw2=&st=gsa here is a list of articles mentioning them in the NZ Herald (the country's largest newspaper). Their reports are often the subject of the article, and they are also consulted & quoted in an 'advisory' or 'authority' capacity. This would appear to satisfy . I'll rename the page as well, since it doesn't reflect the current title of the organization
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I added some statements with citations, so now there are some sources. I feel that what I have added demonstrates that the subject of this article has received significant coverage in multiple publications which are independent of the subject, and for that reason, this article meets Wikipedia inclusion criteria and should be kept. However - I work for a sister organization of Consumer NZ - Consumer Reports in the United States. I know nothing about Consumer NZ and actually these kinds of organizations exist in many countries. I have a |conflict of interest by Wikipedia community guidelines so the usual practice is for me to declare this when I edit articles which could be promotional and for me to ask other editors to put extra scrutiny on what I do. I actually am employed to share consumer information on Wikipedia - see  for some descriptions of what I do. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:CONSUMER)