Deletion of Jan Zobel

Comment: per pburka, and I have added more sources to the article that also support  notability as a tax expert and author, e.g. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2011-aug-15-la-fi-smallbiz-tax-20110815-story.html Los Angeles Times (2011), https://www.midwestbookreview.com/ibw/apr_05.htm Midwest Book Review (2005), https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/17678 Entrepreneur (1999); she is also mentioned as an early board member of the San Francisco Women's Building in ''https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SGW2u4XQvAQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=%22Jan+Zobel%22&ots=Z2arNNeEvm&sig=CagW7Epx5xziTBqGokhgD_ZPFJk#v=onepage&q=%22Jan%20Zobel%22&f=false Mothering the Movement: The Story of the San Francisco Women's Building'' (2011
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: per arguments by Pburka, Beccaynr, and Penny Richards. I would also say that this fulfills the  guidelines and is definitely notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per . There are 20 refs now, including some mentioned above. Not all refs need to support the subject's notability, btw; some just support individual facts. Yearbooks are only used as a published source for facts like "she graduated from Whittier College", and obituaries are only used as a published source for the names/professions of her parents. (I started the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per location of more sources above per a potential upgrade . These folks in marginalized groups during the pre-google age can be a challenge to locate source material, but I think there’s now enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)