Deletion of Adam Watkins

Comment: Must admit I'm surprised that people think this article passes . Disregarding stuff from Luton Town F.C., which clearly isn't independent of the subject or those associated with him, http://www.lutontoday.co.uk/sport/watkins_is_living_his_luton_dream_1_1034816 source #4 quotes his manager saying if he keeps working hard he might get into the first team squad; http://www.bedfordshire-news.co.uk/Sport/Luton-Town-FC/Watkins-has-been-our-best-player-Brabin-27072011.htm #11 quotes his new manager thinking he did well in pre-season; http://www.luton-dunstable.co.uk/Sport/Luton-Town-FC/Watkins-thanks-boss-as-he-helps-rout-QPR-06082011.htm #3, a week later, quotes his manager thinking he did well in pre-season and Watkins being pleased the manager is giving him a chance; http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14619072.stm #13 is BBC Sport reporting his new contract with Luton; http://www.bedfordshire-news.co.uk/Sport/Luton-Town-FC/Watkins-reaping-rewards-of-Hatters-faith-with-England-call-up-24082011.htm #15 quotes his manager thinking he's done well in pre-season but saying people shouldn't get carried away, and reports Watkins' selection for the England C team; http://www.bedfordshire-news.co.uk/Sport/Luton-Town-FC/Watkins-and-Atieno-double-up-in-cup-cruise-for-Hatters.htm #8 is a report of a match in which he scored twice against a team from three divisions below Luton; and the other independent sources are name on team sheets, presence at a club function, etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly fails . Also fails , a lot of the football coverage is  and  - nothing significant that passes notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: As the editor who accepted the page through fC|Articles for Creation I think I'd better explain why. While it is true that the player doesn't meet |the football guidelines, it is very clear that with multiple independent news sources, it passes the |general notability guidelines easily, which is more important (as it is a requirement of articles that pass the football guidelines too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: the person http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Adam+Watkins%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 has been the subject of |multiple non-trivial |reliable third party sources and meets the |notability guidelines for biographies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and probably  per Struway2's comments. Due to the nature of football coverage including match reports, it's always easy to find a player's name mentioned frequently in the media, but that doesn't necessarily translate to "significant" coverage (unlike, say that that Sonny Pike received
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:GNG)