Deletion of The Women's College, University of Sydney

Comment: I invite you to read .The question is not (and has never been) "are residential university colleges notable?" the question is (and has always been) "has this particular entity received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject as per the  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:GNG||WP:ORG)

Comment: Per  and , places of tertiary education are generally assumed to be inherently notable. I assume that being the oldest Australian university, it models itself on the collegian system as seen in Oxford University|Oxford and Cambridge University|Cambridge, which would have been the most obvious examples of British universities to refer to in the 1850s (http://sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2011/51&RendNum=0 source here), and hence where colleges are inherently notable in their own right. (Try AfDing King's College, Cambridge|this as a "hostel" and see how far you get
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHS||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)