Deletion of Timmins Square

Comment: based on {{U|Paul Erik}}'s comment above.  I've gone back and forth on this, and gave Paul the benefit of the doubt when he said he found a reference in a national publication which establishes notability.  But, based on his answer above (for which I thank him), I must conclude that the weight of the references found do not meet  and .  Since I don't have direct access to the article, I have to go on Paul's description of the contents.  From that, I conclude that this article is not about this mall, but about a real estate deal which just happened to include this mall.  That's insufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: As per Paul and Bearcat.  Article meets both  and .  The mall has received coverage in both regional and national media.  There does not appear to be any basis for the "niche" media excuse to dismiss the regional coverage.  The Financial Post (the business section of the National Post) is one of the country's main business news media outlets - they typically do not cover the sale of minor plazas and malls.  While the Post article is on the real estate deal, it's the properties themselves which collectively made that deal worth covering in one of Canada's main business media outlets.   quite explicitly states that the coverage must be "more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material" - so the focus on the larger deal does not mean that  has not been met (and the coverage certainly isn't trivial since the mall was the subject of the deal).  I think  and  are being construed by some way too narrowly. As an aside, 6,000 sounds to me like a pretty healthy circulation for a newspaper these days in a town of approximately 45,000
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:GNG)