Deletion of Shaikh Syed Abdul Razzaq Jilani

Comment: The criteria for deletion does not fit at all. According to , ''"the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be worthy of notice"''. The subject of the article is undoubtedly worthy of notice. Being the son as well as the successor of Shaikh Abdul Qadir Jilani is not the only but surely the most significant aspect of his popularity because the contributions of the former saint were greater. If the sources did not discuss about the subject of the article, the article would never have been able to come into shape. The entire article has been extracted using the |sources mentioned within the article otherwise having to write an entire biography and that too of a saint who belongs to the 12th century can be very challenging. This is true for editors like myself who have to get involved in extensive research for article creation. This is why a range of sources had to be read and researched upon most of which as authentic and .  ''Multiple independent sources have been combined to demonstrate notability'' per  for the article to exist per Wikipedia policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSON||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:BASIC)