Deletion of The Cross (2010 film)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: If they start shooting, we can revisit through 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: Gross violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per . My thanks to Big Bird for the excellent research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: by virtue of  which states: "Films that have not been confirmed by |reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should '''not''' have their own articles". As of yet, there are no reliable sources confirming commencement of principal photography so the film clearly fails NFF. However, if and when principal photography does begin, the article is likely to get recreated and, at that time, it should be kept because it will have met NFF as well as  due to already existing wide-spread RS coverage such as: http://www.theherald.com.au/news/local/news/general/orlando-bloom-movie-the-cross-could-be-filmed-in-hunter/1575515.aspx, http://www.movieweb.com/news/NExUUFBERI41BC, http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=festivals&jump=story&id=2476&articleid=VR1117999566&cs=1, http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=52567, http://www.screeninglog.com/journal/2009/2/6/orlando-bloom-joins-niccols-the-cross.html, http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/02/05/orlando-bloom-heads-to-the-future-for-sci-fi-the-cross/, http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/entertainment/orlando-bloom-roped-in-for-the-cross_100151480.html, http://www.collider.com/entertainment/news/article.asp/aid/10793/tcid/1, http://news-briefs.ew.com/2009/02/05/orlando-bloom-s/ and many more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: coverage in multiple reliable sources meets |the general notability guideline, which FF should not supercede
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NFF)