Deletion of Howard Schneider (Florida dentist)

Comment: There https://www.google.com/search?q=Howard+S.+Schneider,+Florida&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=HvxeVc-iFpezoQTYj4PIDQ&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAw&biw=1024&bih=655 '''are''' a great deal of sources available speaking toward this individual's many-years-long series of alleged multiple and repeated crimes, but under  we need tread lightly.  The historic significance of the crimes is indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote significant attention to the individual's role, and we have those in spade.  is less applicable as we have coverage of the years long and repeated accusations of the different offenses of 1) alleged "Medicaid fraud" and 2) alleged "child abuse". BUT a person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person. Is there such an article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Violates  and . Everything is "alleged" or "accused". None of the allegations against him have been proven, they are just allegations - apparently most of them filed by plaintiffs in civil suits; if ever there was an unreliable source, it is the claims made in a civil suit! Others are complaints of child abuse - complaints which anyone can make, justified or not, and the authorities must investigate. If he ever gets actually convicted of anything, we can rewrite the article. In the meantime, it is a mess of unverified claims and innuendo, and should have no place at Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:PERP)

Comment: If  or  isn't enough, then I'm happy to go with .  We're an encyclopedia.  We're not a tabloid, and we're not a police blotter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP||WP:IAR)