Deletion of Tyler Glaiel

Comment: I've added additional sources. He was included in Forbes 30 under 30 (games section) in 2016. The assessment by IceWelder above that "none of the sources contain any in-depth coverage of Glaiel" is plainly wrong and can't be based on actually looking at them. The multiple interviews, esp. the Oxford University Press one, are obviously in-depth coverage of him. Also it's my understanding that notability IS inherited from his games, based on points 3 and 4 in . His game Closure esp. obviously satisfies both those points
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I have not yet formed a view. But I just want to point out that  has a specific disclaimer highlighting that it is not a Wikipedia policy or guideline, so unless someone can cite a specific ''guideline-only'' provision which specifically proscribes interviews when assessing secondary sources for notability, citing  is not at all helpful or even relevant. If we are going to refer to essays in an instructive manner to deal with the nature of interviews, Wikipedia:Interviews goes into detail and provides much more useful, nuanced advice for interviews since they are material that falls somewhere in between. I'm also a bit confused with the nomination; is the nominator alleging that the creator of the article has a |conflict of interest with the subject of the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:COI)