Deletion of Kraftwurx

Comment: the current article is clearly promotional - the only link provided is to the company's "sell" page. How much more blatantly promotional can you get? Leaving that aside, the lack of |independent, published sources means there is no way for readers to |verify the article and it clearly does not meet either of the applicable criteria for notability:  and . Indeed, the article does not even assert notability. I originally nominated this article for speedy  deletion under |CSD:A7 and G11. Both of these still apply. Full disclosure: like the nominator, I too live in a country
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:CSD)

Comment: I did a pretty thorough search and couldn't really find anything that would count as a reliable source. What I did find would be considered promotional pieces put out by the company. There's only one sole article that might be considered reliable http://www.solidsmack.com/cad-design-news/digital-reality-kraftwurx-3d-printing/, but as Sparthorse said, we need more than just one source. It doesn't seem to pass  at this time, although I think that '''Bcn0209''' should look into whether or not he could potentially userfy the article until the time comes if/when the company has enough reliable sources to pass notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)