Deletion of Child-on-child sexual abuse

Comment: to child sexual abuse -- It would seem that child-on-child sexual abuse would fit as well under ''child sexual abuse'' as ''adult-child sexual abuse''.  Limiting the CSA article to adult-child only doesn't match the scope stated by the article title.  However, this article seems to cover a  |notable topic and cites |reliable sources for |verification.  My first instinct would be to keep, since we're not in danger of running out of electrons, but I could see merging, as long as the content were to be preserved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: I hope this is rare, but the fact that four articles are cited means that this article cannot be dismissed as .  The article speaks of pre-pubescent abuse, whereas the main Child sex abuse article speaks ofadult on child abuse.  Where does abuse by a pubescent youth on a (pre-pubescent) child get dealt with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)