Deletion of The Living Word Fellowship (4th nomination)

Comment: Nothing has changed n the last few weeks.  As I commented in the last AfD - lots of agendas here, but the article has  for notability and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: for essentially the same reasons I gave in the previous AfDs. Nothing has changed since those earlier AfDs. The nominator seems to have the mistaken perception that |notability is based solely on the here and now. |Notability is not temporary, and historical topics are within the scope of the encyclopedia. I don't want to argue about the LWF's current membership numbers and geographic scope, although both seem to be larger than the nominator contends. Regardless of what its membership numbers and geographic coverage are now, this organization is notable for the attention that it has received in the past, including (1) coverage in published books about new religious movements and (2) being a major subject of a documentary film by Yoko Ono's estranged first husband
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:notability)