Deletion of Dan Bryk

Comment: If he passes , he deserves an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: as while the article is indeed rather messy and we should tag it for cleanup, it easily fulfills the  notability criteria.  To illustrate, reviews of his work have been featured in several recent non-trivial published works, such as Pitchfork Media.  Check out http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/page/track_reviews/Dan_Bryk_Love_Me_for_Christmas#40173 Pitchfork Review #1 and http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/track_review/39115 Pitchfork Review #2 for examples
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: as  does seem met. Article is a mess, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Are you kidding me? This article practically embodies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Multinational tours + multiple commercial albums http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/103-7598955-0455062?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Dan+Bryk&Go.x=17&Go.y=14&Go=Go= meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: meets ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: meets  but needs a complete rewrite. I never heard of him but through a Google search he is obviously notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)