Deletion of Performance record of clubs in the Premier League

Comment: This nomination appears to be made in bad-faith as a  nomination in retaliation for the (somewhat questionable) result - the threat to disrupt Wikipedia is made by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)

Comment: since it fails . Plus, a good case could be made for it also failing  and . Normally I'd be down for a merge, but it's generally weak sauce IMO to merge stuff that fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOSTATS||WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:GNG)

Comment: The deletion request seems to be based purely on , with several Wikipedia policies linked often without a coherent narrative as to why it should be deleted. This leaves the onus on those wishing to keep the article without having a clear objection to discuss. This article, and similar articles should remain. Wikipedia policy cited included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: reply|PeeJay}} Firstly all the information is already found in each season article for the Premier League, then again all the same information is in Premier League records and statistics. What is this article, a third or forth in displaying all the same information in a different way? Yes you can source numbers and statistics but that is not enough. You must provide sources where this same style is matched somewhere else. Unless that is done, this technically is in breach of . '''To everyone else''' simply throwing an article together and saying it passes GNG because it's a widely covered subject, you still need to add citations to show that the subject in its form has been represented in independent sources. I do not see that here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)