Deletion of Next Nature

Comment: per . |Worthy causes need RS too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:NOBLE)

Comment: The current sources which are germane to the subject are also affiliated with it. I found a couple more potential sources with Google Books: a http://books.google.com/books?id=Xi-ePQopZAgC&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=%22Next+Nature%22&source=bl&ots=d6EbCgbJXw&sig=z7sI42Je-we2BUlPJvSmbzb0bug&hl=en&sa=X&ei=0S12ULP0MvOv0AGnyYD4Ag&sqi=2&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Next%20Nature%22&f=false paragraph in a book by John Zerzan, and http://books.google.com/books?id=2HzPTc-ZIEsC&pg=PA368&lpg=PA368&dq=%22Next+Nature%22&source=bl&ots=6KE3xQkdK5&sig=w__uTz9gSAQyiFjVBx6wNS9er0k&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yzJ2ULrHNc3E0AGXwYCwDQ&ved=0CFQQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q=%22Next%20Nature%22&f=false one sentence in book about sustainable energy. Neither qualify as "significant coverage" IMO. As Morris said, it's  but not notable. Perhaps in the future it will be, but not yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INTERESTING)