Deletion of Terry Van Horne

Comment: per  members of state assemblies such as the Pennsylvania House of Representatives are deemed to be notable. If there are issues such as  and  then those should be fixed within the article. For what it's worth I don't see these. Van Horne's rebuttal is included in the article and it does look on the surface that the controversy may have cost him a subsequent election so it's notable in the context of his political career. That however is something to discuss on the article's talk page. Deletion review isn't the place for fixing articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Subject clearly meets . POV problems are a reason for clean up, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Cleanup was not particularly difficult. Severe NPOV issues on articles about notable subjects should only be a cause for deletion when they cross the  threshold. This was not the case here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATP)