Deletion of Blasphemy and the United Nations

Comment: I appreciate the concerns of AzureFury and others that this article is likely to suffer from ,  and  issues but I would only advocate deleting an article on those grounds if it was ''inherently'' so and that the problems couldn't be fixed by regular editing and vigilance. I think there is a decent article to be salvaged from this thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:POV||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per AzureFury's comments above.  This is absolutely .  The intent of the original author is clear in his choice of the original title for the article.  No sources exist to establish the notability of "Blasphemy" or "Defamation of religions and the United Nations".  Fails , , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:OR||WP:NPOV)