Deletion of Starbucks collectibles

Comment: Hugsyrup summarized very well above. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for notability, fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: as |trivial and |independent sources. But I'll change my !vote if my Starbucks card suddenly has 4,500 points miraculously added to it. /snark
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:RS)

Comment: if I could find the slightest indication that this term was notable, I'd have argued for a merge, but I cannot. A google search turns up precisely nothing, and all of the sources in the article seem to be aimed at proving that people do in fact collect Starbucks merch and that a secondary market exists (hardly surprising - people will collect anything) but do nothing to show that the term, concept, or existence of that secondary market is notable. So, agree with nom that this fails , insufficient sourced content for a merge. A case could be made for a redirect, but the obvious redirect target of Starbucks#Starbucks_collectibles was itself only added today, and seemingly only in a rather misguided effort to de-orphan ''this'' article. Since that section is itself extremely poorly sourced (an unreliable website, and an article that is actually about the Starbucks card and not the concept of collectibles as a whole) it should be removed. Hence, I see no value in a redirect either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: material which does not really belong in an encyclopedia and is . No 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:RS)