Deletion of Melissa Schroeder

Comment: I couldn't find any sources, and I can't see any other reason she would pass . There are a lot of Google hits for her name, though, so there's always the chance that I may have missed something. If anyone finds suitable references I could be persuaded to change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The listing of the publishers indicate that Schroeder has been published, and as a verification of that fact, the source is reliable.  However, such a listing does not indicate that the author is |notable, for which there are specific guidelines, among which one does not find prolificacy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: By "published work" do you mean the quantity of the author's output, or the quantity of sources relating to the author?  If the former -- mere prolificacy cannot be the measure of |notability.  If the latter -- the only ''hint'' of a source that indicates notability is the reference to the 2005 list of best selling e-books.  But since e-books were such a small part of the publishing industry in 2005, having a best-selling e-book didn't really mean that one was a best-selling author.  Other hints include finalist listings in some relatively minor awards.  Nothing that meets the criteria of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS|The existence of other poor articles on Wikipedia is not a valid argument for keeping this bad article.  I have nominated this article based on my interpretation of the Wikipedia guidelines and the existing sources.  If others disagree with my interpretation of the guidelines or the facts in evidence, then they can disagree with me, and the |consensus may be reached that the article should be kept.  I have no personal opinion about Schroeder at all: I have never heard of her nor have I ever read any of her works.  I've never read any of Charles Dickens' works either, and would very likely despise any that I did read (that's just not my favored style of literature), but I can recognize his notability without having read him
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS)