Deletion of Zelda Comic

Comment: per  and http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=zeldacomic.net Alexa rank of 868,565
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Sorry you disagree with our deletion policy, w00ty, but it's quite fair.  Perhaps if you were a member, you would understand it better.  This article is non-notable and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The policies of Wikipedia decide what is notable and not-notable.  This is an encyclopedia, so every article must have some reason for its existence.  The article Zelda Comic is not notable according to Wikipedia policies ( and ).  Everyone can edit this encyclopedia because that way, the greatest amount of information is available.  However, certain policies here allow vandalism and non-notable articles to be removed.  Notable porn sites must be kept, even though many people (myself among them) do not like them on moral grounds.  Terrorist groups must be included in an encyclopedia because they are notable.  Yes, children can access this website, but they must look up the pornographic page or terrorist group to access the corresponding article.  Children can go to ''google.com'' and search for pornography and terrorist groups.  An encyclopedia is a collection of important, notable information. (See: encyclopedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT)

Comment: Totally Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per nom. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The counterpoint to that frontpage comment is that the sheer size and mass of the internet make it impossible to catalog all information -- a common misconception is that Wikipedia indiscriminately collects information, and we don't. It's not that I hate you guys or anything, I'm sure you enjoy yourselves and I wish you nothing but the best. I only ask that you understand that we're literally ''flooded'' with hundreds or thousands of new articles every day, and if something even looks remotely like "This is a band my friends and I started," we're going to take a closer look. Have a glance at the criteria of , if you will. Notability can be subjective, but it's an important concept; factual accuracy alone doesn't guarantee inclusion. Hope that helps a bit. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: As I always say, any site that cites their Wikipedia page on their front page fails . Oh yeah, per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Except... is not a vote, it is a means of establishing consensus among editors for reasons leading to deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: interestingly, last time you checked |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a |soapbox or a vehicle for fancruft or a vehicle for advertising
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)