Deletion of List of convicted child sex offenders

Comment: There are so many reasons this is wrong for WP... it's a magnet for , vandalism, and possibly legal threats to the foundation. Also, the list is completely unsourced. Also, Wikipedia is not a sex offender list, especially given the sheer number of sex offenders. Think of WP having a list of people convicted for GTA. Not going to happen. On the other hand, you shouldn't delete lists because a corresponding category exists. Lists (in general, not necessarily this particular list) are able to communicate much more information about a topic than a category ever will
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: libellous - is this even legal? Point taken, argument for deletions stands, however.  It's unencyclopedic and can only attract the addition of articles which violate  and . Also per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BLP)