Deletion of Witness accounts of the Roswell UFO incident (3rd nomination)

Comment: Article appears to be a massive |PROFRINGE |PROMO piece. As noted by the nom it is also a |CONTENTFORK. It violates |DUE which as policy trumps any claim to notability, that being doubtful in any case. Far too many of the sources are fringe, which are emphatically not |RS. On a side note I am a bit confused by the history of the article. It survived the first AfD but the second directed that it be transwickied to Wikiquotes. Did this ever happen? In any event it is not an encyclopedic article and it needs to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:PROFRINGE||WP:PROMO||WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:DUE||WP:RS)

Comment: I see no evidence that the proper due diligence was executed before the  was created. Useful content (if any) should be merged back into the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)