Deletion of Rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated

Comment: No point in time is ever good to have a deletion discussion. There's no point closing this early, there's certainly no  situation, and no consensus. If the situation is the same after the allotted 5 days, there will be a decision by an admin on consensus, most likely "no consensus" looking at things in their current state.  Looking at the stuff you provided above, however, it appears that the coverage is incidental - unless someone has that copy of Newsweek around (and even 1 article may not establish notability). Mentions in an article about Srac... aren't enough, and If we merged the article to "b5 and the internet", then it would just redirect there, where the article text could be read alongside other incidents of similar things. Also, with the debate bein open for another couple of days at least, it gives you plenty of time to cite the article, using these guidelines ,  and . If you want to message me on my talk page, I'd be happy to help you add citations to the article, and advise you on what sources are considered reliable etc, as I'm pretty familiar with full citations etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:REF||WP:CITE||WP:RS)

Comment: Added two references in books published by university presses, a couple of web site citations.  Added a few more web citations, which can be added to the article if needed, into the Talk page.  Take a look--none of them are fansites. The ''topic'' has always passed  and --now the article does, too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: since the creator of the show was a contributor, and it seems to be the most popular of the "uses of the internet", but lacks individual notability due to a lack of |verifiable information given the absence of |reliable sources
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)