Deletion of Abdullah Al-Salloum

Comment: Since nominations usually and essentially still question the notability of the subject, although the "in English" part is flawed, kindly consider the following: 1) For : Sources #1, #4 through #9 '''satisfy''' being "independent sources that have coverage on the subject in addition to his work." 2) For : Sources #1, #4 through #9 '''may or may not satisfy''' "2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." 3) For : Sources #5, #6 and #9 '''satisfy''' "2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique." 4) For : Sources #1, through #4, #7 and #8 '''satisfy''' "The person's work (or works) (c) has won significant critical attention". NOTE: '''none of the listed sources is passing mentions''' and sources #2 and #3 are related to the publications, by authorized publishers, of the subject. Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:ECONOMIST||WP:AUTHOR)