Deletion of Stealth Blimp

Comment: obvious  and specifically  problems with this article. Until reliable sources can be found for anything related to the topic, it needs to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN)

Comment: Quoting Hyper formance: ''Additionally I feel the sightings show a statistically relevant pattern that points to the existence of this platform.'' That is pure and simple |original research. Wikipedia is not a place to draw statistical conclusions, it is a place to list |verifiable information. As Tom points out, there is barely a sentence on the supposed blimp in this article. The rest are perfectly summed up by Eyeserene. This doesn't meet any of our core content policies and I don't think it can in the foreseeable future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: I understand your frustration, but |Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance. Our policies and guidelines prohibit articles that lack |reliable, third-party, published sources.  There are sites and blogs for investigative journalism, but this is not one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS)