Deletion of Sensory overload

Comment: it certainly needs TLC and some serious editing, but this is clearly a notable topic, and probably is not a candidate for . The fact that it's difficult to define is not a reason to delete; |I can recall several times we have kept articles precisely because they were difficult to define - in a few cases they have ended up as ''dab'' pages.  For examples, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaos, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisu, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velleity, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: per : "''fails to advance an argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)