Deletion of Money as Debt (4th nomination)

Comment: per . More |sources speak toward this film other than the one the nom has chosen to dismiss. '''''IF''''' the the "only" ndependent|independent |reliable source speaking toward this film were the Peer review|peer-reviewed academic journal ''Anthropology Today'', we'd have concerns toward the film meeting  and, as it is not a widely distributed theatrical release, most media have ignored it... usually because its topic is seen as not toeing their political line. Yet it has been well received, and even where it has been critiqued by "outside" journals (such as ''Anthropology Today|AT'') they've still taken notice of it. Our |notability guideline isn't based on it being ''praised'' or being ''true''... but is in fact based on a film being discussed, whether positively or negatively.  Perception by any that the film's content ''might'' be absolute nonsense is not a criteria that we use, and no more pertinent to a film article being kept or deleted than is the make-believe science of ''Star Wars'' or the magic of ''Harry Potter''.   In application of |applicable criteria and even in recognition that documentary films rarely receive the coverage of mainstream blockbusters, this one does meet  through . Per  and , article and project will benefit from it remaining and being addressed over time and through regular editing using the many https://www.google.com/search?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&tbm=nws&gl=us&as_epq=Money%20as%20Debt&as_occt=any&as_drrb=a&tbs=ar%3A1&authuser=0 available sources even if some are in French (see ).  That it has |not been improved since its last keep, is a reason to do so through understanding of MPERFECT and ... but not to  delete through disagreeing with one of the Money as Debt#references|article's many sources. We may also consider . We do not expect ANY topic to remain forever in the headlines. Wikipedia does not benefit from 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTAGAIN||WP:NRVE||WP:I||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:NF||WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NRVE||WP:ATD||WP:NONENG||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:WIP||WP:NTEMP||WP:KEEPLISTINGTILLITGETSDELETED)

Comment: It is the work of a moment to find more detailed sources such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GeXBzJBJe1wC&pg=PA284 this book''.  The topic therefore passes our |notability guideline easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)