Deletion of Ironclaw (2nd nomination)

Comment: Based only on the sources in the article, I'm convinced that ''maybe'' one of them passes  (the interview as described above.) Everything else appears to be either unreliable, not independent, or not . I also have no problem in the future with undeletion/draftifying if others think sources can be found, but can't support a keep in its current state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The game was analyzed in the New York University Doctoral Thesis "Narrative and identity in fantasy role -playing games" by Ken Lacy; Advisor Gregory R. Guy, 2006. Not sure what wikipedia's thoughts are on doctoral theses in regards to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: A quick look at the sources does show an improvement over the version of the article which was deleted a few months ago, although I would be happier if fewer of them from youtube – hopefully there are better |reliable sources out there than what we have so far
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Passes  and .  confirmed that a doctoral thesis is a reliable source because it goes through rigorous academic peer review. The disertation given by Ken Lacy is significant coverage of Ironclaw. This in conjunction with the sources provided by GreenReaper are enough to satisfy wikipedia's notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RSN)

Comment: I'm confident we can establish notability per  and  to a level commensurate with related topics. We'll dig for more
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)