Deletion of Worley noise

Comment: The nomination seems to misunderstand our  policy, which has nothing to do with the potential for expansion.  "''One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written. Another perennial source of confusion is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead editors to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: per TPH as , poorly ref'd, only 4 GBook hits, GHits show it mainly as an alternate name for "Cell noise,"  It fits DicDef perfectly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: and  to the nom. Bad-faith nomination, with several reliable sources existing. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.74.22|202.124.74.22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)