Deletion of Discrimination of ethnic minorities in Estonia

Comment: a quick glance reveals this is a content fork meant to shine a bad light on Estonia; material like this can easily be covered in neutral fashion at Human rights in Estonia. The two "point of view" sections are non-standard and forum-like. Citing Johan Bäckman doesn't boost the article's credibility; the man's a nutcase. Per , , , ,  and , delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTAFORUM||WP:COATRACK||WP:FRINGE||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:V)

Comment: in current form, per  and . Handpicking one-sided sources, including |fringe positions, excluding relevant (and sourced) comments from the original section. Even the name of the article is a clear violation of NPOV, the underlying principle of all Wikipedia - not "Allegations of discrimination...", but "Discrimination of...". The article as it is now needs to go, however, there could be an article about allegations - perhaps Allegations of discrimination of Russophones in Estonia (as strangely enough, the article does not mention the discrimination of Setos, Jews, Tatars, Finns, Latvians or other non-russophonic Demographics of Estonia|national groups in Estonia). Also
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:POVFORK||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: as a clear violation of Wikipedia's |most fundamental principle. As mentioned above, the article undoubtedly falls under  and , and considering that even the name of the article is a transgression of  Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Article_naming|NPOV: Article naming, I don't see how the earlier calls for improvement can possibly apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NEU||WP:COATRACK||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Firstly, look at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russian_influence_operations_in_Estonia, and notice the way that advocaters are voting. Voting keep for something that is on the fringes, but voting delete for something for which ufortunately there is a long and documented history of systematic discrimination against ethnic minorities in Estonia, particularly against the Russian community. Yes, we have an article on Russians in Estonia, but the history of Russians in Estonia goes back hundreds of years, in no small part due to Estonia being a part of the Russian Empire. Russophobia also covers anti-Russian feelings amongst a variety of groups (yet it is still missing a lot of information). This is not a , but a |content fork on a http://books.google.com/books?q=discrimination%20of%20russians%20in%20estonia&le=en&sourceid=Mozilla-search&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp notable http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=discrimination%20of%20russians%20in%20estonia&le=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&sa=N&tab=ps topic. AfD is not an avenue to solve content disputes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:CFORK)

Comment: per  and OR (http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=multizilla&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&hl=en&q=%22Discrimination%2Bof%2Bethnic%2Bminorities%2Bin%2BEstonia%22), but also '''merge''' salvageable content if any to ethnic minorities in Estonia. PS. I also like Illythr's suggestion to create human rights in Estonia; it has a neutral title and part if the series on human rights in Europe
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: I have to reiterate that per #REASON, content forking is a valid reason for deletion regardless of notability and verifiability. Some users here seem to miss this, and the discussion in general became largely irrelevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: pr.  & . or else what's next? Discrimination of ethnic minorities in Russia? Or how about renaming Estonian_Russians#Third_influx to Illegal Soviet immigrants in Estonia? etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND||WP:NOTSOAPBOX)