Deletion of Cultural Agency Theory

Comment: This article looks like a review of primary sources discussing cultural agency theory (CAT) and earlier theories it is based on. As such, it is a synthesis of primary sources that does not belong on Wikipedia, per --we don't write articles drawing our own conclusions about primary sources, we summarize secondary sources, such as published reviews or books on CAT. I've been unable to find independent secondary sources on cultural agency theory, so in addition to synth problems, this topic also seems to fail notability thresholds per . Lastly, even as an academic work, this "review" has major neutrality problems. Everything I have found suggests that CAT was created by Yolles and colleagues. Yolles credits Schwarz and Beer with earlier work upon which CAT is based, but despite this article being about 80% centered on Schwarz, there is no evidence that Schwarz created CAT or ever called it that. This is a tribute piece to Schwarz pretending to be an encyclopedia article on CAT. Without independent reliable sources discussing cultural agency theory in depth, we cannot write a neutral , verifiable  article on the topic. Hence deletion seems warranted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Even the firstmost source cited doesn't seem to contain the term? Seems like mostly heavy  as mentioned by nominator. This is all I were able to find to use the term in our article's context: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2463270. There is the general concept of Principal–agent_problem#Economic_theory|agency theory, and the word "cultural" is sometimes latched on to that term. But these other uses that I were able to find were different from our article's
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)