Deletion of Mariju Bofill

Comment: Those discussions I've read about AfD being a "snakepit" and a haven for incivility are dead-on true.  I thought Mariju might qualify for a bio because she barely meets  as I read it.  I guess she'd have to be elected to truly qualify.  Is anyone interested in why I wrote the article in the first place?  Editcountitis, in part, although I did want to see how long it would last, to sort of see where  ended and began.  I thought I needed to create articles, and I don't write about fiction.  I prefer writing about real people.  What I didn't do is stalk.  A stalker would have provided personal, invasive information.  A stalker would have tried to bait his subject or paint the subject in a bad light or put in slightly wrong information to invite the subject's participation.  I didn't do any of that, and I surely didn't even let on how I knew her, or my identity, which is none of anyone's business.  Michael Snow hasn't responded to my refutations of his stalking allegations, so I deem them baseless and inflammatory.  I think he needs watched for personal attacks.  I probably, honestly wouldn't have had a thing to say on this AfD if I weren't attacked.  I'm going to echo Zell Miller's remarks to Chris Matthews with respect to Michael Snow.  "I wish we still lived in a time when a man could challenge another man to a duel
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: as per .  Mid-level civil servant with no significant claim of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO)

Comment: The nominator as removed material, as he said in his edit summary, 'he was unable to verify'. Please |assume good faith. Actually, it is possible to verify most of it http://www.napaba.org/napaba/showpage.asp?code=scholarshiprecipients, but whilst that may make the moninator mistakles, it does not constitute vandalism. Calm down and present your case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: per . (And the photo is creepy, too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: according to main author's wishes and . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)