Deletion of 2017 Antwerp attack

Comment: Per , no one was injured or killed, not notable in my eyes though it should stay on the List of terrorist incidents in March 2017 assuming reputable sources state it was such, not just drug-induced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per the prosecutors, "there was not enough serious evidence of terror legislation breaches" so the terrorism charges were dropped, and this should be carefully reflected in the article to maintain . Regardless, the nom questioned the notability, and the latest controversy and the fuss in the news (every single day now) make the attack (terror-related or not) clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Fails the . The Nice, Berlin, London and Stockholm attacks will still be notable in a decade, this attempted attack won't be. This article about a relatively minor incident only seems to have been created due to . Also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: can be redirected later if needed) to List of terrorist incidents in March 2017. Clearly newsworthy (). Timing with London and possibly style with Berlin, passes GNG, arguably notable as similar as part of pattern which is no less notable for deathtoll. Too early to say if will turn from a news item to long-term, but there's sources including ones days after the event https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/03/pray-london-antwerp-nice-europes-new-normal/ http://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/7833/antwerp-vehicle-suspect-no-planned-rise-in-terror-threat-level-in-belgium http://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/7832/antwerp-vehicle-suspect-not-flagged-up-as-radicalised https://www.ft.com/content/92e45c9b-f2b2-322f-96e6-568d82dc9e4c http://normangeestar.net/2017/03/26/vehicular-attack-targets-shopping-street-in-n-belgium
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)