Deletion of Al Qaida facilitator

Comment: this appears to be a ''classic'' example of what  calls "neologisms that are in wide use—but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources", and which "are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia." &lt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Not written from a |neutral point-of-view. Wikipedia is |not a soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SOAP)

Comment: It would be easier to think about things like  if the article could start by defining what an "Al Qaida facilitator" is (or what the DoD means by the term, anyway). That's pretty basic  stuff, and also is pretty much the difference between whether this is |indiscriminate info or something which could turn into some kind of informative article. The term does seem to be used enough in US military and white house circles that I could imagine an article, but what we have here is pretty far from what we'd want. (also note the existence of :Category:Alleged al-Qaeda facilitators for whatever it is worth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:LEAD||WP:IINFO)

Comment: The article fails . Also, Al Qaeda is spelt wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: IAW  (namely the "nutshell" at the beginning of ; mentioned above already); I can also see some information here being moved to List of Al Qaida facilitators and this page being expanded to include what a facilitator actually is (a simple stub article used for clarification). I agree this article needs work, but it doesn't meet the criteria for outright deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:DEL)