Deletion of Daniel Sheen

Comment: upon looking closely at this one, I concur with the nominator.  The sole significant coverage about Sheen seems to be http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-diary/lin-lawyers-cv-fantasy-20090825-ey45.html an article in the Sydney Morning Herald.  While this material would certainly have a place in the article if Sheen were a more notable individual, I can't really find anything else much on him.  The other sources provided in the article do not address Sheen in depth.  For this reason, I feel he does not meet the  criteria at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)