Deletion of Consumer Watchdog (Botswana)

Comment: per . I have trouble finding reliable secondary sources (though this may well be due to a language barrier). The article is also filled with weasel words, which suggests a |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COI)

Comment: As per  standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: per . It seems obvious that an article about a California based organization would quite naturally have a greater number of English sources available... and that an article about a similar Botswana company might just be a little tougher to pin down. It is reasonable to expect that sources, either harcopy or Non-English, http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Consumer+Watchdog+%22%2C+Botswana&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7DVXA quite likely exist. The article deserves to be tagged for expansion and further sourcing so as to improve wiki. leanup is the solution. Deletion should be taken off the table.  And kudos to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB||WP:C)