Deletion of Rob Levin (fourth nomination)

Comment: to Peer-Directed Projects Center.  I can see a convincing argument that Rob Levin is not independently notable, but "non-notable" doesn't mean "delete".  "Non-notable" means "shouldn't have his own article".  And if we've decided he shouldn't have his own article, then it's very stupid to turn Rob Levin into a redlink that encourages an inexperienced editor to write one; and besides, "Rob Levin" is a plausible search term.  We can be more helpful to our end users than just giving them a redlink.  A redirect would take them to some of the information they seek, and there's no reason why Peer-Directed Projects Center shouldn't contain a sentence or two about Mr Levin.  In terms of our formal procedures, we're supposed to exhaust the |alternatives to deletion before we delete this material, and a redirect ''is'' a perfectly reasonable alternative
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: As per nom, fails to meet basic requirements of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As best as I can tell, he is a very successful person who is "notable" in the general sense of the word but does not meet the technical requirements for |notability here. He doesn't appear to have had articles written about him specifically, so I think the relevant information about him should be merged into the works that he has created. There are only a few paragraphs here, so that should be pretty easy. I'm more than willing to strike my !vote, however, if someone with better research skills than me can find some detailed articles about Mr. Levin himself
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)