Deletion of Katherine J. Thompson

Comment: as article creator per #C3 (fellow of a major academic society for which this is a significant honor, the American Statistical Association), as I already suggested to the nominator in removing their previous prod. The nominator appears to have failed to have even considered this suggestion seriously, and as a result the nomination is seriously flawed by using the wrong notability criterion (should be , not ). Note that the primary nature of the sources is not relevant for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per  using primary sources is not an issue here. Also, please do 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Although GS cites are low rof#C3 is satisfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: as passes  and seems nom has withdrawn
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Low citation count and no GNG coverage, but the subject still appears to satisfy #3 as a fellow of the ASA
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)