Deletion of Grover Furr

Comment: An output of 12 books (even if some may be Russian and English version of the same) surely satisfies .  It is notable that one of the books is published by Penguin, a general publisher, suggesting they think the work notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Handily meets  with the following discussion of him in third-party sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: mdash; It should be noted that the vast majority of the keep votes above are invalid arguments. 1. Even if an AfD nomination was done with political intent&mdash;and suggesting it is usually a violation our |assumption of good faith and |personal attack policies unless it's clear and obvious&mdash;if the article fails on its merits of meeting our other content |guidelines and |policies, the article gets axed. 2. Whether or not the arguments made by the subject within their body of work have merit is irrelevant to this discussion. The guideline-and-policy-based concern raised by the nominator is that the subject fails to meet |the guidelines for the notability of academics () and that the existing coverage that would have gone toward meeting  is instead also a violation of our |one-event notability of a living person (and/or presumably |one-event notability of any biography). Arguments going forth should address ''those'' concerns (or add policy-and-guideline-based concerns/rebuttals to them), otherwise they will be summarily ignored by the closing admin
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NPA||WP:LGL||WP:LOP||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO1E)