Deletion of Ram Kishore Shukla

Comment: Subject is notable under  - we should therefore have an article on him, even if it's only a stub. The main motivation behind most of the above delete !votes seems to be deletion of the ''talkpage'' - that isn't, nor has it ever been, a reason to delete an article. Given the severe |COI and |COMPETENCE issues, I am giving serious consideration to proposing |article bans for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:COI||WP:COMPETENCE||WP:ABAN)

Comment: obviously, per . There's clearly an agenda among those who are calling for deletion, and the best way to get any of their concerns taken into account would be for them to tell us exactly what their problem is. If there's anything in the talk page or its history that violates |our policy on avoiding harm to living people then that can be addressed without deleting the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BLP)

Comment: As per JamesWatson the subject was a member of the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from the Beohari (Vidhan Sabha constituency)http://eci.nic.in/archive/Nov2003/pollupd/ac/states/S12/Partycomp79.htm , a Former Speaker ,Minister in the Madhya Pradesh Government . Former members of a national, state or provincial legislature  are clearly notable as per olitician
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)