Deletion of Pyrcx

Comment: pyrcx is more than just another ircx server" is one point of view, whereas Wikipedia's point of view must be |neutral. In any case, are there any reliable sources that justify pyrcx's notability, besides its own website? See Wikipedia's guideline on |reliable sources and the official policy on |Notability and |Verifiability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:V)

Comment: not a notable IRC client http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Pyrcx%22&btnG=Search, no assertion of notability, possible  and per nom already mentioned in IRCX
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: no assertion of notability is made in the article. There are also |conflict of interest issues as well. According to the talk page, the developer created the article. Also, the article appears to be nothing more than spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)