Deletion of Mark William Shaw

Comment: I have a concern in that the article was essentially https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_William_Shaw&type=revision&diff=933748458&oldid=933737027 blanked and then less than an hour later was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_William_Shaw&diff=next&oldid=933748458 nominated for AFD. The Template:Article for deletion/dated|AFD header states "the article '''must not''' be |blanked." I believed the AFD process would look better if the article content was restored plus hatted with the AFD header and went ahead with that. I e-mailed the subject about the AFD and explained what he needs to show to establish notability (citing , , , and ). While he  does not seem to be technically versed in Wikipedia I suspect he understands the general process of citations as he has a law degree and has written biographies of other people which I used to show how he is part of making those people notable. Hopefully he either knows of citations we can use or is agreeable to that he's not a notable subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BASIC||WP:N||WP:page blanking)

Comment: largely per nom. The subject is an author and conspiracy theorist who seems to have gained little notice or critical reviews from reputable sources. As far as I am able to tell none of their works are independently notable. The page has been unsourced pretty much since its creation, and prior to my stubbing it appears to have been a promotional vehicle for the subject, who also edited the article at various times. Article fails ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:V||WP:NOPROMO)