Deletion of All-Time 100 Greatest TV Shows

Comment: As noted above, the lists were compiled by Time magazine, with is undisputed as a major news source. However the articles nominated should have the following done: 1. They should be retitled by adding (Time Magazine) to the titles; otherwise the titles would give the impression of |OR. 2. The articles should have their introductions expanded to give more context relating to the lists in question. Otherwise, I don't see a problem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: other lists similar to this have been deleted previously for copyright violations. There is no indication within the list on what makes these films notable. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTREPOSITORY)

Comment: as 23skidoois says, putting "Time" in the title should happen but the articles should be deleted on notability grounds. There is no indication that these lists are notable. There is no coverage independent of Time. Also Wikipedia is not a mere collection of source material. . If shown to be notable the articles should talk about the lists, not reproduce them whole
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTREPOSITORY)

Comment: The list articles fail to address the notability of the lists in question. The lists have been printed by its creator (making Time a primary source). To be notable, it must have been covered in a non-trivial fasion by reliable, secondary sources, independent of the matter at hand. Thus, the topic fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)