Deletion of Greg Wain

Comment: JonoL, you quote the correct Wikipedia guidelines above. However I don't see how Mr. Wain meets these. A fundamental policy of Wikipedia is |verifiability which states that the ultimate criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is ''verifiability not truth''. In other words we need |reliable sources that provide evidence for your claims of notability. In particular, the notability claims seem to be around the "Wain-Mayer" model of emotional intelligence. Has this work been peer reviewed? It appears from the article that it has just been distributed around a set of schools. That alone would not meet the |professor test. However, if this work has been published in a reputable scientific journal, Mr. Wain would meet the |notability test. In that case I'll happily change my vote here to Keep. Good luck
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: not-notable. My bias towards The Southport School|the School is quite irrelevant as a) he clearly fails  as this is a vanity page for a non-notable pedagogue and b) he became headmaster after I departed and I thus have no relations or personal acquaintance with him. We do not have pages for the headmasters of every school in Australia just because they are well-known in their field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: this nicely written, well structured, well formatted, properly Wiki-linked article. I hope the editor will create similar articles on more-encyclopedic topics. The only cited source is a one-paragraph biographical sketch from a school website. He has no hits in Google Books, a personal touchstone of mine. Greg Wain does not meet the  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)