Deletion of E-fluentials

Comment: I'm not sure I agreee this is a  violator, but it does appear to be a  that is not used outside of viral marketing websites and a few Tucker Max fancruft sites... no opinion yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NEO)

Comment: per Tyrenius and others.  This is |vanispamcruft masquerading as a neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)

Comment: A http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=E-fluential&meta= Google search shows it is not |original research. It is a term that is being used by different organisations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)