Deletion of Skinshift

Comment: Article still fails  and ; the televised links are promotional, and other coverage is self-published or advertorial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Article is about a line of skin care products.  Advertising, sourced entirely to self-published material, and makes medical claims without |medical sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: Fails  (not to mention that there seems to be a possible  problem with the main contributor going by the talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:COI)

Comment: reluctantly). The article may have originally been spammy, but has been purged of that and its appearance on the TV shows and in the newspaper article are enough, if barely, to indicate that it is |verifable and thus notable. I might not have felt that way if the only RS was the newspaper article, which looks suspiciously like a regurgitated press release, but the TV coverage is enough. I would note that the three current links to those TV appearances are to Vimeo, not to the original broadcasts, and are almost certainly improper as prohibited links to material which is a copyright violation (see ), but they do show that the appearances did occur and that's enough to satisfy 's requirement of verifi'''''ability'''''. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:ELNEVER||WP:V)