Deletion of Andrew Schlafly (5th nomination)

Comment: AFD is not fC|RfC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: He may be |fringey, but is notable and a public figure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: or redirect to Conservapedia. Fails  due to lack of reliable and independent secondary sources with significant coverage specifically of him. He should be mentioned in the articles about other right-wing causes he is linked to. With respect to the argument "as Phylis Schlafly's son..." notability is not inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Public figures are notable per  and it's hard to argue that this person is not a public figure in light of increasing amts of coverage (e.g. the http://ccinsider.comedycentral.com/2009/12/04/colbert-to-interview-conservapedia-founder-andrew-schlafly/ Colbert interview). Respectfully
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: In response to the  reference, I guess I should've included my later comment about being contraversial as point 5. I feel that it is fair to point out that Other Crap Exists in this case - because other crap which is a lot less contraversial passes, and this doesn't. I feel like a higher standard of notability is being called for, due to the controversy. And that isn't a notability guildline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)