Deletion of Ida Genung

Comment: unless sourced. A "regional celebrity" suggests a claim to notability so it can't be speedied, but searching for "Ida Genung" on Google comes up with Wikipedia mirrors and not a lot else. Admittedly, there may be only offline sources because she died quite a while ago, but the burden is on anyone wishing to keep. Without sources, this person is |not-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Both sources already in the article are reliable.  Google web tests are essentially useless for historical figures, which is why they are not part of  or any of our other notability criteria.  Google Scholar and Google Books are much more useful, but didn't help in this case.  Looking at the article on the book, we she she gets one of 16 chapters in it.  Using special:booksources by clicking on the ISBN, we can go to the Library of Congress website and learn that the book has 137 pages, so there should be roughly 8 pages on her in that book.  Local history museums are generally a source of content that is at least as reliable as the typical newspaper, and that is what the linked web-source is.  Sources don't have to be notable, the article's topic does.  However, the history museum webpage is only a passing mention, so we only have one source thus far
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)