Deletion of B.O.W.s (Resident Evil)

Comment: to List of Resident Evil creatures. Arguments about inclusion vs. deletion notwithstanding, after going over the article I find that it is essentially a list article that serves the same purpose as the "List of RE creatures" article. In fact, the 2 articles seem to repeat much of one anothers' info. There seems to be no well-reasoned argument for having 2 list articles essentially devoted to the same subject matter that don't have a substantive difference in content. This article is mainly in-universe character/plot summary and IMHO in its present state probably matches several criteria of , as it lacks real-world commentary and cites zero sources. I am not opposed to the article's subjecty matter ''per se'', but I believe the best way to cover it is in a single article about the series' creatures with encyclopedic, real-world discussion citing reliable published sources. Exactly what scope, discussion and coverage would be best in such an article is a separate discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Fails . What few sources are cited fail to provide evidence of |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: per . Nothing to merge. The only relevent parts of this article for an encyclopedia are the empty "Production and design" sections
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)