Deletion of 2013-14 Guernsey F.C. season

Comment: per , nowhere near a high enough level to be considered a "top professional league". Fails GNG with only coverage of the season being individual |routine match reports. I am not seeing any significant coverage on the season as a subject in itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:MILL)

Comment: I'm seeing rather an very unusual amount of media coverage - and not local - for a team playing at such a low level. I haven't gone through in detail, though I've seen some for the 2012-13 season that would seem to meet .  Are we on the right track here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  by receiving significant non-routine coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  Examples are http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/23588869, http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/23000377, http://guernseypress.com/news/comment/rob-batiste/2013/08/31/gfc-its-time-for-some-payback/. For future reference, here's an excellent one for 2012-2013 http://guernseypress.com/news/comment/rob-batiste/2013/05/11/gfcs-heroics-sees-local-game-come-full-circle/. I'm also troubled by the nomination, that notes that many of the references on the page are routine - so? It's a season's article, even for a top team, many are routine; surely if the nominator thinks that some of the references aren't routine, then the article shouldn't be nominated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)