Deletion of Other researchers who claim or may claim their crucial roles in the discovery of graphene

Comment: I could see a place for an article that listed graphene researchers and their contributions to their subject, although it seems an extremely narrow focus. But that's not what this is: it selects only some subset of (supposedly underappreciated) researchers, and includes editorial evaluations of their work. Along with the problem of |original research by synthesis (pulling together information on these different researchers despite the lack of sources that treat them as a group), the large quantity of editorialization is seriously unencyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Indeed a clear case of  and . Assessments of this nature are best made a long time after the event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: for reasons given. any valuable references and text belong in the graphene article. this also a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)