Deletion of William Christison (CIA)

Comment: not notable, fails ...just another example of a disgruntled former federal employee
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Little online presence despite the controversial nature of 9/11 conspiracy nonsense http://www.google.com/search?q=%22William+Christison%22+-wikipedia+-answers.com&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=180&sa=N, and nothing implying notability through |reliable sources. As for his work for the CIA, doesn't appear to be enough to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: More 9/11 nonsense. This conspiracy theorist (who appears to fail ) says American Airlines Flight 77 didn’t hit the Pentagon? I guess it flew to the Bermuda Triangle then. Delete per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom.  Endless reserves of conspiracy cruft advocacy stuff out there I guess.  Violates , , and Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BALLS||WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: per nom and Fuhghettaboutit's wonderful research in narrowing down the google search and digging through the blogs. The fact of the matter is he is not the subject of items that have his name included and is not notable by himself. The 9/11 conspiracy theory sites just inflate his google popularity, but those fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)