Deletion of Stephen Brint Carlton

Comment: Local official that fails , not close to meeting , and the problems raised by  and  were already noted above.  Agree with the other delete voters on all points
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:RESUME||WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY)

Comment: does not meet ; a weakly sourced vanity page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: County-level judges do not get an automatic  pass just because they exist, and no |reliable source coverage has been shown to get him over  in lieu — of the two "sources" here, one is his own |primary source profile on the county's own website, and the other is Ballotpedia, a |user-generated content site which includes content about ''every'' single candidate for ''any'' elected office in the entire United States, and thus doesn't constitute proof of notability per se
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:USERG)

Comment: No indication that the notability guidelines set forth in  are met. I find no substantive coverage in third-party sources to suggest that  is met here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . The subject is an official in a rural county of about 80,000 people. The article is highly promotional and filled full of unreferenced assertions about details of the subject's life. This is because it seems that the subject himself wrote the article, and is writing from personal knowledge rather than summarizing reliable, ''independent'' sources, as is required. The evidence that this is an |autobiography is very strong. Autobiographies are ''highly discouraged'' here on Wikipedia. The editor has a clear |conflict of interest which must be declared
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY||WP:COI)