Deletion of Lord of Darkness

Comment: I agree that there are ,  and  issues. It's written mostly in-universe. Just because we know it's a fictional character from a movie doesn't mean the prose can put it in-universe. Being a character from a single movie and with no references outside of the movie itself does not assert notability for an article. Any relevant information can go into the article for the movie, providing it's backed by some references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:FICT||WP:WAF)

Comment: This article has #PLOT and  issues. It isn't enough to say "X is a fictional character in Y" to give an article's subject real-world context. The influence on the development of Ganon might be a consideration; however, the concession that a source ''can't'' be found doesn't help the article's prospects
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT)

Comment: why did this go to deletion discussion at all?  The problems with this article could have and should have been handled via citation tags and the article's talk page.  Also, see .  One of the problems cited, "in-universe", is totally incorrect - the article is clearly about a fictional character from a movie.  Most of the article is an articulate and perceptive description of the character and the story in which he is portrayed, which can be verified by simply watching the movie.  The ''primary'' source, the movie (also a "primary source"), is provided in the first sentence. For more about the use of "primary sources" see  and the Wikipedia talk:No original research#Fiction in Wikipedia|debate about fiction on it's talk page.  I've seen the movie, but I appreciate the character "The Dark Lord" more now that I've read this article, which makes me want to see the movie again!  Also, this subject has great potential for expansion, such as including information about that incredible make-up job, who designed it, what it was made of, how long it took to apply, etc.  And I'm certain that Tim Curry had something to say about his role, and that can be included as well.  Definitely a keeper.  Let Illustrious One develop the article further, as he is obviously interested in doing so.  If the article hasn't been improved to your satisfaction within a month, bring it back here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:PSTS)