Deletion of Taki Toa Shield

Comment: it was all of those things, but all of those things are |fix-the-problem sort of problems, so I did. It's not hard to add a proper heading, fix the image, and add a couple of references. Please, for the love of God, when will people understand that inclusion, or not, is about |notability, and not the current quality of the article you stumbled across. It's been tagged like that since 2014 and most of the coverage relates to the ANZAC Anniversary tournament in 2015 (a year later).  exists for a reason. With that out of the way, let's see if we can assess the sources here which include (for a '''''sporting tournament''''') at least one academic study of Maori culture in Australia. The tournament has been going on for 30 years, includes multiple senior-club winners, and is (or was) a mainstay of the Maori community cultural calendar
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM||WP:N||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I would say it was per  but all of the problems were easily solvable ones and required little to no effort. Significant coverage in major ''academic'' studies https://kohanga.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/maori-in-australia.pdf like this one probably gets it over the line in terms of notability. Again, this is a ''sporting tournament'' considered so significant to a particular community that its impact on the diaspora has been the subject of academic analysis... alongside the usual coverage that we'd expect for sporting tournaments. The total lack of  here is enough to oppose this nomination on principle alone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:BEFORE)