Deletion of Nailin' Paylin

Comment: If it is indeed produced by Hustler, a notable publisher, then it may come to meet the notability criteria after its publication.  For now, however, as the film has not even finished shooting, and the only source is a blog, |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would seem to apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Please. Wikipedia is #NEWS|not news, particularly not sub-tabloid quality news about short term publicity stunts. What's more, this is a |future film whose cited sources are online websites that spread porn industry gossip. Notability is nonexistent, taste is awful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FF)

Comment: according to the article it is in "pre-production" which means it doesn't meet the future films criteria. | wikipedia is NOT a news or gossip site and we shouldn't be operating as one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Just way too many independent reliable sources about the subject that is the basis of . I look at notnews and don't think this is routine coverage of tabloid journalism. If it was just TMZ and People that was reporting on this, then sure but not when mainstream newspapers are involved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a |crystall ball and even if this is released there's no indication it will be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)