Deletion of Komprise

Comment: Does not show sufficient notability at this time.  Editor also created an article about the (probably non-notable) COO of this company as their only other significant contribution, which definitely raises another red flag on the |COI/|PAID issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:PAID)

Comment: fairly high chance of this being a commissioned work given the editor's knowledge of lingo such as 'deorphan', categories, infoboxes etc. In addition the sources are simply |insufficient to meet our bar for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: An article on a start-up and its product (and for which I have reminded the contributor of  and the  obligations). A large proportion of the text and references are about company funding, which is routine for start-ups, and the remaining ''Features'' section is largely promotional in tone. The Gartner analysis reproduced in "Storage Newsletter" is the best of the references, providing a c600 word appraisal of the product proposition relative to others in the market. I don't think that new product review is sufficient to demonstrate |encyclopaedic notability at this point though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (:WP:COI||:WP:DISCLOSE||:WP:CORPDEPTH)