Deletion of Women in the Dirt Landscape Architects

Comment: http://www.google.ca/#hl=en&source=hp&q=%22Women+in+the+Dirt%3A+Landscape+Architects%22&meta=&aq=f&oq=%22Women+in+the+Dirt%3A+Landscape+Architects%22&fp=a4394be9571ea68b Google and http://news.google.ca/archivesearch?q=%22Women+in+the+Dirt%3A+Landscape+Architects%22&um=1&ned=ca&hl=en&scoring=a GNews searches turn up no reliable sources that discuss the film directly in detail and in a non-trivial manner, providing no evidence that the film meets . The lack of sources also means no proof that the film meets notability criteria #1, #2, #4 and #5 of F. The article does state that the film has won an award from American Society of Landscape Architects, as evidenced http://www.asla.org/2009studentawards/188.html here. However, this awards does not qualify as a "major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking" as required by criterion #3 of F since the award is not given out by a body related to the film industry nor was it awarded for filmmaking as much it was awarded for its subject matter. There exists no indication that the film meets any of Wikipedia's notability criteria, the article should be deleted without prejudice towards recreation should the film become notable at some point in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NF)

Comment: Completely unnotable "student" film that was clearly created by someone affiliated with the film. The single claimed award is not a major one in any way, and it has no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Fails  and F
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NF)