Deletion of Chuck Missler (4th nomination)

Comment: although Missler is (in)famous for a number of things, none of these things appear to have gotten any substantial coverage in reliable sources (and on the peanut butter issue, I've yet to see ''any'' coverage at all in reliable sources). He appears to fall into an area analogous to 's "It is possible for an academic to be notable according to this standard, and yet not be an appropriate topic for coverage in Wikipedia because of a lack of reliable, independent sources on the subject." I do not think that we have sufficient information on him to create an article that isn't a series of bizarrely-disjointed (and often poorly documented) snapshots
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: per KillerChihuahua and because this article does meet . Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per B. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)