Deletion of Death of Casey-Lyanne Kearney

Comment: because of the attention it got initially and beyond that for quite some time. For a while now it has not been any updates as expected before trial and further developments concerning that but we cant deny its initial extensive coverage. Also per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRIME)

Comment: Lots of coverage, even international coverage, does not mean the coverage is anything other than routine. Not only is the duration of coverage an issue, but also the |depth of coverage. The sources provided basically say "this crime occurred" and detail how it occurred, but give nothing of any significance beyond that. Reports on the crime epitomize routine news coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: the article makes no mention to why this murder is any more significant that the countless number of murders every day. This appears to have received lots of news coverage, as  says ''While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: or '''incubate'''. Ultimately, this comes down to , and this is lacking in duration. The coverage hasn't really gone beyond a standard news cycle, and whilst it might crop up again when the case comes to trial, that's very much . Is there any way of transferring this information to Wikinews
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Damn. There are several articles from reliable sources with substantial coverage, satisfying 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)