Deletion of Sukhada Kane

Comment: Lack of significant coverage (i.e. at least 2-3 paragraph dedicated to subject) in multiple reliable sources makes subject ineligible to meet  or any other Wikipedia's |notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: I had a look at the sources and the analysis of the English language ones. Sorry but the analysis is correct and it cannot help satisfy GNG - we are strict about our RS requirements. The scanned copies seem to be local news articles - which I am hesitant to use because (1)We don't know how reliable the source is and (2)Local sources give undue weight to certain aspects. From what I looked, the subject is a local musician but nothing suggests they they are notable at a regional/national level. As the coverage is sparse, I will go for a delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WHYN)

Comment: Never heard of a thing like "exception to notability guideline"; I don't believe we have any such article on any topic. The article is presently ed, to hide the lack of "substantial coverage" in "multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)