Deletion of List of literary works with eponymous heroes

Comment: copied from the sister debate on eponymous heroines) The debate is whether or not we consider this to be an indiscriminate collection of information. Although the list could use a bit of cleanup, the info in there is easily verifiable so  is really the sole thing to worry about. While I personally see no great value in such a list, it could be kept on the grounds that Wikipedia is not paper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: arbitary list that fits  perfectly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is perhaps not paper, but we do have standards. One important one is , which is violated whenever a list requires a "judgment call" as to whether something fits on the list or not. By way of example, List of characters in Harry Potter is not OR-a character either is in Harry Potter or is not, that requires no judgment on the part of an editor. On the other hand, a hypothetical List of evil characters (and that better not turn blue!) would require OR-who decides who is evil? Would Darth Vader qualify, given his eventual turnaround? This would require a judgment call and would therefore be an unacceptable subject-and so does this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: The nominator may not want to have this deleted, but if he was looking for feedback and to have other matters assessed, that's what the article's Talk:List of literary works with eponymous heroes|talk page is for. Now that it's here, I believe it's open to the community to consider whether or not it ought to be kept. I do not see the encyclopedic value of this article. It simply appears to be |trivia and nothing more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)