Deletion of David Hogg

Comment: given the recency of the attack, , and our standing policy on ecentism, I'd be in favor of merging all the articles regarding this subject (including Never Again MSD, Emma Gonzalez, Cameron Kasky, et al.) with reactions to the Stoneman Douglas shooting, until and unless the activism shown by these young individuals is sustained; a deletion would also be acceptable, so long as the information here would be noted in some form on the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:R)

Comment: I'm not so sure about some of the other articles on other survivors but this one is most definitely notable, with the subject being extensively covered in reliable sources https://www.google.com/search?q=David+Hogg+trump&rlz=1C1GGRV_enUS754US754&oq=David+Hogg+trump&aqs=chrome..69i57.4423j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8. As far as the nom's claim that "systemic bias" applies because we don't have articles on mass murders at schools in Asia and Africa (maybe because they don't happen like they do in US), it's not. Iit's actually a  argument which invalidates the rationale put forth by the nom (and frankly, it's a silly argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Non-notable individual.  If the individual still is involved significantly on a national scale in a year with gun control, certainly we should reconsider.  rystalBall prohibits us from looking into the future to determine future notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: The situation as it is happening is making him significant.  doesn't apply if the person is unlikely to return to a low profile, and the presence of conspiracy theories surrounding him makes it likely he is going to continue to be in the spotlight. Either way, there is |significant coverage of him outside of surviving a school shooting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: NN 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: He's been in the news for a mere two weeks -- and on top of that, only for ''reacting'' to the shooting. That is maybe sufficient justification for a blurb somewhere, but is not one for a standalone article. However, the ongoing reaction to the shooting (debate, possible new laws/restrictions/regulations) is admittedly one of the more distinctive parts of this incident, and Hogg plays a significant role within that aspect. Over the next couple weeks, it's possible that his notability could move beyond , by becoming a sustained activist over a period of time (principally unconnected from the incident at Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS). In order to balance the potential that he'll just be washed out in the next news cycle against that of premature deletion, I think that the article should stand as-is for several weeks. I propose to close this AfD "without prejudice" so it can be reopened in several weeks. If nothing's really changed by then, I would '''merge''' this article, and those of Cameron Kasky and Emma González, into Never Again MSD. '''&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: Notability already on the decline, less press coverage of the tragedy now and other things entering the news cycle. Think this one is  and ecentism
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:R)

Comment: this is a textbook example of .  The aftermath of the shooting is the same event as the shooting.  If he still plays a significant role in an important gun-control group in a year's time, he will likely be notable then, but that's .  "Being a subject of conspiracy theories" is an atrocious reason to suggest this person is a public figure or notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: This is a textbook example of  where the subject is notable only because of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. His role in the shooting does not appear to be substantial, and it is also too early to tell if the coverage is extensive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: meets  per . Hogg's actions in the last week and the resulting publicity and reporting support, in my opinion, that this is not 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:HEY||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: clear case of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: At this point, I think most of the arguments that are going to be made have been made and that it is evident that the article will be kept. As such, I would humbly suggest the possibility of '''ING''' the discussion. As I have made my opinions clear earlier, I will not be the one doing so, however, and given the nature of the debate, I don't think non-admine closure would be wise
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: with numerous reliable independent references which discuss him in-depth such as https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/21/us/david-hogg-conspiracy-theories-response/index.html here and https://www.thedailybeast.com/parkland-teen-survivor-david-hogg-welcomes-the-conspiracy-theories here and https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/20/business/media/parkland-shooting-media-conspiracy.html here and https://www.cbsnews.com/news/david-hogg-shooting-survivor-responds-to-being-called-an-actor/ here and http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article201199494.html here.  does not apply here because there are several angles here: (1) surviving the shooting (2) becoming a gun-control advocate (3) helping to form the group Never Again MSD (4) going to Tallahassee to advocate for gun control to state legislators. The BLP1E says   |If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event but the school shooting is over -- now Hogg has become a student leader of an activism campaign -- clearly a second event. Hogg is getting consistent national and https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-students-plan-protests-washington-march-for-gun-control-after-florida-mass-shooting/story-wvU0cOtevrOraHUZzud6dM.html international attention and easily meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)