Deletion of Ceridian

Comment: Passes . Source examples: http://books.google.com/books?id=p8gScvl9lucC&pg=PA76&dq=%22Ceridian%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mH2fU5OyDYi-oQTwoICwAg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Ceridian%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=bkBRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT233&dq=%22Ceridian%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mH2fU5OyDYi-oQTwoICwAg&ved=0CEQQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Ceridian%22&f=false, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/31/business/31deal.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=Ceridian&st=nyt&oref=slogin&, http://books.google.com/books?id=dWWOAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA185&dq=%22Ceridian%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mH2fU5OyDYi-oQTwoICwAg&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=%22Ceridian%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=rRobAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA95&dq=%22Ceridian%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mH2fU5OyDYi-oQTwoICwAg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Ceridian%22&f=false. The article does not have a promotional tone, in my opinion, and instead asserts the company's significance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: There are numerous in depth sources such as this one http://books.google.com/books?id=bkBRAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT233&dq=ceridian&hl=en&sa=X&ei=X6iYU-KmL7K_sQSJr4GYCQ&ved=0CDwQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=ceridian&f=false. It would seem to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)