Deletion of Mannequin Challenge

Comment: per above, the subject of the article as had a lot of coverage and most definitely passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this passes .. Even Hillary Clinton led her campaign team in doing one. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2016/nov/08/hillary-and-bill-clinton-do-mannequin-challenge-video here, http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/08/hillary-clinton-mannequin-challenge/ here and https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/soloish/wp/2016/10/03/why-is-the-dating-app-hinge-bashing-swipe-apps/ here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The nomination says this is "unlikely to develop any further" yet we have no clue what the future holds for this trend. The nomination also indicates that being poorly written is a reason for deletion. It's not (see ). The nomination states the sources are not credible. At the time of the nomination, there were few sources. Now, there's 30. That brings us to the last point; is it notable per Wikipedia guidelines? Given there's now sources from literally dozens of reliable news outlets,  is clearly passed. More needs to be done to improve the article, but the state of the article is not a deletion reason
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:RUBBISH||WP:GNG)

Comment: this passes . It has been covered by https://www.google.com/search?q=mannequin+challenge+wki&oq=mannequin+c&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2j69i57j0l3.1966j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=mannequin+challenge&tbm=nws many high quality sources such as New York Times, Time Magazine, NPR, and others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)