Deletion of Smintair (2nd nomination)

Comment: spaced ndash}} Passes : http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/05/business/worldbusiness/05smoke.html?_r=0, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5121786.stm, http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/07/06/1152175728493.html?page=2, http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Fasten-your-seat-belts-and-light-up-in-Germany-1544406.php, http://manager.money.pl/strategie/case_study/artykul/smintair;-;linie;lotnicze;dla;palaczy,146,0,185490.html. Plenty of indication of passing notability guidelines. Please read section D of  prior to nominating more articles for deletion. Simply opening the Google News archive link at the top of this discussion yields plenty of sources that consist of significant coverage about this topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per Tris2000 in the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Smintair|previous AfD. There's plenty of significant coverage in independent RSs (), including the http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5121786.stm BBC, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/05/business/worldbusiness/05smoke.html?ref=business&_r=0 NY Times, http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TRAVEL/07/31/smokers.airline/ CNN, and the http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/24/AR2007072402355_pf.html Washington Post. Notability is not temporary, and the fact that the company failed doesn't make it less notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)