Deletion of British Raj Apologist

Comment: The article is now redirected to Imperial Apologist and well on it's way to a pretty good looking stub.  The term Imperial Apologist is |notable and has |reliable sources.  The only thing I don't agree with is the redirect from British Raj Apologist
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: The term 'Imperial Apologist' is fairly well understood. I'm not sure about 'British Apologist' though and definitely don't like British Raj Apologist. While the term Imperial Apologist is generally used to apply to contemporary (with the Raj) supporters of the imperial mission of Britain, it is less used in modern times (perhaps because, Niall Ferguson excepting, apologists are hard to find in the academic world). In the case of this article, it would seem to me that there is an attempt to make a  |point but I would prefer to give the creator a |good faith chance to modify the article appropriately
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:AGF)