Deletion of Todd Packer

Comment: Article needs multiple independent third party sources about the character to discuss it in an out-of-universe context. Without that, it's impossible to write an article that meets  and . I wouldn't object to a redirect if there's a suitable and useful target
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT)

Comment: From {{u|Horacio Vara}}'s own arguments above (his exact words: {{green|"But at the moment it's just . There's no actual information but plot."}} Plus, a bizarre claim that this is a content fork), it's evident that this is yet another ''"The quality of the article is bad, so it must fail GNG"'' nomination. Notability requires |only the '''existence''' of reliable published sources. The quality of the current revision of the article is irrelevant. It's also impossible to "make" something notable, because |notability doesn't change based on the state of the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:NEXIST||WP:NTEMP)