Deletion of Bruce Maitland Carruthers

Comment: Quite sufficient alone https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/result?q-field0&q-type0=phrase&q-term0=Bruce+Maitland+Carruthers&q-field1=title%3A&q-type1=all&q-term1&q-field2=creator%3A&q-type2=all&q-term2&q-field3=subject%3A&q-type3=all&q-term3&q-year1-date=1892&q-year2-date=1952&q=%22Bruce+Maitland+Carruthers%22+date%3A%5B1892+TO+1952%5D&s=0 here to support  to support 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: for five reasons: '''1''' –This one also has entry in Who's Who in Australia which is authoritative reference material ''{{xt|used by academics as a resource that identifies Australia's leading individuals, and as a research tool by journalists and historian}}''. It is equivalent of Dictionary of National Biography and all its entries passes  #3. Number '''2''' and '''3''' –He passes  #1 as well as  #2 as a holder of the Officer of the Order of the British Empire, a well known and significant national honor. Number '''4''', –Passes  #3.  He was Fellow of renown academic society during his life. Number '''5''' –He received enough coverage to pass  in reliable sources as the sources in the article already show. This is another among the most misthought and careless nominations in the recent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)