Deletion of The New Electric Railway Journal

Comment: It's hard to see nominating every railroad trade reliable source as a good faith effort and at looks more like a case of  as indicated by Roodog2k.  If we go by Wikipedia:Notability (media) it easily passes the "are frequently cited by other reliable sources" clause, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22New%20Electric%20Railway%20Journal%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%22New+Electric+Railway+Journal%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=Uvn1T-qUIILu2gWl1pTMBg&ved=0CCQQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=a8e3a7bdd402f4bf&biw=1011&bih=695 just as all of these periodicals the nom has nominate for Afd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Although not currently published, notability is not temporary.  Having said that, this did pass Notability guidelines for media.  I say it's a weak keep because it may be better to merge.  But I am against outright deletion. Nom has also PRODded and put to AfD basically every article on railfan magazines, which I don't understand.  Smacks of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)