Deletion of Harry Burr

Comment: per  - local and coverage of transport issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per . I've tended to suggest deletion of articles about minors, unless they show very clearly . ''Draftify'' is fine with me. I note that, by 2021, Wikipedia has been around for 20 years, and claims that an editor doesn't know we have policies are |not as strong as they were in the past, or that |some cause deserves a spotlight is not allowed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:SIGCOV||WP:AGF||WP:SOAP)

Comment: the fact that he is 'due to be in some national press/magazines/media in the coming months' is an example of , we have no way of knowing whether he will be notable or not in the future. We can only assess his notability right now and, right now, there is not the level of coverage available to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Surely this young man will go on to wider notability but currently it's 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Possibly ; but it's more likely that the subject is like most local activists and organizers who, while noble in their pursuits, simply don't meet notability standards. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: a  search seems to find nothing of note (only his social media). This is a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Not yet a notable individual per the coverage and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)