Deletion of GN-0000 00 Gundam

Comment: it is not the detail but the notability. If it is part of a fictional series, which is notable as I said above, then yes, the series deserves a article, but not every little whimsical thing in the series, regardless of how much "detail" we could provide. That should be left to a wikia type encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a "in-universe" guide to all Gundams, look at how long the List article is! If it doesn't establish notability, then it doesn't deserve a wiki article, per  and . Also consider . (I'm reiterating what I think is the general procedure for fictional subjects such as this btw
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION||WP:NOT||WP:NOHARM)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to a related "list of ___" article. Wikipedia is not a repository for indiscriminate material, and per normal policies towards fictional material, subjects such as these, unless notable in the fiction itself (), does not deserve its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: to list. This fictional element does not have the independent notability required to have a standalone article. In fact, the '''article doesn't have a single third party source''' and is entirely a #PLOT|plot summery. It may, however, be covered by a list per . The same can be said for almost all of the other standalone ''Mobile Suit Gundam 00'' since they all have the same issues
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT)

Comment: I don't care if this article is kept or merged - just so long as it is ACTUALLY MERGED, lest we wind up with with a  situation like the one unfolding at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Gundam Universal Century mobile units (2nd nomination). Special:Contributions/208.245.87.2|208.245.87.2
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTAGAIN)