Deletion of Gigi Causey

Comment: Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FILMMAKER)

Comment: even if we say the 11-minute comedy short is absolutely and unquestionably notable (and even that's a strech), she produced it rather than directed it, so I don't think notability can be |inherited from that alone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per .http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0146592/awards  While an argument ''might'' be made that the awards were for her film, we then look to  and see that coverage, commentary and review of her workhttp://www.google.com/search?q=%22Time+Freak%22%2C+2011&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22Time+Freak%22%2C+2011&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&tbm=nws&ei=T-AhT-_rI6qqiQLuqdCGCA&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=5&ved=0CA4Q_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=9992c7e0c9fc6e58&biw=800&bih=432http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Gigi+Causey%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22Gigi+Causey%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&prmd=imvnso&source=lnms&tbm=nws&ei=E98hT53NJoSviQLNub3VBw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=5&ved=0CBEQ_AUoBA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=9992c7e0c9fc6e58&biw=800&bih=432http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Gigi+Causey%22&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1#q=%22Gigi+Causey%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbm=nws&prmd=imvnso&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=GN8hT5rqMIeIiALxgtTGBw&ved=0CA4QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=9992c7e0c9fc6e58&biw=800&bih=432 has her meeting that criteria as well. We improve stub articles on notables, not delete them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:FILMMAKER)

Comment: Lacks significant independent coverage, as for DGG's point that ''even a nomination amounts to notability'', if that is true then sources should not be so hard to find, in this case the fact they seam to be, indicates that perhaps it is not a fool proof guide. WP needs significant independent coverage not only to demonstrate notability but also to ensure that a good, well sourced and |verifiable article can be composed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Topic just meets . The first article listed below constitutes significant coverage, in which Causey herself is mentioned numerous times. The second article is very short. Hence, weak keep !vote for now until more reliable sources that address the person significantly can be found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)