Deletion of Scarborough General Hospital

Comment: There are sufficient reports and references supplied to meet the , there are also the various reports produced on the hospital by the Care Quality Commission that are independent of subject and give in depth coverage, such as http://caredirectory.cqc.org.uk/_db/_documents/RCC_Scarborough_North_East_Yorkshire_Healthcare_NHS_Trust_RCC25_Scarborough_Hospital_201104.pdf
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm a bit surprised to see this here as hospitals (certainly regional ones like this) are significant institutions. The arguments about whether something is exceptional or unusual are not  grounded in policy. The only reference (I think) to that sort of terminology is in #NEWS and , but neither of those really applies to something like a hospital which isn't an "event" and where the coverage is persistent. The aims of those policies are to stop articles being created on an event or person on the basis of a flurry of news reports. It is also very subjective - there are lots of things which aren't unique, e.g. football players, but we don't dismiss coverage of them on the basis of it being 'routine' coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:EVENT)