Deletion of Johnni Black

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Yes it is. She meets  ("The person has won a well-known and significant industry award
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: While AVN Awards winning stands, that makes the sole claim of her notability. So she fails . Also Legacypac raises a good argument of .  wise I am not able to find any multiple significant coverage in secondary reliable sources, so she fails it as well. Nothing much in my searches, and to no surprise the article relies on AVN references. TonyTheTiger's vote should be disregarded as a failure per  as the policy is cited but no reason as to why
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:JUSTAPOLICY)

Comment: Does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is passing, primary, and / or . Per much prior precedent, including several DRs, a technical PORNBIO pass -- which is dubious in this case -- does not exempt a BLP from sourcing requirements. The article on the award has been itself deleted confirming that it's not a significant award
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:SPIP)

Comment: Yes it does. You need to familiarise yourself with .  If you want to check the "major" awards, WP have a whole articles on the AVN Awards (including one for each of the 36 or so, 36th AVN Awards), which helpfully list out the "major awards" for you - one of which is "Best new starlet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)