Deletion of 3rd bundle of channel lineups

Comment: all''' And probably SNOW as well, like the other two discussions this is a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: As has been considered numerous times before, there has been no clear argument placed to keep these articles and many more like them beyond "other stuff exists", or "they might prove useful to viewers". As far as I'm concerned, and  is clear on this, a viewer can access television channels on screen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per  and the consensus already established at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Notable "List of X" channels. Also I really do not see how it fails . These "List of Channels" are not EPG|Electronic Programme Guides as '''THEY DO NOT LIST PROGRAMMES''', only channels; big difference. They do not advertise businesses or upcoming events ect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per  and the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels (2nd nomination) (probably Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels too, but I wasn't part of that consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: under . Pretty classic examples of non-encyclopedic, ephemeral lists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per  and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:GNG)

Comment: all, as it is quite well argued and established in recent AFDs that individual company channel lineup lists fail . So let's close this now and get it done; no point in dragging it out because there's nothing new to say
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: List of free-to-air channels at 28°E from this nomination because it was wrongly categorised in {{category|Lists of television channels by company}} in the first place. The article may indeed be contrary to  but it should be discussed on an appropriate basis. 28°E is the position of a cluster of satellites in space, not a broadcasting company, and the satellites are owned and operated by different firms.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astra_28.2%C2%B0Ehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutelsat_28A The article's inclusion here was a mistake
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)