Deletion of Cavenger Image Architects

Comment: First, |other stuff exists; this deletion discussion is concerned solely with the merits (or lack thereof) of this article. That said, the merits are lacking. As Cassandra 73 noted, there are minimal secondary sources. Accordingly, this article should be deleted for failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:GNG)

Comment: I can't find significant coverage for this |company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)