Deletion of Marie-Lucie Tarpent

Comment: Citation counts in Google Scholar are too low for #C1 and no other form of notability is evident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Browsing the sources out there, it seems clear that the page is reasonably accurate.  I found a https://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/documents/57088/57088E.pdf report written by Susan Marsden, who seems to be a curator at the Museum of Northern British Columbia and so was being consulted as an authority.  This states that "''Marie-Lucie Tarpent, a linguist who works with the southern Tsimshian at Kitasoo and with the Nisga’a, has contributed significantly to the understanding of the language and the importance of morphemes (the component words that make up most words).''"  I consider that this is adequate to pass , which states "''The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed''".  When athletes are routinely permitted pages just for showing up on the sport field, we should not set the bar higher for respectable scholars.  The page should be permitted to remain for further development  per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: it is noteworthy  is a guideline and it should be weighed with common sense. There's really exception here. A person described as authority in a particular discipline by reliable sources such is enough to o merit an article in a truly educational encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per , which is a flawed guideline when it comes to fields other than hard sciences and fails to take into account citation and publishing biases,http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=refinst_pubs, http://web.archive.org/web/20170615000859/https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2012/12/fewer-resources-may-explain-why-some-female-faculty-publish-less/, but nonetheless in this case supports maintaining the article. She was chair of the department of languages at Mount Saint Vincent University.https://archive.org/stream/cautbulletin48_9#page/22/mode/1up/search/Marie-Lucie+Tarpent, http://www.unb.ca/fredericton/arts/departments/french/apla-alpa/pdfs/vol21_1997.pdf. https://archive.org/details/americanindianen00leap_0?q=Marie-Lucie+Tarpent This, https://archive.org/details/rosettaproject_tsi_detail-1 this and https://archive.org/details/rosettaproject_tsi_morsyn-1 this are works not by the author, which discuss her work and could be used to improve the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per . Yes, there's no way this can be stretched to a pass of  or any other SNG. But the purpose of notability guidelines are to help us decide which topics we can write good encyclopaedia articles about. And looking it this page, I see a good encyclopaedia article. Thanks to {{u|Queen-washington}}, {{u|Thsmi002}}, and {{u|Ipigott}}, it's an informative biography of a scholar who made significant contributions to linguistics, primary sources are used appropriately, and it violates none of our core content policies. Deleting it would be a detriment to the encyclopaedia, so why delete it? &ndash;&#8239
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:PROF)

Comment: Fails rof. Unfortunately the farthest I can stretch the GS h-index is 6, which is inadequate even for an obscure field. Thanks to Andrew D https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Red&oldid=817597916 for drawing attention to this AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per Thsmi002. Agricola44 is being obtuse in response: she is an actual leader in her extremely narrow field for the purposes of that guideline. I find it a bit ludicrous to try to claim that a linguist specialising in very specific languages is really specialising in "indigenous studies"  (er, no) for the purposes of trying to end-run 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)