Deletion of Far future in fiction

Comment: notable topic - the nominator https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FFar_future_in_fiction&type=revision&diff=981439110&oldid=981432418 admits the subject is notable. . The nomination cites two essays  and  as reasons to delete: yet when our guidelines  and  are at odds with the essays - the guidelines should win here. We also have a policy that overrides guidelines and essays. . So this is a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:TNT||WP:NEXIST||WP:N||WP:ATD)

Comment: per {{u|Rorshacma}}. This is a quintessential case of "Wikipedia is not TV Tropes". I like making lists of big year numbers as much as anybody, but I'll still admit that those lists are fancruft. The dividing line for "far future" is |arbitrary, and the material gathered here under that arbitrary heading is unreliable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Per  and per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: I endorsed the PROD because #PLOT says that articles are not just retellings of plot details, and we cover fiction in a summary style, not as a series of disparate bullet points. If you rewrote it as prose, it would still fail NOTPLOT because there is no third party coverage that adds any out-of-universe context. I do see some comments (including delete comments) that this article could be completely rewritten as something that isn't just plot and primary sources, but those articles already exist by a different name if you look at examples in outline of science fiction. If someone find any secondary sources that talk about common themes in the fictional distant future, they should be added to better articles than this. There is nothing in this article that meets Wikipedia policies and it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Poorly sourced  plot summary. Per TTN comment, this is just an arbitrary list of dates in fiction that has no defining criteria for inclusion. Per Rhododendrites comment , there might be a notable topic somewhere, but there isn't one scrap of this article that should be part of an article on that notable topic. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:TNT)