Deletion of Jak & Daxter vehicles

Comment: as an un|sourced |gamers' guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: DGG has summerized this quite well. The nominator's |concerns are best met through , not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: per #HOWTO and ; as a separate article, Jak and Daxter Vehicles would have to be notable on their own merit (i.e. talked about outside gamers playing), or at least a list of them would be.  They are not, and are only relevant/useful within the context of their individual games.  There's not really much content there, ThaddeusB, just a few, broad sentences would be appropriate in "Gameplay" for each of the trilogy, so a three-way-merge would probably be more work than it's worth.  I removed the TitanSuit, fyi, as it was a direct copy of the manual. ~ Amory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: I'm going  and relisting this; it really can't be called a consensus to delete given the keep !votes at the end
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:N)

Comment: the nom sums it up.  The major problem is the lack of sources and the questionable notability of the topic.  Add stylistic issues regarding  and  and its clear that this shouldn't be here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF||WP:NOT)