Deletion of All Star Cashville Prince (2nd nomination)

Comment: The ''New York Times'' article is very significant coverage, thus satisfying . As Hullaballoo Wolfowitz said, "notable" and "successful" are not the same thing.  Someone can be "unsuccessful" and still be "notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Most of the article is written as if it is #FANSITE|a press PROMOTION|release. Artist pretty easily fails . Sure, there's a ''New York Times'' article, but it only discusses the subject's inability to become notable. As the nom mentioned, the rest of the sources are not |reliable ones
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:MUSIC||WP:RS)