Deletion of Lord Word Worm

Comment: Wikipedia has |inclusion guidelines.  Without coverage in reliable sources, the inclusion criteria aren't met.  The fact that you state that "interest and familiarity continues to grow and expand" would indicate that it's premature for an article.  I also note based on your user name and the statement "According to feedback..." that you may have a |conflict of interest
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COI)

Comment: Well, a cut about , anyway, but obviously this fails of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: The article satisfies the | General Notability Guideline criteria. With respect to concerns that there are not multiple independent sources (the CityNews article is the only reliable independent source), the Wikipedia guidelines suggest that in the absence of multiple sources, the source must reflect a neutral point of view and be credible. In addition, consideration should be given to the following: the puzzles have been syndicated and published in a major newspaper and several minor newspapers and magazines; the article includes multiple sources (some are not considered reliable, some not considered independent); it has a reliable independent source; it has a book sold online and in retail stores; the article provides an impartial, concise and clear description of the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am rather surprised that in your numerous reads of the GNG, you missed this text, which is plainly on that page: "We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, rather than representing only one author's point of view. This is also why multiple publications by the same person or organization are considered to be a single source for the purpose of complying with the "multiple" requirement."While I'm sure you have an explanation for missing that text on several passes over the page, what's more germane is that this is exactly the sort of situation leading to why  exists
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)