Deletion of Cort Webber

Comment: for both, due to references from ''Willamette Week'' and ''The Oregonian'' which make it clear they meet the test of  and . The former is a Pulitzer Prize-winning publication, and the latter is the paper of record for the state. Clearly that's enough verification of general notability, ''nowhere'' in the relevant notability guidelines is it stated you need national news coverage to merit an article. Also, note that the previous single article was about their radio program and these are biographies of the individuals. The question of notability is separate even if some material is reused. Material which is reused inappropriately can simply be removed in any case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: ndash; Neither article establishes notability using |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: local" notability doesn't cut it.  And The Weeks' circulation |numbers are a moot point in this discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:BIGNUMBER)