Deletion of Nicholas Mikel

Comment: to Fort Campbell.  Alone, it fails |notability policies.  However, I believe that the information is worth inclusion into the Campbell Fort article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Nominator's rationale that notability has diminished is not grounds for deletion per .  I would invite other to evaluate this AfD by the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts).  Once I have time to sit down and read through the article, I'll put a more substantive comment here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: per rationales of /CA (not an official guideline yet).  The subject of the article is infamous only for the crime itself.  Whilst the rationale of the nom in regards to temporary notability has passed, I see nothing that suggests further substantial analysis of the subject took place a long time after the incident in order for it to qualify for some for of historical notability.  Under such circumstances and with little material of substance sufficient for an article based solely on the crime itself, I suggest that the material included in the Fort Campbell article is sufficient for coverage of this event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)