Deletion of Public restrooms in Bratislava

Comment: The article is quite well-written, well-sourced and fascinating.  Editors who do not care for the topic have no right to delete it on such grounds - see our |policy.  I would just observe that the title should use British English rather than American, as Bratislava is in the EU, not the USA
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CENSOR)

Comment: nbsp; After skimming this article, I don't see why the nominator wants this article listed at AfD; fact is, the nomination does not make a complete argument for deletion, nor does the word "delete" in bold using an argument listed at  constitute an adequate !vote.&nbsp; So the best thing would be to get this speedy kept #1 with WP:NPASR within 24 hours of nomination, so that the nominator can decide if he/she is willing to do some additional work to prepare the rest of the community for a deletion discussion.&nbsp; Given that parts of the lede appear to be WP:OR, there could be content problems, but to separate this possibility from good material it would help to show that the Hungarian sources are not adequate.&nbsp; Beyond that, it helps if an AfD nomination explains why the content is so objectionable that it cannot be merged.&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:SK)

Comment: per  (which overrides all  considerations according to  itself: "A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets the general notability guideline below, and is not excluded under What Wikipedia is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: OTTRAVEL for the actual list and  for the rest. I couldn't see merging any of it into the main article. The citation issue is not a reason for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per .  North Amer. has done a great job of showing the sources prove this is |notable generally.  What makes the subject notable is that the WCs in this particular city are so much worse than other cities in the 1st/2nd world.  We have lots of weird stuff on Wikipedia - |and it's a bad argument to claim it should be deleted merely because it's weird.  Hell, we have |lots of weird stuff here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG||WP:ATA||WP:ODD)