Deletion of List of fictional films (3rd nomination)

Comment: extraordinarily |crufty, it's |poorly sourced, and lacking encyclopedic merit because it's nothing but a slavish accumulation of trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT||WP:V)

Comment: to Fictional film or '''delete'''.  Does not satisfy .  Could perhaps be selectively merged to fictional film, but I don't see any call to do so.  If there are any actually notable examples, they can be mentioned in that article.  Basically, it looks like generic istcruft|list cruft to me: few (if any) notable entries, no real attempt at independent sourcing, and indiscriminate inclusion criteria.  This is the sort of obsessive pop culture trivia catalog that I would expect to find on Wikia or TV Tropes, not Wikipedia
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:L)