Deletion of John C. Anderton

Comment: fails  with no substantial coverage from in-depth, independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the book he has illustrated could be covered under point 3 of  ie. "3.The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.", the book does have a Birds of South Asia. The Ripley Guide|wikiarticle, but whether this is enough to warrant a standalone article for him? .. a few lines about him could be added to that article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST)

Comment: I made a good faith search for independent reliable sources discussing Anderton and found nothing. The only source in the article is the book he illustrated, which is not independent so does not establish notability. {{u|Andertonian}}, we do not make deals like that and you should not be editing the article anyway due to your conflict of interest. If you want the article saved, then bring forth |reliable sources. That is all that matters in this debate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)