Deletion of Christopher Rage

Comment: I found some sources http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0706430/biohttp://www.imdb.com/name/nm0706430/ and brief mentions of him in two books https://books.google.com/books?id=PwwN5BInAucC&pg=PA335&lpg=PA335&dq=%22Christopher+Rage%22+actor&source=bl&ots=KMTgynBYui&sig=N5rwN_LN61YE_On3V_FC_M1M7OM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAzgKahUKEwia4uqr67jIAhVKlIgKHU3YBpQ#v=onepage&q=Christopher%20Rage&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=yRsYON5rFiYC&pg=PA113&lpg=PA113&dq=Christopher+Rage+actor&source=bl&ots=1_QA1_qh4C&sig=oLZIBAN9bFR6LOGIidkR5eYdHzs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CGQQ6AEwDmoVChMI-M_d5-q4yAIVEaSICh2r7A17#v=onepage&q=Christopher%20Rage&f=false, but this actor fails  and I believe that it fails  as well. GNG assumes notability if the person "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Are there sources? Yes. Secondary, independent, and reliable sources? Yes. But... is there ''significant coverage''? ...significant coverage that "addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content?" The answer to this is '''no'''. Absolutely not. The sources I found outside of IMDB were simple mentions of his name in two novels about gay pornographic films and acting; they did not significantly cover him in-depth. In fact, they didn't cover him much at all. I took a look at both of the Google Books sources provided by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: No  Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:5D30:8800:B8FF:3F79:468:521E|2A02:C7D:5D30:8800:B8FF:3F79:468:521E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: As per otability (people): People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)