Deletion of Cindy Callaghan

Comment: a gsearch for reviews brings up plenty, but most of them are not |useable, but thank goodness for the US library system:), that shows reviews of https://catalog.wccls.org/Mobile/BakerAndTaylor/Review?ISBN=9781442402683&UPC=9781442402683&position=3 ''Just Add Magic'', https://catalog.wccls.org/Mobile/BakerAndTaylor/Review?ISBN=9781442466531&UPC=9781442466531&position=1 ''Lost in London'', https://catalog.wccls.org/Mobile/BakerAndTaylor/Review?ISBN=9781442489509&UPC=9781442489509(pbk.)&position=2 ''Lucky Me'', https://catalog.wccls.org/Mobile/BakerAndTaylor/Review?ISBN=148142601X&UPC=148142601X&position=4 ''Lost in Paris'', https://catalog.wccls.org/Mobile/BakerAndTaylor/Review?ISBN=9781481442824&UPC=9781481442824(hardcover)&position=7 ''Lost in Rome'' (they may be "trade reviews" but still okay for ), and ''Just Add Magic'' https://kcls.bibliocommons.com/item/show/854722082_just_add_magic?section=additional_info# appears pretty popular ie. 16 copies, none available, also Kirkus Reviews|kirkus has reviewed ''Sydney Machenzie Knocks 'Em Dead'' (yes i know some editors aren't comfortable with recent kirk reviews, but this one is critical - "A deeply flawed story of hidden history literally buried within a small white town."), but there is only really one review for each title so more are needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: does look like  and a GNG failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: doesn't pass  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)