Deletion of Civil Conflict (college football game)

Comment: It may not be a "rivalry", but whatever it is, it clearly meets  just from the sources in the article. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: We do not have stand-alone articles for two-game rivalries or game series.  That's silly.  I remind everyone above who has already commented, that notability is ''not'' the only measure of a topic's suitability for a stand-alone Wikipedia article.  This is a news article about a dispute whether a rivalry exists per ; that is not a suitable basis for a stand-alone rivalry article when other viable alternatives to preserve the content exist.  Per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The nom appears to take issue with whether this event ''should'' be notable, but that's irrelevant to determining whether it ''is'' notable. Based on sources in the article, it passes . I would agree with a need for a copyedit, though, as it may be factually untrue to call this a rivalry game if one team denies its existence. I'll discuss that on the talk page, as that likely will be controversial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)