Deletion of George Herbert, 8th Earl of Carnarvon

Comment: I think I'm coming down on the side of keeping articles on peers or their heirs, whether or not they sit in the House of Lords, as all their predecessors did (and therefore all meet ) and it would be slightly odd and not of value to the project to break the chain of Wikipedia articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: notable per , although sources need to be improved. A major landowner (and godson of HM the Queen) who owns a tremendous collection of Egyptian antiquities and the house used as the location of Downton Abbey. ''NB'' also the comment of Jimbo Wales at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Gordon, 7th Marquess of Aberdeen and Temair and elsewhere: "There is usefulness in having a compete set of entries on hereditary peers, even if some peers are less prominent or noteworthy than others, even when the article must of necessity remain something of a stub.  Considering these articles in isolation, i.e. not noting that they are part of a wider series, is mistaken
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Clearly meets the |general notability guidelines. And a quick look at Google reveals the existence of numerous other sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)