Deletion of Rebecca Oswald

Comment: I have a subscription to http://www.highbeam.com this press archive, and couldn't find anything but very local coverage, and none of it substantial. There are other ways the subject could pass the notability criteria at  in the absence of substantial print coverage. But I'm afraid this still doesn't pass. Music played by highly notable ensembles or soloists in major venues? No evidence of this. Two recordings with a notable record label? One recording, ''October wind'', self-published. Winner of a notable and prestigious award for composition e.g. Guggenheim Fellowship, Rome Prize, Charles Ives Prize? No evidence of this. Multiple scores published by well-known music publishing houses and widely held in libraries? Her WorldCat identies http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/np-oswald,%20rebecca%20anne One and http://www.worldcat.org/wcidentities/lccn-no98-36617 Two show a total of 3 scores in 3 library holdings, one of which is her Master's thesis and the remaining two are self-published. The scores for the pieces on the ''October wind'' recording are self-published at lulu.com and do not appear to be held in any libraries yet. By the way, the article has several chunks copy-pasted from her website and http://www.willamettevalleysymphony.org/season/winter-2011 here without attribution
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)