Deletion of Janni Bach

Comment: WP:NSPORTS (of which  is a subsection) clearly states that "standalone articles are required to meet the General Notability Guideline."  Merely being an Olympian is not enough, it has to be shown that she meets the GNG.  I am not convinced of this based on the article and the links above.  The coverage of her is largely either press releases (and therefore not independent of subject) or falls into the "directory entry" style of page which isn't substantial enough.  Would be happy to be proven wrong by the presentation of sources that are reliable, substantial, and independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLYMPICS)

Comment: Appears to meet the  requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLYMPICS)

Comment: Whenever an article whose subject meets a criteria listed at  is put to AfD, there's simply a snowshower of keeps without any deeper analysis of the subject's notability. Subject specific notability guidelines (like the GNG) are just that: guidelines. NSPORT goes so far as to say its criterion are "merely rules of thumb" to guide editors in determining whether an article meets the . I've seen similar issues in other AfDs where editors will treat WikiProject specific notability essays as hard-and-fast rules
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLYMPICS)

Comment: per . There's also coverage http://www.sportcal.com/News/PressReleases/6799?size=100 here about her being part of the first-ever women's handball team for Australia at the Olympics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOLY)