Deletion of David I Orenstein

Comment: Does not satisfy rof
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Tomato33 appears to be confusing the notability of ''topics'' (i.e. things that might be the subject of a Wikipedia article) with the notability of ''sources''.  Sources are neither notable nor non-notable.  They may be either |reliable or not, and we really only want the reliable ones, and they may include coverage of the topic that is significant or not (and we really only want the significant coverage).  In this case, the ''Library Journal'' profile of Orenstein is both reliable and significant, and does count toward the weight of coverage for this individual.  However, it appears to be the ''only'' source which meets these criteria.  We might, possibly (although unlikely) end up with an article on Orenstein as a notable librarian, but based on available sources, not as a notable secular humanist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Subject fails . Article cites no sources thus failing . (That's an automatic delete unless fixed). Beyond which this is an obvious autobiographical . Serious candidate for G-11 CSD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BLP||WP:PROMO)

Comment: per nom. This professor is borderline notable at best. Most of the references don't meet  and the few that do refer to this individual accepting relatively obscure positions not warranting a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: All the arguments made for deletion have been valid, article doesn't meet multiple Wikipedia policies, is of a |non-notable professor, and there are several |several sock puppets adding comments and not signing them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:SOCK)