Deletion of Minolta Maxxum 9000

Comment: meets , here is a The New York Times|NYT article about it - https://www.nytimes.com/1985/08/25/arts/camera-new-35-millimeter-for-professionals.html "Camera; New 35-Milimeter for Professionals" and https://www.nytimes.com/1986/01/12/arts/camera-canon-has-entered-the-high-tech-age.html here is a 1986 NYT review of the Canon T90 that refers to the 9000 as "revolutionary", http://www.photoclubalpha.com/minolta-history-seven-decades/5/ here in an article ''70 years of Minolta'', the editor of photoclubalpha.com states "It remains a benchmark design.", and the Minolta Users Group reproduces a review in the ''Australian Photography'' magazine of February 1986 http://www.jwhubbers.nl/mug/9000.html here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I don't want to make a  argument here, but I'm curious as to why this fails  when other similar camera models on the page have articles but have not been nominated for deletion? A couple at a short glance appear to be sourced better, is there truly no way this article can pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE||WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not happy with the article's current sourcing, but I believe the sources found by Coolabahapple get this past 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)