Deletion of Aaron Bastani (2nd nomination)

Comment: I sure hope nominator appreciates that lot of us expect that, prior to making a nomination, one should conduct a meaningful and fairminded review of potential references, as per .  IMO, it would be best if all partcipants at an AFD conducted their own web-search, as many well-meaning nominators ''try'' to comply with BEFORE, but just aren't skilled enough to do so competently, or do not appreciate that meaningful compliance with BEFORE requires them to not obfuscate factors in favour of considering the topic notable.  I did my own web search.  When I looked at the results tossed up by the google scholar search I found that several scholars quoted notable phrases Bastani coined
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Regardless of the outcome of the previous AfD, the present article clearly presents a Notable individual offering original insights (per WP:PROF and WP:CREATIVE), documented in multiple |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I feel this does meet . There are sufficient third party references to Bastani from reliable third party sources, and he is referenced in several published books. While none of these sources offer "substantial" coverage on their own, I feel they are sufficient in number to meet the  notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BASIC)