Deletion of Sian Alice Group

Comment: Fairly badly in the need of expansion, but the references provided do establish a passable case for notability under #C1 (particularly the Guardian and WNYC stories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Criteria #1 of  requires that a band "... has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works..." which is what I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sian_Alice_Group&diff=prev&oldid=253048160 added links to when I removed the prod tag. Is there something wrong with all of those references? Yes, it's still a stub, but the notability should no longer be in question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Personally, I dislike filling Wikipedia with semi-notable musical groups, artists, songs, albums, bands, etc.  However, according to the established guidelines for  and , this meets the criteria.  Should be kept due to sources provided, though some of them ''are'' a little weak
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:N)

Comment: easily passes #C1. The last time I looked, the Guardian, NME, and Allmusic reviews were classed as reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)