Deletion of NYLON

Comment: Additional reliable secondary sources about the term or concept ("not just sources that use the term", per ) are straightforward to find, such as news providers https://www.ft.com/content/7cd019f6-8247-11dc-8a8f-0000779fd2ac, https://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/blog/seat2B/2010/03/will-the-new-york-to-london-route-ever-return-to-the-glory-days.html and books https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fnns3RI1xnwC&pg=PA253, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=k59UDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA34. The article is a stub but is not currently solely about the neologism and could be expanded to say more about the concept, just as the articles are about more than the neologism. (The neologism seems reasonable as a short title rather than, say, 'The New York–London financial and cultural nexus', and although I'd prefer 'NyLon' or 'NYLon' to 'NYLON', the article title is a separate matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTNEO)

Comment: It is easy to find further coverage of the concept such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hAItCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA97 Global City Network''.  It is not our policy to delete articles because they are short – see , , &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB||WP:IMPERFECT)