Deletion of Akbayan Youth

Comment: I found the sort of article that we need to establish notability http://www.zambotimes.com/archives/26226-Akbayan-Youth-Zamboanga-Participated-the-1st-A!Y-Regular-Congress.html|here.  This is an article specifically about the group and it seems to me to be from an independent source, which is crucial to determining notability.  The only remaining question (as far as this source goes) is whether it is a ''reliable'' source as per the notability policy as set out in .  I am not sure that this is a mainstream news organization, but in my opinion, it is not biased or pushing a particular point of view and probably just qualifies. Therefore, I think we have a basis for establishing notability and the article should, in my opinion, stay.  Having said that, it does need a lot of work - not least inline citations.  Young Liberals (Australia) andYoung Liberals of Canada provide examples of better articles about similar organisations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE)

Comment: Please stop nominating things without following .  Click the Google news archive search at the top of the AFD.  You can withdrawal your nomination if you want. http://www.sunstar.com.ph/network/youth-group-hits-sk-abolition Sunstar and http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=7019&publicationSubCategoryId=67 Philstar both cover this group, it notable enough to have its actions reported.  Many other search results there, which I won't bother going through.  This should be enough proof
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)