Deletion of Laura Loomer

Comment: a very clear  case with no other claims to notability. The event itself seems to be  as it's hard to see how that's a "significant current event" or a "topic of historical significance", on the contrary it will be long forgotten
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: stills seems to be me to be  as only the most recent is that noteworthy. (talk page stalker
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The in-depth profile in the ''New Yorker'' magazine this month, plus the non-trivial coverage in Time magazine and NBC Miami (March & August 2015) mean's she has enough  coverage to meet the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Added another reference, independent RS that goes into some depth on her. May meet  http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/behind-the-scenes-with-the-right-wing-activist-who-crashed-julius-caesar-laura-loomer
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Closer, I got out in front of my skis thinking the Julius Caesar play disruption coverage was sufficient to establish subject's notability without thinking of .  The non-trivial Barry University-Clinton infiltration coverage and the New Yorker profile of subject were necessary for article to pass muster, they were added after it was nominated for AfD and several delete votes. (I want to thank
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: My sense is this might just be a little  for an article.  She already has an in-depth profile in the ''New Yorker'', per the above comment.  I think she'd meet the notability requirements if she gets coverage outside of June 2017
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Article has been expanded since being nominated and no longer quite fits .  This is a Medea Benjamin-type political activist who likes to stage stunts that get some news coverage.  she's new at it , so maybe it's just  and she'll become the Medea Benjamin of the anti-Islam right.  At present, however, there is nothing like  of her.  Delete for lack of sources adequate to support notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:TOOSOON||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: With reservations will reverse myself and vote on the article as it's creator.  Believe article now passes muster based on the  subject received over the 2015 Barry University stunt (was covered multiple times as the story progressed, from coverage of release of video to the fallout coverage that followed), that went into depth on Loomer (her taping Barry U officials, covered her being a senior, honors student, communications major, president of Young Republicans, suspended from Barry U, criminal charges filed, i.e coverage was non-trivial) and the international  for the 2017 "Julius Caesar' disruption from very reliable sources (Guardian, WaPo, NY Times), the two events (Barry & Julius), both combined with Clinton campaign infiltration coverage by Time magazine in 2015, the  reasoning for articles nomination for AfD now does not fit.  Subject also received non-trivial profile coverage by The New Yorker that meets the minimum standards of .  The article has been expanded since being nominated for AfD.  Would like to thank first closer for the extended discussion, those who contributed to the article - especially since Loomer whose motivation to constantly "stir the pot" may be for her own personal gain and to generate attention (as The Washington Post mentioned on "Julius Caesar" disruption), and not for the reasons she cites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)