Deletion of Obad-Hai (2nd nomination)

Comment: and redirect. This fictional deity was briefly discussed in the academic paper http://www.concentric-literature.url.tw/issues/Animals/6.pdf “Masters of the Wild”: Animals and the Environment in Dungeons & Dragons, which is an independent secondary RS. It has an entry in a table in https://books.google.com/books?id=xNU7E01MCEgC&pg=PA204&dq=%22Obad-Hai%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjd5LylodXMAhUC-GMKHchcA1oQ6AEIPjAG#v=onepage&q=%22Obad-Hai%22&f=false Dungeons & Dragons For Dummies, a book by an independent publisher. These are not enough to meet the threshold of notability. But they are enough, along with many primary sources by different authors, to merit a selective merge of verifiable material into List of Greyhawk deities, where it already has an entry and could use the referencing, or as BOZ suggests, List of Dungeons & Dragons deities. Per the Wikipedia policies |alternatives to deletion and , merging of verifiable material is preferred over deletion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: no reliable sources from what I can tell. , Obad-Hai needs to demonstrate notability independent of the ''D&D'' franchise
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)