Deletion of Dr Robert Baker

Comment: Being a fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering meets point 3 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The award does not seem to rise to that level of notability.  It is one of several awards handed out annually by the British Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining|IOM3, whose scope of interest is rather limited.  Also, since the article cites no references, and the IOM3 site does not present an archive of winners, there is no |verification that Baker did win this award.  For the sake of |assuming good faith, I'll stipulate that he did win the award, but that, since there is no press coverage of the event, it does not appear to have been a notable event at the time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:AGF)

Comment: I've just added several sources after performing some simple Google Scholar and Books searches and followed external links in articles wikilinked from this one. (It appears that the nominator did not follow  point 4.) Together, these sources (particularly the obituary) constitute significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so it meets . He also meets Wikipedia:Notability (academics) criterion 3, as being made a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering is a highly selective honour, as is the Bessemer Gold Medal. The steel industry was a vital component of the UK economy in the 20th century, so I believe someone awarded ''the'' annual UK prize for "outstanding services to the steel industry" in 1998 is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)

Comment: with thanks to Qwfp per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)