Deletion of White people

Comment: See #CENSORED as a rebuttal to claims that it is offensive. And whether or not the concept is ''valid'', it's well-known, so we should have an article. It's not Wikipedia's buisness to decide what is and isn't valid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: These "White people" seem to be an important group today per 1,260,000 Google hits for them, exclusive of Wikipedia and its mirror sites. There should be ample reliable sources to meet , not even counting the present 85 references in the article. It has been an important legal and racial construct in various countries. It has been a census category in the U.S. for over 200 years
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WIW)

Comment: nominator appears to be violating 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)