Deletion of Busybody (2nd nomination)

Comment: albeit weak).    says ''"In some cases, a word or phrase itself may be an encyclopedic subject. In these cases, the word or phrase in and of itself passes Wikipedia's notability criteria as the subject of verifiable coverage by reliable sources. "'' - So the test we must use here is: are there enough sources that discuss busybody as a concept or a kind of person (rather than merely as a word).  There appear to be some sources in the article, and my gut feeling tells me that more are available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: The article is not a dictionary definition and, even if it were, this would not be a reason to delete because the essential point of  is that "''In Wikipedia, things are grouped into articles based on what they are, not what they are called by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)