Deletion of Bushidokan Federation

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Please read .  There are two distinct reasons for those articles existing.  1) They are about NOTABLE federations, which thus deserve articles, while this one is a NON-NOTABLE federation, and thus needs no article or 2) They deserve to be deleted too as non-notable themselves.  Neither of these possible reasons excuses this article of its shortcomings, and |notability requires that an article be referenced to ''independant'' |reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Single source (the federation itself), no matter how oft it is cited, doesn't say anything towards |notability.  Rather spammy, I don't see that this is encyclopaedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)