Deletion of James Paul Wesley

Comment: That interpretation is very far from the plain meaning of #C5 which specifically asks for a posting to a position at a step higher than full professor (i.e. a named chair, distinguished professor title, etc). There is no evidence that the subject ever held such a title
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as . I found only one third-party reference, and it is in the Natural Philosopher's database which is a personal project of two people. However, I did find about ten of his articles cited in G-Scholar with cites ranging from about 35-75. That's not huge, but given the time frame I find it mildly acceptable. However, this article needs to be greatly reduced. All of his writings need to be removed from the references and instead treated as a bibliography. The article should not include a full bibliography of his works but only selected works (which can be chosen from those most cited). The long quotes from the self-published works also need to go. And the whole family history part has to go since that's not what makes him notable. This was clearly the project of a relative or family member and is more like a memorial than a WP article. My gut feeling is that he was a bit of a crank, but that doens't keep him out of WP as long as he meets other criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: easily passes .  It also appears to have been fixed per , although your opinion may differ
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:HEY)

Comment: The article presents no evidence of influential publications or other accomplishments or honors that would take him above the level of the average professor, and is not sourced by in-depth reliably-published and independent publications about the subject. Additionally, searching Google scholar for publications by the subject did not find publications with notably high citation counts. As such, he does not appear to pass |our guidelines for notability of academics, nor our |general notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)