Deletion of Rachel Beckwith

Comment: per ,  and #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:BIO1E||WP:NOT)

Comment: This is a case of / VS .  I usually side with , except in rare cases like this.  I first learned of her on NBC nightly news and read about her in both of my local papers, so this AfD piqued my curiosity.  Her story has been told in alot of news stories.  I've redone the main section, added references to CNN, MSNBC, Sydney Australia Daily Herald and a CBS news segment.  This should satisfy  and make  a non-factor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is well-written. Reliable sources can be provided for the details of the accident. It is not in violation of  as a result of the last act of Rachel Beckwith's life. It is an undeniable fact that a fundraising attempt, initiated by Rachel Beckwith snowballed into a $600,000 inflow of money. While it is true that the tragic death of Beckwith brought about the results, the article is about the aftermath of her death. I think reliable sources amply support the noteworthiness of the fundraising efforts of Beckwith to ''"bring water to Africa
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: This is not a case of  as that applies only to living people and this girl died recently.  Instead, I think that  gives the proper guidance here.  The charitable work being done in this girl's memory is noble, but Wikipedia is not the right place to promote it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)