Deletion of Healthy energy drink

Comment: Ad |spam.  The only "reference" provided links to a Pseudoscience|quasi-pseudoscientific http://healthyenergydrink.pbwiki.com/healthy-energy-drink "healthyenergydrink" ad site, and then on to a full-on sales web site http://www.dontgivemethatbull.com/ dontgivemethatbull.com, which make essentially the same claims.  Obviously a smear campaign against Red Bull (even the coloration and styling on the ATC Energy Drink cans are similar to Red Bull's).  Approaches a #G11|CSD G11 criteria.  Also encroaches into |NPOV and |OR in the last two sentences, by first casually suggesting (and then casually denying) that drinking a typical sports or energy drink is like drinking "embalming fluid".  Classic hit-and-run posting|drive-by hit-and-run and Snake oil (cryptography)|snake oil advertising method where one plants the desired thought, and then denies it in the fine print for legal purposes (What?  No!  Who said that?  Ha-ha!...). If there is anything encyclopedic, notable, neutral, and verifiable in the article, then it can be deposited at the Red Bull, Energy drink, or Sports drink pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:CSD||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: as , and not very accurate research either, e.g. how can an energy drink be low calorie? It's a contradiction in terms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as spam. No ability to get |verifiable and |independent sources. I have no |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:COI)