Deletion of Glossary of alternative medicine

Comment: as per  - ''Wikipedia is not a dictionary''.  I would also argue that Wikipedia should not be a glossary, but that is an extension of policy that will need further discussion.  Currently, we clearly ban dictionary entries, but seem to allow "Glossaries".  The difference between a dictionary and a glossary is subtle ... To my mind, dictionaries ''define'' the words, while glossaries ''explain'' the words.  To get back to the article in question: dispite its title, the bulk of the article consists of nothing more than dictionary definitions of various alternative medicine terms.  In the few cases where the article actually acts as a "glossary" (ie it actually ''explains'' a term, as opposed to simply giving a definition of it) a seperate article can be written (or already exists) for the term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Per  as suggested above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Although  is not a good reason to keep, dictionaries do not usually have glossaries, so #DICT doesn't apply.  However, if it's been transwikied to Wiktionary, it may be adequate to include the wikitionary pointer to each article which has this in the #See Also section, and remap all links.  Pure deletion would lose significant information of benefit to readers, even if the article is deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOT)