Deletion of List of non-pornographic films featuring nudity

Comment: Wow... ''Her full-frontal nudity is frankly presented with particular emphasis on her lean, waifish upper torso, curvaceous mesomorphic hips and thick, dark pubic and underarm hair.'' While doubtless a valuable resource for teenagers whose mothers have installed web filters, it's about as unencyclopaedic as it gets.  #DIR probably covers it, but maybe we need to add |#MRSKIN to make sure. Plus the fair use policy wouldn't allow screenshots, which is what we really want in an article like this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SENSE)

Comment: Even with massive cleanup and strict enforcement of , this is an ever-growing, unbounded list based upon two terms lacking strict enough definition to avoid |original research.  As mentioned above, the definition of nudity varies by culture and time period.  How much skin is needed to qualify?  Do only certain parts apply?  What about poses and camera angles designed to conceal different regions?  As for pornography, do we use the Miller test, the Hicklin test, or Potter Stewart's  "I know it when I see it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR)