Deletion of Codeproof

Comment: I couldn't find sources to meet . The Redmond Reporter interview is the longest source out there, but it's free a weekly community newsletter with a circ of about 25,000, which gives it little weight, per . Interviews are also poor for notability in general. http://www.geekwire.com/2012/startup-spotlight-codeproof-helps-id-jailbroken-phones-malicious-apps/ This GeekWire puff is slightly broader, but it's super softball: less an interview and more a platform for the founder's musings on the industry. It's also a column which invites any startup in the region to "Apply for Startup Spotlight" which undermines any claim of neutrality. I looked, but found nothing better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:AUD)

Comment: An article on a small firm (the Redmond Reporter reference indicated founder plus one sales employee in 2014) edited by at least one  account. (The article lacks the necessary  by each such account.) The sources in the current article are a combination of primary plus local. Those in the Draft are better (though its promotional text is more appropriate for the company website where they can sell their wares) but are still routine appointment announcement and product announcements/reviews. Clearly enough to verify that this is a firm going about its business in its chosen field, but I am seeing nothing to indicate that it is of encyclopaedic notability, whether by  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (:WP:COI||:WP:DISCLOSE||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)