Deletion of Artix Linux

Comment: to Arch Linux per ; insufficent persistent in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATDM)

Comment: to Arch Linux. Its Pacman based, and not that different from Arch. I think it would go well as a single sentence/section mention on Arch Linux in the "Derivatives" section, such as "Artix Linux is closely based off of Arch Linux that uses OpenRC, runit or s6 init instead of systemd." The existing sources on the article are bad. The sources found here, not much better. Couple of blogs? A community website? That's not reliable. The arguments for keeping based on  are poor, and if anything point out the fact that we are covering waaaayy too many obscure Linux distributions. Sidenote: I'm seeing shenanigans in this AfD, with a lot of SPA comments and Linux defenders who have come out of the proverbial woodwork, closer please look at this one real careful
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)