Deletion of List of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero vehicles

Comment: to G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero#Toyline. I think there's a less compelling argument for keeping a comprehensive list of these than there is for the characters (those made into action figures), but outright deletion is unnecessary, and would hinder even the possibility of further development by blocking anyone without an admin card from viewing the history (and would also be contrary to |policy given the less harsh option of redirection
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: per Rorshacma. The section at G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero#Toyline already covers this topic sufficiently, there is no reason to have this massive cruft-y list of toys that violates  and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOG||WP:LISTN)

Comment: or '''merge''' to G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero#Toyline per above comments, per  and . If there is too much detail, the list can always be trimmed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: This is essentially just a toy catalog, and I would say falls into the territory of .  Additionally, its entirely reliant on a single reliable, independent source, the Bellomo book.  (It also cites the Santelmo book for a few entries, but assuming the title is not lying about being an official licensed book, it would not be independent.)  The overall concept of the vehicles in the toy lines is already sufficiently covered at G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero#Toyline, and this overly-detailed mass of cruft does not need to be preserved as part of that coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Cruft" is a code word for . The "already sufficient" coverage that Rorshacma points out in the G.I. Joe article is two sentences long. That may be sufficient for someone who doesn't care about the history of action figures in general or G.I. Joe in particular, but it's not sufficient for the readers who are interested in the subject and want more detail. I don't own the Bellomo book, but I've read similar toyline books and they always discuss "G.I. Joe vehicles" in general as well as each one in specific. Furthermore, I dislike the practice of deleting and merging individual pages into a massive list, and then nominating the list page for deletion. Like every list page (and most Wikipedia articles in general), this article needs more editing. Editors who want to improve the article should cut unnecessary details, and add more summary and analysis. That improvement will not happen if the page is deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)