Deletion of Branch Insurance

Comment: I declined this as a draft back in December as not meeting our notability guidelines, despite much editing in the meantime it still seems to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Fails .  Sources do not satisfy the .  For example, the first four references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: a fair amount of routine coverage, but not enough significant coverage to meet . signed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: or ''Draftify'' as per ATD. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short,  requires multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc, so "articles" which simply parrot a company announcement without adding independent opinion or analysis fails ORGIND. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Also, the excuse that it passes AfC is not a good reason to Keep as I see a lot of articles get approved from AfC where the references fail the criteria for establishing notability. I've no issues with the article being Draftified is the author is confident references can be found although my search has yielded nothing. As it stands, topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: this is non-notable corporate spam. Being accepted by a newbie afcer isn't a requirement for  and this fails CORP by a large margin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NCORP)

Comment: The majority of the sources are trivial per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)