Deletion of Mansonite

Comment: due to lack of |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Not having sources is not a reason for deletion. Reliable sources not existing is. The first needs cleanup, the second is a violation of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: 10,200 Ghits, so it should be sourceable. Lack of sources Wikipedia_talk:Speedy_deletion_criterion_for_unsourced_articles|is not presently a deletion criterion. The article goes into more detail than a simple dictionary defintion would, so does not fail , as claimed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Even if  becomes policy, the "Encyclopedia Gothica" would seem to be what it calls a "questionable source". The BBC link doesn't contain the word "mansonite" at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)

Comment: It really doesn't matter how long the article has been lacking good sources (I've seen pages tagged with notability since 2004), but it does fail , so delete this sucker
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)