Deletion of Jonty Haywood

Comment: Since my editing history has now been |nibbled at just because my opinion above was "keep" rather than (the much easier to choose) "delete", I feel the need to better explain the reasoning behind my opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: per . The beach hoax ''is'' notable and widely reported, and thus article-worthy, but notability does not inherit from the event to the person. The other website is not notable, and does not qualify as a source of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The nominator cites  as the reason for deletion, however I count at least two separate events for which this figure is notable (three if you count the "Porthemmet" road sign event as a separate news event to the hoax site event, since it came a year later), all of which are well covered in reliable sources. As an aside, I do not believe it to be relevant (or appropriate) to bring up the personal reputation of the article's subject in a deletion debate (see  and  for reasons why). Some sentences in the article could probably use a little rewording to bring them up to Wikipedia standards though. I can also see covered in the sources more information about the subject which may improve the article if it is included (for example, the fact that the subject is a graduate of the University of Cambridge, etc.). In short, this article has room for improvement, but  doesn't apply here and I really fail to see a valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NEUTRALITY||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:BLP1E)