Deletion of Twin Towers 2

Comment: Shadowjams, there are no additional sources to be found and I feel it fails on  as it is a one event idea from 2004 on a hypothetical project by one man and some groupies. ShadeofTime it is POV as this is one man's point of view on how he thinks the former WTC should be built and to boot, he is advertising that idea in this forum and has been since 2005. Recent edits within the past month have made the article a bit better but not good enough - the template that shows the model is locked and it advertises that this design is proposed even though language has been amended in the header, clearly COI. I have painstakingly read all the talk pages history and viewed the websites where this project is maintained. Personal websites on the internet do not qualify as reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: It needs additional sources but I don't see any indication it fails otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)