Deletion of Barden Corporation

Comment: and merge Barden Precision Bearings here). The company appears notable, as will be any company of this size and duration (let alone one that looks to have an interesting Norden bombsight|first cause). Although it's not yet demonstrated within the article to |our |local |standards, that's just a matter of research and copyediting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: GNews and GBooks return an awful lot of hits, spanning multiple decades, from publications with names like "The New York Times." I agree that current sourcing in the article is woefully inadequate but I disagree that the company fails . It's been the subject of substantial coverage in clearly reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Having an "interesting history", broadly construed, is the very thing that distinguishes corporations worthy of an encyclopedia article above the |average tech business promoting itself on Wikipedia.  This business not only has news hits but also ''Scholar'' hits and books hits from Google; there seem to be a fair number of in depth secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)