Deletion of Spartan (browser)

Comment: per , as reasoned by Codename Lisa
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: This is no longer a , so it is no longer a prediction, but rather a fact. Other than that, although the listed sources are poor and the article is not of good quality, more reliable news sources are popping up these few days and it is possible to rewrite the article with a huge room for improvement. This is salvageable. With a quick search with Google, it is easy to find at least five reliable sources which all provide sufficient information to put together an article. This is not worth deleting, by all standards. If it is deleted, it would be a massive problem because then Wikipedia will not have an article about the browser to be bundled with Windows 10 and successor to Internet Explorer. We would then be, not predicting a forthcoming event, but becoming seriously out-dated. Given, also, that this topic has generated such debate for keep/delete, there must be quite some traffic going on this article and many would refer to it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: While the Spartan browser was once just a rumor, it was, as of January 21, 2015, confirmed to exist by Micorsoft.  This is not a violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)