Deletion of Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation

Comment: I suppose, but this is an interesting situation and discussion. I have linked from other WP articles and added some references but these are still press-release-like and refer to MBRF activities rather than to its importance. I take the  guideline to mean that independent reliable sources are required but that in-depth discussion is not essential (usually). With the references now provided, and with those above, this bar has been crossed. The foundation certainly exists though it does seem rather nebulous &ndash; the surprising lack of in-depth coverage may well be due to cultural bias. Editorially, there is a case to merge with the Sheikh Mohammed parent article (and certainly not to delete). However, I do not like mandating a merge at AfD because a redirect without merge can all too easily result. BTW a stubby article about a United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States|United Nations Secretariat Office was recently kepthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/United_Nations_Office_of_the_High_Representative_for_the_Least_Developed_Countries,_Landlocked_Developing_Countries_and_Small_Island_Developing_States although it had a dearth of "notability references". I think it was regarded as inherently notable and in my view that applies in the present case too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NONPROFIT)