Deletion of List of GUI testing tools (2nd nomination)

Comment: All listed tools have individual articles and most are sourced,  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: mdash;If there was a  or two that had been cited to narrow down the scope of this list, I'd have a better idea of whether we're talking about embedded computing, kernel drivers, apps, high-performance computing, real-time computing, et cetera, et cetera.  Each of these domains tend to have their own set of GUI-based testing tools, but the tols don't necessarily have anything else in common.  That leads me to think that we're not going to be able to find any relevant :  if I'm a tech writer doing an overview of software testing suites, I'm not going to include testing tools for high-frequency trading programmers and tablet application programmers in the same article just because they both happen to have a GUI interface.   Quoting Wikipedia:Viability of lists: {{tq|Some topics just aren't that viable because they would be either too broad or of little interest.}}  I think that's the issue here.  No objection to refactoring the article as List of testing tools for embedded computing, List of testing tools for the Android platform, etc., so long as  exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: WP:N|Notability guideline (a guideline) does not apply to |stand-alone lists of Wikipedia articles, because  (a founding policy with the power to override all guidelines and policies below it) says:Wikipedia encompasses many lists of links to articles within Wikipedia that are used for internal organization or to describe a notable subject. In that sense, Wikipedia functions as an index or directory of its own content. Even those {{tl|citation needed}} tags are redundant, as long as the associated article adds necessary sources. Of course, individual articles failing to prove their assertions can be deleted and their entries unlisted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:NOT)

Comment: this list complies with  and has no problems that could not be addressed by normal editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LSC)