Deletion of Hudson Valley

Comment: with a side of {{facepalm}}. Will Grand Canyon be next? Seriously, though: a lack of sources in an article, and even the lack of people not adding them after long-term tagging, does ''not'' indicate a lack of notability. It can (and often does) simply mean that a well-established, historically relevant, and well-known geographical feature is, unfortunately, less popular than (for instance) the latest version of Pokémon. If the article doesn't meet Wikipedia standards, |fix it, instead of potentially having it deleted and giving the nattering nabobs of negativism yet another reason to laugh at Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: per Bushranger, LtPowers, and True Pagan Warrior. Called in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:RESCUE)