Deletion of Alison Leslie Gold

Comment: as a clear pass of #3. The article needs a lot of work, but the subject's work (as creator or co-creator) is well-known and reviewed in multiple independent periodicals, which is what #3 requires to establish notability for an author. ''The Clairvoyant'' was reviewed in ''Times Literary Supplement'', ''Publishers Weekly'', ''Chicago Tribune'', ''James Joyce Quarterly'', ''Los Angeles Times'', ''The Guardian'', ''The New York Times Book Review'', and others. ''Devil's Mistress'' was reviewed in ''The New York Times Book Review'', ''USA Today'', and ''Publishers Weekly'', among others. ''Anne Frank Remembered'' was reviewed in the ''Chicago Tribune'', ''Publishers Weekly'', ''Houston Chronicle'', ''The Globe and Mail'', and (separately) ''The New York Times'' and ''The New York Times Book Review'', among others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per #3. Article do indeed need some re-writes and additional information but that is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Meets  notability guidelines, through adaptations (#3) and awards, no doubt also with reviews of her works. AfD is not about the quality of the article, though I don't see this as promotional (the quotes in the section "Recognition as a Holocaust chronicler" are evidence of  #1: "The person is regarded as an important figure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR)