Deletion of Anna Svidersky (4th nomination)

Comment: to Mourning sickness#Anna Svidersky, which already contains all relevant information about the reaction of strangers to her tragic death.  Wikipedia is |not a memorial
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per #MEMORIAL|Wikipedia is not a memorial: "Memorials. Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (people)|Wikipedia's notability requirements." The article has been written by editors in good standing per normal policy requirements, meeting , with intense scrutinty, and any attempts by users to place tributes have been reverted. The fact that this article is viewed around 4,500 times per monthhttp://stats.grok.se/en/200808/Anna_Svidersky is more indication of widespread and lasting notability beyond any immediate circle. To not have this article would be a disservice to readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: per Ty above, and per numerous prior discussions in the previous AfDs, this article does not violate #MEMORIAL|Wikipedia is not a memorial. It is well sourced, not written by involved parties, and notability is clearly established on local, national and international levels
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)