Deletion of Barron Trump (2nd nomination)

Comment: Clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or '''Merge''' The fact that he is the child of a notable person is not a valid basis for asserting his notability. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INVALIDBIO)

Comment: Clearly meets  with the sources used having him as the focus of the articles. Special:Contributions/80.235.147.186|80.235.147.186
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Barrone Trump's birth  was widely covered in major media.  His first haircut, baptism, the furniture of his nursery, which books his parents read to hem, and the quesiton of whether Daddy had ever changed his diapers (answer: no) were covered in detail.  This article got 100,000 hits yesterday - proving that Wikipedia readers want/expect it to be here.  But the argument for keep that I am making is that children who grow up in the White House can and do get independent articles (the Obama girls have been a rare exception, despite repeated efforts to create articles about them).  The Trumps, however, have not been shy in the matter of publicizing their private lives, and those of their children.   Photos of this boy have appeared in the media at least since the baptism.  But the point is that he passes  due to intense media coverage of his life over the decade of his lifespan, and the fact that within the last few days there have been multiple, profile articles about his life published in major media
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but I do strongly suspect that this child will be in the spotlight very soon, and have extensive media coverage. (Unfortunately) I recognize  and the fact that he is not notable now, but I do think the article will have to be re-created eventually. But that's all speculative, so I weigh in with a '''Weak delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: does not pass  and is not notable on his own
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the argument of  has been advanced several times above. Let's please focus on whether the subject of the article is notable enough for a separate article ''per established Wikipedia policy'', and not on what's written about other, unrelated people
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WHATABOUTX)

Comment: per above.  At this point in his life, Barron is only |notable for being Donald's son.  Donald's other children are notable for their own business ventures and accomplishments, in addition to being part of the Trump family.  Barron may be to that point some day, but certainly is not there now, and |Wikipedia can't tell the future
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL)