Deletion of List of books portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors

Comment: This article is a straightforward |coatrack, many of the titles listed don't even belong in it (they were likely put there as a "screen" to hide the pith of what the article is meant to do) and yes, as Hoary says, this is what categories were made for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:coatrack)

Comment: to hild protection ; that makes absolutely no sense. Books with these themes scenes may advocate for or against, or make no judgment on the issue. A memoir by an abuse survivor is not an advocacy book for child sexual abuse. Mystic River (novel) is a novel containing child sexual abuse, but which is not an advocacy book. Either keep or delete, do not redirect. Special:Contributions/76.66.200.95|76.66.200.95
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: the nom's arguments are invalid and nonsensical.  This is a list of notable books grouped by a significant shared theme.  That this is a Library of Congress classification establishes for me beyond all doubt that this theme is encyclopedic and verifiable.  Redirecting to hild protection is one of the most absurd proposals I've ever seen here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)