Deletion of Sucden

Comment: I like to assume good faith, but I can't believe that the nominator made |any effort whatsoever to check for sources. When I removed the prod tag from this I pointed out that thousands of reliable sources are available from http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=Sucden&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn Google News archive and http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=Sucden&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp Google Books searches. If the nominator is concerned about references not being in the article the answer is to add some of these, not to nominate the article for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)