Deletion of FC05 Bilsthorpe

Comment: WP:FOOTYN is only an essay, not policy, and many clubs which meet those criteria still fail the |general notability guideline requirement of having significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. These do not even meet WP:FOOTYN
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assumed good faith for all of the pages you've made. It's why your talk page wasn't given vandalism warnings. The deletion tags on your talk page are only notifications, not permanent stamps of embarrassment. It's ''your'' talk page so you're completely at liberty to remove them all and blank the page notice once you've read them. Some people blank their talk page every now and again, others archive everything. I understand what you mean about being annoyed that the work is being deleted. But it's all down to a misinterpretation of consensus and  (which is entirely understandable as you're new here). We've all made similar mistakes though. I spent ages uploading pictures of GBC carts to WikiMedia, and it turns out they breach copyright, I misunderstood the rules. Now I come out of it more the wiser and concentrate my efforts in areas where I know the pages/files won't be deleted. It's a learning curve
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: as all fail  for football clubs. However possibly Redirect Nottingham united to their honoury life president's page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)