Deletion of Outsider (comic) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Has some history"?  ''I'' have some history and clearly exist also, but I hardly think that qualifies me for notability.  And Flamrande's argument sounds like an argument for using Wikipedia to promote a webcomic, which is certainly not how it is supposed to work.  I haven't seen any reliable sources of information regarding this web comic.  The webcomiclist and anipike entries are just short synopses with links, which I think falls under the "trivial" category.  So far, doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Note that the  guideline suggests a webcomic may be notable if it "has won a well known and independent award." We could debate whether the Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards are "well known" (I don't think they are) but there doesn't seem to be any debate over the fact that this webcomic has never won
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Well, those articles without external sources fails  and/or .  Unless Abe has turned into a great fat liar for this AFD only, I'm going to go with what he says.  When I say "nothing has changed since the original nomination", I mean that the subject is still non notable.  So you found out about the webcomic because you saw the Wikipedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: does not meet the  guideline or our official content policies, starting with .  Our standards for encyclopedia content are quite higher than any topic that "clearly exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V)

Comment: Pretty decent comic, but unfortunately has not yet reached a level of notabilty acceptable for Wikipedia.  See |Wikipedia:Notability (web content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)