Deletion of List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations (3rd nomination)

Comment: The "arbitrary inclusion" complaint of the nominator is valid as things stand, given the number of unsourced contributions from "drive-by" editors. But, since when is the hope of pre-empting bad editing a reason for deletion? Definitive sources, such as ''The Oxford BBC Guide to Pronunciation'' {{ISBN|9780192807106}} and ''The Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary'' {{ISBN|9780521680882}} are available. Applying the  principle more strictly would be an answer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: again. It's been less than a year since the last nomination, and no new arguments have been brought forward. Most entries can be sourced to published dictionaries (this hasn't been done yet, but it ''could'': the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, Kenyon & Knott, Merriam-Webster Geographical and Biographical Dictionaries, etc., list a lot of these pronunciations), so it's not true that it's "Virtually impossible to source or maintain all entries." And I think we're doing a good job of letting |common sense and talk-page discussion decide what is and what isn't counterintuitive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:common sense)