Deletion of The SNES Game Maker

Comment: spamitycruft (or whatever neothingy you want to make up for it).Article fails , , , and any other number of policies and guidelines. As far as I can tell it doesn't pass a single one. Threats to recreate if deleted means it should be salted. The threatmaker can still recreate in userspace and seek approval for moving to mainspace if a remotely encyclopedic article evolves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:COI)

Comment: WP:CRYSTAL, , . Possibly '''Speedy Delete''' via CSD G4 (Recreation of deleted material) depending how the article was "deleted twice already
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: An ''emerging project'' is rarely notable. There are no |reliable, |verifiable sources listed in the article. No assertion of notability. I found none on the internet. Anyone favoring speedy deletion might want to know it has been speedily deleted twice before. A case could be made for speedy deletion as an advert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)