Deletion of Ausama Monajed

Comment: unless evidence of meeting , ,  presented with  and . The search I did above did not find the sort of coverage needed to meet the burden required for notability. Brief mentions while talking about someone else and a speech, even before the UN, is not sufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: if it will indeed be improved, mainly per . There is a potential set of editors to be scared away if we delete these topics, and WP needs more content from this area of the world. From browsing through the entire Walled garden about the topic (notability of the institution is also under discussion) I get the impression that the person is notable. However, the article doesn't establish that as it currently stands
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)