Deletion of Pascack Pi-oneers

Comment: The additional sources recently added by Noah976 are composed of links to the local school board's website, the US First website, and online forums.  There have now also been several questionably notable facts added.  For instance being "one of the 39 teams" or "Local newspaper coverage was received" or "hosting several teams and generating enthusiasm in the community" does not sound notable regardless of sourcing.  Claims such as "most prestigious award" and "Receiving this award is somewhat rare" and "a relatively young team winning a second Chairmans Award is uncommon" are not supported by reliable sources and sound like non-neutral POV per .  While statements such as, "They have won several other awards" are pointless, and are relying on |original research.  Based upon the stretch of questionable claims, non-neutral point of view, and lack of significant coverage this team just does not seem notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: The team website has http://www.team1676.com/wp/?page_id=286 a page containing archived copies of several news articles written specifically about the team; they seem to be sufficient to satisfy the |notabilty requirement. Also, I'm not keen on a merge to the school district's article. That would seem out of place, I think. It's probably better to have this stand alone, with "See also" links from the schools' articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)