Deletion of Kit Carson Park (Escondido, California)

Comment: Wow! Although I have not thoroughly reviewed each and every entry there are over http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Kit+Carson+Park+%28Escondido%2C+California%29%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Kit+Carson+Park%22+Escondido&oq=%22Kit+Carson+Park%22+Escondido&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3...9147l11701l1l12220l14l12l2l0l0l0l123l992l10j2l16l0.frgbld.&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=386e04cbe857d835&biw=1440&bih=785 5K mentions of the subject of this AfD in news articles, and over http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Kit+Carson+Park+%28Escondido%2C+California%29%22#hl=en&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Kit+Carson+Park%22+Escondido&oq=%22Kit+Carson+Park%22+Escondido&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=serp.3...37538l41117l0l41406l11l11l0l0l0l0l86l861l11l11l0.frgbld.&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=cb461d43581491a1&biw=1440&bih=785 600 mentions of the subject in books. Now I don't know if any of these are singularly "significant" however per : "The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally expected." With these multiple mentions one could argue (and this is my opinion about this particular subject) that all these mentions can add up to significant coverage required by GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)