Deletion of Prince Pedro Luís of Orléans-Braganza

Comment: I concur with nom that this is a very weak claim to notability, that of inheritance () and being one person in a large planecrash (again, notability is not inherited from an event). His own notability as a person seems so slight as not to be worth mentioning. The reason given by DWC LR is "it's obvious" - well it isn't. The reason given by FactStraight is inheritance, which isn't valid. Seems a simple case for deletion to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERIT)

Comment: per  - it's not our job as editors to second-guess the reasons why the sources |note the subjects; newspapers reported about this person, not because he could potentially be emperor in the future but because he was ''currently'' in the succession list (a Line of succession to the former Brazilian throne|notable status by itself, as the genealogies ascertain), so  doesn't apply. The man has been directly covered for reasons other than the crash (see http://veja.abril.com.br/160501/p_086.html), so the  guideline and the  essay don't apply either; he has been noted for at least ''two'' "events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BIO1E||WP:INHERIT)