Deletion of Nate Thomas

Comment: There are a lack of independent sources that cover the Professor Thomas in any depth. Fails , and specifically  as the subject has only been nominated for one Emmy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: The subject is | notable although marginally. He is an academician in media and quoted in various printed articles including previously mentioned by talk here as well as the Los Angeles Daily News http://www.dailynews.com/20090628/all-too-mortal-immortals and San Fernando Valley Business Journal http://www.csun.edu/pubrels/clips/Sept07/09-17-07K.pdf. These publications would not quote the subject if not considered an expert. He won an Emmy Award, the most coveted award in that industry. http://nataspsw.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2014-Recipient-List-for-Website.pdf  |Assuming good faith, I would love to be helpful in rescuing the article vs. immediate deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE||WP:AGF)

Comment: It's marginal whether he meets  as director of East of Hope Street: currently the article on the film is poorly sourced, but according to Rotten Tomatoes it did receive 3 reviews, though they are now offline.http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/east_of_hope_street/reviews/ I don't think he meets  for his professorshiphttp://www.csun.edu/mike-curb-arts-media-communication/cinema-television-arts/nate-thomas. There are brief press mentionshttp://articles.latimes.com/1985-01-22/entertainment/ca-11130_1_black-film and he's occasionally quoted as an experthttp://articles.latimes.com/1995-02-20/local/me-34149_1_star-trek. But it's rather insubstantial
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:SCHOLAR)