Deletion of Words without consonants

Comment: unambiguous , also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: The lack of sources makes this a clear case of .  And while lists like these can be interesting, there's really nothing inherently notable about the information presented in them.  Trivial information just doesn't belong in an encyclopedic setting without a clear cut reason as to its notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Like "words that begin with the letter X," his article's content is more appropriately a category listing at Wiktionary than an article at Wikipedia. There's nothing special about words without consonants or vowels; it's just a random collection of funny words at best. The topic is certainly not  in any way, and presents only .  is a good indicator that just because some might find it strange, interesting, or entertaining doesn't mean it's encyclopedic. Compare the much more clearly academic topic of click consonants. I'm from outer space, but I know OR is not a waivable offense in Wiki County
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NOR)

Comment: This seems like the perfect case for  to waive  as this article's content is useful information (for anyone looking for or interested in words without consonants) and is inherently verifiable.  Besides, there are sources for such information - just because the article does not (yet) cite them is no reason to delete.  What is the harm in keeping it? I see only benefits.  I've requested that Words without vowels be undeleted accordinglyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&action=historysubmit&diff=477458646&oldid=477404125
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:NOR)