Deletion of Hugh F. Blunt

Comment: Worldcat shows he has 2200 library holdings https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-nr2001033581/ here which is significant, he also has been published by major publishers and received several national awards. I don't see this as a memorial as he died in 1957. There are plenty of reviews referenced in the article so there is a clear pass of . The reviews and other references were added on 1 August after the above votes were made,  imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No hard evidence of the same has been presented, anyway.  There is a long list of "additional sources" that aren't reflected in the text of the article, and I take it with a grain of salt, given that there are almost as many as there are ''sentences'' in the article. |WP still isn't a memorial, and there is no evidence the subject meets  either.  (So he purportedly has works still in print. *I* have that much, and I don't qualify for an article either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: as this now appears to pass both GNG and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)