Deletion of World of Warcraft terminology

Comment: as per  a game guide, and the fact that this article is completely unsourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Sorry to buck the tide, but Wikipedia is studded with glossaries, as this article is. I can't see where this is a "game guide," which while people are waving around , is not in fact specifically excluded. By the way, I have a  quote myself:  "Wikipedia also includes glossary pages for various specialized fields."  It's tough to call WoW below the radar for that purpose
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I would urge those suggesting '''Delete''' to be very careful.  Deleting this article gives precedent for putting in AfD for List_of_slang_names_for_poker_hands, Glossary_of_darts, perhaps all of List_of_glossaries#Games; Glossary_of_anatomical_terminology%2C_definitions_and_abbreviations on the basis of being barely more than a list of abbreviations; List_of_terms_associated_with_diabetes, which is almost entirely made of #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|mere internal links; and most certainly List_of_Internet_slang.  Weaker arguments could be made along the same lines for most of List_of_glossaries
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Please check all of the other so called glossaries... if they all indeed violate #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|8 then delete them all... but if a particular entry is 'poorly written' (which, in my eyes, is not...) please change from 'delete' to 'clean up'...  prescedence i think takes priority... if you allow one... you should allow them all... but force them to a higher standard... i think people (including myself) aren't willing to undertake the responsibility to update wiki:not to further identify what wikipedia isn't... either follow the written law, or allow some permeability (akin to esnyder2's comment)... even more precedence can be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Poker_jargon AfD: for Poker Jargon the result of which was the AfD failed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  a dictionary/Gameguide, doesn't WoW have it's own wiki
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)