Deletion of Veridical dream

Comment: Notability established by books: https://books.google.com/books?id=LS0KAQAAMAAJ&q=Veridical+dream&dq=Veridical+dream&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjakdGJhKrMAhXJm4MKHayyCqYQ6AEIUDAJ, https://books.google.com/books?id=hxOfB6wXB4EC&pg=PA256&dq=Veridical+dream&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjakdGJhKrMAhXJm4MKHayyCqYQ6AEIOjAF#v=onepage&q=Veridical%20dream&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=U1zxBwJzKUQC&pg=PA6&dq=Veridical+dream&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjakdGJhKrMAhXJm4MKHayyCqYQ6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q=Veridical%20dream&f=false.  can be fixed as  is also satisfied by these sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: to Oneiromancy - MSJapan has made a good case for deleting this article: it has had a "citation-needed" tag on it's definition for well over a year and no sources have been found that could provide it. There are sources discussing it, so that suggests  to get to the definition used in the article, like MSJapan has mentioned. I tried but could not find a source for that citation either and thus my !vote to remove the content. This leaves the redirect because it is a term in use. I considered Dream_interpretation like suggested by Tigraan but think Oneiromancy is more specific
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)