Deletion of Tyler Ramsey (artist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: realised I didn't actually !vote) - the subject obviously passes  and doesn't need to pass any subsequent secondary criteria. Artists need not pass  if they already pass . Those secondary guidelines exist to allow non-mainstream artists to meet additional art-specific criteria if they don't meet GNG. The subject meets GNG with "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject". For our purposes here, nothing else matters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: The Huffington Post'', ''The Atlantic'', and ''International Business Times'' are among the cited sources. That sure looks like  is satisfied to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think there's a chance the subject ''might'' pass  but the referencing has to be some of the most dishonest I have ever seen in a Wikipedia article. For example, the article suggests his artwork was bought by Ban Ki-Moon, a statement which is sourced to an article about an unrelated subject with a passing mention at the end that ''another'' source had suggested his work had been bought by, "officials at the United Nations". The vast majority of the biggest claims are ''completely'' unsourced and those that are sourced have been sourced to interviews with the subject where he makes various unsourced and unsubstantiated claims to fame. There are some sources that quote whole swathes of other sources but are used to suggest "multiple" instances of coverage. I'm going to try and clean it up but it's really quite atrocious
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)