Deletion of Brazil–Vietnam relations

Comment: The many news articles serve as reliable 3rd party sources which satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: External sources provided clearly cover  and . This one seems pretty clear cut. I know its frustrating with all the international relations stubs created, but look at which one you nominate next time- because this one isn't even close to being a delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: notabile |in the usual way.  I see no argument for this being a highly exception article that needs a highly unusual treatment.http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/759/41/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1104AFFED0B1E918&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-07/11/content_8528603.htmhttp://english.vietnamnet.vn/politics/2006/03/548687/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=121DD03ACD2B9CD0&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://english.vietnamnet.vn/politics/2006/03/547679/http://english.vietnamnet.vn/politics/2006/03/547679/http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/769/41/http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-14513797_ITMhttp://www.highbeam.com/search.aspx?q=Brazil,%20Vietnam%20sign%20agreementhttp://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-14496646_ITMhttp://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-14498632_ITMhttp://english.people.com.cn/200705/30/eng20070530_379243.htmlhttp://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-24829066_ITM and so forth.  Highly notable and encyclopaedic, as we would expect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The Xinhua article and others show that we have reliable third party sources available. Also I don't see how it is Propaganda, it is from a news outlet outside of Vietnam and whether or not it is state run has nothing to do with its facts. So per  I go keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)