Deletion of Lazar Mathew

Comment: Per Agricola's astute analysis. Most of the "keep" !votes are based on a misunderstanding of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The title "director" at the DRDO seems to mean director of one of DRDO's many individual laboratories, i.e. not the head of the entire organization. So this does not rise to the "highest-level position" (head of the entire organization) that would be required by #C6. The reference in the article that claims to source the director title makes this clear: it doesn't actually mention DRDO, but says that he directed INMAS, which is a lab within DRDO
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: To all who !voted "keep", please consider the following findings. (1) Being a fellow of organizations listed in this article does ''not'' have the level of prestige you are assuming. If you examine, for example, the http://www.iabms.org/Application.pdf FABMS fellow application, you find that the eligibility requirements are minimal (must be a society member, must have done "research" for at least 15 years, must have a post-grad degree) and that applicants must pay a fee. Even http://www.unom.ac.in/index.php?route=department/department/profile&deptid=55&facultyid=182 assistant professors seem to be fellows of this society, which implies this "award" is nothing more than a pay-to-play CV puffer. (2) The research record of this individual is not at all consistent with the claims of offices held and awards received. While WoS does show 49 papers, they are not heavily cited: 25, 22, 18, 15, 13, 12, 9, 8 (h-index 8). These figures are characteristic of an average researcher. (3) There seems to be no such position as Chairman of the DRDO. Rather, this organization is administered by the Indian Ministry of Defense and is divided into "establishments" (i.e. laboratories). The subject appears to have been a director of one of these, i.e. a lab head, which, while important, is not notable ''per se''. In summary, much of the claims seem to be , which probably explains Anupmehra's conundrum of not being able to find independent documentation. The subject is clearly a part of the Indian research establishment, but does not seem to meet the WP inclusion guidelines in terms of |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFF||WP:PROF)

Comment: The long list of dubious and poorly-sourced honors makes me suspicious that many of them are made up by the subject (see for instance my earlier comment re the "Academy of Biomedical Scientists", for which most web sources point back to the subject rather than giving any credibility to it as an independent organization. In the face of this sort of apparent self-promotion, even more than the usual case, we need independent sources for |verifiability and as a way of sorting out the truly notable accomplishments (if they exist) from the dross. Without such sources, I think we have to delete this. The one source we have mentions the subject, and appears reliable and independent, but is not sufficient to cover most of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Subject may meet '''|NACADEMIC #3''' criteria for being a fellow of ''Academy of Biomedical Scientists (FABMS); International Medical Sciences Academy (FIMSA)''; and of ''Indian Medical Sciences Academy (FAMS)''. -http://www.psgtech.edu/department/Biomedical/DrLazar_Profile.pdf source. -http://searchindiannews.in/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22Lazar%20Mathew%22&gsc.sort= sources. We may always remove unsourced claims from BLP articles and discuss other questionable stuffs on article's talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:INDAFD)