Deletion of Non-medical use of dextromethorphan

Comment: If the article has problems, this is not a reason for deletion, we can just fix them.  Remove OR, unsourced statements, and text that is too similar to copyrighted text, stub down if necessary.  From #Problem articles where deletion may not be needed: "Article needs improvement | List on Wikipedia:Cleanup". "Article is biased | List on Wikipedia:Pages needing attention".  If all OR and other unsuitable info is removed and there's not even enough left for a stub, it can be redirected to dextromethorphan.  But I find that highly unlikely.  It's an encyclopedic topic; deletion is not required just because the article has problems
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: Article is two years old with a long history. In 2004, the article apparently Talk:Non-medical_use_of_dextromethorphan#Cleanup.|had an alarmist tone, which appears to have been corrected. The pendulum apparently has now swung the other way. However, I don't see inherent problems with the topic itself at all, balance in the article can be brought with some cleanup effort. There seems to be plenty of valuable information on this page still, and since |Wikipedia is not censored, anti-social topics should not be banned as long as the big three content policies (,  and ) are followed. Finally, the merge process does not involve AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:OR)