Deletion of Vehicular violence in the United States

Comment: a clear-cut case of |synthesis. "Violence" is a loaded term to begin with, and the fact that nearly half of this article is about collision, injury, and ownership statistics would seem to imply a link between vehicle ownership and intentional violence, which in addition to being original research sounds like POV-pushing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: but fix lots of issues. What a mess, verging on . What do routine, unintentional traffic accidents have to do with vehicular violence? Delete the Speed, Vehicle ownership, Costs and Vehicle buyback programs sections to begin with. Also remove the statistics in the intro
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: clear  compounded with a misrepresentation of common accidents as "violence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: This is a case of  if I've ever seen one.  The title itself is already problematic, as this is not a widely used or discussed term as far as I can see.  I can only find one real case of it being used, in a university paper that was published in a geographic journal, and even then, the term is exclusively being used to describe cases of vehicular manslaughter, and not any of the other topics covered here.  While each section is sourced, linking these separate things (accidents, drive by shootings, bombings) into one topic by virtue of the fact that they all involve automobiles in some way is ''not'' a conclusion that seems to be supported by actual reliable sources, and was synthesized by the author to create this overall topic.  That goes for the odd sections at the end about the California car buying program as well - there are no sources linking it to the topics covered in the rest of the article, particularly since that program was established to fight air pollution, not "vehicular violence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Did none of these keep!votes even ''read'' my rationale? The examples of so-called "vehicular violence" provided in this article are either not violent at all (e.g. car accidents), utterly irrelevant to the definition brought forward (e.g. car bomb), or redundant (e.g. vehicle-ramming attack). That is the definition of . Also, there seems to be some sort of y anti-automobile slant to this article, what with the focus on vehicle ownership and buyback programs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POINT)