Deletion of Upiq

Comment: subject of article does not appear to have enough significant coverage from independent reliable sources to warrant notability per . Primary editor can wish to userfy article if it is believe that the subject falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The article about Upiq is a well written article about a notable  with a lot of independent references and with lot of links from and to other notable Travel_website#Fare_aggregators_and_metasearch_engines|travel search aggregators on Wikipedia. There is no reason to delete this informative, neutral and well-referenced article.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY)

Comment: fails . The references are mostly the company profile entries in directories, self-published material or otherwise unreliable sources lacking recognition and editorial oversight. Furthermore, this business is |just one of many, indistinguishable among others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:MILL)