Deletion of Indie hip hop

Comment: as a unnecessary content fork of underground hip hop, which has basically the same meaning, and this term is much less used than the underground term. The term in its current use and how it is mentioned in sources is either as underground hip hop or |original research by several blogs which aren't reliable sources. It seems like most of the "keep" voters in the AFD mainly participated because of the bloodbath between Dan56 and Arcandam and didn't do further research on the subject, which is one of AFD main weaknesses, that people who aren't familiar with the subject are mainly the ones who decides if an article gets kept or not. It is easy to decide if the subject/topic meets GNG, but it's usually misinterpreted like in this case, or there's other violations that trumps GNG
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: while such #Music|new genres are habitually deleted, this one appears to be the rare exception, due to the sources that prove notability.  Canvassing does not affect my vote, much as the sins of the priest affects not the Real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, or harmless error by the prosecutor does not mitigate the guilt of the criminal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: as #DICTIONARY.  The article is just a verbose definiton of the title with a list of independent record labels added.  Not a separate, notable genre, just a collection of artists who didn't or couldn't sign with a major label
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)