Deletion of Handbra (2nd nomination)

Comment: When I saw the nomination, I was actually half-expecting the novelty product. Anyway, the term might be real but the article really needs more sources. The Sarah Michelle Gellar picture, for example, has nothing to do with the term. I actually remember the sketch and I don't believe just went back to verify that the term was never used. I also think the article still has a problem with  and therefore it's even more important to place an emphisis on good sources. If those are provided, I'll gladly change my vote to keep though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: unless reliable sources discussing the topic are found before the end of AfD.  No, those two don't qualify—they're passing mentions in op-ed pieces.   is not a valid argument.  Google hits are not a very good argument, and what I'm seeing on Google is A) products named "hand bra" (which is not what this article is talking about), and...blogs.  There may be more in there somewhere, but I didn't find it.  I will happily reconsider if more and better sources turn up—I have no personal convictions one way or the other about this one—but right now, I'm just not seeing it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)