Deletion of Old Chinese Markets

Comment: probably speedy. I can see no merit in the article. Aside from the unreferenced  section upfront about the supposed greed of the Chinese, the article consists of large chunks of text copied ''without attribution'' from other Wikipeda articles: Secret_passage#Appearance_and_construction, Egyptian_Museum#King_Tutankhamun, in breach of the licensing terms. And neither has anything to do with the purported subject of the article anyway; it just seems to be there as ballast
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (:WP:POV)