Deletion of Microsphere projection

Comment: pr. . The article is not written encyclopedical, and the mathematics need some years of work in order to introduce rigor (naturally this requires far more than a Master's thesis), which should be in place before it is possible to write an encyclopedic entry for it. All talk about illumination, microspheres and projection is mostly just wrapping, which probably will not be there if this ever becomes a standard algorithm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Fails  because it does not cite ''independent'' sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: at least until we can get more eyes on this.  It looks like a reasonable article, though it may need to be moved to a better name.  I admit it does look a bit like , but the article looks keepable... until/unless something else surfaces, I'd not want to lose this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY)

Comment: Though this article is properly wikified and well illustrated, it appears to violate  and lacks reliable sources that comment on the method. The comparison of this method against other interpolation methods is not very complete or satisfying, and lacks full descriptions of any of the alternatives
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)