Deletion of Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory controversy

Comment: I don't really care one way or the other about keeping or deleting this article, but I'd like to see some good rationales either way.  JzG/Guy has his facts wrong:  Blanchard's taxonomy, although not the only current idea about how to describe and classify MtF transsexuals, is perhaps the single most widely supported idea among researchers around the world; the fact that (American) trans activists (some of whom are editing these articles) reject it doesn't mean that it has "virtually no currency" (unless you mean to exclude a plurality of experts, in the way that Thabo Mbeki#AIDS|Thabo Mbeki excludes every researcher that thinks HIV causes AIDS as being inherently biased through supporting a causal connection between HIV and AIDS).  To the extent that  requires that we "consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, ''not'' its prevalence among Wikipedia editors," the fact that it is rejected by activists editing Wikipedia is utterly irrelevant.  (See also Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#What_exactly_is_a_FRINGEy_topic.3F|WP:FRINGE on this point.)  Furthermore, this article provides relatively little information about the idea -- it's mostly who said which mean things about whom -- so deleting this article won't significantly reduce encyclopedia-wide coverage of the idea.  Additionally, the closing admin should probably be aware that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE)

Comment: I agree with Dicklyon in that while the article is inherently problematic, certain editors appear to be taking the opportunity to migrate the  and  (accused) material to biographies, which is even worse
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Much of this page is a |POV fork filled with poorly-sourced |BLP violations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK||WP:BLP)