Deletion of List of Thomas & Friends narrow-gauge engines

Comment: The current article is completely unsourced.  Searches using various terms and variations also did not turn up anything substantial about this grouping of characters that would allow this list to pass .  The "Keep" votes above are asserting this article's importance, but none of them have actually shown that reliable, secondary sources exist, which is the most basic tenet of Wikipedia:Verifiability and the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:GNG)

Comment: I recently reduced the article to it's current state. It had sat for more than a decade with no |sources at all, and was full of |unverifiable and severely |biased writing, often from a fan point of view. As it stands the article is well below Wikipedia's thresholds for quality, notability and verifiability. If no sources have been added in the 13 years since the article was created, I think there is no likelihood that it will ever be sourced or reach the necessary quality to be included
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NPOV)

Comment: More fancruft that does not meet , , or have  addressing the subject directly and in depth. Very similar to the deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thomas & Friends rolling stock. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:CLN||WP:SIGCOV)