Deletion of Mike Randall

Comment: appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: there is nothing in the article that suggests notability. If he falls under some criterion from  - for example, having written for a magazine with a circulation of at least 5,000 - then evidence for this needs to be clearly documented here. If this will be the case, I will change my vote. Until then, we've got a person who does not sound like he has done anything significant enough to be considered notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Edits two magazines with circulation > 5,000 and thus satisfies .  The LBU stuff doesn't reflect well on him as a person, but doesn't really matter one way or the other for bio standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)