Deletion of List of fictional super metals

Comment: per DGG, Jclemens, , and .  DGG's and Jclemens' comments seem common sense to me.  Many lists have been deleted or merged in the past; the ones that are merged tend to be sub-lists or more obscure.  Deleting such a list will eliminate its history and sourcing, but merger would save those
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:CHEAP)

Comment: per nom.  No need to have two lists, no need to have unsourced information, but note that per , sourcing that meets , including primary sourcing, is sufficient to keep an individual list entry
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NNC||WP:V)

Comment: Almost completely unsourceable per , and is potentially infinite, since the list's criteria for inclusion are extraordinarily broad. Individual elements of the list are almost all . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)