Deletion of Notre Dame High School (Calgary)

Comment: we NEVER delete high school articles on the basis of notability, because through an exhaustive series of attempts at doing so, over a very long period of time, EVERY high school inevitably is found to easily meet the primary retention criterial of .  High schools are the sort of a central institution within a community that inherantly generates news, and as such through a sufficient search of archives can be shown to be notable.  It is a matter of conveneience to preassume them to be notable to avoid unnecessary deletion discussions that NEVER result in deletion.  There is ample precedent to summarily dismiss deletion nominations for high schools; hence the basis for the draft guidance in chool, which although not ''de jure'' in force, it is certainly ''de facto'' in force. So: keep per chool
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:S)

Comment: I just added two sources that meet all the requirements of  and . Technicallly: the two sources (news articles) obviously include substantial coverage, and they are used in the WP article to cite information, but not much. I didn't pay to go behind the Calgary Sun's subscription wall to actually read them (the information provided at the website's search results page gave me the information). The purpose of the notability guidelines is to insure that the subject is notable enough, and these two footnotes prove that it is, so adding these kinds of footnotes doesn't seem to be |wikilawyering (evading the actual spirit of the guidelines). Of course, the article remains lousy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SCHOOL||WP:WIKILAWYER)