Deletion of Girther movement

Comment: This might be the epitome of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: silly |news story
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and common sense. Chris Hayes coined a term on his show and we make a page about it? Really? Do the people saying "keep" not see how inappropriate this is? Even if there are enough sources to make a GNG argument, which I don't think there are,  and keep this trash to the left wing blogs. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:IAR)

Comment: As ludicrous as it sounds, this article is backed up by a number of reliable sources and ''easily'' passes the |General Notability Guidelines. I think it is a stupid article about a stupid thing, and it makes me want to bash my head on the desk, but it satisfies notability criteria and this is the world we now live in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: seriously? This is mostly based on two tweets from today. ,  certainly apply here. While I would support including content regarding Trump's health and speculations on it in his article (or the Presidency subarticle), the "Girther" movement does not warrant its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)