Deletion of Steve Gatena (3rd nomination)

Comment: Probably the most neutral autobiography I've ever seen on Wikipedia, but just below the bar of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Likely passes thlete... ''If'' he has indeed played for USC, which is a Division I team "the highest amateur level" for American football. Some have argued college players don't meet TH if there is a professional level for the same sport. That is nonsense, and reading into TH what isn't there. thlete says: ''"People who have competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships."'' As for the number of players who meet this criterion: Who cares? Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia and '''there almost 3 million articles right now'''. Even if there were 100,000 college sports player articles, that would only be about three percent of all current articles. This nomination is about this player only, not any number of other players. It isn't about successfully walking on or not, either. The line of inclusion is game action. Has he, or has he not, seen action in an NCAA Division I game
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Fails  - I've outlined the reasons in Talk:Steve Gatena, but to summarize, the Steve Gatena has not been a subject of significant coverage in multiple, third party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails  and just about every other aspect of |notability i can think of. I recently participated in an AfD for a mexican soccer player who was on the junior national side and a full pro, but had not made an appearance as a senior pro. The  guidleine made it a clear delete. Now we have an amateur athlete who isn't good enough to get on the field in a competitive match for an amateur team? Another clear delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:NOTE||WP:ATHLETE)