Deletion of John Evans (supercentenarian)

Comment: per  and . Longevity is not a contest as this heavily padded article tries to claim and there is no article when you remove the padding about records, other individuals, and the standard longevity secret. There is also no policy or guideline that the "oldest X" is notable, and even GWR didn't find this so called achievement worth continuing to note for a 10 year period after he died
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . There is no article here. It's just longevity trivia about his predecessors/successors, oldest to get a pacemaker, etc. Entry in a list is enough. And what is one meant to make of this sentence: "Guinness World Records had recognised Evans as the "world's oldest man" in 1989, but let the title lapse after his death, only to bring it back in 2000
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB)

Comment: per the utter lack of secondary sources, , and the usual problems with similar attempts at articles. And, to boot, language in the article reads like a failed attempt to make it seem like getting super old is some kind of sport
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)