Deletion of Bibliography of encyclopedias

Comment: per Ipigott's comments.  "List of ___" articles basically should include only items that (1) have Wikipedia articles, or (2) can be expected to get them.  This page has a completely different purpose of listing basically any and every encyclopedia — while the pages linked at List of encyclopedias provide links to articles about those encyclopedias, this list provides links to the encyclopedias themselves and to bibliographic information (e.g. ISBNs) about them.  Basic lists are one situation in which "|it's useful" really is a good argument; this list brings together related encyclopedia topics and is useful for navigating that subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: The only basis for deletion provided above seems to relate specifically to the admittedly over-exuberant language in the lede section, and it should be noted that I had expressed those concerns in the talk page already. I acknowledge that there is a duplication question regarding the two groups of articles, but, honestly, to my eyes the title with the work "Bibliography" is a bit clearer and possibly better in line with  than the more generic title "List" articles. Personally, I think it more reasonable to merge the content from the existing "List" articles into the bibliography articles, which, again, seem to me to have a more appropriate name. I have only gone through about 1/4 of the 1986 Sheehy book I am currently using to cite my own additions to the pages, which also, obviously, only covers books printed in 1986 or early, but I have started a similar list specifically for religion at
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NAME)