Deletion of Luca de Alfaro

Comment: de Alfaro has done some amazing things and his work seems very interesting to me (as a computer scientist).  However, to be included in an encyclopedia (and per our |guidelines), there needs to be more.  There are millions of professors that have produced interesting papers, but only a few of them pass .  Please try not too put any extra weight on his Wikipedia papers.  '''~a
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I want to be very sure of what  says about associate professors before I commit myself but, in the interim, I am troubled by my examination of the 13 references cited.  The first three are legitimate publications and the remainder seem to be either blogs or his own university.  That's in addition to the  problems inherent in what I strongly suspect is a self-written article -- university publications about the merits of their own faculty are inherently biased, I feel.  I'm also troubled by the forward-looking nature of the notability asserted by the possible future implementation of the software (especially since one of the references cites problems with its implementation in the German Wikipedia) -- seems to have problems with #CRYSTAL.  I want to research  more thoroughly before I commit myself; that may be the deciding factor for me. I admit it is also rather bizarre to consider the potential untrustworthiness of an article about someone who has apparently created software that will allow people to test the trustworthiness of editors
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:COI||WP:NOT||WP:BIO)

Comment: Clarly fails the stanbdard asserted at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)