Deletion of Ghib Ojisan

Comment: Notability is judged by significant coverage by multiple RSes, not by subscriber count. The multitude of sources used in the article demonstrate that  is met. The use of self-published sources found in the article are appropriate per . There are concerns about excessive detail which IMO are valid, but those are grounds for trimming, not deletion. ~&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ABOUTSELF)

Comment: as per the multiple reliable sources significant coverage identified above by Cunard that shows enough for a pass of  so that deletion is unnecessary in my view. Issue of over-detail can be discussed on the article talk page as there is disagreement on the matter,imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Ekuftle, your account was created on 6 June 2021. Your creation of this AfD nomination is your first edit to Wikipedia namespace. You expressed deep familiarity with Wikipedia policies and guidelines by citing , , and . Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts says: "Undisclosed alternative accounts generally may not be used in discussions internal to the project outside of limited circumstance." Have you edited Wikipedia with another account before
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPIP||WP:SBST)