Deletion of 2019 Prince Philip road accident

Comment: In addition to the  concerns, I also think the article violates , given that this is a minor incident which has been blown up by a few media outlets (and yes, other media around the world has also reported on it, but those are short notices - there is no lasting impact shown). I removed a tabloid/gossip magazine style section but part of that content, which I still think violates BLP, was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2019_Prince_Philip_road_accident&diff=880161053&oldid=880160815 almost immediately restored. Any relevant and encyclopedic content can go in the article about Prince Philip; there is not enough such content about the incident to have a separate article about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP)

Comment: I've tried to be tolerant here, but there are obvious problems with  and . Not everything in the news warrants a separate article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per . There can clearly be a mention of this in the article on Prince Philip, but the incident itself is just an ordinary road traffic accident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per , and , this does not have enduring historical significance. Already sufficiently covered in Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT)