Deletion of Mulla Hamzah Gilani

Comment: Totally unintentionally, I suspect, the nominator has failed to  on the part of the article's creator, who to me seems probably sincere but needs to learn more about creating and editing Wikipedia articles. The references in the article are almost certainly not faked, but malformed because the article creator has used the wrong template. The article creator has then compounded his problems by mostly using Hijri years rather than standard CE dates. The book which the first reference (with the only CE date in the entire article) is intended to point to happens to be listed at the bottom of the article - it is almost certainly https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cMIYAAAAIAAJ this work (though probably the fourth and last volume, for which I can not find a link, rather than the linked third volume). The other references simply have too little information to be identifiable, though the third link seems to be intended to refer to some work published in the mid-1980s that was in turn referring to Hazin Lahiji, and the fifth to a posthumous edition of something by Agha Bozorg Tehrani. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find any accessible online coverage (beyond mentions in indexes) of this Iranian scholar of about 300 years ago - so unless the article creator comes back and either repairs his citations or lists his references fully enough, either here or at the article talk page, for others to check, we have no way of telling whether reliable sources cover him in enough detail to make him notable, or do little more than mention his name
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)