Deletion of Nuclear

Comment: Since "Nuclear" is an adjective, it is always used in conjunction with a noun; therefore none of the articles should be known simply as "nuclear". Per , disambiguations exist to help one find the page they are looking for when multiple articles are known by the same term. None of these articles are known by simply as "nuclear" so it violates the purpose of a disambiguation and should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DAB)

Comment: Clearly there are not even two articles listed that are ambiguous.  The page is not actually a disambgiguation page at all but merely a list of articles  contain nuclear or even related words from the same root. (This is one of most off-base disambiguation pages I have ever seen.) See . —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DISAMBIG)

Comment: essentially in the spirit of . I'm looking at this from the reader's perspective: someone searching for "nuclear" is probably looking for nuclear physics, nuclear power, or nuclear weapon, not nucleus. Since none of those terms could plausibly be put on the nucleus disambiguation page, I dislike redirecting to there. Yes, I'm well aware that this page violates MOSDAB, but in my opinion it's justified in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)