Deletion of Webe Kadima

Comment: I'd agree with that. Also she has enough coverage generally to just meet . Her ''Dictionary of African Biography'' entry is especially persuasive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The citation record is not yet strong enough to make a convincing case for #C1, the Oswegonian piece is entirely composed of quotes from a press release by her employer, and the Mwakilishi.com article (mirrored elsewhere) mentions her only in passing. And the arguments made above about how she has made scientific discoveries and been funded by grants are pointless: all academics in the sciences do that, and I don't think we want to argue that all are notable. The standard in sports of including anyone who walks onto the field in a professional game should be fixed, not emulated. But I think the "Dictionary of African Biography" entry linked above does count strongly for notability (even though it seems not to be linked in the actual article). Although the Post-Standard article is too local to count for  notability by itself, it is reliable and independent of the subject, and I think it can be combined with the DAB source to provide the multiple in-depth reliable independent sources required by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: based on a couple of things. The "Dictionary of African Biography" entry, stating that she created a non-profit, in addition to the citations she has received https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?hl=en&q=Webe+Kadima&btnG= make me believe that she ''just barely'' passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per . I'm looking holistically. FWIW, I graduated from SUNY New Paltz
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE)