Deletion of Naturalistic pantheism

Comment: that seems to be a lot of  material; plenty for inclusion.  It's also unclear under which policy you're suggesting deletion?  The article doesn't seem to be 'promoting' anything and by your logic of not including anything 'without any other backing but a single person's preference and his organization', I supposed we'd have to remove all articles about Calvinism too, as that's just 'one persons preferences'.  If the phrase in question here has other, older uses, then they should be |sourced and included in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: The nomination well demonstrates the notability of the topic.  The balance of the article is not a reason to delete as this may be addressed by ordinary editing per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)