Deletion of French Twist (Gilmore Girls)

Comment: I agree with Cburnett, this nom is trying to make a point. Much work can (and needs to be) done in order to improve the articles, but it's not a reason they should be deleted. Also, can't see any vioation of , hence my vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE)

Comment: Episode articles should not be a default, and I seriously doubt any episode from this show has individual notable impact on the real world (maybe the series as a whole, but not on an episode-by-episode basis). I don't know what the nom's motivation is, but this is clearly a violation of #IINFO, that much is true
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This AFD is |trying to make a point, at best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: These articles need expansion and clean-up, but I fail to see why these articles should have less right to exist on Wikipedia than the hundreds of individual episode articles already in place for other series. The nom's rationale would pretty well disqualify 99% of episode articles, in which case I recommend the nominator make a policy change suggestion rather than singling out one show. The consenus at  doesn't appear to have been violated, though the articles can be improved, of course
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE)