Deletion of Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth

Comment: as |non-notable Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement|Vanispamcruftisement, and smacks strongly of an attempt to promote the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:TRUTH)

Comment: Lack of notability and |reliable sources out there to merit an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: As per , we need independent sources to warrant inclusion of an organization like this. Fringe groups are out there, but this one isn't notable enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: to 9/11 Truth Movement . Just not enough sources satisfying  to justify a stand-alone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: or '''Merge''' into the article Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center.  Lack of notability and |reliable sources out there to merit an article, there is already a link to the organization on the Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center page and they are mainly concerned with the collapse of the buildings, from the "about us" section on their website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as |unverifiable unless reliable third-party sources can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: as /.  ''Self proclaimed ... professionals'' is a contradiction in terms
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:NONSENSE)