Deletion of Eternal Divinity

Comment: per |SNOW; I can think of various speedy deletion categories (like no claims of notability, and, yes, nonsense a "religious" article quoting the Sopranos?) but I see from the edit history that these tags have been repeatedly removed. Still, there's not a chance that this article will ever be coherent or notable.  I can't even think of any other content that might be headed under this title that isn't already covered in other, better, entries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: This is not nonsense per se, but obviously original research and #SOAP|soapboxing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: for A1, supported by .  I don't believe this qualifies as |nonsense, as it appears to be a "Religious Excogitation."  I'm assuming the good faith of the author, but I still think  applies as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NONSENSE||WP:SNOW)