Deletion of Roblox (2nd nomination)

Comment: I will also note that as this article has fairly high traffic (being accessed http://stats.grok.se/en/201002/Roblox 10548 times in February we will probably end up with many |Single purpose accounts voicing an opinion here, as roblox users will see the page and come here more than likely screaming for keep. Not a desirable thing, maybe we could semi-protect the discussion if that begins to happen. In the time that this article has been in the mainspace I've learned that it is a strange topic, as when you go to look for sources the results you get in google are misleading. Most of the hits that come up are from the roblox site, or are roblox fan forums
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:WEB)

Comment: full of |primary sources, with only a few third-party sources.  Those sources are either |not reliable or do not provide |significant coverage on the topic.  Also, please note the http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=22149778 off site canvassing occurring
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:RS||WP:N)