Deletion of FCCJ (Jacksonville Skyway)

Comment: per , stations are inherently notable by precedent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: per long standing precedent and , such stations are notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: with JTA Skyway. (I was the one who merged them after seeing them prod-ed). I agree with that  usually calls for keeping these as separate articles, but I think that it is more useful and easier for the reader to keep what information is here in the main article. All the eight articles are stubs, and the information can be reasonably added to the JTA Skyway article without bloating that article to unreasonable lengths. I don't view this as a question of deleting/including the info about these stations, but as a matter of how best to present it. In general, unless the article has become too long, keeping things in one article is easier. One can print out one (slightly) longer article instead of several small ones, and one does not need to click through a myriad of links in order to read it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)