Deletion of 1978–79 London Spartan League

Comment: Subject doesn't pass  and  (in reply to the above discussion about inaccessible texts, I think that's it's more likely than not that they are based on not more than {{tq|routine coverage of each game}}; I disagree that there's a general onus on the keep !voters to produce evidence of significant coverage, but there as onus on the side that claims a concrete example of coverage is significant, to back that assertion up with something, so that it isn't completely speculative). I disagree with the procedural critique outlined by {{u|Number 57}}. When there is a lack of a specific procedure, the more general procedure that is in effect needs to be used, it's a robust, transparent, and inclusive way of doing things. And if the results are a little unsatisfactory for the time being, that just means that we know ''why'' a new tool of process needs to be made, but discussions can't be based on this speculative future tool, in anticipation. Individual AfDs are more than fine. Edit: those who !vote delete based on their perceived need for a centralized discussion simply need to start that centralized discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: Fails . We can’t evaluate sources that are not produced, and lack of evidence is simply that, lack of evidence. It’s on the onus of the keep voters to provide evidence of significant coverage, and speculations on existing sources is not convincing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)