Deletion of Cultural impact of Beyoncé

Comment: per  and TheTechnician27
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: and redirect title to the main art.) — At least by now, keeping the article requires attention and a lot of time to verify quality of sources among many other things which could lead to create WP:FANCRUFT. In addition,  is the most important (and worried) point here and that's technically a problem with the whole text of this entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK)

Comment: I must have looked at this article 18 times. I explain. Any article that examines the cultural or ethnographic effect of a single person on a particular culture and in a particular environment, needs to be an academic article, that examines the assertions in the detail and provide them with academic sources. So the whole article is . Let's examine a couple of single instances
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: or '''redirect''' to Beyonce)--this is |undue and can be reasonably incorporated into the Beyonce article without straying into excessive details. I even think "Cultural impact of artist" articles should not exist in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)