Deletion of Chase Technology Consultants

Comment: I have added a reference to a book which uses the firm as a case study (found via Google Books search). In addition the article already has a range of references: I don't find the Wall St Journal one very impressive (a passing quote), but the others are more substantially about the firm, albeit all in its home area of Boston. The question is whether these demonstrate  coverage of more than a firm simply going about its business, but actually meeting ; I am just tipping to the positive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails  for lack of significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Specifically: it gets mentioned in passing, or its CEO gets quoted, in a few major-publication articles; not enough. There are a couple of articles specifically about the company, from the Boston area business journal; but coverage in the local business paper does not suggest that the company has significant impact anywhere else. As noted above, it is unlikely that a purely local IT staffing and recruitment firm is ever going to get the kind of notability needed for inclusion here. It certainly doesn't have it now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: It isn't a matter of counting sources; it's a matter of what the sources '''''say''''' about this business.  Specifically, do the sources say that this business has done anything with the kind of |significant effects on history, technology, or culture, of such Notability in Wikipedia|durable importance that it should be |remembered in an encyclopedia?  I don't see that now, and don't see that likely; it's ''a staffing and recruitment firm'', the sort of business that probably will never become an encyclopedia subject simply by plying its trade
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:N)