Deletion of The Chinese in Mexico

Comment: as per Hegvald. They are not casual reviews either,  definitely covered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: meets  and , in addition to the book reviews cited, here are a coupe more: in ''China Review International'' - https://muse.jhu.edu/article/607940 ''The Chinese in Mexico 1882–1940 by Robert Chao Romero, and: Making the Chinese Mexican: Global Migration, Localism, and Exclusions in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands by Grace Peña Delgado, and: Chinese Mexicans: Transpacific Migration and the Search for a Homeland 1910–1960 by Julia María Schiavone Camacho (review)'', and in ''Bulletin of Latin American Research'' - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/blar.12198 ''Book Review: The Chinese in Mexico, 1882–1940 ‐ by Chao Romero, Robert'', and its pretty well known being https://www.worldcat.org/title/chinese-in-mexico-1882-1940/oclc/781275373&referer=brief_results held by around 520 libraries around the world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly fits 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: The reference section includes five reviews of this book. Personally, I would prefer content on this type to be given more context by being included in a larger historical article on Chinese in Mexico, a larger historiographical article on the study of the Chinese in Mexico, or in a biography of the author, Robert Chao Romero, who has no article but who may well have published other things on the same subject or related subjects. Possibly all three. But, failing either of those things, this fulfills criterion #1 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: The article clearly satisfies criteria 1. of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NB)