Deletion of Patrick.net

Comment: as the site as stated above does not meet . Also a good dose of |salt might be healthy too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:SALT)

Comment: Not notable. Fails , I don't think those sources are enough, and, as Barek said, they better define the founder. (And cue the |SPA's with their "keep" !votes that don't say why the subject is notable, and the trolls from the website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPA)

Comment: I looked through the WP List of Internet forums to get a sense of what qualifies as notable, and how the question is usually addressed.  For example, Patrick.net has more than twice as many registered user accounts as Urdu Mehfil, and the Patrick.net article cites significant coverage in multiple , compared to zero  references in Urdu Mehfil.  The Urdu Mehfil article was flagged for notability in January 2015, but remains on WP.  It's fine with me to see an article on Urdu Mehfil, and I'm not suggesting deleting it.  However, may I please suggest some sort of timeline or sequence to address notability, rather than hastily deleting and salting before editors can even address the issue?  I don't understand the rush to delete this particular article, when others have more than a year to address notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: UPDATE: Despite a busy Labor Day weekend, I have added several quotations from clearly notable and independent  reporting on the subject site.  The article links now to 10 different examples, including authors and interviewers who are notable in themselves as described in WP articles of their own, linking thus to a dozen different WP articles.  The linked  include ''The Wall Street Journal'' article excerpted above, which devoted more than 500 words specifically to Patrick.net and the people and events behind it, as well as other substantive coverage and interviews spanning a decade and with a combined audience of more than 20 million people.  Any editors who voted to delete prior to these additions, please reconsider now that notability is established
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)