Deletion of Mego Sonny & Cher Toys

Comment: you've done nothing about the hieroglyph.net citations which both appear to be an unreliable-source & broken-links. Also, I would suggest that the amount of material cited to Mego's megomuseum.com is excessive -- a predomience of -sourced  material is needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: I have no personal interest in this type of "collectible".  However, a Google search for "Sonny & Cher" dolls +Mego shows coverage by the Chicago Tribune in 1976 and in a number of antiques and collectibles books.  Although these dolls may be little known in 2011, they were notable enough in 1976 that Bob Mackie designed the costumes.  This isn't an encylopedia of things in the 21st century, it is an encyclopedia of things that remain notable after decades, centuries and millenia, because notability is |not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: a nine-source 'refspam' for the simple fact that , plus a whole swathe of citations to fansites (megomuseum.com, cherscholar.com, hieroglyph.net) ''does not'' amount to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". No indication on Google News/Books of reliable sources that "address the subject directly in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: The facts don't seem in dispute here and the worst case is that we'd merge with Sonny & Cher or Mego Corporation.  Per our |editing policy, there's no case for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)