Deletion of Gone with the Blastwave

Comment: for failing the |notability guidelines for |web-based material. The article does not cite multiple, non-trivial, |reliable sources indicating notability. In addition the lack of accessible third-party sources makes the article |unverifiable. In response to Darkcraft on the point of other articles being in the 'pedia, |inclusion is not an indicator of notability, nor is the |Pokemon defense a strong argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WEB||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:INN||WP:POKEMON)

Comment: still no reliable sources added to the article, little assertion of notability,  is important and  is non-negotiable. Being about to be published - #CRYSTAL - is not an indicator of notability - plenty of books that sold 1 copy have been published. Well, a bit more than 1, but you get the point. I have struck "and salt" as it seems as though there is an argument that this should be deleted without prejudice against further recreation, if and when this becomes notable and gets multiple non-trivial references to it from multiple reputable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOT)