Deletion of List of largest towns in England without a railway station

Comment: per nom and MilborneOne.  Also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per . The category is non notable and neither is the list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: One more source to look at https://www.citymetric.com/transport/which-parts-great-britain-are-furthest-train-station-3165 "Which parts of Great Britain are furthest from a train station?" to establish notability. Ok, CityMetric is not a peer reviewed scientific journal, but it is part of the ''New Statesman'', so still a reliable source in Wikipedia terms. Even if it wasn't, the author, https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=1_voj0kAAAAJ&hl=en Alasdair Rae, would get a pass per  as a professor at Sheffield University who is previously published in the field.  The last word, I think, needs to go to a reply to a "Notes & Queries" piece in ''The Guardian'', https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-2754,00.html "Which is the largest town in Britain that cannot be reached by train? LONDON, probably, if you're travelling by Virgin
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS)

Comment: does not meet , where are the |sources that discuss such towns as a group? inclusion criteria is also ill defined/arbitrary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:RS)