Deletion of 10 dimensions

Comment: there's no need for a redirect here.  We don't redirect "7 Trees", "12 Trees" and "37 Trees" to the article on "Trees."  This is complete , and if there weren't already "Redirect" votes present, I'd recommend for speedy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: that is almost |speedy-grade material. Comparing that unintelligible essay with the original source makes it clear that the meaning has been lost. There would be a case for redirection if, and only if, "10 dimensions" was a common term for something in the context of string theory which meant more than the plain meaning ("5+5 coordinates of spacetime"). Needless to say, I do not see that. The mere fact that the article tries to deal with String theory#Number of dimensions is irrelevant (if Lizards from outer space is created with the claim Barack Obama is one of them, we would not redirect the former to the latter at AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G1)

Comment: to String theory#Number of dimensions per {{U|Mark viking}}.  As written this is unencyclopedic, unsourced, largely unintelligible |original research
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The article needs work, not deleting. If you look up 10 dimensions, there's lots of sources about it. See http://phys.org/news/2014-12-universe-dimensions.html, http://ultraculture.org/blog/2014/12/16/heres-visual-guide-10-dimensions-reality/, http://www.universetoday.com/48619/a-universe-of-10-dimensions/, http://www.brainpickings.org/2012/01/25/imagining-the-tenth-dimension/, https://plus.maths.org/content/10-dimensions-and-more-string-theory, http://www.columbia.edu/cu/record/23/18/14.html. Therefore, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)