Deletion of Shitfaced Clowns

Comment: We keep articles based on their |significant coverage in multiple |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) This article has none. As for its importance, no one's saying it isn't—we just don't have any more coverage than a single link to substantiate a full article without falling back on |original and uncited research (which WP does not host). There are better wikis for this information, just |not Wikipedia. Now perhaps it's worth a mention on a related demoscene page, cited to a reliable niche source as important for the period, but "Shitfaced Clowns" as a topic of an article will only continue to collect unsourced or unverifiable information until someone can show that there is a stack of Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources waiting to be used. No suitable redirect targets. czar&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:OR||WP:WWIN)

Comment: fails  and . The concept is notable, but that doesn't mean all participating groups are notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:GNG)