Deletion of Neon Genesis Evangelion timeline (2nd nomination)

Comment: Almost entirely plot points, which is a violation of , with no secondary information. There is clearly a level of |original research going on as well. The fictional timeline also does not contribute to the understanding of the series and is only interesting to a small population of enthusiastic fans. The '''actual''' timeline of the series can be better expressed in the preexisting episode and chapter lists and not in this construct that is a text book example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT||WP:NOR||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: as redundant to main article. It's a content fork that takes the parts of the series WITHOUT real world notability and tries to turn it into an article. We only have articles on topics where we can , and no one has been able to verify the notability of this timeline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:verify notability)

Comment: per Jfsglo's and Bread Ninja's reasonings. This article seriously has |fancruft issues and furthermore, it fails the |general notability guideline. Darth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly violates  and , not to mention 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:OR||WP:N)