Deletion of Thomas Otter

Comment: No'' sources?  I see, at minimum, a list of his publications, and a link to his department.  I am sceptical about whether marketing is properly an academic study, and there seems to be a bit of meaningless, |spammy prose in the article:''The chair of Service Marketing supports marketing decisions. Motivated by practical problems we first develop candidate solutions using manager´s insight and marketing theory. The best solution is then identified through model based analysis of data supplied by companies and other sources. The best solution maximizes the expected improvement relative to the status quo.''I'd also question whether this particular academic is |notable.  But the stated grounds for deleting this article seem not to be sustained by the text I saw on the page.  In any case, |there is no deadline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:BIO||WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: I agree with Crusio's assessment. A good relatively junior academic who does not appear to pass  for the moment. PhD is 2001, according to his CVhttp://www.marketing.uni-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/user_upload/MARKETING_Otter/CVOtter.pdf, was an Assistant Professor until 2007. No significant post-dissertation awards or honors mentioned in the CV. A good publication record but nothing out of the ordinary. GoogleScholar gives top citation hit of 11 followed by several single digits.http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&num=10&as_epq=Thomas+Otter&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_brr=0&lr=&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_sub=&as_drrb=c&as_miny=2000&as_maxy=2008&as_isbn=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws&q=%22Thomas%20Otter%22. No other indicators to show satisfying  that I could find
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)