Deletion of Live Prayer

Comment: While I may personally object to the ''subject'' of the article, it is |not relevant for an AFD discussion.  The notability is quite well-documented with plenty of independent sources.  The tone does seem suspiciously on the positive side, but it is not uncommon for articles to be written by the proponents of the subject.  It is certainly not a criterion for deletion.  My only real problem with the ''article'' is the numerous inline links to specific sections of the website, which seem sort of "spammy" and they really aren't encyclopedic.  Furthermore, it is not uncommon for these kinds of links to go stale over time.  Much better to just keep a single external link to the website and let anyone who is interested navigate to the relevant page.  I'll see if I can clean it up somewhat
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)