Deletion of Zachariah Eastin

Comment: Yes,  is the shortcut to the same content. However, it doesn't state that general rank officers ''should be included'' {or that the rank indicates notability). It says that if there is a rank of general, then there will almost always have sufficient coverage. It also goes on to say that a "person who is only mentioned in genealogical records or family histories, or is traceable only through primary documents, ''is not notable''". In this case, threshold for meeting the GNG has not been met, due to the lack of significant reliable and independent sources. All the sources offered are mere genealogical, family narratives
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: Passes  as a flag rank officer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: Doesn't matter what command he held or didn't hold. Brigadier-general is sufficient for inclusion per , a widely-accepted standard for military biographical articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)