Deletion of Horton Gallery (2nd nomination)

Comment: While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horton Gallery|previously discussed at AfD and the result was delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: The article has been refbombed, the list of references is currently larger than the text of the article, most of which are not relevant to the criteria for establishing notability. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria, either relying on coverage of exhibitions or artists (failing CORPDEPTH), mentions in passing or Primary and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)