Deletion of Organizations of The Elder Scrolls (3rd nomination)

Comment: While I think there are sufficient sources for there to be an article under GNG but I'm not sure it completely fulfills 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: I find the decision to relist this discussion as a bit perplexing. Especially since the consensus prior to the first relist was very strong, and following the relist, it still largely favoured delete in that the 9 editors who argued for delete cited guideline and policy based arguments, while the 1 keep argument has not addressed  or that the article makes no assertion of notability, and largely agreed, the article does not discussion the important aspects of the feature outside guide
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)

Comment: I'm a huge fan of the series, and Morrowind even changed my life, but as the above posters note this article has no real-world basis.  It's all in-universe and of little importance outside of the Elder Scrolls franchise. It's a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)

Comment: Definitely within |fancruft. Most of the sources point towards aspects of the game not directly relating to the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FAN)

Comment: Factions and guilds in the Elder Scrolls games have gotten some news press at http://www.ign.com/wikis/elder-scrolls-online/Factions IGN, http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/game/821/feature/7039/Asymmetrical-Factions.html mmprorg.com, http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/06/05/first-look-at-elder-scrolls-onlines-three-factions-in-new-trailer/ PC Gamer, and http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/718481/the-elder-scrolls-5-skyrim-factions-and-guilds-guide/ G4. None of these could be considered unambiguously reliable sources, but the topic may become notable in time. In my opinion,  is an argument for improving the article, not deletion. I agree that consensus for deletion was reached and will not contest that, but there should be no prejudice to re-creation if more sources become available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)