Deletion of Jim DeBerry

Comment: Pending further review of the sources, which should decide this pretty effectively, I'll note at this point that the article definitely needs a cleanup to remove all hints of bias, non-neutral |POV, and |promotional tone. I personally wouldn't have cleared this through AFC in its current state for those reasons, having not looked at the sourcing yet. I'll also suggest to the article's author
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:PROMO)