Deletion of List of Naga surnames

Comment: I'm with {{u|Spiderone}}'s comment at 14:35 above and note that  etc are just guidelines, not policies. Anyone can call themselves anything, and it is unlikely that any list of surnames supposedly of one particular group are in fact exclusive to that group. In some situations, it can give rise to BLP violations also (a common issue with surname articles - not lists, but like Topsy, these things tend to grow). Anyone who has spent a bit of time digging around even supposed top-notch references works such as the Oxford family names dictionaries will know that they are inconsistent even within themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: changed vote): I was reading this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French surnames|discussion {{u|Spiderone}} posted on a similar discussion and the mention of "List of Jewish names" startled me. I actually can't believe it didn't occur to me immediately what various ''lists of names'' that usually to belong to a ''particular group'' have been used for historically. This may not have occured to others as well. '''I know this was absolutely not in anyway the intention with these Wikipedia lists''', but good intentions can be used by those with other than good intentions. This is enough for me to switch to Delete. I doubt there is a policy or guideline to directly support this reasoning, but per  I think Delete is the best way to improve the encyclopedia. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNORE)