Deletion of Andscacs

Comment: The only source that might meet the requirements of  (and I have my doubts when it comes to the "independent of the subject" requirement – it sounds like a press release rather than original reporting) is http://www.chessdom.com/andscacs-the-3150-elo-computer-chess-engine-from-andorra/ ref. 3. Given that "multiple sources are generally expected" by GNG, that's not enough. Noncommercial, closed-source engines without notable competitive results are not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)