Deletion of Rob McEwen (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article definitely needs sourcing repair and a cleanup for , but there are credible notability claims — including being appointed to the Order of Canada, which is always valid grounds for an article in and of itself so long as there's some genuine substance and sourcing provided for what they did to get there. Then there's the philanthropy thing — which admittedly this article misses as written, but our article on the McEwen School of Architecture will make clearer. Article needs work, yes, but the base notability is there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)