Deletion of Pghbridges.com

Comment: now that quotes from verifiable third-party sources have been added.  Just because the site isn't notable per  doesn't mean it can't be encyclopedic for other reasons.  The article is a mess right now, but once this nomination is closed and no-one's trying to prove a point anymore we can rewrite it into a perfectly good (if short) article about a perfectly good (if mildly obscure) reference source.  And besides, this is clearly not linkspam.  Exactly what would deleting this accomplish — :meta:Wiki is not paper|saving paper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: As it turns out, there already IS an article for structurae.de it was just written without the .de on the end: Structurae. Does that change anyone's view at all? Alexa rank for Structurae.de is WELL below the  guideline cutoff, at about 78,000... I see no clamor to allow all the websites between 1000 and 77000 to have articles... because, the article about structurae.de is not about it '''as a website''', it's about it '''as as database of information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)