Deletion of Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States

Comment: The article is not in great shape and needs some cleaning up and to have references added. However, the book does appear notable per  even if the case is not very strong. GoogleScholar returns 61 hitshttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Balkan+Idols:+Religion+and+Nationalism+in+Yugoslav+States%22&hl=en&lr=&start=0&sa=N. There were at least three in-depth reviews (all positive) that I was able to find: Slavic Review, Vol. 63, No. 1 (Spring, 2004), pp. 169-170 I got it from J-STOR, Journal of Southern Europe & the Balkans, Aug2003, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p262-263; Journal of the American Academy of Religion 2004 72(4):1059-1061. These are in-depth reviews that describe the book as a significant work. Also, Oxford University Press is a highly respected academic publishing house and the fact that the book was published there should be taken into account as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: unless more independent coverage of the book can be cited. The reviews in themselves are insufficient to satisfy , #1. While the cited reviews are indeed reviews that ''partially'' satisfy the criterion, all I can find from them are a slight overview of the book's contents and not enough of the "sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary," or, in this case, an analysis of the contents of the nonfiction book. Without that analysis (or anything indicating the importance of the book in the appropriate field of study), there really isn't much there in the article, and it comes across as a promotional blurb. While Oxford University Press is a respected publisher in academia, not every volume it prints would be worthy of its own article, but I hope to be able to see enough in here to make this worthy of keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)