Deletion of Atheist Atrocities fallacy

Comment: to tu quoque. This is a |badly sourced and |non-neutral personal |essay about one example of a ''tu quoque'' fallacy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: am leaning towards delete because the topic does not exist in any reliable sources. I see it on blogs on google. But I also checked Google Scholar to see if there was any scholarly discussion of it - sometimes it happens - and I literally found no hit whatsoever https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Atheist+Atrocities+fallacy%22&btnG=. The sources in the article are very poor: Kierkegaard and Locke do not discuss such a thing, Baggini actually links communism with atheism but adds that it does not apply vice versa. He says that "atheism formed an essential part of soviet communism, even though communism does not form an essential part of atheism”. Duh. The same goes for Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism and any other worldview. No belief system is inherently for a particular political configuration. Also most of the article has no citations whatsoever so that is pretty much . Now, if some reliable sources can be found for this supposed fallacy, then under those conditions, I would say keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)