Deletion of Jennifer MacLean

Comment: Not so much that I'm sold on the subject's notability - the award is about all that holds me here - but that this is being used as a blatant stalking horse is a  violation is objectionable.  To suggest that the subject is non-notable because she's chair of a company associated with an admin associated with a project to (wait for it) add or expand Wikipedia articles is baroque beyond belief.  I just went to the link
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: I believe that the argument "chair of allegedly notable organisation implies notable" is wrong: or at least, runs counter to , where ''notability of a parent entity or topic (of a parent-child "tree") does not always imply the notability of the subordinate entities'' would seem to apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: She is listed as one of the top 100 women by ''Edge Online'' http://www.edge-online.com/features/game-industrys-100-most-influential-women?page=0,6 here. Regardless of potential  and |meatpuppetry problems, there does exist a scant amount of |verifiability in this article. |conflict of interest issues can be reported to N if necessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SOCK||WP:V||WP:COI||WP:COIN)