Deletion of Rhoda McGaw Theatre

Comment: Per AleatoryPonderings and other sources found. '''Please note'''; that a week rationale for keep may grant a reprisal for now,  but a relisting, because the Nom was valid, could result in a different outcome. It is policy that information be |verified and that |primary sources do not advance notability. When notability is contested it become the |burden of those wishing inclusion to provide proof according to our policies and guidelines.  "Keep" gestures (wannabe !votes) will not usually suffice in many debates. If a venue is important it will likely have achieved notice and thereby sources. "All of the above" can be seen as |"keep because everyone else likes it", and sourcing through the "xternal links|external links section (certainly "not currently well-referenced" -- or at all) is rarely indicative of notability. I found some sources to validate some of the unsourced content and will see if there are more later. https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/fancy-working-new-victoria-theatre-13410088 The Ambassador Theatre Group, which includes the New Victoria Theatre , the Rhoda McGaw Theatre and the six-screen cinema in Woking
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BURDEN||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:E)

Comment: This is an article about al theatre, so the correct criteria are GNG and the not-very-helpful , not  .  It is clearly a professional venue, equivalent to an off-Broadway theatre in New York City.  The article is not currently well-referenced, and it quotes too extensively from the theatre's website, but this is a significant venue and is certainly notable.  It seems clear to me that this article simply needs a little attention from someone capable of going through the Google News and Google books sources and adding in-line cites to the statements made.  Maybe someone from the Theatre project would be willing to invest the time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILD||WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: I found the following two articles, which discuss the theatre—as opposed to performances in it—relatively in-depth. No idea where else they might be indexed, but I provided doc IDs for those with access to ProQuest. Most of the other coverage seems |routine, and I'm not quite sure how to treat a trade journal for the purposes of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NBUILD)