Deletion of Cheshire Cat in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: As per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Please note  and http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&q=trivia%20encyclopedia&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp.  Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYC)

Comment: as a valid subtopic of both Cheshire Cat and Works influenced by Alice in Wonderland. Books such as http://www.amazon.com/Alices-Adventures-Carroll-Popular-Culture/dp/0826414338 Alice's Adventures: Lewis Carroll in Popular Culture and http://www.amazon.com/Lewis-Carroll-popular-culture-continuing/dp/B0000E8PQH/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1214448152&sr=1-2 Lewis Carroll in the popular culture, a continuing list show that there is extensive coverage of Lewis Carroll's works and characters in the popular culture. And if you can't find |reliable sources among the over ''7 thousand'' published books that come up at http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_b/105-9983013-8825242?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=cheshire+cat&x=0&y=0 Amazon when searching for "Cheshire Cat", then you're not looking hard enough. That's at least prima facie evidence of this character's obvious and notable influence on popular culture
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as per Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material which advances a position.  While there are clearly numerous instances of a Cheshire Cat appearing in a variety of locations, there is no indication that there is a single |reliable source that has yet discussed "Cheshire Cat in popular culture" as a whole
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The article not indiscriminate, not a directory and not original research.  All we have here is  which is no reason to delete.  To demonstrate that the article can indeed be improved, I picked a detail (the image on LSD tabs) and was soon able to find multiple reliable sources and so have cited one.  Furthermore, deleting this article would just push the material back into the main article - pointless churning
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)