Deletion of Dark Awakening: A Star Wars Fan Film

Comment: Once the article is deleted, I recommend that it be |seasoned permanently
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: this comes nowhere close to meeting .  and  apply as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SELFPROMOTION||WP:COI)

Comment: Fails .  This belongs on Wikia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: for now per being |TOO SOON. But, as this was released less than a week ago, I'd opine the jury is not in just yet. In some cases tagging something from an https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kwjones30 inexperienced nob for a speedy https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_Awakening%3A_A_Star_Wars_Fan_Film&diff=650195420&oldid=650191884 within 25 minutes of it being contributed could be a bit bitey. But at least nominator {{u|TEB728}} gave this new article a whole https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_Awakening%3A_A_Star_Wars_Fan_Film&diff=650202208&oldid=650191884 hour and 14 minutes.  If or when it does gain suitable coverage, we can allow it to be undeleted and returned to mainspace.  '''No need to salt''' unless it becomes the object of repeated recreations. As there is no such recreation history, salting is unnecessary. I '''do''' believe that article creator {{u|Kwjones30}} '''is the same person''' as cinematographer/editor/composer Kevin Wendell Jones, and I would advise KWJ visit , pay attention to , and respect the consensus reached here.  He can ping me on my talk page if he feels it finally gains the requisite coverage to meet . {{ping|Narutolovehinata5}} being an internet-only or being "fan film" does not automatically equate to non-notability... as some such have indeed established suitable notability, and it is just barely possible this might too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYF||WP:PRIMER||WP:COI||WP:NF)