Deletion of OmiseGO

Comment: All the references above the exact type of generic financial coverage that is prohibited by  and asserts , and . There is no coverage outside startup news, which is expressely non notable sources. It is exactly that type of information that 100's of other crpyto currencies are reporting, and  is entirely generic. There is no real secondary coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: does not meet ; sourcing offered is in passing, routine notices and / or . As an aside, the article does not even hide its advertorial intent; it opens with: "OmiseGO is a company ''hoping to'' build an open..." (emphasis mine). This is all about the company's goals and aspirations, not an encyclopedia entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:SPIP)

Comment: Once again, {{u|Cunard}} posts a wall of text containing too many references. I thought he had agreed to limit his style to 3 at a time. Cunard also appears to ignore  guidelines and instead quotes GNG's ''sufficient coverage in reliable sources'' while ignoring the clarifications provided by NCORP. This behaviour is extremely disruptive to the AfD process, especially considering that most of the time, Cunard selectively omits the parts of references that show why the references fail the criteria for establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)