Deletion of John D. Bernard

Comment: There is more than enough evidence for this subject to pass . The subject, in addition to what is written above, being awarded a Doctorate in 2018, has enough verifiable, objective evidence and significant attention from independent sources. From a quick search online I can see the subject is a judge of marketing excellence in the UK from an article published https://www.festivalofmarketing.com/enter/judges-list?utm_source=InternalEmail&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=MWM18EM2&utm_campaign=MWM18 today, 18th April 2018. The subject has been consistently in the news around the marketing industry for over a decade and thus is not a mere short-term interest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: for failing . Where is the general, wider notability, beyond the sporadic mentions in trade media? (Ad media, at that.) I half-jokingly accept the subject's own verdict about "his children’s births, his wedding, and Luton Town’s 1988 Cup win" being more important. We have  doing overtime in entrepreneur-related articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Not only waded through all the refs (ugh!) but also reviewed the history and was astounded how much of this article was written by the same sock farm as turned up to vote! It seriously looks like a single paid editor. Notwithstanding that egregious deceit, it still fails . '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)