Deletion of Sharia patrols (London)

Comment: Passes  per ''ongoing'' news coverage over a significant period of time (over a year). The topic does not qualify for a WP:NOTNEWS deletion due to this ongoing significant coverage that the topic has received
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per Andy. Sorry if an article which is sourced to many reliable  sources with significant coverage from early 2013 to present offends some editors, or if an article about Moslems in London patrolling  streets to impose Sharia law might reflect badly on someone's religion, but it satisfies  and overcomes the hurdle of OTNEWS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Just to add, the link to Choudary was made by me, and is entirely due to the evidence provided by the reliable sources I discovered when checking/filling in details in this article. The claim by the OP that this is "part of a continuing (possibly racist) campaign by various accounts against Anjem Choudary" is patently absurd: I had made no edits whatsoever to the Choudary article until I started getting involved with this one. I would remind that editor to please |assume good faith - taking the line "guilty until proven innocent" is not the way to open dialogue with other editors
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)