Deletion of Erik Shaw

Comment: per above, does not demonstrate notability. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:BAHAD)

Comment: part of the reason why this article is being considered for deletion is the lack of sources. To an extent if the article were tightened up to remove extraneous detail and information that is not sourced, it might survive (no certainty, of course), however in its current state it looks like a large, unsourced article on a living person, containing |original research. Due to legal concerns, biographies of living people are subject to particular scrutiny. As such, I'd like to suggest that those that feel the article should be kept read ,  and . These might help to clarify the issues with the article and might help if someone decides to try to rewrite the article so that it meets the guidelines. Finally, in regards to spreading the message of the subject's work, is there not some website out there that offers free hosting? If not, surely there is a company out there that would be willing to donate server space to what is (in my opinion as a former serviceman) a worthy cause if they were approached in the appropriate manner? Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BLP||WP:CITE||WP:LAYOUT)