Deletion of NoHomers.net

Comment: I think this just barely makes it under the wire of  (if the claims of commentary on dvd and other evidentiary claims supporting notability are true). I note that if you parse the language of the  section, a case can be made for both keep and delete. Criterion: "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." Is the DVD commentary a fit? First we have to look at all claims and decide whether that's "multiple." Fairly easy to say the DVD is non-trivial. But does ''mention'' in the dvd render nohomer "the subject" of this published work? I would say no. As stated in the exclusion section immediately following, this does not include "a brief summary of the nature of the content." I vote weak keep because of the (possibly trivial brief summary)  mention of nohomer, but nevertheless in apparently ''multiple''  non-trivial published works
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Looks like 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)

Comment: No sign that this site meets |our website notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)