Deletion of Functional temporalism

Comment: after making various online searches, I could find nothing but definitions, blogs, and lists of random phrases.  Leads me to think this is a |hoax or |neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:NEO)

Comment: this looks extremely like a hoax but, as Sokal showed, it's hard to tell postmodernism from parody; in any case a Wikipedia article should have (a) meaning and (b) |reliable sources, and this has neither
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails .  It is very rare, if not unheard of, that a technical term, however obscure, does not show up ''somewhere'' in google scholar.  This one succeeds in getting zero hits across the entire web, if wikis and similar are filtered out (I have a CSE doing this for me). No one denies that there are good sources to be had offline, but none have been put forward.  Not even the name of a proponent (or a critic) so we can look up their work.  At best this would seem to be a neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)