Deletion of Jonathan Park (2nd nomination)

Comment: or merge ''very'' selectively to Institute for Creation Research. Since the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Park|last AfD no |reliable, independent sources have been identified and I am unable to find any. Based on this I do not think that the topic meets the criteria for an independent article as set out in the |general notability guideline. The arguments for keeping the article presented at the last AfD appear to be weak, based on - so far unfounded - speculation that third party sourcing existed and unsupported claims of popularity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN)

Comment: main article with Vision Forum; '''Delete''' the two subordinate lists. If we are to believe a primary source, this show is syndicated on ~500 radio stations across the country. I clicked on a few states at random http://www.jonathanpark.com/corporate/stationmap.asp here and each had between 10 to 15 radio stations.  I see no reason to disbelieve what is on their website even though it can't be used as a |reliable source for the article. I think that ~500 stations is fairly extensive syndication and the number of people who listen to the show is probably high enough (how many listeners would there be— 100 per station? 1,000 per station?) that the show meets our |notability standards in the sense that it is worthy of being noted or worthy of notice.  Now, while this notability very well may be true, we have a grave problem of |verifying it.  Since we can't verify, we must merge the basic facts to a small section of the parent article on the organization that creates this show. Merging is valid, since the notability guidelines only determine which topics are worthy of an article, but should not be used to NC|directly determine or limit the content of articles. Since appropriate sources cannot be found for this topic, we should consider |merging the article's content into a broader article providing context. —&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NNC||WP:FAILN)

Comment: There are several Google hits, but they are all advertising for the series, or for its spin-off merchandise, plus one or two blog entries. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)