Deletion of Neil Lazarus (2nd nomination)

Comment: So heavily promotional that it could be a case for #G11, it is not obvious that any of the sources present in the article are in-depth, neutral, reliable, and independent, and good sources were also not obvious in searching. I'm not convinced that he doesn't pass , but I'm also not convinced that he does, and in any case  applies to the current text
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:GNG||WP:TNT)