Deletion of John Rosatti (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom.  applies here, and it is doubtful whether the sources are good and frequent enough to justify inclusion of the allegations in this BLP. Yet if the article exists, it will always attract this content (see article history). Given the subject's marginal notability, and considering the possibility of harm to him, having the article and policing it to make sure it is at all times "written conservatively", as required by , is just not worth our while. We should review the situation if more significant sources appear, e.g. mention of the allegations in several top-quality papers like the NYT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:NPF||WP:BLP)

Comment: per , . If the businesses are notable they can have articles of their own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:N)