Deletion of Mary Pensworth Reagor

Comment: Notability is not inherited from that of fuzzy logic.  The method that she invented has little coverage, and what little there is is incidental.  I'm uncertain whether internal company award (even from a company as big as Lockheed Martin) is more like  C3 or C5.  Whichever, the case is weak, and should be supported by some evidence of impact.  I don't see much mention of the Lynn Reagor method outside of profiles of the subject; Datascape is harder to search for, but I didn't find anything.  I'm watching this AfD in case better evidence of notability is uncovered
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: There is a couple of uni articles on her, there is a gbook ref, magazine ref and I think there is probably more if a deep search is done. I think passes ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE||WP:BIO||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: As a program that honors less than 1% of the Lockheed technical staff https://www.reliableplant.com/Read/22725/Lockheed-Martin-honors-technical-leaders the Lockheed Technical Fellow honor appears to be close to the sort of thing we count for #C3, although obviously not in as academic a context. And in being based on the Agnes Scott College profile and the TCU magazine piece, the article has a plausible case for the multiple in-depth sources required by , but independence is dubious in both cases because of her alumna status. There's also a little more coverage at https://womenmathematicians-blog.tumblr.com/post/3326008360/mary-pensworth-reagor and https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2005-10-04-Lockheed-Martins-Mary-Reagor-Honored-By-Women-in-Aerospace-Organization but as a blog post and a press release from her employer they don't much strengthen the case for GNG. https://www.aviationtoday.com/2005/12/01/people-42/ This source is a little better. And https://www.womeninaerospace.org/events/gallery/2005awards.html this one is primary for the award she won, but independent of her almae matres and employer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: I did another search for sources and I still couldn't find significant independent coverage that shows me that she meets  or any other notability criteria.  She definitely fails to meet  and I don't believe her award  is sufficient to confer automatic notability.  All independent coverage is related to the one award (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPROF||WP:BIO1E)