Deletion of LG Williams (3rd nomination)

Comment: as notability has not been established; based on |reliable sources he fails .  Passing mentions like ''Osuna, who is also showing works by Soshi Mastunobe and L.G. Williams.'' don't do much more that verify showings in international markets.  Given more articles like the one in ''The Japan Times'' would go towards establishing that he has ''won significant critical attention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: almost on the basis of process alone. This should have gone to  where changes since the last AFDs could be considered by the community and approval given (or not) for the recreation of this article. Instead, serial sock-puppeteers simply recreated it (twice) and have filled it with ref-spam in an attempt to make it look legit. But many are older than 2 years and would have been available during the last discussions. The article would seem to suffer from the same problems that it did in the past. The community supported (in my view) |salting the first time around but that wasn't done (for whatever reason). The sources provided are much the same as last time - self-promotional nonsense from a ''full-time-real-estate-agent / part-time-artist''. They are headlines in the same way that the guys from ''Jackass'' get headlines for stapling their anatomy to things. Yeah, it's "coverage" but seriously... read the actual articles... they're all about how he did something, it won't work, but it was a bit funny, what was his name again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV||WP:SALT)