Deletion of List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number twos

Comment: per notability assered by Warden. A line is drawn, but how is number ones inherently notable and number twos quite trivial? The list is not |indiscriminate, all or almost all entries meet the notability guidelines for its own article per |common selection criteria. The topic itself has actually gotten more notable since the raise of reality shows and its winner almost always taking the Christmas number one spot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:LSC)

Comment: No policy-based reason to delete has been provided as istcruft is just an essay which only amounts to .  The general concept of the list is notable per ISTN, as evidenced by the http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/not-quite-top-of-the-pops-stuck-at-number-two-for-christmas-1845917.html Independent feature and other works such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-LgXlQnsDK4C The Billboard Book of Number Two Singles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:LISTN)