Deletion of Dorothy Berry

Comment: Looking at #4
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Very borderline wikipedia technical general notability but works being held by the NGA I suggest confirms notability. NGA holding meets /. Editor COI is not grounds for deletion. Notability and verifiability of the article content is. And this content seems okay or fixable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:ARTIST)

Comment: If the article makes the claim that work by an artist is in the collection of a national museum, and there are issues with verifying that claim, I would suggest a failed verification template and a discussion with the editor who made the claim, instead of an AfD nomination. But, like I said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigid Hanrahan, I am concerned about the lack of critical reception. Even for artist who  technically meet some of the secondary notability criteria of , for example being represented in a collection, we still need someone else to write something we can base an article on. I would really like to see some in-depth reviews from reliable, independent sources, and artshub is not an independent source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)