Deletion of Arex

Comment: per Postdlf,s argument. I read the St Joseph's article and the while the coverage of this character is not super significant, neither is it trivial. I haven't evaluated the other sources (and yes I know multiple |supersources are required) but it's obvious to me that Arex shouldn't be a red link
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:SUPERSOURCE)

Comment: There is no evidence that the fictional character meets the |general notability guideline and I do not see anything to suggest the any article about him can be anything other than a |plot-only description of a fictional work. A |search engine test does not show #Notability|reliable third-party sources that address the fictional character in detail to presume that he deserves a stand-alone article. No reliable secondary source gives reception or significance for the fictional character, so I do not see a valid presumption to keep the article. Since the article has no |verifiability due to the complete lack of references, all content is |original research by synthesis at best, so I believe that a merge is not justified
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:SET||WP:V||WP:V||WP:SYN)