Deletion of 2013 Peru plane crash

Comment: Crashes happen. Sometimes they're notble; others, not. FoxyOrange and YSSYguy spell out clearly why this one is not; there is a news spike, and nothing more.  requires, well, persistence; widespread but brief geographic coverage |is to be expected in this day and age of instant communications. A tragic accident, but does not clear the bar; if, in the future, something changes to establish notability, deletion is not forever
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: The article isn't a good candidate for future expansion. Right now its a prime example of  or namely 6 citations for a text section that is 55 words in all. That's one citation for every nine words. It's a file and forget tragedy that is because it disappears from the news very quickly. This tragedy doesn't have the huge initial barrage of news reports this one had that also ended in AFDhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Murder_of_Melissa_Ketunuti. People thought that was notable in the last five weeks there's been exactly onehttps://www.google.com/search?q=Melissa+Ketunuti&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=Melissa+Ketunuti&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=sYJ&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=v-k5Ub66EZOK9QTK7IGoBg&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.43287494,d.eWU&fp=d93ec3111eb0fb29&biw=1366&bih=577 original news article concerning the tragedy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:BOMBARDMENT)

Comment: Number of fatalities doesn't make a crash notable. Take for instance thishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2009_Montana_Pilatus_PC-12_crash where 14 died.  is not a valid argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)