Deletion of Stanley Krippner

Comment: Krippner and  If we look at  we see only one area in which Krippner is borderline; item 5.  Under this item if a person has held a named chair at a major educational institution they would be notable.  Now according to Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center Krippner holds a named chair.  Those in favour of his notability might point to that.  But, just a few points
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: doesn't pass any relevant (or otherwise) notability criteria, lacks . That it's been here 3 years means this should have been done 2.5 years ago at least
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WP:PROF is treated above, and  is likewise not met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: this looks a marginal call to me. There are surely many thousands of academics that would meet such a bar for notability. None of the sources seem very reliable, considering this is a . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The citations aren't strong enough for me to use them in an argument for keeping, and I think Simonm223 clearly refutes the argument based on  #5
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He's a well-established fringe author, which meets the notability requirement 1 and 3 from . That his books and references to him are fringe diminishes the reliability of the work itself, not the notability of the person. The sources, while unreliable on science, are reliable for establishing that he has a substantial body of work (3) and that he is respected among his own fringe peers (1). The article itself, however, needs to be rewritten, but that's not a criteria for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Stanley+Krippner%22 Gnews search has multiple newspapers quoting him as an authority repeatedly, meaning he meets  criterion 7 (major impact outside academia in their academic specialty). These newspapers include the NYT, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Chicago Tribune, etc. I offer no opinion as to whether his biography should present him as a serious scientist or a proponent of fringe theories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Any working professor is going to have published works.  ''It is part of the job description.'' That is why we have .  He doesn't meet that standard
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I've added the APA Award for Distinguished Contributions to the International Advancement of Psychology to the article as well as several other awards Krippner has received, and cited this to the APA. Considering our own American_Psychological_Association#Awards says that this award is one of "the highest honors given by the APA, and among the highest honors that a psychologist or psychology researcher can receive", that clearly meets criteria 2) ''The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level'' from 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: While I understand the author angle, the article is ''not'' written in that context. Rather, the article paints him quite clearly as an academic &ndash; necessitating  as our yardstick. Corollary: if you want to eval him as an author, re-write the article as such. I'm afraid that as an academic, his impact does not seem to be very high. I used this Web of Science|WoS query: "Author (krippner s*) Refined by: Institutions=(SAYBROOK INST OR SAYBROOK GRAD SCH OR SAYBROOK GRAD SCH & RES CTR OR SAYBROOK INST GRAD SCH OR SAYBROOK INST GRAD SCH & RES CTR OR SAYBROOK INST PSYCHOL OR SAYBROOK UNIV) Timespan=All Years. Databases=SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A&HCI", finding 29 journal articles (plus other stuff like book reviews and abstracts) for an h-index of 6. His highest-impact article has 141 cites, but this paper has >30 authors with his name appearing about a quarter of the way through, so it would be difficult to assign a large portion of the credit to him personally. With an h of 6, the citation count obviously falls off extremely rapidly. I do not argue that his number of "publications" is large &ndash; I checked http://stanleykrippner.weebly.com/--complete-bibliography.html his CV, as suggested by the anon above, and there is indeed a lot listed there. The problem again is that his scholarship has clearly not had much of an impact in the  sense. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: fails  per Simonm223, no |verifiable substantiation (reviews in RS publications, etc) for assertions that he meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:V||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Considering that an h-index of 18 would indicate full professorship I don't see how that contributes to notability under  not every professor is notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)