Deletion of Land Down Under (film)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: and return when can be sourced per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per , article can be recreated when more verifiable facts about the film surface
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Neutral''' For the perusal of everyone (especially the Filipino Wikipedians who say "Delete" using  as a basis), the notability guideline for all future films is |here.  At first glance, the article looks set for the deletion bin.  However, after taking a look at the guideline, the film, which is '''tentatively''' titled ''Land Down Under'', already has a set date for the commencement of principal photography (per http://www.philstar.com/archives.php?&aid=2008082775&type=2& the Philippine Star, this is set for August 29 in Malaybalay City, Bukidnon), fulfilling the first tenet of the guideline.  However, this raises the question of whether or not the '''actual''' filming is notable per the same guideline, which states: "Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines".  If the filming in itself is notable per , then I would be more inclined to vote "Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NFF)

Comment: per  and : no assertation of notability, no |reliable sources appear to |verify the article's single-sentence content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCRYSTAL)