Deletion of Samo Stanič

Comment: These papers ''are'' on Google Scholar and ''have'' been cited. A 'better' search is not difficult: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author%3A%22S+Stani%C4%8D%22 searching for "S Stanič" as an author finds 309 papers and gives him an h-index around 30. Quite a nice illustration of the dangers of a simplistic interpretation of citation indices, however: I checked the most highly-cited ones, which each have well over a hundred authors and arise from the Belle Collaboration, an international collaboration of more than 400 physicists and engineers (if you believe Wikipedia). Normalizing ''h'' by a divisor reflecting the average number of co-authors (h-index#Criticism|as Hirsch suggested in his original paper) would seem likely to give a quotient in single figures and hence provide little or no evidence that he might satisfy the first criterion of #Criteria. Neither did I see anything in the GNews & GBooks results that would constitute significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Samo+Stanič&hl=en Google scholar search brings up very few citations to his work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)