Deletion of Simon Grindrod

Comment: per , , and . Like this subject, lower level party officials are not notable. A |search online found a few news articles, but nothing outside of the usual local coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:MILL||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Cape Town is certainly a large and important enough city that its city councillors could potentially keep substantive and well-sourced articles that featured detail on their political significance, but this is written much more like the kind of "staff" profile you might expect to see on the city council's own |self-published website about itself, and cites exactly zero |reliable sources at all. Being deputy leader of a small political party is also not a notability freebie that would exempt him from having to be more substantive and better sourced than this, either. And it's existed for 12 years in this state without ever seeing a whit of improvement, to boot. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source something much ''better'' than this, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be written and sourced much better than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS)

Comment: per , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:MILL)