Deletion of How Funny

Comment: per , Schmidt's expansion and sourcing clearly demonstrate notability (I suspect there is a lot more, but difficult to find because of some obvious language barriers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: per meeting  as a source that says it has released and speaks (even if briefly) toward a film project directly and in more-than-trivial detail is exactly what |criteria requires. In my own looking, I quickly and easily found representative more:http://english.onlinekhabar.com/2016/05/02/376297http://www.ecanadanepal.com/2016/04/nepali-film-how-funny-movie-review-on.htmlhttp://www.filmyjoy.net/2016/04/how-funny-two-days-box-office.htmlhttp://nepaliactress.com/priyanka-karki-transparent-dress-in-how-funny-premier/http://glamournepal.net/funny-pictures/http://nepalinsider.com/how-funny-movie-box-office-collection-report/http://devarbhabhi.org/interview-with-nilu-doma-sherpa-how-funny-director-2016.html  And to the {{u|Dan arndt|nominator}} and to {{u|Sheepythemouse}}, I politely remind that notability is based upon |sources BEING available and not upon their use in an article.  I humbly share the fun of |diligence and the India media search tools of . Better we work to improve this per what is available, than delete it because it is an ugly stub... IMHO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NF||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:INDAFD)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: ping|MichaelQSchmidt}} I am presuming that your comments are reliant on criteria 2 of , in which a film is considered notable if it is subject of the 'publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.' Some of the sources you have cited are questionable about whether they are 'reliable' sources however others such as ''The Kathmandu Post'' and the http://english.onlinekhabar.com/2016/05/02/376297 onlinekhabar.com review are probably enough to get it over the line. The article itself does need a lot of work to bring it up to acceptable standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)