Deletion of Michael Arattukulam

Comment: as per the book sources that provide verification and Roman Catholic bishops articles are usually kept as per rticles for deletion/Common outcomes which is a form of case law or should be treated as such in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: per , as well as the significant coverage of this individual that can be found in print, particularly their contribution to Vatican II. I would also consider the sources of the Catholic Church to be sufficiently independent from this Bishop to be contribute to establishing his notability, unless said source has been generally depreciated or found unusable for those purposes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:CLERGY)

Comment: per  and . That is, 1) the Roman Catholic church is not considered too closely connected for its publications to contribute to notability, 2) The sources likely exist in local language(s) that have not been identified, or 3) both.  I just cannot see deleting a verifiable Catholic bishop who existed before the Internet just because we can't conveniently find online sources about him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:CLERGY||WP:NBISHOP)