Deletion of Cambridge Social Ontology Group

Comment: It's a reasonable search term, but I don't see any case for |notability (linking because Legacypac has apparently forgotten |what it means!) Which is not surprising because these kind of groups come and go all the time. Tony Lawson seems like a good target. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:42)

Comment: notable long running study group at Cambridge University involving numerous notable people. What is not notable here? If the group has gone dormant, all the more notable and less promotional. We are not a directory of active groups, and we don't delete pages because a subject is no longer active. The nom first gutted the page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cambridge_Social_Ontology_Group&type=revision&diff=846134799&oldid=846124234 before seeking deletion. IF this page should not exist, it should be merged to some subpage of Cambridge University but since that is such a large topic, this makes a reasonable 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: as Randykitty has pointed out, there is no significant coverage of the group itself, just individual members. There are several passing mentions of the group in various scholarly acknowledgement sections and the like, but I can't find any significant coverage of the group and its impacts. There doesn't seem to be much material worth merging into a separate social ontology article (currently a redirect to Structure and agency), which is the other alternative I would consider. I do want to note however that |notability is not temporary, and whether the group is defunct or not is not a deciding factor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)