Deletion of The Hit (2016)

Comment: Looks like a case of  especially considering that it's a smaller movie
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: for now, with no prejudice against recreation later. According to , ''"Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines."'' The film will probably receive better and more general sourcing after it is released, and at that time the article can be restored and expanded. It could be userfied now if anyone volunteers to take it on. I looked for a redirect but could not find any likely target; apparently none of the people associated with this film have articles here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Smaller movie" is not a negative |criteria for film and  is not a criteria for |sources. As a stub article which can grow overtime and through regular editing, we're fine with https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Hit_%282016%29&type=revision&diff=716690993&oldid=715740628 what is now sourcing the improved article as |per guideline they address the topic directly and in detail
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:SUBSTANTIAL||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: aside from material obviously written by the film's producers (which isn't independent of them) and IMDB the only sources are two articles in the same local newspaper. This is problematic for a number of reasons: the news organisation probably isn't terribly reliable, the articles mostly consist of quotes from people involved in the production of the film, and we generally require multiple sources from different people/organisations to demonstrate significant coverage per . I wasn't able to find more impressive sources and there's no indication that any of the other  criteria are met. I would advise waiting until the film is released - if it gets enough reviews then we could certainly have an article on it then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILM)

Comment: I found two sources, both of which look to be small articles written in a local newspaper. Local sources tend to be depreciated on here since it's easier for a local person to gain coverage, however even if this wasn't the case these sources still wouldn't show the in-depth coverage needed to pass . I did clean the article up to remove the promotional puffery and on a side note, I've also blocked the article creator as a promotional username, since it's the same as the company producing the movie
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)