Deletion of DDC-I, Inc.

Comment: I find this all a little bizarre. Minna Sora no Shita—in future, please "make a good-faith attempt to confirm that... sources don't exist" before nominating, per . Scope creep: you argue for keeping it because you assume notability based on age but also thinks sources "will be" quite hard to find. Herostratus: you take the opposite view that since sources "must be" hard to find, that means it probably never gained notability. And Nolelover, you give no reason for your opinion. But no one bothered to check whether ''sources are hard to find''. Well, it literally took about 20 seconds to confirm that sources are abundant. http://www.google.com/search?q=DDC-I&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tbs=bks%3A1&q=%22DDC+I%22+Phoenix&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=a01cde7f8e6d1e8f Google books search with the companies home town included as a false positive limiter and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22DDC+I%22+Phoenix&cf=all news results
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)