Deletion of Ivalua

Comment: non-notable company that fails , , and . Article concerns a decently sized cloud computing company, but nothing indicates why Ivalua is distinct (implying to me it is |run of the mill) or notable when compared to other cloud computing companies. Coverage is lacking, with most sources being press releases about the company's sales, funding, or routine company acquisitions. I agree with the nominator on the point that the Silicon Valley Business Journal is the only reliable source cited by the article, an I would expand by noting that the SVBJ article in question does not provide in-depth coverage of Ivalua and is rather concerned with announcing a new investment in the company. The article also contains quotes from Ivalua's CEO and data provided by the company, so it may not be entirely third party. This type of article was one of the reasons NCORP was recently strengthened. The other sources cited are also lackluster, with one (http://cporising.com/2015/11/24/ivalua-on-air-whirlpool-generali-group-offer-tips-for-deploying-a-global-solution/) being from a corporate-sponsored media site and another (http://sourcinginnovation.com/wordpress/2013/08/26/ivalua-proving-their-mettle-with-source-to-settle-part-iv/) being a wordpress site. In short, Ivalua is a company that exists but makes (and I my view has) no real claims to notability or significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SIGCOV||WP:MILL)