Deletion of SF Tech Beat

Comment: unless someone can produce evidence of satisfying |Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which so far nobody has done. A Wikipedia editor speculating on what would be the outcome of a survey of people in San Francisco is not a reliable source, and even if we had evidence (not speculation), a lot of people thinking that something "made an impact" is not the basis on which Wikipedia's notability guidelines are based. The actual sources that we have are a whois record, a page not even mentioning SF Tech Beat (so far as I can see) and a traffic record for the site: none of those even begins to be relevant to Wikipedia's notability standards. ''The editor who uses the pseudonym
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: this may well be an influential publication in the SF tech sphere, but I'm just not finding any  in  to warrant keeping it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: as there is no evidence that this passes . Simply existing is not equivalent to notability. There needs to be secondary sources about the subject itself and which discuss the subject in detail. As few passing mentions are not good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB)