Deletion of Andy Ainscow (2nd nomination)

Comment: per BigHaz. Ainscow played in the Football League 23 times and so easily passes . The nominator's points have already been addressed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sports notability guideline and long-standing consensus and discussion have led to where we are now. I should add that pointy nominations like this don't help your case on that page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: This is a form of forum-shopping , making the same proposal only a few weeks after being declined. Accept the consensus and move on. Secondly, as Ainscow's career was pre-internet,  requires you to make a reasonable search of off-line sources. You make no mention in either AFD of any such search. As for your argument about , the topic is not required to meet both WP:NSPORTS and , just one or the other. To quote :A topic is rebuttable presumption|presumed to merit an article if it meets ''either'' the general notability guideline below, ''or'' the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline... my emphasis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:FORUMSHOP||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)