Deletion of Aimee Osbourne

Comment: Per  which states: ''"Family members of celebrities (...) only have their own independent article if and when it can be reliably sourced that they have done something significant and notable in their own right, and would thereby merit an independent article even if they didn't have a famous relative. Note that this also includes newborn babies of celebrities: although such births typically receive a flurry of press coverage, this testifies to the notability of the parent, not the child."''. I can't find any source about her doing ''"something significant and notable in (her) own right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Notability is not inherited, but Amiee Osbourne does have significant coverage in her own right; there are at least three reliable sources in the article which establish this http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,49331,00.html, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,80322,00.html, http://www.teentelevision.com/2003/12/02/aimee-osbourne-mtv-have-made-my-father-a-laughing-stock. Of course, we must respect privacy; this does not prohibit the article's existence. Our BLP policy has #Presumption in favor of privacy|extensive guidance on this issue - if this is followed, we shouldn't have a problem. She is notable and we can make sure that we adhere to BLP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)