Deletion of Goldsea Asian American Daily

Comment: The current article is written badly enough that it's ambiguous whether it's a promotional page or an attack page; whichever it is, it's a website that doesn't make a strong case for notability under the |guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: lacks in-depth coverage in |reliable sources. News hits http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%2Bgoldsea&scoring=a&sa=N&start=0 consist of quotes or citations ''from'' their website, not articles ''about'' their website. Gbooks hits are a bit better http://books.google.com/books?q=%2Bgoldsea&lr=&sa=N&start=0 with a short profile of the site http://books.google.com/books?id=BvM8nyyyFlcC&pg=PA200&dq=%2Bgoldsea#PPA200,M1 and a bunch more citations of articles they wrote, but still not enough to establish notability in my opinion. Blog hits are, of course, ignorable. I don't find any support for their claims to be the "World Wide Web's biggest and most popular Asian American site" or "first Asian American media website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)