Deletion of Bhutan–Brazil relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: pure . These are just random facts brought together to suggest a |notable diplomatic relationship that simply isn't there. The fact that one country's diplomat might sit two tables away from the other's diplomat at dinner because they happen to be members of the same international organisation has ''zero'' to do with notability. There's nothing that couldn't be mentioned in either country's foreign relations articles. That's said, I can't imagine ''any'' of these "facts" ''would'' be mentioned - they wouldn't even be relevant there. The trade relationship is, ''"in some years even non-existent"''. And yet this "non-existent" relationship has generated enough coverage to be considered notable? I don't think so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:N)

Comment: upon a source review, squeaks by as meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This seems like it falls under the spirit (if not the letter) or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCASE)