Deletion of Your Turn, Darling

Comment: Assuming Noah's shortcut above was actually meant to read , this seems like a random, unjustified delete request which could be equally applied to thousands of other non-English language films, and would be equally unjustified. The film also has articles in the French, Italian and German Wikipedias – combined with the sources in the English article, there is enough independent coverage from reliable sources in multiple languages to support notability. Just because the English article is a stub, doesn't make it a case for delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: Other language versions of this article have been invoked, but looking at those articles, there is next to nothing in them with most of them unsourced, so there is not even usable information there that could be used to expand and better source this article. The only one to have multiple sources is the German WP page, but those all appear to be blogs, broken links, or otherwise unreliable sources. So, it is not just the English article that is a stub, this seems to be a consistent problem for this topic. Now, that doesn't mean sources in other languages don't exist on it, which is why I haven't voted delete, but I would say that with the current evidence that is how I would lean. But if anyone could meet , in any language, I would feel differently
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: as per the multiple reliable book and internet sources identified in this discussion which in total show significant independent coverage so that  is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)