Deletion of Mormon pornography

Comment: The topic passes , having received significant coverage in reliable sources. Some source examples are listed below
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It definitely exists, and there's coverage in reliable sources. There is nothing defamatory about this article. I am mystified by this claim. The porn itself may be weird (to some) and upsetting to Mormons, but Wikipedia is |not censored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: An interesting list of sources from NorthAmerica, interesting because they skew left-wing creating an interesting 21st century echo of the 17th - 19th vogue among left-wing intellectuals (some was translated into English, but it was usually written in Paris, Vienna and other Catholic places as a means of attacking the Catholic Church - I'm lookin' at you Marquis de Sade).  This can similarly be construed as a similar attack on the institution of the  Mormon Church and on Mormons as an identity group.  We are not, however, dealing with the extent or caliber of sourcing available to support Convent pornography.  Because I only find a handful of sources, this runs afoul of .   Because sourcing is weak, no scholarship, no serious journalism, just color stories and Gizmodo, a group blog - I do not see that this passes WP:GNG.  Because sources skew leftist or leftish and are publications with an anti- or irreligious audience and slant (Alternet, Salt Lake City Weekly, Vice (magazine), I think keeping it risks  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:UNDUE||WP:ATTACK)