Deletion of Post-cult trauma

Comment: none of the sources are reliable, thus there is no proof this term is notable per . I found http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Post-cult+trauma%22 zero Ghits on Google news, and http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Post-cult%20trauma%22&hl=en&ned=us&tab=nw#q=%22Post-cult+trauma%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&prmd=ivns&ei=35jeTb-IA-Py0gGIhoytCg&start=10&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7e74ed319f8060e1&biw=1259&bih=823 piles of junk science at Google. The http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Post-cult+trauma%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C33&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 seven articles at Google scholar are very much a mixed bag - a draft of ''this article'', a link to answer.com, and a book on Google books, none of which are reliable sources. I don't see how this even passes  as  a fringe theory or pop psychology
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Many uses of the termhttp://www.carolgiambalvo.com/uploads/3/0/9/2/3092210/final_document_giambalvo_and_henry_colorado_pdf_03052010.pdfhttp://www.refocus.org/critical-thinking.html are restricted to the works of Carol Giambalvo or reFOCUS, the anti-cult support group she co-founded.  I think this concept would certainly have a place in an article about the group or its beliefs, but we don't have one of those (and I offer no opinion whether ''it'' meets reliability standards).  Outside of reFOCUS, there are uses of the term in books from 2003http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=75JSQtZLCq0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=%22post-cult+trauma%22&ots=b2aLLdb-TK&sig=kO3HPAYEVKcfzXxZwvo_rNeka6U#v=onepage&q=%22post-cult%20trauma%22&f=false and 2010http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=S63sb0FF-CQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA129&dq=%22post-cult+trauma%22&ots=c4jiw23lsG&sig=whdHOUcdxLENQuE37YXu9IQ-YNE#v=onepage&q=%22post-cult%20trauma%22&f=false.  I do not think either is sufficiently substantive coverage to assert notability.  That's doubly true if the community feels that  should apply here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: may warrant a brief mention in an article on the anti-cult movement, but right now this article seems to violate  and is questionably sourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)