Deletion of National Mario Day

Comment: there is sufficient RS coverage to meet our inclusion criteria.  Sorry, but I have to wonder how many of those weighing in here actually took a look at the references.  The ''Christian Science Monitor'' focussed an article around how Mario Day was an opportunity for parents to bond with their children, and named Mario Day events parents could take their children to -- in 2014.  We are not supposed to weigh in on AFDs based on whether we '''personally''' think a topic is trivial, or silly.  We should base our opinion on whether the professional editors and professional authors we rely on -- at  -- think a topic is worth writing about.  Well, if you look, you see serious RS have written about this topic.  That is all that is required.  A delete based on a personal opinion the topic is trivial or silly is one of the arguments named in rguments to avoid -- 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:A||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)