Deletion of Jammu and Kashmir People's Movement

Comment: u|Mhveinvp}} {{u|Kautilya3}} The issue is that in the provided sources, which are all |routine coverage, the party is only subject to passing mentions in the articles listed, and not even mentioned directly in a few of the sources. If it's a recently started party, as you claim, then perhaps it is  for an article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: It's not notable political party and just two month old party which didn't won any election yet. Not given enough coverage by reliable and major sources to meet otability criteria. If this political party will play significant role in politics of India and in upcoming elections then it should be added. There is no deadline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:INDIA contributor here). Non notable political party that has not won any elections and no indication why it is notable. Notablity is . Whatever coverage this party is getting is dependent coverage based on its founder. This includes all the links above and those on the article. This dependent coverage cannot be used to claim notability. Also fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) due to this basic criteria. I would like to thank
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: A couple more recent sources.https://kashmirlife.net/new-front-old-frontier-issue-13-vol-11-213387/ New Front, Old Frontier, Kashmir Life, 26 June 2019. Hakeem Irfan Rashid, https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/peoples-united-front-another-agenda-and-another-alliance-in-kashmir/amp_articleshow/69852767.cms#stickyBanner People's United Front: Another agenda and another alliance in Kashmir, Economic Times, 19 June 2019. Clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)