Deletion of Institute for Cultural Diplomacy

Comment: AfD is for discussing the notability of a subject, not the quality of an article.  That the article reads like an advert is inconsequential to this discussion unless you can prove that editor !voting here have a  and even that would only affect the perception of their opinions.  For this AfD to end with a substantial '''Delete''' !votes, you would need to explain why every reference in the article cannot be used to establish notability under any subsection of .  The burden of proof of non-notabilty lies with the nominator and '''Delete''' !voters
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:N)

Comment: I've just sepnt a couple hours in a final attempt to improve the page -- largely by removing irrelevant, redundant, or non-encyclopedic content. I also went, one-by-one, through every single link in the press section. ''Many'' did not include any mention of ICD and very few did anything to speak toward |notability. Please look at Talk:Institute_for_Cultural_Diplomacy#Removed_Press_Section|my write-up on the article talk page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)