Deletion of East Hope Group

Comment: All the information contained in the article is taken from reputable sources providing coverage on an international, national and local level. I have relied on established publications observing and analyzing the aluminium industry, widely circulated English news outlets, major Asian English-language dailies, Chinese news articles, as well as official government publications in Chinese. The article cites multiple independent sources. They are not merely trivial coverage, since they do not simply report meetings, phone numbers, routine notices, etc., as specified in . Below is a run-down on the sources I used
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I can't read through chinese sources either but I had spent some time figuring out notability on the article when it was at afc. I gave it the go through when I found sufficient coverage in reliable sources. I believe that  should not be valid here as a criteria for deletion. If still in doubt, we could request translation of chinese sources (as machine translation isn't reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)