Deletion of Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series

Comment: valid information, stuff people will look for, possible to find publications discussion such enemies(though sourcing the article as it is currently written would be hard).  This smells like a nomination to |prove a point, but I don't know that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Materials from plot must be in articles that have real-world relevance. An article purely on elements from the plot of a game that do not have significant coverage in reliable secondary sources is not notable. See , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:N)

Comment: Purely in-universe content that fails to assert notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: although I'm a Zelda fan). Fact is, this article does not establish its topic's notability, and I cannot see how it will be anything else than a . These enemies are just "there" in the game. You kill them and that's it. They don't further the game's plot. It doesn't matter if you kill a Octorok or a Peahat, the game would still be the same. So you don't need to know about all these enemies to understand what Zelda is about. It would be much better to have one or two sourced paragraphs about these enemies in the gameplay section in the main article than this list. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)