Deletion of Chikara Season 11

Comment: You are very mistaken. Please review this article before commenting and please also root your argument in Wikipedia policy rather than in opinion. This article has more than 10 reliable sources, including news publications, which is 10 more news publications than most pro wrestling articles cite. Those articles that cite no news publications have established that they deserve an article and this article has cited more than 10 news publications and it has also established that it more than deserves an article. As has been stated and has not yet been addressed, this topic was written about in many news publications that are located in not one, but at least eight, different markets (Philadelphia, PA, Lehigh Valley, PA, Berks County, PA, Portland, ME, Strathroy, Ontario, Canada, New York, Chicago, IL, and Lafayette, IN). Most wrestling federations are not even written about in news publications in their home region, and one criterion that Wikipedia uses to establish that a topic deserves an article is that the topic has received regional press. As  states, "Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability." This topic has received more than regional press, in that the news publications in this article are based in at least eight separate markets, including two countries (Canada and the United States). The news publications in this article are considered by Wikipedia to be "independent sources" and "reputable media sources" that are "independent of the topic," and they are writing about the topic "without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter," as  states. These news publications have "no vested interest in" this topic, as  states. These facts show that this topic deserves to have an article about it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:IS)

Comment: Firstly, please |assume good faith and do not assume that "Chikara superfans" are not making a distinction accurately, as nobody has addressed you as a "Chikara anti-fan." Secondly, the assertion that people are misinterpreting this deletion proposal as relating to the deletion of the main CHIKARA article is not accurate, and the distinction is indeed being properly made. Even though BabsChikara accurately responded to your point, that point can also be responded to by the fact that the sources that are used in this article are used only to reference 2012 (season 11) events. For instance, the Press Herald news publication specifically mentions Green Ant as a focal point of CHIKARA, and that is why that news publication is used only as a reference for that. As a second example, the Strathroy Age Dispatch specifically speaks of the Young Lions Cup, and therefore it is only used as a reference for that. These references provide evidence for the importance of CHIKARA in 2012 as opposed to just its general importance, which has already been established. Thirdly,  states that "articles labeled as fancruft" tend to be "unreferenced," and that is clearly not the case with this article. The assertion that this article "is the definition of" or even qualifies as fancruft is not accurate, and even if it is fancruft, which it is not, Wikipedia states that "If you come across fancruft, a kind approach is to assume that the article or topic can be improved." As BabsChikara has stated, this article has been improved and it meets the Wikipedia standards for inclusion for an article. Fourthly, this article simply is not a indiscriminate collection or list of information and it does not resemble the examples that  presents
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:DISCRIMINATE)