Deletion of Persona and reception of Roman Reigns

Comment: this  article and keep the reception section in Reigns' article at its current appropriate size. The never ending overwritten descriptions of his audience reactions and storylines has gone way out of control. As said above, no other wrestler  has this kind of nonsense attached to their articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:CRUFT)

Comment: The failed push of Roman Reigns has been the big story in WWE over the past few years, it's clearly notable enough for . You can draw a direct link between his rejection by fans and the record low ratings WWE is suffering through now. Washington Post even used this situation as an analogy for the 2016 US electionhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/11/11/what-donald-trump-learned-about-politics-from-pro-wrestling/. Separate articles for criticism or public image of individuals are not uncommon. I know this article comes up a lot when we discuss other topics we neglect (including our lacking coverage of Cena's awkward reception) but that's  and shouldn't be considered during deletion discussions. I have always suggested that renaming the article would be an alternative to deletion but I haven't been able to come up with a better name and nobody else has suggest one either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: this is the topic of extensive reporting and clearly passes GNG. At 66kb,  suggests it should probably not be merged with the main article. Like the previous discussion: Talk:Roman_Reigns#Request_for_Comment_on_Proposed_Merge, no policy-based reason for deletion or merge has been offered. Proposal reason appears to be "other stuff doesn't exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZERULE)