Deletion of List of recordings with a prominent flanging effect

Comment: based on Transhumanist arguments and User:Dissolve's citations. Should be renamed to List of recordings with a flanging effect.  The word ''prominent'' is a |weasel word in this instance  (is 15% of the recording "flanged", or 50%?  What makes it ''prominent?'' Is there a threshold?) A vague adjective doesn't belong in the title of an article, IMO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WEASEL)

Comment: there is no possible objective criterion as to whether a flanging effect is "prominent" or not. That in itself would mandate the relocation of this article to List of articles with a flanging effect. However, even with that move the list is still a #DIR|directory of loosely-associated topics. The inclusion of a particular instrument, sound or sound effect in a song does not create any sort of encyclopedic relationship between the songs that include the effect in question. We have deleted any number of similar lists of songs that include particular instruments or sounds
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as original deprodder despite the concerns I raised on the talkpage, and my general dislike of lists. This is a sourced (partially, but the remainder could be sourced by a dedicated editor with a copy of ''The Rough Guide to Music''), interesting and useful list. (Before anyone starts quoting |ATA at me, can I remind them that that's a ''personal essay'' not a policy.) As TTH says, this kind of list is one of the reasons Wikipedia shines while the wannabes fall by the wayside; something that will never be included in Britannica or even Knol, but is potentially very valuable to someone researching the subject. I'm baffled by the use of  as a nomination reason - quite aside from the fact that LC is, again, a personal essay, this is the type of list specifically ''not'' considered as "listcruft" in that essay; Flanging|a parent article exists, and the list would be disproportionately long as part of the parent article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:LISTCRUFT)