Deletion of Science and Christian Belief

Comment: per well-explained nomination.  (I'd add that Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals) is a proposal, not policy, although it forms a helpful guide.  Article still does not meet  though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: or possibly '''Merge''' to Christians in Science. The latter is already pretty |stubby and might benefit from having this material in it. As for the journal, it's been going for 20 years (reaching volume 21), so it's solid (i.e. this is not a journal currently sitting at "volume 1"). I can't find it at the ISI Web of Knowledge — does this have any bearing on its fate? I'd echo the remarks above re: Argument from authority|who the journal has on its editorial board — there are surely better criteria than this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB)

Comment: no indication that it is "notably influential in the world of ideas". This is a good example of why indexing is insufficient to demonstrate notability. There appears to be no coverage beyond that & mentions by related parties -- i.e. no  third party coverage to speak of. Whilst the Victoria Institute was once influential, I see no indication that it has been so for nearly a century (no third party coverage in its article after 1927), or that ''Journal of the Transaction of The Victoria Institute'' (which does not even garner a mention on VI's article) ever had an impact (even if such an impact confers notability to the merged-to journal, which is highly questionable). "Notable, though minor" would appear to be oxymoronic -- notability requires some indication that the journal is non-minor. A merge to Christians in Science would be acceptable, but ''only if'' the indexing-cruft is eliminated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)