Deletion of Kazuo Nagano

Comment: I need to add this for the record: the argument for deletion seems to have been based solely on the lack of sources |currently cited in the article in both English and Japanese. This person and the scandal he was at the heart of, and what happened to him, have received '''extensive''' media coverage, and a '''relative''' lack of recent sources in English is not a valid case for deletion (see ''''). Whether Wikipedia policy justifies the article as it is currently titled, rather than as a section in a theoretical article on the Toyota Shōji scandal is still up in the air, but I say keep because of the precedent set in other independent articles devoted to people who are only notable for having been tragically killed in a particular fashion and those incidents having been covered in the media. The difference is that this person was killed as revenge for having swindled thousands of people out of a huge amount of money, and was already an infamous robber known throughout Japan ''before'' he was killed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NTEMP)