Deletion of Naked Conversations: How Blogs are Changing the Way Businesses Talk with Customers (2nd nomination)

Comment: No merger is needed, It's already in Robert Scoble.   and '''per nom'''. Fleeting references and superficial looks are more of a PR statement. If this book was important enough to warrant a whole article we would have sleus of hard sources. There isn't much to say about this book. No one has even bothered to describe its innards (which is great evidence it was blogfans who jumped on the bad wagon for a week a threw the book out), so it's probably not notable. This is a book you buy when you fly an airplane
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS||WP:BIGNUMBER)

Comment: Definitely notable, and also agree with Warren's above statement. Recommend that nominator reviews |notability guidelines and deletion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I get it, you |don't like it. The fct that no one has added the sources to the article means it needs |fixing, not deleting since the sources exist. I linked to the reviews, not ghits. It doesn't matter where you read or buy the book, if it meets , which this does
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SOFIXIT||WP:BK)