Deletion of SiLA Airlines Flight 42

Comment: with Antonov An-28 and/or the article about the destination airport (which surprisingly doesn't seem to exist). Per long-standing community consensus pursuant to , hull-loss accidents without fatalities go in the airport article and/or the aircraft article. There are plenty of examples on Wikipedia, many involving aircraft much larger than this one with more spectacular damage (e.g. American Airlines Flight 102
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: A regularly scheduled airline flight with passengers crashes resulting in the destruction of the aircraft.  This is not a routine occurrence like a snowstorm in Chicago,  does not apply.  The level of coverage easily meets ... More sources are available on the Russian version of this article, but there is also plenty of English-language coverage, like https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-passenger-plane-goes-missing-siberia-ifax-2021-07-16/ Reuters, https://apnews.com/article/europe-russia-968e121a72568ea1121763a15207598a Associated Press,  https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/safety-ops-regulation/antonov-28-makes-hard-landing-siberia Aviation Week,  https://tass.com/emergencies/1314887 TASS, https://www.yahoo.com/news/russian-passenger-plane-disappeared-siberia-125150510.html Yahoo News, and more than I care to list here.  More sources are likely to develop, since the event only happened a few days ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)