Deletion of Jonathan Glover

Comment: As recent edits to the article show, the subject definitely meets |ACADEMIC (and, now it's properly set out, the publication list is impressive) - though the article can probably be substantially improved if someone now uses the "Further reading" list to help develop it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: per  and , or else significantly improve on the current sources.   (same as ) requires the subject's impact to be substantiated by independent reliable sources, and I'm not impressed either by the current number of sources (two) or their depth (seem to be just passing mentions of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:INDY||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:PROF)