Deletion of Zeppo Network (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom,  ,  and Brianyoumans
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: To show that this article may stay Robertholf, please add to the article references that display that it has been the subject of non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and of each other as per otability. (I could find none, but only after a short search
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Zeppo Network as locally notable; '''Redirect''' all of the rest and Zeppo Awards (another part of this walled garden) to Zeppo Network as they fail  and dont demonstrate notability.  I am particularly worried about these articles being  and would like to see one or two of those articles be deleted rather than redirected, in order to prevent undue PageRank influence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPAM)

Comment: I appreciate the cautious sentiment about a new post and the constructive direction I was previously steered.  I am however now growing weary of the unjustifiably elitist mentality shown by Brianyoumans.  In rebuttal, I would hardly call Biz Journal (Pacific Business News) an obscure publication.  Admittedly, we have done much in the way of paid advertisement in large state magazines but I have not listed that here.  Articles were written on me by both the Pacific Edge and InMagazine due to the fact that they found my vision and success '''notable'''.  Nothing which was posted was driven by a sales agenda.  The content posted is factual and unbiased.  The fact that The Zeppo Network provides research and development on search engine technology and offers a content management system is not something which should be looked down upon.  Fact is we have turned down a substantial buyout offer, we own the largest market share in the state of Hawaii and have two rapidly growing regional sales offices now in California and Florida.  The only point which I feel is valid is the fact that I posted the content with a username which was not made up.  Had I posted the content from various fake accounts we would not be having this discussion.  To remedy this situation, I have asked my employees, my pr firm, my friends and my enemies to become active on these posts to alleviate the .  Over the next 24 hours there will be numerous posts by previously named sources which I hope proves to satisfy you all.  I honestly feel the post adds valuable content and am open to suggestions on methods for solidifying my companies place here.  Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: There are clearly  issues that need to be addressed, but that does not necessarily make it non-notable.  I would encourage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)