Deletion of Photon Belt (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm just not seeing the case that this stands out as a noteworthy bit of pseudoscience. It ''might'' merit a paragraph or so in another article, but that text should be written from scratch, given the problematic history and  concerns of the content here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: or REDIRECT to 2012_phenomenon#Other_catastrophes. Not enough  independent coverage to justify a stand alone article. What coverage there is https://books.google.com/books?id=XdEKQyuf_LoC&pg=PA95&dq=%22Photon+belt%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPm4DdtOThAhVMUt8KHTNSAYkQ6AEILjAB#v=onepage&q=%22Photon%20belt%22%20-wikipedia&f=false ties this belief to the 2012 phenomenon. (I'm not sure what other sources existed during the 2011 AfD, but I don't see 'em currently
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRIND)

Comment: per , and . I hate gaming the system
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS||WP:SALT)

Comment: per  and . This was a gaming of Wikipedia. If someone wants to workshop a new article using es that are properly ed, let them. But better to start from scratch. Nothing worth saving in this incarnation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:DENY||WP:RS||WP:WEIGHT)