Deletion of List of female military historians

Comment: honestly when I saw https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_female_military_historians&oldid=794890505 this a while ago I thought I'd be in favour of deletion per  mostly. But the subject has received significant commentary in reliable sources, so that's a clear pass of . The rest of the issues can be address through regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  in that the group has been the subject of significant coverage https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/sep/30/julia-lovel-author-authorhttps://www.nam.ac.uk/whats-on/5x15-talks-women-military-historyhttps://search.proquest.com/openview/c1f63a803930450bab7a1f553c50b9a4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=32579http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/article-2479096/The-History-Girls-meet-women-building-bright-future-past.htmlhttps://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SbEyAQAAQBAJ&dq=women+military+historians&source=gbs_navlinks_s. Women in traditionally male-dominated scholarly fields (i.e. all of them) are frequently notable, and we have many similar lists, e.g. List of women linguists, List of women classicists, List of women botanists. Based on some quick spot checks I think the majority of the entries could be blue-linked, so while better sourcing would be nice, it isn't strictly necessary. If kept it should be moved (back) to List of women military historians, because it's a list of people not lab specimens. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Despite the sources Joe pointed to, I don't think the subject is generally notable. The list of names overwhelmingly contain NN entries and is largely unsourced. I don't think it makes sense to keep this article at this stage in the game; if anything, this is a good  opportunity for another editor to start over from scratch. There are too few NN entries to excuse a category, either. Wikipedia needs a list of :Category:Women historians|woman historians before a list of women in the sub-field of military history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per Joe, Nick, etc. Clearly a notable topic, and as for the suggestion to move to project space, . If the topic is notable and the article is not irretrievably broken, there's no reason to move it out of main space
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)