Deletion of Burrs Mill Lake

Comment: per MB and Alansohn. It seems I did not understand  correctly, apparently more verifiable content besides just basic statistics and coordinates is needed as MB explained above. Due to my mistake I crossed out the obviously mistaken portions of my earlier Keep vote, please disregard the portions I crossed out. Burrs Mill Brook Reservoir does indeed exist while Burrs Mill Lake does not, and Doncram did the right thing by renaming it to the right name, but existing is not enough to make it notable. At least it got renamed to the correct name so we could debate whether or not Burrs Mill Brook Reservoir is notable or not. It seems it is not in fact notable. I looked into  again, reading the text carefully, as well as taking what MB said about its meaning into account, and it became immediately apparent to me that MB was right and I had been wrong. Thus I have crossed out my earlier vote and am in total agreement with MB. I thank MB for educating me on this matter with such a good explanation of what that policy means and how it applies in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO||WP:NGEO)

Comment: Even properly named as Burrs Mill Brook Reservoir, I see no indication it is notable. I disagree with the above synopsis of . NGEO says features '''CAN''' be notable '''IF''' "enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article..." "beyond statistics and coordinates." I haven't found anything beyond routine directory type listings. The best is https://www.hookandbullet.com/fishing-burrs-mill-brook-reservoir-leisuretowne-nj/ this one which only adds that it is 3.5 miles from somewhere else and doesn't even know what species of fish can be caught there. Just not enough to support an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)