Deletion of Quinn Fawcett

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: A Kirkus review is no more a sign of notability than a PW one. Both are trade journals. Both review a lot of authors. Both accept payment. Throwing a statement out there how one is another weak point in Wolfowitz's analysis, particularly, "there's a pretty-well-established consensus via many prior AFD discussions that multiple PW reviews strongly signal notability," which is ''neither here nor there'' with this discussion, and "GScholar even turns up a few hits in academic journals," yet another limp towards clearing the hurtle of notability. I'm afraid it falls short. And, for the record, my response to tokyogirls' "comment" refutes her "argument." Going back to BlueSalixs' original post, this author does not meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Doesn't meet  criteria. It's worth noting that Bill Fawcett, I believe, is the one who made the comment on the board. "Quinn Fawcett" is the apparent name of the "team" or "writing duo" of Chelsea Quinn Yarbro and Bill Fawcett. The former also fails to clear the hurtle of notability as well, but that's a different page perhaps. Anyhow, not much coverage (substantial, something other than standard PW review, etc.) for his books or him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I can't find any mention of the volume of a writer's output lending anything to credibility via . For the record, I think the argument of "Author X has written and published ''so'' many books, he is by default notable" a weak argument. Moreover, the issue isn't that a review in the NY Times Book Review is "meatier" than one in Kirkus, it's that the NY Times Book Review is a stronger source. That it has a better reputation. Been around longer. Has earned a better reputation. Has a better readership. That kind of stuff. Also, another thing for the record, it's excessive to list ''every'' book an author has published, especially if they are prolific, because, generally, there's a risk of veering into , and lastly, reading some comments on the AfD lately, I have to say, (borrowed from elsewhere), ''words are like leaves and where they most abound, much fruit of sense is rarely found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:RESUME)