Deletion of NCircle network security

Comment: leaning towards, at least) i added 1 link showing who founded the company, and wikilinked all mentions of nCircle to this article. unfortunately, its not much, and the ''Business Insider'' ref is NOT in the top 100, but specifically one of the businesses THEY didnt know enough about. so, if Business Insider ever does get enough info to list them in a top 100, i would say recreate without prejudice. This business may in fact be more notable or even important than some other similar businesses, but i have to go with what we have on them thats confirmable. to saidkassem:  explains why your main argument all alone is invalid (though the arguments about the size of the business are somewhat compelling). if another article here doesnt meet notability, improve it or call for its deletion. If i could create articles based on fact that since each pokemon character has its own...well, i need to watch my blood pressure on that comment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: not notable per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The company appears to fail  for lack of significant coverage by |multiple independent reliable sources. A search of Google News Archive found mostly press releases (including some items that appeared in apparently reliable sources such as Reuters, but were disclaimed by Reuters as press releases). I did find one item from http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/PCWorld/story?id=3202918 ABC News about the company acquiring another company but this does not amount to multiple significant coverage. BTW the claim at the article, that the company was listed as one of Business Insider's "100 most valuable private companies in the world," is not supported by the reference provided. http://www.businessinsider.com/digital-100-revised-the-most-valuable-private-companies-in-the-world-2012-11 Business Week said they didn't have enough information about the company to evaluate it, and in any case, that listing was not of the "most valuable private companies in the world" - it was "the most valuable private '''digital''' companies in the world." This sort of exaggeration does not speak well for the good faith of the article's creator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:42)