Deletion of ERCIM

Comment: Neither of these two !votes seem to have any basis in policy and fly in the face of , despite the inventive reasoning given by Lambiam
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Despite the evident notability of many of its members, I'm not seeing any sign that the umbrella group is itself notable under either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability is not ''automatically'' inherited. But note that, for example, ,  and  all allow, under certain conditions, for inherited notability.  states: "not every organization to which a notable person belongs ... is itself notable", and by analogy we are led to infer that "not every consortium to which a notable organization belongs is itself notable". But in the case of ERCIM, it is not a matter of just ''a'' notable organization belonging to it; the ''majority'' of organizations in this consortium are notable. &nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:NFILM||WP:NMUSIC||WP:NOTINHERITED)