Deletion of List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2013

Comment: per . Unfortunately, rocket attacks against Israel are a routine occurrence, and documenting every one of them is beyond the scope of a general encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: although each event can be cited to a reliable source,  comes to mind. It's unfortunate that these rocket attacks have almost become |routine, but it appears to be the case. The content can be merged in a summarized form of prose in a related article like Palestinian rocket attacks on_Israel#2013, or elsewhere, but is there really a need to document each and every attack in a list? If so, then since we can verify each servicemember and contractor killed during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, we should have those lists as well; yet, I remember that those were deleted
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: That a dysfunctional tilt in wiki articles like this exists is the main problem. I see nothing wrong with such lists, save for the fact that (a) it is relatively easy to main-source attacks on Israel -they get intense coverage abroad, but quite difficult to find RS for attacks where Palestinians or their infrastructure are casualties (). We are deleting en masse the Palestinian articles, but none of the Israeli articles will lose out in the Adf process. (b) the Israel/victim pages show the vice of using 'Palestinians' instead of 'Palestinian militant'. (Imagine the obverse, if one wrote 'Israelis' bombed a Palestinian refugee camp' etc. It's the IDF that does that, a group or institution. That usage is a clear violation of , involving ethnic stereotyping and collective blame. (This article also adds shameful colour by mentioning Shavuot festivities being disturbed by 'Palestinians' etc). The answer is to have articles representing the comparable lists for both sides 'Israeli/Palestinian attacks' per year, astringently neutral. Otherwise articles on this from neither side should be permitted, since they are  being abused by image-manipulation, and this one looks like anything you can  get out of an Israeli government website
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:systemic bias)

Comment: Well, I'm unininvoled, too, and I don't see why there can't be encyclopedic coverage of this topic.  The nom says that the article is a "''tad one-sided; deleting the Israeli attacks while leaving the Palestinian ones.''"  Then simply create an article about such attacks, or merge the two together.  The nom says that this is a "''list of non-notable events''".  Individual items on a list need not be independently notable.  See .  The nom says, "''Wikipedia is not a place for delineating every single rocket fired in a conflict.''"  If editors want more stricter inclusion criteria, this can be worked out on the talk page.  The nom says that there is, "''precious little coverage in the article from non-Israeli or non-Palestinian sources.''"  I'm not sure if they mean the article suffers from a bias of Israeli and Palestinian sources, or they are trying to say that the rest of the world doesn't think that this important.  Either way, that's not a valid reason to delete the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)