Deletion of Vagina envy (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Edison; the article does seem to satisfy  and  (although not by too much yet). I agree that the article just needs an expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:N)

Comment: Merger with Penis envy makes no sense. The article now has three references wherein the topic has received substantial coverage in refereed scientific journals, satisfying  and . There is clearly room for improvement by rewriting the present stub to incorporate more content from the sources cited as DGG said
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:N)