Deletion of William Martin (garden designer)

Comment: Just to be clear in case of  that I had never heard of WM before 5 December, but I ''did'' do some work on it after it came up for nomination as I thought he seemed like an interesting chap. I'm not withdrawing "keep" but closing admin might want to take my involvement into account when evaluating my contribution to this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: As per above, subject cited in ''The Garden'', Jan 2005; ''House and Garden'', May 2004; and ''Better Homes and Gardens (Australia)'', Dec 2002.  This meets the brightline for .  As
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Just searched Wigandia. Plenty of material out there to justify an article. For example http://www.abc.net.au/gardening/stories/s1724217.htm Whether he wants the page here isn't an issue as long as we respect . That said the article as it stands has very obvious POV issues. Articles that refer to their subject by their given name are annoying so I'm changing that. Won't affect AfD but will irritate me less
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Passes . The subject not wanting the article to exist is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)