Deletion of Bill Ayers election controversy

Comment: If this article hasn't already, it has the serious potential to turn into a , , and have Guilt By Association problems.  If it is decided to keep it, then it should be strictly monitored to keep it  as those who are "crusading for truth" and adding any and every minor criticism of Barack Obama to show the readers the "truth", will continue to try to twist this into a negative POV/ attack on Obama
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:COATRACK||WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: The matter of Obama's past association with Ayers has been a campaign issue and is likely to continue to be, if only as background rumblings.  I may personally think that it's a prime example of a guilt-by-association smear, but it's a guilt-by-association smear that has been covered in reliable sources and as such deserves to be given encyclopedic treatment.  I suggest that active editors review #Criticism and praise, in particular the bits about balance and structure; the article could perhaps be reorganized to give more weight to the views of experts familiar with the Ayerses in Chicago.  But that's not an argument for deletion.  (Incidentally, I agree that the current title is awful and should be changed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: It is clearly a  article. Please stop analysing the nominator and the reasons why it might have been nominated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)