Deletion of Myrcella Baratheon (2nd nomination)

Comment: It is easy to find sources which discuss the topic in detail such as ''https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/2017/06/12/gruesome-game-thrones-death-viewers-never-shown/ The gruesome Game of Thrones death viewers were never shown'' or ''https://screenrant.com/game-thrones-myrcella-actor-recast-reason/ Why Myrcella Baratheon Was Recast''.  The subject therefore passes  and our policy  applies.  Note also that the page gets substantial readership – up to 5000 per day – and, as its title is quite distinctive, this demonstrates a significant level of interest which is best satisfied with a separate page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: WP:NTEMP applies to this article: once a subject is notable, it remains notable (even long after interest wanes). The main consideration regarding notability as it relates to the subject is found in the  policy (reliable sources exist). I am unaware of any  regarding retaining an article based on the number of views the article may receive in the future. The article easily passes  with multiple 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:POLICY||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: to List of ASoIaF characters - Probably resulting from being a minor character in both the  books and TV series, I can't find any independent sources about the character, apart from a https://screenrant.com/game-thrones-myrcella-actor-recast-reason/ ScreenRant article about why Myrcella was recast (and failed to provide an answer) and a few articles about why her death wasn't that violent. This shows to me that the subject of this article does not meet  by a long shot
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)