Deletion of List of best-charting music artists in the United States

Comment: per nomination and . It’s best to track these things at their individual articles, where the info is in a manageable state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: An interesting (if incomplete) statistical exercise, but it does not pass . Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per . Also poorly sourced and lacks any criteria as Metropolitan90 stated. Also due to the long amount of time this article has existed and not been improved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: I must agree with the  argument, as "best charting" is an unclear term. The list article does not define the term sufficiently nor does it include any criteria for how far the list will go. Under its own design, the only way for this list to make sense is to include every artist who ever charted, and that is both unwieldy and unnecessary. The List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones article does a much better job at a similar task
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: per  the list is informational and aides in navigation. The list is not indiscriminate in that it is focussed on (best-charting music artists in the U.S
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per  and . Majority of this content is not verifiable. I also disagree with the previous commentor describing the article as useful for navigation. It's useful for almost nothing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTIINFO||WP:NOR)