Deletion of Dinosaur (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: I think there may be a general misunderstanding that a mention on a fansite or a passing reference in a third party publication is a reliable secondary source, when in fact they are nothing of the kind. Evidence that these D&D monsters have notability outside of its primary source (a role playing game) needs to be shown by "|real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development, impact or historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot". As this article is composed of Wikipedia:Waf#The_problem_with_in-universe_perspective|in universe #PLOT|plot summary, sources that support the in universe content do not provide of notabilty
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:NOT)

Comment: I agree, this article fails #GUIDE. Although this article has got |secondary sources, it has none that demonstrate the |notability of a single dinosaur in the Dungeons & Dragons canon. As the article itself says, "Some of the dinosaurs used in D&D...are real ones which used to exist on earth". No wonder, as real dinosaurs have notability and the argument that D&D ones have inherited this notability is unproven
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:FICT)