Deletion of Descendants of Queen Victoria and King Christian IX (2nd nomination)

Comment: the subject of this article is in fact not arbitrary nor does it violate .  From Theo Aronson's ''A Family of Kings
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: While there is some good information in this article; there is no reason for this article to exist ''per se''.  Since Victoria and Christian IX never actually did the horizontal hokey-pokey (as far as I know), there are no decendents of them both in any real sense.  There a people who have decendend from Victoria and from Christian IX, but to have an article like this implies something entirely different than the coincidence of several people sharing two ancestors.  This article is a clear novel synthesis as defined by .  This is in the sense that while it is clear that all of these people are in fact descended from Victoria and from Christian IX, there is no reason for these two facts to be assembled into a single article.  This information has no reason to be conjoined in a single article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I nominated this for deletion less than a month ago, and am gladly arguing for its deletion once again. As I said then, this is a violation of , in that the "article" is merely an overwhelming series of royals, whose only tenuous link is one of two common ancestors, and of , because no third-party references have been provided to establish the notability of the multitude of descendants had by Queen Victoria and King Christian IX. I stand by that assertion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:SYN)