Deletion of Mariko Okubo

Comment: per above accurate analysis and links, passes ,  and . As mentioned above, Chinese WP lists several RS about the subject, and   requires that sources are available, not that they are used in the an article. AfD is not cleanup, and being unsourced or Wikipedia:UGLY|in poor shape is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR||WP:NRVE)

Comment: There are plenty of sources in Japanese media: http://wpb.shueisha.co.jp/2012/06/11/11944/, http://jisin.jp/serial/%E5%A5%B3%E5%BA%A6UP/beauty/10550, http://www.taipeinavi.com/special/5053198, http://trend01.net/?p=816, http://taiwanentertainment.info/?p=869, http://weekly.ascii.jp/elem/000/000/010/10072/, etc. I even got one in Chinese as I searched Japanese sources: http://www.ettoday.net/news/20130215/164098.htm. Passes , but certainly such sources need to be inserted in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)