Deletion of Sean Kennedy (musician)

Comment: I reviewed the singer's article for the Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers|New Pages Patrol and found it to have potential, but also placed the "additional sources" and "fan's point of view" notices to encourage folks to improve it. Some sources have since been added but I agree with the nominator's reasoning. The singer's article is surely an attempted |promotion written from a fan's point of view, with non-encyclopedic tidbits like the names of his brothers or what school he want to. None of that is |notable or |verifiable in reliable sources. The single and album have not been noticed by the general public, and all sources are either self-created social media or routine listings of the basic |existence of the singer and his releases. Good luck to the kid but an encyclopedia article is not warranted until he receives viable coverage by someone other than himself and his fans
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:NMUSICIAN||WP:SIGCOV||WP:EXIST)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: All of the nominated pages fall under the policy , specifically {{tq|Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion}} (PROMO). Moving the articles to mainspace after AfC rejection suggests a certain ''insistence'', but admittedly it is impressive that a brand new editor figured how to properly apply fair use rationales to uploaded images
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTPROMO)