Deletion of Light (fantasy)

Comment: None of them are independent sources meeting  discussing the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: after editing, with a related article -- video game content can certainly be encyclopedia-worthy if there are sufficient quality sources, but linking multiple threads together under the unifying theme of "light" may not be enough. Consider the guidelines at , the advisory essay at , and the essay at , all of which have some bearing on this article. (https://xkcd.com/446/ Also this xkcd.) What really distinguishes these things besides their being "light"? Are there other treatments of "light" in scholarly texts, video game industry articles, literary criticism or media commentary? I suggest kicking a draft around with the folks who specialize in this sort of stuff, maybe Wikipedia:Articles for creation or somewhere like that. I will note that, at the very least, the formatting of this article is quite good, so you've at least got the mechanics of editing down, which is nice
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:CRUFT||WP:POPCULTURE)

Comment: as ; agree that any proposition for merge / redirect falls at the atrget stall. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a dictionary. A dictionary lists multiple meanings of a word under a single heading; an encyclopedia has separate entries for different concepts. Most of these topics are already covered in other articles: Black-and-white dualism, White#Associations and symbolism, White magic, and for individual franchises The Force (Star Wars), Character class (Dungeons & Dragons), Might and Magic VI: The Mandate of Heaven, etc. (Draftify would be fine, as long as it's reshaped into different articles; I don't think a redirect is suitable unless others believe it a likely search term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT)