Deletion of Zoe Yin

Comment: Despite the filibustering from other editors saying page was evidently created by a | single-purpose editor who very likely has a  | conflict of interest, i.e. Zoe's mom? in creating this article. I don't buy it. I would worry less about this if the article subject were she were older and in the adult movie industry. Please keep for now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:COI)

Comment: Some of the sources are unreliable, but between the reliable sources currently cited and what I'm seeing with even a cursory search, there's sufficient coverage to pass . She's been interviewed on Chinese television multiple times, it appears, and featured in other seemingly reliable video sources like THNKR. For print sources, between what ''is'' cited and reliable (China Daily, CNTV, a couple local papers, a magazine profile..) and the uncited sources I found in a matter of a couple minutes (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/17/blessed-or-cursed-child-prodigies-reveal-all.html Daily Beast, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-237746462.html Art Business News 1 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-237746461.html 2 (via HighBeam), http://blogs.psychcentral.com/creative-mind/2012/10/does-creativity-have-an-expiration-date/ PsychCentral/The Creative Mind, http://www.visualnews.com/2012/11/08/child-prodigy-sisters-astonish-the-art-world/ Visual News -- in decreasing order of reliability, I suppose), it appears to me that sufficient sources exist to justify inclusion on  grounds. That's further strengthened by the fact that several sources appear to be Chinese and thus behind a language barrier. --&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)