Deletion of Valeria Lukyanova

Comment: She has become quite the internet sensation:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/22/valeria-lukyanova_n_1444169.htmlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2133552/Valeria-Lukyanova-pictures-Real-life-Barbie-seeks-worlds-convincing-doll.htmlhttp://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/23/the-real-life-ukrainian-barbie-doll/http://www.perthnow.com.au/lifestyle/real-life-barbie-doll-valeria-lukyanova-has-become-and-internet-sensation/story-e6frg3pl-1226338852758http://jezebel.com/5904103/ukrainian-model-has-supposedly-barbified-herself-through-plastic-surgery and many more hits.  Going purely by coverage she might pass , but it's hard to say that this is really encyclopedic content - is she a participant in a news event? a celebrity? an internet meme? someone who'll be entirely forgotten next week
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Typical knee-jerk inclusionism that completely ignores .  This women is an otherwise non-notable, non-public individual who is being gossiped about for a single issue, her unusual appearance.  Many, many articles of this nature ("woman who walks into mall pool while texting", "man fired for drunken airplane rant") that had a hell of a lot more coverage than this person have been deleted in the past.  A ballsy closer would discard the invalid !votes that do not address 1E policy and toss this article out on its ear.  We'll see
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I see sources at the bottom, and I think it qualifies the |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)