Deletion of Trashy Bags

Comment: The nominator has rightly pointed out that at least two people involved with the organisation have been heavily involved in editing the article (something I missed earlier), and also that the article is currently in a fairly lousy state. However, that doesn't change the fact that the organisation is unequivocally notable according to  even based on the coverage in reliable sources already listed in the article. Does it deserve to be noted by these major independent reliable sources with such ease? Maybe not, but it has been so noted, it is notable, that's all there is to it. (Full disclosure - as part of my activities helping new editors, I either helped the unpaid COI guy upload the company logo, or I uploaded it for him. I might also have advised him on how to format refs, or something like that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While I agree with the nominator's concern over COI, the reality is that the notability of a subject is not affected by who is creating or editing its article. We have ways of dealing with advert-like language, puffery, undue weight, etc. And COI itself. This passes  as far as I'm concerned. As a side note, conflict of interest issues are no different from poor spelling, grammar or crappy structure when |determining when to bring an article to AFD - they shouldn't be factors at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:BEFORE)