Deletion of Incidents at Walt Disney World Resort

Comment: Incidents at theme parks will always happen for a number of reasons, one of these are the carelessness of its passengers...this is why a notice exists for them to read before they ride. Do we need a forever list of trivial incidents. In short, Wikipedia is |not a collection of random news clippings nor it is an |indiscriminate collection of theme park incidents. May I suggest these to be nominated for deletion below.Incidents at Cedar Fair parksIncidents at PARC Management parksIncidents at Disneyland ResortIncidents at Six Flags parksIncidents at SeaWorld parksIncidents at independent parksIncidents at European parksIncidents at Universal parks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:IINFO)

Comment: Agreed that  WikiNews, where more complete coverage should be provided on individual incidents, but there are Amusement park accidents articles that summarize the overall topic of how incidents are reported etc -- the various company-broken out incident articles provide additional detail in a single place without having the info scattered across all the related ride/attraction/park articles. When looked at completely, an incidents summary (note - these are SUMMARIES and not intended to provide ALL incident details...such as victim names... that one would find in a news article or WikiNews) can be used to determine if an individual park/company is providing adequate safety precautions, or if there is a safety trend being followed.  In addition, all items are sourced with WP-valid 3rd-party references. There are guidelines in use by the page editors to determine what is an incident to be included (injury/death for sure, or one that significantly impacts park operations) or not (a man fell off a parking lot tram
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The nomination is convincing. |Wikipedia is not a news aggregator of the type "read about every single minor incident that ever happened at X". The "keep" opinions are unconvincing. Sourcing is a necessary, not a sufficient requirement for inclusion (see ). The "Wikipedia is not censored" argument does not apply because it is not proposed to delete this article on account of any moral or political objections against the ''content'', but simply because it is a ''type of information'' not suited for an encyclopedia on account of its triviality and indiscriminateness. A succinct summary and statistic of incidents should be part of the main article instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IINFO)

Comment: While the contents of this list could be trimmed down a bit to highlight only the most significant incidents, major incidents and deaths at Walt Disney World enjoy |enduring, nationwide coverage in the United States (see http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,962597,00.html 1, http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/08/18/florida.disney.death/index.html?iref=allsearch 2, http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/07/09/florida.disney.crash/index.html?iref=allsearch 3, http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/06/30/coaster.death/index.html?iref=allsearch 4, http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/04/14/disneyworld.death/index.html?iref=allsearch 5, http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/15/disney.death/index.html?iref=allsearch 6, http://travel.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/travel/31disney.html?scp=14 7). As a top tourist destination and seemingly safe and controlled environment, Walt Disney World enjoys a special scrutiny when it comes to incidents that would be regarded as trivial in other contexts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)