Deletion of List of works with the subtitle "Virtue Rewarded"

Comment: Funny, delightful, but alas seems to me to fail  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOR)

Comment: per .  No, it probably doesn't qualify by usual modern Wikipedia standards, and it certainly shouldn't be used as a precedent it's okay to create new spinoff articles for whatever bizarre subtitle tracking some editor wants to do.  That said, it's harmless and quirky on its own and seems to be a rare case of "original research" producing something interesting, so keep as a small shrine to the Wikipedia of 2004 that was going to be an Internet-curated database of everything.  A ''small'' amount of such silliness on Wikipedia is fine and harmless; the dose makes the poison, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: does not meet , bah! humbug
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: fails  although fairly amusing and remarkable that this has lasted so long
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per Floquenbeam's https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/wistful#:~:text=One%20way%20to%20describe%20the,something%20had%20gone%20differently%20%E2%80%94%20these wistful look back to a time when editors had a https://genius.com/Neil-young-rockin-in-the-free-world-electric-lyrics "kinder gentler machine gun hand". But more importantly this is a legitimate list per  {{tq|Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists.}} The list certainly provides information and has some navigation usefulness. Also as AleatoryPonderings has shown us: https://www.google.ca/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22virtue+rewarded%22+subtitle, is a distinct phenomenon in its own right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per the rationales of most of those who commented at the previous two AFD's (which for some reason aren't weren't mentioned here (they are now)). I wish it was still 2004, when all the quirkiness hadn't been relentlessly sucked out of the place, and a bunch of smart and witty and clever people (I even saw Geogre's name in the history, which brought a brief smile to my face) could create something for the sheer joy of creating it.  I know, I know, even Bish has never supported keeping it.  I know, I know,   and  and |WP:NOFUNALLOWED and lots of other bluelinks. I know, I know, we are an ever so much more serious encyclopedia than we were back then.  I know, I know, this is going to get deleted this time.  But when sociologists of the future study the rapid loss of fun and joy and personality in Wikipedia between around 2007 and 2020, I hope they note that, although the drop in support for this article between the AFD of 2007 and this one was stark, there was still one lone holdout even in darkest 2020
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOT)

Comment: This fails  as there are no sources that actually discuss this grouping or phenomenon as a set.  There are certainly some sources on some of the ''individual'' pieces mentioned here, but there are none that discuss the concept as a whole, making the grouping complete .  Even the creator of the article has admitted as such here.  All of the keep votes here are referencing Floquenbeam's comment, but that comment does not cite any relevant policy nor provide any relevant sources, and is an entirely an  comment, making these completely invalid arguments.  They also keep citing the previous two discussions, but looking at those, none of the Keep votes in either of them actually provided any relevant arguments either - they're a mixture of  and  posts, none of which actually provide evidence that there are sources that would help this pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:OR||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:LISTN)