Deletion of Rhonda Nanette McEwen

Comment: We again have confusion on , which requires substantive info ''on'' or ''about'' the subject, not brief quotes in a story that is actually about something else. The above all seem to be of the latter type, e.g. http://www.sfweekly.com/2010-08-11/news/ihelp-for-autism/3/ ''"With the iPod, for the first time, he was able to demonstrate that he did understand," McEwen says''. In essence, there was a fleeting media buzz on using the iPad in education and McEwen was quoted/appeared in a number of stories. None of them were about her, so there is clearly no basis for . She is a professor, though, and here she might satisfy the distinctly different requirements. However, in checking, you find this is not the case. For example, her research on the socio-educational aspects of technology only has http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Rhonda+McEwen%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C26&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 6 total GS citations (h-index 1). She is a newly-minted PhD and clearly does not satisfy any of the other parts of  either. Most of the sources seem to be her own CV or personal web page. The page history indicates that this page was started as a freshman class project by user whose http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Sherry.yuchengr&namespace=0&tagfilter=&year=&month=-1 only single edit in the entirety of the article namespace was to create this page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:Prof is certainly not achieved and there doesn't seem to be enough material for . Also clear 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COI)