Deletion of Jobster

Comment: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jobster&diff=904808714&oldid=904736919 Sufficient sources exist to meet . Please review . Re: content, formatting, etc, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: per , though a sudden rush of media coverage might not help the cause and the article with get deleted -- I mean fired. Chronic and consistent media coverage is good, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Despite the Keep !votes above, not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. "Sufficient sources exist" is not mentioned in the guidelines and is invalid as a reason - volume of references has no bearing on establishing notability if those references fail the criteria. The references added invariably are mentions-in-passing or fail  as they are based on company announcements or interviews. Similarly, "significant coverage in major newspapers" is demonstrably untrue since none of the coverage is "significant" but more importantly all the references either fails  or  (or both). Finally, "chronic and consistent media coverage" is also not part of the guidelines.  Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The references in the article fail. Topic therefore fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Please read both  *and*  for references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. None of the articles you reference meet these criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)