Deletion of Janet Mason

Comment: How is this in-universe, and what guidelines doesn't she pass? For starters, she passes  ''and'' . '''Erpert
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: if this is covered by , that only shows how ridiculously out of touch that "guideline" is with the rest of the project. People keep debating whether or not it is currently deprecated, but somebody gave a good answer to that on a similar Afd: it is precisely as deprecated as AfD participants decide it is. This very debate here, and several others, clearly demonstrate it currently has no consensus behind it, so it can be safely ignored
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: As with the others, PORNBIO is insufficient grounds when cited as the sole ground to keep an article.  Even worse here though is that in the past porn blp discussions, nominations for shared/group awards are deemed insufficient.  If Ms. Mason's bio can't even meet the technicalities of ''that'' low-lying fruit of , this is like a double-delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)