Deletion of Glasya-Labolas

Comment: The existing reference meets  on a quick search I find this as well as several other references in books prior to 1970.  While they are mostly minor, they support  as for  there are multiple hits in modern books.  Many of these are essentially the same as the 1904 work and/or Wikipedia. As for the statement "''no reliable sourcing of actual interactions with demons.''" I am not sure what is meant by this, historical or modern, in any case, searching for reliable references to any spirt one does not believe in, is problematic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of demons in the Ars Goetia - While some of the 72 Goetia demons are notable enough, with enough coverage, to have their own articles, this one really is not.  The source being used in the article is just a translation of the original The Lesser Key of Solomon, and pretty much every other source out there is just a reiteration of the same piece of information from that original text.  The entirety of the contents of this article is already present on the main list, as well, so I am not really seeing a reason to have this also be  out into an individual article on top of that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)