Deletion of Lori Klausutis (third nomination)

Comment: Then write '''that''' article.  However I suspect it is only worth one paragraph in the article on each those who sought to abuse her name or death, and those who were the objects of the defamation.  Her biography fails  and thus has no place here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: to Joe Scarborough:  Under , she's notable only (if at all) for the accusations that Joe Scarborough killed her, however, under , this level of coverage is grossly inappropriate, especially since there's no evidence that the rumor is true.  The one paragraph on this subject in Joe Scarborough is more than enough to meet any encyclopedic need
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP)

Comment: I believe your logic to be flawed.  If it is about Scarborough, then it is right for it to be in Scarborough's article.  If you want an article about the abuse of her good name, then it should be in an article about that abuse.  In neither case does it have a place in this lady;s biography, which remains wholly non notable in our terms.  She fails ; as such her article, her ''biographical article'' should go.  As for expunging the information, if placed in a correct article, and if it is in itself notable and verifiable, then it stays.  If not then it goes.  We do not change the rules because this is thought by some to be a special case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The only issue at question here is notability.  #Non-public_figures does not apply.  The Moore actions, Scarborough talking about it on Imus, the Vanity Fair article and subsequent apology, and the fact that Katherine Harris recently mentioned it to potential campaign donors which warranted coverage in the Miami Herald all support notability. As long as the page sticks to facts and makes clear that Scarborough was not found to be guilty of anything involving the death, which it does seem to do at the moment, it should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: At Talk:Lori_Klausutis#The_sole_valid_content|The article talk page I have "rewritten" the article as it should be to reflect just Klausutis.  This shows precisely how she fails .  The "rewritten" article contains just the facts, and is wholly inappropriate to be here.  The current article has a load of irrelevant material which has no place in her article should it be judged to be keepable (Lordy I so hope not).  Just to put it into perspective, I was also, like Scarborough, "not in Florida" when the poor lady died.  But I don't merit a mention in this article either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)