Deletion of Paul Conneally (2nd nomination)

Comment: In terms of criteria the development of thought / theory around haibun particularly in the referenced good secondary source of the paper on http://www.poetrymagazines.org.uk/magazine/record.asp?id=17225 Developing Schools of Haibun published by British Haiku Society notability is met and reinforced by the references to his definition of haibun in Contemporary Haibun Online. Also here http://haibuntoday.blogspot.com/2007/12/haibun-defined-anthology-of-haibun.html
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I proposed the original AfD on the basis of lack of notability, not lack of info or references. It would help persuade me (and I believe other editors) if those who advocate a keep specified where in this raft of new info and refs the notability lies, ''with reference specifically to  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE)