Deletion of Fire lizard

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per  not being a valid reason for deletion, especially when as shown above the subject is |verified in numerous |reliable sources.  "http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&q=%22fire%20lizard%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp Fire Lizard" also appears as the title of books, etc. so whether the article should be about these specific ones, there is clearly enough sources for an article on some kind of fire lizards and as such no reason to red link here.  For example, Salamander derives from a Greek word for "http://books.google.com/books?id=_vw2sIvJcvcC&pg=PA137&dq=%22Fire+lizard%22&lr=&ei=8IolSp7TC42ozQTEz-TwBg#PPA138,M1 fire-lizard" (see also http://books.google.com/books?id=0ekMgWOMQJ8C&pg=PA51&dq=%22Fire+lizard%22&lr=&ei=rYslSpLYBZGuzQT-g5HiBg), ''http://books.google.com/books?id=AQGrAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Fire+lizard%22&dq=%22Fire+lizard%22&lr=&ei=Y4slStvNCKCIzQSK-tWnBw&pgis=1 Fire Lizard'' is the title of a book of poems.  Now the idea of Salamanders as "fire lizards" is indeed discussed in who the concept has been perceived in myths/fiction as well, as seen http://books.google.com/books?id=14xJnha1F_QC&pg=PA118&dq=%22Fire+lizard%22&lr=&ei=2YslSuiKNYncygT8qv2ABw here.  Thus, clearly there is something to be written on about "fire lizards" even if as a merge and redirect to the article on salamanders with a short section noting the word origins and meaning or to rework this article to be about how fire lizards have been addressed in multiple works of fiction.  Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: This does not meet the  as there does not appear to be significant coverage in independent sources.  I see trivial coverage in some works, but nothing significantly focused on this particular topic.  Also, there appears to be no real-world information available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)