Deletion of List of relationships with age disparity

Comment: or failing that, give it a severe pruning) Age disparities can be notable, for example with J. Howard Marshall and Anna Nicole Smith, or Muhammad and Aisha (the article on Aisha has a Aisha#Young_marriage_age_controversy section on her young marriage age. But most of the disparities are not noteable. Much of the article is |original research, which states that original research includes "new analysis or synthesis of published data". Also, I doubt whether this list can be complete. As far as having "documented almost every person in the world with a spouse 20 years younger than them" (to quote Kookykman), Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is one of the most frequently mentioned people in the past few weeks, yet this list doesn't note that he's reported to have had sex with a 14-year-old wife when he was 38. But thanks for your invitation for me to "please take a side
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: I have changed the excessively arbitrary criteria to a simpler and if anything overinclusive straight five-year cutoff.  I have also added {{tl|verify}}, since it doesn't cite sources.  Obviously it will be hard to complete, but not impossible, and in any case that's true of many lists.  But it's definitely verifiable; also neutral (it no more expresses the POV that age discrepancies are interesting than the existence Age disparity in sexual relationships does: both assume that the reader may be interested in their content, and it's certainly verifiable that ''some'' people are); and isn't inherently original research |as we define it.  It's a perfectly reasonable organization of preexisting information.I will note that I came here because Mr. Norton http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Simetrical&diff=58956238&oldid=58842162 contacted me on my talk page due to my self-categorization as a member of the m:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians|Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians.  I don't think that makes my opinion worthless, but it should be noted by the closing admin.  See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Richard+Arthur+Norton+%281958-+%29 his contribs: he contacted somewhere around forty inclusionists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per nom.  Yet another list with vague and arbitrary criteria governing what can/should be included in the list.  Who determined the cutoff of 10/5?  Strictly speaking... one spouse being 2 years older would be an age disparity.  Where was it decided that it suddenly becomes encyclopedic once the 10/5 diparity was reached?  Why different criteria for men and women?  The guidelines are simply too arbitrary and are inherently POV and possibly constitute |original reseach
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: as valid almanac content, just interesting and non-indiscriminate enough after cleanup. But note that the talkspamming violates the  guideline, which says "Don't attempt to sway consensus by encouraging participation in a discussion by people that you already know have a certain point of view". Accordingly, I submit that "Keep" votes by those so contacted should be discounted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)