Deletion of Alyssa Carson (4th nomination)

Comment: she may have an unusual claim to notability, but clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Seems like a case of , given there is . Also, , and nothing seems significantly different in terms of notability since the last AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:DINC)

Comment: The entire argument here seems to be . Per above, the subject passes GNG, and just because you don't like that the coverage exists doesn't change the fact that it does. Even your stated rationale for non-notability -- that the NASA stuff was "revealed and covered many times by the media" -- is itself a demonstration of GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: grudgingly''), whilst she is not notable in the sense of having done or experienced anything particularly exceptional, she has received a truly exceptional amount of coverage - which is the crux of the |general notability guidelines. COI issues can be addressed without deleting. --
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This user created the page from zero after the first deletion in June 2020 (why?), then added awards and filmography on July 2020 (very local awards and very specific tv appareances), then corrected her father's name on February 2021, and heavily fought trough all the deletion attempts. Like you said, since we're not speaking about Billie Eilish, it's a strange connection for a Canadian undegrad to have with a Louisiana astronaut wannabe. Hard to believe that some  is not happening here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: To clarify my position, I do most of my edits without logging in, since I'm not interested in having a career as a Wikipedia editor. And they're usually made to correct vandalized articles that I'm reading. I don't have anything personal against the subject of the article, since I'm not even from the same continent of her. I'm just an astronomy enthusiast who doesn't think that a wannabe astronaut should have a Wikipedia page until it actually became an astronaut, in accordance with the  policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: this was closed as Keep twice last year. What has changed since then? Per the sourcing in the article and the explanations in the other 2 AfDs,  is met. Concerns of PROMO and COI can be fixed through editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: IMHO, -REASON|Rule 4/ would only apply if the content of the article was not thoroughly backed up by sources. The subject meets GNG and has had coverage over an extended period (2014-2020). There are few things in this article that are not widely covered in a variety of sources. Does the page have issues? Yes. But should it be deleted? No
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:PROMO)