Deletion of Zappzter

Comment: seems like an obvious attempt to |use Wikipedia for promotion by two |single-purpose accounts, one of which would seem to have an obvious |conflict of interest while the other is an obvious username violation. Then there's the |meat-puppetry. Beyond all of that (in terms of the stuff that actually counts), there wouldn't seem to be anything available to substantiate |notability. Certainly no |significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources that I was able to find
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:SPA||WP:COI||WP:MEAT||WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: No |evidence found of attained notability, either in terms of the company or its software
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS)

Comment: WP:NN|Notability in Wikipedia has to be established by |reliable or |verifiable sources that are |independent of the subject.  The mere existence of the company is not sufficient.  Reliable sources are typically newspapers, books, journal articles, etc., that discuss the company in |depth and in multiple sources.  This article does not have those, nor could I find any in a Google search.  You can click on any of the blue links for a description of Wikipedia policy in that area.  Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:IS||WP:CORPDEPTH)