Deletion of Jack (cat)

Comment: Although reasonable coverage exists that indicate subject passes , the determining weight of this AfD would be more prudently judged by  as the cat's notability credentials (so far at least) strictly stem from its singular event. Under those criteria, the subject has not satisfied and in all likelihood will never satisfy  and , and enduring notability is a specific inclusion criteria of #NEWS. This article should be deleted because of the failure of those policies, but re-created in case of a future event that causes a lasting impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NNEWS||WP:EFFECT||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOT)

Comment: It's not clear whether this cat will be remembered but it doesn't matter because notability does not expire and the point of Wikipedia is to inform readers of things that they don't know, not things that they do.  There are lots of similar cats on the List of cats and the worst case seems to be that we would just merge this one onto that list per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: in the spirit of : he's not a person or alive, but this article needs to be deleted for the same WP:NOTNEWS reasons that we delete cases of BLP1E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The sources presented easily pass GNG. This is more than 1 Event. 1. Disappearance 2. Missing 3. Discovery 4. Passing. Jack doesn't need coverage in 2 weeks, Notability has been established and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: User:Yaksar, please discontinue removing the rescue tag from the article. Please read the information on the Article Rescue Squadron page regarding removal of rescue tags{{spaced ndash}}"It is unhelpful, and possibly disruptive, to remove the rescue tag before a deletion discussion is complete." Also please read the notability guideline section , Notability is not temporary, "Notability is not temporary: once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." As you're the one that nominated this article for deletion, it appears that you're trying to game the system to obtain the result for the article you desire, to have it deleted. Thank you for your consideration
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: Surpassing : http://www.qchron.com/news/south/jack-the-cat-dies-after-getting-lost-at-airport/article_f0fd6d6b-769b-5825-b44f-7097e479e872.html, http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/11/jack-the-cat-dies-from-wounds/, http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/new_york&id=8421105, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058528/Jack-cat-dies-going-missing-New-Yorks-JFK-airport.html, http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/jack-cat-disappeared-jfk-airport-miraculously-reappearing-dies-5-article-1.973107, http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/07/8679173-jack-the-cat-dies-after-getting-lost-at-jfk, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/07/jack-the-cat-dies-after-two-months_n_1079359.html. Significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)