Deletion of Incels

Comment: or '''Very selective merge''' to sexual frustration. If the ''concept'' was closed as delete just ''6 weeks ago'', there shouldn't be a question about an article for the abbreviated version/|neologism of/for that same concept. Seems like it could qualify for CSD in that regard. Based on the contexts in which this neologism is used, if merged, sexual frustration is the clear choice as being nearly synonymous (see previous AfD for more on the unsuitability of other targets). Quoting from my comment from August, that there are sources which combine the words "involuntary" and "celibacy" does not mean there is a distinct concept that merits a stand-alone article. In order to have a stand-alone article, it must be a concept we don't already cover elsewhere. The same goes for a neologism about the same concept. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per , also this article's previous incarnations have met with consensus that it should not exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per Aquillion, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: fails .  A neologism must have ''frequent use'', with multiple secondary sources describing that widespread use and meaning.  All the sources here are either tied to one event and mention it only in passing, or are primary sources showing usage.  Glancing over them, this almost feels more like a POV fork of Umpqua Community College shooting article.  Possibly a small amount of the content here could be merged into there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)