Deletion of Digital Blasphemy

Comment: I don't think the use by a software product meets notability criterion 3 of .  But on looking at Natural Desktop, that page looks to me to be part of a massive wikispam campaign around Stardock products.  The Stardock article is ridiculously long for a minor company, and there are separate articles for dozens of its products.  That by itself probably needs some attention and a big merge.    I'd also like to know more about the exact relationship between Digital Blasphemy and Stardock.  One should not be able to manufacture notability by linking to related products within Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)