Deletion of Brooklyn Artists

Comment: it's an  list of people mere connected by a common? geographical workplace?/residence?/birthplace? Also "Brooklyn Artists" (with capital A) suggests a particular group or organization. But the list is an array of "Brooklyn artists" (with lower case a
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: per  relative to :Category:Artists from Brooklyn. "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative. Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided." I recommend renaming the article to List of artists based in Brooklyn
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: per . Honestly below the state (if not national) level, we should ''only'' be maintaining Fooers from Footown in list form. It's kind of ridiculous for a category to intersect a career with ''part'' of a city, given that these "from" categories don't even link the location to where they actually practiced their career. But lists can be maintained at a much more detailed level without interfering with anything else
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists says, "Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables." {{user|Northamerica1000}} https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FBrooklyn_Artists&type=revision&diff=669703132&oldid=669702205 has shown with several sources that "List of artists from Brooklyn" is a notable topic.I also agree with {{user|postdlf}} that several of the "delete" votes advance arguments that conflict with the guideline Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Overlapping categories, lists and navigation templates are not considered duplicative, which says: It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic.  These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative.  Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and |should be avoided. Another argument for deletion is , which has four bullet points: (1) Summary-only descriptions of works, (2) Lyrics databases, (3) Excessive listings of statistics, and (4) Exhaustive logs of software updates. None of these bullet points can be applied to "List of artists from Brooklyn
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)