Deletion of Criticism of the scientific status of neuroscience

Comment: Although I don't fully understand all of it, this essay looks to argue the position that because one could take a dualist position that the mind and brain are different, many experiments in neuroscience are fundamentally flawed science. The relation of philosophical dualism to neuroscience is an important topic in neurophilosophy. But most neuroscientists are not dualists and I suspect most dualists would agree that science is being done, it is just the interpretation of results that is flawed. So I think this qualifies as  in the sense of few adherents and I doubt if it is notable fringe. The article itself is an opinion piece, not an encyclopedic description of the sources of this philosophical position; it would require a full rewrite with good RS. A non-notable fringe topic and a seriously flawed article suggest deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: I ''do'' feel that I can understand the material pretty well, and there are pretty solid reasons to delete the page. Most of the page summarizes work by neuroscientists who ''do'' consider it to be a science, and that is followed by a lengthy essay that is 100% uncited and . Thus, there is hardly any sourcing for what ought to be the main topic of the page, with most cited sources contradicting what the pages says, except in the opinion of the editor who wrote it. Now, that said, as much as I like neuroscience, I like  too, and I'm quite receptive to having some coverage of "criticism of neuroscience", subject to . As Mark viking correctly says, the available source material indicates that the premise that "neuroscience is not really science" is a  premise, mostly promulgated by critics of psychiatry (claims that psychiatric diseases are not really diseases, and that psychiatrists are corrupt, or whatever). However, on the more precise question of Mind–body problem|mind-body Dualism (philosophy of mind)|dualism, there is plenty of source material, already covered on those existing pages. It does occur to me, however, that Human brain#Cognition, the place in our neuroscience-related pages that is most directly related to the issues in the page nominated here, could be expanded (again, subject to due weight) to include some mention of the arguments against materialism and physicalism, so that might be worth about a sentence or two. That does not really add up to a merge, however
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:DUE||WP:FRINGE)