Deletion of Logan Williams (2nd nomination)

Comment: per {{user|InedibleHulk}}, after a through search and assistance from {{user|Cunard}}, there appears to be a lack of source covering him prior to death. He does not appear to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per nom. A case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: the concentration of the article and the sources used all apply to one event so it is a case of . Take away the coverage about his death and there is not enough left to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria|BASIC/Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline|GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The Joey Awards are not a notability-clinching award per : that status does not just automatically attach to every award that ''exists'', but applies ''only'' to awards that are notable enough to generate media coverage ''about the award presentation''. In Canada, that's the Canadian Screen Awards and its predecessors, the Prix Iris, a small selection of top-tier film festivals (TIFF, VIFF, RVCQ) and the Toronto, Vancouver and Quebec film critics association awards — and kindly note that I'm saying this ''as a Canadian'', so spare me the "you're just biased against Canadian topics" crap: I literally work on almost nothing ''but'' Canadian film and television, and basically ''am'' Wikipedia's ''entire'' Canadian film project task force. It works the same for ''every'' award ''everywhere'': if the award can be referenced ''only'' to its own self-published website about itself, because ''media'' coverage ''about'' the award presentation is nonexistent, then it is ''not'' an award that makes its winners notable for winning it, ''regardless'' of whether it's a Canadian, American, British, Australian, German, Italian, Spanish, Indian or Nigerian award. The notability test for awards is not "it's Country X's version of this other thing from Country Y", it's "the award gets coverage about it in real media".But there's no stronger notability claim being made here, and there's very little in the way of quality |reliable source coverage: except for the blip of death-announcement coverage itself, literally everything else here is referenced to |blogs and |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all. This is not how you demonstrate that an actor is notable enough for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:RS||WP:BLOGS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: per nom - and also move the content of Logan Williams (entrepreneur) back to Logan Williams (which is now a disambig page) and delete Logan Williams (entrepreneur). A tragically young death, but I agree that this is a BLP1E and falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)