Deletion of Descendants of Charles II of England

Comment: per Agricolae. The list falls under  and the intro is . If a RS did happen to discuss this subject it might be better suited as a subsection of Charles II of England
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: There's |nothing irredeemably bad about this article. It has some synthesis, but soucres from other articles can be added. It would be a great pity to lose all of this information and formatting. Can it be userfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Firstly, this is a horrifically confusing mess of an article which doesn't even follow it's own scope. The article is defined as descendants of Charles II, but it could more accurately be described as "some male line descendants who held peerages (kind of)". It's not clear what the purpose of the article actually is, and it's likely because it's not following a well structured reliable source. Secondly, although a certain amount of genealogy is to be expected (encouraged even), when dealing with monarchs this article strays too far into the  category. Acceptable examples of genealogy could include Grandchildren of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, which has a very clear defined scope with purpose. While I definitely think this article meets the criteria for deletion, I would be interested to see a similar article with a much narrower and purposeful scope, such as Illegitimate children of Charles II be created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGENEALOGY)