Deletion of Frances Street Squats (2nd nomination)

Comment: I found a public-interest journalism https://ricochet.media/en/1178/short-lived-housing-squat-in-vancouver-a-sign-of-more-to-come source from 2016 that reports on the Frances Street Squats in the context of other squats, and mentions the documentary about the Frances Street Squats, which is linked in the External Links section of the article. This commentary, along with the documentary, appear to support  (the guideline specifically identifies a documentary film as an example of substantial coverage, and also states {{tq|at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary}}, which the source linked above and the documentary appear to satisfy), and there is another https://www.pacificrimcollege.com/2018/06/permaculture-and-the-anthropocene/ source, albeit from a student writing on a Pacific Rim College website in 2018, that describes the Frances Street Squats as "one of the largest and most notable public squats in Canadian history," which suggests that additional sources may . The article also is already more than a stub, which is part of what the  guideline seems concerned with avoiding
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NEXIST||WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: which The Province coverage? I didn't see it cited. Care to explain which source you mean? Local Vancouver matters (local affairs) covered in  Vancouver press is hardly a surprise. The Ubyssey is exceedingly local. The Ubyssey would be reliable coverage for that those things happened near the UBC campus, but meaningless for notability. Have you looked at AUD in ? Also articles that extensively quote long quotes of "the subject organization said..." for the lack of intellectual |independence should be properly discounted. That book you talk about is very much locally focused. A chapter in a locally focused isn't much in terms of audience.  It's also over reaching to speculate on the coverage significance based on a chapter in a book you don't have access to
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)