Deletion of American-Born Confused Desi

Comment: Wikipedia allows social/scientific/cultural/academic concepts to have their own articles as long as there is enough notability for inclusion. Take a look at Salaryman or Baby boomer. As such this concept seems to be mighty notable. Take a look at a http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?tab=pn&q=american+born+confused+desi&ie=UTF-8 Google nes search, a http://books.google.co.uk/books?q=american+born+confused+desi&btnG=Search+Books Google book search and a http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=american+born+confused+desi&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search Google scholar search. The article needs serious expansion and improvement, but that's a separate issue altogether.  For a concept as notable as this and as supported by reliable sources, even scholarly sources,  hardly applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The article is well sourced (American-Born Confused Desi#References). However, It does not meet  criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)