Deletion of Yugo Deb Net

Comment: Perhaps the information presented in the article could be moved to another article. I see no evidence of notability in the article and a Google search turns up less than 20 results (I put the name in quotes) and none of them with any substantial information on the organization, so not only does the article not meet otability but there is no evidence that it ever can meet it. If anyone can add sources meeting otability standards before this deletion discussion is over, please contact me and I'll change my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: The issue is that the sources provided - though sound, if we |AGF - are not enough to establish Notability of the subject. My Serbian is spotty at best, but I can find no non-english sources that even appear to reference this organization or acknowledge its existance. I stress that I am not an authority on the subject - but the lack of additional sources, even non-english ones, is telling. I'll note further that the article itself does not assert the notability of its topic. With all respect, the consensus is clearly that the article must improve or be deleted. If, in 10 days and counting of this AFD, it has not been improved at all, and no additional verifiable sources added despite repeated requests for same, then there's no recourse - consensus must be served. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: fails . That said, it's daft for the nominator to say that improving articles is "against the spirit of Wikipedia". Any good topic can have a bad article. The goal is improving the encyclopedia, not putting articles (or editors) on trial. A nominator should be happy to see an article worked on, instead of |seeing their moment of glory slip away
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:OWN)