Deletion of Kippax Centre

Comment: The article is about a shopping center.  The hurdle is  I do not see anything in the article, nor does a search find anything that meets that.  Arguments about "''populated places''" must pass  and I don't see anything that passes that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILD||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: reply|Jeepday}}, none of your arguments show that merging or redirection is not an inappropriate alternative. There are Google hits that at least mean it is worth a mention in the suburb article (given that Kippax Centre, like Manuka and Dickson Centre, are localities in their own right within Canberra) - and that's without searching for offline sources, of which there must be at least some that cover this particular area's history as part of the history of suburban Canberra, and |alternatives MUST be considered before deletion. A merge or redirect is entirely appropriate here, and will avoid the work done on the article just being wasted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: per Pontificalibus (or if not, '''Merge''') - given that |alternatives to deletion must be considered first, an obvious outcome if there is no consensus to keep is a merge to Holt, Australian Capital Territory. There seem to be quite a few media articles on the shopping centre just from doing a simple Google search (let alone any book or other media which almost certainly exists on local ACT history that would presumably cover it) this probably does meet GNG, but even if it doesn't in its own right there is clearly no valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Passes  with https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=a6wWEAAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PA308, https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/5992273/turf-war-brewing-as-plan-paves-way-for-major-kippax-expansion/, https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6024541/more-shops-flagged-for-kippax-under-revised-draft-master-plan/, https://the-riotact.com/bigger-better-kippax-fair-step-closer-but-loss-of-open-space-will-rankle/376329, https://www.ausleisure.com.au/news/act-government-to-sacrifice-1.6-hectare-holt-sporting-fields-for-shopping-centre-expansion/, https://the-riotact.com/shock-shift-in-kippax-plan-replaces-ovals-with-development/187677. etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)