Deletion of Kweku Adoboli

Comment: to 2011 UBS rogue trader scandal. What's with all the keep votes? Clearly untenable under . Seriously, why do people bother commenting in AfD debates if they have no idea of how our inclusion criteria? The article can be salvaged by making it about the event, not the individual. All that is needed is a move. What is crystal clear is that the article as it stands does not meed 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:BIO)

Comment: It's not as though there was a whole gallery of rogue traders, just this one guy.  He is the event.  Would you argue then that Nick Leeson should be moved to 1995 Barings Bank rogue trader scandal?  I'll concede that  does suggest that in general, when there is a single article it should reflect the event.  However I think  supports the current title, as I feel users are more likely to be looking for this with Kweku Adoboli than "UBS rogue trader scandal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:CRITERIA)

Comment: Agree with Dbachmann.  Merge or move  to 2011 UBS rogue trader scandal.   definitely applies here.  Also agree with nominator that this can be broken out into a separate article later
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: and besides, Colonel Warden's interpretation of the  policy appears to be the correct one.  Seriously, people, if you are going to cite Wikipedia policy, at least have the decency to read it first
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per .  The question is not whether the incident is notable (it is), nor whether he will be notable in the future (he might be) nor even how many newspaper articles talk about this incident today (zillions).  The question is whether we have enough information for a '''biography''' of the man.  Just now I removed such scintillating trivia as the claim that he has 11 friends on facebook who are current or former employees of UBS.  Gee, he has friends on facebook... from work.  This is not a biography, this is just collecting scraps of information that don't add up to a biography
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as per  and  and NickCT above
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: WP:BLP1E tells us that a biography is fine in such a case: "''If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented—as in the case of John Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981—a separate biography may be appropriate. ''".   tells us that we shouldn't even be thinking about deleting when we have numerous good sources like the BBC and FT
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)