Deletion of Natalia Toreeva

Comment: I think she actually satisfy rtist - #3 ("The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work"). Was her role in these books and films "major"? Yes, because her contribution was necessary. No secondary sources about the person are required in such cases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29#Academics per guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: When Ymblanter has read the sources in the original language, I hesitate to disagree with his assessment that the subject qualifies for WP:BIO.  However, everyone's in agreement that the entire history of this article is junk.  Let's just |get rid of the current mess but allow someone else to create an article on this notable person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: and (re)salt. Not sure why {{U|RHaworth}} restored this after it had been deleted and |salted. |Promotional |autobiography of a |non-notable person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:PROMO||WP:AUTO||WP:GNG)