Deletion of Sabine Hossenfelder

Comment: Aside from potential notability as a physics popularizer, Google scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NaQZcyYAAAAJ shows 6-8 publications with over 100 citations each (count a little fuzzy because it crosses one out for reasons I don't understand and another is just short). That's enough for #C1 for me, even in a high-citation field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Citation record https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NaQZcyYAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=aohttps://inspirehep.net/author/profile/S.Hossenfelder.1 is enough for #C1; she is quoted as an expert often enough (e.g., https://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21734379-no-guts-no-glory-fundamental-physics-frustrating-physicistshttps://gizmodo.com/dark-matter-is-not-dead-1820809277https://gizmodo.com/could-higgs-bosons-and-primordial-black-holes-explain-d-1824091299https://arstechnica.com/features/2017/05/emergent-gravity-and-dark-matter-explained-by-excited-universe/https://www.quantamagazine.org/researchers-check-space-time-to-see-if-its-made-of-quantum-bits-20170621/, in addition to refs already in article) to satisfy #C7
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes  easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)