Deletion of Édmée Schneerson (2nd nomination)

Comment: as per  and . There is no indication of any notability at all, nor any proof of significant influence(s) or achievements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per my first !vote, fails  and . I'm all for countering ystemic bias, but until those sources actually appear, en.wp cannot have an article on her. Perhaps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:S)

Comment: Using Google as the sole (or even primary) standard is explicitly against |notability, and should be discounted. In the Lubavitch community she is very notable, and it is also obvious that in that community females are not splashed in the public's eye (e.g., traditional secondary/tertiary sources) due to their cultural sensitivity as publicity relates to women (i.e., there would be a cultural bias on the part of Wikipedia without adjusting the standards for that community, just as there would be for Native Americans, etc.). More prudent, IMHO, is to take seriously DGG's concern of the limited source, and because Wikipedia http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_is_not_paper is not paper, retain with the tag asking for additional documentation, with the understanding that additional documentation may be from atypical sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: No mention outside of Wikipedia or its mirrors; no Google news, no Google books, no Google scholar.  The article also makes no claim to notability. Being related to someone notable does not make you notable.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This woman does not satisfy , her lineage is insufficient to warrant a stand-alone article as per , and the only remotely notable information on her is insignificant as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:INHERITED||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Not to re-hash all the previous points made, but prior to her mention in the sole source cited which fails , this article also fails  and cannot begin to claim any significant notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)