Deletion of Mike Beedle

Comment: or merge) to Scrum (software development) - This is a sightly difficult case.  doesn't apply here as the person wasn't an academic. The argument that "Beedle's books have received in excess of seven thousand citations. That is a clear pass of " is not exactly correct. If you look at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Mike+Beedle%22 Google Scholar, the first book "Agile software development with Scrum" is notable (coincidentally I am reading it right now). However, the figure of "Cited by 3615"seems to be inflated. A look at https://dl.acm.org/author_page.cfm?id=81100437642&coll=DL&dl=ACM&trk=0 citation count on ACM digital library gives 364 citations. The second and third items on google scholar are actually the same document: "Agile Manifesto" which was signed by 17 people including Beedle. I wouldn't count this as an academic publication and the citation count is inflated as Google takes into account various unpublished technical reports. Overall, the subject's claim to notability is for being one of people involved in describing "Scrum" along with Ken Schwaber in the book "Agile software development with Scrum" (mentioned above). The subject is notable for one contribution  and it seems fitting to redirect  this to Scrum (software development
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Comment''' Abstract for ''Teams That Finish Early Accelerate Faster: A Pattern Language for High Performing Scrum Teams''  (System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on Conference Date(s): 6-9 Jan. 2014 Waikoloa, pp 4722 - 4728 ( https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=6759182 ) seems to have a useful reference to acclaiming ''Scrum: A Pattern Language for Hyperproductive Software Development'' as a groundbreaking work ... while he was co-author the abstract notes Mike Beedle's contribution specifically.  Any significant merge into ''Scrum (Software Development)'' would would be  and disrupt it so opposed to that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)