Deletion of Coinfloor

Comment: The Wired article is entirely based on information provided by the company with zero "Independent Content" (as per ). Similar articles (using the same quotes) can be found at https://www.verdict.co.uk/electronic-payments-international/news/new-uk-bitcoin-exchange-opens/ this Verdict reference and https://www.theglobaltreasurer.com/2013/10/30/bitcoin-exchange-coinfloor-opens-in-london/ this The Global Treasurer reference, fails . The ST article is similarly based on information provided by the company with zero "Independent Content". Also fails . Finally, the TechCrunch article is comments on content provided by the company at an invite-only Bitcoin conference, again with zero Independent Content. All three references fail 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, references to date including the churnalism ones mentioned above fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: I agree with the nominator that articles about it opening are not enough to pass . Companies open. That's what they do and it's an extremely trivial topic. Whomever is covering it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)