Deletion of Prometheus Society

Comment: StevanMD, first off, obviously has a biased view, as his userpage states that he is a member of this society. Second of all, I would like to remind said user, in addition to the many pages Angus listed, of . Me voting delete on a page in which you have a vested interest is not a personal attack against you, nor should you take it as such. You telling me that I voted in bad will and that my opinions do not matter ''is'' a personal attack against me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: WP:NN is worth reading, as is .  is good as well.  is fun.  I like. SCA trips off the tongue. Wikipedia:Walled garden|Walled garden is informative. There's so much to read on deletion policy and how it works in practice. I know what deletion polocy says, but have you read  (A7 in particular) or had a look at  ? Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia, it's not a reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:ADS||WP:VSCA||WP:CSD||WP:PROD)

Comment: no gnews hits, at most one plausible scholar hits (''Journal of Irreproducible Results'') and no gbooks hits dealing with the society (well, not unless Ken Hudnall's ''Manhattan Conspiracy III: Angel of Death'' is factual, and I'm pretty sure that's not the case). The raw ghits include a fair number (20% or so) for the "Prometheus Society of Slovakia" which is something different. Doesn't come close to meeting  that I can see and verifiability again limited to being a paraphrase of (actually a quote from) the group's website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: without commenting on this article and its status here--at least not at this time, as I haven't looked into it enough yet--I would like to comment that many Wikipedia editors, including myself, see |notability standards as an extension of #Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I think notability issues have a valid place in AfD discussions, and though there are plenty of editors who disagree with this, it's not an uncommon guideline. Please refrain from alleging all such references to notability as "bad will"; |assume our good faith and we'll try to do the same for you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:NOT||WP:AGF)