Deletion of Vijoo Krishnan (2nd nomination)

Comment: the subject seems to be pass  comfortably, well above the threshold for . For instances there are articles covered in mainstream media with the subject in the article as the primary subject.{{cite news |last=Viswanath |first=Chandrakanth |date=13 March 2018 |title=Meet JNU Alumnus Vijoo Krishnan, Man who inspired 500 Farmers to March 180-km |url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/meet-jnu-alumnus-vijoo-krishnan-man-who-inspired-50000-farmers-to-march-180-km-1687019.html |publisher=News 18}}{{cite news |last=Jayan |first=T. V. |date=24 January 2020 |title=Extend PM-Kisan, pension scheme to tenant and old farmers: Vijoo Krishnan |url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/budget/extend-pm-kisan-pension-scheme-to-tenant-and-old-farmers-vijoo-krishnan/article30636448.ece |publisher= Business Line}}{{cite news |last=P. T |first=Thufail |date=26 March 2018 |title=Red Ants In A Line |url=https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/red-ants-in-a-line/299938 |publisher=Outlook India }} These are hardly trivial, he also seems to be quoted quite frequently in news articles from what I can see.  is a secondary category for determining notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Nothing here passes , and the footnotes are virtually all a |reference bombed mix of |primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in news articles that are not ''about'' him. All of those references count for nothing, and the few sources that ''are'' actually about Vijoo Krishnan in any trivial way are not ''enough'' to get him over  all by themselves if all the rest of the sourcing is junk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG)

Comment: How does this article fail ? There is significant press coverage about him in different Indian languages including English (Which is very evident from the long list of references provided in the article itself). Also refer Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Politicians, Leaders of registered political parties at the national level are sometimes considered notable despite their party's lack of electoral success. This guy is a central committee member of Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Kisan_Long_March,_Maharashtra|the protest he orchestrated was a national phenomenon.  It is also not clear how this article violates . There is significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Agree that there are a lot of primary sources given in the citation list, but there are reliable secondary sources as well. I support questioning/removing the content with primary source citations; nevertheless, the article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)