Deletion of Xerus (spacecraft)

Comment: to Lynx (spacecraft). The nominator's rationaile is wholly flawed and not based on policy;  is ''not'' grounds to not have an article, as Bigfoot, Ogopogo and Aurora (aircraft) will attest. This would ordinarily lead me to call for a speedy closure; however, since we're here and |Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, the fact is that this is a case where there is a clear merge target for what would otherwise be a permastub: Lynx (spacecraft), the sucessor that developed from the Xerus project and leverages heavily off its technology
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITDOESNTEXIST||WP:NOTBURO)