Deletion of Lauren Conrad (3rd nomination)

Comment: The reason stated here is the same as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Conrad|the last one, in saying the nominator works for MTV, speaks for Ms. Conrad, and wishes the article deleted due to Conrad's wishes. The subject is notable, but that is not what the nomination is about. As before, the nominator has no proof that they actually speak on behalf of Ms. Conrad, and even if they did, there is no grounds for deletion. Also as before, this deletion makes for the nominator's first and only edits to WP and seems to be a clear violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: With respect to Conrad (and we only have the nominator's word that these are in fact her wishes), she is a public figure who has appeared in two major television programs and has also won a notable award. Such notability disqualifies one from requesting that media coverage be removed. This does not, of course, apply to incorrect or libellous information that may be in the article and which fall under  policies. But that's a content issue, not a "should this article exist?" issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)