Deletion of London Buses route 394 (2nd nomination)

Comment: the coverage in Time Out and Buses magazine are sufficient to meet |GNG. I agree that the Daily Telegraph mention on its own would be nowhere near enough, as the route ''is'' inconsequential to the story
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'm inclined to agree with the nominator. There's nothing specific to this article to establish notability for this route. The list  of bus routes in London covers the pertinent information from this article already. If a notes column were added to the table on that list, the few historical facts could be added to that page as well. In the meantime, a footnote for that information could be appended to the service provider name in the table. On the whole, this article though does not satisfy , so delete, or redirect it back to the list. Even the one article (the birth on the bus) doesn't establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)