Deletion of Bicycle magazine

Comment: but move to List of cycling magazines, with the original name as a redirect. I could also live with the redirect to a category, but it's not my preferred approach. I don't buy the nominators argument of 'we don't have other similar pages so we shouldn't have this', but I'm also not convinced that there is enough coverage of cycling magazines as an independently notable concept to justify an article rather than a list. We should, however, have no difficulty finding sources that list cycling magazines in order to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: reasonable listing of noteworthy bicycle magazines with a prose introduction. It's how |lists are supposed to look. Neutral on moving to the "list of" title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL)