Deletion of Pope John Paul II: The Movie

Comment: spaced ndash}} The topic obviously passes . See the !votes above for some the sources that proves this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per manifest lack of . See ''http://www.nytimes.com/1983/12/04/movies/for-albert-finney-risk-is-everything.html New York Times'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Bq8yAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Ne8FAAAAIBAJ&pg=2982,1721583&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en Ottawa Citizen'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=aHpQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=KRIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5796,3415409&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en The Milwakee Sentinel'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PohQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=PhIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5653,4245243&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en  The Milwakee Sentinel-bis'', ''http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/662818721.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Apr+21%2C+1984&author=JACK+THOMAS&pub=Boston+Globe+%28pre-1997+Fulltext%29&desc=TELEVISION+JACK+THOMAS%3B+FAIR+STORY+ABOUT+A+GOOD+MAN&pqatl=google Boston Globe'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HQIMAAAAIBAJ&sjid=aVkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5912,1847388&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en The Evening Independent'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rUVgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=-3ANAAAAIBAJ&pg=1081,899815&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en The Phoenix'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FUVQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6FcDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5775,4413649&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en The Courier'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=RDpSAAAAIBAJ&sjid=UDYNAAAAIBAJ&pg=1881,4094946&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en The Day'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=3w8iAAAAIBAJ&sjid=DMgEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3154,5304081&dq=pope-john-paul+albert-finney&hl=en Times Daily'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=h7YfAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ktcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4316,4061763&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en The Southeast Missourian'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=0hZFAAAAIBAJ&sjid=VLsMAAAAIBAJ&pg=5651,2590557&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en The Telegraph-Herald'', ''http://www.nytimes.com/1984/04/22/arts/tv-view-this-portrait-of-the-pope-takes-few-risks.html New York Times-bis'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=JcZEAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hLYMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1650,1861113&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en Sunday Union'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=X60_AAAAIBAJ&sjid=g1YMAAAAIBAJ&pg=1309,1805662&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en Youngstown Vindicator'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=EJBOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ffsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2545,2146277&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en Lakeland Ledger'', ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4IJGAAAAIBAJ&sjid=LTANAAAAIBAJ&pg=2563,2343518&dq=pope+john+paul+albert+finney&hl=en The Evening News'' and a lot more (no mention about the books!). The nominator is invited to change his search method, as it is not the first time that he nominates/proposes for deletion with this same rationale subjects that have literally tons of reliable coverage in support of their notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)