Deletion of @evleaks

Comment: Source coverage is borderline for establishing notability. Like the nom, if that were the only issue I'd be inclined to give it a pass. Unfortunately the article is also an unambiguous  - . That plus the iffy sourcing tips the argument in favor of deletion. I did not take into consideration the menacing comment, allegedly from the subject of the article, preferring to judge the article on its own merits. But I will note that it was not very classy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:PROMO)