Deletion of Morris Waxler (2nd nomination)

Comment: per DGG and  - while he may be notable, this isn't an article, it's a LinkedIn page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: I agree with Lesion and Bobrayner.  I had originally AFD'ed the Waxler article when it first arrived based on the fact that he is not independently notable apart from the somewhat newsworthy LASIK controversy.  There is already a section in the LASIK article about the surrounding controversy; publishing articles on each opponent of LASIK gives that controversy |undue weight
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: As per Lesion and WikiDan61.The Subject fails  and another  and was in the news solely for his views on Lasik surgery it did generate hits for it but that does not make him notable.This article is part of Paid POV pushing https://www.elance.com/j/master-wikipedia-publisher-put-up-content-that-wont-get-deleted/46368669
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COATRACK||WP:G)

Comment: promotional 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)