Deletion of Mark A. O'Neill

Comment: as too early. GS cites are 122, 114, 29, 17, 11, 8, 8...with an h-index of 7 in a high cited field. This is not enough to satisfy rof#C1. Fellowships are not sufficient. The article RanaVision, which looks promotional, needs to be looked at too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Per Xxanthippe's analysis. The memberships mentioned by Ubelowme do not contribute anything to notability: it's sufficient to work in an appropriate field and pay the membership fees. This fails , but the sources provided (''Science'' and BBC) go some way to satisfying . Something more substantial would clinch it. The article needs a serious overhaul (weird bolding, inappropriate in-text external links, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)