Deletion of Theo Obrastoff

Comment: a simple Google search turned up 194 hits on his name, and none in what I'd refer to as |notable, non-trivial reliable sources; two hits in Google News Archive were passing mentions, as were many of the regular hits. He runs the record label, apparently, so any records are self-published. Without coverage in reliable sources, verifiable proof that he's toured extensively, etc., he doesn't appear to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: as original nominator. These days anyone with a computer can release a CD and sell it worldwide, therefore it's not an automatic decree of notability. As for "|other stuff exists" well yes it does and it is totally immaterial to this discussion. You have had ages to produce sources that meet  yet you still haven't done so. Do they exist? As for the diskspace argument, how about a response of "precedence"? If we don't stick to the rules any teenager with a guitar and a copy of iGarage will be wanting an article too. This is an encyclopaedia, it's not a musician's promotion agency, therefore some semblance of notability should be established hence  and . As I noted in my original nomination this guy has minimal net presence, and what there is isn't independent, non-trivial or substantial. All of which are required regardless of how much free space is available on the server's drives
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:RS||WP:MUSIC||WP:RS)