Deletion of List of marijuana slang terms 2

Comment: I've removed all the unsourced content... which is to say all of it... and placed it on the talk page. I personally have no objection to this topic whatsoever, believe most of the content is probably valid, but all of it, like all of WIkipedia, is subject to the |verifiability policy. If people wish to find sources for the items and move them back into the article as sources are found, I think it would be a perfectly acceptable article. I'm not going to vote yet; I want to see whether there's any evidence that the editors of the page are willing to do the minimal research work needed to make this a legitimate article. When there are at least a dozen sourced entries in the article, and no unsourced entries, I'll suggest "strong keep" and lobby everyone who's suggestion deletion to change their suggestion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: with bafflement as to how the previous AfD didn't stick. Rampantly unverifiable, some of these seem totally implausible and sound like |things made up in school one day, and keeping it is like putting up a neon sign that says "bored stoners, please screw around with this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: per nomination in accordance with several parts of ; add "Wikipedia is not a jargon or usage guide."  Also lamely fails to include ''dope'' or ''stoned'' (not to mention less ubiquitous terms such as ''4:20'', ''dugout'', ''lid'', ''muggles'' (jazz/blues jargon), ''number'', et cetera).  In support of Dpbsmith's effort, I'll go do some research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, |Wikipedia is not a dictionary, |Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary, fails  and . Big time vandal magnet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NFT||WP:V)