Deletion of Michael Labno

Comment: It could be argued that any ballot-listed candidate for the U.S. Senate is notable, but I don't agree - and that's the only basis on which Labno qualifies. The sources provided in the article are not very significant. The two  Sun-Times articles are about other people, with passing references to Lagno. The story from the Independent Political Report is mostly about Labno, but I don't know if it is a Reliable Source. Project Vote Smart lists info about everyone on every ballot right down to dogcatcher; being listed there does not imply notability, and the information they publish is mostly self-supplied and thus not independent. The Daily Herald piece is about Labno's candidacy and the ABC item is about him getting put on the ballot; in my mind those stories are about the election, not about him, and do not make him notable per , but others may disagree
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Labno seems to have been the subject of multiple independent news articles regarding his candidacy for Senate and thus meets the basic criteria set out by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per ikipedia is not a source for election candidate biographies. I interpret routine election coverage to fall under . Also, the coverage about the candidate is in the context of the election, so (per ) redirect to the election article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)