Deletion of Lombardi gras

Comment: in fact '''Speedy delete''' if possible. This is borderline for a speedy delete as promotional: it certaionly serves no other purpose that I can see. Certainly no evidence of notability. (The Facebook page referred to above was given not as a source but as a promotional link. It was unacceptable under at least 3 of the provisions of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:ELNO)

Comment: There's definitely no |speedy criterion that would apply, and it may astonish you to learn that this term appears in, among other places, the http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-saints-celebrate9-2010feb09,0,6933187.story Los Angeles Times, although in a different sense than is meant here.  Still, the content of ''this'' article is , and the whole thing is a  concerning something that is merely 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:MADEUP||WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:INTHENEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)