Deletion of Mohamed Osman Mohamud

Comment: Agree with nominator per  & , this person is only known for one recent news event and is otherwise not at all notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: article should be kept as it is a high profile criminal plot with loads of coverage in RS as per /CA.  whether it should be renamed can be discussed on the article talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Renaming would only resolve . It would not address the fact that the incident itself fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I would say delete, obviously I would be a minority here, but hear me out. This case is one of hundreds in the FBIs files where information was traced to a person and acted on. This person is a 19 year old moron who thought it was cool to kill a bunch of people. He makes plans to connect himself with a terrorist cell, instead ties himself to an FBI agent. They toy with him a little, try to judge what he wants to do, they figure out said moron wants to blow things up, and they let him run himself right into a good old fashioned trap. The only reason this person is notable is that he is a moron, an apparently religious moron judging by the "God is great" shouting incident, and that all he actually ended up doing? NOT DOING A DAMN THING BUT MAKING HIMSELF LOOK LIKE A MORON TO THE WORLD. Intent does not make a person notable, otherwise every person who in the world who wanted to do something would be notable. If anything at all is shown by this case, is that the FBI is making inroads into POTENTIAL terrorists and that real ones still exist somewhere else, but not in this case. He wasnt anything, didnt actually do anything therefore no  unless you want to add it to the FBIs page as a job well done. In the end he couldnt even screw up something well, since he actually believed the agent when they told him that the cars windows were blocking the cell phone signal. For whats its worth, that is my opinion. I believe we as a community need to sit down and figure out the standards for cases like this because we seriously need a way to guard against sensationalism in the WIki and IMO this article is sensationalism. We will probably see more and more incidents for things like this and we need a standard to go by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)