Deletion of Ultimate Glory 11: A Decade of Fights

Comment: as WP:RECENTISM. Once again, a fighting event with no sources. Same page defenders, same poor arguments. The only independent source, Sherdog, merely reports routine results. No section of  has been met, all independent coverage is . If page defenders spent as much time digging up sources as they did asserting notability in AfD and complaining about these processes, we could likely keep a few more. If King Kong were fighting Godzilla, we'd still need sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: If sources could be added surely almost 20 days would have been enough time to add them in? Ultimate Glory 11: A Decade of Fights has only 1 independent reference (I'm not counting the one that appears to be the event site!) The Sherdog site is an independent reference and is probably an ok reference since it has editors and therefore has fact checking. #12 has a blog (bshowassault.blogspot.com) as one of the two references.  applies here. Though there might be a case to make for this blog - I don't know. The other one is sherdog again so that's probably ok. So again one reliable source. #13 has adcombat.com which I can't judge as a reference and mmamadman.com which I also couldn't judge. Both seem independent. I'd have been happier if either listed editors but they might be just fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS)

Comment: quite simply they lack the sources to meet  - if after all this time no sources have been found then we can assume there are none out there. Even the single Sherdog reference simply reports the results without editorial comment. One of the keepers, above, says "I'm finding coverage in a variety of areas including affiliates of USA Today." but none have been produced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)