Deletion of Be'er Sheva North Railway Station

Comment: per lack of |significant coverage from |independent sources.  No, railway stations are not inherently notable - that would be in violation of WP:NOT#DIRECTORY
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS)

Comment: A little advice for the nominator: Giving uninterestingness as a reason for deletion, even as a corollary to something that could be reasonably backed up, is probably one of the top ways to get your deletion attempt nerfed in the quickest possible fashion. See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The only violation of  was made by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Railway stations are major nodes of an area's transportation network, and some stations smaller than this make their way into ''printed paper encyclopedias'' (Hallingskeid has an entry in ''Aschehoug'' for instance). Some further points:  points to "reliable" sources which is NOT the same as "independent" sources.  is being quoted in an utterly silly fashion in the nomination (who is trying to disrupt Wikipedia here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:POINT)