Deletion of Brighton Tower

Comment: per |crystal ball rule. This seems like a big deal for Brighton but it doesn't seem that notable otherwise. Most large developments have some level of political back-and-forth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Does not yet meet the requirements of , but of course welcome back when it does. --&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: That certainly does sound genuinely notable and interesting, and (as the proposer of the deletion) I'd say that I for one will be all in favour of an article on it, when it happens, or when documentation about the project is available. But without concrete (unambiguous) evidence, it's |original research and unsuitable for Wikipedia. &ndash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)