Deletion of Brittany Pettibone

Comment: Doesn't look to be quite enough to pass /. That said, I don't buy the / rationales for deletion. There's a similar justification associated with another recent AfD for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Barnett (4th nomination)|Jacob Barnett. Whereas he was a child, making claims inappropriately reported upon by the media, with exposure in large part through his parents, she is an adult with coverage about her words and activities made in public, as a public person. If there's significant coverage of her in reliable sources, then as long as we present it neutrally, without disproportionately emphasizing the negative, it's not a problem for BLP. But, again, I don't see quite enough that GNG is satisfied here. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:ATTACK||WP:BLP)

Comment: Fails  due to lack of  in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: I've reviewed the history of the article a bit and, as the nominator states, there have been efforts by both supporters and detractors to add information to the article but without sufficient |reliable sources to |verify article content.  At this stage, the subject of this article does not appear to meet notability criteria.  In the current political climate, that may change in the near future in which case the article can be recreated or restored (perhaps this is a case of Wikipedia:Too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)