Deletion of Equality (Titles) Bill

Comment: Clearly satisfies . It received significant coverage in a wide variety of high-quality sources between mid-2013 and early 2014. It has been less discussed since then, but it is not accurate to say it hasn't received any coverage since 2013. Here are a few examples of coverage in recent years: https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/06/05/feminist-meghan-markle-cant-be-happy-about-this-royal-law/, https://books.google.ca/books?id=8SA6DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT83&lpg=PT83&dq=%22Downton+Abbey+Law%22&source=bl&ots=QwE1VjUAYe&sig=ACfU3U02ZNcEh4z6QLZNxf2Ns95YKrqZ_A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDp7-359jkAhURMH0KHYX4CdM4HhDoATACegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=%22Downton%20Abbey%20Law%22&f=false, https://almatourism.unibo.it/article/view/4956, https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Wn6JDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT289&dq=%22Equality+(Titles)+Bill%22&ots=sriOYINTh_&sig=-WNlWGc936I1z_xM7hO-Upk6OCU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Equality%20(Titles)%20Bill%22&f=false. Moreover, the article is pretty well-written, well-referenced, and linked to by more than half a dozen mainspace articles. Deleting it would be doing a disservice to the encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)