Deletion of John E. Michel

Comment: Obviously those who have said he fails  haven't actually read it. He's a general officer so clearly meets criterion #3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: I am tempted to delete per consensus, but would like to see further admin input.  is slightly imprecise; a brigadier-general is of sufficiently high rank, but he appears never to have commanded significant forces '''in combat''', which the policy stipulates; commanding a training formation in Afghanistan may or may not qualify. He does not appear to satisfy  under any other criterion, given that the mere fact of his rank is not sufficient
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: Perhaps I am misreading it (I am no expert on military rank) but  would seem to cover this Brigadier General
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: as failing  and , as well as . Book may be notable, maybe not, but not sufficient anyway to give him notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)