Deletion of Joaquín Santiago

Comment: per , among other things. I'm not seeing anything particularly notable he's done, even if we take everything in the article at face value without proper sourcing. Having some association with Jose Feliciano fails due to . Not being a hoax (as yet unproven) wouldn't do it either. (However, we should hold off on the NOTMEMORIAL - the guy's still alive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I have written articles about pre-internet radio and vaudeville people such as Dan Daniels and Gustav Walter (impresario).  In my experience, it's always possible to turn up something online even if you're going back over 100 years.  If this can't be done for the subject then this indicates that they are not notable enough for our purposes.  Editors who are here because they are related to the subject or wish to promote Puerto Rican history have a blatant conflict-of-interest per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)