Deletion of Falk, Musicians (2nd nomination)

Comment: whatever the merits of the article, I would say it is still a conflict of interest. As  says, "You should not create or edit articles about yourself, ''your family'' or your close friends." (emphasis mine
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: The article has been improved significantly, and sources have been added in a way that I think meets otability as well as MUSIC. However, a lot of unreferenced information is still in the article, and I agree with ChrisTheDude in that it should be renamed Falk (band
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: The article has been edited by several other users to remove any "unencyclopedic twaddle" that was previously mentioned, leaving the article without bias. Therefore, there should not be any issue with who wrote the original page, since it has been edited by enough other users to leave only facts. Also, I have added sources onto the page to back up this information, including info on achievements that I believe meet both the |general notability and Wikipedia:Notability (music)|musician-specific notability guidelines. Per my comments earlier,Wikipedia:Notability (music)|musician-specific notability guidelines states that "A musician or ensemble may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria...has had a single or album on any country's national music chart" and "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network". Therefore, Falk meets the notability requirements because they have written songs that were certified platinum in Brazil and were featured on 2 nationally broadcasted, substantial TV networks.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)