Deletion of Arthur Kade

Comment: The references include a notable blog (Gawker.com), an in-depth audio interview by a very notable celebrity (Danny Bonaduce) that was broadcast live on a notable radio station (WYSP), and a feature article in a regionally significant and nationally recognized magazine (Philadelphia Magazine).  How does that not meet ?  -&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: the Bonaduce interview seems to me to fall under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS)

Comment: Fails the test of substantial coverage in impartial, reliable sources. Notable sources are not necessarily |reliable sources; and his mentions in Gawker in particular seem to owe a lot to their attitude toward Philadelphia vs. NYC. He clearly wants to be notable; that doesn't make it so. The one solid mention in one solid magazine is simply not sufficient to pass the test
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS)

Comment: Gawker coverage and Philli mag coverage push up to meeting , although barely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)