Deletion of Charles L. Burgreen

Comment: as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified above that together shows a pass of  so that deletion is unnecessary in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Beneath the surface, there's plenty of press coverage: see https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599716/burgreen-1/ 1, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599741/burgreen-2/ 2, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599790/burgreen-3/ 3, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599830/burgreen-4/ 4, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599845/burgreen-5/ 5, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599868/burgreen-6/ 6, and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/81599907/burgreen-7/ 7. While he may not have been the world's most noteworthy person, these sources amount to significant coverage, particularly considering 's statement that "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". Putting these sources together, we have more than enough to write a policy-compliant non-stub article, which means he's notable. ( makes an argument that bishops are automatically notable, but we needn't delve into that when the GNG is passed, as in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BISHOPS)

Comment: A one-sentence stub.  The coverage Extraordinary Writ has found is local and , a quarter of the population of any US state would be notable if that is considered sufficient.  Furthermore, it's not clear that the Episcopal Diocese of the Armed Services and Federal Ministries is equivalent to a regular diocese.  Several of those Episcopal bishops have been borderline cases with substantially better sourcing.  I don't think the presence of the magic word "bishop" justifies a keep, and don't see coverage to justify a keep either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: per  and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Clergy, so to state that there is "no consensus" is false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)