Deletion of John R Kennard

Comment: notability is not established in the article and the sources given are primary not secondary. A search for sources only yielded more primary ones or sources that don't pass . I did find an http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20101203/00176_013.html Oriental Daily article but I can't translate it sufficiently and besides it is only one article. More would be required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: From a traditionalist perspective, and looking at the historical record, headmasters of British public schools from the last century ''tend'' to end up passing  as they often had a Who's Who entry and/or obituary in The Times.  As I understand this school it is in the British tradition and I assume a member of the HMC, i.e. this is a quite prestigious public school, and so still not entirely  contrary to {{user|Bearian}}'s assertion.  However, I think we still need to go with .  This might pass  if sufficient sourcing can be found, but at present I do not think references are sufficient for a , so '''delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BLP)