Deletion of Russell Carhouse

Comment: 1) It is a heritage structure.  (2)''Toronto Life'' identified it as one of the four most popular venues during the annual Doors Open Toronto.  (3) It is an important part of the infrastructure that keeps Toronto running.  I was going to write that this is an ''"obvious"'' keep, except I realized that those who have asserted non-notability are also tacitly making claims of obviousness.  So, clearly it isn't obvious to them.  What they are failing to recognize is that important infrastructure, like this carhouse, if of interest to others -- ''including the writers who have written about the carhouses.''  Sorry, but the delete arguments, the ignoring of the reliable references, is a classic instance of one of the arguments in the essay rguments to avoid -- namely, ''"I don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: As fails ; I wondered if, as Toronto's second-oldest, it might have notability due to  "''historic, social, economic, or architectural importance''." But no third-party sourcing for this exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)