Deletion of List of winners of the Wallace Stevens Award

Comment: just like the other sub-articles of Academy of American Poets. The award looks http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Wallace+Stevens+Award%22&cf=all notable to me. And if |any person wins this award, it could be considered evidence of notability. And all of the winners have Wikipedia articles. The list on the official site counts as a reliable source. Nobody said Wikipedia ''was'' a mirror for the Academy of American Poets, and describing information available in a reliable source as a "mirror" is bizarre
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: reviewers are encouraged to examine any sources found in the article, as several continue to be added which are Wikipedia mirrors, non-, and press releases, none of which establish notability for the award nor contain any info on the award beyond what is in the lead (copied from Academy of American Poets) and the winner list which is already on the official website
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Show how deleting improves Wikipedia. Keeping it |improves Wikipedia because it informs people, and that's what we are here for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)