Deletion of Lance Sanderson

Comment: per  and . I can find no reliable sources for the subject other than a couple of news stories, in ''L'Express'' and ''El País'', about one incident. At a stretch it might be considered that the tabloid ''Daily Mail'' and ''Daily Mirror'' are reliable in this case, but they are also just news stories about this one incident. A wrong was done to this person that probably deserves publicity, but an encyclopedia is not the place for such publicity. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: clearly a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to Lance Sanderson controversy or similar.  I agree that the subject is notable only for a single event, and that  applies.  However, I think that the event may have enough coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gay-teen-catholic-homecoming_us_5604c66fe4b0768126fd09d3, http://www.teenvogue.com/story/catholic-school-refuses-lance-sanderson-same-sex-date-homecoming, http://www.mtv.com/news/2282218/christian-high-school-tennessee-gay-student-male-date-denied/, https://mic.com/articles/125991/catholic-school-suspends-gay-student-after-being-barred-from-bringing-homecoming-date#.424gWSBlX, http://wreg.com/2015/09/28/lance-sanderson-suspended-from-christian-brothers/, http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/30104559/cbhs-denies-homecoming-date-for-gay-student are all in the current article).  There are already similar articles about other incidents, such as 2010 Itawamba County School District prom controversy. The article at the moment is just advertising for his photography business, which is as far as I can tell not notable in the slightest.  The reason that he is at all notable is the prom controversy, and our article on wikipedia should reflect that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: to Lance Sanderson controversy. I agree with Caeciliusinhorto's statements; the event does appear to meet notability gudelines, but a biographical article seems inappropriate per . The current article does bring up strong concerns about , and a move would instead keep it on track to be about the notable event
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:PROMOTION)