Deletion of Municipal police (Romania)

Comment: The  and  are both met. Googling brings up plenty of potential sources: a http://www.cdep.ro/proiecte/2009/500/30/4/leg_pl534_09.pdf solid primary source and plenty of secondaries: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxiiy2012i1p78-81.html, http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/2047/2152#sdfootnote5sym, https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/compca/v11y2015i1p42-55.html, with more https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=local+police+romania&btnG= at Scholar - and that's without looking too hard. Overall, this is a disappointing nomination and I don't understand the nominator's rationale. The  arguments cut both ways - I don't understand what the existence of municipal police forces in other countries has to do with whether we should have an article on the municipal police of this country. Furthermore, the burden of proof in an AfD discussion lies with the nominator, but the nominator appears to have tried to reverse this in the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG||WP:OSE)