Deletion of Eurocracy

Comment: Wow, 3.3 rating on BGG? I haven't seen such a low rating in a long time. Anyway, thank you Timothy for finding some sources. My problem with https://euobserver.com/political/13592 is that it summarized the topic and makes some comments about non-game related politics, but does not tell us anything about the game - it is not a review, nor does it discuss who made it or why. It is very short and I'd argue -level coverage. https://boardgames.com/boardgame/eurocracy is clearly the product blurb/description, possibly provided by the producer, and the website is a store. This is not a review and it is likely not reliable or not independent. https://www.politico.eu/article/ban-on-eurocracy-in-bastion-of-democracy/ is just like 1, it does not provide any information about the game itself, the article is really not about the game but about its creator not being allowed to advertise it(?) in the EU official building. It is also very short. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: changed vote): Article does not meet . &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)