Deletion of Asia-1

Comment: A sitio is too small to satisfy  and be automatically notable, being a subdision of a barangay. Such subdivisions should "be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources". I don't see  here. A merge to Kapayapaan Village, Canlubang, the barangay of which it forms part might be merited, but that's a redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Topic satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: The single keep !vote here points to  as the ''only'' justification for this article's subject's notability. As a sitio, which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Asia-1 falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under , which it fails to meet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:GEOLAND says that places must meet  and have "non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" - as the one reference is an unreliable places of interest website (which includes a 7-Eleven in the list), the article does not meet the notability guideline, therefore, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)