Deletion of Mriganka Singh

Comment: No real reason why she might be notable. The article kept on referring her as the daughter of Hukum Singh, who until his death was a successful politician. This is really a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INVALIDBIO)

Comment: Fails  and . Candidates do not necessarily get articles for only being ''candidates''. They have to have done something notable. Also, this is a case of , since the article kept on referring to her as the daughter of Hukum Singh
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:INVALIDBIO)

Comment: Yup, as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at  is ''holding'' a notable office, not just running for one. But this makes no other claim that she has preexisting notability for other reasons independently of the candidacies, and is not referenced to any significant or substantive coverage ''about her'' for the purposes of establishing that her candidacy was special: seven of the eight footnotes just glancingly namecheck her existence in the process of being about other things, which means she isn't their ''subject'', and the only one that is "about" her is just a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself and her political opinions in the ''first'' person, of exactly the type that ''every'' candidate in ''every'' election ''always'' gets, which means it isn't enough to make her candidacy more special than everybody else's candidacies all by itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)