Deletion of Daniel Bernardi

Comment: as the rationale offered for deletion doesn't meet muster.  (a)  is for articles about musical recordings.  (b) The |notability guideline requires reliable sources over time, which this article has in spades.  (c) I'm having a difficult time finding '''un'''reliable sources in the article, much less vice-versa.  (d) Might it have a promotional tone?  Sure, but that's a job for {{tl|tone}}, not AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A9||WP:N)

Comment: Bad-faith nomination; no evidence that  was followed; no genuine policy-based reason to delete put forth by this "new" user
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: on account of total lack of inline citations. A well put-together text but ''that'' on its own cannot justify inclusion. If work is not done, the contested article becomes a case of |personal work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: After sorting through the extensive list of references and finding that more than half of them are unverifiable, are sources that quote Bernardi rather than being about Bernardi, or are publications by or interviews with Bernardi, I think the amount and depth of coverage that still remains in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Bernardi&oldid=870930191 this version is enough to support a pass of . The article still needs significant cleanup (in particular, there are no inline references indicating which claims of the article can be matched up against which sources) but it's not in bad enough shape for  to apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TNT)