Deletion of Drink while you think (relist nomination)

Comment: because  a collection of rules and instructions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per BBC coverage; encyclopedias have always included rules for notable games, and Wikipedia is  limited by the limitations of paper encyclopedias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I presume that in referring to  you are specifically talking about "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information", point 8?  This says, I quote - ''Instruction manuals - while Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instruction - advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, video game guides, and recipes.''  An article on this drinking game has the obvious potential to contain a) history and evolution of the game, b) its cultural significance, c) appearances in books, on TV shows, in films etc, and thus is more than simply a collection of rules (it doesn't matter if these things are not there or haven't been completed: the fact is, they could be inserted).  However, the rules need to be included as otherwise it would be impossible to give a clear idea of the game - and I presume you are not arguing that the entries for Chess and Soccer should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)