Deletion of Messina Hof (2nd nomination)

Comment: After reconsidering this article, I think it deserves to be kept. Although it was started by someone with a conflict of interest, it does not reed like it is full of , the point of view is fairly neutral, and does not read like an add (the article even includes a bit of controversy). |Ignoring the fact that the first author's intention was spamming, the winery has been the subject of multiple non-trivial coverage in secondary sources, thus meeting the standard in . I'm more ok with keeping this winery article than I would be with the Llano Estacado Winery article, which is the only other one in :category:Texas wineries.&nbsp;&ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:IAR||WP:ORG)

Comment: Complies with , although admittedly it could contain more diverse sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: over 500 Google news hits, combined with the fact that it seems to pass  would imply to me that it is notable and should be kept.  It's not perfect, but I think it's notable enough to merit inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I also feel this version of the article does not appear to be  and meets our guidelines for inclusion.  I would be interested to compare it to the version that was voted delete in the last AfD or even the versions that were speedied.  Granted the original author came here paid by his client to create the article, but part of  is being up front with your COI which is supposed to lend you a little credibility.  Although the http://www.infoworld.com/t/applications/microsoft-pays-wikipedia-edits-043 Microsoft incident should be a warning to all not to pay someone to update your article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:COI)

Comment: The article not only passes  but even the |Wine Projects slightly more strict RIES interpretation of winery notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:WINE||WP:WINERIES)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)