Deletion of Death Valley Driver Video Review (5th nomination)

Comment: fails  for lack of reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject has not been documented in |significant, independent reliable sources. All the sources in the article are either unreliable, tangential, non-independent, or irrelevant. I will provide specific analysis of each source if necessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject appears to have  |significant coverage in |reliable third party sources. There is a fairly large number of book sources as well, suggesting that there may be addtional offline coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IRS)

Comment: as I'm not convinced  criteria 1 ("''The content itself has been the subject of '''multiple non-trivial''' published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes '''reliable''' published works in all forms''" - emphasis my own) is met by the cited blogs and references by internet wrestling writers. It should also be noted that the IGN ref is from 2000 (i.e. before the time that Wikipedia came to regard IGN as reliable). As pointed out earlier in this AFD, quality of references is more important that quantity when assessing notability. Clearly criteria 2 and 3 of  are not met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: No significant coverage from reliable sources treating the subject in detail, as required by the |general notability deadline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This topic likely won't be covered extensively in reliable sources, yet some exist. Perhaps time for article improvements, per  would be more appropriate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM)