Deletion of Rishab Shetty

Comment: The subject passes , albeit on the weaker side. Source examples include, but are not limited to: {{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/kannada/Making-Ricky/2016/01/16/article3229349.ece|title=Making Ricky|work=The New Indian Express}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/reviews/Ricky-Review-Rishabs-Debut-Lives-up-to-its-Promise/2016/01/24/article3239818.ece|title=Ricky Review: Rishab's Debut Lives up to its Promise|work=The New Indian Express}}, {{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/Some-Vedane-and-Some-Bhavane-for-Rishab-Shetty/articleshow/38136678.cms|title=Some Vedane and Some Bhavane for Rishab Shetty|work=The Times of India}}, {{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/From-debutant-director-Rishab-Shetty-now-turns-costume-designer-for-Rikki/articleshow/41097973.cms|title=Rishab Shetty now turns costume designer for Rikki|work=The Times of India}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-will-haripriya-get-an-award-for-her-performance-in-ricky-2134043|title=Will Haripriya get an award for her performance in 'Ricky'?|date=12 October 2015|work=Daily News and Analysis}}. Importantly, note that per , topic |notability is based upon ''source availability'', rather than the state of sourcing in articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NEXIST||WP:N)

Comment: as a brand new article wished deleted six minutes after being authored and while undergoing active editing.  Shame.  We have a suitable stub BLP whose topic meets  and  (thanks {{u|Northamerica1000}} for sharing the obvious and being |pro-active). The {{u|Crystallizedcarbon|nominator}} and {{u|SwisterTwister}} should remember that articles are not to be |judged per appearance or per being |new or per being https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rishab_Shetty&type=revision&diff=701083918&oldid=701079847 originally poorly sourced, as topic notability is to be determined through |sources being available, used or not. A lack of  and |WP:IMPATIENCE with brand new contributions is never helpful
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:HANDLE||WP:UGLY||WP:BITE||WP:NEXIST||WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPATIENT)

Comment: Thank you {{ping|Northamerica1000}} I agree that the sources you pointed out do establish the notability of this BLP. Since the next issue was |verifiability I sourced what I could in the article and tagged the rest. Even if the information that requires citation is eliminated the article would still be a viable stub, so I change my vote to keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)