Deletion of Reactions to the July 2016 Kabul bombing

Comment: effectively the same thing). (1) At time of writing, this page and the main article are very short and splitting off is definitely not justified. See . (2) This is clearly just the latest in a long line of attempts by list-junkies to exhaustively document all the standard predictable condemnations/commiserations, "in case they might be useful in the future", which is not what WP is for. See . The significant statements should be merged back into the main article, the rest deleted. I'm happy to note that an intelligent precedent has recently been set at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2016 Nice attack. (3) The last bit of the nomination rationale is clearly facetious and tasteless and should be ignored, or preferably fixed up by the nominator.  &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT||WP:NOTEVERYTHING)

Comment: to July 2016 Kabul bombing.  With real empathy for Nom's point.  I presume that this is , a nomination intended to bring up our failure to adequately cover Islamist attacks on Muslim targets.  But the taraget article is not overlarge.  Until/unless that article become excessively long, there is no justificaiton for a separate article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)