Deletion of The Thing That Wouldn't Die

Comment: per above comments, established sources, 's direct recommendation ''against'' deletion, and based on past assertions by nominator and Eusebeus that redirects are a better solution than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:EPISODE)

Comment: Sources demonstrate it meets |notability and, with a little clean-up, it can easily meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:EPISODE)

Comment: I see a big fat #PLOT|plot summary and a cast list; the externs are to notoriously non-|reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS)

Comment: and all the above arguments are junk. The article fails the real-world standard for fictional material per ; it is #PLOT and . Garnering reviews is hardly an assertion of notability that requires an individual article beyond the main one on the series itself. Where is the real-world context that makes this worth retaining on its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:NOT||WP:TRIVIA)