Deletion of MySpace Secret Shows

Comment: as pretty blatant violation of  and certainly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:ATT)

Comment: No sources shown outside it self () Not verifiable outside of itself . Burden in on author to show with external sources how it is notable. If the author needs time to present sources please give him that and I will remove my vote as not enough time has really been given. However if he is arguing that in its current state it is somehow self-notable, then it must be deleted because it's not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: If it's secret, then there's no way for us Muggles to find out about it, right?  So it should fail , right?  And anyway the whole article reads like an ad, right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)

Comment: unless third party references can be produced to establish the |notability of it. The idea that "it is notable for bringing great bands to small towns" is subjective in more ways than one, and isn't in line with any of our notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: unless totally rewritten - violates ,  ''and''  in its current state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:ADVERT||WP:WEB)