Deletion of Water (data page)

Comment: I am not convinced that deletion is OK for reason of .  gives a nice background for this argument (concluding into 'keep' here, IMO). The data is quite structured. And this being water, such lots of data may be relevant. With this, I think the data is encyclopedic (while one could consider improvement of the page). Now for practical reasons, mostly web-originated, the data is not added to the main article. That is, we have not found a sound way to manage such a big page by web means. We could use improvements in this (i.e., high end webpage design guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:DISCRIMINATE)