Deletion of Pahonia (disambiguation)

Comment: valid dab page.  The arguments for deletion appears to be that Lithuanians don't like this name.  Well, that comes under .  As long as the name is used at the target article, the dab entry is justified.  Even if the Lithuanian coat of arms entry was removed there would still be a case for the existence of a dab page since there are three other entries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: From the close of the RfC (and a very quick glance at the discussion), I see that the decision there was for the article Pahonia to be turned into a redirect, with the implied assumption that the redirect target is the |primary topic for the term (otherwise, Pahonia would have been turned into a disambiguation page). Now, even if there is one primary topic, there are three other topics with the name, and as along as we have content about them we need to provide navigation to those topics. Deletion of this dab page would be possible only if this navigation is provided instead by a hatnote at the primary title (with three entries, that would be too much), or if all existing content about those other topics is deleted from the encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:PTOPIC)