Deletion of Steve Urkel

Comment: I will freely admit that I didn't actually read the listed sources in the article, but, based on their titles alone, they are significant and seem to be in reliable sources. I couldn't read the NYT piece before they threw a pay-wall in my face, but the little I got looked like a source of use.  Much as it warms the cockles of my heart to see articles on insignificant trivia consigned to the bitbin of the internet, ''this'' character was noticed and discussed by reliable sources.  Oh that even a tenth of the fictional characters currently on wikipedia had even a tenth the source support he seems to. I haven't looked at the article very hard, so it might need some , but I suspect that such drastic measures aren't needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:NUKEIT)

Comment: Clear notability indicated by such sources as ''African Americans on Television: Race-ing for Ratings'' page 163, ''Historical Dictionary of African American Television'' page 157, and others. The article lacks references, but  and it can be fixed into a solid article with some effort
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: While I don't think many articles on fictional characters pass , this one clearly does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)