Deletion of Manuela Testolini

Comment: Two seconds of Google News searching yields http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SJ&s_site=mercurynews&p_multi=SJ&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1186D93374A664C0&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-17376453_ITM http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-115196542.html http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/17/fashion/17skin.html?_r=1&oref=slogin http://www.in-forum.com/archive/purchases/?page=view&type=active_paper&id=299524 http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-114756585.html, which is just the tip of the iceberg. If this article does not develop more than a stub we can merge to Prince, but this topic is incontestably notable in its own right. Delete !votes that fail to address the |potential, not just current state of the article do not carry any weight. Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: I have no clue why this was nominated but it should not have been. Well sourced, well known person. Passes . All the article needs is a cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)