Deletion of Geomancy of Divinity

Comment: Article's only reference does not come close to meeting |Wikipedia referencing standards.  The article is basically an essay full of a lot of...er...unusual claims that appear to be |original research.  |Notability for this...uh...theory is not asserted, much less |verifiable, and the whole load of boll...um...that is...information is presented as fact when it is clearly FT|someone's theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOR||WP:N||WP:V||WP:NFT)

Comment: No |original research means ''no original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: you say , and yet we keep Space opera in Scientology scripture.  Just a thought.  You shouldn't marginalize it just because it's new-age and not mainstream.  If notability and verifiability can be establish, it should be kept without prejudice
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)