Deletion of Userbar

Comment: the phenomenon is clearly notable, and I think the large quantity of unreliable sources makes it sufficiently verifiable. Searching http://www.google.com/search?q=userbar+tutorial 'userbar tutorial' on Google yields hundreds (thousands?) of tutorials listing pretty much the same specifications &mdash; although nearly all of them are on forums/blogs/etc. I think we should invoke |common sense here, because although these sites would not be |reliable sources individually, there's so many of them stating basically the same thing. There's also the http://www.userbars.be/faq userbars.be FAQ that I've referenced in the article, which can probably be considered a more reliable source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMON||WP:RS)

Comment: I'm also gonna quote the  and common sence here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: I agree the article is not a particularly good one, however there are sources for notability and content - as listed at the Open Directory link.   So it is not. imo, , however it does need an {{tl|unsourced}} tag
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)