Deletion of James M. Cahill

Comment: The notability test for mayors is not an arbitrary population-of-the-city cutoff. A mayor's notability lives or dies on the quality and depth and range of his ''sourcing'', not on how many people he happens to govern — 56K is certainly large enough that an article ''could'' be kept if it were substantive and well-sourced, but 56K is not an "inherent" notability freebie that would ''exempt'' a mayor's article from having to be substantive and well-sourced just because it's technically possible to verify that he exists. But the only sourcing shown here at all is the city's own |self-published website about itself, not notability-supporting |reliable source coverage in real media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SELFPUB||WP:RS)

Comment: Mayor of a city with a population of 56,000. No notable accomplishments. Fails  ''Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.'' routine coverage in local news for things like this: https://www.broadwayworld.com/new-jersey/article/New-Brunswick-Performing-Arts-Center-to-Break-Ground-on-170-Million-23-Story-Project-20170929 NB Performing Arts groundbreaking Surprising that a long term pol can manage to fly under the radar for this long
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)