Deletion of Rodney Power Station

Comment: The article's subject has been covered by multiple reliable sources independent of the subject itself, and it thus meets . These sources include Radio New Zealand (https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regional/278228/genesis-axes-rodney-power-station-plan 1, https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/52622/genesis-clears-final-legal-barriers-to-power-station 2), the ''New Zealand Herald'' (https://www.webcitation.org/69yPmphzd?url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10548426 1, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/gas-pipeline-too-close-to-our-homes-say-farmers/PS6ZHTH5SUTB7CY5VUME6Z6ZBE/ 2, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/battle-over-power-station-going-to-supreme-court/4THQ4LQIZVYZUTZNHW3O3H6BHA/ 3), ''Stuff'' (https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/2297180/Moving-closer-to-Rodney-power-station 1), and trade magazine Oil and Gas today (https://www.oilandgastoday.com.au/new-zealand-the-land-of-the-long-white-gas/ 1). It also appears to have generated a New Zealand Supreme Court https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2008/sc-94-2007-greenpeace-new-zealandinc-v-genesis-power.pdf case involving Greenpeace. The sources make it seem notable, in line with , and I think that the supreme court case adds to the notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)