Deletion of Occupy Sacramento

Comment: Topic immediately passes the top notability guideline, '''. Also, per , notability is not temporary, and once a topic has received significant coverage, it does not require ongoing coverage to establish notability. I've added more information and references to the Occupy Sacramento article. The general notability guideline makes no mention regarding number of arrests during an event, things that occur during an event, etc. as consideration for article inclusion or exclusion. Also, topic notability is based upon the ''availability'' of reliable sources, and not sourcing or content in the articles themselves
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTEMP)

Comment: #NEWSPAPER|Wikipedia is NOT a NEWSPAPER. Listen again! #NEWSPAPER|Wikipedia is NOT a NEWSPAPER. Read under #2: "News reports". This article is written like a news report, and this is non-notable. You can argue that this article is notable by 1) the number of arrests; while it is large compared to other "Occupy" protests, all the value it adds to the article is just a fancy number on a fancy event in a protest. 2) You could also argue that the number of participants is significant - 200, but compared to Occupy Boston, it's nothing. 3) The article is practically made up only of a short lede, what a protester said, an infobox, and information on arrests, which is pretty shallow depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)