Deletion of Albania–Netherlands relations

Comment: 1) On the basis of |past outcomes, almost all bilateral relations between European countries articles have been kept. (2) The Netherlands appears to have been instrumental in the independence of Albania, as it was for the United States; its early recognition paved the way for other nations' bilateral relations. (3) There is a lot more to be added, and this can be rescued
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I'm not certain that the Dutch participation in the International Gendarmerie constitutes either a war or an alliance in the sense intended by the Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations#Bilateral relations|WikiProject guideline.  The Great Powers ambassadors chose the Netherlands for the police mission in Albania ''specifically because'' there was no treaty relationship between the countries; the Dutch were considered neutral in Albanian affairs, and -- as far as I can tell from available sourcing -- that participation engendered no lasting alliance; the Dutch simply went home when they were done.  By means of comparison, and at the risk of , I don't think there's a risible claim to an Iran-Sweden relations article, although Sweden performed exactly the same role in what was then Persia, at the same time.  Nor does the revolt in Albania during the Dutch Military Mission constitute in any real sense a "war" between Albania and the Netherlands.  Certainly, there are no evident sources that claim it does.  If I misunderstood the intent of the guideline conditions, I'd certainly be open to re-evaluating this position, but at the moment, I just don't see how this meets the standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST)