Deletion of Augmental homology

Comment: as |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This appears to be a very obscure topic. Wikipedia isn't the place for the author to make his theory known to the whole world. If his theory has merit, then it will eventually gain citations, secondary sources, and only then will it pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: None of this has been published by reliable sources (which indeed makes it ).  It has already been alleged that the obscure technical report from the University of Stockholm constitutes a reliable source; however, these kinds of reports are often only minimally peer-reviewed, if at all.  In any even, the technical report in question does not appear to have made any impact at all, since it is indexed by neither MathSciNet nor Google Scholar.  In addition to r.e.b.'s MathSciNet search, the only hits for "augmental homology" on the http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22augmental+homology%22&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=800000000001&as_sdtp=on scholar search are |self-published articles by G. Fors, the apparent author of the article in question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SPS)

Comment: until a better case is made for deletion.  This isn't apparently , but it may not be notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: There is some confusion as to whether this is OR, since the author admitted that this was "original research" in the ''non-Wikipedia'' sense. But this admission, combined with the fact that the main article ("On the Foundation of Algebraic Topology") is self-published means this ''is''  in the Wikipedia sense. Remember, since ''we'' do not carry out a peer review, we must only include content that has already been peer-reviewed. Oh, and to say "the deletion of the page will most likely result in the loss of a competent topology editor," is a rather poor argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:original research)