Deletion of JP Turner & Company

Comment: the 3 cites given are pro-forma state web links from New Jersey, still |got good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I have found three websites, which can be considered reliable and independent of JP Turner, in which JP Turner is the subject, and where it is receiving non-trivial coverage: http://www.jerseyfsc.org/the_commission/general_information/public_statements/JPTurnerCompany.asp, http://www.state.nj.us/oag/ca/press/jpturner.htm, and http://www.nj.gov/oag/newsreleases06/pr20061019c.html.  It may be argued that these three websites mean that the article on JP Turner & Company meets .  However, can the article be kept on the basis of three judicial websites describing criminal actions by the company?  I am not sure, so I would like to know what other people think
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Article was created by a single purpose account, and most of the edits have been made by SPAs, including {{Userlinks|J.P. Turner Official}}.  There is a single link at the bottom to an independent source (businessweek.com), but it is their directory of all companies, and therefore not significant coverage.  Thus, no SIGNIFICANT coverage in independent sources, which is what the relevant |notability guideline requires
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)