Deletion of Ellen Johnson

Comment: Yet another bad faith nomination/ violation from Gastrich
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: to stop |point making.  We do not delete articles because the nominator dislikes the views on religion of the article's subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per  and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jason Gastrich
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Clearly''' notable person. However, the opinions and reasons given so far are not at all convincing: 50,000 Google hits (meagre), mention in the media (mostly without references ), prez of a notable org, people might want to know (). No books or other publications mentioned. Come on folks! There must be more. I will come back if I find something
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NOR)

Comment: as blatant violation of .  Also, the nominator of this article has a currently ongoing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jason Gastrich|RFC and his motives are clearly suspect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per  and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jason Gastrich
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: not a speedy);  nomination of a perfectly notable person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)