Deletion of Sarat Kumar Rai

Comment: As a member of the Bengal Legislative Council, he is presumed to be notable under . The "completely unsourced" rationale for deletion no longer holds true, and a Google search is inadequate for a historical figure who flourished 1900-1946 in a part of the world where most sources could be expected to be in Bengali instead of English
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Does the subject receive in-depth significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent secondary sources? '''In-depth ''' means the subject receives comprehensive and thorough coverage. '''Significant''' means the subject receives more than routine coverage but is sufficiently great or important to be worthy of attention. We all know what reliable, independent and secondary is. '''Multiple''' doesn't simply mean more than one, numerically. It actually means the subject receives separate coverage in more than one source as presented from different angles. If five reliable sources all report the same thing it is considered ONE source according to . The subject of this article fails , Wikipedia's notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: unsourced article that questionably would even meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)