Deletion of List of fictional military organizations (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and  and per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:SALAT)

Comment: per  and , some categorization may be |original research as well. Again, "fictional something" is too vague a criterion to make the list manageable. Could possibly be split into more manageable separate list articles (e.g. military orgs in tv series, books, games
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:IINFO||WP:OR)

Comment: as a useful list for organization and navigation, primary deletion criteria appears to be  which is not convincing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: A lot of the problems could be solved by "normal editing", but the list would look nothing like what it does now.  This list is |indiscriminate, |unsourced, and divided along |editor classifications.  Who is to say that there is a commonality between the Tau in Warhammer 40,000 and a fictional company in a WWII game?  How many of these links in this article are redirects and how many entries in this list aren't individual notable elements?  Who determines what a fictional terrorist organization is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: Where to start, there are so many problems with this article.  Falls foul of , ,  and  for starters.  Doesn't conform to policy see .  Looking at the original delete discussion, none of the promise improvements have materialised.  Much better served by a category than a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:UNDUE||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:WAF)

Comment: fails , with no citations provided to demonstrate these are indeed what they claim to be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Maybe it's me, but I am not understanding where  comes into play here. For instance, I don't see how listing that the Terran Federation, which is the centerpiece of the famous novel (later films) ''Starship Troopers'', is considered original research. The same can be said about most of the other items in this list. I also think this can be improved by making this a list of lists and '''splitting''' this into other, smaller, and more maintainable lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)