Deletion of Andrzej Sztando

Comment: does not meet any criterion of . I don't have an h-index calculator any more, as it required using Chrome, which I won't do; but based on https://scholar.google.it/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Andrzej+Sztando&btnG= this page, I estimate his at 7 (someone please correct me if I am wrong). https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.person.hindex.html This page lists the 2577 economists with the highest h-index; the highest "score" is 90, the lowest is 14. Sztando does not have a full professorship, has not received a major academic award, etc. The page may be "nicely written", but is simply https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Andrzej+Sztando&oldid=&use_engine=0&use_links=0&turnitin=0&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ue.wroc.pl%2Fpracownicy%2Fandrzej_sztando.html a copy of his bio (suitably licenced, so no copyright violation). As far as I can see, there's no coverage ''whatsoever'' in |independent reliable sources here (again, do please correct me if I'm wrong), so  is not met. Almost all the "references" are in fact his own publications; once those and the copied content are removed there's nothing left. His self-written bio belongs on his university webpage, where it already is, and not here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm no fan of , in fact, I Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)/Archive 9#Modification of the last paragraph in the lead|unsuccessfully tried to get it altered so it would have to be subservient to GNG.  But, :wikt:rules is rules|rules is rules and consensus is clear that  serves a valuable function on Wikipedia.  Sztando meets criterion 2 of |the aforementioned guideline, by virtue of being a Medal for Long Service recipient.  My decline was based solely on advertisement and while there are undertones of puffery left, they can be easily ironed out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:NACADEMIC)