Deletion of Michael Bartosh

Comment: he doesn't fail . However, the obituary part may need to be removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: subject is obviously sufficiently notable according to  guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: O'Reilly books are usually big sellers, so I think that alone is probably enough to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I disagree that this article passes . I found no evidence of multiple non-trivial publications written about him.  For those who contend that he ''does'' meet , please explain why
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Meets io
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: It is rather ludicrous to suggest this is a bad faith nomination.  , but it '''is''' odd that he suddenly gets a write up after he passes away.  Apparently nobody in the Mac community felt he was article worthy when he was actually writing all those books that qualify him under ?  As a content issue, suggest removing the obit at the end as it isn't really appropriate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BIO)