Deletion of Saffron Barker

Comment: The subject is getting plenty of press coverage such as the https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/0/youtubers-like-saffron-barker-killing-traditional-tv-do-care/ Daily Telegraph and so seems to pass  and .   The BBC have invited her onto Strictly as a "social media star" (rather than as a professional dancer) and it is clearly their view that she is already a celebrity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per  and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:GNG)

Comment: the refs don't add up to notability. It may be just  but she certainly isn't notable yet. '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: to Strictly Come Dancing. Many of the references identified above are indeed RS, but they all identify her in context of being a contestant on the show. It's fairly Routine type coverage. Maybe it could change, as noted above, but that's just 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Notability is lacking. Subject of this   article has no more inherent notability than thousands of other internet figures. Numbers of "likes" or "followers" on social media or YouTube is not criteria for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Does not pass . There is no in-depth coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COISELF||WP:PROMO||WP:GNG)