Deletion of Roy Sebag

Comment: does not meet ; sources are not independent / . Affiliated with one blue-linked company (BitGold) which, with $13M & similar SPIP sources does not appear to be notable itself. Content is advertorial in nature and cannot be helped since the subject is non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:SPIP)

Comment: I've gone through the sources in the article and on this talk page and I did some limited source-searching. While Sebag has been quite prolific in arranging |promotional interviews, proper sourcing and notability is not a series of "''According to source Sebag said XYZ about his business/industry''". Notability requires multiple independent sources writing significant coverage ''about'' the subject, and that is systematically lacking here. Given his success in arranging promotional interviews, there's a decent chance that some sources will write about him in the near future. If future sources are shown significantly writing about Sebag, it may be possible to restore the article for improvement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)

Comment: I note you don't provide your former identity, Anon IP. I unintentionally misspelled Sebag - I note how big a deal you make of it, no offense intended. Thank you for your comments. Your comment ''"The second article is reflecting that Sebag's company won a pretty serious award for technology innovation of the year. As the founder and largest shareholder, that award was obviously received by him."'' is the opposite of our guideline . Your continued assertion that mentions-in-passing of Sebag (regardless of whether the mention calls him a douchebag or a brainchild) is not "significant coverage" and fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BASIC)