Deletion of Virtuozzo (company)

Comment: The referenced text is predominantly routine coverage about ownership changes (much concerning the period as :SWsoft, making it also debatable whether two articles are worthwhile if this article survives?). My own searches are not locating  coverage of the company. Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:GNG)

Comment: Per above, about half of current refs border on primary / fail . Just pulled a lengthy ut of scope from SWsoft and tagged for advertising. I was initially leaning delete but a quick search of G-News sans "(company)" displays several recent refs http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/450416837/Persistent-container-storage-vendors-take-center-stage here and https://venturebeat.com/2016/05/26/virtuozzo-partners-with-bitnami-to-offer-service-providers-of-all-sizes-access-to-major-applications/ here as well as http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/05/13/virtuozzo-reveals-plans-to-double-down-on-containers/ Silicon, http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/How-to-achieve-optimum-performance-in-a-hybrid-cloud CW and http://www.geekwire.com/2016/virtuozzo-7/ Geekwire. Also caught https://xakep.ru/2016/10/21/virtuozzo-interview/ links in http://ko.com.ua/virtuozzo_storage_infrastruktura_hraneniya_postoyannyh_dannyh_v_produktivnyh_docker-sredah_115918 Russian and http://www.ciotimes.com/IT/120387.html Chinese amongst routine spammy pr. Needs to differentiate between product v. company as this causes convoluted confusion & cut down advertisement throughout
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:O)

Comment: as ''Find sources'':https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Virtuozzo%22 books; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Virtuozzo%22 scholar; https://www.highbeam.com/Search?searchTerm=%22Virtuozzo%2222 HighBeam negates |Not Inherited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)