Deletion of ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy

Comment: per my past statements at AfD and per Umbralcorax.  I could easily argue that it is not notable: it is just a |flash in the pan and another example of |conservatives kicking a dead horse named ACORN.  I'd tag it for  and , move on, and nominate it again in two months
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:STICK||WP:POV||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: masses of sources to meet . The point about recentism hangs on whether there are longer term consequences. Already a number of significant political actions have been taken and and my judgement is that the implications will still be covered by reliable sources in future months
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)