Deletion of Gautam Rajput

Comment: per Sitush, with the caveats on questionable reliability of some sources they stated, I agree that there is likely enough to satisfy , , , etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: per the references in the article which in aggregate satisfy . Here's one I added: {{cite book |chapter=Aspects of Agrarian Uprisings in North India in the Early Eighteenth Century|title=The Mughal State 1526-1750 |editor=Muzaffar Alam |editor2=Sanjay Subrahmanyam  |author=Muzaffar Alam  |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-0195652253 |page=461-463 |url=https://archive.org/stream/in.ernet.dli.2015.129954/2015.129954.The-Mughal-State-1526-1750_djvu.txt}} which discusses the grants to the clan, the growing military strength in the region, the conversion of the chief to Islam after a failed plot and the founding of communities, markets and construction of improvements such as a canal by his sons and descendants. Special:Contributions/24.151.116.12|24.151.116.12
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: just to save the time of those unfamiliar with the subject area, please note that sources from or before the British Raj era are not considered to be reliable, nor is the "states" series of ''The People of India'' (which plagiarises those sources) or the joshuaproject website. Similarly, there is a long-standing consensus that caste-affiliated websites, such as indianrajputs.com, are not reliable, mainly due to their POV-pushing nature. Obviously, open wikis such as jatland.com fail  also. This probably is not an exhaustive list of problematic sources but it's a start - {{u|Johnuniq}} did suggest at a recent AfD that I should create something, perhaps in userspace, for this purpose - consider this as a part of what will be that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)