Deletion of Wayman Mitchell

Comment: in totality there is enough reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion to pass  particularly as sources do not have to be directly about him but include information about him such as articles and books that are mainly about the church but have coverage of him as well so he does qualify for a stand-alone article, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and  - churches can be notable by the number of adherents, number of clergy/employees, and other ''objective'' indicia. Clergy are not automatically notable. I don't see  for this person. The article is a hash of personal items, |soapboxing or evangelism, and just plain poor English writing. We are a non-sectarian charity, not a free web host for evangelism. I do not oppose a redirect, as we have done for assistant bishops, monsignors, canons, and similar Christian clergy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TNT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SOAP)