Deletion of The seven spirits of god

Comment: as  and . Editor admits that he is the author using his own book as the source. Note that on his talk page he has tried to edit the article but it keeps being reverted by bots; he has pasted a revised version there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:OR)

Comment: per nom. No . Should probably be '''speedy''' per {{tl|db-nocontext}} and/or {{tl|db-spam}}. May also be  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Is an |OR exegetical essay with strong POV-push, not an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This new theology based on numerology falls squarely within the core definition of |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Author pushing his own book so that's  sorted. If it's his own book then it's . The chances are that if it's written by the author from his own book then it's most probably a .  It probably also needs a {{notenglish|Gobbledy-gook}} tag. Given its subject matter it probably also contravenes  too. Not only that it's got indented paragraphs thereby making it virtually unreadable, they also make me suspect that it's been copied and pasted from somewhere too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:OR||WP:COPYVIO||WP:SOAPBOX)