Deletion of CryEngine 3

Comment: per nom: software, especially gaming software, has a tendancy to vaporware|turn into vapor and never become released. Not saying that's the case here, but we just don't know here (thus ). Special:Contributions/Bahamut0013|spǝǝp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Agreed, the article needs cleanup as well as expansion. I would expand on it myself but I haven't read the |manual of style yet and don't want to create style-correcting work for people. Admittedly, I'm not being very |bold in that respect, but it's hard to be |bold when http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CryEngine_3&diff=281291209&oldid=280328904 people delete your contributions right after you write them rather than tagging them for cleanup
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS||WP:BOLD||WP:BOLD)

Comment: although the unsigned argument of DanielDiebler seems a bit weak to me (WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:GOOGLE, WP:IKNOWIT), as Sabre has highlighted there are enough independent non-trivial |reliable sources covering the engine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: That the software is unreleased is irrelevant, as is the fact that nothing has been tied to the technology yet - it has no impact on the |notability. Importance, maybe, but that's an entirely separate issue. There's a fair bit of coverage out there for this. CRYSTAL only applies with the absence of sources, and while I don't usually go with posting Google results, http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=cryengine+3&btnG=Search&meta= just look. Joystiq, Kokatu, IGN, GameSpot, CVG, GamePro, Eurogamer, and more covering the announcement, plus features including interviews and development progress in substantive detail (ie not trivial coverage). It ''is'' early days yet for the engine, so there isn't much variation between sources at this time, but the information is there none-the-less. Worst case scenario is a merge (not a plain redirect) to Crytek, but I don't believe that to be necessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The engine isn't in early development and it's extremely unlikely to be abandoned given it's pedigree and how near to completion it is. It's the latest version of a very notable engine. It is difficult to have an open discussion about game engines without someone mentioning the CryEngine. It's the proverbial "Joneses" of engines always brought up when discussing real time graphics. To see how far into to development it is, watch the CryEngine 3 GDC 2009 Presentation. Deleting this article would be pointless, because it would need to be recreated in the near future. Google News currently returns "about 265" results for the exact phrase "cryengine 3". Chzz, it may be helpful for you to reread 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)