Deletion of Gertrud Schiller

Comment: per evidence cited by others. I am convinced that she meets . In my experience translating from de to enwiki, just looking at de content for notability is really not enough. Though one of the larger wikipedias, de is a much smaller community with far fewer articles. There is a real chance that an article subject (including this one) is actually 'more' notable than de would make it seem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The page needs to be developed, yes, but there is no question about the fact that the subject of the article is notable. Passes . There are many books, essays as well as Wikipedia articles that cite her work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets  in the typical way that a scholar of the humanities does. In addition to the above points, her ''Ikonographie der christlichen Kunst'' has been reviewed in profusion: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41371052https://www.jstor.org/stable/41370825https://www.jstor.org/stable/24161104https://www.jstor.org/stable/24175251https://www.jstor.org/stable/27688112https://www.jstor.org/stable/23893027https://www.jstor.org/stable/25824550, after which I stopped counting. This more than clears the bar for notability per . It's also been cited in excess of a thousand times, once you add up the different editions, printings, translations, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)