Deletion of Joseph Uscinski

Comment: Multiple reliably-published reviews for multiple published books should be enough for , and he also got major media attention for the dog story. The current version of the article has  issues but that's hardly a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:REFPUNCT)

Comment: the claim being made for notability is  as the subject fits two of the seven criteria: 1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources; and 7. The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. The subject need only fit one of the seven
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: as ; multiple published books with non-trivial reviews. Sample review from ''Political Science Quarterly'' (Wiley-Blackwell). Date: September 1, 2015
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: unsure if the claim being made for notability is  or , but the deletion is . The article is low-quality and no amount of references to news articles (many of which appear to be references to his work, rather than to him personally) will improve the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR||WP:FRINGE||WP:TNT)