Deletion of Hunter Douglas

Comment: I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hunter_Douglas&diff=545687648&oldid=544528273 removed some puffery from the article that may indicate that it was written by an editor with a |conflict of interest
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Passes . Source examples include http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/stories/2009/02/16/newscolumn1.html, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-corporate/hunter-douglas-wins-delhi-airport-order/article1044961.ece?ref=archive, http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/hunter-douglas-to-add-22-galleries-by-2012-110110200035_1.html, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DP&p_theme=dp&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0FABC2D06E70F94A&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DP&p_theme=dp&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB1DB3BD54B71E7&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: This business makes window hangings and blinds, I take it.  I think it's safe to assume that a source that calls its subject ''the world's leading'' anything is not really an |independent source.  The presence of a completely |original research and |unverified corporate history suggests that |conflicted editing.  No showing of the sort of |significant impact on history, technology, or culture that would turn this from a merely successful business into an |encyclopedia subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:COI||WP:SIGCOV||WP:N)