Deletion of Traingate (2nd nomination)

Comment: as an obvious case of #NEWS, as should have been done when this was first created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: meets , coverage over an extended period of time from |reliable sourcess, to trim or not to trim (that is the question:)), is irrelevant to this afd and should be discussed at the Talk:Traingate|talkpage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT||WP:RS)

Comment: coverage in reliable sources from the years after the incident occurred are trivial to find. For example https://books.google.pl/books?id=4TcnDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT473&dq=%22Jeremy+Corbyn%22+%22traingate%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiJhqPhvdTiAhUSfFAKHW2wAUgQ6AEIOzAD#v=onepage&q=%22Jeremy%20Corbyn%22%20%22traingate%22&f=false it was the subject of an entire chapter in a 2017 book about Richard Branson and https://books.google.pl/books?id=8wZQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT620&dq=%22Jeremy+Corbyn%22+Virgin+train&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixyceRv9TiAhUysaQKHST7D_wQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q=Virgin%20train&f=false several pages of this 2018 book on Corbyn's career. Indeed, "Traingate" as a political phenomenon lasted for over a year since the incident occurred in 2016 https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-41036937 but Virgin's release of footage of the incident occurred in 2017. Per  once gained notability cannot be lost, and so it is with this incident - it received  coverage over a period of years and, having become notable, will never become "not notable" due to the page being dormant. Also,  is not a good reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NEGLECT)