Deletion of HD 23356

Comment: the star gets brief mentions in a few papers, but there's not the significant coverage needed to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This seems to be a prototypical example of the "being mentioned alongside other similar objects, such as in a table of properties" clause of . Like the nominator, I could not find any non-incidental coverage of this star. I don't think 46ly is close enough to be interesting for its closeness, it's somewhat out of range of the "visible to the naked eye" clause, and its BD catalogue number doesn't give it an early enough provenance for the pre-1850 clause
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)