Deletion of Disenchantment: The Guardian and Israel

Comment: It must be pointed out that The Guardian commissioned the book "to justify itself", so any review (e.g. #9) coming in anyway from the The Guardian is worthless. Five other refs are not possible to verify without a subscription. Ref #1 is more a discussion about The Guardian than the book it commissioned. Ref #2 appears to be about the fact that The Guardian commissioned the book about itself. #5 is about The Guardian which uses the book commissioned by The Guardian as a discussion point. One subscription item does state that it is a review of the book, so assuming that one of the other subscription refs is a review, the book passes . However, I'm not going to assume that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: clearly passes  at this point given the reviews in the Economist, the New Statesman, and the Jerusalem Post
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)