Deletion of Rabble.ca

Comment: The problem here isn't that the publication fails ; it's that because it's been around for 20 years a lot of its GNG-building coverage doesn't Google well (Google is useless for finding media coverage older than a couple of years) and has to be retrieved from news archives. On a ProQuest search, however, I have this up to ten footnotes and counting, which is more than enough to salvage it. This isn't a topic that fails our notability standards, it's just an old article that didn't get improved to keep up with the ''evolution'' in our content standards since the article was first created in 2004, and it's now been significantly repaired
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While I thank Bearcat for improving the article, judging from the additions made much of the coverage is pretty  and wouldn't count for . IMO, websites are organizations and should have to meet the appropriate guideline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:NORG)