Deletion of Bernadette Banner

Comment: as page creator. Easily meets  - has significant coverage in multiple published independent reliable sources. For a couple examples, see https://hyperallergic.com/535278/bernadette-banner-youtube-dress-historian/ this interview (see the notability section at ) and the coverage in https://www.wired.com/story/historical-youtube/ this W article. There is more coverage https://www.themarysue.com/youtuber-breaks-down-five-movies-that-nailed-their-historical-costumes/ in this article that I didn't include because I didn't want to spend time analyzing their policies, but upon further investigation they meet the requirements at . There is more coverage elsewhere (for instance in Teen Vogue) that doesn't meet reliability guidelines but still suggests at notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:INTERVIEW||WP:RELIABLE)

Comment: Per reasons above. Article easily passes , especially with sources indicated by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The subject is an acknowledged expert in her field and has a substantial following.  They therefore pass the spirit of guidelines such as  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:ENT)