Deletion of Bayes++

Comment: Fails . No Sources, all references are self referential. Puff piece, Advertising article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The paper http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.175.2394&rep=rep1&type=pdf Šmidl, V. "Software analysis unifying particle filtering and marginalized particle filtering." In Information Fusion (FUSION), 2010 13th Conference on, pp. 1-7. IEEE, 2010  looks at Bayes++ in some depth, but it is the only one I found that had more than simple mentions of "we used this". That the software is on a Boost short list of http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_33_1/doc/html/who_s_using_boost_/open.html packages based on Boost confers some real world notability. But I haven't found the multiple RS needed for notability. Basic info about the library is verifiable in reliable sources, and per , merging a mention and redirecting to a suitable target would be preferable to deletion. Possible targets are List of statistical packages or List of numerical libraries. But without a standalone article, such a merge  into either article might be out of place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)