Deletion of Sandy Frank

Comment: Jesus Christ, of course the article should be deleted. First of all, the article does not even come close to meeting our standards as described at  and . Is there one single article about the person -- I mean ''about'' the person -- in any reasonable notable publication? There isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: If I got the identity right, he meets : http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/tv-producer-sandy-frank-new-wife-brenda-model-assault-war-roses-article-1.202009, http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/sandy-frank-sues-ring-back-ex-fiancee-article-1.1717385, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tv-producer-claims-tax-credit-167708. Granted, it's mostly gossipy coverage, but it is sources coverage that indicates notability. I concur with Kww that we should not care at all of what the subject wants about the existence of article. The BLP subject is welcome to comment on its accuracy and fairness, but the existence of the article is not something they should have any voice about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Herostratus makes a solid point, but I have to side with NRP - there seem to be enough reliable sources here and I think he meets  based on them, regardless of their usability level. The article is in pretty poor shape now but I think it could be fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)