Deletion of 2002–03 Hereford United F.C. season

Comment: could you explain your logic as to why Hereford's is up for nomination as oppose to Gateshead, AFC Wimbledon and Newport County of the same season - who were all playing levels below? I really don't understand the selective nature of this AfD. And let's avoid using lazy cop outs like 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: all these teams competed at a level where their coverage will see them pass .  Difficult to go into detail in a bundled discussion, but I suppose that's the idea
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: First, one of my pet peeves is the word "clearly"  othing is clear|Nothing is clear, including this discussion.  But given all of the above (and I've read all of it), and despite the fact that I am not intimately familiar with the subject-specific notability guidelines for sports seasons (I've always found the subject-specific guidelines to be somewhat contrived and a convenient way of skirting ), I am not seeing sufficient argument or evidence that this particular season warrants a standalone article.  (And as a quick aside to the warring parties: we go have an essay called Wikipedia:Don't remind others of past misdeeds which comes to my mind.  {{ping|Nfitz}}, {{ping|Number 57}}.  Just sayin', boys
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: all. There is longstanding discussion at AfD that professional clubs that play in nation-wide professional league get season articles per . All these articles pass . In addition in the recent decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 AFC Wimbledon season the bundling of different teams in the same discussion created issues, and there appears to be some consensus that they should be treated separately (1 discussion for Hereford, one more for Dagenham
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: The seventh tier is not a fully professional league, meaning for example no players from the club would pass  (unless they previously playes in a different club at a much higher level). I do not see any evidence that the articles pass . Thus, I do not see why they should be kept. All needed info can be merged into the articles about the club and about the division
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: the fifth tier of English football is nowhere near, the "top professional league" level required by . A review of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Deletion_archive|WP:FOOTY Deletion archive will show clear consensus that for English football the cut off point at which clubs are deemed notable enough for individual seasons is the fourth tier as that is also the lowest tier that consensus holds is |fully professional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:FPL)