Deletion of Heart Kun

Comment: per . This is just a flash-in-the-pan story that will have been totally forgotten about within a few months
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  -- this kind of thing is not uncommon in Japan, but it should tell you something when the Japanese Wikipedia has :ja:ハート君|no corresponding article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as long as it includes some more 's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per  and  (or BLD1E in this case).  This is a fairly standard quirky human interest story.  Note that the LA Times citation in the article actually refers to an entry in a blog hosted by latimes.com; this was never in the paper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Stories from over two years span mean that  does not apply because there is continuing interest. The list of sources above clearly demonstrate passing . For those who mention the dog's cuteness, possibly that's attempting to apply 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:N||WP:HOTTIE)