Deletion of Immigrant criminality

Comment: Rename to Immigration and crime. The notability of the topic is beyond dispute.  The article has been tagged since Oct 2009; there are articles that have remained tagged for years, so why the big rush to swing the ax on this one?  This nomination seems based on nothing more substantial than |distaste.  (Please someone address Hans Adler's point about nigger too, thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Obvious magnet for racist beliefs masquerading as theories. Articles, such as this one, that present statistics as if they mean something are generally |original research and should be avoided and, unless some non-fringe academic sources that discuss intrinsic criminal qualities of immigrants can be found, this article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Immigrant Criminality" is a controversial term. From 37 Google News results for "Immigrant criminality", 18 use it as a part of "myth of immigrant criminality".  According to , ''articles which cover controversial, disputed, or discounted ideas in detail should document (with reliable sources) the current level of their acceptance among the relevant academic community''. The article doesn't do that. I also get the impression that it tries to cast the complex issue of European immigration in a bad light. The seemingly staggering Swiss statistic, for example, fails to mention that the actual number of prisoners is relatively low (less than 5900 in 2006) and that the discrepancy can partially be explained by the fact that the non-naturalized population has a significantly higher ratio of young males. And what about Sweden? Am I simply supposed to believe that ''In Sweden, counting on the amount of money criminal immigrants cost the society has been banned with the explanation that "...you cannot calculate the value of human lives"''? Statements like this are not supported by sources, and considering that two of the five sources link to Wikipedia articles and another two are inaccessible, the entire article is practically unsourced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)