Deletion of List of bus routes in London (2nd nomination)

Comment: A |list of links to related articles is an excellent sort of navigation list.  IF there are articles for the bus routes - which there are - then this navigation list should be kept.  If the bus route articles are someday deleted, then this navigation list will no longer be needed and will be eliminated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: I think RHaworth's argument is a valid one and not a case of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Under that argument, the list justifies its existence on its own, as a navigational aid for other existing articles. If every article about a London bus line gets deleted, then I'd reconsider this reason. But in addition to the navigational argument, I think this is a useful list to have in an encyclopedia. "Useful" in a good way, not in the caricature of the word that is given on  which uses a phonebook as an example. This information is more than a travel guide; it can be of use for students and researchers interested in urban planning and transportation, and I believe that that falls under our mission
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: as an obvious #travel guide|travel guide issue.  Not at all encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)