Deletion of Katara Hospitality

Comment: References fail the criteria for establishing notability as they are either PRIMARY sources (or entirely based on PRIMARY sources such as PR or company announcements) or mentions-in-passing. Fails  and/or . A common misunderstanding frequently encountered at AfD and repeated here is that if an "independent" source that meets  publishes an article, it meets the criteria for notability. This is not the case and an entirely incorrect interpretation. A source may be "independent" and print a company announcement and this fails as a reference for the purposes of establishing notability. The reference/article itself must be "intellectually independent" - simply publishing a company announcement with no independent opinion or analysis fails the criteria for establishing notability. Similarly, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-qatar-loans/qatars-katara-hospitality-raising-500-million-loan-sources-idUSKCN1290IB the Reuters article attributes facts to anonymous "banking sources" and is therefore unreliable. Perhaps the !keep voters above can point to two references that they believe meets the criteria and does not fail  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:RS||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: as article's sourcing (based on many  demonstrates GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)