Deletion of K12 (company)

Comment: I have a concern about this AFD as the article is about a publicly traded company on the NYSE.http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/lrn.html Per  these companies are likely to be notable. There is no evidence the nominator, or anyone, has followed . A second consideration is that "The company is too small, and is trivial in the wide-spread world" are not grounds for deletion. What we care about is if K12 is notable per  or . At present, the article itself does not provide this evidence though that does not mean there has never been any detailed coverage in the nearly three years K12 has been a public company much less in the 12+ years the company has operated. There's a problem with searching for evidence of notability as K12 is a common term and there has been lots of coverage as a result of K12 attempting to secure contracts with school distracts plus coverage of those instances where K12 has a contract. Thus, what I'd like to see is discussion in how to find a needle in the haystack
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED||WP:BEFORE||WP:CORP||WP:N)