Deletion of Zara Kitson

Comment: A notable activist during the Scottish independence referendum, 2014, she was the lead organiser of the "Yestival" and made multiple television appearances, on Scotland 2014. She was on the executive of Women for Independence- a notable group that emerged during the referendum campaign period. She then stood for the female co-convener position in the Scottish Green Party- this led to the first significant contest for such a position within that party. She was recently highlighted by http://www.ywcascotland.org/zara-kitson/ YWCA. These various activities have had coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of Kitson and of the Greens. She is therefore notable when judged against . I detailed some of her activities in the article and had thought it was worded in a neutral way- I have no connection to her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:BASIC)

Comment: Does not meet  and not an elected official ifcthe party,let alone elected to a body.  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/148.252.128.186|148.252.128.186
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: hi {{u|82.32.116.24}}, you ask how you talkpage notification of this afd could be construed as ? easy, it was quickly included on afd lists early on, and has been relisted so no real need to personally notify anyone, and you didn't notify any editor who may be deemed experienced/expert in this type of article, but the clincher is that all three editors said "delete" on the other afd you referred to in the notification, anyway this is a '''keep''' as meeting , article reflects this with numerous |sources and those mentioned by {{u|The Gnome}}, above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASSING||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: on account of subject comfortably passing  and . Several portraits in ''The National (Scotland)|The National'' (http://www.thenational.scot/politics/14889543.Kitson_puts_a_revival_of_Scottish_Greens__links_on_to-do_list/ here, http://www.thenational.scot/politics/14889585.Patrick_Harvie_backs_Zara_Kitson_for_co-convenor_of_the_Greens/ here, etc); invited participant to a BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-scotland-32530428/opinionated-young-voters-quiz-the-scottish-greens panel; extensive reports for her go at party election and campaign in  ''The Herald (Glasgow)|The Herald'' (e.g. http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14095371.The_Battle_for_the_soul_of_the_Green_Party_in_Scotland/ here and http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13168735.Packed__positive_and_proud_____on_the_road_with_Yestival/ here); ''Evening Times'' http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/13306440.Election_2015__Greens_pledge_for_youth/ reported on subject's positions on youth; other interviews (e.g. http://newsnet.scot/archive/zara-kitson-green-2015/ here); and so on. It certainly looks like a keeper. No comment on the politics per se, of course
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: I don't see any evidence of notability which would help justifying standalone page for this politician per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clear  failure. After reviewing all the sources and doing a search of my own, the question in my mind is: does her failed leadership challenge in 2015 get her over the  line? She received a decent amount of coverage in late 2015 because of it, but it's largely from one newspaper that I see (the BBC article is pretty light, so not really counting it.) If there were several other newspapers all covering the Greens leadership election I'd be more convinced to do a weak keep. The remainder of the sourcing on the page passes  but isn't significant coverage of her - a name-drop here, a quote there, a mention here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:V)