Deletion of Lists of television channels (alphabetically)

Comment: as . Tens of thousands of stations, each of which could be considered their own channel. Many choose to air the same content as other stations, but there are a bunch of notable indie stations that would have to be counted. And if a station is affiliated with a major network like NBC but has local programming, are they to be listed twice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: I’m sorry to disagree here, but you say in the nomination that the list is; “…. too broad of a category as per ”. However, in fact, it fits perfectly within the guidelines recommended by this policy.  As stated in the opening remarks of the policy; “…To keep the system of lists useful, we must limit the size and topic of lists.”  This topic is a specific list:  a Lists of television channels (alphabetically) and does limit the topic specifically.  Second, with regards to; “…difficulty to maintain”, is not every article in Wikipedia difficult to maintain on a day-to-day-, hour-by-hour basis with breaking news and vandalism happening second by second? And finally, as you stated; “… it is out of date”  Every article here at Wikipedia is out of date,  that is why we have an unlimited amount of volunteer editors updating and improving articles on a second-by-second basis.  Thanks for listening
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: per . Unwieldy list that needs to be condensed into separate regional lists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)