Deletion of Ninja Sex Party

Comment: While I am intrigued by the concept, the sources simply aren't there to support an article.  I found nothing but trivial fluff at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/27/sex-training-with-ninja-sex-party_n_814987.html Huffington Post and http://www.craveonline.com/lifestyle/reviews/195405-5-hilarious-songs-from-ninja-sex-party CraveOnline,  neither of which is substantial enough to satisfy the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Despite what a few others have suggested in this discussion, this act definitely does not meet the |general guide for notability. The only significant coverage displayed so far in a |reliable source was the puff piece on Huffington Post. The Kotaku article used as a reference is more about Game Grumps than this group, and only mentions this band briefly. As to meeting , the closest this group comes to meeting the criteria is the second criterion, I'm not sure that reaching #9 on a weekly chart is sufficient. Other than that this seems to be a total miss. The individuals involved in this band are involved with a couple of other acts that ''may'' be notable, but notability isn't inherited, and this band at best warrants a mention in one of the other articles (for Game Grumps or Egoraptor perhaps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:BAND)