Deletion of Fulla Nayak

Comment: per Hearts, due to there being  above. Whether she ''was'' the oldest person at the time, or not, is irrelevant, given that she passes . The views spike IS incredibly intriguing: a glitch? Or was she featured on some major "this day" website
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Here's another article from the Times of India: "She claims she is 125 years of age. Her voter's ID says she is 120. Under either case, Fulla Nayak is probably the oldest woman alive." http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2006-11-13/india/27816937_1_guinness-book-oldest-person-oldest-woman The Guiness listing line should be deleted, though, if no reference is supplied. Special:Contributions/24.151.116.25|24.151.116.25
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Significant coverage in reliable sources exists: http://ibnlive.in.com/news/orissas-oldest-woman-fulla-dead/26530-13.htmlhttp://www.dnaindia.com/oddnews/1064047/report-orissa-woman-at-125-among-oldest-in-indiahttp://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2006-11-13/india/27816937_1_guinness-book-oldest-person-oldest-womanhttp://www.puranoticia.cl/front/contenido/2012/02/19/noticia-30166.phphttp://www.ethnos.gr/article.asp?catid=22777&subid=2&pubid=77483, among others. The argument for deletion seems to be based on the probable falseness of one claim in the article, and the nominator's perception that their opinion outweighs |policy. (Can anyone explain the strange spike in pageviews on May 12?) &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)