Deletion of Relationship of Clark Kent and Lois Lane

Comment: There seem to be plenty of sources which discuss the love triangle including a surprising number of philosophy texts which use it as standard set-piece.  Per  and , deletion is a last resort and so we would find space for some of this with the main Superman article rather than deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I thought  issues are reasons to edit, not delete.  At least that is what the policy seems to say
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The article is a |plot-only description of a fictional work with no reception and significance in a real-world context and it appears to rely on |original research by synthesis to generate a good deal of the content. It has only one reference and I cannot find #Reliable_sources_and_other_principles|reliable third-party sources to presume the |notability of the subject. Merely trivial mentions about the character's relationship do not show that the topic meets the |general notability guideline. Using Google, almost all the results are circular references to this very article. The fictional characters and the media around them may be notable but |notability is not inherited. With no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, I believe that this article should be deleted altogether since the usable parts of the article are mostly plot descriptions from media that is already covered in other articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:SYN||WP:V||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:ITSA)