Deletion of Jehovah's Witnesses: Controversial Issues

Comment: per original nom.  Ordinarily, I'd criticize this as a |POV fork, but both this and the JW article are so long and so extensively referenced that merging them would make the resultant article immense.  In this case it simply appears to be a matter of branching an article in a reasonable way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)