Deletion of List of lost ships of Starfleet

Comment: otherwise '''Transwiki''' to Memory Alpha or Beta. Nom states "No improvement" since http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_lost_ships_of_Starfleet&oldid=78189499 this version? That is really not fair - editors have done a lot of deletion and a lot of referencing as well as tabulating. "Pure duplication" - the same could be said about any List or Category; but it is a collation of info from another specific point of view, and an alternative way to navigate the info in the encyclopedia. Multiple ways to navigate is one of the advantages of a Wiki over a paper encyclopedia; don't throw it away. As for notability, the concept of lost ships in Star Trek is certainly sufficiently notable, and the list provides additional context. Having satisfied that, |primary sources are sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PSTS)

Comment: as article has no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FICT)

Comment: An seemingly arbitrary selection of starships belonging to a fictional universe, with no evidence of |notability of topic.  Wholly Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|primarily sourced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)