Deletion of List of famous successes in science and engineering

Comment: Smacks of , and is listcruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per all the obvious reasons above, but mainly verifiability and . It would be possible, theoretically, to assemble a list of engineering projects that have been labelled successes by someone--but that would be of doubtful value. A list of projects considered successes by Arthur Hu--with a decided bias towards his interests--is of even less value. &middot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: fails both  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: I gave this article a brief cleanup at one point, but now this article doesn't seem all that encyclopaedic; it has problems with  and , and so it's probably better just to delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: random, |unsourced, |original research.  See Films considered the worst ever for the way do a list like this in a way that can surrive AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)