Deletion of Workato (2nd nomination)

Comment: While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workato|previously discussed at AfD and the result was delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability. Editor above points to three references in particular but they also fail. https://techcrunch.com/2016/06/23/workato-unveils-personal-workbot-to-silence-some-of-the-slack-bot-noise/ This TechCrunch reference is based on company PR such as https://blog.workato.com/2016/06/introducing-your-personal-workbot-for-slack/#.Xs7QM8B7nuo this blog post and https://finance.yahoo.com/news/workato-releases-personal-workbot-filter-message-overload-151644511.html this company announcement dated the same day, fails . https://www.clickz.com/workato-opens-automation-marketplace-an-appexchange-for-automations-1/255167/ Clickz, https://www.pc.co.il/featured/282821/ This from ClickZ is based on a company announcement and even says it in the second sentence, also fails ORGIND. https://www.pc.co.il/featured/282821/ This from People and Computers is based on a company announcement from one of their partners and says so in the first sentence, fails ORGIND. Finally, https://diginomica.com/workato-automates-app-integration-and-conversational-workflow this from Diginomica is a writeup of the latest platform update but all of the information is provided by the company and peppered with quotations from an executive, also fails  and . The only "Independent Content" is the "My take" section is 4 sentences and says nothing about the company. Topic therefore fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)