Deletion of Nokia 7610

Comment: Actually, many other phones have been deleted and not all the others remain. This is one of the reasons why your  argument is fundamentally flawed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)

Comment: completely non-notable mobile phone. If any of your sources do indicate notability over and above the average run-of-the-mill product, please add them as at the moment this article is also completely  lacking in |Reliable Sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a cell phone catalog. The argument by Kevin that all other cell phone articles have been kept is just plain wrong, since several have been deleted. See also . Colonel, please identify which of the Google News items are your proposal as substantial coverage in independent and reliable sources. This seems to be the best approach for proponents of the article to demonstrate its notability, and many of the news items seem to be reprints of the manufacturer's press release introducing its release, or websites of unknown reliability. Just throwing out a Google search is less convincing. Please specify the ones you feel best prove notability. Then it would be great if you would add them to the article as inline cites. Then I would consider changing my "vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)