Deletion of ASSort

Comment: Completely non-notable.  Lacks even one independent secondary source  to support notability as required by .  No one should be surprised that Google searches turn up nothing, given that it's not even a good algorithm.  If the the array is almost sorted, it makes absolutely no sense to do all that copying over to a linked list and then back.  If you knew the array was almost sorted, wouldn't you simply insertion sort?  This is just  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:MADEUP||WP:SOAP)

Comment: Per http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AOlYeller21&action=historysubmit&diff=445382543&oldid=445372397 this comment by the author, this is clearly |original research.  The author is encouraged to submit the algorithm to standard academic journals for appropriate peer review.  If it gets published, then a Wikipedia article can be written about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)