Deletion of Softcom

Comment: Thank you. I've taken a closer look at the sources, along with https://www.archdaily.com/935317/softcom-head-office-micdee-designs another one I just found, and I agree that they do not establish a sufficient amount of significant coverage. The standard of review is specified in . Most news coverage is routine coverage of a product or initiative. However, I should emphasize that I'm disregarding the  allegation, since it's not relevant to determining notability for AfD purposes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:UPE)

Comment: While there is some in-depth coverage about the company, the press articles are mostly churnalism, with little or no |analysis, evaluation or interpretation about the company and its activities, therefore failing the independent / secondary requirements of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:NCORP)