Deletion of The Ayurvedic Institute

Comment: per , as the significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject is totally clear
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: The sourcing does not rise to the standard set by . In addition, due to the nature of the organization,  and  are relevant — to be blunt about it, we have to have a very good reason to write about garbage fake medicine. Basically, we'd need much better documentation than is actually available in order to justify this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:FRINGE||WP:MEDRS)

Comment: Passes  as no-brainer. There is significant independent coverage in many academic sources. Some of them I found in just 10 minutes are
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)