Deletion of Hodor

Comment: I know that disruptive deletionism is all the rage but what makes this article justify yet another nomination when the topic so clearly passes .  It takes all of 10 seconds to find a substantial source which is specifically about the topic – ''The Ethics of Hodor: Disability in Game of Thrones'' – and there seem to be plenty more which explore this aspect – ''Cripples, bastards and broken things: Disability in Game of Thrones''; ''Fantastic Medievalistic Bodies:(Re) presenting Disability in Game of Thrones''.  So,  clearly has not been followed nor are our policies addressed: ; ; ; .  On a personal note, I was recently tempted to buy a door wedge labelled "Hodor" so next time, I'm definitely going for it.  And now let's leave you with an amusing parody of our |bureaucratic discussions here: ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aXRZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT405 A Novel Approach
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD||WP:BITE||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE||WP:BURO)

Comment: I agree with the keep votes above that the character ultimate meets  and , so shouldn't be deleted even if the article itself could use some work as it stands right now. |There is no deadline for such improvements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: Generally I am not good enough to comment about fictional characters as I do not have technical sound knowledge about them. I do not have issues with the article but it seems to narrowly miss out on 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters#Hodor. PLOT-only articles do not make for a legitimate spinoff per #Summary style approach. Either add real-world material to the article (best at its point of creation), or get rid of the stand-alone article. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)