Deletion of Pheo-Con

Comment: mdash; no |reliable sources which demonstrate |notability for this subject.  Appears completely |unverifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE||WP:V)

Comment: None of the links that you have provided gives any indication that Pheo-Con can pass any of the |notability criteria, much else can become remotely |verifiable through |reliable third-party sources. As for the "consultation with several admins", where is it? because a full site search isn't turn up any
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: For pity's sake, no one's being "brash."  This is not a "convention."  It's a bunch of folks - an ''alleged'' bunch of folks - getting together for a self-referential party, and they admit the first one of the two of these solely involved a group trip getting munchies at a Wal-Mart.  There are no sources, almost no G-hits, no evidence this actually took place, no suggestion of notability, no nothing, and I am at a near-complete loss to imagine upon what policy basis anyone can defend the article.  Spectacularly fails , , , but man, does this hit  pretty solidly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT||WP:ORG||WP:V||WP:BULLSHIT)