Deletion of Allen Greenfield (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails .  Who nominated the article or the motivation for doing so are not really relevant here; what's important is whether the article complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.  The first paragraph or so seems to be a cut & paste from the only (non-|reliable source, but since the author of the website seems to be the same person as the author of the article, it's probably not copyvio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:R)

Comment: In the few months since the AfD, absolutely no cleanup has taken place and the significant edits are still made by the subject himself. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allen_Greenfield&diff=80567668&oldid=80377749 The whole content is unverified as it is written by the subject himself, in complete disregard of |our guidelines regarding conflicts of interest. His importance as an author is not supported by any reliable third-party source. We can't just continue to have articles survive AfD with the promise that they'll be cleaned up if that cleanup is never done. If this ''is'' kept, then the admin should clear the whole unreferenced content and bring this back down to a stub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)