Deletion of Unusual eBay listings

Comment: The fact that the vast majority, if not all, of these items are covered in reliable secondary sources makes this a valid list spinout of eBay.  GNG is met.  Prose and ordering could be cleaned up a bit, but for such a wide-open list (like, you know, the actual variety of eBay auctions...) this is actually pretty coherent and well sourced.   does not cover auction listings, and no policy-based rationale for deletion has yet been advanced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: unless evidence of notability for the concept underlying this list can be provided. I'm no kneejerk deleter of weird lists; in fact, I've been an outspoken defender of several weird lists here. In order to defend such a list, it is necessary to show |reliable sourced coverage for the concept underlying the list -- ideally mainstream reliably source coverage. The article does not show evidence that the concept has obtained such coverage, and my Google searches find only non-RS interest in this topic. Additionally, there's no indication yet of a defensible set of inclusion criteria (tickling somebody's funnybone doesn't qualify
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per . A list of "stuff that is unusual on eBay" clearly falls under '''Non-encyclopedic cross-categorization'''.  and it's , but also  and AL and thus not encyclopedic. If it is to be kept someone should try to wikify it using Colapeninsula's comment to generate a psuedo-notable list ala List of songs considered the best or List of films considered the worst. (But please don't. I like going to http://www.cracked.com/article_14981_the-8-most-needlessly-detailed-wikipedia-entries.html cracked.com for dumb lists and http://www.auctionhumor.com/ Auction Humor gives a more complete list of weird stuff on ebay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:INTERESTING||WP:ROUTINE||WP:SENSATION)