Deletion of Eng Leong Medallic Industries (2nd nomination)

Comment: I trimmed some large un sourced sections. The Internet archive link mentioned above (https://web.archive.org/web/20150828051437/http://elm.com.sg/news-updates/ this one) does have some good local coverage. However, after 11 years this page is largely a company-listing-slash-product-advertisement. You could argue NCORP is weakly met, and you could also argue that the coverage is run of the mill local. I'll say delete as given the state of the article after 11 years,and the low likelihood of improvement, it violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION)

Comment: As per the recent RfC at  (not closed yet but it is clear what the consensus is) it is not enough to say that the references meet  and ignore the ''strict significant coverage requirements spelled out in the SNG for organisations and companies''. So that means we look for references that aren't part of a company's PR echo-chamber - no article based entirely on announcements, financial reports, interviews, etc. We require Independend Content as per . None of the references I can locate meet the requirements for establishing notability and none of the Keep !votes are provided any reasoning relative to CORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)