Deletion of Crossinvest (Asia)

Comment: non-notable per , stubbiness has nothing to do with it, you can have a very good stub or a very bad long article. It is the content that is important
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: No evidence provided, nor could I find, evidence that this organization meets  or .  What's out there is a bunch of references to this company regarding a single employee, none of which provides signficant coverage (that I could find) of the corporation.  Editors who are unhappy with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines regarding notability and article retention are encouraged to take up those discussionsa the Village Pump and/or the talk page of the relevant policy, we are unlikely to gain consensus for a wholesale rewrite of Wikipedia policy in this localized discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence of notability per  Sources generally fail RS or are trivial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)