Deletion of Daniela E Schreier

Comment: per meeting . Further sourcing is available per http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/fea/healthyliving2/stories/DN-divorcediet_1007gd.ART.State.Edition1.2ee1ae.html ''Dallas News'', http://www.usaweekend.com/08_issues/081019/081019relationtips-bullying-genetics.html ''USA Weekend'', http://cbs2chicago.com/video/?id=52392@wbbm.dayport.com ''CBS News'', http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/28183697#28183697 ''MSNBC'', http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/Blagojevich.mental.health.2.884667.html ''CBS News''.  That her opinion is sought and she is interviewed and spoken of in reliable sources meets inclusion criteria. If that's not enough to meet ,  Dr. Schreier is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: I just spent a bunch of time researching her and trying to clean up the article. This one's deletable, as (so far as I can tell), almost nothing has been written about ''her''. All that stuff above is just her as a media talking head who's willing to give juicy quotes diagnosing people she's never met (possibly against the http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html APA code of ethics, but that's another issue entirely). There's simply no information from |reliable sources with which to write an article. And btw, it's not one book, it's two—but they're both self-published, which imo counts as zero. And that's not to mention that this article was written by its subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom.  Being mentioned in articles hardly meets  |notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)