Deletion of Death of Osama bin Laden conspiracy theories

Comment: Weak keep, I guess. Although there is little doubt this article will be needed before too long, I suspect we may have jumped the gun a little in creating in so quickly (per ecentism|recentism and, to a lesser extent, |not news). Now that it's there, I think we may as well keep it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:notnews)

Comment: just to add a small note, I think the notability of this topic is underestimated as part of a |regional bias. All conspiracy theories covered on WP are covered because the theories in themselves are notable through influence and coverage (such as 9/11 theories), not because they're true (or likely to be). The topic of this article is mostly notable in non-English speaking regions of the world (notably Russia and some Middle Eastern countries where it's a semi-government view apparently), which I can understand is reason for people to say 'delete' through not having heard of it, but that's precisely the bias. Special:Contributions/158.143.132.22|158.143.132.22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: Keeping the article right now may violate  and  but I'd venture that this topic will be notable enough to warrant its own article.  '''However''', if kept, the article will need major re-working.  Most of the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_of_Osama_bin_Laden_conspiracy_theories&oldid=427432576 current version reads like a big ol' -- more care needs to be taken to comply with  and .  Specifically,  are needed to describe what the Conspiracy theories are, and then more  to describe the mainstream view on that point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NTEMP||WP:POVFORK||WP:NOR||WP:FRINGE||WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: Are lots of the individual theories not worth mentioning for lack of sources? Maybe. Is this a notable subtopic with a ''ton'' of reliable source coverage? No doubt about it. |Abide by the sources, says I
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: content fork that came about due to . We have no idea if any of these theories will stick. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)