Deletion of Victor Carrion

Comment: the sourcing isn't the best, but full professor at a major teaching hospital should be able to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes . The current state of the article is irrelevant as |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Per Nom, user:KartikeyaS, and |AFD is not cleanup. '''Wait!, what?'''. The essay of "arguments to avoid" also contains |Surmountable problems: {{tq|However, some articles do reach the so-called TNT tipping point: an article should exist, but the article (and all the versions in history) is too deeply flawed to work from. When that point is reached, deletion provides a reset, and give editors a clean slate.}} Family member obituaries do not provide sourcing for anything but to |show sourcing. Certainly the scant remaining sources do not advance any |notability (otability (people)). Being a professor ("...should be able to pass ") does not give automatic notability. A presumption still needs |verifying. Giving as mush leeway as possible the 8 specific criteria of ACADEMIC must be among the rationale and there still has to be |proof to satisfy the guideline, especially the Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#General notes|"General notes" and Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Specific criteria notes|Specific criteria notes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP||WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:REFBOMB||WP:N||WP:PROF||WP:V||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:PROVEIT||WP:notability)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)