Deletion of Zoe Adelle Clark-Coates

Comment: I think her notability is close to marginal, but it is over the threshold to me, with coverage in multiple sources independent of the subject.  A  might help
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: or second choice '''Merge with The Mariposa Trust'''. As a recipient of Points of Light and British Citizen Awards, she would seem to clear . There are https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Zoe+Adelle+Clark-Coates%22&tbm=nws&gws_rd=cr&ei=fIq5V9_sOcK7abWIvdgD#q=%22Zoe+Clark-Coates%22&tbm=nws lots and lots and lots of news sources, but they seem to pretty much overlap the charity, so it might be better to have one good article rather than two "meh" ones
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: She is mentioned in passing in a few sources, but there is not much coverage about her, except written by her (ex. https://issuu.com/marketingswmg/docs/west_april_26_2015 is called an ïnterview", but it seems to be 99% an essay by her). There is a bit of coverage of her winning awards, like http://www.suttoncoldfieldobserver.co.uk/mother-zoe-clark-coate-baby-loss-charity-saying/story-20057576-detail/story.html, http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/health/zoe-clark-coates-top-mum-shortlist-6267416, but both the coverage and the awards seem niche. In other words, the awards don't seem to establish notability, and their coverage is news as normal. It is also low quality coverage, each of those articles seems at least half based on quotes by her. This is really low quality journalism, and overall I don't think she passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)