Deletion of Theodore N. Kaufman

Comment: per historical significance, historical repercussions, and major recent improvements since nomination. "|If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate".  encourages such articles... not their deletion.  We are here to increase a reader's understanding of a topic, not limit it. And note... Wikipedia's coverage of |events of 1941 is not to be limited to only those thing notable to America or known only IN America.  Notable to Germany, even "Reich" Germany through ramifications, if properly sourced (as this one is) is notable enough for en.Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:EVENTS)

Comment: Writing a book that was reviewed or discussed in ''Time magazine'' and ''The Nation'' and which had a demonstrable impact on Nazi-era German propaganda (to the extent of being singled out for commentary by Goebbels) does not strike me as the sort of "single event" contemplated by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: per  with a redirect to Germany Must Perish!. He's obviously  notable for only one event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: per  with a redirect to Germany Must Perish!. This is a quintessential example of a resoundingly obscure individual notable for involvement in a single event, well described in the book article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)