Deletion of The Southern Avenger

Comment: The person in question has a listening audience, viewership and readership from further reaching localities than just Charleston, SC. This meets the requirements as stated in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: minor local coverage does not notability make.  Far below the threshold of ; warrants a short paragraph at WTMA at best.  &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Yes there is |canvassing going on.  A comment on the Southern Avenger's blog http://southernavenger.ccpblogs.com/2008/08/04/alexander-solzhenitsyn-1918-2008/ has urged people to come here and vote against the deletion.  Not that I'm
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: based on its current state as I look at it. The first two references, to the ''Post & Courier'' and ''Harvard Crimson'', seem to establish notability to our standards at . Don't think it needs renamed either, unless it can be demonstrated that "The Southern Avenger" is not the name by which he's best known
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Delete, lacks the "significant coverage" or "multiple independent sources"  demands.  Google News search brings up articles 2 primary sources and nothing else
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: This continues to qualify for CSD A7; the only thing which even seems to imply notability are the links, which fail to do so (as established at  in which interviews and articles in student papers et cetera are not generally criteria).  Also, having property destroyed because you made someone angry does not make you notable.  This discussion is a good idea so we can salt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)