Deletion of Hayden Anderson

Comment: passes . The guideline is being disputed by Fram, so take that for what it's worth. Article was redirected, then expanded. At worst, restore the redirect
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: as subject of article meets , having played two first-class matches in New Zealand. I note that  is currently under discussion, but until such time as that discussion is concluded, to delete would be putting the cart before the horse. When / if  changes, then this deletion discussion could be revisited if the article no longer meets the revised 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:NCRIC||WP:NCRIC||WP:NCRIC)

Comment: no indication of meeting , which is what is required. No SNG can act as an exemption from it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This ''FAILS'' NCRIC because  on the same page says "Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as Sports Reference's college football and basketball databases." It also says "In addition, the subjects of standalone articles should meet the General Notability Guideline." Author needs to stop creating zero-notability perma-substub "articles", whether they've played just the bare one match or not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)