Deletion of Continental Airlines Flight 128

Comment: Per . There is nothing historic nor significant about this. ~~  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: great story but #NEWS|no relevance. Plane suffered turbulence, got diverted. Nothing special here. If it were a case of "airline safety saves the day" (compare Grayrigg derailment, for instance), things might be different, but there's no assertion of anything other than "it was covered in the media".  If this incident meets other criteria, those criteria serously need to be reviewed.  Special:Contributions/81.110.104.91|81.110.104.91
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: story does not appear to have any legs, and WP is . If flight rules are changed because of this, it might be notable, but not as it stands
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: apparently, WP's level for keeping crap articles about anything aviation that gets any press has made #NEWS into a bullshit argument, because frankly, we've become the news when it comes to these; yes, it passes the  but so what, a good ole hold-up at a big city liquor store probably does as well. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwest Airlines Flight 2294 (no injuries at all and snowball keep) for how low we've gone, might as well aim for the Hudson River ourselves and hope we all survive
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Contrary to the previous remarks, it's definitely notable.Wikipedia's definition of |notability is very simple: |non-trivial coverage in reliable sources.  In this case, there's non-trivial coverage from the BBC and from CNN, and I'm afraid those are definitely reliable sources.Much though I respect Wikiproject Aviation, their thoughts about air crashes do not overrule the General Notability Guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per . There is nothing historic, significant about this crash. Sure an investigation is underway, but that happens for most accidents in general, as does injuries and whatnot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: How does  support deletion of this article?  If you read the actual text of NOTNEWS, it's talking about "routine coverage of announcements, sports and tabloid journalism".  Said policy seems to me to be totally irrelevant to the matter
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)