Deletion of Pierre Foldès

Comment: The article meets |the attribution policy and the sources seem to establish |notability.  I'm not sure about notoriety, but in any case, that's not relevant to inclusion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:BIO)

Comment: Passes .  The inventor himself may be only slightly notable, but I can't see how the relevant surgical information could be merged seamlessly with Female genital cutting, and the subject is encyclopedic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)