Deletion of Andrew Stone (footballer)

Comment: He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: This nomination is unnecessary, and an absolute waste of everyone's time.   says ''expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place''.  It's almost certain (barring tragedy) that Andrew Stone will be playing for Indy Eleven early in the season, as is clear to anyone who has been paying attention to their (now completed) pre-season. He started in their line-up in their final pre-season game http://www.indyeleven.com/news/detail/uuid/1e86ze9ul6r5f19rpc0sp103kl/recap---ind--3--1--iu#.U0HWgvkhjYA after he was prodded, even scoring a goal, and be featured in the post-game write-up.  No, this doesn't make him notable, but an application of  rather than losing perspective and being too wrapped up in the rules would show that it does the project no harm, to leave the article alone for a few weeks, to see if the almost certain actually occurs. If something tragic happens, it's easy enough to delete the article at that time. However if the article is deleted, what invariably happens is that someone comes along within hours of the match, before there is a change to restore the article, and spends time rewriting it from scratch, rather than using their time better elsewhere
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:COMMONSENSE)