Deletion of Rashmi Singh (author)

Comment: Since there is no minimum number as per-requisite for inclusion and the reliability is contingent upon the strength of the sources cited, I think this article ought to not be ''deleted'' for ''this'' particular reason. Plus, the sources which are there are otherwise considered reliable. And I think, per , this article is not ''unsalvageable''. BTW, it's my impersonal view (I know the deletion doesn't reflect badly on me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: insufficiently independent sources to establish notability. The  calls for reliable independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The original attempts to get this through  were made by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)

Comment: Nowhere near satisfying 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: No substantial coverage in serious reliable independent sources fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . No substantial coverage in serious reliable independent sources. I've looked at the sources, and have to agree that they are low quality tabloids and insufficient for establishing notability. The "reporting" seems to be a rehash of press releases or other promotional material, and the interviews really don't add much because of the low quality of the publications they are in. My own searches turned up nothing promising, either. Perhaps in the future, this person might deserve a stand-alone article, but, based on the available sources, that hasn't happened yet.  applies here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:TOOSOON)