Deletion of MatheMagic

Comment: Don't you just hate having the prod removed without explaination? This article has no primary or secondary sources, an the article itself suggests it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: as it has no sources to back up , I relisted the debate because it's too early to see any consensus, the nominator as no reason for deleting the article, and the keep argruements for keeping the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: on policy grounds as failing . The two keep !votes above are misdirecting themselves since the "132 Google News Archive" are about all sorts of different organisations and shows. We still need references to back up the content as well as multiple, reliable secondary sources to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The nominators prod argument was "Fails ".http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MatheMagic&diff=168879990&oldid=146511961 Presumably that is still the argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)