Deletion of The Last of the Duanes (1924 film)

Comment: at least for historical purposes. Meets the basic  demands
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I don't think it proves notability. Most movies got a paragraph brief mention in local newspapers up until about the internet to gin up movie theater attendance. So there's nothing particularity notable about it, because it widely applies. I remember reading reviews of movies in my local newspaper in the 90s when I was a teenager. It would be ridiculous to say that local newspapers where the only sources covering movies in the 1920s just because that's the only thing you can find, or to say it's notable simply because of the time period. Just like it would be for me to say the same thing about the movies I read reviews about in 90s. The 20s were practically the height of Hollywood and there was plenty of none local sources covering movies during that period. Just not this one apparently. So, I really don't get what either of you are saying. You can't throw out  guidelines about sourcing just because of the time period or claim that since you only found local sources on this particular movie that they are the only kind of sources that covered movies back then
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: as per the multiple reviews in reliable sources and other coverage that show a pass of  and the article has been substantially improved since nomination as per ,imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)