Deletion of Journey to Promethea (2010 TV Film)

Comment: At 15 unsourced words, the original stubhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Journey_to_Promethea_(2010_TV_Film)&diff=prev&oldid=501247481 seemed destined to be brought to AFD.  While I was able to expand it and make it a much better looking 671 word articlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Journey_to_Promethea_%282010_TV_Film%29&diff=501470533&oldid=501247481 (hope its author watched and understood the step-by-step process),http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Journey_to_Promethea_(2010_TV_Film)&action=history this was done through use of websites which have not yet having gone through the processes for determining their suitability for such genre topics.  If |non-English sources treat it better than did English ones, we may yet turn this sows ear into a silk purse. '''Note:''' If kept, the article will need to be moved to ''Journey to Promethea'', as we do not need a diambig for this title
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NONENG)

Comment: I'm of two minds here. The article is 1-2 days old and we shouldn't bite newbies. Secondly, its not a hoax since it has an IMDB reference. So, it passes  But it doesn't seem to be a succesful or  film judging from its IMDB rating. So, the person deciding this discussion will have to decide whether notability is more important than verifiability here. I'm glad I won't have this task
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)