Deletion of Rachel Roxxx (2nd nomination)

Comment: it doesn't matte the # of years, the real issue is MAINSTREAM media coverage in recognzied and respcted  and  sources. the problem here is that, unlike other porn actresses w ho have articles, her entire noabiltiy exists within a very small niche that has little mainstream coverage. I could create an award for unnotable garage bands and nominate every single garage band 100x and it still wouldnt be okay
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: This nomination has the stink of  all over it. Tarc, I would call this a own-goal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Per  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: per meeting  and  through multiple nominations of AVN Award|notable awards significant to that genre.  It would seem |reasonable that AVN (magazine)|AVN Magazine would be just as acceptable for |verfying the results of their various awards just as are the Screen Actors Guild in verifying their own SAG Awards, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists in verifying their own American Federation of Television and Radio Artists|AFTRA Awards, and the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in verifying their own Academy Awards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:V)

Comment: If  and  support it, then it should be included; if they ''shouldn't'' support it, then they should be modified accordingly so they don't, and ''then'' the articles no longer supported can be AfD'd. In the meantime, trying to circumvent them because they ''shouldn't'' qualify an article for inclusion, IMHO, isn't quite kosher
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: according to , the merest fact that the subjet of this  is also an editor on Wikeipida is even more of a reason why this article should be subject to the fullest cruinty of policy. We cant just take on credit that everything anyone says about themselves is true and the risk of  if she edits her own article extensively or particpates in the debate above and beyond a regular user is great
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO||WP:BLP||WP:COI)