Deletion of Anders Behring Breivik

Comment: A suspect is not a conviction per . Probably, he is the PERPETRATOR, but we should abide by the rule. The article material should be moved to 2011 Norway Attacks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: as per ; also  – “breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information”, and that includes the note at the bottom of . ABB is a suspect and a target of speculation, not a convicted perpetrator. If you want to work on up-to-the-minute coverage, contribute to n:Main page|Wikinews
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERP)

Comment: WP:BLP1E and  specifically exempt high profile events such as this. The perp guideline simply says to consider not creating articles on unconvicted criminals, it does not disallow it completely. Suspected criminals who receive significant international media attention for their role in historic events are an exception, in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: Clearly an example of , which is a BLP '''policy'''. Just a suspect who allegedly did what? The exact acts covered in the main article. Duplicative. Also, this sort of monsterous piece of human filth would be proud to have a Wikipedia page. Special:Contributions/50.73.213.81|50.73.213.81
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: unless something truly notable (apart from 2011 attack) pops up, and this AfD is not going down with speedy close. I will just restate http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anders_Behring_Breivik&diff=440918615&oldid=440918599 my very original conviction that this is one truly classical case of , ditto
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)