Deletion of Destruction of books in post-independence Croatia

Comment: Maleschreiber gave a good summary regarding the reasons. The article is largely based on a single, non-English source, and per : {{tq|"Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources."}} The article has a very exceptional claim, that the discarding of old, obsolete books (that were written in a scrypt or a standardized variety of a language that are no longer official, or with a strong ideological bias) in a time frame of over 20 years is a "bookocide", "libricide", or a "mass destruction". Yet, it doesn't have high-quality sources to back the claim. Outdated books are often replaced by libraries. I somehow doubt that school libraries in Slovenia have their shelves filled with books in Serbo-Croatian/Cyrillic from the 1970s, or the likes of "Edvard Kardelj's collected works
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:EXTRAORDINARY)

Comment: as a  that violates . As a second choice, a short merge would be fine. Any section about this should have very clear in-line attribution to sources, especially Dora Komnenović, so readers can discern the POV sources from the more neutral ones
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:NPOV)

Comment: article is a worthless , no content worth saving
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Those events took place regardless of  and personal attempts at relativization ("they all did it", "it was regularly done"), which are appalling. The key sources are reliable and calling this article and events fringe is simply ignorant in my book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: or '''Merge''' reliably sourced content to Independence of Croatia or similar article, as this appears to be a subtopic. With no personal experience in this area, I'm basing my opinion on the arguments above and a perusal of some of the sources. It would be much easier to assess if sources could be found for the alleged contemporary criticism when the action was occurring. That said, while many sources stem from the publication of a single book, they all felt this topic warranted coverage and they do no appear to express that this event didn't happen. Even editors voting for deletion acknowledge that this was an occurrence, so I'm unsure how this is  or how we serve the encyclopedia by removing information that (presumably) reliable sources covered. There may be a current lack of details as to what caused the action or what the actual result was (were the books destroyed or just relocated?), so a title change may be warranted and the content should be copyedited for tone and validity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)