Deletion of Richard Bevan (2nd nomination)

Comment: this nomination is patently absurd and shows a deep misunderstanding both of 19th century, business, politics, and also of Wikipedia.  Yes, he inherited his money and lived as a member of the establishment.  You might not like the fact that such people existed, but you shouldn't try to "punish" him by withdrawing a Wikipedia article on him just because you don't like him.  That is the lamest most pathetic excuse for deletion that I have ever come across (and it is at the heart of another pathetic misunderstanding known as "").  A Wikipedia article is neutral - it isn't an award for public service to the community. We have articles on good people, bad people and people who were just trying to live their lives honestly in a confusing society
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)