Deletion of Emily Benn (3rd nomination)

Comment: I agree that for a normal politician, she would not normally meet |the politics-specific inclusion criteria. However, she is not a normal politician, as part of one of the UKs most notable political families. With being part of this comes reliable sources that satisfy ; it is my view that the GNG must take precedence over . The core principle of GNG is: if there is significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. These sources: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-life-in-the-day-emily-benn-kj8z3z8hg2p, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7011922.stm, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/pandora/benns-granddaughter-to-stand-at-the-next-election-403411.html, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28389521, all from major UK news outlets clearly show her notability as required by the GNG. The issue raised on inherent notability is not an issue here. From the specific :  Inherent notability is the idea that something qualifies for an article merely because it exists, even if zero independent reliable sources have ever taken notice of the subject. As shown above, sources do exists so we can't claim that the article fails  as verifiable evidence has shown to the contrary. The high quality sources exist, and so does the notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:ITSA||WP:ITSA)

Comment: Seven years later, she has since been elected to office. Whether or not you disagree with the decisions made in the '09 and'10 discussions, she has since been elected as a local councilor. In this position, she was a major local political figure who received significant press coverage, allowing her to fulfill the notability standard as seen in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Forgive me, but  says being a local councillor is insufficient. She clearly fails those criteria: she has to get in on  as far as I can see
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:N)

Comment: From  criteria, ''Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage'' are notable, where ''a politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists''. The sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Coverage that comes as part of standing for an election, which seems to me to be the latter three of the articles you give, should not count towards . That's the point of /, I suggest: we can cover candidates on the relevant election or constituency articles. (It's kind of a variation of .) Otherwise all sorts of unsuccessful candidates would get in on GNG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:1E)