Deletion of Peopletizing

Comment: as  or .  This is what Urban Dictionary is for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP)

Comment: as . No reliable sources; also appears to be , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:COI||WP:MADEUP)

Comment: as a local neologism failing the |guideline for neologisms. The article is also a |conflict of interest as the page's main author's username is very similar to the author of the book that contains the term. http://www.google.com/search?q=Peopletizing&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a A quick Google search provides only results from the local area where the term is used, as well as stores selling the book that started the neologism. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Peopletizing&cf=all A search on Google News brings up only press releases for lectures based around the book. No other reliable sources can be found, and the article is unreferenced. Also a possible self-promotion by the page's writer to promote their book. In conclusion, this article should be deleted as a local, non notable neologism. If the author reads this comment, I would strongly suggest the Urban Dictionary, not Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:COI)