Deletion of The Last Western (2nd nomination)

Comment: per .  Although articles should not be "summary-only descriptions of works", the remedy to such a violation of  is that "such articles should be expanded to have broader coverage."  I have no comment on notability as nobody seems to be challenging this subject on notability grounds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: per lack of . Tons of sources listed in the article and in the previous AfD of few weeks ago (https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=%22The+Last+Western%22+%22klise%22&btnG= 392 entries at Google Books,  multiple articles on ''Los Angeles Times'': http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/665146612.html?dids=665146612:665146612&FMT=CITE&FMTS=CITE:AI&type=historic&date=Jul+27%2C+1980&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=A+quality+book+discovered&pqatl=google,http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/658083382.html?dids=658083382:658083382&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI&type=historic&date=Jun+29%2C+1980&author=&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=west+view&pqatl=google). Clearly passes  #1 and . |AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG||WP:NOTCLEANUP)