Deletion of Connor Franta

Comment: Don't understand why many Youtubers aren't considered notable enough. A simple Google search brings up 9,340,000 results, which is pretty large. I reckon it passes otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: but reluctantly. I personally think that most articles about "famous" bloggers and YouTube stars and such should go, but this person has quite a bit of coverage. For example, take a look at the https://www.google.com/search?q=Connor+Franta&tbm=nws results that a Google search turned up (if you notice, there's several well-respected news sites there). So, I think this narrowly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: May be notable in the future, but the sources provided are all about him coming out as gay, which seems like a case of . &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per the sources linked by {{u|JTDale}} et al. there's a great deal of coverage of his coming out video and although that makes up a majority of the sources about him, there are sufficient others to make it so  is not an issue. --&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: If it were just the recent publicity regarding coming out this article might be , but there are earlier articles from reliable sources such as Business Insider and Adweek. See, e.g. http://www.businessinsider.com/connor-frantas-thirst-project-donations-2014-9 How One Guy Used YouTube To Get Thousands Of Teens To Donate $75,000 To Charity and http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/connor-franta-forges-ahead-solo-career-160123 Connor Franta Forges Ahead in Solo Career. Special:Contributions/24.151.10.165|24.151.10.165
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)