Deletion of Alexander Skinner (surgeon)

Comment: passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: being mentioned lots of places doesn't equate with GNG.  In-depth coverage does, of which there is none. It can be shown he existed, but fails , despite the addition of several more sources which are mere mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The only source that has been found that actually gives significant coverage on the individual, ''George Washington's Kentucky Land'' appears to have been self-published - at the very least, I can find absolutely no other mention of its publisher, "Lake Orion Book ≥Distributors≥≥" in any other context aside from this single book.  In addition, there is nothing I can find that shows that the author could be considered an expert in the field.  Thus, that source can not be considered a Reliable Source at all.  Every other source that has been brought up since this AFD started is, as Eddie already mentioned, just very passing mention that does little more than establish that he existed.  When the only actual source that provides any semblance of a claim to notability is, itself, a non-reliable source, the individual simply cannot be considered to have passed the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there is enough evidence here to show he meets asic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: This is a peculiar nomination; even stranger than the proposition that deletion would be uncontroversial.  Owning lots of land seems to be a straw man as this is not the main basis of the subject's notability.  And appearing in lots of sources is not a lack of notability; quite the contrary.  The book ''George Washington's Kentucky Land'' seems to be quite respectable and well-researched and, insofar as it covers the subject in detail, is fine for our purpose.  And the subject appears in plenty of other works including ''The Centenary of Louisville''; ''Kentucky Pioneer Doctors''; ''Medicine in Kentucky''; ''The Encyclopedia of Louisville''; ''The American Struggle for the British West India Carrying-trade''; ''The Field of Honor''; ''Medicine in Virginia in the Eighteenth Century''; and, of course, numerous records of the Continental Army and the Revolutionary War.  It is especially engaging to read that the subject was indicted by a grand jury for "profane swearing".  As such details have yet to be added to the article, the policy  applies, "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)