Deletion of Mouctar Diakhaby

Comment: meets  as has made his debut
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: article does needs improvement, but so far does meet the  standards. Should not be deleted. I do not understand the IP editor's argument of |wikilawyering, seems more like a grief about a past dispute more than everything else. That doesn't mean that I'm not open to re-discuses the Wikipedia notability policy, but this isn't the place to do it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:wikilawyering)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Easily satisfies  per above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Passes |NFOOTY, has played in a |fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. IP's sour grapes are misguided, there is no wikilawyering in citing an established notability guideline. The player is just starting his career and has passed the threshold, there are numerous instances of players going no further being determined non-notable, but given this player has already achieved multiple junior national team appearances it seems unlikely he would fall into this bucket. The IP would also do well to remember GNG trumps subject specific guidelines, so there is no need for any georgian players to go without an article if he can find sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL)