Deletion of Joachim Cronman (4th nomination)

Comment: The article is impeccably sourced to many reliable sources, thus meeting .  is certainly met given the coverage of this subject in reliable sources, and being a high-level officer who commanded a military installation of some importance is certainly a credible claim to notability. Although this was a bad-faith nomination, I don't think the AfD meets any of the criteria at . That said, this discussion is somewhat premature; the third AfD was closed as "no consensus" under two months ago, and the second AfD was closed the same way one month before that. During that time, there have not been major changes to the article, so I think it's unreasonable to expect a consensus to emerge this time around
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:SK)