Deletion of Beauty Museum

Comment: subject to possible merge of all 3 into 1 article. Sufficient evidence exists to validate this as a significant and notable Malacca tourist attraction; see for example https://books.google.com/books?id=4lAmCAAAQBAJ&pg=PT399&dq=%22Muzium+Rakyat%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDcQ6AEwBGoVChMI0r7jteDgxgIVlg-SCh0yKQj8#v=onepage&q=%22Muzium%20Rakyat%22&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=9lwnUH5dLbYC&pg=PA108-IA6&dq=%22Muzium+Rakyat%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CFQQ6AEwCWoVChMIyfj0-9_gxgIVRYuSCh3DjAKB#v=onepage&q=%22Muzium%20Rakyat%22&f=false and I also have some concern about the |systemic geographic bias inherent in deleting a subject like this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: Malacca is a historic place with lots of museums.  These are notable, being documented in detail in sources such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=krl1BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA84 Melaka History and Heritage in Museums''.  There may be some scope for merger, especially for those which are housed in the same building complex but, per our policies  and , this would not be done by deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)