Deletion of Pradip Kumar Singh

Comment: for lack of evidence of passing , , or any other notability criterion. The mere fact of publishing does not give notability by itself (not does being a professor); notability is caused by other people taking note of those publications in some verifiable way (such as scholarly citations, published book reviews, or the like). In the absence of anything like that for this case, there is no justification for keeping the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Not each and every professor ''(as the individual claims to be)'' can get their article on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Notability (academics) (''there are thousands of Professor in India alone''), unless they had an outstanding work achievement or research work or awards. The individual did not even hold any major incumbent in Indian University system. Moreover minor publications and research paper (''in this case study of previous author/researcher had be revised by Pradip Kumar Singh and editors as co-contributor'') does not make any sense for having separate article on wikipedia. Individual has a |COI and it is a true example of self-promotional activity on the stage of Wikipedia. This article is supported by primary source (''official website of individual''). Couldn't find any reliable source that supports this article independently even on a small scale / search-engines hits. Majorly, this article is a pile of revised book work and research paper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)