Deletion of David Esrati (2nd nomination)

Comment: No , thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Fails ; the only part of this article to have real notability is the reference to ''Dayton v. Esrati'' which would argue if anything a page for it and not the article being considered for deletion. Looking into it though, the case seems to be more a footnote than a major case when referenced in sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Being a perennially-losing perennial candidate for political office is not an  pass, but this article is referenced nowhere near well enough to make him special — it's referenced almost entirely to |primary sources and glancing namechecks of Esrati's existence in media coverage of other things or people, not to coverage that's ''about him'' in any non-trivial way. To be fair, the original creator in 2008 is the likely autobio candidate — but their work got deleted at AFD within two weeks, and the article was then recreated in 2010 by an editor who was far less likely to be Esrati (they stuck around for another couple of years and edited on other topics unconnected to Dayton municipal politics.) So the 2008 AFD wouldn't be grounds for speedying this by any means, but this definitely isn't a significant notability or sourcing improvement over the original version either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)