Deletion of Jamal Simmons

Comment: Draftification''' (in absence of ''proven'' |reliable, independent source coverage that is both ''in-depth'' and ''at-length'' in at least two other sources beyond the BET article identified by Rosguill) Whether this subject qualifies as meeting our supplementary notability guidelines (SNGs), that's ''not'' a substitute for passing . My review of the non-duplicate Google web search and Google news search shows no |independent, reliable source coverage is both ''in-depth'' and ''at length''. Most the press mentions are passing mentions, in reference to Mr. Simmons' television appearances, being quoted in the mass media, or articles he has written. Nothing on which we could write more than a |perpetual, stub-class article. As such, regardless of any potential SNG pass, fails . This reminds me of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erica C. Barnett|Erica C. Barnett AfD about a |non-notable digital news reporter and Internet blogger that closed as '''delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:PERMASTUB||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)