Deletion of New Orleans Records (2nd nomination)

Comment: The first AfD, while not perfect in reasoning, was generally compelling, and I find myself in agreement with the above editor. I disagree that the discography should be wiped, though - so long as it is |verifiable, it's certainly encyclopedic content as the principal activity of the label, and can't see how it would be UNDUE to include it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I had a hard time deciding "keep or delete" on this one. Ultimately, I think we should delete the discography section per  and leave the article as a two-sentence stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Since this is an organization/company, the appropriate guidelines are . I've been involved in AfD discussions previously involving allowing notability of record labels based on the significance of their signings/releases but nothing happened and nothing changed. Therefore, since notability is |not inherited and none of the references are |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, therefore references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NOTINHERIT||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)