Deletion of Naomi Ginsberg

Comment: Although it may well be just a tad , this is a well-sourced article on what appears to be a rising research scientist.  We have so many paltry articles about unquestionably notable academics (some of which I started), that it seems a shame to delete a pretty good article about an academic who appears to be on the cusp of notability —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails , as an Associate Professor with a h-index of only 9. -- Special:Contributions/120.17.113.201|120.17.113.201
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Barely-above-threshold citation counts and Sloan fellow push this to a keep for me, despite being earlier in her career than I would prefer for the creation of a new article. There's every reason to expect her record to continue improving, so in a few years I would expect her to more clearly pass ; if not, we can revisit the decision
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)