Deletion of Kedarnath Agarwal

Comment: per Bwithh's Factiva results and http://www.sahitya-akademi.org/sahitya-akademi/index.htm Sahitya Akademi (the definitive source on who won its awards). Given the difficulties of Googling, the consilience of such evidence as I can find leads to suppose that the subject is notable. Reducing the content to a bald statement of dates, the mention of the Sahitya Akademi award and a bibliography would address all  issues (which are separate from the keep/delete argument in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: by nominator. The problem here is |verifiability. Please review |sections regarding the reliability of resources. As a neutral third party I haven't any way of verifying any of the information on the page. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VER||WP:RS)