Deletion of Jennifer R. Niebyl

Comment: Passes  as argued above. (I am not convinced that the organizations of which she is past president http://www.agosonline.org/public/PDF/2017Past_Presidents.pdf or Fellow https://www.nlm.nih.gov/locallegends/Biographies/Niebyl_Jennifer.html are "major" enough/sufficiently exclusive about who they make Fellows to count, but they are at least in the "eh, doesn't hurt" category.) The underlying theme of that guideline is that scholars and academics can be noteworthy through their work even without gobs of media coverage, which seems to be the case here. The article could stand a good de-CV-ization, but I don't think it warrants deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: She meets  #3 "The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society)" as an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine, formerly the Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, as stated in the article. She would also meet other criteria of , but she only needs one. I have found and added a biography published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, as part of their Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NACADEMIC)