Deletion of Rob Goldstone

Comment: and/or '''redirect''' to Trump campaign–Russian meeting per . Readers on that topic are no doubt likely to be curious who he is but our article provides no independent notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: with no prejudice for relisting. Between  /  and our usual overcoverage that's useful  considering news, which can be corrected later. Although wrong on paper per  / , gut is right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:RECENTISM||WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: As  says, "However, if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified." A quick google news search of him reveal profile after profile on him. Moreover, he may pass  without the current coverage. For example, he has interviews and articles with both the New York Times and NPR
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:N)

Comment: This is clearly a case of ; there's no claim he's notable apart from his involvement in Trump campaign–Russian meeting. I note  regarding some of the speculation above that this meeting is akin to Watergate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: As nomination, classic example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)