Deletion of Michael Levin

Comment: Sufficient third-party commentary on his work and ideas to confer notability under  and . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Could you expand on why you believe he's not notable? He's received significant coverage in many reliable newspapers and news magazines (a google news search of "Michael Levin" and "CUNY" alone gives 117 ghits from The New York Times, Newsworld, USA Today, The Washington Post and many others). |general notability guidelines are certainly met as is . One may not agree with Levin's work, but he certainly is notable in his field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: Academics holding fringe views need to be evaluated under  standards, but those seem to be met in this case. As noted above, a googlenews searchhttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Michael+Levin%22+CUNY&as_user_ldate=1989&as_user_hdate=2010&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&start=0 for ''"Michael Levin" CUNY'' gives 117 hits, many of which providing specific and detailed coverage of the subject, e.g.http://www.nytimes.com/1991/09/05/nyregion/cuny-barred-from-punishing-white-professor.html?pagewanted=1http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/newsday/access/77368455.html?dids=77368455:77368455&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+30%2C+1990&author=By+Mark+Lowery&pub=Newsday+(Combined+editions)&desc=CUNY+Prof+Defends+Racial+Beliefs&pqatl=googlehttp://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/WT/lib00179,0EB0EED6AB7A21B3.html. While the coverage is mostly concentrated over the 1990-92 period, when there were particularly vocal protests related to Levin, the time spread seems to be sufficient to ensure that this is not a BLP1E case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)