Deletion of Amanullah (Khairpur cricketer)

Comment: into a List of Khairpur cricketers per my reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ziauddin_(cricketer). In short, this isn't a biography but inflated match scorecards and the information shouldn't be dressed up as a biography. This team played few enough games for a list to be feasible in terms of length, and I do not think the cricket sub-SNG, which conflicts with , is a good fit for obscure players for whom no biographical information is ever going to turn up
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)

Comment: Doesn't meet the basic requirements of  or ; it has been shown time and time again that the criteria laid down by  are overly inclusive and a poor indicator of notability for players who have appeared in very few matches – nothing has changed with the guideline since the RfC linked above, which reinforces that view and makes it clear that arguments based  guidelines alone should carry little weight at AfD. Per SPORTBASIC, scorecards are nothing more than  proof he played; claiming notability requires much more than that. As the only sources are indiscriminate statistical repositories (Cricinfo, CricketArchive, etc.), this falls well below the threshold required by GNG as there is zero significant coverage. Unfortunately, as a result of the limited sourcing, this is also nothing more than a mirror of those websites converted into a couple of sentences. If there were an appropriate "list of.." article, he would probably belong there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPORTBASIC||WP:NCRIC||WP:NSPORT||WP:ROUTINE)