Deletion of Jo Ramos

Comment: from the sources I can find in the news search the subject has received |significant coverage from multiple non-primary |reliable sources, as can be seen http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=F6IVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fAsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=jo-ramos&pg=6628%2C664720 here, and http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=YLgmAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XgsEAAAAIBAJ&dq=jo-ramos&pg=6706%2C2657409 here, as two examples of the many articles where the subject of this AfD was the primary subject of the article. Therefore, the subject passes  & Criteria #1 of . I understand the concern about |the individual being primarily notable due to her relationship with her father, Fidel V. Ramos, and that the majority of easily find-able web content is regarding |her death, however if one does a little digging, you'll find that the subject of this AfD received significant coverage not directly related to her father, or her death
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:MUSBIO||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)