Deletion of AbelsonTaylor

Comment: I agree with {{u|DGG}} that the article is promotional, I started to neutralize it, but most of the content is referenced by either their corporate page or sources with questionable independence or reliability. Bloomberg's profile is a valid source, but not enough. My problem with the only claim of notability is that it's sourced by an article written by Illinois Business Daily, they have written a couple more articles on the firm including a non-notable award https://ilbusinessdaily.com/stories/511550669-abelsontaylor-nominated-for-multiple-trailblazer-awards. The tone of the article that supports the claim that the firm is the "world's largest independent full-service advertising agency that focuses exclusively on health & wellness" suggests that it might be a press release There are very few reliable sources that mention the subject but there is no in depth coverage. I could also find an article about an award written in the Chicago Tribune but again the award is not notable and no in depth coverage. In my opinion it fails  and  so there is no point in trying to rewrite the article to remove the promotional material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom and . I don't see any sources passing  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: From , per , "Wikipedia bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources ''unrelated'' to the organization or product." The article currently has 19 sources ranging from Bloomberg, PharmaVOICE, Illinois Business Daily, and MM&M - Medical Marketing and Media. These outlets are unrelated to AbelsonTaylor. Secondly, the opening paragraph states clearly why it's notable: "largest independent health and wellness advertising agency in the world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:ORGIN)

Comment: Utter spam crap with gems like ''AbelsonTaylor's colleagues have voted them the Most Creative Agency 11 times and the Most Admired 6 times'', fails . References are the usual promotional churnalistic pieces, totally fails  and/or . Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. Fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)