Deletion of Marlboro, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Comment: This article was nominated for deletion because "the place does exist, but is identical with Marlboro Township, New Jersey."  Now the nominator is stating "the question is not if it exists but if the article will add anything".  The nominator seems confused about his purpose.  Any hamlet in New Jersey with a post office, railroad station, school, hotel, and multiple stores and churches--adds plenty to Wikipedia.  This nominator seems confused, or the nomination was vexatious.  I propose a |speedy keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:KEEP)

Comment: per historic outcomes for AfD discussions of US places () and per .  It is a commonly accepted standard that any reliable source reference to the existence of a place (in the US, anyway) past or present, is sufficient to show notability under the principal set forth in the very first sentence of : "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and '''gazetteers'''". (my emphasis added) And to answer {{u|Alansohn}}'s query above, Marlboro township has a GNIS ID of 882118 and the populated place Marlboro has a GNIS ID of 878130.  The township's GNIS entry includes several distinct coordinates, one of which is for the populated place of Marlboro.  Your argument that we shouldn't include Marlboro because it is included in Marlboro Township is simply faulty.  By that logic, we shouldn't include either because they are already included in the article on New Jersey. And I am in agreement with {{u|Magnolia677}} that either the nominator is confused or this nomination is in bad faith.  Witness the vexatious argument above where the nominator cites the search page for the term "Marlboro" in Monmouth County, rather than the exact cite to the populated place Marlboro, which is prominently displayed in the article nominated for deletion here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPLACE||WP:NGEO||WP:5PILLARS)