Deletion of Kiini

Comment: well-documented dispute, covered in depth by sources as reliable as one is likely ever to find regarding a story like this, and of significant professional/scholarly interest to intellectual property lawyers (the ''NYT'' article is likely more "reliable" by Wikistandards than law journal articles, frankly).  There are certainly editorial improvements to be made to the article and retitling may be appropriate.  Certainly as Wikipedia develops its garment-industry coverage (''hint hint'', anyone?!) this is the type of subject matter the encyclopedia should pat itself on the figurative back for addressing. It's Chrismukkah week and I don't have time to do it within the running time of this AfD but deletion would not be supported.  Query whether this nomination is focused on actual ''deletion criteria'' or just  (for some undisclosed reason
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Almost all the sources are about the litigation concerning the trade mark for this bikini type. The subject itself does not appear to have much of a |notable profile of its own. Perhaps, we should await the legal resolution
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)