Deletion of Thomas Eric Duncan (2nd nomination)

Comment: While clearly , the key phrase is 'if an event is of sufficient importance, even relatively minor participants may require their own articles'. This was a very significant event, and this individual's part in it, albeit mostly inadvertent, was a key part of the event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Ebola virus cases in the United States. Duncan is simply not notable and the article runs afoul of  - he's not notable, the event he was connected with was, and the other article has enough information about him to render his own article redundant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This was just posted by ''The Washington Post'', one minute ago.http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/review-cites-problems-at-texas-hospital-during-ebola-crisis/2015/09/03/4628878a-529b-11e5-b225-90edbd49f362_story.html Besides the previous AfD failure,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thomas_Eric_Duncan, the article, Ebola virus cases in the United States is  at 118kb and much of the Duncan content should be offloaded here. The "Ebola virus" article is obviously going to continue to grow. As for the  argument, the Duncan article passes item #3, the John Hinckley, Jr example
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOBIG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Ebola virus cases in the United States is already .  In addition, TED's relevance isn't simply passive ("just got sick").  His movements and actions that lead to the first U.S. ebola outbreak, his interactions with Presbyterian, and the controversy surrounding how his apartment was handled, are all components of the story
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOBIG)

Comment: for the policy reasons behind . There is no need for a redirect as the world will little note nor long remember Thomas Eric Duncan. As to the comments by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This is an index case of the best-publicized infectious disease outbreak in many years.  There is |far too much information to be merged elsewhere.  This is an extremely well-sourced article.  Citing ONEEVENT would eliminate all articles of famous sick people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOBIG)

Comment: satisfies the |general notability guideline. There is enough reliably-sourced content about him to warrant his own article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)