Deletion of Frank Senn

Comment: rather impressive Google Scholar results for the subject area suggests he passes  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as per the reviews shown in this discussion that show that his works have received academic reviews which isn't surprising as he has 3700+ library holdings,passes  in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I found multiple reviews for multiple books, including http://thecresset.org/2006/Aune_M2006.htmlhttps://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA165691294&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00096407&p=AONE&sw=whttps://jbtsonline.org/review-of-introduction-to-christian-liturgy-by-frank-c-senn/https://www.jstor.org/stable/42613115?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contentshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020964313517858?journalCode=intc.  That makes a case for .  The article isn't in great shape, but I don't think it's quite so bad as for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:TNT)