Deletion of Joe Manchik

Comment: The coverage here just makes him a , not a topic of enduring public interest who readers will still be looking for |ten years from now. GNG does not mean that we keep an article about every single person whose name happens to pop up in the news cycle for a day or two — we judge notability on the basis of ''enduring'' impact, and don't just keep everybody who can show two or more media hits
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:10YT)

Comment: per ; there is no inherent notability for being a political candidate and coverage limited to his candidacy - while robust - is routine for purposes of WP (albeit odd
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: per , , and . Being a trending topic for a news cycle is different than being an encyclopedic topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: he's run in enough elections I can't support a redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio, 2018.  He's clearly not notable enough for a stand-alone article; the coverage consists of Ballotpedia (and similar directories of candidate), local http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180716/ohio-special-us-house-election-green-party-congressional-candidate-tries-to-make-noise---on-low-budget or trivial mentions, and http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/08/green-party-spoiler-candidate-in-ohio-special-election-claims-to-be-descended-from-aliens.html news of the weird coverage.   is not met, and there's no coverage that's not about a campaign
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)