Deletion of Role-playing shooter

Comment: Shooter RPGs are definitely a real sub-genre, but the sourcing in this article is beyond awful.  Gamefaqs as a source?  If |reliable sources can be found, it should be kept.  If not, then delete it.  I wouldn't be surprised to find significant coverage out there, but this one's not worth my time to search
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Falls down the |original research well as suggested by the nominator, the supplied sources are of dubious |reliability in a lot of cases and address individual games rather than encompass the concept. A brief web search turned up discussion of Borderlands but not a lot else. Genres are a bone of contention and wikipedia doesn't need articles on half-baked concepts passed off as the real thing. (Short version, see below for further waffle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)