Deletion of Bart Tanski (3rd nomination)

Comment: Fails to meet  and not notable for anything else.Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGRIDIRON)

Comment: no new arguments for deletion have been introduced, except "the news articles are old" -- but notability is not temporary.  I maintain that the subject has achieved notability for the reasons I outlined the last time we had this discussion.  Barring any reason given to change position, I still say it's a keeper, espeically with the buzz created from his college playing which is more than enough to pass  even if  is not met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: per Dirtlawyer1 and Cbl62 in the last AFD. I really didn't understand the no consensus close while there was well-reasoned rationales in the delete side that was stronger than the keep side (Ret.Prof doesn't count, he always votes per X keep on every AFD with a keep comment without looking at the article). High school football player with only a brief amount of fame and hardly college football. Now a private individual, this falls under  as there is no sourcing outside his high school career, and . Lets not keep biographies with the faintest amount of coverage as it will only cause problems in the end
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Exceedingly minor schoolboy American football player, whose achieved a minor US state award for best high school football player. Afraid not.  It seems we are trying to dramatically widen or perhaps dilute the  guidelines to such an extent that anybody with a tiny modicum of recognition, can now get an article. Articles like these dilute the spirit and letter of WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)