Deletion of Harry Broudy

Comment: per meeting , , and  as explained above. Great example of . This is a terrible nomination. The subject is not recently deceased as claimed above (died in 1998). I'm curious, did the nominator do a ? His bio is included in multiple encyclopedias https://www.britannica.com/biography/Harry-S-Broudyhttps://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/historians-miscellaneous-biographies/harry-s-broudy. Google scholar https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C21&q=Harry+Broudy&btnG= reveals his works are highly cited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:HEYMANN||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Hundreds of citations on several books and articles in what I believe to be a low citation field looks like a pass of  C1.  That's supported by a volume of the ''Journal of Aesthetic Education'' that was dedicated to him.  His books are widely held by libraries according to WorldCat, and I expect that he'll also pass .  I've added two reviews so far
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR)