Deletion of Catholic Supply shooting

Comment: Per , which is a ''policy''. RAPID is misguided, it should be the other way around (cf. ): Do NOT create an article |too soon, because there is |no deadline. If an event that originally appears to be minor (and shootings with only a few people killed are regrettably quite routine) later turns out to get sustained widespread coverage and/or can be shown to have an impact beyond the initial event, ''then'' the moment has come to create an article. Application of RAPID just results in keeping something on the thought that it can always be deleted if it turns out never to become notable (which is the world on its head), but in practice this just means that it gets forgotten and lingers in limbo without anyone editing or even reading it. Anyway, this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a newspaper and the tendency of some editors to jump upon everything currently in the news to create articles about what may be ephemeral events is quite regrettable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:DELEY||WP:TOOSOON||WP:NODEADLINE)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . At present we have wide non-local coverage - e.g. http://time.com/5459737/catholic-store-missouri-shooting/ TIME (via AP wire), https://www.aciprensa.com/noticias/desconocido-dispara-contra-mujer-en-tienda-catolica-de-estados-unidos-62197 aciprensa (Spanish), https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-america-shootings-chicago-hospital-20181120-story.html Chicago Tribune. As we can not evaluate future coverage or lasting effects, and present coverage is SIGCOV (with the exception of SUSTAINED which we can't evaluate due to the event being recent) we should err towards keeping the article, per RAPID, until we can evaluate this at a future date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS|Wikipedia is not a newspaper—a fundamental policy of an ''encyclopedia''—and this is just current (unfortunate) news; we argue about charges, a trial, and later a possible conviction but those are all routine to a news cycle of a crime. With that understood, coverage cannot be said to be |sustained at this time and the same can be said for an obvious |lack of lasting impact. Notability simply cannot be established when so much is determined on what ''may'' be written about this crime. I suggest deletion, per policy, and to slow our roll on breaking news stories
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:LASTING)

Comment: needs expansion.  Coverage meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: mostly per  and //. 15,000 or so people get killed by guns every year in the US. There is no long term significance to this shooting over the other 14,999
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SENSATIONAL||WP:NCRIME||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: per above like-minded !votes, article needs expansion, easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:MILL violent crime; sensationalist routine reporting does not change this (). Recreate if still written about 5 years from now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)