Deletion of List of Cogs

Comment: a list of generic enemies lacks context of any sort. A textbook case of failing to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: no assertion of notability. Violates , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: This is just a list of enemies. It is #GUIDE|game guide material and fails .  Any material from reviews should be added to the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:VGSCOPE)

Comment: per , , and  all being insufficient reasons for deletion.  Plus, it is a legitimate search term per http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/List%20of%20Cogs these readers and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Cogs&action=history these editors.  --Happy editing!  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:ITSCRUFT||WP:PERNOM)

Comment: Textbook failure of  and  (the level ranges). The cogs do not seem to have received the considerable secondary coverage which would justify a separate article. Even if that was the case, you don't inform readers about a subject by offering them a list of componenents without context. The cogs are covered as much as needs be in the Toontown Online article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:VGSCOPE||WP:GAMEGUIDE)

Comment: no notability. no notability claimed. no out of universe understandability. only use violates . counter to . zero sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:VGSCOPE)