Deletion of James Shortt

Comment: Unsupported claims do not contribute to notability and (the attack nature aside) the claims of the subject are shown to be questionable.  Trimming everything down we have authorship of a few books and teaching martial arts.  He does not meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:MANOTE)

Comment: Article history shows it was categorically created in 2009 as an attack page by an individual associated with a fraud-shaming site, and though sourcing has been added, none if is particularly good quality.  The vast majority of the article's text appears to be disparaging of the subject, both expressed an implied (for example listing a excessively large number of suspect aliases heavy implies the subject is a shifty person).  This is not what Wikipedia is for; we're not a pillory.  There are other sites for that.  Furthermore, this is a |biography of a living person that, for all evidence I can see, is not notable in any way.  He published a few minor books and teaches martial arts, neither of which have been at a level that would constitute |notability.  I had never heard of the subject and I only became aware of this article because I was doing a round-up of military imposters, and discovered many inappropriate articles that were created on Wikipedia by shaming sites, all of which have been deleted. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTEBIO)