Deletion of Educational Demonstration

Comment: That is an interesting template you have used alongside my name.  {{tl|vandal}} has connotations of objectional conduct and is highly inappropriate to a deletion discussion. If you have something to say to assert and verify the notability of the article, then go ahead and say it. If you can improve the article to make it of sufficient quality to avoid deletion then do that. But do not spend your time and energy on people instead of the primary task which is to create a proper encyclopaedia. Please read .  Note that the person closing this discussion will read the article with care, will look at the references, and will take arguments about policy into full consideration, but will ignore personal remarks and rhetoric. Please put useful comments here based upon notability, verifiability and other aspects that will demonstrate to the community that the article should remain here. Please add relevant references to the article to demonstrate not only the notability of the topic but also the notability of the term, and use |reliable sources. Also read the policy about |assuming good faith where your fellow editors are concerned
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:RS||WP:AGF)

Comment: since nominating this article for I have also nominated its sister article Promotional Demonstration for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promotional Demonstration|here.  Quoting from the rationale there: "''Considering the two articles together they could be viewed as a  style vehicle for promotion of the commercial and rather spammy reference to Redwoods Media, a reference which is present in each and which mentions the term in an entirely "buy this product from us" manner
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)