Deletion of Murder of Joe Geeling

Comment: Since this sad case is just one of many thousands of murders worldwide each year, and it does not appear to have had wide-ranging effects other than on those immediately involved. See the essay 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Please take a fresh look at  under "edit Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" where it now says "News reports. Wikipedia properly considers the long-term historical notability of persons and events, keeping in mind the harm our work might cause. The fact that someone or something has been in the news for a brief period of time does not automatically justify an encyclopedia article..." This was added to  on May 28 by Jimbo Wales. Also see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons where it now says "Articles about living people notable only for one event: Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be memorialized forever with an encyclopedia entry
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: it has been said in afd's that notability doesn't "expire" or go away. If that's true, the multiple sources make this meet .  I tend to think that notability doesn't go away, or we'd lose thousands of articles on historical figures that don't show up in the news much, if ever, - and certainly less than every Survivor or Idol contestant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: on principle.  The principle being: #Indiscriminate.  Not everything that made the papers is encyclopaedic; this has no apparent lasting cultural or historical significance, it belongs in WikiNews if anywhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom. I see no lasting notability here, and no need to sensationalise the plight of a victim. And there is specifically a section in  that says, in effect, we are not a newspaper. Do the ethical thing, not do the "source counting" thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)