Deletion of Joan Elliott Pickart

Comment: This is a clear failure of #3, and I find {{u|Megalibrarygirl}}'s selective quotation of the criteria in her argument to be somewhat disingenuous. The relevant wording omitted from her argument is bolded: {{tq|The person has created or played a major role in co-creating '''a significant or well-known''' work or collective body of work.}} If the person's one significant individual work, or their whole body of work, is not ''in and of itself'' significant and well-known, the person in question fails NAUTHOR3. It's clear from the paucity of reviews in this case that the body of work is not, in this case, significant and well-known, and therefore the subject fails NAUTHOR#3. &spades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I agree with {{u|RebeccaGreen}}. There's enough reviews of her work in RS to pass NAUTHOR#3. I was on the fence, but I'm glad RebeccaGreen found more reviews than I did and did a . I added the LJ article quickly, as I have to get going for the moment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: This person clearly contributed to the genre of trashy romance novels. There are one or two pieces of coverage for her books in moderate level sources. It's definitely not clear to me this person meets  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: She meets #3, "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a ... collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of ... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." I have deleted the unencyclopaedic content and added biographical details. I have also added reviews from the ''South Bend Tribune'', ''The Dispatch-Argus|The Dispatch'', the ''Romantic Times'', plus an article from the ''Tucson Citizen''. Although  doesn't specify non-local coverage, those are from Arizona, Indiana and Illinois, as well as the national ''Romantic Times''. I have added some quotes from reviews - more could be added. I don't have access to the ''Library Journal'' review which
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NAUTHOR)