Deletion of Letter of thanks

Comment: WP:TNT is neither policy nor guideline.  The claim that none of this content would be wanted in our final article seems quite false.  For example, the article cites a NYT article ''https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/06/fashion/the-found-art-of-thank-you-notes.html The Found Art of Thank-You Notes''.  Why wouldn't we want to keep this reference and build upon it per our actual policy of ?  The nomination doesn't explain.  Nor does it discuss the numerous books devoted to this topic, such as ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ahXIR6NMEI0C Writing Thank-You Notes: Finding the Perfect Words''.  Here's the perfect word for this:  "|before
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The article has been entirely rewritten ''after'' it was nominated for deletion (), and the topic meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG)

Comment: I did a quick Google search for "history of thank-you letters", and it does look like there is enough to pass  after eliminating all the how-to sites and focusing just on reliable sources about historical significance: https://www.google.com/search?ei=7V6ZW533K8LKjwTc9Kso&q=history+of+thank-you+letters&oq=history+of+thank-you+letters&gs_l=psy-ab.12..33i22i29i30l10.20410.29528..32351...0.0..0.143.1541.0j12......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i7i30j0i13j0i7i10i30j0i8i7i30j0i13i30j0i8i13i30j0i5i30j0i8i30j33i10.mdcWRKfMeJ0. I believe that treating the subject in terms of historical significance does make for an encyclopedic subject. (Thank-you letter strikes me as a better pagename than Letter of thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)