Deletion of Nils Horner

Comment: I would argue that Nils Horner easily passes  as well as Wikipedia:BIO#Creative professionals. He was the Asia correspondent for Sveriges Radio, which in itself makes him one of the most important radio journalists (or indeed journalists) in Sweden. The fact that we have more than four million articles doesn't mean that every notable person is covered. Some will have their articles created when they die. If one is unfamiliar with the subject in question it might be prudent to question the notability in a case like this, but it's hardly a good argument for deletion ''an sich''. He was well-known and respected journalist; it's worth noting that when e.g. the prime minister and the foreign minister comment on the news, they don't vaguely talk about the tragedy of a journalist killed while working, the importance of journalism or something like that, but rather comment on the career and accomplishments of Horner. A few examples to support this: http://www.dn.se/ledare/huvudledare/en-radiorost-att-sakna/ En radioröst att sakna, http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/sveriges-radios-reporter-nils-horner-dod_3350394.svd?sidan=10 Nils Horner öppnade världen för oss, http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/sveriges-radios-reporter-nils-horner-dod_3350394.svd?sidan=6 Nils Horners karriär, http://www.gp.se/nyheter/varlden/1.2307628-roster-om-tragedin-i-kabul Röster om tragedin i Kabul. I agree that any Swedish journalist killed in Kabul would have been major news in Sweden (especially as news are written by other journalists), and coverage alone isn't enough, but there are better arguments than "it's in the news" to keep this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)