Deletion of Ryan Frazier

Comment: upon review of his sources, he fails , and doesn't have any automatic notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Doesn't pass  or , while being the first person of color is certainly an important milestone for the city of Aurora it is not particularly notable outside of local coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Aurora CO is not large enough to hand all of its city councillors an automatic inclusion freebie under , and non-winning candidates for election to Congress are not guaranteed Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — for either role, the notability test is the ability to |reliably source some evidence that he's a ''special case'' compared to most other people who've done the same things. There's no evidence of that being shown here, however — the sourcing is split between |primary sources that don't support notability at all, and purely |routine media coverage no different than every city councillor and every non-winning candidate could always show. This is not enough coverage, either in volume or in depth, to make him a special case among otherwise non-notable classes of topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: clearly doesn't pass  as per Nom. This rules out all of the best Frazier-focused sources. His company and charities don't seem big enough and there isn't enough coverage of him in his owner/trustee roles to satisfy GNG, afaict. If he was actually serving as a councillor atm then it would make sense to redirect him to the city's governance. As he isn't, that and the elections he was involved with are all equally legitimate. Thus redirect seems inappropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)