Deletion of Vidyut Kale

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as subject does not meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: I believe that she does meet . The ''Times of India'', ''India Today'' and ''Femina'' sources all have significant coverage of her and her work, and the ''LiveMint'', ''Telegraph'', and ''New York Times'' sources add more coverage of her, which also combines to demonstrate her notability, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Does not meet basic  although New York Times article is a good reference, I do not think it is enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I came to delete but having read the references (which are mostly  and are on her as subject), found more (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/narendra-modi-rahul-gandhi-sarcasm-sites-spoof-websites-172144-2013-07-30 India Today https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/kapil-sibal-sarcasm-sites-spoof-websites-vidyut-kale-rahul-modi-172679-2013-08-03 India Today https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/Activists-bemoan-absence-of-active-Pirate-Party-in-India/articleshow/34542968.cms Times of India), she does at least technically meet WP:GNG.  She could possibly make the technical case for  with this: https://www.amazon.com/Thoughts-India-aamjanata-com-differences-diversity/dp/3841770231 Amazon, given her blog (and thus her book) are widely covered. And remember, these are just the online English sources on her, I have not been able to search non-English soures on her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: as subject does not meet  or .  Substantive and in-depth coverage is lacking in the sources produced above, including the NYT article and Times of India.  Her primary claim to fame seems to be creation of spoof sites on two Indian politicians
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: since subject fails . |Wikipedia is not a collectioon of random information, nor a forum for |puffery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPERSON||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:PUFFERY)