Deletion of Mizuko Ito

Comment: It is really up to those who want to keep an article to do the research and to add the necessary references to the article, rather than scolding others for not each independently spending a considerable time checking "Google scholar" or Science Citation Index or some other data base to try and find the individual's publications, to see what research awards they have received, what review panels they serve on and whar journals they edit, what research grants they have received, and what influence they have had on their field. Thre are thousands of college teachers of varying title in the world, and most of them are so ordinary as to not deserve either an article or even extensive research to try and find if they have distinguished themselves. It really does not satisfy  to say "I edited a book and I say she is distinguished" after the Essjay fiasco
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Many of the above comments convince me that this person is notable within their field, enough to pass our  guideline for inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: i.e. inline citations, reliable sources) by the end of the AfD. Should be deleted otherwise since unsourced articles about living people shouldn't be allowed to stand regardless of the person's notability. Though even being Joi Ito's sister (probably the main claim to fame) doesn't make you inherently notable, and I don't want to get into a debate about whether she meets , she has independent coverage, e.g. interview in Technology Review http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=15859, so probably meets |the primary biographical notability criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)