Deletion of Rashmi Thackeray

Comment: passes  ,Editor of Saamana and Marmik
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the sources listed above are all independent of the subject and provide significant coverage to her. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . The above source cited by ChunnuBhai is aimed to provide coverage to Uddhav Thackeray than Rashmi
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: Entirely non-notable individual who's notability depends on the mouthpieces published by her own family. Subject fails , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: passes  https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/rashmi-thackeray-behind-uddhav-thackerays-success-a-woman-with-dignity/articleshow/72268497.cms is sufficient coverage on the subject for this purpose
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)