Deletion of Britain's Josef Fritzl

Comment: This is a hard one to decide. It has been much improved, and no-one can complain of lack of references. I don't, myself, feel that once there are four or five |reliable sources, much is gained by going on to find 10, 20, 30... especially when, as will be the case with a notable crime, they are just different newspaper takes on the same event. Balanced against the improved sourcing, I set a lot of store by the  criterion of ''verifiably of significant lasting and historical interest and impact''; I know that is only an essay, but I think it is an important criterion to keep Wikipedia ''encyclopedic''. Any flap about a footballer's girlfriend's new hairdo will get into a lot of newspapers and so can be argued to be ''notable'', but will be forgotten as soon as the next celebrity sensation occurs and is not really encyclopedic material. This is more significant than that, but for all the deep significance people are trying to read into it, it's really only a horrible crime and will be largely forgotten in a few years
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: There is almost no information at all available and what is available, belongs to Wikinews not Wikipedia. There is nothing yet to indicate that this person will be notable beyond such comparisions. It can be recreated if information exists to satisfy .Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)