Deletion of Douglas Weiss

Comment: per  and . First off, a reputable psychologist does not use the term "sex addiction", which is not in the DSM-5; that and other peculiar phrases require a total re-write. Secondly, I don't see how this person passes the professor test: there's nothing that indicates it in the article at all. Finally, writing a book does not guarantee inclusion here -- everybody knows in 2021 that |we are not a web host
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:PROF||WP:NOTWEBHOST)

Comment: I disagree with {{u|Kbabej}} and {{u|Jeepday}} that this "intimacy anorexia" concept justifies a BLP per . Weiss' book on the subject is ten years old, but https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C50&q=%22Intimacy+anorexia%22&btnG= the term doesn't seem have been adopted in the scientific literature. In fact, the article intimacy anorexia should probably be deleted as well, per . I find it particularly weird that the definition of the term cites the official-sounding ''American Association for Sex Addiction Therapy'', which in fact seems to be nothing but a https://aasat.org/ one-man frontend for Weiss's counseling clinic. Back in 2019 Special:Diff/928366628|I tagged the article with a {{tl|COI}}. Both the Douglas Weiss and intimacy anorexia articles were created in large parts by |single-purpose accounts {{u|Cml442}}, {{u|Designje}}, and {{u|Shoop719}}, and two Colorado Springs-based IPs {{IP|73.3.212.178}} and {{IP|98.245.69.34}} (which is where Weiss seems to be located per his website). Except for the "malpractice" section that is, which Special:Diff/991779368|was added in December 2020 by a Los Angeles-based IP {{IP|12.198.166.150}}, and which is why the subject himself seems to be requesting deletion now. Long story short: both articles feel a lot like  and should be deleted. And the whole story could be archived as a cautionary tail for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:1R||WP:SPA||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:FAMOUS)