Deletion of BattleKnight

Comment: Despite strong presence across country lines, until it gets some credible third-party coverage (and there isn't really any that I can see), it doesn't merit an article here on en.Wikipedia. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The appropriate guideline here is . Yes you get a lot GHits because each country gets its own bulletin board. There are NO secondary reliable sources showing non-trivial coverage. You cannot argue your way around that. Gladiatus was deleted for the very same reason. If there are secondary reliable sopurces then where are they? Show the sources and I'll withdraw the nom. Until then |policy and |notability guidelines should be enforced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:N)