Deletion of 274th Forward Surgical Team (Airborne)

Comment: organization meets criteria #3 of . There are multiple mentions in non-|primary, which could be argued to meet  when taken in total. At worse this article could be upmerged into a parent article, but it is my humble opinion, that by meeting criteria #3, the unit is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILUNIT||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: As per , which I quote: '' presumption of notability for a military unit or formation depends wholly on the existence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject''. I believe that this unit has received significantly more coverage that might be routinely awarded to, say, the 626th Brigade Support Battalion, which is a largely unknown component of the 101st Airborne. This is a partial listing of the mentions I found in Google Books
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILUNIT)

Comment: To address WikiDan61's (valid) concerns, I'm not trying to make the case that the book sources I mention above represent |significant coverage, because individually they don't. I said as much in my initial !vote. And yes, they mostly refer to the same event. I also said as much. My argument is that ''in the aggregate'', what coverage does exist serves to establish a level of notability well above the average military support unit, which I believe is enough to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:MILUNIT)

Comment: Yunshui's !vote sums up my opinion nicely. There is just enough out there for |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)