Deletion of Marlene A. Eilers Koenig

Comment: for failing .  As usual, the subject's own appraisal of notability is irrelevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Strictly looking at the merits of the article, it fails . The sources do not cover the subject in depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As discussed, a subject doesn't have a right to demand that she's not included because criticism of Wikipedia|she doesn't like Wikipedia, Wikipedia doesn't need her permission, and there will be a discussion here.   There are a lot of links to the article, which suggest that she's being used as a .  As such, it may be worthwhile to help explain the source, especially if the source is her blog. A widely published and cited author, I'd lean towards '''keep''' actually
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE)

Comment: only actual bio source is a bio blurb of the sort that tends to be supplied by the subject. This is not enough for . (Arguably, this should have been summarily deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)