Deletion of Sri Vishwanath (author)

Comment: Also, please do not put "keep" twice. You've already put "keep" once and while you can continue to debate, you shouldn't keep putting "keep" in the header of your comments. I would, however, like to ask that unless you have further sourcing other than the ones you've posted or arguments that fall within , that we move any further debating to either a user talk page (you can use mine, if you like) or to the talk page of the article itself. I don't want to bog down the AfD with paragraphs and paragraphs of text that just repeat the same thing over and over again
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: No coverage in notable sources. Once he receives such coverage, the article may be suitable for inclusion, but not until then. Sales figures are not coverage, and, in any event, confidential "graph screenshots" are not permitted as |sources on WP, unless and until they are publicly published and commented on by reliable third party sources. I'll also note that if someone has access to such confidential material, it could be argued that they have a |conflict of interest, and it would be important to avoid giving that impression
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:COI)

Comment: Doesn't meet any of the criteria listed under  and while I admit that being ranked #38 in 99¢ Kindle downloads in a subcategory on Amazon is more than I've accomplished in my own life, it still is an accomplishment that has not resulted in the subject of this article enjoying "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" as required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:N)