Deletion of In Decay

Comment: notable as there are multiple reviews from reliable sources: Pitchfork Mediahttp://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/16917-in-decay/, Tiny Mix Tapes http://www.tinymixtapes.com/music-review/com-truise-in-decay, CMJhttp://www.cmj.com/reviews/com-truise-in-decay-ghostly/, and a couple I'm less sure of : iTuneshttps://itunes.apple.com/us/album/in-decay/id536028404 (do we value their in-hosue reviews?), ''Prefix'' http://www.prefixmag.com/media/com-truise/in-decay-album-stream/67206/ (appears legit, but I'm not sure). Per , the nominator should not have evaluated the article purely on its current state but should have searched for sources, though if the search was just made for the phrase "in decay" without the musician's name, it would be easy to miss those because of the false positives for such a common phrase. In the event that consensus disagrees to keep, this should at least be redirected to Com Truise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per the above sources and other reviews http://consequenceofsound.net/2012/07/album-review-com-truise-in-decay/http://exclaim.ca/Reviews/DanceAndElectronic/com_truise-in_decay; this release appears to meet  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NALBUMS)