Deletion of Edward B. Giller

Comment: My comments above aside I'm on the fence about this individual's notability, and will need to look further at the sources available as there does appear to be some coverage, but I'm not sure I can determine whether it constitutes  with out going through it in more depth. Ultimately my main concern here is that the keep arguments seem to be misapplying the substance of an essay (i.e. WP:SOLDIER) which contrary to the arguments above does not create "inherent" or "automatic" notability for anyone (regardless of rank, award or deed), but merely lists topics that are presumed to have significant coverage as req'd by our extant notability guidelines (but obviously would not be notable if that presumption were proven not to apply
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: clearly notable per  - I personally think that the criteria should be adjusted to include only 3-stars and above as being "automatically" notable, but until that changes, this article is a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)