Deletion of Entertainment industry response to George Floyd protests

Comment: Fails  and . Such a list is destined to grow to unreasonable size, and convey little to no meaningful info
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: we do not need a list of random celeberties that have to chime in to controversy. This happens in every event. Can easily be covered in the main article, and is a clear violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Subject fails , , , and . This is a current event and Wikipedia is not here to host this sort of slacktivism. Let's wait twenty years for responsible history to be written upon the statements of celebrities and then this article can be developed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTN||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: any salvageable content (such as coverage to be had on a few select celebrities supporting BLM) to George Floyd protests under a subsection, '''Delete''' the rest, with a reminder to the article creator that |Wikipedia is not a news reporter, |it is not an indiscriminate repository of information, it is an encyclopedia first and foremost. Topic does not pass  at this point in time
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:LISTN)

Comment: Trivial unencyclopedic .  None of the responses by the celebrities are notable, and if by chance one or two were, they can go in the main article.  The page adds precisely zero to the project
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: As per  and . Trivial and redundant lists of random celebrities joining protests and giving money isn't notable on its own and does not warrant an entire article dedicated to it. It can be summed up in one sentence in the main George Floyd protests page that a number of celebrities supported the cause, if it's even notable enough to mention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: this is not encyclopedia worthy.  or as a -M selective merge. No need for a standalone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:ATD)

Comment: I understand the passion behind this list, but to put it politely, Wikipedia is not the place for this kind of list. It's a clear violation of . The list can be useful, but it's better suited for a blog or something else
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)