Deletion of Prospero's Books (store)

Comment: shouldn't we be looking at  for this one, ie. " Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance.", so if the coverage of the bookburning is discounted will there be enough to warrant an article? The "local news item" above does talk of the bookburning (probably why they decided to cover this news item) and talks about an urban library which may be a slight variation on the Little Free Library that individuals, groups and businesses have been setting up all over the world; prospero also happens to have set one up, hardly notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: The book burning actually got a lot of coverage. Local radio coverage from last year http://kcur.org/post/flipping-through-pages-prosperos, Local News coverage (not related to book burning) from this year http://fox4kc.com/2015/07/16/urban-libraries-pop-up-around-the-metro/. It meets at least  for such a small company since.  is the real decision here, it has had national/international coverage ''in addition to'' continued regional coverage, but the most substantional national coverage is for one event.  is pretty convincing to make a keep for locally known places that have had at least one nationally known notable thing. It also pops up on tons of travel/tourist stuff for KC, which isn't an official criteria might make people wonder ''why'' it's listed so they might look it up here. I think that since it's written pretty neutrally it should probably be kept. If it was promotional I'd probably be biased against it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:AUD||WP:LOCAL)