Deletion of Mark Chadbourne

Comment: Lacks coverage in independent |reliable sources to establish notability.  Claims for notability in the article are problematic.  For example, chart claims appear to be based on Soundclick which isn't a recognized chart.  And other claims like "His fixed harpsichord sonata "Area Sets" was lauded as a breakthrough composition by critics around the country." cannot be verfied as I http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=%22Mark+Chadbourne%22+%22Area+Sets%22&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&safe=on&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=nw#q=%22Mark+Chadbourne%22+%22Area+Sets%22&hl=en&safe=active&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=ivnso&ei=QRDATdv2GO6D0QGDy92XBQ&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=282d9d5433c41066 cannot find any actual critical reception for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: If "a considerable amount" of verifiable information is available in reliable sources such as those, why not add them to the article? Furthermore, although self-published sources can be used to verify information, they cannot be used to establish notability. I'm glad they exist to verify, but what is there to show that Mark Chadbourne is notable? You've added three links to the article: one |self-published, one written by a friend of his, and one potentially reliable and independent source. However, the reliable source shows chart listings for the song on what appears to be a relatively small TV station. Having #1 songs on that chart alone does not meet the criteria at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:MUSIC)