Deletion of List of people who have been pied (2nd nomination)

Comment: well sourced and populated with notable people. "Pie in the face" is a notable (if silly) form of expression that receives great attention when it is applied to political leaders in particular. As with all these types of lists, should be policed to make sure no unverified claims are made (especially any that violate ), but as it stands now it's sourced, a notable topic - that makes it viable. It could stand to use a better introduction, but that's a content issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Pie does not deprive one of basic human dignity.  As Skomorokh notes, pieing is a direct action.  I would suggest a compromise regarding those who feel there is a  concern.  The list should be restricted to individuals who have articles independent of their having been pied.  If we include everyone who has been demonstrably pied the list would lose its point, and already includes too many irrelevant piefaces
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per #Basic human dignity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: No argument made as to what part of this article violates  (in fact, I think it supports it very nicely), or what has changed on wikipedia since it was previously nominated. Notability of topics for articles depends on the number of third parity reliable sources discussing it. The article is very well sourced and interesting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per Alientraveller. I don't care if it has 6,000 sources; having a pie thrown at one may generate a |short burst of coverage, but its lasting impact is almost always zero, and if greater, can always be included in that individual's biography
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOBJ)