Deletion of Kingsley Fletcher

Comment: Passes  thanks to Nomoskedasticity's work.  He's received substantial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources from Ghana, Mexico, and North Carolina.  This guy's marginally notable in a bunch of different ways, none of which would be sufficient on its own; however, when you take them all together, I'd say he passes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: added 29/9: easily passes  now; AfD has resulted in clear improvement to the article.  It was reasonable to nominate it as it was -- but in its current version I seriously doubt this article would have been nominated for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Extant sources do mention his name, but they do not have the depth-of-coverage to meet the "substantial" criterion at .  As such, coupled with the conservative reading of , this person should likely not have an article about them at Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP)

Comment: When we can't establish basic facts about his life, it speaks volumes about his notability. Although his article gives several indications of "notability" we can only find sourcing for |one of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)