Deletion of Banded speed cosmology

Comment: There is a lack of third party reliable sources describing this work, (e.g. newspapers, books, science mags. etc.). There is also a lack of material published in journal by people other than the authors concerned, i.e. the theory has not been taken up by the wider scientific community.  applies here. wrt to the science (this is probably the wrong place), if I understand their theory correctly, then these three electrical engineers seem to have missed a key point of relativity in that there is no absolute frame of reference.w
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The three so-called "peer reviewed" sources cited by the article are published in a questionable open access journal known as the ''Journal of physical science and application'' (which is listed as such http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/02/29/david-publishing-flipping-its-model/ here and is even called a scam http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2013/06/on-david-publishing-once-again.html here). Moreover, this journal has only one worldcat holding. Apart from being primary sources (rather than secondary sources as specifically required by the  policy), these sources don't even pass the  smell test
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:RS)

Comment: for lack of the reliable secondary sources needed to pass . The existing sources are neither reliable (per Sławomir Biały) nor secondary, and even if they were published in a more reputable journal I'd want to see multiple independent groups working on the subject before having an article here about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)