Deletion of Korom

Comment: mdash; The core issue is |the policy of verifiability. The main policy-backed argument is that there's no evidence that the village exists.  Other things nearby having the name "Korom" doesn't mean that a village officially exists or otherwise meets . Although not an actual guideline, this concept is covered in |common deletion outcomes for places.  As far as whether it's truly a "hoax," I don't know&mdash;that's literally the problem here. The policy-based presumption is that it shouldn't have an article unless we can prove it exists. It's not a valid reason to "keep" something because there's not evidence that it's fake; it's the other way around:  there has to be direct evidence it's not fake to be kept.  No prejudice against speedy undeletion the moment that's demonstrated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GEOLAND||WP:NPLACE)

Comment: A search for "Mavila family korom" returns only sites that mirror this article, so this is certainly a hoax. Not to mention this is unsourced and poorly written {{ping|Doncram}} Please do not engage in ersonal attacks|Personal attacks against the nominator or any other editor. Per the guideline, comments of your nature are considered a personal attack. {{tq|Using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views—regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream. An example could be "you're a train spotter so what would you know about fashion?"}}. Best regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)