Deletion of List of Israeli Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2013 (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:POVFORK|POVFORK and |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: for the same reasons I gave in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012: , , etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LAUNDRYLIST)

Comment: for same reasoning given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Violations of the Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012. Furthermore, the title which defines the scope of this article my allow it to be an  which gives serious  concerns. If the article is kept, the article should be neutralized by making it an embedded list in Ceasefire of 21 November, 2012 and contain all "violations", regardless of alleged causers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACKPAGE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per .  Cease fire violations are rarely determined objectively. the violation claims will inevitably be sourced to op-eds at best. This is exactly what is happening in this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The intention here and earlier was simply to get rid of uncomfortable stuff, while implicitly keeping a dozen parallel lists that show Israel as a victim of rocket or other attacks. Deletion contextually would violate . The only legitimate complaint and suggestion would be ''Merge''. As long as the deleters persist in calling for such pages to go down the memory hole, I'll argue for keep. Like everything else, it can be improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)