Deletion of Hutman Artcars

Comment: This article provides no |verifiable sources to establish |notability. A very messy abuse of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: per #SOAPBOX and . The poorly written article is a form of self-promotion. Notability is questionable at best. Article does not follow Wikipedia guidelines for how articles should be written, including the appropriate way in which to cite sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:COI)

Comment: I agree with Leebo in that theoretically, an article could be made form this.  However, its clearly a  which is one of my particular peeves.  Based on some of the talk page comments I have read by the author "I am a visionary artist", it is pure vanity and shameless self-promotion.  I can only conclude that pending a complete re-write by a neutral party, the article is not something that I can endorse
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: The article is fundamentally flawed, as it is entirely the work of the primary artist behind the subject of the article.  This ''clearly'' marks it as #Self-promotion|Self Promotion and #Creating_an_article_about_yourself|Autobiography under Wikipedia guidelines.  I agree with Leebo86 that there could ''potentially'' be a good article on this topic, but it would have to be written ''without direct contribution'' by the artist, in the article.  People who are being written about are welcome to come participate in the ''discussion'' side of an article, helping to correct facts or provide useful info, but are not supposed to try to control the article itself.  No matter how notable you are -- even if you're President of the United States -- it is extraordinarily bad form to edit an article about yourself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:AUTO)