Deletion of Millie (short story)

Comment: per everyone above. Her stature as an author makes her works pass #5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: meets , i may be going out on a limb here ("dont worry coola, the branch is strong enough!:)), but i reckon mansfield may be one of the writers where no. 5 applies ie. "5.The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable.", sources mentioned above show that article can be expanded, as for "This article as it stands is a disgrace. ... the sooner the content is deleted the better..." (as well as "run little stubbies, before the big bad editors destroy you!{{=)}}), just a small reminder from  - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:CONTN)

Comment: Meets  certainly. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Millie%22+%E2%80%9C+Katherine+Mansfield%E2%80%9D&btnG= Google Scholar as well as  https://www.google.com/search?q=Millie+%E2%80%9CKatherine+Mansfield%E2%80%9D&client=firefox-b-1-m&tbm=bks&prmd=inv&sxsrf=ACYBGNQD95DtPIWea1vPALQdhZCyrCKh1Q:1571522197072&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8oMCyqKnlAhXuHjQIHfVXD5Q4ChD8BQgXKAY&biw=320&bih=446&dpr=2 Google Books have plenty of leads, looks like efore was not followed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:B)

Comment: Passing mentions of the story in articles about the author are not enough to establish notability for a standalone page. Please, see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BOOKCRIT)