Deletion of Salisbury Mall

Comment: Once encyclopedic, always encyclopedic. The fact that this mall may be demolished soon does not detract from the fact that it was once an important retail area where many people were employed. Understanding the rise and fall of shopping malls in an era of widespread car ownership is an important part of economic history, in the same way that the development of electric streetcars meant that downtown department stores could tap a larger geographic catchment area, at the expense of neighborhood merchants. One role that Wikipedia can play is answering a reader's questions about the sort of company where the reader's grandparents worked. Articles about vanished factories, department stores and even malls play a role in answering those questions. In any event, the references meet , but there are a number of ways in which the article could be expanded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Personal testimonials by single purpose accounts are not very compelling, but this borderline based on some of the sources that ''finally'' have been produced after Uncle G stated exhaustively what was necessary here.  I don't subscribe to  as it is a proposed guideline, but I suppose that if these sources are added to the article it at least meets  and it may be of local importance, though I personally don't see much notability in the "...first enclosed climate controlled mall on the entire Delmarva Peninsula."  It would be nice if there were a source that actually validated that this building has any kind of local historical significance, other than a blog, which isn't exactly a |reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL||WP:V||WP:RS)