Deletion of Flora Footbridge

Comment: Bridges are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because of who they're named after or what they happen to cross over — and GEOFEAT does not say that bridges get an automatic notability freebie just for existing, either, it says they're considered notable ''if they clear  on the sourcing''. But the sources here are a |primary source from the city's own website, the local neighbourhood pennysaver and a 148-word blurb in the local daily — which means two of them are not support for notability at all, while the third is a start toward getting this over GNG but ''not'' substantive enough to carry it over the finish line all by itself as the ''only'' GNG-eligible source in play. This doesn't necessarily have to have grand claims of architectural or historic uniqueness to qualify, though those certainly wouldn't hurt — the absolute minimum baseline that it has to meet is clearing GNG on the sources, but these sources aren't clearing GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Flora+Footbridge%22+-wikipedia Plenty of sources, and footbridges can meet  (eg: Jade's Crossing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:GEOFEAT says " ...(bridges and dams) can be notable under Wikipedia's GNG." and I believe this passes GNG as is. The fact that it is named after a very notable Canadian politician means that it will surely get more coverage at its inauguration (no need for a rystal ball for that I think). I have moved the page to its official name Passerelle Flora Footbridge as per the city of Ottawa source and the Mainstreamer source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Bridges the Rideau Canal in the center of the capitol city of Canada, so  M.P.s and ordinary commuters will ice skate to work under it.  And while it does not appear to be designed by a marquee architect, I think it passes  due to extensive news coverage, much of the coverage, to be sure, is curmudgeonly garrumphing over the choice of the name, like this opinion essay in the Edmonton Sun:  https://edmontonsun.com/news/local-news/egan-why-we-shouldnt-fawn-over-footbridge-named-flora/wcm/5c4ba78d-8832-4b52-a46b-c75ee348d3f4EGAN: Footbridge named Flora? Why we shouldn't fawn over it.   Quite a lot of that sort of thing from crotchety Canadians.  They do get intense about naming footbridges in Ottawa, cf.  Corktown Footbridge#Origins#Naming; not much to do in Ottawa except look at the Canadian Tulip Festival|tulips and Capital Pathway|ride a bike over the Rideau.   Nevertleless, it's a $21 million project and been in the news for years https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/new-footbridge-to-be-built-over-the-rideau-canal-1.3040138 New footbridge to be built over the Rideau Canal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)