Deletion of Planetary mass type

Comment: The first reference, which appears to refer to the origin of the classification system, should refer to a primary of secondary source see . This reference does not refer to anything and is therefore an invalid reference. Also your reference suggests that this is original research which is not premitted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as .  This is not a classification system currently in use.  Scientists seem to have a hard enough time 2006 definition of planet|agreeing on what a planet is in any official context, let alone coming up with a comprehensive classification system like this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as |original research.  However, I would support its recreation or retention given its backing by an authoritative source and/or evidence of its being used by the astronomical community
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)