Deletion of Mr Creosote

Comment: Another lazy nomination which does not make the slightest effort to demonstrate that the article cannot be improved as our |editing policy specifies.  I made a quick search and soon found a http://books.google.com/books?id=wPQelKFNA5MC&pg=PA25&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=0_0&sig=ACfU3U3VlU_2XV-Wj_hFx_eKACiGGA-EAg#PPA25,M1 reliable source which discusses the topic at length.  I may now improve the article accordingly but the chilling effect of threatened deletion is a disruptive obstruction to this.  The nominator failed to discuss the article's problems on its talk page and has made no attempt to improve the article himself.  Such superficial drive-by deletion should be censured since it disrupts our essential process of article development by slow accretion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: While I would not say that being a character in a major film automatically confers notability ( does have more specific requirements), in this case there are indeed plenty of secondary reliable sourses regarding this character and his influence outside of the film. Apart from the source cited by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)