Deletion of London Buses route 371

Comment: I compared this to other London bus routes, all listed, that have articles and that do not have articles.  This seemed comparable to other London bus routes that have articles.  I concede that I wasn't following |general notability guidelines, because if I did, very few of the bus routes would survive AFD.  I concede that I was treating this as a case where there is apparently either a guideline or an unpublished guideline that normally applies to London bus routes.  I also noted that there is a redirect category for London bus routes, which seems to imply that someone thinks that London bus routes are worth keeping track of, and they can't be kept tracked of unless they are in the encyclopedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I know that it is very much the Wikipedia way to select a group of volunteers to whom one does not belong and dump on them for not doing enough or for making mistakes.  It is very popular for non-AFC volunteers to dump on AFC.  We get dumped on for not accepting things that could be fixed in article space.  We get dumped on for accepting things.  So sometimes a reviewer has to be |be bold and decide that an article might survive AFD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)