Deletion of Infosuicide

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: From : "''Finding blogs, books, and articles that ''use'' the term rather than are ''about'' the term are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require ''analysis'' and ''synthesis'' of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by the |original research policy.''" I have yet to see any  talking ''about'' the term to the  level.Maybe, maybe not. See discussion below
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: The problem is that, according to , a term needs secondary reliable sources discussing its use, not showing evidence that it is used. Only two of the sources use the term, and I'm happy to accept that both are reliable - but unfortunately all they do is use it. The Daily Dot is close http://www.dailydot.com/culture/mark-pilgrim-infosuicide-manhunt-reddit/, but a little too limited to base an article on, and Eric Meyers only uses the term in passing. If there are some good sources discussing the term itself that would be great, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)