Deletion of Pets of Imran Khan

Comment: There's no case for deletion as there's the obvious |alternative of merger into the main article about Khan.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: Because no clear reason was actually provided by the contesting IP, and because the subject meets  by a significant margin as explained above or evidenced in the large number of reliable, |multiple sources quoted in the article. Many of them much before Khan's election or for that matter his entry into mainstream politics. Very few other politicians, and certainly in the case of Pakistan, have had as much coverage on their pets, so this is not even mere trivial coverage. Also, this coverage is based on multiple, reliably-sourced, different stories and anecdotes as opposed to one or two events, so that itself negates that lone point. I will go the extent of saying that no other public figure has been discussed as much in the Pakistani public or media for their lifestyle and keeping of pets as much as Khan, after perhaps Jinnah. Musharraf might come a close second, and even his gifting of a dog is mentioned
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Easily meets  even with the meta/circular articles. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: easy keep vote for me. The subject has accrued , both direct and tangential, in reliable sources (including two works of print media https://books.google.com/books?id=AO7ddXdGjxIC&pg=PA108#v=onepage&q&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=JnVs_JmciTYC&pg=PA18), has a claim to significance, and has a precedent on Wikipedia by way of Winston Churchill's pets, Pets of Vladimir Putin, etc. To begin, Imran Khan's pets have garnered coverage directly concerning them in regional/national publications, namely ones such as these https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/04/06/imran-denies-kicking-out-pet-dog-on-new-wifes-order/https://tribune.com.pk/story/987302/imran-divorced-reham-over-text-amid-furious-rows-report/ https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/pakistan/imran-khan-is-not-kicking-out-pet-dogs-from-bani-gala/ that either report on or refute the possibility that Khan's animals played a part in his divorce. Either way, the coverage is ''directly'' concerned with the animals. I find the ARY News source (this one also makes mention https://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/24122/imran-khan-versus-saad-rafique-in-defence-of-sheru/ of the incident) to be pertinent to this AfD, as it states that Khan has been criticized for the going against Pakistani social norms by allowing his dogs in his house; this seems to be a credible claim to significance, and a case for why Khan's animals have a measure of encyclopedic significance. Moving on, Khan's late dog Sheru (per https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/304073-musharraf-gifts-puppy-to-imran, a gift from a former president of Pakistan) also received several direct mentions in the Pakistani press (and one in the Daily Mail https://nation.com.pk/08-Nov-2015/imran-divorced-reham-by-text-after-rows-over-dogs-daily-mail, which I am listing here as a testament to the dog's international exposure, not as a ), including one https://www.geo.tv/latest/189799-sheru-died-years-ago-imran-dismisses-viral-reports that characterized a report of the dog being kicked out of Khan's house as "viral". Two other dogs of Khan's have accrued more coverage, for example this source https://theprint.in/opinion/imran-khans-ex-wife-reveals-the-real-dog-behind-his-latest-matrimonial-discord/52755/ from The Print that covers the multiple events Khan's dogs have been involved in. Other animals owned by Khan likewise are covered, mostly as a result of him having to disclose https://www.dawn.com/news/1360579 his personal wealth. And then of course there are the few articles that reference this page's existence, which is a  issue. That being said, the weight of quality coverage amassed by Khan's animals prior to August 2018 (when this article was created) should be more than enough to meet  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:CITOGENESIS||WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Plenty of coverage in independent sources. Passes .{{u|SamHolt6}} has provided a wonderful explanation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)