Deletion of Belen Echandia (2nd nomination)

Comment: You seem to be contradicting the discussion eliable_sources/Noticeboard#Is_it_OK_to_use_interviews_with_company_owners_as_citations.3F|here. Interview pieces can only be used as evidence that something was said, not that what was said is a fact. Taking that into account everything in this article except about one line is 'X says ...'. The reason I support ChecktheRhyme's request to delete this whole article, which includes plenty of my own work, is that there are none to few neutral, non interview, sources of information that wikipedia would consider notable. Therefore I can't how to write this in any neutral way
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: The interviews aren't being used to support statements like "this is the best brand in the world." They simply establish that it has been covered in a non-trivial fashion in mainstream, notable sources. There's nothing in the otability policy that negates interviews used for that purpose
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I'm pretty strict about companies needing reliable sourcing, and still this seems like an obvious keep to me.  The above comment clearly misunderstands our notability standards.  The magazine pieces are, in fact, exactly what Wikipedia demands in the form of evidence to establish notability.  Vogue is clearly a high profile fashion magazine, as is Harper's Bazaar.  The articles appear to be standard articles for these magazines, and so there is no reason to discount them as being press releases.  As such, that alone establishes notability per  and .  Furthermore, the article itself is not overly promotional (any more so than any other company article).  Sure, some of it could be cleaned up (I don't think the Media section is really necessary or appropriate), but the article sure seems like a keeper to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COMPANY)

Comment: Regarding some of the other arguments here; the perceived quality of a company or product has no bearing on whether or not it meets Wikipedia's otability standards.  I know nothing about this brand, but it doesn't matter if the quality is high or low; the question is whether or not the brand has non-trivial coverage in multiple eliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:R)