Deletion of Nathan Ferguson

Comment: I waited a while to make a decision the first lot of references on the article are from primary sources and the Grays Athletic ref is pointing to a different player, other sources are noting his movement around the football league. Although they are notes of his name these few articles are not enough to pass to pass  in my opinion. Because the question is, is a match against an u23 academy team notable. I don't think it is, if you're not playing against another first team I would say this is notable but currently I would say it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: He has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning the article fails  and . Speculation as to future appearances is never grounds for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORT)

Comment: as pointed above, the subject plainly fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and  '''at present''', but has potential to become notable within the near future as the loan deal to Southport is only a 1 month deal. Suggest review at a later date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: Agree. But they aren't fully professional clubs in fully professional leagues. As has been mentioned elsewhere, matches between first teams in fully professional leagues, in cup competitions, is in keeping with the spirit of  despite not matching it to the letter
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Fails |NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. NFOOTY specifically discusses only fully professional ''leagues''. General consensus is that the spirit of this can be extended to cup competitions  when the matches are between teams from FPLs. However, in this instance the EFL trophy has specific team restrictions that fundamentally set it apart from other competitions. This is not a senior first team competition in the same way the FA Cup or football league are. GNG is also failed, the sources mentioned above are simple |routine transfer talk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG||WP:MILL)

Comment: passes notability at  as he has played in the EFL Trophy, played for a fully-professional team against fully-professional Category One academy side
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Fails  and . Current consensus is that players must have played in a |fully professional league to be considered notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:FPL)

Comment: fails  as he has not been the subject of ''significant'' coverage in reliable sources - transfer news is |routine, and the Daily Mail is not a RS to boot. He also fails  as he has not played in a competitive cup or league match between two clubs from |fully-professional leagues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:FPL)