Deletion of Rachana Shah (2nd nomination)

Comment: Thanks, guys. |Lack of notability seems about right, given what you've said. Alas, that leaves Book publishing people -> :Category:Book designers, nil
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails  and , and sources are insufficient for . The ''NYT'' article is about her husband, not her; it verifies the statements made but doesn't confer |notability. The bio on her own website is clearly not independent. The ''LA Review of Books'' doesn't mention her once, nor does ''The Independent''. The RISD list is just that - a mention in a list. Her resume doesn't count towards notability for obvious reasons and Amazon listings for her husband's books are equally unusable. The ''Timbuctoo'' website mentions her in passing only, and is not independent to boot. Frankly, the ''NYT'' article is the only thing here that even comes close to a useable source, and it's not enough for an article. The mentions she already gets in Tahir Shah|her husband's article are currently about all that can be said with the presently available sources, so there's nothing additional to merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: Seems to be a common name, some of whom experienced tragedy: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2005-03-02/mumbai/27867391_1_kandivli-murder-killers-security-arrangementshttp://www.hindu.com/2006/01/14/stories/2006011406810500.htmhttp://www.nowrunning.com/news/news.aspx?it=6648http://www2.tbo.com/news/south-shore/2008/mar/05/ss-saying-i-do-is-big-to-do-ar-228308http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-07-23/mumbai/29807026_1_suicide-note-seventh-floor-college-building. Information about the above noted Rachana Shah includes http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad-times/Mama-mia/articleshow/1403069.cms?curpg=3 Times of India February 7, 2006 and http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/30/garden/30cbox.html?pagewanted=print&_r=0 New York Times March 30, 2006. That is not enough source material to meet . Beyond this, seems unlikely there is enough source material out there for the topic to meet GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)