Deletion of Yehuda Kolko

Comment: Since when does an ''encyclopedia'' have articles on every suspected molester? Since when do we consider blog entries |reliable sources? Totally agree that this is entry is totally unsuitable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Leifern and IZAK, particularly due to the ibel issue.  There is no indication that the case has even gone to trial yet, let alone reached a verdict.  A mere "allegation" or "civil lawsuit" against a person is completely NN (unless the person is ''already'' notable, and even then it's questionable.)  The only possible notability at this point is that he is an "Orthodox Jewish rabbi", making this a Man-Bites-Dog story.  The article itself alludes to its NN, by acknowledging that the "impact of the allegations remains unclear."  Bottom line:  Delete now and revisit the issue once the criminal/civil cases are concluded and the societal impact becomes clear
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:L)