Deletion of Christopher Erskine (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Debater Christopher Erskine has an interview, which comprises the article '''(1)''' Blenkin, Max. (September 13, 1998) Australian Associated Press ''Fed: Great debate produced no knockout win.'' In that interview, he discussed in detail the September 1998 debate between Australian Prime Minister John Howard and Opposition Leader Kim Beazley. That's about it on the reliable source material. The attorney for the New South Wales Rural Fire Service is named http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=Rural+Fire+Service+Christopher+Erskine&btnG=Search Christopher Erskine. Either debater Christopher Erskine or attorney Christopher Erskine often writes letters to the editor of the The Canberra Times - a lot of letters. There is a U.S. film director named http://imdb.com/name/nm1348558/ Christopher Erskine. The attorney Christopher Erskine and U.S. film director Christopher Erskine might meet . Debater Christopher Erskine does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: Can this just be looked at objectively. The person has done a great job in setting up a competition. Whilst that makes him notable in a sense, it doesn't satisfy the guidelines under  for inclusion as an entry.  Coupled with the fact that he wants it removed, I think the community should just honour that request
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per  and .  However, it should be noted that the nominator has a |COI.  He has made disparaging comments about the subject, tried to add |OR and poorly sourced material, and has vandalized the page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:COI||WP:OR)