Deletion of Human chemistry

Comment: per #G11|CSD G11. Libb Thims claims to be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: This is a |vanity article by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY)

Comment: unless it can be shown that this is not a violation of  - particularly . There seems to be no serious third-party analysis of this concept cited in the article now that the book ''Human Chemistry'' can no longer be regarded as independent. I was being overly cautious - many of the citations are misleading and I question the encyclopaedic intention of this article. Nevertheless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: I believe there is notability for these concepts, but it may be better treated in one article than several that have unclear borderlines, and I suspect that article is interpersonal chemistry. I definitely think this article needs renaming at the least and rescoping at best outcome, because as is it seems to be about human biochemistry rather than a metaphor for interpersonal relations. There's something here, but how to organize it is the question. Right now there is an element of |synthesis throughout that doesn't seem backed up by a comprehensive secondary source review of the material
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)