Deletion of John Allen (Oxford University cricketer)

Comment: or redirect - the article was improved, but I don't really see -qualifying coverage (though I can't access the Telegraph article): much of it is match reports, the Oxford Mail isn't bad but it's local (not excluding it, but down-weighting considering it's the clearest/best source) and the remaining sources aren't independent (Oxford captains list, his school handbook). He is more notable for rugby and would prefer a redirect to a rugby-based page if possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: would be very marginal indeed on , but passes  on the basis of the expansion. The comment "nothing in sources" in the original AfD is risible based on the revised article, and makes it clear that there was no meaningful searching done before an AfD was submitted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Following the article having been updated, while his rugby league and rugby union careers are not notable, and his cricketing career are just notable, there looks just to be enough to pass  as stated by Wjemather
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)