Deletion of Harper Derangement Syndrome

Comment: Yes, I'm familiar with the term. Google it as a phrase, and you'll see it's been used in reliable sources, as have variants for Bush, Obama.... and yes, Trudeau. But this reads like such a blatant, textbook case of , such a clear attempt to use the term as an attack page, so contrary to  in the most fundamental way, and so lacking in any NPOV content worth preserving, and it should go. If somebody wants to try create an NPOV article for this subject, fine. This is an insult to the reader's intelligence and I would have certainly tried to speedily delete as an attack page, utterly devoid of encyclopaedic content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:N)

Comment: Simple poorly sourced political attack page designed to boost the credibility of the ruling party and denigrate the opposition, created by an editor with a long history of POV article creation in support of one specific political party. |Wikipedia is not a soapbox for your political views
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)