Deletion of Meitiv family

Comment: The ''http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/04/13/us/ap-us-walking-children-investigation.html?_r=0 New York Times'' says that "The case has drawn international media coverage..." and so its notability seems clear.  Deciding how and where to cover the matter is not a matter for AFD.  I don't like the term slow parenting which seems quite obscure but free-range parenting could use expansion and so we might merge into that to |preserve the material.  And I must say that the whole thing seems quite remarkable - what has happened to the "land of the free and the home of the brave?"  I walked to school by myself from an early age, used to go off to the park for hours with schoolfriends, take the bus to the library, &c.  Are children up to the age of 10 really expected to be under 24-hour surveillance now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I'm sorry if this sounds snotty, but did you consider running some searches |before creating this AfD? A https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=meitiv&tbm=nws Google News search for "meitiv" comes up with ''literally hundreds'' of news articles specifically about the Meitivs. These incidents been covered by all the major media outlets. NY Times, HuffPo, CNN, Fox News, WaPo, Free Press, Star Tribune, Dallas Morning News, Slate, USA Today, Daily Mail, Newsday, ABC, NY Daily News, NY Post, ChiTri, CBS, Guardian, LA Times... The list goes on and on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)