Deletion of Bravo Fleet

Comment: Seems quite notable and while I'm not sure it meets , I'm invoking 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:IAR)

Comment: I'm a senior member of BF, to be honest, but this group has been around for 8 years, and is a strong member of the Star Trek on-line gaming community. Using , We're not a paper encyclopedia, so, why can't we have a topic like this. Is it hurting anyone by keeping it there? I'm sure you can tell that I am an m:Inclusionism|Inclusionist. Its not slanderous, its verifiable, and we have kept sites that are just as non-notable before. Also, I don't see how it meets the  standard: It has won web design awards, and has been included in a book on Star Trek and the creator has been interviewed a couple of times. Also, I'd like to see some definitive reasons it is considered a vanity site . Is it enough to say it doesn't meet a number thresh-hold () and that it is vain () without citing why
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WEB||WP:VAIN||WP:WEB||WP:VAIN)