Deletion of Annisul Huq

Comment: ping|Zppix}} Would you care to elaborate on your deletion rationale? "Suspected autobiography" is not one of the classic -REASON|reasons for deletion. Wikipedia strongly discourages but does not prohibit autobiographies. If the theory that it's an autobiography is based on the fact that an {{U|Annisul Huq}} (who didn't create the article) has made one edit to it, then it's strange that their one edit was mostly to delete more than three paragraphs of unsourced material about how accomplished he is. If only more autobiographers were that helpful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: but '''stub''' unless sourcing is improved. Clearly meets  as mayor of Dhaka North City Corporation. The sourcing of the article is clearly not adequate for a  - it currently seems to consist of one deadlink, which would probably prove both reliable and independent if it were still live, and three others which seem to be primary, not independent of the subject or both. However, a quick search shows a number of clearly reliable sources for his mayoralty, so that (and thus his notability) at least can be established. Finally, as already pointed out above, the creator of the article has quite a different name from the subject, and absolutely no positive evidence has been presented for the deletion rationale that the article is autobiography has been presented beyond the fact that an editor with the same name as the subject has made precisely one recent edit to the article. At most, that would be an argument for reverting the edit - though, in this particular case, even that does not seem advisable as the edit, if anything, improved the article by cutting out quite a bit of puffery (if all autobiographical edits were of this standard, there would be far fewer objections to them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BLP)