Deletion of Machan(film)

Comment: The nominator may certainly have been acting in good faith when he sent this article directly to AFD when it was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Machan%28film%29&action=historysubmit&diff=419504498&oldid=419480211 just three hours old without first tagging it for concerns nor speaking with the new author about how it might be improved.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mister_fidget&action=history  But the fact that |so MANY reliable sources were easily found http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2008&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22Uberto+Pasolini%22%2C+%2BMachan&scoring=a&q=%22Uberto+Pasolini%22%2C+%2BMachan&lnav=od&btnG=Go makes me request that he give more consideration to the instructions at  prior to nominating anything in the future, specially as eletion policy explains the valid grounds for deletion, and strongly encourages that if the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing.  It was quite easy to take the nomimated stub and expand and source it.  And I hope the newb author has not been chased away
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE||WP:D)