Deletion of List of Masters of Cinema releases (2nd nomination)

Comment: as a valid split from a clearly notable parent article that shows that the list topic is notable with coverage in reliable sources. No valid reason for deletion except 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: to Masters of Cinema, and collapse table by default. I hatnoted Masters of Cinema for refimprove, yet right now, if that one was under discussion, I'd vote weak delete.  Despite the visible love here of cinephiles, there's no mainstream coverage of the label - they only get brief mentions when they release films.  Apparently the Masters of Cinema group (and with it the line) was bought by Eureka Entertainment. Nine pages of a targeted Google search for "Eureka Entertainment" also turns up not a single in-depth profile of the company - just name drops with the announcements of movies they released.  This almost seems like a classic case of notability not being inherited, unless someone can convincingly argue or find a carve-out in 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Indiscriminate, no 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: I am inclined to agree with , I could understand these titles being grouped in a category together, I am not sure I see the point of this list beyond being a catalog
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOG)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOGUE)