Deletion of Astronomical names in popular culture

Comment: yet another #DIR|directory of loosely associated items. They have nothing in common past happening to use one of potentially thousands if not tens of thousands of "astronomical names." Tells us nothing about the names, tells us nothing about the real objects with the names, tells us nothing abut the fiction that uses the names or their relation to each other and nothing about the real world. Ooh, I said "real world," quick, someone add it to the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: List of items that share no characteristics save that their names are those (or similar to those) of stars and planets. Uninformative both about the items listed and about the astronomical objects. Unacceptable per #DIR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: nominator did not carefully think out reasons for deletion or present a good case for deletion. Plus it appears to be flirting with breaking  due to the sheer nature of AFD's of this nature listed all at once. Just because an article is dealing with popular culture does not mean it has to be deleted. If anything, the opposite is more likely to be true. Due to the nature of popular culture an article to do with it would tend to have more potential references in the popular culture than others would have
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Just a collection of loosely associated topics, fails #DIR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Now we have ''names'' in popular culture? By definition that is #DIR of loosely related topics and indiscriminate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)