Deletion of Timeline of Amazon.com

Comment: agree with all of the above also  issues and duplicate content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: This is not a !vote!!! No valid rationale has been advanced to delete. "Unencyclopedic" is ''not'' a valid rationale. (). Nor is the fact that it was created by a paid-editing team. No evidence that the articles are spam. No notability issue; the subject is notable. Therefore, "keep" is the only option
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC)

Comment: I have Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia|inclusionist tendencies, but gimmeabreak. This is pure  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: There is some useful information here, but not enough to merit a |stand alone list.  All of these timelines should be merged into the articles on their respective companies, and then trimmed to eliminate the truly cruft bits
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL)