Deletion of Rachel Wilde

Comment: while agreeing that the previous article was too short, and unreferenced, and deserving of an AfD or a redirect, but there are numerous references such as http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/eastenders-rachel-wilde-jailed-hitting-2985557 here and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2544155/National-Television-Awards-2014-EastEnders-Rachel-Wilde-leads-way-worst-dressed.html here and http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/eastenders-rachel-wilde-jailed-hitting-2985557 here and http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/357070/EastEnders-Exclusive-A-Wilde-ride-for-Rachel here and http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/showbiz-news/rachel-wilde-flashes-flesh-red-6552991 here and http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/eastenders-spoilers-bianca-chucks-nikki-3560896 here and http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/25856770 here which discuss her career, her (infamous) lack of clothing on a National Awards show (such a lame celebrity trick isn't it), her acting on ''EastEnders'', suggesting she well meets |notability requirements and meets the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:GNG)

Comment: passes . Enough significant third party coverage is found to establish notability. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)