Deletion of Ace of Spades HQ (3rd nomination)

Comment: Site won CPAC Blogger Of The Year award, 2009, therefore notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This blog seems to be an often-referenced and relatively influential conservative blog, as evidenced by a number of refences in widely-read national newspapers, which I found in a brief google news archive search: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Ace+of+Spades+HQ%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&start=0.  This far exceeds the nominator's argument of non-notability based on there being only two good sources.  Also, the blog has been discussed in peer-reviewed journals: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=info:4jlR-hzWMasJ:scholar.google.com/&output=viewport&pg=1, http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a906953402~db=all.  Here is a book verifying that the site has 13000+ visits per day: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lfveI4ppj0sC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=%22Ace+of+Spades+HQ%22&ots=4UOLU0R1NB&sig=gVejaK5OT4z3pMBXxxdLb48Y8zQ#PPA78,M1.  A large amount of content, stances, and predictions of the blog are |verifiable in |reliable sources.  Personally, I think the inclusion of this topic and ones like it are interesting and enrich wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)