Deletion of NOLAP

Comment: I can't find any evidence that this |neologism represents a |notable framework or class of OLAP systems, much less a //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Online_analytical_processing&diff=606628026 "global standard", and conversation with the article creator on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/NOLAP|this discussion's talk page confirms the impression that the article is indeed |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: It is mostly . There is very little in the way of secondary and primary sources to support the article. Even your website article posts back to this WP article page, with only 3 other Google page hits supporting both this term and the concept, also linking to this page. In addition to that, the article also advances a narrow field, specific to certain financial reporting products. It also focuses on XBRL. Why? There is many more reasons.  I hope it doesn't put you off
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)