Deletion of Drunken chess boxing

Comment: Why didn't I speedy? Because no criterion really fits - A7 only applies to non-notable people, groups, companies and web content, not games, and I think this is probably a good faith article by someone who genuinely didn't understand why the game he invented with a couple of his mates shouldn't be on Wikipedia, so G3 doesn't apply. G1 specifically excludes things like this, so here we are. However, I think a case could now be made for a speedy closure under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: per  - hoax, or at least non-notable, original research, unsourced, unverified, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)