Deletion of Caméléon language

Comment: No evidence has been presented that it satisfies  or any relevant notability subguideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Sources provided are  and thus, not helpful.  Further the article is self-promotional.  The author is of the article is one of the authors of this new language, which is an obvious onflict of interest.  Wikipedia is not a means of , nor a RYSTALBALL of things that may someday become notable, nor for things you 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:C||WP:PROMOTION||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:MADEUP)