Deletion of The Fight for Canada

Comment: The only criterion of  this book has a chance of meeting is criterion one. It requires that the book be the subject of ''two'' or more non-trivial published works independent of the book. At first glance, we have four sources: the Huffington Post article, the footnote, the Calgary Herald article, and the academic review from persee.fr. However, Primefac said he made a mistake and that the Huffington Post article didn't really exist after all, so that can be disregarded. The "article" from the Calgary Herald is actually not about the book, but rather about the author (it only mentioned the book once). That leaves us with the academic review and the footnote. But a footnote can't really be called a non-trivial ''work''; it's more of a passing mention. We're left with only the academic review, which is not enough to meet the book notability criteria (it requires two non-trivial independent sources). Therefore, I think the justification for keeping this article is quite weak
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: It passes  with https://books.google.com/books?id=ZJb6qt5uMbwC&pg=PA201&lpg=PA201&dq=%22Four+Centuries+of+Resistance+to+American+Expansionism%22&source=bl&ots=XaSRntnP4z&sig=yAVjDcliow7LW2PfodH3gg1yzsA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEAQ6AEwB2oVChMI1oaQ0MysyAIVCU6ICh1MSQLv#v=onepage&q=%22Four%20Centuries%20of%20Resistance%20to%20American%20Expansionism%22&f=false this footnote, http://www.persee.fr/doc/rbph_0035-0818_1996_num_74_2_7066_t1_0531_0000_2 this academic review, and http://www.pressreader.com/canada/calgary-herald/20150606/281930246595464/TextView this newspaper article. It needs rewritten, though, as it's insufficient as-is. Apparently the book's author has a reputation among some as an anti-free trade crank so it could be notable because of the author
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)