Deletion of Azkadellia

Comment: per Xymmax above; Arguably, characters from Tin Man, being a singular work, would not ordinarily be worth their own entries, as opposed to a single page that deals with all the characters. But given the "under construction" banner, I'd like to see what comes of the page first. If it merely echoes the  mindset that is echoed in many of the responses here, then I'd vote for deletion. If it can be truly fleshed out, then it would be worth keeping, IMO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: FWIW, I am not seeking to assert any parallels other than what Sci Fi itself documents, and  I have no wish to somehow slip any OR on parallels in "under the radar".  If the article goes against a general stylistic guideline specifying that comparisons betwen TWOO and Tin Man belong in either article, or that character parallels belong in a comparison page, then I'm happy to hold all my edits and incorporate the (sourced) material in those pages.  I do not, however, agree with any ''general'' dogmatic prohibition on forking of character pages from works of popular fiction.  IMO,  gives enough latitude to allow pages for '''central''' characters of a film, miniseries, or book that already has its own page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per #PLOT, , and . The article is basically a bunch of excess plot detail, counter to Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), and original research (and not particularly accurate at that--re-viewing the online video, I get a different number(s) of 'mobat'-related tattoos, and can't find a |source to verify which is correct). Unlike Winnie the Pooh or James T. Kirk, Azkadellia is not well known outside of ''Tin Man (TV miniseries)'', and is just like the Wicked Witch with some arbitrary plot devices slathered on, just like the rest of the main characters. For what it's worth I did watch all three parts and overall enjoyed it--I just don't think any of the individual characters warrant separate articles, outside the brief summaries at Tin Man (TV miniseries)|Tin Man. Most of the keep comments above seem to me to be variations of  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)