Deletion of Google Feedback

Comment: just not notable, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: To repeat my comment on the article's talk page from when I posted a notability tag there, "The article doesn't present any information about the feedback feature on Google websites that materially sets it apart from feedback links on many other websites so as to indicate why an article just for Google's feedback is warranted. References to sources dealing specifically and amply with Google's feedback mechanism are needed to validate this focus on the subject." (Blackbombchu has suggested having an article with the title "Internet feedback" instead, but that's a separate matter. I suspect that there hasn't been any ''general'' coverage of the feedback feature on various websites either.) I am finding pages where it's discussed: http://dsheiko.com/weblog/support-request-tool-like-google-feedback, http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/software-engineering-and-development/software-testing/9780132851572/the-test-engineering-manager/ch04lev1sec11, https://microsites.csusm.edu/librarywebdev/2012/03/googles-feedback-reporting-tool-is-pretty-cool/, http://www.steegle.com/websites/google-sites-howtos/report-an-issue, http://www.webpronews.com/google-news-gets-feedback-tool-2012-01, http://www.quora.com/Why-are-there-so-many-weird-implementations-of-Google-Feedback-in-Google-products-it-seems-like-Feedback-is-exceptionally-important-in-order-to-move-a-Google-product-forward-If-this-is-the-case-why-arent-there-more-standard-implementations-of-it-through-products-and-why-is-it-not-treated-as-a. No |reliable sources, but definitely signs of Google Feedback being a topic of discussion, as far as that goes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as not passing  with multiple, reliable, independent, in-depth sources. Nothing I can find treats the topic as the subject of an article/feature besides tutorials or unreliable sources. The topic itself is trivial, every big service has customer support, and unless there are sources for this one, I don't see why it should be an exception. (Disclaimer: saw the link to this from a proposal by the author to change inclusion/verifiability standards on VP.) —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)