Deletion of Katarzyna Dolinska (3rd nomination)

Comment: I know she's a working model, but does a model getting work automatically become notable?  Yes, there's the whole ''America's Next Top Model'' aspect of it as well, but she didn't win or finish high (wasn't she 5th in her cycle or something?), nor has she done anything notable as an entertainer/personality since her appearance.  I really don't believe that she meets ; she has ''not'' received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  I mean, if you take out the fansite galleries (which are an obvious copy-vio, but we'll ignore that for now) and her modelling agencies, you're left with links to magazines.  There are no articles, no interviews, no news reports, no nothing.  Honestly, most of these "sources" would not pass .  I understand that she's a fan favourite, but honestly, there are major general notability and sourcing issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Will those who are opining to keep please provide evidence that subject passes the |general notability standards and the |notability standards for models?  Again, a model working her little butt off as a model is in no way notable, she did not finish in top 3 on ''ANTM'' so that show confers no notability to this model.  To the above poster, if there are other model articles where the subjects do not pass muster with our criteria then those articles need to be deleted as well
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ENTERTAINER)