Deletion of Wild beasts (2nd nomination)

Comment: as author - The major claims that the band meet  is the article in the http://music.guardian.co.uk/rock/story/0,,1972106,00.html guardian newspaper and being put on the BBC_6_Music|BBC 6Music http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/brain_surgery/tracklisting_20061222.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/mint/tracklisting_20061126.shtml playlist. Just being signed by domino records doesn't mean they meet , they would have to release 2 albums on their label to do this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: 1)''' All topics must meet a minimum threshold of notability in order for an article on that topic to be included in Wikipedia. Per Wikipedia:Notability, a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and each other to ensures that there exists enough source material to write a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic.  The article now has several cited works, at least two of which appear to be the required non-trivial published works.  As a second reason for meeting Wikipedia:Notability, the article now appears to be a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic.  Thus, the article appears to meet Wikipedia:Notability policy requirements.  Since the article appears to meet this policy, I believe it inherently meets the  guidance that depends from that policy. '''(2 AfD#1)''' Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wild_beasts|AfD#1 concerns about not meeting  have been addressed in the article.  '''(3 DR#1)''' http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_November_7&diff=prev&oldid=87960173 Deletion Review's concerns regarding actual present notability and  have been addressed in the article.  '''(4 DR#2''') Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_January_13|Deletion Review #2's request that actual citations to information be added to article have been addressed in the article. '''(5)'''  As QuagmireDog points out, this band is going places and media interest in this topic seems more likely than not.  I agree that signing with Domino Records needs to be verified or removed from the article, but I the topic appears to meet Wikipedia:Notability without it. '''(6)''' In view of the above, this article should be '''kept''' because it does comply with Wikipedia policy, there is foreseeable media interest in this topic, and Wikipedians do have enough interest in this article to address the concerns brought up in the AfD#1, DR#1, DR#2, and this AfD#2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Appears to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: article in Guardian and presence on 6Music passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)