Deletion of The American Journal of Managed Care

Comment: The relevant guideline for academic journals, according to ikiProject Academic Journals, is . That guideline suggests that being reindexed by selective indices or having an impact factor are enough to establish notability (see #Notes and examples|§ Notes and examples points 1 and 2). Academic journals, especially those in niche subject areas, are unlikely to have the depth of coverage necessary to satisfy , so a more specific notability guideline is necessary. So, if this journal is indexed and abstracted in Science Citation Index and has an impact factor of 3.0 according to ''Journal Citation Reports'', then that's enough for an article. It should probably be reorganized according to the guidelines at , though. The existing mentions of indexing/abstracting were removed as copyvio
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:NJOURNALS||WP:NJOURNALS||WP:GNG||WP:JWG)

Comment: I don't see that WikiProjects and essays override widely-respected guidelines. "Academic journals, especially those in niche subject areas, are unlikely to have the depth of coverage" - that's precisely why we should not have articles on most of them: There's nothing to say except to give them a space for self-representation. Even that essay says: "The merits of an article on the journal will depend largely on the extent to which the material is verifiable through third-party sources." That would be grounds for , I'd say
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)