Deletion of Bean queen

Comment: It is notable if you consider notable an un-sourced statement that "Bean queen is a term used in the English-speaking gay community to refer to a white person" who dates Hispanics. How is that notable?  "A topic is '''notable''' if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable" (from ). Where are the sources? Without them, there is nothing to even Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify. Moreover, how is ''Bean queen'' not a neologism? "Neologism are words and terms that have recently been coined, generally do not appear in any dictionary, but may be used widely or within certain communities" (from EO). All the supposed assertion of notability in the article has done is assert it is a neologism. And WINAD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NEO)

Comment: I think it might help everyone if you calmed down. Your reason for nomination to which I responded was just a collection of links to policy with no discernible argument, which have cut and pasted from every one of these numerous AfDs. I'm sure you have an important |point to make but, instead of presenting your rationale to objecting to the article in the first place, you seem to prefer to respond in an unnecessarily hostile manner to whoever opposes you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: and warn nominator about being |civil to other editors. There is no need for rudeness on WP; if anything, it makes one's arguments look weaker
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: What is the specific violation of  in this case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: keep per discussion, speedy per .  This goes a little farther than being a mere dicdef.  If anything, it ''may'' be transwiki'd to wiktionary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Speedy Keep Copy & paste nom.  The concept of a "bean queen" is more than the definition of the term, so  doesn't apply.  |Notability is established and EO|neologism is denied by its commonplace usage within media and popular culture (~20,000 Google hits).  |Verifiability is Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Problem articles where deletion may not be needed|no reason to delete the article, and the prevalence of the concept outside the article denies allegations of |original research.  None of this information was difficult to come by, and the lack of due diligence in making this nomination concerns me.  Are you trying to |make a point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD||WP:N||WP:NEO||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:POINT)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:POINT)