Deletion of Simone Bailly

Comment: Passes . Her performances have been reviewed. See https://books.google.com/books?id=TccYDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA35&dq=%22Simone+Bailly%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwje6_-RipDmAhWmo1kKHbKnAW8Q6AEwAHoECAMQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Simone%20Bailly%22&f=false this review of her Shakespear performance. Other reviews include
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: In regards to the nomination: actors need to meet , "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions", not . Third party sources (by which I presume independent, reliable sources) can indeed be found - I have just added two to the article. She has certainly had starring roles, as in ''Bong of The Dead'', but whether that is notable is debatable. Contemporary listings for ''Good Luck Chuck'' say "Starring Jessica Alba, Dane Cook, Dan Fogler, Michelle Harrison, Simone Bailly", and I'm not sure why IMDB and the Wikipedia article rate the importance of the roles/actors differently. Bailly's role in the 4th and 5th seasons of ''The L Word'' was significant. I will see what else I can find, and try to improve the article a bit
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: Actors do not automatically pass  just because roles happen to be listed — the notability test is the ability to demonstrate the ''significance'' of the roles through the use of reliable source content that singles them out for attention, but the sources listed above aren't sufficient. The Shakespeare book gives her exactly one sentence in a review of a play, technically verifying that she had a ''supporting'' role in a minor local theatre production, but not substantively enough ''about'' her performance to clear the bar all by itself if it's the best you can actually do. The ''Last Wedding'' review just mentions her name in the fine-printed complete credits block at the very end right alongside ''everybody'' else who was in the film ''at all'', and doesn't give her even one word of space in the actual body text of the review itself — and her role in that film was a bit part as an unnamed receptionist, not a starring role significant enough to count toward NACTOR. I can't find the Hollywood Reporter review of ''14 Hours'' at all to verify whether it focuses on her performance or just mentions her name, but it would still be subject to the same issue as the other two sources. We're not looking for sources which offer technical verification that roles have been had — we're looking for sources which demonstrate the ''significance'' of the roles by singling her performances out for dedicated ''attention''. And even on a ProQuest search, I'm finding nothing else: I get nine hits total, eight of which are glancing namechecks of her existence in sources that say literally nothing else about her, and the one that's slightly stronger is just a ''repeat'' of the ''same'' review that was excerpted in the Shakespeare book, and thus isn't a new second source. This is simply not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)