Deletion of Stubble (webcomic)

Comment: What is going on in this AfD is precisely the same controversy that happens repeatedly with webcomics with some local recognition (i.e. among a small, close community) and little to no global notability. The  standard is not precise enough to determine these cases, so by default (and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Webcomics|precedent) we will end up including them regardless of the individual vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per  and if anyone is interested, leave a redirct to Josh Mirman which already has a section on this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V)

Comment: per nom and Isotope23. All the arguing in the world about whether it "should" have been relisted this soon or by a certain person is irrelevant; the site doesn't meet , so bye-bye
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: actually, it is probably better to relist it now and get a clear consensus.  A true Keep would be a strong argument against a future AfD whereas a No Consensus basically means we will have this exact same conversation again in a few months when someone else comes across Stubble (webcomic), sees that it fails  miserably, and pops it up for AfD.  I still support deletion, but if keep is the consensus, perhaps an info box in the discussion page stating that will avoid a rehash of this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per  (and  by extension) No good sources means no article without doing original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:WEB)

Comment: no references to reputable sources, I haven't been able to find any, article does not appear to meet  notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)