Deletion of Stone Makers

Comment: A nomination for a top-level film award like the Canadian Screen Award for Best Short Documentary most certainly ''is'' enough to pass  — it ''always'' has been enough before, and I fail to see why that should suddenly change now. By comparison, ''every'' film listed in Academy Award for Best Documentary (Short Subject) (the most immediate equivalent to this award elsewhere) is already a blue link, with not a single redlinked or unlinked title anywhere in that entire article — and it's not the least bit difficult to find within that list films that have ''no'' other claim of notability besides the ''nomination'', and are sourced no better than this. As well, Emmy or CSA nominations ''are'' enough in and of themselves to get television shows over , and film directors over , and actors or actresses over ; Grammy or Juno or Polaris award nominations are enough in and of themselves to get musicians and their albums over ; Pulitzer or Giller or Booker nominations are enough in and of themselves to get writers and their books over  and . So it makes literally no sense whatsoever for films to somehow be the ''only'' subject area in all of encyclopediadom where a ''nomination'' for a top-level award is somehow ''not'' enough. Furthermore, the article does include a source that discusses the film in ''much'' greater detail than just including its name in a list of nominees — I ''always'' wait until I can find ''more'' sourcing than just the list of nominees itself, whereas editors working with Academy Award nominees often ''don't'' — so notability is properly covered off. Does it need ''more'' before it can be considered a ''good'' article? Yes, absolutely, that's why I put a stub notice on it. But it already has enough sourcing, and a reasonable notability claim, to be a keepable article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:TVSHOW||WP:CREATIVE||WP:NACTOR||WP:NMUSIC||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NBOOK)