Deletion of Jack W. Carter (2nd nomination)

Comment: per , without prejudice toward recreation at a later time if/when  and  can be more soundly met.  My !vote at the first AFD was based upon my thoughts that the topic ''might'' be able to show enough (even if minimally) notability to serve the project.  My current thought is that while I did find that his lead role in the horror film Sparrow (2010 film)|''Sparrow'' had received more-than-trivial-mention in http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/local/it_s_a_wrap_on_set_of_horror_flick_1_1949815 ''The Courier'' http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/news_cityoffilm/news_cityoffilm_news/8113749.Store_staff_bag_roles_in_terror/ ''Telegraph and Argus'' http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/local-west-yorkshire-news/2010/03/19/waterloo-and-brighouse-actors-jordan-greenhough-and-jack-carter-to-star-in-polish-feature-film-sparrow-86081-26064629/ ''The Examiner'' and several others, a problem granted here is that, with his minimal career and only ''one'' significant role in one notable production, we have a current failure of . And, while the currently available coverage might be seen to tweak at , it is only for ''Sparrow'' and so makes this a . Actors usually end up doing more than role in their careers. The Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BerylTurns50/Archive|un-clued author editing the topichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:OohAahJustaLittleBithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keith1234http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikitrueforeverhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SheepGoBaaa and arguing for its retention aside, we clued editors can allow recreation if and when the actor gains a second significant role in a second notable production.  Puppets negatively colored the topic which might later be notable enough for us... but for now... nope
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYA||WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)