Deletion of Bob Howard (academic)

Comment: The term "major, well-established academic journal" in clause 8 of  does ''not'' equate with, nor logically imply, notability in Wikipedia's technical sense (). A journal's status as "major" can be established by reference to citations, impact, and editorial policy, even if we can't find sources specifically ''about'' the journal, such as we would need to write a Wikipedia article about it. We can't confirm the impact of ''Current Affairs Bulletin'' quantitatively through, e.g., SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), as we could for a contemporary journal; but we can observe that in Google Scholar, it's easy to find scholarly citations to ''Current Affairs Bulletin'', although it's not easy to find accessible full text for this journal that ceased publication in 1998
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:N)

Comment: I don't see this meeting . ''Current Affairs Bulletin'' is not a significant publication; I don't think editorship here would confer notability under PROF, and there's nothing better. Accomplishments are not significant; does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Clearly notable as a former editor of the ''Current Affairs Bulletin'', as a current member of the executive council of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Australia’s oldest think tank, and as a Fellow of Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security.  ot paper.  The history of the original editor of this article is an Ad hominem fallacious argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: editorship of ''Current Affairs Bulletin'' (a journal published by the University of Sydney, so of good repute) satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Can't see much for . As for , the guideline specifies a "major, well-established academic journal". The ''Current Affairs Bulletin'' appears to be, from what I can tell, a fairly minor publication (it seems unlikely to be notable itself, in fact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)