Deletion of Daniel T. Lewis

Comment: He did 2014 Tennessee gubernatorial election|run for governor as well, but you're right to say that failed political candidates are not inherently notable. The only significant coverage I can find if from local news: https://www.chattanoogan.com/2004/3/3/47522/Libertarian-Daniel-Lewis-Qualifies-For.aspx 1, https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2014/oct/15/libertarian-candidate-will-appear-independent-tenn/269641/ 2, which are of Talk:The_Chattanoogan|questionable reliability and in any event not much more than local coverage. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: Unsuccessful candidates are not notable just for being candidates per se, so the tests he would have to pass to qualify for an article are that either (a) he already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten him an article ''regardless'' of his candidacy, or (b) he can be referenced to a depth and range and volume of |reliable source coverage that marks his candidacy out as ''much more special'' than everybody else's candidacies. But neither of those are in evidence here: being chairman of a political party's local chapter in one city is not a meaningful notability claim, and the referencing is almost entirely to |primary sources with no evidence whatsoever that he passes the coverage test. Also, the article was created by a user named "Lewisdt2", so there was a clear  here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COI)