Deletion of Johan Bäckman (2nd nomination)

Comment: He hasn't been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. His notability is based upon , being the controversy surrounding the Bronze soldier. I could self publish some books, create an Australian anti-fascist committee with two of my buddies and organise a protest or two with a dozen other buddies attacking the basis of New Zealand's statehood, but  it wouldn't make me any more notable for inclusion into Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: Looking at the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johan_B%C3%A4ckman&oldid=238542522 deleted version, he's an adjunct professor at two Finnish universities? He's also published numerous publications? And given http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Johan%20B%C3%A4ckman%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps citations in scholar in regards to Estonian/Finnish/Russian history, he is certainly notable.  is not reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)