Deletion of Troyce Guice

Comment: There is insufficient weight in the form of independent, reliable sources to establish notability under  and no alternative approach under  appears to be satisfied. Most of the sources utilized here (those that can still be accessed anyway) mention the article's subject only in passing and thus do not constitute the the substantial, in-depth coverage expected of sources for purposes of a notability analysis, and the titles of the other (now dead) links don't suggest any deeper coverage for the most part and, under the circumstances, I don't think we can presume otherwise without archived versions of those sources to establish otherwise.  Furthermore, with eleven years having passed since the article's creation, I think we can presume that if there were additional interest in the subject and sources covering him since his death, they would have manifested by now.  All the information taken together, deletion seems appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: per nom, pretty clearly fails  and there isn't significant coverage to make him notable beyond that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: per all of the above, and . This was created 11 years ago - the wild west period of Wikipedia, when we had much more lax standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)