Deletion of Ugartsthal

Comment: Just by going from English language sources, this most certainly was a real village.https://books.google.com/books?id=QCCpDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT57&dq=Ugartsthal&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8rZ3lmqTZAhVr1oMKHZW1CIAQ6AEILTAB#v=onepage&q=Ugartsthal&f=false  Even if there is a "partial" copyvio, -CONTENT|AfD is not the answer.  Just remove the the copyvio content.  It can be reduced to a stub if need be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: AfD is about notability, not quality. Clear pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: per  - the village clearly existed per the article and cursory BEFORE. On procedural grounds this is a wrong nomination - a copyvio should've gone to a speedy deletion request, not AfD, if on the entire article. I do not see the copyvio at the moment - but if it was on part of the article, that part should've been redacted (and revdelled
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)