Deletion of Air Force One photo op incident

Comment: it still violates . I don't see that the long-term effects are noteworthy enough to grant notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: standard  case. Merge would be a distant second
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: and yes, I'm from the U.S.).   and in 20 years no one except the occasional astonished Wikipedia reader will remember this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: As I said in part the last time; ". A one day hoopla not important enough to stand on its own...".  Many, if not all, of the "keep" callers display a fundamental misunderstanding of why news events are unencyclopedic.  Yea, drive-by media had a field day with this for ''a few days'', but that is ''all''.  This event had ZERO lasting significance or importance; coverage of the mini-event dropped to virtually nothing not even a week or two later.  Per NOTNEWS, there is no "enduring notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: While an interesting incident it still fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: or '''Merge''' to the 9/11 extended effects subsection. I might be more convinced if it didn't fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: As per  this is just a news event and is not notable for an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)