Deletion of Defeating ISIS

Comment: i will not be 'voting' as the article creator has left a message on my talkpage about this afd in case it is construed as , however (oh, here we go:)), the nom, {{u|DHeyward}}, may like to revisit  ie. "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." and actually explain how this "Book fails GNG" and have a look at  specifically no. 1 - "The book has been the subject1 of two or more non-trivial2 published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.3 This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists,4 and reviews." and explain how this book does not meet this, anyhow i'm going indoors as it is starting to |snow
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASSING||WP:GNG||WP:NBOOK||WP:SNOW)

Comment: Notable book. Per  Criteria number one (1). ''The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself.'' Namely, ''Journal of Strategic Security'', ''Current Affairs (magazine)|Current Affairs'', and ''The Australian
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: per  1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BOOKCRIT)