Deletion of Laurie Michelle Bridges

Comment: I am the annoying one who deprodded this. Giving an overview of  criteria I found that: She has an h-score somewhere betweeen 5 and 8 as https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=hDvIfJgAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao google scholar and https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=24174110400 scopus give different results. Upwards of 300+ citations, and at least 12 publications. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00907321011045061/full/html One publication has 132 citations, and another has 43 and she was not first author on it. Most publications with high citations are older. So while she has not published a lot, it does seem like what she does public is rather noteworthy. It also doesn't appear to be a http://profiles.catalyst.harvard.edu/?pg=bibliometrics&tool=jbr&task=search&field=Library+Science top journal either. I am not familiar with the averages in library science, and I wasn't able to find it. I am inclined to say no it doesn't meet C1, but if this proves to be near averages I may change my assessment. As for all the other criteria, she seems to fails C2-C8 as I was not able to find evidence of her meeting any of those. I could not find any major new articles, secondary sources, or similar on her which leads me to believe she fails  as well, and does not pass  if that were a possible consideration
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Fails  and  as per above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)