Deletion of Barfüßiger Februar (2nd nomination)

Comment: Müller is a "praised" novelist? Really? She won the Nobel Prize for this body of work. This is textbook #5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: The nomination seems to violate our |deletion policy: "''It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hopes of getting a different outcome.''".  The claims that these works are not notable are blatantly false. ''Barfüßiger Februar'', for example, is the subject of a whole volume of literary criticism:  ''Fleischfressendes Leben
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: Herta Müller received 24 awards in 30 years. Granted, I am quite impressed by this as this is an achievement. And I do not want to downplay this in any way. However I still cannot see the encyclopedic value of these one line articles. This information is just a fork of the information in Herta Müller#Works, where it fits quite well. In which way does this kind of |content forking improve the encyclopedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: These literary works resulted in their author winning a Nobel Prize, which I think most people would agree is the most prestigious prize for literature in the world.  Of course, they are notable for that reason alone. They meet #5. Stubs on notable topics are an OK beginning, and these short articles can be expanded and improved over time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)