Deletion of Chris Par

Comment: no evidence or  supporting . Being a write in candidate or wanna be candidate does not make one notable. Nor does being a party legend. As the article says, he "saw minor success in album sales". One must not mistake flamboyance and self promotion for notability. I agree with the observations made by Reynhart, Cindy, Acroterion, and MelanieN
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Having gone over the article's history, I found it was the work of a sole contributor (others were established users performing maintenance and tagging) . Now while I think any editor w/ his prosaic skill should be retained, I am troubled by the use he put his skills to and by the fact that this is the 4rth iteration of an article on a subject that does not meet the  and whose purpose seems promotional. I still think it should be ed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SALT)

Comment: Fails  &  by wide margins. No ''significant coverage'' in |reliable sources to speak of, just a few passing mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:RS)

Comment: and '''salt'''. Fails . A search for sources revealed nothing beyond what is already in the article, which amounts to exceedingly brief mentions in articles about Floatopia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: if such a thing exists - otherwise, the regular brand will do). Is below par in terms of  requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)