Deletion of Wikinfo (3rd nomination)

Comment: There's nothing I can add to the very well done nomination, except to lament the fact that the above "Keep" opinions amount to nothing more than -type handwaving. Seriously, this website has had no substantial coverage by reliable sources for a long time now, and next to nothing verifiable can be written about it. It's ''non-notable'' in the extreme, whether or not we like it in our capacity as Wikipedians. (Disclaimer: I was the nominator in AFD #2 and was brought here by http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASandstein&diff=105324385&oldid=105231580 this notice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: fails . No reliable secondary sources. It's like feeding the trolls, really. Owww, wait... they've referred to me in their articles now. Hmmph. http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=The_Truth_That_Dare_Not_Speak_Its_Name. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: doesn't fail , , and  enough for me to feel comfortable that it's better to delete it than source it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS)