Deletion of Tomie: Re-birth

Comment: and continue improvements... per meeting  per . Many genre sources available,http://www.google.com/#q=%22Tomie:+Re-birth%22&hl=en&prmdo=1&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=GtHTT6GuJOnY0QG6xaGaAw&ved=0CCkQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=c22c1b63d6f60ec6&biw=855&bih=495http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0348225/externalreviews  http://www.google.com/#q=%22Tomie%3A+Re-birth%22&hl=en&tbm=bks&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&ei=w83TT8y8JsGN6QH65ryzAw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=1&ved=0CBgQ_AUoAA&prmdo=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=121a6bd6047ee671&biw=855&bih=495 among which are such as Film Threat and DVD Talk which, contrary to the nom's opinion, are emminently suitable for sourcing horror genre films. While yes, the stub as http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tomie%3A_Re-birth&diff=496717258&oldid=479059965 first nominated, did not offer much, that was then... and the Tomie: Re-birth|former stub has proven to be improvable through use of English-language sources (nice for a Japanese film). We generally do not delete or redirect stubs on notable topics if it is shown the stub can be expanded and improved over time and through regular editing. And, as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NRVE)