Deletion of Tracie Andrews

Comment: As I've alluded to elsewhere, I think there should be more discussion in /CA, OT#NEWS, and  regarding what constitutes "significant coverage". As noted above, Andrews has been discussed in a documentary and a true crime television series. She has been mentioned in various http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Tracie%20Andrews%22%20-wikipedia&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp books, the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Tracie+Andrews%22 news coverage is persistent (e.g. http://www.sundaymercury.net/news/midlands-news/2009/06/22/road-rage-killer-tracie-andrews-wants-new-identity-97319-23943034/, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7288543.stm), and she is still http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191389/Road-rage-murderer-Tracie-Andrews-gets-5-000-plastic-surgery-taxpayers-expense.html tabloid fodder ten years after the crimes. She is no John Hinckley, Jr., but I think she has received coverage that "ordinary murderers" don't receive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I do not read  to mandate deletions of articles. It simply mandates that non-notable individuals not get biographies just because they play a role in a single  notable event. Her notability does not rest in one event. Andrews may have originally become notable due to her involvement in one event but she is now notable for other events: her trial, her conviction, her sentence. She recently had an article in regards to surgery. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191389/Road-rage-murderer-Tracie-Andrews-gets-5-000-plastic-surgery-taxpayers-expense.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)