Deletion of Joint Directed Action

Comment: I'm forced to agree, unfortunately. Somebody made up everything, so I discount that a bit - the concept has to begin somewhere, and an apparently well-researched and reviewed paper is a good start. Fair enough. But the critical issue here is that the concept is not (yet) notable, in that it has not been discussed by third parties unrelated to the subject. If other journals or publications take up the thread of this paper and discuss it, then it gains some notability. While I do not doubt the author's good faith or her abilities, the fact remains that this article is essentially "This is so, and I can prove it because I said so in this paper too", which doesn't meet our criteria for |verifiability. As an aside, I'd be interested to read the paper, as it sounds fascinating - but an article here is probably a bit premature. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Sorry but Joint Directed Action is thus far supported by just one source and it's the original research in the dissertation. Being peer reviewed means the new theory has been accepted in that field of academia, but inclusion in Wikipedia is based on |notability which is much different than peer review
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)