Deletion of NeuroQuantology

Comment: per  and . I don't see how waiving your hands around saying that this could be improved works
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: while scam is a bit harsh, and items published in the journal have had some media attention (from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/07/17/the-family-that-walks-on-all-fours-and-why-they-cant-stand-up/ The Washington Post to https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/3590729/things-you-need-to-know-about-your-vagina-blow-drying-workouts/ The Sun (NSFW)), on searching the internet and perusing the  https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/11600154151 Scopus profile I don't quite see how this passes GNG or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNAL)

Comment: it's a journal of nonsense, but a notable one being indexed in Scopus (and in the past in Web of Science/JCR), and is relatively well cited https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22NeuroQuantology%22 for a nonsense journal. Coverage in ''The Lancet Neurology'' and others makes this pass  handily. &#32
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)