Deletion of Kristy Holtfreter

Comment: The case for passing #C1 is good, and the article content seems rather dry and unprovocative. It would help to get confirmation that the person requesting deletion really is the subject (sadly, a harasser trying to get a woman's page deleted sounds all too plausible, for example). As to the sourcing concerns, while additional secondary sources would be good, there's a big difference between using a CV as a reference and writing an article in the manner of a CV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes rof. I'm not sure of the veracity of the requests for deletion. If they are genuine I would not object to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per . Sure, she may pass WP:NPROF but it's not clear to me from the google search nor article that she passes the GNG. In that, independent reliable sources write enough about HER or her writings to support an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL)

Comment: as per request of the subject / . This is a person who has not sought publicity and female academics get enough crap as it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL)

Comment: per {{U|Vincentvikram}} - we have tended to delete articles about |academics who are |marginally notable and request deletion of their article. I would agree with this longstanding practice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BARE)

Comment: The subject is definitely notable under #C1 and #C8. However,  is a fairly technical guideline, and I feel that in the case of authenticated  requests (such as this one), there needs to be a stronger case for notability, preferably under  or , in order to override the subject's wishes. Here the available coverage appears to be insufficient to establish clear notability under  or . I would have much preferred for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: The case for notability through #C1 and highly cited publications https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nXQdt1oAAAAJ is not marginal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)