Deletion of Fanya Ismail

Comment: I've searched, and I cannot find  for this product developer/scientist who was one of several persons to win an annual non-notable award
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Sufficient reliable sourcing to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Maybe. She seems like she might barely meet  but her notability as far as  is concerned is a little dubious. That said, she has some mentions in Gov.Uk's website https://www.gov.uk/government/news/women-in-innovation-9-female-led-businesses-backedhttps://www.gov.uk/government/news/9-women-innovators-get-government-backing-for-inventions-with-global-potential concerning her status as an award-winner. There is the case that because she represents a niche of Kurdistan-Born Women chemists her article should remain, but  could also be applying here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: That's my final vote. The appropriate guideline to look to is  for notability. The subject fails eight of the nine criteria outright, and as for "winner of a national prestigious award," I'm not convinced. If they were to get a passing grade on #2, it wouldn't be above a D. I can't find a ''single'' major publication covering this. The examples given as "prestigious national awards" are ones that anyone would immediately recognize like a Guggenheim, and this isn't anywhere close. It also doesn't seem very competitive—there were a number of winners, so this seems more like a grant than anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: meets /. I would count the Arabic-language sources above as one example of SIGCOV combined, and then in English there's these: https://www.themanufacturer.com/articles/women-in-chemistry-reducing-the-uks-2-5-billion-binned-coffee-cups/ https://www.eppm.com/materials/uk-based-entrepreneur-creates-coating-negates-plastic/ https://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway/news/womans-grant-for-plastic-free-coffee-cup-innovation-200296/ http://www.kurdistan24.net/en/culture/df686c73-a3cf-44b2-9c4b-66fa623d8b5e, plus her publications https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C22&q=%22Fanya+Ismail%22&btnG= ~150 GScholar cites (by my count), https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/54515753_Fanya_Ismail 55 ResearchGate cites. None of this is overwhelming, but it gets over the line for me. I agree the article, as written, is too promotional, but that can be fixed with copyediting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: The supplied sources seem adequate to pass  and it is easy to find more such as ''https://www.themanufacturer.com/articles/women-in-chemistry-reducing-the-uks-2-5-billion-binned-coffee-cups/ Women in chemistry: Reducing the UK’s 2.5 billion binned coffee cups''.  As plastic coffee cups are quite a nuisance, this seems like quite a big deal.  Why on earth would we want to delete this when all our policies argue otherwise --- see ,  and .  The latter seems especially appropriate in this context, geddit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE||WP:NOTPAPER)