Deletion of MrSuicideSheep

Comment: Regarding the deletion of MrSuicideSheep, I can confirm that reliable source do exist. I don't know if you're well informed regarding popular EDM sites, but "Your EDM" is a relevant and reliable source within the EDM community. So is "EDM.com" and "Stereogum.com" (they're not referenced in the article, but see ). You claiming that The Georgia Straight is the only "reliable source" is ignorant.  I've also said that his number of followers ALONE did not make him notable (as I told Roscelese on her talk page), but also the fact that he is one of the most relevant and important music figures on YouTube. Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not the state of sourcing of an article, and many other sources that aren't referenced on the article do exist on the web that re-affirm his relevancy in the community. I don't understand why you think the article should be deleted, instead of improved. A simple google search can show you that this is a respectable and '''well-known''' music curator, with many '''reliable''' EDM sites as sources of information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: The number of followers a channel has or doesn't have on YouTube is completely irrelevant to our notability criteria — for Wikipedia's purposes, notability is measured entirely in terms of how much |reliable source coverage the topic does or doesn't have in ''published'' media of the ''journalistic'' variety, such as newspapers and magazines and books, ''not'' by measuring the footprint of his own |self-published web presence. Of the six footnotes here, however, three are his own |primary source content about himself, one more is a |blog that does ''nothing'' to support notability, and another one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in a listicle. The only source here that's actually getting him off the starting blocks in the notability race at all is ''The Georgia Straight'' — but that's the alt-weekly in his own hometown, so it doesn't represent ''enough'' coverage to get him to the finish line all by itself as the ''only'' substantive source in play. Even just a basic  pass requires quite a bit more than just one solid source and a bunch of weaksauce junk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:BLOGS||WP:GNG)