Deletion of Larry Nassar

Comment: Even if convicted, the subject fails to have any significant notability outside of the crime, thus meeting  and reason to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: This is the first such article I have created, and now wish I hadn't. I wish I could delete it per  but it is here at AfD. I did read  and other policies and it seemed okay. But then I had doubts, and that is why I posted at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Alleged but not convicted to get feedback. Please, accept my apologies for creating this in the first place. Please, lets close and delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G7||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: This does have a lot of coverage for the events surrounding the alleged crime. However, per  "editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed a crime, or is accused of having committed one, unless a conviction is secured." At this time, there is no conviction. If a conviction is secured, this would also likely be a  issue but we are not even there yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: In cases of doubt,  is the operative rule. There's plenty of doubt that this subject is notable. This is sensationalism. I get that the guy's in a tight spot, but there's no need to trumpet his troubles to universe and keep this for future generations to know about and poder. Give the guy some space per , we don't need to do this. And of course CRIME is operative here, as well as  and . If when the guy is ''convicted'' of anything we can maybe revisit the issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:BLPCRIME||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)