Deletion of Maisie Williams

Comment: Meets GNG, and failing an SNG is not a sufficient cause for deletion.  We don't need more biographical details to write on her: just because she's a person, doesn't mean a Wikipedia article necessarily needs all the elements of a traditional biography.  In this case, she has great coverage for one role, so per , we cover her based on how she's covered in the RS'es, which is as a well-received child actress
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per  to ''Game of Thrones (TV series)|Game of Thrones''. One role fails .  Any coverage of her at all at this point is all for her first and only role in that series, making this a . A merge and redirect sends readers to the place where she can be written of in context to that one event for which she is receiving coverage. No prejudice against the redireect being reverted and the article expanded and sourced once her career advances and she has additional significant roles in multiple notable projects and the BLP1E no longer exists
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:ENT||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as author. The third-party coverage cited in the article is sufficiently detailed (though not by much) to be the basis of a brief article;  does not require more.  is inapplicable because, as mentioned above, all actresses are public figures whose notability derives from the roles they play and the coverage these roles receive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)