Deletion of Order of battle for the Battle of Long Tan

Comment: there seems |sufficient coverage to support a stand alone order of battle article, IMO. Orders of battle are quite common in the coverage of battles (not just on Wikipedia, but in books and other mediums etc), and IMO it makes it easier for the reader to quickly determine what units took part, using a list format, without having to wade through the prose of the main battle article (which should arguably just focus on just the main formations, IMO). If the main battle article has too much detail in this regard, I'd suggest paring it back to utilise the OOB article/list to provide the detail. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: We have plenty of OrBat articles, and putting this detail in a separate article is valid under . I accept {{u|Mztourist}}'s point that Long Tan has had far too much written about it, but in Wikipedia terms that amounts to . "Uniquely notable" is not the criterion for lists; significant coverage in reliable sources is. Yes, it could be in the main article, but moving material into a subarticle is valid under . That no other Vietnam War engagement has an OrBat falls under : "The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument based solely on whether other articles do or do not exist, because there is nothing stopping anyone from creating any article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SPINOFF||WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST)