Deletion of Secure Access Technologies

Comment: Sole claim to notability based on the links given is being nominated for an SC Magazine 2014 award, which it appears hasn't been awarded yet, and |we don't predict the future. I would accept winning the award as evidence of notability but not enough on its own to keep, and besides they have not won. Reuters link seems like a press release (compare to the link to the company's own website) and the others are selfpubs and directories that aren't useful here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: primary sources and trivial mentions are not enough to pass , it is as simple as that. If proponents had spent as much time securing independent coverage as they have making spurious arguments here, this might be notable by now. Just silly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails . USER:reddogsix|reddogsix
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42)