Deletion of Jan Fran (2nd nomination)

Comment: This discussion page was created without the {{tl|afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log.  Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own on the nomination at this time.  {{ping|Austroplatypus}} If you with to nominate other articles for deletion in the future, please fully follow the procedures at .  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: meets , these three references listed in the article - https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/why-we-need-to-start-calling-out-sexual-harassment/news-story/8d9c4ed4f3e1042c7538f83ff8de566f "Why we need to start calling out sexual harassment", https://www.dailysabah.com/asia/2019/03/20/double-standards-of-western-media-outlets-criticized-after-christchurch-terror-attack "Double standards of Western media outlets criticized after Christchurch terror attack", https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/you-have-to-see-it-to-be-it-meet-three-women-who-are-changing-the-face-of-australian-tv-20170727-gxjsb9.html "'You have to see it to be it': Meet three women who are changing the face of Australian TV" are enough for notability, others ice the cake
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I think the sources in the article are more than sufficient to establish notability per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: based on references that are ''already in the article'', the subject passes . Since the article is not egregious NPOV/promotion, we should keep and tag for NPOV since deletion is not cleanup for all purposes or all problems
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)