Deletion of French Church

Comment: If you don't feel like doing the work to find the sources, what basis do you have for contesting the prod?  You shouldn't contest on the basis that sources exist unless ''you are certain that they actually do,'' and that can't be the case if you haven't bothered to do the work; indiscriminate prod removal without a scrap of investigation is nothing short of vandalism and disruptive editing. That being said, the sources proffered are trivial mentions at best; none discuss the subject in the "significant detail" that the GNG requires.  Beyond that, the nom is absolutely right: policy is clear on the fact that it is the explicit duty of editors who want to save an article to provide valid sources, not merely to speculate - absent a shred of proof - that |such sources exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)