Deletion of Rasputin's penis

Comment: as failing |verifiability. "Some claim" that he was castrated, "some claim" that someone chopped his bone apart. "No definitive evidence" regarding either, per the article. This is not "Speculateopedia."  Lacks reliable sources, so fails notability. Several of the refs are crappy and unreliable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: to main article on Rasputin. Sure, the topic meets  so we ''could'' have a stand alone article on this subject, but that doesn't me we ''should''. All of the information in this article would be better covered in the main Rasputin article. There's no need to highlight his penis in a standalone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I really think this information belongs in the article on Rasputin. The penis' notability is largely inherited from him, and most of the claims to its notability (size, shape, what he did with it) date from when it was still attached to the rest of him and to a functioning circulation. Deleting this article outright is not an option, and references to John Wayne Bobbit etc are just |WP:OTHERPENISESEXIST arguments
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: Literally every statement in this article, despite having a source, is a matter of conjecture.  "Some claim," "some believe," etc.   That a rumor is sourced does not make it anything other than a rumor.  If this article involved a current topic, it would surely be promptly deleted as lacking |verifiability.  That these rumors are historic in nature should not change anything--they are still rumors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)