Deletion of Fred 3: Camp Fred

Comment: spaced ndash}} Topic meets  per http://journalstar.com/entertainment/small-screen/television-and-radio/article_1b2497da-66a9-5eba-9f15-9e5e2e302199.html Journal Star article and http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/ae/tv-radio/what-is-that-screeching-sound-oh-its-fred-215496/?p=0 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While the so-called "comedic tastes" of the subject can certainly be called into question, the notability of said subject cannot. Numerous reliable sources have covered the film, therefore it meets . Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per meeting  and  through |sources being available for improving the article.  Sure, we have a topic contributed by an unschooled newcomer, and the thing http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_3:_Camp_Fred&diff=prev&oldid=506125642 as nominated is a |glaring mass of plot and contained no sources. So what?  When  finds that sources ARE available, we fix such article... not delete them through retaliation at what a newcomer contributed elsewhere.  We do not delete because something is a ''possible'' target of probematic edits. We can |watch.  We can |protect.  We can |improve such ourselves and show through example that it CAN be done. As shown above... one such sets of repeatedly removed edits in a related article were ultimately sourced. |regular editing is far preferred over a |battling over addressable issues. '''Note:''' it took only took about two minutes to begin adding sources.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_3%3A_Camp_Fred&diff=506313754&oldid=506308783  What we need now is the use of more of the available sources,http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Fred+3%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&gs_nf=1&ds=n&pq=%22fred%203%22&cp=20&gs_id=10&xhr=t&q=%22Fred%203%22%2C%20cruikshank&pf=p&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&oq=%22Fred+3%22,+cruikshank&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=25c85992bed88120&biw=983&bih=591http://www.google.com/#hl=en&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=GbMhUKmVMOeY2wXY9YDABg&ved=0CC0QBSgA&q=%22Camp+Fred%22+movie&spell=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=25c85992bed88120&biw=983&bih=591 and someone (maybe even me) to trim the living daylights out of the newcomer's overlong plot section. Addressable issues rarely require deletion, and AFD is not for forcing cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NRVE||WP:UGLY||WP:BEFORE||WP:WATCH||WP:PROTECT||WP:SOFIXIT||WP:ATD||WP:BATTLE)