Deletion of Judaism and bus stops

Comment: the presentation of information in its current form is very 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: per : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AJudaism_and_bus_stops&action=historysubmit&diff=389093727&oldid=389093328
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: because it is a meaningless intersection of topics.  This violates |SYNTH by its very existence because it implies that there is something special about these two topics in relation to each other.  I suspect this has something to do with the dispute on the Judaism and violence page, though I tagged this with PROD on its own merits, as part of my regular new page patrolling, without looking at the debate on the other page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: this article is so  i Almost  accidently got stabbed just reading it. that being Said I almost want move it into user space and put a link at  and  to give an example of such articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY||WP:SPIDER||WP:POINT)

Comment: The topic "Judaism and bus stops" did not receive significant coverage in reliable sources. Doesn't meet , . As a Joke it is quite funny though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Since this AfD started, it's become evident that this article and AfD have ignited a drawn out struggle that's beginning to violate  and even , starting with the creation of Judaism and bus stops, and then this AfD{{clarify}}, and then Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace and violence in Judaism and a follow-up AfD guaranteed to arouse controversy at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaism and violence. Right now the situation seems to be one of people getting carried away with  and  because of what's going on, and it's time to stop this vicious cycle and go on with rational mature editorial behavior. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:WAR||WP:POINT||WP:REICHSTAG)

Comment: silly  article, which stops being funny when you realise it's exactly the kind of thing that attracts ridicule to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: The article lede reminds me of a New York Times article on Jews and elevators http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/nyregion/10elevator.html Another Landlord Worry: Is the Elevator Kosher - which gives some credibility to  on an overall topic and suggests that the above delete arguments based on SYNTH, OR, INDISCIMINATE are simply not valid.  Indeed, many of the delete votes are DONTLIKEIT
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: very reluctantly, because '''Judaism''' does '''not''' have opinions per se about bus stops. This article seems to have clear problems of a  nature. This topic was not well thought out and it smacks of pettiness and sounds almost silly, which is why so many users seem to be upset about it and rightly so. Writing essays about Judaism and fire hydrants or Judaism and sidewalks would be equally trivial. On the other hand, Driving on Shabbat in Jewish law, that cites Jewish law and is an important subject in Shabbat observance, is a better example of how to go about things, while Judaism and violence speaks for itself as a ''very'' serious topic. The time is not ripe for Jewish trivia of this sort on WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: There seems to be a point being made comparing this article to the Judaism and violence article, but if this article was made to argue that "both should be deleted or neither should be deleted, these two are essentially parallels!", we have a  violation. A plausible case ''can'' be made for the Judaism and violence article, because violence is not "loosely associated" from Jewish history, European history is all too replete with horrific violent atrocities committed against Jewish people culminating in the madness of WW2. Further, the teachings of what is justifiable violence and not has discussed in religious and ethical contexts for many religions and viewpoints, including Judaism. However, I can see nothing, nothing at all, which establishes a connection between the topics "Judaism" and "bus stops" beyond the trivial fact that buses are used by Jews. None the "sources" establish anything else than trivial connections like that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Hard to imagine that would clear 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE)

Comment: This is a very clear example of , knock it off
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: The subject title just drew me in and encouraged me to read on, but it is a bit |pointy.  And there appears to be a lack of references linking Judaism and bus stops
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: WP:SYNTH is in play here, as well as : I can't find evidence that the confluence of Judaism as it relates to Bus Stops is notable. No objection to userfication, if that's the consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Granted, an amusing way to make a , but a  nonetheless. And if not a , certainly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per ,  and . Yes, there is Judaism, and yes, there are bus stops, but to title the two together and write a whole article about how the two intersect is ludicrous. Each of the points (prohibition against taking the bus on Shabbat, indecent advertisements at bus stops in religious neighborhoods, tzedaka|charity boxes at bus stops in Israel, overcrowding at the bus stop by the Western Wall, grave desecrations, and rabbi stories) can be adequately covered on their respective topic pages, and the creators of this page have already provided the references. There is no need to group everything under a ridiculous heading like "Judaism and bus stops". The casual reader might even think we're starting up another attack on this battle-scarred religion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: as this article contravenes #ESSAY, regardless of sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)