Deletion of Andreas Raab (2nd nomination)

Comment: The stub article for programmer Ian Bell was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ian_Bell_(programmer)&oldid=335986779 in this state when it survived its https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ian_Bell_(programmer) AfD discussion in 2010. As you can see, a passing mention in a broadsheet, and a magazine that carried 5 paragraphs of a talk by the programmer (certainly a primary source) might not have passed |general notability guidelines, but the consensus was to keep (though consensus can change.) I think that a year or two's work on an influential game is as valuable as 10 to 15 years work on influential open source research. I think the of flexibility with the rules that was shown with the Bell bio might be in order here. While the Raab interview was published on the Squeak wiki, and we don't as a rule consider wikis to be reliable, there is no dispute about the authenticity of the interview
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Okay, one final remark.  {{u|LaMona}} is absolutely correct re: our  guidelines, which also apply to the recently deceased, {{tq|Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources.}}  From further down the page at SPS, {{tq|Never use self-published sources – including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets – as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject}}.  As LaMona points out, even if the article is kept, most the content would have to go anyway
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLPSPS)