Deletion of Flag of South Azerbaijan

Comment: or '''selectively merge''' to article(s), if any, about the movement(s) associated with these flags, such as Southern Azerbaijan National Awakening Movement.The majority of opinions above, on both sides, use |arguments to avoid in AfDs or arguments that are irrelevant for the purpose of this discussion, such as whether or not a state or territory called "South Azerbaijan" exists or ought to exist. The policy-based problem with this article is the lack of substantial coverage about the flag(s) it describes, causing the topic to fail #Notability and . We would first need a decent article about the secessionist movement (if any) itself before we can consider writing a separate article about its flag(s
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:V||WP:GNG)

Comment: False and misleading material; there is no such land or flag by that name and has never been in the entire History. These flags similar to other advertising sketches risen from designer’s fantasy, non-existent in real world. The sources are not reliable; Blogs , UNPO, etc. do not meet the requirement of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: the existaince of the ''country'' is not an issue here one way or another. The existiance of the ''flag'' is. No  that it can be verified as existing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I ask an admin to checks the users if they are suitable for tagging as Wikipedia:Single-purpose account and to avoid  . Isn't it strange that so many votes have no text ? No opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a place for advertizing (). Just look at the following gallery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTADVERTISING)

Comment: South Azerbaijan" itself is an irredentist fringe theory, basically a fantasy concept. No state of official entity by that name exists or has ever existed. Such Wikipedia articles should deal with real states or former states, not fantasies and myths. Therefore, this article is basically a product of nationalist ing, which cites a bunch of blogs, and unreliable non-academic sources, violating  and . Notable Azeri scholar Shireen T. Hunter, of Georgetown University, address this issue in "Iran and Transcuacsia in the Post-Soviet Era", writing in page 106 that "After the Ottoman empire had collapsed, both the Communists and, later, the Azerbaijani nationalists developed the myth of one Azerbaijan divided into a southern and northern part, comparing it to what happened to the two Germanics and to Korea, and using this myth to justify irredentist claims toward Iranian territory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:RS||WP:OR)