Deletion of The Gunnerment

Comment: as an unsourced |neologism. I agree with the POV concerns commented on above; this definitely looks to be an attempt to use this as a point-of-view piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: I am Tasmanian, follow the Tasmanian media, including the comments on the Mercury website, and have never once heard the term "Gunnerment".  I have heard "Gunnsmania" used but even that is not notable enough for an article.  "Gunnerment" is a neologism and {{User|Gunnerment}} is just using Wikipedia to make it popular in order to push his/her political agenda.  I suggest {{User:Gunnerment}} reads |Wikipedia's neutralily and |Conflict of interest policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:COI)