Deletion of David Dineen-Porter (2nd nomination)

Comment: The test of significant coverage doesn't call for a web harvest to find anything at all that mentions a subject. The sources must be |reliable. I see very few sources that would pass the test of reliability (I hardly think Eye Weekly crosses the reliability standard of "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy), and what's left is arguably not significant coverage. This is an important point and is not nit-picking. As a tertiary source, wikipedia essentially delegates its fact-checking and accuracy to secondary sources. We must therefore only use sources that are reliable, especially with BLPs. I don't see them here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)