Deletion of Cousin relationships between British monarchs and consorts (2nd nomination)

Comment: My impression is that a list of couples who are very closely related may be notable, but including people whose relationship is more distant seems OR. Further, this article basically comes down to adding how closely related a monarch and consort is to the lists at Monarchs of the British Isles. Such an addition seems a bit . In the previous AfD, one argument is that endogamy in the British monarchy is notable. I agree that it is, but as an article with notable examples discussed and not as a list with no context
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: This article's subject could be seen as notable, but the article as it stands looks like it could be partly based on original research and I share the concern that it is tending towards . I think something could be written on this, with proper sources that make clear that specific royal marriages to relatives were notable (William III and Mary II is an obvious one) and that there is a notable trend, but I think the list format here is not really suitable for Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)