Deletion of Vivian Reddy

Comment: and clean up. Significant coverage by secondary sources. (''Mail & Guardian'', ''The Witness (South African newspaper)|The Witness'', ''Independent News & Media|The Independent'') Most of the coverage isn't flattering, but it does demonstrate that the subject is notable. The subject does meet the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Successful businessperson and philanthropist, but does not meet . The only independent source in the article appears to be http://www.armsdeal-vpo.co.za/articles04/reddy_connection.html this one; all the others are links to his website. I don't know about the other awards, but the inclusion of the "Rotary International Paul Harris Award" gives the list a strong smell of resumé padding; this "award" is basically purchased by the recipient, or his club, by making a specified donation to the Rotary International Foundation. IMO the problem is not with the way the article is written; it is with the notability of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I can't see where this falls short of the . There is coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)