Deletion of Miracles of Life

Comment: multiple reviews give it 's and satisfy  & . But a book is not notable ''just'' because of whom it was written by as some may suggest. That would be ''inherited notability''. WP does not recognise that. (PS.  only allows it to disreguard the above if it "is a subject of common classroom study", which is never stated or proven
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOTE||WP:BK)

Comment: Where to begin! 5 reviews in the biggest British broadsheets means this topic meets  by a landslide. The author is so notable that all his works would be notable even without secondary sources. It is inexplicable that the nominator would have nominated this article for deletion had thy any idea who Ballard is. I recommend a swift face-saving withdrawal of the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)