Deletion of Daniel LaPlante

Comment: The murderer is noted in a couple books about "killer kids" (i.e. https://books.google.com/books?id=2qXaAAAAMAAJ&q=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&dq=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjTiJOm_rHJAhVFK4gKHdWbCjEQ6AEIHDAAhttps://books.google.com/books?id=jwD0o7rT-LYC&q=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&dq=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjTiJOm_rHJAhVFK4gKHdWbCjEQ6AEIQzAH) and the murders are noted in a few others (e.g.https://books.google.com/books?id=xJPaAAAAMAAJ&q=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&dq=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjTiJOm_rHJAhVFK4gKHdWbCjEQ6AEIMzAEhttps://books.google.com/books?id=PEhPAQAAIAAJ&q=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&dq=murders+Gustafson+LaPlante&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjTiJOm_rHJAhVFK4gKHdWbCjEQ6AEIOTAF). With those mentions, an argument could be made that this squeezes by  or the various subsections of . I have no objections to renaming as Gustafson family murders
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:EVENT)

Comment: He doesn't have to meet , which like all the specialized sections under , offers ''supplemental'' means of demonstrating notability for people who don't meet the basic guidelines under  or . But they can also meet the basic guidelines, yet not the supplemental ones, and still qualify
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIMINAL||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)