Deletion of Miniscule of Sound

Comment: The big problem with this is that it all boils down to coverage- which just isn't out there. I've also found where there are thousands upon thousands of entries for Guinness records. There are at least http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/set-a-record/faq/ 40,000 records in the GBoWR database, meaning that setting a record isn't really something that would give absolute notability. As far as previous AfDs have gone, we only tend to keep articles if the subject has received a lot of coverage and/or set a LOT of other records in other capacities that would count towards notability. Holding a GBoWR doesn't really hold the notability it used to, especially since they started charging money to help people come up with ideas to set records. (You still have to try to set the record, but that they'll come up with something within your capacity means that it's not exactly overly difficult or strenuous to set a record as it used to be.) As far as it showing in various places, the thing about that is that it has to be the main or one of the biggest main focal points of the exhibition or at least have tons of in-depth coverage about it showing at various places. There are trivial mentions, but nothing in-depth. As far as , the existence of other articles or even copycat booths does not really mean much because ultimately the existence of other articles doesn't have any weight on this article and copycats really only count towards notability if you can show a lot of coverage in RS that has the people saying that they were copying the MoS. The long and short of this is that there just isn't any coverage out there. There are brief trivial references and routine notifications of events, but the only actual in-depth source we have is one news article from the area it originally opened in. That's really, really not enough to show an absolute keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)