Deletion of Tenther movement

Comment: http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/10/tenth.amendment.movement/index.html seems like a reasonable source. I'm not really convinced that this is anything more than a |neologism that's been applied to an existing group for whatever reason rather than a novel political movement. Maybe a |merge or refocussing of the article would be possible - although I don't know where. The minimum number of sources required for a topic is generally the minimum that will allow a high quality, |neutral, |verifiable encyclopaedia article free of |original research to be written. If that can't be done then it shouldn't matter if a Google search gives two results or two million
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:MERGE||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:OR)