Deletion of SS-Oberabschnitt Weichsel

Comment: lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILUNIT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per lack of proper sourcing establishing notability. The single source cited in the article is not reliable (as pointed out above), and since it was added by OberRanks, we have every reason to expect that even that bad source won't actually support the contents claimed in the article. Has anybody checked? Personally, I'm not touching Yerger with a ten-foot pole. As for , that essay makes the very wise point that "presumption of notability for a military unit or formation depends wholly on the existence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources" and that the specific types of units listed further down are merely "likely, but not certain, to have such coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILUNIT)

Comment: Clearly meets the criteria of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILUNIT)