Deletion of Gimme Head: the Tale of the Cuyahoga Valley Bigfoot

Comment: meets  and . First, to avoid any possible confusion, let me state unequivocally that I am the author of article subject to deletion and that I am also the writer, producer and director of the film.  This should be apparent in the comments that follow, but if not, it should be clear now.  If anyone wants to object for that reason, I will make appropriate revisions to this comment.  Now, since an issue of notability has been raised, I added a feature article from The Akron Beacon Journal, which is Akron, Ohio's major newspaper.  Akron, Ohio, is a major city and cultural center in the United States, and has given the world may great actors, film directors and musicians. See wikipedia entry: List of people from Akron, Ohio.  Moreover, it screened at Nightlight Cinema, Akron’s premiere art cinema house, and is scheduled to screen at Cleveland Comic Con, Cleveland, Ohio in October.  Beyond that, however, the film is represented on both IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes, and appropriate links were given to each.  Both are encyclopedic sources for information on films created worldwide.  Six other links (not including The Beacon Journal, above) were posted in the original article, all from non-related film critics from the United States and Canada over whom I have no authority or control.  Following the link to each of those sources will show sustained and ongoing engagement in the business of film reviewing, and not a one-off review for this particular film.  Blogs and websites, particularly in the area of pop culture and film, are now part of the media culture we live in, and shouldn’t be dismissed as niche when they show an serious and continuous pursuit of the topic to which they are devoted.  The suggestion has been made, however, that the film could be moved to Help:Userspace draft or retrieved under Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.  Both actions create their own issues and a better course of action may be possible, as in the following example.   Made in Cleveland is another movie made in Cleveland that seems to have similar issues related to references and notability. Looking at the references to the film, there are two solid newspaper references, at least two dead links, two links that lead tho the Wayback Machine (webarchive) with less than perfect results, and nothing more current than 2012-2013.  This isn't to criticize Made in Cleveland, a fine and notable film, but to suggest that that film has been given the opportunity to replace and supplement its references and make a stronger wikipedia entry, including the later addition of links from other wikipedia pages.  Gimme Head: the Tale of the Cuyahoga Valley Bigfoot is less than one-year old and has already received notice from the United States, Canada, and even the UK (review in "Slaughtered Bird").  More reviews and screenings are currently in process.  So rather than taking the rash action of deletion, would it not be better to keep the same type of "Multiple Issues" flag as appears on Made in Cleveland, and periodically review for additions that make a better wikipedia entry for the film
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMOVIE)

Comment: With the exception of the Beacon Journal, '''all''' of the reviewers appear to be blogs and blogs are implicitly |non-reliable IMDb has been rejected as a reliable source because it's user maintained and virtually unedited. Rotten Tomatoes does have a listing, but the "tomatometer" is unavailable (although it's available for other works); I think this means that no reviewer recognized by the site has reviewed the film; there are also no viewer comments. The movie is shorter than the average TV episode
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Or Draftify as mentioned by others this fails . While I understand everything {{user|Salander44}} is trying to say, I think it’s best that it is moved back to their draft so if more relevant references do get published it can be assessed again later. As for comparing it to other films that are on Wikipedia, all that shows is that they should probably be nominated for deletion too rather than helping their cause for this article to be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMOVIE)

Comment: for now '''Userfy'''. As it is beginning to get some coverage and review outside of blogs, but not enough yet in  to satisfy . I gave the thing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gimme_Head%3A_the_Tale_of_the_Cuyahoga_Valley_Bigfoot&type=revision&diff=790890599&oldid=790825460 some tweaks for style and tone, and nice as the in-depth article in http://www.ohio.com/entertainment/movies/akroncentric-bigfoot-flick-stomps-into-nightlight-cinema-on-new-year-s-eve-1.736519 ''Akron Beacon Journal'' is,  needs more. I suggest it be userfied for now back to brand new and inexperienced contributor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NF)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMOVIE)