Deletion of Andreja Gomboc

Comment: Per #7 for .  Time should be given to expand and improve upon the article given these issues pointed out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: in the absence of evidence of passing any of the criteria of . We've seen criteria #2 and #7 discussed in this AfD, but the only clear published evidence of that that I can see is the "Prometheus of Science" award, and she is only the recipient of 1/8 of 1/8 of 1/4 of the award (there are four categories, eight winning entries in her category, and eight co-recipients for her entry). This seems a bit too slim for my taste, and the other  criteria seem even farther out of reach
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Looking back at past decisions on these academic AfD pages I find that to satisfy rof #1, 500-1000 citations in the scientific literature have usually been needed with an h index of greater than 15. With only 45 cites and an h index of 3 from GS the present subject comes nowhere near these figures and does not satisfy any other the other categories of rof
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P)

Comment: As at least per 3rd item of criteria in  she is among others a member of the European Astronomical Society and International Astronomical Union. Then she is an active researcher in the field of astrophysics, high energy physics, relativity and the Gaia mission
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: No evidence of notability, unsourced BLP, appears to fail . Article may be keepable if evidence of notability is found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)