Deletion of Janine Krieber

Comment: I agree with JPL (for once): spouses of party leaders are not ''automatically'' notable. They can become notable, however, by having enough in-depth coverage devoted specifically to them rather than to their being the spouse of someone else. And finding that coverage can be made more difficult by all the non-notable coverage about being a spouse. But in this case, I think she passes, with sources like http://www.cpac.ca/en/programs/tete-a-tete/episodes/14628412 (national-level long-form TV interview), http://www.thewhig.com/2009/09/24/prof-an-expert-in-politics (local but in-depth, mentioning her husband only in passing), http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/dion-s-wife-offers-scathing-facebook-view-of-ignatieff-1.787091 (national, one of several pieces in multiple media sources about something she wrote), http://www.mcgilltribune.com/opinion/focus-on-the-women-not-the-family/ (passing coverage of a panel she participated on, but doesn't even mention her husband when describing who she is), http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/actualites-en-societe/447189/la-radicalisation-ne-mene-pas-necessairement-au-terrorisme (in French, looks to be more in-depth on some of Krieber's views; she's extensively quoted; again, Dion not mentioned). Not to mention tons of coverage explaining who she is in the context of being Dion's wife (http://thesheaf.com/2008/10/02/janine-krieber-flushes-red-with-liberal-passion/ for example) – if that were the only coverage we would have BIO1E issues but it's not, so it counts. I think she passes , even though she appears not to pass  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:PROF)

Comment: While I do not think she passes , I do think she meets the more general 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)