Deletion of Alexis Vanier

Comment: Subject may or may not meet , but that is only meant as a rule of thumb, not as a formal policy and does not supersede the requirements of the general notability guidelines: if no appropriate sources can be ''shown'' to exist (and I, too, have looked and do not see any) then deletion is an appropriate move.  I would also politely ask Dolovis, who has written nearly 6,000 stub articles like this one, to please consider what purpose such articles are serving in the Wikipedia project other than to allow an editor be able to claim having written more than 6,000 articles.  Your lukewarm and so far inadequate defense (per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)

Comment: Nomination fails . While this high second round draft pick falls just short of the criteria of NHOCKEY,  the subject does however pass  as evidenced by the many independent and reliable sources within the article, and the many more reliable sources which can be easily found on-line
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)