Deletion of God Nose

Comment: clearly notable. It would be rather strange if the first underground comic had been published by DC Comics in 100,000 copies. It was, by the way, reprinted at least four times later on... This book clearly meets the "essence" of , specifically points 1 (sources) and 3, "The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement."; being the first underground comic is quite a "significant contribution", and it is considered as such by sources like Heritage Auctionshttp://comics.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=826&lotNo=42140, where it sold for a quite impressive $6K, or http://books.google.be/books?id=X1QGu16o0OoC&pg=PA206&lpg=PA206&dq=%22god+nose%22+jackson&source=bl&ots=FPx4ZE4Vbj&sig=SyJyx7roTFXc8w7eTkID95ZjwU4&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=ZSbsT5iTFpHn-gbc57HYBQ&ved=0CFMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22god%20nose%22%20jackson&f=false this 2010 book, "Graven Images: Religion in Comic Books and Graphic Novels" which gives it a lot of attention. It also gets a long paragraph http://books.google.be/books?id=dTN54Zv0Ip4C&pg=PA54&dq=%22god+nose%22+jackson&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=WSfsT8LuLceF-waahf3zBg&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22god%20nose%22%20jackson&f=false here, and further attention http://books.google.be/books?id=tn9QAAAAMAAJ&q=%22god+nose%22+jackson&dq=%22god+nose%22+jackson&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=WSfsT8LuLceF-waahf3zBg&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAw here, http://books.google.be/books?id=vAH24kOdCq8C&pg=PA204&dq=%22god+nose%22+jaxon&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=2SfsT4eeKc-h-Qbo9am-BQ&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%22god%20nose%22%20jaxon&f=false here, http://books.google.be/books?id=K2J7DpUItEMC&pg=PA649&dq=%22god+nose%22+jaxon&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=2SfsT4eeKc-h-Qbo9am-BQ&ved=0CGUQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22god%20nose%22%20jaxon&f=false here and http://books.google.be/books?id=hQb_q6DWle4C&pg=PA167&dq=%22god+nose%22+jaxon&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=2SfsT4eeKc-h-Qbo9am-BQ&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22god%20nose%22%20jaxon&f=false here. Need I go on? Clearly a notable comic, no problem to meet  at all. A merge to the author may be appropriate, but deletion is extreme overkill
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:BK)

Comment: Non-notable comic book per the essence of . I had redirected it to the authors' page but the creator of this article reverted my edit. From the article: "A total of 1,000 copies were printed on a Xerox machine at the State Capital print shop after hours
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: I think Fram has demonstrated that the article does meet the  notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)