Deletion of Chi Hsuin Urlic Chu

Comment: Unfortunately, Ray is correct. There are no  which is what is needed to support the notability of the subject. This is too bad as the subejct is interesting, just needs to be cited. Maybe there is something in print that we do not have access to that can be cited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Um. I can confirm he exists, and after contorting (searching under author:"CU Chu" on Gscholar) I can get a single uncited hit - his career was early enough that Gscholar may not have the citations properly indexed. I think this is a case of failing  in the classic sense - there simply isn't enough coverage in RS independent of the subject to write a decent article about him. This is a shame, because people with the length and prominence of the career presented in the article today would have enough sourcing and citations and the like to pass , but due to the older era the subject hails from, we don't have enough. If the original author wishes, '''userfication''' would be a good idea - eventually, the indexers will work through the digitization of older source materials
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)