Deletion of Information and communication technologies for development

Comment: Essay (or essays), incomprehensible, dreadfully long. Perhaps an online class project per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=928452493#Information_and_communication_technologies_for_development-_Extremely_large_(100+)_amount_of_spas. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: saw the ANI discussion, very bad article for Wikipedia. Hardly something that can really been written about and a big |TNT case anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: perhaps redirect to Information_and_communications_technology#Developing_countries until a proper article can be developed. ICT4D, with books and hundreds of papers devoted to the topic, is undoubtedly a notable topic and there is sufficient secondary sourcing with which to develop an article. Unfortunately, the current article is full of synthesis and is long enough that reworking it seems unworkable, short of starting over. I don't like recommending deletion based on , but this is a poster child for such an approach. No prejudice to re-creation as a proper article. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: As the editor who discovered the page and started the ani on it, the history is comprised of 100s of students submitting what appear to be vaguely related essays into this article, slowly bloating it over the decades. It's now '''400,000+''' bites and the 56th largest article, and consists of unscalable walls of text. The topic, whatever it is, seems to be notable, but the article is too messy to even figure what it's even talking about. Although I'm not fond of it as an argument, |TNT seems to be the only option here. I'll ad that a steward may be needed for the deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)