Deletion of Eunice Sanborn

Comment: I see nothing in  that says people 110 and older are einherently notable and must be given a directory-type article. Please point out what you are citing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: unless more non-trivial |reliable sources can be found. A blog and one local news story is not sufficient. Would be willing to change my !vote if more sources can be found. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: One of the few times in Wikipedia that the only thing you have to do to become |notable is to live long enough.   Eunice Sanborn|Ms. Sanborn qualifies under Supercentenarian|supercentenarians.   I was able to find the following reference that is from a 3rd party – independent – verifiable – creditable source. http://www.jacksonvilleprogress.com/local/local_story_205180931.html.  I’ll in-line cite it in the article.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (Wikipedia:Notability)

Comment: to Oldest people where she is already on the list of "Ten oldest people" and can remain on the list of "Oldest people since 1955" after she goes to her reward. Fails , where the event is "staying alive." The well-documented very oldest people are collectively encyclopedic, expressing examples of the extremes within the human species, but if all they are known for is being alive for a long time, they do not need individual directory-type articles, since Wikipedia is |not a directory. Her biography is apparently, other than the continued living, no different than if she had passed at age 90
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT)