Deletion of Tarana-e-Milli

Comment: Weak Delete''' per the comments of the editor with an unreadable signature starting with "D" as well as the comments of Vibhijain. Not every writing that exists is notable enough for a stand-alone article. See Wikipedia:Notability (books) Perhaps, based on his bio article, the case could be made that the author "so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable." It is hard to be sure he is the major literary figure that his Wikipedia bio article states, since it sounds a bit biased. Per his bio, he wrote tens of thousands of "verses," and I am reluctant to allow every thing he authored automatic notability for standalone articles knowing only what the Wikipedia bio says. Another issue is that unless there are reliable sources for the meaning and reception of each such work, the article would only be a reprint of the original work and |original research or opinions of the Wikipedia editor writing the article. Is this particular work taught in schools? Has it been the subject of criticism and analysis by independent and reliable sources? Has it won awards? Give us some basis for notability beyond hand-waving reference to unspecified things at "Google Book." The burden is indeed on those seeking to show that something is notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The poem certainly satisfies  per following sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: historical anthem that is definitely notable and much covered in text books and other sources. Just because sources are not present in the ''article'' is not enough to call the works of such notable authors as non-notable. The links at the top of this very AFD give a lot of sources to establish notability https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Tarana-e-Milli%22 https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tarana-e-Milli%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1. The article should be tagged as unsourced and improved instead of being deleted. Remember that articles with subjects that are ''not'' notable should be deleted, not those that have a bulk load of sources and just not referenced yet, that's a clean up task per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE)