Deletion of Christopher Kimball's Milk Street

Comment: Plenty of sources that discuss the subject in detail. Easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)

Comment: Most of the references are promotional and rely extensively on interviews with Kimball with no original or intellectually independent content/option/analysis and therefore fails  and/or . While Kimball appears notable, notability is not inherited. There is also confusion over the name of the organization - it appears to be "CPK Media" and it is not clear that the organization named in this topic and "CPK Media" (the company being sued) are the same thing. Also, illegal conduct is excluded for the purposes of establishing notability as per . So we're left with a bunch of PR releases and interviews with Kimball - which also fail  and/or . There's a difference between sources that can be used to establish notability and the lower standard of sources that can be used as citations to support facts within an article, and not one of the sources here meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails  and GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:ILLCON||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)