Deletion of Veracity of statements by Donald Trump

Comment: This seems an awful lot like a . For example, {{tq|Tony Schwartz (author)|Tony Schwartz is a journalist who ghostwriter|ghostwrote ''Trump: The Art of the Deal''.{{cite news |last=Mayer |first=Jane |authorlink=Jane Mayer |date=July 25, 2016 |url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/07/25/donald-trumps-ghostwriter-tells-all |title=Donald Trump's Ghostwriter Tells All |website=The New Yorker |accessdate=February 10, 2017}}{{cite book |last=Barrett |first=Wayne |authorlink=Wayne Barrett |title=The Greatest Show on Earth |publisher=Regan Arts. |location=New York, N.Y. |isbn=978-1682450-79-6 |page=33 |edition=First Regan Arts. paperback edition, August 2016}} (Republication of ''Trump: The Deals and the Downfall'' (Harper Collins, 1992, {{ISBN|0-06-016704-1}})) In July 2016, Schwartz was interviewed by Jane Mayer for two articles in ''The New Yorker''.{{cite news |last=Mayer |first=Jane |authorlink=Jane Mayer |date=July 20, 2016 |title=Donald Trump Threatens the Ghostwriter of "The Art of the Deal" |website=The New Yorker |url=http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/donald-trump-threatens-the-ghostwriter-of-the-art-of-the-deal |accessdate=February 10, 2017}} In them he described Trump, who was running for president at the time, highly unfavorably, and described how he came to regret writing ''The Art of the Deal''.{{cite news |date=July 21, 2016 |url=https://www.npr.org/2016/07/21/486924253/art-of-the-deal-ghostwriter-on-why-trump-should-not-be-president |title='Art Of The Deal' Ghostwriter On Why Trump Should Not Be President |publisher=NPR |accessdate=February 10, 2017}}}} Is it really necessary to tell us how Shwartz feels about Trump? This quote is half the section labeled Special:Diff/887368522#In_The_Art_of_the_Deal|In ''The Art of the Deal''. If the results are to be keep, I highly suggest we place some sort of cleanup tag on it. It's |sourced, yes, but the tone needs work. &#8211
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:RS)

Comment: The (lack of) veracity of statements by Donald Trump is a notable topic in itself with many reliable sources noting that the amount of untruthful statements are unparalleled. If reliable sources treat the very fact that a president habitually makes false statements as a notable topic itself (and not just as something all politicians do), similar articles can be created for these presidents. If the problem is the name, it can be discussed on the talk page. But if your only argument is |no other such page exists, it's a weak one. After all, just because something is unique does not mean it's not a notable topic. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: LOL! I hate to mention the editor, and not just the content, but we're looking at a case of severe ompetence|incompetence on display, or just plain POV deletionism. This is a frivolous AfD. We document what RS say here, and since they document (not just "allege) "that Donald Trump is the biggest liar in history" (Rusf10), we are supposed to document what they say. If Rusf10 doesn't get that, they should be topic banned from American politics, because they consistently take the side opposite RS on all things Trump. That's disruptive and incompetent. Check their history and you'll see
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Drowning in  refs. Perfect topic to showcase how WP:PAG produces encyclopedic content in contested areas. Any issues regarding content (e.g. POV), can be solved within the article/talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: very relevant and notable topic. Just because it contains information you don't like doesn't mean it meets the |attack page criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G10)