Deletion of Kwame Adu-Mante

Comment: the subject lacks the necessary amount of significant, independent coverage about them to meet  or ; every source cited by the article is either not in-depth enough or , and the subject does not inherit undue amounts of notability from companies he is affiliated with. A search for more quality sources online does not assuage these concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: I don't know what the nom means when they wrote "struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources..." Considering the fact that most of the sources cited are reliable African sources with in-depth coverage of the subject, I would say their  and understanding of RS is pretty bad. Many of those sources cited in the article are RS news agencies that covers Africa - especially his country. Also, just because there is no article on his organisation does not mean he is not notable. Maybe the guy is notable but the organisation is not. Maybe both are notable bur one has not bothered to created an article for the organisation yet. Notability or lack of is not inherited. That is a silly argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)