Deletion of Copy (written)

Comment: Reads like what I'd expect to find in a dictionary, except perhaps a bit more detailed. If it's in fact a stub, then the theory is that it could later be expanded into a proper encyclopaedia article. But it's hard for mew to imagine what that article might be like, other than an -filled essay on the technique of copy-writing. What else is there to say about it? And why hasn't someone said it, these 14 years? —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This is not a dictionary definition; it's a stub – see , which explains the difference.  The topic is notable and so can readily be expanded from sources such as ''Translation of Thought to Written Text While Composing''; ''Broadcast News Writing, Reporting, and Producing''; ''How Advertising is Written--and Why''; ''On the Art of Writing Copy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)