Deletion of Daniel Halpin

Comment: the nomination's claim that he is only notable for one event is incorrect as evidenced by substantial coverage http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8249419.stm from the BBC in 2009 (already included). londonist.com also covered him several times http://londonist.com/2005/06/return_of_the_t https://londonist.com/2009/03/tox09for_sale https://londonist.com/2006/03/tox_spotting including in 2006 calling him "the capital’s most infamous tagger" and http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/jan/20/ukcrime.prisonsandprobation in passing ''The Guardian'' in 2007 said he was described as "the tube's most prolific tagger". Admittedly with only these sources notability is a bit shaky still, but with his arrest in 2011 receiving such widespread coverage  is met. It's tricky to argue over NARTIST when his work was classified as vandalism, but it's also worth nothing that Banksy (the most famous artist of the graffiti movement) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2007860/Banksy-uses-tag-jailed-graffiti-artist-Tox--Daniel-Halpin--latest-artwork-appears-London-street.html produced a piece including his tag. At the time of his conviction ''The Guardian'' also noted that he was branded "king of taggers" by a graffiti magazine and there may be other offline sources available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I don't think the  rationale used by the nominator is sustainable at this point. I believe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)