Deletion of Scanner Access Now Easy

Comment: The Linux Magazine and Linux Journal articles pointed out by Dmitrij are independent and in depth; the Linux Bible source has about a page on SANE and contributes. These are enough for a marginal notability per . The article itself could use more secondary sources, but this is a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion. A marginally notable topic and and an article with no insurmountable problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are similar articles on TWAIN, Windows Image Acquisition and Image and Scanner Interface Specification, comparable APIs for other platforms.  Several of the references are to project pages for software that implements SANE, which seem like secondary sources to me.  A quick check on google turned up a set of slides by Petter Reinholdtsen - perhaps not the be-all-and-end-all of  but I think, taken with the rest, enough to establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Two weeks late for this kind of nominations. Quick glance at "books" and "scholar" search reveals quite a lot of sources. (And in this particular case I feel myself excused from , as sources are really numerous, subject is obviously notable and I have no interest in writing this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LOTSOFSOURCES)