Deletion of Invite Jesus Into Your Life (Vol1)

Comment: the number of Ghits can be faked; see Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Google_test.  In this case, I don't see |any significant coverage in reliable sources. There are literally https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Invite+Jesus+Into+Your+Life+%28Vol1%29%22&tbm=nws#q=Invite+Jesus+Into+Your+Life&tbm=bks Thousands of other books on the same subject, few of which are notable as we count it at . If we are wrong, please correct us
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:NBOOKS)

Comment: I can't find anything to show that this book ultimately passes |notability guidelines for books. It exists, but as |existing is not notability that fact means very little here on Wikipedia. As far as the links given above, http://searchcelebrities.com/celebrity-news/christian-singer-and-author-of-the-book-of-invite-jesus-into-your-life-werley-nortreus-is-saving-thousands-and-thousands-of-souls-worldwide-for-jesus-christ-learn-more-about-his-ministry-and-how-his/ Search Celebrities is not considered to be a reliable source for several reasons, one of which is that they accept payment from various people who pay for more coverage on their site. This author doesn't seem to be one of those people, but even so this fact makes the site unusable. http://gospelartistspeoplenews.com/2014/09/15/christian-singer-and-author-of-the-book-of-invite-jesus-into-your-life-werley-nortreus-is-saving-thousands-and-thousands-of-souls-worldwide-for-jesus-christ-learn-more-about-his-ministry-and-how-his/ Ceraphin News Magazine does appear to have an editorial board but we can't really verify its editorial process and it kind of gives off  vibes. http://www.caribbeancommunitylive.com/content/nortreus-werley-artist-christian-author-and-drummer-cap-haitien-haiti Carribean Community Live doesn't seem to have anything on their site to show that they have editorial oversight at all, so we have no way of knowing if the article was written by a staff member, a random person, or by someone representing Werley as a whole. Even if we accept these last two sites as reliable sources, they would still not be enough to establish notability in this circumstance. I'm sorry, but the book just doesn't pass notability guidelines for Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:ITEXISTS||WP:SPS)

Comment: Advert created by a '''|single-purpose account
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)