Deletion of Shaniqua (2012 film)

Comment: I looked at the links on the entry and only three of the links can really be used as sources and they might be considered trivial at best since the film isn't the sole focus of the article. It's discussed, but sort of briefly and the update from Movie Vine is so brief that it can't be anything other than trivial. An article has to be in-depth to really count as a reliable source per . The others appear to be press releases, links to the IMDB page, and links to a blog that isn't considered to be notable enough to count as a reliable source. The general rule of thumb is that IMDb is never used as a reliable source, press releases aren't usable because anything released by the people making the film is considered to be a primary source and not reliable, and blogs can only be listed unless they're by people who are considered to be such a notable authority on things that well, they'd have a page on Wikipedia themselves. Roger Ebert would be someone whose blog would be usable, but the blog of someone who just recently started blogging this year really wouldn't be. Even if they're not involved with production, we can't take sources from just anywhere. They have to be from sources that are considered reliable and somewhat notable. I did a search and I'm not pulling anything up that would be considered a reliable source per . I don't mean to sound negative, but there's just not enough sources to really show that this film meets the strict and I mean STRICT guidelines for . Don't get too discouraged by this since most non-mainstream films don't meet these guidelines. To really qualify for this you generally have to be a big blockbuster or a Juno-esque indie flick. You can userfy the article and keep the progress that you've done so far (), so you can keep editing it on your user page and add reliable sources to it as they become available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:FFILM||WP:USERFY)

Comment: The relevant guidelines are at . If filming has really begun, then the question is whether it has gained enough attention to pass the notability test, as evidenced by the interest others are taking in it, rather than the efforts of those responsible for promoting it. After all, a lot of films have been made or proposed over the years, and only some ever got a general commercial release. Wikipedia is not a directory of every film project, and that would be a quite different undertaking, interesting as it might be
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)