Deletion of Centaur (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Article fails , the non-primary sources do not provide anything more than passing mentions, and are mostly used to source a list of appearances in various Dungeons and Dragons media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It seems that this was nominated and kept at a previous AFD due to the claim that it was discussed in secondary sources.  However, actually looking in to it, it would seem that the only bit of non-in universe information that is being supported by those secondary sources is that the fact that they are based off of the mythological centaur.  That one, rather common sense, fact is really not enough to establish notability, and the coverage about them in non-primary sources appears to be too trivial to pass the .  As with many of the other well-known mythological creatures, there is a expansive Centaurs in popular culture|in popular culture article where this version is already mentioned, so a possibly redirect after deletion may be possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)