Deletion of WordWise

Comment: WP:HOUND and  and  by nom. ? Is this going to be good for Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY||WP:BAIT)

Comment: to LetterWise, as the article is insufficiently referenced (per  due to lack of significant coverage), is short (per ), and has considerable |overlap with the proposed target. I note that  is not a guideline, as it has not been ratified. —&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MERGEREASON||WP:OVERLAP||WP:NSOFT)

Comment: does not meet  - has not been "discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field," has not been "recognized as having historical or technical significance by reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFTWARE)

Comment: per nom. It does fail , and its companion LetterWise probably fails it as well. —&#8288
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)