Deletion of Jeopardy! set evolution (2nd nomination)

Comment: The Jeopardy! article is big enough. Including the set evolution would be a nightmare for people with slow connections. Plus the information is very clearly connected and thus it would be nonsensical to apply . It is clearly cronolligically ordered and  doesn't apply there. From Tagi to Bottom, My
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: definetely fails #IINFO and , go to a Jeopardy! wiki. I hate to say this also, but this is pure |cruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:TRIVIA||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: Simply because the content of the article may be somewhat verifiable, it doesn't make this article any less trivial. In order for the set of ''Jeopardy!'' to be considered notable, the article needs to establish the historical importance of this in a broader context than simply ''Jeopardy!''—for example how this might have changed the field of game shows, television and/or American culture. Just for clarification, I would also like to notice that the |notability guideline only establishes "a presumption, not a guarantee, of notability. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion of substantive coverage in reliable sources, it is not suitable for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a repository for things not found elsewhere, a book being in poor condition is not a reason to have an article. Also, a keep at AfD doesn't mean "keep forever" it means, "keep now". |Consensus can and often does change
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: seriously trivial. Also fails #IINFO and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: While there appear to be a lot of  arguments, there really is no reason for the production value of a show to have its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WHOCARES)

Comment: There is reliable source material available in addition to what is cited in the article. ''http://www.amazon.com/Prisoner-Trebekistan-Jeopardy-Bob-Harris/dp/0307339564 Prisoner of Trebekistan: A Decade in Jeopardy!'' and ''http://www.amazon.com/Television-Game-Show-Hosts-Biographies/dp/0786429267 Television Game Show Hosts: Biographies of 32 Stars'' both contain detailed descriptions of the ''Jeopardy!'' set and changes made to it. This is enough reliable source coverage to make the set of Jeopardy |notable and thus worthy of a separate article. Any defects in this article can thus be cured through regular editing, and therefore, per #Alternatives to deletion|policy, it should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:DEL)