Deletion of Eno the Emu

Comment: when i saw this i initially thought of course this shouldn't have an article as  but on looking at the sources its been reported on since early/mid July, its still being covered at mid/late August by local, national, and international sources (even Aussies are picking it up - https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/good-news/2019/08/01/eno-emu-north-carolina/ "Emu on the lam has US authorities in a fluster"), so the question now is whether this passess  ie. "If reliable sources cover a person (or emu?) only in the context of a single event, and if that person (or emu?) otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." Note: i am staying neutral on this as the thought of one of these "big balls of feathers" alluding authorities for months is so funny as to be article-worthy, |definitely not a wikireason for keeping
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:ITSFUNNY)

Comment: Subject fails , ,  and the . See also . There is no reason for this article as of right now. However, five years from now if it's still getting  I will support recreation. See also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:LASTING||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YT||WP:RECENTISM||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NORUSH)