Deletion of Area code 707

Comment: On one hand, it seems to have ~7,000 page views and is pretty much a standalone list, which may show that it is useful for informational purposes (see ). On the other hand, there is not much reliable sourcing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: WP:SOFIXIT,  clearly not done beyond a rudimentary G-search. Area codes are easily sourceable through maps and city lists (in fact, if you https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=area+code+707+cities&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest&gws_rd=ssl search Google with "area code 707 cities", they pop '''right up from Google itself''' and the '''second link''' leads http://www.allareacodes.com/707 to a list of all the exchanges in the area code, allowing all cities in the area code to be ascertained) and have so many WLH links in Wikipedia in community articles it would take forever to remove all the links. They are referred to in references like "the 504", "the 312", "the 404" and even 702 (group)|music groups named after area codes permeate pop culture. We have much bigger problems to worry about here than easily-sourced articles about area codes, and I would suggest the word "crusade" pretty much makes this nomination and future ones involving area codes hostile and untenable, especially because you admitted you threw this nom up "at random". A strong case beyond that |you don't like it needs to be made before deletion is ever considered, and an "at random" nom certainly is not that at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IDLI)