Deletion of 2015 Formula One season

Comment: It seems overwhelmingly likely that there will be a 2015 F1 season so I don't think  is a problem for the existence of the topic. There is, however, the question of whether we can say anything now about the 2015 season that is not itself LINE. There are concrete plans http://www1.skysports.com/formula-1/news/12433/8674831/Circuit-plans-approved-for-2015-Thailand-Grand-Prix-in-Bangkokhttp://www.bangkokpost.com/news/sports/347075/green-light-for-race-routehttp://www.sport1.de/de/formel1/formel1_grandprix/newspage_709781.html for a Thai Grand Prix so this seems notable already; likewise, the McLaren–Honda tie-up is being reported widely http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/21655985http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/105949 albeit more speculatively since neither party has confirmed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Noted, and the offending content removed as being |speculative
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: as |TOOSOON. The Rome Grand Prix experience teaches as the relative value of Grands Prix confirmed at such long lead times. The race has yet to be formally confirmed by motor racing authorities. One of the cited references is even titled "as good as confirmed". So if the Thailand sentence is removed there is insufficient content to carry the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as |TOOSOON and . Unless the FIA confirms that it will occur for one reason or another, there's still a possibility to cancel the series
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: You created the article and per , you can not remove the speedy deletion tags. As a '''WP administrator''' you should know that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: The article is referenced 4 times, all articles concerning the Thai Grand Prix. It doesn't constitute an article right now, just a perfect case of . You still don't understand G4 either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:BOMBARDMENT)