Deletion of PeopleSmart

Comment: per |coverage showing notability and this being an appropriate topic, even were it to remain a stub article. This article is only days old. I hope the nominator might read and show an understanding of  and  before nominating new articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:WIP)

Comment: This AfD is fundamentally flawed on so many levels I don't know where to begin.  First of all this easily passes  per in-depth coverage by independent reliable sources such as the ''New York Times'', ''TechCrunch'' and ''Wall Street Journal'' that are already in the article.  The nom is basing this AfD on their belief the http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/a-phonebook-for-the-21st-century/ NYT piece is a "blog" and then the nom later contradicts himself by saying the NYT piece is a "PR announcement."  Even if the NYT piece had the affectation of the word "blog", it's still a reliable source per  as it's published by a professional reporter in a reliable source, not some kid's LiveJournal blog.  The nom needs to become familiar with what a "reliable source" is before making these AfD's.  The nom then claims that NYT reporter Clair Cain Miller is actually writing a public relations piece on behalf of PeopleSmart.  Does the nom have any evidence of this or is it just |original research slander?  By extension the nom claims reporters Leena Rao of ''TechCrunch'' and Tomio Geron of the ''Wall Street Journal'' of participating in the "PR".  Again, the nom provides zero evidence of this slander on those reporters.  The admin was correct to decline the nom's PROD.  This is part of a recent spate of inherently flawed AfDs by this nom.  Maybe a RfC might be in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEWSBLOG||WP:NOR)

Comment: I'm skeptical that this article can grow beyond stub-class, but it seems to satisfy the bare minimums for .  From my research on Google, there hasn't been significant, ongoing coverage, but the funding got several articles.  Although I dislike relying exclusively on |newsblogs for notability, they are a legitimate source and don't seem to be opinion pieces or overly promotional
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:newsblogs)