Deletion of Niwa niwa niwa niwa tori ga iru

Comment: Speedy on account that the article itself is plain cruft in question, it should be speedily deleted — it's blantantly |unverified content and |original research. '''~'''Special:Contributions/I'm anonymous|I&#39;m anonymous
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:OR)

Comment: While different Wikipedias may have different inclusion standards, the general concept is the same, and nowhere does it say that we are only supposed to focus on things in English-speaking culture. In fact, doing so would represent systemic bias, a clear breach of . Being the English language Wikipedia just means that the articles are '''in''' English, not which articles there are. Thus the only reason this articles topic is in Japanese is because its significance is in the way it's written in Japanese, for the same reason that you wouldn't expect the buffalo sentence to be translated into Spanish on es. That said, I don't know that there are enough reliable sources verifying the significance of this phrase compared to Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den (to give a more appropriate example), and I'm not going to argue for keeping
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: and merge to a one-sentence entry on List of homophonous phrases, and after the headache of trying to make sense of its English twin, Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo, I'm starting to see the merits of  as a valid argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)