Deletion of Bruno Cetto

Comment: The problem I have with this article is that there are no independent references about him.  My own search didn't find much either.  Of course, his research was pre-internet and in Italian to boot, so it's not necessarily surprising my search wasn't successful.  Still, there need to be some sources that show that either  is met or that his work on fungi made him an expert so as to meet . There are a lot of cites for his 7 volume work, but his h-index doesn't seem very high (though this isn't really my area
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPROF)

Comment: According to this source http://www.agiati.it/UploadDocs/5287_Soci_vol_2.pdf he was a member of :it:Accademia Roveretana degli Agiati but I don't know if this is sufficient to pass #3 of . The sources on the Italian page I do not think would pass  here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: We need sources to say something about him, the article has things that are formatted sort of like sources but they are unverifiable, and I couldn't find anything. You would think that by now, two weaks after the start of the AfD and the spirited defense of the article by another editor, something would have been done to improve the disastrous state of the article, but no. In its current state it doesn't convince me that we can have an article that passes , regardless of whether the multivolume book or the club named after him are deemed enough for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)