Deletion of Humanity's End

Comment: I have not (yet) begun work to expand and source the article (later tonight) but find |immediately found in-depth commentary and analysis in secondary sources http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/38012/humanitys-end/ ''DVD Talk'' http://www.homemediamagazine.com/dvd-reviews/humanity%E2%80%99s-end-dvd-review ''Home Media Magazine'' http://dvd-magazine.eu/dvd/?p=1525 ''Virtual DVD Magazine'' (German) and http://www.quietearth.us/articles/2009/03/19/Cool-retro-poster-and-new-trailer-for-ambitious-scifi-flick-HUMANITYS-END ''Quiet Earth''... and to a far lesser extent, those in http://www.horrortalk.com/reviews/2364-humanitys-end-dvd-review.html ''Horror Talk'' http://www.close-upfilm.com/2012/05/humanitys-end-15-close-up-film-dvd-review/ ''Close-up Film'' http://www.411mania.com/movies/columns/132656 ''411 Mania'' http://www.blogomatic3000.com/2012/05/02/dvd-review-humanitys-end/ ''Blogomatic3000'' http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2012/05/dvd-review-humanitys-end-2009.html ''Flickering Myth'' as indicators that we have a meeting of the requisistes of  and .  While yes, |its state when nominated is/was poor,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Humanity%27s_End&diff=498697335&oldid=498659458 and with respects to the nominator, the addressable issues of expansion and sourcing do not require deletion. We have plenty with which to build the nominated stub into something which better serves the project. Back in a while
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE||WP:NF||WP:UGLY)