Deletion of Obsessive love

Comment: and if desired by editors merge with, Infatuation. Seems to be the same topic, see 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: There are obvious |alternatives to deletion such as merger with infatuation or limerence, which are much the same topic which is clearly notable as https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=39zz916f9eMC entire books are written about it.  Determining the best title and structure for this is a matter of ordinary editing not deletion because |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: probably, but the current description is so vague that I can't tell if it should redirect to infatuation, limerence, Relationship obsessive–compulsive disorder|Relationship obsessive–compulsive disorder (ROCD) or erotomania (all of which need major work btw). I just deleted a sentence on Obsessive love that said it should be "differentiated from relationship obsessive–compulsive disorder (ROCD) that commonly includes doubts regarding one's own feelings towards an intimate partner, preoccupation with the partner’s feelings towards oneself, doubts about the rightness of the relationship and preoccupation with the perceived flaws of the partner," because that was an inaccurate and unsourced definition of ROCD. It looks like it was based off the Wikipedia article ROCD which gives an equally poor, unsourced definition of ROCD. ROCD is just regular OCD where the intrusive thoughts (obsessions) have a relationship-oriented theme. I think that might be where Obsessive love fits best. It looks like there have been multiple unsuccessful attempts made to adequately source this article. I wasn't able to find anything that meets  in my own search, which would be needed for the article's current tone. It seems to me that redirecting it makes sense since it's doubtful it can stand on its own. I'm also fine with deleting it completely
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: very selectively, if at all, and '''Redirect''' to infatuation, which looks to be talking about a similar subject. I'm sure there are small differences, but I'm not confident this article could be salvaged as it is and the distinctions are probably not enough to justify a stand-alone article. In addition to books that use the term, there need to be books that use the term in a way that's distinct from topics we cover under different names. At best this is  as it purports far too much psychology without using books that meet |our standards for content about health/mental health. It even makes arguments like "Although not categorized specifically under any specific mental diagnosis by the DSM IV, some people argue that obsessive love is considered to be a mental illness similar to "attachment disorder, borderline personality disorder, and erotomania". ??? That someone wrote that in a book does not mean we should be including it here. Especially when it's as horribly defined and explained as it is, that's problematic. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:MEDRS)