Deletion of Eliot Bernstein

Comment: It's just possible that Iviewit could be an article, but there are very few independent and reliable sources out there. Almost all of the information about the patent theft story comes from  sources. Even the sources in the article are things like http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/pr5.pdf this pdf of a 7-year-old industry article that doesn't mention the company at all, annotated with boxes making claims that this is the problem the company solved. If the sources existed -- CNet or John Dvorak or somebody writing "Iviewit solved the internet video problem!" -- they wouldn't have to do that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Nowhere in  does it dictate that all editors must disclose that they have a lack of conflict of interest. This discussion has proceeded entirely according to the rules so far
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: unless verifiable references regarding this person come forward during the AFD period. Press releases don't cut it for my concerns. At present, the article doesn't indicate notability as per WP:BIO. (And considering I've never heard of this person before, and came here after looking at a |deletion review request regarding the company, no, I don't have a conflict
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)