Deletion of Spanish solution

Comment: I found some stuff, but most of it isn't ''reliable, third-party, published''. The German article on this topic (Spanische Lösung) was created on February 18, 2005. According to the dewiki article, the spanish-solution concept is also referred to as "Zwillingsbahnsteig" (lit. "twin platform"), cited in the dewiki article with a https://www-docs.b-tu.de/fg-eisenbahn/public/Lehre/Stud_Arbeiten/Diplomarbeiten/mueller.pdf PDF doc from Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus (November 2005).An online-search for the German term "spanische lösung" gave some results, with the majority being passing mentions newer than 2005. (https://www.merkur.de/lokales/muenchen/stadt-muenchen/zweite-stammstrecke-sti732792/2-stammstrecke-muenchen-station-am-hauptbahnhof-falsch-geplant-9873205.html Münchner Merkur article about the planned "Hauptbahnhof Bahnhofplatz station" (passing mention of the concept), http://stuttgart-journal.de/tp3/2015/10/29/haushalt-region-stuttgart-390-millionen-zum-verteilen/ Stuttgart Journal article about regional budget (passing mention of the concept), https://www.cdu-region-stuttgart.de/2015/10/19/spanische-loesung-fuer-die-s-bahnstationen-auf-der-stammstrecke/ CDU Region Stuttgart proposal from 19/10/2015 to refit Stuttgart S-Bahn trunk line stations with spanish solution platforms (non-RS))A gbooks search in German for "spanische lösung bahnsteige" seemed more useful, with some hits to books from pre-2005 in German, so the term "Spanische Lösung" was used before the creation of the dewiki & enwiki articles. (https://books.google.de/books?id=egPLBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA63&dq=spanische+l%C3%B6sung+bahnsteig&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQpJi96_bdAhXPh6YKHcjDDXQQ6AEIMTAB#v=onepage&q=spanische%20l%C3%B6sung%20bahnsteig&f=false VDI-Lexikon Bauingenieurwesen, p. 63, https://books.google.de/books?id=0dBPAAAAYAAJ&q=spanische+l%C3%B6sung+bahnsteig&dq=spanische+l%C3%B6sung+bahnsteig&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQpJi96_bdAhXPh6YKHcjDDXQQ6AEINjAC Städtische Untergrund-Verkehrsbauten, Band 2: 1970, p. 48, https://books.google.de/books?id=5BgkBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA37&dq=spanische+l%C3%B6sung+bahnsteig&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQpJi96_bdAhXPh6YKHcjDDXQQ6AEIOzAD#v=onepage&q=spanische%20l%C3%B6sung%20bahnsteig&f=false Handbuch Eisenbahninfrastruktur, p. 37, https://books.google.de/books?id=9uK3AAAAIAAJ&q=spanische+l%C3%B6sung+bahnsteig&dq=spanische+l%C3%B6sung+bahnsteig&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRo5ih7PbdAhVJEiwKHQ0ICaY4ChDoAQgnMAA S-Bahn München: Alba, 1997, p. 59)Also, state-owned rail operator Deutsche Bahn and DB Netz AG use the term in their documents and on their websites regarding the construction of the second munich s-bahn trunk line. I know that's neither indepth coverage nor a reliable third-party source, but it shows that the term is used in somewhat official/rail-industry context. (https://www.2.stammstrecke-muenchen.de/strecke/streckenverlauf-und-bahnhoefe/hauptbahnhof DB Netz AG website about the planned "München Hauptbahnhof Bahnhofplatz station" mentions the concept, https://www.deutschebahn.com/resource/blob/1299956/310abe927114b08f57c7de15973266a8/04-05-Die-2--Stammstrecke-und-die-Station-Marienhof-data.pdf Deutsche Bahn AG PDF about the planned "Marienhof station" (mention of the concept), https://www.2.stammstrecke-muenchen.de/strecke/streckenverlauf-und-bahnhoefe/marienhof DB Netz AG website about the planned "Marienhof station" (mention of the concept), http://2-stammstrecke.die-bahn-baut.de/docs/275/2SBSS_PFA3neu_18-1_Erlaeuterungsbericht_Geologie.pdf 2. S-Bahn-Stammstrecke München Erleuterungsbereicht Planfeststellungsabschnitt 3neu 18.02.2010)I also found two PDFs from the Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr und Technologie (Bavarian ministry of economic affairs and transport), and one from the Eisenbahn-Bundesamt (Federal Railway Authority), mentioning the German "Spanische Lösung". (https://www.ris-muenchen.de/RII/RII/DOK/SITZUNGSVORLAGE/470284.pdf Bahnausbau München: Machbarkeitsstudie Vertiefende Untersuchung 2. S-Bahn-Stammstrecke Dezember 2002, http://www.verkehr.bayern.de/assets/stmi/vum/schiene/s-bahn-stammstrecke_nku_bahnknoten_kurzbericht_endfassung_250112.pdf Standardisierte Bewertung des Vorhabens 2. Stammstrecke - Startkonzept (on behalf of Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Energie und Technologie), https://www.eba.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PF/Beschluesse/Bayern/51_Mue-PFA2_1.Pae_2.%20S-Bahn-Stammstrecke.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp%3Bv=3 Federal Railway Authority (insert super-lenghty and complex german title here))I'd say the spanish-solution concept could be a suitable article topic, if sources allow for an article that isn't just a Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary|dictionary definition. The biggest problem with the article in its current form is a lack of sources and the super long list of example stations (almost all without references/sources). Regarding keep/merge/delete, im undecided for now. (Maybe  could be a solution
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: The sources provided are enough to pass  and this AfD was based on a faulty premise. o idea why this hasn't been closed yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly the initial entire rationale for advocating the deletion of this page couldn't have been more wrong!  The term existed before, as a  would have (and has) revealed.  The nom should have been withdrawn at that point and it is quite, quite improper to now piggyback on the majorly flawed OP to raise extraneous "arguments" for anything other than a straight keep.  The railway industry term "Spanish solution" is quite important in the industry, for those familiar with the industry, i.e., ''the subject matter experts'', even if outsiders can spend five years wondering whether it is a term of art or not.   Now, once one understands this is a highly relevant and usable industry term, what could be more natural than citing examples of its current and past use?  The article stands on its own and is quite useful as is; any small weaknesses should be addressed by interested editors, and remember: AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)