Deletion of Mark Budman

Comment: the only possible claim of notability I see is  and he clearly doesn't meet that guideline. The only news-style coverage I find of him is trivial mentions of him in the context of his books, and none of them appear to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: all of the mentions above provided by SoWhy are mainly from one local paper, which per  only counts as one source. Those from other papers are virtually identical in both content and layout, meaning that they aren't intellectually independent from one another. As such, we don't have coverage in sourcing as would be expected under the general guideline in N or under a subject specific guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Not sure about meeting  but probably meets , see these articles I found that talk both about his writing and one of his patents: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/13241011/wikipediaarticles_for_deletionmark/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/13241008/wikipediaarticles_for_deletionmark/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/13241009/wikipediaarticles_for_deletionmark/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/13241005/wikipediaarticles_for_deletionmark/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/13240997/wikipediaarticles_for_deletionmark/ https://www.newspapers.com/clip/13240996/wikipediaarticles_for_deletionmark/. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BASIC)

Comment: If you do a search with Google  probably meets  IMHO but article could be improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BASIC)