Deletion of Native Americans and horses

Comment: WP:SKCRIT - the nominator fails to advance a policy or guideline based rationale. . A solid article which meets GNG and has even improved during this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: the description of this as a C grade term paper is remarkably apt. Maybe there's an article to be written on this topic, maybe not; but this isn't it.  seems called for, since in my experience changing a pre-existing bad article into a good one is harder than writing a good one from scratch. If there's anything salvageable here (I'm skeptical) then Horse culture looks as though it could accommodate it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: There are issues with the article, but it's undoubtedly notable (such that I'm surprised we didn't cover it already under a different title). Doesn't seem like it's quite in  territory. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: This nomination is not policy-based and is contrary to numerous policies including ;;;;;;&c.  I could list lots of sources but this is not necessary as the article already has a reasonable selection
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:BITE||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:OWN||WP:POINT)