Deletion of Jennifer Carpenter (academic)

Comment: Meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Citation impact http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sauthors=Jennifer-Carpenter clearly indicates notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: By citation counts above. That just citation counts alone can demonstrate wikipedia-notability has been part of the  guideline by longstanding consensus. Indeed, for academics, they are the most important means for doing so.  See criterion #1, and Wikipedia:PROF#Notes_and_examples #1 explaining it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as non-notable, fails , furthermore, information is unverifiable even if someone comes up with some whacky fantasy rule for declaring her notable in their opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think she fails . I'm not an expert and can't claim I wrote the standards, but I think she fails them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)