Deletion of Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group

Comment: to Chow Tai Fook. Soft delete/merge are pretty much all related options. The company fails  as written right now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: meets  when considering Chinese-language sources such as http://std.stheadline.com/daily/article/detail/1841797-%E8%B2%A1%E7%B6%93-%E5%91%A8%E5%A4%A7%E7%A6%8F%E5%B9%B4%E8%8A%B1%E4%B8%89%E5%84%84%E6%8E%A8%E5%89%B5%E6%96%B0%E5%8F%8A%E8%87%AA%E5%8B%95%E5%8C%96 https://news.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20180913/s00004/1536776707603 https://topick.hket.com/article/2018164/%E8%B2%B7%E9%87%91%E4%B9%9F%E4%BA%92%E5%8B%95%E3%80%80%E5%91%A8%E5%A4%A7%E7%A6%8F%E9%AB%94%E9%A9%97%E5%BA%97%E9%9A%A8%E6%84%8F%E8%A9%A6%E6%88%B4%E9%87%91%E9%A3%BE%E3%80%90%E6%9C%89%E7%89%87%E3%80%91
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  though sources are appalling at present
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)

Comment: this is a  company on the Hong Kong Exchange as clearly shown on the page - the burden is on the nominator to show that sources don't exist for a multinational with a 90 year history that is a big part of a notable conglomerate Chow Tai Fook. There is a public good in providing coverage for large public companies that employ thousands, have numerous investors, and who your pension fund might be invested in. They are a lot more important and notable than some East German handball player that made it to the Olympics 50 years ago and was never heard from again but is treated as autonotable because sources must exist!  makes the case that almost always do sources exist to ensure notability because the filing requirements, financial press coverage of listed companies, and ongoing reporting requirements for listed companies generate significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED||WP:LISTED)