Deletion of Auth0

Comment: The fluffy terminology can be easily removed. There is plenty of good coverage. TechCrunch is a good source https://techcrunch.com/2016/08/24/auth0-series-b/, as is ''USA Today'' http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/2014/09/30/baverman-entrepreneurs-and-startups-auth0/16217859/, and ''The Seattle Times'' http://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/tech-spotlight-auth0-provides-the-first-line-of-cyber-defense/.  is not cleanup. Cleanup occurs when an editor rolls up their sleeves to fix a problem themselves, even if the relevant articles seem boring
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: as corporate spam; the article largely consists of intricate detail on a non-notable entity (for example, providing a handy table on all of the funding rounds. The article exists as a client / investor prospectus, which wikipedia is . Let's not encourage spammers by keeping such articles. If it were to be kept it would need to be reduced to a paragraph at best to comply with Wikipedia policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)