Deletion of Transmetropolitan (album)

Comment: because the rationale for deletion doesn't make any sense. The album has reviews, but the sources might not be reliable, but maybe they are, and anyway the magazines have articles in other Wikipedias. What? "No real assertion of notability" is meaningless per , but if it did mean something, it would be undercut by the next clause, which offers two potential assertions of notability. If you're really this unsure about whether you should nominate this for deletion, then please don't, for fear of a) wasting other volunteers' time, and b) deleting an article on a potentially notable subject. Just leave it alone and move on to the next one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ASSERTN)

Comment: The sources from Visions and Zero are reliable. I found some more reliable sources which talk about the album: http://www.metal-temple.com/site/catalogues/entry/reviews/cd_3/w_2/war_from_a_harlots_4.htm Metal Temple, http://www.metalstorm.net/pub/review.php?review_id=4592 Metal Storm, https://www.metalrage.com/reviews/1641/war-from-a-harlots-mouth-transmetropolitan.html Metal Rage, https://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/15080/War-from-a-Harlots-Mouth-Transmetropolitan/ Sputnik Music, https://www.theprp.com/2020/05/01/news/war-from-a-harlots-mouth-release-remastered-transmetropolitan/ The PRP and https://metalinjection.net/reviews/cd-review-war-from-a-harlots-mouth-transmetropolitan Metal Injection. With these, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)