Deletion of Jesse Haynes

Comment: does not meet  or , a search brings up nothing |reliable, similarly the book ''creepers'' does not meet , with again no reliable sources found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:RS||WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Couldn't find any additional reliable sources either; delete until it fulfils , let alone . &#8209;&#8209
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: This is extremely, extremely promotional - so much so that I'd actually endorse a speedy deletion via . This is probably because there's a very likely COI here and if this wasn't done by a paid editor, it was likely done by someone who knows the author. It could also very likely pass A7, as the only claims of note are his Amazon sales (which mean nothing on Wikipedia) and a social media following. A look at his YT account shows that he has all of 10 followers, which goes against the claims in the article. The only coverage he's received is from Tulsa World, a local source. If I don't speedy this, I'm very tempted to close this one early after a few people weigh in on this because there's pretty much zero chance of this surviving deletion given the dearth of sourcing that comes up via a search
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11)