Deletion of Gavin Warren

Comment: or '''Draftify''': The subject ''is'' getting coverage—for example, the ''Houston Chronicle'' article—but he may fall shy of , with only two roles, to date, that might pass the first criterion. Given his young age, I tend to agree with the nominator; however, since he has soon-to-be-released projects, I'd have no problem with the article being moved to "draftspace
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: The subject mentioned above is a notable child actor. The article has met the requirements stated in . The article should not be deleted since the subject is yet to make more contributions hence the article can be expanded in the coming years. Thats my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: After reading the cited articles, I think the subject meets all the requirements for . He has multiple appearances in notable films where he has a significant roles. Three of the films he has had a role in have their own Wikipedia articles, meaning that they are notable. I haven't watched those films myself, but given that his roles are discussed in the cited articles, I would say that they are significant. It's clear that the article meets GNG. There are 13 cited sources, and although all of them are certainly not reliable, at least 5 are from reliable publications (LA Times, Houston Chronicle, local news). So, the article also meets verifiabilty. However, there is information in the article that isn't mentioned in the sources and isn't verifiable. I find it much more appropriate to remove the unverified information from the article than to delete it entirely. Specifically, the Personal Life section can be removed, along with some of the info in the Career section. I would also suggest removing the unreliable sources, such as the subject's personal webpage, and to remove irrelevant links in the Further Reading section
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)