Deletion of List of Nokia products (2nd nomination)

Comment: Same reasoning as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Motorola products|AfD of Motorola products.  See there for detailed argument.  Highlights include: Compliant with ; provides information beyond a category; provides structure and navigation; clear inclusion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: I have, not that it's relevant. Please note 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: While I wonder if we really need an article on every cellphone in existence, this is no more a directory than List of Google products, List of IBM products, Amiga models and variants, List of Intel microprocessors, or List of Microsoft Windows versions. And if by "directory" you mean "repository of information", then every article fails #DIR. Wikipedia:Deletion_policy/Brand_name_products says "Minor products from a company should be merged into a 'list of minor products from this company' which is kept in the company article, unless it becomes too large as above." This list appears too large for the Nokia article. I'm wary of Wikipedia being used for marketing, but I don't think this article reads like an advertisement. Words like "ground-breaking" and "pedestrian" are highly opinionated though. If there are many articles on this list, it may even be wise to merge that information into this list instead of having a separate article on each and every cellphone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I think it's disingenuous to cite  here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: 1. ''non-notable products'' () - to argue this, I think you would have to argue against the existence of the linked articles about each phone and series. If they exist, this list is useful, and much better than a Category. 2. ''not a directory'' - None of #DIR apply (1 - these topics are clearly not loosely associated; 2 - not genealogical or phonebook; 3/4 are aimed at avoiding promotional material, whereas this is archival). Similarly 3 - It is hardly ''indiscriminate'' (#INFO). Personally, I have just this week found this article a very useful resource after starting work at phone-related company - finding information and comparisons on non-current models is not as easy as it might be. (You may take that as a declaration of interest if you wish, but I've also found it useful before) That said, I agree with comment here and in the previous AfD (and in Talk:List_of_Nokia_products|Talk) that the page needs cleaning up. (Aside: the revision history suggests that you proposed this ''before'' reading the previous AfD debate, and I don't feel that this AfD adds anything new
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)