Deletion of Craigslist (song)

Comment: with either Alpocalypse or Internet Leaks. As noted in , few songs qualify for individual articles, and "Craigslist" doesn't seem to meet those criteria - no significant chart positions, no awards or honors, and no performances by multiple artists. Articles for both Alpocalypse or Internet Leaks have been around for a while and are logical destinations for a merge
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: The article's first four references - http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10265362-36.htmlhttp://www.spinner.com/2009/06/15/weird-al-yankovic-craigslist-video-premiere/http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2009/06/the_latest_from_weird_al_yanko_1.htmlhttp://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/92456-Weird-Al-Puts-The-Doors-on-Craigslist - plus this sampling of additional sources - http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/06/weird-al-channels-the-lizard-king-on-craigslist/http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/music/weird-al-yankovics-new-single-craiglist-homage-to-the-doors/story-e6frexl9-1225736491013http://buzzworthy.mtv.com/2009/06/16/new-video-weird-al-yankovic-craigslist/http://exclaim.ca/News/weird_al_taps_ray_manzarek_for_ode_to_craigslisthttp://www.upi.com/Entertainment_News/2009/06/16/Weird-Al-releases-Craigslist-single/UPI-23821245164649/ - demonstrate that the song has received significant coverage in multiple |reliable sources. Per , it is not suggested that a song ''must'' have been covered, charted or been awarded in order to be notable, only that those songs which fit that set of criteria are indeed "probably notable". The guideline goes on to state: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." This implies a "reasonably detailed" song article is one that goes beyond a stub - a standard which in my estimation has been (or easily can be) satisfied given the information contained within the aforementioned sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NSONGS)