Deletion of Chitwanix OS

Comment: Having looked at a number of the sources, a passing mention in a newspaper article is never enough to satisfy . A one-line mention without extensive coverageas as seen http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/fullNews.php?headline=Celebrate+software+freedom&NewsID=390960 here is nothing more than a passing mention. None of the sources satisfy , and Facebook cannot be used as one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS notwithstanding, many of the distributions at List of Linux distributions probably do not meet .  In any case, this distribution should probably be added to that list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia |notability requirements not nearly met. Non-notable distribution. Come back in a few years when there are sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: non-notable Linux-distribution created by a COI editor as a promotional vehicle for the distro; fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The provided sources do nothing to indicate it's notability. One passing reference in one newspaper article is the sum total of references that meet the criteria of . I suggest a redirect to a mention on List of Linux distributions would be of merit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)