Deletion of Binders full of women (3rd nomination)

Comment: I'm going to remind people of ,  This has certainly proven to have a long lasting usage, which to the uninformed, WP should be here to explain.  But in WP terms, that is not necessary.  This was the driving beat of news and internet activity following the statement.  Its a partisan thing that the Romney side wishes and wishes would go away--would have gone away before the election,  Thus I suggest the act of trying to remove this element of history from WP is .  So I throw another '''Trout''' at the nominator and the partisans who repeatedly attack this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:POV)

Comment: Ongoing coverage in reliable sources make this pass both  and . Retrospective analyses and 'what went wrong'-type write ups will continue to make reference to this incident (we'll see more of these in the run-up to the 2016 elections
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT||WP:PERSISTENCE)