Deletion of Baba Ramdev (movie)

Comment: fails  … no . Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{#if:138.88.7.48|{{User|138.88.7.48}}|Special:Contributions/138.88.7.48|138.88.7.48
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE||WP:RS)

Comment: being "mentioned" is not the same as "has received significant coverage" in |reliable sources (note ''plural''), especially considering that Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema is apparently not notable enough to have an article. &mdash; Special:Contributions/138.88.7.48|138.88.7.48
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: We're talking about the rather sparse Cinema of  Rajasthan... an area not known for its film industry, having only produced 88 films in the 62 years from 1942 to 2004, and that Baba Ramdev was among the few Rajasthani films re-released on VCD and DVD 40 years later.http://www.screenindia.com/old/fullstory.php?content_id=9108. Not being notable to the English-speaking world does not mean it is unsuitable for en.Wikipedia, as I am encouraged to remember that it does not matter to wikipedia that it might not written up in the New York Times or Washington Post when  suggests "Wikipedia should include all notable topics, even if the subject is not notable within the English speaking population", and  urges a wider view and acceptance even if something is dificult to source in English. The article may never be more than a stub, but it's an acceptable and encyclopedic stub that shares sourced information about an very early film
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNKNOWNHERE||WP:CSB)