Deletion of StereoGraphics

Comment: Reference 1 is small step to WP:N, but nowhere near sufficient Lots of non-notable enterprises have Bloomberg profiles. Reference 2 is substantial, and a |secondary source, but the coverage is brief. Reference 3 is an interview with Lipton—hence a |primary source, and can't confer notoriety, though it can be used for bits of information and interest in an article.  Reference 4 may be too much of a |promotional website/journal for reliability, and the mentions of RealD are trivial, anyway. Reference 5 is promotional, ergo not a reliable source. Not enough to confer WP:N
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:PRIMARY||WP:PROMO)

Comment: StereoGraphics and CrystalEyes are . Added , reduced Lipton's mentions. Article could use more content, categories and infobox
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)