Deletion of Ryo Hazuki

Comment: to Shenmue - TTN's logic is right - there's no demonstration of notability of the character on its own and the article presently is either duplicating the plot of the two games or  on his fighting style.  Maybe there are sources, but that needs to be shown to keep this article -- and given the age and origin of the games, this I don't see happening
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: to List of Shenmue characters (although that list's right of existance is also a little stretched for a 2-game series). Plot-only article (#PLOT) and no evidence of ABILITY. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: as lacking significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, thus failing . There's some trivial coverage here, but that's not enough to pass . But good enough for a redirect, perhaps with a sentence or two. No prejudice against splitting this character out if there's enough reliable third-party coverage to support something non-trivial, that isn't just filled in with |original research from primary sources
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:OR)