Deletion of Fleshlight

Comment: But ... even if it does meet , it's a copy of the advertising brocure.  I actually wouldn't assert {{tl|db-copyvio}}, because advertising brocures are meant to be copied, but there's nothing encyclopedic there.  The first sentence is about all that should remain. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Passes  if we take "published works in all forms" to include on-line publication, and definitely well-known in certain sections of society.  See Realdoll for an equivalent case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per  products criteria "The product or service has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." It has. http://www.clitical.com/sex-toy-reviews/guy-toys/fleshlight-review.php, http://www.nerve.com/PersonalEssays/Maynard/fleshlight/, and various others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)