Deletion of Recombinant text

Comment: If the article can be reproduced with independent resources then let that happen.  As it is it is  and cannot stand
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: the term is used in many different ways. For example, "DJ Spooky" used the term in a rap/poetics context in the 1990's. Other people use the term in a hypertext context, but it is uncertain if they are talking about the same thing. And the term was used in an essay on "utopian plagiarism". However, I was unable to find any use of the term in WebofKnowledge or Jstor.org. The article has a much more well-developed definition of recombinant text than can be found anywhere on the internet. The sources provided are all by Mr Allen, except two 1982 books which do not mention the term, and two forums. Therefore the article is in violation of #OR points 1 and 3, and in violation of . The way it is currently written, it is also in violation of #MANUAL. As for the possiblity of rewriting the article, since it is currently missing any independent secondary sources that attest to the notability or importance of the term or the concept, it (the term) fails otability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SYN||WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: Under  and .  My goodness the author of the piece starts the article with the statement “…Recombinant text is a term proposed by Michael Allan”, and Michael Allen is the author of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COI)