Deletion of Trayvon Martin

Comment: per , "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Trayvon is not notable just by virtue of being shot. This falls under  - his role is not significant in the event, he is the victim of the shooting, not the perpetrator. Without him, the shooting still might have taken place. Without the perpetrator, it never would've happened. The history of this article should be deleted, and then a redirect created with a clean history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to Shooting of Trayvon Martin as a -notable death. and . He is notable for having been shot to death by the neighborhood watch that ignored police instructions. It is the circumstances of his death that are significant, including wearing a hoodie, which would be covered in the shooting article.  -- Special:Contributions/70.24.249.39|70.24.249.39
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: with Shooting of Trayvon Martin per  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: Martin is not notable, but the circustamces of his death and the trial for his case are, article should be moved or deleted, it is blatantly a violation of  and is clearly a US bias, there are thousand of notable deaths in other parts of the world which have president speechs and so on, this does not refactorates the fact that he was not notable beyond his death event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1EVENT)

Comment: I'm going to have say that I'd delete this article. His notability is only for the shooting. His prior life that has nothing to do with the shooting has no relevance in this encyclopedia.  comes to mind, even though it doesn't directly cover this matter. Nevertheless, the details having to do with the shooting and aftermath should be kept at the shooting pages. If those phrases were removed, it would only cover personal details that don't really belong here. For that reason, I have to vote delete. This really doesn't seem appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL)

Comment: or redirect to Shooting of Trayvon Martin. Obviously Martin does not merit a biography beyond |the one event and |as a memorial. Also, this creates an attractive  nuisance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:ATTACK)

Comment: 1E, a part of the  policy, trumps GNG. Its whole purpose is to discourage (even prohibit, if you take it that far) articles on subjects who are GNG or otherwise notable only for one event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This seems to be the exception listed in  regarding the role of the person and the event, and the subject easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:GNG)