Deletion of Beiruk

Comment: For the moment fails . For a country that presumably existed in 19th century (and even early 20th century) much better sources should be available. What is listed in the article does not seem to pass  and I could not find anything better after quite a bit of google searching. I am not sure that this is a hoax. At least one of the sources listed in the article, in Spanish, contains relevant info. Here is a link to a translated version (using Google automatic translator):http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.teldeactualidad.com%2Fhemeroteca%2Fhemeroteca_secciones.php%3Fid%3D15%26seccion%3Dcartas&sl=es&tl=en&hl=en&ie=UTF-8. I am not sure what the website hosting this page is but I would think that for the kind of claims contained in the article much better sourcing is needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: The only Beiruk connected to Morocco is a historical person: Sheikh Beiruk. This search turns up no reliable sources on a place called Beiruk: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=Beiruk+Morocco&meta= Even if the article was on this person, he would fail notability and  but it isn't--its on a place called Beiruk. Therefore it lacks verifiability, notability and likely contains 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:OR)