Deletion of Quackery

Comment: as an obviously notable topic (borderline |speedy or ). Nominating this article, with the rationale "Inherently POV", speaks to either a profound misunderstanding of  or bad faith. A combination of the two cannot be entirely excluded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:SNOW||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per , and no reasons presented considered to be reasons for deletion.  &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Easily satisfies .  "Inherently POV" is not a deletion criteria, per Wikipedia:Content forking#Articles whose subject is a POV.  Given the nominator's history, this is probably a ed nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:POINT)