Deletion of Flipora

Comment: The malware factor is irrelevant unless it gained further coverage for being discovered to be malware. It has had several paragraphs dedicated to it from Forbes in multiple articles, Huffington Post gave it a reasonably sized paragraph, and The Hindu dedicated a lengthy article to it. Sorry guys, but it clearly satisfies GNG, and |you not liking it does not change that. There's also a lengthy piece by http://www.pcworld.com/article/2365362/fliporas-stumbleupon-rival-now-senses-your-mood.html PC World, for example. Notability is not temporary, and we have a whole year of it getting coverage from just the sources in the article - one of which was published less than a month ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Two things, -1. , and 2. Sources -(http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/flipora-set-to-hit-the-stratosphere/article4088255.ece The Hindu, http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/dont-search-just-flip-through-the-web/article2694818.ece The Hindu2, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/article1427822.ece The Hindu3, http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2014/04/30/flipora-raising-30m-as-it-grows-social-discovery.html Biz Journals, http://venturebeat.com/2012/06/25/flipora-is-the-fastest-growing-social-surfing-service-youve-never-heard-of-interview/ Venturebeat, http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/25/infoaxes-flipora-passes-8m-registered-users-adds-discovery-engine/ Techcrunch, http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnrampton/2015/01/27/five-new-apps-challenging-facebook-and-twitter-for-content-discovery/ Forbes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: The fact that it is malware makes it more notable, not less. Significant coverage exists in the sources provided by {{u|Anupmehra}}. It passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)