Deletion of Gracie Glam

Comment: Gracie Glam clearly passes . She won the AVN Best New Starlet Award in 2011, which is one of the most prestigious awards in the adult entertainment industry. Redban has absolutely no real concerns over the . He is just frustrated that the Wikipedia article on one of his favorite porn stars, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Bitoni (2nd nomination)|Audrey Bitoni, was deleted. He stated in Bitoni's discussion "Either this page remains or you remove 99% of the pornstar biographies on Wikipedia", which is his only motivation for starting these AfD's. This is very disruptive behavior which should result in Redban being blocked. It's not like he has even contributed anything useful to this encyclopedia. Have you all seen what he has done to Eva Angelina's article? It's a mess now and sourced mostly to her Twitter and porn studio websites like Brazzers and Naughty America
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly meets  and very likely . AVN Award for Best New Starlet is undoubtly one of the major awards in this field and clearly meets the requirements of our guideline. CNBC is an unquestionably a reliable source as discussed multiple times on , and being included in a "top-pornstar list" CNBC article is possibly an additional claim of notability, surely not a reason for deletion. The article "The Fresh Effect" from ''AVN Magazine'', Vol.26/No.6, Issue 331, is also a reliable source, not a press release but a genuine journalistic piece (part of the  yearly "Fresh Effect" series which analyze year by year the most important names, products and trends of the year). No real basis for this nom outside 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG||WP:RSN||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)