Deletion of Tallahassee SC

Comment: Just like to point out to the closing editor, that not a single one of the keep !votes has provided the type of in-depth sourcing to show that any of these teams passes, , and they clearly do not pass . The only sources provided are a nice in-depth article from a non-RS source (urban pitch) and several token mentions of the Bugeaters team. The Tallahasee and AFC Mobile teams have nothing but routine local coverage. The Bugeaters turned up a whopping 8 hits, mostly local coverage, with a couple of brief mentions, the Central Texas team turned up zilch, while the Biloxi team turned up 2 local coverage articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: WP:FOOTYN is really more of a rough guide than a firm guideline, the question really is do these clubs have enough coverage to meet . I don't have time to look through all five of them right now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this feels like a  nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The club definitely meets the  guideline. The additional items clearly meet the full threshold. Further, there are two other leagues who have the same hurdle which I have pointed out, yet, only this league is singled out. Those have many clubs which are less commonly known and have not been connected and affiliated with top level pro teams. It is further odd that this page has existed, been edited many times and is just now flagged. The # of my edits shouldn’t have any impact on the threshold, which the club definitely meets. I did join in 2009 since you’ve pointed this out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: while  "is really more of a rough guide than a firm guideline", doesn't mean they have a pass at meeting , which other than the routine local coverage which would be expected of a minor league club, none of these passes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN||WP:GNG)

Comment: being in a league which is eligible to participate in the national cup does not meet .  The team must have actually played in the tournament (and not in the qualification for the tournament
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: with the references given, GNG is clearly met in some of these cases. No prejudice against listing individually if GNG not met for some teams. But how about a little  first
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)