Deletion of Associated Student Bodies

Comment: I proded this article because, while some people might find this notable to their specific and small community it is not to the general populace. This is the definition of cruft. The article is even unable to prove that it is |notable to the gay furry community as it has no |reliable sources and so fails |verifiability. This is a non-notable amateur comic book that claims to have a very small niche and it is unable to support an encyclopedic article. The place for this is a personal website or private wiki such as wikifur
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: the problem with this one is localized notability. There are a total of 11,000 ghits for this thing, 90% of them scattered across furry or gay themed websites, blogs, forums, and the like. (Ghit searching is science, young padawan.) There is VERY SLIGHT coverage in a couple of college newspapers but I can't find an online source to link to. Rabbit Valley, at the least, is not exactly self-publishing either. I'm really not sure where to draw the line on this one. Strictly speaking, it fails  and , and it isn't going to pass  by any stretch since I don't think it's listed in any library or has an ISBN number. Sold worldwide (US, UK, Germany). Finally, keep arguments based on the inclusion of other comics do not set a precedent, see  -- we're discussing ASB, not Circles. Circles I've heard of
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:BK||WP:INN)

Comment: Notability has a very straight forward criteria that this article fails to meet. Also notability is '''not''' subjective. Please see the notability policy section #Notability is not subjective|''Notability is not subjective''. In the future it would be helpful if you read the policy guildlines before making any assertions about their contents
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)