Deletion of The Mountain Witch

Comment: summarizing from my Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 November 5|DRV comments) I'm not convinced ''Flames Rising'' is a . The http://www.flamesrising.com/about/ about page describes it as a fanzine. That doesn't (ahem) conjure up visions of strict editorial oversight. The http://www.flamesrising.com/submission-guidelines/, submissions guidelines says, ''we encourage you to submit your content to our site in order to gain exposure and publicity for whatever it is you’re working on.  typically, we only edit reviews for basic spelling and grammar and do not alter your written content.''They also allow the review author to retain copyright, and don't pay for reviews.  These are not the sorts of things which scream out .  They do provide some editorial oversight; they describe the types of content they want to publish, and reserve the right to reject items that don't fit their needs. So, not a totally anything-goes, hands-off  blog. But, on the spectrum of reliable-sourcitude, more on the bloggy end of the spectrum and not something to base a WP:GNG claim on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:UGC)