Deletion of Tabrez Ansari lynching

Comment: meets  and  as has been covered by numerous state, national, and international |independent sources over a period of time. in addition to those listed by editors above, there is from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-25/muslim-mans-lynching-death-in-india-captured-on-viral-video/11244552 "Muslim man dies after being beaten for hours, forced to chant Hindu slogans" that ties this in with the apparent increase in religious intolerance/violence in India since the 2014 election, and from NDTV https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jharkhand-assembly-polls-2019-jharkhand-not-lynchistan-chief-minister-counters-opposition-tag-2135989 ""Jharkhand Not Lynchistan": Chief Minister Counters Opposition Tag" that discusses the state political machinations related to this death
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT||WP:RS)

Comment: Per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: per . There's good coverage, and not just from July. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-48882053https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/tabrez-ansari-lynching-police-drop-murder-charges-against-11-citing-autopsy-report-1597490-2019-09-10https://www.telegraphindia.com/states/jharkhand/the-ravages-of-hunger-anger-in-jharkhand/cid/1717623https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/land-of-blood-and-shame/article29301014.ecehttps://thewire.in/rights/the-crisis-of-witnessing. More in the article. Article can be improved, but that is no reason for deletion.  applies per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:BDP)

Comment: plainly notable based on |significant and ongoing coverage of the lynching and murder, and equally plainly not |propaganda as we define it based on PM Modi (a known Hindu nationalist) speaking in parliament about it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SOAP)

Comment: This incident was heavily reported by media and still any case proceedings gets duly reported by media. This incident was most talked and one of the most brutal and merciless incident which has it's own place. As per , it can be allowed on wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: easily passes our  criteria with the amount of international coverage recieved. The links posted above and in the article are sufficient to demonstrate notability hence I am not reposting the same
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)