Deletion of Enforcement (2nd nomination)

Comment: with Notecardforfree's rewrite and per . Nice work! Their rewrite shows that enforcement is a notable topic per  through the use of multiple reliable sources and the rewrite gets rid of the gibberish problem. Reverting a solidly referenced rewrite to an unreferenced stub just because it complicates a disambiguation exercise is...a case misplaced priorities. At WP, verifiable article content is king and any DAB work or title changes can be accomplished through discussion and consensus after the close
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG)

Comment: per the rewrite. Not sure if this topic is the |primary topic for the term "enforcement", but that's a matter for . Either way, this definitely seems like a notable topic worthy to be in an encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:PRIMARYTOPIC||WP:RM)

Comment: I just did a complete re-write of this article per . "Enforcement" is an important subject in legal jurisprudence, and it has been the subject of extensive discussion in legal scholarship. {{u|Dicklyon}}, {{u|Neiltonks}}, {{u|RickinBaltimore}}, can you please take a look at the new version of the article and let me know what you think? I hope you will consider changing your votes now that the article has been improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)