Deletion of Michael Gilchrist

Comment: per . That's why  overrides , so that genuinely notable junior athletes like this guy don't get excluded on the basis of arbitrary criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ATH)

Comment: I frequently read a comment that someone "meets ", but it consists of two sentences and a footnote, and I can't see what part of it is applicable here.  Persons who are inherently notable under that rule are: "People who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, golf or tennis.8  People who have competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships."  The 8 footnote adds "Participation in and, in most cases, winning individual tournaments, except the most prestigious events, does not make non-athletic competitors notable. This includes, but is not limited to, poker, bridge, chess, Magic:The Gathering, Starcraft, etc."  Which part of  does this person qualify under
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: per the significant coverage in |reliable sources. The sources provided by {{user|Glenfarclas}} demonstrate that  is met. Since  supersedes , this article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Unless  is someday updated to allow notability for well-known high school athletes. For now he just doesn't pass the criteria by definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: WP:ATHLETE isn't the whole story—a person may still meet  to be notable.  I admit it seems very early to have an article on this kid, and I'm generally the first to nominate articles about school-age athletes who are supposedly going to be the next big thing.  However, I think I'm pretty much swayed by coverage at http://insider.espn.go.com/ncb/recruiting/tracker/player?recruitId=54118&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f ESPN, the http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-165975959/he-got-game-13.html Philadelphia Inquirer, and a variety of other places Google News will show you.  I can't go with a full-on "keep" recommendation though because to the extent he's currently notable it's still only because of his future prospects, and, in my mind at least, for encyclopedic purposes that's not the same as being notable for current or past deeds
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:ATHLETE is supplemental and does not replace .  The coverage in reliabel sources is sufficient to establish notability, as multiple independent reliable sources have taken note of this individual
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)