Deletion of Michael Rivero

Comment: This one looks like he could be worthy of inclusion, but finding reliable sources is complicated by the multitude of conspiracy references out there. If he were to meet  standards, it would more likely be for his industry work which, as is currently written in the article, is close but not quite enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: no assertion of notability, no major media attention, grossly undersourced and difficult to find |reliable sources beyond the echo chamber of conspiracy theory blogs. Most assuredly does ''not'' conform to , nor does his website merit a mention under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO||WP:WEB)

Comment: Coverage is trivial, would be nearly impossible to write a  compliant article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Meets .  Badly written pages should be rewritten; not deleted.  This guy has been notable among conspiracy whackos for years -- the following cites are listed on the talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: NN. If notability is to be based upon his special effects work, then I would expect that the bulk of the article would be about that aspect of his life, with only a passing mention of his conspiracy work. In this case, it would seem that his day job would be used as an excuse to push non-notable conspiracy theories and POV, violating the spirit and intent of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom.  Violates Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement and doesn't cite |reliable sources, unless you consider whatreallyhappened.com, 911myths.com and sicmuse.com as reliable (which they aren't under ).  Be prepared for the whatreallyhappened.com meatpuppet Anschlüss
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: This entry meets . Michael Rivero has "A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following." A search on his name in quotes in google produces 111,000 entries. A search on whatreallyhappened.com, his site, produces 335,000 entires. Whether you agree with his views or those who share them is irrelevant. He is definitely notable enough to be included in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: non notable individual, fails to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)