Deletion of Celliant

Comment: The one published, company-funded, clinical trial (PMID 19386127) that was cited in the article was deleted because it was not compliant with . Furthermore, it did not include any measure of oxygenation. If improved oxygenation is the proposed mechanism, there was no supporting evidence, only speculation. The company website describes other clinical trials, but those have not yet been published in peer-reviewed journals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: I feel a bit out of my depth here with my spam-fighting hat. The article currently looks promotional, but Google Scholar does show some research mentioning this... substance. Maybe redirect this to the article about the company that holds the patent for this, where it can be covered in the section for their products, assuming the company itself passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: Wikipedia is not an advertising platform, no matter how much this company wants it to be. No evidence of passing  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG)