Deletion of Imani Hakim

Comment: The  or not, the fact remains that after being listed for two weeks nothing has been added to the article with regard to sourcing, and the article is, as mentioned, essentailly a UBLP at this point. The fact that no sources have been added to the article in two weeks indicates that none of the "sheer mass of coverage" rises to the level of "substanstial coverage" in |reliable sources and thus this should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS||WP:RS)

Comment: Being one of the stars of a national hit TV series that lasted four seasons in itself demonstrates notability ( would have applied ''before'' the series).  While there doesn't seem a specific piece that goes very in-depth on this person the https://www.google.com/#q=Imani+Hakim&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=KY3tUffjE8qCygGC24CwBw&ved=0CB4QpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.49478099,d.aWM&fp=7672d36b760d511f&biw=1177&bih=787 sheer large mass of coverage that has been given to this person in combination passes  ("The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)