Deletion of Joe Klein's 21st November 2007 Time magazine column

Comment: Nbahn as per comments on the talk page of Joe Klein I greatly admire your effort on this but the level of detail here is both not suitable and not notable enough for an encyclopedia. The few sentances on the Joe Klien article are enough to learn about the controversy. This article belongs in a political blog and although you have referenced it, it is mainly a list of links to different blogs. I am sorry but delete. Perhaps if you can get this to a few neat paragraphs of prose, with correct reference styling - see eferences then  maybe you might be able to swing me. But for now this article shouldnt be on WP. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: This is not an encyclopedia article, it's a collection of links, which we are #DIR|emphatically not. This is like a technorati search so that someone has a handy reference page for all the big or semi-big bloggers who have at one time made a comment on the topic. It's definitely #Undue weight for a subject which can be adequately covered in about a paragraph. Even if it's the worst boner Klein ever committed to public view, it's not deserving an article of its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per |Wikipedia is not a soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Time is a major magazine.  All of its articles will receive close scrutiny and this one is no different.  Article violates , , and POV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR||WP:NPOV)