Deletion of Donald Trump speech to joint session of Congress, February 2017

Comment: as above, not noteworthy  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING)

Comment: Meets , clearly. Even nominator admits that. It's equivalent to a State of the Union, which are notable. What argument is for deletion other than 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: essentially per the nominator's rationale. Everything Trump says or writes is subjected to extensive fact-checking and Democratic heckling, and since these responses comprise nearly the entire article's content, there's no evidence of significance or lasting impact here. The fact that commentary "faded out within the week" strengthens the , I would think
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Wikipedia considers the '''enduring notability of persons and events''' ( point 2). WIth this subject, it received lots of publicity at the time of the address, as was to be expected. But '''Most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion''', as there is no lasting coverage. I can find no articles, 3 months on, focusing on this speech or anything hinting at how this speech has shaped Trump's presidency. As such, it fails , and I can't see any particular reason why |this would be a special case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:IAR)

Comment: Speech received unusually positive reception, and is thus more than mere . Also, I honestly think we ''should'' have more articles on political speeches.&nbsp;'''&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)