Deletion of Crackle (physics) (3rd nomination)

Comment: This discussion was not created with the right template and was never transcluded to a daily log.  Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time.  {{ping|Andros 1337}} For future nominations, please fully follow the procedure at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: both articles to Jounce, or possibly Snap, Crackle and Pop#Physics. Lots of notable physics terms are jokes: quark, strange, charm, barn, qubit, anyon, ... the question is whether these terms are in use. The 8 sources above show that both crackle and pop are used across the fields of physics, human motion, control theory, and finance. None of the mentions are in enough depth to justify standalone articles, but both are verifiable across multiple independent reliable sources. Our policy is to  verifiable content when we can, and in this case merge is an obvious |alternative to deletion. As the next derivatives in the series beyond jounce/snap, it makes sense to put in a section with their definitions and a few examples of use in that article--in fact they are already mentioned there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)