Deletion of Basic Economics

Comment: in having multiple reviews, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: and rewrite. I see the concerns about  but it seems to be something that could be fixed with some clean-up without deleting the entire article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I know it technically passes NBOOK as written--so does every published textbook, for they all get reviewed--and Kirkus will review essentially anything.  The question is  the total failure of NPOV, which is a much more basic principle that the guideline on notability.  --is this a textbook on economics, or a textbook on free market economics? What do the reviews actually say in that respect? Is there any actual information here that can't be justified by a line in his article? And if it's his most famous book, what justifies the articles on his other books.? (but at least those articles at least give a hint in describing the contents that the book is from a particular perspective. I think the term for this entire group of article is alled garden
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)