Deletion of Plinko (3rd nomination)

Comment: The references that have been added since the article was nominated for deletion do not address criteria in . The links are barely a trivial mention of the game itself. The first (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=4734676&page=1) contains two lines about general game play that is part of an overall description for an "online experience." The second, ''(Mostly) True Stories'' by John Nemo http://books.google.com/books?id=grH0kyDOK4wC&pg=PA160&lpg=PA160&dq=mostly+true+stories+john+nemo&source=bl&ots=mXO6RaNtDE&sig=3Uj0rn_g1UbFmLRdfHPtrbge8SE&hl=en&ei=ErxnTsimF6vHsQKfk8SUDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFwQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=mostly%20true%20stories%20john%20nemo&f=false, provides a description of the game play and uses the random aspects and possible outcomes within the game as an analogy to random events in one's life related to family and relationships. The subject of the book or point of the work is not about Plinko—it's about the unpredictability of life events. Using this source to establish notability would be similar to using a trivial mention of a television show if it appears briefly in a movie (e.g., Bill Murray memorizing ''Jeopardy!'' clues in ''Groundhog Day (film)|Groundhog Day'' would not be an applicable source to meet  for ''Jeopardy!''). The point of  is not to create a collection of random anecdotal mentions of a topic. The point is to show that the topic itself has been found in reliable sources with '''significant coverage'''. Sottolacqua
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)