Deletion of Killing of Lee Pomeroy

Comment: This looks like it could be on the local news station, Wikipedia is |not a newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . Tragic though it is, there doesn't appear to be anything extraordinary about this crime that makes it sufficiently notable for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per  - as we have  national (and international) coverage persisting from the date of the event to present (e.g. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-46815058 BBC on 9 Jan https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lee-pomeroy-father-killed-on-train-was-stabbed-nine-times-txt9drz68 The Times on 8 Jan). public killings do not fall within , as they are not routine events. The crime ticks all of the boxes for / - with the possible exception of continuing future coverage (which without a crystal ball, we can not ascertain at this date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG||WP:NCRIME)

Comment: This is pretty much a textbook case of , so there is no need to question Laurenb97x's status to determine that this should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and per {{u|StraussInTheHouse
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Just to clarify, I opened this discussion because a speedy deletion tag added by another user was removed. I feel though this is a case of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:SPEEDY)

Comment: Fails  and NOTNEWS, but does not qualify for SPEEDY
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: Fails ,  and . See also , of which this a text book example
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING||WP:10YT||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Yet another article on a crime created way too soon before any |lasting impact could possibly be established. Missing the point of |Wikipedia is not a newspaper—a core policy—is not the fault of the editors who nominate these articles for deletion; rather, it is the fault of editors who consistently create mirrors of news reports and misconstrue notability guidelines to justify it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: does not meet ; no apparent societal impact or long-lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: per . As excellently and eloquently explained in ''The Sun'' on Wednesday https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8158938/abuse-mp-soubry-blame-mcdonnell/, the length of the news cycle doesn't matter. If a black victim gains 7 days of coverage and nothing after that, we delete. If a white victim gains 14 days of coverage and nothing after that, we still delete. That's per policy, see the fourth sentence in #NEWSREPORTS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS)