Deletion of Guayakí (company)

Comment: I was the one who removed the PROD and added multiple RSes to the talk page to support. http://www.newsweek.com/small-biz-makeover-guayaki-teas-big-challenge-76809 https://www.bevnet.com/news/2018/outside-investment-fuels-vertical-growth-guayaki http://rsfsocialfinance.org/2012/08/27/guayaki-pioneers/ https://www.100yearsofsun.com/single-post/2016/07/03/Guayak%C3%AD-Yerba-Mate-MarketDriven-Regenerative-Agriculture-at-the-Base-of-the-Pyramid https://magazine.calpoly.edu/spring-summer-2018/cultivating-change-guayaki-21-years-later/ https://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/blog/guayak%C3%AD http://kwhs.wharton.upenn.edu/2013/03/restoring-the-rainforest-guayaki-brews-environmental-and-social-change/ We do not usually delete poorly written articles, we delete non-notable subjects and the sources support the subject's notability. Perhaps the nominator could do  instead of creating unnecessary deletion discussions. I'm quite close to suggesting either a topic ban from nominating for deletion for the nominator, but will let the closing admin decide
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (:WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Not sure if G5 applies so I am judging this on notability alone. Add http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1920302,00.html this from Time Magazine to the reference as it meets . The http://www.newsweek.com/small-biz-makeover-guayaki-teas-big-challenge-76809 Newsweek article seems like routine coverage based on the title, but it is very detailed and in-depth about the company. Both Time and Newsweek are reliable sources so  is met IMHO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORG)