Deletion of Amazon Prime Pantry

Comment: I agree with Tim above: it doesn't matter that the service is discontinued; if it's a notable business (which I believe this is), it should be part of the collective information record. I am not aware of any policy stating companies/services that have been discontinued should have their articles deleted. Per a  search, the following are references not currently used on the page: https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/amazon-shutters-prime-pantry-an-early-online-grocery-initiative/ The Seattle Times, https://progressivegrocer.com/amazon-prime-pantry-phased-out Progressive Grocer, https://retailwire.com/discussion/did-amazon-pantry-outlive-its-usefulness/ Retail Wire, https://www.mashed.com/312617/amazon-is-canceling-its-pantry-service-heres-what-you-need-to-know/ Mashed, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/19/amazon-prime-pantry-temporarily-closes-due-to-coronavirus-demand.html CNBC, https://www.cnet.com/how-to/amazons-online-grocery-order-options-compared-prime-vs-fresh-vs-whole-foods/ CNET, https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/difference-amazon-fresh-amazon-pantry Fox News, and myriad others
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: to Amazon Prime#Prime Pantry, which appears to already duplicate the content of this article, word for word, including all sources. While I agree that the nomination did not provide a valid reason for straight Deletion, there is also no reason to have a duplicative article, especially when the content is not extensive enough to justify it being  from the main topic
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)