Deletion of List of bus routes in Ipswich & Woodbridge

Comment: Fails , , . There seems to be a fundamental failure by some editors here to understand the purpose and nature of Wikipedia. It is a tertiary source drawing information from secondary sources. It is not intended to be a guide or directory. Articles should not be based entirely or almost entirely on primary sources. People are better going to the bus companies or local authorities websites for travel information where it is likely to be up to date. There can never be any certainty that a Wiki page is not out of date or vandalised when it is accessed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: Fails , , . Who will look on Wikipedia for bus routes, they would go to traveline. I doubt it will even survive on wika where I edit. Anyway they aren't notable as Huntingdon, Stowmarket, Ely and Harleston  pages showed us. Special:Contributions/81.135.53.219|81.135.53.219
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: WP:NOTDIR, ,  #8. Just because some information is useful to some people is no reason to put it in an encyclopedia. The bus company should have a web page with this list, which the bus company is responsible for keeping up to date. By providing a list of bus routes or bus schedules, we're doing readers a disservice: duplicating authoritative information that is provided elsewhere, possibly providing outdated information. Wikipedia usually appears first in search results, so our providing this list actually interferes with the reader's access to the authoritative source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:NOTEVERYTHING)