Deletion of List of LGBT Jews (3rd nomination)

Comment: per my arguments above. I just noticed that I didn't give a !vote above, so here it is. In the spirit of  the list should be confined to notable people who verifiably identify themselves as both Jewish and LGBT, but that is a content, rather than an existential issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: as this list topic fails #DIR as it does not have a definition in accordance #List content without which it is just istcruft|listcruft without any externally validated rationale for inclusion in Wikipedia. A list needs some form of external validation in accordance with  to demonstrate that it is not entirely novel or the product of |synthesis, and looking at the content of this list, its lack of souring that suggest it is ''entirely'' made up of unrelated topics stitched together to create an entirely novel list topic that has never been published before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LISTS||WP:L||WP:BURDEN||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per .  It's not overly specific, as the length of the list demonstrates.  Every entry on the list needs to comply with the  policies on sourcing, and every entry needs to be notable BOTH for being Jewish AND for being LGBT, but those are both issues for regular editing.  There's no inherent problem with the topic itself, other than it creates an article that's going to be a b***h to maintain and protect from vandalism, and sadly that's not a policy-supported reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:BLP)

Comment: per . This is just that, a case study of Factor A (religion) to Factor B (sexual orientation). Try putting together lists of every religion in the world to every sexual orientation, and see what you get
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCASE)