Deletion of Throat Gaggers

Comment: because no evidence of notability is given, and the article appears to fail ,  and  - the trifecta of Wikipedia policies.  Please note that improving the article is the only way to remedy this problem, however, I highly doubt that it is possible to improve it sufficiently
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:CITE)

Comment: I AM NOT the head of the pornographic company that makes these films.  In addition, the "Notability" guidlines  alluded to above is just an ''essay'' not a policy, and furthermore these films are notable anyway, you will see when its kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: And did you read , which is not an essay, but policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Because many TV shows have articles for their episodes, the current  policy sets itself up for a serious violation of  because of the precedent that would be established here if this content is deleted (some of which has been recognized as top-500 by a retail website). Just something to think about; some here seem to be applying policy more forcefully to this article than they would elsewhere; Wikipedia is  censored
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:POINT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Doesn't seem |notable enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)