Deletion of A History of the Palestinian People

Comment: Nom hasn't even bothered to cite an actual single policy in bringing this Afd. Article uses 38 separate references. Easily fulfills 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per ; essentially, an unremarkable prank which has been done before. No societal impact or long-term significance; just 15 minutes of fame
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Passes . cannot be applied here as it not an an event and even if we apply it it should be kept per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEWS||WP:RAPID)

Comment: because sourcing suffices to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I had been considering nominating this article for deletion myself but might as well comment here instead. While the nominator has not given a valid reason for deletion, (nominator has since updated nomination with valid criteria)  I think there are applicable policies. Firstly, this is a self published book and per , "Self-publication and/or publication by a vanity press do not correlate with notability". Secondly, per , Wikipedia articles should be on topics with "enduring notability" and per , "Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability". That this book has already been delisted by the world's two largest online booksellers only a few days after going on sale speaks volumes about its lack of enduring notability. That the book has also been described as a racist prank is another reason not to reward it with an article here. It's basically nothing more than a blip in the news cycle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: If I were to support deletion, I'd cite . But Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humayun Khan (soldier)|Wikipedia rejects that argument when it wants to. If I were to support a keep outcome, I'd point to . I wish {{u|Huldra}} would have made a competent nomination. Her mistake is probably going to result in a keep outcome
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: This book might be the same joke as done before but this one got big press and definitely meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)