Deletion of List of General Slocum victims (2nd nomination)

Comment: as per #DIR, as per no one on the list is notable, and um ..... and consensus was already for deletion, without any improvement on this list from the previous.  I'll even go one further that this should be Wikipedia:Snowball clause|WP:snowball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per #DIR. It is incorrect to claim that Wikipedia policy for keeping all victim lists is established by the two precedents cited. Mentioning the number and general characteristics of the victims suffices for historical purposes. A telephone-book like list of names serves no purpose. Millions of people died in airplane crashes, plagues, wars, steamboat explosions, famines, typhoons, earthquakes, and other mass casualty events. Most such lists of dead people have been deleted in AFDs.  For the Virginia Tech victim list, the summary on the article's talk page says "The result of the discussion was Keep - No Consensus for deletion" The Columbine article AFD summary on the article's talk page says "This article was nominated for deletion on 18/4/2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus." It takes more than "No consensus" to establish a policy of keeping victim lists for otherwise non-notable people who were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Perhaps such victim lists could be trans-wikied to Wikisource. Then descendants of the unfortunate dead could have the pleasure of looking up their ancestors. But Wikipedia is not a genealogical database of non-notable people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I can only guess (having not been involved in that AfD), that the Va Tech, and even the Titanic list is there because at least some of the individuals involved are notable, and have Wikipedia articles.  Even Columbine has a few articles on individuals.  Admittadly, some of that is sstrictly because those events were heavily covered by the modern news media, while the Slocumb was covered, though individual stories were either not likely as covered, or those stories have been buried by time.  In any event, the only notable people on the Slocumb list are the two survivors.  The list of the dead, tragedy that it was, was not a list of notable people as per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)