Deletion of Old Town Canoe

Comment: The current article may lack sufficient references, but this is an established and well-known company that easily passes .  In particular, note this from  policy: "A primary test of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the company, corporation, product or service notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial, non-routine works that focus upon it."  In the case of Old Towne Canoe, consider these published works
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Per Crunch. This company passes  because it is old and well-mentioned in both newspaper and books. In additions, the referenced phrase "Old Town is the largest and best known American canoe manufacturer" alone should be more than enough for establishing this article's notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Has anybody actually looked for sources? A quick search using Google news uncovered over 600 hits, mostly from New England-based newspapers (not just Bangor, Maine) with a few from other areas. It's also been profiled on national media such as https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1054939 NPR and the Discovery Channel. The company is over 100 years old, and I consistently see it referred to as one of the "iconic companies" of Maine (http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/News/StateNewEngland/428035-227/governor-visits-maine-canoe-plant.html example here). Clearly, it meets , and I'm surprised that it was nominated for deletion at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)