Deletion of Cherita

Comment: I just found this. Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/Archive_12#Cherita.2Fwikilink. Seems like others agreed that it was  way back in 2009 as well when our standards were much lower
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Wikipedia requires reliable ''secondary'' sources to prove that the poetry form is popular. And this requires significant coverage. Poetry forms are invented daily. What sets a poetry form apart from the others is if it has been adopted by others and reliable sources are talking about it. At the moment, I don't see significant coverage. A brief mention in Frog Pond is all I can see - and the rest seems to be references linked to one particular poet which I doubt are independent and secondary. Previous AfDs on made-up poetic forms have resulted in deletions - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udaiyaathathu and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liwuli. At the moment, I don't see enough about the poetry form to keep this article. I'm also concerned that keeping articles like these in Wikipedia is possibly an attempt to increase the usage of these forms;  applies here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: virtually everything I see as added references refer to this form being "created in 1997 by American poet Ai Li." I daresay  applies. Not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NOTMADEUP)