Deletion of Nintendo Australia (2nd nomination)

Comment: Seems to me to have sufficient of a life of its own in Australia and Oceania to have its own article.  Seems to have sufficient  to claim GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: or '''Merge''' to Nintendo. No evidence of independent notability, appears to fail . Arguing keep with a rationale of  requires some proof. Anyone can CLAIM there's sources. Where are they? The existing sourcing isn't good enough, but if you have found something better, please share
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Per the notability guidelines laid out in . "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability."  That seems clearly to have been done here.  The article has obviously demonstrated that the sources available make it "possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub."  While many of these multiple sources might not be extremely in-depth, they are non-trivial, in that they go beyond the level of the examples of trivial content listed in the guideline linked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)