Deletion of As I Am (Kristin Chenoweth album)

Comment: I would tend to agree that this meet  #1. There is non-trival coverage in ''The Buffalo News'', ''The Ledger'', Allmusic, as well as ''Detroit News''. I don't have full-text access to that last one, but its particulars are: Henrickson, Eric (April 15, 2005). "Kristin Chenoweth, ''As I Am'' (Sony Classical)", ''Detroit News'', p. E7. Furthermore, the crosswalk.com article was also published in print as Cumbee, Jim (June 2005). "In Review: Music – Kristin Chenoweth: As I Am", ''CCM Magazine'' '''27''' (12): 66
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)

Comment: It would need to chart in the right kind of chart, and I'm not convinced on this one (but it's not an area I'm well-versed in). TO meet  it also needs more than just to chart: ''All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the |notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:N)

Comment: A person just added a couple of reviews, from a Buffalo paper and a Florida paper; they're not online but let's assume they're a paragraph long. Then there's the Crosswalk and AllMusic reviews -- longer, but in a more specialized venue. This is probably enough to meet  #1, I think. Then ''Billboard'' has a notice that it opened at #50 on the album charts (whether it went higher I don't know), so that's maybe  #2 (I don't know if "appeared on any country's national music chart" means as low as #50, but for songs it goes down to #100, and the "any country" is America, a particularly populous and wealthy country). All in all I think it meets our album notability standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS||WP:NALBUMS)