Deletion of Estonia–Tunisia relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: Article has no useful content and very little prospect of expansion. All countries want to expand tourism (it's not notable). No sources indicate these relations are notable. Fails |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per everyone above. Bilateral relations, even when well sourced, are not inherently notable. The only notability criteria that enjoy consensus and are applicable to this topic are the |general notability criteria, and these require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. (In other words, coverage on the governments' websites doesn't establish notability, nor do trivial, passing mentions in newspaper articles.) If I'm wrong, I request the closing admin to explain to me why I'm wrong.  I have looked for sources that would establish notability and found none
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: These countries have notable bilateral relations as evidenced by their Co-operation Agreement in the Field of Culture, Education, Research and Sports which has been verified by an independent source (the Mission to Estonia from Egypt)http://testemb.vm.ee/news/aid-1117 here. The first discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonia–Tunisia relations|here made that abundantly clear, and in my opinion, should have been a keep. LibStar's subjective opinion that a bilateral treaty is "minor" in insufficient to overcome wikipedia's policy regarding the otability of subject matter. That policy is as follows
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)