Deletion of Simon Chesterman

Comment: I think, despite the COI, that he does pass #C1 (the journal editorship probably isn't good enough for #C8, and I don't think his awards pass the bar either, but only one criterion is needed). I just made a pass over the article cleaning out some of the worst of the puffery there. If the subject continues to edit in the same manner, user sanctions may be warranted, but I don't think we should let user misbehavior guide whether we keep or don't keep article content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes rof#C1 with a GS h-index of 19
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: The subject fails . He is clearly a very intelligent person, but so are 90% of professors in the Times Higher Education Top 100 Universities. In addition, the article cites mainly the subject's own works, and serves as a list of summaries of those works. This is not a neutral biography but a promotional piece. A search on Google brings up very few Wikipedia:Third-party sources|third-party sources which could help build a biography anyway (not that Google is a rock-solid measure of notability; it's at least a good indicator in this case).&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)