Deletion of Algorithms (journal)

Comment: indexed in Scopus and both zbMATH and MathSciNet, and it's https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Algorithms%22+MDPI&btnG= reasonably cited so that passes . MDPI is certainly a questionable publisher, but they're no OMICS Publishing Group. All in all, we're better off with this article than without
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALS)

Comment: I don't think our unsubstantiated opinions about the quality of review at this journal are worth much as a reason for deletion. (In my own case, I know nothing about its standards for peer review, but I am troubled by the fact that, although it occasionally publishes work by reputable researchers, the vast majority of the papers published in this journal are not on what I recognize as the design and analysis of algorithms.) But as the only real notability guideline for journal notability is  (ournals is suggestive but not definitive), and no in-depth independently published sources are evident, we have no basis for keeping the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NJ)