Deletion of Jana Jordan

Comment: The pony theory, made popular by Ronald Reagan, refers to someone so determined to see the result they want that they fail to see basic facts. His paradigm was the child who, presented with a giant pile of horse manure, dived into it excitedly, proclaiming that with that much horse manure around, there had to be a pony in it somewhere.http://books.google.com/books?id=U3G0RJUqITUC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=reagan+poney+manure&source=bl&ots=ZHpe6v8xgr&sig=wM9L_uMtdvPCFL3S37tYejmBEAo&hl=en&ei=wmQdTO3JJ8GC8gbSmITODA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q&f=false Neither Xbiz nor AVN pages typically meet  requirements; the great majority of them are press releases (not always acknowledged as such) or promotional pieces assembled from PR presskits.  Most of the remaining coverage that you cite simply includes the performer's name in passing in a castlist or laundry list. The GNG isn't satisfied by trivial coverage, nor nonindependent promo pieces.  It requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," which does not include "works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc." You say there's a pony in there? Identify and cite the sources you say support notability. Otherwise you're just pointing to a pile of manure
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)