Deletion of Underworld IV

Comment: to Underworld (film series)#Fourth film  The film's prospects have received quite a bit of coverage.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Underworld+4%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Underworld+4%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go  Per , it |'''''is''''' appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur.  Since the article is curently not huge in size, its being merged will not overburden the parent article at Underworld (film series), and for such smaller stubs, such a merge is recommended by 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CBALL||WP:NFF)