Deletion of Robert Duncan (physicist)

Comment: I couldn't find anything on google scholar. also fails , no significant coverage http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?um=1&ned=au&hl=en&q=%22robert+duncan%22+%22university+of+missouri%22&cf=all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  now. Good work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: the combination of a strong  combined with the 60 Minutes piece creates a strong enough case to justify inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: By going through http://munews.missouri.edu/news-releases/2008/0619-mu-provost-announces-vice-chancellor-for-research.php this primary source, he appears to pass . Also, http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v61/i7/p846_1 this is one of his papers which appeared in Phys. Rev. Lett. His author abbreviation seems to be R. V. Duncan
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The article now clearly shows that he passes  #3, #5, and possibly #7, and doesn't give unbalanced weight to his cold fusion work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: His contribution to the field of "Low Temperature Physics" as seen from the number of publications (as key author) in http://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?num=100&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&sa=G&oi=qs&q=%22rv+duncan%22+author:r-duncan Google scholar is sufficient to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Switched !vote. It is now clear from the discussion that the subject does, indeed, pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: IMHO, the purported agenda(s) of the nominator and/or any !voter is completely |irrelevant to the discussion of ''any'' article deletion. Deletion discussions and decisions should based only on the merits of the article and not the editors involved. Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:ADHOM)