Deletion of Real life (2nd nomination)

Comment: In addition to what others have said, I just don't think the problems listed in the nom are sufficient to delete. There are tons of books out there about internet culture, and copyediting is easy. Notability, you cannot improve, but this article can be improved, and it is clearly |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: In addition to what others have said, I just don't think the problems listed in the nom are sufficient to delete. There are tons of books out there about internet culture, and copyediting is easy. Notability, you cannot improve, but this article can be improved, and it is clearly |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per excellent rationale by Mr.IP. The reality article is no place for this topic, which concerns a term used to distinguish mediated experience from non-mediated (compare meatspace). It only takes a minute of research to discover that this topic is notable; see for example Jansen et al. (2000) "Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web ",  Rasmussen and Jensen (1974) "Mental Procedures in Real-Life Tasks: A Case Study of Electronic Trouble Shooting", Byrne et al. (1970) Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating.",  Funk et al. (2004) "Violence exposure in real-life, video games, television, movies, and the internet", Bensley et al. (2001) "Video games and real-life aggression". I could go on. How anyone could conclude that this topic fails to meet the |general notability guideline is beyond me. It appears that those looking to delete or redirect the article have neglected to do any research and have focussed mistakenly on the article's |current, rather than potential state
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POTENTIAL)