Deletion of Krishna Kasaraneni

Comment: Fails ; I could find no publications at all at Google Scholar. Fails  because being named one of the top 50 physicians in a given field by a magazine does not amount to a "well known or significant or award or honor"; magazines publish such lists all the time. Fails  for lack of significant coverage by reliable sources; he is mentioned in the Pulse Magazine top-50 list, which got a little bit of press (BTW the Economic Times article and the Deccan Herald article cited above are the same article), but nothing close to |significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Basically he appears to be a successful, well-regarded physician in general practice; that's not enough for inclusion in an international encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:42)

Comment: Not sure if he exactly meets the  guidelines but he is not far off and anyway meets my guidelines. http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/article-content/-/article_display_list/14544146/36-dr-krishna-kasaraneni Here is a more detailed article from Pulse. Note: after I looked at the Pulse article two or three times I was blocked until I could log in there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as having insufficient in-dpeth coverage in independent third party sources to meet . If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)