Deletion of Denise A. Rangel Tracy

Comment: As I already wrote at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Denise A. Rangel Tracy, I think the service award is the only case for notability here. But I don't think it's enough for #C2, mainly because I don't think service awards in general convey the "academic prestige" asked for by that criterion, but also because it's a bit unselective (they've handed out 31 of these awards since they started 7 years ago https://awm-math.org/awards/awm-service-award/) and because AWM is smaller than several other national-level mathematics organizations so its awards carry less weight. The other  criteria are clearly out of reach, so we would have to go for general rather than academic notability, and hope that it's for more than just one thing, but the article makes no case for that either. It's a shame, because I want to encourage the creation of more articles on women mathematicians, but the creators of such articles should be encouraged to understand our criteria for notability and to target subjects that clearly meet them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I take the awards for  C2 (similarly to C3, C5) as being generally supposed to demonstrate that C1 (or C4, or possibly something like C6) has been met.  A service-specific award is unlikely to do that, and I agree with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Were it not for the AWM Service Award, I'd be a straightforward delete as I think it's  for notability under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NPROF)