Deletion of Kostyantyn Chyzhyk

Comment: Civil servants at the "deputy minister" level can certainly qualify for Wikipedia articles if they're properly referenced to sufficient |reliable source coverage about them in media to clear , but are not handed any automatic notability freebies just because it's technically verifiable that they exist. But this is written like a résumé, not like an encyclopedia article, and the references aren't getting him over GNG — out of six footnotes, four |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, like a press release from his own employer and a newspaper piece where he's the ''bylined author'' of the content and not its ''subject'' and two YouTube videos. And the only two sources that are to real media just glancingly mention his name in the process of ''not'' being substantively ''about him'', which means they aren't getting him over the bar by themselves either if they're the ''only'' reliable sources in play
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: WP:DINC|in spite of the article quality) as an outright  pass, and  states that {{tq|Sub-cabinet officials ... are usually considered notable, especially if they have had otherwise notable careers}}. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavlo Moroz|Besides, we just voted to keep a similar article from this country last month, and notability tends to be different between Wikipedias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES)