Deletion of John Street (Toronto) (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  #1: ''fails to advance an argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: Original merge was correct, but there's clearly enough new content and coverage to justify retention now. Significant coverage in http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/651939 at http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/JOHN+STREET+REDUX/4148914/story.html least http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/extreme-makeover-for-john-st/article1183239/ three reliable sources makes this road easily notable under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)