Deletion of TRANSFER Act of 2013

Comment: The article is not TOOSOON because it is |verifiable in the following |independent secondary reliable sources.http://vabio.org/hemoshear-co-founder-testifies-on-tech-transfer-at-congressional-hearing/http://www.fuentek.com/blog/2013/07/worth-reading-2013-07/http://www.rhodes.edu/news/26704.asp There is no reason to doubt the veracity of the existence of this bill. The fact that many unratified bills don't have articles isn't a reason not to have an article-- many unratified bills ''should'' have articles. This may be one of them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Article has almost nothing by way of third party sources and fails to meet .  Two of the sources above are from organizations reporting that one of their members gave testimony before the Committee; not independent sources.  The third is someone's blog giving their opinion.  The sources available by way of searching online also yielded much of the same, so unless there are additional sources elsewhere, the subject does not warrant a standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)