Deletion of Douglas DC-7B N836D

Comment: Fails to meet the Wikipedia:Notability_(aircraft)#Individual_aircraft|standard for articles on individual aircraft and, because this aircraft will be used for paying passengers seems just a bit too much like |spam to me. I agree that a brief mention in the "survivors" section of the aircraft type article would be the best place for this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: I entirely agree with Aaron Brenneman's comments above about the three sources used in the article at present. But GNews searches bring up http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/04/28/2190400/miami-springs-man-preserves-historic.html this large piece in the ''Miami Herald'' and http://www.primerahora.com/regresodeavionhistoricodeeasternairlinesrestaurado-506139.html this Spanish-language story in ''Primera Hora (Puerto Rico)|Primera Hora'', which if my very basic Spanish is correct is entirely about the plane (unless anyone reading this knows better). There are a few more behind paywalls (partially viewable http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22N836D%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=9-4mTo7xO4OZhQe04fn6CQ&ved=0CBMQpwUoBQ&biw=1280&bih=799 here). Combined with what's already there, we have more than enough to meet , and since some of these are general newspapers, the stricter essay at Wikipedia:Notability (aircraft) is also met. Amazing what you can find with the right search string
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The two sources are very in-depth and demonstrate passing .  Contrary to the nom's statement, an "enthusiast magazine devoted to airliner aircraft" is in fact a |reliable source  per  and  as it's independent of the topic and has editorial oversight of its content. There's too much sourceable content to be used in the Douglas DC-7 article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:GNG)