Deletion of Lavonne Jayne Adams

Comment: None of the impact indicators that we take as demonstrative of notability are here: no Gnews, no GS citations, very meager book holdings according to WorldCat (e.g. 12 for the http://www.worldcat.org/title/through-the-glorieta-pass/oclc/308177629&referer=brief_results Glorieta Pass, 3 for http://www.worldcat.org/title/everyday-still-life/oclc/42569079&referer=brief_results Everyday Still life, 3 for http://www.worldcat.org/title/in-the-shadow-of-the-mountain/oclc/57185926&referer=brief_results In the Shadow of the Mountain, 1 each for her http://www.worldcat.org/title/gathering-images-nonfiction-fiction-and-poetic-narratives/oclc/26113901&referer=brief_results 2 http://www.worldcat.org/title/counterpoint/oclc/41999214&referer=brief_results theses). This is pretty clear case of having much output, but little impact &ndash; the latter being what is required for "notability" under #1. Uncontroversial delete. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: She's not Native American by the way, Pvujin  - not that that should matter! I can't see how this subject could ever meet the criteria. The article in question was written by a one-time contributor which does ring alarm bells. Anyway, the question is, is the subject notable? I can't find online refs that would support notability, I agree that fails  and  as Ttonyb1 has proposed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE)