Deletion of Priscilla Chan (philanthropist)

Comment: tq|Suggest deletion, not redirect, as her undisambiguated name already redirects to her husband}} – actually the undisambiguated name Priscilla Chan has always been an article about a Hong Kong singer. There's a Talk:Priscilla_Chan#Requested_move_2_December_2015|move request to send that to Priscilla Chan (singer) so that Priscilla Chan could be either a  + 1 typo or a redirect to information about Mark Zuckerberg's wife (whether that's its own article or a subsection of his article). Special:Contributions/210.6.254.106|210.6.254.106
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:TWODABS)

Comment: Absolutely meets . What a nonsense for AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: She is being independently profiled in the press; I'll do a little sourcing.  '''Note''' That Wikipedia has an enormous number of articles about individuals notable for being spouses extremely notable people.  We have whole categories (categorized by state) of political spouses alone. Typical example: Chloe Merrick Reed.  The political spouse does not have to write books, have a significant career or do anything.  He or she just has to be profiled in major media, (think Todd Palin).    gauges notability according to the existence of sources that are reliable, significant, verifiable, etc.  It does not matter what a subject is notable for.  We hashed out similar issues in a recently closed-as-keep AFD on Candy Carson.   Profiles in major media are the gold standard of BPL notability.  Chan has them.  We should make her name direct to this page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)