Deletion of Hozaifa Parhat

Comment: to Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay per #HARMFUL and #KEEP
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:R)

Comment: tl|afd}} is not a vote, as I understand it, you have the authority to discount arguments that are inaccurate, or are counter-policy.  Hofaiza Parhat is one of the most significant Guantanamo captives due to the significant ruling in his DTA appeal.  Nominator claimed there were no secondary sources that supported his notability.  Wrong.  Several books and and scholarly articles devoted page after page to the ruling.  In doing so they provided plenty of biographical details about the man himself.  Two of the contributors above assert that the references to Parhat are only ''"passing mentions"''.  That is true for ''some'' but by no means all of these references.  However, even if, for the sake of argument, all the references for some topic each only touched on that topic in a single paragraph, but each of those single paragraphs covered a different aspect of the topic, added together they would add up to the coverage in depth we expect in an article.   essay warns that instances occur when a small subsection of the project's community chime in, and give the appearance of a consensus, that would not be endorsed by the wider community.  I suggest the apparent consensus here is an instance of that phenomenon
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:LOCALCONSENSUS)

Comment: to Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay. ''That'' subject is ''very'' notable and article-worthy, and the articles on the detainees themselves can be merged and redirected into it, as ''individually'' they do not meet the bar for notability to have individual articles that would, by necessity, essentially duplicate the information in the article about the group, as |they have done nothing else notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay. In news and book searches found multiple passing mentions of the subject but none that would be considered ''significant coverage'' as per . Fails  & . That being said the subject falls under a notable group, a redirect can be left in the articlespace and its |verified content can be merged within that target article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:SOLDIER||WP:V)

Comment: insufficient coverage to be notable under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)