Deletion of 2017 New York City attempted bombing

Comment: per , media coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: per ; there's no chance of this being deleted while it is a breaking news story.  It will be impossible to demonstrate that there will not be lasting coverage for at least two weeks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: Passes |general notability guideline because it has coverage and could result in US policy change. It is indeed {{tq|relevant to the Encyclopedia Have a Merry Christmas
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: a no-brainer. Deep, diverse worldwide coverage, notable per . The duration criterion is too soon to judge, but likely to be long-lasting, as the trial of the suspect will certainly be newsworthy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COVERAGE)

Comment: and revisit in two months time per  nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: Significant International coverage  in |Reliable  Sources in  across all major News outlets worldwide clearly passes  and  the only question arguably is whether it meet  in the long term ,that is tough to say at this point .But as of now it is clearly keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:RAPID||WP:LASTING)

Comment: Per . Considering - http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/11/politics/ny-terror-bomb-family-chain-migration/index.html White House claims Trump's immigration plans could have prevented NYC attack, CNN (family visas policy suggestions by Trump) - this quite possibly might have a LASTING effect if indeed US immigration policy is modified. Since SIGCOV is met, and LASTING is the sole notability concern, RAPID applies -  it is too soon to assess future coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: More then enough sources included for this article to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I figured we would have to have this discussion. In so, I imagine that To say that this is notable gives too much credit to the would be attacker. Considering the lasting effects of this have been minimal in my opinion, and that Notability is not temporary (), I'm going with delete. I know it won't be, though, because we as editors will always favor something with clear sources (and the internet age generally grants that to us). So, maybe we delete this in a year or two, after a second review. I don't really know. Wikipedia's guidelines really need to be updated with topics similar to this one.&#8213
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)