Deletion of Etobicoke Collegiate Institute

Comment: as North American high schools are presumed notable, by precedent here at AfD, and by ''dicta'' of Jimbo Wales: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-November/008266.html Jimbo Wales on high school articles.  This one seems big enough to be in per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I take no stand on this issue, except to note that the above arguement is doubly faulty: First of all, there is no statement that all High Schools are presumed notable.  High Schools face the same burdens of proof as to their notability as do ANY OTHER single subject at Wikipedia.  Secondly, the Jimbo quote provided (and it should be noted that Jimbo's one-off statements never trump consensus.  Jimbo is very important, but his mailing list quotes are not Holy Scripture), does NOT give carte-blanche to create an article on every high school in existence.  Indeed, it argues directly AGAINST that.  The context for this quote from Jimbo is simply that each article is to be adjudged OF ITS OWN MERIT, not in relation to other articles.  All he is saying is that PROPERLY WRITTEN AND REFERENCED articles about high schools should not be deleted EVEN IF crappy articles about high schools SHOULD BE deleted.  It is a statement of the oft-cited arguement , which again, means that you cannot argue the merits of an article in relation to other articles, ONLY in relation to established and accepted guidelines like .  This article does not seem to meet the threshold of  YET, and I would like to see some references provided before I make a decision on how I feel about it, however the above non-arguement does not seem a valid keep defense
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: There does not appear to be a valid reason presented for deletion.  See also: 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Article makes strong claim of notability, above and beyond the consensus on notability for such schools documented at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Article should be improved through regular editing per ; hard to believe there aren't plenty of articles and references to school's activities, accomplishments and alumni
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: per  which is merely precedent and because this one would pass  if it had become a notability guideline, which it did not. Major urban high school age 75+ with numerous notable alumni and athletic championships. Tag for sources, move on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:SCHOOLS)