Deletion of Insects as food

Comment: as , redirecting to Entomophagy, which means the eating of insects, i.e. the use of insects as human food. There is no wedge to be driven between these terms, used indifferently to describe the practice; it is not true that either of the two more particularly means 'cuisine' or '-ism', as both terms cover both those things. Since 1954 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Entomophagy%2CInsects+as+food&case_insensitive=on&year_start=1900&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t4%3B%2CEntomophagy%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Bentomophagy%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BEntomophagy%3B%2Cc0%3B.t4%3B%2CInsects%20as%20food%3B%2Cc0%3B%2Cs0%3B%3Binsects%20as%20food%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BInsects%20as%20Food%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BInsects%20as%20food%3B%2Cc0%3B%3BINSECTS%20AS%20FOOD%3B%2Cc0 they have converged in popularity, reaching roughly equal frequency
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: Another page in this general area is insectivore.  Any merger or restructuring should not involve deletion, per .  Note that the ''OED'' does not recognise ''entomophagy'' and so it is a neologism which is less likely to be understood by readers than a title in plain English like ''insects as food
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: After reading the contested deletion and both articles, I tend to agree with the page creator. They really are two separate topics, albeit related, in the same way that Vegetarian cuisine is distinct from Vegetarianism. The article is well-sourced and the subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)