Deletion of Khalid Butt (cricketer, born 1975)

Comment: Fails ,  and every other notability standard due to lack of any significant coverage – only sources found are wide-ranging databases consisting almost entirely of scorecard data. This failure trumps the trivial pass of NCRIC, which is by consensus one of the weakest/most permissive SNGs, gained by virtue of playing one season for one of the smallest regional associations, which was soon absorbed by a larger neighbour. Consensus has also long established that sports SNGs do not supercede GNG. Redirecting to List of Gujranwala cricketers (or similar) would be an accepted , but no such target exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:ATD)

Comment: Has made 5 FC appearances and 1 List-A appearance, passing him for . I second Lugnuts' comments on the ANI, especially as there seem to be a number of AFD's here again, which was one of the concerns brought up at the ANI
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: easily passes  by dint of having played first class and List A cricket. I strongly disagree with a number of the comments above favouring deletion; in particular, NCRIC is considerably more restrictive than, for example  or . The article clearly needs improvement, but that is trivial to do with a little time, and I'm astonished that so many favour deleting articles which obviously pass notability guidelines over improving them. I'd also note that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Fails . No in-depth coverage. There aren't sufficient source to write a biography, nor will there ever be.  explains we require significant coverage "so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:WHYN)

Comment: while carrying out the  process, which non-English sources were consulted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)