Deletion of Malaysia–Serbia relations

Comment: A bunch of sources covering only a single incident is basically a sign that there's only been a single incident between the countries, so #NEWS applies. As the article is an uncited paragraph its a stub BTW
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Notability easily established |The usual way.  Why a handful of editors think bilateral relations should be held to a much higher standard of inclusion than any other set of articles has not been articulated, that I've seen. http://www.jstor.org/pss/2645328http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/11/3/nation/2441795&sec=nationhttp://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-11/02/content_10296485.htmhttp://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1243BAD99B3DE850&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://news.asiaone.com/print/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Malaysia/Story/A1Story20081102-97783.htmlhttp://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=181419http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v3/news.php?id=368772http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=08&dd=11&nav_id=52625http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=NewsLibrary&p_multi=BBAB&d_place=BBAB&p_theme=newslibrary2&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=12285C34C9B7E270&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePMhttp://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/%20sq/newsbriefs/setimes/newsbriefs/2008/11/02/nb-07http://books.google.ca/books?lr=&id=RqtuAAAAMAAJ&dq=Malaysia+Serbia+Relations&q=Serbia+&pgis=1#search_anchorhttp://www.geocities.com/wanadli@ymail.com/81-ramli-shawal-bosnia.pdf - hopefully this is enough to dispel the charade that this relation is "non-notable" - I can dig up many more sources if the show must go on, however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)