Deletion of Leon Sandcastle

Comment: fictional characters from television commercials can indeed be notable, such as Ronald McDonald.  In this case, if we look at the significant coverage generated from this one commercial, we find widespread discussion in news and blogsphere alike, showing that there is significant interest in the topic.  The coverage goes beyond the NFL and sports world into business and lifestyle news, such as http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/leon-sandcastle-signs-fake-funny-endorsement-deal-under-armour-148515 AdWeek: Leon Sandcastle Signs Fake but Funny Endorsement Deal With Under Armour, http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon/2013/02/05/deion-sanders-leon-sandcastle-andre-dawson-super-bowl-xlvii/1894275/ USA Today: The True Identity of Leon Sandcastle, plus this mention in http://www.gq.com/style/blogs/the-gq-eye/2013/04/style-report-the-nfl-drafts-best-look-was-on-a-300-pound-tackle.html GQ--all reliable sources.  This is a clear pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Paul and his sources. Having coverage from in sources as big as USA Today is a pretty big indicator of meeting the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Whatever the bar is on fictional characters, at the end of the day, it appears to me that he meets , which is in and of itself enough to satisfy notability requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Multiple |reliable sources have been provided. Even if the page can be considered non-notable, a proposed merge template was added to this page to be merged into Deion Sanders a while back, though discussion has never started. It would've been more reasonable to start a merge discussion first than starting the AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)