Deletion of Isaaq genocide

Comment: The nominator has violated  and solicited support for their position to delete the article. This has been reported to the Administrators' noticeboard Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Editor Somajeeste canvassing|link
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Full disclosure I am one of the main contributors to this article. This AfD nomination is completely baseless. One look at the article and the sources it cites makes this very clear. Lumping all killings by the same perpetrator under one article without any regard to  is not of benefit in this encyclopedic platform, merits of every article should be looked at based on Wikipedia's core content policies: ''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list'' as per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: As per Somaajeeste, most reliable sources on the bombardment appear to refer to it as a conflict between the Somalia government and the Isaaq clan-dominated Somali National Movement rebel group; particularly those dating from that actual time period. Also, "Isaaq genocide" has zero Google Ngrams compared to "Somali National Movement" https://www.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Isaaq+genocide%2CSomali+National+Movement&year_start=1975&year_end=2016&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2CSomali%20National%20Movement%3B%2Cc0. This indicates that the latter is indeed the scholarly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: Per above, delete rationale is flawed. Article meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Bias is not a valid rationale for deletion, and AfD is not an avenue to do an end run around substantive discussion aimed at addressing whatever bias there is. See also 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: In accordance with , this article has merit in terms of notability and there is no reason for its deletion. This article possesses a considerable amount of scholarly references as listed above by Kzl55 that clearly indicate that the events that took place against the Isaaq people between 1988 and 1991 constitutes a genocide, and comply with Wikipedia’s notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per significant coverage in reliable sources. {{u|Somajeeste}}'s concerns with the article's content should be discussed on its talk page and changes made if necessary, but we shouldn't be deleting an article because an editor doesn't think that the subject meets the definition of genocide (that's |original research), when there are reliable sources calling it a genocide
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)