Deletion of Richard William Paul

Comment: there are ''zero'' secondary sources in the article, so he'd fail  and .  He's ''not'' cited widely in the leading undergraduate textbooks. (See: John Chaffee, ''Thinking Critically'' (9th ed.), {{ISBN|978-0-618-94719-5}}; Brooke Noel Moore and Richard Parker, ''Critical Thinking'' (10th ed.), {{ISBN|978-0-07-803828-0}}; Peter Facione, ''THINK Critically'', {{ISBN|978-0-295-73845-8}}.  He is cited once, in end-note 1 from page 2, of Hassham, Irwin, Nardone, and Wallace, ''Critical Thinking: A Student's Introduction'' (4th ed.) {{ISBN|978-0-07-340743-2}}.  I don't think that allows him to pass the PROF test; however, if you can find additional evidence, please ping me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:42)

Comment: If I search google scholar for "RW Paul" instead of "Richard William Paul", a lot of hits pop out, with citation counts in the hundred, even up to just over 1,000. I'm not familiar enough with  to know if this meets notability requirements. Aynone out there who can enlighten me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)