Deletion of Bill Gillespie

Comment: The above nomination is horrible as the nominator gives us no reasoning behind his mention of policy. The subject looks notable to me and has satisfies . The article could use sourcing better, especially in citing his awards and long career. And it needs updating
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He seems to meet . His book got at least one long reviewhttp://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/25143049?uid=3738032&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21102262673691; he's been involved in campaigns over media freedom; he's been caught up in a row over anti-semitism; he's a distinguished figure in Canadian journalism; there was wide press reporting over the death of his son
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly passes  as cited sources are adequate to show notability, but I agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)