Deletion of Shuchi Anand

Comment: per nom and JoelleJay. Ultimately the coverage is related to her research in one study, and not to her as a scientist. Notability is not inherited. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NPROF)

Comment: I've revised the article and added sources, including from https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2020/09/few-americans-have-coronavirus-antibodies-study-finds.html?sf129512559=1 Stanford News, https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/25/health/coronavirus-antibodies-dialysis-patients/index.html CNN, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-25/covid-immunity-remains-low-with-under-10-of-u-s-adults-exposed Bloomberg, and https://www.newsweek.com/national-coronavirus-antibody-study-suggests-herd-immunity-remains-out-reach-us-1534497 Newsweek. Per  criteria 1, "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, ''broadly construed'', as demonstrated by independent reliable sources," (my emphasis) e.g. "pioneering a scalable sampling strategy that offers a blueprint for standardised national serosurveillance in the USA and other countries with a large haemodialysing population," per Imperial College London professors Barnaby Flower and Christina Atchison, but this also looks like  notability due to the amount of news coverage, including the sources noted by Ritchie333
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per nomination. Agreed with the nominator that this does not satisfy  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per , "previous outcomes do not bind future ones because consensus can change," and the above-cited discussions seem to contain various supports for keeping this article, (e.g. there is robust biographical content, Anand is a first author in a variety of studies) and seem distinguishable from this one, because none appear to have had a notable impact on the political and https://www.idsociety.org/multimedia/clinician-calls/cdcidsa-covid-19-clinician-call-the-epidemiology-of-covid-19/ public health crisis (CDC/IDSA, October 17, 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic similar to Anand after developing a career that prepared them for such an accomplishment and notable ongoing work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: on reading the detailed discussion and in noting the public and cited recognition of Anand's leadership in the Lancet and other media, I suggest  applies. Research is ongoing and improvement of her academic content on Wikipedia be monitored
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Here are some AfD precedents demonstrating a) broad coverage of someone's intellectual output does not satisfy C1 or GNG; b) being quoted extensively regarding one's own research does not suffice for C1, C7, or GNG; c) SIGCOV ''of the person'' that is related to one study or event does not meet GNG criteria (per ); and d) even being interviewed or nontrivially profiled in articles giving in-depth coverage of one's solo-authored/founded company/research isn't enough for GNG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: Also, one of the updates I've made to the article is to make it more clear that Anand is the director of the https://med.stanford.edu/nephrology/tkd.html Stanford Center for Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease, which seems to support her notability per  criteria 6
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)