Deletion of Victory mosque

Comment: as a |non-notable neologism.  No attested use before this current year
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: but rewrite to conform to . A quick Google confirms that "victory mosque" is a very common piece of political rhetoric about which readers would be understandably curious
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as article seems to exist to advance a strongly held |point of view on a current controversy.  It tries to create a facade of respectability by listing other mosques through history but doesn't show that this term or anything similar was ever used in connection with those mosques prior to the current controversy.  No attempt whatsoever is made to provide a balance of views.  The Christian Science Monitor reference looks impressive only at first glance - it is an advocacy opinion piece by someone who is spreading this term, and is therefore not an |independent, secondary, reliable source. The second reference doesn't even mention the "victory mosque" and is instead an article about the overall controversy. Both are worthless as references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS)