Deletion of Diablo 3 (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . Salt if possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I'm really on the fence with this one leaning toward deletion for the simple reason that I believe the anticipation alone for this game is notable enough to warrant an entry on Wikipedia.  The problem is, if we leave the article up while removing all of the rumors/speculation - and |original research, we will be left with an article stub that will likely degenerate into a what-I-would-like-to-see-type article being passed off as legitimate information. I guess the better course of action is to remove the article until Blizzard officially announces whether or not the game will be released
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per .  Wikipedia is no place for rumors or vaporware.  Or, for that matter, rumors about vaporware
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per . It would be a notable game, but that would require it to exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: fails  and the whole article is a bunch of |original research. We don't create articles based on conjecture - concrete sources are needed per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOR||WP:V)