Deletion of List of CJK fonts

Comment: lists are a valid class of WP article. No apparent attempt to establish whether these lists are |notable |before nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: lists are a legit form of Wikipedia article. Lists must meet a |notability criteria, however
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: vote for List of CJK fonts. This is more than a mere collection of links, so perhaps a better proposition is to augment the article with history on why native system and other fonts are relevant to efficient presentation of web content across several Asian languages (in this case the CJK subset). Additionally, adding a table of the common system fonts would provide the relevance argument, as web designers need to have a source of native font references to put into their style sheets and know that they are web-safe fonts. As mentioned above, lists are a valid class of WP article, and it would appear that |notability criteria has been been met by the many years of web development and millions of pages encoded in the fonts specified. I personally spent several hours of research before coming across this article, which saved me the effort of researching what had already been compiled from apparently reputable sources. Inadequacy that can be corrected shouldn't disqualify the article from being retained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)