Deletion of Abby Johnson (activist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: to Planned Parenthood per .  Deletion and a redlink is just an invitation to re-create the article. The incident could be noted briefly in the main article or perhaps there is a spinoff article that lists similar events
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Article needs some work, but subject clearly meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: unsure -- leaning weak delete) - There was the  coverage, but I dispute that GRuban's sources are evidence of continued coverage (and that they're even reliable sources). They're ''all'' self-published (e.g. a ''reader blog'' hosted by the Houston Chronicle is not the Houston Chronicle), opinion columns, small local papers, biased publications which engage in pro-life activism, or some combination thereof. Whether it's enough to demonstrate that the subject has had lasting significance is a tough question. I would feel a lot more comfortable if we had a couple examples of mainstream coverage outside of opinion columns. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: GRuban has sucessfully demonstrated that she clearly meets the |GNG.  The article should be edited for neutrality, but it currently is not beyond saving
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)