Deletion of Star Wars: Battlefront III (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article sourcing is presented in with good formatting, but if you really delved into it, you probably would find some websites than Wikipedia reliable sources. However, the authors of the Wikipedia article haven't gone hog wild with the amount of information in the article and seem to make a great effort to source everything. On balance, even accounting for the citation to non reliable or non-independent sources, the topic probably meets  with the sourcing now in the article. Some additional source material may include
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Plenty of coverage in |reliable sources, and plenty to be said.  doesn't apply to the concept on a whole, since the prospect of the game received so much coverage. That's why/how ''Chrono Break'' (essentially a trademark) was not only kept, but promoted to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chrono_Break Good Article status
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL)