Deletion of Crucible (software)

Comment: The broader look concerns me here, that alternatives to deletion per  (a policy) have not been attempted or even considered.  Even if consensus were that the subject does not warrant ''its own article'' per  (a guideline) ''the information'' could merged somewhere else - for instance under Atlassian, with a redirect - and according to policy this should be considered.  The nom. regularly puts up software articles for deletion and the coming months we may or may not see similar nominations of: JIRA Studio, Clover (software), FishEye (software), Crowd (software), Bamboo (software), Confluence (software), JIRA (software), which all have largely the same sourcing problems as this one, and for which a nomination will send other editors scrambling for finding sources.  So I suggest that somebody concerned with the quality of Wikipedia's coverage of software, the nom. perhaps,  merges all these articles into a parent Atlassian article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:N)