Deletion of Timo Pielmeier (3rd nomination)

Comment: per above, though I'll admit a small bias as I rewrote it in a bid to make it a workable article when it showed up on the project's unsourced BLP list.  I don't think we had any intentions on the 100 game mark - we simply didn't think through the differences between skaters and goalies.  He passes  at any rate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm going to throw out an |IAR on this one and say keep. Although, I do have some evidence he meets |GNG. The NHL did a feature entirely on him http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=515016 here, he received significant coverage after scoring a goal http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=510621, http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/30210-Goalie-Timo-Pielmeier-scores-emptynet-goal-for-Bakersfield-Condors.html, he's played in the ECHL All-Star Game and in numerous U17, U18, and U20 tournaments. It's a weak argument, I know, but one that is fair enough to be made
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:GNG)

Comment: Past discussions have set clear precedents that, barring a successful  argument (complete with links to reliable independent sources), a hockey player will not be considered notable enough for a Wikipedia article unless that player explicitly passes one or more of the criteria set out at . As it is currently written, there is no "goaltender exception" to the NHOCKEY criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NHOCKEY)