Deletion of 2010 Christmas special (Doctor Who)

Comment: Significant coverage in two reliable sources. From : "''Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place''". This is both, and so long as |original research is avoided (which it is at present), there is no policy-based reason not to keep this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OR)

Comment: we have well-sourced information on guest stars, so  doesn't apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP: CRYSTAL)

Comment: to List of Doctor Who serials#Special (2010) - to be honest, there's so little to say about this at the moment that it doesn't need a separate article, especially since all the information here is already contained in that list. However, I don't think it's much of a problem either - it's already notable and virtually certain to be shown on schedule, so  doesn't apply, and it's likely we'll need the article pretty soon. Redirecting would be the best approach as it would allow it to be restored when there's more to say about it. Either way, it shouldn't be deleted outright
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL)

Comment: It's not a CRYSTAL problem - at worst, it's a variation of , but even then, there's enough production details in reliable sources to know this is happening.  While it likely would have been better to keep this separate until the name was at least known, it's fine to keep this for now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER)

Comment: Has enough reliable sources that both confirm its existence and the details mentioned. As with previous Xmas specials, further information is likely to be added soon but even the current amount justifies this article's existence at this point. Neither the nominator nor those !voting "delete" have cited any ''policy''-based reasons to delete this article; especially  does not apply in this case since the information is not speculative and the event is certain to happen (or, as pointed out above, will be notable even if it for some reason does not). Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Exception 1 of  applies. This is something that is almost certain to happen, and if it *doesn't* happen, the reasons why will be notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)