Deletion of Israeli apartheid (phrase)

Comment: as per Viriditas. Such an article is inherently POV, regardless of the neutrality of the content. The fact that propagandists widely use this term is worth mentioning in Zionism and racism, but #Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought|Wikipedia is ''not'' the forum for fabricating legitimacy for a propoganda|propogandist term by treating it as if it isn't a |neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NEO)

Comment: and merge some content to Israeli-occupied territories: It is my sad conculsion that wikipedia is unable to implemnet it's own policy as far as  and  (not being a propeganda or soapbox) see
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NOT)

Comment: per Viriditas an 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)