Deletion of Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film)

Comment: Seems a |pointy nomination after this Talk:No_Country_for_Old_Men_(film)#Merger_Proposal_.28Withdrawn.29|ass handing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per : ''"Wikipedia articles cover topics at several levels of detail: the lead contains a quick summary of the topic's most important points, and each major subtopic is detailed in its own section of the article.... A fuller treatment of any major subtopic should go in a separate article of its own."'' I saw your comment at Talk:Themes and analysis of No Country for Old Men (film) and have to disagree with your assessment. We cannot compare Wikipedia to "normal" encyclopedias. Per , ''"It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers."'' The only limitation to apply is , but I think that this topic is a viable one, considering how scrutinized this film has been. You could make a case to shorten some of this article's sections and address excessive quoting, but that does not mean we should erase this topic from the encyclopedia. This sort of subtopic is uncommon but does exist; see items at :Category:Themes in works of fiction. I believe that we should encourage this kind of subtopic because it is a closer look at a film. A well-analyzed film could not fit all of the coverage on the main article, so splitting it off as a stand-alone article can suffice. Readers at the main article don't have to be overwhelmed, and those who are interested in going in depth about the subtopic can make the trip to the secondary article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY||WP:5P||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)