Deletion of Medea Hypothesis

Comment: Fails , as the book has not been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself. The http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/01/11/dark_green/?page=1 boston.com article is the only article that currently satisfies this criteria. However, this one source contains sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary, and it's likely that more non-trivial sources will appear after publication
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)