Deletion of Hemmersbach

Comment: Not a single reference mentioned in the article or at this AfD meets the criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per . We require multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. What we have are a series of churnalism|puff pieces and PR which fail the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Nürnberger Nachrichten is an esteemed and independent German newspaper, and does seem unrelated to the company in question; as such I do not think that  applies. I also do not see any blogs cited as sources. However, I can somewhat relate to the sentiment that some parts of the article look somewhat PR'ish - but not to the degree that it would fail 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:PROMO)

Comment: This is another full-write ups from indepedant, reputable newspaper https://www.scmp.com/presented/tech/topics/asia-2030/article/3093651/why-it-subscription-service-office-computer-devices. Bayerischer Rundfunk|BR is Bavaria's public broadcasting service with 8 million listeners each day and did a dedicated interview on Hemmersbach's CEO, Ralph Koczwara https://www.br.de/mediathek/podcast/eins-zu-eins-der-talk/ralph-koczwara-unternehmer/1789716. Admittedly, the rhino story was one focus but equally so was Hemmersbach. I did include some blogs and press releases which I am happy to remove if wished by Wiki editors? Even if these articles were removed there would be no grounds for  and  due to variation of independent sources (ZDF, Nordbayern, South China Morning Post, BR, FairPlanet, Nurnberger Nachricthen etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: These https://www.nordbayern.de/wirtschaft/it-firma-aus-nurnberg-macht-die-welt-ein-wenig-besser-1.10183017 https://www.nordbayern.de/wirtschaft/per-helikopter-zur-bohrinsel-1.6344195 are not press releases, they are full write-ups in an independent newspaper (Nürnberger Nachrichten). Multiple winner of a statewide ministerial prize does carry some weight. Quite some overlap of other material with the multiply embattled Hemmersbach Rhino Force, but I don't think  applies (notability is not just based on the rhino thing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: As I went through the citations I began to wonder if this was an IT company or a social/environmental activist organization.  Nice that they are good corporate citizens but none of that explains why this company meets . In picking just two the South China Morning Post citation is paid placement where the end of the article carries the disclaimer, “views and opinions expressed are those of the sponsor..”.  The IHK Nürnberg für English language site doesn’t return anything about them the company name is ran through a search.  Page creating editor may be a single-purpose account as there are few contributions that are unrelated to this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIRS)

Comment: Having read the above discussion and the sources for the article, I think it should be deleted. The sources, in spite of being mainly in reliable publications, are too complimentary of the company to demonstrate clear-cut independent content. This is why I think the company is a / fail. Their mention in an ''FT'' list is good but not significant coverage. Overall, this has the look of a really good PR drive. I would change my mind if several pieces of ''disinterested'' coverage in secondary sources were to surface. With regard to MichaelDubley, his contributions list does nothing to assuage concerns that the account is a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRITE||WP:COMPANY||WP:SPA)