Deletion of Elaine Bowers

Comment: The quote from Jimbo above is the opinion of one wikipedian, not even a proposed guideline.  Wikipedia:Notability has a link to some guidelines for notability for books at .  It gives a good list of 10 notability criteria.  This book doesn't come close to meeting any of them.  I have no data on sales but would honestly be suprised if the sales for this book have reached three figures.  Just because something is verifiable and can be presented in a NPOV fashion does NOT mean it is encyclopedic.  For example, I have a dandelion in my yard.  This can be verified, it can also be presented in an NPOV fashion.  But encyclopedic?  Of course not.  Notability is the key.  The dandelion is not. And, nor is the book per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:BK)

Comment: The author is not notable either.  The standard for notability for an author per  is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)