Deletion of Shhuddhi

Comment: for a short time per |TOO SOON. And please {{u|Wgolf}}... even for poorly sourced articles, we need be careful about assumptions, as due diligence finds the topic of this planned film to be NOT A HOAX.http://www.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/its-official-salman-khan-replaces-hrithik-roshan-in-karan-johars-shhuddhi-161877.html ''India Times'' http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/hrithik-roshan-talks-about-shhuddhi-bang-bang-mohenjo-daro-and-krrish-4/ ''IndiCine'' http://www.ibtimes.co.in/kareena-kapoor-khan-reveals-why-she-turned-down-shhuddhi-606124 ''IBTimes'' http://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/karan-johar-blocks-2016-s-big-weekends/article1-1243662.aspx ''Hinustan Times'', etc. As this production IS getting some coverage even now, we can allow undeletion or recreation under | (paragraph 3) just as soon as filming commences
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYF||WP:NFF)

Comment: First of all there is spelling error in the title, it has to be '''http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kareena-kapoor-finally-reveals-why-she-rejected-shuddhi/1/375605.html Shuddhi''' instead of ''Shhuddhi''. And {{ping|Wgolf}}, I agree with {{ping|MichaelQSchmidt}} as even poorly sourced article can be notable and same thing goes with this article. It can be moved to draft or delete it as per . &#8212
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: not a hoax  but per |TOO SOON
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:NYF)