Deletion of Fr. Chico Monteiro

Comment: given the self-serving nature of your own article, I thought it might be worth checking your other contributions.  I found a lot of link-spam and a few more self-serving articles.  Seriously - you think an award you made up yourself is worthy of an article?  The piont here is that it appears you don't understand our policies regarding a subject's notability.  As for removing links, when the relevant links are all from your website, then yes, they fail our |reliable sources test and I removed them as I would remove any link-spam.  If Time magazine has an article on this fellow, then by all means, add a reference to this article.  Keep in mind, however, that we don't write articles on a subject just because Time magazine did.  When a subject is notable, it isn't difficult for experts on that subject to find some really great sources.  You, the expert, appear to have primarily yourself as a source.  This gives us a strong indication that the subject isn't notable ''according to our standards.''  If this should change in the future, that's great.  We'll still be here, and if necessary, we have a deletion review process
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per , cover the event (if notable), not the person. Alternatively, rename, take out the unnecessary biographical info and expand the ''Rev. Msgr. Chico Monteiro v. The State of Goa'' section into an article if that case passes the notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)