Deletion of Anne Selene Fiko

Comment: I found absolutely nothing out there that would back up any of the claims in the article. The only sources that seem to mention Fiko at all are all primary sources released by Fiko or her publisher. To be honest, the sources on the article are a joke and I encourage whomever added it to Wikipedia to read , and  to see what is required to establish notability and  to see what is considered to be a reliable source. (Facebook is never usable as a source, not even to back up anything trivial.) No matter how notable you believe the person is, you will always, always, '''always''' need reliable sources to back this up- especially if it is about something or someone from another country. As far as to the claims on the talk page that this is all a conspiracy against small publishers or specific people, no. No it isn't. These are the "set in stone" rules that Wikipedia requires in order to show notability. The only reason you see fewer books and authors from small publishers is because they simply lack the reliable sources to show notability. Reliable sources are sources from places that Wikipedia considers trustworthy that talk about the subject, are not primary sources, and do more than briefly mention or discuss the article subject. In this case we had several sources that mentioned the company that Fiko supposedly is a part of, but doesn't actually mention her. Now as far as conspiracies go, many times you'll get editors who edit on multiple Wikipedias because they have the language skills to be able to do so. Many times they'll notice an article that doesn't pass notability guidelines and make the necessary steps to remove it from that particular country's Wiki, then go check to see if the article has been uploaded to the other Wikipedias (which happens quite frequently). It's not a vendetta against any one particular person or anything specific, just the editor doing their job as a proper editor on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR||WP:RS)

Comment: Per  #2, which is that rarity among WP rules, a rule that ''establishes a criterion for inclusion'', rather than exclusion. It seems to me that the number of hits to verify ASF's involvement in the early, pre-personal computer days of computing, even with a casual search, are very healthy for an area that normally gets very little coverage at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)