Deletion of Ryan Fournier

Comment: From what I can tell, this individual has quite a few notable sources written on him that take away the argument of him not having nobility per . I also would reject most of the claims written by the petitioner
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fournier is undoubtably notable per , just considering the cited IBT source alone. I reject the WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON, and WP:POLITICIAN arguments. That being said, he is known solely for his S4T activities. Neither Fournier's article nor S4T's is very long at all, so I see no practical basis for maintaining two short articles that are essentially about the same thing. TimmyScotts and Jamesharrison2014, your positions are noted, please stop commenting here and let the AfD run its course. '''Closer note:''' it does appear from the discussion above that TimmyScotts is at best a connected contributor and at worst is violating our TOS as a |paid contributor. {{nw
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PAID)