Deletion of Shitburger

Comment: to McDonalds as after all there burgers are {{redacted|fucking}} {{redacted|shit}}, Anyway joking aside |We're not a dictionary so '''Delete''' it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)

Comment: Much as I'd like to read encyclopedic information about this subject, there really doesn't seem to be a great deal of it. We expect encyclopedic entries to define terms more than give examples of usage. The subject seems to fail . Sorry and maybe if more in-depth sources can be found which discuss the subject then this can be revisited in the future via undeletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: This clearly doesn't fall into the class of articles described at . If all it takes to make an encyclopedia article about a word is a bunch of discriminated definitions illustrated with examples of usage, then every entry in the ''Oxford English Dictionary'' is automatically an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WORDISSUBJECT)

Comment: or '''Redirect to Shit''' No social or historical significance has been shown, and that is required under ikipedia is Not a Dictionary.  Accordingly, shitcan it, or brace for a whole slew of further articles along similar lines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: per being a (yes) stupid phrase that has, through sourced usage (not ) become part of American culture. We |cannot ignore sources or usage per an animus toward the word or phrase itself. Being called a slang term does not denigrate its wide and multi-sourced usage. |Examples of other similar slang terms within Wikipedia include fubar and clusterfuck, and no doubt there are many dozens more just as dis-liked. I am reminded of the denigrating word nigga (a word usually fine for one race to use but not another) and the also-denigrating words chink, spic, Greaser (derogatory)|greaser, et all. Its the sourced usage that allows an article on such heinous terms, including usage... however disliked or inappropriate for family use
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:UNCENSORED||WP:WAX)