Deletion of Grenfell Tower

Comment: Acceptable as a spin off article from the one about the fire, which currently stands at 128KB. Sadly because of the fire the building itself is notable and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: An acceptable . This is a very major disaster with highly significant consequences. The article will continue to grow and it makes sense to have a separate article for the building. Meets  itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:GNG)

Comment: and |TROUT to the nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: WP:REDUNDANTFORK to fire (or better target is Lancaster West Estate) - sourcing is poor with |unreliable and primaries plus ones for the fire topic. Duplicate of Grenfell Tower fire#The building The topic scope is 99% overlap - the focus of the fire topic is currently about the building, so it only hinders readers to split it ''now''. Better together. If/when needed, split per , not now
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPINOUT)