Deletion of List of sportspeople by nickname (second nomination)

Comment: per my vote in the original AfD. Citing  as a rationale for deleting this is sheerly a smokescreen by the original nominator, since whether or not these nicknames have been applied to the people is a matter for simple verification by means of published sources; original research has no part in it. And  requires that an article's facts need be ''verifiable'' for the article to be kept, not that they all be currently sourced. I'm also having a hard time seeing where the  concerns are coming from: If there's anything in the article that's egregiously disparaging of living persons, I'm not seeing it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:BLP)

Comment: as  listcruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: List of trivia and none of these names are cited to anywhere, arousing my  concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per my arguments in the DRV. Wikipedia '''IS''' a collection of information, Durinsbane... the idea that it isn't is silly and I can't believe anyone would actually say that. Only specific things are excluded as being an ''indiscriminate'' collection, please read the section in  on what those items actually are. Anyway, blanking this article was a bad idea... an AFD is the best time for an article to get improved with stuff like sourcing. The DRV showed consensus that this is not a BLP issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)