Deletion of Nefsis

Comment: The sources are not notable. The Chigago Tribune source is a very brief passing mention. Cloudbook is simply a directory. Many of the other sources are simply press releases, and many others are personal blogs.  Of all the links I clicked, there is not a single source in any of the 18 listed that passes the notability guidelines.  None of the sources meet the 'depth of criteria' and 'independence of sources' guidelines as found in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: per  Reasons #5 and 6. Look at News: sourcing is not impossible. Multiple independent sources exist and coverage is not trivial. First of all, the nomination reason is just wrong. There is one source title very similar to another, but after looking through five sources in a Google News search and in the article, I gave up trying to find another copy. This amounts to little more than a chance for the nominator to use this new word in a sentence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: while there is some coverage in third-party sources here, they're not |reliable sources; most just seem to be blogs and press-release recyclers. The coverage in reliable sources, such as the Chicago Tribune and Arizona Republic, isn't significant enough to count for our inclusion guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)