Deletion of List of Green Bay Packers retired numbers

Comment: The narrative portion of the Green Bay list has now been expanded to provide appropriate contextual information, and there is sufficient coverage of each team's retired numbers (as a cohesive topic) to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Meets , as it "{{tq|has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources}}". The significant Chargers specific prose currently in the list is not in List of National Football League retired numbers, nor should it be.  It is also not in Los Angeles Chargers, which is in line with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:SUMMARYSTYLE)

Comment: See , , and  for policies and guidelines regarding standalone lists. The basic guidelines include: a defined membership, notable people make up the list, and the list is discussed in reliable sources. The main reasons listed to delete are that the list is not long enough and that it can be included in the larger article. From what I can see, neither of these are established in Wikipedia policies or guidelines. The list is clearly defined (if the Packers have formally retired a number), made up of notable people (all professional football players with extensive careers and accolades), and is discussed in reliable sources as a cohesive list (see http://archive.jsonline.com/packerinsider/99326524.html Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, https://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/dougherty/2016/06/22/packers-should-retire-hornungs-no-5/86237952/ USA Today, http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/14232466/brett-favre-retired-number-unveiled-green-bay-packers ESPN just to name a few). This list needs to be expanded and improved, but that is never a reason to delete an article. This list should expand on various things that wouldn't be included in the Green Bay Packers article, including backgrounds on each player, why the organization decided to retire their number, discussion about unofficial retired numbers, and the addition of future retired numbers. The Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame is a completely different topic and would not be appropriate for the list of retired numbers. It appears that none of the delete votes are rooted in any policies or guidelines, and just comes down to the article not being good enough at this time. Note to the closing admin that deletion discussions should be based on |adherence to policy before determining consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:LISTCRITERIA||WP:LISTPEOPLE||WP:NHC)

Comment: Enough sources mentioned above to meet .  Sure there is little prose in the Green Bay list currently, but enough sources exists where it could be expanded and the page would be in line with  like Los Angeles Chargers retired numbers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:SUMMARYSTYLE)