Deletion of @HopeMob

Comment: First of all, 4meter4's sources are terrible (sorry!). Crowdfunding: A New Media & Society article at https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/37142669/New_Media_Society-2014-Bennett-1461444814558906.pdf?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DCrowdfunding_A_New_Media_and_Society_Spe.pdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A%2F20191122%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20191122T184652Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=a89e23860391dfb7da05f62e4741181fc9936d8208383ca0891893f6abf65cd6 has just this: "What are the benefits and disadvantages of using crowdfunding platforms such as HopeMob" and Telegram source at https://www.telegram.com/news/20170207/activist-shaun-king-bemoans-dip-in-humanity is "and co-founded the crowdfunding platform @HopeMob, which is dedicated to giving resources to leaders and communities of color". However, I found a lot of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources like https://www.fastcompany.com/1681036/a-new-platform-for-real-charity-online https://www.christianpost.com/news/hopemob-revolutionizing-charity-giving-with-online-crowd-funding-91538/ https://techcrunch.com/2012/07/26/finding-inspiration-in-the-aurora-tragedy-by-helping-victims-through-hopemob/ https://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/12/08/hopemob-the-kickstarter-for-causes-relaunches-as-a-no-fee-fundraising-platform-open-to-all/ https://web.archive.org/web/20151003191331/http://upstart.bizjournals.com/entrepreneurs/hot-shots/2013/05/01/shaun-king-combines-charity.html?ana=lnk&page=all https://www.huffpost.com/entry/meet-the-hopemob_b_1265288 https://mashable.com/2012/01/04/hopemob-charity-website/, with some bits at https://www.forbes.com/sites/devinthorpe/2013/03/28/shaun-king-brings-hopemob-to-crowdfunding/#64067a0f2530 https://venturebeat.com/2013/05/02/hopemob-founders-latest-project-uses-celebrity-influence-for-social-good/ https://www.thedailybeast.com/goldie-taylorwhere-did-all-the-money-shaun-king-raised-for-black-lives-go. There is even a coverage in a book https://books.google.com/books?id=HXYdzs-RBDEC&pg=PT150&lpg=PT150&dq=HopeMob&source=bl&ots=AIf7SxL0bd&sig=ACfU3U2hEqkU3t_kXyt8sEg6DodKPSjWgw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjcuu3_uv7lAhVhwIsKHQVMCYoQ6AEwKnoECCEQAQ#v=onepage&q=HopeMob&f=false. Meets  easily, which requires multiple significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It's clearly |not notable based on lack of |deep coverage in reliable secondary sources. I think |this is an nonredeemable mess, but your opinion may differ. A redirect to its founder would not be helpful, since our readers would not know to use the at sign first to search for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:TNT)