Deletion of 1906 (film) (3rd nomination)

Comment: per continued coverage, perhaps specially due to its setbacks, which has allowed this one to be one of those very few allowed exceptions to F in that ''|the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines'' and through its meeting the inclusion criteria of WP:CRYSTAL's  ''|All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced'') and in its otherwise surpassing the instructions per 's ''|If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:CBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: or perhaps merge to Brad Bird.  On the one hand this is a project in pre-production that does not (yet) meet .  On the other there are enough sources to support an article on the production even if the film never actually gets made.  In such cases there is usually a better merge target but the book is redlinked and the notability of the project is mainly due to Bird's involvement so he is probably the best choice if a merge is desired.  In either case there is no pressing need to delete the history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)