Deletion of Pteronophillia

Comment: as a piece of gibberish OR which leaves me with the uncomfortable feeling that this is someone's attempt to |legitimise their sexual fantasies about chickens, although surely this warrants a move to BJAODN. My personal favourite line is "the ever popular fairy is indeed an ever popular target". I think I've met the guy he's talking about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Quoting from the article itself: "Closing- All of this work has been done based off of nonfactual evidence, as no actual scientific evidence or novels of any sort exist documenting ,at the moment, such a fetish. All of the notation has been done by a pteronophilliac with the aid of a physchology major and a masters thesis on fetishes".  Fetish articles, in WP and online, are rife with |protologistic constructions from |arbitrary Greek or Latinate roots.  This is no exception
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NFT)