Deletion of Shock site (3rd nomination)

Comment: as much of a pain in the ass as this article can be given the fact that it draws quite a few editors who want to spam their own favorite |unattributed shock site into the article, it is a real concept and I think it has been fairly well established that at least some of the entries can be sourced.  It is making headway... but if there was any site that should be exempted from  when it comes to aggressively expunging non-notable additions like "Meatspin" and "Hai2u"... this is it.  Still that isn't a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:3RR)

Comment: per Tbeatty and others. None of the support arguments are particularly convincing - the article currently lacks reliable sources, violating a couple of rather important "Double-yew-pee-colon" thingos. "It ''may'' have sources!" isn't convincing &mdash; someone needs to turn up with the |goods (after a long time of sourcing stagnation, as Mangojuice says above), as it doesn't cut it at the moment-K
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)