Deletion of Santa Cruz Breakers FC

Comment: Except that the team is not eligible to play in the national cup either, beyond existing in League Two, which really is not sufficient. Plus League Two is a set of regional leagues with a national playoff, not to mention not sanctioned by USSF. How exactly is a profile for one of the team's players and a "local roundup" of sports in the area sufficient to satisfy  for this team
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  with significant coverage both in the article and in other articles such as https://register-pajaronian.com/article/santa-cruz-breakers-fc-aims-to-send-players-to-the-pros and https://www.frontrowsoccer.com/2018/01/31/pdl-addition-santa-cruz-breakers-fc-join-league/. Needs a bit of a rewrite though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It would be appreciated if those arguing that the article ''does'' meet  would explain how it does so. At the moment, the only users I have seen really addressing the notability concerns in detail are myself and Levivich. My concern is that all of the sources are either  or don't actually address the notability of the subject, either because they aren't in-depth coverage or because they don't actually address the subject in question e.g. addressing a particular player. At the moment the sourcing feels woefully insufficient to meet , and the fact that the team exists and plays in USL2 is really weak grounds for inclusion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG)

Comment: The professional league requirement only applies to players, not the clubs themselves. Also, meets  per the sources from GiantSnowman
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:GNG not demonstrated, and having not played in a professional league or in the national cup, the article fails . It's a plausible search term and redirects are cheap, so a redirect would be appropriate
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: By my count, Wikipedia has 70 articles about USL League Two teams.  To me this is a clear indication that there is consensus that such teams are inherently notable enough to have articles.  I realize this may come across as a  argument, but it's really a  argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:OTHERNOTABLESTUFFEXISTSSOTHISSHOULDTOO)