Deletion of Michael J. Stattelman

Comment: I left https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mstatt#The_Michael_J._Stattelman_article a message on the author's talk page four days ago, explaining that if the article is to avoid deletion, then all content must be verifiable and that notability (in the Wikipedia sense) must be established. I explained that this would need good quality references for the factual material in the page and suggested  as a straightforward criterion to aim to satisfy. Since then, the author has neither replied to my message nor made any changes to the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . I am unable to find significant coverage of this individual in reliable secondary sources, or any sources apart from social media. I notice that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Google scholar search finds only one uncited patent by him, so there's no chance of notability through , which generally requires multiple heavily-cited publications. And as the author of three self-published books, one of which has the spammiest title I can ever remember seeing, he doesn't appear to pass . No other form of notability evident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)