Deletion of John Santerineross

Comment: article badly needs cleanup (which I promised to provide when I contested the prod less than 24 hours ago), but that is not a valid criteria for deletion.  Subject easily passes  with tons of (genre-specific) reliable source coverage - many of these sources are already listed in the article (not every source in the article is good, but certainly not every one is bad either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:BIO applies, not  - some references are broken (I have commented out two) but NY Arts, thenewyorkartworld, B-creative check out; WP:BIO appears to be fulfilled even if none of the additional criteria of  apply.  applies. Almost all of the article is unsourced; this is, however, grounds for deletion only as last resort. Article also fails  and . Needs very substantial editing, but not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BLPDEL||WP:BLPSTYLE||WP:NPF)

Comment: and send article to  for major sandblasting. Subject passes  and . Article style is |fixable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:IMPROVE)