Deletion of Rage of Mages II: Necromancer

Comment: A failure of . Found indepth reviews on Computer Games Magazine https://web.archive.org/web/20050304123927/http://www.cdmag.com/articles/023/082/ragem2_review.html, GameSpy https://web.archive.org/web/20020602014542/http://www.gamespy.com/legacy/reviews/rom_a.shtm GameSpot https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/rage-of-mages-ii-necromancer-review/1900-2532853/, IGN https://www.ign.com/articles/1999/10/15/rage-of-mages-2-necromancer, Gamezilla (reliable per /RS) https://web.archive.org/web/20000817183639/http://www.gamezilla.com/reviews/r/rom2.asp, Gry Online (reliable per /RS) https://www.gry-online.pl/S020.asp?ID=430, Absolute Games (reliable per /RS) http://www.ag.ru/games/rage-of-mages-2-necromancer/review, coverage in a gaming magazine Svet Kompjutera https://www.sk.rs/1999/08/siop10.html a preview on GameZone https://www.gamezone.com/previews/rage_of_mages_2_necromancer_pc_preview/... I would suggest the nominator to withdraw the AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:VG||WP:VG||WP:VG)

Comment: The https://www.mobygames.com/game/windows/rage-of-mages-ii-necromancer/mobyrank MobyGames page lists multiple reviews in what appears to be reliable sources (Particularly PC_Games_(magazine)|PC Games and PC_Player_(German_magazine)|PC Player). Some of these are still online (https://web.archive.org/web/20020602014542/http://www.gamespy.com/legacy/reviews/rom_a.shtm 1 https://www.gry-online.pl/S020.asp?ID=430 2 ). The ones we don't have access to still Wikipedia:NEXIST|exist and so support notability. Passes  as it has  in multiple 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)