Deletion of AVN Award for Best New Starlet

Comment: this could be considered a |content fork for the AVN Awards for one of its most significant categories. The problem is, is it a  since the information is there in the page; just hard to quickly view year to year with the other categories there too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:REDUNDANTFORK)

Comment: per |DEL8 as clearly failing |GNG, the relevant notability guideline. Feigned shock, polemics about deletionists and anti-sex bias, and inept comparisons to notable awards notwithstanding, there is simply no significant coverage of this subject in independent, plausibly-reliable sources. (''Good Morning America'' 's description of the award as "coveted" is not significant coverage by any stretch of the imagination.) Also, there is nothing wrong with the article's use of primary sources: the problem is that primary sources do not count towards establishing notability. ''See'' . I strongly suggest that the retention proponents make some minimal effort to locate independent sources that do more than mention the award in passing, as the existing votes are unconvincing. ''Cf.''  ("Once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL8||WP:GNG||WP:NRVE||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per . This is not an article, but a malformatted list, a coatrack to display preferred images of porn actresses. That its supporters think an image of Jenna Jameson in lingerie sticking her hand into her crotch has encyclopedic value is pretty telling. In no other field do we maintain articles in this format -- oversized images, nominee longlists, absence of meaningful text, etc. If this list is to be kept, it should be restored to a more normal format, like this version https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AVN_Award_for_Best_New_Starlet&oldid=719837381, rather than the current porn-only anomalous display format
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: this is at best a list of those who received the award, and were nominated for it. The article says nothing meaningful about the award ''itself'' and no sources are provided that discuss the subject. I also note that 15 people are nominated each year, making the list of ''nominees'' essentially meaningless, making the article a  /  page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY||WP:PROMO)