Deletion of Alaa Najjar

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A lot of the arguments in favor of "Keep" seem to be on the basis of WotY providing notability, and BLP does provide for this, with  #1: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times; or". However, I haven't seen any arguments for how this is met; can those in favor provide such arguments so that we can properly consider them?  I would also like to echo Mz7 and pushback against the concept of "GNG" being just a guideline; I've always interpreted it in the opposite direction, that for something to be notable it has to pass GNG (or a subject-specific guideline), but it is a guideline because passing it doesn't guarantee notability, it just opens the possibility of it. Finally, I would like to ask if anyone has found any further sources? At the moment, the only source that I can see indisputably passes GNG is the National News source (the interview may also pass, depending on ones opinion of interviews in regards to GNG and independence
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: based on the discussion above; there have been no arguments presented for the Wikimedian of the Year award being a "well-known and significant award", per the requirements of  #1. I am also not satisfied that GNG has been passed, as no editor has been able to list three articles that meet all the requirements. I recognize this goes against the developing consensus, but it is important to note that  applies. If it turns out that either of these two bars are met, please ping me and we can have a discussion about 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:LOCALCONSENSUS||WP:BLP1E)