Deletion of Yaakov Rokach

Comment: or move to draft space per -I. Current stage, it's not suitable quality, by a long shot, for an English encyclopedia. Seems on shaky Notability grounds, as presented
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: to {{ping|Jac16888}} and closing administrator: It's not clear why this nom is still here with all the keep votes, and why it was relisted. The article is fully compliant with , has |reliable sources, and has spawned the creation of numerous other articles on other members of the Rakah/Adadi families to complement it and populate :Category:Libyan rabbis. Can we close this AFD already? Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: it's clearly not ready for article space, the cited letter is clearly , while the other sources are so vaguely described they are of little use. It seems he created a library, wrote some books (of unknown importance) and knew some better-known rabbis, all of which doesn't sound like a convincing case for |notability at the moment
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG)

Comment: this article clearly qualifies as  &  as even user הסרפד  admits! Poor standards of presentation are not grounds for deletion. This rabbi published at least sixteen original works according to Yaakov Rokach#His Books, an image of the front page of one of them, see Yaakov Rokach#Shaari Tefillah, actually even appears twice in the article, this is a true example and sample of a primary source! So on the contrary, what should be done is such a case is that templates such as {{t|Cleanup}} & {{t|MOS}} could be added just as the {{t|Multiple issues}} was helpfully added, and a request could be put in at  for  help in this regard, but there is no point in cutting off the nose to spite the face. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:TALKJUDAISM||WP:EXPERT)