Deletion of Epigram (newspaper)

Comment: I prodded this article once, and added the notability tag. I believe that while every attempt has been made to assert notability, there are no hard achievements per  or  to support its retention. |Wikipedia is not a soapbox. There is at least one student newspaper in every university and college, and most are not notable. This appears to be quite a young journal, which has never won any award, let alone a "major award". No notable alumni can be cited, and no press coverage to boot. The references supplied are all either |self references, or are trivial mentions which list all nominees for the awards, so one can in no way say any part of this article is |reliably sourced, except for the existence of award nominations, and the fact that a story was picked up by the Times. I do not feel that any of these count as valid assertions of notability per our policies and guidelines. If the article's information is essential to give a complete picture of the Uni, then the content could arguably be integrated there. As it stands, it does not merit an article of its own. |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball either, so we should delete the article, without prejudice to re-creation when it actually becomes notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ORG||WP:SOAP||WP:SELF||WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL)