Deletion of Stephen Canning (2nd nomination)

Comment: As a local council candidate, falls well below the standard of . The coverage of this guy is nowhere near sufficient enough to pass the . The news source cited is plainly unreliable; reliable news sources do not give one-sided coverage of candidates plus a gratuitous link to the candidate's blog http://www.braintreeandwithamtimes.co.uk/news/5040983.Braintree___Tory_boy__mixes_with_top_politicians/. It is critical to uphold the ''reliable sources'' part of the |GNG because without reliable sources we have unreliable articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Local political activist who fails . Mentions in the local party newsletter do not get you notability in the Wikipedia sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Total fail on  and too much  on the rest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:COI)