Deletion of Investigative Project on Terrorism

Comment: The nominator's premises are incorrect. Policy is to fix, rather than delete, articles that are imperfect.  See .  Nor is the argument persuasive that sources have to use the word "Foundation", or that they have to post-date the official incorporation date of the current formal entity, to be relevant to the topic.   The nominator has received advice from multiple editors at #Is inaccurate information acceptable for inclusion if it comes from a self-published source?| (and now here in this AfD), but seems unwilling to accept it. There is no policy violation here, and certainly nothing that can't be addressed through normal editing processes.  Rather than further blizzards of words, the nominator should take a little time to review Wikipedia:Don't bludgeon the process and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:VPM||WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT)

Comment: the subject has received |significant coverage from at least two reliable sources, all be it highly critical of the subject (http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/the_perils_of_steve_emersons_expertise/ Salon, http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/1010/Nonprofit_groups_ties_to_forprofit_entity_draws_scrutiny.html Politico), among a plethora of other reliable sources (easily found by searching for the subject of this article up for AFD). On top of that, in regards to this draft guideline,  (lets call it an essay for our purposes), the subject's publications been highly cited in https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Investigative+Project+on+Terrorism%22&gws_rd=ssl#q=%22Investigative+Project+on+Terrorism%22&tbm=bks&start=0 books (http://books.google.com/books?id=-wwPNjSnxcYC&pg=PA821&dq=%22Investigative+Project+on+Terrorism%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3WQhVNWTCdbkoATb6ILACA&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Investigative%20Project%20on%20Terrorism%22&f=false example), and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Investigative+Project+on+Terrorism%22 journals (including scholarly ones). Therefore, based on what I can find, the subject appears to be notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:PUBLISHER)