Deletion of Eva Bartlett

Comment: The subject is clearly notable due to significant coverage in mainstream sources. I toned down some of the accusatory language in the article, and it needs more work, with expansion to allow for some nuance. My first impression was that the article violated  in an egregious way. However, I read the article sources before commenting, and found it more plausible than not that the article was basically factually accurate. That said, action words are fine for creative writing classes but not necessarily for a neutral encyclopedia. Fairness should be uppermost for a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BLP)

Comment: The article may have issues, although they are not that serious, yet the subject has clearly received significant coverage in reliable sources, so passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)