Deletion of Desert Village Mobile Home Park, Arizona

Comment: There's a precedent (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admiral Trailer Park, Arizona|1, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apache Acres Trailer Park|2, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adobe Mountain Trailer Park|3, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-1 Trailer Park, Arizona|4, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A and F Trailer Park, Arizona|5 among others) that trailer/mobile home parks and similar recent residential developments are not notable unless proven otherwise (e.g. clearly passes  or is a census-designated place). This one doesn't seem to be an exception
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per . Not defunct, still a neighborhood in Mesa, Arizona.  https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/az/mesa/arizona-desert Neighborhood Scout, has a pretty extensive report on the location, using data from U.S. Bureau of the Census, the U.S. Department of Justice, the National Center for Education Statistics, and the U.S. Geological Service. Since it has "an official federally recognized name", as per the USGS, it passes GEOLAND's populated, legally recognized places criteria. It also comes up in other geo database searches (although with very little info, simply proof of existence), such as https://www.viamichelin.com/web/Maps/Map-Desert_Village_Mobile_Home_Park-_-Arizona-United_States Michelin. Okay, I think I found the issue, when looking for other sources, I discovered the DEC and DMS coordinates in USGS don't match: when using DMS, it gives a location further west, near Apache Junction, while when using DEC the location is more east, in Mesa.  SportingFlyer's source absolutely shows nothing there, when using DMS, but when using DEC, it brings up the correct location, supported by those other database sources, as well as Neighborhood Scout.  I've changed the coords to DEC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: per nom. Another non-notable "neighborhood". Being listed in the GNIS database does not confer "legal recognition", therefore fails  as having insufficient coverage as "subdivisions, business parks, housing developments," etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)