Deletion of List of cruelty to animal incidents in Canada

Comment: the nominator's statement rings true based on the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_cruelty_to_animal_incidents_in_Canada&diff=560000673&oldid=560000029 genesis of this article which was basically a cut-paste combination of the two articles deleted by |community consensus only three days earlier. This is basically a matter of G4 via different means and is pretty poor form. The handful of minor cases added since to make this article more substantive isn't convincing. This is just a way to sidestep  by 'ing unrelated cases together to form an article. Delete this and trout/reprimand the creator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS||WP:BLP1E||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: This is just a  for a lot of non-notable |news stories
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: for ridiculous BLP concerns and the article's fundamental nature as, as Laurent puts it, a coatrack for |news stories. Or maybe merge to List of bad people, or perhaps List of things some seriously evil jerks did. Or wait no just delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I am pretty much opposed to any "list of every incident of a very common type ever" on general principle, and this one is obviously a  hornet's nest and an obvious 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Yes, previous deletions of the individual articles about the ''persons'' per  made sense. Conversely an article on ''the events'' is instead perfectly allowed and allowable. In fact,  explicitly says: {{tq|In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article.}} - This is exactly what has been done here: even better, instead of having single event articles of dubious individual notability, a stronger list has been made. Therefore it is absolutely misleading and improper to refer of the deletion of the individual entries: information which is not suited to its own article can be instead be destinated to a comprehensive, larger article (per  as well). I agree entries should be trimmed, but this is a mere editing issue. So far everything seems fairly sourced, so I see no serious  issue here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E||WP:PRESERVE||WP:BLP)