Deletion of Alix Rosenthal

Comment: In response to the comment above, I have done two things to conform to the &E proposition: (1) I created an article for the San Francisco, California, election, 2006|San Francisco, California 2006 election; (2) I edited the article on Alix Rosenthal to conform to the "independent, verifiable information" rule in the the &E proposition by taking out any information that is not in the San Francisco Department of Election voter pamphlet, which is now cited in the article, with one exception: her endorsements; however, these can be verified on the websites of the endorsing organizations, all of which are cited.  This local election is noteworthy because it is an election for the legislative body of a major city; this is on par with an election for mayor.  There are articles on Wikipedia on the local elections for similar legislative bodies of cities like Portland, Oregon and Metro election, 2006|Portland, Oregon.  Likewise, there is an article on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and with the exception of two members, articles on each member of that the Board. I don't see why candidates who run against them in elections cannot have articles, as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:C)

Comment: Lexis-Nexis search confirms nom's suspicion of failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Forgetting &E for a moment, can you say why she passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:BIO)