Deletion of Nicole Simonsen

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: I think at some point we need to look at the fact that  has issues with Wikipedia:Systemic bias|systemic bias and is going to lead to systematically less coverage of women athletes. This is problematic. As NZFC points out, the league considers itself professional.  One can make arguments about the amount of money meaning they have to work second jobs so they aren't professional, or that the league does not receive as much media coverage -- but equally these reasons can all come back to concerns of systemic bias.  It's absolutely true that one individuals AfD isn't the best place to talk about these broader issues.  That being said, I think this is a conversation that needs to be had, and we need to look at addressing 's gender imbalance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: per  failure. It's not a fully-professional league, so the first 'keep' !vote should be discounted as being clearly in error (the W-League is listed at  in the non fully-professional category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL)

Comment: First it's not a fully professional league: https://www.adelaideunited.com.au/news/checker-hopes-w-league-becomes-fully-professional-future Second she hasn't played in a fully professional league, so at best this would be a draftify - but the only thing I can find on her are a couple routine articles talking about how she signed for the Wanderers. I've been on the record saying I don't think NFOOTY works very well for women's leagues, but she doesn't come close to passing  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)