Deletion of Jennifer Lyon (3rd nomination)

Comment: Many reliable sources discuss her life. Here are a bunch of sources not currently used in the article: http://www.tvguide.com/news/jennifer-lyon-dies-1013992.aspx ''TV Guide'' obit, http://www.accesshollywood.com/survivor-star-jennifer-lyon-dies-jeff-probst-shares-his-memories_article_27966 ''Access Hollywood'' obit, http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/jennifer-lyon-survivor-palau-dies-37-breast-cancer-article-1.461136 ''New York Daily News'' obit, http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2010-01-20-jennifer-lyon-obit_N.htm ''USA Today'' obit, http://www.cbsnews.com/news/survivor-contestant-jennifer-lyon-dies/ CBS obit, and the http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/20/jennifer-lyon-dead-surviv_n_429878.html ''Huffington Post'' obit. The sources which ''are'' used in the article (''People'' magazine, ''US'' magazine, etc.) already establish notability per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly meets the  in terms of significant coverage in reliable sources.  Why is this even here at all, much less for a third time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Clearly meets our inclusion guideline .  There are a number of sources which solely cover her found in the article (including People).  I don't see how this is debatable. That much (though certainly not all) of the coverage came after she died isn't relevant--there is clearly coverage in multiple reliable sources ''in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Judging by the RS, her celebrity was quite evidently extended beyond her appearance on the show. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)