Deletion of Irene Tomaszewski

Comment: I'm not seeing enough coverage to pass . Ideally for an author you'd like to have at least one published book with enough notability to have its own article - I don't see that either. Her interesting prison camp backstory suggests that there should be some media interest, like with Irène Némirovsky, and I just don't see that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The references here are doing nothing to establish her notability at all — they're all either |primary sources, or pieces of her own writing. But a person does not get over  by being the ''author'' of |reliable source coverage of other ''things''; she gets over GNG by being the ''subject'' of reliable source coverage written by other ''people''. The sources here simply aren't cutting it at all, and nothing claimed in the body text is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her sources from having to cut it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: tq|established authors of books and articles that are well cited...}} is a criteria applied to academics, under . The subject does not meet this guideline, and being cited does not {{tq|easily meet }}. For , we'd need substantive third-party reviews, which I missing in this case. If they exist, I would be happy to review them. I was not able to find any
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Borderline passes  - has authored several books, including in English, and they are being cited (just click Google Scholar link at the top of the AfD). Few dozen citations in total, according to GScholar. Borderline, yes, but I lean on the inclusionist side here. PS. The article creator has not been notified of this AFD, a technical oversight that should require relisting after the notification. PPS. Since the author is currently topic banned from commenting here, if this is deleted, I will pre-emptively ask on their behalf to userfy it for them in their userspace so they have an option to improve it in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: does not meet  with one book, which did not receive substantive third-party reviews (or at least I could not find any). The book being cited does not help notability, as we'd need discussion ''of'' the book, not citations. ''Cosmopolitan Review'' appears to be a nn publication, so being an editor does not help either. Bottom line, there's insufficient coverage of the subject to sustain this BLP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: established author. Passed and  and subsequently . Some author are not that social
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:BIO)