Deletion of Christian Ortez

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources  to establish notability as required by  and .  Googling suggests there aren't any.  As Cindamuse explained, notability has a much more technical definition on WP than many new editors expect.  It's not enough that the subject ''seems'' notable, i.e., worthy of note.  To be notable on WP, other people with no connection to the subject have to ''actually take note'' and they have to do it in reliable sources.  But take heart, n article about yourself is nothing to be proud of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:A)

Comment: I'm afraid this article fails |wikipedia's standards for notability of biographies and thus should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Notability is '''|not inherited'''. Personal and/or professional associations with prominent persons do not establish notability. Could not find references to support claim of being honored as "U.S. Army Athlete of the Year". Notability is additionally not established through |significant coverage in reliable and independent secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:N|Notability'' is a metric term used on Wikipedia to identify topics warranting an encyclopedia article. In general, notability is an attempt to assess whether the topic has "enduring notability", as evidenced by |significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic. Stating that a subject lacks notability as it relates to Wikipedia guidelines is not a statement made to discredit the individual in any way. While an individual may be successful, prominent, or important in their profession and personal endeavors, they may still lack ''notability'', as defined by the community guidelines for editing Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)