Deletion of The Appointed Time

Comment: Doesn't pass , no sources at all besides writer's own blog.  And yeah, there's pretty clearly self-promotion going on, although in this case lack of notability is clear enough that that isn't the primary reason for deletion by a long shot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: How about assuming a bit of good faith? This nomination appears to be rooted in a lot of hostility. Rather than jumping the gun and going straight to AFD, wouldn't it be preferable to tag the article for notability issues and allow the article's creator an opportunity to source the material? No offense, but the editor would appear to be a brand new user and it doesn't appear that any attempt has been made to communicate with them. Let's not  the newbies. The page may not ultimately meet Wikipedia's otability guidelines, but in fairness, I think we should give the author some opportunity to improve it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:N)

Comment: seems unlikely to pass . Unsure that protection/salting is really necessary at this time, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)