Deletion of Greg Dalby

Comment: per ; being contracted to a fully professional team is not enough, he ''must'' play a competitive game in order to be considered notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: per . Although he fails the professional test, his amateur achievements appear to be at the highest level
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: unless notability is established (and concerns in this AFD are attended to swiftly). Fails several inclusion criteria such as  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Fails  and consensus is that youth caps do not confer notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: If we were talking just football players, then we should be using  and this would be a non-issue, however I've been told by you all time and time again that we can't use  because it doesn't have wider consensus, and therefore we must use  from which it appears he is notable by his amateur status
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN||WP:FOOTYN||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Dalby isn't "auto-notable" under  today, but enough non-trivial es about him come up in a Gnews search that I believe the subject passes general notability requirements (based on media attention to his career thus far) without needing to fall back on the Athlete criteria.  Yes, the article needs better sourcing, but that's fixable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:RS)