Deletion of Speaking Moistly

Comment: to COVID-19 pandemic in Canada#Public health, neither of the |3 possible options for possible notability are met, but this is ''slightly'' relevant for that section of the pandemic article (where it's already mentioned), though I don't think the reception part is necessary. If this charts (I doubt it will), please let me know and I will switch my vote to keep
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: Significant amount of sources have been added since the nomination, does now pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As Kbabej mentioned above, there are many  news articles talking about the song
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: easily fails . This is a one-off trivial edit that got some views on the Internet, and it fails all three criteria of notability. Not encyclopedic. Special:Contributions/103.42.214.85|103.42.214.85
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSINGLE)

Comment: to COVID-19 pandemic in Canada#Public health or Justin Trudeau: Per . Best to discuss the song in any of the articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: while this is silly, that does not change the fact that it passes . It received coverage over a period of over a month, so it clearly meets the  time constraint. Many delete votes are simply variations of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)