Deletion of Jonathan Marwick

Comment: as |he is only notable for one event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: comparing an academic contest for kids with the Olympics is just silly, and trying to shoehorn this in under sports guidelines is simply absurd.  Bottom line: fails , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Marwick lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. The comparison to  stated above does not make him notable. Student sports are not the top level. International Biology Olympiad is a student comp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: The gold medal in the biology olympiad thing is questionable.  I don't think it asserts notability, but it's arguable (although it doesn't look like any other past winners have articles).  The fault in the  analogy is that I don't think that this contest represents a "major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level", seeing as how it's only open to high school students.  However, even if you can prove that winning the olympiad ''is'' notable, then you're still going to get held up by .  I'm amazed that the prod was removed on this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Winning a Gold Medal at the International Biology Olympiad is enough in itself to satisfy notability requirements. It is analogous to  where sports figures are presumed notable if they have ''participated'' in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level such as the Olympics.  And Marwick did more than just participate - he won Gold
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)