Deletion of Late One Night

Comment: fully meets , it is properly citated and descriptive, and I feel it does fully meet the requirements for . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: as  is a poor deletion rationale, |multiple reliable sources are available with |due diligence, and nominator's |well-meant nomination shows a misunderstanding of the |applicable |notability guidelines. Also, nom's recent spat of prods and noms being directed at Christian-related topicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dkchana is quite worrisome
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:NRVE||WP:BEFORE||WP:AGF||WP:GNG||WP:NF)

Comment: No indication that nominator has done any |due diligence and his edits exhibit a pattern that puts |good faith to the test.  There are plenty of sources found by http://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Late+One+Night%22&num=50#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&safe=off&source=hp&q=%22Late+One+Night%22+-wikipedia+%22Dave+Christiano%22&pbx=1&oq=%22Late+One+Night%22+-wikipedia+%22Dave+Christiano%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=1&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=3339l7540l0l7819l5l5l0l0l0l0l2286l2286l9-1l2l0&fp=1&biw=1680&bih=935&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&cad=b|google but I don't have time to sort out which ones are reliable enough to include in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AGF)