Deletion of Israel News Agency (3rd nomination)

Comment: and correct, as I voted already the last time. Remove Promotional content. Ensure . Confirm provided references and sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: If the fact that a search engine picks it up is its claim to notability, then it really needs to go. More importantly, it's not doing so great with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: until Wikipedia:Reliable sources|Reliable sources exist and article is |verifiable. Article also appears to be  in that it's an ''advertisement masquerading as articles'', as has been admitted on the actual website. (''Why does the Israel News Agency desire to have a place on Wikipedia? Simply because Wikipedia has become the number one spammer on the Internet. And the Israel News Agency, whose mission since 1995 has been to disseminate news directly from the Israel Government Press Office and features from professional journalists in Israel needs to reach a global public. Even if it means using Wikipedia as a tool to educate the world public on current events in Israel.''www.israelnewsagency.com/wikipediacorruptioncensorshipisraelnews480710.html). Article in it's current state fails  as ''This criterion excludes: Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.'' Article does not give an in-line or external reference to a third party reliable source that is independent of the site and has written non-trivial works that focus upon the site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:SPAM||WP:WEB)