Deletion of Crons

Comment: per the multiple in-depth reliable sources found by Northamerica1000. These are more than sufficient to meet the notability threshold per . Notability coupled with the  for article improvement suggests keeping the article. Regarding the discussion here and at other recent corporate AfDs, I explicitly reject the assertion that all business journalism is PR bunk. ''All'' reliable sources have potential context and framing issues and should be considered on a case by case basis. There are enough basic uncontroversial facts to glean from the RS above to write a short reasonably neutral article on the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: Meets . See below in the box for some source examples. I read the sources too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: the mentions are trivial, and insufficient to meet  as the coverage does not address the topic directly and in detail. For example, the ''USA Today'' coverage is largely a name check around the company's promotional campaign
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Below are more sources (in addition to those I posted above) that provide coverage about Crons. More evidence that the company meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: this company appears to meet  based on this http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/sports/ncaabasketball/18morris.html?_r=0 New York Times piece, which provides , as well as this http://content.usatoday.com/communities/gameon/post/2011/03/nike-adidas-under-armourand-crons/1#.V_PW_bXvOac USA Today piece and this http://www.post-gazette.com/business/2014/02/21/Former-Pitt-player-s-apparel-company-takes-aim-at-the-nutrition-bar-market/stories/201402210053 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette piece
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Regarding the ''Forbes'' source I posted above, such sources are allowed to be used, per . Also note that the article is written by a ''Forbes'' staff writer (it states "Forbes Staff"). I read the article before posting it here. Please assume good faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NEWSBLOG)