Deletion of Sensory integration therapy

Comment: Well, it's frightful, somewhat promotional (I've cut some of the worst of it), dreadfully written, and (shh!) doesn't seem to work despite vigorous but largely unscientific attempts to demonstrate that it has any kind of benefit. It thus seems very close to  and , not to mention  and  if we're into policy acronyms. However, this flaky stuff does exist out there in the world, including in numerous NHS trusts (local health bodies in the UK), which may have accepted it more or less uncritically. I think we should deal with it sceptically, citing reliable sources, as we do with topics like Astrology. The current article needs to behas been extensively rewrittencut down, so we have the choice of  (delete, start over) ormight as well keeping it and reroofing the house from the inside
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE||WP:ADV||WP:COI||WP:TNT)

Comment: Covered in decent  so passes  - woo but notable woo. I've cut a load of crappy content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:GNG)