Deletion of UPS Airlines Flight 1354

Comment: to UPS Airlines, because  and  are not met. We can only take into account what information is currently available, and should refrain from speculate about possible future developments (read  if you are interested in further information on that matter). This aviation accident has received media coverage only during its immediate aftermath, which shows that there has not been any lasting significance. The fact that there is an ongoing NTSB investigation must not be used as an argument for alleged notability, because (as it has been pointed out above) ''any'' aviation incident produces some kind of response by the regulatory authorities. The existence of such a report can therefore be considered ''routine'', and should not be used as ''sole argument'' to establish notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per , and I strongly disagree with the previous argument: that article does not simply reflect an exagerated media coverage. Possibly coverage of that accident has taken more resonance because of the short interval of time that separated the Asiana Airlines Flight 214 accident from it, and perhaps more attention I'm meaning care from some commentators but it has not been ''inflated''. Any airliner crashing the way UPS Airlines 1354 did would have caused that same shock amongst "aviation accident fanboys" in any circumstances, not to mention the professionals, and receive the same kind of media coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Appears to fail  as the nominator noted -- the event has, presently, no evidence of a LASTING effect, and the news coverage does not appear to be INDEPTH, or have PERSISTENCE. I don't see why the topic can't receive an encyclopedic treatment in the main UPS Airlines article. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: to UPS Airlines#Major incidents and accidents, per . This would retain the content for later expansion as a standalone article if/when notability is clearer
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)

Comment: A fatal crash of a widebody aircraft is definitely notable; a crash of this nature in the developed world is a significant occurrence, regardless of whether it was a passenger or freight airline. Wikipedia contains lots of articles about comparable (in terms on notability) crashes, so I believe that  applies, and as it states, 'Common sense is above any policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE)