Deletion of Thorn Cycles

Comment: There are no good sources cited. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: thanks for bringing this source in sight. That's one to begin with. We definitely need more to qualify for notability as per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: There something here, though maybe not Thorn Ltd itself but its products and/or SJS cycles, which would probably be best incorporated in a single article per , and which may need a title change. Like most cycling-related topics any material isn't going to be low-hanging fruit in the usual online sources, but may require a little digging. There's some reasonable secondary coverage https://www.cyclinguk.org/sites/default/files/document/migrated/publication/200909060.pdf here for example to help establish notability (for SJS as a "nationally significant mail order supplier of bikes and bits"). I'll dig around for more
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)