Deletion of Fight Club in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: per #INDISCRIMINATE. Even if not for that, this article is very poorly referenced. If a given episode of "All My Chldren" has a Fight Club reference, then by all means give us the original broadcast date of the episode where that happened.  That goes for every other example cited in this indiscriminate list too. Take the more truly notable ones that ''are referenced'' and merge them into the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: WP:TRIVIA, #INFO, etc, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: because this is a #DIR|directory of |indiscriminate details that have no attributable real-world context.  It's essentially trivia in disguise, and trivia should be avoided in not just sections, but as whole articles.  If prose could be written based on attributable sources that offer commentary on the film's impact -- and not the |firsthand observations of the editors themselves -- then such an article will be welcome.  This does not appear to be the case at all, and I doubt that tagging the article with clean-up tags will procure anything similar to my suggestion.  As with the growing trend of giving "Entity in popular culture" articles the boot lately, this article does not have any encyclopedic value to preserve
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IINFO||WP:OR)

Comment: Fight Club in popular culture has not been able to exercise any sort of notability as an article.  Under , "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.  'Significant coverage' means that '''sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content.''' Significant coverage is more than trivial but less than exclusive." (Bolding is mine.)  Furthermore, the note for that particular passage says, "Note 1: Examples: The 360-page book by Sobel and the 528-page book by Black on IBM are plainly non-trivial. '''The one sentence mention by Walker of the band Three Blind Mice in a biography of Bill Clinton (Martin Walker. "Tough love child of Kennedy", The Guardian, January 6, 1992. ) is plainly trivial.'''"  (Bolding is mine again.)  There is no notability established by providing an indiscriminate list of trivia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)