Deletion of Jody Byrne (academic)

Comment: under  ("relatively unknown, non-public figure, where the subject has requested deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL)

Comment: This |autobiography shouldn't have been created in the first place and if you want it deleted I'm not going to oppose. On the other hand, your publication record is a fairly convincing pass of our |notability guidelines for academics, so you should bear in mind that there's nothing stopping another editor from re-creating an article about you, or indeed saving and updating this one. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: I'm not persuaded by arguments that Byrne passes , because a) he has an h-index of only 8, far short of what is needed to fulfill #C1, http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=zAbjo84AAAAJ&hl=en and b) anyone can join the ISTC as a fellow for 108 British pounds https://www.istc.org.uk/product/fellow/. He may have written one significant publication in the field, but that falls far short of fulfilling #C1, and I am not seeing any evidence of meeting any other notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: The fact that it should have been deleted long ago as a promotional and borderline-notable autobiography doesn't obviate the additional justification for deleting it under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL)

Comment: per , if subject's identity can be confirmed. Otherwise, I second Joe Roe. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BIODEL)