Deletion of Carlos Xuma

Comment: I agree with most of the criticisms of the article, and I disagree that the critics are acting in bad faith. I just wish they would start by suggesting improvements on the talk page, rather than hitting the AFD button. In this case, criticisms of the article notwithstanding, there actually ''are'' |reliable sources available on this subject. Five minutes of Googling revealed a mention of Xuma in http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-1501790_ITM this news article; it requires a library card # to access, but the relevant text is here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Xuma's frequent appearances as an expert on the field establish his notability. This is an article that needs drastic improvement, but that is never a valid argument for deletion. I would have replied to our nominator's argument re TV appearances with the customary inapplicability of , but in this case I look forward to seeing the Otto4711 article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)