Deletion of Scott Wilson (ice hockey born 1992)

Comment: It's true that he doesn't meet  but an argument can be made that he meets . http://collegehockeyinc.com/articles/developing-story-scott-wilson This, http://www.westerncollegehockeyblog.com/2013/4/3/4180050/ncaa-frozen-four-2013-pittsburgh-connections-scott-wilson-jesse-root this, http://penguins.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=619859 this and http://triblive.com/sports/college/ncaa/3795481-74/wilson-lowell-scott#axzz2VXTpu4Y4 this constitutes coverage about Wilson specifically in reasonably reliable sources. http://insidepittsburghsports.com/story/prospect-buzz-umass-lowells-scott-wilson-viewed-as-a-legitimate-prospect-in-the-penguins-system/56667/ This is a little weaker but it's not completely insignificant. He also got some media coverage when he won rookie of the year (http://www.insidehalton.com/sports-story/2895656-wilson-hockey-east-rookie-of-week/ example). All in all, I think he just barely passes the bar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG)

Comment: I think Djsasso is correct, this subject does not (|at present) meet our current criteria for notable Hockey players. That said, I kinda want to keep him based on the awards. But that's why we have criteria, I guess. Does the team have an article for its ground-breaking 2012-2013 season? Expanded discussion there might be a way to go, as discussing the contributions of individual players would fit well with a narrative about a good year for the program
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Usual caveats (WP:USUAL)