Deletion of Finland does not exist

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Per . Article gives way too much weight to a joke/hoax and takes it seriously. Article is written as if the theory is quite possibly true. There has been nowhere near enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Full disclosure: I wrote it.) Here's the nickle summary: 1) the article meets . 2) we have hundreds and hundreds of articles in :Category:Internet memes, therefore 3) arguments for deletion must address why ''this particular'' GNG-meeting article should be singled out for deletion from :Category:Internet memes, and 4) no such argument has been persuasively advanced and probably can't be. QED: keep. (The argument could instead be made that :Category:Internet memes should be cleared out generally; since this would involve mass-deletion of hundreds of articles this would be some heavy lifting and would require a differently-structured discussion, and anyway that argument has also not been made here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am somewhat surprised that editors with at least some experience seem to think that being mentioned in the news is enough. It's not, please see  which clearly states '''"An event must receive significant or in-depth coverage to be notable"'''. We are nowhere near that here. While The Guardian is a good source, the fact that this joke has been mentioned in passing (in a list of a long row of other joke conspiracy theorists) doesn't come even near noticeable coverage. As for the other sources, they are either not really noticeable or they focus on the artist whose exhibition this is and would ''maybe'' be an argument for an article on the artist, but not on this. Once again, being mentioned in the news is ''not'' automatically an argument for being notable by Wikipedia standards. Especially not when the coverage is this limited
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COVERAGE)

Comment: I sincerely hope that if this article is kept, it will be rewritten, massively, to give off the impression that it is just a joke / internet meme, and not a conspiracy theory which might quite possibly be true. I understand that to an average dumb US American who has never left their country and has absolutely zero knowledge of the outside world, this "theory" might seem remotely plausible, but to anyone with more than a few brain cells to rub together, it is completely absurd, and it is even more completely absurd that  disallows us from having proper overviews of topics like reiki as any sources that do anything other than criticise the "fringe theory" are not considered reliable, yet this 110% patently incoherent "theory" - which I can only assume is a joke, written by someone who wants to troll dumb Americans - is being given a soapbox tax-free and looks like it will be allowed to remain... unbelievable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)