Deletion of Nick Lovegrove

Comment: Looking through sources -- of course we can't seriously consider the subject's own website, Facebook page or blog-hosted resumé, collectively cited over two dozen times -- I see an awful lot of passing mentions or opinions provided by this guy on one event or anoher. But I don't see a heckuva lot ''about'' him and his life. ''Fortune'' 1990 is a perfect case in point: "...BSB agreed to pay as much as $800 million...for exclusive film rights, estimates Nick Lovegrove, a principal in McKinsey & Co.'s London office...." Really? This, and using two book reviews of a single book for 16 footnotes, is symptomatic of mining for dribs and drabs to puff up the reference count we have seen in other places, invariably |conflicted, and it's not sound article building. The creator's cries of wikihounding are a distraction and irrelevant to the article's merits.  and let somebody else build it instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:TNT)