Deletion of Sino-American War

Comment: and cleanup per Uncle G. This AfD debate is a spectacular demonstration of how our eyes too often allow us to see only what we want to see and nothing else: #CBALL|"If preparation for the event isn't already in progress, speculation about it must be ''well documented''." And this one ''is'' well-documented
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World War III for another brilliant application of #CBALL
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Various authors of books have conducted original research and written about a possible Sino-American War.  This article is about the concept of such a war, not about the (nonexisting) war itself!  The article is well-sourced and  is utterly inapplicable here as there are more than enough secondary sources ''about this subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: WP:NOR|Original research and |crystal balling. Besides, we could make up hypothetical wars all day long: the Helvetic-United State|American War, the Greece|Greco-Tibet|Tibetan War, the Samoa-Latvia|Latvian War, the Russia|Ruso-Uruguay|Uruguayan War, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)