Deletion of List of mechanical keyboards (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per , ''"One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list"''. Mechanical keyboards have been discussed as a group by reliable sources as discussed in the previous AFD. Lack of exhaustiveness/lack of maintenance is not a . Wikipedia is not a catalogue, but this article is not written in catalogue style and as such this does not apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:DELREASON)

Comment: per  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTCATALOGUE)

Comment: The article doesn't include prices for the keyboards which does not make it a buyer's guide. Everything in the article is backed up by sources. The list passes , without a hitch. There aren't any good points made by the nominator nor participants to delete the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: The hostility to this topic seems odd when here we are, all using keyboards.  Familiarity breeds contempt, I suppose.  Anyway, the topic easily passes  – see ''https://uk.pcmag.com/keyboards/84334/the-best-mechanical-keyboards PC News'', for example.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing not deletion per ; ; ; ; &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:ATD||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)