Deletion of Mr. Roboto Project (2nd nomination)

Comment: this was kept easily a few years ago and I expect it to be kept again (especially since the nomination isn't strong), but I'm not sure  is satisfied, even looking at the old AfD. I really don't care which way this one goes at this point but looked at this and wanted to make those points. Also agree with all of the tags currently in the article (, ) which weren't taken care of after the last AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:PROMO||WP:NORG)

Comment: The venue is notable. https://www.pittsburghcurrent.com/a-lack-of-live-shows-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/ 1https://www.wesa.fm/post/mr-roboto-project-host-sexual-violence-prevention-workshops#stream/0 2https://www.pghcitypaper.com/pittsburgh/benefit-compilation-albums-help-support-pittsburghs-the-mr-roboto-project/Content?oid=18493414 3. Based on the references, this is not just some random venue, but have strong significance to punk and DIY culture in the general area. This satisfies  in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm open to arguments about why the first 3 sources provided by Cunard aren't acceptable, but they seem fine--the first in particular.  So meets  and thus our inclusion guidelines. The first source *appears* to be stelar.  It's from the UK and goes into great detail.  If the author of the chapter has a significant COI, that could change things.  I can't find anything about them. Note, per above, I was pinged
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: or clean-up asap, tagged since 2013, problematic issues unaddressed, riddled with , zero use of citations, if so notable the article should reflect this by now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)