Deletion of Adrien Burel

Comment: While it's admirable how hard Mr. Burel has worked to overcome his past, I just can't find where he's been the focus of independent and reliable sources. Most of what I've found has been , meaning that it is a source that was released by either Burel, his school, or other places that are associated with him. I can't really find any evidence of the awards/accolades (going to call it just "award" from here on out) that he's won. This doesn't mean that he may not have been praised for his work or that he hasn't won a contest of some sort, but this almost always means that the award would not be considered to be something that would give notability on Wikipedia. The thing is, most awards aren't considered to be the type that would give notability '''''per Wikipedia's guidelines''''' and I'd say that less than 2% of any award given in any category for any given thing would be the type that would give notability. While there are some rare exceptions, most of the time if an award isn't something that a non-primary source would report on, then it's considered to not be something that would give notability. Now as far as other news sources go, it all depends on the source. Not all news outlets are made equal or considered to be usable for notability and whether or not the source is considered to be usable also depends on what it's reporting. Brief,  mentions of Burel in passing would not really be considered usable and if the article is a reprint of a press release, then it can't be considered to be a reliable source either. There's a lot more to this, so the best thing for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:TRIVIAL)