Deletion of Nicole D. Peeler

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: It's hard to find among all the books-for-sale web sites and bloggy reviews, but I think the reliable sources are out there for a pass of . Four of her novels have been reviewed by ''Publishers Weekly'' https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-316-05657-1 https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-316-05660-1 https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-316-12808-7 https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-316-40735-9, three have been reviewed by ''Romantic Times'' https://www.rtbookreviews.com/book-review/tempest-rising https://www.rtbookreviews.com/book-review/tempest-reborn https://www.rtbookreviews.com/book-review/jinn-and-juice, and she's a three-time nominee for the Romantic Times Reviewers’ Choice Awards http://locusmag.com/2012/11/2012-romantic-times-reviewers-choice-nominees/ http://locusmag.com/2013/11/2013-romantic-times-reviewers-choice-nominees/ https://www.rtbookreviews.com/author/nicole-peeler. There's also some newspaper coverage of her academic activities http://triblive.com/lifestyles/morelifestyles/12451375-74/seton-hill-faculty-co-curate-academic-conference-for-international-vampire-film-and-arts as well as for her (apparently deliberately?) bad sex-scene writing https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/21/books-sex-scenes_n_974490.html, and trade-magazine coverage of her provocative cover art choices https://www.adweek.com/galleycat/why-nicole-peeler-loves-her-cover-art/10548. I think it's enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)