Deletion of Brothers von Blücher

Comment: on account of subject meeting . The three persons that are the subject of the contested article were among the dead from the German side during the Battle of Crete|1941 invasion of Crete. On that basis alone they do not merit an article but the fact of three brothers being killed in the same military operation within days of each other makes the subject evidently notable. They cannot be considered, on the basis of evidence, as independently notable but as a group, as brothers, they certainly are. Read: {{tq|Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign}} and I consider three brothers dying in the same battle together as having played an "important role" in it. Moreover: {{tq|It is important to note that a person who does not meet the criteria mention above is not necessarily non-notable.}} Even if the specific criteria listed in  do not strictly accord notability per se, we must acknowledge the inherent notability of the subject, per above. (|We cannot and I will not invoke articles of similar themes that already exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOLDIER||WP:NSOLDIER||WP:OSE)

Comment: Looking at the links Icewhiz has provided, they are mentioned substantially in both Antill and Beevor, neither of whom are sympathetic to Nazis and who would thus qualify as . The Nisbett book seems to be romanticizing, but the article is actually based on information in Antill and Beevor. Given their mention in a Hitler speech, these brothers would seem to be a similar cause to the Sullivans (not suggesting any moral equivalency), and meet  as a result of the mentions in Antill and Beevor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: sources listed above are in passing and / or unreliable. This is a poorly sourced propaganda legend; does not meet  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:NFRINGE)