Deletion of Things (film)

Comment: Despite COI and sockpuppet issues, I don't see any issues with . I hate giving socks any ground but this article isn't much of a puff piece, the largest section goes into great detail about how awful most people thought the movie was.  not needed. I'll note that although it was a decade ago at this point, there was a previous bundle AfD which decided ''Things'' was notable but Gillis wasn't. I don't think that has changed over the years
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TNT)

Comment: Per Nom. Sorry but I cannot give socks or COI editing any ground. I don't know the reliability of https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikipedia-paid-editing-pr-facebook-nbc-axios_n_5c63321be4b03de942967225 Huffpost but the implications that a COI editor has a close relation to the subject means a possible financial gain so by proxy is COI/paid editing. This automatically calls into question any |neutrality as provided by the |"Five pillars
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:5P2)