Deletion of Why Make Clocks

Comment: I did not consider  in my creation of this article.  While I am not currently involved in the group, I was involved in the past, ergo a possible implication of bias.  A potential remedy could be to remove any reference to myself in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO)

Comment: Having originally prodded the article, I undertook to read up on the band a bit after the tag was removed, and, though I think it's a close call, the band does seem fit the notability criteria of .  Even as http://whymakeclocks.net/reviews.html the band's website has yet to include any reviews from prominent publications and even as the band gets only 729 Ghits, the band's music is http://music.msn.com/playlist?playlist=fc001f00-32db-0000-0000-000000000000 available on MSN Music and Rhapsody.  It's a very close call for me, but, though the article needs a lot of work, it's a weak keep for me for now.  (Btw, for those inclined to vote keep in view of the prospective notability of two blue-linked members, the articles to which "Boonie" and "Eric Kennedy" direct are not about the musicians, and so the "member of another notable music group" criterion wouldn't seem relevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: I might just be voting to keep as a result of my guilt for my impropper handling of this article and my rudeness to its creator; however,  a paper encyclopedia, and I now believe, based upon the assertions by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)