Deletion of Dear (Mika Nakashima song)

Comment: Merge to artist page'''.  Per , not notable. "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article", and I see no reason why this one should be an exception. Charting, or being certified gold, aren't sufficient to pass the NSONGS hurdle.  (They ''do'' indicate that ''Nakashima'' is notable, but not ''this song
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: Macwhiz argued, "Per , not notable. "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article", and I see no reason why this one should be an exception." I think that's an off-the-mark misreading of who to interpret the phrase "most songs." Most songs are non-notable, but most songs are far less notable than this song. There are legions of songs around the world that are released by obscure artists, that sell only hundreds or a few thousand copies, that are never released as singles, do not chart, etc. "Most songs" means most songs in the entire universe of songs, not most songs in the much smaller universe of popular charting songs released as singles by major artists. Macwhiz wrote, "Charting, or being certified gold, aren't sufficient to pass the NSONGS hurdle." However, NSONGS  states, "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts . . . are probably notable" In other words, when a song charts on a national chart, as this song has, there is a presumption of notability. I don't think the presumption of notability can be overcome in this case. Not only did this song chart, it charted in the top ten. Plus, it's apparently by a major artist (five number one albums, plus four more in the top 5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)