Deletion of David Boothroyd (3rd nomination)

Comment: this individual has been noted in several |reliable sources concerning his political activities in Westminster and is now receiving attention for his http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/26/wikipedia_westminster_councillor/ activities on Wikipedia as well.  The article existed for several years until he stepped down from ArbCom and we should not delete an article to "protect one of our own" now that new media coverage is taking place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: councillors are generally not notable. This one is no exception: he fails , lacking sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources. Nothing significant has changed in that respect from the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination)|last AFD on May 23rd. The ''only'' in-depth coverage is from The Register; unless someone can demonstrate that more exists, this article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)