Deletion of International cricket in 2003

Comment: I believe these are acceptable under  as they contain descriptive prose (or links to "See Also"s with prose). These aren't statistics, they're logs, which are a little different. I try not to stick my grubby mitts into sports stuff here, but I'm a sucker for data scrounging and summary like this. Take my input with a grain of salt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: Breach of , especially  and . All of this information belongs in the respective season or tour reviews in suitably summary form. An annual collection of bare statistics is what people look for on specialist sites like ''CricketArchive'' and ''ESPNcricinfo''. Articles on WP must have narrative to explain both concept and context. These stats are of no use to anyone who is unfamiliar with cricket and of little if any interest to cricket followers too. A complete waste of space and, unfortunately, something we in  are finding all too often
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:DIRECTORY||WP:CRIC)