Deletion of William S. Bloxsom-Carter

Comment: I neutralized the language in the lead, and completely removed the section about the B&B because it seemed irrelevant to a biography. What remains is a stub about a chef, so I tagged it accordingly. As to notability, our guidelines don't require that a person be notable throughout his career, so I don't see that as an issue. Significant coverage is sufficient. The question is, is the coverage of this chef along the lines of what one would expect for a chef, or is the coverage beyond "par for the course" for this topic? The closest guideline we have may be , which suggests that this creative professional isn't notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I am finding somewhat significant coverage of Mr. Bloxsom-Carter over a period of years, from 2011 to the present, not just passing mentions, but focus articles, such as http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-09-12/hugh-hefner-dines-late-likes-chops-says-playboy-mansion-chef-interview this from Bloomberg and http://hauteliving.com/2011/09/hugh-hefner%E2%80%99s-eating-habits-according-to-playboy-mansion-chef/199384/ this from ''Haute Living'', both focused on his work as a chef at the Playboy Mansion, plus mentions of his wine judging, such as http://www.intowine.com/qa-chef-william-s-bloxsom-carter-executive-chef-and-food-and-beverage-director-playboy-mansion-west this from Into Wine and http://www.pressdemocrat.com/csp/mediapool/sites/PressDemocrat/News/story.csp?cid=1862717&sid=555&fid=181 this from the ''Santa Rosa Press Democrat''. Passing mentions of his role of chef include one from the Examiner (www.examiner.com/article/ronnie-james-dio-cancer-fund-hosts-first-awards-gala-at-playboy-mansion - a blacklisted source) and even, in Spanish, http://www.caras.cl/sociedad/hugh-hefner-y-el-fin-del-nido-de-amor/ this from ''Caras'' (with the interesting title ''Hugh Hefner y el fin del nido de amor'' (''Hugh Hefner and the end of the love nest''). I am concerned that the creator is a |single purpose account, that I did not find more sources across several gSearches and also with the overly promotional nature of the article, especially the section focused on the promotion of the bed-and-breakfast, which I don't see mentioned in coverage of the article subject. (I suppose it's his retirement plan, what with the Mansion closing and all.) That part of the article does lack |reliable sourcing. That latter focus of the article and the relative paucity of sources for what is reportedly a 25+ year career is why I ended up !voting to delete. At a minimum, I'd suggest removing or heavily editing/sourcing the B&B part if the article remains
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:RS)