Deletion of Parveen Kaur (Canadian actress)

Comment: The notability test for an actor or actress is not the ''number'' of roles they've had — an actress can be notable for just one role if she got a Canadian Screen Award or Academy Award nomination for it, and an actor can be ''non-notable'' for ''100'' roles if they were all walk-on and bit parts. The notability test for an actress is the amount of |reliable source coverage she's received ''for'' having acting roles — but BrixtonTown is not providing reliable sources that are substantively ''about'' her. Mere casting announcements don't cut it, because any actor who gets any role can always show those; video clips of her being interviewed on ''CP24 Breakfast'' don't cut it, because she's speaking about ''herself'' rather than being discussed in the third person by people other than her; profiles in directories like IMDb or Northern Stars don't cut it, because every actor who fits the directory's criteria indiscriminately gets a profile; mere mentions of her existence in coverage of the film or TV show she was in don't cut it, because that's not substantively about her; blogs like ''The Teal Mango'' don't cut it because they're ''blogs''; marketing profiles on the websites of film festivals her films have appeared at don't cut it, because those are provided by the actress's own PR agent and not written independently. Reliable sourcing is not necessarily the same thing as just ''any'' source that verifies that she ''exists'': ''all'' possible sources of information do not count equally as builders of notability. Only certain specific kinds of sources, namely ''media'' coverage ''about her'', do that, but the ones being shown here aren't the correct kinds
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)