Deletion of Men in skirts

Comment: The article consists of |original research because its primary assertion &mdash; that there is a notable movement to get modern-day Western men to wear skirts &mdash; has no |sources listed. The only sources are for unrelated or tangentially-related facts: men in some non-Anglo-American cultures wear (or once wore) unbifurcated clothing, some young boys were once dressed in skirts because their parents couldn't afford male-specific clothing, and one school in England had to change their dress code because of a lawsuit. This article isn't describing a trend; it is making a case for something the authors want to happen, but hasn't yet happened or even received any prominent attention yet. If this alleged phenomenon itself is actually written up in reliable sources, re-create the article then, and make it sound less like a soapbox. Oh, and remove the silly Star Trek trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:RS)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as blathery , but replace with the good rewrite. We'll be able to cut down on this stuff in the main articles, then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: the sourced sections, '''IF''' there isn't too much overlap with kilt and skirt and dress#Male wear, '''Delete''' the |OR and unsourced sections, and strongly consider '''Rename''', though I don't have a distinct preference for which name to change it to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: The stuff about the "MIS movement" is completely unsourced, and is pretty much a rehash of the "Male Unbifurcated Garment"/"Men's Fashion Freedom" silliness that's been deleted many times over. Much of the remaining content, namely the ''Legal Position in the UK'' section, contains a lot of original research via |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)