Deletion of Weapons and items from The Legend of Zelda series

Comment: Just because it is interesting and useful does not mean it is encyclopedic according to Wikipedia guidelines. See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: The only time  mentions games guides is under the Instruction manuals section. ''While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instructions or advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s.'' This is none of those things.  It would only violate policy if it included a guide on how to get these items, suggestions on how/where to use them, or advice on how to use them. An article ''about'' these items does not violate policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: in response to the MOS point - when the "sheer volume of content is enough to outright disrupt the article" why can't such content just be prunned off wikipedia? Especially when it's cruft, and not notable. Notable game series, yes. But is each item in the Zelda series really notable enough that we have an entry (and in many cases, a picture) in the encyclopedia? I see no point in keeping the article in its current state. It would need a massive cleanup before i would see it as not violating . We don't *need* a list of all weapons and items from Zelda, whether that's an independant list or a list that's part of another article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Given that I'm packing at the moment I don't have time to go into my usual depth of argument.  However, let me summarize as such:  specifically allows for the creation of list articles when the sheer volume of content is enough to outright disrupt the article.  This is one such case.  This article may go into somewhat excessive detail in a few places, but by and large it is perfectly justified.  At most this calls for a cleanup.  Additionally, once the Link fans get wind of this, be prepared to face the reality of . -- |Y'''&#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:SNOW||WP:IKNOWBEST)

Comment: Notable per , game guide elements can be cleaned up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: Clearly against : Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list and not a game guide. This article is literally a game guide covering the entire ''Legend of Zelda'' series and is unhelpful to anyone who hasn't played the games. The article also lacks sources as per  and is probably |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: verifiable, notable. All this article needs is cleanup, and this reads nothing at all like a game guide. And I'm gonna be a bit of a rebel (jokingly) and say |It's useful(I'm just playing!). Image:Wink.gif|20px
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: unnecessary. (also per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V)

Comment: As it stands currently, the article is not (just) a game guide and is an aggregation entries on items from a notable fictional series much as invisioned by .  More clean-up may be desirable but I think that this is a logical and encyclopedic sub-article of Legend of Zelda series that should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per nom and per |Wikipedia is not a game guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)