Deletion of List of trips funded by Jack Abramoff

Comment: to me it is a bit of |soapboxing... as are all the nominated articles.  No offence to the originator, but the sourcing falls short of |verifying the article text in many places.  Still, this might be useful information if it were actually sourced correctly.  I'm tagging the articles now while I think about this a bit more
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V)

Comment: By itself I would say it would fall under , but it is part of a larger series of pages related to the scandal. The information is importaint (I guess, I haven't really followed the scandal), has a narrow focus, and arranged in a useful manner. It certainly needs to be cleaned up, sourced, and expanded, but not deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)