Deletion of Character class (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: I see some of the info is sourced to a UCP book. Depending on how much coverage there is in that book, that could easily pass GNG on its own. I'd also bet there's no shortage of sources like the io9.com site also in the references, although I'm not sure whether that counts as RS. It is a little annoying though that nearly everything in the article is sourced to the publishing company, perhaps some of this coverage is 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: This is a  spinoff from Dungeons & Dragons gameplay, because it would be far too long to cover decades of classes without distracting the flow entirely.  D&D is an exceptionally long-running and influential game, so this level of coverage is appropriate even if tilted to primary sources.  This isn't the equivalent of fancruft of a single video game; this is closer to an entire cultural industry, akin to :Category:Chess openings if a single company owned chess
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARYSTYLE)