Deletion of Semantic parameterization

Comment: seems to be well–referenced and verified. COI may make editing of an article or user conduct problematic, but, remember that it itself is not a valid deletion argument. Also note that |speedy keep does not apply as this seems to clearly be a good faith and not a vexatious nomination. With that being said, we're approaching |blizzard conditions on this discussion, anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:SNOW)

Comment: as |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I don't doubt that this is a legitimate academic concept. I have some reservations about the present author being the one to write the article, since it gives an aura of |ownership or otherwise removing the article from the community. But I agree with Gnfnrf: We're better off having the article than not having it. Because it's on such a technical and academic concept, we should stick with it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)