Deletion of Cheryl Rubenberg

Comment: Criterion 1 of  inquires whether: "The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources."  Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Notes_and_examples #1 notes that "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work." But that is not the only way: "Reviews of the person's work, published in selective academic publications3, can be considered together with ordinary citations here."  Footnote 3 relevantly mentions " ... the content of the review and any evaluative comments made there may be used for that purpose." (of satisfying criterion 1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: GS gives h index = 5, which does not look hopeful for rof
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: as sources found by John Z are enough to satisfy  point 3: "The person has created… a collective body of work, that has been the subject of… multiple independent periodical articles or reviews
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)