Deletion of Jo Pike (2nd nomination)

Comment: Because the case against political notability is so clear-cut, I think the main question is not that, but whether she is academically notable. Senior lecturer is kind of at the borderline level of notability; if she were reader or better professor, I'd be more inclined to expect notability (although that would still have to be proven by some  criterion, as that does not directly consider academic ranks). The article lists two reviews for one book, none for another, and I didn't find any more in my brief searching, but the bigger problem there is that they are edited rather than authored and that doesn't count for as much. So I don't think she passes . And her citation counts on Google scholar are 149, 59, 51, 49, ..., respectable but not enough to convince me of a pass of #C1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: per . Subject in question has not (yet) been elected to any notable position of government
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)