Deletion of All About Jazz

Comment: The |second criterion for website notability is: "The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization". AAJ has won a Jazz Journalists Association award on multiple occasions, as is stated (and sourced) in the article. That's sufficient in itself. As an aside, I'd guess that Wikipedia gets more traffic from the AAJ site than AAJ gets from having a Wikipedia article, so the argument about promotion is weak
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEBCRIT)

Comment: In editing and referencing articles on jazz musicians and their works over the past 11 years, AAJ has always been one of my prime sources, though only its bylined reviews (Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Jazz/Archives/2011_1#Reliable_sources_for_biographies_-_views_sought|previous discussion). Though that may be an  argument, it does indicate some importance in a limited field, which point is I think reflected in the repeated award referenced in the article text and the mainstream press secondary mentions itemised above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:ITSUSEFUL)