Deletion of Anne-Marie Baiynd (2nd nomination)

Comment: but after a full nomination process. The last AfD did not attract much attention and included some laughable comments (she would pass ?? really??) so I don't want to use it as an excuse to shut this one down. I have the strong suspicion that this is part of a big walled garden of day trading operators and web sites that exist to promote each other. The article as nominated (before I just cleaned it out) was a mass of poor-quality web sources and trivial statements sourced to them, with the appearance that the statements were there purely to give an excuse to link to those web sites rather than as a solid source of information about the subject. In short, this all seems heavily promotional, and I can understand the nominator's frustration with the situation. That said, the walled garden appears to extend to enough major media sites (such as ''Forbes'' and the ''Wall Street Journal'' to make her notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)