Deletion of Tim Bowles

Comment: subject's relationship to another notable person does not confer notability. If this "Fishman/Geertz" case makes the subject notable, it should be included in the article, but I couldn't find much verifiable info on this case. Going by the numbers, we have 279 unique Ghits, and as far as I can tell none of these fit  standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Frankly, I might have speedied this if the debate hadn't already existed.  Basically the article says, repeatedly, that this guy is a lawyer for the church of scientology, and ''that's it.''  Why should we care?  |I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground (WP:HOLE)