Deletion of Marijn Backer

Comment: per . Now there are enough reviews (or I guess recencies) to make a second case for  notability beyond the awards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Meets  #4c, has won an important prize and is included in an authoritative lexicon. Backer also meets the basic standard of the . There were no references but per  "The absence of sources or citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that a subject is not notable. Notability requires only the {{em|Wikipedia:Published|existence}} of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or Wikipedia:Citing sources|citation in an article." I added a few references and there are many more sources. I hope that others will add more references. There is absolutely no lack of sources or interest in this Dutch author
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: I doubt he's notable for his work as a schoolteacher but he has a plausible case for notability through : Google Books finds multiple books authored by him, and the two links in the "Awards" section of the article are to notable awards for writing. However we would need to find published reviews of the books or sourcing for the awards to confirm this. As he appears to be writing mainly children's books in Dutch, that probably means that the sources would also be in Dutch (not a problem for using them as sources, but it makes it more difficult for non-Dutch-speakers to find
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: With bios usually a few references support notability and the rest only support data in the article. This article is rare since '''all 15 references support the subject's notability'''. I can add more but time-consuming and the  level was clearly reached. It puzzles me why this article was nominated in the first place. If one does not know how to find references in foreign languages, the correct remedy is adding a {{references}} template. Not AfD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)