Deletion of Universal Coin & Bullion

Comment: Fails . Lots of dependent sources, or interview style article that fails , straight up advertising, press-releases, or source that are very low-quality failing  and primary. Fails , . A small article of little worth, except to the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:DEL14||WP:DEL4)

Comment: If I were reviewing this article as a draft at AFC, I would decline it as failing to address |corporate notability because it is about what the company says about itself, and not what third parties say about the company.  At AFD, this is an article that is about what the company says about itself.  I have notability concerns and tone concerns.  The article contains too much sales talk, including duplicating a reference to its CEO as America's gold expert (and duplication indicates sloppy editing).  I am not making a definite assessment on whether the company is notable, because the article needs to be |blown up and started over
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:TNT)

Comment: per nom ({{U|DGG}}), , and . In 2007, this |could be forgiven, but in 2020 everybody knows we have rules
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:AGF)