Deletion of Karen Arenson

Comment: non-notable person, fails . She has not been the subject of significant coverage from reliable sources; out of the references provided, the only one that could plausibly be called 'significant coverage' is a blog, which flatly fails . The rest are either articles written by her, or brief mentions of her in articles about something else (i.e. the New York Times-Columbia University controversy). It's pretty clear from the sources that it's that controversy which is notable, not Arenson herself. Indeed, this article is basically a |coatrack, which uses Arenson as an excuse to talk about the Columbia University controversy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:COATRACK)