Deletion of Uncle Slam

Comment: I'm sure this vote won't help with consensus but I gotta be honest. Above, Caro7200 mentioned some reviews in reliable sources. The band got lucky with an album review in the Chicago Tribune, but read it here: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1993-02-11-9303177851-story.html. It is one paragraph long, only mentions one song, and uses platitudes like "combination of anger and persistence" that could be said about anyone. Reliable source, but not |significant. On the other hand, reviews at Blabbermouth https://www.blabbermouth.net/cdreviews/say-uncle/ and Decibel https://www.decibelmagazine.com/2012/07/06/the-lazarus-pit-uncle-slam-s-will-work-for-food/ are quite robust. That helps with criterion #1 at , and being signed to two notable labels helps with criterion #5. Having several members that are notable for other endeavors helps with criterion #6 (though this is admittedly a stretch and the notability of some of those people is suspect). Some good news and some bad news in this analysis, but the good manages to squeak past the bad. In any case the article needs to be cleaned up up pretty badly. And their name is brilliant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NBAND)

Comment: Article is good enough to pass  with the sources indicated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND)