Deletion of Ysabella Brave

Comment: Per ,  "If a subject has met the general notability guideline, there is no need to show continual coverage or interest in the topic. LA Times Magazine feature should be enough to met this criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The entire nominating argument is fallacious.The deletion nominator states:''"This person was a popular YouTube performer some time ago and then essentially disappeared from the site long before her channels were deleted.  She had her (well-deserved) moment in the sun, but I don't see how she currently overcomes ."''It appears the nominator is saying that Ysabella Brave '''once''' met notability guidelines, but now she doesn't "currently overcome "The relevant sentence of this three sentence  guideline is this:"If a subject has met the general notability guideline, there is no need to show continual coverage or interest in the topic."In other words, if  Ysabella Brave met the notability guideline before, as the nominator appears to acknowledge, then there doesn't need to be continued media coverage of the subject. Once Ysabella Brave became notable, she remains notable.It troubles me greatly that the nominator quotes a guideline which contradicts the very foundation of his deletion argument.The nominator states: ''"She has released no albums"'', Wikipedia:Notability (music) has no such guidelines.The nominator then acknowledges that Ysabella Brave has been in the most influential newspaper in the country, the New York Times, the NYT seems to find that it is notable enough to mention, but the nominator doesn't. The nominator mentions the LA Times article, the "second-largest metropolitan newspaper in the United States and the fourth-most widely distributed newspaper in the United States".The nominator ignores the local San Diego Daily Transcript.Only on Wikipedia can one single person put an article at jeopardy by arguing the notability of a subject when the most influential newspaper, and the second largest newspaper in the country found the subject to be notable.Not to mention the:Business Wire, and two Globe and Mail articles on Google News.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS289US289&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22Ysabella+Brave%22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP||WP:NTEMP||WP:NTEMP)