Deletion of Elizabeth Klinck

Comment: Winning a Gemini and other awards and being nominated for an Emmy satisfies  #1, and she's received a surprising amount of notice.http://www.hotdocs.ca/i/jots/the-art-of-visual-research-elizabeth-klinckhttps://docorg.ca/en/doc-member-spotlight-elizabeth-klinckhttps://books.google.ca/books?id=azoqBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT78&lpg=PT78&dq=%22Elizabeth+Klinck%22&source=bl&ots=rtMRIUS7pw&sig=fz4bVVbBMLiFzwbJJGN5mZbuX3w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj3iauczazSAhUJxWMKHePmDnU4HhDoAQg0MAU#v=onepage&q=%22Elizabeth%20Klinck%22&f=falsehttps://sheffdocfest.com/speakers/7198
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Ping|Jackjohnnmartin}} I may be wrong and of course I am not outing you but if the fact that your user name is the same as her husband's is just a coincidence it might be useful to state that here but if it isn't I do understand why you are defending your article and that you feel personally slighted by the nomination. it is very difficult to have a |'''Neutral point of view''' when there is a conflict of interest but please don't take this nomination so personally.  Just as a reminder conflict of interests should be accompanied by a isclose|'''disclosure''' on associated talk pages
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:D)