Deletion of Bushism

Comment: per nom. Filled with POV, , poorly sourced, unencyclopedic, and probably violates . I'm not opposed to the topic, per se. But this execution is wrong in so many ways
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:BLP)

Comment: for sure. Plenty of |reliable sources are available to |verify the phrase's use. &middot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: per . There are many verifiable sources for this term, both in the article and above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: as inherently POV, unless there's an article on political gaffes or something like that this can be merged into. Something touching on this topic has a place in an encyclopedia, certainly one that's |not paper, but this particular article, by its very nature, is all "look how stupid George W. Bush is."&ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: libel certainly does not figure in here.  It's very very difficult to commit defamation against a public figure in the United States.  Nothing in the article crosses the line.  So let's just take the legal question out of consideration.  Second, the article is, for the most part, sourced.  Thus these portions of it, including the poem (which is sourced in the reference right above the poem's title), pass muster with  . &middot
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)