Deletion of MyBlackBook

Comment: Highly unencyclopedic in tone and thoroughgoing  problems.  The two short pieces that come nearest to establishing notability both conclude that it isn't a worthwhile service, yet none of that criticism makes its way into the article.  Jehochman establishes that the primary author is the proprietor and (sole?) employee.  Fails corporate notability guidelines, and for those who argue otherwise, better to scrap this PR piece and let an uninvolved editor start from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: by virtue of newly added refs to CNet and Webpronews. Though the username of the article's creator raises |conflict of interest possibility
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Main author left a note on my talk, so here I am.  The article looks like it has problems with |advertising, and |COI, and what really matters: it lacks of independent, |reliable sources.  The citations point to press releases and regurgitated propaganda from the site's promoters.  Fine idea, or not, Wikipedia isn't for advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:COI||WP:RS)