Deletion of Myatt's Fields South Estate

Comment: I thinks we should keep this article first for generally meeting some points of . (And it's not hard rule to meet all). Second, Wikipedia documents history for posterity, this article at least has substantial historical claims which are well sourced. This article may not have the wide  that will convince everybody here to easily change their !vote due to the inherent nature of the subject. And this is clearly reflected in  guideline, it is very relaxed compared to other criteria, because everything is assessed on their on merit and nature, that's why we have tens of specific guidelines and general ones, so that by weighing against varying criteria we come to reasonable conclusion of whether to include or exclude. ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Just a housing estate, with no evidence of notability. The arguments for keeping don't relate to Wikipedia policies. "All Ted Hollamby estates are notable" amounts to . You need to say why they are notable, not just state that they are. "Some are wooden frame which is in itself notable" - again, you have to say why, not just state that it is notable, and in any case are we really to believe that every group of houses which use wooden frames are notable? How many articles on housing estates would we have in that case? The fact that an editor put it in a list of article to be improved is not a proof of notability. The fact that a subject area is "very topical" has no connection to any notability guideline, and the speculation that this "could be" one of the last remaining estates by a particular architect hasn't either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE)

Comment: this is a  housing estate with some coverage about a dispute over maintenance.  I don't think it meet , and it isn't close to being encyclopedic in any other way. There might be a larger topic it could be merged to, but I don't see any that exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:GEOLAND)