Deletion of Charles Dumas (economist)

Comment: Almost all sources cited or |found are about the firm our subject's working in or about other issues, and not about him per se: We have a ''Financial Times'' http://www.ftseglobalmarkets.com/news/lombard-street-research-merges-with-trusted-sources.html article about TS & LSR merging; a ''New York Times'' https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/09/business/europe-recession-coronavirus.html citation that's supposed to impress us but is actually about recession returning to Europe, a text in which Dumas is name-dropped  exactly once; an https://www.aporrea.org/internacionales/a115025.html article in Spanish that appeared in ''Aporrea'' and is about "Perspectivas de la economía mundial en 2011", which we do not really need to translate in English and in which Dumas is name-dropped also once; and so on. Then, lots of listings (e.g. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4370018-china-and-america here or https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Charles+Dumas%22&source=gbs_metadata_r&cad=4 here) of our subject's own writings. (In https://eic.cfainstitute.org/blog/ this conference schedule, which, as a simple list of participants, would not be a significant proof of notability in any case, he is not even mentioned.) This is an effort made by an Special:Contributions/Hannahtsl|editor whose contributions so far have been about our subject or TSL, and in a blatantly |promotional manner too, which never helps, whether |there's a fee involved or not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PROMO||WP:PAID)