Deletion of Laura Vitale

Comment: trivial mentions does not  make
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are editors unfamiliar with the discussion here at articles for deletion.  As some guidance, the key issue is whether the subject meets |notability; notability in this case is not the simple dictionary definition, but rather represents Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines which must be met in order for there to be an article.  This is not a judgment on the subject's accomplishments or abilities.  Note that Youtube, Facebook, Myspace, most blogs, and press releases are not considered to be |reliable sources for the purposes of meeting inclusion guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Despite the cries of  above, the only source I see that comes even remotely close to significant in terms of meeting our notability guidelines is the Forbes article, and she receives only minor mention in that, as one of fifteen cooks mentioned (an interviewer asks here two rather banal questions, which she very briefly answers). The rest of the sources provided and available online are trivial, tangential, or routine mentions, and even taken together don't add up to much. On a scale from 1 to 10 with Jamie Oliver being a 10, she rates about a 0.06 in terms of notability based on the reliable sources available. This may be a case of , but only time will tell. As for now, clearly fails out notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The Forbes piece doesn't quite cut it.  No significant coverage found via Google web, news, books, and scholar searches.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)