Deletion of WAYN (website)

Comment: A well-known website (one of the first social networks, no less, though I've never used it) that has received ample press attention over the years and can be dealt with by normal editing, not TNT. There is nothing so dreadful on this article due to COI editing to warrant deletion; that would be cutting our nose off to spite our face. Sources: http://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2016-02-29/beyond-facebook-the-travel-social-networks-you-need-to-know; http://ventureburn.com/2013/09/social-travel-network-wayn-marks-22-million-registered-travellers/; https://techcrunch.com/2010/05/03/niche-travel-social-network-wayn-hits-profitability-mobile-apps-on-the-way/; http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/roadwarriorvoices/2016/02/16/travel-social-networks/80448712/; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-1190855/Website-week-wayn-com.html; https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=pGxyBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA116; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/2789852/WAYNs-Ward-of-courtship.html; https://gigaom.com/2008/03/17/419-travel-network-wayn-appoints-bank-to-seek-sale-report/; http://thestartupmag.com/qa-session-peter-ward-founder-where-are-you-now/; http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/376c7226-a856-11dc-9485-0000779fd2ac.html?ft_site=falcon&desktop=true#axzz4EhWxTsrw; https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wfkDgc4KnOMC&pg=PA234; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14808977; http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7140599.stm; https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/dec/12/new-york-london-tech-firms; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/bidders-are-circling-round-wayns-world-783203.html; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/5154438/British-social-networking-site-WAYN-takes-on-Twitter.html; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/2786267/Wayn-duo-eye-sale.html; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/8151450/Watch-out-New-York-here-come-Londons-tech-stars.html. Collectively, this coverage passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Passes  per a review of |available sources. The minor promotional tone can be addressed by |copy editing the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEBCRIT||WP:NEXIST||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: per nom. The ''best'' and most frequently cited source used here is a softball interview by Tnooz (who?) that is thin on researched facts, instead using phrases like "WAYN says...", "the company will debut...", "The business, which says...", and "WAYN proudly refers to itself as...". The other sources, as stated by the nominator, are in-passing mentions of routine funding, corporate announcements and press releases, and more softball interviews. This simply isn't encyclopedic per  guideline. I also agree with the promotionalism label, being the one who initiated the COIN discussion. Unfortunately for Wikipedia, once you take that away, there isn't enough left for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)