Deletion of 2017 Yavneh attack (2nd nomination)

Comment: to List of terrorist incidents in August 2017. I waited a few days and performed yet another  search but, as expected, no  has been established. With nothing outside the basic news cycle, this incident falls under . No  impact has been established in RS and coverage fails  as it is mainly localized and mirrored other media reports. The incident also falls short of  since the crime affected a very small area (the crime scene) and had absolutely no long-term affect on the community itself. According to , events, including crimes like these, are often reported by the media but post-analytical sources are what support notability.  reports about a future trial, even if everyone's s are working better than usual, do not contribute to notability. I urge editors to stop waiting for non-existent notability and judge the article on the limited coverage available -- as we are supposed to
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING||WP:DIVERSE||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:ROUTINE||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: Per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: even though substantially expanded, the article content still fails . For example, the "Aftermath" section contains: "Israel Defense Forces (IDF) forces raided the home of the assailant in the city of Yatta, and arrested his father." This is routine reporting. I fail to see the encyclopedic relevance here; hence my vote is still for a "Redirect" to a list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: WP:ROUTINE|Routine crime |news. If this event proves in three years or so to stand out from others, it can always be re-created, but we don't keep articles on topics that clearly fail our notability guidelines |just in case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The indictment came down today and lots more information is now coming out about the attack, furthering the  argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)

Comment: as per  ."Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance."  Simply being related to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict isn't enough to give this "additional enduring significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Obviously the attack received international coverage and it is crystallballing to say that it won't further have coverage in future future (these cases do come around especially at sentencing time).  Nominate again in a couple of years, we'll see what the record says then.  Now, on the issue that "there were no deaths."  If this was somehow any sort of standard, then you would have to delete the "Cecil the Lion" article, as: (1) There were no human deaths (2) The courts ruled everyone was innocent: the U.S. hunter, the Zimbabwean hunt guide, etc.  I.e, there was never a case at all, only media and mass hysteria.  The bottom line is that the current standard is that notability is documented via  from media and authors and as the Yavne attack has plenty of  from media, people don't have a foot to stand on to argue for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: u|Galatz}} and {{u|Shrike}} and isn't it also wrong to speculate that there will be future sources? We do not wait for subjects to be notable: they either are or are not. Besides, there is nothing  about this; coverage died after two days and the article can easily be recreated from the editing history in the unlikely event it deserves a standalone article.  coverage of a trial -- if there is coverage that is -- will not change that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: to List of terrorist incidents in August 2017.  Thankfully no deaths but also no significant international coverage, as opposed to 2016 Hurghada attack where I voted keep https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2016_Hurghada_attack. BTW - the ABC.com link just goes to their main page.  Other international web sites just reposted the AP report. http://www.sfchronicle.com/news/crime/article/Israel-police-say-Palestinian-stabs-severely-11726717.php. If more extensive independent international (i.e. non-AP) coverage develops and this attack takes on greater cultural or societal significance for any reason, then this can always be easily restored as long as it's not deleted.  applies. And it appears the most important content has already been merged to that article anyway
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)