Deletion of Firefly (mobile phone)

Comment: The topic passes , having received significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: http://www.mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=1431, http://reviews.cnet.com/cell-phones/firefly/4505-6454_7-31337423.html, http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/258301/firefly-mobile-aimed-at-toddlers, http://www.mobiledia.com/phones/fireflymobile/firefly.html, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/mobile-phones/5611280/Firefly-mobile-phone-designed-for-four-year-olds.html, http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/16/cellphones-generationone-kajeet-technology-wireless-firefly.html, http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1774057,00.asp. Something tells me the nominator forgot about , because there are clearly enough good sources here for  to be comfortably met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)