Deletion of Murder of Janie Perrin

Comment: Even if it marginally passes |GNG on its face, read in line with  it's difficult to see how this achieves the required level of notability for its own article. And the lack of significant coverage outside of news on the initial murder and a blip of coverage about an increased award means it still probably fails  regardless (see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: Creator) It looks to me as if the nom has misunderstood . If you read  you see it prohibits original reporting, such as "first-hand news reports on breaking stories" and "routine...news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities". Perrin was murdered in 1990 and the case has continued to attract significant, in-depth coverage in reliable sources many years later. For example, in February 2010 http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/cold-case-hunt-for-janies-sex-killer-20100219-ol8j.html an article was published in ''The Sydney Morning Herald'' about the continued investigation. Earlier, in 2007, the case was covered by the ABC. Other coverage pre-dating the internet is likely to be available in newspaper archives. The fact http://www.police.nsw.gov.au/can_you_help_us/rewards/100000_reward/20061101_reward_to_solve_bourke_murder a significant monetary reward has been offered for information helping to solve the murder by the NSW Police suggests this is not a "routine" event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: nn crime & does not meet  and ; no lasting signicance or societal impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: I think it is usually a bad idea to create crime articles before a suspect has been apprehended, in most cases what establishes notability for these articles will involve the legal proceedings (unless the victim is a public figure, etc.) There is no way to know whether the case will satisfy notability at some time in the future, but with what is available now I agree that it falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)