Deletion of Eileen Crimmins

Comment: Since the fixup was done on 15 May I believe the article is now worth keeping. In general I share the view of DGG that full professors are notable, though I would not have gone along with 'keep' if there were no significant publications that could be shown and discussed. Now that the defect has been remedied, I'm OK with keeping the article. I, too, was surprised to learn that anyone besides the author http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion&diff=126173178&oldid=125488973 can now remove a speedy tag per . (I seem to recall a template that used to forbid that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Her ISI WoS h-index=17, but there is no article here, this does not even rise to the level of posting a CV on Wikipedia.  "Wikipedia is not the white pages."  It's only been tagged since "May 2007" so it doesn't seem appropriate to delete, but I think if an article explaining notable achievements does not appear here in 6 months to replace this stub, then it ought to be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)