Deletion of HotPads.com

Comment: per the significant coverage in multiple |reliable sources. HotPads.com receives a http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/05/AR2006030500786.html feature in the ''Washington Post'' by Andrea Caumont. The nontrivial coverage in http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/2008-08-28-real-estate-websites_N.htm this article from ''USA Today'' goes beyond a directory listing in that HotPads.com receives scholarly analysis: Pros: This is where to begin if you're starting from a premise as broad as "rent or buy." In addition to a search that shows sale and rental properties together by monthly payment, it has a "rent ratio heat map." This shows the areas that are better to buy in, vs. those where it's more practical to rent, according to the price-to-rent ratios (an affordability calculation arrived at by dividing the price to buy a house by the annual cost of renting a similar house). There's also a map of homes in foreclosure and listings for those properties.Cons: Some rogue listings mistakenly appear in the wrong place — for example, a listing on a Washington, D.C., map was actually for a property in Oak Harbor, Wash.; a rental in Upper Manhattan was actually for a property in West New York, N.J.  These two sourcs are enough to establish notability. However, there are more references, all of which are already present in the Wikipedia article. See http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2007/04/02/story5.html this article from ''Washington Business Journal'' (titled "HotPads gets new digs, plus a cool $2M in funding") and http://www.techjournalsouth.com/2007/04/dc%E2%80%99s-hotpads-pockets-2-3-million-a-round/ this article from ''TechJournal South''. Significant coverage in four independent reliable sources, two of which are from indubitably major publications, substantiates the fact that notability per Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (web) is fully established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)