Deletion of Jews and Communism

Comment: After reading and considering the numerous comments on this page, I no longer believe any page is appropriate at all. The article violates  and . Unfortunately it seems that a source of most of the comments on this page in favour of keeping it is coming from someone with a direct  as the article's author. Among the many excellent points on why this article badly needs to be deleted, I'm convinced that the logic behind keeping this article would be just as strong for writing other pernicious articles like Hispanics and crime and Muslims and sexual abuse and so on (and I certainly do not think there is any valid reason for an article like that, even if there can be sources that incidentally discuss the existence of such a phenomenon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY||WP:OR||WP:COI)

Comment: Emphatically strong", even. This article is '''''not''''' a  from Jewish Bolshevism, since that article, by consensus, concerns itself ''exclusively'' with the Nazi conspiracy theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jewish_Bolshevism/Archive_4#RfC:_Is_Jewish_Bolshevism_a_conspiracy_theory.3F. In fact, the information presented here was removed from that article on precisely those grounds, as promoted by TFD. Creating a new article was a suggested course of action on the talkpage. Now, TFD wishes to delete this article - because his apparent goal is simply to suppress this data from Wikipedia, no matter how convoluted the reasoning. He means to do it through distastefully implying some kind of anti-semitic bias. Constant accusations, implied or otherwise, regarding anti-semitism, Nazism, and the like - are a discernible pattern at this point with the user. PRODUCER is the fourth respectable Wikipedian I've seen against whom TFD has used such means to have his way on articles. If I were accused here of supporting an antisemitic Nazi conspiracy theory, TFD would already be explaining his reasoning on the relevant admin noticeboard
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: While the topic suggested by the title would make for a perfectly valid Wikipedia article, the text as it stand now is just an |original synthesis of cherry-picked facts of the type often found on antisemitic websites. Unless there's a major rewrite (basically a new article is created under the same title), this article has no place in encyclopaedia that seeks to be neutral
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Very well sourced, very well structured, article about a subject that can stand on its own. I don't see any issue here; it's not a fork, the Jewish Bolshevism article was not the suitable place for that content since it deals itself exclusively with the conspiracy (Talk:Jewish_Bolshevism/Archive_4#RfC: Is Jewish Bolshevism a conspiracy theory?|per this RFC which was initiated by the nominator of this AfD; Do I smell an 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: This article is about Jews and Communism. There is no mention of Jewish world domination via communism, at most it is said a "disproportionately important role" (historian Norman Cantor) was played by Jews in the movement. The allegation that this article attempts to "prove" the "conspiracy theory that Communism was a Jewish movement for world domination" is thus utter nonsense. The assertion that it's "better to scrap this article and start again" is poorly cloaked 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: It seems to be well-sourced and meaningful.  Saying it's anti-semetic seems misplaced.  I suppose it depends on how you feel about communism.  Some cultures disproportionately contribute to certatin movements.  Whether they should be blamed or credited is in th eye of the beholder.  The criticisms smack of false accusations of anti-semetism, serving as a thin varnish on . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: It's interesting how little mention there is of Soviet anti-semitism. It's interesting that the article doesn't mention the Doctor's Plot, probably the most famous incident in the Jewish-Soviet relationship. There's no mention of Natan Sharansky and the Refusenik movement. There's no mention of famous Jews who became disillusioned with communism, for instance Emma Goldman or Arthur Koestler. Many prominent revolutionaries were Jews, but where's the context? Orlando Figes writes in A People's Tragedy, his history of the Russian Revolution: "Although, of course, it must never be forgotten that while many revolutionaries were Jews, relatively few Jews were revolutionaries. It was a myth of the anti-Semites that all the Jews were Bolsheviks. In fact, as far as one can tell from the elections to the Constituent Assembly in 1917, most of the Jewish population favoured the Zionist and democratic socialist parties. (pg. 82)" There's a complicated history here but this article is basically just a laundry list of who was Jewish. As others have pointed out, the implications are troubling. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not censored. This article is well-sourced and the sources support its content. This is a typical case of  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: This article is clearly not a |"point of view fork" of Jewish Bolshevism. Jewish Bolshevism article is about supposed conspiracy theory only, which is different topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: The topic is clearly notable; see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TffrTUyCD6QC&pg=PA113 The Cambridge Dictionary of Judaism and Jewish Culture'', for a piece by Marci Shore which is quite encyclopaedic in tone and so sets a good example.  The rest is then a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion, per our |editing policy.  And one needs to consider other articles besides Jewish Bolshevism, which seems rather narrow in scope.  The article Jewish left seems more relevant in setting the general context for this topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)