Deletion of Adrianne Ahern (3rd nomination)

Comment: Found only two reliable sources: http://www.kpbs.org/news/2009/jul/22/snap-out-it-now-dr-adrianne-ahern/ 90-minute PBS show and http://www.sfexaminer.com/3-minute-interview/2007/08/3-minute-interview-dr-adrianne-ahern SF Examiner interview. The PBS show is significant as not many people get their own show "aired on PBS stations nationwide"http://www.delmartimes.net/2010/01/14/dr-adrianne-ahern-works-to-help-others-reach-goals/. But there's a notable absence of in-depth independent sources, which is the requirement per . Am I missing something
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The blocked user who created it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sentientpublications is the same person who built it up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Connieshaw and who admitted on her talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Connieshaw#At_it_again.2C_are_you.3F to being the owner of the publishing house that puts these books out.  The publisher has littered Wikipedia with very poorly written articles designed to promote the non-notable writers she publishes.  So much for background.  On the merits:  I agree with much of what DGG has said.  A hopeless case of .  Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK)