Deletion of Dogecoin

Comment: does not meet , no reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've semi-protected this page due to the flood of single purpose accounts and IPs recruited from other sites. While I have no evidence to support the idea of sockpuppetry, this does seem to be a violation of our |meatpuppetry guideline. Note that arguments not grounded in Wikipedia policy will be discarded by the closing administrator. See Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Personal_point_of_view|here for more details
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT)

Comment: No |GNG. Such memes. Wow
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are sufficient sources that help it meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)

Comment: Deletion requests are , the fact that the underlying meme is hated by so many people is not a reason to delete a page about a specific currency, currencies are otable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:N)

Comment: Coverage of this coin has been limited to blogs and sites of limited reputability so far, this article might not pass . This content might be better merged to Doge_(meme), since it looks identical to existing coins besides the "Doge" branding. As an aside, I'm confused by the COI accusations of the nominator. The screenshot of his forum comment is hardly damning: in it, he talks about his deletion request getting overrun by meatpuppets. How is that evidence of trolling? I don't see what anyone stands to gain from this article getting deleted, but based on the meatpuppetry going on here I'd say the accusers might be Psychological_projection|projecting, especially if they have a monetary stake in Dogecoin
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As per , only sources provided have been blogs that are not reliable sources. Not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wow. Such sources. Much notability. Very |snowball (what's next? Is Doge itself going to get a page? Oh... Doge (meme)|god dang it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: or '''Very merge''' to Cryptocurrency: Much '''Keep''' arguments are based upon the assumption of a future success; now, as this coin is not even a month old, such an assumption seems to be somewhat farfetched. There is also a clear lack of secondary sources that could provide some understanding of the subject beyond the obvious buzz and excitement: the launch of this "would-be currency" fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)