Deletion of NickCentral (company)

Comment: per #A7 and {{u|RoySmith}}'s comments, with which I completely agree. That the website is not accessible to anyone who isn't an employee of Viacom or one of its external partners makes the possibility of paid editing strong. Note that AlbForLife4 posted to this AfD's talk page but I'm not convinced by his reasons for not supplying references. Regarding the nom's comment that {{tq|The disambiguator also appears to be wrong (it's a website, not a company)}}, I agree it's a minor issue but I should point out that the article was originally at NickCentral (website) and was moved to {{noredirect|Draft:NickCentral (website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Probably qualifies for .  Had {{U|AlbForLife4}} simply moved this into mainspace, I would suggest treating it as a novice mis-step and just moving it back to draft.  But, the history of this shows a combative tendency, and possibly a sock.  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NickCentral_(company)&diff=912722991&oldid=912717300&diffmode=source This edit comment ("we have improved the page...") makes me believe they're working as part of a promotional team, or at best, / so I'm not really inclined to cut them any slack
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7||WP:COI||WP:UPE)