Deletion of List of most-played video games by peak concurrent users

Comment: Is this a topic that {{tq|has been discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources}} per , or are we merely compiling information from various on-independent sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:N)

Comment: as , broadly speaking, -- this is a narrow intersection of arbitrary criteria. This is one of those "fun to have" listicles, but it's not encyclopedic. I rarely say , but it's really not Wikipedia's place to gather this kind of stat tables. A brief mention of top games in some article is sufficient. Plus, I agree with previous noms' sentiment of this being inherently unverifiable and the sources only estimate and speculate when not given primary data by devs/publishers themselves. As per nom -- the only reason publishers share this info is when they want to stand out. You could hardly find this data for smaller games. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IAR)

Comment: this is a topic that passes both  and , and unlike the other lists this one can actually be maintained since it does not have to be constantly updated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:SALAT)

Comment: As a arbitrary list perhaps with a non-standard selection criteria, it fails . It not really encyclopedic. If it was expanded out with much more depth, it could be notable in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)