Deletion of Alex Gilbert (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and , tried real hard to find rational to keep this, but this BLP article is sourced entirely on non-reliable sources on top of failing the above argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:ENT)

Comment: Gilbert is a non-notable cinematographer.  After cutting out all the notability-irrelevant sources we are left with a New Zealand TV documentary and subsequent New Zealand newspaper coverage of his meeting with his birth mother in Russia.  Frankly, TV makes these kind of documentaries all the time with fly-on-the-wall following of adopted children, homeless people, drug addicts, victims of scams, families on benefit etc etc etc.  To my mind this kind of thing falls under .  The subjects of this kind of coverage have no ongoing notabiity.  The only difference in this case is that the subject has written a book and has some aptitude for self-publicity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per nom,  and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: All three criteria for  seem to be met, which suggests "we should generally avoid having an article" on such a subject. The claim of notability is based on Gilbert being the subject of a TV news piece and an article about his finding his birth parents. The amount and duration of coverage were limited, and fall short of establishing Gilbert as an ongoing notable individual. Another point brought up is he wrote an autobiography, but this was self-published, and while it may be interesting it is not indicative of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)