Deletion of Dazi Bridge

Comment: I can't find any evidence that it meets . Few secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Nominator's rationale is invalid, as there is already enough identifying information (even coordinates) present in the article. The |notability guideline for bridges and other infrastructure is not clear, so I will defer to the judgment of others in deciding between redirecting or a full keep. ''GotR
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?id=s0001892 is usable for the specifications/statistics of the bridge, and also directly makes a mention of a book with some information on this bridge - there are passing mentions in that book. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=XxYKgLVnT8YC&pg=SA63-PA32&lpg=SA63-PA32&dq=Dazi+Bridge&source=bl&ots=GEPeLJ9B3i&sig=8oXbcE6sH9cPlx145QeR6UMkkZs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pMzuUKT7EozL0AWDiYC4BQ&ved=0CFYQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q=Dazi%20Bridge&f=false There will also be information here: http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Articles_on_Transport_in_Tibet_Including.html?id=vVz-ygAACAAJ&safe=vss&redir_esc=y, and there is mention of it here: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DnQOzYDJsm8C&dq=Dazi+Bridge&source=gbs_navlinks_s. There are almost certainly countless Chinese, Nepalese or Tibetan sources on this as well - someone with more access to these books and those foreign sources will be able to expand this article quite dramatically. I question whether either the nominator, or the delete voters, have either read  or truly looked for sources - all I did was search Dazi Bridge on Google and found these, without any specialist knowledge
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)