Deletion of Kent Glowinski (2nd nomination)

Comment: Agree on . Forgot to quote. Out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Narcissistic Personality Disorder"? Sounds like a scientific/medical work. No, it's an apparently self-published book of 'poems'. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=98FnIP2TEi8C&dq=%22Narcissistic+Personality+Disorder%22+Glowinski%27&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=C2eqS-LMD4W80gTK8-HHAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=&f=false (I hate those Google links...) Subject of article seems to have been a rather thrusting teenager, but not to have achieved much as a result. The McGill Daily is a student newspaper, and I don't feel that contributing there is particularly notable. 'His latest article "Don’t get enough credit? The need for an impartial consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario" is in the process of being published.' OK. Where and in what, and remember 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: We created this page on the subject years back when circumstances would have rendered him notable within meaning of ; however, those circumstances changed and subject remains relatively unknown PF. Keep in mind "profile" is dynamic . As for above comments about civil lawsuits: if Wikipedia is to retain articles on relatively unknown subjects solely because unproven allegations in civil lawsuits appear in the media through malice/pure interest or otherwise, almost anyone in a litigation (divorces, property disputes, etc.), which often become heated, would become notable and deserving of a page. Wikipedia is not here to parrot out relatively tenuous and unlinked data appearing in media here and there and pertaining to unknown individuals. If the criteria for being notable is (1) civic involvement at any point in life and (2) being involved in one or more legal disputes at any point in life, then 90% of the population is famous. There also seems to be a zeal to keep articles solely in spite of someone who wants them removed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NPF||WP:LOWPROFILE)