Deletion of Lady Gaga as gay icon

Comment: edit conflict) This may well become an encyclopedic subject in a decade or two, but really it's premature. The fact that we have other articles about gay icons is indicative of how those performers have cemented their status in gay culture over a lifetime. Lady Gaga hasn't made that much of an impact yet and the quality of sources show that. Compare those here to those in Judy Garland as gay icon. Another concern is . If sources haven't made these connections between, say, Gaga's mother liking fashion and her being a gay icon, does this count as |sythesis? The article is relatively well-written and interesting, but I don't think it has a place here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: or merge, if appropriate. I see no |reliable sources that actually prove the |notability ''of the article subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Feel this is too . The woman hasn't even had her career expand for a year and hence any legacy as a gay icon always comes of as too much of fancrufty and recentism. Madonna and Janet's career and their legacy and work in the LGBT areas are set in stone. Hence their articles appear as solid exapmples of how they have influenced the community. In this case, comes off as vapid
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)