Deletion of List of e-mail spammers

Comment: but clean up.  In particular get rid of some of the charged wording (I've already removed "notorious") and tag each entry with a  such as a http://www.spamhaus.org ROKSO listing or a wire service story.  A list of "known or alleged" spammers -- properly documented as to the facts or allegations -- doesn't violate 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:LIBEL)

Comment: considering that Spamhaus is currently being sued in part for mentioning someone on their ROKSO list, I'm not sure that they alone qualify as a reliable source.  In particular, the parts of  that mention "bias", "confidentiality" (SpamHaus doesn't release all evidence to the public that the collect to protect themselves in a court case), and "Recognition by other reliable sources" (in particular, courts have not recognized them).  To be clear, I *personally* feel that Spamhaus is a highly reliable source, but for purposes of Wikipedia defending itself in a legal sense, we need to be very conservative here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)