Deletion of Loius Carlet (2nd nomination)

Comment: I haven't participated in previous discussions, which there have been two, and I am open to the suggestion that process is being abused in this situation.  However, while I hope one day Mr Carlet becomes notable and more power to him and the union, however, sources 2, 3 are self written and 5 is nothing more than an advertisment for the union's march, source 4 has nothing to say about Mr. Carlet.  Like I said, nothing against the union and Mr. Carlet and I am sure he can be an excellent source as for reports, but I can't see why he is notable under  at this time in his career.  Sorry, Mr. Carlet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Obviously a notable person, passes  and . Everything in the article is sourced, doesn't seem promotional to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)