Deletion of Historic Environment

Comment: to Australia ICOMOS. I could not find multiple reliable sources for this journal/magazine. RMIT's Australian Heritage Bibliography indexing point towards notability. I think we need to be careful of systemic bias here; it is possible that the magazine  is notable as  "a significant publication in a non-trivial niche market, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Magazines#Notability item number 5. For this reason, '''Keep''' is OK by me as well. But I don't know enough about this magazine to be able to confidently assert a keep. What I do know is that the magazine is easily verifiable. Per , we should try to preserve verifiable information rather than delete it. This magazine is produced by Australia ICOMOS and already has a short paragraph there; it seems the best target. The title is somewhat generic, but as the proper title of the magazine, I think a redirect is warannted
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)