Deletion of Shehzad Poonawalla

Comment: looks promtional to me, and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Coverage found in notable news outlets, hence meets . E.g. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/absolutely-false-says-shehzad-poonawalla-after-congress-denies-links-with-cambridge-analytica/articleshow/63399805.cms  https://www.indiatoday.in/india/delhi/story/shehzad-poonawalla-releases-cambridge-analytica-s-pitch-to-congress-party-1213804-2018-04-17  https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/who-is-shehzad-poonawalla-the-man-who-challenged-rahul-gandhis-candidature-for-congress-presidential-polls/953794/  https://www.news18.com/news/politics/family-ties-in-rival-parties-do-not-always-end-the-poonawalla-way-1596119.html  https://www.firstpost.com/politics/shehzad-poonawalla-hits-back-at-congress-says-he-became-whistle-blower-to-reveal-rigged-party-president-election-4240253.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there's certainly a ton of coverage on him from Indian newspapers, mostly for his challenging of his political party's nomination of a relative of Gandhi. He also appears on television, and a search brings up article after article with his name in it. I don't have any problems with blanking the article as it stands as there are a ton of problems with it. I also have no idea how to gauge notability in this instance due to general unfamiliarity with Indian politics. I think it's closer than the delete votes have given it credit for, but I am also unwilling to argue for it as a keep under  and due to the number of problems with the article as pointed out above, especially by DGG
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: my vote above stands. If the article is promotional, then 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)