Deletion of Maria Belen Shapur

Comment: per .  Merge any relevant info into Mark Sanford
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: to Mark Sanford disappearance and extramarital affair, per . —&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Maybe we can find some information about her previous unremarkable career, since we want to include lurid details of the one event?" See the essay  for reasons this should not be our approach to a biography. Also, per , do not use attacks on the U.S.A. as a tactic in deletion debates
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:AGF)

Comment: I agree it is pretty much a -- but, organizationally, I find it much better when you split-out the personal-stuff into a separate article (as has been done here).  Lets  and keep-- with the name
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT||WP:IAR)

Comment: per .  As a former fairly low-profile reporter, or as a divorced mother, she never would have had an article survive AFD. Sleeping with a Governor does not make someone |notable by Wikipedia's standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO)

Comment: to Mark Sanford disappearance and extramarital affair. This is a classic example of , and we shouldn't have articles on people when, as in this case, they say hardly anything more than the article about the event does. I'm not convinced that Maria Belen Shapur is notable as a reporter separately from this event; therefore, this should be a redirect. That way, the article can always be recreated if independent notability can subsequently be demonstrated. Can't seem to find the tilde button on this computer... Hopefully Sinebot will sign this post
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Falls foul of .  If every mistress had a page, we would not be able to see the wood from the trees
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Monica Lewinsky , comes closer to  than Ms. Chapur. Lewinsky, after all, has ''no'' notability that's not directly derived from her affair with Bill Clinton. Yet no serious user would suggest deleting her article. Chapur, on the other hand, was a reporter in Argentina long before the affair even started, let alone became known to the public. The only reason she didn't already have an article is regional bias toward the United State. Which is in no way a policy, it's just an result of most users of the English version of Wikipedia being from the US. Also,  specifically says "If the event is significant, and/or if the individual's role within it is substantial, a separate article for the person may be appropriate." Both of those exceptions to BLP1E clearly apply here. The affair has most likely ended the political career of a man who was, just a week and a half ago, one of the rising stars of the Republican Party and a likely Presidential candidate, and as the woman he was having the affair with she's obviously central to the event. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Some care must be made to respect this lady's privacy, and  must be followed at all times, but as a central figure in something plastering the news in the US right now, she is a very notable person.  We have enough -worthy material describing her and her life which goes beyond just the current media attention on her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:RS)

Comment: This is a classic . She is notable for one thing and one thing only, something which happens to not be particularly flattering in most cultures. Unless her notability changes for some reason, there is no way we should have an article about this woman just to say that she had an affair with a well known politician&mdash;that goes to the core of our BLP policy. If there's a strong consensus to delete I think a speedy deletion is completely appropriate - we don't need to let this sit around for a week if it's an obvious delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Dating a notable person isn't even 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to Mark Sanford disappearance and extramarital affair, per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: A clear , about as clear as you can get
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)