Deletion of Tauseef Bukhari

Comment: There is no significant coverage so fails . This trumps the trivial (and debatable) pass of , by virtue of playing a single preliminary round match in which he contributed very little. This would also indicate that it is extremely unlikely there is any coverage to be found, and if there were any it would be for his later career as a coach/administrator. '''Redirect''' would be an accepted ATD, but it seems that this later career far exceeds that as a player, so redirecting to List of Bahawalpur cricketers seems undue and Hong Kong national under-19 cricket team does not exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCRIC)

Comment: according to , he qualifies for notability, having umpired at the International level. So, Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRICKET)

Comment: While the coverage isn't just to the main cricket statistical databases, the two other sources either fail  (a list of umpired matches) or are PRIMARY (his coaching career.) The SNG pass is also exceptionally marginal - 1 List-A game, which aren't generally well-covered by media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: there are a few different sources cited in the article, along with the (marginal) pass of , providing enough room to consider that further work may lead to  being met. I note that there is no reference at all by the nominator in the AfD of having done even trivial  searches, let alone the searches in non-Anglophone sources which would be required for this subject (likely in both Urdu and Cantonese) in line with the approach at . No evidence to support the assertion that that subject is "non-notable". I might change my view on this one if I felt that there the appropriate  checks had been conducted and were referenced in the AfD to provide verifiability, but that's simply not the case here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATHLETE||WP:BEFORE)