Deletion of Why I Am Not a Christian

Comment: and move this deletion nomination to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Silly Things (WP:BJAODN)

Comment: References could probably be found (I don't really have the time to check myself at the moment), and it could be arguably notable as the author is apparently notable himself. However, it is a borderline , and could perhaps provide a bit more background and a bit less quoted material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: references are available, at least two are cited already, therefore it passes . The very fact that it was written by a highly notable philosopher ought to be enough to make it notable in its own right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This is what http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/books/review/Holt.t.html?ex=1188360000&en=3798461d78ae3d18&ei=5070 The New York Times calls a "classic 1927 essay". As stated above, it definitely passes  because "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable, even in the absence of secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)