Deletion of Guo Dongli

Comment: per . Nothing in the article seems to indicate the importance of this person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7)

Comment: the topic of this article may need more Wikipedia's |notability guideline for biographies. However, Wikipedia is a work in progress. Also, to define an article is an "hoay" need evidence, not with guess and suspicion.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/108.83.17.57|108.83.17.57
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: article makes no claim of notability. Why does this person matter? Generally we assume that the question is answered by independent reliable sources when they (not just one or two) chose to do in-depth reporting on the subject, but a little common sense applies, too. Anyway, this doesn't pass  cuz it doesn't have that level of reporting. If there was an interview with VOA, then perhaps it should be published by VOA, wouldn't that be logical. It seems especially suspicious that the anonymous VOA reporter with whom the subject is suposedly doing an interview in one of the cited refs is unable to use correct English. I'm with above commenters, this appears to be little more than a detailed hoax of some sort.  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:A7)

Comment: This article is meet the  and  since it has a big improve and more notable addition references to compare with the initial one. There has a selection of articles relate to Guo Dongli (references/significant independent coverage).  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/204.102.74.3|204.102.74.3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)