Deletion of Andrew G. Geishecker

Comment: Nothing in the article or sources indicates he was anything more than a |run-of-the-mill trial-court-level state judge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: Just because the Massachusetts District Court is a statewide ''body'' does not mean every individual judge on it gets an automatic free pass over our notability criteria for judges; it is the basic trial court, not a higher-level appeals or supreme court, and is divided into several distinct regions rather than one statewide jurisdictional area. So the notability test he has to pass is not simply that he's verifiable as having existed — it's that he can be shown to pass  on a sufficient depth and range and volume of coverage ''about him''. But that's not what these references are showing: the only one that's about him to any non-trivial degree is the merely expected obituary, while the remainder of the sources are (a) a comprehensive list of every judge on the court, which namechecks them all without being ''about'' any of them, (b) a brief and unsubstantive blurb, and (c) strictly genealogical paid-inclusion death and marriage notices for his non-notable relatives. This is not how you make a judge notable enough for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While I suppose that there was something notable in his career, which antedates the internet, we don't have any evidence yet.  I am assuming he was a trial judge in the court of general jurisdictio the lowest trial court Massachusetts District Court in Massachusetts.  Does not meet , which applies I think.  Longevity in the position doesn't butter any parsnips, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)