Deletion of Finola Hackett (2nd nomination)

Comment: Jesus f***ing Christ, do we have to go through this again? Thank heavens most of the people above me realize the notability of this person. First, as Clamster notes, this is almost certainly a bad faith nom. Second, she easily passes  not just for the multiple articles from reliable sources that focus (sometimes exclusively) on her, but because she won a well-known national championship twice and came in second in the most well-regarded event of its type in the world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per the arguments Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finola Hackett|first AFD (please link these when renominating). It received a lot of "strong keep" votes there! 2nd place in a contest of this importance is notable. Passes ; she has competed at the "highest level" in the Scripps National, itself a "competitive activity that is itself considered notable". (Also she won another smaller national Spelling Bee!) On top of that, the article has multiple non-trivial sources specifically about her, so what is the problem? &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: references demonstrate coverage in third-party independent sources per , but more than two sources (from one local newspaper) are ideally needed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)