Deletion of Heimdal™ Security

Comment: I can't see the previous instance which was rejected at AfC and then deleted, but the comments left by reviewer {{u|Rich Smith}} on the article creator's Talkpage https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AUnterfigher_Vladimir&type=revision&diff=970320666&oldid=970320535 look equally applicable to this newly-created instance. The article text does no more than describe the staffing and commercial history of a company going about its business, with no claim to encyclopaedic notability, and supported by references which fall under ''trivial coverage'' at . Searches find more routine coverage of opening of offices, etc., but also past coverage of a problem in their software (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47671346 BBC News: "Security flaw put RBS customers at risk of cyber-attack"). Were the article to survive, information about that incident should be added to the text and references. However I don't see that as |evidence of attained |notability for the firm. Nor is there an article on the acquiring firm Marlin Equity Partners which could serve as a merge/redirect target
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:RS||:WP:NCORP)