Deletion of Fan Doctor

Comment: Based on comments at the talk page, this may be a school assignment of some sort. In addition, it's rather interesting, and sort of sweet: I could imagine a profile of this gentleman showing up in the pages of a magazine like ''National Geographic'', and in any event this material ought to have a home somewhere on the web.  However, that's not the test for whether an article belongs in Wikipedia.  We don't keep |original research; we need to see |independent reliable sources that show that the subject is |notable in Wikipedia terms, for example, to show that his "fan hospital" is recognized as a sort of popular culture landmark in Hong Kong. The source at footnote 6 (Google translation http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=zh-CN&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fstu.hksyu.edu%2F~ourvoice%2Frelease2005%2F200503%2Frelease200503_04c.htm here) might qualify, marginally.  So might this one http://www.popular-papers.com/news-1407664_3.html depending on the provenance of the website.  I tried searching the string  but that seems to be almost impossible to get useful results.  was not much more fruitful.  Will wait to see if more can be identified by Chinese speakers; otherwise, interesting as this is, it seems destined for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:N)