Deletion of Greg Terhune

Comment: per nom.  Contract with Columbus Crew is listed as a "temporary contract" and he never played a game, thus he fails .  Most of the refs in the article are primary and non-primary doesn't go into any "significant details", thus he fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject does not satisfy specific notability guideline (SNG) of , and is therefore not entitled to presumption of notability.  Article author and chief defender does not understand the requirements of the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG, specifically including the meaning of multiple "independent, reliable sources."  Comments above by Bjelleklang are right on the money
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Gregoryat has not yet provided any evidence that Greg Terhune ever actually played a game in the Major League Soccer|MLS.  Signing a contract with a team is not the same as playing for the team.  Neither is playing for a development organization (whether it requires a contract or not) the same as playing for the team.   requires that a player have played for a |fully professional league, which, for the United States in the time frame of interested, is limited to MLS (and not its development leagues).  Since notability cannot be ''assumed'' based on ,  becomes the defining policy, and this subject fails  by lack of '''significant''' coverage in multiple, independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: fails  and . Only editor !voting to keep is the subject himself, says it all really
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Can this be closed per  or should we wait a week to make it official
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: The author claims this passes  and  but I disagree. Of the 8 sources, two, possible three does not appear to be independent of the subject. Nos 1 and 3 are identical with what appears to be a press release fromhttp://www.herdzone.com/sports/m-soccer/spec-rel/051807aaa.html, which isn't independent and thus doesn't count for notability purposes. No 2 appear to be about the same event, and a short notice about someone signing up with a new club doesn't establish notability, only that he signed up. 4, 5, 7, possibly also no. 6 aren't independent of the subject (former clubs), while number 8 is a bio from a charity he is active with as a coach. Therefore, he does not pass  has he claims, and as far as I can tell. As for ; the criteria is either to have played/coached/managed in an international match, or to have played for/coached/managed in a fully professional league. As far as I can tell from the sources and the article in question, he has done neither. The guideline also states that ''"A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable."'' So as far as I can tell, he simply isn't notable, or at least haven't provided the sources needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)