Deletion of Cognitive and linguistic theories of composition

Comment: The rationale given for deletion is curious. Physical theory does not have its own article (it is a redirect to Theoretical physics). Does it now follow that Physical theories modified by general relativity is entirely meaningless? That is a ''non sequitur (logic)|non sequitur'', and likewise for the nominator's conclusion that the nominated article is meaningless. But even if the conclusion was valid, the article is not patent nonsense – far from it. Being orphaned or from the stone age are also not valid deletion rationales. Appeals to  are even an implicit argument for keeping the article. In short, the nomination fails to present a valid argument for deletion, which is a reason for a speedy keep. &nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)