Deletion of Wraith Squadron

Comment: or '''Redirect to Star Wars: X-wing (book series)''' - This is and cannot become any more than a #PLOT|large scale plot repetition of the novel series in question. Consequently, it is much better served at most as a redirect towards Star Wars: X-wing (book series). Reiterating the plot of those novels in an |in-universe style here with no |verifiable |real-world information is not in the least bit necessary. I'd like to see the image retained though, I'm sure a place can be found somewhere at Star Wars: X-wing (book series
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:WAF||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: So significant coverage of the subject itself (apart from mentions of the subject incident to characters or other things).  As best I can tell (I don't own the 'making of' book, but I own the other one), the sources refer less to the squadron than to the characters in it (mentionins of the squadron appear to be trivial)  Neither a significant element ''of'' the star wars universe nor significant outside the start wars universe.  This article consists almost entirely of content that violates  and looks like  (lots of speculation from the point of view of the editor).  The subject itself fails  and no enacted daughter guideline covers the subject.  As for the claim that "titular elements" of fiction are notable, I don't see that in the enacted  or the proposed .  Delete this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:FICTION)

Comment: none of the sources are independent of the topic. "Making of..." media is good for sourcing, but doesn't constitute notability, as it is not independent from the publisher. As it stands, |asserts no notability and #PLOT|contains excessive plot details. No prejudice against a redirect to the relevant article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOT)