Deletion of Eulita Music Group

Comment: The above mentioned reason for deletion is in correct, as there are sufficient Sources to support  and . The only reason above given for deletion is "the claim to fame is the hired producer" ( Such words from the requesting party for deletion are in direct conflict with wikipedia as stated "it is better to say "does not meet WP:BIO" to avoid insulting the subject"),with no regard to the very famous Susie Field of the Field family that founded Interescope Records. The Largest selling Record label to date. Another example is the labels association with Sullen Clothing which has received press around the world and is currently one of the largest alternative life style clothing companies in the world. To add to the argument if the company was not note worthy they would have never been featured world wide by iTunes which is very prestiges as no money can buy such placement with iTunes. Not including the artist that have been release by said label, it may be justified that, not enough research was done by the requesting party for deletion on the subject. This is an example of a Independent Record label that has a similar page with less sources and back round http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flicker_Records that has survived the wikipedia requirements, it would be a shame to see subjective and Bias calls for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: None of the references go in to any |depth about Eulita, with one not mentioning them and seemingly only there to assert notability by association. I found nothing better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)