Deletion of TRIVIA: Voices of Feminism

Comment: Since both NJOURNALS and JOURNALCRIT are essays, whether the subject meets them or not isn't particularly relevant.  I see no sign that the subject meets the GNG, however, and as a resident of the town in which this one is published (and working for an organization ''publishing'' similar periodicals), never having heard of the subject causes me to wonder.  Of the two sources in the article that aren't primary, one is a press release (and one, furthermore, nearly two decades old, and actually surfing to the source reveals that it's the webpage of one of TRIVIA's editors) and the other listing only the publication's name, that it is in the "newspapers" category, and the names of four ex-editors.Beyond that, a glance at the contribution history of the article creator https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=&limit=500&target=Penguinxs&namespace=all&tagfilter=&newOnly=1&start=&end= turns up quite a few similar articles, many on obscure, ephemeral feminist publications, lacking any notion of substantive coverage, and often with fannish |peacock language.  None of the half dozen such articles I looked at could survive AfD, I wager, and several more of the editor's article creations have been moved to draftspace for lack of sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK)

Comment: It's a magazine and not really a peer-reviewed academic journal, so NJournals does not apply. Criteria for magazines are even weaker than for journals, so GNG applies, which as Ravenswing explains eloquently, is not met in this case. The other articles mentioned should perhaps be |PRODed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD)