Deletion of Allied Wallet

Comment: WP:MILL|Another ''|global provider of ... solutions'' |advertising on Wikipedia.  When you see "global" and "solution" misused in the article, it's too early to concern yourself with notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B||WP:SPAM)

Comment: otherwise known as a definitive example on why I dislike corporate articles on Wikipedia. Fails  in that most of the sources provided are either: self published, press releases or Wikipedia. In this ironic PR example http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-sunday-telegraph-details-how-allied-wallet-helps-businesses-grow-2012-12-17 it goes to say how it's been featured in The Sunday Telegraph but doesn't actually link to the article, same for The Guardian http://www.congoo.com/news/addstorycomment.aspx?st=216023320&Channel_ID=23&Category_ID=-1 and Wired http://linux.sys-con.com/node/2475627. Searches for the articles in question have yet to show any results, save more examples of the same press release, leading me to think that this may have been done for promotional purposes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)