Deletion of The Oaktree Foundation

Comment: I agree with nominator's point that most content is not notable and poorly sourced. I also agree this is a borderline case. I think the org's greatest claim to notability can be summarized http://www.sohe.wisc.edu/is/documents/SilbereisenandLernerchapter.pdf here in one paragraph on page 250. It's apparently the first completely youth-run international aid and development organization. That's pretty neat, and there are plenty of press-release style articles, interviews with and books by its members. But 1) the org itself and its activities haven't been the subject of multiple, third-party, independent, reliable sources per ; 2) none of its activities seem notable (significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject) per  generally
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO||WP:NN)

Comment: The sources provided by Yeti Hunter show that this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)