Deletion of Top 100 meter times by NFL players

Comment: per . I haven't seen any reliable sources that talk about the subject of NFL players running the 100m dash. All the sources given in the article are reliable, but they are combined to form an article that is not notable. Maybe the article can be reformed to cover fastest 40-yard dash times of NFL players (which is probably notable). This article is an example of an editor creating a topic they think is notable, but with no reliable sources to establish its notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: no way in the world is this original research.  The editor didn't go out and personally time these runs, they were looked up from multiple third party sources and then assembled in a table.  Every one of them.  This clearly falls under  as acceptable with details at essay 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:CALC||WP:COUNTSORT)