Deletion of A Midsummer Night's Dream (Seiji Ozawa recording)

Comment: The article meets criteria 1 of  because it has been reviewed in multiple publications independent of the subject. A quick search revealed these sources: https://www.gramophone.co.uk/review/mendelssohn-a-midsummer-nights-dream-1 gramaphone and https://www.nytimes.com/1992/10/17/arts/classical-music-in-review-997792.html The New York Times. Notability is clearly evident based on these sources. Any copyvio material should be removed, but the article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)

Comment: The criteria in ikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for  concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:NPOV||WP:NALBUM)

Comment: per . The article's COPYVIO issue has been addressed - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course. Remember that Judi Dench used to be the head of MI6, and they're not people you want to get on the wrong side of
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM)

Comment: note that it also fails '''''' and ''''''. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUM||WP:COPYVIO)