Deletion of Commuter Cars

Comment: https://money.cnn.com/galleries/2009/smallbusiness/0909/gallery.innovation_nation.fsb/ CNN Money, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=8591364 Bloomberg, The subject was http://content.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1669723_1669725_1669744,00.html notable in 2005 and once a subject is notable it remains notable. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: The CNN Money article is based entirely on an interview and therefore fails . The Bloomberg reference is a basic generic listing provided by the company with no independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and/or fact checking and is not significant coverage, fails both SIGCOV and ORGIND. "Coverage" does not equate to references that may be used to establish notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: to Commuter Cars Tango. If you combine coverage of the car with coverage of the company, it nets just enough notability to justify one article. Most of our sources are interested in what makes the car unique, rather than the company, so we probably prefer to keep the car article and merge a summary of the details about the company into a section of that article, rather than the other way around. Yet another  electric vehicle permastub
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Agree with Dennis Bratland above. The vehicle is notable, and all of the coverage that goes to establishing notability is about the unique aspects of the car. None of the references for the company meet the criteria for establishing the notability of the company, topic fails GNG and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: with to Commuter Cars Tango.  I have improved the reference formatting on the latter article, but it would be improved by moving some of the "References" to in line citations.  I also improved the formatting of the reference in this article Commuter Cars. In any event, between the two articles, there is plenty to satisfy . 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEXIST)