Deletion of Elise Harris

Comment: per  and .  References #5, #6, #15 satisfy the following criteria: 1) They address the subject directly in detail, so no original research was needed to extract the content; 2) They encompass published works; 3) They are multiple secondary sources, independent of the subject;  Also per  "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or popularity".  Also please refrain from insinuating that those who voted "Maintain" after me are really myself using multiple identities.  I did not know the correct term, and evidently those who followed me just re-used the same term.  It should not be surprising that at least 3 out of her thousands of followers on YouTube and Twitter would comment here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Article lacks |attribution to |verify  or  notability criteria … notwithstanding the subject's apparent fanboy popularity, YouTube videos and IMDb links do not  make. Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{User|71.166.157.40
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:attribution||WP:verify)

Comment: per  and , and agree that the "maintain" votes above strongly suggest this is a severely misguided promotion attempt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)