Deletion of Cloverfield (creature)

Comment: because this is one entity in ''one'' film.  This article is purely |original research based on the |in-universe information.  The film article Cloverfield serves as a far better location for talking about all aspects of the film, including the creature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:PLOT)

Comment: Article now appears to be well sourced. Creature is also the main antagonist of a |notable movie
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per .  Wow, I ''never'' would've guessed I'd vote this way, but the quality has ''seriously'' improved, and it contains enough content to potential justify the split per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: Original research, crap, etc. If there are secondary sources, they should be used to establish notability first and foremost. Given that the creature itself is a derivative fictional element which wields no cultural influence, I doubt any case for establishing notability could be made now. Specifically, cruft and viral advertisements are not notable by virtue of fan interest alone (we defer to ). Maybe in a few years, after more movies, a developed media franchise, or significant published commentary there will be a solid basis for an article on the subject. ˉˉ
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as rewritten ().  Even Hasbro understands the importance, not to mention marketability, of this central character
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: clearly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as a violation of , nothing salvable to merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: this article fits all the criterion for  and the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Masem/wp-fict-proposed|proposed revision of that guideline. It also seems with the manga and inevitable movie sequel(s), information will only make this article more notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)