Deletion of Robert Slade (2nd nomination)

Comment: I think  is a better notability guideline than  in this case: despite the deletion sort listing under academics and educators, Slade's books seem aimed more at industry than academia. Regardless, it's not hard to find multiple published reviews of his works http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1480866 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=565419  http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-126449561.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-80869959.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-84879190.html. The nominator's claim that this is self-promotion appears to be false, easily seen to be false by looking at the article history, and an unfortunately common violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:AGF)

Comment: I think  The vast majority of the links on this article are from the authors own self promotion pages.   Not to mention his 'claim to fame' is writing a couple of computer security books. That's it. Amazon is full of authors who have written far more books, books that are in multiple languages, used around the world.  His biggest claim to fame is doing a lot of reviews for other books. If this article stays in, it is a sign that Wikipedia is just as biased as many people claim it is.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/173.64.206.194|173.64.206.194
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)