Deletion of 2006 Australian network television schedule

Comment: Keeping such articles about the schedule (as opposed to daily programming) is consistent with #Wikipedia is not a directory which says "..historically significant programme lists and schedules (such as the annual United States network television schedules) may be acceptable." The networks schedule should not be trivialized and misrepresented as mere "TV Guide," which says what the program's episode will be on a particular day. In a given country, the network TV schedules have typically been discussed in more depth in books, magazines, and newspaper media columns, than mere listings of the days programming. The scheduling choices, and their effects on the ratings of programs, are part of the subject matter of college courses in broadcasting and media. The schedule is a strategic choice of what program leads into a given program, and what the competition is in a time slot. They are not random
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Nomination rests on incorrect reading of ; see generally my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States network television schedules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: per  but is also |unsourced and not isn't encyclopaedic for Wikipedia. It would be best suited on a Television history Wiki then here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:UNSOURCED)

Comment: As has been stated  allows television schedules.  The real problem is the sourcing.  I believe reliable sources exist but are not properly cited in the article.  Assuming reliable sources can be found the article should stay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)