Deletion of David Letele (2nd nomination)

Comment: I think there is enough to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The original AfD was correct and mainly hinged on not meeting  - a situation that remains.  I do remember the article enough to see that there are more references and some expansion of non-boxing information but frankly neither the Rugby or having a Weight-loss regime contribute to his notability.  So the question boils down to  and that would reflect news coverage.  I want to think about this a bit more and see what others say.  I do think that the article is in a better position now then it was so the restore and bring it to second AfD makes sense.  Benny (the original editor) writes well but with a local flavor.  Not a reason to move in any direction - just saying
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOX||WP:GNG)

Comment: Most of the sources given are routine sports reporting.  However, I do think there is just enough there to squeak by on meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Thanks, Patar knight, for restoring this. I suggest that since the previous AfD discussion in October 2015, Letele has achieved |general notability. There was previously a substantial article in ''The New Zealand Herald'' (August 2015), and since then we have had an interview with ''Mens Mag NZ'' (undated, but published on their Facebook page on 17 April 2016, although they published a lot of stuff that day and I don't know whether that was about getting older content onto the FB site), ''Newshub'' reporting (6 March 2016), a 5:49 min interview with Paul Henry (broadcaster)|Paul Henry (6 May 2016), and a fairly long article in the ''The Sunday Star-Times'' (21 May 2016). That should be more than sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)