Deletion of Armond Rizzo

Comment: I've not yet found the time to wade through all 29 citations here. {{re|Benmite}} the thread {{u|Celestina007}} referred to that I made at the Teahouse can be found https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&type=revision&diff=982502404&oldid=982502230&diffmode=source here. You simply cannot defend notability by saying that Google smothers good sources with lots of links to porn video pages!" Go find the sources if you want to assert someone's notability, and don't hide behind your feeling that they're there, but hidden. Try Google News, or Google Books, for example, where you might find they have (or haven't) been written about in detail and in depth by ''independent'' reliable sources. Using insider websites as  is akin to using press releases and business magazine articles used to promote a manufacturer of earthenware drainage pipes. There may be lots of them out there, but these self-promoting, pat-on-the-back news stories and pseudo-award pages like " sluice and drainpipe manufacturer of the year"  are simply not sufficient to show that one particular maker of drainpipes is 'Notable'. Same applies here. So, to save everyone the trouble of wading through your multitude of insider citations, please just link to just the three topmost ones which you feel clearly demonstrates this person's notability per  or . And avoid the , please. (Note that I have removed the CSD template as it was quite inappropriately placed by the same editor who previously AFD-ed this page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ENT||WP:NBIO||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: Lots of chaff here, but this performer may scrape by  with the ''Out'' and ''Pink News'' coverage.  Porn awards count for little without independent RS acknowledgemnt, but he seems to get it. Holding off on a !vote for a closer look. There is lots of ref bombing to sort through
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)