Deletion of Arun Kumar Pallathadka (2nd nomination)

Comment: In Wikipedia, it is possible for an author not to be notable under the provisions of uthor guidelines but to be notable in some other way under one of the other notability guidelines. Conversely, if an person is notable under  guideline, his or her possible failure to meet other subject specific notability guidelines is irrelevant. This is what we get from Wikipedia guidelines. So it is enough to pass any one or more guidelines as to be eligible to be on Wiki. However this subject passes , ,   and . I beg to differ with others over  and IMHO even sources from Leading Regional Language dailies such as Udayavani and Vijaya Karnataka are indeed reliable sources and meets . Their online absence and inability to keep archives is not to be taken as granted for rejecting them. Press Clippings uploaded in an Official website of a Cabinet minister cannot be considered as unreliable and unacceptable. I am not biased but what I am trying to say is accept to learn and respect regional languages as well. English is an Important communication language but the policy of ''we accept whatever which is in English and we dont accept whatever which we don't understand'' is not simply acceptable. If somebody don't understand any regional language then it is their problem and not the problem of that language. Sorry I just don't mean to offend anybody, I just felt and wanted to express. Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GOOGLETEST||WP:GOOGLECHECK||WP:GFG||WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I have tried to provide a rough translation/summary of those Kannada Articles at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arun_Kumar_Pallathadka Talk Page. It has been published in the Leading Regional Language dailies Udayavani and Vijaya Karnataka and they do meet . The clippings are deemed to be authentic in the absence of online archive of those news papers. And we cannot deny the fact that they have been republished in the official website of a Cabinet minister of a State. IMHO the articles have enough details to meet . I have also provided full publication information as per the available data. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: I found only one relialbe source,http://newindianexpress.com/states/karnataka/article187238.ece?service=print 'Writing is the best tool to correct society and that already is used in the article. That will allow the editors to include information about Arun Kumar Pallathadka in some existing article in Wikipedia, but it's not enought for a stand alone biography on Arun Kumar Pallathadka per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Agree with Vibhijain, Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: 1) Indeed it is true that the article has previously been deleted due to lack of reliable sources. But this does not mean that the article cannot be created again with reliable sources. WP:CSD#G4 is not applicable to this article; since the reliable sources have been added to the new article which were not present in the earlier article which was deleted earlier. 2) One of the references is the official website of a cabinet minister in the Government of Karnataka, Ms.Shobha Karandlaje and the enclosed articles in that page are from Udayavani and Vijaya Karnataka which are indeed leading regional dialies in the state of Karnataka. Another reference is of course from Indian Express which is a National English daily and undoubtedly a very reliable third party source. yet another reference is an independent and trusted third party website devoted to the promotion of authors/literature and can be taken as as a reliable source as well. 3) A simple search in google brings ample and multiple citations on the web including the fact that the said person is a member of a Governmental order called Knights of Rizal, Thailand chapter. 4) Further the first book written by him has sold more than one lakh copies in the international market and as per reliable source (ref:2) it is on its third edition with a print order of 2.5 lakh copies as on July 2010. The subject has also won a gold medal in a national-level scientific writing in English as per reliable source (ref:2). 4) The subject has written more than two books and two of them are available in google books online. 5) So in my humble opinion the article presently meets   and prima facie the article can be kept subject to removal of unverified contents as when it appears. Further I will try adding more third party sources and citations, once this afd is over. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)