Deletion of Sarah Hoyt

Comment: I am saddened to see that there is obvious sing going on here but I also see good arguments regarding the notability despite it not having been sourced before in the article. My question is which option is most likely to craft a good article back. Is it the  process suggested by Trillfendi or the eer Review option suggested by Letcreate123? I am fully willing to rescind my nomination to whichever of these is the best option as long as consensus can be agreed to on what will most likely make a good article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS||WP:DRAFTIFY||WP:P)

Comment: or ''' Keep'''.  The Prometheus Award and Dragon Awards and write up in ''The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction'' are more than enough to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: from above "I am saddened to see that there is obvious sing going on here.", {{u|6YearsTillRetirement}}, that is a pretty serious accusation, please provide details that this has indeed happened, otherwise please retract
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVAS)

Comment: WP:SNOW|what is all this white fluffy stuff?) easily meets  and  as brought out by above editors, another waste of time for afd editors, how many times does it have to be said - |article content does not determine notability, it really  doesn't matter how badly written an article is, if the subject is notable, then, they're notable, i note that even prior to the article being prodded, it stated that Hoyt has won the Prometheus Award (PA) -  (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sarah_Hoyt&type=revision&diff=900557117&oldid=897528971 see here), this alone means that she meets , so if the nominator had been bothered to going to the PA article they would have seen her name there, not only as a winner but also as a finalist on multiple occasions, as for this afd being reinstated by {{u|Bbb23}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FSarah_Hoyt&type=revision&diff=907550271&oldid=907536326 see here) (after being non-admin closed by {{u|Hullaballoo Wolfowitz}} (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sarah_Hoyt&diff=prev&oldid=907536326 see here)) with the comment "you cannot do that", um yes they can, having a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How an AfD discussion is closed and , this is almost a text book case of an afd being closed early ie. editor is experienced, uninvolved, registered; and the outcome at the time was a slamdunk "keep" (4 of the 6 editors specified "keep", the other 2 while not specifying "keep" testified to Hoyt's notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG||WP:ARTN||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NACD)