Deletion of Ido Pariente (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ido_Pariente speedy keep in the prior AfD nomination. And the fact that links that worked at the time of the prior AfD are now broken is -- of course -- not reason to not count them now. And of course the fact that he attracted |GNG coverage because of his fight with Shields counts towards GNG -- any other conclusion, which nom seems to have, is not based on how WP works
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Yes  is an essay but it reflects  which is a guideline and which he does not meet. Should also mention that fighting someone notable at some point does not confer notability either ().  It is important where they were fought.   The question raised is does he meet  - I will think about this a bit before I vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MMANOT||WP:NMMA||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: I don't think these sources are enough to show he meets GNG. What I see are fight announcements and results, which any fighter would have but these are routine sports coverage. The short interview with the Eastern Europe BJJ might count as significant coverage, but otherwise I'm not seeing supporting evidence of notability. He has no top tier MMA fights so he definitely fails  and I could find no coverage of him winning a pankration world championship even though I searched news media and several major pankration organization websites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA)

Comment: Although there's an attempt to pile on sources, they don't seem to show significant independent coverage. Passing mentions and routine sports reporting do not show he meets  and he doesn't meet any other notability standards. Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Coverage is extensive,there are two interviews (sources 8 and 11) in fighting magazines, and the brief interview with Eastern Europe BJJ. There are descriptions of many of his fights in bluelinked publications, like this one http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/John-Phillips-Submits-Chris-Fields-at-Cage-Warriors-Fighting-Championship-48-44363 from  Sherdog. Some coverage is driven by the fact taht there are not many Israeli professional fighters, it seems surprising to fight fans, so it gets covered.  As in this 2014 article http://www.mmafighting.com/2014/2/7/5390976/israeli-born-noad-lahat-to-make-ufc-debut-against-godofredo-pepey-at that brings Pariente in to make the point that Israeli prizefighters are unusual.  Coverage, however motivated, is ongoing and extensive, which is why this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA)

Comment: While editors are encouraged to look toward |Subject-specific Notability Guideliness when the |primary notability guideline is failed, when the primary notability guideline is '''NOT''' failed, we need not look to various SNGs to |decide that the primary notability guideline can be ignored and |decide, contrary to the instruction of the primary notability guideline, that |established notability does not exist. The SNGs do not overrule the GNG. What was brought to AFD a decent article that is well-sourced, informative to readers, and which serves the project. |Non-English coverage is perfectly fine.  The nominator also failed to tell us he did not meet  and ... other inappropriate SNGs that do not over-rule GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SNG||WP:GNG||WP:POV||WP:POV||WP:NRVE||WP:NONENG||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:CREATIVE)