Deletion of Open Doors

Comment: With no disrespect to the nom. Since the article was first nominated, independent sources toward its notability have been added and more shown to be available. I suppose this shows that  is actually . Good job to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AFTER)

Comment: I heartily agree with the efforts of groups such as this, but I also heartily agree with my own local church, and it's definitely not notable.  If it's not publicised, it can't have the |sources required for |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per improvements made to the article since the AfD was opened.  The article is now sourced with  which show |notability. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: and a good reminder to follow .  See http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22open+doors%22+%22brother+andrew%22&cf=all Google News for coverage in Christianity Today, Washington Post, Dallas Morning News, LA Times, Time Magazine, Orange County Register, and plenty of less well known RS outlets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)