Deletion of Red, White and Zero

Comment: Seems nom hasn't done the necessary .  Easily meets  per the following news items and reviews of the recent BFI Blu-ray release https://psychotroniccinema.com/2018/12/14/blu-ray-review-red-white-and-zero/https://www.thedigitalfix.com/film/content/100718/red-white-and-zero/http://wearecult.rocks/bfi-flipside-presents-red-white-and-zerohttps://www.mondo-digital.com/redwhitezero.htmlhttps://www.theartsshelf.com/2018/11/20/bfi-flipside-to-release-woodfall-films-rediscovered-red-white-and-zero/http://www.thespinningimage.co.uk/cultfilms/displaycultfilm.asp?reviewid=12125https://www.irishnews.com/arts/2018/12/21/news/cult-movie-red-white-and-zero-a-sharp-swinging-60s-flick-that-s-well-worth-the-effort-1510484/ etc, etc, etc...  Special:Contributions/212.135.65.247|212.135.65.247
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  and .  clearly was not followed. https://www.nytimes.com/1979/12/21/archives/screen-rossellini-brook-and-mostelteacher-and-curio.html?searchResultPosition=1 Here is the review of the film in ''The New York Times'' during its initial release (and if the nyt reviewed this British film you can guarantee the major UK and other international papers did as well) . I even found one substantial review from when the film was recently released on DVD this year. I have access through my university on ProQuest. "Red, White and Zero.(Staff Recommendations: Cineaste Editors Tout Favorite Recent DVD & Blu-ray Releases)"; Porton, Richard; ''Cineaste'', 2019, Vol.44(3), p.67(1) The film was also discussed in these books: https://books.google.com/books?id=gg7NUUuUXOYC&pg=PA33&dq=%22Red,+White+and+Zero%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3xIzD9bjlAhUVHTQIHcoJAtsQ6AEwAHoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Red%2C%20White%20and%20Zero%22&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=JshlDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA110&dq=%22Red,+White+and+Zero%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3xIzD9bjlAhUVHTQIHcoJAtsQ6AEwAXoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Red%2C%20White%20and%20Zero%22&f=false,https://books.google.com/books?id=2WdZAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Red,+White+and+Zero%22&dq=%22Red,+White+and+Zero%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3xIzD9bjlAhUVHTQIHcoJAtsQ6AEwBHoECAAQAg
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NFILM||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: as per the multiple reliable sources identified above which show that the film passes  including a review in The New York Times, Cineaste, and book sources, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: if significant RS coverage cannot be established) - Thanks for your invitation to participate here {{u|Atsme}}. I assume that I was contacted because I was the original creator of the article (i.e. Special:Permalink/429319083|a redirect I created back in 2011). Ignoring the question of the article-worthiness of the topic (which I haven't yet looked into), I do think that full deletion is inappropriate when it actually serves a good purpose as a redirect. The image shown in the infobox of ''The White Bus'' is only one version of the film. Others such as https://www.amazon.com.au/Red-White-Zero-Anthony-Hopkins/dp/B01EGQMEFC this show clearly that ''Red, White and Zero'' is a valid search term for this film. If this was an  proceeding I wouldn't hesitate to argue that #KEEP|#KEEP #3, 5, and 7 all apply. Again I haven't looked whether the topic meets GNG, but full deletion makes little sense to me when simple reversion (which maintains attribution) is available. I'll finalize my vote after I get a chance to consider the topic properly
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:RFD||WP:R)