Deletion of Michael "Atters" Attree

Comment: There are 30 citations here. Even if ''some'' of them could be said to have some self interest, firstly that is no reason to remove them (it's a reason to not ''rely'' on them, which is different), secondly there are still adequate cites that do meet  to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: mdash; (agree with the above, plus...) some of these sources are of an unusually high prominence for notability to come into question; i.e. major newspapers and magazines; it's also worth noting that the references provided span a number of years, indicating protracted notability. It's appropriate that we are cautious of any autobiographical or promotional elements, but that should encourage clean-up rather than be used to justify deletion of an article whose subject otherwise meets  and is verifiable. &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)