Deletion of Mady Hornig

Comment: Hornig appears to be a  in that her autistic mice study seems to be what she is best known for. However, it has received a lot of media coverage, so maybe she does meet the guidelines for academics. This article also seems to have followed a similar trajectory as Thomas Burbacher--it was created by an anti-vaccine editor as a coatrack for her controversial research that had been misinterpreted by the anti-vaccine movement, then was de-coatracked, leaving very little content behind. Incidentally, I am having a hard time finding any additional reliable sources that talk about Hornig and her research; all I can find are papers she has published and books she has written
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Clear pass of rof#C1 from GS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Six papers listed in Google scholar with over 100 citations each, including two as first author, on varied topics (including e.g. bee colony collapse as well as the autistic rodent stuff). I think that's enough to pass #C1  and demonstrate that she does not fall into 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E)