Deletion of Okta (company)

Comment: pure ; best to |blow it up and start again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ADMASQ||WP:TNT)

Comment: This article passes the test for me. It has produced evidence of notability, though I would like to see the referencing improve since a goodly number are PR style. There are sufficient solid, RS references for it to be acceptable here and the remainder need tidying up and replacing. There is an ANI discussion at present about the editor who accepted this through , arguably too early, where this has been mentioned, and that may lead to a reasonable number of opinions being placed in this discussion now. We must judge the article as it is today, not as it was once
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)