Deletion of Adele Lacy

Comment: passes #1 due to leading roles in ''Vanishing Men'' and ''When a Man Rides Alone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: I think we can agree that she meets , it's down to meeting general notability guidelines. ''Vanishing Men'' was the turning point for me, it's clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: Please can editors remind themselves that the criteria at , in common with all biography inclusion criteria, are considered ''additional'' - the General Notability Guideline still needs to be met. Head over to  and scroll to the top. It's not an either/or scenario
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: passes  Notability does not mean just having a wikipedia article it means it could qualify for one and those films seem to qualify as nationally reviewed, thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: With significant roles in 3 films, ''When a Man Rides Alone'', ''The Wyoming Whirlwind'', and ''Vanishing Men'', appears to barely pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)

Comment: If someone is a lead in multiple films, and the notability of those films has been established, then it should be presumed that there would have been critical coverage/analysis of that lead's participation in multiple films. Lead roles in multiple notable movies means that  can't be easily applied, and even a permastub article is somewhat useful and more pleasant than a permaredlink; WP is a ''hyperlinked'' encyclopedia. Her article really shouldn't have been created before one or both of the missing film articles were created/confirmed as notable, however, particularly since the sourcing used is poor (in particular, the Wordpress source that was a reference should ''not'' be used), and little is visible online. What RS information is there on her
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)