Deletion of Dixie Chicken (bar) (2nd nomination)

Comment: in the spirit of collectonian, kww, and mikeblas.  The sources given aren't sufficient to pass .  A trivial mention from the president is still a trivial mention.  Local sources aren't enough to justify wide-scale notability.  A monthly award from Playboy magazine is the only thing the bar has going for it, and restaurant reviews are not what playboy is well-known for.  A centerfold model in Playboy is notable because that's what the magazine is known for and that's its specialty, but since Playboy magazine isn't the Michelin Guide, the review can't be used as the sole indicator of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per others. Articles only need to be non-trivial if the references themselves are used to establish notability. Trivial mentions are perfectly acceptable to verify article content. There is more ways to establish notability beyond the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)