Deletion of African immigrants to the United States

Comment: a most notable topic, if you need proof http://www.africamigration.com/archive_02/j_takougang.htm, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79392768.html, and http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-06-16-africanimmigrants_N.htm were found within less than a minute, many more sources are in existance that are more than sufficient for |notabiliy. If a topic is notable than fixing the article is much better than deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as the nomination does not give a valid rationale for deletion. If nominator can't specify what information is out of date and how that "causes problems for people who don't know what it's about" I will change my position to |speedy keep as a nomination "so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: Outdated" is not a valid reason to delete an article. Also, could nom be more specific and indicate what exactly is outdated? Or even better, he could |be bold and go on updating the article with latest data
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)