Deletion of M Sarki

Comment: The reason "|notability" and "|vanity" are invoked as criteria for deletion is less that they are an extension of " an indiscriminate collection" then because of real concerns that the subject of the article is so obscure that he/she/it will in all likelihood not attract a good mix of involved, semi-involved and univolved editors. Chances are the article will always stand as a POV piece written solely by partisan editors with a strong involvement with the subject, failing  and often  and  to boot. This article is a perfect example why notability should be a concern. It's a gush piece, it's scraping the bottom of the barrel with a rusty spoon what |reliable sources are concerned, and it's even #Don't sign what you don't own|signed by the main author who seems to be the publisher of the subject's poetry if not in fact the subject him/herself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:VANITY||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:RS||WP:OWN)

Comment: WP:NN, likely . All a writer must do to be listed in ''Poets & Writers'' is fill out an application. I completed it in less than six minutes. I direct your attention to: http://www.pw.org/directory/writer/application_instructions.php P&W Application. In regards to Sarki's published works, self-published works are considered  |vanity. If there are other published works, are there ISBNs for the works? In addition, the list of published works in the article link to non-literary pages. I was unable to locate any literary publications by the names listed. M Sarki is not a notable poet, not yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY||WP:VAIN)