Deletion of Bug river

Comment: I don't completely understand the nomination. Would the nominator prefer that when a reader types "Bug river" into the search box, they are taken to a page of search results rather than this disambiguation page? From the disambiguation guidelines, "|if an ambiguous term is considered to have no primary topic, then that term should lead to a disambiguation page". Is there a primary topic here? If so, it should be at Bug river, with a hatnote pointing to the other article. But if there is no primary topic, this is surely the most helpful way of navigating the two articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:TWODABS)

Comment: I'm confused.  What exactly is the rationale for deletion?  What criteria does it fail or fail to meet?  I don't see the page as a problem, as a logical way to differentiate these two (and possibly others in the future that aren't listed yet), but before I !vote, just wanted to hear an actual criteria for the nomination to begin with.  "Not needed" sounds like very much like  or at least , which are not only invalid arguments in an AFD, but invalid reasons to nominate an article for deletion to begin with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USELESS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)