Deletion of N.O.H.A.

Comment: I likewise can't find anything that suggests this band meets any of the criteria of .  Answering Paul's comments, (1) no, being the article's creator doesn't prevent you from entering into any debate or discussion on it; (2) The French Wikipedia is an entirely separate entity, and how they apply their own rules and guidelines is their business; (3) There are millions of articles on Wikipedia, all created and edited by volunteers, and of course we haven't found every single one that doesn't meet our standards - that's exactly why we have AfD.  If you've found an article that doesn't meet policy or guideline, feel free to nominate it for deletion as well; (4) While the Besh O Drom article is poorly written (and I've just tagged it for cleanup), but the article asserts that the group had a platinum release in Hungary, which qualifies under criterion #3; (5)  I '''strongly''' urge you to read over .  It isn't enough for there to be "news items" about a group.  In order to fulfill the requirements for |reliable sources, such a release must be from a published, non-trivial independent, third-party reliable source and be substantively about the subject.  A blogpost about the ten bands a fellow liked at a music festival doesn't qualify.  A press release doesn't qualify.  A ''Rolling Stone'' article that's about nothing but the band does qualify, and we need more than one of those to fulfill criterion #1, for instance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC||WP:RS)