Deletion of List of omitted Bible verses

Comment: The title presumes there's a standard list of verses, some of which have been omitted. There's not. Locating at the article, it strikes me as non-encyclopedic. An encyclopedia article shouldn't be an incomplete list of verses out of context without explanation. What explanation there is ; see Matthew 18:11 for one example that assumes the verse was removed to change the meaning on the bible. (The quote-unquote |reliable source use for that says "F.D. Maurice was the principle man that Satan used to inculcate Unitarianism, Communism, and Universalism into Christianity". Not a source I'd quote as accepted fact.) I can see the value in an article that discusses the changes in the source texts for the Bible, and in fact Textus Receptus does a decent start on this. But neither the title nor the contents of this article are encyclopedic or NPOV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:RS)

Comment: First, the article title is wrong - this is not about "omitted Bible verses" but about differences between the KJV and NIV translations. Further, there is currently no proper sources, instead this looks like  with a  selection on text passages. However, the title could be adjusted, and there is tons of literature available comparing those two Bible versions - so the topic itself ''could'' have an article. If that seems better than having the information e.g. in Authorized King James Version or New International Version
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV)