Deletion of Andrew Cappuccino

Comment: He may in fact satisfy  as a notable medical researcher, even absent the Everett story. I looked up GoogleScholar and he does have a number of reasonably highly cited scholarly articles, with citation hits of 79, 58, 36, 30. The WP article for him also mentions some honors, albeit not major ones, like the "Health Care Hero 2005" (which, incidentally, precedes the Everett story by a few years). Based on the WP article material and the info on his web site, one could possibly make the case that he has been a significant innovator in the area of disc replacement. So, as I said, he might satisfy , but I am not sure about it and would like to hear from people more familiar with the standards in the medical research area
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: if fails, then fails . I would like to be convinced otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ONEEVENT)