Deletion of Fauxtography

Comment: as a neologism. Blogs are not |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I was the one who put this up for deletion, and I almost want to change my own vote, because of the disregard for the rules which people are performing by excercising such predjudice against this page. Come on people, the problem is that there are no reliable secondary sources as of yet, not that "evil bloggers" are trying to rule the world, or that neolgisms must be squooshed without mercy. The issue here is lack of established credible sources because it's way too young to have sources that qualify under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Actually quite the opposite is true- Wikipedia is not a |crystal ball. We won't post things in anticipation of them becoming popular/commonplace. Also, none of those links use the term "fauxtography" itself- they just mention photo manipulation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: and transwiki the first paragraph to wiktionary, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)