Deletion of Robert Turkel

Comment: If you ask me, this article fails , and the entire article seems to exist in order to promote JP Holding - not to present it in an encyclopedic manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: How does the ministry meet eb? What are all the non-trivial sources? How is it an independent web site? If someone can improve the article, and make it obvious why this is notable, I have no problem with it staying. If not, delete it and the ministry entry. I don't see anyone writing scholarly pieces about Turkel or the Ministry, but again, absence of proof is not proof of absence. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: Fails . While I am unfamiliar with the Christian apologetics movement, it seems clear that the article doesn't meet . The only sources sited are either Web sites belonging to the subject or his critics. What we need is a few neutral, unbiased sources to establish notability. As of now, the article fails to assert that subject and the ministry are adequately notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: to Tekton Apologetics Ministries which is currently a redirect to Turkel. The ministry meets 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: How does this meet  (for the merge people) and how does this meet  for the keep people? So we have 3 votes for k two are new users and one is the original author. I should have speedied this as it doesn't assert notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:BIO)