Deletion of Free Rider 2

Comment: There's a review on http://jayisgames.com/archives/2007/12/free_rider_2.php Jay is Games, which is good, but it alone cannot hold up an article per the multiple sources required for . There's also a review of the original game on http://jayisgames.com/archives/2007/03/free_rider.php the same site, but that leaves each with only one review and they're both from the same site, it's not workable in creating even a basic reception section (notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I think we should keep the page because it basically explains the games. Just because another site has a page of reviewing doesn't mean Wikipedia shouldn't have one as well. http://jayisgames.com/archives/2007/12/free_rider_2.php Jay is Games does have a review on it but what says just because one website has something on a specific topic doesn't mean that another website such as wikipedia can't have something as well. As for some of the other things such as the ''advertising'' for other websites, this is a valid point that those should not be there. Instead of removing the page all together, why don't we just remove the free advertising. BUT, i think it is interesting that if someone is looking at a page for an online flash game that is free, why not link to a place that they can find it. I know there is google and all that if people are really interested, but honestly, what is a few links to external sites going to hurt.Pages such as the page for Age_of_Empires contain links to external sites, theres right around 92 external links when i checked it just now. The FR2 page contains only like 5 or 10. I know this probably isn't a problem and considering you all say stuff about the  | Other Stuff Exists rules, therefore none of that really mattered. But honestly, what is a page devoted to explaining a page going to hurt. You'll probably flame me for all of that, but I sincerely don't see any problem with an extra page. This game is getting huge and when searching for http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=Free+Rider+2 "Free Rider 2" in google, wikipedia is the last one on the second page. I'm sure you'll say it's statistically proven that no one googles and looks at the second page, but i'm sure wikipedia has had a few hits that have proven beneficial to the website from this article. Thanks for reading
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: Article fails otability. Articles must receive coverage by reliable third-party sources, which Free Rider 2 has not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)