Deletion of GREENSOLE (2nd nomination)

Comment: per {{u|HighKing}}'s commendably detailed analysis above. The sources do not satisfy , so  is not met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:NCORP)

Comment: per the analysis above.  None of the sources pass the very low bar of  or , all of them fail either independence, reliability, or significance criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:42)

Comment: per the excellent nomination, following which little is left to be said. Except to point out that, along with their SPA-status as noted above, their deliberate deceit in recreating |protected material, their accusations of socking elsewhere, ''and'' notwithstanding their blatant |canvassing immediately above, they surely an undisclosed |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:CANVAS||WP:COI)