Deletion of Carpent tua poma nepotes

Comment: Although the article has been expanded quite a bit since it was nominated, it seems most of the new content is |original research. The references are an article about Roman slavery, not about this phrase, and conspiracy theory websites. The idea that we should consider those |reliable is laughable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: it certainly seems like original research or .  The quote is verifiable.  The information about slavery is verifiable.  but there is no sign that secondary sources have interpreted the quote to mean what the article here asserts it means
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)