Deletion of Paul Pantone

Comment: Arthur Rubin, guyonthesubway and Prebys, have persistently changed the date at which Pantone was locked away. Locked away without a sentence that is. when corrected they emediatly reinserted their lie back into the article, conveniently deleting 4 sources that contradicted their lie. 2 news articles, the actual court recordings and the Paul Pantone defence program.They have repeatedly deleted all my contributions from the article calling them "nonsense", delete as much as 8 sources at a time. The arguments for deleting things are all lies. The archive reflects they have done this drive-by and delete act before on this page.  clearly states they should behave themselves and treat people with respect. They apparently think they can just lie about the content that I dispute (|Redacted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP)

Comment: Notability has been established, IMHO, but not the presence of anything that can be said about him ''without'' violating , either of him, or of the judge.  (The statements made about the judge's ruling are legally inconsistent and unsourced, so clearly imply the judge is either an idiot or biased against Mr. Pantone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)