Deletion of Ciplex

Comment: Ciplex is described substantively in The Washington Post, H-Monthly, in Inc. Magazine as a Top 500 Company, Business Week, Engadget, and has received International Academy of Visual Arts recognition, and several Communicator Awards, all of which are reputable sources under  describing Ciplex. That's more than enough to get by the general notability requirements cited in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: This is an ''interactive agency that provides creative, technology, and marketing services. Ciplex specializes in web design, web development, branding, search engine optimization, social media and custom marketing campaigns for businesses.''  Inclusion in "top 500" lists and the like obviously does not confer notability on a business; nor do trade awards, given their proliferation.  A large number of the "separate" references in "multiple" sources appear to be the same story.  The rest of the sources would appear to be trade blogs, online profiles, and other self-published or low circulation sources.  The bottom line is that there's no showing of historical, technical, or cultural |significance; building the "World's First Multi-Touch Website Using Silverlight" does not cut the mustard, no matter how mightily Microsoft's publicity department has labored to promote Silverlight, and that appears to be what we're looking at in that coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I think the subject has been covered extensively by well respected journalistic resources and authorities, thus meeting the requirements of  and otability, as all of these sources are reliable sources  under our rules.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Article appears to be well references, but when looking at those references I have doubts that they meet . Needs improvement to survive this AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This subject is covered in major publications such as The Washington Post and Tech Crunch. Subject is also covered in the Inc. Magazine and is recognized across multiple reputable award sites. This meets the requirements of  and otability, as all of these sources are credible sources .  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: I fail to see how this meets  at the moment, because the only significant reliable coverage are about the first multi-touch website (whatever that is) but I can't find anything actually about ''the company''. People are correct to say it has been mentioned in multiple RSs but, they don't directly discuss the company and therefore we should not have an article on the company at present
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)