Deletion of Alta Ventures Mexico (2nd nomination)

Comment: I feel that this is a case of . The foundations are there for some probable notability in the future, and to a certain extent the idea of a venture capital firm operating in Mexico is a novel one. But in general, after having gone over all the sources in the article I feel that we are lacking more in-depth coverage of the company itself, instead of generally of the state of that industry in Mexico. The mentions by Gigaom and TechCrunch are at best routine, since they'll publish articles on anything with the letters 'VC' in them, and the rest of the coverage I'm seeing is a mix of press releases and non-reliable sources doing very superficial coverage of the founder(s). I agree with the nominator that this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The organization is in a new VC industry and has in a short amount of time made significant achievements and received sufficient notable coverage to merit creating and sustaining a page. The company coverage both from US and Mexico sources gives it . The  requirements do not state that a company be establish for any length of time only that topics and sources exist. I see no current mention of press releases on the company page only independent articles from CNN, IBM, Forbes, TechCrunch, Gigaom and DowJones and Mexico press which collectively meet and satisfy the requirements.  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/63.199.242.186|63.199.242.186
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON)