Deletion of Subrahmanyam Vijay Kumar

Comment: Fails . Nothing on searches helps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: U|AusLondoner}}, why do you think an article being promotional is not a reason for deletion? According to eletion policy, we can delete any article we think not suitable for the encycopedia, which in practice can only mean any reason that satisfies people at an AfD discussion. But it is much more specific than that: the specific policy is , one of our   fundamental policies, and much more critical than any  guideline like WP:Notability. (as I see it the principal purpose of the notability  guideline is to make sure we avoid content which could inherently only be promotional or directory.) To be sure,   G11 is limited to articles exclusively promotional not capable of being fixed by normal editing; but this implies that deleting those of  lesser degree need discussion, and AfD is the place. Agreed, that whether or not to delete something not so bad as to fall under G11 is a matter for decision article by article,and there can be valid different views on that. But if it does fall under WP:NOT, policy is that it ought to be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:PROMOTION)