Deletion of Jacqueline Mabey

Comment: can't see any evidence the subject meets the |general notability guideline, while there is coverage it's interviews and passing mentions in articles about Wikipedia editathons. Given the nature of the subject I would expect any references to be easily available online. The Foreign Policy mention would only count if it is a "well-known and significant award or honor" () and even then it would only indicate that she was ''likely'' to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: to Art+Feminism. One of 4 co-founders of a fairly minor "edit-a-thon" that seemingly only took place between 2014 and 2017. All of the references are for  which does have a justifiable level of coverage to have an article on its own, but this co-founder hasn't received coverage for anything else. To be honest, 3/4 of the co-founders probably aren't notable. I don't think we should have articles on everyone who co-founds an event because they got interviewed about it. This seems largely a place for this person to put their resume. Per the user's concerns, we can't just keep articles with poor or no sourcing in an attempt to , otherwise, we could end up putting out false information. I don't see how the nominator's support of the Gamergate movement is relevant. If this article goes to delete I will list Siân Evans (librarian) as well as she is also only notable for co-founding this event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT||WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS)