Deletion of American Sailboat Hall of Fame

Comment: from  ''"Notable here means "worthy of being noted"12 or'' '''"attracting notice"3''' '', not "important" or "famous". It is not synonymous with fame or importance. It is not measured by Wikipedia editors' own subjective judgements. It is not "newsworthiness
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: after good rewrite by Kevin Murray. It now has |reliable sources, notability has been established and everything's there. Don't see a problem yet, but I really hope it can be expanded further
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: the only real policy at stake is , which does not appear to be an issue.  I'm not aware of any guidelines that are specific to award-programs.  Since this award doesn't appear to be indiscriminate, and because it has gained usage and recognition (as evidenced by usage within the relavent media), I see no reason not to keep it.  And ironically, if a particular boat was given this award I think they'd probably be able to use it as an argument for their own notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)