Deletion of Shaycarl

Comment: per  criteria #1; he has won an Open Web Award, which is notable by WP standards. The article needs more sources to convince me to solid keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS)

Comment: sounds like rguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Crystal ball|Crystal ball to me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Keep''':  There is no question that Shaycarl is a very popular youtuber with a large online audience.  On the other hand, Shaycarl is similar to some other top youtubers in that the amount of press attention devoted to him is less significant than one would otherwise expect from his popularity.  This "gap" in youtuber press coverage was something I first noticed with Fred Figglehorn|FRED -- Fred was garnering millions of daily views on a regular basis back in mid 2008, but it took some time for him to be noticed by the press (and only then because his popularity was too great to ignore, and trust me, most journalists and people over 18 strive greatly to avoid watching FRED).  Shaycarl is not at the level of FRED at this point (his Shaycarl channel is #42 on most subscribed at youtube), and a strict application of  is going to make it difficult for articles like this to stay.  If the content in the article can be verified with citations, though, I would be in favor of '''keeping
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per  #1:  ''person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them''. (won the Open Web Award) and #2. ''The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.'' (2 of his channels are on the Youtube Top 25 Most Subscribed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I just worked on the article to see what (if anything) could be made of it, and the reality is that there are ''no'' good sources with which to write an article. His own YouTube channels do not count as a  about him. Other than that, he was one of three YouTube personalities covered in a small-town newspaper article by a high school student, and one of his channels won a popularity contest (the Mashable award). I just don't see how he passes , or any other notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)