Deletion of Agropedia

Comment: First, "written like an advertisement" is not a reason to delete an article.  It's a reason to rewrite from a |neutral point of view.  Second, a COI is not a reason to delete an article.  If Barack Obama had written the article on himself, he would still be notable.  Third, Spaceman Spiff has shown this article is marginally notable.Note: If the consensus is to keep, this article should be added to the List of online encyclopedias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The pieces from http://www.indianexpress.com/news/Pantnagar-Univ--IIT-s-ICT-project-for-farmers/471360 Indian Express and http://www.scidev.net/en/news/india-debuts-agricultural-wikipedia-.html SciDev show some notability, the collaboration partners and the funding agencies are all individually notable (and while probably not relevant to notability, the concept is an innovation in a country with such a large agri-economy). Send to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)