Deletion of List of number-one music downloads of 2010 (Canada) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Classic example of why you on't bludgeon the process, even if you are a Hammer.  Should be withdrawn until the "flaws" have had to the opportunity to be worked out, since it just slid through AFD less than 10 minutes prior to the nom.  Sorry Hammer, but jeez, give an article 30 days between AFDs and you don't have to hear this stuff, then there isn't a question about faith in the nom and it can stand on its own merits.  While my personal experience has been that Hammer acts in good faith, he has to understand that it looks bad when you stack AFDs that way, and honestly, nothing is gained by bludgeoning it, and nothing is lost by waiting a wee bit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)

Comment: Holster that trout pardner,  means that one is free to renominate 8 seconds after the close if he wants to
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NPASR)

Comment: due to failing .  If it can't be verified (and someone saying that they saw it at some point nor do I consider Wayback to be wholly reliable) it shouldn't be included, regardless of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: There does appear to be a misunderstanding here that  requires that sources are easily accessible online
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)