Deletion of Asa Akira (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails PORNBIO. A single notable award nomination doesn't cut it. While she may ''appear'' to be headed toward a promising porn career, we don't |go on predictions when deciding whether to keep or delete. She gets an article when she meets our inclusion standards, not before because it may save time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Fails .  A single, apparently minor and undocumented role on a radio show should not be enough to satisfy the "multiple" requirements of the guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: The previous AfD actually closed as "no consensus", which does not establish that it passed notability criteria. The guidelines at  require any of: winning a well known award, being nominated in multiple years for a well known award, being a Playboy Playmate, making unique contributions to a specific genre, or being mentioned multiple times in notable mainstream media. This person does meet any of these criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: I guess you mean this link http://www.avn.com/movies/87855.html, but I still don't think this is sufficient to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Narrowly passes  in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Sorry hun, but you just don't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)