Deletion of Valentin Koulikov

Comment: I agree with Nsk92 that  appears to be more relevant than  — the article does not indicate that he has an academic appointment and the theories it describes are highly nonstandard. But regardless of whether we consider , , or , he does not seem to pass — I can find nothing in Google books, Google news archive, and Google scholar to indicate that his theories have had any impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: This is a random list of facts about a |fringe theorist.  I can't see how he's |notable, and none of the sources can |verify that he's notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: Does not pass  or . No verifiable evidence of significant citability or coverage of his work by other researchers, no significant academic awards, editorships, etc, or evidence of satisfying any of the criteria of . GBookshttp://books.google.com/books?hl=en&q=%22Валентин%20Куликов%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=sp and GScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Валентин%20Куликов%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ps searches for his name in Russian return basically nothing of relevance. Moreover, appears to be a  case, so that  also requires passing  for inclusion. No evidence of significant biographical coverage by independent sources either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom. No evidence of notability per , looks promotional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Wikipedia:Notability generally requires ''independent'' reliable sources discussing the subject (rather than just articles published by the subject himself), and none of the citations qualify; also doesn't seem to qualify under the specific guidelines for  as noted above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)