Deletion of Criticism of Bill O'Reilly

Comment: does have some serious  problems, but that's a cleanup job, not a deletion rationale in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: suggest closure .  Should not be merged.  Was bad faith nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: to Bill O'Reilly. It seems to me to be a |POV fork, and several parts of the article are unreferenced (and therefore potentially defamatory); having a separate article for criticism of him seems to me to be |undue weight. However, there is enough sourcing, from reliable sources, to demonstrate that he's attracted some notable criticism; as such, the most prominent criticism should be summarised and merged to the main article, along with the relevant sources
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:NPOV)