Deletion of Spontaneous Combustion (English band)

Comment: easily notable with releases on major labels such as EMI https://www.allmusic.com/artist/spontaneous-combustion-mn0000157360/discography as shown here and Capitol Records passing  criteria 5 (only one criteria needed) and with significant coverage such as album reviews in Billboard and Melody Maker. Yes there are many unreliable sources such as discogs that need replacing but that is no reason to take the easy deletion route and ignore the reliable sources and the notability of the band, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: The nominator is correct about the article's reliance on unreliable social media sources, but that is a matter of |cleaning up rather than deleting. The article needs to be ''significantly'' reduced to eliminate excessive |fancruft informed by that same social media chatter. But it can be narrowed down to basic facts supported by some reliable sources on 70s progressive rock, as located by the previous voters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:FANCRUFT)