Deletion of Trinity Christian High School (2nd nomination)

Comment: There is no consensus that schools are or are not inherently notable, as evidenced by the many school AfDs closed with 'no consensus'.  However, the state championships earned by this school's sports program appears to make it sufficiently notable for inclusion.  Two more things: 1) I moved Lil Miss Lubbock from the school awards section to Notable Alums and Students as this is a personal award, not the school's, and 2) As I have noted above, informing a few people known to be interested in a subject area of a pending AfD is considered perfectly acceptable "Friendly Notice" pursuant to anvassing.  Just don't get carried away.  ;-P
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: All of the information comes from |reliable and |verifiable sources and |notability is more than demonstrated. To the exact opposite of your biased view, the fact that almost all schools win state tournaments, have notable alumni, receive awards and recognition and have this supported by reliable and verifiable sources is the definitive proof that almost all schools are notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: I see some sources here, but most of it is all local - so not only am I working with , now  comes into play.  The question then begs as to whether the school is notable outside of Lubbock, TX, and I would say "no" - and just because a student has become a member of the Cincinatti Reds baseball team doesn't make it notable (notability by extension doesn't exist), it just means that a kid got lucky
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:LOCAL)

Comment: All of the information comes from |reliable and |verifiable sources. Can you point me to the non-local rule that requires sources to be some distance from the source provided
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: The school's dozens of state championships is a rather explicit claim of notability. Can you point me to the requirement in  that mandates that "out-of-state references" are required to demonstrate notability? I'd love to see this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Note to admin''  - I suggest that  now applies; the balance is now about 39-11 in favour of Keep (and yes I know its not a vote :-) ) and the nominator has effectively withdrawn the nomination by changing to 'Weak keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: well, hey, you're absolutely right.  It does say so right there.  Oh, darn.  I guess your opinion pretty much just overrides , and I'm just gonna have to change my vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: http://www.google.com/search?as_q=%22Trinity%20Christian%20High%20School%20(2nd%20nomination)%22%20%2Dwikipedia&num=50&hl=en&lr=lang_en&as_ft=i&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i google search for "Trinity Christian High School" shows no hits; identical results for Yahoo! and MSN searches. In addition,  states: "...''Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by sources that are reliable and independent of the organization''..." - since there are no sources |cited (and no search hits are received) it is safe to assume that the article is non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:CITE)

Comment: per #A7: "An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject." A high school is a "group of people" and therefore subject to this criterion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)