Deletion of TearSolutions

Comment: As far as meeting the . It has received coverage from sources that both reliable and independent such as the Journal of Biological Chemistry{{cite web|url=http://www.jbc.org/content/289/32/22172.short|title=A Cleavage-potentiated Fragment of Tear Lacritin Is Bactericidal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I PRODed this, not realising it had already been done before. My rationale was: "|Non-notable company. It has only received coverage from the University of Virginia, which is not independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)