Deletion of Kolkata Test Match 2001 Ind vs Australia

Comment: per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Has historic notability, as can be seen by looking for sources more than a year after the event. The match "set a world record for squandering a first-innings lead to lose a Test" (''The Independent'', 2003)http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cricket/was-this-test-crickets-greatest-comeback-576866.html; it was a "historic Test match" (''Sydney Morning Herald'', 2003)http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/14/1068674386006.html; "the famous Kolkata Test of 2001" (''The Age'', 2007)http://www.theage.com.au/news/cricket/india-facing-mammoth-target/2007/12/28/1198778695304.html; "the memorable 2001 Kolkata Test match" (''news.com.au'', 2008)http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21598,24579187-5005401,00.html; the "Miracle of Calcutta" (''The Times (South Africa)'', 2008)http://www.thetimes.co.za/Sport/Article.aspx?id=672104; "stunning turnaround" (''The Jamaica Observer'', 2004)http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/sports/html/20041028T170000-0500_68388_OBS_AUSTRALIA_TURN_THE_SCREWS_ON_INDIA_IN_THIRD_TEST.asp; "Dravid and Laxman inspired one of the greatest comebacks" (''BBC'', 2003)http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/3317507.stm; "a famous victory" (''The Age'', 2003)http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/02/1070351577277.html and many more found by http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2002&as_user_hdate=2009&um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=(Kolkata+OR+Calcutta)+%2B%22Test+Match%22+%2B2001+%2BIndia+%2BAustralia&lnav=od&btnG=Go a Google News search. None of these articles was written in the immediate aftermath of the events, so #NEWS doesn't apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)