Deletion of Noah Ringer (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:ENT is superceded by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I have tagged this article for |rescue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:ARS)

Comment: Meets  by some margin, regardless of any other guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree, this kid is clearly notable. Just because someone hasn't heard of him (I haven't) doesn't mean he fails .  The ''Los Angeles Times'', ''Variety'', ''USA Today'' say differently
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per significant coverage in reliable sources. That's more important than marginal debates around the edges of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: I have added some references. Actually, Rodhullandemu, it is enough if it is sourced, if you read  more closely. The basic criteria stands alone. The Additional Criteria, which is specific for different things, states, "''A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. A person who fails to meet these additional criteria may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENTERTAINER)