Deletion of Morton Brilliant (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Collect's excellent arguments above.  is regularly abused and misinterpreted to mean "delete any article for any person whose notability can be traced backed to a single event, regardless of anything else that has occurred in their life", and this selective misuse of policy is only further perpetuated here.  Even for those who believe BLP1E is a valid justification to not have an article for Morton, the refusal to follow BLP1E's guidance and renaming the article -- "In such cases, a redirect or merge are usually the better options. Cover the event, not the person." -- is only further evidence that the policy is being abused. The absurd statement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Apart from the sources related to his Wikipedia adventure (which is |just one event covered elsewhere), there are only two sources: one to Sourcewatch (a wiki and therefore not a |reliable source) and one to the above-mentioned opinion piece found by DGG. The latter is actually not about Brilliant, but about Cathy Cox and only mentions Brilliant in passing. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: as per DGG. The article is not complimentary to him, but that's a function of his own behavior, not any bias in the article's description of him. He is reasonably prominent in multiple major statewide campaigns -- more than satisfies the requirements of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)