Deletion of Skiddle

Comment: Fails  and . Struggling to find more than passing mentions in reliable sources. Even if the company could be deemed notable, I cannot imagine anyone wanting to put in the effort required to turn the current article into something acceptable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Take the above with a pinch of salt. Article has only been edited by a small number of SPA editors (mostly unregistered), transparently conflicted. Obviously it's not for the company to 'demonstrate notability' - we have guidelines against which to measure that and the ability to do so without interference from the biased subject. A bit more info following a more in-depth check of notability - they only joined their industry body STAR earlier this year. Going through about 6 pages of google results, all there was was a couple of articles in industry publications, some info on small scale niche blogs, standard stuff from a public facing company like their social media profiles and duedil.com etc and not much more. They are still very far from  in my view despite how many people they provide a service for
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I created this page many years ago , however I haven't edited the page for a number of years and it's been edited by a large number of people in the intervening period. Skiddle is one of the UK's main primary ticket outlets and I believe they are still regarded as the events website with the largest number of events listing, they provide a service for millions of visitors to their website each month. I think they can easily demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)