Deletion of Wave disk engine

Comment: This is the subject of extremely wide coverage. Even if it was only hype, it would be sufficiently successful hype to warrant an article. But it's also a research topic with numerous Google Scholar hits. Looks like a pure  nomination to me or a very fundamental misunderstanding of our notability criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: The references are legitimate, and to state this doesn't exist is generally incorrect.  There is a prototype. Considering how much coverage this prototype has gotten then, and the fact that the project is being funded by the United States government (DARPA particularly, I think), this is a keeper.  I'm calling for closure at this point, despite the above notes, per  - while there is, indeed, legitimate discussion, I don't foresee anyone else calling for a deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: 3rd party refs are there and although we aren't all driving them yet, it's way past 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)