Deletion of Deichkind

Comment: If that's the case, then perhaps you will add the required |reliable sources before this AfD completes. The article itself must be sourced; it's not sufficient for you to think it's notable. It must be sourced. That's an absolute
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: no claim to notability and fails teh 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: All I am saying is that there must be some way to verify that this article is noteworthy. Our policy is at  and says in part ''The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a reliable source, which should be cited in the article. Quotations should also be attributed. If an article topic has no reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.'' I simply challenged the article as being notable and thought that if you were familiar with the subject you could source it. I'm not asking you to do anything I haven't done myself. Please be assured, I have no interest in this article one way or another. If it can be sourced and verified, then let's keep it. I'm not sure what you mean about referencing every argument in an AfD. I never asked for such and certainly don't expect it. Why don't we get on with editing the Wikipedia. If you can improve the article, please do. I cannot. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)