Deletion of Sudden Jihad Syndrome

Comment: as .  The article concedes that the phrase is a |neologism, but that's not the critical problem; it appears to have some currency among http://www.google.com/search?i&q=%22sudden+jihad+syndrome%22 bloggers.  The real problem here is that I see only  http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/08/06/a_tale_of_2_stories_about_anti_semitism/ one reference to a |reliable source.  All other references in the article that associate this term with specific incidents are |original research, as the associated articles don't use this term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: Sensible commentators haven't touched it, but there are 60,000+ hits from the likes of Little Green Footballs and other sloughs of irrationality.  Generally, a blog doesn't meet the standards of  as a source for a fact -- but a fact about blogs, such as that many blogs use a term, can be considered when we try to adjudicate notabiliity.  In addition, there are at least a couple uses that are neither Pipes himself nor right-wing blogs, e.g. http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=256521423294106 Investor's Business Daily.  My bottom line is that the term is out there enough that someone might see it, be unsure whether it's a real "Syndrome" or just some Islamophobe's rhetorical device, and come to Wikipedia seeking enlightenment.  This article presents uses by Pipes and others and now includes a criticism that I added.  It will therefore enlighten that hypothetical reader more than would a redirect to Daniel Pipes; the latter article couldn't readily accommodate all this detail
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per #SOAP|not a soapbox. If some serious psychological study comes up with a similar theory then by all means let there be an article that covers aspects of such a study. Also per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)