Deletion of Menstruation and the origins of culture

Comment: Non notable, theory that appears to be a large #SYNTHESIS|OR Synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as per nom and . Academic colonization ( issues) of wikipedia space to support a particular theory without supporting evidence that the theory has had a major impact on discourse. The article presents a very simplistic view of the anthropological study of ritual, morality and kinship by suggesting that the origins of culture can be uncontroversially asserted to have emerged in this specific biological way. This discourse is actually highly contested. Most Cultural anthropology|cultural anthropologists would be alarmed by the Darwinist/Marxist reductionism (as well by the sociobiology|sociobiologically-inclined author's apparent lack of fieldwork experiencehttp://www.timothyjpmason.com/WebPages/Publications/Knight.htm). If it is proved that this theory has had a widespread enough impact to justify an article, the article would need to be much more balanced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:COI)

Comment: Textbook |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)