Deletion of Airi & meiri

Comment: A lot of |puffery but nothing indicating that the duo have been analysed by independant, reliable third-party source, required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFF||WP:N)

Comment: No evidence that this duo satisfies  (they are just minor porn actresses) or other more general notability requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: This should be an easy keep. Well cited and easily passes  or , The fact that the nominator even suggested that this is CSD A7 shows strong bias toward . Huge idols in Japan and has been cited in several notable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:NOTE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: edit conflict)- When adding material or sources make sure that you do not engage in ery, and that all material is from |reliable sources. I have reverted a bunch of changes and "sources" added to the article, most of them from blogs, promotional materials, and catalogs. Please read  and  as to what constitute establishing notability: we are not disputing that these women exist, we are disputing that they are notable enough for inclusion here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFF||WP:RS||WP:PORNBIO||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: The rules at  clearly state: "Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media."  The magazines she has appeared in, satisfies that requirement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: No opinion on the deletion either way but how is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Airi_%26_Meiri&diff=275760740&oldid=275757833 reverting tags for problems that aren't solved reprehensible?  If this survives AFD somehow, I'd put those exact same tag up anyways.  Is the timing so significant that it warrants completely ignoring 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: the article MARKEDLY IMPROVED since this discussion began, as both meeting the criteria of  and in curbing the enWiki's anglo-centric systemic bias. Let's  folks, as using the relevent guidelines, it NOW passes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:AGF)