Deletion of Cory Williams (2nd nomination)

Comment: takes a deep breath* Profile in Modesto Bee: http://www.redorbit.com/news/business/728030/new_media_meets_tv_turlock_resident_attains_cult_status_with/index.html. Profile in smaller newspaper The Acorn: http://www.toacorn.com/news/2007/0913/Community/021.html. He's the host of The FIZZ on DirectTV. According to the Associated Press, he founded the "As One" YouTube Gathering: http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/08/22/youtube_vloggers_congregate_offline/. CNET write-up of the gathering: http://www.news.com/2100-1025_3-6160390.html. Associated picture: http://www.news.com/2300-1025_3-6160378-1.html  He's a partner in the YouTube revenue sharing program, which might help him fulfill 's ''The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster''. He's the 34th most subscribed YouTuber, which gives him some amount of name recognition, considering that YouTube is the 4th most visited website in existence, behind Yahoo, Google and MSN. But all that said, I wouldn't mind too much if we just merged the notable stuff to YouTube celebrities. His article attracts the ire of visiting Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica|Encyclopedia Dramatica editors, for whatever reason, making it a prime vandal target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The arguments made at the Emmalina and Renetto AfDs apply here, as well.  When determining the notability of YouTube celebrities, it makes |sense to factor in YouTube prominence with whatever reliable sources there are, in the same way we would factor in film or television roles when determining the notability of an actor.  So long as we keep the barrier set at a "fair" amount of coverage in reliable sources, which I think this article has, Wikipedia won't be flooded by YouTuber articles, while still being able to proportionately represent the YouTube phenomenon
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:SENSE)

Comment: seems to just|barely scrape by . Too many of the article's sources are iffy due to COI and should be better disclaimed, and the tone is promotional (as often happens with borderline cases trying to better assert notability, thereby crossing the line into spam
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)