Deletion of Let the bodies pile high

Comment: to Premiership of Boris Johnson. I don't think this meets  yet, although it is impossible to know whether it will in the future if it still receives attention. British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic is already pretty bloated (195k) so not a great merge target and likewise, the main Johnson article can't go into any detail about it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per  and . The controversy itself is probably enough to merit mentioning somewhere, but not to have a stand-alone article, as most of the references appear to be parroting each other
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIVERSE||WP:SENSATIONAL)

Comment: second choice: merge with British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic). Fleeting news coverage of a story originated by the unreliable ''Daily Mail''. Later BBC and ITV repetition of sources for these claims make it permissible to mention, but not notable. 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Neither verifiable (the only sources are word-of-mouth), nor necessarily true given he has denied it, including in the House. Also note  and , the latter of which almost certainly will not pass
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YEARTEST)

Comment: per . We don't create a new article for every bit of sensationalised and unsubstantiated hearsay and tittle-tattle stirred up by disgruntled former advisors and supporters of opposition parties - do we
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: ping|smartse}} The comment surfaced in a tabloid, and its only evidence is tabloid-based. The BBC/Sky saying "the Daily Mail said" doesn't make them independent in their own right, they are simply re-reporting a  and  story
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:TABLOID||WP:DAILYMAIL)

Comment: ping|Spa-Franks|JackFromWisconsin|Vami_IV|Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI}} Your rationales completely mistate what  and  are about. Multiple reliable sources have discussed this quote so it is definitely verifiable and not a BLP violation. We are not arbiters of , we simply repeat what others have said
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BLP||WP:TRUTH)