Deletion of Edward Malnick

Comment: per . It doesn't qualify for speedy, however (stating the subject has articles published in newspapers is a claim of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Please vote only once.  You have voted "Keep" now three times, and if someone looks quickly over the debate, it seems like there are twice as many  keep votes as there really are because of it.  Secondly, you are partially right: that is what it says in .  However, bear in mind that many people are published daily / weekly in a letters to the editor section, so not ''every single person'' who is published really deserves an entry.  My friend's mom has had a letter of hers published in ''People.''  That doesn't mean she deserves an article here.  Secondly, this does not "settle this dispute;"  Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus settles the discussion.  Thirdly, please sign your comments.  Fourthly, now that I've said all that, I really don't know whether or not he was featured as a real contributing editor or if he was featured in some kind of smaller, bit-writing roll.  I'mm keeping my vote delete based on the google results, but if someone can provide me with a source that he was ''really'' contributing to these newspapers - and in a relatively meaningful way - I'd be sure to change my vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)