Deletion of Lil Keed

Comment: per DOOMSDAYER520 and a Google search provides reliable sources to support notability, passes #5 through https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/lil-keed-unleashes-keed-talk-to-em-with-21-savage-trippie-redd-and-more-new-mixtape.118726.html this. The subject is also signed to a notable record label
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Meets . Coverage in reliable sources including https://www.complex.com/music/2019/03/lil-keed-offset-move-it Complex, https://www.thefader.com/2018/10/29/lil-keed-wop-video-premiere-interview/amp TheFader, https://www.xxlmag.com/news/2019/02/lil-keed-interview-the-break/ XXL, https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/lil-keed-and-offset-link-up-for-trap-single-move-it-new-song.1982313.html HotNewHipHop, https://www.elevatormag.com/lil-keed-speaks-on-touring-with-trippie-redd-social-media-and-drakes-cosign/ Elevator Magazine and https://pitchfork.com/levels/lil-keed-nameless-new-song-listen/ Pitchfork
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: See my comment above on reliable sources, in which this rapper has a few introductory articles. Those media mentions are indeed brief and some are reliant on interviews in which the rapper merely talks about himself, but the coverage shows some minor notice in the hip hop community, perhaps enough for a stub here. If the article is kept, promotional language needs to be removed, and I would not argue with anyone voting to delete under the  standard. But previous delete arguments based on suitability of sources are not convincing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: has coverage in multiple reliable sources as per Doomsdayer so passes criteria #1 of  and has also released on a notable record label so should be included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)