Deletion of Protest Warrior

Comment: I'm curious which requirement of  you feel this organization fails to meet. The external links include articles about the group from MSNBC and the Washington Post, so they seem to be notable.—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This nomination reeks of bad faith. The organization has had significant media coverage and there are enough |reliable sources for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This AfD and the parallel AfD for The_White_Rose_Society_(website)|White Rose Society eloquently make the case for revisiting  and . I realize I'm a relative newcomer, but I'm no meatpuppet, and it seems to me that there should be a strong bias towards '''keep''' in any case. If an article with marginal notability remains in the encyclopedia, what is the harm? Surely the damage done by keeping an article that is arguably non-notable is much less than the damage done by deleting an article that is arguably notable. Setting a high bar for inclusion invites this sort of bad faith nomination, especially for articles on politically-charged topics. Keep this article, keep the article on the The_White_Rose_Society_(website)|White Rose Society, keep the article on Ben Burch, and keep political debates where they belong... i.e. not here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT)

Comment: meets |notability requirements per Kimchi.sg. Plus an organized right wing protest group is notable because of its rarity and the fact that it hasn't managed to achieve large scale support. It tells us a lot about the political culture in the USA at this time that there are "left wing" protest organization that can get hundreds of thousands of people onto the streets, but the "right wing" cannot. That alone makes this notable and encyclopedic, regardless of your political viewpoint
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: notable organization. Use of Alexa is misguided in this case. Protest Warrior ''has'' a web site but that doesn't mean it ''is'' a web site;  doesn't apply here. Rather, the group is known for its organization of counterdemonstrations in real life, as discussed in the sources cited in the article. The group is still active and continues to be mentioned in news coverage of events where it engages in counterprotests http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060320/NEWS10/603200339/1016/NEWS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)