Deletion of Crash Override Network

Comment: Handily meets  for independent, in-depth coverage, in this case covered by ''Wired'', ''PC Magazine'', ''Christian Science Monitor'', ''National Monitor'', ''The Daily Telegraph'' and more. A |trout for the nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TROUT)

Comment: I agree with previous keep comments. It meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)

Comment: Clearly meets , and I wouldn't have started the article otherwise. I don't think it should be merged with Zoe Quinn as this article will be of interest to people like me who have no interest in gaming and game developers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)

Comment: do note that the  do not allow us to use our subjective criteria for determining the notability of a subject. The guidelines are clear: in-depth, independent coverage.  The topic itself has generated in-depth coverage. I would agree with your logic if the sources mentioned this in passing when discussing Zoe Quinn or Gamergate, however, this is not the case; hence, Wikipedia policy would suggest that this subject merits it's own, separate, article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)