Deletion of Nxt (2nd nomination)

Comment: I've had some time to look at the article and it has numerous problems--quite a bit of original research, a dearth of reliable secondary sources (most of the references are forum posts, wikipedia articles, technical documentation, self-published sources, or first party sources/sources with a financial stake in NXT. On top of that, it reads like an advertisement in places. Maybe the best thing is to  and start over with a shorter article grounded in the reliable secondary sources that DO exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:KIBOSH)