Deletion of Gerald Walpin firing

Comment: An intentionally inaccurate, misleading and extremely unbalanced article started by Special:Contributions/Grundle2600|Grundle2600—about the firing of a non-notable inspector general (one of sixty-four federal inspector generals)—that blatantly violates  policy and is designed as a  on which to hang an anti-Obama conservative editorial (''The Wall Street Journal'') and opinion column (David Limbaugh in the Jewish World Review
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: I was looking for a template to use, but Template:Spa doesn't fit the situation very well. {{u|McGuiness}} is a 2-day old account, and {{u|Dhruvsha}} made one vandalism edit 2 years ago, then inactive til what amounts to an unsigned "keep" vote was left on this page's talk page just now.  Apologies to Messr's  & , but I can count the number of AfD's I've ever initiated on one hand, so I find it a bit peculiar that this is being hit by newcomers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BITE)

Comment: the references provided demonstrate that this event is sufficiently notable to be worthy of a Wikipedia article. I would, however, suggest deleting or merging Gerald Walpin - he isn't notable in his own right, we don't need both articles, and  advises us to 'cover the event, not the person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)