Deletion of Daniel Larimer

Comment: he's almost notable, but currently the  information we have about him is of the "X did Y" routine variety.  The Roanoke Times piece is a RS, and although it has some useful bits of information that could be used it is a local-interest story, more about bitcoin phenomonem than Larimer.  The Forbes piece is the best we have, and  the sum total of what we have isn't really enough to create an encyclopedic NPOV article, just a resume
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)