Deletion of Barry J. Gillis

Comment: without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody without a |conflict of interest can do better than this. What I'm getting from the sourcing is not strong evidence of notability-supporting coverage ''about him'', but a cluster |reference bomb of mostly |primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence; what I'm getting from the writing tone is "semi-|advertorial attempt at self-promotion" rather than "encyclopedia article"; and what I'm getting from this discussion is that all but one of the keep votes above have come from |single-purpose accounts with little to no prior edit history, including the article creator, the article creator's roommate and the article subject himself — but all of the comments, either above or on the article's talk page, which are signed "Barryjedmonton" were posted ''by Donairpizza'', not by a user who is actually registered as "Barryjedmonton", so Donairpizza's claim to be unaffiliated with Barry Gillis is very obviously false.There are potentially valid notability claims here, but this is mostly not the referencing that turns a notability claim into a notability slam-dunk — and even if he ''does'' have a valid notability claim, the article ''still'' has to be written ''neutrally'' by somebody ''without'' a conflict of interest. We are ''not'' a place where Barry Gillis is entitled to write about ''himself'' for PR purposes, whether directly or by paying somebody to do it for him — we're an encyclopedia, where the content has to be written neutrally and independently by people who ''don't'' have a vested interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:NOTADVERT||WP:SPA)

Comment: assuming the mention in the 3 book sources is a trivial mention; given that the mention in the 4 reliable sources regarding the film festival advertisement are not sustained coverage of him and are concerned with a single event (and the National Post article is a copy and paste of the CTV News article); and the 3 remaining sources don't add up to enough to satisfy . However I stripped this article back to its constituent parts and it should be available should anyone else wish to pick it up and add to it if new material comes to light
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FILMMAKER)