Deletion of Karikku (2nd nomination)

Comment: There has been mention of paid editing in this discussion.  {{U|Tachs}}(jojo@nthony) has invited scrutiny of his home page as evidence of no paid editing, and I personally opine that is not a suitable in itself for any such determination, although obviously we have contribution history as well, which perhaps gives some some input.  I do seem to note quite a number biographies of deceased persons and it it unlikely in my opinion these would have been subject to paid editing.  I note also some BLPs and maybe some organisations within the set where there might perhaps been risk of a request being made for a paid edit, but I also judge they are within the range of his normal writing interests as far as I can tell  So while Tachs/jojo@nthony probably has the skills for paid editing, as do many of us, I have no reason to assume it has occurred and  certainly assumes it should not.  In terms of the current article {{Tlx|TempUndelete}} on the previously article incarnation and the draft article would be needed for further scrutiny (unless one is an admin) so I see purposes here at this AfD to determine if this incarnation of the Karikku article is fit for mainspace based on its current content and available sources.  Thankyou
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: The precious metal play button is a |promotional award that is similar to awards that are commonly given in the book publishing and distilled spirits industries.  These awards are easy to get, because the real objective of the trade associations for the industries is to increase sales, of books or of spirits, respectively.  So the awards prove only membership in an effective trade association, and YouTube is functioning as a trade association
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)