Deletion of Horned King

Comment: and tag for cleanup. The subject being covered in multiple reliable sourceshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1984&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Horned+King%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Horned+King%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go and in multiple bookshttp://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Horned+King%22 independent of the subject, allows a resonable presumption of real-world notability though its coverage in real-world sources.  Yes, the article needs sourcing... but that current lack is a |surmountable issue that does not require deletion, only improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)