Deletion of Mumtaz Kahloon

Comment: The role is significant enough that he could keep a ''well-referenced'' article that properly established that he passes , but it is not an "inherently" notable role that automatically ''guarantees'' him an article just because he exists. NPOL serves to clarify what's accepted as a notability ''claim'' for a politician, but politicians ''do'' still have to have |reliable source coverage ''about them'' before they actually get in the door — which legislators always do, even if our articles aren't always very good at actually ''using'' all of their coverage, but appointed officials may or may not. But four of the references here are just glancing namechecks of his existence in articles where he is ''not'' the ''subject'', and one is a piece of his own bylined writing on the |self-published website of his own company — which means five of the six footnotes are doing absolutely nothing at all in terms of establishing his notability. And the only reference that ''is'' actually about him is a 53-word blurb, which isn't ''enough'' to get him over GNG all by itself if it's the ''best'' source he can show. So yes, this would probably be keepable if it were referenced better than this — but the role doesn't automatically ''exempt'' him from having to be referenced better than this, because ''no'' political role ''ever'' actually exempts a person from having to be well-referenced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB)