Deletion of Teach fish how to swim

Comment: I agree with the nominator - this falls foul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: Not a great article.  But otable per , and the lack of completeness is not a reason to delete it.  However, we have some history, usage and adaptation to back up the definition, it may not be complete but deleting this at NOTDICT seems to be showing a lack of understanding for the spirit of NOTDICT and . Noted expression and cemented in culture. It is obviously more than a dictionary definition as others have pointed out. It looks to me like a case of , even though I assume 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:WORDISSUBJECT||WP:OVERZEALOUS||WP:AGF)

Comment: per .  As noted above, this seems to be part of a bundle of nominations related to a geographical dispute and seem to have frivolous, irrelevant character contrary to ,  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:POINT||WP:HARASS||WP:DISRUPT)