Deletion of Invasion3042

Comment: what we have here is a fairly new editor and an extreme question of notability.  Would a '''userfy''' be in order if any of the creators want to do the work behind it?  (For the newer editors, see  to understand it.  It's especially important to note that a userfied article is intended to be worked on, it's not a substitute to "get" your article "in" by having it in userspace.)  But it might be a better solution, ''if'' there is a good faith desire to build on the article's notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY)

Comment: There is no evidence of |notability or coverage in secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I'm not sure how being programmed in C# gives this a heavy case of notability.  Actually, I wonder if a heavy case of notability is contagious, because it sure sounds nasty.  Anyway, this site fails  fairly comprehensively.  Sorry guys
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The fact that there exist other articles of questionable notability on Wikipedia '''does not affect''' the notability of this one.  And by the |generally accepted notability standards for Wikipedia (which, by the way, is an encyclopedia, and |is not a social networking tool or a place to seek publicity), there is not a shred of notability evidenced by this article.  If you have significant coverage in |reliable sources, we'll talk.  Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:ISNOT||WP:RS)