Deletion of List of proven conspiracies (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom.  Inherently POV article.  We have to start getting rid of all "opinion" articles on Wikipedia, and just stick to the facts ikipedia is not a  soapbox.  This article can never be anything more than someone's opinion about whether something is or isn't a conspiracy, and then, whether or not it was "proven".  That's ridiculous
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: I believe that the list has been poorly maintained.  I had to go into and make links to the articles, or sections of articles, that the elements in the list referred to.  I believe that the argument "...include any instance..." fails as only |notable instances would be included.  As it stands now, there are approximately 46 entries on the list.  I don't believe that this is a large or unmaintainable number.  I have personally edited and looked at ~30% of the entries, and had to link most of those to their respective articles.  Generally, within the parent articles, the event on the list is undisputed (a.k.a. proven or generally accepted).  There are a few exceptions.  List of proven conspiracies#1865 The Assassination of President Abraham Lincoln|The Lincoln Assassination is currently unsourced.  The Federal Reserve Act is highly disputed in its article (see also Federal Reserve System, esp. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Federal_Reserve_System&diff=prev&oldid=94851367 this diff where it is clearly disputed).  The List of proven conspiracies#1990 Las Vegas American Coin Fixed Video Poker Conspiracy|Video Poker section doesn't reference an article at all, and should be excluded from the list.  Actually, any element of the list that doesn't refer to an existing article should be removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: WP:OR: "''Articles may not contain...any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published arguments, ideas, data, or theories that serves to advance a position.''" Deciding which "conspiracies" have been "proven" (or if they were indeed conspiracies in the first place) is inherently |POV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)