Deletion of Soviet repressions of Polish citizens (1939-1946)

Comment: Absolutely no chance of having this being deleted of course, as most of the people attracted to voting here will wish its content to be retained. Well, it'd be retained anyway, as it already exists in another article, where it is not flagged in the same POV-way. But I guess having it in one place in a semi-neutral manner isn't enough! Another lamb of neutrality sacrificed on the wikipedia altar to the nationalist god of victimhood. Everyone these days wants to be a victim of something; for Eastern Europe more than anywhere perhaps, victimhood is being cultivated on wikipedia by people with no or little direct experience of it claiming it through the constructed medium of national identity, with no regard for ,  or Wikipedia:Content_forking|POV-forking. Most of the eastern European articles of this type promote victimhood or visions of a larger state (e.g. Partitions of Poland articles, Polish minorities in areas that "used to be and ought to be? Polish", etc), and that's not just Polish articles. Sad for me is that I love Poland and Polish history, but all I'll get for this vote is dislike from many Polish users. For what it's worth, I'd be just as against British repressions of Scottish Highlanders or British repressions of the Irish. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SYN)

Comment: I can see nothing wrong with the plan Piotrus has laid out.  It is an extremely notable and important article, and Piotrus has created it in line with .  However, If someone can show me how the current title violates  or , then of course it should be deleted immediately, and Piotrus should be blocked forever
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY||WP:UE||WP:NCGN)

Comment: Subject is obviously notable; there is a pl wiki equivalent; the article is well referenced. As I explained on article's talk it has been created per ; the occupaton article needs to be shortened, and this one expanded even further. The above nom is a sad case of , unfortunately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)