Deletion of Prime Number Distribution Series

Comment: As per nominator, this appears to be |original research, based solely on the author's non-peer-reviewed work.  It has long been argued whether 1 should be categorized as a prime, but 2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  and . In the second reference, one finds the gem, "We question whether the number 2 is really a prime number." The only GS hit for the phrase "Prime Number Distribution Series" http://cscanada.net/index.php/pam/article/viewFile/j.pam.1925252820130601.518/pdf claims to prove the Riemann hypothesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:FRINGE)