Deletion of Ray Jones (Canadian politician)

Comment: without prejudice against recreation if somebody can do better than this. The actual standard for presumed notability of city councillors is global city status, which has been historically presumed to include Calgary (as well as Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa, for a total of six Canadian cities) — but that said, |consensus can change, and I ''can'' see a case for reviewing whether Calgary and Edmonton should actually continue to qualify or not. (We did revisit the question of Winnipeg's historic presumption of notability last year, and consensus ''yanked'' it — so there ''are'' valid grounds for revisiting whether certain cities should retain that status or not.)All of that said, what we need to make an article about a city councillor ''valuable'' is substantive content ''about'' his political career (such as his actual positions on specific issues, specific civic projects he spearheaded or opposed, and on and so forth.) But apart from the repetition of basic election results that are already in the election articles anyway, the only other content present here at all is the non-notable community service awards, and Kelapstick is entirely correct that those ''aren't'' notability claims per se. If the article contained some actual substance about his career in politics, I'd be down with the keep — but all it actually does is list his successive election and reelection statistics, in a way that offers ''nothing'' that a reader can't already get just by following the results tables in the election articles themselves, and there's no point in keeping an article like that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: not an automatic  pass, and doesn't appear to meet GNG, the only independent coverage I find is akin to http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/municipal-election/ray-jones-re-elected-in-ward-5-1.1865337 which is pretty trivial
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)