Deletion of Tjandamurra O'Shane (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per  'If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted'. Are there any sources that refer to him not because of what happened to him in the fire, or directly related to it? Non trivial coverage would support the articles existance in the long run, not just to save an article that may be deleted in the future
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: not a  as per Richard Cavell, RMHED and WWGB hsve said
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: A quick search using some keywords doesn't really show anything this could be merged into, and per  shouldn't be on the encyclopedia. The 'expected result' of the last AfD per the event newswise obviously hasn't happened
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to the event per .  Not sure why so many people (including those who should know better) think BLP1E supports deletion
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or '''Possible Merge''' to an appropriate article on Aborigines. I concur that this is classic  case - there is no indication of any coverage of this individual other than for this one event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Either as an article on the event or on the individual. The extensive coverage over such a period of time persuades me that we should have an article on this and goes beyond a  for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This goes beyond . Aside from the horrific attack, Tjandamurra has a Pat O'Shane|famous aunt and was also given the gift of a world title belt by a Lionel Rose|world champion boxer http://www.eastsideboxing.com/nobbs0701.html
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Having a famous aunt does not assert notability in the smallest way, and being given the belt is because of the burning. This still applies under  in my view with a stretch, but definitely does not pass notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I welcome Jimmy's suggestion that the policy be clarified, but not so that "things like this" can be speedy deleted.  mentions those involved with "a particular relatively unimportant crime" – a pretty wishy-washy statement, and one that I don't think applies here. I don't agree that  applies to an individual known to millions of Australians over ''twelve years'' after the event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: and possibly rename. Even if it did apply, |BLP1E is '''not''' grounds for deletion. It specifically states that we should "cover the event, not the person" if the subject meets other criteria for inclusion. Continuing coverge over more than a decade and events such as the benefit concert clearly demonstrate notability. No policy-based reasons for deletion have been presented or supported
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as Jimmy and Donald rightly identify this is a  case; we should not be hanging millstones round people's necks in this way.  I'd be open to persuasion abut a redirect to an article on racism and aboriginals (apologies if that's not PC, no offence intended), if one exists, that is certainly a valid topic, but this is just tabloid aggregation and we really should be better than that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)