Deletion of List of Chinese words of English origin

Comment: as unsourced contested information (), also because Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and there's no indication of the topic's notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: does not appear to have sources to meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  - when such artciles in the category come up, we usually, but not always, keep them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: per Braincricket and Bearian. Under }, "Lists are generally kept if they are limited in scope, are based upon concrete criteria for inclusion, have verifiable content, and have a logical reason for their construction." The criterion for inclusion could be stated better within the article, but is evident from the title alone. It is limited in scope, and the content is indeed |verifiable; sources do exist that could support it, even though it's in a poor state of development. Expand and reference, don't delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:V)

Comment: According to , "A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources...." Well, ''http://books.google.com/books?id=QWNj5Yj6_CgC&pg=PA347&lpg=PA347&dq=English+loanwords+in+Cantonese&source=bl&ots=0oRXZd05Dw&sig=Ss39kiD28s624BlW8uCeauYAi6g&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lMJ6UOm_MdSy0AGrzYC4Cg&ved=0CDcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=English%20loanwords%20in%20Cantonese&f=false Modern Cantonese Phonology'' spends about 60 pages on it in the chapter "English loanwords in Cantonese". There's also ''http://books.google.com/books?id=y-gXOAAACAAJ&dq=inauthor:%22Wendy+Yeun-wen+Pao%22&source=bl&ots=k9vnuxmHwe&sig=z3FuKXfkfzZ2GZLkXlJy_3yREfE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=DcR6UKjgLsT00gHqu4HgDw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAA A Study of English Loanwords in Chinese Through Chinese Newswriting''. Seems to be a topic that is discussed in books on Chinese etymology and phonology, so I think it qualifies for a stand-alone list. I suggest expansion, rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)