Deletion of Decrepitude

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Decrepitude has a well established dicdef as "weakness; infirmity."  Too weakly sourced to satisfy .The title word does not appear in the online portion of the 3 refs. If it is in some non-viewable portion proponents of the article should cite the page number, to show this is verifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: a fairly obvious |coatrack article pushing a PoV.  The word ''decrepitude'' is not a neologism, or at least is well-formed.  I'd suggest a redirect to obsolescence, which is probably what anyone who linked it or searched it has in mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Either? Both? Does it matter, per ? Someone needs edjamacation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICT)

Comment: seems to be trying to be a Devil's Dictionary|Devil's . Obviously it's a real word and it is not being used as a neologism. This would be like having an article named ''Crap'' and starting out, '''''Crap''' is how many people describe the global economy today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)