Deletion of Controversy and criticism of The X Factor

Comment: as a content fork. Establishing the notability of the main series requires a discussion of both praise and criticism. Isn't this what the main article should be about? Spinning off a pure criticism article is both a  and  weight. A more balanced and proportional way to cover this is in the main article, in context with praise, and in context with the program as a whole
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: There are no Wikipedia reliable sources independent of the Controversy and criticism of The X Factor topic to show that the topic meets . In other words, third parties commenting on the The X Factor television show do not themselves provide source material that is independent of the Controversy and criticism of The X Factor topic, merely because they are independent of the The X Factor topic. The sources for the above AfD nominated topic need to be independent of the Controversy and criticism made about The X Factor to count towards . In other words, you would need newspaper articles, books, magazines articles, etc. that write about those commenting on The X Factor to make this topic meet  to justify a stand alone article. For example, the "BBC News (BBC) 23 November 2005" reference used in the Wikipedia Controversy and criticism of The X Factor article may provide comment on controversy and criticism of The X Factor, but that does not make it independent of the comments they provide. For this topic, you would need another reliable source that writes about the information provided in the BBC News (BBC) 23 November 2005 news article. There is not enough sources indpendent of those commenting on the controversy and criticism of The X Factor to justify a stand alone article under . Accordingly, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)