Deletion of List of Philippine Presidents by longevity

Comment: Consistency and precedent matter. Presidents of the Phillipines are no less important or encyclopedic than leaders of Austria, Canada, Germany, and the United states.  is helpful for understanding why we should not delete articles that would be kept if they involved English-speaking or European countries. Considering that List of Austrian Chancellors by Longevity, List of Austrian Presidents by longevity, List of Canadian Prime Ministers by longevity, List of German Chancellors by longevity, and List of United States Presidents by longevity survived deletion review, this should too. I would also support merging this list with List of Philippine Presidents, but only if someone first makes that list sortable by longevity. -Fagles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: I'm sorry if my 'pointless' comment offends, but this is trivia (IMHO). I can see no usefulness or any point to this organization of the presidents. As far as the US list (and many others), that seems more an example of  or US-centricity of WP than any valid precedent. Read the '''keep''' comments frome the AfD for the US Presidents list; ''Wikipedia should be a place for masses of information'', and ''Very interesting collections all'', and ''I came upon this page out of my own interest and would feel sad to see it go''. Granted I have excerpted the shorter and more succinct !votes, but there are none that make a valid argument. The result of the AfD was '''no consensus''', equivalent to the verdict '''not proven''', in Scottish law. Again in my opinion, ''other stuff exists'', and it too should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)