Deletion of Extreme performance art

Comment: I have very little interest in art, but could tell you what extreme performance art was without having to look at the page. That and the popular press sources I've found make me convinced of its otability. My gut instinct is that its own article is warranted rather than attempting to merge with performance art, though a discussion could be had. If kept it does need to be better integrated into Wikipedia; it is not, for example, featured in the relevant Navboxes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: recall that |notability depends on the existence of sources, not what's in the article. The subject is covered in |reliable sources such as http://www.newsweek.com/some-arts-painful-design-62799 Newsweek at some length. It seems to be quite something https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4wbjMkGGausC&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9&dq=%22Extreme+performance+art%22+-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=VK7NlNFtHL&sig=TlJOx0B3YB6KvYXiXZ4AkAJ3Jm8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi32taDzLDTAhXqKsAKHfo0AvkQ6AEIcjAO#v=onepage&q=%22Extreme%20performance%20art%22%20-wikipedia&f=false in Contemporary China, also covered in http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/kang-yi-performance-artist-hickeys-china_n_2448737.html HuffPost, and http://observers.france24.com/en/20131115-nailed-testicles-russian-protest-art in Russia. Not to everybody's taste but definitely notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)