Deletion of RantMedia

Comment: Just out of curiosity, why are paper-based news articles that are obvious scans of the original and posted on a site (complete with reference of whence it came) not enough for a  reference
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Still needs work ( is still a concern), but since Celticwonder has begun putting proper cites in, and since the sources establishing notability have been put back, it's now worth keeping. Thus I changed my vote
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: I'm not sure if this meets  but it appears to meet  for the collection of entitites they run.  RantRadio by itself likely meets . (nota bene: I am assuming the summaries above are accurate especially those about the articles from the Langley Times , Computer Paper, the Globe and Mail and the Vancouver Sun
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:WEB)