Deletion of Paleness (color)

Comment: the nominator does not propose a valid -REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: You know how pages can have big banners on the top and yet people still ignore them? I saw this article in the same pile of unsourced stuff and dug up some sources on the subject before even noticing there was an AfD. Derp. Anyway, from all the little blurbs I've read, typically 'paleness' is a observation of the result of some kind of effect; 'adding white' 'low saturation', etc. I think that generally qualifies something as a definition. It doesn't seem like there's research into the artistic definition of paleness (as opposed to medical paleness) so building a meaty article would be a challenge. Unfortunately, the term is so broad that I don't see how it could be merged into only ONE of the suggested articles above (and the color theory article is so technical and just unpleasant to read, I wouldn't redirect it there). Because I did put in a efore effort, I'll post the findings on the article's talk page in case someone else wants to examine them for their meritcs. Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)