Deletion of George Lawlor

Comment: County councillor is not a level of office that confers an automatic free pass over NPOL #2 just because the person exists, and his candidacy in a Dail by-election is not grounds for a Wikipedia article either — he would have to ''win'' the by-election to collect notability from the by-election. But the referencing here is a mix of |primary and unreliable sources (e.g. profiles on the self-published and directly affiliated websites of the county council and his political party, podcasts, blogs) that are not support for notability at all; purely routine local coverage of the type that every local councillor everywhere is simply ''expected'' to get in the local media, which is not enough to make him a special case of greater notability than most other county councillors; and glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that are not fundamentally ''about him''. Obviously this will be recreatable after election day if he wins the national by-election, since his basis for notability will have changed, but this is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a local councillor or an as yet unelected by-election candidate already notable enough for an article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: This article was created during his by-election campaign. I'm not sure beyond that what makes him notable. The mere fact of him being referenced in the cited articles is not sufficient. Should every borough and municipal district mayor get an article? Everyone mentioned in local newspapers, if part of coverage of national campaigns? I just deleted a lot of inline references, on the  principle. There seemed to be an element of  given the number of them, some repeated, for a local politician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:OVERCITE||WP:MASK)