Deletion of Portia Antonia Alexis

Comment: Spam, cruft, and then more spam. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I see no signs of  here. The best case for GNG is via two profiles: https://www.thestatesman.com/inspiration-hub/portia-antonia-alexis-forbes-columnist-ace-economic-journalist-1502840458.html in The Statesman (India) and https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/special-features/portia-antonia-alexis-discusses-book-18007556 in Manchester Evening News.  The first profile raises a number of red flags for me, and I doubt its independence.  I'm not sure on the 2nd
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Does not meet  or . I find no coverage that is reliable or isn't churnalism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: There's certainly no , and
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: promotional resume-like article; the subject cannot meet  having https://portiaantoniaalexis.academia.edu/research only ever written two papers (unless those two are ridiculously groundbreaking) and falls short of . As mentioned by Kinu, the ''Manchester Evening News'' article is labeled "advertorial" https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/authors/leena-sidat/ here, while the ''Statesman'' article is from the "SNS Web Desk" and the ''International Business Times'' article is from the "IBT News Desk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per above, by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)