Deletion of William Mahlon Davis

Comment: Meets .  Not the article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Mahlon_Davis&oldid=996124986 it was when nominated for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is not sourced well enough to get him over  — it's far too dependent on primary sources and blogs, with not nearly enough evidence of real media coverage — and claims nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to get over GNG. Just listing a bunch of books as a "bibliography" section separately from the references, without footnoting any of the body content ''to'' those books to provide some concrete ''evidence'' of how ''much'' the books do or don't actually ''say'' about the subject, is not dropping the mic on a notability question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: somewhat regrettably.  I don't see how he meets  nor the general notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: My efore is turning up mostly personal memorial/genealogy websites or wiki mirrors. The only promising thing I found is https://books.google.com/books?id=IzcZAQAAIAAJ&q=William+Mahlon+Davis&dq=William+Mahlon+Davis&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiQjOr62PPuAhUsEVkFHetADCMQ6AEwCHoECAcQAg this, though it seems to lack independence from the subject. Fails GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)