Deletion of Vibroblade

Comment: no distinct criteria for items' inclusion (at least those not called "vibroblade". Star Wars item (and any other universe's identically-named item) seems not to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: J&J would refer to "Johnson & Johnson", and there ''was'' a reference to a real-life vibroblade manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. There was a reference to a webpage on that implement- thus page is ''webpage''. I used the term "fancruft" in the sense of "content that is of importance only to a small population of enthusiastic fans of the subject in question", but if you don't consider that valid, I'm not sure how you can protest the  argument. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: nn concept with a heavy overlay of . I say "weak" only because Google turns up so very many hits for the term. It appears to be an idea common to many sci-fi Role-playing game|RPGs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The J&J "harmonic scalpel" isn't specifically called a "vibroblade" in its page; the article doesn't seem like much more than |original research and |fancruft. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:FANCRUFT)