Deletion of Scottsburg Senior High School

Comment: I have found a total of two sources with minimal effort.  is clearly satisfied.  will also likely be satisfied if I do more searching
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:HEY effort by {{U|Scorpions13256}} and other additions to the history of the school meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Plenty of sourcing to satisfy , as with any other secondary school in the western world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Plenty of sourcing to satisfy , as with any other secondary school in the western world. In this case we have an unreferenced, article. That makes it a stub, with refs it becomes a well written Start. I see three editors who like to delete school articles. One who bases the vote on their inability to instantly find an on line reference. We need to consider paper references. We have another that tries to apply  as if were member of a boyband. We have a third who likes to use a POV stock phrase, with no evidence of where he has researched. Our task is to evaluate whether evidence will exist- not whether we or the editors have found it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MILL)

Comment: I've looked around and found , which isn't a policy in itself, but points to a RfC that determined that {{tq|Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.}} I'll take that as a basis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)