Deletion of Marian devotions

Comment: per  #2.4 "''nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course''".  This article seems a better basis for this notable topic than its putative rival.  In any case, the matter should be resolved by ordinary editing and discussion, not by AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: This is about the article Marian devotions which is a near mirror of Catholic devotions.  Comments should be about the merits of either keeping or deleting this article belong here.  Comments about Blessed Virgin Mary belong on that talk page where editors can still find the points I made that resulted in the new, accurate edit which still stands.  The "dispute" was your objection to the new edit because you |don't allow any changes to that article, and you edit warred over it and made personal attacks.  You put a warning on my talk page and an administrator came along and pointed out edit warring behavior and threatened to block both of us, but your block would have an extra 2 hours for the personal attacks you made.  You've since refactored them after being asked several times to do so by the same admin.  Your efforts to save this article should be about the article, and not about trying to discredit my good faith efforts to remove bad articles from Wikipedia.  Other editors have noted for a long time now that there is a glut of redundant articles about Mary, nearly all obsessively centered on veneration, and all saying the same thing, the same text, linking to the same pages with more of the same text, and almost none of them are accurate or informative.  As a member of the WikiProject Catholicism it's hardly a stretch to know which of these could be deleted for the benefit of the project
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)