Deletion of Citrus (company)

Comment: I added the prod on the basis that, at the time, the article didn't attempt to establish notability. Of the external links now present, two (http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/james_patterson_to_release_crowdwritten_novel.php, http://springwise.com/weekly/2009-02-18.htm) don't mention the company at all, one (http://aimia.i-nex.com.au/i-cms?page=4028) literally only lists its name without any elaboration, and the other (http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/minister-for-information-communications-tech/victorias-best-in-digital-content-shine-at-aimia-awards.html) totals a single sentence. To me that's not enough to indicate |significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. If better sources can be provided I'll certainly reconsider, but the generic nature of the company name makes this one kind of a pain to research in e.g. Google News, and an initial trawl there hasn't given me anything
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Smerdia - fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: strongly, obvious |spam: ''Citrus is an independent interactive agency....'' OK, but what do you '''''do''''' there?  ''Product offering includes web design & development, email programs and web applications....''  Oh
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)