Deletion of Punch and Jewelee

Comment: The ''Watchmen'' comics have been outstanding successful, inspiring numerous editions and dramatisations as a major movie, TV series, &c.  A recent sequel is ''Doomsday Clock'' which continues the tradition of basing its characters on those that first appeared in Charlton Comics, so Rorschach (character)|Rorschach is based on Question (character)|The Question who was in turn based on Mr. A – other characters of Steve Ditko, who seems to be focus of the current spree.  So, the major new Watchmen characters of Marionette and Mime are based on – guess who – Punch and Jewelee.  Now the current version says nothing about this because the bulk of it was written in 2006, long before ''Doomsday Clock'' was written.  But this is all documented in reasonable sources such as ''https://www.cbr.com/doomsday-clock-new-watchmen-characters-charlton-villains/2/ CBR'' and  ''https://screenrant.com/doomsday-clock-watchmen-mime-marionette-powers/ Doomsday Clock's New Villains Change Watchmen Mythology''.  So, there's clearly more to do here and so our policy  applies: "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: zero real world notability, fails , delete as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT)

Comment: There is not  from    that addresses the subject directly and indepth to support a stand alone article. Mentions are not SIGCOV and  is WWIN.  &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:PLOT)

Comment: Two participants have voted keep, so I don't believe that falls within the definition of criteria for  where no one is opposing deletion (a slim majority of participants oppose deletion in some form in fact), and this is no longer a case of minimal participation after two relistings. I thought your rationale for a PROD or nomination of the topic for AfD is to seek for outright deletion in the first place, whereas a merge proposal at the talk page would have been a much more appropriate avenue if you had simply sought for it to be redirected
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:SOFTDELETE)