Deletion of Ball v Johnson

Comment: with the Boris Johnson article, which already has more information on the case than this article contains. It's a . I've added the important update that the legal case was thrown out by the High Court earlier this month (June
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:REDUNDANTFORK)

Comment: This article seems straightforwardly to meet |the general notability guideline 'if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list'. Looking at the |event criteria, 'Events are probably notable if they have enduring historical significance'. As a layman, I'd have thought that this case will have a lasting significance in UK caselaw for its role in determining the scope of Malfeasance in office
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT)