Deletion of List of video games notable for positive reception

Comment: As others have already stated, the basic concept of such a list is notable, but maintaining objectivity and consistency is going to be a serious challenge.  One solution may be to rely upon "best of" lists put together by respected publications such as the http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=0&cId=3139081 Hall of Fame (published in Computer Gaming World) and the http://techland.time.com/2012/11/15/all-time-100-video-games/ All-TIME 100 Video Games (published by TIME (magazine).  At the very least an article based on such lists would solve the problem of editorial subjectivity in determining cut-off points based upon review scores.  Moreover, inclusion on such a list is demonstrative of a more lasting (and notable) positive reception than merely a few good review scores.  However, it admittedly isn't a perfect solution.  For example, some gaming "best of" lists are biased against well received games released only on an obscure gaming platform or games which were released 20 or 30 years ago.  There is also the problem of determining which "best of" lists to use as inclusion criteria and what to do about those games that appear only on one list, but not on others.  Ultimately some degree of editorial subjectivity is inevitable, but what degree is acceptable in this circumstance?  While the concept satisfies , I still have some concerns that developing a list of this nature satisfying  may not be a  challenge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NPOV||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)