Deletion of Zack Shutt (2nd nomination)

Comment: and redirect to Geek Show Podcast. I can find no evidence of significant coverage by |reliable, third party sources as required by the |general notability guideline. Everything sourced is either a trivial mention, not independent or not a reliable source - or a combination. A lot of the content is unsourced - and I think unsourcable - and what is isn't about him but the show with which he is associated. I cannot find any additional sources which would establish the individual's notability (by either the general guideline or the |people specific guideline) or from which |verifiable information could be added to the article. Looking at the content of the article I don't see anything which could be added to Geek Show Podcast or any other article and the article contains unsourced information about a |living person so I don't see the advantage of keeping the history if redirected. I do not find the arguments for keeping convincing. 15,000 downloads (or 19,000 as the source says) isn't even a particularly big number to be arguing for an inclusion standard - many youtube videos and channels have order of magnitudes more viewers without them or their creators being considered notable without significant, independent, |reliable sourcing. Being notable locally and covered only in local sources is not usually a good indicator of notability, school children who do well in their exams can receive local coverage, that doesn't make them notable. Similar articles may exist, but they are not being considered in this discussion, the topic should meet the various inclusion |policies and guidelines on its own merit, it should not be kept purely because other articles exist (as other articles should not be kept/merged/deleted based on the outcome of this discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN||WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:BLP||WP:RS||WP:POLICY)