Deletion of Ix (Dune)

Comment: With a lack significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, I do not think that the fictional planet as an individual subject meets the |general notability guideline. As single third-party source that talks about the real Mu Boötis star system and incidentally mentions the fictional planet is not significant coverage for the fictional planet. There is no reception or significance for the fictional planet as an individual subject in reliable secondary sources, so there is no presumption that it is an appropriate topic for a stand-alone article. Since the article is referenced mostly with |primary sources and using |original research by synthesis, I do not believe that the content justifies being kept, but, in order to generate consensus, a merge is an acceptable alternative to deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SYN)

Comment: It is proportionate to comparable articles in other fictional universes, and is core to understanding that universe. I would expect there to be such an article, so this informs my sense that there ''should be'' such an article, and so it is well that there ''is'' such an article. I happened upon this deletion notice, as I consulted (fully expecting that it would exist as well) Bene Gesserit.  I do not understand the deletionist impulse in this case.  When Sergeant Cribb says, "...it seems that the article is unlikely ever to go beyond  and ", I trust he was conceding that, "this article does not now and is unlikely going forward to violate  and ", which I believe to be the case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)