Deletion of Solidcam

Comment: The only notable thing I could find is that there are ten times more press releases on Solidcam than, uh, "Keep" iVotes in this AfD. The oldest press release was from http://www.thefreelibrary.com/CADTECH+Ltd.+and+data+M+Software+Sign+on+to+Bentley's+MechanicalSpace.-a019866185 October 16, 1997. The topic does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: pure promo-spam. I could not find any significant coverage by |reliable sources to |verify |notability. Does not even come close to meeting  as far as I can see. A couple of the products have received some coverage in industry magazines but it's mostly promotion-type coverage rather than journalistic analysis. Anyway, coverage of the products is irrelevant because the company |doesn't inherit notability from its products and ''this'' article is about the company (but don't go creating pages for the products - I don't think they are notable either). You can put all of those "references" into an ''External Links'' section - they are not invalid, nor are they inaccurate. But they couldn't really be considered "coverage" of the company. http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/business/software-firm-targets-new-growth-1-4900515 This article, for example, would be considered coverage of the company... if it was the same SolidCAM. It's not - it's a different company with the same name. Find some significant coverage in reliable sorces and it will be a different story. Also, have a read of  and you might realise how laughable telling someone else to "do some research" really is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:INHERIT||WP:BURDEN)