Deletion of Coup of 12 June

Comment: Regard to |verifiability you can see Wikipedia works on "'''verifiability''', not truth" also under "Reliable sources" you can see some specifications, then look at this article's references like "'''Guardian'''" and "'''Washington Post'''" and "'''New York Times'''" and "'''NewsWeek'''". It is enough references to say there is a COUP. Also about name ambiguous, there are some suggests in article's talk page that you didn't care about it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Clearly |POV pushing title.  Author should instead add notes to Iranian presidential election, 2009, stating, for example, that The Guardian and Washington Post have called it a 'coup', rather than starting a content fork which inherently endorses that position
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: Iranian presidential election, 2009 as that is the event that the article refers to. Having to separate articles to describe two different s for the same event is a violation of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:NPOV)