Deletion of BlogUpp

Comment: It does not appear that BlogUpp meets the standards of  or . The closest thing to a meaningful writeup is http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-9886107-2.html the one in CNET, but that is from 2008. The CNET item gives a better explanation of what BlogUpp actually does than the current Wikipedia article. As DGG observes, the inclusion of trivial details about the service actually makes the article less plausible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: This page was reviewed and accepted by {{U|Anne Delong}} as part of the |Articles for creation process last April.  I hope she is able to participate in this discussion. Note: Going through a formal review process like AFC in no way exempts pages from being nominated for deletion or being deleted as a result of a deletion discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC)

Comment: Article fails the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). |Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: Fails notability per   and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:PRODUCT)