Deletion of English Electric Canberra (book)

Comment: I don’t see the point of this Afd, the Wikipedia is not some elitist place otherwise many articles would be removed and for Wikipedia:WikiProject Books it’s fine as it meets Wikipedia:BK|Notability. If you read |notability is not inherited, you would see that the exception is Books, Film and Music, these need reviews.This is all about a source of information and the wikipedia is a global project. The important thing for an article is that there are references to back up the information and both these articles have those from good sources. The Lightning book shows that it was a best seller in Grimsby, therefore already being of interest. Just because those in another Wikipedia project are not happy doesn’t mean it is not important to others. What next? The removal of The Berlin Raids (book)? I will be working on this book at some stage and giving it what is required, which is independent third party references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per the nominator's declaration that "these books have received good reviews, from experts in the field," which appears to acknowledge that the GNG is satisfied. Arguing that books on aviation history have no impact beyond the field of aviation history is like arguing that Taylor Swift fails 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)