Deletion of Maharaja Express

Comment: As a named train and with sourcing available, this appears to meet . The promotional mess, such as the obvious promotional wording, the redundant attractions section, the overly detailed itineraries, etc., can be cleaned up; I've started the process of excising and rewording
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As noted by Oakshade, this is a named train which is, as such, very likely notable simply for that fact; a |check of sources shows that the article is clearly about a |notable subject. The article is a promotional mess, that is for sure - but |AfD is not for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:AFD)

Comment: Not only is it a named train, but it easily passes our  guidelines and specifically  with some very in-depth coverage, particularly by the articles from ''Times of India'' about this train.  The nom brings up valid editorial issues that can be resolved with editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:GNG)