Deletion of Atpic

Comment: There really isn't much else to say here (Peridon definitely drove the point home), but...what part of  do you keep OTAVOTE|!voters not understand? '''Erpert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTAVOTE)

Comment: Fails Wikipedia:WEB miserably, Alexa and |google hits are irrelevant. Multiple SPAs !voting seems to indicate some form of |puppetry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS||WP:SOCK)

Comment: If you came here because of an atpic community email or discussion, remember that this discussion is not a vote.  I have been using atpic for years now, and I think it's a great site offering an excellent free service, but I'm not convinced that it's notable.  If you would like to make a case for notability, please see the |notability criteria for websites and demonstrate here that atpic satisfies them.  Also please declare any |conflicts of interest that you might have
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:COI)

Comment: A note to newcomers: '''Whether or not you use the site is irrelevant.''' If you want to save the article, '''get some references''' that comply with  and  and add them to the article (and tell us here. In the meantime, no references means no indication of notability given. As a matter of interest, the French Wikipedia article was deleted earlier this month, and I've removed the transwiki link to the German language Wikipedia, as the article there wasn't about Atpic and had been deleted in 2007 anyway. The Russian transwiki link goes to an article on photosharing with no mention of Atpic, so I've removed that too. Otherwise, per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Atpic is a generic name. There are a lot of things called Atpic. "Atpic ''photosharing''", which is the subject of the AfD, brings up 10 results on Google News, which is more relevant. Also, since you've admitted that you're the creator of Atpic, the |conflict of interest issue remains
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Admittedly, ATPIC references are scarce, which should make it hard to match . However, Google returns close to 30000 direct links to atpic user galleries, which suggests at least that many people know it, use it, presumably point their acquaintances to it. I suggest we appreciate  against that proven 30000 audience
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)