Deletion of Violence against Muslims in India

Comment: By the nominating statement, Anti-Christian violence in India should be deleted because Religious violence in India exists and creating specific sub-articles is pushing a POV and is OR. However, as one might note; Religious violence in India#Anti-Muslim violence and Religious violence in India#Anti-Christian violence both start by linking to a ''main article'' that deals with those subject in greater detail. So, much more likely, these two articles exist because the parent article is already at 146k bytes and doesn't need to be burdened with another 90k bytes from the two child articles. Communal violence in India just redirects to the article on religious violence, so there's that to take into account as well (Amendment notice; Communal riots in India doesn't exist time of amendment: ). Thus, I conclude, that the article's existence is not in itself a result of POV, but, a solution to a problem. Whether or not there is POV within the article is not relevant to deletion and should be handled at the article. On the assertion of : there are currently 89 citations in the nominated article, most of those are citations to scholarly works. Thus, I conclude, that the existence of the article is not in itself a result of original research, but, of the availability of sources. As previous, any OR within the article is not a reason to delete and should be addressed at the article. That leaves us with the actual deletion question; is the topic notable? At the very least, the prevalence of scholarly sources demonstrates notability via the |general notability guidelines particularly that there is; significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. At best you could argue to rename the articles to "Communal violence riots against X in India", but, the term "communal violence riots" might not be accessible (or common) to English speakers in all countries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG)