Deletion of Losebinne

Comment: Not a single source cited in the footnotes would be considered a |reliable source on Wikipedia, and not a single one shows notability anyway. Here's a detailed analysis. '''Note 1''': "360 Encyclopedia": mirror page of that writer's entry on Baidu Encyclopedia (see note 3). '''Note 2''': the writer's entry on the website of her company ("Zuibook", referred to as "Shanghai Most World Culture Development Limited" in the lede). '''Note 3''': Baidu Encyclopedia  (also crowd sourced, and with very lax standards of inclusion). '''Note 4''': the writer's microblog on Douban.com, which Wikipedia presents as "a Chinese SNS website allowing registered users to record information and create content related to film, books, music, and recent events and activities in Chinese cities". '''Note 5''': a thankfully brief collection of platitudes allegedly said by that writer, and presented in the third person ("likes trying all the flavors of milk tea, doesn't care if she will get fat"). '''Note 6''': a reader's assessment of one of the writer's works on book.douban.com (part of Douban). '''Note 7''': Losebinne's blog on Sina.com. '''Notes 8, 10, 12, and 13''': brief entries on her works on Baidu Encyclopedia. '''Notes 9, 11, and 14''': brief entries on the author's work on book.douban.com; no information: just readers' ratings. Summary: a mix of self-published sources, promotional material, and fan content. Not the stuff an encyclopedia is made of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)