Deletion of A House Interrupted

Comment: The reference on CNN appear to be indirect and a one event and the only other sources are not 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Wasn't sure what was meant by "citation" above - If Psychology Today cited it as a source, that would be at least mildly impressive. But this is not in the magazine as far as I can tell, it's just a blog on the site, and it only mentions the book briefly as an aside. That's pretty much the definition of trivial coverage. The other references used for the article are either also trivial coverage, fail  rules, or both. A local listing that an author is doing a signing does nothing for establishing enough notability to be mentioned on Wikipedia, let alone have an article about the book. And there is no notability guideline hat gives anyone who makes an appearance on Dr. Drew or any other similar show worthy of an article here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)