Deletion of Milivi Adams

Comment: You beat me to it Guy. I admit it's possible that this poor girl's death just didn't get much coverage in the Anglosphere... but her name ought to turn ''something'' significant. Lexis Advance turns zero hits for "Milivi Adams".  suggests no: Googling https://www.google.com/#q=%22Milivi+Adams%22&start=130 "Milivi Adams" gives 126 hits, and that includes Wikipedia mirrors and related projects. It's possible there's something hiding in there, but I doubt it. Even so, I paged through Google's search results for the term. There aren't even all that many non-English sources (and the English ones are universally bogus, unreliable, and/or trivial mentions). Nah. This isn't even plausible as a redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:SET)

Comment: Keep'''. I've added four references to independent sources, making a total of five. I believe that this qualifies under the |notability (people) guidelines per "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". Please see comment below
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: or possibly merge. Even though there are references available, the subject of the article is notable not for her life and death but for the way her death is being used by others. At most, this is a  situation, and so a separate article on her life and death is not warranted. The material in the article would be better added to United States Navy in Vieques, Puerto Rico#Protester History|this article on the US navy in Vieques somewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)