Deletion of The Terror Conspiracy

Comment: I searched http://www.google.com/search?q=Terror+Conspiracy,+marrs&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=110&sa=N Terror Conspiracy + Marrs on Google, looked through the results (12 pages) to the end where I reached "repeat the search with the omitted results included".  In all these, the only reliable source was brief mention in a http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/03/INGR0KRCBA1.DTL San Francisco Chronicle article on 9/11 conspiracy theories.  That's not enough notability or  to build an article upon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I hate stupid 9/11 conspiracy theories, but  doesn't not apply to the contents (nor the book itself). Just try searching for it. The author seems to be a well known conspiracy theory writer, thus this book would pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BK)

Comment: Non-notable and fails  as it cannot be verified in any way/shape/form from independent sources. Hence the name conspiracy ''theory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: Amazon sales rank of 4,070 is quite high. http://www.amazon.com/Terror-Conspiracy-Deception-Loss-Liberty/dp/1932857435/sr=8-1/qid=1160537854/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-7718831-9342363?ie=UTF8.  Appears to satisfy , since the author, Jim Marrs, meets Wikipedia's criterea for notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)