Deletion of Matti Jutila

Comment: as passes  due to citations and membership of Finnish Academy, as others have already discussed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: I don't think the "visualizations count" matters due to 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOBODYREADSIT)

Comment: at present. With close to 1000 cites on Google scholar (with many single author papers) comes close to passing rof#C1 for a pure mathematician. Would the nominator like to comment on the scholar scores
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Passes #C3, and the #C1|C1 case looks decent as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: I think the discussion about citations above may be confused, in two ways: first, there is someone else with the same name at the same university whose citations match the citation counts given https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Hkzqv6YAAAAJ but I don't think it's for the same person; the other particulars like discipline and academic rank don't match in any way. And second, you can't use citations to compare people in different disciplines with very different citation practices, like Mello and Hirata; that would be like saying basketball is better than formula 1 racing because they score more points per game. (Also see .) Anyway, my keep is based not so much on citations and #C1 (although for pure mathematics Jutila's citation counts are pretty good, I think good enough to pass: 201 for his monograph ''Lectures on a Method in the Theory of Exponential Sums'', 131 for "On the Mean Value of L (1/2, χ) FW Real Characters", 103 for "On Linnik's constant", 74 for "Riemann's zeta-function and the divisor problem", 69 for "Primes in short intervals", etc), but on his membership in the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters and #C3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:PROF)