Deletion of Stella Nova

Comment: Article topic lacks |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources. (|?) It had no meaningful hits in Google Books and News searches despite being a contemporaneous org associated with the English language. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{tl|ping}} me. re: soft deletion above, started a discussion Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion#Are articles restored after speedy deletion eligible for PROD%3F|at WP:PROD but it wouldn't be eligible either way because the subject had a prior AfD (albeit under a former name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42)

Comment: While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it was {{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode:Stella Nova}}}} previously undeleted (May 15, 2007
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)