Deletion of Monastyr

Comment: The article has no references to speak of, but can we find any? Of course, this is a niche game and any refs would be in Polish; the nominator would be well advised to consider this little fact (and at least ask for help on WT:POLAND). Well, pl wiki links a lot of articles about the game on http://polter.pl/monastyr/ (popular Polish game portal, :pl:Poltergeist (polter.pl)). Are those sufficient, hmmm. Interesting issue - would articles about Warhammer or such published in White Dwarf be sufficient for notability if no other coverage existed? (At least polter.pl is independent of Monastyr publisher, I think). Well, I'd think an article about let's say 'how to make a dwarf character in Monastyr' may not be good enough, but reviews would suffice to establish a game system notability (analogical to video games). Here are some reviews of the game: http://polter.pl/rpg/Monastyr-c479 (polter.pl), http://paradoks.net.pl/read/8922 (lesser known Polish gaming portal), http://www.gildiarpg.pl/monastyr-hardcover (another Polish gaming portal, :pl:Gildia.pl), https://www.gry-online.pl/S018.asp?ID=1397&STR=5 (yet one more, :pl:Gry-Online). I stop here - at least three of them are on well known (in Poland) major gaming/culture/geek sites (Polish equivalents to English sites like Kotaku, etc.) This seems sufficient to establish notability (PS. There are also reviwws of Monastyr modules/expansions, etc. like https://esensja.pl/gry/recenzje/tekst.html?id=9111 in :pl:Esensja...). PPS. While , this RPG system is much more notable then most List of Dungeons & Dragons modules|individual D&D modules... but the sources are in Polish. Be careful with such nominations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)