Deletion of Buck Naked (2nd nomination)

Comment: sourced content to Barenaked Ladies. Not independently notable as far as I can tell - the sources in the article don't seem to provide significant coverage and all I could find was http://jam.canoe.ca/Music/Pop_Encyclopedia/B/Barenaked_Ladies.html this and http://www.macombdaily.com/articles/2008/12/27/entertainment/srv0000004336072.txt this, which are no better. But assuming it can be verified, there's no reason why this shouldn't be mentioned in the band's article per , and it seems to be fairly important in their history. The title is a plausible enough search term so a redirect would be good too
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NNC)

Comment: I don't know a ton about Wikipedia policy versus essays, but I notice that the page linked to twice above at  specifically says at the top that it's just an essay that "contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors on Wikipedia:Deletion policy" and it's not actually Wikipedia policy. So how does citing the information on an essay work when they're opinion, not policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: as per  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)