Deletion of 2007 World Cup Matches

Comment: I consider it is duplication of primary source information, and horribly formatted, not up-to-date and hard-to-read duplication at that.  #REPOSITORY states: ''other source material that are only useful when presented with their original, un-modified wording.''  As a cricket fan, a scorecard is useful, but only in the normally formatted way, which other sites do much better than wiki does. Maybe it belongs in Wikisource, if at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: For all the reasons stated previously: It does not violate any of the  policies (#INDISCRIMINATE and #DIRECTORY are not applicable - check the criteria properly), and in fact is exactly the kind of data that would be found in a traditional encyclopaedia (thus "not encyclopaedic" is not a valid argument against inclusion either). User 72.27.8.49's comment re: the FIFA World Cup entries being allowed to stand is valid - either all must stay or all must go. Proponents of deletion clearly can't even agree on whether producing a scorecard is primary source material, whether it is duplication of a source, or whether it requires attribution to, or validation from, a source! In view of their contradictory comments - obviously based purely on each person's personal interpretation of the WP guidelines - the scorecards pages for sports events should stay until and unless specific clarification is made 'officially' by WP. However I totally agree that this page ''must'' be renamed to include the word 'cricket', since there are world cup championships in several sports. I believe '''2007 Cricket World Cup Matches''' would be the most sensible title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: since #PAPER is the only reason for deletion that I see mentioned thus far
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: while this isn't a paper encyclopaedia, I do question the usefulness of this, particularly with very decent external links providing identical information and, as such, being |reliable sources for such events
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)