Deletion of Alex Ozols

Comment: this blatantly |promotional, possibly |advertising text, per nomination, as lacking |verifiable |evidence of |notability. And  the argument  |"There's other similar stuff on Wikipedia" is null and void. It simply means more work for us
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:OSE)

Comment: Every television market in America has a lawyer that saturates the airwaves with ads and will provide comment about law issues to any station if needed. This looks like San Diego's version of Cellino & Barnes; sources, indeed, but media saturation doesn't equal meeting . We've also got  issues here with 'lawyer helps litigant get case dismissed' cases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RESUME)

Comment: As a student from San Diego trying to get into wikipedia I thought I would start with some additions to a lawyer here in San Diego that everyone knows. I have never met Alex Ozols but I have heard about him and see him very frequently on local TV. I made some additions today and then saw that this page is now up for deletion. I looked at  and  and it seems that this would not fail either or those. When looking at the footnotes it says "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability". This is an individual that has not just posted their own biography but instead has been notated in the media about cases that they personally handled. They are not cases that Alex Ozols commented on but instead are cases that he was the one handling which means the story is about his representation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO)