Deletion of Wilt L. Idema

Comment: Nom has not answered my question after the 24 hour sleep cycle about LP's citation record. I will answer myself: the cites are excellent for a low cited field and pass rof#1. In addition to the library holdings the festschrift shows clearly that the LP is a major authority in the field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: To add to the above, his books are widely held by institutions (satisfying  c1). for example: http://www.worldcat.org/title/guide-to-chinese-literature/oclc/35397874&referer=brief_results 667, http://www.worldcat.org/title/personal-salvation-and-filial-piety-two-precious-scroll-narratives-of-guanyin-and-her-acolytes/oclc/257553051&referer=brief_results 946, http://www.worldcat.org/title/red-brush-writing-women-of-imperial-china/oclc/56355920&referer=brief_results 349, http://www.worldcat.org/title/judge-bao-and-the-rule-of-law-eight-ballad-stories-from-the-period-1250-1450/oclc/681549381&referer=brief_results 613, http://www.worldcat.org/title/trauma-and-transcendence-in-early-qing-literature/oclc/58828541&referer=brief_results 207, etc. Might be appropriate for nom to withdraw this in the face of such conclusive evidence. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Membership in KNAW is enough for #C3 and for me, even if he hadn't also passed all those other criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)