Deletion of Algeria at the 1967 Mediterranean Games

Comment: First of all, it's impossible to have a sensible discussion about this many articles.  Secondly, these are obviously notable.  The newspapers of each participating country obviously cover their participation in these games, so there have to be sources in the world.  If someone wants to add them to the articles they will, but as per  only their existence need be established for notability to follow necessarily. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN)

Comment: the main argument in this AfD is the lack of sources in the existing articles. While this is certainly a problem, Sillyfolkboy has shown pretty clearly that this is in large part just a result of no good-faith attempt to find some.  addresses whether or not something is verifi'''able''', not verifi'''ed'''. Outside of BLP issues, non-contentious articles being poorly sourced is not criteria for deletion, it's criteria for improvement. While some of the proposed changes to "minimise" such content so that it would be viable to have on a single article spanning many years may work for countries like Andorra, it would range from unwieldy to downright disastrous as the generalised default as is being proposed here. While I can see a case that the smaller articles might in theory make more sense at a single aggregated location, I believe that this is a case of preference rather than one of notability, and in my mind the advantages of consistency in each delegation's articles being named and formatted similarly far outweighs any advantages that case-by-case merges can give
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)