Deletion of Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation

Comment: Meets  criteria. Is by a notable publisher Threshold Editions (part of Simon & Schuster. Has received press coverage http://voices.washingtonpost.com/political-bookworm/2010/04/awakening_the_obama_zombies.html Washinton Post, http://www.booktv.org/Program/11424/Obama+Zombies+How+the+Liberal+Machine+Brainwashed+My+Generation.aspx C-Span both positive and negative. Appears to be new, but the author is a known cable news pundit
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NB)

Comment: sources given are blogs, newsmax (hah!), and similarly |unreliable sources.  We have people here casting keep votes because they think certain things ''should'' be in  but actually are not, so these opinions should be discarded in the final analysis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BK)

Comment: did not realize that FOXNews - Forbes - Seattle Post Intelligencer were Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|unreliable sources and logs as sources|just blogs.  It seems the first three covered the book, as shown here http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Obama+Zombies%3A+How+the+Liberal+Machine+Brainwashed+My+Generation%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: since the current notability guidelines for books doesnt include anything about bestseller status, we have to invoke  in this case. Is this what the Keep votes are really saying? i find it odd that music albums are listed on WP based often exclusively on their Billboard status (if even that), but books are put through this procrustean nightmare to show notability. Im not a fan of this book, but i feel strongly that a NYT bestseller, that can sustain for say, at least 3 weeks, should automatically have a stub, unless its a trivial book (a cat christmas cookbook
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNORE)