Deletion of Mario Rabinowitz

Comment: article shows no evidence of subject meeting . It doesn't matter how much one has written, only what is published about one in reliable independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This is an interesting case. If you consider the patents, the subject has an h-index of 17 on GS. I would argue that the subject almost meets  criterion #7 (substantial impact outside academia in academic capacity). The problem is that he is not an academic, strictly speaking, even though his involvement with the IEEE Trans. is typical of an academic. One could also make a case for meeting  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed), as many of the patent citations are from researchers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: At the moment I don't see any evidence that he meets  or . A lot of papers, but none with >50 citations according to Google Scholar.  One self-published book, which has got a little coveragehttp://www.columbian.com/news/2011/dec/23/portrait-of-local-artist-as-a-young-woman/?print but not enough for notability requirements.  Adjunct professor. Lack of discussion in 3rd-party sources, with most web hits being articles/papers by him. It can be hard to tell if someone's made a major contribution to a small field of study, which might make them meet notability requirements, and I've no specific knowledge of his field, but more proof is required
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR||WP:WRITER)