Deletion of Rodney Pocceschi

Comment: with respect.  a memorial. To say "any police officer killed in duty is notable" makes most rabid deletionists look decidedly moderate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: A lot of you need to change perspective and get a bit more creative, I'm sure there are a lot of notable ''incidents'' involving fallen officers - if something gets widely reported then put together a page called "Rodney P murder" and tie in info about the killer, the death, news reports and such biographical info about the victim as is appropriate. But don't slam others for following the rules, it's clear this officer does not neet . If the memorial clause was relaxed then slain officers might well be among the first to deserve articles, but a hell of a lot of people die for a hell of a lot of reasons and I for one don't want to see WP turn into an online book of remembrance. I'll be the first to change my vote if somebody changes this page into an article covering all the aspects of a newsworthy event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: http://www.google.com/search?q=Rodney+Pocceschi&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=100&sa=N Rodney Pocceschi receives 172 unique Ghits. I added the only working http://news.google.com/news?q=Rodney%20Pocceschi&num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&tab=wn GNews link to the article. Even the info I've added, and the memorial sites I've perused, have not convinced me that this subjects death, while needless & tragic, merits an encyclopedia article as per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)