Deletion of Fiona Lazareff (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:BLP1E very obviously does not apply in this case as there are clearly two events (the litigant-in-person advocacy in late 2018, the missing persons advocacy in early 2017) separated by more than a year. These are not interviews but coverage of her campaigns. Obviously a pass for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Dismissing reliable independent sources such as ''The Times'' and ''Legal Futures'' {{u|FOARP}} highlighted in a recent AfD solely on the basis of "interview" is short-sighted.  The person named is the subject of two extensive articles in the newspaper of record for the United Kingdom and that alone is enough to qualify under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . She seems to have only gotten coverage over a brief one-week period when she called for courts to be made easier to access. Given that both sources are mostly interviews, I am not sure whether they provide significant coverage in any case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)