Deletion of Race to the Right

Comment: lots of noise but still no |reliable sources. Add some and we'll talk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom. Yes, as difficult as this may be to understand, basic Wikipedia policies apply to this show as well, and there are still no  in the article as of right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I just wanted to point out that (a) my intention for authoring this page has been clear throughout the discussions on this and the related afd: to enhance Wikipedia's comprehensiveness of public figures, etc. and (b) , which I think is applicable on this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: I can't comment on CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc. as I don't work for any of those companies. They have their own views on blogging... and besides, they are news media.  Wikipedia is not, it is an encyclopedia.  Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Self-published sources as secondary sources guideline is pretty clear when it states "...personal websites, blogs, and other self-published or vanity publications should not be used as secondary sources."  They simply are not a reliable source.  blogs might be on the bleeding edge of information dissemination, but Wikipedia is a reactive media, not a proactive media.  It is an encyclopedia, not a news site; the purpose is not to "disseminate news".  If a blog is the primary or only source for information, it can't be seen as a |reliable source.  If a blog is simply reprinting what has been said elsewhere, then Wikipedia should be using the source feeding the blog (provided it is a reliable source of course) and not the blog.  Blogs generally have huge verifiability & POV  problems
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)