Deletion of Robert Bradtke

Comment: I don't see anything covering him specifically per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No'' notability claim, no matter how important it may sound, ''ever'' exempts a person from having to have ''media'' coverage to ''support'' an article with. We're not looking for passing mentions of his existence; we're looking for coverage which is ''substantively about him'', written by ''real journalists'' and not just press releases from the affiliated governments — even an actual ''president'' of the United States would not get a Wikipedia article if he somehow managed to hold the role without actually getting over  on his media coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: My vote of keep is a vote for for Jury nullification of  - standing consensus can overrule as it does with  notability.  An Ambassador belongs in any encyclopedia. Most of the other Ambassadors of the United States to Croatia are on WP as Dream Focus pointed out (and they should be). :Category:Ambassadors of the United States to Croatia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:NFOOTY||WP:NOTPAPER)