Deletion of Nigma Talib

Comment: If she was featured and interviewed in so many reliable sources like https://www.google.co.in/search?q=nigma+talib&aq=f&oq=nigma+talib&aqs=chrome.0.57.3970j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#tbm=nws&q=nigma+talib+telegraph 1,, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3299440/What-wine-doing-face-bad-diet-habits-wreak-havoc-complexion-revealed-fascinating-book.html 2, New York Observer, called by BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p035d8qd 4 and there are quite a few reliable sources. She is meeting |GNG, It is certainly unexpected to see so many votes against without looking into the details. I might agree to a point about the rational for naturopathy, but She is quoted in various other news sources, asked for her opinions as an expert in her field. My vote is definitely keep for her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: references are promotional and the content is . ''The gruesome
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Meeting  isn't a guarantee of being eligible for an article, it's a minimum requirement. And it also takes a pretty generous interpretation of the GNG to say Talib passes. I see no evidence of noteworthy accomplishments, achievements, or real claims to fame, other than the ability to get media outlets to quote her advice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Does not meet |GNG nor ; subject has coverage in tabloid media (newspapers) and health magazines, which are not reliable sources and perhaps not fully independent of the subject. Some of those articles were the result of a PR campaign paid by the subject. Most of those articles seem like they are part of a press junket and contain adverts for her naturopathic and spa services with prices. It would be different if she has received a major award for her contributions to society in a meaningful way. Subject has done nothing notable other than run popular alternative health clinics in NY and London, publish a book on "anti-ageing", and market herself to the Daily Telegraph and other celebrity-focused magazines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: Many of the sources which mention her do not cover her 'in depth' as required by the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)