Deletion of 2010 Shanghai fire

Comment: Its rare that I disagree with WP:NOTNEWS Arguments, but it meets the criteria of  in my book. I also have a strong feeling that had this been a 28 floor building in downtown Chicago, New York City or LA We would not being having this discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEWSEVENT)

Comment: per above. It is very rare that a fire results in this much damage and so many deaths; it is also prompting Chinese authorities to implement stricter fire safety regulations. This is a significant event, much more than |NOTNEWS-level, and has received enough coverage to justify an article. It is not fair to say this fire will be forgotten in a few months because, well, it has not yet been a few months
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Major disaster. Compare this item with the minor news item being debated at rticles for deletion/Datalink Computer Services incident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: It has the references, and therefore appears to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Only one question needs to be asked - would this be deleted if it had happened in America?  Oh look, there's a flying pig. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)