Deletion of Jedward

Comment: I don't watch X-Factor but have read several news articles about Jedward who seem to have greater notability than the show.  There are hundreds of independent, reliable sources which cover them at length and so they easily pass our |notability guideline.  This article - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/the-jedward-industry-1825551.html The Jedward industry from the respected ''Independent'' gives a good summary of the matter and well demonstrates why this article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It is the show, the show creator's ability to keep it in the press, and the public unexpectedly voting for the act, which is notable - not the act itself (which is generally regarded as somewhat unremarkable). The act itself is almost a bystander in the whole event - and is certainly no more remarkable than any other of the acts. In addition, no matter how much coverage the performances by this act gain, there is still |no independent notability - it is all related to the X Factor. Of course, this act may well go on to attain indpendent notability but it has not done so yet and we cannot assume it will. The inclusion of a bio with all the other act bios is right and appropriate, and a redirect to that page useful for navigation and search
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)