Deletion of Bride Has Massive Hair Wig Out

Comment: For the people who said merge, please state where you want to merge. For the people who want to delete, think first of , which is Wikipedia policy. This viral video clearly meets  as IronGargoyle stated. The article is well-sourced, with many references to newspapers (not tabloids and such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: close debate and '''block nominator'''. A clear example of a bad-faith nomination, judging by the nominator's obvious unfamiliarity with  and implied unwillingness to bother learning. I have nominated many articles for deletion ... I wouldn't have created this one to begin with if I wasn't incredibly familiar with , and the meaning of "multiple non-trivial news coverage." I included references to |reliable sources ''for precisely that reason''.That some people seem to be embarrassed that this made the Main Page shows that we need better deletionists than what we've been getting lately. As recently as six months ago this nomination would have been laughed off AfD.As for merging it, ''no''. Unless you want to merge ''everything else'' in this vein, like Ellen Feiss, Bus Uncle, and even lonelygirl15 back into List of Internet phenomena, which is long enough as it is. I found enough out there doing research to justify a stand-alone article and created it. It passed newpage patrol, which is where most of the real cruft gets deleted (believe me, I know). I'm really dismayed (can you tell?) that I have to go here and take the time to restate what should be obvious to anyone who knows policy reasonably well. The merge arguments are good-faith; the deletion ones are not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS)

Comment: Well-written, well-referenced article that seems to pass  quite clearly. Multiple non-trivial mentions, and it got parodied on the tonight show? |Wikipedia is not paper people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT)