Deletion of Rigamajig

Comment: non-notable, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: To be fair, there are a few references which show that this "educational toy" is being used in certain places. But I haven't found the indepth sources required for keeping the article. Stuff like toys actually take a long time to become notable - this usually happens when some scholarly works reference the toy. This seems like a  to me at this moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: on reflection, i should have said "probably notable", i would have been happy with this being redirected with a sentence or two to an appropriate article like 'Large construction toys', unfortunately there isn't one, i agree with {{u|John from Idegon}}, that some of the sources can be seen as |promotional, so may not be useable. Although this looks like a great educational product, it does not quite meet , and so should be '''Delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTION||WP:GNG)