Deletion of Denis Rancourt

Comment: The news sources listed above appear sufficient, taken together, to satisfy . He also appears to be considered an expert on environmental issues, per: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=de6a54bf-802a-23ad-45ed-60ae6f3febe2 Additionally, I believe his physics work might well meet . A Google Scholar searchhttp://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?num=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=%22DG+Rancourt%22&btnG=Search finds one paper on which he is first author with 164 citations, & many others with respectable citations. His physics research could do with being mentioned in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: It looks like he is a darling of the tabloid rags, but though the article give |undue weight to his activism work.  Overall, what I found at Google News suggests notability, though some of the articles are in French and Spanish
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: A Google Scholar search, after removal of false positives, does not yield enough citations for him to pass . On the other hand, the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?tab=sn&num=10&as_allsubj=all&hl=en&ned=us&q=%22Denis+Rancourt%22 independent news coverage of his anarchist activism does seem to indicate enough notability under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)