Deletion of Crimes involving radioactive substances

Comment: While an interesting collection of reports I think  and  say not to create articles based on an intersection such as "crime" and "radioactivity."  I don't think we would have an article on "Crimes involving gasoline."  Also the article, to me anyway, seems to have a  feel. As if its purpose is to warn us of the dangers of criminals getting hold of radioactive substances.  A worthy purpose, but not what an encyclopedia is supposed to be doing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: It's true that I had misremembered what  says.  You're right, there's no clear conclusion the article seems to be advancing.  Nevertheless it seems to be somewhat of a novel ''topic of study'', which WP also should not be discovering; it's not within our function.  As for it being a "glorified list", the trigger for my filing this AfD was when someone moved it from a title containing ''list'' on the grounds that it was not one.  If it were rewritten as a true list, that would alleviate some of my concerns to some extent, but not the one about it being a libel trap
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per Johnfors and  - it's getting better and is clearly notable, based on a cursory look at the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: I should say that  doesn't say exactly what I was thinking &mdash; I'm not saying that the article necessarily "advances a position" via a novel synthesis (though I'm also not saying it doesn't; it's a point that needs to be watched out for if Catavar's plan is followed).  The point is more that it considers together things that I am not sure are considered together in reliable sources; that it's a novel invention of a topic of study or discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)