Deletion of World domination in the future

Comment: I'm not a fan of applying  indiscriminately, but this a case where citations are used ''solely'' to verify real and fictional events in order to produce an (incoherent) original essay. It's one of those examples where individual paragraphs make sense and are sourced, but the whole article is a rambling hoo-ha. The main problem is that the article has an extremely vague topic. You can dump tons of science fiction books, movies and video games in it. Like that were bad not enough, the article mixes references to fiction with references to some real world events, e.g. citing facts about the Chinese economy. It's not even clear if the article takes itself seriously and is trying to be a , or if it attempts to be a list of scenarios from fiction. I think it should be removed for failing , i.e. it is an overinclusive list of "world domination scenarios", some purely fictional and some that constitute |original research attempts to produce a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:CBALL||WP:SALAT||WP:OR||WP:CBALL)

Comment: The subject does not exist as a coherent topic, and is not suitable for a separate article. The information given here seems to have been fairly artificially extracted from sources dealing with other subjects and fairly artificially assembled here. Also an strong element of  (specifically 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN)