Deletion of Lauren Southern

Comment: per Bearcat. This is a case of . There are some reliable sources to point towards notability, but not enough. Right now the piss-throwing incident is the only thing that has gotten RS coverage, but that would fall under . In a few years there's a good chance that she'll qualify, but the coverage isn't there yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and lack of sufficient reliable sources to establish notability. The section "Activities" reads like a tabloid; she's not yet done anything significant to warrant an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per nom, , , , and . The subject is a 21 year old college student at a small and obscure "college" who writes a blog for a small media company north of the United States border. Provincial and run of the mill doesn't begin to describe her. ''Bad things happen'' to her and people around her when she violates good manners and others' personal body space. So what? She received a little over 500 votes in her only election, about one percent of the total, and about 400 votes more than I had in my last election. Again, so what? The |sourcing truly, utterly stinks like a dead moose. A tweet of hers was once quoted by the ''Washington Post''. So what? It's so good to be reminded that White privilege is not restricted to the middle class, males, straight females, or ugly Americans. For good effect, '''salt''' this one, please, closing admin; "you are our only hope
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:SOAP||WP:NOTWEBHOST||WP:MILL||WP:RS)

Comment: Nothing here is a strong claim of |notability under Wikipedia's inclusion standards for her areas of activity, the sourcing is parked almost entirely on |primary sources rather than |reliable ones, and the few sources that ''do'' count as reliable ones are still disqualified because either (a) she's the ''author'' of the content, and thus it's still a primary source, or (b) it's not covering her in a ''context'' that confers notability ("banned from a Facebook group", for instance, is not a reason why a person gets an encyclopedia article.) She might accrue more genuine notability in the future, but nothing written or sourced here ''now'' is enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)