Deletion of Farhad Hakimzadeh

Comment: and focus the article on the crime. Clearly there is a will to preserve the information about the crime itself, and whilst I'm not convinced the crime passes notability, the debate here has been about whether there should be an article about the person. As the person is solely notable in connection with this theft, it's a clear . If anyone questions whether the crime is notable, that's better discussed in a fresh AfD without the notability of the person muddying the issue
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: WP:BLP1E, if he never committed this crime is he notable for anything else? no.  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: as per ; the subject has received significant press coverage. Besides, were not talking about "minor crimes" here, and the article shows that the subject is famous for more than one event. Any bias toward the subject or lack of content can be tagged and improved. Wikipedia is a work in progress, right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: clearly . Everyone upgrades security after a theft in your home, office etc, that's routine. Special:Contributions/210.56.72.185|210.56.72.185
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: clear , and a recent (and far smaller) flurry of coverage centring around his eventual conviction for that self-same 1 event does not alter the fact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)