Deletion of Luther Welsh

Comment: I think he passes notability criteria in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Not even close to  and, as for , we have a little press about his discovery of a Mersenne prime but almost nothing else. I searched hard for sources a week ago (before I did, the article had basically the same content but was totally unsourced) and could find almost nothing about him to add to the article. As discussed above, I think this falls under 1E: his discovery of the prime is a notable event that is already covered under Mersenne prime, his work with GIMPS does not really add notability to the article, and I've already included the only other interesting and verifiable factoid (his coinage of the GIMPS name) to the GIMPS article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: If that were it, to me, it would be a clear case of . What I'm less sure of is whether his role in GIMPS is enough to elevate him about that "known only for one thing" standard
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I was thinking of suggesting a merge to Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search, but the merge-worthy info is already there. His name does not seem a likely search term so I see little point in a redirect; this is the only thing he's known for, and if you're into Mersenne primes, the link from there to GIMPS is already prominent. '''Procedural Comment''': the relisting suggests Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|WikiProject Deletion sorting is in need of more members, or deletion sorting needs to be encouraged or made more prominent on the  page. If this had been listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators|WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators or Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science initially I doubt it would have needed relisting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)