Deletion of Chronology of Star Wars (3rd nomination)

Comment: whatever the original nominator's intentions were for nominating, editors believe in good faith that this article fundamentally fails Wikipedia policies including  and . Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy and "a procedural error made in a proposal or request is not grounds for rejecting that proposal or request
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: this massive plot dump (#PLOT), although I wouldn't mind seeing (parts of) the #Behind the scenes section appearing in Star Wars, Star Wars Expanded Universe or Star Wars canon per Postdlf ''as long as it is sourced'' (through dialog), which currently it isn't. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This chronology is a |plot-only description of a fictional work and does not seem to meet the |general notability guideline as an individual subject. The article relies on primary and tertiary sources, but no secondary sources that make analytic or evaluative claims about the chronology and which for notability purposes are the ones that provide the most objective evidence of notability. The timeline itself is a non-concise plot summary of the various works presented in a non-encyclopedic format, using the fictional timeline rather than real chronology as a framework, so it is a redundant |content fork. The article relies on |original research by synthesis to generate the content, such as the estimated dates before the ''Battle of Yavin''. Only the ''film timeline'' holds some value and that can easily be integrated in Star Wars or in Star Wars canon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:GNG||WP:CFORK||WP:SYN)