Deletion of Daniel Murphy (computer scientist)

Comment: I've added another couple references by third parties.  While these contain short mentions of his work rather than lengthy biographies, all three independent references now in the article are together, IMHO, sufficient to establish notability per .  Besides this, he likely meets criteria 1 and/or 7 of , as evidenced by his edited and presumably invited contribution to Dave Walden's "Anecdotes" column in ''IEEE Annals of the History of Computing'' and the many hundreds of citations in scholarly literature to his technical papers on TENEX.  (Unfortunately, citation indexes such as Scopus and Google Scholar either don't maintain dedicated author profiles for him, or else list only a subset of his publications, though by searching for his papers by title and making note of the citation counts, it's possible to verify my claim
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: I did not seem him mentioned in any books on the history of computing, or in any other books at all. I searched his name with each of the software packages mentioned in the article and found no  at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Despite the assertions above, there is still no . All the arguments are simple variations of , with no sources to assert this. If he is important in the history of computer sciences, we need sources saying that and showing his life and achievements have been subject to more than a passing sentence here and there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:ITSIMPORTANT)