Deletion of El Goonish Shive

Comment: meets prerequisites for & 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:WEB)

Comment: Notable per  and , most conventionally in the clear case of the Edutopia and "History of Webcomics" references. Yet another notable webcomic nominated for deletion in bad faith or ignorance by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WEB)

Comment: Published by Keenspot as per . If Keenspot does not count as an independent publisher, what does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: As previous comments note, this article fulfills the third requirement of  due to being published via Keenspot both online and in print.  The article could use reworking to better fit the format, but that is not a vaild argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Just agreeing with the article meeting  and . Although in the long run, outside sources wouldn't hurt the article any and would help its case, but AfD is not a tool to say "clean up the article". El Goonish Shive still meets notability through how it was published
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:WEB)

Comment: no sources with which to write anything even remotely resembling a decent, encyclopedic article (). References in places like http://www.edutopia.org/magazine/ed1article.php?id=Art_1605&issue=sep_06 this are nice but don't provide anything even remotely resembling relevant information. If it's not too much trouble; what, exactly, does ''The History of Webcomics'' say about EGS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)