Deletion of List of people on the cover of I-D magazine

Comment: The nominator has misunderstood . First, it does not require citations within an article. The policy is that all information must be verifi''able''. So the fact that information does not yet have citations does not mean it is OR. It is only OR if it's not possible to have citations for it. Second, where we have magazine issue dates, that ''is'' a citation (and a source is reliable for its own content), unless it's argued that the cover model is somehow not identifiable from the issue itself (i.e., they're wearing a mask and no caption says who they are). On a separate point, I agree with the previous commenter that these have varying merit and should not have been lumped together, because being on the cover of one magazine may be significant within a given industry and being on the cover of another may be completely trivial. Or the covers of certain magazines may have themselves gained significant attention regardless of who is on them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)