Deletion of Funagain Games

Comment: non-notable retail shop. Fails  as much as its website fails . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:WEB)

Comment: This is actually a close call. The criteria I'm going by is from  ''"A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability."'' I don't believe the NYT article quite meets this standard. The NYT is certainly a reliable source, and independent of the subject, but the depth of coverage is shallow. It looks like it appeared in a less "newsy" section of the paper. Certainly not in the business section. For that reason I think it should take multiple sources to establish notability for this article. If someone can come up with more sources I'll change my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)