Deletion of Russia and Saddam WMD allegations

Comment: I am creator of this article). According to WP rules ''this is not a majority vote''. What are concerns here? ''1. Notability.'' This is a notable controversy because it is widely known (including a lot of Google hits), ''supported by several notable people'' and describes a notable controversial subject (Iraqi WMD and possible involvement of Russia). ''2. Sources.'' There are numerous sources and all of them satisfy . Based on ''1'' and ''2'' , there are no reasons for deletion. ''3. Merging''. The only reasonable suggestion here could be merging with Post-Saddam WMD search which includes "transported to other countries" section.  However, Post-Saddam WMD search is already excessively long. So, it is simply more convenient for readers and more logical to have this article separately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE)

Comment: The sources making the allegations are all of #Sources of dubious reliability|dubious reliability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: non-notable conspiracy theory associated with a disreputable character John A. Shaw and not backed up by . Besides, Biophys deletes insertions of sourced text, that tells that John A. Shaw brought these false allegations to support president Bush on elections
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: non-notable conspiracy theory associated with a disreputable character John A. Shaw and not backed up by ; all items are sourced to NewsMax and Washington Times.  Most of the article is a list of items from the NewsMax article purporting to prove the conspiracy theory.  Anything useful here should be merged into the Shaw article and this one should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)