Deletion of Fraser Anning egg incident

Comment: It's already sufficiently merged into Fraser Anning's page. Perhaps we could add another sentence or two of details about the egg-thrower, but per above this is a serious case of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as , also does not meet  (no long lasting significance) (yet?  also applies), can be broken out of Fraser Anning article if this changes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as per our policy on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: there is nothing in this article worthy of merge to Fraser Anning. It already looks like this incident was a quarter of his political career which seems to be |undue weight for someone going a bit overboard in heckling an independent MP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: It's adequately covered in Fraser_Anning#Christchurch_mosque_shootings, which, unlike this article, does not name the person who egged the senator (nor do the sources used for that section). Per , I don't think that information should be included, so it would be preferable to delete this article than to merge it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPNAME)

Comment: I think this incident is best to be redirected to the Fraser Anning#Christchurch mosque shootings and egg incident section. The section already covered the information adequately as {{u|Jack Upland}} said. I am strongly against deleting the page since it adds size to the database. (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)