Deletion of Alan Pangborn

Comment: There's a glass-half-empty problem with the nomination which dismisses some sources but, by implication, the others are ok.  The rest seems to be arguments to avoid such as  and |WP:ITSTRIVIAL. Relevant policies such as  and  indicate that we should not be considering deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:ITSCRUFT||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: perfectly fine article with sourcing that denotes notability. If it is worth merging, it is also worth keeping. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)