Deletion of 3D-Analyze

Comment: WP:V is met with the link that I originally reported on, and just included within the page, and in my opinion, there may have been other pages as well.   may be an issue, since there is only that single guide available.  In my opinion, the product does have notability, as a third party did write an article about it - if it isn't notable enough, then you may want to create a redirect to something concerning TnL emulation or otherwise merge the information into the List_of_computer_games_that_require_pixel_shaders
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: About half of the keep reasons here refer to mine or are mine, which bases its reasoning off , which is ''the primary reason'' for keeping or deleting an article: verifiability. Of course, you could prove me wrong by demonstrating there are no/almost no verifiable sources, in which case I would change my vote to delete. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I've used this program in the past and it is definitely a unique piece of software.  Considering its widespread use, from positive (allowing modern games to be played on older hardware) to very negative (cheating at 3DMark), it should not be difficult to find sources covering this piece of software to satisfy . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: unless the  standard can be met.  Currently it isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)