Deletion of Martina Pippal

Comment: Looking at Google Scholar,https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Martina+Pippal&btnG= I think the subject does not yet meet . However, as she has multiple books, the most relevant guideline seems to be , which requires "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." There's one in German on ''Schatzkunst. Die Goldschmiede und Elfenbeinarbeiten aus österreichischen Schatzkammern des Hochmittelalters'' https://www.jstor.org/stable/42583694 but others would be useful. I will have a more careful look. I'd suggest that this AfD is held open as it has not been indexed in the most relevant deletion sorting fora, which might bring more reviewers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: After much searching I found another review, bringing it up to four reviews for three books. That's enough to convince me of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Improvements since the AfD nom have convinced me that  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)