Deletion of Dilip Kumar Pandey

Comment: The cited sources that are independent of AAM are only passing mentions, which isn't enough to prove that Pandey passes  in my opinion, and his position isn't enough to warrant a pass of . If a mention can be worked into the Aam Aadmi Party article then I would be fine with redirecting, but otherwise deletion seems the way to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: There is no doubt that the AAP is a notable party in India.  I'm not sure that it follows that being the official spokesperson of a party is itself grounds for notability (in many cases, party spokespeople are merely PR employees and do not occupy decision-making roles, for instance).  The sources prevented in this bio are either not independent (coming from the AAP itself), or do not discuss the person in any depth (usually just quoting them in relation to some other matter).  I don't feel it meets  or the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: In deference to GKCH I took another look at the sources. I still think they are trivial and do not establish notability as it is understood in  and . But if a consensus says otherwise I will be happy to listen. Maybe I am missing something
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)