Deletion of Laura Harling (2nd nomination)

Comment: I've twice tried to remove a number of inappropriate and/or non-reliable sources from this (I was brought to it by an unreliable source it was using). The first time they were stuck back by {{u|Jack1956}}, the second time my edits were reverted by {{u|Ssilvers}} with the summary "Please do not remove refs until the deletion discussion is concluded". Ermm, why not, Ssilvers? Why exactly are you permitted to edit the references while I am not? The deletion discussion notice says "Feel free to improve the article". Unless there is some policy-based reason why I should not do so, I intend to remove those poor sources for the third time so that those interested in this discussion can see more clearly what has been said about this person in |independent reliable sources, and so form an opinion on whether or not she is notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: passes  with notable theatre roles for RSC, Royal Opera House and others as confirmed in reviews by reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR)