Deletion of List of excommunicable offences in the Catholic Church

Comment: ps. article creator cites a couple of other lists, so why can't this be here but isn't that 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: somewhat reluctantly. Possibly '''Draftify''', but I don't think we're quite in  territory. It's undoubtedly a notable topic, but the manner of presentation/content is indeed a mess. Still, doesn't look like deletion is quite necessary. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: how does this meet ? or ?, where are the independent  that discusses this subject as a whole
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: The nomination just seems to be complaining about the state of the material but AFD is not cleanup.  The topic is notable -- see ''Excommunication: Its Nature, Historical Development and Effects'', for example -- and so our |editing policy applies, "Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: this is far too much detail to be useful to our readers, and appears to be a |synthesis of sources. I'd be in favor of keeping a list if present-day, current offenses of these types
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)