Deletion of Abigail Shrier

Comment: The book is notable for its extreme controversy.  But it isn't a significant monument; it's having a moment.  She isn't really notable outside of the one book (on which an article should probably be written).  This is at best a case of .  Some of the sources cited are articles of her own authorship even
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Under  (which includes journalists) a person is likely to be notable if they have created a "significant or well-known work" which this seems to be as there is consensus the book is notable, and it has been the subject of "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" which her book has. The public will not understand how a book can be notable but not its author - particularly where it is so clearly aligned with her personal views - and will want to learn more about the author
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Shrier is only notable for this book, and there are not enough  to discuss her without introducing a bias
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)