Deletion of Space Force One

Comment: for violating 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: This article is probably under rystal because that this is unverifiable, and is pure speculation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: if that doesn't violate , I don't know what does. No coverage or even speculation from reliable sources. Aside from this mildly amusing https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/opinions/outlook/amp-stories/space-force-one/ political cartoon, it doesn't even appear that anyone has thought about the issue. If this call sign is ever used, then an article might be appropriate, but until then it's just the intersection of speculation and original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: with a forecast of  - 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:CRYSTAL)