Deletion of 2020 Tangshan earthquake

Comment: per . Nothing notable about this particular quake that was a whole 5 with minor damage ''and'' no fatalities reported. Sources cited herein make only brief mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: or '''merge''' to 1976 Tangshan earthquake: I agree that |Wikipedia is not a directory and shouldn’t include every minor earthquake. Even though this isn’t a major earthquake with casualties, this is a bit more than a minor earthquake.{{pb}}There is enough significant coverage from independent reliable sources for this earthquake to overwhelmingly pass . There's a lot of in-depth local and national coverage (e.g. http://www.xinhuanet.com/2020-07/12/c_1126228516.htm Xinhua), but more importantly there is also substantial international coverage including: ''South China Morning Post'' (https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3092845/chinese-city-tangshan-hit-magnitude-51-quake-stirring-memories link), CNA (TV network)|CNA (https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/earthquake-china-tangshan-sunday-12925230 link), Associated Press (https://apnews.com/8c8b67aa46b25ef1e79f25d6a1b43804 link), Fox News (https://www.foxnews.com/world/5-1-magnitude-earthquake-shakes-northeast-china-no-injuries-reported link), ''Hindustan Times'' (https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/5-1-magnitude-earthquake-jolts-china-s-hebei-province/story-6VkhNSEBibADLg5Kj4duyH.html link). The SCMP article, for instance, goes into more than just routine coverage and describes its structural damage, its geological and cultural link to the massive 1976 Tangshan earthquake, and its temporary effects on infrastructure.{{pb}}If one looks at , this passes GNG by a mile, is more than just a routine event, and is also likely to continue to have a lasting effect not least due to the geological significance of the fault
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRITERIA)

Comment: with the exception of the Xinhua article, basically everything is a regurgitation of the six-sentence AP report.  As  states, {{tq|A minor earthquake or storm with little or no impact on human populations is probably not notable.}}  There is no continued coverage, just day-of coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT)

Comment: I agree Wikipedia should not be a catalogue for earthquakes, but in this instance the earthquake is notable. It satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to 1976 Tangshan earthquake. A new section in that article can be started with the title "Later earthquakes" or "the 2020 earthquake" or something like that. I was going to vote to keep due to the coverage, but  covers that. However, several of the sources are comparing the new earthquake to the 1976 earthquake. I therefore believe it can be selectively merged into a new section there
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)