Deletion of Caroline Wiseman

Comment: She's notable for more than one event, including being a published author https://www.worldcat.org/title/modern-art-now-from-conception-to-consumption/oclc/470642452&referer=brief_results whose books are held in academic libraries around the world. She's also a fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, which might be sufficient for #3. And she might pass : https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jun/24/the-house-and-tower-on-the-suffolk-coast-thats-a-peaceful-artists-residence ''The Observer'' (2018). None of these are strong on their own, but combined with the recent controversy around her Gormley sculptures, I think she's sufficiently notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts|RSA fellowship isn't exactly what #C3 is asking for, but it is a sign of recognition. That and the other points mentioned by {{u|pburka}} above lead me to think this article clears the bar
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: according to Royal_Society_of_Arts#Fellowship the fellowships are not a distinction any more and ''more recently fellowship is open to anyone who simply "shares the values"12 of the RSA and is "committed to supporting the mission of the RSA"''. She also fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: per nom, does not fit into , RSA does not count as JPL explained correctly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: Although I don't see any sign whatsoever of  here, there are substantial profiles of her in the Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/jun/24/the-house-and-tower-on-the-suffolk-coast-thats-a-peaceful-artists-residence and the Telegraph https://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/interiors/10073754/Interiors-a-lookout-tower-that-became-an-artists-retreat.html, albeit in the lifestyles section.  Together with other, weaker, coverage through the years, I think it's enough for .  There's some weak support from , although I don't think it would be a standalone pass of that criterion. The kerfuffle over the sculptures on the beach doesn't add so much, but also doesn't detract from notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG||WP:NCREATIVE)