Deletion of Lee Busby (2nd nomination)

Comment: Subject has been defined as meeting  and thus  is irrelevant. Renomination so soon could be seen as disruptive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: as creator. Meets , therefore NPOL is not relevant. His candidacy garnered a lot of relatively detailed coverage (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/retired-marine-colonel-to-launch-alabama-senate-write-in-campaign/2017/11/27/08816f4c-d394-11e7-9461-ba77d604373d_story.html WaPo, http://time.com/5038367/roy-moore-lee-busby-alabama-senate-race-doug-jones/ TIME, etc). And it's not a  situation either, as there's coverage about him as a sculptor, cited in the article, predating his candidacy. The "http://www.southernliving.com/culture/colonel-lee-busby-alabama-sculptor-video Southern Living" article and video is quite in-depth; together with the election-related coverage we do have enough substance for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The result of this article's Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Busby|previous nomination was keep. Following discussion, the result was that the article met |General notability guidelines. The editors who argued for this included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)