Deletion of Camp Wekeela

Comment: of the first 13 AFDs when searching "camp notability", there are 7 keeps 4 deletes 1 merge 1 redirect; Keeps are Camp Pioneer, C Tuckahoe, C Ozark, C Ramah (2nd nomination), Resica Falls Scout Reservation, C Miriam (2nd nomination), Treasure Island Scout Reservation. That's not a keep argument, but an indicator of general consensus that IF the  is met ''according to a plurality'' (not necessarily majority), the article should then be kept, whether or not the sources make it into the article immediately. Turning to the GNG, while it is true that the 38 book sources I linked are largely advertising, the fact that there are also significant-coverage sources in that set and in the article (without looking at all links to pick out which), and the fact that they are industry guides and thus good for establishing notability en masse (I think the camp goes back to 1946), should get us over the hump, along with the need to  new editors. I'm also not clear on Dan's large number of contributions to this discussion. Also, '''Axs912''', it is perfectly appropriate to add the bold word "'''keep'''" (code is '''keep''' with 3-apostrophe delimiters) to your first comment above to preserve your position
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WELCOME)

Comment: based on http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&q=%22Camp%20Wekeela%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1,bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=np sources. ADD: And certainly '''userfy''' would be a backup much preferable to deletion due to . '''Axs912''', the best approach is to take info found in several of the reliable magazines and books at that link and bring it into the article. You get a week from the nomination date of today, and you will probably get a "keep" result if you do the job right. Read as much WP policy as you can stand. Best wishes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)