Deletion of 140th Street (MVTA station)

Comment: This mass nomination is nothing more than a statement of deletion criteria devoid of supporting justification (). For example, how exactly does each article contravene  or ? And the only thing ''indiscriminate'' about all this is the random, diverse and extensive of mass nominations which cannot be properly assessed on individual merits. For the Ottawa/OC Transpo stations, note the keep on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunney's Pasture Station (OC Transpo), for example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:NOTEVERYTHING||WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: Nonsensical batch nomination of topics about transit stations.  Not only is it impossible to flesh out the notability of each individual station, but this list is all over the place; it's not only stations from different transit systems, but stations in different American states and even different ''countries''.  Those guidelines the nom throws up (, , and ) don't apply at these are very discriminate topics and ironically, the nom choose to compile an indiscriminate list of unrelated topics for this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTEVERYTHING)

Comment: Oakshade's argument is entirely persuasive.  There's nothing wrong with batch nominations, as long as they're quite closely related.  Subjects from different transit systems in different ''countries'' is not it.That being said, it sure seems, looking over this day's AfDs, that the nominator has filed several on stations on bus rapid transit (BRT) lines.  A glance at his contribution history, however, doesn't show that he's participated in any discussions as to the inherent notability of BRT stations.  Why is that?  I'm not normally a fan of  - which is far more often used as a club by Keep proponents lacking any valid arguments than otherwise - but that would seem a prerequisite here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Subjects does appear to pass , as there are very few google hits, when a search as conducted, and of those that were found none were significant or in depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)