Deletion of Logic Supply

Comment: there's certainly ''some'' coverage there but a good portion of the articles seem to simply be summaries of company-generated content (blog posts, videos and the like). There's coverage of some of their products but coverage of the company itself (the subject of this article) is very thin on the ground. Much of what ''might'' be considered coverage is very Burlington, Vermont-centric and is certainly "local" coverage. Most concerning is that in trying to establish the genesis of the coverage (as in, whether it's independent or just a reprint of company promo material) I find myself being constantly led back to http://www.logicsupply.com/blog/author/john/ this page which suggests the article creator has a not unsubstantial |conflict of interest and calls into question whether Wikipedia is simply being used to |promote the subject rather than cover it in an encyclopaedic fashion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:PROMO)

Comment: The local press coverage doesn't establish notability.  On the other hand, Anandtech, and Tom's Hardware are |reliable sources which I would use to count towards notability.  And although the coverage is not specifically about the company, it's about their products and clearly associates the products to the company in the reviews which are significant.  However, coverage in two different sources isn't enough for me.  If there were other publications or sources with equivalent coverage, it might push it over for me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)