Deletion of Operation Tight Screw (3rd nomination)

Comment: multiple |reliable sources give |in-depth coverage on the subject of this AfD. Therefore, the subject appears to pass , and thus should not be deleted. Most of the sources I found, are not sources from the West, but that does not make those sources any less reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:INDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: The nominator provides no reason for nominating again, when his two previous nominations failed and the most recent one was less than six months ago. The subject was notable in October 2012 so it's still notable now, even if it's received no more coverage: . Darkness Shines, please stop nominating this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: Not existing does not mean something is not notable. Also |Notability is not temporary - this achieved notability at one point, it doesn't "lose it" because the operation has failed to materialise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)