Deletion of Pol Goossen

Comment: The individual has done http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0329661/filmotype numerous film and television projects and is written of in multiple non-English sources. A long and verifiable career in film and television projects meets . Notable to Belgium is perfectly fine for en.Wikipedia, and being improvable rarely requires an article to be deleted. The man may be , but he '''IS''' known there... and that's what counts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:UNKNOWNHERE)

Comment: Seriously, if you just search Belgian websites (ie: search google via '''"Pol Goossen" site:*.be''' and then translate, you will find it is very easy to demonstrate notability.  Notability isn't a function of being covered by English speaking media.   requires we try a little harder before we nominate, particularly with foreign subjects (or don't nom if we aren't sure how to search for these topics).  This is why I removed the PROD tag, IMDB shows he has been in 985 episodes of a TV show, that should tell you that other coverage is at least "likely", if you search hard enough.  These were just on the first page: http://www.humo.be/tws/deze-week/22371/3000-x-thuis-pol-goossen-of-de-herwaardering-van-de-frank.html, http://www.libelle.be/lib/mama-en-co/10080/de-7-zomerzonden-van-pol-goossen.html#, http://www.gva.be/antwerpen/lier/pol-goossen-speelt-driekoningentriptiek.aspx, http://www.radio2.be/la-prima/hoe-zou-het-zijn-met-pol-goossen.  I am sure I can provide another dozen if needed, but that should clearly establish notability.  Article needs work, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)