Deletion of İlksen Şermin Özdemir

Comment: No evidence the subject meets the GNG.  None at all, and were we going to take anyone to ANI, I'd just as soon it be the people tossing around |bad faith accusations when it's plain they've not taken so much as a cursory look at the sources involved.  The GNG stipulates that a source provide the subject coverage in "significant detail" to qualify as supporting notability.  Simple namedrops do not, ''and never have'', qualified.  As far as NHOCKEY goes, even if presumptive notability to any level of women's hockey was accorded (which it is not, save for participation at the Olympic Games, which falls under a different SNG), it provides no presumptive notability for ''men's play'' below the topmost pool at the Worlds.  She has, of course, no presumptive notability as a figure skater,  not granting the same to junior-level competition. Would CeeGee or Smartyllama care to proffer a ''valid'' ground upon which to keep the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NSKATE)

Comment: per CeeGee. It is obvious from this and other mass nominations that nominator didn't bother to do a stitch of . This is getting completely out of hand
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: It is obvious to me that this player fails both  and .  However if experienced user
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY||WP:GNG)