Deletion of Chasten Buttigieg

Comment: per  as shown in sources above and in the article. This should never have been brought to AfD. It might be a candidate for redirection, but definitely not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: No one has suggested that notability has or should be been inherited, so that argument is a straw man.  applies, since sufficient source articles exist that focus specifically on the subject. This article is important because is documents a historical first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability is |not inherited, so people do not clear the notability bar just because of who they happen to be married to — and that's true even if the marriage happens to generate a bit of human interest coverage because the person he's married to currently happens to be a candidate for political office, because it still isn't about ''Chasten'' doing anything noteworthy in his own right. Obviously if my dream of seeing a gay US president in my lifetime comes true next year, Chasten will qualify for an article at that time as the new First Gentleman, and if he accomplishes something else in the meantime that would get him over an SNG, such as publishing a best-selling book about his life as the husband of a presidential candidate and thus clearing , then that will also change the equation. But GNG is not just a matter counting up the footnotes and keeping anything that happens to exceed two — we also take into account the ''context'' of what the person is getting coverage ''for'', and this is not a context that clears the bar. And even ''with'' a couple of media hits in the mix, this as written is still parked about 70 per cent on |primary sources, like YouTube videos and press releases and the self-published websites of his own employers, that do not count as support for notability ''at all
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: see  - prior to the presidential bid by his spouse, this BLP would have remained unknown and would not have passed GNG, and again...notability is not inherited. {{xt|If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: With |significant international coverage about him specifically,https://www.businessinsider.com/pete-buttigiegs-husband-chasten-buttigieg-2020-candidate-2019-4https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chasten-buttigieg-on-his-husband-petes-presidential-aspirations-for-real/https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/29/pete-buttigieg-husband-chasten-226335https://www.marieclaire.com/politics/a27179973/chasten-buttigieg-interview-pete-buttigieg-campaign/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/12/pete-buttigieg-husband-chasten-2020-presidential-campaign this easily passes  and . We routinely include biographies of notable politicians when coverage in reliable sources is significant. See for example Casey DeSantis, Judith Giuliani, and Ann Romney. The presence or absence of articles about the parents and children of celebrities have no bearing on this AfD since Buttigieg is not Mayor Pete's parent or child, not is Mayor Pete a celebrity per se.  is the foundation of our notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets .https://www.indystar.com/story/news/2019/04/09/chasten-buttigieg-what-we-know-pete-buttigiegs-husband/3398186002/https://slate.com/human-interest/2019/04/pete-chasten-buttigieg-hinge-marriage-dating-app-president.htmlhttps://www.businessinsider.in/meet-chasten-buttigieg-the-husband-of-democratic-presidential-candidate-mayor-pete-who-is-a-high-school-teacher-and-dog-dad/articleshow/68836425.cmshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/pete-and-chasten-buttigieg-lori-lightfoot-and-amy-eshleman-the-powerful-lgbt-message-of-a-hug-and-a-kisshttps://www.marieclaire.com/politics/a26854696/pete-buttigieg-husband-chasten-glezman/http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/03/pete-buttigiegs-husband-may-be-our-first-first-gentleman.htmlhttps://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a26963386/chasten-buttigieg-twitter/https://www.marieclaire.com/politics/a27179973/chasten-buttigieg-interview-pete-buttigieg-campaign/https://www.marieclaire.com/politics/a27179973/chasten-buttigieg-interview-pete-buttigieg-campaign/https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/03/29/pete-buttigieg-husband-chasten-226335 ---&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Pete Buttigieg since, despite the numerous sources cited in this disicussion, subject lacks independent notability. To provide some perspective, we have an article on Jane O'Meara Sanders, the wife of another presidential candidate, but she is |verifiably and independently already notable as "provost and interim president of Goddard College and president of Burlington College." She'd have her own article, per , even if she had never met Bernie Sanders in her life
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)