Deletion of Ash M. Richter

Comment: actual googling her results in considerable media, including her Google Scholar page with numerous publications and several 3rd party articles--all of which qual as |independent. Majority of third party citations do mention the subject by name, and/or are interviews or quotations of public addresses by subject. I continue to repeat my ongoing concern that female scientist stubs are being deleted from Wikipedia without due diligence and with prejudice. And if an archaeologist who now leads technology projects for the CIA isn't wikipedia worthy- what is? Or does she have to be a man to count?...Keep and reassess the standards and editorial standards that are blocking female scientists from having the presence they deserve User: Anonymous (because I'm tired of being trolled by male editors for objecting to their edits of women's wikis)   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS)

Comment: I'm struggling to see evidence of notability. Perhaps a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON for  for this very-recent PhD.  Google Scholar page https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xzThgY4AAAAJ shows very small citation numbers for NPROF C1, and there are no signs of the other criteria of NPROF, nor of other notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Citations on Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xzThgY4AAAAJ show the subject is not ready for . And we have no sign of the multiple in-depth reliable independent sources needed for  — I thought from the title that the "Women Advancing GEOINT" source might at least provide a single one, but it only quotes Richter briefly, so fails to be in-depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)