Deletion of General Assembly (school)

Comment: While some of the references are promotional, it's not reasonable to claim that NPR, the New York Times, and the LA Times articles all fail  because their stories include quotes from people affiliated with the company; they have sufficient coverage apart from those quotes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: That's all very well so long as you realize that you are essentially agreeing that the sources fail  but your own opinion is that the article should be kept anyway
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: There's a discussion at the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Is_TechCrunch_a_reliable_source%3F Reliable Sources Noticeboard that points out TechCrunch (generally) fails ORGIND. Forbes is even worse. Therefore it isn't  complaint unless you can provide two other sources that will meet the criteria for establishing notabilty
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: does not meet  / . A promotional page for a for-profit institution. Sources lack  and are routine notices,  and / or passing mentions. Appears to be part of a promo walled garden around Adam Pritzker; the name sounded familiar because I had nominated one of articles related to him for deletion. The page under discussion was created by an account with few edits outside this topic, so COI-based editing is likely: Special:Contributions/Mentes. Delete, on the balance of things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP)

Comment: per {{U|HighKing}}'s excellent analysis of the sources which I have checked and concur with. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)