Deletion of Canadian Pointer

Comment: The only hint of a reference (http://www.sarahsdogs.com/breeds/canadian_pointer/ here) does not appear to be |reliable. The site, along with the article, are the only two mentions I can find concerning " Canadian Pointer Club of America" which might indicate some information was used from the site. Following a link, http://canadianpointers.ca/ leads to a Kennel site with the title; "ENGLISH" POINTERS. A link http://www.pawsandeffects.com/PCC/PCC/Entries/2010/1/31_Winter_Newsletter_2010.html here mentions "Canadian Pointers" but refers to Pointers from Canada and not a breed. A '''''suggestion to merge''''' the article to Pointer (dog_breed) would do nothing but degrade an article that already struggles from multiple problems including a very short lead, |advertisement (Pointer (dog breed)#History|here), lack of citations (tagged), and other problems. The end result would be a bigger problematic article with a section that totally fails |notability. The main problem is that I read somewhere that if an article (or section) does not have a source or reference it does not have a place on Wikipedia. I can look this up but I am sure it is known. I keep running into articles on Wikipedia that do not have any references, some created as far back as 2001, with many that have antiquated reference tags, and can't help but wonder if olicies|policies are an intended criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia or just a suggestion that is negated by the policy to gnore all rules|ignore all rules
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE||WP:ADVERTISEMENT||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:P||WP:I)

Comment: Most Ghits are mirrors of or sourced by this WP article. The few that ''might'' not be are blogs or other non- sources. Gbook hits are false positives, or are one of those recent WP-based slapped-together things. I've removed from the article the claim of recognition by the American Rare Breed Association, which is contradicted by http://arba.org/BreedsByNameABC1.htm their website. Given the lack of evidence, I suppose that this could be a hoax, but I suspect that it's just a non-notable, failed attempt to create a new breed. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)