Deletion of Tribalwar

Comment: Cleaning this article up a bit should be sufficient enough to bring it in line with  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Neither  nor  have been violated by Tribalwar's entry. This delete nomination is a mean spirited counter-attack by Shane on an organization he has a well-know vandetta against. Shane, if you wish to become a Wiki moderator as your personal page suggests, you might not want to engage in this blantent sort of childish behavior in the future. Tribalwar isn't the only place you'll get fired from as an admin
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NPOV)

Comment: User shane's actions are not  due to an off site personal attack.
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NPA)

Comment: fails ; agree with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: It took me a while to determine which way to go, but once you boil it's all down, this is ultimately a |vanity article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY)

Comment: This looks like a serious case of meatpuppetry. ''Closing admin:'' Please don't be intimidated by the hordes of new users - remember that regardless of hordes of new users,  is non-negotiable, and none of the sources in the article are |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: I'll also like to note that the TW members have some serious |ownership issues with regard to this article. This is why I doubt that a rewrite will properly scrub the article of it's  status
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN||WP:VANITY)

Comment: per  and  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:WEB)

Comment: Most Internet forums are not notable (in my opinion), and this one doesn't make much of a case as far as . I see claims on this AfD that it could have reliable sources, but as nobody has added any to the article, I have a certain degree of doubt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: no references to other |reliable sources that mention events in this article are provided, thus fails |verifiability test. We've been Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eon8|here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eon8 (2nd nomination)|before; verifiability is non-negotiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: fails . Mere mentions of a web-site in the media aren't enough; the text of the notability guideline is "The content itself has been the '''subject''' of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself" (my emphasis). Sock flood not a good sign; see http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?s=b6105388d7e0d02d9ca2588c78f82d12&t=442416 this thread on the tribalwar forums. More than usual, all keep votes here by new users should be discounted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: By  guidelines, a website is fit for an article if it has appeared in a major outside source.  Various outside sources have mentioned www.tribalwar.com due to the internet meme All Your Base.  Also by the same, http://pc.gamezone.com, as well as a multitude of other gaming-related newssites have mentioned Tribalwar in relation to the Tribes franchise.  These qualify it under .   only comes into play when there is a debate over any information given in the article.  This is easily remidied by editing, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB||WP:NPOV)