Deletion of Umbrella term

Comment: to '''hypernym'''. According to https://definitions.uslegal.com/u/umbrella-term/ this, https://books.google.com/books?id=lDklDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA165&dq=hypernym+umbrella this, https://books.google.com/books?id=Og8rJGaXCDwC&pg=PA73&dq=hypernym+umbrella this and https://books.google.com/books?id=W_MJkq-3scQC&pg=PA77&dq=hypernym+umbrella this, it should probably redirect to hypernym. Looks like an unintentional  (content split) ie. two articles on the same topic. "Umbrella term" is a metaphor while hypernym the linguistic term. Hypernym is found in dictionaries like https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/hypernym Oxford but umbrella term is not
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CSPLIT)

Comment: No compliance with efore, which sets up a set of hurdles before proposing deletion; and an agenda for handling the question.  Article can be improved.  Sources exist.  Content can be expanded.  Useful subject and day-to-day concept.  That article needs improvement is not a reason to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: The word "umbrella term" has been useful on Wikipedia, and we can see sources in the links above using the term. But if there are no reliable sources, or barely any, discussing use of the term itself, deletion is probably best. We do have articles about terms, but we employ  for that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WORDISSUBJECT)