Deletion of Timothy J. Dyches

Comment: Straightforward application of : "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, '''intellectually independent of each other''', and independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: There is no inherent notability inherent in being one of 106 authorities of this particular organization. Does not appear to satisfy . If there's significant coverage in multiple reliable and INDEPENDENT sources, it should be identified
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as not reaching , which (as I've stated elsewhere, such as the recent WP:ENT#1 conversations) should be, in my view, required for all, or nearly all, BLPs.  That having been said, I think the keep here votes approach a concern that may need to be raised more broadly.   (which is an essay, part of COMMONOUTCOMES) suggests that bishops in the RCC and Orthodox churches are usually found notable. I don't know if that's correct (it might not be), and the parallels are imperfect, of course, and if it is correct, I don't know if it is simply because bishops and GAs receive different amounts of coverage, but if there is an underlying systemic bias issue here, a broader discussion (at NPERSON, the village pump, in an RfC, etc.) might be warranted, as individual AfDs get relatively little participation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:CLERGY)