Deletion of Doctor Who 2009 (fan series)

Comment: Bad sources, . Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters • :User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: unless some |reliable source reporting on it can be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Reasons: 1. (Good sources) The Doctor Who 2009 fan series has been covered twice by Fan Cinema Today, a reputable site which is ran by the author of the internationally released book "Homemade Hollywood", and the entry references the site 2. (Good Sources) This article cites more sources than the article for the "Star Trek: Phase II" fan series and many other fan series articles. 3. (Good Sources) Google search turns up numerous articles and info on the project for me. 4. (Not |crystal-balling) The article only reports in a non-bias manner on events or coverage that has already occurred and references materials that have already been released. 5. I found out that members of the Outpost Gallifrey Staff work on the project, and this may be a reason it has not been covered by them (i.e., so as not to appear to be bias), Doctor Who Online (which is as notable as Outpost Gallifrey) asked the producers through The Doctor Who Forum to contact them about promoting the series. 6 (Notability) The project's facebook page has nearly 700 fans, the video of the first trailer received over 25,000 hits, and the series YouTube Channel became #14 Most Subscribed of the week the very day it went up. This is all evidence that it is a popular fan series that has general awareness. 7. The series website links to third party articles written about them. These articles range for short snippets to full on interviews with cast and crew, many of which have not even been referenced here yet. 8. The producers of the series have stated in several places that the first episode is finished and awaiting release on the new date they have voted on. They have just not pubically announced the date because of their marketing plan
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: No notability established.  Appears to be chiefly |speculation about things that have yet to happen, and may not ever, all cited from either primary source or a few forums, not |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:RS)