Deletion of Peter J. Flood

Comment: Unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in and of itself — if you cannot demonstrate and |properly source that he was already eligible for an article for some other reason ''independent'' of his candidacy, then he has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to be deemed notable because candidate per se. But this demonstrates no preexisting notability, and is not sourced to any substantive coverage about him to park a  claim on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources in the article are very cursory and so he lacks depth of coverage even in the articles relating to .  So he doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability|Wikipedia's criteria for notability. T
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: there are many great Americans with impressive backgrounds serving our country. I salute them. However, very few meet  or . The Lieutenant, regrettably, does not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: Practically zero coverage in reliable sources. No coverage not related to his candidacy for office. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BASIC)