Deletion of Scientific spirituality

Comment: per #OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Agree this article is essentially an essay advocating a view. There are currently a number of more |neutrally toned and |reliably sourced articles on subjects related to the Relationship between religion and science
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:RS)

Comment: as a barely coherent personal essay in violation of #OR point #3.  The article contains this sentence which, on top of the  issue is invokes, looks to be its thesis "The union of science and spirituality is destined and must happen."  The only directly referenced statements are quotes taken from other works, and the rest of the work is tangential argument in support of a point of view.  &hArr
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: It may have potential, but that's if it was a legitimate topic. Also, as said above, "#OR point #3". The article is just a biased essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)