Deletion of Timeline of Harry Potter

Comment: for being nothing else than a plot dump (#PLOT) of trivia, if seen from a real-world perspective as it should be. A proper timeline article would have to look like Harry Potter#Origins and publishing history, and not be a fictional timeline without relevance in the real world. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per our |editing policy.  The sourcing is easy to improve as there are entire books written about this stuff such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Q9I1OB0fJJQC Harry Potter and History''.  We already document numerous aspects of the setting in the Harry Potter universe article and some chronology and history seems a sensible addition to this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: per  and ordinary |community best practice, as evidenced by these AFDs on similar topics:{{Collapse top
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT||WP:POLICY)

Comment: as recreation of deleted content (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of the Harry Potter series (5th nomination)). If G4 is not met, then '''Delete''' because it fails  and , there are only primary sources and one unreliable. The source cited above doesn't provide significant enough coverage to warrant a stand-alone article, and we would need multiple sources anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT||WP:GNG)