Deletion of Mickey O'Malley

Comment: Mostly |excessive plot summary and |excessive trivia which, as Pcap notes, seems to be |original research based on some youtube videos
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:TRIVIA||WP:OR)

Comment: Sources, which are all Youtube clips, plainly and clearly fail reliability standards. I performed a (fairly quick) search of my own for additional potential sourcing and came up basically empty. I fail to see how  applies here -- incorporating  articles on non-notable subjects isn't exactly "improving the encyclopedia" so much as it is "filling the encyclopedia with questionable content." Read Wikipedia:What_"Ignore_all_rules"_means for clarity on proper application of that rule -- it's not intended to justify, you know, everything. This isn't "nothing is true, everything is permitted" territory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:OR)

Comment: Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it.  The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  |Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.  Note, am now copying this to several AFD, which are the same, nominated by the same person, with the same invalid argument about mindlessly following the guidelines passed by deletionists campers as an excuse to get rid of things they personally don't like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)