Deletion of Jim Codd

Comment: Nothing against the subject, just to be clear, but serving on a county council is not in and of itself grounds for a Wikipedia article — in Ireland, unfortunately, the ''only'' politicians who get a guaranteed pass of  just for the fact of holding political office are actual Teachtaí Dála. For politicians at the ''local'' level of office, including county councillors, the notability test is not just the ability to verify that he exists, but the ability to write a really substantial article that |reliably sources some genuine context for his political ''importance'', e.g. by demonstrating that he has much more nationalized significance than the norm for county councillors. But the county council's own self-published website about itself, a piece of raw technical verification of election results and a tiny smattering of purely local campaign coverage in the local media is not enough sourcing to do that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS)

Comment: Wexford County Councillor. County councilmembers are not afforded the presumption of notability under . Bearcat says it best about when a local elected official is able to demonstrate an article is appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Aside from the fact that the content is so obviously and overtly promotional, the subject does not meet  or . On the latter, the subject has never held national or similar office (only very recently being elected to a local council). On the former, the only coverage of the subject is the run-of-the-mill coverage about his candidacy in the pending general election. The only material coverage is the relatively limited coverage that is already linked in the article. (Much of which, frankly, appears to have been copy/pasted into Wikipedia without consideration to  or  guidelines. To the extent that, in honesty, this could likely have been speedy deleted under  (as unambiguous promotion) or  (as clear copyvio of the few local news pieces upon which it is based
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL||WP:COPYVIO||WP:CLOP||WP:G11||WP:G12)

Comment: a non notable county counillor, no sigcov, Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per , and as follows. We almost always delete local officials as |run of the mill and failing |our particular standards. It's extremely unlikely that |this hard-fought consensus will change before the upcoming 2020 election, for which he's a third party candidate. Sure, it's possible he could win, although |my intuition doesn't carry me that far. Finally, he fails |the prof test as a teacher at a vocational school
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:MILL||WP:NPOL||WP:CCC||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:PROF)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BASIC)