Deletion of Outside In (organization)

Comment: I'm having trouble figuring out why the nom says there is ''no'' mention in independent media or other reliable sources as I have come up with dozens of mentions, many of them substantive and not just passing mentions. And "some local news articles" includes many articles in ''The Oregonian'' which is a statewide paper and thus regional and not just local, as well as ''Willamette Week'', the ''Portland Tribune'', ''Portland Monthly'', etc. I think the organization's name may have been a rather difficult search term to use to do  but with a bit of extra work there are many citations to be found, including several scholarly citations. Anyway, I've begun to expand the article, please take a look now. I will continue to expand the article so that I feel it will pass . If you take a look at the sources available in the now-modified search template above it may help
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: Passes . Source examples include: https://books.google.com/books?id=FR8Aupl6C_QC&pg=PA77&lpg=PA77#v=onepage&q&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=FR8Aupl6C_QC&pg=PA116&dq=%22Outside+In%22+Portland+-Wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjF57i368bJAhUHpYMKHYx6AQIQ6AEIKzAA#v=onepage&q=%22Outside%20In%22%20Portland%20-Wikipedia&f=false (scroll down), http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/news/2015/11/champions-change-build-bridges-between-youth-and-law-enforcement, http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/09/homeless_youth_get_job_experie.html, https://www.nhchc.org/directory/outside-in/,  http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2013/05/with_funding_intact_outside_in.html, http://youth.gov/feature-article/hand-and-paw-partnership-benefits-homeless-youth, https://books.google.com/books?id=NU4rAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA35&dq=%22Outside+In%22,+homeless,+Portland,+oregon&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwio2KTK6MbJAhXEt4MKHbKyAFoQ6AEIPjAE#v=onepage&q=%22Outside%20In%22%2C%20homeless%2C%20Portland%2C%20oregon&f=false, http://www.oregonlive.com/pets/index.ssf/2011/11/pet_talk_day_care_serves_dogs.html, http://news.streetroots.org/2014/12/29/second-chances-25-years-outside-s-needle-exchange-program. Also keep per ; the article has been significantly expanded by {{u|Valfontis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:HEY)

Comment: I plan to expand the article further, but I want to register my keep before this is closed on the grounds that this organization clearly passes  in that coverage of it can be found in "in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization". Lack of citations in the article is not a criterion for deletion, when there are sources available, and though there is more coverage that could be added, I believe the article as it stands shows there is sufficient independent coverage (including books, magazines, newspapers, and research papers) and to pass a minimum standard of |notability. I'd invite {{ping|Delta13C}} to reevaluate the supposed lack of mentions in independent media. I'm also having trouble finding a guideline that says local sources (noting that the organization is located in the largest metro area in the state and one of the three largest metros in the region, so when we're talking "local" that doesn't mean it's a place like, say Greenhorn, Oregon|Greenhorn) are not reliable sources. In any case, the organization, as cited in the article, is notable as one of the first free clinics on the west coast, as a pioneer in needle exchange programs, and as a pioneer in naloxone dispensing legislation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NONPROFIT||WP:GNG)