Deletion of Aubrey Wade

Comment: a  shows no RSes actually about the subject. And Northamerica1000, if you don't want aspersions cast on your behaviour then it helps not to provide substance for such by querulous behaviour around deletion issues, as multiple users have noted you being in the past week or two. Please cool it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Meets criteria #3 of . Struck part of my comment above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Subject meets #3 for creating a http://www.unhcr.org/no-stranger-place.html well-known work which has been primary subject of multiple independent reliable sources. Sources: https://www.thelocal.at/20160902/afghan-mother-and-child-land-on-their-feet-in-austria-unhcr-no-stranger-place-integration, https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2016/sep/07/refugees-and-their-european-hosts-in-pictures-aubrey-wade-no-stranger-place, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-463028808.html{{paywall}}, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-279400682.html{{paywall}}, http://www.morgenpost.de/politik/article208185999/Familienfotos-mal-anders-Europaeer-und-ihre-Fluechtlinge.html(German), http://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/2016-09/syrische-fluechtlinge-aufnahme-deutschland-familienportraets(German
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The availability of sources online is not necessarily an absolute indicator of notability, but as it stands, not much is actually available online. Perhaps other offline sources are available. It comes across that the subject could possibly meet , but without access to sources, it's unable to be discerned
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)