Deletion of Rosie O'Donnell and Donald Trump Controversy

Comment: per . Wikipedia is not a news source for every current event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The Wikipedia is  the National Enquirer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom. Current article cites no sources at all and fails to meet . If it can be shown that the New York Times is tracking this story, well, then I'd say keep. The argument that "You don't know where this controversy will lead, so you can't judge this article yet" falls under . The contributors should certainly keep their notes and drafts of the article in progress, so that if it becomes major news they won't need to dig it all out again, but there's no need at all for this article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: and  and  and perfectly gopod reasons to delete something '''right now''', especially with an article like this where if you mess up, you get sued
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)