Deletion of History of For Better or For Worse

Comment: per .   This comes back to "can a page rely on its parent for notability?".  And my reading of  is yes, but the notability of the topic as a whole better justify it.  This clearly is well past that justification as this comic is hugely notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE||WP:SIZE)

Comment: per : ''"Wikipedia articles on published works (such as fictional stories) should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's development and historical significance, not solely a detailed summary of that work's plot."''  Just because the topic is notable does not mean that it's appropriate to write in-universe information at length in an encyclopedia with no secondary sources to analyze such a history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: this trivia per . We already have For_Better_or_For_Worse#Key_storylines for the important stories. This trivia ("Lawrence breaks his leg in a bicycle accident  ...  Farley goes to obedience classes") can go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: Fails  by design. Not only does the article contain nothing but plot with no real world context, that's all it could ever do.  is not an excuse to make an article that does not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Sometimes when articles grow long it's because there's material that shouldn't be there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:SS)