Deletion of Stuart Baggs (3rd nomination)

Comment: the sources listed in the article are sufficient to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fulfils  as well as  by the fact that in addition to being the subject of coverage from several reliable 3rd-party sources, that coverage includes more than just the Apprentice appearance. You could also make a case of him being notable under  for his appearances on several other TV programmes as well. Plus the information on his death was extensively covered and not many get several articles on their death from the likes of the BBC. Even after his death, more coverage was available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:ENT)

Comment: somewhat contrary to my usual deletionist tendencies. Satisfies  with solid RS refs. Doesn't fall foul of single-event, on account of the TV appearances and the widely-reported death, albeit only just. Not intended to promote anyone's career, etc. I'm not arguing that the subject is the most noteworthy, but it does seem notable in the WP sense, and I can't really think of a good reason to delete. And given the publicity this chap generated, if I were to come to Wikipedia and ''not'' find an article on him, I would be at least mildly surprised; an entirely unofficial inclusion criterion, perhaps, but somehow to me that feels like the proverbial litmus test
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)