Deletion of Violet Blue (author)

Comment: Too much wikidrama, not notable enough.  Notability as a writer is not inherited from whom one writes. See also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: along with the number of articles from |reliable sources visible from a gnews search(LA Times, SF Chronicle, Chicago Tribune, NY Times etc...) and her winning a Independent Publisher Book Award, I also found two Library Journal reviews.  All of this certainly bring her to WP:n|notability.  Here are the reviews I found via my libraries EBSCO database
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I was unsure about this one but, reading the article more closely, there's really nothing of substance here. The article does not meet BLP because there is really nothing about ''her'' here. After a brief mention of her writing career, the article becomes a |coatrack for talking about the lawsuit and BoingBoing "controversy." For the points ChunkyRice brought up: 1) notability is not inherited, so being an employee of a notable company does not immediately make one notable; 2) doesn't qualify as a notable award in any capacity; 3) the BoingBoing flap is just blogosphere stuff, and does not establish wide notability for her; 4) out of all the cites in the article, the primary focus is on the lawsuit. While interesting, that's basically '''one''' event here, not enough to base the entire article around for notability. Overall, I don't find enough here to establish notability outside a very narrow interest, much less a  compliant article. If the article is kept for some reason, it needs to be pared down dramatically to remove the coatracking and the non-notable books she's published. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COAT||WP:BLP)

Comment: Seems to mostly consist of various blogosphere events which, for the most part, have not made it into the mainstream press and are not reliably sourced (or sourceable). Per  and  I think deletion is a good idea. (I'd suggest the nom substitute "person" for "chick" - we shouldn't be denigrating people in noms, no matter of one's opinion on them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:N)