Deletion of Quadminton

Comment: not |verifiable, not |notable, and smells very y
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:NOTABLE||WP:MADEUP)

Comment: For being total |bollocks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)

Comment: The spamfest being orchestrated by the authour is not remotely helpful here. Google throws up 54 sources, but ommits all but 9 because they're so similar. Indeed, almost every single site it throws up is part of the aforementioned spamfest. It appears the same message has been posted to every forum and twitter page to be found. If it was the subject of '''a single''' .... but it's not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per , , and . Also '''Checkuser''' article creator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP||WP:HOAX||WP:NEO)

Comment: per , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP||WP:HOAX)

Comment: Sounds like fun and I hope it catches on.  
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: First time I've seen something that |really was made up in school one day in some time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: another |SPA IP has changed "world-renowned" to "up-and-coming" - but see  - and added a link to bbc.co.uk/sport which, needless to say, says http://search.bbc.co.uk/search?uri=%2Fsport&scope=all&go=toolbar&q=Quadminton nothing about Quadminton
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:UPANDCOMING)

Comment: No |reliable sources seem to exist, so completely |unverifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)