Deletion of 2006–07 York City F.C. season

Comment: They clearly satisfy , and it would be very hard to get good article status if they didn't
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It is clear that  has been met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I looked quickly at 2008–09 York City F.C. season. Can you tell me which of the sources aren't routine match reports or transfer announcements. Honestly I don't see many if any that aren't routine. Also about the GA status. It is possible to write a nice article from  sources and as a GAN is reviewed my one user it is quite possible that these articles don't actually meet GNG. Reading the article you basically just summarise the transfers and results using routine sources. I ask {{ping|Spiderone|Nfitz|GiantSnowman|Smartyllama|Fenix down}} to list any sources that show these articles meet GNG. Also to MtW your listed reliable non-routine sources are (all comments are about 08-09 only): BBC Sport (every single one of those in 08-09 are match reports or transfer announcements); Non-League Daily (transfer announcement); The Non-League Paper (not in 08-09 so no comment); The Press (I see one that could be seen as non-routine but the rest are transfer/match reports). I urge those !voting keep to back-up their argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: As the three (yes, ''three'') GAs listed in this AfD demonstrate, club seasons at this level are able to pass .  They garner independent coverage from multiple reliable sources, including BBC Sport, Non-League Daily, ''The Non-League Paper'', and from local media, most notably ''The Press (York)|The Press'' for the club in question
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)