Deletion of St. Casimir Roman Catholic Parish (Yonkers, New York)

Comment: Churches may be notable as historic buildings, but parishes almost never will be. There's nothing here that would prompt me to keep this article. Same with most of the other similar articles. WlaKom's comments about religious discrimination and intolerance are uncalled for. I am interested in church history, but I certainly don't want to see articles about every parish of any denomination. This falls into the category of a non-notable local branch of a major organisation, which fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: per the WP:ORG guideline and general  rules.  Disclosure: I am another one of the Episcopalians, and I often visit my brother who lives in Yonkers.  In fact, enWP has over 500 stubs and articles on Roman Catholic ''churches'', see :Category:Roman_Catholic_churches, and the giant List of the Catholic dioceses of the United States, with links to every single diocese and almost all their bishops.  Church buildings are ''often'' notable, and dioceses and bishops of major denominations are ''almost always'' notable.   However, parishes would not be, and in such cases, are often redirected to the building, for example, ''Saint Savior Parish'' is the parish of the Cathedral of Saint John the Divine, New York
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability for an organization such as a parish or religious congregation is determined by the guideline , which this one fails due to a lack of reliable and independent sources with significant coverage. Most religious congregations are not in fact notable organizations, and their articles typically get deleted in AFD. "I like it" or having "Some sourcing" or an article being "well written" or their being a "community organization" falls far short of the requirements of . There are hundreds of thousands of equally nonnotable religious congregations in the US. Notability cannot be inherited simply from their owning a historic building, which in fact already has its own article. If there were no article for the building, then that might be an argument for a combination article on the building and its congregation. In this case, there could be a redirect to the article about the building. See the essay  for the views of some editors on what makes for a notable congregation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:CONG)