Deletion of Safety Not Guaranteed

Comment: A direct quote from : "''The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. This means that we only publish material that is verifiable with reference to reliable, published sources.''"  The burden of proof is on the one claiming notability, and if we can't verify this yet, we don't want it yet.  After it becomes a verifiably notable meme, we can re-create a standalone article, if people think one is warranted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I should probably mention that if this survives as a standalone article, it's probably going to need to be cut ''way'' back to meet with policies and guidelines.  The whole "Investigation" section violates , and the copyright status of the first image (Timetravel.jpg) is bogus, just to name two examples
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: You're right about notability not being a policy or guideline, but many people here see it as a logical application of  and/or , which are.  Furthermore, a claim of notability made within the context of the article needs to be just as verifiable as any other fact. The article states "this internet phenomenon has found many homes", and if that's not verifiably the case, it doesn't belong in the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:VAIN)

Comment: only socres a couple of hundred Googles - it's a minor YTMND fad, not even an Internet meme.  |Wikipedia is not the YTMND FAQ
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)