Deletion of Human photosynthesis

Comment: I agree with the arguments above that this is  and . The journal articles are all either not credible or not relevant, so RS is an issue as well. ''OJPsych'' and ''Neuroscience and Medicine'' are published by Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP), which is on http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/ Beall's list of predatory open access publishers. ''PLOS One'' is peer reviewed, but doesn't really have standards for inclusion. The ''Journal of Neurological Sciences (Turkish)'' is peer reviewed, though small and open-access. ''Current Biology'' is a real journal, although there are some very similarly named fake ones. So, yes, this is OR, SYN and speculative nonsense. CoI disclaimer: I have no competing interests and have not edited the article. Voting editors with a potential conflict of interest should disclose that here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN)

Comment: When trimmed of content that is  and , what is left is non-notable content sourced to low quality publications (as noted by Roches above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Fails |notability and makes extreme claims without reliable sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)