Deletion of DiskCryptor

Comment: Software the article is about is encyclopedic, and should certainly be given the chanced to be edited into something more substantial (atm it's just a stub). Where on earth do comments relating to "possible malware" come from?! I can see absolutely no grounding for this, and comments like that certainly are far from complying with 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: The article has some encyclopaedic material though, but it has no sources to comply with  and . If editors can show that they have |reliable sources from where they wrote this article, then I'll change my delete opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:RS)