Deletion of Alcorconazo (2nd nomination)

Comment: Term seems to have become a synonym for an unexpected victory of a weak team over a much stronger team in the spanish media, as you can see from articles like http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.superdeporte.es%2Ffutbol%2F2010%2F02%2F12%2Fxerez-planea-alcorconazo%2F86797.html  and http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lavanguardia.es%2Ffree%2Fedicionimpresa%2Fres%2F20100217%2F53893440505.html%3Furlback%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.lavanguardia.es%2Fpremium%2Fedicionimpresa%2F20100217%2F53893440505.html. Definitely more than |routine sports news and worthy of it's own article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Just another football game. So the underdog won... like that's never happened before. Smacks of recentism, and there seems to be a lot of discussion on keeping because it has become ''synonomous with the underdog winning''. The article is written only about this game, not about the synonym, which would fail as a |neologism anyway. Coverage of this game is no more or less than any coverage expected of a football game where a bit of an upset has occurred making it ''sports coverage of a general nature'', nothing notable. Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia that covers ''notable'' subjects. --ClubOranje
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)