Deletion of X-Men: Days of Future Past

Comment: mdash;Per , this would be a fairly unambiguous '''Delete''', but given the large amount of press surrounding the topic, as well as the fact the principal photography is only a month or so away, I |am compelled to override bureacracy and advocate leaving the article as and where it is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:IAR)

Comment: though I disagree that the reasoning is flawed.  has been a long-standing guideline over at WikiProject film, as all sorts of things can delay and completely derail even "sure-thing" productions. But I think this is a case where the  are clearly met, with significant coverage from a variety of reliable sources over an extended period of time. Even if the film never enters production, the project itself and its cancellation would still be notable (which is not always the case, hence the future film guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:GNG)

Comment: While  is set to prevent premature articles on planned films, we always need acknowledge 's instruction on how in-depth and persistent coverage of a topic gives us suitable topic notability... and how even NFF instructs that such persistent and in-depth coverage of a film's planning can make the topic notable even if unmade. And more, |policy itself tells us that future events may indeed be written of within these pages, if properly sourced. THIS topic merits being one of those acceptable |exceptions to the cautions of . We've had such exceptions before, and will again. This is one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:GNG||WP:CBALL||WP:FFCLARIFY)