Deletion of A. T. Powers

Comment: President of an association of 2,000 churches seems notable enough to me. And I do wish that people would stop quoting internet searches to prove why someone who was prominent in the 1950s isn't notable! Just have a quick think about why that might not be very useful! The fact he existed is verifiable. His notability is clear. Which guidelines or policies does this article not meet? Sadly the |verifiability policy is frequently misunderstood: All ''quotations'' and any ''material challenged or likely to be challenged'' must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation italics mine. Not ''every single item in the article'', as some people seem to believe. Which material in this article is controversial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: merge relevant details (if any) to American Baptist Association. Fails ,  and lacks RS. No sources for "Austin Toliver Powers" in google books, google scholar, or google news archive. The only "A. T. Powers" in google scholar are unrelated scientists who appear to be living. The two books (monographs) about him was published by Bogard Press, which was/is part of his organization. If this person was notable there should be sources, but there aren't. The bulk of the article is made up from a local history publication authored by the creator of the article. Simply put, delete per article's failure to "pass WP:V or WP:N
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)