Deletion of Stone Table

Comment: primary sourced article without substantial enough coverage to improve this into an encyclopedic article. There's no way to turn this into something that meets the , with substantial detailed coverage in third party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: after a respectful review of Daranios's sources. We already have an article about Aslan and the Christian overtones in his death, which is covered again in Religion in The Chronicles of Narnia. http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JBSSB/article/view/852/911 This article talks about Aslan's death as a story sequence and barely mentions the table at all. https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=bGUeWMeUUqoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=%22stone+table%22+narnia&ots=eesy8gWDQ4&sig=6xTTYUMId7qHnx0mj-JNzJnG1CY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=stone%20table&f=false This chapter is also about the moral and spiritual overtones (it's great stuff), but it barely focuses on the table, and only mentions it in passing. https://books.google.de/books?id=OcPjBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT16&dq=%22aslan%27s+how%22&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiiudCd5NvqAhWCCOwKHcaJB_QQ6AEwA3oECAQQAg#v=onepage&q=%22aslan's%20how%22&f=false  Official guides like this only ever give us a few in-universe details (and if you turn every entry in that guide into an article, you'd have hundreds of short articles with no real explanation or context). There's already two articles that talk about the religious overtones of Aslan's death and this starts to feel like |overkill
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK)

Comment: per . The amount and quality of sources listed by Daranios below are good enough to merit a keep (and the one above I referenced).  does not apply due to the analysis Daranios listed. The article should also be moved to Aslan's how, as Stone Table is too generic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PLOT)