Deletion of Turkish military false flag operations

Comment: Perfectly fits into our definition of |original research. {{U|TataofTata}}, you are saying that you are being "abused by pro-Turkey accounts" and calling other people who have voiced their opinion based on policies "biased", yet in the article you call the Istanbul pogrom "Constantinople riot". This event took place in 1955, decades after the Constantinople name was dropped and is therefore an  violation, and is also a MOS:EGG. I think this also shows a bit of where you stand towards Turkey
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Blatant violation of  and fits in with the user's disruptive pattern of |synthesising content to push their pro-PKK POV on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P%C4%B1narc%C4%B1k_massacre&diff=1021630667&oldid=1021621441 other articles. There are simply no sources that treat these as instances of a single, unified phenomenon, so the whole scope of the article is original research, and these are not even undisputed instances of false flag operations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)