Deletion of Tokyo Topless

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence that the site meets the notability requirements of , or that it can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: these assertions of notability would be stronger with |verifiable citations to some |reliable sources.  The website just cannot be used as a source for these assertions about itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Let's look at the nutshell of : ''Wikipedia should avoid articles about web sites that could be interpreted as advertising.'' I do not think that the current article could be so interpreted. ''For material published on the web to have its own article in Wikipedia, it should be notable and of historical significance.'' Notability and significance in its area have been claimed. ''Wikipedia articles about web content should use citations from reliable sources.'' Here's the problem, and I'll concede that it is not a trivial one. &para; The general tone of  suggests that it is a defense against (self-) promotion, and a promotional tone is lacking here. Now, even if I'm right so far (and others may well disagree), this doesn't mean that  shouldn't apply. However, it is a guideline and I'd suggest discretion in applying it. In its current state, the article is not satisfactory, but it also seems innocuous
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)