Deletion of Errol Sawyer (3rd nomination)

Comment: Can not see how the subject |notable and the author has failed to address the issues with sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Another promotional re-creation by another |SPA.  Sawyer still doesn't verifiably meet  and the article's sourcing remains weak.  The SPA argued for re-creation based on a book/collection and (for the first time) in-depth coverage, but the book had to be self-published and the coverage amounts to the book's foreword and two paragraphs on a critic's personal website, both of which one editor (apparently with some experience in these matters) in the DRV suggested were possibly pay-for-praise gigs.  None of this proves notability to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:CREATIVE)