Deletion of White guilt

Comment: per . &#10154
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: without ''sufficient'' citations, doubts about |original research cannot be satisfied
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: canonical |original research.  As noted above, a proper topic might be lurking underneath, but it's ''deep'' underneath.  Very ''very'' deep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: and cleanup now that a couple |reliable sources have been found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: as  as noted above.  There is potentially a good article hidden under the name, but again, as stated previously, it's hidden way down there and the article that exists is not a proper framework for such an article.  No one is suggesting protection, so if a ''potential topic'' exists those who feel it's out there somewhere are free to track it down and start anew - but I see no reason to keep this content and history
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: sourced, encyclopaedic.  From the comments, I gather the nominator is looking for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)