Deletion of Free Range Studios (2nd nomination)

Comment: with regret. VegaDark has done great work, but I still don't see enough |reliable sources that push the company over the line in . Specifically, of the references, the first two sources are interviews, which are not fact-checked. The third is an article written by one of the company founders. The fourth is commercial self-promotion. Five, seven, and ten are about The Meatrix, which we have covered. Eight is a press release with a single paragraph about one of their films. And eleven is their own site. That leaves only one reference, number six, a short article from the Epoch Times. With only one article that's actually about the company and from what I'd call a reliable source, to me this doesn't pass . It pains me to advocate deletion of such a nice-looking article, but unless more evidence of notability turns up, I don't see an alternative. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORP||WP:CORP)

Comment: Since the first AfD I've made major improvements to the article to make it much more NPOV and encyclopedic http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:VegaDark/Free_Range_Studios&diff=75394780&oldid=75387100 Diff, which were the main reasons for it's original deletion.  This company is to be considered notable based on the criteria at , please see my comments at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 September 12 on that.  The article still needs cleanup so feel free to make any edits you feel appropriate, I erred on the side of keeping info when I did my rewrite so there is probably still some info the article could do without
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)