Deletion of European University

Comment: I had a chance to look over the links posted by Qwpf above, especially the news article, and I'd say that this place fails .  It also doesn't seem to have generated sufficient scandal to pass the .  No accreditation and incidental mention in coverage of another for-profit education organization owned by the same parent company.  The most reliable information I can find about it comes from blogs where the posters complain about their experiences with it; that kind of blog is on the low end of the  spectrum
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: So, every two-bit operation that calls itself a university gets to avoid  because of a guideline that none of the editors of  have linked to as being a related page, and a poorly worded one at that?  The discussion page makes it clear that the only reason the guideline doesn't insist upon accreditation is because some religious institutions refuse to apply.  I think  applies here (I shiver to say it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:N||WP:IAR)

Comment: as documentating its lack of accreditation could well be a valuable service to prospective students. I think enough of us are watching this article to deal with  edits, and take |further action if needbe. Seems to me the way this article has been changed from an  through uncovering reliable sources of its lack of accreditation is an example of Wikipedia at its best. It appears that this institution has http://uniabroad.blogspot.com/2005/09/lawsuit-from-european-university.html used legal threats to suppress previous criticism. Now they've discovered they can't |control the content of the article, they're probably hoping it gets deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:ANI||WP:ADVERT||WP:OWN)