Deletion of Headshot

Comment: rather pointless article"'' &mdash; this seems very close to an |I don't like it argument, and not a valid reason for deletion.  ''"no sources and chances are there are none out there"'' &mdash; actually, chances are there http://news.google.com/news?ned=us&hl=en&q=%22headshot%22+gaming ''are'' sources out there. ''"more of a term or a definition then an actual article"'' &mdash; I just read the article, which is 6,233 bytes, and it sure looks like a lot more than a definition to me. ''"It also fails WP:N"'' &mdash; I think there are enough sources to show notability (see above link). In fact, it is such a notable concept in gaming that it is http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2007/02/7089.ars used as the name of an energy bar marketed to gamers. In conclusion, I am convinced this is a notable concept in terms of video gaming, and that there are reliable sources to show notability and support the statements in the article. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: and redirect to Head shot. Linguist's  is useless in itself. I waded through several sources which gave only trivial coverage. Many of them are mentions of Head shot. This situation is reflected in the article. It is merely a collection of commentaries on games in which it is possible to shoot someone in the head. All of it seems to violate  and . I agree that the article cannot be improved beyond a |a jargon guide entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:GOOGLE||WP:OR||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:NOTDICTIONARY)