Deletion of List of teen idols of the 2000s

Comment: the article Teen idol(another page with its own issues) contains some of the same list. The problem is that there will be way too much bias to maintain the page. It is also nearly impossible to meet the  requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: this is a valid topic and is worth keeping in some way shape, or form. With that being said, there are serious issues needing attention, most of which are articulated above. Anything which isn't |verifiable, is |original research, or |POV needs to be removed or refactored and the page needs a good lead-in section. If what remains is substantial enough for its own article, let it be, if not perhaps merging or making a sub-page of Teen Idol might be more appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: This article is completely an opinion. Some people could be viewed as an "idol" to some but an idiot to others. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NEUTRAL)

Comment: per my original statement on the prod (not that I'm quarreling with the conversion of this to an AfD), and the concurrence of Gtstricky. It's a mess, it's inherently a mess, and there's no way to make it work. Look up idoru sometime; the concept is unstable, and incredibly vulnerable to bias, not just cultural but |recentist bias as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (:WP:RECENTISM)