Deletion of Hubbard, Indiana

Comment: Presumed' but not guaranteed. It is not an exemption from notability requirements.  explicitly states that the notability of 'places' can be questioned. It makes a distinction between verifiability and notability. The sources noted above fail on notability. Nothing in the page implies notability. I don't really see this 'place' as being populated, for that matter. For the presumption to be valid, there should still be sources discussing the place. Those don't exist (or at least, have not been cited). Finally, we should also consider . How does this perfunctory type of page inform readers? That there is a name on a map, but nobody knows or cares what it is? Have a county page that lists the ghost corners and hamlets. Otherwise a reader could endlessly go through the infinite list of 'place names' of Indiana but never actually find anything out about any of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO||WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: WP:NGEO says that "geographical features meeting Wikipedia's General notability guideline (GNG) are presumed, but not guaranteed, to be notable" - meeting GNG means having "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - this place lacks significant coverage (mentioned in a list or appearing on a map is a passing reference, not significant coverage) -  says that places without legal recognition (like this unincorporated community) can be considered notable "given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources" -  also says that places may be notable "because notability encompasses their entire history", but this place has no notable history - just existing does not establish notability - the article does not meet , therefore delete - also, "Two sentences does not an encyclopedic article make," and "All articles that are only one or two sentences long should be either expanded or deleted." per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG||WP:2S)

Comment: or at least merge per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Meets . Not sure why one would nominate this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: This is a "populated, legally recognized place", per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Per {{u|Magnolia677}}, it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Meets . Yet another ridiculous nomination of places in Indiana for seemingly no valid reason
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)