Deletion of Pac-Man in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: note that |speedy close is not a valid option. This is a #DIR|collection of loosely associated items seeking to capture every reference to or appearance of Pac-Man, or a sound from Pac-Man, or something that in some way in the opinion of an editor resembles Pac-Man. The things on this list have no commonality beyond a reference of greater or lesser triviality to the video game. The list does not add to our knowledge or understanding of Pac-Man, the fiction from which the trivial references are drawn, their relation to each other or the real world. The only thing of any real significance here is the TV show, which already has its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:CSK||WP:NOT)

Comment: as per . It could use an introductory lead, but the subject is highly notable. The fact that Wikipedia isn't a pop culture magazine doesn't mean that we should ignore salient cultural influences entirely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:SENSE)

Comment: per . Unencyclopedic trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: As the person said above, use common sense! The subject ''is'' '''highly notable'''. As  says, extra stuff should be split of when making the original article too long. Putting in the oodles of cultural references into the pacman article would make it far too long
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: as a violation of #INFO.  These pop culture references have nothing in common other than the fact that they happen to include Pac-Man.  Unsourced listcruft that is thereby unnotable and trivia to boot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)