Deletion of Andrej Brodnik

Comment: on my opinion rendered above. Having read through the points raised here (sorry for being so dismissive to publications in proceedings, I thought that theoretical CS was like maths and that important results are published in journals, possibly in addition to publication in proceedings), I still don't see what distinguises him from the average academic. My own opinion on notability for academics corresponds roughly to , but in my reading none of the criteria in that proposal applies. However, my opinion is very '''weak''', especially because I think that if the consensus (or the lack thereof) on notability as evidence in AfD discussions on other subjects would be applied to academics, then the article would have been kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFTEST)

Comment: this guy has 15 publications http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/indices/a-tree/b/Brodnik:Andrej.html since 1994, not counting ones DBLP couldn't find.  The external link is sort of irrelevant: that's for mathematics geneology, which traces people through advisor/student relationships.  His home page is http://www.sm.luth.se/~brodnik/ here, but it's pretty out of date.  He publishes in Theoretical Computer Science where proceedings are much more acceptable than Jitse Niesen implies.  See  for some guidelines in development.  Note that this article has been around since 2002 and doesn't appear to be a vanity article.  I will attempt to improve the article somewhat
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFTEST)