Deletion of Daniel Spivak (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom.  To answer Powers, no, the various changes in NHOCKEY were not made to "target" any articles.  They were made to better reflect what every NSPORTS criteria is supposed to reflect: the likelihood of those who meet them to satisfy the GNG.  Since |Wikipedia isn't a vehicle for social engineering, we gave ''no'' shrift -- nor should we have -- to whether or not the NHOCKEY criteria was "discriminatory."  Those countries which aren't traditional hockey powers have a common factor: their media doesn't pay much attention to hockey, and so do not generate the degree of coverage necessary to meet the GNG.  Now if you think that this article ought to be saved, you have the means to do so ... just find significant coverage for the subject in multiple reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: not sufficient coverage. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NHOCKEY)