Deletion of China flu

Comment: to Coronavirus disease 2019.  It's a plausible redirect but we don't need a disambiguation page for other viruses, flus or diseases which have originated in China.  It's a term which as attracted a lot of attention, particularly in the U.S. e.g. realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/03/20/coronavirus_is_the_chinese_governments_curse_upon_the_world_142721.html this and https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-cure-for-the-chinese-flu-11580255213 this.  The disambiguation risks being a magnet for |POV editing but equally we can't ignore the fact that many people, whether you like it or not, refer to COVID-19 as such, and that the term has attracted media coverage.  Therefore, a redirect is the best bet
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)

Comment: None of the articles mention "China flu" and to suggest that the topics are otherwise known as "China flu" is  and is violates the  guidelines about what disambiguation pages are for. This is a very long way from "sensible disambiguation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:DAB)

Comment: Unnecessary disambiguation, per the guidance of . None of the pages are actually named China flu, or have easily conflated titles. Sure the subjects could be conflated, but then thats a case for an article discussing the history of flu pandemics, which already exists at Influenza pandemic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:DABNOT)

Comment: per . The phrase does not appear anywhere on WP, much less in the articles linked from the page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)