Deletion of Brian R. Morgenstern

Comment: per nom, Britishfinance and others. Subject does not meet the  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: does not meet . The arguments above that 'other Deputy Press Secretaries have articles so we should keep this one' are |not persuasive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Fails  – there is no significant coverage of the person outside of the press release-style article in Politico. (Hard not to notice that 8 of the 20 refs are just about Trump's COVID test results.) There's an interview in the purview of his job as deputy press secretary, and the rest are brief mentions/quotes and standard bio sheets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per all above — fails  and  — not a member of a legislative body, neither elected nor confirmed cabinet appointment. No significant publications '''''by''''' him. No significant publications '''''about''''' him.  The biggest mention in an independent article is about a blog post referring to the "United States of Gaymeria." Not sufficiently notorious, although I'm sure he'll do more such things in the future. Tiny number of ghits, so never made much impact in any of his prior positions either. As a lawyer, only 2 caselaw mentions. Heck, I've got more, and I'm not a lawyer. (But I've taken cases as a plaintiff or defendant as far as the state supreme court and the US 6th Circuit.) So far in his life, he's a nothingburger
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Per nom. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: The refs are really passing mentions that derive from his job (eg  for a deputy press secretary).  Don’t see any  by a quality RS on him as the main subject.  For BLPs going for GNG, you need at least one good SIGCOV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: the sources dug up by Mordbidthoughts clearly showcase that this person passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Having gone through the sources, they are just  (i.e. passing mentions consistent with his job); I could find no independent quality RS doing a  piece on him as the subject.  A case of his Wikipedia article being a major part of his notability, whereas it should be the other way around
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)