Deletion of Tourism in London

Comment: OMG, if this was an article for a company, I'd have it deleted for being  or . If there's a place in Wikisphere, it's at Wikivoyage, not here. Indeed the topic should be a notable one, but little of the content is relevant to our context, and we may as well start again from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:HOWTO)

Comment: We must always keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. According to policy, |Wikipedia is not a travel guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)

Comment: as article bluntly violates  right now. Deleting, redirecting/merging, or keeping this won't make much of a difference since the article needs to literally be rewritten from scratch to meet Wikipedia standards and guidelines, so overhauling an existing article won't be easier than creating a new one. Deleting this without prejudice against recreation might be better than keeping it in hopes that someone will fix it, which will not happen overnight nor will be completed in a quick fashion, but hey, if someone can do that before the AfD closes, I am willing to change my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)