Deletion of Australian Retriever

Comment: Fails .  "Australian Retriever" produces http://www.google.com/search?q=Australian+Retriever&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&tbm=nws&source=hp&q=%22Australian+Retriever%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=e0320be3d2b0e926&biw=2138&bih=1029 no Google New search hits.  A http://www.google.com/search?q=Australian+Retriever&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22Australian+Retriever%22&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=ySIPTqOmHOXs0gGWoaGRDg&ved=0CBsQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=e0320be3d2b0e926&biw=2138&bih=1029 Google News Archive search produces 8 hits, none of which are coverage of the breed at all; only mentions of or coverage of dogs who are Australian Retrievers (lost/found dog, describing the dog of an owner who was interviewed during coverage of an event).  It seems obvious to me that there's some coverage out there that assumes that the breed exists but I don't feel that this breed (or any designer breed without significant coverage) can have  applied to support an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IAR)