Deletion of Alcor Life Extension Foundation

Comment: Seems to meet |the general notability criteria pretty easily; there is substantial coverage from a range of independent sources included in the article, per . I also cannot see that the article is written in a particularly promotional tone - the sections on policies and procedures and on membership are perhaps a little promotional but not terribly so, in my opinion, and there is a substantial section on criticism and controversies. If their employees should use the article for promotional purposes, that can be fixed without deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The page has 45 sources and it is easy to find more such as this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/technology-42835119/cryonics-your-body-preserved-for-future-revival BBC coverage.  The number of employees is irrelevant per . The staff head count at Wikipedia used to be a half  – just one part-timer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTBIGENOUGH)