Deletion of Entelo

Comment: fails  and . A mix of paid for marketing content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Nominator clearly failed to follow . Easily passes . Please see these sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per the findings of 4meter4. Passes GNG 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, including the references listed above. The criteria for establishing notability as per NCORP excludes churnalism and many of the references were clear cases of such. We require Independent Content - that is ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.'' Turning to the references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)