Deletion of Highest-valued currency unit

Comment: Almost all the arguments given for deleting this are either incorrect or invalid. It is NOT original research, and per  Google search results are not a valid argument in deletion discussions. And the analogy at the bottom is incorrect and inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)

Comment: No sources discuss the concept; by that definition, it's not notable. It may be interesting and useful, but neither of those is a |valid argument. '''Ten Pound Hammer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: I had a look around for other articles that list currencies, and it seems like the info can just be tacked on as a new column to List of circulating currencies, perhaps? Also, the article is a clear case for deletion if you bring up : Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, but as I said, I'd be happier seeing the cost of one unit in USD as a column on an already existing table
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This article is primarily a list of exchange rates, which (in addition to probably breaking ) fluctuate constantly. Unless updated continually (like the currency exchange database which serves as the article's only source) this information will consistently run the risk of becoming obselete. It looks like the numbers haven't been updated in almost two weeks either, including the 3 or so days it was locked for edit warring. Hoping this AfD discussion will be more civil than big sections of that article's talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK)