Deletion of Kai Z Feng

Comment: Offline sources are certainly admissible if you cite publication name, year, issue, etc., but these must be actual newspaper articles ''about'' Feng, not just instances of his work being printed and a photo credit being given to him. |Notability, to a first approximation, means being discussed in the news or in academia, not having your work published. The fact of his possibly being the only Chinese fashion photographer commissioned by both Vogue and Harper's Bazaar is mildly interesting, but can't really count as the basis of notability if |reliable sources haven't actually ''noted'' said fact. Basically, if someone is not discussed by reliable sources, then pretty much any observations you make about their body of work (besides purely statistical ones) will inevitably be |original research. Went through the 62 Chinese GHits (not 11) and didn't see anything that would help. http://www.google.com.hk/search?q=%E9%A6%AE%E5%BF%97%E5%87%B1&num=30&complete=1&hl=zh-TW&safe=active&start=60&sa=N
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: There are not verifiable sources to establish the notability of this photographer according to wikipedia requirements of .  A paragraph about him in Vogue is not sufficient, nor is his name as a credit to a photograph
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)