Deletion of Abdellatif Aboukoura

Comment: Fails  as there is no significant coverage on the subject. I can't find a single indepth article about the subject and none has been presented in this Afd.  does not supersede the general notability guideline, passing  only means that there supposedly enough significant coverage on the subject for it to pass the general notability guideline and thus merit an article in Wikipedia. The subject still has to have significant coverage which Aboukoura does not have
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: This is ridiculous. You know what, let's get rid of  and . They're basically useless if everything is going to boil back down to . Like, it literally makes no sense to have either of those if we are not going to discuss the nuance of the situation and just boil it all down to GNG. Forget debating consistently on what makes a |fully-professional league, forget having standards on . What's the point? A player in the Uganda Premier League would be notable if they had considerable coverage despite playing in a non-professional league while a player in the South African Premier Division would be deleted if they made 1 appearance despite playing in a league deemed fully-professional... so what is the point? You tell me. I would get if Aboukoura was 28 years old, his only  season was at the age of 18 and he has since stopped playing professionally, I get it. But he is 16, he just started his career in a fully-professional league, the second top league in the United States, and is still an active player in his club's roster after the first game of the season. We can safely presume his notability based on that and we have in the past in discussions like this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG||WP:FPL||WP:NSPORT||WP:FPL)

Comment: He is young player that made his debut in Loudoun United FC|Loudoun United's first game of the season. He meets  and is just starting his career. Generally, these players have been given more leeway when it comes to GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: This individual hasn't been noticed by any significant secondary sources; they do not magically become notable because they stepped onto a pitch (and were entered into some database(s)). If this individual was truly notable for appearing in a certain game, it would have been reported in sources and they would pass the GNG. NFOOTY is a presumption of notability, but as Kusma said above, the presumption here is false - the individual is simply not (yet) |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Spiderone. this all seems quite  to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON, no significant coverage, does not pass . The presumption of notability made by  appears to be demonstrably false here. List at  if he turns out to be the next Messi
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:BTWN)