Deletion of Titania McGrath

Comment: not enough coverage in |reliable sources to meet . There are some blogs and opinion pieces, but no actual journalism. The book she claims to have written has not been published yet, so  doesn't apply
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Per {{U|Praxidicae}}. Subject does not meet  and the sources used are not reliable per .  Most are questionable and self-published sources and inherently unreliable.  Editors citing "potential" for growth plainly do not understand 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Can I remind editors that Titania McGrath is a ''fictitious'' character, and so arguments based on BLP policy, such as  need to be applied with caution
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: and fight lazy and uninformed deletionism everywhere it spreads. The people posting delete clearly did not bother to do so much as a Google search before they asserted that there were no RS sources for her. And the one that did proceeded to whittle away at the sources they found with irrelevant objections that are not germane to a deletion decision. Even worse, one even point blank stated their |bias against her. (And the fact that the book hasn't been released yet is a shibboleth for notability? So what that implies is that ''after'' the book is released, a magic event will occur that will suddenly make her notable. What?) Come on, seriously Wikipedia. Come on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)