Deletion of Ralph W. Moss (writer)

Comment: per DGG's excellent sources. I do think he has it. Moss has written several very widely reviewed, notable, books. We normally consider that sufficient to make an article about the author. This isn't "inherited notability" in the sense of  where the subject didn't do anything to become notable, books aren't relatives, they're his professional output. Moss is an author; writing these books are what he does. Writing books that are this widely read and reviewed is a sign of notability in his field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)

Comment: Per notability guidelines for people, section , multiple sources can be utilized to establish topic notability. Paywalled book reviews are valid despite being paywalled: see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:PAYWALL)

Comment: nom did not execute ; DGG had to do it for nom. The author's work is notable, author is notable, sources exist. ''(I've removed the misleading double blank lines above, which imply some sort of break in discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)