Deletion of Joachim Cronman (3rd nomination)

Comment: for lack of ''significant coverage'' in independent sources. For "keep" voters who may not have read , it may be time to do so, and to ponder the meaning of those words. Passing mentions in genealogical directories are not a substitute for the depth of coverage we demand. I'd also suggest a close look at deleting Fritz Cronman
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The renomination is vexatiously disruptive per .  In any case, our |deletion policy requires more than a quick skim before starting a deletion debate.  The nominator should please engage with articles at their talk page before coming here.  As for the substantive issue, the article has reasonable promise and no satisfactory reason has been presented to suppress further work.  The article should be retained in accordance with our |editing |policies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:PRESERVE)