Deletion of Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy

Comment: You yourself said ''If you can verify enough information to write a non-stub section about the distinct reception of a video game remake, as well as a non-stub section about its distinct game development or design''... the article has such a thing with a potentially vast reception section due to the many, many distinct reviews of the Trilogy collection. I see this as a clearly distinct game from the Nintendo GBA/DS versions, with the art having been totally remade and gameplay features added. Also, this qualifies as  as I can never imagine this actually being deleted, even if it was redirected
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:WRONGFORUM)

Comment: due to coverage in reliable secondary sources separate of the original games. This version has attracted a reception of its own and is easily cited. Not that metacritic should be the only standard but it shows numerous publications treating it as its own entity. There are sufficient distinct aspects about this topic. It can't hurt to  how the articles relate to each other through headings and blue links
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPROVE)