Deletion of Michael Patrick

Comment: Practically all of the content of the article was added by s, which on these types of article always makes me suspicious that someone in the office of the businessperson has written and updated the article over time.  Substantively, the subject has done nothing that would make him notable among attorneys. New York has no end of law firm partners who specialize in intellectual property, have written articles in law journals, and who have been on CNBC.  Those facts don't make him notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: as written. This appears to be an exercise in attempting to construct an appearance of notability by inheritance from tertiary relationships with notable matters. I also note that the article was created by a , which is never a good sign for a topic of commercial interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)