Deletion of Fuckpaypal.net

Comment: Only a regular delete;  is not reason to speedy-delete, it has likely claims of fame (2600 article, lawsuit, etc) and it's not an attack page (The ''subject'' may be as annoying as imaginable, as long as the ''article'' is not abusive). I don't think this qualifies as G11 blatant ad either. I think this thing should be kind of chainsaw-trimmed and put to PayPal#Criticisms|Criticisms of PayPal or something. Probably not famous enough for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: If you want to stick to  to a T, you need multiple Non-trivial sources, which means even if 2600 is notable (which I think it is, go look at the subscriber base size) it is still only one non-trivial source. It was linked to on slashdot in a post not dedicated to it. Thus it only has 1 non-trivial source. I'm assuming wikipedia policies which refer to multiple sources mean more than one. Since it doesn't have MULTIPLE non-trivial sources it doesn't meet . Too bad since I would've preferred to keep it otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)