Deletion of 2020 Ontario nuclear incident alert

Comment: per . Or draftify, if we're feeling generous, on the off chance that this generates sustained coverage. But I highly doubt this is going to have a lasting impact. I live in Ontario and people have mostly forgotten about it a few hours later. The Hawaii and Connecticut false alarms caused panic because they stated that there was imminent danger and urged residents to evacuate. In this case the emergency alert stated {{tq|There has been no abnormal release of radioactivity from the station... People DO NOT need to take any protective actions at this time.}} People turned it off, went back to sleep and maybe made a joke about it on Twitter. Not a notable event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: and '''redirect''' to Pickering Nuclear Generating Station#2020 nuclear incident alert). Wikipedia is  and this incident has no clear established notability warranting its own page yet. If it reaches that point then a new page can easily be created, but because this is already being covered under the Incidents section of the plant’s page and there’s insufficient material to justify its own page yet, that’s the best way to handle for now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as , words at Incidents#Pickering Nuclear Generating Station|Pickering Nuclear Generating Station is enough, of concern are some of the above words - "the event happened less than four hours ago", exactly why the article shouldn't have been created, and "Premature to delete", no, this was premature to create
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Pickering Nuclear Generating Station, per  and . This did happen, and is obviously notable enough to warrant mention ''somewhere'' in Wikipedia — but it doesn't clear the high bar needed to warrant its ''own'' standalone article ''separately'' from being discussed in the article on Pickering itself. Apart from possibly an internal adjustment of the emergency alert procedures to reduce the likelihood of a repeat occurence, this is not going to have any enduring long-term effects for the purposes of needing its own dedicated article. If the existence of sources automatically exempted a topic from having to have a ''reason'' why an encyclopedia article was ''warranted'', we would have to keep an article about every house fire that ever happened
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YT)

Comment: per nom. Unlikely to have a lasting effect and |you can't subscribe to Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)