Deletion of David Davis for Freedom campaign

Comment: Davis precipitated a parliamentary by-election by resigning, and this is his campaign platform. There is no evidence that it is anything but an election manifesto. Davis is merely using the campaign to turn the election into a pseudo-referendum, and that to me suggests that the article should be merged to his personal article, with some mention in the Haltemprice by-election article, whilst being in keeping with . I would lean towards delete, as |WP is not a soapbox, nor is it #NEWS|the news. Coverage of a newsworthy event (the by-election) does not make the campaign particularly |notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:SOAP||WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: The issue of it being notable in 6 months is not really relevant to this discussion. The question should be "is it notable now?" Problems with notability in the future should be resolved as they appear. The one-sided argument issue is a little more concerning though as there is a strong likelihood that this article may become a |soap box if editors are not careful. If this discussion resolves to keep the article then
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)