Deletion of List of fictional diseases

Comment: as it happens, this aticle is not a lot summary--as even the title makes evident. And the link for Not inherited does not mention that term. The true link is  which is an essay, not policy or guideline. There is no rule prohibiting this sort of article or this content. And. per WP:N, only the general subject must be notable, not the individual items. They just have to be relevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Could someone (or closing admin) please check for ivilty issues on this page. We can disagree and remain civil if pleasant just isn't possible
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Plot elements are notable when they have "'''received substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources'''" that "'''describes the real-world aspects of the concept'''".  I'm not sure "since when" this has been part of , but does the timeframe really matter?  We're not in the business of cataloging plot devices; truely notable items will qualify for their own articles, which can be serviced by a category... the rest should be nuked.  Notability is not inhereted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)