Deletion of Morgz

Comment: the nominator mentioned this AfD to me on my talk page during a separate conversation. The page is currently written promotionally, and his only coverage which might pass  is negative  for trying to get teenagers to gamble. Of the sources on the page, the Sun doesn't count, and most of the mentions are extremely trivial (though Polygon does call him one of the largest youtubers) except for the gambling thing. This may be overly sensitive or , but I would delete or at least draftify on  grounds
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROMO)

Comment: Seems to have started promoting gambling to underage children via fat loot boxes, so thrown off the site. News articles in the London Times, Sun, and Express means the article passes . Also on Kotaku
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Fails .  For a media-BLP, not one single main UK media outlet with an article on the subject (never mind several per ).  The Sun is junk and not a suitable reference for WP.  Can't even find a reference to the subject in the DailyMail (which is still low-grade, but if they are not picking up a UK-based "media celebrity", that says a lot about how little-notable he is).   Youtube hits are junk (claim of a billion views and no mention even in the DailyMail – lol; I am surprised to see WP editors quoting this).  The adverse press from running gambling ads on his site do not make him inherently notable, and in each case his name is just listed as an example with others. BLP's should not have to "contrive" or "reach" for sources of WP notability, especially when they are media-BLPs who therefore should have lots of good RS noting them; it should be very straightforward.  For him it is not there, because he is not WP notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The  has been met, plenty of reliable sources give this person significant coverage.  It doesn't matter where the coverage is good or bad, that has nothing to do with the notability guidelines.  Hitler has nothing but bad coverage in the media, that doesn't mean we delete his article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)