Deletion of Duplicate Record Detection

Comment: I completely reject the argument that it is too long. |Wikipedia is not paper and should go into as much depth as anyone wants to write, as long as it's based on sources.  It is true that the tone of the article is not encyclopedic, but that's never been a reason for deletion, only for cleanup.  The only reason I think it should be deleted, and it's a big reason, is the copyright status. I hope the author gives proof he can republish this under GFDL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PAPER)

Comment: Without easy access to any of the sources, I can't confirm |OR. However, the fact that this was copied word for word from a thesis or essay, whether or not permission is given is a problem. First, it is written in first person, using "we" and describing it as a paper or essay. Also, it's too long; it's perfect for a long research paper, but encyclopedia articles, while comprehensive, should only give an overview of the topic while this goes very much in depth, over 120KB (recommended max is 32-50). This would probably better on Wikiversity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)