Deletion of The list of famous bastards

Comment: In order to be kept, the name would have to be changed since "bastard" has a strong connotation which violates NPOV, and the list would be referenced.  However, I'm not so sure that the list doesn't constitute 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: I can see no encyclopaedic merit in this article. Inevitably some kind soul will add a living person to the list, feeling will be hurt, legal action, etc etc. Also appears be contrary to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per above. Serves no encyclopedic purpose, even if renamed, and fails . That the article may be "interesting" is not encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Violates  as it requires a POV judgement as to who is "famous", plus it's completely unsourced. If this article is kept it MUST be renamed without the "The" article. I would have moved the article myself but I can't since it's now in the AFD pipeline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The list is encyclopedic, but needs |referencing. ''The'' has to be removed from the title per |the naming conventions, and the term bastard is too ambiguous. Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aecis|A
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NC)