Deletion of Brad Troemel (4th nomination)

Comment: Not notable yet ...though I question why an editor/editors are registering new accounts to repeatedly nominate this article. But the article still doesn't stand up to scrutiny, despite the enthusiastic work by a Wikipedian-in-Residence no new coverage has surfaced. It fails  and . ''None'' of the biographical information is cited to independent sources. We have one lengthy review of an exhibition of work by the collective "JOGGING", of which Troemel is a part. But one review of a group show does not equate to notability of Troemel or his artwork. The lengthy interview in ''The Daily Dot'' is obviously Troemel speaking at length about his own work (evidently not a reliable secondary source). There is a short intro in the Huffington Post about his Etsy store, and then another lengthy interview. As the nominator says, Troemel didn't exhibit at MoMA PS1, he was a speaker at a book launch. I think we need to recognise that self-publicists on the internet can give themselves the mistaken feeling that they are widely known and important. There's still little evidence that Troemel has been widely noticed. Bear in mind I dislike recommending articles about artists for deletion, but this guy is young, active throughout the internet age, working in the middle of a major US city, so if there is any significant coverage ''about'' him it is likely to be available online
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST)