Deletion of MS Australia

Comment: MS Australia is the peak body for multiple sclerosis advocacy and research in Australia. They feature regularly in television news broadcasts https://7news.com.au/the-morning-show/world-ms-day-tim-ferguson-partners-with-ms-australia-for-a-new-app-to-help-patients-stay-connected--c-1066896 and print newspapers https://www.sheppnews.com.au/news/2021/06/29/4557477/shepparton-runners-invite-community-to-join-fight-against-ms, not to mention online https://www.financialstandard.com.au/news/ms-sufferer-fights-comminsure-definition-173009642 where their representatives are cited as technical experts and advocates. Arguably, some of their events like the MS Read-athon https://my.education.nsw.gov.au/news/latest-news/bookworms-dig-deep-for-a-special-teacher and the May 50k are notable in their own right. The view held by MS Australia with regard to Government policy is considered significant enough that MS Australia's CEO is the most prominent person cited in a number of technical and editorial articles https://www.hospitalhealth.com.au/content/clinical-services/news/new-ms-treatment-available-on-pbs-414563014, including in relation to international research https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/study-finds-nearly-one-in-five-misdiagnosed-as-hav. Even second and third-level MS Australia functionaries (like individual program coordinators) are cited ''because'' they represent MS Australia https://www.sbs.com.au/news/most-australians-don-t-know-ms-symptoms-poll-shows. I accept that  is challenging here because searching for "MS Australia" gets so many seemingly unrelated hits... but I would suggest most of them are actually related and loop back to MS Australia; coverage is simply that voluminous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per Stalwart111 and Aoziwe, and per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)