Deletion of Death of Phillip Walters

Comment: In accord with the principles that Wikipedia is not a news registry service and Wikipedia is not a memorial. The stories of 100% of police deaths in the line of duty will be reported in multiple newspapers.  tells us to weigh whether the actual content of these reports is truly of lasting import or but another breathlessly reported news incident churned out as part of the commercial media's daily news cycle. This is, tragically, one death of an endless series, in no way more remarkable or socially significant than any other. My condolences to the family
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: there are multiple sources, including BBC News, the Evening Standard, The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian. He seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM)

Comment: as per  . As Carrite correctly points out, such deaths will continue to occur. If this still gets significant coverage in 6 months we can revisit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Sad story, but does not meet the notability requirements of .  For an event to be notable, it must be a precedent for another action, having in depth press coverage that is not passing and/or have widespread geographical ramifactions. This event appears to be rather isolated, with press coverage just after the event itself and in relation to the subsequent trial of the criminals.  The article is about an event, not a victim, so  doesn't apply, but if it did, I believe there would still be a big question whether the victim is notable, given the passing nature of the media coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:VICTIM)