Deletion of Australian federal election, 2010

Comment: I don't know anything about the Philippines electoral system, but I'd suggest that |the existence of other stuff isn't a good reason to keep the article we are discussing here. The presence of a reasonably detailed Philippines article doesn't address any of the problems raised with the Australian article ovr the course of this debate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: I was set to say "delete", but this comment by Chuq gave me pause. Australian federal election, 2007 was created on October 11, 2004 (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_federal_election%2C_2007&oldid=6541354), and ''that'' was pure |crystal-ballery. The current version of Australian federal election, 2010 is already far superior, containing as it does properly referenced information about the latest possible date of the election, and also the list of senators up for re-election. Oh, furthermore, for precedence sake, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. presidential election, 2008. Deletion discussion held more than three and a half years prior to the election. The state of that article at that time was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_presidential_election%2C_2008&oldid=11217548
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: but rename to Next Australian federal election. This is the next national election to be held in Australia adn there is verifiable information in the article on when the election must be held by and which Senators will be facing re-election. It therefore meets  as an event almost certain to take place and with everything in the article being verifiable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)