Deletion of Selman Kadria

Comment: as per rationale given by IJA. The nominator is currently trying to delete or rename without consensus a series of articles just because he doesn't like them, clear 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDL)

Comment: An article created by a Sockmaster is not a valid reason for deletion. Claiming an article is POV is also not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be a case of . This is a valid notable article which is referenced appropriately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDL)

Comment: Without reliable sources, the article makes no claim of notability and has none. Although the article doesn't qualify under , it makes sense to nominate POV articles written by a now-blocked crank
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G5)