Deletion of Killing of Aiden Leos

Comment: per  or possibly '''Draftify''' per . It's too early to tell if there is lasting significance beyond routine news coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Wikipedia:GNG is a prerequisite, and can not be brought as the only reason to include myriads of  articles: "'''Presumed''' means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information."&nbsp;•&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: does not meet  ie. does not have "... lasting major consequences or affects a major geographical scope, or receives significant non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: per  and . I took the liberty of looking up some sources. The https://www.gunviolencearchive.org/ Gun Violence Archive shows that, so far in 2021, over 19,000 people (not giving an exact number, as it unfortunately changes every day) have been killed by gun violence, and another 16,000+ injured. Of these, 131 of those killed were children between the ages of 0 and 11, as were 314 of those injured. In a typical year, somewhere between 600 and 700 kids of this age are killed by gun violence. To add onto that, https://brandongaille.com/21-startling-road-rage-facts-and-statistics/ 37% of "road rage" incidents involve a firearm, and over 200 murders in a 7-year study period have been associated with firearms. So what makes one of those 600 annual gun deaths notable, or one of these 200 road rage deaths? Has this shooting led to any mass protests, like Murder of George Floyd|George Floyd? Led to TV movies and a career change for his parents, like Murder of Adam Walsh|Adam Walsh? Led to new laws, like Murder of Rachel Hoffman|Rachel Hoffman? Was it even under mysterious circumstances, like JonBenet Ramsay? I don't believe so, for any of the above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NCRIME)

Comment: The number of people publicly murdered with guns in the United States is so high that Wikipedia article proposals for such cases tend to not meet our inclusion criteria for reasons described in our general-purpose guidance at Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill and Wikipedia:I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground. I agree that many of the sources for this topic circulating in off-wiki media are recycled press releases, which we do not count as additional media coverage. Journalism capacity in the United States off-wiki does not keep up with all the shootings, but in this case, we do have several rounds of media coverage here on the killing itself. The first round are shooting details including driving, going to kindergarten, and the escape of the accused killers. We have more coverage about a reward building to capture suspects, then another set of coverage for the memorial. After the arrests there was biographical profiling for the suspects. Whereas typical such events only produce one round of media coverage, here we already have several and I expect that within 2 years there will be a trial and result which will generate more coverage. Here are articles from difference sources and times which I assert makes this topic pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: at least for now. This incident has clearly received a far greater level of coverage than most incidents of a similar type, and there is already coverage distinct from the original incident, as can be seen https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/aiden-leos-6-year-old-killed-in-road-rage-shooting-to-receive-plaque-at-oc-zoo/2615271/ here. Perhaps coverage will be limited to one news cycle, but I find such an outcome to be highly unlikely, and I reckon this article would be more likely to pass  than not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)

Comment: per . I'm not seeing lasting significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . Also doesn't meet  and . The event is tragic, but it has no lasting effect which is an important factor with these types of articles. Having a facility named after the child is not a lasting effect in my opinion. A lasting effect is something that influences a large number of people, brings important changes and changes the way people think. It's perfectly described in . So for now it's a delete for me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:NCRIME||WP:LASTING)