Deletion of Bajgorë

Comment: Notable only for being associated with the Kosovo Liberation Army. Despite popular myth, the concept of "inherent notability" is not recognized by any policy or guideline, and there is no exemption from  for geographic locations. This village does not merit an individual article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: consensus has shown that all verifiable places are notable, per |common outcomes. Glancing at a quick Google News search,http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Bajgora%22+%22Mitrovica%22&um=1&sa=N&start=10 there are some notable events verifying the existance of this place. This village is not unremarkable, as shown byhttp://www.elmundo.es/1999/01/09/europa/09N0046.htmlhttp://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/bg/features/setimes/newsbriefs/2002/09/020912-GEORGI-012http://www.b92.net/eng/news/crimes-article.php?yyyy=2007&mm=02&dd=03&nav_id=39420http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/kosovo/undword-14.htmhttp://www.nrc.nl/geslotendossiers/giro_555_kosovo/reisverslag/article1640953.ece/Nederlands_geld_heeft_kinderen_van_Kosovo_niet_geholpen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Have to back up Scjessey on this one: there is no such thing as inherent notability, and there is no reason to believe that all towns are notable. There is no exclusion for towns in , and towns need to meet the same notability standards as any other topic: direct and detailed coverage in multiple independent sources. The most that anyone has shown for this town are passing mentions. Anyone care to point at two direct and detailed examinations of the town in question
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Just want to emphasize that this position has no support in 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)