Deletion of Armin Shams

Comment: Does not appear to meet rof
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Google Scholar shows zero cites for this graduate student at University of Manchester. Are there any cites on WoS or Scopus? Appears to fail all categories of rof. Does not seem to have achieved notability yet on above basis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Only a PhD student, clearly fails . Per , student-level awards do not qualify for establishing academic notability and having one paper published in an obscure journal does not make one notable either. Special:Contributions/63.118.138.73|63.118.138.73
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: If the work of the subject is as important as is claimed by the one or two |spas who are alone in urging keeps for this article then, in the course of time, the work will be recognised by enough citations, awards etc. to give it |notability. However, this time does not appear to have yet arrived. In the meanwhile, the |spas may wish to consider whether their importunate pleading, which is clearly doomed to failure, may be a cause of embarrassment to the subject of the article and to the institutions that he is associated with
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:SPA||WP:notability)

Comment: There is a lot of text here by a small number of people who are insufficiently familiar with mathematical profession,  and many prior discussions on notability of academic mathematicians.  The standard for inclusion here is certainly higher than can be met by the average university professor.  The candidate needs to be distinguished in their field, i.e., clearly above average, which the guidelines seek to quantify in various ways.  The current candidate does not yet have a Ph.D., contrary to what the article seems to suggest.  Moreover, in the field of mathematics he has a single publication.  Here is the MathSciNet review
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Most of the claims of notability in the article seems to be resting on theorem 1 of his paper in an obscure Ukrainian journal, which claims an upper bound of O(n/log&nbsp;n) for the prime gaps near a number ''n''. The prime gap problem is an important one, but this is just a bad result: not only is it is far weaker than what is conjectured about how large those gaps can be (see Cramér's conjecture) but it is also far weaker than upper bounds of the form O(n^c) for 1/2&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;c&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;1 that have been known since the 1930s (see Prime gap#Upper bounds). The other theorem in the paper does not seem to have a lot of importance. But since we're not really judging importance here, but notability, we should look at how many other people have taken note of it: no citations in Google scholar. There is really no way to judge his contributions to Knuth's AOCP, but Knuth is the only actual author of that work, and other minor contributions are not enough for notability here. As for : he's a Ph.D. student, and as with most Ph.D. students has not yet demonstrated any independent notability of a type that would pass . There are a reasonable number of citations in Google scholar for authors named "A. Shams" but they don't match the publications listed on http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~shamsbaa/ his web page so I'm pretty sure they're not his
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: spurious claims of notability debunked by David Eppstein and others; fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Clearly fails , as already explained
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)