Deletion of Planets of the Hainish Cycle

Comment: secondary sources satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:ALLPLOT,  indiscriminate list with a heavy amount of original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:INUNIVERSE)

Comment: Random collection of mostly unreferenced  elements that are never discussed in in-depth in non-fiction works. The keep voters claim 'there are good sources' but refuse to discuss them in detail or just vote 'per previous keep argument'. Closing admin should keep in mind AfD=/=vote. This kind of fancruft belongs on wikia, ex. https://hippie.wikia.org/wiki/Planets_of_the_Hainish_Cycle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: Entirely in-universe plot summary using almost entirely primary sources.  Even the couple of non-primary sources being used here are insufficient to pass the  for different reasons - one appears to just be part of a fansite, the others, while mentioning a couple of planets as part of their summaries do not discuss the set in any sort of depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)