Deletion of UFC 36 (2nd nomination)

Comment: This would be an article to potentially keep if it weren't for its sad state.  It cites only a single reference, and that is to show that Mir's submission over Williams was a "Mir lock" and not another kind of submission hold.  The article is at least half pure fight results.  Therefore, it fails  which requires that "notable games should have well-sourced prose".  If the article had its prose fleshed out to discuss the background of the event, what occurred during the event, and the after-effects of the event, then I would have little issue !voting keep.  Otherwise, in it's current state, I would merge it into an omnibus article such as ''2002 in UFC events
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: Fails the  policy, the article only has one source, a look for others only turns up |routine news coverage about the time of the event. The assertion that it has lasting effect due to the championship fight is firstly not backed up by any sources and secondly if you read the sportsevent criteria the intent is clear it is referring to a once a year final game such as "''2009 Stanley Cup Finals, or 2009 All-Ireland Senior Football Championship Final, or Super Bowl XLIII, or 2006 UEFA Champions League Final''" and not one off winner takes all fights which in 2012 UFC held some 15+ such events. However like TreyGeek and Kevlar suggest content could be merged into a "''2002 in UFC events''" article, but as one does not exist can't !vote for that however no prejudice to a restore for the purpose of a munge and redirect to such an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: and expand - Meets  as the event determined two champions of a http://www.mmajunkie.com/news/22821/ufc-earns-pro-sports-league-of-the-year-nomination-with-nba-nhl-nfl-mls top league. Also, nine past or future UFC champions (including two UFC Hall of Fame members) competed on this card, therefore passing .  does not apply, it exists to prevent people from copying from their newspapers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:EFFECT||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: Between the two championship fights (which I would argue make this notable per ) and the steroid controversy, you can make a good argument for this event being non-routine.  The article needs expansion, but that's not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)