Deletion of AMX-104 R-Jarja

Comment: Which policy or guideline are you referencing to support your argument beyond 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: to the last few strong keepers.  makes it clear that minor characters, places, and concepts should be merged into a list. I'm happy to apply the same policy to these mobile suits. RX-78 Gundam seems to be the equivalent of the Enterprise or X-Wing, and is definitely worth keeping independent. If you can show me that some other mobile suits are significant within the series, I'd consider keeping them. But you can't have 100 articles about 100 mobile suits and tell me that every single one is critical to the series. Someone who actually knows about Gundam needs to explain which ones are major, and which ones are minor. The best place to explain that is in the articles themselves
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: does not assert notability with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)|encyclopedic treatment per #Fiction in Wikipedia. Since this only has in-universe POV, a transfer to the http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Gundam Wiki is acceptable but a merge into Wikipedia would go against #IINFO (plot summary and video game guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION||WP:NOT)

Comment: per nominator.  Absolutely useless and empty articles that do not contain ''anything'' apart from |in-universe fake specifications. I strongly concur with nominator's opinion "no reason why all these random suits of armor from a fictional series should have their own articles".  Further, I strongly agree with all delete votes appearing above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)