Deletion of Criticism of George W. Bush

Comment: The nominator has used the same "argument" for deletion as I have on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Vladimir Putin. To use a further argument I have also used on the VVP article, and this is in the context of the VVP, but is also relevant to this article...As people are now saying that '''Criticism of...''' articles should have both positive and negative points mentioned, isn't this still just a POVFORK? Think about it, take, Criticism_of_Vladimir_Putin#Foreign_policy. This does not belong in a criticism article but in Vladimir_Putin#Foreign_policy, which has its own article Foreign policy of Vladimir Putin. Criticism_of_Vladimir_Putin#Domestic_policy should be in a section of Vladimir Putin called '''Domestic policy''', and perhaps have its own article Domestic policy of Vladimir Putin. (something that I am currently working on ideas for). '''ALL''' of these issues should be covered in their separate sections which do or don't currently exist, not in a POVFORK; by ensuring that the information is included in the relevant sections of the main article (which I will attest to, all information in this article is present in Vladimir Putin), this is the only way that coherence can be achieved and further . This goes not only for this article, but it is my opinion on '''ALL''' criticism of articles. Additionally, and unfortunately, these criticism articles are not written in the context of academic criticism (which by definition covers all sides), but in the context of basic criticism, they are not meant to be NPOV. Once relevant material is merged into relevant articles, it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Material is relevant, but splitting off criticism into separate articles is not warranted. Some of the material can be merged into the Presidency of George W. Bush article and/or relevant sub-articles all while adhering to . I noticed that a criticism of Obama article has been deleted twice as a POV fork
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT)