Deletion of Thomas Delany

Comment: although |consensus can change, it's well-established that parliamentarians are automatically notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: The nominator is just simply nominating the articles for deletion. He is not following efore. Please see these two discussions. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Guruvayur_Padmanabhan and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kongad_Kuttisankaran#Kongad_Kuttisankaran . Both are bad nominations along with this one. I request the administrator to take action against the nominator. Because he has been warned 4 times, but is not stopping this action. Thankyou
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: He passes , as he has been a member of a legislative body at the national level
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Clearly and obviously passes . Did the proposer even read the guidelines? It reads - "Politicians and judges who have held international, national office" - Seanad Éireann (Irish Senate) is the upper house of the Irish parliament. A quick 2 min search would have shown this.  for you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN||WP:TROUT)

Comment: Obviously passes . This is not the first time that I have had to correct the nominator's assertion that a subject fails that guideline when he clearly passes. It's fine to make mistakes, but they shouldn't be repeated after they have been pointed out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: Article does need some referencing improvement, so by all means tag it for {{tl|refimprove}}, but having verifiably served in the Oireachtas is a clear and unequivocal ''pass'' of  #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)