Deletion of Gordon Kuhrt

Comment: passes . Rebecca Green is a thorough editor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As director of ministry for the Archbishops' Council of the Church of England, he is quoted in quite a few articles in ''The Times'', ''The Daily Telegraph'', ''The Financial Times'', ''The Sunday Telegraph'', certainly more than an ordinary archdeacon would be. He is considered as one of four English evangelical scholars in the second half of the 20th century, and his book ''An Introduction to Christian Ministry'' discussed, in ''Priesthood in a New Millennium: Toward an Understanding of Anglican Presbyterate in the Twenty-First Century'' https://books.google.com.au/books?id=a2W3AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&dq=%22Gordon+Kuhrt%22&source=bl&ots=FWAlOlNydc&sig=ACfU3U1BU31N4cr-ryqMvY5PlWZzFuCjCA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjMk5iP4-TmAhWNdn0KHQWcCT84FBDoATAEegQIChAB#v=onepage&q=%22Gordon%20Kuhrt%22&f=false. There is a review of his book ''Life’s Not Always Easy'' (not in the article yet) in ''Fulcrum'' https://www.fulcrum-anglican.org.uk/articles/review-of-lifes-not-always-easy-by-gordon-kuhrt/, and the views presented in his book ''An Introduction to Christian Ministry'' are criticised in an article 'Beware the bureaucrats' in the ''Church Times'' https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2005/5-august/comment/beware-the-bureaucrats, though it is Indicative Reading in a Master of Theology in Chaplaincy Studies at Cardiff University https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b0013668ab7225ab8cfc75b/t/5b0458de758d46ba387a13bf/1527011554463/MTh_Chap_Handbook_2015.pdf. The book ''Paul on Baptism: Theology, Mission and Ministry in Context'' gives his book ''Believing In Baptism'' in Suggested Reading, as a "useful popular book  ... widely respected and valued" https://books.google.com.au/books?id=ffhTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR24&lpg=PR24&dq=Kuhrt+%22Believing+In+Baptism%22&source=bl&ots=m_veQDWtGp&sig=ACfU3U0BTrvoBaoveoc0Iox4g-7OxHYs-Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjamKX_6OTmAhUFXn0KHZbzDbc4ChDoATAAegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=Kuhrt%20%22Believing%20In%20Baptism%22&f=false, and there's a review of that book in ''Churchman'' http://churchsociety.org/docs/churchman/102/Cman_102_4_Reviews.pdf (p 380), and the editorial in ''The Scottish Bulletin of Evangelical Theology'' (Spring 1989) is almost a review of it, certainly discusses it and recommends his approach https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/sbet/07-1.pdf, and this issue of the journal has an actual review of it (p 58) http://docplayer.net/154580011-16-the-protestant-dogmaticians-and-the-late-princeton-school-on-the-status-of-the-sacred-apographa-theodore-p-letis-university-of-edinburgh.html. I think he meets , with reviews/discussions of 3 of his books, and is close to meeting #4 "Were recognized by their peers as an authoritative source on religious matters/writing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:RELPEOPLE)

Comment: per {{U|James500}} - "a member of the General Synod of the Church of England" is more than special. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Plemth was a keep in 2012. Also, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Booth_(priest) ended as a keep in 2012 due to coverage. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Henry Cameron was also a snow keep in 2018. I don't see that |consensus has changed that quickly to reconsider these kinds of articles. I'll review the others, time permitting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)