Deletion of Don Murphy (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Guy and the spirit of .  Subject doesn't want an article, and we are powerless to permanently police the article from determined vandalization.  Subject's wishes should be a factor in the discussion in the case of semi-notable folks, per previous discussions in the Daniel Brandt Afds.  End the madness now, for the benefit of Mr. Murphy, and the '''good of the Foundation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: notable producer meets  in all respects  relevant. Don't like it is not a valid criteria for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Yes he passes the guidelines, but they are just that; ''guidelines''... not a policy set in stone or a suicide pact.  Guidelines are not meant to be a hard and fast rule.  There is no reason we absolutely have to have an article on a person just because they meet the letter of , any more so than we absolutely have to delete an article just because the subject does not meet the criteria of .  Guidelines are meant to be applied with judgment. Having an article doesn't make Wikipedia an inherently better encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Meets  as a famously known film producer who has produced films such as ''Natural Born Killers'' and was the originating producer of ''Transformers (film)|Transformers'', a film which made over USD $155-million in its opening week.  LexisNexis reveals several hundred hits relevant to this specific person.  Color me perplexed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Looks to have a significant filmography record and thus passes  although it would needs some further references to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:V)

Comment: if he meets guidelines and is notable, keep the article. All because he |doesn't like or want his article is not a reason to delete it. I also agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: In the last AFD I wrote "Keep, because being a producer for a film as famous as ''Natural Born Killers'' makes you highly notable in cultural life. From  we have 1) ''"widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field"'' and 2) ''"significant roles in notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions"'' and 3) ''"has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."'' Very far from borderline notability, and Wikipedia would be seriously damaged if this article were removed." I see nothing which would suggest that  is not passed by a tremendous margin for being the producer of a major movie
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: seems to pass  to enough of an extent that the subject's desire to have the article deleted are immaterial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)