Deletion of Britannica Party (3rd nomination)

Comment: this and all similar political party articles on the basis of  (Use Common Sense to Improve the Encyclopedia). This is the sort of material that SHOULD be in a comprehensive encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: This does not have to satisfy  which has nothing to say about political parties either explicily or implicitly. More significant is Wikipedia:Notability which states, "''If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.''" The article amply demonstrates that it passes this test. Contrary to User:Doktorbuk's suggestion, the party does not have to prove any importance or notability; it is not its function. Wikipedia does that. And while there are not ''many third party sources'' that is hardly surprising given the dearth of coverage of minor political groupings in the media and elsewher. However, we do have ''The Guardian'', ''Searchlight'' and the Electoral Commission which are entirely reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)