Deletion of Sex noise

Comment: This is  which cobbles together a narrative from random sources that only mention the specific subjects they are cited for in passing. For example the first reference, ''A Dictionary of Sexual Language and Imagery in Shakespearean and Stuart Literature'', p. 626, discusses usage of the term ''groan'' in Early Modern English and briefly mentions a sexual connotation among other things. The seventh source, ''Talk to Me First: Everything You Need to Know to Become Your Kids' "Go-To" Person about Sex'', has a list of vulgar items one is supposed to repeat five times to build the confidence to say them with a serious face to one's children, and one of them is "queef," which apparently is why this passage is cited. The fact that the titles of these books were not named in full gives me the impression that the article was an intentional joke
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The article is not jokey at all. This is a topic of frequent discussion in various formats, including relationship magazines, forums on topics related to discreetness, as well as cultural message boards. Since it is a notable topic it deserves inclusion. A look at google merely confimrs my point that this topic is notable. For example ''sex noise'' gets 667 returns on g books while ''sex moans'' gets 256 returns. Wikipedia has hundreds of articles which primarily deal with the aesthetics of sex. So I found it strange that this encyclopedia focuses only on the visual perception of sex. The article may seem dodgy, only because it is incomplete. It is still being worked but editors don't have all the free time in the world. Another reason this article is important is due to a common trait among men that a woman who makes sounds during sex is more attractive and alluring than women who are silent. Therefore sex sounds form an additional possible role in sexual performance. Thus I would class it as on the same category as pheromones, and physical attractiveness, bith if which by the way have separate articles. All are traits that heighten sexual excitement. Also remember that the above arguments are listed under ''arguments to avoid'' in the  section. I acknowledge it is currently lacking, but please give it time to improve. Plus considering that unintelligible sounds during human sex has often been linked to being a tool for discerning level of gratification. As for the notion that it is original research, almost every other sentence has a reference backing the points up. This subject content is important, but I also suggest the possibility of making a page move, such as maybe to ''sex moans'' if there is no other compromise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC)