Deletion of Barack Obama fly swatting incident

Comment: A clear case of . Many of the NOT indications are here; I'll say #JOURNALISM and REPOSITORY to change it up a little
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOTREPOSITORY)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Honestly, I would urge a speedy delete as yet another in a long line of extremely bad faith article creations and/or article edits by {{u|Grundle2600}}.  All the valid reasons to delete this can be found in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's arms, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Obama's influence on style and fashion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teleprompter usage by Barack Obama, etc...; fails |notability guidelines, it is trivial, it is a piece of end-of-the-news-cycle fluff wholly unworthy of an article or a passage in any other article.  {{u|Grundle2600}} has already responded above with the "but its reliably sourced!" bit, and will no doubt do so again below.  Despite numerous editors having told him that sourcing wasn't the sole justification for an article, or an edit, it just isn't sinking in.  Because here we are.  Again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails , heck even the whole , is only trivia, and is not notable outside a slow news day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOT)