Deletion of Fast Walker

Comment: The website is not a reliable source. The article does not come close to meeting . I am now going to make my personal evaluation of whether this is a ''notable'' alleged UFO incident. I am going to do two things. I am going to search Google ''Books'' and I am going to search the New York Times via my public library's database. If it is mentioned in either I will vote to keep. I do not know yet what the results. will be
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: the single website cited does not even remotely meet , which leaves this one article in Omni, which cites one single "researcher" as pushing this theory. If this article is kept, it will basically need rewriting from the ground up to reflect the real facts, which are that (1) there is no evidence whatsoever that this event ever occurred (the "evidence" is a single supposedly leaked printout), and (2) if it did occur, as the Omni article points out, it is trivially explained as an SR-71 flight. Really, this might merit a paragraph in a general article on UFO conspiracy theories, but that's about the limit.And please, stop using the "this is more notable than other stuff we have articles on" line. We should be striving to ensure that Wikipedia's contents are of a consistently ''high'' standard. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)