Deletion of LinguaTrip

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No indications of notability and Skepsiz has a very flawed idea of the type of references required to meet the criteria for establishing notability as well as a flawed idea on the role of editors at AfD. Nonetheless, I have looked at every reference provided above and they all fail . None of the references are "intellectually independent" and all fail for one of the following reasons: extensive reliance on interviews/quotation with company officers or connected sources with no intellectually independent opinions or analysis , mentions-in-passing , profiles of founders  and finally inclusion in lists of similar companies . There may be a case for an article on Marina Mogilko but I don't see anything that lends itself to meeting the criteria for the company. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: At this point.  Seems to meet our basic requirements for otability|Notability, as shown here https://www.google.com/search?biw=1076&bih=529&tbm=nws&ei=4UlGW7G4INDxzgKBh6z4Bg&q=%22LinguaTrip%22&oq=%22LinguaTrip%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...2558183.2559640.0.2560751.3.3.0.0.0.0.227.405.0j1j1.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.1.177...0.0.U6Rddz0a3G8.  However, a rewrite is necessary for the article to meet English Grammar standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)