Deletion of Argument from poor design

Comment: per above. It does appear to have valid citations, but I do think the article needs cleanup and there is some original research in the article, but the article's subject is not just something  - it is apparently notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: This is a well-written article, but it should probably be renamed to dysteleological argument (currently a redirect), which seems to be more widely used, at least according to google hits.  It has some general citations but could use more specific citations for each point to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)