Deletion of Louis J. Posner

Comment: I have to disagree with Mendaliv that the overall coverage is enough to get him over the notability bar. While he's been involved in other events besides the convictions that attracted coverage, there is a lack of coverage that addresses Posner himself in the kind of depth required to write a proper biography, which has led to it becoming unbalanced. For example, an "Early life and education" section was recently removed as unsourced, that's the kind of material we'd expect to be able to source if he was genuinely notable. I don't see how it can be fixed through editing without sources that address him in the kind of detail required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Last time I suggested a redirect - I'm changing my position based on the subject's request, per . If we remove the VoterMarch bit, we have a wholly negative bio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPDELETE)

Comment: this subject passes the |basic notability criteria of , once you take into account the mainstream coverage of the arrest and disbarment, the lawsuit against Central Synagogue and New York Law Journal, and the Voter March activity. Each of these is an episode of significant coverage, and that's enough to satisfy  when considered '''on the whole'''. As an individual known for more than a criminal act or a criminal trial, it is inappropriate to evaluate this article in terms of . The / issues are red herrings: they can be easily fixed by editing. |AfD is not cleanup.I actually had written a very nice keep rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis J. Posner (2nd nomination) (which was created in bad faith by a sockpuppet, and G5'd), which I would ask an administrator to retrieve for me (I didn't keep a copy unfortunately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:PERP||WP:BLP||WP:COATRACK||WP:NOTCLEANUP)