Deletion of Haynes Aero Skyblazer (2nd nomination)

Comment: a short summary to Roadable aircraft, of which it is a species.  -- While I agree that notability is not temporary, this has the look of a  project that never got anywhere, perhaps becuase the whole thing was impracticable.  I note that there are no references more recent that 2006 and 2007.  If anything had been achieved, I would have expected there to be something more.  I guess that someone provided some funding for a feasibility study.  When the funding ran out, that was the end of the matter.  My personal test on  infrastucture projects is that a subject should not have more than an article on the project generally until it is legally authorised and funded, or at least has a very goood prospect of that.  As a (probably) failed project, I would suggest that a brief summary be merged
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: WP:NTEMP|Notability is not temporary, and something Loch Ness Monster|need Bigfoot|not Aurora spyplane|exist in order to be notable. There are multiple |reliable sources listed in the article, and a quick Google check shows http://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/DSNB/lib00496,10317EA45E8E6AFE.html several http://www.deseretnews.com/article/595068759/Utahn-hopes-winged-car-plans-take-flight.html more that can be added. The article totally needs a good scrub-and-polish, but |AfD is not for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTCLEANUP)