Deletion of Steven Weil

Comment: I was about to say this was a keeper based on the OU position, but upon looking at the OU hierarchy - https://www.ou.org/contact/ OU: contact (where he is listed) and https://www.ou.org/about/ OU Lay leadership - seems this is 1-2 notches from the top. The PR from his appointment reads: {{tq|Rabbi Steven Weil, today, July 1, 2009, officially assumes the position of Executive Vice President, the chief professional officer of the Orthodox Union. In that capacity, he will have day-to-day responsibility for running the largest Orthodox synagogue umbrella group in the world, overseeing its staff and programs, maintaining fiscal responsibility, and above all, projecting an image of leadership and vision throughout the Orthodox Jewish community worldwide.}}. Now - he might be notable - but the sourcing in the article is not sufficient - https://www.ou.org/torah/author/Rabbi_Steven_Weil/#? this is OU's website where his title is specified and nothing else, http://jewishstandard.timesofisrael.com/ou-national-conference-set-for-bergen-to-consider-costs-of-observance-other-issues/?/content/item/ou_national_conference_set_for_bergen_to_consider_costs_of_observance_other/16612 here he is interviewed on some points, and https://www.vosizneias.com/34383/2009/07/01/new-york-rabbi-steven-weil-new-ou-executive-takes-helm-of-largest-orthodox-organization/ this looks like a PR release of his appointment. A BEFORE does show some more sources - but it is not obvious he passes GNG. If someone does a  I am amendable to changing my !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: an advertorially toned page on an unremarkable individual. The article's sources are not suitable for establishing notability, containing material such as: "Weil stated at the time that he would focus on Orthodox Jewish outreach for teens and networking with Orthodox community leadership". Wikipedia is not a resume hosting service nor is it suitable location for tribute pages such as this. Fails  /  for lack of ''independent'' sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . He does not hold a high-ranking position in the OU and there is little independent secondary sourcing on him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The sources provided from the spectrum of media -- both in the article and available elsewhere --  that support hist strong claim of notability, go above and beyond the minimums of the notability standard. Issues of cleanup -- the alleged "promotional" content -- should be addressed through cleanup, not deletion.  As has happened too many times before, it appears that the nominator has not bothered to follow the requirements of , an essential aspect of the deletion process
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)