Deletion of Never Hillary

Comment: as |an indiscriminate set of information. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump's hair
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: This turned out to be a larger movement than the Never Trump movement, and it is one of the main reasons why Trump routed Hillary in the general election. It garnered intense support from not only Trump supporters, but the Bernie Bros as well. There's adequate amount of sources in the article already so there's no questioning whether it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Opinionated sources fail , and article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly notable topic.  Arguments against are as  as can be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I am unmoved by this "movement". I wondered why I had never heard of this so I Googled it and, unsurprisingly, neither has any one else{{emdash}}that is no one other than those fine institution of journalistic excellence: Breitbart, The Inquisitr, and The New York Post. There are insufficient ''reliable'' sources that cover this in any depth. It fails  by a substantial margin. The claim that the article is "heavily sourced" is to be rejected. For example, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/opinion/campaign-stops/can-hillary-clinton-goldwater-girl-win-over-republicans.html?_r=0 The New York Times article doesn't even mention the subject! https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/where-are-the-neverhillary-democrats/2016/08/29/168f6fa0-6def-11e6-9705-23e51a2f424d_story.html The Washington Post article passingly asks "So where are the #NeverHillary Democrats?", refuting the notion that any such movement exists at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)