Deletion of Mountain railways special exhibition in the Hünegg Castel

Comment: Further to Paintitup's comments (which were updated after my first reply): you're right, those articles are pretty bad and should probably be deleted.  But that's a different discussion.  We're talking about Mountain railways special exhibition in the Hünegg Castel, and the argument that we should keep this article because |other stuff exists is a weak one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: as appropriate to Hünegg Castle as indicated above. There is some discussion in , although I would say that only a few of the included sources appear reliable and useful for determining notability. However, most of it appears to be  coverage. As it was a temporary exhibition, I do not see a level of  to warrant a standalone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: The rationale behind the nomination of this article for deletion was given at the time of nomination: it does not meet the |criteria for inclusion based on Wikipedia guidelines.  Please provide a guideline-based argument for its retention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Boys always want to stage train wrecks with their model railways! :)  There are obvious |alternatives to deletion such as a merger into Hünegg Castle and so our |editing policy applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)