Deletion of Josef Schultz

Comment: Please address the criteria in question, 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: there are verifiable sources that this story exists and meets the . Whether it is true or not may be another matter, and the article should be modified to only present what can be verified as fact. This will be a challenge to keep balanced unless more research makes the truth readily verifiable, but deletion is not the solution here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As per comment of VQuakr. "there are verifiable sources that this story exists and meets the . Whether it is true or not may be another matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sufficient notability established.  I did not find this because it was listed by the rticle Rescue Squadron|Article Rescue Squadron
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: I'm not sure that there is enough notability for a biographical article, but the Ruth Melon book ''Journey to the White Rose in Germany'' listed by ManicSpider seems like a reliable source. Thus, I would support adding a brief mention of the incident in a parent article (maybe German resistance perhaps) but I don't believe that there is enough coverage in reliable sources to support an individual article. Of course, any merge would need to be done in a manner so as to not breech . Regards
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: In English sources his name has been anglicised to "Joseph". There are several sources including http://books.google.com.au/books?id=19DS8pxpuToC&lpg=PA189&dq=%22Joseph%20Schultz%22&pg=PA189#v=onepage&q=%22Joseph%20Schultz%22&f=false this and also http://books.google.com.au/books?id=ubX5MQoreNgC&lpg=PA14&dq=%22Joseph%20Schultz%22&pg=PA15#v=onepage&q=%22Joseph%20Schultz%22&f=false this (on page 15) which seems to correspond with part of the version of events, but I don't think sources help overcome the  issue. I think that the story, while perhaps apocryphal, has been used to symbolise the bravery of standing up against the group will when your conscience tells you otherwise. Where that leaves it in terms of an AfD, I have no idea
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: The subject is long dead, so this is not a  issue at all.  The event seems notable and I believe that multiple sources could be found--the story being so exceptional
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)