Deletion of List of atheist Nobel laureates

Comment: IMO, these should all go, and , an essay not a guideline or policy, contains an exception for singling out one of several equivalents: "Wikipedia recognizes that it suffers from systemic bias (see ). Sometimes the nomination of one of a series of articles that have relatively equal merit would further the bias (e.g., deletion of Fooian this but not XYZian this if XYZian represents the majoritarian culture at Wikipedia." I would think that atheist, Hindu, Jewish Christian, and Muslim nobelists are all potential equivalent articles to rise or fall together to avoid bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BIAS)

Comment: per nominator. . I can't understand how the only rationale for "keep" seems to be 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: this should be done through catagor(y/ies) rather than as an article. I further note that this list is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: being an atheist has nothing to do with being given a Nobel prize, thus overlistification, and is also trying to push some connection between the two, thus |original research.  is not a valid argument for keeping this article, though I think that the other list of Nobel laureates by religion should be AfDed individually in the event that this list is deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)