Deletion of Robert J. Schwalb

Comment: I don't believe that the ENnies have any bearing on  #1. While the awards pass notability, I would question whether they are "well known", but the real issue is "significant". The problem is that very few of the award categories are of a standard to imply originality in the field (). I think it definitely should only be the Gold awards  that are considered for notability and I would doubt that any category other than ''best game'' should count for the notability of a person if not being named
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I think there are several issues here which some people don't appear to be addressing. Firstly, in order to confer notability, the Ennies need to be considered major awards. Simply being one of the main awards within a narrow industry sector is not sufficient. If they are major awards, why do they get so little coverage? Secondly, it seems to be stretching things to say that a game winning an award means that anyone who worked on that game won the award. Some of the awards listed are for specific aspects, and anyone not directly involved in those aspects cannot be considered to have won the award. Thirdly, we need reliable sources to verify both that those games won those awards and that the subject of this article played a significant part in the work that was recognised by those awards.  is a requirement for articles, and particularly for BLPs, and the reliable sources do not appear to exist to form the basis of an article here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)