Deletion of James G. Henderson

Comment: Meets the requirements as a specialist in his field , on the basis of seven published books by major publishers, some of the quite widely held, and three of them translated into Chinese (which shows international recognition). I wonder whether the nom e thought about ; the article as submitted was hopelessly inadequate. nut I filled it in, and they could have also. The additional judgements, added before I did that,  seem to be based on the absence of data, saying essentially that if the article is inadequate, the person must not be notable. We have never in the last 4 or 5 years deleted an article for a full professor at a major university, except for those fields, such as education, where apparently there is a feeling that they are not worth serious consideration (and also  excepting a few individuals with unpopular views whether in their own or on unrelated subjects). Both represent prejudice
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)