Deletion of Arab Winter

Comment: and '''merge''' content from Spillover of the Syrian Civil War - The topic of the article is legit, but it should be moved to a more neutral and descriptive title until enough RS |commonly refer to this period as a "winter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: The issue here at AfD is whether the topic and content of this article is |notable (not it's title). This article clearly is notable based on the |reliable sources it already has (as of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arab_Winter&oldid=632965961 this version). The other issues mentioned above need to be addressed, but not here at AfD.  To improve the article, they should be addressed on Talk:Arab_Winter, or by neutral editors making quality improvements (I note that the merge to candidate Arab Spring also has much content in tables (as of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arab_Spring&oldid=633202014 this version), that also would be better converted to encyclopedic narrative
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: I'll repeat what's been said above. this article is largely based on . The term "Arab Winter" is not widely used anywhere, and seems to be trying to push a . Perhaps some of the content is valuable, but the article is not. Do away with it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV)