Deletion of Brenda Biesterfeld (2nd nomination)

Comment: or '''Rename/Rewrite''' I think there is enough |reliably sourced information to write at least an acceptable |stub about the event itself but the article should not be focussed around the particular individual per #NEWS (''"Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that individual should be limited to the article about that event"'') and  (''"If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted"''). Considering the amount of coverage the event received it seems possible it will be referred back to should a similar event occur in the future and a |verfiable, |neutral p|encyclopaedia article (which I think would be possible to write from the available sources) would be of use to those wanting to research the event further
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:STUB||WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:5||WP:5p)

Comment: per . Person does not appear notable outside this one event. Event itself does not appear to be notable in the encyclopedic sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and . I concur also with TravellingCari's point to DGG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)