Deletion of Flip (slang)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to Filipino American. This might be |systematic bias of available internet searchable sources, but if one were to look up '''"Flip" slang Filipino''' one would find http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Flip%22+slang+Filipino&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5 multiple academic journal entries, and a https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Flip+(slang)%22#safe=off&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Flip%22+slang+Filipino&oq=%22Flip%22+slang+Filipino&gs_l=serp.3...7869.15187.0.15365.27.24.2.0.0.3.457.3630.12j8j2j0j2.24.0...0.0...1c.1.15.psy-ab.pRBq5u6DFCY&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47244034,d.cGE&fp=e547dc46afc787cc&biw=1047&bih=863 number of book entries (some dictionary definitions, others a little more in-depth). Now I understand that some of the arguments are based on , but it maybe possible to cobble something more than a stub entry based on the sources I found to write a history of the word, and its then its present usage in the United States (and possibly elsewhere). Otherwise as the majority of internet searchable sources are from the United States, and thus my systematic bias statement earlier, the article can be turned into a redirect to Filipino American as an alternative name of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:NOTDICTIONARY)

Comment: Certainly doesn't seem to be notable enough to have its own article.  Likely a case of |undue weight.  At the very best, only worth a brief mention in Filipino American, but nothing more, if that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)