Deletion of Abdullah Shahab

Comment: what aspect of the nomination are you agreeing with?  The nominator asks ''"what if he is not connected with terrorism afterall?"''  But the article doesn't say, never said that he was connected with terrorism.  That he was reported to have been captured because he was believed to have a connection with terrorism is referenced, and will remain true, even if he is cleared of this allegation.  I regard this nomination as based on a mis-reading of BLP.  Articles are not supposed to be hagiographies.  When OJ Simpson is arrested, we summarize what  say he was arrested for, without taking a stand on whether the allegations are "true".  When he is charged we cover what  say the charges were, without taking a stand on whether he was guilty.  When he is acquitted we do not remove from his article the fact that he was charged, because those charges might be embarrassing to him.  The same should hold true for Abdullah Shahab, I believe
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)