Deletion of Doctor Who: Tin Dog Podcast

Comment: Has not been the subject of multiple independent non-trivial published works, received a well-known award, nor is distributed independently of the creators throuh a repected medium: does not meet  at this time. Does not meet proposed  criteria either. If article is deleted, this should not stop a notable, well referenced article being written in the future, if later on the podcast merits inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:PODCAST)

Comment: I realise that having no sources from pages outside of promotional pages for the podcast doesn't help the artical keep its current position, although I must stress that I beleive if we can find outside proof that this podcast has gained large popularity in a very short period of time it could still be valid. For example looking for official reports given to the creater of the podcast giving his listenership figures, this is if relying on Itunes isn't enough. I have made recent edits to prevent the artical becoming an advert or spam (following ) and will take any suggestions to continue this trend. unsigned comment by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: Fails requirements of  and . Also, the article is leaning a bit towards . Wikipedia is not a vehicle in which to promote podcasts with little independent coverage from reliable sources 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:N||WP:SPAM||WP:RS)