Deletion of 1st Cathays Al Huda

Comment: per . I don't believe it should be necessarily deleted, but the information can certainly be merged into one of the articles on UK_Scouting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Local branches of national organizations are not usually notable, and even if this one is, see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: to Scouting in Wales.  does say that  coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee for a separate article. Editors at the Scouting WikiProject have reached (and reaffirmed) a longstanding consensus that although a local unit or Scout camp may have multiple reliable sources, it is not appropriate for a standalone article but, rather, should be included in the larger Council or Association article of which it is a part. I see no reason to make an exception in this instance
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily passes  per the multitude of reliable sources in the article. See http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/south_east/4847286.stm this article from the BBC, http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/09/27/scout-leader-kicked-out-for-harassment-91466-21911541/ this article from the ''South Wales Echo'', http://www.webcitation.org/5gdUoq0ED this article from Children & Young People Now, http://humaniststudies.org/enews/?id=236&article=3 this article from the National Secular Society, and http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=2264129 this article from the ''Times Educational Supplement''. Would the nominator care to explain why they nominated this article for deletion when http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1st_Cathays_Al_Huda&curid=22730729&diff=289632848&oldid=289045967 these sources were already present in this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)