Deletion of KUMM

Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 24
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: The article has one source that is used to cite ownership of the station.  There are no sources that are contained in the article, or the indication of the existence of any sources that |support a claim of notability.  Naturally, when there is an existence of significant coverage, the article does not need to cite all or any of them aside from |when a reliable source is required.  A good example of this would be WCCO (AM) (The article does have it's own set of issues.  However, there is existence of such sources in easy to find places throughout the web without too much digging
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:FULLCITE)

Comment: I think we have gotten ourselves to the best possible situation in that the article was improved now to establish notability under roadcast due to {{xt|"established broadcast history"}}.  The article has established that in my opinion, as well as now provided two third party sources.  So at this point I will now rescind my previous objections to the station meeting the notability standards.  I would hope that in the future such comments that were initially posted to my talk page in regards to my proposition for deletion, will be rephrased in a more civil manner.  We were able to get much farther once we moved towards refreshing specific Wikipedia policy and precedent and improving the article due to this discussion to rectify the initial objection
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: User has clearly not read , as it says a station that has a license and is broadcasting (which this one is) is inherently notable.  There are also numerous other AfDs that have show that community consensus is that radio and television stations are notable.  This station is notable, it has sources (one going to the FCC) and  is on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST||WP:BURDEN)

Comment: I looked at this with an eye towards closing as a speedy keep. I may be missing something, but I can't find anything in  that says any US broadcast radio station which has an FCC licence and is broadcasting, is taken here as inherently notable (and the policy hasn't been edited for months). Hence, so far, this AfD doesn't look like a speedy keep to me. Moreover, I don't see anything in this short discussion that shows the article text as yet meets anything in , though it does seem to have http://www.kumm.org/about/ been broadcasting since 1972, which if cited in the article might lead editors (perhaps only the two of you) to a quick consensus that the topic is notable owing to an "established broadcast history
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST||WP:BROADCAST)