Deletion of Raul Cătinaș (2nd nomination)

Comment: re|.karellian-24}} In multiple discussions, I have said that since you obviously don't like the existing notability criteria for kickboxers, you should seek to get them changed.  AfD discussions are not the place, though I gave you suitable locations.  You also need to quit making up your own reasons and rankings.  Either show a ranking from an acceptable independent source or don't claim a fighter is top 10 just because you think he should be.  The fact that he trained at some of the top Dutch gyms is a case of  and fighters aren't notable just because they're fighting for the Glory promotion.  If these are the best independent reliable sources that show significant coverage of Catinas, then I feel even more confident about my vote.  Here's my analysis of the sources you just mentioned
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: He wasn't notable in 2014 and he's done nothing since then to show WP notability.  He doesn't meet any of the kickboxer notability criteria at  and I'm not seeing the significant independent coverage required to meet .  I found interviews and routine sports coverage, but that's not enough.  I did correct the article's mistaken claims that he was a two-time K-1 Grand Prix Finalist because he never actually qualified for the 8 man finals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NKICK||WP:GNG)