Deletion of Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy

Comment: or '''redirect''' - Notability, and the effort put into making something, are not in any way linked. Most of the links above are "Capsule reviews" which are are excluded in the notability criteria. Topless Robothttp://www.toplessrobot.com/2009/09/this_metal_gear_fan_movie_is_100_solid_man.php states that he hasn't watched all of the film (yet), and RockPaperShotgun's Kieron Gillon http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/10/01/metal-gear-solid-philanthropy-fan-film/ claims he doesn't even intent to watch it. This is ''way'' off . It is verifiable at least, so if someone wants to briefly mention it in :Fan film or somesuch, that's fine
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: the "blogs" referenced are exactly the places you'd expect to see videogaming news of this kind.  The reason blogs aren't normally accepted as sources is their lack of editorial oversight; Destructoid and PlayStation Official Magazine are both edited.  There's also coverage on RockpaperShotgun (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/10/01/metal-gear-solid-philanthropy-fan-film/ here), Kotaku (http://kotaku.com/5369142/another-metal-gear-fan-made-movie here), Topless Robot (http://www.toplessrobot.com/2009/09/this_metal_gear_fan_movie_is_100_solid_man.php here) and Gamespy (http://au.gamespy.com/articles/102/1029177p1.html here).  Probably others too but that's four commercial sites with an editorial policy.  The vast majority of fan films are certainly non notable, but this is one of the Troops (film)|very few to clear the bar. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources means it clears 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)