Deletion of Paris Hilton energy plan

Comment: I'm not even going to bother listing out the various sources, since... well, c'mon.... This is absurdly notable. Is it a long news cycle? Maybe, maybe not.  says "multiple non-trivial". Here's several sources, of which you can take any several ''dozen'' from any of these searches: http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Paris%20Hilton%22%20%2Benergy%20policy&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wn here, http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&nolr=1&hl=en&q=%22Paris+Hilton%22+%2Benergy+plan&btnG=Search+News here, and http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&nolr=1&hl=en&q=%22Paris+Hilton%22+%2Benergy+policy&btnG=Search+News here. Take your pick of any several dozen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: back to Paris Hilton. For the moment it is bsically still a #NEWS case. If anyone still remembers this 6-8 months from now, could be worth a a separate article then
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Put w/ '''Paris Hilton'''. It's sort of some pop-culture/humorous "nine-day wonders", as Mandsford said. I stil don't think it has a place within |notability, but it does deserve a mention...in the Paris Hilton article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)