Deletion of Radioactive Panda

Comment: trivial web comic, fails , WP is not a list of such things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: edit conflict). So far I have seen no rationale as to why this comic is notable. Two people have said it "seems notable" with no evidence to back them up, and one person has opted to keep because the previous two did. AfD is more than a vote. If it seems notable, I'd like to hear why. I see the author has published one book, but I can't find ''any'' information on it, leading me to believe it might be minor or self-published. Most of the links to it are from http://www.google.ca/search?as_lq=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.radioactivepanda.com%2F&btnG=Search private blogs, it has a http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.radioactivepanda.com%2F&url=radioactivepanda.com traffic rank of around 450k, and I can't find any third party sources to |verify anything. In fact, the only two sources in the article are both primary- we have one from the website, and another from a forum. If someone wants to provide evidence to the contrary of what I've said I'll consider changing my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: There's no policy that says similar cases have the same notability, and actually, similar cases do not have the same notability (as explained in the essay Wikipedia:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability).  There are no |reliable sources, which is the main notability criteria criterion in WP:WEB.  So to argue for the keep side, you need reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: AS PER ORIGINAL NOM. Look, this is about consensus, so you have to give VALID reasons why we should keep an incoherent article about a trivial webcomic. Saying that Wikipedia has a long list of other things that should be deleted is NOT a reason to keep it.  clearly sets a stadard this does not meet. IF you can come up with a reason to keep it that answers the statements in , great. If not, then please don't spam keep votes just to keep your article up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)