Deletion of Scott Presler

Comment: The article states nothing about him that is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee inclusion in an encyclopedia, and the referencing is not strong enough to get him over  in ''lieu'' of having to pass any SNGs: once you discount all the self-published |primary sources that aren't support for notability at all and the sources which mention his name but are not ''about him'' for the purposes of establishing his notability, the few left over that are actually |reliable source coverage ''about him'' don't add up to enough. GNG, as always, is ''not'' just "count the footnotes and keep anything that meets or exceeds an arbitrary mumber": we also consider the depth of how substantively any source is or isn't about him, the geographic range of how widely he's getting covered, and the ''context'' of what he's getting covered ''for'', not just the raw number of footnotes present
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)

Comment: per . Likely product of |undisclosed paid editing from a |sockpuppet ring. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juanafavour for details. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:UDP||WP:SOCK)