Deletion of Analytic/Anglophone and Continental Philosophy

Comment: as |original research.  Though there are some supporting citations for a few of its claims, the bulk of this article is idiosyncratic, original interpretation and synthesis, stated as though it were incontrovertible factual information, in Wikipedia's voice – exactly what the original research guideline is meant to guard against.  There are serious NPOV issues with some of these claims as well, but this is a secondary concern.  I agree that it would be possible to write a neutral, well-sourced, synthetic encyclopedia article on the analytic-continental split, but this is not that article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)