Deletion of IceRocket (2nd nomination)

Comment: After skimming the sources provided above, I think this subject meets . "|Nobody's working on it" is generally an argument to avoid, but I'm willing to work on the article myself; hopefully that assuages the nominator's doubts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: Recent coverage admittedly somewhat marginal and tending toward the trivial, but 04/05 coverage would appear to satisfy .  A sampling: http://www.clickz.com/3391731http://news.cnet.com/New-search-tool-gets-billionaires-backing/2100-1032_3-5297380.htmlhttp://www.searchenginejournal.com/icerocket-adds-blog-search-to-new-features/933
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: a sad and unloved article to be sure, but the subject appears to pass .  It seems like it failed to really take off, but still got massive media attention, especially when it first came out.  I'm seeing plenty of Google Books hits too.  Notable enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)