Deletion of Minor characters of Days of our Lives

Comment: Character lists should generally restrict themselves to significant characters, or at the very least, characters to whom understanding of the plot would be significantly impaired (i.e. reading an episode list would be difficult) if they were not listed. Sourcing solves this problem in most cases, but even when considering the latter criterion, an ''entire list'' of minor characters falls squarely under . Merge the necessary ones to the main article or a larger list and trim the rest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: due to sources aplenty when checking on Google.  These are notable and major characters to millions of viewers of this astonishingly recognizable show.  Therefore, this article concerning non-trivial characters undeniably passes fails  and  per  and .  Character lists should generally be as comprehensive as possible themselves to appeal to our broad diverse readership.  Sourcing solves this problem in most cases, but even when considering the latter criterion, an ''entire list'' of minor characters falls squarely under our support of spinoff articles.  If we merge the necessary ones to the main article or a larger list and trim the rest, we must still retain the edit history per the GFDL.  No need to protect the public from this article.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:PRESERVE||WP:MAD)

Comment: one citation for ~43,348 bytes does not a valid article make; fails , , et. al
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: The entire article is plot summary, and is in direct violation of . It would need a complete rewrite to be notable. And if there are so many sources (ostensibly plot related) when doing an online search, the information is not anything the public cannot find elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)