Deletion of 2008 Murshidabad beheading

Comment: the title does not meet  and #NEWSPAPER|Wikipedia is not a newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POVNAMING||WP:NOT)

Comment: per  and less notable than Rizwanur Rahman
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Nomination rationale consists of several things: objecting to the name (not a deletion reason), accusations of COI (not a deletion reason),  (not a deletion reason) and borderline personal attacks. It also consists of a  argument that this happens regularly (which I doubt), and is thus not remotely based on policy. This event did receive coverage a couple of years after the event: http://www.haindavakeralam.com/hkpage.aspx?PageID=10691&SKIN=B, although how reliable that is, I don't know (it doesn't seem too bad). Obviously the Kolkatta Telegraph is fairly local coverage, but if the Asian Age is reliable, then that evidently is not. There's also this http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=6935&SKIN=C. Add Hindi sources, which will surely exist, and I'm confident this passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The main concern is that . There are no as such COI in this article. The incident and event is notable. any one can write the article as mention by ''similar to that happens in many undeveloped villages across India due to lack of poverty, educations and social awareness
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)