Deletion of Zoroastrian Students' Association

Comment: There are hardly any third party sources which can satisfy . Multiple third party sources are needed to show that an organisation is notable. Even searching for the Persian name doesn't bring up these. From the Persian language sources I found and translated with Google, I managed to verify 2 facts - 1. It is a student organisation. 2. It is registered with the ministry of interior or some equivalent. None of these however talk about the organisation in detail or offer any details about it. Significant coverage in reliable and independent sources are needed for passing , which is not available here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: While I sympathize with the discussion about "systemic bias," on Wikipedia, I too was not able to locate any independent sources on this subject. The fact of the matter is that if verifiable and independent sources don't exist, the article doesn't pass  let alone . Organization age isn't an indication of notability, third-party coverage is. Absent of someone else discovering some good sources (which is possible, but hasn't happened yet), this should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG)