Deletion of List of GO Transit stations

Comment: per above commenters. The difference between this and the Metrolink or London Underground lists isn't that GO Transit is inherently less valid in principle; it's that the Metrolink and London Underground lists both contain ''substantive'' content ''beyond'' just listing the stations' names — they both contain actual substantive ''introductions'' that go well ''beyond'' just restating the page title; they both contain system maps and photographs; they both list the stations in expanded tables that also include columns for supplementary details such as intermodal connections, opening dates and ridership statistics; they both contain |reliable source ''references'' to ''support'' the content. I'd be perfectly okay with keeping this ''if'' it could be |Heymanned up to the ''quality'' standard displayed by those lists — but in ''this'' form it's not even close to substantive or keepable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:HEY)

Comment: There are hundreds of similar articles for other systems. This is not an  argument, but shows that these are a standard article type with consensus to exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Fails to meet any of the criteria of -REASON and it appears to be more useful than the category list because it is sortable. Wider tables with more columns may be problematic when viewed on phones
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)