Deletion of SmartSVN

Comment: Fails , , etc. Only one of the three keep !votes is based in any policy at all, but I disagree that the sources come anywhere close to GNG/NSOFT. Regarding comments by {{u|mstrap}} and {{u|Margin1522}}, the standards for reliable sourcing are not the nominator's; they are |common to all of Wikipedia (click that link). Primary sources simply do not count to establish notability. |That other articles exist with similar problems does not mean this should be kept, but may mean others should be deleted if they don't meet standards for |notability and |reliable sourcing. That something is |useful is likewise an argument to keep as lots of things are useful to different people and we need a measure somewhat more objective than that to determine what subjects to include. --&mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT||WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:N||WP:RS||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: Article fails , unable to find any significant coverage about this software. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I have added the following paragraph to the article, with sources from Bloomberg and Open Source Magazine: "WANdisco acquired SmartSVN from Syntevo in September 2012 . As of 2012, the software had been adopted by developers across more than 2,500 companies, and was recording more than 10,000 downloads a month.1 WANdisco is a major corporate sponsor of the Subversion project. In 2009 it hired core Subversion committers, and in 2010 hired Subversion release manager Hyrum Wright to lead its efforts with the Subversion project.2 The company sponsors an SVN Forum with sections on community news, Subversion, and SmartSVN.3" The paragraph doesn't say so, but users include Fortune 500 companies. I think this might be enough to help it pass  and . For the notability of Subversion itself, see Apache Subversion. –&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NSOFTWARE)