Deletion of Kirsty Finlayson

Comment: does not meet , political candidates are not inherently wikinotable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: The subject's political career to date fails , falling under the specific note that ''"being ... an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline"''. As to whether there is |evidence that the subject meets , the authorship of an item published by 24plusnews.co.uk is a primary source, and being quoted in passing in a BBC News item on dating apps is non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NPOL||:WP:RS||:WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Coverage cited is trivial or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: per . Wikipedia is not an info site for candidates in upcoming elections and usually the current incumbent didn't have an article until after winning the election anyway, so it's actually incredibly neutral. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Contesting a seat will never make a person notable. Why would it. People contest seats for all sorts weird and wonderful reasons but only if they win it, will it pass the politician notability policy.  Fails . No stand-alone to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BIO)