Deletion of Bulgaria–Indonesia relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: spaced ndash}} This topic passes , section GNG. Source examples include (some are non-English): http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=26130, http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=91522, http://internasional.kompas.com/read/2009/09/06/07205085/bulgaria.kagumi.kekayaan.budaya.indonesia, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-80251119.html, http://www.antaranews.com/berita/1273712117/splendor-of-indonesia-tampil-di-bulgaria, http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-20426860_ITM, http://sofiaecho.com/2006/05/29/639362_bulgaria-to-send-humanitarian-aid-for-indonesias-earthquake-victims, http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=64189
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I believe it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: another one of these strange articles. Pure 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: surely two countries mutually acknowledging each other's existence is not enough to substantiate "''bilateral relations''". One treaty does not bilateral relations make (surely, unless there is some longer term ). Contributions of small amounts of aid, while valuable and helpful, are surely considered routine in instances where many other countries also gave aid. It is synthesis, I think, to consider a group of minor, fairly routine incidents/agreements and determine there is some broad (and significantly covered and |notable) relationship between the two. So many of these essays have come up for deletion that I think it's about time we have a look at a more substantive review than individual AFDs. But anyway
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EFFECT||WP:N)