Deletion of Storm Streaming Server

Comment: I guess I get to defend my first-ever article on Wikipedia. I'm not very familiar with the whole deletion process, so pardon me if I'm doing something against the rules, but I would like to present my arguments here as well. While this is true that most sources relate to blog/post, these are primary sources for the History section. This is quite common for software articles. The application received coverage in one of Poland's most popular online tech blog (Spider's Web). I understand that some people might argue this is 100% objective, although it is not a sponsored article (such are also posted on mentioned site and marked accordingly). The book is the second source. It might not be a significant number of sources, but they are present. I might be wrong, but all those mentioned guidelines like  and  do not provide precise requirements regarding the number of sources, time-frame etc. Once again - since I'm a new user and I lack experience, if there is anything I can do to improve the article (reach required number of sources etc) I would more than happy to do it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)

Comment: It's . I couldn't find additional sources and the majority of the page sources are press releases or blogs. That leaves one reliable source (the book) and some may argue the Spider Web's web coverage is a second. Regardless, this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)