Deletion of Sara Erikson

Comment: as meeting  ("''significant roles in multiple commercially produced or significant films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions''") and meeting  ("''If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability''") per the sources found by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:BIO)

Comment: Sigh, I know how the deletion game works. Nominator states it is not notable. Editor provides references, nominator says it is not enough references, editor provides more references, nominator then says those references are trivial. So here are around 30 more google news references to the "couple".http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Sara+Erikson%22 lets start arguing triviality now.  and  are much, much less controversial than  is. But the article well sourced, meeting all guidelines, including notability, so that also is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ENT||WP:N)