Deletion of Johannes Maas (missionary) (2nd nomination)

Comment: reluctantly. Although I agree that there are |too few articles on notable missionaries and clergy (especially those active after the publication of the 1911ish Catholic Encyclopedia and Encyclopedia Britannica), this individual simply doesn't meet the encyclopedia's notability requirements, especially in light of BLP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: per the lack of significant coverage in |reliable sources. A http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Johannes+Maas%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-press%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a Google News Archive search returns six results, none of which provide sufficient coverage about this missionary; most, if not all, of the sources appear to be about a different individual of the same name. Other searches for sources do not return reliable sources.I concur with Phil Bridger's analysis of the sources above. {{user|Jackie-thai}}'s assertion that this individual is notable because "was recognized by his alma mater (University of Pittsburgh) for his missionary service" does not establish notability; a minor, non-notable award does not confer notability per . Serving as an adviser to the White House also does not establish notability because the White House has ''many'' advisers; only advisers who have official positions or have had an impact of the administration are notable. Having a notable cousin and visiting Mother Theresa do not establish notability because |notability is not inherited.Per Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, a biography of a living person sourced to only blogs, forums, and other unreliable sources should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO||WP:INHERITED)