Deletion of Aimee Ng

Comment: Four of the five are passing mentions and the they are part of ''Cocktails with a Curator'' essentially making them the same reference across outlets. The ''Cocktails with a Curator'' is the Museum of Modern Art own magazine programme. So I don't think they even qualify as sources and they are certainly not in-depth, nor reliable. This is a BLP and they don't conform to .  It need much more solid sources than mere passing mentions
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: notable enough for the career path, if more citations are available, and woman in role in a major and unique exhibition of global significance, citations enough for GNG, or if borderline  improve by more suitable citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , including because "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability," and because I have added this https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/arts/design/frick-collection-moroni-exhibition.html New York Times article that extensively interviews Ng as an expert, as well as this https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-staying-inside-guide-raise-a-glass-to-art-history-11593860400 Wall Street Journal review of the Frick's 'Cocktails With a Curator' that includes more than a passing mention of Ng's role, this https://www.vogue.com/article/how-art-galleries-museums-adapting-coronavirus Vogue article that includes more than a passing mention of Ng because it includes several quotes from her talking about 'Cocktails with a Curator,' this https://www.washingtonpost.com/goingoutguide/4-portals-to-creative-greatness--all-from-the-comfort-of-your-couch/2020/05/05/2b1d03c6-8bee-11ea-ac8a-fe9b8088e101_story.html Washington Post article recommending 'Cocktails with a Curator' and providing slightly more than a passing mention with some commentary about Ng, and this https://www.cleveland.com/news/2021/01/leery-about-visiting-galleries-museums-during-pandemic-check-out-online-possibilities-recommended-by-local-arts-leaders.html Cleveland.com article 'particularly recommending' one of Ng's 'Cocktail with a Curator' shows. When combined with the sources that were already in the article, including https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2014/05/16/from-her-palace/ The Paris Review quoting Ng as an expert,  notability appears to be established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Namedrops do not contribute to notability, nor do interviews, even if they come from RSs. , on which  is based, is clear about this. I've found no SIGCOV about the subject in my search, and the namedrops do not indicate passage of NPROF#7 either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)