Deletion of Hide the Decline

Comment: as a  and per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Where is the significant depth of coverage required by ? Is it in one source that treats the subject in depth or is it a large number of brief mentions that together show depth of coverage, or something in between? For an article subject that attacks someone (who falls well above marginal notability himself, but isn't famous), the sourcing should be airtight. Wikipedia has a number of articles that have very negative information on people who are notable but not very famous. It might be a good idea to change BLP policy to disallow articles like this, about subjects that may be marginally notable attacks (in this case suggesting, with a laugh, that a notable scientist is a liar). We should expect a lot more of these in the future. For now, I'm undecided on keep/delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: lacks multiple, independent, significant coverage hence fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: because it meets the |general notability guideline. I came here expecting to !vote to delete, but there is real notability here. Of course the video itself is an exercise in gleeful ignorance, but correctness or worth has never been a criteria for notability. More importantly, the reaction of its targets (Mann threatening to sue etc) was interesting and important enough to warrant significant press coverage, as the article already demonstrates. I understand why many will want this deleted, but I believe that based on policy, it deserves to live on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I do not believe that the sourcing thus far provided rises to satisfy the following  guideline related to demonstrating "significant coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)