Deletion of Adam Leipzig

Comment: as per the additional references added to the article since nomination that show significant coverage in reliable sources such as The New York Times, Washington Post and so on, so asic is passed. Regarding promo content that can be edited out and watched for by neutral editors, thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: article was indeed  created by an inexperienced COI/SPA.  But the thing is,this movie producer/promoter/corporate exec is notable.  I have added a little sourcing to the page, which needs work.  But this passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Lacks . Being an executive in a movie studio that puts out product makes one notable why? Some cite links either don't work or don't mention the subject, and writing a column or two for '' The New York Times'' doesn't cut it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)