Deletion of Mickey Gall

Comment: Fails , but I think passes .  The main reason is that he is the fighter that is supposed to fight CM Punk in his MMA debut.  CM Punk's debut is gaining a lot of coverage and makes sense considering the links between MMA and WWE.  This goes beyond  since his proposed opponent, Gall, is gaining coverage in of himself due to being the proposed opponent.  Here are some examples - http://www.mmafighting.com/2016/2/14/10985238/mike-jackson-believes-mickey-gall-will-finish-cm-punk-in-the-first, http://www.fightsports.tv/story/30897872/meet-mickey-gall-the-frontrunner-to-be-cm-punks-first-ever-ufc-opponent, http://www.mmamania.com/2016/2/13/10987602/cm-punk-sweepstakes-winner-mickey-gall-talks-about-injury-delay-and, http://espn.go.com/blog/mma/post/_/id/22893/the-cm-punk-effect-hits-ufc-with-mickey-gall-michael-jackson, and http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/cm-punk-injury-back-surgery-set-delay-former-wwe-stars-ufc-debut-against-mickey-gall-1543114.  I think these go beyond  because they don't just give a fight recap, talk about "fights to make next", etc.  They go into detail about Gall, how his fights impact the debut of CM Punk, and go into far more detail than a fighter that didn't even make TV of a UFC Fight Night card.  Also, Gill has gained coverage not normal to a guy - his lone fight was covered in detail abroad (see http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/ufc/article-3435532/CM-Punk-face-Mickey-Gall-UFC-fight-debutant-beats-Mike-Jackson.html) - nor normal coverage for MMA - financial implications are covered by Forbes (see http://www.forbes.com/sites/mattconnolly/2016/01/07/cm-punk-vs-mickey-gall-ufc-choosing-unknown-fighter-for-wwe-stars-debut-would-be-bad-for-business/#71a060028128).  Also, the proposed fight appears delayed.  Rare for a guy with one fight that wasn't even on TV to have joke top ten lists on who he should fight next (see http://halfguarded.com/cm-punk-injured-10-people-mickey-gall-should-fight-instead/).  Special case here, but I do think he meets GNG, therefore keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:GNG||WP:INHERENT||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: If I had to vote to keep or delete, I'd vote to delete because so far I don't think the case has been made yet for notability.  Fortunately, I don't have to make that choice.  I don't believe he meets  because of a pro wrestling style feud that smacks of BLP1E and .  I do think the odds are in his favor that we will eventually meet , but he's not there yet and there's no guarantee that he will make it.  My choice would be to userfy the article until such time as he meets  so that the article doesn't have to be recreated from scratch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NMMA||WP:NMMA)

Comment: Fails  and . Article was created . No objections to userfying article until he becomes notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)