Deletion of Gaba Kawa

Comment: Things don't seem quite as clearcut as you suggest, but we're way out on the fringe of policy where it's barely possible to support a weak "keep" or "delete". Deleting it on the basis of "what there is now is all that it can ever be" is a violation of , though, and significant since it hasn't yet seen individual American release yet and won't till the end of the year. As for sources, a bit of legwork in Google shows that while it doesn't have any mainstream reliable coverage (few mangas do), there are a lot of sources (such as about.com) that have covered it to some extent and might or might not be considered reliable. I'm not going to pursue it by arguing for a keep here, though, because this manga really doesn't warrant it - even if the notability rules were more suited to manga, it'd still be pretty non-notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: if the only real argument for deletion is borderline notability and even the nom is wringing her hands over it (admit it... you're still not sure ;) ), an invocation of  may be appropriate: there is no limit to the number of subjects we can cover, so if a subject is ''possibly'' notable, why not just cover it? This may also be a rather obtuse example of , as the manga is being published in English later this year, which means there could be some reliable sources with new information spring up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PAPER||WP:POTENTIAL)