Deletion of Cat Daddy

Comment: The article meets the  by far.  is the special notability guideline (SNG) for songs that says, if a song meets these requirements, then it '''is''' notable, but that doesn't mean there aren't songs that don't meet those requirements that aren't notable themselves (too many negatives?). This is one example of such a song. For comparison, see Freakum Dress as one of the best examples of a song that doesn't meet NSONG, but is notable on its own
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSONG)

Comment: Per Gongshow's sources. Notable as a subject, just not necessarily as a song. Meets the , which is most important
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Going by some of the article's better sources: MTV http://rapfix.mtv.com/2011/01/20/the-rej3ctz-cat-daddy-is-mtv-jams-jam-of-the-week/http://rapfix.mtv.com/2012/05/03/kate-upton-cat-daddy-bikini-dance-back/, ''LA Times'' http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/gossip/la-et-mg-kate-upton-cat-daddy-video-ban,0,5113266.story, ABC News http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2012/05/kate-upton-lights-up-internet-with-cat-daddy-video/, and Fox News http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2012/05/03/mistakes-were-made-youtube-sorry-for-banning-video-kate-upton-dancing/ all contain significant coverage. The subject's notability appears to exist more as a "dance move" than as a "song", so I'm not too concerned whether or not this meets ; more importantly, it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG||WP:GNG)