Deletion of Nik Halik

Comment: While much of the article and in fact the searches turn up puff pieces I am convinced there is notoriety in the subject: ''Perhaps not for the book''  (5 Day Weekend) which was a co-write situation, but more for the subject's wealth and ability to perhaps be a civilian moonwalker. I found references which appear in reliable sources: https://www.forbes.com/sites/garrettgunderson/2018/04/26/let-this-adventure-entrepreneur-show-you-how-to-literally-ride-success-to-the-moon/#73b8a4776541 Forbes, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Disconnect-from-the-grid-and-do-things-differently-Nik-Halik/articleshow/20789219.cms Times of India, https://www.smh.com.au/business/small-business/who-wants-to-be-a-thrillionaire-20140522-38pns.html Sydney Morning Herald, https://www.theage.com.au/national/thrillionaire-nik-aims-for-the-moon-20071126-ge6e1d.html The Age and https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/312068 Entrepreneur The article is in need of a Neutral POV rewrite (I started to add refs and rewrite a bit), however  Seems this subject meets our general notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Per a basic  search, I found some articles and content about the subject in seconds, listed below. Not !voting at this time, but the subject ''has'' received some coverage outside of the purview of his books. Furthermore, coverage about a subject's books can qualify notability per  if independent book reviews in RS are available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Per a source review, just squeaks by . Some sources have interview content, but also contain non-interview biographical information
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)