Deletion of Discrimination lawsuits and incidents in Japan

Comment: I'm not convinced cleanup will really help here, since this article is largely a duplicate of Racial issues in Japan, at least in terms of the encyclopedic topics it could cover. As constituted now, and as the pagename seems to suggest, this article is a laundry list of incidents that allign with a certain POV. I would hold this violated , but the broader problem is this is just a poor way of organizing articles to provide encyclopedic coverage a topic, when you're creating articles to list only examples on one side of the issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Delete'''.  isn't a reason to keep. There's already an article, racial issues in Japan, that could be expanded and changed to a different title if necessary. This article is not only a soapbox, but could be considered a POV fork
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: Sourcing is fine, but #SOAPBOX
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per . It is also borderline |G10 due to the inflammatory nature of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:CSD)