Deletion of Untitled Woody Allen TV series

Comment: per  and . There seems to have been one bubble of news reporting around Jan 13, then every other news outlet rehashed the same bits and/or offered opinions about the television industry or Allen himself. Until there is an actual thing, not just a planned thing, we should not have an article on it. The deal can possibly be briefly mentioned at Woody Allen and/or Amazon Studios in line with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:WEIGHT)

Comment: Most of these new comments are repeating the same arguments already stated above, which I've already responded to. It seems to me this was relisted specifically do discuss the applicability of NFF to television shows, so should new comments focus on that? Maybe {{User|Joe Decker}} can clarify. (I personally think such a discussion belongs at WikiProject Television or the  talk page, but that's just my opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: WP:CRYSTAL does not apply here in the least. That guideline refers to "unverifiable speculation", which is not the case here as this subject is clearly |verifiable via |reliable sources. The nominator also cites , which, as he points out himself, is about films, so it doesn't apply here either. If we're going to apply standards specifically for films to an article about an upcoming television series, what's to stop us from applying those standards to other forms of entertainment, such as an upcoming-but-unreleased novel like Go Set a Watchman? The real standard that this article has to meet is the |general notability guideline, which specifies significant coverage in |reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This article meets all of those standards, and should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NFF||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: per the television corollary to |Hammer's Law
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER)

Comment: We have an announcement. That's all we have. We don't have a cast or plot summary. WP:TV doesn't tolerate this for the 60 or so pilots currently out waiting to be filmed and presented for the 2015-16 season and would delete an article for your average 'Untitled (some writer) project' immediately as a speedy. For instance ''How to Get Away With Murder'' was pretty much a lock from the moment Viola Davis was cast in it last year in February, but we still didn't establish the article until a day before ABC announced it, as is proper. We have no  for having an article here, and when a proper title and plot has been announced, then it can have an article; for now this should probably at most be redirected to the subject's article or Amazon Studios
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: Per . It's absurd for this to exist, at least until it's got a name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRISTAL)