Deletion of Bo Winegard

Comment: per the nomination and the above "delete" !votes. I don't think there's a case for , either (unimpressive citation profile, even when bulked up by Google Scholar's including non-peer-reviewed material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The firing is also in ''Inside Higher Ed'' https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/03/12/assistant-professor-says-hes-been-fired-because-he-dared-talk-about-human-population, which I think is a RS.  (I agree per nom that the sources currently in the article are not reliable.)  His GS citations are non-trivial, although I'd vote delete per  in the absence of the firing coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The Inside Higher Ed piece on its own isn't enough for , and the other sources are not reliable.  I looked through the citations for his top-cited pubs in GS, and didn't see cause for concern — if he manages to continue his academic career, he might eventually make . But we rarely keep assistant professors, and I don't see enough support for doing so here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NPROF)