Deletion of Semtex (drink)

Comment: Articles in New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/1995/11/09/world/what-s-next-in-this-line-scud-cola.html and Prague Post http://www.praguepost.com/archivescontent/20851-semtex-from-high-profile-explosive-to-high-energy-drink.html provide significant coverage, and help to cover the not inconsiderable issue over the name. Other sources like http://www.just-drinks.com/analysis/semtex-and-kamikaze-follow-red-bull-charge_id85897.aspx, http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Semtex+-+It'll+blow+your+mind.-a060652166, http://m.radio.cz/en/section/curraffrs/explosives-firm-weighs-steps-against-madonna-over-semtex can also be used to expand the article. It was banned in Russia http://www.foodnavigator.com/Financial-Industry/Russia-bans-Czech-energy-drinks, which should also be mentioned. It satisfies , and looks more like one of the most notable energy drinks rather than a non-notable one, and is the most notable Czech soft drink. There's every hope of expanding the article, and I'll do so over the next day or two
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)