Deletion of Aaron Kelley

Comment: per the individuality section of  - the only source provided is the subject's MySpace page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: as Nevhood says, the only link is to the subject's MySpace, hence no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to establish notability per . Delete unless appropriately sourced by the end of this AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: According the article, the individual in question is well known  to those who belong to a subculture in a particular locale, but after reading the external links given, that claim seems dubious. Writing a single Op-ed piece for a subculture magazine, or having supplied several sentences of quotations published in similiar publications, doesn't meet the bar raised by ; otherwise anyone could claim that getting their own Op-ed letter published in a newspaper would qualify themselves for inclusion.  Like the nominator for deletion, I too am suspicious of the circumstances of the anonymous deletion of the original db-bio tag (the only recent edit from that IP address), and several brand new accounts were apparently created for the sole purpose of defending or working on the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Non notable individual.  Article fails . Probable vanity, especially since his "friends" are jumping in to defend the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: fails . Being quoted in the paper isn't the same as being the subject of an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)