Deletion of Daniel Hernandez (intern)

Comment: for now.  While further events are |possible, at this point he's not a particularly public figure and publishing personal information is inadvisable.  His actions during the event can be covered in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: He seems to be an estimable young man, and will quite likely deserve a page in a few years, but for now it's 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This article fails ; no evidence of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The reliable source coverage isn't just about one event in which Hernandez played a role; the reliable source coverage that supports the topic meeting  concern's Hernandez role in the event (which is different from "one event in which Hernandez played a role") and who he is as a person - his life - that lead him to taking the actions he did. The reliable sources cover Hernandez well beyond the shooting - they go into great details about his entire life. The shooting turned the light on Hernandez and the reliable sources chose to extensively cover Hernandez's life rather than limit it to his role in the shooting. That justifies a Wikipedia article on Hernandez. Keep per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Unless |Mr. Hernandez goes on to do something else notable, for the rest of time, the article will merely consist of his actions in this one event and the followup. There is nothing in this article that could not be covered in 2011 Tucson shooting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: He's a remarkable person, and I have no doubt he'll deserve an article soon enough.  But, as you say, we don't base articles on "eventually".  |We are not in a hurry here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: the kudos of "Hero!" keep coming in -- from news media, President Obama, and now ethnic/gay news outlets.  He is likely to end up on the "Best of 2011" lists, and eventually, a political career.  I am listing only a ''weak keep'' because all of what I wrote is possibly conjecture per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per BLP1E, not redirect as it is unlikely someone will type "Daniel Hernandez (intern)" to search for this individual; an update of the disambiguation page for Daniel Hernández should be sufficient. He is mentioned by name for his actions in the main 2011 Tucson shooting article and may attain his own notability in the future, but alas, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: to 2011 Tucson shooting, although "delete" would be my second choice.  The redirect is consistent with the essay at , where persons famous for one event still get the "honor" (to the extent that having an article on Wikipedia is an honor of some sort) of having their name as a search term.  For that reason Christina Taylor Green, the little girl killed in the shooting, does not have her own article, but has a redirect to the event.  While I think that  is often misunderstood, it is appropriate in those cases where there would be no recollection of the person except in the context of the event.  Mr. Hernandez is one of many heroes, and the lack of his own separate article does not detract from that in any way
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per all of his coverage stemming from 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)