Deletion of Careers in climate change

Comment: Still has POV pushing in the article (basically, the insinuation that people only study climate change for the money.... and there's a strong risk of this article being used as a coatrack for that POV).  I've looked through the sources, and they talk about individual careers related to climate change, but not careers in climate change as a whole, thus tying them together presents a strong risk of .  I also note that we don't have ''any'' comparable articles on "Carreers in X."  suggests that shouldn't matter... but it seems strange to have an entire category of article not exist.  Similar articles seem to have found their way to the deletion bin of history:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_Careers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Careers_in_Optics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Careers_in_Mobile_App_Development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Career_domains_in_computer_science.  The main relevant policy cited in most of the previous debates is .  While Colapeninsula's sources make this a better case for retention than the previous cases, I feel the subject matter is not capable of breaking free from 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:OSE||WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a |careers advice website or a |directory for some, which those links above seem to support. I don't see how the term is notable as a standalone article - perhaps as a list but that might lead to a bunch of "Careers in..." pages, which goes back to my original argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Not notable as an independent topic, also a sign of . Compare Carreers in cell phone sales, Careers in flat screen TV manufacturing, and even Careers in Web Design
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)