Deletion of Sexual apartheid

Comment: per everyone above. Just someone trying to prove a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: this is POV fork for many articles on this subject already in wikipedia. The only reason for this and several "apartheid" articles created by {{3RRV|HOTR}} was to have the Dismabiguation page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid_%28disambiguation%29 in which  {{3RRV|HOTR}} can highlight the term "Israeli aparthide" in bold and hide the south africa era. All is part of an elborate scheme to make a oint (while disrupting wkipedia)  and turn wikipedia to what it is ot|not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:N)

Comment: It is indeed relevant. Pleas see oint
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: as above. This  is getting silly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: it would seem that the point of these unencyclopedic articles, which blatantly violates , is to justify the disambiguation page, so that WP readers will see right away that the Afrikaaner "Apartheid" can refer equally to Israel or South Africa, which ''just isn't true''.  Wikipedia is being disrupted to make a partisan political point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)