Deletion of Clone Manga

Comment: I looked for sources but was ultimately unable to find enough to show that either the artist or the website has enough notability to pass . In the end all we have is an endorsement by Fred Gallagher and the Joe Shuster Awards. Neither one is enough in and of themselves notable enough to keep the article based upon that alone. They both count towards notability but they're not enough to be so overwhelmingly notable that I'd say "absolute keep", and by this I mean specifically the awards. They're not non-descript awards but I don't really see where they're considered to be along the lines of an Eisner Award, for example. They give notability but not Notability, if that makes any sense. That being said, if someone could find a few more sources to show notability I'd be willing to change my vote, but offhand I couldn't really find where this webcomic is being covered in multiple independent and reliable sources. There's plenty of fan chatter, but not really in any formats that would count towards notability. I have absolutely no problem with someone wanting to userfy this content until more sources become available if this were to get deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A lack of any significant third party sources aside from brief mentions on the illusive awards website suggest this company has yet to break into any format that would have it meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)