Deletion of Tulāsana

Comment: No valid reasons for deletion have been listed, being a stub is not a reason to delete an article. "Notability outside the use of X" is not a valid reason for deletion either.  I know  only goes so far in an AfD discussion, but an example: It is difficult to establish the notability of List of Spider-Man enemies outside of Spider-Man.  The same can be said for hundreds, if not thousands of articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Wikipedia is | not a how-to guide, and some of these pages provide detailed instructions for performing the positions (e.g.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddhasana| 1, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matsyasana| 2, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supta_Virasana| 3.  The benefits of the positions are sometimes sourced and sometimes are not.  However, I think the asana article would benefit from a few concrete example positions with benefits that are reliably sourced
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP: NOTHOWTO)

Comment: as per our |Editing policy: '''"If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:EP)

Comment: These articles have been around for years"? That's exactly the problem. We have been far too lenient with this sort of thing. People dump some random text off the top of their head and we preserve it for years and years, afraid to get rid of it lest it ''could potentially'' have some unidentified factual or encyclopedic kernel. That's not how it works at all. Either fix the article ''now'', or delete it. It can always be recreated ''iff'' proper references ar given and  is met.  doesn't cut it. The burden of establishing notability lies entirely with whoever wishes to keep a given article. The default solution is redirection or deletion.  In the case of this asana cruft, this means: if the term can be substantiated as the name of an asana and nothing more, delete it and create a redirect it to List of yoga postures. Proving that a term exists falls very short of establishing that we need a standalone article about it. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. ANy time you wish to bring such an article to "reasonable standard", you are certainly welcome to go ahead. As long as nobody does, Wikipedia will be better off with this stuff gone and clean redirects to a list of asanas
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:OTHERCRAP)