Deletion of Viral email

Comment: and cleanup. Per Belovedfreak, this is a notable subject. |Afd is not cleanup, we don't delete when we have satisfying #Alternatives_to_deletion|alternatives. The article needs to be edited, true. A merge would be appropriate as a last resort, but there is enough material for en encyclopedic article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:DEL)

Comment: and '''redirect''' to computer virus or trojan horse (computing), which is what I though this would be about from the title.  Turns out it's more |sales talk about the prospect of endless riches by getting people to use email forwarding to propagate your advertising for you.  The article's text doesn't even say that, and neither defines the subject but contains only vague musings on viral advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: seems to have significant coverage in , therby passing |notability guidelines. There is an http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2004/dec/12/theobserver.theobserversuknewspages Observer article and http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&q=%22viral+email%22&btnG=Search+Books Google books mentions. Just because an article needs cleanup does not mean it should necessarily deleted. There are similar articles though: Viral marketing, Viral phenomenon, Viral video, Meme. Some merging may be in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)