Deletion of The Stentor

Comment: to Lake Forest College.&nbsp; Publications with online archives are of particular interest to researchers including Wikipedia editors.&nbsp; In the general case, a topic that fails wp:notability but has WP:RS primary sources and is already covered in the encyclopedia is not appropriate for AfD.&nbsp; So this nomination appears to be a case of , making the correct closure a speedy keep.&nbsp; This is confirmed by the fact that either the nominator knew that all of the links in the article were dead links and declined to mark them as dead links, or made no attempt to study this topic before bringing the topic to AfD.&nbsp; Nonetheless, I feel that the current article has severe content problems beyond wp:notability that bring it close to a situation that calls for deletion.&nbsp; I have marked the dead links, removed a bogus complaint that the topic failed to meet the Geography notability guideline, and removed a list of WP:BLP violations.&nbsp; I have also found online primary sources and upgraded the topic at Lake Forest College.&nbsp; Careful study of the list of archived newspapers for 2011/2012 shows that the claim in the current article that this "paper...still produces issues every Thursday" is not verifiable.&nbsp; Likewise, the current article IMO is filled with unsourced and unverifiable assertions that are likely to be insider WP:OR.&nbsp; I don't see that there is anything to merge, but I think the edit history is worth keeping as a reference.&nbsp; If this AfD is closed as a speedy keep, I expect to redirect the article.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)