Deletion of WHJG-LP

Comment: Per . No significant independent coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If the only reasoning that can be given for a keep is to blindly point at  and this argument is accepted, then outcomes like this will keep happening regardless of whether or not the topic is itself notable. Effectively whatever subtopic gets on  self-perpetuates its own existence from merely being on the list. The additions on that list don't contain examples or citations to even demonstrate the case; anyone who makes an addition to that essay (in good faith mind) is unlikely to be challenged because others will, most likely, not be familiar with it that topic area and so allow it.  is an essay, look closely at the header on the top of the page: "''Please defer to the relevant policy or guideline in case of inconsistency between that page and this one.''" What's a relevant policy guideline for an AfD? -REASON with the supplement guideline |WP:N. The only source that comes close to satisfying  is this brief in a local newspaper: http://rockrivertimes.com/1993/07/01/new-low-power-radio-stations-on-air/. This article is nowhere close to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:DEL||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per #Broadcast media.  A licensed station broadcasting its own content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: Per otability#General notability guideline, and what I said in my comments above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Per , "Notability can be established by either a large audience, established broadcast history, or unique programming." and this station is verifiably originating unique programming, satisfying the criteria. What you're perceiving as blind pointing is a just weariness of being asked to relitigate this issue every six weeks or so despite many years of broad consensus regarding licensed broadcast stations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST)

Comment: No, we aren't blindly pointing at anything.  There is strong, established consensus that radio station and television station articles are notable, so much so it is part of the Wikipedia Rulebook at .  Members of WP:WPRS are quite familiar with the radio station area of things and anyone could edit the WHJG-LP page, to say that can't or would be challenged isn't showing good faith (that AGF stuff) and is saying we are OWNing articles (untrue
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST)