Deletion of Carlo Masi

Comment: Fails both rof and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:IDONTLIKEIT|We don't judge why someone is notable, so long as they pass  because of . In this case, there is significant, ongoing coverage, in part because of the incongruity of a "porn star" becoming a math professor.  and April Fool's Day  are filled with such articles. As an adult actor, he was a big star in dozens of films, from a major adult film studio, and won top awards in his field (pardon the puns). As an academic, he would not normally be notable, but many academics become famous for controversy rather than publishing. His marriage/civil union was widely reported in almost every gay publication and web site
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ODD||WP:DYK)

Comment: but trim) per  based on sustained independent coverage. During Masi's porn career, he received coverage: https://www.xbiz.com/news/92090/colt-studio-renews-contract-with-adam-champ-and-carlo-masi ''XBIZ'' 2008 and https://avn.com/business/press-release/novelty/Carlo-Masi-Teams-With-Cal-Exotics-for-Casting-305954.html ''AVN'' 2009. In 2011, he was included in the book, ''Gay Porn Heroes: 100 Most Famous Porn Stars'' by J. C. Adams. When Masi transitioned into theater, he received coverage: https://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2010/09/07/masi-pornodivo-gay-per-beckett-interpreta-un.html ''la Repubblica'' 2010. Masi received the most coverage with his transition to academia: https://www.vanityfair.it/news/storie-news/2017/10/28/ruggero-freddi-porno-professore ''Vanity Fair ''2017 and https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/01/04/lecturer-ruggero-freddi-opens-up-about-his-adult-film-past/ ''Pink News'' 2018. His 2018 civil union/marriage was covered by the press: ''https://www.gaystarnews.com/article/gay-porn-star-math-teacher-honeymoon-carlo-masi/ Gay Star News'', ''http://www.ontopmag.com/article/42678/Gay_Porn_Stars_Carlo_Masi_Adam_Champ_Enter_Civil_Partnership_In_Italy On Top Magazine'', ''https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/05/01/gay-porn-stars-to-tie-the-knot-12-years-after-their-first-scene/ Pink News'', ''https://www.queerty.com/beefy-adult-film-stars-getting-hitched-12-years-shooting-first-scene-together-20180506 Queerty''.  In 2020, he is a subject of a book by {{Interlanguage link|Walter Siti|lt=|it||WD=}} https://www.illibraio.it/walter-siti-natura-innocente-1344009
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The sourcing...is not good. Out of the present 39 refs, around 15 are to Siti's book. While Siti is a great writer, this is not a straight biography; it would be described as a novelisation of someones life. An online review https://www.illibraio.it/walter-siti-natura-innocente-1344009/ google translates as "After all, “ what is a true story? Does the truth-novel exist? Truth has to do with science and jurisprudence, not with literature or with life ”. Which means that the question is irrelevant: that the two stories are more or less truthful, more or less exact in recalling the unfolding of the facts, the narration is authentic, thanks to that narrative voice that allows you to trace the origin of the speech in reality outside the text, without being bound to it. It is not reality that interests the writer..." It is literature rather than biography, seems to be listed as a novel at Amazon and so not , especially for a BLP. IMDB appears twice, and the subjects listing at the Adult Films Database (which seems to be as reliable a source as IMDB) is used as well. So half the references are to non reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: As stated above, there are reliable sources and sustained coverage beyond . Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: I have been on the fence about this one.  There are a lot of sources that look very reliable on the face of it, but even so I don't think notability is met. First, the person is clearly not notable as a performer (), second, he is clearly not notable as an academic (). So any notability will have to stem from  coverage in secondary sources, and there, I think  applies – there were a flurry of newspaper reports surrounding one event as discussed in the section "Media attention", but nothing more sustained.  As for the book, that clearly can't be used to verify any information given the fact that it is a fictionalised account. Even so, the fact that the person is the subject of (part of) a book is probably the strongest claim to notability – but I do not believe that that on its own makes him meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:NPROF||WP:ANYBIO||WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: If we judged this subject as an entertainer  they would fail. If we judged them as a academic  they would fail. The fact that they were both a non-notable entertainer and a non-notable academic does not somehow make them notable, no matter the contrast of the two occupations. There's been plenty of other newscycle stories about pornographic actors going on to work in a more humble or unexpected occupation. The uniqueness makes for a fun news story and that's why they got coverage, but Wikipedia is , nor is it a celebrity gossip site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:PROF||WP:NOTNEWS)