Deletion of VI Airlink (2nd nomination)

Comment: It appears to me that source 4 provided by Bushranger is different from reference 2 on the page. As such, that is 2 independent sources, and it passes . Is it a stub? Yes. Do we have sources to make it more than a stub? No. Do we have enough sources to keep the stub on Wikipedia? Yes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A quick Googling turns up additional sources: http://www.bvibeacon.com/1/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1700:economist-analyses-airport-proposal&catid=347:commentary-feb-23-2012, http://bvinews.com/bvi/congratulations-to-vi-airlink/, http://www.virginislandsnewsonline.com/news/local-airline-calls-for-level-playing-seeks-to-penetrate-us-market, http://www.bvibeacon.com/1/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1506:agreement-lets-vi-carrier-fly-to-us&catid=306:local-news-jan-6-2012. Being a "very minor" publication does not matter as long as it is |independent and reliable. Size of the fleet does not matter as long as it is a scheduled airline that meets the standards - which it does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)