Deletion of Christopher Jordan Dorner

Comment: as per  which states that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: This guy is obviously notable, passes , is reliably sourced, etc etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per RightCow and others.   still applies, and all of the varius "Keep" votes making arguments in the nature of "This man's story needs to be told!" or "This is valuable information!" does not reflect any Wikipedia policy, and are thus not valid as arguments for an AFD.  Special:Contributions/64.183.45.226|64.183.45.226
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The BBC have reported the search for this guy as California's largest ever manhunt. If that is true we should keep this. Also has outside US coverage. One of the main stories on tonight's ''BBC Six O'Clock News'' for example. This may fail , but it passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG||WP:EVENT)

Comment: Falls under . Subject/Suspect is notable, but is notable for one event. If 2013 Southern California shootings meets  sometime in the future, this article can be recreated as a |sub-article spinout of the parent article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:LIMIT||WP:SUBARTICLE)

Comment: per textbook case of 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Sorry, if Anders Behring Breivik|Breivik, James Eagan Holmes|Holmes, Jared Lee Loughner|Loughner can get a page, why can't Dorner? You may or may not see these guys in your textbook, but I urge you to actually read the  you linked ever so prominently as your basis for nomination. I do not see  being violated on the article, either. Next time think real hard before you make another nomination without basis. Thank you. Special:Contributions/24.7.227.169|24.7.227.169
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: You cannot  an article that has had subsequent discussion that is not unanimous. Delete and Keep are not the only outcomes of an AfD discussion as listed at . Furthermore, I have reverted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:XFD)