Deletion of Eternal Decision

Comment: despite good work on the sourcing, I don't think they meet any of the  criteria for encyclopedic notability.  Quite close though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: After careful consideration, I must agree with the nominator.  They exist, sure, but the issue is the notability criteria listed in usic.  They have released three albums, but none of those on a major label or recognized large indie label; Godfather records is described as a label they founded themselves.  As far as directories, these are considered to be works that provide only trivial coverage: release dates, titles, and so forth.  If the albums were released on a major label, or they had won a major award, or really any of the other criteria, that would be one thing, but the absence of any major coverage by a non-trivial published work trumps all other concerns in the meantime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)

Comment: No sources indicating that  has been met.  We can argue around in circles about "what else is their on the internet," but Wikipedia has clear guidelines about what constitutes notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: while some sources were found, only one is even potentially non-trivial (number 4), and that is a website of unknown reliability. Fails  currently, maybe come back in a year or two
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=ETERNAL|DECISION&sql=11:5xkqikkabb19~T1 AMG reference and http://artfortheears.freeservers.com/index2/interviews/edecision/edecision.htm independent interview seem enought to meet usic to me.  If the author does not mind, I'd like to go in and help clean up the references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)