Deletion of Hamza Tzortzis

Comment: It looks to me like he is remarkable for being hate monger and nothing more, which to me demonstrates a lack of notability. That being said, it may simply be a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Arguably borderline. I am aware of Hamza Tzortis due to his debate with Lawrence Krauss. He's also mentioned in several books, here https://books.google.com.au/books?id=HODJAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT109&dq=hamza+tzortzis&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipvLHg1cjNAhUDGJQKHRhMAW0Q6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q=hamza%20tzortzis&f=false, here https://books.google.com.au/books?id=yWrynhVHNggC&pg=PA182&dq=hamza+tzortzis&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipvLHg1cjNAhUDGJQKHRhMAW0Q6AEIRTAH#v=onepage&q=hamza%20tzortzis&f=false and here https://books.google.com.au/books?id=YxeiAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA127&dq=hamza+tzortzis&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipvLHg1cjNAhUDGJQKHRhMAW0Q6AEIJzAC#v=onepage&q=hamza%20tzortzis&f=false among others, although some of these appear at a glance to be dubious sources. I don't like the man, nor the ideas he represents, but, he appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  for being the focused topic of multiple bylined secondary sources.  Ironically, I could ''possibly'' accept the argument that ''some'' of these sources are not eligible for inclusion in the article themselves per , HOWEVER, inclusion in the article is not a requirement to survive AfD, merely existence.  Note that I'm not ''actually'' accepting the argument that these sources are not eligible, merely arguing that even in the case of successfully arguing their exclusion from the article, that they still firmly establish notability, due to their pervasiveness (there are a large number of RS's reporting on him) and extensiveness (each of the RS's are devoting quite a few words to him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP)