Deletion of Pat Robertson controversies

Comment: The article is |sourced and does not appear to have any  issues.  To merge this to the main article would cause the main article to be too large and is quite acceptable |on its own
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:POV||WP:N)

Comment: Presenting these attacks in isolation is contrary to |core policy.  Without the full context, the presentation is one-sided contrary to  and this is unacceptable in a |BLP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE||WP:BLP)

Comment: How is the article not just presenting stuff that he's gotten in trouble for?  states "'''Criticism''' and praise '''should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources'''" (emphasis mine). For attack pages it says "Pages that are '''unsourced and negative in tone''', and which may disparage the subject, should be deleted," (emphasis mine, the article neutrally reports the negative reactions Robertson has gotten, with reliable secondary sources).  and  do not require, insist, or even support us kissing any article subject's butt. The article simply reports that much of the media has disapproved of much of Pat Robertson's behavior, and presents individual cases as examples. The only reason to remove this page would be to |give equal validity for his supporters, which isn't something that we're required to do
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BLP||WP:GEVAL)

Comment: Criticism/controversy articles of  subjects should be avoided.  Work any noable criticism into the body of the main article; if cries of "it's too long!" come up, then that is probably a sign that |undue weight is being given to the criticism.  This is an encyclopedia, not a laundry list of every single occurrence of someone objecting to something that Pat Robertson said or did
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: per Carrite, 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I think this is a . It is probably not a good idea to have an article that only shows negative aspect of someone's life. Any useful info here should be summarized and merge to the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)