Deletion of Australia–Kosovo relations (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per nom, per gingerbomb, per Mandsford, and per my reasoning rticles for deletion/Australia–Kosovo relations|last time. This topic fails the |general notability guidelines: there are no independent, third party sources that cover this topic directly and/or in detail. Yes, there are scattered news media references to Australia's handling of the Balkans war, and yes Cdog has done as job as could be done |synthesizing them into a treatment of the subject; but no, this is not a proper way to build an encyclopedia (which is supposed to be a tertiary source). The subject matter is best handled in International recognition of Kosovo and Foreign_relations_of_Australia. (For the record I notified on this AfD on my userpage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:GNG||WP:SYN)

Comment: Solely on the basis that Kosovo is not a country and that I suspect articles like this might be trying to make the case that it is, in violation of . We don't have, for example, Australia-California relations. On the other hand, there was considerable scope in Australia's foreign policy regarding Kosovar refugees at the time of the NATO conflict. I don't think anyone would make the case that now, or any time recently, there ''has'' been a significant relationship between the two entities. I would vote differently on other "* relations" articles, especially those where a demonstrable and verifiable current relationship (or current antagonism, for that matter) exists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)