Deletion of Assault of the Killer Bimbos

Comment: Definitely! If ''Roger Ebert'' had reviewed it, it ''must'' be notable. But seriously, it definitely passes  and the more specific . Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILM)

Comment: per meeting  and .. perhaps because of the silliness of the title. Heck, even Roger Ebert found in worth reviewing in ''Chicago Sun-Times''.http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/assault-of-the-killer-bimbos-1988  And it is also nicely covered in such as ''The Day (New London)|The Day'',http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=giAiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=KnIFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3558,615684&dq=assault-of-the-killer-bimbos&hl=en and ''Sydney Morning Herald'',http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=yytWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=uuQDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3227,9666487&dq=assault-of-the-killer-bimbos&hl=en and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Assault+of+the+Killer+Bimbos%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1'''quite''' a few others.  Yes, the current article is in rough shape... but (sorry DC) we do not toss notable film topics simply because they are in |rough shape or if we ''think'' the film unremarkable... specially '''if''' |due diligence shows the article meets |the primary notability guideline and is thus improvable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:UGLY||WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)

Comment: It has been reviewed in multiple places, as indicated in the article, in this AfD, and on Rotten Tomatoeshttp://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/assault_of_the_killer_bimbos/reviews/, and therefore meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)