Deletion of Ronen's correlations

Comment: When one looks at how well the references that he lists are cited (by authors other than himself) it doesn't appear that the concept is being applied or commented upon by the relevant scientific community to any signifigant extent. On top of that, the article doesn't even specify what the relationships/correlations are making the article not much more than a vanity page (although to be fair, he doesn't call it '''Ronen's correlation''' in his papers). Not |notable enough for a Wikipedia article in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as an |original neologism and as |non-notable pseudo-science. Erik the
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTE)

Comment: The term may get picked up by the scientific establishment but so far it is pure |OR/neologism. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: for similar ,  and  concerns as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronen's number|Ronen's number. --  JediLofty
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:COI)