Deletion of Emad Rahim (2nd nomination)

Comment: Throwing this out there, paid editing notwithstanding, but if he fails , what about 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I disagree that a visiting distinguished entrepreneur position satisfies .  A visiting title like that does not necessarily make someone an academic high-flyer.  It appears that he only got his doctorate in 2009.  It appears that his scholarly work has only been cited 28 (!) times--that is really low http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=77M8J78AAAAJ&hl=en.  On balance, he does not appear to be notable as an academic.  More to the point, the re-creation of a paid, promotional article, and the involvement of two SPAs, makes it obvious that this is a non-disclosed paid article, in violation of the Terms of Use https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#4._Refraining_from_Certain_Activities.  To me, that is the most important reason to delete, and to block these SPAs.  I have no idea whether this is Morning277, that is besides the point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Does fail , incidentally with the aggravating circumstance that his http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=77M8J78AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao own GS page takes credit for work he did not author. But more importantly, per my preceding comment, he does not pass  based on his life accomplishments and non-academic career either. '''Salt''' seems to be justified too, as this is an extreme case of  at best, and the editor and re-creation history implies that this will otherwise be a recurring problem
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:BIO||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)