Deletion of Kitty May Ellis

Comment: it sounds like {{user|Wjhonson}} has a lot invested in this article, and therefore the lines of  are being blurred. Is it appropriate for someone transcribing diaries (that are not currently published) to start an wikipedia article on the same topic? Wikipedia cannot be a place to publish primary sources, and we cannot be the first place to write on a topic. We also get into  issues. In all honesty, this sounds like genealogy work being published for the first time here. There is a fine line between notable history and genealogy, but : Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, including genealogy entries. This article to me sounds like something more appropriate for
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:NOT)