Deletion of Vanossgaming

Comment: I originally created the article, but has since then been discussed many times to be deleted. I do not quite understand why, since his channel is greatly discussed in the YouTube community, but as said it is new compared to the other channels in the top 20. This is why he is not mentioned on many websites yet, so many references are missing. Also, I am a fan of him, and this said the article was pretty much made from a fan point of view, and in the talk page I mentioned it could be slightly edited. He does not fail  since, as said, he is highly ranked in the YouTube community and he does not fail  either, since the websites showing his statistic are licensed and highly reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: This is a pretty borderline case. In addition to the Kotaku reference mentioned above, http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/222136/gamasutra_explains_the_youtuber_.php this source and http://www.vg247.com/2014/07/30/gta-online-1-16-money-glitch-stop-banning/ this source do manage to show ''some'' degree of notability. That being said, the "significant coverage" requirement of  hasn't quite been met yet (though I might change my !vote if more sources are found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He may be popular in the YouTube crowds, but he doesn't have the coverage to meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and . I have only been able to find trivial coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: There isn't enough |significant coverage from |reliable, |independent sources (|?) to sustain an article about this YouTuber. The best hits in a /RS|video game reliable sources search were passing mentions from http://www.vg247.com/2014/07/30/gta-online-1-16-money-glitch-stop-banning/ VG247 and http://kotaku.com/players-turned-a-gta-online-glitch-into-a-deadly-game-1614041913 Kotaku—not nearly enough for a full article, nevertheless a blurb or section somewhere else. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:42||WP:VG)

Comment: Article fails to meet  or any other notability guideline. http://www.lazygamer.net/video/the-top-10-gaming-youtubers-in-2014-so-far/ This is the only thing even approaching a reliable source that would meet , and there's no significant coverage in it about the subject. All the other references in the article are sites that chart views and subscriber data which fall under  and, regardless, have no context or significance for the subject in terms of showing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:USERG)