Deletion of Horse Isle (game)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM)

Comment: per above, which is essentially 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PROBLEM)

Comment: From some brief scrounging I don't think there's enough unique, secondary, credible sources to make the game "notable"--the expired news article doesn't inspire notability from the brief snippet provided, and a mediocre review from an obscure editor on a small review site is questionably credible (same with the linked GameOgre review of one paragraph from an anonymous reviewer). The article appears to be an advertising vehicle and composed almost entirely of original research and opinion (reviews--understandable for a game, but as a source of research...?). A brief "search engine test" to see what sort of information is out there on this game seems to be mostly people looking for help in the game, with the occasional blog post review. Is there enough credible sources out there to make it notable by Wikipedia's guidelines, especially  (as it is a web-based game)? The whole article needs a rewrite if kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)