Deletion of Air Canada Flight 018 Stowaway Incident

Comment: I performed some cleanup of the article - and added sections and s. Outcome of arrests and Mr. X. The incident was international  reported in the press around the world, http://www.nationalterroralert.com/young-man-in-old-man-disguise-boards-international-flight/ and even necessitated a Terror alert from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Notability is not temporary and this incident is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GEOSCOPE)

Comment: per , fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: There's enough international coverage over a long-enough period of time to convince me that we have sufficient  coverage out there to write a stand-alone article about it. E.g., https://www.reuters.com/article/us-imposter/young-canada-asylum-seeker-was-disguised-as-old-man-idUSTRE6A44LS20101105 Reuters 2010, https://www.economist.com/gulliver/2010/11/09/a-master-of-disguise The Economist 2010, http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/11/04/canada.disguised.passenger/index.html CNN 2010, http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/11/08/young-asian-man-disguises-himself-as-old-and-boards-a-plane/ Time 2010, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/hongkong/8249973/Eight-arrested-over-flight-Hollywood-disguise.html Telegraph (UK) Jan 2011, http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41539219/ns/world_news-asia_pacific/t/disguised-chinese-asylum-seeker-freed-canadian-custody/#.Xb-I_y2ZN25 AP (via NBC) Feb 2011, https://www.news.com.au/world/verdict-in-old-man-disguise-case/news-story/83511e3f63975d7a3ed66a84f80f8ce4 AFP (via News.com.au) Oct 2011, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/hongkong/8832028/Hong-Kong-conviction-over-old-man-plane-disguise.html Telegraph (UK) again Oct 2011, https://www.sify.com/news/hong-kong-airport-worker-jailed-in-disguise-ruse-news-others-lksi4vceedesi.html AP (via Sify) again Oct 2011, https://books.google.com/books?id=q3LzAgAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&dq=%22air+canada%22+%22vancouver%22+%22hong+kong%22+%222010%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s McFarland book 2014, http://www.thestandard.com.hk/section-news.php?id=204034&sid=22053489 The Standard (HK) 2019
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I want to reiterate the delete !vote I cast above before more sources had been added to the article - in spite of the , this still fails  (minor spattering of coverage around the time of the incident, minor spattering of coverage around the time of conviction). It's not enduringly notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per persuasive arguments by {{u|Lightburst}}. Pithy delete !votes citing  without elaboration are not persuasive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: classic case of . Trivial incident, no lasting effects. The news media covered it for its novelty, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: I have reviewed you changes and, while that has improved the article and is appreciated, it has not changed the basic issue that the story behind it is . We are in "cat stuck in tree - rescued by fire dept" territory here. Sure it made the newspapers, it still doesn't belong in an encyclopedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)