Deletion of Comparison of the AK-47 and M16

Comment: There is no way to write this article without violating  as the entire premise is opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I keep seeing people say "I like it", but (ie: ) clearly states that this is a non-argument for keep.  I still don't see anyone clearly explaining how it won't violating , and  other than to make generalized and unsubstantiated claims, OR to accept sources as reliable that would never be considered reliable in any other discussion.  I find it hard to believe that world.guns.ru and www.ak-47.us would *really* be considered reliable as defined by policy here.  I have yet to see anyone actually address THESE main issues with more than generalization and unsubstantiated claims, and I can't see how you can keep ANY article when it has this many issues
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKE||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: unless sources can be found.  As it stands, this borders on , as there are only two sources listed that actually purport to compare the two weapons (I say purport because I've never seen the documentary listed).  The rest of the article is a compilation of facts relating to each rifle that are put together to make a "comparison", plus  some of the editor's commentary ("The AK-47 is generally considered a less accurate rifle.").  I think it's possible that there is some actual scholorly work on this topic, but without it, I think this has to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)