Deletion of Isha Ambani

Comment: Hello. I believe the article deserves to be kept at present. She has been listed by https://www.forbes.com/pictures/fdgk45hkkf/isha-ambani-23-india-2/#4925683655a6 Forbes, as mentioned, and has also been covered across several verifiable independent publications such as https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/12/09/beyonce-hillary-clinton-vip-guests-go-india-isha-ambani-wedding/2258171002/ USAToday, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/jio-was-first-seeded-by-isha-ambani-in-2011-reveals-dad-mukesh/articleshow/63329391.cms Economic Times, etc. She clearly passes  and  and this suggests that keeping the page is the best course of action. Also, considering the page views that this has received recently, it is fair to say that her notability is not in question. I do, however, believe that the page can be further built upon, which is something that can be looked at. Special:Contributions/2402:3A80:6A6:E213:28AF:20F9:C820:2AC3|2402:3A80:6A6:E213:28AF:20F9:C820:2AC3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: This is one of those articles, similar to one I just nominated elsewhere, which at first glance looks well-sourced and legitimate. Digging deeper into the sources, though, shows they are simply incidental mentions and  coverage including lightly paraphrased press releases from outlets of questionable quality. Another case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:REFBOMBING)