Deletion of Robert Clayton Matthews

Comment: clearly unnotable per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: What part of the basic criteria for notability from , "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject," am I failing to meet?  I am starting with two published secondary sources: http://books.google.com/books?id=rzROAAAAMAAJ The semi-centennial alumni record of the University of Illinois, pp. 167-168; and the http://www.tbp.org/pages/About/InformationBook/InfoBook.pdf 2009 Tau Beta Pi Information Book.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: There is no guideline that some organization naming an award after someone automatically makes him notable. Does not appear to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)