Deletion of Math 55

Comment: Except for coverage from the Harvard Crimson (a student newspaper), there's little there that constitutes non-trivial coverage. The outside sources only give it a mention in the context of particular discussion topics. Thus, I conclude this fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Secondary sources exist (I've added four) demonstrating , the hardest course at the most prestigious American university counts for something, and OT#PAPER
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT)

Comment: given the |verifiable and |reliable sources provided.  Some of them are a bit of a stretch as they don't mention the subject at all but even removing them leaves several good references that are clearly applicable. Merging to an appropriate article would also be acceptable to me.  I also take issue with many of the arguments presented above for deletion as they don't seem to be based in any policy or guideline but merely assertions of opinion (a fancy way of saying "I don't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)