Deletion of Investing.com

Comment: I see no evidence that this meets either the GNG or pertinent notability criteria for websites.  The keep proponents haven't advanced a reason to avoid deletion beyond .  It is not enough to claim that a website is noteworthy; one must have genuine ''evidence'' that it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSIMPORTANT)

Comment: Per reasons above. Article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Agree with User: Devokewater. SimilarWeb says the website is the 244th most popular website in the world. https://www.similarweb.com/website/investing.com/ Alexa says the website is the 186th most popular website in the world.https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/investing.com. Wikipedia does have the Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|Wikipedia ignore all rules rule so that reasonableness can prevail over  Wikipedia's |independent, third party sources rule. Due to competition from the internet, many newspapers and colleges are closing so Wikipedia should not be overly reliant on journalists/academics. In addition, the website does have articles by Techcrunch, Venturebeat and Business Insider on it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)