Deletion of New subcontinent

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: The page creator removed the AfD template, I've restored it. Time for some |snow? -SpacemanSpiff
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Both versions would appear to be |opinionated |original proposals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: as |original research, |soap box and per |common sense and |Himalayan snow. -SpacemanSpiff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:COMMON||WP:SNOW)

Comment: as mainly an opinion post. A neutral article about separationalist struggles and border disputes in the region is cool. An opinion-based essay in violation of  and  is not cool enough to prevent this |snowball from melting. I'll change my mind if the article is named to better describe it's subject, and the content is found notable and rewritten with sources to a neutral, factual text about the subject, but I don't think this article has anything seriously worth salvaging. Also, I haven't checked, but there are most likely articles about all significant separationalist movements in the area, in which case this one would be redundant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:NOR||WP:SNOW)