Deletion of Ebrahim Bagheri

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: An h-index of 22 is respectable. In some fields (e.g., pure mathematics), I'd consider that by itself a pass of #C1
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The citation record shows that he was one of five coauthors of a heavily used data set, and not much else. The Canada Research Chair is tier 2; if it were tier 1 it would probably be enough. Nothing else of significance has turned up since the start of the AfD. So he's close on a couple of points of #C1, but I'd prefer to see a clear pass of one than a near miss of two
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I'm still not convinced that his https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5356528 single highly-cited paper is sufficient for notability. I'll admit that >1000 citations is a ton. But there are still a number of issues. To start, this line of work is not mentioned in his article. If this paper has had such a large impact in the field, shouldn't his article have something to say about it? Further, if this paper establishes Bagheri's notability, it should do the same for his co-authors. But they do not have articles. Now, neither of this issues necessarily means we should delete this page. But I think we need to look a little further into this paper and see ''why'' it has so many citations. Has it really |made significant impact in this scholarly discipline or is it just routinely cited when other researchers use the same data set?On an unrelated note, an IP editor has added the text "Both Canada Research Chair and NSERC Industrial Chair appointments are competitive and highly prestigious national appointments made by the Government of Canada. At the time of appointment, Dr. Bagheri was among only another 13 faculty members in Canada to concurrently hold both national chairs." to the article since the AfD opened. This is both unsourced and unconventional claim to fame. I am still unconvinced that either chair is an notable position, and I don't see how holding both at the same time is more notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: I cant add any more. If there is no coverage at all, then he fails , even if he is notable enough for an article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Let's go through 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)