Deletion of Tiles of the Hold (2nd nomination)

Comment: into Magic in the Malazan Book of the Fallen (probably along with every other article in the ''Magic'' section of Template:MBF), a description of these would obviously be relevant to the main subject but the main body of this article is unnecessary #PLOT|plot detail which does not contribute to an encyclopaedic understanding of the topic
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: no |reliable sources sufficient to establish |notability for this thoroughly unencyclopedic list about the minute details of a fantasy series
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTE)

Comment: How can you have a "Keep" argument that says the subject is not notable? No reliable third party sources address the subject. The only source is from the book itself. There is no policy or guideline basis for a keep argument. The good faith of the editor not withstanding. As the source for this is the book itself, this is  at best. There is no point in userfying this. The quality of the keep arguments here astounds me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)