Deletion of Stars in astrology

Comment: it's now a |fringe topic, but up through Isaac Newton's occult studies|Isaac Newton's day it was quite the notable topic.  This is a well-cited article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: I have expanded the Stars in astrology page with a very brief and sketchy set of introductory paragraphs that surely can be expanded at some length.  While I was in the process of expanding it, the page was moved from under me to List of stars in astrology.  I was trying to add text to make the article more than just a list of stars.  Now we have two separate articles.  My inclination would be to '''delete''' List of stars in astrology as a less developed |content fork of the page now at Stars in astrology.  But now the history may be muddled
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: The subject of fixed stars in astrology has easily been the subject of http://www.google.com/search?q=fixed+stars+in+astrology&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a#q=fixed+stars+in+astrology&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7caa2b99db8bf4b5&biw=1280&bih=852 entire books studied by astrologers.  The fact that the article is currently in a poor state is not in itself grounds for deletion.  Astrological beliefs about stars are a matter of historical record.  The belief that information about astrological beliefs about stars is "pseudoscience" is itself evidence of |positivist bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)