Deletion of NWF Kids Pro Wrestling: The Untold Story

Comment: There's no substantial coverage from secondary sources or national critics. As for the minor awards,  is pretty clear on this in a footnote: "This criterion is secondary. Most films that satisfy this criterion already satisfy the first criterion." So without satisfying the first criterion of substantial coverage, it's not notable enough for its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FILMNOT)

Comment: Have a look at the criteria at .  The minor awards and trivial coverage afforded this film clearly do not meet the high WP standards for film notability.  Also be aware that this is part of a  of related articles created by a  to proliferate M on the project.  The other articles are also up for deletion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pro_Wrestling_Kids%27_Stylehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shawn_Crossen  In all three AfDs thus far, the only voice voting keep has come from an anonymous ISP that geolocates to the subject's hometown, thus perpetuating the  that led to the creation of the three articles in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FILMNOT||WP:WG||WP:SPA||WP:SPAM||WP:COI)

Comment: The Better Business Bureau, in its attempts to determine whether the Dove Foundation actually constitutes a charity and therefore deserves non-profit status, has this to say about stonewalling from the organization on this and other issues: "failure to participate may demonstrate a lack of commitment to transparency. Without the requested information, the Alliance cannot determine if this charity adheres to the Standards for Charity Accountability" http://www.bbb.org/charity-reviews/national/children-and-youth/dove-foundation-in-wyoming-mi-1359.  The Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance attempts to ascertain which charities really are charities, rather than for-profit organizations, so that people can determine whether or not they'd care to make a donation.  The relevance here is that Shawn Crossen is a vanity-press author, which means that he is willing to open his checkbook at any time and pay others in an attempt to purchase notability.  Since we cannot determine how the Dove Foundation handles revenue flows, we have no idea if they are in the business of selling review space to authors who are willing to pay for attention.  Since there is a huge cloud over this source, I think there are enough red flags for us not to consider it as 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)