Deletion of Belgium–Mexico relations

Comment: Factoids gathered through 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Per Collect. WIkipedia is |not and indiscriminate collection of information. Per  we need significant coverage of the topic (topic = Belgium-Mexico relations) in reliable, independent, secondary sources to justify an article. We don't have that. We have a collection of sources, but none of them address the topic of these countries bilateral relations directly or in detail as required by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am at this point firmly convinced that in-depth coverage doesn't exist to establish notability for the topic of Belgium-Mexico relations. Not notable per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Yes, filling Wikipedia with directory listings about non-notable things absolutely harms the project. The preceding is an  argument that we can't delete a crappy article if other similar crappy articles are still around. The end result would be a descending spiral into crappiness. Supaman89 should feel free to nominate any of the named articles if he cannot find |reliable sources which discuss the bilateral relations of the two countries. In the case of Belgium and Mexico, there are some interesting 19th century historical tidbits about a Belgian woman who was empress of Mexico, but that is covered in the article about her, and is not enough to sustain this article.  Thre do not appear to be enough reliable and independent sources covering the bilateral relations as such, and they are not that closely tied by trade
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:RS)