Deletion of Armorize Technologies

Comment: From our perspective, press releases about financing deals don't show enough importance to make a business notable, even if "trivial" was a poor choice of words. Every business that gets that kind of capital does not become an encyclopedia subject automatically.  The InfoWorld article is indeed telling: it's about a "startup company" that "could change" an aspect of online security; this suggests only that they |might be notable in the future, but may not be yet.  Investment reports may be reliable sources, but the businesses and researchers that write them are driven by customer demand, rather than an editorial judgment of significance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: The http://www.infoworld.com/t/business/startups-bloom-despite-economy-085?page=0,0 InfoWorld article provides insignificant coverage of Armorize Technologies, and a http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Armorize+Technologies%22 Google News Archive search returns only press releases and passing mentions. This company fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)