Deletion of The Perth Group

Comment: passes  quite easily; note extensive discussion in Seth Kalichman's ''Denying AIDS'', probably one of the best books on AIDS denialism; there are two multi-page discussions of the PG and their beliefs http://books.google.ca/books?id=_mtDBCDwxugC&pg=PA179#v=onepage&q&f=false, http://books.google.ca/books?id=_mtDBCDwxugC&pg=PA60#v=onepage&q&f=false, and there are more discussions in google books alone http://books.google.ca/books?id=_FHpPXoRulAC&pg=PA106#v=onepage&q&f=false, http://books.google.ca/books?id=TABFzo0FSdUC&pg=PA46#v=onepage&q&f=false, http://books.google.ca/books?id=Svo-OMjhXiYC&pg=PA37#v=onepage&q&f=false, then we've got google news http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/nossal-attacks-hiv-sceptics/story-e6frg6nf-1111112910341, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/hiv-deniers-a-joke/story-e6frg6nf-1111112942642, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/hiv-experts-line-up-to-refute-denier/story-e6frg8y6-1111112922612, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/hiv-experts-line-up-to-refute-denier/story-e6frg8y6-1111112922612, http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/judge-dismisses-claim-hiv-does-not-exist/2007/04/27/1177459969110.html, and my fancy-shmancy HighBeam account turns up more http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-81529240.html, and google scholar has some more https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-0-387-79476-1_3.  It's obvious nonsense, but it's notable nonsense that needs to be expanded and debunked
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)