Deletion of List of celebrated domes

Comment: Completely unsourced list.  Without any sources establishing what a "celebrated dome" is or why these entries meet that criteria, this is complete  and should be removed accordingly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I believe  is most relevant. It states "'''Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or membership criteria) should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources.'''". As it stand this is very ambiguous, subjective, and not supported by reliable sources. As for the idea of changing the criteria to "notable" then we are simply duplicating a category. I think that the topic itself does not meet our criteria and as such changes to the article are unlikely to resolve this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: Unadulterated, distilled 100% |original research. Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: List criteria can be subjective per . Editorial choices what to include or exclude from Wikipedia is subjective. We are making subjective decisions all the time. The real problem is the florid title "celebrated"; and lack of sources to establish notability - but they are all blue link with sources available; and the article can be renamed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)