Deletion of Erika Tham

Comment: Actresses are not automatically handed a free pass over  just because they've had roles — ''every'' actor has ''always'' had roles, because having roles is the job description. The notability test for actors and actresses is not in the mere listing of roles, but in the quality and depth and range and volume of |reliable source coverage in ''media'' that they ''received'' for having roles. That's not what these references are, however: of the six footnotes present here, four are unreliable sources that do not count as support for notability ''at all'', and the two that are technically reliable sources both just namecheck her existence a single time in articles that are not ''about her''. That is not how you get an actress over the Wikipedia inclusion bar, if the notability claim you're shooting for is "actress who has acted" rather than "actress who has won a notable acting award
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:RS)

Comment: as ) to Make It Pop since that is her only major role.  also applies since she is a minor
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: So far, ''Make It Pop'' is her only role that has gotten some minor notice. She might fully qualify for a Wikipedia article if her role in ''Kim Possible'' earns significant media notice that is about her in particular. For now, it is |too soon for an article but that may change in the not-too-distant future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: to Make It Pop since that is a significant role. No reason has been given a need to delete when this |alternative has been presented and is entirely valid
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)