Deletion of Steve Scherf

Comment: The only valid reason for deletion cited by the nom is lack of notability determined by google hits. However |our notability policy states, notability can be determined if (as one example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: a review of the pages http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22steve+scherf%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Search indexed by Google (of which, only about 330 are unique—Google's hit estimates are usually high) doesn't indicate any articles focusing on Scherf, just on his companies.  Notability guidelines recommend multiple, independent reviews whose primary subject ''is the individual''.  While Scherf's CDDB and Gracenote contributions may just border on being "''part of the enduring historical record in his specific field''" (see ), most of his notability is covered in the company articles and, if deemed notable enough, '''possibly a redirect''' could be used. Still, I lean primarily toward a deletion, since someone doing a Wikipedia search for him will find him in those articles anyway. As a final note, it might be interesting to observe that almost half of the unique Google hits (about 150 of the 330) relate to a specific news story, as evidenced in http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22steve+scherf%22+-wikipedia+%22record+straight%22&btnG=Search this Google search
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)