Deletion of Daniel Mulhern

Comment: has its own claim to notability. However, I must disagree that being a spouse of an executive office holder of a sub-national unit is automatic notability. One must evaluate each person on their merits, this is kind of a special case of "notable for a single event". Like in those cases, the spouse should be part of the main article, until which time notability allows for a . Of course, spouses of ''national'' executive office holders are probably automatically notable, even where the role has no legal standing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: Yes, I think there is sufficient grounds to warrant an article for the spouse of each sitting governor of a U.S. State. The person who holds the position of First Lady/First Gentlemen of any U.S. state passes the criteria for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The spouse of the sitting governor of a U.S. State is a position unto itself, with a specific role and duties, and a notable one at that. He more than meets the criteria for . Should we delete everyone on this list :Category:Spouses of United States state governors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: No they're not but these people are notable simply because they are spouses of Governors, i.e., First Ladies or First Gentlemen of their respective state. This is a significant public position that passes the criteria for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)