Deletion of Henry the Green Engine

Comment: if possible. There is some information here to preserve. Some of it is about the story that Henry appears in and not on topic. But the Washington Post article does cover some interesting facts about Henry. I agree this isn't enough to establish |notability but it is worth 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PRESERVING)

Comment: per the above analysis. Unless more sources are presented, this fails . I'd recommend that if the Fandom is insufficient to ask an admin to temporarily restore any deleted page history so it can be transwiki'd
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence of notability like the rest of the characters from the series, through this one at least attempts to discuss some controversies related to two episodes the character appears in. However, the controversies are related to the episodes and not really to this character, so if sources are found (one of the sections has no sources), the odds are they won't be  of much help, but do ping me if you think otherwise. The best I can see here for salvaging is that if said sources are found, maybe the mentioned episodes could get stand-alone articles? Regarding the proposed merge, there is little to  merge as most of the article is still unreferenced plot summary aka , through I have no major objections to a merger if anyone wants to carry it out (just don't dump irrelevant info in a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: per {{U|Archrogue}}. |Notoability is not inherited, but preservation of sources and information are always welcome
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)