Deletion of Mama grizzly

Comment: It's a mother mammal's instinct to protect her young that is being invoked, not other aspects of brown bear character.) Having said that, the fact that Mrs. Palin endorsed some candidates ''should'' be given in her article, the articles on each candidate, and the article on the election. The expression itself does not have lasting importance, and even if it did it's not the job of Wikipedia to report that ''have an article on the expression itself.'' ikipedia is not a dictionary. ''It could be mentioned in Palin's article when the endorsements are mentioned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: It actually makes a big difference, as it shows that others are using the term. Yes, she inspired the term, but the more people use it the more |notability the term receives
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It's a term which has a coherent definition and appeared in several |reliable sources independent of Sarah Palin.  There's plenty of precedent for articles on political slang and slogans like Change we can believe in or if you like it more historical, Massachusetts Miracle.  With little effort I could find a dozen more of such usages in Wikipedia -- and many nevertheless could be called neologisms.  Regarding the nom: it passes  -- and in an obvious way since third party sources are using the term - which is the test for inclusion, and the  failure is merely asserted and not demonstrated.  Also, some of the ''Delete'' arguments are actually suggestions for ''improvement'' of the article, which is a strange way to support a proposal to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NEO||WP:N)

Comment: Please note that |Notability is not temporary. If it's notable today, it is considered notable forever
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: Political neologisms do appear in Wikipedia, such as Triangulation (politics)  (do you really want me to cite a dozen?)  The test, as explained in  is third-party usage, which is clearly evidenced in the article itself.  Gov. Palin is not using the term alone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)