Deletion of Atop the Fourth Wall (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is a case where Wikipedia's notability standards creak at the seams. While there may be little coverage in traditional sources to establish notability, in the world of the Internet this is one of the things that "everybody knows it", and is discussed widely. The trouble is do we  on that basis - that the article is likely to be something people are looking for information on having heard about it on the Internet? I'd say yes, even thought that's a borderline  argument; but of course, your mileage may vary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:ITSUSEFUL)

Comment: Nothing on google as a reliable coverage, nothing in google books or news. Does not meet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEBCRIT)

Comment: Does not meet . I searched around and could find no evidence of secondary-source coverage aside from the limited, insignificant coverage mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: yeah, not a comic but a web series about comics. That said, I can't see any evidence it is a |notable web series. I couldn't find any sources that could be used to establish notability, but if
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)