Deletion of Loren Cordain

Comment: because of an invalid deletion rationale (it is so far from being true that it is difficult to believe the nominator actually did any searching for sources). Easily passes  for highly cited publications,  for well-known books, and  for heavy mainstream media coverage of his efforts to promote the paleo diet. In fact, the difficulty with finding sources is not that there is too little but that there is too much, making it difficult to find the ones that are sufficiently reliable and cover Cordain himself in non-trivial detail. But they are definitely out there: see http://articles.latimes.com/1997-01-23/local/me-21305_1_stone-age https://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/19/health/vital-signs-nutrition-but-what-did-the-cow-have-for-lunch.html https://www.denverpost.com/2011/06/19/csu-professor-goes-online-to-defend-the-caveman-diet/ https://www.coloradoan.com/story/life/2014/05/04/csu-professor-dishes-writing-paleo-diet/8663937/. One doesn't have to believe in the validity of the paleo diet to recognize that one of its main proponents is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: He publishes in the highly pop field of human nutrition. Has 20 papers with over 100 GS cites, Enough for rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)