Deletion of Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present)

Comment: The article is essentially a collection of daily press briefings by the Ukranian and LNR/DNR sides (the reliability of either side being rather poor). The conflict is not covered by SECONDARY  at anything close to the the level of detail present in the article. This perhaps belongs in WikiSource or something similar - we are essentially hosting a collation of  accounts (the daily press releases). There are also NPOV issues in the presentation. In terms of policy rationale for deletion - this is a  and  fail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTSTAT)

Comment: The RfC discussion is far from over, so hardly any "way to improve the article" could have been found (or not) yet. The timeline, as the proposer acknowledges, is based almost exclusively upon daily military reports from both sides involved in the conflict, therefore this is not a case of , since the narrative mirrors sources which provide concise information (weaponry, locations, number of ceasefire violations and casualties). Wikipedia policy is aimed to "statistics that lack context or explanation", as you can see at . Sources don`t need to be "independent"; see , where it reads "...reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject." Counterbalance is the best way to achieve neutrality in some cases, it has been already discussed at the RfC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE||WP:DISCRIMINATE||WP:BIASED)

Comment: There is active warfare in Donbass, as a matter of fact. This is a well sourced . The criteria for inclusion are obvious. Many sources are secondary and qualify as RS. Some others (such as https://donetsk24.su/news/operativnaia-svodka-za-sutki-s-25-na-26-iiulia/ that one) are indeed primary and hardly reliable. They should be probably removed. I agree: these events should be summarized more briefly, but this is a matter of fixing content. Not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)