Deletion of Nottingham Forest, Houston (2nd nomination)

Comment: I note that a commenter in the previous AfD pointed out that Nottingham Forest has a http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:1285602078328427::NO::P3_FID:2472170 GNIS entry as a populated place. Given that, and the otability (geography)|Notability (geography) essay which doesn't give a clear keep or delete recommendation for such places, I'm leaning keep (weakly) for now. I'm a little concerned by the lack of non-Bill Hicks secondary sources, though. The Chronicle link in the article is broken, and doing a search on the Chron website only gives real estate results, which isn't encouraging
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It is well established that places are notable.  The rest just seems to be  contrary to our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: Information that is verifiable and notable can be mentioned there. Similar to , I do not believe that Hicks being from a neighborhood makes the neighborhood notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)