Deletion of Trump orb

Comment: Easily meets  and has coverage above the routine levels that would be disqualified by . Merging would be my second, less prefered option to deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Riyadh Summit 2017. This is #2 material that generated only coverage in reliable sources for a very limited period of time. Its notability has not been lasting. –&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: It is impossible to establish the notability of a media event involving the president in less than a week, or for that matter, less than a month. A textbook case of ; come back when it is clear that anyone cared in the long run
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per the same reasoning I used at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covfefe incident|Covfefe AfD, per " and , maybe this should just be put on :n:|Wikinews instead? (I know  talks about the content of an article, but I think it can also be applied to article subjects)". A similar sort of picture is the Ed Miliband bacon sandwich one, but that is still being talked about - http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/ed-miliband-bacon-sandwich-leg-10181661 here, for example. But I seriously don't think this orb will be being talked about in three years time. (I know it's a OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, but still, I think it's a useful comparison
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YEARS)

Comment: if Trump sneezed during a speech, there would be at least three major newspaper sources covering it. There's (rightly) no coverage of press memes from earlier, such as Trump referring to Chuck Todd as "Sleepy Eyes". Both  and  are reasons to delete this article independent from "notability" concerns
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS does not apply, because this is not "routine" coverage, it is widespread coverage in many , and it is continuing. See http://www.snopes.com/simpsons-predict-trump-orb/ as recently as 7 June. Other than notnews I see no policy-based reason to delete this. It clearly passes the  a dozen times over, and thus is notable by the only objective standard that Wikipedia uses. I could wish that events like this were not notable, but the fact is that currently, they are. Therefore, Wikipedia should include articles about them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: it is |the gift that keeps on giving
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: A perfect example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Not even news, and unlikely to ever meet .  If it does somehow meet , then I think it should be merged into some omnibus "Trump in Social Media" article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: to Riyadh_Summit_2017#Arab_Islamic_American_Summit, where it should receive only  coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:DUE)

Comment: Per the aforementioned rationales, I am tired of seeing garbage tier memes and  flooding this website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)