Deletion of John Earle Sullivan

Comment: and I feel the need to reiterate my suspicion people don't read , because he passes as well as anyone. I suspect failure of the ten-year test would require nuclear holocaust between now and 2031 such as to make every other issue pale in comparison; recentism ''is'' an issue (not to be confused with "this will be a footnote in a decade"!), mostly by way of many-not-all of his events being in fact recent, and I expect the matter to settle naturally as we get increasingly far from blast radius
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: There's : see the ''Intercept'', ''Rolling Stone'', Gehrke's article. I think there was perhaps a weak argument for an article before, but the most recent event makes it a very strong case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: He has notability in Chinese news as well. And as someone stated above, he was also covered prior to January 6. So I think there is sufficient notability. Furthermore,  suggests avoiding having an article "{{tq|If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented.}}" And the Capitol incident is significant and he agitated violence in the Capitol
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as  does not apply in this case with point 2 and possibly point 3. There are alot of sources that covered Sullivan's involvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: He doesn't seem to be notable for pre-1/6 activities or meet  for them.  His notability seems to derive from the storming of the capitol but  applies to that, and he does not seem to have played enough of a role to warrant his own article. Any content should be able to be dealt with in the main article and forks including the "aftermath" article (Aftermath_of_the_2021_storming_of_the_United_States_Capitol#January_14|there is already a paragraph about him there). His article also suffers recentism problems and is unlikely to pass the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:TENYEARTEST)

Comment: this "activist" is not notable for attending any of the events listed in the current article, not even the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol|insurrection he himself attended.  and  are also reasons to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:BLP1E)