Deletion of Airashii hana

Comment: Lots of mangas started of with strong amateur work by unknown artists, so it's possible that this'll take off someday. And if it does, and enough |reliable sources notice that it does, then an article might be appropriate. Right now, though, not so much. It's clear what the subject is (moreso after a quick wikiformatting spree), but do Manga fall under CSD A7? The article doesn't appear to assert notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Even if the verifiability issue is solved that is still a "home-brew" manga which fail the applicable guideline 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: per .  Appears to be about someone's unpublished manga.  Also fundamentally unencyclopedic, and may lack sufficient clarity and context to identify the subject of the article and allow other editors to meaningfully expand
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: as per . Ought to be snowballed to put it out of its misery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)