Deletion of List of Sacramento entertainers

Comment: The nomination doesn't advance arguments regarding topic notability itself, and instead, is based upon the current state of the article. An article being unsourced is not a valid criterion for deletion, per the criterion for deletion listed here: #REASON. It's likely that this article could easily be sourced with some basic research, as entertainers often receive a fair amount of press and news coverage. I'm making no implication here regarding any type of faith regarding the nominator; the nomination's rationale isn't policy based. Also, this is a useful, discriminate list with a well-defined focus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: no reason to delete is provided.  See , , , &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:IMPERFECT)