Deletion of 33550336

Comment: The problem with that reasoning is the assumption that the perfect numbers are "trivial" because, notwithstanding that mathematicians spent millennia searching for them, they don't pass some 21st century math student's "three-properties" test.  Like , though,  doesn't exclude anything; it's a means of bringing in subjects that might not otherwise meet .  As others have pointed out, there's a history behind both of these, evident from many reliable and verifiable sources, that makes them notable without having to pass some 3-tasks initiation ceremony to get into the mathematical frat house
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:NUMBER||WP:N)

Comment: I do find the information somewhat interesting. I'm not experienced enough with  the  policy to really make a firm decision
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: both Since numbers have a life of their own I'd apply #People notable for only one event rule of notability. It only has a minor role in Perfect numbers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: nbsp; Both meet , a concern here regards hat Wikipedia is not for the current 8589869056 (number) article.&nbsp; The fifth perfect number was discovered in 1456, the sixth in separate discoveries one in 1555 and one in 1588, and the seventh discovered in 1588, i.e., our sources tell us that these numbers are notable.&nbsp; The detail split-off offers a different viewpoint than it has at the Perfect number article, so I don't agree with the redirect to Perfect number.&nbsp; The issue is in telling where the examples, as they become larger, become hat Wikipedia is not, and that doesn't occur with 33550336 (number).&nbsp; Given the Cataldi history, I'd say the sixth and seventh perfect numbers belong in a combined article, with redirects to that article being 8589869056 (number) and 137438691328 (number).&nbsp; I'm not aware of a purpose for keeping 8589869056 (number) as a redirect to Perfect number.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:W||WP:W)