Deletion of De Suarez d'Aulan

Comment: both articles (same text). One book by François d'Aulan as a source, and two listings. This lineage article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This heap of sentences and words thrown together does not pass , and as the OP stated, it would take a lot to elevate it to WP standards. But more dammening, the info is simply inaccurate as it stands. The history of the family name, as claimed here, is not actual, cohesive, and thus, it is amateurship. The weak sources, or lack of reliable ones, explain it (). I understand and also appreciate https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/De_Suarez_d%27Aulan&type=revision&diff=862400497&oldid=862359967&diffmode=source the argument for inclusion. However, with this type of subjective topic, which requires a careful hand for stitching facts and dates together, we should not simply accept any type of attempt at writing an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for creation (WP:AFC||WP:RS)