Deletion of Blinovitch Limitation Effect

Comment: The subject is discussed, with significant coverage, in reliable secondary sources (the cited books by Parkin, Letts and Miles).  The fact that the secondary sources are all related to ''Doctor Who'' is irrelevant; discussion of any fictional subject is most likely to be found in material focused on that subject.  The key is that these sources — all non-fiction, or at least containing significant non-fiction elements — discuss the idea in a real-world context beyond its role in the plots of specific ''Doctor Who'' stories.   lists three criteria for keeping articles with fictional subjects: real-world coverage, importance of the fictional work, and role within the fictional work.  I think this meets all these criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: I was tempted to close this per  3 but the sockmaster is not technically "banned" and I consider arguments to transwiki as "delete" !votes. This is a damn good article and it should be kept somewhere if not here. Sending it to http://tardis.wikia.com tardis.wikia.com sounds like a plan
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)