Deletion of Prof. (Dr.) Usha Tandon

Comment: I have edited the article, removing the most egregious promotional language and a lot of trivial fluff. What's left is badly-sourced, but even when taking everything on face value, I don't see any evidence of notability. I searched GScholar and Google (time consuming, as there are several people of the same name). I did not see any evidence on GS of Tandon being cited in any significant way. although there are a number of Ghits, most are again about other people and the few sources that I saw (e.g., http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/du-law-faculty-finds-itself-in-a-tighter-spot/ this one, on the faculty being derecognised by the Bar Council of India) are just in-passing mentions. The reports are in part published on blog websites. The book on population law is published with a publisher that is so insignificant, they don't even have a real website (instead, there's just a page on blogspot...) Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: GS cites are too weak to support rof. oo soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)

Comment: The article includes what looks like a claim of notability under #C8 (editor-in-chief of two journals) that appears stronger than the #C1 claims based on citations to the subject's papers. But the two journals in question, ''Journal of the Campus Law Centre'' and ''National Journal of Comparative Law'', both fail the "major, well-established" requirements of that notability criterion. In particular, the only information I can find online about the JCLC ends up directing me to a dead web address that is part of a collection of "Home Pages of University of Delhi Community Members" rather than any respectable publisher, and the NJCL is only little better, with only 15 hits on Google, one of them being this article itself and most of them looking very spammy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)