Deletion of Surautomatism

Comment: reply to|Spinningspark|Matthiaspaul}} Thanks for the info. However, I do not think that keep is the solution here per . Thoughts? Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDICTIONARY)

Comment: The sources SpinningSpark provided are fairly cut-and-dry. The argument that it needs to be fixed immediately to avoid deletion seems like textbook  to me. I also found https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context=dadasur this journal article which discusses surautomatism on pp. 4–7
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IMPATIENT)