Deletion of List of Jewish inventors (third nomination)

Comment: Per established precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in , , , AT, and , this list is specifically per applicable policies and guidelines and serves the project and its readers.  As these inventors already have sourced Wikipedia articles (well, all but one), including them in a list with defined parameters is '''not''' a violation of , finding reasons to |not like the list notwithstanding
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:LSC||WP:LISTNAME||WP:SALAT||WP:LISTPEOPLE||WP:NOTDIR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Same old policy/guideline violations (, , & tand-alone_lists) This one however, is especially problematic (this goes to all other "List of X inventors") because it is  difficult to define the difference between an invention and an improvement. Also, as is common in history, several things may have been invented almost simultaneously (ex. radio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:EGRS||WP:S)

Comment: per , criteria #6, which states that: ''"Wikipedia articles are not non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "People from ethnic/cultural/religious group X employed by organization Y" or "Restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories like these are not considered sufficient basis to create an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon."'' This article is an almost exact fit for "People from ethnic/cultural/religious group X employed by organization Y", where religious group X = Jews and organization Y = inventors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: The result of the earlier debate was "no consensus", with the delete votes being based on the existence of no similar articles.  We now have List of African-American inventors, for whatever that's worth, and List of inventors killed by their own inventions.  More importantly, race/religion and profession is a non-trivial intersection, many inventors are notable FOR being Jewish inventors and vice versa, there's a tolerably clear (if overly wide) definition of inventor at invention, and in as much as there's debate about what entries belong on the list that's a matter for discussion on the talk page, not AfD.  See  for further discussion of the criteria for acceptable stand-alone lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)