Deletion of Wolf Bickel (2nd nomination)

Comment: When we evaluate notability for academics,  says that academics whose work shows a significant impact on their field are considered notable. I would make an analogy to this case, and say that his position as among the most prolific discovers of small planets ''perhaps'' renders him notable. I'm not entirely convinced, though. Oh, and that table needs to be taken out of the article, it is quite ridiculous having a table with ~600 redlinks in a Bio
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)