Deletion of Atol (aircraft)

Comment: Nothing is inherently notable. However, otability (aircraft) suggests that verifiably distinct "types" of aircraft are generally notable, with emphasis on the "verifiably". This isn't my area, so I'm not going to !vote, but if Atol 495 has been recognised as a distinct "type" of aircraft, that's what you need to establish through reliable sources. Claiming notability without providing any evidence won't help your argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: While sources are sketchy, the Jane's reference (which shows more on the gBooks search page, sufficent to establish that the aircraft is, in fact, included) is sufficient to |verify, via a |reliable source, that this is a distinct and unique type of aircraft. Sources need not be in the article, only available, and this is so. The article desperatly needs a mop taken to it, but |AfD is not for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOTCLEANUP)