Deletion of Stanislava Pak Stanković

Comment: as has been shown above the subject has received multiple mention in non-primary sources (whose reliability is questionable). However, none of those multiple mentions appear to be |in-depth |significant coverage of the subject, therefore the subject does not appear to pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INDEPTH||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I see no indications of notability here, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: While I share WhiteWriter's concern about it being a new article ripe for expansion, the fact is WhiteWriter has been around long enough to know notability does not work so simply as someone's appointment (thus this nomination can't be called |BITEy for coming too soon). The mere fact that someone is a political appointee does not result in a finding of notability, especially with respect to recent political appointees (in this case, someone who has held the office for two months at most). The article as written reeks of being a CV, the storage of which is |not within Wikipedia's goals. My search for sources on this individual has been hampered by the facts that (1) I cannot read Serbian, and (2) the sources I ''can'' read are not |significant coverage of her |in her own right. With that in mind, I would change my !vote to a keep if WhiteWriter or another editor can present a ''prima facie'' case that this individual meets . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:NOTCV||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: non-notable political staffer, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)