Deletion of Ruthanna Emrys

Comment: ec}} - the nominator made substantial deletions to the article before nomination, but based on the article before that happened https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruthanna_Emrys&diff=971990961&oldid=964072662 1, additional reviews that could be added, e.g. https://www.kirkusreviews.com/news-and-features/articles/winter-tide-ruthanna-emrys/ Kirkus Reviews (Winter Tide, 2017), https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-7653-9090-5 Publishers Weekly (Winter Tide, 2016), https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-59021-702-3 Publishers Weekly (Imperfect Commentaries, 2019), sources that could help expand the article: https://www.npr.org/2017/05/04/526591070/remastering-the-mythos-questions-for-ruthanna-emrys NPR (Litany of the Earth/Winter Tide, interview with secondary commentary, 2017), https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/15/16315248/ruthanna-emrys-subverting-lovecraft-tropes-cosmic-horror-winter-tide-deep-roots-interview The Verge (Litany of the Earth/Winter Tide/Deep Roots, interview with secondary commentary, 2017), and sources noted in the nom: https://gizmodo.com/the-u-s-government-inflicted-horrible-atrocities-on-ct-1586754141 Gizmodo (Litany of the Earth, 2014), https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/9/20856492/carnival-row-amazon-hp-lovecraft-racism-cthulhu The Verge (more than a paragraph discussing and comparing her work, including a reference to The Litany of Earth as "remarkable", 2019), and awards, e.g. finalist for Locus Award for Best First Novel https://locusmag.com/2018/04/2018-locus-awards-finalists/ 2, Crawford Award shortlist https://www.fantastic-arts.org/2018/2018-iafa-crawford-award-and-shortlist-announced/ 3, there appears to be sufficient sourcing to support  and  notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per Montanabw, and per  and  notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: it’s really poor form to remove half the existing citations, chop down the article and THEN nominate it for deletion.  I restored the previous version so that reviewers can take a closer look at the material available. It’s not a great article as written, but quality doesn’t correlate to verifiability or notability.  may be possible
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)