Deletion of Elizabeth A. Wood

Comment: The article as nominated already included multiple nontrivial reliable sources, demonstrating a pass of . The nominator needs to learn the difference between newspaper obituaries that are paid for by the family of the deceased (not relevant for notability) and published obituaries in newspapers or academic journals that are solicited by the publication (as good as any other source for GNG). The nominator's claim that the other sources are trivial is also not true — at least, for me, a trivial mention would be a sentence mentioning the subject in a paragraph about someone or something else, or a source that quotes the subject but is not about the subject. Here, the "Women of Science" paper has a full paragraph entirely about the subject and her accomplishments, and "American Women of Science Since 1900" has a full-length entry, approximately 1.5 pages. In addition, her role as the first female president of the American Crystallographic Association and her honors as fellows of AAAS and APS as well as of two more specialized societies give her multiple clear passes of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: Going by , the subject appears to meet, at a minimum,  #3 (fellow of the American Physical Society) and #6 (president of the American Crystallographic Association), and likely #1 (developing the first notation for surface crystallography; see https://books.google.com/books?id=js7kXqvG1MIC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false Unertl, ''Physical Structure'', p. 26
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: Clear case of the nominator failing to do  and nominating an article as it was being created. Clearly meets GNG and ACADEMIC. Bias in news coverage of women before the present era often results in obituaries being one of the most significant sources for details of their lives. If the provider is a RS, and other documentation corroborates, why would one assume it is trivial? Triviality is not a mark of length, it is a mark of depth. A single sentence saying someone invented, was president, had an award named after them, etc. carries depth and weight regardless of its length. {{u|Fuzheado}} very cool photos. Wonder if they could be used as fair use with the rationale of limited use to improve recognition of a deceased person
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)