Deletion of Cruise (film)

Comment: Per Wikipedia:Notability (films) , If all that existed was the press release this would not be a notable subject. However, in this case numerous independent  have deemed the subject of the press release to be notable enough to publish related content. At WP, as a tertiary resource, our responsibility is to summarize such RS regardless of their similarity. Examining Wikipedia:Notability (films) (especially the subsection ), if the press release is the source for our article it should not be kept. However, looking at the second part of that section, the proper consideration is whether sources with reliable publication processes and authoritarian authors have deemed the subject matter to be notable. In this case as {{u|Voceditenore}} has noted, numerous independent sources that have reliable publication processes and authoritarian authors have published content on the film, albeit similar content echoing a press release. Nothing about NFSOURCES says anything about a requirement that the RS have to have a wide variety of opinions. If several independent RS all have the exact same opinions it is no more or less satisfactory than if there is disparity. Clearly, the editors of each publication has independently determined the subject to be notable enough for its audience's attention. The other element of Wikipedia:Notability (films) that is relevant is consideration of its progress per . Clearly principal photography has commenced, making  irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NFSOURCES||WP:NFF||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Not only per  but also per Wikipedia:Notability (films) which it comprehensively fails. It's still being filmed—not even in post-production http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5034122/ according to IMDB. It also fails . Although masquerading as multiple "articles", six of the eight references are virtually identical announcements in industry trade papers and websites that the film was being planned. They all appeared on September 14/15, 2015 and are all based on http://www.ramascreen.com/emrata-and-spencerboldman-will-star-in-robert-siegels-cruise/ this press release of September 14, 2015 from AG Capital (the film's financers), which, unsurprisingly, is repeated in whole or in part in all the "articles". Of the remaining two, one is yet another trade website "announcing" another bit of the casting in October 2015. The other one, also from October 2015, is in a British tabloid with 12 large publicity photos of the female lead http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3273586/Emily-Ratajkowski-shows-TINY-mid-section-wearing-bandeau-filming-scenes-set-Cruise-New-York.html "showcasing her taut tummy in a tiny crop top." and minimal text, mostly about her other activities with four sentences about the film (taken from the original press release). I've searched for anything better, but there just isn't. Cruise (film) is simply a product announcement for product that hasn't even been made yet. It does not belong in an encyclopedia, even one like Wikipedia. How on earth this article made it to the main page as a Wikipedia:Did you know|Did you know? three days ago is beyond me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:GNG)

Comment: As an example of . It's being filmed, however that doesn't say much. Agreed it reads promotionally as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)