Deletion of Darren M Jackson

Comment: I'm honestly on the fence as I was one of the editors that tagged it for speedy before, but I can see the possibility for notability under . The only conditional I would have is that the creator establish some notability and establish it fast or I would recommend it be nominated again
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: It is notable under  due to Jackson competeing in a 'fully professional' league. These are the guide lines set out for basic criteria by wikipedia. mixed Martial Arts is not illegal it is sactioned by International Sport Combat Federation  competed in a fully professional league Jackson is a pro fighter see pro record by sherdog, also if it fulls under amateur sports, must have competed in prestigious events, I think Dave Couryneys Fight night in tribute to Joey pyll at caesars palace is very prestigigous
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: I do not think there is quite enough there to establish  notability, and as the sport is illegal I can not see this falling under . That is the way I see it policywise. If this one survives, I do not think I will be disappointed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: I've tidied it up a bit, so the article should be cleaner, but it is still needs a lot of work. My problem is that I'm unable to confirm the references - I don't know if they are sufficiently notable or not, because I can't get access to any of the better ones within the time constraints, and the weaker references are insufficient to establish notability. I'm also unable to source any references of my own, but that could be due to the nature of bare-knuckle fighting - it isn't a world which I have much insight into. From what I can tell, if the Fighters Magazine articles do cover him, then, in conjunction with the other material, he's probably notable enough to warrant keeping. This, of course, is assuming good faith on the part of the editor, which I see no reason to doubt, in spite of some problems (he's certainly enthusiastic). I should add that the weaker references, while by no means proving notability, do support the claim that he is a genuine fighter, and that he has fought at some sort of professional level - whether he fought at a level high enough to meet  is for those who know the field better than I to determine. Anyway, I agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: also meets  criteria under amateur who competes at a prestigious event, see reference to Mark Epsteins world title fight and win, Jackson was on the Bill, I would say that a world title event is pretty prestigious. There in no case to delete or speedy delete, if deleted this would be to go against guide lines set out in the basic wikipedia criteria for notability  end off . Special:Contributions/90.208.51.74|90.208.51.74
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Meets criteria of notabilty under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: possible #A7.  A web search is not a source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)