Deletion of Zeiss Loxia Distagon T* 2.8/21mm

Comment: although the article is a stub with only one reference, there are other potential independent references such as https://phillipreeve.net/blog/rolling-review-zeiss-loxia-distagon-2-821mm-t/ and https://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Zeiss-Loxia-2.8-21-review-Compact-yet-outstanding-optical-performance that can prove notability.  is achieved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a catalog of every product which is offered for sale.   Most lenses and cameras which have been offered for sale in the last hundred years or so have had some reviews in photo magazines. Coincidentally, those same magazines which reviewed camera products  sold pages of advertising to the companies whose products they reviewed. Today these pricey gadgets all get a bit of coverage at sites which get revenue from sellers when readers click on the link as well as sites which may or may not qualify as "reliable sources" since any person can create such a review site.  In particular, dpreview is owned by Amazon and lets readers purchase the lens at Amazon with a mere click. Therefore I discount the sites in general as being "independent and reliable coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)