Deletion of YTCracker (3rd nomination)

Comment: The subject of the article fails , has not ''|received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject''. The number of sockpuppets and s at this AFD page is disturbing. I hope the closing administrator will take this into account. The sockpuppets should also be blocked
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:SPA)

Comment: Once one slugs through the above sockpuppetry which make one want to favor deletion simply in reaction, it does appear from reading the article that he meets  which is what matters. I agree that there is a lot more sourcing for his hacking than for his music but that is an issue of how to write the detail of the article more than anything else
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: partly per nom. He seemed to be more notable as a hacker, but not every hacker is notable. Fails several guidelines, including 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Deleting this page makes as much sense as deleting Kevin Mitnick and MC Frontalot's pages in one swipe. Notability as a hacker is proven. Notability as a Nerdcore artist is proven. Notability as an entrepreneur, while hardly touched on in the actual page, is proven. Sufficient sources, meets  which is more then enough to keep this page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: WP:SOFIXIT Both past AfDs closed as snow keeps and there seems to be plenty to work with. There is a list of references linked at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/YTCracker, I suggest the nom make use of them. Per  AfD is not for editorial issues that can be corrected through the normal editing process.  and  are not valid reasons to nominate an article for deletion. The ''Ties to the computer underworld'' section already has two references that are perfectly acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: Ignore the socks and meatpuppets. The levels of vote-stacking in this case are unfortunate but they should not distract us from trying to find consensus based on arguments. Although it happened, experienced users should know not to !vote based on these happenings. Back to the topic at hand: FisherQueen (amongst others) has proven that notability exists in this case, multiple reliable sources establish notability, at the very least per the |general notability guideline. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Mr. Cracker shared http://www.glitched.nl/images/glitched/glitched-in-varagids.pdf this article, which is in Dutch but appears to confirm the existence of an international tour.  Since touring internationally is one of the marks of notability at , that works for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)