Deletion of Steuart Campbell

Comment: I was prepared to close this as delete on the basis that the only keep is "very weak", and  is almost always a very strong reason for deletion (I set great store by the rule of thumb that if someone's |notable, they won't need to create their own article), making deletion uncontroversial. However, the article has one backlink - to Rendlesham Forest Incident - albeit added by an anonymous IP, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rendlesham_Forest_Incident&diff=62561870&oldid=58674796, so the edit may or may not have also come from Mr Campbell. (*edit* Correction: the mention of the name was added by an IP
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO||WP:N)

Comment: WP:AUTO is not a deletion criterion, and Mr. Campbell might barely meet : 91k Google hitshttp://www.google.com/search?q=Steuart+Campbell, some of which seem to consider him a kind of expert when it comes to paranormal phenomena, and one of his books has been cited a couple timesoncehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cluster=11835543818716423374 in a journal. I have no experience in this area, so I can't vouch for the quality of this journal
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Definately , however, he has had 4 books published, listed at Barnes & Noble and Amazon, so a complete re-write might be preferable to a delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO)