Deletion of Innovation Works

Comment: Sources satisfy . Special:Contributions/108.21.12.231|108.21.12.231
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Lacks  entirely. Its existence is verified mostly in unreliable sources; its notability is not
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Meets the |General Notability Guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems to fail , which is slightly more strict than  because trading corporations are prone to promote, making the required independence of sources suspect.  http://old.post-gazette.com/pg/06109/683141-96.stm is a good start, but not enough. The article is missing relevance to other mainspace articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:N)

Comment: I'm seeing some coverage but I'm not really convinced it goes beyond local coverage of a local initiative/enterprise. There are lots of seed funding initiatives and business "start-up" support programs - almost every State Government has something similar (even here in my native Australia). I'm not really convinced by the argument that it gains notability from the businesses it has supported. So we need to rely on coverage to substantiate a pass against . I don't think we're there yet. As far as I'm concerned, we would probably need to see some national coverage or inter-state coverage to substantiate that this is a program notable beyond the borders of a particular region, as distinct from the myriad programs like it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)