Deletion of Jane Musoke-Nteyafas (3rd nomination)

Comment: I have added information about a book of short stories published by Musoke-Nteyafas, and information from a review of the book, to the article. I also added information from a reference about Musoke-Nteyafas' participation in an art-related fundraiser, and a reference to her poetry in the ''Chicken Bones Journal''.  These additions appear to offer more support for  notability, which reflects Musoke-Nteyafas' multi-faceted career as a writer and artist. As to the notability of the Miss AfriCanada award, it seems notable because it was subject to in-depth, independent, reliable reporting that offered commentary about the event and Musoke-Nteyafas, per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: The edit and deletion histories seem a bit overrated in the deletion intro. We don't do spite keep or delete but look at articles and subjects "as is". And "as is" it currently passes the . Even without . So the choice is easy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Additional research and updates to the article seem to support , including because "multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability." Musoke-Nteyafas appears to have a multi-faceted, multi-national career, and there appear to be additional references available, including based on information included in the recently-added 2007 ''UGPulse'' profile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Breaking it down, the notability has to come from somewhere, but it's hard to identify exactly where. She is a beauty pageant winner, but where the contest is non notable, that in itself isn't a whole lot to go on. She's had short pieces published in an anthology and a journal, but as an author or creative that wouldn't fulfil uthor. I don't think asic is fulfilled either. The only significant coverage I can find are two online profile articles which are a bit dubious in terms of reliability, and a third article referring to a 2000 beauty pageant. Significantly human interest reporting is often not considered as reliable, and at least one source isn't independent since it appears that she writes for the source/the article is a profile of a writer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:B)

Comment: not finding enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show that she meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)