Deletion of List of churches in Oxford

Comment: Since there are no citations on the page and there is no content of notable reference, this list clearly violates 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: In addition to clearly violating #DIRhis, this is istcruft|listcruft and there are plenty of current precedents, including Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of churches in Fort Wayne, Indiana (2nd nomination)|List of churches in Fort Wayne, Indiana (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shopping malls in Malaysia|List of shopping malls in Malaysia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:L)

Comment: in accordance with  and :Wikipedia:Lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (:WP:CLS)

Comment: there's no reason for deleting this that wouldn't apply equally to all lists in Wikipedia.  Furthermore it seems clear to me from their other nominations and the trolling within them that the nominator is ing (although goodness knows what point they're trying to make
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Even given that only |notable churches should have articles, and that non-notable churches should not be redlinked, this is nevertheless an obviously useful indexing page.  Oxford, like Venice, is probably also full of churches that merit articles in their own right
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)