Deletion of Todd Beamer (2nd nomination)

Comment: You say "After the attacks", and that is, surely, the point.  He became famous posthumously because of one notable event.  Isn't that what  is all about?  It says "''If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography may be unwarranted.''".  I see nothing wrong with altering the policy of that is what consensus desires, but that is a different discussion.  Again, if consensus keeps the article, that is an important outcome. But, in that case, let us make our policies and guidelines crystal clear with no scope for a nomination such as this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Is this ready for a  closing yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Beamer is clearly one of those heroes who will be remembered, along with various aspects of his life, for a good long time, and the sheer volume of coverage amply demonstrates enduring historical notability.  is meant to screen out people who won't be remembered as being of note due to marginal involvement in news events, as opposed to figures of immense symbolic importance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: fails  and per #MEMORIAL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOT)