Deletion of Joe Siegler 2

Comment: I'd like to consider myself an inclusionist, but this goes against  and . Maybe if the article is rewritten and referenced to show his role as a software entrepeneur, then it might be notable, but a forum mod is not notable ''per se'', especially not a living one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:LIVING)

Comment: no indication of meeting  or anything of significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: fails  for lacking multiple non-trivial articles by third parties; notability is questioned since I get only 147 distinct Ghits for "joe siegler", consisting mainly of forum postings and a few press releases that quote him.  I get only 55 distinct Ghits for "joseph michael siegler", mostly from IMDB.  "software entrepreneur" is not automatic notability.  Perhaps he could be turned into a high school
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: subject does not meet the  guidelines for an article on a living person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per , lack of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per nomination. Being the owner and webmaster of the official Dopefish fansite means very little in terms of notability . The Apogee stuff on the page indicates that Apogee thinks he's an honest and reliable enough person to be trusted with the gold master, again, nothing particularly notable here. Webmasters are a dime a dozen. I would not be happy to accept the "software entrepreneur" claim on faith per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:V)

Comment: doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)