Deletion of Herman Rockefeller

Comment: Notability is not inherited.  Somebody isn't notable, just because he/she is/was friends with someone notable.  Read  for more information.  One must be notable in one's own right in accordance with |Wikipedia's notability policy.  If this isn't argued in a ''keep'' position, the weight we should put on that position ought to be significantly reduced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: None of the above ''keeps'' provide reasons in accordance with WP policy, as per  or .  With regard to the notability of victims, the policy states ''"A victim of a high-profile crime does not automatically qualify as being notable enough to have a stand-alone article solely based on his or her status as a victim. Notability with regards to this is normally defined as satisfying some other aspect of the notability of persons guideline..."'' So, we have to look at the notability of the crime itself or of Mr Rockefeller's life before  the crime.  If it's the crime that's notable, that should perhaps be the subject of the article, not the victim.  Before the crime, Mr Rockefeller was a very ordinary and, according to his family's own press statement, a very private person.  15 news articles in 20 years - most just quoting him as a company spokesperson certainly doesn't make him notable.  With regard to the crime as an example of psychoeconomics, if that is indeed the case, I would recommend a merge with Psychoeconomics.  I feel that this deletion must be argued in accordance with policy, otherwise we have a case of Wikipedia becoming a newspaper, in breach of . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:VICTIM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I don't think this falls under the victim guidelines as the page is about the events, not so much the person. I vote the page be changed to Murder of Herman Rockefeller as previously suggested and as per   —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/59.167.191.54|59.167.191.54
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: In general with |victims, the question is whether or not they would be sufficiently notable, without the one event, to have an article. In this case I have to go with no, in spite of the great work being done to it - the only mentions of him prior to his death were trivial, and the award isn't sufficiently notable to have made a difference. Perhaps if his death becomes more significant then things will change, but at the moment there doesn't seem to be enough, I'm afraid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM)

Comment: as per . if he's still getting coverage in 12 months time then recreate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Rockefeller was notable in the finance and property development sectors long before his death. He has had a media presence since 1998 at least (see http://www.expressindia.com/news/fe/daily/19980725/20655504.html). His significant business achievements, his bizarre double life as respected family man and sex swinger, and his disappearance and violent death place him well beyond 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SINGLEEVENT)