Deletion of Michele Megale

Comment: Firstly,  is ''not'' just an indiscriminate "keep anybody who has n>2 media hits regardless of any other considerations" — GNG most certainly ''does'' test sources for their depth, their geographic range and the ''context'' of what they're covering the person ''for'', and not just for whether the raw number of hits has exceeded two. We certainly don't have a rule that "local" coverage is ''inadmissible'' for use as Wikipedia sourcing, but we ''do'' have a rule that a small smattering of "local" coverage is ''not'' necessarily always ''enough'' in and of itself. For example, ''every'' mayor of ''everywhere'' can ''always'' show two or three hits in their ''local'' media — but our rule is that mayors are ''not'' all inherently notable just for existing as mayors, so the distinction between a notable mayor and a non-notable mayor does not turn on just showing a smattering of local media hits, it turns on being able to show a ''lot'' of coverage demonstrating a reason to treat him as significantly ''more'' important and notable than most other mayors. But that's just not being shown here at all.And secondly, the fact that the Italian article has existed for a decade isn't determinative: for almost its entire lifespan, it was based ''entirely'' on |primary sources that aren't support for notability, with ''no'' reliable or notability-building sources added ''at all'' until the blip of death coverage hit in June. So it shouldn't have existed since 2010, because it never had a properly sourced reason to exist either. Also see  for further clarification of why "this is a straight translation of an article that already exists on another language Wikipedia" is not a compelling keep argument in and of itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:WAX)