Deletion of Crips and Bloods: Made in America

Comment: Meets  and . The rather incisive articles in http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/movies/23crip.html ''The New York Times'' http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/cripsandbloods/makingof.html PBS(1), http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/cripsandbloods/film.html PBS (2), http://www.itvs.org/films/crips-and-bloods ITVS, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/05/review-crips-and-bloods-made-in-america.html ''Los Angeles Times'', and a http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Crips+and+Bloods:+Made+in+America%22&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&tbm=nws&prmd=ivns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=31LdToP3DIfdiALehPSDBA&ved=0CBMQpwUoBQ number of other sources tells me we have notability. I do agree that the article's |current state is poor, and that issues have |not been addressed... but notability is found in |a topic having coverage, and not in the article itself. With respects to the nominator, and sad that it has not yet been done, I don't think it best to delete when issues can be easily addressed through regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:UGLY||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:NRVE)