Deletion of Economic history of the Christians

Comment: No need to keep such a y article, subject is not so notable as to merit a placeholder, unless someone wants one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: The article is little more than a coatrack and an example of |original research by synthesis, obviously created as a counterpart to/retaliation for the equally bad Economic history of the Jews
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Just because the article was created as a  doesn't mean it should be deleted as a ; reliable sources seem to exist backing the notability of this topic. No prejudice against stubifying or merging
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:POINT)

Comment: The nominator is violating  and  by attacking the creation of this article (by me). It is highly offensive to call it a "joke" when it conforms to all WP standards of ;  and . See Economic history of the Jews as an example of this genre of articles. This article was nominated for deletion withing 24 hours of its creation without any serious effort at discussing it. Tens of thousands of WP articles have been created this way. The article is a serious  with many . The nominator is requested to note  and to withdraw this hasty nomination. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:NPA||WP:CITE||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:STUB||WP:RS||WP:DONOTDEMOLISH)

Comment: or '''stub to lead'''. Currently, the body of the article uses ''zero sources about the '''general''' topic''. It chooses to select two sub-topics, which are thinly sourced, and presents as them as the mainstream view of the whole field. The two sections don't even discuss slavery from an economics viewpoint. This is a fail-grade  essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Per Necrotheap and as a violation of |policy against content forks. Article apparently quickly cobbled together as a |pointy counterpart to now deleted "Economic history of the Jews" via false analogy (more appropriate analogues would be "Economic History of the Gypsies/Kurds/Berbers/Swahili" etc.). No evidence economic historians have written books under this title. Bad, undue weight-violating page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:POINT)

Comment: The article is a |pointy |coatrack that was created by copying much of another deleted article, using |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY||WP:COATRACK||WP:SYN)