Deletion of List of actors who have played animated characters

Comment: Irretrievably fails , probably runs afoul of , and abrades 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: I no longer see any point in answering every single objection, so I'll just reiterate my views here and try to get out of this discussion. A topic (in this case, ''actors who have played cartoon characters'') is presumed to be notable enough to merit an article if it meets the general notability guidelines. If we conclude that list topics do not fall under , it will be a direct invitation to fill Wikipedia with indiscriminately chosen cross-categorizations and other meaningless content. Of course, one can say that my argument is a form of , but if you keep List of actors who have played animated characters and delete, say, :List of actors who have played fat characters, wouldn't it some a sign of logical inconsistency and hypocrisy on your part
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ALLORNOTHING)

Comment: The list is not trivia nor an indiscriminate collection of information, as it serves as a navigation aid that serves to improve the project... one that meets the criteria of  as it is '''based''' on reliable sources. Should the nom wish the numerous references be brought over from the 12 listed articles, fine... but that is a matter for cleanup and not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STAND)

Comment: Way out of scope, contains no references or encyclopedic analysis of the subject, nor do I think it is possible with a topic this broad.  Many sub-lists might have the |proper scope for a list article but this topic is just way too broad to write an encyclopedic article about without using a synthesis of original research to tie it together. None of the sources given so far address the article as a whole, which is needed to ascertain notability of the especially broad subject matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: A very clear failure of  in that the list is |indiscriminate information and a DIRECTORY|repository of loosely associated topics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:IINFO||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)