Deletion of Barone Francesco Gauci

Comment: As I said on the other current AfD, the article fails  through the failure to identify the sources provided. The article fails  because no one has found sufficient coverage of the subect, either from the sources or on the internet. The lack of verifiability gives way to |original research concerns, but the most significant concerns here are  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Alright ... here we go.  First off, almost all the non-self-published sources Tancarville cites are unavailable for review to the vast majority of Wikipedia editors, which debars them from qualifying as |reliable sources.  For the non-English language texts,  holds the following: "Where editors use non-English sources, they should ensure that readers can verify for themselves the content of the original material and the reliability of its author/publisher ... Translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations made by Wikipedia editors
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: WP:V, , and  issues are insurmountable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:N)