Deletion of MyAnimeList (2nd nomination)

Comment: as failing to demonstrate notability through significant coverage in |reliable sources but without prejudice to a future recreation of the article(s) should circumstances change. My own quick trawl for references has not been successful but I would consider reviewing my !vote should Ned dig anything up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I think there are a satisfactory number of sources for the website, and I feel it is notable enough to be on wikipedia. I do agree that there are not enough sources adhering to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: No evidence of |notability and the single award the website has won isn't well-known for it to pass . Other then the source referencing the award, all of the other sources fail  and . I would also suggest that MAL Updater be added to the AFD since it is a software program for use on this website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:WEB||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: the sole applicable source for demonstrating notability hardly gives ''significant'' coverage. Rest of the sources fail , and in the absence of other sources to assert notability, deletion is warranted per . I tend to believe that if the article is notable, more of such sources providing notability would be available. Also, to the warring parties above, tone down the rhetoric. There's no reason you can't express your opinions in a |civil manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:CIVIL)

Comment: As of right now, the portion of the "Reception" section had all opinions of web bloggers, and their respective references as sources removed (by me). Obviously they do not pass . I also believe that although the article does have it's issues (despite the removal I just spoke of, some portions of the article still feel a bit like an ad), I believe it can be fixed. My own writing skills are probably not up to the task to be honest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This site has received http://www.seekjapan.jp/article/jz/1525/Best+of+the+Web+'08 coverage.  Simply because it is anime-related is not a good rationale for deletion, Iamblssed.  It smells of |IDONTLIKEIT.—Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I have updated and clarified the http://www.seekjapan.jp/article/jz/1525/Best+of+the+Web+'08 source in question. The article comes from Japanzine, a magazine 18 years in publication. Hopefully this should allow it to pass . As for the other criteria covered in , it qualifies for signifcant coverage since MAL received an entire paragraph discussing its features in detail, compared to other sites such as Anime News Network and Danny Choo, which had to share a paragraph. Japanzine is clearly a reliable source, and definitely independent of MAL. Are there any other criteria that need to be addressed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:N)

Comment: Per .  It is lacking sufficient evidence to prove notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)