Deletion of Anna-Lena Stolze

Comment: meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:NFOOTY says nothing about "fully professional". She meets requirements of  regardless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per .  still a heavily biased essay "managed" by a handful of self-appointed editors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FPL)

Comment: Article about semi-pro footballer who appears to be the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Lübecker Nachrichten (a regional newspaper for Schleswig-Holstein) has in-depth coverage (e.g., https://www.ln-online.de/Sportbuzzer/Sport-im-Norden/Anna-Lena-Stolze-will-in-Wolfsburg-angreifen). I think there is enough other coverage (none of which is as in-depth) such as https://ffussball-magazin.de/national/stolze-auf-leihbasis-zu-twente/ to conclude  is met. Perhaps we risk , but I think there is just enough to flesh this out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails  and . Again, a little coverage doesn't make the player pass GNG. If we want to argue that these leagues are where the women are automatically notable then the case needs to be made at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL)