Deletion of Pillars of the Church

Comment: as original research. Also violates  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V)

Comment: I concur about the Seems, if you're basing your article on that, you sure as hell better back it up with some good sources that say so, this article doesn't even bother to have any link outside of Wikipedia, so delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This does not look to me quite like the standard  article.  It looks to me as if the original author did have sources, but has failed to cite them.  If that is the case, the article is not , but merely one of many unreferenced articles.  I have just placed a warning of this AFD on his talk page, in the hope that he will rescue the article.  The article seems to be a commentary on Galatians 2:9 which refers events also described in Acts 15.  There is no contemporary commentary on the New Testament; all we have is Early Church Fathers, often several generations later.  The question is whether the article reflects ancient speculation or published modern speculation (neither of which is ) or mere recent speculation.  I would in any event prefer to see the article trimmed somewhat or setting out competing views on the subject matter
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OR)

Comment: as nn. Since nom'd no attempt to add |sources (I can't find any) so looks like 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOR)