Deletion of Creation Books

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  I have looked through the various Google searches and based on that, I don't believe the sources exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am not finding any reliable sources that give substantial coverage of the company, fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: As infamous as this company has become, there just aren't any reliable sources that would show how it's notable. The only sources I've found have been articles briefly mentioning the company as well as of course a few blogs and websites talking about the controversy over authors not getting their royalties, none of which could be used as a reliable source. There's just nothing out there and since Wikipedia isn't meant to be a |soapbox for viewpoints, there's no other choice but to vote to delete.tokyogirl79
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)