Deletion of State National

Comment: this article is a synthetic essay - that is, it takes information from a number of sources, and puts it together in a manner to advance a thesis that is not in any of those sources. Being an essay is not a bad thing in itself, but it does |not belong on Wikipedia. There are other venues for the publication of essays; Wikipedia is not such a venue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: as |biased article promoting a |fringe theory, and then redirect to Redemption movement#History where similar concepts are already discussed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: An interesting read at first. Then the impression grows that this is cobbled together. Finally, the impression is that it is a load of cobblers. Original research, essay, whatever. Words are, and have been for quite some time, my business, but I find it hard to understand exactly what this is about. I do understand that it very much smacks of the soapbox (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)