Deletion of Aki Tomosaki

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: The nominator's focus on fan-based awards is spillover from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hitomi Tanaka (3rd nomination), where the Aki Tomosaki was pointed out as . While the subject's notability is questionable at first look, this nomination looks y
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX||WP:POINT)

Comment: Fails  and the . No real assertion of notability. Claimed award is given by a broadcaster to promote its own programming, and therefore fail the well-known/significant test. Moreover, the "mature actress"/MILF category by consensus general fails that standard, regardless of the awardgiver. Negligible biographical content. Little reliable sourcing beyond databases; other source are promotional or retailer pages. Of the two potentially reliable sources, the Tokyo Journal provides only background information on the porn industry in Japan, not the article subject; while "Sake-Drenched Postcards" is a component of a conspicuously dubious self-published source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)