Deletion of Happy Computers

Comment: I  still have an Atari 800 too - happy days indeed.  The company was evidently notable and the nomination fails 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: Evidently notable based on the encyclopedic value of its contents. Also for a technology topic the sources are adequate. The nomination not only fails , but also the Administrator who made this AFD nomination may have retaliated against Colonel Warden. (At any rate the admin who made this AFD nomination did make a suspiciously-timed and completely false claim against Colonel Warden; see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Colonel_Warden&diff=247446028&oldid=245052796). So much for  with this AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:AGF)

Comment: The references (old print magazines, now reproduced on the web) seem okay to me. The only debatable issue is whether the company merits an article, because the reference are mostly about the products; but the article ''is'' mainly about the products. There are some -like claims towards the end of the article, but most of it is supported by sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: due to utter lack of any kind of |reliable sources to |verify notability to the standards required by , oh and it's  - which is all a long-winded way of saying "per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:VER||WP:ORG||WP:OR)