Deletion of Alex Eroadster

Comment: per nom: lack of  coverage past the 2015 flurry, the only exception is from a Longford Leader|low circulation local weekly paper (~7000 copies).   at best. If this were a real thing to be released next year, you'd expect more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I agree with Carrite that with the four references currently in the article it meets and passes  and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While my initial reaction was to suggest that this was/is a case of , there is perhaps an argument that GNG is at least partially met. (I would note however that much of the coverage which contributes to that GNG argument, including this http://www.bbc.com/autos/story/20150730-meet?ocid=global_autos_rss BBC Autos piece, all seems to build on the same flurry of PR activity in 2015; and as such would seem to fall short of ). If the article is kept (and I'm not strongly advocating either way), it needs significant review relative to the PR tone of the content. And flagging with :Template:Update after|{{Update after|year=2018}} - given that's the speculated release date of this planned/proposed/as-yet-unrealised product. (Or at least its first real-world prototype
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CORPDEPTH)