Deletion of Sarah Bakewell

Comment: Passes  and has been reviewed in major publications sufficient for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I found http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/18/books/18montaigne.html the New York Times review and a review http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/how-to-live-by-sarah-bakewell-1882249.html in the Independent, and she's won a National Book Critics Circle Award http://bookcritics.org/blog/archive/national_book_critics_circle_award_winners_sarah_bakewell_darin_strauss_isa.  These alone would be enough to convince me of her |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and clean up if necessary. I don't know what the agenda is here, but deleting 90% of a sourced article and nominating it for deletion is not helpful. One of the deleted sources was a book review in the New York Times. The remaining Guardian link contains a review by The Guardian of the same book. Bakewell is very likely to meet  on that basis. I will revert your unnecessary and time-wasting deletion and remove the innacurate 'unreferenced' tag
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)