Deletion of Languages of the Imperium

Comment: Lacks references to secondary, third-party sources reflecting the significant coverage required to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I disagree that it fails , but it certainly fails  as none of the sources it quotes are independent.  for the benefit of users unfamilar with Games Workshop: the extensive backstory developed for the games is done so by the company in order to sell ancillary products (such as novels, guidebooks, etc.).  As such, they control the copyright pretty tightly.  While it is tempting to argue that future research can '''always''' result in the discovery of independent sources, it isn't too likely with games workshop's intellectual property.  The content produced by games workshop is voluminous, yes, but it is so because of the intent in creation, not because the subject matter merits voluminous coverage (as would be the case if the makers of reference material were independent from the subject).  Therefore this should not be viewed as a case where the |general notability guideline is wrong, but a case where it is properly applied.  And since this article cites no independent secondary sources to assert notability, it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:GNG)