Deletion of WASP-22b

Comment: while it did receive significant coverage in two papers (see above), the author lists have a ''huge'' overlap so I do not think it qualifies as separate sources. That is quite a debatable view, and one could argue that two ''editors'' accepted it so it is after all independent publications. I prepared to !vote "weak delete" but checking  more closely I found ''For the purposes of this guideline, "independent" means independent of the scientist or scientists who discovered the object (...)'' - which makes it a clear-cut case, it seems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTCRIT)