Deletion of SMART HDD

Comment: Meets . The sources already in the article do not match the nominator's description; https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-smart-hdd this for example is not an "entry in a security company database." There are sources showing what it is, how to remove it, and they go into great detail about it, unambiguously meeting . Just because some of the sources are database entries does not mean that all of the sources are; something that should have been checked |before nominating the article for deletion. A cursory Google search shows plenty of articles that go into detail about what it is and how to remove ithttps://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-smart-hddhttps://malwaretips.com/blogs/smart-hdd-virus/https://www.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/6672-remove-smart-hddhttps://botcrawl.com/how-to-remove-smart-hdd-virus/https://www.precisesecurity.com/rogue/smart-hdd/https://www.axxys.com/virus-alert-data-recovery-s-m-a-r-t-repair/ as well as a few books such as https://books.google.com/books?id=CuM2DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT225&lpg=PT225&dq=%22SMART+HDD%22+malware&source=bl&ots=MzjNhfQbtM&sig=ACfU3U1Kat7JkQ04MZSYyFhPcOQfNVfJLA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiOlYDrr7zoAhVPbc0KHWjUDPg4KBDoATADegQIChAB#v=onepage&q=%22SMART%20HDD%22%20malware&f=false Introduction to Machine Learning with Applications in Information Security and research papers https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11416-015-0252-0?shared-article-renderer such as this one. It does not appear that any effort was taken to discuss on the article's talk page or search for sources before nominating the article for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The removal guides are  for malware, and from questionable sources at that. Outside of mentioning it as part of a group of tested malware, the book and paper only have the same short blurb about the software. This is unsurprising as they turn out to have a common author, meaning that they are considered to be one source for purposes of notability. A single extremely poor citation does not confer notability even in the best of cases, but this is an article about malware, which Wikipedia should not be writing about unless it is clearly and unambiguously notable (much like the higher standards for hoaxes, or even BLPs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)