Deletion of Clarawood

Comment: Agreed with LK, keep and develop as long as Clarawood123 doesn't take a  approach. Special:Contributions/86.130.124.145|86.130.124.145
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: I tried to edit a bit back in March, in order to make the article more |Manual of Style-compliant, but got https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clarawood&diff=709826729&oldid=709825809 reverted. Looking at the page history, others seem to have experienced similar situations. While there is not much wrong with an article about a neighbourhood like Clarawood as a , I do advise the page creator to act less as if one s the article. Some have more knowledge about Clarawood, others are more experienced in creating the Wikipedia looks; working together is what results in good encyclopedic articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS||WP:GEOFEAT||WP:OWN)