Deletion of Joseph J Sherman

Comment: Usually when I find the phrase "X is notable because" within an article, it is a red flag that the subject isn't notable.  However, it often helps to be able to quickly establish why a subject is deserving of encyclopedic coverage, and it isn't immediately apparent to me here.  However#2, the article has established notability via  with multiple instances of substantial coverage by reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Assuming Sherman is notable, he would be notable for the same reason anyone is - that he has been noticed by reliable sources.  There is no need for the article to say "he is notable because X".  On the second point, the article does indeed need work, but AfD is not for cleanup. Not the relevant question: is Sherman notable?  Sources 2, 10, & 14 are reliable and in depth coverage. (I am making a small assumption that the Hebrew source, #10, is truly Sherman as I can't read Hebrew.)  That would make Sherman notable under the |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Has significant coverage in |Reliable sources which are |verifiable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: The sources certainly meet . Haredi newspapers and magazines often look for stories of converts for their Shavuot issues, but this person seems to be getting ongoing coverage in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: this article has enough  & 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)