Deletion of Hal Turner 2

Comment: The article, before it was abusively blanked, provided three dozen reliable and verifiable sources to establish notability in the clearest possible manner. As is unfortunately becoming a disturbing trend, the excuse of supposed  issues is being maliciously abused as an excuse to delete the article. If there are  issues, they need to be identified and cleaned up. Using  as an excuse to delete this article is liking using an atom bomb to kill a fly: it might solve the problem, but the side effects are far worse than the supposed cure. Appropriate administrative measures should be taken to prevent further such abuse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP||WP:BLP)

Comment: As the nomination only cites  concerns, the negative information in the article is well sourced by mainstream organizations and newspapers.  Further the article in it's last form was as neutral as one can be for a white supremacist.  I simply do not see the BLP issues, nor have they ever been pointed out.  Any unsourced information can easily be deleted.  However, I do question whether the subject has sufficient notability to warrant an article (I recognize I am in the minority on that issue, and concede the point
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)