Deletion of Comparison of tutoring websites

Comment: unlike the others listed for comparison, which contain numerous wikilinks, this one fails . Also it would have to be permanently tagged as Wikipedia:Template_messages/Cleanup#Time-sensitive|outdated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLINK)

Comment: It would also be a good idea to visit . The article is not written like an encyclopedia entry. It is written like a commisioned report. "By Tutoring Site or Tutoring Website we mean", "I am a co-founder of one of the tutoring websites". When do you ever see articles on Wikipedia refering to "I" or "We"? Just because it is useful does not make it encyclopedic: see . If it is useful why not make a blog or a website for it? It'd get more hits on Google than on Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: per the above. The correct course here would be to make a list of notable tutoring websites - that is, websites for which we already have an article (with the appropriate sources, etc). Then, a list of such websites could be appropriate. But this article, in its present form, doesn't work. The links don't support on-wiki content, as they should per ; rather, the links ''are'' the content, which doesn't work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:EL)