Deletion of Index of Articles Relating to Terms of Service and Privacy Policies

Comment: I prepared the article because the topic is notable, with citations to major newspapers worldwide. The nomination itself says this is "an important topic" and endorses :Category:Terms of service.  The Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates|list and category standard says lists and categories "are synergistic, each one complementing the others... the "category camp" should not delete or dismantle Wikipedia's lists, and the "list camp" shouldn't tear down Wikipedia's category system—doing so wastes valuable resources. Instead, each should be used to update the other." The title shows the topic. The lead divides this into three sections: comparisons, companies, and general. All are closely and clearly related to terms of service and privacy policies. And improvements in this lead are certainly welcome. The Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Development|Lists~Development standard encourages lists like this which show what Wikipedia covers, and which show gaps where more is needed. Lists serve "as natural tables of contents and indexes of Wikipedia" (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Navigation|Lists~Navigation). Piotrus repeats here his concern about OR without citing any. It's worth remembering that  means "facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist", and if someone identifies any, that should be omitted. The nomination twice calls the article a "non-list list." I don't know what that means; maybe someone else can clarify this concern
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)