Deletion of Firearm (tool) (2nd nomination)

Comment: This fails  written as a  based on , appears to be a  case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:TNT)

Comment: Regardless of the title debate, this article would be more appropriate as a list linking to individual tools. Its current form leaves no room for expansion except through , which as the nominator pointed out, already makes up the bulk of the text
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: I'm stuck between '''Rename''' and '''Delete''' See my comment below for updated !vote. One issue with renaming is that I don't know what it should be renamed to, even after some research. I'm not against the concept of this article, as the main firearm article does not overlap with the content, and it does represent a coherent category of tools. I also agree that the title is confusing, as the "arms" in firearms refers to weaponry. The terms "utility firearm" and "utility gun" are regularly used to refer to guns that are simply versatile weapons. Guns as tools are also problematic, as that would include non-projectile examples (e.g. heat gun, glue gun). What do we call ''these'' things, then? Even if we think of a title, the article is still written like an expository essay and needs thorough overhaul.  may apply, especially if the content is heavy in copy-paste.—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)