Deletion of India and state-sponsored terrorism

Comment: or '''Merge''' into State-sponsored terrorism#India but make sure to cite |reliable source there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: some contents to another appropriate title such as "Indian support for LTTE": I have browsed through the references. No third party sources have used language which supports the loaded language in the title itself. Except for the Indian support of LTTE, I dont think most other content would go out because of . Reports of accusations by parties involved in disputes cannot be considered as independent evidence!! Also, #SOAP (the article appears to be for the advocation of a pet point of view which is not shared by independent sources) and #ESSAY (it is not a site where original research can be peddled). Get some independent sources who say that India has some connection with state sponsorship of terrorism first
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRV||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: This article is a violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view. This article is an attempt to create 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:FALSEBALANCE)

Comment: The article has been expanded significantly since the 2016 Uri attack and following India's counter strike, the sources are not reliable. It must either be deleted to redirected /merged to State-sponsored terrorism#India. The article's tone doesn't adhere to . Moreover there are many maintenance tags on the page such as citation needed, not in citation given, discussion etc. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: classic case of , ,  and many other policies where the nom just wants anti-India stuff "off" the wiki. I have read the sources and 95% of them a , other 5% are  sources, but their use is in thier place. This article contains almost zero%  as editors have taken care not to include anything from themselves. In a nutshell it is a pretty OK article, albeit an irritating one for Indians. Special:Contributions/182.186.167.206|182.186.167.206
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDLI||WP:POVPUSH||WP:OWN||WP:RS||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Dissecting through the delete arguments I find three issues mentioned the most .i.e. 1). lack of |reliable sources covering the topic, 2). POV and 3). Accusations. But I find that there are plenty of |reliable sources covering this topic in parts. Those vying that there are no reliable source covering this topic, I suggest they take another look at the article. Unfortunately for some the criteria of a source being reliable or not has come down to the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:India_and_state-sponsored_terrorism&diff=742405667&oldid=742402902 perceived citizenship of the author .i.e. whether the author is Pakistani or not. It does not matter to them if it is published by an academic publisher. Some of the editors opining delete/merge also agree there is significant coverage of India's support to LTTE to warrant an article. So, I would like to present two sources that discusses a part of rest of the topic significantly.i.e. India's support to terrorist groups of Pakistan and Myanmar (Burma
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: This AfD is in haste, as the article hasn't been stand-alone for a sufficient time. It will develop further. Kautilya3 hasn't used the talk page to mention any such concerns, which makes it moot. I suggest that it be withdrawn for the time being. AfD is not a venue for content disputes. Also, the claim in the nomination is not true, as the number of sources at State-sponsored terrorism and outside |reliable mainstream sources have extensive coverage of such allegations, so |notability is implicitly present. Wikipedia's criteria is |verification, which is also present. Also, the India section at State-sponsored terrorism is very long, so a split is inevitable per the  policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V||WP:SPLIT)