Deletion of List of cancelled games for Microsoft consoles

Comment: Definitely needs improvement, but AFD is  either. It’s definitely a notable subject that gets coverage in general. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cancelled_games_for_Sony_consoles The PlayStation equivalent has 300+ sources in it. I’m not sure I follow the argument - are we really to believe that the cross-section of “cancelled video games” and “games on Microsoft consoles” are not something covered in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: While I can understand why the keep votes are cast, in my opinion, this list does not meet  '"One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list."' a news search {"cancelled games for Microsoft consoles" -wikipedia} returns zero hits.  While this in it's self does not show a failure of notability, I think it shows the existing delete votes have a stronger standing then the existing keep votes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per DreamFocus. Contra the nom, this passes NOTDIR as an index of articles (and arguably organized by their most defining fact), in addition to  and . The "one accepted reason" described at LISTN doesn't contribute anything relevant or helpful here, though "canceled games" are indisputably discussed as a group and it makes sense to subdivide them by platform
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: Per , "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability."  in turn states that lists may exist to serve an informational or navigational purpose
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Even though I'm the nom and favor deletion, on this one I can see the other perspective; {{u|Dream Focus}} made the best argument I can see for keeping based , that  complements multiple categories. Notability commonly falls away here, in favor of utility; it would be Monty Python level silly to try and show many outlines and indexes are notable based on SIGCOV, but they are important parts of WP no one would delete. {{u|Sergecross73}} mentions List of cancelled games for Sony consoles which has views in the 600s which shows that a list of this kind exists and is useful for some readers which is at the heart of CLN
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:AOAL)