Deletion of Leonard G. Johnson

Comment: as a . I know not from where the unreferenced biographical details come from, but the independent sources cited in the article appear to be about the flight. I do not think the amount and degree of coverage indicates that he passes any of the points in , and I disagree with the article creator that secondary sources are of secondary importance.  specifically states that sources "for notability purposes, should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability." ( states something very similar.) I also respectfully disagree with Schmidt who cites a statement in  that points to Wikipedia:Notability (academics), a notability guideline that the subject clearly does not pass
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: As an inventor whose ideas and concepts are being covered in reliable sources, it would seem he meets the criteria for creative professionals as set forth in . And it is to be noted that per guideline, "''many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources.''"  However, as this inventor IS getting coverage, that point is moot.  And a nice aside, is that this inventor has set a "first" in that in 2008, he completed the United State’s '''first pure biofuel transcontinental flight''' using bio-butanol in an experimental airplane he personally built. So this guy is not a BLP1E.  And yes.... the article would definitely benefit from cleanup... but this is |an issue best addressed through regular editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:ATD)