Deletion of Isak Rajjak Shaikh

Comment: does not appear to meet  or  - full of puff, agree with Nom looks like promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: No pass of either or rof
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: A dreadful mess of promotion, incoherent  grumbling and special pleading which has no place in an encyclopaedia. Besides which, there is no |evidence that the subject meets any biographical notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (:WP:POV||:WP:RS)

Comment: The subject has already enough of dealings with Wikipedia!I request the deleting admin to '''|salt''' the title
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: In a weird way, I did find myself eager to read this saga to the end, but I don't see anything that speaks to  or . Maybe there's a Netflix documentary in the subject's future, but not a WP article. I noticed that there is some first-person language in the research section, suggesting some copy-paste, but I couldn't find the original in a Google search
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: This chemist, philosopher, institution developer, philanthropist, human rights activist, health and safety manager, poet, writer and STEM ambassador doesn't show any signs of passing  or , and the article is one of the worst examples of academic self-promotion I've seen on Wikipedia. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: nothing much to confirm notability as almost all the sources seem to be published by the subject of the article himself. Even if subject is notable per  I would suggest starting over
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:BLOWITUP)