Deletion of Kabali

Comment: redirecting the article to the original author would be disastrous as his edits seem very immature and apparently has a history of not responding to talk page posts. I agree it meets the WP:TOOSOON clause, but as nothing in this article is , I say we give it a go for now. Special:Contributions/173.33.180.117|173.33.180.117
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALLING)

Comment: as a topic which exceeds  enough to merit being a #NFF exceptions|reasonable exception to WP:NFF.  Yes, I had up above suggested a redirect (now struck) based upon what was it looked like https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kabali&type=revision&diff=676521636&oldid=676508818 when nominated, but the then-stub article has gone through https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kabali&type=revision&diff=677411463&oldid=676521636 marked improvements to become a decent start or C-class and, as the likely-hood of filming beginning in a very few weeks has increased, I have been convinced that it remaining and being further improved over time and through regular editorial efforts serves the project and its readers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FFILM)