Deletion of Filmwala Pictures

Comment: I was a little torn about this one, but ultimately I'm going to have to agree with the nom and HighKing. The sources are mostly interviews or are clearly based on company announcements, there doesn't appear to be any substantial amount of  involved here. Truely, I suspect it's just , and that in a couple years this production company will have a lot more to base an article on. I think it would be best to file this away, possibly to be restored later when the company has more comprehensive coverage available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I have to agree with the nom, references are not intellectually independent and fail the criteria for establishing notability, failing either  (no journalist accredited),  (based on company announcements and PR) and  (no in-depth coverage of the *company*). None of the references provided actually talk about the topic to hand - the company Filmwala Pictures. The references focus on the movies or the actors and some of the references don't even mention the company. If the movies are notable, they will no doubt have their own articles created. but notability isn't inherited and just because a product of the company may be notable does not mean that the company itseld it. To meet the criteria for establishing notability, there must be indepednent coverage of the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH)