Deletion of Jon K. Newton

Comment: Objective evaluation against  guidelines indicate that the subject falls far short of notability. The usual criterion is c1, but David (nom) shows that Newton's books have very low holdings. Likewise, his scholarship has barely been noted: only 2 GS citations for his cumulative body of work. (Note that Windupboy82 and Orinsa1118, whose edit styles are very similar, are under the misunderstanding that publications confer notability, when in fact it is ''citations to a scholar's publications'' that matter.) The other claims, e.g. being a director of ANZATS, a seminary schools association, or being a dean do not satisfy c6. It appears the 2 SPA accounts are jointly pushing this article and the one on Harvest Bible College, where Newton is on faculty &ndash; smells of possible COI
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: the keep votes above do not demonstrate notability. The criteria are listed at , and the subject doesn't appear to meet any of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)