Deletion of Castro Valley Library

Comment: and improve through normal editing.  I can't understand how an article about a public library can be considered |"spammy".  Public libraries have nothing to sell, and don't benefit from driving Internet traffic to their websites.  As for whether this particular library is notable, that decision should be made based on what |reliable sources say, not on what the nominator "thinks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:RS)

Comment: None of the sources in the article constitute significant coverage in reliable independent sources, and my good faith searches have been unable to find others beyond reports of budget allocations to the library and programs associated with it.  The article therefore fails  and should be deleted as un-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)