Deletion of Anne Quito

Comment: as per previous comment. The awards seem readily to fulfil the  criterion 'The person's work (or works) has ... (c) won significant critical attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: This BLP seems very PROMO to me (list of her articles?).  I can't find any real  on the subject that would meet WP:GNG outside of her Quartz articles (just being a journalist for a lower tier outlet does not make you notable) and coverage in trade publications.  Not a mention in the NYT?  I don't see any  on her in a Tier 1 .  I can't see her meeting NAUTHOR/NJOURNALIST as she is not an "important figure"/not "known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique"/not has "collective body of work"/not won "won significant critical attention".  Her awards don't seem notable to me, and certainly not enough to swing the dial on NJOURNALIST give how weak everything else is. Struggling to see where the consensus for such a little known journalist for a lower-tier/trade publications is coming from; particularly given the strong PROMO-COI-UDP nature of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)