Deletion of Cheongye Kwan

Comment: I just read the article, and to be quite honest, feel that it does satisfy |Wikipedia's guidelines. it is reliably sourced (as shown with the http://www.prestoncitizen.co.uk/sport/1910795.black_belts_for_martial_arts_students/ ''Preston Citizen'', ''Bristol Evening Post'', ''Taekwondo & Korean Martial Arts Magazine'', ''Cambridge University BTA Interviews'', ''The Lancashire Evening Post'' and ''Rochdale Observer'' coverage). Since I believe the notability of the article is satisifed, the issues of conflict of interest, lack of google hits (which are a rather blunt tool for use in assessing notability) and self-promotion are rather weak arguments for deletion. They can be fixed. I would also like to add, to whoever closes this discussion, that two of the arguments for deletion were posted when the article had 2 sources stating notability. It now has 11 ''independent'' sources. And to refute the argument posed by Wayne, it is determined by the Phillip Rhee source that the martial arts is not localised. Thank you. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)