Deletion of Unqork

Comment: I improved the article with more info and sources. They all look good now - better than the ones listed on the talk page.  The company is a tech unicorn with significant coverage in independent third party sources. There's more in Crain's NY Business but it's paywalled so I didn't bother adding it. Satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: u|100Bunnies}} has disclosed on their talk (and now on their userpage) that they are an employee of Unqork; their contributions here up to this date have constituted . I haven't blocked, since they have no disclosed and offered to withdraw from this discussion and abide by the relevant guidelines, but I wanted to note that connection here for your information
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:UPE)

Comment: I don't see why the combined sources mentioned here and on Unqork's page can't pass . These may be worth adding to the page: https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/doh/provdrs/renters/news/2021/may/mayor-lightfoot-and-chicago-department-of-housing-announce--79-8.html, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Madoff_An_Unholy_Alliance/3Ov4DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Unqork%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA122&printsec=frontcover and  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-26/goldman-plows-more-funding-into-no-code-software-startup (the third is already a part of Goldman Sachs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: SIGCOV)

Comment: A big no. Promotion of a startup company which is nowhere passes  and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)