Deletion of White savior narrative in film (3rd nomination)

Comment: this nomination just reeks of . As others have stated it is well referenced by reliable sources and surpasses our general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: As mentioned in the previous AFD's this narrative is noted in critical and scholarly research. It clearly meets . The suggestion that it is a "white people are bad" article (it is actually much more than this) leads to pointing out that  applies. All WikiP articles are open to editing and improvement - that happens with discussion on the talk page for the article - not by endless AFD's
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: There appears to be sufficient significant coverage in the works of Hugheyhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1525%2Fsi.2010.33.3.475, Schultzhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080%2F01956051.2014.913001 et al to meet notability guidelines; though the independence of those from the ''theory of the trope'' could be questioned. Passing mentions of the ''trope'' in individual films make up the bulk of the article's references, and do not provide significant coverage required to add to |notability, but I conceive that there is still a sufficiency. Improve the article through removal of the contentious list, and refinement of the prose to focus on a discussion & documentation of the trope itself, including attribution of POV; rather than focusing on collating purported uses
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: because the topic is notable through coverage in multiple reliable sources. The trope has even been discussed in recent movies ''The Legend of Tarzan'' and ''Free State of Jones''. The nominator simply |does not like it because they apparently feel offended by the topic (calling it the "animating spirit of anti-white racism" on the talk page). This nomination in spite of overwhelming evidence about the topic shows an attempted POV pushing just because they are squeamish about the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)