Deletion of Wongamat Tower

Comment: It is not a significant development. It is your typical residential tower, in the typical height range for residential condo's that are built in the 10's of thousands all over China, Europe and America. Its a cheap residential block. It fails  as there no in-depth, independent coverage that indicates that it is unique or is architecturally important and the routine coverage confirms that. There is nnothing particularly attractive about the building, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILD)

Comment: Promotional article that appears to be an effort by the developer, designer and/or real estate group to use WP as a venue for advertisment. The citations consist of placements within "news sources" or a press-release type material. Does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILD)

Comment: promotional articles, do not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBUILDING)

Comment: Just because it is a new editor, Wikipedia policies must be suspended, particularly those around ,  and ? No. The editor who created this, created 22 articles in 29 days and the majority of the articles were highly promotional, that read like an advertising brochures, to such an extent that the editor was repoted to COIN, particlarly since most of them were related in some way to Mario Kleff who is entirely non-notable and whose article is at Afd as well. The sources that were used came from clickbait and PR sites, supposedly some in the public domain, resulted in exactly what the PR people were looking for. In a referenced source offered to the Mario Kleff afd, it states about development  in Pattya
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:PROMO||WP:COI)