Deletion of Henry Earl

Comment: Being a "record-holder" is ''not'' given in the GNG as sufficient basis for notability. Guinness lists many thousands of "record-holders" almost none of whom are notable enough for Wikipedia.  Including people with huge collections of single items, etc.  That particular argument should be deprecated as unfounded in Wikipedia policy by anyone closing tis AfD.  I would, moreover, suggest that  in general argues against this article as making contentious claims about a person which may be harmful to that person ...  and since "largest soda can collection" is known, and the owner is ''not'' notable, that should put that particular argument well to rest
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: To review the nomination it appears that the issues are a lack of sources, a notability issue, and a violation of .  For the issue of sources, I have already cited CNN, Daily Mail, and the Huffington Post in the article, in addition to other sources, including the New York Post and ABC News, that I didn't include.  For the issue of notability, I think that being arrested over a thousand times is a rare, if not unique, thing for a person, especially for what seems to be intentional purposes.  Not to mention his web presence due to the images of his numerous arrests that he has had over the years.  , which states the reasons for the notability guidelines, is confirmed at each level in the current article, especially on independent sources.  As for the issue of , I believe that  should help the matter.  Simply put, the multiple arrests are Mr. Earl's claim of his notability as no person has been known to be arrested over a thousand times.  Why it isn't WP:BLP1E could be noted for the fact that this isn't a single event, as BLP1E requires, but a series of events that have led to the present time.  In addition, the focus of the events has also been on his internet fame from those arrests, not just from his overall arrests.   Finally, I would like to note that The Smoking Gun is a part of the Turner Broadcasting System and appears to be a reliable source for this topic, not to mention that it still complies with  as a 'single' source with CNN
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:WHYN||WP:WINAC)

Comment: it's basically  with the same 'event' being just a repeated history of allegations. Per nom, it's one big BLP violation. "Most arrested"? Who cares
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The subject was already a celebrity back in 2004 - see ''http://www.newsweek.com/portraits-town-drunk-131555 Newsweek'' and ''http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=dqY_AAAAIBAJ&sjid=glYMAAAAIBAJ&pg=7124,5229654 Internet love the man who loves...''.  Back then Wikipedia was just getting going and Facebook was being launched.  The fact that he's back in the news yet again tells us that this is quite the opposite of BLP1E which therefore does not apply.  To object to the article because the subject is a street person seems to be blatant |censorship, like saying "we don't want your sort in here".  Such street people may become quite famous and we naturally then have articles about them - see Emperor Norton, Stanley Green and Soho Pam, for example.  If the current draft for this page seems deficient then this is just a matter of ordinary editing.  It is our |editing policy to improve such topics, not to delete them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CENSOR||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: WP:GNG|Notable for multiple events, coverage along years and years: thus it passes . I don't like the article, it is quite a sad thing indeed: but  is not an argument to remove information from the encyclopedia, even if a few above seem to disagree
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Having made the landing page at CNN, it's hard to argue against 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)