Deletion of Miskel Spillman (3rd nomination)

Comment: I just ''read'' , something that very few editors who bandy its title about seem to do, and found that it contains the words
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: The existence of pages for all other SNL hosts is ''not'' what  is intended to mean -- as noted in the page itself, it's 'every Grey's Anatomy character having a page doesn't mean every Office character should', which is a slightly different issue. At any rate, I would agree with the arguments proposed in other AfDs that Spillman is a significant part of the SNL mythos and therefore notable. The strongest I would endorse is a rename to theoretically focus the article more on the episode than on Ms Spillman, but I think  would categorize Spillman as a notable-for-one-event individual who rightfully received an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BIO1E)