Deletion of Murry Salby

Comment: His citation record demonstrates conclusive pass of  c1 &ndash; citation count from WoS: 351, 201, 198, 185, 165, 158, ... (h-index 28). The article needs rewrite. I'll give a day or two of right-of-first-refusal, then have go myself. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: GS h-index of 30+ gives clear pass of rof#C1, even in a well-cited field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per lack of reliable sources and  issues. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.14.25|101.119.14.25
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: He's notable, as Xxanthippe points out (and his book ''Fundamentals of Atmospheric Physics'' has 446 citations), but the page has multiple  violations, and is probably deletable on that basis. He was, it is true, involved in a complex and messy dispute with Macquarie University (the University admits, for example, that while he was overseas "his return flight was cancelled"), but Wikipedia can't assemble a story out of primary sources there. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.14.70|101.119.14.70
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Since the article has been locked in the non-BLP-compliant state, improvement is not really an option, and deletion per  seems the best course. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.15.220|101.119.15.220
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: article in its present state is a bad BLP problem just waiting to happen, but Salby seems to have been notable enough even before his Macquarie University related chicanery hit the press.  Needs a good hard rewrite though to remove the undue focus on that one embarrassing incident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: There is very little in the way of  on his recent history. There is an official statement by Macquarie University, but it responds to none of Salby's allegations (which themselves exist only on unreliable blog posts). There appear to be no reliable news stories on the final outcome of the dispute (other than the fact that his employment was terminated). Legal action is presumably ongoing. It's not even clear what Salby is currently doing. -- Special:Contributions/101.119.14.238|101.119.14.238
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: easily meets  (obviously per #1, probably per other criteria as well).  Strange nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)