Deletion of Abraham Jennison

Comment: as per  - "The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person." While Jennison is mentioned, it is the letter that achieves any notability from the sources provided. Jennison's coverage is incidental as the author of the notable letter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: to Convict era of Western Australia. Loath though I am to wade into these already murky waters, this seems to me the most compelling solution and something in the nature of a compromise. The main arguments seem to hinge on whether the coverage given to Jennison is substantial and non-trivial, and whether  applies. Whether the coverage is significant is debatable and, I think, unanswered; however, the unavoidable fact is that Jennison's notability relies on his writing the letter. As an unusual occurrence (i.e. convict literacy) this event warrants coverage, but the subject of it does not. Merging allows the content to remain but alleviates the notability concerns
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per Masons argument. The wording of  aside, I do not think this guy is truly notable and needs a separate article. His use as an example at Convict era of Western Australia seems an excellent idea
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)