Deletion of Jake Sakson

Comment: My initial response was to vote "delete", since the subject only seems to have one notable credit for the purposes of —but there ''are'' some sources out there, including a very in-depth write-up in the ''Los Angeles Times'' (the first three links): https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092793/jake-sakson-the-los-angeles-times/ here, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092900/jake-sakson-the-los-angeles-times/ here, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092940/jake-sakson-the-los-angeles-times/ here and https://www.newspapers.com/clip/51092963/jake-sakson-indiana-gazette/ here. So, combined with the fact that he was nominated for a notable award (even though that doesn't technically meet ), the page might be justifiable on the grounds of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)