Deletion of Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2012

Comment: Subject is notable and easily passes . A main objection from the earlier Afd's - before the article was retitled and refocused (full disclosure: by me) -  was that it was misleading because it implied that there were "candidates", even though none (save the eventual nominee) had actually been nominated or were actively seeking office.  That has been rectified, the article's subject is now the veep candidate selection process rather than the "candidates". Per LtNOWIS, there may be room for improvement and additional information, but there is significant press coverage of the speculation about, and the eventual selection of, the vp nominee. So notability is clearly established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Note that there is clear precedent for such an article (Republican Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2008, Democratic Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2008, Democratic Party vice presidential candidate selection, 2004). Yes, I know  is not a valid argument for keeping, but given the longstanding protocol of maintaining symmetry among the U.S. election articles, it would seem prudent to nominate all these articles together and they should be ''all'' be either kept, deleted, or merged/redirected as a unit - given that all are comparable in content and sourcing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)