Deletion of Punchline (character)

Comment: per the sources listed, which demonstrate notability, at least at this point. I think the dueling crystal balls can be set aside for now. The character may grow in popularity and continue, or not. We can re-evaluate whether there's  coverage after some time has passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: Interesting. I would have expected the article to be much longer and fancrufty, but the sources are actually better than for many lengthy pieces of fancruft. Still, there is not much outside of , a bit about people cosplaying as her and such. No real reception, significance, or any hint of scholarly analysis. , if you can say so about a comic book character. Maybe we can have a good article about her in few years if she becomes more famous, maybe gets portrayed in the Joker sequel or such
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: This nominator description is extremely misleading, to say the least. It literally says "This article lacks reliable secondary sources except for the reliable secondary sources it cites." And it lobs out the accusations of "fancruft" and "primary sources" even though there are ''no'' primary sources used and there is literally no cruft or plot summary in the article ''at all''; it's entirely written from a real-world perspective. The article is a stub right now, which can and should be expanded in the future, but that's no reason to delete it. The article is supported by reliable secondary sources that provide significant coverage, which establish that it passes , and there are a plethora of other sources out there (more and more each day) not currently in the article that could be used for future expansions, including (but not limited to) the stories below my signature
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Yes, the notability could go either way in the near future. But I'm leaning on the side of , as per Piotr Konieczny above. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Neither  nor  are technically right for this article, but they summarize my opinion pretty well anyway. The character is new. Every source is less than two months old. Give it some time and see if the character sticks. This wouldn't be the Alpha (Marvel Comics)|first time a new character is promoted as the NEXT BIG THING and flops. I'd be moving to draft so editors don't have to start from scratch if the character has staying power
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:TOOSOON)