Deletion of Hugo Selenski

Comment: I don't see enough coverage to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I am puzzled that a http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hugo_Selenski&diff=309284704&oldid=305872507 BLP violation was left in the first sentence of the article, even as someone looked at it and presumably did the  research before nominating it.  Of the present refs, one from a TV station. which only links to present news and not a story about the subject of the article, and a broken link to CNN coverage. The local TV station has some historical coverage of Selenski at http://www.wnep.com/search/dispatcher.front?Query=selenski&target=article. That coverage says he was not convicted of the original murder charges but convicted of abusing corpses by burning the bodies http://www.wnep.com/wnep-selenskinotguiltyofmurder-4623403,0,1084383.story and convicted in July 2009 of home invasion in 2003 http://www.wnep.com/wnep-mon-selenski-sentenced,0,1682165.story, and that he still faces charges for 2 murders. Just not seeing that  is satisfied, and it seems to fall under . If he is eventually convicted of some murders, or gets secondary coverage, or has some enduring societal effects, an article could be recreated. Even with http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Hugo+Selenski&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a 1190 news stories since 2003, it still seems like routine crime and punishment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BIO||WP:NOTNEWS)