Deletion of David Talbott (4th nomination)

Comment: So much referenciness, and yet so little of substance. A namecheck in Palmer (presumably RS but trivial mention), Atlantis Rising Magazine, very ''very'' unreliable, a book by the subject (can't establish notability and advances the ridiculous Electric Universe theory to establish unreliability), a book about Velikiovsky, not Talbott, another book by the subject, an  interview with the subject in an unreliable source, a staff listing (), an unreliable source or four, another book by the subject, another book about Velikovsky... well, you get the picture. This article is a walled garden: a collection of circular references, an account of the beliefs of a crank drawn largely from his own words and without ever establishing notability independent of the great granddaddy of all cranks, Velikovsky. I have recently read a book on the history of Valikovsky and also Idiot America, I can find no mention in either, so this is clearly a crank mentioned only in some descriptions of works about another, much more important crank
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: If a low-notability  topic has little coverage by ''independent'' sources, then it's impossible for us to maintain a W:NPOV|neutral article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)