Deletion of Diagnostics of Karma

Comment: The Russian sources are certainly enough for, e.g., . (Being widely translated or published in big runs doesn't automatically confer notability to a book but it almost always goes hand in hand with a very easy pass of BOOKCRIT.) It looks like the article has some POV problems based on the Russian version flagging it as pseudoscience, but that's irrelevant to a deletion debate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BOOKCRIT)

Comment: This discussion page was created without the {{tl|afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log.  Fixed now--I have no opinion of my own on the nomination.  {{ping|Алёна Пескова}} For future nominations, please fully follow the instructions at .  Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)

Comment: The sources - while not in English - are sufficient to pass notability for books,  as mentioned above. There is also a critical page in English
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BOOKCRIT)

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BOOKCRIT)