Deletion of Louis St. Lewis

Comment: Modernist expresses my view on this exactly. Also, the IP states that the artist falls between print and the internet. They're referring to the difficulty of finding references, but I think it also applies to the artist's notability: enough for some mentions in the local press, but not enough for the kind of mainstream newspapers and specialist art magazines that have a large presence on the internet. Notability isn't decided by Google, but since a 47 year old artist can't really be described as pre-internet the lack of online sources is a real problem. Especially because we're talking about someone who's claim to notability is slight to begin with. Reluctant delete as having a minor claim to notability per , but one that can't be verified with reliable third-party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: if there really were numerous reviews of St Lewis' work, the article should easily be sourced. Sadly, it isn't, thus failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)