Deletion of Philip Chempakassery

Comment: Nothing shows that the notability requirements of either  or  are met. As for the SPA votes, even if we  and disregard the possibility of sockpuppets, their votes do not give any real arguments to keep the article, nor do they provide any sources establishing notability. So any closing admin that doesn't just count !votes should disregard those votes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AGF)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I fail to see how he passes . The professors at major research universities (top 10-20) that don't have Wikipedia articles because they don't meet . I don't quite see how Chempakassery being prof at a seminary makes him special. He might be notable as chief editor of Aikya Samiksha, but with 7 ghits and no comments on the relevancy of that journal here, I strongly doubt this a significant achievement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)