Deletion of Dungeon (The Legend of Zelda Series)

Comment: Well, no, that's not what wikipedia is about. Wikipedia is about building a premier encyclopedia on the web. Of course, that often means helping editors improve their ideas... but it also means there are many policies we must follow, such as the ones we've mentioned - like  and  (and in this case , since we're discussing whether the article should exist). As I mentioned in my delete vote, the problem with the article is that it is largely |original research and has no reliable sources to demonstrate |notability. Also, I would respectfully suggest that most editors are, in fact, fully capable of taking a detatched approach to articles they created or may have strong personal feelings about
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:NOTE||WP:OR||WP:NOTE)

Comment: Cocoapropo, your research is called source based research (as in primary source). Look here  and it will tell you about source based research, and how it can come straight from a video game, and that it is not OR at all. It will also tell you that primary sources such as this are allowed on WP, even though a lot of editors forget that. All you need to do to save your article is find some reliable secondary sources to back up you primary source. Nintendo power, news articles, fan cites ext. I believe that this is a notable topic and the most that should be done is move the whole thing to The Legend of Zelda (series) under its own heading. Obviously Zelda is notable, and you can't talk about Zelda without talking about the dungeons. Also, yes the article does need cleaned up, but thats not a reason to delete it. Cocoapropo, another thing about WP, unfortunately information added does need sources. And unfortunately again, you don't need sources to delete something. Saying "I think this is true" holds no ground whatsoever, but saying "I think this is false" is a valid argument. Its in no way fair, but its the way WP is run
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I reformatted your edit only so it doesn't disrupt the rest of the daily AfD page - nothing personal. As for your question: please reference 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Primarily  with no reliable sources to demonstrate notability of the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as fails #GUIDE, but credit to the editors for cited sources for their work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)