Deletion of The Cochran Firm

Comment: as suggested by {{u|MelanieN}}. The subject of this AfD has been mentioned in a multitude of reliable sources including in books and in the news. That being said, never has the subject of this AfD been the primary subject of any of those sources. Members of the subject have received significant coverage, and clients of the subject have received significant coverage, but never the organization/law firm itself. Therefore, not receiving |significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, and only receiving mention, the subject does fall within the scope of the notable late Johnnie Cochran. What is presently verified can be merged into that article, and if sufficient reliable sources with significant coverage can be found in the future to recreate this article are found, or if that article meets , then it is possible that this article can be recreated, but not before then
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SIZERULE)

Comment: to Johnnie Cochran; I don't think it quite makes it as a standalone article. It's a large national law firm; you'd think its size and star power alone might get it to . But most of the coverage is passing mentions, for example when a notable defendant hires them or when one of their attorneys wins a significant case, rather than anything about the firm itself. I found and added to the article one reference which is significantly about the firm. There were other possible sources, describing various lawsuits against the firm by clients or former employees, but those stories did not get picked up by the mainstream press and I don't regard them as significant enough to add to the article or to count toward notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)