Deletion of Jack Fellure

Comment: I have the greatest respect for Roscelese, the nominator, and I disagree with William S. Saturn's argument that this article meets .  However, I believe that the official presidential nominee of an historically notable U.S. political party can also be presumed to be notable.  I favor broad and inclusive coverage of fringe political parties of both the left and the right, and their presidential (or top ranked) candidates. I reach this conclusion despite the fact that I personally violate the tenets of this particular political party frequently.  This is the presidential candidate of a a party behind a movement that passed the only constitutional amendment that was later repealed.  Though this candidate may be obscure, this encyclopedia is not printed on paper, and it has the room to cover fringe third party presidential candidates for a country as important as the United States
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: This seems like a clear case of keep - a nominee of a noteworthy party where all previous nominees have Wikipedia articles as well.  At any rate, as #Politicians points out, leaders of political parties at the national or major sub-national level are considered notable, regardless of electoral success, which would certainly include Fellure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: United_States_third_party_and_independent_presidential_candidates,_2012#Prohibition_Party.  Ah, the things you learn on AfD.  The coverage by third-party sources in definitely in question here for both 2012 and 1992.  Fellure may not be an electable Republican candidate, but he did receive two sources of independent coverage during the initial 1992 Republican primaries in New Hampshire.  However, The http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=YpxDAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vq4MAAAAIBAJ&pg=2998,2672235&dq=jack-fellure&hl=en| Williamson Daily News piece is fairly local and so the http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1991-11-06/news/1991310107_1_federal-election-commission-campaign-documents-elect-a-woman| Baltimore Sun piece is the only significant coverage for the 1992 primaries, and it covers several third-party candidates.  He also was not a nominee at this time.  He has not received enough coverage as a 2012 candidate (yet).  Mentions of his election to the Prohibition Party in what looks like two are insufficient, because they do not constitute "significant coverage" as per .  I also disagree that a nominee for a party constitutes a political office.  A political office assumes some level of political authority, and a nominee does not hold such authority yet.  We could consider moving some of his background and values into the article I suggested
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)