Deletion of Hannah Logasa

Comment: appears to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion#Considerations|Wikipedia Guide to Deletion directs nominators, "First do the necessary homework and look for sources yourself, and invite discussion on the talk page by using the notability template, if you are disputing the notability of an article's subject. The fact that you haven't heard of something, or don't personally consider it worthy, are not criteria for deletion. ''You must look for, and demonstrate that you couldn't find, any independent sources of sufficient depth.''" (Italics mine.) Apparently this nom did not do such a search. In addition,  states, Wikipedia:Notability#Article_content_does_not_determine_notability|''if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability.''  While the article as it existed at the time of AfD nomination had only a single source, a cursory search reveals many reliable sources, including reviews of her many publications on libraries in schools. https://books.google.com/books?id=LiJP-8X9iyoC&pg=PA22 This reference dicusses in depth  her work defining the role of school librarians in progressive education
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)