Deletion of PlayRadioPlay!

Comment: per Yandman. Fails ; no evidence of coverage by independent third-party sources. Only external links are to the band's official site and MySpace page, which do not constitute adequate external coverage. See my comments above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Your argument here is a perfect example of  and . Just because someone ''is going'' to be successful soon doesn't mean they're notable ''now'', unless it can be verified with independent sources. Likewise, just because there are plenty of other Wikipedia articles on obscure bands doesn't mean that those articles ''belong'' on Wikipedia - it just means no one's bothered to nom them for deletion yet. A MySpace page doesn't constitute evidence of notability, even if it gets a lot of traffic.  demands ''third-party reliable sources'', i.e. sources independent of the band itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I'm sorry to say it in the face of such enthusiasm, but I don't think PlayRadioPlay yet meets our guideline . Based on that, , and , I agree with the nom that this should be salted until PlayRadioPlay meets the guidelines. Which I hope will be soon, and I wish the band and their supporters the best of luck in making that happen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:INN||WP:CRYSTAL)