Deletion of Phyrexia

Comment: despite the little of value to save from this article, I am still left a little uneasy voting delete. Verifiability is easily met, and I have seen many articles survive with notability sources worse than a wired blog and an online magazine article, before mentioning the book references. There appears to be a release of something called new Phyrexia in June and with over 1.5 million google hits, I certainly don't have the time to check all the sources. While I don't think that WP:GAMEGUIDE strictly applies to boardgames the way that it has recently been applied, clearly the current article has  problems so should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:INUNIVERSE)

Comment: As stated in the nomination, the article fails |verifiability and |notability. It also is a |plot-only description of a fictional work with no real-world context. With no references independent of the subject from #Reliable sources and notability|third-party sources to presume notability, there is no basis to keep the article. I do not believe that a merge is an acceptable option because the text in the article is a detailed plot-only description of a fictional work and OTDIR|Wikipedia is not a complete exposition of all possible details. I also do not believe that the topic Phyrexia is needed to understand the card game ''Magic: The Gathering'', so the content of the article can be perfectly omitted. A simple mention in a list (as it is right now in Plane (Magic: The Gathering)#Artificial Planes) is more than enough. In my opinion, all text in the nominated article is material more in line with a |game guide than Wikipedia. While it may have several |Google hits, |existence is not the same as notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:PLOT||WP:V||WP:NOTDIR||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:GHITS||WP:ENN)