Deletion of Donald Sanborn

Comment: I don't see any independent sources; if he is a leader of a large group he would meet  as a bishop; if this is a church of 100 congregants and 10 bishops he would not be.  The current article is also wildly non-neutral; a person who is not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church should not be described as a "Roman Catholic Bishop" regardless of their theological claims.  {{ping|Ad Orientem|TonyBallioni}} to maybe comment on the theological issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:CLERGY)

Comment: And if "strong keep" has any weight, then make it "strong." The  is overwhelming. How can the nominator claim that there is no  when even the NYtimes has articles on him with expanded explanations of the controversies he has helped generate? How could anyone claim that this bishop does not pass  when the guideline says, "The bishops of major denominations, including Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican Communion bishops, are typically found to be notable." The sources provided above plus the improvements in the article should have quenched any doubts of this article's notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:CLERGY)