Deletion of Phunckateck Communications

Comment: That is not how I read . Criterion #6 specifically says that an ensemble may derive notability from multiple notable members. Note that I am not currently arguing Keep or Delete. To qualify under  #6, we would need to establish for one that this is a performing ensemble in its own right, rather than a looser confederation or group of friends, and of course that multiple members are indeed themselves notable (and that they are actual ''members'' rather than associates; "rumored" doesn't cut it here). If those are established, I would consider it a "keep" per that criterion. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: I posted a (second) PROD notice on the article today (not noticing the first one) and it was taken down.  The person who removed it posted to the talk page saying that they, and others, had been listing references which noted the collective's significance.  I see only one reference site (used four times) which is nothing but a database.  Nothing signifying why the collective is '''notable''' as opposed to simply in existence.  Since the first PROD notice, they've had nearly two weeks to make this article better but all it has become is a directory, which |Wikipedia is not.  The article fails notability standards under either  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:CORP||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Doesn't meet the criteria at ; lacks multiple notable members (and even UFO! is debatable), international tours, etc.  Doesn't appear to be notable in its own right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: I'm sorry, 99.7, but it doesn't work that way. If there are not articles in reliable sources that substantially discuss Phunckateck Communications '''''as a named entity''''', then there is no subject matter notable enough to sustain an  encyclopedia article. Phunckateck can't derive notability from the notability of persons who belong(ed) to it or are/were associated with it: |"notability is not contagious
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS)