Deletion of Promotion of homosexuality

Comment: The article is mostly off-topic.  There is negligible detail about the promotion of homosexuality, it is more or less assumed.  What there is consists mostly about countries' opposition to the promotion of homosexuality.  If there was merit in any of that, it would be citing verifiable and accurate instances of promotion that lead to the laws preventing its promotion.  In that it fails to do so (apart from scouring dubious websites for 'news') the whole article represents  and/or .  Either delete or merge with either the LGBT rights opposition or Homosexual agenda or anti-LGBT bias
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: the original was a  mess, but the changes since could make it into a real stub.  A redirect or merge may be more appropriate.  If kept, it would have to be semi-protected to avoid vandalism or trolling
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: and redirect to Homosexual recruitment. Yes, I know , but none of this material should be merged anywhere, and that article is the best I could find as a target for the phrase. The legal matters are already treated at LGBT rights by country or territory, and Societal attitudes toward homosexuality covers attitudes of the populace at large
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:LICENSE)

Comment: There's just no way to write an |NPOV article with this title (and even if there was, this article ain't it).  And grammatical arguments aside, this is pretty much pure |SYNTH at this point. And even if we set those points aside, I don't see what could get put here that isn't dealt with in a more neutral manner elsewhere. Even with the update, this article still suffers from NPOV and NOR issues. Terms like "opponents of the promotion of homosexuality..." shouldn't be tossed around liberally, as not everyone is going to think the same way. And my original point remains: the title is still not neutral, and the material here is already present in a better form elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SYNTH)