Deletion of George M. Zinkhan

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: When I stumbled on this article yesterday, it contained almost exclusively information about the alleged crime. I spend some time digging up stuff about his career (not too difficult, given his detailed CV on the university website). I was surprised myself to see how easily Zinkhan passes the bar for several of the notability criteria of . I also redirected several other articles to this one (even though I almost got into an edit war with someone who thought all three victims "deserved" their own articles; thanks for your help there Ukexpat :-). I agree with DGG that the article needs to be monitored and the current version, giving less emphasis to the alleged crime (even if at some point the crime would be proven and there would be a conviction). Risker is right that it is the other stuff that makes Zinkhan notable, not the alleged crime which is all too common. One question to Risker (just for my education), how does the current article not meet our naming conventions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: I was the admin who deleted under G10 yesterday. The version of the article which I speedily deleted contained no references at all and did not assert the level of notability required for either  or /CA, as I http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ABiographies_of_living_persons%2FNoticeboard&diff=286171546&oldid=286170446 noted on  at the time that I deleted. I agree that there is the possibility that an article is possible for this person, and the one that is the subject of this AFD is much closer. In my own opinion, there is undue weight being given to the crime he is alleged to have committed, while the real reasons he is notable, as mentioned above by DGG, are given somewhat short shrift. Even should the subject be convicted of the reported crime, his prior activity is really what makes him notable; sad to say, this type of crime is remarkably commonplace and shouldn't be considered noteworthy in itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:N||WP:BLPN)