Deletion of Lawrence Trent

Comment: This BLP does not meet . If additional RS exist (as claimed), they belong in the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I couldn't find anything substantial in an internet search to indicate sufficient notability (per otability "... address the subject directly in detail", "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention"); the typical minimum standard for notability in WP:Chess is a Grandmaster title (and even that's not enough automatically ensure notability in some cases). I suspect there might be something about Lawrence in ''British Chess Magazine'' or ''Chess magazine'', neither of which I have access to. I support deleting this, with the knowledge that it could be recreated if proper sources were found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Like Sasata, I came up blank when it came to finding substantial multiple independent, reliable, articles about the subject.  Even the lone source at chessbase-shop.com (NOT chessbase.com, but '''the online store''', which utterly fails  no matter what one thinks of chessbase.com itself) doesn't really establish notablity.  He's created two DVD's (neither of which are notable) and finished 7th at a youth championship in 2003, which isn't notable either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Lawence is almost a GM, according to FIDE he reached 2487(http://ratings.fide.com/id.phtml?event=408638), so he's unfortunate not quite a GM yet. He is a chess author, but not a major one. ChessBase is a reliable source in my opinion in that it has editors which check content like a newspaper and published information to a high quality, in practice higher then most newspapers. I haven't found anything published about Lawrence that is substantial or likely to meet . I did find, http://chessbase-shop.com/en/authors/39, and items on 4ncl.co.uk such as http://www.4ncl.co.uk/download/chessmag1213/08-13%204NCL.pdf (game on page 9). So I conclude it is a weak delete but am open to changing my vote if a substantial reliable source is found. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)