Deletion of Energy policy of Turkey

Comment: and stubbify (even further). This looks like a  creation to hang the Greenpeace "controversy". Not to say it was done in bad faith, but it reads very POV due to balance problems. In fact I'm not even sure the controversy section is notable for inclusion on Wikipedia, or that it is even a controversy. I would support a 1-sentence stub to get the topic started, and move the "controversy" to the talk page until later authors can balance the article, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NPOV)