Deletion of Scott Horton (radio host) (2nd nomination)

Comment: I believe the subject meets both  and .  I've found some independent reviews of the subject's book in widely circulated publications (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/fools-errand-a-guide-to-the-new-forgotten-war/), and also found the subject featured on CSPAN's Book TV, and a few other outlets.(https://www.c-span.org/video/?441886-2/fools-errand)(https://mises.org/library/scott-horton-endless-war-afghanistan)(https://tomwoods.com/ep-1444-scott-horton-on-20-years-of-foreign-policy-horrors/).  There are also 100+ amazon reviews by verified purchasers of the book.  His book actually seems to meet multiple criteria for notability itself ().  I also found an example of the Subject publicly debating Bill Kristol, a well known foreign policy expert and political analyst(https://www.thesohoforum.org/).  The subject is clearly regarded as an important figure among his peers and within the area of American foreign policy.  Subject also has 20k+ twitter followers, which of course doesn't establish notability on its own, but shows that he seems to have a substantial following.  While I agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK)

Comment: I've been swinging my opinion with keep or delete, and choose delete. Almost all of the sources appear to be associated with Scott Horton, and are not independent of him. I've done a '''Scott Horton" radio host''', and I get no independent results. If it fails , it's not notable. I would've choose keep because it |can {{small|(or will)}} be improved as shown above and a currently a COI edit request with the proposed addition of sources. But once again, the sources are not ''independent'' of the subject. However, cCitations are just for |verification of statements, and you only need enough citations to ''fully'' verify a statement. The proposed additions are |citation overkill, which is excessive turning the purpose of citations from verifiability to notability. With my statement, as of right now with my argument knocking out ''all'' of the keep !votes, it's 2 delete, 0 keep. &#123;&#123;Template:replyto|replyto&#125;&#125
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:VERIFY||WP:OVERCITE)