Deletion of Combined Community Codec Pack

Comment: strikes me as notable. I don't even use it (or windows), but I'm aware of it and I see the justification for the claims that it's better than most other codec packs. I'm not the one to fix this article, but I strongly suspect it can be brought in compliance with  etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The CCCP is a very widely used codec pack.  '''Real Alternative''' and '''Quicktime Alternative''' were similar codec packs nominated for deletion and kept, as they are just as notable.  AfD is not where you ask to get articles cleaned up: the CCCP is quite clearly notable, and just because the article contains unsourced POV doesn't mean it should be deleted.  If there is unsourced information, ''delete it''!  |Be bold!  Don't delete an article to solve problem's with its content. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BB)