Deletion of Rana Gujral

Comment: per nom, no real sources that indicate notability. Pretty clear  as well. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: the subject doesnt pass , , and not even  among other criteria. Also a doubtful thing is the creator of the article claims to be new to wikipedia, yet they knew about the previos https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Rana+Gujral deletion. Assuming good faith, it is possible that they carefully did read the notice before creating the article stating it was created n deleted previously. But as mentioned on their talkpage, they have (mostly) edited only two artcles created by themselves. Like noted above, COI/UPE is highly likely. —usernamekiran
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCREATIVE||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Does not meet  as he has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Nor do his achievements mentioned in the article suggest that he meets .  The article has been created by an account with a likely conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO||WP:GNG)