Deletion of Amanda Hughes

Comment: as per nom. One of the two refs currently in the article does not, when followed, even mention Hughes. The other is fairly substantial, but seems to be in a local weekly paper about a local author, whcih does not establish |notability. Does not pass any part of uthor. A Google search found only self-published sources, personal blogs, appearance listings, book listings at amazon and other vendor sites, and pages about other people of the same name. The already cited ABC article was by far the deepest coverage I found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:A)

Comment: 4 members out of 1.7 million at LibraryThing have bookshttp://www.librarything.com/work/14218170 which is a bad first sign of a notable author, the most popular book just 3 copies. Although LibraryThing is not how we directly measure notability, the low numbers indicate not many people own the books and thus they have not received much in the way of book reviews in reliable sources (which is how we measure notability per  #3). This is confirmed by the author's website which includes reviews, but they are all unreliable sources, customer reviews or blogs. Except for Midwest which is a sort of review mill. The ABC news article is a good start but not enough for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)