Deletion of ProtonMail

Comment: Per {{u|A.WagnerC}}. The notability policy  says, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: enough coverage for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Yes, there are many sources without independence or reliability. However, there are also independent and reliable sources as https://www.theregister.com/2015/11/05/protonmail_ddos_attack/ The Register, https://web.archive.org/web/20170120080052/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/19/protonmail_launches_tor_hidden_service/ The Registar again, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-protonmail/russia-blocks-encrypted-email-service-protonmail-idUSKBN1ZS1K8 Reuters, https://web.archive.org/web/20160327090617/http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/read/protonmail-the-easy-to-use-encrypted-email-service-opens-up-to-the-public Vice, https://www.bit-tech.net/news/tech/software/protonmail-paypal/1/ Bit-Tech, https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/uber-secure-protonmail-beta-maxes-out-servers-in/ Info Security and https://gizmodo.com/protonmail-unveils-an-overdue-makeover-and-new-features-1847054759 Gizmodo. The coverage goes beyond routine coverage. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)