Deletion of Serangoon Public Library

Comment: Agree it is not notable. I did search for sources though, and the nom. ought to mention a  in case there is some notability that is not apparent from the poor state of the article. It gets mentioned in books, but only as a location in the same way countless other libraries are mentioned. It also gets mentioned a couple of times for being built on a roof, including this source: http://ljmu-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/2500/. This appears to be its most notable feature, but the mention here is not substantial and does not make it notable. If the building were iconic and listed in some offical database or list of iconic buildings, it would be likely to meet notability guidelines, but I found no evidence that it was. Thus my view is deletion is appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)