Deletion of Jessica Fitzwater

Comment: per Bearcat and EM Gregory. There is an expectation that county elected officials receive significant national or international coverage to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: does not pass  and not otherwise notable under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: The county level of government is ''not'' an automatic  pass for every county councillor who exists — it can occasionally be valid grounds for inclusion if and when a county councillor can be |reliably sourced to a volume and depth and range of coverage that marks her out as significantly ''more'' notable than the norm, but it is ''not'' an automatic notability freebie that automatically gets every county councillor in the door just for existing as a county councillor. But the referencing here is ''not'' getting her over  in lieu, because half of it is |primary sourcing that does not assist notability at all, and the half that is reliable sourcing is purely ''local'' reliable sourcing of the type and volume that's merely ''expected'' to exist for ''all'' county councillors in their own local media. (And as for Bangabandhu's new sources above, those are still ''local'' coverage in the Baltimore-DC corridor, not national coverage that makes her special — even the "NPR" citation is not to NPR's ''national'' news division, but to its ''local'' station ''in Baltimore''.) This simply is not cutting it in terms of making a county councillor notable enough for inclusion.And , so the fact that some or all of her other colleagues have articles too isn't a reason why this has to be kept — they may need to be deleted as well, and/or may have a stronger claim to surpassing the "more notable than the norm for county councillors" condition. (For example, ''I've'' heard of Kirby Delauter often enough to recognize his name on sight even though I'm ''Canadian'', but even ''he'' still may just be a  rather than a subject who's actually earned a genuinely substantive claim to being more notable than his colleagues.) So each of those articles will need to be individually reviewed for whether they're actually meeting our requirements or not, but none of them are ''entitled'' to articles just for ''existing'' as county councillors ''either'', so they do not constitute evidence that Fitzwater has to be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: She is a county commissioner, that is, a member of an elected body of 5 commissioners who select and hire a professional county executive - this makes her the equivalent of a member of the city council of a city of 250,000 with a Council–manager government. Problem is, coverage appears to be routine.  So I took a close look at the sources cited by Bangabandhu just above. Frederick is a D.C. suburb, and the WaPo coverage is local (in the "Maryland Politics" section,) The USA Today article is in the delmarvatoday edition of the paper. Ditto for the regional daily Baltimore Sun. And the radio story ran on WYPR, Baltimore Public Radio (regional). All four cover her role in articles covering a specific policy debate, and all are regional.  What I would need to  see to rate her notable, is non-campaign profiles or feature stories focused on Fitzwater, or inclusions of her in media outside the region.  She is very active, so it is probably merely 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN||WP:TOOSOON)