Deletion of EditPad

Comment: #General_criteria|G11 requires inapproptiate ''content'', not just have a product as its subject.  #Articles|A7 is for articles about people, groups, companies and websites, not software products
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Also note, that CodeGuru, PC Mechanic and Softkey.info are probably not considered as |reliable source. They are not even covered by Wikipedia themselves in any way. Softpedia provides ''100% clean certificates'' only, they do not review the software. Anyone can submit any software on Softpedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Per above discussion, nominator should re-read 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Reliable source does not need to be covered by wikipedia. However, the  reads, that a reliable source is for example a peer-reviewed journal. In particullar, you might find a ''good-bad review'' of every text editor somewhere, but only some text editors are covered by well established ''peer-reviewed'' magazines. Are PC Mechanic and Softkey.info established peer-reviewed magazines (or other things named in )? Do they suggest notability? I do not need an answer. My comment should only pointed to the fact, that they might not be enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)