Deletion of Salvation, Texas (book)

Comment: That the award-winning author does not yet have an article is a reason to write one... but not a valid reason to otherwise deny the notability of the author or the author's work. That the author and book can meet  is enough to allow both the article and the project to be improved through normal editing. A sampling of sources (Not blogs) addressing the work or the author: http://www.reporternews.com/news/2008/jul/19/hairdresser-detectives-take-show-on-the-road/ Abilene Reporter-News, http://www.theeagle.com/lifestyles/Heroines-find-trouble-in-NYC The Eagle, http://www.romantictimes.com/books_review.php?book=30989 RT Book Reviews, http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/ent/stories/DN-dixiecash_1024gl.State.Edition1.2467a99.html Dallas News, http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-153297910/good-ol-gals-romance.html Dallas Morning News, http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-139034382/cash-dixie-my-heart.html Library Journal, http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/ent-life/author_expands_dictionary_of_western_terms_10-23-2008.html Beaumont Enterprise. AfD is not for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as acceptable split for positively reviewed book concerning titular setting in actually two different Romance novels.  Support creating article about author as well, as author has written multiple books for which additional reviews exist.  Thus, at worst we would merge and redirect to an article on the author per , , and
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)