Deletion of Casey Calvert (actress) (2nd nomination)

Comment: She's written about in ''The Guardian''https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/jul/29/jon-ronson-bespoke-porn-nothing-is-too-weird-all-requests, ''The Daily Telegraph|The Telegraph''https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/the-private-lives-of-very-public-porn-stars/, ''Vice (magazine)|Vice''https://www.vice.com/en/article/xg88jn/sex-love-time-quarantine-erika-lust, ''Buzzfeed News''https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/blakemontgomery/porn-pornhub-mindgeek-girlfriend-experience. She passes the GNG. ''Rolling Stone'' calls her one of the industry's top names which is evidence of .https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/coronavirus-porn-industry-pandemic-gang-bang-milf-covid-19-1027729
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: fails  and I don't think an interview counts as a RS because unless I'm remembering wrong interviews are considered primary sources. Whatever a sub guideline might say. Although, I do think they can better to use then the GNG in some cases, just not this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Actors and media personalities can be considered  based on more relaxed guidelines than GNG. An exclusive interview in  is analogous to a profile in RS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: meets  in that she receives significant coverage in reliable and verifiable secondary sources and those sources are listed. Quantity does not matter as much as quality but when quality is put with quantity it is a win for the encyclopedia. What constitutes a reliable secondary source can differ when going from one industry to another or even one culture to another. Nothing else matters to me but GNG in this case. I look at essays and guidelines if a subject is on the fence in regards to GNG and it needs help pushing it one way or the other. For the record, I am not a member of ARS but I commend any project that seeks to increase the number of included/improved articles while helping to maintain the integrity of the encyclopedia. I also feel the attacks on them above are seriously uncalled for and "AGF" is a cornerstone of Wikipedia, not just for new editors but all editors. I think we all could learn to be a little more civil in our tone and the words we use, myself included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Extensively referenced, clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)