Deletion of List of Strawberry Shortcake fillies

Comment: per / borderline badvertisement as above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: as per , characters are non-notable, in order for them to be notable they must have recicved real world coverage and as far as i can see they have not recicved this coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: per , as this is little more than an advertisement of merchandise that is manufactured by American Greetings, Inc., for little girls to collect.  Ingenious.  Yes, you have Ginger Snap, but do you have her pony friend, Cookie Dough?  What's wrong, doesn't your Mom love you
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, organized, and verfiable list concerning subject from notable franchise).  WP:FICT lacks consensus as indicated on the top of the page.  "Wikipedia:Cruftcruft|Cruft" and |per so and so are not valid reasons for deletion.  Referencing concerns should be addressed per Wikipedia:SOFIXIT.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:PERNOM)

Comment: Practically ''only'' |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: it's a |spinout article of Strawberry Shortcake. Although, you could '''merge''' it into List of Strawberry Shortcake characters if you wanted to make that list even longer.  doesn't apply because this is not an organization.  doesn't apply because this article isn't an ad. It's not |OR to summarize a source. And  isn't even a guideline. The word "fancruft" is Newspeak, nothing more. You might as well say "doubleplusungood." It's a thought-terminating cliché
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT||WP:CORP||WP:NOTADVERTISING||WP:OR||WP:FICT)