Deletion of AMD K12

Comment: delete for lack of significant coverage in multiple ''independent'' reliable sources.  It is fair to say that all the factually information here is from AMD, since the chip has not been released, hence no independence.  Also, Wikipedia is not in the |predicting business.  "There is many a slip twixt the lip and the cup." Again FN1 & FN2 sources appear to be from press releases. Scott Wasson's piece (FN4) at least brings in some analysis.  But as he said in 2014, ''As always, everything depends on the specifics. AMD has to deliver these products, and they have to perform well in order to matter.'' That is a pretty suscinct statement that notability can only occur later, hence 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: There is enough reliable source coverage for this stub article and to satisfy . Stub articles are common in Wikipedia and there's no guideline or policy that I know of, that supports deleting properly sourced stub articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)