Deletion of Ashley Todd

Comment: WP:NOT#NEWS|Wikipedia is not a news source. No one will remember her name in a week, and neither should they. Therefore delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Wikipedia is not the news and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Clear  violation. Cover the event, not the person. Move to something like "Ashley Todd false mugging claim or something like that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Clearly violates the |BLP policy (on people notable for only one event). Policy violation = delete. Wikipedia is not the news, and she will be here today and gone tomorrow. Speaking purely to common sense and ignoring policy: Deleting this article doesn't mean the information doesn't need to disappear, it can easily be added to the campaign article. What is important about this is the ''event'', not the ''person''. Independent bios are for notable people. Notable sub-events in a campaign should be added to a campaign's article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: If #NEWS and  have any meaning whatsoever, this has got to go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and  - this is '''not''' "''verifiably of significant lasting and historical interest and impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is as stated above a minor news item and will be forgoten about in 6 months time as per #NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This person is |only known for one event.  How the relevant event will be best treated (its own article, a few sentences in some other article about the presidential race, or not at all) is a separate issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I do not think there are valid  concerns here.  1E says "Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them."  In this case, the "larger subject" is ''the fraudulent actions that Ashley Todd chose to commit''.  There is no way that Ashley Todd can do something which splashes the photo of her face, with the backwards 'B' she put on it herself, on TV screens and computer monitors all across the nation, and then say "oh, but ''I myself'' am still a low-profile individual."  Other  concerns only apply if the information is poorly sourced, but I see no evidence of that.  Now, one might argue that the "larger subject" itself, the entire "Ashley Todd affair", is only a transitory blip on the screen, and will be forgotten four weeks from now.  That's very possible but I do not think we should be looking into our  balls and declaring that ''unknown'' state of the future to be established fact and calling for a deletion on that basis.  I would fully support holding a deletion discussion in three or four weeks -- but I think that calling for deletion ''now'' is premature. -- Special:Contributions/65.78.13.238|65.78.13.238
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP||WP:CRYSTAL)