Deletion of Jonah Mungoshi (2nd nomination)

Comment: This autobiographical version is much more promotional than the previously-deleted version, but better referenced .  However, few of the refs are to reliable sources. The http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/2939187.stm BBC article is all about Jonah, as is the http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/13/1050172476306.html SMH article (via AFP) and he gets a passing mention in http://www.herald.co.zw/meet-the-mungoshi-dynasty/ The Herald article about his family.Possible  issues, but getting close to GNG.  If kept, it needs massive pruning of all the self-promotion. However, the Herald article notes that the Mungoshi family is a fairly notable dynasty.  Is there perhaps scope for merging this into a Mungoshi family article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: This is an  which doesn't really make any claim of notability strong enough to justify overlooking the |conflict of interest issue. And furthermore, the subject also self-created a whole bunch of |non-defining "keyword" categories ("African team building facilitators"? "Zimbabwean success coaches"?) that exist only to contain him because there's no extended category tree to parent them — which makes it even more clear that the intent here was |advertorial rather than encyclopedic. There might in fact be more legitimate grounds for an article, per BrownHairedGirl above, but  pertains — even if a proper article ''can'' be written neutrally and independently by somebody ''other'' than the subject himself, we're still better off starting from scratch than we are trying to fix ''this'' as written
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTOBIO||WP:COI||WP:DEFINING||WP:NOTADVERT||WP:TNT)