Deletion of Calliflower (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nom. Excesive unsourced information and lack of coverage to establish notability. Many of the sources included in the article do not mention the company. The Forbes or CNET articles for example. The WSJ is a broken link. Only two  CBS News and financial post seem to be valid and do contribute to its notability, but unless more can be found this by itself is not enough. If more sources are found the article should be neutralized
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)