Deletion of Errors in the United States Constitution

Comment: this is , not a singular and meaningful topic and not notable.  The question of whether there is a comma in the Takings Clause can, if reliable sources are found discussing the possible anomaly and its significance, be added to the article on the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  As noted above, however, the supposed BBC article is not a reliable source because it is not authored nor edited by the BBC, but is instead merely hosted on their website; the disclaimer at the bottom of that page makes that clear.http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A28880382  Everything else in this article is just a  added afterward (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Errors_in_the_United_States_Constitution&oldid=175321445 compare to original version) consisting only of unsourced and informal observations of historical shifts in the language, which has nothing to do with "errors" or typographical ambiguity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK)