Deletion of Victor Basa

Comment: as otability (people)|not notable. A 2006 |BLP, multiple tagged since 2010, that only has one source. It either has a ton of |original research or is improperly sourced through the "External links" section that is a dead link
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP||WP:OR)

Comment: Per , the article looks outdated & needs some clean up. The only source in the article is a dead link. Good thing I was able to get an http://web.archive.org/web/20061025055756/http://www.showbizpinoy.com/articles.php?do=article&articleid=2959 archived copy of it, which talks about his early TV career. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/lifestyle/familyandrelationships/715318/victor-basa-and-stephanie-dan-are-now-married/story/ This article talks about his recent marriage with Stephanie Dan. Part of https://www.cosmo.ph/entertainment/victor-basa-marries-girlfriend-stephanie-dan-a292-20191111 this article talks about part of his TV career. Basa also talked about https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/showbiz/content/333435/victor-basa-on-his-my-husband-s-lover-stint-i-was-able-to-flex-my-acting-muscles/story/ his stint in one of the TV shows. With the reliable sources indicated, the article is good enough to pass . My vote stands. I won't reply any further
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: as since the nomination there has been  with the addition of multiple references to a number of reliable sources such as Phillipine national newspapers that show significant coverage of the subject. It is now apparent that  and  are passed and deletion is no longer necessary, in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)