Deletion of Dahlgren Junction, Virginia

Comment: Despite claims that GNIS is not reliable, it's the official source in the United States for legally recognizing populated places. We have to rely on sources here as to what's a populated place and what isn't, not original research and speculation based on satellite imagery or other things. As such, it satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Please stop spewing utter nonsense, GNIS is ''not'' legal recognition, it is a context-free database of names that have appeared on maps ("This guideline specifically excludes maps and various tables from consideration when establishing topic notability, because these sources often establish little except the existence of the subject."), frequently misclassified as "populated places", and when accurate inconsistent with our guidelines. This very example is one of these misclassifications: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Virginia_Geographic_Names/aRAuAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=dahlgren+junction&pg=PA141&printsec=frontcover Virginia Geographic Names (the book version of the GNIS and more obviously "various tables") properly calls it a locale! The original research was mass-creating thousands of pages without finding corroborating and significant coverage for  and . This is a railroad junction, consistent with sources https://www.google.com/books/edition/Swedish_Place_Names_in_North_America/knt1AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=dahlgren+junction&dq=dahlgren+junction&printsec=frontcoverhttps://www.newspapers.com/clip/46322912/us-railroad-to-dahlgren-part-2/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/49025466/obituary-for-brakeman-louis-g-blunt/; no mentions calling it a community
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)