Deletion of List of songs recorded by Udit Narayan

Comment: A Sep 26, 2012 http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-09-26/news-and-interviews/34100527_1_huge-responsibility-artiste-sacrifices Times of India article on Lata Mangeshkar says, "After more than 65 years of singing you continue to be our national treasure. What summits remain for you to conquer?" Let's not make that summit the question of  on our site. We have :Category:Lists of songs by recording artists|249 Lists of songs by recording artists at the moment. A "national treasure" with a career of 65 years and numerous movie tracks, who has never, ever sung a "notable" song? Somebody has to be kidding
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS)

Comment: per Dr.Blofeld and Dwaipayan. Songs in Indian movies are indeed sometimes more important than the movies themselves. Also, this list clearly satisfies #2.  says ''In general, a "list of X" should only be created if X itself is a legitimate encyclopedic topic that already has its own article.'' which is clearly the case here. (Also note that listcruft is an essay, not a policy.) Per , ''Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject1 of multiple, non-trivial2 published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label.'' This means that most of the songs in the Lata list are probably notable (not having references does not make them non-notable, it just means the list needs work.) Also note per , ''If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion.'' which clearly applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:NSONG||WP:DELETE)