Deletion of J.E. Airhart

Comment: I don't know who Billy is. The wording of  is not as explicit as has been suggested with this case. The need to delete the article has not been established. The argument of 'not knowing, but not feeling generous' is logically fallacious. I'm assuming there is no quota for deletions and that this isn't an exercise in editorial muscle. I would find compelling an argument based on knowledge .. of the person or locale. My record will show that I don't merely oppose deletions, nor support them, no matter who posted them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: this type of figure is specifically & explicitly excluded by . Aside from the obituary, this article is completely unsourced, and there's nothing in the article to indicate any more notability than any other minor public figure in a minor area. Has someone taken a dislike to Billy today? That's the third one so far today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Per , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: Subject's entire claim to notability is being a county commissioner in a 15,000 person county.   quite explicitly excludes such local figures if they haven't received significant press coverage.  The article offers '''''no''''' press coverage for this individual.  Virtually the entire article is sourced by his and his wife's family-provided obituaries in the local newspaper.  No indication of notability, since anyone who's family wants an obit run can have an obit run in the ''Lubbock Avalanche-Journal''.  Nothing to reliably verify the claims in the article, since such obits aren't fact-checked.  The other listed "references" tell us nothing more than that the man existed and supported the Children's Home of Lubbock
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)