Deletion of Screen Media Films

Comment: Most of the article wording is a direct copy of the first paragraph of http://thecreativecoalition.org/2008/01/08/the-creative-coalition-and-screen-media-films-announce-spotlight-initiative-independent-films-making-a-difference/ this, so both a primary source and a ? Without that, the article would be little more than a "Selected films" list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (:WP:COPYVIO)

Comment: an unremarkable film distribution article; sources fail . The copy is highly promotional and also appears to be a copyvia. It's a "delete" all around for me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails GNG and . No indications of notability. Notability is not inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Per HighKing, article subject does not inherit () notability from other companies' films
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: I agree the article has more references, there are still no indications of notability. The references are a series of run-of-the-mill business deals, with no depth of coverage of the actual company. These references fail . It doesn't matter if they "pick up the exclusive rights for" the biggest movie on the planet since notability is not inheritied. The article still fails  and the list of products ... sorry movies ... is the same as any other company's catalogue of products and fails since it is promotional. In order for this company to meet the requirements to pass GNG is for two references that, in turn, meet the requirements for establishing notabilty - two references that don't rely on company sources or announcements of new "products", containing in-depth information about the company. This is still clearly a Delete unless some of the Keep !voters can point to some references
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SPIP)

Comment: I have re-worked the article and added some new references. Pinging {{U|Bearcat}}, {{U|SamHolt6}}, {{U|HighKing}}, {{U|Rathfelder}} to Have a second look. The article subject now passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)