Deletion of Trudi Ames

Comment: The notability test for an actress hinges less on how you parse the meaning of the word "significant", and more on how you ''reference'' the significance of the roles — the test is not the having of roles in and of itself, but the depth of |reliable source coverage that can or cannot be shown to get her over  ''for'' the having of roles. (For instance, a person can get over the bar for a minor supporting role, if it got them an Oscar nomination or made them verifiably and sourceably famous — and a person can be the main star of a film and ''not'' get over the bar if the film sucked and nobody went to see it.) But the only references here at all are a glancing namecheck of her existence in an obituary of her father, and her own |self-written contributor profiles in the back matter of two books she contributed writing to. Which means none of them support her notability at all, because the one that's independent of her isn't ''about'' her and the ones that are about her aren't independent of her, and no role, "significant" or not, is "inherently" notable enough to exempt an actress from having to be referenced better than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SELFPUB)

Comment: I added two additional sources from newspapers in the 1960s. Based on the current sourcing, the article passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: quite well referenced, passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)