Deletion of Hanan Mohamed Abdelrahman

Comment: Clearly obeys  #C2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: It's not the slightest bit "clear" that she passes #C2 - there have been discussions on the  talk proposing changes that probably would have made it the case, but at present it doesn't say so at all.  The gng author line is probably more promising, but I'm afraid I'm not convinced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as article creator. Possibly speedy keep, because of the falsified and invalid deletion rationale. In what sense are an interview with a different mathematician published by two major mathematical societies (which includes brief but nontrivial coverage of her teaching philosophy) and an article in the major newspaper of its nation (selected from among many many other newspaper articles on the same topic) not independent? In fact, four of the six footnoted references of the article are neither associated with the award nor "not about her". And I would argue that as the winner of her nation's top mathematics education award she clearly passes #C2, that as the subject of stories in multiple newspapers (not just the ones I cited) she clearly passes , and that the other more incidental coverage I included in the article on her book, her web site, and her participation in national education initiatives gives her a pass of . I note that this article was taken straight to AfD more or less immediately after it was created. What is it about articles on prize-winning and accomplished young women that acts as such an AfD magnet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: clearly meets #C2, Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Passes #C2 and the GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)