Deletion of Nemerle

Comment: just cos it makes a change ;) - no, but seriously, as Christopher has calmly pointed out over and over again (you must have the patience of a saint!), there are no |reliable sources to prove |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Not at all convincing. Your rsdn.ru links seem to be a tutorial. Your news.google.com link references sources talking about Mono or F#, with passing mentions to Nemerle. Mono is notable, but notability is not inheritable per . I'm not sure how "included in several Linux distributions" and "not even an academic language" are arguments in favor for this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)

Comment: While well noticed by those with connection to the subject and a small population of enthusiastic fans (who seem to have !voted early and often here), the Nemerle topic has not been noticed to a significant degree by independent sources. The reliable source material I found on Nemerle is: March 16, 2004: "US computer software giant Microsoft awarded Polish students from the IT Institute of Wroclaw University a research grant worth EUR 25,000. The students will work on the creation of the new programming language '''Nemerle'''." and October 2, 2007 "Applications created for .net can be modified and run on Linux, Windows, Solaris and other versions of Unix, and Mac OS X. Supported languages include C#, Java, Boo, '''Nemerle''', Visual Basic.NET, Python, JavaScript, Oberon, PHP and Object Pascal. Mono also supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, Firebird, Sybase ASE, IBM DB2, SQLite, SQL Server and Oracle." That is not enought reliable source material from which to maintain a stand alone article. Delete as failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I simply don't see enough coverage in reliable sources.  You can't win by creating tons of |single-purpose accounts and voting "keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: RSDN Magazine sources are enough to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: StackOverflow is not a measure of a language's notability. Specifically, from , self-published sources are generally unreliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE)

Comment: the subject of the article does not have significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  includes this: "The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it – ''without'' incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter." Further, it may well be the case that Nemerle is a programming language of huge potential, as a number of commenters above have suggested, that will someday be recognised by such coverage. However, it is not the purpose of Wikipedia to predict that, nor is it the purpose of Wikipedia to promote Nemerle (or any other programming language) so that more people find out about it (however noble a cause that may be), as has been suggested by at least one commenter above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)