Deletion of Jaclyn Miles

Comment: Sources fail to meet the requirements for ; being Miss Canada also is not an instant claim to notability as John pointed out earlier. Perhaps I can be the first delete voter that isn't met with a |big ol' mallet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INDEPTH||WP:BLUDGEON)

Comment: Meets . Known for different activities. I strongly disagree with the previous opinions that she is only known for being Miss Canada or that the fact that her organization is not notable in its own right is an impediment on the personal notability. Sourcing is good and relevant. It still contributes exactly the opposite way. The one weakness that I do  see and want to point out is that all coverage is in a span of 3 years
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The "significant article" reference provided by gidonb above fails  as the vast majority of the article is a word-for-word interview with the subject and is a PRIMARY source. No indications of any substantive independent articles from secondary sources. Overall, topic fails criteria for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: nbsp; Canada is a nation of 35,000,000; and the article has multiple sources, including some from England.&nbsp; Nomination does not appear to be aware of WP:BEFORE, eletion policy#CONTENT, , , and , but the nominator should by now be well aware that if he believes that this topic is non-notable, deletion is not a policy-based option.&nbsp; So what does he believe?&nbsp; Why are we here?&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:INSIGNIFICANCE||WP:ATD||WP:IGNORINGATD)