Deletion of Stuart Madnick

Comment: Nominators should follow  before nominating an article for AfD, otherwise the time of other editors may be wasted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: by an admin, please) - this looks like a case of .  Given his position he's presumptively notable under , and if there's still a lack of sourcing I'll just go ahead and add one so the original complaint is moot
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:PROF)

Comment: Clear pass of  #1, #4, and (most obviously) #5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: If I have counted correctly the subject has an h index of 29; a clear keep on rof #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: You've got to be kidding: a named chair at MIT, no less, and highly cited (per Xxanthippe). Meets  twice over
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)