Deletion of IZArc

Comment: In this current form, the article should be deleted because it does not meet  and it serves more as a  article. If editors can show me |non-trivial coverage or reviews of |reliable and independent secondary sources (not here, but in the article) to show that the article is |verifiable, I'll change my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:SPAM||WP:SOURCES||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: If this article meets Wikipedia's  guidelines then most articles about products or services in Wikipedia would meet those guidelines.  The problem , to me at least, is that some of the most vocal Wikipedia editors aren't native English speakers or don't have the reading comprehension necessary to accurately interpret Wikipedia's guidelines.  I think this article passes the notability test
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: Let's stick to WP guidelines to write articles here, okay? There states  with refer to |reliable sources. Prove it in the article, then I'll change my opinion. Saying millions of Google hits does not prove .  Oh, and it'd be very interesting to hear you asking car retailers about  guidelines of a car when you buy it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOTE)

Comment: one last thing. Don't compare with other articles.  doesn't apply here. They are all subjected to AfD if meets the criteria. We only discuss this article in this debate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)