Deletion of GMO conspiracy theories

Comment: per all of the above. These conspiracy theories really do exist, and the deletion argument is largely a matter of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: GMOs are a polarising topic. Like other similarly controversial subjects there is criticism that is justified (environmental concerns and IP issues) and then false information that can only be described as a conspiracy theory (deliberate attempts to poison the world). An article that examines the more out there claims is valid. Personally I would like to see this in the larger context of GMO activism, which is a more nuanced and interesting (to me) topic, but there is no eadline and there is not much wrong with the article as is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)

Comment: This more or less is intended to behave the same as Climate change controversy and climate change conspiracy theory (not a  argument, but an example of how fringe topics need to be handled sometimes) so a redirect isn't really appropriate. The controversies article handles the general controversy and how sources like the scientific literature address those, etc. The notable but pure quackery ( is at play here) is what goes into this article because it would be undue weight in the controversies article even though the content and idea of conspiracy theories in this topic is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE||WP:NFRINGE)

Comment: Just a note that the same nominator has also created another article in what appears to be in opposition to this  keep, which is also nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Monsanto_public_relations_activities. Those who have commented on POV issues with the conspiracy theory article being nominated may also find that deletion discussion of interest
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)