Deletion of Climb Online (2nd nomination)

Comment: At the point of the previous Afd at the end of January, the website had not yet been converted from concerning climbing to that of the SEO firm, so I suppose the previous argument doesn't stand. However, what is noted with the Keep opinion above is some coverage relating specifically to the winning of a reality TV show in December 2014 - which can be discounted as |notability is not inherited into that of a subsequent company venture. (All of that is best placed with :The Apprentice (UK series ten), if at all.) The article itself is referenced to one subsequent online posting by the company founder () and an online interview with the same person, about his life since winning the contest. What I am not finding is |reliable in depth coverage of the firm itself, as is required for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||:WP:PRIMARY||:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH)