Deletion of Peter J. King

Comment: Needs some expanding to show the impact of philosophy work - between the website and writings but I see this as a borderline keep because it has gaps and the writing could be better. I don't fault those who are unaware it's better to overref and bludgeon the reader with the obvious in the lede - these are then roblems to be fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per  and otability (persons). He is a respected http://human-nature.com/nibbs/04/king.html reviewer. He has a notability that can be searched.  http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=39995&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html Unesco.com, http://www.experiencefestival.com/peter_j_king_-_academic_career Experiencefestival.com
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: He's a stipendiary lecturer at Pembroke Collegehttp://www.pmb.ox.ac.uk/Fellows_Staff/index.php?profile=139, i.e. he's not a college fellow, and he's listed on the staff list of the philosophy department under "Researchers, Temporary Lecturers and College Fellows" http://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/the_faculty/faculty_members, below the 70+ "Senior Staff" and the 20 "Permanent and/or Senior Postholders in other Faculties, Colleges etc". This implies he's paid by the college (not the university) to give college tutorials (not university lectures) and doesn't have an office in the philosophy faculty building. I see no sign he fulfils any of the nine criteria at . If his one book is notable (not that i'm sure it is), there could be an article on the book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:TEACH)

Comment: does not meet  or any other standard. His work is not widely cited (figures on GS are single-digit).  Association with Oxford colleges is casual, and in any event |notability is not inherited.  I'm hoping to see a higher-quality decision on this AfD, in comparison to some of the "no consensus" decisions we sometimes get when there are several keep votes: in this instance, as I see it not a single keep vote here gives an argument that is both (1) true and (2) relevant to  or some other standard of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:PROF||WP:N)