Deletion of PAMI Young Researcher Award

Comment: to Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition#Awards. Just going by . Take away the IEEE references, and nothing is left as a reliable source. While I understand the allowances made for notability of people in  fields, I'm not sure how much leeway should be given to awards in academic fields. If you set aside normal standards of notability, I don't see a way of objectively judging any of the IEEE's machine vision awards; they all seem to depend on the IEEE saying how prestigious they are, with virtually no neutral sources saying anything about them, other than in massing
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: I tend to agree with {{user|DGG}}, insofar as the following:  "Career achievement" awards by learned societies to elder scientists who have had successful careers are themselves inherently notable, and help confirm notability of the awardees per .  They also provide Wikipedia with a list of subjects to ensure are stubbed.  The issue with "young researcher" awards is that many of the recipients aren't notable.  A proportion will go onto successful careers, but a proportion won't
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)