Deletion of Namloyak

Comment: article is stuffed with PRIMARY sourcing and stuff form inside his particular activist bubble, but searches (using Latin alphabet spelling of name; did not search in other writing systems) of news, books, scholarly articles fail to turn up , despite unique name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The article doesn't make a reasonable claim to notability. There are Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanka prose|a lot of pseudo-noteworthy poets in all languages, and the "major publications" don't look all that major: {{tq|''Tibet’s first collection of poetry in prison''}} might be noteworthy if it were sourced, but honestly it reads like an arbitrary criterion created to artificially make it "the first". No mention of him having received any major awards or the like. Most of the broken-link sources look like interviews, which are useless for GNG, and honestly when popular media in countries with geopolitical disputes with China (or even with sizable numbers of sinophobic racists) interview people who may be loosely associated with the Tibetan Government in Exile, that's |arguably even worse than |them just being interviews. Additionally, the article's being structured like a resumé is very suspect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:POVFORK)