Deletion of Myra (film)

Comment: Faikls 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: without prejudice as the future project curently fails . If or when it begins principal filming AND gets coverage in reliable sources, then bring it back. Too soon... too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: Not only spamming, but a major  problem, as a look at the article's talk page makes clear. The impetus appears to be the promotion of the endeavor, not the dissemination of information on a subject whose notability is established. Surprised this is still open
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: All the sources link to people or organizations related to the production which means sources are not independent. I accept use of primary sources to a certain degree for facts reliable third party sources wouldn't cover like newspapers rarely covering people's birthdays, but if the film has any sort of impact, it should be covered by newspapers or magazines. To the creator: see . There's bound to be articles about other films that also need to be deleted, but have yet to be discovered. We can have articles about films that haven't yet been shot or released as long as independent reliable sources have discussed the production like what happened prior to the release of Birth (movie) about the supposed nude scene. (sorry can't think of another example at the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE)