Deletion of Jaume Cañellas Galindo (3rd nomination)

Comment: Cañellas Galindo does have some notability, but not nearly enough to pass the strict  guidelines here on Wikipedia. Of the sources given, only a few are actually usable in any context and even then they'd pretty much only be able to be used as trivial sources. The rest of the sources aren't usable, such as the brief name drops and the primary sources. It's pretty obvious that if this page is deleted it'll be re-added by one of the same people who have been sockpuppeting in the previous AfDs, so I think this needs to be salted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per the reasons laid out by the nominator and at the previous AfD discussion. The references are rife with primary sources, and those that might pass muster as extremely weak  are cursory mentions that do nothing to satisfy . The strawman and  arguments here obviously do not establish notability either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:VAGUEWAVE)