Deletion of Mass killings under Communist regimes (3rd nomination)

Comment: same as before. Arguments for deletion are nothing more but , another disruptive nomination same as all previous ones. The subject is thoroughly discussed in scientific literature, the article is neutral (especially considering it is discusses the deeds of the most inhuman regimes that have ever existed) and  accusation needs to be backed up with ''something'', it really isn't a blanket statement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: The  claims above are ''transparently'' baseless, since there is extensive scholarship on the matter. The concept of Communist (more specifically Leninist, Stalinist, Maoist, etc.) nations perpetrating mass killings is hardly a new synthesis. As the article clearly shows, this concept is well established in several parts of the political, cultural, and scholarly mainstream:  there are international resolutions about it; there are an abundance of well-known books on the subject, it is widely taught in schools, and so on. Václav Havel is not a kook or a member of the fringe, after all. The fact that genocides and democides emerged from the Communist movement, a movement which was ''ostensibly'' on the Left and ''ostensibly'' aimed at a classless internationalist society, is one of the big political stories of the early 20th century; it is central to the histories of those nations, of the Cold War, and especially the history of the Left. Wikipedia cannot exactly let it go unreported
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Tons of sources, and while you might not find the exact phrase that is the title of this article, there is a vast amount of scholarly work on the subject.  This seems like a case of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:STICK)

Comment: or, more preferably, '''''Strong'' Move w/ major rewrite'''), as a  blowing minority assertions Wikipedia:COATRACK#Fact_picking|beyond all reasonable proportion after conspicuously failing to meet the Wikipedia:FRINGE#Notability_versus_acceptance|burden of proof dictated for such contentious theories.  The article's other problems currently include  violations, , , and  which are detailed separately on the talk page Talk:Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes#details1|here and Talk:Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes#details2|here and Talk:Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes#details3|here and Talk:Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes#details4|here and Talk:Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes#details5|here and Talk:Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes#details6|here.  Per nom, the article serves as a POV coatrack, beginning at the very top of the article.  The title itself is POV -- conceivably though this can be fixed by moving the page and assigning an NPOV title, or by just deleting the  after merging its contents to other historical articles.  There has been NO evidence that academic consensus acknowledges any relationship between "mass killings" and "Communist regimes", yet the title strongly implies a link. If we start creating titles that make implications found only in minority views, then NASA and all of its moon landing hoaxes becomes legitimate.  Allowing pages like this encourages the creation of all manner of conspiratorial and ideological attack page s.  Per
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE||WP:SYN||WP:FRINGE||WP:COATRACK||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: No issues here at all which have not been raised in the innumerable past attempts to delete.   The article is in better shape than in the past, and the overwhelming past results ought to be examined by any closing admin.   fails as a reason for deletion entirely.  Notable - undeniably.  Sourced - fully, Hence, clear Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: as a POV fork, , , and , redirecting to Genocide and distributing content between there and Communism.  &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: The topic is notable and it is only a few weeks since the previous AFD which was a Keep.  The nomination therefore seems to be disruption per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: The article takes well-known fact that the significant percentage of civilians in the peacetime years of the 20th century were killed in just a few countries, and in a classic  fashion labels these killings with an arbitrary common attribute of these countries (state ideology). The same countries can be grouped also by their state religion (atheism), or the major changes in government these countries were going through. It is very easy to find sources that would group the same killings (plus few extra ones) based on the two latter attributes. These sources, naturally, will be marginal, but ''so are the sources in the current article''. Therefore, if this article deserves a place in Wikipedia, its name might just as well be changed to "Mass killings by the atheist governments". After all, why group on one common attribute and not another
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)