Deletion of Na'Taki Osborne Jelks

Comment: I think  /  are the wrong guidelines to apply here, so this nom got off on the wrong foot. She got an award from the White House in 2014, two years prior to even getting her PhD. I believe she meets  as written based on the White House, NYTimes and People links, and should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON for  for this assistant professor (and Champions of Change doesn't seem relevant to that standard).  However, I think the People profile contributes strongly to notability (although we should be cautious of the fact-checking there, per the nom).  Together with the NYTimes mention and national award, it seems already enough for GNG.  Helping support is an interview in https://books.google.si/books?id=twaMDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA102&dq=%22Na%27Taki+Osborne+Jelks%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjGiP7q7JLqAhXx-yoKHUWVAYAQ6AEwAHoECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Na'Taki%20Osborne%20Jelks%22%20-wikipedia&f=false this book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: under  as there is some reliable independant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Definitely doesn't meet , but not sure yet if notable on other grounds, am learning towards weak delete though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)