Deletion of Magic Bullet (appliance)

Comment: WP:V|Unverified, |ad-like article of a |non-notable product
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:N)

Comment: Not relevant, reads like an ad and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per . It is the quintessential advertisement masquerading as an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: seems plenty of published, vetted reviews are in the wild and there is enough material to make an unbiased article. See these links:http://www.stuffmagazine.com/gear/product.aspx?id=677&area=32 http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/42759/product_review_magic_bullet.html http://www.lasplash.com/HomeAndGarden/printer_The_Magic_Bullet_Review_--_A_Time-Saver_and_Lifesaver.php. Article is also much more tolerable after a section was deleted. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I'm not seeing how this fails .  It's got the multiple, non-trivial sources that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)