Deletion of Daimonin (2nd nomination)

Comment: per the above. Should have been speedy deleted per #G4|G4
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: no improvement since the previous AfD. References: Wikipedia can't cite Wikipeia as a source. None of the remaining sources are at all |reliable. External links: The "shotgun" approach to indiscriminate linking, I see. Despite purporting to be reviews, these are no such thing, being merely directory entries on sites we would not link to anyway. These are all unnacceptable s
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPS)

Comment: Doesn't seem to have acquired any reliable sources since its previous deletion in 2007, just the same old entries on -failing anyone-can-submit-an-entry directory sites. If the games press haven't reviewed or written about it since 2007, it still doesn't merit a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)