Deletion of North Carolina Religious Coalition for Marriage Equality

Comment: Meets |notability guidelines. The WRAL link isn't trivial.  The N&O link has been replaced.  Additional sources - http://news14.com/charlotte-news-104-content/top_stories/?ArID=65572 "Religious leaders oppose marriage bill", News 14 Carolina; http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=FV&p_theme=fv&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=102A5E7B8DA24F9E&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM "Politics to pulpits", ''The Fayetteville Observer''; http://www.q-notes.com/1773/anti-gay-marriage-amendment-introduced/ "Anti-gay marriage amendment introduced" ''Q-Notes''; http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A21612 "The General Assembly Needs You", ''Independent Weekly''; http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A307224 "Legislative update: 'Defense of Marriage'", ''Independent Weekly''; http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=6676147 "Lawmakers want ban on gay marriage", WTVD; http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=6688190 "Hundreds gather in support of traditional marriage", WTVD; http://www.thedurhamnews.com/viewpoints/johnston/2006/story/2387.html "Worship, eat and ask the reverend", ''The News & Observer|The Durham News''; http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/journalnow/access/636904721.html?dids=636904721:636904721&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+13%2C+2004&author=David+Ingram+JOURNAL+RALEIGH+BUREAU&pub=Winston-Salem+Journal&desc=BILL+ACTS+TO+BRACE+LAW+ON+WEDLOCK+%3B+GOP+STATE+SENATOR+FILES+TO+AMEND+N.C.%27S+BAN+ON+GAY+UNIONS&pqatl=google "GOP State Senator Files to Amend N.C.'s Ban on Gay Unions", ''Winston-Salem Journal''; http://www.q-notes.com/top2007/top02_051907.html "Faith in America takes on the right", ''Q-Notes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails . Sources used are either passing mentions of event sposorship, or primarily about certain members or guest speakers of the group which fail . The WRAL source has one sentence mention the org in passing. I also cannot find any substantial coverage of the organization itself. While this org may make it self notable at some point, it does not meet the  at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)