Deletion of Rajagopal Kamath

Comment: basically per nom. Essentially zero citability in GScholar and WebOfScience, nothing else to indicate passing . Moreover, appears to be a possible  case, and the article reads as basically a  piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE||WP:OR)

Comment: fails  and . Also seems to be promotional material with a strong indication of . This sentence "He put forward the importance of neutrinos in understanding the fundamental concepts physics or understanding the shortcomings of Albert Einstein’s idea that nothing can travel faster than light and the superluminal velocities of light itself." is misleading, sounds like they are trying to claim they invented particle physics. Yes clear  and  concerns as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTH||WP:COI||WP:FRINGE||WP:OR)