Deletion of Lion’s Heart

Comment: Newbie page creator has demonstrated willingness to accept and apply feedback given by nominator. I'd be more concerned about possible conflicts of interest, some of the material added by page creator not being supported by given sources. Sufficient number of the sources themselves, however, meet  and demonstrate more than a local effort (California, Georgia, Connecticut
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS)

Comment: Looking at it again, the article does contain two references that are fairly impressive: major stories from a Los Angeles television station and from the main newspaper in Atlanta. In addition there is coverage from more local sources like the OC Register. So I believe this does meet . I encourage the author to keep adding to it but I think it should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I am unsure what changes have been made since the original nomination, but the references now show that the |organization has received significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.  The coverage is not just regional but national
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)