Deletion of Internet wrestling community (3rd nomination)

Comment: I don't think the IWC has any notability and is only a slang term anyway. The likes of Meltzer, Scherer and Keller are professional journalists and the remainder of the IWC is a motley bunch of fansite and discussion forum contributors, many of whom possess extremely inflated opinions of their own self worth (see notorious Wikipedia vandal and sock-puppeteer JB196 for a prime example). So the subject isn't worthy of an article and the article in existance is primarily 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Is complete  and has multiple other problems.—&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Per Theophilus75. Complete |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: While the Internet did certainly have an effect on pro wrestling and there's the possibility that an encyclopedic article could be written about it, this article isn't it and is also full of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: or '''Merge''' to List of professional wrestling slang.  It was my first attempt at an article in wikiland so I'll try one last fleeting attempt to keep it but do understand the arguments for delete.  I'll start with OR since that's the major case.  On  it gives 7 themes of OR so I'll take them one by one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)