Deletion of Safer Wholesale

Comment: Most sources in the article are not independent (company pages and press releases and the like) and the remainder are mere directory entries or other very passing mentions. None of them even start to establish |notability. A Google search found more of the same, plus reviews of Safer's '''merchandise''' that mention Safer itself only in passing. No relevant Google-news hits. No significant, much less in-depth, discussion by an independent source. Does not pass  nor . For an online merchant, I would expect online sources to exist, so the usual cavaet about possible off-line sources does not apply. Unless substantial new sources are addded, this should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: Non-notable company failing orp abd Special:Contributions/TheDailyFlows|created by a wp:SPA.  Trying to defend the page through  never helps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:OSE)

Comment: The nomination is admittedly poor grammar, I copied it verbatim from the contested |proposed deletion.  Additional (and perhaps this should be considered the primary) reason for nominating:  The references do not demonstrate that this company has received significant coverage independent of the company itself (i.e. it fails ) and I can't see any reason why it might pass  either, at least not given the text present as of //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Safer_Wholesale&oldid=585946821 the version dated
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion (WP:PROD||WP:GNG||WP:CORP)

Comment: Nothing that I see in that article supports any claim of notability in the article. No one denies that the company ''exists'', but that's not enough for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Google returns mostly self-generated content. As it stands, the subject fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: in regards to . I see very little sigcov. Aside from the new and now block editor's comments this has arguments towards a speedy or even snow deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Being listed on Alexa does not automatically make companies notable. Search results are largely repetitive, most of these being catalogues. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails ; sources do not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS)

Comment: people are citing  but are failing to describe exactly ''how'' it fails  with these sources and notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)