Deletion of Uchechukwu Deborah Ukeh

Comment: per  #3, as she has won a medal at several international tournaments which are the highest one in their country. If you don't like the criteria, this isn't the place to discuss it. She passes them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBADMINTON)

Comment: because she didn't meet . And analysis below;  has 5 points: point 1– {{tq|Participation at the Olympic Games, or World Championships}}; No, the subject only participated in "Open events" not "World Championship"; for their differences see Badminton World Federation. Point number 2 is closely tied to number 1 and also not met: reason; same rationale as no 1. {{tq|Points number, 5, 4 and 3 are all awards}}, this subject has none, as per as my several search shows. Any objection is welcome. Overall the article is stub, searches yielded poor result as their is no significant coverage of the subject, thus fails  ''&thinsp;&mdash;''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBADMINTON||WP:NBADMINTON||WP:GNG)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBADMINTON)

Comment: ping|Stvbastian}} First meeting GNG is '''not''' guarantee for Wikipedia article; because GNG only "presume" not automate; {{talkquote| From |GNG: "Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article}}. Now let's see whether the sources you provided have the significant coverage  to create an "assumption" of GNG first
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)