Deletion of Illinois Policy Institute

Comment: Satisfies  and . I think https://illinoistimes.com/article-7520-conservative-think-tank-to-illinois:-turn-right.html this article in the Illinois Times and https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/independent-city-watchdog-khans-secret-backer-right-wing-policy-group/ this article in the Chicago Sun Times some of the coverage of the organization that meets . This is significant, independent, reliable, secondary coverage in which any similar org should easily qualify. To answer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: There are news articles that are in-depth about the subject, are used in the article as citations, are intellectually independent of the subject, and therefore this helps meeting  as well as . "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." - 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG||WP:GNG)

Comment: The organization exists but that's not enough to prove notability. Lacks the significant coverage of the organization to meet . 1990sguy sources are about the governor appointing people connected to the IPI to positions on his staff.  That seems like passing mentions and  to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: The exisstance of the Illinois Policy Institute is not in doubt, nor is the fact that it is mentioned in independent sources.  There are two interrelated problems: One. the current article is a candidate for  due to its |NPOV content and tone. See Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Special note: advertising and promotion.  Second, once one strips away the advocay, the coverage does not meet the indepth coverage required for organizations.  See Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Significant coverage. The substantive articles are not about the Illinois Policy Institute, but about political issues in Illinois. An example is the https://web.archive.org/web/20150422052239/http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/illinois-policy-action-wins-pr-news-award-for-its-work-protecting-illinois-fair-flat-tax-300050040.html PR/Newswire article of March 12, 2015 (a ink rot|deadlink in the article) which in its five paragraphss devotes two to its awards, two to Illinois taxes and one to a brief and canned description of the basic facts about the IPC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NPOV||WP:L)

Comment: I'm actually quite surprised that this article has actually been nominated for deletion. Considering that the IPI has received a lot of coverage from independent and reliable sources, it clearly meets . If the article is written promotionally, we should rewrite the article rather than delete it. Of note, the IPI's relationship with Illinois governor Rauner could be expanded on (and has already given it much coverage in RSs: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2017-07-12/illinois-governor-signals-move-to-right-after-budget-defeat 1,http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-bruce-rauner-staff-changes-met-0712-20170711-story.html 2,https://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/12/bruce-rauner-fires-top-staffers-240460 3,https://wgntv.com/2017/07/15/gov-rauner-staff-shakeups-continue/ 4,http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-met-bruce-rauner-illinois-policy-institute-20180208-story.html 5,http://www.sj-r.com/news/20180208/gov-rauner-clashes-with-illinois-policy-institutes-tillman 6,http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/347778-illinois-governor-shakes-up-staff-after-controversial-white-male 7,https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/24/rauner-reshuffles-staff-after-response-to-racial-cartoon-242002 8), as well as the organization's relation to the recent ''Janus'' Supreme Court case (a relatively significant case): http://www.sj-r.com/news/20180723/mark-janus-leaving-state-job-joining-illinois-policy-institute 1,https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/janus-afscme-illinois-policy-institute-job-ruling-fair-share-union-dues/ 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: notability may be here, but  could also apply. I restored a more neutral version of the article. We definitely don't need this article and Liberty Justice Center, so if one of them ends up being kept, the other can be merged if applicable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Please post a link of some independent coverage please. Please read  to see the type of independent coverage that can be used to establish notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: I'm convinced that this article meets  based on the sources added here. They demonstrate that the subject is notable and influential enough to have it's own article. I have seen some other political articles kept with worse sourcing (this maybe deemed as OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but still true
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)