Deletion of Mock, California

Comment: No http://pbbooks.com/caindex.htm post office.  Newspapers.com was no help, "block" gets confused with "mock".  Time and time again, we have seen that GNIS is not sufficient to show notability for a location.  Mock was a https://carsoncolorado.com/historic-route/the-route/marble/ siding and https://quarriesandbeyond.org/states/ca/quarry_photo/ca-inyo_photos_3.html quarry.  Nothing more.  This locale does not meet  nor as it has no legal recognition nor does it have non-trivial coverage, it meets neither #1 nor #2 of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: per , "populated places without legal recognition are considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the GNG. Examples may include subdivisions, business parks, housing developments, informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods, etc.", this community has a GNIS tag as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)

Comment: per  if we want to have an article on something which purports to be a populated place, we need a reliable source which says it's a populated place. The burden of proof for showing this is on those who want to keep or retain the content. The GNIS is not a reliable source for this, there are many cases where it has said that something is a populated place when it isn't. There don't seem to be any better sources out there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)