Deletion of Public reactions to the Giffords assassination attempt

Comment: per |nom and also per .  This is just a random list of "I'm sorry too" and it isn't the first bit encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: The age of the article is irrelevant, but the scope, which is entirely inappropriate and unencyclopaedic. This unneeded fork from 2011 Tucson shooting‎ is developing into a horrendous breach of  and  of typical sound bites and sweet nothings a la: "''{{sic|Oh, aren't we all horrified by this atrocious tragedy and sad and unnecessary loss of life, may the per rot in hell}}''". As for the gun debate,  ''Plus ça change, Plus ça reste la même chose''. We have that ''ad nauseum'' every time there is a spree shooting - it doesn't belong in articles for each event, and should be centralised at Gun politics in the United States or somesuch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL||WP:QUOTEFARM)

Comment: as per . We don't need a list of reactions as it's already covered in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: sine I've already registered my notvote above.  Does the reaction to the event have a notability independent of the event itself?  Ironically, if this article were explicitly about the Palin brouhaha, it might actually be more encyclopedic, since a lot of that discussion became about Palin, rather than about the shooting itself.  Most of the rest of this is really just part of the shooting and should be split from the main article if and only if we decided to include longer coverage of everyone's |wailing and gnashing of teeth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: This falls squarely under .  The intent here seems to have been to preserve the buzzwords that come in statements from politicians after any tragedy-- "thoughts and prayers", "deeply saddened", senseless violence, etc.  That may be new to some, but after enough tragedies that defy words, one realizes that the same words are used again and again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)