Deletion of California Shuttle Bus

Comment: While not all references meet , in depth/significant coverage from the reliable sources Los Angeles Times would indicate that the subject can arguably pass . However, at the same time, the number of |hits are http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1990&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22California+Shuttle+Bus%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22California+Shuttle+Bus%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go very low, and only http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22California+Shuttle+Bus%22 two books mention the company specifically, both of which are passing mentions, therefore one can argue that the number of in depth articles are insufficient to meet the ''significant coverage'' criteria set forth in 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:GOOGLETEST||WP:GNG)