Deletion of EMBnet.journal

Comment: I've added a secondary ref from a reliable publisher in the field. The main question in my mind is whether EMBnet.journal is different enough from EMBnet.news to be considered a new journal. If so, this may be a case of  unless we can find another secondary source. If it isn't a new journal, then EMBnet.news does have a lot of history behind it and secondary sources such as http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/S6/S1 and http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/22487/InTech-Concepts_historical_milestones_and_the_central_place_of_bioinformatics_in_modern_biology_a_european_perspective.pdf; in this case, the article should be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The 3 apparent SPAs concern me greatly. Especially as all 3 have suddenly come out of the woodwork after months, or more, of not editing to vote here. The number of visits each year is not evidence for notability. A lot of these so-called "citing articles" don't, on the face of it, appear to have anything to do with this journal, and if they do, they're not all exactly . Also, I'm pretty sure that arguing the journal is notable for having notable editors fails , as does any links between EMBnet.news and EMBnet.journal. I have not, however, searched for sources myself, and as such, won't vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:INHERIT)

Comment: Thinking about it, EMBnet.journal is more than just a name change, the publishing model greatly changed as well, so it can't really be thought of as the same journal. EMBnet.journal is verifiable and has at least one secondary reference, as noted in my comment above. While it may fall below threshold for notability, it is a good candidate for merging to EMBnet. As a relatively new journal, this topic has ; anyone recommending delete rather than merge should justify why deletion is necessary, as merge is the preferred action for such topics
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL)