Deletion of List of coupled cousins

Comment: passes  Creating other lists as suggested by Treker is also a good idea. If this list focusses on notable persons, the list is worth keeping
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: per #14: {{tq|Any other content wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|not suitable for an encyclopedia}}. ikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and Wikipedia is . I agree with the nominator that this is not notable or helpful ''as a list''. This is pure . The leap from cousin marriage being a notable topic which is appropriate for an article to List of coupled cousins (which includes multiple instances of "sixth cousins once removed", one instance of "eighth cousin thrice removed", and one instance of "tenth cousin once removed") being appropriate is kind of like saying that because climate of London is a valid article, so is list of rainy days in London. Some people above have argued that it should be kept but changed to such an extent that it would basically be unrecognizable compared to its current form. To that I say that even if consensus determines that we should have some kind of heavily modified version of this list,  applies and it should still be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELREASON||WP:W||WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:TNT)