Deletion of Gus Sorola (2nd nomination)

Comment: I cannot find "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject...", which is required to meet the basic standard of notability under . Neither is there any evidence of a) significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; b) a large fan base or a significant "cult" following or c) unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment, which are required to establish notability under . I therefore support the nomination on the basis of lack of notability, as destined in WP policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: the references in the article now are from IMDb (not reliable) and 3 are from the Rooster Teeth website (just a primary source), oh and Youtube but I wouldn't hold notability on that. No significant coverage, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)