Deletion of Robert H. Richards IV

Comment: In this case I think Richards meets the requirements of  because of the discussion his light sentence spurred. There are lots of published (not just blogs) opinion pieces about it, including lawyers' comments http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/woman-sues-ex-husband-du-pont-heir-dodged-prison-raping-3-year-old-daughter-article-1.1740180http://www.freep.com/article/20140330/NEWS07/303300113/Du-Pont-heir-s-sentence-for-raping-daughter-3-raises-questionshttp://www.salon.com/2014/03/31/did_wealth_keep_a_child_molester_out_of_jail/http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2014/03/31/american-justice-for-the-wealthy-no-prison-for-du-pont-heir-convicted-of-sexually-molesting-his-child-because-he-would-not-fare-well-in-jail/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-judge-says-du-pont-heir-wont-fare-well-in-prison/http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/03/31/dupont_heir_roberts_h_richards_iv_gets_probation_for_raping_his_daughter.htmlhttp://www.delawareonline.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/03/31/real-questions-richards-case/7135945/. I would also accept the article being renamed to something like "Trial of Robert H. Richards" in line with Trial of Michael Jackson etc. although I don't feel strongly either way on the name
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: This article makes no effort to cover his life story, solely focusing on his trial, and would easily fall under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)