Deletion of June 2010 West Bank shooting (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and User:nableezy above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: 10 of the 11 sources used in this article are news stories from the day of the event. The other source focuses on another similar event a month later and mentions this shooting in passing. This is a news story, and as Wikipedia is |not the news this does not belong on Wikipedia. Countless news stories can be used as sources for countless news events, that does not make those news events worthy of inclusion as a stand-alone article on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per , unless we are going to have separate articles on every Palestinian attack, and every Israeli retaliation, from the last 10 years or more - not to mention an article for Drone attacks in Pakistan|every U.S. drone strike in Pakistan, List of suicide bombings in Iraq in 2004|every suicide bombing in Iraq, and so on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and Jclemens
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: nothing more then a news story: 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: as per the  policy, no indication of any lasting "enduring Wikipedia:Notability|notability", may be worth listing in list of terrorist attacks in 2010 but absent some |reliable independent significant coverage outside just reporting on the attack then it's place is in wikinews not here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RS)

Comment: per  as an event with persisting widespread coverage in reliable, independent sources. Here are a few such sources from the three months since the event to start off with: http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/shin-bet-we-ve-caught-hamas-cell-behind-murder-of-israeli-policeman-1.302793, http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/shin-bet-arrests-hamas-men-implicated-in-cop-s-murder-1.302889, http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/07/19/Arrests-in-Israeli-police-officer-killing/UPI-82731279582121/, http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/insideisrael/2010/July/Shin-Bet-Nabs-Hamas-Terror-Cell/, http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/HRW/95f64308a3e514b7f1dccedad8dc451e.htm. The article shouldn't be deleted until a couple of simple questions are answered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: fails  as far as I can tell - "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) - whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time - are usually '''not notable''' unless something further gives them additional enduring significance." I can't see ant indication of this having "enduring significance" from reading the article. Some !keeps have suggested because it received international coverage it is notable per , this is not the case it says they are "very likely to be notable" if they have "widespread (national or international) '''impact'''" - impact is not the same as coverage and no mention of an international impact is mentioned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: as |Wikipedia is not the news. There is no evidence of lasting impact. Every source is within one week of the incident except one, where is only a passing mention. It may be newsworthy, but not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . This is an event of a national scope with lasting effects.  is a prohibition against ''routine'' coverage, and this is not routine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per JClemens and the editors he cites. Guidelines like WP:EVENT represent the community consensus as to how the often-mentioned  policy is to be applied. To read the two as being in conflict is to reject the established community consensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . Special:Contributions/124.207.81.2|124.207.81.2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)