Deletion of Joey Branning

Comment: I think as the article stands it passes , and follows guidelines set out at  and . It does need a copyedit and some of the original sources added in place of the Digital Spy ones
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FICT||WP:SOAPS)

Comment: Passes ; notable soap opera and fictional character
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Much as I dislike these massive soap character biographies, it is Something We Do, for many of the high impact series. Yes, , but outside a change in general conventions - which is not a fight we are going to win - these hundreds (thousands?) of large articles aren't going away; and I don't see grounds for deleting this particular one, which is comparable in content and quality to the usual fare of this type (e.g., those on List of Friends and Joey characters and whatnot). Shelve with 3rd league Romanian footballers and hope for a sea change
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: or redirect to a suitable list article. Once again folks are confusing popularity or in-universe notability with real world notability. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)