Deletion of Greyson Michael Chance

Comment: In general, when it comes to people notable only for one event, as appears to be the case, the important policy here is  and the guideline .  states: "hat Wikipedia is not#NEWS|Wikipedia is not news, or an indiscriminate collection of information. Merely being in the news does not imply someone should be the subject of Wikipedia article. If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them." I'm glad the kid got his 15 minutes of fame, but it does seem like a Media circus, and I think it'll fade into background noise in a short time. :) Just my thoughts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:BLP1E||WP:W)

Comment: I don't think he passes , as the coverage seems to be all about |one event at this point. However, I'd bet that very soon he will be notable and receive press coverage for something other than his Youtube video
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I signed for you: you can sign by typing four "tildes" after your post, like this: "~~~~") Even if the hype over the article's subject ''does'' die down, that wouldn't necessarily be a valid reason for the article to be deleted. If the editors here, yourself included, can demonstrate that Greyson is |notable then it's quite likely the article will be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per ,  and . The subject is currently notable solely for his performance on YouTube, a performance which ''has'' gained him some international coverage - but purely for that one event (YouTube performance). '''My preference would be for this article to be merged into List of YouTube personalities, and this article recreated if/when the subject releases something.''' Assuming that the subject will eventually meet our |notability requirements is inconsistent with  (and the onus is on those proposing future fame to |provide verification...), and regrettably I can see plenty of policy reasons to delete/merge/redirect, and only enthusiasm as a reason to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SINGLEEVENT||WP:BLP1E||WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:V)

Comment: per the news articles indicating |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)