Deletion of Temple Anshe Amunim (Pittsfield, Massachusetts) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Obviously a 147-year-old temple is notable. I have added |reliable sources to back up most information. The temple links were all non-working for me, so I deleted the bit of information credited to them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: can pass  guidelines now, based on the addition of references to independent reliable sources after it was nominated for AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: For me, it isn't about what one user said or neglected to say - it's about the question at hand, i.e. notability. Once notable, notability doesn't go away, ever. Therefore, for this institution not to be notable, we'd have to assume it did not receive any reliable coverage throughout its 148 years of serving the community. The other alternative is that the reliable coverage is difficult to source due to the fact that the internet has been around for a very short period of time comparing to this long history. While the former might be true, the latter is much more likely, and I'd give it the benefit of the doubt and a few more years until someone spends the necessary time in the dark cellars of the MA archives to scan century old documents. Unsourced material has to be removed immediately only if it's contentious BLP material (). The rest is left for the common sense of the editors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION)