Deletion of Purification (film)

Comment: John Basedow is at AfD (and the disruptive er reported at  blocked). That leaves this as a borderline GNG orphan with little chance of improvement
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN||WP:COIN)

Comment: While not the same far-reaching notability of a big studio's blockbuster, I find http://bloody-disgusting.com/news/28240/underworld-rises-in-sci-fi-horror-purification/ ''Bloody-Disgusting'', http://web.archive.org/web/20120415205631/http://technorati.com/entertainment/film/article/purification-a-film-a-game-changer ''Technorati (page 1)'', http://web.archive.org/web/20120418052528/http://technorati.com/entertainment/film/article/purification-a-film-a-game-changer/page-2/ ''Technorati (page 2)'', http://www.aintitcool.com/node/54769#5 ''Aint It Cool News'' and http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/30606/unclean-souls-beware-the-purification/ ''Dread Central'' and https://emmreport.com/production-set-for-dark-hospital-film-acedia/ ''EMM Report'' enough to show that  is met... even if ''just'' barely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)