Deletion of Paul Townsend

Comment: on basis (at least) of cites and FRS. Nominations as inappropriate as this one waste the time of editors. Did the nominator do 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: FRS, very high citability, more than enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The FRS saves us from any work digging for more debatable evidence of notability; it's a clear pass of  #3. But if we do dig, there's plenty more: his paper ''Unity of superstring dualities'' has over 1000 citations in Google scholar, and http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author%3Apk-townsend even his tenth most cited has over 300; that's a clear pass of #1, as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)