Deletion of Alternative theories of quantum evolution

Comment: As per nom and above, completely fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: When a  topic uses the same label as a  topic, it is important that Wikipedia identify some  notice of the topic. As far as I can tell, with the exception of one preprint, the only people talking about this are those who either have an extreme vested interest in the idea (its progenitors), or those who like to connect quantum mechanics to literally anything (quantum mysticism). Either way, this does not provide for a  justification for this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:MAINSTREAM||WP:FRIND||WP:NFRINGE)

Comment: I looked for additional coverage during the move-request discussion and found nothing that was reliable and independent. I think the rebuttal mentioned in the nomination is scientifically correct, perhaps even a little overly generous, but one book review that wasn't even formally published is not |sufficient basis to say that an article should exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)