Deletion of Farshid Delshad (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fail . Lack of significant secondary source coverage independent of the subject himself. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: and some questions; this article reads like a resume, telling readers what Delshad has accomplished, there appears to be no referenced analysis of his work, nor references showing the impact of his work in the area of linquistics.  He has been a lecturer, not notable, has written a thesis, not notable, has obtained additional linguistic training, not notable, is a scholar, not in itself notable, and a translator, not notable, and has written a number of books, not notable.  Where are the reviews of these books that tell the reader the impact they have made in Delshad's field? has he won any notable awards? As the article presently reads he does not appear to have made "a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". The references in the article only tell readers what he has done and written. I know notability doesn't apply to article content  and , but I hope that those editors who believe this article should be kept can provide some useable citations
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NNC||WP:CONTN)