Deletion of Ronn Torossian (2nd nomination)

Comment: As obnoxious as his minions are, and despite the article formerly being a glorified promo for him and the company, he has been the subject of features in NYT and Businessweek. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: the profile in the New York Times along with the other |reliable sourcing should be enough to provide information for a |verifiable |stub at the least, there is a definite case for |merging into 5W Public Relations but ultimately that's an editorial decision
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:STUB||WP:MERGE)

Comment: This is an individual who has been profiled at length in ''The New York Times'' and ''Business Week'' -- among many other publications -- in articles that cover Torossian individually and in gory detail. Without any doubt whatsoever he meets  and any other standard of notability one could ever conjure. The first AfD for Torossian was a rather bizarre affair, with an AfD created by an apparent sockpuppet and a number of participants, virulently opposed to Torossian, who advocated for deletion and have had no other involvement in Wikipedia other than related to that AfD. I'm not sure what happened to this article in the past year or so, but the current article is little more than a stub. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ronn_Torossian&oldid=173434578 This version from the close of the first AfD in November 2007 provides a much more comprehensive biography, supported by reliable and verifiable sources. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ronn_Torossian&oldid=225783677 This version from mid-July 2008 represents the peak in size for the article, and there is plenty of worthwhile material that has just been hacked out and no longer appears in the current version. I'm not sure why the Torossian article has been targeted for deletion, either before or this go around, but there can be no possible doubt that he is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Subject might be notable, but the article currently does not establish notability according to  or general 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:BIO)