Deletion of Seydibesir POW Camp

Comment: both Seydibesir Event for lack of erifiability|verifiability and Seydibesir POW Camp because the present article is not about the camp, and it is better to start over () with an article at the camp's acknowledged name, Sidi Bishr, as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:TNT)

Comment: both - at best these articles seem to refer to a myth that seems to have built up over time which was the probably the result of a far smaller number of prisoners going blind due to a vitamin deficiency caused by a poor diet (see for instance Yucel Yanikdag (2013) ''Healing the Nation: Prisoners of War, Medicine and Nationalism in Turkey, 1914-1939'', p. 160 https://books.google.com.au/books?id=bD-rBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA161&lpg=PA161&dq=15,000+turkish+prisoners+blinded&source=bl&ots=0Laa-GY0VY&sig=2a30YoHeoMWJ6hgNwve-IQA6k7A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBmoVChMInIrI8MuRyAIVh4-UCh12uQV7#v=onepage&q=15%2C000%20turkish%20prisoners%20blinded&f=false published by Edinburgh University so meets the req's of  as far as I can tell). There appears to be some coverage of this topic (i.e. the myth) in Google Books (although I couldn't read the sources so cannot verify the content). Given this I am tempted to say the "myth" itself *might* be notable; however, the manner in which these articles deal with it is entirely different, being the unsourced  version presented without context. Quite simply unless someone is able to rewrite these really quickly I think they do indeed need to be |blown up lest Wikipedia further assist the spread of yet another hoax / myth. I've tagged both as disputed for now to alert readers at least
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FRINGE||WP:TNT)

Comment: unless  can be provided.  I have no doubt that following the campaign in Palestine, the British had a lot of POWs and it may be that a few went blind while imprisoned.  I suspect that this is a story that has been greatly exaggerated, if not a plain HOAX.  While this was the period before the Geneva Conventions, the British were used to keeping POWs in camps.  This happened with captured Germans.  I therefore doubt that the British would be incapable of dealing with their Turkish WWI prisoners.  I suspect that this is an invented story to use to counter issues about the Armenian genocide.  That was wrong, but perhaps capable of justification in Turkish eyes on the basis that their Christian subjects were potential traitors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)