Deletion of Pound for pound

Comment: I do not believe that ''pound for pound'' as a topic is appropriate for Wikipedia since #DICT|Wikipedia is not a dictionary and I don't see any encyclopedic that might be added beyond the definition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Outside of the dictionary definition, the usage of the term in some other way would need  about the usage of the term, not simply referencing others using the term or  on how the term is being used by various sources. None of the sources provided, nor any found in a quick web/news search, are ABOUT the term. The HBO article almost comes close, but even if it did then it would be a single source of dubious reliability (written by an HBO staffer for their "inside HBO" desk). Ultimately, it is either DICDEF, or fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:GNG)

Comment: it was |sourceable before and |is now sourced.  Lots of phrases are both defined in Wiktionary and discussed as a topic or concept in Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:HEY)