Deletion of Rucka Rucka Ali

Comment: Has charted with his albums.  is meant to show notability in cases where  is disputed. If an artist must meet both, there is no point in any other notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:MUSICBIO indicates where a subject ''may'' be notable if they have been in the chart, however, I am not seeing how this subject meets  as he lacks significant coverage in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I added to the article a source with http://www.rhapsody.com/artist/rucka-rucka-ali a short biography from Rhapsody (online music service)|Rhapsody, which seems independent and reliable. I also added a BBC News http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10345282 online article about a minor controversy regarding his work, again, very clearly independent and reliable. I'm not claiming these on their own amount to , but they are just two mentions I found in the first two pages of the Google search, and I'm pretty convinced a thorough search will find more. I tend to treat  #2 as supporting evidence in case of ''multiple chartings'', when  cannot be directly shown, on the assumption that when an artist is charting multiple times they are bound to be covered, even if I cannot personally find it. Of course, everyone can evaluate for themselves
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: passes #2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)