Deletion of Killing of Yehoshua Weisbrod

Comment: as per |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per DoctorBob3. Shame that Huldra is basing this request on political mudslinging instead of offering any policy-based arguments. Clear example of  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST||WP:BATTLEGROUND)

Comment: Article meets |GNG because of international coverage at the time of this unusual incident; Because of widespread coverage of the political impact at the time; and because of coverage coming years later due to status of the killer vis a vis the Oslo Accords
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: Random act of violence with no lasting historical significance. , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: Notability is based on the rules discussed in  and other areas. In this case notability is established by |reliable sources discussing the killing as mentioned in the article including The New York Times. This has nothing to do with politics, just notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Killings of Israelis or Palestinians are, unfortunately, routine events. As such,  applies. I don't see any evidence that the victim here was notable for anything else than this one event, nor do I see any significant lasting impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)