Deletion of Augur (software)

Comment: Augur is notable per .  The list provided above by David alone is enough to meet all of the conditions: IBTimes, Fox News, Bloomberg, Fortune, MIT, Economist.  These all have one or more full length articles about Augur, are all considered realiable sources by Wikipedia standards, are all secondary sources, and are all independent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: quite notable in the crypto space and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: David Gerard dismisses https://fortune.com/2018/07/09/augur-coin-crypto-rep-vitalik-buterin/ this Fortune article as "churnalist fluff" but it is a full length article by a named journalist that is not a simple re-hash of company press releases so in any other context would be considered a reasonable source. Overall I think there is enough to justify an article. I also agree that  applies - it is only necessary to establish that it was notable, not that it remains active and profitable today
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)