Deletion of List of YouTubers (3rd nomination)

Comment: Regarding , zero reliable sources have been provided so far. Regarding , it can be used as an argument ''against'' deletion (according to LISTN), and that is why I mention it in my rationale
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: ndash; I am not fond of long lists of notable things that fall in the same category. I'm mostly staying neutral here because of an |other-stuff-exists-like argument: This well-sourced list of notable Youtubers is much shorter and higher quality than many, many other lists we have on Wikipedia. I would love to see a bit more prose about "youtuber" as a profession/practice, but even without it I see encyclopedic value in this list. The navigational value listed in  is at least there, as I can search for terms like "vlog" or "journalist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: obviously. Easily passes NLIST. No list "duplicates" a category (). No new arguments given beyond those offered when it's been ''kept five times in the past'' (including a snow keep last time). &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: The issue of |canvassing has been raised at AN/I-- Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Opinion_about_AfD_notification. Will try to update the perma link if needed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:canvas)

Comment: Not redundant with the category, per  and fulfills criteria for notability. I think the profession is also probably notable if you started an article for it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: As stated before and in , the fact that this list is closely tied to the category is perfectly fine and not a valid deletion reason.  is obviously satisfied; regardless of whether sources are present displaying notability of the set as a whole, they can easily be found with a search. The majority of entries on this list are for notable people who have engaged in this occupation and like any other occupation that this many notable people are employed in, a list is justified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:LISTN)

Comment: Reliable sources abound that not only discuss what a "YouTuber" is, but who various YouTubers are.  is met. Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates contain redundancies by design. –&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per reasons above (, ). Also, everyone on this list has an article page, and are notable enough to have one (or else their page would be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:NLIST)