Deletion of Alwyn Hamilton

Comment: both. I expanded ''Rebel of the Sands'' with sources (e.g., https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/10/books/review/ya-crossover.html New York Times, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/feb/20/rebel-of-the-sands-alwyn-hamilton-review-teenage-fiction The Guardian) to help show that it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)

Comment: what is all that | white fluffy stuff", now now coola:)), ''Rebel of the Sands'' meets , with multiple |reviews (in addition to those in the article, a lot more out there ie ''http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865675350/Book-review-Alwyn-Hamiltons-Traitor-to-the-Throne-even-better-than-its-predecessor.html Deseret News'', https://www.commonsensemedia.org/book-reviews/rebel-of-the-sands common sense media, ''https://muse.jhu.edu/article/612590 Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books'', ''http://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/rebel-sands New York Journal of Books'' ''https://kcls.bibliocommons.com/item/show/1584984082_rebel_of_the_sands School Library Journal, Booklist, The Horn Book, School Library Connection, VOYA Reviews'' phew! that will do:)) and being a NYT best seller, Hamilton meets , with this book https://www.worldcat.org/title/rebel-of-the-sands/oclc/973917974&referer=brief_results held by over 1000 libraries worldwide (not just Canada and USA but numerous other countries ie. UK, NZ, OZ, Holland) so it is "well known", and has had plenty of reviews
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:NBOOK||WP:RS||WP:NAUTHOR)