Deletion of Alientology

Comment: There are no |independent, reliable sources that cover the subject significantly enough, which means that it also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCES||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Just because an article refers to itself as a neologism doesn't mean that it warrants deletion as a neologism.  The guidelines on eologism establish this.  Some neologisms (in the sense of the common usage of the word) are notable enough to have articles.  In this case, I do find a New York Times article that references the term Alientology: http://movies.nytimes.com/mem/movies/review.html?res=9504EFD91F39F937A25751C1A964948260.  But I do not think this particular article is notable because I barely find any sources--and the coverage in that source I gave is rather trivial.  I say '''Delete''' but I want to caution users that I do not agree with all the reasoning/arguments presented above.  I agree with the reasoning that there aren't good sources--as many people have pointed out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)