Deletion of List of The Late Late Show with James Corden episodes

Comment: Episode lists are common on Wikipedia for popular shows. There are also book volume descriptions for comics and manga, and some of these are featured. Saying that episode lists are  is simply not true
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: per  and SIGCOV. A handful of individual talk show episodes may be notable, but that is by far the exception, rather than the rule. Daily episodes are far too numerous for such treatment. Show me where episodes are described in some detail anywhere outside of Wikipedia. There aren't any AFAIK, so there is no SIGCOV. There are a lot more such lists; even those during Johnny Carson's "reign" should go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTVGUIDE)

Comment: per  and . It's a notable show with many verifiable sources readily available in print for appropriate expansion. The content itself isn't full of fancruft. The list could be expanded to make it less of a directory design (i.e. providing a basic summary of each episode). Deleting the article isn't the answer for developing lists on notable topics with clear delimitation. I'm not seeing a good policy based argument for deletion here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: wikipedia IS NOT a fansite, TV guide or |indiscriminate collection of information. The guideline says articles should '''not''' exist purely for "summary-only descriptions of worksSummary-only descriptions of works", which is pretty much what these articles are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)