Deletion of Delvina Dahlheimer

Comment: I have seen no reference in  a |reliable source for the claim that the two are sisters-in-law. The only non-trivial reference for either of them is http://nc.startribune.com/blogs/kersten/?cat=3 this one on Catherine Hagel, which doesn't mention Delvina. It does say that her Hagel's father's name was Dahlheimer, but that coincidence of name is not evidence of a family connection, so I have tagged that fact as original research
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails , will never be more than a stub
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Under most circumstances, I'd agree this article should be deleted, however I wonder if  can come into effect here, as  clearly does not. Usually, a supercentarian is deleted as a sole holder of non-notability, however, in this case there are actually 2 holders of notability, in Catherine Hagel and her sister Delvina Dahlheimer. Her deceased sister was the oldest in Minnesota. Catherine now the 8th in the world, 5th in the United States, and 1st in Minnesota after beating her sisters' record. I would actually be okay with a double-Redirect to a secondary article such as ''The Dahlheimer Sisters'' where their notability as supercentarians is put together and perhaps expanded from there. --Special:Contributions/Enhanceddownloadbird|'''EnhancedDownloadBird
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTKNOWIT||WP:LOCALFAME)