Deletion of Jodense Valenciano (2nd nomination)

Comment: obvious exceptions for RS evidence of notability / unblock''). There was already a BLPPROD on the article, and this AFD would ordinarily extend this through to July 20. No evidence found to support claims of notability,  is close enough to applying, and  is possible. See Jodense_Valenciano_(Philippine_actor), Jodense_Valenciano_(actor), Jodense_Valenciano_(singer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:G5)

Comment: per nomination, since subject fails . The top hat with the list of article infractions looks larger than the article itself. Someone tried to serve this up many times before so |pass the salt, please
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:SALT)

Comment: I, too, cannot find any coverage at all. G4 does not apply unfortunately since there was no previous AFD deletion and the article is almost completely different. Same with G5, from the pages alone one cannot reasonably assume that the previous article was created by the same person, although it's likely. G11 does not apply since ''the text'' of the article is not overly promotional and G11 does not cover intent. That said,  deletion is entirely possible if consensus is evident before the seven day period is over. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)