Deletion of WebAPP

Comment: While noting the arguments detailed below, this article still appears to fail . And if this statement is correct, which I am happy to say is a decision for a more senior member of the community, argument is pointless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Ego has nothing to do with this.  Anything anyone says about this being personal is |bollocks.  This AfD and the PRODs that preceded it were intended to remove an article that appears to describe an otherwise non-notable website.  If the article's content and external links assert its notability (which is defined as several non-trivial, reliable published works sourced independently of the subject of the article) then it meets , and by extension,  and may stay.  As
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:N||WP:WEB)

Comment: per , and lacks |sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS)

Comment: As the articles' nominator for deletion (and as one not involved in the subject at all until I added a speedy tag to one version earlier this week), all I can say is that, despite the lengthy defense of the subject, no one has done the simple thing, if it is possible, and added references from |reliable sources that help establish its |notability, which would in turn help one of the two meet  (with the other, presumably, then being turned into a redirect).  In other AfDs in which I have been involved, this is often a sign that such sources are not available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:WEB)