Deletion of 2008 Summer Olympics highlights

Comment: per . This nomination achieves nothing but to make Wikipedia a laughingstock to the general public
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: I would like to point out that the vast majority of the editors who wish to keep this article are relying on the  argument and or otherwise  argument, neither are valid rationales for keeping an article under AfD. #NEWS would be a good rationale for deleting this. Also, the article's premise is fatally flawed by its |subjectivity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per nomination. I appeal to all other editors to support this because all it serves to do is further stratify the information of the Games. There is some information not found elsewhere but it is mainly trivial. No one has defined "highlight", which confirms my belief that it's violating  (Isn't a gold medal a highlight? - which really negates its use, see List of 2008 Summer Olympics medal winners). Editors here are deciding what takes precedence, not the reader
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Its sourced, its notable, and the article can go into more detail than the main 2008 Olympics article can, which keeps it from being redundant. As an aside, I think its getting |snowy in here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: If "highlight" is the issue, then why is this not a move request? The "policy based reason" is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and this page presents content in a reader-friendly format not otherwise found on the site. People seem to think that this page consists of editors adding "My cousin Tony thinks archery is lame", when the page is a strictly sourced summary mainly consisting of broken world records, national firsts, and gold medal tables, with about as little color commentary as can be imagined. If a reader wants to know, "What records were broken in the 2008 Summer Olympics?", "Were there any countries who won gold after Olympic droughts?" or even "I don't recall what happened during the 2008 Summer Olympics. I wonder if Wikipedia has a page that can summarize the sporting events with a few directed comments on when something unusual happened", then this is the page. If you delete this page, you force the reader to investigate several dozen individual event pages to find the same info, and then cross check with the competitor bio or national Olympic page to see if there is relevant info about significance not captured in the tables. Many times "it's useful" doesn't mean |ITSUSEFUL
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSUSEFUL)

Comment: deciding what is a highlight or not violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)