Deletion of Tudor's ITSM Process Assessment

Comment: strongly.  More vague and unreadable "process" and "method" apparently involving the supervision of computer programmers, confusingly written to give the process the false appearance of rigor through the Occam's Razor|multiplication of steps beyond necessity.  Contains buzzwords typical of spam ("best practices" &c.) Non-notable |neologism designed to |promote a particular business
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:SPAM)

Comment: After taking another look at this nomination, I still don't see any evidence of |significant coverage in |reliable secondary sources. My earlier recommendation remains unchanged
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: No Google News results for ''Tudor ITSM''; no independent Google Scholar results for ''Tudor ITSM Assessment''; 10 Google Web results for http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tudor%27s+ITSM%22+OR+%22Tudor+ITSM%22+-wiki "Tudor's ITSM" OR "Tudor ITSM" -wiki show no signs of |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)