Deletion of Biblical definition of God (2nd nomination)

Comment: I believe the original AfD concluded with the appropriate decision. I am personally baffled by some of the language in the article (God engaging in ''commerce'' with other deities?) and the article cherry-picks the Old and New Testaments to create a distinctive concept that strays too far into  territory to satisfy NPOV standards. I don't think this requires salvaging, as existing articles already cover the very few salient points raised here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: As was pointed out in the original AfD, we have a _very_ large number of articles on God - this one does not add anything significant to them, and, as it stands, fails /
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: The brevity of this article, and the specialized selection of material, give the aura of |original research. When there are already many articles on a topic, a new one like this should be integrated in some way. I don't see any discussion showing how this fits well with existing articles. Duplication or inconsistency seems inevitable. Even those who voted Overturn in Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_April_19|the DRV do not seem to have had a specific idea of what to do with this article. They seemed to hope it would ''develop''. UncleG opened the DRV because nobody noticed he had added new sources. Now that the sources are here, it is still baffling where to take this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)