Deletion of Two Way Cousin

Comment: The term http://www.google.com/search?q=double.cousin double cousin is more often used for this sort of thing. Note that we have double first cousin already. I can find no evidence this is a term that is even in wide use, let alone one that would pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: There are problems with |OR and the writing style, but that is not the main problem. There is no verifiable evidence that the term even exists. Google returns only 6 hitshttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Two+Way+Cousin%22, none of them pass  and certainly nothing here to satisfy . It could be that the same concept is actually known under a different name, but the article's creator needs to find that out first
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: WP:RS,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)