Deletion of Christopher Sign

Comment: per  and . The "one event" mentioned earlier doesn't even have its own article, and I don't consider other media sources' coverage of his coverage of a story to be independent, no matter how many of them picked it up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: while he is noted for one incident, it is a rather major incident with national coverage referring to his involvement in breaking the story.  There are many more sources than the one in the article.  See http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/07/01/how-was-local-reporter-tipped-clinton-lynch-meeting, http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/07/01/local-anchor-fbi-ordered-no-photos-no-pictures-no-cell-phones-for-clinton-lynch-meeting-still-have-no-idea-why-clinton-was-in-phoenix/, http://www.mediaite.com/tv/reporter-fbi-ordered-no-photos-no-pictures-of-lynchclinton-meeting/, http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/07/01/reporter_fbi_instructed_no_photos_no_pictures_no_cell_phones_on_tarmac.html, http://footballmatters.org/former-alabama-football-player-breaks-major-election-news-story/, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/1/loretta-lynchs-meeting-with-bill-clinton-prompted-/ and he was interviewed about this on the O'Reilly Factor.  Notable under , with note that  says "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate."  A major story in the 2016 US presidential campaign is highly significant and his role within it is large. The article certainly needs expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ONEEVENT)