Deletion of Norton PC Checkup

Comment: on the basis that it is notable and verifiable, which are our primary criteria.  I don;t think you can dismiss an article in CNET News as Original research, you know.  To me that passes  with some ease.  Sources can always be improved and a poor source is not a valid reason to nominate for deletion, simply a reason to enhance an article.  There are intriguing sources that do not pass our criteria which discuss some controversy about the service.  Finding a reliable one would be valuable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Does not meet ; unsourced information; "Running the software to end of job results in suggestions that further software or services are bought in order to remove the problems stated to be found." True, however no references provided
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)