Deletion of Anti-globalization and antisemitism (4th nomination)

Comment: Per nom, it is  full of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:SYN)

Comment: Good sources, well written, well-balanced. More than satisfies the requirements , , and . Objections appear to be based on a misunderstanding of policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)

Comment: this execrable article is an obvious bad-faith attempt to smear a particular group as "antisemitic". Clear violation of . What little there is of value in this article can be treated better in new antisemitism or antisemitism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: as being much ado about nothing - this smells like a Wikipedia:Coatrack|coatrack article and seems to be placing |undue weight on the issue. The article's text seems to confuse conservatives with globalists and basically states that a person who opposes globalisation and zionism is a anti-semite, which includes accusing at least one indivudal
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: This article is fundamentally problematic because it takes a variety of disparate comments and lumps them together under the rubric of "anti-globalization and antisemitism." That is a clear example of |original research by synthesis. Any worthwhile material in the article can be incorporated into Antisemitism and New antisemitism, but this article in itself is simply |soapboxing and is a clear violation of . It should have been deleted long ago
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:SOAP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)