Deletion of Foresight Institute

Comment: Meets  per a review of |available sources, such as those provided above by {{u|Rhododendrites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: apart from this article being almost entirely sourced to primary sources, I couldn't find any sources that didn't fall foul of  - nobody outside its particular piece of the fringe appears to be interested
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRIND)

Comment: Passes : the subject of a http://www.sfweekly.com/news/sidebar-looking-at-foresight/ San Francisco Weekly article, covered in several places throughout https://books.google.com/books?id=i-Xh0i4-mnYC The Visioneers (Princeton University Press), covered in several places in https://books.google.com/books?id=GPqKBAAAQBAJ Toward a New Dimension (Oxford University Press), it has its own entry in the https://books.google.com/books?id=vyp1AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA253 Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society (SAGE), it's the subject of a section in https://books.google.com/books?id=KtyiUrTrFtIC Nanotechnology (CRC Press Taylor & Francis), subject of a section in https://books.google.com/books?id=rTPkmNLs870C Nano-Hype (Prometheus)... this isn't even counting the less substantial articles here and there covering the Feynman prize. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)