Deletion of Fallacy of prescience

Comment: as |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: A single, dated, and primary source that is not independent of the researchers proposing the term is far bellow the threshold necessary to establish notability.  This is essentially a case of an attempt to up-jump a eologism--and considering that the source was released more than a decade ago and not a single other researcher or source has embraced it, I think it's clear that it never broke into popular usage.  Indeed, the one source that does exist is not sufficient to support more than two sentences of content.  I just can't see any justification for maintaining this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)