Deletion of Hastings/Bexhill

Comment: per  and . No sources cited or found for evidence of usage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:V)

Comment: there are a few Google results, on council websiteshttp://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Hastings%2FBexhill+conurbation%22&btnG=Search&meta= but they appear to be about a possible |future development. |Verifiable information could be mentioned in the separate town articles but to create a separate article for this |neologism is not necessary, particularly as it has not had significant coverage in |reliable sources. The only non-Wikipedia resulthttp://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Greater+Hastings%2FBexhill%22&btnG=Search&meta= for "Greater Hastings/Bexhill" is also on a council website, and refers to an area, not a conurbation. It is also a non-notable |neologism. The Seaspray name appears to be completely fictitious, and I removed it from the article when I added the {{tl|prod2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:V||WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:NEO)