Deletion of DataStax (2nd nomination)

Comment: After the rewrite, the article is based on multiple reliable sources including articles Dr. Dobbs, InfoWorld, InformationWeek, eWeek, ZDnet, and NetworkWorld and content from a book from a reliable publisher. Most of these sources are in-depth. These multiple reliable sources establish notability per . Promotional and any copy vio problems were eliminated by the rewrite. A notable topic and and a modest start class article with  for improvement all suggest keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: Meets : http://fortune.com/2015/04/14/datastax-hp-sales-partnership/, http://www.drdobbs.com/open-source/datastax-manages-big-data-trio-real-time/232700037, http://www.networkworld.com/article/2228768/opensource-subnet/datastax-wants-to-make-cassandra-the-best-nosql-of-them-all.html, http://www.informationweek.com/big-data/big-data-analytics/datastax-brings-spark-to-cassandra/d/d-id/1252658, http://www.zdnet.com/article/datastax-branches-out/, etc. etc. Also keep per , per {{u|Mark viking}}'s work on the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:HEY)