Deletion of Me and My Mates vs the Zombie Apocalypse

Comment: per meeting .https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Me+and+My+Mates+vs+the+Zombie+Apocalypse%22&tbm=nws An inexperienced author's not using available reliable sources and a nominator's failure in |not finding them does not mean "TOO SOON". For instance, the in-depth article in http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/canberra-film-me-and-my-mates-vs-the-zombie-apocalypse-cinema-premiere-20150723-gih0zl.html ''Sydney Morning Herald'' was really quite decent, and there are https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Me+and+My+Mates+vs+the+Zombie+Apocalypse%22&tbm=nws many more. And because the  nominated format https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Me_and_My_Mates_vs_the_Zombie_Apocalypse&type=revision&diff=717237151&oldid=717232239 was sketchy, I have https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Me_and_My_Mates_vs_the_Zombie_Apocalypse&type=revision&diff=717306223&oldid=717237151 begun improvements per MOS:FILM... really |quite easy to fix something perceived as weak. The flaw in nominating a new article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Me_and_My_Mates_vs_the_Zombie_Apocalypse&type=revision&diff=717237151&oldid=717232239 '''90 minutes''' after it was contributed and without BEFORE might make such action appear a bit |bitey to the https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Jackoshea5181&project=en.wikipedia.org new contributor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPROVE||WP:BITE)

Comment: in view of the sources put forward above for both names of the film showing that it is of interest in the media and that  is passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)