Deletion of Reaction to the death of Michael Jackson

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Whilst I'm aware that therstuffexists|other stuff exists isn't a reason to keep an article in itself, there is an article on Death and state funeral of Ronald Reagan|the death and aftermath or Ronald Reagan, and it seems likely that even at this early stage there will be more than enough to make a fairly in depth article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: WP:NPOV|POV, , , etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: significant figures'' is  (or ?). Can be adequately covered in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:OR)

Comment: Un-necessary fork that can be covered entirely in his own article. Article also runs afoul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per ; also looks like Death of Michael Jackson is back up again after being deleted yesterday, so probably no point in doing an AfD for this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is a ridiculous example of .  If a few years later, this topic seems notable in and of itself then maybe, maybe I could consider a split/fork...but as it is this page is absurd and a crazy waste of effort
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)