Deletion of Zambranaing

Comment: Non-notable 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per . Google https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=nn#fp=f7440eac9870c769&hl=en&q=%22Zambranaing%22 doesn't have much to say on this term, to say the least
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Does not appear to have any coverage in any kind of |reliable source, and none of those arguing in its defence have shown any. I doubt even Urban Dictionary would accept something with this level of sourcing, much less Wikipedia.&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per .  I can find zero instances of use in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: A neologism with no evidence of notability nor any coverage by independent sources per . Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Things do not become |notable because they are on Wikipedia; things are on Wikipedia because they are already notable elsewhere.  Basically, if anyone can provide evidence of widespread use of this term, please do so.  (Note, a bunch of pictures of cyclists in the countryside is ''not'' proof of widespread use of the term; it is merely proof that many cyclists enjoy this type of portrait
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)