Deletion of 2019 Windward Islands Tournament

Comment: a friendly international football tournament, passes . See http://stluciasportsonline.com/windward-islands-senior-men-football-tournament-2019/ https://spiceislander.com/?p=14258 https://www.stlucianewsonline.com/team-saint-lucia-departs-to-st-vincent-and-the-grenadines-2019-windward-islands-mens-championship/ https://searchlight.vc/searchlight/front-page/2019/03/05/svg-kicks-off-wifa-tournament-with-two-exciting-wins/. While it may seem routine, this is the level of coverage expected for the region
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per aper it makes sense to have seperate articles for each year rather than significantly increasing the size and loading time of the parent page. Also, as the parent article is notable this is a valid split which does not have to be independently notable but it in any case it is independently notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: The most important factor for me is that this is ''not'' an AfD to delete Windward Islands Tournament, it's an AfD to delete 2019 Windward Islands Tournament. So it's not like if we delete this article, this tournament won't be covered in the encyclopedia. The only question for me is, ''do we need a separate stand-alone article for each year of this tournament?'' The answer is no. There is not GNG for the ''2019'' edition. All the links posted here (and all I can find online) are articles about ''a particular team'' playing in the tournament. Most of those are routine; the ones that are significant in length are SIGCOV ''of the team'', not ''that year's tournament''. Where, for example, is the long article about "Our predictions for the 2019 Windward Islands Tournament"? Or "How this year's teams will stack up against each other". You get that stuff for highly-notable tournaments, like the World Cup. Only those super-major tournaments merit a stand-alone article for each year. Although I think the tournament itself is notable, and the teams that play in it may be notable, the tournament doesn't receive the kind of GNG coverage that would make each separate year notable enough for a standalone article. Per , information about each particular year should be at Windward Islands Tournament and not in a per-year standalone. We don't even need a redirect here. Although redirects ''are'' cheap and harmless, if we did one for every year of every competition, we'd have a lot, and we'd have to create more each year. So, delete, and our readers will find the same information at Windward Islands Tournament
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PAGEDECIDE)

Comment: Editors involved in the AfD should commit themselves to much more than 'small' or 'moderate' amounts of related effort This is a most significant process, since it can result in the deletion of articles. And it's not a question of text size either because stub-size articles are, of course, entirely acceptable in Wikipedia. The main criterion is |verifiable |proof of |notability. A serious effort, then, undertaken to assess the Keep suggestions shows that the subject does not meet the |notability criteria for a sports event: {{tq|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information or a news service. Wikinews offers a place where editors can document current news events, but not every incident that gains media coverage will have or should have a Wikipedia article. A rule of thumb for creating a Wikipedia article is whether the event is of lasting, historical significance, and the scope of reporting. National or global reporting is preferred.}} This tournament gets the attention of a few local media sources (exhaustively offered above by SportingFlyer) without any further coverage. A comnmendable perhaps event but  not possessing Wikinotability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:EVENTCRITERIA)

Comment: full international tournament that passes  as per the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  as per the sources identified by Sporting Flyer and the article is one of a series if you check the category, WP :Permastub acknowledges that stubs are acceptable, the Encyclopedia Brittanica has many of them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)