Deletion of Neverwinter

Comment: green|In universe or mostly primarily sourced}} is not relevant to deletion, per , , and . Others above have begun to better cite the article, which is the legitimate solution to those concerns. As someone unfamiliar with the topic, I find the arguments in favour of deletion to be thoroughly unconvincing, treading the edges of  and  (which confuse snobbery for policy). I'm willing to change my mind if someone presents a better argument for it not passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:ATD||WP:ARTN||WP:RUBBISH||WP:WEDONTNEEDIT||WP:GNG)

Comment: per comments above and per  and , although I feel that Neverwinter (disambiguation) would be wortwhile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: there really is nothing here that passes the standard at  and nothing to merge. The games that use this setting already say it all, and a short disambiguation page would work
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: to Neverwinter Campaign Setting, Neverwinter (novel), or Neverwinter (video game). This is purely primary or unsourced information that does not meet the  separate from the articles covering the fiction itself
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)