Deletion of Sophie Mawhinney

Comment: I ''have ''read the Uncle G article, and it says much the same as  - if something is not notable enough for an article, it may be possible to preserve some of its content by merging. But what are we to preserve from this? Not the toddler club and the hard-working bits; only "''Sophie won Shropshire Young Musician of the Year 2008.''" That's verifiable, but is it encyclopedic? and where would we merge it to? It would have to be "List of winners of UK county Young Musician of the Year awards" or "List of |UPANDCOMING young musicians", and neither of those really sounds like an encyclopedic article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NNC||WP:UPANDCOMING)

Comment: Pretty much all winners of any music competition will be verifiable, as the results are usually published somewhere, or reported in a local paper. Unless the competition is significant (something like Leeds International Pianoforte Competition springs to mind) the winner is not notable. I have also removed personal info that is probably against 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: though I'm not yet sure to what.  Reasoning:  Sophie's article is |verifiable from |reliable sources, and reliably-sourced material should not be deleted because of .  However, she's not |notable enough for her own separate article, so a merge is the only outcome consistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.It's annoying that there doesn't appear to be an appropriate list of musicians.  I'm open to suggestions
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:N)