Deletion of Fictional genealogy

Comment: agree with Jclemens that some indiscriminate claims are nonsense, but this is a textbook case. No third-party sources to  of this concept. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be the first place you cover a topic, even if you can assemble a few things we know exist (like the Sopranos family and the McDucks family). If a reliable source directly covers the whole topic then recreate the article or list. But until then it should remain deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:verify notability)

Comment: seriously |listcruft information and nothing in that list is |sourced. It is just an #INDISCRIMINATE|indiscriminate list of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:RS||WP:NOT)