Deletion of Mike Maloney

Comment: After looking at those sources I'd say he fails ; I believe he ''exists'' but I don't see why he is notable. Plus vanity advert created by SPA which has now been banned, and multiple deletions over the years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the content that was purged was not up to Wikipedia standards: YouTube links, boasts by the subject himself, and meaningless fluff; plus a claim for notability-by-association in defiance of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS)

Comment: as lacking reliable sources with in depth coverage as per the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and  and  and  and  and a bunch of other stuff
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Per  #4, the exhibition/permanent collection in the Victoria & Albert Museum of the ''Amplification system'' is about half way to notability. If there are other major museums that have the ''Amplification system'' it could increase notability further
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Per nominator, vanity article. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)