Deletion of Harnessing the Wheelwork of Nature: Tesla's Science of Energy (2nd nomination)

Comment: Looks like an ad. Fails . Unless there is a considerable change to the article,  I say delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:NPOV)

Comment: I worked on fixing up the citations to reviews in this article from its former worse state. But in general I think the requirement of having multiple published reviews sets a very low bar for articles; it should be possible to find such reviews for a very large proportion of academic monographs, for instance, and I don't think most of those deserve articles (the subject of the monograph, quite likely, but the book itself, no). I'd rather see either a combination of  #1 and one of #2–#5, or a strong pass of #1 rather than a just-under-the-wire pass. This book may have #1, under a liberal interpretation of nontriviality and independence, but not strongly and it doesn't have any of the others
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: The 150-word review posted above fails to meet , section 1. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)