Deletion of Wolfe+585, Senior (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are more than enough reliable references for notability (some are less reliable, but AP, other newspapers, Guinness Book of Records, Names: A Journal of Onomastics, and maybe 1 or more of the cited books are ).  He's attracted a lot of media interest over a long life.  If there was a merge target I wouldn't be opposed, but I can't see one. I don't think  applies because even if you want to argue that he's not notable, his naming is a notable event (it has received press and book coverage over decades) and therefore you'd have to rename the article to The Event of the Naming of Wolfe+585, Senior
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Sometimes people are famous for silly reasons. This fellow had plenty enough continuing coverage such as to hurdle , and the article's about as well-sourced as we could ask for (with more on the way, apparently
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)