Deletion of Krasnoklutchevskaya Dam

Comment: The controversy described in the sources (which can be found in the ru_wiki article) is well worth the coverage and qualifies as notable.  does not discriminate between "local" and "mainstream" sources. On whether the spring is more notable than the dam, it's hard to say, but I'd be OK with merging the dam-specific information into an article about the spring. While both subjects are notable, they are hardly high-profile, so whether the final article will be primarily about the dam or the spring, it probably doesn't matter much anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The Russian coverage does seem to be enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)