Deletion of William Coates (longevity claimant)

Comment: While accepting this is a marginal case and thanking BrownHairedGirl for her work, I feel this ''does'' come under . The one event is the misunderstanding as to what his age was at his death. That's the only reason he has any fame. The coverage offered in support of a GNG argument is all around that. What I don't see is any significant coverage of this person beyond that error
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as notable per . A trivial Google search for https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22William+Coates%22+Maryland+1889 "William Coates" Maryland 1889 throws up three further items of substantive coverage on the first page of hits alone: UPIhttps://www.upi.com/114-year-old-man-dies-in-Maryland/83181077728089/, NBC Newshttp://www.nbcnews.com/id/4428272/ns/us_news-weird_news/t/old-not-old-md-man-was-only/ and the Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/2004/02/25/beautiful-114-year-old-man-dies-in-md/804d065f-0784-4319-8260-ea0736ee6ba1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: What people claim passes  is just  here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This article fails  and . The experts say he was a fraud and there is very little reporting on him or anything to say about him except brief information on record possibilities if his already disproven age claim was true
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOPAGE)