Deletion of Arie Bialostocki

Comment: There is very little that can be said (with appropriate sources) about who he is or what his accomplishments might be. Apparently he retired a year or so ago http://issuu.com/uidaho/docs/math-news-11-12, explaining the lack of recent publications. His level of citation (on Google scholar) is not high enough to convince me of a pass of #C1. This is not a high-citation field, so I don't want to draw too much of a conclusion from the citation count, but it does make it harder to argue for notability that way, and I don't see any other  criterion that he could use. Before tagging the article for notability I searched for other evidence, but didn't find any. And certainly the Erdős number is just a case of : he once worked with someone famous, but that doesn't make him famous himself. There is a single sentence about him in Soifer's coloring book saying that he once ran a computer search for solutions to a combinatorial problem; that's also not the basis for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:INHERITED)

Comment: You are quite correct that consensus is that Erdos number does not give a pass of rof. Cites are on the low side, let us see what the mathematicians think
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per Eppstein's research -- usually professors' retirement or obit notices give evidence for passing  if such evidence exists, but the linked article does not (it asserts that he was an above average teacher, but that's not enough for a pass without at least state-level or, better, national recognition
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)