Deletion of GGV Capital

Comment: This passes the notability threshold as set forth in .  The criteria there is the "company ... is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources".  The article currently has listed several third party sources that provide articles about the firm.  I don't think a claim can be made that any of these constitute trivial coverage.  The commentary about whether the AltAssets news service meets the criteria for relaiability, per , I think it pretty clearly is (1) reliable - the news is accurate, comprehensive on this sector and presented in a factual non-biased fashion, (2) third-party - there is no affiliation with the firms it covers or any claim that it covers this firm more because of some relationship and (3) published source - this is a widely available source that has been used and accepted in many other places in wikipedia.  If we establish this is a  then I think it is difficult to make the case that the article is not properly covered
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:RS||WP:RS)