Deletion of Iraq War order of battle, 2009

Comment: this was questionable even at the time as its scope ("the entire conflict for the year" as opposed to the order of battle for, well, a ''battle'') skirts the edge of , and the includion of unit CO names is slightly concerning (a lot of these I would question if they were |actually publicised - lots of times they ''arent'' and therefore they would be inferred). Even without those concerns thoough this is, as the nominator mentions, |not an encyclopedic subject in the state that it is in, and I don't see how it could be |rebuilt to a specific level of encylopediacity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:TNT)