Deletion of Mako (The Legend of Korra)

Comment: As third party coverage seems to be the crux, I would like to suggest that sites like http://www.curiata.com/about.php Curiata.com (self-published by a group of friends last year) and http://www.hypable.com/about-us/ Hypable.com, which describes itself as "By Fans, For Fans" should  not be considered towards establishing , and may not be considered reliable, as the articles seem to be short recaps of shows, followed by a fan's opinion. That Hypable declares "We don’t buy into that philosophy of only posting the big stories. Hardcore fans want to know all the latest news of their favorite movie, tv show, book series and so on, regardless of how big or mainstream it is", suggests low inclusion standards and devoted coverage to subjects that do not necessarily meet Wikipedia's inclusion standards. As the internet becomes ever more bloated and subdivided into obscure news outlets, blogs of various editorial standards, etc. and news/entertainment/opinion become increasingly blurred, I think it is important to keep a critical eye on sources themselves, and not simply assume "published online" means "notable". We would not expect an article on Backstreet Boys to primarily cite Teen Beat magazine, and perhaps sources at least one step removed from fandom and the hype it stirs should be a measure of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Someone has done much work to make these 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly '''way''' too much  here, but all articles have significant coverage from independent sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANPOV)