Deletion of Pad feet

Comment: per improvements to the article since AfD started.  The state the article was in prior to the AfD certainly warranted a prod.  Colonel Warden's edit warring to remove the prod without discussion was inappropriate, and such behavior only serves to support the inclusionist/deletionist |battleground mentality.  Had a civil, rational discussion taken place regarding the article's problems, then this AfD likely wouldn't have had to happen and the article could have been quietly improved without wasting everyone's time.  It seems that having a civil, rational discussion is a lot to ask of some people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BATTLE)

Comment: As the article is currently sourced, it meets .  Whether or not it should be merged into a wider topic on furniture feet or a glossary of terms is an editorial decision
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic is clearly notable - see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=nnVgWmR_H1MC&pg=PA42 Taunton's Complete Illustrated Guide to Period Furniture Details'', for example.  The |deletion process does not seem to have been followed and the proposal to delete this promising topic is contrary to our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IMPERFECT)