Deletion of Slaad

Comment: vacuous fancruft"'' shows that the nomination is essentially .  Adequate sourcing and notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Gavin's poorly researched nomination notwithstanding, there is no third-party coverage here, so the article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The nominator sites: #GUIDE, #PLOT, , , and |fancruft. It should be pointed out that NONE of those are reasons for delete or to bring an AFD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:WEASEL||WP:WAF||WP:FANCRUFT)