Deletion of 2016 Hurghada attack

Comment: Guys, we have  (already included on the entry) citing this attack as one of the reasons why tourists in Egypt went from 15 million to 5 million.  In a major country which largely depends on tourism.  If people are going to consider events such as this as insignificant... well, then maybe about 1/2 of the Wikipedia should be deleted because it's hard to understand what events could possibly be more significant than events such as this.  Not to mention that this was an ISIS attack by a (now convicted) operative of the Islamic State, Ahmad Abdel Salam Mansour.  Again, if individual ISIS attacks were to all of the sudden be considered moot and not worthy of Wikipedia, then there is a very long list of other ISIS knife attacks to be deleted!  It seems to me deleting this one only would be a mark of bias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: that this AFD is part of a recent series of terrorism-related AFDs in which Nom attempts to change the usual outcome of articles about terrorist attacks.  For at least several years, terrorist attacks have been judged notable under, when they meet , , and , and if borught to AFD a year or so later, kept if there has been  or .  Here, on her talk page, GSlick, persuades a fellow editor that this is the usual outcome https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheGracefulSlick&diff=792690727&oldid=792690269.  Obviously, Slick and I have differ.  But editors coming to this page should know that this is part of a campaign to shift the usual outcome in a category of topics
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME||WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:INDEPTH||WP:DIVERSE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:LASTING)