Deletion of Saxetism

Comment: Didn't your mother ever tell you it's not polite to ?  While we're at it, let's throw in , , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:OR||WP:V||WP:HOAX||WP:NFT)

Comment: You might want to read the comments above, many of which explain what it means for a religion to be |verifiable. It doesn't mean what you think it does
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I assure you, I am not trying to censor you at all. To quote from the primary |notability guideline, and as such expand on my nomination, ''"a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself"'' (emphasis maintained). Christianity, Buddhism, and the like have been the subject of such works. As for the verifiability, it is one of the three core content policies, the other two being OR|no original research, and writing from a POV|neutral point of view. Additionally, the threshold for inclusion within Wikipedia (from Wikipedia:Verifiability) is "'''verifiability, not truth'''" (emphasis maintained). That means since the material within the respective religion articles can be verified by editors using |reliable sources, the respective articles merit inclusion. Additionally
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:RS)