Deletion of Dethcentrik (3rd nomination)

Comment: Article meets GNG, by having coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources.  Specifically, the inclusion in Terrorizer and Metal Storm (both notable enough for their own articles on WP. Some of the others may be reliable (while I'm aware that much metal coverage is online rather than in print articles, I'm not entirely certain which ones are certainly RS), and if they are (specifically ''The Gauntlet'' and ''Braingell'') then that further establishes notability. I'm not entirely certain if IODA qualifies as a major record label, though if someone with more music knowledge than me says it is, then this also meets .  Overall, I believe that this article contains just enough information in reliable sources to qualify the band as notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: I urge any closing admin to check every single source for themselves, and to also read the article thoroughly. I would like the closing administrator to please take into consideration the following: Two albums on a major label are one of usic's potential requirements for notability, and two releases are available via IODA distribution, which is part of Sony Music Entertainment: http://www.iodalliance.com/catalog?type=artist&query=Dethcentrik&genre= link and the IODA has a long track record independent of simply being itself part of Sony Music Entertainment|Sony Music. KBPI is a radio station, and airplay is another indicator of notability, while granted I might agree that not much information beyond a tracklisting, composer information, and information on what album the music is taken from is available on that particular site. usic mentions "inclusion on a notable compilation album." So yes, inclusion on Terrorizer's CD is significant, not to mention the write-up on page 3. One of the authors on this deletion discussion tried to tag to page for speedy deletion as a re-post, despite notification from an administrator that is was not eligible
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M||WP:M)

Comment: While this article is not identical to the one deleted, it appears to suffer from the same problems. Basically though there are plenty of sources cited, it does not actually establish notability in the ways described at . It would appear from the references given that the band has received a lot of press coverage but most of the references are user submitted content, unremarkable blogs, or reprints of the band's own press releases. In general the references aren't what they seem to be. Take the ref ""Dethcentrik Video Banned By YouTube". MetalCrawler.net. 2011." for instance. No where in the linked review is any mention of YouTube. Some of them, such as the KBPI and Web of Metal contain no information related to the band. The Web of Metal page and the page linked on MetalCrawler are both nothing more than a link to the review on Metal Storm. There just isn't anything in the article to establish notability. The article and its references establish that the band probably does exist but that's not the criterion for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)