Deletion of SoCal Coyotes

Comment: The article and subject meets general notability guidlines  and applicable notability guidelines for sports teams  and organizations  in that it has significant national and international coverage  and receives verifiable  weekly coverage from multiple, independent, reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSPORTS||WP:ORG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NRV)

Comment: regardless of issues with the article or the actions of the article's author, subject receives plenty of |significant coverage for tertiary sources, however all the sources appear to be |local to the region where the subject is active in. While it can be argued that this meets , there are more stringent criteria that the subject falls under  & . When looking at this, the subject does not appear to pass ; therefore, failing that more stringent guideline, I cannot support keeping this article |until that is found published by a non-local source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:LOCAL||WP:GNG||WP:NGRIDIRON||WP:ORG||WP:AUD||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The article, which has been previously edited and improved by WP administrators, establishes notability with widespread significant coverage  of verifiable  reliable sources  that are two-thirds of those cited. These include significant national publications  that demonstrate the coach is not only a published author who has worked, and co-authored mainstream books, with top-tier NFL and NCAA professional coaches, but also utilizes their knowledge and relationships in the growth of the Coyote organization and the development of its players. Verifiable independent sources  include ISBN titles of  the actual books, their notable national publishers, which include MacMillan Publishers, Skyhorse Publishing, Bess Press, and the role of co-authors -- June Jones, Mouse Davis, Jerry Glanville -- within the Coyote organization
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NRV)

Comment: On its face, it appears that the subject of the article may have enough reliable sources to attest to its notability under the GNG (as local as most of them may be; this is complicated by the fact that they have never shown themselves to be able to even hold a steady long-term relationship with any league, so opposing cities' news sources aren't available). However, the tone of the article is far too grossly promotional, and the author's work reeks of that of someone with a |conflict of interest (whether or not the user actually has one is another question altogether). If a user believes they can take on the gargantuan task of totally rewriting this article, neutralizing its tone, and paring out the promotional content and dubious claims about its stature in the professional football scene, then they should transfer the article to userspace so that the sources can be preserved. Otherwise, this article reads like borderline spam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)