Deletion of School of Resentment (2nd nomination)

Comment: to ''The Western Canon'': '''Keep''': I actually think this is genuinely borderline between a keep and a '''merge and redirect''' to ''The Western Canon'', but I am leaning ever-so-slightly towards keep. I do not agree that subsequent engagement with this idea has been limited to name checks and passing mentions. It's in the title and main framing of some academic articles like https://muse.jhu.edu/article/445391/pdf this one, the author of https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=q8DGAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=%22School+of+Resentment%22+harold+bloom&ots=2Rkc8UCwPm&sig=qAeY0kA4jTh5FWVuiGRqoiZL5mE#v=onepage&q=%22School%20of%20Resentment%22&f=false this book explicitly identifies it as the main focus of an entire section of the book, searching in newspaper archives (paywalled, but I'll be happy to share sources on request) I found articles that deal primarily with this idea in newspapers from Colombo to Melbourne to Edmonton over several decades. There's enough to pass GNG and satisfy . But here's where I'm uncertain. It is very often discussed in the context of discussions about ''The Western Canon''; usually it's a big part of that discussion, but is still situated within or closely connected to a broader discussion of that work. I could probably be convinced that it is a neologism that should be a big part of that book's page, rather than existing as a separate standalone page
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Bloom's term is the subject of https://www.newpaltz.edu/media/english/shawreview/ShawangunkReview1999.pdf#page=19 continuing https://search.proquest.com/openview/92729c23e3563048154c95def382ea41/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=41210 scholarly https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/18125449608565864?journalCode=rscr20 comment, https://books.google.com/books?id=74RuDQAAQBAJ&lpg=PT91&ots=7-JZWUdSGx&dq=%22schools%20of%20resentment%22%20literary%20theory%20bloom&lr&pg=PT91#v=onepage&q=%22schools%20of%20resentment%22%20literary%20theory%20bloom&f=false analysis, and https://search.proquest.com/openview/80cf933e2147231064df6f3b1a213a7a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=40969 debate.  This makes it a notable concept separate from the book where it was first introduced. It easily passes the requirements of GNG in that even a cursory Google Scholar search discloses significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.   seems to have been truncated in this regard for this nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)