Deletion of Infonautics (2nd nomination)

Comment: Seems to have had significant coverage. Sufficient enough to pass . The shape its in now does not reflect what it could be. I would advise the nominator to improve the article instead of tagging for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not in the least promotional so the nomination is fundamentally flawed. Meets .  is also relevant. I declined the nominator's  request because I was of the opinion that the page could be fixed by editing, and this version demonstrates that. (Having said that, in the interests of balance, I should say that another admin did delete the page so that was not a universal view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTED||WP:G11)

Comment: a pioneer in this technology, was at one time , reasonably sourced and neutral in tone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)