Deletion of Daniel Keem

Comment: Although there looks to be plenty of references that mention or speak of this article subject, ''very few'' (like http://www.wetheunicorns.com/youtubers/keemstar-daniel-keem-drama-alert-who-is-pewdiepie-twitch/ this one, http://motherboard.vice.com/read/youtube-drama-is-causing-more-youtube-drama-about-youtube-drama this one, and https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/05/30/peel-regional-police-twitter-account-hacked.html this one) cover the article subject ''in-depth'' (and some of them cover an event, really). Significant coverage is not established here; there isn't enough |reliable sources that cover the article subject primarily and in-depth to be able to create an article about this person without the use of |original research, which is required to be established before  can be met. This person's focus area can be debated as to whether he's considered an |entertainer or a |creative professional; either way you look at it, this article subject fails the |notability requirements for both. Hence, I am voting ''delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOR||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:ARTIST||WP:N)

Comment: No mass following; has made no unique contribution. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)