Deletion of Kaido (company)

Comment: I agree with the analysis of sources above, they fail the criteria for establishing notability. I am unable to locate any sources that do, therefore topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: My reading of the available sources (including those listed above) is that they are a mix of local coverage and routine announcements of funding and awards that are not intrinsically notable. While these demonstrate that this is a company going about its business, I don't see the |coverage needed for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Not notable. Doesn't meet  or , especially DEPTH. Of the three references mentioned by {{np|Ihid}}, the first is a non-notable award announcement excluded by DEPTH, the second is an anonymous writeup from a magazine with no list of editors, and the third is a capital transaction announcement excluded by DEPTH. The company can qualify for an article when there are enough high-quality sources in the future, but that's not the case right now. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH)