Deletion of Takwin

Comment: All of this talk about "Google says it's real" and someone's PhD dissertation means nothing since '''none of it is in the article''' ... the basic policy of o original research says that there must be ''|verifiable |reliable source |citations'' for assertions of otability ... as nom states, "no sources or whatsoever" in this article, so as it stands, it is '''''blatant original research''''' since it is unsubstantiated by any reliable sources ... ''"It is not about what you know, it is about what you can verify."'' ... it looks as if this article was created solely to be referenced from Geber|Abu Musa Jabir ibn Hayyan, an undeniably notable 8th century Mulsim alchemist, but ''this subject is not worthy of an article of its own'' (except maybe {{tl|Copy to Wiktionary}}) ... this material should be '''merged''' with his article, possibly as a new section, or as an expansion of the paragraph in which it is mentioned. {{user|72.75.85.159
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:N)