Deletion of Polly Peterson Bowles

Comment: A state level beauty pageant might count toward notability if there were enough |reliable source coverage ''about'' her in that context to satisfy , but it does ''not'' confer an automatic inclusion freebie just because she exists — and being an unsuccessful ''candidate'' for political office does not speak to notability at all. And when it comes to the referencing, the beauty pageant and book are sourced to |primary sources rather than reliable ones, her birthdate and non-notable family members were sourced to a |user-generated genealogy site that policy explicitly deprecates as ''inherently'' invalid sourcing for ''anything'' in a Wikipedia article and therefore had to be stripped, and the little bit of actual RS coverage present is purely |routine local coverage of the election (one of which just namechecks her existence a single time). This is simply not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a state-level beauty pageant winner or an unelected candidate for political office ''notable'' for those things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:USERG||WP:ROUTINE)