Deletion of Former Muslims United (2nd nomination)

Comment: The lack of  indicates that, whatever the importance of the issues they organized around, they're not an organization worth devoting an article to. (Plenty of marginal and outright non-notable groups have formed with a mission statement about fighting illiteracy, world hunger, etc.) A redirect to Nonie Darwish wouldn't be out of the question (redirects are cheap), but I'm not sure how plausible a search term it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per  and {{U|Hemiauchenia}}. I would add that |extensive editing would need to be completed before this is an article, |not a soap-box. IMHO, ''Washington Times'' is not  areliable source, and since it is owned and managed indirectly by the Unification Church, it has a |undisclosed conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:TNT||WP:SOAP||WP:COI)