Deletion of List of claims made by Zeitgeist, the Movie

Comment: despite the claims on the talk* page, this is the definition of |Original Research and is also in vio of *, * (guidelines for editing?*) and maybe #WEBSPACE
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SOAP||WP:OWN||WP:NOT)

Comment: Clearly OR. The 'Guidelines for editing this article*' on the talk* page are rather odd and suggest |ownership issues as well. Wikipedia is not the creator of this article's personal website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: per nom as |original research with the potential to violate the film's copyright (by transcribing all the claims made in the film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: with extreme prejudice.  This is a |POV fork of the article on the movie
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Original research could be very easily avoided on this article, but it wouldn't make the concept |notable or encyclopedic. I believe the main article provides a very fair presentation of what is worth mentioning. Indeed, in the long and tumultuous course of this topic's existence on Wikipedia, countless sources were presented and hacked down to the few reliable ones. And it is only the information to be found within those sources that is truly worth noting. Readers who want to know every single claim made in the movie can follow the handy link to its official website and download it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)