Deletion of Kama Chinen (2nd nomination)

Comment: meets .  Death reported worldwide.  Non-notable people from Asia don't have articles written about them across continents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: notability has been established. Passes  and , so I see no reason that the article requires deletion. Could it use improvement and cleanup? Probably. But eletion is not cleanup|deletion is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO||WP:GNG||WP:D)

Comment: for more or less the same reasons I nominated this page for deletion a decade ago. In terms of sourcing, not much has changed; there is still no evidence of the type of coverage that would be sufficient to meet . There's nothing here of encyclopedic value that couldn't be reproduced effectively on one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per  and . Impressive worldwide coverage. In addition, there seems to be a consensus that persons achieving the status of oldest in the world are notable as such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: This article fails  and  because there is only sparse  coverage of her that fails to demonstrate notability and there is no notability guideline that "the oldest x" is notable. The content of the article is pretty much just trivia on how she relates to other peoples longevity milestones or longevity milestones for various jurisdictions. Besides one sentence about her health, there is essentially nothing said about her in an article about her that doesn't fit in a list. Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on four different lists, so this article is not needed. Given this individuals apparent obscurity, I think '''heavy weight''' should be given to her and her family's desire for anonymity as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E||WP:ROUTINE)