Deletion of Neuroleadership

Comment: This topic clearly passes Wikipedia's threshold of |notability, specifically , with entire articles in independent, reliable sources devoted specifically to the topic. Source examples include: http://forbesindia.com/article/richard-ivey/neuroleaderhip-making-change-happen/27152/1?id=27152&pg=1, http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-07-22/the-business-brain-in-close-up, http://allafrica.com/stories/201111301150.html, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2008-12-12/news/28454164_1_rewards-asian-paints-management-guru, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/et-high-flier/need-for-brain-based-coaching-and-significance-of-neuro-leadership-in-corporate-set-up/articleshow/8932966.cms. These are not passing mentions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: There appears to be some use of this term http://forbesindia.com/article/richard-ivey/neuroleaderhip-making-change-happen/27152/1?id=27152&pg=1 in Forbes, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2008-12-12/news/28454164_1_rewards-asian-paints-management-guru Economic Times, and http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-07-22/the-business-brain-in-close-up in BusinessWeek, the latter of which contextualizes it in reference to the sciences and business practice.  There's also some coverage of a book by the same name in these German sources (http://www.nzz.ch/aktuell/startseite/buch-des-monats-neuroleadership--erkenntnisse-der-hirnforschung-fuer-die-fuehrung-von-mitarbeitern-1.2991715http://www.abendblatt.de/wirtschaft/karriere/article1320176/Neuroleadership.html), but it's not immediately clear to me that these refer to them same concept.  In any case, while this might seem like a |neologism at first, there is actually pretty good coverage of the term that fulfills |the general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:GNG)