Deletion of Agustín Fernández (composer)

Comment: Notable composer, with substantial (but regrettably paywalled) coverage at Grove Music Online https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.46947, and substantial free coverage at British Music Collection https://britishmusiccollection.org.uk/composer/agust%C3%ADn-fern%C3%A1ndez. These are published by Oxford University Press and Sound and Music respectively, which are independent and reliable. GNG is met, and I think this also meets point 6 of . I have not looked through his works, it is possible that points 1 or 2 are also met in this case. I am satisfied based on the sources in the article and a few othershttps://www.opinion.com.bo/articulo/ramona/compositor-agustin-fernandez-es-profugo-justicia-delitos-sexuales-medios-reino-unido/20200412222650761732.htmlhttp://www.laprensa.com.bo/personaje/20200413/compositor-agustin-fernandez-es-condenado-en-el-reino-unido-por-agresion-sexualhttps://www.questia.com/newspaper/1G1-619569324/hunt-for-former-uni-professor-after-conviction-62-year-oldhttps://theworldnews.net/uk-news/composer-62-is-on-the-run-after-being-sentenced-to-23-year-jail-term-in-for-string-of-sex-attacks that the subject has been convicted and is a fugitive. So, this isn't a matter of "alleged" crimes, there is a criminal conviction. That isn't a basis for notability on its own, but since the subject is otherwise notable, the conviction should be covered in the article. I don't usually assign much weight to whether the subject of an article wants or does not want a Wikipedia article, and I consider that to be even less relevant when the subject's motivation is to hide the fact that they are a sex offender and a fugitive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPOSER)