Deletion of Untitled 2011 AMC television series

Comment: Perhaps I'm missing something, but this looks notable under . There are three sources listed, all of which are reliable and offer fairly significant coverage. The other argument is , but it seems to meet that as well. The criteria that ''"Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place."'' seems to be met by the sources already included. I can't see a convincing policy-based reason to delete this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per , but it seems that the guideline needs to be rewritten along the lines of  to make it more explicit that mere verifiability of the existence of projects is not sufficient for an article.--Special:Contributions/137.122.49.102|137.122.49.102
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NFF)

Comment: It's odd that they haven't chosen a name for this yet but it's going to happen so  doesn't apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)