Deletion of Don Vaughan (landscape architect) (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:GNG,  - He has received an ''honorary Doctoral degree in Law'' from a large university. Specific criteria notes of : ''"...significant academic awards and honors may include... ...,honorary degree,..."''. He is a member of the Royal Canadian Academy of Arts. Sufficient reliable neutral sources to meet general notability guidelines. Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCHOLAR||WP:SCHOLAR)

Comment: and I don't hand those out often. Easily passes  and  as there are multiple, non-trivial, independent, reliable sources about him and his body of work online, in the news, in books, and in scholarly works. He has been called a "visionary", "key", "prominent", "internationally acclaimed", " renowned", "award-winning", etc., and none of this is because of the online propagation of his own self-promotion as is often the case with non-notable individuals. I have added to the article to reflect some of this notability. As an aside, this has been |prodded twice and now is up for a 2nd AfD. Did no one do  or is there some conflict with the hockey community of which we need to be aware? This seems to be put up for deletion for no reason other than |WP:NOTMYTOPICAREA but maybe I'm not |assuming good faith here. I'd like to challenge the nominator and the unregistered user to provide a more nuanced argument as to why this article should be deleted, because I'm just not seeing it, it's not even a case of being marginally notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ARTIST||WP:PROD||WP:BEFORE||WP:LACK||WP:AGF)