Deletion of Nicholas Alahverdian

Comment: 1E with a good solid helping of  thrown into the mix. There's a whole section where someone has tried to reinterpret |primary source court documents to re-argue a legal case, much of which is a blatant  violation. Can someone  close this and be done with it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:PRIMARY||WP:BLP||WP:SNOW)

Comment: I deleted a large portion of the page as a  violation and outlined my reasons on the talk page (somewhat limited - it's worse than what I explained, I have further information that I am willing to provide to any admin that needs it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Like others have said, on a good day this might meet  at best. This isn't a good day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or perhaps redirect to Alahverdian v. Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families, et al, if that article meets the notability guidelines for court cases (I'm not sure what those are currently). I added the notability tag to the article and I'll repeat what I said on the talk page "Subject of article does not seem to meet  currently. The article does not violate  because everything is sourced, however the source articles do not verify notability. The only thing that comes close is the court case mentioned at the bottom, however, that still fails to meet the guidelines for a bio article (or even article pertaining to the event laid out within . Also, I have suspicions the article may have been made by the subject, which isn't expressly forbidden on Wikipedia, but doesn't help the argument that the bio was made simply due to the subject's notability." Special:Contributions/97.91.179.39|97.91.179.39
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:CRIME)