Deletion of Arnulfo Ventura

Comment: DGG is absolutely correct.  This article is completely promotional and this gentleman isn't notable. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTRESUME)

Comment: The topic passes , per
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The notability is not given via the sources provided, mainly secondary mention which fails to set . BTW, Northamerica1000 is not a SPA. From my experience, he is more of an inclusionist who sees value in every article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Co-creator of a non-notable beverage. (I checked Google News Archive to see if Bonadea beverage itself might be notable enough for an article, but no; all I found was a few mentions in trade magazines.) As for his personal notability, he gets a little coverage but not significant enough to pass . Maybe it's a case of . It also looks like a case for Melanie's Law: If an article refers to the subject by his/her first name, the subject almost always turns out to be non-notable. In this case it looks like the article was written by the subject himself, using the username Aarutnev (get it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:TOOSOON)