Deletion of Joseph P. Watkins

Comment: per ; strictly a vanity page and online resume. "...appearing as a primary source in multiple news articles, TV news programs, and so forth. This makes him notable" is not reflected in Wikipedia policies and guidelines. This does not make a subject notable;  in reliable sources does, but it's missing from this page. Accepting such promotional articles on insignificant subjects is not in the best interest of the project
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: There's clearly been a very professional ing job done here, but none of the cited sources, nor any that I can find elsewhere, meets the required standard of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB)

Comment: no  violation that I can see.  Subject meets  through sources already pointed out.  Just because someone is in a political party doesn't mean that the page should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom and . Lots of |little refs don't matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Making no comment on the current content of the article, it looks like the subject meets , appearing as a primary source in multiple news articles, TV news programs, and so forth.  This makes him notable.  Cleanup is certainly advised, and there may be room for some aggressive cutting, but as a political analyst, his opinions seem to be notable enough for the news to go into depth about them, so he should be notable enough to appear on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)