Deletion of Beata Nowok

Comment: The sources in the article are not sufficient in my view, and I am struggling to find better. Overall |#TOOSOON
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I see the same citation record as above but I think it's enough to be borderline but positive for #C1. It's not enough that I would have made the article myself but now that it's here I think we can keep it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: seems a bit  or perhaps  to me. Would have liked to see a few more paper citations, but if more prominent positions were held, or notable awards won, would happily change !vote to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:MILL)

Comment: Per Nom. I am going to have to draw a line "somewhere". I think "Having published work does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are.", but when they are on the low side then sub-splitting notability ("That might be low for experimental biomedicine, but for demography its quite enough.") seems to give differing standards. If we are going to go with 2 papers with over 100 citations as a criteria to pass Wikipedia:PROF#C1 (not giving any differentiation between authoring and co-authoring), citing 169, 93, 69 (one is almost there), then this would actually be |"too soon". "If" revisiting NPROF is required, that may or may not give results that "quadruple the number of academic bios", then that is a possible future discussion. As pointed out the current position of the subject and being just a member of something does not give added advancement. I don't have an academic background but if any "pinging" starts, where we are going to discuss a "more inclusive standard", please include me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I don't see the citability data here as sufficient for satisfying . The area is still statistics of some sort, and I would expect the bar there to be higher for passing #C1 based on citation data alone. The subject also has one journal editorial board membership, but it is for a brand new journal which is not yet indexed anywhere of significance. Her current position at the University of Edinburgh is that of a Research fellow|Research Fellow, which, as I understand it, is a mid-level non-permanent appointment (they also have a "Senior Research Fellow" and "Professorial Fellow" after that). Appears to be a  case to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I have added some more sources. Had this been at afc, I would have accepted it as passing #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)