Deletion of Brian DiMuccio

Comment: All that is being presented are writing credits.  Nobody is disputing that he has done work.  What is needed is to establish that he is '''|notable by Wikipedia guidelines'''.  This can be demonstrated through '''|significant coverage in reliable sources'''.  A link to Youtube that shows a writing credit is not significant coverage.  Having writing credits listed in IMDB is not significant coverage.  The nomination for an award for one of the film he wrote is not a writing award, and a check of the nominees shows a list so long it looks like every film shown in the film festival was "nominated
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Sadly the above comment reflects an all too common but nonetheless disturbing  bias against writers. Why, if "Little Witches" (one of the films that Mr. DiMuccio penned) and its cast all have wiki entries, shouldn't the creator of said material also be noted? There is a disheartening trend, regarding entertainment bio articles, of kow-towing to the almighty actor. How else can one explain the fact that no less than 29(!!!) ACTORS from that brilliant piece of filmmaking "Gremlins 2: The New Batch" have personal wiki bio entries? I've never heard of most of them, yet I don't see anyone clamoring for deletion of their articles. Perhaps the above user would be good enough to provide proof that all 29 are '''|notable by Wikipedia guidelines''' as demonstrated through '''|significant coverage in reliable sources'''? Failing that, I would hope he or she would come to realize that Mr. DiMuccio's body of work, though perhaps not to his or her personal taste, is demonstrably significant enough for inclusion here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)