Deletion of Stanley Page

Comment: per GS and Govvy. NFOOTY is a presumption, not an assumption, and that presumption is very weak when a player only meets NFOOTY by playing for a short time (like one game). I don't think it's up to !voters to prove that GNG is absent; I think it's up to !voters to show that GNG is met. Absent that showing–and absent ''any'' potential-GNG sources that we know of so far–it doesn't meet  and should be deleted. We can't write an article based on a presumption; and stat-permastubs are of no encyclopedic value. Also, it's just bloody obvious that a player who played in one pro game isn't very, very unlikely to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTBASIC)

Comment: Passes . We can't just "assume" that he fails  because he only played in one game. Have you actually tried to search newspapers of the era? Have you done a comprehensive search, keeping in mind many of them are not available online? Or are you just making an "assumption" that none exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  played in a competitive match between two professional teams
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: this 1930s player meets . This means that notability is assumed, and it isn't necessary to waste everyone's time with various comments about not meeting GNG - which only introduces , given to the poor extent of the Internet 90 years ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NATH||WP:BIAS)