Deletion of Jonathan Sarfati

Comment: I find Mr Sarfati's views laughable and potentially dangerous, but I think he definitely deserves an article. As long as it adheres to , , etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:BLP)

Comment: per sources from David D. Also if it counts at all he has been frequently rebutted at Scienceblogs which has in the past been considered to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Look, the page is a damned war zone, with huge boxes all over the page about banned editors. The entire article is POV. He has '''no''' independant sources outside of the circle of creationism and appears to have gotten '''no''' mainstream press. If writing a book is an indicator of notability, then I might as well have an article too. I'm also '''very''' uncomfortable with having a bio of a living person as controversial as this on Wikipedia, since it will attract nothing but trolls, Christian Creationist bashers, and POV pushers. While the article makes a valiant attempt at neutrality, it still fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)