Deletion of ATTRAQT (2nd nomination)

Comment: My "delete" opinion in the December 2014 AfD included search evaluation of the company's previous name, however other participants in that AfD saw more value in what I would regard as start-up coverage of AIM listing etc. The article material added subsequently is acquisition and reporting information, most recently appended with a long paragraph giving the CV of the incoming CEO - more suitable for the appointment press release or corporate webpage. Some discussion of the company's performance and prospects can be found on investor sites (e.g. https://simplywall.st/news/some-attraqt-group-lonatqt-shareholders-have-copped-a-big-60-share-price-drop/ "Simply Wall St") but I don't see that as rising above ''"routine coverage ... of changes in share or bond prices, of quarterly or annual financial results and earning forecasts"'': ''trivial coverage'' at . It is a company going about its business, but I still don't see |evidence of |notability. (However, if others disagree and this article continues, some form of page protection may be considered so that the article doesn't function as an alternative web presence for the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:RS||:WP:NCORP)