Deletion of Democrat In Name Only (5th nomination)

Comment: into Republicans in Name Only.  Only merge information about the term itself and its usage, not about conservative democrats, which belongs at conservative Democrats.  Yes, it is notable, but |we do not have articles for all notable subjects. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:OVERLAP)

Comment: multiple usages of the term in reliable sources, including news, books (used as far back as http://books.google.com/books?id=4T3mAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA1207&dq=%22Democrat+In+Name+Only%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Pl5eVLLdIMuuogS2lIKgAQ&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22Democrat%20In%20Name%20Only%22&f=false 1910), and in scholarly journal articles. Although the article might have some problems, it doesn't appear to be so bad as to ; see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NOTCLEANUP)