Deletion of T. Geenakumari (2nd nomination)

Comment: I would support a '''draftify''', as I believe its possible that more significant coverage could be located and assessed (per Beccaynr's identification of that 1994  article) as a possible source. With one excellent reference already in evidence, I'm hopeful that editors may be able to locate, read, and document additional sources that support 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . In reviewing the sources presented both in the article and in the first AFD, there is only one source with significant coverage of T. Geenakumari, the article by  Biju, K G in Malaysian. All of the other references are merely trivial mentions of the subject. For example, the  Singh, Kriti (2013). ''Separated and Divorced Women in India:Economic Rights and Entitlements''. Sage Publications. merely mentions  Geenakumari in passing within a footnote. The recent additions of Beccaynr are not any better, with only passing mentions of Geenakumaru or routine coverage of court cases without anything other than a name drop of Geenakumari. We need something more substantial that is about her directly and not just mentioning her in passing. With all due respect to the keep voters, could you please list the sources here which display significant coverage, because I am just not seeing anything other than this one source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)