Deletion of Kidnapping of Hannah Anderson

Comment: Has significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, so technically satisfies . But we collectively decided that mere routine news events, or routine crimes, while they satisfy the news judgement of newsmedia editors seeking to maintain viewership/readership, are not automatically encyclopedic. This story rises above "routine crime" in that it allegedly included a double murder, by a family friend, followed by the first use of celphone statewide Amber alert, and concluded with a shootout killing the alleged badguy by the FBI and a rescue of the victim. Thus it has several elements which elevate it above the average murder or kidnapping, just as the kidnapping of the Cleveland trio, or the emergency landing of a plane by Chesley Sullenberger rise above similar but less encyclopedic events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as totally tragic that this story is, there is '''no''' encyclopaedic analyse of the event in the article, no attempt to demonstrate any lasting significance to this crime, it is just a |news story and as such has no place here by policy, is should be over at Wikinews
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per .  Encyclopedic long-term notability has not been established
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The alleged kidnapping and murder satisfy the parameters of . The media coverage is pretty substantial. It would be wrong bit to have an article on this event
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: as per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP)

Comment: as this goes beyond  for the following reasons.  A) It involved much more than a simple kidnapping, but also involves murder and arson, not a routine combination.  B) It was the top headline on national websites (CNN) and radio (CBS Radio) across multiple days (I can't confirm television, as I don't watch much, and does NOR apply to AfD debates? )  C) The incident is used in analysis of the Amber Alert system in general.  See http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/13/justice/amber-alert-hannah/index.html?hpt=hp_t3 under heading "Why Hannah's case was unusual".  Although it certainly must be acknowledged that the incident predicates the discussion, but it appears likely this incident will become part of the long-term dialogue regarding Amber Alert.  For what it's worth, I think this incident also goes beyond MWWS, as when the story first became front-page material the ethnicity was not established, and Ethan's body had not been discovered so the initial Amber alerts included two individuals
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: There have been a large number of articles added covering crimes that have no lasting impact or national/global scope in spite of . While kidnapping did cross multiple states, this kidnapping has not demonstrated that it will have any impact afterwards. At the risk of speculating, I would guess that this kidnapping won't have any lasting impact (beyond affecting the Amber Alert system) in the future. IMO, anything related to the Amber Alerts should go in the Amber Alerts article rather than here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)