Deletion of Derek Chauvin (police officer)

Comment: agree with nom. BLPCRIME, PERP, BLP1E. Probably should speedy delete as this article contravenes BLP in a big way. It also duplicates material in an existing article - Killing of George Floyd. Agree with speedy per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A10)

Comment: This is a very straightforward  matter. Delete instead of merge/redirect because the main article doesn't need any of this content and Derek Chauvin is already a redirect. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: We already have a redirect at Derek Chauvin. This title with the unnecessary disambiguation doesn't even have the benefit of being a valuable redirect. Maybe it could be speedy-deleted per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A10)

Comment: per , more specifically criteria n°1
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Falls into 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: A10 imho would only apply if Derek Chauvin was an article, not a redirect. If this article was kept, it would have to be moved there. This is not eligible for speedy deletion anyway though because it would not be uncontroversial as  requires. Kire1975's argument that  and  do not apply if there is prior coverage of the subject's life is one that cannot be rejected without discussion (see ). If this article only mentions information that would go or is found in Killing of George Floyd anyway, its existence alone cannot be a BLP violation since BLP applies everywhere equally. Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:BLP1E||WP:CRIME||WP:BLP2E)