Deletion of The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution

Comment: but without a lot of passion). Note that I've extensively rewritten this. This monument doesn't quite make it under the general notability guidelines, I think, but the artist is certainly notable and it seems to me that any monument unveiled and dedicated by a president ought to be notable in itself. I've rewritten quite a lot of it, incorporating some of the sources listed above that were connected to ''this'' sculpture and not others created for the occasion. (The one with all the rocks, for those who've followed those links). I've searched for any other source I can find and included every reliable source I could access. I've eliminated some of the unsourced claims I could not verify under "Display". These, of course, can be restored with reliable sourcing. I also removed the video, since there is nothing to indicate it is not hosted in violation of |copyright and it is a promotional snippet that was not necessary to verify the information in the article. (If it is displayed at a primary source, I think it would be very appropriate to include as an external link.) I also have to admit that I found it kind of interesting. I didn't know that a "national monument" ''could'' be privately owned, much less used as collateral for a loan
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:LINKVIO)

Comment: This needs a re-write, and it needs to be renamed but I have found sources that I belive are on these monuments that carry good information, and confer notability; http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=1dMQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=04sDAAAAIBAJ&pg=1299,5919560&dq=constitution+bicentennial+monument, http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=PI&s_site=philly&p_multi=PI&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB29F33D1861BBD&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM,http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FnsQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vIsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=1149,3734793&dq=constitution+bicentennial+monument, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=dNwVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=rRMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6441,4973483&dq=constitution+bicentennial+monument, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7sMTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=UAcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3957,988301&dq=constitution+bicentennial+monument+rose+bowl, http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/22/business/wall-street-the-dubious-profits-in-patriotism.html?pagewanted=2, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=7sMTAAAAIBAJ&sjid=UAcEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3957,988301&dq=monument+to+the+bicentennial+of+the+united+states+constitution, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ZYIIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=kzUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6727,2387762&dq=monument+to+the+bicentennial+of+the+united+states+constitution, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=IAsUAAAAIBAJ&sjid=BYsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6668,1343125&dq=spirit+of+freedom+monument, http://www.highbeam.com/search.aspx?q=BLACK%20CIVIL%20WAR%20SOLDIERS%20GET%20A, http://books.google.com/books?id=Z_vBh1PfdgoC&pg=PA123&dq=Spirit+of+Freedom+Monument, http://books.google.com/books?id=Qmh3AAAAMAAJ&q=Spirit+of+Freedom+Monument&dq=Spirit+of+Freedom+Monument. With that being said I also |assume good faith I find no reason to believe that this articles creator made this stuff up. I am willing to help re-write this article if need be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)