Deletion of List of professional tennis players from India

Comment: The list is currently in poor shape, but given the great number of entries in :Category:Indian tennis players, it could obviously be expanded, and per  it's justified as an alternate mode of article navigation and organization in addition to a category.  Further, the subdivision of the category into subcategories provides an additional reason for a list, as the list can maintain all entries on one page.  Plus lists can annotate, sort by means other than alphabetical, etc., etc., etc.  I agree with Mandsford that the deletion nom seems to just be a list of IDONTLIKEIT examples, pretty much expressly dismissive and scornful of the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: We have a category" is usually one of the weakest arguments against having a list, and often ends up with even bad lists being kept simply ''because'' the subject is notable enough for a category.  I see a lot of  here, and truth be told, I don't like it either.  I think it will be impractical to maintain a list of where professional players from India rank currently (this info was apparently derived from a list of world rankings so far).  Generally, I see no reason to list tennis players by nationality, since the focus is on the individual rather than where they're from.  Do people root for or against Rafael Nadal because of his nationality
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)