Deletion of Hafeez-ur-Rehman (cricketer)

Comment: He has played 4 first class matches, which is more than a 'trivial' pass of . And he was actually fairly successful, with 12 wickets at about 30 each, adding notability (although he would have passed in any case irrespective of performances after this many games. Article needs to be expanded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: clearly fails , a requirement for sports bios
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: or '''redirect'''. For players for whom only statistical match information exists, a better way to present this information is in a list article. There's not enough here for a stand-alone article.  specifically says mere statistical coverage does not establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)

Comment: No significant coverage to be found, only wide-ranging databases built on scorecard data and passing mentions in various weekly roundup reports, so fails  and . This trumps the trivial pass of , which is by consensus unreliable predictor of coverage for cricketers such as these who have played very few matches, in this case for a lesser regional association. Played far more cricket for Rawalpindi in non-FC age-group cricket, and for Humak Engineering in Grade-II and lesser cricket, so a redirect to List of Federally Administered Tribal Areas cricketers‎ may be undue, although it would be an accepted ATD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:NCRIC)