Deletion of Shame of Gaeta

Comment: It doesn't seem to me that it would be very hard to verify this with an independent source. As Graham seems to be not quite independent and Hudal certainly isn't, this fails /
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Per : ''Articles on neologisms that have little or no usage in reliable sources are commonly deleted, as these articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term.'' Article is about a vote among an small group of people of no importance whatsoever, and the result appears to have been misrepresented in the article. Assayer raises some good points about the article's factual accuracy.  Alois Hudal is an interesting character, but this incident is not worth mentioning in his article, much less in the ''Anschluss'' article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)