Deletion of A Sorcery Written in Blood (2nd nomination)

Comment: to the band's page. Not enough coverage to establish notability. Fails . In any case, there is not enough content to justify a stand alone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)

Comment: have you read through the previous AfD? There is a good explanation on why this topic passes , after being covered in both Firda and NRK's district office "NRK Sogn og Fjordane
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:CCC|consensus can change. Wikipedia is under more scrutiny and it's important for articles to meet certain basic standards. This article's defenders fail to respect the  as one of those standards. The good thing about a merge is that it can be reverted and undone. But not until someone finds reliable third party sources to provide significant information about this album
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is not enough coverage in reliable sources from which to write a Wikipedia article per . The topic merely is a subtopic of Gorgoroth and can be covered in that article in a subtpic length that is in proportion to the rest of the Gorgoroth article. The subtopic "A Sorcery Written in Blood" isn't ready for Wikipedia:Splitting and no one has provided arguments to establish that it is. The 1st AfD appeared to be more about rewarding "A Sorcery Written in Blood" with a Wikipedia article for making it on "the biggest newspaper in the county" and being noted by "Norways largest media organisation." You can't write a Wikipedia article from achievement. You need text from which to write a summary of that text. Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)