Deletion of Ray Chew (2nd nomination)

Comment: Google news turns up lots of good stuff, see http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Ray+Chew%22&cf=all this search which is loaded with in-depth reliable source material.  Several articles are behind paywalls or registration walls, but from just the abstracts its obvious that on the first page alone there are half a dozen or so unique sources that could be used to expand the current article, covering a wide range of subjects relating to his life.  That the current article is essentially a stub isn't relevent here, |due dilligence by the nominator would have turned up enough to establish that the article ''could'' be expanded with plenty of reliable, independent, and indepth sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)