Deletion of Jesse Shapiro

Comment: He appears to satisfy criterion 7 of , having made "substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity"- largely by virtue of a single paper on bias in the media that made a number of waves. See http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12510893 for the highest-profile example I can find
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: My usual position is that most assistant professors have not yet had time to demonstrate their notability, but there are exceptions, and he seems to be one. The bias paper is not even his most cited; it has 130 citations in Google scholar, while another on the economics of obesity has 387, and he has two more with 77 each. He seems to already be a star, and deserving of his position at one of the top business schools in the country. I think he passes  #1 already based on the academic impact his works have had, and possibly #7 based on the media coverage pointed out by Toptomcat and Raulbajob
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)