Deletion of Canadian Gun Nutz

Comment: This topic fails , because of the two references to reliable sources (http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/969638 and http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/808515--hepburn-u-s-gun-lobby-brings-hardline-tactics-to-canada), both offer only a trivial passing mention of Canadian Gun Nutz. The latter of those two refs mentions it only as the final item in a list. I see no plausible assertion that the article meets any of the more specific criteria of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:GNG)

Comment: Doesn't provide any independent, reliable sources and none appear available, so it doesn't pass  or any other notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per .  There appears to be no non-trival coverage whatsoever.  Also, oppose the merge suggested by DKiego, since there is no indication that this forum has made any notable, or even real, contribution to either Canadian "gun politics" or the firearms registry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)