Deletion of Otherkin

Comment: Maybe I wasn't clear.  I'm not saying this should be deleted because the belief system isn't credible.  Young Earth creationism isn't credible (to me) either, but clearly it's appropriate to have an article on it.  If this article used reputable sources, I would have no issue with it.  Some websites are reputable sources, some are not.  Anyone can have a website and claim whatever they want.  I invite anyone who's interested to read the websites listed as sources.  These are personal websites, not cnn.com.  Please, let's make this discussion about |verifiability, not the irrelevant-to-our-purposes question of the merits of the Otherkin belief system
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I think it's rather clear from even a casual reading that the  rule exists for preventing wikipedia from becoming a platform for cranks or ''pet theories''; the Otherkin article is neither.  Otherwise the article describing Bright|Brights would need to be deleted as well: it also explains the nature of a term used by a group to describe itself, and from primary sources at that. I'm sure it wouldn't take much effort to find other examples
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)