Deletion of Ohm Phanphiroj

Comment: This appears to be little more than the subject individual's own resumé, posted to Wikipedia. This runs afoul of  at least, and the tone and content definitely violates #OR and . While I could possibly be convinced otherwise, I don't think ''his works are shown in galleries and museums in the USA and Europe as well as in Asian countries'' qualifies as an assertion of notability, particularly since there is absolutely zero support for any of the assertions. It's not as clear a case of  violation as some, but I do think it is such a violation. And if none of those will do for a reason to delete, '''CaveatLector''''s observation that this text is copied wholesale from the subject's own website ought to do it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:NOT||WP:PROMO||WP:BIO)

Comment: this blather, because |WP:IMPISSEDOFF: I'm entirely innocent of the action alleged in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHoary&diff=261941430&oldid=261929052 this posting, though I'll concede that it woke me up in a way that no single cup of coffee could do, and that it has a certain black humor value. ''Contra'' Schweinwefermann, I ''do'' believe that ''"his works are shown in galleries and museums in the USA and Europe as well as in Asian countries"'' is an assertion of notability; I just haven't seen any evidence of this, and I have been waiting a long time. A quick look at Amazon showed that yes our man does indeed have at least one book published; its cover has a competent (focus, lighting, and exposure all OK) photo of a "hunk" with his legs widespread; those who are interested in male organs may be fascinated, while I (who happen to have other predilections) see no more (or less) ''photographic'' (or exhibition-worthy) value in this than in any of the lovingly lit depictions of female cleavage on the covers of the cheesecake anthologies published by the dozen every month in the nation where I happen to live. In other words, the man appears to be a competent artisan, no more; for two years I've been willing to be proven wrong via citation of  but this hasn't happened yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS)