Deletion of AONN Records

Comment: Article has been cleaned up since creation and is styled appropriately, but I cannot find sufficient sources to show it has achieved any kind of recognition that suggests it meets our criteria as an encyclopedic subject. There is almost no sign of the world taking actual note of it in a significant way either as a media company () or a controversy (OT#NEWS), or "enduring notability" (OT), nor any other criterion that suggests it is a significant media company ''for Wikipedia purposes''. Lots of self-pub and promotion websites of a OT#INDISCRIMINATE nature (myspace, mp3.com etc), next to no hard recognition in terms of cites showing significant editorial coverage and focus within reliable independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: I can not find any third party sources that cover this in detail. http://books.google.com/books?id=KMotkw4AK4oC&pg=PA107&dq=AONN+Records&hl=en&ei=Y7F-TZaLMtOTtwe7ndjtCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=AONN%20Records&f=false Skin deep is a trivial mention and can't work to |N. vI can't find any g-news hits and all of the google hits are not |RSes. The cited http://news.cnet.com/Feds-pull-suspicious-.gov-site/2100-1028_3-983384.html cnet article claim the company does not exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)