Deletion of IPhoneography

Comment: iPhoneography has nothing worth salvaging from it. It ranges across a number of topics, the vast majority of it inconsequential including , largely unsourced. It does not make a case for the existence of iPhoneography, nor indeed phoneography, as a thing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTAMANUAL)

Comment: This subject straightforwardly meets the  criterion 'topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject'. To show this, I've created IPhoneography#Further_reading, listing nine academic publications/theses on this subject -- and a quick scholar.google.com search shows that there are lots more I could have listed. Certainly this article could be a lot better, but its notability is clear. (Just to respond to some of the comments above, surely merging iPhoneography to Camera phone would be rather like merging Photography to Camera? Likewise, Wikipedia has a rich array of articles on different kinds of photography, listed at Category:Photography by genre. iPhoneography is potentially a great contribution to these
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)