Deletion of AXA UK

Comment: clearly notable firm. I think the nominator need not be reminded that fD is not for |cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: What a stupid nomination!  This is a large insurance company in UK.  The appropriate way of handling a bad article is to tag it for improvement, not to delete it.  Internal sources on what services a company offers are likely to be reliable, even if they do not fit .  Indeed they are more likely to be accurate than a newspaper's commentary on them, which may well be a poor summary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)