Deletion of Beth Sotelo

Comment: Both Comic Book Resources and Newsarama are considered reliable sources.  If they cover her work, then she is notable.  And obviously a colorist is an important part of a comic book if they review them at all.  So that'd pass  on its own, her work significant to a notable work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTISTS)

Comment: Using |primary sources for basic descriptive (non-interpretive) information, like where someone was born or where they went to school is fine, so long as the material is not unduly self-aggrandizing or self-promotional. "''I majored in journalism at NYU''" is fine. "''I graduated magna cum laude with a 4.0 GPA''" would be better supported by a secondary source. Nothing at  indicates that contacting individual editors is disruptive, nor a form of canvasing. Since posting solely on project pages often does not result in participation, contacting individuals, so long as it is done in a manner that is neutral and transparent, is perfectly valid
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:CANVAS)

Comment: There are '''two''' sources that discuss her, not one (Newsarama and Comic Book Resources), and they praise her coloring work. In some of the works she is co-colorist, and others she is the solo color artist. The panel discussions are a separate piece of information and haven nothing to do with discussion of the quality of her work, and I never said nor implied otherwise. Blogs are not valid sources, per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS)