Deletion of Paul pluta

Comment: fails , and per the comments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Pluta|the original AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCREATIVE)

Comment: to Queensland Rail, which presently has no mention of the subject and his findings. Essentially a  situation, but a merge will improve the latter article as per -M
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:ATD)

Comment: content relating to Queensland Rail into Queensland Rail: OK, he fails , but he has had mainstream newspaper coverage as a railway advocate/whistleblower. See this https://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22paul+pluta%22+%22queensland+rail%22&oq=%22paul+pluta%22+%22queensland+rail%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.6123j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Google search. But it's arguably |one event and could be merged into Queensland Rail. I note that the creator of the article on Paul pluta has been attempting to add content into Queensland Rail about the current problems with Queensland Rail (the Rail Fail) and Paul Pluta's role in predicting it (see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Queensland_Rail&type=revision&diff=809563612&oldid=809482770 diff) but this has been edit-warred away (probably more for style reasons than substance). It would not be unreasonable to mention Pluta's role in the matter (although in a slightly drier style) as we have reliable citations to support it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:1E)

Comment: possible G11 even: As mentioned, this was ''previously deleted'' as Paul Pluta; the current article is gaming the system to pretend not to be the same article, adding a lot of words to make it appear not to meet  (there is no ''substantisive'' addition to the article vis-a-vis the deleted one, just a lot of sesquipedalian loquaciousness to hide that), and  of references that don't actually reference what they're claiming to reference ("predicted the rail failsref", ref is about the 'rail fails' themselves). Furthermore this both fails  and, also, is blatantly promotional (note the wording: "One thing is certain, however. Mr. Pluta, by way of his Archie character, is working hard at succeeding at what he claims is now a full time pursuit. And it seems his base of followers is growing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4||WP:BOMBARDMENT||WP:NCREATIVE)