Deletion of Murray Hill (performer)

Comment: per , with specific reference to  - coverage should be in multiple sources, acc. to general |notability guidelines and entertainers are expected to have "made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." My !vote is only weak, however on the basis that AfD is not for cleanup and that if this individual really is notable then sources should be found to indicate as much and the article kept. If that was done while the AfD is in progress I'd move my vote to strong keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:NOTE)

Comment: Passes  and  without a problem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: per pretty much everybody except the nominator. While I have no idea why anybody would want to look like a male, (:p) the article clearly complies with all of the relevant criteria. The pattern of responses on this page makes the nomination look like a  issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)