Deletion of Lourds

Comment: the band seems, as we say, on the cusp of notability, but isn't there yet. There will be no problem creating this article sometime later this year or next when  is indisputably met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: lack of sources and external links (well, except for links that they own) lead me to believe that this article does not satisfy otability or usic. Is having a song that's played on ESPN/ABC (which are exactly the same in sports really - if you watch abc and there's a game showing you'll see ESPN in the bottom left/right) really enought for notability. I mean can you imagine seeing these guys in something link Britannica (I know we aren't Britannica, but still ... notability)'''Daniel()Folsom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:M)

Comment: sources cited are primary and/or trivial. Fails |the primary notability guideline without that,  or no
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: meets , albeit by a hair's breadth, by reviews cited. However, webmaster should refrain from editing, and if no one else starts contributing to it, it should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: borderline, but seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Borderline, but still meets  nonetheless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: zomg the webmaster of their MYSPACE is the article editor. I think such high authority is proof of their notability. (or lack thereof). Fails , among other things
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Article definitely fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)