Deletion of List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Alec Bedser

Comment: Per , and per my comments at a previous similar AfD: We're Wikipedia, not Cricinfo, this provides nothing but INDISCRIMINATE statistics, and "not every goal scored or match played..." () is also relevant (with the necessary vocabulary changes for cricket). Keeping as redirect is also out of the question per , since there's no reason this kind of article should exist: those interested in such statistics would do well to be pointed directly to Cricinfo, which usually contains the most up-to-date information, and is also free of potential errors caused by vandalism; and is the cited source anyway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS||WP:NOTDIARY||WP:PANDORA)

Comment: per /. {{tq|"To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources."}} This article is just a list of scores from ESPNCricinfo and has no independent sources covering these individual achievements as a set. Agree with nom that there should be no precedent to include these on players' articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS||WP:RAWDATA)

Comment: to Alec Bedser (removing details of the batsmen dismissed). No issues with inclusion in the main subject article, per  and , and would enhance the content there. International five-wicket hauls are a noteworthy achievement, and by definition, a list of them within the main article has the necessary context and explanation, so does not fail NOTSTATS in this regard. Unfortunately the nom seems to be misrepresenting the consensus of the cited RFC, which closed: {{tq|"There's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS||WP:SPLIT)