Deletion of Steve Bartman

Comment: Bartman is a much more notable subject than Murphy.  Bartman is still talked about today for something almost four years ago.  Also what he did affected the game and may have been a turning point.  He is clearly |notable.  Matt Murphy is not notable, he just happened to catch a notable ball
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I can buy a  argument for merging this into an appropriate Chicago Cubs season article (when created), or that year's NLCS article (can't remember off hand), but Bartman is someone who will be remembered for a very, very long time for what happened.  The topic is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I think there's plenty of historic notability for this fan to get past #NEWS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Bartman, who became the most hated man in the world among fans of a certain baseball team, actually may have interfered with the conduct of the game. This is very different from Murphy who merely had a baseball fall into his possession. There were many articles in independent and reliable publications which talked about Bartman for his action. Seems like a "|pointy" nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)