Deletion of Yadav Nathwani

Comment: The notability test for state legislators does ''not'' only attach to ''current'' incumbents, as was claimed by at least one person in the edit history — ''everybody'' who has ''ever'' served in the state legislature is ''always'' eligible for an article ''regardless'' of whether they're still in office today or not. The article does ''not'' read unduly promotionally in its current form, and any minor |conflict of interest problems can be dealt with through the normal editing process — but concerning the fact that the subject has edited the article himself, the only edits I can actually see in the article history that are signed "Yadav15" just involve perfectly reasonable formatting corrections and a perfectly neutral statement of the name of his successor. Literally not a one of them actually lapses into the |self-promotionalism issues that our COI rules actually concern themselves with — article subjects are ''not'' prevented from editing the article themselves to make purely ''factual'' edits that don't pose any  problems, the rule is just that they're not allowed to use Wikipedia as a personal ''PR'' platform or a venue for giving themselves the last word in an NPOV dispute. All in all, there's no serious reason why the article should be deleted at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SPIP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: passes  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Members of subnational legislatures are considering notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: There are some  concerns, with the subject of the article making changes to the page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: technically passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)