Deletion of Daniel Martin (United States Army)

Comment: No reliable sources give more than trivial coverage, so fails , not to mention the fact that this wqas only a second-tier military decoration
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom,  and . Although this individual's actions are highly admirable, being a recipient of the Distinguished Service Cross is not quite notable enough in itself per Wikipedia's guidelines. Also, there is an extreme lack of available sources as Skinny87 states. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: although the subject's service is honorable and commendable, it is |notable per , as it is only referenced at this time by a single website (which is nearly copied in whole or part by the article itself), or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:GNG||WP:MILPEOPLE)