Deletion of David A. Bray

Comment: Being a CIO doesn't make you notable, and it's marginal whether he passes . So, per , it should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: A number of sources which are reliable and independent have significant coverage of him, and he is an influential and high-ranking government official. He satisfies . He is certainly not a person outside the public sphere, a child or some unfortunate individual  known for one crime or one mistake,or for having some ailment, so "do no harm" hardly applies. Wikipedia is not  a vanity publication or voluntary directory, so we do not base our decisions about having an article on whether the person wants an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: to Federal Communications Commission#Modernization of the FCC.27s information technology systems. With all due respect to the article's subject (and |assuming good faith that the requester is, in fact, the article's subject), I believe that given the position he holds/held and the amount of coverage that results from that means that, while we might not want |notability, it is, sometimes, something that is unavoidable. That said, the coverage at the target mentioned there appears to be appropriate for his role with the FCC, and it would seem to be a reasonable compromise between the desire not to be notable and the unavoidable fact of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:N)

Comment: The relevant part of  is this: ''"Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete."'' He is not "relatively unknown", he is not a "non-public figure". The stub (as it stands right now) has more text in the 25 sources than in the actual article text. There is no valid reason for someone this prominent to have their article deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: I hope that anyone voting to keep the article is not doing so despite the situation - being that there is a COI with the article, potential sockfarm, and now the subject of the article requesting deletion and maybe trying to keep the article to prove a point. Yes, I am assuming good faith, but I am also tackling the elephant in the room so sorry if anyone is offended. Saying that he is "clearly notable" and "in the public eye" is not good enough as there is no notability guideline that states someone is notable based on being in the "public eye." With that, I will say that he has coverage in many reliable sources. However, many of it is quotes, passing mentions, podcasts or webcasts. Nothing that I believe would qualify him under , but I will abstain for the moment to see if anyone is able to show me otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)