Deletion of Pamela L. Johnson

Comment: She does pass . The article seems a bit bias though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: as I'm undecided): there don't seem to be many news articles about Johnson outside of four WaPo articles, part of a series on similar cases, where she is used as an egregious example. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44899-2005Apr11.htmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42456-2005Apr10.htmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A44902-2005Apr11.htmlhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/14/AR2005071401844.html  I think this does suffice per , but there's a problem with so many primary references being used and some of the language isn't as careful as it should be per . I certainly ''hope'' in the larger scheme of things that being run out of four states is unusual enough that this makes her notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP)