Deletion of Tri-Valley Community Television

Comment: the lengthy staff and small award sections should be deleted, since none of the content in either section is notable, and I marked three dead links, but the minor coverage that's there just barely meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: just to clarify, 's provisions for television stations being presumed notable if they produce original content are meant for FCC-licensed terrestrial stations, not cable public access stations. Cable public access stations have their own ''separate'' provision in NMEDIA, which is that they do ''not'' get an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, and instead have to actually be sourceable over  — in the absence of an FCC license, an operation like this doesn't get an automatic presumption of notability just because it technically meets one of the other criteria for the notability of television stations, because it doesn't meet ''all'' of them. (By the same token, a Part 15 radio station can technically meet the "produces original programming" criterion as well, but it's not presumed notable on that basis alone, as it still fails at least one of the other base criteria: the holding of an FCC license.) A television or radio station needs to meet ''all'' of the criteria for the notability of broadcast stations, not just one or two of the four, to get an automatic presumption of notability — it has to be FCC-licensed ''and'' actually operational ''and'' an originator of standalone content ''and'' |reliably sourceable as meeting all three of those conditions, not just one or two of those things. But a station that fails one or more of the criteria ''can'' still be kept ''if'' it can be shown as the subject of enough media coverage to clear GNG. That said, the sourcing already here isn't that bad (except that the CNN citation isn't relevant to the station's notability or lack thereof, because it's not about the station but merely verifies an otherwise tangential fact about a former employee) — I'd still like to see a little bit more sourcing, if possible, before I'm entirely convinced, but it's already some distance down the path toward keepability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: It is in the gray area of Ghostbusters|"more of a guideline than a rule"  for "Public access cable stations" between State/NYC size and 50K population with just a "government access feed". I've added some RS, some of which could replace the "citation needed"s
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST)

Comment: May not meet  but  is more forgiving and subject appears to meet requirements of first and/or second-to-last  bullet points due to original content produced and large population served
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BCAST||WP:BCAST)