Deletion of The Adventures of Tintin: Breaking Free

Comment: I am a bit bemused as to why the negativity of the reviews would make the sources less important. It still passes , and  does not require positive press
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: its been sourced. Refer to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: With the greatest of respect this prod and and AFD are a clear demonstration of the way that  is poisoning wikipedia, providing a figleaf for removal of content that is not removable by any other means. I have a genuinely hard time believing this publication would not have been covered in critical publications or have received reviews in same. What makes it vulnerable is purely the relative obscurity of the subject, not the verifiability of it. In short no matter how good the sophistry used to argue for the deletion of this article, I would like to read evaluations of it's worth by those who have read the actual comic book. If people who have read the comic book say it is not worth a wikipedia entry, I will gladly vote for deletion. I can not in good conscience do so without such assurances. The rule should be, if in doubt, keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Appears to pass , as I don't find the sources to be trivial; appears to be an encyclopedic topic, and it's treated respectably in the article as it stands. I'm not utterly convinced that it is notable, but I am sufficiently convinced that I don't want to see the article vanish
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The many delete votes above are absolutely correct that  and  are "the very heart of the project," and that we should not keep an article with no third-party references that attest to impact or historical significance. I have, however, just added quotes and references from  ''The Times'', ''The Guardian'', and ''The Independent''. Hopefully that takes care of the basic sourcing and notability issues as far as all are concerned
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)