Deletion of Jan Rezab

Comment: This is clearly promotional. Should it come back created by a neutral third party I might be inclined to give it more credence. I admit that the unbounded and continued promotion by the creator/autobiographer, in spite of clear statements relating to WP policy, make this very hard to accept. The same person has created an extensive article for the company. It amazes me that someone is unable to understand the deep insult that these articles deliver to those of us who see WP as a source of neutral information, not for personal promotion. I think this should be deleted under . I also think we ought to watch these articles because anyone so unable to read WP's culture would also be likely to hire out the promotion if it fails under his own name. Honestly, it's offensive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: I'll get to Rezab's comments in a second, but only in extreme cases should an article be deleted based on intent. In this case, sources do not meet notability guidelines, and are mostly flimsy PR and churnalism used as . Many of the sources don't even mention Rezab at all. The ''Forbes'' thing is puff. It's a listicle which is widely abused to suggest notability, but is a very poor indicator. It's divided into 20 subcategories, making for 600 entries a year, and reliable comments about the list itself are thin. The article could be used as a source itself, but it says almost nothing. Just mentioning the listing is not informative, and further supports that this is based more on self-promotion than being neutral and informative
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:BOMBARDMENT)