Deletion of Atheist-terrorism

Comment: Chock full of |OR, factually inaccurate (Godwin's Law|invokes Hitler as an example of an "atheist" for one), all inherently POV with no possibility of recovery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Original research; 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: In accordance with DLXs reasoning. The mere title of the article is |POV. The various organizations themselves already have articles outlining their agendas this kind of grouping and labeling is not encyclopedic. Of course the same could possibly be said about the "muslim terrorism" article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as probable |orginal research. If it is not original research, it most certainly fails the policy on |attribution
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:ATT)

Comment: as |original research; the article defines a term and synthesizes facts without attribution to reliable sources. Google returns only http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Atheist+terrorism%22 164 hits for "Atheist-terrorism", nearly all of them |self-published (e.g., blogs and forum posts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SPS)

Comment: Most ridiculus article ever sighted that doesn't have anyhthing with atheism to do. Renaming the article to something else doesn't seem to make any good use either as nothing is related to anything. Article is majorly ,  and  hence beyond repair
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:V)

Comment: as well, per above. Extremely NPOV, not to mention violating 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)