Deletion of The Adventures of Paddington Bear

Comment: per , TV shows which have aired nationally are generally kept, and there seems to be no real inclination to change that trend, no matter how much we all agree that this article needs cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: The article needs expansion, but it definitely meets . By the way, why doesn't this discussion show up on the main AfD page? '''Erpert
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Poorly written" is not a proper rationale at all, and I am seeing absolutely no issues with the text (if there is, |fix it). It's plain, but it works. And any children's program which airs on several international networks for over 100 episodes always has plenty of notability. Finally the Wikimedia servers aren't groaning from the weight of this properly written 4kb stub, so there is no such wasting of space
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:SOFIXIT)

Comment: Seems like a case of  to me, rather than an assertion that the topic isn't notable under Wikipedia's broad standards.  Generally, any television series that was picked up and shown a nationwide network, whether on broadcast or cable, would be considered notable as long as its existence is verifiable.  In this case, there would have been the additional requirement of purchasing the rights to make a series based on Paddington Bear.  While individual episodes of a TV series are held to a much stricter standard, a series itself is notable, and a stub article is acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)