Deletion of To Market, to Market (M*A*S*H) (2nd nomination)

Comment: There's a reason time is left between nominations and a random check on one episode showed plenty of sources to meet the  thus meeting notability criteria. If you still think they should be condensed into the season articles, then you should be aiming for a redirect instead of full deletion since the episode titles are going to be the likely search terms
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Each episode has significant independent coverage and thus meets .  Many of the listed episodes have mulitple independent sources referenced within the article itself.  And, as is acknowledged in the nomination, some of the listed episodes won awards.  The episodes are all notable and thus should be kept.  And I question the purpose of a 2nd AFD just days after the 1st AFDs for many of these episodes were concluded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per 2 weeks is hardly enough time to |improve the articles in the |time frame allowed by Wikipedia, and flys in the face of policy itself granting that Wkipedia is |imperfect and does not expect to be, and acts contrary to the |policies |dedicated to |building an encyclopedia. The nom might have sought a DVR had he thought the closer 2 weeks ago was wrong, but simply diagreeing with the consensus is no reason to nominate over and over until one gets the results one personally wishes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPROVE||WP:DEADLINE||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD||WP:IMPROVE)