Deletion of Energy-Safety and Energy-Economy (journal)

Comment: It meets |notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The discussion about what kind of database inclusion is required is irrelevant and misleading. Per , what we require for inclusion is substantial coverage in reliable sources, because otherwise we have nothing to base our article on, and such coverage is not attested here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not a single claim made in the article on this non-notable journal is backed by a reliable source and it's evident that the reason for that is the absence of reliable sources that we could use. It's |too soon for ''Energy-Safety and Energy-Economy'' to have an article on the English Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: It meets |Notability and the journal is reliable, as well as generating ~23,900,000 results on Google, (using query "Energy-Safety and Energy-Economy")  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)