Deletion of Cloudbuster

Comment: to Orgone. No suitably sourced material on this page to merge, and contains , so the page could just be deleted and then the redirect placed. Maybe dab with the more famous Kate Bush song
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: im the article creator, and to tell you the truth I created this article over 2 years ago. I don't rememeber if I had any better sources than the ones on this page now; i have not edited it for such a long time and I dont feel motivated to do any research. I have no objections or aguments against deleting this article based on the nominators reasoning re: lack of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: to Orgone, omitting the obvious  and sourcing the little bit that is left (''delete'' would be fine if I/anybody do/es not find any sources before this discussion closes). This application can be treated perfectly adequately at the parent concept. Spot-checking the archives did not reveal a better version, though there was some mention of a Rolf Alexander
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Whether it's real or not, this device is ''well known'' enough to have appeared in the song and movie, and as such it stands up independent of the main article on the orgone theory.  It is also described in Martin Gardner's ''Fads and Fallacies'' book IIRC.  An unreferenced but improveable article on a valid subject: this nomination strikes me as an ultimatum to improve it or else, and there is |no deadline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)