Deletion of Marianne Burgman

Comment: I'm not aware of any notability guideline in this context that requires us to ignore routine and/or local coverage. (The only possibilities are , which applies only to corporations, and , which applies only to events.) The question that the GNG is asking is essentially "can I write a policy-compliant non-stub article with this coverage?" and the answer to that question is clearly "yes" in light of the good deal of coverage that's been found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: just the coverage you'd expect of any small town mayor. Does not meet either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Per references and other sources, clearly meets the requirements of  #2 and the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: does not pass  and I don’t see what else would make the subject notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Failure of  and the obituaries don't show any accomplishments that would make her an exception to the non-notability of mayors. She did resign because of some local mismanagement, but there's no coverage beyond what is to be expected from a small-town mayor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)