Deletion of CyborgLog

Comment: I've added some specific papers to the external links sections which EXPLICITLY use the word Glogging! And one isn't written by Mann or has Mann as a co author. It is in a trustable trade journal, IEEE Multimedia and is a reliable secondary source. This combined with all the peer reviewed work makes this term both |verifiable and |reliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: CARPE2004 Schedule page you privided a link to does not have the word "CyborgLog" in it. Until now it only fails , ,  and I could go on by pointing you to the risible amount (around 400) of unsimilar results on google, all of which are from blogs or blogspam
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: passes  and . There are secondary sources there are communities interested in it, there are even ACM conferences associated with it. Did anyone actually look at the references? Having a workshop. For instance look at the workshop articles listed:http://research.microsoft.com/CARPE2004/schedule.htm CARPE2004 Schedule. I don't think I'm going against any policy by voting keep w.r.t  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS)