Deletion of Pyro Desktop (2nd nomination)

Comment: All I can find is three sources (all from 2007), that are already in the article - Desktop Linux, arstechnica and what appears to be the Polish version of PC World. Looking at the dates and structure of the first and third, my cynical side suggests they have been recycled from the same press release. I'm inclined to suggest such sparse coverage stretches  to breaking point. As for a merge, I have serious concerns about the Chris Toshok article. The article is an unsourced .  The subject himself appears to be of marginal notability. In my opinion the only thing saving that article from an abrupt trip to AfD itself is not mentioned in the article http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3414157.stm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP)

Comment: to Web operating system. Although the references are convincing that it is worth of mention, the project itself seems to be dead and indeed all the sources report the same GUADEC presentation. Though right now the proposed target page is a mess, the concept of operating system as a bootable browser was and still is fairly popular, and it even has notable implementations: Google Chrome OS and webOS. So the target can be converted to the article, dedicated to the concept and |verifiable attempts at implementation, thus serving a background for both notable implementations. &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)