Deletion of Freakum Dress (3rd nomination)

Comment: could not find evidence that there is coverage (charting/cover versions...) independent of the album. A whole lot of |puffery for one song.--Special:Contributions/70.80.234.196|70.80.234.196
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipuffery (WP:PUFF)

Comment: Per Theuhohreo's statements. It's not just some "album track." Besides, , it's a great addition to wikipedia and should not be kept back for any reason
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Just so we are clear, i was asked to comment http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AL-l-CLK-l-l&action=historysubmit&diff=407345489&oldid=406793139 here. With that said it was a neutral comment asking for opinion, wasnt a canvas violation. Okay, so back to this article,  has been cited for the deletion, although i agree with this rule i also disagree due to inconsistency on wikipedia. What i mean is, according to , "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." Charting is not ''always'' a necessity in establishing notability, in this case, this is a well written article that has received a fair amount of coverage. Im leaning more towards keep but not enough to say keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Personally I think that the "needs to chart" and other matter of  is crap. This article meets the . In spite of , see "Suga Mama" and "Slug (song)|Slug", neither of which have charted or meet any of the NSONGS junk, but both are GAs (and the latter has been to FAC). This is a great, informative addition to Wikipedia and it would be a shame to see it deleted IMHO
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:GNG||WP:OTHERCRAP)