Deletion of Ian Smith (minister)

Comment: per  #6, as the Presbyterian Theological Centre is in accredited institution in a country where accreditation is not given lightly; it offers recognised bachelor's and master's degrees (offering a "wide range of disciplines" is not part of , or we'd be forced to delete the article on the Dean of the Harvard Law School). -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.114|202.124.73.114
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Presbyterian Theological Centre is not a major academic institution, it is a small specialist training college for people wanting to do Christian ministry, and does not offer a wide range of disciplines. fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The nomination sounds a bit like . I don't think we're stretching  #6 to say that the subject passes those guidelines. The only point, as far as I can see, is whether the Presbyterian Theological Centre qualifies as a "major academic institution". Now, the number of students is not all that relevant - the significant thing is that it is one of three official seminaries of the Presbyterian Church of Australia. BUT if you look at the notes on the criteria of PROF #6, "if the person has held the post of President or Chancellor (or Vice-Chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university..." It puts the emphasis on accreditation. It ''does'' use the word "significant", but that is not well-defined, and I would suggest the PTC ''is'' significant. Hence, this passes Wikipedia:Notability (academics). It simply isn't good enough to say " is, as written, overbroad" - it is a notability guideline, not an essay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTBIGENOUGH||WP:PROF)