Deletion of Smelly socks

Comment: Fails .  The sources are more  and  than 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BOMBARD||WP:MASK||WP:RS)

Comment: this is ridiculous, and not a valid topic for an encyclopaedia (which is the point here). Per  and E this should be deleted and redirected to foot odour. This is trivial and pathetic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTE)

Comment: The topic is notable as demonstrated by the numerous sources about the highly distinctive odour of smelly socks.  Proposing deletion is therefore as absurd as proposing that we deleted other articles about other sensations such as Violet (color)|Violet, Umami or Sound of fingernails scraping chalkboard.  The nomination is self-contradictory in that it proposes that the article be deleted and then immediately counter-proposes that its content be merged.  It can't make its mind up whether the material is useful or trivial and mostly just splutters in outrage.  The nomination therefore fits  in being erroneous, harassing and vexatious
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: It was a nice little http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-joke1 joke but it's had its moment. Ultimately this is pure |trivia and the subject is covered properly at Foot odor. A |trout to CW for carrying on the joke too far
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:TROUT)

Comment: Funny article name, but it is indeed well reliably sourced (no  concerns at all) and much better than I could imagine given the topic. I'd say a good merge with Foot odor could be in the long term the best option, but in the meantime the article has no reasons to be deleted. About the trivia concern, it simply seems a case of the nominator not liking some of the article content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)