Deletion of London Buses route 80

Comment: Oops, missed this one. Essentially per BrownHairedGirl. |GNG is an important guideline and shouldn't discarded lightly.  It is important for good reason.  Without significant coverage in reliable sources, it is usually impossible to have an encyclopaedic article about a subject that is properly verified.  These bus route articles are a case in point: they are littered with original research and for all we know could be totally inaccurate.  The reason they are littered with original research is because the reliable sources aren't there.  For that reason, the original research is fatal and unsalvageable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Lots of coverage showing up, but nothing significant except in unreliable sources. I'm disappointed as the route seems to have some history behind it, but it doesn't seem close to meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Being a trivial thing that exists in a directory does not justify a stand alone article. See |not a directory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)