Deletion of Vito Di Bari

Comment: The only likely source of notability I see is .  That would generally require multiple book reviews in independent reliable sources, which aren't currently in the article.  Some reviews may also be published in Italian, which makes searching trickier
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: WP:PROMOTIONAL remains. For instance “Di Bari is internationally regarded as a creative innovator”. Also,  as it is sourced with links to his own YouTube account
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: The article does not meet any of the  criteria. First, the person doesn’t hold any prestigious appointment. He did not receive any Master or a Ph.D. The article claimed he was a Professor but  I wasn’t able to find any evidence of his academic position. So I assumed he was an adjunct. My edit was corrected in Academic ranks in Italy|contract professor by the same un-registered IP above. So, it is confirmed, he was a non-faculty and temporary staff in Italy a decade ago. Second, there are no scholarly publications. Just a few professional publications (published between 2000-2006) by a non-scholar Italian publisher. His work is not cited. Neither in Italian nor in English. The only information that I am able to verify is that he works as a keynote speaker. He is a “futurologist” and works with different agencies. Here is https://speaking.com/speakers/vito-di-bari/ one. The tone, the register of the article and the unsigned comment above make me think this article is s a self-biography with promotional intent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: To summarise: There is no . No multiple book reviews in independent reliable sources for . Sock puppets and anonymous IPs . Conflict of interest . Unverifiable references such as those from two Nobel laureates . Promotional language 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:SOCK||WP:COI||WP:NRV||WP:SPIP)

Comment: WP:TNT surely applies to this  article, which appears from its edit history to be mostly autobiography.  I also don't see notability: his books don't seem to have the reviews for , and there are no other signs of it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMOTIONAL||WP:NAUTHOR)