Deletion of Zunera Mazhar

Comment: A quick Google Search yields quite https://www.google.com/search?q=zunera+serena&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#tbm=nws&q=zunera+mazhar significant results. Definitely passes  and . The article itself is adequately referenced and I can see popular medica coverage in her home country and the US. Featured in top media outlets like CNN and the Express Tribune. The nominator should have a look over the references and their quality before nomination for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: or rather Burn it Down. I'm not a paid editor and I did not come here from a job board. The subject does not pass  which is the relevent criteria. Only the subject would hire people to vote on an AfD to protect her vanity article, so how about we  so it can't be recreated by this person and her paid minions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:SALT)

Comment: I looked at all the citations. IMO none is . A search turned up nothing better (although it did, perhaps unsurprisingly, turn up the usual pile of social sites). Fails , and I'll throw in  for good measure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:BIO||WP:PROMO)

Comment: I am responding to every single user who left their response. Please don't consider this disruption, all the concerns you have raised are addressed one by one below.
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:GF)

Comment: There are plenty of   &  sources quoted on the page & most are mainstream  of not one but two different countries(U.S & Pakistan). According to this guideline ->  the notability clearly exists as there are numerous  sources quoted. I am sure the administrators will take note of the crass language used in guise of unsubstantiated, unascertainable, mala fide & ridiculous claims. I will again exercise restraint & not invoke  but when my Talk page is littered with phony claims of Sock Puppetry which is a clear naked blatant violation of  I can't assume . I am glad that an investigation is requested to substantiate the sock puppetry claims & I can't wait for the results. Hope the discussion will be kept limited to merits of notability & reliability, now that the investigation re puppetry is ongoing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SECONDARY||WP:NEWSORG||WP:NEXIST||WP:RELIABLE||WP:HARASS||WP:HUSH||WP:GOODFAITH)