Deletion of Death of Christopher Lane

Comment: It's fairly clear by now that this went nowhere from an "enduring impact" perspective, and so fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Yes this was in the news, yes it was a terrible event, yes it has  coming out of its ears but these are |primary news reports not analytical coverage. As there is no lasting significance claimed or demonstrated it fails the inclusion policy  (which trumps all GNG arguments above).  According to various sources there are in excess of about 8k gun related deaths in the US each year or about 20 per day, what sets this one above all the rest in terms of its |lasting effect ?  If this could be demonstrated to have a impact on Australia–United States relations or be be a catalyst for yet another push on US gun control then that would be different, absent that WikiNews is that way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRIMARYNEWS||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING)

Comment: clear case of where  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Nothing to set it apart from most drivebys, except the victim was Australian. Giving that weight over cases of Americans being shot for fun isn't the |neutral thing, regardless of what newspapers do
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Significant coverage by reliable sources for several days now. Sufficiently notable for an article per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)