Deletion of Snowden Run 3D (2nd nomination)

Comment: When a video game is getting dedicated articles devoted to covering a video game, it easily meets the . I mean, there are high level sources covering this, like http://www.cbsnews.com/news/edward-snowden-cast-as-hero-in-smartphone-video-game-snowden-run-3d/ CBS and http://mexico.cnn.com/tecnologia/2013/08/01/un-nuevo-videojuego-ayuda-a-edward-snowden-a-robar-informacion CNN. Not passing mentions, but full articles on it. Sure, Reviews/Reception are a ''common'' path to meeting the GNG, but they're certainly not the ''only'' way. Is it a terrible, cookie-cutter game? Probably. |But it doesn't matter, because that's not a reason to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I have completely reorganized and rewritten the article to demonstrate that it meets the . It no longer looks like garbage, and has been expanded to just more than a stub currently. (Side note: So the arguments don't go there down the road, my motivations to save the article are not politically based at all. I'm largely indifferent there. I'm motivated to save something related to video games and parody, that's all
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)