Deletion of Alejandra Campoverdi

Comment: The subject was profiled in the New York Times Magazine and LatinoMagazine prior to the campaign for Congress. While those features, in and of themselves, would not meet a  pass, with failed candidates for public office, the test for notability should include the totality of circumstance. And while for most failed candidates, the campaign coverage is routine and the community has considered individuals running in a campaign within the context of  (i.e. the election contest is notable, but the individuals are notable only in the contest of the election), in this circumstance, there is a) prior coverage of the subject in national newspapers, and b) there is national news coverage of the subject as a candidate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: All of but one of your links are related to her failed election campaign: that is classic  ( might also be a factor). Being a healthcare advocate, a former White House staffer, and a former media executive do not confer notability in and of themselves, not even in the aggregate. Just because the links are to significant bios about the candidacy doesn't make her notable; otherwise, candidates in many competitive races would be automatically notable simply due to the amount of coverage, which is not the case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if you cannot show and reliably source that she was already eligible for a Wikipedia article for some other reason ''before'' running as a candidate, then she has to ''win'' the election to get a Wikipedia article because election — and the volume of media coverage being shown is ''not'' enough to make her the rare Christine O'Donnell exception where the candidacy coverage turned into a shitstorm that made her an international household name that virtually everybody still instantly recognizes almost |ten years later
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)

Comment: I think the depth of coverage (Glamour, WaPo, LA Times) meets . &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)