Deletion of Dorothy King

Comment: Easilly passes  with multiple reliable sources running dedicated features on the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Clearly notable per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: Seems to have made enough of a splash outside academia (cf  point 7
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: If this thing |snowballs as expected, I hope that if the notability tag returns anyone who removes it can just point to this discussion. To answer DreamGuy, the article has multiple sources that are reliable (BBC News, The Independent, CBC News, The New Republic, The Guardian) and give substantial coverage (the BBC News article is pretty long and wholly about her, The Independent and The Guardian reviewed her book in-depth, and CBC News quoted King throughout the entire article about the Elgin Marbles). I would say that satisfies  well enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:N)