Deletion of Eternal Sacred Order of Cherubim and Seraphim

Comment: There is no intention to  (and I haven't done anything that would constitute a bite), although I'm increasingly seeing this guideline trotted out and put ahead of policy. As far as I'm aware  isn't about ignoring policy just because somebody is new (do we perhaps allow every newcomer to create three junk articles that we don't delete?). If a newcomer creates an article that ought to be deleted, and which cannot sensibly be moved to user space, it should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:BITE)

Comment: I fail to see any  issues in my remark on the article talk page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: It is not about "ignoring policy" or not deleting "junk articles", neither of which are being advocated here. People are throwing  at you, not because you are trigger-happy and have nominated too early without doing any legwork, but because of the tone of your reply to the article's creator on its Talk:Eternal Sacred Order of Cherubim and Seraphim|Talk page. If this is your normal approach to new editors, then you will be seeing  mentioned a great deal - so you may as well take it on board now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE||WP:BITE)