Deletion of San Francisco Giants minor league players

Comment: on a y nomination, per Dirtlawyer1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: The listed minor league baseball players are those who have been determined to be of some measure of notability under the general notability guidelines per , but WP:BASEBALL and the larger community believe would be better served by inclusion in an "incubator" list article such as this one.  '''''The Wikipedia community, WP:BASEBALL, and/or the participants in this AfD may "conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article," and that the subject matter may be better covered as part of another article''''' per GNG.  This is just such a case, and well supported by the long-standing consensus of WP:BASEBALL, and several years of consistent AfD outcomes: '''KEEP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Alex is being y and I've already ed him. We have a long standing consensus on how to do this that he doesn't seem to comprehend, and now he's wasting our time and resources on this farce. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:TROUT)

Comment: This is explicitly a compendium of half-baked |BLPs.  They are "select" but this selection seems to be done by Wikipedia editors rather than independent reliable sources.   If the players are notable they should have proper, enduring articles rather than this |directory-style ephemera.  Our BLP requirements are quite strict and so should not be fudged in this way.  Note that I'm probably going to repeat this rationale in all the other similar discussions (which should have been done together as a group).  I'll do that later as it will be quite a chore - the sort of tedious activity which has killed AFD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTDIR)