Deletion of Dilemma of determinism (2nd nomination)

Comment: I have read the previous AfD and the arguments given therein, yet I do not believe it to be a walled garden topic. There exists such a philosophical term as per the {{Find sources AFD|Dilemma of determinism}}) hits, which is not fully covered in determinism. I have seen worse. Still, it contains too much  and is simply too badly written. If the article was shortened and the quotes pruned, I would change my vote to Weak Keep. I am also worried by the likely sock puppetry of the pro-keep editors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Haven't made up my mind on this one, but three quick comments about above !votes. {{ping|Zaratustra}} I think you'll need to do more than show use of the term to convince people. To what extent is this a distinct topic that couldn't/shouldn't be covered in one of the other existing articles? {{ping|Zezen}} Per , {{tq|If the article was shortened and the quotes pruned, I would change my vote to Week keep}} means you should really be !voting weak keep to begin with (i.e. if the topic is notable and there's a workable article hiding inside the current article, that's all that matters). {{ping|Snowded}} I do remember Cmsreview and his articles, but where did you see a ban? He has no block log and no mention of it on his talk page. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)