Deletion of Ganesh Chandrasekaran

Comment: Insufficient coverage of any depth or |peristence in |reliable sources to pass the basic requirements of : There are solely |passing mentions in https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ganesh+Chandrasekaran%22&client=firefox-b&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjSl_uT_IXdAhXCBcAKHRRmDeYQ_AUICigB&biw=1600&bih=805 news outlets, and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ganesh+Chandrasekaran%22&client=firefox-b&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj0qcmV_IXdAhUcOsAKHedZBowQ_AUIECgB&biw=1600&bih=805&dpr=1.2 even less in the literature. As touched on in the nomination, what coverage the subject does receive is second-hand and not discussing him directly. "Too soon", perhaps, as we might say elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO||WP:TRIVIALMENTION)