Deletion of Academic Journals Database

Comment: The subject is significantly covered in secondary sources, mostly academic journals, while some just recognises it, others wrote about it in detail, but mostly in Spanish.  clearly says "the evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or ''recognition''". The many links and references were added by other editors as a result of
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE)

Comment: in , an important point is that "Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. That excludes the citations that simply mention the database. And other sources that do nothing but repeat the information on the "About" page can hardly be called "Independent
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I was unable to find any reliable third-party resources that provide details about this resource per .  I do think that the website is potentially valuable to researchers, but that doesn't make it notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. The "About" page (and its reproductions) is not enough to imply notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)