Deletion of List of tattoo TV shows

Comment: per  and  as navigational index; we clearly have plenty of articles on TV series that are about tattooing, as seen by the contents of this list as well as :Category:Tattooing television series and its subcategory :Category:Television series set in tattoo shops. The nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: I think this is a keep based on : ''"Accordingly, these methods should not be considered in conflict with each other. Rather, they are synergistic, each one complementing the others"'' It doesn't mean it must be kept, but it does state: ''"Consider that lists may include features not available to categories, and building a rudimentary list of links is a useful step in improving a list. Deleting these rudimentary lists is a waste of these building blocks"'' There isn't a time limit on it and someone may decide to build on this. Since its a legitimate list per  it has been discussed in pop culture press https://www.inkedmag.com/tattoo-artists/16-canceled-tattoo-tv-shows-you-should-binge-watch-this-weekend, https://tv.avclub.com/every-show-about-tattooing-reviewed-1798271539, https://www.vulture.com/2014/01/guide-to-tv-current-tattoo-obsession.html, https://www.insider.com/tattoo-historian-rates-movies-tv-shows-blade-aquaman-joker-2020-3, and I don't see why I should be deleted when  says ''"Deleting these rudimentary lists is a waste of these building blocks"'' &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:LISTN||WP:CLN)

Comment: Being six years old is not a reason to delete. Nom needs to stop citing this as a reason, and consider that if most of their nominated lists are being kept, they might not share the consensus interpretation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)