Deletion of Algolia

Comment: Dedicated articles at Forbes (yes, FORBES!), Market Wired, Tech Crunch, Venture Beat. Interviews at Stack Share and profiled at Crunch Base.  Coverage is international. There is more, but that is more than enough to justify its existence.  Easily meets  for  alone. Statements of promotional tone were questionable at best, and certainly not unambiguous enough for a Speedy Delete request.  Recommend a serving of  to go with a  keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TROUT||WP:SNOW)

Comment: The Forbes article appears to be a blog post, but I'd argue that it, along with the TechCrunch and VentureBeat material, are enough to establish it as notable. Moreover, while the article does display a bit of puffery, it doesn't come close to being a page that is |''exclusively'' promotional, and would need to be ''fundamentally'' rewritten to become encyclopedic (emphasis in original
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11)