Deletion of Beer hall

Comment: obviously a  fail.  to nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:TROUT)

Comment: A notable topic that passes . See below for a sampling of available sources; more in addition to this are available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Reliable sources have been found proving it passes the general notability guidelines, and the article has been massively expanded since the time it was nominated for deletion.  Also click Google news at the top of the AFD, and the first page of results has a New York Times article discussing first a single Beer Hall, then the Beer Hall in general. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/world/europe/germany-beer-halls.html  Please remember to do a brief check for sources  nominating something for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: sourcing listed by Northamerica1000 clearly indicate notability, as do other articles like https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/envispacplac.3.2.0097?seq=1 " The German Beer Hall as Place of Cultural Performance", Whelan, Debbie (2015). "eMatsheni: The central beer hall as social and municipal infrastructure in twentieth century Pietermaritzburg". ''Historia (Three Rivers)'' (0018-229X), 60 (1), p. 75., and more. Further, a valid rationale for deletion is not presented: |Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: sourcing listed by Northamerica1000 clearly indicate notability.  AFD not cleanup.  No compliance with efore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)