Deletion of Game of Thrones title sequence (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nominator suggests it is not notable, and that it qualifies as . While I agree that winning an Emmy does not alone make this topic notable, the many many secondary sources in the article and referenced above certainly ensures the topic clears the notability bar. Whether or not it is fancruft is immaterial. The fancruft essay (not a policy document) explains many common problems with articles that are written by 'fans' of a topic.  Even if I were to grant the fact that in this article there are too many tables and too much detail (which I am not convinced of), then that is problem best addressed by edits and on the talk page, not by deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: Yes, the Emmy award does suggests that it has individual notability, and the title sequence has received widespread non-trivial media coverage, also parodied and adapted (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11894418, http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/game-thrones-map-title-sequence-season-article-1.2227148, https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/jan/25/transparent-to-game-of-thrones-how-tv-perfected-the-title-sequence, http://www.esquire.com/entertainment/news/a46222/opening-credits-of-the-game-of-thrones-finale/, https://au.be.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv/a/36477872/hidden-detail-in-season-7-game-of-thrones-credits-contains-clue/, https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/08/game-of-thrones-westworld-the-crown-opening-titles-elastic, http://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/832445/Game-of-Thrones-season-7-Opening-credits-changed-White-Walker-warning-Stormborn-HBO, http://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/entertainment/a10355400/game-of-thrones-opening-credits-clue/, http://screenrant.com/game-of-thrones-white-walkers-wall-breach-theory/, http://io9.gizmodo.com/5890410/watch-the-simpsons-game-of-thrones-intro, http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/entertainment/2017/08/carpool-karaoke-goes-full-game-of-thrones-in-intro-for-sophie-turner-maisie-williams.html, https://www.newyorker.com/news/sporting-scene/looking-ahead-to-the-english-premier-leagues-game-of-thrones in addition to some already given above and many more). These two facts should qualified the article under notability criteria - there is no specific notability guideline for title sequence, although winning a major award and having non-trivial coverage in reliable sources are the usual notability criteria for articles on various media such as music, TV, film and other related subjects, see e.g. , , etc. The article however needs more sources, and it could be trimmed, but these are different issues not relevant here because the notability criteria have been satisfied. Whether other title sequences that won award also have their own articles or not is also irrelevant (there is for example one for The Simpsons opening sequence|The Simpsons), the notability of each article is judged on its own. It should be noted that  is an essay and not Wikipedia policy or guideline, and reason for deletion should be discussed in reference to -REASON or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMEDIA||WP:NMUSIC||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:DEL||WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)