Deletion of Article 74(Constitution of India)

Comment: of course. I am scratching my head at the logic of the nominating statement. The nominator sees, "no other page existing that is about a specific article of the Indian constitution". So the proposed solution to fix this |lacunae on wikipedia is to delete the article that ''has'' been created. Wow! The notability of this article is |not in doubt, as can be seen by numerous books and papers on Google books/scholars that discuss it - even though India law is ''vastly underrepresented'' on both (because most of these works are published by Indian publishers or GoI press). In particular, http://books.google.com/books?id=nvzcy7o4sgAC&pg=PA94& ''Indian public administration: institutions and issues'' by  Ramesh Kumar Arora and  Rajni Goyal spends 3 pages discussing just the "aid and advice" phrase in the article's language. Constitutional scholar Durga Das Basu analyzes the article in his ''Constitutional law of India'' and other works. The article needs to be expanded to include the analysis, as well as the motivation and effect of the 42nd and the 44th amendments, but deletion is not at all warranted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There's no reason in theory or practice a single article of a constitution can't have its own page (as Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution|here or Section_109_of_the_Australian_Constitution|here).  The requirement, as in all things, is that of |the general notability guidelines - significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources.  Given that this is the constitution of India|one of the world's most heavily populated countries, and that Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_India|the process for changing the constitution is far from trivial, yet Forty-second_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_India|an amendment was passed specifically to change this article, there are without doubt an incredible number of foreign-language sources establishing notability.  Difficulty in English-speakers finding them is not a reason to delete an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)