Deletion of Huma Abedin (3rd nomination)

Comment: per the first response. Abedin is internationally notable in a heartbeat, and it isn't out of ignorance of the sources that this got nominated. This is a  violation fair and square
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Well-sourced and clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Independently well known individual with significant mainstream media coverage. Satisfies  with ease. Not even sure why this keeps being nominated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I have looked through the sources that are currently in the article.  There are multiple sources that provide significant coverage of her that meets the intent of the |general notability guideline.  I do not see any reason to delete this article, it might need work to clean it up but deletion is not the solution.  --&nbsp;:en
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Obvious keep per  and a glance at the refs. Articles are not deleted because negative coatracking is removed, however, editors can be sanctioned for |pointy behavior regarding a BLP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POINT)

Comment: SNOW Close''', and possibly sanction this user. The subject of the article is notable by a mile, and the nominator knows it. AfD is not the place to address perceived article bias, or the conservative editors' complaints that additions of tangential material that may be negative towards Hillary Clinton is being reverted by those of us who are trying to keep this from becoming the http://www.conservapedia.com/Huma_Abedin "Conservapedia" version of what this article should be. User is , disrupting Wikipedia to push their conservative POV. Discussion on the article's talk page hasn't gotten us far, hence this. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)

Comment: This is a textbook example of a notable figure. I can't see how this person doesn't meet . As for the argument that the BLP is "too brief", this article is much more in depth then a lot of other BLP on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)