Deletion of Tantric sexuality

Comment: and the current title is probably the "most common" in English per . There are http://books.google.com/books?um=1&tab=wp&client=firefox-a&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&q=tantric.sexuality 75 books that reference the phrase, and http://books.google.com/books?um=1&client=firefox-a&q=tantric.sex&btnG=Search+Books 587 using "tantric sex", including ''The Complete Idiot's Guide to Tantric Sex'', so this is not a non-notable or obscure concept. I have never heard of neotantra and that article in fact reads like a criticism section that belongs in tantric sexuality, i.e. some attempt to reclaim the true religious practice in a Western context. In any case, it's certainly more obscure than tantric sex, which is discussed in books, http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&client=firefox-a&q=tantric.sex&tab=pn&ie=ISO-8859-1 newspapers, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=kJ8&q=site%3Amsnbc.msn.com+tantric+sex&btnG=Search television and radio, even if the name is inaccurate according to Hindu tradition. This article does not have inline citations, but it does have references, and asking for those references to be incorporated into the article according to 2007 Wikipedia norms is certainly welcome. But deleting the article on that basis is not warranted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NC)