Deletion of Rainbow Lounge raid

Comment: Article is about the event, not the bar... so we should follow whatever the going standard is for articles about events (will defer to more knowledgeable editors there). |Recentism by itself is not a reason for deletion (at least according to the essay). By Wikipedia standards: the bar is not notable, nor would be the event by itself (if it had stopped there). What would make it notable is the public's reaction to it, which led to the NY Times and LA Times reporting the story
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: It may not survive the test of time but, for now, it is |notable and has had non-trivial coverage in multiple |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: for the time being, but watch; the news may fizzle out . This event has been fairly well covered in the press since it occurred . I have seen a lot of discussions in blogs and the like .  It is certainly not .  -- Scheaffer Sirls
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: for now.  The bar may not be notable, but the event seems to have |enough |coverage for inclusion.  I say we reserve judgement for later, i.e., when more information is in the article - but even then, with the links, I think we've got a keeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)