Deletion of DataXu

Comment: The sources cited are more than enough to establish notability. However this seems to be a clear case of  so I'm going to add the appropriate template to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:CONFLICT)

Comment: Satisfies : Independent coverage is significant: e.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22DataXu%22&tbm=nws&gws_rd=ssl 65 hits in Google news from what can be considered reliable sources such as Forbes (e.g. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2014/06/09/interview-with-mike-baker-of-dataxu/ this interview), Business Insider (e.g. http://www.businessinsider.com/dataxu-ipo-2013-12 this article),  Yahoo News, and Forrester Research (e.g. http://www.forrester.com/The+Forrester+Wave+DemandSide+Platforms+Q4+2011/fulltext/-/E-RES59169?objectid=RES59169 this research report). The company has won one notable award (#5 fastest growing company in the US in 2013, which can be verified http://www.inc.com/inc5000/list/2013/ here). Some of the competitors listed such as MediaMath with similar coverage and revelance (e.g. as per the http://www.forrester.com/The+Forrester+Wave+DemandSide+Platforms+Q4+2011/fulltext/-/E-RES59169?objectid=RES59169 Forrester Research report) have an article already. I do not see this article as ; the article language is not sales-oriented nor it has an advertising tone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY||WP:ADMASQ)