Deletion of War on Terrorism casualties

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: those voicing delete and merge opinions raise concerns with some validity.  ''"War on terror"'' is an amorphous term.  Additionally, it is a term the Bush Presidency stopped using, and which the Obama Presidency has never used.  So the term is of historical, not current interest.  On the other hand, how is merging this article into War on terror#casualties an improvement?  Once merged ''"war on terror"'' remains amorphous, and of historical interest, since no official body uses the term any more.  War on terror#casualties directs readers to Casualties of the Iraq War and Civilian casualties of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present).  These are more clearly defined areas -- less amorphous than ''"war on terror"''.  IMO whether the central discussion remains in this article, or at War on terror#casualties I think it would be best if it quotes some  about the problems of defining ''"war on terror"'', and then directs readers to the more specific articles.  In addition to casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan ''"casualties of the war on terror"'' could include
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: a nice idea in theory, but in practice this is almost certain to stay a POV  just as it is now. There is no clear criteria and will probably never be a consensus as to what constitutes an event in the so-called "War on Terror", so I think this article is just going to end up as an ongoing headache for everybody concerned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: WP:SYNTH, ,  (War on Terrorism#Casualties) and #STATS, all combined in one. The article's conclusions are not supported by its sources. For example the so-called sources for the claim that the War on Terror killed 1,561 Colombians are: "7 Colombian soldiers killed by Colombian rebels' landmines", "Colombia police seek rebels after bomb kills 15 elite troops", "Colombia's President Vows to Eradicate Coca Plants . . . after rebel forces killed 29 soldiers standing guard as workers destroyed coca crops", and two nonexisting HTTP 404|404 pages. Considering that the article contains little but dry statistics and most of these statistics are misrepresented or downright false, I see nothing here that could justify this separate treatment of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:POVFORK||WP:NOT)