Deletion of Dalia Danish

Comment: To all IPs and new users coming in: This is not decided on a vote and all arguments must fall within the rules of . We don't keep articles because they're related to someone notable (), it has something that "totally should be highlighted" (), or anything that falls under . Even if a billion people come in to say it should be kept, if none of those arguments show notability for Danish per notability guidelines, then they won't really do anything. Also be aware that you should only vote once. I'm striking the second "keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:VALINFO||WP:AADD)

Comment: it is not promotional fluff. Dalia is the first to create an arabic self help site -- interactive- www.tammenny.com based on her knowledge of interactive learning aquired at max planck and applied i cambridge -- downing college-. she is the only neuroscience specialist in the region and the only arabic speaking downing college cambridge graduate who integrated neuroscience knowlege and created this free site. I have read the (), ,  () etc and objectively see that she fits the criteria. it's all up to you. I am more than happy to flag egyptian practicioners who are currently using wiki as promotional fluff and do NOT belong to any accredited uni or syndicate who even have fake online Phd's listed as their credential. This is really unfortunate. I wish you all a fantastic holidaySpecial:Contributions/196.202.96.170|196.202.96.170
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:VALINFO)

Comment: I see where she's quoted in Egypt Today (http://www.egypttoday.com/news/display/article/artId:884/Shattering-the-Body-Image-Myth/secId:60), but nothing to show that she's particularly noteworthy or notable enough to pass . Her papers or articles might be usable as a reliable source in other Wikipedia articles, but being enough of an authority to be considered a reliable source is not enough to pass notability guidelines. Publishing articles in papers or any journal entry is not enough to show notability. As someone said in another AfD, scientists/doctors/PhD people are expected to publish papers and journals. It's the nature of the beast and the epitome of the phrase "publish or perish". However it's only when those sources are consistently quoted as being especially groundbreaking or THE source for whatever the specific scientist/doctor is known for, then journals or articles alone might be enough. However there is nothing out there to suggest that this is the case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)