Deletion of Christine Stephens

Comment: Passes #C1 as argued above, after removing anomalous results. (And being https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1359105310368178 guest editor of a journal issue is itself, I'd say, a point in an academic's favor. Not enough for #C8 by itself, of course, but still a positive datum
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Well, the anomalous articles seem to be from the same issue of the same journal, and two more clicks show that she was the guest editor of that issue. So Google Scholar erroneously read guest editorship as authorship. But take all those away and there's still, what, over 4000 citations to her work? Is that right? And that's not enough for #C1? Tough crowd
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: She easily passes multiple  criteria, including #C1 (at least well over 4000 citations in Google Scholar regardless of any anomalies regarding two of the articles in a journal issue she edited) and #C5 by holding the highest academic rank in New Zealand which is the closest thing NZ has to distinguished professor. Especially in combination her notability is fairly evident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: per #C1 as seen on Google Scholar search https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=a8KaWA8AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao. I count 6 papers with over 100 citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)