Deletion of Alistair Katt

Comment: per nom. Unreasonably fine granularity. If the descriptions in Newshounds aren't considered detailed enough, there's plenty of room to add detail there. Spot-checking several of these articles shows no sources for the specific details given. They give the appearance of being a display of personal knowledge, included on the editor's own authority, rather than being based on cited, verifiable published sources (as required by the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per well reasoned nom, this does not satisfy either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: since these characters are a subset of a webcomic (which is less notable than a comic) and is in any case a furry webcomic (which is a minor subgenre).  No evidence of significant external coverage (is this  from fans
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)