Deletion of Charlotte Cleverley-Bisman

Comment: a quadruple amputee's continuing progress and development would seem as encyclopedic in general as Helen Keller dealing with blindness and deafness, or the Dionne quintuplets dealing with being part of a multiple birth. Continuing in depth coverage in multiple national publications satisfies  and trumps an editor feeling that a medical condition just isn't important, or their noting that lots of people are multiple amputees. I can find no policy justifying deletion on such arguments. This article seems to fit in criterion 2 of the essay OTNEWS " causing a notable change in societal behaviour or norms, etc." by serving as the face of the vaccination campaign, in the same way the an otherwise nonnotable injured animal was notable as Smokey  bear , the face of preventing forest fires in the US, during his lifetime from 1950-1975
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: this has snowballed by now. Notable person, passes , meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)