Deletion of Program on Forests

Comment: A basic  search would have suggested to the nom that the subject was notable (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Program+on+Forests%22&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjX-8mYqa_YAhWEfFAKHXxWBR4Q_AUICigB&biw=1440&bih=726 plenty of coverage- both |in-depth and |persistent- in |reliable, |independent sources, as well as in the https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Program+on+Forests%22&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQ88maqa_YAhXHmLQKHdReCxcQ_AUIECgB&biw=1440&bih=726&dpr=1.33 relevant literature). Indeed, as a World Bank program, it would perhaps be odd if it was not. Yes the article could do with tidying up (and doubtless undergoing expansion, as there is clearly much more to be said on the subject), but 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENT||WP:RS||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: to World Bank (striking nom and proposing Merge; the depth of coverage is not enough to pass  and support a standalone article - news articles primarily simply acknowledge the program existst
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)