Deletion of Grace Mang

Comment: Passes  reliable, sources, independent of subject, e.g. CRI, Reuters, BBC but fails "significant coverage". Perhaps one notable achievement (Sinohydro CSR) is not enough, especially when the sources there are primary. No obvious merge target. Special:Contributions/92.251.255.12|92.251.255.12
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No impact on scholarship seen. No pass of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails to meet |notability requirements. She is sometimes quoted in the media as a lobbyist/spokespersonhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-15123833 but there are no biographical details or detailed analysis of her work. Being quoted as an acknowledged expert helps to establish notability per  but being quoted as a spokesperson does not. To write an article we need relilable sources about her, not just a few quotes. She's written some articles in the media e.g.http://www.theaustralian.com.au/archive/business/river-use-the-next-global-challenge/story-fn8ex0p1-1226064997582 but in itself that doesn't establish notability. I'm not sure if A7 applies: there are mid-level bureaucratic roles and publications. But she does not meet the higher notability standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROF)