Deletion of 2012–13 Rangers F.C. season

Comment: Several issues with this nomination, primarily the fundamental logical fallacy that "phoenix club = GNG failure" - that needs a lot more substantiation that the nom has provided. Secondly, although, along with a large number of the other league seasons noted in the template link above, techinally this seem a clear  failure due to not being a club in a "top professional league", there does appear to be a degree of consensus established that all Scottish teams are notable enough for season articles. Personally, i would disagree, there is little more than  coverage and seemingly clear contraventions of #STATS in a large number of them, which arguably need to be dealt with; but the place for that would be at WT:FOOTY to establish a consensus for Scottish football teams, as is being done Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Season_articles|here for English teams, not through a random AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NOT)

Comment: Rangers are not a phoenix club and there is one thing for sure this article and any other about the club meets . Rangers don't play in fourth tier they play in the third. Suggest user is trying to make a |point rather than this being a valid nomination, her views re the club have been made very clear in discussions previously and her view that Rangers F.C.|Rangers are a pheonix club is not the consensus view here on Wikipedia nor the general view of sources in the media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POINT)

Comment: would rather see an article on the whole league season as this has the appearance of a ''|Excessive listings of statistics'' especially the Squad information and Squad statistics sections, those sections need to be sourced and the a  provide for them flags or they fail  and must be removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK||WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: this subject passes the |general notability guideline even if we only took ''Norwegian'' sources into consideration (http://www.fvn.no/tema/godhelg/Trofast-til-verdens-ende-2406204.html#.UiWwGxw-Mrc http://www.tv2.no/sport/fotball/skottland/rangers-med-knusende-tilskuersnitt-3955186.html). But LGA and Struway has some good points - the excessive listing of statistics should be trimmed and more prose should be added, but that could be discussed on the talk-page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)