Deletion of Siddharth Shetty

Comment: The nomination is clearly good-faith, but I'd say in error; while about half of the article's sources are non-independent of the subject and primary in nature or otherwise non-suitable for verification or notability assessment, at least six of them are acceptable reliable sources which treat the subject in detail.  (which is the principle I assume nom was referencing via  essay) does not seem to apply here as notability appears to be established via 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)

Comment: Yes, the nomination is made in good-faith. However I do not understand the word "lasting notability" in terms of biographies, I think it only applies into |event cases. Notability is not temporary. In present case, subject appears to be meeting  standard. Sources, -http://www.epaperoheraldo.in/Details.aspx?id=16877&boxid=15521178&uid=&dat=7/4/2014, http://www.navhindtimes.in/funding-dreams-fuelling-enterprise/, http://www.newindianexpress.com/education/edex/Early-Start-to-Entrepreneurship/2014/03/03/article2083174.ece, http://searchindiannews.in/#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=%22Siddharth%20Shetty%22&gsc.sort= etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT||WP:GNG)