Deletion of 2032 Summer Olympics (4th nomination)

Comment: The fact that something somewhere has been written about the tentative future of this potential event doesn't magically make it encyclopedic.  #INDISCRIMINATE, #CRYSTALBALL
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: and salt per nominator's rationale.  It is ridiculous that an encyclopedia has a stand-alone article for an event that is not scheduled to take place for 17 years, for which the location and exact dates cannot be determined (the location will not be determined for another 10 years), and for which there is no certainty that it will even occur (the 1916, 1940 and 1944 Olympics were canceled because of war).  Notwithstanding the reliable sources included, this article is an exercise in speculation.  Please note what the |general notability guidelines state: "significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included.  A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article."  To the extent we should have coverage of the 2024, 2028, 2032 and subsequent Olympics, the pertinent content could be distilled and combined into a single article titled "Future Summer Olympics," or a "Future Olympics" table within the parent Summer Olympics article.  The creation of this article is a violation of the spirit, if not the letter of , and a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:TOOSOON)