Deletion of List of mad scientists (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per nomination. The article that falls into WP:!|what Wikipedia is not, by being |a list of loosely associated topics. Most of the characters aren't notable for themselves, relying on listing the notable series in which they appear, and most of these characters aren't notable for being "mad" scientists. The inclusion criteria is subjective and arbitrary and, as pointed out by others, it relies on |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:OR)

Comment: Most aren't even scientists at all http://cowbirdsinlove.com/46. Seriously though, as it was said the inclusion criteria is subjective enough that this can't fail |OR. We'll have to wait until Rolling Stone makes a top 100
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)