Deletion of Brandon Tatum

Comment: Although Tatum's POV is aversive to most editors, I do think that we can all agree on the need to describe sources accurately.  It is flagrantly untrue that "almost every single reference seems to mention him in connection with Turning Point USA" - sources now on the page show Turning Point be his 2nd paid employment as a political activist, both jobs came after the national attention in 2006, and 2007.  And article meets BASIC because his childhood, college football career, ane employment history are covered in multiple , as is his political activism.  Nor is overage of a college football career is not mere "local," coverage, especially not when it is revisited by national media a decade later.  It is inaccurate to dismiss "the video that went viral"  as "a single event" because there were two such "events", the Trump campaign thing in 2016 and the "crybabies" thing in 2017  related to the U.S. national anthem protests (2016–present).  Fact is, "run of the mill middle level operative(s)," do not get the kind of coverage that Tatum continues to get
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: fails , what reliable sources I could find about him were all regarding a single event, which was his dismissal from the Tucson Police Dept. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Political operatives aren't automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, but the only reference being cited here at all just makes him a  rather than a subject of enough sustained and substantive media coverage to clear 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources; fails . Not independently notable of TPUSA, while a merge would not improve the target article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I think a line or two documenting his role could be added to Turning Point USA, along with mention of his former employer and controversy of leaving, which seems related to his new position. A lot of good work has been done for the article in the days since it was first nominated for deletion, and in the future if there is a bit more significant coverage such that this subject eventually meets , it would be nice to see that work to have gone to waste
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: No  coverage,  and |article content can't change notability. &#8211
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:CONTN)

Comment: doesn't pass , arguably violates BLP1E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: A thorough and comprehensive explanation of how this article easily passes  is listed above, dated 16 March.  With regard to BLP1E, please note how the current article passes :   '''1.'''  "reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event." - passes, the article has 19 different sources, which are from the years 2004, 2005, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019.  The sources are from different events in the life of the subject.  For example, the 2004 and 2005 newspaper articles tend to be from the subject's athletic career while in college.  The 2016 sources tend to be from one event while the subject was a police officer, and include one ''The Washington Post'' citation, for example; the 2017 sources generally arise from an entirely different event that also took place while the subject was a police officer; the final seven sources, dated October 2017 to February 2019, and which include two articles from ''The Washington Post'', document the subject's later career as a political activist.  It cannot be argued with a straight face that "a single event" applies in any way, so the article passes.  '''2.''' "person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual" - passes, this is why newspapers around the nation have cumulatively reported on the individual for decades now and reflect the three main phases of the career of the subject, i.e., his sports career, his police officer career, and his activist career.  How many low profile individuals get newspaper coverage decade after decade, 2004 to 2019? '''3.'''  "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented" - this third criterion does not apply as the subject has been followed by the news media across the years, and not for one single event.   requires that ''all three conditions be met'': "We generally should avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met".  Insofar as the subject does not met condition 1, does not meet condition 2, and does not meet condition 3, it is impossible to say that the article violates BLP1E.  Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BLP1E)