Deletion of Gillian Baverstock

Comment: It simply isn't true that Baverstock has nothing to satisfy . She has been "the subject of published secondary sources"; an example of which is linked to on the page. She is well known in Enid Blyton circles and makes many public appearances at literature festivals (I've begun to add these on the page). The page does need to be expanded, but we'll struggle if it's deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: to the Enid Blyton article.  Nothing to satisfy . Baverstock is only mentioned in newspaper stories about mother, so anything which needs saying about her can be included in that article. The Blyton article is a bit sparse in the personal life section, so it would benefit from a merge. She seems a very ordinary person other than being the offspring of a popular author, Baverstock's own books about her mother are extremely non-notable. Having written a book which has an ISBN number does not prove notability One has no sales rank on Amazon and the other is 2.7 millionth in sales, hardly earthshaking, and clearly a million other authors are more deserving of Wikipedia articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)