Deletion of Peter N. Kirstein

Comment: With only one book out, it looks  for .  Citation record is extremely weak for  C1, and there is little sign of other NPROF criteria, nor of GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)

Comment: The situation with this article is actually more complicated than it appears at first glance, as I'll try to explain. Indeed, the suject does not seem to be notable as a historian, and I believe he does not pass . As DGG notes, much of the article reads rather propotional now. There is one fairly well cited paper in GScholar, but that seems to be about it. I could not find any published reviews of his book(s) or other writings. He has some publications on the subject of academic freedom and tenure but they received only a few citations, and his activities in this area do not appear to have received significant coverage, with one exception. The present version of the article contains a weirdly written unsourced section 'E-mail Exchange'. However, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_N._Kirstein&direction=prev&oldid=672873593 an earlier version of the article contains a different, much longer, version of that section, with several sources, including http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/1785699/detail.htmlhttp://hnn.us/articles/1095.htmlhttp://chronicle.com/free/v49/i15/15a01402.htm. There was also a WSJ editorial about this controversy https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1037064158123750748. At some point in 2015 an IP editor from near Gary, Indiana
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)