Deletion of ESP Guitars

Comment: Notable and well known national guitar brand played by musicians like James Hetfield, there is a https://www.google.com/search?q=esp+guitars&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS655US655&sxsrf=ALeKk03UzD2bzGNpefhcACqi-JDJKKNctw:1599937760289&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwie8fTOqOTrAhVyhq0KHU1RB8wQ_AUoA3oECBkQBQ&biw=1010&bih=644 multitude of sources available in industry publications. Many https://www.google.com/search?q=esp+guitars&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS655US655&tbm=bks&sxsrf=ALeKk00tJqYXDH5tQz9h5cuwMbCn_ZGY5w:1599937774657&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjZ9eHVqOTrAhUFKa0KHZv_BdMQ_AUIFSgB&biw=1010&bih=644&dpr=1 books where we can glean facts. , the AfD is not for nominating notable subjects which are poorly written
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: and . Echo the other comments that the nomination is frivolous. The argument "suspected to fail " isn't credible, even the most basic web search shows significant coverage in reliable sources, such as this one: https://books.google.com/books?id=NjmCDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22esp+guitars%22. The nominator has been around long enough to know that they shouldn't propose deletion without even looking for sources showing notability, see . Regarding promotional or unsourced content, see  and . There are dozens of musician and other general articles that link to it, so it's certainly not a walled garden. The existence of other stub articles about individual models is entirely irrelevant to the question of deleting the main article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:FIXIT)