Deletion of John Michael Vore

Comment: As per nom and Melcous, this is simply a bunch of self-promoting filler for a person with no indication of notability. This editor clearly has some problems with  — edits of his were reverted last year on the Jean-Paul Marat article for inserting his own opinion on the subject — and him writing an article about himself is simply a reflection of his obvious narcissistic belief that his opinions and his image matter more then anyone else's. He blatantly lies about "following policy" (conveniently ignoring the different policies that Bearcat mentioned in his initial deletion nomination) and also paints it as though Bearcat is the only editor on Wikipedia that would object to his article, that if he showed any other competent editor this dumpster fire of an article, that they wouldn't immediately vote delete. In conclusion, Informatics411 is simply a self-centered editor who disregards any argument against him and repeatedly lies in an attempt to defame editors who criticize his work. Wikipedia:TNT|Blow the article up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: blatant self promotion with no clear indication of notability because of the way it is written. . If the creator wants to write a neutral article about himself that clearly demonstrates his notability, then he would need to do so using the  process. (Personally, I probably would have just moved the article to draft space rather than bringing it to AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:AFC)