Deletion of Speedof.me

Comment: The appropriate guidelines for this topic is . I disagree with JavaHurricane that the reason for deletion is that the article does not make any claim of significance. There are multiple references that discuss the specific notability of this website, which is that because it uses HTML5 it may be more accurate than other technologies. If this claim needs to stand out in the article, then fix the article. Its certainly not a reason to delete. Whpq !votes to delete because they say that the references "just mostly" include this website in a list of lots of speed test sites. That isn't entirely accurate. Most of the references contain reviews with indepdendent reviews carried out by the tech journalist/author and not just a mere list of websites. In my opinion, here are two references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. https://www.cnet.com/how-to/how-to-find-a-reliable-network-speed-test/ This CNET article discusses this website in some detail, comparing results obtained with results from other testing sites and explains why HTML5-based speed tests have an advantage. https://www.lifewire.com/speedof-me-review-2624877 This Lifewire article also provides an in-depth article on the website and the technology including the Independent opinion of the journalist. Topic is notable, meets GNG/
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: The article needs a bit of expansion. The references seem reliable. However, reference #9 has an exact phrase about the site from #8, the former should be removed. Other than that, the article is good enough to pass . My vote stands. I won't reply any further
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SNG)