Deletion of Matthew M. Urquhart

Comment: and '''salt''', for failing to meet , , ,  and  criteria. No proof is provided to any of the claims in the article. Even when such proof is requested, people affiliated with this person do nothing but repeat the same things ''ad nauseam'' and making accusations toward those who require the proof. In fact, a page about Project_Home_2011_(Scientific_research_project) had already been nominated for deletion last year, and the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Project_Home_2011_(Scientific_research_project) consensus was "'''Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:NPOV)

Comment: This article has problems with all of  (where is the evidence of notability?),  (where is the evidence that he actually did any of this), and  (this appears to be a fringe topic and as such should be counterbalanced by the mainstream view on his work; where is it?). Additionally the link http://www.bttf.com/forums/topic.php?tp=35882-RE%3A+There+may+be+hoverboards+by+2015! left by {{user|Devil Master}} in the deletion rationale for a contested prod is troubling; the inconsistencies pointed out by some posters in that thread suggest that we need to be extra careful with verifiability here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:NPOV)