Deletion of Golden Gate Ventures

Comment: Thank you {{u|Ckevinliu}} for a comprehensive response with links to support your arguments. If only more did this. I have looked at the references you provided and I will respond by using the same numbering system as you. I believe you should read  and especially  as most of these references fail the criteria there. I also believe you are misinterpreting one of the 'primary criteria' - "independent". This is interpreted to mean that the reference is "intellectually independent" and not that the publisher/journalist has no corporate/personal affiliation with the company. Finally, the notability criteria disregards company-initiated coverage (press releases, announcements, interviews) repeated in publications unless the publication adds intellectually independent analysis or opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Coverage'', in general, is not part of the criteria for establishing notabilty. Please read . You've provided a link to https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/expat-money/9110631/Singapore-the-next-Silicon-Valley.html this Telegraph reference but it fails both  and  as it relies extensively on a quotation and has no original analysis/opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: does not meet . Sources offered above are passing mentions, routine founding news and / or . None of the sources meet , resulting in a self-promotional article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:SPIP||WP:ORGIND)