Deletion of R3 (company)

Comment: no evidence of satisfying either  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:GNG)

Comment: While this discussion appears to have |no quorum, it is '''NOT eligible for |soft deletion''' because it has been Special:Diff/970684689|previously PROD'd (via summary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NOQUORUM||WP:SOFTDELETE)

Comment: Typical startup article. References are run-of-the-mill business news. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: The usual PR, announcements, churnalism, articles relying solely on interviews and information provided by the company. The first link provided by Zingus above is an announcement on a related parties website with no attributed author/journalist, fails . The Forbes reference in on the "sites" part of the website, fails . Not a single reference meets the criteria for notability and I suspect the David E. Rutter topic page would also fail at AfD. It someone wants to !vote Keep, please provide references that meet NCORP guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:RS)