Deletion of The Works of Alan Watts

Comment: Deletion is normally a last resort. See . All problems stated here are fixable by normal editing. I agree with {{u|Gestcom}} that including this long list of works in Alan Watts would clutter it unnecessarily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: this is a notable topic for an article but once |promotional and |personal opinion wording is removed like "Alan Watts was one of the greatest orators and philosophers of the 20th century." and "I believe many of Watts' greatest works were his lectures and I think that ... " theres not much left of the intro, where are the |sources that discuss Watts' lectures, and why aren't his numerous books included (see Alan Watts#Bibliography|main article)? suggest '''delete''' and or '''|draftify
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:DRAFTIFY)

Comment: WP:DRAFTIFY says little about the circumstances under which draftification is appropriate, but it refers back to its currently inactive predecessor rticle incubator, which makes it clear that incubation/draft status is a last resort for articles that would otherwise require deletion. Stubs should never be deleted just for being stubs, and they should never be draftified just for being stubs either. And the present page is not a stub ''when considered as a whole'' anyway; only its blanked summaries of the talks look that way. TD, , AND  apply just as much to draftification as to outright deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:ATD||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:DINC)