Deletion of Los Tres Hermanos

Comment: per nom. Ghits is only one of a number of suggested alternative tests for notability (and this case it would look to be a bad one). Also looks to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I fail to see how this is a vanity article.    It's not promoting any of their animations, nor does it seem to portray them in a shining light.  It has no external links to a website which they own, it's not promoting merchandise, it merely talks about the origins and possible direction of their work and studio.  Furthermore, while they're not the most famous animators to hit the scene,  they have a very large base of viewers and a smaller--but still large--base of dedicated fans.  That should seem to be some semblance of notability.  Even if it isn't, it flat out states on the page that "'''notability is not formal policy (and indeed the whole concept of notability is contentious)'''"  I feel this article is approached from a neutral perspective, and can continue to grow as their organization's recognition and filmography grows.  They meet notability under '''Large Fan Base''' and '''Name Recognition''' under the people section.    As for web content, Los Tres Hermanos is being featured in an interview for a magazine titled Blue and Gold about their opinions on the upcoming next gen. systems, showing their animations are wide spread enough to get them recognized.  Halo vs Counter Strike won the Daily 3rd Place Award and got Weekly 12th Place out of hundreds of thousands of animations submitted every week on newgrounds, which means they must be doing something right and are good at what they do.  The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators.  Los Tres Hermanos & Co's animations meet all the qualifications for notable web content, Los Tres Hermanos & Co themselves meet many of the qualifications for notable people.  I will admit they do not meet  standards, and they are not an organization according to wiki-standards, but I feel they're not an organization either.  They are simply some people who make animations--they're good at what they do, they're getting recognized for it, but they're not an organization.  They're an animation team, not a company/organization/corporation. I see no reason to delete this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:BIO||WP:WEB||WP:ORG)

Comment: fails , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN||WP:WEB||WP:ORG)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)