Deletion of Charles Pelly (civil servant)

Comment: His position is clearly enough to satisfy notability, as the senior financial official of an Indian presidency and a member of the Legislative Council. Although appointed and not elected, that clearly seems to meet the criteria of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Inclusion of a name in what is essentially a list of employees doesn't qualify as an RS for the purposes of /.&nbsp; The sources provided are good as RS for information included in the article, but they do nothing to demonstrate that this person was in any way “worthy of note”.&nbsp; It's the equivalent of every person that has performed military service in the last 500 years; they all exist somewhere in an official government document or ledger, but that doesn't mean they all get WP articles about them unless there is some additional source to indicate that they did something of note during that time.&nbsp; Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:BIO)

Comment: there seems to be enough information to fill out a decent stub on the subject. I |started the process to rescue this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)