Deletion of Murder of James Craig Anderson

Comment: I'm tempted to think that this passes , , and , as the sources are national,  with wide and fairly in depth  coverage. The long term effects are unable to be known at the moment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOSCOPE||WP:INDEPTH||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: does not fail ´. Everything is well cited and correct
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Meets  with flying colors, this murder case has become a symbol of existing violent racism in the USA, and dominates current public discourse on race. That is a highly notable, encyclopedic topic. We are not a police blotter, but this case is clearly not a pedestrian hate crime as not being treated as such by the RS. Issues around BLP, if any, should be treated in the article, not via deletion of the article on the incident. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENTS)

Comment: WP:BLP does not apply here, but  does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: all mention of "suspect" ''and'' the redirect in his name. Per .  Else delete the whole mess. Wikipedia is not a police blotter for the world.  Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Every statement is both well-cited and attribution to individuals are all labeled as alleged, so  does not apply.   By the nominator's logic, we'd be deleting 2011 Norway attacks as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)