Deletion of KSSOLV

Comment: Almost all the references are for background information on the type of problem this software is meant to solve; they don't actually discuss (or even mention) this software package in particular.  The remaining references are all to primary sources.  So as far as I can tell the article is supported by no sources at all which are independent of the subject and which cover it in detail.   is not met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per Prodego and Tamcd00dle; meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NSOFT)

Comment: As with your previous nomination at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Programming_with_Big_Data_in_R, there is no WP policy that states an article needs to be notable outside a given specialty. Instead the real criteria for AfD are whether (1) there are multiple independent in-depth reliable sources and (2) the article has surmountable problems. The article has five references, all to peer-reviewed articles in mainstream math, physics and chemistry journals that are all considered reliable sources.  One concern is that all the references about KSSOLV involve the project originators, but there exist independent articles such as http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/120894385 Adaptive Regularized Self-Consistent Field Iteration with Exact Hessian for Electronic Structure Calculation and https://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-112409-140359/unrestricted/pni.pdf Anderson Acceleration of Fixed-point Iteration with Applications to Electronic Structure Computations that consider KSSOLV in depth. Multiple independent sources show this topic to be notable. There are article problems--I agree with RadioFan that the article is too technical, and the further reading list is too extensive--but these are surmountable problems, per . A notable topic and surmountable problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: per others who have pointed to lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. While the article is referenced, the references mostly cover background not directly related to the subject of the article. Those references that do address KSSOLV are not sufficiently independent or significant to meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)