Deletion of Beesfund

Comment: Hi {{u|Kochas}}, no, the basis for my !vote has very little to do with the language of the reference as Google Translate is very helpful in that regard. Just FYI, you should be a little more careful of shooting accusation/allegation at experienced editors, To turn your own arguments against you (only so that you can see how meaningless they really are) - you appear to have an overly-simplistic version of the type of reference that is required to meet the criteria for notability. An Independent Reference does not simply mean that the publisher has no link with the company but that the content must also be independent. How can you contribute to the conversation if you don't even know the applicable policies and guidelines? Please take a look at the definition of "Independent Content" at  and then point me to any one of the the 80 links that meet the criteria and I will point out in detail why it fails the criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)

Comment: fails  & . Sourcing is in passing and / or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:PROMO||WP:SPIP)