Deletion of Jacques Derrida on deconstruction

Comment: to Deconstruction.  Rather than becoming a "battlefield" in which "derrideans" and "non-derrideans" viciously lay waste to one another, I think the focused Venn diagram|comparison and contrast between these differing viewpoints of the ''same idea'' would be most readable in a single page.  You have to remember that if more and more editors edit the two separate pages, there will likely be a Divergent evolution|divergence and decline in cohesiveness of purpose of these two articles (which really by their nature ''need'' to be compared/contrasted, I believe).  Keep in mind that |Wikipedia is not a textbook
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTEXTBOOK)

Comment: per  and .  This is an extremely-well sourced article.  The nomination is a mix of  and , the latter argument being incomplete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:FORK)