Deletion of NIX (company)

Comment: That's a very common misunderstanding. References are mainly within an article including to support facts and assertions within an article. But that doesn't mean that those references meet the standard required to establish notability of the topic. You can have an article with numerous references that don't meet the requirements for establishing notability. What we are concerned with here are identifying those references that meet the criteria for supporting notability and those references must meet the criteria in GNG/NCORP and those references must meet  and  and  in addition to being . Also  - if you find other articles you believe don't have references that establish notability of the topic, nominate them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Concerning the claims that some sources of the article don't meet . Hm, it's not true that in 100% cases all the sources in Wikipedia articles should meet. At least the practice tells that. Take a look at any not-a-stub Wikipedia article and you will find numerous sources that fail to meet . That because such sources support/cite some specific facts or numbers in a particular article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails . As all the sources seem to be trivial, primary, or attempts at establishing notability through association
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Puff piece with a lack of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)