Deletion of Texture advection

Comment: Total failure of , with hundreds of reliable sources right there on the GB and GS limks. -- Special:Contributions/202.124.74.22|202.124.74.22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The nomination seems to misunderstand our  policy, which has nothing to do with the potential for expansion. {{cquote|One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary entry, and stubs are often poorly written. Another perennial source of confusion is that some paper dictionaries, such as "pocket" dictionaries, lead editors to the mistaken belief that dictionary entries are short, and that short article and dictionary entry are therefore equivalent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: spaced ndash}} Easily passes . These articles are all from page one of the Google Scholar link above http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Texture+advection%22 here. This topic is clearly well-beyond a dictionary definition. I've also added these sources to the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)