Deletion of Keeping the Kibbutz

Comment: per ''just'' meeting  through coverage in mulitple reliable sources. A "staff writer" writing an article about this film is perfectly acceptable, as theere is no mandate that films can ''only'' be notable if reviewed by the (subjective term) of "nationally known" film critic. THAT desire, though nice to have. is not part of |guideline's sourcing requirements. We have no realistic expectation nor demand that Roger Ebert or ''The New York Times'' could or would review every film ever made. Any film, including indepedent niche films must meet , and this one does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:GNG||WP:NF)

Comment: I have reviewed the sources in the article and conducted my own searches and unable to find the sourcing needed to establish notability.  The first reference in the article is a press release which asserts that the film won a Telly Award.  There is no coverage about this aside from the press release.  The reason is that the Telly awards are not a major award, and in fact, they are handed out willy-nilly like candy.  The second source is an interview with director Tessa Moran and not a review of the film.  Interviews are weak sources for establishing notability.  The third source is a blog.  Blogs are not |reliable sources with some exceptions; this is not one of those exceptions.  Actually, the best reliable source is listed in the external links section in the form of the http://washingtonjewishweek.com/main.asp?SectionID=27&SubSectionID=25&ArticleID=15792 Washington Jewish Week review of the film.  I will note that the person doing the review is a staff writer, and thus would not be one of the nationally known critics asserted by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Per . This film has received a major award and has received several full length reviews by nationally known critics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)