Deletion of Shwebomin (2nd nomination)

Comment: No solid coverage in independent reliable sources.  It could be |userfied, as Soewinhan suggested, but (1) we'd have to have someone willing to take it, and (2) it would be best to delete it after a year or two should no improvements be made, since |we're not an indefinite webhost
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY||WP:HOST)

Comment: clearly notable with significant coverage.  There are no longer deadlinks in the article's references, the former links have been restored using archive data in accordance with Wikipedia:Link rot.  Also, there are things that can be considered reliable when they come from the biographical article's source.  See #Using the subject as a self-published source and #Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves. It would seems that one's status as a ''pretender'' would fall into the usable category, and thus make an interview a reliable source ''for that purpose''. Shwebomin is also listed as a claimant under Burma in the http://www.put.com/~monarchy/claimlist.html Constantian Society database. While I don't believe that he is the ''legitimate'' pretender to the Burmese throne, see Christopher Buyers's http://www.royalark.net/Burma/konbaun1.htm Genealogy of the Konbaung Dynasty especially page 19, I do believe, as is substantiated in the article by reliable sources, that he is ''a'' pretender. So what if he is primarily a socialite (See helping open https://web.archive.org/web/20090627042011/http://www.ccrj.org/4733.html Stephen Desmond's documentary, 'The Jaweed Al Ghussein Story', socialites can be notable. See the article on Anna Anderson for a similar, but distinct, case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:SELFPUB)

Comment: Being a pretender is not grounds for automatic notability — anyone can claim to be royalty. And the question of how strong his claim is, while no doubt contentious, is irrelevant for us: the more important question is whether he's |notable for being a pretender. The sources found so far (minor newspapers, trivial mentions in longer stories, and web sites with a clear bias) are not enough to convince me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)