Deletion of Systemwars.com (second version)

Comment: per , previous VfD, and ongoing VfU discussion, which are nearly unanimous delete/keep deleted. Content is "new" in the sense that it's a summarization of the previously-deleted content (whether it was intended that way by Tony or not), and I fail to see which circumstances have changed &ndash; Alexa of http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=systemwars.com 470,884 doesn't indicate any significant increase in popularity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: via G4. If the recreation is as similar to the original as Texture suggests, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Systemwars.com Geogre's action in speedily deleting the recreation is appropriate per the |deletion policy and the |criteria for speedy deletion. It should be noted that to overcome the "substantially identical copy" clause of G4, a recreation must address ''those features of the original that were felt to be in contravention of WP policies and guidelines'' in the first place. The original version of this article was validly deleted via Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Systemwars.com|VfD principally because it so lacked notability (to use that much-maligned word) that it did not have independent sources that would adequately meet the |verifiability requirements of this encyclopedia. , the heart and soul of an encyclopedia and one of WP's great trinity, regretably also appears to be the most ignored WP policy. To quote from that repository of good sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:CSD||WP:V||WP:V)