Deletion of Eastside Sun

Comment: The publication seems to be purely local in scope, and I do not think that it meets Wikipedia's |notability criteria.  There does not seem to be much independent writing about this publication except for the coverage of a lawsuit it is involved in, and that coverage is also purely local in scope and does not rise above the level of OTNEWS|ordinary daily local news.  If no one else outside the Kirkland, Washington area has seen fit to write in any depth about the Eastside Sun, there is no reason for Wikipedia to be the first
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: whats going on" isn't the concern. The concern is reliable sources showing this newspaper meets Wikipedia's standards for inclusion (). Many newspapers are notable and newspapers often have public interest, but sources are still needed to substantiate whether or not they have gained notice. I'm not seeing them. It's not clear this is more than a small local paper of the same kind as many other non-notable small local papers. #INDISCRIMINATE|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection..... nor a #DIR|directory nor a #ADVERTIZING|medium for advertizing etc
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: for failure to make .  If the Federal civil rights suithttp://www.pnwlocalnews.com/east_king/kir/news/90801004.html turns out to be notable, it should be added to the Kirkland media section
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)