Deletion of Hammad Safi (2nd nomination)

Comment: a 10-year-old with charm, poise, Youtube videos and a PR agent, but inadequate INDEPENDENT, ONGOING SIGCOV to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: what we seem to disagree on here is whether the sources can in fact be called . There are three sources currently in the article, where the first one is an AFP press release published in dawn.com; the second one is from ibtimes.co.in and clearly based on the same press release, using the same press kit photos and quoting the same people we saw in the dawn.com source; while the third is a brief promotional blurb written in a sensationalistic tone. In my  search I looked through quite a few of the search hits, but everything I found was either evidently (to me, at least) churnalism based on the same AFP press release - translated into other languages, which doesn't make it any less of a press release - or brief notices. There is no doubt that this is a talented and charismatic person, but there is also no doubt that there is a marketing team behind him, and when we are talking about a child, I think the requirements for actual secondary sources needs to be extra high. If there are in fact multiple independent sources about him, it would be good if those could be mentioned here or added to the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per  The only reason he is mentioned in the news is that he is a 11 year old kid giving lectures. The kind of "''man bites dog''" novelty that is expected in a newspaper. The Wikipedia:Search engine test|google hits isnt a valid argument. Some of the sources does appear promotional
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)