Deletion of Thomas Ice (2nd nomination)

Comment: Not seeing anything that would suggest Ice meets GNG, just brief mentions/quotes (https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2009/11/sarah-palin-and-the-rapture/30587/ The Atlantic, https://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/isittheendoftheworld/2014/05/the-fig-tree-parable.html Beliefnet). The closest he gets to meeting  would be having a "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" (pre-tribulation rapture), but independent reliable sources demonstrating that don't seem to exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: His first book (coauthored with H. Wayne House) had significant impact; according to Neuhaushttps://www.firstthings.com/article/1990/05/why-wait-for-the-kingdomthe-theonomist-temptation, it was the "first book-length critique" of Christian reconstructionism, and "warmly endorsed by leading Evangelicals". I don't think that his writing on pre-tribulationism has seen the same response (though this isn't an area I'm particularly familiar with); but there are probably enough book reviews overall to pass . Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: His works have garnered significant critical attention, reviews published in several independent journals. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: Although there is absolutely no sign of , it looks like there are now plenty of reviews for , even on what looks to me like a |fringe topic.  I cut down the |CV-like list of books of uncertain impact to the reviewed ones, and otherwise edited towards MOS.  {{u|Genericusername57}} previously did the harder work of finding reviews
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:FRINGE||WP:NOTCV)

Comment: as multiple reliable sources book reviews references have been added that show a pass of  in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)