Deletion of David Bertman

Comment: found enough coverage to merit inclusion here under  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Nomo's points above are well-taken. I'm quite confident, in particular, that the distinction he draws concerning what constitutes an "ensemble" is spot on. Remember, guidelines like  essentially attempt to ''predict'' notability, and it seems to stretch the boundaries of common sense that all members of a notable marching band -- this is literally thousands of people over the course of a given marching band's history -- are notable for this particular association in the same way that  effectively "predicts" notability for a member of a rock band or string quartet, which has a much more limited and less given to fluctuation lineup
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I agree with Nomoskedasticity and Ginsengbomb about .  To me, the only viable way to argue that the article should be saved would be to say that Bertman's books satisfy some criteria in .  For example, Criteria 4 could be satisfied if ''several'' of Bertman's books "are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education."  I'm voting for deletion but would reconsider if someone comes up with a viable argument using 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:PROF)