Deletion of Bruce Clay

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources  to establish notability as required by  and .  What's offered is uncritical routine coverage (Wired), completely trivial mention (USA Today) or no mention at all (NHK), falling far short of what is required to establish ''significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: There are absolutely no reliable, independent and significant references in the article or that I could find.  Northamerica1000, you need to read  where it says, " 'Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material."  You say the http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008-09-11/business/0809101424_1_google-chairman-sam-zell-web-sites Chicago Tribune article establishes his nobility.  The article includes 3 sentences of him, but '''not about''' him.   You say you added http://news.yahoo.com/best-enterprise-seo-companies-ranked-topseos-com-september-040222843.html this reference from Yahoo News, but the reference never mentions him, just the company is ranked 6th
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: spaced ndash}}Here's a link that further qualifies notability: http://www.smallbusinesscomputing.com/emarketing/article.php/3621066/12-Essential-Tips-for-Search-Engine-Optimization.htm 12 Essential Tips for Search Engine Optimization from http://www.smallbusinesscomputing.com Smallbusinesscomputing.com. The individual is not "only", meaning exclusively, "mentioned" in the two sources quoted by the nominator; there are other reliable secondary sources with more in-depth coverage of the individual. Per  notability for people, specifically the section , "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". Therefore, the individual passes  due to the availability of stated sources. The statement that the individual lacks reliable sources per an entire guideline page such as  doesn't provide any specific rationale for deletion of the article, and exists as a generic, blanket statement without any form of actual qualification
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BASIC||WP:BIO||WP:BIO)