Deletion of Michael Lomax

Comment: Multiple sources can be found about him by basic searches, e.g., http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G2-2687000191.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-114008859.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-93039793.htmlhttp://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-120842937.html And as the former president of Dillard University https://books.google.com/books?id=CTkDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&dq=michael+lomax+dillard&source=bl&ots=4HtfeDGMD-&sig=0_Aas8Vf4XC1OYHg7h1CHK6RU_c&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tLYuVe6VD5DAgwSfjYSIDQ&ved=0CFAQ6AEwDA#v=onepage&q=michael%20lomax%20dillard&f=false he clearly passes  as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Nominator does not seem to realise that AfD is for deletion of article on non-notable subjects, not poorly sourced articles on notable subjects (although this article isn't even especially poorly sourced and is certainly not "unacceptably-sourced" as claimed in the prod). There is no mandate to delete poorly sourced articles, although some editors seem to believe there is. Citing  is a red herring, as his employers' website ''is'' a reliable source on his career. BLP is primarily intended to protect living people against inaccurate statements in their articles and one assumes Dr Lomax probably has no problem with his page on the United Negro College Fund website
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)