Deletion of Finnish numerals

Comment: per RDBury. Could also merge to Finnish language (like the French language article), but it's not a matter of deletion. Also, there references cleary indicate that there are entire book chapters about this. Inline references aren't needed for an article which merely summarized 1-2 such references; see #General reference. Asking for an article to be delete on these grounds is ridiculous
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: Again  applies.  Just because other stuff exists, does not mean that this subject is notable.  To be notable, the subject needs secondary sources that are independent and verifiable.  This one has none (other than references to dictionaries or user guides
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: Well sourced?  There are no inline citations and the three "references" are grammatical user guides, which makes the article suspect under .  The existence of Finnish grammar doesn't make it notable.  I don't think the sources establish notability at all. Also the existence of other, similar articles is not a valid argument to keep this one.  Besides, many of the other articles are actually about numerals (Roman, chinese, etc).  This one is about language and is very much in the style (and content) of an extensive user guide
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: Contra to Doc Quintana, this article is not about a relatively universal, or at least relatively language-independent Numeral system|system for written notation of numbers. It is about the grammar of referring to cardinal and ordinal numbers is spoken Finnish. That is why references to grammars of Finnish (not dictionaries, note) are appropriate as references. Grammar is a proper subject for Wikipedia &mdash; see for example Portal:Linguistics, ikiProject Languages, or equested articles/Social sciences#Linguistics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W||WP:R)

Comment: WP:NUMBER does not apply; numerals are not numbers and this is more about linguistics than math. There are similar articles for other languages but coverage is uneven, e.g. French numerals are covered in a section of French language and there doesn't seem to be any coverage of German numerals at all. Whether the article is well sourced is not the issue but rather whether it ''can'' be sourced, though it's always preferred that article's creator include sources so the issue doesn't come up. The real issue is notability, but I don't think that can be questioned, go to any bookstore and pick up a generic Finnish language book and numerals will be covered in lesson 4 (approx.). If this was some obscure language that was only spoken by 1000 people then notability would be an issue, but this is a relatively major language and the numeral system is a vital part of it. My only reservation is that the article seems too detailed and raises  issues. Perhaps the subject is complex enough that this level of detail is needed for proper coverage, but as long as the material is about the subject and does not attempt to teach people how to speak Finnish (which should be included in WikiBooks) I'm OK with it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTEXTBOOK)

Comment: Agreed.  See above, I conceded that point, but what about ? My point with nominating this for deletion was a question of notability.  i still don't think the article meets the notability requirements of Wikipedia.  none of the ''keep'' arguments here really address that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)