Deletion of KDF-55

Comment: Please see  and , and other editors comments on the talk page. A highly promoted product still needs assessing against the criteria of this nom (ie our  guidelines i.e. "''Significant coverage'' addresses the '''topic directly and in detail'''" ). For those that did add these claims, please note that disclosure is required per Wikipedia:AVOIDCOI, and . It's clear that the creator is an , and other editors have complained about this advert (i.e. ). We can delete articles even if they have many passing mentions in RS. Only sources will help, and a rewrite based on them
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:V||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:PAID||WP:SPA||WP:CONSENSUS)

Comment: This is an absurd nomination.   A quick look at the {{tlx|findsources}} notice I placed on the talk page shows that KDF-55 is a widely used and well documented substance used in a number of applications including water filtration.   That should have been examined  nominating for AFD.  I added a decent reference to the article removed a bunch of tags from the article like {{tlx|Notability}}, {{tlx|COI}} and {{tlx|HOAX}}.   It seems those tags have been added back for reasons that escape me (nuisance comes to mind).    is not a valid reason for AFD - it's a reason for rewriting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:TNT)