Deletion of Rashi Yadav

Comment: Participating in a pageant unfortunately is not a credible claim of significance. We have seen recently that winners of USA state pageants have been redirected to the event articles per . Over here, there is no claim of a win, so this is an unambiguous delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Meets neither  nor . Being merely a contestant in Miss Earth India is insufficient for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMODEL||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Doesn't even make it on a list to disqualify under . From the article: "She took part in Miss Diva 2015 pageant and could not make it to the top 7. As of September 2016, she is currently selected as a finalist of Miss Earth India 2016 pageant.", so there is less notability than Pankhuri Gidwani. {{Ping|CyberBrinda}} I can sympathize with you wanting to keep this article but there has to be a line somewhere, or no line at all, which is chaos. "If" the subject wins "Miss Earth India", and not just places, which I assume would be Miss Earth India 2016, out of the other 80 or 90 contestants, and there is more notability, you can request the article be reinstated by an admin. A better solution would be to create articles under current  like Wikipedia:Verifiability (policy) that includes Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources (a policy section), Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (content guideline) instead of inundating Wikipedia with articles that should be in another article, or articles that do not currently belong on Wikipedia at all. Reliable secondary sources is a criteria for inclusion by establishing notability to ensure the Reliability of Wikipedia. We need to continually build an encyclopedia based on these principles, that are reflected as the Wikipedia:Five pillars, and not on personal likes or dislikes or what "might" happen in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:policies and guidelines)