Deletion of Stephanie Banister

Comment: Yes, she has hit the international media, and without meaning to. But if it has any lasting significance it will be in the context of the present election and the success or otherwise of her party's campaign, and she herself will be left in obscurity. According to the BBC, her political career lasted 48 hours, and certainly does not satisfy the requirements of . If we were to have BLPs on every candidate who made a fool of themselves when standing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:SNOW)

Comment: Typical election season titillation. Yes, it was all very embarrassing, which led to some widespread coverage, but this is exactly what  is for. If she'd ever done anything apart from make a dill of herself on national television, well, then, maybe there'd be something to consider. As an aside, I consider her inclusion in both the election page and the One Nation page to be a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Per : "reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event" and : "being an unelected candidate for political office does not guarantee notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: as .  Making fun of her is a bit like kicking a puppy, really
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to One Nation (Australia), which has a section about the incident. Although we create articles for those in elected office, that doesn't usually extend to candidates, and a 48-hour candidature by someone who is otherwise non-notable hardly meets the |general notability guidelines
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)