Deletion of INX (company)

Comment: u|Tzahy}}, {{u|Gidonb}}, you both appear to be referencing . The applicable guideline is  with special attention to  references wrt  and . Can you link to any of the references you believe meet the criteria for establishing notabilty
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is  and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short,  requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. That means, nothing that relies on company information, advertorials or announcements or interviews, etc. which seem to make up most of the references. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate sufficient references that meet the criteria. Topic fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Passes the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)