Deletion of Silicone Sex World

Comment: per other uses citing actual WP policy on coverage needed. Lacking 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The criteria for establishing independent requires a minimum of two references. It isn't that these references must be from reliable sources but they must also be "intellectually independent". As per , this specifically excludes references that base their article exclusively on company announcements and also further states ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.'' Not a single one of the references either in the article or that I can find online meet this criteria. The references either fail  as the article is more interested in the titillating aspect of the product and says nothing about the company (the subject of this article), or they fail  where the company is name-checked, or they fail  where the article fails to provide any original/independent opinion/analysis/fact checking/investigation that is clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated with the company. Notable too that the Keep !voters haven't produced any references despite request. Topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: The company passes the notability requirements in line with . I agree that Google News Search turned up plenty of results about the company from independent news sources. Article needs to be refined to more appropriate wiki tone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Company is one of a number of sex doll suppliers in the UK of equivalent (un)importancehttps://metro.co.uk/2018/06/02/happens-introduce-sex-doll-relationship-7598840/. Coverage of the sex doll tester position is considered dependent (ref Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Examples of dependent coverage), and thus does not, by itself, meet requirements for NCORP -- nor does momentary coverage of that stunt meet . Remaining coverage (including what's visible at GNews) is extremely limited, from tabloid sources, and tastes like PR-dependent material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)