Deletion of The Sheik of Araby

Comment: IMHO this AFD shows why doing a thorough  search is important. While the article was not in good condition there are sources available online to back it up. I fully agree with {{u|DiamondRemley39}} on using the older material as a direction for looking for additional sources to corroborate what can be substantiated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per : The song was incredibly popular in the 1920s and is discussed in lots of sources. For example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: as it totally meets notability and sources are easy to find if you open your eyes to the Google. I actually LOLed at this nomination. This song is a HUGE deal. It was one of the most popular songs of the decade. Did you consider completing ? I couldn't even guess how many sources would cover this song, but it would be a LOT
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Though this article may not have many citations, it is still notable and https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&sxsrf=ALeKk00dC_ZYJhn6OAOsjd3TODjp9HLd_w:1584044414708&q=The+Sheik+of+Araby&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDn5al4ZXoAhVSkFwKHa1qCgwQBSgAegQIFRAn a quick Google search reveals that there are plenty of sources available to be cited. Most of the articles on Wikipedia lack enough citations. It passed  and can easily pass  with a little effort.  User:Berrely |Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOURCE)

Comment: A heavily-covered song, from :Duke Ellington, to :Django Reinhardt, even to :The Beatles. Along with the sources listed above,  criterion 3 applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NSONG)

Comment: passes , seems rather notable. A lack of many references alone should not constitute the grounds for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSICOTHER)