Deletion of Anarchic comedy film

Comment: Yup, article has |not been improved, but so what?  Better we encourage  of this |valid topic which has a number of quite suitable sources. http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22#hl=en&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Wacky+comedy%22&oq=%22Wacky+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...83937.86219.0.86547.12.9.0.0.0.6.329.2674.2-6j3.9.0...0.0.kCt7ZJbj_P8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1d8425869a4d273&biw=1024&bih=616http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22#hl=en&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Slapstick+comedy%22&oq=%22Slapstick+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...23938.25016.1.25282.3.3.0.0.0.0.140.140.0j1.1.0...0.0.GOblEE09b9E&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1d8425869a4d273&biw=1024&bih=616http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Wacky+comedy%22&oq=%22Wacky+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...75328.76453.0.76703.3.3.0.0.0.0.250.624.0j1j2.3.0...0.0.LFb6Z5M90d4&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=9ef31202156bf7cb&biw=1024&bih=616 http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22#hl=en&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Improv+comedy%22&oq=%22Improv+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...74766.78203.3.78735.15.14.0.0.0.7.406.3924.0j1j9j3j1.14.0...0.0.tWMG-Pm4rok&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1d8425869a4d273&biw=1024&bih=616http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Slapstick+comedy%22&oq=%22Slapstick+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...30093.31578.1.31843.3.3.0.0.0.0.234.593.0j2j1.3.0...0.0.xbhYnMm94X0&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=9ef31202156bf7cb&biw=1024&bih=616http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Improv+comedy%22&oq=%22Improv+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...63500.64578.2.64797.3.3.0.0.0.0.172.484.0j3.3.0...0.0.Bvk6Er2CEfI&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=9ef31202156bf7cb&biw=1024&bih=616 http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22#hl=en&gs_nf=1&ds=bo&pq=%22stream%20of%20consciousness%20comedy%22&cp=31&gs_id=58&xhr=t&q=%22stream+of+consciousness+comedy%22&pf=p&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&oq=%22stream+of+consciousness+comedy%22&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1d8425869a4d273&biw=1024&bih=616http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anarchic+comedy%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Stream+of+consciousness+comedy%22&oq=%22Stream+of+consciousness+comedy%22&gs_l=serp.3...36844.37969.3.38157.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0.nQk5caQePvw&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=9ef31202156bf7cb&biw=1024&bih=616 ... book and news searches for this topic that will require gleaning for information. My argument is, even if the article has been |neglected, the topic itself is widely souracble and the article '''can''' be improved.  Wikipedia knows that is itself an |imperfect, knows that it is itself a |work-in-progress, and pretty has no |deadline that an article be improved... just so long as sources exist and |improvement '''is''' possible... sometime
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:CLEANUP||WP:NRVE||WP:NEGLECT||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:WIP||WP:DEADLINE||WP:IMPROVE)