Deletion of Margot (activist)

Comment: While there is some substanial, reliable coverage like https://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/7,54420,26204578,przed-aresztowaniem-poprosila-o-biblie-kim-jest-slynna-margot.html?disableRedirects=true, it is all 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: with Polish Stonewall as per the aforementioned points regarding notability. The justification that Margot will continue to be notable or become more so seems to be 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: covered in significant number of independent reliable sources, and  does not apply because of both criteria 2 and criteria 3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per condition 2 in . While one can argue that they are currently mainly notable for a single event, I don't see it as a given that they are likely to remain a low-profile individual. If the significant and ongoing coverage subsides, then a merge might be appropriate, but for now I'd prefer to keep the article and see how this plays out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)