Deletion of Anti-Monopoly

Comment: As a fan of Monopoly, I vote for "keep" per above comments. I see nothing against 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: This article topic is just as notable as the Free Parking, Monopoly Tycoon, Monopoly: The Mega Edition, etc. board game articles. The game ''is'' distinct enough from Monopoly to warrant a separate article and is not affiliated with the Parker Brothers version. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125599860004295449.html This acceptable source is referenced in the article and more info can be added to the article from it. Info can also be sourced from the game's http://www.antimonopoly.com/antimonopoly_boardgame.html official site. Restructuring and copy-editing should be performed on the article, but the  doesn't apply for a deletion argument since it does not appear there are any opinions or non-neutral statements currently in the body of the article. The "Related Games" section contains one or two unsourced statements such as "was and is very popular", but this can easily be edited out. Sottolacqua
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: http://wafreepress.org/36/court.html 1 and http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125599860004295449.html 2 are both sources that meet . Sottolacqua
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)