Deletion of Tae Yun Kim (2nd nomination)

Comment: Let's start with the claims of accomplishments.  There's a long established WP custom on martial arts articles to ignore rank and halls of fame as indicators since anyone can start their own art and claim to be a grandmaster.  A number of articles on people who fit this description have had their articles deleted here. I've seen people with 1 year of martial arts experience create their own style and suddenly claim to be a 10th dan grandmaster.  There's no evidence any criteria of  is met and nothing to show that the "Pre World Games" are notable or, for that matter, that whatever World Games this was a warm-up for is notable.  It appears her martial art has exactly one school, hardly notable.  Honorary degrees do not confer notability.  Her award as "a Woman of the Year honoree by the California Legislative Women's Caucus" should be considered a local award as one women is chosen annually from each of California's 80 legislative districts and doesn't appear to be a major award, certainly nothing conferring automatic notability.  Winning two Stevie awards is not indicative of notability when you consider that each application costs over $500 plus paying for a banquet to receive an award worth $200--that's even worse than most of the martial arts halls of fame.  I'm not sure her books are not essentially self-published, and I see no criteria under  that she meets.  Founding a non-notable company also doesn't make her notable.  That just leaves me with a lot of self-promotion and a lack of sources that meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MANOTE||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: Notable woman leader with numerous honors. Article could use expansion, not deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: I see nothing to show she's a notable martial artist. Rank doesn't show notability, especially when you create your own style, nor do martial arts halls of fame. Coaching a team at the "Pre World Games" (whatever those are) is not notable. As far as meeting  goes, I'm not seeing significant independent coverage from reliable sources. She appears to be good at self-promotion, but that doesn't make her notable (or even unusual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Tag for better sources''' and '''Sigh'''. She obviously meets otability, we just need to source it, not delete it. Author, philanthropist, started her own system of martial arts..... there were allegations that she was a cult leader and her and her group were investigated by the TV show inside edition (Matt Maher, Tae Yun Kim (May 1998). Inside Edition (Television). United States of America: King World Television.) And just in case that isn't enough, she's the founder and CEO of a (seemingly) major Silicon Valley Tech company https://www.golighthouse.com/en/about-company/about-lighthouse-1 Here's an article on her winning an award for her work https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20171121006184/en/Dr.-Tae-Yun-Kim-Chairman-CEO-Lighthouse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)