Deletion of Tax choice

Comment: at this point, the article as written (aside from formatting problems and a pseudo-pop style) suffers from a combination of crippling failures: the lack of evidence that anybody but the author recognizes all of these as a single unified concept, making this term a |non-notable neologism; and a heaping pile of |original research and synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (:WP:NEO||:WP:OR)

Comment: can I strongly (impartially) suggest everyone holds off on the |personal attacks. Suggesting someone is not qualified/expert enough to edit a particular article/subject area is specifically listed at  as unacceptable behaviour linked to . I note warnings and blocks have been handed out only recently for the same. On the article itself, I personally would like to see less  (SYNTH) type content and more references that cover this term in particular. Bringing together similar refs/ideas and building an essay that tenuously links them is not enough to meet . We really need to demonstrate that this is a commonly used term to describe a recognised idea
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA||WP:OWN||WP:NPA||WP:OR||WP:N)

Comment: For outside editors...here's the context...Wikipedia_talk:Competence_is_required#Competence_vs_good_faith|competence vs good faith.  Rubin, the very FIRST reference...http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/your-money-your-choice.php?page=all Your Money, Your Choice...uses the term "tax choice".  But the term itself isn't important because |Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  Whether the term is "tax choice" or  http://www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv4c6.html "individual earmarking" or http://www.jstor.org/stable/40703229 "taxpayer sovereignty"...it's all the same concept.  A concept which is notable enough to warrant its own entry.  Again and again and again, your edits are extremely counterproductive, unhelpful and disruptive.  Please stop editing outside your area of expertise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDIC)