Deletion of Persecution of Muslims during Ottoman contraction

Comment: per . the events covered in the article are unrelated to one another. A lot of these details can be merged with the Persecution of Muslims article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per . I would support keeping the article, however, if the scope was narrowed to the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per , for lack of academic sources (other than Justin McCarthy) that discuss this topic as a topic.  Incidents such as the massacres during the Greek war of Independence and the Italo-Turkish War are so different from one another in every way (one an uprising of Ottoman subjects demanding independence, the other undertaken by the invading  Army of an expanding empire,) that they cannot be grouped together, and neither can be defined as "persecution" - not ever massacre is a persecution.  this is born out by the fact that the only source that links the two is Justin McCarthy - no reputable historian would discuss the events in this COATRACK in the same paper, and none has
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: No actual argument for deletion has been made by nomination.  , , , , and even  are all content issues, not notability issues.  There is no doubt that persecution of Muslims did exist in the Balkan successor states and that this is a topic of scholarly notice.  See, e.g., Poulton, The Muslim Experience in the Balkan states, 1919‐1991, ''Nationalities Papers'', 28(1)45:19 Aug 2010 or Bieber, Muslim Identity in the Balkans Before the Establishment of Nation States, ''Nationalities Papers'', 28(1)1:13:19 Aug 2010 or Mourelos, The 1914 Persecutions and the first Attempt at an Exchange of Minorities between Greece and Turkey,  ''Balkan Studies'', 26(2)389:1 Jan 1985.  eletion is not cleanup and clearly notable topics are not deleted just because they are poorly-written.  This article hardly rises to the level where  is required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:FRINGE||WP:CHERRY||WP:POV||WP:COATRACK||WP:D||WP:TNT)

Comment: per . and WP:GNG. Plenty of good references anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: At best this is |original research.  "|Other stuff exists" is not a credible argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OTHERSTUFF)