Deletion of Lloyd R. Woodson

Comment: Now the initial hysteria has passed, it is clear that unless something major happens, this is a non-notable |news story. Indeed, it is a minor news story that has rightly been given no coverage at all in many countries, including the UK. The short sub-section in the Fort Drum article more than adequately covers the subject, and I'm not entirely sure that is necessary either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Sorry, this is a blatant BLP violation and example of why Wikipedia does not lead. Here we have official evidence and statements he was arrested but not convicted and most tellingly that he is not considered a terrorist. We likely could come up with numerous other things he has been accused of but to be notable as a criminal or terrorist we lack sources of either. Perhaps the article is simply too soon? Maybe he will become well-known but for now we remain not a rystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: I would normally say that  applies, except that there's no event associated with this person. Must have been a slow news day or something, but  still applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: In order to preempt  we need extensive, '''prolonged''' coverage. This was news for a day (maybe two) and despite the existence of articles about the subject, he does not pass  for that reason
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E)