Deletion of Andrew Rutherford Davidson

Comment: this one of several articles created by a recently joined apparently single-purpose account.  also says "multiple sources are generally expected", and the single source here closely resembles company-sponsored "history of our company" puff books, and thus does not constitute independent coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: per , , ,  and .  The nomination is flawed because  states that the subject "''does not need to be the main topic of the source material.''" and so the source about Standard Life is fine.  It is easy to find more sources covering the subject such as this https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transactions-of-the-faculty-of-actuaries/article/andrew-rutherford-davidson-1890-1968/D4B982EE16AC0B13BC0595341E39150B detailed obituary or this https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=32m8DgAAQBAJ general history
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:ATD||WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE||WP:SIGCOV)