Deletion of Shabana Latif

Comment: regretfully, per my comment above. There simply isn't enough coverage to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: satisfying / alone is not sufficient grounds to have a separate article. At the top of  it states "subjects of standalone articles should meet the General Notability Guideline. The guideline on this page provides bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline." In this case the guidance clearly fails because the subject does not meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:CRIN||WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: I agonised over this one because this is the kind of athlete for whom the presumption of notability in  is helpful. Surely an international cricketer would be the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources? But I guess not. As https://books.google.com.au/books?id=EXXGBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA432&lpg=PA432&dq=shabana+latif+cricket&source=bl&ots=AowL9Ic4M1&sig=ACfU3U3MrQvlQHYOGttYib7M_4Njulrs1A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjli4Gop43kAhVGb30KHYwECas4ChDoATAAegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=shabana%20latif%20cricket&f=false this book linked in the nomination statement makes clear, Shabana was selected at Number 11 but didn't bowl. Nor did she score a single run in four career matches. In the author's words: "Like so many players in social cricket, it looks as though they were making up the numbers." Other than that, the sources tell us little about her. We know that she is from Peshawar or somewhere near there and had to convince her parents to let her play.https://espn.com.au/cricket/story/_/id/23130547/stumps-dawn But for whom did she play locally? Did she bat, bowl or both? What is she doing now? Is she still alive? These are the kinds of questions that a biography would answer. They are the kind of questions that significant coverage in reliable sources would answer. For completeness, I tried a hack search in Urdu, hoping that it would bear out the presumption of notability in , but I couldn't find anything. Others may have more luck, in which case ping me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATH||WP:ATH)

Comment: Meets . As I said on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariam Anwar, otability (sports) seems somewhat contradictory about requiring subjects to also meet . At the top of the page it says "The article should provide reliable sources showing that the subject meets the general notability guideline '''or''' the sport specific criteria set forth below. If the article '''does''' meet the criteria set forth below, then it is '''likely''' that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. Failing to meet the criteria in this guideline means that notability will need to be established in other ways." (My emphases.) According to my reading of this, she is presumed notable, having played "at the highest international or domestic level", and therefore "it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article". Those sources may not be online, but we do have sources online that verify her name and the games she has played in, which is sufficient for an article. The bit that requires  is in Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Applicable_policies_and_guidelines and says "In addition, the subjects of standalone articles should meet the General Notability Guideline." That seems to be intended as a blanket statement about standalone articles on any topic, and is highly questionable - ACADEMIC does ''not'' require subjects to also meet . And,  states "A topic is presumed to merit an article if: It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right". So in fact, it could be argued that this article is in line with the  policy - it meets a subject-specific guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: No sorry, this has got ridiculous now. Okay, delete "A. Smith" with one first-class appearance in 1798. No problem with that. But to delete international cricketers who have played Test/ODI/T20I level. Nah, that's just stupid and disruptive. Easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: meets . "Making up the numbers" is a little harsh here. She was selected to be part of the Pakistan women's national squad for a series against the West Indies, playing in five full international matches (four ODIs and a Test
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)