Deletion of Do not feed the animals

Comment: I've been trying to find a redirect target, and failing, so this is the next best option. I don't feel ''this phrase itself'' meets , merely the concept - and an article about the concept shouldn't be tied to this specific phrase. When it is found or made, though, a redirect would be appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Well, it looks like ThaddeusB beat me to the punch. I came back after researching the policy to see the above comment. I agree 100% as it falls under . What needs to happen here is that the term must be shown to be more than just a term. The social influence of the term should be established as just because it exists as a term does not make it notable. I did a quick search but could not find the sources talking about significance of the term
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WORDISSUBJECT)

Comment: as one of those core articles that belong in Wikipedia  Clearly, by the |sheer number and depth of potential citations, this is a |notable phrase.  Per SmokeyJoe, this is the sort of thing that Wikipedia ought to cover
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Additional !votes (going either way) are of course still welcome. However, it's worth noting  and . -- Special:Contributions/202.124.88.20|202.124.88.20
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LOUSYTITLE||WP:HEY)