Deletion of Futurekids

Comment: The goal here is not to challenge legitimate material, but make certain that we |properly cite |verifiable |reliable sources, usually nontrivial unbiased third-party sources which have notability of their own (e.g. Bob's website would not be considered reliable even if it is unbiased). -&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:VERIFY||WP:RS)

Comment: This subject clearly has enough mention is second party sources to pass  criteria. I can see no valid reason to suggest deletion or assume bad faith as the nominator has done. --neonwhite
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY)

Comment: I find Futurekids pages in many languages and countries using Google, but nearly impossible to locate unibased third-party notable coverage.  I suspect that an organization this big/widespread '''''might''''' be notable per , but without |proper sourcing through |reliable sources, and with the persistence of {{User|SIWC}} in using non-neutral prose it may be impossible to keep. -&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:VERIFY||WP:RS)