Deletion of Kundalini syndrome

Comment: Google hit counts are irrelevant, of course. It lacks ''independent'' sources; it is a |POV fork promoting notions that haven't a chance of being retained in the main article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per nom, and  as well - so little notice outside the ranks of the believers I can't even find a debunking
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Haven't read all those lines, but seems like , to me. Kundalini article mentions the "syndrome" as well. Anything useful/valuable can be merged to Kundalini
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:REDUNDANTFORK)

Comment: per nom, needs more |reliable sources to meet our 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: This articles fails the |general notability guideline and lacks significant coverage in |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)