Deletion of Differences in versions of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (2nd nomination)

Comment: the material seems to be sourced to the works themselves, in my opinion going through them and making the comparisons/ noting differences in this way constitutes |original thought. I cannot find any evidence that the differences between the versions have been the topic of independent |reliable sources which would allow for an article based on a |neutral, |verifiable framework - not one based on |original research. Being harmless is not a good reason for keeping an article, #TRAVELGUIDE|travel guides, #DIRECTORY|directories and |myspace pages are all pretty harmless - it does not mean Wikipedia should #WEBHOST|host them or that they belong as part of a high-quality, free encyclopaedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:OR||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:MYSPACE||WP:NOT)

Comment: Well-intentioned but basically a monolithic violation of , specifically .  No secondary sources as mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as there are |no reliable, third party sources, but willing '''reconsider''' should that change
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)