Deletion of Moses Farrow

Comment: Moses Farrow has been the subject of intense news coverage at three points in the last 20 years: during his dramatic courtroom testimony and subsequent media interviews in 1994, during his headline-grabbing denunciation of Mia Farrow in the 2000s, and - most recently - during his defense of Woody Allen in 2014. This is not a case of  or ; Farrow has (1) been the subject of news coverage for statements he has made, and not simply for being the child of someone notable, and (2) has not been in the news for a single event, but for 3 distinct and spatially separate events. If Wikipedia were a print encyclopedia and space were at a premium, yes, Moses Farrow is not Dorothy Hamill or Jimmy Carter. But it's not. He meets criteria sufficient to at least warrant a stub
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:BLP1E)