Deletion of Matt Dillahunty (3rd nomination)

Comment: per . The article is a patchwork collection of |non-reliable sources, speakers bureau write-ups, primary sources, and American Atheists Convention news. The articles that do quote him, such as ''Evolution News'' and ''Christian Today'', are better suited as sources for ''The Atheist Experience'', not Dillahunty himself. The article should also be tagged for overly-promotional writing; it reads like a |resume of Dillahunty's activities, with some of his favorite quotes thrown in for good measure. Rather than take information from independent sources and make an article out of it, the page writers appear to be gathering any and all sources to back up each point that they wish to make to present Dillahunty as a notable person. Numerous sources only mention Dillahunty in passing. The ''Austin American-Statesman'' piece and the Dutch article does not "significant coverage in reliable sources" make. Dillahunty already has his own paragraph at ''The Atheist Experience''; that's where he belongs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:RESUME)