Deletion of Michel Bakhoum

Comment: per nom, but this is subject to revision.   is the appropriate guideline here.  If verifiable sources exist to show that he meets these criteria, if the article is reformatted to Wikipedia standards, if the Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles#Avoid_peacock_and_weasel_terms|peacock words of the last paragraph and the Arabic text (except for Dr Bakhoum's name) are removed, it might become an acceptable article; as it stands, it isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: a total of about 20 http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=CYBA%2CCYBA%3A2006-12%2CCYBA%3Aen&q=%22Michel+Bakhoom%22+-street+-st+-str+-wikipedia+-answers.com&btnG=Search  http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=CYBA%2CCYBA%3A2006-12%2CCYBA%3Aen&q=%22Michel+Bakhoum%22+-street+-st+-str+-wikipedia+-answers.com&btnG=Search  ghits under both versions of his surname helps him fail  David<span
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Copyvio of the late professor's apparently reasonably popular english language textbook, including listing his major professional society memberships.  The original copyvio article establishes that Bakhoum meets  notability, under several categories.  The current article does not, but there is a difference between "Doesn't meet" and "Article doesn't currently show how they meet".  Subject just has to be notable.   Is the current article a CV, or just weak?  It does not appear to contain the earlier CV quotes from the book.  What are unresolved nomination criteria for this deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)