Deletion of Agostino von Hassell

Comment: per above. Nothing dictates notability under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The article subject is an author, so  applies.  Any of the 4 tests there would indicate notability. 1) "Important figure" - no indication of that. 2) Originated "significant new concept" - no. 3) "Well-known work" - no. 4) "Significant monument" - no.  The "reviews" of his cookbook are rather weak. The publisher sent a review copy to the Secretary of Defense and a standard response came back.http://www.unprsouth.com/rumsfeldanswermhl.htm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: fails .  There is nothing significant about him.  The two |sources are not reliable - both are freebie newspapers that have zero editorial independence (citing the Falun Gong/right-wing propaganda mouthpiece ''The Epoch Times'' makes somebody negatively notable, if that were possible). He's written some monographs, but there's no evidence they are cited widely; in fact, a Google scholar research shows between two and six cites per work, so he'd fail |the prof test.  Normally, the numbers of library holdings matter, as does {{U|DGG}}'s views, but I'm skeptical in this case, since one would expect more than a couple of cites if it were held in 500 libraries.  The |gratuitous and trivial mention of a distant relative does not make him notable, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:PROF||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Does not meet , and as John Nagle detailed, does not meet any of the  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)