Deletion of Alis Rowe (3rd nomination)

Comment: just wondering if the nominator or any of the "deleters" above carried out any searches for sources (although it could be argued that the article already has enough)? "Thats a bit harsh coola!" well, a quick search with the goog brings up the following: from ''The Independent'' - https://www.independent.co.uk/extras/indybest/books/best-books-about-autism-a8712096.html "8 Best Books About Autism .. ''Asperger’s Syndrome And Communication'' by Alis Rowe .. It has simple pictures, is written concisely, and is also useful for people not on the spectrum.", National Autistic Society - https://www.autism.org.uk/get-involved/media-centre/news/2019-01-23-autism-awards-finalists.aspx "Revealed: Finalists of our Autism Professionals Awards (23 January 2019).. One of the most important categories is Achievement by an Individual on the Autism Spectrum. This year’s finalists are: Alis Rowe, founder of the Curly Hair Project; ..", and National Diversity Awards - https://ablemagazine.co.uk/national-diversity-awards-nominee-alis-rowe/ "With such a strong impact being made by Alis in such a short time, there is absolutely no surprise as to why she has been shortlisted for the Entrepreneur of Excellence award at the National Diversity Awards 2014." (this source is cited in the article not sure why this award is not mentioned), so with these i reckon its even more of a '''keep''' as meeting no. 2 of  in the field of autism
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Does not seem notable enough per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: ping|Coolabahapple}} I think you may be scraping the notability barrel a bit there, the English Wikipedia specifically asks for extensive coverage in independent sources, a book review, a couple of niche awards and a few mentions in niche publications don't make a person notable, only borderline notable. I think most of us agree that the quality of this encyclopaedia won't be significantly negated for losing the article. Plus the subject of this article has requested that the article be removed so she can regain a bit of privacy, therefore  applies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: this will probably be a "delete" ("duh, coola, anyone for |snowies?"), however ("here goes contrarian coola again!"), (1) I note that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alis Rowe (2nd nomination)|the previous afd was closed as an uncontroversal "keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: The last AFD mentioned the Huffington Post article that gives significant coverage of her https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/women-with-autism-spectrum-disorder_uk_56e9744de4b096ed3adcaef7?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJGmA5z30UkvZQT0zh0N5YuRLDeh-mcCrcE_TwR71wvieswkilLx6WEImTQ0UwFMH15rS3YwNCH6wIM3jjobSeYloc7cLrFIJiCOj5NlQPpTj8pS6kLKbHoShxurqB3UVTJu_dLUa2CZuJp9XdOwzE_VwMr21PUh1DgHLMHH_z9a.  I see South West Londoner covering her http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/curly-hair-project-founder-helps-lift-weight-autism/ but not entirely sure about that as a reliable source.  Google news search shows them, and 20 Wikipedia articles reference them already, and they have editor oversight and seem legitimate.  The Marie Claire article without doubt is significant coverage in a reliable source, I reading the copy she has on her website where she list that and some of the other places she's been mentioned https://thegirlwiththecurlyhair.co.uk/about-us/in-the-press/. Able Magazine counts towards meeting the  as well.  So does Healthy Magazine https://www.healthy-magazine.co.uk/, it a subscription publication.  Her official website shows the article, you not able to find it on their official website without paying to subscribe
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)