Deletion of Khalil al-Mughrabi

Comment: as the incident lacks  and #NEWS. Will not comment on  but it points the general conensus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOT||WP:OCE)

Comment: per Zero.  Leaving aside all the partisan sniping and waving around of the mutilated corpses of innocent children that's happening above, this topic is hugely covered in reliable sources on an ongoing basis.  The decision we're making here must be based on that rather than on the state of the article now.  If the nominator was serious, rather than trying to make some kind of point, then  doesn't seem to have been adhered to so very closely.  The nominator's tacit linking of this with other deletion discussions makes me doubt good faith.   is bad enough for !voters, but should most definitely not appear in a nomination statement.&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: the death of the subject appears to be what is notable. If it weren't for the death the subject would not be notable, therefore how this really should be considered is under  (and possibly also ), and the event does appear to pass . Therefore the article should be appropriately renamed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:BLP1E||WP:EFFECT)

Comment: the entire article relies on only 3 references.  2 of these references are from B'tselem, which is anti-Israel, and has been heavily criticized for its bias and often distortion.  The other reference is from UNRWA, an organization devoted specifically for Palestinians, and may constitute .  The references are terrible and heavily biased, and they form the basis of the article. Thus, I call for it to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)