Deletion of Philip Needleman

Comment: subject is presumed notable as per  #1, #2, #3, #5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: as noted by the others, a clear pass of  #3, and also probably under  #1 (as the winner of major awards) and  #1 (for his significant impact on pharmacology R&D, attested to in sources such as http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucebooth/2013/03/27/phil-needlemans-ten-commandments-of-drug-rd/http://www.nasonline.org/news-and-multimedia/podcasts/interviews/philip-needleman.htmlhttp://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/2775.aspx
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:ANYBIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: his article meets: otability (academics) Criteria 1,2,3, and 5 after five minutes search, and likely two more of the nine in twenty minutes work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Not only does he easily fit under  #3, he's also won an significant NAS award and under #5 is a named chair at a major institution of higher education.  This doesn't belong here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)