Deletion of A. W. Kjellstrand

Comment: I don't like the blind nomination of an entire category of Wikipedia articles, which indicates little or no adherence to our strong recommendations set out in . Moreover, the fact is that would erase an entire collegiate coaching history for ''one school only'' under only the flimsiest of pretexts, more or less "I don't think any of these are notable," although without  being followed for each, there is no way of telling. The nominator is guessing and so am I — there is probably sufficient published sourcing out there for each, Keep them all... If the nominator feels strongly enough about this matter to follow  for each an then to nominate those seeming to fail GNG one by one, I would be amenable to putting similar effort into each defense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: without prejudice to renominate article subjects individually.  This is obviously a mix of notable and non-notable persons who require individual AfDs to determine their notability and suitability for stand-alone Wikipedia articles.  At least one of these subjects (Elmer Schaake) played in the National Football League (see http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SchaEl20.htm Pro-Football-Reference.com) and is entitled to a presumption of notability per .  Mass AfDs should only be used when the nominator editor has done his homework and has a very high degree of confidence that all subjects are either non-notable or violate other WP policies and guidelines.  Such is not the case here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGRIDIRON)