Deletion of Paul Jenkins (fighter)

Comment: Step away from going directly to the MMA guidelines as that only further defines general notability. First, does he meet ? Looking at generally notability, I would say yes (barely), but not like he would want. According to the Bleacher Report, he holds the record (actually he is 2nd) for most losses by TKO http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1068142-the-10-most-dubious-records-in-mma/page/4. There is also coverage in http://www.mmauniverse.com/mma-news/paul-jenkins-to-headline-house-of-pain-10 MMA Universe for what it is worth. The article in its current form is too promotional. I say strip it down to what the references say, create it as a stub, and make it about what he is notable for (losing fights
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Another fight with no  and 2 top tier fights shy of meeting . I had to remove several references that did not even mention Jenkins (in fact 3 of them did not even lead to pages that existed nor did Google have archived). The remaining sources are only event listing results with nothing focused on Jenkins
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NMMA)

Comment: Since he fails to meet  and no one has provided any sources that show he meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails to meet  and .  He lacks both notable MMA fights and significant non-routine coverage. Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMMA||WP:GNG)

Comment: Narrowly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)