Deletion of Shane Bugbee

Comment: I think it's pretty telling that he refers to this ''article'' as his "''profile''" &mdash; as if Wikipedia were some kind of Myspace-like site. Run down the list of Wikipedia:Criteria_for_inclusion_of_biographies#Alternative_tests|alternative tests at  &mdash; Mr. Bugbee doesn't pass any of them, with the possible exception of expandability. Taken with the things others have pointed out about the questionability of any involvement at all in a lot of his purported accomplishments, it would take a lot to convince me that this person is notable enough to warrant a biographical article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: You're right, it doesn't. In this case, the article is a non-notable () case of self-promotion () and is a textbook example of a vanity page (
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:SPAM||WP:VAIN)

Comment: On what basis do you claim that he is not notable, given the evidence in the external links that weighs against your claim? He passes  easily. Which criteria of  does he fail? Why do you call it as "Myspace type webpage?" It would be helpful if you could provide specifics
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: I hate to dominate the discussion here, (though I started this and I intend to see it through) but to be fair, he fails every single criteria of . He has no widely recognized contributions in the field of politics, athletics, or entertainment, obviously. The only thing he even comes close to is publisher/author, but he has won no awards and has only one review that could be considered notable. He also fails the alternative tests of google hits, autobiography, verifiability, and the 100 years test. If we included everyone who has even been on a tour of any kind or has ever written a book... well, this deletion seems like a no-brainer
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)