Deletion of Sports engineering

Comment: Per above. |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: as no valid reason for deletion has been stated. Very nearly all of our articles are incomplete,  says nothing relevant to this topic, the article cites sources per  and the rest of the nomination statement is equally devoid of any valid reasoning. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:REF)

Comment: meets , this is an established field of sports (just like, for example, sports medicine), universities study it, there are firms and people who specialise in it, books are written about it, journals specialise in it (here is another one in addition to the one mentioned above http://pip.sagepub.com/ Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, http://www.sportsengineering.org/about-us/about-the-isea/ organisations that represent it, and so on and so on, we could probably have a taskforce/workgroup or even a whole project dedicated to this .. if only we had more editors(sigh
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  - or how do you play golf with out a ball at a major tournament
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)