Deletion of Bryan Caplan (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'll concentrate on the academic work, in particular {{tq|The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.}} from . Look at the Google scholar profile page https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EeYe2EAAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao here. This is a widely cited scholar, for instance, his book ''The myth of the rational voter'' by Princeton University Press has 879 citations. He has been widely published in many econ journals as well, including ''Public Choice'', ''Journal of Law and Economics'', ''The American Economic Review''. His h-index is 26, which is quite high, if one looks at the h-index WP page, {{tq|The London School of Economics found that full professors in the social sciences had average h-indices ranging from 2.8 (in law), through 3.4 (in political science), 3.7 (in sociology), 6.5 (in geography) and 7.6 (in economics).}}. See https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.person.hindex.html this list of economists by h-index. The list is incomplete; Caplan doesn't show up on it, but he would be in the top 400 based on the h-index. Other parts of  also apply, but this should be enough to demonstrate notability, in my opinion. If people think that Caplan is too widely quoted on Wikipedia, even in places which aren't appropriate, by all means remove or replace their mentions. Deleting a BLP page is inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)