Deletion of Heaven and Hell (band)

Comment: supergroups are inherently notable enough to merit Wikipedia articles per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: A quick Google News search came up with a number of references to the reunion, including this one http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/15848267.htm in a major US-based daily newspaper. The "crystal ball" clause in  begins with: ''Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation.'' This isn't unverifiable, nor is it speculation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: superceding "Not Sure" comment above).  I honestly still think it's marginal.  The reunion will surely be notable if it does take place, but so far all we really have is an expression of desire by the potential participants.  Desires, especially among such a small group, can easily change (and indeed, there's been at least one substitution in the planned line-up already).  But the expressions of desire seem ''fairly'' firm, and it has been picked up and reported by secondary sources (which addresses any |verifiability issues). This ''might'' be notable (due to secondary coverage) even if it never takes place, which is why I said "keep", but it also might not, which is why I said "weak
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)