Deletion of Irish E-Sports

Comment: another edit conflict) Wikipedia's |deletion policy states that ''These processes are ''not'' decided through a head count, so participants are encouraged to explain their opinion and refer to policy'' and that ''it is considered inappropriate to ask people outside of Wikipedia to come to the discussion in order to sway its outcome. |Such comments may be ignored
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:MEAT)

Comment: of note in the gaming community might make it suitable for a game website. But at Wikipedia, there is a |notability guideline that requires coverage in reliable third-party sources to be considered suitable for inclusion. Without such sources, the article cannot meet our standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as failing  due to the absence of |reliable sources to |verify the claims of notability. I would remind Dixy79 and Oisinjm that any discussion of notability should be within the |community definition, not their own personal ones and to Polar Ice I would point out that to avoid #A7|an A7 speedy deletion an article only needs to  ''assert'' notability however in order to be kept long-term it must be |shown to meet the specific community guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GROUP||WP:RS||WP:VER||WP:NOTE||WP:CSD||WP:VER)

Comment: After looking and searching hard, there is a lack of |reliable sources establishing the significant coverage needed in the . It is also noted that all reasons to keep as stated above are virtually  claims that provide no verifiablity from reliable sources to back that up, while others are just obvious |canvassing attempts from SPAs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:CANVASS)