Deletion of Keith Johnson (author)

Comment: I had a go at improving this article in 2013, and 3+ years later no-one has written anything substantial about the subject. It fails , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Although the article has been ed, not a single one suggests the subject passes  or the . &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: as . Johnson writes introductory textbooks and produces visual teaching aids.  Quite a few of the sources are teaching tools (#56 is a good example http://www.corsavy.co.uk/).  Others are dead (#27 " "School Science Review Article". School Science Review. SSR Vol 60, No. 212, 1979, 562) Citation #11 does lead to a list of genuine reviews on Johnson's personal webpage of the teaching tools he produces in journals such as "Association for Science Education : School Science Review" (the first one linked) is interesting because the Bold purple highlighting of the words "of such excellent quality and durability" refers to the physical quality of the "overlays" for use in an old-fashioned overhead projector; not to the caliber of the book itself.  I did not click every one of the 58 citations (many are dead, others conspicuous primary sources, such as the publishers)  What I did not see was any coverage of Johnson himself, or of his career, or an indication that any of the teaching tools or textbooks he has written are at all notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)