Deletion of Troll (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: though I admit this requires editors to think outside the box a bit. Before I get to that, as always,  is a concern. There doesn't seem to have been any tagging, clean-up, discussion of the article, or review of the history before this was nominated. Because there was - on the day of the nomination - a concerted effort by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: if more sources are found, otherwise '''merge''' to Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: per the sources provided by other editors, which in aggregate seem to scrape the  threshold of coverage in my opinion. If the concern is that the article has too much fancruft material, that could be trimmed as an editorial concern, not a ground for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per sources listed above, which meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)