Deletion of 911 controversy

Comment: to 9/11 conspiracy theories.  This one reads like an essay and violates 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per nom, .  Advocacy page that belongs on an op-ed blog, not in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: to 9/11 conspiracy theories. Current content fails  and , is clear |original research, and is controversial enough that we shouldn't give it the benefit of the doubt. Merge any useful content, delete the rest (unless sources are added
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:NPOV||WP:NOR)