Deletion of Murder of Agnes Sina-Inakoju

Comment: it's been covered in mainstream media, including the BBC and the Guardian, so seems to fairly clearly meet .https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/12/gang-members-teenage-girls-murderhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12996621http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1266478/Girl-16-dies-shot-neck-takeaway-drug-turf-war.htmlhttp://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/02/08/agnes-sina-inakojus-brother-in-appeal-to-gangs_n_1261949.html I'm not sure quite what the nominator means by "an unremarkable crime". It is notability that guides us, not remarkableness. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: a murder that has garnered .  '''Note''' that I added a search bar using a more likely term
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Tragic, yes. Notable, no. Clearly falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Sources consist of routine coverage of a murder and follow-up fate of perpetrators. Fails based on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: a tragic, but ultimately routine event. Fails . No lasting significance or societal impact; see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING)