Deletion of Homogenized milk and atherosclerosis

Comment: this article is a mess, and it's hard to see how to rescue it. The references are of generally low-quality or are used in a manner that represents |synthesis; the reference formatting is wrong as well. A huge effort would be needed to extract the small amount of encyclopedic content from the rest, and refactor to represent scientific consensus
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: The hypothesis of the link between XO and atheroschlerosis is notable - see ''http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6362227 Xanthine oxidase in homogenized cow's milk and Oster's hypothesis: a review''.  The theory doesn't seem to have panned out but this is the normal scientific method, not pseudoscience.  If the article needs work then this is a matter of normal editing.  Deletion would be disruptive to this, removing the edit history and contents in an indiscriminate way.  If the nominator feels himself unable to write upon the topic, he should please not presume to dismiss it.  Note that homogenized milk doesn't even exist as a proper page and just redirects to a poor general article about  homogenization.  But there's a little bit about the topic at milk#Creaming_and_homogenization and so an obvious |alternative to deletion is a redirect to that section.  How hard is that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)