Deletion of Stephan Kinsella (4th Nomination)

Comment: WP:NOTTEMPORARY|Notability is not temporary. Leaving aside Kinsella's authorship or editorship of multiple legal texts published by Oxford University Press (http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780379215229.do#.UW6p56LqnHQ 1, http://web.archive.org/web/20050205234822/http://www.oceanalaw.com/main_product_details.asp?ID=293 2, http://web.archive.org/web/20121023232305/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/ContractandGeneralCommercialLaw/ElectronicCommerce/?view=usa&ci=9780379215199 3, http://web.archive.org/web/20070219083421/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/IntellectualProperty/IntellectualProperty/?view=usa&ci=9780379012699 4, http://web.archive.org/web/20070219081545/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/ContractandGeneralCommercialLaw/?view=usa&ci=9780379010008 5), Kinsella's 2001 journal article "Against Intellectual Property" has garnered numerous citations and substantial discussion in various scholarly journals and law reviews since its publication (See Google Scholar search http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=12031655706693708690&as_sdt=5,28&sciodt=0,28&hl=en here). It is not accurate to assert that all these mentions have been in Mises Institute-related publications, as they include the ''Texas Law Review'', ''Ecology Law Quarterly'', ''UC Davis Law Review'', ''California Law Review'', ''South Carolina Law Review'', ''Public Finance Review'', ''University of Memphis Law Review'', ''Journal of Business Ethics'', ''European Journal of International Relations'', ''Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Review'', ''Oeconomica'', ''International Journal of Social Economics'', ''International Review of Business Research'', ''The Journal of World Intellectual Property'', ''Global Public Health'', ''Berkeley Technology Law Journal'', ''UCLA Journal of Law & Technology'', and others. Even if all his mentions were by other Austrians, I disagree with the nominator that this would render these mentions unworthy of consideration for purposes of establishing notability. Yes, Austrians will be more often cited by Austrians than by others, Marxist economists will more often be cited by other Marxist economists, etc. So what? This is not clearly related to the question of Kinsella's notability, but the assertion by the nom that Austrians would not be considered economists by other economists is clearly incorrect, as there are literally hundreds of Austrians in tenured or tenure-track positions in economics departments around the world, and they were not all hired by other Austrians. Additionally, Frank Fetter, sometimes called "the American Austrian," was an eminent scholar recognized by economists of all schools as a notable figure in the history of economic thought. This sidenote from the nom attacking the Austrian School leads me to believe that this nomination may be an example of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)