Deletion of Brendan McConville (2nd nomination)

Comment: Similar to my vote on this matter this summer, I still think he's notable under . I think he could still be notable as a professor, and I notice that we very rarely delete articles of full professors at reputable universities, but I think the case for  is a little more clear. In addition to the reviews of his work, http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=brendan+mcconville&qt=results_page this WorldCat search indicates that one of his books is held in >500 libraries and another is held in >300
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Well, he did have a media moment in 2011 http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/06/sarah-palin-paul-revere-fact-checking-/1#.VQNZPWan2Hk on the coattails of Sarah Palin and Paul Revere, when he was quoted in both  American and British papers.  But more ot the point, he passes reative by dint of being the author of widely and respectfully reviewed books.  And, in my opinion, passes  because of being widely cited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:PROF)