Deletion of MAHANAYIKA

Comment: to closer: See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: with an expressed disappoint in the lack of |due diligence on the parts of {{u|ArtsRescuer}}, and {{u|SwisterTwister}}. In looking it was quite easy to find the topic of this film has |required media coverage to meet . And while the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahanayika&type=revision&diff=718300105&oldid=712418593 '''stub''' first nominated was |quite poor, it is more often easier to fix than to |delete and re-write from scratch. The article's https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahanayika&type=revision&diff=721705410&oldid=712418593 improvement to well-sourced '''start-class''' is undeniable... so come on folks, let's all thank {{u|Titodutta}} and {{u|GSS-1987}} for showing the topic's |potential
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NF||WP:UGLY||WP:TNT||WP:POTENTIAL)