Deletion of Yeshivat Shaare Torah

Comment: In my opinion, this discussion has been badly contaminated by a series of falsehoods that {{u|Wiki-Coffee}} has been spreading about Yeshivat Shaare Torah, both here and at illage pump (policy). This editor has stated the school's enrollment is 60 half day students. That is false. The fact is that this organization operates a preschool program, a boys elementary school, a girls elementary school, a boys high school and a girls high school, with a combined enrollment of well over 1000 students. The editor claims that it is a profit making business. That is false. The organization is a registered tax exempt non-profit educational group. The editor claims that the only sources available about the organization are self published. That is false. I have added eleven independent references which verify the claims made in the article. Anyone who wants to cite Yeshivat Shaare Torah as an example of why we need to delete articles about secondary schools should rethink their position. Instead, it is an example of failure to properly research the topic before nominating an article for deletion, and a willingness to rely on falsehoods in an enthusiastic drive to delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/23/nyregion/23grate.html indicates that this isn't actually a high school (it's described as a half-day school with just 60 students at the Village Pump), but rather an educational organization with several components, including a private K–8 school with hundreds of students.  I therefore don't think that "it's a high school, so vote my way on it" is a relevant line of argument.  I have found some minor sources in local press:  http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/ywn-videos/286186/watch-yeshiva-headmaster-defends-security-guard-who-roughed-up-man.html  However, in ten minutes of searching, I've not been able to find independent sources that provide a basic description of the organization (the sort needed for  compliance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WHYN)

Comment: Passes  and . I do find it odd that the RfC says  is correct but we can't say why. So I'm saying why anyway and invoking  since "Keep but I can't tell you why" is not how we build an encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES||WP:IAR)