Deletion of Comparison of Object Pascal and C++

Comment: The reference shows it is not OR, and primary sources can be used under certain conditions (see ). But the article will need an introduction, as per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:NOTJOURNAL)

Comment: Did {{user|Timtrent}} consider a merge to Object Pascal  nominating for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: that the referenced source for this is a set of pretty much identical tables. This makes it a borderline . However, if the topic is deemed to be notable and to remain then there is no way of avoiding similar tables in source and Wikipedia article. The comparison ''is'' the comparison. Having read the source I am in two minds about Speedy Deletion as a copyright violation. I am 55:45 in favour of letting the AfD run its course on this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)