Deletion of Unst Bus Shelter

Comment: per  2.4 "''nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course''".  The nomination tells us that a redirect was preferred but redirects are a matter of ordinary editing not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: Nominated for AfD within ''30 minutes'' of article creation http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unst_Bus_Shelter&action=historysubmit&diff=405344784&oldid=405341244 and it seems WP:BEFORE was not adhered to.  The refs indicated passing .  The "per " is curious as a topic only "fails"  if it is unverifiable, which is not the case with this topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: It is clear this is headed to keep and I am happy for someone to close it early per . I remain surprised by the responses - perhaps the nomination was misunderstood: I proposed to delete the article because there is better coverage already at Unst; I did not propose to delete the subject entirely from Wikipedia. To me the subject seems intrinsically to be part of the Unst article: as noted above, its something peculiar to the area so it really belongs with it - and it's not something that is likely to form part of a series of such articles. Never-the-less I will go with consensus for a separate article and merge in the existing content from Unst, and replace the existing text with an internal link
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)