Deletion of Putin khuilo!

Comment: as there cannot be any '''secondary''' sources able to judge the song's impact.  The song's surrounding context is ongoing, so all sources are primary by definition, and we |cannot predict whether solid secondary sources will be published at a later date.  "Der Führer's Face" is notable because it's been discussed by secondary sources, which looked back at the song and could judge its impact from a distance, and such sources clearly can't exist yet for this song
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BALL)

Comment: There is ample evidence that it passes  and  and it is not 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: not every protest song is notable - this one is sort of |run of the mill, from what I can see, beside the nasty tone.  FWIW, I agree with the sentiment of the song if not its words - or its alleged notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: That's weird. They delete articles about large companies, rivers, bridges, as irrelevant, but keep this strange stuff. This chant contains just 2 words (one of them is pretty bad, by the way), it is not widespread (except for Ukrainian football fans), and has no significance. Which is even more important, this article is a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: this is definitely not a  and the term was mentioned lots of times by different World medias. At this moment it is an important part of story and helps get proper understanding of events and people's reactions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: This song seems to have caused a diplomatic incident. Due to the Foreign Minister singing it to stave off an angry crowd, the incident is actually very notable (a diplomatic crisis), even if the song is crass and not exactly a cleverly written poem. If you wanted to turn this into "Putin Khuilo diplomatic incident" that would be a compromise I would be willing to support. If it turns out that Putin Khuilo is the Ukrainian version of "Give Peace a Chance|All we are saying is give peace a chance" / "Make love, not war" then we would be silly to delete reference to it altogether, but for now it seems to be a fairly new chant that is definitely making a lot of news. Is there an article about Chants and slogans related to Ukranian and Russian conflict, akin to List of Maoist China rhetoric and political slogans. Also, it might be informative for people to read the  essay and understand how wikipedia incorporates fast-moving news stories. Peace
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: The relevant criteria is : "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject1 of multiple, non-trivial2 published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label". http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/06/16/khuilo-the-offensive-term-that-has-attached-itself-to-putin/ This is one such source. If more sources can be found (I can't read Ukrainian so can't comment on the sources in the article) then my keep !vote would be stronger
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: this is definitely not a  and a lots of people tries to find info about subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)