Deletion of List of Dragonlance creatures

Comment: to Dragonlance#World - Entirely in-universe plot summary, almost completely referenced to primary sources.  The one secondary source is only being used to support the statement that "The dragons of Dragonlance appear much as their counterparts in other Dungeons & Dragons worlds", which is not much to establish notability for this list.  Searching for additional sources discussing the overall concept of creatures or races specific to Dragonlance is not turning up much in reliable, secondary sources that would allow this to pass .  The main article on the setting does already briefly cover some of the races/creatures unique to Dragonlance (i.e. Draconians, Kender, etc.), but if someone wanted to expand it slightly with some of the material here, that would probably be fine
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: based on sources added to the article, or at worst ''' Merge''' to Dragonlance#World as per above, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: a massive list of mostly non-notable characters, sourced essentially exclusively to primary sources, that fails  and . I am not seeing anything of value to merge, and the article title is not a plausible redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:PLOT)

Comment: as mostly non-notable characters that don't pass the . Some of these have notable articles and agree with some editors that we could add these see also in the main Dragonlance article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and possible rename, or in the worst case '''merge''': The article ''currently'' has a disproportionately large amount of plot-summary and primary sourced content. But the ''topic'', intelligent species in ''Dragonlance'', is treated in at least one secondary source, ''https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=FvlWCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=races+dragonlance&ots=H-23wsECsw&sig=rM-dItDgYiNLYtz1kWzXglDTA7g&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=dragonlance&f=false Race and Popular Fantasy Literature: Habits of Whiteness'', directly and in some detail. There are also a number of secondary sources about the individual entries, and this article is and has been a merge target for a number of articles with a coverage threshold below a separate article, like Draconian, or the Talk:Dragonlance#Proposed merge of Kender (Dragonlance) into Dragonlance|currently discussed Kender (Dragonlance). Lastly, a number of the listed entries have related articles, another reason for a list to exist. That together in my opinion makes the article worth keeping, though I am not sure if "creatures" is the best description. Even if this is not seen as meeting , there are now parts worth preserving
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: as failing multiple fundamental policies. Articles are #PLOT details that have been esized into an article by editorial observation. Dragonlance#World would be an appropriate place to cover a summary of any creatures that are highly significant to the fiction, and I would accept a summary and merge if it helps produce a consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SYNTH)