Deletion of Nicole Sheridan

Comment: per , especially since she's won two AVN Awards in different years. If PORNBIO is deprecated, why is it still listed at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: as nominator.  There's simply no there, there. The few awards don't confer notability, per . Please do not use the Porn WikiProject's now-deprecated Pornbio criteria. Even if not deprecated, they The criteria in  are not a way of evading . If they were still in force, they would be the They are the start of the conversation, not the dispositive end of it. If a BLP meets  but fails ,  controls. The stage name seems calculated to play off of the name Nicolette Sheridan but that's hardly notable, and no source is cited to suggest it is. Appearing in porn with a husband who has a colorful stage name is not notable either, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG||WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:INHERIT)

Comment: per  or per  (criteria#1). AVN Awards are not "paltry" awards, are undoubtedly the most known and most relevant awards in adult industry. And the argument about unreliable sources is a typical Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEIT#Unreliable_sources |argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Finally, this is not a case of , her stage name is similar to Nicolette Sheridan, Ok, but who cares? This is not the first nor the last case of a stage name chosen to remind, honor or exploit someone else's fame and Wikipedia wasn't created to judge stage names
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:ANYBIO||WP:INHERIT)

Comment: per meeting  and . And to the nominator: the GNG does not trump other guidelines. As
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: She has won two awards which are significant in her field.  Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Our readings of the interplay between  and  differ. In this case, I believe  trumps . My  citation is about her husband, not Nicolette. I did not intend to say AVN awards are paltry, but rather that these two, one of them a group award, are paltry. The hard-and-fast (yikes, pun NOT intended) 2 awards rule suggested by PORNBIO is one of its great weaknesses. And in biographies of living people, per , strong, multiple, reliable sources are imperitive. IMDB, IAFD and Sheridan's own web page are not eliable sources, so we're left only with AVN, and that's only good for the awards. So we're down to the awards. They're not enough to meet  even if they satisfy . This biography of a living person should be deleted or userfied, without prejudice to it's being recreated in Mainspace if it can be sourced to the standards of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:PORNBIO||WP:INHERIT||WP:BLP||WP:R||WP:GNG||WP:PORNBIO||WP:BLP)