Deletion of Majid Ali Jaunpuri

Comment: the added sources clearly establish the notability of the subject. Also legitimate concerns of not doing  by the nominator has been raised. Also a note that the nominator is a new user with the only contributions being nominating 2 AfDs, the other being rticles for deletion/Syed Mehboob Rizwi, which is also clearly a notable subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:A)

Comment: all the sources are linked to  Darul Uloom Deoband which is not a |Independent source Sources in Urdu are also not indepth or indepedent. Fails .  Adrawi's book there is mere mention in page 220 not indepth
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: the sourcing is quite poor - it's mostly links to other Wikipedia articles, and Deoband seems to be a site promoting religious faith-based essays, but doesn't appear to be something that will be a reliable source for neutral journalism. I did a  Google search and can't find other coverage under his name or for Muhaddith Manwi. Everything seems to be from Wikipedia or mirrors of the article. The sourcing fails both  and . The lack of an sourced birth date for a 20th century death is also a notability flag
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NSCHOLAR)

Comment: Significant coverage in the "History of Dārul Uloom Deoband", a reliable book by Syed Mehboob Rizwi, and Asir Adrawi's ''Karwān-e-Rafta'', and in the monthly journal of Darul Uloom Deoband. Teacher of notable scholars and considered to be notable in his field by scholars. This AfD nomination has not considered doing a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Fails  as no evidence so far of  in /. Fails  as no evidence yet of citing of the subject's works
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:TEACHER)