Deletion of Kätlin Aas

Comment: under #1. Nominator acknowledges that the subject passes an SNG, and "I haven't seen any..." is not actually a statement about the article subject, so no valid rationale for deletion has been provided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SKCRIT)

Comment: Passes  . "''I'' haven’t actually seen any independent significant coverage" isn't grounds for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL)

Comment: wow! revisiting afds that are over a week old, have just read this epic afd (over 8th words compared to around 550 in the article), as it is quite long i thought i would summarise it: 3 "deleters" (including the nominator), 7 "keepers", 2 neutral, nominator/deleters suggests Aas may be notable under  but not enough indepth/significant  coverage, keepers say Aas meets  (and some  as well) and the coverage in the article is okay to use, all in all its pretty even, i reckon this article will be kept either outright ("keepers" may just have it on the sng, and not just because there are more of them) or as no consensus because there is good reasoning on both sides (btw, if any editors think i have got it wrong please |send me a trout or two
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:RS||WP:NMODEL||WP:GNG||WP:TROUT)

Comment: Clearly passes  and  guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:GNG)