Deletion of Fraser Aird (2nd nomination)

Comment: per |G4 (or at least the ''spirit'' of G4) and '''salt'''. We shouldn't be second-guessing |consensus every time someone publishes details of |a routine contract announcement for a junior player in a non-professional league. When, or if, the subject meets either  or , take it to |Deletion Review and get permission to recreate it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:DRV)

Comment: while Rangers still is a big club, this footballer hasn't received enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources to pass the |general notability guideline, and playing for a big club confers no notability. And obviously, he fails  as he only plays at amateur level
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Meets  criteria going by sources currently used in article and other sources on Google that could be incorporated into the article. Also  trumps 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)