Deletion of Sally Morningstar

Comment: If this woman were truly a witch--an assertion I don't believe for one minute--then she would simply be able to close her eyes and twitch her nose and magically ''create'' all of the missing  that would establish her notability.  Those  simply do not exist.  Even if witches existed, and even if the necessary  existed for this particular woman, the burden would still be on the article's defenders to demonstrate that she is a '''notable''' witch among all of the witches in the world.  None of this has taken place for this article.  Yeah, Baptists exist, but an article about a run-of-the-mill Baptist minister would not only be deleted, but speedied.  So this has nothing at all to do with "religious prejudice" of any kind, and I very strongly encourage you to strike out your  against me above.  You can't just go around Wikipedia calling people bigots.  Remember: Even if witches existed and she was one, she would still have to be a '''notable''' one to merit an article--say, the president of a highly influential coven of witches.  But this is a silly argument to begin with because witches don't exist except in works of fiction
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:NPA)

Comment: None of her books is from a notable press, and self-published people don't belong on Wikipedia.  She completely fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)