Deletion of John Dolic

Comment: first, none of the additional sources are the type of in-depth coverage needed to pass , and I'm sorry but being mentioned in a doctoral thesis of a non-notable person just is not that impressive, and counts zero towards notability. In addition, almost the entire article is unsourced; sections 1, 2, and 3, as well as most of section 4 have zero sourcing. Searches turned up zero in the way of in-depth coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Coverage is of insufficient depth and/or reliability to meet . The first x to do y is not automatically notable, only when it's covered in depth by reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: At the time the AfD was created I would agree that it would not meet GNG and , however, 4 new qualifying references were added by user {{ping|Sthdifferent}} that seem to meet  they are to The Daily Telegraph / Mosman Daily. If more are added I would change my vote to keep. A quick google news search I wasn't able to find much more
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)