Deletion of Center for Minorities and People with Disabilities in Information Technology

Comment: fail of . "organizations such as these may be more critical" is not a valid rationale to establish notability. A search for CMD-IT a suggested brings up https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/03/28/945910/0/en/CMD-IT-University-Award-for-Underrepresented-Students-in-Computer-Science.html press releases that are published in various news organisations. a https://books.google.com/books?id=6yGpDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&dq=CMD-IT&source=bl&ots=YMeJEnAbkN&sig=ACfU3U22OipS3UgOojSO44GxvEr-TQ7xVg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjJ0svg8YvqAhVCCc0KHVL_DRA4FBDoATAIegQIChAB#v=onepage&q=CMD-IT&f=false few pages here is good coverage, but there doesn't seem to be any more in that vein. Even this https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310733287_Center_for_Minorities_and_People_with_Disabilities_in_Information_Technology_CMD-IT researchgate paper seems to be rather promotional based on the abstract
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: Not enough coverage is here for meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: meets  as a national organisation with several significant projects and coverage in reliable independent sources. The closer should note that some comments above were made when the article had significantly fewer sources. The best sources here include Aspray, https://cra.org/crn/2020/02/expanding-the-pipeline-the-2019-cmd-it-university-award-best-practices/ CRA and https://www.cc.gatech.edu/news/609490/school-ic-chair-ayanna-howard-named-cmd-it-2018-richard-tapia-award-winner/ GATech
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: Spinningspark gives a good overview of the current sourcing in my opinion. Unless there are more good sources out there, this organisation fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: There is one fairly decent source, three pages in Aspray's book, but that is not enough to meet  which requires multiple independent sources with significant coverage.  Several contributors either do not understand this requirement, or are not signed up to it, and their keep's are therefore not properly policy based. Jerribarrett gives a list of sources which are all either trivial mentions or publicity for giving awards. Not the in depth coverage required.  Rathfelder asserts that there are independent sources (without naming any), the sources may well be independent, but the coverage is not significant. Bilorv offers two sources besides the Asprey book.  One is just the usual awards ceremony publicity, and it is written by the orgnaisations Director of Social Media, so not independent anyway.  The second is about Ayanna Howard, an award winner, not the organisation itself which is only mentioned incidentally.  I also note that the ResearchGate paper mentioned by Eddie991 is written by Valerie Taylor, the CEO of CMD-IT so again not independent big time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)