Deletion of David Dao

Comment: as per  ''"If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: to United Express Flight 3411 - Seems like pretty clear 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to United Airlines Flight 3411 per .  I don't think that having mediocre poker success (I dispute that he placed second in the World Series of Poker in 2009, according to our World Series of Poker article the runner up was Darvin Moon, who won a little over $5 million) and being convicted of felony charges rise anywhere near the standard of notability, as evidenced by the fact that no sources have been presented from the time of those events--they have only been publicized as part of the current media frenzy.  So we are left with the single event on the United plane, which is a textbook example of BLP1E.  He is receiving media coverage only in the context of this event, he is otherwise a low profile individual (one criminal incident is not notable, and the WSOP article has numbers in the thousands of participants) and even assuming that Flight 3411 is decided to be a significant event I would argue his role is not substantial in it--the long term notability of that article is dependent on its overall effects and coverage of which he is no longer a part
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . At this time, the United Airlines Flight 3411 article suffices to tell the reader about Dao
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: to United Express Flight 3411 per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Per  (same thing as BIO1E
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per nom and . No relevant information that cannot be summarized elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: this is clearly not . Dao's drug charges and conviction ''did'' receive significant coverage at the time, so he has clearly not only notable for the United Airlines incident.http://www.wave3.com/story/4301599/elizabethtown-doctor-indicted-on-98-drug-chargeshttp://www.wave3.com/story/2071539/university-hospital-doctor-arrested-for-unlawful-prescription-writinghttps://www.newspapers.com/newspage/180696787/ https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/181256731/ Furthermore, I am in complete agreement with User:BlueSalix, that the removal of information related to his conviction has tainted or gamed this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Clearly passes  which states, "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate."  The fact that there's other coverage of this person for other reasons too means that topic also passes .  Per , there are obvious |alternatives to deletion and so a deletion discussion is quite inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:BASIC||WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Per  and . Mr. Dao has become famous for one reason: he was brutalized for refusing to get off a plane. Had this awful incident not occurred, Mr. Dao would not have a WP biography, and it strikes me as the classic example of a news story which receives saturation coverage for a few days and is forgotten shortly thereafter. As for prior news coverage of his legal troubles and poker winnings, it isn't sufficient to establish enduring notability for a biography. There's a difference between being a notable individual and merely landing in the news a few times. In particular, I don't see evidence that his past crimes are notable per , which requires "sustained coverage ... which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:CRIM)