Deletion of Celebrity Cricket League (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article demonstrates sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet the general notability guidelines. Maybe it's India's spin (bowler) version of ''Battle of the Network Stars'', maybe it's not a top-flight athletic league, but it does meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've replaced the one line stub with an earlier deleted version, which I believe had enough sources to establish |notability. In fact, this was the version I argued should be re-instated by the Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 28|deletion review. I was an active Articles for Creation reviewer at the time the article was first created and I moved it to mainspace because it was evidently a very news-worthy event. I added additional sources and copy-edited the article. The 2012 event is clearly attracting significant coverage from the Indian national media, I suspect the 2011 event did not go unnoticed either! The fact the previous deletion nomination was on the basis of the poor standard of cricket and only being notable in the second most populous nation on earth, was laughable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: nbsp; #1 and , no rationale for deletion.&nbsp; These procedural nominations enable an administrative route to disruption.&nbsp; If there is no one willing to do the work to prepare the community for a deletion discussion, then obviously there is no need for the discussion.&nbsp; By closing this WP:NPASR, then anyone that really wants this deleted can properly nominate it tomorrow.&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK||WP:IAR)