Deletion of THOMAS (neuroscience)

Comment: The article has a large number of reliable "sources", but it seems the vast majority do not refer to the theory in question. At the moment, I don't have easy access. It would be very helpful if someone who does could weed out the off-topic sources (i.e. those that do not refer to "THOMAS"). Please note: this article was created by a  (Special:Contributions/Jerojasro|Jerojasro) with major contributions by another SPA (Special:Contributions/Justin_Tsay|Justin_Tsay). Paul J. Zak was ''also'' created by yet another SPA (with the interesting name "Special:Contributions/Zakp|Zakp"). Major contributors there include two more SPAs (Special:Contributions/Iamamos|Iamamos andSpecial:Contributions/CNS2010|CNS2010). At the ''very least'', both articles will need a good bit of attention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: The ''origin'' of the article is not the reason for the deletion call here. Rather, the theory does not seem to be |notable. The variety of sources that do not discuss the theory are of no use to us in this discussion as they do not demonstrate that the theory is notable. Those sources might be useful elsewhere (outside of Wikipedia) to explain or defend the theory. That is ''not'', however, appropriate for a Wikipedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE)