Deletion of Muslim destruction of Christian history

Comment: While the underlying topic is notable (specifically the history of conflict between Christianity and Islam), the important bits are already neutrally discussed at Christianity and Islam. Given the title and the content, there is no way this article can be made |NPOV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: this article per , add the core content of it (Muslims hate Christians, Christians hate Muslims, they destroy each other's stuff, people on Wikipedia argue about it) in a less biased manner to Persecution of Christians, and create a redirect. That article already contains sufficient coverage of the "Muslim destruction of Christian history", both in historical terms and in modern context, and any gaps are filled in nicely by, as has been mentioned, Destruction of cultural heritage by ISIL and Christianity and Islam
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: The subject can have an article but I can't figure out a way to make an encyclopedic article. For now this article seems like a POV garbage (no offense). The creator should understand how  and  work, as well as  and bring serious sources and not  with news reports. This article is a blog, not a Wiki article and deleting it, apart from removing this unneeded text from Wikipedia, might change the attitude of the creator toward more productive editings
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:NPOV||WP:NOTE||WP:OR)

Comment: First, you have already voted. Second, Muslims are not trying to "Wipe away Christianity". You are confusing Islam with ISIL. Also, as Intelligentsium said, Christianity totally hasn't done that..... Crusades|totally... . Also, even if we accept your arguments, this is still biased, and does not follow . This is biased, plain and simple. Even if we kept it, we would change the title, TNT the article, and you would have no part in editing it due to bias. It's clear that you are a Christian, as you described these sites as "holy". As an atheist, I have no bias on the subject. Notifying an Admin, as this could use attention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Vote is invalid as is the first edit of the user, possible sockpuppetry/|SPA
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)