Deletion of Fuck The Earth Day

Comment: It should be noted that used apparently sent out an email blitz to self-identified inclusionists.  That is, I got one, although I don't ''ever'' remember supporting an article where mere existence can only be established via primary and/or unreliable sources.  I believe in keeping meritorious articles, but  is very important to me. Make an article about it after it becomes Festivus.  Until then '''Wikipedia is not a crystal ball'''.  Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Article is very POV (calls Earth Day "superfluous," for example) and seems to be chock-full of original research. "References" are completely non-reliable. Fails every standard of notability. |Wikipedia is not Myspace
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MYSPACE)

Comment: What part of |Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day don't you understand
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: mirroring Part Deux, |Wikipedia is not for things made up in school/college/wherever one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Fuck+the+Earth+Day%22 33 Google hits, all of which are trivial. Newly invented/|neologism holiday
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per above ( etc.). When it will be celebrated some times (say, at least ''once'') and will get some renown, one will be glad to reconsider it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)