Deletion of Antonín Koláček

Comment: I reviewed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kominas (2nd nomination)|this AfD filed by the nom yesterday, and found a blizzard of high quality, substantive sources (including the ''Boston Globe'', the ''Washington Post'', ''Rolling Stone'' magazine, the Associated Press and ''Newsweek''), demonstrating that the nom didn't make the slightest effort to source the article, as  requires he do before filing an AfD.  I checked his contribution history, and found to my shock that in the course of over '''five hundred''' edits he made over the last two days, he filed the astonishing number of '''51''' AfDs, some of them as little as three minutes apart.Many of them are as deeply flawed as this one. As is apparently the case with this nom, any sources not in English are ignored as if they are not in the articles at all, but even with machine translation (my conversational Czech is limited) it's obvious that some of these news sources -- already listed at the time of the AfD -- discuss the subject in the "significant detail" the GNG requires.  I'm also disturbed by |IDONTLIKEIT charges such as "not enclyclopedic" or flip statements such as "suspicions of something or another" which suggest that as with some other of these hasty AfDs, the nom didn't read the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)