Deletion of Doug Bresler

Comment: doesn't pass ,  or . Not enough in-depth coverage for the first, not enough quality for the second, and clearly doesn't meet the parameters of the third
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: as he seems to be a prolific contributor to the field of cartoons, with his own studios and has won a number of awards. The improved sources discuss him enough for  to be passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Per ,  and . Remember that '''information in the article itself is not relevant in this discussion''' (minus sources, etc). Most of the content in the article is '''completely unreferenced and not even supported or discussed by the sources that ''are'' listed'''. There doesn't appear to be any ''in-depth'' coverage from secondary |reliable sources that are independent of the subject, which also means that the ''significant coverage'' requirement is also out. So GNG is not met. ANYBIO is also not met, as the person has not received a "well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times". The article ''states'' that he has, but that information is completely unreferenced and I could find no reliable sources to assert that this information is true. And I also feel that NACTOR is also not met, as I see no sources that show that this person has played "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". In the end, I feel that this person is a personality and actor in non-notable media and with an overly inflated article with no references to support most of the content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NACTOR||WP:RS)