Deletion of Dana Ullman

Comment: the person could very well be a "|kook", but I can find sources such as http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=124309 ABC News, http://findarticles.com/p/search?tb=art&qt=%22Dana+Ullman%22 mentions  in Natural Health http://www.naturalhealthmag.com/health_wellness/38 magazine and Whole Earth magazine, http://www.ntskeptics.org/2002/2002june/june2002.htm a newsletter of the "North Texas Skeptics", and a mention in http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-11/alternative.html Skeptical Inquirer magazine. A search in the http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22dana+ullman%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&um=1 Google News Archive turns up http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2005/April/18/style/stories/02style.htm an article in the Santa Cruz Sentinel, http://archive.salon.com/health/feature/2000/03/16/homeopathy/print.html Salon.com, http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,983466,00.html TIME magazine, http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/09/26/LVG1U8R1CO1.DTL San Francisco Chronicle, Chicago Sun-Times 1987-05-03, Deseret News 1991-03-14, New York Times 1992-08-30, Philadelphia Inquirer 1992-11-02, Boston Globe 1993-02-26, Chicago Sun-Times 1993-07-19, Deseret News 1993-10-13, Washington Post 1995-12-05, Mothering magazine, and O magazine. I think some of those articles may cost to view online though. It looks like the article needs a heavy rewrite to make it |NPOV, but the author appears notable to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The fellow has numerous articles written about him.  And more to the point pseudoscience is a  in many Incidences, not a reason for deletion.  However, the piece does need a rewrite
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)