Deletion of Madonna as a gay icon

Comment: Easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Judy Garland as gay icon. It clearly passes  and is too long in its current state to be merged into Judy Garland without having to make significant cuts. For the other two, I'm neutral on whether to keep or merge
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the articles clearly meet . Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: all per . Clearly a  search was not done by any of the delete votes. Google books and google scholar alone provide a host of sources, not to mention what’s available in press publications. My university library search shows academic journal articles in queer and gender studies covering these topics. Frankly, the Madonna article is missing a lot of key underlying content from much earlier in her career, such as her mainstreaming of vogue from gay subculture and the impact that had on gay men. The impact of Madonna: Truth or Dare which focused on the stories of her gay backup dancers, and the way her outspoken support during the AIDS crises of the 80s and 90s all impacted the gay community and influenced her status as an icon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Madonna as a gay icon and Judy Garland as a gay icon. Clearly notable subjects in their own right that pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)