Deletion of Blackjack (cannabis)

Comment: as lacking reliable sources. I searched as far as I could and found nothing outside of the blogs and grower sites. The problem is longstanding: the laws making cannabis illegal in the United States since the 1930s have effectively prevented serious research, thus preventing development of the kind of reliable, third party sources Wikipedia generally relies on to support its articles. This is not the place to publish |original research. Come back in a few years, perhaps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per lack of |significant independent coverage outside of highly specialized sources (in this case, the lone reference is to a website which specializes in listing marijuana strains). And {{ping|SteveMcQueen36}} this article was nominated for deletion because it lacks reliable sources, and thus cannot be proven to meet |the general notability guideline by which all articles are judged. While it is understandable to be upset when an article you created is nominated for deletion, you should always |assume good faith with other editors, and make your case by citing relevant guidelines and by providing sources to back up your claims, not by making accusations or threats. If you continue to do things like that, you may be |blocked from editing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:AGF||WP:BLOCK)