Deletion of Fun Size

Comment: Maybe I'm going out on a limb here, but for anyone to say there are no sources is unfortunate, as |there are plenty available. Further, and in regards sourcing and cries of crystal being violated... the film '''has''' entered principle filming, this '''is''' being reported, and per |policy and it '''is''' appropriate to discuss the project per that extensive coverage. The brand new article was sent to AFD just 40 minutes after the last edit by its newcomer author,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fun_Size&action=historysubmit&diff=475882132&oldid=475878011 and it took only a few minutes to begin expansion and sourcing of the stub to make it a decent little start class article.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fun_Size&action=historysubmit&diff=476078237&oldid=475884214 As this film's production has been receiving coverage ever since its director was announced in January 2011, and continues to receive coverage now that it is being filmed in Cleveland, we have the topic meeting . Far better to build the article on a notable topic than it is to delete it. Had this been written last year, I would likely have opined otherwise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:FUTURE||WP:GNG)

Comment: cast and in post production, so passes  and has significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: Per  and the lack of sources. Films get articles if/when they become notable, not before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)