Deletion of Simon Leung

Comment: As well as the current sources being a train-wreck as researched by Whpq, I've had a look and can't find anything that relates to ''this'' Simon Leung, though there's stuff like http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-13/microsoft-s-leung-quits-as-head-of-china-prompting-reshuffle this which looks like it's about someone else. That admittedly makes searching for decent sources difficult. In fact, I think the ex-Microsoft Simon Leung is the one who ought to be more likely to get an article over this one. If anything, the article needs to be |taken outside and shot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: I am unable to find any significant coverage in independent |reliable sources that establish |notability.  The sourcing in the article is dreadful and appears to be an attempt at Wikipedia:Bombardment|carpet bombing the article with so many references that nobody will question it or check it.  I have reviewed the sourcing and the only thing that is close to useable is the http://technews.tmcnet.com/news/2012/11/18/6733263.htm TMC interview, but it seems more like a platform for Leung to promote himself.  There are a lot of instances where it appears that the reference has been added without actually reading the reference.  I've tagged these as vailing verification.  The most egregious example is a link to a Rugby article which mentions a player named "Simon Leung" but with no indication that this is the same person, nor does the reference appear to have anything to do with the sentence it is supposed to source.  The rest of the refernces are unreliable or primary sources.  I've tagged the referencing in the article instead of removing them so other editors can review and evaluate them for themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: per  and Whpq's meticulous research.  I tried too and couldn't find additional sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)