Deletion of The 13th Alley (2nd nomination)

Comment: the coverage identified above is sufficient for a close pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: per snow keep and |notability established per consensus at last AFD. Sorry nominator, I understand your perhaps |frustration that it was not done, but (agree with it or not) our notability guide  tells us that notability is established by sources being available,https://mountainx.com/movies/reviews/13th_alley/http://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/7489/13th-alley-the-2008/https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+13th+Alley&btnG=Searchhttps://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+13th+Alley%22&tbm=nwshttps://www.google.com/search?&q=%22The+13th+Alley%22+site:news.google.com/newspapers&source=newspapers  and not upon their ever being used. That a New York Times review is not brought forward does not make the others magically vanish. While it would be delightful if this 2008 independent film had the coverage of some major studio's highly touted blockbuster, that is not a policy nor guideline requirement. Again, sorry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:NEXIST)