Deletion of List of oxymora 2

Comment: per everyone, unsourced original research, fails  and possibly  as well as . It must go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV||WP:V)

Comment: amusing but not encyclopedic; 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Nothing more than a list of ''perceived'' oxymora, sometimes for possible comic effect or to make a point. As it stands, 'tis indeed rife with  and  violations, and additions done to tweak the noses of certain sectors of the populace (Compassionate conservative, military intelligence, Christian Science, etc) to me reek of . That being said, I do not find the article itself unencyclopedic per se, altho' in its current ''condition'' it's definitely indiscriminate. Oh, and to the user who sicced the BJBot on me to inform me of the AfD on this article I once contributed to: Thank you; most considerate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV||WP:POINT)