Deletion of Kairos society

Comment: It is obvious that there is a campaign going on, possibly from Kairos itself but possibly not, to have defenders come to Wikipedia to argue for this article to be kept. Please remember that Wikipedia is an encylopedia to share important knowledge, not a place to get the word out about a group. We have policies in place governing article inclusion, which state that an article must be shown to be |notable with ''significant coverage'' from independent |reliable sources. Surely if what you claim is true someone can do that. You cannot argue that Kairos is notable because its web site says so, and bringing in a bunch of people saying "please keep this article" isn't going to be effective, this is not a vote. Other established editors may disagree with me, and that is all well and good, hopefully there will be more who can contribute to the discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: This article has an impressive number of unreliable sources in it. Among the few reliable ones (including CNN) coverage was insignificant. A great effort to show notability that has failed. Keep in mind this is a discussion, not a vote, and you have to come up with an explanation as to why it meets  or . Having a representative from the society briefly interviewed on CNN doesn't suffice
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ORG)

Comment: Quoting , ''Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand.'' I consider student newspapers to be reliable in relation to the subject of a not-for-profit, college-age entrepreneurs. However, the coverage they provide about the subject is trivial, focussing only on an individual event (the summit). No reliable source provides significant coverage of the subject at hand. Perhaps in the future, there will be more significant coverage of this society, but there doesn't seem to be any right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)