Deletion of Tane Ikai (2nd nomination)

Comment: Notable per , just like in 2010
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. There seems to be more coverage here than usual, but nothing that justifies a stand-alone article per . Previous nominations are irrelevant (unless made in quick succession) because |consensus can change and there is no policy that states being the oldest anything is automatically notable; it comes down to sourcing, which in this case I feel is insufficient for a stand-alone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CCC)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)