Deletion of Murder of Andrew Harper

Comment: as FOARP notes, the murder of a police officer is quite rare in the United Kingdom, and it's been publicly commented on by senior government officials including the Prime Minister. It's had wide national coverage in RS, and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: onya coola, going against this afd's consensus":)) as  and does not meet , although tragic and newsworthy, due to low numbers of British police killed in line of duty (although i see that not all at List of British police officers killed in the line of duty have articles), and having been run over twice, this does not mean that an article is required. i note that a number of "keepers" above have suggested a "wait and see", interesting idea (i like mention of :)) but this appears to be contrary to CRITERIA that emphasises event endurance now ie. "have enduring historical significance", "have a significant lasting effect", "if also re-analyzed afterwards", "4.Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, ... usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance.", so  is also probably relevant. i wouldn't oppose an addition to the |hatnote at Andrew Harper directing wikireaders to List of British police officers killed in the line of duty
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:EVENT||WP:10YT||WP:EVENTCRITERIA||WP:TOOSOON||WP:HATNOTE)

Comment: I agree with {{U|FOARP}}. 1E strictly does not apply as the article is (probably) about the event, not the person. The title implies wider coverage of the aftermath, trial, impact, etc.  should be looked at. As the "event" is fairly recent, it is as of yet unclear if there will be a lasting effect or , so again I agree that this may be TOOSOON. I like to look at  as "tie breaker" and would ''suspect'' there will still be residual reporting in years to come given how rare killings of police officers are and (as of yet) lack of clarity how he actually died (i.e. by the suspect's impact or by impact with the chasing police car.) which is ''likely'' to create further coverage. pseudonym
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:10YT)

Comment: This event has attracted widespread media attention in the United Kingdom, these articles about the murder of police officers in the UK do not fail  (which is also not a sole standalone justification for deletion), especially where there has been significant attention from the media. If you go on to the UK BBC news RIGHT NOW there are several articles on the front page regarding this event. This is likely to attract media coverage for quite a while
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: I renamed the article to Killing of Andrew Harper per   as court proceeding are still in progress and it is sub judice in the UK - murder has not been proven
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)