Deletion of HHO gas (4th nomination)

Comment: Can some explain why this article has not been |speedily deleted under CSD:G4 and CSD:G11
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:SPEEDY)

Comment: Violates  and fails .  Most of the references are from one campany.  Overall this article is very POV to the point the I must take any assertion of notability with more than a grain of salt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:SCIENCE)

Comment: The fact that the |main contributor to these articles has just unilaterally decided to undo the deletion while DRV was ongoing is very troubling. We should respect the deletion and simply go to DRV if we disagree. The current actions are rather disconcerning
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN)

Comment: As i'm not a scientist I can't speak to issues about the article's content. I however would vote delete on WP procedural grounds, as three previous community consensus decisions have gone delete. The only reason this article still remains is because various authors are gaming the wiki to |disrupt it and make a point. While the merge suggestions may have some merit, all that will happen is that it will drag POV editors over to these articles and cause them to get worse. As for a rename, again this will only perpetuate the problems
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)