Deletion of Jayne Joso

Comment: per  and failing ,. This article was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jayne_Joso&oldid=292109619 created in 2009 when the subject had just released her first novel. The intent was to promote the subject. Over the years, there has been long term COI editing. More important, there is a refusal to disclose the COI. I find this particularly troubling. If we examine the notability, the subject fails GNG because there is hardly any significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. While a novel written by her has been reviewed in the TLS, reviewing alone is not a claim of notability. The links to the 3AM Magazine are (1) A short story written by her - not an independent source, (2) An interview - primary source and possibly because she has submitted stories to the same magazine and (3) A review of her book. None of this satisfies . Borderline notability combined with undisclosed COI editing is a good enough reason to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: this is no biography, and apparently no sources to create one - 'Author wrote two good books one in 2009 and one in 2011' is not a biography per uthor. A biography talks about a person's whole entire life, not two books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: this unreferenced biography of a living person, which violates policy. The version before it was trimmed back to a stub was promotional, and included many unreferenced quotations,  another policy violation. Compliance with these policies is mandatory and non-negotiable.  The editor with a conflict of interest must declare their connection openly, and comply with all our policies.  This is also required. If the article is properly referenced and the references show that she meets , then I will happily change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: the 3 short reviews now on the page scrape over the notability as per our customary interpretation of .  More persuasive was my search of old TLS articles via factiva.  There I found a feature article, a Western Mail interview entitled ''Author's Notes'' (presumably a column on writers) 1 October 2011.  Also a review of ''Perfect Architect'' in Morning Star (British newspaper), by Paul Simon, 23 August 2011
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I searched, and found nothing, nothing at all https://www.google.com/#q=%22Jayne+Joso%22 except her 88 twitter followers https://twitter.com/jaynejoso.  I even checked the Times Literary supplement mentioned above  herehttps://www.google.com/#q=%22Jayne+Joso%22+++site%3Athe-tls.co.uk.  It looks to be mere listings of books published. I am not saying that there is nothing, only that if a contemporary author is notable, something will turn up on a search.  Unless, of course, it is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: As a biography this article falls flat as Alanscottwalker points out. There just aren't the necessary sources to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)