Deletion of 7chan

Comment: fails . A look at the google search brings up blogs and other wikis, no real articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: as |original research with heavy doses of |vanity. The references that are given are |not reliable or |verifiable, elwiki, or are a joke. There is also no evidence of |notability outside of the website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:VAIN||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: 7chan deserves an article, but wikipedia has this  that is really picky about websites.  4chan has a huge traffic ranking.  While google is against 7chan.  See google-watch.org as it explains it.  Right now 7chan needs server upgrades to handle the load so it can go faster
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails  (it's not 2chan or 4chan). Also contains |unencyclopedic |original research. Potential vandal magnet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:ENC||WP:OR)

Comment: WP:OR|original research+|vanity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)