Deletion of List of fictional anarchists

Comment: mdash;satisfies  because the subject of fictional anarchists is discussed in reliable sources, e.g. http://books.google.com/books?id=TVNFul5vlK8C&pg=PA259&dq=%22fictional+anarchists%22&hl=en&ei=YJ2cTqfzEqvUiAKSluTIDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22fictional%20anarchists%22&f=false this, to give one of many possible examples, but really, if this is a non-notable grouping, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&redirs=1&ns0=1&search=intitle%3Alist+of+fictional&limit=500&offset=0 you have your work cut out for you, here.  a few personal favorites: List of fictional books and List of fictional Antichrists and List of fictional raccoons. cheers!&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: In what way does this invoke the guideline set by ? Reading the list of excluded material, 1) Summary-only descriptions of works, 2) Lyrics databases, and 3) Excessive listings of statistics, this list does not conform to them. The charge that this list's only inclusion criteria is being a fictional anarchist is not reason for deletion. It prevents vague details and indiscriminate inclusion. Being a fictional anarchist is a specific point of interest in studying anarchist fiction (which does not have its own article entry at present, but should, given examinations of it in ''Mythmakers and Lawbreakers'' and ''Film and The Anarchist Imagination''. ''Mythmakers and Lawbreakers'' includes a specific section on the topic of anarchist fictional characters. I was involved in attempting to revamp this list a few years ago when I was still a Wiki-novice, and have moved on, but as a veterin editor, I can see a lot of room for improvement to tighten up this list for readability and research aid. That's all this article needs, but AfD is not clean up. This should not have been nominated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)