Deletion of Jess Davidson

Comment: a person does not need to be named in the headline for |significant coverage, which this person has: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." For example, in the ''Time'' article, Davidson is quoted three times; similar material is in several of the other |reliable sources. There are certainly things I'd edit in the article, but AfD is not for De minimis non curat lex|fixing such trifles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: you get your name in a newspaper and you get a wikipedia article? No way. I think myself and every person i know has got their name into a 'reliable source' at some point in their lives.  stipulates that "significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail". The time magazine article isn't even about her, nor does it address her in detail. This should be a snowball delete, i dont even see how it's an edge case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: GNG)