Deletion of Legionwood: Tale of the Two Swords (2nd nomination)

Comment: Is that really enough to pass the  though? To summarize your stance, you've given 2 sources that you're not sure if they are |reliable sources, and one sources that gives it a passing mention. Is that really significant coverage? I'm still neutral on this one, I'm just trying to understand the argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Article attracks problems, article details well beyond purported reliable sources, article includes non Wikipedia reliable sources. We don't need such a problem, especially one where there is not enought reilable sources to meet .  I didn't find any reliable sources on Robert Grixti, Legionwood, or Tale of the Two Swords. (other than American LegionWood Bat Baseball League)http://bismarcktribune.com/sports/columnists/steve-thomas/article_716a9770-76a6-11df-aabf-001cc4c03286.html Where is the reliable source that supports the statement in the article, "This early release of the game was included on a cover disc with the December 2008 issue of Australian magazine PC Powerplay"? If no reliable source writes about such a fact, then that fact doesn't belong in a Wikipedia article, even if original research shows it true, and it certainly doesn't go towards meeting . The things said in an interview by those connected to the topic is not independent of the topic and doesn't count towards meeting GNG either. What the interview says may count towards GNG, but that's not enough for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)