Deletion of Wie Wahrnehmung sich erfindet (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  #5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: as the nomination does not request deletion.  As for the topic, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=j8UoVW25g_kC&pg=PA154 this source, explains that it was a series of lectures which were subsequently published.  Per , nominators should establish the nature of the topic before starting another page just so that other editors are made to explain the matter to them.  As James500 explained, the fact that the author is a Nobel-winner, is enough.  |AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: to Herta Müller. "Wie Wahrnehmung sich erfindet" is the subtitle of ''Der Teufel sitzt im Spiegel'', which makes it a little unclear that it's a separate book at all. All the top Google hits for this in quotes are about ''Der Teufel''. German Wikipedia doesn't have an article for either book and :de:Herta Müller|their article about the author, which is more detailed than our own, doesn't mention ''Wie Wahrnehmung sich erfindet'' except as a subtitle. If it is a standalone book then, despite  #5, a standalone article isn't the best way to organise the information, in my view, unless and until we have more to say about it than this stub. I wasn't able to find sources with which to do that
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Satisfies criteria 5 of the guideline . The author won a nobel prize for literature. You can't use an essay to reject a guideline, especially when the essay is garbage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)