Deletion of Rose Jackson (2nd nomination)

Comment: as bad-faith nomination. This is the second article I've edited recently that appears to have been AfDd by this guy today as  retaliation for having voted to delete Stephen Battaglia and Zazz, both of which were authored by the nominator. As to Jackson's notability, she is the current president of a major national union, something which is clearly evident in the article. The "tags" referred to were bogus verifiability tags that kept being re-added despite requests to explain what, if anything, was actually disputed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: per , and '''speedy''' per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4|G4. Being student politician certainly isn't notable, and president of the NUS would only very slightly increase her notability. I reckon she would still have to cross the hurdle of party nomination for a safe parliamentary seat to become notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: Before reading the latest comments I was about to vote Delete based on  - however after reading JzG's comment re it's Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G4|G4 qualification (I lack the ability to view the content of deleted pages) I see no alternative
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: seems inconsistent  wiki is not a crystal ball. She may go on to do other/greater things, but that doesn't mean her entry deserves to be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)