Deletion of Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism

Comment: the sections in the two articles from where this material came each seemed like they were 'daugher articles' of a 'parent article' that was missing. Here now is the parent article - a |sourced article that considering the number of sources is much more |notable than many other articles in Wikipedia that have survived AfD. I am not seeing anything from the group siding for POV fork deletion that this is actually a POV fork of anything. (except perhaps for Merzbow's "When a POV is so extreme a minority, there are likely to be few published opposing POVs since it mostly isn't even worth responding to. In such a case the "opposing POVs" are simply the majority opinions of what the thing is, and NPOV is violated by forking the extreme minority POV to its own article " but I am not sure that is even accurate or standard application in WP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Deleting this will simply result in forking the material back out to two separate articles, each of which are long enough in their own right. Especially in Allegations of state terrorism by the United States arguments over this material is creating an endless edit war which is tying up the rest of the article for weeks at a time.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=214455836&oldid=214069077 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=214496849&oldid=214455836 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=214508453&oldid=214496972 Otherwise, though a new article, it's |sourced and is a |notable part of the debate over the bombings in their own right, as well as a notable allegation of state terrorism by the U.S. I know others don't want to just say , but oh well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I am leaning towards weak keep, which suprises me, because as I read the article I was thinking, "delete, delete". But the arguments presented here in favor of keeping are somewhat persuasive. I think that if the material is merged back into the "State terrorism" article, it implies that the atomic bombing of Japan was in fact state terrorism. The current article at least makes reference to the fact that its generally not an accepted view. The POV fork certainly needs work, and the "Opposing views" should probably be up A LOT higher expressing that "Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism" = , yet I don't see that any of the delete arguments here have presented a strong enough case to move it back into the main state terrorism article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)