Deletion of Andrew Gower (4th nomination)

Comment: Plenty of interviews and the like to establish notability, which is clear from the current consensus. While the page not having citations is an issue, |poor quality is not grounds for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: sources suggest notability, plus there may be other available sourcing, which I will dig into a bit later. I believe that his company won an industry award recently, which helps build up notability. If we assume that "Creative Professionals" include founders/designers of games companies, than this award would give him notability under point 3 of . The fact that there is no biographical information should not be a reason for deletion: Better to provide the reader with the information that exists in a stub, rather than have no information at all. Whilst I can see why this is on the borderline of "Keep" and "Delete" according to guidelines, I think that  should be invoked here. The mission statement is to provide the end-user, the reader of Wikipedia, with reliable sourced information on notable topics. It is entirely possible that following the industry award Jagex Ltd recieved, some may be interested in the founder of the firm. We should not deny them the reliable sourced information currently available. I am by no means saying all the content of the article is perfect, but I believe it would be a net positive to the project goals to maintain and improve this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:IAR)