Deletion of List of countries by Internet connection speed

Comment: There are two issues here: (a) whether there are problems with the current content of the article and what needs to happen to improve it, and (b) whether "list of countries by internet connection speed" meets the various requirements for a page to exist on Wikipedia (notability and whatnot). Generally speaking, for the purposes of a deletion discussion the primary way these two questions have a direct bearing on each other is if the content of the page is so egregiously bad that it would have to be completely rewritten in order to comply with encyclopedic standards (as frequently is the case with overly promotional articles and such). There are huge problems with the page, but none that would require scrapping and starting over. So, focusing on (b), I would say it easily passes  and . There are a number of such lists out there that have been covered by every major news publication in the last few years.  is about overrunning encyclopedia articles with statistics and isn't applicable when the encyclopedic subject is a meaningful kind of measurement. Otherwise we'd have to get rid of List of countries by population, List of countries by number of Internet users, and hundreds of others. So keep, but the article as it is needs some serious TLC. --&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SALAT||WP:NOTSTATSBOOK)

Comment: List of countries by Internet connection speed (I'm not considering the other lists, as they are dissimilar enough that they should be individually considered). I don't agree with either of the nominator's suggested reasons.  would seem to hinge in this case on issue #3 "excessive listings of statistics"; while entirely subjective, my subjective opinion is that the listings are not excessive. It's a short list of just 63 countries, listing only the average connection speed for each country. The "not enough information for it to be a standalone article" again is a subjective issue with which I disagree, but I wonder if perhaps the nominator was considering Wikipedia guidance for non-list articles; there is a separate page of guidelines on stand-alone lists at , with broad guidance on appropriate topics described at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK||WP:STANDALONE||WP:SALAT)