Deletion of Jim Falk

Comment: but the last book was published 16 years ago. and look at the publications tab of http://www.findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/researcher/person35647.html it counts papers from 2001, I don't know when he started at Uni of Melbourne but it appears he's only produced 6 papers. If you are trying to use academic publications criterion of , I don't think he satisfies it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Significant research record, including a highly cited (221 hits per GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Jim+Falk%22&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search) book. GoogleBooks gives 347 hitshttp://books.google.com/books?q=%22Jim+Falk%22&btnG=Search+Books. The director of a research center at a significant university (Melbourne). Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: number of consultancies is not an indication of notability as an academic, most academics especially in science, technology and engineering provide expert advice to government agencies and private sector.  If you quote http://www.findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/researcher/person35647.html then every academic at Melbourne uni I can find on this should have a Wikipedia article.can  we have some more independent sources to establish his |notability besides www.unimelb.edu.au ? I don't see how I'm being hypocritical but I do note he has similar views to what you're into.but please be objective here, yes he does have expertise but the question is he notable enough to have a Wikipedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)