Deletion of MARAIS

Comment: Generally speaking, the key to meeting en.wikipedia's notability rules is whether the subject has been ''substantially'' discussed by ''independent'' sources. Anything written by Marais is of little use. Similarly, a passing mention in an article about somebody else using a Marais product proves nothing. What you need is more stuff like http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/automated-trenching-innovation-seen-as-aligned-to-big-fibre-push-2007-07-27 this and http://www.francebtp.com/carrieres/article/2011/01/26/54035/la-location-tire-activite-marais.php this and http://www.inpi.fr/fileadmin/mediatheque/pdf/DP_trophees_PaysdelaLoire.pdf?PHPSESSID=743bc971ad7dcf22a81114c228064e91 this - I think that there are enough sources like that to show Marais is notable, but only just. As far as I can tell, articles like http://www.bursahakimiyet.com.tr/haberDetay.aspx?hid=22962 this and http://guataca.es/obras-en-el-anillo-de-telecomunicaciones-de-tenerife/ this aren't really about Marais, per se - they might be useful to |verify individual statements in an article but not to establish |notability. Similarly, http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/113443/Marais-Lucas_Technology.pdf this might be hosted on an Australian government website, but it seems to have been written by Marais
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: The problem with the article is that it isn't notable enough under . The company doesn't seem to have been written about in any significant way by sources that could be considered reliable, or fully independent of the company. The references given in the article are given for the parts of the article that couldn't be considered controversial and most of these are self-published. I suspect that due to the apparent lack of notability it would be difficult to bring the article up to a standard that makes it useful. If the company becomes notable then there would be no problem with recreating the article at that point, but at this time there isn't significant depth of coverage to warrant an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)