Deletion of Sigtuna Cricket Club

Comment: There's not enough reliable coverage in secondary sources to cover notability.  It's similar to Irish club teams which led to  being amended, with many being found to be non-notable (little independent coverage, didn't play in the respective Irish cricket unions top division ect).  There's plenty of cricket clubs in Ireland, while this club may play in a top national division, that isn't a particularly notable feat in a country where according to an article only 16 cricket clubs exist.  Club sides have always required significant coverage, unfortunately this one falls well short.  A full breakdown of the debate regarding the notability of Irish cricket clubs and the decisions reached about notability can be found Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cricket/Archive_71#North_West_Senior_League_2|here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: Fails  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CLUB)

Comment: Because of a lack of argument above, I fail to see how the  notability guidelines have been applied here to arrive at non-notability. There are only specified criteria for Great Britian and Australia, plus a statement "It is necessary to take an individual view about each country in terms of its own grassroots structure". How has that been done in this case? Since Sigtuna CC as far as I can tell plays in the highest Swedish division, does that mean that the nominator interprets  to mean that no Swedish cricket teams can be notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)