Deletion of Balch & Bingham

Comment: This does pass  with independent sources that demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: It’s a 100 year old law firm this falls in line with . It is difficult to find an depth profile since it has been through mergers and acquisitions and those related stories should count too, but here are some I found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MULTSOURCES)

Comment: Does not pass , events are routine for a law firm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic article. I do not believe the sourcing is strong enough to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)