Deletion of Trump orb (2nd nomination)

Comment: I agree that violates and is .  —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I totally support delete, but why Salt? On the off chance this meme ends up passing the Wikipedia:10 year test (it almost certainly won't given that based on the sources, it doesn't seem to have passed a one month test, but who knows, I'm not psychic) I don't see why we should stop re-creation of this article. If people recreate it identically or otherwise try to circumvent this discussion that's what |Db-repost (Speedy Deletion Criteria 4) is for. Has this page been deleted and disruptively re-created in the past
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G4)

Comment: While it is true that the subject got extensive coverage at the time, not everything that the media focus on is worthy of a dedicated article on an encyclopedia. All those sources are solely centered on a news spike that only lasted for a week.  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Why does this article exist? This is pure 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: the proposer's rationale sums it up. Should we add "Not Know Your Meme" to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per otnews; passing trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Not meme" is not policy and it's not true as Wikipedia contains articles about :Category:Internet_memes|hundreds of memes from All your base are belong to us to Zinedine Zidane.  We even have a substantial category of :Category:Political Internet memes|political memes.  So, instead, our actual policy is that |Wikipedia is not censored which means that we don't delete stuff just because some busybody doesn't like it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSOR)

Comment: WP:RECENTISM was responsible for making this brief media story appear more significant than it truly was. No  impact resulted from this and let us try to remember |wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Make Wikipedia Great Again by deleting this article and enforcing . Believe me, it will be amazing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOT)

Comment: OK, so I'm not sold on the inelegant title "Trump orb" (it wasn't even his orb!). But this rises to a level beyond just a "meme"—and incidentally, the main difference between notable political moments like this, and ones in the past, is that we just didn't use the word "meme" yet. (Was Clinton's reference to Sister Souljah a Sister Souljah moment|"meme"? What about Bush shoeing incident|this? Point is, plenty of peripheral political minutia is "notable" in context.) Trump touching the orb was notable in many people's minds because it marked a very visual turn from Trump's declared "anti-globalist" policies on his campaign to the realities of his governance. Wikipedia has to balance policies like  and perceived "RECENTist" tendencies with the RECENTist reality of culture outside Wikipedia itself. People are interested in encyclopedic assessment of moments like this—a place where a range of commentary and sources are assembled and balanced in line with other Wikipedia policies. Further, it's the kind of thing that people will continue to look up over time. Naturally, https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=all-time&pages=Trump_orb interest spiked months ago, but that's the long tail in action—and the end of the long tail has value, too. At the very least, a summary section on this should be merged into 2017 Riyadh summit, maybe a mention on Donald Trump on social media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: Fails . No lasting coverage. See  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Anything involving Trump is going to generate intense coverage, we need more than that to demonstrate that this goes beyond . We'll have articles on the number of ice cream scoops he receives if we don't show some restraint. Portions of this may be useful at 2017 Riyadh summit though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)