Deletion of Bose Headphone Family

Comment: Thanks for seeing that this is not an ad :) But this is not a copyvo and we have done a lot to make the article as |NPOV as possable to make sure that its af fair as it can be! Please help us fix it not destroy a lot of very hard work researching and incoperating material
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The comment was not a Red Herring but was used to point out that ''any'' product article can be called an ad. The PS3 is a great example since it talks about the specs and the prices like the Bose Headphones do, but in addition to this it also talks about the products in particular using as much info as possable. The Bose Headphone article does cite other sources than the manufacture itself. But if you want us to list all facts from Non Bose sources thats easy enough to do! Here is a quick list of places that cite info on them http://www.cnet.com.au/hometheatre/accessories/0,39028666,40002300,00.htm http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1989406,00.asp http://shop.pcmag.com/shop/product/pcmag/21352305.aspx http://reviews.cnet.com/Bose_TriPort_Headphones_Glacier_Blue/4505-6468_7-21174534.html But even so puting us hard substantial facts about a product is not advertising. If you see advertising please help us make this article more |NPOV Dont remove all the hard work done, please help us make this article great
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: and userfy if someone requests it. Blatant |brochurespeak
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wow thanks for all the links :) I think that your right this would show that  has been satisfied :) Since so many published reports by independent consumer watchdog organizations has been provided why is there any debate here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The sources themselves are only one problem. The inclusion of detailed specifications and descriptions for many individual models of Bose products is extremely dubious, with or without a reliable source. |Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. Without something to indicate that these individual models are all so notable as to warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia, it doesn't particularly matter if the source of the specifications is Bose, Best Buy, or the Vulcan Science Academy. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Articles about consumer products cannot be considered unencyclopaedic just because of their subject matter. This article should definitely stay. Such articles are an excellent resource for the consumer because they are purely factual rather than being biased marketing literature or an opinion-based review. It is clear a lot of work has gone into this article and the article in its present state seems very factual and an asset to Wikipedia. However, I do believe that the some of the pricing and warranty information should be removed, as despite being factual, it makes the article look a little like a product catalogue. The units of measurement should also be primarily metric, as that is the system used in most of the world. The section about good customer relations should possibly be removed or edited, as it does not reflect 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Thanks for seeing that this is not an ad :) But this is not a copyvo and we have done a lot to make the article as |NPOV as possable to make sure that its af fair as it can be! Please help us fix it not destroy a lot of very hard work researching and incoperating material
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Can you try to be |NPOV about this? It doesn't look like your looking at the articles about what they are, you seam to see that its by Bose and thats all that matters
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)