Deletion of Gyp-Crete

Comment: Either as an industry term or a  trademarked product, the lack of |reliable sources is evident
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This AfD was malformed and never properly listed. Even though the nomination is withdrawn and the AfD technically closable per , I feel that a few days of proper discussion before closing may be beneficial, hence the relist. Please consider this the first week of discussion for relisting purposes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)

Comment: per the lack of |reliable sources. While the editors above have determined that they can purge the article of promotion, they have been unable to prove its |notability. I have done http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Gyp-crete%22+Maxxon&btnG=Search&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a several http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Gyp-crete%22+concrete&btnG=Search&um=1&scoring=a searches for sources but have been unable to uncover anything to establish this product's notability. The company that created this product, Maxxon Corporation, does not have a Wikipedia article; the company does not appear to be notable: the articles on http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&q=%22Maxxon%22&cf=all Google News Archive are either press releases or passing mentions. Thus, a merge cannot be performed, so this article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)