Deletion of Witness accounts of the Roswell UFO incident (2nd nomination)

Comment: This isn't an encyclopedia article.  It's a repository of people making unanswered claims.  An encyclopedia article would be "Roswell UFO incident" with a section on claims, or perhaps a citation saying "there are X many claims".  Not this.  This is just an assault of primary sources (in typical conspiracy theory fashion).  Also, where are |the lists of people who didn't see anything?  I could be compelled to say keep if someone made a convincing argument that this article could and would be turned into a NPOV, concise and verifiable summary of the reports and discussion of their importance to the mythology as a whole.  We don't need another page pretending the LGM are real
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: this unencyclopedic quotefarm per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)