Deletion of Prince Gabriel, Duke of Dalarna

Comment: WP:LOWPROFILE child for whom privacy is a serious concern, where the illusion of otability is purely due to familial ties (but notability is OTINHERITED). See : {{tq|That person ''A'' has a relationship with well-known person ''B'', such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on ''A'' (unless significant coverage can be found on ''A''); wikipedia:NOTINHERITED|relationships do not confer notability. However, person ''A'' may be included in the related article on ''B''. For example, Jason Allen Alexander is included in the article on Britney Spears and the page Jason Allen Alexander merely wikipedia:R|redirects to that article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:INVALIDBIO)

Comment: Brushing off the illegitimate  and "All royals are notable!" arguments -- no one's arguing for the notability of cute blond royal toddlers are out there battling for the notability of tribal monarchs in Nigeria, say. Those claiming a GNG keep plainly misunderstand the GNG, which is ''not'' a hundred namedrops in however-reliable sources, but actual |''significant coverage'', to the ''subject'', in reliable sources.  This obviously has not been forthcoming, and to any voter who might respond "Well, how much can you say about a toddler?" I answer, "You're right.  You can't.  Which is why the subject does not qualify for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSUSEFUL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The nom covered this very well. The topic fails  and . There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable  . Being in some distant spot in line for a throne that they will never occupy is not even remotely notable. Its a stretch beyond reason to even think this is a  and arguements about "what might happen in the future" are . Wikipedia is  of non-notable children in royal families. ''"AfDs are a place for rational discussion of whether an article '''is able to meet Wikipedia's article guidelines and policies'''."'' . The arguments in favor of keeping this article are all based on feelings and personal opinions. The nominator has clearly shown how this article does not meet article guidelines and policies. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:INVALIDBIO||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP1E||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NOTGENEALOGY||WP:AFDFORMAT)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a directory of princelings or anything else. Notability is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: to his father, Prince Carl Philip, Duke of Värmland. There is not enough to say about this person yet to warrant having a separate article. If, later in life, he does things that bring him more |significant coverage, even if just for being a socialite, the article can be re-created at that time
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)