Deletion of Imperial Guard (comics) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Article and references have been ''vastly improved'' from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imperial_Guard_(comics)&oldid=935238093 what it was.  .  Meets .  ot paper.  reserve
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:GNG||WP:N||WP:P)

Comment: The nomination is based on  but that is an |essay and "''Essays have no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community''".  What's wanted is policy and most applicable is  which states "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page.''"  The page is already quite good but improvement is still feasible as I have just done so
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFICTION||WP:ESSAY||WP:ATD)

Comment: Despite all the people showing up and |casting their votes, none have thus far managed to add any substantial real-world information to this  article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDEMOCRACY||WP:ALLPLOT)

Comment: As was the case less than a year ago when it was deleted at AFD before, there just are not enough non-plot summaries in reliable, third party sources to pass the .  I'd almost venture to say this current iteration of the article is even ''worse'' than the one that was deleted already, as it appears to be even ''more'' filled with in-universe plot summaries than the old article.  As mentioned multiple times in the previous AFD, this group is already covered in the main Shi'ar article, which is the broader topic, and is not independently notable enough that it would require a split from that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I read through the linked secondary sources and am not seeing which ones are meant to constitute |significant coverage. I'm seeing no substance with which we can build a dedicated encyclopedia article. The article is longer than it was when it was deleted in January, yes, but is length is empty if it's built from every extant passing mention of the topic and |bolstered by primary sources. For those who simply want to preserve the content, Shi'ar would make a good redirect target in which the little that is actually sourced can be appropriately covered, but as was said above, that article too lacks in-depth secondary source coverage. I'd be interested in other potential redirect targets but every other instance I've seen would bring no reader benefit—all brief mentions in a long list. (Maybe {{section link|List of alien races in Marvel Comics|Shi'ar}}?) Hence deletion, per the last AfD. (not Help:Watchlist|watching, please {{tl|ping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: based on significant improvements to the article to meet the , or failing that '''merge''' to Shi'ar per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Per TTN, fails , sources are  mentions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TRIVIAL)

Comment: per ; the article is better than it was in the previous nomination. Complaining that a perfectly adequate published RS is an "interview" shows that the nom/delete voters really just want another notch on their belt. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: doesn't come close to passing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)