Deletion of Ridesharing.com

Comment: the sources listed by Osoyoos are not convincing for notability. Forbes, for example, is from forbes.com/sites which is a user submitted area and does not count towards notability: https://www.forbes.com/sites/gingerdean/2017/01/30/4-ways-to-increase-your-income-this-month-and-every-month-this-year/#862481f71d49 4 Ways to Increase Your Income This Month. The other links provides news clips on the company's web site, and they are the usual suspects -- interviews and other  sources. So '''unchanged''' for me: still "Delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)

Comment: Every website that exists does not get an automatic inclusion freebie — it has to be the ''subject'' of |reliable source coverage in ''media'' to qualify for an article, and does not get to keep an article that's metareferenced exclusively to its own |self-published content on itself. And as for the claim that an article is mandatory because one exists on FR, that's not a notability claim either — FR is just as |user-generated as we are, so the fact that an article ''exists'' on FR doesn't necessarily mean it ''belongs'' there.  still applies to content on other language Wikipedias, and not just internally to EN alone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SELFPUB||WP:USERG||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: 100% promo article on a private company with no indication of notability or significance. Such content is excluded per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM)