Deletion of Sigma 30mm f/2.8 DN Art

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a catalog of every product which is offered for sale.   Most lenses and cameras which have been offered for sale in the last hundred years or so have had some reviews in photo magazines. Coincidentally, those same magazines which reviewed camera products  sold pages of advertising to the companies whose products they reviewed. Today these pricey gadgets all get a bit of coverage at sites which get revenue from sellers when readers click on the link as well as sites which may or may not qualify as "reliable sources" since any person can create such a review site.  Therefore I discount their being "independent and reliable coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: There are at least four independent reviews easily found online, including PCMag so this passes  in contradiction to nomination. Lenses made by major manufactures are not run-of-the-mill but are written about individually
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)