Deletion of Kamen Rider Ryuki Special: 13 Riders

Comment: Just merely saying "stuff existed", with the ''acknowledgement'' that there will be no secondary source coverage of it, merely serves to point out the article's failure of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Not being able to myself read Japanese, I'll wait until a Japanese-reading Wikipedia interested in digging through and translating sources speaks up... or better, a Japanese Wikipedian who has access to hardcopy sources in Japan libraries and archive... as reliable sources might well be found among the results above, or among sources not available online. And what is a bit more worrisome is this growing fixation that a brand new article created in good faith by an author who is aware or requirements and wishes to bring it into line, must be immediately perfect... as such immediatism seems to run contrary to , , and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:WIP||WP:DEADLINE)