Deletion of Spredfast (2nd nomination)

Comment: as spam on an unremarkable subject. Content is strictly advertorial so  applies. No indications of notability or significance. For example, Fortune coverage is insufficient to meet  as it discusses company funding and aspirations, strongly suggesting that it's  for this subject to have an encyclopedia entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Fails . One article. Nothing else. Google turns up their Twitter, their LinkedIn, their facebook. Nothing's changed since the last deletion. Also, , , . Wikipedia is not a free advertising site
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:COI||WP:GNG||WP:WWIN)