Deletion of Michael Rassias

Comment: Doesn't rise to the standard of . Having published stuff, even if it was in collaboration with famous people, isn't enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON|too soon to have established independent notability for his mathematical contributions. The article tries to make a case for |inherited notability by working with famous people but we don't use that sort of reasoning here. And publishing stuff is also not a claim of notability; what #C1 asks for is that the stuff you publish have an established impact. Also, note that https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Bfdy0JYAAAAJ his Google Scholar profile is misleading — what it shows as his top-cited paper is actually "The Problem of S. M. Ulam for Approximately Multiplicative Mappings", https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022247X0096788X a publication from 2000 (long before he was active as a professional mathematician) by someone else with a similar name, Themistocles M. Rassias
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED||WP:PROF)