Deletion of List of films that pass the Bechdel test

Comment: As has been noted by several editors above, this is way too broad per  (anything even approaching exhaustive would be terribly ), and the issues that have been raised about sourcing/ are also pretty serious. Put simply, this topic does not lend itself to a list article. There's nothing to merge, and there's no point in turning it into a  because the scope problem is so fundamental as to be unfixable. What we ''could'' do is take a handful of examples that are discussed/examined in-depth by  sources and add some prose about those in-depth discussions/examinations to the main Bechdel test article (compare the outcome of rticles for deletion/Eco-terrorism in fiction
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR||WP:DRAFT||WP:RELIABLE||WP:A)

Comment: as  until we can come up with a compliant, non-OR way and non-all encompassing to possibly do. Which I'm unfortunately not sure exists unless an "official Bechdel test metric" can suddenly emerge. Obviously the test itself is very notable, but as others have mentioned the requirements are vague enough for this to be as tough as creating a list of "films where there is adequate gender representation" -- something based mostly on OR and editor opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: as  per nom; it's baked into the title and isn't fixable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: As the creator of this list, I am aware that the Bechdel test has its limitations with regard to reflecting whether a film is feminist and/or gender-equal (which I cite in the description). But regarding the possible difficulties in determining whether the criteria are met (e. g. what counts as a conversation), these seem to be no greater than the difficulty of determining, say, the genre of a film. Most lists of films by genre (e. g. List of drama films of the 1990s) on Wikipedia do not seem to contain reliable sources for a film's genre, and yet do not raise  concerns. Whether or not a genre is very well defined, it usually does not take a film expert to state whether a given film belongs to a certain genre. It is a somewhat (though not entirely) subjective property of a film that most people would be able to determine for themselves when watching it. Genres are useful for describing films and are commonly used on Wikipedia, even without reliable sources. I would argue that the Bechdel test criteria are similar, and perhaps even better defined than the criteria for, say, a drama film. The "named character" and "minimum of 60 seconds" criteria are based on sources I cite in the article, not my own inventions. I chose to use these criteria for the reasons I cite in the article, but also because (as stated above) the list might otherwise become much too long. However, I admit that including non-male characters was my own idea and I would be ok with removing this for the sake of saving the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per nom and a big  fail as too indiscriminate. As ''MrsSnoozyTurtle'' has noted, this list would have to include about half of all films
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: The only actual sourced content is to explain the Bechdel test itself - the actual list of films is complete .  I would be fine if someone would like to have it reverted back to draft to try to salvage it, but the original research should not remain in the main article space in the meantime
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)