Deletion of Objectivist theory of value

Comment: Verifiable' and 'reliable' sources exist for the content of this article.  The sources in use, according to the example given in  for 'Significant Coverage', are significant.  As far as the sourced content is concerned, there is no way it is original research.  However, despite not being original-research, its content should be merged with sections in other articles such as Hume and Objectivism.  Although the theory is essential to Objectivism, I don't think it is essential to wikipedia as a separate article.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)

Comment: The article has been improved.  As it is notable according to  it likely should have been tagged for requiring citations instead of being nominated for deletion in the first place.  The rationale for having the article deleted is more blunt on the article's talk page: x number of hits in a google search means afd.  I suggest reading the  page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:ATA)

Comment: The poor quality of the article, and the likelihood that it violates , are good reasons for deleting.  However, there seems to be a very widespread misconception among WikiProject Philosophy members that Rand is not notable ''as a philosopher''.  I find this to be patently false.  Her theories are regularly discussed by people who dislike them, and Rand has been included in several anthologies of ethics and political philosophy (some of which I've cited before in these debates).  Like most, I disagree with her.  But I certainly don't take that as a sufficient reason to censor knowledge about her.  I mean, I don't get to go around deleting articles about Kant, right
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: and merge useful content elsewhere. The phrase is mention in http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=133467 this abstract. I've seen it used only one other time, in Environmental Ethics in the context of "an objectivist theory of value in nature." The topic does not meet . The article seems more about ''The philosophic thoughts of Ayn Rand on objectivist theory of value.'' With Rand predominating the topic, the topic still does not meet  since the |source material is not indpenendent of rand. Also, we already have enough articles and other material on Ayn Rand: Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand Institute, Bibliography_of_work_on_Objectivism#Works_by_Ayn_Rand|Bibliography of work on Objectivism - Works by Ayn Rand, Objectivism (Ayn Rand), Objectivism, Ayn Rand, and homosexuality, Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, Randian hero, Randism, The Ayn Rand Collective, The Ayn Rand Column, The Ayn Rand Letter, The Ayn Rand Lexicon, The Early Ayn Rand, The Passion of Ayn Rand, :Category:Ayn Rand characters, :Category:Books by Ayn Rand, and :Template:AynRand
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:RS)