Deletion of Brett Kimberlin

Comment: subject clearly has received ''significant coverage'' required by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject is obviously notable and the current article is not an attack page.  (BLPs with notability subject to  are bound to contain some negative information.  That's just how it is.)  None of the other reasons given are valid criteria for deletion - indeed, parts of the nomination point to things that could be seen as bolstering the subject's notability.  Editors should be mindful that the nomination is from an account that was clearly created for the express purpose of deleting the article.  See
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: but reluctantly. I hear "please don't throw me into the briar patch." I dislike giving the subject publicity but unquestionable |notoriety. The article is not an attack page but does need work to get to ''just the facts'' supported by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)