Deletion of Bristol/Bath to South Coast Study

Comment: A search targeting just one local newspaper turns up a number of references to this study. {{Find sources|site:thisisbath.co.uk bristol south coast study}} (Some hits are just reader comments, but the others count as 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: to Bristol and Bath articles. Evidence of a significant amount of coverage in independent, reliable sources is lacking, and I haven't been able to find any additional sources that would counter this impression. Government reports and government commentary on government studies do not constitute independent coverage, in my view. Outside of government circles, there's only a smattering of coverage, mostly residents voicing their opinions on planning and policy. This, too, does not rise to the level of significant coverage in my view. I tend to agree with Martinvl. The most practical course would be to merge selectively into the Bristol and Bath articles, taking care that the merge does not give undue weight to the report. A sentence or two or three may be warranted, depending on the context. As a separate article, though, we are not yet at . I don't think it's necessary to invoke  here because this material has a suitable home elsewhere, and need not be wholly removed from the encyclopedia under the guidelines
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IAR)

Comment: article creator) per , .http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo030108/halltext/30108h02.htm pre-report Hansard refhttp://www.uwe.ac.uk/aqm/centre/transboundary.pdf UWE Air Quality Research Grouphttp://democracy.bathnes.gov.uk/celistdocuments.aspx?MID=1775&DF=26%2F07%2F2004&A=1&R=0&F=embed$JSPTU%20statement1.htm Statement to Planning, Transportation, & Sustainability Overview & Scrutiny Panel(by Frank Cashmore of the http://web.archive.org/web/20041013185721/http://www.jsptu-avon.gov.uk/index.htm Joint Strategic Planning and Transportation Unit, now apparently superseded by the West of England Partnership)http://www.swcouncils.gov.uk/media/SWRA/Assembly%20Papers/30th%20April%202004/PaperB.pdf SWRA reporthttp://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/media/20d96c7a5aa57fb3cf00cd3a51c278281bc4f3d2/gw_timetable_briefing.pdf Passenger Focus Dec 2006 briefing dochttp://www.brlsi.org/events-proceedings/proceedings/24907 Bath Literary and Scientific Institution event(could be seen as PR, but still noted by the Institution)http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/ltp-2-chapter-1-intro.pdf Wiltshire LTP 2006/07http://www.thisisbath.co.uk/question-transport-8211-readers-say-city-s-plans/story-11357368-detail/story.html summary of residents' views on Bath's transporthttp://www.thisisbath.co.uk/Protest-park-ride/story-11321945-detail/story.html article with reference to the Batheaston P&Rhttp://www.thisisbath.co.uk/Wiltshire-hits-lorry-row/story-11353169-detail/story.html proposed HGV restrictionshttp://www.thisisbath.co.uk/thought-needed-lorries/story-11321543-detail/story.html CBT commenthttp://www.thisisbath.co.uk/Councils-work-HGV-problem/story-16428220-detail/story.html FOBRA commenthttp://swwiltshirelibdems.org.uk/en/article/2012/478569/bath-s-lorries-are-coming-our-way swwiltshirelibdemshttp://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmswest/146/146ii.pdf HoC Transport in the South West 2010 report
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)