Deletion of David Radius Hudson

Comment: As a complete aside, do we |really, really need http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Radius_Hudson&oldid=533603136 ''18'' references to cite one sentence
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBLOAT)

Comment: Good idea. I have created the page over at Monoatomic gold. With the additional newspaper sources, I still consider Radius Hudson's notability passes  and oppose a merge
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Even if the cited books could be seen as reliable sources – which they almost certainly can't (one of them's a novel, for Christ's sake) – they would only establish the notability of Hudson's discovery, ORMUS. None of them focus on Hudson himself, and therefore don't amount to significant coverage (: "''Significant coverage'' means that sources address the subject directly in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)