Deletion of Eva Carneiro

Comment: There appear to be two things being confused here. Coverage can verify that a subject meets one or more of our accepted notability criteria by demonstrating awards, achievements, etc.. The GNG also states that the fact that a subject has received significant coverage means that they are (generally) considered notable - that coverage doesn't need to also tell us that the subject is notable via some additional criteria. The argument that the coverage doesn't demonstrate notability beyond the fact that the coverage exists is therefore fallacious. While much of the coverage is of the 'sexy Chelsea physio' variety, more than one example goes into considerably more depth including details of her career prior to Chelsea (there is much more coverage around than those examples listed above). Plenty of people are notable solely because of their looks and receive coverage because of that, the difference here perhaps is that this is not Carneiro's career choice. Whether or not consensus is that there should be an article here, arguments that coverage has been received because she works for Chelsea and should therefore be discounted on the basis of  simply don't hold water
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)