Deletion of Dave Armstrong (Catholic apologist)

Comment: the article doesn't have any sources at all. Though this is often a  type of problem, I don't think it is in this case. I couldn't find anything I would consider to be a |reliable source so the subject fails  as far as I am concerned. Happy to consider sources if someone can find some. This issue here seems not to be that notability has not been asserted; more than it has been asserted but not |verified. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: subject does not pass our notability guidelines. The |general notability guideline asks for significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The article cites three sources: the subject's blog http://socrates58.blogspot.com/, a profile he wrote for Amazon http://www.amazon.com/Dave-Armstrong/e/B001JOY5UM and an apologetic work written by the subject http://www.ourcatholicfaith.org/reasons.html. None of these are independent of the subject. A Google search reveals more things written by the subject and discussion of the subject on unreliable blogs and apologetics websites, but none of these is enough to confer notability. I see no reason to think that the subject meets any of the other criteria at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)