Deletion of Armenia–Spain relations

Comment: I'm striking out my vote above per the comment of lifebaka. In case anyone decides to look at the article that they are voting to delete, these two countries have historic ties that have been documented by independent 3rd party sources that go back over a millennium. The Armenian king Leo V (or VI) married a Spanish wife and was later ransomed from Egyptian captivity by the Spanish king Juan I. Even before that, the two countries were part of the Umayyad Caliphate together, at the same time as is indicated by the included map (which Yilloslime has attempted twice to remove). Even more recently, Spain attempted to mediate between Turkey and Armenia in 1920 (independently verified by the New York Times). That clearly meets the notability requirements under Wikipedia:WikiProject_International_relations#Bilateral_relations (which are not set in stone), but also . It is also verifiable and cited that the two countries have had current bilateral relations for over 15 years. There are large numbers of Armenians living in Spain (independently verified) and the two countries have embassies within the other country. Does it serve any purpose whatsoever to erase this article? If anyone can answer that question I'd like to hear it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: fails due to lack of significant coverage in RS. Doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I woulnd't object to a #G5|G5 speedy deletion but I don't think it meets the letter of the law as although he was banned for creating this sort of article, this article was created before that ban
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: for lack of multiple, independent sources actually covering "Armenia–Spain relations". We can pretend an entity existing 1300 years ago (the Umayyad Caliphate) has something to do with today's Republic of Armenia (independent since 1991) and the Kingdom of Spain, but really, let's not. We can also showcase our Google-searching talents by plucking out bits of trivia from decades-old news stories with no contextual relevance, but again, see  for that. We can find trivial details of the sort that we'd never notice outside these inane "rescue" efforts, but no, a ministerial meeting is not evidence of an actual phenomenon, no matter how hard we try to pretend. So let's put a stop to the silliness and delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)