Deletion of Talia Castellano

Comment: While it's not nice to speak ill of the dead, this person is not relevant or encyclopaedic. Just because someone dies and has a sad story that media types (i.e. Ellen) exploit for ratings, is not someone "worthy of notice." Getting on TV and dying of cancer is not an accomplishment, and it is likely that 10 years from now no one but her parents will remember her. We all pass and are forgotten, it doesn't make us unique.  requires that the topic of a bio article be "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded." Sadly, I do not believe this "flash in the pan" sob story meets the bare minimum. Notability not sufficiently established, delete per , , .  Great candidate for a speedy deletion under #A7
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PEOPLE||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:ANYBIO||WP:CSD)

Comment: The argument behind the individual only being notable because of their death, is absolutely repugnant. As sources have demonstrated, the individual passes  and ; as articles have detailed her past, and in particular 'internet personality' status
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ENT)

Comment: Fails , notability not established, agree with comments above especially Williamgeorgefraser
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Okay. Thanks for letting us know that she was a very important person to a lot of people, but could you still focus on the notability with independent sources please, instead of saying a  arguemnt? Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: She passed  and  even before her death, as the same sources of the article (plus the coverage listed above) show. Defining her as "a person who only became notable for her death" is misleading
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ENT)

Comment: Sad event, but there's not much notability here as these kinds of 'dying child has dreams come true' stories happen regularly. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: This person was notable ''before'' her death, internationally for that matter. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/08/08/13-year-old-cancer-patient-wins-breaks-hearts/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2218798/Talia-Joy-Castellano-The-inspiring-CoverGirl-Make-blogger-13-fighting-types-cancer-honorary-face-beauty-giant.htmlhttp://www.aufeminin.com/societe/talia-joy-castellano-la-femme-de-la-semaine-s7019.htmlhttp://blog.sfgate.com/sfmoms/2012/08/10/12-year-old-girl-with-cancer-makes-the-world-smile-and-cry-with-her-inspiring-makeup-tutorials/http://gawker.com/internet-famous-teen-who-inspired-thousands-dies-of-can-805229574   doesn't apply as that is for people who did ''not'' receive significant coverage from multiple reliable sources as this person has, ie, someone's beloved grandpa.   WP:GNG is not about ''how'' someone became notable, but ''if'' someone is notable.  WP:BIO1E clearly states it is for "low profile" individuals which this person was not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)