Deletion of Joseph Borton

Comment: Meets . Nominator didn't do a WP:BEFORE to show the opposite. The nominator nominated (automatically) a large amount of cricketeers. It would have been better to made a bunch of them in one nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: I think that for historical figures like the subject of this article guidelines like  are rather ill-suited, and one should generally look to  and  in these types of cases. However, here the recent additions of sources and improvements to the article show that  and  are amply met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: Plenty on this chap on archives, enough to expand and make an interesting biography of a very early New Zealand cricketer. Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: Passes . The nom made a recent Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#RfC_on_NCRIC|failed RfC to remove the said notability requirements. Since then, they have tried to circumnavigate this by making mass redirects instead. The nom has said that they "Special:Diff/995494268|have no beef with Lugnuts", however following their failed RfC, have seemingly gone out of their way to target artciles I've worked on. Another Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_WP:NSPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|RfC on sporting articles closed with the comments "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". And yet, there have been 25+ AfDs logged by Fram in a 15/20 minute window, indicating no  was used
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Fails , to which NCRIC defers. The sourcing beyond database scrapes of statistics isn't available. Meeting a very low-quality SNG does not provide an exemption from sourcing requirements, especially when said SNG is demonstrably awful at predicting which articles will eventually be shown to meet notability requirements. Predictably, the conversation has moved to personal attacks on the nominator. A redirect to a list of Otago cricketers remains possible, but not a stand-alone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:GNG)