Deletion of List of locations in the Star Fox series

Comment: The question here is whether these locations are important to the encyclopaedic discussion of the topic, or whether they would be better suited to a game guide. These games are shooters, and therefore I do not think locations are important. Perhaps the only game genre that would warrant a list of locations is the adventure game - a list of islands in Riven, for example. In those games, the locations ''are'' the game, in the same way as character lists are important for story-focused games like RPGs. In a shooter without a story, I see little need for a list like this, therefore warrants deletion per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: per nom and #GUIDE/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: The locations themselves need to be focus of non-trivial coverage in order to establish |notability, things like development info or |reliable secondary parties discussing them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: as this "list" is actually a transcription of a game guide and fails #GUIDE. There are no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate |notability outside the Star Fox franchise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:FICT)

Comment: if someone wants it. No secondary information present to establish notability per . Furthermore major violation of #GUIDE. It's hard to think of real-world information about locations in video games like this, so wikipedia shouldn't have an article about it. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Notability established in the primary article. Longstanding consensus holds that lists like this should be split out if they make the main article too long. Wikipedia is not paper. We have room for a logical arrangement of subject material rather than cramming it all into one page. Nomination seems a clear  violation... nom is on the verge of being admonished by ArbCom about excessive/questionable 'merge' actions, so now is putting everything on AfD instead
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: If i (or another wikipedia contributor) were to considerably expand on the details of each level/location/planet, would that satisfy the notability requirements of the page? As an alternate, would that then make it more suited to being on each respective game's page as a section/sub section? allow me to also state that i DO understand it needs to be brought out of an in-universe tone (wikified and made more encyclopedic), and i certainly know and understand that wikipedia is |not a game guide
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)