Deletion of Enrique Máximo García

Comment: Although I don't really speak Spanish, the last line of http://www.laverdad.es/murcia/20080313/opinion/cumulandi-purgamenta-20080313.html this shows that he occupied a named chair, satisfying criterion 5 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: I don't think this article deserves this witch hunt it has undergone. There are thousands of articles about nonsense, thousands of stubs and thousands of articles with false references or information which aren't being persecuted so exhaustively. This article has proved its right to be in the wikipedia, as the articles in spanish and italian haven't caused any problems, as well as the author has received several congratulations for them. It is shameful that some people put such a great effort for this article to be deleted according to some terms of notability, as if it were the score in a contest. All the information given for this article is true an extensive enough, an can be fully contrasted with its sources,so I can't understand the aversion of some people who want this article deleted for a pair of clauses of a bureaucratic form. If you are trying to base the deletion of the article in the failure to fulfill  or , you must also refer to the non-online sources, because all the complaints given here just cover the information that can be found on the Internet. Looking up on libaries, newspaper libraries and other physical sources I'm sure we can find enough data to fulfill  and . So, before accusing of lack of evidences, please consult ALL the sources, not only the convenient ones
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: N||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:N||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: as mentioned, it fails the applicable policies.  It was asserted above that the subject specifically meets  criterion #7:  "The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity."  That is not asserted in either the article or the translated verdad sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: In the end, I am coming down to delete on this one. Of the 4 references given in the article, 3 are from local newspapers (La Verdad and La Opinión de Murcia), 1 from a website of the regional office of "Patrimonio Historico" (I can translate that into French, but not really in English). Two of the journal articles only mention EMG in connection with the localization of a piano forte of a local composer (and one of the few instruments to survive from that time in Spain), one is an obituary. The website of the regional historical office only mentions him in connection with a CD of works of another composer. I find that these sources fail to establish notability according to  and, as already remarked above, there is not enough evidence to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The existence of substantial coverage in reliable sources is exactly what is required by . Once the subject passes that guideline there's no need to argue about which criteria of  or  or  he may or may not get through. The editors of the publications cited have made the decision that the subject is notable, and our practice is to defer to those decisions rather than try to make our own subjective judgements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:ANYTHINGELSE)

Comment: Meets rof and . I ofer you an  "automatically translated" version of the Spanish sources:http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.laverdad.es%2Fmurcia%2F20081214%2Fcultura%2Ffallece-musicologo-historiador-enrique-20081214.html&sl=es&tl=en&history_state0=es|en|El%2520mundo%2520de%2520la%2520cultura%2520y%2520la%2520universidad%2520despide%2520al%2520music%25C3%25B3logo%2520Enrique%2520M%25C3%25A1ximo 1 http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.laverdad.es%2Fmurcia%2F20081215%2Fcultura%2Fmundo-cultura-universidad-despide-20081215.html&sl=es&tl=en&history_state0= 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:N)

Comment: Gonna go with RandomHumanoid on this one. Doesn't appear to meet rof or . I don't think inclusiveness has to mean "include every academic who did his job well." I'm an academic, and I do my job reasonably well, I hope, but I can say without hesitation that as of this moment I do not merit a page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:N)