Deletion of Way of the Dragon 2

Comment: per a little  shows this film as having multiple international releases and enough coverage in multiple languages to meet , and being a Bruceploitation is not an automatic non-notability. Instead we look for sourcing, and finding we keep. While the article might be |tagged for improvement, deletion of an improvable topic does not serve the project nor its readers. And I do agree with {{u|PRehse}} as sending this to deletion just https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Way_of_the_Dragon_2&type=revision&diff=676401802&oldid=676401292 four minutes after it was authored and while it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Way_of_the_Dragon_2&action=history was being actively edited seems just a bit |hurried
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NF||WP:ATD||WP:BITE)

Comment: I'll echo the problems with the nomination timing, especially as regards a pre-Internet era Hong Kong-produced film. Google reveals capsule reviews in several books. The international release schedule is ... interesting, and suggests the possibility of period Chinese or German material or more recent Dutch sources. I'm not saying this is ironclad at passing the notability standards, but there's reason to believe that  could not have been adequately fulfilled in the 4 minutes that passed between article creation and nomination (and in the face of active editing during that time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)