Deletion of Thomas Dickey

Comment: as essentially a disambiguation page.  He maintains (and has contributed to in essential ways) several pieces of notable software.  If they were books, then  would certainly apply, and I think something similar should hold here.  I agree that there's not enough for much of an article, but as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCREATIVE)

Comment: Not sure either the nom or the two delete !voters make particularly strong arguments for their cases. I note that the lynx article has mentioned Dickey special:diff/268719255|for over eleven years, and a redirect seems not unreasonable.{{pb}}I agree that the original article was rightly overwritten: A ~20 word, two sentence, self-sourced stub does not a BLP make. But redirects, as they say, are notably , and I'm interested to learn why the , searching for information on the guy, shouldn't be taken to the nearest thing he's known for
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP||WP:READER)