Deletion of Bangladesh Booty (2nd nomination)

Comment: First AfD was for an article that was essentially jibberish. This second article seems well written (for what it is). Lack of sources is no reason to delete when sources are certainly available. Per  and  this article should be kept and improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ATD)

Comment: Film with no coverage in |reliable sources also has no credible claim to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)