Deletion of Thomas Rathnam (3rd nomination)

Comment: I completed the nom and suggest any passing admin check for possibly passing #G4|G4. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: On exactly '''what''' basis are these "delete and salt" !votes being made? We don't delete based on , and the fact that this article has existed in the past, in a different form with less sources, is '''not''' a valid deletion rationale. Has anyone bothered to examine the sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: on the basis it's been the subject of at least two AfD's (and the first AfD suggests it was deleted three times before that). I can't see anything in the new article to suggest anything of note has happened since the last AfD. The article seems to be there to promote his forthcoming ventures. Suggest the title is 'd too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)