Deletion of Oise-Aisne American Cemetery Plot E

Comment: Originally, the section on Plot E ''was'' merged into the main article, but it was later split off (not by me) due to multiple independent sources and a lot of unique detail that overwhelmed the tame initial article. Frankly, Oise-Aisne Cemetery is no more notable than any of the other two-dozen American military cemeteries in Europe ''except'' for the existence of Plot E, which (as I said) is entirely unique and unprecedented for any military. Nobody has a place like Plot E, which is why it has garnered so much independent journalistic coverage. Nobody else buried their "dishonored dead" in a special, separate, honorless place like that with a full backstory supported by references. There's ample sources, I'm '''really''' not sure the genesis for the objection here...seems extremely spurious in the face of good sources. I'd like to note, for the reviewing admin's record, that "who needs one?" (as stated by the editor requesting deletion) is the most "drive by" excuse for an  I've ever seen
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: I disagree. Plot E is a very special plot. It is very different from your average war cemetery, like the other parts of the cemetery of which it is nominally part, which contain the graves of those who died serving their country. It has special rules and there are distinct sources. Given the size of this article, I think merging would be . I would agree that in general a plot would not warrant its own article, but this is a very special case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)