Deletion of Mark Worth

Comment: notability is marginal at best, while the article fails  to the point of being close to G11. Sourcing is in passing and / or . The amount of advocacy surrounding the page and this AfD discussion makes it a clear "delete" for me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:SPIP)

Comment: The clearly |apparent conflict of interest and effort to promote Worth are blatant and rather... distasteful.  Yes this page should be deleted as it violates the PROMO policy.   We could ~perhaps~ have a WP article about him, but it is not this; nothing like this.  it needs to be rebuilt from scratch. Undisclosed and unmanaged conflicts of interest produces just this kind of content, which damages the integrity of Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:APPARENTCOI)

Comment: Nom gives no valid reason for deletion.  The tone is irrelevant, the number of wikilinks is irrelevant, whether there's synthesis is irrelevant, and the number of GHits is irrelevant.  Thus the nomination itself fails.  However, the guy clearly meets  #1 as his work is very highly cited.  For instance, see https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22mark+worth%22+whistle&btnG= this GScholar search on the guy's name in quotes + the word "whistle" to filter false positives.  For whatever reason his work mostly isn't listed there, so it's hard to calculate h-index, but the number of citations is evident.  This is strong evidence for his being respected by his peers, which is what AUTHOR asks for.  Also, there are interviews with the guy, e.g. http://www.dw.com/en/africa-needs-to-catch-up-with-protection-for-whistleblowers/a-37873356, which, per , establish notability. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:INTERVIEW)

Comment: WP:SOFIXIT. I think that this page needs an editor with the time to remove the puffery and POV, possibly with some sort of protection of the page. But, I agree with comments and links that the subject satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)