Deletion of William-Adolphe Bouguereau gallery (3rd nomination)

Comment: per WP is not a "collections of photographs or media files" in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This belongs in commons, and Wikipedia is not a list of photographs or pictures, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per Tyrenius, with a minor addition from me: not only this is an expansion of the encyclopedical contents of the main article, but also serves to alleviate article size issues. I strongly believe the interpretation of #REPOSITORY given above on this matter to be well-intentioned, but misguided; this entry by no means is "an indiscriminate collection of images", but serves to illustrate the works of the main article's subject, without adding to its already significant size
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Not one valid keep argument yet. There is no denying that this is a repository of images and fails #REPOSITORY. This is already on Commons and no amount of editing will save it. This gallery does not provide any content whatsoever. Deleting it is the only thing that can be done. Consensus is not determined by vote counting. People who don't make valid arguments get ignored
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Commons is an image repository for material that can be used by other projects. It is not a substitute for them. If the material has encyclopedic value then it should be within wikipedia, where it can be monitored by Wikipedia editors, who are not necessarily Commons editors. The Commons page is less attractively laid out and has surplus information. Commons is multilingual. Commons pages can end up looking like http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Louvre this, i.e. downright ugly, which is no way to view art. Commons is a workshop, not a gallery. This page does not fail , which says, ''"Mere collections of photographs or media files with no text to go with the articles. If you are interested in presenting a picture, please provide an encyclopedic context"''. the encyclopedic context is William-Adolphe Bouguereau, which this is a legitimate content fork of. No one would quibble if there was a list of the artist's works. It makes sense to have pictures to go with that list. You can only know art by looking at it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This is a mere collection of images with no article to go along with it, fails #REPOSITORY without question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)