Deletion of KnowledgeTree (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I added better content with a couple of more sources, including a couple of CEO interviews, and removed anything that could be considered advertising.  The article has gone from being nominated for deletion due to being advertorial and weakly sourced with three items to better with nine, and less advertorial.  I read  and don't think any of these sources are routine, brief, passing or simple references.  Please clarify your interpretation(s) so I know what you are referring to.  The whole article now comes from this independent media coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: the article is currently neutrally worded which is an improvement. But the sources remain weak and the coverage does not raise to the level of CORPDEPTH. There are also trivial industry awards, and funding and product news, i.e. 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)