Deletion of List of albums containing a hidden track (2nd nomination)

Comment: I missed the last vote, fortunately the list (I started it) is still there. It's a  useful list that doesn't conflict with the above-mentioned criteria: it is of interest for quite a few people, cf. e.g. the amount of people contributing to the article and/or using it for reference (in Google the list appears as a first result below the article hidden track), and it's not an indiscriminate list (I just read : the list does not contain FAQs/news/statistics/lyrics/plot summaries). The list contains information one cannot find elsewhere. The list should contain only notable hidden tracks, i.e. hidden tracks on albums that deserve a place (a separate article) on Wikipedia or have a special reputation. To decrease the length of the list one could implement List of albums|this system
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Survived its last AfD - rather overwhelmingly - only three months ago; |LISTCRUFT is neither policy nor guideline; nomination concedes concept is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: as list of loosely associated topics per . The intersection of the topics "albums" and "hidden tracks" produces nothing informative about either topic, nor does it reveal a significant shared quality of the albums listed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Passes . I respectfully disagree with the nominator's assertion that this is of limited interest -- quite the opposite, in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: I |kind of like this article (But you see, i've already saved the page on my hard drive, so its no loss to me. I still can browse through it in private use) but the page is |crufty and |indiscriminate. Oh, and Ctjf83, i'd like to direct your attention to  (yes, I know it isn't a free pass to inclusion, but simply stating that "a paper encyclopedia wouldn't cover "Article X" is really a pointless argument). There's also a shorter and better sourced for notability list at hidden track anyways
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:CRUFT||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTPAPER)