Deletion of Evolutionary astrology

Comment: WP:NONSENSE, , , , how many more do we need? This is the kind of crud that gives Wikipedia a bad name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:BOLLOCKS||WP:NN)

Comment: per . This is nonsensical rambling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per , also |poorly written
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:MOS)

Comment: unless it can be shown that this concept is discussed by ''third'' party ''reliable'' sources. As it stands, it is an unbalanced analysis of a book - verifiable only by reference to the original - in violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)