Deletion of Racebannon (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nomination has no substance. The nominator was involved in the previous AfD, and put it on a list of topics he believes should never have an article. The previous AfD was successful mainly because the author of the article was an employee of the band's record label and the article was an obvious puff piece (or so I surmise; I haven't seen the prior version). The group easily passes  for its releases on important labels (Secretly Canadian, Southern Records), and has gotten press in e.g. Allmusic, Pitchfork Media, ''Alternative Press (music magazine)|Alternative Press'' and ''The Stranger (newspaper)|The Stranger
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Bad faith nom. Meets  per Chubbles. Nom should note that the subject does not have to meet every  criterea, and this artist meets criteria 1 (non-trivial third party sources) and 5 (released music on Secretly Canadian, a notable indie record label
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: the nomination was made in good faith.  It is true that I keep a record of articles that have been deleted which I check periodically to see if any have been recreated, but as far as I could see this band failed all criteria on , which is why I nominated it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)