Deletion of Bravo's 100 Funniest Movies

Comment: as it stands, the article is an |indiscriminate collection of information. There's no description of exactly what it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: no major problem with the cat, but the list contravenes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: list and category), but not merely on the principal of "#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|Not a collection of links" -- rather, the fact that this is based on work of a particular for-profit enterprise, makes it copyrighted, and thus presentation of "such a "Bravo's list" would be a copyvio -- since there's no Fair Use argument for its inclusion on Wikipedia. Furthermore, as numerous critics of this list point out, there's no clear criteria for its organisation, making it further, non-notable. (See discussions at: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=486183 RottenTomatoes.com, http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=3141440&st=0&p=5369764& TelevisionWithoutPity.com)  In contrast, however, I'd suggest that the http://www.afi.com/tvevents/100years/laughs.aspx American Film Institute's top 100 comedies of the last 100 years ''would be'' notable, and appropriate for an article/list; it is newsworthy and based on a nomination/voting system: "''AFI distributed a ballot with 500 nominated films to a jury of 1800 leaders from the film community, including film artists (directors, screenwriters, actors, editors, cinematographers, etc.), critics, historians and film executives
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)