Deletion of Pop & Suki

Comment: or at very least merge (see below). Definitely has |significant coverage, but some of the articles are really shallow in content (Elle, NY Times). Others are more about "Pop" or "Suki" or both but not their fashion brand explicitly. And then some, such as the Vogue article, have depth on the company. It isn't worth deleting outright but there is a question of whether the company would be better covered in one of the designer's articles. As for now, I see enough sources to write at least a small article, but a merge might be a consideration if no more coverage is to come. File:Eye close font awesome.svg|14px|link=user:czar/watching|I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Sourced to significant coverage in ''Elle'', ''W Magazine'', ''Paper'', and even ''Vogue''.  Those are all big-name, established, independent, reliable sources for fashion accessories. That's enough to |establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and the sources do not cover the topic in depth and rely on PRIMARY sources for facts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)