Deletion of William A. Tomasso

Comment: or '''merge''' somewhere. It all comes down to whether you believe Tomasso is a . If he is then as Masem indicates  does not apply. But at the moment I don't see any evidence that he is one. Take the current article and delete all discussion of his conviction: would the resulting article survive an AFD? And on a side issue the argument that a '''''completely openly declared''''' COI means we should just ignore the request are obviously wrong: the original poster is behaving perfectly properly here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:PUBLICFIGURE||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I agree with {{u|Horse Eye Jack}} on the reputational issue while requesting deletion. However the coverage on the subject is pretty substantial which makes him notable per . I'm not gonna even cover the COI here, which is obvious
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and perhaps a '''Speedy Keep'''): There appear to be multiple, independent sources providing non-trivial coverage of the subject, which satisfy . Moreover, it is very problematic for an employee of the subject to seek the deletion of an article about their employer. Major  issues here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COI)