Deletion of List of banks of the United States of America

Comment: under #DIR.  Category works much better.  I don't understand how  supersedes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LIST||WP:NOT)

Comment: meets  (information and navigation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: This does not violate #DIR. It's a work in progress. Eventually, the goal would be to have an article for every notable bank on the list. At such a time, there is no doubt that the list would certainly be finite in scope and easily maintainable. If there is a problem with a particular unsourced portion of this page, you know what you can do ("edit this page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Again #DIRECTORY.  The list is unmaintainable.  Much more extensive and accurate lists are available elsewhere, particularly at the http://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp FDIC website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as a hopelessly broad list.  a directory, nor an indiscriminate hosting of information. A category would suffice, as the ''notable'' banks get articles on Wikipedia. Also, you can't cite Wikipedia itself to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS)

Comment: Violates #DIR. #DIR is ''policy'';  is only a ''style guideline'' and is therefore not a reason for keeping a list that violates policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:LIST)