Deletion of Brandon Jennings

Comment: Seems to be plenty of secondary sources available, so passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: There may be problems with the article as it stands, but it certainly passes  as is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a #CBALL|crystal ball.  Everything about this person's perceived notability is based on "What he is projected to do in the future", and not actually based on anything notable he has done (yes, leading a high school team to 100 wins may be good, but not notable here).  When he is the leading NCAA scorer, or moves up to the NBA, then he is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I went back and forth on this one. The USA Today article is important, but it is not about this player. He is merely included in it. If you look at the article it does not establish notability for him. I think that #CBALL|crystal ball is not overly applicable here, as there are sources predicting the future (which can establish notability) but I agree with Emeraude, above, that even a good player is not notable unless he's in a bigger pond
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as a notable player.  |Basketball is not my thing, but he appears to be notable, the stub has good cites, and he's signed with a professional team
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)