Deletion of Seth Morgan Romero

Comment: fails  and . After cutting through all the COI and marketing nonsense, the subject just isn't notable for Wikipedia purposes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The guy is nothing more than a non-notable blogger with a pretension to filmmaking, who has come here under various socks for the purposes of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO||WP:ADVERT)

Comment: I have found information that suggests that ''Malvinworks'' is either Romero or directly represents him by way of a link that redirected to an IMDB post where the new screen name is "sethmorganworks" and the profile is Romero's. http://boardreader.com/thread/Its_kind_of_odd_6bfjoX2wrpit.html http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1268987/board/flat/175972853?d=176062616&p=1#176062616 I want to stress again that if you are a friend, relative, agent, employee, Romero himself, or have a personal stake in Romero's success, PLEASE make sure to be honest about it. Again, you can edit an article about Romero but you should be up front about your relationship with him because it might be a conflict of interest. I'm not trying to be the bad guy, but you've got to understand that it doesn't exactly look good when you have many accounts suddenly sign up only to edit or defend this article. Please look over 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: I've looked pretty hard, going under a number of different variations on Romero's name. There's just no reliable sources out there and none of the sources on the article are considered to be reliable sources that show notability. I want to stress that I'm not doing this because I suspect that the contributors to the article are Romero and his friends or because I have any sort of vendetta against anyone. I don't actually enjoy voting "delete" on articles and would much rather have things kept on Wikipedia than deleted. It's just that in order to be kept articles MUST have reliable sources that pass  and there must be enough of them to show that Romero passes  or , which he doesn't, despite his accomplishments. While I wish him well and hope that he does get this notability in the future (thus getting to laugh on E! about how his wiki entry was deleted back in 2012), he doesn't have it now and saying that he might achieve notability with his next film is just  and we can't keep articles because someone might become notable one day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ENTERTAINER||WP:BIO||WP:CRYSTAL)