Deletion of Jonas Conley

Comment: I think the nom sums it up nicely.  The sources alone are too local and really primary in nature.  Nothing else exists that even approaches |significant coverage.  Interesting, well written and formatted, but not notable via WP:GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: In addition to above searches (which I repeated myself), I've also searched ProQuest's historical newspaper database to see if anything shows up, and nothing did. Even if the subject is notable, we can't |verify it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)