Deletion of Syed Zahur Ahmad

Comment: This is a somewhat poor nomination, admittedly of a poorly-written article. An argument from  is almost never valid unless it is about the quality rather than the number of results; and the article contains (and contained when nominated), in the statement that he was joint Secretary of the All India Muslim League from 1919 to 1926, a plausible - if rather less than definitive - indication of notability which is supported by http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QS7FmiBwt-QC&pg=PA360 this reliable source (but scroll down towards the end of the page), which was already given in the article when nominated. The nominator also seems to have been unaware that "Syed" is an honorific rather than a proper name and that transcriptions of Urdu/Hindi names into English can vary, so some results may only be found by using {{Find sources|Zahur Ahmad}} and {{Find sources|Zahur Ahmed}} instead - though unfortunately (as the source already cited shows) with the rider that another person with almost exactly the same name (but generally referred to as "Shaikh" rather than "Syed") was prominent at the same time as, and in similar circles to, the subject of this article. I also note that the creator of the article has added further references in the last few days - unfortunately, I have not managed to identify them firmly enough to assess their reliability.  But for this difficulty and the one of sorting out whether any particular reference is referring to the subject or his namesake, I would probably have voted Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)