Deletion of The Gay Travel Guide for Tops and Bottoms

Comment: I've found some other articles about the book, but I was unable to find any reviews that were in sources I could say is completely reliable. I've added six sources to the article, one of which was previously down in the EL section. Three of them talk about the book's release and run a very thin line between trivial and in-depth depending on how you want to see this. The other three talk about Linkedin dropping the book's ad from their site. This is sort of inbetween as far as I'm concerned and notability or the lack thereof could be argued in either direction. It's not enough for me to give a resounding keep, but it's enough to where I wouldn't argue if it's kept. However, we shouldn't keep things because it |wouldn't do any harm. We have to establish that it's notable first. Server space isn't really the issue here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOHARM)