Deletion of The Mullans

Comment: Aside from the question of whether or not the EuroVision is sufficiently notable to carry over under , that still doesn't explain why that policy should suddenly apply to what is clearly not a biographical article. As for , number 9 applies to winners and runners-up, not #16. And point 10 is not about contestants (plus it says that if that is the only claim to notability, a separate article is probably not warranted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:BAND)

Comment: what is the point of this nomination?. covered by 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: I don't see how  applies to this at all -- this article isn't a biography. And if it was, it seems to me BIO1E would support deletion, not keeping. As it stands, being a group, this article must meet . And that does not seem entirely the case at this point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:BAND)

Comment: about the points BabbaQ is raising; I've read through  once more and it says ''"failure to meet any of these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted; conversely, meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept."'' There may be other points that could be raised other than the group's involvement/participation at this event perhaps
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: Group fails |basic notability. Being a part of Eurovision does not account for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suntribe. In a summary, notable under  but having a bio and an a entry article is unnecessary per , and really it makes little sense having two articles which ''de facto'' cover the same subject - an entry into a contest
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC||WP:BIO1E)