Deletion of Failure (2nd nomination)

Comment: per : ''"such articles must go beyond what would be found in a dictionary entry (definition, pronunciation, etymology, use information, etc.), and include information on the social or historical significance of the term."''  which this (roughly) does and further sources do exist to improve it so I don't think  applies. However, while it could change, the article is still written very much like an extended definition
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WORDISSUBJECT||WP:NOTDICT)

Comment: while agree that we are  there are some topics that are better covered with an article. This topic is notable and the article covers all aspects of failure including the perception of failure. We have to be careful not to have , but we can overcome that problem with careful and responsible editing. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT||WP:SYNTH||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)