Deletion of Gary Namie

Comment: Article needs work, but passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: There is not enough referenced material to establish notability. The book holdings is quite impressive, but not enough on its own and is also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Has at least one book, ''The bully at work'', currently in more than 800 major libraries worldwide according to http://www.worldcat.org WorldCat
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I'm |rather surprised that the three editors above have claimed |non-notability without explaining how http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Gary%20Namie%22&cf=all&sa=N&tab=np these books and http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?um=1&ned=uk&hl=en&num=100&q=%22Gary+Namie%22&cf=all these news articles covering the subject don't confer notability. It takes hardly any more time to find them than it does to type, "I agree, non-notable", or, "clearsic non-notable", and certainly less time than it takes to create an AfD discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:JNN)