Deletion of Ozark Air Lines Flight 982

Comment: the article right now reads more like Template:Story|a story than an encyclopedic entry, and the article should probably have at least one more reliable source with significant coverage, but the report from the National Transportation Safety Board|NTSB pulls a ton of weight, and combined with the two articles from the ''Sioux City Journal'' (one of which admittedly briefly touches on the event), I think there's enough to warrant its own short article. If the article is not kept, it should at least be merged per {{u|Metropolitan90}} above. All that said, I have no idea where the nominator is pulling claims of  and  from
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: a crash of a Douglas DC-9 on a scheduled flight that results in the aircraft being written off. Lack of deaths ≠ lack of notability.  is already met. Article is a mess, it would benefit from an infobox and some structure, but needing improvement is never a reason to delete and article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The only claim in the nomination that is worthy of discussion is whether or not the subject of the article meets .  A crash of a commercial jetliner in regular service resulting in a total loss of the aircraft and injuries to passengers, resulting in ongoing news coverage despite occurring on a busy news day (happened the same day as the return to earth of Apollo 8 and a different fatal air crash at Chicago O'Hare) clearly meets notability standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Not really sure what's going on here with this nomination... clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)