Deletion of Jason Diamond (2nd nomination)

Comment: nbsp; Meets notability and WP:NOT requirements.&nbsp; A source of sources was shown at the previous AfD.&nbsp; Note that the policy WP:PROMO itself merely requires NPOV, whereas the argument here is that anything said that shows the commercial attraction of the entity has the effect of promoting the entity.&nbsp; But the article would fail NPOV if the commercial  attraction of the entity were omitted, so the argument is self-contradictory.&nbsp; No problems with promotional tone have been identified, and if there are any claimed, they can be fixed with diting policy.&nbsp; Note also that the arguments to notability have not properly reviewed the alternatives to deletion, where this topic is a major element in Dr. 90210.&nbsp; The sources provided by Cunard include the statement five years after Dr. 90210 stopped production, "its stars have become hugely in-demand surgeons, with all of the attendant hoopla -- and additional business -- that comes with fame... Diamond is the ringleader of a 90210 plastic-surgeon posse that is part of a lucrative partnership with the American British Surgical & Medical Centre...in Dubai's Deira district."&nbsp; The challenge for Wikipedia here is to continue to encourage both our content contributors and our AfD participants to understand and support our policies and guidelines.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E)

Comment: Per . Sources provided by Cunard. And many more independent reliable sources listed https://www.jasonbdiamond.com/media/ here. I have no personal opinion for or against Doctor, such as "He's a busy surgeon so what" or "He's a great surgeon.". Rather I look at evidence ie. the existence of sources, per our core guideline 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTE)