Deletion of I Sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter

Comment: There is also https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337549572_I_Sexually_Identify_as_an_Attack_Helicopter this article in ''Transgender Studies Quarterly''. This is what a  search is for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: With the ''Wired'' coverage, sufficiently notable. And per , I like it, and like the argument that ''this'' will be what people find if they come looking for the meme
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: meets , has multiple |sources that review/cover this short story
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: as it is not just a one-event, but did get a review also. So overall coverage meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: AfDed 4 minutes after creation, what an admirable dispatch. I admit that this is probably a bit of a borderline case as regards notability, given that we have two third-party sources, ''Rocket Stack Rank'' and ''File 770'', who are probably to some degree . But they are both publications that have received significant awards or award nominations in their field, which I believe allows us to qualify them as reliable sources under the "established expert on the subject matter" exemption. And, if I may invoke  for perhaps the first time ever, I believe that it is in the interest of Wikipedia and perhaps the public at large for readers to find a serious article about a piece of literature when they search for this particular phrase, not a disparaging meme. (Also, given how the Internet works, it's likely that more media will pick up this topic in the coming days, but that's of course just crystalballing on my part
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:IAR)