Deletion of Patriotic Nigras (5th nomination)

Comment: It's somewhat remarkably well sourced given the subject matter, surely passes notability requirements as it has in the past.  The remaining deletion arguments smell like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I concur with Thibbs, I'm not sure how exactly the nominator or the "delete" !votes are defining notability. The article has |many third party reliable sources discussing the subject in significant detail. That's all that's needed, and that's what is already present in the article. I don't mean to make bad-faith assumptions, but the people in favor of deletion's rationale seems to border more along the lines of . I don't like or condone this sort of activity from internet trolls either, but I also know that that has no bearing on  Wikipedia's standard of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I agree with the keeps above.  The article is clearly  and perhaps Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patriotic Nigras (6th nomination) should be ed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SALT)