Deletion of David Quinn (Actor)

Comment: he seems to meet . A page being under edit wars or revert wars doesn't make it deletion-worthy, just protect it for a week
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Please read |Wikipedia's guidelines to citing sources, then we can talk further.  BTW, you did not answer my question.  Again I ask, what is so objectionable about the material on the article as it stood when I was editing it.  Basically, there is nothing in the article that is not '''readily available''' on the internet.  Believe me, I agree that the article should be deleted.  Not for your reasons though.  As I said, previous editors are claiming that the material they added is '''copyright'''.  Keeping a spirit of good faith and respect for other people's opinions, I believe that on those grounds alone, it's reasonable to delete the article.  As no '''copyright''' material, whatsoever, belongs on Wikipedia. Just let it go
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Had a "multi-year stint as the host of 3-2-1 Contact" - so he was one of the lead characters of a very notable 1980s educational TV program. Also nominated for an Emmy, and is a Peabody Award-winner. Clearly notable and encyclopedic, and meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: more than notable enough as per established  guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)