Deletion of Dragomir R. Radev

Comment: as exhaustively explained above. Nominator is advised to read rof and carry out efore before making any more time-wasting nominations in this area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:B)

Comment: A quick search of his name turns up papers by him that have been cited by 547 others, in addition to various other papers that have been cited multi-hundreds of times. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dragomir+R.+Radev&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=ws While I'm no expert on professors and their notability, the amount of impact he appears to have had on his field makes it appear that he passes  #1. Being a recipient of the ACM "Distinguished Scientist" award seems to pass  #2. Additionally, judging by all the entries on him in various universities, he may also meet  #4. Thus I believe that this article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Six papers with over 100 cites each in Google scholar is enough to convince me of a pass of #C1. I'm not convinced the ACM Distinguished Scientist is enough for #C2 — it's a grade of membership more than an award, a step below fellow which would be enough for #C3 — but there's enough other reasons to keep this that it doesn't matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: What sort of deletion rationale is 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)