Deletion of Tabiti

Comment: agree per {{u|RebeccaGreen}} and IMO, Clearly meets . Special:Contributions/65.18.124.149|65.18.124.149
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per sources provided above. Rest of the arguments are simply 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATADD)

Comment: Clearly meets . There appear to be more reliable sources which could be added, and possibly more information, but the article as it now stands provides basic info
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: am i looking at the same article? there are 4 references presently cited in the article, (let alone the sources i have listed above), not, "an one obscure source", this afd reminds me of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: meets , article with its references now reflects this (thanks to above editors' efforts}, numerous books refer/mention her, including (note: not all may be deemed "scholarly":)) https://books.google.com.au/books?id=_XJ_AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA179&lpg=PA179&dq=Tabiti+goddess&source=bl&ots=Ix4TTwyKlf&sig=HiaLPmz1uCEDgsIq_5OkJiIvXZI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi319LesPzeAhWGfisKHdt6Cuw4ChDoATAAegQIChAB#v=onepage&q=Tabiti%20goddess&f=false ''The Routledge Dictionary of Gods and Goddesses, Devils and Demons'', https://books.google.com.au/books?id=gVOGAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA251&dq=Tabiti+goddess&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHyPPhsPzeAhWUe30KHfYnDyYQ6AEILTAB#v=onepage&q=Tabiti%20goddess&f=false ''Goddesses for Every Day: Exploring the Wisdom and Power of the Divine Feminine Around the World'', https://books.google.com.au/books?id=Io7i9VhQ6wEC&pg=PT91&dq=Tabiti+goddess&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHyPPhsPzeAhWUe30KHfYnDyYQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Tabiti%20goddess&f=false ''The Goddess Guide: Exploring the Attributes and Correspondences of the Divine Feminine'', https://books.google.com.au/books?id=mMYsAQAAMAAJ&q=Tabiti+goddess&dq=Tabiti+goddess&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHyPPhsPzeAhWUe30KHfYnDyYQ6AEIUDAI ''The Encyclopædia Britannica'' (1895 on), https://books.google.com.au/books?id=GWcjhsRCWG4C&pg=PA57&dq=Tabiti+goddess&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixhbKHufzeAhXadn0KHRBxDfA4ChDoAQgzMAM#v=onepage&q=Tabiti&f=false ''The Golden Deer of Eurasia: Scythian and Sarmatian Treasures from the Russian Steppes : the State Hermitage, Saint Petersburg, and the Archaeological Museum, Ufa
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: easily passes  per https://books.google.com/books?id=3XlkAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA127&dq=tabiti&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz1IiZxfPeAhUMqI8KHWx_CTwQ6AEIMDAC#v=onepage&q=tabiti&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=ARyeneZne9gC&pg=PA71&dq=tabiti+Scythians&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjLnZbDxvPeAhUDr48KHeQcAGwQ6AEILDAB#v=onepage&q=tabiti%20Scythians&f=falsehttps://books.google.com/books?id=jixfDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA47&dq=tabiti&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiz1IiZxfPeAhUMqI8KHWx_CTwQ6AEIUDAI#v=onepage&q=tabiti&f=false. I am rather inclined to suggest '''procedural close''' because no policy based reasoning has been provided and there was clear failure of . The months later block of {{U|Falconfly}} is irrelevant because he was an independent editor. I am not going to count the false accuations of sock puppetry made by the nominator because
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)