Deletion of List of NHL playoff series

Comment: since nominator's reasoning isn't really correct. With regards to  above, I'm not sure but I guess it satisfies it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: Saying this page is "indiscriminate" implies that the information was compiled in a thoughtless or haphazard manner. However, one can see that is not the case, as the information is clearly organized with thought and care. In addition, the nominator's rationale "A matrix cataloging every historical NHL playoff matchup" reeks of , by claiming the information on this page is indiscriminate, just because they believe it to be true, without providing any deeper reason for why this page should be deleted. Canuck89
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I'm not in this to win any argument, so I have no reason to withdraw. I'm actually on the fence on this myself. Pardon if I didn't point an established precedent that fits this example exactly. Is correlating data and presenting it in a new fashion considered ? That's what we have here: raw data: team X played team Y in 1965, etc, etc. Lets derive from the raw data that they also played in 1974, 1987, and 2011. Team Y advanced 3 out of the 4 times. Its presented like it is relevant, but in reality all 4 series are vastly unrelated because of player/personal turn over. Is that trivial, is that ? I am trying to find similar articles (or evidence of similar articles in AFDs), but I haven't come across anything
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:CRUFT)