Deletion of Lene Auestad

Comment: Multiple positive reviews in scholarly journals of multiple books suggests a pass per . https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s11231-017-9117-2 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2017.1348451 https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2016.6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-015-9298-0 https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2015.33 I say "tentative" because some (not all) of these reviews are for volumes she edited, rather than books she wrote herself &mdash; still examples of her work being noted and approved of, but arguably less significant than reviews of single-author works
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: per , multiple books with multiple published reviews. However, the article text looks heavily promotional and possibly copied from elsewhere; I've trimmed some definite copyvio from the books section but the rest could probably also use attention
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: meets  with sufficient reviews to pass the bar of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: If you https://www.google.no/search?q=%22lene+auestad%22&hl=en&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjf8bnesd7XAhVhD5oKHRQGCZkQ_AUIDSgE&biw=1680&bih=929 appropriately limit Google search, it turns up very few, mainly local news items that mention her directly. I really don't think that this author meets the notability bar. Having your academic book reviewed in an academic journal within your academic field of research is entirely ''normal'' for academics. If Lene Auestad meets this criteria, we need to write an extra 100,000 articles on academics. On a related note, I think that the  guidelines are so open to interpretation as to be useless
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)