Deletion of Tune Smithy

Comment: as  and failing to meet . Each of the two reviews are for different products: one is for Tune Smithy and the other is for the related, but separate product, Bounce Metronome and does not mention Tune Smithy. Although they are independent and reliable sources with significant mentions of the two products, one such source for each product is not, in my opinion, sufficient to establish notability for either product. If the products were truly notable, there would be additional product reviews or other significant mentions of them. The other listed sources are all passing mentions of the product and do not establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO||WP:GNG)

Comment: as unambiguous 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: No editors have contributed text or sources beyond the most basic of copyediting.  Robert's sources above are product reviews (see ), and nobody cares about the .  On the day of article creation, Robert also created a user page in which he https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Robertinventor&oldid=187984741 proudly proclaimed that Tune Smithy was his best selling software.  This is part of a pattern of Wikipedia editing intersecting with Robert's financial self promotion.   At Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Robertinventor,_again|this ANI proceeding its observed that Robert's work here on Mars overlaps the work he sells on Amazon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP||WP:GOOGLETEST)