Deletion of Pepperfry

Comment: because passes  and .   All issues with this article can be fixed by normal community editing.  Here are just a few starter sources of the indy/rs/sigcov variety
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: It WAS a clear case of , but I do not think it is not notable. A quick http://searchindiannews.in/search.html?query=pepperfry#&gsc.q=pepperfry&gsc.page=1 search shows us that it definitely satisfies  and . It only needed some heavy pruning, which I think I have managed to do. All PR sites were removed and now it only contains links of national dailies and op-eds and interviews. So, I think, it is fixed for now. However, I agree with SwisterTwister's concerns of companies and brands who create articles here just for promotional and advertising purposes. The worse are biographies of clearly non-notable persons. But, I personally feel, that deletion is not always a solution when we are trying to create an encyclopedia. This article, moreover, needs monitoring for at least few weeks for fear of edits by COI and spammers. Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:REFBOMB||WP:CORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: Passes  per a review of |available sources. Source ''examples'' include, but ''are not limited to'' those listed below. Also, the article has been heavily copy edited after being nominated for deletion, as per the page's https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pepperfry&action=history Revision history, and does not have a promotional tone at this time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: The sources I provided above are all bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, wp:rs|reliable sources, and they all provide wp:sigcov|significant coverage. These are ''not'' press releases, as evidenced in part by utilizing Google searches using the ''titles'' of these article, in which links are only present for these articles themselves, as opposed to press releases, which typically have the same article hosted on many various websites. These sources qualify that the company passes 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)