Deletion of Roxy Olin

Comment: Plainly passes the |general notability guideline. A quick https://www.google.com/search?q=Roxy+Olin&oq=Roxy+Olin&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j0l4.349j0j1&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8#q=Roxy+Olin&tbm=nws GNews search reveals well more than the minimum amount of significant coverage in reliable sources, stretching from (as far as I can see) 2009 to present day. There was actually an article about her published literally 13 hours ago http://www.bustle.com/articles/98906-what-happened-roxy-olin-from-the-city-whitney-ports-former-partner-in-crime-is-as-fabulous here (although, granted, it's of the "whatever happened to..." variety :). Her failure to pass the |subject-specific notability guideline for actresses is irrelevant if she passes GNG, and in any event that presumes her notability is entirely based on her career as an actress when she is also apparently a socialite
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: as not notable.  The Google search above does give a couple of pages of hits, but beginning on page 3 they are mostly tangential, non-substantive mentions of her, mostly to do with her friendship with Whitney Port. Of the rest, most are blogs, or aren't independent (e.g. MTV), or again only mention her briefly in relation to something else. Mere mentions do not rise to the criteria of significant coverage. It looks like there is a single good source, the New York Magazine item, which is an in-depth interview.  This certainly doesn't meet , her appearance on a reality tv show, and a small role in a single other program don't meet . Normally, I'd say this might be a case of , but most of these cites are from five or more years ago
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR||WP:TOOSOON)