Deletion of Hermetism

Comment: is this a ? I'm not sure I understand enough of this article (or it's history with sister articles). My concern is that this seems to qualify under . Can anyone elucidate
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per . Thanks for the comments, btw! It seems there's potentially a problem with |Reliable Sources here as well. Article also seems to skirt  and . But the main problem is . Wikipedia already has an article on Hermeticism (very well-souced, in fact). This article just presents an alternative spin on Hermeticism. Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Hermetism and Hermeticism refer to two different eras.  The original followers were called Hermetists, following Hermetism, the philosophy or religion or movement of Hermes.  After the Corpus Hermeticum was rediscovered by the West in the 15th century, the new followers were called Hermeticists, because they followed not directly the teachings of Hermes, but of what was Hermetic.  Hermetism is the precursor to Hermeticism, according to scholars.  People call this junk history, but whereas I have added verifiable citations from several sources, the attackers are attempting to violate  and actually performing OR by deciding that they know off hand more about the subject, and lacking citations, they attack citations from reputable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)