Deletion of Democracy & Nature (4th nomination)

Comment: I'll just base my defense on the pillar and policy of  (use common sense). Wikipedia is based upon footnotes to so-called reliable sources to provide for verifiability of the information they contain. Peer-reviewed journals, such as ''Democracy and Nature'' (published by Taylor and Francis) are given extremely high consideration as reliable sources. We NEED information on these journals to help our readers assess the merits and limitations of each journal. It should be extremely important to us all to create and maintain pages such as Democracy & Nature — whether or not the information contained therein is fully independent of the journal itself. This is common sense, is it not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IGNOREALLRULES)

Comment: per Wikipedia:NJournals. I have access to two huge academic library collections, one in my home state, and one in another state through "visiting scholar" status there, and I did some library searching after reading all the comments here. There simply aren't sources to support the scholarly impact of this defunct journal or to '''independently''' verify facts about the journal under the Wikipedia  | policy on verifiability. Some journals are just very obscure, that's all, and Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory | Wikipedia is not a directory of every obscure journal that has gone out of business
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)