Deletion of BitGamer (2nd nomination)

Comment: 65,000 gamers?  Says who, the site?  And sorry, but the way  works, the answer to "the subject is too much out of the public eye to gain significant coverage" isn't "... so it's okay to ignore  and the GNG."  It's "... and that's why it doesn't qualify for an article." ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: There is nothing to merge to. The only reason BitGamer avoided deletion last time was an '''unproven''' assertion that the Underground Gamer article would fulfill  and  instead. In reality, it would fail them for the same exact reasons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: These days 65,000 isn't a big number anymore, with popular membership going up to 7 to 8 figures. More importantly no |reliable sources covering the subject in detail could be found, therefore making it |unverifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)