Deletion of Medusa (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: This article is well-sourced and scoped and should be maintained per our |editing policy.  Greek mythology in popular culture is much worse - a grotesque list which needs to be completely rewritten
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: The fictional monster of the ''Dungeons & Dragons'' franchise does not meet the |general notability guideline as an individual subject. The article is referenced with |primary sources and tertiary sources, but no secondary sources that make analytic or evaluative claims about the chronology and which for notability purposes are the ones that provide the most objective evidence of notability, so there is no presumption that the Medusa of ''Dungeon & Dragons'' deserves to have a stand-alone article. A |search engine test shows nothing to presume something different. Given the lack of detailed mentions of this particular Medusa in reliable secondary sources, I'm not convinced that a merge to Greek_mythology_in_popular_culture#Medusa would be the best option but, since there are other versions of Medusa mentioned there that are even weaker, I suppose it's an acceptable alternative
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY||WP:SET)