Deletion of Jiz Lee

Comment: until I see proof positive that a "butt plug-shaped award" qualifies as a "well-known and significant industry award", I must disagree with my distinguished colleagues.  I do not think that the relatively high standards of  are met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: per Spartaz's sound argument and per . Wikimandia's keep, above, is well-reasoned, but there is no relevant content in the article and both the book and film discussed in those sources remain as yet unreleased. I believe it's a bad idea to maintain an inadequate, borderline promotional BLP with essentially no content relating to its subject's actual significance/potential notability. I'm also a bit leery about accepting notability based on a not-yet-published book by a not-yet-published author
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per obvious lack of  by the nominator and per sources by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Passes  by being the recipient of a well-known and significant industry award that is not a scene-related/ensemble category. The Feminist Porn Award has enough mainstream media coverage to pass  (http://www.vice.com/read/turning-assholes-inside-out-at-the-ninth-annual-feminist-porn-awards, http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a39206/why-this-woman-is-calling-for-a-boycott-of-the-feminist-porn-awards/, & http://www.torontosun.com/2012/04/24/positive-power-of-feminist-porn) and is therefore well-known/significant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: there can't be any doubt that this person |is notable, look at all the sources provided above, I suggest the anti-porn warriors take it easy every once in a while
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)