Deletion of Nico Hines

Comment: per . We all do stupid things every now and then that don't deserve a Wikipedia article on them. ''Possibly'' merge to the Daily Beast article in a controversies section: you could argue that publishing it unedited is very poor judgment akin to http://deadspin.com/how-sb-nation-published-their-daniel-holtzclaw-story-1761030353 this case, worthy of mention. But an entire article on this person solely covering this one topic verges on cyberbullying
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: under . The controversy is worth mentioning on The Daily Beast (where it is indeed covered), but there's insufficient justification for a separate article, and especially not one framed as a BLP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G10)

Comment: keeping the history due to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Daily_Beast#Nico_Hines.2C_and_controversies_in_general ongoing talks at the talk page for ''The Daily Beast''. This article appears to fail |the inclusion guideline for journalists
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: Having read , I am now even more sure than ever before that this needs to be deleted. Textbook case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)