Deletion of Beer Doctors

Comment: as  at the least, with no opinion on whether the beer atlas deserves an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I found a little press on the atlas, enough to make me think it might be notable: http://www.startribune.com/three-new-books-explore-the-world-of-beer/456142303/ https://www.heraldnet.com/life/modern-atlases-are-about-everything-from-fake-places-to-beer/ https://www.boomermagazine.com/educated-appreciation-beer/ https://www.beeradvocate.com/articles/17351/what-role-does-geography-play-in-beers-evolution-two-professors-explore-the-answer-in-a-new-book/. But I didn't find enough about these two people, separately from the atlas, to convince me that they are independently notable, through , , or . Perhaps there are reviews of the edited volumes but, as edited volumes, they don't count for enough. Maybe it's : if they write another book on beer that gets enough attention, they can pass . And if either one of them becomes notable through scholarly accomplishments, we should have a separate article for that one rather than a joint article as now. But for now, if we have an article on the atlas, we can redirect this term to it, and otherwise delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:TOOSOON||WP:BIO1E)