Deletion of Griggstown cow

Comment: The Griggstown Cow was a fairly well-known cryptid in New Jersey, and it's received some significant coverage from New Jersey- or cryptozoology-related sources. Aside from what's already in the article, here are a few more sources that I was able to find with a few minutes of Googling: https://patch.com/new-jersey/southbrunswick/the-legend-of-the-ghost-cow http://weekinweird.com/2011/08/31/ghost-jumped-moon/ http://franklinreporter.com/misty-halloween-perfect-time-see-griggstown-ghost-cow/ http://themanchestermirror.com/Mirrorprint/2016/7July/The-Burger-Review-LayoutFINAL.pdf (The fourth source is mostly about hamburgers, but it also has a brief article on the Griggstown Cow.) All of these sources are from 2011 or later, so contrary to the  argument, this cryptid still had enduring coverage 9+ years after its death
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Per Captain Occam, the Griggstown Cow has received coverage in newspapers, magazines and books for years, and it's this extensive coverage about the cow in reliable and verifiable sources that exceeds the notability standard. The nominator fails to understand  and has utterly failed to comply with the obligations of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I'm not finding any  for this.  There are certainly lots of places that talk about it, but none that meet the definition of .  The one source that looks promising is the Philadelphia Inquirer article.  I found https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/199347149/ the text on newspapers.com.  It's a little hard to make sense out of the OCR text, but the significant part is: {{quote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: This passes  standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)