Deletion of Puppy chow

Comment: Doesn't violate , and it isn't written in a |promotional manner. It's E|notable to the point of some other food articles, for which the bar seems to be a bit lower than other topics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:PROMOTIONAL||WP:NOTE)

Comment: I'm somewhat familiar with this snack too, but notability doesn't depend on how well known a subject is—notability depends on |significant coverage in reliable sources. To substantiate arguments to keep the article, reliable, ''|secondary'' sources that discuss this subject in detail should be brought up here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: There are a number of different homemade snacks that are made out of cereal. Most of them are , they exist and that's about it. Per  they probably don't deserve individual articles and I am not familiar with any policy regarding what is essentially notable about individual pieces of cuisine. It is something I'd expect to find here though. If someone were to merge them and actually research some notable information it would likely make a worthwhile article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE||WP:ENN)