Deletion of Sandy Munro

Comment: I am not sure if the nominator or any of the other delete voters in this discussion have done a proper . A cursory google research reveal multiple news articles from Inverse, CNet, Jalopnik, Inside EVs, Torque News reveal evidence that there may be sources not already covered by the article itself. All of them appear to acknowledge him as an automobile expert, many specifically featured coverage of his opinions of products from the likes of Tesla in detail which meets , and it is apparent that there is |sustained coverage as he has been active for a number of years in the public eye. Per , a deletion rationale based on the current state of the article's sourcing does not comply with Wikipedia policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SIGCOV||WP:SUSTAINED||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: No evidence he passes . Passing mentions are not sufficient for , either. The subject hasn't done anything to merit an entry in encyclopedia, at least not based on what the article says and what I can see in the sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: per Mztourist and Johnpacklambert. There's absolutely nothing in the article to suggest . {{u|Andrew Davidson}}'s failure to  is also troubling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:AGF)

Comment: fails  as it lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)