Deletion of Jewish-Palestinian Living Room Dialogue Group

Comment: What you need to do is show why this group is notable. I don't think you can, but like everyone else here, if it turns out to meet the policies linked above, you can convince us of such and the article can be kept. Look at the  and  criteria and find reliable sources (these cannot be self-published, written by people involved in the group, etc.  provides a nice definition for these sources, apply that to the  criteria as well. You might find this helpful: Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines_to_cite_in_deletion_debates#Favoring_keeping_or_merging &#8213;&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG||WP:GNG||WP:NORG)

Comment: Surprisingly the subject of the article passes . However this "article" is a trainwreck. It's written in a promotional tone, not an encyclopedic one, and is overall a mess. Wikipedia is not the "About Us" section of a website. Blow it up and start over
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Whatever  it may have - and it doesn't seem to have a lot of that, either - it doesn't have the necessary coverage in proper sources to demonstrate notability. I'd remove the spam links, but as this article will necessarily be deleted, no point
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LOCALFAME)