Deletion of Ahmed al-Nami

Comment: This is silly. There's tons of well-sourced information about this obviously notable figure. The 9/11 Commission Report ''does'' cover Al Nami as an individual, from his origin to his recruitment and training to his activities in the U.S., to his appearance in various videos, to his newsworthy death. There are many, many reliable secondary sources. Like Herostratus and Tank Man, Al Nami is primarily remembered for one event, which is the way he wanted it, and like Herostratus and Tank Man he passes our notability guidelines with flying colors. Does anyone really think it would benefit Wikipedia in any way to delete a thorough, meticulously researched article on one of the 9/11 hijackers? The mind reels. (By the way,  doesn't apply ''at all'', since it's a part of  and Al Nami is quite resoundingly dead.) &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:BLP)

Comment: I keep waffling on this one (almost was gonna !vote a "very weak keep").  Note that since the guy is dead, many of the  concerns go away -- but the points in 1E about increased maintenance overhead for the redundant material is still valid.  The source seem reliable enough, but the notability of the content they cover is pretty borderline.  I don't think it will hurt the project significantly to keep it, but on balance I'm going for the redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This individual is plainly someone whom many people will want to research, and there are abundant |“reliable sources”.  The Felt article should, of course, not have been deleted; its AfD was grossly mishandled
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)