Deletion of PaGaLGuY (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nomination was made on the basis of there being no reliable sources - that's no longer true.  We now have coverage from The Times of India and the Economic Times, and just enough to meet . Does the nominator want to withdraw the nomination, or do any of the others who voted delete based on the original poor sourcing want to change their votes
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm sorry gang, but just because this this the third nomination doesn't mean that it should be deleted.  The first nomination was closed as keep, the second as no consensus.  The sources seem to be on pace with what we seek to have for .  This third nomination seems to violate  to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FORUMSHOP)