Deletion of Pneumatic Detach

Comment: I checked on LexisNexis, google and ''nothing'' notable has been written about this band. Discogs is not a notable source, as anyone can add their releases to the site. So by nature the article fails . The articles cited are trivial. Furthermore, Hive Records is ''not'' a notable record label, so the band does not fit criteria #4 of . Essentially, it just fails every other aspect of . All all this not to mention that this AfD has been vandalized into oblivion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: fails . Only appearance in Google News Archive is in a festival listing -- a festival which itself fails to garner any more results
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: The only criteria of  that this band might pass is the label. I have a feeling Hive Records is not notable, but that's another discussion. It fails the other 10 criteria out right. The article is overwhelmingly autobiographical and the newly added references are questionable (some primary). This is the only comment I'll make on this AFD. I challenge the author to do the same: make your statement and then let others contribute. There is no need to rebut EVERYONE'S comments. If the article is truly worthy then others will show their support to keep it. AND DO NOT PROCLAIM, like you did before, that my silence afterwards signifies a change in my stance. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: no notability according to the criteria by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)