Deletion of Forbidden relationships in Judaism

Comment: reading the comments above, I'd like to point out that this article is '''not''' at AfD because of a dispute about notability. It is at AfD because it is alleged that it is a duplicate, and apparent  of the subject matter of '''Arayot''' article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: More importantly, accuracy and "factual" nature is irrelevant to this AfD. This AfD is not really about accuracy, or about "fact". Its about the fact that this article appears to be a duplicate of an already pre-existing article, and possibly even constitutes a |POV-FORK
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: This is |notable, sourced information that therefore meets Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusions. Besides being covered in an entire section of the Bible itself, there are many books found on Google Books that discuss this topic. The Arayot article is not the same thing; the articles are related and can be linked to one another, but provide different factual information
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: this accurate and factual article that is based on the best primary source, the Bible itself in full keeping with  and . Classical Bible-based Judaism=Torah Judaism which is what all of Orthodox Judaism strictly observes as a PRACTICAL matter to this day especially in the subject matter of this article. It needs to have more "meat" added and more sections to reflect the views of other streams of Judaism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:VERIFY)

Comment: While this discussion has been wide ranging, AfD really is not intended to settle what is in essence a question of how best to structure and cover a notable topic.  Deletion of this topic as a fork is not required; reconciliation/merger of the articles should occur, but can be considered by interested editors without an artificial deadline.  wisely distinguishes articles that explicitly are about a POV from the normal prohibition; no reason to deviate from that here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: based on...primary source'' - see . As for Classical Judaism and Orthodox Judaism, '''where is the reliable source''' confirming that 100% of Orthodox Judaism, including that in non-Western non-English speaking countries, or confirming that Classical Judaism has '''absolutely nothing''' at all to add to the bible about this. As for ''Torah Judaism'', here is a quote from that article - ''The phrase Torah Judaism implies a belief and practice of Judaism that is based on the Torah ('''meaning the inclusion of the entire''' Torah, Tanakh, '''Talmud, and all the rabbinic authorities that followed''') ''. Given your username, I assume you have some familiarity with the Talmud (though I apologise if I am wrong about this), so you must realise how much the Talmud comments on the Bible. Presumably you also know a little about the Targums, and how they are paraphrases not mere translations. So there is clearly likely to be more than just the bible, in classical Judaism, about this.  This article has a title with '''in Judaism''' at the end of it. Where is the '''in Judaism''' bit
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY)