Deletion of Dodil

Comment: I think a sitrep will be useful here. Currently, we have an article that has been pretty much fully created and copy-edited by a sock and a contributor with a COI. The article is also filled with well written damage limiting phrases such as ''One reviewer managed to break the outer silicone after not following the instructions, causing the product to fail.'' and then an attempt to highlight the Unique selling proposition|USP of the product. Sources are not substantial in any way, most of which are trade-mags or PR (which I must remind are not appropriate for Wikipedia). IMO the article still fails the basic  requirements and various other rules that most contributors somehow manage to stick to
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)