Deletion of Leslie Kanes Weisman

Comment: per  and . Its snowing in here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not understanding why this was nominated for deletion. She is clearly a notable architect, writer, educator, passing  and , and also clearly passes  due to the fact that she's a full professor & co-founder of several academic programs, and held a named, endowed position, George A. Miller Endowment professorship at U of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/culture-magazines/weisman-leslie-kanes  A 5-minute search on Google shows these two Awards: Public Servant of the Year https://suffolktimes.timesreview.com/2011/01/2010-public-servant-of-the-year-leslie-kanes-weisman/, NFWFWF Founders Award https://www.northforkwomen.org/fa20x/fa-weisman/ and several reviews of her books:  “Discrimination by Design” https://www.jstor.org/stable/4316247, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030164, https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-16884-001, https://www.ontheissuesmagazine.com/2009winter/2009winter_3.php, and reviews of a different book, “The Sex of Architecture” https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13264829609478312?journalCode=ratr20. Just because an article is short or a stub is not a valid rationalle for deletion. There is a wealth of SIGCOV in RS's on her that supports her notability. The nomination was done without doing a proper  search
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per  and . She authored a widely reviewed book and edited another reviewed volume. I've added multiple scholarly reviews. She helped found notable academic programs (i.e. Women's School of Planning and Architecture) and has an entry on Encyclopedia.com that can be used to help expand this article. I recommend withdrawing this nomination and performing a more through  in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Doing a  search reveals a number of hits like https://suffolktimes.timesreview.com/2011/01/2010-public-servant-of-the-year-leslie-kanes-weisman/a full length feature in the Suffolk Times, https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-abstract/81/2/834/692699?redirectedFrom=fulltext a critique of one of her books in the ''Journal of American History'', https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-16884-001 a review of her book by the ''American Psychological Association''. There are other reviews and critiques as well. And a number of profiles with universities and feminist organizations. The smaller hits may only give her a nod or acknowledgement but put it with the media articles and bigger reviews, critiques and journal entries written about her work as an author and activist and it does pass  requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:N)

Comment: per , following the addition of many new sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: The  case is actually still a little weak despite the many reviews because there's only one authored book (and one co-edited volume) but I think there's enough coverage of her to avoid  for the book and to make a solid case for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG)