Deletion of Francesca Verones (2nd nomination)

Comment: Three publications with over 100 citations each make a borderline case for #C1, and the Laudise medal makes a borderline case for #C2 (borderline because although it is international and not a student award, it is aimed at younger researchers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I also agree this is likely a  case. Using citation counts is always a very weak metric for notability, though 2,000 citations in this field is decent for  an assistant prof. That said, GNG should rule the roost, and not something much more arbitrary like saying 2k citations is high or low. Those metrics should instead only be used show a researcher is an outlier and obviously justified for inclusion. In terms of GNG, I'm not seeing the independent secondary coverage that would lay out the case of notability or content to support it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per {{u|David Eppstein}}'s argument that there is a borderline case for two of the  criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think if it is borderline and the case cant be made and there is consensus that is probably  then it must be delete, if there is any doubt. I think it is a case of ''Force majeure''. I think she will be back, this time next year or later, but it needs to be under her own steam and notable enough to satisfy  with no doubt
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PROF)