Deletion of Bestial Warlust (2nd nomination)

Comment: in light of the preceding discussion's result and the additional source found then, it apparently satisfies  as one of the premier examples of its style. Unfortunately, one of the external links seems to have died, but I thing the All Music Guide's biography should serve to back the article's claims of grandeur
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: unless |reliable sources are found and added, as fails  in current state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: I agree that merely being listed on AMG is not an indicator of notability, but the article on there that describes them as a band of note within their subgenre means that this meets criteria #7 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Appears to meet  notability guidelines - being part of an underground scene which receives little or no mainstream attention doesn't actually disqualify it, and the book reference if not already in the article should be there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Despite having an All Music page, the band fail all the criteria for . AMG is a database for ''any'' band or album, it doesn't necessarily mean they're notable enough for a Wiki article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Don't meet the requirements of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)