Deletion of Sexual abuse scandal in Selwyn House School

Comment: as no sources connects all these miniscandals, whose notability is questionable to begin with, this would fall under . This is different from the abuse scandals in the the Boston archdiocese, where newspaper were indeed discussing a pattern of abuse and were connecting the individiual cases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: I think the '$5 million compensation' section gives reason to think these apparently separate scandals are all connected - the linked article refers to the teachers who are mentioned in the first two sections. I wouldn't object to a merge if the information is preserved, but I think there's enough here for a separate article without violating 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: without a source connecting these various incidents, lumping them together as one "coverup"/"pattern of activity" would appear to be a violation of  / . The use of "scandal" in the title also seems problematic with , although that is not reason to delete in and of itself. MM. Special:Contributions/207.69.137.39|207.69.137.39
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYN||WP:NPOV)