Deletion of Marcel Van Goolen

Comment: there doesn't seem to be an entity called the "Brabant Provincial Legislature", but there is a "Provincial Council of North Brabant", which the computer translation might be referring to.  The issue is what does the term (in my google translate) "successor" mean?  I'm not sure they ever served on the provincial council. Without a reference which shows that they did, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Based on the sources we have in front of us, he's not notable as a mayor - the problem with the "not about importance but coverage" argument is that there are some types of articles which get deleted in spite of the fact they receive coverage, basically on  grounds, and local politics is one of those areas. However, I ran one of the articles through Google Translate and it appears he was indeed in the Brabant Provincial Legislature in the 1980s. What that means in terms of , I'm not sure
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:NPOL)

Comment: Being mayor for 3 years of a town with 15,000 people doesn't come close to showing notability as a politician.  I don't see the coverage necessary to meet .  The coverage of his death is one event and only shows that he existed, neither of which is sufficient to show notability.  The last source mentioned by Jaysonsands is a funeral home and lacks the significant independent coverage required to help show notability.  All local politicians receive local coverage, but very few are WP notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If he had been elected to a federal or provincial body he would certainly be notable. For mayors the situation is less clear. Recent AfD outcomes for mayors have reinforced the consensus that most mayors are not notable; those in charge of major world cities are and others might be for one reason or another, but not just because they were a mayor. It is also presumed that all mayors and other elected office holders will get some press coverage, do interviews etc. But  makes clear that this isn’t enough to make them notable, otherwise more or less all elected local officials would be notable, which they aren’t
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Passes  as current news coverage such as https://www.rotselaar.be/voormalig-burgemeester-marcel-van-goolen-overledenhttps://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20210323_94942538https://www.hln.be/rotselaar/gewezen-burgemeester-marcel-van-goolen-75-overleden-een-politieke-teamspeler-maar-vooral-een-man-met-het-hart-op-de-juiste-plaats~a84bf28f/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2F&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fhttps://localnews.be/n/2021/03/gewezen-burgemeester-marcel-van-goolen-75-overleden-een-politieke-teamspeler-maar-vooral-een-man-met-het-hart-op-de-juiste-plaats/https://www.leuvenactueel.be/nieuws/rotselaar/rotselaar-neemt-afscheid-van-gewezen-burgemeester-marcel-van-goolenhttps://www.eraly.be/condoleren/marcel-van-goolen seems enough to qualify general notability guidelines. I also agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)