Deletion of Geibeltbad Pirna

Comment: Written like an ad" can be improved upon; "Original research"? Which part does this refer to, as I'm not seeing that. "Not citing references" can be sorted out with a bit of searching. For example, it is one of 21 examples used in "{{cite book|last=Castillo|first=Encarna|coauthors=Cañizares, Ana G. |no-tracking=true |title=Spa & health club design|publisher=teNeues|date=2005|series=Design focus|pages=44-51|isbn=9783832790745|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Kj4xEbZrHRMC&pg=PA44&dq=%22geibeltbad+pirna%22&cd=1#v=onepage&q=%22geibeltbad%20pirna%22&f=false|accessdate=4 January 2010}}" (although most of those pages are photos of the place, there is only a short paragraph of text&nbsp;— but the examples in the book are from around the world), plus a couple of other references at Google Books. I assume that your reference to  is about item 3 ''Excessive listing of statistics'': The statistics here are in the form of prose, and look ok, albeit needing a bit of tidying up. AfD is not for cleanup, which is what I feel that this article needs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT)

Comment: This does not read as a unrecoverable article. It needs some sources but it is factual and some of the overly detailed information (such as prices) can be easily trimmed. Copyright of prose may have been more of an issue if chunks are cut and paste from the original website. I suggest this is raised for urgent recovery at ikiProject Swimming
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)