Deletion of Lopadotemachoselachogaleokranioleipsanodrimhypotrimmatosilphiokarabomelitokatakechymenokichlepikossyphophattoperisteralektryonoptekephalliokigklopeleiolagoiosiraiobaphetraganopterygon

Comment: The rationale is bad, but I am not seeing sources that suggest the topic is |notable, outside of it being in the Guiness book of records. But most Guiness records don't need separata articles, just inclusion on some list. But considering the flood of speedy keeps above, this may be a trainwreck (depends on whether the discussion closer reads the arguments, because they are not particularly impressive either). I suggest this is speedy closed and renominated to discuss the subject's notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the more I thought about it the more it seems  and not even trivia that I can pronounce or use. This is the English encyclopedia - I remind myself. Clarityfiend probably has the most succinct rationale {{tq|Normally I would vote to redirect, but who would ever type this?}}. With roughly 4100 views since January I could be wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)