Deletion of Andrew D. Chumbley

Comment: I've read through the article, and discussion that OP linked. While I understand the OP concern about the depth of the references, it is possible to pass  with trivial or marginal depth in individual articles provided there is a significant quantity of them. Article's subject has enough low grade mentions in what op agreed is a peer-reviewed journal to pass this standard in my opinion. Argument about price of his books in resale market doesn't appear to be an exaggeration. (>$1000 for Qutub on ABE). This is indicative of someone whose notability may be lasting. Looking at past notable occultists, his volume of published work seems reasonable. He passes notability now, albeit barely, based on journal coverage and it appears his work will have a lasting impact in his field
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)