Deletion of Richard Tylman (3rd nomination)

Comment: as no significant coverage in third party Wp:RS|RS about subject's life and work; therefore lacking crucial requirement per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: Too little specific and detailed coverage of him for passing  and not enough to show notability under . The only individual award mentioned in the article is ''Grand Owl '' which seems to be a student level award. No significant published reviews of his work are mentioned in the article. I looked up the library holdings for some of his books in Worldcat and they appear to be rather minimalhttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48610293http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48610545http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/48610280.  Overall, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Tylman's team was given an Award of Excellence at Graphex (a competition sufficiently notable to merit a Wikipedia article). That would seem to satisfy .Also, Tylman was the subject of an article in ''Głos – Tygodnik Nowohucki''. He and his poem, "An Attempt at Blowing Up the Statue of Lenin", were brought up in several interviews with the author of ''Nowa Huta. Okruchy życia i meandry historii'', a photo anthology that includes the poem. (The authors of other texts in the anthology were ''not'' discussed.) Tylman may not be a slam-dunk case of notability, but I think the balance weighs in his favor. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: The article is well written and its subject is notable per sources. Please do not make attles and  s by nominating articles for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:POINT)

Comment: per nominator. Fails all five points of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: quite simply, if there is no significant coverage in independent sources we cannot write an article. The bulk of the article seems to be sourced to the subject of the article. The only source that is actually about the subject of the article is in Glos, hardly significant coverage, hardly enough to start an article. The obscurity of Glos makes it even difficult to assess whether this article satisfies . Evidently this individual is like millions of professionals who have received some minor prices, and might have been mentioned in obscure publications such as Glos - but that does not mean they are notable, because notability requires significant coverage. And significant coverage is necessary to write an article, because otherwise we have articles like these that are overwhelmingly sourced to the individual and not to independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)