Deletion of Dunk-a-roos

Comment: The above comments appear to be pasted across the numerous AfDs created from the DRV.  While I endorse the DRV's actions, this should be an idependent evaluation.  Now, unlike, say, Chips Ahoy!, for which I can find dozens of mentions of in news article litterred like candy, I cannot find the same for this.  The fact that the product was so short lived means its a blip of a product that failed, and we do not need an article on every single product produced by a company. Across history there's an untold number of different products and companies that have come and gone. What's special about it? It does not appear to have the multiple reliable sources for 's guideline for notability.  May be more appropriate for something more closely related to Betty Crocker, but that appears to be lacking too for much in the way of products in general.  There's no sources for the article really, and I can't substantiate it being a "major brand/product" because of that.  Actions by a highly noted company don't make it notable either. (Children of famous people don't get articles automatically).  The product should be able to stand on its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)