Deletion of I Am That: Talks with Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj

Comment: admin closing note: Even if the said Nisargadatta Maharaj is notable, is does not seem to be proper to keep a particular book by him as a separate article. Unless there are objections, the book section should be merged into the article itself or deleted. Notability of Nisargadatta Maharaj has nothing to do with the book, that was not even written by him and is just transcripts. There are thousands of books, by really notable people, do all of them need a separate article especially if it was never a subject to third party independent studies or even an academic review? |Obviously not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: because, just because. , and the encyclopedia is better with this article than without it, it is that simple. If the article contains unsourced claims, remove them. But most of the article is verifiable, rather simply. I see this article as a subarticle of Nisargadatta Maharaj, he is notable, and we should have more such, not less. Wikidas, please be devoted to the encyclopedia (which means the utility and pleasure it brings to its ''readers,'' in the end), not narrow interpretations of guidelines taken as rules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)