Deletion of Trumaker & Co.

Comment: WP:SIGCOV in ''Fast Company'', ''TechCrunch'', and ''Bloomberg'', all of which are , means it passes GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or yellow pages. References reflect the company's PR and Communications department. The https://www.fastcompany.com/3043102/clothes-make-the-man-but-the-web-makes-the-clothes Fast Company reference is based on information provided by the company and an interview with company execs, fails . https://web.archive.org/web/20160304043230/https://www.themuse.com/advice/the-fashion-and-technology-company-youll-want-to-be-part-of The Muse reference is the same - journalist is invited to the "office" and writes an article pumping the company, fails . None of the TechCrunch reference are anything more than paid articles expounding the wonderfulness of the company, none are significant and none contain Independent Content, fail . Topic fails /GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: The provided references are a mix of start-up proposition descriptions, overviews of this and other start-ups in the sector, and funding announcements. This is a firm going about its business, but my searches are not finding the level of |coverage required to demonstrate |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:NCORP)