Deletion of Cody Claver

Comment: Claver passes  easily and that is the end of the matter
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Maybe we need to have a conversation about how accommodating  is first, perhaps at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports)? You could probably purge a good number of articles based on the nominator's rationale alone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: passes  as others have pointed out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: does not meet ; significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is in passing and / or primary.  is, sadly, a discredited guideline, and in this case it's too far off the mark in meeting encyclopedia notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: For reasons mentioned above, namely that the player passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: meets  having played in a fully professional league
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: passes ; needs improving, not deleting. There are plenty of other sources out there - http://cambuur.nl/nieuws/rutger-etten-en-cody-claver-naar-tweede-divisie/ 1, https://www.hetamsterdamschevoetbal.nl/afc-trekt-voormalig-liverpool-talent-vincent-weijl-en-cody-claver-cambuur-aan/ 2 etc. (probably needs a Dutch speaker to find the useful ones) - but has nominator complied with ? Doubtful, especially given that they've got the number of games played wrong
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BEFORE)