Deletion of Abstract Gender (2nd nomination)

Comment: Some of the votes above just show the farcical gulf between the application of ,  and  to general websites and webcomics.  We delete other websites with no assertion of notability such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon-Safari.com|Pokemon-Safari, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final Fantasy Shrine|Final Fantasy Shrine, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopædia Dramatica (3rd nomination)|Encyclopedia Dramatica, each of them a hell of a lot more popular than Abstract Gender. How are you going to "improve" an encyclopedia article on an unencyclopedic nn subject, that reasoning is just a reiteration of "Keep - I like it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Hahnchen should be commended for presenting the issues at hand in a fair, well-reasoned manner. The discussion of other webcomic's current presence on WP is extraneous. The bottom line is that this needs to meet . And unless I'm missing something, it doesn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: This webcomic is minor- there are also no |reliable sources to WP:|verify it. How can you tell it's minor? For starters, on its home page, it has a big "DON'T FORGET TO VOTE FOR US!" at the top, which should be a dead giveaway. It has an unremarkable http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.abstractgender.com%2F&url=abstractgender.com Alexa ranking , and only http://www.google.ca/search?q=link:http://www.abstractgender.com&hl=en&hs=rnx&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&start=40&sa=N29 29 unique sites link to it, all of which are blogs, forums, or submission webcomic directories. Keeping under "the article needs improvement" is not a valid argument- it doesn't address the question of whether the article should even ''exist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I'd like to point out that KeenSpot comics are a different matter, since they seem to meet the third criteria of , which is "The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: clearly fails , , .  Subject already deleted by previous AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:RS)