Deletion of RadCon

Comment: I found another source other than the ones you mentioned: http://www.keprtv.com/news/local/15729347.html.  I personally think that this solidly meets .  The three articles here are written in detail about the topic, we now have two independent sources, and if you read the articles, you will find that the convention has been going for over 16 years.  It may not be interesting to everyone but I certainly think it is worth keeping and I certainly think it meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: article about notable genre-specific film festival. Send to  for further sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: due to the lack of coverage beyond the local press. I do not think local press alone can be relied on to be the basis of a |neutral, |verifiable |encyclopaedia article or establish a topics |notability per the |general notability guideline. Local press covers something because it happens locally, on a slow week (most weeks) almost anything can receive coverage. As they are generally supported and staffed by the local community they report on, I do not think they can be counted on to present the news in a neutral fashion and - whilst this is not the case across the board - their editorial standards often leave a lot to be desired
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:5P||WP:NN||WP:NN)