Deletion of William Robert Plumlee

Comment: it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . In my search for reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, all I could find was the ''Playboy'' article... and that was only in conjunction with an allegation he made. The rest of it is built from primary sources or from self-published conspiracy authors who take his claims of being a CIA pilot as fact. If someone else finds reliable source, please post them. Edit: Don't hold your breath on the Kerry Committee testimony. Like with every other assertion about this subject, the ''OC Weekly'' said his "testimony remains classified until 2020." Sure it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: Fails 's requirements for multiple, independent and reliable sources giving non-trivial coverage to the specific subject of the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as per Viriditas, Location, and Tom Harrison. Using cherry-picked primary and self-published documents to accuse anyone of  criminal activity is not acceptable practice, ever. (Note: by the time I viewed the article, the only citation left was the one from ''Playboy'', referenced above by Location. However, the history shows the FOIA requests and the external links to conspiracist and other dubious sites.) I doubt it would be possible to ever construct and article about this individual which complied with BLP, NPOV, and RS guidelines and policies, and although  is only an essay, this is a prime example of it, since it's not about the subject, it's about the others whose alleged dirty deeds he has abetted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)