Deletion of Zoombombing

Comment: The article includes sources which are not present (and should not be present) in the Zoom article.  All sourcing is from gold-plated  and include ''NRK'' (Norway), ''The New York Times'', ''The Washington Post'', and the ''Los Angeles Times'', among others.   Given the extremely high quality of the sources and the worldwide coverage, the article exceeds the .  It should be noted that stand-alone articles routinely include content and sources already present in abbreviated form in other articles, and then fully expand on it with additional facts and sources, as encyclopedically appropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: It is now a . Please witness https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=ALeKk004u92Yf_tIF7PW9mg2bqQn0ypXxQ%3A1585776378330&ei=-gaFXvzgE8Ks0PEP16OCgAY&q=%22zoombombing%22&oq=%22zoombombing%22&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIFCAAQgwEyBggAEAoQAzIGCAAQChADMgQIABADMgcIABAUEIcCMgQIABAKMgQIABAKMgQIABAKMgQIABAKMgUIABDNAjoECCMQJzoHCAAQgwEQClDQjgFYtZoBYL6gAWgBcAB4AIABcIgBggKSAQMyLjGYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwj8xeStlcjoAhVCFjQIHdeRAGAQ4dUDCAo&uact=5 "zoombombing" - Google Search & how many results it produces
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: and not merge - extensive sourcing in major  and has had a major effect on online education
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: yes, there are  discussing this phenomenon, but that's not the only requirement for whether something is notable and  of encyclopedic value. I very much feel  and  need to be heeded in cases like this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RECENT||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: per {{U|Rosiestep}}. There are now enough sources to  to justify a definite keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: with Zoom Video Communications per  and . Yes, it's well sourced, but it can be adequately covered in the main article, where it would also benefit from additional context about the software. We don't need a stand-alone article for a flash-in-the-pan meme
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:SUSTAINED)