Deletion of Jakob + MacFarlane

Comment: I wrote the stub and made sure it met  (I have no connection whatsoever with the firm) so I strongly disagree that it looks like an advertisement. I created the article because we had three articles about buildings that the firm had designed which seemed like a good start. Accordingly, there is coverage about these buildings' architecture. The firm has received notable awards and Jakob has won a notable prize herself. Add to that the coverage found by AllyD above and this is an easy keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The appropriate guideline is not  as that is only for professional persons and not companies. Rather, the appropriate guideline is  which states that the criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Also, |notability is not inherited so while some references may talk about the buildings architected by the firm, that does not automatically convey notability on the firm itself. Also, profiles on either Jakob or MacFarlane may provide a case that either or both of the architects are notable in their own right, but does not mean that the firm itself is notable. That leaves us with the award from Les Globes in 2007 where the firm won "Best Architect". I do not believe the awards themselves are notable and in my opinion this award doesn't push the firm over the line into notability on its own. What is required are sources that actually talk about the company and there doesn't appear to be any. There is more material to create articles individually for Jakob and MacFarlane that for this company. Since references fail the criteria for notability, topic is not notable, fails GNG/NCORP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE||WP:NCORP||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NOTINHERIT)

Comment: This architecture firm have designed significant public buildings :Cité de la mode et du design in Paris https://www.floornature.com/jakob-macfarlane-docks-en-seine-cite-de-la-mode-et-du-design-7865/, :Orange Cube in Lyon https://www.architectural-review.com/today/the-orange-cube-by-jakob-macfarlane-lyon-france/8614183.article, and a restaurant in the :Centre Pompidou https://www.architectural-review.com/buildings/restaurant-at-the-pompidou-centre-jakob-macfarlane-paris-france/8619749.article. They have also exhibited at the :Venice Biennale of Architecture in 2008 https://www.designboom.com/architecture/venice-architecture-biennale-08-jakob-macfarlane/ and designed an exhibition at the :Musée du quai Branly – Jacques Chirac in 2012 https://www.iconeye.com/opinion/review/item/9775-masters-of-chaos. They also have a work in the collections of the :Victoria and Albert Museum http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O1387879/architectural-print-from-the-boxed-prints-jakob-macfarlane/ (though this may be donation rather  than acquisition) and a retrospective at :de:Architekturforum Aedes https://www.designboom.com/architecture/jakob-macfarlane-augmenting-the-invisible-aedes-berlin-04-13-2017/. Add to that the awards listed in the article and I think there is enough for  #4 and   possibly also 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CREATIVE||:WP:CORPDEPTH)