Deletion of Natural Information Society

Comment: Passes criteria 1 of . Though it has been significantly edited since the opening of the nomination, I believe https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&oldid=820896843 a review of this version supports it as an article independent from Joshua Abrams on the basis of dedicated coverage by ''Rolling Stone'', ''The Guardian, Musicworks, Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork'', etc., with more incidental coverage in ''Spin (magazine)|Spin'', ''The Observer'', etc.The article also used to note a few other items that help establish suitability, but that have since been deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&diff=820897094&oldid=820897040 from the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&oldid=820897815 version live of this timestamp; for instance, it used to note that "''In 2017, the group was described by NPR as a "staple" of the underground music scene in Chicago''". In other cases, uncited information has been added https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&diff=820897040&oldid=820896843 seemingly for the purpose of tagging it "uncited" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&diff=820897815&oldid=820897605. In still other cases, sources that help establish notability like Time Inc.'s ''Uncut (magazine)|Uncut'' have been removed as "unreliable" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&diff=820899816&oldid=820899678. A "unreliable sources" tag was added to the top of the page with the edit summary {{xt|"many sources are unreliable"}} https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natural_Information_Society&diff=820902894&oldid=820902730; at the time the tag was added, the only sources used in the article were: ''Pitchfork (magazine)|Pitchfork, The Observer, The Guardian, Musicworks, Rolling Stone'', the University of Chicago, ''The Stranger (newspaper)|The Stranger'', and ''Spin (magazine)|Spin''. I would respectfully encourage editors, therefore, to review the earlier version of the article (linked above) before indicating their Keep/Delete preference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: There's easily enough coverage to meet , lots of which is already referenced by the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)