Deletion of Fredric Alan Maxwell

Comment: Marginally notable author of marginally notable book. Book Amazon sales rank: #1,721,799. Currently remaindered.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Tagged 's and likely SOCKS see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blevenberg
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: book may be notable; author doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: ping|FredTheBiped2}} Wikipedia has policies and guidelines on what is appropriate to include in the encyclopedia. For articles the most important thing to be done is establish |notability. For this we have out |general notability guidelines which in short require significant coverage of the subject in |independent, |reliable sources. There are also various specific notability guidelines which give additional, usually easier to meet, criteria to establish |notability. In this case those are the AUTHOR|specific notability criteria for authors. If an article subject meets out notability criteria an article can be kept but it is not required to be kept. If the subject does not meet those criteria than there may not be an article on that subject included in Wikipedia. We do not make any judgement about the subject's importance or contribution to society we only judge if there has been enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to allow us to write an informative and POV|neutral article.  If you wish to argue to keep the article you must state how the subject meets our notability criteria and how that information can be |verified by coverage in |independent, |reliable sources. No other arguments will have any positive influence on the outcome of this deletion discussion.  Since you have stated here that you are the subject of this article you should become familiar with out |conflict of interest policy. Also, please note that Wikipedia strongly discourages writing |autobiographies. Please read the material I have {{blue|blue linked}} above it goes into our policies and guidelines in detail. I realize that it looks like a lot of reading but attempting to write a Wikipedia article, particularly about yourself, is not likely to be a satisfying experience without understanding how Wikipedia works
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:COI||WP:AB)

Comment: Not enough coverage in |independent, |reliable sources to |verify or |sustian article. Fails |Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and . Subject appears to be adept at self promotion. Citing an article about oneself written by oneself no matter the publisher does not contribute to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NRV||WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR)