Deletion of Pink Therapy

Comment: Dominic Davies. Asserts some  notability ("first"/"pioneered"/"earliest example") even if in a relatively narrow category, but does not provide |citations to these assertions. Citing the points of notability would convert me to '''weak keep''' (weak due to narrow-sounding realm of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CITE)

Comment: Pink Therapy. Appears to cover three distinct meanings of the term, none of which assert . A list or association of notable people is just that, not automatically a notable list or association itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Pink Therapy as not asserting notability. Not so sure about Davies himself, he seems to have at least some minimal notability as a published author (by a real publisher, not vanity press), he's http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:P-ppVKA-bMQJ:www.counselling.co.uk/conference2006/brochure_low.pdf+%22Dominic+Davies%22+pink+therapy&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=54 given a seminar at the British Association for Counselling AGM and I found http://www.fyne.co.uk/index.php?item=265 a magazine article quoting him. '''Weak delete''' because although the sources ''suggest'' the possibility of notability, they do not prove it, and because of the suspicions of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)