Deletion of Conversion Hub (2nd nomination)

Comment: I believe the article is more than credible. I feel like I'm repeating myself here, but three articles as mentioned above by the IP user are all credible PRINTED media articles. The fact one of them has a deadlink doesn't matter. This in my opinion meets . Secondly, the additional references are in accordance with . I don't fell that any of the points made in these references make the subject sound like something its not. The key points that are covered are about the size of the organisation and who they work with. Both these points are covered in the 3 printed media references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SELFSOURCE)

Comment: most of the current sources are from the company - either from the company's site or press releases - and I'm not convinced what is left is enough to meet . Happy to consider potential sources but the deadlinks don't inspire confidence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)