Deletion of List of American higher education institutions with open Title IX sexual violence investigations

Comment: There is a notable concept here and information here worth keeping, but my intuition is that the information worth keeping does not match the current title of the article. One option is to rename the article "Title IX sexual violence investigations", another could be "2014 List of American higher education institutions with open Title IX sexual violence investigations" so that the article can close itself just reporting the state at a point in time without having a changing list with different sourcing standards for different parts of it. I do not want the list adapted for prose format because there is no utility in making prose where the original sources being cited used a list. The news sources cited on this topic are reliable sources and this list meets . The further commentary in the ''Chronicle of Higher Education'' strengthens that GNG argument by presenting a perspective from a different investigative perspective than a newspaper typically would. If this article remains unchanged it at least meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. I am not persuaded by arguments that this article is of no utility for describing past investigations or future investigations of the same nature; reliable sources have covered this list as an artifact of the time, and this article can stand just for this list and just at this time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I agree with Yaksar (and others above) that we shouldn't have a list article of ongoing investigations—it feels like ecentism|recentism. However, as Yaksar said, the publication of the list has received a lot of coverage, so an article about that is appropriate. I suggest renaming the article to a title that makes clear that it is intended to be an ''article'', not a list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: I agree with the nominator on this one. I don't believe that this news is significant. I don't believe this passes  nor . If you get enough sources, I will change my opinion on this article, but for now, I'm voting to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:DIVERSE)