Deletion of Cuba under Fidel Castro

Comment: per Midnightblueowl. The two are rather separate topics and while the coverage is largely duplicated, they can easily and eventually be expanded in different directions to greatly improve our coverage. Essentially, it seems like a  and a promising one at that. If they overlap too much for your liking, that's a reason to improve the article, not delete it, especially since the ''potential'' for the articles is significantly different. I don't see any real reason to delete, and a pretty good reason to keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: Forgive me in engaging in a little , but it is perfectly standard practice on Wikipedia to have articles such as this one. For instance, we have both Government of Vladimir Lenin and Vladimir Lenin, and Presidency of Barack Obama and Barack Obama. At present it may be that the Fidel Castro and Cuba under Fidel Castro articles largely duplicate, but there is much potential for the latter to be expanded, while the former may indeed get trimmed back as it undergoes PR and eventually FAC in the coming months and years. Retaining both therefore carries great value
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)