Deletion of Inchrosil

Comment: as non-notable, promotional, original research.  This novel technology claims to be ''inorganic DNA based on silicon'' which I think is nonsense (at best ): it certainly is not supported by independent reliable sources.  It was supposedly invented in 2006 and as of this morning the only independent references were published in 1974.  The references added later today are all generic citations for the terms used in the article such as "chemistry" and "chromosome" and appear to have nothing to do with this subject -- indeed most of them also predate the alleged invention.  There are no independent references to this topic in Google Scholar or Google Books.  The article has been entirely created by {{user|3ln}} who has edited no other article and whose username is somewhat reminiscent of the name of the company that makes the device, threellop
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: per . Their http://www.threellop.com/data/white_paper.pdf whitepaper spends 2 pages discussing what type of lab coats they like to wear
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: That the article has severe COI and self-promotion troubles is obvious. However I'm not sure of the reason given for deletion. My question is: Has anybody looked at the references -the Spanish, first 11 ones? What do we know about their coverage? They could be well enough to pass , but it's hard to tell without looking them. (Also -incidentally- being a fringe theory is not reason for deletion: notable fringe theories are still notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)