Deletion of Vanja Bulić

Comment: What a failure of . I'm not interested in expanding the article, but the man has https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Vanja+Buli%C4%87%22+site%3Arts.rs&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb 80 hits only on the website of the national TV; https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Vanja+Buli%C4%87%22+site%3Ablic.rs&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb 417 in one major newspaper Blic, and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Vanja+Buli%C4%87%22+site%3Apolitika.rs&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb 94 in another Politika; take away 50% on Google's miscounting, and that's still plenty. Wikipedia is global English-language encyclopedia, not encyclopedia of English-speaking world, and  and  do not require that notability and sources must be in English
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Someone who's occupied these positions is definitely going to get substantial coverage in major sources, and when you're prominent in the 1990s in Eastern Europe, that coverage is going to be overwhelmingly in non-English print sources.  The  page is somewhat relevant; in this situation, we can't judge notability purely on the lack of reliable English-language sources available through Google
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS)

Comment: to Pretty Village, Pretty Flame. This movie looks to be the writer's most known work, not notable enough for a stand alone article though per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERITED)