Deletion of Nicholas Beale (4th nomination)

Comment: This should be deleted as a #G4|recreation of deleted content. There is nothing new in this version that would negate the opinion of those who commented at the previous discussion. An appropriate course of action would be for Nbeale to go to |deletion review
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:DRV)

Comment: It is clear that the subject is a good person with some supporters who want to place an article here. However, there are no |secondary sources that indicate notability and the requirements of  are not met. There are many people who have written a few minor books and articles, and who belong to various organizations. That's why we have |notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY||WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: this article about a non-notable individual. Also a lack |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)