Deletion of What do you call a male/female Dragon?

Comment: as apparent |unsourced |original research. If there were terms for male and female dragons, the appropriate place to mention them would be in the Dragon article, just like terms such as "stallion" and "mare" are mentioned in Horse#Age|Horse and "bull" and "cow" are mentioned in Cattle#Terminology|Cattle. The article says that after reading many books about dragons, still no real name was found for what we call male/female dragons. So if the terms used in this article didn't come from a book, they are probably original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR)

Comment: classic example of  at its most naive and useless
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (:WP:MADEUP)

Comment: This article fails , and obviously was |made up by someone, somewhere in one day. It doesn't matter whether what do you call a male or female dragon, but rather, how this this is encyclopedic. An essay written by one person in one sure doesn't seem to be notable. Even dragons would think this article isn't encyclopedic. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a  collection of essays
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NFT)