Deletion of Enrique Marquez (accomplice)

Comment: I find the statements that coverage of the marriage issue take this outside of  unconvincing. That is something that is known about him, but it's not what he's known for; that coverage all seems to be in the context of "here's something we know about the guy who is supposed to have supplied the guns". If we had articles revealing he went to Bart Simpson High School, would we say that he was "known for" that and that qualifies him going beyong 1E, or is that just giving us a piece of information on this coverage? People being charged with green card marriages are not something that generally generate much of any attention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to 2015 San Bernardino attack per nom. Restating : "For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime '''unless a conviction is secured'''" (emphasis added). He has not been convicted, he's barely been arrested. All that the volume of coverage warrants is the ''briefest'' of mentions in the main article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: to 2015 San Bernardino attack#Enrique Marquez. He "is known only in connection with a criminal event"; so  is exactly on point. Notice that this guideline was followed in the case of Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik It would be particularly strange if it were ignored in the case of Marquez, whose alleged involvement in the attack was rather peripheral
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIMINAL)

Comment: to 2015 San Bernardino attack because |one event alone does not sufficiently make an article about that person
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: and |userfy. This gives almost as much info but doesn't have a pejorative title and at this stage in the investigations we have no idea if this will meet  guidelines, or if it is a person of interest who will be exonerated next week
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY||WP:NOTABILITY)