Deletion of Rose Anne McGreevy

Comment: Unfortunately at the moment none of the four sources satisfy the |General Notability Guidelines. Certainly no independent secondary sources that discuss the subject in detail. We need two of these. Am happy to change to keep if two can be found. (If they are found feel free to ping me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article may not be filled with content or many sources (yet), but sources showing notability look to be widely available. A simple search (see https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Rose+Anne+McGreevy%22 here) reveals that she's referenced in many books. Notability is not dependent upon an article saying "It's notable because..." or by a lack of an article's references to sources proving notability. Notability is dependent upon sources being ''available'' (see ). —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE)

Comment: The references that folks have found suggest that this person makes it past the |notability threshold. I just don't don't buy the obituary litmus test for the reasons that {{u|DGG}} raised: (a) obituaries may in fact be forthcoming in non-newspapers and (b) OTABILITY simply doesn't mean that you need obituaries written about you! Obituary or not, the fact the subject has died means that some of the concerns with s in general no longer apply here the normal risks and cautiousness we take in those cases can be relaxed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:BLP)

Comment: Article doesn't make any claims of notability - probably should have been tagged as |A7 rather than AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7)

Comment: The subject fails . There are no significant awards, notable works, innovative techniques or anything else associated with notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)