Deletion of Romania–Uzbekistan relations

Comment: has non-trivial references, see 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails --I could not find non-trivial coverage of this topic in independent secondary sources. Consensus at previous AfDs is that the mere existence of diplomatic relations does not constitute notability. See, for example rticles for deletion/Laos-Romania relations|this, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Canada–Moldova_relations|this, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bilateral_relations_of_Ireland|this, rticles for deletion/Chile-Colombia relations|this, rticles for deletion/Albanian-Moldovan relations|this, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:A||WP:A||WP:A)

Comment: Yet another one of these Country 1-Country 2 relations articles. No notable relations to speak of here, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Appears to meet  standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom. Notability isn't inherited from brief visits from senior politicians or generated by small numbers of immigrants. In-depth sourcing is needed to meet , and that's not the case here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: notability established |the usual way.  No arguments presented for deletion that don't rely upon demonstratably false premises
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)