Deletion of Home and Away merchandise

Comment: as all IMHO is pretty much !, Sources are pretty crap, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: does not meet . All the references cited are just to seller, publisher, library and other sites that prove the merchandise exists, none of them are useable for notability.  The argument about ''Neighbours'' and ''EastEnders'' is just a case of , I could ask the same about a Beatles or Elvis Presley|The King merchandise article or the thousands of other popular media 'things' that have spawned 'spinoffs' or 'merchandise/memorabilia/collectables'.  In fact, I can feel a Merchandise wikiproject coming on, think about all those articles we can create, "May the Schwartz be with you!"(apologies to Mel Brooks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WHATABOUTX)

Comment: My original comment above in support of keeping the article was on the assumption that the contents would be reproduced in the main article on the show if the separate list article was deleted. However, after giving further thought to ancruft and istcruft, the two paragraphs in Home and Away#Merchandise and spin-offs give sufficient coverage of this topic and any attempt to put the lists into the main article can also be avoided
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Non-free content (WP:F||WP:L)

Comment: Massive collection of references, but as far as I can tell, not a single one meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)