Deletion of Nandini Sahu

Comment: Google Books (3 of the sources) cannot and does not have an editorial board due to its inherent nature. The source from the Times of India is inconsistent with the information from this article (from a different area and studies the sciences) and most likely about a different person, "Nandini, a native of a village in Akbarpur in Kanpur Dehat has also been a student of Navodaya Vidyalaya in Faizabad ... She gives credit of her success to teachers of Navodaya Vidyalaya who taught her the basics of science to crack JEE."{{cite web|title=Times of India|url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-05-21/kanpur/31800010_1_gail-utkarsh-navodaya-vidyalayas-jnv}} The reliability of merinews.com is questionable as previously mentioned (I was able to find multiple grammatical errors throughout the site). Another source is directly from the University she works at. The Syndic Journal is written, compiled, and maintained by only one person. The only source I could find on the article which comes close to establishing notability is All About Book Publishing (which is still pushing it considering the amount of weasel words). As such, in my judgement it does not pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: sorry, you are compeletely wrong, subject well estabilhes the .I think you did not properly search the sources. Please it is better you reverse your proposed deletion request. Here are  as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:notability||WP:reliable sources)

Comment: No significant coverage, all the single para sources are from book publishers and fairs. Merinews is not a reliable source, the ToI article mentions a different person by the same name, and online links to books are obviously not sufficient. In the absence of passing either  or  this ought to be deleted. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG)