Deletion of Matse Uwatse

Comment: ping|Darreg}} You get very emotional when responding to others. You need to stop making comments about AFD participants. Please comment on content, not on the contributor. Some of the comments you made above are conflicting to say the least. If you do not care about the outcome of this AFD discussion, why participate in it? You are overreacting Darreg.  supports the notion that articles on Wikipedia can be nominated for deletion at any point in time. AFD exists in order for the community to derive consensus about the notability of a topic. I disagree with your point about Wikipedia faking "a concern that women and African topics are lacking in coverage." The fact of the matter is that Wikipedia welcomes contributions from everyone. If this wasn't the case, newcomers wouldn't be able to create a page by simply adding double brackets around the page's title. If Wikipedia was more stringent, new articles would only be created via AFC. One being a popular OAP doesn't mean that they deserve to have stand-alone articles written about them. I just want you to keep this in mind
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: There is some minor coverage.  From the current sources in the article there are several paragraphs about her.  The rest are interviews with her non-independent comments about herself or brief mentions.  There are some notable awards listed although I'm not certain if any would be considered 'well known'.  Most are unsourced claims.  Of the four sources listed by Darreg one is a dead link for me (takes me to http://ww8.http.com/) and the others are again interviews of the subject which are not helpful to notability.  Fails. Happy to reconsider if better sources surface
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Per  reads like a resumé, very promotional without any sort of major claim of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)