Deletion of Arthur Carmazzi

Comment: Possibly even speedily per #A7
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: Non-notable. Explicitly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: You have logged in and out of the Carmaz account while commenting on this AfD, revealing your ISP, and as I proved above, it is the same one that appeared in the Carmazzi spam report.  We are not talking about the posting of a youtube video--we are talking about spamming links to your company within many different Wikipedia articles, such as Organizational culture, Organization development, Leadership, Leadership development, Transformational leadership, Industrial and organizational psychology, Customer service, and Motivational speaker.  I spent an hour the other day deleting your spam from WP articles, and that doesn't include the time that other editors have spent deleting your spam from even more articles.  The fact is that you are editing from an account that is guilty of .  Also, by commenting here in defense of your self-promotional articles and spamming activities, you are in violation of .  By using two different WP:single-purpose accounts to break these policies, you are in violation of .  So far, I count four different reasons for an admin to block you.  I don't like to file incident reports on newbies, but you've been abusing Wikipedia for a long, long time now and this has to stop right now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:COI||WP:SOCK)