Deletion of Violet Song jat Shariff

Comment: As the nominator said, the character is not significant outside of the film, plus half the page is just restating the plot of UltraViolet and the rest of the page could be integrated into the film's article. However, since the name of the protagonist is a likely search term, the page should redirect to UltraViolet (film). I see "independent notability" is |challenged above, but the film does not necessarily confer any notability to the individual, even the protagonist, and thus they don't always deserve their own Wikipedia article. This is similar to articles created for every single episode of a TV series: each episode moves the plot along, but by no means are each of them notable. If the character was analysed or appropriated in other works, they might warrant their own article, but I don't see why this stub should be isolated from the texts that establish her as a character
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: I think there is enough info to identify the character's role in the movie. Next time when you nominate AfDs, don't say 'the character does not assert notabliity independent of its film/game/etc.' Characters are not made to leap out into the real world and get famous with us - they are there to make the plot move. Sounds to me as a really lame AfD nom and a |hopeless, bad-faith one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)