Deletion of Festivalism

Comment: Appears to be a eologism or  as I can find nothing mentioning this term in detail that wasn't written by, or connected to, David Boje
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OR)

Comment: Please don't feel silly, Ron Ritzman.  Though this may be a noble concept, it is also, unfortunately, a |neologism and |original reasearch which lacks |reliable, independent sources that discuss the topic in depth.  The references offered are controlled by the person who coined the term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:OR||WP:RS)

Comment: per everyone above and per . From this experience I have learned that I don't have the same kind of "radar|cruftdar" as many other editors do. To me this just looked like another article on another nutball philosophy. However, when I pointed this out on IRC, 3 other admins instantly knew that the article needed to go. Therefore, I guess "huh?" is as good a rationale as any to those for which such things are instinctual. At least NW has demonstrated that a descriptive deletion rationale is possible, even for such an obvious case as this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)