Deletion of World Golf Index

Comment: for a myriad of reasons, , propritary informaton which is designed to be paid for, a lack of http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=%22world+golf+index%22&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 G-hits (only 22) which are only augmented by only COI-packed press releases, and the fact that this is impossible to compare since women and men are mixed into the same chart when they rarely play in the same tournament
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Please, be |civil. The use of the term proprietary within my nomination was to say that this was information you compiled and indexed on your own into a formula you want to be common in your field. If you're not intending to sell the information, I apologize, and there was no attempt to attack you at all. I am just basing my nomination on a lack of this index being commonly distributed within the field and the search results which fail to go beyond what is required to meet notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)