Deletion of UK telephone code misconceptions

Comment: useful, verifiable and notable content to Big Number Change and '''Delete''' remainder. WP is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The article seems to be something of a content fork. Most of it is horribly unencyclopedic, built on original research and synthesis and supported by references to unacceptable sources such as directories and forums. The mainstream sourcing that there is is almost all from the same short period a fairly long time ago - a sign the article may violate  From : ''A complete exposition of all possible details. Rather, an article is a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.'' This article seems to be merely an attempt to be "a complete exposition of all possible details" regarding the Big Number Change. This is really not a sensible subject for an encyclopedia article at all
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOT)

Comment: Do any of the cited references describe this as an issue as defined by the scope of the article or is they entirely a synthesized collection of materials describing the various aspects of the misconceptions as seen by the editors? I can't find any cites that actually address this as a single issue. If there are none than this is clearly  issue, if there are then the article does not fit the #REASON|criteria for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:DEL)