Deletion of Gökhan Töre

Comment: per established consensus (see plenty of similar AFDs around) and  - being signed to a fully professional club is not enough, he ''must'' play a competitive first team game in order to be deemed notable. Claims like "he is a bright prospect for the future" or "he is going to play in the near future" are obvious violations of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: currently he is non-notable, signing for a big club doesn't change that, and saying he will play for them in the future is pure |crystal-ballery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Fails thlete. He may be a sportsman but it is rather obvious that he is not a ''notable'' sportsman
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: As stated, it meets , but not . If the article were to go more in depth, more information on his notability, then keep, if not then delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATH)

Comment: I've had a go at adding some sources to the article to help it pass . The subject however does fail  and it is hard to defend the inclusion of a 17 year old who plays in the Chelsea youth team. Not particularly notable even with the  that have been included, so delete I'm afraid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:ATHLETE||WP:RS)

Comment: He fails , we can't just pick athletes and say that because they are at a good club, they are automatically notable. If he never plays for the first team at Chelsea, he might be proud that he got there, but there is no need to say he is notable across the world. —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: vaguely worded journalistic claims about how he is "going to play for Chelsea" notwithstanding, he has not played, so he fails .  Some editors are unhappy enough about the number of WP articles on footballers, so we certainly don't need to increase that number even further by adding kids who've never played a pro match.  And, to be honest, it is extremely unlikely he will play at all this season unless the club has some sort of massive injury crisis.  As pointed out above, Chelsea may be one of the top clubs in the world, but merely being on their books is not a claim to notability.  Judging from http://www.chelseafc.com/page/TheAcademy/0,,10268~898867,00.html this, Chelsea have played as young as 9 on their books, and we obviously aren't going to have articles on them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Article fails  and also appears to fail . The article is sourced, but even the Sky Sports article is trivial coverage which doesn't appear to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:N)