Deletion of EdgeWave

Comment: Lots of press releases and info from the company website that fails . I would usually consider ''U-T San Diego'' (the erstwhile ''Union-Tribune'') an acceptable source, but in this case even its first two and last paragraphs are lifted straight from a company press release. The 1999 ''Windows IT Pro'' article appears independent, but says almost nothing about the company (or predecessor as it was then). The brief merger announcement in ''Infosecurity Magazine'' also fails . All in all, does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORP)

Comment: Wikipedia:Significant coverage, and in fact the rest of the guideline, is a good read. In general number does not matter as much as the quality and depth of how the sources go. Specifically simply press releases (that is mostly reposted as-is) and routinal reportage (like board member or personnel changes) almost never count to notability. According to my own search, the subject's collaboration with Huawei http://www.fierceenterprisecommunications.com/story/huawei-edgewave-team-combat-cybersecurity-threats/2015-04-22 might suggest a slightly better potential than the thousands we turn away via speedy delete, but is still lacking in very compelling evidence of importance to solidly keep. PS. If you are working for the company you have an inherent |conflict of interest where there are more things to be aware of. '''野狼院ひさし
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)