Deletion of Abhas Mitra (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article is well-cited and easily meets .  Whether or not the article topic is  is irrelevant to this discussion.  All that matters is that the article's topic has received significant coverage in third-party |reliable sources which it does
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLPFRINGE||WP:RS)

Comment: There are enough sources to satisfy . The argument about  is odd given that it specifically stated that someone holding fringe view can be notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FRINGEBLP)

Comment: 1080 cites on Google scholar is not enough to satisfy rof in this highly cited field. Trivial self-publicity in the popular media is not enough to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:GNG)

Comment: As stated above, his citations are almost entirely self-citations, his work is ignored by everyone else and very , and he has definitely abused wikipedia for self promotion in the past
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: per nom. The criteria for  states that notability isn't what the subject writes but what reliable sources write about the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)