Deletion of List of interracial romance films (2nd nomination)

Comment: The depiction of interracial relationships in film is a legitimate encylopedic topic with many famous examples, and substantial RS coverage: http://books.google.com/books?id=hCYRxuw5Q1YC&pg=PA184, http://books.google.com/books?id=irbxyKFaQaIC&pg=PA39, http://books.google.com/books?id=P9QDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA73, http://books.google.com/books?id=Ng2tAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA339, http://books.google.com/books?id=WTsDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA32, http://books.google.com/books?id=5dmCIR40tywC&pg=PA144. Ill-defined inclusion criteria should not be a reason for deleting the list. Obviously films where the characters' races are incidental should not be included, so I suggest limiting the list to entries where relaible sources mention the films within the context of interracial romance to avoid the list becoming 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: as a notable list topic per  as evidenced by {{ul|Andrew Davidson|Andrew}}. A quick Google search also revealed http://news.moviefone.com/2010/03/12/most-compelling-interracial-romances/ this, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/twanna-a-hines/top-10-movies-with-steamy_b_162432.html this, http://unrealitymag.com/movies/10-movies-featuring-interracial-relationships-that-are-worth-a-watch/ this, http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/genres-movies/drama/10-best-interracial-romance-movies/ this, and http://www.alternet.org/story/154829/11_interracial_romances_that_changed_america this. The condition of the article is irrelevant to the topic's notability, and we can use secondary sources to determine if a film meets the interracial romance criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL)