Deletion of Dance in the Dark

Comment: As above, notable article with no violation of , stupid nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: has demonstrated notability per both  and the . However, I don't see how the information here can't be contained in the The Fame Monster, The Monster Ball Tour, and Lady Gaga discography articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:GNG)

Comment: There is absolutely no reason for this to be even discussed, complies with . It is a charted song with cover and has charted in two countries. I would say delete if it wasnt so well written and sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: The nomination statement is fundamentally flawed. 1) As a charting song with significant coverage from secondary |reliable sources, this song isn't anything near irrelevant. 2) A song does not have to be a single in order to merit in article, as this article clearly demonstrates. 3) The song's composition is a ''core'' aspect of articles about songs need. In fact, it wouldn't pass a |good article nomination without it. 4) The article does not read non-neutral or promotional, as suggested by the nominator; even if it did, copy-editing would be the route to take, not nominating the entire article for deletion. This article meets and surpasses the requirements noted in the |notability guideline for songs and should not be deleted ''or'' merged
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GAN||WP:NSONGS)

Comment: per , charted single
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: Why? Have |Reliable Sources, currently |Good Article and t:tdyk|Did You Know? nominee. There's no reason for delete this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GAN)