Deletion of Game Six of the 2011 World Series

Comment: It appears to me that the nominator's interpretation of  is incorrect. Except for the last sentence, that section of  is defining events that are considered "inherently notable"—that is, events for which the presumption is that an article should exist. The last sentence says that regular season games "are not inherently notable"—that is, the presumption is that there should not be an article. This game is neither the final series nor a regular season game. Since this game doesn't appear to fit the criteria for either being "inherently notable," or "not inherently notable," it appears that the decision needs to be based on other criteria, such as . The game received substantial coverage from reliable sources, nationally and internationally, so I believe that it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:ATH||WP:GNG)

Comment: to 2011 World Series any sourced content that is appropriate.  Leave this article as a redirect to preserve attribution per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGE)

Comment: and merge content into 2011 World Series as appropriate. The 2011 World Series is notable, but per , Game 6 is insufficiently notable to warrant a stand-alone article. (I do agree that it was a great game, but that's not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: I respectfully refute the notion that Game 6 of the 2011 World Series is, "not notable independent of the 2011 World Series". Under the guideline of "Individual games or series" on , bullet point four states, "A game that is widely considered by independent reliable sources to be notable, outside routine coverage of each game, especially if the game received front page coverage outside of the local areas involved (e.g. Pacers-Pistons brawl or the Blood in the Water match). I offer these independent reliable sources as evidence of it's notability: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=wojciechowski_gene&page=wojciechowski-111027&sportCat=mlb, http://content.usatoday.com/communities/dailypitch/post/2011/10/greatest-world-series-games/1#.T2p9y9WqF9s, http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/nationals/2011-world-series-game-6-st-louis-cardinals-beat-texas-rangers-force-game-7-on-david-freese-homer-in-11th/2011/10/27/gIQAisAAOM_story.html, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/baseball/15497285. Link one was written by national sports writer Gene Wojciechowski, who has worked for ESPN since 1992. On link #2, Paul White, a writer for national USA Today, outlines the individual moments of Game 6 that make it a contender for "greatest Series game ever". The third link from the Washington Post includes quotes from the game's participants themselves, solidifying the extraordinary nature of Game 6, including a quote from player Daniel Descalso saying, "That’s gotta be one for the record books". The fourth link shows that even the BBC took note of the game
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)