Deletion of Cooks Source

Comment: Company/magazine has no notability beyond the incident, which is already covered in an article of its own. Although  does not seem to me to explicitly apply to companies, there is no reason we can't use the same principle in considering whether a company is truly notable. The magazine seems to have received only trivial coverage, incidental to the coverage of the plagiarism controversy
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I don't see anything beyond normal company reporting (history, scope, activities), none of which are third-party-noted ''except in relation to the plagiarism controversy''. An obituary might contain an independently-sourced and -written full life story of a person, but it alone is little more than that the person existed and did things, not direct notability, and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)