Deletion of List of companies with spelling mistakes in their names

Comment: A page containing a list of "misspelled" names without any authority defining "misspelling" is riginal research pretty much by definition.  A page called List of companies with spelling mistakes according to XYZ where XYZ is a recognized authority on such things '''and''' - and this is key - such a list is itself notable - would be okay, but the article would have to be ''about'' the list, not the list itself.  Having "the list itself" as a list-article ''might'' be okay if ''being on the list'' was somehow encyclopedic.  For example, we have lists of sports teams that have won XYZ championships or who play for XYZ leagues, because such information is encyclopedic.  Since we aren't talking about any particular XYZ spelling-authority, it's premature to say whether I would approve of a list of companies that this authority would consider having a "misspelled name."  Come to think of it, I can't think of any recognized authority that has rules of what is and is not "correct spelling" in a proper name in the English Language, at least not one that is recognized in the United States
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: Too subjective.  There is no central authority on English spelling, and  requires that this concept itself be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)