Deletion of Emis Killa

Comment: per patent lack of . Article already has a RS (from Italian magazine  ''TV Sorrisi e Canzoni''), the relevant article on Italian Wikipedia shows more (such as ''Panorama (Italian magazine)|Panorama''), a minimal search on Google reveals a lot more (''http://tv.wired.it/entertainment/2012/01/20/emis-killa-video-anteprima-backstage-rap-youtube-online.html Wired'', ''http://www.rollingstonemagazine.it/musica/notizie/emis-killa-un-pitbull-pronto-ad-azzannare/47895 Rolling Stone'', ''http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2012/06/29/il-successo-del-rap-va-dritto-al.html?ref=search La Repubblica'', ''http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2012/aprile/25/Emis_Killa_rap_che_viene_vm_0_120425009.shtml Il Corriere della Sera'', ''http://www.tgcom24.mediaset.it/spettacolo/articoli/1051161/killa-ecco-mio-rap-per-lemilia.shtml TGCom'', http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2012/04/29/hip-hop-party.html?ref=search again ''La Repubblica''), ''http://www.ilcittadinomb.it/stories/Cronaca/219944_emis_killa_rap_made_in_vimercate_contratto_con_carosello_records/ Il Cittadino
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: but because of notability, not because of lack of . The sources provided by Cavarrone do show notability, but the onus to provide evidence of notability rests on those wishing to add or keep content. (See Wikipedia:Verifiability.)  says that one should "take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources", but I have frequently taken significant efforts to find such evidence and yet missed evidence which someone else found very quickly, because they happened to look at different links than I did. We should assume that the nominator took reasonable steps in good faith unless there is evidence to the contrary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BEFORE)