Deletion of François Roche

Comment: I'm not sure how to proceed with this, but, the subject is notable. They pass . Their work is held in the collection of SFMOMAhttps://www.sfmoma.org/artist/Fran%C3%A7ois_Roche/ and their work under their moniker "New-Territories (R&Sie(n) / eIf/bʌt/c)" has been exhibited at Pompidou, Tate Modern, Barbican, and the Venice Biennial.https://www.arch2o.com/interview-way-francois-roche/ Their work has been profiled in the ''New York Times''https://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/13/francois-roche-pierre-huyghes-train-to-nowhere/, ''ARTFORUM''https://www.artforum.com/print/199603/francois-roche-33216, ''Icon (architecture magazine)|Icon''https://www.iconeye.com/architecture/features/profile-francois-roche-and-r-sie-n, and this https://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/12527215.0001.001 book edited by Etienne Turpin. They have had work published in ''Log (magazine)|Log''https://www.jstor.org/stable/41765354. They are the subject of a bookhttps://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/francois-roche-heretical-machinism-and-living-architecture-of-new-territoriescom(5ce3310b-81e7-466d-801b-5cdad3d95a54).html. Despite the treatment of the suspected sock, who I believe may be the assistant to the architect, the subject is notable and merits inclusion in Wikipedia - just not in its current condition article wise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)