Deletion of Saddam Hussein – United States relations

Comment: a merge tag was on this article for almost a year, and nothing happened despite a promise by an interested party that material will be transfered. In any case most of the information is already in the Iraq – United States relations and the Saddam Hussein article, so nothing is lost apart from the more egregious violations of  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NPOV)

Comment: This is as true a violation of  as I've ever seen-- basically, a retelling of the events described in the Saddam Hussein article, but from America's point of view.  No matter how neutral a tone the article is written in, every step of the way on the story of Saddam, the question "What did that mean to the United States?" is asked and answered.  I'm reluctant to say delete on a copiously researched article, and someone has put a lot of work into this.  On the other hand, I think much of it could be merged into Saddam Hussein in a shortened form.  I would say the same for "Fidel Castro - USSR relations" or "Adolf Hitler - Great Britain relations" or "Saddam Hussein - Iran relations".  All of history's stories could be retold from another point of view, but that doesn't mean that we should have another article from a different perspective
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: to Iraq-United States relations. Some of the content also belongs in Saddam Hussain. reserve the referenced content
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)