Deletion of Kinetic architecture

Comment: important engineering topic, and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Click on Google news archive search, and it shows that this is in fact a real thing.  All forms of architecture are notable and should have their own articles, by the Wikipedia policy of |common sense.  I'll post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture and ask their opinions on this. Someone already has.  Someone with knowledge of architecture should look into what should be in the article of course
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means (WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: The topic is extensively covered in numerous books.  The rest is a matter of ordinary editing per our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)