Deletion of WOW Hits

Comment: and '''boggle''' at this opposition. These are clearly all notable albums in their own, all having notable artists and songs on them, clearly passing . Most if not all albums have been on the billboard charts. If there are  issues, then deal with those separately. '''AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:A)

Comment: if lack of sources is the problem, the solution is to source them. As per Patstuart's comments, they meet notability by having charted. usic#Albums makes no specifications about compilation albums. The artists on these are still notable, which satisfies the album requirement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)

Comment: Violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: all per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: It's important not to read too much into this notability page. First of all, it's Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines##The differences between policies, guidelines, essays, etc.|a guideline, not a policy. We can work around it and completely outside of it, with no adverse consequences.  also reminds us: "''meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept.''" The pertinent section, on albums, notes it "is somewhat controversial" (which is to say that it's more controversial than notability in general, which is always controversial). The albums section then says, "''if the musician or ensemble '''that made them''' is considered notable, then their albums have sufficient notability''" (emphasis mine). That's a particular distinction. The artists here '''did not make these''' albums. They weren't involved in the production. Their creative process was already over when these albums were compiled by the marketing divisions of the record company. So all we get out of  is this: a guideline, which we don't have to follow, which says it doesn't mean the articles must be kept, and says the relevant section is especially controversial, doesn't even apply because the notable artists didn't make these albums. So don't read too much into it. I believe the pertinent question is rather, "why would albums not even created by notable artists be notable on their own?" And I don't believe this has been answered
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Hopefully these articles will be kept as most of the reasoning I am seeing here against there inclusion would fall under Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. You are correct that  does not always have to be followed but normally if the decision is going to be made to remove something that meets the criteria there should be several good reasons why, the same would go for including something that doesn't meet any of the criteria. Your sole argument is that it is a compilation album that feautures previously released songs from different artists. You fail to give any other reasoning at all. I'll play your game and we will just totally forget (which these albums clearly meet the criteria of) for a second. You cannot deny the cultural impact of this series. The compilations can be purchased at numerous major retail stores, I am sure any other product that is available in numerous major retail stores such as the The Simpsons DVDs (didn't those already air originally on TV and thus the DVD's are just a compilation of episodes sold just to make money) would be considered culturally signifigant and worthy of inclusion here on Wikipedia. Also you seem to be ignoring the fact that most of these albums have charted in the upper half of Billboard 200 chart and are sourced as such on their pages, how is that for standing on their own? The fact that they did chart so well proves that they would be of interest to many music enthusiats and they would want to read about them. Also these albums show what songs were considered to be the most popular CCM songs for the year of each individual release and are notable in that aspect as well. Do you have anything on these compilations at all that merits deletion except for the fact that you don't feel they are notable because they are compilations. You  have stood by that despite evidence produced to the contrary and you haven't really elaborated on why that should disscount them from inclusion, so if possible could you please do so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: These seem to fall way short of  and in any event Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I am unconvinced by the notability of compilation albums in of themselves no matter how notable the songs and artists they feature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)