Deletion of Jennifer West

Comment: Meets . Cleaning up the inversion of sources and external links can be done with just a bit of work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: I think Qwyrxian is right about the functional reversal of the "reference" and "external links" section headings. The external links include e.g. http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/sep/23/art.exhibition this extended article from the UK ''Guardian'' newspaper, as well as http://www.frieze.com/issue/review/jennifer_west/ this article-length profile from Frieze and http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0268/is_9_47//ai_n53386292/?tag=content;col1 this similarly-detailed one from Artforum (both prominent design publications). That level of international coverage is for me enough to indicate compliance with . It needs inline cites, for sure, but I don't think it needs deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Her exhibition record alone qualifies her per . The article needs a clean-up and references, but otherwise she's notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: It actually looks like she meets  to me.  I think the problem is that, from a Wikipedia perspective, References and External Links have been inverted.  I've looked at a couple of the EL, and they appear to meet our  guidelines as substantial independent reviews of West's exhibitions.  This seems to meet the requirement of multiple instances of non-trivial coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)