Deletion of Oxbridge

Comment: but trim aggressively. I believe some of the article is probably  that is essentially unsourceable, but this is an obviously notable term/concept and deserves a proper article. This isn't unsalvageable, it just needs a thorough rewrite and sourcing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: That pretty much sums up my position exactly; while the ''idea'' of an article on this topic has some merit (e.g. a short stub explaining where the term comes from and what it signifies) nearly all of the current article content is |original research; it's essentially unsourced editorial opinion at the minute and it would need, as you say, a total rewrite to fix - I don't think that's a practical solution. Best to nuke and start again IMO
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)