Deletion of Jaql

Comment: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24151-2_5 This paper is an independent reliable source and discusses Jaql in some depth, comparing it to Pig and Hive. http://books.google.com/books?id=C3jwVZl39k4C&pg=PT286&dq=%22Jaql%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ei=X50GU7-fKpXtoASb6YCoAg&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22Jaql%22%20-wikipedia&f=false This chapter in the book ''Connected Computing Environment'' has about 1 1/3 paged on Jaql and a comparison to Hive and Pig; the authors work for IBM India and seem unconnected with Jaql's creators, so perhaps independent enough and an RS. A third source is http://rgpv.ac.in/iccbdt/Papers/44.pdf this paper which is independent and an RS, but is not quite in depth. There is a http://www.techrepublic.com/resource-library/whitepapers/jaql-a-scripting-language-for-large-scale-semistructured-data-analysis/ TechRepublic white paper on Jaql, but I haven't signed up to assess its content; it may be another independent RS that is in depth. Altogether the first three sources may be enough for marginal notability according to the general notability guidelines . The article itself is new and lacks secondary sources, but otherwise has no major problems. A marginally notable topic and and an article with no major problems suggests keeping the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)