Deletion of Ken Rice

Comment: Although I still feel both the nom and Trey are voicing nothing more than  as their reasoning, I no longer feel the page is worthy of my endorsing it as a Keep. This is more based on the other pages for KDKA personalities that are up for AfD at present. Those are just cut-and-paste jobs from the KDKA site. This article is not quite that bad. Not good, though, either
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: WP:BIO does give awards as a secondary criterion for notability.  certainly does not specify "five indepentdent, reliable, verifiable sources that are non trivial, in-depth, and primarily about HIM". I've changed my vote to weak keep, as he isn't the most notable person here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)