Deletion of Land recycling

Comment: Not encylepedic"'' is not an adequate reason to start an AFD as it is begging the question.  The topic has such http://books.google.co.uk/books?um=1&q=Land+recycling&btnG=Search+Books notability that it is clear that our |deletion process has not been properly followed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: and improve.  The article is unsourced, but it is not at all clear to me that it's .  Clicking on any of the "find sources" links above makes it abundantly clear that there are sources here and that the topic is notable.  Contrary to the nom, the subject is highly encylopedic. In retrospect, I'm surprised the article is of such recent creation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)