Deletion of List of fictional railway stations

Comment: Fails  ,  and .  Per , every entry in the list is supposed to meet the notability criteria for its own non-redirect article in the English Wikipedia.   None do
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:CSC||WP:LSC||WP:CSC)

Comment: The nomination quite fails to explain and justify itself (a classic ).  There are entire books about fictional railways such as ''Transport in British Fiction'', ''The Railroad in Literature'', ''The Railroad in American Fiction'', and plenty of notable fictional stations such as Walford East, Titfield and platform 9 3/4
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE)

Comment: per Andrew D. ,  and  all redirect to the same page, where the only relevant guideline is  - a very disingenuous tactic that does not encourage the belief the nomination was made in good faith. If you actually read that guideline you will clearly see this list meets point 2 as Andrew D notes. There is therefore no policy or guideline referenced that gives a reason for deletion and no other explanation for why deletion would improve the encyclopaedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC||WP:LSC||WP:SALAT||WP:CSC)