Deletion of Ballyhoo (lighting cue)

Comment: The problem is that none of that historical information is backed up with any reliable sources per |verifiability policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: If''' the article isn't a hoax, then it's a good article.  The additional information provided in the article (names of inventors, their background, etc.) move this past a simple dictionary entry.  If the WP article stopped at the end of the first sentence, then I'd agree with a deletion based on .  But this is not a good application of DICT, and, assuming good faith for the offline references, two references is enough to establish notability for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICT)