Deletion of Jaat - The Story of Revenge

Comment: I'm the first independent editor (after the creator, and a bot) to touch this article, when I took out the {{tl|Good Article}} template.  I believe the article creator just doesn't understand the workings of Wikipedia.  The pleas for more time, with no timescale proposed, are likely too long-term for an AfD discussion, given that the article is now one month old and still has no reliable, independent English-language sources about the film (as opposed to about the actress).  Moving to userspace, rather than deletion, would give the author the time he wants to improve the article, as well as time to learn about key Wikipedia topics like .  &nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: We're not doubting that the film exists. The question is whether it is notable, does it have significant independent press coverage? Follow these links for guidance on what criteria notability is determined on:  (for any article) and  (particularly films). The second issue is that usually people who are close to the subject i.e. the filmmakers in this case, shouldn't create articles as they are likely to have a conflict of interest. Those sources you've cited may help Oviya meet notability but not the film she's in. On a side note, a bit concerned about this editor's recent edits on the actress, Oviya's page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: Clear COI as written by the production company. No significant independent press coverage. Doesn't meet . Created for promotion of an actress, would need to be rewritten significantly to be encyclopaedic. Potentially  Speedy Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTFILM||WP:G11)