Deletion of Athena Starwoman

Comment: Being tagged for improvement is not a valid rationale for deletion, see  and . There's also a fair bit of coverage, see: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/14/archives/a-night-out-with-athena-starwoman-and-her-nieces-triple-conjunction.html NYTimes profile, https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/athenas-3m-sea-change-was-written-in-the-stars-20020414-gdf73b.html SMH 1, https://www.smh.com.au/national/astrology-tycoon-a-mystery-woman-20041220-gdkcjr.html SMH 2 ({{tq|Australia's most famous astrologer}}), https://www.dailymercury.com.au/news/apn-astrologer-loses-fight-with/149255/ Daily Mercury, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/54398980/the-age/ The Age, http://web.archive.org/web/20010124151500/https://www.cnn.com/US/9611/02/superstitious.women/ CNN, and likely more. Unless I'm very mistaken, that's a pretty clear pass of GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: meets , sources added to article emphasise this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)