Deletion of Turning points during World War II

Comment: This is a clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Being subjective is not necessarily a problem as long as there is some kind of cademic consensus about what qualifies. This is however not the case here, as the article itself notes. The source cited for the views of historians—https://www.historynet.com/what-was-the-turning-point-of-world-war-ii.htm—makes this abundantly clear. If anything, the prevailing view seems to be that the concept of a turning point does not apply to WWII (or as the nominator put it, {{tq|It seems like an answer in search of a question}}). It might theoretically be possible to write an article about the lack of a distinctive turning point in WWII as compared to other wars, but that would require way better sourcing and would at any rate constitute a rather significant scope change—it wouldn't be a different version of this article but rather an altogether different article. As it stands, this is essentially a list with no proper 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:LISTCRITERIA)