Deletion of Johnny Sins (2nd nomination)

Comment: Is this article any better than the one which was -deleted in 2016? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Sins
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: In my understanding, #2 ''"Have a large fan base or a significant cult following."'' It applies to pornographic actors who go beyond the line of anonymity
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: NACTOR)

Comment: per . —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: a fan-based award (i.e. "Favorite Male Porn Star") does not meet , per long standing consensus, and there's nothing better. Lacks  to meet , and none has been presented at this AfD nor available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:SIGCOV||WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: At the least, he meets  with his "Favorite Male Porn Star" win at the 34th AVN Awards in 2017. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: I don't quite understand why but the news keeps covering him therefore passing the .http://www.news18.com/news/buzz/adult-actor-johnny-sins-just-tried-biryani-with-naan-and-the-internet-is-done-for-the-day-1879731.htmlhttp://www.thisisinsider.com/male-porn-star-johnny-sins-eats-turkish-snacks-on-youtube-viral-2018-4http://slate.com/technology/2018/04/johnny-sins-eats-turkish-snacks-on-youtube-and-youtube-loves-it.htmlhttp://www.abc15.com/sports/sports-blogs-local/photoshopped-little-league-graphic-fools-adult-film-actor-mediahttp://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/10/02/a-running-list-of-viral-hoaxes-and-misinformation-about-the-las-vegas-shooting/?utm_term=.dbff7d3ae223http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/06/11/pornhub-crowdfunds-for-sex-tape-filmed-in-space/?utm_term=.dadeecbbceb9
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is almost all trash, but the fact remains that Sins is one of the most prolific performers on the major porn websites. He doesn't qualify for an article under , but I find it hard to believe that |reliable sources can't be found that establish his notability under  or . —&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG||WP:reliable sources)