Deletion of 2007 European Karate Championships

Comment: According to  the usual criteria for notability for athletes is participation at the highest level and most specify Olympics or world championships.  That's why the focus is so often on "world championships."  Logically, if you can't become notable by winning a particular event, it's hard to claim that event is notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)

Comment: zero independent sources to establish lasting notability. |Run-of-the-mill sporting event.--Special:Contributions/70.80.234.163|70.80.234.163
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: as failing . No  are presented, only what appears to be the official results. If some coverage can be found '''Merge and redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: According to , the event is not inherently notable. It then falls to the  to establish notability, requiring reliable third-party sources. I can find none of these, and none have been provided, suggesting a lack of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:GNG)

Comment: unless someone can explain the nomination to me.  tells us what is "inherently notable", it does not suggest articles on other sports events are not notable. Where does the relevance of "world championships" come in? Is this just the nominator's view? All the examples of inherently notable events in SPORTSEVENT are regional. If the article is not notable on its own it should be merged with European Karate Championships and not deleted. However such a merge would make the target article very lop-sided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)