Deletion of 2014 White House fence jumper

Comment: it's disturbing that so many editors in this kind of debate express their contempt for Wikipedia policy (
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: ec}} There was more than one person who scaled the White House fence last year (at least four, plus a toddler who got away from his parents), so the article title is ambiguous at best. This incident also received far less press and was far less controversial than Omar Gonzalez (who actually entered the East Room). , , and  certainly apply. This incident really deserves nothing more than what is already on White House intruders. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability is not temporary because a story is less covered over time. per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: or '''merge''' if anything significant is not at the combined article yet).  - this received lots of coverage for ''one day'', clearly failing .  does not apply as notability would have to exist in the first place for that to kick in
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOTTEMPORARY)