Deletion of Aviva Chomsky (2nd nomination)

Comment: Keep'''. GS shows only decent citation rates for one of her books (''West Indian Workers and United Fruit Company'') and even that one at 130 cites is not that heavily cited. The other books have citations rates around 20. Does not meet . However, per the sources found by GreenC, meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: The article makes no claim that she meets any of the requirements for . Merely publishing a book obviously does not establish a sufficient level of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Chomsky's published a lot more than just "a book"; she's published about a dozen of them (including those for a general rather than strictly scholarly audience).  Many of these books, along with her journal articles, have what look to me to be reasonably high citation counts in indexes such as Google Scholar, and have attracted professional reviews.  She may therefore pass  (according to the first criterion) and/or  (according to criteria 1 and 7
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The nom's first rationale that "Notability is not inherited" is incorrect. Please note that there is no rule about this. INHERIT is an ''essay'' meant to educate newbies on what not to say during an AfD discussion ie. don't just say someone is notable because of their birthright. It ''doesn't'' mean we are supposed to ignore sources, ignore  and ignore . Also, citing INHERIT in a nomination, before anyone has even !voted, is a misapplication of the essay which is part of the series "Arguments to avoid ''during an AfD discussion''". It's a red hearing to bring it up in the nomination before anyone has even argued anything
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTE)