Deletion of Angela Zhang (scientist)

Comment: It's definitely true that a subject does not have to pass  if they pass  instead. Usually this matters for historical figures, who are hard to evaluate by  (a guideline geared towards researchers active now). It can happen under other circumstances, too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: as passing  per KoH and Britishfinance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: since she doesn't meet the notability guidelines for academics. The only thing that might make her notable is her cancer research, but it doesn't seem like the research has received any wide spread coverage. Maybe  would apply instead of , but then only one source, U.S. News., would qualify IMO. The other one from The Mercury News wouldn't because it's a local paper to the area she lives in, local papers cover that kind of thing, and I don't think that Siemens Competition is a high enough award for it to be notable on it's own. Especially since there isn't more regional or national news out there about her winning it. Ultimately, this should come down to if her scientific research has garnered peer notice. Her article is about her research, it's likely the only reason she has one, and so you can't say it's not relevant to the AfD and that  is the only that applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)