Deletion of Catriona Bhatia

Comment: Article doesn't provide evidence of genuine notability. A fair amount of coverage in independent media, but much of it stems from being David Steel's daughter rather than anything notable in her own right. All mentions of her first establish her family ties - if anything, this would warrant a paragraph in a "family" section on David Steel's page rather than a page of it's own. A large number of sources refer to a single event - her losing her council post. In this respect I don't think she has met  as she has not received any significant press coverage beyond this single event (see ). The guidance stipulated for single-event notables would seem to being towards a redirect into David Steel's article, although I personally don't think the story is really notable enough for that. The fact that she has been elected to an office and held a cabinet role as a result of it does not on its own establish her notability. Nor does her candidacy in the 2017 General Election
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:SINGLEEVENT)

Comment: Local councillors are not automatically eligible for Wikipedia articles just for serving on local councils, but the sourcing here is not strong enough to get her over  in lieu. Of the eight references here, three are  coverage in the local media where such coverage is merely ''expected'' to exist for ''all'' councillors ''regardless'' of whether they clear ''our'' notability requirements or not; another three are in Scotland-wide media outlets' local news ''sections'' for the specific local area where she's a councillor, and thus is still simply routine and expected; and of the remaining two, one is a mere table of election results in a national newspaper's comprehensive local election results section in which ''every'' councillor or council candidate across the ''entire'' United Kingdom would have a "profile" with as much information as that, and thus is ''still'' merely routine and expected. And Times #3, the ''only'' source in the ''entire'' bunch which suggests the possibility of ''more'' than purely routine and expected coverage, is (a) a deadlink whose content is |unverifiable, and (b) strongly implied by its headline to have actually been in the context of who her father is rather than in the context of anything she did in her own right. But notability is  — so if there's not enough substance or sourcing to deem her notable because of who ''she'' is, then she doesn't get a free pass over the bar just for being the ''daughter'' of someone who does. Simply put, none of this is enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:V||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Plenty of national news media coverage, quite sufficient to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)