Deletion of Synagogue shooting

Comment: per . Wikipedia is not a look-up service for synagogue shootings, or for attacks in any house of worship. And why stop at shootings? What about firebombings
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per , thank you. "Synagogue shooting" is a phrase used around the world since the Pittsburgh shooting, and I can find coverage of incidents using this term going back to 1981. (Sorry - attempts to strike my first vote and rationale through end up striking through the whole rest of the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: move to List of synagogue shootings; a valid list article. Also per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: as nominator. "Synagogue shooting" does not constitute a valid article topic. The article presently has no |sources supporting the existence of that topic. Just because an editor makes up a fictitious scope for an article does not mean that topic is valid for an article. In fact this so-called article is not even about its topic area suggested in its title. The article says nothing about synagogue shootings. Nothing—not an iota. We don't just concoct articles to suit our fancy. You can know this is gibberish because you can ask yourself—what is a synagogue shooting? The answer is that it is the mere putting together of a "shooting" with a "synagogue". The title of this article implies the simplistic joining of two obvious factors. No sources are in the article addressing or supporting the simplistic joining of "shooting" with "synagogue". Nor are there any sentences in the article addressing this made up subject. An article has to make assertions. No assertions are made in this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)