Deletion of Beechwood Avenue

Comment: due to the article not making any claim that would give a reason to believe it to be notable. Unlikely to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: If somebody could |properly source some ''context'' for the road's political, social or cultural significance as demanded by , ''then'' we'd have a notable road that qualifies for a Wikipedia article. But as written, all this does is describe the road's ''physical'' characteristics — which is the kind of article that ''fails'' our notability criteria for roads. It's not enough to just assert that a road is important to its own neighbourhood; the notability of a road is determined by reliably sourcing some ''context'' for the road's political, social or cultural significance, not by just unreferencedly stating that it exists and has stuff on it (one or both of which things could be said equally of every single road anywhere on the planet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ROADOUTCOMES)

Comment: fails . If deleted, Template:Attached KML/Beechwood Avenue should be deleted as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: maybe passes , just barely. I see
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This one is a run of the mill road unfortunately. The sources do confirm that it exists, but there doesn't seem to be any particular social, cultural or historical significance.  specifically requires that we have enough third party sources so as to be able to write an article on it. I don't see enough sources discussing this in detail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WHYN)