Deletion of Allie X

Comment: Satisfies .  She (1) "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." See references 1,2, and 3 for a start.  (2) She has had a single on Canada's hot 100.  She meets two of the criteria for musicians, and only one is required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Allie X (meets ), '''merge''' the other two. Too soon for separate articles; if we had separate articles for every song which ever charted, we'd have no room for anything else.  overrides subject-specific guidelines, which are intended to be used with common sense, and there's a lot of source overlap in these articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: ping|WordSeventeen}} Archive.org error fixed. Also, it doesn't matter if it failed  because the GNG specifically states "or or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right." These guidelines are ones people continuously have told you, known as the  and BIO which is most certainly does not fail
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUS||WP:MUSBIO)

Comment: meets  #2 by having a verifiable hit on a national music chart. The article could do with a serious copyedit, but deletion is not the answer
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSBIO)

Comment: You are not acting in accordance to wikipedia policy. I tried to act in good faith now, but you very clearly are either not reading the article or you can't follow guidelines. On primary sources, this is what the guidelines say "Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.4 Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source. Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so. Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them. Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material. Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy." I have not interpreted primary source material. Another thing, the articles you removed like Vice are so far from a self published blog with no editorial oversight it's very clear you didn't even bother to learn about the institution. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_(magazine) I also cannot even fathom what kind of issue you had with a archived, broadcast radio interview.     —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:MUS||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: This reference #1 http://web.archive.org/web/20110302183749/http://stickymagazine.com/recommendations/upcoming-shows/408-allie-hughes goes to an archive.org site with an error message "Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_ in /home/stickyma/domains/stickymagazine.com".  This reference #2 http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/5930347/who-is-allie-x-catch-singer-talks-katy-perry-shout-out-her-pop is a brief mention not significant coverage. Fails . This reference #3 http://time.com/4409/allie-x-catch-single/ is also just a brief mention, not significant coverage, also fails . So two are trivial brief mentions and the third goes to an error page sort of like a dead link. Not sure what the problem is there with archive.org and stickymag.   The VICE reference a user refers to above goes to a blog type site with no editorial oversight. They contract out to freelancers for their content and have no editorial oversight. http://noisey.vice.com/blog/allie-x-i-dont-want-to-be-anyones-bitch NOT WP:RS) Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: Keep Catch (Allie X song), per my keep vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catch (Allie X song). Keep CollXtion I, per the non-trivial sources in that article, including reviews from ''Exclaim!'' and ''Edmonton Journal'', as well the sources talking about the songs from the album. Keep Allie X, per , as others have been pointing out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)