Deletion of Mesg

Comment: tq|This concept does not show its importance, it fails GNG and NSOFTWARE}}.  GNG never mentions importance.  WP:NSOFTWARE is an essay.  Mesg easily passes GNG with the thousands of refs (https://www.google.com/search?q=mesg+linux&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS688US688&oq=mesg+linux&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0.2312j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=mesg+linux+-dmesg+-umesg&safe=off&tbm=bks books for example).Bigger issue, could this be merged elsewhere?  Bg (Unix), Fg (Unix) and Lp (Unix) were all subprograms of a larger process.  For bg and fg,  these two commands are part of controlling various jobs, thus they were redirected to job control (Unix).  For lp, it is a print command under System V printing system, thus the reason for the redirect.  The problem with mesg is that it doesn't fall under another system.  It's used in conjunction with Talk (Unix), Write (Unix) and wall (Unix).{{tq|...but WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is only an argument useful for showing we have more garbage like this to shed}}   This is a  and not an argument for deletion.  Does this have "Significant coverage" in "reliable", "independent" "sources"? Yes.  Is this something listed under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not?  No.  Therefore, it passes GNG and be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)