Deletion of 2010–11 AFC Wimbledon season

Comment: The fact that  references college sports and not association football alone makes the argument for deletion of all these articles unconvincing. Furthermore, I think the amount of interest and discussion that has taken place in favour of keeping these articles suggests there is a genuine desire to improve them and further demonstrate their notability. The fifth tier comprises of a large number of professional clubs and there is no reason why a professional club, such as all of the above which are included in this nomination shouldn't have a season article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: per the  failure. I enjoyed reading the claim that it was Cambridge's 98th season playing in the Conference National though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: Clubs at Conference Premier/National League level receive much the same level of coverage to that of many Football League clubs, from both national and local media.  We should bear in mind that  is not sport specific; none of the five bullet points seem to apply in any way to an association football club season
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: non-notable per , fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:GNG)

Comment: So, to summarise, the arguments in favour of deletion are (1)  and (2) . The arguments in favour of keeping are (1) not agreeing with the guidelines, (2)  and , (3) a mistaken claim about the guideline that actually refers to college sports, (4) the fact that these clubs were previously or went on to become Football League clubs and that some past or future seasons of the clubs do pass the guidelines, and (5) claims of  using news articles that are either  or don't actually refer specifically to the subject in question
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSEASONS||WP:HARDWORK||WP:LONGTIME||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: I got as far the first reference on the first page http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/13418508 looks like it meets  to me - if being promoted to the Football League for the first time ever isn't notable, I don't know what is. Not sure this should be done en masse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , long standing consensus, as observed in more detail Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Grays Athletic F.C. season|here is that clubs in non-|fully professional leagues are not notable enough for their own individual season articles. Furthermore, there is nothing in any of these articles that would satisfy wider GNG, as, essentially without exception the articles are either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:FPL)