Deletion of Love on Top

Comment: Article was obviously only created so that Beyonce could have more song articles on Wikipedia. Seems like  to me. I'm in the same place as Nathan above me right now, the song is notable, yes, but is the article necessary? I'd say '''incubate''' would be the best option, with moving it into the main space if a video comes out, or it becomes a single
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: This article has everything to meet . Moreover, it has charted which further supports its existence. There are hundred of articles on Wikipedia about songs which do not deserve to be here. I do not believe "Love on Top" is one of them. Out of the 32 '''professional reviews''' ''4'' received, above 80% of them mention this song. It got significant coverage. And please do not believe it charted in South Korea for one week. It remained at number 3 for 3 weeks selling above 50000 copies (which equals to 5000 copies in the US) each week. There is at least a quote by Beyonce in background. What more do you want
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: although I m against the creation of pages for non-singles experience has taught me that the community is happy to have pages like this exist when there are reliable sources. This song has receieved a lot of coverage from reliable sources, it has charted on a national single chart and is thus notable per . There is too much information here to merge to ''4'', which is another reason to keep this article. (looks like a  to me...) &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: per nomination and . I also suggest '''incubation''' after '''deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: As stated by other users before me, the song has charted very well in Korea, remaining in the Top 10 in the country for a month and a half (roughly). As the creator of the page (with some great help from other users), i can honestly say the article was created ONLY to educate people on the song and in ''no way'' is to "favor Beyonce" by giving her more song article. Anyone using  as an excuse to delete the article is speaking out of their ass, excuse the language, because to them this is just another Beyonce article made only because of that- to be a Beyonce article. But no. I saw the song had charted VERY well in Korea and took advantage of that to create a page that details the songs creation and speaks ''very highly'' on the structure of the song, focusing mainly on the vocal structure used in the song, which is a new thing to Beyonce. I do not understand what to "Incubate the article" means, so i can not voice my opinions on that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)