Deletion of Hoplophobia (3rd nomination)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a dictionary - #DICT. The neologism should not be there. There should be no debate on that one. The medical condition is where there may be some debate, but in this case the quality of sourcing does not meet GNG and it is hard to see how this can be argued to be an accepted medical condition considering the silence of all major and reliable sources on the matter. This from
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I think the article as it is strikes the right tone: it puts the term in the context of its use in politics. This is not a medical diagnosis and "hoplophobia" should not be portrayed as a medical diagnosis (as it is without appropriate -compliant references). However, there isn't enough evidence of notability for an article, so we should not have an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)