Deletion of IronmongeryDirect

Comment: yeah, '''everything''' I could find was either a re-printed press release or an advertorial. The company seems to be quite upfront about that and almost all list the company as the "source" or "author". The three provided as sources for the article are among the few that seem to have been written by people not directly connected to the organisation, which is a start, but they still seem to be (essentially) re-prints of company announcements. I'm not seeing anything that would suggest the company has had the sort of significant impact on industry or depth of coverage that would help the subject meet . Certainly not the sort of egregious promo-spam we're used to seeing, but I still don't think |notability has been adequately established
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:N)

Comment: Thanks for your comments, but could you refer to some ''policy'' under ?  See also 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:AADD)