Deletion of List of Gantz equipment

Comment: Fails #PLOT and  as a list. I see a great deal of original research in the description, typically preceded by  |weasel words such as "seems", "appears". And finally, understanding the equipment is not essential to understanding the series nor are they covered by third party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT||WP:AWW)

Comment: Unnecessary list of unnotable fictional items, references are all primary, obvious ownership issues (no, merges do not necessarily require consensus and can easily be done under old and removing completely valid tags for questionable reasons). No point redirecting, it's a questionable search term and based on edit history, likely to be reverted. Seems pretty open and shut
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: no assertion of notability whatsoever through |reliable sources independent of the topic and clearly fails #PLOT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: Another example of . Fails , , , , the previous and currently proposed , and can probably never be written in accordance with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:PLOT||WP:DIRECTORY||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:WAF)