Deletion of Zachary Oberzan

Comment: Multiple reviews in the NYT and other newspapers for significant parts of his oeuvre constitute sufficient coverage under . I do agree that the current biography is pretty spammy and unhelpful, but that's a job for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: and allow continued expansion and sourcing of this mere weeks-old article. Any SNG we look at only allows a presumption that coverage exists.  So encouraged by SNGs, we can instead look directly at available sourcing to find |7 years of ctitical commentary and coverage in multiple reliable sources for multiple eventshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2004&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22Zachary+Oberzan%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Zachary+Oberzan%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go and so deternmine that we have enough to allow a decent presumption of notability.  And with such reasonable presumption, we can encourage this article by a new editor be further expanded and improved.... and I'd be glad to help out
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)