Deletion of Farnhurst, Delaware

Comment: per the |significant expansion that's taken place; compare https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Farnhurst,_Delaware&oldid=1039336637 the revision at the time of nomination with the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Farnhurst,_Delaware&oldid=1040022951 current article. It's hardly recognizable -- and I think it's unlikely it would be nominated the way it is now. Sure, not ''all'' of the sources are demonstrating GNG pass, but there's 29 of them, which is fairly substantial, and the article has a lot of fleshed-out prose that demonstrate their relevance to the content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: I've found 1920 census population data for Farnhurst, and it was indeed considered a town/village even back then, with a population of 332. I would have already added this citation to this article (and all Delaware communities mentioned on page 175), but the number of Delaware-related deletions in the last few weeks has outpaced my ability to add references (I've been traveling), and additionally one of my PDFs (the 1900 one) has gone corrupt. Still, though, Farnhurst meets  as a populated place, with a verifiable population listed in serious reference works. I don't know why we would delete an article on a place noted in other reference works. While there does need to be clean-up of sub-stubs, this article is no longer a stub, and I'm seeing some troubling dismissal of historic reference works (like the https://books.google.com/books?id=xif5aF6LszUC 1904 Gazetteer of Delaware) in some of these nominations. ''Assuming'' a printed reference work is incorrect in an AFD is troubling, because it's really the opposite of what we should be doing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)