Deletion of Islamic terrorism

Comment: All three pages. This kind of AfD is getting to be a perennial. People take offense at the suggestion that something unattractive might be associated with a religion, and they want to wipe out the page instead of improving it. The nominator states that the basis of the nomination is , but I infer from the comments that it is more specifically , since the pages in question are sourced. However, there is plenty of sourcing—reliable, secondary sources—that associate each of these page topics, that is, associate acts of terrorism with the history of the respective religions. The pages do not claim that the respective religions have terrorism in their nature, but that there have been acts of terrorism related to one another by their (sourced) motivations. Of course, what is really going on here is , but the correct solution to that problem is not to delete the pages, but to correctively edit them for any POV issues, such as any unverifiable claims that terrorism is intrinsic to the religion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COATRACK||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Islamic terrorism. This is certainly something real, and of course otable. The name is unfortunate since Islam itself and most Muslims do not support terrorism, but that is the name most often used for these terrorist attacks by groups who identify themselves as Muslim
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)