Deletion of Amoy Street (Hong Kong)

Comment: I've been thinking about this one for a while, and it seems to me that the sources added since nomination are just ''barely'' sufficient to meet . If someone has valid arguments why each of them isn't (or enough of them that there are no longer 2+ good ones), I'm content to be overruled
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amoy_Street_(Hong_Kong)&diff=prev&oldid=480327005 added a couple of refs to contribute to establishing notability. The scmp.com ref may be behind a paywall but the cited URL includes a scan of the article. I think it highly unlikely that there was not more coverage of this at the time. The article as it is begs the question "So, what happened?" Deleting it will preclude other editors from building its entry in the encyclopedia. Meeting  has yet to be proved but that is not to say definitively that those refs are not available or likely to be included. http://www.ura.org.hk/en/media/press-release/2008/20081013.aspx is one further ref I found, albeit from a primary source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)