Deletion of General Finance Acceptance Limited v Melrose

Comment: The nominator needs to read . The fact that an article does not ''cite'' any sources is not a valid rationale for deletion, because the nominator is suppossed to look for sources and add them to the article. That said, this article does cite a source, namely the New Zealand Law Reports. The nominators ignorance of New Zealand law ("there's a serious danger in giving bad legal information") is not a valid rationale for deletion either, as the nominator is suppossed to attempt to verify the propositions of fact and law in the article before nominating it for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)