Deletion of List of video games developed in Belgium

Comment: I find it odd that the nom suggests keeping the Netherlands article simply because it has a large number of entries. If the number of entries and edits to the articles (along with the idea that they won't be improved) are the justification for deleting them, why not keep them and apply some ? I'm sure there are enough games out there for the small lists to match or exceed the Netherlands list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:FIXIT)

Comment: as complement to :Category:Video games by country of developer category structure per . Really nothing need be more said to justify them, given that the deletion arguments above are a laundry list of |arguments to avoid (particularly ).  already sets forth the capabilities that lists have that categories do not, and all of these lists are already even developed into sortable and annotated tables. And if the developer's country is significant enough to categorize, then it's significant enough to list; you can't claim the same information is indiscriminate in one context and not in another when the only difference is the presentation format
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:AADD||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:AOAL)

Comment: I don't see any valid deletion rationales here. Only having 3 edits isn't a reason for deletion, neither is that it'll "probably never be finished". These lists go hand-in-hand with the categories they are in (for example :Category:Video games developed in Belgium), and as they're a list of notable articles, per , they should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: or '''Merge''' - The category "list of games developed in X" ties the game to a country ''via a developer''. What makes sense is to have one or more lists of developers/designers/publishers in the country, and then a separate least for the games each of those developers/designers/publishers have released (likely built into the article about those entities). That's the underlying meaning here.  means it doesn't duplicate a category and shouldn't be deleted for that reason; it ''doesn't'' mean that we should have a list for every category (i.e. that it's not a deletion rationale doesn't make it a keep rationale). I say delete or merge because there may be developer lists it would make sense to move the content to. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: These articles qualify per  relative to the following categories
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)