Deletion of List of nontheists

Comment: the article, '''Agnostic''' on the list.  I reject the argument that if something isn't in the dictionary it is  or , as there are lots of reliable sources other than dictionaries.  Nontheism is covered by many, such as the book "Godless for God's Sake: Nontheism in Contemporary Quakerism".  As for the list, I personally think it's pointless and unmaintainable, (i.e. ).  Since Nick Graves had solid arguments about the list and I don't, I'll refrain from further comment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NEO||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: per Nick Graves and because the root of the term "non-theist" is defined by OED, which makes the slight variation "Nontheism" not . Also, while the prose needs a lot of work, there is definite potential to expand. Also seems like there is only one editor (the nominator him/herself) vehemently for the deletion and their only points were well refuted by Graves in his original response. The list is weaker as the names are not self-identified as non-theists and many could object to "Nontheist" as soon as "Atheist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Nontheism, all atheists are nontheists, but not all non-theists are atheists, the concepts are closely related, but not synonymous. '''Weakish keep''' List of nontheists afterall most of the articles on religious positions |have associated lists of notable proponents, I think those lists should really stand or fall together
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)