Deletion of Kevin L. Tan

Comment: Satisfied that the sources identified by Cunard are sufficient to pass the GNG or BASIC. I understand there are many  because of COI issue. However we should follow the rules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKE)

Comment: Not quite, the '''first source''' you used has all the tale marks of a covert sponsored piece and only discusses the subject of our discussion within the confines of him succeeding his father as the next ceo. The '''second source''' is basically an extended announcement that yet again discusses the subject of our discussion predominantly within the confines of him becoming the next ceo of his fathers organization which leads us to the '''third and last source''' you provided which states that the piece is an ''“advertisement”'' in the body of the article and furthermore appears to be an interview with the subject of our discussion which makes It immaterial as the source isn’t independent of the subject and {{green|GNG requires in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of '''the subject'''}}. You are welcome to go through  in your spare time. Furthermore notability is earned by merit and not my proximity to a notable entity or individual. See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Cunard has sufficiently demonstrated that the subject has had multiple coverage in reliable sources per the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: and  this title as well - Celestina's comments are correct
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: Meets  per Cunard's argument. The sources presented above are reliable enough IMV
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: u|VocalIndia}}, please let’s be mature and tone down the sarcasm. Now, if you claim the article has been improved then please point me to three reliable sources that discuss the “Businessman” with in-depth significant coverage. Furthermore please you are also welcome to read 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA)

Comment: The subject was extensively covered in the reputable major Philippine newspapers ''The Philippine Star'' and the ''Philippine Daily Inquirer'' and the Philippine edition of ''Esquire (magazine)|Esquire''. There is substantial biographical coverage about him, which I included in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin_L._Tan&diff=1023440621&oldid=1023420542 my complete rewrite of the article. Kevin Tan passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says: People are presumed {{strong|notable}} if they have received significant coverage in {{strong|multiple published}} {{strong|Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources}} that are {{strong|Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable}}, {{strong|intellectually independent}} of each other, and {{strong|Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent of the subject}}. The coverage spans nearly a decade: 2012, 2013, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. Extraordinary Writ is correct in noting that Kevin L. Tan's association with his notable father and with Alliance Global do not prevent him from becoming notable when there are multiple articles from reputable national newspapers written about his early life, business career, and personal life.The original creator may be an undisclosed paid editor and sockpuppet (I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FZaid_Zayd&diff=1023549548&oldid=1023497183 created a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zaid Zayd). But that should have no effect on this article. I do not have a conflict of interest with the subject, and I completely rewrote the article without using any of the prior content because it contained copyright violations. No content from the creator, who is a single-purpose account, remains.Pinging {{user|Spiderone}}, who participated in this AfD and who wrote in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Andrew L. Tan|the previous AfD, "Speedy delete - per , if he is actually notable, someone that isn't a banned sock can write an article on him". I am not a banned sock, and I wrote an article about him because I think he is notable. Would you take review the rewritten article and the sources? Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G5)