Deletion of Stacey Murphy

Comment: unless somebody can actually improve the article. ''Regardless'' of the size of city involved, the notability test for mayors is ''never'' just the ability to offer technical verification of her election to the office in and of itself — getting a mayor over  #2 requires you to write and |reliably source some genuine ''substance'' about her political ''impact'', such as specific projects she spearheaded, specific effects she had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. For starters, Burbank is a council-manager city with a weak mayor system — which means the mayoralty is ''not'' directly elected by the voters, but instead the position simply rotates annually among the city councillors and confers little to no actual executive authority beyond chairing the council meetings. The notability test for mayors is not the ability to offer verification and reverification and rereverification of her existence as a mayor, or the ability to locate the names of her husband and kids — the notability test is the ability to write and source a detailed and substantial article that demonstrates her political ''importance'', which is not a description of this article in this form
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS)

Comment: She hasn't received enough press coverage. Doesn't matter if she is the mayor of a city of 100,000 people or 200,000 people. See  bullet 2: ''Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)