Deletion of Barbara Sobel (2nd nomination)

Comment: per . It can't be good if  https://web.archive.org/web/20120308102554/http://main.gonzomusic.com/english/news/new-music-weekly-announces-2010-new-music-awards-nominations.html one of the 2 sources is a listing naming them as the Top 40 Promotion of the Year...among 5 others, all unencyclopedic entities themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: WP:ANYBIO is not automatically passed by every winner of just any award that exists; it requires notable awards that get |reliable source media coverage. But there's none about the awards, and there's none about her as a person either, but nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to get over  on the sources. This is also a likely |conflict of interest, as the article was created by an  with no non-Sobel-related edit history — but Wikipedia is , and is not a place where people are entitled to place their own résumés for the publicity if they don't have reliable source media coverage to make them notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:COI||WP:SPA||WP:NOTLINKEDIN)