Deletion of Khalid Latif

Comment: per  unless sourced. The issue here is that nothing within the article itself is sourced. Pages where the content is origional reserach should be deleted. Bsides this version is poorly written, and if kept, needs a complete rewrite
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: don't you feel that these links (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/04/03/2007-04-03_nypd_adds_muslim_cleric_to_ranks-2.htmlhttp://media.www.nyunews.com/media/storage/paper869/news/2007/04/03/News/Islamic.Chaplain.To.Serve.Nypd.Will.Stay.At.Nyu-2819387.shtml http://www.princeton.edu/~paw/archive_new/PAW06-07/03-1025/features2_muslim.htmlhttp://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2006/09/27/news/15951.shtmlhttp://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C04%5C04%5Cstory_4-4-2007_pg7_7http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04EEDB1F30F930A35757C0A9619C8B63 ) fulfil the criteria specified by 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Although I found his bio interesting, he doesn't seem particularly notable at this time. Being the first chaplain of a particular faith to a single police department, even in an important city, doesn't seem like it comes close to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: as non-notable per . Many people get a mention in local papers, and have important jobs; that does not automatically qualify them for mention in an encyclopedia, otherwise we would have a bio article on every fireman, police officer, priest, teacher, doctor etc... on the planet. The notability bar is set higher than this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)