Deletion of Takahiro Yoshikawa

Comment: Hey {{ping|Ohnoitsjamie}}, he was covered in Japanese national television (NHK), how much better can it get for a classical Japanese musician? In addition https://www.classicalwcrb.org/post/cd-week-takahiro-yoshikawa-claude-debussy#stream/0 Classical Radio Boston reviewed his disk as disk of the week. It would be great if you take a look at it again and reconsider.  says in general that a topic which is discussed in-depth by multiple |reliable  sources is worthy of an encyclopedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:INDEPENDENT)

Comment: as there are now enough references added to the article that show coverage in multiple reliable sources such as Italian newspapers, 51news, NHK, Swiss Public Radio and others so that  is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The fact that most of his recordings appear on a label "dedicated" to his output is a significant minus, but I confirmed the Deutsche Grammophon release.  That's pretty much the apex in classical music releases.  I find significant coverage at 51news.it (in the article, added since nomination) and Corriere della Sera.  The repubblica.it by Mosca and www.giornaledellamusica.it (also added since nomination) do nothing to help establish notability, they are passing mentions.  The Lavoro article at repubblica.it and the nishinomiya-style.jp (largely an interview, but there is independent information there as well) add more coverage, certainly more than passing mentions but not very deep.  All in all I think  is barely met.  One more release on DG and  would certainly be met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NMUSIC)

Comment: Hey {{ping|Ohnoitsjamie}} & {{ping|Lullabying}}, sorry for busting balls so much but I really have a question that drives me nuts: this is my first new new article so I checked the guidelines for  (multiple independent trustworthy sources is given by Corriere, ARG, NHK, Classical WCRB) and I checked the treshold for musicians (national coverage, records, multiple mentions). I understand that he's not Mick Jagger, but he ticks all boxes requiered. Can you help me to understand better what to do to improve the article. Because if notability rules are applied strictly, this one is in and deserves to stay. How can the combination of biggest broadcaster in a country (multiple times), biggest newspaper in another country (multiple times) not be enough, at that point, what is enough? I sometimes believe the rules are used very arbitrary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article is poorly sourced and there may be  issues. Just because NHK did one TV spot on him doesn't mean he's notable enough for an entire article when there is almost no coverage on him -- the Classical Radio Boston news source may suffice but it isn't enough. His Japanese Wikipedia article has almost no sources/information. I looked at his https://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/666433/products/album/ Oricon profile and while he has released some albums, none of them have charted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)