Deletion of Alexandru Dimca

Comment: Passes rof for reasons very clearly expressed above.  Moreover, this is one of a series of Romanian language RODs which points out a systemic bias.  A lot of serious Romanian scholarship is not translated into English.  So they are underrepresented in various search engines.  in fact, the change in lettering and names creates a GIGO conundrum for searchers, even though they may be diligent and seemingly thorough.  Finally, this motion fails because of efore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:PROD||WP:B)

Comment: Passes rof for reasons very clearly expressed above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: The high citation counts for his monographs (and also for the ''Annals'' paper "Hypersurface complements, Milnor fibers and higher homotopy groups of arrangments") should be good enough for #C1 in a low-citation field. The festschrift also adds support to the case that he has a high profile as a mathematician
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: GScholar gives an h-index of 24, which is comfortably above the level we generally accept for mathematicians, particularly in a highly theoretical area like algebraic geometry, as satisfying #C1. While GScholar can sometimes be overgenerous in what it counts as a citation, experience in theses AfD discussions suggests that the most reliable citation counters (to which I do not bave access) are very unlikely to give an h-index low enough (distinctly below 20 in this field) to change my judgement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)