Deletion of Katherine Porter

Comment: The subject definitely passes  #4(d) "The person's work (or works) has: ... (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." This is easily verifiable by searching the collections of the museums listed in the article. The nominator appears to think that this is not enough, but Wikipedia:Notability states "A topic is presumed to merit an article if: (1) It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right," ie explicitly stating that it meets EITHER the  OR . Someone whose works of art are in at least 6 major museums would probably also meet other criteria of , and perhaps also the , if one were to search newspapers, art journals, etc. Such sources could be added to the article, but as the article makes a clear, easily verified claim of notability, it should definitely be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG||WP:SNG||WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: easily meets (nominator must be joking that Porter "arguably meets") , works held at
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST)

Comment: per multiple reviews posted above (''NY Times'', ''ArtForum'', etc.), holdings in multiple significant art museums, as well as entries in ''https://books.google.com/books?id=AYxmAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA450&dq=%22Porter+Katherine%22 North American Women Artists of the Twentieth Century: A Biographical Dictionary'', and ''Who's Who in American Art.'' These suggest enough published secondary sources exist, beyond the ones listed above, to make a neutral, encyclopedic article, even if short, and thus the assumption of  is warranted (there are likely other print reviews that aren't instantly Googleable).  While the article currently reads rather promotional and subjective, Articles for Deletion is not Articles for Improvement, and articles shouldn't be tagged for deletion merely because the current version is sub-optimal (). Note: the artist's full name appears to be '''Katharine Pavlis Porter''', as named in several editions of ''https://archive.org/search.php?query=%22Porter%20Katherine%20Pavlis%22&sin=TXT Who's Who in American Art'', the cover of ''https://www.amazon.com/Noon-Knives-Paintings-Collages-Katherine/dp/B0091XMLEU Noon Knives'' (2002), the https://digitalccbeta.coloradocollege.edu/pid/coccc:10247/datastream/OBJ 1963 Colorado College commencement program, and as suggested in the contact email at http://katherineporter.net/contact. Some websites and databases give the name "Katharine Page Porter", e.g. https://www.skinnerinc.com/auctions/2387/lots/534 Skinner Auctions and even the https://www.getty.edu/vow/ULANFullDisplay?find=&role=&nation=&subjectid=500006389 Getty Union List of Artist Names. However, I beleive this is an error: the only credible art-related "Katharine Page Porter" appears to be a friend of Angna Enters who was an elementary art supervisor in Beverly Hills in the 1940s.https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.498908/page/n5?q=%22Katherine+Page+Porter%22,https://archive.org/details/uncommoneloquenc0000mand/page/208?q=%22Katherine+Page+Porter%22
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)