Deletion of The World Water Organization

Comment: First, sorry if I have offended anyone, it was not my intentions. Since you just admitted working for the WWO, then I just want to let you know that there is Conflict Of Interest regarding your articles since you are a new user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONFLICT#How_to_avoid_COI_edits or . Therefore try to be less personal. I totally respect you values, engagements but try to keep a neutral point of view. Finally, I have seen that you have put alot of effort in finding sources/references but from what I can see, the majority of those references ''only'' mentionned WWO's name (such as being a sponsor) and does not really talks about this organization itself; there are not strong enough in supporting the article's notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: with no prejudice to recreating if the organisation gets more |reliable sources in the future. Their website seems to have moved up in Google's ranking to first in the list, but it's still a one page work-in-progress and furthermore a primary source. Found some fleeting mentions of the organisation on http://www.cnbc.com/id/29834704 CNBC and the http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=29796&Cr=water&Cr1=agriculture UN, but that does not seem to qualify as significant enough coverage to me as yet. I have dropped a few lines of friendly advice on article creator's page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)