Deletion of Syra Madad

Comment: Reading the sources provided in the article alone, Madad clearly meets the standards set forth by the . She's given not just passing mention but actual substantial, sustained coverage in multiple national and even worldwide news outlets. From the sources we have in the article alone, this very obviously isn't a case of . Moreover, there are many more articles giving Madad substantial coverage and/or coferring notability than just in our Wikipedia article. For example, a cursory search turned up https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2021/02/06/netflix-pandemic-dr-syra-madad-explains-how-to-protect-yourself-from-faster-stronger-covid-19-variants.html this interview published yesterday by ''The Toronto Star'' (Canada's highest-circulation newspaper), https://abcnews.go.com/Health/speeding-covid-19-vaccinations-race-time-opinion/story?id=75180734 this op-ed on ABC News by Madad less than a month ago, https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2021/2/4/the-medical-barriers-to-healthcare-for-ethnic-minorities-in-the-w this interview from Al Jazeera three days ago covering Madad's opinions and biography, https://cyber.harvard.edu/events/organizing-budgeting-and-implementing-wraparound-services-people-quarantine-and-isolation this seminar co-delivered by Madad at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center two weeks ago, https://www.businessinsider.com/doctors-explain-why-covid-prevention-doesnt-stop-at-immunization-2021-2?op=1 this article from ''Business Insider'' three days ago co-authored by Madad, and I could ago on. I want to emphasize that I've always been extremely skeptical about BLP notability (as https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=&limit=500&target=TheTechnician27&namespace=4&tagfilter=&start=&end= my history on AfD will show), but that there's just no way this subject falls short of the GNG. I'll add here as well that the 'Career' section of the article would be well-served by subheaders
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Based on recently found sources, I'm leaning towards keep rather than 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)