Deletion of List of Internet phenomena

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per nom. List criteria is far too broad, far too widely open to , and ultimately |unverifiable. This list has the potential to rapidly explode to an unusable, unweildy, monstrous size. Non-encyclopedic and not useful. If something is a legitimate internet phenomenon, it can have its own (sourced) page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per  (a web directory) and  from .  ,  and  are not policy even if the interesitngness or usefulness were objectively provable. Any whuach are substantive and verifiable can be placed in an appropriate category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL)