Deletion of Goodhew (Kent cricketer)

Comment: per  and all the above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: meets  having played in matches that have been designated as first-class. There are several of these mononymous articles for early cricket history and I think for baseball too. What's important to realise is that many of these articles do have scope for improvement, it may just take some time before the research is done at a RS-level so that we can reflect it here. As an example that was on my watchlist today, Christopher Bethell-Codrington began life as https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christopher_Bethell-Codrington&oldid=224222878 Codrington (MCC cricketer) and took several years before it was expanded. I think it likely that, in time, Goodhew could be similarly expanded
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: per  or discuss new rules which would affect every professional competitive team sport on Wikipedia. These discussions don't seem to come up when faced with an NHL, NFL, MLS, MLB, NBA player. Unless they do, of course. To "draw a line" regarding some kind of article merging several cricketers into one is a violation of NPOV
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC)

Comment: The player being cited in ''Scores and Biographies'' and it being agreed by ''CricketArchive'' he played in at least three matches rated first-class, is meaning he was a notable player. The article is in much need of expansion and improvement, it is true, but the player is most certainly meeting  and . Those two sources being cited, there can be no denying reliability of sourcing. I am reading much about early cricket history and it being clear to me standards were very high, no doubt in my mind that Kent in 18th century is deserving of first-class status (but until just now I have not read of this player). I am assuming ''Scores and Biographies'' is calling a fourth match first-class, one that ''CricketArchive'' calls "miscellaneous", unless author made mistake with "four" instead of "three". '''Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIC||WP:CRIN)