Deletion of John Durrant

Comment: Lack of available sources suggests that he is not notability. There is no evidence that the subject meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS)

Comment: GS h-index of 20 in the field of audiology (there seems to be more than one "J D Durrant") passes rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: He has a weak claim of notability under ; his articles received a moderate number of citations (two got over 100) and he seems to have been a bit of an authority on vestibular dysfunction. But he never rose above the titles of "professor" and vice-chair of a department, and now (according to his faculty page at Pitt) he is emeritus. All in all I think he fails WP:PROF and is a run-of-the-mill academic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR)

Comment: due to apparent failure to meet /, in addition to lack of sources which might enable meeting . This is despite my very great concern at the incoherent and irrelevant arguments advanced by some of the other people !voting delete - which I would like to be noted by the closing admin. ''Only'' arguments based on policy and guidelines should be taken into account when closing an AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: How  doesn't fail? This article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)