Deletion of Glowing pickle

Comment: article-author here) I had planned to move it to Glowing pickle demonstration (it's usually something you see not that you do yourself, and it's more about the glowing than the simple conductivity), but Glowing pickle experiment is reasonable too. But I did not want to rename it while a discussion about its previous form was happening at eletion review
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D)

Comment: verifiable and notable science experiment. The present sources in the article shows the experiment stands out of many and no convincing reason for deletion. This is also not  as the nom thought, as clearly shown by reference used. I also agree with renaming (move) as some people suggested above, although this is not place to discuss such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Pardon me if I rant a bit here.  AfD's sometimes make me shake my head, usually at the total crap people are arguing to keep.  This one makes me sad, and a little angry, at the idea that we're trying to get rid of an article on an important STEM topic.  I'll admit I had never heard of the glowing pickle experiment until a few days ago, but it didn't take me long to discover that this is a classic electrochemistry demonstration.  What makes it popular is the entertainment value, but it's also a serious scientific demonstration.  It touches on both classical chemistry of salt solutions and electrical conduction, but also on quantum mechanics and atomic orbitals to explain the electroluminescent properties.  If we're not keeping articles like this, what's the point?  Anyway, there's tons of good sources.  Here's some of the best that I found in a few minutes.  Presented more or less in order of value to demonstrate 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)