Deletion of Appeal to psychology

Comment: I did a search for this term appearing in textbooks and other discussions of topics in logic; however, it seems to appear incidentally, not as a formal fallacy itself (see http://books.google.com/books?id=FPWVTmyojSoC&pg=PA114&dq=%22Appeal+to+psychology%22+%2B+%22logic%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c9DsUZvaCsbhyQGN3IDQCA&ved=0CFoQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=%22Appeal%20to%20psychology%22%20%2B%20%22logic%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=eXkv2ftf73sC&pg=PA95&dq=%22Appeal+to+psychology%22+%2B+%22logic%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c9DsUZvaCsbhyQGN3IDQCA&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Appeal%20to%20psychology%22%20%2B%20%22logic%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=Z8xCAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA615&dq=%22Appeal+to+psychology%22+%2B+%22logic%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c9DsUZvaCsbhyQGN3IDQCA&ved=0CGMQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22Appeal%20to%20psychology%22%20%2B%20%22logic%22&f=false, http://books.google.com/books?id=0jSS-3Bl06cC&pg=PA363&dq=%22Appeal+to+psychology%22+%2B+%22logic%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c9DsUZvaCsbhyQGN3IDQCA&ved=0CF8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=%22Appeal%20to%20psychology%22%20%2B%20%22logic%22&f=false).  As it seems unlikely to be a formalized term, it can have no |significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)