Deletion of Peace and violence in Judaism

Comment: At this time, it's become evident that this article and AfD have become pawns in a drawn out struggle that's beginning to violate  and even , starting with the creation Judaism and bus stops, and then the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaism and bus stops, then this AfD, and then a follow-up AfD guaranteed to arouse controversy at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaism and violence. Right now the situation seems to be one of people getting carried away with  and  because of what's going on, and it's time to stop this vicious cycle and go on with rational mature editorial behavior. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:WAR||WP:POINT||WP:REICHSTAG)

Comment: The article contains many POV issues, gross distortions of cited sources based on a clear agenda, and undue weight to fringe opinions, issues which need to be resolved. However the topic in whole is notable and covered by many scholarly works which explicitly discuss the topic of Peace and violence in religion and specifically in context of Judaism. I believe the nominator is misinterpreting , which says "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources" and  which says "Personal essays that state your particular feelings about a topic (rather than the consensus of experts)." This article is neither. Peace and violence in Judaism is just as a good topic as Judaism and sexuality, Judaism and abortion, Christianity and homosexuality, or thousands of other articles in Wikipedia which are notable topics based on reliable sources. Judaism and Bus stops which was given as an example fails the notability guideline, and not  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:NOTESSAY||WP:SYNTH||WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: as this article contravenes #ESSAY
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The ill advised and somewhat bizarre renaming aside, there is nothing in this article that meets the criteria for deletion. The only justification given by the nominator is that of |synthesis which even a cursory glance at the references shows to not be the case. The relationship between Judaism and violence is a clearly established field of academic work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: to Judaism and violence, per IZAK. I find the AfD nomination concerning and not a little Y
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: to Judaism and violence its original name, as it fits with the rest of this group: Mormonism and violence; Christianity and violence; Islam and violence; Religious violence the latter being a very broad and serious topic, and then work on improving it. But the word "peace" inserts a different subject and focus. Please avoid . Thank you
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)