Deletion of Beatriz Colomina

Comment: Easily meets  criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed). Has at least one book, ''Sexuality & space'', currently in more than 500 major libraries worldwide according to http://www.worldcat.org WorldCat. Has an h-index of 15 based on GS, and at least 3 pubs with more than 100 citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Okay, going by . Firstly, Beatriz Colomina is a faculty member and directer at Princeton University, as well as winning a 2003 Old Dominion Faculty Fellow, so she passes the professor test. She has also won three grants, at the Chicago Institute for Architecture, Fondation Le Corbusier, and the Center for Advanced Studies. Colomina has three books published, as well as essays in journals. Also, all of these things are sourced on the page. It is relevant to people interested in architectural history and theory and criticism but I see why somebody who is not would not see her as notable. I don't really see why the article would need to be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Founding director" is absolutely not the kind of "highest elected position" that WP:PROF talks about. University president, that would do it, a mere director not. "Old Dominion Faculty Fellow" does not seem to be http://humanities.princeton.edu/fellows/old-dominion any distinction at all, it just seems to be a discussion group. Obtaining grants (not "winning" them) is something all academics have to do in order to stay employed. Unless one of those grants was uniquely prestigious, this does not meet any of the criteria of PROF either. The same goes for publishing, whether books, essays, or articles and lecturing "throughout the world": every academic publishes, that's what they do, so this does not meet any of the PROF criteria either, ''unless'' those publications have been noted (book reviews, notable awards, for example). If the awards mentioned in the article can be |verified ''and'' shown to be major awards, that might confer notability. What does go a long way towards meeting PROF#1, though, is Colomina's citation record. The above link to Google Scholar shows several very highly cited publications (one with more than 300 citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)