Deletion of Eric Dinowitz

Comment: per  as a city-level politician he is not inherently notable. New York City, while a very famous city, remains a "city" and should not have more inherent notability than other cities, except for some circumstances
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Not voting either way - I'm not sure GNG is satisfied, but it could be, and I'm not going to do the work to check on this one, at least not right now. I just don't completely agree with the "major city exception" to  - I'd like to make sure  is met here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Again,  is not a valid reason in and of itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: I don't see anything in  that says an exception to the rule is to be made for prominent cities, let alone just for NYC. The guideline says ''"Just being an elected local official ... does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline."'' City politicians are by definition local. I don't see GNG being satisfied. And to say that other NYC politicians may have articles is merely the  argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:OSE)

Comment: as a member of the New York City Council the subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)