Deletion of Allan Paul Bakke

Comment: I suppose he passes  by virtue of being "|the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works" like http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=4&did=685632842&SrchMode=1&sid=5&Fmt=10&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=HNP&TS=1160659013&clientId=15020 and  http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=0&did=80287174&SrchMode=1&sid=6&Fmt=10&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=HNP&TS=1160659239&clientId=15020.  And using sources such as these, the article could be expanded to include details about Bakke that don't belong in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.  But as it stands, I don't think there's anything in Allan Paul Bakke that's not already in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)