Deletion of Blosting

Comment: as  and an attempt to hijack Wikipedia for his own gain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Something reported, and verified to have been done twice, is |something made up after school. BJAODN and all that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: per , , , , ... &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:NPOV||WP:NEO||WP:NFT)

Comment: You infer from this that one person, or a small collective of people, are solely responsible for steps 1,2 and 3. This is not the case. I discovered the Count Chocula entry through http://kottke.org kottke.org and appreciate the interesting problem it poses for Wikipedia. The solution is not to simply delete. To do so violates a number of Wikipedia policies, most notably 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)