Deletion of World University Rankings 2015

Comment: First of all,  is completely, astoundingly, irrelevant to this article.  This list has exactly none of the qualities discussed there.  Secondly,  is an essay, not policy, and it also does not apply here.  That essay is about indiscriminate lists, that is lists without a well-defined inclusion criterion.  This list has a perfectly well-defined objective binary inclusion criterion, stated right at the top of the list: Universities "''which are ranked in the top 50 by at least one of the following...''"  Thus there's no valid reason given for deletion.  Finally, the actually applicable notability guideline, , tells us that a list subject is notable when the entries have been discussed as a group by RS.  That's clearly the case with World University Rankings.  See e.g. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2018/feb/28/qs-world-university-rankings-2018-arts-and-humanities The Guardian, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/best-universities/most-international-universities-world-2018 Times Higher Ed Supplement, and so on. Special:Contributions/192.160.216.52|192.160.216.52
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMIRROR||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:LISTN)