Deletion of Advanced NFL Stats

Comment: Cited as a source in the research of several reliable sources as noted by the nominator, including ''The New York Times'', ''Wall Street Journal'', and the ''Houston Chronicle''. I'd say delete if it were just cited once or twice in a small paper or even in any one of those aforementioned, but it appears to be viewed as a trusted source of information by several highly respected news orgs. Many other :Category:Online databases|databases have articles, and many have survived deletion (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArchINFORM|1, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10eastern|2, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airliners.net|3, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoardGameGeek|4, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Cartoon DataBase|5) which shows precedent. Also, the fact that the WSJ or NYT sources are "blogs" is not relevent; eliable sources says "otherwise reliable news sources--for example, the website of a major news organization--that happens to publish in a "blog" style format for some or all of its content may be considered to be equally reliable as if it were published in a more "traditional" 20th-century format of a classic news story
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)