Deletion of Stelth Ulvang

Comment: I love the work you've done since the article was nominated, {{u|Pesticide1110}}, and have more faith in this version than what was initially presented here. Eddie, however, brings an excellent point to the table. He might meet GNG, but I think he's "close but no cigar" on criterion 1 of , which you've been pushing. It might say "multiple", but you can't just have more than one and call it a day, either (not that that's ''quite'' what you're doing). What I'm more concerned about is if ''enough'' of his coverage fits the "non-trivial" bill presented in that criterion. If this is as deep as his profile goes, I'm uncertain if it's worth keeping on Wikipedia at this time - his only real occupation that got him relevance and notability in the first place is touring with the Lumineers, a notable band. (And ''only'' touring with, so he doesn't meet criterion 6 of MUSICBIO either.) So I'm torn - I'm happy with letting this stay, but if it's truly the right thing to do, maybe it'd be best we redirect him to the band's article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Hi {{ping|Pesticide1110}} A lot of it seems to be affiliate and paid advertising and there is not a lot of coverage in Europe. As a western band, if successful, there would be plenty of coverage on both continents, as it is a core market. It seems to be common pattern with successful bands, but I don't see it here. I could be talking nonsense, but I've done reams of these bands on NPP now and that is what you generally see, and I don't see it here. They may be ultra successful in the US, but UK papers like the Times and the Telegraph would report on them and there would be coverage and there is not. As far as I can see, its a local or regional band, who are signed, with some limited success, which is the worst kind of notability to establish a article on here. Perhaps 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: would be best for now until one can be easily convinced that  has been satsified
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: to The Lumineers. doesn't seem to meet  or  independently. The best coverage of him is a profile in https://m.cityweekly.net/utah/stelth-ulvang/Content?oid=2306076 ''Salt Lake City Weekly''. However, almost all the coverage is in short profiles ahead of his performing (see for example https://www.heraldextra.com/entertainment/music/sound-hot-ticket-nick-jaina-the-lumineers-stelth-ulvang-are/article_af47cdcf-d0fe-522c-811b-eb711a72fe86.html ''Sound Hot Ticket: Nick Jaina, The Lumineers' Stelth Ulvang are coming to Provo'' and https://parkerchronicle.net/stories/packed-house-for-stelth-ulvang,276510 ''Packed house for Stelth Ulvang''). Coverage of him is largely limited to local news sources, most of which describe him as "The Lumineers Stelth Ulvang" which tells me that his significance is largely dependent upon being a member of the band. To show independent notability we would expect in-depth articles in comparatively large news sources (not regional) covering his career outside of the lumineers, like reviews of his EP's, features about him, evidence his music has charted somewhere. I simply don't see that depth as the coverage stands
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPERSON||WP:MUSICBIO)