Deletion of Tomislav Dulić

Comment: We have no actual evidence of passing any notability criterion, just vague assertions that being director should be enough (even though that doesn't pass any notability criterion). His https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=HtH-1VAAAAAJ single-digit h-index definitely does not pass #C1; that's not really a strike against him, because he's not working in a subject where i would expect this criterion to work well, but neither can it be used as evidence of notability. And the article lists only one sort-of-book, his doctoral thesis, which would not be enough for  even if we had more than the one review I found https://doi.org/10.2307/20060313
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: No pass of rof yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Being a director doesn't give her automatically qualify for , she should have some notable work in the academics field to pass  which luckily she doesn't have. I completely agree with Russ Woodroofe and David Eppstein explaination here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: His book has gotten a modest number of citations (in what I believe to be a low citation field), although I could only find one review https://www.jstor.org/stable/20060313.  But I'm not seeing the kind of impact that I believe  is looking for.  It's possible that it's just , although I'm noting that the subject's career seems to have slowed quite a bit since his PhD thesis (on which his book is based).  A possible alternative to deletion would be to '''redirect''' to a page on the book, but I'm not confident that there is even really enough coverage for a page on the book
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:TOOSOON)