Deletion of Society for the Advancement of Management Studies

Comment: The references are extremely lack luster and clearly fail the notability guidelines. Just to break them down, 1 and 2 are both primary and basic business listings with no real details of the charity, in-depth or otherwise. Source 3 is about "The History of UK Business and Management Education" and does not discuss the company in-depth. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 are are all primary sources, not independent of the charity, and do not talk about it in-depth or really otherwise except in passing. Source 19 has absolutely nothing about it and just contains a name drop of one of it's trustees. Finally, sources 20 and 21 have absolutely nothing to do with it either. So, 17 out of 21 sources are primary. One is only a brief mention if even that and the rest have nothing to do with subject of the article. Therefore, this unequivocally fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG)

Comment: Even after improvement, still fails  and .  The sources that provide significant coverage are either not independent or not reliable or both.  This is a regular charity doing |regular charity things and this is |not a directory of all "deserving" organizations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:GNG||WP:MILL||WP:NOTDIR)