Deletion of Direct 8

Comment: per  and lack of . Multiple easy-to-find significant secondary sources: http://www.leparisien.fr/loisirs-et-spectacles/direct-8-devient-une-vraie-concurrente-02-12-2008-328649.php Le Parisien, http://www.20minutes.fr/medias/209734-Media-Direct-8-Nicolas-les-femmes-et-le-coup-de-ciseau.php 20 Minutes, http://tvmag.lefigaro.fr/programme-tv/article/divertissement/45206/direct-8-est-devenue-un-media-de-masse.html?print=1 Le Figaro, http://www.lepoint.fr/actualites-medias/2009-05-27/direct-8-s-offre-l-equipe-de-france-espoirs/1253/0/347025 Le Point, http://www.la-croix.com.prd-jsp.bayardweb.com/article/index.jsp?docId=2210820&rubId=9199 La Croix
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Reliable secondary sources are available that are comprised of significant coverage about the topic. Also, importantly, per , ..."The absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable." See also: , "Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE||WP:IMPERFECT)