Deletion of Erika Harlacher

Comment: neutral essentially. More or less on the fence with this one. On one hand, her roles mean she should pass  without too much difficulty, but on the other, you'd think such roles would land her RS coverage, but there isn't much; sources like Anime News Network often run interviews for voice actors but she has none. The only truly "good" source I see is #26, which discusses her with some detail, and that plus the number of (albeit shallow) sources available and ENT nudges me slightly to the keep side. Nevertheless, I'd be wary of using her having roles in notable anime as the sole argument for keeping, as that runs afoul of . Would like to see at least an article with Harlacher as the primary subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: per |NACTOR point 1 (significant roles in multiple notable productions). Also, |INHERIT, on its own terms, is inapplicable here; from INHERIT: "Four of the notability guidelines, for creative professions, books, films and music, ''do'' allow for inherited notability in certain circumstances
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:NACTOR||:WP:INHERIT)

Comment: Per , the fact that she voices characters from notable series does not make her automatically notable. Where is the background info, the reception on her voice acting? Her own comments on the characters she voices is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: After a bit of a flip/flop I can see now that much work has gone into the article, she passes  with now biographical info
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: She has a lot of reliable sources not just from convention info, but also has several interviews and articles relating to Erika Harlacher and how she started her voice over work. So she definitely passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)