Deletion of Aspartame controversy

Comment: Article with 90 references is too long to merge. Perhaps rename to "Criticism of ..." or similar, and provide a  in the main article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: It's not a fork, but an application of |summary style. If it is to be merged back into aspartame, someone will have to trim it to a reasonable length. Will that happen within 5 days? I doubt it. In any case, the merging can be handled via the normal editing process and doesn't require deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: I agree that this reads like a  of Aspartame, but I'm wondering if this is actually a legitimate article split (if the section was too bulky in the main article) that has, over time, become full of anti-aspartame PoV. Perhaps this article just needs trimming of PoV and, if that results in a large amount of it being removed, being merged back into the appropriate section of Aspartame. I'll wait for any opinions from people more involved in the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)