Deletion of Priashevshchina

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NNEWSPAPER)

Comment: As per K.e.coffman and the sources shown in the article which pass the GNG. If the nominator is looking for "extraordinary things" to be worthy of keeping, that is not how the GNG works, nor is the fact that the paper "published for a few years" an indication of a lack of notability.  clearly states it is for organisations "with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources to prevent gaming of the rules by marketing and public relations professionals. The guideline, among other things, is meant to address some of the common issues with abusing Wikipedia for advertising and promotion." Which is hardly appropriate for a historic journal that as the nomination notes ceased publication many years ago. Nor is  a good argument for the same reason, and in fact has a subsection Wikipedia:DEFUNCTNEWS for this very reason
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT||WP:NNEWSPAPER)