Deletion of List of food products

Comment: per  and by the author's admission within the article that the list cannot be meaningfully maintained or expanded by authors other than him or herself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: per . This appears to be an indiscriminate statistical chart on a very broad topic. There are so many different types of food in the world, you cannot possibly make a single list of them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: as a useless  and unmaintainable per  #6. The above concern is addressed in detail in the existing article Human nutrition, which can be linked to instead of creating a new article. The nominated article is also unusable for statistical analyses: the list (copied directly from the source, with pointless inclusion of the UPC and PLU codes that vary from product to product) is very limited, prices vary between brands and markets and are constantly changing, and amounts of nutrients also vary between brands of the same food product. Also remember that Wikipedia is made to be read by people, not computer programs (although some advocate limited amounts of metadata in articles such as GPS coordinates
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:LC)

Comment: as this list topic fails #DIR as it does not have a verifiable definition in accordance #List content. Lists without a verifiable definition are mere istcruft|listcruft without any externally validated rationale for inclusion in Wikipedia. A list needs some form of external validation in accordance with  to demonstrate that it is not entirely novel or the product of |synthesis, and looking at the definition of this list, it appears to me to be a synthesis of sources, and therefore it is an entirely novel and original list topic that has never been published before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:LISTS||WP:L||WP:BURDEN||WP:SYNTH)