Deletion of Dan Bilzerian

Comment: Unsavory as his character is, he passes  http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/the-truth-about-dan-bilzerianhttp://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/10/09/dan-bilzerian-dakota-meyer-feud-over-las-vegas-shooting-intensifies.htmlhttp://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/dan-bilzerian-trophy-hunters-instagram-eat-what-you-kill-gun-owners-a8066756.htmlhttps://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8gk84v/did-instagram-bro-hero-dan-bilzerian-get-his-start-thanks-to-his-fathers-dirty-money-827http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/who-dan-bilzerian-instagram-king-caught-las-vegas-shooting-1641552http://people.com/crime/police-close-investigation-of-dan-bilzerian-34/. Even if he's done stuff we don't deem important, the media finds interest in him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: One of the most famous media personalities in the world - proved not only by 15 Wikipedia articles in other languages but also by record-breaking number of followers on Instagram and Facebook (thus his nickname) as well as daily coverage in the press and  on television internationally. A few users' opinion about  his relevance here shouldn't compromise the fact that Bilzerian is way too overqualified for all  requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per , tabloid being one of them. The individual has not accomplished anything significant. Article consists of trivia such as: "In February 2015, Bilzerian pleaded no contest to a misdemeanor charge of "negligently failing to extinguish a fire in the open" and was fined $17,231.50" Etc. Sources are not suitable for establishing notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)