Deletion of List of legislation named for a person

Comment: This discussion provides the opportunity for an interesting application of current list related guidelines.  I intend to withhold my position until I see further discussion, but have these general comments.  If we were to apply |list notability guidelines to this article, then I would expect to see sources that demonstrate Legislation named for a person has been discussed as a group by a reliable source.  I suspect those sources exist but a quick Google search doesn’t reveal them.  Quite possibly this is because we haven’t really characterized this list very well.  Quite possibly (I am not a expert in law), what we are really referring to are ''Namesake Laws'' or ''Namesake Legislation''.  Whether those are traditional legal terms, I do not know, but if they were, and there was an article entitled ''Namesake laws'' (there isn’t), then this list would be a perfect extension of the main article, regardless of how broad a topic that might be.  The other alternative is to view this list as a |set-index article where the only entries were namesake laws that had WP articles.  Red-linked articles would not make the cut.  If that is the purpose of the list, then ''Index of Namesake Legislation'' is a better title. I'd like to see some of the ikiProject Law weighin on this. I am appending the  tag to this discussion, to see if some of the above can be addressed in the article and this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL||WP:SETINDEX||WP:W||WP:ARS)

Comment: I am confident the list meets  requirements for notability and that we can sort out inclusion criteria.  Needs work, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL)