Deletion of Anand Sen (business person)

Comment: Absolutely nothing'' is |verifiable by |reliable sources.  The sources are not even wrong -- one links to a different person, possibly a mentor.  Even if this could be made into an article, |it needs to be destroyed and started from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:TNT)

Comment: There's no "B" in this BLP.  We can vouch for his position, but per  he's not necessarily notable for it, and he doesn't inherit from Tata Steel.  The sources are also not independent - having a Bloomberg Stock listing isn't proof of notability; it's a management reporting requirement sourced from the company's filings.  Nothing else in there is biographically useful.  I'm also skeptical of the Indian Institute of Metals medal meeting criteria in this case - the IIM article states that it rents its office space from Tata Steel, and doesn't mention the medal at all. So I question the independence of the award with on other justification, and I question the notability of the award when it's not mentioned.  His "so many papers" linked from that other guy's page amount to exactly one co-authorship on a peer-reviewed journal.  The other sourced are from Tata, so they aren't independent and only speak to existence.  Show me something arm's-length, and that's a different story, but I'm not seeing it so far in my searches
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP)