Deletion of List of Australian Anglicans

Comment: Should only be kept if all the entries are based on accurate and |attributable source material, particularly as this involves . I would also suggest it be kept only if the people on the list are prominent espousers or clergy, staff etc in the particular faith. Otherwise it seems to have little purpose other than an #Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|list of internal links or #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|bunch of indiscriminate information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:BLP||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: it fails the requirements for a list article to exist that are outlined in  in my opinion, because it would be unbounded. If it were changed to List of notable Australian Anglicans I would change my vote. Lists of notable persons can be bounded. As to the above discussions, I don't think that people on the list should need to be notable for their Anglican involvement, they can be notable for any reason
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: per the failure to comply with the policy on |living persons; the information contained within the list can be conveyed equally well through categorization of the individual articles if the religious affiliation is sourced within the article as required by policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This is pushing it and setting a dangerous precedent for  fans
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)