Deletion of Susan M. Gaines

Comment: per  that states "A person  is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published3  secondary source material  which is reliable, intellectually independent,4  and independent of the subject.5". See for example: San Francisco Chroniclehttp://articles.sfgate.com/2001-03-04/books/17588452_1_carbon-dioxide-gaines-carbon-dreams, "http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/pdf/10.1525/bio.2009.59.8.16 Molecules, Mud, Moon Rocks, and Microbes" in BioScience, September 2009 / Vol. 59 No. 8., the ref sections in the two books she has published: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carbon_Dreams&oldid=360782100 Carbon_Dreams and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Echoes_of_Life:_What_Fossil_Molecules_Reveal_about_Earth_History&oldid=360711163 Echoes of Life: What Fossil Molecules Reveal about Earth History
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: per |past outcomes, and Thparkth's analysis of WP:AUTHOR criteria. Gaines is therefore, notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I had never heard of Susan Gaines prior to this AfD, I still don't know much about her, and I have never edited the article. I think that there is some misunderstanding on the delete "side" about . As "additional criteria" under , a person is "generally notable" if they meet any of the specific criteria for persons of their type. Since Susan Gaines is an author, she is presumed to be notable if she meets any of the criteria of . It is arguable that she meets ''several'' of the  criteria, but it is '''certain''' that she has "created... a significant or well-known work, or body of work, that has been the subject of... multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". In a Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)/Archive_2010#_.233_is_unclear|recent discussion on the  guideline, no one was able to provide an example of an article about the author of a notable book being deleted on notability grounds. It very clearly and explicitly is the intention of  to extend the notability of a notable book to its author. Anyone who believes that this article should be deleted on notability grounds has the responsibility to show why Susan Gaines is not notable ''despite'' being the author of a notable book, which otherwise would be presumed to make her notable per guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: failing all criteria in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)