Deletion of Sean Nee

Comment: Google scholar gives clear pass of #C1 as Xxanthippe has already noted — some 23 papers with over 100 citations each, and an h-index of 42, well above the usual bar for a keep. The recent news stories linked above give some color to the article but I think per  that they would be better omitted; his past addictions are not what makes him notable. For the same reason perhaps it would be appropriate to |courtesy blank this AfD after it is closed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BLP||WP:CBLANK)

Comment: clearly meets  "The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work" his google scholar https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=aOjJHEEAAAAJ&hl=en record shows a total citation count of 9000, of which the most highly cited paper has 650 citations. http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/health/academic-and-recovering-addict-in-charity-bid-1-3600844 This is a substantial piece entirely about him in the Edinburgh Evening News. I have to question whether the nominator followed the instructions at , as these sources were not difficult to find
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Citation record gives stunning pass of rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)