Deletion of Russo-Ukrainian War (2nd nomination)

Comment: This request should be speedy closed as insincere: AFD is not for disposing of article titles we dislike. It should also be closed as . To boot, it is built of false logic. “There was nothing declared,” “not in a war state” – there have been a couple hundred wars since 1945, and only about a dozen of them officially declared by any party. “It is a civilian war in Ukraine and yes, there are several parties taking part direct or indirect” – ahem, what parties? The International Criminal Court made a finding that both Crimea and the Donbas constitute an international conflict between Ukraine and the Russian Federation (so the RF left the court). “It’s political propaganda” – I know you are but what am I?&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: to '''Russian military intervention in Ukraine''' or '''Russo-Ukrainian conflict'''. Most sources don’t call it the Russo-Ukrainian War. Please read ommon name, and also . The article was originally titled the Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present), but in June 2020 it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Russo-Ukrainian_War&diff=966344316&oldid=963450266 was changed to the Russo-Ukrainian War—the proposer of this page move was sockpuppet of
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:POVNAME)

Comment: and recommend ''' close'''. The topic clearly passes , as it has received in-depth coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. This is not redundant to War in Donbas; this article includes the annexation of Crimea (which is not a part of the War in Donabas) and the two topics are not equivalents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:GNG)

Comment: Clearly notable, per , as it has received significant coverage. A request to move would be more appropriate for what you've proposed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)