Deletion of Chris Garcia

Comment: Having been "a director of the historic civil rights-era Federal agency Minority Business Development Agency" could get him into Wikipedia if he could be |reliably sourced over  ''for'' it, but it is not an automatic notability freebie that ''exempts'' him from having to receive media coverage. But this is excessively dependent on |primary sources that cannot support notability at all, and the few sources that are actually media coverage are not ''about'' him substantively enough to give him the "notable because media coverage exists" treatment (which has context and depth and range and volume tests, and is ''not'' instantly passed by every single news article that happens to have a person's name present in it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: the position fails , and the sourcing of the article doesn't show he has independent notability or is even well covered generally per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: his position doesn't meet  or , a resume like article with COI issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: he was ''short-term and acting'' head of a ''sub''-cabinet level agency. That does |not convey automatic notability. Nor does being the first Latinx convey automatic notability. The |coverage is neither significant nor ongoing. He basically |made the news one news cycle for having resigned. To be blunt, so many Trump officials have resigned that resigning as he did |so common as to prove the banality of evil and to require Rachel Maddow to build a wall bigger that what Trump has proposed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:MILL)