Deletion of One Love Party (2nd nomination)

Comment: I was pretty optimistic when reading through the article as it's better presented and more substantial than the last time we discussed it but despite it's promising appearance the subject still isn't notable. Take the list of sources. Remove the primary sources. Remove the sources that could be considered pure "Ankit Love self-promotion". Remove the less reliable sources from minor and local blogs and magazines. All remaining sources either simply record the fact the party exists and contests elections (Electoral Commission, London Elects) or mentions the party in passing as part of normal electoral coverage (BBC News, The Guardian, Newsweek). Having gone through this notability discussion several times previously, I'll keep it simple: If you want to show the party is notable find a single article in a major British newspaper that directly discusses the impact of the One Love Party as it's central subject and then maybe we can establish a claim to notability here. Such an article hasn't been presented because such an article doesn't exist because the party is not notable. They don't even meet |general notability. The assertions (and for the most part, they are simply assertions) that the party is notable hold zero ground. Notorious, perhaps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: My reasons for deletion in the previous Afd remain valid - this is not a serious political party but a means for self promotion by a narcissist. |Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. There is some coverage in  but this is to be expected during an election campaign as the nominator has stated. Besides, if you invent flamboyant, outrageous policies solely for the purpose of getting attention, you will succeed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMOTION||WP:RS)