Deletion of Edward Tobinick

Comment: per nom.  Fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: and '''cleanup''' to meet  guidelines. Seems notable enough, per Peripitus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Doesn't meet  or . Patent holders are a dime-a-dozen. Pubmed shows three hits under http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Search&itool=pubmed_Abstract&term=%22Tobinick+E%22%5BAuthor%5D Tobinick EL and four hits under http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Search&itool=pubmed_Abstract&term=%22Tobinick+EL%22%5BAuthor%5D Tobinick E. Of these seven, only the http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=639228&query_hl=9&itool=pubmed_docsum 1978 study involved collaboration with truly well-published researchers. The http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=3630884&query_hl=10&itool=pubmed_docsum 1987 hit appears to be a review article and the http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14741070&query_hl=9&itool=pubmed_docsum 2004 hit appears to be a letter to the editor... neither are "research". Of the other four referring to etanercept, two were case reports (both n=2), one was a review of 20 charts, and the other was a review of 143 charts... all from his private practice. This is '''not''' impressive for someone who has been "actively involved in research and teaching for years" as some of the Google hits state
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)