Deletion of List of freeways in Michigan

Comment: One man's "roadcruft" is another man's useful information.  is relevant here; the fact there is no  is |not relevant to whether or not this should be kept or deleted. The category does ''not'' fill the need, because having a roadway that has, say, a two-mile freeway stretch on a 200-mile road (just to give an example of what I'm thinking about) in a freeways category would not be . While this list does need referencing and cleanup, |that is not what AfD is for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP||WP:OTHERCRAP||WP:ALLORNOTHING||WP:DEFINING||WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: Clearly defined list of notable entries. The arguement for "keep the category only" fail 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: as valid index of articles per  and as complement to the category per ; we don't delete lists just because categories cover the same subject. Particularly where this list clearly has more information than just the alphabetized article names, which is all the category can provide. There ''are'' other such lists for states, but it appears that there is not yet standardization in this area so they're harder to find (e.g., California Freeway and Expressway System, North Carolina Highway System are styled more as articles with incorporated lists of this kind). So this is an area that needs further development. Lastly, "roadcruft" does not even merit a response as it is not an argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:NOTDUP)