Deletion of Scams in India

Comment: wow, over 300 citations! You don't see that at AfD every day. Horribly  and non-encyclopaedic. So biased as to almost read like an attack page and falls foul of . Not helped that the subject looks to be already dealt with much better at Corruption in India. Maybe put a rediect in to that page but definitely lose this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:ADVOCACY)

Comment: per . I was the "one more editor" referred to in the nomination statement. The article is a entirely conjecture at this point, it muddles up different problems with the title of "scam" -- a sex scandal, a mosque-temple issue, corruption, political obfuscation etc etc. It doesn't help that a good chunk of the content was removed to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scams_in_India&diff=413727160&oldid=413663776 To avod (sic) deletion , removing the root causes to be incorporated later. A list is feasible on scams, but it needs to have a definite criteria, not a jamboree of anything you can find, and definitely this article and its history are not starting points. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)