Deletion of NESARA conspiracy theory (second nomination)

Comment: Lack of |references for this topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Although the concept is absurd, it's better known than the other NESARA article.  And http://www.quatloos.com Quatloos, which ''is'' a  about other matters, has a forum and FAQ about it.  &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The article is irrelevant to wikipedia and fails #OTHOUGHT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as nominated. The article has  issues. Although it has some links which point out the “hooey”, i.e. http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/crime/story/5835335p-5196095c.html do we need to write an article for every Snopes.com hoax entry that goes against the basis of |Wikipedia's hoax guideline? And also, per :  ''That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia.'' - and this hoax is non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:HOAX||WP:NOT)

Comment: per nom, and delete the NESARA article as well, which seems to have even fewer references than this one.  Coverage of the story by one newspaper doesn't make the subject notable by Wikipedia otability|notability standards.  I have nominated the NESARA article as well -- see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Economic Stabilization And Recovery Act (third nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)