Deletion of YellowAnt (software)

Comment: A  article on a software start-up, describing their package's features and payment options. The provided references are poor (the two sentences in VCCircle being the best) and my searches are not finding better. The choices of technology or any potential for future sales are propositional and do not demonstrate achieved notability. Fails  if considered as a company (why does it link in the article to Atlassian?) and  if considered as their product
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (:WP:SPA||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:NSOFT)

Comment: Nihlus Kryik, You are trying to predict the future, why would you do that? In a years time, the product could be used by 10million people. You can't predict the future, so your statement: ''it will fail  each and every time.'' is baseless. All these startups bring new thinking and new technologies and WP needs them to stay salient in the tech sector article space
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT)

Comment: Fails , and per policy does not inherit the notability of it's creating company. Lack of sourcing is also an issue
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT)