Deletion of Jake Hanrahan

Comment: Focus on the CONTENT not the CONTRIBUTOR, alright folks? I have removed several personal attacks that were entirely unnecessary. Please |assume good faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: Subject is notable. The citations which existed in the page may not have been enough to prove notability, but I found quite a few more citations which I have added to the page, and I think that it does pass  now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Obviously, there are lots of reliable sources covering his detention in the Turkish prison (https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/04/world/europe/turkey-vice-news-journalists-released.html New York Times, https://worldcrunch.com/world-affairs/exclusive-why-turkey-arrested-two-foreign-journalists World Crunch, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/sep/06/vice-news-journalists-hanrahan-pendlebury-turkey-uk-return Guardian), but he's also pretty clearly notable as a journalist, writing for The Guardian, the Independent, Vice, and Wired. Most importantly, he worked on ProPublica's https://www.propublica.org/article/atomwaffen-division-inside-white-hate-group original https://www.propublica.org/article/california-murder-suspect-atomwaffen-division-extremist-hate-group investigation into the Atomwaffen Division. Their team's documentaries won an https://www.propublica.org/atpropublica/propublica-and-frontline-win-emmy-for-documenting-hate-documentaries Emmy and an https://www.propublica.org/atpropublica/documenting-hate-documentary-honored-with-alfred-i-dupont-columbia-university-award Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Award, which qualifies as "significant critical attention" under . He is also widely cited by his peers, being a https://www.losangelesblade.com/2019/08/19/garden-grove-high-school-students-salute-hitler-sing-nazi-marching-song/ consultant for CBS News and reguarly quoted in news articles and the like.https://www.rt.com/uk/444579-graham-phillips-banned-twitter/https://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-deletes-popular-front/https://www.thedefensepost.com/2018/08/22/interview-jake-hanrahan-popular-front-modern-warfare/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Fear_and_Loathing_on_the_Oche/WmQMDgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Jake+Hanrahan%22+journalist&pg=PT47&printsec=frontcover
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: Fails  and . While ''The Guardian'' is reliable coverage, it is just one news article, no evidence of sustained or in-depth coverage. There's another source https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/sep/08/vice-news-journalist-turkey-arrest-one-of-my-most-traumatic-experiences-ever here about his arrest, but  then applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NJOURNALIST||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Journalist respected by conflict researchers. Has published multiple articles with Wiredhttps://www.wired.co.uk/profile/jake-hanrahan and Propublicahttps://www.propublica.org/people/jake-hanrahan. Played a major part in co-creating coverage of far right group Atomwaffen members in active duty American military service. Shared byline on original Propublica articles onehttps://www.propublica.org/article/atomwaffen-division-inside-white-hate-group and twohttps://www.propublica.org/article/atomwaffen-division-hate-group-active-duty-military. Spawned articles in major outlets like PBS https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/inside-a-neo-nazi-group-with-members-tied-to-the-u-s-military/n and provoked backlash from the far right groups as documented in ABChttps://abcnews.go.com/US/justice-department-announces-nationwide-arrests-members-neo-nazi/story?id=69239957. This should satisfy clause 3 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALIST)

Comment: please avoid |''ad hominem'' attacks against the nominator. Whatever RolandR may think politically, at issue are notability guidelines. There is no evidence that RolandR is politically motivated in his nomination, and such accusations should not be made lightly and without evidence. You can contribute more productively to discussion by citing wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates|relevant guidelines, and providing |reliable, in-depth & independent sources sources. Also, RolandR is correct in saying that IBT is unreliable, see its entry on our list of Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources|perennially discussed sources which states "There is consensus that the International Business Times is generally unreliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:ADHOMINEM||WP:IRS)

Comment: IMO this is still a BLP1E. There's a lot of sourcing for his kidnapping, but other mentions of him are poor. Just publishing in reliable sources doesn't make one notable. I don't have experience with conflict journalism, so if users can substantiate the claims that he is a well known combat journalist, I will happily strike my vote. As far as the sources on the talk page go, the first is a 15 minute interview, which is not independent. The same for that interview in ''The Defense Post''. Reclaim The Net doesn't seem to be a reliable source. I don't see ''The Guardian'' article mentioning Hanrahan and ''The Daily Dot'' quotes him as the founder of Popular Front. I highly doubt that the Freelance Journalists Union is independent. Unsure about ''Format Magazine''... The only claim to pass  is the reporting cited by
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NJOURNALIST)