Deletion of Singlish vocabulary (2nd nomination)

Comment: and clean up. Plenty of scholarly literature on this subject. For example, after a quick search I found chapter 4 "Discourse and Lexis" in http://www.amazon.com/Singapore-English-Dialects-David-Deterding/dp/0748625453#reader_0748625453 Singapore English by David Deterding. I agree that we should probably lose the list of words, as that is more Wiktionary's area, but there is plenty of scope here for an article that doesn't violate . In fact, it's probably about time someone |split the vocabulary section off from the main Singlish article and moved it here, as that article is more than 100k already
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD||WP:SPLIT)

Comment: Survived a 2006 AFD, somehow, but doesn't meet our modern expectations.  From , "Wikipedia is not a dictionary or a slang, jargon or usage guide."  But that's exactly what this is, a slang dictionary and guide.  Our article on Singlish already provides quite a bit of detail on slang construction, as well as the history and general grammar of the creole.  That this is largely unreferenced, and leans very heavily on a single, specific source where it ''is'' referenced, are also points against retention.  Most of the 2006 Keep !votes were variations on  and .  That may be true, but it still doesn't meet inclusion standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:ITSUSEFUL)