Deletion of Nemesysco

Comment: Excellent analysis by Adamant1. The references do not appear to contain sufficient |independent content, fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: I'm puzzled by the suggestion that there are not enough sources to meet the notability threshold, especially when this relatively short article already has 11 independent sources cited. The very first one, for instance, is an academic journal article, and its treatment of Nemesysco can hardly be considered "passing." The article is an analysis of the reliability of Nemesysco products, and it uses the word "Nemesysco" 15 times. The article from ''Science'' also checks all the boxes for the  notability guidelines. I'd be disinclined to change my vote unless someone can explain to me what is wrong with those two sources, at the very least
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: all the coverage is trivial. Including the analysis of their products.  clearly states that the person who is writing about the product had to try it themselves and it seems like none of the sources did. For instance while the academic journal article does mention Nemesysco and their products multiple times, it is only in the context of quoting company press releases about those products. Therefore, the source is not reliable. The same also goes for the other sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)