Deletion of ActiveState

Comment: How the article is written is not a notability criteria. The company is one of the largest supporting open source development. Between its editor, IDE and language support it is likely to gerner GNG support. A quick search reveals several articles on ActiveState: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3137208/open-source-tools/activestate-adds-enterprise-editions-of-ruby-node-go-and-lua.html http://www.itprotoday.com/management-mobility/sophos-sell-activestate https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/14/activestate_buys_teen_programmer/ https://www.geekwire.com/2011/seattle-area-15yearold-sells-startup-company-activestate/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/reuvencohen/2012/12/05/hp-unveils-cloud-application-platform-powered-by-activestate/#45c834f53943 The following mostly discuss their products, but the company is also discussed, and this is the inverse of  https://www.infoworld.com/article/3197414/machine-learning/activestates-python-taps-intel-mkl-to-speed-data-science-and-machine-learning.html https://sdtimes.com/activestate/komodo-ide-10-2-arrives-slack-yarn-support-improved-unit-testing/ https://sdtimes.com/activepython/activestate-updates-activepython-tdd/ https://adtmag.com/articles/2017/04/04/activepython-release.aspx https://appdevelopermagazine.com/4574/2016/11/1/LUA,-NodeJS,-Ruby,-and-Go-get-open-source-enterprise-support-from-ActiveState/. If this is kept, which I would argue it should be, Fastly should be the one to improve the article for not doing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:NOTINHERITED||:WP:BEFORE)