Deletion of Freehold and Howell Plank Road

Comment: We need to use a bit of common sense when evaluating historical topics, rather than expect them to have loads of sources readily available from a Google search. We have enough reliable sources already to be able to maintain a useful short article (and please let's not have the kneejerk reaction of a cry of "" - that essay doesn't apply here), and a major road established by state legislation will undoubtably have much more coverage in archives that are not readily available online. Oakshade sums up the situation well, except that I must point out that electricity has been around since about 10–12 seconds after the Big Bang
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: I imagine if WP was around in 1860 (along with the internet and electricity) and this went up for AfD, it would be a speedy keep with comments like "are you kidding?  It's one of the main roads of the state!".  As the Bushranger said, |Notability is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: Notable turnpike, squeaks past GNG. http://books.google.com/books?ei=_GBoUdqKIYbm9ASL8YDICw&id=h6IiAQAAMAAJ&dq=%22Freehold+and+Howell+Plank+Road%22&q=%22Freehold+and+Howell%22#search_anchor, http://books.google.com/books?ei=BGFoUbyxFoHC9gSD8YHACw&id=0ryfAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22Freehold+and+Howell+Plank+Road%22&q=%22Freehold+and+Howell%22#search_anchor. |Notability is not temporary, even when that notability was 120 years ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)