Deletion of Asticlian Gambit

Comment: or '''merge''' to List of Dungeons & Dragons modules per above comments since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: as reception in two secondary source has been discovered, the miniumum suggested by . As far as I can see, several deletion votes have not said why these secondary sources should not be preserved. That said, I would obviously prefer a merge over deletion. At least the reception section would be there to preserve
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: based on a review of the sources, fails . Fine with a merge/redirect, just not a standalone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of Dungeons & Dragons modules, sources currently in the article fail , but there is enough to warrant a merge instead of a redirect
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)