Deletion of Inner Party (3rd nomination)

Comment: this is easily one of the most important works of literature, and I'm even willing to guess that there's ''something'' out there that isn't just unreliable sources. In the long run, I might recommend covering this in some sort of Glossary of 1984, as I suspect that there is more research about the overall impact of 1984 on our language than there are sources that deep-dive individually into each concept. But there is nothing reliable in this article to , and even an article that shows  would need to have the bare minimum of reliable sources, which this does not. I sadly agree with Piotrus that other related articles are even worse shape
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: As stated by the nom, while it comes up in searches, its basically only mentioned as part of wider discussions of the plot or analysis of 1984 as a whole, and does not have enough coverage or analysis on itself, specifically, that would warrant a .  The basic plot elements are already covered on the main Nineteen Eighty-Four article already.  I would not be opposed to a Redirect, though, if other users think this might be a useful search term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)

Comment: How many fingers am I holding up?  That's the number of times that this page has been dragged here to Room 101 for a Two Minutes Hate before it is dropped down the memory hole.  But we still don't love Big Brother and so the result is always Keep.  That's because you need to know these things to be literate and so these tropes belong here.  The details of how this is done is not important per .  And all the other usual policies and guidelines still apply: , ; ; ; &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER||WP:ATD||WP:NEXIST||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:PRESERVE)