Deletion of List of Brazilian footballers (3rd nomination)

Comment: per above. Please don't waste our time in the future with deletion nominations that don't address prior deletion results or relevant guidelines. The whole discussion in the prior AFD was about the complementary function of lists and categories per , on which basis the list was kept by overwhelming consensus. It would be one thing to expressly disagree with that result and give reasons why we should come to a different outcome notwithstanding the very clear guideline language, but you've failed to even show awareness of either the guideline or the content of the prior AFD while raising an argument it rebutted and rejected five years ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: per , "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative. Furthermore, arguing that a category duplicates a list (or vice versa) at a deletion discussion is not a valid reason for deletion and should be avoided
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:NOTDUP)

Comment: and tighten the inclusion criteria. The case for the categories existing fails .  This is part of a bigger series of :Category:Lists of association football players by nationality and the links within {{tl|Association football players
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)