Deletion of Mamaboy

Comment: per meeting | (paragraph 2). Come on {{u|teb728|nominator}}, it '''does''' meet inclusion criteria of  for completed and yet unreleased film, and even the most minimal of  shows the topic of this  MOS:FILM#Productiion|film's production as eminently meeting |notability for a completed film:  http://saccityexpress.com/three-local-talents-play-primary-roles-in-sacramento-filmed-movie-mamaboy/#sthash.FM2jcXGb.dpbs ''Sac Lake Express'', http://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/movies-news-reviews/article39770919.html ''Sacramento Bee'', http://www.arcurrent.com/arts-culture/2015/10/21/mamaboy-explores-gender-swap-pregnancy/ ''American River Current'', http://www.abc10.com/story/entertainment/2015/10/13/busey-hollywood-el-dorado-interview/73722258/ ''ABC 10 News'', http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2015/10/06/high-school-comedy-movie-filming-locally-features.html ''Sacramento Business Journal'', http://www.sacbee.com/entertainment/movies-news-reviews/article39322188.html ''Sacramento Bee'', https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mamaboy%22&tbm=nws and more.  This should '''never''' have been brought to AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:NRVE)