Deletion of Great Fox

Comment: unless some suitable merge target can be found. Too long to be included in the main 'Star Fox' article. Might go in a 'List of Star Fox ships' if there is such a thing, but otherwise fine where it is. Wikipedia is not paper. We have room to organize articles in a logical manner rather than cramming everything onto one page. Nom seems like . Et cetera - same issues as the other dozen articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: This article is pure gamecruf, completely failing , this should not have been brought back in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Article wholly lacking any |reliably sourced claims to real-world |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: regardless of any bad faith, this article needs to be terminated (per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: See  (or the more stable ) - articles on fiction need reliable, secondary sources.  I don't see any of that, and articles that are derived solely from the original fictional work can only restate the OT#PLOT|plot or |engage in original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: per nom and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)