Deletion of 2032 Summer Olympics (3rd nomination)

Comment: If the Keep proponents don't AGREE with WP:CRYSTAL, they should go to the  talk page to attempt to sway consensus to overturn the policy; AfD is not the venue to do that.  But that aside, it troubles me to see the number of people whose vote so blatantly is "I don't give a damn about Wikipedia policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  also "expressed interest in" is not the same as making an actual bid and so there will be all manner of speculation until then. All manner of things may intervene between now and then - for example there were Olympics scheduled for 1940 and 44 that did not occur. This articles time will come in a decade or so it can be resurrected then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The bidding process has not even begun (the article linked to some discussions, but that is just ). Further, there is nothing to even say about it. There is no compelling reason to keep this article. -- Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SPECULATION)

Comment: agree with comments that once bids are actually being accepted by the IOC, then it avoids any  concerns, because at the point the IOC has decided that the games for that year will indeed be held
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)