Deletion of Kitten (porn star) (2nd nomination)

Comment: No coverage in |reliable sources seems to indicate there's nothing to cover. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Kitten passes . The nomination is playing primary and secondary criteria of WP:BIO against each other. Kitten's contributions to porn are credibly acknowledged with the AVN nomination. Current consensus is that such people are of interest and that article stubs will get expanded eventually. And that is usually good enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: Please read the talk page discussion that led to this AfD. The single AVN nomination is the only reed to lean on and it's a weak one.  helps define |notability in biographies of pornographic actors. In itself though, it's not dispositive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:N)