Deletion of Rob Capriccioso (2nd nomination)

Comment: I note that Torrenceg and Dcwash are recently created accounts with very small numbers of edits, who have apparently stumbled onto this discussion despite never participating in an AfD before.  While |good faith is assumed, participants are reminded that it is against Wikipedia policy to canvass for votes (), operate multiple accounts () or contribute to a discussion a friend is involved in so as to create the illusion of a wide range of agreeing viewpoints (also 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:CANVASS||WP:SOCK||WP:SOCK)

Comment: Reasoning as follows: (1) The article is required to pass the test at  of "significant coverage in reliable independent sources".  While the article cites many sources, they are mostly not ''about'' Capriccioso but rather ''by'' him (and are therefore neither signifcant coverage ''of'' the topic, nor independent).  Those sources not by him do not mention him by name.  (2) The article claims Capriccioso is a four time winner of the Native American Journalists Association media awards.  Generally winners of notable awards are assumed to be themselves notable.  However, while the NAJA is a notable organisation, I can find no evidence that this particular award is a notable award.  (3) For the above reasons I can find no evidence that this journalist is notable within the Wikipedia meaning of notability and the page should accordingly be deleted. (Also, for what it's worth, I see no conflict of interest problems in Awiseman's contributions above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)