Deletion of Dogsbite.org

Comment: The whole pro-pitbull/anti-pitbull debate is not a mainstream topic (even though passionately polarized) and the article is about one bit player. There is not ''sufficient coverage'' to maintain a |NPOV, therefore the article is a |not notable topic. The article was originally created as a  criticism, and despite edits to migrate towards NPOV, it continues to veer off of NPOV towards criticism with every other edit. Is there  with editors, or is the subject simply not sufficiently notable to attract editors with more NPOVs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NN||WP:G10||WP:COI)

Comment: Subject covered by multiple independent reliable sources in a non-trivial manner, meeting . Article content reflects the reliable sources and is not an attack page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)