Deletion of VanArts

Comment: Notability is not at question here. Article fulfills Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion|deletion policy per reason 4: "Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)". I believe given the current state of the article and how intertwined uncited sources are within the article, it should be subject to  at the minimum. If the article is stubbed or edited to the point where it is largely verifiable, I will change my position. However, I don't  believe that is possible and it is better to start from scratch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Lack of sources or promotional tone are not valid reasons for deletion. Cited issues can be fixed by editing or stubifying. Accredited post-secondary schools are generally considered notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)