Deletion of Peter Zed

Comment: doesn't pass  or . WIPO issue ( if we're only relying on that), if it's significant enough, can be included elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Does not, in my opinion, meet . It is full of unsourced biographical material such as the claimed 2009 incident involving a panic attack and counterfeit watches and sometime reads like a press release. It also bothers me that the original editor, who is also the subject, seems to be creating source material such as the recently added http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=ea_article&sid=49452 Wikipedia and the Adult Industry: A Beginners Guide which is simply an editorial about Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per , .  Ridiculous puffy vanity autobio of the sort that we (thankfully) don't see much of on Wikipedia anymore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: WP:BIO requires that the facts in the article be |verifiable.  The cited sources do not verify the facts in the article- in fact, none of the cited sources, as far as I can tell, is a |article about Peter Zed from a reliable source.  I was not able to find any articles about Peter Zed with my own google search, either.  Of course, I have no objection to recreation of the article if and when somewhere, a few significant sources write about him in a significant way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Does not appear to meet |general notability guideline, and several of the sources do not appear to correspond to their citations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)