Deletion of Bikroy.com

Comment: The third most recognized internet site (and a top-20 website by traffic) in a country of 160 million people not-notable? I don't think so. The article satisfies , citing multiple, reliable, independent sources containing significant coverage: https://web.archive.org/web/20130512011506/http://www.banglanews24.com/English/detailsnews.php?nssl=b8d22572681798f5658571ff652ca32f, http://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-255820, and https://web.archive.org/web/20121221084521/http://www.prothom-alo.com:80/detail/date/2012-12-17/news/313970. A quick search returns plenty more: http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/03/22/24776, http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/07/01/42445, http://www.thedailystar.net/our-market-players-43113, http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/09/29/58833, http://www.thedailystar.net/business/bikroycom-among-top-3-internet-sites-survey-73991, http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2015/12/09/123738, http://print.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2016/06/11/143775, and http://www.thedailystar.net/bytes/interviews/Bikroy-more-than-online-classifieds-site-1307005, for example. Time would be better spent improving the article rather than trying to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: ping|Pyrusca}} Sometimes the nominator can save everyone time by reconsidering a nomination that was made without a thorough enough . Withdrawing it would make a |speedy keep possible
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:SK)