Deletion of Harold Eckert (2nd nomination)

Comment: Strange as it may sound, considering I AFD'd this guy before. But, my reasons for keep are numerous: He spent considerable time at Triple-A (part/all of six seasons, four in US Triple-A) and I am willing to lend more credence to those who play a while at that level. He was covered a lot in the book ''http://books.google.com/books?id=ZsUbSbpT5AUC&pg=PA75&lpg=PA75&dq=%22Harold+Eckert%22&source=bl&ots=dPYJsy7b1c&sig=zY_CkXluavMmfLfjpS2rS78AFEQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=72xuVKvBHJecygTD8YLgDg&ved=0CDMQ6AEwBDge#v=onepage&q=%22Harold%20Eckert%22&f=false When Baseball Returned to Brooklyn'' and he earned considerable mention in ''http://books.google.com/books?id=O3tNRExcr2IC&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=%22Harold+Eckert%22&source=bl&ots=yzKS1ErrC7&sig=oHFDWkjxL2SN2MGe7d8ospEwwjo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=72xuVKvBHJecygTD8YLgDg&ved=0CEQQ6AEwCTge#v=onepage&q=%22Harold%20Eckert%22&f=false The Brooklyn Cyclones''. The ''New York Post'' gave him a full feature here: http://nypost.com/2001/08/05/cyclones-career-a-real-roller-coaster/ and he was one of the focal points http://search.proquest.com/docview/388126597?pq-origsite=summon here. He had http://search.proquest.com/docview/437806068?pq-origsite=summon this entire article dedicated to him. He also had articles dedicated to him titled ''Eckert shining despite saga'' and ''Eckert's time with 51s might be done'', but unfortunately I can't get the text for them. There's also http://www.eluniversal.com/2006/02/04/beisc_art_04303A this and http://www.baseball.it/leggi_articolo.asp?id=18530 this. He more than passes . (More is out there, but I think what I've posted is sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)