Deletion of Green with Evil

Comment: How am I supposed to know that this is "what started...craze"?  Without reliable sources, I can't have a good reason to believe it; and saying "Don't delete because there might be sources" is akin to using a |crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BALL)

Comment: Highly notable as arguably what started the whole Power Rangers craze. Remember: just because you can't find/don't look for |verifiable |reliable sources doesn't mean they don't exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: The claims of importance need references and they just aren't there - if the claims were true, they would be. This looks like an |essay and |original research. The excessive plot summary which follows is in contradiction of "|a plot summary may be appropriate ... but should never become the dominant aspect of an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY||WP:OR||WP:PLOT)

Comment: Notable episode(s) of a notable television series. Right now the content is solely about the plot, but that can be fixed |given time and sources exist out there somewhere. The nominator just has his own ideals as to what can and cannot be used as a reliable source which he does not give others the chance to investigate (if he actually does look for them). I don't see how  has anything to do with this deletion, because this is about something that has already happened
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE||WP:BALL)

Comment: I did searches through multiple archival databases but unfortunately was unable to find discussion in reliable sources to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)