Deletion of Nyala Rinpoche

Comment: with a recommendation to close with no consensus and a strong suggestion that work is needed to address the question of whether notability can be verified via his multiple names and to contact the relevant wikiprojects to do some more upgrades.  We have one of those individuals where sourcing falls mostly pre-internet but post 1923 so source material is not easy to locate, and in particular for Tibet post-1949 due to the upheaval in that nation at the time.  This is a pretty good case of where a  is needed by people knowledgable in the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: C'mon. He was the teacher of someone notable and he was elderly. He might have been especially elderly but that far-fetched claim is not verifiable in the way we define |verifiablity. Even if taken in the very best light, this sentence"If Rinpoche were to have been born in 1826, as is claimed by some, he would have been far older than the oldest man ever documented suggests pretty strongly that this subject fails our requirements for a claim of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: Many thanks to {{u|Lemongirl942}} for actually rolling up her sleeves and assessing the ''sources we have'' rather than posturing over ones that hypothetically may or may not exist. We simply cannot |verify anything about this person and I don't think there is a realistic prospect of us doing so any time soon. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)