Deletion of List of tallest buildings in Fuzhou

Comment: Bottom line, this isn't referenced to reliable sources, and a quick web search didn't offer up much for me, either. So that's it, right? Well... I'm nervous about arguing for deletion here, on the grounds of |systemic bias. The project has a longstanding practice of accepting these tallest-building lists in places where building heights and history are easily sourced to web-accessible, English-language media. And I think we are right to do so, because Wikipedia ''is'' a gazetteer. |"Sources must exist!" is explicitly an argument to avoid... but |I think sometimes it is the right one to make. Large-city media operations discuss their city's skyline. It is news when major buildings are constructed, and completed. I'd accept those statements as virtual axioms. The principle behind  is that we should check for ''likely'' sources before deletion. And here, the likely sources are from the ''Fuzhou Daily'', ''Fuzhou Evening News'', ''Southeast Express'', and ''Strait News'': the four major newspapers in the city. None of these news organizations has an English-language web presence. I can't even ''pretend'' to read Chinese, and Google Translate's skill with the language is deeply inadequate for this sort of task. Heck, I'm not even confident of my ability to identify what website goes with which outlet. I ''think'' http://www.hxnews.com/ this is the ''Strait News'' and http://www.fznews.com.cn/ this is the ''Fuzhou Daily''; I can't identify with certainty websites for the other two (if they are even extant publications). Whether they have searchable online archives is ''far'' beyond my capacity to judge. If the goal here is to determine that these tallest-building lists need to be re-evaluated for project inclusion as a general principle, that needs an RFC, not an AFD; if the problem is ''this'' list, I'm simply unwilling to advocate for deletion until someone with access to the appropriate sources (and the required fluency to evaluate them) can pass judgment
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:SOURCESMUSTEXIST||WP:IAR||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The nominator's correct the current article sourcing isn't great, but Fuzhou is in the top 100 in the world for most skyscrapers https://www.emporis.com/statistics/most-skyscraper-cities-worldwide. Since this is ultimately a language issue, I'm actually going to make a  argument: there must be sources in Chinese that would get this past  on the basis it's similar to other cities which have properly sourced lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:GNG)