Deletion of Constitutional republic (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fringe, POV-pushing article as written, based on a few obscure opinion sources. Fails  too with a fair bit of unsourced text interpolating between its meager references; the best example of this is the pargraph trying to prove--without any secondary sources--that "The notion of the constitutional republic originates with Aristotle's Politics". (What's next? An article called the greatest country, because there are sources like http://www.forbes.com/sites/garyshapiro/2012/07/25/is-america-the-greatest-country-in-the-world/ http://www.businessinsider.com/why-america-is-not-the-greatest-country-in-the-world-2012-6 and I can find the phrase in Google Books too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I can understand the AfD nom, believe it was made in |good faith and I think as the article stands a ''Delete'' argument could certainly be made. The term, though, outside of the US, has been and is fairly widely used and there are a number of sources which could be cited. Could the article do with improvement? Certainly. Is deletion justified? I contend, not. Part of the problem seems to be that the article is written from an entirely US perspective. Widened to include other countries and other political discussions in those countries, references can be found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:GOODFAITH)