Deletion of MVPMods

Comment: fails , http://www.google.com/search?q=mvpmods&hl=en&lr=&start=100&sa=N 715 Ghits, Alexa in the 90,000 ballpark. Ahem
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: as article fails to satisfy the inclusin criteria per . The fact it has been reviewed in one magazine does not satisfy ''The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.'' I buy Computer Shopper monthly, which reviews hundreds of hardware, software, and websites every month. Because they were reviewed in the March issue, should we have articles on DVDit, Sony Vegas Movie Studio, Linux Standard, Alk, Sketch recognition, or Scratch-Less Disc Industries? No, because |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and articles must meet the inclusion criteria per  - e.g. ''Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.'' - or  if about a website. Should we have articles on Windows Messenger, MSN Messenger, Google Talk, ICQ, Skype, GAIM, Crucial, Kingston Technology|Kingston, Lexar, PNY, Sandisk, Navicore, TomTom (company)|Tomtom, Mio Technology|Mio, and Garmin? Yes, and all these products/companies ''are'' included because the content of the articles can be verified by ''several'' non-trivial published works or have been published by reputable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOT||WP:VERIFY||WP:WEB)

Comment: Actually, I like a little immaturity. ;-)  The site is the kind of thing you like if you like that kind of thing, but an Alexa ranking of 91,836 and no assertion in the article of anything that would meet the  criteria means this one is '''going, going, gone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)