Deletion of Joshua Brandwood

Comment: as .  This article reminded me of a Harvard student who made a flurry many years ago being the youngest legislator in New Hampshire, so I googled, he popped right up: http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2006/10/31/next-state-rep-this-one-wears/. (he appears not to have won, to have been the youngest candidate merely, memory is fallible) Actually, a lot of "youngest elected" hits pop up in a quick search: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/22/youngest-legislators-america_n_6680330.html, http://granitegrok.com/blog/2015/05/republican-dean-bailey-becomes-one-of-the-youngest-women-elected-to-nh-house.  I say, more power to them.   However, looking at my news google search on Joshua Brandwood https://www.google.com/search?q=joshua+brandwood&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=joshua+brandwood&tbm=nws persuades me that being the "youngest" elected is not the same as having enough notability to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)

Comment: Youngest person ever to hold an otherwise non-notable office" is not, in and of itself, a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia — ''every'' single municipal council on this entire planet will ''always'' have had its own youngest-ever member, as well as the lingering possibility of a new even-younger member coming along in the future to outyouth the first one, so it's a total non-starter as evidence of ''encyclopedic'' notability in and of itself. And that goes ''double'' if you have to park the article ''entirely'' on |primary source verification of his existence rather than |reliable source coverage of his ''work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCE||WP:RS)