Deletion of Displacement (psiology, parapsychology, psychical science)

Comment: no third party sources to establish notability -- only sources (and few enough of them) are from  journals
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Article describes specific usage of term within parapsychology literature. The usage is demonstrated by a range of references, so is clearly not a neologism. Other arguments for deletion reduce to . This terminology may be specific to one community, but that does not make it unencylopedic. The phenomenon that it describes may be a statistical artefact, but that does not make it unencyclopedic either. It could bear some re-writing for greater clarity, but that is not grounds for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)