Deletion of Pre-Madonna 2

Comment: per obvious notability. I gave Pre-Madonna#References|8 sources which cover all of the information in the article, including a dedicated segment from ''Extra'' which covers the release with interviews with Bray on this album and his reasons for publishing it, two books written much later with discusses this album non-trivially, as well as several newspaper articles which cover and review the album upon its release. In addition, this is an important piece of legally published work (not a Bootleg recording|bootleg), the only one covering the early demos of Madonna, which is a particularly historically significant artist.Authors' have |a criterion which states"The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the book's author is him/herself notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather, the book's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of work would be a common study subject in literature classes." Madonna certainly qualifies under that criteria (making the appropriate replacement between literature stuff and music stuff, see Madonna Studies). In addition, the information contained in the ''Pre-Madonna'' article ''is'' relevant, encyclopedic, sourced, and cannot be merged anywhere. Therefore '''keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOKS)

Comment: I'm struggling to see why this is notable. Other than providing a track listing a lot of the other things are claimed with {{fact}} tags. There is actually very little useful information.  states that where suffificient information for detailed pages does not exist the notability aside the subject should not recieve an independent page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)