Deletion of Survivor Acquired Brain Injury

Comment: Until I'd waded through the above discussion, I hadn't realised that the intended subject of the article was ''survivor'', and not the ''injury'', as implied by the word order in the title. I've no opinion on notability, but if it continues to fail , I don't see how the article can be sustained
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: May I play devil's advocate here? I note that there are advocacy groups for those who have certain medical conditions - for example, 'little people' (dwarfism). For that matter, concepts like affirmative action, black power and nigger don't belong in the negro article. Is the author postulating that 'Survivor ABI' represents a social movement that is sufficiently separated from the concept of acquired brain injury that it cannot be said to be on the same topic? I can prove that affirmative action, black power and nigger are concepts that have had volumes of books published on them and websites devoted to them. Is 'Survivor ABI' in a similar category? The burden of proof should go on the author here, and I guess  is the appropriate policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)