Deletion of Workplace violation

Comment: I don't think this is a defined legal term.  The phrase is used fairly frequently, but in a haphazard and ill-defined manner. It is perhaps used most commonly to refer to OSHA workplace safety issues and to wage-and-salary issues.  However, it is unclear whether it relates to violation of statutes, regulations, ordinances, company policies or norms of social behavior.  Also, it is unclear whether it relates to safety, pay, drug use, etc.  Note that the references refer to "workplace" and "violat*" used somewhere in the article, but not necessarily the phrase itself and that should be notable and well-defined in its own right.  I think this fails the prohibitions against |neologism and WP being used as a #DICTIONARY|dictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NOT)

Comment: this is a Legalese|legal term of art to encompass several issues, as listed in the article. Your results may vary, but it seems to have at least a few |reliable sources. This concept is |likely to prove useful in the next four years, as employment law evolves. |I found several more sources at https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Workplace+violation%22 Google books and https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Workplace+violation%22 Google scholar. This stub needs work, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:BEFORE)