Deletion of Zaneta Wyne

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: I located https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/soccer-insider/wp/2017/10/29/uswnts-crystal-dunn-scores-twice-for-chelsea/?utm_term=.0390930ecbf9 this which would satisfy . Additionally,  indicates the Women's league she belongs to will become fully professional in 2018 which would satisfy . I don't see the point of deleting the article and waiting a very short period of time until it could be created again
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FPL||WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: per  and the fact she plays in a top-flight women's league. NFOOTY fails women athletes in the vast majority of top leagues as it only includes two one active league in the entire world - when in the real world there are more than 70 top leagues. Why aren't those leagues listed anywhere on ? One would need to look at the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Fully_professional_leagues&action=history edit history of the essay as well as https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Fully_professional_leagues who makes the additions and deletions. As for the  guideline which takes precedence over sport-specific notability essays, I'm seeing more than routine coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FPL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails |NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a |fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy |GNG. Keep votes above seem to be confusing the number of references in an article with an indication of GNG. If we look at these sources individually
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FPL||WP:GNG)