Deletion of Mithila (Nepal)

Comment: Regions" are already part of the present structure of Nepal, as described in Nepal#Subdivisions and elsewhere. Maybe the first sentence could read "Mithila (Devanagri मिथिला Tirhuta মিথিলা ) or the eastern Terai is part of southeast Nepal." Even then, the article would still look as if it's written on the assumption that the SRC proposal will carry. FN2 is a failed verification as, although it says they proposed 11 states, it only lists 10, and Mithila is only identified as part of a larger composite one. I can't read the Devanagari of FN30. The map shown in the SRC Proposal section of the article may have been created for wikipedia, but it's obviously a copy (same colour scheme, for example) of the one at FN30. Has copyright permission been obtained? The image page doesn't say so or acknowledge the source. By the way, the wikipedia version only shows 10 states, as it loses a dividing line inside the grey-brown part in the north. Now, what is the status of the map in the infobox? Is it a map showing a well-identified entity with agreed boundaries? (Citation, please, if so). Or are its boundaries those of the SRC proposal? If the latter, it's 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I have copy-edited the article (may still need some minor work) for links, grammar, and the removal of doubtful material. I have added Citation needed templates.  Perhaps some of the legendary and religious material should be removed.  I did remove the entire Genocide section, as it appears elsewhere and does not need repetition here.  Any issues with  remaining should be cited by deletion proponents. This was a poorly written and weak article, but after copy-editing and other improvements, it should be kept. Any remaining problems should be tagged, as I say they are only reasons to call for improvement, not reasons for deleting the whole article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)