Deletion of Allegations of Bias in the ABC

Comment: Clear  designed solely to drive readers to an anti-ABC blog to find out more. All three sources are to op-ed pieces, one behind a paywall. Certainly doesn't meet  by any yardstick
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:NPOV)

Comment: We do have Fox News Channel controversies, an article which might suffer from the same problem this one does, although there certainly are quite a few critics.  We have an even more extensive list of BBC controversies.  But then this is my US-centric viewpoint: my actual point is that a major, national news organization is almost certain to have critics whose views get reported in reliable sources, and the ABC probably qualifies.  And yes, : but there does seem to be precedent for an article of this kind.  My inclination is to '''move''' this to something like Australia Broadcasting Corporation controversies and '''keep''' it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: The article is a  apparently set up to attack a media organization by assembling opinions of politically motivated sources. It consists mostly of |original research by an editor who seems to have a close connection with a blog. I have attempted to clean up the article by removing potential BLP violations and content that is not supported by the sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:OR)