Deletion of Cordys (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article looks like typical corporate spam. However, on the Talk:Cordys page, in the News link that BenTels indicates, and in books such as http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OqzYhZRNsGYC&lpg=PT159&ots=oL4Ld7BXQ_&dq=%22Cordys%22&pg=PT159#v=onepage&q=%22Cordys%22&f=false BPM Excellence in Practice 2009, there's a significant number of discussions of the company and its approach, which altogether looks sufficient for . However what the article does clearly need is (a) incorporating of explicit refs and in my opinion (b) ruthless pruning of the sections on things like their user conference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:CORPDEPTH)