Deletion of Wavy the Creator

Comment: I can observe at least three reliable sources discussing subject. Per , Failure to meet any criterion listed therein doesn’t translate to the subject of the article being non notable, with 3 good sources in the article I’d say GNG is satisfied here. Furthermore @{{u|Paul Carpenter}}, in the nominator's defense, I For one who has lived in Nigeria for 20+ years can say for a fact that any Nigerian editor passing by without thoroughly vetting the article's sources would !vote a ''Delete'' in a heartbeat as subject of our discussion has almost no recognition in the Nigerian media/ Nigerian entertainment industry. I believe a COI is present in the article also
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so passes  so that deletion is unnecessary in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: having lengthy profiles in multiple magazines, https://www.vogue.com/article/shaku-shaku-nigeria-lagos-vintage-retro-wavy-the-creator-new-music-video including ''Vogue'' is enough to meet . Very little seems to be sourced to press releases, and only where appropriate. --
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Insufficient coverage in only 2 sources  ., https://www.vogue.com/article/shaku-shaku-nigeria-lagos-vintage-retro-wavy-the-creator-new-music-video including ''Vogue''   fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN , , No evidence of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: wikipedoa is not a place for irelevant topic ,  article that fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN ,  and  , upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)