Deletion of Colin Hatch

Comment: as he fails to meet any of the criteria for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: In this case, we have to consider  as well as .  At the moment, it's too early to tell if the murder of Hatch in prison will have long-term implications.  However, if anything, it may turn out that the alleged perpertrator of Hatch's murder, Damien Fowkes, is more notable in the long run, particularly in view of the earlier attack on Ian Huntley
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:VICTIM||WP:PERP)

Comment: as non-notable. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: extraordinary features as DGG states. Passing . Its not an ordinary case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: Run-of-the-mill  and  fail.  Not everyone that gets a bit of press for committing a crime gets a Wikipedia article, we're not a police blotter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per NOTNEWS. Yes, a lot of press coverage, but that is not enough: the |GNG explicitly says, in its fifth bullet point, that significant coverage is "''not a guarantee... that a subject is suitable for inclusion... For example, such an article may violate |what Wikipedia is not''" - as this does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: and/or migrate it to WikiNews. |Neither his crime, nor his murder seems to be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: don't see how he meets . we don't create articles for all murderers and even if they were murdered in jail
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)