Deletion of Jacob Wohl (3rd nomination)

Comment: I initially recommended deleting an earlier version of this article in April, 2017 but withdrew my !vote after {{u|Icewhiz}} expanded and improved the article considerably. See . Now, we have a new round of significant coverage of Wohl from the Daily Beast, the Atlantic, GQ, Vox, CNN, Slate, NBC and so on. I considered him borderline notable a year and a half ago, but he is definitely notable now. This article should be kept and the useful content from the previously deleted versions should be added back into the current article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEYMANN)

Comment: responding to ping) This is quite a different article from its last two iterations. It is focused on the one current event and I agree that per  deletion is warranted. As I was trying to find sources, I ran across this quote from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-10-31/when-ceos-call-their-companies-ugly a Bloomberg opinion piece: "I must say that I liked Jacob Wohl a lot more when he was a comical fringe figure of the financial world than I do now that he’s a comical fringe figure of alt-right politics." A fringe figure is an appropriate description for a subject not meeting notability standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as a clear pass of . Issues of balance can be addressed through editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This fellow has now applied his talents in multiple fields so it's no longer . It will be interesting to follow his accomplishments as he moves into, say, the art world or medicine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as above this is a minor fringe figure who has not been convicted of the political allegations and the financial misdemeaners were very commonplace unfortunately. There is a saying that all publicity is good publicity and this character certainly does not warrant it for his  charades, thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Even prior to the Mueller thing, he had plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jacob+Wohl%22+-wikipedia&num=50&newwindow=1&biw=1218&bih=792&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A%2Ccd_max%3A10%2F28%2F2018&tbm= Web, https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jacob+Wohl%22+-wikipedia&num=50&newwindow=1&tbs=cdr:1,cd_max:10/28/2018&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiY_PmV0bHeAhUmxVQKHSxeBiYQ_AUIDigB&biw=1218&bih=792 News, so this is not a  instance. He is a noted "pro-Trump internet troll" (''https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/business/false-flag-theory-bombs-conservative-media.html New York Times'') and "alt-right influencer" (''https://www.wired.com/story/how-liberals-amped-up-a-parkland-shooting-conspiracy-theory/ Wired''). He is notable as a '''conspiracy theorist''' and as a '''fraudulent financier'''. He is also currently under investigation by the FBI. This new article, unlike the previous iterations written by SPAs, is devoid of promotionalism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)