Deletion of List of Homer Simpson's jobs (3rd nomination)

Comment: has already passed ''two'' AfD's.  The list of jobs is significant to both the show, and to Homer Simpson himself.  The article passes  as it is covered in reliable secondary sources (albeit only two).  I would suggest adding more sources if theyre out there
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: The list has sufficient references to demonstrate that the topic is notable in our universe and so the basis of the nomination is bogus.  It seems to be a disruptive renomination based only upon 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: fails , which states that a topic needs ''substantive coverage in multiple independent reliable sources''. Note the word '''multiple'''. This article has four so-called references, three of them (from marginal sources) that make completely trivial mention of Homer's jobs. Only one article has Homer's jobs as a subject, and that only addresses his "top ten best jobs", not a complete list. But even if one accepted this article as a legitimate reference, which is doubtful, '''one''' reference is not enough to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: as  is never a valid reason for anything, but also per Wikipedia:Lists (discriminate, encyclopedic, notable, unoriginal, and verifiable) and Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning fictional topics with importance in the real world).  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: I read the previous Afd, and sorry to say, I did not see one |I LIKE IT comment. In fact all the keeps, other than two that said per above, were well thought out – logical and to the point.  Likewise, as it was during the previous |Afd the article is referenced – been continually updated since 2005, when the article first appeared, and has survived two previous fd|Afds nominations overwhelming.  '''Please read'''  Before Nominating for Afd, I provided the link for you here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Before_nominating_an_AfD,  before nominating another article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:AFD||WP:A)