Deletion of Justin Knapp (2nd nomination)

Comment: The person does appear to pass  with significant coverage from reliable sources.  Don't see how 1E applies to years of work and edits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: References are solid and easily push the article over the |general notability threshold. Not a single event per  as this was (is?) an ongoing phenomenon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:1E)

Comment: pretty straightforward case of , which makes the fact he meets the GNG irrelevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per , I do not feel BLP1E is applicable here. I believe that a million edits on Wikipedia is more akin to a body of work (such as that of an artist, like myself) than a single event.  Knapp's millionth edit may have been an event, but the million edits as a whole are something entirely different, and I find the sourcing to focus on the latter, not the former. A single example: Many articles discuss the range of topics Knapp edits in, none that I saw says what the topic of the 1,000,000th edit was. I came across this argument at the previous DRV, looked into the sources involved, and find it compelling
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: While it may not be an event that he made one million edits, it was the only thing he was covered for. So  is applicable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)