Deletion of Yandere (2nd nomination)

Comment: because what little isn't  is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:OR)

Comment: Dream Focus has been |canvassing several other editors to comment in this AfD, all but one supported keeping the article in the last AfD.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Doceirias&diff=prev&oldid=348070880http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Allen4names&diff=prev&oldid=348071199http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Juhachi&diff=prev&oldid=348071221http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moritheil&diff=prev&oldid=348071325
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)

Comment: Really just a , as noted by Farix, so normally deletion would be appropriate, however since there is the whole Glossary of anime and manga, which is of questionable appropriateness itself, merging/redirecting there seems appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF)

Comment: Much of the original article was filled with |original research which could not be |verified through |reliable sources. Once it was trimmed down to what information could be sourced, what is left is a . I'll also note that an earlier attempt to remove some of the original research was reverted the next day with no explanation or sources added
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:DICDEF)

Comment: to Glossary of anime and manga.  Not enough to make an article, adequately covered in glossary.  Leaving as article just temps more 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)