Deletion of FA Cup semi-finals

Comment: no evidence of notability, certainly does not pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are some unique features of FA Cup semi-finals, particularly with respect to venues and participation by lower or non-league clubs, which this list article explores. I say "weak keep" because it just about barely walks the line of passing  in terms of sourcing. The claim of "pro English football bias" above is a ridiculous piece of bad faith by {{u|Dougal18}} against the many editors who have contributed to the article over the years, by the way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm with the Gnome, and frankly, the notion that there are "unique" aspects about semi-finals is |complete nonsense.  The way to handle "ridiculous bloat" isn't to create kneejerk content forks.  It's to cut the bloat. ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BULLSHIT)

Comment: as per ; should be renamed ''List of FA Cup semi-finals'' in my view, however. Nomination appears to be more  more than anything
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TRIGGERED)

Comment: None of the delete votes above me have cited any policy apart from . Passes  and the statistics presented are well documented, so it's not just a blob of numbers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG)