Deletion of TheOdd1sOut

Comment: as per . There's enough out there on him and he seems to be a notable and popular cartoonist. I recommend a major overhaul and some more effort done on the article though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: I think we may disagree on what counts as "significant" and "in-depth" wrt the GNG. In my view, if multiple independent reliable sources give enough information to write a non-stub article, that's significant enough for me. Also, having lots of subscribers in and of itself isn't sufficient to indicate notability, but per , it does lend some weight. Two sources in the article, https://www.thepearlpost.com/14375/entertainment/youtuber-of-the-month-james-rallison/ https://crixeo.com/theodd1sout-comics/ look like pretty significant and in-depth coverage to me, so the only possible dispute here is reliability (note that one of these sources is a high school newspaper). The other sources in the article are more brief in coverage, but they still add support to notability: Foodbeast's articles about Sooubway https://www.foodbeast.com/news/sooubway-customers/ https://www.foodbeast.com/news/subway-animated/ https://www.foodbeast.com/news/sooubway-episode-3/ and Rare's article about sprinkles https://rare.us/rare-humor/a-youtuber-decided-to-buy-3-million-sprinkles-and-did-what-any-self-respecting-adult-would-with-all-that-power/. Is that not enough? I think it's enough, but idk I'm usually pretty lax about these things. Other than these articles, I could only find https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/youtubers-are-reading-their-own-fan-fiction-awkward.html, and a bunch of passing mentions in articles about VidCon, YouTube Rewind, and most-subscribed YouTuber lists, so eh
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)