Deletion of Kikin Inc. (2nd nomination)

Comment: I have previously worked for kikin Inc., but my relationship with the subject of the article, did not color my contributions to the article. My contributions to the article would have been no different, even if it had been some other random company that I had no connection to. I think this article has a |neutral point of view and is written in encyclopedic style. If you have accusations to the contrary, please point them out specifically so that I or some other editor can ''actually fix'' any |NPOV-related deficiencies (instead of thoughtlessly deleting the whole article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:NPOV)

Comment: kikin is fairly notable, according to  guidelines. There are multiple references to third-party news articles, that support the notability of kikin, and of some of the products they had developed. I don't think we have a policy of deleting articles about startups that have gone out of business on Wikipedia. Don't the third-party sources in the article show its notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)