Deletion of Namak Issk Ka

Comment: possibly speedily.  Topic is notable and nominator does not provide a valid rationale for deletion.  The draftspace version was indeed created first, but that doesn't mean that its author has https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/first_dibs "first dibs" on having their preferred version of the mainspace article in place, whatever form that may take.  Note that the draft author {{u|Unknownnreasonn}} had previously tagged the mainspace article more than once for both speedy deletion (for reasons similar to the above, reverted because this is emphatically not a valid CSD rationale either) and for AfD (reverted because necessary followup steps were not done).  All parties are reminded that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, not a |battleground, and that the proper course of action is to discuss possible changes or compromises on the article's talk page rather than trying to get the "other guy's" version of the article rejected outright
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BATTLEGROUND)

Comment: as |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and failure to satisfy |television notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NTV)