Deletion of Hawaiian Wikipedia

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to Wikipedia. Not sourced, does not meet , and giving special preference to articles about Wikipedia goes against . No prejudice against recreation when it has achieved independent notoriety
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:ASR)

Comment: to List of Wikipedias.  Fails 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I would even suggest a speedy delete because it fails every point of . No notability demonstrated, and I don't think we should have articles about Wikis that haven't received coverage. Nothing against the creator, had he added a couple of references (which should not be hard to find, local newspapers in Argentina have covered Wikipedia as a whole and the Spanish Wikipedia in particular, I guess newspaper or reliable sites from Hawaii had done that as well for this wiki) this discussion would be moot. Wikipedia is somewhat biased in certain aspects (like allowing Wikia links instead of considering them spam just to promote Wikia ranking), but we are talking about articles, not just external links now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Nomination is basing notability upon the 1216 articles the wiki has, thinking that this # is  is a false reasoning for deletion. (And as for "so we'd better use this AFD as the precedent," ummm NO! Articles are discussed upon individual merit, that is what AfD is for, thus it allows consensus to change. It would be a horror show if the first 15 years of Wiki-AfD set precedents that the following 100 years had to follow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTBIGENOUGH)