Deletion of Exaware

Comment: The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria, existing references fail NCORP, topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Overly promotional press release that fails the  requirement of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NCORP)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON. Compass-EOS got some press-release type coverage, but the connection with Exaware looks like  with only passing mention, and almost nothing coming up on all the search links above. Re: GigaOm used # of times, I'll quote you: "As usual, the number of citations currently on wikipedia isn't a good indicator of reliability." Why would you think any differently here (rhetorical
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)