Deletion of Barbie The Welder

Comment: Promotional language can be seen.(
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: I saw the draft>Article space request at WIR and thought she would not be notable, but it got published in any case. There is indeed some coverage, but I cannot get away from the perception that the article is promotion and not imparting any useful information, and |we are not here for that. It's basically an article on someone who welds and had published two DIY books, and had a few articles written about her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO)

Comment: As stated above, I declined a G13 on this draft, thinking it might be possible to expand to mainspace standards, but was sceptical that it was possible. After rewriting the article, removing most of the promotional text and finding additional sources, I concluded there was just enough for it to meet  and moved it into mainspace. (Note the diff given above by Piotrus with the comment "probably not notable" was when I declined the G13, leaving it in draft, not when I moved it to mainspace which was after the rewrite). The litmus test I use for all articles is "can a neutral and uninvolved editor rewrite this past stub standards using independent and trustworthy source material", and that's what happened here. The book deal and evidence of sponsorship also helps
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)