Deletion of Essential CBT Skills Series

Comment: Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: both.  Whilst I think it might be possible to save the corporate article if Jein.Gallaher can come up with some substantiation with appropriate proof and citation for their associations ''"It is known nation-wide and is one of the leaders in the field of psychological skills training. It is a notable company with established links to the British Psychological society and many other professional bodies"'', it seems unlikely that such proof could be forthcoming inkeeping with , and in either case, the DVD set is not notable enough for its own article. '''OwainDavies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: As mentioned above, the references for both articles are entirely unacceptable, the company article furthermore contains quite some puffery. The only claim of notability (that the company is a ''leading'' training organisation) is not referenced at all. Both article subjects seem to be entirely run-of-the-|mill, with no ''documented'' general or historic significance whatsoever. The DVD set article is certainly speediable as it makes no assertion of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: both.  No inidication that either has received the necessary coverage to meet Wikipedia's |inclusion criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)