Deletion of Lothlórien Co-op (2nd nomination)

Comment: I felt like the past AfD was wrongly kept and did not take into account the sock/meatpuppetry |single purpose accounts. At best it should have garnered a no consensus. I didn't provide nearly as nice of a deletion justification last time as Otto4771 did, so kudos to him. Failing  is the major point, but it also fails  and is very POV heavy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:RS||WP:ORG)

Comment: WP:LOCAL says that ''If enough reliable and verifiable information exists about the subject to write a full and comprehensive article about it, it may make sense for the subject to have its own article.'' Most of the information in the article reeks of |original research, especially the stuff about life inside the building. Furthermore, as the article has no sources, the article fails to satisfy |verifiability requirements, which are non-negotiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)