Deletion of Rich The Kid (2nd nomination)

Comment: He passes , in depth coverage in: http://www.forbes.com/sites/garysuarez/2016/02/02/rich-the-kid-migos/#4be0fbd53876 Forbes, http://www.complex.com/music/2016/01/rich-the-kid-2016-interview Complex Magazine, http://www.wmagazine.com/people/2016/07/new-york-fashion-week-mens-rich-the-kid/photos/ W Magazine, he is mentioned in: http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/hip-hop/7340633/stream-rich-the-kid-trap-talk-mixtape-premiere Billboard, http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/watch-steve-aoki-rich-the-kid-ilovemakonnen-host-rager-in-how-else-video-20160629 Rolling Stone, http://www.vibe.com/2016/04/rich-the-kid-rich-forever-mixtape/ Vibe, http://www.highsnobiety.com/2016/04/20/rich-the-kid-15-facts/ Highs Nobiety, http://www.spin.com/2015/10/ilovemakonnen-rich-the-kid-team-for-buoyant-tequila-me-single-stream/ Spin, http://www.bet.com/news/music/2015/07/15/rich-the-kid-out-on-bail.html BET, http://www.mtv.com/news/2904023/rich-the-kid-stunts-fantastically-on-rich-forever-2/ MTV, all which meets number 1 of . Also, you have failed to explain how and where does it doesn't meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:BASIC)

Comment: I mean, there's an in depth article http://www.forbes.com/sites/garysuarez/2016/02/02/rich-the-kid-migos/#50654a223876 here in ''Forbes'', a highly notable magazine. This alone is basically enough to meet . And then there are 34 references. What do you people want. 100 references, 200? Sure some of the refs are trivial but some aren't. OK, I get that the ''Forbes'' ref was not in the article, maybe you all did not know about it, I put it in as an external link. So now there's not excuse for not keeping this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: in view of the reliable sources significant coverage in notable magazines and forbes online identified above so that  is now passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)