Deletion of MSXML

Comment: as it has received significant coverage in reliable academic sources and book coverage and therefore passes . The disruptive editing of the article suggests a negative COI, regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Google scholar reveals significant number of references, isbn 978-1861005892 is also significant.  A number of these may not be independent but I think we would be hard pressed to dismiss everything.  Can nominator confirm due diligence has been given to ?  There has also been significant unconstructive editing on the article prior to nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)