Deletion of Judith Exner

Comment: I don't see a rationale for deletion.  |Wikipedia notability doesn't care if the affair was made up or not.  In addition to the Washington Monthly source, https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/1990/4/the-last-act-of-judith-exner this Vanity Fair piece is clearly substantial coverage of her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The nominator seems to have misunderstood our notability guidelines.  and  don't require anything like an "act of notability." Instead, we require evidence that independent, reliable sources have taken notice of the subject. Obviously they have
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per . True or false, she's |gotten significant coverage over the years
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:SIGCOV)