Deletion of Hakki Suleyman

Comment: Nothing here actually convinces me that this is a sufficiently notable crime as to warrant permanent coverage in an ''encyclopedia'' — it's an extremely localized crime of limited import. And it's a fairly  one, at that — dig deep enough, and you could find ''thousands'' of political organizers, in practically any country on earth, who've done the very same thing or worse without ''Wikipedia'' feeling the need to maintain an article about all of them. Branch stacking may be a uniquely Australian ''term'', but it's far from being a uniquely Australian ''phenomenon'' — I could point to ''dozens'' of examples in ''Canadian'' politics where basically the exact same thing was at least alleged, with the only discernible difference being that "branch stacking" isn't the ''name'' we use for it up here. Yeti Hunter is correct that both  and  militate against this — Suleyman wouldn't earn a Wikipedia article for anything else that's been shown here, and this in and of itself isn't a ''notable'' enough crime to lift him over the bar. And finally, I strongly suspect that the intention here had as much to do with making sure his ''daughter'', and/or the entire Labor Party in toto, was tarred and feathered by association as it does with him personally — but it would be a rank  violation to keep an article on ''that'' basis either. All in all, just not a thing we should be keeping an article about
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:CRIME||WP:BLP1E||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Yes it passes GNG. But it looks like the only thing he is notable for is branch stacking. In other words, for a pretty small-time crime or fraud.  suggests that criminals are only noteworthy if "renowned nationally or internationally", or if the "motive or execution is unusual". None of this applies here - branch stacking is pretty yawn-worthy stuff for 99.9% of the population. None of his other (positive) achievements would make him notable in their own right and I dispute the assertion that he is "not a minor figure" - would you seriously argue that being elected as one of 86 delegates to a Labor party conference gets him an article? That's ridiculous. Hence this article fails to establish notability despite passing GNG. It could also be said to fail , so I can't possibly see how keeping this article adds to the encyclopaedia. Frankly I'm surprised it has't been speedied as a blatant attack page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:BLP1E)