Deletion of Moggmentum

Comment: The sources used include: BBC News, The Guardian, ITV News etc therefore I do not agree that the "sourcing is rubbish". The story may blow over and the social media become less prominent once the "silly season" is over, however it has gained enough attention to meet |GNG as the "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It's not actually a real movement, the article just refers to various jokes about Mogg. It is as yet just a short-lived meme, and  is probably the nearest appropriate standard (not ). If an actual organisation is created, then it will almost certainly merit an article, but there's no reason why this could not be covered in Jacob Rees-Mogg
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NNEWS||WP:ORG)

Comment: into Jacob Rees-Mogg or Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election. Most of the references are coverage of Rees-Mogg or of the Conservative Party's leadership rather than the -required "substantial coverage" of this ''grassroots movement''. As a result the article largely relies on |original research. Clearly poor writing isn't a criterion for deletion, but an article's reliance on original research is often a symptom of non-notability. It is here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)

Comment: its notable and well sourced. I can not understand how having an article on a notable phenomenon can ever be an "embarrassment to an encyclopedia". Also your cry to "burn it with fire", akin to electronic book burning a staple of oppression and censorship I find offensive, no books electronic or otherwise should ever be 'burned'. WP is  and therefore it is only a good thing for it to continue with this page which documents the rise of Moggmentum, which has helped catapult Jacob Rees-Mogg to now become the Conservative front runner for replacing Theresa May. I also disagree with Robofish that it should be merged into Rees-Mogg's own article as this page is about an independent grassroots movement not about Jacob Rees-Mogg himself. This is why these pages exist, as this is not unique, just like the others (Milifandom, Momentum (organisation), Corbynmania and The People for Bernie Sanders) they are about the movement and the followers, not the person they follow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)