Deletion of NLP Modeling

Comment: Per  and by failing  as a separate topic from Neuro-linguistic programming.  Modeling is one aspect of that topic and is easily covered in a section of the NLP article.  The spin-off page has no unique content or references and tends towards a how-to guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:N)

Comment: Talk about !  It has its own daughter boxes, guides, templates, and then has language as thick as a whale omlette.  Its lead sentence could mean ''anything at all,'' and then half of the article, as it exists currently (counting non-graphical elements as "article") is a quote.  Not only does one not get an idea of what NLP is supposed to ''be,'' but one in fact comes to the conclusion that it could be anything from semiotics to gestalt.  I'm sure it has ardent ''adherents,'' and I suppose some of them are Wikipedians, but there is no objective description '''of''' it so much as a believer's reiteration of holy mantras '''from''' it.  To the degree that it is a division of a division of neurological ''theory,'' it can be described in full elsewhere.  To split and then to lovingly overflow with words is to both distort and to maintain what is, in effect, a POV article.  That is a violation of the deletion guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: new-age snake oil promotion. Having a separate article on this amounts to giving |undue weight to fringe science
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)