Deletion of Wide left

Comment: per nom.  |Wikipedia is not news and shouldn't cover insignificant events - I really don't hear much about Cundiff's miss even a week later (let alone how it will probably be after the Super Bowl) and this game really does not have any more significance than any other conference championship game.  But a missed field goal that potentially changes the outcome of the game is not that unusual.  Possibly merge the content (not the title) into 2011 Baltimore Ravens season or even National Football League Lore
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Meets  guidelines by far. Written like an encyclopedia article not like a news article, and sourced by more than just routine news coverage, so I cannot see it falling into 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This is definitely a notable event per . This is not just an ordinary play in a football game, and surely not a |routine missed field goal. This is one that probably made all the difference in which team went to the Super Bowl in a manner that has captured the nation's attention. It is one that will likely be talked about for years to come, given the surrounding circumstances. See , it has lasting effects. As for the article title, that can be discussed, and perhaps the article could have a different title, but that is not an AFD issue. I did see the term "wide left" in several articles, and I have seen other articles titled "wide right" describing similar situations, but as I said, that is not an AFD issue. What should be discussed here is whether this article meets , guidelines, which I believe it does. Also see , where it says "Don't nominate too rapidly for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:ROUTINE||WP:EFFECT||WP:EVENT||WP:ANTICIPATION)

Comment: blatant example of  and . Moreover, plenty of coverage already at 2011–12 NFL playoffs#Missed kick at end of game
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Does not satisfy  criteria, it is way, way too soon to say that it "persists over a period of time" or has "national or global scope".  Quite notable to discuss it at the 2012 AFC Championship game section, and a short mention at Billy Cundiff, but trying to drum up notability based on simplistic "x # of sources" mere days after the game is not the right way to approach article creation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: please read  and explain how this play qualifies as have long-term significance. It's just another missed field goal. For the argument that it was notable because it determined the Super Bowl entrant, please remember that it means we would need to have an article on every single play in a pre-Super Bowl game, a ridiculous requirement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)