Deletion of Gilgamesh in popular culture

Comment: per Guycalledryan's insightful argument. Sheesh, the ''Epic of Gilgamesh'' is the '''earliest surviving work of literature''' -- does everyone saying "Delete" claim that it had '''no effect''' on the rest of Western Literature? If you can prove it does not, then hey, let's delete this article, nominate the ''Epic of Gilgamesh'' & Gilgamesh for deletion on the basis of |WP:NOTABILITY -- hey, how can some jerk who died 5,000 years ago be important? He probably doesn't even have any living descendants. BTW, this list doesn't have a mention of ''The Simpsons'', so for that one reason alone this list should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VAGUEWAVE)

Comment: This is clearly an unsourced article, which can't be |verified.  Furthermore, #IINFO|Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, which this article clearly is. ({{fullurl:User talk:O|action=edit&section=new}} →O
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT)

Comment: as per Corpx, Resolute and nom.  This is the most extreme form of Wikipedia:Listcruft|listcruft and  violations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Similar to what was done with Adaptations of The Picture of Dorian Gray. Adaptations of the work into other media are notable and encyclopedic. A #DIR|directory of every instance the word "Gilgamesh" appears anywhere is not. Do not under any circumstances merge any of this into Epic of Gilgamesh or any other Gilgamesh article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)