Deletion of Comptel

Comment: WP:MILL|Yet another ''|international software company specialising in telecommunications''.  References are to routine deals reported on IT trade blogs or PR aggregators.  They record routine transactions about asset acquisitions or contracts entered, rather than encyclopedically notable achievements, and are fairly obviously based on press releases rather than genuinely |independent sources.  Google News finds some incidental mentions revolving around a lobbying scandal, but there's nothing about that in this article and I suspect that this coverage can tell us very little about this business itself.  No showing of |significant effects on history, technilogy, or culture of the sort that makes for notability in Wikipedia|long term historical notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B||WP:IS||WP:ORGIN)

Comment: Basing notability judgements on the article alone was a mistake - what is important is that the company really does meet inclusion requirements, and that the article therefore needs ''improvement'', not deletion. The company is listed on NASDAQ:  notes that this does not automatically confer notability but is a signal that it should be easy to find, and suggests Hoover's as a starting point. http://www.hoovers.com/search/company-search-results/100003765-1.html?type=company&term=comptel Hoover's does indeed have a report available for this Company. Online searches for the company produce independent, reliable coverage (admittedly a lot of press releases have to be filtered out, though) and  appears to be met. As for the awards - you are right it was only a finalist at the 2011 World Vendor Awards, but it did actually win it in http://www.terrapinn.com/2010/wva/ 2010
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED||WP:GNG)