Deletion of Handedness of the President of South Africa

Comment: Though it's about content in general (and not notability),  says that just because something can be sourced doesn't mean that it should be included.  However, that's an argument for another discussion.  For this article topic, I don't see a way this can satisfy .  The results I see are about "heavy-handedness" or "even-handedness".  It's possible there's some scientific study somewhere that I missed, but I'm really not thinking this is a major topic of discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:ONUS||WP:LISTN)

Comment: For this to even begin to approach otability there must be multiple sources that discuss, in significant detail, the phenomenon "handedness of presidents of South Africa". Mentions, or even in-depth discussion, of the handedness of any individual president is insufficient - the sources must discuss the handedness of "presidents of South Africa" as a collective/class. There is simply no reasonable basis for the existence of this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)