Deletion of Magic, Inc. (organization)

Comment: there are presently two non-primary source |references to the subject of the article.  Both non-primary source references cover the subject in depth.  It is my current opinion that there are insufficient references presently on article, to |verify |notability, to include .  If article is improved I am willing to reevaluate my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:V||WP:NN||WP:ORG)

Comment: I feel that the coverage at the ''Metro Silicon Valley'' and the ''Palo Alto Weekly'' meet the requirements for ''significant coverage'', as  both of these newspapers had an article about the organisation rather than just a brief mention. The article requires a bit of tidying up for tone, but the organisation meets  - my 'weak' support is because of the phrase in that guideline that says ''On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability'' - however, my gut instinct is that this meets the requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)