Deletion of Siopepa Tailolo

Comment: Article satisfies to . (3. Have played FIFA recognised senior international football or football at the Olympic games.) He participated at the Oceanian Futsal Championship, a football tournament recognised by the FIFA. The winner of this tournament participates at the FIFA Futsal World Cup. Tuvalu is part of the OFC, the football association from Oceania and therefore recognised by FIFA. Article is already a half year on wikipedia if it will not be to the criteria satisfy Article already rather removes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: fails  (no significant coverage) and  (has not played at senior international level or in a |fully-pro league
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:FPL)

Comment: as a footballer he fails  as he hasn't played in a |fully pro league or represented his country at senior level. As a futsal-player he fails  as he hasn't participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level such as the Olympics. Also fails  due to lack of coverage in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:FPL||WP:NSPORTS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom. He fails , since it does not cover futsal national teams as playing for them does not necessarily generate significant coverage, and since hasn't played in a fully pro league or the 11-a side national team. In the absence of significant coverage also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG)

Comment: Your claims that futsal caps satisfy  are incorrect. As was established Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onusemu Neemia|here consensus (and on reflection common sense) says they do not (I even argued your case!!) and that  refers solely to 11-a-side football, hence why it is an essay from Wikiproject football, not wikiproject futsal, so the fact that it is a FIFA recognised tournament is not relevant as it is in a sport that is different from the one the guideline you quote in support of your argument was intended for. The only fallback then is , which as GiantSnowman has pointed out it also fails as there is no significant reliable third party coverage. Thirdly, please try to avoid using the "It's been here for ages so should stay argument". This is completely irrelevant and is specifically one argument that editors are asked to avoid |here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN||WP:GNG||WP:LONGTIME)