Deletion of Kwikspell

Comment: Some of the information would be worth keeping if only for more context about Filch's Kwikspell lessons, but the majority of the article is mere plot summary, which is in direct violation of . Any further expansion of the article would have to be |original research or |fancruft, as the company is indeed only mentioned once (unless it's in Book 7, but I would think the article would mention that, and it's irrelevant anyway). Also recommend creation of a new "Harry Potter" AfD category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:CRUFT)

Comment: would not pass  or , violates OT#PLOT, and since the article on Argus Filch already includes a mention of the fictional company, there is nothing to merge
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FICT||WP:NOT)