Deletion of Yaakov Glasman

Comment: Seems to me to be more than sufficient IRS to support  to support GNG.  Sufficient also to add further content to article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Does not meet  no significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.  In my opinion Jewish newspapers are not sufficiently independent sources in these circumstances.  I am surprised to see no notability guidelines for religious figures. {{strikethrough| He did not give evidence at the royal commission into child sexual abuse - he was excused}}.  He may have made comments to the media, but he was not a major player.  Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see where holding a formal position of leadership makes a person notable.  A quick google search does not reveal any coverage outside that already cited in the article.  He may be well known within the Jewish community, but he is not well known outside the Jewish community. I don't see the article as being |a puff piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:PUFFERY)

Comment: per nominator. I am also disturbed by the PR-type language here and the trivial details. The main argument for notability boils down to his outspokenness on various issues, but the article has a |SYNTH feel to it, like the page creator was digging up every mention in a newspaper to build an article. Aside from his views, he doesn't stand out as notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)