Deletion of Chet Ramey

Comment: Interpreting the elinks as sources (they really should be converted to citations), only one of them contributes to notability, the computerworld.com.au appearance.  That's not enough to satisfy  or . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: Summarizing from above.)''  There's only one independent citation and even it is weaker than it should be.  It's a verbatim interview of Ramey, not an article ''about'' him, the subject is bash, not him, and the reporter seems to have uncritically copied some dates from WP in her intro. ( or )  Also, the sources offered fail to document for us the additional criteria for creative professionals, which I interpret to mean, for a software professional, a substantial contribution as an original author, at minimum, of an identifiable and notable feature.  (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:AUTH)