Deletion of Woody Allen sexual assault allegations

Comment: this isn't a POVFORK, since the info is already there.  I agree with 24.151.116.12 that the original info should be culled, and with SlimVirgin that the section of the Woody Allen article would get too long without this 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SPINOUT)

Comment: Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations|Weinstein, Me Too (hashtag)|#MeToo and Time's Up (movement)|Time's Up: these are all notable subjects but we ''aren't'' discussing them. Just because we can arguably throw this into the pot doesn't |mean it is notable. Having a seperate article on allegations and gossip that never had the same ramifications as, say Weinstein, is , especially when the main article can easily detail the allegations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: per , as the only reason this controversy continues to be in the news is its continued use as publicity. Additionally, there is still zero valid controversy regarding his 20 year marriage to Soon Yi beyond the affect she had on Mia and Woody's relationship. If this article is kept, will we be seeing articles of this type for all notable humans who have been merely accused of a crime? --&#124
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: I find {{u|SlimVirgin|SarahSV's}} arguments to be compelling. This article ought to be improved and expanded rather than being deleted. Significantly expanded content is not appropriate for the three BLPs, so a spinout article is appropriate in this case, especially because of recent developments. While I understand {{u|Tenebrae}}'s concerns about the technicalities of the process by which this article was created, please remember that Wikipedia is |not a bureaucracy. If you care about those problems, then clean them up and talk constructively to the editor that made the mess. Do not throw out the baby with the bathwater
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:BURO)

Comment: as an unneeded content fork; The content should be / is covered in the main article already. Copy/paste is not an appropriate  process
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SPLIT)