Deletion of Ryan Tower

Comment: and/or '''redirect to Camp Fortune''' (though I don't feel particularly strongly that a redirect would be ''required'', I have no objection if other people do.) A transmission tower has to do a lot more than just ''exist'' to warrant a Wikipedia article: there are ''thousands'' verging on ''millions'' of such things in the world and they can't ''all'' be notable on  grounds, so we have to be able to source some historical, political or social ''context'' for why anybody should ''care'' about it. That means we need a lot ''more'' than just one news article about its dismantling, produced by a media outlet that used to transmit from it and thus isn't completely independent of it — and the fact that it's ''described'' as "historic" in the headline, further, isn't a magic bullet either, because the article actually documents ''nothing'' particularly or enduringly or encyclopedically historic about it beyond the fact that it existed. It takes a lot more than just one news article from a directly affiliated source to make a broadcast transmission tower permanently notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: The Keep voters state sources must exist, '''but they provide no sources'''. Clear case of . There is no guideline that states broadcast masts must be presumed notable. No one has provided anything that shows this meets NBUILD for historic importance. WP:BEFORE shows nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject '''directly''' and '''indepth'''. &nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:MUSTBESOURCES)

Comment: Its described as https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/historic-local-radio-tv-transmitter-tower-taken-down-1.1024124 historic and seems to have been a reasonably substantial landmark for fifty years.  The worst case would be merger into Camp Fortune and so deletion is not appropriate per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)