Deletion of Clinton L. Riggs

Comment: There is sufficient, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources to satisfy .  And, as per Jrcla2, the fish odor is strong
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: we've been down this road many times before, per , among many other reasons
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Almost notable"? What, like he had it, then lost it? Being the coach of the lacrosse team for Johns Hopkins University is plenty notable enough in my book. Considering all the references cited in this well-written article, I don't know why we're even having this discussion. I feel sorry that Strikehold had to take XX minutes out of his time to deal with this. The extensive media coverage over the years and the content of the article itself more than satisfy |general notability guidelines, and if we must get technical, he bare minimum passes #PEOPLE #3 with his rank of general. I, for one, also don't want to go down this slippery slope of picking off articles on coaches, especially ones like this that even have |Good Article potential. And now 10 of my minutes have left as well that would've better been used on expanding a baseball player article that still needs another 10 hours of work. Great
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MILPEOPLE||WP:GAN)

Comment: passed  easily, as stated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)