Deletion of Islamic Extremism among British Pakistanis

Comment: per , ,  and .  This pure fear mongering and original research. Beware: In the opinion of so called "experts" a significant number  radicalized British Pakistanis will come to U.S to bomb the crap out of us, because they have ancestral ties to Kashmir and  resentment, did we mention they are Islamic? Common, the CIA  also believed that Saddam had weapon of mass destruction. The fact is that the majority of British Pakistanis are law abiding citizens that rejects terrorism. If the government and other interest groups wants to use racial profiling, fine. But Wikipedia should be a neutral place free of bias. Yes, there is a problem of terrorism and extremism '''''between  us''''' (the world) not only the British Pakistanis and the topic of terrorism is already covered on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:WTA||WP:NPOV||WP:TERRORIST)

Comment: Entirely a '''POV,  and |synthesis''' article. The users Boston and Wikireader41 are fixed on an anti-Pakistan bias (see their edits http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Asal_Uttar&diff=277929046&oldid=277899800|1,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insurgency_in_Jammu_and_Kashmir&diff=277929396&oldid=277909796|2, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Pakistanis&diff=277445257&oldid=277410962|3. Wikireader41 even created a hitlisthttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wikireader41/Scratchpad&oldid=277299962#Rude_Editors of Pakistani editors. Furthmore they are violating the rules by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TERRORIST||WP:SYN)

Comment: this article breaches basic policy. It is an |original research synthesis, essay. What's extreme? That's not a |neutral description of anything. There is no way we can write or maintain an encyclopedia article under this topic. Move anything useful to "Islam in Britain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Inherently violates , , . Title (and the subject really) fails  and really needs to be changed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:COATRACK||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR)

Comment: the article is composed of a |synthesis of sources to advance the view that British Pakistanis are increasingly extremist. Additionally, the article has a fundamental problem in that it uses the word "extremist"; it inherently takes an anti-Pakistani slant by calling them extremist. These points considered, I don't think the article can ever be fixed to be compliant with our policies, and thusly should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: as  and . The topic can be adequately covered, with proper context and due weight, in Islam in the United Kingdom, British_Pakistanis, Islamic extremism etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNT||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per mulitiple issues.Violating many policies, policies , , ,WP:TERRORIST and wp:or.There is no assurance that it will,not violate wp:coatrack,Wp:Npov and Wp:or.It is just like turning wikipedia into a ethnic background
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:WTA||WP:NPOV)