Deletion of GraalOnline

Comment: I don't known if this is common on wikipedia that someone introducing a request for deletion try to influence the vote saying that everyone agree to delete the article. But the team managing the game and the creators of the game (Me and Stefan Knorr) are completly against having the article deleted. Could be also interesting to ask the > 300000 players that have downloaded the game and open an account if the game is  or not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per Graal unixmad and Philipp Kern.   is not a valid reason for deletion.  If the article is poor as is, then fix it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: fails  fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NPOV)

Comment: I'm not seeing where this passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Last 4 votes smell a little |meaty
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:MEAT)

Comment: Again, I'm going to say that Graal doesn't quite measure up with . Graal Online is not well known and this "Civil War" won't be resolved on Wikipedia, that's for sure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I have always known it didn't meet , I just didn't know the policies very well. As somebody who has been following this dispute in it's entirety, including talk pages involved, and many others related to Graal Online, this is the only way to resolve it. I'm sure of it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails  and I'm sure I could swear at least one other criterion.  Anyways, get your axe and give this article the treatment it deserves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: I used to play GraalOnline back in the day, but I don't think it meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)