Deletion of GingerBread Lane (2nd nomination)

Comment: per {{u|MelanieN}}. I have made some efforts on cutting puffery down and am still not happy with the COI issues the author has raised. However, I think that the article in its current state does pass , and that the author is trying hard to work within Wikipedia's guidelines even if he's been making some missteps
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:SPAM, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'll be up front and say that part of the reason I recommended keeping the article is that I think it sounds like a nice project and because I appreciate that the author was trying to work within the bounds of Wikipedia policy, and I want to encourage that. I don't dispute that the article still has notability issues.  I'm applying  here a little bit.  I can see how it would go the other way
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: Trivial promotional mentions in local newspapers and only 1 actual article. If a major national or international source was found then I would be in favour of keeping but at the moment it fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: the coverage manages to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: this mind-numbingly trivial article per , , and .  Wikipedia is not an advertising web host or a directory for extremely trivial stuff such as this.  In fact, this should have been speedied off the project, since it was already deleted through AfD once before
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: per {{u|MelanieN}}; though the article needs to cut down on puffery so that  is no longer applicable to it. It is not suitable to have the article covered under Hyatt Regency Crown Center as the connection seems more historical and aside from Kansas City, GingerBread Lane has appeared in other cities, including New York, Washington, D.C., and Pittsburgh
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)