Deletion of Karl Shuker

Comment: per  88.97.15.249, who said pretty much what I was going to say. The article clearly needs to be re-written to remove the (quite blatant) promotional tone, but that's a separate issue and has no bearing here. His books have been reviewed in in ''The New Scientist'' http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14820075.200-yeti-on.html, http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14018983.900-review-rare-sightings-on-the-road-to-rediscovery.html, http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13117845.600-review-tales-of-the-unusual-.html. Articles mentioning his work and quoting him also http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=T6w1AAAAIBAJ&sjid=D6YLAAAAIBAJ&pg=4462,6104348&dq=karl-shuker&hl=en here in the ''Glasgow Herald''; http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/29/science/from-many-imaginations-one-fearsome-creature.html?pagewanted=print&src=pm here in the ''New York Times'', http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/27/us-cat-twofaced-idUSTRE78Q6FV20110927 here from  Reuters, http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/2000/05/07/liv_287583.shtml here in the ''Augusta Chronicle''. Also reviews of his '' Dragons A Natural History'' in the ''Washington Post'', ''Buffalo News'', ''Atlanta Journal-Constitution'' https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Karl+Shuker%22&hl=en&authuser=0#hl=en&tbo=d&authuser=0&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Karl+Shuker%22+%22Dragons:+A+Natural+History%2C%22&oq=%22Karl+Shuker%22+%22Dragons:+A+Natural+History%2C%22&gs_l=serp.12...665886.668868.2.671468.5.5.0.0.0.0.278.686.1j3j1.5.0...0.0...1c.1.2.serp.Va9V0kM_S-E&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=740f8063f56c238&biw=1024&bih=444. Need I go on? Clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)