Deletion of Public perception and assessments of George W. Bush

Comment: Perfectly legitimate topic for an Encyclopedia article.  Clearly notable (major news articles on this exact subject).  Worthy of its own article as there is too much detail to be merged into the main George W. Bush article.  Concern about not being possible to document "all" of the public perceptions isn't a valid reason for delete -- as editors we make such inclusion/exclusion decisions regarding all sorts of subjects on WP. If individual citations in the article don't pass  or appear to be , then edit those mercilessly.  But just because any given citiation (or citations) aren't valid doesn't mean that the entire article should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR)

Comment: because this article will inevitably violate , and for that reason only
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: and trim. The only place I've seen the attack language used is #A6, and this is not that. However, the nom makes a good point about the sections about specific incidents being covered in separate articles. I suggest we trim out everything that doesn't have to do with his approval ratings and rename it "public perceptions..." or even "approval ratings of..." That seems like a fair compromise
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: passes , ,  - I'm not sure what else there is - it is a sourced, encyclopaedic article.  Unsourced parts can be excised, but AfD is not the place for that, as at least some parts are well sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:OR)