Deletion of Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges (2nd nomination)

Comment: per sources listed in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges|first AfD (in the first Keep vote) and per . These sources are significant enough (in number and type) to show notability. The nom requests "substantial coverage" but  says ''significant'' coverage. Significant does not mean substantial, it means significant to show notability. Also the nom's focus on peusudo science theory as a reason to delete is incorrect because the article is about an NGO, not a fringe theory or theorist. What an NGO advocates is unrelated to the notability of the NGO itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO||WP:GNG)

Comment: I take strong issue with the claim that the sources that are being used to establish notability are ''significant'' enough for us to cross the threshold required at . "Significance" means that the sources should speak to the notability of the subject at face value. None of the sources actually do that. See otability vs. prominence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)