Deletion of Steve Greisen

Comment: as non-notable (doesn't seem to meet either  or ) unless more and better sources can be found to establish notability. Most of the current references are highly dodgy (indeed, one of them is another Wikipedia article!) and the couple that seem more |acceptable don't establish significant independent third-party coverage. If kept the article should likely be rewritten from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FILMMAKER||WP:RELY)

Comment: pure promo-spam supported by "references" from the subject's company website and supported here by  and  arguments from s. Very little significant coverage in reliable sources from what I can see. If we removed the peacock language and the non-independent "references" the article would be almost blank. Reads like a |resume
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:SPA||WP:RESUME)