Deletion of AstroLabs

Comment: Meets , per Montanabw and Megalibrarygirl
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Meets . See source examples below. Some of the sources include interview content, but they are not comprised solely of interviews, and also contain critical analysis and overviews about the company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fail  and IMO doesn't pass  (what Wikipedia is not). The source don't meet the standard for notability of being Reliable and Independent and contain significant coverage. Some seem to meet 2 of the requirements but I don't see any that appear to meet all 3 necessary to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NOTPROMOTION)

Comment: I already !voted Delete above but I notice that some Keep !voters are simply saying "meets GNG" or "as per references posted by X" with no further explanations or rebuttals to other discussions. I've examined each and every source and I'm using a variety of policy and notability guidelines to assess those sources (but especially  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: Fails . The references provided are all, without exception,  sources and rely on the company or company officers for information and data, often repeated verbatim. None of the references are objective or can be rightly regarded as being unrelated from the company
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:PRIMARY)