Deletion of Zandspruit Bush & Aero Estate

Comment: I was able to find four sources among that unfortunate wall of primary sources, that are otherwise reliable and independent. They are: http://www.looklocal.co.za/looklocal/content/en/tzaneen-and-surrounds/tzaneen-and-surrounds-news-entertainment?oid=7766462&sn=Detail&pid=4981451&Go-enjoy-the-very-first-Zandspruit-Airshow-this-weekend LookLocalhttp://www.zandspruit.co.za/press/2013-09_ZandspruitAirshow.pdf ''African Pilot''http://www.zandspruit.co.za/press/2011-04%20SA%20Flyer%20Magazine%20Article.pdf ''SA Flyer''http://www.pilotspost.com/arn0000371 ''Pilot's Post''. Sources used more than once only count as a single source for AfD notability purposes (eg. multiple articles in ''African Pilot'' are not going to increase the topics notability). The claim that it is the world's first residential airpark with a game reserve is supported by the sources. I believe this is interesting enough and the sources are good enough for . The article does display some classic  symptoms such as "lots of footnotes to non-reliable sources" (in this case primary sources), picturesque sales brochure language "the River meanders through the estate" and excessive details on how to access and other stuff that doesn't really belong in an encyclopedia article, rather a sales brochure or marketing website somewhere. But that is all editing concern and the core topic appears notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PUFF)

Comment: You don't need to have the sources readable online; in fact, it's prefereable to link directly to the original sources. See , 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:PAYWALL||WP:OFFLINE)