Deletion of UFC 142

Comment: this article meets the notability requirements of both  and . In assessing whether this event meets  it is useful to note that a UFC card meets the requirements of a series, as a fight card usually contains ~12 fights. the Main event was a UFC Featherweight World Championship Fight, which meets the notability criteria in . It is also useful to note that in  the UFC is considered a top tier promoter (is universally considered the number 1 promoter in the world).  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:MMAEVENT||WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:MMAEVENT)

Comment: would be my preference.  This event is already covered there.  I also have concerns about this article and  and .  This seems to be routine sports reporting and, quoting , "Events that are only covered in sources published during or immediately after an event, without further analysis or discussion, are likely not suitable for an encyclopedia article."  I'd agree that there are articles more worthy of deletion, but that's not the criteria
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:EVENT||WP:EVENT)

Comment: to 2012 in UFC events There appears to be a misunderstanding of the guidlines for events, specifically  : Individual events are not inherently considered notable because, on the whole, the coverage they receive is routine in nature (consisting of the event announcement, who is going to take part, and the results). To be considered for a standalone article, the article will need to demonstrate the event's lasting effect using references from reliable and diverse sources that are both independent of the subject and show that the duration of coverage lasted beyond the end of the event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT||WP:MMAEVENT)

Comment: to 2012 in UFC events.  The article lacks  sources to explain how the event has a |lasting effect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIVERSE||WP:EFFECT)

Comment: As far as the  assertion, I contend that the inclusion of numerous reliable secondary sources that have provided significant coverage of this event qualify this article for inclusion as a stand-alone piece.  These sources, such as ESPN, ESPN DEPORTES, Generaccion.com, Jornal do Brasil, The Las Vegas Sun, etc. are in no way associated with the UFC or MMA in general, thus they are independent of the subject and qualify as .  Meeting these requirements, I fail to see how this article can be deleted under .  In fact, it seems to me that the main editors pushing for this article to be deleted are 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SECONDARY||WP:GNG||WP:OVERZEALOUS)