Deletion of Michel Bacos

Comment: Per Epeefleche and Nipson - this individual meets , and is a central figure in the event. The fact that he was later reprimanded as a consequence of his heroic actions is a separately covered event and therefore this person is not notable for a single event. The Jerusalem Post article from 2006 shows persistent coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Operation Entebbe. Generally the Legion d'Honneur would qualify him for his own article, but since there is nothing here that isn't about Operation Entebbe, I think it's a  situation
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: to Operation Entebbe. I can see the argument to his significance in the event, but I fail to see where the article subject meets the |basic notability criteria. None of the sources listed in the article, from what I can tell, makes him the "subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." The subject of the sources listed revolve around Operation Entebbe or the hijacking event, not explicitly Bacos
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)