Deletion of Bibliography of Greece

Comment: I can't think of a solid, irrefutable argument one way or the other ( perhaps coming closest, although not quite on the mark). But policy considerations aside, I find this list fundamentally useless in conveying information, and therefore not fit for an encyclopaedia. If the list contained some metadata on each entry (say, year of publication and/or general topic area), and ideally were laid out as a sortable table, then it might have a purpose; alas, neither is the case (and I for one won't be 'improving' it to that effect, before someone suggests that). Random selection of books on a subject so broad as to be not really a subject, is all this boils down to. (PS:  should not be used as argument for keeping this; if anything, it's an argument for deleting the other stuff also
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:OTHER)

Comment: We have bibliographies for :Category:Bibliographies of countries or regions|many/most countries and Greece is especially notable on account of its classical importance.  Here's an extensive https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Selected_Bibliography_on_the_Climate_of/HFGdhzXXW-gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=bibliography+greece&pg=PA11&printsec=frontcover bibliography on its climate alone and it's easy to find more sources demonstrating a pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per : the scope of this list is so broad that it could include hundreds of thousands of entries. Any useful and maintainable bibliography would need to be much narrower in scope
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)