Deletion of Capital City Green

Comment: per nom. This is very trivial subject, of course, but that aside BHG makes a good point. Even a cursory review demonstrates the material here is not built up on any kind of  at all, and as such should not be constituted as an encyclopedic topic under our guidelines. I understand fully BHG's frustration, as a result, because she has noted with exceptional clarity the problems with the sourcing of this article and yet has been handed a fine dose of  &  in return (as the above comment exemplifies
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OSTRICH||WP:ATA)

Comment: Not as strong as Capital City Red but the sources do enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  by the country mile as do most of these other bus route articles. Please remember this is an Encyclopedia not a bus route timetable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Plenty of third-party references which demonstrate sufficient coverage to pass the |GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)