Deletion of Martha Young-Scholten (2nd nomination)

Comment: on notability grounds, as it is a clear pass of ; abstain on the copy-vio point and on any point of article content, as I haven't investigated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Nominator provides no valid reason for deletion as the article is clearly not a copyright violation.  Clearly meets  as Google Scholar shows thier work is heavily cited
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as fails both general notability guidelines at  and  in particular.  No, doesn't just fails, fails miserably.  Obscure lecturer. Closing editor should not be swayed by hollow arguments given by those saying "keep" ultimately based on .  We have notability and verifiability guidelines and articles need to satisfy them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:PROF||WP:ILIKEIT)