Deletion of James Hamblin (journalist)

Comment: I’m normally the first to jump on the NOTSPAM bandwagon, but I’m not convinced in this case: looks like the original creator wanted to start a stub on a health journalist who is popular with millenials (which, giving away my age range, is why I watch the page, he’s one of my favourite writers.) In terms of sourcing: the article contains in-depth coverage in Politico and the Columbia Journalism Review (poorly formatted, so difficult to tell.) I don’t have time to do further sourcing checks now, but both of these are significant enough publications and the coverage is in-depth. Meets  and the sourcing comes from unlikely sourcing to be churnalism
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)