Deletion of Benjamin Franks

Comment: I have added some references to anarchist magazines which reviewed his monograph, indicating that his work is being read outside of academic circles. I have also added a reference to an article by someone else about his conception of "practical anarchism". It's abundantly clear to me, based on these sources and others added earlier, that Franks meets the |general notability guideline, which should be sufficient. It is explicitly mentioned at  and  that a failure to meet a specific guideline (e.g., ) does not preclude a subject being notable if the meet some other guideline (e.g., 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject neither meets the GNG nor PROF; that's the bottom line. Since notability is not -- and never has been -- inherited, that a work of the author's might meet the GNG certainly doesn't mean he does. If anyone's dissatisfied with this longstanding rule, I recommend raising the issue on the  talk page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: It doesn't meet , and the reason for that is . Sometimes a single book can provide its author(s) substantial notability. This may be one of those cases, but it's definitely too soon to tell
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Regardless of whether or not he meets any of the criteria at , Franks is, as demonstrated by David Eppstein, the sole author of a book which meets the |general notability guideline. It would surely be foolish to claim that his book is notable but that he is not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: GS h-index of 8 does not meet rof: oo  soon.  is not met either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T||WP:GNG)

Comment: Searches did not turn up anything to show this person meets  or . As been said, notability is not inherited. A book may be notable, but it's author may not be. Same with a song and a singer, a director and a film, etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: to ''Rebel Alliances'' now that it has been spun off as a separate article which appears to pass . Franks has no notability for himself, independent of the book, so  applies, but redirects are cheap
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)