Deletion of Shular v. United States

Comment: SCOTUS opinions are |almost always notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: A single blog website and a primary source link are hardly "ample".  Even in its current sources the only  are websitez that regurgitate and/or house primary source texts. Turning primary sources into article content is  and Original Research. The only non-blog, non-OR submissions presented are articles that mention incidential details but lack the depth needed to verify the claims being made. Given that the article contains BLP material (eg the full name, personally identifying information, and a perhaps needlessly detailed criminal history of an otherwise non-notable private individual), it is impportant IMHO to be stringent in applying Wikipedia standards of verifiability and reliable sourcings
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SYNTH)