Deletion of Cockblock (2nd nomination)

Comment: per substantive  improvements by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: sad to say, there are  that mention this http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&um=1&tab=wn&q=cockblock&ie=UTF-8 maybe due to the seduction fans mad keenness to sell the ideas, which we've seen here. As such I can't in all conscience vote 'delete'. However, this one isn't as notable as Neg (seduction).  We maybe don't need all these as separate articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)