Deletion of Philip Guarino

Comment: having had a few days to think about it and having contributed to the article itself, there are a couple of points that struck me that I previously hadn't considered. The subject is briefly mentioned in both an ''LA Times'' article and a ''New York Times'' article. While those wouldn't likely be considered "significant coverage", both reference an earlier 1988 article from the ''Washington Jewish Week'' which both suggest was focused on the subject and another individual. Sources need not be online so we don't require a copy of the article itself and the article's existence is verified by those two papers. It was obviously significant enough so that once published, the article was then referenced in two major metropolitan papers and forced a number of people to resign from George H. W. Bush's campaign committee. Accurately or inaccurately, other books suggest he played an important role in events relating to both Michele Sindona and Licio Gelli and is accused of being a conduit between a US President and the alleged assassins of a foreign leader. Whether those allegations are true or not, they caused him to be the subject of at least some coverage. I think there is a case to be made that his involvement in the political machinations of the 70s and 80s might be sufficient to meet  and the coverage might ''almost'' be sufficient for him to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)