Deletion of Grove Avenue, London

Comment: This isn't clear cut, as there do appear to be some sources available and the street has a bit of history. The problem is that of the five sources cited, none is really good enough. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ClnSAAAAMAAJ This and http://books.google.com/books?id=gNFAAAAAYAAJ this hardly mention it. http://books.google.com/books?id=C2-AAAAAIAAJ This is better but only one line in a 216-page book, so not really significant.  http://www.mazefind.co.uk/cgi-bin/cms/ohra.pl?content_id=1226580660&session_id= This may or may not be reliable, but half of one sentence isn't really enough. And http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oRgYAQAAIAAJ&q=grove+avenue this only gives coverage to one resident, not the street itself. Some of the content given isn't really backed up by the sources either. What we need is a source about the road itself, but there don't appear to be any around, so I can't see how  can be met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: just another NN street.  If a |reliable source can be found for the battle, something on it might be added to Hanwell.  The discovery of burials was presumably reported at the time, and possibly in archaeological literature, rather than merely newspapers.  The orthography of the name Hanwell looks suspect to me, but I am no great expert.  I doubt there is any ancient literary source for the battle, so that I suspect this is a hisotrian's interpretation of the burials, from a time when the study of ancient bones was much less advanced than today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: This does look like a |run-of-the-mill side street. But if you look at the sources, there is information about the street and its history, something uncommon to find about most side streets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)