Deletion of Lowenstein Sandler

Comment: I respectfully disagree with {{U|DGG}}. Based on the notable lawyers in the firm, and its , it easy passes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Vague |lists of links are not helpful - we know the firm exists, what we need are references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GHITS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)