Deletion of Douglas Leahey

Comment: It seems clear from the above discussion that he does not pass . We could consider  or  instead, for his climate change denialist activism, but the only news coverage I can find that mentions him does so only trivially as part of stories about his advocacy group Friends of Science. The group itself appears to be notable (although too much of the article we have on it is self-sourced) but not to the level where its president would also be notable ex officio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: As DGG has outlined even with his reported 80 publications, they are of so little note that he clearly fails . Also fails  Even with the recent presidency of the Canadian organisation (FoS) he has had little or no coverage as an individual for his views on AGW. Those arguing for keep have thus far failled to present sources to show that he is individually notable. I see no significant news coverage of him, only trivial stuff as mentioned by David Eppstein. As a final comment per  there is more detailled news coverage on me in more major outlets and I don't have an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:OTHERSTUFF)