Deletion of Winston Sterzel (2nd nomination)

Comment: Notability not found for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I wish this could be unprotected so it could be recast based on the sources, including those listed by {{U|Cunard}}, but I see substantial info about him in the bike business article (whose content is not being used), at least one of the Chinese sources Cunard lists counts toward notability, so does the "crazy guys" thing, so does ''The Nanfang'', so do the ''Shenzheng Daily'' articles (though it should be noted how many of Cunard's list of sources are from that same paper), and so to a lesser extent does the ''USA Today'' mention. That's enough. So whatever the state of the article now or at previous stages, I advocate keeping it per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: y'all are making me use my Chinese. Anyway, subject does not meet , but the sources provided do allow for a presumption, however slight, of notability, and for an article to thus be written. Having said that, I am disappointed by the blatant canvassing carried out by the subject of the article. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: does not meet ; promotional article. Associated with another nn YouTuber, whose articles is also at AfD, for the 3rd time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: Upon further consideration, I have decided to change my vote. I do not believe this article meets  and notability requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)