Deletion of Gamification (2nd nomination)

Comment: Promising article which should be developed further in accordance with our |editing policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: This isn't what  is for.  Could this article use work?  Yes, clearly.  But there's no argument here that even remotely survives the breadth of sourcing (and more are available for expansion).  Would that all our articles had the citation support this does!  Nominator's opinions regarding the validity of the marketing and management industries are, furthermore, |not compatible with policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NPOV)

Comment:  only applies to neologisms that lack secondary sources, "created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term". Since this article does have secondary sources that use the term, and there are plenty of other secondary sources documenting the usage of the term,  does not apply, as the entry meets the criteria of  and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:N||WP:RS)