Deletion of Marko Stout

Comment: because there just aren't enough independent sources. Even the web pages for CNN and BBC, which are normally reliable sources, have an |opinion problem
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:NEWSORG)

Comment: The article about Marko Stout passes , especially with regard to his work in the field of Fine Arts: renowned museums, such as the Moscow Museum of Modern Art feature his work. Both http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1070810 CNN (CNN|article), as well as http://finance.boston.com/boston/news/read/26219931/mmoma_adds_artworks_by_marko_stout_to_collection Boston.com (Boston.com|article) are |reliable sources that discuss Stout. I hope this helps. With regards, {{nowrap
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Promotional article with wholly unreliable sources:  and press releases.  Subject fails  and .  Article is maintained by a nest of undeclared COI editors, blocked socks, in violation of TOU https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#4._Refraining_from_Certain_Activities
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:UGC||WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: It is crystal clear to me of the reliability of the sources CNN and BBC Record London, per that both sources, subject's otability (people)|notability is established, both sources have editorial board, and are third party sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)