Deletion of WoWWiki (4th nomination)

Comment: At best this should be under the External Links section of the World of Warcraft article.  It's not |notable enough on it's own, even if sources could have been found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: A quick look at google news reveals almost zero coverage of the WoWWiki. It doesn't seem to have obtained notable coverage. Due to this lack of coverage, it seems to fail , and so I have to suggest '''deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I entirely admit that I'd be suffering partial  if I said delete, and the article does have some merit. Drop the opinionated quotes at the top that suffer , and if just the things left are from the actual research sources or how it relates to the growth of Wikia and the like? Okay. However, keeping this because there's finally "enough" notability besides just an external link open the gates to any other gaming wikia site having a justified main wiki article, since in a lot of cases they could cite same Wikia-related articles. Keep, but then needs a complete re-do by someone entirely unfamiliar with the topic and could make it academically. No matter what, it'll end up here again since it's basically impossible to draw a precise line between when encyclopedia-type factual Wiki can lean into and discuss fictional variants. Rewrite. Facts only. No opinion or praise quotes. Add a link to the main wikia gaming portal site to keep it--er--"gaming politics balanced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS)