Deletion of Joseph R. Stromberg

Comment: So far there isn't a single |independent source in the article. Profiles from institutes he is associated with, or author blurbs in books that include one of his essays -- those are not independent and therefore contribute nothing toward showing notability. I looked at a number of possible sources from book and scholar searches, and do ''not'' share Carolmooredc's optimism that they will be useful. They appear to be passing source citations, not discussion of Stromberg or his work
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IS)

Comment: There aren't |reliable sources to meet , and he doesn't meet : no claims of important contribution; lack of citations/reviews of his work; not held a named chair at a "major institution of higher education and research"; no other important positions, honors, fellowships held
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: for lack of evidence of impact outside of his own narrow circle (per  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: The link to GScholar posted by Carolmooredc speaks volumes: just a smattering of citations, 2 here, 3 there, etc. No indication at all that he even approaches any of the cirteria of . No indication either that uthor or  are met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:A||WP:GNG)

Comment: per Colapeninsula. No significant coverage of the person so does not meet ; nor held any important positions, had any significant impact in any scholarly discipline, or meets any of the other criterias for . Doesn't meet the criteria for  of being considered an "important figure"/"widely cited"/"originating a significant new concept" either. Mainly written for publications/netsites of lesser significance and has some citations, but doesn't seem to reach "widely cited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF||WP:AUTH)