Deletion of Emb

Comment: I know some people hate it when we delete an article when it's just been created but this article is already rather long. If the article is so long but still doesn't establish otability then I must presume it's not notable. I will of course reconsider if some reliable secondary sources come up which show it's notable but I'm not holding my breath. If editors are just going to keep adding to it without establishing its notability, then it's probably good if it's deleted sooner rather then later anyway to reduce drama when it is deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Notability not established. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: maybe speedy. I had speedied it A7/web, when it was sitting around with no claims of notability or refs other than from its own domain. It now still really doesn't IMO but does cite two other sources. But the expn one (the one that looks to be in-depth) identifies its source as a press-release and the other is a one-sentence mention on a blog of some sort (and again is sourced back to the site being discussed). No independent , no claims of |notability? I'll avoid a delete/recreate war for myself and leave it to other admins consider A7 or let AfD run its course
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)