Deletion of Teens Run Modesto

Comment: as per  this article drew notable |reliable coverage to include KOVR|CBS 13, which is a television station in Sacramento, California, whose Arbitron rating ranks within the top 21 percent of the U.S. market
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CLUB||WP:RS)

Comment: First off, I didn't look into the discussion at the top in depth, but I don't think that consistently nominating an article under speedy, the prod, then here, is in bad faith per se. It may be otherwise, but I don't see that substantive argument being made above, just the procedural one. My !vote is based on the sources almost exclusively from Modesto: 3 from one week of the Modesto Bee, another two from "Run Modesto", another from the local TV station (same week), and the national ones being, in my estimation, simple announcements of the race/winner. I don't see how any of this is non-trivial coverage that indicates notability. Local marathons (half marathons in this case) will be reported on in the local news, but that doesn't make them notable more widely. In addition, while I see references to the race, I'm unconvinced that these sources really discuss the ''organization'' (the topic of this nomination) in depth enough to qualify under . If someone can point out to me the source that does, I'd change my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This nomination was in extreme bad form and |assumed no good faith by its nominator
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)