Deletion of Legendary Lovers

Comment: To be honest, my previous comments have been partial on the subject () and a bit on the  side as well, as ''I'' did most work on these pages. With that being said, I have read the notability guidelines for songs again and they clearly point out that this article shouldn't be here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:MERCY)

Comment: especially Legendary Lovers). Simply put, they do pass . There are a few of the references that only mention the songs in passing, but there are also others, like http://www.entertainmentwise.com/reviews/129967/REVIEW-Katy-Perry-Prism this one, that mention the songs in more detail, which covers the "Significant coverage is more than a passing mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." criteria. A review doesn't have to have its complete focus on a single song. I completely agree with Another Believer above; there are way too many users who have a deletionist attitude towards articles. P.S. I will not be replying to anyone who feels the need to chime in on someone else's !vote in an effort to change their mind; it's not gonna happen. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: all to Prism (Katy Perry album), or selectively merge if needed. As users Prism and Kww note, coverage of these songs appears limited to their placement on the album. Insufficient evidence, in my view, of independent notability or significant coverage to meet 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)