Deletion of Scientology 8-8008

Comment: This book is a 'advanced study' book for an highly litigious organization, written by a very notable person. I would tend to think any book reviews of the work, would garner a quick lawsuit citing copyright infringments. This organization is so litigious that we, currently, ''cannot'' determine what works cite it. These facts create the Notability others may believe does not exist. The previous suggestion re: List of Scientology Books; this isnt required as it is, IMHO correctly, in :Category:Books published by the Church of Scientology. ISBN 0884044297 should be in the Article though for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I think that the 2 above comments re: a possible Merge meant the existing list, Scientology bibliography - but any material merged (if a "Merge" is the way this AfD is closed, I still support "Delete") should be sourced to / ''secondary'' sources, as opposed to primary self-referential sources affiliated with the publisher of the book
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Based on , criteria 5.  "The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable, even in the absence of secondary sources."  Common sense would tell me that L. Ron Hubbard would fit this definition, whichever side of the divide one is on.  Perhaps YMMV. (Edited to correct my signature of a moment ago.)  Special:Contributions/98.215.48.213|98.215.48.213
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: unless sources satisfying  appear. #DIR|Wikipedia is not a directory of Scientology materials, either positive or negative, and we have no brief to have articles on everything in the corpus. (I got my engrams cleared, I got my hair slicked down
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:NOT)