Deletion of AIA Tower

Comment: Many of these tall buildings (like this one) are pieces of prime real estate that are should be judged by the criteria of , in my opinion. Others have some landmark or architectural significance. There's no evidence this one does, it seems to be non-notable, one of many dozen similar in HK. The reason I'm slightly hesitant about this AfD discussion is the precedent it might set - probably two thirds of the articles listed in List of tallest buildings in Hong Kong could probably be deleted for similar reasons. Something makes me think the idea of a Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks)|notability criteria for buildings should be re-opened and resolved
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)