Deletion of Skytap (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails , as none of the source cited are (per A Train) press releases, notices about the company's funding, or about a product. Nothing is discussed as to the actual impact of the article subject and its service, nor is a point made as to why Skytrap is different from other cloud computing companies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: No indications of notability. None of the references in the Seattle Times are intellectually independent and are company announcements or business-as-usual articles. Fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: I don't think anyone in their right mind would argue that the ''Seattle Times'' is not a reliable source. Clearly it is, it's a major newspaper. That said, is the spirit of  being met here? Are any of the articles from the ''Times'' talking about the societal impact of this company and its products? Is it truly notable? My bar for business notability is lower than most, I think, but the references for this article are all funding notices. What's the wider impact or significance of this company? I'll readily change my vote if somebody can point me to the article I've missed that discusses that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)