Deletion of Richard Ludlow

Comment: A look at Google reveals another "Richard Ludlow" of Ebor Academy Trust who is indeed notable. For this "Richard Ludlow of Hexany Audio, he is still not there. A case of .  I only found these two 3rd party sources http://nerdreactor.com/2018/10/22/colina-legacy-score-release/ 1 and https://learningcenter.berklee.edu/event/exploring-music-sound-video-games 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Their portfolio is noteworthy, and coverage by industry sources, which is ''typically'' PR-ish, suggests they're somewhat notable within their industry. However, all of the sources refer to projects that are from 2018 onwards - indeed, their most notable projects (H1Z1, Blade Runner, PUBG) are from last year - suggesting . Another problem is that big productions often involve multiple studios working in tandem on different aspects of the production (eg. character design and character animation), meaning just by the credits listed here we can't discern whether he was ''the'' sound producer, or ''a'' sound producer, which has implications for . Unless it can be shown that he was in a key position in each of these notable projects, then we should "soft" delete as "too soon", otherwise "weak keep". In either case the credit list should be trimmed to only include major projects. As for  and  - these issues should be handled separately
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:COI||WP:SPS)

Comment: Here is a closer examination of the currently known sources which establish '''notability''' per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The copy contained content not relevant to the subject's notability. Have done a clean-up and removed some articles that were not relevant at all to make it  compliant. The subject has notable references like Forbes and has accomplishments recognized by Forbes 30 under 30 which helps meet  for sure. Have trimmed 'Filmography' section to relevant projects only. The film table has positions which I don't understand. Other community editors can contribute to that and improve it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPV||WP:GNG)

Comment: Having scanned the topic via google search, I believe this passes . This is without prejudice to the suspected COI issue. Another volunteer editor without COI tag can further tone down the page to suit . Having a look at the remaining two related pages as given above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)