Deletion of Elizabeth Dickinson

Comment: Exemplo is wrong about one thing, St. Paul MN ''is'' a large enough city that if she wins it ''would'' be enough to make her notable — but everybody here is correct that the mere fact of being an as yet unelected ''candidate'' for mayor is ''not'' grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself. If you cannot show and |properly source a strong and credible claim that she was ''already'' eligible for an article for some other reason ''independent'' of her candidacy, then she has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to get an article ''because'' election per se. So no prejudice against recreation in November if she wins, but nothing here gets her an article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Even if she wins, that wouldn't be enough to make her notable (per ) and nothing I've found passes the threshold for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: non-notable 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOLITICIAN)