Deletion of Macacawitz

Comment: I think if anything, if there is an article just on the use of the term Macaca, that could be a target. Also the above two "deletes" should be dismissed as  and . I still favor keeping. I don't believe "minor" is a good argument favoring deletion (see ); this article I believe was targeted for deletion simply because it is short. There is no minimum length for an article in order to be worthy of inclusion, and the term is notable after all
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN||WP:JUSTAVOTE||WP:USELESS)