Deletion of Rebecca Chalker

Comment: Enough there to pass  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per , see argument by pburka
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I'm not sure what the "objectionable content" is, but she has an entry in https://www.google.com/books/edition/Feminists_Who_Changed_America_1963_1975/HRouCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA79 ''Feminists Who Changed America: 1963-1975'' and I easily found academic reviews of her books, e.g. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01614576.2001.11074452?journalCode=wzjs20 ''Journal of Sex Education and Therapy'', 2001. Passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: The sources provided are sufficient to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , due to the sources identified by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: while the content of the article is objectionable, the subject meets the criteria of inclusion as there are multiple references about her as https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/soloish/wp/2015/12/15/6-things-that-would-do-more-for-womens-sex-drive-than-female-viagra/, https://www.bustle.com/p/9-fascinating-facts-about-female-sexual-anatomy-8878384, https://www.mic.com/articles/148568/what-is-menstrual-extraction-inside-the-controversial-technique-that-could-help-women, https://www.centralwesterndaily.com.au/story/6605641/tissues-and-tim-tams-for-parents-as-excited-children-start-first-day-of-school/, so she passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)