Deletion of Sajeel Shahid

Comment: I request greater respect for .  There are lots more references than that included in the article.  The individual who claims to be the subject of this article, who asserts the article is not fair to them, acknowledges being part of Al Muhajiroun until 2002.  Well, if nominator had checked for references, he or she would have found that Sajeel Shahid, the Manchester University graduate, gave an interview in 2001.  I suggest that the interview he spoke supportively of muslims from Britain who had traveled to Afghanistan to volunteer to help the Taliban.  Some might suggest this is "one event".  "One event" doesn't preclude a separate article -- if the event is significant enough.  I suggest the roles the interviewee openly acknowledges he played in this interview rise to sufficient significance that it would justify a separate article.  ''However'', one event is moot -- as the individual who claims to be the real world Sajeel Shahid acknowledges running a controversial madrassa.  This is also covered by |well sourced.  So this is two events.  Although the individual disputes that they went underground so they would not have to testify at the trials of associates, this contradicts our 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: Most coverage is in fact not in-depth, but mostly trivial and passing. The best example of in-depth coverage is http://menmedia.co.uk/asiannews/news/s/480163_main_goal__the_islamic_revolution_in_pakistan this; I wouldn't go so far as to include http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_15-7-2002_pg7_12 microscopic, context-free coverage as substantially about the subject because it's not substantial coverage period. Even aggregating the trivial mentions,  is not met. Furthermore, trivial, non-noteworthy mentions are used to support the majority of the prose, which to me indicates a rather clear  problem: if it's noteworthy, it'll have rather more substantial coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BLP)

Comment: I was going to edit this but withheld it as the subject appears to have raised an issue.Hence added only ref.As per  and also  ,we cannot remove articles just because the subject requests it ,negative Biography is allowed if |well sourced .The subject is notable .He is described as  as  founder or Emir of Al-Muhajiroun in Pakistan has been done so even in court. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/apr/30/terrorism.world6http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_15-7-2002_pg7_12
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:BEFORE||WP:RS)

Comment: at best this is , and I'm not at all convinced that even the 1E is notable.  None of the sources used on this article are ''substantially'' about the subject -- instead they are articles mainly about other topics that mention him once or twice.  In my view he certainly fails  and also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: well sourced article about a notable Islamist.  Seems like the subject is asking for deletion based on 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDL)