Deletion of Jimi Hendrix: Canadian drug charges and trial

Comment: A clearly notable and well-covered incident in the life of one of the most important personalities in rock music, who was well known for his history of drug abuse. It warrants a |spinoff article, even if it didn't have one before and even if the new page was only created as the result of an editor trying to justify the use of a non-free image. There is nothing |undue here. Along with the ''three'' separate discussions plus the one below, this AfD is |forumshopping for removal of the image, and the editor who nominated it is being just as |pointy as the editor who created the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF||WP:UNDUE||WP:FORUMSHOP||WP:POINT)

Comment: As far as I can see, this article easily meets  and  and is easily one of the most notable events in Hendrix' life.  It is wholly usual to separate notable events from confirmed WP articles into their own page, such as we do with discographies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:GNG)

Comment: nbsp; As per Flatscan, "This spin-off article does not comply with opying within Wikipedia".&nbsp; I also cite WP:IAR.&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: with a selective merge of the most important elements.  This is far beyond "ordinary" |undue weight.  We are supposed to be an encyclopedia, not "A Study in Scarlet|Police News of the Past".  Encyclopedias are supposed to provide an overview of major events, not the most minute trivia as I'm seeing here
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: This is a valid split of extended detail which would otherwise be too much for the main biography. The event was covered sufficiently by the media to satisfy our  requirement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article not only easily satisfies the , it is a well-written and referenced  of the Hendrix article. It is not a , as it written from a neutral POV to begin with. I do not believe the creation of this article was "pointy" - it certainly is not disruptive
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPINOFF||WP:POVFORK)