Deletion of University of Northern Virginia

Comment: If they ''were'' accredited, they ''were'' prima facie notable, and |notability is not temporary.   Also note that the school's website currently asserts: "The University of Northern Virginia is certified to operate by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV). UNVA is accredited by the American University Accreditation Council (AUAC). UNVA is authorized by the United States Government to enroll non-immigrant alien students."http://www.unva.edu/accredit.htm   If there is contradictory information, that can and should be mentioned in the article, and the school's accreditation difficulties (discussed in http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/dialog/news/2007/12/17/myers this ''Inside Higher Ed'' article, for example) should certainly be discussed. But notability seems established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: as a degree awarding body. Sources available that meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I seriously doubt that this article would have been nominated for deletion if the nominator had looked at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Northern_Virginia&oldid=363972106 this version that I edited on May 24, before a series of anon IPs (probably affiliated with UVA) deleted most (or all) of the third-party sourced content and added a bunch of UVA promotional material (these edits were already discussed by Arxiloxos). I agree that the version that was nominated for deletion was garbage, but that could have been cured by reverting the recent vandalism that had created that garbage; articles don't need to be brought to AfD in order to cure vandalism. As for the theory that only accredited educational institutions should be documented by Wikipedia articles, I might support that theory if Wikipedia were a directory of educational institutions, but it's |not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)