Deletion of D Street Projects

Comment: Firstly, the nom gives no rationale as to why this topic is "non-notable" except to say that the article is an orphan, which of course is not a reason to delete.  Being tagged for improvement for a long time is not reason to delete as there are thousands of stubs that have improvement tags and it's absolutely impossible to get around to every one of them, even in a several year time frame.  This historic housing project easily passes  with some very in-depth coverage from books and articles in both this name and its formal name "West Broadway Development". http://books.google.com/books?id=va5WtROmBBcC&pg=PA199&dq=%22D+Street+Projects%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OQ5NUu39MMaTiQLg-YHQDw&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22D%20Street%20Projects%22&f=falsehttp://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/doc/405340376.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May%204,%202000&author=Stephanie%20Ebbert,%20GLOBE%20STAFF&pub=Boston%20Globe&edition=&startpage=&desc=ROOM%20TO%20SPARE%20DESPITE%20NEED%20FOR%20AFFORDABLE%20HOUSING,%20MANY%20CITY-OWNED%20UNITS%20STILL%20VACANThttp://books.google.com/books?id=959NYT6JtzwC&pg=PA436&dq=%22West+Broadway+development%22+boston&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qhJNUt3-FcGfiQKum4DIBw&ved=0CDgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22West%20Broadway%20development%22%20&f=false  Many pages dedicated to it in http://books.google.com/books?id=gejkYgdkDTMC&pg=PA440&dq=%22West+Broadway+development%22+boston&hl=en&sa=X&ei=qhJNUt3-FcGfiQKum4DIBw&ved=0CEoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=%22West%20Broadway%20development%22%20boston&f=false this book according to its index but we can't see them
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability is established by Oakshade's argument; being an |orphaned article is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ORPHS)