Deletion of The Ashvale

Comment: There are articles published in multiple sources that cover the Ashvale- the Aberdeen restaurant itself appears to be known better than the chain. At the point of nomination there were no references included in the article- a lot of work has been done to add material. While I feel notability has now been established as judged against , there is more material included that appears promotional
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:COMPANY)

Comment: The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. An analysis of the references within the article show the following
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: It seems that this place is pretty well-known locally which is backed by such sources as Evening Express (Aberdeene Newspaper) https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp/news/local/aberdeen-chippers-to-re-open-tomorrow/ 1, https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp/news/local/ashvale-to-close-north-east-restaurants-however-takeaways-will-remain-open/ 2 as well as a source mentioned above https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/nostalgia/2200558/eminent-chipsters-stuart-devine-recalls-the-big-fish-he-has-met-aberdeens-ashvale/3. However this can't be considered a significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources as required by  especially taking into account the stronger emphasis on the quality of the sources required by the guidelines applied to organizations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)