Deletion of Ralph Craven

Comment: doesn't seem to meet .  As always, this isn't a negative comment on the subject of the article, just an acknowledgement that they don't stand out as far as Wikipedia's notability guidelines go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by  and fails to state a reason why notability should be presumed in lieu of sources under .  Googling turned up nothing useful, not even on Google scholar, where I expected I might find some papers that had been cited, given that the subject is a PhD.  I agree with nom.  This individual may be a very good at what he does but that has not made him notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)