Deletion of List of fake news websites

Comment: Per . "Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or membership criteria) should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources." This one isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: I'm not sure why the opinion of Melissa Zimdars (who is she by the way?) warrants its own article; this article will always be based on one source alone and therefore fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've struck my redirect !vote above and am switching to keep. Others added a few sources so as not to be based solely on Zimdars's list, so with  no longer necessary, I changed the lead to no longer list where they came from (that's for the sources to do, after all). I also removed the table, the inappropriate external links, added/removed some wikilinks, added some sources, and pulled some content from separate articles that have been written. We now have a list based on several reliable sources like Washington Post, Columbia Journalism Review, All Things Considered, Daily Beast, U.S. News & World Reports, and there are a ''ton'' more to draw from. Still needs improvement, but it's moved to a keep for me. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)