Deletion of Bond 24

Comment: to James Bond in film#Future, as this fails  but guideline states "Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: per the |notability guidelines for future films. There is hardly a wealth of information here that would warrant splitting into a stand-alone article, especially for a film that may or may not be produced
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: per  in : production has not begun, and there isn't even a title, not to mention lack of reliable sources on two of a very short list of four cast members. The "DYK-worthy" argument above doesn't hold water, since it's too short for DYK as it is (and even shorter given extensive duplication between intro and body), and articles that might otherwise pass DYK do fail for notability reasons, either through deletion or merger—DYK should not be cited in AfD arguments, as DYK depends on AfD to help determine notability in questionable cases
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: I don't get why every time an article on a future article pops up on namespace, someone ''has'' to cite  or . Especially for cases like this, we should be looking at |this policy instead. We do not have to stick to same old policy every time and each AfD discussion has its own merits and warrants its own results. Since SchroCat |has cited Bond 23, let's talk Bond 23. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bond_23&oldid=185970692 This diff shows how it was in 2008, four years before release. Does it look anything like what Bond 24 is like now? Put it short and sweet, merging/redirecting/deleting this does the project more harm than good. Hence my !vote choice. Thank you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:FFEXCEPTIONS||WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: per the clown. Lots of information announced, however unfinal, makes for an article meeting . I'd also be inclined to cite  because of the subject, but I don't think such drastic measures are necessary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IAR)

Comment: With this much concrete information (eg release dates etc), this is now a tangible project that has crossed over from  territory.  I don't think there is any doubt this is a notable project
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to James Bond in film#Future, as clearly fails .  An encyclopaedia should be based on established facts, not fanzine gossip and Chinese whispers
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)