Deletion of City of Sin: London and its vices

Comment: As others have said, meets criteria 1 of  with the reviews already provided in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Unambigously and clearly meets  - '''The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews.''' Nomination purpose is unclear
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: It easily passes  which states, "''The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles...''"  The page already cites four such works and here's a http://www.literaryreview.co.uk/hart_09_10.html fifth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)

Comment: Article as presently referenced meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)