Deletion of Sara Nelson (union leader)

Comment: as per Tomwsulcer and Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: I suggest you read  before you accuse anyone else of an agenda.  You know nothing of me other than what you could ascertain from my edit history, I suggest you review that before you start making any further claims that cannot be supported.  The article needs to be supported by non-trivial support. The  of providing that support falls to the author of the article, not to the reader.  Since you have not provided support, I have AfD the article in the hopes someone will do so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:UNCIVIL||WP:BURDEN)

Comment: Fails . The sources listed in the article are press releases or small statements made by Nelson. I poked around a bit but all I found were additional press releases that do nothing to help notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Keep'''. Multiple (among 16 provided) sources are independent and non-trivial |reliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: As described by the editors above, I think this satisfies . The article should be sharpened up on referencing and content, but the subject is a longtime union leader with multiple reference sources, including coverage on NBC and BBC, plus the op-ed in ''The New York Times''. It seems unlikely the subject is going to go away anytime soon and more sources and judicious editing are likely to improve this article over time, so a delete now would be counterproductive in my view. I've added it to a couple of wiki projects (aviation and organised labour) as it would certainly help to have collaboration and focused discussion around the article from subject specialists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)