Deletion of DKP

Comment: common in MMORPGs, but just about everything in the article is . In a way, it is nothing more than pretty common neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: this AfD seems to be getting hit with a lot of IP users and accounts with very few edits.  That's not a grounds for discounting !votes but I would like to point out that by their own admission, the article is unsourced and likely to remain unsourced due to the fact that this information is not to be found anywhere.  While I agree that it is a valuable source of information, that is the very definition of .  Wikipedia cannot be a primary source of information!  I'm not keen on destroying information, and I wouldn't be opposed to userfying this somewhere until a more appropriate permanent home can be found for it.  Wikipedia is not that place.  No one has addressed the issue of lack of verifiability, lack of attribution, original research, and so on.  All the arguments hinge on  without addressing concerns regarding policies and guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: to the above keep votes - The problem with this article isn't that it needs cleanup but that it is OR and lacks sourcing.  The sources given in the article are not reliable sources, as they are all links to DKP calculators or different MMORPG guilds' websites explaining their DKP rules.  None of these provide any independent sourcing on what DKP is.  If the consensus here is that digging up a guild website that gives their spin on DKP rules constitutes valid sourcing I will gladly withdraw this nomination.  I do agree that it is a highly notable concept and of value to gamers, but Wikipedia is  a game guide.  Don't get me wrong - I ''like'' this article, but it's still completely original research and fails guidelines.  Someone please come up with a valid reason to keep it other than "useful
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The fact that one of those articles references this Wikipedia article is a perfect illustration of why  and avoiding  is so important.  People use Wikipedia as a source of information, and allowing articles that have information we can't verify to propagate information of a dubious origin would be poor editorial work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT||WP:OR)