Deletion of Donal Blaney

Comment: Seems to pass , though just barely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: for a lack of both notability and |reliable sources. All I could find was a http://politics.guardian.co.uk/tories2003/story/0,,1058775,00.html Guardian article mentioning an accusation of racism. That's not  for me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: trying to separate the debate on the AfD itself from all the personal abuse and lack of understanding of Wikipedia practices. For a page to exist in Wikipedia it must prove inherent notability in itself. Claims about being "a media commentator" on an AfD page are not enough - if this is relevant information and makes the subject notable, e Bold|be bold and add the information to the page. In regards the role of YBF you need to prove not that the organisation is notable (that's a case for any AfD on it, for the record I would support keeping that article) but that being the executive of it confers notability on the individual. As I note above other executives have had pages created on Wikipedia and AfDed (with considerably less fuss
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)