Deletion of Visa policy in the European Union

Comment: I see there is A LOT of these AfDs and won't vote on all. I agree with you that all should be on the same page for voting. If these articles offered a historical perspective of visa requirements or more insight, they would be encyclopedic IMO. Right now, they just appear to be a one-stop shop for one to find out what countries they can get into which fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)

Comment: bad faith nomination, passes  for miles, "this topic is not encyclopedic" I really doubt about this comment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: If it's government policy about who can get into which country with which piece of paper, I think that counts as encyclopaedic. Per the text of , if the article advertised a hotel or suggested the best place in Venice to get a coffee, I would agree that it failed , but I doubt that is the case here; it's a significant point of verifiable information. We wouldn't delete Mannekin Pis even though that is overwhelmingly a tourist destination!Basket of Puppies has repeatedly said that these AfDs should be dealt with individually, rather than centrally; and since I don't want any more hints of failing to AGF, I've been trying to humour that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:NOTTRAVEL)