Deletion of Bill Roorbach

Comment: Harpers ref is no good. Other refs are kind of weak, but it has some 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Ouch! Article subject edits article and accidentally deletes all the references in the article while doing so. I've now restored them all (leaving the COI edits otherwise in place as, apart from the COI itself, they all seem unobjectionable) - unfortunately, three of the four are primary (and so only help to the extent of verifying that he has been published in some very reputable magazines) and the fourth is an online magazine which, while it looks reasonably reliable, I had never heard of before. So far as other sources go, GNews produces a http://www.boston.com/travel/explorene/maine/articles/2006/06/25/one_writer_relishes_his_element_wet_singing_woods/ Boston Globe feature article (which looks reliable and substantial to me), a large number of open access newspaper articles which tend to be either from his local paper or event announcements (and therefore at least tend not to count towards notability) and almost as many paywalled reviews for quite a few of his works from a number of sources we generally regard as reliable. To be honest, this one really depends on some of the paywalled reviews showing he meets #3 (which I think probable), someone finding one or two more clearly reliable sources (which I think possible though far from certain) or his Flannery O'Connor Award for Short Fiction (the O.Henry Award looks like one of about 20 for the year, not one of those specially recommended by the jurors) - but on balance I think that one or more of these will be satisfied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WRITER)

Comment: Actually, he didn't remove his references, he merely added personal details, so not sure where the ouch statement comes in. Anyway, that aside, the references listed, only direct to his work. No reviews. As mentioned, not enough secondary coverage to meet threshold of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WRITER)

Comment: The article passes ; however, there are no citations for the article. Just because an article does not contain citations does not mean that they don't exist and does not mean that the topic is not notable; however, I have a feeling that those commenting after me will vote delete due to not having sources so I would advise those who care enough to keep the article get busy with the citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WRITER)