Deletion of Rape jihad (2nd nomination)

Comment: Having read this afd i would like to express my admiration for the cogent arguments that the participants have put forward although the passion being displayed at times may have put off some editors from taking part.  That said, the article appears to meet , however some parts are  (eg. 7 refs, and some repeated, for a 2 line sentence about the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal|Rotherham incident)  These refs in the article all (but 1:)) have ''Rape Jihad'' in their title and look notable - http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3846/britain-child-grooming, http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11278, http://www.afternoonvoice.com/after-love-jihad-now-rape-jihad.html, http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women/, http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/391814/isis-and-rape-jihad-andrew-c-mccarthy, http://www.jewishvoiceny.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8449:rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women&catid=125:iranian-threat&Itemid=331, http://www.udayindia.in/english/content_27sept2014/cover-story.html (the last one although titled ''Mystery of Love Jihad'' has large part discussing Rape Jihad).  Could one or more of the deletionists please explain why they are not suitable (but not a generalisation like "they're all not notable":).  thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OVERCITE)

Comment: the article, even in this form, does not establish the |notability of the subject and has huge problems with |synthesis. Most of the text of this article is actually copied from other articles: the Justification section (apart from the first sentence) is lifted from Sexual violence in the Iraqi insurgency#Stated justification, the section on Darfur is just the lead of Rape during the Darfur genocide and part of the Boko Haram section is from Chibok schoolgirls kidnapping#Aftermath. The sources cited for this material don't even use the term "rape jihad", so its inclusion here is |synthesis. As you can see the material is adequately covered elsewhere (even in the same words), and anyone wanting a summary article is much better served by Wartime sexual violence. The only cited sources I can see which do actually use the term are http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3846/britain-child-grooming http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women/ http://www.afternoonvoice.com/after-love-jihad-now-rape-jihad.html http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/391814/isis-and-rape-jihad-andrew-c-mccarthy http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11278 http://www.issafrica.org/iss-today/sexual-terrorism-in-africa-a-case-of-two-crimes-in-one (the Jewish Voice article does also use the term but is a copy of one of the FrontPage citations). Many of those sources are of dubious reliability and none devotes significant coverage to the term - it is merely used in a headline, or mentioned once in quotation marks. If we got rid of everything not cited to a source which uses the term "rape jihad" the article would be about three sentences long. The fact that a few headlines use a phrase does not mean we can or should have an article on it, or that we should shoehorn material from other articles in order to do so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SYN||WP:SYN)

Comment: Well sourced article on a |notable subject covered by diverse publications like http://books.google.com/books?id=c6obAQAAMAAJ&q=%22rape+jihad%22&dq=%22rape+jihad%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xmw3UqCtJoia9gT3w4GoDg&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBg Pennsylvania State University, http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3846/britain-child-grooming Gatestone Institute, http://www.issafrica.org/iss-today/sexual-terrorism-in-africa-a-case-of-two-crimes-in-one Institute for Security Studies etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)