Deletion of Jerry G. Chmielewski

Comment: Someone can contribute in a perfectly solid way without passing  (which, at least in part, is not about how much they have written but in how much has been written by others about them). If there are a bunch of biographical sources (or awards, etc, as shown in ), speak up, but based on what's in the article and what I could find with a little searching, there don't appear to be. '''Question''': if we delete the article should we unlinkify his name at List of botanists by author abbreviation (C), Symphyotrichum lanceolatum (two places where the abbreviation Chmiel. is linked), and any other such mentions (although those two were the only ones I noticed in "what links here"). It seems odd to have a redlink which invites re-creating an article which, unless people have new sources or something changes, wouldn't be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: No pass of rof, see https://academic.microsoft.com/author/2002251354 MA profile and given his age (Phd almost 40 years ago) I doubt this is a case of TOOSOON. I am not a botanist but it seems he mainly described subspecies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: No pass of rof: oo soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:T)