Deletion of S.W. Randall Toyes and Giftes (2nd nomination)

Comment: This article has been developed to show that the company is indeed notable. I'm seeing many persuasive reliable sources, so it does pass . See in particular: https://www.post-gazette.com/business/businessnews/2005/12/11/His-stores-shelves-are-packed-with-classics/stories/200512110228 Pittsburgh Post Gazette, also featured in the https://www.bizjournals.com/pittsburgh/stories/2009/10/19/smallb1.html?b=1255924800%5e2268301 Pittsburgh Business Times, https://www.post-gazette.com/local/neighborhood/2019/10/31/Essentially-Pittsburgh-S-W-Randall-Toyes-and-Giftes/stories/201908250135 RS calls the store a landmark
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Sufficient reliable sources have been identified to indicate this subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.W Randall Toyes & Gifts|The first AfD, which closed less than 24 hours before this one opened, was withdrawn by Meatsgains with the comment, "Woah! This article has improved tenfold. I will withdraw my nomination. Great work folks." Levivich's nomination saying that "this is just a toy store in Pittsburgh" sounds like . The sources provided show that this is a well-known and popular store. For example, the https://www.post-gazette.com/local/neighborhood/2019/10/31/Essentially-Pittsburgh-S-W-Randall-Toyes-and-Giftes/stories/201908250135 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article isn't "churnalism", it's a reliable source spotlighting a prominent local store. The article has been greatly improved with many references, and deserves to stand
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: for reasons already decided at the first AFD.  YGBSM!  This is just serial isruption|disruption, akin to andalism.  Indeed, this nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:D||WP:V)

Comment: nbsp;I see this unique toy store as more than just a store, but a historical landmark of sorts, a half century old, widely noted. No, it's not as notable as the White House, but, aside for meeting , the reasons to keep are now overwhelming. It's discouraging to see the article re-nominated for deletion after it's already been decided that it should stay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRV)