Deletion of Slashdot trolling phenomena (2nd nomination)

Comment: I'm a bit surprised it survived this long...  This is basically one big piece of |original research about trolling behaviors on one website.  Maybe Dramatica would accept this, but other than a brief mention at the Slashdot article, I don't see how this in any way is encyclopedic material, and I'm a longtime /. reader
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: actually, |yes it does.  Cleaning up the unverified parts would leave a blank article here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Don't redirect to Slashdot#Trolling as redirects to sections doesn't always work.  Interesting work here but it's clearly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: not |verifiable in any way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)