Deletion of Blooming Lotus Yoga

Comment: Should be speedid as |G11. Article says nothing more than ''we have a business to offer'',. BTW nice meeting of paid asian editors here, hi guys
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:NOTPROMOTION)

Comment: The article has several citations from reliable sources that are not reviews. It meets . The article is fairly well-documented, including references from newspapers far away from the subject's locations. As well, the article is recently added - give it some time to develop. Also suggest following , eg ''If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Though I agree that some of the language is "puffy" and recommend to {{noping|BirdBath0239}} (article creator) to clean up some of the text, I see no reason to delete the article. There is easily verified notability in the references cited. Google mentions them extensively and there is plenty of in-depth coverage in independent publications. I went through the list of references, and they offer enough sources with non-trivial coverage to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I am surprised to see this has been nominated as AfD. I do not see any real argument to delete. It meets  and also meets ; The organisation spans 2 countries and is well known in southeast Asia. They have significant involvement with accrediting centers and authoritative institutions in the field of yoga around the world. The subject of the article clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:ORG)