Deletion of Anouk Claes (2nd nomination)

Comment: I would only want to "see more" if it were not interviews, home page content, or other self-published sources. Regardless of all the wishes, the criteria for otability (people)|notability is evidenced by |significant coverage in |reliable and |independent sources. I just do not see the subject meeting the criteria for inclusion in a worldwide encyclopedia. "She not only talks to people, but also to coconuts and wine bottles.", and she also converses with "different detergents". I don't find this particularly interesting or intriguing but some may. It is not Wikipedia's goal to advance the strange paranormal or stranger para-abnormal. There has to be irrefutable sourcing per policies and guidelines. It is not our job to determine the truthfulness. When someone believes in the Bible they can believe that we can Mark 11|talk to a mountain (verse 23). Anything short of proper sourcing and Wikipedia is guilty of propagating WP:fringe theories|fringe theories
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:IS)

Comment: u|Wega14}} - I've tried to summarise your points here.  As far as I can see you have only indicated two reliable sources. I managed to find one more which I have included.  However, from what I can see so far, there is not a threshold to cross .  I'm open to reconsidering my !vote, but so far there is simply not enough to justify an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: She was the main subject of a documentary film on a nationally broadcast German public television station. While she does have some self-published material, one of her books was published by a subsidiary of Random House and her work is held in her nation's national library. All put together, I think it's enough to satisfy . Ultimately the critics here seem to be  arguments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: u|Wega14}} - I have not made a decision on my !vote here, but there seem to be a lot of assertions.  What do you consider to be the best '''three''' |sources that establish the  of Anouk Claes? Please provide just three that address the points raised in 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BASIC||WP:notability)