Deletion of Hillcrest Labs

Comment: spaced ndash}}Topic is passing  per http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/as-the-tv-market-shifts-hillcrest-labs-may-find-its-spotlight-moment/2011/04/29/AFb5slTF_story.html, http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/08/25/hillcrest-sees-more-movement-from-tv-game-companies/, http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368363,00.asp#fbid=DsTkyULcGpB/, and many more references already in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: IMHO, a very sloppy nomination.  The first two references cited are substantial articles, about the subject, from the ''Washington Post'' and the ''Wall Street Journal'' respectively; that's all that's needed to hit the GNG, and no one would need to look over the substantial article about the subject from ''PC Magazine,'' for instance.  Did the nom even attempt to look at the sources present in the article at the time he filed the AfD?  The article is certainly written in a promotional fashion and could definitely stand to be rewritten in an encyclopedic style, but that's a content problem more properly handled on the article's talk page.  A  issue if ever I saw one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)