Deletion of Jigawa ethanol programme

Comment: but preferrably not the present way: this belongs in an article that either shows current politics, economics, etc with ongoing changes in Nigeria, or a historical overview (or detail) on major Nigerian projects, or an overview of African agriculture/oil/..., or a worldwide view on gaining oil from agricultural products. Do not expect quick reactions and improvements for articles from non-English-speaking and/or developing countries as one may expect from the US or Great-Britain () - an article like this has a ''signal'' function. At the appropriate moment, the content should be available and easily found by search operations, thus definitely do not destroy it. Meanwhile, the boxes at top of the article can sufficiently warn readers of the shortcomings
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: Once the program is actually implemented, it might ecome notable. http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Jigawa+ethanol%22&hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLR,GGLR:2006-24,GGLR:en&start=20&sa=N Not much at google. This just looks like promotional material to build support for the thing. |WP is not a soapbox
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: and clean up. I found http://www.businessdayonline.com/?c=132&a=8420 one article on it to compliment the http://www.vanguardngr.com/articles/2002/north/nt327042006.html one in our article. There seems to be enough that we can verify from reliable sources, especially taking  into account
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: I do agree that as it stands now the material is not written for wikipedia however it contains information which could be used to improve a future article.  I also agree that the point about  is a valid reason for having an article on the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)