Deletion of King Lear (2009 film)

Comment: Not according to existing guidelines it doesn't.   explicitly says that "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should '''not''' have their own articles....The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks."   says that "'''All''' film articles pertaining to future films must meet the future film requirements of the film notability guidelines." (Boldfacing in both cases as in the original article.)  I don't see how it can get much clearer than that.  If you want to argue that this particular film is a special case for some reason, you can try to do so, but the guidelines seem very explicit that  applies regardless of any other notability criteria of the film in question
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:FUTFILM||WP:NFF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: Seems to be squarely within the  guideline. I don't see a reason to make an exception for this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)