Deletion of Neanderthal theory of autism 3

Comment: original research. The current article provides four citations to support it: however, the two that are from reputable sources are irrelevant (they concern only the possibility of human-Neanderthal interbreeding, with no reference to autism in any way), and the two that discuss autism are both apparently unpublished original research on personal websites.  a soapbox. The authors are welcome to come back when they have some evidence that this theory has any acceptance in any circles whatsoever. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: since this one has already been deleted three times. If that was not the right decision (and I see that it was by no means a swiftly reached or full consensus, so there's probably room for argument there), the proper way to deal with that is bringing that up at |Deletion review, not by recreating the article repeatedly again under a slightly different name in the hopes that no one notices
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)