Deletion of April 2011 in the Libyan Civil War

Comment: per . Too much unprocessed detail for an encyclopedia. The word ''history'' includes the word ''story'', and this information has no story to tell. Also, this is a Wikipedia:Content forking|POV-split. The article was created by a POV-pushing editor who split material from the original article without including text he disagreed with. This text which did not support his position was deleted, not moved to the sub-article. What the original article needs is to have it trimmed in size so that only the most important events are listed, not split into several equally unprocessed articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Asd has been pointed out above, this so-called splitting because of "WP:SIZERULE" is a mere ruse. It was part of an elaborate and well thought out plan to make numerous changes in various palces to hide the true purpose, which was to conveniently lose elements that the editor did not like, and substitute versions more in keeping with that editor's point of view. There is no good reason for having a host of little articles. Fragmenting the account into little pieces about tiny fragments of the whole story is not helpful in any way. We don't have an article on April 1944 in World War 2. I note that, apart from the author, the only editor here in favour of keeping is Dennis Brown, who says "the event is obviously notable" (but that is about whether to keep the content, not about whether it should be fragmented into separate articles, which is essentially what is at issue here); "a timeline is certainly appropriate" (but nobody except the sockpuppet author has suggested deleting Timeline of the 2011 Libyan Civil War, and that suggestion was clearly a bad faith  nomination); "then merged if that is appropriate at that time" (but gives no reason why it isn't appropriate now); "Merge isn't a topic for AFD anyway" (yes it is
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Adding Timeline of the 2011 Libyan Civil War was clearly a bad faith  revenge act by the author of the other articles. Since the author has strenuously argued below for "keep", it makes no sense for them to say that another article should be deleted by the same rationale. In addition, much of the discussion below does not apply to that article, as is clear on reading it, so in the unlikely event that someone genuinely thinks it should be deleted, it should have a separate AfD. I was not the one who struck out that post, but I agree with the editor who did so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)