Deletion of List of Gurren Lagann mecha

Comment: Who are we to decide what has "real world importance"? Calling somthing  is not a valid reason for deletion. That seems non-NPOV. Has a number of primary source refs. The one secondary source is, however, questionable as RS. In any case, they don't actually need to be notable per #Lists of fictional elements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:FICT)

Comment: Please keep in mind that  is only a guideline.  While it is a valid reason to edit an article, it is not in and of itself a reason to delete one.  Yes, this article needs a copy edit to change some verb tenses and reword a few sentences per . What I don't understand is why the goal is deletion instead of improvement
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:INUNIVERSE||WP:INUNIVERSE)