Deletion of Warlock (Charmed)

Comment: with Magical beings in Charmed (article was just started). Warlocks (Charmed) is another victim of the old , which didn't encourage enough of secondary sources and summary style, but ''Charmed'' has now lost its fandom to longer keep their articles within (updated) wiki policies and guidelines. I presume it can establish notability with the other articles in a new merged state. &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)

Comment: Extremely doubtful secondary sources exist to demonstrate notability. The article is almost entirely #PLOT|plot summary and |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR)

Comment: as there are no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate the real-world |notability of this character. The article fails #PLOT and its in universe style fails . This article needs to be deleted and transwikied to an appropriate fansite
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FICT||WP:NOT||WP:WAF)