Deletion of Benoit family tragedy

Comment: It's a clearly notable event, and there's so much information about it that it's worth having its own article, per .  I also think it's worth moving to its own article, so that it doesn't overwhelm the rest of the information at the main bio. Let's not make the circumstances of his death, the most notable thing about his life
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: I think that the event in itself is |notable enough to warrant its own article. As long as , and  are strictly enforced within the article, I see no problems with keeping it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: This specific event had significant major media coverage by multiple sources. Plenty of information and sources to meet  and warrant it stay as a standalone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: James Kim doesn't (and shouldn't) have a Kim family tragedy article, so why should this guy? Plus, which news article even calls it Benoit family tragedy? The very title violates  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Well sourced and with a large number of notable media references. Uncomfortable subject matter does not merit the  votes. Do NOT merge the article back into Chris Benoit, as stated - the precedent of ''Execution of Saddam Hussein'' existing as a separate article to Saddam Hussein
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)