Deletion of Soroush Saghafian

Comment: We rarely keep assistant professors, though his citations are close to where we might consider it.  But I believe we're looking at a high-citation field (so the numbers are less impressive), and the content of the article is nothing but education, plus some early-career awards indicating more promise than impact.  Looks  for now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: an assistant professor almost never passes . This is a |far too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Agree with Keep comments and he meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I'm not sure this is copyvio, as similarities appear to be primarily names of organizations and awards. In addition to citations, I think there is reason to consider this under  given the editorial roles described as well as the reputation of INFORMS within operations research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: There is a reasonable argument that the subject meets  under criteria 1 based on google scholar score/citations, and criteria 2 based on editorial work/recognition received at INFORMS, the most significant international conference in his field. There is also a fair argument for  mostly based on his status as an assistant professor.  However, his publication history and achievement is substantial for an assistant professor and would almost certainly place him as a tenured professor at most other universities.Special:Contributions/98.118.88.224|98.118.88.224
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TOOSOON)