Deletion of Chel Hill

Comment: reply|ProEmcee}} No, I don't know what percent she contributed, because no reliable sources exist to indicate this information. Without reliable sources, we can't have |verifiable articles. Find the sources, and then make your argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: reply|ProEmcee}} As the nominator of this article, my interest in seeing it deleted is that I don't believe Ms Hill meets the criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia. I have no ulterior motive. I don't have any personal grudge against Ms Hill (nor had I ever even heard of her before encountering this article). I have not removed any information from the article. Other editors have, based on Wikipedia's |verifiability policy that requires |reliable sources. As for Hill's voice-over career, this does not appear to be a source of |notability as there does not appear to be significant independent sourcing for this information. Lots of people do voice-over work; very few ever become notable for it. It tends to be one of those thankless jobs that go largely unnoticed. Notable people have performed voice acting work, but they were notable for other things
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: reply|ProEmcee}} Please read '''''and understand'''''  and . The bottom line is that we need evidence that some third party, independent of Ms Hill, has taken the time to write an in-depth article about her. Listings at Discogs and even at ''Billboard'' are not sufficient. Those sources are sufficient to verify bits and pieces of the article, but they do not amount to enough significant coverage to indicate that Ms Hill merits inclusion at Wikipedia. Wikipedia has guidelines as to what should be included and what should not, and those guidelines are clearly spelled out at the pages to which I have pointed you. If you can demonstrate that Ms Hill merits inclusion based on the listed criteria, than please do so
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO)

Comment: ping|ProEmcee}} Rather than searching for which music database might be considered a |reliable source, you should be looking for instances of '''significant coverage''' for this subject. Significant coverage includes an entire article written by a source independent of the subject and not as part of a PR campaign, published in a widely read and professionally edited source such as a national magazine or a national, edited and curated music blog. When such sources exist, we can then rely on the fact-checking mechanisms of those national publications to assure that the facts in the Wikipedia article can be |verified. Until such sources exist, we generally deem that the person is not yet ready for a Wikipedia article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)