Deletion of Zhong (YouTuber)

Comment: I was able to provide four sources https://filmdaily.co/news/zhong-is-the-youtuber-to-watch-in-2020/ here (in-depth, and |reliable and independent source), https://www.tribunebyte.com/zhong-a-chinese-prankstar-and-youtuber-is-enjoying-an-increase-in-his-net-worth-due-to-his-creative-work/ here (in-depth, and |reliable and independent source),  https://www.seekerstime.com/chinese-entertainer-zhong-is-receiving-excellent-response-for-his-funny-youtube-videos/ here (in-depth, and |reliable and independent source) and https://www.buzzfeed.com/pafog/content-creator-zhongni-zhu-shares-how-to-make-ca-8glx4p5gza/ here (another in-depth, and |reliable and independent source), from Seekerstime, Tribunebyte, Film Daily and BuzzFeed respectively, that meet our common sense definition of reliable, independent sources. Furthermore, the articles themselves are both at length and in-depth. In this way, he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:GNG)