Deletion of Peter Ingersoll

Comment: Based on the cited sources, I don't think coverage of Ingersoll passes the "|significant coverage" requirement for notability. Doing a quick run down of the references, once you eliminate the duplications there are 12 unique references. Three make no mention whatsoever of Ingersoll, and one doesn't look like it qualifies as a RS. Of the remaining eight, mentions of Ingersoll are trivial (mainly one line mention as the source for a single affadavit against Smith). Only two really go into any detail, but it's detail about the affadavit and its reliability and not any detail of Ingersoll himself, and even then it's no more than a few paragraphs. Outside of that affadavit, Ingersoll doesn't appear to have any other notability. Hence delete most, merge the relevant material into the appropriate other articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)