Deletion of Fróði Fríðason Jensen

Comment: Doesn't meet , based on Google-found resources. Table tennis isn't covered by , so there are no bright line criteria for that sport, but I agree with the nominator that the awards listed in the article are for competitions that would likely not be included in the criteria if  did cover table tennis. One comment, on the nomination, however: whether sources are available ''in English'' isn't germane to an assessment of either verifiability or notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NATHLETE||WP:NATHLETE)

Comment: The Faroe Islands' population is under 50,000. The claim to notability is effectively being one of the best table tennis players in a town. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This table tennis player does not appear to meet the |general notability guideline. All the sources provided appear to be routine coverage of sporting events with no biographical content about the subject in them. Although |sport-specific recommended notability criteria for table tennis players have not been established, it appears that he has never even competed in the Olympics, World Championships, World Cup, or European Championships of table tennis, much less medaled at any of those competitions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NATHLETE)

Comment: The language of the sources is irrelevant to whether the person clears  or not, and the size of the Faroe Islands is not relevant to notability either. What is determinative is that (a) the ''level'' of competition that he ''participated'' in is not high enough to confer an automatic inclusion pass just because he was there, and (b) the sources aren't substantively enough ''about him'' to meet the demands of GNG. We don't keep articles about every person who can simply be verified as ''existing''; we keep articles about people who have been ''substantively'' the ''subject'' of media coverage for an accomplishment that satisfies a |notability standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: Responding to Snaevar's characterization of my Delete !vote above as involving "speculation", if that means that I was speculating as to what guidelines  would provide for table tennis if it provided guidelines for table tennis, then that's kind of misguided. I could have limited my second sentence to "Table tennis isn't covered by , so there are no bright line criteria for that sport." In continuing it by "speculating", I was trying to give the article the benefit of the doubt, considering whether it might pass  in spirit if not to the letter
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NATHLETE||WP:NATHLETE||WP:NATHLETE)