Deletion of Andrew Bednar

Comment: does not meet ; has not accomplished anything notable or significant. Wikipedia is not a resume hosting service
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: According to plenty of sourceshttps://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/upstarts-are-out-to-take-a-big-bite-out-of-wall-street.html 1http://www.dealogic.com/insight/ma-boutiques-big-banks-lunch/ 2http://www.businessinsider.com/boutique-banks-are-taking-big-deals-from-wall-streets-biggest-banks-2015-3 3, M&A Boutiques like Bednar's (ranked #3 among top boutiques of 2017http://www.dealogic.com/insight/ma-boutiques-big-banks-lunch/ 4) are doing real damage to Wall Street, gaining  along the way. Not to incite , but as cofounder of his firmhttps://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b14z9pvbwgr1s4/perella-weinbergs-andrew-bednar-drives-stock-exchange-megadeals 5, even if you ignored his many other significant contributions to the field (see Andrew_Bednar#References|refs on page), Bednar is clearly notable, and ~90% of top boutique founders have entries. This isn't far fetched, and it doesn't warrant the  reasoning provided above
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:OSE||WP:JNN)

Comment: passes  and Comment validates the argument
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the subject has attained ; forget the bagels – his work with Deutsche Boerse, NASDAQ, NYSE and LSE alone is certainly notable and recognized as such in plenty of well established |News Orgs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NEWSORG)