Deletion of Francisco J. Blanco

Comment: per Crusio. I also did the WoS and Medline searches; the latter one is more comprehensive and shows 62 articles, with a number of them with citation hits in the hundreds each. Similarly, see GoogleScholarhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=%22F+J+Blanco%22, with top hits of 394, 264, 215, 124, etc. Satisfies . I would have liked, however, to find an current website for this person or at least some indication of where they are now, since the affiliation given in the WP article seems to be out of date
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Although the fact this article was created by a |single-purpose account is not by itself a reason to consider deletion or even suspect a |conflict of interest, it remains that this man's research seems highly specialized and of no immediate interest to everyday life. No notability is otherwise asserted. --Blanchardb
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:COI)

Comment: The notability guideline for scientists is , but he doesn't seem to qualify under any of its criteria. Google indicates that he has various journal publications and such, as any academic would, but there's no material that I can find to indicate that he's a significant expert in the field or that he's made important advances in biology
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)