Deletion of Lu Gui Yao

Comment: Nom's 3rd rationale of  should be ignored
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTKNOWIT)

Comment: I read Chinese. This is just another article about a martial arts (''liuhebafa'', apparently) practitioner who has not been covered non-trivially in independent, reliable sources in any language. The http://www.google.com.hk/search?q=%22%E7%9B%A7%E6%A1%82%E8%80%80%22&hl=zh-TW&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:unofficial&hs=dHI&start=80&sa=N 62 GHits on his name in Chinese consist entirely of forums, websites of places where he has worked, and a byline http://www.lionbooks.com.tw/Detail.aspx?ProductID=z-kungfu-05-04 for an article he wrote (not an article ''about'' him) in a magazine. No Chinese GBooks hits. The name of the association he founded (which contains his own name) has precisely http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=zh-TW&client=firefox-a&rls=com.ubuntu%3Aen-US%3Aunofficial&hs=hJI&q=%22%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E5%85%AD%E5%90%88%E5%85%AB%E6%B3%95%E7%9B%A7%E6%A1%82%E8%80%80%E7%B8%BD%E6%9C%83%22&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E5%B0%8B&meta=&aq=f&oq= 1 GHit, from a Wikipedia mirror. Any claims about how he is notable because of his teacher lineage should be referred to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)