Deletion of Oysters Rockefeller (film)

Comment: without prejudice for now per otJustYet. While the author's COI is always a concern (indicating that |returning it to him is not the best option), the article itself is written in an encyclopedic manner with very POV|neutral POV and does not seem to be promoting the film any more than other Wikipedia film articles "promote" other films.  That said, this one is #films|premature, does not merit being an |exception to FF, and needs to be released and get coverage before an article is to be considered
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:USERFY||WP:NPOV||WP:TOOSOON||WP:FFCLARIFY||WP:NFF)

Comment: per nom + , as the film writer and article writer appear to be the same. This leads me to believe the article is being used as a promotional piece. &nbsp;-- Special:Contributions/WikHead|WikHead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: without prejudice, as it currently fails . The article will be a good candidate for |deletion review if the film is released and receives |significant coverage in independent reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:DELREV||WP:GNG)