Deletion of Veritaserum (website)

Comment: fails . No assertion of notability using reliable secondary sources. I'm also very tempted to call  here, especially given some of the comments above and the reasons given for keeping this article.  and  are quite clear on what sources  requires to establish notability. You cannot argue your way around that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:SPAM||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:WEB)

Comment: per nom. This ''might'' fail , but the article is definitely |unsourced, |non-neutral, and |reads like an advertisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:SPAM)

Comment: Fail , with no , and not . Possibly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:SPAM)

Comment: per nom. Neither  nor , also seems difficult to find |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NPOV||WP:RS)