Deletion of TS-MA2 Moebius

Comment: OK, it ''does'' "cite" some fan sites, but I still believe that there's |OR going on there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per , which states that even ''characters'' (i.e. actual people who do actual things) should get no more than brief coverage in a consolidated article unless they are both widely recognised and utterly central to the work in which they feature. This isn't even a character, it's... uh... OK, I can't actually quite work out what it is from the article. Some kind of combat robot? Whatever it is, it's not important enough to need so much detail (detail which is |inadequately referenced). Take it to some kind of Gundam wiki. This is supposed to be an ''encyclopedia'', not a dumping-ground for fictional specifications of non-existent robots. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT||WP:V)

Comment: the topic itself is not original research, which means that original research is not grounds for deletion of the article.  |Be bold!  Delete the original research, not the entire article.  An "in-universe perspective" is grounds for ''cleanup'', not deletion.  Nobody here has advocated any valid argument for deletion, so I have voted keep by default. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BB)