Deletion of Pennybox

Comment: Here are some sources: http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/financial-services/fintech-pennybox-sees-a-new-way-to-do-dollarmites-20170116-gtsra0, https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/forget-piggybanks-how-about-a-pennybox-041452684.html, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/if-you-want-to-give-your-children-pocket-money-theres-an-app-for-that-2017-8. Technically meets , although on a weak level. Not particularly Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions|absurd to AfC-accept. Don't care if it's deleted, though
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and lacks the coverage needed by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: A  article on a recent start-up, describing its proposition, funding and beta progress, which is the typical coverage needed by any start-up. The best of the sources place its proposition in relation to competitors in its field, indicating some independent perspective, but I am not seeing evidence of attained notability, whether  for the company or  for their app
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (:WP:SPA||:WP:CORPDEPTH||:WP:PRODUCT)

Comment: Even if something passes  it doesn't means automatic inclusion in Wikipedia. Also considering many valid concerns raised ealier, , fails  and article written more or less like 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SPA||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:PROMO)