Deletion of Television series considered the greatest ever (2nd nomination)

Comment: WP:OR/. Yes, the opinions can be sourced to critics, polls, etc, but who decides which sources are significant enough to count? Two examples from the list; TIME magazine's "best television show of the 20th Century" is obviously significant, but Channel 9's 50 Years/50 Shows special in Australia is nowhere near as significant. Where do we draw the line at what sources to rely on, and which to discount? Just because a source passes  doesn't mean their opinions should be used to create a list like this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:RS)

Comment: per  and .  These programmes have nothing in common other than that completely unrelated organisations across the world have at various points in the last few decades voted them at some point the best. That's an indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:UNENC||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The title of the list seems to be narrow enough to define the list per  guidelines.  HOWEVER, several entries need to be removed since they CLEARLY do not meet the title.  Being "considered the greatest ever" requires that some reliable publication has named you such.  There are some shows that qualify, however this list contains MANY that clearly DO NOT meet this criteria.  However, this is a cleanup issue, and not a delete issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: article should be improved through regular editing per , deleting this content does not make wikipedia a better encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)