Deletion of Simon Fraser University 1997 harassment controversy (Xth nomination)

Comment: to Simon Fraser University.  What is the "Simon Fraser harassment controversy?"  This article says that the harassment controversy is that a student filed a claim of harassment, the coach was fired, got a new lawyer, and was reinstated.  The fact that the University appointed an independent body to review its harassment procedures, that 11 other cases were overturned, and that the President resigned, are presented as mere ''Aftermath.''  I beg to differ; the controversy is that the University found its procedures for dealing with sexual harassment were woefully flawed and reinstated 11 former defendants.  The initiating case is important, but is not the crux of the matter.  Ordinarily, the decision of how to frame an article is a matter of editorial discretion, with differing views discussed until a consenus forms.  Here, the matter becomes one of BLP concerns, since this article is being used as a |COATRACK to attack Rachel Marsden.  Merge to Simon Fraser University and refocus on the larger issue, not the initiating case
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)