Deletion of Stephan Schulz

Comment: It's up to the community to decide this. My major claim to Wiki-fame is #1, verifiable via http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=author:Stephan+author:Schulz&hl=en&as_sdt=2001&as_subj=eng Google Scholar (as of now, the first page is all mine, the second has one article by another Stephan Schulz
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Another case of someone who ''might'' be notable in the future, but is not notable now. I argue that the basic issue here is that this person's notability claim rests essentially on a single published idea: the "E theorem prover", so  does seem to apply, as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: to E equational theorem prover (he is sort of ) though I have no idea if that topic is notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)

Comment: or redirect. An academic too junior to have a permanent position, his research does not yet seem to have the impact needed to pass : there is one highly-cited paper, "E, a brainiac theorem prover", but the others have too many authors or too few citations to really convince me. Also, I think  applies. And of course, his Wikipedia work is praiseworthy but not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO1E)