Deletion of Wand of Orcus

Comment: to Orcus (Dungeons & Dragons). I respectfully disagree with Jclemens's assessment that "for a purely fictional element of a game, any mention is evidence of significant real-world impact". The mentions listed above do not meet the definition of non-trivial which is part of the |general notability guideline, and I am unsure why we should hold fictional items to a lower standard. These mentions are good evidence that the Wand warrants a ''mention'' on Wikipedia, and we have Orcus (Dungeons & Dragons), List of major artifacts in Dungeons & Dragons, and the likes of The Throne of Bloodstone for that. I do not understand BD2412's claims, and neither of the other users who supported keeping the article provided an argument
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)