Deletion of Let's play

Comment: Subject is borderline notable, and the sources scarce. Taking a look at the possible sources DGG presented as compared to the article  content...I would be very shocked. It doesn't take much more than even a second to realize that what the books are documenting and what the article are about are 2 mutually exclusive topics. If this were to be kept, I would probably suggest it being reduced to the stub status it recently had until some reliable sources can by found. (The stub status seems to have been reverted by http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Let%27s_play&action=historysubmit&diff=321304874&oldid=313496429 some anons.) I would also probably heeding the advice of |Neo in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: There are no reliable sources for the subject, which is grounds for deletion according to policy. Remember that AfD is for discussing whether an article should be deleted according to Wikipedia's policies, and as such reasons like |"We need an article about X!" and |"I like it!" hold no weight here. If you can prove based on policy that the article merits inclusion more than deletion, that will be taken into consideration
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:ILIKEIT)