Deletion of Lisa Batey

Comment: Multiple reliable and independent sources with substantial coverage clearly satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Like Andrew Lenahan, I do not see the notability here. C.Fred points out that Salon.com is the only |reliable source.  requires substantial coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate long-term notability, I don't see this here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: Strong keep per both  and . See above. Article meets notability guidelines for "significant coverage" with multiple "verifiable" and "reliable" sources "independent of the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:RS)

Comment: I would not delete this only because of the shenanigans. Instead it would be fair to just don't count the votes or the users without further contributions or trying to manipulate.  is given.  depends how you interpret "widley known and recognized". I think that Batey is not so widley known, but like Jennicam she has made pioneering work in the field of web streaming entertainment
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NN)

Comment: Strong Delete''' - Per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN||WP:RS)

Comment: Entertainment weekly, Salon and 2 newspaper articles all meet . I think those articles taken in combination meet significant coverage, and therefore category 1 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)