Deletion of Resperate

Comment: With regard to sources, http://ajh.oxfordjournals.org/ American Journal of Hypertension is an Oxford journal, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7176/homepage/ProductInformation.html The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a Wiley journal and http://www.nature.com/jhh/index.html Journal of Human Hypertension is a Nature journal. These are all reputable journals based on peer review and look notable in their own right. I'm not willing to second-guess the peer review process and assume all of these pubs are inherently biased. On the other hand for a medical article,  applies and strongly recommends an article based on secondary sources Most of these papers look primary. The Sun-Times and Wired article are secondary, but again  recommends against relying on popular press sources for medical content. There is http://hyper.ahajournals.org/content/62/4/e17.short some criticism about the trials and http://hyper.ahajournals.org/content/62/4/e18.short a rebuttal
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:MEDRS)