Deletion of Ethan Sonneborn

Comment: As well as the major US news outlets in the article, I found articles in the South China Morning Post (https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/2159620/election-loophole-ethan-sonneborn-14-isnt-running) Time Magazine (http://time.com/money/5366032/ethan-sonneborn-governor-vermont/) Spiegel (http://www.spiegel.de/karriere/ethan-sonneborn-14-jaehriger-tritt-bei-gouverneurswahl-in-vermont-an-a-1223020.html) and a whole host of other sources. Meets , and hence has no need to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOLITICIAN)

Comment: Worth a mention in the gubernatorial election article. I don't think redirection is proper due to the crystal clear  failure, more than most losing candidates due to his age (almost all of the sources are "novelty" articles), but the information about his candidacy can be included in other places in the encyclopedia, as mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: to the election per E.M.Gregory. Every candidate in every election always gets media coverage, so the notability test for an election candidate is not just "media coverage exists" — because, again, it never, ever ''doesn't'' exist. What needs to be shown, rather, is "the volume of coverage has exploded so far beyond the bounds of normal that his candidacy has a credible claim to being ''special''", which is not being shown by the number of footnotes present here. The determining factor is not |current newsiness, it's |will people still be looking for this article ten years from now — and there's no substantive reason to believe that the answer to that test would be yes
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:10YT)