Deletion of Ted Cruz In Defense of Christians controversy

Comment: or '''Merge''' per . Not enough for standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: into the Ted Cruz article. I strongly considered making this nomination myself, based mostly on a lack of notability per . And the nominator's concerns regarding it possibly being an |attack page also have merit, given the thin (and almost entirely critical) list of sources currently in use
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ATTACKPAGE)

Comment: or posisbly '''Merge''' into Ted Cruz.   applies here.  There just aren't reliable sourcing showing how this event matters long term--at best this is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: or possibly '''Merge''' into Ted Cruz.  The controversy was controversial because it was Cruz and it really doesn't look like it amounts to much. It looks to be a case of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:TOOSOON)