Deletion of Future of food

Comment: The research cited might well be of interest but the presentation looks to have wandered into territory which violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: an unneeded  of Food security. Also, per ; even if there were a topic here somewhere, this article's ain't it. Does not belong and not an asset to the project
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK||WP:TNT)

Comment: per Bartlett; this is fundamentally a question of whether the sourcing verifies its claim to notability, and, whilst it leans perhaps rather too heavily towards one particular source, per , the fact that they are Korean (and German?) does not stand against them. The arguments favouring deletion rather tend themselves towards : reading as |an essay, being |poorly written, and  |that it should be TNT'd, and much of the nomination itself could fall under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NOENG||WP:AADD||WP:PERESSAY||WP:UGLY||WP:TNTTNT||WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: the article quality is  worthy in parts, but this seems to be a plausible topic and I don't see any existing articles on the subject
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)