Deletion of Stellent (3rd nomination)

Comment: this is a tough one. As a publicly traded company, Stellent would have been presumed notable under , but I'm not sure if this still applies to the company that's been acquired. For a sizable company (500+ ppl) and a acquisition target by Oracle, it's surprising that it's tough to find any coverage of substance. It gets a passing mention in http://www.zdnet.com/article/what-has-killed-technology-innovation-in-virtualization/ ZDNet, but that's the extent of what I was able to find, apart from an article in http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=18862 Content Management World. Separately, I don't think that Oracle would be the right target, as that article is already well developed, and Oracle has acquired dozens of companies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED)

Comment: Some of the content is worthy of merging into Oracle Corporation. Notice how the article covers several aspects of its relation to Oracle, yet the Oracle Corporation article has no mention of the company. This is a functional and appropriate outcome, per Wikipedia's editing policy: 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)