Deletion of Saarah Hameed Ahmed (3rd nomination)

Comment: The problem is that this is a  which is precisely there because of  (which is a policy, unlike  which is guideline). In cases of BLP1E, we might have an article on the subject, ''if'' it can be proved that event is notable. The problem is that her claim to fame "that in March 2015 she was (possibly the only) a Muslim woman employed by SpiceJet" is actually not a claim to fame. In the previous AfD I showed that she is "NOT the first Muslim woman pilot in India" which might have been a notable claim to fame. But the present claim is unfortunately not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GNG)

Comment: The nomination claims the information is not encyclopedic but  does not seem to support this. For notability we look for coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources (and in this case find it). We do not substitute our own views of what is important. The existence of the coverage is was matters – the reason for the coverage is not of primary concern
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: again). Current nominator does not cite any policies in rationale. Article meets . Article could use clean up and expansion, not deletion per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ATD)