Deletion of Timeline of Rob Ford video scandal

Comment: to Rob Ford video scandal and restructure.  The very existence of a timeline article violates .  Why can't this information be included in an article summarizing the topic, like the ones on scandals involving other politicians?  If there's no summary article, piling this info into a timeline makes the issue seem very drawn-out and complicated (sure, it is, but this structure makes it seem more so), causing |undue weight to be focused on the topic
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: per TFD, but monitor carefully for  concerns. If it were in the main article, it would definitely be , but it's not
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Meets  |Notability (events):  "event is of lasting, historical significance, and the scope of reporting (national or global reporting is preferred)."  The news media have determined that all the events reported relate to the on-going scandal.  The story has received almost daily coverage in major Canadian media, and to a lesser extent in foreign media, for three months and has even been spoofed on Leno, Jon Stewart, Jimmy Kimmel and the Taiwanese animators.  Note also that major media, including the ''Toronto Star'' and the ''Huffington Post'' have timelines too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Watch for  concerns
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)