Deletion of Bueno Systems

Comment: although perhaps a weakish one.  Yes the article has been created by an SPA, probably COI, and initial intention was probably promotional, and my first impulse was delete.  However, on searching there is I suggest just sufficient  of sufficiently independent sources, even if "within the industry", to get this over the  line.  There are some I think to allow more depth to be added to the article too, including security bugs in their software. COI is not a problem as long as the article has a balanced NPOV presentation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: A  article describing a recent new company. The industry awards for the firm and its CEO do not appear notable in their own right and I am seeing |nothing to indicate this to be more than a firm going about its business; fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (:WP:SPA||:WP:RS||:WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: boring directory entry.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: subtle . A sentence like "claiming to fill a major gap in building operational intelligence in Australia" is lifted off {{URL|http://www.airmaster.com.au/projecthaystack/|http://www.airmaster.com.au/projecthaystack/}}: "  filling a major gap in building operational intelligence in Australia", the Services section is predictably sounding like a rewrite of an About page, awards are non-notable, and sources are week. Fails /, delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:ARTSPAM||WP:NCORP||WP:GNG||WP:DEL8)