Deletion of Ph1LzA

Comment: per above fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as a non-notable person failing / with insufficient reliable independent in-depth sources. The BBC source is focused on  and most content is by the person themselves. PC Mag source is better and less reliant on the single event, although there's a lot of reliance on person's quotes. The listicle article isn't in-depth. That gives marginal 2 sources that came about from one event, which is not enough for GNG. Being known or famous is not notability criteria. Article being factual or accurate is not notability criteria either. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCREATIVE||WP:1EVENT)

Comment: and we might want to offer a guideline for editorial clarity. There's a lot of these types of articles that are created when a YouTuber is mentioned in a longer article about the YouTube gamer scene, with one or two brief mentions. Then a bunch of  is added that is sourced to YouTube itself, effectively using Wikipedia articles as a type of promotion. This is a textbook example of someone leveraging the barest of coverage into an encyclopedia article for their promotion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)