Deletion of N. H. Skyles

Comment: I have no idea whether Skyles is notable or not, as I have not run the first Google search about him.  However,  is ''not'' a separate specific notability guideline under ; SPORTCRIT is a description, with an ''example'' (i.e., Olympic athletes), of what probably would satisfy the general notability guidelines per GNG, and thus perhaps qualify for inclusion in  as a separate specific notability guideline (after discussion and adoption by consensus).  Please note that college football already has a specific notability guideline, , and that is the specific notability guideline that applies here.  If the subject does not satisfy the NCOLLATH criteria, the subject may, in the alternative, satisfy the GNG criteria directly.  ''Selah
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT||WP:NSPORTS||WP:NCOLLATH)

Comment: being "tagged for notability" is not a reason to delete.  Having the PROD removed by the article creator (me) is also not a reason to delete.  The only real argument to delete is that no indepth attention from reliable indepenedent sources is found online.  It should not be shocking that such sources are not found online for a head college football coach from 1893.  As to the significance of the program, it would be another 15 or so years before the NCAA would begin, 27 years before the National Football League--this was the highest level of the sport at the time.  We have confirmed that the coach did exist, was the head coach, and the win-loss record.  We can also confirm the basic statistics of games for the season -- we have data on the coach.  This puts the subject past the threshhold established in : "participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level..."  There is no deadline, let Wikipedia work and offline sources will be found. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTCRIT)