Deletion of OUTeverywhere (3rd nomination)

Comment: meets the GNG and |ORG. The issues raised in the nomination are matters of improvement rather than deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: The article's included reference constitute significant coverage from reliable and independent sources.  Satisfies .  Nominator may wish to read  when nominating articles for deletion.  Your nomination reasoning includes not a single piece of evidence that it's not notable (what's required for the article to be deleted under ) and I don't see the rampant advertising that you do but that's just my opinion.  In the future searching for sources would be worthwhile to the project.  Additionally, AfD's are not for cleanup.  They are to determine if the subject is notable so suggesting that because a change wasn't made after the last failed AfD is directly contrary to goals of an AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:N)