Deletion of Bolivarian propaganda (2nd nomination)

Comment: While I believe the main problem with this article is the , which is too obviously biased too ignore - yet that doesn't mean it needs to be removed, it just needs to be worked. I this the issue at hand is an important part of the Venezuelan society, and as such, shouldn't be ignored. It just needs to be better sourced and have some instances rewritten so that it doesn't violate the  and have a neutral point of view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: First of all I wish to highlight the  of the article: There is no doubt that Chávez and his successor Maduro governments have marked a significant period in Venezuelan history. Chávez has created a great popular support, especially from the lower class persons, and most of this support was created by the way president Chávez communicated his charisma and used the media to his advantage. I consider that the article has good content but also a  issue, which can be solved with further editing and contribution, not a  or  violation which seems to have been talked about in the previous discussion: if the  is a problem more references should be included to turn the article more neutral. For example, its introduction could be more descriptive, and the other sections could explain the ideology of the propaganda or the ways it is featured. For example, the first paragraph of the background section currently explains the ''Bolivarian Revolution'' concept, but then criticizes the government through several sources, while it could explain more about the effects of the ''Bolivarian Revolution'' in the Venezuelan ideology. The term "propaganda" can usually be misinterpreted to have a negative connotation and as a synonym, for example, of "indoctrination". If the title of the article is the problem it should be renamed with a more appropriate title, and if there's information that would be better in another article some of its content could be merged with them. I don't know if some things that I said would be better in the article's talk page, but this is my opinion. The article should not be deleted, and the article's most notable contributor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:POV||WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:POV)