Deletion of Fucked Company (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Abe Dashiell and many others.  The closing administrator should take note that a few people are grossly misinterpreting Alexa rankings, and that this was a profoundly notable website during the dotcom crash, easily meeting  guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Fails  as http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Fucked+Company%22 ghits are low, and http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=www.fuckedcompany.com alexa is 7,379
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: as above. Note I suspect the nomination may be a , ''what'' the point is isn't explained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: This is almost, but not quite, a spurious nomination.  The article is in pretty sad shape, which explains why someone would consider it non-notable, but Fucked Company certainly has received a lot of attention &mdash; it's Ghits confirm that &mdash; especially during the waning days of dotcom and the subsequent crash.  In any case, I don't see any compelling argument to delete that wasn't addressed in the first nomination.  It certainly ''does'' meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)