Deletion of Psychostick's second studio album

Comment: I find it strange that you all cite , dispite the fact that it is not offical guidelines for deletion...I am fine with a '''merge''' to Psychostick until we have enough info to make it work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER)

Comment: You are correct that  is not a policy document in and of itself, but it is an interpretation of policy that many agree with. As a matter of convenience, it's more convenient to link to  than to say "delete because the content is |speculative, the article constitutes |original research and too little is known about the subject to write a meaningful article." In other words,  is a convenient shortcut, and the arguments cited within it are the argument for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:HAMMER||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:OR||WP:HAMMER)

Comment: fails notability per ,  & #Albums. No title, no track listing. No article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (WP:HAMMER||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: a case of  and and meets deletion criterion per |Hammer's Law
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:HAMMER)

Comment: The article fails . Also no , and |reliable sources reporting it. Also the article seems to be own research, see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOR)