Deletion of Regional differences in the Chinese language

Comment: The suggestions for keep don't address any of it's flaws. First it's not about one "Chinese" language: there are two languages represented in the table, Mandarin Chinese and Cantonese. I know the WP policy is to be deliberately vague over whether they are languages or dialects but fact is they are mutually unintelligible varieties with mostly different words, far more than can be contained in an article. At the same time it is completely ignoring other Chinese languages. Second there is no single "China" vocabulary as the first column suggests; Cantonese, Mandarin and other Chinese languages are spoken and used in China. Third as per #Foreign terms "Foreign words should be used sparingly". An article that consists largely of a table of Chinese characters clearly does not satisfy this: even with phonetic translations there would be far too much Chinese text. See also MOS:CHINA which says "do ''not'' use characters or romanized forms excessively, such as for ''common words'', making this a kind of English–Chinese bilingual edition". And lastly #DICT
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:MOS||WP:NOT)

Comment: I see a good faith attempt to write an article here and I understand the potential utility of having this article, '''but''' I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia in it's current incarnation. There is a single reference but the article also appears to contain a lot of . Since this is only about the written form and intends to encompass a wide perspective, a new subsection with some sourced examples may be appropriately merged to Chinese character, which already has a variants section
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)