Deletion of Disappearance of Mollie Tibbetts

Comment: Article is very well-sourced. Even if coverage stopped today, the case passes  by two miles and notability is not temporary. Neutrality issues can be corrected, if any. Recent move to "Killing of Mollie Tibbets" proves this. AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I have been trying to keep the political hot-button issues out of the article at talk, rather than seeking deletion, but I think {{U|Jytdog}} is right about this. It'd be better for this page to go away per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: Like it or not, this story has made international news,https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45291709https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/24/tibbetts-murder-prompts-pushback-against-politicisationhttp://www.letribunaldunet.fr/actualites/mollie-tibbetts-etudiante-americaine-disparue-retrouvee-morte.html and very clearly meets . This may be wishful thinking, but if allowable it would be good if this AFD could be closed sooner rather than later, per , as it creates an ugly red box across what is currently a https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Disappearance_of_Mollie_Tibbetts|Death_of_Mollie_Tibbetts|Murder_of_Mollie_Tibbetts|Killing_of_Mollie_Tibbetts very high traffic article. &nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SNOW)

Comment: This event passes ; also per the above arguments by {{U|GreenMeansGo}} and {{u|Amakuru}}. I would also support a snow keep closure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: Easily fulfills . Not only was the disappearance national news for a whole month (), the following impact on politics makes this article also fulfill . &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:EFFECT)

Comment: per |NCRIME. Redacted to show the intended '''N'''CRIME, rather than my typo of just CRIME.(Full disclosure - I am the original author of this article) The inability of editors to keep politics out of the discussion on the talk page - and, as a result, the article - has nothing to do with whether or not the article should remain. While I recognize the wishes of the family, they don't get to dictate what we do on Wikipedia. The article is well written, well sourced, and the case drew widespread attention in the news both before and after her body was found. I see no valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: At this point, it may be appropriate to consider |a snow keep. As stated by others, |GNG is met. The nominator's use of |LASTING as their primary argument against the keep !votes in the discussion does not appear to be correctly applied. This is a high-traffic article that has been graded by five different WikiProjects as C-class. The crime, whether we or the Tibbetts family like it or not, has been prominently discussed on a national level as part of the immigration debate. We have a well-sourced article that has no business being deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:GNG||WP:LASTING)

Comment: Passes  and . The breadth and depth of media coverage has conferred notability on the crime. Side note, her family's wishes about the crime being politicized have nothing to do with whether or not the article should be deleted and should not have been mentioned in the nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCRIME)