Deletion of Julio Cesar Giraldo

Comment: He has garnered coverage in both English-language and Spanish-language sources, and therefore meets . He is a bit of a trailblazer as the first Colombian to play professionally in MLR, which is probably why the level of coverage exists. The article could use improvement, though, although that's a different topic than AfD, and I've added a few references just now to improve the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He has just recently joined Rugby United New York, so I see a spark of  here. There is very little coverage on the subject, so in this case I believe not meeting the  takes precedence over 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG||WP:NRU)

Comment: Known by whom? Could you be more specific of any references we might be unaware of that may establish 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Player does not qualify for  anyway
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRU)

Comment: Thank you for the links. My two cents on those is as following: the first link is an interview with the subject, which is a poor source to establish notability or significance. The second is an article on the subject's transfer to a new club, which is by all means not a passing mention, but it is very casual and ordinary for transfer news on non-notable rugby players to be posted on rugby news portals. I stand by my conviction that this fails  and  as there are no multiple independent sources (except for maybe the second article you've linked to, but that's just one source) to denote notability or significance
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRU||WP:GNG)

Comment: Believe the following articles are just about enough to qualify it for , https://www.colombiasports.net/polideportivo/respeto-julio-cesar-giraldo-un-sueno-a-medias-en-el-rugby-profesional-de-estados-unidos 1, https://djcoilrugby.com/2020/02/05/rugby-united-new-york-julio-giraldo/ 2, it's very much a weak keep though as I've suggested. Both are now in the article, but incorrectly referenced
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)