Deletion of Haunting Sarah

Comment: It fails .  In the news search above, I looked at about half of the hits and they were all excluded as sources of notability under .  Mostly one-liners and short reviews.  Shorter than most capsule reviews.  I could find no '''significant''' coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTFILM||WP:NOTFILM)

Comment: per  and source per http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Haunting+Sarah%22%2C+review&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&scoring=a available http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&q=haunting-sarah+review reviews. That no one has improved the article is not a valid reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: What part of  does this meet?  Zero
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTFILM)

Comment: There are some http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Haunting+Sarah%22+source:%22-newswire%22+source:%22-wire%22+source:%22-presswire%22+source:%22-PR%22+source:%22-press%22+source:%22-release%22+source:%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2005&as_hdate=2009&lnav=hist7 gnews hits which lead me to think that could possibly pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)