Deletion of Project Peshawar

Comment: this (finally) released and screened and reviewed film per meeting . The accusation of  by {{u|DrStrauss}} is inapplicable. Wow. Had he read the article in ''The News'' https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/225190-Project-Peshawar-screened-at-Nishtar-Hall he might have understood the film has screened and received poor review. Again, wow. Even a hated bad film can meet standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: actually promotion and/or advertising is a valid reason for deletion as per , if there is no encyclopedic content (which this article comes very close to being, in its current incarnation it is little more than a listing). Articles get speedied all the time for advertising, as per . That being said, this article has been cut down so as to remove any promotion/advertising, and since it now passes , I see no reason not to '''Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL4||WP:G11||WP:NFILM)

Comment: There is a disconnect between the stated |film notability guidelines and the way that the guidelines are applied.  As written, unreleased films, and this one was unreleased when it was nominated, are only notable if principal photography itself has been notable.  As applied, films are considered notable, at least by some editors including AFD !voters, if principal photography has begun.  This has the side effect of encouraging the creation of promotional articles on films in principal photography, although removing the promotional material would leave a stub or sub-stub.  One remedy would be to change the guidelines to state that films are notable when they are in principal photography, even without any coverage, but that would just encourage promotional use.  Another remedy would be to apply the guideline as written.  Another approach would be to ignore the disconnect, which is what we do.  I am willing to change my !vote to '''Neutral'''.  I won't change my !vote to Keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: an apparently nn film; I could not find any reviews, just pre-release publicity. Article is 100% promo content which is excluded per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSPAM)