Deletion of World Species List Forest

Comment: No reliable sources proffered, and I couldn't find any.  The creator's discussion on his talk page bolsters the nom's assertion, while throwing in a soupcon of  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:WEBHOST)

Comment: No doubt this protected forest is a good thing for its immediate area, and it was praiseworthy for the donor to create it. However, it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. I can't find that the forest has any presence on Google News, or any presence on the web except its own self-referential sites. So it fails the requirement for otability. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I have not at any point addressed the merits of these woods as a conservation area; in any event, even were it a complete scam, that'd be irrelevant to this discussion, which can only focus on whether this article meets the standards of Wikipedia policy and guidelines.  If you have any arguments to make ''solely based'' on such policies, we will be glad to hear you out.  If you continue instead to engage in personal attacks - and I urge you, for the second time, to review  - you will be souring your own milk
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)