Deletion of Jon Lindquist (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails  and under promotional pressure to boot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Is there any reason why I should not close this speedily as #G4|G4
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: I agree with the nominator that the sources are poor, although more importantly, so far as I can ascertain there are not enough sources out there for him to meet , and the state broadcasting award is insufficient to establish him as notable. I asked on the talk page for an admin to check whether this new version of the article is substantially the same as the one deleted after the second AfD; if the award was also present in that version, I suspect this could be speediable as a re-creation. If it is new, it does not appear to meet the |appropriate specialized notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Someone doing his job, but not receiving coverage required by  to be encyclopedic. There are no reasons for considering his inclusion in "Nevada Broadcasters Association Hall of Fame" to be sufficient; the award doesn't seem to be very selective - each year over 20 or so people get it, and all it amounts to is seemingly an entry on a webpage that is there to http://www.nevadabroadcasters.org/hall-of-fame/index.php honor employees who had worked in the broadcast industry for a minimum of twenty years. So in other words, if you work for 20 years in this industry, you get on the list. Nice, but nothing to to with being encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I remember the previous version of the page and the references were essentially the same. It wouldn't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)