Deletion of Sanaullah Haq

Comment: For those who are in favour of renaming this to Death of Sanaulla Haq: Wikipedia is '''not''' |memorial site
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: and '''Rename Death of Sanaullah Haq''': This article has been improved since it was first proposed for deletion. The event of his death has . Wikipedia titles do have a way to solve some of the controversy above when there is doubt above bio/event and that is to use "death", "murder", "disappearance", etc. "Attack" is not normally used for individuals. I think "Death of ..." is most appropriate. The lead, however, should be tweaked to communicate the point made above about its relevance to India-Pakistan relations (sources above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I agree it is a case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Only one incident doesn't make someone so notable for an article...the creator seems to have made the article solely based on 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Clear case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This is a clear case of . Also comparing this man with Sarabjit Singh is completely wrong, as a number of incidents involving Singh had been a major news in Indian media (don't know about Pakistani media, but they have been also covering him to at least a decent limit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per |Subjects notable '''only for one event''' and |it was not a historically important event nor in any way unique. The reliable sources cover the person '''only in the context of a single event''' (his death in a prison totally common in India). Other than that this person is not notable for ''anything'' else. It's creation is a case of Wikipedia:OTHERCRAPEXISTS|other crap exists. P.S. The issue may be, just ''maybe'', mentioned in Anti-Pakistan sentiment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:VICTIM)

Comment: as it falls within , ,  and  or else '''Merge with Sarabjit Singh'''. The individual was Wikipedia:WIALPI|absolutely unknown before he was attacked. Moreover, a |single incident does not make him notable. Anyway, he is already discussed in the article Sarabjit Singh, who was |notable even before he was murdered. A google search on https://www.google.ca/#hl=en&gs_rn=12&gs_ri=psy-ab&cp=11&gs_id=19&xhr=t&q=sarabjit+singh&es_nrs=true&pf=p&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=%22Sarabjit+S&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45960087,d.bmk&fp=345ec6be39cf6daf&biw=1280&bih=699|Sarabjit Singh lists 94.2 million results, and for https://www.google.ca/#hl=en&gs_rn=12&gs_ri=psy-ab&pq=sarabjit%20singh&cp=13&gs_id=2i&xhr=t&q=Sanaullah%20Haq&es_nrs=true&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Sanaullah+Haq&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45960087,d.bmk&fp=345ec6be39cf6daf&biw=1280&bih=699&bs=1|Sanaullah Haq lists 0.2 million results. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:LOCALFAME||WP:IINFO||WP:INTHENEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:VICTIM)

Comment: The incident occured in the backdrop of the Sarabjit Singh incident and drew mass attention in the media, especially with regard to India-Pakistan relations post-Sarabjit's death. There is extensive coverage on the subject which makes it satisfy . Moreover, the affair has been politically charged and has reached the level where diplomats have been concerned with it. This is no doubt a notable article that needs to be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As of now it's a clear case of . An article about the subject can be recreated ''if'' he becomes notable in due course of time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)