Deletion of Overunity

Comment: Google is, of couse, riddled with false positives, but it doesn't look like the necessary coverage is out there. The "credibility" sentence practically serves as proof that this article is |unencyclopedic, anyways. As a side note, does anybody else find it odd that about half of the external links have nothing to do with overunity but instead deal with physics in general
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: per :2. It is a well known term in the fringe community and likely to be a search term used by some so having it as a redirect would be useful. Might even educate some people. But it needs to be locked to prevent free energy nutters from recreating it again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:RNEUTRAL)