Deletion of Japanese pop culture in America

Comment: This article is just flat out |original research. In fact, this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Japanese_Pop_Culture_in_America&diff=401745620&oldid=401744688 edit summary proves the point that this is someone's research paper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Article needs perhaps a retitle and some cleaning up, but as a subject it is clearly notable as being covered by many scholarly sources.  See http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2008/1215/p01s04-woap.html and http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2008/1215/p01s04-woap.html as newspaper sources, this one here: http://www.amazon.com/Japanamerica-Japanese-Culture-Invaded-U-S/dp/1403974756 is a book length treatment of the topic, http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4472410 here is an NPR podcast.  Had the OP done  merely by typing the title of the article into google, as I did to find these, it would have confirmed this seems to be a perfectly deep enough topic for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: seems like an analogous article (if simultaneously broader and more narrow in scope) to anime and manga fandom or Japonisme, and seems like a |potentially notable topic.  I'm disappointed that there doesn't seem to have been an attempt to explain why the redirect was done, and I'm disappointed by the |tagbombing of the article, rather than |any of the alternatives explained by the editing policy.  This is precisely the kind of |bitey behaviour which leads to Wikipedia not retaining new editors.  Susan J. Napier's ''From Impressionism To Anime: Japan As Fantasy And Fan Cult In The Western Imagination'' may assist in the building of the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:TAGBOMB||WP:EP||WP:BITE)