Deletion of Nemetics

Comment: Article is incomprehensible.  I haven't checked the references in detail, but, if there is a valid concept with scholarly notability, it isn't described here.  My own guess is that is more likely than .  It is incomprehensible. Just because it is in English doesn't mean that an English-reader can understand it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:HOAX)

Comment: Either I'm incredibly stupid, or this is basically a hoax. The whole thing reads like something written by Sokal affair|Alan Sokal. Just take the phrase that was just added to the article: "When analising conversations on different digital media (Twitter, Facebook, etc), nemetics focus on different levels of conceptualization: The individual thinking sequence (NEME)) can develop in repetitive and recursive processes, evolving into collective communication exchange, through a particular flow of events or behaviours." As far as I can see, this actually does not mean anything. If there's something here, the whole article would need to be re-written in order to become understandable. Hence delete either per  or per , whichever is more applicable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:TNT)

Comment: Looks like the term does exist, and is used in some books, see https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=nemetics&rlz=1C1CHMO_en-GBGB583GB583&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZpKC1gcbKAhVEuhoKHbw7CmsQ_AUIDigB&biw=1366&bih=667 Google book search. However, these all seem to be passing mentions, no evidence of significant coverage, so fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)