Deletion of Juliet Davis

Comment: Per nom, Xxanthippe and Agricola44. Passes neither  nor 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: As we're all aware, there are often pleas of "let's wait and see because more notable points would be added", but I'm afraid that's unlikely to be the case here, at least from the  persepctive (which I believe ''is'' relevant, since she's a professor). I've examined her scholarly output based upon her own http://www.julietdavis.com/resume.pdf CV. Her one peer-reviewed publication is listed in Web of Science|WoS, "Fractured Cybertales: Navigating the Feminine" ''Leonardo'' '''41'''(1), but it has not been cited by any other work. The other items she lists in "articles" on her CV would not be considered notable by academic standards, for example 2 articles are from ''Rhizome Digest''. According to the http://www.rhizome.org/editorial/digest/ Rhizome website, this appears to have been nothing more than a short-lived e-mail list, quoting from the site: "The Rhizome Digest merged into the Rhizome News in November 2008. These pages serve as an archive for 6-years worth of discussions and happenings from when the Digest when was simply a plain-text, weekly email". Several items are in ''Media-N'', a recent electronic publication that does not appear to be indexed. One article, "Like a Virgin - Or Not", was "published" by a virtual on-line museum called http://imaginingourselves.imow.org/pb/Welcome.aspx The International Museum of Women. This seems to be a website where women are encouraged to submit http://imaginingourselves.imow.org/pb/Home.aspx?lang=1 personal stories. Another article was published in ''Intelligent Agent Magazine'', which, according to their http://www.intelligentagent.com/ website was/is published (somewhat sporadically) as an online and/or print newsletter and magazine &ndash; yet again, not an academic-standard journal. Finally, the book listed by her CV has not been published yet. I'm afraid that, at best, we get the picture of "a-scholar-not-yet-notable", which does not pass muster with respect to . I'll leave it to others to argue if she passes on any other grounds. Respectfully
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: Zero GS cites. Fails rof. No sign of other otability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:N)