Deletion of Diane Chagnon

Comment: No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article and so does not pass  in spite of holding a sub national office
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: A city with a population of 45K does not automatically confer notability on its mayors under . She could potentially qualify to keep a ''substantive'' and ''|properly sourced'' article — but if all you can do for content is four sentences that offer ''nothing'' of substance beyond "she was elected mayor in 2005 but then lost reelection in 2007", and all you can do for sourcing is smartvoter.org (a |user-generated content site), then she hasn't cleared the bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:USERG)

Comment: since there is a source http://www.dailynews.com/general-news/20101210/duarte-submits-evidence-to-da-to-refute-claims-council-misused-public-funds-in-mining-fight here and a http://www.dailynews.com/opinion/20110913/letter-to-the-editor-the-da-responds mention here, some local coverage http://www.sgvtribune.com/general-news/20091031/former-azusa-police-officer-moritz-dies here, and http://www.sgvtribune.com/general-news/20110908/duarte-officials-wont-face-misuse-of-public-fund-charges-regarding-azusa-mining-project more local coverage here, but generally agree with above, doesn't seem to meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)