Deletion of Militaries of Ace Combat

Comment: Doesn't meet notability requirements, some content is definately salvageable though. Please read  for the criteria for including something. This does not meet it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: no critical coverage from |reliable |verifiable sources independent of the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: completely fails the  which requires significant coverage by secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Also, a great deal of information here violates  because it goes into so much detail about weaponry that it verges on  material. (Although this is really an issue of notability: if the weapons in the game are notable in compliance with the , then of course they should be included.) A complete violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GAMECRUFT||WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:GNG||WP:NOT)

Comment: Not a bad article, mostly primary sources but some others, enough to meet WP:V for certain.  Whoever placed the 3000 tags on the article should be  | wacked. That's just POINTY
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: pure game guide material with no assertion nor evidence of real-world notability. Reasons for deletion include "Any other content |not suitable for an encyclopedia" (Wikipedia is GUIDE|not a game guide) and "Articles whose subject fails to meet the relevant Wikipedia:Notability|notability guideline" (no evidence of "significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOTGUIDE)