Deletion of Pledge of the Tree (2nd nomination)

Comment: I finally got around to reading the full article last night and I have to say that this is one of the most ridiculous AfDs I've seen in a while.  No admin with half a brain is going to delete an article about world history just because most of the online sources aren't in English.  This AfD (and the arguments supporting it) seem |pointy.  Until someone comes up with a legitimate reason to delete the article, I'm dropping out of the discussion.  If, for some strange reason, the article is deleted, I'll see you all at Wikipedia:Deletion review
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: because  is not a valid criterion for deletion. The same sources, such as http://books.google.com/books?id=6cxCAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA346&dq=%22pledge+of+the+tree%22#v=onepage&q=%22pledge%20of%20the%20tree%22&f=false, are still available, just like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pledge of the Tree|last time, had you complied with , item 4. Before claiming that the source I just cited is the ''only'' reference available, you should note that your "no sources" claim has already been disproved, and should research whether other paper references can be found at a university library
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: No evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources; 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)