Deletion of Nenad Vekić

Comment: a search for sources reveals only routine coverage, mostly on statistical websites. No evidence that this player meets the . , as part of  does not trump GNG, as confirmed by the community in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 135#The criteria of  here are too inclusive|this discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTY||WP:NSPORT)

Comment: No sources, no article. We cannot meet , , , and  when the ''only'' available sources are primary statistics databases. This article has no secondary sources at all, and I can't find any online. Without sources, we end up with a one-line article such as the one we have now. If sources are found, the article can always be recreated. Until then, having this article violates like every content policy we have
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:BLP||WP:NOT)

Comment: Fails  and therefore fails .  is guidance given as part of Wikipedia:Notability (sports) which states "the subjects of standalone articles should meet the General Notability Guideline. The guideline on this page provides bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline."  is therefore merely guidance as to whether a subject is likely to pass . In this case the guidance fails because there isn't signifiant coverage in reliable sources. A biography needs more than statistical tables as a source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FOOTY||WP:GNG)

Comment: meets ; needs improving, not deleting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)