Deletion of Glossary of Christian, Jewish, and Messianic terms

Comment: Per #OR and #DIR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: This article is basically |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per nom and as a violation of  and #DICTIONARY
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NOT)

Comment: Give me citations, because right now this looks like a big pile of |OR and |POV. 56 items in the chart, 3 different view points and only 21 citations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV)

Comment: as a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Despite its references almost completely , leaving alone the egregious / violation by suggesting messianism is on equal footing with Judaism and Christianity. Not salvageable in any form, IMO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:WEIGHT)

Comment: per #DICT, which precisely covers an article of this type. I see no need to address other policy issues. A glossary itself violates #DICT regardless of the topic(s) the glossary is on, so I see no point in discussing any questions relating to those topic(s). Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: I changed the header from "Votes" to "Opinions".  |Articles for Deletion is not a vote and it is a bit misleading to those who may be less familiar with the process to label it as such
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: Per #OR, #DIR (repositories of topics, directory style entry, and non-encyclopediic cross-cat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)