Deletion of Daniel Bourne

Comment: although it is difficult to get a job in his field, that doesn't mean diddly to , which he fails
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I still don't see how he meets either notability standards of  or .  Here's the standards for a professor set at  (which are similar to ''Creative professionals'' standards at 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: My geographic area; I would have never though a prof from the College of Wooster would pass . I guess I learn something new every day
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He is poet, so   does not apply.  His translations are widely admired, and Artful Dodger is a good journal.  This is what notability consists of.  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/160.39.33.150|160.39.33.150
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Non-notable academic; fails  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: First, I do not think he qualifies under . He is known for his poetry and translations, not for his scholarly research. But he does seem to qualify under  as a creative professional/poet/translator, even if the case is not very strong (but previous AfDs regarding poets show that such situations are not unusual and that it is often not easy to demonstrate notability there). The page has been improved considerably in the last few days and looks mostly up to speed now. GoogleBooks, even after filtering, gives 111 hits for himhttp://books.google.com/books?tab=sp&sa=N&um=1&lr=&q=%22Daniel+Bourne%22+poetry&sa=N. GoogleScholar produces 29 hits after filteringhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?um=1&lr=&q=%22Daniel%20Bourne%22%20poetry&sa=N&tab=ps, some of which give explicit praise to his work and go into biographical details. For example,  this:http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/getdocument.aspx?logid=5&id=0A961CC8-8A02-4ABE-BBF2-1AE326625409, an 2001 article in "Sarmatian Review", goes at some length talking about him
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)