Deletion of The Well (church)

Comment: Beyond the several nice refs used in the article, I also found http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=BH&s_site=bradenton&p_multi=BH&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10C2AD2330ED67E8&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM The Bradenton Herald. Per  this article passes . Ecoleetage did a nice job of bringing this article into line
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)

Comment: I volunteered to rewrite this article after a previous version by another editor was deleted as G11.  Clearly, the self-promotional issues that doomed the earlier article were removed here.  What remains now is a decent little stub.  The article passes  without problem, and the Knight-Ridder news article cites it as being prominent within the emerging church movement.  Its notability for its off-beat setting and services are also clearly cited in the media coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: mostly per Ecoleetage. The sources show exactly how this is notable, such as the Knight-Ridder news articles of the emerging church movement, so there is no reason to delete. Easily passes |notability. &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)