Deletion of Tarusan

Comment: per nom.  does not guarantee notability, {{abbr|all corners of the Philippines are under the jurisdiction of barangays|KINDA?}}, and nothing is significant with this barangay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: I would want to give the article's creator a chance to assert the article's notability per  (and not just ). But my view for more than a decade now is that most barangays in the Philippines are not notable because they wouldn't pass . Most of them will be just like this current barangay in question: a bare bones stub article about dry statistics like population and the like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: Appears to be a genuine distinct settlement, as opposed to a sub-division of an urban area, and is therefore notable per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Most people who simply point to  to argue for keeping this barangay article (and other past barangay AfDs) are typically not from the Philippines. While most Filipinos (like all of the ones that have chimed in this discussion AFAICT), do not consider barangays to be automatically notable and instead should be decided on a case-by-case basis
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)