Deletion of Ethiopian Airlines ET702 hijacking

Comment: per . A lot of rationalization going on in the above responses to justify an article that's easy to write because it's in the news. Nobody was hurt, I have some recollection that there have been other incidents of this ilk, and I don't buy the "all hijackings are notable" theory. Where's Patrick Smith when you need him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: While it doesn't fall under WP:NOTNEWS, it ''does'' fall under  and has several reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As hijackings get rarer, it adds weight to the case for notability of such hijackings.  is met, and  is a ''guide'', not the be all and end all as to the notability of aviation incidents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AIRCRASH)

Comment: Has coverage in reliable third party sources, to the nominator: Per  I feel that a discussion could have been carried out before an outright deletion here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: This was a hard one to decide as many had strong opinions on this article. I would say keep as this article is cited by reliable sources and subject to featured media sources listed at , this http://world.time.com/2014/02/18/swiss-fighter-jets-grounded-since-ethiopian-hijacking-occurred-outside-business-hours/ source shows in-depth coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: Ethiopian Airlines accidents and incidents. The |guidelines for notability of events state that an event is more likely to be notable if it has a lasting effect, have a wide geographic scope or impact and receive coverage beyond an immediate news cycle. The guidelines specifically state that an article can be both serious and widely, but that this is not in itself a reason for notability. In this case, the hijacking has been widely reported in the current news cycle, but follow-on reporting is relatively minimal and no lasting effect (in the sense of analysis or follow on discussion/action) is (as yet) apparent. The guidelines |encourage patience before creating an article and, in this case, I believe that is wise counsel. Until the topic clearly becomes notable a redirect to the broader article about incidents at the airline seems appropriate
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:ANTICIPATION)

Comment: I'm leaning towards keep, until the full impact of the incident is clearer once the media hype settles down. I believe it is notable and would stand up to  in its current form far moreso than other uncontested articles such as 2014 748 Air Services HS 748 crash. Aside from the rarity of hijackings by crew, the incident involved authorities and a military escort from several nations as well as significant disruption to European air travel. The incident also highlights concerns raised by many within the aviation industry about the installation of locks on cockpit doors post September 11, 2001 intended as a safety measure which has quite possibly contributed to more accidents and incidents than it has prevented
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)