Deletion of Windows Server 2012 R2

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Let's analyse this for a second. Claiming that this will definitely be notable now is a violation of CRYSTAL. Stating that it will definitely be significantly independent of the original version is a violation of CRYSTAL. Stating that it should be kept in a standalone article because of Windows Server 2008 R2 is a violation of . However, it is confirmed, so, at least for now, it should have a place in the main WS2012 article. This will negate any need for original research or speculative content (note: I'm not saying those should be happening) whilst still being encyclopedic. If it turns out that 2012 R2 is significantly independent, then we can always split it out later
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)