Deletion of Robert E. Brister

Comment: to USS Brister. Fails  (Ensign lost at sea having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and . No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: to USS Brister per above. Doesn't pass for a stand alone article, but the content will improve the target article, be less fragmented, and give the content more readership. Per , ''"Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article."'' &nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: A warship was named after him which is a "''significant award or honor'' and so passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: to USS Brister. Clearly doesn't come close to meeting , and doesn't come close to meeting .  And there is really nothing to merge. This is a perfect example of why having a ship named after you is not a sign of notability, but simply a result politicking.  Any man/woman who serves their country's armed forces is to be lauded, but this man simply died during that service. Tragic, but not notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOLDIER)