Deletion of Peter A. McCullough

Comment: under criterion 2 (editor nominating blocked for posting the same legal threat and for having previously disrupted the page in question); and also per , per the above, since it is beyond doubt that this person is indeed notable (this suggests criterion 3 as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: The subject of the article most certainly meets notability criteria, and I do not see any breaches of the  or  policies (at least none that could not be fixed through editing and would warrant deletion). The thinly-veiled legal threat is also disconcerting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The article meets every aspect of : the subject has received significant coverage, the subject is notable, and the sources used are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject. That the subject apparently doesn't like reliably-sourced facts about their public activities does not signify with respect to Wikipedia policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  and because... that's... not how Wikipedia works. Don't want your Wikipedia biography to say you said controversial things? Don't say controversial things. I don't even think we could justify deletion under  given the ''multiple'' things he's said that have received coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:BLP1E)