Deletion of Minicraft

Comment: Clearly passes the |general notability guideline and  with flying colors. Just take a look at the extensive independent refs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: the page is on a Wikipedia:Notability#Events|very topical subject and thus does not have longevity of the encyclopedic worthiness to distinguish it from Wikipedia:IINFO#IINFO|indiscriminate adding of information, particularly in it's lack of Wikipedia:Notability_(events)#The_coverage|depth and duration of coverage. Possible future developments are hat_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball|speculative, we could say that many things '''could''' become notable but what matters is if they '''are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Help:Watchlist (WP:W)

Comment: I'd say  should have been applicable. However, Wikipedia's guidelines are biased towards content reliably sourced, and reliable sources in this case are biased to cover Persson's game instead of 890 other games from the competition. It certainly seems unfair and |systematic bias is a big problem, but we ought not compromise Wikipedia principles. The content is verifiable and reliably sourced to satisfy  at is simplest form. Also, I think there's too much sourced content to merge, so an independent article is fine. —&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1EVENT||WP:BIAS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per the above. This is where his other Ludum Dare entries are, and I agree with Dishmcds' statement regarding the longevity of the coverage. Also, I ''don't'' think it passes  because the sources imply this was notable for about one day. If MiniTale is released and fits the criteria for notability, then '''merge this into MiniTale''' instead
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Easily passes  and as stated above this does seem to be an |"I don't like it therefore delete!" nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)