Deletion of Nemhain (band)

Comment: they are not blogs but are in fact reliable sources that show that the band does pass  particularly with the references to offline sources such as The Virgin Encyclopedia of Rock (assuming ), imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AGF)

Comment: I do not see the sources as a tipping point to WP:GNG. However, a more pressing problem, that has existed since 2009, is that the sourcing and notability were questioned with tags and never addressed. Assuming we |assume all good faith on the off-line sourcing, it did not solve the issues of potential and possible  |original research, that would be a direct result of a lack of proper sourcing and |inline citations. I also "assume" that approximately 29 unsourced paragraphs might be a tad too many for a |'''BLP related''' article. I deleted all the unsourced material leaving an actual stub. Now we can make judgement calls on notability without being in violation of multiple WP:policies and guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:OR||WP:INLINE||WP:BLP)

Comment: Due to failing  and  since 99% of the references are personal blogs or primary sources and there isn't the multiple reliable in-depth reviews of their music to warrant an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBAND)