Deletion of Frank McCoubrey

Comment: I believe he makes the grade under #Politicians as it includes 'members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city' whilst the notoriety of the incident involving the UDA 'show of strength' and the resulting news coverage also help. However, point taken about the lack of sources which I will now endeavour to fix
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I have checked all the references added by Keresaspa, and I find only one article which is substantially about McCoubrey: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/910559.stm this BBC story. This http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/Shankill-39most-deprived-area-in.3835096.jp story from the Newsletter is not about MCoubrey, it is about The Shankill, though half of it is quotes from McCoubrey (he's the only person quoted). #Politicians lists "Major local political figures '''who have received significant press coverage'''. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city." (emphasis added by me). A #cite_note-note6-6|footnote adds:Generally, a person who is "part of the enduring historical record" will have been written about, in depth, independently in multiple history books on that field, by historians. A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists. An actor who has been featured in magazines has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple magazine feature articles, by magazine article writers. An actor or TV personality who has "an independent biography" has been written about, in depth, in a book, by an independent biographer. I don't see any evidence yet that McCoubrey "has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: per  (thanks to Keresaspa's sources, I think the necessary coverage is established), bolstered by the (non-policy, non-guideline) portion of  that says "precedent has tended to favour keeping members of the main citywide government of major, internationally famous metropolitan cities
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OUTCOMES)