Deletion of DownThemAll! (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets  with |significant coverage from |independent |reliable sources. Note that  doesn't exclude product reviews, and whether coverage is "routine" is only a consideration for  and , which don't apply to this article. —&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:IS||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: I agree with Newslinger - the subject specific notability guidelines quoted here that do not apply and their shortcuts are: Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) (NPRODUCT) Wikipedia:Notability (events) (ROUTINE), plus NSOFTWARE is an essay (there is no software guideline), and there's no basis in policy, guideline, essay for browser extensions being inherently non-notable or requiring a higher bar per MILL, in fact we have many such articles that have been kept at AfD so the consensus is that other ones are, so they can be notable ( applies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Weak Keep) There's enough review sources for . (https://www.downthemall.org/development/bloggers/spread-dta/press-says/ lists enough sources for clear GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)