Deletion of Mayoral elections

Comment: There are also a ton of articles on gubernatorial elections which were created as substance-free  violations and have remained that way.  By dwelling on a particular office and not another, are we once again pushing an artificial pecking order
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: It is unreasonable to expect a consensus out of such a granular-level nomination--one editor counted 271 nominations from multiple cities and jurisdictions.  I appreciate the editor making a  nomination yet I hope that rather than piling more on to this one that a more controlled approach is taken.  Heck, I might want to delete all of them... but in smaller, easier to manage bundles please
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: Oakland, Sacramento, San Francisco, Oklahoma City as major cities likely to have further coverage. '''Delete or Redirect''' others to List of mayors of Boise, Idaho, List of mayors of St. Petersburg, Florida, List of mayors of Spokane, San_Bernardino,_California#Mayors etc. Largely bulk-created using only primary source of results without discussion or significant coverage for notability; we are not Ballotpedia or OurCampaigns. Per , can be covered in main articles/lists until separate page is warranted but data only does not justify standalone articles for small cities and suburbs with local-only news coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: There are to many disparate articles of differing levels of quality and detail to be handled as a mass AfD. Some of these are reasonable candidates for deletion but many aren't. A more thorough review per  and a split by city may be the best way to proceed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)