Deletion of Prudence Murphy

Comment: non-trivial coverage in the Sydney Morning Herald, a major Australian newspaper, as well as independent coverage from Art Monthly means that this article meets the , in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: if it can be watched and defended from self-promotion and stuff (as there is at least one COI editor in the edit history).  I don't know about which art galleries are notable and stuff, but I do think http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/photographer-relishes-close-shave/2007/11/12/1194766585261.html this reference (currently included as an EL, not inline citations) should help, as it's from ''Syndney Morning Herald'', which AFAIK is a major newspaper.  I know  doesn't list that as a criterion, but to be honest (full disclosure here)  is a guideline that I believe is too strict
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)