Deletion of Weapons in science fiction

Comment: I think it might be possible for there to be an article around this general topic (e.g. "Views of Weaponry by Futurists" etc) but such an article would have to be about compiling sociology or theoretical engineering research, citing published scholarly works on those subjects.  This is very much NOT such an article.  This strikes me most under the heading of |Wikipedia is not for things made up one day as it's clearly original research from beginning to end.  Rayguns have their own article, as to several other objects and topics linked in this arbitrary compilation, so no one is losing information by deleting this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: Seems like  to me, and is unsourced.  As a topic, it's a bit random/haphazard.  I could see wikipedia having a page on this topic--if and only if there are multiple quality sources that have written specifically about the topic as a whole as a topic in and of itself--and not just mentioned various weapons in science fiction in isolation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: and continue improving. I feel the general consensus here is that the article has notability and can be made encyclopedic, but is just stumbling over the best way to do it. This then becomes a matter for discussion and cooperation on the article's talk page and between editors with  and continued improvement. A deletion would not improve wiki. A better article will
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)