Deletion of Doug Roulstone

Comment: The nominators argument for deletion is based in "inherent non-notability", which is not supported by .  For sources, please see the following http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=2ndcong30m&date=20061030 article in ''Seattle Times'' and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?tab=wn&hl=en&q=%22Doug+Roulstone%22+-wikipedia&ie=UTF-8 198 other news results for "Doug Roulstone
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: under current  standards, though I guess pending what editors decide about certain arguments in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{{1|Roy C. Strickland}}}|Roy C. Strickland debate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)