Deletion of Greek Cypriots v. TRNC and HSBC Bank USA

Comment: as it appears now, it passes per .  The average district court cases does not get this kind of international coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: The rationales for deletion are inadequate because they are .  Whether the title is correct is not relevant under  ("Some articles have well-written text and references. But the one thing poor about them is the title. There is a simple solution to this: rename it!").  There are ''some'' reliable sources like Courthouse News, ABC News, and the Telegraph; the objection is to their quantity.  But the fact that there only a few reliable sources rather than a bevy is insufficient for deletion under  and also misunderstands notability per  and  ("If it is likely that significant coverage in independent sources can be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate" and "Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate citation.").  So I think there's no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:RUBBISH||WP:RUBBISH||WP:MUST||WP:NRV)