Deletion of Task Force to Overcome Racism in Topeka

Comment: as NN, , possible .  Let's review.  We've got a nearly completely-unsourced article, written in an unencyclopedic essay style, describing an ephemeral outfit with only 31 unique G-hits (almost all of which is this article and various Wikimirrors), with a heap of external links that are either broken or which don't actually mention this outfit.  The author admitted himself that it was very difficult to describe from NPOV, that "This article comes from a primary source, namely the author. Extensive searches of the web have uncovered nothing on this topic so this is a Wikipedia exclusive," and that the article was not finished ... ''and that was three years ago.''  There are so many grounds for deletion it's a pick and choose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:COI)

Comment: as an admittedly (per the article) ineffectual organization that did not achieve notability. Noting that the author, {{user|Montanean}}, had some  problems (a college staff member writing an article about that college), it seems likely this is similar and written from personal experience or primary sources. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:ATT)