Deletion of Masaki Kito

Comment: I am somewhat reluctant about this since I suspect that the user who started this article, Mk08111, is likely related to the subject. Also, the article is a mess. But the fact is I have seen Kito on television many times as a commentator and he does specialize in what the article says he specializes in: cult incidents and consumer fraud cases. There are a number of articles centered on him: http://dw.diamond.ne.jp/articles/-/2775, http://sankei.jp.msn.com/economy/news/131213/its13121309000000-n1.htm, http://www.asahi.com/showbiz/nikkan/NIK201212180012.html, http://hochi.yomiuri.co.jp/feature/entertainment/topics/news/20100424-OHT1T00038.htm?from=livedoor, http://diamond.jp/articles/-/46136, etc. He also appears in other articles as the leading lawyer for some plaintiff, such as in the Agura Bokujo case http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/e-japan/tochigi/feature/utunomiya1371865499248_02/news/20130622-OYT8T00350.htm or in the Unification Church case http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20131224-00000058-dal-ent or the Kinmirai Tsushin case http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2006/12/21/national/kinmirai-tsuushin-declared-bust-2/. He's also often sought out by news organizations for expert opinion on Aum Supreme Truth http://snsoku.net/news/2323219, mind control http://www.tokyo-sports.co.jp/eyecatch/127777/, or other cases http://www.asahi.com/showbiz/nikkan/NIK201009180018.html. The article already cites some English articles that note his role as a lawyer. I'm sure I could find more if I go through the newspaper databases. The article needs to be cleaned up, especially with regard to , but he passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:GNG)