Deletion of Melissa Miles McCarter

Comment: Fails . Very very obscure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: WorldCat only lists one self-published book by her, held in two libraries; the other four things on the list of "books" in this article are either non-books or even more obscure than that. More to the point, I didn't find any published independent reviews of any of them. So  seems out of reach and the article doesn't present any case for any other form of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: as per nom. Does not pass  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG)

Comment: Completely, undoubtedly fails , and three online articles from local news outlets does not a notable subject make. Edit: My stance on this matter remains the same after the article's update; please see my comment below for elaboration. Edit 2: Keeping up with this is getting out-of-hand, as the article at this point is , making individually addressing the citations like addressing Gish gallop; the subject is still not notable, and throwing absurd amounts of references that fail to satisfy the  and  does not change that. See also: , and especially 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:CITEKILL||WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NOTEBOMB||WP:BOMBARD)