Deletion of Malal

Comment: while I don't quite share the fervor of my fellow editor above, the article cites no sources independent from the game manufacturer (This gets old but The codexes, White Dwarf magazine, Fanatic magazine (this specific one), and the fiction are all published by Games workshop) to establish notability per the .  The article covers the fictional god of a faction in a miniatures game and falls squarely into the "backstory" category.  Knowledge of the crowded pantheon of gods is not required to play 40K, EPIC or Dawn of War--even within the fictional universe of 40K, the significance of this subject is marginal.  Outside the magic circle, significance is nil.  Delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: no assertion of notability via non-trivial coverage by |reliable sources independent of the topic. Fails #PLOT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT)