Deletion of John B. Caddell

Comment: based on a review of other naval support vessel articles; it does indeed seem like so long as a ship article meets , then the fact it was a commissioned naval vessel automatically passes . If this were not the case, you'd have to nominate 90% of :Category:Oilers of the United States Navy for deletion, although the category includes many well-written articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:GNG)

Comment: per long established practice that commissioned naval vessels are almost certainly capable of sustaining a stand-alone article. Loss through Hurricane Sandy adds to that notability.  is easily met here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Agree with nom that inherited notability is not sufficient reason to keep per .  The one notable part of the article, the "Hurricane Sandy grounding" paragraph, is relatively short and well-sourced, so it could be merged to Hurricane Sandy along with a redirect to guide anyone using the ship's name as a search term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERIT)

Comment: Ship both notable for being a commissioned ship and meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)