Deletion of List of Unificationists

Comment: what is the deletion standard (in terms of notability and/or encyclopaedic content) for stand-alone lists? I see many 'List of episodes of XXX' or 'List of characters of XXX' articles for many topics, almost ubiquitously without sourcing, and many of which have main articles (on 'XXX') that are of very marginal notability and very minimal sourcing. Is there a consistent standard, or is it merely case-by-case  on the list in question
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: The list can easily be improved upon by adding a citation to a secondary / source for every entry on the list. See List of Scientologists for a list that is maintained better, with a citation to a secondary source for every entry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: I have begun to do a bit of cleanup on the list. I will work to add a secondary / source for each entry
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)