Deletion of Zorua and Zoroark

Comment: I looked through the sources in Reception, and they are all just lists. Definitely not the coverage needed for  or 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFICTION)

Comment: per  and . However, the lack of an individual character's popularity does not necessarily equate to lack of notability and so is the inverse, per . Sometimes their lack of popularity is precisely why independent and reliable secondary sources have covered that aspect, and that is what we are supposed to be looking for per . Anyway, "the Pokemon Test" is a mere essay and not at all useful for discussions about the notability of fictional topics since  is the only relevant guideline. The contents of the essay itself acknowledged that the criteria it proposes have long since fallen out of use, if it was ever accepted as a form of consensus
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD||WP:POPULARITY||WP:GNG)