Deletion of Scorio

Comment: per Drmies' findings — this doesn't have any significant coverage from reliable sources.  "|If a topic has no reliable sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I don't see a reason why scorio should not be relevant for wikipedia, while other music notation programs such as Finale (software)|Finale or Lilypond certainly are. For users who want to learn about music notation software and compare it, an appropriate article is really helpful. I agree with  that the number of reliable sources is limited, but this is not very surprising to me as the scorio web site seems to have started only a few months ago, compared to Finale (more than 20 years!). Furthermore as stated above scorio seems to be more than "yet another music scorewriter" as it integrates score writing and sharing within a web community. In conclusion I would favor to keep the article and reopen an AfD discussion within a few months in case the number of reliable sources does not increase
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)