Deletion of Michael Skolnik

Comment: because the article needs a fundamental re-write to make it comply with , which is why I originally nominated it for 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:G11)

Comment: per nomination. The article, by the way, was created and improved, if one dare use the word,  by a |single-purpose account
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: There's plenty of sources, but I agree that most lack the depth of . But  says: "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". I see significant coverage in two sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/nyregion/michael-skolnik-political-director-for-russell-simmons-fights-for-civil-rights.html NYTimes and https://thegrio.com/2014/04/03/meet-michael-skolnik-the-colorblind-civil-rights-activist/ The Grio. When combined with ''lots'' of mentions in discussions of national legislation and social debates, this is more than sufficient for that standard
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC)