Deletion of List of attacks committed during the Second Intifada

Comment: per nom.  In any Asymmetric warfare|asymmetrical conflict the nature of the atrocities carried out by the two sides will naturally be distinctive to each; this page represents a very obvious gerrymander calculated to produce a one-sided list.  Tewfik and Leifern's defenses against this charge – i.e., that it's not for us to "create balance" – are cute but uncompelling.   An equal and opposite gerrymander could easily be contrived, as everyone here knows: List of war crimes committed during the Second Intifada, List of violations of the Geneva conventions and international law during the Second Intifada, Forms of collective punishment during the Second Intifada, Illegal land confiscation during the Second Intifada and so on.  I'm not a fan of -violations, so I won't go and create any of these propaganda articles to balance the propaganda article we're discussing, but we may rest absolutely assured that the various policy principles invoked here by partisan editors to justify ''this'' propaganda article would be summarily if selectively jettisoned were any of ''those'' articles to be created.  Let's have a little candor here shall we
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: I do hope my argument wasn't mistaken for an |OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument.  My point in invoking hypothetical articles analogous to this one was not to say that we'd need those for balance, much less to say that because those don't exist this shouldn't, but rather to demonstrate what's wrong with ''this'' article to good-faith editors whose political views may be clouding their judgment, or who might indeed be unaware of the underlying politics in "lists" such as this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)