Deletion of Star Wars Technical Commentaries (2nd nomination)

Comment: Fails ; does not establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per , though I guess I can't see much harm in a redirect to TheForce.Net either, since that's the site that hosts it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: How do you address the fact that this article contains no |reliable sources? TheForce.Net is well-sourced material; the suggested merge material is not. Perhaps it would be sufficient -- or, at least, most appropriate given the lack of sources -- not to merge but instead ensure the the TFN article mentions hosting the SWTC and adding (if it's printed in a cross-sections book) mention of the cross-sections book referring to/acknowledging SWTC influence
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: What happened to  and how did this get passed a first nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per nominator, I feel this fails  as notability is not reasonably established
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)