Deletion of Irfan Sazzad

Comment: I'm confused. The nomination states that the subject barely passes . A topic that passes GNG (and doesn't violate Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|what Wikipedia is not) is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article. So why is this at AfD? Seems a tad |bitey to A7 it 20 minutes after it was created, and take it to AfD hours later, despite several editors pitching in to improve it. It sounds like a '''speedy keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BITE)

Comment: The sources cited in the article and those identified above show that the topic meets  and . Nom has advanced no coherent rationale for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)