Deletion of Gracy Title Company

Comment: Given the information that the original article was speedy deleted while in the process of being created and edited,  I think the request to '''salt''' this article (made in the original nomination) is extreme and unnecessary.  No evidence has been offered to suggest that the author would not comply with the consensus of this process.  Nor is it  to use information provided by the company as long as the information itself was an independent |reliable source.  It would be helpful if some would more ''discuss'' here than try so hard to ''dismiss'' the comments of others.  Consensus is often difficult enough without starting the conversation with a bite
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:RS)

Comment: The topic has enought reliable source material to support a stand alone article under . The article for the acquiring company can include a Wikipedia:Summary style section for Gracy Title Company
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)