Deletion of World Technology Award

Comment: Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources: https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-100867280.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-109860743.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-125332402.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-270771820.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-141754024.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-126692205.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-117280657.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-222151964.html, https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1N1-106D5ACB4DCE327F.html. Please note that, through redirects, this article covers three related topics: World Technology Award, World Technology Network and World Technology Summit. A finding of notability of any of these topics is reason to keep the article. Although this is not direct evidence of notability, please note that this article has dozens of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=World+Technology+Award&namespace=0 incoming links many from highly notable subjects. Deleting this article, even if consensus finds it to be a non-notable topic, would create a lot of redlinks and this would not be an improvement for the encyclopedia. There is a lot of tagged and poorly cited or uncited material. The article can be improved to correct this but even if this is an |immediate concern deletion of the article is not necessary; The offending material can be deleted from the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:NODEADLINE)

Comment: An award cannot inherit notability from its winner. I could start an award myself and present it to existing noble laureates and claim that only the best receive it. It requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources discussing it. I do not see that here. We need sources which are independent of the awarding organisations and independent of the winner. This is a recurring event and if truly notable, there would have been multiple reliable sources covering it over an extended period of time (). That is clearly not satisfied here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)