Deletion of Daniel Chavez Moran

Comment: there is some coverage, but I'm not sure it rises the level expected for a BLP. Much of the article's content is completely unsourced because the subject simply hasn't received enough coverage for things like his higher education to be verifiable. Some of the sources themselves are a bit weak too - I'm not sure that a very short profile in a list of ''"The most powerful investors in tourism"'' counts for much. It's coverage, but probably not "significant coverage". I'd probably need to see one more solid source to get me over the line. The |paid editing conflict of interest is obviously a concern too and it probably doesn't help that we've had a lot of that here lately. I remain open to being convinced, but at the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)