Deletion of List of Coast to Coast AM affiliates

Comment: As I said above,  is not just about "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics", it also clearly states Wikipedia isn't meant to be an "electronic program guide". Same question for all who think we should keep this: "do you think we should make these kinds of lists for every radio and TV show
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: WP:NOTDIRECTORY, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE)

Comment: Thanks for assuming good faith, I put the list up for speedy deletion because I honestly thought it might have been a copyright violation. I was reading some talk pages and other people had that same concern. And in fact, the admin who reviewed the speedy deletion agreed with me and deleted the article. Now, you disagreed and I've read some other comments on talk page that make me think you're probably right. Still, I don't think a list of radio stations that air a radio show should get its own article. Maybe I should have been more clear, but one of the things  says, wikipedia isn't, is an "electronic program guide". And this is in fact a sort of a reverse electronic program guide. Instead of listing all the radio shows for one radio station, we list all the radio stations for one radio show. Can I ask you a question, do you think every single radio and TV show should get a list of all the TV and radio stations that air it? Would you think it'd be appropriate if we made lists like "list of tv stations airing Lost" or "list of radio stations airing Rush Limbaugh"? Also, the reason I said, "this content is available elsewhere" was to make clear that the article wasn't of much practical use either and that the world could do without it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)