Deletion of Hollie Steel (3rd nomination)

Comment: Quite clearly a case of . It's quite possible she'll gain inependent notability in the future but  makes it quite clear that has no bearing right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: There is nothing in  or  that suggests subject is sufficiently notable for an article, and 1E rules against whatever notability arises from being an unsuccessful contestant. Wikipedia is not the place for items of ephemeral interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:MUSIC||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Passes  #9: "Has won or placed in a major music competition."   Passes : we're not talking cat-up-a-tree stuff here.  Passes  with a lot of international media coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:1E)

Comment: Of a disruptive nomination.  Returning an article to AfD over and over, and repeating ad nasuem the same delete arguments over and over, simply because one is unhappy that it was not deleted on previous occasions, is the worst sort of repeat disruptive nomination and meets the definitions of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: How does ''"one of ten finalists on the third series of the ITV reality show"'' imply notability? The subject obviously fails , falls under  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO||WP:ONEVENT||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Britain's Got Talent (Series 3). She isn't notable besides her BGT participation. Unlike some people that have played small roles in TV shows appeared in a number of ads, or won a National Dancing Competition beforehand. Also, her placement is not high enough to qualify per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Most of the references are tabloids, definitely not the most reliable sources, and what has been stated by them was later refuted by the subject of the article, see Talk:Hollie Steel|the talkpage now. I would support a few sentences in the contest article on her, but moving her entire article over there would be . ''If'' she later goes on to make a career in music and meets our criteria for general notability or music, I would hold no prejudice against recreating the article, but at this point we are grasping at straws to talk about what she will become. I do not however see her as meeting the criteria for inclusion at this time
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)