Deletion of List of council leaders in the United Kingdom

Comment: This is the kind of thing that seemed like a good idea in theory, but has proven to be largely unmaintainable in actual practice. Although Epluribusunumyall raised US and Canadian examples above, they aren't actually helpful as reasons why this should exist. The US list is based on a specific population-rank cutoff that keeps the list manageable and updatable because it's expressly confined to being a list of just 50 people total, and the US does ''not'' have ''any'' lists of "every currently-serving mayor in an entire state regardless of city or town size" — and while Canada does have lists by province or territory that allow all mayors of every city and town in that province or territory to be listed without size restrictions, there's no editor commitment to keep on top of them in a timely fashion: the big cities whose politics get broad nationalizing media coverage and attention do get updated promptly when there's a mayoral change, but the small towns that receive little extralocal attention at all regularly get overlooked. So their existence isn't a reason why this should also be kept: per , in reality those lists should probably also be deleted due to their maintainability problems.The value in such a list vests entirely in our ability to keep it ''accurate'' and ''current''. If we can't do that, we shouldn't try to curate a dynamically evolving list we can't adequately maintain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: article needs to be updated to reflect recent changes in council boundaries/elections, but is relevant and notable in chronicalling local leaders throughout the united kingdom. see example in other countries such as List of mayors of the 50 largest cities in the United States| United States or List of current mayors in British Columbia| British Columbia. obsviously different nations follow different electoral systems so there are differences in how they are classified, but council elections in the united kingdom are rather important events politically and the elected members of such bodies do have significant responsibility. for these reasons the article should be kept. Also seems to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTPEOPLE)

Comment: For starters  applies as a lot of the names have no articles. Secondly, there is no clear reasoning why different definitions of a ''council leader'' are used in each of the entries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTPEOPLE)