Deletion of Bobby Bradley

Comment: Coverage from reliable sources establishes .  shouldn't be thrown around as a reason to delete when there is coverage that is non-routine.  needs to be actually read before attempting to be applied to an AFD discussion, instead of reading the definition of the word http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/routine routine on Wikitionary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Seven sources that discuss the subject, some in more detail than others, but certainly sufficient to establish GNG for this former top prospect (Baseball America rated him #20 in the country, he participated in the All-Star Futures Game). The sources certainly do not cover him in a  way; that would be game recaps, mainly. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: passes . He was named a High School All-American, which passes  in principle
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCOLLATH)

Comment: per Muboshgu above - signicant coverage in several reliable sources spanning a seven year period is more more than enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Promising minor-leaguer bombs out after 5-6 injury-plagued years. Available sources indicate that he ''might'' have become notable had he stayed healthy. But he did not. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as Muboshgu states, he meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)