Deletion of RAF Krendi

Comment: the sources added in the last few days seem sufficient to suggest it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: With no surprise within 2 seconds of searching I found combined significant coverage from the Imperial War Museum and ''The Malta Independent''. http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205209074http://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2011-05-01/local-news/The-Royal-Air-Force-And-Malta-(1918-1978)-291495.  I don't believe for a second  was adhered to.  Why was an article about an air force base AfD'd only about 2 1/2 hours after article creation? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RAF_Krendi&type=revision&diff=791617263&oldid=791601152
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: I believe that this satisfies the  now. Regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes on GNG,(7), and probably  (Most british bases had housing and were sparate legal entities). The base hosted a few squadrons, up to aroung a wing, of spitfires thus exceeding the squadron level cutoff. Plenty of book references found in quick before in google books, deletion is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILUNIT||WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Subject fails . I see no criterion for bases. Further, once you strip out the fan sites there's not much left for general notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILNG)