Deletion of Race and intelligence (history)

Comment: I too suspect an ulterior motive of POV censorship.  These articles seem to have plenty of notability and sourcing.  If fewer articles can do the job of all these then create them first in a process of merge/redirect.  |AFD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT)

Comment: mdash; All notable topics and with  references. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: There is a lot of good, sourced information in these pages and deleting them is throwing out the baby with the bathwater.  As far as I can tell, these are more  subarticles than POV forks.  While perhaps this all could be cut down a bit, there is much information that would be lost by deleting these articles, and if we want to use the content at all delete/merge is forbidden by the GFDL, as has been noted above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: Normally a  tag, not fD, is the place to request article mergers. Controversial topics are inherent troll magnets and our commitment to an open encyclopedia that is #censored means that we cannot delete |verifiable articles on |notable topics simply because the topics are controversial and have attracted ANDAL|vandals. If we started deleting articles just because they were vandalized too often, vandals would start hacking into articles they didn't like in droves in hopes if they were persisitent enough we'd give up and delete the ones they didn't like as well. |We don't want to encourage them. Best
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:MERGE||WP:A||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:N||WP:VANDAL||WP:BEANS)