Deletion of Kyle Reed

Comment: per . Sources listed are  coverage. Article seems to be http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kyle_Reed&oldid=244134533 created to fill a redlink on Template:SJSUSpartansQuarterback|this template. A low bar for inclusion indeed. Of that list, only Deberg and Garcia meet the  criteria, IMHO, though others might differ. Several of those pages are BLP offenders and should face deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:ROUTINE||WP:NSPORT)

Comment: Delete for meeting neither WP:NSPORT nor WP:GNG.  I agree with others that the coverage is |routine. Even if consensus were to be undecided if the coverage is significant,  |common sense needs to prevail and guidelines should |not be merely followed if it does not improve Wikipedia.  Instead of blindly counting the number of significant sources, look at what the sources say.  They say he is only famous for transferring schools and little else, which is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:COMMONSENSE||WP:IAR)

Comment: per the sources that Cbl62 has presented above which clearly demonstrate that Reed passes the |general notability guideline. The |SNGs, of which  is one, are supplementary guidelines and should generally be used as indicators for whether the subject will meet the GNG. While it is fine to disagree about whether the subject meets GNG, it is ridiculous to argue that someone meets GNG but fails NSPORTS and should therefore be deleted when the lead of NSPORTS contains "This guideline is used to help evaluate whether or not a sportsperson ... will meet the general notability guideline" and "Failing to meet the criteria in this guideline means that notability will need to be established in other ways (e.g. the general notability guideline, or other, topic-specific, notability guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SNG||WP:NSPORTS)