Deletion of Lisa Lavie (2nd nomination)

Comment: per the nominator's and FRF's convinving arguments. Create a '''redirect''' to We Are the World 25 for Haiti (YouTube edition) - whatever legitimate notability the subject may have is BLP1E-ish, and stems from her involvement in this video; while I'd usually suggest a merge, the content here simply isn't suitable for excerpting a brief, relevant bio, which needs to be redone from scratch. Userfy on request, but the primary author really needs to understand 's lessons before attempting a rewrite
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:BOMBARD)

Comment: And userify to the author's userspace for later inclusion.  in my opinion. I disagree that the subject meets  in any way. What coverage there is seems trivial, aggregate or secondary of the subject herself, so no #1. Being a backup singer to Yanni does not meet #4 or #6. #9 is not met either because YouTube is not a music competition. #12 is not met because whatever coverage there was was in aggregate to the video that she appeared in, not for herself. Artist has not charted, and has not released a record through a major label. iTunes doesn't count. The Streamy Awards is mentioned, but obviously she didn't receive one, she was a backup singer for another artist that also didn't receive the award, she just performed. All in all, the article is probably 90% puffery and excessive referencing. The 10% that's left at the end doesn't really qualify for  at this point. If the article is removed and userified, and at some point in the future the subject meets the notability guidelines, I'd recommend the author be a lot more honest about how the bio is structured and sourced. Someone who is truly notable hardly requires that level of |reference overload
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:GNG||WP:BOMBARD)

Comment: I agree with the nominator.  isn't met because the most reliable sources give insubstantial coverage, and the dubious/bloggy/exceedingly local ones give the most substantial coverage. |Articles on living persons simply require more solid sourcing, and claims that any accomplishment is encyclopedically or biographically significant need the same. Yanni doesn't help this subject  anything without a durable (cf. occasional) |ensemble membership, and being broadcast on TV in and of itself isn't necessarily worth mentioning, especially if the subject is otherwise obviously notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:BLP||WP:INHERIT||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: 1) Lead has been updated ''http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Lavie&oldid=546896451 here'' to summarize notability. (2) Article presents detailed factual biography of one of the earliest subjects to successfully use the Internet outside old-line music labels, a detailed task for which numerous references were necessary over four years--''not'' to demonstrate threshold notability, nor for ombardment. (3) Re: YouTube: (3a) Please guard against dismissing anything YouTube-related based on underlying improper -like assumptions; (3b) the article's YouTube cites are ''generally'' (i) permissible primary-source uses of ''archives'' of subject's channel or YouTube front page to put subject's YouTube channel statistics in historical perspective and for front page features; (ii) some "official" YouTube channels' videos; (iii) to  bare facts such as particular performances--''not'' as opinionated reviews; and (iv) a couple of subject interviews, openly labeled as such, not cited for truth of their content
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:OTHERCRAP||WP:verify)