Deletion of Scott Brown (chaplain)

Comment: The Chaplain of the Fleet ranks "with a Rear-Admiral", according to http://books.google.ca/books?id=Hwc8fVBsep8C&pg=RA1-PA269&lpg=RA1-PA269&dq=Circular+371+Royal+Navy&source=bl&ots=o6ANjYn6Rd&sig=f_ZG_DmKSth9fBmg-c_heUjH3S8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ww2gUbypPJHxiQKb34G4Aw&ved=0CE8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Circular%20371%20Royal%20Navy&f=false Circular 371, dated 1850(?). This http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/46604/pages/7476/page.pdf 1975 ''London Gazette'' article lumps "Permanent or Pensionable Officers of Flag and General Rank and the Chaplain of the Fleet" together, which implies that hasn't changed. This satisfies  #3. He may also pass #4
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: per a clear pass of  #3, as mentioned above. And the idea that a Royal Navy source can't be used to prove notability is totally wrong
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)