Deletion of Suicide of Ante Šutalo

Comment: There are more than 3 news sources for this and seemed to get sufficient press coverage to warrant an article. While there isn't much  and is mostly local, it is 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DEPTH||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: per ,  and . This is an awful tragedy, but as a recent news story there is no evidence yet that it will have lasting coverage in reliable sources. There appears to be no particular reason to assume that such coverage will eventuate. The sources also look mainly to be specialist news publications, and some may not be reliable. As such, the notability criteria are not met at present. If sustained coverage develops, an article can be recreated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: I find the above rationales for keeping the article persuasive, particularly there being sufficient coverage and it providing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: I think  applies here. For articles about happenings, there needs to be something more than just "coverage" to be notable. There needs to be something unique, something that makes it not just run-of-the-mill. Cyberbullying related suicides are, unfortunately, run-of-the-mill. Nothing about this seems to be at all unique that would justify having a Wikipedia page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)