Deletion of Jill Rubery

Comment: Clear pass of rof. It is hard to understand this AfD nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: as passes #3 and also easily passes #1, having an h-index of 68. I advise the nominator to take a look at other AfDs on academics as they are a specialised area of AfD that can be hard to understand
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF)

Comment: Sigh. She's an elected fellow of the British Academy - "Election as a Fellow of the British Academy recognises high scholarly distinction". That satisfies  criteria 3. Please learn from this, BeenAroundAWhile. The fellowship - an award which you did not spot - was sentence three of the article. This AfD listing is either out of ignorance or malice. I hope the first, but you MUST understand  and what constitutes an award if you are to avoid making regrattable mistakes like this again
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF)

Comment: Seriously twice?  A Fellow of the Academy?  This string of shambolic nominations, from a veteran editor with tens of thousands of edits, blows holes through  and is verging on bad faith.  I strongly advise the nom to cease them at once before matters escalate to ANI
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per  C1 and C3 and  (searching JSTOR for her name finds many reviews of her books) and give BeenAroundAWhile some side-eye for nominating three highly-notable female academics for deletion in quick succession
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)