Deletion of Rules of Acquisition (2nd nomination)

Comment: and clean-up per . I'll also quote The Transhumanist here - "As the episodes of Star Trek have been seen by millions of people, they are all indisputably notable.  The Rules of acquisition have come up again and again, and are a central aspect of the Ferengi way of life, and are prominently featured in dozens of episodes.  They are also the basis for the title of a popular Star Trek book.  This doesn't seem to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) guideline, but at this time the status of that guideline is under dispute - but more importantly, consensus trumps a guideline.  ''|Reliable sources'' is also a guideline, and the community can overrule it.  It's not a trivia section as per  because the items listed forms a logical group.  The article is not indiscriminate, as its subject matter is a specific well-known set of items." This certainly seems to be a notable plot device in the Star Trek series, sources need to be added to address the main concern of nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:RS||WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: WP:V|Verifiable concept that has become |notable through its continued reference in popular culture. Deletion would harm the encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: passes , , , and .   and  are not policies and cannot be used as valid deletion criteria.  The nominator failed to delete last time and he brings no new discussion to the table so I find it hard to believe this nomination is nothing more "I didn't get my way so I'll try again."  In fact, his rationale is "the admin screwed up" despite ignoring that  is a '''GUIDELINE''' not a '''POLICY''' so I don't see how
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NPOV||WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:RS)