Deletion of Police stop, search, detention and arrest powers in the United Kingdom

Comment: as per CaveatLector, TenPound Hammer, RBlowes, Targeman, Espresso Addict, and GorillaWarfare.  Yes, it needs a bit of improvement, but that is ''not'' fD|Grounds for deletion.  I might add a legal disclaimer (a la Allocation questionnaire) or a link to isclaimer|the standard legal disclaimer.  It is Axiom|axionomic that "The law is vast and constantly changing."  I would argue that ''all'' legal articles need to updated periodically.  That is why we have a |WikiProject:Law.  That is also why I have here at WP in the first place -- to help my students.  If we deleted every legal article for the reason that it is out of date, WP would be bereft of legal research, and thus a valuable tertiary source for college (paralegal) and law students.  I am happy to jump in and fix it per |the Heyman doctrine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:D||WP:LAW||WP:HEY)

Comment: on grounds that this is a  fork from various other articles that cover the topic in more detail, inlcuding Stop and search, Detention (imprisonment),Arrest, Anti-terrorism legislation and Public Order Act. No wonder this article could not be maintained as it straddles 5 different Acts of parliament covered in more detail in other articles. This article is an Amalgamation of too many other articles to be of any use, not to mention the problems of maintaining it identified by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:POV)