Deletion of The transit of power in Russia after Vladimir Putin

Comment: per . At this stage only unfounded speculations are available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL)

Comment: acceptable sourced content to 2024 Russian presidential election possibly under a "Problem 2024" subsection. As a political science buff there is intrigue and I would offer interesting information but it is |too soon for a stand alone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: sourced speculations into 2024 Russian presidential election. As the end of Putin's presidency is but one possible outcome,  would suggest that an entire article of speculations should not exist at this stage. Even though it is too soon to create a neutral, well-sourced article on this subtopic, its verifiable contents that have already received significant coverage should be explained in the topic's broader article (which easily complies with the main policies). Additionally, I would suggest renaming this article (if kept) or resulting redirect (if merged/redirected) to Problem 2024 or another shorter, widely-used name; the current ''title'' is not  and would probably not be a very helpful redirect for this reason
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CONCISE)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Putinism.  tells: ''All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced.''. It is properly referenced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL)

Comment: per : ''It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL)