Deletion of Planned presidential transition of Mitt Romney

Comment: Sourcing is enough to pass  and it covers more than any of the merge/redirect targets and shouldn't be merged back into already long articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Most delete arguments in this discussion concede that this article passes  (it looks like there is plenty of coverage in reliable sources). Instead, it appears that the debate is focused on whether this information should be incorporated into the article about Mitt Romney's failed presidential campaign, or whether it should be it's own article. First of all, those kinds of merge discussions are usually hammered out on an article's talk page. Second,  specifically cautions against articles becoming {{tq|"too unwieldy."}} The article for Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 is already very long and merging the entirety of this article would make it far more unwieldy and lengthy. I think a much better option would be to include a very brief summary of the contents of this article at Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012 and then direct readers here with {{see also}} or {{main article}}. For those reasons, I think we should keep this as-is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PAGEDECIDE)

Comment: This is an article about the ''planning'' of an administration, and is |well sourced, and |even more sources have been found by {{U|E.M.Gregory}}. Some editors appear to be scared of cruft, which this is not; rather, our readers will likely search for this article as the major election revs up. It will also make a terrible precedent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: or '''Merge''' per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: possibly merge, to the campaign. It's part of that topic, and insufficently substantial for a  subarticle
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS)

Comment: this was something that the government felt was important enough to invest a good deal of time and money into so it appears to me to meet the GNG with the RSes that cover it. With regard to the merge per  it would make the Romney article unwieldy to put this in that and put a bit much weight on his presidential campaign compared with his governorship and other work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: to Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2012. I've read through the arguments here, and I remain unconvinced that this would meet . When I originally looked through the arguments, I was worried that it would be too much, but to be honest, I feel the most important portions of this article already exist in the main article's Mitt_Romney_presidential_campaign,_2012#.22Readiness_Project.22|readiness project section. I think this article can just be redirected back to the main article and it would be fine
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)