Deletion of Silk Route Museum

Comment: WP:N says ''"if no reliable '''third-party''' sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article."'' So even if a Chinese newspaper cites this museum (so far no such source has been found), if the newspaper is owned by the same government that owns the museum, it would not qualify as a "third party source". Furthermore, ''reliability'' is required under . Newspapers without journalistic standards that are censored by governments are not reliable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: falls foul of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)