Deletion of Olympic Torch (virus hoax)

Comment: The sources in the article are certainly not sufficent to justify keeping this article, per , but two of the articles in the Google News search linked by Cazort (''The Indian Expess'' and ''Wiener Zeitung'') just about seem to get this over the notability bar. I say "reluctant" because I do rather despair that trivial geekery like this always gets people weighing in with "keeps", but I have to fight hard to get Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emure|an article about a town where people live out their whole lives and which has coverage in over 100 books kept, and even then it's only a "no consensus". I know that that's irrelevant to this article, but I had to get it off my chest
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Per , articles ''about'' hoaxes are acceptable, and this definitely reads like an article about a notable hoax covered by 3 independent |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes (WP:HOAX||WP:RS)

Comment: Sources: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ned=us&hl=en&q=%22olympic+torch+virus%22&um=1  This source: http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=4196 mentions that this hoax made the rounds twice in one year, and caused a loss of productivity.  Multiple independent sources written specifically about the topic...that meets otability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)