Deletion of César Luis González

Comment: per , having two streets named after him is a "well-known and significant award or honor." I have also added a commentary source from the Air Force: https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/cct/2014/CCT_02_OCTOBER_2014.pdf Hispanic Airmen Impact Predates Air Force that verifies information in the article and supports notability, including per , i.e. "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:BASIC)

Comment: WP:SOLDIER is an essay and  does not seem to apply here. While some of the uncited stuff probably needs to get backed up with something or get out of the article; AfD is not the same thing as cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: we have to |verify it. I can find three hits in gBooks that mention this fact; two of them are SPSes/vanity publishers that have wording that makes it pretty clear ''they'' sourced from ''us''. The third is an ABC-Clio published book and ''should'' be reliable https://www.google.com/books/edition/Ethnic_and_Racial_Minorities_in_the_U_S/5ufJEa6u3BcC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Cesar+Luis+Gonzalez+first&pg=PA548&printsec=frontcover, but my antennae are twitching as to ''its'' sourcing (i.e. they may have pulled from us...) and it is only a passing mention to boot. I'd really like to see this sort of fact cited multiple places, ''especially'' in "pre-Wikipedia" sources; the fact there don't seem to ''be'' any mentioning this makes me twitch even more. (I'll also note the fact isn't even actually cited in the article or even ''mentioned'' outside the lede.) If somebody can find a source that is both reliably published, pre-dates Wikipedia, and clearly states this fact, I'll happily change to a "full keep", but as it is right now there's merely the ''presumption'' of notability that can only be verified in the weakest of ways. I'm willing to AGF with my !vote here that sources, offline likely, ''exist'', and thus not being a BLP that's ''enough'', but
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)