Deletion of Piper Harron

Comment: she clearly fails  with a two published papers in GS (the first of which has a respectable 25 citations), but she also seems to have had some impact through advocacy. However to fulfill  with her advocacy she would need more than a few blog posts and the fact that she wrote her thesis with lay people in mind. I dont see a wider reception of her thesis in the general press except the https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/roots-of-unity/contrasts-in-number-theory/ Scientific American blog which is still a blog
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: She doesn't meet .All sources are majorly interview no independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Fails , , and . The sources are mainly interviews which do not display the level of independence necessary to establish SIGCOV, or are from non-notable institutions or think tanks with an agenda which is suspect for proving notability in an encyclopedia. Some of them are institutions with direct professional ties to Piper Harron. Ultimately, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:BASIC||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:SIGCOV)