Deletion of Nicky Fish

Comment: per nom. Even if he may technically meet , he so clearly fails  that deleting this article is only |common sense
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:GNG||WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: fails , which is more important than ''technically'' passing . Let's show some 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: taking a look at , we can see no mention of playing cup competitions to grant notability. Only: ''"Players who have appeared, and managers who have managed, in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable"''. Therefore there is no case to argue for this man passing NFOOTBALL - he has not played in such a league - and the article should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: That one league cup match was against a fully pro club, so he meets .  However,  is the #1 priority here and he clearly fails in that area
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Comment''' My '''common sense''' told me to search google, and I came up with http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2366249/Keane-grooms-Smith-as-his-replacement.html this, http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/internationals/wales/3574388.stm this. I'd say he passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG)