Deletion of Transall

Comment: As the nominator failed to notify interested projects and editors per #After nominating: Notify interested projects and editors, I have notified the following: Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)

Comment: and redirect to Transall C-160. First of all, whether a topic is notable is down to sufficient , it has nothing to do with . Second, whether a notable topic gets its own article or shares one with a related (parent/child/sibling) topic is based as much on the size and coherence of the individual subject matter rather than rigid habits (sorry forgot the WP:xxx thing for that). The consortium is clearly notable, but equally clearly it cannot sustain a worthwhile standalone article alongside its sole product. &mdash; Cheers
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Article clearly meets , having significant coverage in several aviation periodicals and books. Please note the article has existed as a stub for nearly 14 years, but was only put up for deletion after recent expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)