Deletion of TORRES (Album)

Comment: per the sources identified by sparklism; subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NALBUMS)

Comment: Meets  through coverage in reliable sources. Pitchfork Media http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/17558-torres/, Drowned in Sound http://drownedinsound.com/releases/17501/reviews/4146117 and No Ripcord http://www.noripcord.com/reviews/music/torres/torres all have reviews and are all listed at /SOURCE as recommended sources for album articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMUSIC||WP:ALBUM)

Comment: per the sources mentioned by Sparklism, and a number of them on the article page from the review box as well. There's enough to pass the . I support Sparklism's article rename as well, it doesn't currently doesn't follow , but his proposed title would
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ALLCAPS)

Comment: This article does meet at least 3 of the criteria on , the minimum number of criteria needing to be met is at least 1. This article does meet ALL of the criteria from the "general notability guideline" on . This album has received significant coverage from many reliable sources, all of which are independent of the subject. — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG)