Deletion of Arnljot Elgsaeter

Comment: Three papers with over 200 citations each, first author on each, and far and away the most cites in a search for "erythrocyte shape", convince me that he passes #C1. Looking for newspaper coverage is pointless and irrelevant as that's not where one expects to find coverage of academics. I improved the referencing of the article; it's still very weak, but a lot better than its previous nonexistent state
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He is a member of Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters which I think makes him notable per #C3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per Arsenikk and Geschichte - fails  as there has not been any valuable coverage in the biggest newspapers in Norway
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)