Deletion of Science and the Bible

Comment: per . This is an |OR fest and should've never been written in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:NUKEANDPAVE||WP:NOR)

Comment: It's a poor article which needs fixing but a notable topic. I'm not clear which of the reasons at -REASON you believe apply. NPOV issues aren't a reason to delete, nor is your opinion about literary criticism (which should be discussed at the article talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: per ; this is badly referenced personal essay. I don't believe it's adding value to the encyclopedia at this time. The topic may be notable but the current execution is too far below what one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. Better to start from a clean slate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: per .  The subject matter could very likely have a good, decently sourced article, but this particular version is most certainly not it.  As mentioned, it just seems like this is someone's personal essay.  While it seems to cite numerous sources, if you actually look into some of them, you'll see that a lot of the sources used are not actually supporting the claims being made, which results in large portions of the article being pure synthesis.  So, in short, while the subject is potentially notable, this article is pretty much unsalvageable, and would need to be completely rewritten from the ground up. Special:Contributions/64.183.45.226|64.183.45.226
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)