Deletion of Daniel Koh

Comment: per Bearcat. Doesn't meet  or the coverage threshold for a local politician to meet . Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Being chief of staff to a mayor is not an -passing role: it's the type of role that might get a person over NPOL #2 ''if'' they can be well-sourced as the subject of enough |reliable source coverage to credibly claim that they're ''special'' cases of significantly ''greater'' notability than most other mayors' chiefs of staff, but not a role that guarantees him a Wikipedia article just because a small handful of purely local coverage exists in the local newspaper where such coverage is merely ''expected''. People also don't get articles just for being unsuccessful candidates in political party primaries, or for being smalltown municipal selectmen, so footnotes #2, 5, 6 and 7 aren't bolstering his notability at all — and the paid-inclusion wedding announcement isn't evidence of notability either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS)