Deletion of ChallengeYou

Comment: Fails . Trivial mention in a notable source and extensive coverage in a non-notable source just doesn't cut it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I think The Guardian is reliable enough, and it seems to be significant coverage. Also, article complete passes Wikipedia policy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The Guardian reference is no more than a paragraph on of the Guardian's blogs. It might be slightly helpful in a larger article about game engine tools. But here it's little more than a trivial mention, which means it isn't enough to meet the inclusion criteria of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: and list at List of multiplayer browser games. I'm looking at . Is the coverage significant? The Guardian - good source, but only two sentences. The Gamer Report - I can't tell if this is a  or a . If I give the benefit of the doubt, that's one item of significant coverage. Per Wikipedia:N#cite_note-3, this is borderline notability and is more suitable for inclusion in a broader article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:SPS||WP:RS)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOTE)