Deletion of Ada of Holland

Comment: per , based on inclusion in the NNBW
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: per  as above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: I am thoroughly unconvinced by the arguments for keeping this article. They mostly boil down to  and . Firstly, that doesn't demonstrate otability. Secondly, notability is not the sole issue here—the fact that this is a purely genealogical article ''in itself'' constitutes a reason to delete it per #14 ({{tq|Any other content Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|not suitable for an encyclopedia}}), specifically because Wikipedia is OTGENEALOGY.{{pb}}That being said, deletion is also not an ideal solution because of the risk for confusion with Ada, Countess of Holland that has been amply demonstrated above, and the further risk of confusion with Ada van Holland (died 1258). There are several possible solutions here. The simplest is to just convert this title to a disambiguation page. Another is to turn this into a redirect somewhere appropriate (I would suggest List of consorts of Brandenburg#Margravine of Brandenburg, 1157–1356 rather than Otto I, Margrave of Brandenburg for reasons outlined at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spouse of the Prime Minister of Singapore and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Grant Bennett) and create Ada of Holland (disambiguation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SOURCESMUSTEXIST||WP:JUSTNOTABLE||WP:N||WP:DELREASON||WP:NOTGENEALOGY)

Comment: and agree per User:Opera hat; passes #3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: She has http://resources.huygens.knaw.nl/retroboeken/nnbw/#source=2&page=10&view=imagePane an entry (though admittedly not a very long one) in the ''Nieuw Nederlandsch Biografisch Woordenboek'' and therefore meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)