Deletion of Transracial (identity)

Comment: This is basically an article about two people, one of whom has a very well developed article about her (including this subject matter). Taking that and tacking on a reference to a Maury Povich Show guest does not a subject make. Fails  outside of discussion of Dolezal, who has her own page. Until there's more academic support or popular usage of this term, it's  for this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: to Ethnic identity development as an alternative to deletion; the subject is not yet independently notable per . Anything useful can be picked up from the article history
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per  and . —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I suspect the arguments against deletion are , whether the commenters realize it or not. The subject has received substantial press coverage. Here are some sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: per  and . Not an well-established term (vast majority of reliable sources using scare quotes). Wikipedia's Rachel Dolezal article says she resigned from her NAACP position and that she committed several lies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:TOOSOON)