Deletion of Stacy Meyer

Comment: The problem is that the real reason this death is notable, the conclusions of those opposed to Scientology who believe that she was murdered or at the very least sent into the vault as punishment, are not |attributable to |reliable sources. Without that, we don't really have an article; she's just someone who died, probably accidentally. Unless we get confirmation through independent secondary sources that her death is worth discussing, we should not have this article, regardless of whether we believe it is nefarious or not. There is simply no reason for us to have an article that summarizes a CALOSHA report
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:RS)

Comment: I sincerely hope that you will not fall for all the non-notable and far-fetched "conspiracy-theorizing"; such is not the stuff of an encyclopedia and it can stay on alt.religion.scientology and ARS-derivative POV websites where it belongs and where those few that are interested can find all the conspiracy theorizing that they care to. That one of these ARS regulars, Keith Henson, fell for the conspiracy theories and broke the law adds little notability. The only real issue to decide here is if the local coverage in one newspaper meets the requirements of . I will not tell you how to decide that but simply mention that, yes, an accidental worker fatality in what must be a somewhat mysterious Scientology compound in a quiet area of the Inland Empire (California)|Inland Empire would get some local attention. Compare a recent situation where three divers perished while wreck diving on the USS Spiegel Grove (LSD-32)|Spiegel Grove. That got a lot of press attention locally and even nationally and lots of notice in the dive community, a community much larger by several orders of magnitude than the Scientology critic community. Did that make the dead divers; Kevin Coughlin, Jonathan Walsweer, or Scott Stanley; notable? Is Stacy Meyer notable? Or is it simply Scientology and criticism of Scientology that are notable?; areas that are well-represented here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: WP:NOT - What Wikipedia is NOT - #6. News Reports. The article starts off with how she died. The only significant amount of information contained in this article is the investigation. That is the definition of a ''news report''. Looking through the article history, it also appears that the intention of this article may have been  based on all the apparent attempts to blame the cause of death on Scientology
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: This death was discussed in |reliable sources, so it should be included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)