Deletion of Religious degree scams

Comment: Reads like an essay, sourcing is problematic. The article would require a major rewrite to remove unencyclopedic  content which is inherently problematic with regard to . The same goes for incorporating the good parts into another article. Hmm, I suppose one could make a case for soft deletion but as it stands now, I'm afraid it's either major rewrite or delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: to degree mill, purging current content. Original research as per : "introduces an analysis or synthesis of established facts, ideas, opinions, or arguments in a way that builds a particular case favored by the editor, without attributing that analysis or synthesis to a reputable source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)