Deletion of Racism in South Korea

Comment: Clearly a relevant, encyclopedic topic. Quite a bit one-sided now, but remaining problems have to be solved by reasonable editing, introduction of additional  and discussion of controversial aspects on the talk page. However, the introductory sentence is clearly too loud, given it is not sufficiently backed by .Please see also my current move request at Talk:Ethnic issues in China#Requested move 4 June 2016
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: The topic is encyclopedic, there are academic refs ({{cite book|author1=Ryuko Kubota|author2=Angel M.Y. Lin|title=Race, Culture, and Identities in Second Language Education: Exploring Critically Engaged Practice|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=-HKQAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA56|date=2 June 2009|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-135-84569-8|pages=56–}}). The article may have some problems, but by no means it is anywhere near able. The nominator would be advised instead to add copyediting tags such as {{tl|dubious}} or {{tl|cite}} and discusses particular problematic passages at talk
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Parts of the article can be improved, but overall the article is not that bad. The topic is notable in any case. The problem seems to me that most of the references are newspaper reports (where journals would be preferred). That can be improved though.  is not required here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)