Deletion of Lina Caceres

Comment: for lack of |reliable sources and because |it is just too much of a mess to fix
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:TNT)

Comment: it really does read like a CV, and the problem is that most of the details in the text are unverifiable using reliable sources. Produ is basically a networking website for professionals in the communications industry: I'm not sure it counts as an RS, but even so, the first reference is just Ms. Caceres using it to publicise upcoming work by artists under her management. ''Alo'' is a ''Hello!''-style glossy celebrities magazine, and the reference is a primary source interview, so that would fail independent coverage. The Hispanicize, Socialmediaweek and Worldforumdisrupt are identical press release biographies supplied by Ms. Caceres, and the last reference is an event listing for a university talk. I suppose you could argue that she passes criterion 1 of , but with almost nothing in the way of independent reliable sources to support this assertion, this article would have to be cut down to a couple of lines of text. Even the infobox would have to be almost entirely deleted. because nowhere in the sources is there any mention of Ms. Caceres' full name, birth date, birth place or dual nationality, so this article has clearly been created by the subject or someone who works closely with her
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)