Deletion of Coseer

Comment: They may very well be reputable third party sources, but the articles themselves are not intellectually independent as they rely almost entirely on company-produced material or quotations from company sources. The references therefore fail the criteria for establishing notability and fail  and/or . Find a reference that doesn't rely on quotations from company officers or material provided/published by the company
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: I requested that you find references that do not rely on quotations from company officers or material provided/published by the company in order to safely meet the criteria for establishing notability - specifically  and/or . References must be intellectually independent in order to meet the criteria for establishing independence. Articles that extensively quote an interview with founders or company officers are not intellectually independent and are regarded as PRIMARY sources since all the facts and information is being relayed by the company or its officers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: This is textbook  masquerading as an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: Fails GNG, references fails  and/or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)