Deletion of Siae Microelettronica

Comment: the new article version respects and meets the  and . A lot of references are been introduced in order to justify internationality and notability (I hope that the community will be improve the page with other available references). I vote to remove all issues present on the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:CORP)

Comment: I'm rather new to wiki, but in my opinion we should factor in both news and technical notability in the specific field. The company actually is involved in several projects in the telecom world. A simple search in IEEE returns about 10 recent peer-reviewed publications http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?queryText=siae%20microelettronica&newsearch=true which I think should be considered "independent sources" as per  and which affect the international notability of a company. Besides, the company has earned wider attention for both its history (recent acquisitions-related news pointed out by {{u|Waggie}}) and also for researching, among others, a strongly debated topic, namely the exploitment of orbital angular momentum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_angular_momentum_multiplexing through its subsidiary, Twistoff http://www.corrierecomunicazioni.it/eventi/27757_l-innovazione-in-italia-prospettive-criticita-e-nuovi-modelli-di-business.htm, http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/trends/OAM/Pages/default.aspx and several more technical publications ensued in various other peer-reviewed journals and conferences http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015RS005662/full, https://www.osapublishing.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-22-14-17135, http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1837790 (I guess a full list of these can be gathered, if needed). Hope this helps the discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)