Deletion of Mercedes Graf

Comment: I understand the deletion rationales, but I think a case can be made for keeping this article.  otability (academics) says that ''"some academics may not meet any of these criteria, but may still be notable for their academic work...it is natural that successful ones should be considered notable."''  Graf's historical work is recognized by the Organization of American Historians as the "first comprehensive overview" of a certain historical topic http://archive.today/GxVsu.  Moreover, her historical publications have been featured in fairly prestigious periodicals http://archive.today/GxVsu.  She is also listed as an author on a number of psychological publications, a number of which have been modestly cited (see Scholar).  If Gary Roy Geffken|this article has not been deleted, I see no reason why we ought to remove Graf's; indeed, she appears to have had a more substantial impact
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: no indication of "a significant or well-known work" or "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)