Deletion of Captivity of Kodavas at Seringapatam

Comment: The article has multiple sources and loads of citations.  It may rely too heavily on certain sources.  However it is certainly NOT .  The question of how reliable the underlying sources are may well be a controversial question, but it is one to be argued out between academics.  Doing so within WP would itself be a form of .  I am not convinced that the title of the article is an ideal one, but that is no reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:OR)