Deletion of Real Social Dynamics (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails , which is not a proposed guideline but an actual guideline. Neither of the sources that work even mention "Real Social Dynamics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Does not satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: In definate need of cleanup. Notability appears shaky from reading the article itself, but i'll trust the judgement of those above, as well as the opinion that  is worthless since both sides use it as a reason and neither side can seem to explain how it applies here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: on account that the article seems rather spammy.  If it can be rewritten and the sources (above) included (are they |reliable and establish |notability?), I'll likely change my mind
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: satisfies , sourced, etc. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: and '''Merge''' into Tyler Durden (pick-up artist) (and possibly articles on other principals). The |reliable sources presented thus far establish Tyler Durden, and possibly one or both of the other principals, are notable as individuals, but they do not establish that their company, the Real Social Dynamics company, is notable as a company. The sources refer to the individuals, and they make clear that it is the individuals, not the company, who possess whatever notability/notoriety exists here. Tyler Durden currently redirects to Fight Club; Tyler Durden the PUA doesn't currently have his own article. Starting with that (and adding a disambig page) would appear to be solider ground for a Wikipedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)