Deletion of The Fear (2015 film)

Comment: per easily meeting  and '''speedy close''' per '''1)''' poor  which missed http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/la-peur-film-review-816867 significant coverage and '''2)''' further and apparent misunderstanding of  and . In his unintended error, the nom apparently expects a brand new film to be judged by attributes untended only to encourage diligence research for older films.  A brand new film is NOT expected to have attributes which ''might'' be expected of something that has been out for years or decade. Being brand new, it need not be "widely distributed" or "historically notable", and only now making it through festivals it need not have (yet) "received awards" and, being brand new it is foolish to expect it would be part of any educational syllabus.  My thanks to {{u|Cavarrone}} for sharing the non-English sources perfectly fine for a non-English film
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:BEFORE||WP:NF||WP:NONENG)

Comment: The nom believes that redlinks equal non-notable, which is incorrect. The film has been selected to be screened at the Toronto Film Festival, one of the biggest festivals on the planet. I suggested the nom should read , which they chose to ignore. In seconds I found http://www.allocine.fr/film/fichefilm_gen_cfilm=230080.html this, http://www.allocine.fr/article/fichearticle_gen_carticle=18644401.html this, http://www.premiere.fr/film/La-Peur-4087913 this and http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/la-peur-film-review-816867 this lengthy review
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The brand new article which was perhaps |impatiently sent to AFD was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fear_%282015_film%29&type=revision&diff=677446813&oldid=677346507 stubby, yes... but under  and diting policy it was https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Fear_%282015_film%29&type=revision&diff=677887838&oldid=677446813 easy to bring up to Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment#Quality scale|C-Class. I remind {{u|Undead warrior|the nominator}} that Wikipedia |is a work in progress... and while AFD is |not intended to force cleanup,  |we do not toss what is improvable. Anyone who wishes to, will find no one arguing with an early close under 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IMPATIENT||WP:BEFORE||WP:E||WP:WIP||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:DEADLINE||WP:OUTCOMES)