Deletion of List of TV Guide covers

Comment: Many lists are encyclopedic and apt. A list of which person was on each cover of a magazine, for each weekly issue in its history, is probably not. The criteria of "not an indiscriminate collection" () comes into play. A magazine that has to position a different celebrity each 7 days is almost surely driven more by the need to have a cover picture than to select "discriminatingly" as to notability. More to the point, whilst the ''people'' may be notable or the ''magazine'', no good argument has been made that the ''list of cover celebs'' is notable. "List of people on covers of X publication" is not inherently notable for all or even most publications (a point made above); this one doesn't seem especially notable either. The main "keep" views are centered around four cases of , "highly relevant" (,  refer), and ""if we delete this what happens to other pages" and "individuals are notable so a list that contains them is notable". None of these are actually AFD reasons that carry weight under community norms for AFD. The only other reason that is given above, which might carry weight, is a claim that this specific magazine was so significant (so to speak) that its cover choice record was notable in and of itself. That's possible but would need some supporting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS||WP:USEFUL||WP:INTERESTING)

Comment: Several above have argued that TV Guide covers are culturally significant and notable, so allow me to present several |reliable sources to prove it: TV Guide covers are the subject of news articles (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-89947806.html "Not enough stars for ''TV Guide'' covers", http://www.salon.com/media/poni/1998/08/05poni.html "The autocrat of the coffee table: ''TV Guide'', America's favorite coaster, becomes history in spite of itself" , http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=WO&p_theme=wo&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EADE7412CF34A18&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM  "Collector is hooked on ''TV Guide''s", and http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&um=1&tab=wn&q=%22TV+Guide+cover%7Ccovers%22+%7C+%22cover%7Ccovers+of+TV+Guide%22 over a thousand news articles containing the phrases "TV Guide cover(s)" or "Cover(s) of TV Guide"), academic papers (http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED270749&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED270749  "Ignoring Change: An Evaluation of ''TV Guide'' Covers, 1970-1979"), books (''http://www.amazon.com/Covers-TV-Guide-Bangzoom/dp/097790993X The Covers of ''TV Guide'''', ''http://www.amazon.com/TV-Guide-Official-Collectors-Celebrating/dp/0977292711 ''TV Guide'' The Official Collectors Guide: Celebrating An Icon'', ''http://www.amazon.com/Changing-Channels-AMERICA-TV-GUIDE/dp/025201779X Changing Channels: America in ''TV Guide''''), and museum exhibits (http://www.museum.tv/newssection.php?page=136 "''TV Guide'' and The Museum of Broadcast Communications Join Forces", http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9405E1DD1E3FF931A35754C0A96E958260 "Museum as Reprieve From the Recycling Bin; From Coffee-Table Clutter to Coveted Collectible
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)