Deletion of Covent Garden Hotel

Comment: sources demonstrate compliance with .  In general, top-end hotels are notable because they are extensively written about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: seems as if there is enough notable, reliable 3rd-party coverage; a simple Google search indicates that there are sufficient sources (to me).  Perhaps some |point of view issues, but this is not grounds for deletion, as the subject ''is'' notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Covered in multiple reliable sources, as demonstrated in the article's own references.  is meant to exclude trivial or subjective sightseeing information, not to block articles on notable establishments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)

Comment: per the sources above demonstrating passing .  It took me 10 seconds to find the sources Eastmain found.  The quickest I've been able to start an AfD is 1 minute.  I've said before,  should be a requirement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Covered in |reliable source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)