Deletion of Eden English School Btl

Comment: at least until  can be met and this can be shown to not be a hoax. Even SCHOOLOUTCOMES requires we meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: I've seen many people (myself included) argue along the lines of  in this particular case, pointing to a lack of reliable sources with which to write an article, regardless of whether the subject is argued to be notable. However, we have an awful lot of people arguing to keep -- numerically sufficient to make it difficult to envision someone willing to close as delete, regardless of the content of the arguments. So my question is what comes next. The content of the article has been officially challenged as  provides for, but if the article is closed as no consensus (or keep!), I imagine removing the content would be highly controversial. So what happens next? &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN||WP:V)

Comment: We keep high schools for the very good reason that experience shows that, with enough research, sources can invariably be found that meet . Google is a very poor tool for finding sources on non-Anglophone schools. We must avoid systemic bias and allow time for local sources to be researched since no evidence has been adduced that this school cannot meet notability requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: as failing . Several editors above have pointed to  as a reason to keep this article, but note that the consensus documented there is to keep articles on secondary schools that are verified by independent sources. To uphold that consensus requires deleting this unsourced article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY||WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)

Comment: as failing |ORG and GNG. SCHOOLOUTCOMES is ''not'' a guideline, and it absolutely does not reflect consensus to keep unsourced, COIN articles about non-notable private institutions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Completely unreferenced puff-piece.  Without future prejudice, it's current incarnation reeks of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: unless reliable sources about it can be found. If we can't find reliable sources, it is impossible for us to write a |verifiable article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' if there's a relevant e.g. district article) - There are some who argue that schools receive a free pass for , but if there are no , there is nothing on which to base an article per . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: fails notability, insufficiently covered by reliable sources. SCHOOLOUTCOMES is not a policy or guideline, while  is, consequently opinions based on SCHOOLOUTCOMES  should be disregarded
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)