Deletion of PanelWhiz

Comment: This software tool (which I've used) will not meet WP's criteria of demonstrated notability and independent coverage. It probably never will.  In this case, however, I'd argue for . For new economics researchers this software will save them months of work coming to grips with the complexity of the world's largest panel surveys, where many thousands of variables are stored in hundred of files. Choosing the right variables in the right files and making CPI adjustments and ensuring that variations in question administration have been fixed and setting up the panel data in a long longitudinal file and applying the appropriate population weight is not straightforward. So this is a niche piece of software which would only interest economists and social scientists working on one or more of the world's largest panel surveys (German, British, USA, Canadian and Australian). Keeping this page does not decrement Wikipedia's quality. Cheers Clappingsimon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: This isn't a case for .  If the darned software is so useful, then surely it will get independent media coverage and we can start an article when that happens
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)