Deletion of Talend (2nd nomination)

Comment: as unambiguous . Additionally, it's difficult to take the argument about "information that's not coming from Talend website" at face value, given that an admitted company employee has been reverting efforts to remove content like "In today’s increasingly data-driven world, most companies use data integration and management software like Talend to enable their digital transformation and manage their entire data ecosystem
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: I agree with BillHPike. There are ''lots'' of Google News hits and even some Google Books hits for Talend, but I couldn't find a single reliable third-party source that discusses the company in some detail. The best are some reports that discuss specific acquisitions, but that's just routine coverage that  explicitly does not consider helpful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Looking for sources for this company was fascinating, there are so many PR-articles and stock reporting that it is difficult to find something useful. I initially thought this would be an easy ''Keep'', but looking closer they all seem to be rehashed PR-statements or rehashed economic reports from the company. Even the WSJ article is mostly just restating information clearly coming directly from the company. The only article I can find that looks like independent journalism is the article in Le Mondehttps://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2013/12/12/l-incroyable-ascension-de-talend_4332483_651865.html. Promotional tone is not a valid reason for deletion, but since the coverage in independent reliable sources seems to be so minimal (despite massive coverage in other types of sources) I think the article does not currently meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)