Deletion of Haldia Development Authority

Comment: An interesting test case. But bottom line: regional government office - has no inherent notability, fails , and no independent references make it fail . We may have many similar articles, yes. And we should purge all of them. OTYELLOWPAGES
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:N||WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES)

Comment: Hi DGG, I am not surprised by the nomination. But please note that this is one of :Category:State urban development authorities of India With the State Chief Secretary as its chairman (which implies it is highly empowered and has a notable mandate). Source{{cite web|url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=iI1-FtRwvzsC&q=%22Haldia+Development+Authority%22&dq=%22Haldia+Development+Authority%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi81qfQjI7dAhUHs48KHRuSC7MQ6AEIUjAI|title=Report - Public Accounts Committee|first=India Parliament Public Accounts|last=Committee|date=3 September 1978|publisher=Lok Sabha Secretariat.|via=Google Books}} The local language is Bengali so the  that we are looking for will mostly be found in Bengali. I would not claim that this Government company will pass  with flying colours but it has enough to merit an article here. regards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NORG)

Comment: I'm not seeing sufficient  to meet .  Two of the three references in the existing article are to the HDA's own website.  Normally, I'd say a merge or redirect to Haldia would make sense per , but lacking any good references, and with concern about , I'd just delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:ATD||WP:UNDUE)