Deletion of Siddharth Singh (civil servant)

Comment: there is enough  in  to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: There seem to be enough / to convince me the subject passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:GNG)

Comment: for want of  and . Other than the ''India Today'', there are no reliable sources; we require several for "significant coverage," which is lacking. While he's an honorable civil servant, he fails for automatic inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: Routine coverage with no nothing significant. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Pure vanity article, with no encyclopaedic value. I see absolutely nothing to suggest  notability. The sources do at first look plentiful, but they are just passing mentions, some are identical, and one returns a 'page not found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The article does not meet , , . Non-elected civil servants do not meet  and sources wouldn't support even if it was a valid criteria.  revealed no  containing material that meets  addressing the subject directly and in depth. BLP articles should strictly follow ,  and  sourcing requirements. &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NPOL||WP:BEFORE||WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N)