Deletion of Kevin Granata

Comment: The previous comment pointing to  seems relevant enough to warrant keeping the Granata article on Wikipedia.  Furthermore, as the editor of multiple academic journals, one day this article will link into other articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: It would not be up for AfD if it was not just created. 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: His credentials appear to satisfy . He has a respectable list of articles published in refereeed journals, and a good history of funded research. However, his department head praising him in the aftermath must be taken as a eulogy rather than an objective independent evaluation, and he had only achieved Associate Professor status. When he was  murdered in mid-career he had a very bright future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: meets  categories 1 and 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Easily passes  as per NawlinWiki
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: seems to pass , and his tragic death makes him even more notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Whether this article was created as a result of the VTech shooting is irrelevant to AfD.  What ''is'' relevant is whether Granata fulfills the requirements of ,  and .  He does.  Would an article containing such sourced assertions have been remotely in danger of failing AfD a week ago
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: It is starting to look a lot like , and that's coming from someone who actually voted delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Passes  and is notable. I stand by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)