Deletion of Doug Bayne

Comment: unsourced BLP. the keep !votes have used a  argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:MUSTBESOURCES)

Comment: Certainly the article needs a rewrite with proper referencing.  I easily and quickly saw a reasonable but light number of independent sources of a range of reliability from official government sites to almost the other end of the spectrum.  There are reviews and mentions of him and his work not just in English but other languages so the subject is known internationally too.  I think there is sufficient  to demonstrate notability.  The remaining question is whether the article stays and gets worked on or whether it gets ed and redone from scratch
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:TNT)