Deletion of W. H. Pugmire (2nd nomination)

Comment: per meeting  and . Sources include the numerous sources listed in the article, along with publications including ''Locus (magazine)|Locus'' https://locusmag.com/2019/03/w-h-pugmire-1951-2019/, ''Publishers Weekly'' https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-61498-230-2 https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-61498-133-6 https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-61498-023-0, http://www.themonarchreview.org/love-for-the-craft-the-weird-tales-of-w-h-pugmire/ ''The Monarch Review'', ''Fantasy Magazine'' http://www.fantasy-magazine.com/reviews/weird-inhabitants-pugmire/, ''Asimov's Science Fiction'' https://web.archive.org/web/20060906230013/http://asimovs.com/_issue_0409/onbooks.shtml, and https://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/black-wings-cthulhu ''New York Journal of Books''. Various other mentions and references can be found with a Google search or two, here are a few random mentions: https://www.wired.com/2012/09/the-cthulhu-sized-cthulhu-books-review/ https://stokers2012.lisamorton.com/spress.html https://www.thestranger.com/seattle/visual-arts-listings/Content?oid=12418 https://locusmag.com/2019/01/john-langan-reviews-clark-ashton-smith-the-emperor-of-dreams/ https://www.portlandmercury.com/things-to-do/2018/10/04/23397954/the-29-best-things-to-do-in-portland-this-weekend-oct-5-7. Other sources listed in the article include ''The Lovecraft eZine'', ''The New York Review of Science Fiction'', ''Famous Monsters of Filmland'', and ''The Seattle Times''. I am quite confused on how the nominator came to the conclusion that "The only reliable source is not independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NAUTHOR)