Deletion of Cosmic Era vehicles

Comment: this is fancruft taken to a ludicrous extreme. Without any references or assertions of notability of their topics, there is no reason to consider these articles encyclopedic. Wikipedia is |not an indiscriminate collection of information, and these articles are nothing more than indiscriminate aggregations of fan minutiae. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: First,  | be civil. My 'ignorance', as you put it, has nothing to do with my opinion of these articles. Please be objective: how do schematics, specifications and the etymology of fictional spaceships from a moderately popular cartoon benefit anyone but the most dedicated group of fans? Second, articles based wholly on unverifiable claims ''is'' a valid reason for deletion consideration -- probably the most important one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: Per , articles about fictional topics must include -- no, ''focus on'' -- their relevance to the real-world. This makes no argument for its cultural value, even ''within the Gundam universe
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)

Comment: None of the articles have sources. Possible . All Fail . In my opinion, fails  ''not an indiscriminate collection of information''. Pure fancruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:NOT)

Comment: more general articles, '''merge''' more specific ones per . &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BB)