Deletion of Neeraj Mehta

Comment: Yes, some of the sources are interviews, but they're in major publications. That shows me that he's achieved the level of notability, through coverage in reliable sources, that  calls for. Does the article need cleanup? Probably. Should the article be kept and improved? Yes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the subject is notable according to , the article should be improved rather than simply deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:IDONTLIKEIT|I don't like this article. It's very promotional, not very balanced, and its references are in terrible shape. I'm not even sure if there's really enough for a standalone article, but that being said those are not necessarily valid deletion rationales and all seemingly |surmountable problems. This article may not expand beyond a start or stub but it meets what I would describe as the absolute bare minimum requirements for inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: I agree this appears to be a promotional piece by an SPA.  However, there appears to be enough sourcing to meet , albeit barely.  I don't feel strongly about this article, so I reserve the right to change my mind (and vote) based on any arguments presented
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)