Deletion of Holy Hell (film)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment:  is not a stable policy; users have been modifying it to the point where it is in direct contradiction to Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia - "to compile the sum of all human knowledge into a Web-based, free content encyclopedia." That goal trumps any current version of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: Does not meet  standards. The first three links for the cast do not link to the actors in the film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: and keep deleted until there's something we can say about it beyond 'it exists'. Per , articles about films yet to be released should generally be avoided (except where the production itself has achieved notability) as there's very little to say about them, and this article seems to be a perfect example of that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: Noted actors and pundits (e.g. Christopher Hitchens are in the movie. Meets ALL  standards.  (Sorry, didn't sign my post
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF)

Comment: Fails , only lists IMDb (which itself fails |reliable sources. The fact that Forbes talks about Christopher Hitchens is neither here nor there. Per , if the film has yet to be released then the production itself must be notable (no production actually on this film listed, only 2 IMDb sources that apparently do nothing more than give us a plot summary (since those are submitted by users, cannot really be sure it is accurate), and a supposed cast listing. Even if it didn't fail , it still fails  and  (sorry, IMDb suggesting it will be released in 2009 at some point does not mean that it will
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:RS||WP:NFF||WP:NFF||WP:NOTE||WP:CRYSTAL)