Deletion of List of deaths in The Sopranos series

Comment: This is exactly the type of article we should be encouraging users to create. It's well sourced (to the primary source -- the episode -- which is a perfectly allowed source), it's presented neatly (tabulated) and deaths are a notable part of The Sopranos -- a highly notable television, thus it stands that this type of information would be of interest to our readers. A merge would be inappropriate (per ), and the list meets the criteria set in #Purpose of lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SS||WP:LIST)

Comment: being #IINFO|indiscriminate information and not asserting out-of-universe |notability. Like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure Deaths|similar lists, this really isn't encyclopedic and indvidual deaths are better noted on individual characters' articles or entry in articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:FICT)

Comment: I agree with the nom about this as an application of #INDISCRIMINATE. I understand that this was an important and popular show and that a lot of people died in said show, but that doesn't mean that this list is Encyclopedia-worthy. As mentioned above, the potential exists for merging this information with all of the articles about every character who says more than five words in the series. I don't think that adding a list of deaths in any other mob movie, or important movie where people die would be any more relavent, and that's what I'm using to judge this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The article was nominated for deletion per #INDISCRIMINATE, however, that reason is '''invalid''' because it lists EVERY death in the series.  If some deaths were included, and some left out, that would make the list ''indiscriminate'', however, since ALL deaths are accounted for, then this list is ''discriminate'', and therefore, the nomination is invalid.  If you also take into account a point brought up post-nomination, that |wikipedia is not a directory, this too, is invalid, as this list is, in no way, trying to act as a directory.  A directory, for lack of a better word, is like a telephone book.  You look up something you need, and it tells you where to get the information.  (ie:  go to '''THIS''' location to find what you are looking for).  This list has what you are looking for inside the same article, it is not telling you to go anywhere else to find the information.  Of course, there are links to the episode where they died, but the list does not say "here is the episode, to find out who died, click here to find out".  Because of this reasoning, that, too, is an invalid reason to delete.  '''EVERY''' single list on Wikipedia, is going to have a blue link to somewhere else.  That does not mean it is acting like a directory.  True, there are people using , but there are also people using  as well. The fact of the matter is simply, that this list does not fail , and no other ''policy'' that I can find.  To delete this list would be absurd
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOT)

Comment: per sumnjim and CyberGhostface. #INDISCRIMINATE is repeatedly cited by the Filmaker but I don't believe any of the examples apply to this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'd like any administrator who comes by attempting to understand the discussion that is taking place, to keep in mind that these Afds are not a majority vote (although the '''Delete''' votes are not far behind), you may notice that the majority Keep votes are simply users stating that they either just plain like the article (), or simply state that "The Sopranos TV series is notable and the deaths in the series are important to the plot). Both of these statements, and any other Keep votes for that matter, have been refuted by myself and Bignole numerous times. Few of them have bothered to try to refute those statements (or even reply at all for that matter). At this point, I'd like to ask the administrator that is reading this Afd to carefully look at each comment and disregard any of the comments that are either unfounded or have been refuted. Most, if not all, of the above, have been
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)