Deletion of Gyn Talk (Visual Fiction)

Comment: Seems to be of minor importance. Article seems a |coatrack for gender and medicine issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: There aren't enough independent, third-party |reliable sources available to write a proper article.  We need published reviews by legitimate art critics to meet Wikipedia's basic  requirements for an article on this subject.  Joseph Levi, I see that you're a new editor.  You may not know that what we mean by ''notable'' is "How much information has already been published about this?", and '''not''' "How important is it to the world?"  Something that is incredibly important, but for which we can find no, or very few, independent, third-party reliable sources at this time is always deemed non-notable for the purpose of meeting Wikipedia's inclusion policies.  If proper reviews/art criticism becomes available later, then we can certainly re-create the article at that time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: per nom. This is |original research that fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)