Deletion of 1997–98 Kent Football League

Comment: I find it somewhat odd that people are forgetting how important  is to an article. At current, this article completely fails GNG. There is one link, that's it. I strongly suggest this be moved to '''draft''' space for the issues to be addressed. I am not against if the article was properly source. But I find the keep votes strangely floored in my opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Season articles at this level have existed for ten years or so, as clubs at this level are already considered notable. One or two editors have recently created articles for seasons going back further. Bearing in mind the season's fixtures and events are covered by all the clubs involved, and the relevant local press, I think they would easily satisfy  if they were properly developed, if they don't already. The issue is that a lot of these, especially the recent creations, don't include many sources. I did mention that to the editor involved, but he hasn't really taken it on board. The rationale for the creation of season (and club) articles was always that the league in question should operate within the top ten levels of English football, and satisfy . Today, this league does operate within those parameters. Whether it did in 1997–98, as the pyramid system was different then, I don't know. Whether that matters here, I am not sure. The article could and should be developed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: While there may be prior consensus that these divisions are notable, |consensus can change. I feel like there is such limited and sporadic coverage of these leagues that the content is limited to results, league tables and changes from the previous season, which is surely the definition of violating . The ones I've looked at have nothing that would indicate that they are notable as anything other than "something that happened". A sports league existing and its results being recorded is hardly out of the ordinary, and beyond bare results, very few stats are recorded by anyone other than the clubs themselves. I'm sorry, but I don't see anything particularly notable about a league table and a results grid, especially this low down the football pyramid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUSCANCHANGE||WP:NOTSTATS)