Deletion of Sparks Middle School Shooting

Comment:  I believe that Nom misinterprets , which does not require that "have significant impact over a wide region" but, rather, merely states that notable events "usually" have such impact. (although, cumulatively, school shootings have had such impact, and this one may have had it regionally or in some other, as yet unknown way.)  What it does require is that the event  "must receive significant or in-depth coverage"  This incident clearly did.  Notability, moreover is   :"Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage".  But beyond the black letter law test, which this article passes, there is this quesiton: What use is Wikipedia except in exactly situations like this, a terrible murder/event that occurred some time ago but which, if someone wants to know about it, is summarized in a reliably-sourced article on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: per .  I had seconded the proposed deletion based on the apparent paucity of sources showing a lasting impact, and I thought it was (sadly) run of the mill. I stand corrected
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)