Deletion of Temple Emanuel (St. Louis, Missouri)

Comment: because, rather than writing a nomination statement specific to this case, which would include an explanation of what is wrong with http://www.stljewishlight.com/news/local/article_86fdce7f-05b5-5395-8732-d8bf13efef4a.html this source, for instance, {{user|Basket of Puppies}} has written a generic, copy-pasteable  argument which doesn't directly address the article in question at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN)

Comment: I've followed this debate in recent days and have seen how this article has grown.  I am saddened by the heated words that have been exchanged here and respect the arguments and the contributions to this encyclopedia of those who advocate deleting this article.  However, I have concluded that the article as it now stands deserves to stay, because of the references provided.  One lesson that I draw from this and similar debates is that rapid-fire mass deletion nominations too often cause an excessive amount of controversy.  A slower and more judicious approach is a wiser approach, supplemented by the recommendations of .  That's my opinion, for what it's worth.  Peace to all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Notability is handily established, satisfying requirements of  and  by multiple |Reliable sources of non-trivial nature. A little silly all this comparison to entities that are far afield from the topic of this discussion. We are discussing a synagogue, which is a Jewish house of worship. It would be OK if some of the comparisons shed light on this topic, but I don't see the farfetched comparisons as  illuminating
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: Seems to have received |significant coverage in |reliable secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:significant coverage)

Comment: Notability indicated by (among other things) large number of  that discuss it. Kudos to Yoninah and Epeefleche for improving the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)