Deletion of Li-Meng Yan

Comment: Li-Meng Yan's case has received a lot of media coverage, and according to  that should be sufficient reason for inclusion. Admittedly, much of the coverage was in Murdoch media, but many of them are . Her story seems to be that she heard from a professional colleague that the novel pneumonia was transmitted from human to human on 31 December 2019, WHO said there was no evidence of human to human transmission on 9 January, but Yan reported her knowledge of human to human transmission to her superiors on 16 January, but they told her not to talk about it. The Chinese government started the lockdown on 23 January, so human to human transmission must have been common knowledge at that time. I'm not sure what the verifiable facts are and what the truth is, but I'd like to see the claims on both sides laid out on Wikipedia for the benefit of people who are trying to figure it out. It would be a much better story if and when more reliable sources than the Murdoch media and anti-PRC media, preferably written by reporters who understand the discovery of the covid-19 virus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:WEIGHT||WP:RS)

Comment: fulfilled  due to many news reports
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject meets . This case is evolving and should be represented on Wikipedia.  This gives the public a place to review the information in a public forum that has moderated controls. Also, found this reference to https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341378309_Pathogenesis_and_transmission_of_SARS-CoV-2_in_golden_hamsters Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters publication where Dr. Leo Poon & Li-Meng Yan are listed as authors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: For now at least. I didn't know where else to turn to find out more about her when I saw the headlines, and I expect many others will do the same. Whether or not she has been groomed by the Trump administration (or its associates) and the veracity of her claim has no bearing on the public interest in her at this point;  has already been met. But given the extent to which this has been politicised and the amount of tinfoilhattery around her story, and SARS-CoV-2 in general, the article will surely need to be monitored for dodgy edits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: due to multiple sources reporting on her, so passes . I really don't know if would also pass  though, but that's not required in this case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPROF)