Deletion of 2007 Swiss incursion into Liechtenstein

Comment: I feel I must comment on the recent votes for deletion of this article.  NMChico24, does every Mexican migrant who crosses the border wind up on every major news station and newspaper in the United States?  Hut 8.5, why doesn't it merit an article?  It's a widely published incident, please give a reason.  Agnetha1234, "substance" is irrelevant.  This is why we have stubs, an article should not be deleted for being short, so long as what's contained within is proven to be notable and is sourced.  YechielMan, how does this "ten-year test" pertain to Wikipedia guidelines?  I never read it in a policy before.  Further, an incident passing notability guidelines at one point in time passes notability guidelines always (ignoring changes in the guidelines themselves).  Just because people stop talking about something doesn't mean it should be removed from Wikipedia.  And yes, this incident was only widely publicied for its amusement value, but  doesn't care ''why'' something is notable, only that it is.  No one here has yet to contest that this incident received substantial coverage in English language media, so barring that, someone please explain to me ''per Wikipedia policy/guidelines'' why this should be deleted.  I appologize if that seemed a bit rash, I'm just befuddled here. User:Someguy1221|Someguy1221
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I can't think of any reason this article should be kept other than that |it's funny. There was an accidental incursion of Spain by some Royal Marines near Gibraltar a few years ago that was actually a minor diplomatic incident. I'd consider that the bare minimum for a real article. (We have none on that one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: in full and '''Redirect''' to whatever seems appropriate, I'm not going to suggest a target.  I believe this meets the notability requirements considering its coverage in the media (it doesn't matter if Switzerland and Liechtenstein news agencies didn't give a damn,  doesn't specify where the sources have to come from so long as they're independent, reliable, non-trivial...).  However, short of Switzerland invading a few more times, there is no hope of this article gaining any new, significant information.  I would support '''keep''' as well though, stubs are certainly allowed to stay as stubs
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)