Deletion of List of members of council of Vilnius University

Comment: Actually, while it is true that Wikipedia is not a directory,  says "''Directories, directory entries, electronic program guides, or resources for conducting business''", "''For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc.''", and I do not see how any of that applies here. If it does, a case should be made more explicitly. As for notability, well, the article does cite a couple of news articles in national news web sites Delfi.lt, 15 min, Lithuanian National Radio and Television, they give the full list of the members of (then) newly chosen council. Thus those sources are reliable, secondary (not protocols of relevant meetings, that would be primary sources), independent of the object (neither of those web sites belong to the university), and they cover the subject (the list of members) in detail (that is, they list all those members). Thus the requirements in otability seem to be met. As for "''Even prominent universities don't have pages listing their trustees or councils.''", that might look counterintuitive, but maybe in this specific case those boards simply have no suitable sources, for some reason? Maybe the boards themselves are seen to have a less important role? Maybe the people in them are not seen as quite as prominent (in this case Ingrida Šimonytė was a former Finance minister, afterwards was second in presidential elections)? In conclusion, currently I do not see a valid reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY||WP:N)