Deletion of The Portland Black Panthers: Empowering Albina and Remaking a City

Comment: I think the nominator has misunderstood , reading it as imposing further requirements on academic books when in fact it's intended as a loosening of the  requirements in order to, as it says, mitigate against situations where the latter "would be too restrictive and would exclude articles on books that are worthy of notice". In this case the less restrictive guideline is irrelevant because (as the nominator seems to acknowledge)  is met, but is Phil Bridger points out, so is . I agree with the nominator that it's probably not desirable that "every academic book that gets a book review in an academic journal be considered notable", but in this case there's not just one book review but at least six – https://academic.oup.com/whq/article-abstract/48/1/67/2669721, https://phr.ucpress.edu/content/86/2/358, https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/122/4/1262/4320327, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01419870.2017.1380214, https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-abstract/104/2/551/4095541, https://scq.ucpress.edu/content/99/2/242.abstract – clearly constituting |significant coverage in independent reliable sources. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:TEXTBOOKS||WP:BKCRIT||WP:BKCRIT||WP:TEXTBOOKS||WP:GNG)