Deletion of Vijay Batra

Comment: per nom. Many of the sources are not independent (based on press releases), some do not qualify as |reliable sources, the few that can be considered reliable (Hindusian times and the Tribune India) do not provide in depth coverage. The first cites the subject as an example for a profession along with other professionals, and the tribune is a routine mention of an event. It is not enough to satisfy the |notability guidelines. Also the article written by a  seems promotional in its tone and contents
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:SPA)

Comment: per nom. Virtually all of the references are completely unacceptable |primary sources which cannot support or confer |notability — of the 11 sources here, he's named as the bylined ''author'' of ''eight'' of them. But a person doesn't get a Wikipedia article by being the ''author'' of media coverage of other ''things''; he gets a Wikipedia article by being the ''subject'' of media coverage authored by other ''people''. And even the references where he ''is'' a subject are blurbs or namechecks, not ''substantive'' coverage. And this tilts far enough away from encyclopedic writing tone, and close enough to public relations, that I strongly suspect |conflict of interest editing even if I can't prove that outright
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:N||WP:COI)

Comment: Came here from /N. Despite a large quantity of sources, all of them appear to be primary. I could not find additional independent sources that provided significant coverage (though there does appear to be an Indian army captain of the same name with a lot of attention, but they are clearly not the same person). Although I can say with some certainty that a COI was involved here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)