Deletion of JobServe (2nd nomination)

Comment: Yes there are problems, but I again find myself at an article where the nominator should have read the previous AfD, looked for at least one stonewall obvious merge, and detected suitable sources exist.  I am now too long at  for the past couple of days ... but is this  or Frivolous or vexatious?  Yes as per the previous AfD the article is  so positively wade in and fix it.  Luckily  hopefully stops inadequate article coming through.  I guess as I'm in the UK I know of the Company better and I'd better declare I've used their website
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD||WP:COMPETENCY||WP:UGLY||WP:NPP)

Comment: Again it is on the nominator to do a  - no compliance is vexatious
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)