Deletion of Newry Junior Chamber

Comment: Not notable, and so fundamentally promotional that  would be necessary even if it met  and  could be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NONPROFIT||WP:RS)

Comment: Recently, I've come across many not for profit organizations on the Afd desk. These organizations do credible work in their space, and have considerable mentions with respect to the conferences/events/competitions they hold and the awards they give. Unfortunately, while media reports on these events et al, they fail to report on the organization itself. This results in a strange situation, where while my personal opinion would be to keep some of these non-profits for informational purposes, they don't qualify on our notability guidelines, either for |organizations or for |non-profits. I would personally prefer a newer addition to the NONPROFIT guideline to enable some kind of leeway as is given to higher level schools or to state/country level political parties, where, even if only trivial mentions are there, precedent tends towards keeping the articles. Till such guidelines become operational, it's tough to !vote keep. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:NONPROFIT)

Comment: Per nom, doesn't seem to meet  (the 3 or 4 news mentions are limited in scope, not focused specifically on the subject, and of the "passing mention" variety). Nor does it seem to meet  (not "national or international in scale" - in fact by definition and per lead is a local group with a small number of members). In short, doesn't seem to meet either the general NN criteria (for coverage), or the org/non-profit criteria (for scope
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NONPROFIT)