Deletion of Irish property bubble

Comment: As it stands, this does contain a lot of original research. If it is not to do so, it needs to be cleaned up by including references, as currently the article is full of "citation needed" with little or no real references (compare to main article Real estate bubble which includes many). The tone is also too much in an essay/OR style ("that raises the question...") It could also be argued that the article is very crystal ballish, as a bubble is as much defined by the "pop" as the growth beforehand, so a bubble can only be confirmed in hindsight. The article may be salavageable, if good references are found to say "sources A+B thinks it's a bubble because of reason X,Y and Z", although caution must be applied, as introducing new analysis that are not in the sources would be original research. This article currently contains quite a lot of this type of OR, for example, one of the references is the daft report saying that the yield is ~3%. The yield figure is cited information, yes, but implying that it a bearish argument is OR, as no such implication to that effect was contained in the source. If OR like this can be removed, and good references found, ensuring that the information used is cited correctly and not given a new synthysis, then it may be kept, but until those problems are addressed the article fails , #Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball and #What_is_excluded.3F, all of which are valid grounds for deletion unless fixed. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:NOR)

Comment: the article belongs to a Real_estate_bubble#See_also| series of articles on the same subject. Even in its current ugly state the article seems clear that the subject is a theory, and #Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball couldn't be applied without applying to all of the others. Agree that extent of {{tl|fact}} tags is pathetic, but unfortunately Wikipedia has many articles littered with these, for example the article on Margaret Thatcher. I don't think that this warrants the scrapping of the entire article in either case
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)