Deletion of PromptCloud

Comment: per  as blatant advertisement (Services, History, Awards) and so that to not further waste volunteer editors' time trying to maintain the neutrality of this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: quite apart from the aggressive attitude of the COI editors toward the nominator, I've just done a reference check - this is a blatantly promotional article, with ''most'' sources being bad. Promotional blogs, sponsored content sites, press releases ... I'm actually surprised there are a few sources that pass . If this is kept, it needs to be cut down to strictly what's in RSes, and will be about a paragraph. However, given the aggressively promotional attitude of the COI editors, I'd advise it be salted as well if deleted, to forestall another round of this. That's the only reason I haven't just stuck a G11 tag on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Fails ; sources mostly fail , and as such fail to indicate inherent notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:RS)

Comment: going through and removing the tags on the dubious sources doesn't make them into good sources. Please review 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: or '''Draftify''' - A standard  search did not reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources to pass the |general notability threshold
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG)