Deletion of Mayor of Chesterfield

Comment: without prejudice against another editor recreating it. The question of whether the role would be notable enough to get its holders over  as the subjects of ''biographical'' articles or not is quite separate from the question of whether we should keep a |verifiable list of their names or not — there may be a case to be made that we shouldn't, but the ability of the mayors to satisfy NPOL as standalone biographies isn't relevant to it. The blocked user thing means we do have to withhold ''attribution'' from the blocked editor, but it doesn't preclude an editor in good standing recreating it so that ''they'' get the attribution instead
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:V)

Comment: This list was created by a blocked user who seemed to specialise in niche subjects of dubious notability. My reading of  suggests that this list is indiscriminate information as hardly any of the names apparently warrant an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: A well-defined list, that has the potential of becomming a |valuable navigational aid,  dosen't come into play here. Should be moved to List of mayors of Chesterfield
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:NOT)