Deletion of Kat Walsh

Comment: to Wikimedia Foundation or '''Delete'''.  However, if we delete this page, we'll probably need to clean up several other pages, too, as this is part of a series on Wikimedia chairpersons.  To suddenly have a hole in the sequence is a bit off-putting, and a few of them are equally non-notable.  As far as Kat Walsh goes, I noticed a few trivial mentions scattered throughout reliable sources, but there really doesn't seem to be anything like |significant coverage.  I'm sure she does good work, but I don't think holding a position with the WMF makes one inherently notable
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: seems pretty silly to try to delete this, even before all the references were added.  We don't need to artificially follow all the picayune rules when we know that WMF Chairs are notable to our readers ( if you need to follow a formal rule).  Well there are lots of sources now, might as well make it a speedy keep.  What was the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:POINT)

Comment: The Chair of the WMF is not an inherently notable position, so we must abide by  and .  The sources before the recent additions were already lacking, and the additions have not alleviated that concern
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:N)