Deletion of Carole Ford

Comment: This article was created in the period leading up to the 2016 Scottish Parliament election, regarding which the subject does not meet  as an unsuccessful candidate. Regarding other career activities, authorship of textbooks and working as a school head teacher are not in themselves grounds for notability. On the other hand, the reference which I added does describe her as "a leading figure in the profession" (teaching); it may be arguable that such a description plus the Union position, appointment as a lay person to a Law Society body, etc. accumulate to some basic level of notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per . Most of the coverage is either quotes by the subject or a brief mention in the context of an election. There are hardly any articles focusing on the subject themselves
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES)

Comment: per . As written, this is based far too strongly on |primary sources rather than |reliable ones, and even the reliable ones aren't cutting the mustard all that effectively. For instance, she's the ''bylined author'' of every last citation here to ''The Scotsman'', not their subject — but a person gets a Wikipedia article by being the ''subject'' of media coverage written by other ''people'', not by being the ''author'' of media coverage about other ''things''. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can source it ''properly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:RS)