Deletion of Elizabeth Englander

Comment: Citations not high enough for #C1 and the article makes no case for any other notability criterion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: She has one highly cited work, ''https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=RzBpB7MAAAAJ&citation_for_view=RzBpB7MAAAAJ:u5HHmVD_uO8C Understanding Violence'' (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327949pac1102_7?journalCode=hpcn20 review), and her research on bullying and 'sexting' has attracted some media coverage http://hereandnow.legacy.wbur.org/2013/11/18/purpose-of-bullyinghttps://beta.prx.org/stories/106087http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/18/living/teens-sexting-what-parents-can-do/index.htmlhttps://www.onlinemswprograms.com/in-focus/interview-with-dr-elizabeth-englander-on-cyberbullying-and-cyber-safety.html. But I think it's borderline whether that meets the threshold of  or the , and given that it's an autobiography that has had unresolved issues for years, I'm leaning towards delete. Maybe someone can have another stab at it in a few years. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom.  Doesn't appear to meet  or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)