Deletion of Honorverse concepts and terminology

Comment: as it has no real-world notability.  After a week at AfD and numerous voices shouting to keep this article, ''there has yet to be one reliable source added''. This article is still a collection of |in-universe fancruft, without any |reliable sources that assert |notability in the real world, as required by . No amount of "cleaning up" can magically create notability if none exists to begin with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:INUNIVERSE||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:WAF)

Comment: No notability asserted, completely fails #PLOT. Simply because stuff is "important" doesn't mean that we have an article on it. What is "important" as far as we're concerned is stuff that is covered by |reliable, independent sources. This isn't
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS)