Deletion of Paleoscience

Comment: or alternatively turn into a disambiguation page). No indication that 'paleoscience' is "addressed directly in detail" by any reliable source, as opposed to simply mentioned in passing as a useful (if neologistic) collective term for various scientific fields. It therefore seems unlikely that this article will grow beyond a  without extensive 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF||WP:OR)

Comment: while there are http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Paleoscience%22 some scholarly articles, I could find http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Paleoscience%22 no news articles on point (one was a 404 error), and http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Paleoscience%22 few textbook references.  I'm not saying the can't be re-created, but right now it's a |neologism. See also  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:CRYSTAL||WP:HAMMER)

Comment: Not a commonly enough used concept and would likely need  to make it article worthy.  Maybe if the phrasing becomes more used over time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: although current article is poor there are sources out there for this topic that satisfy . Whilst it's true that |Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this article has the potential to be expanded into something worthwhile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTDICT)