Deletion of Nonsymmetric gravitational theory

Comment: 864 hits (I got 855) is actually pretty good for an abstruse cosmological theory.  Encouragingly, most of these links are to bona-fide publications in various physics journals.  As for the nominator's claim that this is a “one person theory”, the publications I found are by a number of scientists from different institutions.  While I'm not convinced as to the merits of the NGT, it certainly appears notable enough, has a number of potential verifiable sources (all these published papers), and appears to attract physicists rather than cranks, which is a good sign.  No, it is not a mainstream theory, but then #PAPER|Wikipedia is not paper; there is room here for less popular theories, as long as they are legitimate.  The article could use some more citations, but this is grounds for editorial work, not deletion.  Again, I'm ''not'' saying that NGT is true; I'm not supporting the theory, but I am supporting its inclusion on Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)