Deletion of Vp.art

Comment: No assertion of notability and no |reliable sources backing-up the assertions made in this article. By way of explanation, Wikipedia is a "tertiary" source of information. That is to say, there a "primary sources" - things that are out there in the real world (works of art, in this case), then there are "secondary sources" - writers and academics who write about the primary sources in reliable newspapers, books or academic journals. Then there are tertiary sources like Wikipedia which draw on the reliable secondary sources. If there are no reliable sources then we cannot have an article on the subject. None of the links in this article fulfil that criterion, and a google search doesn't find any, either. This is not pettiness or censorship - it's one of the core policies of Wikipedia. For more information you should read  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: per nom. Not particularly notable. It actually is a variety of audio art not a movement or medium in its own right.  applies here, I believe
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The books listed as references have nothing to do with "Vp.art". Essentially, this is original research and a |neologism. This isn't appropriate for an encyclopedia. If there were specific, third-party references ''about'' Vp.art, that would be different. But as it stands, this is a non-notable art form
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)