Deletion of Maud Mitchell

Comment: WP:RS|not a single source in the article is reliable. This page appears to be one of a string of |memorials for someone's family members. Even though she's deceased, the allegation that the subject was the member of a |criminal organization makes me especially wary. There's |no evidence that she was at |notable for any reason. I remind the gentle reader that we are a charity, not a free obit service. The subject, on its face, was |an ordinary person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:CRIME||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:MILL)

Comment: per nom. The main potential claims to notability seem to be  (based on subject's membership of IRA and C na mB),  (based on subject's book) or  (based on general coverage of the subject). In terms of MILPERSON there is no evidence that the subject held a rank or received any award to distinguish them from the tens of thousands of other people who participated in the War of Independence. In terms of NAUTHOR, a single family-memoir publication does not meet the expectations of the guideline. And, in terms of GNG, there just doesn't seem to be enough coverage to establish notability (a single passing mention in a real-estate advertorial piece falls short of SIGCOV by some distance). That we are relying on a user-generated genealogical website to support the content would seem to reinforce the lack of significant coverage to support the content. Mine is a firm "delete" recommendation. (The author might also do well to heed the notes from several editors about not using Wikipedia as a free web-host for content better suited to a family history blog or to ancestry.com. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MILPERSON||WP:AUTHOR||WP:GNG||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: per nom. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR)