Deletion of List of new religious movements

Comment: I came to this deletion debate with a clear mind as ''new'' is a vague term.  What's the inclusion criteria?  Clearly stated and sources listed to support it.  Could someone argue that an individual entry might not meet inclusion criteria? Certainly, but that's not a reason for deletion.   concerns are valid, but again must be adhered to, not a reason for deletion.   is so abundantly clear that I am still surprised the ''Category already exists'' argument is still made. The only plausible reason for deletion would be that this list violates  which the listed sources demonstrate is not the case.  Ill-concieved and unsupported nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOTDUP||WP:NOTESAL)

Comment: mdash;per Postdlf and above.  see  for why the argument about lists v. categories is a red herring.  also, regardless of whether some people mean "cult" when they say "nrm", the term "nrm" is well delineated and self explanatory.  if the religious movement is new, it can go on the list, and we don't have to worry about whether some people think it's a cult or not.  this is the accepted term in the academic study of the subject, and i see no reason to second-guess it.&mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP)