Deletion of Titan (Warhammer 40,000)

Comment: The forgeworld links are catalogue entries.  The codexes are published by Games Workshop (the creator of 40K and EPIC), as is http://books.google.com/books?id=GjIXAAAACAAJ&dq=isbn:1844162427&ei=Osx1SKXhK4GkjgHZ8cTpBw the work of fiction referenced as a source (Note the publisher is Games Workshop).  Does not use material from independent sources to establish notability per the enacted , the proposed , or the proposed .  Warhammer 40k is notable.  Daughter elements of the 40k universe (and play mechanics) are not necessarily notable.  If reliable secondary sources are produced which attest to the notability of the article, then it may be retained in a form that at least marginally complies with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOYS||WP:FICT||WP:WAF)

Comment: no non-trivial coverage by |reliable sources independent of the topic that assert any notability. Fails #PLOT
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOT)

Comment: fails enacted , the proposed , or the proposed  as noted by protonk. As some might be aware, I've been working extensively in this area and that also has involved quite a lot of off-line work looking at the source material and looking for sources - the truth is, it doesn't exist or the coverage is so marginal as not to matter for daughter articles such as this. The whole warhammer 40k area should be about a 3rd of it's current size
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOYS||WP:FICT)