Deletion of List of people who have walked across Tasmania, Australia

Comment: The nomination is quite subjective and based upon personal opinion, rather than the depth of coverage in reliable sources, and I wholly disagree with the notion of the topic being "of local interest only". Defining an island state as "local" is problematic from the start. Per , the overall topic has an enduring historical significance as evidenced per ongoing coverage in reliable sources, and the topic has been widely covered in diverse sources. Also, subjects in the list appear to be notable for one event per . Regarding such articles, , (part of the Manual of Style for stand-alone lists) states (underline emphasis mine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT||WP:BLP1E||WP:LISTPEOPLE)

Comment: The applicable notability guideline that nobody has brought up is , which would require substantial |RS coverage of people who have walked across Tasmania ''as a group or set'', not just of individual walkers. I don't see any such coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL||WP:RS)

Comment: The circumstances surrounding this article are different from List of people who have walked the perimeter of Tasmania, Australia. That was a single-person list; this list has seven people on it, so  shouldn't apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)