Deletion of Shambling mound

Comment: per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shambling Mound|the previous AfD, as the article's sourcing has not improved at all after the previous discussion, and then |salt to prevent further recreation attempts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: As non-notable cruft. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE)

Comment: per nom. Wikipedia is not the monster manual. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE)

Comment: NNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!! this can't be deleted as its an iconic (to D&Ders anyway) monster!! but coola with no |reliable sources available this has to be a '''delete''', ..... okay
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The history of this article is a bit confusing, but it would appear that this was already deleted once at AFD, recreated as a redirect to Plant creatures (Dungeons & Dragons), and then, like so many other previously deleted/redirected D&D articles, restored to a full article against consensus by a anonymous IP editor.  Regardless of this, though, it does not pass the .  The only sources are primary or trivial, and the article it was split out from is, itself, undergoing an AFD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)