Deletion of Jothydev Kesavadev

Comment: does not pass  based on publications but after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Jones (scientist) we can hardly argue that we should keep Lisa Jones and delete this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: per  at the least.  I don't see a pass of  C1 here -- possibly .  I'm uncertain about the case for C3, but since the RCP fellowship is not supported by a reliable source (and I didn't succeed in finding one), I don't think this forms a good keep argument for the article.  Meanwhile, there is little from the current text of the article that would go into an eventual article on the subject.  I certainly don't think that we should take a no-consensus close on |another article (with particularly tart comments from the closing admin about poor keep arguments) as forming any kind of precedent
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NPROF||WP:TOOSOON||WP:WHATABOUTX)

Comment: Citation record doesn't support #C1 and the article is too heavily promotional and padded for me to tell whether there might be anything else of actual notability hidden in it.  and #G11 are also relevant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:TNT||WP:CSD)

Comment: Does the fellowship with the Royal College of Physicians (or any of the other fellowships listed) suffice for  C3
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: while the page is a promotional eye sore, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32356245/ this publication might meet criteria one of . Other pubs are borderline. I'm unable to verify Royal * memberships( blame my mobile device if not lack of RS
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)