Deletion of Pigasus (politics)

Comment: Yes, copious sources in newspapers and books, and the nominator should be severely trouted for not performing  or even just looking at the links already in the article such as the one to the ''St. James Encyclopedia of Pop Culture
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per added sources and improvements made by Edison. Meets |notability threshold
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Have you tried a  Google Books search, such as using the terms "Pigasus" and "Yippies"? There's a significant number of books out there
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (:WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources; it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Presently the article is full of silly jokes and counterfactual statements, violating  and lacking |reliable sources.  But certainly there was press coverage of the "Pigasus" swine candidate  put forward by Yippies in 1968, and he is as fitting a subject for an article as the various pets of famous people, such as Presidential dogs and cats, whose articles have been upheld in numerous AFDs.  I will see if sources are available at the online sources to which free access is available
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)