Deletion of 2013 Hillsboro Hops season

Comment: Article is very well sourced, far surpassing the |general notability guideline. Whether or not others create articles about other teams' seasons, as others have brought up, is not relevant to this discussion. The GNG is
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: How about a link to one of those prior discussions? Otherwise I have added only a few sources, and there are usually at least two sources for each game, thus it would meet the  - which usually trumps the generally speaking types of items. I understand perhaps in the past people just looked these as minor league seasons, but even minor league teams get as much media coverage as small college football teams, and we do have seasons for those. We also do seasons for what are in essence minor league soccer teams. And before someone mentions  please note that cuts both ways with the arguments above regarding ones that were deleted. Lastly, since the argument for deletion is notability, did the nominator complete the required ? Again, hopefully that helps make the point that each article should be considered on its merits, as the general outcomes is really where you are judging a topic to determine if the article is notable on an inherit basis, instead of judging it for what is actually in the article. As in, is the topic notable on its own when you put aside that some prior seasons may have been deleted? Otherwise it is like saying numerous road articles have been deleted as non-notable, therefor all road articles should be deleted, and that is simply faulty logic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: There are indeed many sources, but they are the kind of |routine local news coverage that doesn't really establish encylopedic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)