Deletion of Multiverse (religion)

Comment: per nom - This is definitely a case of pure .  Even if there is an argument that a legitimate article with a similar title could be made, this should not be kept in the mean time, as Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thoughts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per nom and above delete points, especially |fringe |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per nom and -yness.--Surv1v4l1st
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: The nomination's claim that multiverses are purely a matter of physics is false.  Here's a book on the subject – ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Y0lWBQAAQBAJ God and the Multiverse'' – and there are plenty more with similar titles.  As the topic is notable, our policies ,  and  indicate that we should improve the article rather than deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment: Too many issues with  and suboptimal sources, too little to keep if using one of the rare decent ones that could support the topic.  Alternatively selective '''merge in religious cosmology''', perhaps
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: article fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: as |fringe |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:SYNTH)