Deletion of Mayank

Comment: Now it does have a ''visible'' , although given name articles don't compulsorily need one.  We just need to have multiple biograpies of people with a particular given name. Also, deprodding isn't a valid deletion rationale either. In short, both of the nominator's good-faith rationales are redundant now. Everything else has already been explained by Uanfala
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: alternate: rename as a disambig or Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Set index articles|set index page) and '''Reply''': Where did the information ''"Now it does have a ''visible'' , although given name articles don't compulsorily need one"'' come from.  (a guideline) states " If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.", and also "In the event or of a contradiction between this guideline and our policies regarding sourcing and attribution, the policies take priority and editors should seek to resolve the discrepancy.".  (a policy) states "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, '''lists''' and captions, must be verifiable.". '''Comments''': Anyway, this single sourced BLP related "stub-article/list" would certainly seem better as a disambig page or a set index article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)