Deletion of Brogrammer (2nd nomination)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: this certainly could use some copy-editing, but clearly this is |notable based on the |significant coverage in multiple reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Last time the decision was not "keep" but rather "no consensus", so I don't understand how the last nomination would be an argument either way. Also, many of the people who said keep argued that it could improve, which it hasn't. Finally, the subject of the article seems to be getting less relevant over time, which might bring  into play
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)