Deletion of Kwiboo

Comment: No reliable sources that show notability per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Lack of reliable sources to establish notability, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: per , as I believe someone already mentioned
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: fails , insofar as the company has not received significant coverage in secondary sources.  This is Wikipedia, not Google
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: WP:VSCA|vanispamcruftisement. Also, |trout or minnow the employees and send them towards Wikipedia:Conflict of interest so they can understand why we're not buying the keep !votes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:TROUT)

Comment: Needs |reliable sources to establish that it is notable per . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CORP)

Comment: Not notable per , Probably also a |conflict of interest-- this and the Paul Marshall (kwiboo) article are largely authored by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:COI)