Deletion of Matthew Roe

Comment: all fail  and it seems like a clear case of ; great that he has a hobby he enjoys but Wikipedia is not the place to make yourself notable, and a single local PBS aware is certainly not enough to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROMO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Agree with '''Collectionian''' regarding  and . But I get the distinct impression that Roe is one serious young filmmaker and that within a few years there will be sufficient notability for an article. He's certainly put a great deal of effort into this current attempt at a Wikipedia presence, autobiographical though it seems to be. I am going to do a bit of digging to see if there isn't anything out there about this guy. I would like to add a general comment, though, regarding Public Access Television and possible awards given by shows on that venue: There are some very serious and worthwhile people working the public access circuit, and the whole genre should not be written off. Perhaps the most damning thing about Roe's main article is a complete lack of IMDB listings, which are not quite as easy to get as some in here seem to believe, at least without the outright purchase of an IMDB resume
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:PROMO)

Comment: per , alled garden,  and .  All of the above assert no notability apart from association with each other, and have no significant coverage online from eliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:W||WP:AUTO||WP:PROMO||WP:R)