Deletion of 2013 Mother's Day Parade shooting

Comment: Are you kidding me?  This has been a very well-publicized incident and plainly passes .  I am quite aghast at the level of societal bias we have when the Boston Marathon bombings cause the shutdown of an entire city, but a mass shooting of this type arouses barely a murmur, a shrug, and a $10,000 reward.  We can't counter this bias by ignoring a lack of attention, but in this case, we need merely not magnify it further by ignoring perfectly good sources.  This is not "routine news coverage" on the level of the police blotter and obituaries in one local paper which is what should be what we have in mind when that is spoken of
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per ; we need to discuss a proposal for a cooling-off period (Dennis Brown's 6-hour suggestion sounds reasonable) before the creation of an article. Much media coverage is attributable to the 24-hour news cycle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: As far as events go this is a relatively routine news story, which is |not what Wikipedia is for. In addition, despite the wide range of sources presented, the majority of them are merely |quotes/rehashings of other stories on the event, largely from the New Orleans-based Times-Picayune—an indicator that the event |likely doesn't have any national or international impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:DIVERSE||WP:GEOSCOPE)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)