Deletion of Jim Tucker

Comment: as per DGG.  Not sure he qualifies as an academic, but easily meets  with articles such as those in major local publications as the San Francisco Chronicle and major national publications such as the National Post
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Brr, the study of past lives memories from reincarnation. Personally, I find this pretty preposterous. However, the media coverage cited in the article seems sufficient to me for passing , even for a fringe science/pseudo-science topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: This is a definite case for the judicious application of #Independent sources, but the ''SFGate'' and ''Discover'' are enough for me. ''Merge'' to Reincarnation research could also work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Fails , no significant coverage in several independent sources. Note to nom, surviving this AfD wouldn't be a good reason to remove the tag; if it does survive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)