Deletion of Voronezh UFO incident

Comment: per  - or more accurately 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTEVENNEWSJUSTLAZYJOURNALISTSFILLERFLUFF)

Comment: Hoax or not? (I don't believe in UFOs at all, nor I am a fan of the topic, for what it's worth) Such considerations for notability are irrelevant. It has been covered in multiple RS, especially ufology books (and well, what else should cover UFO sightings?), so  definitely does not apply: this is not routine news at all. See http://books.google.de/books?id=tuUI61coh4gC&pg=PA87&dq=voronezh+ufo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bPA6U_DdKMO7ygONvYDoDg&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=voronezh%20ufo&f=false, http://books.google.de/books?id=pCWCfLCJOrkC&pg=PA325&dq=voronezh+ufo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bPA6U_DdKMO7ygONvYDoDg&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=voronezh%20ufo&f=false, http://books.google.de/books?id=P3TNDx9lNMsC&pg=PA60&dq=voronezh+ufo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bPA6U_DdKMO7ygONvYDoDg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=voronezh%20ufo&f=false, http://books.google.de/books?id=jeFuAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA204&dq=voronezh+ufo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bPA6U_DdKMO7ygONvYDoDg&ved=0CFIQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=voronezh%20ufo&f=false, http://books.google.de/books?id=WwYRW5zQnQcC&pg=PA136&dq=voronezh+ufo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=bPA6U_DdKMO7ygONvYDoDg&ved=0CGQQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=voronezh%20ufo&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  as this does not seem to be an event of "lasting, historical significance". The article suggests that the sighting became "one of the most famous UFO and alien sightings in Russia", which would be enough to establish notability if true, but this claim has no context (during that week? in history? even 25 years later?) and more importantly no source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: because all coverage is due to "News of the Weird" or "Slow News Day" phenomenon explicitly warned against in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:NFRINGE)

Comment: Article has three big-name media sources; that passes WP:GNG.  The only potential weak point I can see by that standard is that U.S. media sources might be argued not to be "independent" of Tass, being cold war and media rivals, but if you were to maintain that it would change how many articles about the Soviet Union are judged for any purpose.  The fact it's a mass delusion with no real basis is irrelevant - for example, we have articles about Bitcoin and several satanic ritual abuse witch-trials.  Once people deploy real resources based on a delusion it is no longer nonexistent.  Any invocation of  is wrong because our mainstream sources are giving the overall "normal" point of view of commentators about the subject.  You don't say a subject itself is "fringe" based on your opinion of it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)