Deletion of Inner Banks (2nd nomination)

Comment: If you read all of my comments, you can see I changed my opinion.  The REGION being described is a coherant region.  The NAME of the region is a new name for an old region.  Until it recieves more coverage, what we should do is '''rename''' the article, '''redirect''' "inner banks" to thge newly named article, and '''rewrite''' the article (with sources) to indicate the alternative name.  For example for how this works, see what typing Kings County, New York turns up.  That name is a LESSER USED name for what is Brooklyn.  The two designations are COTERMINOUS, and thus redundant.  We don't need two articles where one will do.  I posit that while Inner Banks is a valid name for the region, it does NOT describe a region different than the North Carolina Coastal Plain, and thus while ALL of the information in the article should be kept, we should name the article with the MORE WIDELY RECOGNIZED name.  If you are positing that the Inner Banks is somehow different than the North Carolina Coastal Plain, then PROVIDE SOURCES that indicate so, and show how it is a different region.  The article AS IT IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN does not give evidence to that point.  Oh, and you keep bringing up other articles that should be deleted.  If you want another article's deletion, please |Nominate that article for deletion.  The existance of another deletable article has NO BEARING on the status of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)