Deletion of Commissioner Service (Boy Scouts of America)

Comment: to Leadership in the Boy Scouts of America#Commissioner Service. Despite the lengthy lists of sources presented above, I have yet to find anything that both provides significant coverage and is independent of the Boy Scouts: each non-Boy Scout source provides nothing more than a trivial, often single-sentence mention. The topic thus fails the GNG. There's no need to merge anything: all of the relevant encyclopedic content is already found in the article I linked above. Redirecting ensures that readers reach relevant content, the lack of notability notwithstanding. (It's also |cheap
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)

Comment: Quite a few new sources have been presented here. The question is, do any meet ? Which of those discuss this concept in depth (let's say, a dedicated paragraph), or contain claims of significance, saying something like "the Commissioner Service is a significant" etc.? I'll ping
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: or a '''selective merge''' to another scouting article if someone wants to. I don't see much of a case that the subject meets the |general notability guideline, which expects significant coverage of the subject in third-party reliable sources. The sources cited in the article and those listed in the AfD are either written/published by the Boy Scouts of America or an affiliated organisation (not independent) or only mention the subject in passing, usually in a piece about a commissioner (not significant coverage). This is important, if a subject doesn't meet the general notability guideline then it's very hard to write a substantial article on it without running into big problems. The reliance on non-independent sources does really show in the prose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources in the article are mostly  and/or fail  because they are in some way associated with the BSA.  Some fail ; a facebook post, really?  Of the high-quality sources I looked at (Forbes, NY Times), those are all just passing mentions in biographies of past office holders.  Most of the content is puffery and/or trivia.  This is already covered in Leadership in the Boy Scouts of America#Commissioner Service.  I could see expanding that section somewhat by incorporating a '''small amount''' of the '''most significant''' and '''best-sourced''' material from here.  I could also see breaking out the "List of National Commissioners" section as a Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists|stand-alone list (but the Olmstead entry needs sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:INDEPENDENT||WP:RS)