Deletion of Palestinian Jesus

Comment: I am undecided here, as I have always enjoyed the rather absurd debate around this question. I suggest we decide on the basis of the '''''' criteria. If we look past all the POV sources here, what are the three high quality sources that the proposers intend this article to be based upon
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:THREE)

Comment: per . Buidhe has added some decent sources. Merge would probably be better if someone can find a good target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY)

Comment: I've checked all the sources that had links, but only one source actually had the term ''"Palestinian Jesus"''. It was Will Stalder's source from Google books. I need special access to Fishman-Duker, Rivkah source (I think it was written by Susannah Heschel), so I can't verify it. The article seems to be built mainly upon a compilation of different news sources that basically argue the ideal Jesus was a Palestinian, but it never discusses the term itself, history or its use etc. Rather, some of the sources are supporting different events under the "Proponents" section of the article, but Wikipedia is not the news per  violation. And WP:HEY is neither policy or guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Race and appearance of Jesus. We have managed to find a balancing scholarly source, and had some healthy discussion on the talk page. The question that this article addresses is not going away any time soon. But I do not think, at the moment, there is quite enough to pass all the  tests. I suggest a redirect, so that we maintain the page history and talk discussion, and if the subsection on the Race and Appearance article is built out over time, it can then be considered again for a separate article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)