Deletion of Nokia 1600 (3rd nomination)

Comment: Please see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)

Comment: Well all that being said, the link to your main point of argument is broken! Of course consensus can change, but still, the consensus does not seem to be outright deletion. Also, i think the steady growth of WP isn't necessarily automatically maturing, since there are many new people who post rubbish articles. Again, why bother with this article at all, it's here, it's been here 2 years, not enough people took offense. Again, what's the point of listing all inhabited places in the world, most never ever noted by any of us, but not to include a phone millions of people know from experience. That does not compute for me. And also,  is NOT, I repeat, NOT policy! I could just as well write an essay outlining why OSE is a completely valid argument. OSE is used every day in WP, as an argument to create all sorts of stuff. Most of which never gets deleted. Using  is just as invalid in this argument as me claiming OSE is
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: Consider me slapped. :) Alright, so I'm obviously wrong on the "PC remote is unique" argument.  However, I think my other arguments are still valid.  I think Wikipedia:Other stuff exists|there is other stuff like this, so we should keep this one, too, is not a valid argument, and I would probably vote "merge and redirect" for the Blackberry client phones you linked to, as well.  As for "it was already kept twice", see onsensus#Consensus Can Change.  Especially since, as Wikipedia matures, and our number of articles grows, arguments for inclusion have been undergoing much more rigorous scrutiny than before.  I think the other "redirect" votes above are evidence that, for some of us at least, the previous consensus is no longer valid.  Also, I would point out that the result of the first discussion was in fact '''no consensus''', which ''defaults'' to keep.  I would point you to , as well.  As for searching for gadgets on google, google WILL still give the redirect as a search result, and since I am urging that we keep all the Nokia 1600 ''info'' in the Nokia products article, it is not as if we are therefore preventing users from finding information about the phone
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:PRODUCT)