Deletion of List of Republican sex scandals

Comment: violates  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: violates , , , , , and , and because Ansell voted to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB||WP:NPOV||WP:BALLS||WP:BEANS||WP:OR)

Comment: even if renamed, still would be seriously POV and would basically require being reworked from scratch. Would still also be in violation of  as in "Wikipedia is not a mirror", as this content is basically a copy/paste from a POV/Left-Leaning wiki: http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Republican_Sex_Scandals here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a soapbox. See also . Also, By definition, its POV. I would feel better abott keeping the article if it didn't focus on just ONE political party or set of political values
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:AWW)

Comment: per Schizombie.  Yeah, I know ''he'' voted keep.  I'm going to be a bit nuanced, so it's kind of hard to put something in bold up front, but I will explain this discrepancy.  As it stands, this article is an egregious example of  and I suspect it was put here in the interests of making a couple of s in the light of the debate on the ''other'' article.  Also, I'm pretty sure that the people calling this list encyclopedic didn't read very far down.  This article is a mismash of fact, allegation, innuendo, and just plain insanity.  Some of the entries are bona-fide sex scandals, but the rest is simply junk: several of the entries are just assertions that some person got divorced, or has had out-of-wedlock children.  One more notable example is Rush Limbaugh; this article simply asserts he has been divorced three times.  All well and good, but how on earth is this a ''sex scandal''?  One also notes with some amusement that this article insinuates that George W. Bush raped a woman and later had her killed.  Somehow, I didn't hear about that on the news... :-)  Seriously, guys, this is a perfect article for dKosopedia.  And, hey, look http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Republican_Sex_Scandals here and http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Moral_Values here!  What a coincidence.  Tying this all together, I would say that what needs to happen to this article is that about 85% of the stuff in here needs to go (as we come up with an objective standard of what "sex scandal" is in the first place), it needs to be renamed to a NPOV name, and then all of the analogous Democratic and other non-right-wing stuff needs to be added here as well.  In short, I am advocating exactly what ??????? said.  But the cleanest way to do that, I think, is to just destroy this article and start over.  One notes that since a copy of all of this information exists at dKosipedia, then any of these entries can be copied from over there.  One also notes that exactly zero people did zero work on this article, as it is a straight cut-and-paste from another site, so we're losing no labor by deleting it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:POINT)

Comment: to List of political sex scandals in the United States. After much deliberation (I nearly slapped an AFD tag on it myself when I ran across this article earlier today, I have decided that this topic can (and, much more importantly, should) be cleaned up enough to comply with 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per Deville, #Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files|WP is not a mirror.  Some of the content may merit keeping, but perhaps it would be better to start from a new article.  Keep if someone can radically demirror and dePOV the article. before the AfD closure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)