Deletion of Chomskybot (2nd nomination)

Comment: I looked through the seven pages of Google books results and found Wikipedia scrapers (fake books whose contents are Wikipedia articles), trivial mentions (e.g. mentioning it briefly in the lineage of other software http://books.google.com/books?id=lwaRyOZfBzgC&pg=PA114; a footnote that mentions Chomskybot as an example of something that could be coded in Perl http://books.google.com/books?id=fLzjrrJ6hW0C&pg=PA169), circular references (descriptions of Chomskybot that refer back to Wikipedia for more details e.g. http://books.google.com/books?id=RK-EQU-u030C&pg=PA55), and many books that do not mention Chomskybot because Google apparently no longer makes it possible to filter out the results that it thinks are related but that do not include the actual search phrase. With the possible exception of the Yellow Pages book mentioned by Psychonaut, what I did not find is anything in-depth that could be used as an argument for notability based on . Google scholar also came up empty. As for Google web search itself, I think http://xkcd.com/1334/ the most recent xkcd is apposite. So unless new and better specific references turn up, I am not convinced by the "just do a search" argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)