Deletion of Mark Morningstar

Comment: The subject has received some significant coverage in a reliable source, such as http://www.mlive.com/grandblanc/index.ssf/2011/03/natural_wellness_and_pain_reli.html this article in ''The Flint Journal'', which was found using the Google news link atop this discussion. However, I'm not finding additional significant coverage to qualify an article for the subject; does not meet  at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: as the very embodiment of non-notable. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Morningstar&type=revision&diff=692149114&oldid=692117343 This deprodding ought to win some sort of award for over-literal application of rules; yes, the  template technically shouldn't be used if the article contains any kind of reference, but a deadlink to the subject's own website used for the sole purpose of proving they exist is clearly not a "source" in any meaningful sense of the word.&nbsp;&#8209;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people (WP:BLPPROD)