Deletion of Evo Morales grounding incident

Comment: with Bolivia–United States relations. Not independently notable per  (which says "most ... political news" is "usually not notable"): it may have had consequences in conjunction with other events (the tensions between Morales' administration and the USA; the Snowden affair), but it makes sense to cover it in conjunction with those events. There are no shortage of merge targets: Bolivia–United States relations, Edward_Snowden#Morales_plane_incident, Evo Morales. If someone can show that this event specifically had lasting effects it would be notable (a conference a few days later doesn't seem to be a lasting effect, and it only played a small role in the Snowden story - these recent articles from the top of a Google search don't mention ithttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/02/is-edward-snowden-prisoner-in-russiahttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23123964http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/02/world/europe/uk-snowden-book
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: The  policy is ''always'' misapplied, and this is no exception, as the policy actually says to treat recent events just like older ones.  The GNG is well met.  But in this case, even playing the game of demonstrating exceptional 'enduring' notability, this incident has had a long term effect on the bilateral relations of several nations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)