Deletion of English royal descent from Muhammad

Comment: quoting the article, "There have been attempts to establish the descent of the medieval English monarchs from the Islamic prophet Muhammad. None has yet been successful, and no such descent is generally accepted." This also doesn't provide any evidence that this theory passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: This article (like the other one I mentioned above) is not really about the English/British royal family at all. I think it actually gives |undue weight to a small minority within the many European royals and nobles who may be descended from Zaida of Seville and thus (perhaps) from the Prophet. I'd urge a '''merge''' with the article about Princess Zaida
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: it appears to be a genuine |fringe theory but - so far - there don't seem to be any identified |reliable sources that demonstrate the mainstream view and would allow for an article that is both |neutral and |verifiable to be written which would give the proper |weight to all relevant opinions. The lack of sourcing also makes it questionable whether the theory can be considered to meet the |general notability criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:RS||WP:NPOV||WP:V||WP:UNDUE||WP:NN)

Comment: notability established |the usual way.  There's no reason to override the usual standards because people don't like the contents of the article.  At least, I find such arguments unconvincing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)