Deletion of Ruby Jagrut

Comment: i have concerns that, as it stands, this article does not show that Jagrut meets , although the number of |sources cited may lead to , out of respect for one of the above keepers (hi {{u|PamD}}{{=)}}, hey coola! you're not meant to do that! well i am, so there:)) i'm staying on the fence. ps. as for upe/coi, these are heavy claims especially at a new editor, why do we regularly ignore |don't be bitey
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BITE)

Comment: While I see no evidence that the subject meets , there is sustained (2011-2018) significant coverage in reliable independent sources (such as the ''Deccan Herald'', ''Times of India'', ''The Hindu'', ''New Indian Express''). One issue is that most of the articles include a lot of quotes from the artist (based on interviews?), so those parts of the articles would considered primary sources. However, they are not solely interviews/quotes. I have added one more source, and done a tiny bit of editing for a more encyclopaedic tone. More could be done - also, more information from the sources could be added. But that is a case for improvement, not for deletion. The article has already been substantially improved in content, tone and referencing since it was nominated for AfD, so the  rationale for the AfD no longer exists (and there is no evidence of , and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST||WP:PROMO||WP:COI||WP:PAID)