Deletion of Sports calendar March 2007

Comment: as the creation entirely novel list topics contravene the prohibition on #OR|original research as illustrated by . As far as I can see, this list, or anything like it, has not be been published anywhere except within Wikipedia, so there is no evidence that it is verifiable, let alone notable. To demonstrate that this topic was not created based on editor's own idea, a verifiable definition is needed to provide external validation that this list complies with |content policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:MADEUP||WP:CONPOL)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: I don't know which is worse, having an article where March begins in February, or a #NEWS article that lists the events of a month in reverse order (in this case, a backward march-- 31 March, 30 March, 29 March, etc.).  This one seems to be the lesser of two evils, in that it's heavy on sources, takes up a lot less space (9,764 bytes vs. a ridiculous 79,699, and it doesn't look like an editor copying scores off of the sports section every morning.  For some reason, this one is nominated and the other isn't
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)