Deletion of Commendo

Comment: I see enough to satisfy , though feel the article is vanity cos, let's face it, it is written as a PR piece by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Erik, all of the sources that you put in, in order: #1 is the corporate site, which is a primary source.  Encyclopedias being tertiary sources do not use primary sources, being |original research.  However, it is okay as an external link.  #2 and #10 is just a partner-program mention, which is considered a "trivial mention" under the |verifiability criteria.  #3 and #4 are real articles, but they too mention Commendo in passing (there was around 1-2 sentences on the company).  Moreover #4 is directly from a Commendo employee, which is a primary source.  #5 and #6 are wikis, not |reliable (no fact-checking process at all).  The press coverage is usually quoted from press releases issued by the company, and therefore is also a primary source.  #7 and #11 are also only trivial mentions, and while #8 is a substantial article, it establishes the notability of Reynaldo Gil, not Commendo.  What you need is a magazine or newspaper article whose ''subject'' is the company in question
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: nn, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)