Deletion of G 57

Comment: A cursory Google search for "G 57 Nigeria" offers a number of news stories about continued national level advocacy by this group as the primary subject of articles, enough to meet . Over the next couple days I'll write text to include based on found sources to introduce to the article. English language Wikipedia based on its contributions is in a de facto state of being Euro-America centric, but by including articles like this on national groups active in African politics we can broaden the geographic scope of Wikipedia's coverage. It is important to avoid approaching articles on the politics of other nation-states with a colonial mindset
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)

Comment: article fullfills ,  and  (an additional online search will reveal several more reliable sources). The nominating editor is kindly advised to please respect |Wikipdia's Content Guideline on News Organizations. Repeatedly discrediting national daily newspapers, calling their websites "not reliable", is a direct violation of . If the nominating editor continues to discredit Nigerian daily newspapers, he will be reported to the Administrators board
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:NGO||WP:NEWSORG||WP:NEWSORG)

Comment: The nominator misrepresents the state of this article, frankly. While there are no inline refs, the two of the three external links seem to be reliable sources indicating notability for this group. (The third, BBC, does not refer to the group of signatories as a single entity.) And given the apparent prominence of this group within Nigeria, I'd say  applies, as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)