Deletion of Maryville High School

Comment: all schools below the university level per |Wikipedia is not a junkyard. Although I could probably live with them being made into redirects to really offensive sex acts per #Wikipedia_is_not_censored|Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: I'm not sure if the second one is meant as a |point or not but this does seem to illustrate the degree of division among school editors
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: alternative standard? Just use a similar standard for schools as we use for people or even better corporations and companies. Are they run-of-the-mill, or are they exceptional? Are there multiple non-trivial references in secondary, major publications ()? Taking this school as an example: the only reason I can see for keeping it are the School championships. Having a unique mascotte is quite trivial. Now, I can't find a source for e.g. the wrestling titles, so I can't judge if this is true, and how important this is. And this is a problem with many school articles I have supported the deletion of: either they have no non-trivial info at all, or it is all unreferenced and stays so even after asked for verification. As  clearly says, it is up to those wanting to keep something (either a claim or a whole article) to provide references, not for those wanting to delete it.  So in general, my school standards are a combination of ,  and the general idea of . Satisfactory
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:V||WP:CORP)