Deletion of Toronto Slutwalk

Comment: This is major; even if it doesn't become a regular event like other protest marches on which we have articles, its geographical scope more than qualifies it to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: but consider move to Slutwalk as the phenomenon spreads: see http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/980589--slutwalk-marches-expand-to-the-u-s-and-england http://www.calgaryherald.com/technology/Calgary+Slutwalk+attracts+strange+bedfellows/4644911/story.html http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2011/04/21/phillys-slutwalk-rallying-against-rapes-blame-game/ http://www.the33tv.com/news/kdaf-slut-walk-hits-dallas-streets-story,0,2823196.story). Notability seems well confirmed: geographic scope and persistence of coverage seem on their way). The POV and essay issues are substantial but not grounds for deletion; the final essay-style section is fundamentally about the motivations and arguments of the protesters which can be ''attributed'' rather than stated as a fact, or pulled where it is |undue weight for an article about the protest itself
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)