Deletion of Hengkai

Comment: The Qing dynasty was deposed in 1912, and has no prospects for restoration at this late date(they did have a bit of a puppet comeback during WW2 Japanese rule of China), so even if he is descended from a Qing royal, he is not "in a line of succession" to become a head of state or national hereditary officeholder. This "line of succession" is very unclear, since the rules of succession were changed a couple of times in the 20th century (see Jin Youzhi for some details). Sometimes it has invloved being "adopted" or "designated as a successor" by an actual ruling emperor. With the passage of time and being out of power by the dynasty no one would be living who had been thus adopted or named as a successor. These articles then become a collection of original research. There is no automatic assumption of notability as in some royal lines which actually have a Queen in power somewhere. No references are supplied to document his ancestry, so questionable |verifiability. Even if references documented his ancestry, there's nothing here to satisfy  unless multiple independent and reliable sources have significant coverage of him. Certainly if a supposed descendant of an Emperor or King does something in his own right which satisfies  then he should have an article. This individual is said by the article to be just working as an electrician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:BIO)