Deletion of Christian Tessier

Comment: As it stands, this is a substantial  violation, because no claims ''in the article'' are sourced at all. The sole source provided is for a single role in the list
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: NACTOR is not a golden ticket to uncontestable notability. It's a ''presumptive'' standard - we ''presume'' that people who meet one or more of the criteria are probably going to have generated sufficient coverage to meet , and that's usually true (or else we'd rewrite the criteria). But if we can't ''confirm'' that there is sufficient N-satisfying coverage (remember, N requires substantial coverage at a broad, not simply local level), then the article fails the notability test and we cannot keep it. &spades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's possible to compile a list of their roles — and further, the vast majority of the roles listed here are supporting or guest appearances as minor characters, some of whom didn't even have names. So there are only a few roles here that might have been notable enough to count as "significant" for the purposes of  — but even then, NACTOR still isn't passed just because such "possibly significant" roles appear in the list, and still requires a -worthy volume of |reliable sources to ''demonstrate'' the significance of the roles by actually saying something substantive, above and beyond just the cast list, ''about'' him and his performances. No sources, no article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG||WP:RS)