Deletion of Boy Scouts of America and sex abuse cases

Comment: or '''re-merge'''.  Seems to be a subarticle of two different articles; Boy Scouts of America and Scouting sex abuse cases.  ''Normally'', it would be a good thing to split out a common section; but this case is anything but normal.  It does seem to be a consequence of an attempt to include the list of ''all'' such cases in Wikipedia, making the section too large to be included in either parent article.  My suggestion would be to restore the ''original'' material back into whichever parent it was started from, and create a new article List of Boy Scouts of America sex abuse cases.  It shouldn't be precisely this one, but I'm not sure '''delete''' would really be appropriate.  '''Re-merge''' and '''Rename'''?   In any case, I don't think it's a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Scouting has 30 million kids in 161 different nations,  yet the Scouting_sex_abuse_cases page spends 10,000 characters (more than half of article) focused on just one single scouting organization out of thousands: the Boy Scouts of America.   Either we split that BSA-stuff off into a subarticle, per , or we risk sending the message that 50% of the world's scouting-related sex abuse is caused by just one organization, the BSA--  an implication that is patently false and is, to my eyes, the definition of UNDUE weight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: as a notable topic but Scouting_sex_abuse_cases#United_States should be reduced to a |summary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Summary style (WP:SUMMARY)