Deletion of Tyler Williams (soccer)

Comment: I agree with SF here. 200 mins of  isn't enough when GNG isn't met. In my own search, I found a couple of YouTube videos where he is interviewed and then some minor mentions on the NASL's own website, like http://www.nasl.com/news/2015/02/10/armada-fc-add-four-more-players-with-local-ties this, I have no doubt that SF already did a much more comprehensive  search than me. This article, in its current form, is just synthesised from the bare minimum stats coverage and there's no indication that it can be meaningfully expanded in any way from the sources available. I'll happily change my vote if significant coverage is brought to the discussion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: No |significant coverage about the subject so he fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)

Comment: despite passing  there does not appear to be any |significant coverage of the individual, and they appear to fail . Additionally, as the player appears retired from the sport, they are unlikely to re-attain that presumption of notability. Since GNG ostensibly takes precedence over NFOOTY, I think deletion is the more clear decision
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)