Deletion of Alaska Seaplane Service (2nd nomination)

Comment: A Google and Google News search gives only trivial mentions and/or unreliable sources (commercial sites, directory info, etc.). This fails  dramatically, scheduled carrier or no scheduled carrier
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Whilst the size of the aircraft do not affect notability, the fact that it lacks |significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Some of the people arguing to keep this seem to think that verifiability is the only criterion for inclusion that we have, but articles have to pass the |notability guidelines as well.  Notability is not inherited as being an verifiable airline, the topic still needs to have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" in order to be included.  Just because |others exist doesn't mean that we can't judge this article on its merits.  I can find trivial mentions of this airline and that's it, there isn't the in-depth discussion of the topic that's required for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:OSE)