Deletion of List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people/No longer identified (2nd nomination)

Comment: per the fact that this violates , specifically Presumption in favor of privacy. Unless these actors and actresses are notable for once being gay, they violate the "Is it notable, verifiable and important to the article? If not, leave it out." bit of . The standard for information is higher when dealing with Biographical information, and this list violates that due to the fact that the information is rarely, if ever relevant to the person's notability. The only actresses I can think of off-hand who've made issue of their sexual preferences are Rosie O'Donnell and Ellen Degeneres. Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: encyclopaedic article, clearly hot potato topic: care needed of course re .  Natural link to List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people.  I agree that title needs changing to something more suitable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Too many potential  issues here, plus it's very difficult to really verify what is truth and what is rumor, or whether certain individuals were ever actually gay to begin with (as noted above, TATU being a good example
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: I know I'm rowing against the tide here, but I feel I have to say something.  ALL biographical information is "prone to BLP issues," even the least contentious claims you could think of.  That alone is not a reason to delete, being 'prone' to problems violates no wikipedia policy.  IF this list satisfies  then there is no choice other to keep.  I agree it's a mess in current form, so I won't vote keep, but if it is deleted, I would please ask that it be done without prejudice so that a fully-sourced version comporting to BLP and verifiability guidelines would not be simply speedied out of existance.  This list is not POV, not OR and not unallowable so long as it relies on published information and reliable sources.  The fact that, as 23skidoo noted "...difficult to really verify what is truth..." is not a real problem, Wikipedia is not concerned with empirical truth, only what can be verified through reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: The |policy page states
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)