Deletion of Napoleon (game)

Comment: A classic game which has been published in multiple editions, this easily passes  and  – see the ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_Play_in_Today_s_Society/jLqXM3U_pzEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Napoleon%22+block+game&pg=PA413&printsec=frontcover Encyclopedia of Play in Today's Society'', for example.  See , , , , , &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BEFORE||WP:DRIVEBY||WP:NEXIST||WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Due to the presence of a delete !vote, it doesn't appear that this can be withdrawn -- see . {{replyto|Piotrus|p=}}, how do you feel about this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SKCRIT)

Comment: per comments above showing this game meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No opinion on whether this should be kept or not, but if it is kept then it needs to be moved to Napoleon (board game) (or similar), with Napoleon (game) redirecting to Napoleon (disambiguation)#Gaming as an |incomplete disambiguation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (WP:INCDAB)

Comment: BGG lists it in Top 150 for 'war' category (and Top 1,500 rank overall)... not super obscure, but not very well known. It got video reviews by a major board game channel: https://www.dicetower.com/game/1662/napoleon-the-waterloo-campaign-1815. There is a recent KS for a new edition but it didn't generate any news coverage, and I can't find any written reviews. There may be something not digitized in some wargame zines or such, but as things stand right now, this fails . Ping me if better sources are found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)