Deletion of Benito Martínez

Comment: Per a review of available sources, this subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The subject meets , with significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, as referenced in the article and with additional sources noted above. He received international coverage in sources independent of each other while he was alive, as well as after he died. There is no policy that meeting  because of the subject's old age excludes them from notability. Discussion here seems to have veered into the quality of the article, which is not the purpose of AfD. However, Wikipedia does have policy on citing uncertain dates MOS:APPROXDATE, as I have had cause to note in another AfD this week. Instead of a ? after the date of birth, the policy recommends placing (unattested) after the date. (I am not sure why this AfD was extended, as it appears to be a clear Keep, not just on votes but on policy-based arguments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:BASIC)

Comment: This topic passes  as it stands, with no less than 4 pieces of substantive coverage in |reliable sources.  The nominator makes no claim to have done any of the required  research to see if there is more coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The basic question is does the article meet asic and it does, with three reliable sources listed in the article, more listed above, not is the claim of the article's subject fraudulent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: This article fails , , and . The article is packed with longevity fancruft like his old nickname, age at first doctors visit, and his secret to longevity. He claimed to live 10 years longer then the oldest verified man ever and was an obvious fraudster. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, coverage, and content for a standalone article, and this doesn't measure up in any respect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOPAGE)