Deletion of Gérard Gertoux (3rd nomination)

Comment: His work has only a handful of citations, indicating limited impact.  He very much fails the average professor test for .  I didn't find reviews for , and I don't see other signs of notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Despite strenuous efforts at demonstrating otherwise, all of the claimed qualifications and cited sources are not indicative of an article subject that passes .  None of the eight criteria are satisfied by either the article or the discussion above.  Many of the claimed accomplishments are either meaningless (e.g., his books have been indexed in libraries) or very dubious (e.g., publishing a book through a publisher accused of "dealing in bulk"). A large portion of the article attempts to "borrow" notability through mentioning other academics but notability is  and the mentions by others are extremely disputable in legitimacy. The only route towards notability, therefore, is through the . The only independent, reliable sourcing that makes significant mention of Gertoux is in relation to a subject that the current article avoids entirely: his lack of qualification for a PhD and claims of religious discrimination.  Even that, however, founders on .  There is nothing worth salvaging through  so the only option left is Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMICS||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:ONEEVENT||WP:ATD)

Comment: I request that the closing admin be someone closely familiar with .  I'll also comment that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: No indication that ,  or any other applicable standard is met. Passing mentions, "secondary" sources published by iUniverse, and a grievance about not getting a doctorate do not a notability case make. (Also, the "G. Gertoux has presented conferences at different universities" is a frankly absurd exercise in trying to make the subject sound impressive for doing something that every academic does.) I would actually expect the Google Scholar citation counts to be low, as is often true in the humanities, but not ''this'' low; and there's nothing on JSTOR or anywhere else to suggest that his fringe ideas are even taken seriously enough to rebut
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)