Deletion of Seth Finkelstein (2nd)

Comment: The subject is notable enough for an article and the existing article seems consistent with .  I don't see any realistic way to incorporate the subject's desires to ''not'' have such an article into the process
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: I don't give a rat's ass about  -- there's no "delete because the subject is a control freak" clause within it that I'm aware of -- but the subject isn't all that notable to begin with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Easily passes  and  and it is sourced by reliable sources to boot.  I'm getting tired of editors arbitrarily applying their take on our standards to suit their opinion.  With these AfDs, our "policies" and "guidelines" are becoming meaningless
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: meets  and requesting deletion is not an encyclopedic reason to delete; if Oliver North or Bill Clinton or Charles Manson wanted their articles deleted or have the unfortunate material removed from them would any self-respecting encyclopedia comply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: the sourced data elsewhere as per . Keep the data. Lose the troll magnet
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)