Deletion of Tilman Hausherr (2nd nomination)

Comment: never heard of him" is not a good deletion reasoning.  I'm unsure how he meets  though as the provided sources mostly make trivial mention of Herr Hausherr
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I'm willing to give a pass on  for now because this nom makes no case for deletion and the last AfD was a consensus keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Just because you haven't heard of someone does not mean they are not notable. He meets  and he is considered one of the strong critics of Scientology. His article is linked in various other articles, as well. Apparently, from reading the first AfD, he is a very influential anti-Scientology figure in Germany
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Sorry, that is not the way it works.  We don't do ''comparative notability'' at Wikipedia.  We have policies and guidelines and each is applied to articles individually.  Besides, last time I checked being on "daytime talk TV" wasn't much of a case for meeting 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)