Deletion of Dave Weasel (3rd nomination)

Comment: to I'm 30. There's very little coverage on Weasel, certainly not enough to pass . If he were a business person known for working at only one notable company, the consensus would be to include his info in that company article.  In this case the album has almost no coverage either, but did hit #1 on the Billboard Comedy chart.  Also interesting that he did a fake article for his fake paper, which apparently went quite viral, but here's still no corresponding profile coverage of him or the paper. I found this archive btw - which must be the deleted article, and also has limited sources. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Dave_Weasel.html#cite_note-Dave_Weasel_iTunes-25 Since  also comes to mind, this is better off as an album article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: but flag for improvement. Topping the comedy albums chart on ''Billboard'' certainly ''is'' a credible notability claim for a comedian — strafing the bottom edges of the chart for a week or two probably wouldn't be, but reaching #1 certainly demonstrates a significant following — but the article does still need to be referenced better than it is right now, to more evidence of |reliable source coverage ''about'' him, supporting more content than just stating that "he exists, the end", before it can be considered a ''good'' article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)