Deletion of Andrew Chrucky

Comment: The most likely claim of notability for him would be under  #1: if we could say that he was the leading expert on Wilfrid Sellars, maybe that would be enough? But I don't think he is. Google scholar http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=intitle%3A%22Wilfrid+Sellars%22+-author%3Asellars finds multiple other researchers, writing directly about Sellars, with greater impact. Chrucky comes in at #12 in the list. I'm not sure how seriously to take the citation numbers from Google scholar; they're far too low to consider as evidence for passing , but it may just be that Google scholar doesn't cover this area well. On the other hand the ordering of these authors by impact, given by Google scholar, seriously undermines any claim for notability for Chrucky: he doesn't even make the top 10 of scholars on a very narrow subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)