Deletion of Catherine Pinhas

Comment: Per . The ''context'' of the sources are essential to note and analyze before hastily coming to a decision. Had it not been for her notable husband, Catherine would not be mentioned in ''any'' sources. Her marriage certainly is not akin to being a First Lady, and I agree with Tony: we should be on the side of ''not'' invading an unnotable living person's privacy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: NOTINHERITED means that spouses of notable people have to earn their notability through  rather than being notable by association even when there is no in-depth coverage. It does not, however, mean there is any presumption of non-notability for them when the sources exist, and it does not make sources tainted by being "derived from" their association. In this case, if the only sources were like the Star and Huffpo links from Oakshade, or http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/10/10/appelez-moi-catherine this one from the Journal de Montreal (in French) – profiles of her as a politician's wife – then she'd still pass  (we have multiple major stories about her) but fail . However in the case of Pinhas we also have sources about her in a different context, her work with refugees: The Globe & Mail link from Oakshade, and http://journalmetro.com/actualites/national/855812/lepouse-de-mulcair-interpellee-par-les-refugies/ this one from Métro (also in French). So she passes both GNG and BIO1E
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: WP:NOTINHERITED states that while ''"The fact of having a famous relative is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article. Individuals in close, personal relationships with famous people (including politicians) can have an independent article even if they are known solely for such a relationship, but only if they pass ."'' And the fact is that Pinhas has the kind of profiles in major media that carry bios past .  (Even spouses of no public or notable accomplishment whatsoever like Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio and Todd Palin
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the earlier votes have enough coverage to meet .  Just because the motivation for those articles may be her relation to a leader, that's not a reason to ignore them.  There is clearly sufficient information about her to write a verifiable article about her.  The coverage is far better than anything on Savita Kovind, for example.  The presumption of notability for "first ladies" and no other political spouses should not be interpreted as an iron-clad rule
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)