Deletion of Mitchel Lasser

Comment: Not one, but two named professorships, is a clear double pass of #C5, not even discussed in the nomination. And it's not number of publications you should be looking at, nor (for this area) citation counts, but rather book reviews, and he has enough of those for his three monographs ''Judicial Deliberations'', ''Judicial Transformations'', and ''Judicial Dis-Appointments'' (plus an entire book by others devoted to the first of them) to pass . Speedy because of the completely inadequate evaluation evident in the nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: named professorships at Ivy League schools are clearly sufficient under #C5. In addition, I'm also seeing coverage in independent scholarly books: see http://google.com/books/edition/Comparative_Matters/34kdBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PT271&printsec=frontcover and http://google.com/books/edition/Comparative_Reasoning_in_European_Suprem/oXkxAAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&&pg=PA231&printsec=frontcover. This would suggest that he passes the GNG as well. I'm not sure this nomination meets the |speedy-keep criteria, but it's pretty clear to me that this article should not be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CSK)