Deletion of Cameron Caldwell (politician)

Comment: without prejudice against restoration after a |deletion review of either the older article or this one per ''sometimes Wikipedia needs to |be a bureaucracy and follow protocols.''  I was going to say "keep" per Eastmain, and I would probably go for "restore" in a DRV for the same reasoning, but this AFD is not the forum to overturn the previous deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV||WP:BURO)

Comment: fails  in my view. If you remove the totally unsourced biographical stuff (most of it) you're left with ''"he ran for office, then he didn't because of a scandal"''. That's not really the purpose of Wikipedia and what other purpose does this serve? Beyond the one-off scandal, what else is the subject notable for
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per nom and Stalwart111: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as per March 2012 AfD decision. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:POLITICIAN||:WP:BASIC)