Deletion of Poison (Beyoncé Knowles song)

Comment: or '''redirect''' to parent album. Aside from the usual personnel info from the album booklet and various comments compiled from reviews of ''Sasha Fierce'', this article appears to contain no other information about the song other its than inclusion on a (non-notable) DatPiff mixtape, two sentences about composition, and a placement on a relatively minor Korean international downloads chart. A third of the sources used in the article are from album booklets and listings of the album on digital retailers (in fact, a majority of the background section is duplication of the personnel section in prose form). It should be noted that just because a song may pass a criterion of  or  does ''not'' automatically make it notable. Having taken a look at the article's content, I don't think the song has enough stand-alone information to warrant an entire article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:GNG)

Comment: the  criteria have just changed—an RFC on the change was closed today after being open for well over two months, and the new wording is in place. The Poison article, to my mind, is even more clearly non-notable under the revised guidelines, and some of the arguments made above are no longer applicable as they relied on the old wording
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: to the album (redirect per Nyttend). I really don't see enough convincing independent "Poison"-only sources to make this notable on its own, and charting is inherently dubious when dealing with South Korea and their unusual system. Notability is not guaranteed by meeting one or more of the "may be notable" criteria listed in , it just means it might be possible; Aaron's interpretation that two criteria means it's automatically notable is simply wrong. I'm also not convinced this meets . (Incidentally, a GA nomination is not a get-out-of-jail-free card; articles should be notable, and a number of GA-nominated articles have proven not to be in the past.) Additionally, I think it's a serious matter that the article's Charts section is seriously flawed: its assumption that source 15 covers January through April looks wrong to me, when a clear look at what would be February (2.2010) would make it clear that it isn't February at all, since there's no way that any single would sell over 337 million copies (the country has only 50 million people), much less in 28 days. And since "Poison" was released in February and supposedly made number 1 for at least one week—I can't get that chart data to display on my screen when I access source 14, and don't see the name "Beyonce" anywhere, much less "Poison", so I'm AGFing on this one, though I think a 2011 access date in the ref for a 2013 article is odd—it would almost certainly have sold better in that month than any other
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:GNG)