Deletion of Christopher Ashlee

Comment: per lack of notability as ably argued by Bali U et al.  is fatally flawed, and every article that is deleted despite citing it, is one more argument for fixing it (eventually
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: It is worth looking up a bit from  on the same guideline page, where it says, "meeting one or more of the additional notability criteria does not guarantee that a subject should be included." This is a case where a subject barely squeaks past one supplementary criterion, but is otherwise lacking for anything reliably sourced to say about him, and because of that there is no sound basis for an article. I also have to agree with others that the idea that getting 1/9th of an award from a minor local advertising coatrack establishes notability is a sign of deficiency in the notability guideline. The language that suggests notability is established by any award from the 31 ceremonies listed in :Category:Pornographic film awards (plus any of the non-porn awards in :Category:Film awards), is grossly over-generous compared to similar guidelines for other types of performers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: per Ash. He co-won a Grabby Award and passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: The Grabby awards have been used to satisfy  in many other gay porn performer BLPs without much argument. The sticking point here appears to be that the winner of this award has been identified as "entire cast on Dylan Sanders" rather than listing each member of the cast. I've suggested elsewhere that there needs to be a discussion of which awards should be considered acceptable for . This AfD probably isn't the right place to do it, but it would forestall these kinds of debates, so would someone with a better knowledge of specific awards care to start it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)