Deletion of Yoast SEO

Comment: per , , , and . This just released its software ''two weeks ago''. As I've written in another AFD, literally any Internet rando can get "certificated" in SEO on LinkedIn. The sourcing is terrible - social media, blogs, and its own website. I would go along with userfication, if someone wants to adopt this page
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:MILL||WP:NCORP||WP:RS)

Comment: Per , anything promotional sould be removed. However, with the sources indicated in this AfD, the article is good enough to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Having said what I've said in my earlier comments, I'll register the lone keep vote, even if just for the record. The plugin (not the company behind it, necessarily — and yes, I do think the article should very clearly be about the product and not the company) is notable, outwith the Wikipedia meaning of the word at least, and IMO it would be a pity to delete this article just because we can't establish  notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Looking through the books, it seems easy to find coverage such as "''Yoast SEO is the granddaddy of all SEO plugins. With nearly 21 million downloads, it's easily the most widely used SEO plugin. We've discussed it throughout this book.''";"''One of the best is WordPress SEO by Yoast''"; "''This particular plugin is designed by WordPress SEO consultant/designer Joost de Valk (whose first name is pronounced “Yoast”). ''"; "''If you're using Wordpress, we highly recommend the free Wordpress SEO plugin by Yoast.''".  Just needs improvement not deletion per ; ;; &c
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:NEXIST||WP:IGNORINGATD)

Comment: There's unanimity that the article doesn't meet , even from the lone opposition !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The topic is the wordpress plug-in, not the company. The last AfD determined that the company failed to meet the criteria, hence the article was refocussed to the software. There are sufficient references that meet the criteria for establishing the notability of the product, meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)