Deletion of Silverleaf Resorts

Comment: First, notwithstanding the above claim that "article also has been edited repeatedly to conform to WP standards and practices -- under the guidance of several notable WP editors (article history will show efforts made to comply with and address all objections in good faith, to ultimate satisfaction of objectors)", there is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Silverleaf_Resorts&action=edit&redlink=1 no talk page supporting this. Second, the person objecting is the creator and, for practical purposes, only active editor of the article (and otherwise largely involved with other Cerberus and related articles...). This is definitely in violation of . As for the article, it does read my in part. And it is certainly not |balanced. The awards are from an affiliation organization of which the article's topic is a business partner (http://www.pissedconsumer.com/reviews-by-company/silverleaf-resorts/silverleaf-resort-rci-exchange-20080714127365.html see also this). I.e., more . The subject may yet get notoriety with accusations such as http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/silverleaf-resorts/south-lee-massachusetts-01260/horrible-experience-at-silverleaf-resorts-scam-south-lee-massachusetts-459947 this, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ngb2ngovluc this and http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g60956-i76-k1441318-Silverleaf_Scam-San_Antonio_Texas.html this - in time. Nothing else noteworthy on G or GN. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SPAM||WP:NPV||WP:COI||WP:COMPANY)