Deletion of Wesley Charles Jacobs Jr.

Comment: I'd say a MacArthur Fellows Program|MacArthur Fellow at least comes close to , but not totally sure
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: He is a MacArthur Fellow therefore meets notability criteria 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: No evidence of "significant coverage" in .  is only intended to show who is ''likely'' to be notable and creates a rebuttable presumption (see ) but does not itself guarantee it. The lack of any "significant coverage" in  indicates that it isn't met
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:ANYBIO||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:RS)

Comment: It's like I'm living in the twilight zone or something. Everyone understands that you can start with these other guidelines but if they do not meet the requirements then you move on up the chain all the way to  which rules them all. The supreme notability guideline supersedes ALL others. Please check it against that guideline before you nominate for deletion. A) Is it sourced? B) Is the source independent, which means not owned or affiliated with the subject? C) Is it a reputable, reliable and verifiable source? D) Does the source significantly cover the subject of the potential/existing article? E) Are the sources accessible by a large group of people (national/international)? If you can answer those questions with a yes then the subject meets Wikipedia's supreme guideline for notability and deserves an article if you want to write one. It's not intended to be subjective like many other guidelines and essays. Quite literal and should be taken as such
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)