Deletion of Imagery of nude celebrities

Comment: Sure, there may be some merit to the topic, and whilst  is a valid concern, what we have here is pure OR, with some hideously unreliable sources, used solely to promote said sources. Nuke it, start again. And, to the "not cleanup" comments: the tags have been there for SIX years, and haven't been sorted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: per -Cyclopia. The topic satisfies  and is sufficiently removed from the possible redirect/merger targets for those actions to make little sense. That said, it needs monitoring to remove occasional BLP vios and to keep out "examples" and spam links. Available RS can be used to fix problems with unsourced OR. Also, I note past instances of removal of references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:NOTCLEANUP|AfD is not cleanup, as clear in our |deletion policy, and ''all'' the concerns above are related to content, not to the topic. I removed BLP violations in the last paragraph. The topic is notable: there is a a http://books.google.de/books?id=wCaLMAEACAAJ&dq=nude+celebrities&hl=it&sa=X&ei=8BG7UY3YIqWl4ASfvoCwAg&redir_esc=y book on the subject, a http://books.google.de/books?id=QbCNJZZrj24C&pg=PA125&dq=naked+celebrities&hl=it&sa=X&ei=OhK7UbXzIsjn4QSR6oGYBg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=naked%20celebrities&f=false book paragraph here (which in turn makes reference to other works on the topic), http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/entspl15&div=26&id=&page= this looks like a paper on the topic, and http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-003-1003-9#page-1 this is another paper that discusses the topic in some depth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)