Deletion of 2017 Australian constitutional crisis

Comment: at least for now.  This will only be "important" if the High Court actually shows any of these politicians the door, which is far from certain.  Saying that this will have a lasting impact (let alone the absurd hyperbole of calling it a "constitutional crisis") is pure  stuff.  If this brings down the government or causes wider effects then we can come back to it with cooler heads.  More generally, this was created as a  of the section 44 article, and covers a lot of the same ground but in a much less satisfactory method
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: per nom and per . Few sources call the current situation a 'constitutional crisis', and it manifestly is not one: the legal processes needed to resolve these cases are working fine. This can be covered well in the article on the relevant article of the constitution as noted in the nomination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: topic is undoubtedly notable and meets  with numerous |sources available, problems with title is a side issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)