Deletion of Arif Ahmed (philosopher)

Comment: I see 4 reviews of 2 authored books, and additional reviews for edited volumes.  That's marginal for .  Support from progress towards  C1 helps tip towards keep.  I don't see evidence that he's created an entire discipline, but that's not required for notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)

Comment: per . I just added six reviews of three books to the article. Weak because two of them are edited volumes rather than monographs. The case for #C1 is also borderline but Cambridge doesn't hire people, even as readers, without a basis
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: per . I see no reason to keep this article; a search of Ahmed brings up this one event and the fact that he's a member of the Cambridge faculty. He also appears to not meet N:ACADEMIC
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: for passing rof#C1: GS cites just acceptable for low cited field of philosophy. Most of his publications are single-author
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: look at {{ping|Xxanthippe}}'s rof#C1: "1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." Ahmed is what you might call an Applied Philosopher. He has in one stroke '''created an entirely new discipline'''. Ye ordinary armchair philosopher on this forum might disagree. And that's to be expected
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)