Deletion of Derwick Associates (2nd nomination)

Comment: There are problems with tone throughout the article, and I think there is a bit of  weight on the scandals and shenanigans - mainly because there isn't much detail about other activities, such as the Caracas project. But that's an issue to be fixed by cleaning up the article - and AFD is not for cleanup. Quote all the policies you want, but it's clear to me that this company is important enough to have been |noted by multiple |reliable sources - and thus is notable by our rules
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:N||WP:RS)