Deletion of DeploraBall

Comment: Per . This is an article about a party with absolutely no lasting historical significance or relevance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Recentism (but probably not in violation of ); first two rationales in this discussion are extremely weak and the one by the IP is completely irrelevant. Likely not to provoke lasting news coverage in future, if any or maintain enduring notability, in any case. I'd note that I might be inclined to believe that Koblenz summit deserves an article by similar standards, though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: to Inauguration of Donald Trump. This is a pretty glaring case of WP:RECENTISM and it clearly fails . We need to put the brakes on the wave of new articles related to Donald Trump. Far too much of this stuff does not warrant stand alone articles. Seriously. There was a party and it got some news coverage. Big deal. On the other side of the coin, just how many articles do we need dealing with the various anti-Trump protests that have been going on
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT)