Deletion of Chuck Easttom

Comment: I absolutely hate this kind of self-promotional puffery. Unfortunately, seems to meet  #4 as shown by Dori. I have done some cleanup in the article, but more is needed, especially references to his books and to the fact that they are being used as course materials. Some more cutting and slashing may be needed, too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: I went through this article thoroughly and marked where citations were needed.  There's opinions that aren't cited and the citations are not reliable according to .  Regardless of my opinion that it's an autobiography, it's in no way ready or suitable for Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: yeah, another) - As policy, iographies of living persons/Help#What you can expect says (under point #2
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B)

Comment: the article being an autobiography is immaterial, although it can result in  issues.  The important point here is the subject doesn't fulfill Wikipedia's requirements for |notability as |verified in |reliable sources. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: I also think he meets  criterion #4 (significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions). In addition to the evidence provided by Dori, he also has several widely held books according to WorldCat. He has at least one book, ''Learn VB.net'', currently in more than 900 libraries worldwide
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)