Deletion of Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat

Comment: as the film HAS been critically reviewed and received more-than-trivial coverage in independent secondary sources such as Dread Centralhttp://www.dreadcentral.com/reviews/bloodfeast-2-all-u-can-eat-uk-dvd  Io9http://io9.com/blood-feast-2%7C-all-u-can-eat/ DVD Talkhttp://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/7260/blood-feast-2-all-u-can-eat-2-disc/ and Film Threathttp://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/3191/ and IS verifiable in such as The New York Times http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/284128/Blood-Feast-2-All-U-Can-Eat/overview as well as several http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Blood%20Feast%202%3A%20All%20U%20Can%20Eat%22%20-wikipedia&num=50&hl=en&prmd=ivns&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp books  Agree with merge of "You can eat" to proper title of "U can eat", as the later '''is''' the one searchable as having the commentary and review to meet both  and  and has enough coverage to support individual notability for an article seperate from its prequel
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NF)