Deletion of John Larney

Comment: per . No indication that notability will be established by presenting added references for already-documented and relatively insignificant accomplishments. I encourage my fellow Boy Scouts to Wikipedia:Introduction 2|learn more about editing Wikipedia rather than waste time politicking here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Have a look at  for the criteria a band should meet to have a Wikipedia page. We delete probably hundreds of band "vanity" pages a month. No agreement has been reached on what the notability criteria are for modern-day biographies, so those are often decided on a more case-by-case basis. Now, personally, I don't think Mr. Larney is notable enough to merit a page in our encyclopedia. That's not an insult - I am not notable enough either, and neither is anybody I know. Others may disagree about notability here (there are some who think notability isn't a criteria at all), and Wikipedia:Verifiability can be a useful tool in deciding cases like this as well. Are there any independent sources we can find, on the web or in a public library, to verify the claims made in a page? It's not enough that facts are true, they must be verifiable. See also Wikipedia:No Original Research - personal knowledge is never an acceptable source for Wikipedia. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: My delete vote stands unless if some |verifiable sources are provided for this infomation. The only source listed is "A History of Tisquantum Lodge," no ISBN number. I can find no mention of such a book on the internet, and I doubt my local library has it: this is not a valid source for an article. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)