Deletion of Reggie Shuford

Comment: And similarly for another Philadelphia lawyer, Judith Chomsky, the unattributed reference from the Asha Centre would be discounted, and the reference from ''Philadelphia Weekly'' would be discounted as a local source?I anticipate a pointer to , so I ask you to read
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: Shuford appears to have significant coverage in numerous independent reliable sources, and unless I'm reading it wrong, that automatically qualifies him under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I think that Shuford's legal writings, which have recieved significant citations, combined with his activism, which recieve significant press coverage, are sufficient to overcome 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Found significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources, including the ''Philadelphia Enquirer'', a regional newspaper which, according to its Wiki article, has received nearly 2 dozen Pulitzer Prizes. ''Philly'' magazine, which is now a ref in the article, published a Q&A profile. The subject also received a Harvard Law School award as well as a second award from academia. Clearly passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)