Deletion of Yakub Abahanov

Comment: the number of edits on a talk page does not address the reason I nominated this article for deletion and is not a basis for "significant coverage" or anything else.  Opinions stating "I think this man is notable" do not mean that there are independent secondary sources which focus on this individual; these opinions (less justification for these opinions) are simply examples of .  It boils down to the fact that there are no independent secondary sources out there (and I've spent time trying to find one, let alone significant coverage) in which this individual is the subject of the article.  The sources referenced in the article DO NOT focus on this individual (except for the military documents, which are not independent, secondary sources); if he is mentioned at all in the sources given, his name simply appears on a list.  This clearly doesn't meet the basic requirements for  nor the basic criteria for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:BLP||WP:BIO)

Comment: Plain and simple - doesn't meet the notability standards of . For a person to be notable s/he must recieve significant coverage in independant and/or secondary sources. This person hasn't recieved coverage in independant and/or secondary coverage. ''A fortiori'', he hasn't recieved significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: we have articles on Erich Kempka|Hitler's chauffeur, Heinz Linge|Hitler's valet, Erna Flegel|Hitler's nurse, Johannes Hentschel|Hitler's electrician, Werner Haase|Hitler's doctor, Hans Baur|Hitler's pilot, Rochus Misch|Hitler's bodyguard, Ludwig Stumpfegger|Hitler's medical aide, Else Krüger|Hitler's secretary and Constanze Manziarly|Hitler's chef. We have over 1000 articles on Quarterbackers in the NFL, we have every single Pokemon character...and you're arguing that an alleged terrorist "isn't notable enough" to merit a neutral article collecting the details about them? The article may have  issues, but it certainly deserves to ''exist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)