Deletion of World of Books Ltd (2nd nomination)

Comment: as per nomination.  This article was created from a |single-purpose account, suggesting a conflict of interest and a reason for the article being commercial in nature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: while this did qualify for a speedy keep as nominating an article two days after an closed AFD without a |deletion review) is highly discouraged, and considered disruptive. I decided to look closely at the sources before deciding. The first source is most likely a press release, as there was no author named in the article and researching further the Trade Month articles come from the UK Trade & Investment website, which is a government website that helps UK buinesses expand and grow. So that source is not independent of the subject. The second and third sources are clear press releases from press release websites, not independent neither. The fourth release can be considered "independent" from the subject but it's a local newspaper award, which isn't a claim of |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV||WP:N)

Comment: can't find significant coverage to indicate this company meets  or . As for the quick re-nom, I don't think that it was ideal, however it still does not change the situation with regard to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:GNG)