Deletion of Clara Meadmore

Comment: WP:NOT a tabloid. Also this is sort of : the event being that the press has discovered a salacious fact (105year old virgin) and parrot each other for a few days (which of course leads to multiple publication, but not necessarily what one would call multiple reliable sources). If we think the fact is encyclopedic it can be included elsewhere (perhaps illustrating something about the history of sexual mores, or about media treatment of them), but there's no reason to have a ''bio'' article on someone known for a single piece of trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)