Deletion of Charles Veley (2nd nomination)

Comment: With the sole nomination criterion being ONEEVENT, I advocate Keep.  There are numerous sources that satisfy the GNG https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Charles+Veley%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1.  From nothing more than clicking the "news" button listed on this AfD, I see articles in the ''New York Times'', ''Forbes'', the ''Toronto Star'' and the ''Telegraph'' -- all of them major news sources, all of them discussing the subject in significant detail.  This provokes serious doubt that the nom bothered with even the most cursory of searches for sources, as  enjoins one to do before filing an AfD.  That being said, ONEEVENT pretty much means "one event," and the fellow's notability doesn't stem from a single incident; it's from what he's done over the course of many years.  You could, with as much accuracy and as much fidelity to the guideline, claim that a professional hockey player of long standing has no notability beyond sports
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: based on above identified sources. Basically a lack of , as the same nominator admitted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)