Deletion of Speechless (Lady Gaga song)

Comment: as it passes : has charted, and has significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: as per Hunter Kahn's rationale, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The key to the portion of  the nominator cites is "are ''probably'' notable". In other words, just because it doesn't fit any of those criteria doesn't ''necessarily'' mean it doesn't warrant an article. The very next sentence in  after that one is, "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Obviously, in this case, there is plenty of verifiable material to warrant an entry, and the article is already reasonably detailed.  also points out that the song must meet basic |notability guidelines and coverage in |reliable sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject. This article also meets those standards: significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS||WP:N||WP:RELIABLE)

Comment: due to a failure of , which says "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable". This song does not pass any of this criteria. The vast majority of the sources here do not refer to the song in its own right, but are retracted from reviews of The Fame Monster album, leaving the song as notable as any other song on the album and not deserving of its own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONGS)

Comment: Another recent Lady Gaga AfD nom, Christmas Tree (Lady Gaga song), survived despite the most significant "coverage" being an About.com posting that pretty much consists solely of an image. I realize that the song charted, but charted songs are only "probably notable", not "definitely notable" enough to warrant an article, especially if there's virtually zero coverage. My point is not to violate , but just to point out that by comparison, "Speechless" has a wealth of information about it, particularly citation 4, which is entirely about the song. Granted, the majority of the other references provide just passing mentions (not even 1 sentence in some instances; as many as 3 sentences in a few instances). My bottom line is, as  states, "a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." Indeed, I would consider this article to be reasonably detailed, and so I'm in favor of keeping this. As for those songs on ''Thriller'' that don't have articles...if enough information exists, I'm all for their creation, as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP||WP:NSONGS)

Comment: passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: This article and the songs are not notable, they are notable just for Gaga's fans (above), who, in fact, created this article only cause they "love Lady Gaga". All this guys are saying that is notable enough, but, not even in Google is notable, is just notable for Gaga's people, sorry, but it has to be deleted. BTW, a lot of the guys here, that try to keep the article are forgetting about , so, it doesn't matter if "If every Pink Floyd song can get an article" like someone said before, not every song has to have an article about it, no matter if some of those articles say "X released Y as their 2nd single from the album Z", we don't need any more crap. Sorry, got to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAP)

Comment: If ''every'' Pink Floyd song can get an article, then "Speechless" deserves one too. It surely meets the |general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: passes  as  it has received widespread media coverage throughout the world
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)