Deletion of James W. Morgan

Comment: Birmingham isn't the largest city nor is it the smallest. This isn't a keep vote on  grounds but I would suspect there should be at least some sources about him, and probably enough to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: if somebody can actually show some solid sources before closure, '''delete''' otherwise. Birmingham is certainly a large enough city that a substantive and properly sourced article about a mayor ''would'' be deemed to pass  #2, but the role is not so "inherently" notable that we would need to keep a short |primary sourced stub which states ''only'' that the person ''existed'', the end. And while it is true that it's entirely possible to write a bad, seemingly deletable article about a person who actually passes our notability criteria, the saving play in a case like that is not simply ''presuming'' that better sources ''probably'' exist, but ''showing'' hard proof that better sources ''do'' exist (and I can't be the angel of salvation here, as I only have access to ''Canadian'' sourcing in his era, not the American kind where he might actually have some coverage.) So this needs to go if it doesn't see improvement, and then can certainly be recreated again in the future if somebody actually puts in the effort to write and source something better than this — but as it stands, nothing about him is so "inherently" notable that it would be necessary to keep it in ''this'' form
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES)

Comment: he's covered in books and scholarly sources on the Civil Rights Era, and his role in the Birmingham Botanical Garden and Birmingham Zoo can be sourced.  Article needs improvement, but 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP)