Deletion of Nishat Nawar Salwa

Comment: The deletion rational is unconvincing. This article has 19 sources. To show the  notability guidelines are not met, one would have to argue the sources are trivial or unreliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: First of all, {{u|Johnpacklambert}}, that's a little too harsh of a thing to say about a . Let's remember the article subjects are innocent victims of our deletion discussions, they don't deserve to be trashed. Coming in second place in one pageant doesn't make a person a "failed beauty queen", anyway. But I agree with JPL here (as I often do) that the article should be deleted. The keep !votes above are highly unconvincing. The number of sources doesn't matter. That she is an actress, even a popular or famous one, also doesn't matter. "Cult following" isn't automatic notability, either. Many of the keep !votes have very low edit counts and perhaps do not fully understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which I hope the closer pays attention to. The article is ed, but going through the sources, including the foreign-language ones with Google Translate, I see not one single source that would count as |significant coverage sufficient to meet . They all seem to be passing mentions. Unless someone can demonstrate  examples of sources that would meet BASIC, this article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:REFBOMB||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BASIC||WP:THREE)