Deletion of White Ensign F.C. (2nd nomination)

Comment: I ran a bit quick yesterday, as I really don't like speedy deletions, {{reply|Insertcleverphrasehere}} I believe articles with any citations available and that have had a long period before being recreated should be given a fair trial and shouldn't ever be speedy deleted. Anyway, from looking at previous AfD and thefa.com website they registered two years ago to play in the FA Vase for the first time in the clubs existence, but they failed FA ground rules policy by having no lights. I am surprised there is no local news source for this on the article. If that issue with their ground has been fixed and the fact they gained promotion they will most likely have to register this coming season, this gives them a chance to enter FA Vase or FA Cup again. If we are going by the criteria that they need to play in an FA sanctioned cup competition to pass then they currently still fail Wikipedia guidelines to have an article. That could change by August know, but that's playing 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Meets  by being at the right level. Didn't before, does now
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: Fails  with a lack of multiple sources of significant coverage from independent sources.  All I could find are stats listings or personal blogs. Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Teams defers to GNG for sports team notability. As for the cited  that step 6 clubs are notable, that was just formally added to the WikiProject essay on 2 June.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Notability&diff=848563905&oldid=821294590
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LOCALCONSENSUS)