Deletion of Deaths in Harry Potter

Comment: It is appropriate to break a list out when it becomes so long as to be disproportionate to the rest of the article (says ).  The list at HP7 reached that length
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: this is |not encyclopedia material, |original research, |unsourced (outside the fiction itself) and, ultimately, |not notable.  &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:NN)

Comment: as an #INFO|indiscriminate collection of information with no real-world impact, and take it to a Harry Potter Wiki if you want. There's no sense in having "List of event in Harry Potter". Some of the entries are just bad: "12 Muggles" in the third book. The last book's deaths were notable because everyone was wondering who dies- we can mention that people were wondering who would die and talked about who ''did'' die. We don't need an article documenting every death in the series
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per #INFO.  Seems like terribly trivial information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per #INFO,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:TRIVIA||WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: as 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: In no way does the profusion of HP-related sub-articles meet . This accumulation of trivia is damaging to the reputation of the encyclopedia as a whole
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICT)