Deletion of Corey Worthington (2nd nomination)

Comment: If our notability guidelines lead to this article being kept, it merely shows that there is something wrong with those guidelines. By no criteria is this guy encyclopedic. So  and '''delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: for all the same reasons, mainly , #NEWS and for what it's worth, IMO the DRV should never have been closed as overturn in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOT)

Comment: per ,  (he is not notable and in the cold light of day will have been forgotten in 6 months, we really shouldn't be reporting on named minors for posterity in circumstances such as these, and the only reason much of this media coverage exists is self-promotion for the tabloids concerned, let's not forget it was a quiet news period with everyone still recovering from the election and it being mid-non-ratings period on TV, and it certainly wouldn't hold up to peer-reviewed or any other reference standard.) Also agree with many other points made by Delete voters
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Perfect example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . He's done absolutely nothing other than throw a party which got out of hand, and then get plastered on the Interwebs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Like I've said before, this is the ''definitive'' example of .  Should he truly develop genuine notability someday in the future, there's no reaason the article can't be undeleted at that time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: as per . The fact this little upstart got his mug in the papers says more about tabloid news desperation than it does about him. Half the articles discussing him even dwell on this fact! As of right now, he has been involved in ONE event that briefly touched public conciousness, and it was not even of his own making
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per . Patently non-notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: The question of  no longer applies since his fame (such as it is) has outlasted the specific event in question, and, moreover, he has parlayed it into a minor entertainment career by his own choice. The article meets our core content policies, especially , as it has numerous |reliable sources. Deletion hasn't even been requested by the subject, as far as I can tell. I see no valid reason to remove this article and I think it meets all the requirements of Wikipedia policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: per . This guy is still only known for doing one thing. He's trying, with some success, to extend his 15 minutes of fame by cashing in on this, but he hasn't really done anything newsworthy since
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per .  Multiple sources has never been the issue, the issue has been that the subject of the article is a stupid kid who made the news once, only to fade away once his fifteen minutes were up.  A couple of trivial local mentions of his desperate attempts to prolong those fifteen minutes don't change the fact that he's only notable for one relatively minor event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: for reasons I already stated at rticles for deletion/Corey Worthington|AfD:Corey Worthington and the Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_February_4#Corey_Worthington_.28closed.29|deletion review
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)