Deletion of Fatma Chamakh-Haddad

Comment: meets  as noted above, from preamble of Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Additional criteria|peeps Additional criteria - "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The sources already in the article include at least three works directly about her, and another with in-depth coverage of her (I can't tell about the remaining reference, as it is unlinked and doesn't have her name on the title, but my guess is that it is also non-trivial, based on how much it is used as a source in the article). This shows a clear pass of . I don't think the low citation counts on Google Scholar are a concern, given that (1) we can use a different notability criterion, GNG, (2) citation counts in the humanities are often low; they are not a good way to measure impact in the humanities; (3) she wrote in French, several decades ago, and both of those factors are also likely to make her representation in databases of online English-language literature more sparse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: meets  per sources already in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)