Deletion of Gameplay of StarCraft (2nd nomination)

Comment: First of all, the same "We can clean this up" argument was made last year when the first AfD was done, and it hasn't been. Secondly, is this Wikipedia or GameFAQs? The article reads as a manual/strategy guide, both which do |not belong here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: definite game-guide and  material
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Wikipedia is not for game guides. |It's useful is not a valid reason to keep the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: While I appreciate the hard work that the authors have obviously made to create this article, it fails . As has been mentioned above, Wikipedia is not GameFAQs and should not be treated as such. The article is unsourced and has remained that way for quite a long time and as such makes me suspect original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)