Deletion of David Jay Brown

Comment: The extent of his publication record makes me think that he's passing  #1.  I'm not wholly sure of that, but it looks that way.  Note that the current form of the article follows WP:NPOV quite well; the only reason that we discourage conflicts of interest is that they can lead to non-neutral content, and that result has not happened here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFESSOR)

Comment: The article is the very height of meaningless vapid ego, of abuses surrounding , or abuses surrounding , written by the self-promoting subject himself http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/DavidJayBrown and his good obliging pal http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Rosencomet who is financially connected to various projects involving David Jay Brown.  The sourcing itself is an ugly testament to self-advancement, self-promotion, and self-love, as David Jay Brown constitutes nearly every single source himself--David Jay Brown and his friend using David Jay Brown himself as a source for an article about David Jay Brown himself.  Incredible.  It's as though, in their minds, there is no universe at all outside of the mind of David Jay Brown.  Off-wiki you'll find a very few non-primary sources, mostly bloggy onanism focusing on , most of it the purest spam posing giddily and ludicrously as objectivity.  Spectacularly fails , , , , , , and any other policy you care to name.  Earlier versions of the article were even worse--if such a thing is possible--praising Brown as a modern-day messiah who combined all of the powers of Jesus and Freud and Einstein and Marx and, oh why the heck not, Timothy Leary, lol.  For years now, anyone daring to touch this article has been roundly abused in the most aggressive and personal ways imaginable, in one of the most egregious cases of  that we have ever seen.  Now this tyranny must end, and this article must go.  This is not the first time a self-appointed spiritual savior has promoted himself on Wikipedia, nor the first time we've been abused by the followers of such a person.  What never ceases to stagger me is how much personal abuse is hurled by these people who insist that they are so very, very spiritual.  Now if only he were notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO||WP:COI||WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:BK||WP:CREATIVE||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:OWN)