Deletion of GNS Theory

Comment: per nom, the critical attention Dhartung found is pretty minimal, and I can't quite figure out what, http://knutepunkt.laiv.org/ Dissecting larp is, oh wait! there's a wikipedia article on it, sort of at Knutepunkt about "A live role playing avant-garde movement".  If this article gets merged into Ron Edwards then The Big Model ought to be merged in there too (and maybe Trollbabe while we're at it).  The Big Model is just as bereft of reliable sources as this article is.  The Threefold Model is also totally unsupported by reliable references.  At first glance, Role-playing game theory has some sources, and is the logical home for GNS Theory, The Big Model and Threefold Model, but it's unclear whether any of the reliable sources there support any of these articles.  In summary GNS Theory, The Big Model and Threefold Model are all role playing cruft, unsupported by reliable sources, and of no demonstrated encyclopedic value. As psychological theories they fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)

Comment: This article appears to be closely related to Role-playing game theory|this. Maybe a merger or redirect is in order. I cannot find any |reliable sources that deal with this topic. Of the sources listed on the page, 5 link to one website, hardly an assertion of |notability. That being said, the article is over four years old and has been edited quite heavily by numerous editors. The article originally started out as a redirect to Libre Mo'Ron, which has since been deleted. I think this article boils down to one man's theory of RPGs. Without other references, this should be deleted or merged
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)