Deletion of Danvignes

Comment: There is a reference cited in the article, though none of us apparently has access to the book in question.  It's harder to find good online sources for a subject that is less recent.  I did see a few mentions in foreign language cites - http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.gtue-oldtimerservice.de/074,0045,03657,000,00000.html%3FPHPSESSID%3D3aef289bb0a728d988edacf9bffead0b&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=4&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DDanvignes%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4RNWN_en___US229 for example (horrible translation job) - which corroborate the info in the article.  I don't think  is so much the issue as 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: While orphaned articles aren't necessarily non-notable, this car seems to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I looked for more references to add but can find nothing about the vehicle. Would like to see it expanded but without refs its has to fail  as mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)