Deletion of Civony

Comment: unless |reliable sources are found.  The article is still essentially unsourced.  Of the sources, only this one: http://mu.ranter.net/nano-game-reviews/civony-nano-review is independent of the official site for the game, and it is self-published (a personal site).  This hardly establishes notability.  The people arguing to keep have not found sources.  I think they are going to need to find sources or explain why the current sources are adequate, in order for us to consider their recommendations to keep this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: for lack of demonstrable |notability. Yes, the site exists; yes, it is popular; yes, there are blog entries relating to it. However, none of these things qualify an article for inclusion. There is no significant coverage (barely any at all, in fact) in any |reliable sources. No prejudice against future re-creation - ''when and if it becomes notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)