Deletion of Comparison of video player software

Comment: Prices should be removed, citations should be added, etc. but it's a perfectly viable list. The important thing is that there's no shortage of other sources which offer similar lists/comparisons, the information is typically easily referenced, and all of the entries are notable examples with Wikipedia articles (presumably with references that could be brought over, even). As they're notable examples, and assuming the prices are removed, there's no  issue here. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The deletion rationale does not make any sense to me at all. This is a legitimate article following the standard  "Comparison of" type of articles Wikipedia has on many topics—:Category:Comparisons|comparisons are 100% legit on Wikipedia. The specific comparisons here (e.g. audio/video/container format support) are quite useful, too. Of course there is little prose, as is the case with |stand-alone lists. If there is something that needs to be sourced, that is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STANDALONE)

Comment: per . Comparison articles like this greatly aid comprehensibility of the topics they collate information about, and the enormous effort invested in their creation should not be squandered. Sources can likely be found for much of the material therein, and should be added where possible. I have added the \{\{refimprove\}\} template accordingly
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPAPER)

Comment:  does not apply here. First, it does not say anything about product comparisons, second, this article is not a guide (and does not use instructional, how-to language that  is about), third, '''Wikipedia itself acknowledges that ":Category:Comparisons|Comparison of" articles and |stand-alone lists are a legitimate category'''. Furthermore, all players in this stand-alone list are notable enough and have their own article.&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:STANDALONE)

Comment: as . Unless references that meet  can be added to show that the comparison criteria used in this article are the same criteria used in third party publications, and that the headings (such as the list of operating systems in the Operating System Compatibility) are also based on third party publications, then this article is entirely Original Research. If the sources can be found for these and other  issues, I'll change my mind to a "Keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)