Deletion of Canned tea

Comment: Meets . Many sources are paywalled snippet views, but here's a few: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb11530.x/abstract, https://books.google.com/books?id=Ra2jAgAAQBAJ&pg=RA2-PA34&dq=%22Canned+tea%22#v=onepage&q=%22Canned%20tea%22&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=vTjLBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA392&dq=%22Canned+tea%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8sY2ThdjKAhUS3mMKHZr7Bg04ChDoAQgzMAE#v=onepage&q=%22Canned%20tea%22&f=false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as easily satisfying |notability standards. I found and added another source and rewrote the History section by way of example as to how the article can be further improved. More work and more citations are needed to be sure, but the subject is clearly significant enough to merit its own article and should not be merged into the tea article. In particular, the History and Appeal sections can be further expanded with references to the growth of the canned and bottled tea product sector, overtaking sugary soft drinks and other canned or bottled beverages in many parts of the world in the 30+ years since the product was first introduced, which in and of itself is a remarkable and notable achievement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)