Deletion of Walter O'Brien

Comment: This is one of the silliest AFDs I've seen. The page has references to new articles from at least 15 separate publications. Some of the articles date back to the late 1980s. Quite a long time for a hoax to be perpetrated. I'm not sure what axe the nominator has to grind with O'Brien, but as someone who has spent significant amounts of time researching the subject and editing the page, it's clear that O'Brien is 100% real. Can every single one of his claims be independently verified? No. But '''many''' publications that are  have written about O'Brien. Easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE||WP:GNG)

Comment: This personal easily passes the .  There has been articles written about him in reliable sources, some of them questioning his claims.  He is notable even if a lot of his life is a hoax, based on coverage.  Wikipedia has plenty of articles on notable hoaxes.  oaxes and :Category:Impostors
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:H)