Deletion of Carl Lindgren

Comment: Does not pass . http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3A%22Carl+E+Lindgren%22 Citation impact seems to be minimal, and primarily related to obscure patents (if these are not false positives). WorldCat returns a few books by C. E. Lindgren, including books on aura theories that would probably fall under . These may be false positives, but even if they are not they fall short of indicating notability. The most widely held book is in only 36 libraries worldwide. The memberships do not seem to be in societies that would qualify under  criterion #3. For notability to be asserted under this criterion, the level of prestige of the societies must be comparable to, for example, the United States National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE||WP:PROF)

Comment: Clearly does not pass .  As for , I think it fails there as well: google news search http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22carl+lindgren%22+university&hl=en&um=1&sa=N&start=0 (here) turns up some hits for "Carl Lindgren" with the word university added, but most results do not appear to relate to the one discussed here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: What I'm seeing is a lot of puffed-up titles with little backing or significance, employment at something one step up from a diploma mill, and no sign of real |academic notability (or for that matter |real-world notability as measured by major media attention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)