Deletion of Wildlife Acoustics

Comment: satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I've tried to locate |reliable source coverage and keep turning up press releases and copies of the same.  I haven't located any  significant independent reliable source coverage to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Truly, I feel ''most of''  is met, however I would like to see a larger description of the company themselves, enough emphasis has been put on the product, a strong introduction in my opinion helps clarify its notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is no significant coverage of Wildlife Acoustics in reliable sources. That one of the company's products was reviewed in http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/30/technology/circuits/30bird.html ''The New York Times'' does not warrant an article for this company. According to , "a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right. In this case, an article on the product may be appropriate, and '''notability of the company itself is not inherited as a result'''" (my emphasis). The http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2010/04/11/going_with_what_they_know/ ''Boston Globe'' article discusses two entrepreneurs, one being Ian Agranat, the founder of this company. Most of the article focuses on the product of the company rather than the company itself.A http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Wildlife+Acoustics%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 Google News archive search returns only trivial mentions and press releases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT)