Deletion of Maggie Ausburn

Comment: obviously.  She was on a hit show with around 8 million viewers.  She was on for the whole season.  TV actors (or characters) with far less viewership/success get articles consistantly.  The standard is to keep Big Brother winners, despite the odd inexplicable exception, here and there.  This person easily meets the requirements of , regarding independent coverage from multiple sources.  Unfortunately, we seem to have a problem where certain genres of entertainment popular amongst Wikipedians (i.e. science fiction) get one easy standard , and genres unpopular in Wikipedia (though hugely popular outside) get a tougher standard.  The notion of measuring her "outside life" is silly.  We don't require an athlete be known outside sports, an actor outside acting, a politition outside politics.  She's tops on a top show.  That's enough
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)