Deletion of Keir H. Stahlsmith

Comment: Fails  including the more specific . There is no substantial, independent, secondary coverage of this person in independent sources, other than two short notes in local papers: (i) a picture of him at the age of 6 months with his mother after his older brother died in a tornado, http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=6lxaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=z0wNAAAAIBAJ&pg=5250,4832519&dq=kier+stahlsmith&hl=en and (ii) a nice note when he finished basic training in the Air Force.http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Keir+H.+Stahlsmith%22&hl=en&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=_0tVTbiwJsSutwfugpnfDA&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ The citations which are being claimed as a basis for notability is not a "widely known and significant award or honor" and the claimed accomplishments are not " widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field" - the latter guideline footnoted to clarify that, to meet that criteria, it would need to be something extensively written about by experts in the relevant field. The airman got a good performance report. Are we going to have a Wikipedia article on every kid who got a gold star and an A+ in red ink on a paper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: at first, I thought this was a prank! Aside from the obvious recreation issues, this is a BLP that is not well-referenced: most of the cited refs don't mention this individual at all (raising |COATRACK issues, seemingly trying to make this less a biography and more an article about aviation command and control operations), some are trivial mentions that offer no real biographical import, and the rest are not considered RS (mostly not independantly third party, a fitness report is certainly not even remotely reliable or even neutral); even if he really was involved in classified ops, there is no evidence that they existed or were notable, much less that he was integral to them. As I mentioned before, the article meanders from the subject to a strange aside regarding the films ''Ironman'' and ''Transformers''... odd and irrelevant. There are obvious POV concerns, seeing as this thing smacks of Wikipedia:Wikipuffery|puffery and disguising mundane tasks done as a part of his duties as notable achievements (I mean, c'mon, I've used TBMCS and GCCS and I'm not even an operations guy). And the meat of it is just plain notability: he fails , , , and ; absolutely nothing he has done sets him aside from all of the other airmen in his occupational specialty, no awards of note (his four are given to virtually every servicemember that survived a four year enlistment without getting thrown in the brig, and the "commemorative medals" are a joke that isn't even funny), no established innovation or significant contributions to military science or history, and of course, no recognition at all for what was an otherwise undistinguished career performing mundane duties. Lastly, slinging threats and Wikipedia:Wikilawyering|Wikilawyering with anyone who disagrees isn't going to help
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:GNG||WP:BIO||WP:BLP||WP:MILPEOPLE)