Deletion of Rong Xiang Xu

Comment: The existing references are extremely weak and nowhere near the |reliability threshold for a |biography of a living person. According to ''The Scientist'' (Reference #9) "Xu has not published any of his purported work on stem cells in peer-reviewed journals listed in PubMed", which is an immediate red flag for me. Although the Chinese Medical Doctor Association reference looks good at first glance (a .org website is always a good sign), this is no more than a '''passing mention''' of Xu in a long list of around 30 directors. Similarly, the "Meeting Transcript of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors" is undermined by Xu's introduction being followed by one of the participants asking if anyone can find a home for a stray chihuahua(!), which seriously questions the source's credibiilty. I'm not going to go through the other references individually but suffice to say they do nothing to establish notability. Xu's theories appear to be |fringe and thereby contrary to |Neutral point of view, |No original research, and |Verifiability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP||WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV||WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: Not much impact on scientific literature. Law suit is interesting but 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Not enough in-depth, independent coverage to meet , nor do they appear to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PROF)