Deletion of List of Internet phenomena 2

Comment: Thought the nomination is obviously a , somehow they have found an article that is nothing more than a category misnamed, with some additional, randomly selected entries.  states that "Lists should always include unambiguous statements of membership criteria based on definitions made by reputable sources, especially in difficult or contentious topics." This list is difficutl and contentious, and lacks such reliable sourcing. As such, it is a clear and obvious deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:LIST)

Comment: I suspect this nomination is intended to |disrupt wikipedia to prove a point. Rather than source the material to make it compliant with , we're getting this
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:BLP)

Comment: per Guy above.  As long as there are some rationale guidelines for inclusion (third party sourcing, evidence of notability, etc.) there are no content policies that this list ''must'' violate.  , , etc. problems need to be delt with but that doesn't require deletion.  I might reconsider if it were convicingly argued that this list were unmaintainable rather than just poorly maintained but noone above seems to be arguing that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BLP)