Deletion of Jonathan Rietti

Comment: The key difference between the Jonathan Rietti and the Mordechai Becher articles is that Mordechai Becher's lectures and writings have been picked up by institutions that have a reputation for reliability for what is and isn't |notable in the Jewish religious world, while Jonathan Rietti's lectures and works so far seem to have been largely self-published. To me, this is all the difference. In the one case we can apply a reasonable interpretation of the Wikipedia notability criteria and find a keep with integrity and clear documentation. In the other case, we can't. Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Based on the content of his biography, Rabbi Rietti doesn't seem |notable ''at this time''. Perhaps at some future time he will be notable; he should have an encyclopedia article at that time
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: The rationale here is essentially delete and merge, which is contrary to §4(I) of the Wikipedia:GFDL|GFDL as edit histories of merged text must be preserved. Per , "Consider making the page a useful redirect or proposing it be merged rather than deleted. Neither of these actions requires an AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)