Deletion of Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States

Comment: Based on Prachursharma's comments, I'm concerned now that Prachursharma may have created this article |to make a point, as a lot of the arguments brought forward are textbook 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: on . And as far as G10 speedy, you would have to completely ignore hundreds of years of (deadly) persecution based on the stereotypes perpetuated by these types of claims to say that it was '''not''' intended to  "''disparage, threaten, intimidate or harass... and serve no other purpose''". Although letting it go to its conclusion so that it can just be G4 speedied in the future has its merits as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: due to lack of reliable sources covering the notability of the intersection of persons who are chairmen of the Fed and religion.  All the sources that were being used by this article were correctly deleted as failing , leaving the article entirely unsourced.  I spent a few minutes doing good-faith searches on scholar.google.com, news.google.com and JSTOR and came up with nothing.  Making no comment here about other articles except to say that if I saw, for example, Religious affiliations of Vice Presidents of the United States AFD'd I'd apply the same criteria and do the same research.  Making no comment about the article creator's motivations as it's not necessary to do so; a simple application of Wikipedia notability policy results in Delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Obviously (to those of us not taking a too strict interpretation of ssume good faith) the purpose of the list is to  point out that most of the Chairmen have been Jewish.  Of course not every Jewish person is religious.  Overall the article is riginal research since secondary sources have not said that the religion or ethnicity of the person holding this job is something of importance, in contrast to the case of the President of the United States.  The article on the Vice Presidents should go too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:O)

Comment: Are there |reliable sources about the religious affiliations of the Fed Chair? None are cited in the article. That could be ''the'' relevant difference between this article and the others you mention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: on my reasons for declining a #G10|G10 speedy on this. If we are to take a purely factual list (assuming it to be accurate and sourced) as intended to "''disparage, threaten, intimidate or harass... and serve no other purpose''" we can only do that by making assumptions about the article author's motives. That is not a good basis for deletion decisions - we should consider the content, not the contributor. I have no doubt that Religious affiliations of Presidents of the United States shows a majority of protestant Christians - does that make it an anti-protestant hate page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: it will be virtually impossible to have sources for this article that meet the conditions of  (please note those conditions carefully).  As things stand, without sources we've got some pretty significant BLP violations here (hence the speedy).  Apart from that, the topic is simply not notable -- we would need sources that show us not only the religious affiliations but why they are a significant/encyclopedic matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCAT)

Comment: per JoelWhy: no |reliable sources have been cited, and I can find none, that treat this issue as notable.    And I further doubt whether there is reliable sourcing for some of the people on the list; for example, I have been unable to find any reliable source to substantiating the assertion, repeated often in anti-Semitic literature (but as far as I can find, not elsewhere), that Charles Hamlin was Jewish
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)