Deletion of Adam Highfield

Comment: as the above two keep !votes state above subject has received enough coverage to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: not convinced by arguments for  (not supported by reliable sources, but especially because Finland was only relatively pro recently IIRC) or  (sources don't quite cut the mustard, sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: possibly meets , but difficult to confirm, lack of available online sources is irritating but I am happy this player passes GNG based on the references in the article. the titles of sources 1 and 2 indicate to me coverage of a |non-routine nature, whilst http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/66470348/hundredup-canterbury-united-keeper-adam-highfield-still-showing-net-worth this referenced in the article, is a significant article discussing the career of and speaking with the player himself. The remainder look to me like more routine coverage from their titles, but it seems clear that this player has received a degree of significant coverage over an extended period of time throughout his career
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:MILL)

Comment: a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Coverage is in passing or routine. Does not meet  and there's nothing better
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY)

Comment: enough references have been identified for  to be passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: adequately sourced to  pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)