Deletion of LeafyIsHere

Comment: While notability can be of the good or bad variety, I am of the opinion that the sources shown violate  in that they are all flash in the pan publicity stunts that are not indicative of lasting notability as is the case with many articles of viral internet personalities. Wikipedia shouldn't fall for the same tactics that made them go viral in the first place
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: Passes : https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2019/10/03/what-happened-to-leafy-leafyishere-fans-youtube-return/ https://www.insider.com/leafy-leafyishere-back-youtube-idubbbz-why-video-cuck-memes-2020-4 https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/leafyishere-hits-back-at-disgusting-h3h3-following-idubbbz-drama-1352544 https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/leafyishere-hits-back-at-critics-celebrating-his-youtube-departure-1366963 https://hollywoodlife.com/2020/03/31/leafy-calls-out-idubbbz-new-video-watch/ https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/leafyishere-explains-what-drove-him-to-quit-youtube-201383 https://metro.co.uk/2019/12/12/youtubeisover-users-creators-threatening-delete-accounts-11782994
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: non-notable YouTuber, doesn't pass . My rebuttal to presented sources is above. They aren't reliable, and we consistently delete articles from people who have coverage in these kinds of sources but not wider, actually reliable coverage. If we gave everyone an article who gets featured on The Metro or other celebrity gossip sites, well, this encyclopaedia would be a dump
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)