Deletion of Sorcery 101

Comment: The nomination was from a drive-by anon who didn't even bother to complete the AfD.  This comic was picked up by Keenspot, which is the major syndicate for webcomics, meeting  3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per  and  alone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:V)

Comment: Keenspot is a syndicate, not a collective, so I won't accept the assertion it's not independent.  As far as  and  are concerned, they are intentionally broad and quite frankly I find your reading of them too strict.  With the exception of , I am not inclined to immediately delete an article on what I feel to be a notable subject simply because it hasn't yet evolved into a well-sourced one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:BLP)

Comment: per wikipediatrix and per  and . Unless somebody credible (and that doesn't necessarily mean a professor) writes about this, it's not suitable for inclusion. Notability is not subjective (to steal Uncle G's neato catchphrase
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: Published on Keenspot, thus meets  furthermore a declaration of |"NN" is not a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: I'm not advocating we keep every article.  I think I've sent enough articles to AfD and prod to establish that.  However, if I believe a subject is sufficiently important for an article, I'm not going to advocate its deletion simply because it's not dotted its Is and crossed its Ts.  They are policies and guidelines, not dogma.  As far as Keenspot is concerned, I really don't think it's necessary to rehash this argument every time one of its comics is nominated for deletion.  Bring it up on  instead.  From prior discussions held there it's my impression Keenspot ''is'' considered an indicator for item 3, but of course that can always change
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: fails the / combo
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:V)

Comment: Keenspot is an invite-only commercial webcomic syndicate which meets meets . Formerly on Comicgenesis. http://guide.comicgenesis.com/KeenspaceNumPL_1.html#c_sorcery101 20/7866 for ComicGenesis PageRank, 1.00% of all ComicGenesis traffic. Notable ComicGenesis comics by traffic appear in the http://guide.comicgenesis.com/KeenspaceNumPL_1.html Top 25 or http://guide.comicgenesis.com/KeenspaceNumPL_2.html Next 26-50
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)