Deletion of The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery

Comment: No, not all museums are notable.  They must meet the burden of  just like any other organization
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: There has already been an attempt to create an article about Mayerson Law which was deleted by AFD (rticles for deletion/Mayerson Law|here).  The citations found by Orlady regarding Hy Mayerson amount to little more than mentions in passing.  I don't know that the church history will prove to be that significant.  (If it were, the locals probably wouldn't have allowed Mayerson to alter the structure.)  While there's a little bit of a lot of stories here, I don't think any one of them merit inclusion, and I don't think the sum of the parts adds up to anything coherent enough to build an article on
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: Sources are very poor, and not a single one seems to concern the building, giving this a light of . It's a shame Wikipedia:Notability (buildings, structures, and landmarks) didn't pass (perhaps it's time to try to make this one again?). In light of no specific guidelines, and this failing GNG, I am afraid delete is the only valid way. However, this is a nice article, and we could userfy it. It could also be merged into Spring City, Pennsylvania, itself a mess, it's history section seems to be a total OR, see inline comment visible in edit mode at the bottom of that section... If the people from "Spring-Ford Historical Society" or such could publish this on their website, if they have one, we could use it as a source. But it seems to me that some local history affectionados are trying to use Wikipedia as a web host :( Is there a local wikia it could be moved to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)