Deletion of Yellow Valentino dress of Cate Blanchett

Comment: My grief, there's articles on individual dresses being made now? *headdesk* Blatant  violation, although what criteria it would fit (probably multiple ones), I'm not sure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I was fulling going into this thinking "Delete", but I was swayed by Dr. Blofield's arguments. Its certainly never an article I'd create/write/read, but it doesn't matter. There's a precendent that articles about dresses are appropriate, and there's the coverage to satisfy the . Separate of my lack of interest in the subject, it does appear worth keeping
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject appears to pass , and is signifigant for being a work of article.  I find Blofeld and DGG's arguments to be compelling
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The content presented is backed by reliable sources and provides sufficient support such that the subject of this article meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm not sure how I ultimately come down on this one. While fashion generally is undercovered in Wikipedia, I'm not sure that lots of articles on individual Oscar dresses are the solution to that problem.  (See Cathy Horyn's many rants about red-carpet "fashion".)  I agree that there is a ton of coverage, but most is contemporaneous, so  might be a problem here.  On the other hand, eight years later, I still instantly recognized this dress and many or most American women could probably say the same.  I think the best solution might be a broader article, as suggested by Clarityfiend, collecting various important awards ceremony dresses for the year.  Perhaps dresses with lasting coverage could have their own articles (Versace safety-pin dress comes to mind), but ones that spark a flurry of coverage that dies down relatively quickly could be included in articles with a broader scope
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The question is not "is this article reliably sourced" because it's obvious that it is. The question is "is this dress notable" which means more than reliably sourced. It also, for example, has to pass the |one event test and that is my main concern with this article (and is why I wouldn't consider nominating dresses that have had an obvious lasting impact). Granted, the |one event policy as written applies to people not dresses but (part of the problem IMO) there are no guidelines for determining which dresses are notable and which are not. I think it's fair to apply the one event test to these dresses. I am not a fashion guru (even though I'm smoking hot) but my assumption is that editors here will evaluate this dress against that and other relevant criteria and come to a consensus. Thank you
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:BIO1E)