Deletion of Battle of Kock (1944)

Comment: subject appears to lack "signficant coverage" in |reliable sources and is therefore likely not notable under . IMO its not that there wasn't fighting in Kock in 1944, there likely was as indeed our article on Operation Tempest suggests, its whether or not this was significant enough to warrant an article of its own. At this stage without sources to back it up I don't think it was. Of course if new works become available that cover the events in detail then I would support recreation without prejudice. Archival material would probably constitute OR and would not be enough to establish notability on their own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: What sources lead you to believe that there was a "Battle of Kock" in 1944 that was part of Operation Tempest?  I agree that there is more in the world of reference material than that which can be found on the Internet.  However, per |verifiability, one of the fundamental policies of Wikipedia, we need sources to verify that there was even such a battle.  That an editor added an item to a list of articles to be created in a Wikiproject does not excuse it from needing references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)