Deletion of List of people with multiple marriages

Comment: What crap did I refer to? The richest people? I don't think it is crap, and I don't think that you really think it is crap either.  involves invoking a dodgey article, The richest people article has a long history on Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: per #IINFO and #DIR. A cat would be fine for this information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: poorly sourced, possible  violation, anyways thousands of people would likely qualify for this list, and having multiple marriages isn't a claim of notabilty for almost every single one. Perfect example of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: Clearly an |INTERESTING article that doesn't contribute anything to encyclopedic human knowledge. If the oft-repeated claim that "half of all marriages end in divorce" is true, then half of all people who've ever been married could theoretically be on a list like this, without the arbitrary inclusion criterion of four
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INTERESTING)

Comment: I usually apply #IINFO to the extreme, but this list has (IMO) some  information that is  to thousands of housewifes who have nothing better to do than read the yellow press all day (not that there's anything wrong with that). This list seems pretty well maintained; just add some sources and maybe lose the "ranks" and increase the cut off point to 6. This is a case where gnore all rules may apply. &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:INTERESTING||WP:USEFUL||WP:I)