Deletion of Kreuz Oberhausen

Comment: This is one of a group of Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive nominations for deletion by a small number of systemically biased editors who have a fixed agenda of wanting all articles about Autobahn interchanges in Germany to be deleted, even though they have carried out no research into whether the subjects of the articles pass  or not, and are therefore contending that they fail GNG without regard to whether that contention is true or false.  For that reason, this nomination, like all disruptive editing, should be treated as vandalism, and should be withdrawn.  See also my more detailed comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Despite the accusation above, there is no  here, there is , and there is no failure of  (which was not stated but inferred). ''Every'' interchange on the Autobahn is named. Therefore, unlike in most other places, one cannot assume that a named intersection is an indication of something special and, therefore, probable notability - instead, it's . Interchanges are not things that are inherently notable; they have to rise and fall on GNG alone, and I'm not seeing how this (as with the vast majority of other Autobahn interchanges) does so. There is no bias, and |there is no cabal, there is only |notability, and Yoda|this is how it fails
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:BIAS||WP:NOTVAND||WP:BEFORE||WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||WP:TINC||WP:N)