Deletion of Hunter Ligon

Comment: as |vanispamcruftisement.  If the subject is genuinely notable someone other than him will be along with an indepednently written article soon enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:VSCA)

Comment: Come on now guys. The cites from ''actual'' sources don't discuss him, they're peripheral and do not support a biography. From : ''A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent,6 and independent of the subject.''  The others that mention him only do so in passing or are not |reliable sources. Ligon was pretty creative in trying to |game the system but it doesn't change the fact that this article dosn't meet the bio criteria for notability. It is also a clear |conflict of interest and vanity. After all that the sockpuppets just illustrate that this is a dishonest effort to game
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS||WP:GAME||WP:COI)