Deletion of List of Comics Journal interview subjects

Comment: This is useful to researchers.  This is useful information.  This is entirely in keeping with the point of Wikipedia.  There is no better reason to delete given here than "I don't like it".  You know what?  Tough.  This is an extension of the article on the Journal, and were it a category people would say listify.  It's solid, sourced information that is utilised by scholars.  It does not violate  in any shape, manner or form.  I would note the people who are trying to force their opinion through with the claim that it violates ''Wikipedia_is not an indiscriminate collection of information'' miss the vital point that policy makes, that '''"there is a continuing debate about the encyclopedic merits of several classes of entries"'''. The section even goes on to detail the only areas that have consensus, none of which this list meets.  asks us to consider '''what a reader would expect to find under the same heading in an encyclopedia'''.  I would suggest this article fits the bill.  You don't personally happen to like it?  Ignore it.  Edit your style sheet to pretend it doesn't exist.  But don't delete it.  It's information which is of use
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)