Deletion of Walstad's Paradox

Comment: per  and, frankly, per .  Arguing whether the empty set has no value and attempting to assign meaning based on bad analogy to "1/0"??  Kid, stop trying the mushrooms and userfy this non-rigorous fluff until you get it covered by |reliable sources by WP's standards.  For a topic like this, the source needs to be a peer-reviewed journal, or some really substantial coverage by general mass media
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NFT||WP:RS)

Comment: Fascinatingly philosophical, but unfortunately is textbook |original research. I wish Mr. Walstad well, and if his work gets published in mathematical journals we can write an article about him then
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)