Deletion of United Airlines Flight 627

Comment: not notable per ircrash; a runway excursion resulting in no serious injuries nor changes to aviation procedures warrants a paragraph in Newark_Liberty_International_Airport#Accidents_and_incidents|the "Accidents and Incidents" section of the article for EWR, but not an entire article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: as per , we do not need to document every single airplane crash, especially not those where no one died or was injured
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Hard one for me to decide and I think it was a bit premature to nominate this for deletion ''yet'', per the suggestion at  (same applies to whether or not the article should have been created in the first place, but it's here now).  On the one hand, the incident was not notable, in the generic sense of the word, it was a hard landing that caused damage and disruption, and that happens all the time.  Well, not really, but pretty frequently.  No injuries or fatalities.   On the other hand, the incident may result in a hull loss based upon the amount of damage it sustained, which raises it above my "keep" threshold, despite Petebutt's probably accurate statement that it could be an insurance write-off due to the age of the craft, there just hasn't been any reporting on the fact yet of whether that is the case.  I also haven't seen anything about how many hours the aircraft has flown, which is a more accurate measure of how much life the aircraft has left in it.   The incident has received international news coverage, I just don't know whether or not the coverage will remain sustained over time.  It's too soon to tell.   So, don't delete ''yet''.  If the plane is repaired and returns to service and we don't learn anything new from the investigation, it would be an easy delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)