Deletion of Ethan Hunt

Comment: Lead character in a billion dollar film franchise, there's been plenty of material written about the character and, more importantly, the portrayal of him by Tom Cruise, including much material on the real-world production of the stunts that the character is known for. Yes, that does speak to the notability of the character, as real-world production aspects are exactly what should be added. Does the article stand to incorporate some of that better? Sure, and when I'm not so busy I'll work on it. But AFD is not cleanup. More importantly, the nom's  must not have been very through, because even a cursory click on the link here yields plenty of material from quality sources specifically about the character that could easily be used. Jumping to deletion is a mission I chose not to accept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: to Mission: Impossible (film series). Notability is not the main issue here, it's that this article is 95% plot summary and thus has been failing  and #Summary style approach for over 14(!) years. It's obvious that no-one wants to work on this article, so remove it until someone does. (By the way, Benji Dunn and Luther Stickell would have been the lower hanging fruits to clean up the M:I character coverage.) &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPLOT||WP:WAF)

Comment: as has significamt coverage in multiple reliable sources as identified earlier in this discussion so  is passed and there is no need for deletion, imv
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)