Deletion of Tat (consumer item classification)

Comment: This is weird. On one hand the deletion nomination reckons it is an "everyday concept", which would make it immediately notable. On the other, indeed I can't find anything else on the concept apart from http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tat#English its vocabulary definition and some https://www.google.com/search?q=tat+trinket&btnG=Cerca+nei+libri&tbm=bks&tbo=1&hl=it#q=%22tat%22+cheap+item&hl=it&safe=off&tbo=1&tbm=bks&ei=6CyLUNG_GMeJ0QHfnYD4Cw&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=6bdb771991db536b&bpcl=35466521&biw=1535&bih=787 usage of it in books. The page looks totally like  now however. I wonder if there is a suitable redirect, if not, let's delete, without prejudice for recreation if sources are found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: WP is |NOT a DICTionary, nor a home for unsourced S. Wiktionary, perhaps, or anybody's slang dictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NOTDICT||WP:ESSAY)