Deletion of Jim Chapman (Canadian) (2nd nomination)

Comment: just about. I never liked articles with 40 references where 30 of them are non-independent, but there does appear to be a small number of substantial sources about the person, both at local (London Free Press) and national level (ABC). Probably meets , which is just as well as he fails pretty much all of the additional criteria at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ENT)