Deletion of Chlotrudis Society for Independent Film

Comment: Sorry, I don't see it.  An advanced Google News search turns up only TWO hits for this obscure local organization: a press release from its own website, and a Globe article.  Strictly local coverage of its events fails WP:GEOSCOPE, and the GNG requires that there be ''multiple'' sources -- if there were fifty ''Boston Globe'' articles, and still nothing else from a |reliable, independent, third-party, published source that wasn't the ''Globe,'' that would not pass the GNG.   requires that, as a non-commercial organization, the organization not only pass the GNG, but that "The scope of their activities is national or international in scale."  This organization would fail that test as well, unless it could prove that it has "achieved national or even international notice" or "there is substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area."  Add in that this blizzard of subordinate articles is just plain absurd -- and if no one else files a bundled AfD on them, I'll be happy to do so myself -- and there you go
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:CLUB)

Comment: per . While http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2009/03/15/and_the_cat_on_a_stick_goes_to/?page=full this by ''The Boston Globe'' is significant coverage, I am not finding "substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area". While ''Lonely Planet'' mentions the organization, it is still just a mention. The book results are also just mentions. http://blog.thephoenix.com/BLOGS/outsidetheframe/archive/2011/03/22/chlotrudis-17.aspx This at ''The Phoenix'' and by Peter Keough (a critic and member of the Boston Society of Film Critics and National Society of Film Critics) would be helpful if it was not just an alternative weekly newspaper from the local area. The trade papers ''Variety'' and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' usually do a good job mentioning these organizations in some form, but between these two, this organization is only mentioned briefly http://variety.com/2007/film/news/matthew-libatique-the-fountain-1117956617/ here. I'm willing to reconsider if additional significant coverage can be indicated, but I am not finding enough to warrant an encyclopedic article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CLUB)