Deletion of GolemLabs

Comment: WP:USEFUL|Useful is not a reason to keep. Lacks |independent coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: nothing here in indicate any |verifiability, though I'd question (at least in regard to the current version) whether or not it's written as an advertisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: as failing  due to lack of |independent coverage - only self-written company profiles to be found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: as |advertising for a seemingly-inactive company. The ad was an epic failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: The article largely described forum-based speculation and fan opinion, which I have removed per  along with the spammy content. Still, the company does not seem to have attracted any attention from the gaming press (no Google News hits; only press releases and token directory entries on IGN, GameSpy etc) and our coverage should reflect that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)