Deletion of Steadfast Networks

Comment: Not sure why this is being railroaded. Not all of the refs look good but there's definitely enough there for me to . Different editors have different standards for notability. Lower standards need to prevail until the article has had time to mature - it's only been with us for a month and a half
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: I didn't create it for the hate site list (their response to the article puts that into context very well), I just didn't have much time to look up more sources. I specifically made sure that it hit the requirements for a notability and created it, thinking that someone else would improve it or I would find time to add more noteworthy information. It isn't my fault that nobody else has added anything. You say that it doesn't fit encyclopedic standards but don't cite any notability guidelines (the relevant one being , which this passes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: This is an ISP or web hosting business, |one of many.  Being listed on lists of "5000 Fastest Growing Private Companies in America" does not confer encyclopedic significance on each of the 5000 business so listed.  Neither does being the web host for a handful of hate sites
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: No indication of significance, let alone any |notability, could be #A7|CSD A7, but never the less fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CSD||WP:GNG)