Deletion of Karl Henze

Comment: There is not much to read about Karl Hanke. Criterion 5 of  as such does not presume notability. Rather it is but one criterion to presume {{tq|that individuals will almost always have sufficient coverage to qualify}} as notable. {{tq|Conversely, any person who is only mentioned in genealogical records or family histories, or is traceable only through primary documents, is not notable. Likewise, those who are only mentioned in passing in reliable secondary sources should not be considered notable for the purposes of a stand-alone article, although, depending upon the circumstances, they may warrant mention within an existing article or list. In determining this, the breadth of coverage should be considered.}} To mention Hanke in a list, is exactly what is being proposed, because the coverage in RS is anything but broad
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: No evidence of the significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that the GNG demands, and he definitely doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: many trivial mentions doesn't equate to significant coverage.  is an essay, and it's not clear if he passes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: He meets  5 as a Gruppenkommandeur of a unit that specifically saw military action (this is the same level as the Group_(military_aviation_unit)|Group, which is specifically cited in criterion 5 of SOLDIER). I have the impression that most of the '''Delete''' contributors have either not read the article under discussion, or , clearly enough: we should not be having this debate. The oak leaves, in this case, are a complete red herring
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: The keep arguments at this AfD are along the lines of  and / or "coverage exists". These are not valid deletion discussion arguments and I believe that they should be discounted. Furthermore, such interpretations of SOLDIER is not consistent with the close of the discussion regarding the "Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners": https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)&oldid=761353972#Redirect_proposal_for_Knight.27s_Cross_winners link, which showed that for a high proportion of Knight's Cross winners, irrespective of grade, significant RS coverage does not exist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE)