Deletion of Austin Road

Comment: to List of roads and streets in Hong Kong.  {{u|Arxiloxos}}' reference is the same one cited as a reason to keep Jordan Road, Hong Kong. To recap, it's a guidebook and although it may have a chapter entitled "Austin Road", the coverage therein is about surrounding buildings and features, which may or may not be notable in their own right. Notability is |not inherited such that a road being the location of a notable feature does not make the road itself notable. The "in-depth" source cited by {{u|Oakshade}} contains exactly 20 words (excluding Chinese characters) on Austin Road that do nothing more than describe its route, hardly earth-shattering and readily available elsewhere other than Wikipedia (i.e. Wikitravel or Wikivoyage). Furthermore, the fact that the road is named after John Gardiner Austin contributes to his notability, not the other way around. In summary, per , this road is |non-notable and lacks the required |significant coverage in |independent |reliable sources to warrant its own article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:ROADOUTCOMES||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:THIRDPARTY||WP:RS)

Comment: Substantial coverage is cited in the article, although the nominator evidently disagrees that it's substantial coverage.  This is one of a large number of cookie-cutter nominations intent on wiping out the existing comprehensive coverage of the streets of Hong Kong.  I don't think these deletions would result in an improvement to the encyclopedia.  I wouldn't necessarily object to thoughtful, substantive mergers of these street articles into one or more collective articles in keeping with the teachings of ; wholesale deletion is not consistent with my conception of our editing policies and the values that explain why this project exists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)