Deletion of John Edward Kelly (general)

Comment: strangely no mention of him https://nwc.ndu.edu/History/ here. Even if he were, #6 would not apply since the college is part of the National Defense University which by itself may not pass the bar of "a major academic institution or major academic society." I think this rather falls under "Lesser administrative posts (provost, dean, department chair, etc.) are generally not sufficient to qualify under Criterion 6 alone" and to me his position looks more like head of a department
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: I'm not seeing SIGCOV in multiple RS necessary to satisfy . I have gone through the https://history.army.mil/html/bookshelves/resmat/index.html and don't see him mentioned anywhere. The lack of coverage for a 3 star General is surprising, but he seems to have had a series of low-key assignments and didn't play any significant role in the Korean War, Vietnam War or Cold War
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Lieutenant Generals are considered flag/general officers? If so, they are generally considered notable according to . If Lieutenant Generals are considered field grade officers though, they need to show notability independent of their military rank
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)