Deletion of Red Bluff shooting

Comment: Let me also invoke 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: to List of mass shootings in the United States in 2020#List. This is clearly a very tragic event, and it did get articles in national news sources, including https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/27/us/walmart-shooting-red-bluff-california.html ''The New York Times'' and https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/27/us/california-walmart-distribution-center-shooting/index.html CNN, but it's not clear that it merits a stand alone article. Events such as these should be shown to have |a lasting effect and both |a depth and |continuance of coverage to indicate notability. It seems that the news cycle has largely stopped reporting on the shooting, and it isn't shown to be any more notable or lasting than any other mass shooting. |Wikipedia is not news, and this event doesn't seem to have lasting notability. Again, this doesn't make the event any less tragic, just means that it doesn't merit its own article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:DEPTH||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: There is no universally-accepted metric for difining a “mass shooting.” The FBI, however, defines “mass murder” as an incident in which four or more people are either killed or injured. In this case, there were six. Apart from that, the shooting has received enough coverage from reliable sources to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Article appears to meet  as a quick google search shows that there has been significant coverage by reliable third party sources. I'm inclined to to agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Keep, or merge per  to Red Bluff, California#History or List of mass shootings in the United States in 2020#List
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap (WP:CHEAP)