Deletion of List of Internet slang phrases (3rd nomination)

Comment: per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:POVFORK)

Comment: Violation of #DICTIONARY, "Wikipedia articles are not slang guides". Some seriously weak keep arguments here, especially considering this violates policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as collection of |dictionary definitions, and a fairly |indiscriminate one at that. Yes, it's useful, but it'll be just as useful with the content moved to Wiktionary. A link to the Wiktionary list should be placed prominently on the Internet slang article, and this page redirected there. I don't think this list is even particularly helpful as a navigation aid between the related articles, since we already have {{cl|Internet slang}} for that purpose
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICDEF||WP:IINFO)

Comment: as per  points 2, 3, 4 and 6
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LC)

Comment: per  '''or transwiki''' to wiktionary. I am aware that this list breaches a few guidelines, but as a disambiguation editor, I'd point out how often you have to link some abbrevation or acronym on a dab page ''somewhere'', and this list used to be my perfect dumping ground. It is much less painful to direct over-eager editors to the right wikipage instead of removing the internet abbrevations from dab pages every other day. I as a non-chatter (would) also find this list . &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: not a fork, but 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)

Comment: Clear 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: We have the article Internet slang and then a list of internet slang (phrases), so this is not an inappropriate content fork.  says Wikipedia is not a slang guide, but this list happens to be on slang words and is a more appropriate content-fork than ''many'' other lists on Wikipedia. If it does violate  then we should keep it per IAR. There are many similar lists that I doubt would be deleted: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixindex&from=List+of+English+words+&namespace=0. This is also an extremely useful list. There are many redirects to it, where if a reader is uncertain of a certain slang phrase, he/she can search for it on Wikipedia and be directed to this list right to the entry of the phrase. See IIRC for example. It would be a great loss to Wikipedia to lose this list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Since this has been transwikied, and is a borderline case of . Saying borderline here as it's partly a slang guide (bad), and partly sourced glossary (possibly ok, per discussion over at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: Yes. But as it says there, something like  "should generally be avoided, or at least, supplemented with some more arguments" and in my opinion this is a case where its sufficiently  (and relevant to a computer-medium encyclopedia, where I just had to look up CMIIW via Google a few minutes ago as it was used on another talk page) that it might over-ride the basic bias against using the argument/reason. An encyclopedia lists its own internally-used abbrieviations not because tehy're encyclopedic but because they are necessary, and understanding computer-ese is oftentimes necessary to navigate discussions here. Still, I continue to (weakly) favor deletion for just this reason: Utility is insufficient justification for keeping it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: as this violates the spirit if not the letter of , I think it is consensually agreed that we should not be hosting specialized slang lexicons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: just checking, you're all aware  is one of the Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, right
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL)