Deletion of Chadwick Airport

Comment: at the risk of sounding like , I think we should review other airports and see if there is a precedent that is supported by consensus... which I believe that there is.  Hillside Airport, Abilene Municipal Airport, Strother Field, Blosser Municipal Airport, Cessna Aircraft Field, Clay Center Municipal Airport, Colonel James Jabara Airport, Hamilton Field (Kansas), Lloyd Stearman Field--some of the 42 articles in the category "Kansas Airport Stubs" -- one state, some private, some municipal.  It's worth considering
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: How about a bit of consistency on Wikipedia? Are we agreeing that if: (a) Something exists and (b) a National government recognises it exists; therefore it is notable? If so, all the AFDs we get on here about schools, for example, will automatically fail? Is this the NEW policy () for notability being agreed? somehow, I doubt it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Privately owned or not,  by law, extensive FAA records alone exist on every operating airport in the US.  Just because there's not FAA hyperlinks in an article doesn't magically mean they don't exist.  Even 's heading makes a case of common sense
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Is there a notability guideline for airports besides the  standards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The airport exists, has flights coming out of it and an airport code. Easily meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Once again, it's not got anything to do with the fact that it hs an FAA code. That means nothing to . That just says that it's an airport. But, it's an airport minus any coverage thus it's non notable. We can't give a blanket notability permission for all airport stubs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)