Deletion of Janet Rehnquist

Comment: Try reading   There actually is notability demonstrated by the references identified here. The argument that there is "no notability" because the readily accessible refs Dhartung and I have identified have not been added to the article yet is invalid. The refs are there and clearly satisfy  and , which do not require that they must have been added to the article. An imperfect and incomplete article is a candidate for editing, not for deletion. Others can add the references. This AFD will always be accessible on the talk page and will provide a source of material to improve and expand the article.    says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable." It does not say that the article must include those references to survive AFD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: A Google News archive search http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22Janet+Rehnquist%22&ie=UTF-8 produces several hundred article in reliable sources with substantial coverage, easily satisfying . Certainly the article should be kept free of any  violations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BLP)