Deletion of Debbi van der Putten

Comment: Per what appears to be an apparent lack of source searching prior to nomination, as suggested at , section D. The first page of the Google News link above provides several reliable sources comprised of significant coverage about this person, who clearly passes  and . Some articles include: http://www.fijitimes.com/story.aspx?id=93440, http://www.brabantsdagblad.nl/regios/brabant//2599831/Met-handicap-kun-je-ook-mooi-zijn.ece, http://www.telegraaf.nl/vrouw/psyche_relatie/4140427/__Ineens_begon_de_bus_te_slingeren...__.html, http://www.delmagyar.hu/szines-hirek/puceran_pozolt_a_felkaru_modell/2062408
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: per above and |snowball close - The subject clearly meets notability. The fact that the article is badly written and referenced is not a valid reason to delete, it can easily be fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)