Deletion of Peter Hurley (doctor)

Comment: The citation record listed above by {{u|Stuartyeates}} is a strong indication for meeting #1. Granted, the most-cited articles only list Hurley as a minor author (listed somewhere in the middle of multiple authors), but some of the opther highly-cited articles he is first or last author. Especially for someone who passed away 30 years ago, this is not bad at all. The absence of accessible sources on the person himself is a bit worrysome, though (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:V)

Comment: He probably satisfies , as the founder of a department of nuclear medicine and a co-author of quite a few highly-cited articles.http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=Peter+Hurley&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp= Unfortunately all of the article's references are offline so they can't really be evaluated, but for someone who died in 1983 that's not too surprising. It sounds as if he gets a significant chapter in the Bruce White book; presumably the Auckland Star and New Zealand Herald articles are obits which also suggests at least some notability. I am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: While borderline, the fact that his work was more than 30 years ago may have something to do with a lack of a web presence. But what is currently there is enough for him to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)