Deletion of Center for Urban Research and Learning

Comment: I've added some sources. Although they are not independent since the author is affiliated  with CURL, they were published by third parties and have a high impact factor. A search of Google scholar turn up hundreds of papers https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=110&q=“Center+for+Urban+Research+and+Learning”&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 A search of Google news https://www.google.com/search?q=%25Center+for+Urban+Research+and+Learning%25 and newspapers.com https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=%22Center+for+Urban+Research+and+Learning%22 shows that this institutions research is often cited by the popular press. In summary, I think that that although CURL fails  due to source independence issues, it passes  due to the continuing coverage of its research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG)

Comment: Passes . I would add that the preamble to  states "though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply." This article provides useful information on a significant organisation and there is no way that WP would be improved by its deletion. A good dose of common sense should be applied
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG||WP:GNG)