Deletion of Alterra Mountain Company (2nd nomination)

Comment: works as  as all resorts are independently notable. An overview article, with brief info on the corporate parent, is appropriate. Could possibly be moved to "List of ..." article, but this could be decided on the article's Talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: as per DGG and Jtbobwaysf, having a list of this sort is very useful.  Also, the Denver Post (https://www.denverpost.com/2018/01/11/alterra-mountain-ksl-capital-partners-aspen-skiing-co/ and SkiMagazine (https://www.skimag.com/ski-resort-life/latestmergerrocksskiindustry) articles (at a minimum) meet , so Alterra appears to meet the requirements for keeping on that basis as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: notability is not inherited. While the content might stand alone as an article of list, the subject doesn't. Per , content doesn't make subject notability. Having a list of a notable resorts doesn't make the company owning them notable. And my brief search on Google and a few business related sources doesn't yield significant coverage of the subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN)

Comment: not just for the notable properties, but the newly formed company itself has started to get some coverage.  In addition to that mentioned above, Chicago Tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/travel/ct-trav-ikon-versus-epic-pass-ski-0226-story.html, Aspen Times https://www.aspentimes.com/news/local/business-monday-alterra-mountain-co-entrepreneur-at-odds-over-ikon-trademark/ and USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/destinations/2018/01/26/alterras-ikon-pass-gives-skiers-real-rival-vails-epic-pass/1070807001/. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)