Deletion of Fortress Linux

Comment: I can't find |significant coverage for this software
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Prior to making this vote I was forced by conscience (no, not you MLauba, my own conscience) to make a report at Wikipedia:SPI#Fortresslinux|SPI.  I find it worth noting that at least four different accounts related to the closed SPI have tried to add or make made positive edits to this article (or its two deleted brethren) in the recent past, the text emanating from these accounts being identical in many cases.  My concern with the article is that even once it has risen above about a dozen different concerns (ranging from  to  and lots in between) it won't hit  or even anywhere in the neighborhood.  For this post I'd rather use thumb rules for this vote than citing specific passages of relevant documentation.  Much as the simple thumb rule Explodicle uses above, my thumb rule is "Can you make it on to Distrowatch?"  Since Distrowatch's standards for notability (whatever those may be) are 'generally somewhat' lower than Wikipedia's, if you can't make on there, you're probably not going to make it on here.  Fortress Linux is nowhere to be found on Distrowatch.  The notability comparison I'm using (merely as a guideline) is based on List of Linux distributions vs. http://distrowatch.com/stats.php?section=popularity Linux Distributions - Facts and Figures.  Once you make Distrowatch, then maybe you can come back and try to make WP.  Because of the assertion fact that multiple accounts that seem to be are the same person copying and pasting the same text from the fortresslinux web site to this article in the recent past, and the article has already been deleted twice this month alone, in addition to a 'delete' vote I also propose a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:COI||WP:N||WP:SALT)