Deletion of Gropegate

Comment: This actually does seem to be a term used by the media, but not solely in connection with Arnold. While news stories related to him do show up in a Google search for "Gropegate" (#2, after Wikipedia, is http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/02/recall.schwarzenegger/index.html this, but the actual article does not use the term, so I'm not sure why it is showing as a #2 result for the term), and these news reports: http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/10/9/212519.shtml http://goliath.ecnext.com/premium/0199/0199-3303779.html, as well as those "subscription only" URLs, but the term does come up quite a bit in a news http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Gropegate&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn archive search.  However, it is also associated with other public figures, as seen http://gawker.com/news/culture/the-christian-slater-gropegate-souvenier-docket-106195.php here. I think the bigger issue, would be the obvious  concerns, and that if the article remains, it must be exceedingly well sourced, and very carefully written for neutrality and BLP issues
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)