Deletion of Branislav Tošić

Comment: fails to have any verifiable sources.  I would also suggest tightening  to be a better predictor of passing  since so many footballer articles end up here at AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: u|R96Skinner}}  doesn't override  per  FAQ Q1: "The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline". So the fact he meets them is irrelevant. As someone who is from Serbia, I was unable to find reference that is covering him indepth. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:GNG||WP:ATH||WP:BASIC)

Comment: I feel like too many users are starting to ignore 's relation to , and all should be discounted by the closing admin as not based in policy/guideline. If someone is not happy with that, they can start looking for consensus on 's talk page to remove "The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline" part instead of flooding most of these football AfDs with generic  throwing of "meets ". That needs to stop
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATH||WP:GNG||WP:ATH||WP:JUSTAVOTE||WP:FOOTY)

Comment: long (and ongoing) career including many appearances in FPL - meets . I refuse to believe there aren't more sources out there, especially given age and language issues which are likely hindering online searches
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Yeah, no. Sadly, none of the added sources meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: passes  and  is currently playing.SNGs including  exist to provide for the inclusion of certain defined subjects that cannot immediately be shown to pass GNG. An SNG provides for a presumption of notability, not a presumption of non-notability An SNG cannot be used to exclude/delete an article when the subject passes GNG, but the reverse is patently absurd because that would negate the entire reason for the existence of SNGs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTY||WP:FOOTY)

Comment: This article, post-|HEY, is very good given the available sourcing, showcasing SF's talents as an editor and writer. I agree it meets  and is well-written. I'd love to change my !vote to "Keep because SF put time into this and did a good job." But, alas, for me to do so would be . Notability of a subject is independent from quality of an article; just like a poorly-written article should be kept if the subject is notable, a well-written article should still be deleted if the subject is not notable. And it's not just a matter of taking the notability ''guideline'' and imposing it like a strict rule; I think there is a very good reason to delete this article:{{pb}}This article gets less than one page view per day: 190 page views from Jan–Aug 2019; Sep 1 is the 244th day of the year https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2019-01-01&end=2019-09-01&pages=Branislav_Tošić. It is not of interest to readers of enwiki. (Also, it's further evidence that "#-of-apps-in-an-FPL" is not a good way to predict notability.) Every page requires editor-hours to build and maintain, and our limited editor-hours are better spent on article subjects that are of interest to readers. There are, no doubt, many other Serbian football players who readers ''are'' interested in, and we should free up our resources to focus on ''those'' articles, instead of this one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The Heymann Standard (WP:HEY||WP:V||WP:ILIKEIT)