Deletion of Osano

Comment: being promotional isn't a reason to delete per se. Of the four sources currently in the article, Crunchbase is not reliable and the BusinessWire one is simply a press release. However, the Techcrunch and Business Insider articles are substantial pieces, and the publishers are at least not ''obviously'' unreliable. And then there's a lot of coverage in what look to me like 'semi-reliable' online business and techy publications such as http://www.siliconhillsnews.com/2019/10/25/complying-with-data-privacy-laws-may-not-be-sexy-but-austin-based-osano-says-its-a-billion-dollar-business/https://www.informationweek.com/big-data/big-data-analytics/data-privacy-transparency-get-new-weapon/d/d-id/1334465https://xconomy.com/texas/2019/06/19/big-business-has-your-data-and-osano-is-rating-how-they-handle-it/ and https://www.komando.com/security-privacy/be-careful-these-major-companies-are-not-protecting-your-personal-data/574428/. Taken together, I think there's enough to meet  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:GNG)

Comment: I am unable to locate any |significant coverage with |in-depth information on the company and containing |independent content, fails GNG/. The https://www.statesman.com/business/20191024/austins-osano-aims-to-reshape-data-privacy-field Statesman, https://techcrunch.com/2019/10/03/osano-risk-compliance-battlefield/ Techcrunch, https://www.businessinsider.com/osano-pitch-deck-2019-3 Business Insider, https://www.informationweek.com/big-data/big-data-analytics/data-privacy-transparency-get-new-weapon/d/d-id/1334465 Information Week, http://www.siliconhillsnews.com/2019/10/25/complying-with-data-privacy-laws-may-not-be-sexy-but-austin-based-osano-says-its-a-billion-dollar-business/ Silicon Hills references are all churnalism and rely almost entirely interviews and/or information provided by the company, failing . This is a young company spending marketing $$ on PR and these articles are examples of the marketing dept doing their job, nothing more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: From : ''Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.'' None of those references contains Independent Content
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND)