Deletion of Evaluative diversity

Comment: irredeemably violates . This is not a question of "needing additional coverage", it is that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: I have dramatically reduced the article and cited additional sources to address concerns that  is too pervasive to work through. If there are additional concerns about OR in this version, it should be easier to specify the particular issues to fix, and perhaps we can '''Userfy''' the article and address them there. If people think this topic should appear under a different title (e.g., "Moral diversity") that is another option (currently, "Moral diversity" redirects to this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I've seen this topic pop up at other boards on occasion, but it I haven't ever seen a case that really establishes its . In addition to the original research, self promotion, and other concerns that came along with it, it seems best to just delete it and let someone else write it up if something does become notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Oh my. This is classic . This is not what Wikipedia articles are for. Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)