Deletion of Larry Givens

Comment: I have no problems with a Wikipedia article on such a boxer but Larry Givens does not fulfill the requirements of |notability and Wikipedia:Notability (people). His record is mediocre but I can't find any independent verification (apart from the google hits on his record and Wikipedia itself) that he was remarkably bad enough to be notable. In fact, several boxers listed in Tomato Can has even worse records than Givens. Eddie "the Eagle" Edwards|Eddie Edwards and Maurice Flitcroft all have notable articles about them in prestigious reliable sources that fulfills  requirements - I cannot find any such sources for Larry Givens - failing . He is not "bad" enough to be notable so to speak. The amended article then goes on to call him a Tomato Can - an un-sourced insulting term failing . The article fails a lot of Wikipedia policies as to be a borderline attack article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:BLP)

Comment: No doubt its his record is bad, but the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is '''verifiability, not truth.'''- from Wikipedia:Verifiability: ''"Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.'' Calling him a Tomato Can without an independent |reliable citation backing it up based on a simple boxing record is simply |originial research on your part. It also stomps all over Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. I cannot find any independent reliable source that cites him as a boxer exceptionally bad enough to warrant an article in Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOR)