Deletion of Shannon Lark

Comment: appears almost totally unnotable" is a statement at odds with |research in |reliable sources, as she does indeed have |extensive genre coverage. And a film not having articles means either '''A.''' no one has written the article yet, or '''B.''' someone did and the film proved non-notable.  So while it would seem that Ms. Lark would be hard pressed to meet , the article is not asserting that such is her claim to notablity.  The assertions for (genre) notability is for her being a spokesmodel and scream queen... and THAT assertion seems to be easily verifiable... and she does have coverage in multiple sources for the last eleven years.http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2011&q=%22Shannon+Lark%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Shannon+Lark%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go  Strange assertion, sure... as it does not rank up there with the "glory" of being an Oscar or Nobel prize winner... but as an assertion it meets the GNG and passes . Even a minor notability, and even in a genre field, can meet guideline, and be notability none-the-less
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ENT||WP:BIO)

Comment: Clearly fails the requirements of  and . The entry is clearly self-promotional, violating , , and , and is the work of at least three previously identified  accounts.  One of the accounts was blocked twice for its self-promotional edits to the entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stitchworker
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:AUTHOR||WP:AUTO||WP:SPAM||WP:COI||WP:SPA)

Comment: coverage in  meets . COI editing is not, by itself, grounds for the deletion of notable material, nor is purported failure to satisfy the requirements of a specific notability guideline, when the standards of the general notability guideline are met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG)