Deletion of Kira Takenouchi (2nd nomination)

Comment: Publishers Weekly is not fan blog or her own company. That said, a single news article does not make notability. So it's to  that we need to look. A spot check of a three of her titles finds nothing in the way of reviews and, in fact, hardly any bookseller listings, which does not give one the warm fuzzies. (Nor does an ISBN format that indicates a very small press indeed, but notability does not come from the size of the publisher, but the notice it gets.) I need to finish checking the rest, but it's not looking like she's notable as an author
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Does not appear to meet  or . Material by individual does not apparently meet  either. The claim made by the repeated commentator that a publication inherits notability by having an occasional interview with a notable individual is simply wrong. We do not have multiple, independent reliable sources for this individual. We do not have other reasons to consider the individual notable. Note to the repeated commentator: No one is claiming that you personally have constructed these other websites: the point is that regardless of who made them, they are functionally equivalent to personal websites: they lack either reliablity or notability in their material and opinions. If this individual does become notable or if these websites become more reliable or their awards become notable then we can reconsider. Until that occurs, we don't have much choice here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:CREATIVE||WP:BOOKS)

Comment: just does not have any significant coverage and fails . Agree with the BLP concerns that there is little referenceable information and as such, it should be redeleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: It's been confirmed that the article's creator {{user|Kxings}} was indefinitely blocked a year ago under the account {{user|Kxing}} for repeatedly recreating this and other related articles. I'll leave it to others if this now qualifies for #G5|CSD G5
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)