Deletion of The Wild Wild Westmar Show

Comment: Listening to the show could not tell me if it were notable.  It might tell me that I think it's excellent, but it doesn't tell me anything at all about its notability or significance.  There are plenty of talented people and great ideas that don't get the attention some of their less good brethren do.  I watched for some time as others brought up the same concerns and you dismissed them without addressing them.  I hoped you would provide more, but when you did not provide anything to |verify your claims, deleted the tags that would have encouraged others to work onthe issues, and I couldn't find anything myself, there weren't many other routes to go.  If there is evidence to verify the show's notability - even its national syndication over the air if coverage is truly significant, then personally I'd be inclined to change my mind
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per , , also apparently a  case (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist&diff=prev&oldid=163247202 this edit).  As far as I can tell, we don't even have an article on the station this show runs on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:COI)

Comment: the article cites nothing to establish notability that meets the requirements of the |Notability Guideline. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?num=100&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&um=1&ie=ISO-8859-1&tab=wn&q=%22Wild+Wild+Westmar%22+wikipedia Zero hits when I searched Google News and Google News Archive. Since Google tracks http://news.google.com/intl/en_us/about_google_news.html 4500 different news media sources, this show seems to be flying under the radar. If someone digs up something that fixes this, then I'm certainly willing to change my "delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NN)