Deletion of Ferris Bueller's Day Off in popular culture

Comment: this movie is extremely culturally significant, that's why its been parodied so many times. I don't see how  applies to it (personally I think that rule should be overturned anyway, it makes no sense at all, its only purpose is to support the deletionists' agenda
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: no merge) This isn't just "miscellaneous information", it's outright trivia.  The collection here is not related to the movie at all as its just a collection of random facts and snippets that violate  which states ''Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous facts.'' and goes on to state ''A better way to organize an article is to provide a logical grouping and ordering of facts that gives an integrated presentation, providing context and smooth transitions, whether in text, list, or table.'' The parent article is already well-developed so it doesn't need the trivia section to suggest further developments, and none of these actually would help the article since they aren't related to the subject matter. It wouldn't need more than a passing mention in the main article that states the obvious (is: FBDO has recieved numerous mentions in popular culture). This collection also violates  in that the spinoff subject isn't |notable in its own right as the topic (the film's appearance in popular culture hasn't recieved significant coverage in third-party sources.  As it stands, this article contains ''no citations'' so even if it was about a notable subject (which it is not) it could be deleted as a |synthesis.  Overall, this is a |orignal research about a |nonnotable topic which goes against the |trivia guidelines.  This can't be fixed by cleanup as even a well-cited article on this subject would fail  and , so the only viable option is to delete it.  A one sentence mention (without any specific examples to encourage its reformation) in the parent article is sufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:TRIVIA||WP:N||WP:N||WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:TRIVIA||WP:TRIVIA||WP:N)

Comment: as otability|non-trivial information |verified in |reliable sources, which means it is unoriginal research.  This discriminate list is presented in a non-directory manner.  No reason beyond trumped up versions of  has presented for deletion.  A true reading of policies and guidelines would suggest we keep this article.  And in any case, as it is interesting, useful, discriminate, and relevant to many readers and editors, we can always |ignore all rules as it is far more important that we retain information our ditors matter|editors come here to edit than adhere to every last word written on some obscure and ever changing guideline written by a minority of our community.  Moreover, obviously readers and editors well beyond the handful commenting in this snapshot in time discussion come here looking for this information.  There is absolutely no valid reason whatsoever why we would not at worst redirect with edit history intact.  One could perhaps make a case for a merge, but there is no real reason beyond an  to not try something else per  and .  Finally, I am beginning a significant http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ferris_Bueller%27s_Day_Off_in_popular_culture&diff=281737840&oldid=281621658 revision that addresses and nullifies many of the concerns expressed above by reworking the article to not simply be a list, but rather a discussion on its reception in popular culture that will focus on secondary source analysis.  Sincerely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:IAR||WP:E||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: no indication that "Ferris Bueller's Day Off in popular culture" is the subject of |reliable sources and the article as it exists is a trivial repository for everything that in the |unsourced opinion of any editor who stumbles across it is similar to FBDO. Strongly oppose merging any of this material to the film's article per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:OR||WP:OR||WP:TRIVIA)

Comment: I would strongly suggest to the nominator to use a merge tag next time.  The first edit of the nominator in this article was the nomination for deletion, in violation of .  Articles for Deletion by their very nature often tend to be contentious and adversarial, making editors choose stark opposing sides, so the opportunity for comprimise is harder in such a forum
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: per , which opposes "Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics".  This is a list of items whose only relationships with each other is referencing a film.  None of these items are "famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic"; they have their own fame and do not get any kind of boost for referencing ''Ferris Bueller's Day Off''.  Like other editors said, it is straightforward trivia.  If anyone can find significant coverage from reliable sources about how the film has made its mark in popular culture, please include it at the film article itself since that article is not lacking space.  Unless that article grows to 100+ KB, there is zero need to have this sub-topic floating around in its own mess of an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)