Deletion of List of SR West Country Class locomotives

Comment: The lists aren't |notable enough to form a separate article, but should be included in the articles about the relevant locomotive classes. There are usually multiple reference books that list this data and these should of course be added as properly |cited references. The information in the tables is highly relevant for those engaged in historical study not just of the locomotives themselves but also the wider social and historical impact of railways. The history of technical development, adoption and obsolescence is told directly in this data. Locomotive tables are common practice in a large number of the locomotive-class articles. Redirects are not needed because these are unlikely search terms
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CITE)

Comment: List of SR Lord Nelson Class Locomotives should be nominated under  not AFD.&nbsp;&ndash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:RFD)

Comment: All right, I'm a fan of history, don't get me wrong. But I do not understand the significance of this article. If I have it right, and I think I do, this is just a list of trains that ran from the 1940s -1960s. I'm not sure where they ran as the article does not specify, but it's safe to say that they were used at some point. Am I missing something, or is that really the point of the article? Isn't that comparable to having a list of Boeing 747s used during the 1980s? I don't see the need for this type of information. None of it can be properly sourced, thus it cannot be |verified. Also, as it is not sourced, |notability cannot be asserted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFIABILITY||WP:NOTABILITY)