Deletion of Chiyo Miyako (2nd nomination)

Comment: I have only been active in Wikipedia for a very short time, and I am already very tired of being bombarded with AfDs for supercentenarians. It is possible to show that some have received significant, sustained coverage in reliable sources, while others have not (and therefore that some meet  and some don't). It does not seem to me that the nominators of these AfDs do much , and the rate at which these articles are being nominated makes it very difficult to research each to determine whether there is other information and other sources which have not yet been included in the articles. Some of the "keep" articles may not be policy-based, but many of the "delete" arguments are based on the quality of the article as it stands, and the fact that there is no notability guideline on extreme age, rather than assessing whether "many sources exist, but simply have not been included yet." 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BEFORE||WP:PAGEDECIDE)

Comment: Article was nominated for deletion just two months ago and the result was "Keep", no reason to think otherwise as nothing has changed since then. Oldest person in the world, reaching the age of 117 that little can imagine to reach. I also note that the users voting for "Delete" were the same last time round as this time round, which does not seem to be the "consensus" that Wikipedia aims to achieve. Besides certain recurring characters always voting to delete, consensus of the general community seem to be to keep this article, as per the previous nomination. Also meets  clearly, reported extensively not only in her native Japan, but all over the world in other languages. Not a case of , coverage outside routine coverage is present. I offer an example http://www.m-review.co.jp/files/tachiyomi_J0038_1105_0012-0015.pdf, an interview of Ms Miyako due to the interest of the general population in her longevity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)