Deletion of James Gordon Jr.

Comment: I have revised the article and added RS sources.  Many arguments at the AfD are based on the present state and sourcing of the article.  AfD is not for article clean up however.  Per  It is sufficient to provide credible evidence that significant coverage in independent sources exist, which I have done. I don't have to show or prove anything to anybody.  In theory at least, if due process is followed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of Batman Family adversaries#Mobsters and plainclothes criminals where there is already a writeup on the character -  says fictional characters must meet  and this character has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources - all the references in the article are to comic books, which are primary sources for the character (
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARY)

Comment: It's a pretty awful AfD nomination. Egregious violation of .  Took a look at the AfD nominee's edit activity.  PRODed one article https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=He_Yamin&diff=prev&oldid=915472041 at 14:14.  Then four minutes later took this article to AfD at 14:18, confidently stating "'''No hint of any impact, reception, influences, etc.'''". Again, four minutes later, took yet another article rticles for deletion/Matsuya (department store) to AfD at 14:22, which was rather quickly thrown out as an absolutely baseless crappy nomination.  Same with this one.  Should be thrown out.  Did nominee test any of the fancy links his automated script offers, as a matter of ''routine'' .  Try for instance GScholar.  I myself was pretty surprised that Google Scholar https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22James+Gordon%22+batman&btnG=  offers peer reviewed articles on a figure from the Batman universe, for instance from '' International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior'' https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJOTB-17-03-2014-B005/full/html. Holy cow.  There are many more.  What a lousy nomination.  I'm glad I left Wikipedia years ago. Too many frustrations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP: A||WP:BEFORE)