Deletion of Norman Lapidus

Comment: An article with no meaningful claim of notability, with minimal sourcing in the article and little more to be found in the search required by . Being a mere councilmember is an insufficient claim of notability, unlike being a mayor or being elected to countywide office. Nor is there a logical merge target that might have been considered as an alternative to deletion. I'm sure that all of these considerations are taken into account in *ALL* articles nominated and that we aren't nominating articles for deletion out of pure spite. But in this case there is rare agreement. If only that might one day be reciprocated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Smalltown municipal councillors are not entitled to an automatic presumption of notability under  just because they exist, but there's no evidence of enough |reliable source coverage to get him over  #2 as being significantly more notable than the norm
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:NPOL)