Deletion of LiveCode

Comment: I have added supporting citations from established tech publications to the article and modified the tone for a |neutral point of view. Bibliographic citations have been added. External links significantly expanded to include a sample of reviews, tutorials, support sites, and third party frameworks. Two claims in the main body of the article still require citations; citation needed templates added. Further comments appreciated regarding this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per the sufficient coverage in |reliable sources. LiveCode (formerly known as "Revolution") has received paragraphs of coverage in http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/27/revolution_runtime/ this article from ''The Register''. It has received http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.20/20.05/RuntimeRevolution/index.html an in-depth review from MacTech. Both of these sources are reliable and independent of the subject. They are enough to allow LiveCode to pass Wikipedia:Notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The Scotsman (major UK broadsheet newspaper), The Register, MacWorld, MacNN, Network World and PCWorld are all valid independent news organizations which do meet the criteria for notability under Wikipedia |notability guidelines. Specifically they are valid as reliable sources, for demonstrating significant coverage and as independent sources. These sources do provide critical analysis, for example the platform won the Annual Editor's Choice award from MacWorld in 2004. When measuring against these criteria I count 10 of the 14 references as meeting the criteria - as specified on the Wikipedia notability page. There are two books, one of which is out of print (being in print is not a requirement for notability) and the other of which is linked in the Bibliography - Programming for Dummies, which extensively covers the platform. There is  a link to one of the University Courses where the platform is taught. I have added a link to a paper given on the language to the WWW 2009 conference which is another valid source as the paper was invited by the conference committee
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)