Deletion of Tees railway viaduct

Comment: I've added a couple of refs and there are more out there on Bouch and his bridge. The article really just needs some refs added for the modern proposal for a pedestrian bridge on the site. (That aside, I really don't think any article should get to AfD a mere 2 mins after its creation. Apart from etiquette, that is not long enough for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (:WP:BEFORE)

Comment: this is a good faith nomination; it's obviously hard to find sources for this, and we can't judge the |notability it will have in the future.  The caution isn't as needed as for CSD because there are plenty of us weighing in, so the process works.  It also seems that there ''are'' some sources, and I say let's see what evolves from them.  I doubt it will be much if that bridge isn't built, but give it time to tell
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The nomination suggests merger.  It also seems overly hasty, contrary to .  Sources are, of course, available such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6TNPAAAAYAAJ The North Eastern Railway: its rise and development
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)