Deletion of Grace Clawson (2nd nomination)

Comment: fails , . Happy for a redirect to the appropriate list, but we should delete the history first
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: The article is not about an event and so  is irrelevant.  The problem with access to sources like the ''Chicago Tribune'' is due to the GDPR which is irrelevant too.  Coverage in such newspapers is adequate evidence to pass  and so we're good
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: No evidence of the type of coverage that would be sufficient to meet . There's nothing here of encyclopedic value that couldn't be reproduced effectively on one of the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: or '''Redirect''' to appropriate list per  and . Take out the original research about how someone was older but now isn't recognised and you're left with the bare basics of born, worked, moved to Canada then the US, had kids and then died. Easily handled on a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE||WP:PERMASTUB)