Deletion of Foundr

Comment: I've examined every source cited on the page (including the two from Huff Post and the one from Forbes), and every single one is either a mirroring of a press release from the company, or a transcript or summary of an interview with the company founder. (The Forbes source is such an interview.) And reading them one after another, there is an odd repetitiveness, with each saying very similar things, that always trace back to material released by the company. I've also run multiple searches on various platforms for other sources, and found nothing more of any significance (including a lot of false returns for misspellings of "founder"). I'm just not seeing independent interest at the level that we need here (although I suspect that there probably will be sometime in the future). And to reply to the one "keep" comment above, Wikipedia obviously does not "review" companies. So this is a clear "delete" for me on notability grounds. Please indulge me one more thing: I know full well that  is an invalid argument – but the origin of the page is described https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/296187 here, and I don't like it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Doesn't meet  at the moment. The HuffPo and Forbes sources are all contributor written which lack editorial control and are therefore not RS in our eyes. Many of us are aware that these pieces are easily bought via freelancing sites in an attempt to confer notability here, thus they can't truly be independent either. The http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/you-don-t-need-a-background-just-be-hungry-how-to-be-a-successful-ceo-117022400434_1.html Business Standard article is ok but it is brief and more about the founder than the actual magazine. Even if it were about the company, a single source is not enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)