Deletion of SK Foods

Comment: per nom.  I can't find anything regarding reliable sources about the company itself, saving some insignificant news items about some people associated with it.  Clear  issue, no reason to exist otherwise
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: spaced ndash}} The topic has received significant coverage other than about the price-fixing and racketeering charges and conviction of its owner. The topic passes . Here's some sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As of this timestamp, the article bears no resemblance to the page nominated for deletion. Several editors have performed rescue work sufficient for me to offer a keep assertion. I'll concede that some of the sources linked tend to cover Salyer more than the company, but sourcing applied since nomination puts this business well past CORP and certainly past GNG. Per , an article on the BLP is not appropriate, but an article on the organization is. I tend to concur with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: Passes WP:GNG and WP:CORP. I reject the idea that because the available sources are primarily about the scandal a company has evidently perpetrated that those sources aren't also "about the company". What, do people want to rename the article to something like "The SK Foods bribery and price collusion scandal"? If a company comes to the attention of the media for its alleged crimes that's just as notable as if it were to come to the attention of the media for its takeover bids, its product innovations, or any other result of its business decisions and activities. It's ''all'' about the company, imo. Re Dennis'  suggestion, I can't see that, either. The relevant passage would seem to be, "Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia." I ''don't'' see this as "routine news", and I ''do'' see it as beyond the importance and inherent interest of "most newsworthy events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: per nom and per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)