Deletion of 2011 UCLA racism controversy

Comment: per . Even though this incident has been covered by numerous media outlets, I don't see how it will have enduring historical significance. In substance, the incident is nothing more than an example of a person's expression of constitutionally-protected free speech
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: this third lame article on this filler "news" story.  for those of you who like links. Salt this one like bar fries
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Content should be moved to article Ching chong and/or Internet vigilantism. Otherwise, article should be deleted per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . WP already deleted the article on the student, this is the same thing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Already deleted several times under the student's name, it's definitely  and didn't really get any reporting at all nationally. Stop |gaming the system by putting it under different titles and realize there's not anything compelling here to speak of beyond somebody who got their just desserts for what they said
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:GAME)