Deletion of Akira Fujimoto

Comment: per LWG. In fact this article could be speedy deleted per #A7, as the only claim of notability – "''the first commercially feasible rendering software system called ARTS (Accelerated Ray Tracing System)''" – (if true at all) should have been reported in Accelerated Ray Tracing System article (which currently doesn't exist), and claim of the subject's notability can be found in this article. —&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD)

Comment: have to agree, the subject does not look like it meets . An |interesting fellow, maybe, but not notable by Wikipedia standards. Would also not seem to meet  as an expert in his field, though the original author contends this criteria should not be applied. Given the company itself has not been considered notable enough for it's own article, this serves as the article covering both the company and its founder. As such, if the company itself was notable, we could propose an article covering it instead, with a section on its founder and redirect this article there. But I can't find anything that would suggest the company meets  to the extent where it would warrant its own article. Could perhaps userfy to allow
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:INTERESTING||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:CORPDEPTH)