Deletion of Lawson Software

Comment: several reliable sources from ''New York Times'' http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/29/business/lawson-software-says-oracle-and-peoplesoft-are-its-major-rivals.html (about an antitrust testimony), ''Wall Street Journal'' http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/12/19/oops-new-york-times-deal-leaked-by-accident/ (about a leaked sale), ''Star Tribune'' (http://www.startribune.com/business/125538613.html about a layoff), an http://www.enterpriseirregulars.com/34033/lawson-software-%E2%80%94-a-very-sad-ending/ interesting blog post about the business Lawson and others are involved in, and others. It's a company in a fairly wide-encompassing industry (up there with Oracle Corporation|Oracle and PeopleSoft). Most business news is from press releases and reactions to them by journalists/bloggers anyway. Also,  is an essay, not a Wikipedia policy. Sure, the references on Lawson Software need some work but at least it ''has'' references, unlike most pages about obscure :category:footballers|footballers, :category:musical groups|music groupss, and :category:organisms|organisms... &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B)

Comment: per : the only reliable source in the article in InformationWeek's article, which speculates the future events basing off the press release. The Forbes references are not related to the software house, so they don't count. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:B2B)