Deletion of Employsure (2nd nomination)

Comment: Wow, quite a large number of low-edit contributors at this AfD. And one has been blocked already for socking. Welcome! I've looked at each of the references and like {{u|AntiCompositeNumber}} says above, none meet the criteria for establishing notability. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per  is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include ''original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject''. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Per HighKing, Bori, and Nom. I have additionally done my |own research and not one thing that I can find convinces me that this company meets |the notability guideline for corporations or |the GNG. Per Coolabahapple, it does possibly warrant being skinned and merged to Peninsula Business Services, however on the surface of it that organisation appears of somewhat dubious notability as well (although I have done not one bit of research beyond a glance at the current sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:NCORP||WP:GNG)