Deletion of Peter Orullian (2nd nomination)

Comment: We need to be careful about mechanically applying standards like "blog coverage doesn't establish notability" in fields like f/sf, which have a long and recognized tradition of "amateur" publishing by professional writers and recognized commentators. Coverage in John Scalzi's blog, for example, (Scalzi is president of SFWA) probably would contribute to notability. More generally, while blog coverage can't normally be used to source biographical details, especially in BLPs, it can be used to demonstrate peer recognition/reputation under , which quite clearly would demonstrate notability. We have to be careful, of course, about walled gardens, indiscriminate backpatting, and purely promotional comments about friends, but that's routine editorial judgment
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: He does not meet the notability criteria right now.  He may in the future, so the |future is when the article should be created.  An alternative is to userfy the article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)