Deletion of TheOdd1sOut (2nd nomination)

Comment: Or draft it if needed. The subject does meet |notability guidelines, being covered by http://rare.us/rare-humor/a-youtuber-decided-to-buy-3-million-sprinkles-and-did-what-any-self-respecting-adult-would-with-all-that-power/ Rare, https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/new-can-t-catch-harry-card-game-from-odd-1s-out-surpasses-quarter-million-dollars-as-campaign-enters-final-days-on-kickstarter-1027685678 Market Insider, https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/bookselling/article/77731-this-week-s-bestsellers-august-13-2018.html Publisher's Weekly, http://collider.com/youtube-animators/#theodd1sout Collider (reliable?), https://culturess.com/2018/08/18/10-hilarious-web-comic-artists-you-should-check-out-asap/ Fansided, https://slate.com/technology/2018/04/youtubers-are-reading-their-own-fan-fiction-awkward.html?via=gdpr-consent Slate, not to mention the coverage of the most recent YouTube Rewind which he took part in. Notability is there, though the article doesn't look particularly good, what with all the unreliable and primary sources. Certainly not a speedy situation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I haven't commented on the sources/this passing  since I nominated this as a technical  deletion, but suffice to say I think  still applies without any significant improvement to the sourcing that would get it past . I have no idea how you'd close this one, so good luck to the closer
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:G4||WP:G4||WP:GNG)

Comment: per above. The subject does meet |notability guidelines, and the sources are good
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)