Deletion of March 23, 2004

Comment: I'm still concerned, though, that all this AFD will accomplish if a Delete decision is made is removing this single article. There's still a full category of individual day articles, which based on volume alone places this into a different category that . Is it possible to do a mass nomination of so many articles? The March 2004 example is definitely the way to go on this - ''but what is the policy'' or is there even a policy regarding this sort of thing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: keeping those for the months of the form "XXXXXX 2004". We have been going through a boatload of deletion discussions of redirects of specific dates at fD; I'd recommend going through there (the latest set is in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 May 3; the original set with the justifications for deletion is in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 April 19
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: I went back and forth on this. There are several categories (Category: Days in 2003 and Category:Days in 2004) that are filled with nothing but pages like this. Is this an instance of ? Maybe. But I think that the sheer number of pages of this type mean that this one can stay too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)