Deletion of Alodia Gosiengfiao (2nd nomination)

Comment: on the grounds that it passed AFD with a pretty convincing keep decision only a few months ago. Please bear in mind  is not valid rationale for nominating an article. There is an appeals process out there if you really feel strongly that this article doesn't belong, but on May 7 it was kept after undergoing the AFD process and for AFD to remain viable articles that are kept cannot be re-nominated after such a short interval in order to get a desired result. I know there's the whole "consensus can change" argument that is addressed at , however I don't believe consensus can change in only a few months
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:NOTAGAIN)

Comment: not remotely notable, no  http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22Alodia+Gosiengfiao%22&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=uk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)