Deletion of Atta Elayyan

Comment: This is the saddest/one of the most difficult delete !votes I've ever cast, but unfortunately the deceased would not have been notable enough for an article last week. Delete per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: changed from delete). I am sympathetic to any national representative, as I consider it being covered under  “participated in a major amateur or professional competition”. However, I would like to see some solid coverage from before his death. I can not find any, will flip quickly if some is found
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: Wasn't notable before he was one of 50 killed in a mass shooting, isn't notable after. Futsal players have to meet  and the lack of sources pre death are what should apply not the tributes after
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: although I have BLP reservations in case his family requests the article be deleted. There is coverage before the massacre - see https://www.cio.co.nz/article/635193/cio100-2018-31-100-atta-elayyan-lwa-solutions/ http://www.uce.canterbury.ac.nz/blog/young-entrepreneur-series-atta.shtml. He was New Zealand Football's futsal "player of the year" https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/64105645/null, and has been described as a great goalkeeper http://websites.sportstg.com/get_file.cgi?id=2782264. All of these refs are from before the mass shootings, and when combined with the newer refs with greater coverage,  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: named in the New Zealand CIO100 two years in a row; he had notability before his death. In depth coverage of that, plus coverage of him being NZ Futsal Player of the Year = multiple published independent sources =  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: notable before the shooting; notable after. Meets , IMHO. Definite keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It pains me to argue against this, but of the sources provided in this discussion so far, only the CIO write-up ''might'' pass . The Canterbury article is an interview with an alumnus, the "player of the year" mention was a sentence in routine sports coverage, the "great goalkeeper" mention was in the league's media guide, the Idealog article only quoted him for a couple grafs halfway down the article and isn't sigcov. The other sources are medium articles, tweets, or links to Youtube. I understand the sentiment is to keep this, but I'm mostly posting this if someone were to take a look at this AfD after the fact. An article on him would have been deleted a week ago without thought
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)