Deletion of Emily Schooley (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article seems likely to have been created by a  based on the history of the creator but that is not necessarily a reason to delete it. Neither is the fact that there was an AfD several years ago - a subject can become notable over time. However, this subject seems to easily fail  with insignificant roles, and there do not seem to be any  that establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:NACTOR||WP:RS)

Comment: It is not unusual for a subject to gain notability over the course of 4 years, which was when the previous AfD took place. 12k Google hits https://www.google.com/search?as_eq=wikipedia&q=%22Emily+Schooley%22&num=50 is not "nothing", and the nominator does not explain why they find the 25+ sources already in the article insufficient to meet . Overall this appears to be an embarrassingly ill-considered nomination by {{u|Winner 42}}, who probably should exercise more diligence in the future
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)