Deletion of Todd May

Comment: He appears to have once held a named chair (McDevitt Chair in Religious Philosophy) of Le Moyne College https://www.lemoyne.edu/Academics/Colleges-Schools-Centers/McDevitt-Center/McDevitt-People, therefore possibly satisfies  #5.  He is also Class of 1941 Memorial Professor of the Humanities at Clemson University http://www.clemson.edu/caah/departments/philosophy-religion/people/facultyBio.html?id=386. His books are also reviewed in major publications, for example, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/review-fragile-life-accepting-our-vulnerability-todd-may Times Higher Education, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/jun/13/death-todd-may-review The Guardian, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/matters-large-and-small-reading-todd-mays-a-fragile-life-in-the-wake-of-hurricane-harvey/#! LA Reviews of Books (this is in addition to specialist review publications, e.g. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2653480?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents, http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/Death-book-by-Todd-May.php), therefore may qualify under  #3.  There are also interviews and discussion http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-13/why-avoiding-pain-can-cause-more-harm-than-good/8790432 ABC, https://www.believermag.com/exclusives/?read=interview_may Believer, and his work quoted and discussed in books (e.g. https://books.google.com/books?id=4NlFDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA103&dq=todd+may#v=onepage&q=todd%20may&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=YBDIBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA37&dq=todd+may#v=onepage&q=todd%20may&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=Zx8BDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA27&dq=todd+may#v=onepage&q=todd%20may&f=false, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DTirBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA393&dq=todd#v=onepage&q=todd&f=false, https://books.google.com/books?id=JHyQBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA115&dq=todd+may#v=onepage&q=todd%20may&f=false, among too many to list here). He therefore possibly satisfies  #1. He has written opinion pieces for https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/author/todd-may/ New York Times. I believe he is notable enough based on a few different notability criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: Are we working with any biographical secondary sources? Because if so, I haven't seen them, nevertheless enough to write a biographical article that does justice to the topic. None of his book reviews go into enough depth to even describe his writing career. To review the above links, the ''THE'' and ''The Guardian'' reviews are both hopelessly short, leaving the ''LA Rev of Books'' piece. As I said months ago, ''The Political Philosophy of Poststructuralist Anarchism'', which is supposed to be his standout work, was only reviewed in ''Ethics'' (philosophy journal) and ''Choice'' (very brief listings for librarian purchase recommendations): it isn't |independently notable. And his other books did not receive many major reviews. The Google Books links have little substance on May apart from repeating what he said, e.g., even in the first link of the group, which has the longest relevance, there is no analysis and only recitation. I'd welcome other sources, especially if they are offline or in languages other than English. I would support restoring the redirect to Post-anarchism#Approaches, which is another mess but at least cites a secondary source in May's relation to "poststructuralist anarchism", the work for which he is best known, but since that single-sentence mention serves little function in the article, I'd also back the nom's rationale to delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I redirected the article due to the sourcing issues. Due to the commonality of his name, it is difficult to find sources which are about him specifically.  However, I didn't go to AfD due to his citation count, which in my opinion clearly meets . Although, with the current sourcing I wouldn't mind redirecting (obviously, since I did), without any issue with recreation, once reliable sourcing is included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOLAR)

Comment: I nominated this article, but have been convinced that the topic meets  #3 and  #1, based on reviews of his work. Even if the article briefly discusses him and is mostly about his academic work, such an article would appear to be well within Wikipedia's content guidelines based on the sources above. I am still not convinced that the subject meets , but rather that he qualifies on subject specific notability criteria alone (which is allowed per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)