Deletion of D. Kodikara

Comment: per Blue Square Thing. Another virtually empty article based on bare statistics, with sourcing so poor that the person's name cannot be even be determined. The only sources are statistics aggregators CricInfo and CricketArchive, which have been shown not to be independent of each other in the sense that one copies content extensively from the other (or in both directions), and which have been proven to have non-negligible rates of error. These are not good enough for the biography of a presumably |living person. I'd support a merger of these raw stats to a suitable list article, but I'm not sure if there is one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Passes  as a cricketer who has appeared in first-class cricket. This confers a presumption of notability on him. Further sources may be difficult for this WP to find as they are likely not to be in English, but there is no reason to suppose that they do not exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: Established to have passed  and thus notable. And a {{tl|trout}} to the nominator for blatantly disregarding how the notability standards for sportspeople work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIN)

Comment: Like the others. I do not understand what all the fuss is all about. It is already understood you can not supercede the |general notability guideline like it does not exist. Surely, a source of raw statistics does not satisfy the indepth coverage we need nor is it appropriate to depend on for a |BLP. If there was anything, and I mean ''anything'', that demonstrates this person was covered adequately and I somehow missed it, I would probably !vote keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP)