Deletion of Criminal procedure in California

Comment: No source provided does not equal . Notability is not determined by the absence of sources in the article, but by their absence in a search per . A quick look in Google Books clearly shows many sources - https://www.google.com/search?q=Criminal+procedure+in+California&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHnbPo0ILbAhUkI8AKHYq0AV0Q_AUIECgB&biw=1771&bih=772, the subject is therefore notable. The question is therefore if it is OR, and there is no indication that it is by a quick glance at some of the sites in a search https://www.google.com/search?q=Criminal+procedure+in+California&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWgbH10YLbAhUqKMAKHdLqBmY4ChD8BQgJKAA&biw=1771&bih=772&dpr=1, and it has not been shown to be be so. It is possible there may be omissions and errors when examined closely, but these can be fixed if present
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NEXIST)

Comment: this long, well formed |essay about a subject whose |notability is entirely unsupported by |sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY||WP:NLAW||WP:RS)