Deletion of Prairie Muffins

Comment: While the circumstances under which this AfD came about may be suboptimal, it's factually accurate & correct in its application of policy. A http://news.google.com/news?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a&tab=wn&q=%22Prairie+Muffins%22&btnG=Search+News Google News search shows no news sources using the phrase. While my instinct is that this is a notable phenomenon, it doesn't appear that there are any |reliable sources with which to |cite references and make the article |verifiable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:V)

Comment: fails  and if the creator of the article CyberAnth is writing a book on the subject doesnt that mean this article is in violation of  too? &nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NOR)

Comment: Fails .  I could find no reliable sources for this.  A regular google search didn't show anything, so I tried searching some more topical sites, such as http://www.csmonitor.com/csmonitor/web/guest/search?q=Prairie+Muffin&btnG=Google+Search&results_num=1&entqr=0&output=xml_no_dtd&sort=date%3AD%3AL%3Ad1&ud=1&oe=null&ie=null&client=default_frontend&proxystylesheet=monitor_style&site=csmonitor The Christian Science Monitor and http://www.nheri.org/index.php?searchword=Prairie+Muffin&option=com_search&Itemid=5 National Home Education Research Institute.  I still drew a blank
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Forgot my other thought.  Perhaps the manifesto site itself meets  and we should make the article about the web site if consensus is to delete this page as is. I forget how all that alexa stuff works
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)