Deletion of YMF-X000A Dreadnought Gundam (2nd nomination)

Comment: Per nomination. As the article is unreferenced, there is no |verifiability, so there is no evidence that the fictional weapon meets the |general notability guideline or that it can be anything other than a |plot-only description of a fictional work. A quick |search engine test shows nothing to presume different
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:PLOT||WP:SET)

Comment: Fails . Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Notability issues as no references  and per above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article is not appropriate for Wikipedia.  mentions the idea of weapons lists in terms of games, but it really is good advice for all toys and fiction. In general, these end up being  style databases with very little context, and tend to run afoul of the same issue as PLOT. The spirit of policy calls for deleting this material, as does previous consensus at similar AFDs (see above). But if this is disputed, it might be worth further clarification (and discussion if necessary) at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:DIRECTORY||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:NOT)