Deletion of Atlantic-North Sea Continental Divide

Comment: Agree with the comments above.  This is |original research and , because this doesn't seem to have been a topic that has gotten scholarly attention.  Agree with Elmidae - there may well be a real drainage divide here, but until outside reliable sources have confirmed this name and written about it, it's beyond our purview to have an article on this subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Agree this is probably  but just as relevant is  and even  given the poor state of sourcing for this topic. Wikipedia editors cannot simply decide for themselves that an assembly of ranges amounts to a notable continental divide or watershed. Here in the UK no-one would think of referring to this feature as an Atlantic-North Sea divide, rather, we would refer to the ranges of hills and mountains that make up the watershed, which coincidentally is not even really an Atlantic-North Sea divide since the Irish sea and English channel receive a good portion of the water shed from it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: fails , clearly . Note to {{u|Sledbird}}: the validity of the concept isn't relative to this conversation in any way. Please limit your arguments to how this article meets the Wikipedia policies the nomination claims it fails. ( and ) Special:Contributions/174.254.193.199|174.254.193.199
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SYNTH||WP:RS||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . Clearly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: This seems like a pretty clear example of  to me - indeed, much clearer than the usual candidates for that deletion criterion, because the term is not even in use. Coining names for and describing components of putative geographical/geological features is ''not'' within WP's ambit - we wait until someone else has done so. This entire thing may be a reasonable consistent and defensible construct, but we are not the forum for it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)