Deletion of Holoxica Limited

Comment: For one, the article is clearly promotional and would take a fundamental re-write to not be. While I agree generally that AfDs aren't cleanup, you can still include something like  in an AfD that involves other reasons for deletions like lack of notability and the subject of the article is clearly not notable. On the sourcing, the first source is an interview with/about the founder. Which isn't neutral. Same could go for #6. The others either seem like trivial coverage (product releases and awards) or are dead links that sound by the titles as more of the same
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: As clearly |promotional. The only kind of coverage I can find (besides that described in the article by Adamant1) is further trivial mentions, nothing sufficient to substantiate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO)