Deletion of The Parker Pie Co.

Comment: In order to meet |Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, there needs to be '''significant''' coverage in independent |reliable sources.  The sources present in the article fails on being significant coverage.  The coverage I am available to find is local like http://bartonchronicle.com/parker-pie-plans-airport-expansion/ this.  Insufficient to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: The citation used in the article simply do not meet the standards of , being reviews, trivial mention or other similar articles. Further, travel guides do not confer notability because they are only directories of local attractions, a violation of ot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:N)

Comment: Sources offered in the article are basically routine coverage of opening a new location and some trivial mentions.  Searching Google books, however, turned up non-trivial mentions in travel guides (http://books.google.com/books?id=w4_yhWm7WxcC&pg=PA638&dq=%22The+Parker+Pie+Co.%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LErAU6aOFqKsjALGtICoAw&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22The%20Parker%20Pie%20Co.%22&f=false 1 and http://books.google.com/books?id=VH0hJlQe3e4C&pg=PA199&dq=%22The+Parker+Pie+Co.%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=LErAU6aOFqKsjALGtICoAw&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22The%20Parker%20Pie%20Co.%22&f=false 2).  These aren't wonderful source but I would accept them meeting our requirement for multiple reliable independent secondary sources per .  Since we decide notability based on available sources, not merely what's been cited, I !vote to keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)