Deletion of He Bowls To The Left

Comment: A couple of sentences in the Mitchell Johnson article would fit the exact same purpose. |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information – I'm sure I could construct a well-sourced, well-written article on Nicki Minaj's backside, but that doesn't mean it should be included on Wikipedai
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: seems to have sufficient coverage to pass . Of course, this means Waugh
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: into article on Mitchell Johnson. I agree that the chant is notable, but I don't see why it can't be a section of the article on Mitchell Johnson. GNG notes that the criteria it states "establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, that a subject is suitable for inclusion", and specifically mentions the guideline that |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Given this, I think that this information would be far better placed either in Johnson's article, or in a longer list of Barmy Army chants, with a mention at Johnson's article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)