Deletion of Ney v. Landmark Education Corp.

Comment: Agree that notability is borderline, but notable enough to merit a Washington Post article at the time.  I don't agree that sourcing is weak.  Everything significant in article can be found in the cited washington post or the Fourth Circuit opinions. I don't understand how this article purportedly runs afoul of   The misbehaviour of one of the editors who created strikes me as irrelevant to this discussion. Maybe the proposer will explain.  The inaccuracies referenced above should be corrected, but don't relate to the living person.  If an editor is concerned that a source is being misrepresented, he should look at the source, not have the article deleted.  (Not hard to do, it's in wikisources. I do agree that the case did not establish any significant legal precedent, and certainly doesn't meet the criteria in the  guideline, but many cases that don't fall within that guideline are notable for other reasons, as this one seems to be, and have articles here.  Guideline should probably be amended
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:CASES)

Comment: This is so not otability | notable, is terribly sourced, and seems a clear candidate as a atrack|coatrack.  On top of that the events in the case happened before the company's existence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CO)

Comment: WP:MILL|Run-of-the-mill district court case, setting no precedent. Yes, it was appealed, but the district court's judgment was s:Ney v. Landmark Education Corporation and Werner Erhard| affirmed in an unpublished opinion that cannot be cited as precedent. The fact that the Fourth Circuit designated the opinion as "Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States|unpublished" (i.e. "the court deems the case to have insufficient precedential value") is evidence of its unimportance. The sources indicate it got some news coverage, but ); the other sources appear to have axes to grind. Nothing to see here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)