Deletion of Philosophy of conspiracy theories

Comment: Clearly a  used for ing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: There is no branch of philosophy, |per sources, that is called "Philosophy of conspiracy theories." This is a blatantly  false claim. There's a plethora of work ''on'' conspiracy theories, in general or about particular ones, their origins, their effect on society and people, and so on. (The text looks like a student's paper, by the way, one of the avalanche of papers that are trying to find their way onto Wikipedia lately.) At best, this text needs to be '''draftified''' and get a serious make over
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: POVFORK/COATRACK as others have said. Any material on the "philosophy" of conspiracy theories should be included in the main Conspiracy theory article to make better sense in context, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: This is an |original essay not backed up by  sources. The narrative being spun is that there is some coherent group of "philosophers of conspiracy theories" when, instead, we simply have some philosophers who have written about conspiracy theories in various contexts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SECONDARY)