Deletion of The Kerberos Club

Comment: to Arc Dream Publishing (as I'd rather not vote to merge to an article that may be deleted shortly anyway). Frankly, even ''assuming'' that the two sources mentioned above are reliable (seemingly the two best available), that still leaves this article short of . Therefore, if one source is even questionable, then it falls far short
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: or '''merge''' to Arc Dream Publishing per above comments since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: to either Wild Talents (role-playing game), if that survives its own AFD, or Arc Dream Publishing if it does not.  Both reviews linked above (in the nomination and in Newimpartial's response) do not appear to be from reliable sources - the latter, for example, is a self-professed fan site.  My own searches, while coming up with a few more results, were similarly from non-reliable sources.  While I don't know the level of content that "Designers and Dragons" has covering this supplement, a single reliable source is generally not sufficient to pass the  as an independent article.  If Wild Talents (role-playing game) is not deleted during its own current AFD, then merging the information from this supplement would make sense.  If it is, then this could still be potentially Redirected to Arc Dream Publishing, which was its publisher
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)