Deletion of Klara Kedem

Comment: as article creator). I believe that the article is adequately sourced for its content and that, with Google scholar citation counts of 571, 307, 172, 122, etc she clearly passes #C1. The press story on her research into medieval writing helps make the article less dry but also makes a (weak) case for #C8 as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: as Eppstein etc. Nominator is advised to consult rof and efore before making further nominations in this area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:B)

Comment: it satisfies , but is it |verifiable? One of the -REASON|reasons for deletion is "thorough attempts to find Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources to Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify them have failed". Oddly, third-party sources are not explicitly mentioned, but  does say "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." In this article, there is a third-party source for the deciphering of handwritten medieval Hebrew. That is interesting, but is it enough
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:V||WP:DEL||WP:V)