Deletion of Mun Charn Wong

Comment: I agree with the nominator that this article doesn't meet the standard set out in . Absent the obituaries, there are really no reliable references to articles that are focussed on the subject. Incidentally, the bickering during this discussion has been pathetic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: To expand upon my initial reason for nominating the article for deletion, in the most recent edit summary the above listed reference was used to show how the subject of the article introduced his grandson to a notable musician.  However, knowing a notable person, or being related to a notable person does not make that person notable themselves. See #Invalid criteria and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: seems to be primarily a memorial and does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: passes  - significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Multiple obituaries in serious newspapers qualify
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per  I see nothing here that passes our standard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per Ash, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I do not believe the award from his employer constitutes a "notable award" to meet , and even if it did I still believe the article should be delted per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTNEWS)