Deletion of Kings Colony Shastripuram

Comment: The sources (and other apparent coverage from reliable sources like ''The Hindu'') are sufficient to pass 's test for neighborhoods, and given the way our coverage of Hyderabad is structured (with more than 200 articles in :Category:Neighbourhoods of Hyderabad, India), I don't think it would benefit the encyclopedia to delete a sourced and sourceable article about this particular neighborhood, nor is it feasible to merge this into a broader article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Per . Also, how on Earth could this ever meet the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO||WP:CSD)

Comment: I think the key to interpreting  is the phrase: "legally recognised, populated place", as {{u|AusLondonder}} pointed out. However,  I come to the opposite conclusion, since there is no sourcing to show that it is a "legally recognized" place. I can't find it on any census documentation. Therefore it falls to the second category, "Populated places without legal recognition". And in this instance, the coverage in the Hindu seems to indicate that it, just barely, passes . Unlike corporations, which require more than local coverage to show notability, neighborhoods may only have local notability. That seems to be the case in this instance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG)