Deletion of John Vervaeke (2nd nomination)

Comment: Low h-index means that the sources will have to clearly demonstrate extraordinary accomplishments in the field to meet the requirements of . The sources provided fall far short of this.  is the only possible guideline that this individual could have met. The material on the rest of his life is scanty and does not contribute to notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: per Xxan. Teaching, while a noble and honorable profession, is not one of those things that automatically merit notability. There appears to be no serious grounds for notability aside from , and there he falls below our standards for psychologists. Reasonable people might choose not to believe that Toronto is one of the 20 most important institutions on the planet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: WoS shows citation count list of 14, 9, 8, 4, 0, 0...Add to this that he is not the corresponding author on any of the ''cited'' papers and that he is a http://www.utoronto.ca/cognitivesci/directory.htm junior an http://johnvervaeke.com/wordpress/ adjunct faculty member, and  seems spot on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)