Deletion of ATC code A07

Comment: The sentence you quote from  states that notability is established "if the list has been discussed ''as a group or set'' by independent reliable sources", which is satisfied by refs 1 and 2. This is different from inline refs for the individual list items. The latter issue was discussed at Talk:ATC code V10, where
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: If we are going to use WP:LISTN, concerning "reliable sources" as a rationale to keep, please note {{tq|One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed by '''independent reliable sources'''...}}. eliable sources states {{tq|The verifiability policy is strictly applied to all material in the mainspace—articles, '''lists''', and sections of articles—without exception...}}. I added one |primary source, which is better than none, but better sourcing is needed.  I am on the fence because I can see importance as a "navigation aid
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R||WP:primary)

Comment: per nom. Per Wikipedia:Stand-alone_lists#Appropriate_topics_for_lists we can have lists on whatever we find encyclopedic and useful, which makes list AfDs always a bit weird. This list is one of ~100 similar pages in :Category:ATC codes setup to mirror the content at https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/. I agree that these aren't encyclopedic, and are just a mirror of an index. While  doesn't say "Wikipedia is not a mirror of published indices", I think pages like this are outside the scope of our project. As far as a navigational aid, the category system is indeed a directory and an integral part of WP; I'd support (and be happy to help with) turning these lists into categories instead (e.g. :Category:Drugs with ATC code A07
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This looks like a reasonable list-class article satisfying . Most entries have articles themselves and the inclusion criteria derive from a WHO classification scheme, surely a notable and reliable source. As a navigation article placing these drugs in perspective, it looks fine to me. Claiming a  directory isn't relevant for well-sourced navigation article with clear inclusion criteria per ; the category system is a directory, too, and an integral part of WP. Fear of a maintenance burden is never a good reason for deletion. Hence, keep. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOT||WP:CLN)