Deletion of Cariris (footwear)

Comment: Astronaut, I do see what you are trying to do here: there's been a lot of edit warring on Cariris between the footwear and Indian factions. Splitting the content in two is a good way to deal with that. But having searched a lot for sources myself (including http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?pz=1&cf=all&ned=uk&hl=en&q=%22cariris%22+sand%C3%A1lia&cf=all in http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22cariris%22+sapato&btnG=Search+Archives&ned=uk&hl=en&scoring=a Portuguese, I just can't find evidence that the footwear company meets |notability requirements. This article's deletion would be an odd fate for its content, which lived for a long time in the original Cariris article before that was repurposed, but think of it this way: if the editor from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cariris&diff=next&oldid=303654572 this diff had simply tagged the original article as an A7, waited til it was deleted, and then created a new article about the indigenous people at the same title, I think this case would have looked quite open and shut to us. If the deletion does go ahead, I'll watchlist Cariris to help to keep down the edit warring
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)