Deletion of Heavy Woollen District

Comment: to West Yorkshire as a non-notable informal area without legal recognition per . None of the keep votes above have provided sources to support a standalone article - the current sources are certainly insufficient, containing no in-depth coverage
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: It appears to be a name with some history, appearing in ''Commercial Relations of the United States with Foreign Countries'' from 1868, specific parliamentary discussion including discussion of unionisation from 1905, and significantly referenced in government transportation studies from the 1970s. The article's sourcing could be improved, but this definitely passes  as a "non-official" geography. Much of the sourcing I found was from the late 19th century, so the place name may be more historical than it has been (logical due to its industrial nature) but this is not a reason for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Many keep arguments rely on widespread usage of the term in sources, but this isn't enough. For example consider "Central Southern England" - this is used in numerous contexts to refer to an informal area, but there's no consensus on what this area is, and no sources discuss this area in detail outside of their own specific contexts, so we don't have an article on it. Just because a trade union, or a bus company talk extensively about their "Heavy Woollen District", this doesn't make the term notable outside of those contexts. So we could have an article on the Heavy Woollen District branch of the General Union of Textile Workers, or the Heavy Woollen District Transport Association or whatever, but unless there are sources discussing and defining the area in detail outside of specific uses, we can't have an article on it (Look at the Further Reading on Staffordshire Potteries for the type of coverage needed). Lots of sources have been waved around, but can anyone name several specific ones that are sufficient to satisfy GNG? If not,  suggests we may be much better off talking about this area in the context of another article, such as West Yorkshire
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PAGEDECIDE)