Deletion of Abstract Wikipedia

Comment: There's plenty enough at present to demonstrate in-depth reporting by a variety of sources to meet the  threshold
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I just added additional news coverage from France (an Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#ZDNet|RSP-greenlit source), Vietnam, and Germany (×2), and that's in addition to the Neowin article in English and the article in Czech. I can't say I'm 100% sure that each of those is a RS, but they each appear to be from a news organization, so I'm pretty sure at least two of them are (and anyone who wants to check, feel free — several of them have WP pages in English, and I'd guess some others have a page in their native language). We should be careful not to introduce |language bias here — it makes sense that most of the coverage so far is not in English, given that Abstract Wikipedia is being publicized as mostly something to help out non-English Wikipedias
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NONENG)

Comment: I could see a concern if it was still a proposal and not approved. But it meets  now, and we all know it will increase with time, a delete at this point would be pedantic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)