Deletion of List of professional sportspeople convicted of crimes (3rd nomination)

Comment: An unrelated cross-categorization that fails  criterion #6.  It also fails : {{xt|Caution should be used with content categories that suggest a person has a poor reputation (see false light). For example, Category:Criminals and its subcategories should be added only for an incident '''that is relevant to the person's notability'''; the incident was published by reliable third-party sources; the subject was convicted; and the conviction was not overturned on appeal.}} (my emphasis)  If this were limited to sports-related crimes it might comply, but as it stands, it is verging on the kind of celebrity fancruft that belongs in the tabloids, not here.  And before anyone points out this is not a category, BLPCAT also says {{xt|These principles apply equally to lists, navigation templates, and Infobox statements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:BLPCAT)

Comment: from nom. I'd also like to add that there are a lot of intersections that we stay away from because they are either toxic original thought or egregiously |POV: "List of socialists who have been convicted of assault". "List of feminists who have made rape charges that were dismissed". "List of Republicans who have been convicted of fraud". Most people aren't against athletes in that way, but some are -- they feel that the attention and riches showered on them is toxic to society, and would like to point out that they are often thugs rather than paragons. Probably this list wasn't made by someone of that mind, but the effect is the same as if it had been
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)