Deletion of Media coverage of cats (2nd nomination)

Comment: I concur. It is predominantly, perhaps entirely, 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: The massive block of  and  at Media_coverage_of_cats#The_Cat_Archetypes has to go. It reads more like a college essay than an encyclopedia article and has no sources; this concept would go at Cultural depictions of cats anyway. Both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catnip Times and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Purrington Post were found not notable, not sure why there should be an article just for them but Cats and the Internet could even include that. The magazines could be covered at an improved List of pet magazines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: this is a |fork of Cultural depictions of cats, as noted above. We have |almost always deleted "fork" articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK||WP:OUTCOMES)