Deletion of GI's Against Fascism

Comment: In addition to sources already in the article, this group was covered in https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/8506593/ an article published by the Arizona Republic on October 29, 1969. The attack by the nominator on Haymarket Books is unseemly and unjustifiable. According to our content guideline , "Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject. Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs. Although a source may be biased, it may be reliable in the specific context." I believe that books published by Haymarket are generally reliable in the context of left wing political topics. The fact that this publisher sometimes republishes works by deceased authors is evidence of nothing, and personal attacks on individual authors that it publishes are evidence of nothing and completely irrelevant to this debate. There is nothing in our policies and guidelines that requires that our sources be "mainsteam", which is an arbitrary and subjective standard. This deletion nomination is fundamentally flawed, and normal editing should proceed to improve the article. I have no objection to a possible later merge into an article about a successor organization
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)