Deletion of Wasaphone

Comment: per above and close per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Comprehensively fails . I could find nothing apart from the two brief product reviews already in the article. Note that refs https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wasaphone&oldid=694342966 1 and 2 were deliberately misleading, making it look as if there were two reviews on each of those websites, when there was only one each. The remainder are either ads for the microphone or the company's own website. The one to Musicacristiana.biz, a defunct Spanish-language Christian music site(!) is almost certainly a fake. It has an access date of 12 April 2015, but that site was already defunct by December 2014 https://web.archive.org/web/20141218003906/http://musicacristiana.biz/. This has all the hallmarks of the paid-for article, springing fully formed from the hands of a "new" editor, complete with multiple perfectly formatted and highly misleading references and a perfectly formatted infobox. I concur with
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: The only reliable sources are reviews about the product. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH)