Deletion of Mass killings under capitalist regimes (2nd nomination)

Comment: This is a  train wreck, and it's not savable given the hopeless vagueness of its topic (what's a 'capitalist regime'?). I've just checked, and it's substantially different from the earlier article (whose history ended up at Mass Killings caused by Capitalism), so it's not eligible for speedy deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: WP:Fringe viewpoint based almost entirely on one source--Le Livre Noir du Capitalisme. It should be discussed in that articles and it is possibly worth mentioning at Criticism of capitalism. Almost everything else in this article is  and . Some of the sources are terribly abused as well. Both Chomsky and Kurz argue that the topic of "Mass killings under communist/capitalist regimes" is ''not'' one of serious academic discourse because of the flawed methodology. And they only devote a few sentences to it. Those views are worth including as criticism of the (two) Black Books (engaging in that), but it's not at all justifiable to base an article on misrepresenting those critics as arguing ''for'' such a topic. What's next, mass killings under monarchies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: as  and  unless a substantially broader base of references can be found and a well-rounded article crafted (which I doubt is possible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: albeit this article certainly needs substantial rewriting. I see absolutely no reason why  applies in this case but not for the equivalent Communism article, and although many argue above that capitalism is not a political system but merely an economic one, this is not for them to decide - if there is sufficient academic backing for this conception of capitalism in relation to politics, then that is what should matter. However, I would be happiest with a renaming of both this and the equivalent communist article in line with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)