Deletion of Stuart M. Brooks

Comment: I'm not much of an expert on medical notability, but with 8 papers having over 100 citations each in Google scholar including nearly 700 for the RADS paper I think this is a pass of #C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: The paper to which the article sources the subject's discovery of Reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (and of which he is the lead author) shows up with nearly 700 citations on the standard GScholar search - overall, GScholar shows the subject's h-index as a bit over 30. In many academic fields, the h-index would be quite enough to assume notability under #1. In fields like medicine, with heavily multiply-authored articles, it probably isn't quite enough by itself, but I am regard that heavily-cited article (and, to a lesser extent, a number of others with three-figure citations) as enough for notability. Pinging
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)