Deletion of Rachel Washburn

Comment: Does seem to have attracted SIGCOV in RS, and therefore passes . But having read through the article, I have no idea why
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: appears to pass  and there is  coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SUSTAINED)

Comment: Has received enough sustained coverage to pass GNG/|BIO like https://www.morningjournal.com/sports/its-history-here-rachel-washburn-makes-historic-appearance-for-columbia-football-team/article_bbf73f1c-0987-11eb-9b61-e3e9c740ca64.html this article, for instance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO)

Comment: The subject has received sustained coverage in reliable and independent sources over an extended period of time. Therefore the subject passes  and . The length of time by which the subject has been discussed allows for an article to be created on the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)