Deletion of Joe Loughmuller

Comment: As a response to a (very unhelpful comment which doesn't help establish the notability here), I will list all of the GBooks searches. None of the books mentioned here represent , and thus aren't good sources for establishing notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I would suggest SmokeyJoe to read  which says there needs to be evidence that the subject had a significant coverage, and second  that his argument is discarded on AfDs (note that there is admission that the sources are weak, which actually gives a Delete argument rather than a Keep one). Now, onto the notability of the subject. I am personally a huge fan of creating articles about people which work is now historical, but Joe isn't a one. All Goggle Books results gave passing mentions, and there were 0 sources to be find in my searches. If he was actually truly notable at some point of his career, someone would have cared to mention him 38 years after his death. Listings of the song, and a coverage about a band () do not establish a notability per . I don't see any case of  being met, no prolific awards  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRV||WP:MUSTBESOURCES||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BASIC||WP:NMUSIC||WP:ANYBIO)