Deletion of Abdulaziz Bin Turki Bin Talal Al-Saud

Comment: passes , per the sources in the article. Also,  aside, we do have an article on Prince George of Cambridge, a minor British royal. So being a minor royal is not forbidding to have an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: minor Saudi royals are |not automatically notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm very surprised that despite even ''stating''  there are still OSE arguments flooding in. King Abdullah had 36 surviving children, and countless more grandchildren. This isn't the British nobility where there may be a half-dozen children at most (at to be honest, I'm sorely tempted to AfD Margaret of York). Being nobility ''does not make him automatically notable''. I am curious what {{u|Wikimandia}} thinks about the article itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)