Deletion of Texas Alliance for Life

Comment: per . Texas Alliance for Life is a regional organization that has not had significant impact on the national or international issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)

Comment: This was the eigthth AfD posted by user Hahc21 in only thirteen minutes.  I do not see how they could possibly perform |due diligence on so many articles in such a short time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: from a brief review of the available sources, it appears to be noticed; whether it's truly notable depends on |whether one considers those sources to be reliable.  In this case, I am leaning towards notability.  The sources generally are of the 'alt-weekly-press' type, but there's also a discussion by the ''Austin American Statesman'' - considered by most reasonable users to be a reliable source. Disclosure: I am pro-choice
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Fails  for lack of significant coverage ABOUT the organization. Although it gets numerous http://www.google.com/#q=%22texas+alliance+for+life%22&hl=en&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=JmHKT9XdKaPa2AWh243aCw&sqi=2&ved=0CCsQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=196fce005e751d19&biw=1029&bih=671 hits at Google News Archive, all of them are passing mentions along the lines of "TAL endorsed so-and-so" or "the executive director of TAL said such-and-such." There is no significant coverage at all that describes the organization. Per , "A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. ... The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered."  also specifically states that "quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources" are regarded as trivial coverage, not counting toward notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: Weakest sources I remember seeing for a political group. All of the article except for a phrase is effectively uncited, as two of the citations are from the organization itself. The third, or should I say only, cite does not even verify the phrase,  "Political Agenda: Defunding Planned Parenthood", as the TAL is said in the article to be "funding abortion alternatives". Moreover, it is a single sentence mention in an article about the Texas Senate voting for more money for women to get physical exams and tests, etc. If it were only the current state of the article, I would say as I always do, that is an issue for the talk page, not AfD. But there is only passing mentions and local coverage  available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGO)