Deletion of Consultative selling

Comment: It is irrelevant whether the information in the article is trivial or whether everyone has always been doing this. And if the article is unreadable (aster egg|Easter egg alert: that is not the same as |patent nonsense), WP:so fix it|so fix it, don't delete it. The only relevant criterion is whether the topic is ''notable'', a requirement that is fulfilled if there exists non-trivial coverage in multiple independent |reliable sources. There are many http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Consultative+selling%22 book hits; I have not attempted to evaluate how reliable they are and how non-trivial the mention is, but some books have this even in the title, and it would thus seem plausible there is enough material out there. &nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E||WP:patent nonsense||WP:reliable sources)

Comment: why not improve it yourself, if you are a sales trainer and have knowledge of the topic and can produce good quality references from |reliable spurces
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)