Deletion of Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election

Comment: Nom's complaint seems more related to |NPOV violation than meeting the criteria for deletion.  Topic itself seems to meet criteria for notability, verifiability.  Proper remedy is to improve the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as it is filled with |unreliable information and |opinion, with |spammy links.  The entire mess appears to be a |coat rack for Ron Paul's campaign.  This is the sort of "informational list" that gives WP a bad reputation as inaccurate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SOAP||WP:SPAM||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Just to clarify, my concern is not the NPOV of the article, it is the nonNOPV of the references.  There are a few NPOV references from msnbc (for example), but a lot of the information, as presented, would need to get deleted in the absence of neutral, independent sources.  At that point, I am not sure there is much left.  Further, there are some sections of this article that appear , based on inventing systems of ranking candidates based on polling
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: the individual straw polls in the article do not need to be individually notable; per , the subject of the article (2008 straw polls) need to be notable, but the threshold of notability does not limit what is included in the article.  This is why we have, for example, Christian Heritage Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election filled with non-notable people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: all the guidelines of  are followed. The blogs just show the information for the results of a straw poll
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)