Deletion of List of terms in Charmed

Comment: I think wiktionary wouldn't want fictional words and phrases (and I guess #DICT exists because wiktionary already covers the ''real-life'' dict defs, so this policy should not apply here). Furthermore, this is one list collecting X phrases, not X pages about one dict def. It's also not indiscriminate and is suitably referenced, so I think this list is fine. (Except that it's a bit fancrufty, but then again I've never watched this show.) &ndash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Very little to point out that hasn't already. I know that similar articles exist because they haven't been deleted yet. But per , that's not a legitimate argument. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. While it's interesting, the article is just cruft that belongs elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Original research, written in an |in-universe way. A lot of these are dumb with a capital D, as well; who'd've thought that electricity generation is the ability to generate electricity
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: While  is not a good argument, I just thought I'd bring up the article Spells in Harry Potter, which seems quite similar
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)