Deletion of South Horizons (2nd nomination)

Comment: The expansion has certainly established the notability of the former power station on the site, but that is not |inherited by the succeeding development. South Horizons Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South horizons|wasn't notable in 2006 nor Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Horizons|in 2007 and it still isn't. The addition of news stories falling under  and "references" dealing with adjunct buildings such as kindergartens isn't going to change that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: User:Zanhe|Zanhe, :User:Jtbobwaysf|Jtbobwaysf: In this case, if you strip out all the travel guide/gazeteer stuff, which doesn't belong in Wikipedia in the first place, you are left with a basic description of where South Horizons is, when it was built and how many residential units it contains, which by no means makes it |notable. These details can easily be covered in Private housing estates in Hong Kong. This topic area is similar to the various AfDs that have arisen in connection with List of streets and roads in Hong Kong - just like roads, some private housing estates are notable, some aren't and this one isn't
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)