Deletion of Snowclone (2nd nomination)

Comment: The word gets a lot of G-hits (16,200 total; 322 of the first 1,000 unique), but I have to move for deletion 1) because the word (even as defined by the article) is a neologism coined 2.5 years ago, and 2) per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:I wouldn't know him from a hole in the ground (WP:HOLE)

Comment: I'm not convcinced mere novelty is the same as non-notability. For obvious reasons neologisms are going to tend to be non-notable, but then their articles can be deleted on that basis. The article itself doesn't look like original research either, it looks like it's a description of what went on at Language Log. Surely we're not going to require that every article be copied and pasted from somewhere else to avoid running afoul of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)