Deletion of 2016 Presidential candidates reactions to the Charleston church shooting

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS, , etc.  A condensed version would be useful on the main Charleston church shooting article though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per |POV FORK, |COATRACK. This will end up being all about what Rick Perry and Hillary Clinton did or did not say. Presidential primary candidates' commentary is not relevant to this or any other tragedy or major event
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK||WP:COAT)

Comment: The extent of this article is . The "candidates" are not particularly qualified to comment, their statements are no more than personal opinions. The current mention at Charleston church shooting is sufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: WP:RECENTISM . Nobody is going to care what the various candidates said a year from now, let alone 10 years. To the degree that such opinions are notable and encyclopedic, the should be summarized in the main article. If its too much to fit there, its probably being covered in an  manner
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:10YT||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: this makes little sense as a redirect, and less as an article. . . Imagine the amount of articles every Presidential election season would produce if this were an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE||WP:10YT)

Comment: with content from Charleston church shooting#Reactions into a new article, Reactions to the Charleston church shooting, in which this article would form a section. The reactions section in the main article is already quite long, and a separate "reactions" article seems reasonable and with enough scope to be a good |length consistent with 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:LENGTH||WP:SUMMARY)

Comment: as per . While Charleston church shooting is likely to persist, the reactions of presidential candidates will not, and Wikipedia is |not a newspaper. Including some of this information on an individual candidate's page, where it becomes a significant statement from the candidate, may be appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:NOTNEWS)