Deletion of Tortoise Tales

Comment: via recent  and  that the article has been improved since it has been nominated. Also, because like
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SUPPORT||WP:INVOLVE)

Comment: I'm not familiar with the book, but Google turns up with quite a large number of hits. The book is listed in several online book stores, this is also where the (missing) ISBNs can be found ({{ISBN|0840763891}} and {{ISBN|9780840763891}}) and from the specs and plot summaries listed there it is easy to verify the information given in our article to be accurate, so we can be sure that we didn't spread any false information. The information we give is verifiable. A quick one minute search revealed one independent review already: http://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/ruth-manning-sanders-7/tortoise-tales/. So, formally  is almost fulfilled already. With a bit more effort, I'm confident, more reviews and refs can be turned up. This appears more a question of work than of notability to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)