Deletion of Richard Michael Egan

Comment: Lacks |significant coverage in |reliable sources.  No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability.  Sorry, but it's |too soon for an article on this person.  When the ''New York Times'' or ''The Hollywood Reporter'' write an article about him, then he'll qualify
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: looking at his credits, he just seems like an extra. Doesn't qualify for his own article. Plus the one ref on there is a twitter status that isn't even from a verified twitter. I find no sources about him with a google search, so very much fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)