Deletion of Lyall Howard

Comment: As a non-Australian who'd be hard pressed to name any Australians other than Shane Warne and Harold Bishop, I came away from this article feeling like I'd learned something. Whatever the reasons for the man being famous, he does receive press coverage in his own right, and I can't see a problem with this article at all. I've never held with people who say  is an invalid keep reason; as long as it's properly sourced, in my opinion  is the Wikimedia Foundation's ''primary purpose
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:USEFUL)

Comment: The article is a badly written |attack piece on a non notable person, centered around an incident wikipedia has yet to even find notable. If people agree it is notable then a sub section should be created at History of Papua New Guinea
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attack page (WP:ATTACK)