Deletion of Bill Vicenzino

Comment: Many papers with 100s of citations, including several as first/last author (in a field where that matters) gives  C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Google Scholar citation counts https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JPOBTp4AAAAJ show a clear pass of #C1 and "Chair in Sports Physiotherapy" https://shrs.uq.edu.au/profile/269/bill-vicenzino probably also passes #C5. There is no shortage of primary-sourced but adequate material for factual claims about him; secondary and independent sources are not needed here (they are part of the wrong notability criterion, , not part of ). But even if it were needed, his research also has plenty of mainstream media coverage https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-sportsmedicine-gluteal-tendino-idUSKCN11Y21N https://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2013/02/05/cortisone-plus-physical-therapy-doesnt-work-for-tennis-elbow-study/ https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/27/do-cortisone-shots-actually-make-things-worse/. That coverage is of what he is notable for having done, not the sort of coverage of his romantic history or taste in restaurants as we might expect for celebrities not notable for having done anything, so the nomination statement looking for celebrity-like coverage is so far off-base that this could be a speedy close
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)