Deletion of Martin Rundkvist (2nd nomination)

Comment: based on  and  but I do concur with {{u|Piotrus}} on this and want to add that the person is at least notable than many biography stubs we have
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF)

Comment: I found only one review of his Barshalder work at {{doi|10.1017/S0003598X00500854}}. That isn't enough for  or , and neither is his citation record on Google Scholar nor his service as managing editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: Rundkvist was the managing editor, not editor-in-chief, of ''Fornvännen''.https://aardvarchaeology.wordpress.com/2018/12/01/farewell-to-fornvannen/ I don't think that meets the letter or spirit of #C8: the idea is that editor-in-chief is a prestigious position and therefore a rough indicator of notability as an academic. Managing editor is more of a practical role and, by Rundkvist's own account, he got it when he was still very junior. Aside from that I'm not sure about notability. He has a well-known, long-running blog that might have generated some media coverage over the years (perhaps in Swedish if not English). There might also be reviews of his books that would pass /. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:GNG)