Deletion of Magic in Negima

Comment: again, please go read the 6th section of  and look how your ''very crufty'' arguement fit into the  page.  If it is not notable, say so and say why it is not.  Certain fancrufts has their notability, it is not a good thing to use it as an arguement when supporting a delete status.  I agree that this particular article might not be notable due to its culture impact is not very great and would probably be very hard to find a third party source, however, THIS IS EXACTLY what this AfD discussion should focus on, NOT the article is fancruft or not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:CRUFTCRUFT)

Comment: This seems pretty cut and dry with 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)