Deletion of G. V. Loganathan

Comment: Fails , ... just because the event was notable doesn't mean each person who died because of the event is notable. (As per nom, 9/11
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NN)

Comment: I think this is one of those exceptional cases where it doesn't matter that he doesn't quite pass the  test. The higher standard is: are people who don't already know him going to want to look him up in WP to find out who he was? And I think, because of the shooting, he will be. Not to mention that the article in The Hindu has sufficient depth and importance, I think, together with the briefer mention in The Times of India, to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)

Comment: he was a journal editor and won awards as an academic. And to quote  "it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception" (). This is certainly an exceptional case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:IAR)

Comment: He appears to pass |the applicable notability guidelines to me, particularly based on his (a) VT awards and (b) position as Associate Editor of a peer-reviewed journal.  It would be easier to !vote if a hydrogolist or someone else with specific expert knowledge could weigh in
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROFTEST)