Deletion of THINGS (1989)

Comment: To be more specific, the requirements at  have already been discussed and Barryjedmonton has provided a very weak argument that the film passes. If anything the sources provided and arguments given confirm just how limited the notability for this film is, that only a small subset of people have paid attention to it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: Both articles are so difficult to read and figure out what's important. And there's absolutely nothing from |RS that I could find
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Sorry, I should have indicated that the standards we use to judge notability in this instance are at .  Notability has a particular meaning at Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: THINGS (1989), meets , delete Barry J. Gillis, doesn't
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: both and send to  as meeting inclusion criteria of  which instruct "''A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject''" and per the inclusion criteria of  as "''historically notable''" per "''Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release''" and "''given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release''" (seems quite clear
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP||WP:GNG||WP:NF)