Deletion of Christopher Tavarez

Comment: Please provide a link to a Wikipedia policy which supports deletion of poorly written articles. For a list of commonly accepted reasons to delete articles see #REASON
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)

Comment: per the substantial coverage in several reliable sources. See http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-116463356.html this article in the ''Atlanta Inquirer'', http://www.cbsatlanta.com/video/24391611/index.html this news coverage in CBS Atlanta, and http://www.amnews.com/stories/2010/07/13/uks.036156.sto this article from ''The Advocate-Messenger''. These three sources provide nontrivial coverage of the subject.{{user|Whoosit}} is wrong that Chris Tavarez fails . Wikipedia:ATHLETE#Basic criteria says, "A person is presumed to be '''notable''' if he or she has been the subject of multiple published, non-trivial Wikipedia:PSTS#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources|secondary sources which are Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject."Because Christopher Tavarez has been the subject of multiple published, non-trivial reliable sources, he passes , Wikipedia:Notability (people), and Wikipedia:Notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: While the citations can be verified (though sources are of questionable reliability), he simply doesn't pas  or . Yet. Give the kid 5 years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:ENT)

Comment: Borderline notable per  (criterion 1). He's had a number of credited roles and is a leading player in two pieces currently in production. It's a bit of crystal balling, but once those are released he'll more easily pass . Here's some independent news coverage: http://www.amnews.com/stories/2010/07/13/uks.036156.sto
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT||WP:ENT)