Deletion of List of Jewish actors

Comment: per , criteria #6, which states that: ''"Wikipedia articles are not non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "People from ethnic/cultural/religious group X employed by organization Y" or "Restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories like these are not considered sufficient basis to create an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon."''  This article is an almost exact fit for "People from ethnic/cultural/religious group X employed by organization Y", where religious group X = Jews and organization Y = actors
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Per established precedents for such lists of notable individuals, as clarified in , , , AT, and , this list is specifically per applicable policies and guidelines and serves the project and its readers.  And in addressing some delete !votes based upon a misinterpretation of policy, if these actors already have sourced Wikipedia articles, including them in a list with defined parameters is '''not''' a violation of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SAL||WP:LSC||WP:LISTNAME||WP:SALAT||WP:LISTPEOPLE||WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: 6 of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: as non-notable intersection. And the new "criteria" ("notable for being Jewish"?), aside from not matching the list title, are original research that could never properly pass . The fact is, the majority of (caucasian) actors have played a Jewish role - so the criteria that someone had to have played a Jewish role to be included is pretty odd, aside from, again, being original research (and what constitutes a "Jewish role"? That could be argued about for far longer than is worth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: A search immediately turns up excellent sources such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-v2Di_5ShGMC&pg=PA136 The Jew in American Cinema'' and ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=B5cYAAAAIAAJ The Universal Jewish encyclopedia''.  The topic therefore has great notability and all the rest is a matter of ordinary editing per our |editing policy.  There is no case for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: Whilst I understand the nominators reasons, he has been the biggest contributor to cleaning up the article and appears to have come to the conclusion that the job is too big to manage; however I have to disagree with the nomination.1) compared to other Jewish categories this hardly a WP:Battleground only two heated debates in the 4 years the article has existed both were resolved in good faith and neither formed a revert war. 2) This is not a non-notable intersection The majority of people on the list have made some attempt to connect with Jewish Culture by playing Jewish roles, this is the definition of a notable intersection. Some editors would like to make this more specific limiting entry to those who have performed in Jewish Theatre for instance, however WP:EGRS says "a notable LGBT activist is not automatically included in a corresponding LGBT musician category, unless also notable for one or more LGBT-related music compositions or performances." note it does attempt to limit this to LGBT cabaret musical compositions but any LGBT composition or performance which could exist within a non-LGBT concerto or Show, this should be the same for any Jewish acting performance of Jewish relevance even within an non-Jewish centric film or play. I'd also add that the list is a better place to deal with , and  issues where we can explain any conflict rather than these people ending up in a Category where the criteria for inclusion can't be explained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BLP)

Comment: Wikipedia should not be placing people into subjective and potentially contentious ethnic or religious categories.  Doing so is against the spirit of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCAT)

Comment: per nominator, per , and so on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: I do not share the nominator's concerns that this article is a ",  and -violation magnet," as this is a wiki where it is equally easy to hit the edit button and insert inappropriate material into any article. If the nominator believes their issue with this type of list "needs to be addressed in a broad, not narrow, way" then they should start a (broad) request for comment, not a (narrow) article for deletion nomination. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NOR||WP:V)

Comment: per  as argued just above by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)