Deletion of Hands Off the People of Iran

Comment: does not appear to meet , does not even appear to avoid 's "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:V)

Comment: I'm taken aback by the blase nature of some of these deletion arguments: "My 3 minute Google search", "Borderline speedy". Please take a little more effort in considering deletions, it's just so easy to pile on. Cut-and-paste is a shoddy way of writing an article - thank you Craftyminion for stripping it out - but that shouldn't be taken into account in considering notability. I've added some sources, some of which were already mentioned on the talk page. The group has received coverage in the British and Irish press, so this is certainly not just a vanity piece, and HOPI does have significant support from the British left. It's not just a couple of random activists. Even if it is decided that the organisation isn't notable enough to keep, per  we should merge content to Opposition to military action against Iran rather than just deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: I've tried to strip out some of (what I think are) the more egregious breaches of  with a view to salvaging this marginal article. I've noted as such on the article talkpage. I'm not yet persuaded that it deserves to survive this AfD, so I'll hold off with a !vote for now
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: per , clear case IMHO, borderline speedy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: for  - no evidence of "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)