Deletion of Irina Zhuravleva

Comment: as articulated above, this article already walks the knife-edge of , most of the citations are directly to papers, and it seems (pending OTRS confirmation) that the subject of the article would prefer it gone. No objection here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: I see no reason to not keep this article as it is fully sourced. Also, seems like a  from this user
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Citations for first-author papers are 220, 86, 56, 49, ... enough for me (in conjunction with the highly-cited group work) for a borderline pass of #C1. As discussed above, named assistant professorships aren't indicative of notability. So if this were a normal AfD I would probably side for a weak keep, but I think it's borderline enough that if the  can be verified through OTRS then we should honor it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: providing source checks out). #C5 would not be satisfied but #C1 might, but only marginally. I do not see any single-author cited publications, so evidence of independent achievement is sparse. This is often a problem with people who work in large groups. The BLP was created by a self-confessed novice editor, who possibly may not have consulted the subject, as is often the case, and has given offence
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NPROF)