Deletion of PIXELearning Ltd

Comment: I declined a speedy - for |unambiguous promotional-ness - but thought that the article should probably be deleted at AfD. However, Pcap's sources sway me towards keep: the first one, in seriousgamessource, looks |reliable as far as I can make out and together with the book and Gscholar mentions adds up to notability in my mind
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:RS)

Comment: no ''significant'' coverage in reliable, verifiable independent secondary sources (
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPANY)