Deletion of Vera Baker

Comment: Non-notable person who is only mentioned because of tabloid media that are definitely not |reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per the lack of sufficient coverage in |reliable sources. None of the reliable sources I have reviewed covers the subject in the depth necessary to pass Wikipedia:Notability (biographies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per Unionhawk. |risky
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: absent the speculative accusations of adultery, which we clearly cannot include at this point, there is nothing to suggest she would pass .  Even though the material that remains about her is uncontroversial the article simply doesn't stand on its own.  I could find no substantial sourcing about her and don't see that any has been presented, only passing mentions.  This would be a reasonable candidate for deletion even without the latest gossip, although that is probably what brought it to the community's attention now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fails , as the sources are about minority fundraisers in general, giving brief mention to this woman as part of a larger context.  Was surprised to see that the article was actually created last Sept 09, but the bulk of the revisions didn't hit it til this past week, in a mad attempt to make it into a |coatrack criticism of Obama over an alleged affair and coverup
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COATRACK)