Deletion of Third holiest site in Islam

Comment: and clean-up.  The article is in its early stages, but it has enough verifiable info, IMHO, to establish that the topic is encyclopedic and meets |Wikipedia's list guidelines.  If I understand correctly, there does not seem to be much dispute that Mecca and Medina are the two holiest sites in Islam, but there are several sites in contention for the title of "third holiest site."  I understand that this idea is offensive to people who strongly believe that only one of the contenders is the 3rd holiest, but most or all of the entries seem to have verifiable and reliable sources for their inclusion, and if people disagree with one source or another, the solution is editing, not deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: per , , and countless other violations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:NOT)

Comment: I find the reason for this nomination extremely weak. Of course, some improvement, NPOVification, etc. would help, but I don't think the content of the article qualifies as "an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information". On the contrary: it makes an attempt to systematize information that interests so many people today and is in the news all the time. And #Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)