Deletion of Seconds Apart

Comment: per Donaldd23. The film meets  with the reviews from ''Variety (magazine)|Variety'' and ''The Times-Picayune/The New Orleans Advocate|The Times-Picayune | The New Orleans Advocate'' (Nola.com), which are both |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM||WP:RS)

Comment: Passes  per reviews in reliable news websites and magazines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: not only does it meet , but it easily passes  as well.  There is a ''Variety'' review cited in the article https://variety.com/2011/film/reviews/seconds-apart-1117944330/, and there is a link to Rotten Tomatoes which has Critical reviews listed https://www.nola.com/entertainment_life/movies_tv/article_e0af4757-a0b5-5b8a-88a9-6a9e307e5b4a.html|1 and https://www.ign.com/articles/2011/05/26/seconds-apart-dvd-review|2. Also found a review at CineMagazine https://cinemagazine.nl/seconds-apart-2011-recensie/|3.  Was a  done before nominating
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFILM||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Passes GNG and . I've even added a few sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)

Comment: it meets , no matter that I don't find its story interesting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFILM)