Deletion of Pornography-induced erectile dysfunction

Comment: also per {{user|Gaijin42}} above. All concerns of nom can be solved by editing, and as such |deletion policy requires article to be kept. If the title is misleading, it can be moved to a new title
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: marginal sources are in use, and they have been used inappropriately to extend one author's opinion to medical causation.  The notion should be removed from Wikipedia until/unless a -compliant source is available
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: It may not be medically reliable, but the meme passes  by leaps and bounds. Perhaps the title and or wording should be changed to indicate it is not a medically established fact. Broadening the topic may be helpful. Other forms of sexual dysfunction are also associated (maybe not scientificially, but still) with excessive porn viewing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The article purports to be about a medical topic, but fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: As noted the blog and the tv show are not reliable. This purports to be a medical condition, and the sourcing is clearly inadequate for that. what is left is half a paragraph from the book The Brain That Changes Itself, which does not meet , and does not give sufficient coverage anyway. To claim an internet meme is notable you need to show that it is of note. This is done through . This has not been shown, I found no reliable sources, and thus the article inherently violates  as it can not be made neutrally without implying that Pornography-induced erectile dysfunction exists despite no MEDRS source stating that. Symptomatic of this is that despite 5 days at AfD, the article still fails  requirements and makes claims about Pornography-induced erectile dysfunction
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:GNG||WP:NPOV||WP:MEDRS)