Deletion of Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation

Comment: This nomination is silly. The nominator evidently failed . There are countless of references in several RS sources with detailed coverage https://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enGB770GB770&biw=1366&bih=637&tbm=bks&ei=bCECW5vsF4ePgAb46aG4BA&q=%22nigerian+tourism+development+corporation%22&oq=%22nigerian+tourism+development+corporation%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...6440.10203.0.11361.2.2.0.0.0.0.87.167.2.2.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.ysybmsno4uE. If the nominator bothered to check before making such a foolish nomination they would have found out for themselves. This is also a government organisation with great coverage, and as such, very notable. Any advertisement (as commented by one above) should be removed/edited. However, that in itself does not warrant deletion when the subject is covered in great detail by multiple RS. This is a silly nomination. If I earn a $ for every silly nominations brought to AFD just this week alone I'd be super rich. Perhaps we should start charging for silly nominations as this is getting ridiculous and rather time consuming
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The article was a promotional mess when this AfD started, but since we have improved it, it now meets  and is clearly a notable organisation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: The article itself is a bit of a mess. I've cleaned it up a bit in case it's kept, though it needs more work. Based on the available sources I've found, there's definitely enough here to pass , including the news sources discussing the political appointents already in the article. It didn't seem to me to come off as an advertisement, and in any case it's easily fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)