Deletion of Annika Connor

Comment: COI promotional article on a non-notable young artist with no significance at present and who fails  by a long shot. To quote the second sentence of the ''Highbrow'' interview: "A staple on the New York social scene, Connor has spent years cultivating a reputation as a philanthropist, feminist, fashion icon and muse." This wiki article seems to be another attempt at cultivating an image -- as a significant artist. There is nothing about her art that is remarkable, and the very weak sourcing shows it. The fact that during the Trump era she has done some political-based works and thus cultivated some mentions does not change that. (PS: I said above I was unprepared to !vote in this AfD but the more I look into it, the more I agree with others: this is not a significant artist and we should not have self-promotional articles on non-notable artists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Meets  with three verified solo shows (and possibly a fourth) in NYC galleries, plus numerous group shows, and a significant profilehttps://www.highbrowmagazine.com/5085-meet-annika-connor-art-world-s-socialite-realist focusing on the subject. Also and https://artefuse.com/2017/04/02/an-interview-with-artist-actress-and-activist-annika-connor-124999/ interview at Arte Fuse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Added additional citations to the article. Meets  because her work "has won significant critical attention." In addition to what's been described above, her painting ''American Angst'' (2016) was part of the "Uprise / Angry Women" exhibit at The Untitled Space in New York City, which was featured in the Huffington Post, Teen Vogue and Mashable. Additionally, due to all the times her work has been featured in various galleries, the amount of coverage about her satisfies  for "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST||WP:GNG)

Comment: there is absolutely nothing here to say that this painter is notable. All coverage is routine and very low quality. There are about four barely acceptable sources, and by that I mean that they just barely qualify as sources. The majority of the coverage is interview-style and promotional in nature. Fails all notability tests, and especially  on all counts.Special:Contributions/104.163.148.25|104.163.148.25
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)