Deletion of Baharlu dynasty

Comment: this is not a fairy tale, but I do have my concerns. The Baharlu/Barani connection to Kara Koyunlu is easy to source.https://books.google.co.il/books?id=fY01Tc2SZVEC&pg=PA153&dq=Baharlu+dynasty&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8q9u1_8vbAhWDecAKHTBOC24Q6AEINzAD#v=onepage&q=Baharlu%20dynasty&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=X6iQBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT111&dq=Baharlu+dynasty&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjr8LLq_8vbAhVLe8AKHcJsDAk4ChDoAQg8MAQ#v=onepage&q=Baharlu%20dynasty&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=pl8LAQAAMAAJ&q=Baharlu+dynasty&dq=Baharlu+dynasty&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihpP2lgMzbAhUTe8AKHZ60Dk04FBDoAQhRMAg The connection to Quli Qutb Mulk and Sultanate of Golconda is present in our article stating Qara Yusuf as an ancestor (but off the same bulletin), and is evidenced in some sources (which I'm less sure of their quality - but it does seem to repeat).https://books.google.co.il/books?id=BcLLDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT28&dq=Baharlu+Golconda&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwms-XgszbAhVPeMAKHRSYAKEQ6AEILzAC#v=onepage&q=Baharlu%20Golconda&f=falsehttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=b_THAAAAIAAJ&q=Baharlu+Golconda&dq=Baharlu+Golconda&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwms-XgszbAhVPeMAKHRSYAKEQ6AEIKzABhttps://books.google.co.il/books?id=_ZJEAQAAIAAJ&q=Baharlu+Golconda&dq=Baharlu+Golconda&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwms-XgszbAhVPeMAKHRSYAKEQ6AEIRDAG The  Oudh State line seems connected to Golconda - but I'll admit I did not try to source that - and this particular connection seems tenuous (per our article -  was Qutbshah's 4th cousin 2 times removed.....). So - at least parts of this article pass  - so its not all a fairy tale. My concern, is  - while there seems to be some sort of established connection to the Kara Koyunlu and Baharlu (at least for Golconda) - it is not clear anyone refers to the connection as a "dynasty". Absent a clear source that does, I'm '''leaning delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SYNTH)