Deletion of Rhianna Pratchett (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nomination appears to have been done without following  as a simple http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enCH291CH305&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=Rhianna+Pratchett google search produces plenty of useable |reliable sources, eg http://www.joystiq.com/2009/03/18/rhianna-pratchett-launches-portfolio-website/ Joystiq, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2009/mar/27/rhianna-pratchett-pratchett-gdc-game-developers-conference-gdc-2009 The Guardian, http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3168630 1UP, http://kotaku.com/5064401/rhianna-pratchett-returns-for-overlord-sequels Kotaku, http://www.newsarama.com/games/090107-mirrors-edge-Rhianna-Pratchett.html Newsarama.com, http://www.writersguild.org.uk/public/008_Featurearticl/319_WGGBFeatures.html the British Writer's Guild, also mentioning she won that organization's 2008 award for video games script, http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/tag/rhianna-pratchett/ Rock Paper Shotgun and all of this within the first 15 search results. Come on now. This passes  and  without a shred of doubt even if the article is in a poor state. AfD shouldn't be used for cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:RS||WP:RS||WP:V)