Deletion of 1991–1992 United States network television schedule (late night)

Comment: per : "mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules (such as the annual United States network television schedules) may be acceptable"--emphasis on ''may be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: This is very trivial information, and Wikipedia is |not a TV guide archive. Else why stop at TV schedules, how about one article per city and year listing the bus schedules of the time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: of these and everything else in :Category:Television schedules, per Edison and the fact that Wikipedia is not paper. This information is vital when dealing with the history of television, along with the articles in :Category:Years in television. This material would be in a television encyclopedia so it's absolutely appropriate for Wikipedia. People are right, Wikipedia is not a TV Guide. But these lists are not issues of TV Guide. I don't see how these could violate  since that says "although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules (such as the annual United States network television schedules) may be acceptable." All of these lists have great historical significance. If people want the lists to have more sources, they should look for them. For example, 2008–2009 United States network television schedule has 33 refs. So I don't see how deletion is the answer. A decision to merge the late night schedules into the List of United States network television schedules|main list articles is another topic altogether. And speaking of precedent, there was no consensus to delete in any of these related AFDs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_US_network_TV_schedule_articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1997-1998_United_States_network_television_schedule http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1985-86_United_States_network_television_schedule_(Saturday_morning) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1983-84_United_States_network_television_schedule_(Saturday_morning) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2007-08_United_States_network_television_schedule http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/1982-83_United_States_network_television_schedule
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: obviously, and now even ''' delete all''', per all the arguments.  This is simply not encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Please read  before trying to apply it where it is inapplicable. Several editors have presented good-faith arguments that substantial coverage in numerous sources suport notability, and that the articles comply with all Wikipedia guidelines. Also as noted above the AFD is ill-formed and out of process and should be closed, since a mass of unlike articles are nominated, without noting previous AFDs which have resulted in articles being kept, and without clearly identifying the articles presented for deletion, due to the vague "Any other bluelinks on United States network television schedules (late night) that qualify" in the nomination
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: including United States network television schedules (late night). Wikipedia is not a TV guide and I would also argue that it is these lists fall under  in that it is not a "Mere collection of public domain or other source material." Television schedules are source material, public domain, and widely available. We also are not a mirror of TV.com and the like. This and other such lists are not encyclopedic and do not add to the body of knowledge here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTREPOSITORY)