Deletion of George Udeani

Comment: The citations for the resveratrol paper are quite impressive, but his position in the author list indicates that his role in the paper was relatively minor, and the rest of the citations, while not bad, aren't enough to convince me of a pass of  #1. And if not that, what reason is there to keep the article? Contrary to Tomas e's keep comment, he himself has not received attention from general media: some of the subjects he's studied have, but notability is not inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: at first glance this person seems notable, but upon further examination and consideration of the discussions above, it seems pretty clear to me that he does not pass , and the fact that he appears to have been only a minor contributor to these discoveries does not indicate to me that he merits inclusion under the notability guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)