Deletion of Alexander Flor

Comment: This article looks like it was written by the subject himself.  For example, it keeps using the term, he is "credited" but without any documentation as to who credited him other than himself in his own, non-peer reviewed works.''  I vote to promptly '''DELETE''' it for the following reasons:  1) Searched and found no evidence of notability that would pass ; 2) No secondary sources are presented or available to keep this article; and 3) He has not been published in any top-tier (Thomson Reuters/ISI) peer-reviewed journal/forum in his field
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I vote to delete this WP article.   The key problems with this article are that it miserably fails to satisfy the clearly-stated criteria for  and it also clearly violates , while serving as a self-promotion tool for this person.  It seems that the only one voting to keep it is the creator of the article (Alternativity) for obvious reasons. However, his defense of this article is something that is based on pure opinion and cannot be validated, or hearsay evidence as they call it in court.  Simply put, this Alexander Flor (the subject of the article) appears to be engaged only in mediocre scholarship by seeking to use Wikipedia as his platform for self-advertisement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:SOAP)

Comment: At some universities vice chancellor is the top administrative position but in his case it appears that the university president fits that role and that vice chancellor is a lower level position, not enough to meet #C6. And http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=4JZUqZgAAAAJ&hl=en his citation record is not enough for #C1. What else is there
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)