Deletion of Sigma FC (2nd nomination)

Comment: outside of BLPs, my guiding principles are  and , the most-relevant question for me being, "Is there enough RS to write a decent stand-alone about this?" In this case, I think yes. It ''just barely'' passes GNG, not with  but with two: https://www.thestar.com/sports/2016/10/23/local-soccer-academy-has-become-playground-for-future-stars.html this article in the Toronto Star, and this two-part series in Red Nation (magazine): http://www.rednationonline.ca/articles2014/sigmafclayingthegroundworkforcanadianyouth.aspx Part 1, http://www.rednationonline.ca/Articles2014/SigmaFCDefiningaroadmapforfutureCanadian.aspx Part 2. With those two sources, there's enough material to write an article. In addition, I found 13 pages of Google News results with routine coverage (game, transfer, and signing reports). All in all, it's enough to convince me that a stand alone article is warranted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:PAGEDECIDE||WP:THREE)

Comment: Notability is clearly established from the refs. Passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The mentions are  sports coverage. Fails FOOTYN, etc
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (:WP:ROUTINE)