Deletion of WetLeather

Comment: per nom. The links provided above are marginal at best (some don't even mention the group), although they do establish that it exists. However, they don't even come close to meeting the "significant coverage" part of the  criteria apart from the first (and that looks like a blog in all but name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: The problem seems to me to be that the references given are mostly trivial mentions of the group. There is nothing that backs up the content of the article or demonstrates that WetLeather has had "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" per . The main source of information seems to be the group's own web site... which brings us on to another matter. Large chunks of text in the article are taken ''directly'' from the website, which is a serious copyright violation and completely unacceptable on Wikipedia (in fact, this is a speedy deletion criteria
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)