Deletion of John Ditslear

Comment: GNG overrides NPOL. NPOL would assume notability in a lot of instances. What NPOL does is helps distinguish which coverage is significant versus coverage which is not significant, since any local politician will always have local news stories about the local politics they are involved in. The significant coverage test for local politicians, on the  page, is multiple feature articles in multiple sources, which doesn't appear to be the case for Mr. Ditslear, at least not on the sources shown
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: coverage (Proquest archive search,) is limited to  regional and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)

Comment: Being mayor of a suburb is not an automatic free pass over NPOL just because he exists, but the article is not referenced well enough to actually make him notable under . A couple of pieces of coverage in the local media is not enough to get a mayor over the bar in and of itself, because every mayor of everywhere could always show that — in a city this size, the sourceability and substance of the article has to add up to "this mayor is a special case over and above most small-city mayors", not just "this mayor exists", to get him over the bar. GNG is not automatically passed the moment the number of sources in an article exceeds two, and it is not necessarily passed by purely local coverage that's simply ''expected'' to exist for ''all'' mayors — so showing a few pieces of Indianapolis-based coverage is not enough in and of itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)