Deletion of Grey2K USA

Comment: Search in the "archives" tab of Google news, like http://www.google.co.in/#q=Grey2k%2Busa&hl=en&tbm=nws&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=E_-zTpG2EtCzrAeLyfXQAw&ved=0CBYQpwUoCg&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&fp=1811873673607e1f&biw=1280&bih=663 this. It will show news reports from the archives as well. The 5 results you mention are just the recent reports. Notability clearly established by various 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Extensive coverage in books and magazines, such as http://books.google.com/books?id=-E9CLW6Gh8sC&pg=PA158&dq=%22Grey2K+USA%22&hl=en&ei=M5G0Tv_SGOrXiALO7flO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22Grey2K%20USA%22&f=false here, http://books.google.com/books?id=DGobAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Grey2K+USA%22&dq=%22Grey2K+USA%22&hl=en&ei=M5G0Tv_SGOrXiALO7flO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAw here, http://books.google.com/books?id=m2FVzZmZVGMC&pg=PA33&dq=%22Grey2K+USA%22&hl=en&ei=M5G0Tv_SGOrXiALO7flO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22Grey2K%20USA%22&f=false here, http://books.google.com/books?id=QWNWAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Grey2K+USA%22&dq=%22Grey2K+USA%22&hl=en&ei=M5G0Tv_SGOrXiALO7flO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBQ here, http://books.google.com/books?id=rpXyAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Grey2K+USA%22&dq=%22Grey2K+USA%22&hl=en&ei=M5G0Tv_SGOrXiALO7flO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CFoQ6AEwCQ here, an encyclopedia entry http://books.google.com/books?id=9_xCOrQpNToC&q=%22Grey2K+USA%22&dq=%22Grey2K+USA%22&hl=en&ei=M5G0Tv_SGOrXiALO7flO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=11&ved=0CF0Q6AEwCg here, as well as extensive news coverage http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/news_press/access/1834823851.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Dec+15%2C+2002&author=Deron+Snyder&pub=The+News+Press&desc=Racing+foes+fight+for+dog+rights&pqatl=google here, http://www.whsv.com/home/headlines/111284399.html?storySection=story here, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/bostonherald/access/839592031.html?dids=839592031:839592031&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=May+14%2C+2005&author=SCOTT+VAN+VOORHIS&pub=Boston+Herald&desc=Less+than+dogged+pursuit%3B+Activists%3A+State+slow+out+of+gate&pqatl=google here, http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/bostonherald/access/1511333291.html?dids=1511333291:1511333291&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jul+16%2C+2008&author=SCOTT+VAN+VOORHIS&pub=Boston+Herald&desc=Grey2K+bests+tracks&pqatl=google here, and http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/boston/access/236585081.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+13%2C+2002&author=Rick+Klein%2C+GLOBE+STAFF&pub=Boston+Globe&desc=LAWMAKERS+EYE+CASINOS%2C+SLOT+MACHINES+FISCAL+WOES+SPUR+INTEREST&pqatl=google here, where they are described as "one of Massachusetts' most politically active anti-gambling groups".  Night of the Big Wind is making a classic  argument, which is one of the arguments to avoid in deletion debates.  There could be a topic that has hundreds of thousands of Google hits to blogs, YouTube and various social networking sites, and that topic would not be notable by Wikipedia standards.  On the other hand, a topic could have only three or four good, solid hits turned up by a Google News Archive search, and still would be considered notable if there is significant coverage in high quality reliable sources, like this topic.  When books published by solid publishing houses and major newspapers give significant coverage to a topic, then the topic is notable.  Tens of thousands of Google hits are simply not required
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS)