Deletion of Willem van IJperen

Comment: There are a fair number of articles at http://www.google.com/webhp#hl=en&sugexp=frgbld&gs_nf=1&qe=d2lsbGVtIHZhbiBpanBlcmVu&qesig=bis71qHoO3iHd2aMjnp9tA&pkc=AFgZ2tmHuRhtzynG--aQ_nrYt7uJxXbMt1A-Awshq1v8whmFWN_zJDtJCeW7UBdd7yAeofO-f1TQOMDcPK3t5xo5zpEHXuIBRg&ds=n&pq=william%20van%20ijperen&cp=5&gs_id=2g&xhr=t&q=willem+van+ijperen&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&oq=willem+van+ijperen&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=1d6fc3adc6e3eaf8&biw=1058&bih=664 Google News, but they are all about that one incident, a clear case of . Google Scholar finds nothing so he does not qualify under . "Fellow of the Royal College" does not appear to be a big deal, it simply means that he is a certified specialist; there are more than 13,000 such Fellows.http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/member-services/categories-membership/categories-membership
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:ACADEMIC)