Deletion of Eric Mandl

Comment: Based on what's in the article right now, he appears to be a |run of the mill  business person. There's only a single reliable print source actually about him in the article, which is just about him getting a new job. It's the exact same incident in the ''Times.'' That's not |significant coverage. ''At best'', this is a case of |a single event. At worst, an SPA has written this as an ad
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Voting for deletion, as the subject has not accrued sufficient coverage to meet ; they seem to be a run-of-the-mill businessperson.  mandates coverage be independent and in-depth, and while the subject is named in many press releases, they themselves have not accrued significant coverage when separated from more notable entities () they are affiliated with; indeed, most mentions of the subject in the sources cited only run for a sentence or two, and some citations failed to mention the subject at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBIO||WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTINHERITED)