Deletion of Connect-A-Pedia

Comment: oh boy, a wiki game that's surely notable, if only there weren't a string of unfortunate circumstances that mean that none of the many, many solid references to it can't be shared or found anywhere.   applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: non-notable game, similar to countless others. No assertion of notability and no multiple sources in breach of . If this game really did make WP random article games popular in Australia in 2002 there will be lots of sources to confirm this, right
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:ATT)

Comment: per above, fails , ,  and .  Despite creator's assertions of this game's popularity, there aren't even any hits on the ''Australian'' Google http://www.google.com.au/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=10&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Connect-A-Pedia&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images.  I don't suppose that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:V||WP:NFT||WP:COI)

Comment: Just a piece of advice, rather than telling us that this game is notable in Australia, prove it to us. Cite your sources, where is the proof that it is Wikipedia:Notability|notable? The reason people are voting to delete is because this looks like something that is |made up. Show them proof of your claims and I'm sure they will vote to keep it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP)

Comment: per , , , possibly , , , , #IINFO, as well as numerous other guidelines which I currently can't think off the top of my head
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NFT||WP:HOAX||WP:OR||WP:WEB||WP:ASR||WP:NOT)

Comment: original creator confirms no notability.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)