Deletion of Deadmalls.com

Comment: Seems to have had sufficient coverage in |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Seems to have paid its dues in |reliable sources, therefore establishing notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: meets . Several instances of independent news coverage by |reliable sources (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6533240 National Public Radio, http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/business/stories/2007/07/15/dead_malls.ART_ART_07-15-07_D1_5O793B9.html Columbus Dispatch, http://www.deadmalls.com/news/20030704-money.cnn.com/ CNN and http://www.deadmalls.com/news/20011216-sacramento-bee/ Sacramento Bee for example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS)

Comment: Satisfies the Wikipedia notability guideline  with substantial coverage in multiple reliable and independent sites. The story at National Public Radio, for one, says that the first place potential investors in a mall go is Deadmalls.com to see what it says about the mall. Google News Archive shows 64 hits over a span of several years http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=deadmalls.com&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: and suggest . The article clearly passes . Multiple, in-depth, reliable sources (and many more that have come out since the article was created as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:WEB)