Deletion of WAPT (deployment software)

Comment: for the reasons given in my original PROD echoed above by Kleuske. While this may be useful software, that doesn't mean that it is notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia.  If there are reliable ''independent'' sources that confirm the notability of the software per GNG or  I would be happy to change my position.  But I couldn't find any and none have been produced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: I think Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information|ANSSI which is refered to in the article ought to be considered a reliable source that meets : it is significant, independent, reliable and secondary. And the report mentioned in the discussion covers most of the technical aspect of the software discussed in the article. Among the other secondary source which I think covers all the reliability criteria is the presentation WAPT_(deployment_software)#cite_ref-8 given at JRES conference covering usage at Institut national de la recherche agronomique|INRA. And for the  point of view, I think it covers all the criteria (except maybe the geographical area which is currently mostly limited to French speaking countries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NSOFT)