Deletion of Carr Street (St. Louis)

Comment: Ordinary streets are not notable. If there is any particular reason for notability in any particular case then that fact should be demonstrated. Leaving aside arguments such as whether  is a requirement, and concentrating on whether evidence of notability of any or all of these streets has been produced, the answer is clearly "no
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: to Streets of St. Louis, Missouri per above and per precedent.  When notability is established on a particular location (Carr Street should probably be relisted separately from the other ones, which clearly have not demonstrated any notability), then an individual article can be created.  Nothing is really lost this way, and it is consistent with the principle of establishing  before mass-producing articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There's nothing to be gained by deletion here.  I've browsed the sources for Carr Street and this seems to be a substantial street in a historic part of town with notable features such as a ferry across the Mississippi.  If the rest are other downntown streets then they will have a similar historic character but we're not going to be checking them all out right now.  Per  and our |editing policy, we should be exploring sensible alternatives to deletion first.  Merger to Downtown St. Louis would be better than deletion, for example - maintaining the edit histories, assisting navigation, forestalling recreation and enabling the individual articles to be fleshed out as material accumulates
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: this includes notable streets with references. If there are specific non-notable streets, these should be specified individually, not en masse. Has  been followed correctly? I suspect not, at least not in all cases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)