Deletion of Closed community

Comment: Listen up people. This subject has |significant coverage http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2134602/?page=1 here, http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/2/319.full here, and http://journals.lww.com/obgynsurvey/Citation/1963/18010/Trichomoniasis_in_A_Closed_Community__100_Per_Cent.35.aspx here. It has technical and |historical significance covering the biological and https://www.waikato.ac.nz/wfass/migration/docs/guerin-sent-network-paper.pdf social sciences from 1963 to the year 2008. And that's only for sources I've found in a simple Google search. This stub can be improved. And no it's not a simple dictionary entry. It's encyclopedic for its significant impact on health care and society and its wide technical coverage in academic literature. It's not a dictionary term. The subject is a strategic concept to manage and control diseases as well as handle communities
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: with , regardless of how the article is written now, unless someone actually believes there aren't any reliable sources out there which could be used to expand this article, the 'dictionary definition' arguments don't apply much
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Excuse me.  specifically states the major differences between an encyclopedia and dictionary. For Wiktionary, "articles are about the actual words or idioms in their title and all the things it can denote. The entry octopus is about the word "octopus": its part of speech, its pluralizations, its usage, its etymology, its translations into other languages, and so forth." For Wikipedia, "articles are about a person, or a people, a concept, a place, an event, a thing etc. that their title can denote. The article octopus is about the animal: its physiology, its use as food, its scientific classification, and so forth." The delete and move suggestion to Wiktionary certainly runs counter to Wikipedia policy. Also, not being able to find discussions of a concept is not a sufficient reason for deletion. Multiple sources describing the concept are available. I want to expand this stub at a later date
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTIONARY)