Deletion of Chris Rothfuss

Comment: There is little newscoverage of him, at least thus far. GoogleNews gives only two hitshttp://news.google.com/news?q=%22Chris%20Rothfuss%22&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn. Not enough to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: As outlined by JohnCD and Pete Hurd above, does not meet  (one of the clearer Wikipedia policies in my eyes). If this guy would be notable, I'll create a couple hundred articles next week on similar French candidates for Senate. Those people are actually pretty "historical" over here, too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: WP:POLITICIAN allows for the possibility that, due to press coverage, etc., a candidate may otherwise satisfy . The way I read it, it does not automatically rule out from notability considerations all coverage related to the election. That would be a pretty silly read -- it would have ruled out, say, Ned Lamont while he was challenging Joe Lieberman. The way I see it, the first policy prevents people running for local justice of the peace from getting their own articles. But a major party US Senate nominee will inevitably garner enough publicity to meet , particularly given how delicate the party balance in the US Senate is at the moment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)

Comment: Wikipedia is not an election billboard. Per #Politicians, just being an unelected ''candidate'' for office does not confer notability, and no other notability is demonstrated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)