Deletion of Megan McCauley (2nd nomination)

Comment: Inclusion criteria change over time, just because it was kept once doesn't mean that it should be kept now. She fails criterion 10 of , according to my interpretation of it. She comes close with criterion 5, but not close enough. Most damningly of all, I can only find trivial mentions in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: an artist who has no charting singles and no specific mention in reliable publications is a breach of . Looking through the article, a lot of it is unsourced. Of the four sources: one is blogspot - it can be discounted straight away, the second is a myspace page - it can be discounted and the third is another wikipedia article - a big no-no. Notability established in a previous AfD does not stand as an argument for notability today. As it stands half of the information on this page should be removed as its unsourced. An article with this many redlinks and little coverage from third party sources provides little contextual signficance. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Article lacks the reliable sourcing to make her notable. In fact, I searched and cannot find any secondary sources which are reliable and are independent of the subject. Simply put the article fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: We already decided this in 2005. There was an AFD on this article, the result was keep, and because |notability isn't temporary, if she was notable then she's notable now. It's certainly possible that the sources that established notability then have since disappeared from the web, with the ironic result that the earlier nom has actually anchored the article, providing evidence that subject was notable at the time.- Simon Dodd
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)

Comment: just about meets , point 10: 'Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.' It's pretty marginal, but three songs in soundtracks of notable movies is probably enough to qualify
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: per  and . Insufficient coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:V)