Deletion of Shalom Reimer

Comment: Appreciate the neutral notification to revisit this AfD, given my delete !vote above. Thank you for your clear argument and digging up those sources, as well.  isn't a guarantee, or a presumption, of notability, rather a suggestion that "coverage probably exists, go find it!" imo. Indeed, it states as much on the page. We do very frequently delete things that appear to 'meet' the additional criteria in  (there's a ongoing WT discussion regarding SNGs, tangential to this area, which may be of interest btw). I don't think a bunch of regional sources which are a couple of paragraphs at most which practically just state "Reimer won Miss Teen BC this year!" is significant coverage. It's pretty much un-of-the-mill; we don't give articles to every other pageant contest winner, year after year, especially when nothing else is likely to come of it. / applies as overriding exclusionary criteria. The vast majority of such individuals tend to not go further into pageantry. This individual is notable for one event in 2016, nothing since, and it's unlikely she will. She doesn't have the substantial coverage required for her own article. Hence I continue to support deletion, as we've done with previous individuals of this genre, and I believe she should be listed in the table at Miss Teen BC
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:NBIO||WP:R||WP:BIO1E||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Wondering if Samsmachado is somehow connected to Shalom Reimer and therefore not capable of being neutral in this situation per  and . Samsmachado's profile states this user is a Canadian student interested in theatre - Shalom Reimer's LinkedIn profile (which Samsmachado removed from the article in the edit history) indicates she is currently a BA student minoring in theatre. That may explain why Samsmachado is the only person arguing very insistently for several weeks to keep an article that nobody else agrees should be kept, even going so far as to ping people repeatedly and post on their talk pages to seek converting delete !votes to keep !votes. Consensus from 6 people seems to be to delete with 1 person who may be in  constantly badgering other editors despite Wikipedia:Once is enough. With an article that has been improperly relisted 3 times and has been in AfD for over 35 days, this needs to be an admin closure. Non-admin closures likely would lead to a deletion review initiated by Samsmachado. Special:Contributions/174.1.78.77|174.1.78.77
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:YOURSELF||WP:COI||WP:COI)

Comment: I believe the article is now sufficiently sourced to meet GNG. (Coverage twice by CTV plus articles in a variety of local BC papers.) But I would encourage others to re-look at the article as I made the expansions in coverage myself. (note: Winning Miss Teen Canada is a likely indication on meeting crietria 1 of , but failure to meet additional criteria outside of GNG (ie. WP:BIO) doesn't mean the subject is automatically non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: Failed 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)