Deletion of Florry Burrell

Comment: The claim of using blogs as support for sources is likely in violation of , unless they are specifically hosted.  A review of the three sources shows that they are not primary or second are in nature, and so I am pretty sure this article is also in violation of .  Before I continue citing policy, is there anyone in favor of keeping this article that can cite a specific policy in favor of keeping it?  I would like to be swayed, but so far I am seeing nothing to keep this article other than personal pleas that are not based on any Wikipedia policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SPS||WP:V)

Comment: Lonely Beacon should know that I included the blog only as an example of the kind of interest people have in New York City streets and the stories behind their names. This interest is the very reason an entry like the one for Florry Burrell belongs on Wikipedia. This article will help Wikipedia readers learn more about a figure who has been written into the very landscape of New York City, thus improving Wikipedia's coverage of New York City, so even if she doesn't meet the standards of "notability" for Wikipedia, it shouldn't matter since it improves Wikipedia... by the policy 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)