Deletion of Mark Ellmore (2nd nomination)

Comment: Mark Ellmore lost two elections, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't have an article on Wikipedia. His running for the elections has generated at least two reliable sources. The http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/09/AR2006060901699.html first, from the ''Washington Post'', is an in-depth article about his campaign. The http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?article=316136&paper=60&cat=104 second, from the ''Gazette Packet'' covers his victory in the Republican primary. These reputable sources allow him to pass , so this article should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Fails notability. Only mentions are related to his failed campaigns. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: subject is of no great importance (lost both elections), but I feel he does meet the |GNG through sources such as http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/candidate/mark-w-ellmore/ FoxNews profile, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/13/AR2006061301877.html Washington Post story about his 1st run, http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?article=316136&paper=60&cat=104 Arlington Connection story about 2008 race, and so on (see: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Mark+Ellmore%22&btnG=Search&um=1&ned=us&hl=en&scoring=a, but note there are several false positives).  Also was http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/60782 interviewed by California Chronicle which may or may not be a blog.  Certainly there are many more notable politicians but I feel this one meets our inclusion guidelines, if only just barely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)