Deletion of Anthony Holland (composer)

Comment: Definitely does not meet the notability requirements for a . —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The only claim to fame is having a piece on him in ''This American Life'', but ordinarily that one thing would be good enough for me. In this case, though, that one thing is medical research that clearly is non-mainstream, sourced only by sources that clearly do not meet , with no mainstream assessment of whether what he's doing makes any sense. As such, reporting on this work only from advocacy pieces as we do now clearly violates  and , and risks endangering real lives by leading cancer victims away from more proven attacks on the disease. But removing this material from the article leaves nothing of note. And the fierce defense of this fringe material by its proponents (restoring it after DGG's strong warning not to, and repeated removing the fringe tag from it) does not bode well for our ability to keep the article neutral. I think the only solution is to not have an article until such time as he's achieved enough fame that the mainstream is forced to take note of him and provide sources we can use (if it ever does
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS||WP:NPOV||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: Fails notability per  (for the fringe theory section, which was apparently restored) and I don't see it satisfying WP:notability (music) &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)