Deletion of Fortress Of Freedom

Comment: The nominator's points are sound, in that the sources provided are problematic. I can confirm that the subjects exist, which is good as far as it goes, but I'm not seeing anything that really shows notability, under our rules. I would add, in reference to one of the Keep comments above, that claiming that the nominator is racist is precisely the wrong argument to make in this case. It might be different if the nomination was "Delete because subject is of X race". But that's not the case here. You may also wish to review ; you're correct that we review these articles as a group, rather than as individual subjects, but that does not mean that the existence (or absence) of other related articles has any impact on whether these articles should be kept
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)