Deletion of Marc Seifer

Comment: he is a bit more of a hack than a PROF, but we don't judge. He seems notable per  #1 "widely cited by peers",  we don't judge the "peers" either. Sites like huffingtonpost.com do go to himhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/11/nikola-tesla-thomas-edison-poll_n_5577512.html and he seems to get interviewedhttp://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/seifer-marc/7291. His Wikipedia entry is pretty padded and self serving so I'd vote for knocking it back to a stub until it can be supported by secondary sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: the reviews of his work probably get him over the line but I certainly wouldn't object if someone wanted to |delete this and start again or reduce it to a stub at a minimum
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: The only noteworthy thing about this individual seems to be that he wrote a book on Tesla, which, though reviewed in a few reliable sources, apparently failed to make much of an impact. This makes him non-notable as an author. His scholarly output is far too modest to meet the requirements of , and there is insufficient substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources to meet any of our notability guidelines. His notability does not extend between a tiny subset of the fringe pseudoscientific community
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)