Deletion of Hak Ja Han

Comment: duly sourced throughout, though indeed it looks like the sources and the article in general could use some inspection and cleanup - the subject satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: More than meets  and  standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: Did a bit of clean-up work on the article already - now in process of adding to it with additional / secondary sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Contra the nom, I count six references in the article as it exists now which speak specifically of her (albeit generally as "Mrs. Moon" or "Moon's wife" rather than by name) in their titles.  That seems to me to clearly meet , and V is clearly met by independent sources.  Merging an article with sufficient sources like this should be an editorial consensus--not an AfD mandate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)