Deletion of Smith & Wesson M&P15

Comment: Huh? I see about half a dozen sources demonstrating compliance with  already in the article. What WP Firearms has to say about the subject is irrelevant at AfD. If you think the article should be merged then you are at the wrong forum, and if you think the article should be deleted due to a content dispute then you should review 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POINT)

Comment: per the ones above, including what is said about the nomination being . And David, please do '''not''' post the same reply to me as to the others here, I've already read it. Twice even... -&nbsp;'''Tom'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINTY)

Comment: There are already plenty of sources listed on the page already to make it notable. All you have to do is go down to the references and see there are different citations from different locations. That follows 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)