Deletion of Andrew Forbes (2nd nomination)

Comment: His film and television roles can be verified to the projects themselves.... and this actor's body of work over 30 years does seem to meet the requirements of , as named roles as characters are usually significant to the plot and storyline of these various projects.  More toward the point, 3 episodes of ''Doctor Who'' and 11 episodes of ''Strike It Rich!'', 2 episodes of ''The Hello Girls'', and 2 episodes of ''Hollyoaks''  show significance of his characters for at least those series. "Significant roles in notable productions" is not intended to limit to only series' leads, but rather to eliminate those actors who have minor throw-away roles that only merit a descriptive, such as "deliveryman #2" or "man in restaurant".  So let's consider if recurring named characters are significant to plot and storyline... And then we have his work in theater to consider, and the stage reviews which give critical acclaim to his work. Significant roles in notable productions?  He appears to qualify.  But yes, digging through the many false positives caused by this man's common name will be difficult... but does that mean it should or cannot not be done
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ENT)

Comment: this is still a  without a source other than IMDb
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: Without significant coverage in reliable sources, subject does not meet .  Without significant acting roles (if IMDB is accurate, his longest stint appears to be 11 episodes in 1986-87 on Strike it Rich, a show which itself does not have a wikipedia page), subject does not meet .  As such, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ENT)