Deletion of List of fictional deities

Comment: I think some editors need to read . ''Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.'' ''There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists, although non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations are touched upon in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per . I think that this page should be more focused on the concept of "Deities in fiction", with the list items serving as examples of some larger themes of how deities are used in fictional works. The current list is choppy and uneven, and I understand the point of view of the people currently saying Delete. But  says that the current state of the article does not diminish the subject's notability, and I think that it's obvious that the concept of "Deities in fiction" is a notable subject for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN||WP:ARTN)

Comment: Per . It's in a poor state at the moment, but it could and should be pruned entirely to fictional deities with actual Wikipedia pages
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: satisfies  as index of articles and complement to :Category:Fictional deities per  regardless of whether it also satisfies 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:CLN||WP:LISTN)