Deletion of The Artisan Hotel

Comment: per . The sourcing is hyper-local and / or . This is a sales brochure / invesment prospectus, with content such as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE||WP:SPIP)

Comment: Removing all press releases and promotional articles from the sources, appears to scrape past , mostly from the Sun and Spokane articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as no argument for deletion has been advanced.  is not an argument for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JUSTNOTNOTABLE)

Comment: per  - {{xt|Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability.}}. I'm just not seeing anything that can be referenced to bring notability for the building. The current article's content is tiptoeing around the subject but doesn't present anything about ''why'' this building is significant as a separate article. If there's an article relevant for this within a list, a merge wouldn't be a bad idea either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: the implicit reason for deletion is that  is not met.  A 64-room hotel in Vegas won't meet any SNG.  There seems to (barely) be enough for GNG amidst a sea of really bad content and references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)