Deletion of Christopher Sena

Comment: WP:PERP and  are redirects to the same ''notability guideline''. In contrast,  and  are ''content policies''. Citing a notability guideline, right or wrong, does not override content policy. And of course  is not relevant for a convicted criminal, which is probably why no one has used it to argue for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: As  demanded,  the criminal or victim in question should be the subject of a Wikipedia article if the motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual, Sex with a dog or multiple counts of sexual abuse and child abuse, forcing his seven children in having sex with him are not usual
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIME)

Comment: as textbook instance of situation for which  was created. The subject is only covered in the context of a single event, the person is otherwise likely to remain a low-profile individual, and the event itself was not significant enough to merit its own Wikipedia article. All boxes ticked. It's , and should be deleted. As the person who tagged the article for notability, I note that the de-PROD of this article was conducted by an editor who "did not think to look" for a talk page discussion before de-PRODding and removing the notability template. When challenged, the de-PRODding editor compared the case to Jeffery Dahmer, then immediately backed off when asked to show similar levels of coverage in reliable sources. Subsequent edits by the same editor included changing the infobox to feature a prison, for some reason. Whatever is driving this behavior, it's not helpful to our readers, and it's not grounded in an adequate understanding of policy or guidelines, particularly around biographies of living persons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy It certainly was reported worldwide: I have included the New Zealand press and other international news sources. I think the crimes are so mind boggling, as to make this criminal and his crimes extremely noteworthy. Sex with the dog - boggles the mind
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP)

Comment: Plausibly re-title to the crime and not the individual due to BLP1E, though it seems that RSes mainly title per the individual in this case. The crime itself has had national coverage dating back to 2014 (e.g. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/las-vegas-dad-filmed-sex-kids-cops-article-1.2047515) had has had wide international coverage since (e.g. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=12235799 NZ Herald). As the subject has been convicted,  is not longer an issue
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)