Deletion of Bulma (2nd nomination)

Comment: doesn't matter how many keeps this page gets. Per  policy, "''Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: as there are no |primary sources which suggests this is , nor are there |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate |notability. The "Background" section is written from an #The problem with in-universe perspective|in-universe perspective that reads like a #PLOT|plot summary. This article is |fancruft dressed up to look like an encyclopedic entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:RS||WP:FICTION||WP:WAF||WP:NOT||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: I recognize her |fictional importance but there isn't much or any
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:FICTION)