Deletion of Okon Goes to School

Comment: I voted keep above, and I still think it meets . It is a Nigerian film and the Nigerian film industry is in a much less advanced position than that in the US, UK or India, so I would not expect there to be such extensive coverage of the film in the media. It still remains an important feature film in Nigeria with a prequel and a sequel
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article passes basic notability guidelines as per  also as per  an article need not pass every guideline stated in  @{{u|Versace1608}} what you should have done, was communicate through the articles talk or simply, go straight to the article creator @{{u|Darreg}} & communicate to him your issues concerning the article and then given him time to work on it, then if that fails you could now nominate it for deletion. I feel this was rather too harsh, as you both are Nigerian editors and this issue could have been resolved "in-house" I feel it's just a show of mutual respect and courtesy to first communicate with the content creator your concerns and issues with his/her article rather than just nominate it, as you both have good history together and are not unfamiliar to each other
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: seems the people voting for keep are stating baseless reasons outside Wikipedia's |notability guideline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There is no in-depth coverage in |reliable sources that prove |notability. All the refs show is that the film exists, that isn't enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: While there are plenty of mentions of the movie in the various sources that come up in searches, not a single one of them is even close to the in depth discussion needed to establish notability.  They are all pretty much one to two sentence mentions that the movie exists, and  is not a reason to keep an article.  Pretty much every source currently in the article is about a completely different topic, and just mentions the movie tangentially, and searches bring up nothing better.  Saying that the movie was "popular" is not enough to establish notability unless there are also reliable sources that talk about the film in depth, and so far, I have not seen a single one.  Special:Contributions/64.183.45.226|64.183.45.226
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITEXISTS)

Comment: Although I could not find any full scale formal reviews, I found plenty of mentions of the film, its predecessor ''Okon Lagos'' and its sequel ''Lost in London'', and I think it meets . The article needs expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)