Deletion of Drake Jensen

Comment: No valid rationale for deletion has been presented, per -REASON. It's weak that the nominator states they "have a problem" with the topic from the start, which is indicative of bias about the topic, rather than presenting the discussion as should be here, about the notability of the topic per Wikipedia |Nobatility guidelines. To the nom, perhaps consider improving the article instead
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:N)

Comment: I see no reason the sources in the article are not good enough for |notability. Enough were published before his coming out to show that this is not a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Self-production and being on an indie label are beside the point for any artist.  Also, an artist does not have to be world-famous to be notable, and current airplay is not a requirement; the article does mention (with citation to an independent source) that one song some years ago was a favorite on CBC Radio One.  otability says: "A person is ''presumed to be notable'' if he or she has been the subject of ''multiple published secondary sources'' which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."  I count 8 such sources for this article.  I think that clinches it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)