Deletion of Kamal Benslama

Comment: Insufficient citations for . No other indications of notability, and some of the claims in the article are not supported by the given sources, which are not  in any case. Article author would benefit from reading . -- Special:Contributions/202.124.73.93|202.124.73.93
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:RS||WP:YOURSELF)

Comment: The huge number of co-authors on most or all of his papers renders our most common means of measuring academic impact (citation counts and h-index etc) meaningless, and I don't see any other  criterion for which we have any evidence. There is a little bit of popular press for his research http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/images/story.html?id=65def1af-d538-4fe3-b524-44f61abd91cd http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/story/2010/12/03/sk-regina-big-bang-1011.html?ref=rss (which is why I'm only weakly in favor of deletion) but both just mention him as being part of 2000- or 3000-scientist teams, which again doesn't do much to pick him out of the crowd
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)