Deletion of John Resig

Comment: as per Northamerica1000. AfD noms need to do 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Reasons for a speedy keep decision are… The nominator… fails to advance an argument for deletion." "Possibly NN person" is ''not'' a deletion rationale. It's clear that the nominator paid no attention to , or they would have found hundreds of http://www.google.com/search?q=%22John+Resig%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 Google News hits, http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22John+Resig%22 Google Books hits, ''and'' http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22John+Resig%22 Google Scholar hits. Hell, just looking at the article's Talk:John Resig|Talk page should have been sufficient
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The rationale for deletion is a guess, and isn't substantiated. See also: -REASON
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)