Deletion of Michael Everson (2nd Nomination)

Comment: I complete agree with SayWhatYouMeanWhatYouSay, in so far as this page is clearly a violation of . Just look at how eager he is to talk about himself on the talk page! It is obvious that Evertype is using this as a second userpage, and that is a bad example to other users. However, he does seem just notible enough for his own page. Would not oppose a '''Merge''' with Unicode if that was consenus
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)

Comment: not notable. Doesn't meet , either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: possible bad-faith nomination, and possible  violation. I don't really see anything wrong with the article. Furthermore, I see nothing that fails 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The actions of a user are a different issue than whether or not the article is notable. Seems to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)