Deletion of Town of Salem (2nd nomination)

Comment: I've struck my keep, also, after the discussion of sources, though "AfD is " is still true where it applies. Also, I don't have the impression that  differs on sourcing from the ; mostly it offers advice on sequels and compilations, advice which doesn't really apply here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP||WP:NGAME||WP:GNG)

Comment: No depth of coverage in the sources presented—not nearly enough to |do justice to the topic. Other than PocketGamer's short news, the USN and Forbes are blurbs and the rest are press releases or primary sources. For reviews, "Unreality mag" is not a Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable sources|reliable source and I doubt "Board Game Geek" would be either, but its only review is |user-created... The coverage isn't |significant, and there isn't enough material to write an article. I don't see a suitable redirect target either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything (WP:42||WP:UGC||WP:SIGCOV)