Deletion of Harry Potter film/book differences (2nd nomination)

Comment: because these entries have '''zero''' real-world context.  There are always, always going to be changes in the adaptation of a source material for creative and conventional reasons -- the only notable changes to record should be those covered by published, secondary sources, not what an editor ''subjectively'' deems appropriate.  It is |original research for an editor who has watched the film and read the book to put 2 and 2 together and determine, "The difference between these pieces of information is notable to belong on Wikipedia!"  I'm looking at Differences between book and film versions of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone|the article now, and I see an incredibly insipid difference in ''hair color''.  I can't say that the other changes mean much, either, if there is '''no real-world context''' to determine that all these differences mean something except to "It's useful" to Harry Potter fans.  Such differences should belong on a Harry Potter Wikia, not on this encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: to allow this merge to take place without unnecessary delay, given that the only ''Keep'' vote above is based on , /, misrepresentation of  and , and judicious application of OTAGAIN
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:USEFUL||WP:INTERESTING||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:NOTAGAIN)