Deletion of Nottingham University Society of Change Ringers (2nd nomination)

Comment: there seems to be general consensus that the subject is notable. Without a  or  issue, I don't see any reason why we should |blow it up and lose the article history. Replace the bad writing with good writing, by all means. But bad writing is a |fixable problem
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO||WP:BLP||WP:TNT||WP:PROBLEM)

Comment: We do have ''The Ringing World'' as a subsection of another article, and also we are enjoined to assume good faith when a source is not available online and may have only have a weekly circulation of 2,627. To the best of my knowledge, GNG and NORG criteria do not include that a source must be mainstream rather than "fringe". This article does appear to meet , as ''The Ringing World'' does appear to have a national circulation of bellringers across the UK, and its 100th anniversary celebration in 2011 included a a service at Westminster Abbey. As I said above, all of the unreferenced text should be cut, but not the whole article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)