Deletion of The Barrier between Men and Feminism

Comment: Uh-oh. An essay like title. Lead that does a poor job of defining the topic and talks about Intersectionality, without a reference and without reusng the term later. Then discussion of some polls of unclear relevance, a definition of feminism, popular (according to whom?) theories of what? This seems like a poory written essay. . PS. I have now read other comments and I see this is an educational project, so I will put my instructor hat on (I am a professor of sociology and I ask my students to write Wikipedia content too). Well, I am sorry if the students reading this will feel my review was harsh (welcome to peer review, it does not get better - ever, ask your professor :P), but without repeating myself or others, the topic is poorly defined, fails , and at best few sentences could be merged to some other articles. Your (and by that I mean both the students, but also instructor/wiki ambassadors) main mistake here - was not defining your concept properly, and not reading guidelines like . Starting with an essay-like title is a big no-no for an encyclopedic title. There are thousands of missing articles on issues related to feminism, but they are encyclopedic topics (theories, etc.), not essays. Kaldari very wisely noted above you should check with WikiProject Feminism, it is active and I am sure within few days someone would have told you you need to change the title. Chosing the right topic is a key. You can look at links of requested or weak articles listed at said WikiProject's front page: Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Social_sciences#Feminism_and_women.27s_studies, :Category:Stub-Class Feminism articles, :Category:Feminism stubs, etc. Or take any feminism/women studies encyclopedia/handbook/etc., look at index and start typing in until you get a no-page result from Wikipedia, and you are good. Wikioedia is an encyclopedia, you need to create encyclopedia topics, not essays. I hope that helps (yes, peer review can be constructive sometimes too, just learn not to get your feelings hurt too much :>). Good luck
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:GNG||WP:NOTESSAY)

Comment: as an unencyclopaedic and |essay-like topic. Any useful content could just as easily be placed in men and feminism, which is nowhere near long enough to require a content fork. But I don't see anything worth merging in the current version. {{ping|HelloStarling}} Your group would probably find more success editing the existing article rather than creating a new one on a substantially similar topic. I'd also strongly encourage you to read and follow the advice at Wikipedia:Student assignments. &ndash;&#8239
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTESSAY)