Deletion of Sydney Explorer

Comment: I was the admin who restored the PROD deleted article based on a reasonable requests. As is my practice, I do a search on the topic to see whether it meets  to see whether I should list the just-restored article to AfD. My search turned up a significant amount of |reliable source material, certainly enough for the topic to meet . I then added only two of the many references to the Sydney_Explorer#Further_reading|further reading section because they made reference to Sydney Explorer in the name of the news article and had significant information about Sydney Explorer in the article. This topic clearly meets . Damaging the article, threats to damage the article, and stories about the motivation behind contributions to the article are not a basis to delete the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS||WP:N||WP:N)