Deletion of Mark N. Hopkins

Comment: I located four sources via Google. The first is an http://www.documentary.org/feature/meet-filmmaker-mark-n-hopkins-living-emergency-stories-doctors-without-borders interview with Documentary.org; typically I think we use some caution with interviews as its direct from the subject. Next, the http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/30/movies/30doctors.html NYT feature is pretty lengthy, but is mostly about the film rather than the man (though he does get a few paragraphs of backstory near the end of the feature). Finally, I found a http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-n-hopkins/living-in-emergency_b_570968.html blog post on HuffPo, but it's by Hopkins himself, so we can't consider that a . Fourth and final source located is another interview with Hopkins http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127949803 by NPR. I'm on the fence about using interviews to determine notability, so I'm not putting in a !vote, but I thought I'd leave those here for others to evaluate. Ultimately I think we may be looking at a case where the doc is notable but its maker isn't. &spades
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Several independent  citations give him more than passing mention; including one in the ''New York Times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: While the documentary might have marginal notability (not saying it does, as I didn't research it), this filmmaker does not have enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to pass , and he certainly doesn't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:FILMMAKER)

Comment: appears to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)