Deletion of Denise Spellberg

Comment: All three articles taken together seem to run afoul of .  There really may not be a controversy over this book.  No doubt such a spectacle would aid sales and provide notability.  But until the spectacle has come to pass, these articles's contents need to merge somehow or just delete for now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: into the article on The Jewel of Medina. The book may be notable as a subject of controversy; I doubt the professor passes , which is a high standard -- more notable than the average professor, which an associate professor 20 years after PhD, specializing in a narrow historical figure with , is not
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: that it's in the news doesn't sway my opinion from '''merge'''.  The book may be notable (assuming the article doesn't fail #NEWS) but the protagonists are still seem WP:BLP1E to me, no matter how loud the news coverage gets for the event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Denise Spellberg, who clearly passes  on her own merits even beyond the current controversy.  '''Neutral''' on Sherry Jones, leaning towards '''redirecting''' to The Jewel of Medina for now, as it appears that her sole claim to notability is this unpublished novel
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)