Deletion of Senator Murphy gun control filibuster

Comment: Highly passes  and the article is written in an encyclopedic manner with enough third party references
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Redirect''' to Chris Murphy (Connecticut politician). We need to see coverage over a period of time to satisfy . No objection to recreation if we see that, but I'm quite sold that we will (except as a point of trivia or in the context of talking about Murphy or the Orlando shooting -- hence merging). &mdash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting—Chris Murphy (Connecticut politician)—Filibuster in the United States Senate); Per nom and it's very  to say. Not even Strom Thurmond, who has the record for the longest filibuster in the U.S. Senate, has a stand alone article for his record filibuster
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: but unsure. It does seem to pass  based on the way I'm reading it. Kinda hard to know about the "lasting effect" at this point, but it did accomplish the goal of obtaining votes on measures and has probably inspired today's sit-in by John Lewis (Georgia politician)|John Lewis. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEVENT)

Comment: This is not directed at any one specific user. I would want to encourage, generally, people to be careful here to avoid certain arguments such as sounding like the learly notable|NotabilityDiviner or saying that the article should be kept because |you just like gun control. Even though I disagree (but don't think this is the proper place to fully address the issue) regarding how to organize Wikipedia's coverage of filibusters, with
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:IJUSTLIKEIT)

Comment: There is a  argument here which should be avoided as there is nothing stopping anyone from creating articles for other notable events. This leaves  in the argument, I think we should wait and see before outright deletion. If this filibuster accomplishes anything notable then  would apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:LASTING)

Comment: This article shouldn't be deleted. We shouldn't be using  as a basis for deletion. We should wait until the filibuster accomplishes anything notable before considering deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: add a condensed 1 paragraph summary to Chris Murphy or Gun politics in the United States. Fails  and  to have this much detail for a one day. This is similar to Rand Paul#113th Congress (2013–15) that only gives one paragraph to his filibuster, not a whole undue article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:DUE)

Comment: Cleary meets WP:N and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)