Deletion of GuildCafe (2nd nomination)

Comment: on the strength of the Gamedaily coverage. However,  does require multiple non-trivial sources and this article only has one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Meets  &  #1. References #4 and #5 (Next-Generation and GameDaily) are considered among the best videogame sources in the industry. I feel that they are both |reliable sources. GameDaily's article is in-depth and covers the website extensively; the reason that is in blog format is because it is an appraisal of another website. Next-Generation got its information from the press release but they are notoriously strict with what they cover (and usually only write 4-5 stories a day). If this got attention, that is enough for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: I can see how references 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 could be considered trivial, however 5 is an interview by Game Daily (12th hit in Google search for "game news") with the GuildCafe's founder. 7 compares GuildCafe to other MMO/Game social networking sites by O'Reilly (I certainly run into O'Reilly online and in print regularly), if I was to come to this article not having read it before and compared it to  I would say it barely meets the guidelines - but barely is good enough as long as the article is added too as more information becomes public. All references correct at the time and date of this comment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: What in particular is the objection to the sources?  For example http://www.gamedailyxl.com/2006/12/22/systemaddict-digital-identity/ is America Online's gaming publication; might be a blog-style format, but it is a publication with editorial control that would seem to meet .  This sort of presentation is fairly typical within the gaming media
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: no evidence from |reliable sources that the site meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:WEB)

Comment: I see good references, satisfying . &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)