Deletion of Seek ye first

Comment: In fact, it ''easily'' passes . Both ''Albuquerque Journal'' (https://www.abqjournal.com/565006/the-world.html) and ''First Things'' (https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/12/carls-rock-songbook-87-karen-lafferty-seek-ye-first) have published articles specifically on the song. It has also received significant coverage in other articles: http://www.crossrhythms.co.uk/articles/music/Karen_Lafferty_The_Jesus_music_and_contemporary_worship_pioneer_/34890/p1/https://www.reformedworship.org/article/march-1990/seek-ye-first-interview-karen-laffertyhttps://www.christiancentury.org/article/2013-04/singing-one-book
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per M.R.Forrester, or '''Merge''' to Karen Lafferty per Mangoe if no consensus exists to keep as a standalone article, per -M
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: One of the cited sources, ''Hymnary'', has several paragraphs on the background to the song's composition and a basic musicological analysis, originally in McKim. There are also several discussions of the song in Google Books, such as https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=z4eoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA26&dq=%22Seek+ye+first%22+Lafferty&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Seek%20ye%20first%22%20Lafferty&f=false an academic text that discusses the song's financial success, citing another source not on the Web. There's also a https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=AfZYAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT86&dq=%22Seek+ye+first%22+Lafferty&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Seek%20ye%20first%22%20Lafferty&f=false source with more details of the song's composition, though I suspect it's self-published (& therefore not an RS). Also, I would question the applicability of , which tends to assume the candidate song exists to make money in the commercial record industry. I would expect this song would be notable as a liturgical item just as much as a record release, but it's difficult to search through the vast number of quotations to the Biblical text that provides its title. If it gets merged, then Matthew 6 would be far better than Gospel of Matthew, but I agree with {{u|Mangoe}} that Karen Lafferty would be the best option
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)

Comment: per nom, not notable, fails |NSONG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSONG)