Deletion of Aliza Shvarts (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Randy Kryn. Aliza Shvarts was born in 1986, thus 2018 is the year of her 32nd birthday. The article Yale student abortion art controversy basically covers the events which took place ten years ago, in 2008, with 18 inline cites, 17 of which are from 2008 and one is from 2006. On the other hand, the Aliza Shvarts biographical entry is a full-length article containing 49 inline cites dating through 2018. It does not seem reasonable to accept that subject is a  personality dating back to when she was 22 years old and that the additional 31 inline cites are of no consequence, which leads to the conclusion that the biographical entry displays more than sufficient prominence to stand of its own accord.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: without changing the name). Actually I think  does apply, at least so far in her career. Without the 2008 incident I really can't see she would be notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Both issues should be addressed at once. {{u|Vexations}} had the right idea. This compartmentalized reasoning is detrimental. Artist and artwork are closely related subjects. Especially in the case of a merely ten-year-old career. I think there should be only one article. The other article is about an artwork even if that artwork never existed. A concept of an artwork is still an artwork. We are not the arbiters of what is and isn't art. The sources all refer to art or performance art in that "abortion" piece. No source is referring to it as a controversy. Sources might refer to the controversy in the wake of Shvarts' performance art. There are many parallels between this situation and that found at Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight). That article is not in the name of Emma Sulkowicz but obviously a redirect facilitates search. The article is in the name of the main artwork. And "controversy" does not grace its title. The parallels end in that an important dispute involved the accused rapist (and fellow student) that was targeted by the "Mattress Performance", necessitating a separate article, titled Columbia University rape controversy. That article's title receives the term "controversy" but importantly it is not about an artwork. There is no good reason I can think of to have the term "controversy" in the title of the Shvarts performance piece. The name of that article could be the name of the artwork or a |descriptive title such as "Yale student abortion art" or other possibilities
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:NDESC)