Deletion of Jihadi tourism

Comment: You cite . So do I. In particular: "... may be possible to pull together many facts about a particular term and show evidence of its usage on the Internet or in larger society...". Also per , there is no "... analysis and synthesis of primary source material...", and thus not OR. In fact, seemingly everthing in   supports the existence of the article. You state that all sources refer to the second definition, Jihadi tourism for the purposes of terrorist training. These sites use the term to describe the first definition, tourism for the purpose of visiting historically significant sites: http://abcnews.go.com/International/Travel/hezbollahland-war-meets-tourism-lebanon/story?id=11173351http://abcnews.go.com/International/video/tourism-jihad-hezbollah-museum-11181356http://adventuresinleninland.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/holy-jihad-tourism-batman/http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-05-23/news/20910648_1_hezbollah-lebanese-american-university-guerrillahttp://lebanonmatters.com/2010/06/wsj-jihadi-tourism-hits-lebanon/http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703685404575306342008254052.htmlhttp://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=1&id=21039http://www.debbieschlussel.com/23430/new-lebanon-industry-jihadi-tourism-how-much-us-aid-went-to-hezbollahs-anti-israel-war-museum/http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=26844http://www.narutoforums.com/showthread.php?t=622246http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArchiveDetails.aspx?ID=177608http://www.prdailysun.com/news/Hezbollah-promotes-itself-through-jihadi-tourismhttp://www.straitstimes.com/SME+Spotlight/Lifestyle/Story/STIStory_531223.htmlhttp://www.worldtourismdirectory.com/news/3927
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:NEO||WP:NEO)

Comment: The term's obviously in use, but I clicked through all the examples given above, and they appear to all be about the Hezbollah museum being an example of jihadi tourism. I don't see any examples of jihadi tourism being discussed ''in itself'' as  seems to me to require. (Such as an article that seeks to define it, or an article that gives multiple examples to explore the phenomenon in multiple places or over time). The line I'm particularly looking at is: "An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position". The first sentence of this article seems to me to be an example of this; the author's had to infer a definition that doesn't appear to be sourced. I feel like this article's likely to crest notability requirements in the near future but not quite there yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: This is a well-written article and "Jihadi tourism" is a notable phenomenon that deserves an article. But ... the term "Jihadi tourism" is rarely used by   to discuss visits to tourist destinations associated with Jihad, it is primarily used by  to describe "tourists" who are seeking to "latch on to terrorist organizations"http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2009618,00.html or "to train for terrorist attacks." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8302186/WikiLeaks-cables-British-Muslims-travelling-to-Somalia-for-jihadi-tourism.html I also see some right-wing media like Fox and the WSJ seeking to broaden this very pejorative term to describe the much more innocent phenomenon of, for example, Lebanon creating a museum to memorialize its own nationalistic POV about its conflicts with Israel.http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/05/22/confident-hezbollah-promotes-jihadi-tourism-strongholds/ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703685404575306342008254052.html I don't think Wikipedia should be supporting this essentially POV project of theirs by promoting their re-definition of Jihadi tourism. As per the concern raised by others with WP:NEO and WP:SYNTH I would like to see  this article describe the phenomenon of people traveling to Somalia or Pakistan or wherever to join terrorist groups
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:RS)

Comment: So far none of the keep votes have actually addressed the sourcing concerns in relation to the requirements at  which is a non-negotiable policy. NEO policy says that "blogs, books, and articles that '''use''' the term rather than are '''about''' the term are insufficient to support articles on neologisms". None of the sources supporting this article are actually about the term "Jihadi tourism". In a nut shell, the keep votes are '|I like it' comments which show either an ignorance or lack of respect for wikipedia policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: only half the sources used for the article actually use the term "jihadi tourism" and none of them actually ''discuss'' the term as per the  requirement. Most of the sources are also about the one event, something that occurred at a Mosque in Germany. The term is found in just ''one'' book on Google books and that is only a fleeting mention of the term with no discussion. Google scholar gets practically no hits. Looks like a classic case of NEO to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)