Deletion of Soylent (food substitute)

Comment: there are sufficient sources, and the article clearly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The coverage in mainstream news seems to me to establish Soylent's |notability.  mainly says not to give a fringe theory undue weight on a page about a mainstream topic, not that a fringe theory shouldn't have an article about it. Soylent is not covered on Medical food or on any page about nutrition. The article doesn't say that Soylent is any good. It cites sources saying that it's probably dangerous, hasn't been fully tested, and cites facts suggesting that its inventor is not qualified to design an artificial nutritional program. Even if the article gave too much weight to the positive coverage of Soylent (is there any?), that would not be grounds for deleting the article, it would be grounds for |improving it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FRINGE||WP:ATD)

Comment: The references in the article are from multiple, reliable sources and it appears to mee 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)