Deletion of Scientology and Werner Erhard (2nd nomination)

Comment: a) The article appears to exist primarily for the purpose of connecting Mr. Erhard with an organization which connection the sources indicate he consistently disavows.  b)  Many of the sources provided contain circular references (the secondary and tertiary sources reference the primary sources and each other) which reduce the weight of the citations.  c) Although many editors have acted in an attempt to create a NPOV, the article continues to cast multiple persons in a negative light (by direct or indirect reference).  In other articles where these same sources are used,  has been applied more stringently and appropriately.  d) The article contains multiple tagged issues which are unresolved after three or more years of collaborative editing.  These issues are largely resolved in the other articles addressing the same subjects
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This appears to be an unnecessary content fork from Werner Erhard. The information appears notable, but it doesn't deserve its own article - creating an unnecessary fork seems to inherently raise  issues. A merge would be fine also, although the key facts already seem to be in the parent article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (|step 3).  I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 6
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFDHOWTO)