Deletion of List of Romanian expatriate footballers

Comment: per , as a complement to :Category:Romanian expatriate footballers. It is not necessary that a list's grouping be notable as a group (often an incoherent analysis when applied to many lists), as  itself makes clear—it is only ''one'' way to analyze the merit of lists. Where lists organize articles, i.e. where every entry is notable, and the classification is not unusual or trivial,  is the more relevant guideline. Here we have a whole category structure at :Category:Expatriate association football players by nationality. If expatriate playing status is standard and significant enough to categorize, then it's certainly standard and significant enough to list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN||WP:LISTN||WP:LISTPURP)

Comment: the list, but ensure that each of the listed footballers satisfy the notability criteria, per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:CSC)

Comment: Per Postdlf, article should be kept per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: annotated, so much more useful than that category . Categories don't make good lists redundant per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)

Comment: per prior consensus, and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)