Deletion of Rose Funeral

Comment: Dirty Little Rabbits is notable because it contains two (albeit questionably) notable members, therefore passing criteria 6 of .  Rose Funeral does not
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Fails notability per , no significant sources, no notable members, no notable recordings. - A7xandquantumtheory  —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Fails to meet any of the criteria set forth in . No reliable sources to indicate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Just claiming this band "fails notability" per  without actually reading the criterion is simply stupid. Rose Funeral at the very least passes criteria 1, 4 and maybe 5. Possibly others. I'd like to explain criteria 5, Metal Blade Records has a long history and has signed countless notable bands. Rose Funeral has two albums out (One on Metal Blade, one on Siege of Amida that apparently was re-released by Candlelight) and is about to release their third this year on Metal Blade. I know, that is a future event, but what is the point of deleting a band only to recreate the article later on? Also, Rose Funeral possibly also passes criteria 7. Do I need to mention the "UNO" incident? That has also certainly contributed coverage of this band in various news and magazine outlets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Fails notability per , no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters • :User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)