Deletion of List of military figures by nickname

Comment: This list is way too abstract and either needs expansion or shrinking (and a new, respective title if shrunk), however it still satisfies . It needs work for sure but should be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: Seems to fail  and  because half the items on the list doesn't cite any sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:OR)

Comment: The nomination is just a list of |arguments to avoid: ; ; .  There's no evidence that  has been followed as it's easy to find sources which show that this passes .  For example: ''https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aTmI3RmgBwAC&pg=PA77 Military Nicknames''; ''https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-top-10-nicknames-for-generals-a7524171.html Nicknames for Generals
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:TRIVIAL||WP:ITSCRUFT||WP:BEFORE||WP:LISTN)

Comment: per . A large proportion (well over 50%) of military personnel have had a nickname. We would delete a List of military figures, even if inclusion is by wiki notability, as simply too large a list - this list - a list of all military people, notable ones, with a nickname - is approximately the same order of magnitude of size - failing . I also doubt that nicknames of all military personnel (from all ages / locations) are discussed a set
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:SALAT)

Comment: I think inclusion criteria can be worked out; there's certainly a  issue right now and many of the entries are unsourced redlinks.  There's also a List of aviators by nickname
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE)