Deletion of Physicians for Patient Protection

Comment: per nom and regardless of any potential way this article could be saved, I will also yield 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: I am just not seeing the coverage needed to meet  or to treat this organisation in a neutral way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: per nom, for failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: or possibly '''Merge''' with an article on the broader topic) with the caveat that this article will need some MAJOR revision for neutrality and likely a high level of page protection if it is kept. They appear to have received significant coverage in several large newspapers, like https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-nurse-practitioners-doctors-increase-illinois-20200206-4x7s7quab5bctjffc7hzxrun3m-story.html Chicago Tribune, the https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2019/12/27/plan-give-nurse-practitioners-greater-role-patient-care-fuels-debate/QiuURmlXLkQfetyIokufnN/story.html Boston Globe, https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2020/02/16/facing-doctor-shortage-california-eyes-more-authority-for-nurse-practitioners/ Times of San Diego. If  isn't met, I think it should be merged and redirected into an article on the issues and controversies around expanded autonomy for RNs and PAs. The article is terrible, yes, but I think the organization warrants coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)

Comment: per nom, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NORG)