Deletion of American Sovereignty Restoration Act (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Explodicle. The subject is not notable on its own, but per  it's worthwhile to preserve the information and commentary
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: A fairly notable bill.  Whether it will eventually pass isn't the question, it's whether it's notable.  The article could be sourced better, I suppose, but it meets all of the criteria at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: to Political positions of Ron Paul#International organizations. S Marshall brings up an excellent point about systemic bias, and I agree with Gloriamarie that this shouldn't go in the main Ron Paul article. However, we've got a very short section in this spin-out article that could use some expansion. Merging to the list of legislation sponsored by Ron Paul would be less than ideal because its mention of all his other bills is very brief and lengthening this entry would give it |undue weight. Failure of a bill is not proof of non-notability, particularly in this case where Ron Paul knew it would fail but wanted to expose his political opponents as supporters of UN membership
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:undue)