Deletion of Biocence

Comment: Non-notable per Wikipedia criteria. To User:Hong Lou Meng, please understand that Wikipedia does not list every product in the world, only products which are |notable according to well-defined, objective criteria: the product must have received significant coverage from independent reliable sources. Biocence has not received any such coverage that I can find. Google News (a search engine to see if anyone has written about it) finds absolutely nothing. Google Scholar (a place to look for academic or scientific reporting about the product) finds nothing but the product's own website. The references listed in the article are not independent; for example reference #2, which is titled "US Department of Commerce" to make it appear independent, actually links to a page on BuyUSA.gov where the text was obviously supplied by the company itself. If the product is not notable, as demonstrated by independent coverage from reliable sources, then no amount of rewriting or improving the article is going to help. The problem is not with the way the article is written; it's that the product simply does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The article is probably |spam and is most definitely not |notable. The article takes lines directly from a press release to assert its notability.  makes it clear that sources for notability must be independent of the subject e.g., not a press release (see also: ) Furthermore, registering a product with the FDA does not automatically make the product notable. The ferocity of the creator's defense, his lack of |assuming good faith, and the fact that he has only edited the Biocence article after returning from hiatus, makes me think he might have a |conflict of interest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:SPIP||WP:AGF||WP:COI)