Deletion of Radical integer

Comment: into Algebraic integer.  Makes more sense to discuss it there and the book is enough to satisfy  for me even if we don't get the original source.  Is it notable?  Dunno, but whats the harm in keeping it
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: It seems like something someone would have thought about before, and maybe there is another source out there.  But this is just speculation.  All we got so far is that Schroeppel made up this term "radical integer" in a discussion on a mailing list, with the help of others he proved some results in the list discussion, Weisstein mentions this in his encyclopedia.  That's not enough.  Now, I've often thought Wikipedia is too stringent at times, but what about in this case?  I feel it's wise.  I mean, who are we supposed to credit the theorem?  Schroeppel says it wasn't just him.  What about the proof of the stated result?  Are we just supposed to state the result and then not say anything more?  If Schroeppel put it up on his webpage, it would be different (for me and some others I'm sure), but he says he can't find the preprint!  It seems that maybe he could find it, but he says that it assumes too much knowledge of the list discussion, so it's possible editors trying to use the preprint to create the article would have to violate  in a substantial way
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)