Deletion of Aerospike database

Comment: I had no difficulty finding "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" of the Aerospike database, per  - starting with 8 of the 10 references already in the article, which point to reliable third party sources. Following are links to some relevant coverage I found in the first few pages of a google search: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/aerospikehttp://www.infoq.com/articles/aerospike-qa https://gigaom.com/2014/06/24/aerospike-raises-20m-open-sources-its-in-memory-nosql-database/ http://venturebeat.com/2015/02/05/former-salesforce-engine-yard-ceo-john-dillon-joins-nosql-database-startup-aerospike/ http://siliconangle.com/blog/2014/12/19/aerospike-beefs-up-nosql-database-with-enterprise-and-hadoop-friendly-features/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/24/aerospike_database_open_source/ http://jaxenter.com/look-nosql-database-aerospike-cto-brian-bulkowski-113770.html http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2014/02/28/snapdeal-marketplace-powered-by-aerospike-in-memroy-nosql-database/ http://adexchanger.com/data-exchanges/aerospike-open-sources-its-database-raises-19-3m-in-funding/ http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/it-unmasked/aerospike-upgrades-nosql-database-running-in-memory.html http://www.informationweek.com/software/aerospike-vies-to-advance-nosql-database/d/d-id/1106039? http://www.infoworld.com/article/2898178/database/review-aerospike-kicks-scale-out-nosql-into-high-gear.html http://www.forbes.com/sites/benkepes/2015/02/05/aerospike-appoints-john-dillon-as-ceo/. This short list includes major publications such as The Register, GigaOM, Information Week, InfoWorld and Forbes. Beyond this, I found coverage of the Aerospike database (also under its earlier name, "Citrusleaf") in at least ''60 different books and scholarly articles,'' including the proceedings of several major international conferences. So, yea, there are sufficient sources to satisfy the notability criteria. This article doesn't meet the criteria for deletion under -REASON, and it would save time if {{ping|Rhododendrites}} would withdraw the nomination for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:DEL)