Deletion of Michael Hancock-Child

Comment: I would have to agree. I can't see how this would pass any of the criteria in . What sources are there were added by me. (It was originally proposed for deletion as an unreferenced BLP. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Hancock-Child&oldid=411195304) The references now there were all I could find, including searching under Nik Hancock-Child, Nicholas Hancock, etc. (the names he performed under in the past). There is one commercial recording for Marco Polo (a sub-label of Naxos), which was reviewed in ''Gramophone'' although, no comment was made on him in the review and what appears to a review of the same recording in ''Fanfare'' (Google books snippet) which does appear to mention him briefly. http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Nik%20Hancock-Child%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp The second Naxos recording is simply a compilation of previous recordings by many singers and included five of the tracks on the Marco Polo one. It is not a new or separate recording. All the rest are self-published and none of them have been reviewed. Apart from that, zero press or journal coverage. And no reviews (professional or otherwise) of any of his recitals. None of them appear to have been in major venues. His wife, Ro Hancock-Child is marginally more notable, but even there the supporting references and claims are pretty thin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: fails  spectacularly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)