Deletion of Olympic Hot Doughnuts

Comment: sources https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/heres-whats-next-for-the-olympic-doughnuts-man-at-footscray-train-station/news-story/a644e322e6a28d42b1c45c674a860ecd here, https://www.broadsheet.com.au/melbourne/cafes/footscray-olympic-doughnuts here, https://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/north-west/footscrays-famous-olympic-doughnuts-will-not-reopen/news-story/b0b4c7a0f1e24f635f47f440555bf64e here, https://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/north-west/new-footscray-business-stays-true-to-olympic-doughnuts-sweet-and-simple-formula/news-story/e5b6163046adce37de6e00c88385bcd2 here, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/melbournes-iconic-olympic-doughnuts-van-has-closed-forever-2017-1 here, https://neoskosmos.com/en/167640/in-the-heart-of-footscray-nick-tsiligiris-kindness-shines-on/ here, https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/farewell-olympic-doughnuts-thanks-for-the-memories-20170118-gtth51.html and here. The shop was also the subject of a short film http://www.tessamansfieldhung.com/shorts here. Hopefully this satisfies the need for sources, {{re|Spartaz}}. People seriously need to do a  search
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: In the scheme of an encyclopedia the listing of a now defunct business is Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill|Run-of-the-mill. The article is tagged as having |promotional wording. This would be identifiable with such wording as {{tq|the much loved business's future}} and {{tq|Even to this day, Olympic Hot Doughnuts has left a substantial legacy on Footscray, surrounding suburbs and Melbourne as a whole, with multiple Facebook fan pages for the former business still active.}}citation needed Please note: This would be a great place for a regional citation to advance notability. I am sure Mr Tsiligiris is a great person but there is a slippery slope argument (average business) to be considered other than the Wikipuffery. As a local and now defunct business I can't see how this would not fall under |what Wikipedia is not| which was a |local business in a suburb with around 16,000 people receiving local and community media attention, as opposed to regional and especially not national or international
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:YELLOWPAGES||WP:LOCAL)

Comment: I think the key failure here is  "attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary." The coverage for the article is local, and there are no incoming links from articles.  Most of the news articles are brief and local.  I am not familiar with all the sources, but they appear local to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)

Comment: DGG, I have to thoroughly disagree here. It's pretty difficult to get a single store getting that much external coverage. This is not a trivial article, it is a well known retail icon in Melbourne's history and the sources support that. I agree that most individual stores do not meet Wikipedia notability standards, but this one does. I have had no involvement in this article at all, so this is not a  suggestion. My point is that this clearly meets GNG and you should not have nominated it for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:LIKE)

Comment: seems like a local  outlet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:RUNOFTHEMILL)