Deletion of Gulden (digital currency)

Comment: I considered nominating this myself when I removed some of the cruft from the article this morning. Most of the coverage in sources has the tone of press releases and some of the other coverage is passing in nature. I'm not familiar enough with Dutch sources to be able to make a strong statement in support of deleting, but at least some of the sources do seem like cryptoblogs. We really need to hammer out a guideline for cryptocurrencies and related topics. For now, this does not seem to quite meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Fails . The one source I found that actually talks about the company is listed as a scam when I went looking for reviews. Search of Google, Google Books, Google News has nothing significant about the Gulden. Of the sources cited above, the ones I checked look like they mention Gulden, but not talk ''in depth'' about the comapny itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGCRIT)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: does not meet  / ; significant RS coverage not found.  per review of available sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT||WP:NORG||WP:TOOSOON)