Deletion of Guillaume Bianchi

Comment: One podium finish at, as Papaursa points out, a fourth tier event isn't close to meeting the requirement that athletes have "competed at the highest level".  Success as a junior also doesn't meet this standard, which is why junior success generally doesn't show notability.  The Universiade competition is the same (limits on competitors). Coverage appears to be routine sports reporting of results and fails to meet the GNG. The editors voting to keep the article, all of whom are pretty new to AfD discussions, are ignoring , , and  while relying on , , and incorrect interpretations of what it takes to be a notable athlete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:ROUTINE||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: He does not seem to meet .  Coverage is predominantly about the Universiade games, which can be considered routine sports reporting and also .   seems to apply until his adult preformances become notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT||WP:BLP1E||WP:TOOSOON)