Deletion of Ernie the Giant Chicken

Comment: Delete, as prev discussion - not independently notable outside of the show itself; lacking coverage in independent sources; hence |original research. Add a redir to List of characters in Family Guy afterwards, I suppose. But - not |notable enough for inclusion as an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:GNG)

Comment: The subject of the article does not meet the criteria of the |general notability guideline since it has no significant coverage in #Reliable_sources_and_other_principles|reliable third-party sources, only trivial mentions in reference to the episodes where it has appeared. None of the references in the reception section of the article treats in detail "Ernie the Giant Chicken" as a subject, but rather the references are reviews of ''Family Guy'' episodes or a single mention in a trivia-like article, so no reference in the article shows |notability for "Ernie the Giant Chicken
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: http://uk.stars.ign.com/articles/890/890465p1.html This article and http://uk.tv.ign.com/articles/987/987014p6.html this article from IGN provide nontrivial coverage about Ernie the Giant Chicken. These third-party reliable sources do, in my opinion, address the concerns raised by {{user|Jfgslo}} — ''"None of the references in the reception section of the article treats in detail "Ernie the Giant Chicken" as a subject, but rather the references are reviews of ''Family Guy'' episodes or a single mention in a trivia-like article, so no reference in the article shows |notability for "Ernie the Giant Chicken".''The articles each provide three paragraphs of coverage about Ernie the Giant Chicken's role and history on the show. A short quote from the latter article: Ernie is as consistent as he is unrelenting. His MO is as follows: Interrupt episode mid-scene, furrow his brow, narrow his beak, and proceed to beat the living hell out of Peter....For a rivalry that started over a coupon, Ernie has become a welcomed addition to the Family Guy brand of funny. Sure, he's one-note, but, again, you &#61; wrongness if that one joke doesn't make you laugh every time. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I believe there is enough material here to justify a stand-alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Still no |independent, third-party coverage (episode guides and ''Family Guy'' tie-in products certainly notwithstanding). The only grounds I can see for a ''Keep'' is consensus on fictional character notability having changed, which I don't think has happened. Yet
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: That was an older version, and while I can't see it, this version has plenty of 3rd party coverage, including a book, to meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)