Deletion of Stephanie Strom

Comment: Yes the nomination points out that sources exist for biographical sketch. Hence this passes either  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:GNG)

Comment: Source #3 is a ''NYT'' interview with their own reporter, #1 is an interview, which is iffy as a |rs and even iffier for establishing notability as interviews are "both primary and non-independent" (), but of course the fact that ''edible Manhattan'' thought to interview them could be construed as contributing to notability. However, reading the introduction and interview, it is clear that the article isn't about her, but about food. Sure it talks a bit about her work, but the title tells all: "In the Kitchen with Stephanie Strom". It's really more about cooking then it is an in-depth profile of her life. Source #2 is a very short mention of her leaving the ''Times'' in a rather minor website (No wikipedia article). So in summary, three sources, none of which is clearly significant, reliable, ''and'' independent. Sourcing not in this article is all passing mentions, so she seems to fail  and . May satisfy  if it can be substantiated outside of a https://livingmaxwell.com/organic-insider-stephanie-strom-nyt blog's claim that she was "the most influential food business journalist in the country", but I don't really see that happening
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:INTERVIEW||WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:NJOURNALIST)

Comment: Passes the minimum bar for notability per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)