Deletion of Orgenetics

Comment: the "author" |(ahem) throws  in the way, claims facts from the company's website |(cough), and is admitting that the article violates policies but it should not matter because it is a niche product. Well, indeed, we rarely apply  to companies because of that very reason (most companies have a specific audience) but I still fail to see how this passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ownership of content (WP:OWN||WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:PSTS||WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fails  for lack of independent coverage. This is Wikipedia's criterion for whether or not the subject qualifies for inclusion in an international encyclopedia. We call it "notability" which is not really a good term, because of course all business owners think their company is "notable"; maybe "coverage" would be a better name for it. But call it what you like, that is the requirement
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)