Deletion of Till Tantau (2nd nomination)

Comment: Citation record is clearly not enough for #C1. Both beamer and tikz are important latex packages but per  I would want to see reliable sources with some nontrivial detail about his role in creating them (and not just what they are and how to use them) if we are to use their creation as the basis for notability; the primary sources we have now are certainly not good enough
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:INHERITED)

Comment: His LaTeX packages are well known, but the man himself is not" confuses notability with celebrity. (Without |waxing too much, we have numerous articles on significantly more obscure figures in the programming language community that have handily survived AfD, like Mark Jason Dominus or Audrey Tang.) As David said tikz, beamer, etal are important cogs in the LaTeX machinery and importance/impact of work implies notability of its creator. I think this should be a simple case of finding items in the published literature that attribute these packages to him and document their importance. The article could then at least be a legitimate stub. I'll have a go at it and I hope that the panelists here might then have another look at it. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:WAX)