Deletion of Wrike (3rd nomination)

Comment: Company and software have extensive coverage. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucerogers/2014/10/15/andrew-filevs-wrike-wants-to-bring-project-management-and-collaboration-to-the-masses/#598f68265dd6 This one is from a Forbes staff writer and http://www.pcworld.com/article/2603720/wrike-boosts-reporting-capabilities-of-its-social-project-management-software.html this one is from the news editor at PC World. Meets  and . While nominator is correct it was deleted in the past, the most recent nomination shows withdrawn after 2 keep !votes
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: The available press coverage is sufficient for notability. The article used to be much longer with many more references - see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wrike&oldid=779746172  10 May 2017. The article would benefit from critical perspectives instead of just including positive information about the company, but as  says: "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)