Deletion of Radu Sardescu

Comment: but as you rightly point out, he passes  so he's notable enough for inclusion, period.  So on what grounds should the article be deleted?  The policy is there to provide a yardstick against which we measure articles, and he measures up.  I don't care two hoots about him, and I'll probably never look at the article again after today, but that's not the point.  I added cats and stub template to make a small start on improvement
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: he ''fails'' , as stated by a lot of users above - Rapid II does ''not'' play in a fully professional league
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: meets the  notability guideline.  In the absence of any other deletion rationale, I have to say "Keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)