Deletion of Séralini affair

Comment: the Séralini affair is certainly |notable, and there's no shortage of respectable independent sources which discuss the issue, so it shouldn't be hard to write a |neutral article. However, "neutral" doesn't necessarily mean "only saying good stuff"; independent sources generally point out flaws in Séralini's "research" so we shouldn't shy away from that. Just look at Bogdanov Affair, Andrew Wakefield, Hwang Woo-suk &c - instead of deleting those pages, we ''write neutral content
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOV)

Comment: or '''rename''', or '''merge''' to genetically modified food controversies in case of low notability, although with about 60 s problems with notability are very unlikely. BTW, I hardly believe that nomination of this article to ''deletion'' is possible in a good faith
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)