Deletion of Poplar Creek Crossing (2nd nomination)

Comment: The first two sources from the previous AfD clearly talk about Poplar Creek Crossing in more-than-trivial terms. The other two are harder to judge. It doesn't help that all four sources are behind paywalls, but |that's no reason to consider the sources trivial
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:PAYWALL)

Comment: Relisting because nobody is discussion sourcing (or lack of such) and to be sure that |consensus really has changed
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CCC)

Comment: it really needs work. In short intro paragraph, it manages to have mutliple WP issues, including 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Currently just a |directory of current shops at the mall
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)