Deletion of Superkombat Fighting Championship

Comment: I have been involved in some, but not all, of the previous AfD discussions and I'd like to make a few points based on the comments I'm reading here.  The fact that this promotion's main article has had 3 previous deletion discussions is an indication that its notability is highly questioned, but doesn't mean it should automatically be deleted again (if its sourcing has been significantly improved).  Most of the article's current sources appear to be routine sports reporting of results and fight announcements, which is insufficient to show notability.  Some of the claims of being notable also focus on being nominated for some "promotion of the year awards" which are of dubious notability.  Also, claiming the promotion is notable because of who has fought in one of its events runs afoul of .  I would propose that those who claim this promotion is notable simply list a few of the articles that show significant, independent coverage in reliable sources.  If the promotion is as notable as claimed, these should not be hard to find.  If they can't be found, then Superkombat doesn't meet  and is not WP notable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)