Deletion of Sustainability 2.0

Comment: The term does appear to be used, but whether it was really coined by this book, I am unsure. That claim is unreferenced. Then we have a definition sourced to https://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/14066-The-Birth-of-Sustainability-2-0-Thoughts-from-Sustainable-Brands-International-2008 a press release. Then another definition sourced to a minor trade magazine (https://www.dbs.com/sustainability/insights/article-sustainability-2-the-way-forward). And a CITEBOMB of 'works that use this term'. I think this merits a . The topic may be notable, but the execution is terrible; this should be written from scratch using reliable, academic sources. PS. See related AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernesto van Peborgh (2nd nomination) - article claims he is the author of this term
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: It's an obvious enough |term to coin that it's doubtless been invented many times independently, and the different coinages won't necessarily all have the same meaning. It's not our job to sort out that kind of thing; we're not lexicographers tracing the history of a word through primary sources. Also, frankly, the sources are pretty garbage. A LinkedIn blog post? SlideShare? 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM||WP:TNT)