Deletion of App-O-Rama

Comment: The article does not appear promotional, it describes a term that seems fairly popular, at least according to google.  However, still fails , because of these reasons: ''The first is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and so articles simply attempting to define a neologism are inappropriate.  The second reason is that articles on neologisms frequently attempt to track the emergence and use of the term as observed in communities of interest or on the internet — without attributing these claims to reliable secondary sources. If the article is not verifiable (see Reliable sources for neologisms, below) then it constitutes analysis, synthesis and original research and consequently cannot be accepted by Wikipedia. This is true even though there may be many examples of the term in use
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Even if it isn't promotional, it still fails . ''"... is a term that refers to a strategy of completing multiple applications in a relatively short period of time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Part |neologism |dic def. Part #Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information|how-to guide. Part |spamvertisment. There's at least a little copyvio going on from http://app-o-rama.com/ here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:DICDEF||WP:NOT||WP:SPAM)

Comment: neologistic spewage, borders on , I don't think any amount of extra time is going to be able to save this steaming pile.  Only evidence of anything resembling notability is also evidence of it's blatantly spammy nature (in other words, remove the spam link and the whole thing falls apart
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BOLLOCKS)