Deletion of HD 95338

Comment: While maybe  isn't the correct deletion criteria, I do agree with the general assertion of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: I agree what '''HD 95338''' contents do not meet notability criteria in , but should notice the situation is typical for most newly discovered planetary systems, while i cannot find any criteria applicable to '''HD 95338''' in . Also, the  notability criteria for '''HD 95338''' will be meet in future after 2nd publication. 2nd publication is virtually certain given solid observational evidence in preprint and somewhat anomalous nature of planet '''HD 95338 b''' mandating follow-up study in years to come. Formally, i.m.h.o. deletion proposal falls to Wikipedia:Overzealous_deletion#Article_quality case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTCRIT||WP:TOOSOON||WP:NASTCRIT)

Comment: Is there a reason this has no entry at List of stars in Vela? Doesn't seem like there's an  bar to inclusion there and an entry exists in Template:Stars of Vela, unless there's some  discussion I'm unaware of that dictates otherwise. Initial analysis is that it seems like a very small amount of this should be smerged to the list with a possible spin-out later if multiple publications eventually end up providing SIGCOV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LSC||WP:ASTRO)