Deletion of Island Cricket (2nd nomination)

Comment: Non notable, doesn't pass  completely. Articles are kept based on existence of, or proven evidence of sources not blind assumption. More popular and more authoritative website on Cricket, i.e Cricket  Archive was recently deleted due to lack of ''sufficient sources'' not even lack of sources at all. To give rough comparison, CricketArchive was widely used across Wikipedia to support Cricket Articles (See Special: LinkSearch/https://cricketarchive.com|How many times it's is cited on Wikipedia) and compare with (Special:LinkSearch/http://island-cricket.com|the Island Cricket's number) which doesn't even have secure website yet. Further, CA has far better Alexa rank than this one, and at least one academic sources (if I remember correctly) but all these didn't save it. Fancy website design cannot establish notability for this one also. I agree its homepage is well designed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NWEB)