Deletion of Taichung Municipal Taichung Girls' Senior High School

Comment: Due to the lack of available sourcing that it would need to pass  or . Since all that comes up about it from what I can tell is a puff piece by Epoch Times. Which is both trivial as an article and likely from a non-reputable source anyway. The ones in the Chinese article don't cut it either. Otherwise, where are the in-depth reliable sources that are claimed exist about this? Because I'm more then willing to change my vote to keep if anyone can come up with them. In the meantime, I don't think articles about run of the mill things like the principle not running for reelection and dead links cut it for notability though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG)

Comment: Fails  and even if this is deleted there will still be an article on the Chinese Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSCHOOL)

Comment: the state of the article isn't relative to this discussion. As the above editor has found sources, we must keep it.  is policy. Notability hinges on the available sources for the subject, not the references on the article. As with the vast majority of school articles nominated for deletion in the past six months, this nomination ignores that. It also ignores that according to Wikipedia's mission statement, we are supposed to be a gazetteer. Schools are important structures included in most gazetteers. Special:Contributions/174.254.193.114|174.254.193.114
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)