Deletion of Michael Charles Glennon

Comment: as "non-public" seems inappropriate for someone with as many |reliable sources writing about him as there are.http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1509160.htmhttp://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200511/s1509160.htmhttp://www.poynter.org/dg.lts/id.46/aid.50861/column.htm The article should not simply be "he's a paedophile and here's who he molested" but detail the zigs and zags of one of Australia's more notorious sex-abuse cases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)