Deletion of Cheating in Counter-Strike (2nd nomination)

Comment: with prejeduce to all other strategy guides per  a stategy guide or a place for external links (which there are many at the bottom), all articles must have |reliable sources (which doesn't include forums), and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: this. Merits a couple of paragraphs in the main article and perhaps one more in an article on cheeting in games. We are  a HOWTO nor a history of howtoing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per Proto's excellent arguments, and mainly per . &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: per Proto's outstanding comments.  This is in violation of , and is an original research magnet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Where have you been for the past while? ''EVERYTHING'' needs to pass  and , otherwise it gets trashed. After 18 times, that's what got the GNAA. There is |no original research allowed at Wikipedia. None. Zilch
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NOR)