Deletion of Andrew Manley

Comment: It seems odd that there is a presumption of non-notability, regardless of how many independent and reliable sources have in depth coverage, if the person is a high school athlete. I question "inherent non-notability" as much as "inherent notability." The special  provisions for athletes in the guideline  do not absolutely forbid articles if the high school athlete has enough coverage to clearly satisfy  for any other person. See http://archives.starbulletin.com/2007/11/28/sports/story04.html, http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/print?id=4017928&type=blogEntry
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: per the sources found by ChildofMidnight and Edison. Yes, this high school athlete fails , but as Edison pointed out above, failing that guideline doesn't automatically mean that Manley fails . The multiple independent reliable sources provided show that Manley passes |the general notability guideline
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: as per  - I don't see notability for anything else or a whole pile of articles about him
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATH)