Deletion of Pro Wrestling Kids' Style

Comment: Please see .  Those arguing keep need to point to the multiple, reliable, nontrivial, independent sources specified by 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:BOOK)

Comment: So you expect people to believe that you're a journalist when you've just posted "Having spoke with Mr. Crossen"?  You've made dozens of the crudest grammatical errors throughout these discussions, and yet you continue to claim that you are a professional journalist.  Also, if Crossen "really doesn't care about Wikipedia," then how do you explain this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Scrossen And this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scrossen So were you using Crossen's name when you started posting here four years ago "as a journalist"?  Or was that Crossen "himself"?  Either way, you've already admitted that your only purpose here is to promote Crossen, which is a direct violation of our  policy.  And yes, vanity-press "publication" IS a matter to consider under .  You act like WP policies are things that others are just making up, instead of actual policies that you are violating.  The larger problem with vanity-press "publications," of course, is that they are a fraud upon the reading public, because nowhere on the cover or on the spine or inside the book does it state that the only reason the book exists is because the author paid to have it printed.  You claim to be a journalist who is very interested in promoting a vanity-press book, but if you actually believe that there are any real journalists out there in the world who care anything about promoting vanity-press books, then you haven't looked too closely at the proffered sources in the very article you're defending--not one single article by a professional journalist!--which means not even one by YOU.  Are we to believe that a professional journalist who is interested in promoting this book would promote it only on Wikipedia, and nowhere else in the world?  None of this adds up, and I don't buy any of it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM||WP:BK)

Comment: Since Qworty has demonstrated on this and other related discussions, it is apparent he is in violations of ,  and .  Since he is so big on following the rules of wikipedia, perhaps he should start with these three just to name a few.  If he acts like this all the time, perhaps a  is in order. --Special:Contributions/97.83.174.67|97.83.174.67
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:NICE||WP:PA||WP:HA||WP:CDB)

Comment: There is nothing here to satisfy .  Anybody with a pulse can pay AuthorHouse to print a book, then donate the book to libraries, then come to Wikipedia as a  to create M articles to promote oneself.  That is not how notability is established.  And then, of course, it's no surprise that the only voice to defend the M should come from an anonymous ISP in the guy's hometown
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK||WP:SPA||WP:SPAM||WP:SPAM)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)