Deletion of Joe Biden sexual assault allegation

Comment: There’s a paragraph devoted to an anonymous call 27 years ago to ''Larry King Live'' with a "potential" reference, that Tara claims was made by her mother. If an encyclopedia has to resort to this, we have a problem. A spinoff article of this type requires sustained coverage by RS. I subscribe to two RS print papers and have the news on much of the day and have barely heard of this. If charges are filed, or high-quality sources give the allegation serious attention, review this. If there is anything worth saving, merge it. If consensus is keep,  it.   
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:POVFORK||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: 5 days ago a deletion discussion was closed. Per , {{tq|After a deletion debate concludes and there is no consensus or the consensus is in favor of keeping the page, users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating the same page for deletion again, to give editors the time to improve the page. Renominations shortly after the earlier debate are generally closed quickly. It can be disruptive to repeatedly nominate a page in the hope of getting a different outcome
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DPAFD)

Comment: Clear . There is a substantial (and growing) section on the Joe Biden article, which is where it belongs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)