Deletion of Enterprise marketing management (2nd nomination)

Comment: to Marketing automation. Marketing automation (MA) is a good target, except for the fact that Enterprise marketing management (EMM) is not discussed in that article. In fact EMM is a type of marketing automation, but not synomynous with it. Merging the content of the EMM article, or a subset of it, along with the reliable sources included, would improve the MA article and preserve verifiable content per  our policy of . A merge of verifiable content would be preferred over deletion according to our policy in . "Keep" would be fine, too, as there is demonstrated notability, but a merge to provide context for the stub is a reasonable compromise. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: anywhere mentioned by another user. Deleting permanently is not the right way to go, especially considering it was relisted here at AfD due to issues with the first deletion. Retaining edit history may be useful, and  definitely favors this
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Fails on  grounds
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)