Deletion of Vimb

Comment: I see the point that  is not a reason to keep, I agree, but to me otability is given for the following reasons
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:USEFUL||WP:N)

Comment: per |Why we have the notability requirements there isn't the signficant coverage in reliable secondary sources needed to establish notability and source a full article. If such sources don't exist, the article cannot be improved to satisfy the inclusion criterea for Wikipedia. It may be that at some point in the future this topic is covered for example in books or reviewed in reliable secondary sources online, and then if  is satsified this article can be recreated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WHYN||WP:GNG)

Comment: on account of subject failing the |notability criteria of Wikipedia. Irrelevant justifications are invoked above for non-deletion: In reality, it is not enough by itself that an article might be |"useful";  |self-published sources are ERROR|null and void as evidence of notability; and |Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate listing of information, where users find everything under the sun. Without |proper attribution, texts do not make it. Or eventually get deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:USEFUL||WP:PRIMARY||WP:NERROR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RS)