Deletion of Yun-Tae Kim

Comment: per  and  #2 (pursuant to the footnote: {{tq|A politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists.}}). Notability is the key concern here, but the nom doesn't explain why the article shouldn't be viewed as notable. The article does give references (and indeed it gave references when it was nominated for deletion). In combination with the references :ko:김윤태 (정치인)|at the Korean Wikipedia I think these establish notability. The subject doesn't seem to pass muster purely on , but just going from the sources here and on the Korean wiki we have multiple feature-length articles in reliable news sources (including a significant regional news source and :ko:뉴스1|News1, a major national news agency), coverage in Korea's official news agency Yonhap News, and a feature-length interview in the ''Jeonbuk Ilbo'', a major regional paper. So it seems to pass the basic notability criteria. Hopefully this also serves as a reply to {{u|GeneralizationsAreBad}} above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:NPOL||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: notable per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)