Deletion of Motorola C139

Comment: A quick http://www.google.com.sg/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=100&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Motorola+C139&as_oq=&as_eq=wikipedia&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=image google search shows up more than 2 million hits for this model. It is also possible to |verify the contents of this article as well. --|S
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:ESP)

Comment: The number of search hits is irrelevant as the vast majority are listings on websites offering them for sale. People asking how a cellphone can be notable are really offering an argument for deletion: if it's not notable, it shouldn't have an article as per , and more specifically . The fact that there are other articles on other non-notable phones is not an argument to keep this one, but rather to list the other ones as well. Phones ''can'' be notable, as per Zchris87v's comment above, but this one isn't, and the fact that the article doesn't look like an advertisement does nothing to change that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CORP)

Comment: Per #DIRECTORY. Although it's a product of a large mobile phone company, it doesn't seem to have any unique or revolutionary design, features or sales or marketing campaign (or mentions in popular culture etc.) that gives it notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This is indeed covered in reliable sources and therefore passes   and . In addition to the three reviews cited in the article there is also http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/6888.html this, which I will add to the refs. Does 4 count as multiple? Mr. Google News shows 84 more http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=%22motorola+c139%22&btnG=Search+Archives&num=10&lr=lang_en&as_price=p0&lr= here but  no longer claims that particular requirement anyway
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V||WP:N)