Deletion of Riskified

Comment: When you take away the routine funding announcements and brief mentions, there are sources that meet . https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-paying-for-fast-shipping-could-get-you-flagged-as-a-fraudster-1524139200 The Wall Street Journal piece is not a blog post in the typical sense of the word. It is written by a staff writer who says has been employed there since 2013. Other significant coverage includes https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Business-and-Innovation/The-immigrant-story-at-the-heart-of-Israels-fraud-fighting-start-up-569092 Jerusalem Post, https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Meet-the-Israeli-anti-fraud-start-up-that-protects-shoppers-542327 another JP, and https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-riskified-tackles-credit-card-fraud-1001251299 Globes to name a few. The page itself needs cleaned up and stripped of the promo, but it certainly meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)

Comment: Does not meet ; significant  coverage not found. Just a promotional directory listing.  per review of available sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: None of the sources meet the criteria for establishing notabilty. https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-riskified-tackles-credit-card-fraud-1001251299 The Globes article is an interview with the founders, not intellectually independent, fails . https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Business-and-Innovation/The-immigrant-story-at-the-heart-of-Israels-fraud-fighting-start-up-569092 Both this Jerusalem Post reference and https://www.jpost.com/Jpost-Tech/Meet-the-Israeli-anti-fraud-start-up-that-protects-shoppers-542327 this one are classic chrurnalism - faux "profiles" complete with the usual photo/quotes/vision/growth/funding structure but, you know, no actual "news", fails as not being intellectually independent, fails .  https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2018/04/your-online-purchase-might-get-declined-for-no-reason-anyone-is-willing-to-tell-you/ The MotherJones reference is the best of a bad lot but it is merely commenting on the WSJ reference and doesn't provide and in-depth information on the company and fails . This company obviously has a marketing dept but the topic does not appear to be notable and fails  and GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)