Deletion of Humpty Dumptyism

Comment: When citing sources, say where ''you'' got it - . Some of the other editors and I do not have access to the hard-copy books being cited for verification
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: Refer to my original vote, where I searched for sources and located the term in Wiktionary. As for the article in it's current state (and has been since creation in November 2005), the stub consists of a one-sentence definition of the term, followed by where it was derived from. The quoted passage from ''Through the Looking-Glass'' does not actually state ''"Humpty Dumptyism"'' nor ''"Humpty Dumpty Principle"'' so while I can see where the term would originate from, it's not actually declared in the passage. Finally, the link to wsrpa.net is down and I am unable to find a cached copy of what the external link is referencing, and the only cited source is a link to an online copy of ''Through the Looking-Glass''; hardly a secondary source, and as mentioned above does not declare the term.I understand the |dictionary policy I quoted, which states "stubs that cannot possibly be expanded beyond perpetual stub status should be either renamed, merged, or refactored into articles with wider scope, that can be expanded beyond perpetual stub status, or deleted if it cannot be renamed, merged, or refactored." This topic is already covered in Humpty Dumpty#References in popular culture|Humpty Dumpty, an article which has far more inlinks and substantially more than 19 edits in over a year and a half
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD)

Comment: Impossible to verify beyond the citation from Lewis Carroll.  Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this |neologism does not meet , much less 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:RS||WP:N)

Comment: WP:NOT#DICT|Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Fails criteria 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:VERIFY)

Comment: Although there are now sources, |Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and I really doubt this stub definition has the potential to become an encyclopedia article. The definition was transwikied to Wiktionary in Feb, so I still stand behind my delete vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WINAD)