Deletion of Rojina Shrestha

Comment: Lacks in depth coverage and is 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOSOON)

Comment: There are several concerns about this nomination.  The first is the bundling of two distinct articles into a single nomination.  Was this done simply because they are both women from Nepal?  If so, that's a terrible reason for bundling nominations.  Especially so, given that one of the subjects is a delegate to a minor regional pageant, but the other is a delegate to the Miss Universe pageant.  The latter has an annual global viewership of something on the order of 1 billion people and the deletion discussion for that person is likely to proceed along different lines.  I encourage the nominator to withdraw the second name and open up a separate discussion for that second article.As for the rationales for deletion, it's puzzling that the nominator cites , because neither subject's "claim to fame" is as a model.  Equally inapplicable is the appeal to .  So that leaves only the observation that there are no reliable sources out there.  Maybe so, but both subjects are from Nepal and in-country sources are more likely to be in the Nepali language and written in the Devanagari script.  Is the nominator telling us that there are no useful sources in that script?  Would the nominator be willing to back that up with a second search template using the subjects' names written in the Devanagari script?  If not, then it's difficult to see how a proper  has been done
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NMODEL||WP:BLP1E||WP:BEFORE)