Deletion of Rohit K Dasgupta

Comment: Seems to pass , in my opinion. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/kolkata-youth-now-a-london-councillor/articleshow/64047398.cms This article about the subject in ''The Times of India'' and https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170503/jsp/calcutta/story_149480.jsp these https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170608/jsp/nation/story_155772.jsp two in the Calcutta ''The Telegraph (Calcutta)|Telegraph'' would represent significant coverage in reliable sources. Beyond that, the subject is a prolific author of academic texts for which Google Scholar is full of citations and reviews
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While his H-index seems a bit on the low side for , this is also a rather specialized area in which he's working and I could see it would be reasonable it is high enough to pass the guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: It seems like there are several reliable independent sources that reference the topic, and this person has done several things that have been mentioned in many different online newspapers and such. I would definitely say it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I'm less familiar with UK politics than I should be - how big of a position is a councillor? He only got 1,965 votes, and it doesn't appear anyone ran against him (three candidates ran for three spots.) It appears he fails . I haven't looked to see if he passes  or . There have been a couple feature articles on his losing candidacy, but the articles are actually about him, which makes  pretty borderline. I typically would vote delete in this situation if he only had a political notability claim, but will leave this for now in case he's a notable professor
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Article could use some work, but passes . It's possible he passes  too, looking at citing patterns of his work: https://scholar.google.co.nz/scholar?cites=4484751048026459406&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en 1, https://scholar.google.co.nz/scholar?cites=6544463517719445884&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=en 2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: per  - borderline as an academic, borderline as a politician, but all together clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)