Deletion of Cate Edwards (3rd nomination)

Comment: Has notable parents, but there's no such thing as notability-by-association.  Fails  and .  Perhaps she'll become notable in the future, but has not done so yet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: to John Edwards#Family. When we talk about |notability not being inherited with regard to relatives of famous people, it should be noted that there are some people who have become the subjects of intense media attention mostly because of their relationship to famous people and not anything they have done themselves (example: David Kennedy). In such cases, the significant media coverage of the relative may be enough to satisfy |the general notability guideline. But Cate Edwards has not come under such intense media attention. Instead, she has merely received some incidental media coverage due to her connections to her parents. Therefore, we should redirect this article, leaving the possibility of re-creation open should she achieve sufficient notability
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: she has a nice job, did well in school, and is engaged to her boyfriend.  Her parents should be proud of her, but she's done nothing notable in the encyclopedic sense.  We need to be extremely careful with articles on kids of politicians and such as they often turn into  minefields
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)