Deletion of Robert Provan

Comment: with a tentative preference to '''Rename''' the article to be about the case, following the guidelines at , and pending responses to my question above. The sources are in many cases about him, and when a person is profiled in several major publications it becomes less clear whether it's the person or the event that should have an article.  says we should default to the incident, though. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E||WP:1E)

Comment: Maybe I'm missing some crucial points, but it seems like if we have a case of , the next logical question is whether it can be turned into an article about that one event (the case) -- or whether it already exists. I see it's come up a few times, but most arguments are still about the BLP. Is there strong ''opposition'' to turning this into an article about the case? Doing so would benefit from, but is not dependent upon, folks from WikiProject Law, who can always renominate the case article if it's inappropriate. Seems like the best option to keep the content without keeping the biography. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:1E)