Deletion of KZYY-LP

Comment: and how hard did you study  and ?  There's not a single in-depth story about the story
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BROADCAST)

Comment: ping|Onel5969}} https://tylerpaper.com/lifestyle/faith/spreading-hope-spanish-language-churches-want-to-share-gospel-encourage/article_054c9176-dc69-5b89-b89d-502a1b0d97df.html This is a "brief mention"?  If you took "How hard did you all look?" as snark, then you haven't heard snark.  Believe me, that isn't snark.  That was an honest question.  You. Didn't. Look.  Now you are fighting with me, snark fully included to cover that fact.  You "reviewed" the article and immediately nom'd it for deletion.  You didn't look for ''any'' SIGCON yourself, you left that  to the community.  I know a deletionist when I see one, a snarky one too.  One who can't be faced with the fact that there is SIGCON in a local newspaper and you can't mention it because that would prove you wrong.  Snarky enough for ya
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN)

Comment: Subject is a licensed radio station that is an originator of its own programming, and thus meets . This is verifiable through reliable sources independent of the subject. Furthermore, it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, as is evident by the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST)

Comment: Radio stations do have to have sources, which this does, but there is no requirement in  that the sources have to attain whatever standard of in-depth analysis Onel is applying here over and above what these sources already show. The principle at NMEDIA is that, and this is an ''exact quote'' from NMEDIA, "As media outlets are themselves a significant proportion of our sources for other content, however, it serves an important purpose for Wikipedia to provide neutral and verifiable information about those sources so that readers are able to evaluate their reliability and scope. Accordingly, the notability standards for media organizations and content are designed to be as inclusive, not restrictive, as possible within the bounds of verifiability in reliable sources." Would it be nice if every radio station on earth had at least one full book written about its entire history by a professional radio historian? Sure, of course it would. But the existence of such a book is not a core requirement for a radio station to be notable: the requirements are that the station has a broadcast license from the appropriate regulatory authority for its country, that it has originated at least some of its own programming instead of operating strictly as a rebroadcaster of another station, that it is actually on the air and not just a silent paper license or construction permit, and that all three of those facts are verifiable in sources independent of itself. And this station passes all four of those conditions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BCAST)