Deletion of List of WikiLeaks mirrors

Comment: as per . linkfarms just create more a bigger mess to maintain. The urls are not stable to be useful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCATALOG)

Comment: it's a linkfarm.   applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSUSEFULL)

Comment: While the first part of the article is OK in my mind, it quickly gets very biased, and I really don't see how it could be fixed while maintaining the article. Also, there are many people opposing per  - I do so as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:LINKFARM)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not a directory or a linkfarm, nor a soapbox. Take political advocacy efforts elsewhere
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per  and . In addition, if the real WikiLeaks site goes down, the mirrors wouldn't work right either, would they? '''Erpert
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:LINKFARM||WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: per . In addition, a list such as this is very hard to keep updated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:LINKFARM)

Comment: but gut the content. Once the lists of external links to non-notable providers are stripped out per  and , anything left can easily be merged into the main article. Most of the actual content is already covered at WikiLeaks#Hosting anyway
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:LINKFARM||WP:IINFO)