Deletion of 2011–12 FK Željezničar season

Comment: The nomination itself has a fatal flaw -  has absolutely nothing to do with the professionalism of the league, which is a rough guideline from , which also allows for top level articles. The Željezničar articles would be fine if they had properly referenced prose. I've added a very brief bit of sourced prose to the 2011–12 season, which they won the Bosnian double and which clearly passes . There was a college seasons article I nominated for failing  which was kept since the season ultimately passed  I'm trying to find. I think it's Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1979–80 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men&#39;s basketball team. Basically, I'm a weak keep for most of these, even though all of them currently fail , based on that policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SEASONS||WP:GNG||WP:NOTSTATS||WP:GNG||WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: I think these AfDs may need to be broken down into smaller batches. For example, I suspect the main nomination, 2011–12 FK Željezničar season, may likely pass  given that the team won the domestic double and competed in the Europa League. The lack of prose is not a reason for deletion given that Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup|Deletion is not cleanup
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: These seasons were all seasons in top-flight of Bosnian football, and deleting them would go against , as technically, these were all significant seasons in these clubs' history. Technically speaking, most seasons of any sports team (notably those where they finish mediocre in all competitions) would fail , however, nobody is going to delete them as they all have some significance to the team's history. The argument that these seasons weren't "professional" is flawed as the Top 4 teams automatically qualified for European competition, meaning that UEFA recognized the winners as the domestic champions and allowed them (and the 3 teams that finished below them) to compete in arguably, the most professional soccer competition in the world. I also agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOSTATS)

Comment: Nomination appears incorrect - it's not difficult to quickly find significant Bosnian media coverage for some of these seasons - even some English coverage such as https://www.thestar.com.my/sport/football/2015/05/31/vincent-tan-celebrates-sarajevo-win/ this. While the  guideline may not be met, it's not relevant given that  is easily met. Articles should be improved and expanded, not deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:GNG)

Comment: per  failure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS)

Comment: to FK Željezničar Sarajevo per  and . I don't see the lack of professional status as being particularly germane here. While NSEASONS does suggest that teams in top professional leagues qualify for individual season articles, it doesn't require professionalism. Instead, it has a fairly lengthy section considering notability for a specific subset of non-professional sport (i.e., US college sport) which concludes that there are certain circumstances in which they can be notable. In this particular case, we have a national championship winning season in both the country's and the world's most popular sport, with a league that was ranked higher by UEFA than some fully professional leagues. Lack of professionalism should not be a factor here. However, the article in its current state is nothing but stats and records, which certainly is a factor. This should be redirected to the parent article for now, but without prejudice on recreation if anyone cares to research and write a proper prose version of the article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSEASONS||WP:NOTSTATS)