Deletion of Simone Otis (2nd nomination)

Comment: as a recreation, but even if not it clearly doesn't meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: for several reasons. In fact I initially speedily deleted the article, but then I decided that since this AfD has been started, we may as well allow it to be discussed. The article is promotional, it fails to demonstrate notability (despite an attempt to saturate it with numerous unsuitable references: see ). It is also sufficiently similar to the article deleted at Articles for deletion/Simone Otis that it could be considered to qualify for speedy deletion as a repost. ('''Note:''' This is one of a group of articles created and re-created by single purpose accounts, all of whose editing has been promotion for one "management company" and its clients.) ''The editor who uses the pseudonym
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Citation overkill (WP:BOMBARD)