Deletion of List of programmes broadcast by Cartoon Network (UK & Ireland)

Comment: Content could certainly be culled and the crufters as usual have made a mess of things (I would kill the movie section right off; zero sources and it's easily assumed that they carry all Warner Bros.-Hanna Barbera films, and I have addressed the nom's concern by killing that line and the as-per-usual unsourced "Upcoming" line which is just  material and has no place in a historical article). However the nominator has not stated a specific reason for deletion and I'm unsure why deletion is being asked for besides a non-specific cite to a policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)

Comment: because I don't think a valid reason for deletion has been stated.  The portion of  that Alan Liefting is referring to specifically says it doesn't apply to lists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTLINK)

Comment: edit conflict) I personally hate lists like this, and if I were in the mood to say screw community consensus I hate this stuff, I'd vote delete, but it meets multiple criteria at , and |it's useless is not a valid argument. I don't think saying that it "violates the spirit of " is valid, either, in that that's an incredibly vague argument.  lists a number of largely unrelated (that is, not connected to an overarching theme or "spirit") and ''very specific'' things that Wikipedia isn't. It's also a living thing, so it can change to include something reflective of this particular list, but I don't think it currently covers this list, and unless the nominator can effectively argue that it does I'm not inclined to agree with the rationale
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:LISTPURP||WP:ITSUSELESS||WP:NOT||WP:NOT)