Deletion of Communist terrorism (2nd nomination)

Comment: per Guy. See . POV forking is not an approved method of dealing with content disputes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: Quite clearly POV fork. Wikipedia is not |soapbox. I am |assuming good faith and will try to be |civil as much as possible in a hostile environment, but what I can guess the article was written with political motivation by right-wing pro-capitalist agenda pushers. The keep votes are bad faith votes, very likely based on political motivation. I can see there is a systematic anti-Communist and pro-Capitalist bias in wikipedia, I have no idea how to counter this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:AF||WP:CIVIL)

Comment: Nomination is completely without merit.  "Communist terror" turns up  18,700 google hits, "communist terrorism" turns up 6,980 google hits and "Maoist terrorism", just to use one possible additional term, turns up 1740 hits.  Of course search engine hits are just one indicator of notability.  In the U.S. State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, communist groups are only second to Islamic.  Plainly this subject is notable.  It has been used in the mainstream media,  see http://openweb.tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/1970-9/1970-09-01-CBS-23.html here and http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,837503,00.html?iid=chix-sp here, by http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-Singapor.html major encyclopedias, and in academic journals (http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0554%28197503%2969%3A1%3C306%3ATCATBC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O&size=LARGE&origin=JSTOR-enlargePage here, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-5850(195804)34%3A2%3C157%3AMNN%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y here and       http://www.clemson.edu/caah/history/facultypages/EdMoise/atroc.html here.   Anyone who's heard of the Red Brigade, Revolutionary Organization 17 November|November 17 or FARC know it's communist terrorism; this article is plainly proper.  It is not a POV fork but a separate notable subject.  It certainly makes as much sense as the eco-terrorism, narco-terrorism and bioterrorism articles.   This nomination is plainly a case of  on the nominator's part.  If there is POV in the article that can be fixed and is not a basis for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)