Deletion of John Fleming (2nd nomination)

Comment: Just for the record, I actually didn't create the entry myself. I am a tad disappointed that still no-one has said which "information... may not be reliable" I don't care about being deleted, but why on earth put notices on articles that unspecified information in an article may not be reliable in unspecified ways? I have repeatedly asked and never been told what information is said to be unreliable. I presume ( per , and  unless his claim to have co-written these books can be established) means The Times, Guardian, Stage and BBC are unreliable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN||WP:V)

Comment: per , and  unless his claim to have co-written these books can be established. Not many points for editorship, I'm afraid, seeing that he's only done 1 book which claims "bestseller status" (but has been independently reviewed) and 2 other very-mediocre-selling books. The book he claims to have co-written ranks http://www.amazon.co.uk/I-Stole-Freddie-Mercury-s-Birthday-Cake/dp/1857023854/ref=sr_11_1/026-4939628-4251652?ie=UTF8 446 thousandsths per Amazon.co.uk
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN||WP:V)