Deletion of Danielle Fong (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  and the following sources: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/new-energy-storage-technology-to-be-tested-in-nova-scotia-1.2721882, https://www.technologyreview.com/2015/12/22/164229/the-energy-startup-conundrum/, https://www.lepoint.fr/environnement/danielle-fong-meilleure-amie-des-energies-renouvelables-26-11-2013-1762109_1927.php (in French). I have picked three of the better ones, but there are plenty of sources out there to demonstrate meeting . It doesn't matter if Fong ever saves the world, media coverage exists of her attempts and her company's failure. If this discussion leans delete, it should instead be redirected to LightSail Energy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Notability, itself, is not temporary (see ) however the nominator has every right to bring it up for discussion and is not wrong to do so. The sources provided do still exist, as stated above. There are others when doing a  search, some of which are provided here, as is the case with the book. Ultimately, the current condition of the article, being a stub, is immaterial to the notability of the subject. AfD is not article cleanup nor should an article be deleted simply because it is incomplete in the eyes of the nominator. Likewise, the success, or lack thereof, of the subjects endeavors does not take away from said notability, once gained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:BEFORE)