Deletion of Natalia Poklonskaya (2nd nomination)

Comment: per nomination.  Closing admins should take note of the fact that this article is incompatible with  and the keep arguments boil down to , which isn't policy.  I note previous nomination was closed without taking this into consideration
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:HOTTIE)

Comment: Passes criteria #1 and #2 of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: The article meets the . Some editors may not like what the article entails, however you cannot deny that if people are actively looking for it on Wikipedia, it is therefore notable. http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Natalia_Poklonskaya This article has gotten 592,691 hits within the past 90 days (despite only existing for 65 days), which would suggest that this individual is just as notable than Jimmy Wales, whose article has http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Jimmy_Wales a meager 113,292 views for the same time period. Wikipedia is written for the ''readers'', and not a bunch of know-it-alls who write articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  #2c.  This was kept a month ago, and no basis has been identified for revisiting the question so rapidly
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:CSK)