Deletion of Time Cube (4th nomination)

Comment: Agree, this article is less about the website (which I don't see any evidence it meets  anyway) than about the theory itself.  The question here really is, it a theory that nearly every legitimate researcher and academic discounts to the point of virtually ignoring it notable as a theory?  How about as a meme if the theory has been roundly parodied and ridiculed?  No opinion yet, but if this was just about the website I would say the article is eminently more deletable per  than if it is considered as the theory being a meme
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: and redirect to Gene Ray. Even assuming ''arguendo'' that the crank theory as such is notable, the article does not conclusively indicate that the ''website'', which is the subject of the article, meets . We shouldn't keep it as an article on the theory, either, because the bulk of the article is an unsourced synthesis of the theory, meriting deletion per . What remains can be merged to Gene Ray, if deemed necessary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:NOR)

Comment: or fundamentally restructure with stronger documentation.  There are two cases which would justify an article on this topic under the guidelines.  First, the "theory" could meet verifiability (and other requirements) in and of itself.  There does not seem to be a strong sense that this is the case; the theory is known because of the author.  The argument for deletion or merger in that regard is the same that finally prevailed in the CTMU debacle.  Alternatively, an article could meet WP standards by being about the ''website'' itself, under the  requirements.  This article does not appear to meet those obligations: it is a long article focused on the content of the site (including a substantial list of claims that amounts to little more than contextless quotes).  The given references are directed towards the site's content and its creator, not towards the site in and of itself.  If there has been appropriate independant coverage of the site, cleanup and document accordingly.  If not, follow CTMU precendent and delete (or merge, if determined desirable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)