Deletion of Eddy Zemach

Comment: Appears to pass  #1 (heavily cited, as shown by GBooks, GScholar, and Questia searches) and #5
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Philosophy is a low-citation field making the citation counts difficult to evaluate but the pass of #C5 seems clear enough. I added some sources to the article (book reviews); http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=intitle%3A%22zemach+on%22 this Google scholar search finds several other articles by others directly about Zemach's work, so I think the case for #C1 can be made in this way without having to resort to bean counting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: GS h-index of 12 is high for philosophy and passes rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)