Deletion of Hypermuseum

Comment: I have encountered much difficulty trying to access the sources cited in the article, and in the sources I was able to gain access to, there was no mention of the concept of a hypermuseum. https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=TpcuDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT7&lpg=PT7&dq=%22The+role+of+hypermuseums+and+art+foundations%22&source=bl&ots=t30oyVBExq&sig=ACfU3U0-Vf88OU3lZGlltiwNmrwwDwjRng&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0kezah9DtAhXJdd4KHV8DAW0Q6AEwBHoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=hypermuseums&f=false This is the only source I could find which even mentioned the concept. Therefore, this article at best describes an obscure, coined research term which ought to be deleted per  and . As an alternative to deletion, it ''may'' be possible for some of the useful information in the article to be selectively merged to an appropriate title such as museum architecture. However, much of the information in the article is couched in the terms of a hypermuseum (which as mentioned falls within , and as such the passages probably need a fundamental rewrite before they could be usable. Unless someone is willing to perform the merge, or otherwise demonstrate widespread usage of the term in the academia / news, my delete vote stays
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:OR||WP:NEO)

Comment: appears to fail on  and  and has  issues
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:NEO||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per  and because this is an essay full of OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)