Deletion of Phoenix Electric Co., Ltd.

Comment: First, this was a publicly traded company, with its stock listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (http://www.kabu-toushi.com/investmentmuseum/kabuken/phoenixdenki.html--it was listed in the First Section, which is only for large corporations), the Japanese equivalent of the NYSE. It's no mom and pop company. As  says, "There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case. However, sufficient independent sources almost always exist for such companies, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above." In fact, it adds: "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not certain) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." That said, there is sufficient independent coverage out there to pass notability criteria: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/search?q=%E3%83%95%E3%82%A7%E3%83%8B%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%E9%9B%BB%E6%A9%9F&type=0&l=ja, http://jbpress.ismedia.jp/articles/-/42980, http://www.porterprize.org/pastwinner/2004/12/02173357.html, http://mikke.g-search.jp/QNBP_NB/2007/20070604/QNBP251927.html, http://kabutan.jp/news/marketnews/?b=n201501190268, http://jp.reuters.com/article/2008/09/26/idJPJAPAN-33955620080926, http://www.stockweather.co.jp/sw/news/2004/0705/ta110.html, etc. What makes it a bit harder to find articles is that the company has changed its name to Helios Techno Holding Co., Ltd., which has also taken over its slot on the TSE (number 6927). Thus more recent coverage tends to be about that company, not about Phoenix (http://www.nikkei.com/markets/company/index.aspx?scode=6927, https://kotobank.jp/word/%E3%83%98%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AA%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%82%AF%E3%83%8E%E3%83%9B%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB%E3%83%87%E3%82%A3%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0-1451938, http://jp.reuters.com/article/2015/05/11/idJP00093500_20150511_01720150511, http://jp.reuters.com/article/2010/05/14/idJPnJE140QTTQ20100514, http://www.msn.com/ja-jp/news/other/%E3%83%98%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AA%E3%82%B9-%E3%83%86%E3%82%AF%E3%83%8E-research-memo%EF%BC%882%EF%BC%89%E7%8F%BE%E5%9C%A8%E3%81%A7%E3%81%AF%E8%A3%BD%E9%80%A0%E8%A3%85%E7%BD%AE%E4%BA%8B%E6%A5%AD%E3%81%8C%E5%8F%8E%E7%9B%8A%E3%81%AE%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8A%E3%81%A4%E3%81%A4%E3%81%82%E3%82%8B/ar-AAcvqIA, etc.; in English: http://jbpress.ismedia.jp/articles/-/43235, http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=6927:JP, etc.). Phoenix now exists as a subsidiary and a brand name. Not only does the article need to be updated, but perhaps it might be best to change the name of the article. The Japanese Wikipedia has articles on both companies, but the Helios article (:ja:ヘリオス_テクノ_ホールディング), basically treats it as a continuation of Phoenix. Anyway, this easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTED||WP:CORP)