Deletion of Runelight

Comment: All the reviews look legit, published under a byline by major outlets.  Also, one of the removed sources, although a blog, is probably notable due to the Karl E. H. Seigfried|Norse Mythology expert who interviewed her.  Meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The tricky thing about reviews is that there's nothing that actually states that a one sentence review from a reliable source isn't really usable. There have been countless debates but in the end nothing official has ever really been stated one way or another. Do I necessarily think that every trade review is that in-depth of a source? No, but this is one of those grey areas of RS so until we get an official consensus and have it added to , there's not much to be done about it. Until that time comes, the sources in the article show notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK)