Deletion of Danielle Bleitrach

Comment: There are numerous notability guidelines. Cursory Google News search indicates  met to start in addition to . Don't badger
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The subject appears to fail , , .  I am not very convinced at the idea that someone can be a little bit of all of these things, and therefore pass some combination.  In any case, that seems to be a radical interpretation of policy.  I could easily be convinced with better secondary sources that she passes GNG, but those in the article do not.  The few independent secondary sources cited in the article do not rise to the level of "significant coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:NAUTHOR||WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: That she's a |Frenchie commie pinko doesn't matter. What matters is her books are well-read and held in many libraries. That is good for either WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)