Deletion of List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Vernon Philander

Comment: to Vernon Philander (removing details of the batsmen dismissed). No issues with inclusion in the main subject article, per  and , and would enhance the content there. International five-wicket hauls are a noteworthy achievement, and by definition, a list of them within the main article has the necessary context and explanation, so does not fail NOTSTATS in this regard. Unfortunately the nom seems to be misrepresenting the consensus of the cited RFC, which closed: {{tq|"There's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS||WP:SPLIT)

Comment: per /. {{tq|"To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources."}} This article is just a list of scores from ESPNCricinfo and has no independent sources covering these individual achievements as a set. Agree with nom that there should be no precedent to include these on players' articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS||WP:RAWDATA)

Comment: per . We're not Cricinfo, this kind of information is plainly well outside the scope of an encyclopedic coverage of the topic (i.e. per another section of WP:NOT, "not every match played or goal scored is worthy of mention" - same thing here, not every statistical mention/good performance needs mention, let alone a dedicated article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)