Deletion of T. T. A. Parasuram

Comment: The claimed political role is not an "inherently" notable one for the purposes of extending a presumption of notability under , but there's no evidence of enough |reliable source coverage to get him over . As for the arguments above about whether this is speedy deletable or not, note that "a claim of notability which is very clearly ''not'' |verified by the article's listed sources" ''is'' a valid reason to question whether the notability claim is ''credible'' or not — given that there's disagreement about the speediability, AFD is more appropriate than speedy in this instance, but simply asserting that people who consider it speediable are ''wrong'' is just wasting everybody's time and energy to no purpose, because there's a valid difference of opinion for valid reasons as to whether the notability claim is ''credible'' or not. So let's put a lid on that digression and just stick to discussing the article on its own clear lack of merit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:V)

Comment: per , and if not, '''Delete''' per nom
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:A7)