Deletion of Open Orthodoxy

Comment: Firstly, this article meets the standard criteria in terms of , , and sufficient material for a stand-alone article. Secondly, the nomination raises a red herring -- it says there is no evidence of the existence of a "movement". But the article describes it as a philosophy, not a movement. And philosophies are often associated with their founding philosophers, so long as the philosophies are themselves independently notable. As additional evidence of more widespread use in addition to the press coverage, see also e.g. http://www.ostt.org/pdfs/0607Brochure.pdf, http://www.hiwp.org, http://www.discoversydney.com.au/things/synagogue.html, http://www.bethjacobatlanta.org/?page_id=20. This has attracted enough attention and followers to be legitimately more than something specific to Avi Weiss and to be an approach a substantial number of individuals and congregations subscribe to
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)