Deletion of Run in Red (band)

Comment: I agree that the article fails  for the reasons stated by the nominator
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND)

Comment: This article should not be deleted because it meets 3 of the criteria for notability set out in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: There is an absolute dearth of reliable sources. This is wholly unsatisfactory from the perspective of passing either the most basic requirements of |general notability or the specific criteria at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NBAND)

Comment: The keep arguments are overlooking the key wording in WP:BAND: "musicians and ensembles may be notable..." "May" is different than "is." Coverage in sources need to stand up to scrutiny. There could be even more independent, reliable sources beyond the one or two here, but the coverage needs to be significant. As reiterated by nearly every other delete comment, this is all run-of-the-mill coverage and listings that are the due of any music act that makes the effort to promote themselves and get recognition. Most charitably, this is a case of . As it stands now--with one released Ep and evidence of regular performances-- this subject has no noteworthy accomplishment that would give it encyclopedic importance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per nom. Fails . No need for Moonchild101 to respond to my !vote, simply respect it without comment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBAND)

Comment: fails  and . So let's just stick to reviewing the sources listed in the article. Of the 20 sources, 13 are simply gig listings or links to streaming sites – the second part of criterion 1 of  says to exclude "works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates". So these 13 references can be discounted straight away. According to one editor who believes the article should be kept, the band fulfil criterion 11, "has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network", via their appearances on Pandora and Dublin South FM. But as there is no archive of these sites, we can't verify this, so they both fails , and in any case, we can't tell if they were actually in rotation (i.e. played more than once) or just received a single play. The article from the Irish Music Rights Organisation is a press release from the band's management/label, so it's not independent and also fails criterion 1 of . The ''Night Nomads'' and ''Into the Echo'' podcast are blogs and fail . ''The Sharpe'' also appears to fail  because there's no indication anywhere on its website about how professional its writers are or whether there is any editorial control: I can't find anything about the writer of the piece (and Zuzanna Piasek shouldn't be a difficult name to Google) or any of its other writers, bar one – Tahlia Peppard is a student from Zimbabwe in her final year at university, so she's definitely not a professional writer, and so you assume the others aren't either. That just leaves the one site from ''Joe'' the "keep" editors keep harping on about, but  requires multiple non-trivial sources, not just one. It's also been suggested that the band pass criterion 9 of , "has won first, second or third place in a major music competition" – firstly, the band are described as "finalists", no indication of a top three placing. Secondly, the Crystal Skull Sessions is far from being a major music competition – it's a standard "local talent contest" with no independent sources indicating its notability. Thirdly, it's disingenuous to link Sin-é in the article to the notable former New York City club of the same name which closed a decade ago – this Sin-é is a Dublin club. So, literally one reliable source in the whole article... it doesn't pass. It could be  as already mentioned, and maybe the band will be notable once their records start charting
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BAND||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:TOOSOON)