Deletion of DDR Freak (2nd nomination)

Comment: It has a substantial presence on the web, with over 60K Google hits http://www.google.com/search?q=ddrfreak.com&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official.  , and is a frequently-cited resource (as near as I can tell, the most commonly-cited fan resource for DDR information).  Seems to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Apparently does not meet , despite popularity, and does not provide sources as references or external links, as required by that guideline. For the article to stay, it must provide aforementioned sources. We could simply merge and redirect again, as stated by , but I think delete is better in this case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: Per AfD nomination, site does not have external claims to notability cited.  While site may have a large userbase, this does not necessarily establish |notability, and doesn't seem to meet those criteria.  While there is an external list of news articles http://www.ddrfreak.com/press.php here, some of these only mention it briefly, and the most recent articles don't even seem to mention the site at all.  It could be contested that some of these articles do show some notability (hence, the weak delete), but when many of the articles on that page are simply articles about DDR in general, I'm not so sure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)