Deletion of Hallam Road

Comment: Unsourced, but still notable in my view. The claim of "major arterial road" is backed up in https://www.heraldsun.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=HSWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.heraldsun.com.au%2Fleader%2Fsouth-east%2F535-hallam-rd-upgrade-to-be-completed-by-june%2Fnews-story%2Ffa953b64e5fcda8ec80485a8ad560d10&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&nk=d22bfdd5559bf7f4b732e15565ea7893-1627456899 this source (which I can't read bc it's subscriber only but the Google blurb states "one of Melbourne's busiest traffic corridors") confers  in my view. Sources that focus on the road exist, albeit a bit difficult to retrieve because you have to parse through news stories of stuff that happened on the road, but they do in fact exist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOROAD)

Comment: The article has been improved by {{U|Stalwart111}} I appreciate their effort, and I understand they feel the subject of the article is notable, I respect their opinion but disagree.  To me it still looks like is not notable, there is a grey area here, notability is not clear.  Per Wikipedia:Notability (highways) (''essay'') "It would be rare that a locally maintained road is notable, though not impossible." Per  the subject needs "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," The references on the article are mostly promotion "your government spending your money" kind of things.  The closest to meeting GNG is the reference https://www.victorianplaces.com.au/ which would be only one not several, and it is borderline in meeting if at all in my opinion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)