Deletion of LUNA Bar

Comment: with cautions.  I think it's just about got enough sources: Mountain Biking Magazine, Self (magazine), Fitness (magazine), San Francisco Business Times, and the NYT are fine if it's not just a passing mention, and Glamour magazine blogs are probably ok per  ("Some news outlets host interactive columns they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control.").  I'd suggest cutting out the obviously promotional or dubious and unreferenced bits, tagging with templates giving remaining concerns, and improving it generally
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The article is about a candy bar marketed with weight loss claims.  Sources verify that the product exist.  What celebrity endorsements and blurbs in women's magazines, no doubt orchestrated by their PR firm, don't establish is that the product has had any |significant effects on history, culture, or technology that elevate it above the |dozens of similar products to give this particular product lasting, encyclopedic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIN||WP:MILL)