Deletion of Kalpana (1960 film)

Comment: per meeting . For 50-year-old pre-internet Hindi films I urge the nominator to be a bit more creative in his |searches. It is often learned that even weak new stubs are not https://www.google.com/search?num=50&q=%22Kalpana+%281960+film%29%22+&oq=%22Kalpana+%281960+film%29%22+&gs_l=serp.12..0i22i30.98326.99327.0.100976.4.4.0.0.0.0.155.420.3j1.4.0.msedr...0...1c.1.64.serp..2.2.176.Uoq056bVtcU unsourcable, and that these films have become part of the enduring historic record for early Hindi cinema.https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Kalpana+(1960)%22&num=50&biw=1024&bih=655&tbm=bks&source=lnms&sa=X&ei=ZUsYVaioJoa1ogTuloCYCg&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&dpr=1  Like for instance, when a senior actor's or filmmaker's career is discussed, and media will include information about earlier significant works.https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Rakhan,+Kalpana%22&num=50&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=X0kYVfmDK8a2ogTAr4LYBA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAw&biw=1024&bih=655https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=%22Rakhan%2C+Kalpana%22&oq=%22Rakhan%2C+Kalpana%22&gs_l=serp.12...12889.14082.0.15698.5.5.0.0.0.0.103.365.3j1.4.0.msedr...0...1c.1.64.serp..4.1.99.5LD_XoP2g2Ehttps://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Ashok+Kumar%2C+Kalpana%22https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Padmini%2C+Kalpana%22  No, these old films will not have the coverage of some modern Western blockbuster... but they are suitable stubs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF||WP:BEFORE)