Deletion of ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

Comment: Mmm...y. Multiple, substantial sources, if you'd care to peruse the reference section
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Can any of the keep voters justify how this is not a violation of #NEWS ?  The article itself says "events passed by with little outward concern from the either the public at large or gaming journalists in particular."  The only outcomes of this incident, per the article, was that two publicity seeking individuals used it for their gain (and somebody wrote about it in their blog).  Just because an article is well written does not mean it should get a free pass if its in violation of policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Has multiple |reliable sources meaning it passes |notability and is |verifiable. Fail to see the problem really
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: Just because this is finely written should not be a reason to keep.   Delete per #NEWS, which says "something has been in the news for a brief period of time does not automatically justify an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)