Deletion of Atlas Strategic

Comment: Deletion standards are generally not subjective (i.e. just because someone thinks X is more/as notable as Y doesn't mean X should be kept). Reviewing , the only criteria it might pass is #5 (contains at least one notable member), but even that is borderline. Maybe merge/redirect to Dan Boeckner
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: If by prove, you mean that you are going to provide |reliable sources that |verify |notability, especially according to , then yes, you still need to provide them - in the article.  If you can do this, I will change my mind.  Read those links for guidelines on how to do this.  If, however, this is not the case, then no - in this latter case, my !vote, for one, will stand
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: because nobody has yet nominated it for deletion. Check  for instructions on how to do this (hint: scroll down until you see the instructions) - but make sure you review the reasons that an article should be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD)