Deletion of Child of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex

Comment: as  and potentially salt, although it's likely that an article will be warranted in the future. At the moment we have a pregnancy announcement and little else in terms of content; until the child is born, I don't think a standalone article is needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per , and salt; wait til the birth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: The baby is not even born and thus does not satisfy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per , and '''merge content into''' Meghan, Duchess of Sussex: as I understand it, under English law, an unborn fetus is not generally held to be a legal person until the moment of birth. As said above, the information in this article can be put into Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, whose pregnancy this is, until the child is born. At that point,  will apply, as usual
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:GNG)

Comment: wait for the birth as precedent Prince Louis of Cambridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (2nd nomination), & standard practice 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Royalwatchers may be disappointed but this is way , any significant and notable prebirth info, if any (sorry, but what maternity clothes she wears is not!:)), can be added to the Meghan, Duchess of Sussex|duchess article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)