Deletion of Islam and civil rights

Comment: Yes, the nominator is right, it serves to advance a position, and is a synthesis of published material that seeks to advance that position.  article, though  isn't a criterion for deletion. Also, I'm disturbed that the article uses Wikipedia, self-described as a tertiary source at , as a source, though this, too, is not a criterion for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP||WP:NPOV||WP:PSTS)

Comment: as |soapboxy |synthesis. Note the article should also be scrutinized for potential copyright violations: compare the Islam_and_civil_rights#Alcohol_In_Islam| Alcohol in Islam section and http://www.themodernreligion.com/misc/booze/alcohol_about.htm this essay. Another article created by the same supposed school project also had similar problems: See my comments at Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board#Hinduism_and_Science_-_A_School_Project| the Hinduism noticeboard
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAPBOX||WP:SYNT)