Deletion of Anuram

Comment: Notability is  (which makes the Nosebagbear's argument flawed). I don't see how he meets  as there is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources of the subject himself. Instead the article relies on Kalyanism and Dum for references, where he is either present as a passing mention or not at all. Nothing in my searches either. It is simply  at this point. He may easily become notable at some point, but not now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Director notability has always been a little unclear - it doesn't neatly fall into , but criterion 3 lines up with  criterion 1. In effect, any film that demonstrates its notability via multiple reviews also satisfies the requirements for director notability. Dum (2016 film) obviously meets this, as does the non-article film Kalyanism, using the references (https://www.nowrunning.com/movie/15938/malayalam/kalyanism/5018/review/ review 1 & https://www.indiaglitz.com/kalyanism-malayalam-movie-review-19116.html review 2). Either would technically be enough, and I believe between the two notability id demonstrated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR||WP:NFILM)

Comment: per nom and Clarityfiend. Fails . Also, IndiaGlitz and NowRunning are not RS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIRECTOR)