Deletion of HD 34137

Comment: There is no significance to this star. It is not notable at all and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: Not a notable star. Having actually looked at the so-called "significant coverage" in the purported ten SIMBAD sources I can confirm that none of them talk about it specifically, they just list it in large catalogues or as handy nearby photometric calibration objects in studies of something else entirely. This does not amount to significant coverage. This star seems to fail the relevant criteria in 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: non-notable per . I found one usage as a calibration star, but no substantial coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2011/04/aa15602-10.pdf This paper uses HD 34137 as one of six calibration stars.  They were selected from a catalog of calibration stars compiled in https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full/2005/15/aa1323/aa1323.html this work.  The total number of stars in this catalog is relatively small; 948.  That makes them more than run-of-the-mill but I don't know if that raises them to notable per WP:NASTRO.  Possibly  criterion #2 applies here, so perhaps I should say '''weak keep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTCRIT)