Deletion of Gerard Cornielje

Comment: None of the above keep !votes address the fact that he doesn't seem to meet the criteria for . However if you could provide references to articles about the person in newspapers, magazines, books or other reliable sources, then that could help establish his notability. This is all I could find (http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/metroplus/article1536521.ece article) and on its own it just isn't enough. In any case there is a lot of unsourced personal information in the article, which will need to be deleted unless sources can be found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSBIO)

Comment: Violates  ...please note a contributor states; ''"Agreed, I am a fan and therefore not objective..."'' and also the debate statement; "''Note - Above editor is apparently both the subject of the article and the sole author of it in its current form.''"  These statements in and of themselves should provide justification to Delete.  The article could then be rewritten for relevence and a neutral stance. And for what it matters, if you type in my name on a Google search you will get hits too, and anyone could drop my name on various lists on wiki as well as if that in and of itself is definitive of noteworthiness. Let us include you, don't just up and decide it yourself; that's what the world calls "narcissistic", a particularly unsavory tag to get listed as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Doesn't meet criteria for . Couldn't find any reliable secondary sources giving non-trivial coverage of the subject. No evidence of notability within the article. Lots of unsourced personal information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSBIO)