Deletion of Cerys Cooksammy-Parnell

Comment: List of children with tested IQ over NNN% or List of children recognized for extreme intelligence?). Essentially for me this breaches the spirit of  –specifically #INDISCRIMINATE and #NEWS. It also probably goes against BLP1E and protection of minors where there is doubt.  Essentially this article's existence asserts that "being a precociously bright child" without anything else, would make anyone inherently notable, since one must presume the same arguments could be made of any child of the same IQ, and only by chance is it this child and their childhood wishes for their future career which gained attention and not some other of similar mental prowess. By themselves, and lacking other evidence of anything, its just asserting that ''every'' child with IQ >XYZ is inherently notable if they get transient wide human interest coverage in the news, and I don't agree. (Similar reasons explain why a high profile crime witness who got lots of coverage because they were "the witness noticed by the news", is not normally considered notable however much coverage: see )). I'd rather see a redirect to a suitable list article, then those where it isn't |RECENTISM and isn't just transient attention, can be developed into full articles independently.  But so far there is no evidence this will not just be brief transient attention, like many events and topics in the news (#NEWS
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:NOT||WP:BLP1E||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOT)

Comment: or merge/redirect but no separate article. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)