Deletion of Eastern Alliance (2nd nomination)

Comment: GNG is met with sources already included in the article.  Failing that, a merge might be appropriate but  makes it perfectly clear that even if deemed non-notable, deletion is not an option when there is an appropriate merge target
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: per available sourcability and |allow expansion per http://books.google.com/books?id=HDcbAQAAIAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy, http://books.google.com/books?id=QWlZAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Eastern+Alliance%22,+Battlestar+Galactica&dq=%22Eastern+Alliance%22,+Battlestar+Galactica&ei=Ux08S6vBG4HClQSyoay9AQ&cd=5 Cinefantastique, Volume 35, Issues 1-6, http://books.google.com/books?id=wxAVWinvT8AC&q=%22Eastern+Alliance%22,+Battlestar+Galactica&dq=%22Eastern+Alliance%22,+Battlestar+Galactica&ei=Ux08S6vBG4HClQSyoay9AQ&cd=7 The encyclopedia of TV science fiction, http://www.sf-worlds.com/galactica/people.html Sf-Worlds, and others avaiilable online and in libraries. Sorry, but simply |saying something does "|not belong" is not a valid deletion rational
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL||WP:PPOV||WP:BELONG)

Comment: for lack of ''significant'' coverage.  Mentions of it's allegorical nature are not significant coverage.  I agree that it is not a major element of the work of fiction, and does not meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)