Deletion of Cinematism

Comment: For this definition, failed neologism and possibly fails as . There does seem to be some coverage for this term in Paul Virilio's understanding of the word; e.g., see page 5 http://books.google.com/books?id=SUFB8c4h5-oC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=%22cinematism%22&source=bl&ots=c_56Sq7hhP&sig=KFk0A-ZQEaXrtvZiFrLXkq7I_MI&hl=en&ei=26LQToDLM5KbtwflvfinDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CE0Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=%22cinematism%22&f=false here. See also http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=%22paul+virilio%22+%22cinematism%22&pbx=1&oq=%22paul+virilio%22+%22cinematism%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=10953l12844l2l13094l2l2l0l0l0l0l203l328l0.1.1l2l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=9c473f4daceb330e&biw=1680&bih=877 this Google Book search. However, as term under Virilio's understanding only really gets tossed around when Virilio's ideas are discussed, I think any WP coverage of it belongs within his article. Other uses of the word seem to be mostly various people's on-the-spot inventions, having various meanings related to the cinema
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per nom: |neologism. No reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)