Deletion of Battrick

Comment: it seems to meet similar criteria as another game Hattrick which was voted to be kept Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hattrick|here albeit this has a smaller userbase, but a community of 7000 would appear to give it a degree of notability. oint was cited in the previous example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Article has been nominated for deletion before and was found to have reliable sources, has over 100,000 Battrick related Google hits, the second biggest cricket game after Stick Cricket. I will also restate that Peephole has nominated a selection of browser based games in the last week for deletion and  has to apply, which I find quite hypocritical you saying is lame if you think Wikipedia guidlines are so important such as  and  which the article ''does'' pass with reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:WEB||WP:SOFTWARE)

Comment: 7,000 players is enough for borderline notability.  Onlien games are not the same thing as web sites, so  doesn't apply.  It needs to source this, though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: See 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Alexa Internet must not be used to support deletion of Wikipedia articles according to #Alexa_test|.   and  should not be applied in this case either under the #Wikipedia is not an experiment in rule making|spirit of the law.  The clear intention of  is to provide a barrier against websites which can be trivially created such as vanity pages.  Battrick and other browser-based games do not fall into the "trivially created" category, and  is merely a ''proposed'' guideline.  I'd also like to point out that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:SET||WP:WEB||WP:SOFTWARE||WP:NOT)