Deletion of NO$GBA

Comment: Also found http://www.emulator-zone.com/doc.php/gba/nocashgba.html.  (Emulator-zone.com is the top result on Google for "game emulators" so its not just some random blog.).  Faithlessthewonderboy, why do you think the link you provided doesn't establish |notability? —Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Per the reasons stated in the previous "Keep" comment.  No |sources within the article, and I cannot find any sufficient, reliable, third party sources externally, which makes it appear to be not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: For Software information and significant articles on emulation. Keep because Wikipedia per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: WP:IAR is not a valid defense. That said, the emulator has received coverage in reliable sources: http://kotaku.com/gaming/top/first-nintendo-ds-emulator-running-commercial-roms-released-194244.php First Nintendo DS Emulator Running Commercial ROMs Released!. The website, Kotaku, has editorial integrity, is ranked #1598 on Alexa, and is owned by company Gawker Media. The website and its owner both have Wikipedia articles themselves. This source is clearly reliable under . This would seem to imply that the emulator is notable, and so the article should be kept
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: Only emulator that can properly emulate commercial games, and due to the nature of the software there isn't likely to be much coverage in reliable sources. Although it somewhat contravenes existing policy I believe it contributes to Wikipedia per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)