Deletion of National Landing

Comment: I think there is lasting notability, given that (1) this is sufficiently covered that it meets WP:GNG and will receive enough future coverage to meet WP:SUSTAINED; (2) the National Landing article would give |an undue amount of weight to the Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia article if it were merged; (3) it is recognized by the respective governments of Arlington County, City of Alexandria, and Commonwealth of Virginia; and (4) National Landing was just announced, so of course there would be relatively few search results. If it turns out that National Landing is completely coterminous with something else, then sure, we can merge these articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:UNDUE)

Comment: Passes ... (Full disclosure, I am original author)... numerous independent sources have provided SIGNIFICANT coverage https://www.google.com/search?q=national+landing&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-SearchBox&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjp1qbartneAhUMt1MKHSszAtEQ_AUIDygC&biw=1670&bih=814 ~19,600,000 ghits , and public officials such as the https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/local/va-governor-welcomes-amazon-to-national-landing/2018/11/13/f85006dc-e77a-11e8-8449-1ff263609a31_video.html?utm_term=.c1f32e55e99a Governor of Virginia have recognized it as a "place." The fact that your search string includes "-Amazon" is what makes it lack any coverage. Yes, NL is newly announced in the last several days, and is closely associated with HQ2, BUT that doesn't make this , it just makes it a new geographic reference that encyclopedia readers will want to understand when it is referenced. Amazon HQ2 is not a PLACE, it is a corporate headquarters located in at least two places. National Landing is a place that will include Crystal City, VA, Potomac Yard, VA as well as other places
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: This place does not even exist yet , ALL descriptions of this place are in fact Crystal City, nobody even knew what this place was until the Amazon announcement (because it doesn’t exist), it was created ''for'' Amazon, there are no reliable sources to cover it outside of recent Amazon HQ2 reporting, and it will not be remotely notable until next decade at the earliest
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: into Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia without prejudice toward recreation if the name sticks. Quoting from : "New companies and future events might pass , but lack sufficient coverage to satisfy  ... If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, |we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." It seems clear that what we're talking about here is an entity that has only been covered in the context of a single event. Until the neighborhood is covered in a context not directly related to Amazon's announcement, I don't think it satisfies . Regarding what to do for a redirect, I think it should go to Crystal City because people who search for it on Wikipedia are going to be looking for an a description of the neighborhood, and even though National Landing doesn't exactly correspond to Crystal City, it's the closest match among entities that have articles. Some of the information can be merged, so long as it doesn't violate 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER||WP:UNDUEWEIGHT)

Comment: Ample coverage of the subject to meet . Whether locals use the name is irrelevant, what matters is what reliable sources do. Heck, we don't even call Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport|the airport by its name. And while I'm being somewhat flippant, that's actually a pretty good example - most reliable sources call it Reagan, or Reagan National, but not just National, so that's what we do. Plus nobody has offered one iota of evidence that this name is even the slightest bit controversial among locals
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: There are dozens (hundreds? thousands?) of reliable sources discussing this place/place name. I think this becomes especially clear in light of {{u|Eperoton}}'s well-considered edit from "planned suburb" to just "area" -- and there may be other ways to frame it that could be better still. Per local authorities, it is not "just Crystal City" but rather a wider area that, the authorities say, should be considered under one umbrella. Yes, the name first became public because of the HQ2 project, but that's why you can't run a Google search for it, exclude the word Amazon, and conclude there aren't any reliable sources left. Of course any mention of the area is going to mention Amazon! Even if the name sticks and starts dotting highway signs and postcards in five years, 99% of the reliable sources about it are still going to mention Amazon because HQ2 is going to be a huge part of the identity of the area going forward. And conversely, as long as Amazon and the local governments and commercial interests are using "National Landing" to refer to the neighborhoods around HQ2, the name will have some currency and notability through sustained coverage of that development as it grows. The name may or may not "happen" long term, but in the near to mid term, the name and the concept of the overall area are notable and amply documented. Readers will continue to seek information about this place that continues to be mentioned in news articles, and rather than surprise readers with a redirect to Crystal City (which is also factually incorrect) or a generic "Neighborhoods of ___" article, Wikipedia should bring them to an updated, well-sourced article about the place they want to know about. As a result, I agree with {{u|MPS}} that the best course is to keep the page, maintain it as things develop, and if it turns out that the name ultimately does not stick, it can then perhaps be moved under a neighborhood list subject to the caveats above. I believe the |"not temporary" guidelines support and even require this: "Notability is not temporary; ''once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage''," but notability may be reassessed from time to time in future AfD discussions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTEMP)