Deletion of Advancing Science Worldwide

Comment: Some of the examples given on  as what constitutes substantial coverage are "An encyclopedia entry giving an overview of the history of an organization" or "A report by a consumer watchdog organizations on the safety of a specific product". The GuideStar articles, Fiscal Sponsor Directory article, VolunteerMatch article, and some others are more similar to this than the "simple listings or compilations" that  describes as trivial coverage. Many sources tell a good history of the organization like an encyclopedia and the GuideStar article incorporates elements of both examples. Some of the sources are closer to the trivial coverage but several of the sources do qualify as substantial coverage given the examples in . That is why I think that the article satisfies the notability guidelines in 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:ORG)

Comment: Does not meet  or . Sources are primary or otherwise not significant in-depth coverage
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NORG)