Deletion of Dwolla

Comment: Meets  per coverage in bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, reliable sources. Source examples include http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/01/20/dwolla-founder-ben-milne/1849469/ USA Today, http://fortune.com/2015/04/08/dwolla-bbva-compass-real-time-transfers/ Fortune, http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/using-dwolla-to-send-and-receive-money/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=1 The New York Times, https://books.google.com/books?id=Ad1OAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA132 ''Globalization and Money'', https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Dwolla%22&tbm=nws etc., https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Dwolla%22 etc. Promotional tone can be addressed by |copy editing the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:COPYEDIT)

Comment: strictly promotional and has been tagged as such since 2014. Wikipedia is not a platform for companies' promotional messaged. The ''Fortune'' article referenced above does not meet , including copy such as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: This one I scratch my head on as the nominator says there is detailed talk page discussions. If you look, there are references laid out there by other parties. My search found more references than I could possibly use for the page. Here is one from http://fortune.com/2015/04/08/dwolla-bbva-compass-real-time-transfers/ Fortune that is about as in-depth as you can get to satisfy . As far as promotional tone or COI, it can be cleaned up without deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: No one has addressed the obvious  issues so I must assume SwisterTwister is correct
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:LINKSPAM)

Comment: The company does have coverage per  and is similar to other corporate pages we allow
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Fortune'', ''Forbes'', and ''TechCrunch'' certainly count as , and all have significant articles.  If the linkspam is an issue, just remove it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: advertising. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)