Deletion of List of lineal boxing world champions

Comment: This article says it's about the CBZ defined lineal champions and there's a lack of independent reliable sources to show it's notable enough to pass . I'm not sure BoxingScene is a reliable source, but even if it is that means the article has one qualifying source.  The Lineal championship article mentions various lists and I think that's sufficient
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per core WP policy and the general edit-warring mess of the article since its inception. Having a plethora of so-called reputable sources each with their own interpretation of lineal succession fails , , and whatever other policies there are regarding consensus of sources—as in, are sources unified in the content of the article? The answer is a resounding ''no''. Since there is no consensus amongst boxing historians and their publications, WP should categorically not be perpetuating such confusion further
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: First, WP's goal is to report what others document as notable, not to be the "goto place" to settle arguments between sources.  I would also dispute that there's enough significant, independent coverage to show  is met.  You have 4 articles by Jake Donovan, which WP would recognize as 1 source and all of the other sources are from organizations with vested interests in the topic.  I'm not seeing anything that would make me think the AfD on CBZ lineal champions was incorrect or has been superseded by a better article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)