Deletion of Nature's Fynd

Comment: This article seems to pass  or at least is a good example of a  (if BASIC can be applied to non bio articles).  There is a lot of encyclopedic content from places that are  (Wired, UPI, Several federal agencies) on top of the Series B publicity which is actually surprisingly detailed with editorial contributions rather than rehashings of a press release
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC||WP:RS)

Comment: The existence of sources like https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-natures-fynd-sustainable-bioproducts-alternative-protein-20200317-jbtanzoqljgwxlfvdhmldxgpwi-story.html https://www.americaninno.com/chicago/funding-chicago/bill-gates-backs-33m-round-for-chicago-startup-developing-lab-grown-protein/ and https://www.nosh.com/news/2020/fermented-protein-supplier-erupts-as-a-cpg-company convinces me that this passes . It is silly and plain incorrect to apply  to companies, that policy is clearly for people
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:ONEEVENT)