Deletion of Saeed Chmagh

Comment: per Jujutacular. Though to be fair, we shouldn't discount '''keep''' votes above if they reflect ''If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate.'' (from ). I don't happen to believe that applies here, but I accept that others may differ. So should the closer
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: The event is only borderline notable (civilians often get killed by accident in warzones, its terrible but it happens).  But this individual is '''only''' notable because he was killed in this event.  He was not notable as a journalist, and his tragic demise is the definition of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEVENT)

Comment: to July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike per  for now. That notability guideline states: "as both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles become justified". I don't think Chmagh has reached that point. Given some time maybe he will, but at this point it's too early to have a separate article about him
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: The event is notable enhough to fulfill the exception clauses is 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: to July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike per . Not notable outside of being an unfortunate victim of "wrong place, wrong time." when a U.S. helicopter fired at what were thought to be armed insurgents. No evidence they assassinated him because they wanted Saeed Chmagh, in particular, dead. His work did not apparently lead to his death, other than perhaps in having a camera with a long lens mistaken for a weapon, and standing around with men, who some of whom appeared to carry AK-47s
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I think it's been sufficiently expanded to be focused more as a biography now, not a stub recounting their role in the airstrike. It could still use some expansion, but now I feel it's not in violation of  because it is focused on both Chmagh's career ''and'' the airstrike
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)