Deletion of Theocracy (band)

Comment: as mentioned at , , and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, there should be multiple sources on the band itself (ie, not an album or specific show, but on the band itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: this does appear to meet  now with the addition of reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: WP:N|notability is established by non-trivial coverage in multiple |reliable sources which are not affiliated with the article's subject. Sometimes being popular indicates that such sources are likely to exist-if they do, for example, if you know of a magazine or newspaper that covered the band-please cite them, and I'll happily change my mind! "Notable" does ''not'' mean "popular", "well-known", or "successful"-though all those things can make establishment of notability more ''likely
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: It looks like that magazine is reliable, so I'm going to change to a keep. I can certainly help you cite that as a source if that's a problem, or see 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: Just because they played at a major festival doesn't make them notable right away, just like every band that plays Ozzfest, Austin City Limits, Bonnaroo, South by Southwest, ect. shouldn't have it's own page based solely on that. You say "They're a really new band, and they're rising quickly in the world of Progressive metal" and that is a factor. |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; one cover story in this genre is little to go on, as per precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes. The band is welcome to have a page once they become more notable in their scene with multiple, non-trivial reliable sources, but as it stands now, they are still in the process of getting there. I have no problem with the group having a page like you say once they grow more popular. As for the other bands that are included on Wikipedia, |plenty of articles exist that probably shouldn't
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)