Deletion of Raven (book)

Comment: An entry about a book shouldn't soapbox nor reference itself per |reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Easily satisfies . The article at present unfortunately does not contain a reception section, but the book has most certainly ''received significant coverage in Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources|secondary sources that are Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent of the subject'', per . I was quite quickly able to find reviews and significant discussion in / secondary sources including: ''CHOICE: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries'', ''The New York Times Book Review'', ''Los Angeles Times'', ''San Francisco Review of Books'', ''Library Journal'', ''Psychology Today'', ''Publishers Weekly'', ''Kirkus Reviews'', and ''National Review'', among many others. I will work on expanding this article and perhaps getting it up to  status, but I probably won't be able to get to it for a few days
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NOTE||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:GA)