Deletion of GOOOH National Committee

Comment: this article should GOOOH away (like I wasn't the first to think of this?). In all seriousness, article is grossly written from a POV, also the group does not meet  and there aren't any other verifications
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: per  and , although I find the acronym pretty amusing.  It's like something an anime character would shout while charging into battle
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:N)

Comment: I see no grounds to delete based on , please clarify as this assertion appears groundless based on 1) multiple newspaper articles from mid-sized metropolitan areas (as shown here http://www.sanmarcosrecord.com/features/local_story_358094357.html, here http://trailblazers.beloblog.com/archives/2008/01/covered_in_goooh.html, and here http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080128/NEWS01/488109150/-1/XML07), 2) dozens of blog and website references (incl. one as notable as Richard Winger http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/09/27/goooh-endorses-ron-paul-ballot-access-bill), and 3) a published book on the process found on Amazon.com http://www.amazon.com/Get-Out-Our-House-Representatives/dp/1934454036/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203897529&sr=8-1 and BarnesAndNoble.com http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&EAN=9781934454039&itm=1.  Regarding the article having a POV: that is possible, but warrants a cleanup - not a deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)