Deletion of Donald Roden

Comment: per nom, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: If this were a starting faculty member with a record like this I'd be more impressed, but if the best we can dig up after 30 years is a single book with three reviews and 21 cites in Google scholar, an associate professorship, and mention in a list of a couple dozen faculty who've been at Rutgers for 30 years, it doesn't seem like a pass of  to me. #1, #2, #4: where are the citation numbers or other evidence that he is regarded as a significant expert or an important figure, or that his collected body of work is regarded as significant? #3: three reviews (actually at least four: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/446359) does not qualify a humanities book as a significant work, it is rather the minimum that one would hope for. And it's his Ph.D. thesis; what has he done since? #5: what distinguishes his work from that of other East Asian historians? #6: time-at-service is simply not a ''notable'' award. I'm aware that Google scholar may not be the best source for citations to this kind of work, but the other database I tried, ISI, gave even fewer results: searching for Roden, DT, only three papers came up, two completely uncited and one with only two citations
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I don't think the 30 years service is anything that can be used to pass notability. On the contrary, being there that long and yet not being promoted to full professor seems a bad sign for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)