Deletion of Lisa Firestone

Comment: No independent sources to support }}. GS cites not yet adequate for rof. Too soon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:P)

Comment: I think she passes #C7. Even filtering out any mentions of her Huffington Post column, GNews still giveshttps://www.google.com/search?q=%22Lisa+Firestone%22&tbm=nws#safe=off&tbm=nws&q=%22Lisa+Firestone%22+-Huffington 410 hits. Some are false positives, but most appear to be mainstream media sources quoting her opinions as an academic experts on psychology and psychotherapy. A number of independent from her sources have profile pages for her, including one at Dr Phil, http://www.drphil.com/therapist/lisa-firestone/, as well as more detailed ones, like here http://www.drphil.com/therapist/lisa-firestone/. I think this is the kind of a situation that #C7 was meant for. Also, she co-wrote several reasonably successful books, whose mention the nominator somewhat overzealously https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lisa_Firestone&type=revision&diff=727870470&oldid=717723352 removed from the article (There is no problem with including a selected bibliography - this practice is completely standard for WP articles about authors and academics). I haven't checked what's what there, but GBooks search for her name does give 1180 hits
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)