Deletion of June 2017 Champs-Élysées car ramming attack

Comment: per , there is already a mention of this incident at Champs-Élysées. The killer will get no trial, where is the lasting impact
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: I am legitimately ashamed of a lot of editors here. One day of coverage that mirrors itself is considered "extensive"? Not one keep rationale has explained the long-term  impact of this subject. In fact, the majority of you blatantly ignore it. As soon as the words "terrorist attack" pop up in a wave of brief or  media coverage, you just vote keep without actually analyzing the written policies that outline why these articles are not notable. Sheeple|Like a bunch of sheep
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: It is clearly . It got a lot of media attention in international and national media. It got a lot of responses in France, especially in politics. And it was a planned terrorist attack, which normally get coverage here if it gets covered by mass media. I would love to know what is different to this article than to any other bomb plot or terrorist incident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I am legitimately offended when an editor attempts to shame other editors for how they vote.  The last sentence of  states "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable."  Unless you have a crystal ball that this event that has received sufficient international RS will have no long lasting effect, an apology is in order
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LASTING)