Deletion of Recycle Track Systems (2nd nomination)

Comment: as (repeated) unambiguous , aggravated by apparent disregard for previous community consensus
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: Despite the blizzard of references, I don't see anything that makes this meet .   applies.  If I had run across this on my own, I might have deleted it under .  List of customers, lists of dubious awards, lists of things they've done to make an impact?  That's not an encyclopedia article, that's a PR piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:THREE||WP:G11)

Comment: The deletion nomination is predicated on 'advertorial tone' and 'lack of reliable sources'.  The first is an editing issue; the second is false.  There also seems to be a presumption that something deleted via AfD should stay deleted.  There are remedies for this: , Wikipedia:Recreation_of_previously_deleted_pages#Speedy_deletion|Speedy deletion, blocking of authors ... though these are pretty heavy hammers and don't seem appropriate in this case. --User:Ceyockey
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: also a quick Google search reveals Forbes and CNBC wrote about them https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2018/02/07/recycle-track-systems-wants-to-be-the-next-uber-for-garbage/ https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/05/uber-for-trash-uses-ride-share-technology-for-food-waste.html so I don't think it is just a standard case of self-promotion, passes  for me
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)