Deletion of Scarus zufar

Comment: per  and . Article meets core guidelines for verifiability, sourcing, etc. and thus keeping it serves Wikipedia better than deleting it. The creator has been blocked after their self-reporting. (Note for transparency:  the nom has tagged the article previously for speedy deletion (G6, U2 and then G5), and each was declined by an admin -- the last time by me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR||WP:COMMONSENSE)

Comment: per CactusWriter and . Deleting an article created by a banned or blocked editor and then improved by others makes no sense. Keeping it is not an endorsement of the sockpuppet's activity
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES)