Deletion of Poe's law (2nd nomination)

Comment: no reliable sources (blogs generally don't qualify under WP:RS). One can also say it's a |neologism
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: ostensibly not a "vanity" page, since it has been created by me, and I have no connection whatsoever with Mr. Poe.  should be judged based on the references given based on precedents for adages of online-culture such as Godwin's law, Hofstadter's law, Hutber's law, Ševčenko's law, Wirth's law and other "laws" you may never have heard of. The deletion in 2005 was due to practically no google hits (48). In the meantime, this number has increased by a factor of http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Poe%27s+law%22&btnG=Google+Search >100, and the adage is listed in the Urban Dictionary (which I grant you is not the OED
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)