Deletion of Streisand effect (3rd nomination)

Comment: Forbes and the ''Globe and Mail'' are good enough |reliable sources for me; there were literally more sources in my search that appeared reliable than I had time to investigate.  I have personally seen this phrase used in a number of different contexts, some reliable sources, some not, but sufficient to convince me that it's passed into public parlance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: 34 references and deletion is asked? Nonsense. It's one of the most notable expressions ever. The page has issues? |Edit, don't delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: It is not true that there is no evidence that people use the term. Egregious  failure as a simple search would have brought up reliably published books and news sources that use the term, explain its origin, and apply it to other cases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)