Deletion of Victoria Taylor

Comment: to Reddit#Controversies involving reddit, as the vast majority of the reliable, non-trivial (i.e. not one sentence with "reddit spokesperson Victoria Taylor said this") sources are about the recent incident, thus making her fall under 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Another week, another Reddit ''Sheisssturm'';  was made for this. For the same reason, I oppose the redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: into the reddit controversies section if it exists. Also, Im sure there has been |stealth canvassing going on at reddit, because they sure enjoy discussing these talk pages as they did http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/3c6ajx/reddit_ceo_ellen_pao_the_vast_majority_of_reddit/cssth0w here. It's a cause for concern because such an extensive website can influence the outcome of this poll
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:STEALTH)

Comment: to the incident list on Reddit per  (even if strictly not 100% applicable here). While there are some sources discussing her before this incident, not enough to pass . Because of this, merging for now seems the best option - the article can always be recreated later if/when new sources emerge about her and not Reddit
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:GNG)

Comment: to Reddit#Controversies involving reddit. I'm a redditor, and as much as I'd like to see her become positively notable enough for an article she's not there yet. She's certainly notable enough to be mentioned in the Riddit article, but  applies here. The Google appearances of her name before the controversy that I find all mention her as the spokesperson forwarding them information and nothing more.  --&#124
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: or merge and redirect. This article is borderline BLP1E, but the reason why I veer towards keep is the content is worth keeping and it would be both awkward and impossible to keep it all in the Reddit article, so |let's use our common sense here. I have no dog in this fight - although I'm a reddit moderator I regarded the whole imbroglio with amused aloofness
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: or '''Merge and redirect''': The content is notable and has many sources, but this may be a case of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I think  applies here. &mdash;&nbsp;regards
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: To Reddit, as per everyone else. There simply isn't enough material here to create a bio based on  or 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BASIC)