Deletion of North American Man/Boy Love Association

Comment: One look at the references at the end of the article is enough to establish otability, before we even start to talk about the 1300 Google News hits. The article does need monitoring for POV of course, but the same is true of any article on a controversial subject - it's not a reason for deletion. If you dislike the subject matter, remember OTCENSORED|Wikipedia is not censored. Is it ing yet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NOTCENSORED||WP:SNOW)

Comment: The organization itself is the subject of coverage by numerous third-party sources http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=NAMBLA&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=us therefore it meets . Any of the other concerns amount to censorship. It is of zero concern to Wikipedia itself what this organization exists to do. If you are concerned about the content of the page, the solution is on the talk page, not AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Clearly notable by the definition at  due to the volume of links to coverage about the organisation.   isn't a grounds for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)