Deletion of Jay and Seth vs. The Apocalypse (2nd nomination)

Comment: Still mulling this one over. On the one hand, it has received some coverage. But, as  says, "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability." I'm not sure that this has passed the threshold required. It's also worth noting that of those references and external links that aren't from sources of borderline reliability (not in a real world sense, but a Wikiworld one), they're pretty much just reporting the intention to make the feature film, with a brief note that it was "based upon an internet trailer that went viral last year
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Before I decide which way to fall on this one, I will say that I don't think this should be treated purely as a film article in this debate.  is probably less relevant than the |general notability guideline, and it's this it should probably be judged against, as an article about any other popular Youtube video might be. With that in mind, can anyone cite precedent one way or the other here? Do we have any articles on other Youtube clips that have had a large number of hits and have subsequently received some minor press coverage
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:N)

Comment: I think Steve explained it well. Have 20 sources mention the trailer in a single line does not constitute the "significant coverage" required by the |notability guideline. Yes, the trailer was such a hit with fans that it inspired them to go ahead with the movie, no one is doubting that, but no one is really reporting on the trailer itself...they are reporting on the film. You cannot extrapolate notability on the trailer from article's that focus on the film. That's like saying if a minor character is briefly mentioned in 20 film reviews (e.g. Minor character X was played by famed actor Brad Pitt, in the film Y..blah blah blah), then we should have an article on the minor character that is mentioned 20 times in one line statements. The last half of the page is devoted to....|a future film. This is really something that should be on Rogen, Goldberg and Stone's personal pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE||WP:NFF)