Deletion of Audrey Dwyer

Comment: In my opinion, WP:NACTOR is the wrong criteria to look at Dwyer under. She is more notable for her writing and for her work as a theatre practicioner (associate artistic directorships, artistic director, directing). Therefore I suggest . I'll specifically point to crit. 3 for creating ''Calpurnia'', which has multpile independant reviews, and writing ''The D Cut''. Here are 3 Calpurnia reviews (because multiple means 2 or more) as proof: {{URL|https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/theatre-and-performance/theatre-reviews/review-calpurnias-inconsistent-characters-undermine-a-play-with-promise/article37662663/|Globe and Mail}}, {{URL|https://nowtoronto.com/culture/theatre/calpurnia-audrey-dwyer-to-kill-a-mockingbird|NOW Toronto}}, and {{URL|https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/stage/review/2018/01/22/racial-drama-calpurnia-is-smart-and-important-but-imperfect.html|Toronto Star}}. In terms of meeting GNG, at the very least there's this {{URL|https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/entertainment/arts/royal-mtc-names-new-associate-ad-507076772.html|Winnipeg Free Press article}}. I know list-based articles don't always count in terms of sigcov, but CBC named her {{URL|https://www.cbc.ca/arts/31-black-canadian-female-playwrights-you-need-to-know-1.5487368|one of "31 Black Canadian female playwrights you need to know"}}. In my opinion, she pretty easily meets an SNG (), so I think it's a keeper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: u|Samsmachado}}, first off thanks for creating the article. Now, let’s get to analysis @{{URL|https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/theatre-and-performance/theatre-reviews/review-calpurnias-inconsistent-characters-undermine-a-play-with-promise/article37662663/|Globe and Mail}} required me to login before reading.  The  {{URL|https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/arts-and-life/entertainment/arts/royal-mtc-names-new-associate-ad-507076772.html|Winnipeg Free Press article}} appears to be a legit reliable one which actually does justice to subject of your article but I am afraid one source isn’t good enough for . The {{URL|https://www.cbc.ca/arts/31-black-canadian-female-playwrights-you-need-to-know-1.5487368|31-black canadian female playwrights you need to know}} is a list article & list articles do next to nothing in satisfying  as they are mere listings that don’t discuss their subjects(names listed) with |significant coverage. Overall you have just one decent source discussing subject of your article. In your defense you have pointed to three reviews of their work & claimed they satisfy no 3 of ''creative'', Now if 3 reviews of a subject’s work supersedes  is why I have opened this AFD, so the community can decide this for themselves. My job here is done I won’t be badgering you or anyone as this is indeed one of those cases in which I’m curious to see the outcome. I should also state that SNG’s are not necessarily >  especially in a scenario as this where only 1 out 4 criterion’s are barely met
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)