Deletion of Ferdinand Feichtner (2nd nomination)

Comment: The nom has, with an unusual degree of precision, identified that this article clearly does not meet . So, we're left with . The article is incredibly detailed, as one might expect in an autobiography, but that really doesn't meet the criteria for significant and reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Many soldiers have had interesting experiences but we have notability requirements because not every one deserves an encyclopedia article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom.  is not a criteria for keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:VALINFO)

Comment: even after its recent filleting (a sub-headeroctomy!), what remains is far too reliant on primary sources. A  search suggests that this is due too there being a dearth of available independent, secondary sources.{{pb}}Put it another way— three article makes use of all available sourcing on the topic, and ''still'' fails to pass the most basic requirements of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:ANYBIO)