Deletion of São Tomé and Príncipe – United States relations

Comment: with the recent large number of bilateral relations articles being deleted, this is all starting to seem a bit like arguing a |POINT. However on top of that a search on the subject revels that we have multiple sources to justify an article. Such as, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,92059,00.html A Fox news article, http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1058352552257_17/?hub=World a CTV article, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030716.wsaotome0716/BNStory/International/ and a Globe and Mail article all of those details the United states response and diplomatic options with the country following a coup. The United States acknowledges relations on a http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/5434.htm#relations state department website calling relations between the two, "excellent". Here are some more recent articles, such as http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=19326 one detailing post coup relations and an article showing the United States Coast Guard training soldiers in São Tomé found at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8862171 a trusted news website. And there is yet more articles detailing treaties and pacts such as http://allafrica.com/stories/200711100142.html this one or another detailing http://allafrica.com/stories/200408231407.html military ties. Need I go on because I could do this for hours with all the sources available
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: It's not  at all.  Many of these bilateral articles were created by one... "hihgly motivated" editor, and probably should never have been created in the first place.  We are just sorting through the mess at this point
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)