Deletion of Progressive Youth of Poland

Comment: First: I favor the lowest of all possible bars for inclusion of political parties and their youth sections. There are lots of things to slice from an encyclopedia based upon "notability" concerns, but coverage of political organizations — left, right, and center ideologically — should not be one of them. Second: Poland being a former Communist country, the new communist political organizations emerging in their aftermath are likely to be of academic interest. Even if this were nothing more than a stub article that ''Progressive Youth of Poland is an independent communist political organization based in XXX, with an estimated XXX members. It is an affiliate of the World Federation of Democratic Youth,'' that would be important, valid, worthwhile encyclopedic content. There comes a time to put aside notability doctrine and to  (Use Common Sense). Third: The fact that this group claims adherence to the WFDY (the equivalent of the old Communist International of Youth in the cold war period) is an ''indicator'' that this may well be a significant group, as opposed to a microscopic sect. I don't know, I'm not an expert on current politics in Eastern Europe, but this should be regarded as a "yellow flag" that deletion should not be rushed here. I see no pressing reason why this page should be deleted. I favored redirection of Communist Youth of Poland to this article in an AfD yesterday. This one should be kept, in my opinion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Ignore all rules (WP:IAR)

Comment: I can't find anything in searches to satisfy ,  or . I even looked up "Postępowa Młodzież Polski" and saw about 39k hits but with a lot of organizational listings and MySpace. The engine split up the words in a Google News search although I put them in quotes. This may have happened in the basic search as well. If the group is a World Federation of Democratic Youth member, it can be listed World_Federation_of_Democratic_Youth#Europe_.26_North_America|here. I understand the philosophy argument given above about notability but I think we need to stick to the core WP policies in this case. Not every political group or organization rates a standalone article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:ORG)

Comment: I have a lot of sympathy for Carrite's position that articles about political entities, of any significance at all, should be given all the leeway possible to allow them to remain in the encyclopedia.  I'd also note that  is a guideline, not a policy. On the other hand  ''is'' a policy, and we do need to find ''some'' sort of reasonable verification that this organization really exists and is what the article says it is.  Digging into the organization's website, I noted a rather interesting entry, on the organization's FAQ pagehttp://www.kmp1917.pl/faq.php?cat_id=1, which begins, in unreliable Google translationhttp://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=pl&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kmp1917.pl%2Fnews.php&act=url, as follows
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)