Deletion of Tarikh Ahlul Hadith

Comment: I'm inclined to suggest delete per  (article cites itself?!). However, some sources do seem to be provided ... but I honestly can't follow what this article is claiming and how these sources seem to apply. Though sources are cited, I can't make heads or tails out of them (or the article) enough to verify anything. This may be a notable topic in Islamic tradition. However the article, as written, requires a massive cleanup. I would not oppose the article being deleted so something new (and more clearly |verifiably |sourced) could replace it. Ideally someone familiar with the subject would be willing to clean up/wikify this, confirm its sources, and eliminate  (though honestly I'm not sure I understand the article enough to say if it's even NPOV or not -- parts of it seem to skirt the boundary). Otherwise, I'm afraid a delete might be the best option
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:NPOV)