Deletion of New Cold War

Comment: Per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NEO)

Comment: Neologism.  And it's been used in multiple other instances, such as to describe the rise of http://books.google.com/books?id=8oiQuGN6-vcC&dq=%22new+cold+war%22+juergensmeyer&pg=PP1&ots=lozFsk9qxm&sig=FsBszchflw6AwLJ5uPlpxDGBWNY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result religious nationalism.  A wikipedia article about the phrase "new cold war" would have to include multiple instances of its usage, not just the one described here.  Besides, this is mostly a  violation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: This is (as, to its credit, the article says) "term used to describe the perceived..." etc. It belongs on Wiktionary, not here, until  it either acquires an actual (non-) subject, or at a minimum a recognized movement distinct from neoconservatism. The only substance here is two books with this title, heirs to a long-standing tradition of political prophecy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per  and ; discovered AfD via ANI
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Please give historians a chance ... it's only been a week since the Ossetian crisis! Anyways, this article seems just like another excuse for wannabe political scientists to go on a massive  violation spree
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: Neologism is not well enough established.  Someday, we may all agree that there is a new cold war, but that is by no means certain yet.  Delete per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NEO)

Comment: Per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NEO)

Comment: per oatrack,  and RYSTAL. Meaningful text can be merged into Edward Lucas (journalist) and Georgian-Ossetian_conflict articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C||WP:NEO||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per  there are good chanses that the curent crysises with the name will be forgotten in a couple of years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)