Deletion of Pokémon types (3rd nomination)

Comment: not an appropriate article per . Asserts no notability via non-trivial coverage by |reliable sources independent of the topic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:VGSCOPE||WP:RS)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a game guide, which is what a considerable amount of information in this article is.  While this could (and probably was, in the last few AfD's) be considered purely an editorial issue, I don't think it can be in this case.  Or at least, it shouldn't be.  Approximately 80% of the article content is information on how to better play the handheld or card game.  No |reliable, |published sources independent from the game manufacturer are cited, meaning this article does not meet .  Game manuals don't count.  Self published websites don't count.  Pokemon wikis don't count.  Also (as a purely editorial manner), some OR has cropped up in the current version, I'll see if I can't get rid of it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SPS||WP:GNG)