Deletion of Reiner Grundmann

Comment: He writes papers and stuff, which is what all academics do. I don't see that he passes even the extremely low bar of , much less real-world notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: In my opinion he doesn't pass . And I doubt that the presentation is neutral, especially since the main author seems to use him to support his clear agenda to raise doubt in a lot of quite settled scientific fields, especially climate change. Just look at Naomi Oreskes: With Merchants of Doubt they have presented a well-respected work about climate change denial, which has been cited http://scholar.google.de/scholar?cites=3604367220790983448&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=de more than 800 times since publication in 2010. And now Serten uses Grundmann's single opinion (the Heartland Institute is criticised by Oreskes, so that doesn't count) to fully rebut Merchants of Doubt, of course without mentioning all the scientific praise for the book. If you takes this, the missing of elemental notability standards and add the POV in the Grundmann article, the solution can only be the deletion of the article. --Special:Contributions/84.170.141.233|84.170.141.233
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Almost all of this article was created without consideration of Wikipedia's |reliable sources guidelines. I acknowledge the effort but Wikipedia does not publish content in this way and this article is the result of an unfortunate misunderstanding. The misunderstanding is that the papers written by the subject of the article are cited as sources of his work, when instead Wikipedia reports what other people have said about the subjects of articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)