Deletion of Rachel Mandelbaum

Comment: I don't think the Falco-DeBenedetti Career Development Professorship is good enough for #C5 (its name makes it sound like a mid-career thing rather than a higher-level distinguished professorship) but looking at Google scholar and discounting the SDSS hits still gives a convincing pass of #C1. And I think coverage of a project she leads in a ''Nature'' news piece http://www.nature.com/news/astronomers-use-fake-data-to-tackle-dark-energy-1.14020 is another indication of significance. (See also https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160125114233.htm http://www.universetoday.com/60030/this-is-getting-boring-general-relativity-passes-yet-another-big-test/ http://www.astronomy.com/news-observing/news/2010/03/scientists%20say%20einsteins%20theory%20applies%20beyond%20the%20solar%20system for less-high-profile media coverage of her research
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: The nominator is correct to imply that it is difficult to ascertain the degree of independent achievement with papers with such vast numbers of co-authors. However, Looking at the well-cited papers with fewer co-authors, I find provisionally that rof#C1 is passed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)