Deletion of Royal Bliss

Comment: Absolutely no third-party external sources have been added to this article, even though this AfD has been open for days. The band itself is regional, not even continental in scope. If you want to argue from , start adding sources. As it is, this article fails completely
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: the article is a real hash that is difficult to try and pick out the relevant notable bits from. It looks like they're getting some airplay at major stations, but I'm not convinced by the sources from Pharmboy; local newspapers often do cover local bands, and I don't see anything from outside of the SLC area. My own search turned up a few possibles, but most of them were from SLC and needed buying to see the damn things. Mediabase does seem to be a fairly good chart, but I can't see below #30 to confirm the statement in the article. I also can't really confirm that they're with Capitol. I can't confirm they meet any of the  requirements - I can't tell if their indie releases were on a notable label or not. If someone turns up better sources or clears up any of these issues, I'd be happy to reconsider
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: Signed to capitol records http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:rlZDl_IXjC0J:www.notc.com/default.cfm+%22royal+bliss%22+capitol+-myspace&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=ca&client=firefox-a, http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2007/fbytes_2007-06-07.cfm. This passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)