Deletion of Kristi Yamaoka (6th nomination)

Comment: Disruptive repeat nomination.   is quite inadequate as justification because
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and .  Also consider that the subject is |not a public figure, so it is not necessarily our job to make sure her most public face is this article.  I have no real problem with a merger into "dangers of cheerleading", but I leave it up to editors who are interested and knowledgable in the subject matter to do that should the article be kept.  I also want to throw in my comment that this nomination is ''not'' disruptive
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP||WP:NPF)

Comment: Text book . Yes there have been multiple nominations of this article. Yes, the article has been kept. Yes, each result was incorrect. This article needs to be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: The incident and its effects if any on the rules for cheerleading are covered at Cheerleading#Dangers of cheerleading. Per . (Note to nominator: brevity is the soul of wit. People don't like to plow through paragraph after paragraph of musings in addition to the rationale for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Yobmod, the incident is already covered in c.  The Kristi Yamaoka article is being considered for deletion not because the notability of the accident is being questioned, but because Kristi Yamaoka's notability as a person is being questioned.    According to , if a person is only notable for one event (like a fall), then a biographical article on the person is not usually needed, especially if the event is the subject of another article, as is the case in this suituation
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)