Deletion of Future Group

Comment: per otability and erifiability - The subject have significant coverage (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Future-Group-contemplating-retailing-private-brands/articleshow/34639364.cms see here, http://paper.hindustantimes.com/epaper/showarticle.aspx?article=9e273828-4f70-4cb6-b6a1-86bcc90ecadf&key=i9d3o17wTwCgrvRjnCDc9w%3d%3d&issue=87332014052200000000001001 see here, http://zeenews.india.com/business/insurance-news/landamp-t-future-group-to-merge-general-insurance-biz_72965.html see here, http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/best-advice-i-ever-got-future-group-ashni-biyani/1/187508.html see here http://businesstoday.intoday.in/story/future-group-aditya-birla-nuvo-deal/1/24720.html see here) in the public domain but the article need some clean-up and cite styling
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)

Comment: per sources. Easily passes , although it needs a massive clean up and has a somewhat trivial embedded list
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article should be KEEP without further ado as a SNOW KEEP. This nomination should not have been made. A quick Google search and Google News search shows this firm is, without a doubt, notable passing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)