Deletion of List of American police officers killed in the line of duty

Comment: but, to be clear, a '''Conditional Keep''') - Agree with {{u|Clarityfiend}} that a stricter inclusion criteria is clearly needed here, given  and the guidelines at e.g. . This isn't about notability, but it seems like people are conflating notability of the concept of "death of law enforcement in the line of duty"  with "deaths of every police officer killed in the line of duty". I don't disagree that there's a good reason to have such a page, but it's not for Wikipedia. Keep on the condition of restricting it to notable individual examples. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SAL)

Comment: BUT only officers with articles. This is an appropriate list, but including everyone ''does'' smack of , as well as 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL||WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: Wikipedia:Incomplete lists|Incomplete lists are fine. List of numbers is a good example. The selection criteria are not vague: every law enforcement death is officially recognized as either in the line of duty or not. It's one or the other. |Surmountable issues are not a valid reason for deletion. So whatever problems may exist with the sources can be fixed. If the current content is too recent, that can be fixed. If it grows too large, that can be fixed by spawning sub-lists.  says "Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements." But this isn't about creating an ''article'' on every officer death. Many things in WP:NOT deal with not creating separate ''artices'' on a thing, which can be misunderstood to mean whole classes of content can't appear ''within'' an article or list. That's not what it means. in the Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates|Categories, lists, and navigation templates guidelines explains that some list member are all notable with their own article, but other lists are simply members of a group, in themselves not notable enough for a stand-alone article.If poorly sourced entries are being added, well, clean them up. It's not like every other list on Wikipedia doesn't suffer the same maintenance problem. That goes with the territory.The talk archive issue is https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_American_police_officers_killed_in_the_line_of_duty&diff=801180060&oldid=791308581 now fixed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:SURMOUNTABLE||WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:CSC)

Comment: per . Ignoring the ambiguities of what an "officer" is and what "in the line of duty" means, the issue is that, as it stands, this ''is'' essentially a memorial. The overwhelming majority of these deaths are not going to pass notability of themselves, and the level of detail is minimal; the principal source is a memorial itself. As a practical matter, there are already numerous such memorial pages in WP, generally organized around individual departments; I don't see how we need to make one grand union list of them all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL)