Deletion of Chandrashekar swamiji

Comment: Coming back to this, two of the keep comments are single focus users regarding this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PradeepKamath025 Contributions/PradeepKamath025 and Special:Contributions/14.141.106.36|14.141.106.36 both with glaring  issues if you review their contributions. That only leaves the single ''weak keep'' comment https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chandrashekar_swamiji&diff=674964654&oldid=674962370 from User:Yunshui all else that has no COI is leaning delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Per , any biography of a living person who advocates fringe theories must be written in a scrupulously |neutral fashion, and must summarize what high quality |reliable, independent sources say about the person. We have no such coverage available about this astrologer, so the topic is not notable and the article should be deleted
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGEBLP||WP:NPOV||WP:RS)

Comment: as  else  if he somehow meets GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:G11||WP:BLOWITUP)