Deletion of Mughalstan

Comment: I don't care about neutrality as much as verifiability. Agree with Ragib fails . Where are the sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: no verifiable sources.  I don't think any of the sources identified to date meet .  An offensive topic can stay, but an unverifiably sourced offensive topic cannot
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Passes  in my book; see http://www.cromwell-intl.com/security/nu/ipk.html. Definitely seems like a notable concept too; distasteful as it may seem, Wikipedia is |not censored. It will need some attention to keep it in line with , though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Have not seen any indication that the idea is notable - e.g. a subject of publications in a number of , have a sizable amount of supporters, etc. We do not have to popularize ideas that exist only on a few fringe internet forums
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)