Deletion of Diwon

Comment: This might fall under , and the |puffery herein kind of makes me lean toward that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:PEACOCK)

Comment: per DGG. Also, the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to maintain a stand alone article per . Once you have that, errors in the article, other problems, etc. can be fixed. '''Comment:''' User:Gobonobo's initial AFD request is a valid request and the reasons given in the nomination for deletion are clear enough to develop this discussion. Two people can disagree on what it takes to meet  without one having bad motives and should not have to endure public accusuations from others about having bad motives. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith: {{quote|text=''Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives without clear evidence
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)