Deletion of Parabola GNU/Linux

Comment: This is my analysis of Parabola according to the criteria in , which says if it meets any one of the below then it may be considered notable. I wouldn't consider any one of these to be satisfactorily met, but would be willing to give multiple "half points" to allow notability. If I missed anything, speak up
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: It has a complete profile on DistroWatch, which is an independent |reliable source and which is cited in the article. This alone should be sufficient to establish notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The DistroWatch entry is user submitted. I don't see how the website approving it to be posted shows notability. That is just like submitting a comment on an article to a reliable source and having the reliable source approve the comment. FSF is not an independent source. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I can find no signficant independent reliable sources covering this disro to establish notability.   is an essay, and not a guideline.  AS for the sourcing presented above, Distrowatch is not a reliable source per the discussion aboce, nor does the endorsemnt of the FSF denote notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: as non-notable.  The comments about Distrowatch above appear to show that it is not a |reliable source in our sense, and endorsement by FSF as meeting their requirements is just that, not evidence that anyone uses or cares about it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)