Deletion of Adrian Parr

Comment: Certainly much puffery here but that is no reason to delete. However cites in GS appear to be 114, 38, 15, 14..? This is not enough to pass rof#C1. Too early
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Numerous reliable sources are available, including book reviews, so the subject more than meets the notability guidelines of . There are also independent sources with which to meet . Concerns about the article's promotional tone, puffery and SPA contributors can be addressed by editing, and are not valid policy-based reasons for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: per . Further reviews of Parr's works can be found at {{doi|10.4245/sponge.v4i1.14196}}, {{doi|10.1080/07293682.2012.734833}}, {{doi|10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.136}} (one of three books reviewed), {{doi|10.1353/abr.2010.0072}}, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k89d2h0, http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1958809&show=abstract
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)