Deletion of List of nude celebrities

Comment: Before anyone complains about the lack of sourcing for the movies, I would like to quote the applicable policy, which in this case would be that relating to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Plot|film plots, which states that: “Plot summaries do not normally require citations; the film itself is the source, as the accuracy of the plot description can be |verified by watching the film
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: while LoNC does make some points this article is a clear example of  and should be deleted. Also this topic is not notable enough to merit its own article. If a notable subject has done a nude performance and that performance is notable it should either be added to the performance's article or to the celebrity's article. This list has no place in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: The appropriate title for this article isn't "List of nude celebrities", but is "List of celebrities who have appeared nude in some capacity". In order for a list to be warranted, the subject of the list itself must be notable, and the subjects who appear on the list must be notable. In the case of this article, however, you have almost the exact opposite, as it makes a point of excluding pornographic actors, nude models, and anyone else whose career focuses on them exposing their bodies. In this case, what you end up with is a list of people who have appeared nude in some form of media, but are still not notable for their nudity. In addition, you have the problem of the scope of the article being far too broad. Even a list of actors who have appeared nude would be close to unmanageable, yet the term "celebrity" extends to virtually all members of the entertainment media. One could argue that the term "celebrity" would narrow the possible number of people who could be included on the list, but in the opposite ends up happening, as "celebrity" is a highly subjective term. Yes, Pamela Anderson is clearly a celebrity, but it Gillian Anderson a celebrity? I don't know, maybe, maybe not. Furthermore, the article actually goes a step further, to include people who have appeared nude in some form of medai, as well as people who have appeared nude ''outside of the entertainment media''. What this ends up coming down to is a list that is inconcievably vast, which has the potential to include any entertainer who has ever been seen nude, while giving little regard to notability or subjectiveness. The information may appear to be well organized, but in the end the inclusion criteria alone is not, and this is a prime example of an |indiscriminate collection of information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:DIRECTORY)

Comment: I submit ''http://www.amazon.com/Mr-Skins-Skincyclopedia-Z-Actresses/dp/0312331444/ Mr. Skin's Skincyclopedia: The A-to-Z Guide to Finding Your Favorite Actresses Naked'' and ''http://www.amazon.com/Bare-Facts-Video-Guide-2001-Guide/dp/0962547492/ The Bare Facts Video Guide'' as "''significant coverage in reliable sources''" which make a list like this |notable. Any problems with the title can be solved by renaming (e.g. List of actors and actresses who have appeared nude); and if excluding porn stars, Playboy models, etc., is a problem, it could be changed to incorporate them by reference, by saying "See also: :Category:Lists of porn stars, :Category:Adult models, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)