Deletion of The Gallowgate

Comment: I think the more important criteria can be found under .  As is stated there: "The article itself must provide proof that its subject meets one of these criteria via inlined links or a "Reference" or "External link" section."  If you can present evidence that it meets one of those points there then it should be able to stay.  Also, about the vandal, the reason I assume it came from The Gallowgate is because the same user added information about specific users to the article.  If the user was a rival of the site you would think the information would be vandalism
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Non-notable, failing ; unencyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: per nom and  CSCWEM pretends not to want to use those new admin tools, but in a few weeks he'll be speedying like crazy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)