Deletion of Vivian Full

Comment: Wikipedia is not a place where every working actor is automatically entitled to an article just because they exist — the article must be supported by |reliable sources which verify something that constitutes an  pass. But apart from one-off guest roles in TV, all she has is one significant role in a direct-to-DVD film, which is not enough. And neither are the Joey Awards a major film or television award for which a win or a nomination counts toward NACTOR — they're a PR event staged by a promotional organization for young actors, not a real industry award remotely equivalent to the Oscars or the Emmys or the Canadian Screen Awards. And for sourcing, what we have here is a press release and the PR award's own website about itself, which is not reliable sourcing. No prejudice against recreation in the future when there's more substance and better sourcing available, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia about people who have ''already'' attained notability, not a free PR platform for publicizing ''aspiring'' future notables
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:NACTOR)

Comment: as .  is marginal with one significant role in a film with no article and a significant role upcoming. Others are minor roles. Only passing mention in sources so  not met. One award and one nomination for an award. No Wikipedia article for the award itself and I am uncertain whether or not the award itself is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:NACTOR||WP:BASIC)

Comment: as per Geraldo Perez, except that subject is a full  fail (not marginal), and is an almost certain  fail (e.g. no mentions in ''Variety'' or ''The Hollywood Report'') as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACTOR||WP:GNG)