Deletion of Jonathan Huebner

Comment: He does not meet , as noted by David Eppstein above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Lack of substantial coverage in relaible independent independent sources. Transitory coverage in the popular press does little to establish notability. No evidence that the subject meets any of out notability requirements, particularly . No evdience of significant and lasting impact in the scholarly community
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I don't think one paper with only 38 citations in Google scholar is enough to hang a case for  on
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He does not meet , as noted by David Eppstein above; and as for GNG, his only notable paper was covered in a couple of mainstream sources at the time ((http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/050707/7inventor.htm US News and World Report, http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7616 New Scientist) but does not seem to have made much of an enduring mark
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)