Deletion of Long face syndrome

Comment: It's not a good article; it's certainly not , and it's a shame the NOM hadn't taken the trouble to spend a few minutes on Google. (Do please read ). There are serious sources going back to 1976 which clearly refer to it as a genuine syndrome, so I believe it meets . See https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1067758 here and also http://medcraveonline.com/JDHODT/JDHODT-02-00071.pdf this literature review. I will add them have added them  to the article, and have reworded its contents
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:BEFORE||WP:N)

Comment: WP:Snowball.  No compliance with efore.  I've added references and text.  ot paper
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Bots (WP:B||WP:N)