Deletion of Leann Hunley

Comment: per above. I'd ask the nominator to, if they state in the very nomination that the article should probably be kept and lacks contentious content, consider doing a cursory , find some basic sources, or try to bring it to other editors' attention if that's not an option, instead of immediately bringing it to AfD, given the bureaucratic burden an AfD means when we have to discuss "should we have this article?" instead of "how can we make this article better
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: WP:N: "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article." Even a casual  finds a profile in ''People'' https://people.com/archive/splitting-from-days-of-our-lives-emmy-winner-leann-hunley-finds-a-nighttime-job-on-dynasty-vol-26-no-21/, confirmation of Emmy win in ''Los Angeles Times'' http://articles.latimes.com/1986-07-18/entertainment/ca-16840_1_daytime-emmy-winners, discussion in a book https://books.google.com/books?id=YnfjAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT69, for example. Many more articles with in-depth coverage show up in newspaper archives from the 1980s, eg "UW dropout Leann Hunley finds her calling on 'Dynasty'" (''Seattle Times'' 05 May 1987: F1), "Days Of Our Lives fans will miss Leann Hunley" (''Toronto Star'' 01 Nov 1986: S92), "Leann Hunley has a date with an angel" (''St. Petersburg Times'' 09 Feb 1988: 7D). Subject easily passes  and  
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:GNG||WP:NACTOR)