Deletion of Internet brigades (3 nomination)

Comment: Original research, and clear violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: per , seriously this article has only one purpose to make a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN||WP:POINT)

Comment: Oh god, not another one of Biophys' pet /  articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:POINT)

Comment: First, may I please ask "delete" voters to stop |attacking Biophys? "Comment on content, not on the contributor." And also may I ask that attempts to silence criticism of the Moscow regime &mdash; '''a government that perpetrates brutal killings, torture, abuse and violence, that carries out unlawful killings, politically motivated abductions, and disappearances in Chechnya, Ingushetiya and elsewhere in the North Caucasus, that has dramatically weakened freedom of expression and media independence by shutting down television networks, harassed, intimidated and even killed journalists (and for that matter set up Internet brigades), is rampantly corrupt, and has turned the Duma into a rubber-stamp while centralizing vast powers in the President (or now his ''eminence grise'')''' &mdash; not be made through blithe, dismissive references to "Putinphobia"? Yes, a man who does all that absolutely ''is'' to be feared! OK, now to the policy reasons for keeping this article. First, no matter how much some may deny this, the phenomenon has been documented in reliable sources, the martyred Politkovskaya not least among them. Second, with expansion of the article to cover Red China and Western nations, we see this is not a Russia-only phenomenon, but one that has been found in other places too, again in reliable sources. Third, this may be the best name we have - though if someone comes up with a better one, by all means let's consider it - but a bad name is ''not'' a rationale for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: invented term. |Coatrack OR, i.e., |synthesis of a new term unduly internationalized: At very best the term may be applied to translate the russian conspiracy theory given in Russian language references
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK||WP:SYNTH)

Comment: Not only is a conspiracy theory presented as a fact, but the article mainly contains |original research coupled with referenced opinion pieces in a |novel synthesis, thing against Wikipedia policy. Something can be salvaged, but certainly not the article in its current form
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH)