Deletion of Vera Chapman (New Zealand artist)

Comment: Qualifies under  #4. "The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." The New Zealand Academy of Fine Arts is a notable gallery as is the Centre of Contemporary Art a notable facility where notable exhibitions take place. As is the Supreme Court of New Zealand. She painted the official portrait of her father, who was the first Supreme Court Judge of New Zealand actually born in New Zealand. It would be a shame if this notable subject was deleted, especially given she is one of the few celebrated professional female painters in New Zealand in the early 20th century. She is also known as '''Vera Eichelbaum'''. Her personal papers are held in the New Zealand National Library https://natlib.govt.nz/records/22376867
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: wihtout addressing notability directly, I want to note that the arguments for considering the Supreme court painting of her father as meeting  ("multiple collections") are not so strong. Her father was a Supreme Court of New Zealand judge in.. https://teara.govt.nz/en/biographies/3c10/chapman-frederick-revans wait for it... Wellington. It is highly likely that her work made it to that collection as a result. A judge is powerful position, and he would only need to direct someone to buy it and hang it up.  is strong because it relies on independently curated work, not family connections. As http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/tei-PlaNine-t1-body-d1-d235.html the bio here says, "Moved to Wellington when father appointed judge there... Her portrait of her father is in Supreme Court, Wellington
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTIST)

Comment: Agree with nominator. Despite all the work put towards the referencing, it doesn't disguise the fact that the content consists of trivial mentions.  is not met, nor rtist
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:A)