Deletion of Place names considered unusual (3rd nomination)

Comment: The list is thoroughly backed by reliable and verifiable sources to support the claim of notability. This is the English Wikipedia, and the definition of unusual is based on the speakers of this language as documented by reliable and verifiable sources, all of which conclusively rebuts claims of  or 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:OR)

Comment: referenced, and therefore, in this case, |verifiable. It's not OR, and NPOV is followed, since "unusual" in this case is according to the sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: violates  and  as what is "unusual" in one country or even region is usual or the norm in another. The "centralized discussion" is unpersuasive that consensus has supposedly changed for these subjective "unusual" lists, as many of the comments there boil down to "generally I think these are not a great idea but there's one I do like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NPOV)