Deletion of Columbia University tunnels

Comment: Even if the notability issue is satisfied (and, as the nominator, I feel it has been), there are still serious |original research issues here, including the map (of unknown accuracy), and many of the specific locations of the tunnels. Anything that ''can't'' be sourced should be removed from the article; if there's not enough remaining to constitute a full article, it should be merged
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: The articles in Wired and New Yorker technically satisfy 's requirement of substantial coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources. Also see "New York Underground" by Julia Solis, http://books.google.com/books?id=EpdwcewZ2rgC&pg=RA23-PA168&dq=%22columbia++university%22+tunnel&as_brr=0&ei=aWrkRsOOKpzApALXrpDNDg&sig=3rjSZQphN0EDDsICMTgZgmrbfBU pp 168-170:"Columbia's tunnel system is said to be the largest of any university in America, and is probably the most famous." This source also says the tunnels played an important role in the Manhattan Project.  There is nothing "inherently non-notable" about an extensive and historic tunnel system connecting the buildings of a prominent university. If anything, it could be merged to an article about the university rather than deleting such well-sourced  material. Any unsourced statements can be deleted. That's what we call "editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Fascinating, but unnotable (many universities have tunnel "systems" of varied complexity). Most of the article fails  flat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)