Deletion of John Charcol

Comment: While the sources themselves may meet the criteria for reliability, the references fail the criteria for establishing notability since they are either routine announcements, mentions-in-passing where an employee is fired or relying on company-produced information or quotations from company sources. Fails  and  and therefore GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)

Comment: I checked the 2nd half of your links - one is behind an FT paywall (7), 6 felt a little close to what I would start classifying as outine (i.e. brief article in trade publication regarding potential sale of company). 8, 9 and 10 are links I already posted. Can they be considered significant coverage? They feel very much like brief mentions. It's not ''about'' the company per se, and in my subjective interpretation of ''significant'', this falls considerably short
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)

Comment: per King's point. A large number trivial mentions in sources does not meet Wikipedia's  standards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)