Deletion of Slow living

Comment: what a dreadful, dreadful article. Yes, the subject is a thing, but best blow it up and start over per : "if the article's content is useless (including all the versions in |history) but the title might be useful, then delete the content to help encourage a new article. If you keep the article, then you're keeping something of no value until someone replaces it with something of value, and people tend to be more inclined to fill ed links|red links
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:PAGEHIST||WP:R)

Comment: The topic comfortably passes  per a review of available online sources. Entire books are devoted to the topic
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)