Deletion of Joshua Beloya (2nd nomination)

Comment: The subject has made no professional appearances, so fails . Also, despite contrary arguments in the last AfD, there is nothing beyond routine coverage of Beloya in any reliable sources. Local sources and football reports are not helpful; a mention in a national source outside of the sports pages would be necessary for him to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: I don't see it meeting 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Per the same rationale as last week, nothing has changed, so why the renomination? I agree that this person fails the |notability guidelines for footballers. However, the subject of the article http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Joshua+Beloya%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1 has received |significant coverage in |reliable third party sources and meets the |general notability guidelines and the |notability guidelines for biographies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:BIO)

Comment: fails  and . Nowhere near enough "significant coverage" to meet GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)