Deletion of 2014 Dijon attack

Comment: as part of significant coverage so passes . Yes, we are  but if there is a critical analysis provided by the source then its not a routine coverage. This article has multiple sources providing significant coverage with critical analysis. Then, the notability is not temporary per . Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: due to , and high quality at that, sourced by E.M.Gregory. Note that that whether the attack itself was terror or not is irrelevant for the notability - what matters is coverage, which in this case exists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: not a terrorist attack and does not meet  either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)

Comment: Contrary to nominating statement,  shows two university press books (including a 2017 book by Philippe-Joseph Salazar) discussing this attack as an instance in which an individual is categorized by French authorities as acting out of mental illness, but by terrorism experts an a terrorist attack.  These two assertions are, of course, not mutually exclusively; convicted criminals motivated by personal and political factors can also have histories of mental illness.  My point, however, is that despite Nom's assertion, there has been 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: Even now, with the recent "expansion" (as it will soon be claimed) by Gregory, the article has been bombarded by fragmented quotes and half-truths to create the illusion of ongoing coverage. Gregory has even attempted to frame this as a terror attack despite no evidence in reliable sources. Shameful and shady: the subject is not not notable, before or after the "expansion", but at least it was much more accurate than it is now. I am also citing  concerns as a consequence of these gross inaccuracies
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: WP:NOTNEWS doesn't apply its not  ''routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia'' meets  and  more then enough to keep the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:DIVERSE||WP:PERSISTENCE)