Deletion of Kazuo Hiramatsu

Comment: as the president of a university, passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: Strong keep''': Sourcing only to primary sources, if those sources are reliable, is not a reason to delete a page that has presumed notability under . It is also not an accurate description of this page, since both sources currently cited are secondary, and the news article looks independent. As the president of a large university, a member of national advisory councils, and the president of a major professional society, he passes NACADEMIC criterion #6 and surely passes several others. And a , including looking at the Japanese page, shows that secondary sources exist even if they aren't yet included
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per #C6, possibly speedy as the nominator appears not to have even considered  notability and secondary sources are not required for that kind of notability. Additionally the nominator appears not to have done  as even the most cursory and obvious thing one might try (checking the Japanese-language version) finds more sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF||WP:BEFORE)