Deletion of CFPP-FM

Comment: With the sources added, I believe this brings the article in line with NMEDIA and GNG.  I also thing it brings it out of danger of being deleted under AfD rules as well.  Also,  and just because a station turns in it's license does not mean it is no longer notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:BCASTOUTCOMES)

Comment: License-exempt church stations, which already lack the |presumption of notability for broadcast stations (which is reserved for stations that ''have'' a license), are unlikely to generate the sufficient coverage in |reliable sources to satisfy the |general notability guideline, much less be independently notable of the church that runs the station. (And given that most of the results I'm seeing about the church that holds the CFPP-FM license are in fact about CFPP, including CRTC pages, directories, and Wikipedia and its mirrors…) Really, the assignment of a "regular" call sign is all that distinguishes CFPP-FM from the various Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VF8027|religious Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VF/religious stations|VF Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VF8004|stations whose articles were deleted at AfD a few years ago — and of course that alone isn't going to get over any notability humps. (Oddly enough, http://www.broadcasting-history.ca/listing_and_histories/radio/vf8027-fm at least one of those VF stations is actually ''more'' powerful than http://www.broadcasting-history.ca/listing_and_histories/radio/cfpp-fm CFPP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST||WP:RS||WP:GNG)