Deletion of Iconic Photograph

Comment: I have concerns about the current version of the page but I don't think they're insurmountable.  (The definition is uncited, the article is overly reliant on a single source, the title shouldn't have a capital "p".) Contrary to the nominator's assertion, the article is not a  but a critical discussion of a phenomenon, citing scholarly research. We have an article on cultural icons in general so why not an article on cultural icons that are photographs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: o original research is a core policy and it cannot be ignored in this way. An article of this kind needs to meet the criteria of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists, |not made up criteria. For example, :Category:Photographs contains photos that meet the notability criteria, and based on this, a List of photographs could be made. What Iconic Photograph does is substitute otability criteria with original research and a grab bag of varying opinions about why this or that critic thinks a photo was important
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NOTMADEUP||WP:N)