Deletion of List of salaries of royal family members

Comment: per nom. In addition, this list itself is illogical: it claims to focus on the costs of constitutional monarchy cost-benefit analysis|without the financial nor social benefits accruing to those countries with that system of governance. As the waggish former Queen of Netherlands once said, her role is to increase tourism and provide free media for her Holland: "It's like selling House of Orange-Nassau|oranges." The United Kingdom keeps its royalty in part for the chance to sell stamps and to further increase the flood of American tourists. It's the net worth or ''net cost'' that matters; the gross cost of a system of government is a meaningless statistic, hence, |this list fails
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: because, as the nominator says, the sources do not appear to be particularly reliable, or measure the same criteria. The overall figures will be adequately covered by Monarchies_in_Europe#Costs and it is likely to lead to all sorts of  to conjure up figures for individual members of royal families
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)