Deletion of JetBrains

Comment: I added a reference to the JAX 2012 award for most innovative Java company. No members of the jury appear to work for JetBrains, so this looks like a reliable source. While one can argue how much of a victory the ComponentSource awards and the Reader's Choice awards are, they both look like reliable sources. Multiple awards suggest notability, as #Inclusion states that the software is notable if ''The software is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field.'' I consider these awards to be significant coverage about the company; if so, the awards also seem to satisfy the  requirements. The article is somewhat promotional, but this is a surmountable problem, per . Notability of the topic along wth surmountable problems suggests that this article be kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:SURMOUNTABLE)

Comment: Winning third place for "Collaboration, Project Management & Agile Solutions" from a trade magazine is not the sort of |significant impact to get a business a standalone article in an encyclopedia.  I'm more concerned over the substantial walled garden of non-notable products we have here, especially given that this business makes ''software for software developers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)