Deletion of Footstep (Band)

Comment: Obvious NN band. No hits on google even remotely related to this band. Only links supporting this article are MySpace pages. Username of creator suggests a violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: as n-n . User above: anyone who edits an article is considered an editor
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: Nota notable band,  article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY)

Comment: as NN although it should have been speedied per A7.  At the time I nominated it for speedy, the false claim of being Grammy nominated had not yet been made, and was apparently made solely to sidestep speedy deletion.  It's definitely |snowing in Australia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: Near as I can tell, it looks like the user is actually a member of this band and thinks for whatever reason that it's heaps more notable than it really is. , ,  and other reasons apply as to why this shouldn't be kept. Even though it's an essay and not a policy, it doesn't comply with  #1, if I'm right in assuming this (and that applies even if it's a ''notable'' band
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY||WP:SNOWBALL||WP:OWN||WP:BAI)