Deletion of List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States

Comment: mdash;this clearly meets , which tells us that a list topic ''is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources''.  here are two examples from the National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: No, it's not hardly as noteworthy as the ones mentioned in the  argument above. A police officer being shot and killed while on duty is a very different thing than a hoodlum being shot and killed. Cop killing is rare and significant; criminals getting shot is routine  stuff. The vast majority of these incidents are rampantly |unnotable, while those that ''are'' notable are notable enough to have independent articles on the subject (thus calling for a category, not a list). As it stands, though, this is a ''wildly''  list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF||WP:DOGBITESMAN||WP:GNG||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: for several reasons.  This is unencyclopedic because it is divided into "2011" and "everything else", and also because there's no encyclopedic justification for this material ("existence is not notability", remember).  There are a lot of people killed by law enforcement officers, and many times because said people were violent criminals. Therefore,  would seem to apply.  We have safely established that these incidents are not notable in the GNG sense (as that has not been contested), and there is spurious intersection because none of the cases is related to any other.  The individuals themselves are not notable ( at best).  We have a whole category of :Category:Deaths in police custody.  There is also a POV, NOTNEWS, and overcat problem - the 2011 stuff is easily as long as "everything else" (time bias) and is culled from news (which we are not); "everything else" is from material already on Wikipedia and covered in categories (as noted earlier
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: Although a list of notable perps or notable incidents might be encyclopedic, almost every entry in this collection would be rejected by failing . It does not gain notability by sheer numbers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: People are seriously arguing that the phenomenon of American police officers killing people is not notable? I'm sensitive to the argument that most of the individuals are not in themselves notable, and under other circumstances I might agree that a list composed mostly of non-bluelinks was inappropriate, but given the existence of many lists of non-notable police officers killed on duty (thanks ThaPolice), I feel it is necessary to keep this list in the interest of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)