Deletion of Marita Covarrubias

Comment: Per , we have articles for characters that are covered by independent reliable sources. This article has worthwhile coverage from ''Cinefantastique'', ''Entertainment Weekly'' and several published books examining ''The X-Files''. There's a good Reception section in the article. This article is in a lot better shape than most; there's no reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Not any valid reasons given for AfD. This is just 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Questionable nomination.  Seems like a case of .  Reading the nom, I expected to see what a lot of bad fictional character articles have: only in-universe info, no reception, no real-world info. Then looking at the article, I find a well-written well-sourced reception section based on real-world coverage.  It's even at Good Article status...  It is true that we don't need an article for every character on every show, but that does not mean we cannot have articles such as this when they meet 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG)