Deletion of Gene Freidman

Comment: Notable business man, ample  coverage of his career to establish notability.  Searches using terms  terms like Friedman + "taxi kingpin" https://www.google.com/search?q=Frriedman++%22taxi+kingpin%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8, and Friedman "https://www.google.com/search?q=Frriedman++%22taxi+king%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8" make notability clear.   simply does not apply to a businessman who has been in the headlines for years.(It does not matter who created the article, or why.  What matters is notability documented by years of news coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME)

Comment: I'm https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&oldid=798605644#Article_deletion_for_TOU_violations.3F unable to find any policy which says we delete articles just because they were created by TOU-violators.  I was also able to find coverage in  that goes back to 2013 which has nothing to do with spouse abuse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: per nom, per {{U|DGG}} and per , and for the benefit of  {{U|World&#39;s Lamest Critic}}, I would reiterate DGG's words: ''As for creation by a banned editor, there are a whole range of possible reasons.The rule is that we delete unless some regular experienced editor takes responsibility
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I think the Terms of Use supersede the |biographies of living persons policy.  I think there are very few people who advocate undisclosed paid editing in the community so I would err on the side of deletion without prejudice to re-creation by an uninvolved editor
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)