Deletion of Mir Asedullah Quadri

Comment: and probably salting as well. This is a situation where nobody outside the subject's fanbase seems to have ever heard of him. This has nothing to do with religion ''per se''; we have and welcome plenty of Muslim editors, as well as believers of all kinds. This has to do with |verifiability, a core value here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (:WP:V)

Comment: Writing books is not necessarily notable. There are at the time of posting no references at all, except links to a non-independent website promoting the ideas of the subject. To those who claim to want to 'follow him on Wkiipedia' - sorry, but that's not what Wikipedia is for. Try AboutUs or LinkedIn for free hosting (well, they were free last time I looked...). As to 'hating' the subject, we've seen that argument here at AfD many times (and will probably see it again). Personally, I'd never heard of the subject before, know very little about him now, and won't worry if I never hear of him again. Equally, I won't worry if you come up with a load of reliable independent references that show that he is widely known, covered in reliable sources, adviser to national presidents and well suited to having an article here. I do change my !vote, and so will most regular editors, so long as the evidence is there. Please look at  (about reliable sources) and  (about biographies of living people
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BLP)

Comment: The site said it is "TOP RATED ONLINE SHOPPING MALL" - clearly not a reliable source by our criteria at 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)