Deletion of List of Louisiana Baptist University people (second nomination)

Comment: article as nn list of mostly nn people.  an indiscriminate collection of information. I would not oppose merging '''only''' the more notable names who already have WP articles into the main LBU article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Please |refrain from personal attacks. Disagree with the idea, not the person. I am not using this statement to attack a specific side of the debate, as both sides are violating this policy. Also, |stay cool when the editing gets hot. This is the internet, which means that everybody should have the capability to give their points of view without directly offending others
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA||WP:COOL)

Comment: Upon reviewing the http://wiki4christ.com/ Wiki 4 Christ site, and its objectives, I have several comments to make. It is fine that you are creating this organization, but Wikipedia's |vanity rules take priority over everything. Lists of alumini on unaccredited universities and biographies on non-notable Christian missionaries are unacceptable. If you have a dispute, create your own wiki site
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VAIN)

Comment: The quoted phrase from your post above, "''or the merits of accreditation''," is incorrect. Wikipedia is  a directory of vanity. I agree with the merge, but Louisiana Baptist University is an List of unaccredited institutions of higher learning|unaccredited institution of higher learning and is ''not'' notable enough to deserve its own page for alumini. The only thing more ridiculous is that there are vanity biographies made of these non-notable people featured on the alumini. Finally, Jason Gastrich is making personal attacks and encouraging people who obviously do not know the entire situation to blindly support him via email. I am not criticizing Christianity, but this method of vote stacking is inexplicably ludicrous. I am trying very hard to restraining myself from making stronger comments, but that may not be possible in the near future
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)