Deletion of Rick Norwood

Comment: per nom, subject clearly fails ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I do not appreciate that nearly all of the article was self-written by Norwood (Wikipedia:Autobiography, ). If he's notable, it should not be written by the subject himself. He has a very nice resume as an editor and other roles, but none of the sources are independent, reliable, and substantive to verify notability and assert that his publications stand out from run-of-the-mill film/TV reviewing or specialized columns. Being quoted in another book neither contributes to notability nor does it need to be mentioned here. Now if other editors, ''preferably those who were not canvassed by the writer/subject and have a connection to him'' can show he passes , that's terrific but this should be deleted and allowed to be started over
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:GNG)

Comment: I think Nom pegged it.  Long list of books an publications, no indication that any of then are notable, despite valiant efforts by page's creator to source it.  I can find no evidence that this individual meets , , or 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:CREATIVE||WP:GNG)