Deletion of Robert L. Birmingham

Comment: edit conflict}} passes #5 Also authored https://www.law.uconn.edu/faculty/scholarship-robert-l-birmingham quite a few articles so passes #4 https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1705/ published at Indiana University School of Law, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol18/iss1/2/ published Duke, https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/2215/ published Minnesota Law Review, https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol20/iss4/10/ published Hastings Law Journal etc. I question the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:NACADEMIC||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Just being a professor for a long time isn't enough to be notable. #C5 is about named chairs, which he does not hold, and superlative titles like Distinguished Professor, which likewise. One well- but not outstandingly-cited publication isn't the kind of substantial body of work that #C1 is about, either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:PROF)

Comment: per  C1.  Subject is notable for originating the idea of efficient breach of contract (in his highly cited GS article), which has gotten a fair bit of discussion in the legal literature.  The article here needs some cleanup and trimming, but as usual, AfD is not cleanup
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: I don't think a single paper that is well-cited but not exceptional beyond that can be enough for . And there seems to be nothing else. Certainly being the next one to reach retirement age is not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I believe that  #1 is satisfied by https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C47&q=%22Robert+L.+Birmingham%22 having hundreds of publications on Google Scholar, the leading one having over 400 citations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)