Deletion of List of social software (2nd nomination)

Comment: Textbook  nomination. Obvious and strong navigational aid of notable software, list is not indiscriminate and has a clear cut selection criteria. Requiring editing is not a reason to delete, per |deletion policy. We |do not have a deadline so the list can stay ''aeons'' in this state and everything be jolly good: we're a voluntary project where people pick up stuff if and when they want it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:ATD||WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: the "keep but source" conclusion of the last afd (based on what 3 !votes?) has as pointed out, resulted in "keep but not source" which is a violation of basic wikipedia guidelines . . If no sources have been found in three years, those claiming that such sources exist really need to . Special:Contributions/Active_Banana|''Active
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:LIST||WP:PROVEIT)