Deletion of Japan–Lebanon relations

Comment: unless multiple, independent, in-depth sources are found. Russavia, what would you like this article to say? "Japan and Lebanon have had just one notable intersection in their history, the Japanese Red Army. For more information, see that article"? That's called |content forking. TallNapoleon, aside from the fact that several Japan-X relations articles have been deleted, the fact is we still can't presume notability, especially when the one salient fact - embassies - is already recorded at Diplomatic missions of Japan & Lebanon
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK)

Comment: Yet another disruptive nomination where the nominator has not even consulted . Ever here of the Japanese Red Army? Will an admin please put
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: On the other side of the world, not enough independent and reliable sources with significant content about the diplomatic relations of these two countries. Organizationally, better to mention in "Foreign relations of Lebananon" and "Foreign relations of Japan articles" or sections if somehow they can be shown to have had extensive military, trade, or cultural ties. Seems highly doubtful. Not enough  here  to satisfy , so only directory-type listing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)