Deletion of Michael Shellenberger

Comment: I concur with DGG that this isn't what BLP1E is designed for, and we should be careful of interpreting it too strictly in this case.  Everything in it is discussed in terms of news events, which is not what publication of a book is.  Also, despite being on a policy page it is phrased in terms of a guideline ("if reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is '''unlikely''' to be warranted", emphasis mine), so I don't think the argument that it overrides  is valid; at best, they are both on the same footing of being concepts that apply in most but not all cases
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: WP:BLP#Articles about people notable only for one event is policy while otability_(people)#Creative_professionals is a guideline so I think the first must be given more weight; in effect, the notability guideline also says at  that ''Marginal biographies on people with no independent notability can give undue weight to the events in the context of the individual, create redundancy and additional maintenance overhead, and cause problems for our neutral point of view policy. In such cases, a merge of the information and a redirect of the person's name to the event article are usually the better options. Cover the event, not the person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: This nomination is a misinterpretation of , which is intended to cover cases where people are caught up in events, not where they are notable for what they create. And the claim that this falls foul of  is an even greater misinterpretation. That clause exists to protect the privacy of people who have been thrust into the public eye without wishing it. This article subject obviously doesn't fall into that category
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NPF)