Deletion of Federico Alberto Cuello Camilo

Comment: Easily passes . Not only has he held multiple important diplomatic positions (two appointments as ambassador, representative to the UN, representative to the WTO),  he's been the subject of non-trivial coverage in reliable third-party sources (See the two links provided above plus for instance http://www.diariolibre.com/noticias/2009/05/08/i198801_federico-cuello-camilo-nuevo-embajador-ante-onu.html http://cchronicle.com/2010/03/ambassador-federico-camilo-on-the-role-of-the-dominican-republic-in-haitian-relief-efforts-and-future-of-haiti/ http://elnuevodiario.com.do/app/article.aspx?id=266532 http://www.lainformacion.com.do/noticias/economia/44366/embajador-en-londres-favorece-aumento-exportaciones-rd) Now the current tone of the article isn't acceptable but that's not a reason for deletion. I agree that it should be turned into a stub containing only the basic facts of his diplomatic career (at least those which appear in the sources listed in this discussion and in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)