Deletion of 2014 UEFA Europa League Final

Comment: This year's UEFA Europa League Final hasn't happened yet, next year's UEFA Europa League Final hasn't happened yet, how in the world could anyone believe that it is necessary to start writing an article about the UEFA Europa League Final which won't take place until ''the year after next''?  Per , these types of articles "are not appropriate article topics if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: It may technically pass , but there is not much to write until much later. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Does anybody actually read rystal when nominating? I cannot see how this article violates any of the five points listed. Point 1: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." Match is notable and almost certain to take place. Point 2: "Individual items from a predetermined list or a systematic pattern of names, pre-assigned to future events or discoveries, are not suitable article topics, if only generic information is known about the item." Non-generic information (venue) is known. Points 3-5, none of them applicable. So which part of rystal does this violate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Meets  ("Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)