Deletion of Debra Roberts

Comment: Fails  and . Most available online information is social media-related or redundant listings of her CV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I believe the subject passes rof#C1 In addition as David Eppstein has stated, the subject passes GNG as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: Her Google Scholar citation record (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=yuMSayAAAAAJ 10 papers with over 100 citations each, some singly-authored) gives her an easy pass of #C1 on top of any notability for heading IPCC
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: I think David Eppstein has made a good case for /. This isn't one of those instances where there might be an arguable pass of #C1 on citation counts alone but a lack of sources to actually write an article with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:PROF)

Comment: I'm convinced by the  C1, and the GNG aspects help support.  (I raise Loehle for consistency's sake, but certainly don't think we should use him to set precedent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Pass rof#C1 on GS cites
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)