Deletion of Gyroscope (Demo)

Comment: because it fails #Albums.Dan, the first demo of a band is *not* inherently notable, #Albums explicitly says that "''Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources.''"Gnan, the sources are reliable, but they hardly mention the album/demo at all. E.g. http://www.watoday.com.au/news/gig-previews--reviews/gyroscope/2008/05/15/1210765036727.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1 WAtoday.com only says that "''their first two releases were homemade cassette tapes''", and http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/07/01/1088488079209.html?from=storyrhs The Age says "''their first two releases were cassette-only affairs in 1997 and 1998 that both sold all 500 copies made''" (which is not even quite congruent with the article). That's it, and that's not enough to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: fails notability per #Albums
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: My gut says to keep such a well-sourced, well-formatted, good-looking article ( is satisfied after all, and  too). But Amalthea makes a strong argument. I guess I just don't see the harm
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NPOV)