Deletion of Molly Shattuck

Comment: Sources above pass . We're not here to judge ''why'' a subject is notable. We're not here to put our personal tastes in judging notability. Yes, I personally don't care about this cheerleader. But she is notable. There are sources that allow an article to be written. That's all we need
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: To some extent I share your dislike for similar "notable personalities". However, Molly Shattuck was the oldest NFL cheerleader, which was covered in reliable media: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/18/eveningnews/main953536.shtml CBSNews, http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20145009,00.html People.com, http://www.gelfmagazine.com/gelflog/archives/molly_shattuck_cheerleader_secret_millionaire.php Gelf Magazine etc. The subject meets , as ''"the person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field"''. In this case, the field is cheerleading. In my opinion, it is possible to write an encyclopedic article using reliable sources. All of this is absolutely uninteresting for me, but it could be interesting for someone else
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)