Deletion of Anadish Pal (2nd nomination)

Comment: Passes . Sources mentioned in RS are reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: but needs improvement. The article's subject meets |basic notability by virtue of the sources cited in the article. The Times of India, Hindustan Times, Telegraph, and Gulf News seem like they should qualify as "multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" and the pieces don't look like PR fluff to me. Regardless of whether the subject has actually accomplished anything or not, he has attracted sufficient attention from reliable sources to meet notability requirements
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)