Deletion of Pear Cable Audio Cables (2nd nomination)

Comment: on notability.  I would like to politely urge people to consider the notability requirement in  very carefully.  Multiple independent non-trivial writings must be referenced.  It cannot be argued that the sources that are provided are independent.  There are definitely multiple sources provided.  Non-trivial is really the only remaining hurdle to clear.  In describing what IS trivial,  says that a media reprint of a press release is trivial.  None of the sources provided are reprints of press releases (This cannot be questioned if they articles are examined).  The other examples given of trivial sources, are "newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories".  The sources provided are significantly more notable than an extended shopping hours note.  Really the only thing left is whether or not the sources themselves are trivial.  Again, I believe that the sources provided easily pass this hurdle.  People who know the automotive industry know who SEMA is.  People into high-end audio know who Positive Feedback online is, and VideoHiFi is yet another prolific audio review publication that while lesser known in the US, is well known in Itlay.  The examples given in  for notable sources are "Palo Alto Weekly" and "Many people" who "have published their own accounts of eating there".  I have never heard of "Palo Alto Weekly", but that does not make it trivial.  The other examples given for a restaurant suggest that just an individual publishing a restaurant review should qualify
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:CORP||WP:CORP)

Comment: Still doesn't establish notability as a player in the electronics or wire & cable industry. "High-end" audio "in universe" publications are basically going to mention every tidbit that happens in or is offered in that hobby, same way Model Railroader is going to mention every company that sells scale-model Rail spike|track spikes, because that's what their readers want. So, in context, the mentions can barely be considered non-trivial. The Italian page lists no less than 24 companies that assemble cables for this market, Pear Cable is just one, and is not the ''subject'' of the article. Some of the other companies that Apblake mentions probably ought to go bye-bye too, but equating this company's notability with companies like Audio-Technica is a stretch. Lastly, there is the issue of  as according to the PF article, {{vandal|Apblake}} is one of the principals of the company, although that's mitigated somewhat by the article itself not being excessively self-promoting or spammy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Respectfully, I truly fail to see any specific reason why, according to , Mavalli Tiffin Rooms restaurant is notable for having "Many people independent of the Mavalli Tiffin Rooms have published their own accounts of eating there" but Pear Cable Audio Cables is not when 2 independent publications have published reviews of listening to Pear Cable Audio Cables.  High-end audio publications are not more trivial than people who have eaten at Mavalli Tiffin Rooms.  High-end audio reviews are not more trivial than a person publishing there dining experience at a restaurant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I just do not see where users are getting their definition of trivial.   defines 2 types of trivial coverage.  The first type is a reprint of a company press release.  Here is a link to recent Pear Cable Audio Cables media coverage that would be classified as this type of trivial coverage: http://www.me-mag.com/installercentral/installer_news_body.cfm?nid=840.  The previous link is clearly "trivial" as a wikipedia source since it is based primarily on a Press Release.  None of the sources that are quoted in the article in question are of this type.  The 2nd type of trivial coverage is an article that reports "extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories".  SHOPPING HOURS!!!!!  Awards and reviews are not even close to shopping hours.  So, the question remains; where are users getting their definition of trivial from
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)