Deletion of Dwarf (Dungeons & Dragons)

Comment: or at worst '''merge''' to Dwarf (mythology) per above comments since there are  to retain, per  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: While both ''merge somewhere'' or a ''move'' might be a suitable thing to do, those deserve discussion outside of AfD. The question for AfD is whether this subject is notable for a page. I find the case somewhat marginal. Most D&D monsters are not notable for their own pages per , and at best should be merely mentioned on other pages. There is also a case that this article could be merged with an article about D&D or an article about dwarves in fantasy, but as it is not obvious which of these it should merge with, I do not propose that. As to notability, this subject goes some way beyond the usual sourcing of the player guides. There are many sources listed, and although the Gygax sources are primary, the TSR sources could be considered game guides, the tweets are in no way  etc., there are a few sources that stand out, such as this one.{{cite book | author=Bowman, Sarah Lynne | title=The Functions of Role-Playing Games | chapter=6. Role-Playing as Alteration of Identity | page=152 |date=May 2010 | publisher=McFarland | isbn=978-0786447107}} I had a quick read of the source and it does treat the subject of dwarves, although it is not extensive. Yet it is not just player guide either. The fact is that the Dwarves of D&D clearly are a core element and to some extent are independently notable. Although the case is marginal, I don't think this should be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:GAMEGUIDE||WP:RS)