Deletion of New Polish School of Holocaust Scholarship (conference)

Comment: This article in The Polish Review "Reflections on German and Polish Historical Policies of Holocaust Memory" has an entire section on the Paris conference (section 4, "Historians in the Public Sphere—A Case of the Paris Conference", but gives it a slightly different title "The New Polish School of History of the Holocaust” -- it's definitely the same conference though, same location, dates, and events (https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/polishreview.65.4.0036). An article in a scholarly journal devoting an entire section to this conference indicates lasting impact of the event.  The conference is also mentioned in an article in the Israel Journal of Public Affairs ("Rediscovering the Dream: A Proposal for a “Pivot” in Polish–Israeli Relations (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23739770.2019.1638137). This one calls the conference "“The New Polish School of Holocaust History.”) The fact that this conference is discussed as a case study in multiple sources indicates notability per . (Also, while I think there is already sufficient sourcing to demonstrate notability, the fact that the conference title is translated in multiple ways suggests that there may be even more sourcing to be found -- neither of these publications are currently referenced in the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERSISTENCE)

Comment: Coverage of the conference passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT)

Comment: I was neutral so I didn't voted but after examining sources one more is does meet  per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:DIVERSE)

Comment: Passes . I would have suggested a merge, but with several insitutions collaborating together to form the conference there is no good location to merge to. There is plenty of RS, and there is no good policy based argument for deletion.  clearly states that events are notable if they meet GNG, so I don't think a claim for failing that guideline is valid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:EVENT)

Comment: I admit that there is too much trivia in this article for my liking (the full list of presenters/titles is excessive) and I agree that it is the protest which gives the subject notability. However, I do ''not'' think this is an example of one-off event with no long-term significance of the kind that  is intended to catch, eg. motorway pile-ups or individual murders. It forms part of a wider confrontation between Polish historical memory and Holocaust studies which is certainly notable and is only partially addressed at Historical policy of the Law and Justice party. As for the coverage, Slatersteven is right that it was relatively sustained and seems to have been reported internationally
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: snd}}fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SUSTAINED||WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails at least tWO parts of ;  and .This was actually pretty obvious when this article was first created
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:SENSATIONAL)