Deletion of List of defensive gun use incidents

Comment: WP:INDISCRIMINATE does not apply. In the worst case, it should be rewritten as Defensive gun use. AFD is 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTCLEANUP)

Comment: This list meets list notability criteria  as there is ample coverage of Defensive Gun Use Incidents discussed as a group in reliable sources.  For example this one: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1615397
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL)

Comment: as indiscriminate, , and against our |list selection criteria which makes it completely unmaintainable. There are ten qualifying incidents in one month alone. It would be like having a "List of concerts in Ohio", or "List of political speeches": you would have a list with literally thousands of entries, perhaps even millions. The creator of the article is using a false equivalence to make his point. Yes, we have articles listing gun attacks, but they focus on a specific higher class of incident (like rampages), not every single gun murder committed in the United States of America. His argument also reeks of a , as the article is being used as an agenda to correct a perceived imbalance in the gun debate. The lack of articles about defensive gun use is duly noted, but it does not justify creating a completely unencyclopedic list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:ORIGINALSYN||WP:LSC||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: Nothing indiscriminate about it-- lists three sorts of indiscriminate info, and "news stories on one topic" isn't one of them.  The nom is also clearly wrong in that there is a specific criteria for list inclusion: defensive use of firearms reported in reliable sources.  The other Delete !voters are unconvincing, although I don't disagree with Ubelowme's rename suggestion.  The notion that "Defensive" or "incident" are sufficiently ill-defined that deletion is the preferred outcome is uncompelling.  The GNG is met, the sources appear clearly adequate, and no delete !voter has put forth any policy-based reason that this list article is unsuitable or couldn't be fixed by regular editing per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO||WP:ATD)