Deletion of Allie X (2nd nomination)

Comment: significant coverage indicated by the given sources. Previous AfD on this article confirmed notability, and |it is not temporary
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: per  and NinjaRobotPirate's sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: This article subject fails the notability test because she herself is not notable since '''she''' does not have significant coverage across numerous  that wikipedia considers reliable. see:  So she fails . Perhaps a single song that charted may be notable, but notability is not conferred on her, sort of like a child does not inherit notability from a parent. Also almost half of the sources presently in the article are from "interviews" connected with unreliable sources such as online companies that do not provide editoral oversight. Combining unreliable sources with s taken by non-oversighted companies makes the sourcing dubious at best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:VERIFIABLE||WP:GNG||WP:INTERVIEWS)

Comment: meets  #2 by having a top 100 ''Billboard'' hit. (edit: I just checked AfD #1 to see I !voted on exactly the same criteria. ''Plus ca change
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSBIO)

Comment: The article has 13 references, at least some of which are to |reliable sources.  One of her singles is reliably sourced to having a chart number, which makes it notable in itself.  If her single is notable, then why does the submitter keep insisting that she is not notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)