Deletion of Priesthill (Zion) Methodist

Comment: This is a substantial article, whose content ought to be retained in WP by some means.  I do not find it confusing: it gives a coherent hisotry of the church, and I hope that some one will remove that tag.  I have just wikified the article a bit and provided some more links (I hope correct ones).  I believe the right solution for NN churches is usually to marge them to the town or village where they are.  However, this is too substantial an article for that.  While it is not well referenced, I have little dount that there are sources that mean that it meets the |verifiability standard.  In this case, merging it to the article on Lisburn would gravely unbalance that article.  I have added this church to its churches section (which was merely a link farm list).  It mgith have eben amalgamated with the Methodist Circuit (or district) of which it is part, but we do not appear to have articles on Methodist circuits or districts.  However that is a solution adopted for primary schools in some countries (with school boards).  For want of a suitable merge target, I say '''keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)