Deletion of Flt. Lt. Jeff Clarson D.F.C.

Comment: to No. 186 Squadron RAF. Clearly not notable to have a biography article, but Gnangarra makes a good case for a merge. Unfortunately, the article is unreferenced and you can't merge unreferenced content per . Therefore, as redirects are cheap, I think it's the best option
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Unreferenced, lacks coverage, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: there are no citations to reliable sources so this information is not verifiable (although http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/honour_roll/search.cfm?aus_award_id=1070621&search_type=advanced&showInd=true this confirms the award). Beyond that, per , the DFC is not considered to confer notability by itself within the Military history project. As such, the subject needs to be able to establish notability through being listed in multiple reliable sources (i.e. "significant coverage" per the ). I have not been able to find such coverage (I found http://www.aussieairliners.org/crewlists/ana.html this, http://www.google.com.au/#q=Jeff%20Clarson%20DFC&hl=en&prmd=ivnso&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&tab=wp&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=50d8517db56afa1a&biw=1280&bih=583 this and http://collection.cairnsregionalgallery.com.au/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=494 this, which basically amount to passing mentions), and as such while I'm sure that this man deserves respect, unfortunately it does not seem that he is notable in terms of warranting a biographical article on Wikipedia. I would be more than happy to be proved wrong. Regards
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: fails . Subject also appears to lack "signficant coverage" in |reliable sources and is therefore likely to be not notable under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:RS||WP:GNG)