Deletion of Harry, A History

Comment: Since you only remarked "Non-notable", perhaps I should just leave my remarks at this: notable. However, thank you for pointing out the fact that there are ''at least'' 58 articles covering the book, more than enough to serve for "multiple published works." Millions of additional articles? Come on. But even if we had to, if they all met , we could. And yes, being on a New York Times best-seller list ''is'', in fact, indicative of notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BK)

Comment: Neither of you mentioned this was on the New York Times Bestseller List which is a pretty good indication that a book is notable and if the site for the book (http://www.harryahistory.com/aboutthebook.html) can be believed, Kirkus Reviews (highly regarded review magazine and website in the literary world) and The Scotsman have also reviewed the book. That makes it at least 4 reliable sources about the book, not counting the trivial mention about the content already included -- thus meeting 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)