Deletion of Bir Narayan Chaudhary

Comment: per . Another longevitycruft article that presents farfetched accounts of extreme old age with minimal skepticism. Wikipedia should not be uncritically reporting obvious falsehoods
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: There are sufficient reliable sources to satisfy . Extraordinary claims require extraordinary sourcing, but the article is not about the claim per se
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This topic passes  as it stands, with 2 pieces of substantive coverage  in |reliable sources(India Todayhttps://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/neighbours/story/19961015-being-the-oldest-ever-is-a-record-bir-narayan-chaudhary-neither-wants-nor-understands-833910-1996-10-15 and APhttps://apnews.com/b1e8516a8c8c7c060b01332edfb29168), plus a 103-word obithttp://articles.latimes.com/1998/apr/24/news/mn-42638 in the LA Times (also a reliable source).  As usual, the nominator
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS)

Comment: This article fails , , and . The article says very little about this obvious fraudster. He scammed some media coverage and honors from a king, but the article doesn't say much else about him. Maybe deserves a mention at Longevity myths, but nothing more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOPAGE)