Deletion of List of ...For Dummies books

Comment: the list is already maintained by the publishers.  It's not a copyright violation, but it's not encyclopaedic;  a collection of indiscriminate information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: we are |not an indiscriminate gathering of information. The books don't even have articles yet, signaling that this list isn't needed. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: of course!  Wikipedia is not a mirror of the publisher's catalogue, or an indiscriminate collection of information.  Also, #Undue weight|UW - few if any other publishers or series have an entire cataloigue mirrored on Wikipedia, nor should they.  There are new titles coming out all the time, and no more than a tiny fraction of those listed have articles.  Anybody who wants the list of Dummies books can get it trivially easily from dummies.com or Wiley's website, authoritative and up-to-date sources, with no more effort and with considerably more useful results since they will be able to click through and read a synopsis.  Honestly, there is no encyclopaedic content here at all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: don't understand the purpose of the list. Why would anyone need a list of this type of series? 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)