Deletion of Action World Model

Comment: to Non-standard cosmology, surely.The key point here is that |notability does '''not''' require us to delete content completely.  What it tells us is that non-notable topics shouldn't have their own articles.There's a tension between  and  that occurs when a subject is |verifiable but not notable, which we can only resolve by merging the disputed content to a parent article.  Also, it doesn't matter whether this model is ''true''.  What matters is whether it's ''sourced''.  (By analogy, Wikipedia quite rightly has an article on Bigfoot).In this case, I would recommend a heavy trim when the merge is implemented; I feel it merits a paragraph or so
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:PRESERVE||WP:V)

Comment: NawlinWiki has it right. |Non-notable, screams of original research, only one source. Google doesn't turn up anything besides this article and an ad for "Santa's Action World Model
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per |notability and |fringe theory concerns
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:FRINGE)