Deletion of Flumph

Comment: or failing that '''merge''' and redirect. That secondary sources are "listicles" does not mean that the do not count. As the quote shows, the flumph is more than just mentioned - though, granted, the treatment is not exactly long. What the secondary sources also say, including the one by David M. Ewalt|Ewalt, which is not a listicle, is that the flumph is considered quite special within the D&D game by the authors. If these together are not considered to fulfill , a merge is still preferable to complete deletion, because bringing this special case properly based on secondary sources out can improve an article like Monsters in Dungeons & Dragons
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)