Deletion of Patrick M. Novack

Comment: I'm returning my position to delete after reading the discussion regarding the medals being insufficient to sustain notability own their own. Without that, the burden of significant coverage in secondary sources has not be met, per . See my other comments above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Nationally the Silver Star is either 7th or 11th, but definitely not 3rd.http://www.homeofheroes.com/medals/1_precedence.html. Depends on if y the 4 flavors of Distinguished Service Medal are considered the same award or not. Better url for #4. http://www.abcnewspapers.com/2004/coonrapids/april/15vacancy.html Brief mention http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=mn&vol=appunpub\9707\1631&invol=1 Few more returns http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Pat+Novack%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1985&as_hdate=1989&lnav=hist7 http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Pat+Novack%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1990&as_hdate=1994&lnav=hist8. None of those seem particularly notable. He was accomplished, and seems like a great guy, but I don't think the article passes 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The author has put a lot of effort into this biography, which is a tribute page to his father. Novack's service as a veteran and a police officer does not demonstrate the notability required for an article in Wikipedia (). Community service and political activity are admirable but not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Hairhorn is correct, "locally well-known" doesn't cut it.  Wikipedia has specific criteria for inclusion at  and there is not significant in-depth coverage in reliable sources.   I don't believe that his military medals qualify under  but I will wait until others weigh in on this specific issue before giving an opinion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)