Deletion of Kenneth McLaren

Comment: as a |coatrack article for Robert Baden-Powell.  There's nothing of any real significance indicating why it should be merged, either.  The editor who created this article made it abundantly clear that it was to further an agenda {claiming he was a "significant other" to Baden-Powell with no evidence and "there is more to unearth on him" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kenneth_McLaren&diff=341587962&oldid=341586207).  He was also known to misrepresent sources.  If someone still feels McLaren is notable enough for an article, let them recreate the article from scratch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COAT)

Comment: Falls far short of independent notability, in particular, fails all aspects of .  The sources have nothing more than trivial passing mentions of McLaren in context of  Baden-Powell and his position with the Scouts (that also was conferred by Baden-Powell), and nothing about any independent actions or accomplishments. And his name is included on some long lists of military-related names and dates. None of that is sufficient for an article per WP:N and WP:V
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I agree with "minor" and I agree that he was significant to someone that was notable.  But notability is not inherited.  Here's the test.  Let's pretend that there was no evidence at all that McLaren ever had met Baden-Powell.  For what would he be notable?  If the entire claim to notability is that he possibly had a relationship with a notable character then he clearly doesn't meet 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: He seems notable to me, even if only of minor notability.  If there are  issues, they can be dealt with by removing offending text.  The article appears to a well-sourced biography.  It is hardly appropriate to merge one person inot another
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: per Bduke. While probably notable mostly because of his relationship to Baden-Powell, this is irrelevant regarding  (meaning that, if sources talk of ''him'', as it seems, he is not simply presumed notable by association as the nom seems to imply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)