Deletion of Cars 2 (2nd nomination)

Comment: and some |salt would be nice too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT)

Comment: 100% |original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Doesn't meet  or #CRYSTAL; SALT as appropriate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFF||WP:NOT)

Comment: Per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: no official word, nothing on IMDB, nothing from Pixar. Classic case of . All i've found is http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/4783041.stm a pretty amusing article on the BBC about an illegal street vendor selling "Cars" as "Cars 2" the day "Cars" came out in theaters. Due to the amount of recreations of this article i suggest |a little salt on this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:SALT)

Comment: as a clear case of |crystal balling.  If coverage of such a sequel in development does arise, it should belong on the first film article before establishing its own article upon entry of production, per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:NFF)