Deletion of Waldo Vieira

Comment: I found one http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-132354434.html book review in a fringe journal, but I don't think that's enough for . And per  and , we need mainstream sources about him, not just fringe ones, to generate appropriately neutral coverage of the fact that his beliefs are fringe ones, and I don't see any of those
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:FRINGE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: Failure of  also some concerns about  through attempt to use Vieira to slip in "projectology" as a "nascent science
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:FRINGE)

Comment: It took a lot of digging to find the review because the Journal of Parapsychology appears to be defunct - having not published {{strikethrough|since 2009 and having no web presence at all since 2012}} a Fall 2013 edition. I did find it here: http://www.biomedsearch.com/article/Projectiology-Panorama-Experiences-Consciousness-Outside/132354434.html and honestly, even from the in-universe perspective the fact is that the reviewer says: '''it is not the perception of this reader that this work is the quintessential guide to lucid projection'''. If what we have is a weakly-warm review in a single defunct parapsychology journal and a pay-for-space listing in a who's who book that is nowhere near the level of notability required for 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Possible failure to meet  criteria Wikipedia:AUTHOR#Additional_criteria|is '''not''' conclusive proof that a subject should not be included. Pass  and Wikipedia:Notability criteria: not trivial multiple independent sources, and more possible forthcoming sources in portuguese
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BASIC)

Comment: Fails #Notability. No reliable sources providing any sort of analysis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)