Deletion of Public plans for energy efficient refurbishment

Comment: Seems like a , almost an , an awkward umbrella term for an energy-conservation POV, with a prime problem being that when searching for the ungainly article title, ''Public plans for energy efficient refurbishment'', in a browser bar, it is hard to find with that exact sequence of words in any |reliable sources. So, the article creator has grabbed disparate information, and the |original research is that all of these different activities, in different countries, all belong under the same umbrella under this "refurbishment" idea. Looking over the article, my eyes blur; what is it about? It seems to delve into detailed aspects of the subject (as if the reader ''already'' agreed with the writer that energy conservation measures by agencies was a ''good thing'', a given), like the reader has stumbled into a government-sponsored energy funding meeting, and has ''no clue'' what is going on. The article needs context, distance, a neutral perspective to approach the subject objectively. If the article can be trimmed down, refocused possibly, it might be worthwhile but at this point it seems easier to delete it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTHESIS||WP:ESSAY||WP:RS||WP:OR)