Deletion of Scott Disick (4th nomination)

Comment: per #G4. Per nom and above editor deleted/redirected, then protect it. Nothing has changed in the last 10 months since we last had this discussion. Being Kourtney Kardashian's boyfriend is not sufficient to establish notability. Sources are all related to that relationship. |Notability is not inherited
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Meets criteria of ntertainer and easily passes . This actor's character may be unpopular with many people, but for over eight years he has persisted as a regular television personality. In addition to his ''acting'' role  on Keeping Up with the Kardashians since 2007, he has also become a staple for  TMZ, E!, People (magazine), Star (magazine), Us Weekly and other gossip magazines, and in the process has (like it or not) become a figure in pop culture.  His  popularity with viewers has seen him placed on numerous TV shows including Punk'd, Fashion Police and Miss Universe 2012 (as a judge no less). As a Model (people)|model (without Kim) he has appeared on the cover of the May 2011 issue of http://icydk.com/2011/03/22/scott-disick-graces-the-cover-of-mens-fitness/ Men's Fitness; and several years ago (before his reality TV personality took off) he was the cover model for the Heartland (novel series) by Lauren Brooke, see story at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2263623/Scott-Disicks-bizarre-modeling-past-unveiled.html dailymail.co.uk
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:E||WP:GNG)

Comment: Still a BLP nightmare and writing that's definitely not even trying to make a case for  (apparently he just sat in his room doing nothing for 22 years until he went to Mexico in 2005; if you're trying to go for a keep, the  is on the article creator to make a case for the subject's whole life for notability) and everything here is easily summed up in Kourtney's article. In fact with Caitlyn Jenner, this subject's claim to notability has actually '''deteriorated''' in the last few months; restore the redirect and salt it. Also, if anyone would like to do something about the connected disaster of an article On-again, off-again relationship, I would definitely support that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BURDEN)