Deletion of Albemarle Gallery

Comment: Unfortunately, this is a situation I have encountered again and again in Wikipedia. With art galleries it is extremely difficult to establish notability. Most reliable sources are about the individual exhibitions, or invited speakers, or curators, not the space itself. Unless there are sources that are about the space itself, it's really difficult to pass . I've tried repeatedly to save articles about art spaces and in most cases failed. Sure, developing notability criteria for art spaces would be wonderful, if someone could argue persuasively that a long-standing institution, with notable exhibitions can bypass  because of some sort of accumulated notability (if notable artists and notable curators and notable exhibitions are exhibiting and curating and taking place within a space, consistently), then we can revisit this. As it stands, we do not have the requirement flexibility to establish this as notable at this time. If more sources turn up ''about the space itself'' that satisfy  I would immediately change my !vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:GNG)

Comment: If you want to create notability criteria for art galleries, sure, go for it, and then ''gain a consensus that they're valid.''  But a symbiotic argument cuts no ice: |notability still isn't inherited.  Me, I think such an argument is like "Boohoo, there aren't any notability criteria for ice cream stands, so I can't write an article on my favorite corner malt shop" but that's just me.  As far as the notability criteria ''already in place'', the subject fails, however much of an "institution" it allegedly is. ''' ''Nha Trang
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED)

Comment: Patently fails |GNG. Note to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)