Deletion of Dafin F. Muresanu

Comment: He may be notable, but it is difficult to tell with all the apparent puffery here. For instance, I believe that none of the long list of memberships in societies count for much; they belong in a cv, not in an encyclopedia article. In particular becoming a member (not fellow) of AAAS is something anyone who cares to subscribe to ''Science'' does. Being a Fellow of ANA seems superficially to be more promising, but http://myana.org/membership their membership requirements make it clear that this level of membership is open to all tenured faculty; that is, it is not the highly selective honor considered by #C3
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: but fix up. I agree with the above comment that too much of what is here is CV material. Also, most of the assertions about positions and membership are as yet unsourced. I cleaned up a few refs and added some 'cite needed' notes. The citations need to be brought more into line with  (e.g. include dates and full article titles), not just for pedantic purposes but because it makes it easier to tell what is being cited. I also recommend leaving the first paragraph as the introductory material, and creating a section immediately after with a heading like "Professional activity". Right now the intro is too long, and the remainder of the article is only lists. It'll look much better with a shorter intro and more text. Of the lists, I would leave only the major awards (although each needs a citation), and perhaps a selected list of books (but not all). At that point it should look like a good WP article for an academic. (I'll start the talk page with these suggestions
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: My feeling is that he's probably notable, but it's hard to tell. Perhaps  #C6 for  President of the Romanian Society of Neurology. He's a prolific author, but only one paper with 100 cites in GS and cites go down rapidly from there. The scientific achievements are hard for a lay person to decipher. I have no idea how significant they are. The article should say. I agree that the CV stuff should be trimmed drastically. At least move the awards and  memberships out of the lead. The "Information related to scientific activity" section should be rewritten as a text paragraph, which could replace a lot of the CV material. –&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)