Deletion of Jordan Jansen (2nd nomination)

Comment: would appear to meet  criteria #1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: If you look at , having "any big hits" is not the only criteria. He would pass #1 simply on the fact that he is the "subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself." References including http://www.news.com.au/technology/jordan-jansen-leads-the-next-generation-of-aussie-justin-biebers/story-e6frfrnr-1226579457646 Courier Mail, http://hollywoodlife.com/2010/05/26/jordan-jansen-justin-bieber-greyson-chance-ellen-youtube-australia/ Hollywood Life (snippet, but still all about him), and Dolly (magazine)| Dolly Magazine (appears on his website so I have not verified it) all appear to be the "multiple" needed. Finally, I am not sure what would qualify as "big hits" as he has released numerous songs, many of which are listed in sources such as Reverb Nation and other music sites. I would suggest toning down the promotion a little, but the article would qualify
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: WP:IDONTLIKEIT|I don't like this kind of music and am extremely adverse to Justin Bieber, but it looks like Jordan |makes the grade
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)