Deletion of The McKinnon Worker

Comment: Even in the cleaned up version, it's still a load of tottenham. A steaming pile of hotspur. One is not supposed to |bite the newbies, but people who show up with attitudes like we see above deserve a good chomping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers (WP:BITE)

Comment: In the creator's own tirade he mentions that this is being used as |advertising for the site and the fact that a |single purpose account invovled with the newsletter created this makes it a |conflict of interest. Also that ISP above also http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_McKinnon_Worker&diff=prev&oldid=207819987| blanked this AfD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT||WP:SPA||WP:COI)

Comment: A sterling case of  as well as .  No, in fact, no one is going to want to see this so-called "information
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BULLSHIT||WP:NFT)

Comment: although the article doesn't fit any |speedy criteria, it does fail , , and . It also doesn't assert any notability through references or third-party citations for notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion (WP:CSD||WP:NPOV||WP:N||WP:COI)