Deletion of Chicago Postcard Museum

Comment: and '''speedy close per '''. There's obviously nothing to save here. I honestly don't understand why admins leave these obvious snowballs open so long that editors get backed into a corner, get emotional and start flinging |personal attacks because they aren't getting their way. What I don't get about ''this'' discussion is ''both'' sides want to delete the article, but {{ul|Neil Gale}} is ''still'' attacking everyone. Why hasn't this user been blocked yet? Shut it down, guys
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:NPA)

Comment: Again, please |assume good faith and remember that |there is no agenda
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:TINC)

Comment: Sources listed so far don't provide adequately significant "reliable source" coverage to meet the notability guidelines at  and . In addition to the above linked sources, I also found a one-paragraph description in http://www.antiquetrader.com/antiques/collectibles/whats_in_the_mail_postage-pizza-politics ''Antique Trader'', and a one-sentence critique on http://forgottenchicago.com/columns/postcards/historic-postcards-part-one-storefronts/ ''Forgotten Chicago''. I did not listen to the radio interviews, as
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB)

Comment: per  and per Mendaliv's in-depth analysys of the level of sourcing.  Very poor Alexa rank (9,370,939!) seals the issue for me.  Even the owner wants the article gone
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)