Deletion of Ron Delezio

Comment: Father of the Year" seems like a pretty marginal award, and I don't think it makes him ''very'' notable, but I think it makes him notable ''enough'' to pass, and the article has that all-important feature: sources!  Meets , , and , even if it's just barely on that last.  (And no, I don't think he's only known because of his daughter--it actually looks like it's the other way around.  I would probably vote to delete an article on her
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:BIO)

Comment: well sourced, encyclopaedic biography article that passes  - why are we even discussing this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Even if the claim that he was named father of the year was sourced, that alone would not meet . Likewise, being on the periphery of someone more famous does not allowing piggybacking onto that fame, even if the daughter has been the subject of multiple, not-trivial treatment in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)