Deletion of Hattiesburg plane crash

Comment: since the FAA and NTSB are investigating.  Still holding to this being  since we don't know if this could have a lasting impact.  All it takes is to say the plane had a malfunction, and most likely, it would have a lasting impact
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: All aviation accidents are routinely investigated by the NTSB and a report completed. The fact that an investigation is being done does not confer any notability at all. See . Guessing that this might result in some lasting regulatory or other lasting changes would be  as well as highly unlikely
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:RUNOFTHEMILL||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: a routine light aircraft crash, tragic, but one of many thousands globally each year. No notable people involved, no lasting effects, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per . Incident lacks "enduring historical significance" and "significant lasting effect". Per #4, (bold in original, underline is mine): {{tq|Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually '''not notable''' unless something further gives them additional enduring significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT)

Comment: just a comment for now...not a personal attack, but the Afd started by {{u|WilliamJE}} and the PROD done by {{u|Carguychris}} are easily a violation of .  The afd is more of how you preceive the policy, but for the record, the PROD was placed on less than 90 minutes after creation.  I will actually assess notability after 24 hours, aka tomorrow, but for now, I believe this violates that policy and anyone who assesses the notability (Keep or delete !votes) also is violating it.  Just wait 24 hours to see how it plays out
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:RAPID)

Comment: per nom, this crash is  and merely illustrates how non-notable air crashes garner gratuitous press coverage, particularly when there's fire, property damage and casualties on the ground—"if it bleeds, it leads
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:ROTM)

Comment: that is why we have  to cover that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per  and lacking in enduring historical significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: this is true of myriad non-notable events and is the reason why  exists. Yes, the event could eventually qualify for notability under , but let's cross that bridge when we come to it
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCRYSTAL||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE)

Comment: This has all the makings of a  and  story
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL||WP:NOTNEWS)