Deletion of 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (2nd nomination)

Comment: meets  and , a number of reviews available online including by https://www.theguardian.com/books/2006/feb/26/classics.features The Guardian, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/23/books/23read.html The New York Times, and http://www.theage.com.au/news/book-reviews/1001-books-you-must-read-before-you-die/2006/04/21/1145344265758.html The Age, i note that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die|the first afd was deemed keep with a large majority of editors backing keep with an editor citing the above reviews, would like to direct the nominator to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG||WP:NOTTEMPORARY)

Comment: Piling here, I see, but wanted to thank Coolabahapple for doing what everyone above should have done. Save the screed and show the sources: three dedicated reviews from major publications is enough to write a dedicated article on the subject. Deletion should have always been |out of the question since the title makes for a fine redirect to the author's page. It wouldn't be so bad to cover it there Wikipedia:Summary style|summary style anyway. File:Eye close font awesome.svg|14px|link=user:czar/watching|I am no longer watching this pageping if you'd like a response&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)