Deletion of Sands Fish

Comment: or '''draftifty'''.  No sign whatsoever of  or GNG, and no evidence of .  This points towards delete.  The best argument for draftifying is that searching for the name of the subject is difficult, so it is plausible that we've missed some reviews (and should give the article originator time to find them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:NARTIST)

Comment: Whilst I'm not wholly opposed to draftifying, I'm not convinced based on the evidence so far that there will be enough substance to establish notability any time soon, and I don't see why this should sit in drafts indefinitely waiting for Mr Fish to one day 'maybe possibly' become notable. (I for one also don't see why student projects should be assessed for notability etc. more leniently than other articles, sympathetic as I otherwise am to student projects, in principle.) As it stands, fails  / 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO)