Deletion of Kevin Eggan

Comment: per JayHenry. Clearly meets the primary standard given in , along with various standards in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:PROF)

Comment: multiple reliable sources have written about him.  That meets the criteria for notability regardless of any details for academics in 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He published scientific papers and was recognized by multiple organizations for his work, including mainstream press (Forbes for example). The article reads a bit like as if somebody with  was writing it, which warrants a clean-up, but notability is IMO established
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: it's not entirely clear to me what part of  those arguing for delete believe is being violated.  He's definitely won a notable award, he and his research have both been the primary subject of articles from independent reliable sources (the associated press article is primarily about Eggan, Forbes is primarily about his research published in Science
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)