Deletion of List of slang names for poker hands (2nd nomination)

Comment: this is inappropriate. While there is no formal requirement that a certain amount of time pass following a no consensus close, it is bad form to renominate the following day. If you disagree with the close and there is a policy reason behind your disagreement, try to work it out with the closing admin and then take it to  if you still disagree. However, if this ends up at DRV I'm likely to support the closing admin's close
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: contrary to the nomination, there was, indeed, no "strong consensus for deletion".  In fact, it was specifically closed as "no consensus", and frankly, I can see why.  My !vote stands, and I'm tempted to |be bold and close this as I schlep it over to DRV
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Be bold (WP:BOLD)

Comment: It's in black and white. Wikipedia is  a slang dictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Shouldn't this be at  instead? (Rhetorical) Cheers
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: Looking at the original AFD, while there may have been a slight majority, it does not look like a consensus per . I think the admin acted correctly in this case. I don't have a problem with the re-list, but let's |assume good faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Consensus (WP:CONSENSUS||WP:AGF)