Deletion of Aurora Snow

Comment: throwing out the Daily Beast articles that's written by her, she still passes the GNG. The Daily Dot article includes a biographical paragraph about her in the journalist's voice prefacing the interview. MSN Australia and The Independent wrote about Snow and one of her articles here. https://web.archive.org/web/20140206141624/http://health.ninemsn.com.au/family/digestive/8731943/porn-stars-touching-letter-to-her-unborn-sonhttps://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/what-its-like-to-be-an-adult-film-actress-and-a-mother-a7018186.html. Actually her articles are frequently cited by reliable sources satisfying .https://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/porn-star-james-deen-refutes-sex-assault-allegations-article-1.2458596https://www.laweekly.com/aurora-snow-rare-working-porn-star-bravely-says-yes-to-l-a-county-condom-measure/https://laist.com/2012/10/19/aurora_snow.phphttps://newsone.com/2000702/aurora-snow-sasha-grey-porn-stars-have-morals-too/https://www.businessinsider.com/interracial-sex-is-still-taboo-in-porn-2013-3/lightbox?r=AU&IR=Thttps://www.mercurynews.com/2018/04/10/stormy-daniels-says-porn-companies-not-her-are-raking-in-money-from-her-trump-fight/https://theweek.com/articles/454769/how-porn-industry-putting-performers--finances--risk
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:JOURNALIST)

Comment: I’m normally pretty sceptical of porn articles because they send to fall victim to link spam from adult industry blogs (many of which are unreliable or are just interviews), this one does seem to fit within the GNG. The subject is covered in mainstream publications like the New York Times and the Daily Beast and many of these sources cover her in significant levels of detail. This might be the rare porn star that has solid coverage from 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)