Deletion of Kelly Fraasch

Comment: as per above. My media sweeps did not find sufficient evidence to meet the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per .  If she were a city councillor of Pittsburgh, a large and storied city, perhaps there would be an argument to keep.  As it is, she's not yet notable.  Perhaps when she gets elected to Congress or the State assembly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: Municipal councillors are not deemed to pass  except in major, internationally famous global city|global cities — absent that, you have to be able to source them over  for some ''other'' reason ''beyond'' the mere fact of being a municipal councillor. But this makes no other claim that would get her over another Wikipedia inclusion bar — and it relies on minimal sourcing, with #1 being her own profile on her own employer's website (an invalid |primary source) and the rest simply namechecking her ''existence'' in conjunction with exclusively ''local'' coverage of a social issue (and thus failing to demonstrate that she's ''nationally'' or ''internationally'' recognized for that work.) In addition, there's a probable  here if you check the creator's username — while that isn't technically a deletion rationale in and of itself, it confirms that the intent here had more to do with public relations than with Wikipedia's inclusion standards for politicians
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG||WP:PRIMARYSOURCES||WP:COI)

Comment: one of a number of local councillors for a town of 33,000 people hardly bodes well. Looking around, she gets some routine coverage in the local newspaper for an organisation she set up and that's it. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)