Deletion of Jessica Wilson

Comment: per .  In any case, she's accomplished more than have of academics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE)

Comment: Meets  #5 - distinguished professor at a major university.  Morever, there are more sources in journals I don't currently have access to but intend to add eventually.  But still, holding a distinguished professor appointment at a major university is enough to keep, since academic primary sources can be assumed to be reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: The Lebowitz Prize is a pretty big deal in the philosophical world, with $30K check and sources http://philosophy.rutgers.edu/news here and http://www.keyreporter.org/PbkNews/PbkNews/Details/1104.html here to establish that; it is for "celebrated philosophers for their excellence in thought". While Wilson doesn't get much news coverage, and it is hard to get secondary sources describing what her impact is, in the philosophical world (why my vote is a "weak keep") and while much of this work in metaphysics is highly technical and abstruse and almost might be, shall we say, doomed intellectually to be dull and unproductive, still, it is an important subject (in my view). But there aren't many references to support a . Still, she's clearly a smart cookie, although I'd bet a cold beer that her understanding of how to square 'free will' with determinism is not as good as my understanding -- not her fault, shall I say, since she was not schooled in the Wikipedia|best university in the world as I have been and continue to study. Her https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=9wGi3KwAAAAJ&hl=en Google scholar citations number 511, her h-index is strong at 11, the i10 index respectable at 12. That said, the article should be trimmed way back; if it stays, I'll try, so closing admin write something on my talk page if the article stays
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)