Deletion of NUCCA

Comment: Appears to fail - not subject of significant, reliable, independent coverage. Special:Contributions/PeterTheFourth|PeterTheFourth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  a quick news search for "National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association" reveals at least a half dozen features by RS publishers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CONTN)

Comment: Blatent....quackery", "No evidence of efficacy", and "fringe" (I often hear that one) are not legitimate arguments. Notability is the only thing necessary, and fringe sources can be used to document such notability, per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:PARITY)

Comment: Poorly sourced, fails .  Reads a little like a spammy advert for the procedure
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)