Deletion of Tarsnap

Comment: spaced ndash}} Meets  per http://www.linuxjournaldigital.com/linuxjournal/201208?pg=104#pg105, http://www.scmagazine.com.au/News/301385,auscert2012-freebsd-talks-amateur-bug-hunting.aspx. Also, per , |topic notability is based upon the ''availability'' of |significant coverage in reliable sources, rather than whether or not sources are present in articles. See also   and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NRVE||WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:IMPERFECT||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: The owner of the software is commenting here. That's fine but please keep  in mind. People with a direct relationship to the subject of an article are not impartial. Also, in response to Lexein, it isn't contingent upon a nonminator to "prove there are no reliable sources", that's completely backward. It's contingent upon those writing the article, you know, the redlinked SPI account who wrote this one, to establish notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)