Deletion of Lonelygirl15

Comment: she still doesn't meet  guidelines though... that is the issue here.  The new external links section is all non-|reliable sources and I'd say most of it (like her MySpace) should removed as self-promotional links that add nothing to an encyclopedic article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: per everyone and close up this AfD per . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: you can rewrite it if this article survives AfD, but it doesn't matter.  It's not a formatting or style issue here, it is the fact that she meets none of the  guidelines.  A rewrite won't change that unless you are aware of |reliable sources and non-trivial coverage that those opining keep are failing to mention
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)

Comment: may have been on the front page but the newspaper website report http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?query=Lonelygirl15&srchst=nyt no hits. Does not seem to pass any of the  or  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:BIO)

Comment: per nom. Not-notable and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: All the pieces are brief blurbs or blogs (which are not |reliable sources in my book).  I would call them all "trivial" coverage or coverage from non-reliable sources.  I still don't see evidence of multiple non-trivial mention in reliable sources and that is the problem here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)