Deletion of Heather Ratnage Black

Comment: The Keep arguments aren't merely threadbare, they bear little resemblance to any notability guideline.  Given Northamerica1000's experience at AfD, his comments border on bad faith, since he himself does not seem to have examined the sources presented.  One of them comes from the RAF itself - and thus isn't an independent sources satisfying the GNG - and the other comes from the website of a weekly newspaper of a town of six thousand, which he knows well is not of the sort generally considered to satisfy  ... even if it discussed the subject in the "significant detail" the GNG requires, which a 95-word filler does not.The other Keep proponent seems confused over what the relevant guidelines require.  The GNG does not require multiple sources; it requires multiple citations from |reliable, published, independent sources which discuss the subject in significant detail, which they do and are not.  As far as the subject's putative accomplishments in winter sports - an assertion for which Ego White Tray has provided no evidence in this past week - failing the GNG,  generally support the notability of athletes competing at the Olympics or at the world championships in their respective sports.  The RAF 2008 Bobsleigh, Luge and Skeleton Inter-Service Championships does not remotely cut it.A Google search turns up little beyond this article.  A G-News search turns up zilch.  She has not competed in national or international competition in her sport. There is no valid ground to retain this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: spaced ndash}} This deletion nomination is unconvincing and has false aspects to it. The nomination states that no references exist in the article, but there was one in place ''prior'' to the nomination (it's still there). Seems to be an instance of not even considering source searching per  prior to commencing the nomination, to the point of not even checking sources already in the article. Let's not delete articles based upon false premises as a rationale for deletion. Better yet, perhaps at least consider the idea of |improving the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BOLD)

Comment: Although online reliable sources have not been found, the web pages I dug up do support the fact that Ratnage Black competed in Skeleton in World Cups.  The World Cups is the top level circuit and thus meets .  Offline sources are acceptable, and likely exists
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSPORT)