Deletion of Debbie Rowe

Comment: An enyclopdic and well sourced article that meets .  Her prior relationship with the deceased musician made it easier, yes... but the coverage meets the inclusion criteria and is now her own
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Notability is not inherited, and giving birth to two children allegedly fathered by a celebrity is not sufficient to justify an encyclopedia article. Absent the giving birth and the marriage, she would definitely not have an article, Appropriate to mention her in an article about Jackson, since that its the basis of any press coverage. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: largely for the reasons given by the nomination.  I was actually reviewing this myself, and my sources search to date yields nothing that isn't related simply to the fame of Michael Jackson - the quantity is not in doubt, but the quality to satisfy the non-trivial coverage required of  and  is.  That said, a redirect to Michael Jackson (or an appropriate subsection of the same) would seem appropriate, since the pertinent information exists there already
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: or '''merge to Michael Jackson''' because |Notability is not inherited and #Presumption in favor of privacy|to protect Rowe's privacy. In these cases we should be really careful with Wikipedia:Libel because it's 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:BLP||WP:BLP)