Deletion of Jae Bryson

Comment: only one book published. Does not meet threshold of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: per Frank. Notability not established; article lists one book he wrote, one he contributed to. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: notability not established. Article seems to plainly be a |vanity piece (which is ironic via the comment regarding the "arrogant and pedantic :Image:Don't abbreviate as Wiki (English version).png|Wiki-contributors" comment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:VANITY)

Comment: notability is not established, and while the number of Ghits is low, the number of GNews archive hits is http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Jae+Bryson%22&um=1 way lower at 14. To me, that is more an indicator of lack of notability. Lack of Google hits doesn't deny notability, although it often correlates; but if there are few or no GNews hits, it indicates that there are few or no articles in independent, reliable sources that constitute coverage of the topic or individual. Even if there were tens of thousands of hits in Google, the real scarcity of independent hits in news archives shows lack of suitability. Also, only http://books.google.com/books?ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Jae%20Bryson%22&um=1&sa=N&tab=np four hits in GBooks, and only one of them is a book written by Bryson. (Not intending to use a reverse- point, but we did ''speedy'' the article for Chuck Hustmyre http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Chuck+Hustmyre just a few months ago and he has authored http://books.google.com/books?q=+inauthor:%22Chuck+Hustmyre%22&lr=&source=gbs_authrefine_t at least five books
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)

Comment: Appears to fail  and  due to a lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. The book which was "as told to" him by the two football players, got several reviews, but probably not enough notability for its own article. Bryson himself got a bit of coverage in the Minneapolis/St Paul papers as publisher of his local "One Nation" newspaper
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: I don't care about the Google hits, but I can't see the evidence of notability we normally seek: multiple non-trivial references in reliable sources. In the absence of this |verification, deletion is the only option
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: doesn't meet notability criteria, also written by subject (see 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)