Deletion of Marketing resource management

Comment: The article as now stands following improvement is rightfully sourced and sustained coverage and coverage in depth sates  in terms of retention.  That is not so say article isn't free of issues and in need of content improvement but those are not AfD matters per .  I'd be highly concerned about a redirect/merge given the improvements to this article to the current Market operations management Marketing operations management (which I removed 2 ''references'' from yesterday leaving an MPM! source).  While ultimately I might support a good quality redirect or merge properly done I can't see an obvious target and such matters are best discussed outside AfD.  Thankyou
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO||WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP)

Comment: This is a clear  problem, per nominator. From my research, it's an entirely made up term and is being used as promotional material. Strong hints of COI here. I don't think this article contributes positively to WP
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)