Deletion of Puerto Ricans in NASA

Comment: Even NASA itself goes to length of pointing out Puerto Rican ethnicity of their employees in official communications http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/news/releases/2004/04-266.html Puerto Rico native Pedro Rodriguez named director of major engineering department at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center,http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2003/oct/HQ_03331_engineer_opens.html NASA Engineer Opens Doors To World Of Science and others, and even has an award named for a Puerto Rican cartoon character http://www.msfc.nasa.gov/news/news/releases/2000/00-295.html Charles Scales recognized for efforts at Marshall’s National Hispanic Heritage month celebration. Puerto Ricans in NASA are a strong presence that is recognized by NASA as a discrete grouping. Nominator should have investigated more about the topic before placing for AfD. We do not take personal offense at Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico|WikiProject Puerto Rico, however, the topic is notable and |we are not a paper encyclopedia. Go delete some real cruft, this article is encyclopedic and notable. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PAPER)

Comment: because the article is essentially a list of short bios of people of Puerto Rican decent whom are members of NASA and I believe that is in conflict with #INFO. Any salvageable content could be placed in individual articles for the people mentioned. I also just want to add that this is an article by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I just want to say the following. This issue about "ethnicity" or "nation" is not relevant at all to the deletion rationale. The reason this article should be deleted is because it is a database of mini-bios in conflict with #INFO. It is not something someone would find on an encyclopedia which is what Wikipedia is suppose to be. All of the "strong keep" votes made above are made on the basis of . Comments such as "why doesn't somebody takes a nice PROD tour trough all of those Robot Chicken episodes articles" are not keep rationales based on policy. Should the closing admin decide to keep this on the basis of such votes it will be a true determent to the afd process as it will make the implicit statement that rationales made on the basis of ILikeIt are on equal footing with those based on policy
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: regarding the above "strong keep" votes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Puerto_Rico#Notice this can be interpreted as a violation of 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Canvassing (WP:CANVASS)