Deletion of Fernanda Staniscuaski

Comment: GScholar citability is too low to indicate satisfying  yet. The claims to passsing  for social activism do not stand up to the actual sruitiny of sources. The Science article https://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6504/609.full mentioned by Beccaynr above contains a brief quote by the subject. Ref number 2 in the articlehttps://www.forwomeninscience.com/noticias/parent-in-science-conheca-o-projeto-que-discute-a-maternidade-e-paternidade-dentro-do-universo-da-ciencia-brasileira/ is a dead link but in any event it was to a forum that she founded, so the source would not have been independent anyway. Ref number 3https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/advan.00216.2018 is a proceedings report co-authored by the subject herself, so again not an independent source. Ref number 4https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/donna/maternidade/noticia/2019/04/maternidade-no-lattes-pesquisadoras-poderao-indicar-tempo-de-licenca-no-curriculo-cjuvrglxl00s201rowc4q0cgj.html is behind a paywall so I wasn't able to access it (perhaps someone else has better luck). Ref number 5http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652021000100201&tlng=en is co-authored by the subject herself so again not independent. Ref number 6https://g1.globo.com/ciencia-e-saude/noticia/2018/11/13/cientistas-mulheres-pedem-inclusao-de-periodo-de-licenca-maternidade-no-curriculo-lattes.ghtml contains just a brief mention of her. Ref number 9https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6492/724.1 is again co-authored by the subject herself.  requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, where "significant" means that the coverage "addresses the topic directly and in detail". I am not seeing anything here coming even close to satisfying this requirement, based on the sources provided so far. Some people want to see at least three examples of significant coverage for satisfying . Personally, I'd be satisfied with two. Here I'm not seeing even one for the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: she fails  but she has gained exposure and coverage due to her activism around parenting in academia. On top of the English sources there are quite a few more in Portuguese/Spanish
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF)

Comment: Fails , but just about passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:GNG)