Deletion of 2011–12 Los Angeles arson attacks (3rd nomination)

Comment: multiple reliable sources that cover the events in an in-depth manor to pass ''signficant coverage'' as required by . Coverage is beyond 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: According to /CA, "media coverage can confer notability on a high-profile criminal act, provided such coverage meets the above guidelines and those regarding reliable sources". As far as I can see, the event (or serial of events) reached significant media coverage, and the article is well written and well referenced with RS
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Certainly seems more than a routine news event as the http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/05/arson-suspects-mother-ordered-extradited-to-germany.html plot has thickened. I would also like to say this crime is not http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/harry-burkhart-arson-susp_n_1180962.html routine by any means. Since it involes the guy,and his mom, and there are lots of articles out there on both of them. Like http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-05-24/business/sns-rt-usa-arsonextraditionl1e8gom3b-20120524_1_extradition-document-judge-charles-f-eick-initial-court-hearing this one for example. Passes  because it "This page in a nutshell: An event is presumed to be notable if it receives significant, non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time. Coverage should be in multiple reliable sources with national or global scope." All of the criteria is met. This whole flying his mom business is weird, on top of the massive scope of this guys damage. Notable to me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)

Comment: I have to agree with PortlandOregon97217 that  is met.  The situation received significant, non-routine, international coverage in many reliable news sources (e.g. the http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16376919 BBC, the http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jan/04/los-angeles-arson-suspect-charged Guardian and the http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=251965 Jerusalem Post).  A ''Los Angeles Times'' news article about the story dated to May 2012 was already posted which provides evidence that coverage "persists over a period of time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENT)