Deletion of 2019 New Orleans shooting

Comment: per . There are several sources and many of them are national sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: While the subject shall not simply stands with comprehensive coverage because it was a news event and per . I searched https://www.google.com/search?q=mass+shooting+new+orleans+2019&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS851US851&tbs=qdr:m&sxsrf=ALeKk00fikADHp7jZtCT0yMbbDSzOSBENA:1585281582278&ei=Lnp9Xv_DEIfb-gTRkKmICg&start=40&sa=N&ved=2ahUKEwj_ktKM4rnoAhWHrZ4KHVFICqEQ8tMDegQICxAz&biw=1300&bih=873 related articles of last month (as of Mar 2020), and still see multiple references and mentioned link towards the subject, when reporting other shootings or describing the safety or gun violence. such as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: per StonyBrook.  demands that coverage should exist "over a period of time", ie, there is critical commentary showing impact ''after'' the initial news cycle. This shooting, which is pretty routine, does not demonstrate that. &spades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Unfortunately mass shootings are a fairly routine event in the U.S.  states that "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes)...whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually '''not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:EVENTCRIT)