Deletion of Pav Akhtar

Comment: as notable politician and activist.  Members of state/provincial legislatures (''e.g.,'' London City Council) are ''per se'' |notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: seems like an interesting character, but fails  & 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO)

Comment: A local councillor does not meet . He has quite bit of press in the Guardian as a student activist but nothing of significance or importance that would guarantee long-term historical notability in my view, so I lean towards delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: likely |autobiography by |single-purpose account. Does not demonstrate |biographical notability. First Muslim to ''win'' an office would be arguably notable, but first to run is not, by itself
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO||WP:SPA||WP:BIO)

Comment: Please assume good faith; whether this article fails or passes , it does so very close to the borderline, and as such there are plenty of people, first-time contributors or not, who find Akhtar notable enough for an article, without him having to write his own autobiography. Regarding notability, he has held a notable and conspicuous public office (President of Cambridge University Students Union), and been a councillor. While these are not alone enough to pass , the secondary coverage and furore created by the Black Students' affair, and Akhtar's activities and such since, mean that he is a well-known figure covered in several independent sources. That said, if there is consensus to delete, I'm in favour of that too (as I said, its a borderline case
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N)

Comment: Local politician.  fails  for politicians
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)