Deletion of Snowboarders v. Skiiers Conflict

Comment: per ''all'' the big three: ,  and . --&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:POV)

Comment: WP:NPOV|POV |OR mini-essay
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: This article can be fixed. Sure, it needs to comply with  and less original research, but it can be made into a sufficient article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: WP:CLEANUP is not a keep rationale.  requires multiple sources. Fails  as this cannot be confirmed as anything but perhaps a local phenonomena
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V)

Comment: Seems interesting enough" is not a criterion for inclusion. This article is |original research, |biased (''the skiiers represent the traditional mode of alpine recreation, the snowboarders are comprised mostly of a unorthodox, avant-garde coterie''... sez who?), and the only potentially reliable source included in the article has next to nothing to do with the topic at hand, as mentioned by Steve above. Not the basis for an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POV)