Deletion of Bhagwanji

Comment: There is enough coverage about Gumnami Baba in , one of the latest beinghttps://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/new-twist-to-gumnami-baba-mystery/articleshow/74238724.cms. It may be appropriately tagged with different maintenance tags
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I think there is a notable article on this subject, but this article is a complete mess. It is a mixture of hagiography, conjecture,  and . Clean up would take more effort than . I agree with {{u|Mccapra}} a clean start (in Drafts) would be the best way forward.  &nbsp;&nbsp;//&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTH||WP:TNT)

Comment: Thanks Timothy for reviewing my article. I've tried to remove some text which might have been considered . I've carefully tried to keep the article free of any conjecture or POV. The man is notable as UP Government is going to set up a museum to preserve his items and also the High Court has termed his items as national asset. No conspiracy theory has been described any where in the article. The content is purely based on news reports from , judicial verdicts and statements. Please let me know
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:RS)