Deletion of List of Playboy Playmates of 2014

Comment: Seems WP:DP hasn't kept up with BLP.  places the burden on restoring content in BLPs to those arguing for inclusion.  clarifies this. In the specific case of this article, I'd say that arguments about the value of the information in the article fail anything like . Of course we could push the issue by just deleting the content, but that might interfere with this AfD too much
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE||WP:BLPDEL)

Comment: or reduce to a true list article: Should this be listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Lists? As a '''''list''''' this article fails  (the list and many individual entries), , and . This is a anual of Style/Stand-alone lists#General formatting|Subheading-structured  (stand alone) list of specific people. The creation of a list article is still subject to Wikipedia:Notability (people). " states that "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". What independent (let alone reliable) sources? Has anyone seen this list; List of people in Playboy 2010–19. The section "2014" contains the names of the 2014 playmates and one of the "lists" are redundant. All of the playmate links in the list links to to other lists and not to articles. This is the circular pattern all of the list conform to. We should either have policies and guidelines to build a better encyclopedia or forget about them
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:LSC||WP:LISTN||WP:M)