Deletion of Agha Waqar Ahmad

Comment: though the person has got some coverage by the media but still he is not notable per . (A little off the debate) After watching demonstration of his invention on television, it looks like a fraud, which we should not be part of by promoting him or his invention. I don't find him or his work suitable for encyclopedia until it is thoroughly checked and certified by professionals, which is yet to happen
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: to Agha Waqar's Water Fuelled Car Water-fuelled_car#Agha_Waqar_Ahmad, although I don't think BLP1E applies (an invention is hardly an event), all of the coverage about him, and the article itself, just says that he invented the car, this content is already covered in the article about the car, so in that sense this article is a duplicate of the other one. This biography may meet  point 2 at some point in the future, but for now it is |too soon
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: to Agha Waqar's Water Fuelled Car or Water-fuelled_car#Agha_Waqar_Ahmad if the former is deleted. Subject is an example of a classic , and is non-notable outside of this one "event." (As a scientist and skeptic, I just couldn't resist putting event in quotes. Sorry
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per  and  This is clearly a Quack who has been glorified by the "wise" Pakistani Media.{{sarcasm}}  also applies. The news articles on him raises further questions on the reliability of the Pakistani media and its news articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RECENT)

Comment: to Water-fuelled_car#Agha_Waqar_Ahmad per arguments provided above. This chap seems to have come up with this idea in good faith (and has received considerable attention too due to this unexplored technology) but as can be seen, there are question marks over the model's scientific process. I think we should leave the job of working out the authenticity of the model to scientists, and time should tell for itself how this goes. For now, a devoted section on Water fuelled car would be good and also /, as has been done in that article for other similar inventors in the past who claimed to have made certain breakthroughs in this technology
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABLE||WP:DUE)