Deletion of Jesus Taught Me

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: for lack of |notability. Also, there are potential  issues here that are worth avoiding
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BLP1E)

Comment: No explanation was provided for such a rapid renomination; if you want to challenge the close of the previous AfD,  is that way
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: Wikipedia is |not an indiscriminate collection of information. This is an old video of a martial arts student beating up a man. Some saw it on Youtube years later and were outraged. The one newspaper story attached as a reference says the injured man was a vagrant who was later seen limping around the area. Fails |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:N)

Comment: The coverage is not enough to make it much more than #NEWS|a news story
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Has adequate sources. It's generally considered very poor form to nominate an article less than a month after a previous AFD,  would have been a more appropriate forum. There was no consensus to delete at the last AFD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DRV)

Comment: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube cat abuse incident &mdash; an AFD on an article I created back in February of this year. That incident, also involving a YouTube video of atrocious conduct, made international headlines, but the article was deleted on the grounds of . I see no reason why this case would be any different &mdash; there isn't even as much coverage of this as there was of the cat abuse incident. A case could also be made that this article fails Wikipedia:Notability (films)|the notability criteria for films
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)