Deletion of List of fictional trios

Comment: and make into a category per .  This list cannot ever be complete, and has no good intrusion criteria. No prejudice against writing a better sourced article in place of this
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLT)

Comment: As per . And how come Yippy, Yappy and Yahooey are not on the list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Fails #INFO, no viable inclusion criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as  unless and until |reliable sources treating the concept "fictional trios" in a scholarly manner are cited. See also 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RS||WP:SALAT)

Comment: Very vague topic that can cover a very wide variety of subjects, and there's nothing particularly useful about a list of trios. See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: dreck per ; what, every wikt:Tom, Dick or Harry gets a list entry? We discriminate per . Cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:IINFO)

Comment: per nom. Too much |original research involved in determining which characters to classify within a trio
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)