Deletion of F.C. Porto (boxing)

Comment: The argument for keeping these amounts to .  Those voting keep simply need to post significant independent coverage.  The discussion isn't about their existence, it's about their notability.Special:Contributions/204.126.132.231|204.126.132.231
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: I would also vote to delete the basketball article as it now stands.  I have no idea what it means to be the club boxing champion of Portugal, so it's hard for me to evaluate the significance of this achievement.  However, it is easy for me to evaluate an article with no secondary sources.  If someone produces independent sources for the basketball team that are not just routine sports coverage, then the article can be kept.  As for the other sports, some of them look to be lacking in good sources, but that's a discussion for another day.  I have no objection to the individual sports teams of this club having articles, ''if'' they have the coverage necessary to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: This article does not have the independent reliable sources required by .  — Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/131.118.229.17|131.118.229.17
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Arguing that the articles should exist because similar articles do is a |really bad argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)