Deletion of Delmart Vreeland

Comment: Lack of non-trivial #Independent sources|independent, third-party sources makes this article unworthy of inclusion at Wikipedia. Note that off-handed mentions in 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists' books do not afford encyclopedic notability on this person, and referencing these sources in a |BLP is about as problematic as you can get
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE||WP:BLP)

Comment: A few good sources which seem to just about meet , although I'm not sure the coverage is long-lasting
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: mdash; no evidence of substantial or lasting |notability. The sources appear to mostly be local in nature, almost anything can get published on a slow news day. This just doesn't clear the bar
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: per Alzarian16. Just barely passes  via coverage by Detroit News, Waterloo Courier, Toronto Star, and LA Weekly. Get rid of all those crappy sources (such as fromthewilderness.com and the campus radio station's mp3 files and web page) and rewrite using the other more reliable sources. The Baltimore Chronicle book review can be handily used as a source to mention that Vreeland's case has traction among conspiracy enthusiasts. The image "Delmart Vreeland Note.jpg" will have to go too, "guerrillanews.com" is not a reliable source
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)