Deletion of Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel

Comment: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and other policies being cited is not enough for us to just ignore the subject that this is |a person notable for ''one'' event, and |a person who is a terrorist of that event. Unless this man turns out to be notable for other things of course
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: and '''Redirect''' to 2016 Nice attack per . Only notable for killing incident people, and media coverage does not justify stand only article per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per  and . Once enough info is obtained about the perpetrator (e.g early life and other stuff), then it would be applicable to create an article about the killer
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: for now, it's probable that the media will produce significant coverage for the individual similarly to the individuals behind the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting|2016 Orlando shooting and the November 2015 Paris attacks|2015 Paris attacks, as mentioned already by several above. If this is not the case (which I doubt but I'm not going to  here) then by all means a merger would be acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CBALL)

Comment: as per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per . The attack is relevant. The murderer is not
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: or '''keep''' if the article becomes ). Per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOBIG||WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per . Special:Contributions/70.51.84.138|70.51.84.138
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: The key difference between Bouhlel and all these other attacks is that these other perpetrators' articles actually offer a comprehensive biography of the subject, not just four sentences about what they were doing before the attack. There simply isn't enough known about Bouhlel to warrant his own article at the moment () (
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:RECENTISM)

Comment: The subject of this article is not notable outside of the Nice attack, and the Nice attack article has not reached the 50KB size to justify a 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Splitting (WP:SIZESPLIT)

Comment: WP:ONEEVENT, . This terrorist is not independently notable; his noteworthiness is inextricably bound up in the atrocity he committed. Moreover, splitting content is unwise because it creates duplication and forces readers to go to two pages when really they could just as adequately go to just one
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: see above references to  and |CRM#2
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:CRIM)

Comment: with 'attack' page as per , any estimation of how much biog info will materialise is pure |guess work,  applies and as a purely practical matter we know it will make keeping the 'attack' and 'perp.' articles harder to patrol and keep aligned
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:CRYSTALBALL||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as per , there's simply not very much ''there'' and it's  to determine whether more will come out. If more information surfaces, I may not object to creating a new article then
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: per . &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per  STUFF EXISTS in high numbers (see categories at Major Hasan or the 60 subcategories under :Category:Assassins by nationality). An interwiki link has also appeared to analogous entry in the Arabic Wikipedia
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHER)

Comment: per the |notability guideline. "''if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per  and the quote highlighted by {{u|Ilovetopaint}} above
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIM)

Comment: into the 2016 Nice attack article. Only notable for committing the attack and anything pertinent about the perpetrator can be added there so there is no need to create a 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Merging (WP:DUPLICATE)

Comment: as per the |CRM#2 as follows: The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role.11
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIM)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR)

Comment: The content in the Bouhlel's article can fit into a section of the 2016 Nice attack article. In response to rationales above, we are not deleting valuable information via a merge, the attacker has no significance outside of the event, and merging just changes the location. Also suggesting a merge based on comments above and 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIM)

Comment: as  does allow for  articles for reasons of space, and this article is pretty long and comprehensive to the point that it would be |unduly inappropriate to just paste it all back into 2016 Nice attack
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERPETRATOR||WP:SPINOUT||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: per |CRM#2. Very unusual way this attack was carried out etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CRIM)