Deletion of Cory Burnell

Comment: Many crappy refs, but there's gold amidst the dross; between the ''Seattle Times'' and ''USA Today'' articles there's a clear pass of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I direct the Delete proponents to , which states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list."  Burrell is mentioned in significant detail in several reliable sources; done deal.  Whether he is now embarrassed by some of his past involvements - as the nom suggests without proffering any evidence of the same - is irrelevant.  Whether he disputes the accuracy of the news reports - again, something a Delete proponent alleges without proffering any evidence of the same - is irrelevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)