Deletion of Operation Sarindar

Comment: It is definitely POV fork. It's called "Operation Sarindar", but operation Sarindar according to Pacepa referred only to Lybia and Pacepa claimed that  '''simialr''' plan existed for Iraq. Pacepa never said that this plan for Iraq was called "Sarindar". Moreover, "Operation sarindar" refers only to Pacepa allegations. Biophys has added under this already contraversial title allegations of John A. Shaw and Yossef Bodansky - which do not claim that this was called "Operation Sarindar". So even the title of this article - Original research - because Biophys never supported that Shaw and Bodansky called this plan - "Operation Sarindar" and Biophys never proved that plan for Iraq was called by Pacepa "Operation Sarindar" (this name existed for Lybia only). Additionaly, Biophys inserts original research statements not supported any sources that "similar (to Pacepa) statements were made by Shaw, Bodansky and McInerney" - which is both violation of  and . Biophys makes a point by publishing this article - that Russia is guilty of WMD proliferation. Although, there are '''academic sources''' (!!!) evidencing sale of chemical and biological weapons to Iraq by the US he never added them to the article - that is the reason why Biophys was changing the name of the article - not to let other editors to add these sources against the US - it is also  and  violations. See all sources about the US proliferation there http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Operation_Sarindar#Ion_Mihai_Pacepa. Further, Pacepa, as was said, defected in 1978, -  his allegations that he knew anything about modern Iraq - are hilarious and attempt to earn extra money for his defection
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:POINT||WP:POINT||WP:TEND)

Comment: POV fork of a POV fork.  This page used to be about "Russia and Saddam WMD" and it narrowly survived AfD. I and other editors added in information questioning the legitimacy of the claims made here, so the user who created the page, {{User|Biophys}}, renamed it, creating a POV fork that allowed him to delete much of the information that had been added.  What is left here is simply not notable.  This is mostly one Romanian guy's fantasy, with support from suspected criminal John Shaw.  Neither has any evidence to back their statements up, and the ISG, Pentagon, and Russian government have said so.  "Operation Sarindar" gets exactly http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=%22operation+sarindar&btnG=Search 17 google hits, not one of them a .  Fourth hit is wikipedia; most of the rest are blogs like "fuckfrance.com."  Hardly notable.  I did a lexis/nexis search and a search of proquest newspapers and got exactly zero hits.  Not one in major newspapers, magazines, or journals owned by either database.  This topic is far less notable than the conspiracy theory that narrowly survived AfD a week ago.  This page is a POV fork of that page and should be deleted.  The one source for most of the claims, Ion Mihai Pacepa, defected in 1978 and would have no basis for knowing anything that happened in the 1990s and 2000s between Russia and Saddam.  This is all speculation portrayed as if it were fact, mostly from sources like Newsmax that fail the test of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)