Deletion of Jonathon Sharkey (6th nomination)

Comment: I have to agree with the user above, I feel that  should be taken into account here, and a large chunk of the sources in the article are FEC records and candidate listings that don't afford him any specific significant coverage per . Additionally, concerning his other career as a wrestler, the article as-is does not give us a strong case for  either. Finally, I think it's important to note that when dealing with BLP issues, |the deadline is now; consideration of the effect of an article on its living subject is a standard here per  and not something that can simply be rebuked by citing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE||WP:POLITICIAN||WP:ATHLETE||WP:NOW||WP:BLP||WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: per SportingFlyer and Vaticidalprophet. This is a case of borderline notability, not strong or solid enough to overcome the subject's objections.  applies here, IMO. No objection to to a redirect, if there is an appropriate target to direct it to
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)

Comment: has SIGCOV in multiple RS satisfying . 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: Very clearly meets  as he has had extensive news coverage for a wide variety of incidents. If there are errors, those should definitely be fixed, but this person definitely qualifies for an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per prior nominations. This is not the first time the subject has requested the article's deletion, and each prior time consensus has been that he is notable enough to warrant an article. |Wikipedia is not censored based on a subject's preference
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTCENSORED)

Comment: Maybe I'm missing something, but I really don't see how he's clearly notable after a source review? We don't typically keep articles on candidates who have failed to win, and while we sometimes keep perennial candidates, they would generally have lots of coverage. I see a lot of FEC campaign filings and local interest/"and finally..." news articles in the article, and not a lot of coverage from someone who's either a wrestler or a serious candidate who's notable enough to have a stand-alone article. As an example, he's only briefly mentioned in the 2012 primary article and the 2006 gubernatorial election article. Per , what I see here is a page about a relatively unknown, private individual who's requested it to be deleted. We should respect that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE)