Deletion of Penelope Trunk (3rd nomination)

Comment: satisfies , significant discussion among secondary sources. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)

Comment: I think I have sufficiently "rescued" what was a poorly sourced article about a subject who I believe meets the criteria outlined in . I've added multiple secondary sources from major newspapers. She's authored three books, been a syndicated columnist, and has a career blog that is not infrequently mentioned in reliable sources. The article was not good before, but that doesn't mean she doesn't meet the notability criteria. And I think I've addressed the primary source problem and added sufficient context to make it a decent article. I don't see how this article could warrant deletion at this point when there was no consensus the previous two times
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)