Deletion of List of unlawfully killed transgender people (2nd nomination)

Comment: Aside from the euphemistic title ("unlawfully killed" should just be "murdered"), this article does not fulfill , which specifies ''A person is typically included in a list of people only if all the following requirements are met: The person meets the Wikipedia notability requirement...'' Aside from a smattering of the very well known cases from the 2000s, the vast majority of people/cases on this list are clearly not notable. If following guidelines and removing them, there'd be little left. If the article is kept, it will have to be stubbed according to guidelines. Otherwise, it's just , as has been mentioned above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTPEOPLE||WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: WP:INDISCRIMINATE|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and no degree of cleanup, as if that were the issue, would change that; this is simply a list of |synthed incidents that otherwise were not independently notable. Perhaps a new article detailing violence on transgender people could/should exist but this list does not convey the significance of such a topic in an encyclopedic way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: per . There is no point in having a list about non-notable incidents that are mostly written in violation of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATSBOOK||WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: and consider adding the names of those for whom a Wikipedia article exists into a new Category, if a goal is to create a page where there is a list of names/articles all sharing this characteristic. This has been done for, eg, :Category:American victims of anti-LGBT hate crimes. Main reason for deletion is straight from policy (): "Wikipedia articles are not ... Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations, aphorisms, or persons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The list first violates Wikipedia fundamental pillar of |Neutrality both in title and content. How does Wikipedia determine who is killed ''unlawfully'' and who is killed ''lawfully''? It also violates  and these are two clear reasons for deletion. Consider first entry in 2017. If and independent reporter asks Saudi Police how would they say they killed her ''unlawfully''? How can the reporter himself decided it is unlawful or lawful killing while he is neither judge nor court? Which court issued verdict they are killed unjustly and the jurisdiction of the court. Consider the 3rd entry in 2017 again. Who is definitely sure (with  multiple |RS, of course) that the woman was killed because of her gender? Who determined it is unlawful? Should we make list of everybody found dead somewhere and label it killed ''unlawfully''?. This list is one of the most serious blatant violation of Wikipedia policy I have seen in the recent and is eroding its neutrality. I analyzed more than 10 entries and weigh them with the sources and I only understand that this list is soapboxing and propaganda by Transgender activist for emotional and cause benefit and to  as clearly said above. And this against fundamental tenets of Wikipedia plainly
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:RS||WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS)