Deletion of Barbara Gibb

Comment: no genuine reason has been given for deletion.   is .  Her notability derives from being related to these popular musicians; the deletion request should be framed by  looking at coverage and/or  regarding , but  is definitely 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTPOLICY||WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:LOWPROFILE||WP:NOTINHERITED||WP:NOTPOLICY)

Comment: Per , relationships do not confer notability, the subject doesn't qualify for a standalone article. Now, if assuming that this article is about a singer then it clearly crashes at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:MUSIC)

Comment: doesn't meet  on own merits. Just because it's verifiable doesn't mean it's notable. The article refers to the subject in the context of her famous sons
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Does not meet  (and doesn't qualify as any of the categories that have more specific criteria; if you count her claimed singing career, that clearly doesn't meet , as it doesn't even appear to be —the article even hedges by only saying she's described as such in Bee Gees literature). That isn't an essay, btw, it's an official guideline. Doesn't even meet  really: no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, just some stuff from brothersgibb.com (hardly third-party) and passing mentions in the context of her sons. The only source that would seem at first glance to qualify is the Fox News article "Gibb matriarch loses third son with Robin's death", but the headline is misleading; if you read it, it's actually about the deaths of the brothers and barely talks about her at all. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO||WP:MUSIC||WP:GNG||WP:verifiable)