Deletion of Oskaloosa High School (Kansas)

Comment: as Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) essay points out, high school articles are typically kept.  Granted there is an abundance of local coverage (so much it's hard to leaf through the listings of obituaries and other local events), but the events from a decade ago (noted by the nominator) would also clear  and notability is not temporary.  If this one is deleted, it will (like so many others) eventually be brought back when someone finds "the golden ticket" of articles printed online to show that "yes this is as good as any other high school article that we have kept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I sure hope anyone who closes this as keep does so because someone has demonstrated significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject beyond routine local news stories (i.e. ), and not because of the bulk of the keep !vote rationales presented thus far. I don't know if this should be kept or deleted (I haven't researched it because I was made aware of this thread via a discussion that could be framed as canvassing, and thus won't be !voting), but I will be disappointed if the closer gives any weight at all to arguments based on a HS|failed proposal-turned-essay, arguments that directly conflict with https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&oldid=767023947#RfC_on_secondary_school_notability this well advertised, well attended, unchallenged RfC (i.e. the circular "keep because we have kept schools in the past"), or arguments that are either  or otherwise have no basis in policy, e.g. "keep because we should keep high schools," "keep because it's useful," "keep because they're important," "keep because famous people went there", "keep because they're usually notable", or -- I don't even know how to classify this one -- "keep because someone might get shot there someday" ??. &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NHS||WP:AADD)