Deletion of Alfredo Villanueva Collado

Comment: I had refused to !vote before because of my limited knowledge of the topic but Xxanthippe and Agricola44's reasoning makes sense. |Notability requires verifiable evidence. I would change the !vote to keep if the evidence surfaced
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NRVE)

Comment: I don't have access to the references cited, but basing on the list of references, there appears to be significant coverage in multiple sources.  Unless someone confirms the sources are not reliable or adequate must |assume they are reliable and |verify the information in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:V)

Comment: I act as devil's advocate and vote delete, although I am prepared to change my mind on presentation of better evidence. The subject clearly fails rof and has to be assessed on the weaker standards of uthor. One editor says that the subject is an accomplished poet. I am not able to dispute this as I have only a limited knowledge of modern poetry and of Spanish. However the issue for an AfD is not whether the subject is accomplished but whether the subject is notable, specifically whether the subject has been noted. The deep digging of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:A)

Comment: GS gives cites of 6, 5, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 1. That's all. To pass rof #1 many hundreds of cites are usually required so it seems that notability is not achieved here or in any other categories of rof. Article may pass on much weaker standards of uthor but it has to be demonstrated. However, searching GB on 'author:"Alfredo Villanueva Collado"' gives fifteen hits. For notability it is not how much is published but how much it is noted. Input from Hispanic scholars and poets about reviews, awards etc. will be valuable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:P||WP:A)

Comment: After all this time at AfD this is still a mass of unsourced and unsourceable details. There are a few inline citations, supposedly sourcing the publication of his poetry collections, but the quality of the sources is very poor (many not reliable, not about him, etc) so I have no confidence that the many non-online references listed are any better. Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BLP)