Deletion of TruthRevolt

Comment: clearly meets . As well as The Daily Beast, the article cites the Washington Examiner, which is a respectable RS. Also, ''The Hollywood Reporter'' did a good piece on the source.https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/media-matters-gets-some-right-644390 These other sources (https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2013/10/07/meet-the-right-wing-leaders-of-truthrevolt/196320 1,https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/3/lena-dunham-disputes-abuse-allegations/ 2,https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/10/16/truth-revolt-media-matters-sharpton-limbaugh-column/2997567/ 3) may not ''necessarily'' be RS, but they show that this article is notable enough to keep. Right now, it may be puffed up, but it can and should be cleaned up per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RUBBISH)

Comment: to David_Horowitz_Freedom_Center#Programs where the subject is already mentioned. Does not meet  /  for a stand-alone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:NWEB)