Deletion of Allahpundit

Comment: There was a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allah Is in the House|previous AfD, in which it was kept on the basis of Google hits (disregarding the |Google bias), , and being widely referenced by other blogs
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:GOOGLE||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: While the person does seem somewhat noteable, the article is poorly sourced and fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: As stated, there was already an AfD, though it was ''not'' kept on the basis of Google hits or .  It was kept because, during the AfD, Allahpundit subbed for Michelle Malkin, eventually becoming the primary blogger on ''Hot Air'' http://hotair.com/, Malkin's "conservative Internet broadcast network."  This is detailed in the article.  The website's Alexa ranking is about tied with Instapundit's http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=hotair.com&url=hotair.comhttp://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=instapundit.com.   This is the third time the article has been slapped with an AfD by some enterprising user, and frankly I'm sick of how any Internet opinion source (right or left) is automatically assumed to be nonnotable, and any citations on notable blogs, Alexa rankings, significant involvement in political reporting, etc., are waved away as not being/having "reliable sources," yet "personalities" like James Parry|Kibo are justified because ''Wired Magazine'' wrote a story 13 years ago.  This article is sourced and this subject is notable.  And, as stated in Wikipedia:Deletion_policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)