Deletion of Aja (pornographic actress)

Comment: Passes  with the awards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: on the basis of her AVN Award satisfying 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: There is no inherent notability for strippers or performers in pornography. Appears to fail 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: thiese articles are beneath contempt. nnot only is theyre subject matter unnotable (not everyone in porn is famous just because they are mentieoned in a database!!! thats like saying that every actor mentioned in imdb is notable!!!!) Unless someone can find sources that are actually still alive and arent user-generated repositories or dead links that no longer link anywhere, they should be deleted. save the articles to the ones that meet  that actually have some notability outside of internet porndstar databnases. Smith Jones
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: I'll venture a guess the Wikiproject notice might have brought people in.  Regardless, far more than three votes to keep in thirteen minutes is hardly unheard of, and frankly that degree of involvement is desirable.  It's regrettable when there is ''limited'' participation in AfDs, or when people participating have limited or no knowledge of the subject and/or have an open disdain for Wikipedia's written policies and guidelines.  I'd again invite you to participate more constructively in rewriting the guideline if you can conceive of and rationally argue for something better.  I am certain the current guideline is not the best possible one, and I may even agree with your suggestions.  I agree with you, for example, that there are many notable crackpots who should have articles on Wikipedia, but don't.  Canvassing?  
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:GOODFAITH)

Comment: Easily passes PORNBIO due to the award win. |I Don't Like it is not a justifiable reason for an AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Three votes to ''Keep'' in thirteen minutes?  Sounds like someone is violating anvassing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: Suggest an administrator look into the nominator's recent |pointy nominations. http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=25531 Aside from evidence of the nominator's personal crusade, article meets basic notability requirements for inclusion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: Easily passes  through her notable awards. Special:Contributions/86.142.164.55|86.142.164.55
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)