Deletion of Tamer Şahin

Comment: I also find this subject falls far short of  and , especially as it pertains to third party coverage that is both reliable and substantial. I also find it hilarious that a single phrase would be |supported by over 30 cites – it's just a claim he has made an announcement, with '''zero''' third party coverage to indicate significance. This kind of misleading prose and citation fits perfectly among the glut of , related party publications, and insubstantial coverage. It's simply  to turn this into a viable article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ANYBIO||WP:LOTSOFSOURCES||WP:BLPSPS||WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: and '''Useerfy''' until the article meets or at least approaches Wikipedia  and  standards.  I would accept '''Keep''' only if all claims not verified by an independent, verifiable source are removed. The subject may be notable enough for an article but the existing article that is nominated for deletion is  and makes many unverified or exaggerated claims, failing .  For example, the article says that a documentary film was made about Tamer but the film exists only on YouTube.com in Tamer Şahin's YouTube channel, a  and  problem.  The article states that Tamer Şahin "lectures about being a hacker and its philosophy at universities" but the citation is to his own website and, in his website, the only evidence given is a link to photographs of him gesturing in photographs in albums on his FaceBook page. I could find no independent documentation that he actually lectured at a university. Most lectures on a university campus are well publicized on the Internet
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SOURCES||WP:PROMOTION||WP:NPOV||WP:POV||WP:COI)