Deletion of Gomolo.in

Comment: clearly fails {WP:N and .  has nothign to do with this topic, nor does it meet that either. This is an unnotable website that frankly appears to be on a campaign to gain notability by appearing in Wikipedia, rather than appearing in Wikipedia because it is notable. The three little links above, all regurgitation of a press release about a survey the site did, does not meet any requirement for notability. Guidelines are very clear that one can not make itself notable just by releasing a lot of press releases
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:GROUP)

Comment: my search for sources only found one tangential comment - and that in a blurb from the parent company. No third party sourcing = Fail  = delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: clearly FAILS  . Please delete it. I think should've been speedy deleted Special:Contributions/122.167.95.254|122.167.95.254
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: currently fails , , etc - as documented above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WEB)

Comment: Article fails  and . Article was speedied deleted twicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Gomolo.in&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= under #A7 and  twice previously failed to meet Wikipedias inclusion guidelines. Article currently has 2 sources; ravisa.in (owns Gomolo.in) and a link containing trivial coverage. Neither are sufficient to establish notability. Wikipedia is an ikipedia is an encyclopedia|encyclopedia - as such many articles hat Wikipedia is not|do not belong here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:WEB||WP:CSD||WP:W||WP:W)