Deletion of Storefront (company)

Comment: per HighKing - I looked at the NYT article and it really doesn't have much analysis, just quotes the company, and techcrunch is the epitome of churnalism.  is also a perfectly valid -REASON
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROMO||WP:DEL)

Comment: ping|Wumbolo}} I think two sources is generally considered on the low side when it comes to , especially for a recent company (as opposed to an older one where sources may be less available). What is your evaluation of the tone of the page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: the two sources provided above satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)