Deletion of Yannick Dias Pupo

Comment: WP:BIO does state that players who are recognised first team squad members (which he appears to be) at major clubs (which Sporting undoubtedly is) can have an article.  Also, can anyone read enough Portuguese to work out if http://www.record.pt/noticia.asp?id=753258&idCanal=24 this, http://jn.sapo.pt/2007/08/02/desporto/paulo_renato_fica_e_yannick_pupo_rum.html this, http://www.maisfutebol.iol.pt/noticia.php?div_id=1457&id=838944 this, http://www.maisfutebol.iol.pt/noticia.php?id=840946&div_id=1442 this and http://www.record.pt/noticia.asp?id=751947&idCanal=24 this qualify as reliable sources?  If they do then he passes , which is the main decider of notability and therefore surely renders whether he's actually played or not irrelevant
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: until ''actual'' evidence of notability is available. |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)