Deletion of The Existential Adulteration of Harry Potter

Comment: I can't see where this was covered in anything that would show notability for this work. The problem with asserting that something lends to various genres of literature and fields of research is that you must prove its notability by providing coverage in reliable sources such as newspaper articles, scholarly articles, and the like. I can't see where this has actually received any true coverage anywhere. You can claim that the work adds to this or that field or genre, but without proof it will still fail our notability guidelines. It isn't personal against the work, it's just that every article must assert notability per  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nomination; insufficient |notability as (not) evidenced by |reliable 3rd party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:RS)

Comment: Can be recreated if it is proved to satisfy |our guidelines.  Right now, it's |too soon.  Like S.O. above says, we need proof that it's used as a tool or aid
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NBOOK||WP:TOOSOON)