Deletion of List of Mobile Suit Gundam mobile weapons

Comment: per #PLOT because Wikipedia articles aren't summary-only descriptions of fictional works. Needs something to describe out of universe context, namely why this is notable. But without third party sources, there's no way to erify notability, so this article can never meet our basic guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:V)

Comment: per the total absence of secondary sources. A search in GBooks yielded only wikipedia mirrors and a few mere mentions; not enough for a SAL. Fails , ,  etc
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST||WP:LISTN||WP:NOTDIR||WP:IINFO||WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: Per , one way to judge the acceptability of lists is whether the subject as a whole has been covered in sources.  I find it very unlikely that the subject of mobile weapons in Mobile Suit Gundam has not been covered in reliable sources, as the series is highly popular and successful, and the mobile weapons are of central importance to both the plot of the series and its popularity among fans.  I understand that sources need to be found, but I would expect they are available and doubt that the nominator has actually looked for them (due to his nominating several related subjects, without seeming to really consider each one).  I would think that checking the sources listed in other articles on the series, such as in the articles Mobile Suit Gundam, Gundam (mobile suit), and White Base, would be a good place to start (but I probably don't have time to check them myself, or even access to any that are non-online sources).  In addition, several of the items in this list have their own articles, and it seems backwards to delete the list while leaving the articles on individual entries in place.  Also, about the policies stated by other people above, I don't believe  has any relation to this list (it isn't a directory or any of the other things listed there).  I also don't think  is relevant, since it seems to primarily be about people and doesn't agree with , presumably because people are a special exception where due to  concerns a standalone list of people should generally only contain entries that are each notable individually.  For a subject other than people, each individual entry in the list need not be notable per .   is a more valid concern, but I think this list would be acceptable since it is a subtopic of the larger topic of Mobile Suit Gundam, and the larger topic is not covered in an only in-universe fashion.  The mobile weapons are of central importance to the larger topic, so it seems reasonable to list them in a list (similar to how lists of characters in fictional works are regularly kept at AFD, even when they generally cover the subjects in an in-universe fashion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:NOTDIR||WP:NLIST||WP:LISTN||WP:BLP||WP:LISTN||WP:NOTPLOT)

Comment: per , particularly . Oh yes, and per , , , and  too
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY||WP:FAILN||WP:NOTDIR||WP:FANCRUFT||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:NLIST)

Comment: I'd like to see some proof that the nominator performed  before nominating this for deletion.  My understanding is that Claritas has been banned from making AfDs and they have apparently broken this ban.  If this is the case, rather than discussing this AfD, we should be discussing blocking Claritas
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: per , , and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:NOTPLOT||WP:NLIST)