Deletion of OMICS Publishing Group

Comment: Only found two legitimate new articles, one shown here http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, and both extremely negative, on the company.  Not enough to pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: As shown by the references in the article, this organization has been the subject of articles in Nature and the New York Times, both in depth, reliable sources. It passes general notability guidelines, per . The article does not seem promotional and while short, is well cited. A notable organization and no major article problems suggests keeping this article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Bad faith proposal. Clearly easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)