Deletion of Big Blue Book

Comment: Just looking at the first few of http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=a8N&num=100&q=%22Big%20Blue%20Books%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wp these 313 Google Books hits finds http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=oEoi0HnF7j0C&pg=RA1-PR23&dq=%22Big+Blue+Books%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=6#v=onepage&q=%22Big%20Blue%20Books%22&f=false this and http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EE8WoLAwjiMC&pg=PA202&dq=%22Big+Blue+Books%22&num=100&client=firefox-a&cd=13#v=onepage&q=%22Big%20Blue%20Books%22&f=false this. I would urge the nominator to take the few seconds needed to follow  in the future to avoid wasting everyone else's time in discussing articles on such clearly notable subjects
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: The Big Blue Books were significant for much the same reason as the sister Little Blue Books: The Big Blue Book series sold a great many copies, and many of its works were ''originals'' by |“notable” authors, such as Joseph McCabe, Bertrand Russell (''An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish'', Big Blue Book B-345), and sexologist D. O. Cauldwell.  The present article is a ''stub'', and hence lacks a great deal of what one might ultimately want in an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTE)