Deletion of Katherine C. Hughes

Comment: This is . Fails GNG and . The most substantial role is a supporting role and all others are guest apprearances
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:ENT)

Comment: As per , I've overturned https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FKatherine_C._Hughes&type=revision&diff=735566085&oldid=735172853 this non-admin close in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFitindia&type=revision&diff=735571635&oldid=735570234 This comment by the closer explicitly states that he closed based on (a) quantity of votes and (b) the existence of a VIAF file. As per , this is a discussion rather than a vote. The VIAF file was never brought up by any participant of this discussion, so basing a close on that certainly trends toward a |supervote. I've overturned the closure based on both of these issue, and any uninvolved editor may reclose according to the relevant policies and guidelines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NACD||WP:CONSENSUS||WP:SUPERVOTE)