Deletion of Japan Airlines Flight 2

Comment: Clearly notable; by definition, meets the :  "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." It was not a "routine" accident or news event. It was not heroic like US Airways Flight 1549 where everyone also survived, but was an equally spectacular civil aviation accident involving a commercial airliner carrying over a hundred passengers and crew. It perhaps did not have "lasting" effects (which might also be true of Flight 1549), but any passenger airline accidental landing/crash not on an airport runway always receives extensive attention and becomes notable; this one is eminently suitable for standalone inclusion in the encyclopedia. ikiProject_Aviation/Aircraft_accidents_and_incidents, which seems to be a guideline for articles about airports, aircraft and airlines (not aviation accidents by themselves), is not relevant here. This is not an article about an airport, airline or aircraft; it is an article about a notable aviation accident
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:W)

Comment: meets  and  with flying colours. The fact that they rescued the aircraft from the water and actually returned it to service is pretty rare, and possibly almost unique in commercial passenger aviation.  is a guideline, and cannot overrule GNG
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:PERSISTENCE||WP:AIRCRASH)