Deletion of Toothing (2nd nomination)

Comment: Richard proved that it's notable with reliable and verifiable sources. The article meets the criteria of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Reuters may be a , but they are a wire service that prints pretty much anything. A trivial article here or there isn't notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: I hope the closing nominator realizes these "keep" votes are  and  with no weight at all. There are absolutely ''no'' reliable sources, no matter how much you tell me "But, but, but, it's notable! Really! Trust me!" Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters • :User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSNOTABLE||WP:ILIKEIT)