Deletion of T. Geenakumari

Comment: Fails  Though she has not won any major election or public post. She does get passing mention due to her  petitions on the Supreme court case of Entry of women to Sabarimala https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/women-entering-sabarimala-sc-declines-urgent-hearing-on-contempt-plea-against-temple-authorities/articleshow/67361633.cms https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/clashes-rock-kerala-day-after-women-enter-sabarimala-temple-250-injured-during-bandh/story-4TkIeRCihntNbPmoGVghQM.html. I dont think this merits an article for this person
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: per the above which demonstrates that she passes  and is notable as an activist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: she has relatively significant sustained coverage as a women's rights activist beyond what {{u|DBigXray}} already mentioned to pass per .{{cite news |last= |first= |date=21 December 2010 |title=Alimony to women is not a welfare scheme but a right: Activists |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/alimony-to-women-is-not-a-welfare-scheme-but-a-right-activists/727512/2 |work=Indian Express }}{{cite news |last= |first= |date=2 March 2012 |title=T'puram is Kerala's divorce capital too |url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/tpuram-is-keralas-divorce-capital-too-453918.html |work=News 18|location=Thiruvananthapuram }}{{cite news |last= |first= |date=16 July 2019 |title=School students in Thiruvananthapuram can now get sanitary napkins for free |url=https://www.edexlive.com/news/2019/jul/16/school-students-in-thiruvananthapuram-can-now-get-sanitary-napkins-for-free-7060.html |work=edX }} She has also been cited in the works of the International Development Research Centre and the Laurie Baker Centre for Habitual Studies.{{cite book |last1=Singh |first1=Kriti |date=2013 |title=Separated and Divorced Women in India:Economic Rights and Entitlements |url=https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/openebooks/051-3/index.html |page=185 |publisher=Sage Publications |isbn=978-1-55250-551-9|via=International Development Research Centre }}{{cite journal |last1=Kannan |first1=K.P |last2=Raveendran |first2=G |date=October 2017 |title=Poverty, Women and Capability |url=http://kudumbashree.org/storage/files/1yzdo_kshree%20full%20ms_kpkcorrected%20with%20cover_08.11.17-1.pdf |journal=Laurie Baker Centre for Habitual Studies |page=34  }} In light of these, she should pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:BASIC)

Comment: per  and . She is not just a politician but an activist too with significant contributions in her fields
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:POLOUTCOMES||WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources provides almost no coverage of her, they just mention her name which is trivial coverage. Currently fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NPOL)

Comment: The article fails ,  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:ANYBIO||WP:GNG)