Deletion of Popular cat names (2nd nomination)

Comment: It will be impossible to overcome the problems the list has without resorting to |original research and |synthesis. It isnt thre job of wikipedia to be an aggregator of other peoples lists. Special:Contributions/81.106.133.151|81.106.133.151
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:SYNTHESIS)

Comment: the |sources look good enough for the Wikimedia world.  Actually, it may be just the job of Wikipedia to aggregate other's notable lists.  The ''raison d'etre'' of Wikipedia is to be a source where even Merriam-Webster dare not tred (although "roofie" is in there, too).   That's why students, or biggest set of reasers, look to us first in their research paths
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)