Deletion of Black Dot Vodka

Comment: its vodka, so in-depth analysis in the New York Times is unlikely. The best we can hope for is that it might be profiled in a ''food & drink'' section of such a paper and for that to happen, it probably needs to have been around for a bit longer. There are some well-known blogs that have covered it, like http://www.drinkhacker.com/2011/11/04/review-black-dot-vodka/ Drink Hacker and a few items in industry publications like http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/sb/barbusiness_20110102/index.php?startid=14 Bar Business Magazine. So there's significant coverage in blogs and the like but not much by way of coverage in reliable sources. ? Either way, I can't support keeping this at the moment
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Unless more content or a stronger argument can be made towards its notability, I find most of the coverage un of the mill|run of the mill in what you would expect of a wide commercial vodka but nothing that particularly stands out
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Redirect (WP:R)