Deletion of Creston Davis

Comment: David Eppstein’s analysis is right on target, but I should say that the subject is a co-author/editor of two books by prestigious university publishers, one by Duke University Press and the other by MIT Press. The most widely held is in 268 libraries worldwide according to WorldCat, and the second in 153 libraries. The article was create a bit early, and the subject is almost sure to pass  notability criteria in the near future. I wonder if we could do anything to make it clear to academic bio article creators that waiting a little bit (often 1 or 2 years would be enough) would significantly enhance the chances of certain bio articles (like this) being kept. The flip side, unfortunately, is that creating articles too early frequently leads to embarrassment for the subjects of the articles, as the comments posted in these AfD discussions are often “brutal”. I heard of at least one recent case in which an AfD discussion, like this one, was printed and used in a tenure committee meeting discussion; needless to say, ''against'' the applicant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: He seems to have an active academic career but I see no evidence that his research has yet had the impact needed to pass  #1, I don't think his editing rises to the level of  #8, and he clearly doesn't pass any of the other  criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)