Deletion of Emilia Appelqvist

Comment: Passes . Article could use expansion, not deletion. Here's a few more citations to add to the existing five already establishing notability: http://www.kuriren.nu/nyheter/default.aspx?articleid=6873577 1,  http://www.uefa.com/womensunder19/news/newsid=847251.html 2, http://m.fifa.com/u20womensworldcup/teams/team=1888599/profile.html 3
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: appears to meet the minimum standards of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: on the balance) - the womens' lists are incomplete on the  - so top level league and hovering around national selection to national team is enough for me
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: fails  (no significant coverage) and  (has not played in a |fully-professional league or at senior international level
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL||WP:FPL)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: I would like to say 'Keep' but cannot simply as I don't see enough that passes WP:GNG. Have to agree though that women's football is let down by  and agree more appropriate wording is needed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: Per GNG: this coverage is beyond . I think it's about time women's football articles got their own, more appropriate, notability criteria on here to prevent these types of nominations in future. I know the  lads generally mean well, but in most cases what they know about women's football would comfortably fit on the back of a postage stamp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE||WP:FOOTY)