Deletion of Maglor

Comment: WP:NEXIST and . Considering that both Maglor and Maedhros play an important role in the fate of the Silmarils, this article could certainly be improved from its current state. There are plenty of non-Internet sources available discussing Tolkein's work in scholarly fashion. I say "weak", however, because I'm not sure if the sons of Fëanor are really that notable independently
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ARTN)

Comment: to House of Finwë#House of Fëanor or perhaps to List of Middle-earth Elves. As with Curufin, basic facts of this character are obviously verifiable in primary and secondary refs, so per  and , deletion is inappropriate if there is a viable target. House of Finwë#House of Fëanor  seems the best, as it gives the fictional family context
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE||WP:ATD)

Comment: Opinions above only assert the existence of relevant sources, but do not cite them, and therefore should be discounted. No indication in the article of the sort of third-party coverage required for notability. Contains only in-universe content, contrary to , another indication of non-notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:WAF)

Comment: GScholar hits show significant attention to this character, as do GBook hits and popular commentary. There may be Tolkien cruft in need of pruning, but this cookie-cutter nomination with evidence of compliance with  falls far, far short of making a credible case here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)