Deletion of Peter Harckham

Comment: Fails , and I don't think this coverage is sufficient to get him over the line of . He's quoted in Time Magazine, but is not the subject of the article; the rest is local coverage of varying degrees
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BIO)

Comment: Grossly promotional article ("Harckham has quickly compiled an array of legislative victories") for someone who, in the end, remains a non-notable county-level politician.  Being quoted in Time is nothing; an endless string of non-notable people are quoted all the time in news articles, it's how reporters write (cf. Man on the street).  Other than that I find a modicum of local news coverage but not the significant independent coverage it would take to establish someone as encyclopedically notable under  or |WP:POLICITICAN #2
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:POLITICIAN)