Deletion of Yulia Savicheva

Comment: per Valenciano, basically. Eurovision is divided into (usually) some form of national competition, followed by semi-finals and then a final. Being in the final suggests she won at least her home country's competition (or was simply appointed, as is the case for some countries, but that still generates coverage) then did well during the semis. To then place 11th in the final probably gets her over the line, in my view. Both the semis and finals are televised (outside of Europe, but obviously also within Europe) and many of the national competitions are televised too. The only question beyond that is whether her being a Eurovision contestant is a matter of  and whether that trumps  and the like. Given it doesn't trump other single-event, occupation-specific, criteria (like, say, ) suggests it shouldn't here. So on balance I find myself in the ''keep'' camp. But probably only just, based on . However, by all means '''merge''' the other ones into the "main" article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:NOLYMPICS||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: 19 Wikipedias have chosen to have a separate article on her, but they are either stubs or tagged with problems concerning its notability or with merging discussions and also one should not mention existence in , Natalia Podolskaya fails even more, as she is only known for representing Russia in a single edition. I think that Eurovision has spawned a lot of these instant celebrities articles within wikipedia, but only the most relevant should be covered, the rest should be covered into a single article with past editions and its participants
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERLANGS)

Comment: the main article per  and , specifically criteria 9:"Has won or placed in a major music competition." Participants in the Eurovision song contest are generally considered to be notable. She has also attracted coverage in major Russian newspapers, for example Vedomosti, http://www.vedomosti.ru/search/?=1&seachonlyarts=&order=date&s=%D1%E0%E2%E8%F7%E5%E2%E0%2C+%DE%EB%E8%FF here. The other articles should be merged into the main article for now, until independent notability can be demonstrated
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:MUSICBIO)

Comment: Anonymous voter, I disagree with the NNC reason for a keep argument, also availability in digital outlets doesn't represent a criteria for maintenance within WP, neither youtube, the link you provided lacks |in-depth coverage (no information on her, and no information regarding her albums), the same applies to other links (even the one that mention her performance on Eurovision). Even though we have limited material about her, it would be not a reason for deletion, but so far the only thing I see on the net about her is her performance on Eurovision which constitutes 1EVENT
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:INDEPTH)

Comment: per  &  - Article just isn't citing notability sufficiantly. Needs more work to cite this person's notability. Eurovision was a very early exposure in her career, as far as I can tell. She seems to be a highly successful commercial musician in the Russian language recording industry. Her albums are available through online marketers such as http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=a9_sc_1?rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Ajulia+savicheva&keywords=julia+savicheva Amazon:Julia Savicheva and Itunes, Yahoo! Music shows three albums, an MTV video and 25 Youtubes (http://music.yahoo.com/julia-savicheva/ http://music.yahoo.com/julia-savicheva/) I found through a cursory perusal of the web. She is only several years into her career, but has definite international exposure which has long exceeded this sole Eurovision citation. Special:Contributions/72.129.81.5|72.129.81.5
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NNC)