Deletion of NRL vs. AFL 2011 TV Ratings

Comment: Not an encyclopaedic topic, more suitable as an essay or on-going analysis. It seems unlikely that this will be demonstrably notable in its own right as a stand-alone topic and will continue to fail the  and  guidelines
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:IINFO)

Comment: as both |Original research by synthesis and as a |POV fork. There are recurring flame wars on Australian Rules and Rugby League forums about what sport is the most popular and this article is pretty clearly written by a participant in those wars. He gives the game away by calling the sport "AFL" instead of "Australian rules football" in the article, "''AFL is the name of both the sport played and the main domestic competition''" which is juicy flamebait. The creator of the article is also a contributor to List of Australian rules football incidents, an article that appears to have no purpose than baiting Australian rules football fans. The creating editor should be reminded that |Wikipedia is not a battleground and be advised that they should focus on improving Rugby league articles rather than writing very y articles about other codes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:POVFORK||WP:BATTLEGROUND||WP:POINT)