Deletion of GIK Institute Clock Tower

Comment: I'm seeing a moderate of coverage in RS. At first glance it seems it would pass . For the record, as
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The content seems thin but there's an obvious |alternative to deletion — merger into the main article about the campus.  We prefer to avoid deletion in such cases per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: as the article does not fail . It is notable as per #3 (which further states notability per GNG). The nominator also seems to lack policy related knowledge to much extent given that in violation of  lede, he reverted a prod template back in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GIK_Institute_Clock_Tower&action=history (telling me to wait till an admin decides to delete it? That's something for CSDs and that too for only the creator of an article). Coming back to the article, the subject is a real world land mark and wikipedia also acts as a guide for real places and keeps all articles related to real places, landmarks, roads, bridges etc as per #3. All real places are notable anyway. Just to further add in case the nom decides to object the place's existence http://www.giki.edu.pk/Campus/Buildings. Google Books search also seems to have https://www.google.com/search?q=gik+institute+clock+tower&client=ubuntu&hs=rck&channel=fs&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=oSmHVKrKH8fsUqzygogI&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&biw=1535&bih=803#channel=fs&tbm=bks&q=ghulam+ishaq+khan+institute+clock+tower 17 results and https://www.google.com/search?q=gik+institute+clock+tower&client=ubuntu&hs=rck&channel=fs&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=oSmHVKrKH8fsUqzygogI&ved=0CA4Q_AUoAQ&biw=1535&bih=803#channel=fs&tbm=bks&q=gik+institute+clock+tower 79 results for two different queries
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOFEAT||WP:GEOFEAT||WP:PROD||WP:GEOFEAT)