Deletion of Weinstein effect

Comment: Weinstein effect" is clearly defined as the reaction the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations. In fact, the article's title could be "''Reactions to the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse allegations''", since all of the articles cited frame recent the allegations as a reaction to the allegations against Weinstein (and if they don't they shouldn't be included). However, I think the title "''Weinstein effect''" fulfills , though I'd be open to alternatives
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:CONCISE)

Comment: The concept of a global reckoning against sexual assault/misconduct is clearly borne out in the sources that discuss the trend. When an article contains many examples, as this one does, many and most of the sources will only discuss the isolated case and not the trend, but there are close to a dozen sources in the article that discuss the overall trend. Many of these, including the first five cited sources specifically call this trend the "Weinstein effect", but I wrote this a month ago and as the event is still unfolding, the terminology may change, but that's a matter for talk page discussion, |not deletion. The article should be reverted back to Special:PermanentLink/809855746|its prose format, which was smarter and written about broad generalizations across industries rather than listing every single accusation, which was once compiled on Metoo and was eventually removed ostensibly for insurmountable lack of |BLP protections and because we are an encyclopedia, not a directory of allegations
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:BLP)