Deletion of Alanah Pearce

Comment: there is clear  notability based on multiple independent and reliable sources in the article providing in-depth coverage focused on her and her career; and per the nominator's statement above, #2d appears to apply
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SKCRIT)

Comment: Clear pass of , possibly a vexatious nomination
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It is referenced like a tank. Plenty of coverage to satisfy 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Profiles in major international news sources like ''The Guardian'' give her an easy pass of . One of nine likely bad-faith nominations in reaction to the deletion of the nominator's article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIDA Select
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: on a procedural basis. As noted by other editors, this article clearly meets . Looking at the nominator's talk page exchange with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)