Deletion of Opinion polling for the 2018 Italian general election

Comment: per  #3: {{tq|Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article.}} These statistics are too large to be placed within 2018 Italian general election so it should be in a separate article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: WP:NOTPAPER|Size isn't a make-or-break issue, and as argued just above, this is in keeping with |, point 3. Polling data is of enduring historical interest even after elections, such as in historical analysis about whether the polls were reliable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: The article does not contain only original sources, actually the majority of them are taken from other polls aggregators who list the polls taken from the pollsters. The fact that it is too long does not have anything to do with the deletion, probably only with a possible split or reduction. The article does not meet the deletion criteria, as per point 3 of , where the possibility of having aggregation of polls is specifically addressed. I agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)

Comment: because this does not meet -REASON|any of the reasons for deletion, and because this seems like a deliberate attempt to |game the system by trying to achieve through deletion what was not achieved through discussion and consensus at the proper talk page. There is absolutely no difference between this article and other similar opinion polling articles in the en.wiki, the only measurable reason brought for deletion being an obsession with the size of the article, which is not even close to a valid reasoning for deleting an article, and just because the nominator couldn't win their case through Talk:Opinion polling for the 2018 Italian general election#Tag "too long"|at the proper discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL||WP:GAME)

Comment: Wikipedia is not a site for data aggregation and drawing  conclusions from that data
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: Obviously fails  and the data is ephemeral too – we don't need polls and projections once we have the actual result
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTSTATS)