Deletion of Prinzzess

Comment: for reasons above. Also looks like a bad faith nom to me. Possibly nom did not read 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Ewwww.  And yes, less notable than another one recently seen at AfD.  It has only five hits in  http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?q=prinzzess&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&ned=uk&ie=UTF-8 two of them penthouse, two of them I think are press releases, the other something anyone can get in if they dressed outrageously enough that day
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Appears to pass , even if the article needs work. Without implying that this is a deliberately disruptive nomination, the nominator seems to be attempting to pursue some kind of scorched earth policy with regard to Ginger Jolie and is extending it to other Penthouse Pets
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)