Deletion of Organizational configuration

Comment: leaning towards delete.  This is actually the best or most promising of these project articles I've seen so far. It makes a bit of sense, and gives me a bit less of a headache trying to read it than the others do.  Under a title like management structure, parts of this might make for a worthwhile article.  But the opening sentence (''Today’s companies are faced with strategic tasks emerging from the international operating environment.'') all but shouts "I'm an unencyclopedic essay".  It also shows the sort of meaningless but grandiose text (Did ''yesterday's'' companies not face these "tasks"?  What makes them ''strategic''? ''emerging?'' What is an ''international operating environement?''  Do all companies really "face strategic tasks emerging from the international operating environment?"  What about Claire's Corner Copia?)  If I were the professor grading this, and someone handed in a paper filled with this kind of patter, I'd give it a D at best; then again the class I would be teaching would be "Expository Prose 101" and not "How to Bullshit|Talk like a Management Consultant". But there might be a good overview in this worth saving under a less |neologistic title
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEO)

Comment: per .  It ''is'' a bloody mess, but I can see how a decent article ''could'' be written about it.  Google searches won't be useful here, as the term is both too common and ''jargon
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BARE)

Comment: It seems quite easy to find substantial sources which discuss this topic in detail such as ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=K7bltdUMFasC&pg=PA210 The International Business Blueprint''.  If this draft needs improvement then our |editing policy is to improve by editing not to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT)