Deletion of Alternative explanations of the "grandmother" cell

Comment: Alternative explanations" in title of an article is never a good sign, and the content of this article doesn't inspire any more confidence. Lifted from |POVFORK: {{tq|However, a new article can be a POV fork even if its title is not a synonym of an existing article's title. If one has tried to include one's personal theory that heavier-than-air flight is impossible in an existing article about aviation, but the consensus of editors has rejected it as complete nonsense, that does not justify creating an article named "Unanswered questions about heavier-than-air flight" to expound the rejected personal theory.}} &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:POVFORK)

Comment: The content of this article is full of synthesis with references almost being a  for the unjustified conclusions drawn. I think it would be OK to copy/merge just the references per DannyS712, but the prose is not salvageable. --&#123;&#123;u&#124
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)