Deletion of Layton Utah Temple

Comment: We could move it to Proposed Layton Utah Temple for the nonce, and move it back to Layton Utah Temple after the dedication.  The fact is that all Mormon Temples can be sourced to meet .  There will be  coverage of the location, of the construction, of the pre-opening opportunity for non-Mormons to visit, of the dedication and of the Temple going forward - there always is. There is alreay local TV coverage of speculation about exactly where it will be located; the Mayor says that the Church has already bought the land and he knows where it is but he's not telling.  I have met Mormon temples before at AfD and, well, they can always be sourced, they just can.  It is simply more efficient to KEEP the article and let it grow along with the temple.  And it is better for the project to keep an article on a major church that people will expect us to have an article about
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS)

Comment: All sources are primary and article is . No prejudice on recreation in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)