Deletion of National icon

Comment: per the arguments several people (Biruitorul, Dahn, Delicious carbuncle, Ragib & others) have given for deleting this 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: Per . The selection seems completely subjective in most cases, and these choices as icons are not official
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as AfD is not the spot to discuss  of parts or sections or entries in the article. Take that to its talk page after a proper keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Cleanup (WP:CLEANUP)

Comment: no recommendation for now) - First we need to look at the term "national icon" to make sure we're not getting into |original research by using it to refer to these buildings/statues/landmarks. I suspect that the term ''might'' be ok (See http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/national_icons.html), but I'm not fully convinced. In any case, renaming the article to List of landmarks representative of their country or something similar would fix that.  Second, is this article supposed to be encyclopedic treatment of the topic "national icon", or is it a list of icons/landmarks/buildings?  Third, as a list, why limit it to one icon per nation? I think the UK is as much represented by the Tower Bridge or Stonehenge as it is by Big Ben. —&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: per . Sure, there are sources, but it's such a subjective subject. Editors will add new "icons" to the list, because they personally feel that those things are national icons. No-one will be able to remove them, because merely showing that there's a strong link with the country allows it to remain
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)