Deletion of List of fictional characters who can alter probability

Comment: I really hate all of these types of articles, which do everything except explain why a character is on the list.  I suppose that I could click on the blue link to see what's so special about "Amos Fortune", but the only reason I would want to look at a list is to be able to see similarities and differences.  It's original synthesis, badly done, with the authors filtering out anything that might be remotely of interest to anyone who might consult it, so I can see other things I can say beyond .  I'd compare it to creating a list of the fifty American states and the only information about the state would be what time zones it's in, whether it's east or west, whether its flat or mountainous, and whether it's small, medium or large.  Yawn.  Clearly, people have worked hard on it and might even try to improve it, but for the most part, these are all boring and useless
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: topic just fundamentally disagrees with Wikipedia and it's not a question of fixing it. Unencyclopedic cross-categorization as per . There is nowhere except Wikipedia where this is covered which makes this . I'm not trying to insult anyone's work when I even say this should be a '''snowball delete''' and I'm sure there's a website out there somewhere that this could be saved by a transwiki
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:OR)

Comment: Most, if not all, of those #DIR|lists are just repositories of loosely associated topics based on a trivial cross-categorizations. They are also horrendous :File:Train wreck at Montparnasse 1895.jpg|train wrecks of |original research and many of the entries on those lists don't even have stand-alone articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOR)

Comment: As with the others of this ilk, it is purely  and cross-categorizations that violate  and . It isn't part of an encyclopedic topic, and how exactly do you define "alter probability"?  The crossing of fictional character X with ability Y is a trivial, non-encycopedic bit of opinion that generally results in an overly broad as such a list is not realistically finite in number, truly definable, nor are they appropriate topic for a list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOTDIR||WP:TRIVIA)