Deletion of Corruption in Ghana

Comment: I am not motivated to research and write an article on Corruption in Ghana, but if somebody else is, they might prefer a clean page."'' "some one else should write a better article, because I am unwilling to do it" here and elsewhere,http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Colonel_Warden&diff=prev&oldid=348162985 is always a dubious argument. Well referenced article with major 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: The nomination is false in several respects.  I have today started editing the article and have rewritten the lede, working from a substantial source which testifies to the topic's notability, being a book about the topic which has been cited by numerous other sources which also cover the topic.  The claims of OR are not supported by any specific examples and the provision of numerous good sources in the article refutes this hand-waving assertion.  The nominator states clearly his personal unwillingness to work upon the topic and has declined the opportunity to discuss it in detail at the article's talk page.  As he does not wish to work upon the topic, it seems disruptive to obstruct editors who do so wish to improve the article in accordance with our |policy.  The cited justifications of Wikipedia:Delete the junk and Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over are neither policies nor guidelines and are directly refuted by our actual editing policy which is to |preserve such material for further work.  There is thus not the slightest reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:IMPERFECT||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: The article has been tagged for concerns, but these can and should be addressed |through regular editing as the article offers a tremendous wealth of sourced and sourcable information that helps readers gain an understanding of the subject.  And while yes, it could use inline or section citations and copyedit to address many concerns... |that no one has yet done it is, with respects, an invalid criteria for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NOEFFORT)