Deletion of Robert Multrare

Comment: The nominator has clearly stated his opinion that the subject of the article, Robert Multrare, does not meet the |General notability guideline.  The standard required by this guideline is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". I have been searching for relevant sources and have found two which appear to be both reliable and independent. Firstly http://www.jstor.org/stable/27575081 this article, and secondly https://archive.org/details/moutrayofseafiel1902ruvi this book. Both are genealogical accounts of the Moultrie family, and both note that this person received a charter of land in Edinburgh in 1365. Nothing else about this person is noted, it is not even claimed that he is an ancestor of the Moultrie family. Based on these sources it seems that Robert Multrare cannot be considered a historically significant person. There may of course be offline sources, and if so then these can be added to the article. It is more likely that a viable article can be written about the Moultrie family in general, in which Robert Multrare can be mentioned. Thanks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: In response to the 5 points listed by the page creator and expanded on above: 1. Literally thousands of individuals have been granted royal charters over the centuries, even in the 14th century (not the 12th). Consider a volume such as https://archive.org/details/registrummagnisi02scot (look in the index for list of names). Points 2-4 seem to reinforce my suggestion that a better article can be written about the Moultrie family in general, in which Robert Multrare can be mentioned (this approach is also supported by WP guidelines which have been pasted above). 5. Further research will always pay off, but as The Banner says above, you are |speculating about the reasons for the grant. Unless you can turn up some evidence which the cited authors overlooked, its not likely that the article can be expanded with any information about the subject. Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: There is no clear claim of notability. It is also not clear whether the intended topic is the individual named, the various family and place names linked to, or some bigger topic related to Scottish society or culture (as the Categories suggest). It is probably best to 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:STARTOVER)