Deletion of Martino Lupini

Comment: The deletion proposal is based on personal and unqualified opinion about dr Lupini's academic achievements and arbitrary interpretation of the  criteria. As to the dr. Lupini's academic achievements we can read from https://www.uregina.ca/external/communications/feature-stories/current/2018/02-28.html Rising star in mathematics world featured in inaugural lecture series: "Dr. Martino Lupini from CalTech University who is producing “exciting and cutting edge mathematics” will speak at the inaugural H.N. Gupta Memorial Lecture March 2 at the U of R"; " Lupini is considered a rising star in the mathematics world.". As to the , its Criterion 2 is arbitrarily interpreted since it's not visible from this criterion how profound research results in the mathematics foundations demonstrated in someone's dissertation could be put on the same academic level as the IMO or the Putnam competition results of the secondary school and undergraduate students. In addition, at many universities worldwide the graduate studies are those leading to the MSc degree, the PhD studies are not considered as the graduate ones, rather above of the graduate ones. Therefore the Criterion 2 of the  is unclear and imprecise and nowhere regarding the PhD dissertation disqualified as not notable.Dr. Lupini's academic achievements are far above those listed by Nsk92 and Epstein which can be seen http://www.lupini.org here: Research papers and preprints in Combinatorics, Dynamycal Systems, Operator Algebras, Functional Analysis and Model Theory. There are two books published by the world renown Springer Verlag. Then there is a long list of Invited Talks.The Google h index cannot be taken seriously as a measure of the serious academic credentials and achievements since h-high in such fields like the fixed point or the inequalities cannot be ever superimposed to h-low index of a serious researcher in the mathematics foundations. At the end, the ASL is not an institution supporting talented secondary school or undergraduate students - rather "an international organization supporting research and critical studies in logic. Its primary function is to provide an effective forum for the presentation, publication, and critical discussion of scholarly work in this area of inquiry.". Therefore the   https://aslonline.org/asl-information/prizes-and-awards/sacks-prize-recipients/ Sacks Prize is about "stunning results", "results that stand out",  "a deep and sustained study", etc. - i.e. not a student level award as Nsk92 stated above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON. It's always problematic evaluating researchers in pure mathematics because our most commonly used metric, citations, works so badly in this field, but with only an entry-level faculty position and best-dissertation awards to go on we have no evidence of |academic notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Setting aside citations as generally unilluminating for pure mathematics, all we have is a couple awards that might merit a mention but aren't enough to confer wiki-notability, and a pair of (co-authored) books that haven't yet earned the recognition necessary to meet . (A PhD thesis ''can'' contain great work, but if it's the kind of accomplishment that would confer wiki-notability, then it would receive recognition above and beyond awards https://aslonline.org/asl-information/prizes-and-awards/ explicitly devoted to student work.) Unspecific praise in a press release counts for nothing. I'd suggest draftifying, but the possibility of sockpuppetry rules that out (we shouldn't preserve content that is eligible for |speedy deletion). Nor is there any indication that his work has poked out into publications like ''Quanta'' which generally do a decent job at writing about mathematics in a popular or semi-popular way
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:G5)