Deletion of Boléro in popular culture

Comment: as per #DIR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per #DIR as with so many of these terrible "this one time in this one TV show they played this song" lists
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: as cites to its cultural importance could be found with a bit of effort.  I know I must |assume good faith, but the nominator appears to be making a |point about lists ''in general'' rather than sticking with the facts about this one.  This article has two cites, and thus is ''not technically'' unreferenced. (There goes that damn lawyer again.)  I agree it needs a slimfast diet
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:POINT)

Comment: as a collection of #INFO|indiscriminate information.  Every minor reference to Boléro is game in this bloated, trivial list which happens to lack sources, and by "sources" I mean reliable, third party sources.  Like 99% of all other ...in popular culture articles, this one is unencyclopedic.  All stupendous uses of Boléro may be merged into the main article, but from a quick glance I do not see any that deserve it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)