Deletion of Blue Collar Special

Comment: No third party sources, no releases on a major label or notable indie label, no chart presence. One track on a game soundrack is not enough on its own to meet . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND)

Comment: I don't think I have this many |socks in my top drawer. I noted the sockpuppetry possibility back on the 10th, but now it's getting pretty obvious
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry (WP:SOCK)

Comment: We appreciate your hard work. The concern isn't that your page is spam or that the band doesn't exist, but that the band just isn't |notable. I personally don't read the notability page to say that a song on a compilation or soundtrack makes a band inherently notable, which seems to be the disconnect. Also, a band's website itself probably isn't a |reliable source in the sense that we're using it - we're asking for things like newspaper articles or reviews. It's possible that I'm wrong about the notability criterion, in which case the closing administrator will opt not to delete the article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:RS)

Comment: It may well be difficult, but |Wikipedia is not for advertising or spreading the word. It's meant to cover things that are ''already'' well-known
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Can't find any evidence of notability, searched Google and Google News and only found self-published sites and gig listings. Fans of this band, if you want the article kept then please find articles about the band in newspapers, magazines etc and post links here to demonstrate |notability. Will happily change my opinion if you can do so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)