Deletion of Coronavirus party

Comment: I see no evidence in the weak sourcing that this is a clearly defined concept. We seem to have an article that's about any virus held during the pandemic which people are connecting to the pandemic (in the theme, in the advertising, in the range of motivations, etc.). It's a party to get coronavirus, in spite of coronavirus, themed after coronavirus, marketed by mentioning coronavirus, etc. Not a notable topic, and we have ''loads'' of other places where it could be mentioned if it ''were'' a well-defined subject per . Would also support turning into a disambiguation page pointing to either ignorance or sociopathy.. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOPAGE)

Comment: per . One isolated incident that got a blip of media attention. These idiots' 19 minutes of fame are up. Pox party is something entirely different
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)

Comment: One source about a Coronavirus party in Kentucky where participants apparently thumbed their noses at the disease: however the article makes it seem like these parties are widespread...yet I cannot find RS to back up this claim - . The other source in the article is about careful party goers with masks ostensibly trying not to catch the virus. A search reveals no other Coronavirus parties. Perhaps  or never. It remains to be seen if Coronavirus parties will be . For now the Kentucky party is  - and that not a reason to have an article. I am willing to change my !vote if other evidence is found
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:LASTING||WP:WIDESPREAD)

Comment: Tough. The term is used all around the world (https://tvn24.pl/polska/koroanwirus-w-polsce-koronaparty-jak-mozna-sie-bawic-w-czasie-epidemii-4353571 Poland). But is it a notable term yet? I am worried this is right now just a  + examples of use. We are not Urban Dictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF)

Comment: if these were intentional gatherings intended to spread herd immunity against the virus, a redirect to Pox party would be appropriate. But they're not – they're stupid and misguided acts of civil disobedience that put participants and thousands of others at risk. The few sources provided here don't lend themselves to covering this as a discrete topic, and as such this article fails |GNG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)