Deletion of List of Jewish United States Supreme Court justices

Comment: IZAK, please |assume good faith.Far from trying to pre-empt or counteract consensus, I was trying facilitate the emerging consensus by removing the concern that the info would be lost; I was explicit at CFD about what I had done, and the first objection to it being listified is your objection today at CfD. I have no particular interest in this list either way other than that someone thought the information was useful, and since many other CfDs have prompted the useful creation of a list, I thought that I would take the time to do so in this case.My understanding of the nature of a CFD debate is different to yours: not that the data is "inappropriate information", but that it inappropriate ''for the category system'' ... a position which I supported in this case (which makes a nonsense of your suggestion that I was trying to counteract consensus). As you may be aware, the deletion criteria for categories are diferent from those for lists, so in common with many other categories which are deleted, I thought that intended purpose of the category could be preseved as a list.Now, apart from your rather heated allegation of bad faith, can you suggest any AfD criteria by which this list should be deleted? The only guideline you cite is , which realtes to ''categorisation'', not to lists. Please remember the difference between a list and a category. And do, please read 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:OCAT||WP:AGF)