Deletion of Assault Weapons Ban of 2013

Comment: LB created this article. LB ALSO chose the scope of this article, including 23 executive orders by Obama, including alternate proposals by the NRA, including state law changes, including polling about gun control. In her most recent revision after the kerfuffle, she has removed most of that. '''redirect''' to Gun control after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting or Federal_assault_weapons_ban#Efforts_to_renew_the_ban or Reactions_to_the_Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting as all of this content is intrinsically linked, and keeping it by itself is an unneeded , and the extra hangers on (AWB + the bits that LB likes) is   that fails . It was a symbolic gesture during the aftermath of the shooting. That is the context it belongs in. Since the resounding vote against it, it has gained nary a peep in the news and fails the  except as part of the shooting - As part of the shooting or gun control reactions to the article, it should recieve  coverage as one of the significant parts of that event (which it does do, in the Gun control after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting article, which consists of content almost '''entirely written by LB''' just in an order she doesn't like and with a different  (See this revision, prior to ALL of my edits, that contains almost all of the "expanded article" content https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gun_control_after_the_Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting&oldid=604313540) . Also, since there was ongoing discussion about this dispute, including collaboration on an RFC which LB requested, forking this article is a failure of  and should be speedily deleted under A10 as it is an exact subset of the other article written by LB
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CFORK||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:OR||WP:NPOV||WP:10YT||WP:DUE||WP:TITLE||WP:GAME)

Comment: I am the editor who created the article. I started it just three days ago. While I was out to lunch today, two editors decided to rename http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gun_control_after_the_Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting&diff=604343295&oldid=604342918 and reorganize http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gun_control_after_the_Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting&diff=604345544&oldid=604323271 it, which may be Wiki "legal," but I hope it's not considered . I gave numerous reasons on the talk page about ''why'' the topic is worthy of its own article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGun_control_after_the_Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting&diff=604359518&oldid=604355479 (notably  and WP:SIGCOV), and I gave suggestions http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGun_control_after_the_Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting&diff=604361883&oldid=604361554 for the two other editors about ''how'' and ''where'' to appropriately share their Sandy Hook shooting related material
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL||WP:GNG)