Deletion of Fibonacci numbers in popular culture (2nd nomination)

Comment: per  never being a valid reason for deletion, plus clear http://stats.grok.se/en/200805/Fibonacci%20numbers%20in%20popular%20culture reader interest, and consistent with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSCRUFT)

Comment: indiscriminate. I would support an article based on scholarly sources that collate and find patterns in the use of Fibonacci numbers in popular culture. As it is, we don't have any information, just data, and the article is an attractive nuisance — inexperienced editors see articles like this one, think of some similar trivia they know of firsthand, and just pile it on, regardless of how encyclopedic it is or how much |original research their additions are
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)