Deletion of Tank Aces

Comment: and redirect to "Panzer ace" in popular culture as an unneeded & POV  and/or recreation of Panzer ace moved at a recent AfD. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German tank aces. Sample content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: but''... This is a mess, and I don't just mean the article under discussion. Clearly, ''this'' article is a content fork of the "Panzer ace" in popular culture|other article. I hate to speculate on editor motives, but I'd presume that it was created out of an objection to the "in popular culture" retitling over there, and that's understandable. Frankly, I think that editorial decision was... unhelpful (and not entirely accurate; the 1943 Hoo Hsien-Chung reference is not really a "popular culture" reference). The handful of legitimate historical issues aside, we don't name articles like that one is named, even for primarily-cultural topics. If this were entirely up to me, I'd delete Tank Aces as a content fork and move "Panzer ace" in popular culture back to Panzer ace (because that's clearly the  in preference to Tank ace, which should redirect). The article's ''content'' makes it clear that the concept is largely an ahistorical romanticization of WWII tank combat; we |don't need to use the title as a brute-force instrument to make that point. However, I strongly suspect that were anyone to unilaterally make those moves, it would evoke some discontent. A discussion at |requested moves or an outright RFC on the article naming is probably wise. In any case, the version ''currently'' under discussion here at AFD, is duplicative and inferior, and we delete content forks
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME||WP:NPOV||WP:RM)