Deletion of Sonya Curry

Comment: ESPN, The New York Times, NBC, Fox, The Washington Post, CBS, Bleacher Report, San Francisco Chronicle, The Mercury News, USA Today, etc. |beg to differ. For page not even 2 weeks old evidently 80,000 people have been interested in her because of the ridiculous amount of media attention she gets. (Yet for some reason Julia Lennon is a "Good Article" (with two banned sources) and what did she do besides... give birth and then die? She surely wasn’t getting interviewed every week. Lady Gaga|I have to laugh
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Meets  with significant coverage in multiple sources, esp. sources where she is also in the headline. Yes, she has famous sons (and husband), but the coverage is mainly on her, as opposed to her being a passing mention as someone's mother or wife. For those that are still borderline,  on the fact that she has been a popular TV crowd shot since 2008; readers want to know about her (even if you might not agree with why).  Julia Lennon (mentioned above) is a fair comparison, whatever side you are on
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:IAR)

Comment: per , but '''Note''' that in fact we KEEP plenty of pages mothers notable primarily for being "mother of..." a famous person, or 2 or 3 famous  persons . c.f. not only  Mary Washington and just about every other Presidential Mom, but  Esther Wojcicki, Italia Coppola, Kay Robertson, Catherine Scorsese.  Should we have a Category
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The Julia Lennon references are  and really shouldn't be taken into account here. That said, I agree we shouldn't have an article on her, either. Nominate it and I'll vote for deletion.&mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS)

Comment: Even though a strict interpretation of  might suggest her own accomplishments do not merit an article of her own, the sheer number of interviews and the compelling stories that go beyond her family makes her notable, even if it is in part due to the extreme fame of Stephen Curry in particular. It is difficult to underestimate the global popularity of the NBA. Without a doubt she is famous and people will come to Wikipedia to learn more about her. The article seems to be well-sourced. It would be a shame and rather strange, to parse out information in this article to subsections of her sons and/or husband. So, all-in-all, it's a rather strong 'keep' from me. Cheers
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIOFAMILY)