Deletion of Jordan Schaul (2nd nomination)

Comment: Nothing in the article looks like it would confer inherent notability; in particular, the OC Zoo is pretty minor as zoos go, so even if his position there was the head of the zoo (I can't tell from the title and there is no sourcing for more than the title) it wouldn't be enough by itself. Therefore, we need to rely on , but as LaMona's careful analysis makes clear, we don't have enough reliable in-depth independent coverage of him (only one local newspaper) to pass that criterion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The cited sources don't meet  and I didn't find any other sources that would help to meet that standard. The piece in ''Cleveland Jewish News'' isn't enough on its own to meet GNG, and the other sources are either brief/insignificant mentions or pieces written by Schaul. I also don't see anything that meets a subject-specific notability guideline like  or .  lists the circumstances under which self-published sources may be used in an article, but those sources don't help to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:JOURNALIST||WP:BLPSPS)