Deletion of Meredith Jones (author)

Comment: per #C7 or  based on XOR&#39;easter and David Epstein's votes/comments above. If not kept, this article should be partially merged/redirected to her wikinotable book Skintight: An Anatomy of Cosmetic Surgery
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: She has a plausible case for  through the reviews of her books (that I just added to the article) and a stronger case for #C7 as, seemingly, the world's leading academic scholar of the Kardashians. You may argue, as https://books.google.com/books?id=uz1bDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT225 Glen Wright's book does, that scholarship on this topic is "silly", but she has attracted significant popular-media attention for it (which is why I put it down as #C7 not #C1). The nominator's "It only get coverage because of" argument is irrelevant; if it got coverage, it's notable. Incidentally, re #C1, don't even try to make sense of https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=jTPSObcAAAAJ her Google Scholar profile, as it appears to be hopelessly muddled with works by other people with similar names
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)

Comment: per #1, demonstrated by {{U|EdChem}}'s excellent work on the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: per #C7 and plausibly , as argued just above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Being quoted a couple of times in relation to what seems like a tabloid story-of-the-day and a http://cmc-centre.com/kardashian/ one-day symposium publicity stunt in the wake of Jenner's gender transformation, does not equate to "substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity". Read Jones' damage control in the  https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/jan/14/whats-wrong-with-studying-the-kardashians Guardian article and she even points out that the whole thing "came under attack, especially on Twitter and other online forums". Note that no one is quoting Jones anytime in 2016-2019 about the Kardashians. No way does that support a claim to #C7 (the "Neil deGrasse Tyson" rule). Does not satisfy  due to writing only one book, and a few articles promoting said publicity stunt. Other books have her in the role of editor, and not even top-billing.  Gotta ask why the two "academics" voting above me are trying to  this one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:MASK)