Deletion of Florentin Smarandache

Comment: This is painful. What can we say about this guy in accordance with ? Not much I'm afraid. We do know Smaranadache is an associate professor at a two year college in New Mexico. He got promoted recently (from assistant prof!).  He writes a lot, and with a few exceptions, publishes most of it in vanity presses and most of it is trivial, wrong or a rehash of known stuff. He styles himself a painter. Is this notability in the style of Archimedes Plutonium? I don't think so.'''Delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: A search of Amazon.com for Smarandache comes up with 182 books, many of them not written by him. When you can get a dozen authors--W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, Linfan Mao, Mladen Vassilev-Missana; Krassimir Atanassov, Amarnath Murthy and Charles Ashbacher, Yi Yuan and Kang Xiaouyu, Howard Iseri, Sebastián Martín Ruiz, Ion Soare, and Wenpeng Zhang--to write books with your name in the title, you're notable. As for verifiability, Thompson Gale's Contemporary Authors series--which should be neutral, and available in most major academic libraries--has an article on him, which is available standalone from Amazon for six bucks. I'm getting a strong feeling that people are confusing dislike of the person with notability. I don't know much about the guy, but even if his works were insipid cultic trash, getting this many people from around the world to write about his work, plus the biography in Contemporary Authors, makes him notable. P.S. Can we avoid the preemptive attack on all who would vote to keep this article? It runs into  area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF)

Comment: it should be very weak!), there is some borderline notability there but Wikipedia is to be an ancyclopedia not a collection of autobiographies, which is why we have , it should be written neutrally as in ,it should include multiple neutral sources as in  and should be independently verifiable as in , autobiographies are generally neither of the above and  I better stop writing or I'll be swinging to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Autobiography (WP:AUTO||WP:NPOV||WP:BIO||WP:V)

Comment: article fails the  test and other tests on . I don't know that he is well-known for "unmotivated axiomatics and base-specific number theory". That seems like quite the stretch
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO)