Deletion of Sepideh Gholian

Comment: Notable labour activist/journalist/political-prisoner. Has fawiki entry (with quite a bit of Persian language sources). Has quite a bit of English coverage as evident even in a cursory google news search.  not an issue as she's imprisoned for political charges and since she is a  via her outspoken activism (that got her arrested
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLPCRIME||WP:PUBLICFIGURE)

Comment: Article neither fails notability and nor erifiability|Verifiability and my examination reveals no item in violation of copy right in the article. All items are carefully sourced and the subject falls within the domain of notability defined in Wikipedia. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: I also noticed this article because of the ANI report as Simon did.  Looking at the article, the sources already cited are more than sufficient to pass .  I see no reason to delete this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Among persian source, https://en.radiofarda.com/a/iran-labor-leader-bakhshi-torture-reports/29630095.html Radio Farda had stressed on this topic while the Verifiability of source is disputed! We have to consider that Sepideh Gholian is not notable, factors of Wikipedia:Notability (people) isn't true about her. Maybe she was notable for only one event (Haft Tappeh workers protest). So there is no need to devote 3 article to Ali Nejati, Esmail Bakhshi and Sepideh Gholian.According to , Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTPROPAGANDA)