Deletion of Ragnarok Wisdom

Comment: While the article may intrinsically fall under , as may several other listed webcomics, it contributes to both the List of webcomics (which is, in its own manner, a directory) -- and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics|Webcomics Wikiproject, should the article meet the requirements for a meritable one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: I'm fairly certain that sources exist that would make this article pass . I personally don't know them, but I encourage anyone who does to add them to the main article now. Once the article passes , any claims of notability are nullified and this article will survive AFD
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB||WP:WEB)

Comment: This article was not created by the comic creator, thus is not advertising under . Also, same reason as Torte
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: The links you provided are of fansites, which are not |reliable sources because they are self-published by fans.  Reliable sources are things like newspapers and magazines
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Perhaps you should read Wikipedia:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability.  There is no such thing as "average scale" of notability.  An article is notable, or it isn't.  Have you read ?  Use that, and not this "average scale" theory that you made up, to make your argument
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)