Deletion of Patrick Schöffski

Comment: WoS concurs with GS, with a citation list of 331, 260, 232, .... (h-index 36, "National Academy" territory, according to h-index|Hirsch) and MS-academic shows http://www.journalogy.net/Author/23576269/patrick-schoffski >1000 total citations. It is true that those of us who lurk here regularly have a roughly consensus view of the commonly-used test  #1: either having solved individual high-profile problems (like ones that have their own WP pages) ''or'' having a general body of research that is highly cited ''collectively'', i.e. hundreds of citations or a bibliometric indicator of such, e.g. h-index of at least 10 to 15. There is a subtle context regarding  here in that, even if no other sources ''about'' a subject can be found, the published papers themselves have enough  to at least stub an article, e.g. place of employment, title, professional area, etc. &ndash; this caveat is in the "notes" of . Schöffski very obviously passes the notability test. In cases like this, it is not uncommon for nom to withdraw the AfD, so that it can be closed quickly
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:V||WP:V||WP:PROF)

Comment: Clear pass of rof#C1 with a GS h-index of 30. Please will nominator carry out  before making further nominations in this area
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P||WP:before)