Deletion of The Superfuzz

Comment: Errr ... "no citations?"  I followed the several citations listed at the bottom of the article (and there at the time of the nomination), and as much as it sticks in my craw to say so about an unsigned band without releases, they check out.  Several are to reliable sources which go indepth about the band, as  requires.  That they might not clear  is trumped by the inescapable fact that they clear .  The article is certainly promotional in style and a bit of a mess, but that's a content dispute inappropriate for AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:MUSIC||WP:V)

Comment: I feel they meet #C1 for http://www.mumbaimirror.com/net/mmpaper.aspx?page=knowmumbai&section=Leisure&sectname=Leisure&subpage=article&sectid=20&contentid=200705302332219372258373e&pageno=1 this, http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mp/2007/07/26/stories/2007072660050200.htm this, and http://www.jammag.com/etc/etcshow.php?art_id=349 this. Possibly  #C7 too, but that one would be a stretch
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC||WP:MUSIC)