Deletion of Lava Bear Films

Comment: the two Variety articles and the Hollywood Reporter article demonstrate notability to me. They are not primarily about Linde the CEO, they are about the setting up of the company and the announcement of its first film project. There is some element of promotional text about the current version of the article and it is clearly being edited by Linde himself, so there are  issues. But these aren't enough to warrant deletion, IMHO. The company is sufficiently notable. I spent some time a month or so ago, ensuring the related David Linde article was properly sourced. At the time I took a look at Lava Bear Films and decided it was notable and I don't see anything to change my mind. Best
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Significant coverage in reliable sources demonstrates it satisfies . I https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lava_Bear_Films&diff=467943217&oldid=465856404 linked some more coverage in the article. The article definitely needs work but deletion is unwarranted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)