Deletion of Chris Ferry

Comment: likely |paid-for spam given the refbombing. No comment on a repost speedy deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:UPE)

Comment: This is proof just "having plenty of sources" does not advance otability|notability and that an article can be sourced, implying  notability, while landing in the middle of hat Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not. If a subject is not notable then no amount of |"stacked on sourcing will make it more notable". This is certainly true when source titles like ''"New Jersey brothers rent billboard to prank dad on birthday"'' are evident and certainly if many sources are |promotional, giving the article a clear advertising tone. Many people world-wide would be considered "Addiction Recovery Advocate's", there are too many "Entrepreneur's" in the world, and a surplus of internet personality's (content creator) to try to make inclusion to include "the whole world". A source indicates the subject was an "insurance agent" that kicked the habit, with an in between OTYELLOW|co-founding of an insurance company and starting a rehab business, but there are many thousands of such inspiring stories which do not rise to deserving an encyclopedia article. The billboard stunt dominates sources that is a "birthday stunt", posted on OTSOCIALNETWORK|facebook. The OTTEMPORARY|temporary "fame" of the billboard stunt coupled with employment of prdistribution.com. to facilitate a "marketing" strategy, along with clear |general news reporting is good promotion but also does not translate to encyclopedia notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:W||WP:REFBOMB||WP:PROMO||WP:NOTYELLOW||WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK||WP:NOTTEMPORARY||WP:PRESSRELEASE)