Deletion of Tarek Dergoul

Comment: Article's subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Subject has received mention in multiple non-primary |reliable sources, that being said it could be argued that the subject has not received |significant coverage in those mentions, it can be also argued that those multiple mentions if taken in total can add up to significant coverage. All that being said, I can see the short rational of this AfD that the subject is primarily notable for one event, that is his detention at Guantanamo Bay detention camp, therefore the subject falls under . As there is an article about those who fall within the same category of detention at Guantanamo Bay, the article content that can be verified to non-primary reliable sources should be merged into an appropriate target article, and a redirect left in this article space. As for the present state of the article, it appears to be a / do to its external links
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:BLP1E||WP:SOAPBOX||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: although mentioned in RS the subject spears to lack "significant coverage" and is therefore not notable under  regardless of long lists of his "claims" as presented above and regardless of the worthiness or otherwise people might ascribe to them being presented in mainstream media. Wikipedia is not Amnesty International. What little of value in this article is rightly already covered in numerous articles on the subject of Guantanamo Bay and the issues which surround it. No need for the subject to have his own article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom and per RightCowLeftCoast - this person's only potential notability is for one event so  applies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)