Deletion of Promenades Drummondville

Comment: Per . This is a Regional Shopping Center per the definition http://www.allbusiness.com/glossaries/regional-shopping-center/4965203-1.html here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: I suspect the only way this will be kept is if someone actually does the work to source it even if all the sources are local. Claims that sources exist is not proof that sources exist.  applies to larger malls which at least meet .  While it is open to debate if this is a "larger" mall, at this point it does not meet  because it has not been shown that sources exist
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:OUTCOMES||WP:V||WP:V)

Comment: Another non-notable mall.  Specifically, fails  because I can't find any reliable, independent, secondary sources to demonstrate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: the issue here is , not its size.  In its current condition, it fails .  If it is bought to , then I would say '''Keep'''.   is based on size (500,000 appears to be reasonable), but it is only a reason for keeping, not a reason for deletion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:OUTCOMES)

Comment: mdash; The main policy and guideline-based arguments given to delete are |failure to meet general notability (WP:N / ). Arguments over its size are irrelevant unless secondary sources can |verify the notability thereof (). Furthermore, |common outcomes at AfD () is a descriptive essay of what someone, in their |original research or |personal opinion thinks happens or happened at some point in AfD history&mdash;it is '''not''' a consensus-backed |policy or |guideline. On top of the issue of , the article in its current form is a #DIR|directory entry, and, failing a clear assertion of and verification of |reliably-sourced notability, it is also in violation of that policy, too. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) is also '''not''' a policy or guideline yet. On top of all of that, we don't take our hints of what's notable from a glossary section on "allbusiness.com," nor do I personally believe we should start to. Ever
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:V||WP:OUTCOMES||WP:OR||WP:ESSAY||WP:LOP||WP:LGL||WP:NOT||WP:RS)