Deletion of Doug Bell (2nd nomination)

Comment: per : "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." This person played a major role in creating the Dungeon Master (video game) series, have a look at that article for a list of articles and reviews on what he created
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: These dice are loaded! But seriously, see my point further up. His credits are |verifiable, verifiability does not have a requirement for non-triviality. That's |notability, which he passes according to  point 3
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: The current article gives us verifiable information about what he has developed and published. He should have an article according to  point 3, overriding the general notability guideline
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: Best boys and gaffers aren't major contributors, so they wouldn't meet  point 3
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: You seem to be conflating  and . His credits are |verifiable, non-trivial coverage is not required for verifiability. He is |notable according to  point 3, so should have an article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:N||WP:V||WP:N||WP:CREATIVE)