Deletion of Jean Carlos Chera

Comment: YouTube is not a source as per Wiki policy (ditto blog sites, and self promotional Ghits). Wiki is |not for crystal balling
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: What "known fact?"  There is not a single source cited in the entire article.  I am particularly leery of this becoming another AFD where the article is kept because of references cited in the AFD discussion that never make it into the article thus defeating the entire purpose of this discussion and 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: miserably fails , as well as |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOT)

Comment: the point is that he doesn't meet . There are thousands of kids with potential; they get articles here when that potential is realised by playing for the first team of a significant club. WP is not a crystal ball
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: I've reviewed some of these news articles. I can read only the English ones, which are basically the same novelty one-shot story, repeated, or something like the USA today story, which is more about how everyone is famous on the Internet than a biographical source for an article. Doesn't meet the thrust of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per . http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Jean+Carlos+Chera%22&btnG=Search+Archives&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Google News Archive search yields 74 unique hits- more than enough to qualify as "the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person." How old the subject is and the method in which he was made notable isn't relevant; the subject meets 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:BIO)