Deletion of Appolena

Comment: A couple other AfDs I've voted in I've voted !keep because there were references in other works such as scholarly articles. This is based off a single directory listing in an atlas. I cannot find any other references to it online. Other articles were easy to find sources for. I have no doubt the atlas gets this near , but we can't have a standalone on it right now. That being said, this needs to be listified somewhere. I don't know where that place is, so I'm a delete - if anyone suggests a good spot for it, I fully support that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Presumably Barrington got its information from somewhere and there must be more to find.  The policies ,  and  indicate that we should keep this for further development rather than deleting it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Appearing in an atlas is not sufficient to establish notability per , and populated places aren't presumed notable simply because they exist. This goes double for a place whose existence is merely inferred
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NGEO)

Comment: Hardly seems notable. While there isn't a "WP:DELETEALLSTUBS", there is a  and keeping this would make it exactly that. Same goes for the other articles about Roman inhabited towns that lack proper sourcing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: My reading of the referenceshttp://assets.press.princeton.edu/B_ATLAS/BATL062_.pdf#page=3 differs a bit from that of {{u|P Aculeius}}. 'Tezkalesi' does appear in the index for https://www.google.com/books/edition/Phrygien_und_Pisidien/nzwXAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Tezkalesi&dq=Tezkalesi TIB: 7 Based on page 402 and his own unpublished information Drew-Bear gives 'Appolena' for the name. We should be concerned with the place, not the name. It's appropriate content for some article, we just don't know enough right now to say where that content should be so i think  applies
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)