Deletion of Taije Silverman

Comment: The relevant standard here is , not WP:PROF; she's a poet, not a scholar of poetry.  The most likely criterion is awards, and   I see no awards of any sort except student awards. Fellowship for bing a poet in residence are not awards in the usual sense. In terms of her single book, it hard to judge poets by the extent of copies of the book, but it is her first and only book.  There seem to be no formal published reviews. The praise from Natasha Tretheway is not a published review, but a blurb quoted in a blog posting advertising a bookstore appearance. This seems a clear case of Not Yet Notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: That is an extremely distinguished list of publications, I mean, extremely selective literary journals have published a great many of her poems.  This is what constitutes notability for a contemporary American poet. Plus the distinction of the University where she teaches, far more competitive to get that gig than most literary prizes.  I think that the sum of her career puts her past 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CREATIVE)

Comment: She's certainly an accomplished individual, and yet there is as yet nothing to help us say that she in any way meets  in terms of reviews or ''major'' awards. That is often the problem: Wikipedia has well-established benchmarks for notability, and many talented people may still fall short. As for the Fullbright, according to its wiki article approximately 8000 people receive a scholarship of some kind annually. I don't believe this would qualify as "a well-known and significant award or honor" for our purposes. Again, not that it is ''in''significant
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)