Deletion of Kasey Wells

Comment: fails  and article reads like |campaign literature
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:PROMO)

Comment: I'm just not seeing enough coverage of this person to pass  or . Of the current 22 sources in the article 15 are primary listings that confirm he stood as a write in candidate, 2 are state/citywide news coverage of a 'elephant as a running mate' publicity stunt and 5 are super local newspapers (consisting of 2 more mentions of the publicity stunt and 3 pieces on how a local is running for president). The article appears to have been written as a promotional biography to support his run for president, one of the two major contributors is a single purpose account that has written about nothing else and claims the selfie used in the article as 'own work'. The current article consists almost entirely of quotes from the subject. Searching online turned up social media, user generated content and primary sources, but nothing that would demonstrate notability. Special:Contributions/192.76.8.81|192.76.8.81
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: per nom - fails , 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: Easy call. Not 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTEWORTHY)

Comment: per . In a Presidential election, or for that matter, ''any'' election, there will be write-ins. For example, there were 711 write-ins for over 500 candidates in the 2019 New York City Public Advocate special election. Short of a winning write-in candidacy, I don't recall ever having an article on any such candidate. Ping me if I'm wrong
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL)