Deletion of Cymbal (app) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Meets  as per coverage in http://www.forbes.com/sites/denalitietjen/2015/07/29/cymbal/#47fc7cdd392a Forbes (also see http://www.forbes.com/sites/denalitietjen/2015/07/29/cymbal/2/#45fdac7e2280 page 2 of the Forbes article), https://www.cnet.com/news/cymbal-music-app/ CNET, https://noisey.vice.com/en_ca/article/6895y3/teen-time-cymbal-app-review Vice, http://www.digitaltrends.com/music/cymbal-wants-to-be-the-social-media-platform-for-sharing-music/ Digital Trends, http://www.techtimes.com/articles/72922/20150730/is-cymbal-the-instagram-for-music.htm Tech Times and http://www.notizie.it/cymbal-social-network-musicisti/ Notizie. Of note is that the Forbes article is written by a staff writer for Forbes, not a contributor. Also, topic notability is not based upon an application's Alexa rank
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: as a  page on an unremarkable application / startup company. I don't see much coverage beyond launch / funding publicity. Has not achieved anything significant just yet, apart from raising $1M from investors. The amount also suggests lack of significance
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: For the same reasons outlined in the first AfD; there are enough sources with reasonable depth to meet  (Forbes, DigitalTrends, etc
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)