Deletion of Mitchel P. Goldman

Comment: per . He probably meets #C1 (not through quantity of pubs but through high citation counts) but the pay-for-play issue makes me disinclined to let him get any amount of promotion for his dollars. Better just to delete it and wait until someone without a conflict of interest cares enough to create a properly neutral article. (Or blow it up again, if he tries to promote himself this way again
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:PROF)

Comment: Meets notability because of extensive publications. But  for sure
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)