Deletion of Sarasota News Leader

Comment: I deleted the prank issue material as non-noteworthy and |coatracky
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Coatrack articles (WP:COATRACK)

Comment: No evidence of notability. The "spoof" section needs to be removed since it concerns a very ephemeral incident with no encyclopedic significance (until independent  sources say otherwise). The rest of the article describes a "news and commentary source" that is available for free on a website or by email—there are thousands of such "news" letters, and no reason to believe this one is notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SECONDARY)

Comment: Fails . There are only two sources for the Sarasota News Leader topic and they both are at http://www.yourobserver.com/news/sarasota/Front-Page/0816201221293/E-news-outlet-targets-the-Pelican-Press-with-fake- the same link
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Coatrack or not, the subject lacks general notability. At best this is  which is still not good enough either
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: It is a wordpress blog that has been online for 2 months.  If standard are going to be dropped to 2 month old blogs where does it end? Wikipedia:Up and coming next big thing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: Google News search turns up zip. Perhaps 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)