Deletion of Ipsita Pati

Comment: In fact, the user name has been challenged as that of a real person.  If the user is Ipsita Pati, then it is an autobiography, and there is nothing wrong with her name, only with the |conflict of interest.  If the user is someone else, then it isn't an autobiography, but they have to change their user name
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI)

Comment: Meets . Sources are cited in the article. {{ping|Robert McClenon}} I guess, your concerns has been addressed. Although it initially gave an impression of autobio, I'm inclined to believe that is not the case. It seems like a fan created this page (https://www.facebook.com/ipsitapatiprincess/photos/a.374190769339730.88356.294905793934895/1083633181728815/?type=3&theater, https://www.facebook.com/ipsitapatiprincess/photos/a.374190769339730.88356.294905793934895/1083632348395565/?type=3&theater, https://www.facebook.com/ipsitapatiprincess/photos/a.374190769339730.88356.294905793934895/1083632181728915/?type=3&theater, one can find more such instances https://www.facebook.com/ipsitapatiprincess here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It either is an autobiography, or someone is using the subject's name.  (It is surprisingly common for a new editor to use the name of a real person because they conflate an article name with a user name.)  The only real question is whether |general notability guidelines are met.  If the community thinks that they are met, we can keep.  Not all autobiographies have to be deleted
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)