Deletion of Rosemarie Allen

Comment: Passes  and cademics, She meets the criteria #5 of cademics
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC||WP:A||WP:A)

Comment: per  and . I'm not convinced that she meets any part of PROF, and we rarely keep ''associate'' professors. Her Ted Talk and other media visibility bumps her over the line
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BARE)

Comment: As {{u|David Eppstein}} and {{u|Russ Woodroofe}} have argued,  is not met, but there's just enough for 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)

Comment: Not enough for  but enough for asic as enough coverage shown in the Essence and Chalkbeat refs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:B)

Comment: I think this actually passes criterion #4 of cademics as "she has worked with the United States Department of Education and 48 State Departments of Education."  Her weekly TV gig might not be enough to meet ntertainer, however along with other things, it could be a plus to have that for notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:E)