Deletion of Continental Flight 61

Comment: as WP is |not a collection of news reports. Yes, this has had a lot of coverage, but is a minor incident in the context of ''notable flights''; it wasn't an accident, but simply a death on board (albeit quite a significant one). Also, it's very much http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31426550/ns/travel-news/ not the first time it's happened. It merits an entry on Continental Airlines's article (which I see it already has), but this article doesn't have enough substance to stand on its own
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: This article was created under a string of recentism when this was on the news. Now that this story has had it's 15 minutes, no one is reporting on this anymore. This is different from AF447 when it was on the news for weeks, so don't try equating these two articles. This is #NEWS pure and simple
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: We seem to get an article on every minor aviation incident.  Many of these need to be deleted.  Many others need to be summarised and merged elsewhere.  I get fed up with these minor incidents appearing in AFD lists.  
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: People die on the job all the time.  A pilot dying during a flight is not notable. It is a  event which fails . Cooks die in restaurants during the dinner shift.  Ditch diggers die in mid dig. Truck drivers die between Iowa City and Chicago. Authors die while typing chapter 3. Professors die while lecturing on Aristotle. Fails  and . There is no inherent notability of  news stories which involve aviation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS||WP:BLP1E||WP:NOTNEWS)