Deletion of Jiong

Comment: It is a descriptive article about languages which is acceptable under 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: it just should be expanded as Zanhe said.  states that it should ''include information on the social or historical significance of the term.'' This is very much doable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WORDISSUBJECT)

Comment: plenty of Chinese language reliable sources, such as http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20151001/19316346 this article by Apple Daily and http://news.dayoo.com/finance/200808/30/53869_4021118.htm this by Southern Metropolis Daily. Try to search for native-language sources  nominating for AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)