Deletion of Michael Yeung Ming-cheung controversies

Comment: to  Michael Yeung Ming-cheung in drastically-reduced form.  This article has serious BLP issues as noted above and many of the "controversies" are either mere statements of Catholic doctrine, rumors, or actually statements made by his predecessor in the position.  Pointing to Pat Robertson is a  argument and not relevant.  Even if it were, Robertson is Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP_controversy_pages|easily distinguished from Bishop Yeung
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: no comment on actual content. Splitting off a controversy section on an article that short was absolutely unnecessary and violates BLP. The content itself doesn't (at least at first blush), but just calling it out by itself in a separate article is extremely poor form and should not be done unless  necessitates it. So merge the content back with history, and then delete this, as the redirect is not helpful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SIZE)