Deletion of List of people with major depressive disorder

Comment: Per nom. a vague subject that violates 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: The fact that the page is utterly distasteful |is not a valid reason to remove it: but the fact that it's explicitly vague in its remit ("Some historical personalities are presumed to have had depression"), questionably-sourced and, per nom, inherently prone to breaching BLP guidelines, combined with the fact that it doesn't seem to serve any useful function, are all valid reasons to get rid of it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: we have plenty of :Category:Lists of people by medical condition and this would seem to be a significant one because of the substantial impact it can have on people's lives. The nominator and commenters above seem to assume that this is inherently negative, or done as an attack page ("distasteful", "tabloid fodder", etc.), but this reads like . That assumption also seems ironically ignorant of the fact that this information has been increasingly published in reliable sources about notable people (and through self-disclosure by many such subjects) in order to counter the stigma attached to mental health issues. The utility of such a list is in providing examples of those with relevant experiences of the list topic, and that provides readers opportunities to research any further ( should fit in  somewhere). Every entry is sourced. If there are issues with a particular entry then examine those specifically rather than the s we see above to BLP. You don't get to delete something by throwing out dismissive, drive-by opinions that are clearly less based in actual work, research, and review of the content and cited sources than what the editors have put into it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:IJUSTDONTGETIT||WP:ATAIDD||WP:VAGUEWAVE)