Deletion of Tsinghua University Cultural Revolution records:The memoir of a Red Guards leader

Comment: No !vote from me, but I do agree that the ''event'' is more |notable than the ''book''. An article on the actual event would be more suited towards Wikipedia. Readers don't want to know about a ''book'' written about a real-life event by reading an ''article'' about a ''book'' about an ''event'', they want to read about the event itself. To me, this event resembles that of Battle Royale and readers may find it quite interesting, however BR is a fictional novel (which is why an article on the book exists) whilst this book is based on a real-life event (and so the standard of  is not the same). However, regarding the original nom, there is nothing wrong with using Chinese references as per ONENG. It is permitted to use Chinese-language sources if English-language sources are either not available or not of equal or superior quality, hence  and  have been satisfactorily fulfilled as per Wikipedia's requirements. And finally, Arilang, weren't you supposed to take a short break from Wikipedia
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:N||WP:NONENG||WP:RS||WP:V)