Deletion of Rydberg matter

Comment: A cursory examination of the 44 references indicates that the topic has been discussed in secondary sources. The alleged neutrality issues stemming from  can be solved by editing. Did anyone notice it's ing in here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SNOW)

Comment: None of the issues above are such that cannot be solved with editing, and for |deletion policy this means the article can be kept. Yes, there are COI issues and it looks more like the work of a single research group, yet it doesn't make it non-notable, nor it seems fringe research, given the sheer amont of peer-reviewed papers on the subject. Also it seems Prof.Holmlid is not the only one to acknowledge the thing -see http://scholar.google.it/scholar?hl=it&q=%22rydberg+matter%22+-holmlid&btnG=Cerca&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 a search of "rydberg matter" -holmlid on Gscholar. For sure the article needs help, but AfD is not the way to go -better to bring it to the attention of Wikiproject Physics, if it hasn't already been done, for example
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)