Deletion of Sequel trilogy (Star Wars)

Comment: to Star Wars without a redirect, then delete.  Granted that Lucas has indeed spoken about a third trilogy (thusly, I'm for merging some of this information), but he's waffled about it and has not only not put it into production, he's in fact made clear his current intentions of going no further.  Despite his reputation for changing his mind in this regard, all of this pretty much makes this article speculative and |crystalballery.  The root article would be a better home for discussing this in some brief, unless somebody at Lucasfilm actually does something
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: As stated above the article begins by saying this is a "rumor".  That sources exist for a rumor do not make it any less speculative.  Wikipedia is not a rumor mill.  To all the folks saying "Look, it has sources!  Sources = not OR!", may I remind you of ?  That Lucas may have originally written the saga in 9 (or 12) episodes may or may not be the case, but it has become abundantly clear by his own mouth that the 6 now released encompass the entirety of his story.  There are no plans to film a sequel, and again, Lucas has expressly made this clear.  The bits about having written more stories in the past may or may not be important to the history of the development of the Star Wars theme, and if so can be mentioned elsewhere.  How anyone can argue to keep an article that, according to the people in a position to decide, will never exist, is baffling to me
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: all appropriate discussion to ''Star Wars''.  It is |crystal balling to create an article on this subject, which has no real-world context (where there is supposed to be one, as opposed to abstract topics like world peace on Wikipedia).  Discussion about the film should be preserved, but needs to be referenced inline better and fall under a broader topic, in this case, ''Star Wars''.  When this trilogy is actually produced, and there are no signs of that at the present, then this would warrant its own article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Well-sourced articles may still be inappropriate for Wikipedia per 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Well sourced, not original research at all, contains important historical information about Lucas's plans for the film series and how it changed over the years.  That Lucas originally said there would be nine stories in the series is widely reported and hence notable.  That such films will probably not be produced (at least in the near future) does not make the article any less valid.  Meets the tests suggested by  for valid articles discussing speculative events
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: needs some rewriting, not much though. Very well referenced too, all quotes are sourced, and there appears to be no blatant speculation and wishful thinking. I generally accept that unless a movie is in production there shouldn't be an article, but this has been speculated and mentioned for 30 years, and is surely notable as a phenomenon if not actual produced films - it's not guessing dates and actors as  violations usually do, nor does it seem to be under any illusions that a sequel trilogy will actually be made
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: this is |original research via synthesis. Perhaps http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Wookiepedia wants it; if so, it should be transwikied; if not, then it's probably not worth keeping
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)