Deletion of Sun-Kyung Cho

Comment: Per , all arguments for deletion are based on subjective reasons. All the information comes from Time magazine New York Times, and others prime sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Per reasons in the essay . She is a private person and not notable, except for a relative who was notorious, like Hitler's sister
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: Her notability is established well past the level for . She is the '''subject''', not just the source of multiple, independent reliable sources (see talk page). Her prominence and 'rising star' career has been http://www.sundayherald.com/analysis/analysis/display.var.1346565.0.0.php described as a contributing factor in her brother's psychological make-up. Her success as the daughter of immigrants has been http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3053725&page=1 contrasted with the difficulties face by her brother. In addition, her eloquence has helped the world to sympathize with her family's predicament
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: without prejudice to recreation should she become notable in the future. We'd have to be awfully careful not to contravene  here, and to be honest I don't think she's notable enough in her own right ''yet'' that we should bother. Notability generally takes some time to develop; most people don't become notable overnight. We all know examples of relatives of killers or other criminals that have had a few minutes' attention only to slide back into their preferred obscurity. A few minutes' attention isn't enough to prove notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: per other delete comments. This article is pure |recentism -- she was mentioned in every newspaper published today but that does not mean that she will continue to be the subject of public interest in the future. As a remote second choice, redirect and merge to the article about her notorious brother, who ''is'' likely to be the subject of public interest in the future
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENT)

Comment: Well, according to Wikipedia's definition of notable at  and  she's clearly notable.  But that says more about what a mind-numbingly awful guideline notability is than it says about the appopriateness of this article
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:NOTE)