Deletion of Paul Fincham

Comment: the person gets non-trivial coverage http://camdennewjournal.com/article/the-city-worker-who-changed-his-tune 1, and has won an award (Film Fest International) for Best Original Score "A Reason to Leave" https://www.filmfestinternational.com/london-iff-2017-winners/ 2. Composers are known for their work and this one passes . Person passes WP:N with coverage in RSs. The nomination rationale sstaes that if we allow this article: {{tq|we would be cluttered very quickly.}}...but we are . The rest of the nomination reads like 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPOSER||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: passes  as he wrote a piece for the London Philharmonic Choir, a notable performance group, so should be included in my view
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:COMPOSER)

Comment: the sources contain one interview, which is a good start, but the rest of the sources are all namedrops, self-published, or dead links- which is not so good. I haven't been able to find anything better: most hits I get are for different people named Paul Fincham, including a soldier who I think may have a better claim to notability than the composer. I don't think this is a "vanity" project, or that it's trying to mooch notability off his brother, and I think the subject is not far off meeting what I consider a good standard for notability (certainly |verifiability is not an issue) so I would be open to reconsidering if other sources turn up
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)