Deletion of List of nicknames used by Donald Trump (2nd nomination)

Comment: per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: per  and  /  concerns. Just because he has tweeted these things does not mean we need a whole Wikipedia article cataloging them. Most of these are hardly "nicknames" anyway. They're just insults. &ndash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:RECENTISM||WP:10YT)

Comment: Per . While the fact that he uses derogatory nicknames might be notable, a precise list of them is not Wikipedia material. This list suggests that the act of giving negative nicknames to people is somehow new or original
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Easily passes  and  with ample coverage in reliable sources - for instance https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-most-disparaging-nicknames-of-2018-2018-12, https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/president-trump-nicknames-political-rivals-article-1.3506694, https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-team-workshopping-nicknames-for-2020-democratic-candidates-report, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/everything-trump-has-said-about-2020-field-insults-all-n998556, https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3050369/why-hasnt-trump-coined-nasty-nickname-pete, https://www.newsweek.com/trump-r-rated-nicknames-west-wing-anonymous-book-warning-1472962, https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trump_buttigieg_neuman_nickname.php, https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trump_buttigieg_neuman_nickname.php, http://english.alarabiya.net/en/features/2020/03/02/Crooked-Crazy-Crying-Trump-s-top-nicknames-for-opponents.html, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-im-swearing-off-trumps-nicknames/2019/05/28/933f1c82-815e-11e9-95a9-e2c830afe24f_story.html, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-nickname_n_5d9aa6f1e4b0fc935edc80f7, https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-nicknames-centrist-senate-democrat-manchin-munchkin-in-wake-of-impeachment-2020-02-10, https://nj1015.com/little-bruce-a-list-of-trumps-many-nasty-nicknames-for-people/, https://psychcentral.com/blog/trumps-nicknames-and-the-psychology-of-bullying/, https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/421948-18-nicknames-trump-invented-in-2018, https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/saudi-aramco-s-ipo-trump-nicknames-secret-consumer-scores-sesame-street-turns-50-ev-batteries-and-more-1.5351327/shifty-schiff-and-sleepy-joe-the-strategy-behind-trump-s-political-nickname-game-1.5351397, and many, many, more that I don't feel like listing because I'd literally be adding citations all night long and I don't have time for that. Clearly notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:LISTN)

Comment: Sources as listed above satisfy GNG on Trump's use of nicknames. The article could however use some trimming/cleanup to remove all primary sources (Tweets, etc.), potentially only keeping entries that have independent commentary on them. We could look at this again after that occurs. The article got 297,210 pageviews in the last thirty days so deletion (or even a hard redirect) will cause significant disruption in terms of broken incoming external links etc. Some of the delete votes read as , well I also wish there was no need for this page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: but trim.  There's enough coverage of Trump's giving nicknames to people to pass  (in fact, it's been noted that that's a primary method of his).  However, this list stands inclusion criteria.  Entries such as names used long before Trump was even born, entries for people who don't have an article, and entries that can only be sourced to Trump's tweets should probably go.  I think there's a  pass here.  Also, if this one goes, then List of nicknames used by George W. Bush should go, too
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN||WP:LISTN)

Comment: I guess the tens of thousands of visits to the article say the article or list is relevant. A valid rational for keeping would be 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)