Deletion of Death of Aisling Symes

Comment: per ,  and , specifically {{Tq|Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance}}. I see "nothing further"; this event is not of enduring historical significance. Basically a local news story with a bit of speculative hype because it involved a missing child. Club
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE||WP:EVENTCRITERIA)

Comment: Generated coverage in 2009-2011, and even in 2017 - http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/332487/teen-s-death-in-drain-someone-s-got-to-take-responsibility. Alot of coverage. We decide notability of events (criminal or otherwise) based on '''coverage''' - not based on editor opinion of notability. The example in  is actually quite relevant - {{tq|"The disappearance of a person would fall under this guideline if law enforcement agencies deemed it likely to have been caused by criminal conduct, regardless of whether a perpetrator is identified or charged. If a matter is deemed notable, and to be a likely crime, the article should remain '''even if it is subsequently found that no crime occurred''' (e.g., the Runaway bride case) since that would not make the matter less notable."}}. In this case, there actually were lasting issues regarding maintenance of storm drains and other infrastructure safety related issues - estimated to cost quite a bit of money - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10732794
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCRIME)