Deletion of List of DC Comics characters who can fly

Comment: nbsp; Interesting concept, not an indiscriminant list.&nbsp; Not sure where it goes or how to organize it.&nbsp; Looks like the article was created from a category, no one here seems to be aware of the history of the page.&nbsp; This is part of a larger structure and needs to be looked at in its entire context.&nbsp; Most of the Delete positions are based on a flawed therStuffExists line.&nbsp; To the question, "should we create "List of DC Comics characters who can't fly"?" not sure, but perhaps this data should be a column in the existing List of DC characters.&nbsp; See also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 28#Category:DC Comics characters who can fly, it looks like there are categories of flying:See List_of_comic_book_superpowers#Flight.There are quite a few separate methods. Everything from shapeshifting into a creature which can fly, to telekinesis, to magic use, and beyond.And then there are all those characters which use an "object" in order to fly, such as a Legion flight belt/ring, a Green Lantern ring, Hawkman's wings (due to Nth metal), a broomstick, a jetpack, repulsor boots/discs, etc. (Noting that there is repeated past consensus to not categorise a character based upon some object they may have, since objects are not "inherent" to a character, as they may be transferred/lost/stolen/destroyed/etc.)At best, this should be a list so that the methods/modes for each character may be explained. (See also List of fictional characters who can fly - though it looks like it may need cleanup and expansion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O)

Comment: for the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who can fly. It's an unencyclopedic cross categorization in that the topic isn't covered directly by third-party sources. It's original research that |synthesizes a bunch of observations of some editors. Reasons for deletion are still sound today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: The list is non-encyclopedic, indiscriminate and trivial. As such, it does not meet the criteria of |appropriate topics for lists. It also falls into the criteria of what Wikipedia is not (|Wikipedia is not a directory
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:NOTDIR)