Deletion of Wavelet.biz

Comment: Not notable. Does not meet . Advertising
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Seems like a lot of the articles listed here to try and defend this article are now up for deletion. I think we need to intensively review (and perhaps even modify)  to come up with some sort of consensus concerning these small companies. And then, once that is done, go through each corporation page and either decide to keep it based on , or delete it so we don't have anymore "Well, if that company can stay, why can't this one!?" arguements
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Does not pass ,  or  at this point.  Nice that this 'war' is helping remove these NN company articles
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS||WP:CORP)

Comment: No evidence presented that it meets . Comparing it to other company/software articles on Wikipedia doesn't support notability; in fact, I see that a few of those mentioned have already been nominated for deletion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: 69 Ghits for http://www.google.com/search?as_q=malaysia&num=100&hl=en&btnG=Google Search&as_epq=Wavelet Solutions&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images suggests it's of local interest only.  Misses  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:VANITY)

Comment: Assuming it was |verifiable, this looks like it would be notable. I'm guessing it would probably pass  if our readers could speak languages of Southeast Asia. Since it's unverifiable right now for lack of English sources I vote delete, but we should allow recreation without prejudice if it gets verifiable (i.e., English) coverage that satisfied . &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:CORP)