Deletion of Tellurian Inc

Comment: Added the above sources mentioned, as well as some more. It needs a review and expansion, ideally from someone more knowledgeable about business news and/or the gas industry; I also worry that I overcompensated for the puffery that was there by skewing too negative. At any rate, though, it should now more than demonstrate that it meets 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I really am not sure what you are looking at because this company has been extensively covered in business publications, coverage that generally is not promotional -- quite the opposite, actually, they're not doing so well. Examples: recent coverage in the Financial Times (https://www.ft.com/content/824ce0f4-e014-48e5-80fb-95beede80398; googling site:ft.com "tellurian" brings up much more), Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-02/u-s-gas-exporter-tellurian-thrown-into-turmoil-amid-market-rout; again, site:bloomberg.com "tellurian" brings up a great deal of news). These seem analogous to "news article discussing a prolonged controversy regarding a corporate merger" per  (merger, no, prolonged controversy, yes) The company was also the subject of a lawsuit Bloomberg described as "a bitter, multiyear dispute between major players in the nascent U.S. gas-export industry" (https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/days-before-trial-of-the-year-gas-exporters-settle-feud -- this is about the end of it but there is plenty of coverage of the suit prior). The original creator of the article appears to be affiliated with the company, which would explain the omission of such sources given that they are unflattering; however, they exist, and seemingly en masse
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)