Deletion of Notae Elegantissimae

Comment: per . All the references appear to be both unreliable and copied from each other. Some of the claims in the article (particularly the one saying this is "commonly used" appear to be quite dubious. No reliable sources for this can be found; the two hits for this phrase in Google books appear to be unrelated, stemming from the fact that "notae elegantissimae" is a natural turn of phrase when writing in Latin
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: None of the sources appear to meet , claims of popularity appear to be a hoax
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The article's subject is verifiable and at the same time it is not original research. And it is clearly notable because a Google search for "Notae Elegantissimae" produces thousands of '''relevant''' results. Since it is not a biography, the  criterion does not apply here. And lastly the article has just been created. It would be better to improve the article (by finding and adding more sources) instead of deleting it. (And for this article, Google may not the best place to search for reliable sources. One should also look into books and libraries perhaps
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Vintelok is free to look for those sources.  |Wikipedia guidelines put the burden on the author to verify their articles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:PROVEIT)