Deletion of XQEMU

Comment: As much as I like seeing the emulation progress of various consoles (especially Yuzu, a Nintendo Switch emulator), there is no reliable sources that significantly covers this program, as the community pointed out, and so has to be deleted from article space. It might as well appear to be a case of . While I have no comments about the behavior of the article creator, I'll say this: you can always use  to userfy/draftify the deleted article in question so you can continue improving it, or have its source code sent to you by email
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:REFUND)

Comment: Fails .  Trivial mention in reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: u|Miserlou}} claims subject matter expertise and asserts that "XQEMU is a monumental achievement of software engineering" without offering a shred of evidence from reliable sources. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Instead, Miserlou attacks the nominator as a "serial hostile deletionist", which is a stunning failure to |assume good faith of fellow editors. |Verifiability is a core content policy, and poorly referenced articles need to be either improved within a week or deleted. Ranting against editors who work to enforce our core content policies is a losing strategy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Assume good faith (WP:AGF||WP:V)

Comment: the author mentions a number of other articles about emulators; quite apart from , a number of those have exactly the same problem as this one.  I don't see any reliable coverage on Xenia (emulator), PPSSPP, Nestopia, or VisualBoyAdvance, for example.  Others rely on a single RS (hardly major coverage).  Some (i.e. Dolphin (emulator), are well written. There's not a deletionist concept here, there's one that simply follows our policies on notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OSE)