Deletion of Khasako Dzugayev

Comment: Wikipedia editors are not the experts in trying to decide which claims are bogus and which are not. Given that the claim is repeated at least by the Gerontology Research Group on the basis of the International Committee on Supercentenarians http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/rej.2004.7.232, it can be considered |verified, unless you consider that they fall outside the bounds of |reliable sources. So I want to ask, why is a redirect not appropriate in this case? Thanks
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: The Soviet Union had numerous bogus persons who were supposed to be really old. Could this be one? "his age cannot be fully verified without knowing his exact date of death." Can his birth be verified, and can the person who was alive in his old age be proved to be the same person? Fails  due to lack of any references. Also fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:BIO||WP:N)