Deletion of Danny Wimmer Presents

Comment: I believe with established references from the New York Times, Sacramento Bee and Pollstar, notability is not what is now being questioned, but rather the correct sourcing, documentation and objectivity of the article. I would agree that it is a good idea to  this to be worked on until it is ready to be submitted to an administrator for approval. I want to work with the community to make sure content that is making it to article space is purely neutral and objective
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Userfication (WP:USERFY)

Comment: I agree Danny Wimmer should have been deleted, but the ''New York Times'', ''Sacramento Business Journal'' and ''Sacramento Bee'' sources that JSFarman linked to seem to establish notability for Danny Wimmer Presents per |GNG and |NCORP
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NCORP)