Deletion of List of Christian thinkers in science (2nd nomination)

Comment: So far, no one has mentioned the most relevant guideline, the |notability criteria for stand-alone lists: a list topic is considered notable if it is discussed ''as a group'' by independent reliable sources. I find no shortage of sources discussing it as a list, but are they reliable and independent? It's debatable. Here are some of the ones I found
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:LISTN)

Comment: The list is, per its lead, "limited to those scientists whose Christian beliefs or thoughts, in writing or speaking, are relevant ''to their notability''" (my italics). No, no, that's not a description of a "List of Christian thinkers in science": such a list ought, if anything, to be limited to those scientists whose Christian beliefs or thoughts are relevant to their notability ''as scientists''. Relevant to the science they did. The criteria offered are impossibly loose, and the texts introducing each period (does a list article normally have that much text?) are essay-like and completely POV. Delete per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: POV issues aside, I'm not seeing the unambiguous, objective, reliably sourced inclusion criteria required by . The lead even states that the "list's purpose is to act as a guide", which is |not what a list or any kind of article should be
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:STANDALONE||WP:NOT)