Deletion of Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (2nd nomination)

Comment: CIPFG is responsible for the torch relay as well as the investigation report from some time back makes it a notable organization.  It passes  by it and its efforts (ie the torch relay) being the primary subject of multiple sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Notable international organization per cites. Further, the nom was made only within 6 months of the previous one which is simply inappropriate.  This isn't a game of nominating articles until the decision goes your way. Not to mention the fact that the nom seems to be a |single purpose account bent on promoting pro-China POV and has shown absolutely no respect to the process of Wiki from the very end of the previous AfD by slyly attempting to redirect the article merely two weeks after his previous attempt at having the article deleted failedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=187191028&oldid=187190997.  She/he then reattempted this many more times after being warned http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=196217130&oldid=195509417 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=196279056&oldid=196251877 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=196292042&oldid=196289848 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=209637044&oldid=207576088 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=213896522&oldid=213571353 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coalition_to_Investigate_the_Persecution_of_Falun_Gong&diff=213902842&oldid=213899056.  This nomination is one giant violation of . The last time he did this, I brought the issue up at ANIhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive421#PCPP.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 which resulted in a 48hr block against PCPP by {{user|Blnguyen}}http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&user=Blnguyen.  When he realized that his efforts at unilaterally moving the article weren't going to fly, he decided to open up this AfD.  Moreover, many of the leaders of the organization are independent of the Falun Gong and are otherwise highly respected. For instance, the head of its Canadian branch is a highly influential Jewish Rabbi, Reuven Bulka who is the head of the Machzikei Hadas congregation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA||WP:POINT)

Comment: Citing from : "'''An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.'''". OK so here is an incomplete enumeration of independent secondary sources: Taipei Times http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/08/03/2003372469, Australian News http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20876865-1702,00.html, China Post http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/2007/08/11/117895/Taiwan-activists.htm, Hotpress http://www.hotpress.com/politics/frontlines/4153367.html, de Volkskrant http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article496061.ece/Op_naar_Peking,_zegt_de_ronde_tafel, Sports Ilustrated: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/more/08/09/bc.olympics.beijing.rights/, ESPN Deportes http://espndeportes.espn.go.com/news/story?id=585968&s=oli04&type=story, Handelsblatt http://www.handelsblatt.com/News/Sport/Sonstiges/_pv/grid_id/1504363/_p/300484/_t/ft/_b/1310307/default.aspx/leuchtendes-zeichen-fuer-die-menschenrechte.html,  Politics.be http://www.politics.be/persmededelingen/13135/, MyWire http://www.mywire.com/pubs/PRNewswire/2007/08/01/4129600?extID=10051, Radio Czechoslovakia http://www.radio.cz/fr/edition/95191, Scoop NZ http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0708/S00244.htm and more ... For example Romanian press does not even show up in google news while searching for CIPFG, here are a few examples: http://stiri.rol.ro/arhiva/content/view/393990/8/ http://www.e-juridic.ro/stiri/torta-drepturilor-omului-la-timisoara-1639.html http://www.radiolynx.ro/news.php?offset=40&id=2665 http://www.roportal.ro/stiri/stirea-893949.htm, these show up when you search like this: http://www.google.ro/search?hl=ro&q=coalitia+pentru+investigarea+persecutiei+Falun+Gong&btnG=C%C4%83utare+Google&meta=. So just as an analogy, if you look in French, German, Check, Polish, Asian, African, Oceanian, etc... media, you will find a lot of reference, because the human rights torch relay, organized by CIPFG actually went world wide, see: http://www.humanrightstorch.org/news/2008/04/20/video-global-human-rights-torch-relay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: I have thought about this. I think the large amount of coverage of the http://www.humanrightstorchrelay.org Human Rights Torch Relay (HRTR) and also the Kilgour-Matas organ harvesting report is enough to grant notability to this subject (CIPFG). CIPFG are the organisers of the relay. There have been thousands of news articles written about the HRTR and they all talk about CIPFG. There are many other news articles which also talk about other activities of CIPFG; "Human Rights Torch Relay" should be a subsection of this article. CIPFG also has notable members like Kilgour and Matas, and before they were members, is the organisation who asked them to do http://organharvestinvesetigation.net/ their report on organ harvesting, which has gained quite significant global media coverage. So I think this organisation has been behind several major human rights based public and media events. If it were not for the HRTR and the organ harvesting report, I would not suggest this organisation is notable enough to warrant an article. I think the difficulty at the moment is that no one has taken the trouble to build this article up, so it still looks like a stub. There is, however, plenty of information online, enough to qualify 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG)

Comment: Although persecution of FLG does exist, I believe that the article just has not received coverage from otability|multiple independent reliable sources. The Epoch Times is certainly not an independent source
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)