Deletion of Eggel (Egg Bagel)

Comment: I too thought the term was made up, but gNewspaper searches revealed mentions https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1350&dat=20070916&id=MnJPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=qAQEAAAAIBAJ&pg=3881,446854&hl=en from 2007 in the ''Toledo Blade''; https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1755&dat=19850207&id=_6EcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=72gEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5029,1974478&hl=en from 1985 in the ''Sarasota Herald-Tribune''; https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2519&dat=19800418&id=bB1eAAAAIBAJ&sjid=oF8NAAAAIBAJ&pg=4663,3300739&hl=en an advertisement from 18 April 1980 in the ''Observer-Reporter''; and, https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1917&dat=19890714&id=znEhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=W4gFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2397,3020438&hl=en from the Schectady Gazette of 14 July 1989. I wavered over posting this as a "weak keep" because these mentions are local newspaper restaurant reviews, one ad and/or even stretching toward "advertorials." But the timespan suggests this is a long-enduring dish and these examples of secondary source coverage seem to be sufficiently significant, taken as a whole, to establish notabililty per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Completely |made up with no |reliable sources  even http://www.urbandictionary.com/ (which is not considered a reliable source) doesn't even have an entry for this.  Besides Wikipedia is not a |Wikipedia is not a dictionary, phrasebook, or a slang, jargon or usage guide
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:MADEUP||WP:RS||WP:DICDEF)