Deletion of Chaoyangmen Outer Street

Comment: ping|gidonb}} I resent the implication that I had not done a BEFORE search. In fact, I managed to find ''two'' sources... about the half-marathon they ran near the road. If you want to adopt it and find sources, that's great, I'd support a draftify but unless there ''are'' significant sources, and someone points to them, it's unlikely that this be kept. I empathise with the people wanting to keep this, I really do, but I trust my own judgement (a terrible idea, I know) and I honestly can't find the sources. If anyone can suggest a good -M target, I'd be happy with that too, but frankly exclaiming that |there must be coverage isn't that convincing. On the other hand, if an argument is made for ''historical significance'', I would be inclined to strike my !vote
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD||WP:MUSTBESOURCES)

Comment: Only sources in the article are not significant coverage, fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND||WP:GNG)

Comment: More about the street can be found after breaking up the name into Chao Yang Men Outer Street or by looking for Chaoyangmen Dajie. Also looking in Chinese (simplified and traditional) helps establishing notability. In summary, this main route in Beijing easily passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)