Deletion of Hail Satan

Comment: AfD is not for cleanup.  states that "disputes over page content are not dealt with by deleting the page...deletion discussions that are really unresolved content disputes may be closed by an administrator, and referred to the talk page or other appropriate forum." If the lead-in needs fixing, then fix it. And, per , "if it is likely that independent sources could be found for a topic, deletion due to lack of notability is inappropriate unless active effort has been made to find these sources. For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DELETE||WP:N)

Comment: unless it can be shown that there is ''significant coverage'' in sources: the subject of the sources cited is not the phrase "Hail Satan", but rather other things like hip hop, a paranormal event, and "corrupting" music. Per , ''"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Article meets . A google search would show that. Also, we might be able to say '''keep''' via 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SNOW)

Comment: Easily passes  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:V)