Deletion of Climate change alarmism (2nd nomination)

Comment: The deletion arguments seem spurious.  is not an argument, especially not when several scholarly articles address the topic. There is certainly more than enough to merit . As for the POV-fork argument, i find that equally spurious, since Global warming controversy is already bloated, and has had to be plitting|split several times. Denialism is at the other end of the spectrum - so a POV fork from that it certainly isn't either
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:GOOGLEHITS||WP:GNG||WP:S)