Deletion of Commercial credit reporting

Comment: One simply has to click on the google books link above to see the great notability of this topic.  The nomination thus fails |our deletion policy.  The fact that the prod was contested should have been a good clue that the topic required further work and discussion before bringing it here.  The nominator has not engaged in discussion on the article's talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)

Comment: notable article, which has a lot of , but it appears to be in its early stages
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Potential, not just current state (WP:POTENTIAL)

Comment: Nobody is discussing if the article should be kept or deleted. Whether or not its userfied or "incubated" or whatever is not the point. I would get back to the nominator's concerns about the subject and the article being notable enough. I think something should be done with this information, either merged into an appropriate article or worked on so it meets oS. It also desperately needs sources. &ndash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M)