Deletion of Eric Mutua

Comment: Our |notability criteria for politicians do not include "ran in a nomination contest or primary and lost" — a person has to ''hold'' office, not just run for it, to be considered notable as a politician per se. But the claims of notability as a lawyer aren't automatic notability passes either — being chairman of the Law Society has potential, but it would still require more than just ''one'' piece of media coverage about his initial election to that role to clear  for it, such as some properly sourced ''substance'' about things he did ''in'' that role
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL||WP:GNG)

Comment: As per {{u|Bearcat}}. The subject of the article was not elected to parliament, and thus the article doesn't pass 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: Did anyone do a  here? There's tons of news coverage of this guy, and not just related to the election he lost. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2013/03/lsk-boss-in-trouble-with-supreme-court/ Here's an article about him being called to the Supreme Court in 2013. http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2012/02/lawyer-eric-mutua-takes-over-as-lsk-chairman/ Here's coverage of him starting his term as Chairman of the Law Society, and http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2016/03/23/lsks-eric-mutua-to-handover-to-new-president-isaac-okero_c1318494 here's coverage of him ending. http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2016/10/24/ex-lsk-chair-eric-mutua-claims-life-in-danger-wants-mwingi-cops-probed_c1442926 Here's another article focused on just him and his supporters. And those don't even include ones where he's just quoted. This is substantial coverage. Just because he happened to then lose an election does not mean he's non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)