Deletion of Epiphenomenon

Comment: Let's not rush to judgement here. The entry is distinctly dictionary-like, as is what you get if you Google the term. The example applications could help to rescue the article, but they are dangerously close to being  with 5 of 7 paragraphs without citations. If we can have some decent citations, listed here if not in the article itself, then I'd be persuaded to vote to keep: if not, we could send it to Wiktionary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)