Deletion of Banglastan (2nd nomination)

Comment: My observation is, this is a strong case of . The term ''Banglastan'' has not reportedly been used by prominent ''Islamist'' groups. However, some online and social media material can be found where critics attribute or impose use of this term to ''Islamist''s. The article is created and maintained by an editor, who has history of generating controversies and pushing POV and neologism. I wouldn't say this word doesn't exist, but at this point, this term doesn't warrant an entry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:neologism)

Comment: It means two things - (a) a journalistic rhetoric used sporadically, and (b) one post in a defunct facebook page. Neither clears 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)