Deletion of Sadie Bonnell

Comment: A DNB entry is a definite pass of . Always has been by long consensus. Likewise an obit in a newspaper of record
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per  #C3, per comments above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ANYBIO)

Comment: she passes  by virtue of ODNB entry and obituaries in national newspapers in my opinion. I've added details from ODNB - now available with a package of other resources with a few clicks via Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Databases which is superhandy. Thanks to nominator for proposal to delete, this article was in quite a shoddy condition before
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Absurd nomination given the ample evidence of notability.   is insufficient reason to reject first-class sources out of hand
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: fails  and . I don't accept the entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography is ''de facto'' evidence of notability argument. Also that's the only source given so no 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)