Deletion of Nathan Larson (politician)

Comment: When your nomination begins by explaining why the subject clearly meets , you better have just about the most compelling argument anyone has ever seen coming in hot right after that. Not seeing it here. We have articles on lots of infamous people. I've written a number of them myself, for example Randy Roth. The article doesn't say anything nice about him because he's known for being a terrible person. The other issues identified in the nomination can be fixed by editing
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: per . There are obvious content issues, but AFD is not the place to hash them out. This is a guy with multiple independent nontrivial mentions in the news media for a variety of incidents, and the ongoing criminal case only adds to that. Special:Contributions/69.174.144.79|69.174.144.79
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: plenty |reliable sources, and the subject meets notability. I don't know why this is at AfD in the first place, given the plethora of news sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)