Deletion of Berat Çetinkaya

Comment: The coverage of this person is in fact in-depth.  In regards to sports coverage,  states it is meant for "Wedding announcements, obituaries, '''sports scores''', crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine."  Of course the coverage is well beyond "sports scores" and therefore not "routine sports coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ROUTINE)

Comment: Fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)

Comment: The first source present in the article is a brief (less than 70 words) report of the subject's transfer from one club to another; it supplies his name, birth year, playing position, how many games he played for his previous relegated club, name of new club, and suggests interest from other clubs (unnamed) in signing him.  explanatory note 1 gives extreme examples of the different between in-depth and trivial coverage; the content of that first source is pretty close to the trivial end of that spectrum. Explanatory note 5 reminds us that as well as databases, announcements and the like, "minor news stories" are also among "examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined". The second source is an agency piece reproducing the club's formal stock-exchange announcement of the player's loan transfer, and is neither in-depth nor independent of the subject. Enough significant, non-trivial independent coverage of the subject to pass the general notability guideline may exist, but for a subject who doesn't pass the |relevant subject-specific notability guideline, its existence needs to be demonstrated. As yet, it hasn't. By the time the subject passes WP:NFOOTY, hopefully there'll be enough coverage to write an informative article about him. cheers
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NFOOTBALL)