Deletion of Larry Vardiman

Comment: Obviously, he's a  researcher, so we need mainstream coverage of him; citation circles of other creationists aren't going to count towards notability. But I found nontrivial coverage of Vardiman and his creationist work, from what appear to be reliably published sources following the mainstream scientific point of view, in Alters "A Content Analysis of the Institute for Creation Research's Institute on Scientific Creationism", ''Creation/Evolution'' https://ncse.ngo/files/pub/CEJ/pdfs/CEJ_37.pdf, Collins & Collins "Pleistocene continental Glaciers: A single Ice Age Following a Genesis Flood or multiple Ice Ages?", ''Reports of the NCSE'' http://scholarworks.csun.edu/handle/10211.2/3039, Heaton "Recent Developments in Young-Earth Creationist Geology", ''Science & Education'', {{doi|10.1007/s11191-008-9162-6}}, and Stix et al, "Science versus Antiscience?", ''Scientific American'', {{jstor|24993570}}. So he appears to have a plausible case for being notable for his fringe beliefs
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE)