Deletion of Snowbooks

Comment: NPOV issues can be dealt with, but this seems to have sufficient |verifiable notability to seemingly merit an article. Weak keep only because the sourcing is still anemic. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: According to |the essay you cited, "countering the keep or delete arguments of other people by simply referring them to this essay is not encouraged."  In other words, it's better to avoid "|the belittling redirect tag WP:ILIKEIT" if there is another way of expressing your point. -Fagles
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ATA||WP:BASH)

Comment: Important publisher for which there is not enough  material to write an |attributable article on the topic. Does not meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:A||WP:N)

Comment: fails , , and  —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned comment was added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP||WP:COI||WP:SPAM)