Deletion of Black Spark (2nd nomination)

Comment: It may or may not pass |WP:XXXBiographies, but it is very obvious that it passes , at the very least
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO||WP:GNG)

Comment: If "''the subject of the article is already a self-admitted sock-puppetteer''", I do not see anything indicating that this article was written by a banned or blocked editor, even if about one so purported. And no matter its topic, the point here here is that even if the topic is |disliked by some for various reasons, it appears to have received |enough coverage to be worthy of note.https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Black+Spark%22&tbm=nws&tbs=ar:1#hl=en&tbo=d&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Black+Spark%22+director+-wikipedia&oq=%22Black+Spark%22+director+-wikipedia&gs_l=serp.3...13541.16487.2.16804.11.11.0.0.0.0.133.1300.0j11.11.0...0.0...1c.1.Pto8UqSz-z4&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=99a1ab5eeb75a78a&bpcl=39650382&biw=1024&bih=653 Sources listed in article are not so much blogs, as they are reports in genre sources about reactions to this performing artist and his works and identity.  is met
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:GNG||WP:GNG)