Deletion of List of Cinco Family products

Comment: As stated above in the clearly cited policies and guidelines that this article clearly fails, it's unencyclopedic because it's indiscriminant and non-notable  .  There is no hope of notability, and no hope of coverage by reliable sources.  It is ideal for an outside fan site like wikia.  The closest we could have would be if the article for the overall series cited a review which mentioned select Cinco products by name, as part of prose.  But that has nothing at all to do with this article, which is a huge waste of effort for Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT||WP:N)

Comment: I've reopened my  closure on contentions from two editors. Regards
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion process (WP:NPASR)

Comment: this is classic fancruft. Poorly sourced, overly detailed |directory of trivial fictional things. Merging anything of this stuff into another article would make that article worse
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)