Deletion of GeMagic

Comment: I thought it was a computer graphics card from Taiwan before I actually read the thing. Clearly fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Not notable and doesn't satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: I removed the disclaimer that it's not advertising from the page, as it appeared to be a pre-emptive AfD comment, and instead I'm posting it here.  While it was in the original edit, I felt that it violated the general practice of not posting content disclaimers.  If it is truely not advertising, then it's |Neutrality should be apparent from the article itself.  The disclaimer read (for information purposes) as follows: "There are pages for the Bedazzler and Magic Bullet appliance with the same general information and they are not deleted. This is an article that provides information on the product. It is not a form of advertising"  To me this is an AfD comment made before the fact, and not appropriate for a mainspace article, as they attempt to cite comparisons in the introduction to the article itself
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as insufficiently notable per #Criteria for products and services. Product has not ''"been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself."'' --&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)