Deletion of List of European exonyms

Comment: exonymy is part of toponymy and history and is encyclopedic. #PAPER, nearly all other large Wikipedias in other language have these so apparently the notion that this is encyclopedic and notable is widespread. Google scholar has over 300 hits for "exonyms OR exonym OR exonymy" so scholars seem to think it's worthwhile
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: Lists are distinct from both categories and articles and have an important part to play in the project - see  and . If these were purporting to be articles they would be far substandard, but as lists (and clearly headed as such) they are an extremely useful part of the cross-referencing para-structure of the encyclopedia as a whole. This is ''especially'' true of Central and Eastern Europe, where German was once a ''lingua franca'' and where borders have been so often changed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST||WP:CLS)