Deletion of Carmella Bing (2nd nomination)

Comment: Passes  because she has won a well-known and significant industry award; UK Adult Film and Television Award's Best Overseas Female Performer. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Brooks (pornographic actress)|Here's an AfD for a UK Adult Film and Television Award recipient which resulted in a keep consensus. None of the above arguments are good reasons to disregard the award. Redban: She did win an award, it's listed in her article, and not having mainstream popularity or Hall of Fame inductions does not counteract her winning an award. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: 1. The ceremony's length of time is irrelevant. 2. I'm sure nearly everyone who has been nominated for that award attended the ceremony and spend money on tickets, a table, food, etc. but only one person per category won, so what makes you think that had anything to do with how they chose the winners? 3. Pretty much every awards ceremony, both porn and mainstream, has been accused of being rigged by either people within the industry who were angry because they didn't win, or fans who were angry that their favorites didn't win, and like you said yourself, those posts are not "conclusive evidence" for those claims. 4. That Jamie Brooks scene probably does exist. Perhaps it's a website scene, which is why it doesn't show up on IAFD, which only keeps track of films distributed on VHS/DVD/Blue-ray etc. and not internet-only adult content. And there shouldn't be any controversy over the existence of an awarded film for Bing since her award was for her entire body of work for that year, not a particular film
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: A non-notable pornstar who fails . She has no award wins, no mainstream popularity, no Hall of Fame inductions, no unique contributions to porn
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)