Deletion of List of COTA bus routes

Comment: this wasn't an easy one, and the argument above has run hot. There's a lot of work gone into the article and I didn't take this vote lightly. I'm not convinced by invoking WP:NOTGUIDE because the article does not try to fulfil that function, but I am ultimately convinced that this article fails : "Lists are commonly written to satisfy one of the following sets of criteria: ''Every entry in the list fails the notability criteria''. These lists are created explicitly because most or all of the listed items do not warrant independent articles: for example, List of Dilbert characters or List of paracetamol brand names. Such lists are almost always better placed within the context of an article on their "parent" topic. Before creating a stand-alone list consider carefully whether such lists would be better placed within a parent article. (Note that this criterion is never used for living people.) Best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LISTCRITERIA)

Comment: This is a list of bus routes in a mid-sized metropolitan area in the United States. It does ''not'' violate  since a visual map of routes does not make Wikipedia a travel guide, nor is a description of these routes' termini. These descriptions are defining traits of the bus routes, not a "travel guide". Furthermore, the nominator says there is "no indication anywhere that these bus routes are notable". However, that is not demonstrably true, as there are https://search.proquest.com/results/2722EB1863BB49B6PQ/1 thousands of https://www.newspapers.com/search/#query=%22cota%22+bus+routes&p_province=us-oh news articles about COTA bus routes in Columbus, OH. I have not looked into any specific bus routes, and they may very well be non-notable on their own, but I cannot find evidence that COTA bus routes ''overall'' are non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL)

Comment: heres another one, so there was a reason for another relist, not convinced that this meets , all the above has not brought out any books/sources that discusses (or a part of) this list
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST)

Comment: Violates .  is not a reason to keep
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRAVEL||WP:USEFUL)