Deletion of Larry Harris (U.S. Marine)

Comment: fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: another in a long line of well-written, adequately sourced articles on long-dead soldiers dragged to AfD for no apparent reason ( is an essay
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER)

Comment: WP:SOLDIER is an |essay and so has "''no official status, and do not speak for the Wikipedia community''".  Tell it to the Marines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Essays (WP:ESSAY)

Comment: I believe it passes , although the sourcing can certainly be improved
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: while ignoring ,  is apparently not met. Military times is just a copy of his medal citation, not independent coverage, the two DOD sources are not in-depth coverage, which leaves us with two San Diego area publications covering him (one major, one local). I'd expect more to establish notability here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SOLDIER||WP:GNG)

Comment: Any SIGCOV is in local or regional media which one would expect would be different should they actually be notable. The one "major" source is borderline SIGCOV. That still leaves us needing multiple intellectually different sources. I ignore SNG's when it comes to AfD's simply because most SNG's, and really all should, presume notability. Under  you may presume notability if there is reasoned confidence that SIGCOV will be written in the future to allow the subject to pass GNG criteria (notes included at the bottom for clarity). I don't see that being the case here so it fails notability criteria at this time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Seems to fall on the borderline line of , and doesn't get any traction from the advisory NSOLDIER
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)