Deletion of Lord John and the Succubus

Comment: to Diana_Gabaldon#Lord_John_series. In addition to SwisterTwister's finds, there are reviews at Kirkus reviews and Entertainment Weekly, but each were just a paragraph within a larger review. I have not yet found any in-depth independent reviews from reliable sources, but from all the finds the topic is threshold notable/non-notable. The novella is clearly verifiable and WP users could be expected to search for this title. According to , it is best to preserve verifiable information when we can reasonably do so. A merge or redirect to the Lord John series is best until sufficient sources build for a separate article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: The short story does not meet notability per .  If its content can be included in another article then and editor should do so
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BKCRIT)