Deletion of Alpha Octant

Comment: for lack of |citations to |reliable, third-party sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE||WP:RS)

Comment: It is unoriginal research (does not advance a thesis) and  is a subjective and inaccurate "reason" for deletion. especially given the totally disputed nature of the notability guideline.  --Happy editing!  Sincerely
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:JNN)

Comment: Has had a long enough time to prove the existance of sources to satisfy core policies and guidelines like , ,  and OT#PLOT, and still no-one coming to its defense is quite detrimental. A vage interpretation of one sentence of  in ignorance of the following sentences doesn't cut it for me. &ndash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:OR||WP:N||WP:NOT||WP:5P)