Deletion of Jesus Christ: The Musical (2nd nomination)

Comment: or '''Merge to I Will Survive#Other covers & popular culture''' - Sources are not sufficient to establish notability.  The few sources which actually deal with the subject in a non-trivial way ''all'' focus on the copyright lawsuit associated with it.  The video itself does not appear to be notable per  nor does it pass FILM or .  Below is a description of all of the sources that are currently included in this article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:NFILM||WP:GNG)

Comment: WP:ITSFUNNY|Some people apparently think it's funny, and |I still don't like it - so what?  It is |sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:RS)

Comment: We just did this a year ago and nothing has changed. Is the article the greatest article ever? No. Will it ever be a featured article? Almost certainly not. But is it notable per ? Yes, and that's the criteria we're going by here. The mentions are not trivial merely because they relate the video to copyright infringement--they are contextual, and the context of copyright law is a central one to this video. There are several notable sources that provide non-trivial coverage of the topic along with an impressive number of additional sources, notable and not, with more cursory treatment. The former is a good hint to notability, and the latter proves it. Snottywong: it's not about the quality of the topic, nor does every parody music video belong in Wikipedia, but that's not the criteria here: notability is, and this article has it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: WP:GNG and  satisfied per consensus of previous discussion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Substantial" (length) and "Significant" (detail) are not the same thing.  Many of the sources in the article appear to |address the subject directly in detail, rather than being trivial listings or similar.  |Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it '''need not be the main topic''' of the source material
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)