Deletion of IPad 2

Comment: Although it is notable and has sources, as is required by , it isn't confirmed by Apple for one thing, and we don't really have very much info for a whole article. I think we should put this speculation in the regular iPad article instead, and then restart the iPad 2 article again when the new version is released
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: while there may be press coverage, the original sources are generally obscure Chinese trade publications (in this case Economic News Daily, who are they?) and are basically ing. We aren't MacRumors
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: As the iProduct hasn't been formally announced by Apple, the article falls under 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SPECULATION)

Comment: as per . There is definitely enough press coverage to be notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Article can be recreated when or if it's necessary, but for now it's |crystal ball territory
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)