Deletion of List of solar eclipses seen from China

Comment: seems harmless enough, and , so why not extend this to the whole world? Could be very useful and I could certainly see people looking it up
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:WINP)

Comment: for  you pointed, but this is NOT original research. I suggest you read what original research first, since solar eclipses are verifyable. Anyone with a astrosoft and some astronomical knowledge can verify these eclipses. &mdash
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: on 3 points. The first two: the article violates both  and  as it stands since it does not cite the source of its information. Third point: Even though I am really keen on physics and astronomy as a hobby, this kind of info qualifies as |an indiscriminate collection of information and really belongs on some astronomy website, where the information probably comes from. Taken to one extreme, if this article is kept then similar articles ''for every country in the world'' would be equally acceptable and IMHO is overkill. Taken to another extreme, since prediction of eclipses is not crystal balling, predictions from the beginning of time to the end of time would be equally valid, and '''Wikipedia:Notability (numbers)|Wikipedia is not infinite'''. To answer the above point about eclipse enthusiasts, any true eclipse enthusiast worth his salt (and I am one, though probably not worth my salt) would keep an eye on astronomy websites and/or news of upcoming events
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:NOT)

Comment: Not encyclopedic. #Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Wikipedia:List|Lists should be navigational aids or development aids, this is neither
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)