Deletion of Death by ice cream

Comment: I was honestly expecting this to be nonsense, and instead it is a meaningful and surprising collection of sourced deaths. It is not  because no ''conclusion'' is reached: it simply lists together related cases. Nor it is , for the same reason: this is not a primary essay on ice-cream related deaths, it just summarizes what sources say. Other rationales like "it's trivia" or "we can't have deaths by X articles" are just  non-arguments. I think the delete !votes should look beyond the fact that the article title sounds funny or trivial, and reason by policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH||WP:OR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Two examples are put together using riginal research.  One is ot news, the other might or might not deserve its own article under its own name
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Orphan (WP:O||WP:N)