Deletion of Seal Transportation

Comment: Concur with WikiDan61 and others re. .  Moreover, the title is misleading: I would have assumed that the article covered the use of seals as beasts of burden.  If kept, it should be retitled something like "Transportation of seals"; and it would give rise to a raft of other pinniped-care-and-maintenance articles, e.g. "Feeding of captive seals", "Skin care for seals", "Dental care for seals", &c., &c
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTHOWTO)

Comment: Bad faith creation" or a user's contribution history are not in and of themselves valid rationales for deletion, but this article is 100% POV editorializing, and even if it was an encyclopedic topic it would need to be |blown up and started over to meet the policy on |neutral point-of-view. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT||WP:NPOV)

Comment: as per  Wikipedia is not a manual or how to. On a side note the editors history is moot remember 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMANUAL||WP:AGF)