Deletion of Urban dog

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDICTIONARY)

Comment: Even if this were actually a thing, it would still fail on the grounds of being an un-nottable .  But this is not a thing, this is the result of googling two words and noting that they are sometimes used in conjunction with one another.  None of these sources indicate why this is a concept that is separate, and needs a split article, from any of the other topics already noted in some of the responses above
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NEOLOGISM)

Comment: The article was started as a quick response to a RfD, as explained above.  It was started as a  because it was late at night.  A stub is a valid way to get a topic started as per our |editing policy:{{quote|Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. For instance, one person may start an article with an overview of a subject or a few random facts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: per above ,otdictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP: N)