Deletion of NGC 529

Comment: WP:NASTRO contains many suggestions on how to determine if an object is notable, but doesn't determine notability. See the note at the bottom of the criteria section: '''Note 1:''' These criteria do not supersede , they merely supplement and clarify it within the context of astronomical objects. This object fails general notability criteria as there isn't significant coverage of it in any sources (that I could find, at least
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: See , which specifically lists the NGC catalog as being of sufficient importance that objects in it are considered notable enough for a stand-alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)