Deletion of Next.js

Comment: Since I struck out my vote above earlier. It passes every single aspect of  and does not fall into any what Wikipedia is not traps, I can find no valid reason to delete. Also  might be just an essay but is a good guideline in lack of a specialty guideline and has apparently been used before. Finally, for everyone who would want to see it merged but can't find a redirect, how about React (web framework)? I will say nothing more (even though ikipedia is not a democracy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSOFT||WP:W)

Comment: Seems to meet GNG with TechRepublic article and Springer Book, as well as the Stackoverflow blog. If stackoverflow blog is considered /, then I wouldn't reject it for the purpose of notability just because it is largely an interview of the subject or subject's author. Being interviewed in  makes the subject notable. Interviews are considered primary source with respect to factual information, not notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IS||WP:RS)