Deletion of Dark orbit

Comment: because I cannot find anything notable using http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Dark+orbit%22+game+source:%22-newswire%22+source:%22-wire%22+source:%22-presswire%22+source:%22-PR%22+source:%22-press%22+source:%22-release%22&sa=N&start=10 this unashamed |search engine test as well as  at least because the article is unable to establish self-notability.  However, I recognize that this could change and would frown if this afd was referenced in a future debate over a revived Dark orbit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Search engine test (WP:SET||WP:SBST)

Comment: and borderline speedy deletion per either A7 (open to interpretation) or G11. Borderline |advertisement, and definitely nothing that can establish notability here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Spam (WP:SPAM)

Comment: notability not established wrt 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The game may be |somewhat notable due to its "real money"-to-"game money" scheme, which is referenced http://74.125.93.132/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.pcwelt.de/index.cfm%3Fpid%3D1652%26pk%3D126900&rurl=translate.google.com&usg=ALkJrhgVnUFCanv_rHWnMswAKclsO7Ohww here (translated automatically from Google, so please bear with it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)