Deletion of KOI-2194.03

Comment: KOIs should not be exempt from either  or . As a practical matter, if every candidate exoplanet receives an article without regard to GNG and NASTRO, then WP will be flooded with stubs about non-notable exoplanet candidates which needlessly duplicate catalog information. The problem with merging into a list is that I'm not sure that there's encyclopedic value in a list of objects which aren't sufficiently notable to warrant their own articles. On an unrelated note, a number of these KOI stubs contain very speculative statements about habitability. In the event that these articles are kept, I think that these statements should be removed unless substantiated by in-depth, peer-reviewed research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NASTRO)

Comment: WP:NOTCATALOGUE applies here. As others have mentioned, the threshold for notability under  could be considered confirmation as an exoplanet rather than just candidate status. I'm not opposed to merging candidate articles into a list within another single article, but I don't think there's enough unique content to justify such a list right now
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)