Deletion of List of Wii games that use the Nintendo GameCube controller

Comment: This is nothing more than a big case of . THE Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_8#Category:Wii_games_that_use_the_Gamecube_controller|CfD (also started by RobJ) for the category that this article evolved from called on the creation of this article. RobJ did not like that and put this article up on the WPVG talk page. Within less than 24h of discussion he used the fledgling discussion as an excuse to blank the page and turn it into a redirect (Here is the evidence http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wii_games_that_use_the_Nintendo_GameCube_controller&diff=prev&oldid=296115478, look at the time (05:23, 13 June 2009) and look at when the discussion had started (18:58, 12 June 2009)). Keep in mind, he did not even inform anyone who edits the page of his opening a discussion prior to his blanking the page and redirecting. Most of the "delete" points made above are actually false
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I don't think this fails , as it is not a list of statistics. In addition, this is about backwards compatability as much as it is about control devices
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: Seems to violate |the guidance against indiscriminate information; just because something is true and useful doesn't mean we need to include it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: The article is sourced well enough and I believe that  is being improperly invoked in the delete votes. Also, despite the attempted intimidation from prolific deletionists over Thegreyanomaly allegedly not assuming good faith with the nom and delete votes, RobJ1981's nomination rationale is actually a textbook case of  (aka ), , and even . Throughout the nom not a single useful argument is made. Others have complained about the article being excessive, which is a styl e issue and not a notability issue. Misguided deletion votes with an extremely weak nomination leave me no choice but to vote for keep on this one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:IDONTLIKEIT||WP:ITSCRUFT||WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC||WP:USELESS)

Comment: Can't really see how the subject fails , especially with its current sourcing. Definitely needs cleanup, particularly in terms of expansion on the intro, but these "trivial" claims seem to be little more than  arguments at the moment
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: Per , if all control devices were listed for all games, they would be endless. I don't see how this one is notable or encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)

Comment: This list is just as encyclopedic as any other list.  It is extensively referenced, and at least one editor ({{ul|Thegreyanomaly}}) has been actively in maintaining it.  It doesn't resemble any of the examples in .  I imagine it would be useful to Wii owners (though I am not one myself).  While it's surely a low priority for the encyclopedia, the marginal cost of keeping it seems slight
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)