Deletion of Blockstack

Comment: No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP)

Comment: Are you sure you've properly read and understood both  and ? References that meet the criteria for establishing notability are examined to a higher standard than references used to support a fact within the article. To meet the criteria for establishing notability, references must first of all be "intellectually independent" - this means that the reference must not extensively rely on information provided by the company (company announcements and press releases) or their officers (founder interview profiles, quotations, other interviews) and instead must provide some intellectually independent opinions or analysis. Forbes is usually a terrible source, most of their article on new companies are advertorials. https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurashin/2017/05/23/blockstack-unveils-a-browser-for-the-decentralized-web/#3570bcb671cd This Forbes reference fails as it is not intellectually independent as it relies on quotations and information from company officers provided at a conference, failing  and . https://www.coindesk.com/blockstack-blockchain-decentralized-browser/ The first Coinbase reference is based on a company announcement and quotations from a company officer - fails for the same reasons. Also, CoinDesk is not an independent source since CoinDesk is a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which has an ownership stake in Blockstack. https://www.coindesk.com/blockstack-4-million-funding-series-a/ The next CoinDesk reference fails because CoinDesk is not an independent source and also fails because it also relies on information provided by the company. https://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/02/25/blockstack-makes-dns-more-secure-by-building-on-top-of-the-blockchain/ The SiliconAngle reference fails  as it says nothing about the company - the topic of this article - and only discusses the technology. Finally https://www.wired.com/story/the-decentralized-internet-is-here-with-some-glitches/ this Wired reference is a mere mention-in-passing and fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Scholar appears to be showing significant coverage, while some of that is  there do appear to be several independent references ... eg ISBN:1983910821 Anderson; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8291986/.  Creating author apparently not informed by nom
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPIP)

Comment: The reference namechecks the company but does not provide in-depth information on the company. At most it discusses the technology developed by the company. The reference fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: Having examined the references, none meet the criteria for establishing notability. They fail the test for intellectual independence and rely on company sources or they don't discuss the company. References fail  and/or , topic fails GNG and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGIND||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:NCORP)