Deletion of Secure digital forensic imaging

Comment: None of the documents cited as references actually use the term "secure digital forensic imaging", so far as I can tell. This does not necessarily mean that the concept is not notable, but it does lead me to wonder whether it is using the correct title, and whether it might just need a move, and perhaps some editing to become more general. #Footnote system|Inline citations would definitely help, too
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:CITE)

Comment: and put on probation list for one month for the editor (and others) to improve it.  Alternatively, '''wp:userfy|userfy''' it, but with the likely outcome that only the editor will work on it.  As it stands, there is no overt advertising (and therefore little acute harm done) but the article is transgressing , which is unsustainable in the long run.  The article creator says ''"this is a process greater than anything I am involved in."''  I would take this at face value, and ask him to write an article on this greater process, with a broader title, and as a sub-issue it could mention the proprietary system here.  The article creator is evidently a sawy expert content contributor, his comments above demonstrate willingness to conform to WP policies, he shows a healthy measure of good faith - but it is simply his first article.  We should encourage people like him to contribute, outright deletion is not the right thing to do here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Advertising (WP:ADVERT)