Deletion of Vivian Sørmeland

Comment: The sources have been shown to exist, and the fact that they are not in English is totally irrelevant. Many source are not available to all readers because they are only available in libraries in certain parts of the world, or for many other reasons, but we don't insist that direct quotations should be provided in these cases, so why do so when the reason for non-accessability by everyone is that they are not in English? The need to provide quotations with translations was a recent change to  which is severely damaging to English Wikipedia's mission as an Encyclopedia covering the whole world. English is simply the language in which the encyclopedia is written, not the language in which sources have to be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:RSUE)

Comment: GoogleNews returns only 4 hitshttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Vivian+S%C3%B8rmeland%22. None are in English, so I don't know what they actually say. The Sesam hits are in Norwegian as well, I can't tell what they are about. Per , verifiable translations of at least some of these would have to be provided to establish notability per  or . If someone is willing to do that, there will be something to discuss. If not, delete
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:RSUE||WP:BIO||WP:N)

Comment: However much I would like to see this article disappear, she is still notable, per . A search on Sesam (see http://sesam.no/search/?q=%22Vivian+S%C3%B8rmeland%22&x=0&y=0&c=m) privides 688 hits, just in news search. Just the fact that she broke up with her boyfriend seemed to get media coverage in every large and small newspaper nationwide. Of course, someone should add some of these references in the article to prove notability, unless they want this article to be deleted
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)