Deletion of Jonathan Doria Pamphilj

Comment: Meets otability criteria which states that, "Significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article". JDP has had coverage in the media ranging from that in the US (New York Times and Vanity Fair), Italy (Corriere della sera and Il Tempo), and the UK (Guardian, Independent, and Telegraph). This coverage relates to his work in managing the internationally famous Palazzo Doria art collection and palace, but particularly because of the high-profile court case that he is involved in to challenge Italian inheritance laws around surrogacy. The case has received more than a trivial mention. The media sources cited have editorial integrity, are mainstream, and are multiple; They are also independent of the subject. The gay rights role is not simply about marching but about challenging the rights over inheritance by children of same-sex parents - thus it is significant for LGBT rights in Italy. Nor is the issue of Italy not recognising noble titles a problem - otherwise why would we have articles on Russian aristocrats or King Constantine of Greece? While I agree the bloodline died out with his mother - he is nevertheless her adopted heir and as such her successor to the lineage etc and is recognised as a prince in international peerage compendiums
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)