Deletion of Joel L. Young

Comment: based on  #3, multiple book reviews in reliable sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Wow! Rarely seen such an article. Professionally done, I have to admit. If you don't look closer, you might actually think that this guy is a giant in his field. We should keep this gem somewhere, as it is a beautiful example of what paid advocacy editing can mean for WP! Dr. Young, unfortunately, doesn't even come close to meeting . As noted above, he might squeak by on WP:AUTHOR, but this article is an irredeemable load of Spam (Monty Python)|spam, spam, with spam (indeed borderline G11, as David Eppstein said
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: as per , DGG and  .This article is clearly a paid advertisement and promotion for his work with the biography acting as nothing but a  done by a   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Muhammad_Ali_Khalid  paid editor across sock accounts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:BLOWITUP||WP:ADVERT||WP:COATRACK)

Comment: Agree with the above. As far as his professional qualifications, he appears to be a run-of-the-mill psychiatrist who has given his practice a fancy name to make it sound like an important "behavioral center". As far as  goes he doesn't come close. As far as  goes, aside from ''Psychiatric Services'' I am not impressed with the journals/magazines that chose to review his book; it doesn't exactly sound like it has rocked the field or flown off the shelves. It was put out by a mainstream publisher, but I don't feel it has made him notable as WP defines it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC||WP:AUTHOR)