Deletion of Belgians

Comment: most "keep" comments here are pointing to  which is an argument to AVOID. If anyone has suggestions,  ideas how to resolve the critical problems of the article that I've described in the nomination, it's the time to do it. So far neither of the ''keep'' votes did that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:INHERIT)

Comment: The claim that there are no such people is absurd - like claiming that there are no British or Swiss.  The title of the article seems to be a  used in sources such as ''The Belgians'', ''History of the Belgians'', ''Belgians in the United States'', &c.  For an example of a encyclopedic entry elsewhere, please see ''http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kfv6HKXErqAC&pg=PA66 Encyclopedia of European peoples'' which has a substantial entry entitled '''Belgians: nationality
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article titles (WP:COMMONNAME)

Comment: I also agree there is a distinct lack of significant coverage here, and I am surprised to see all the s coming out without any substantial changes to the actual article.  I still hold that the information here is not entirely different from what is currently in Communities, regions and language areas of Belgium.  Most of you are arguing that there are Belgians, and I am not one to disagree.  The term may even be used in encyclopedias, but the information that would be encyclopaedic seems to fit well under Communities, regions and language areas of Belgium
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)