Deletion of K. de Silva

Comment: to Kandy Youth Cricket Club as valid search term – Per Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_135#The_criteria_of_SPORT_here_are_too_inclusive|this discussion, subject-specific |notability guidelines do not supersede the |general notability guideline, except in clear cases where |GNG does not apply to. ''As it is the single most recent consensus on the notability of sport bios'', I feel obliged to go with the result of the discussion: '''NSPORTS does not supersede GNG'''. This really does need to be reflected on sport guideline pages, though, as this can seriously mislead people. Also, I will note that less coverage has to be applied for this article to be considered notable. Also fails 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:BIO1E)

Comment: despite the CA page because of the uncertainty created by the incomplete CI one. Even so, in answer to the incoherent nomination, I would point out that no one says SSG supersedes GNG. They are held to be equal per the introduction to  itself which states unequivocally: "A topic is presumed to merit an article if it meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right; and it is not excluded under the  policy". "Either...or..." means what it says and  is one of the listed SSG
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOT||WP:NSPORTS)

Comment: Ordinarily I would say merge into a list of Kandy cricket club players, that being the correct way to deal with raw statistical entries, but in this case the two major statistics aggregating sites disagree over whether this player was a first-class player. That means  is problematic, to say nothing of notability requirements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)