Deletion of Judaism and violence

Comment: as this article conflicts directly with #ESSAY. Although it may have lots of of sources, some of which may be related to violence as well as Judaism, this topic is little more than a high school essay topic or the subject for a debating competition. The politicising of topics such as Judaism with violence, war, international conspiracies, the "German question" or the "Palestine question" by presenting essays as encyclopaedic articles really needs to stop, or otherwise Wikipedia is going to turn into a platform for thinly disguised |soapboxing, which is the primary purpose of essay writing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SOAPBOX)

Comment: very reluctantly, simply because this is not just about Judaism, but many serious faiths are confronted with this topic: Mormonism and violence; Christianity and violence; Islam and violence; Religious violence, see the scope of the latter, it's a real subject. Judaism, like everything else, does have its warts. That's life. This article needs work, perhaps it can become a {{tl|disambiguation}} template eventually for more clarity and specificity, but right now the situation seems to be one of people getting carried away with  and  because of what's going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judaism and bus stops and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace and violence in Judaism and it's time to stop this vicious cycle and go on with rational mature editorial behavior. Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT||WP:REICHSTAG)

Comment: per Noleander and Zero. Some interesting points made re. deletion, regrettably risking being undermined by increasingly absurd accusations and |opinions asserted as fact from the |"I don't like it, get rid of it" contingent
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: I think the above could be taken as a |personal attack, and does not seem to be an argument relevant to the discussion at hand. Would you consider striking it as a gesture of good faith
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: Well sourced, clearly encyclopedic, does in no way fall within the perview of #ESSAY
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)