Deletion of List of Playboy Playmates with D-cup or larger breasts

Comment: It's not a coincidence;  states that all Playboy Playmates meet notability.  Keep because: The original reason for nomination is invalid; This can't be converted to a category without messing up the organization (though it should probably be chronological than alpha-by-decade);  While it may or may not be true that "breast size is not an important factor in a person", it's certainly more relevant to one's career as a porn star than eye or hair color
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PORNBIO)

Comment: quoted bust sizes are notoriously unreliable. I have no problem with the list as such but it has to go as failing 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: per , this is something that should be categorized (at best) and not listed.  There are no annotations, no non-article list items, all items are alphabetically sortable, list topic is redundant with some categories already available, poor precedent for alternate lists of similar topics (i.e., "do we justify lists for Playmates with C-cups, Hustler girls with every cup size, Bigguns with little'uns, etc?"), and finally, the list is founded on the  and/or  violation that "big breasts" must be D-cup or larger and that the resulting list is Playmates with "big breasts
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLS||WP:OR||WP:NPOV)

Comment: per above, this seems too #IINFO|trivial to be in an encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)