Deletion of Richard Ibranyi

Comment: would need sources better than |self-published and Youtube
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: No Google News hits, and a straight G-search turns in the usual top level hits that are sure signposts of non-notability: his Linkedin page, YouTube hits, various social media.  Lacking, of course, are reliable sources which would satisfy the GNG.  I've two comments for FlaviusConstantinus.  First, to take offense at a perfectly innocuous turn of phrase which was not -- as even the most casual browser must surely see -- aimed at the subject is not only baroque, |it's uncivil.  Second, whatever the subject's contribution to religious thought, that's not the measure of whether someone meets the notability standards for a Wikipedia article.  It's whether the world has ''heard'' of his contributions to religious thought.  So far, seemingly, it hasn't, and that's the bottom line.  (One hopes that that's a suitably enough religion-free idiom, so that it isn't possible to construe it as a religious attack of some sort
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)