Deletion of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (film)

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: There is no clear boundary on exactly how much 'solid' evidence/proof from sources is needed for it to qualify for . One's thing's for sure, this movie is going to happen. There is enough verifiable evidence to prove the production of this film in my opinion. Any article that documents a future event ''is'' a target for crystalgazing and you can't delete all articles on future events now can you
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I was concerned as well when I noted that this article existed already. Having checked it over carefully, however, I don't think that it violates #CRYSTALBALL: all of the information is sourced, and it seems obvious that there will ''eventually'' be a movie, given the rampant commercialization of Harry Potter as a franchise. I'm no big fan of the books (they're overrated, somewhat formulaic, and ultimately not as great as everyone says they are), but I'm inclined to agree that this article, while definitely stubby, contains only what is appropriate and can, as information becomes available, be expanded appropriately
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: This doesn't fall under , as the picture is contracted to be made. In the event that the film was never released, it would justify the article as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: until more information can be found. 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: According to , "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." It is indisputable that the seventh HP film is both notable and certain to be made. If the article is deleted now, it's just going to keep getting recreated over and over again, as more information becomes known. There is enough known now to justify the article as it stands
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint have all signed contracts to appear in this film.  Release is certain.  Not a case of  (in fact, I believe that at one point  used "Harry Potter Book 7" as an example of a product to be released in the future which ''was'' acceptable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: It does not violate .  The fact that this movie will be made has been verified.  In addition, this article is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: The article is already flagged {{future film}}, and will be updated as details about are discovered.  People will visit this page to learn about the film, and I see no reason why it should be deleted just because there's little fact known about it at the moment, regardless of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Because |Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; meaning that we don't contain information about events that supposed to happen in future, but are not confirmed in reliable sources. A film that doesn't even have a screen-writer yet is pretty wobbly, and what's more, this can be re-created when substantial information is available. It's just too soon
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: Per rystal|Wikipedia is not a crystalball
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)