Deletion of Centraview (3rd nomination)

Comment: Simply being open source is not an exemption from notability requirements, however much you might |favor it as a cause.  This remains |yet another software suite that ''includes a combination of Contact Management, Sales Force Automation (SFA), and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) functionality''.  Making such a thing is apparently such a mighty achievement that every single package ever made imagines itself worthy of an encyclopedia entry.  The only thing I found that did not look like a PR entry was http://www.infoworld.com/d/applications/best-open-source-applications-140 this incidental mention
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT||WP:MILL)

Comment: Article lacks |reliable third party sources and is mainly comprised of |origional research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:IRS||WP:OR)