Deletion of RU Andromedae

Comment: it meets  criteria 2, obviously, as the star is cataloged in the General Catalog of Variable Stars and has been given a variable star designation
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTRO)

Comment: I did find a few sources which provide some limited commentary specific to RU Andromedae (sometimes abbreviated as RU And. in the literature): http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1905AJ.....24..181W, http://books.google.com/books?id=lWDlG_CppAQC&pg=PA207; the ''Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada'' on several occasions published a paragraph on the star in its "Variable Star Notes" (e.g. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1954JRASC..48...21M/0000023.000.html, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1959JRASC..53...91M).  Admittedly the commentary is short and the papers are relatively elderly, but taken together, these do provide "significant commentary" per  #3.  Factoring in the argument by Carlossuarez46 too, it seems to me that this star is notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NASTCRIT)