Deletion of Katie Brownell (2nd nomination)

Comment: This shows a severe limitation in |1E - when the event is not as notable as the person becomes as a result of the event. In this case, we cannot cover the event in the way the spirit of the policy means. A congratulatory meeting with the President, and the placing of her jersey into the Baseball Hall of Fame put this beyond the normal "dog bites man" concerns that the policy is meant to address. The Hall of Fame thing is the real kicker for me, as this demonstrates ongoing notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: per , and if we start deciding xfD discussions on the basis of , then let's just shut down the whole process
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:IAR)

Comment: The article satisfies , but let's think about this. Is a kid pitching a perfect game encyclopedic? The answer to that is no, sources or not. I'm invoking  here, I don't see how this is worthy of an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:IAR)

Comment: for the same reason I gave last time: "*The standard for  for an amateur is "Competitors and coaches who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports (who meet the general criteria of secondary sources published about them)." Little League is the highest level available in baseball for people of her age. Her gender makes her a rarity in the sport, and her accomplishment has been achieved by only a select few. She has been honored by the Baseball Hall of Fame as the article states. ... The article is sourced with independent third party sources. This person is notable by amateur athletes standards
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: Per .  Frankly, the arguments to keep this are terrible.  What's next, junior croquet players
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)