Deletion of Seattle Youth Garden Works

Comment: Meets  and meets , as per a source review. I consider the ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'' to meet the requirements of . When it was a print publication, its circulation included all of King County, Washington|King County, not just Seattle (https://books.google.com/books?id=-UWhCWv1PwsC&pg=PA206 source, from 1962). As such, this qualifies as regional coverage. The ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'' has since changed to an internet-only format, but that does not automatically mean that its reach has all of the sudden shrank to exist only within Seattle. Irregardless, ''Seattle Post-Intelligencer'' articles such as https://archive.is/z6OOu this published about the topic in 1995 were published ''before'' the newspaper went to online-only in 2009. I'm unable to access the Springer Science+Business Media source in entirety, but per the "Sources with quotes" box atop, I consider three decent-sized paragraphs specifically about the topic to comprise significant coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORGDEPTH||WP:AUD||WP:AUD)