Deletion of Apple iCar

Comment: There's no doubt the mainstream press (WSJ, Time, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, etc) has jumped on this.  Normally, I would say that meets  in spades, but fundamentally, this is still just a rumor, contrary to .  Whatever is worth saying about it can be said as a section of the Apple article until it actually exists
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I'll switch to redirect/merge, article is still much too speculative but is an OK section of a larger one).'' Since when was Wikipedia full of unconfirmed speculation? Re-reading  this article should be deleted immediately, for the exact same reason the article Samsung Galaxy S6 was deleted today because it isn't being officially revealed until tomorrow. Sure it has press coverage but until something if officially confirmed, it should be deleted. --> these comments were unsigned by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: I believe this car will exist. But that's the issue, it doesn't exist yet an this is speculation, which is explicitly covered in rystal. This should be merged into the EV section
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyrights (WP:C)

Comment: We shouldn't be second-guessing the RS (that's why we consider them RS in the first place: so ''they'' can do the heavy lifting and filter out the |BS for us). While redirects are , this is a big enough story (given Time, Forbes and the WSJ all instantly pouncing on it) to keep on the deck
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Complete bollocks (WP:BULLSHIT||WP:CHEAP)