Deletion of Han American

Comment: semi-protect, '''and expand''': Han chauvinism is serious above on this discussion page. It's like arguing that Arab Americans ≡ Saudi Americans, or all British Americans ≡  English Americans.  See . Special:Contributions/124.217.187.143|124.217.187.143
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Systemic bias (WP:CSB)

Comment: to Chinese American per  or '''Delete''' per failing . As stated within the article the subject false clearly within scope of the '''Chinese American''' article. While there maybe different ethnicities within the Chinese American population or different language based populations within the Chinese American population, that doesn't mean that they automatically get an article. Those populations/groups/ethnicities need to meet . Doing a search for "Han American" I did not find any articles that give the population/group |significant coverage using that subject name. While I don't disagree with the view that there are different ethnicities within the Chinese American population (like how within Filipino American population there are Tagalog people, Ilocano people, etc.), there are sufficient reliable sources to verify that the subject of this AfD is independently notable for a stand-alone article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK||WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: to Chinese American per . The topic has so much overlap with Chinese American that having a separate article is meaningless. Just because some Germans are of Slavic or Turkish descent does not mean we need a separate Germanic German American alongside German American. Similarly, we don't need Slavic Russian American when we already have Russian American
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:CONTENTFORK)