Deletion of Gladys the swiss Dairy Cow

Comment: I can appreciate that this is a longstanding family art tradition, but it is a family tradition nonetheless, and I don't see how this particular yard decoration is more notable than, say, my mom's neighbors who decorate their property with half a zillion watts of Christmas lights come December.  The newspaper mentions are a good start but these appear to be fluff pieces, not an examination of Gladys as art ( requires "multiple non-trivial published works").  Note also .  A web page would be a much more appropriate place for this.  Sorry
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:COI)

Comment: I'm not quite sure what to make of this one.  On one hand, it looks like it might be mainly of local interest, though a claim to statewide noteworthiness has been made.  On the other... it's a quirky article, but it's treated in some depth, and with references.  It certainly appears to pass .  It is |interesting.  Is it important?  We have no guidelines specifically for physical works of art, but taking  as an example, it could arguably pass the "subject of multiple non-trivial published works" criterion, and it's also had multiple exhibitions in different parts of the state.  Finally, effort is clearly being made to continue to improve the article.  In the face of all that, and lacking any strong reason for deletion, I say keep it for now and see how it develops
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:TRIVIA||WP:FILMS)