Deletion of Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev

Comment: WP:PSEUDO is an essay not a guideline or policy while  is when it comes to notable people outside of one event
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: maybe even per ?). I agree with
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: recentism and not needed |fork...aside from the event, they are clearly not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks (WP:FORK)

Comment: Per  and Epeecflechee's comments
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: Per  and . They are clearly within the guidelines to merit a stand-alone article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:SNOW)

Comment: As to , the guideline states: "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate.... as indicated by the large coverage of the event in |reliable sources that devotes significant attention to the individual's role."  Clearly the event is highly significant.  Clearly the role of each individual here is significant.  After the keeps flow in, we should SNOW this
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:RS)

Comment: Per common sense.  Scholars will be studying Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokar Tsarnaev for decades to come.  So it easily easily meets .  It doesn't matter whether or not it meets Wikipedia:Notability (people) since  supersedes Wikipedia:Notability (people).  But in actuality, it also meets criteria #2 of .  So, not matter how you slice or dice it, the result is the same: keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG||WP:PERP)

Comment: and '''clean up''' per |ONEEVENT above
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per , "A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person." The Boston Marathon bombings article could definitely incorporate the information contained in Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Moreover,  also states that "A living person accused of a crime is presumed not guilty unless and until this is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator when no conviction is yet secured." — Preceding ''signed'' comment added by
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PERP||WP:PERP)

Comment: because  threshold is satisfied, given that the bombing and its aftermath occurred and unfolded during a high profile and international event and drew much world-wide attention, and because there is ample precedent for having a separate article on the perpetrators (''alleged'' in this case as of the now) of such crimes/acts, for example: Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden, Martin Bryant and Martin Peyerl. Additionally, I would like to suggest that those involved with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Criminal Biography/Serial Killer task force raise the priority level for maintaining and updating this and similar articles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: I agree that notability is questionable per . What is of encyclopedical interest in their biographies may be dealt with in the main article about the Boston bombings. On the other hand we have detailed articles about Timothy McVeigh and Anders Behring Breivik who are also only notable each for a unique event (if you count the bombing and shooting by Breivik as one coherent act
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per Epeeflechee's comments, and because  is satisfied by the worldwide and longterm effects of the bombings and subsequent crimes they are alleged to have committed, the unprecedented lockdown  of the Boston area and the widely covered massive dragnet of pursuit, and also because sources exist to flesh out the bio info. Today's papers have more bio info on their background. Comprehensive coverage of the bios would be a disproportionate part of the article on the bombings, which should wind up with only a brief summary. Many killers known only for the killings have had their articles kept in past AFDs, showing a consensus that the perpetrator of a notable crime does not need to be notable independent of the crime
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per  "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate.... as indicated by the large coverage of the event in reliable sources that devotes significant attention to the individual's role." The suspects are known '''Worldwide''' it does not get any bigger than that
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)