Deletion of French Twist (Gilmore Girls) (2nd nomination)

Comment: Provided that more sources are available to prove this article is indeed up to the standards of |general notability guidelines.  I believe one or two more sources would achieve this. The article itself needs a bit more cleanup to meet wikipedia's guidelines as well
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: In fact, I did; this was a redirect for several years, before another editor yesterday decided to revert to the older article. After the user reverted my turning this back into a redirect, and since it technically did survive an AfD once before, I thought it nicer to go ahead with a formal AfD.  In other words, I am nominating the page for deletion under the grounds that it doesn't meet ; as a result of the (I believe inevitable) deletion, a redirect would be left.  I want it to be clear to other editors that whether or not this is a standalone article is a matter of compliance with the guidelines, not just a regular content dispute that would be resolved on the article's talk page
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to LoE. No sufficient non-plot material to leave this as a stand-alone article per #PLOT and . ABILITY hasn't been established (just a single ref), but with such popular shows it's better to redirect than to delete so the ep article can be restored if and only if ''someone actually works on it to prove notability.'' &ndash
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:SPLIT||WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: under  ground 1.  It's not necessary to invoke the AfD process if you want to redirect an article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Speedy keep (WP:SK)