Deletion of Proposed Interstate Highways

Comment: While I see the rationale behind the AfD (seemingly |fortune-telling in nature), most, if not all, are backed up with legit sources, which allow speculation if those sources themselves speculate.  However, I think an article should be created for the ones that do not have an article as of yet, granted they have the sources to back up the statements; then, instead of a page with short blurbs, it could be a list and would then be in a perfectly acceptable format. Philadelphia Eagles|Eagles
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: As the title says, these highways are proposed; there is no one hypothesizing that they may be proposed, they have already been proposed, and adequate reliable and verifiable sources have been provided to demonstrate notability. Yet another example of a case where  has been misinterpreted. For that matter, keeping them in an article with the word "proposed" eliminates the knee jerk cries of  violations that would invariably erupt if standalone articles were to be created
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL)