Deletion of Suntribe

Comment: Being short lived doesn't make a band non-notable. Saying they "released no material" is also false, as they released another single, which means it doesn't violate . Even so, that policy also states that "if an event is of sufficient importance, even relatively minor participants may require their own articles". Better sources are indeed required, however
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO1E)

Comment: It is unfortunate that this discussion has gone as far downhill as it has - I think there is a collective need to tone it down a notch or two. I don't agree with the opinion that this is an open and shut case of non-notability, but nor do I think that any kind of merge/re-direct/deletion should be resisted at all costs on fears of slippery slope into mass deletions. Notability isn't too much of an issue in itself here - on the path to Eurovision, it is somewhat implausible that a group/individual wouldn't be subject to coverage in a good number of third-party sources as needed by the  - Eurovision news sites and coverage from a person's/group's home country could both meet this independently. Also, participation in Eurovision clearly passes criterion nine of , and probably ten and twelve as well. The real issue is  and this part: ''"In considering whether or not to create separate articles, the degree of significance of the event itself and the degree of significance of the individual's role within it should be considered. The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person. However, as both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles become justified."'' I interpret this to mean that a re-direct to Eurovision Song Contest 2005 would be inappropriate as the contest was highly significant as was the group's role in it, with the need for a "separate article" defending the existence of Estonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005. Overall, since all the content in the group article could be in the Estonia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005, and are essentially two articles covering the same subject, a merge is appropriate. However, I must emphasise that merges such as this should not be across the board, but done on a case-by-case basis, and this AfD clearly should not be setting a precedent to do the former, as there are many participants which do justify separate bios - I will emphasize that this should be assessed based on what is known about them and the sources available e.t.c. - I don't see the current state of the articles as relevant, per 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:BIO1E||WP:POTENTIAL)