Deletion of Economy of the Caribbean

Comment: while I don't disagree with the nominator's analysis, those aren't really reasons to delete the article; they are |problems that can probably be fixed. The question, in my mind, is whether or not the ''subject'' is |notable or not. I don't think there would be much argument, surely? It should be possible to create a well-sourced article with a comprehensive timeline covering the economy of the Caribbean from Spanish settlement through to a modern tourism-based economy. What the nominator seems to be arguing for is a  deletion which I can seem some justification for, but I think securing some support for a clean-up effort would be a better course of action
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM||WP:N||WP:BLOWITUP)

Comment: it is not so awful as |to be blown up, although it needs a lot of work
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: It's ''possible'' that much of the article may be in |copyright violation of the following sources: http://www.caricom.org/jsp/single_market/services_regime/concept_paper_road_riverain_transport.pdf, http://globalsoft-ezone.com/offers-view/globalsoft-caribbean/. However, it's also possible that those websites may have copied content from the Wikipedia article to their respective sites
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)