Deletion of Caversham Primary School (2nd nomination)

Comment: this school was independently assessed as ''outstanding'', the highest rating for a UK school. Just as we keep Blue Ribbon schools in the US we should keep 'outstanding' schools in the UK. Even if that is not good enough, sufficient sources are available to meet . Yes I know all about  but we have higher priorities in cleaning out WP from nn or promotional pages than bothering about a clean page on a public body
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS)

Comment: Well above average merit" does not equal "Notability." There is no such inherent notability provided by , the relevant guideline for schools that are given some "Ofsted" rating. The Ofsted article seems to say in "Current system of inspection" that 9% of schools get an "Outstanding" rating since 2009, but that 19% got an "Outstanding" rating before 2009.  This is not a compelling argument for notability, at all. In the US, "Blue ribbon" schools include 5200 recipients, or 3.9% of the 133,000 eligible schools. That also is far, far too low a bar. The US award has been criticized as going typically to schools which have students with wealthy parents. In any event it is not selective enough in either country. It is not the "Top performing one school."  requires multiple instances of significant coverage in independent and reliable sources, besides the common outcome of merging elementary and secondary schools. Wikipedia is not a Michelin guide to above average schools. It is specifically |not a directory of every organization which got some particular score in its national rating system.  Being exceptionally good or exceptionally bad at what an organization is there to do does not gain automatic notability. If it did, the 10% lowest rated schools would also be entitled to automatic notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ORG||WP:ORG||WP:NOT)

Comment: There's no rule stating that all primary schools are none-notable, and this one appears to meet  (and even  if you want to go down that route). Of the seven references listed, two - http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/education/s/2084066_primary_schoolss_top_class_results this and http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article544536.ece this - contain significant coverage about the school; the second is a national newspaper, so there's evidence of notability outside of a local area too. There are more sources that aren't in the article yet, both at http://www.henleystandard.co.uk/news/news.php?id=575983 local and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/4186796.stm national level, and even some http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Mpl84OuzuuUC&pg=PA62&dq=%22caversham+primary+school%22&hl=en&ei=vMbfTYbYDs2q8APGwo2qCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=%22caversham%20primary%20school%22&f=false book coverage
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ORG)

Comment: Easily passes the , being documented in detail in independent, reliable sources.  I have made a start on improving the article.  The claim that no effort had been made to improve the article is therefore obsolete.  In any case, that is |an argument to avoid.  Our |editing policy is to improve articles rather than bringing them here
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:IMPERFECT)

Comment: per the common outcome of innumerable primary/elementary school AFDs in recent years. What guideline says "we keep every US school  (or school anywhere) which gets a "Blue Ribbon" (whatever that is)?" Notability is not the same as excellence. Wikipedia is not a "blue ribbon guide to finding an outstanding school for your child." Wikipedia is |not a directory of every elementary school in the world which was in the top x % on its national test result. Getting some particular rating in a given country does not automatically make a primary/elementary school notable enough to have an article in Wikipedia. Fails 
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:ORG)