Deletion of Pam Pinnock

Comment: per Qworty. The article has been around for a year and still has no sources. GoogleNews gives just 1 hithttp://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22Pam+Pinnock%22. Being acquainted with a celebrity is not a sign of notability in and of itself. Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Hard to see how this woman is notable according to WP guidelines.  The sources offered by the previous commentator fail .  The book in question is out from a micro-press that features only one other title on its home page.  And "once dated Mike Tyson" has to be one of the lowest notability bars ever proposed, as it probably includes thousands of women.  The anonymous dial-up who voted Keep has done extensive work on the article without managing to buttress notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: As there are no |reliable sources |cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the |verifiability policy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:V)