Deletion of List of "Occupy" protest locations

Comment: per , , and .  This list helps to indicate the shear scope of the movement.  --Special:Contributions/131.123.123.124|131.123.123.124
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Passes the  with over 200 references. The event is notable and relevant
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: It may be worth considering only linking protests that have articles themselves, otherwise this  article has a  problem. A gathering  of 50 people three days ago that was covered by one newspaper is not long-term notable, but large gatherings may be
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:IINFO)

Comment: Although the name is apparently wrong for the present contents of the article, the list of locations does seem encyclopedic, although almost certainly outdated by the time we see it.   and  apply, but don't really make the article inappropriate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: this article;  and it's a ample-referenced list. BTW, rticles for deletion/Occupy San Jose|this may be of interest to those who have participated in this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:A)

Comment: Arthur Rubin wrote what I wanted to write, only better. The extensive citations prove notability and make it considerably higher quality than many lists on Wikipedia. If spam's a problem then |semi-protection, not deletion, is in order
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SEMI)

Comment: That's the deprecated  argument. We are not here to provide a bulletin board, we are here as a reference work
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (:WP:USEFUL)