Deletion of Asset voting

Comment: as ; there's no real question here - Wikipedia does not represent this kind of original work as encyclopedic content
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: as neologism. Only cited reference that actually mentions the term was by the person who coined it. No evidence of any |reliable sources independent of the person who originating the term actually using it... and discussion forums are not reliable sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Be careful about this AfD. See Special:Contributions/Yellowbeard. This is an |SPA dedicated to AfDing articles that are in some way connected to opposition to Instant-runoff voting, such as the theoretical basis for Range Voting Bayesian regret, the Center for Range Voting, etc. He often is technically correct, for example, CRV was probably not notable when he nominated it. However, many Voting systems articles are about topics well-known in the field, written by experts, and thus, as is common, improperly sourced. Removal of all this material leaves behind a POV imbalance. I'll make sure that relevant editors are informed of this AfD, what has often happened is that nobody familiar with the field notices the AfD. Asset Voting is indeed a recent term, a neologism, but the basic method is very old, it was first proposed by Lewis Carroll in the 1880s. If, on searching for sources, it turns out that the article material belongs elsewhere, what of it that can be established by reliable source, I may change my vote to Merge and Redirect. The modern inventor of Asset Voting is Warren Smith, of the Center for Range Voting, and he is notable in his field, probably should have an article. When Asset voting was created, Sarsaparilla was an editor in good standing, the block had to do with later events. Bringing in an ad hominem argument re an AfD is typical Yellowbeard behavior, see his contributions. Sorry to do that myself, but you really should know, he's sucked a lot of editors into quickly voting Delete without having any grasp of the context and details
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)