Deletion of Civil courage

Comment: Way beyond  at this point already. Re sourcing, it is lazily/unsuitable done at this point, but if you look at the German article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zivilcourage, of which this seems to be a straight port, you will see that there's actually a lot of sources - none inline, as they sadly insist on doing on deWiki; but this is without doubt a notable concept
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:DICTDEF)

Comment: Nominating reviewer) - I did the cursory searches before nominating. While there may be some info in DeWiki (I'm not German and cannot speak the language), no obvious results in my google search for English lang. secondary sourcing seriously validated this as a notable concept beyond a dictionary def. Also as an English Wikipedia editor and reviewer, I'm not primarily concerned with what other wikis say about it per . I'm also not convinced that its widespread use as a concept in German, even if sufficiently sourced in German, makes it suitable for an EnWiki article, unless perhaps it is frequently used in translated English language secondary academic sources. Currently there's no evidence of this on the page, nothing secondary has been contributed to the page and nothing is readily available to validate its fork from courage, where people may feasibly be looking for information on the term "civil courage" and to where this page should redirect
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:USERGEN)

Comment: this is an over-write of a redirect and this content could very easily have been integrated into :Courage. The standards of en.Wikipedia differ from its German counterpart and I am not in a position to judge the merits of the german version. However, here it has no independent sourcing to establish notability and fails . It reads like  and is an unneeded fork. '''''&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:OR)