Deletion of Paul Thompson (researcher)

Comment: notability is not adequately sourced; needs to cite at least one source "published by a reliable publisher". Terror Timeline is a primary source. "We may not use primary sources whose information has not been made available by a credible publication."  See 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The article says nothing about the notable status of the subject, save that he is a world traveller and has written something pertaining to 9/11.  The substance of the article appears to be a critique of the subjects' published timeline of 9/11.  This critique violates  and should be '''cleaned up''' to conform to WP standards.  I would find it hard to vote either way on the subject of the article, as it doesn't include any facts upon which to base a judgement.  Could more facts be provided by the author or another editor, please
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: as published author with an audience of more than 10,000 as per |the policy. His book fluctuated between 30,000 and 40,000 on Amazon.com's sales ratings, and as such likely has the audience noted above. NPOV issues are almost never grounds for deletion. That's what editing is for
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)

Comment: Article needs improvement through consensus editing.  It does not meet |Wikipedia deletion criteria
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DP)