Deletion of Quinn Slobodian

Comment: The article needs updating and improvement, but Slobodian's work is widely reviewed, making him an easy pass of #3. For example, ''Globalists'' was reviewed in ''The New Republic'' https://newrepublic.com/article/147810/worlds-apart-neoliberalism-shapes-global-economy, ''Dissent'' https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/neoliberalism-world-order-review-quinn-slobodian-globalists, ''Areo'' https://areomagazine.com/2018/11/25/a-review-of-quinn-slobodians-globalists-the-end-of-empire-and-the-birth-of-neoliberalism/, ''The American Historical Review'' https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/118/3/955/46386, etc. ''Foreign Front'' was reviewed in ''Journal for the Study of Radicalism'' https://muse.jhu.edu/article/522564, ''Journal of Contemporary History'' https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022009414550269m, etc. Again, article definitely needs to be improved, but there's no problem here that deletion solves
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: I agree the subject is a probably a bit  for NPROF, however he does seem to pass NAUTHOR
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: as per Girth Summit, was ready to vote delete as per , but the book reviews make me change due to 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NACADEMIC||WP:NAUTHOR)

Comment: I thought about nominating this for deletion myself, as the subject doesn't pass ; however, I'm persuaded that he would pass , as his 2018 book in particular has been the subject of several substantial reviews in relevant publications. Unless we're saying that academics have to pass  ''in addition to'' other criteria, I think this is a keep
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPROF||WP:AUTHOR||WP:NPROF)