Deletion of U. Diane Buckingham

Comment: as this meets  as well as the  exceptions (possibly several of the criteria). Lack of citations in third party press ultimately leads to the weak end of keep though
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NACADEMIC)

Comment: per ; an individual with notable accomplishments is not in need of passing NPROF also.  Here we have multiple independent reliable sources.  Publishing papers is not the only thing that makes a person notable, particularly when they are a field worker out in the trenches
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: The ''Black Enterprise'' source looks pretty spammy, and I don't see accomplishments that would pass : her citations are too low for #C1, and head of the psychiatry section of the National Medical Association doesn't seem enough given our article on that organization's admission of its "rather marginal size". But the NLM profile goes a long way towards : we don't have to agree with their selection criteria to recognize that it is reliably and prominently published, independent, and in-depth. https://books.google.com/books?id=BkKtaTeqGx0C&pg=PA37 This book provides another source (not as high quality, but enough to satisfy the part about having multiple sources
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)