Deletion of Carmel Moore (2nd nomination)

Comment: per , as an article about a living person with no reliable sources mentioning her. There is no need to worry about whether the ''Daily Mail'' and/or ''The Guardian'' are reliable, because neither mentions the subject. Special:Contributions/86.17.222.157|86.17.222.157
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)

Comment: after following along with the nom's analysis it is clear this subject, and noticing the supposed reliable sources do not provide significant coverage, I can see this fails GNG and therefore BLP. And I guess I shouldn't be surprised by the underhanded activities recounted by the nom. As a BLP, according to ,  it ''must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies: Neutral point of view (NPOV), Verifiability (V), No original research (NOR)...contentious material about living persons...that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP)