Deletion of Mega Society

Comment: per nom and Byrgenwulf; it is a non-notable club.  (The magazine titles cited by Canon are not enough to establish notability.)  IMHO, it seems that Byrgenwulf is the only editor who has expressed an opinion on this that is coherent with Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy.  AfD ''is not'' a vote.  HowlinWolf's comments should not have been struckthrough, even if he is a suspected sock puppet of DaturaS.  Everyone's comments are welcome, provided that they are |civil, and everyone's comments will be taken into account by the closing admin.  That being said, the closing admin does hold the right to discount comments made by anonymous IPs and accounts created for the sole intent of "voting" in this discussion (which appears to apply to the majority of the comments here).  Please keep this in mind on the off-chance anyone here has plans to participate in future AfD discussions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Civility (WP:CIVIL)

Comment: per . A 25-member group is too small for our article standards. --SlgrWikipedia:Esperanza|@ndson
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: This is one of the saddest-looking AFDs I have seen in a while. A lot of people seem to have forgotten that Wikipedia is |neither a soapbox or a battleground, and I can't help suspecting there's some |vanity involved here. Setting that all aside, the references I've seen don't for me establish enough |verifiable, |notable information that I think we can make a good article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:VAIN||WP:V||WP:N)