Deletion of Arizona Acres Mobile Home Resort, Arizona

Comment: per  and
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: USGS designation is NOT legal recognition of the place. Legal recognition means that a law has been passed creating a place (a village, city, town, etc.)  Just being in the UGGS database is not legal recognition.  By that logic, every individual street that exists on a government map would be a legally recognized populated place.  The USGS definition of a populated place is "a named community with a permanent human population, usually not incorporated and with no legal boundaries, ranging from rural clustered buildings to large cities and every size in between; includes metropolitan areas, housing subdivisions, developments, modular home communities, and named neighborhoods (village, town, settlement, hamlet, trailer park, etc.). The boundaries of most communities classified as Populated Place are subjective and cannot be determined."  Per , populated places fall into two categories: legally recognized which are presumed notable and legally unrecognized which which require coverage in reliable independent source.  It goes on to give examples of such areas as "subdivisions, business parks, housing developments, informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods, etc."  This trailer park clearly is in the latter
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Per : "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low." By definition, the USGS designation is legal recognition of the place. And the USGS listing gives the location the definition of a "populated place". There is nothing, as the nominator claims, in Geoland which says that a populated place which meets the main requirement of Geoland must also show independent notability if it is located within a city/town
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Actually, that's incorrect. USGS is a legal entity of the US Government, which recognizes the existence of the populated place. Your comment regarding streets is patently absurd. On the list of USGS definitions, can you point out where what you purport is the case?  (Here's a hint, it doesn't: http://geonames.usgs.gov/apex/f?p=136:8 USGS Definitions). What you state above would fall under , since it is your interpretation of what would constitute a "legal recognition". Take care
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)