Deletion of Criticism of Wikipedia (4th nomination)

Comment: I don't see anything wrong with the article. It definitely seems like a |pointy nomination. The article complies with NPOV as best I can tell and is properly sourced. What else could you want
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)

Comment: This (And the other articles) are notable enough to warrant separate topics about them. I don't see these article's as PoV forks, but rather as seperate articles to cover a certain aspect about the companies in question. These articles are simply to long to include into the main article, and are therefore forked. As far as i can see, the article comply to  more or less, and are properly sourced
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)