Deletion of List of women who sparked a revolution

Comment: Per objections here, I moved three inconsistent examples (Queen Elizabeth ''stops'' a revolution, ticket given to Tunisian man causes ''him'' to burn himself alive, and a clothing strike) to the article's talk page.  I think the content is now consistent with the title, and a no-brainer for a great list.  I hesitate to invoke communo-political grounds as Genevieve did, and it would be an  argument to find a list of men who wore pants into battle anyway--but I think there's something really useful about this kind of content, and since each individual piece is significant enough to be included at an article, the list is just a good vehicle to help readers pull together a theme.  There's no question that the role of women in history is chronically underestimated and underreported.  Assuming we can get the criteria to better match the examples, as I think we're close to doing, why wouldn't we have this list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERSTUFF)

Comment: The objections seem mostly to arise from the title, and even the nominator concedes that the subject of women who took the lead in military actions is notable enough for its own category, :Category:Women in war.  Categories are fine for people who have time to do the "what's under this rock?" method of looking at one article after another until they locate whatever they were looking for, but a list provides at-a-glance information that a category simply can't give.  Fortunately, it's not a matter of having to choose between a category only or a list page only, .  In that the role of women in the history of war is an important topic that's under-represented, a general page should be available on the subject, whether it's a list or a narrative
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates (WP:CLN)