Deletion of The Ripley

Comment: because Wikipedia is not a  summary. No sources to  or provide anything significant outside of a summary of the book or film
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PLOT||WP:verify notability)

Comment: The article relies exclusively on |primary sources, and even then, one is the film adaptation of the book. It does not have |notability since there are no #Reliable sources and notability|reliable third-party sources independent of the subject about the fictional creature ''The Ripley''. There is no significant coverage from reliable sources to presume that the topic meets the |general notability guideline and, on top of that, the article is a |plot-only description of a fictional work so there are no valid reasons to keep the it around
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:PRIMARY||WP:N||WP:V||WP:GNG||WP:PLOT)