Deletion of DZUP (2nd nomination)

Comment: The notability test for a radio station is not passed just because the article ''says'' it's passed — it's passed only when its claims to passage are ''supported'' by |reliable source coverage ''about'' the station in media ''other'' than itself. But of the seven footnotes here, five are to the university's own web page (which is still a directly affiliated primary source, and not support for notability), and the ''Rappler'' source is still a press release from the station itself (so still not support for notability). And the last one, ''PeriodismoHumano'', is a citizen journalism project that allows ''anybody'' to submit their own personal journalism about ''anything'', and thus still not valid support for notability because that type of publication can be (and often is) misused by people and organizations to ''game'' our rules by ''creating'' their own "media coverage" about themselves. The notability test for a radio station is not passed by what an article ''says'', it's passed by how well the article can ''reference'' what it says to ''media'' coverage it ''didn't'' create itself — and the sources here simply aren't cutting it at all. So this can certainly be mentioned in the article on the university, as is standard for student radio stations, but these sources aren't adequate to earn it a standalone article ''separately'' from being mentioned in the university's article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WP:ORG is not an appropriate guideline for this nom. Meets  and  easily
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST||WP:STUDENTMEDIA)