Deletion of Forever (website)

Comment: The sources from the ''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'', the ''Detroit Free Press'', and the ''Pittsburgh Tribune-Review'' are all major regional newspapers that provide significant coverage of the subject so  and Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline are met.Any promotional issues are minor and can be addressed through normal editing, not deletion. Wikipedia:Editing policy#Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required and Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Surmountable problems
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD)

Comment: coverage presented above does not meet  and is strictly local and |run-of-the-mill: "local company does well", not much more than this. Does not rise to the level of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUD||WP:MILL||WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: The sourcing ''looks'' good at a glance, but as nominator notes, it's a single local paper. And the tone of the article is blatantly promotional and has me reaching for the . I'd like much better sourcing before saying "keep", and even then it still needs a non-promotional rewrite
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: Plenty of non-trivial coverage from sources that easily meet , including Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Detroit Free Press, and Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Meets  based on sourcing from http://www.post-gazette.com/business/technology/2014/01/15/Forever-com-guards-personal-memories-from-prying-eyes.html Pittsburgh Post Gazette, http://triblive.com/business/headlines/4184417-74/com-forever-meakem Pittsburgh Tribune Review, and http://www.freep.com/story/life/family/kristen-jordan-shamus/2016/01/30/forever-ceo-business-saving-memories/78507546/ Detroit Free Press
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)