Deletion of William Rivers Pitt (3rd nomination)

Comment: per  based on the multiple reviews of his works. Thanks to Eppstein above for incorporating them into the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Im not sure this guy passes .  The previous 2 AfD's for this article mention that he was a NYT best seller, although that is not actually a criteria that exists in .  Aside from that, a few modestly successful books and an unremarkable journalism career dont make for notability, IMO
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR||WP:BIO)

Comment: It looks like he co-authored one well-received book and then kind of faded away with more books that fewer and fewer people read. But I improved the article so that it has one reliably-published profile on Pitt himself and five reviews of his first two books. I think that's enough to make a case for , though not a strong one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:AUTHOR)