Deletion of Mathew Chuk (2nd nomination)

Comment: while I would normally outright vote delete for student politicians... the Chuk article certainly has enough references which are clearly about this guy that he meets . This article has moved well past the point where it should be deleted simply because the creator of the article asked nicely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: I too share the viewpoints expressed by GarrieIrons, that I would generally vote to delete without losing any sleep. However, notability has been established in line with the accepted standard, it's referenced well, and despite some MOS issues it's reasonably well written. Sounds to me like this article has been moved for deletion on  grounds, which is far from an acceptable justification
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)