Deletion of List of references in Overwatch

Comment: this collection of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fancruft (WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: Article easily falls under 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMETRIVIA)

Comment: This is becoming a  situation. Trivial and not notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOW)

Comment: As it currently stands, we have an unwieldy list of entries amounting to "this line is similar to that line", some of which are probably deliberate, some of which are less so, and some of which would seem to be a bit fanciful (a former manager of mine used to say "Once more into the breach" towards the end of long days, and I know for a fact she wasn't quoting Shakespeare). These claims are supported by sources of dubious reliability (per , this is an important consideration regardless of one's personal feelings, and more so in the days of "alternative facts") and it seems as though the company responsible for the game itself won't confirm any of this anyway, reading through the discussion here, which rather damages the chances of reliable sourcing ever happening. There are other venues on the internet for such discussions of "references to stuff" to be made
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: WP:OR|Original research, fails to meet |notability criteria for stand-alone lists, a clear example of |fancruft, |gamecruft, |listcruft, and |trivia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NLIST||WP:FAN||WP:GAMECRUFT||WP:LISTCRUFT||WP:TRIV)

Comment: as per  and . Only source is youtube which gives it away the whole article is original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTRIVIA||WP:FANCRUFT)

Comment: one giant collection of . This is the type of stuff we strip out of articles, let alone have dedicated articles for. We're an encyclopedia, not TV Tropes
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:GAMECRUFT)

Comment: Maybe such an article is possible if appropriate sources were available, but the existing article is uncited fancruft.  Example: {{tq|The "Jail" spray, available for all heroes, has the caption "Go directly to jail", which is a reference to the "GO TO JAIL" card in the original 1933 board game Monopoly.}} I mean, how stupid can you get???  at the very least
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)