Deletion of Reception of the iPad

Comment: The nominator seems to be suffering from a case of . is |not temporary. The iPad was a product that no one expected, thus an article on its reception. This article is very out-of-date because it includes very little coverage on the iPad 2 and none on the just released third gen iPad. Given the |too-large size of the main article, more information needs to be  from that article to this one to get its size down to a reasonable level. The argument of "|It has only had 27 edits in the past year" is not a argument for deletion, because |there is no deadline for "finishing" the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTABILITY||WP:NTEMP||WP:SIZE||WP:SPLIT||WP:NOEFFORT||WP:DEADLINE)