Deletion of Tabletop Simulator

Comment: Only good sources are the Rock Paper Shotgun link and http://www.entertainmentbuddha.com/tabletop-simulator-shows-amazing-potential-for-game-night-fun/ this Entertainment Buddha article, but it's so likely to have more coverage in such a short time that I think  can overrule 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL||WP:CRYSTALBALL)

Comment: per . There is one reliable source covering this: two paragraphs posted on RPS. I don't believe the Entertainment Buddha source is reliable. For one, it's written by https://www.linkedin.com/pub/raymond-porreca/48/788/293 a 2010 college grad who up until a year ago had only worked retail and appears to have no other experience in the gaming industry before being made Managing Editor of the website. Does anyone seriously believe this is a reliable source? Because I'd like to hear your reasoning. People in this AfD say "the source'''s''' available" or "seems well sourced". I don't consider one short RPS article to be "notable media coverage in the references". GNG requires ''significant coverage'' in ''multiple'' sources. If this article is kept due to having only two paragraphs on RPS, I think that would be a very low bar for inclusion, and I don't think we need to ignore all rules every time RPS posts two paragraphs on their website
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: The sources available now aren't great, but they're not nothing, and we may as well keep the page so we don't almost inevitably have to recreate it later (
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: as above, while there are "sources", there's not multiple examples from reliable secondary sources, as needed by the 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Seems well sourced, out of beta isn't a reason for deletion (as far as I know, Fruit Ninja Frenzy will always be in beta, for example), and will continue to expand as the game gets more coverage. It's not , even if it's an early date for the article to be created in relation to the game
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: No sources cover this in depth at all other that  style "look at this thing" announcements
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)