Deletion of Benn Jordan (2nd nomination)

Comment: as I believe http://www.delamar.de/musikbusiness/geklauter-song-erfolgreich-16861/ this German music magazine article and https://torrentfreak.com/artist-cant-get-pirated-music-off-itunes-google-and-microsoft-stores-121016/ this TorrentFreak article, combined with the Chicago Tribune article, suffices to push him ''just'' over the  threshold. However, I see that there also seems to be a |walled garden of another 9 or so articles related to his works, none of which seem to assert sufficient notability for keeping, and which should probably all be deleted, even if this article passes review
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:WALLED)

Comment: Firstly, the criteria is . He needs to meet just one of the 12 criteria there. One such is "Has won or been nominated for a major music award". He has been winner of a London International Awards. So notability is not an issue. What's more concerning is why a deletion notice by a single-purpose vandal account (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Musicchief007) is even being entertained
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MUSIC)

Comment: He is close to passing  by virtue of the Chicago Tribune article alone. However, it is only a local newspaper for this artist. Any similar source from outside of Illinois would sway my vote
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)