Deletion of Molly Kingsbury

Comment: Fails |GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (sports). There is a lack of |notability because of a lack of sourcing. To me there is something wrong with the idea of supporting the creation (or the keeping) of an undersourced  using mainly |primary sources that produces a stub |pseudo biography. "Just" making an appearance at a national or international event, leading to a stand-alone article on Wikipedia, is dependant on Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. rimary|Primary sources do not advance notability so secondary sources are required. Usually placing 4th or 6th place may create some immediate fame but notability is not fleeting or passing. Only the individual, family, team members, or Wikiprojects will remember someone placing 4th or 6th. This seems to be forgotten sometimes in a quest to have all possible subjects covered on Wikipedia. This subject has three references and two are primary with one (BBC) secondary for the one event. This lack of sourcing fails several instances of the |"Five pillars": ''"All encyclopedia#characteristics|articles must strive for Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable accuracy, |citing |reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons"'', so these watered down exemptions ("it fails several policies or guidelines but passes WP:NTRACK so we should keep") should not matter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:BLP||WP:PSEUDO||WP:P||WP:5P2||WP:CS||WP:RS||WP:notability||WP:primary)

Comment: Passes  #2, which explicitly lists the Commonwealth Games as meeting the criteria. If people feel that isn't really the case, they can discuss it at the appropriate WikiProject to have it removed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK)

Comment: fails , possibly 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:A7)

Comment: I could not find any sources after trying for quite awhile so fails  and subsequently also fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NTRACK)

Comment: Satisfies  as she has finished in sixth (therefore top 8) in a Commonwealth Games. This looks quite clear to me. I don't know why there is debate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NTRACK)