Deletion of The Longjohn Flap

Comment: and add more real world context and criticism, this one needs to be expanded not deleted. We need to avoid a bias toward recentism. I don't see any difference between this MASH episode an a random Seinfeld episode, for example: The Postponement. Seinfeld has episodic plot outlines as well as season summaries. We also need to move the images to the seasonal outlines. And prophylacticly if your going to cite  please keep in mind the newer 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS||WP:DONTQUOTEPERSONALESSAYSASPOLICY)

Comment: These episodes are mentioned in numerous books and notable sites, which I will add here shortly. This should have been discussed on the Talk:List_of_M*A*S*H_episodes_(Season_1) instead of a mass deletion spree of 24 articles, per . In reagrds to guidelines about this, WP:FICT, a proposed guideline to address episodes  failed for the third time. WP:PLOT is being seriously attacked, so much so the page is protected for 2 weeks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Editing policy (WP:PRESERVE)

Comment: Articles do not need to make claims of importance - that's why we have numerous articles about obscurities such as Hydnum rufescens.  I have added two citations to the article which wasn't difficult - just a matter of looking - and so the comments are now obsolete.  See  and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:NOEFFORT||WP:BEFORE)

Comment: Sources added establish notability, as defined at .  More real-world content is needed, but that's an editorial issue, not a deletion rationale
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)