Deletion of List of channels on Sky

Comment: per 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Under . These are not encyclopedic topics and Wikipedia is not meant to be a universal repository of all trivia. There is a place for current TV directories; this is not it
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: the actually nominated articles per , and as failing . This does not include the "otherstuffexists" listing of other irrelevant things such as the lists of actual television station in a nation or a US state and templates related to TV which were  introduced in an obfuscatory and disruptive manner by 12.153.112.21
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR||WP:N)

Comment: obviously for violating  (part of ) and because consensus in prior AFDs said so. Shall I go on further just to avoid violating the essay 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTTVGUIDE||WP:NOTDIR||WP:AADD)

Comment: per , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels, and the comments I've made at those pages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: Sounds like a  broken record in here.  But seriously, Edison, postdlf, and Tarc have said it all
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR)

Comment: or redirect to a "List of channels in nation", e.g. List of channels on Sky Deutschland to List of television stations in Germany. Although in my experience the latter can become awkward to edit and read, a case of  I guess. Under  lists can be kept if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic. In the case of Sky (UK and Ireland), there is evidence that prominent listings on Sky can increase viewership by a significant amounthttp://www.feh-mi.com/blog/from-mtv-to-sky-arts-the-long-term-value-of-epg-prominence/http://www.cable.co.uk/news/sky-reveals-epg-shuffle-boosts-mtv-and-sky-living-ratings-801345201/http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/broadcasters/epg-slots-concern-local-tv-bidders/5042009.article and failure to gain any listing or carriage can cause in the closure of a channel altogether.http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/a9725/carlton-cinema-to-close-march.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2002/dec/18/broadcasting1http://current.com/shows/upstream/93612707_statement-current-uk-due-to-close-in-march.htmhttp://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2010/06/01/music-choice-leaves-sky-after-15-years
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:TOOLONG||WP:NOTDIR)