Deletion of Mecon (science fiction convention)

Comment: as nominator is mass-nominating a long list of science fiction conventions with the same cookie-cutter rationale, not grounded in facts or policy, without regard to content or sourcing (plus List of science fiction conventions), apparently as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MystiCon|this discussion. |Notability is ''not'' a competition to "stand out from all the others". With 13 articles nominated for deletion in 19 minutes, I'd like to assume in good faith that the nominator thoroughly investigated each article, searched for sources, and worked to improve the article, as per , but at less than 2 minutes per article nominated I do have to question ''how'' thorough any research might have been. It appears the nominator is making a 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BEFORE||WP:POINT)

Comment: despite the fact that some of my most favorite authors have been guest of honor there (James White, Peter Hamilton). However, as has been pointed out, notability is not inherited. If this meeting is (was, it seems moribund) so important, then why are there no sources? (Those currently in the article are indeed "very limited"). Are there not even articles in local newspapers covering this event? There are SF sources that are  (''Locus'', for instance). Didn't they ever report on this event? It is not true that mainstream media will ignore this kind of events, although their reporting sometimes is more like "look what those nerdy weirdo's have come up with again"... But that is still coverage and even that is missing here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: Alright, basically the issue here is whether this convention meets the , since there is no form of inherent notability given to science fiction conventions, nor is there inherited notability from famous people attending something (there are god knows how many charity functions, conventions, and events that can get a notable keynote speaker but are still utterly non-notable. So basically it comes down to the sources here, including the ones which have been added by Dravecky. I'll try to go through them one by one
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)