Deletion of IPhone 12

Comment: or if you prefer more colourful language; '''Burn it with fire'''. This is absolutely a violation of / based on unverified speculation in dubious niche sources; none of which is encyclopedic information until, at the very least, we get an official statement from the manufacturer
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: per above. To respond briefly to the argument about it not being a violation of : I could reasonably see that ''perhaps'' speculation of this sort might be notable in iPhone. It's absolutely not notable enough for its own article. Nothing about this is officially known - including its very existence - so, unless and until it alone meets , it fails the first sentence of CRYSTAL in my view. {{tq|Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation or presumptions
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:V)

Comment: content per , create as '''Redirect''' to iPhone and '''Protect''' from editing
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTALBALL)