Deletion of Caroline Chisholm High School

Comment: per , as it has sufficient information from independent reliable sources to meet content requirements for its own article (and there's sufficent info available to expand further
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCH)

Comment: per precedent and 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCH)

Comment: or '''Merge''' into school district or town if article is both below three sentances and lacks any sort of illustration, boxed info-template or picture when AFD is closed. This school, like all others, is an important public institution and should be written about somewhere, even if it cannot sustain an article on it's own. Presently people do create school articles containing neutral, verifiable information and it is impossible to delete them, even though many have a desire to do so. Rather than striving for an impossible consensus to delete any given school article, I feel it is always preferable and takes much less energy to merge the text of the article into an article about a suitable habitation or administrative unit: a city, county or state, or a school district of local education authority of other school system, while taking care not to delete the information contained in the article. If the article is merged, the current location should be replaced by a redirect, and the edit history maintained for future use. This is the baseline consensus that I feel was reached at 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCH)

Comment: as obvious consensus to keep.  I'm sticking with the  consensus on high schools, despite my own personal feelings
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SCH)