Deletion of Danger, Will Robinson

Comment: There's some material out there, although I'm having a hard time finding it reaches signficant coverage of the phrase, one paragraph in an apparently self-published book notwithstanding. Still, surely a merge or partial merge to Robot B-9 would be of more preferable outright deletion, per , and I don't see an argument against retention via merge. Moreover, the cultural impact of the phrase *is* part of the cultural impact of the show, I'm mystified as to why combined coverage would be seen as a negative here--for our readers, I would expect it to be a benefit, not a drawback
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: Considering that the article is about a catchphrase and rest of it is trivia about usage, I guess  applies here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:NAD)

Comment: to Lost in Space. It's relevant and notable in terms of the show's enduring legacy, not on its own. The article at present doesn't pass  because none of the sources extend to significant coverage of the term besides its use in other media, which isn't enough to sustain notability for the phrase itself with an article
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary (WP:WORDISSUBJECT)