Deletion of Boxing in Latin America

Comment: against proper recreation. Although the absence of improvement in 4 years can be overlooked per , I think a more important question is: If an editor wanted to improve this article, would the current content of the article be useful for this purpose? Given the state of the article—short, incomplete and unreferenced—the answer is "no", and so there is no reason to keep the page. A list of boxers certainly could be viable (I disagree, however, that "references wouldn't be needed" for a list), but :Category:Boxers by nationality would be a much better starting-point than this article.One point to consider, if anyone wants to improve or recreate this article, is whether the combination of "Latin American" and "boxer" (as opposed to say, "Central/South American" and "boxer") is appropriate. In the world of boxing, are there regional boxing associations or competitions for Latin America, or is the intersection of "Latin American" and "boxer" a topic of academic or popular interest? If the answer to both questions is "no", then we should not have a list for the intersection
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)

Comment: Would this be better as List of Latin American Boxers?  That is essentially what it is.  As to not being improved in 4 years, |that doesn't matter, although references would be swell if left as is.  As a list, references wouldn't be needed and it is a reasonable way to list boxers, by geographic area
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:There is no deadline (WP:DEADLINE)