Deletion of ServerAxis

Comment: an unremarkable private company. 90% of the content is about the outage. If the outage were notable (of which I'm not convinced, see ) then an article should be created on that. Otherwise, nothing stands out about this one and coverage is insufficient to meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:CORPDEPTH)

Comment: similar to a bio 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: okay, delete first, and then redirect at editorial discretion. There's no need to keep the article history as it's strictly  content
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)

Comment: no need to merge/redirect). This is pretty much . A bit of coverage about the server outage is the only thing available. I am opposed to merging it as it was not a notable downtime/outage. These kind of outages are routine for companies and Wikipedia would become a repository of trivia if we start keeping information about random outages
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: still delete, fails 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (:WP:NOTNEWS)

Comment: The article text concerns a single incident's impact on other organisations and my own searches are finding nothing better. Fails  #2 and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (:WP:NOTNEWS||:WP:CORPDEPTH)