Deletion of Isaac Asimov's Robot City: Refuge

Comment: WP:PLOT seems like a problem here.  Overly detailed plot summary and nothing else.   would be needed with significant coverage of this specific novel, not just a mention that substantiates its existence or provides only a synopsis.  Might be better off handled by smerging to Isaac Asimov's Robot City as suggested above and not giving it undue weight.   is at the moment a best practice guideline, one that is indeed usually advisable to follow, although not a formal guideline or policy.  A nomination can't "fail ."  Making it a guideline or policy is something that's been discussed, I believe, something I might myself support.   states "for group nominations it is often a good idea to only list one article at afd and see how it goes, before listing an entire group."  I did a big bundle of articles all of the same kind with the same problems, and I'm not sure if it was the best way to go about it.  Either way, somebody will have an objection.  It seems odd that  suggests a trial balloon, implying that one might use it as precedent, when precedent isn't exactly respected.  It's hard to figure WP out sometimes
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:BEFORE||WP:BUNDLE)

Comment: I had no difficulty finding and adding a source to the article.  No consideration seems to have been given to alternatives to deletion such as merger with Isaac Asimov's Robot City and there is no discussion at the article.  The nomination thus fails |our deletion policy
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE)