Deletion of List of published lists

Comment: Ignoring the reason for nomination, which can't be supported (Wikipedia would be rather bare if we removed everything that was not TPA), I'll provide a comment as I consider this one.  Lists are always problematic when they become the subject of a deletion debate. My view is that they should be treated as encycopedic articles in their own right, so that they don't become a directory. This is consistent, I think, with . It's one thing to provide reliable verification for each individual entry in the list, but does the article's topic itself need to be verifiable? If so, do we need to verify (in this case) the concept of published lists, which after all is the article's subject? If so, how do we do that? Do we need to provide evidence that published lists are notable? I think the answer is "yes" to both questions and, accordingly, I'm leaning towards delete, but I'll need to give this one some more thought
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Lists (WP:LIST)

Comment: per .  The overly broad criteria for inclusion makes it hard for the contents to meet policies such as  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT||WP:IINFO||WP:OR)

Comment: WP:SALAT. An indiscriminate |listcruft with no clearly defined inclusion criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT)

Comment: per  as an indiscriminate list, at least as currently defined
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:SALAT)

Comment: I would agree with many of those that commented above, that the creation of this list-page indeed does appear to be a  violation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (WP:POINT)