Deletion of Garganta

Comment: or redirect - It's amazing to see someone so blatantly hypocritically try to downplay the nomination due to lack of care when his work on dePRODing articles is way more abysmal. ''The Superhero Book'' literally mentions the character twice with zero context, so that shows he didn't even look at the source before posting it. That aside, this fails to establish notability to satisfy 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Notice how the PROD and nomination are exactly the same as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeiss (comics)|Zeiss with no details, evidence or particulars of the topic that we are supposed to be discussing.  This character is interesting as an example of the giant woman type and so has been noticed in that context – see ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Modern_Amazons/NNGGDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0 The Modern Amazons''.  The character is part of the Femforce cast of characters and so naturally attracts notice in that context too – see ''https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Superhero_Book/RgVlCwAAQBAJ?hl=en The Superhero Book –The Ultimate Encyclopedia of Comic-Book Icons ''.  Per policy , the worst case would be merger into some more general page such as that and so deletion is not appropriate.  "''If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)