Deletion of Oath of Genesis

Comment: Fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Fails . The article is based on primary sources and only talks about gameplay, plot, story and release. The article has nothing to suggest that it is notable and a Google search did not help. &mdash;&nbsp
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NSOFT)

Comment: Right now this game does not pass notability guidelines. There has been no coverage of the game in any outlet, at least in any that we can verify. There is apparently a news article out there, but that one news article will not be enough to show notability for the game. I think that the best course of action right now is to move this to the draftspace at fC. Not only will this give the editor a chance to work on the article while more sources become available, but AfC will allow another editor to look at the article and approve it before it gets resubmitted to the mainspace
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A)

Comment: A case of 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON)

Comment: WP:TOOSOON, fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: I haven't found any coverage in reliable, third party sources to meet the . Additionally, as some others have pointed out, judging by the article creator and game creators same name, there's very likely some  and  issues here as well. (Sidenote: Also strange that all the characters of this game https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characters_of_the_Final_Fantasy_VII_series take character names from this game
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:COI||WP:PROMOTION)

Comment: No |evidence of |notability for this recently-published game. The  contributor is also the item's author and publisher
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:NSOFT||:WP:SPA)