Deletion of Emil Inc.

Comment: No signs of notability, the only argument in favor of keeping it seems to clash pretty hard with  and . Not to mention, the article's pretty barren as is anyway. I read it and felt like I learned little to nothing about this musician
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:External links (WP:ELNO||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: The |verifiable career certainly seems prolific, and I note that 's , , and #Others offer criteria that may be used to define notability even if not the subject of significant coverage. Perhaps the article's defenders can show which he meets? Or perhaps they may be willing to work on improving the article |off of mainspace
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:NMUSIC||WP:MUSICBIO||WP:COMPOSER||WP:NMUSIC||WP:USERFY)

Comment: No evidence of the level of notability specified in .  Please understand the difference between "notability" and mere popularity / talent / "awesomeness".  Also please read , , and related material on what sources are, or are not, useful for use in Wikipedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BAND||WP:RS||WP:INDY)