Deletion of List of African supercentenarians (2nd nomination)

Comment: per ; it's basically grouping people notable for one thing into a completely different category
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYN)

Comment: WP:BLP applies to everything said about any living person, whether it is in a biography, a paragraph of an article about an invention, the caption to a picture, a list, or even things written on talk pages. For example, if someone calls me a homophobe on the talk page of an article, without powerful reliable sources to back it up, that person is lucky to get off with just having the remarks collapsed. I use this example because Talk:Paul Baltes|it should be familiar to RY. So Edison is applying the correct standard.  Under that standard, this list fails. It relies on raw data, maintained as primary sources on websites that do not bear the indicia of |reliable sources. They are not reliable, as that term is defined on wikipedia, nor |verifiable as that one's defined. Deriving conclusions from raw data is prohibited |original research and |synthesis
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:NOR||WP:SYN)

Comment: WP is not the place for researchers to publish their |original research; what's more, the list appears to be #IINFO|indiscriminate, as the notability of this topic has not been demonstrated
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:NOT)