Deletion of Laura Lemay

Comment: as failing  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: She is absolutely an important figure in her field. She easily meets ; in particular, where it says "Criterion 4 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education." There are over 6K ghits when searching for http://www.google.com/search?q=%22laura+lemay%22+syllabus "Laura Lemay" syllabus, and most of those ghits are to colleges and universities where her books are/have been required texts
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ACADEMIC)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by .  Googling suggests they don't exist.  The subject is the author of series of WP:run-of-the-mill "how-to" books, which falls far, far, '''far''' short of the impact clearly anticipated by ,  or  as appropriate to a presumption of notability in lieu of sources
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:ACADEMIC||WP:PROF||WP:AUTHOR)

Comment: Inadequate coverage in mainstream published media (e.g. Google news archive) to pass  or , and  seems far out of reach
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:AUTHOR||WP:PROF)