Deletion of Aleksandar Ljubić

Comment: Well, the guy certainly '''is''' notable, http://www.blic.rs/vesti/drustvo/aleksandar-ljubic-imenovan-za-zamenika-sekretara-svetske-asocijacije-perinatalne/5x2yqth 2015http://www.biljeizdravlje.rs/code/navigate.php?Id=331&editionId=158&articleId=791 2005http://arhiva.glas-javnosti.rs/arhiva/2002/05/15/srpski/D02051402.shtml 2002http://www.kurir.rs/bez-panike-nije-nista-strasno-clanak-551219 2012, http://www.lepotaizdravlje.rs/zdravlje/lecenje-zdravlje/zdravljeufokusu2015-dr-aleksandar-ljubic-vantelesna-oplodnja-je-napredovala-i-sada-je-sve-manje-traumaticno/ 2015. The article is unsourced indeed, and might easily be a copyvio of something (it was created in a single swath), so  might be applicable
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)

Comment: A GS h-index of 11 fails rof#C1 in highly cited field of biomed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: per ; strictly advertorial. The hallmark of such articles is the ext link in the body, which we have plenty of here
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:PROMO)