Deletion of Stephen J. Clay

Comment: if you Google him per , there's actually more coverage of him, not much of it good.  Allegations of a sexual assault of a minor surfaced, although charges were never filed.  He also made a controversial power grab by cutting a deal with Republicans to appoint them to oversight committees so they could save him, before he was forced out. The Indianapolis Business Journal https://www.ibj.com/articles/67857-shabazz-good-riddance-to-the-horrific-reign-of-stephen-clay. CBS 4 Indianapolis https://cbs4indy.com/2018/01/31/city-county-council-president-stephen-clay-fires-attorney-clerk-in-wake-of-no-confidence-vote/, the Indy Star https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2018/01/21/groping-allegation-against-indianapolis-councilman-clay-referred-prosecutor-2004-report-shows/1051382001/, WTHR Channel 13 https://www.wthr.com/article/molestation-allegation-against-city-county-council-president-candidate-re-surfaces, and the Indianapolis Recorder http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/recorder_headlines/article_ae31476c-f164-11e7-9947-ab3ff06ca1e5.html all had coverage of him.  This isn't routine, but it is certainly local.  Since this never seemed to make it out of Indianapolis, the coverage is light on biographical profile info, and including the controversies could be construed as , I'll support a weak delete. It's not a slam dunk though
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:BEFORE||WP:UNDUE)