Deletion of Pedals the Bear

Comment: There are massive concerns regarding  issues if the article is kept.  states that "Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there are additional protections for subjects who are not public figures." The hunter's personal safety has to be taken into account. If the name of the hunter is ever added to the article people who are upset about the hunt could go to this article to learn their name and they might be subjected to the same sort of abuse as that of the hunter involved in the hunt of Cecil the Lion.  Due to the BLP violations that will occur if the article is kept the only sensible course of action is to delete
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP||WP:NPF)

Comment: This is just an |indiscriminate collection of news reports. Bear sighted, apparently named, walks on rear paws, gets killed during hunting season, end of story
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: per , ,  and . This is Wikipedia, not the Encyclopedia of Sensationalist News. To those who will say that the subject was notable before being shot, well, this project is not called Cuteness-pedia either. It should also be noted that since being nominated for deletion this article has been extensively revised and rewritten (to the point of having its title moved!) giving readers who are then directed to this page a false inflated sense of the article's importance. Although there is unfortunately no policy that prohibits such behavior, I would say that it is bad form for inclusionists to make such radical revisions to nominated articles to sway discussion towards keep before a consensus has been reached through the AfD process
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTNEWS||WP:SENSATION||WP:RECENTISM||WP:NOTSCANDAL)