Deletion of Brand.com

Comment: Passes  per in-depth coverage in http://qz.com/146874/this-company-promises-it-can-delete-slanderous-results-from-google-for-7500-and-up/ Quartz, http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/news/2013/06/26/reputation-changer-now-brandcom.html?page=all bizjournals, http://technical.ly/philly/2014/09/25/brand-com-google-penalty/ technical.ly, and https://techcrunch.com/2013/06/21/brands-brands-brands/ techchrunch. Some of other references are of no use for determining notability, but I think these ones are solid
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:CORP)

Comment: Whether the article was created by an SPA or not is immaterial for this discussion. I think the nom should focus on the merits whether it is notable or not. If it is heavily promotional then a rewrite to tone it down should be the next thing and if this can't rescue the article then  can be employed here
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:KIBOSH)