Deletion of Banishment in the Bible

Comment: as original research |synthesis. If you can find secondary sources that assert that this topic is one that has received critical analysis, then by all means start an article on the subject. However, "banishment" is just one of the many things that happens in the Bible and I cannot find any secondary sources which assert banishment is any more worthy an article than, say, Snakes in the Bible or Skullduggery in the Bible
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:SYNTH)

Comment: complete |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: I was really on the fence with this one.  First, I do not believe you could delete under copyright for the fact the Bible is not copyrighted.  If so, the Gideons International|Gideon's would be in a heap of trouble.  As for |original Research, you maybe able to make a small case.  But than again, is quoting the Bible original research and the author provides the source of the information?  Finally I looked at ist|Lists to see if it could fall under that category.  My personal feelings is that, as quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List#Information Guideline's; “…The list may be a valuable information source.”  In that this could be considered valuable information, in that it does provide a list of information that an individual may search for, it does meet with Wikipedia requirements.  Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:L)

Comment: per #INFO and because it's basically original research, with no evidence of widespread scholarly analysis of this subject
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)