Deletion of FocalScope Email Ticketing Solution

Comment: barely. I continued MrX' good work in cleaning out promotional content from the article. It is now quite short. I looked hard for references beyond those in the article and found none. Borsen looks like a reliable source. Most of the article is behind a paywall, but from the initial paragraph, it is likely in depth. The AisaOne article reads like a press release, but the Channel NewsAsia article reads like a news article, with discussion of privacy concerns about the monitoring aspects of the software. From the http://www.channelnewsasia.com/about/ about page, Channel NewsAsia looks like a TV news channel. I could believe that it is an independent, reliable news source. So there seem to be two reliable sources with enough depth for the topic, making it barely above threshold for general notability . A barely notable topic with an article that has been mostly neutralized with respect to promotional content suggests that the article should be kept, barely
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: just not enough coverage in |reliable sources to carry it over the threshold (and of course the very title is a violation of  (and of course 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (:WP:RS||:WP:PROMOTE||:WP:SOLUTION)

Comment: fails , insufficient sources to demonstrate notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)