Deletion of Jim Nelson

Comment: He fails  and , being notable neither as a politician nor an author.  This appears to be little more than a platform for spamlinks, violating .  If he's ever elected to anything important or ever writes anything notable, then he will merit an article
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:BK||WP:SPAM)

Comment: Candidates for a national legislature, even "nominees of a major party", are not considered notable per . Founding a non-profit is not notable, although founding a ''notable'' non-profit may be. Being an author is not notable. And while Google hits by themselves make a weak argument, the lack of reliable sources makes a rather strong one
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: Nominee of a major party for congress, founder of a nonprofit, author. At worst, would meet  while failing 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:POL)

Comment: He's an impressive dude, but seems to me that he doesn't meet a single  or  criteria, and there's no obvious |common-sense reason to override those policies
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:BIO||WP:UCS)