Deletion of Dr. Kenneth K. Kim

Comment: I can't judge the sources perfectly due to the limitations of Google Translate, but from what I can see there's probably enough here to pass : coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, if not particularly in-depth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: Per Cunard and others. The Korean-language sources provided look like enough for  from where I'm standing, if only by a small margin
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: per CaliforniaAliBaba. The sources presented in this AfD demonstrate that the subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria : ''A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.'' The http://www.koreatowndaily.com/read.php?id=20090612182751&section=local&type=fdb&ss=6 two http://www.koreatowndaily.com/read.php?id=20090526191041&section=local&type=fdb&ss=2 articles from the ''Korean Daily'' and the article by Allan Choi in the ''Korean Daily'' (the U.S. edition of ''JoongAng Ilbo'') provide nontrivial coverage of Kenneth K. Kim. Add these to http://www.koreatimes.com/article/520947 this article from ''The Korea Times'' and the other sources at ({{find|케네스 김}}) and notability is solidly established.I acknowledge that Kim doesn't pass ; however, the depth and breadth of coverage he has received in several Korean newspapers demonstrate that he has had a significant impact on his community&mdash;enough, in my opinion, to warrant inclusion on Wikipedia. This well-researched, carefully-crafted article by Peoples bio will help Wikipedia Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias|counter Wikipedia:Systemic bias|systemic bias on a non-English topic where sources are difficult to locate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: mdash; Clearly spam.  The article had a number of references to pages and articles not related to the article subject.  Those have been removed. They certainly did not support |notability nor do the remaining.  When I see examples of articles quotes to be added such as ""many people are going to see dr kim", "get a free consultation", and "beverly hills females impressed", I have to seriously question if the articles to be added meet 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:RS)