Deletion of Michael Harner

Comment: A GS h-index of 19 with some high cites in the area of religion (albeit pop religion) suffices to pass rof#C1
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Portal (WP:P)

Comment: based on the above. Google search suggests he's clearly well-known in his field, and apparently well-cited. I will note however that there seems to be much criticism of his work on the web which is not reflected in the article at all, suggesting a  and/or  issue. We should rectify this, but it's not criteria for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:SELFSOURCE||WP:NPOV)

Comment: The fringe nature of his research topic does nothing to negate the clear pass of #C1 evident in his citation record. And (e.g. from hits describing him as a highly influential pioneer in this area in highbeam) he also appears to pass 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:GNG)