Deletion of Tomasz Kupisz

Comment: player fails notability at . Recreate if and when he plays in a fully pro league/competition. Keeping an article on the basis that he might play in a couple of days time is |crystal ballery
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:CRYSTAL)

Comment: unneeded article about another youth footballer, clearly fails  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE||WP:FOOTYN)

Comment: per nom; fails . Can recreate when/if he become notable
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ATHLETE)

Comment: He doesn't pass thlete, and I can't find any evidence (nor do I see any evidence presented here) that suggests he otherwise passes .  If at some point in the future he does meet one of those, I won't oppose recreation
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Attribution (WP:A||WP:BIO)

Comment: You should read .  Keeping an article on the basis that he's going to play in the next few weeks ISN'T crystal ballery. A few months or years yes. The example there list events that we know will happen 2 years from now not being 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:CRYSTAL||WP:CRYSTAL)