Deletion of Xinsheng Ling

Comment: per nom, {{u|Espresso Addict}}. Fails . There's only ''one'' article that even comes ''close'' to |reliable, independent source coverage in the Boston BizJournal https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/mass-high-tech/2009/05/nabsys-nabs-4m-for-dna-sequencing.html here and even, ''then'', it may be non-qualifying trivial coverage. The two "keep" !votes are (a) reminded this is |not a vote and (b) that passing an SNG like  does ''not'' confer otability. It's more or less a rough guideline that, typically, professors are notable, but they are, expressly and unequivocally, '''not''' substitutes for . This professor has lots of co-author mentions in research papers and for writing chapters of textbooks, but there's nothing ''about'' him that is both ''in-depth'' and ''at length''. Thus, it's a hard '''delete'''. I don't see any other way this can close, to be honest; failing that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:RS||WP:NOTVOTE||WP:NPROF||WP:N||WP:GNG)

Comment: per . If there's any private information, such as a direct email/website, please identify and remove
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: Yes, Fellowship in the APS (easily verified https://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/archive-all.cfm?initial=&year=2005&unit_id=&institution= via their website) would qualify for wiki-notability per #C3. It would help to know why the creator wishes the article deleted, since it looks about as uncontroversial and boilerplate as his https://vivo.brown.edu/display/xling faculty profile
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)