Deletion of EBCDIC 389

Comment: I am still confused where does this show notability against wikipedia rules? soft It is long established that Wikipedia is not a primary source, nor a free wiki host. Wikipedia articles are not intended to be locations where primary source documentation for software packages is hosted, roduct - When discussion of its products and services would make the article unwieldy, some editorial judgment is called for. If the products and services are considered notable enough on their own, one option is to break out the discussion of them into a separate article following WP:Summary style. However I agree with DMCready, as the code needs to be retained, and without the code the EBDIC page is lacking the detail. However at the moment The code page is not exactly great. The code page covers more that just EBDIC, so making it way to long
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:P)

Comment: this and the many other similar codepage reproductions, per : this is not an encyclopedia article and so it does not belong in the encyclopedia
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)