Deletion of Oscar Dahlene

Comment: I was asked to reevaluate the article, and have done so. While it is true that an additional factoid (he was a college president for a few years too) and some sources have been added, it appears to be window dressing. The sources either (in a couple cases) have links which do not even work, and for those that do, mention the subject only in passing or trivially, or are primary. No substantial independent sources, ''no article''. So to be clear, I stand by my rationale of delete for the version of the article as of this writing, or any other, as it appears as far as I can find, ''substantial'' independent sourcing on this subject simply does not exist. A bunch of Wikiproject members |liking it does not change that
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: The question of broken links was not my main concern, and yes they all work now. My main point was that the "sources" are trivial, passing mentions, in several cases only name drops, in others offering only a sentence or so with no substance. ''Substantial'' sourcing is required to support a separate article, not just "the guy got mentioned here or there." If you could show me a source that goes into substantial depth ''about the man, not the team'', I would agree that a separate article on the man rather than a brief mention in the team's article is warranted. Otherwise, we should |follow our sources' lead, and do as they do, mentioning him only briefly in context of the team
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)