Deletion of CBPC-1

Comment: per  and moreso this: ''" On the other hand, licensed Travelers' Information Stations are generally not presumed notable, but might redirect to an article about the highway, park or tourist facility they cover, or about the company that operates them if that company meets 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST||WP:CORP)

Comment: the |presumption of notability for broadcast stations does not apply to unlicensed stations such as Canadian tourist information stations (they still need technical authorization from Industry Canada, but that's not sufficient enough for our purposes) — and tourist information stations in general aren't presumed to be notable even when they ''do'' have a license. It's also noteworthy that while the CBC http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2007/db2007-280.pdf requested license revocation in 2007 for its park information stations, the exemption they confirmed their eligibility for actually http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2003/pb2003-35.htm dates back to ''2003''. These also aren't the type of stations that will ever get the sufficient coverage in |reliable sources to satisfy the |general notability guideline
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BROADCAST||WP:RS||WP:GNG)