Deletion of Rand Kannenberg

Comment: per DoriSmith officially, and personally because of the incessant  promotion by suspected sockpuppets/meatpuppets
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Single-purpose account (WP:SPA)

Comment: I don't see |reliable source references in general; there are a few that may make it over the line, but if one limits oneself to those it becomes even more difficult to establish notability, which, as editors above have argued, is already a problem. Also, I agree that this is not NPOV
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: No real |reliable source refs, even the CO papers have given more trivial mention for a comedy club than for his role in CJAS. This has got to be one of the most absurd GA nominations ever. I'm surprised that the article has stayed under the radar for two years
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS)

Comment: The new version of the article is now more focussed and readable, but would still need major work - in its near frantic attempt to assert notability it is full of |peacock terms and is not written from a |neutral point of view - indeed neutrality is further brought into question by the removal of the criticism section which existed before. But this is irrelevant because ultimately the subject is simply not notable per Dori and others, and no amount of work on the article is going to fix that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:PEACOCK||WP:NPOV)