Deletion of Arsenal F.C. supporters (2nd nomination)

Comment: Football fans are a cultural group, and indeed with the decline of trade unions, political parties and organised religions it could be argued that football represents the last mass 'group identity' culture in the UK. The traditions of a particular group of football fans therefore represent, in principle at least, a suitable subject for an encyclopedia article provided that there is sufficient encyclopedic, verifiable (etc. etc.) information available to justify having a separate article as opposed to a 'fans' section in the main club article. The 'notable fans' section really strikes me as no different from a 'notable alumni' section on a school or university article. The article is well-sourced (though a minority of those sources probably fail  and ) and worth having
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV||WP:V)

Comment: I would like ask Student7, he says that it fails objective criteria of noteworthiness. I would ask that since  says that articles must be "worthy of notice", would he count being the first to do something as worthy of notice
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: Like Govvy, I am against merging as that would make the other article too big, but then I'm thinking that this is a notable . The "deleters" have a point regarding the  list of random people who support the same team, but if we remove that list we still got a notable topic with lot of potential for a decent article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Content forking (WP:SPINOFF)

Comment: Per 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)