Deletion of List of Trinidadian English terms (second nomination)

Comment: and move relevant entries to Wiktionary. This article is, quite simply, a flagrant policy violation as a list of dictionary definitions.  is unambiguous on this. We don't take dicdefs and we don't take lists of dicdefs. Lists like Canadian English words (which itself should go through an AfD since it has been source-tagged for months) are at least in part lists of blue links, and as such acceptable as quick references. This one contains all of two blue-linked terms (one unreferenced), and as such falls squarely under  a dictionary
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)

Comment: The  entry says that lists of dictionary definitions should not be kept, but glossaries of specialized terms should. This creates a great deal of disagreement about what the policy really means. Is this page a forbidden 'list of definitions' or an allowed 'glossary of specialized terms'? This repeated bickering over that ambiguity on each article is ridiculous... as is the claim above that " is unambiguous on this"... it really really isn't. People should leave off the deletion wars and discuss the '''policy''' itself to clearly define what we do and do not incorporate. If 'glossaries' are no longer going to be allowed (though that has been in the policy for a long time) or redefined to exclude pages like this then we should move to Wiktionary... but the proper course of action is to work on a consensus for that policy. Not declare jihad and battle over every involved page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:NOT)