Deletion of The Revengers (film)

Comment: I believe the nomination is misapplying . The fact that this 1972 film is not listed at Rotten Tomatoes has more to do with the web site's limited coverage of older films than with a lack of critical attention to the film. A Google News Archive http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22the+revengers%22&as_ldate=1972&as_hdate=1972&sugg=d&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&sa=N&start=10 search suggests that ''The Revengers'' did receive wide distribution (although most of the sources found are not available free), and at least one review is freely available online: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FR4rAAAAIBAJ&sjid=raEFAAAAIBAJ&pg=814,4892828&dq=the-revengers&hl=en Montreal Gazette.  does not say the "two or more full length reviews by nationally known critics" must be available free online, particularly for films released before the rise of the Internet. It should also be noted that three of the cast members were previous Oscar winners, William Holden, Ernest Borgnine, and Susan Hayward, which implies that the film would have received at least some public attention at the time. If Wikipedia had existed in 1972, I doubt an article on this movie would have been rejected at the time
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:MOVIE||WP:MOVIE)

Comment: with respects to the nominator's good faith, but the film had wide theatrical release in 1972 and commercial re-release in 1979, thus meeting the notability criteria of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NF)

Comment: notable film because it was "directed by Daniel Mann and stars William Holden and Ernest Borgnine."  Once notable, always notable. I'm too young to remember it, and I've been told it was pretty awful, but |that is hardly a reason to delete
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)