Deletion of Mike Stuchbery

Comment: It may be worth it to  here, as the only people who will recreate it will either be a   editor like the creator here, or an alt-right troll. The fact is that the subject is not the "historian" he claimed to be, and as I said in an edit summary, he has quietly altered his online profiles to accept that. From what I gathered, at best he works in popular history, and I mean popular in approach rather than as appeal - he has fewer than 1,000 views on YouTube (yet his channel was mentioned on this article) and even with his recent buzz he hasn't reached the https://www.patreon.com/mikestuchbery_ meagre goal on his Patreon. He may well know more than Paul Joseph Watson but Wikipedia is not here to  - the article on Watson was deleted several times before there was sufficient third-party sources over a stretch of time
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Protection policy (WP:SALT||WP:COI||WP:PUFF||WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS)