Deletion of Mr. Greek

Comment: Every bit of trivial mentions and insignificant coverage can be used to support a statement or augment the details within the article when there's proper references that meet all the criteria of  to establish the foundation to build on. You can round up all the beef trimmings but when you're expected to present a pound slab of high grade steak, the trimmings will never satisfy that. It's not being the first, being in business for a long time or the attributes expressed by an editor here that drives notability. It is the high level of notice and deep coverage by general interest, high circulation media coverage (see  ) that is heavily weighed in notability determination
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NCORP||WP:AUD)

Comment: I generally agree with HighKing's analysis of the sources; most of them are not useful for establishing notability. I think the https://www.thestar.com/business/2014/02/19/mr_greek_establishes_middle_eastern_toehold.html The Star article and the https://torontolife.com/food/restaurants/mr-greek-expands-middle-east/ Toronto Life article come the closest and provide some useful information towards notability. I think this is a case of ; if this company went out of business tomorrow and completely disappeared, would they be notable in the sense of meriting an encyclopedia entry? I'm not convinced that the answer to that is yes. I could vaguely predict that I think the company will probably meet the notability guidelines given time, but the article shouldn't exist until that time when it does become notable. (This is a separate issue, but) even if the subject were presently notable, a lot of the coverage on the page is ; if the page is kept, it needs some trimming
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Too soon (WP:TOOSOON||WP:UNDUE)

Comment: I appreciate that took a lot of time. But based on the references you've provided above, all 17 of them, I think you are confusing the standard required from a reference in order to support a fact or assertion within an article (essentially ) and the standard required from a reference to meet the criteria for establishing notability (which is a lot stricter). The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is for multiple sources (at least two) of |significant coverage with |in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing |"Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source *unaffiliated to the subject*. Let's take a look at each of those 17 references
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:SIGCOV||WP:CORPDEPTH||WP:ORGIND)