Deletion of Reconstructive observation

Comment: Per -REASON an article being a stub and an orphan are not valid deletion arguments. Also, the assessment of the two sources in the article as "poor" is ambiguous, because there's no qualification about how or why they are considered "poor". Likewise for the notion of the topic being "unimportant to its field." I've left a talkback notification on the IP's talk page to notify the initial nominator about this discussion
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL)