Deletion of Carol Margolis

Comment: Notable expert quoted often on the subject of business travel for women, described as an expert, quoted at length in the http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/business/01road.html NY Times, also http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/business/international/businesswomen-navigate-traditions-in-saudi-arabia.html here, and http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/travel/flights/2014/05/27/airline-ticket-fees/9622135/ here, described as a http://www.businessinsider.com/the-best-in-business-travel-carol-margolis-2010-3 travel guru here, quoted in http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/MONEY/usaedition/2012-09-11-airline-turbulence_CV_U.htm USA Today, numerous references (additional ones currently in article) suggests she meets the 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: by  Shad in Net   —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Lacks reliable independent secondary sources that are actually ''about'' the subject needed to establish notability under .  Offered are a link to the subject's book on Amazon, obviously unhelpful, and links to several articles where the subject is quoted.  Those latter articles appear in reliable sources but being quoted, even by the NY Times, is unhelpful in the same way that an entire interview would be:  It's primary, as explained at nterviews#Notability.  (The only difference between this and a full interview is there's less here.)  To be secondary, the article can't just quote the subject, it has to talk about the subject, which none of these sources do
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:I)