Deletion of PowerMILL

Comment: thanks, Mark, for moving these out of the original AFD and into their own. I suppose my initial concern with these three still remains - each is supported by "sources" that range from re-prints of company press releases to papers on functionality written by company employees. There's one or two how-to guides but even they seem to have come from people connected to the company or at least people advised by people from the company. They (all three) seem like a perfect example of why we have . Obviously the nomination is essentially my nomination so I wont !vote, but I suppose it would be fair to say that I wouldn't disagree with a ''Merge'' to Delcam, as I suggested in my original commentary
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PRODUCT)

Comment: into the company as the reasonable solution. If more material is found, it can be separated again. The merge should retain the key information, which I think would be all of the article here except the list of revisions. Anyone urging an outright delete, should explain why a merge isn't suitable, because according to eletion Policy, merges are preferred to deletions
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Disambiguation (:WP:D)