Deletion of General Theory about Compensations

Comment: per |No original research
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR)

Comment: Can anyone say, "'''''Speedy close''' per ''"? &mdash
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Snowball clause (WP:SNOWBALL)

Comment: this |original |opinion piece
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:SOAP)

Comment: Wow. This is almost Time Cube bad. "I would like to show you..." and an e-mail address signals to me that this is a |self-promotion. Even if it isn't, this theory is not notable by any stretch of the imagination. Wikipedia is the ''only'' ghit
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:SOAP)

Comment: as .  The article says, "It can seem the worse thing or the best."  In this case, it's definitely the former
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)