Deletion of Erin Stewart

Comment: Many editors seem to have argued the topic meets . I would disagree. GNG states: "If a topic has received '''significant coverage''' in '''|reliable sources''' that are '''ndependent sources|independent of the subject''', it is '''presumed''' to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:I||WP:reliable sources)

Comment: Cited references satisfy  with substantial independent coverage from local, regional, statewide and nationally recognized sources. See, e.g. http://nbcityjournal.com/archives/10580 New Britain City Journal, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/05/nyregion/at-27-balancing-her-social-life-and-a-citys-budget.html New York Times/Region, http://www.connecticutmag.com/bests-tops/under-class-of/article_6c31b959-728b-583c-a6e5-c5daf1d52ec2.html Connecticut Magazine and https://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/influential-republicans-30-young/2016/01/12/id/709124/ Newsmax. Special:Contributions/24.151.116.12|24.151.116.12
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Mayors do not inherently meet . Her claim to being "the youngest serving female mayor in the United States for a city the size of New Britain" has too many qualifications attached (youngest ''and'' serving ''and'' female ''and'' for a city X size) to be inherently notable. Some sources, like newsmax.com, are of questionable reliability. Other coverage lacks biographical depth
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NPOL)

Comment: per . Sources include the New York Times, NewsMax, and other publications from outside of New Britain. Whatever problems there are with the content itself, the subject is very clearly notable per our |guidelines
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GNG)

Comment: at 72,00 people, I see a slightly better claim to notability than some of the mayors I've nominated for deletion. However, I can't see anything here that would make here pass . All mayors (even of the smallest towns) get at least some newspaper coverage, but it is routine and should not be used to establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN)

Comment: nbsp; The NOTINHERITED idea is at most shifting attention from the mayor of the town, to the town of the mayor.&nbsp; So the NOTINHERITED idea is related to BIO1E, where BIO1E is an argument to merge.&nbsp; {{pb}}A mayor is ''always'' the mayor of a notable town, so any elected mayor ''always'' has a potential merge/redirect target...and ATD prevails over DEL8.&nbsp; Arguing that mayors don't immediately have sustained coverage, and/or stretching GNG to exclude local sources, argues to a failure of WP:N, but not .&nbsp; As to the argument that local sources are a reason to claim that the coverage is not sustained, I find that illogical.&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:DEL8)