Deletion of List of games with unspecified rules

Comment: because not only is the selection criterion arbitray, most of the games are either |made up in school one day or rely on an editor's judgment as to whether they have unspecified rules; one, for example, uses improvised jargon, but that does not mean it doesn't have rules as such.  Virtually none of the entries are actually cited to an independent source which explicitly states that they have unspecified rules
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day (WP:NFT)

Comment: I feel this list borders on being a directory of loosely assosiated topics.  And WP isn't a #DIR|directory of loosely assosiated topics
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: But note that there might be a merger candidate, not in Mornington Crescent (game)|Mornington Crescent, but in nomic.  Because  suggests that disjunctions should be indicated, any merger should be cotangent to avoid the possibility of WP:redirect#Self-links.2C_duplicate_links|loop links, so be certain to place a diaeresis on the originating page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (WP:DASH)