Deletion of Cousin White Paper: Aching Mature Lewdness

Comment: I am not going to repeat my arguments Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wife_Taxi:_Crowded_with_Big_Tits#Wife_Taxi:_Crowded_with_Big_Tits|another time just because somebody who gets regulary his own http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&redirs=0&search=section+Bali+ultimate+prefix%3AWikipedia%3AAdministrators%27+noticeboard&fulltext=Search&ns0=1|dedicated sections on ANI started a mass deletion campaignhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography/Deletion simply based on a massive lack of  as already shown
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)

Comment: Pink film is notable, many specific pink films are notable, I accept the award as apparently notable, and I appreciate that there are articles on them.  I'd like to see more thorough coverage of pornography on Wikipedia.  This specific film is not WP-notable, however.  The film is lacking the sort of |significant coverage from |Reliable sources and consequent |verifiability one would want for an encyclopedia article.  Instead of prose following the topics in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (film) there are bare statements of fact as to having gotten the award, the cast, crew, and a brief plot outline, essentially  apart from a short lede.  If that's all that can be written, then that's a problem.  Merely winning an award is ''not'' a guarantee a film is notable by WP's standards Wikipedia:Notability (films), only a general indicator it ''might'' be if there are RS for things other than the mere fact of winning the award.  It's the existence of RS treating the film as the subject at length that is the measure of WP-notability.  This film could be better treated in a list of films that won the award, if that
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:RS||WP:V||WP:PLOTONLY)

Comment: per comprehensive rationale of Cherryblossom1982, and '''strongly warn''' Carrite about |personal attacks-comment on the article, not the editor
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No personal attacks (WP:NPA)

Comment: I'm concerned that this article cites mainly the web site http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~p-g/ P*G Website -- it is not obvious to me that this is a |reliable source adequate to |verify content or establish |notability
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:V||WP:N)

Comment: Per reasoned comments above, as notability in Japan is notable enough for en.Wikipedia.  Western (or personal) POV should never be used to negatively color discussion of Eastern film, Eastern art, or Eastern culture, as cultural standards greatly vary. Calling something from another country "obscure" is a bit much, as  is not a criteria for deletion
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:UNKNOWNHERE)