Deletion of William Swanberg (2nd nomination)

Comment: classic  situation. Utterly non-encyclopedic
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This article fails |BLP1E for sure. However, as it is primarily about the event you could have gotten arround that by just renaming it great Lego theft or something, but that wouldn't help with the bigger problem, which is that the event itself fails the notability requirement. As  says: "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute sufficient evidence of notability", and that is all you have for this event. This is a classic example of what people want to exclude when the say they don't want Wikipedia to turn into a news service
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E||WP:notability)

Comment: We're in  territory here, but the quality of coverage and unusual type of the case make it notable in my opinion. Still, maybe better covered within some other article (even if I wonder what one
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: I don't see anything unrelated to the Lego theft. Even if criminality extends over a period of time, it needs to be something extraordinary to make it past . It is particularly poorly sourced as well
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: This is really an article about an event, not a person (though titled as such for categorization), so its not really  in that context.  The article doesn't cover his schooling and personal life, etc., like a typical bad bio page -- its focused on the notable event.  I think the essay Wikipedia:News_articles is also useful for consideration.  In the prior AFD (which was yesterday
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)