Deletion of Jason Ravnsborg

Comment: Does not meet  or  - sources given in article are far from sufficient, as are sources to be found online. It is possible he will become notable in the future, but he is not at the present time
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:POLITICIAN||WP:GNG)

Comment: People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being ''candidates'' in future elections — if you cannot show and |properly source that he was ''already'' eligible for an article for some other reason ''independent'' of his candidacy, then he has to ''win'' the election, not just run in it, to become notable because of the election per se. The fact that you can show a handful of campaign coverage does not assist in building a  case, either — ''every'' candidate in ''any'' election ''anywhere'' is ''always'' the subject of a handful of campaign coverage, so that falls under  and does not bolster notability per se. For added bonus, this is written much more like a campaign brochure than an encyclopedia article — so even if he ''were'' notable enough for an article, it ''still'' wouldn't get to look like ''this''. No prejudice against recreation on or after election day if he wins, but nothing shown or sourced here gets him an article today
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:GNG||WP:ROUTINE)