Deletion of Steve Quayle

Comment: Fails .  Sources range from mere passing references to subject,http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2015/02/13/kent-hovind-supporters-gaining-ground/http://www.diariocambio.com.mx/2015/opinion/inteligencia-financiera/item/2431-hay-supremacia-militar-rusahttps://news.google.com/newspapers?id=p1pWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ke8DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6933%2C8739466 to |self-published sources lacking any apparent editorial oversight,http://leavingalexjonestown.blogspot.com/2010/05/great-post-office-conspiracy.htmlhttp://www.christianmediaresearch.com/content/criminal-bill-indictment-broadcaster-bill-brumbaugh-exposed-liar-thief-fraudhttp://marinkapeschmann.com/poison-fruits-christian-alternative-media-stars-steve-qualye-and-doug-hagmanns-swat-allegation-also-fake/ to those w/ clear promotional ties to the subject.http://www.sqmetals.com/http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/steve-quayle-tonight-on-the-hagmann-hagmann-report
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV||WP:SPS)

Comment: Especially when considering  and , there just aren't sufficient good sources to establish significant coverage in reliable sources. &mdash
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Fringe theories (WP:FRINGEBLP||WP:BLPCRIME)