Deletion of Uruguay v Ghana (2010 FIFA World Cup)

Comment: passes  per the sources provided by Strafpeloton2 in this AfD
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SPORTSEVENT)

Comment: Fails . No talk page consensus to take the action taken. Also, while a fuller treatment of any major subtopic should go in a separate article of its own, that is for a representative survey of the relevant literature, not for every detail that can be sourced to a reliable source. For example, one sentence of the new article reads, "In the 58th minute, Gyan's had a low shot to the near post saved by Muslera." The sentence after that is "Five minutes later, Forlán crossed to Suárez for a volley, but Suárez missed wide." These are not major facts or major details, but instead minor facts and minor details. That falls into  - news reporting about ... sports ... can be very frequent and cover a lot of trivia, but using all these sources would lead to overdetailed articles that look like a diary. Not every ... goal scored or hand shaken is notable enough to be included. I hate to request that all this hard work be deleted, but that is required. The main article 2010 FIFA World Cup knockout stage is sufficient to cover the topic and you should get a talk page consensus first before pursuing a 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article size (WP:SUBARTICLE||WP:NOTDIARY||WP:SUBARTICLE)