Deletion of Campo San Bartolomeo

Comment: While the stub obviously needs expansion and references, Google turns up with enough hits and there are articles in a number of other WPs, I see our basic notability criteria for geographic features fulfilled per . This article has potential to grow, if given time to grow. I see no valid reason why we should not give it a chance
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOLAND)

Comment: Plenty of coverage found in seconds. https://books.google.com/books?id=RimhKB4I-uQC&pg=PA82&dq=%22Campo+San+Bartolomeo%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAmoVChMIgbmdj5T1xgIV1JuICh0hxw5O#v=onepage&q=%22Campo%20San%20Bartolomeo%22&f=falsehttp://www.veneziatoday.it/cronaca/turista-picchia-operatore-bani-in-campo-san-bartolomeo.htmlhttps://books.google.com/books?id=NO0uOdRBhS4C&pg=PA34&dq=%22Campo+San+Bartolomeo%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBWoVChMIgbmdj5T1xgIV1JuICh0hxw5O#v=onepage&q=%22Campo%20San%20Bartolomeo%22&f=false and these are just ones found on the internet. By the nom's |original research speculation "doesn't assert any significance, and probably doesn't have any" indicates no  was followed at all
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:NOR||WP:BEFORE)