Deletion of EverQuest timeline (2nd nomination)

Comment: Nominator appears to have a serious agenda since they talk of nominating over 100 articles for deletion, which will overwhelm the system.  Reasons given by nominator |unsourced, |original research, and |fancruft are grounds for improvement, not deletion, and by nominator's own admission may not be relevant to this article. Nominator claims |unnotable and yet provides no indication of what notability criteria they think this article fails.  Most importantly claim by nominator that topic is non-notable because non-fans would not read it shows a lack of understanding of notability.  I am not a fan of hip-hop or opera - but the 'fact' that only fans would read those articles does not mean those articles are non-notable
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:SOURCE||WP:OR||WP:CRUFT||WP:N)

Comment: the entire article is 'in universe' and I can scarecely imagine any way to make this article reflect real world |notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTABILITY)

Comment: as this time line is writen from a heavy in universe perspective and there are no |reliable secondary sources to demonstrate |notability outside of the game. I don't understand why this article was not deleted after the first AfD; its clear this material is available on lots of other fansites, where it belongs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RS||WP:FICT)