Deletion of Michael Brooks

Comment: Prizes themselves seem non-notable, so for me don't help to establish notability of the subject.  Therefore fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)

Comment: well for starters this appears to be a content dispute, and should be resolved as such.  Second... the article currently cites no sources to back up any claims towards  and is in fact completely |unverified.  This to me is absolutely grounds for deletion; but  sourcing exists.  Could someone opining ''keep'' add some sources? (and not the "blog"... that is not a |reliable source
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO||WP:V||WP:AGF||WP:RS)