Deletion of MacDonnell Road (2nd nomination)

Comment: Sigcov in reliable secondary sources hasn't been demonstrated, as basically admitted by the reluctant keep voter above. I've also seen an  argument here. Mundane facts like a malaria outbreak would belong in an article if its subject were notable, but do not themselves establish notability
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:ITSOLD)

Comment: WP:GEOROAD is not proscriptive. It says when roads ''are'' presumed to be notable, but not when they are ''not'' presumed to be notable. In this case, a notable road which meets  and has at least one building on it (without an article as yet) which meets the criteria of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:GEOFEAT)

Comment: per Cunard. Passes . A merge proposal can always be made after this AFD closes on the article’s talk page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: I am reaffirming by deletion vote and would like to add that the relevant guideline for this articleis  which says {{tq|Topic notability for county roads, regional roads (such as Ireland's regional roads), local roads, streets and motorway service areas ''may vary'', and are presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which contain significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject.}} So far the only sources found are either about buildings on the road (not the road itself) or routine local newspaper coverage of the local real estate market
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GEOROAD)