Deletion of Fallout Wiki

Comment: per . The current Fallout Fandom site is actually a merger from two Fallout Wikis, Nukapedia and the Vault, as reflected in the article subtitle and its contents. And there has been sustained coverage about both Nukapedia and the Vault with sources that has yet to be cited in the article
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Per , sources cited by Haleth seem sufficient enough to prove notability
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: Passes minimum notability criteria and  per evidences provided by User:Haleth
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NEXIST)

Comment: per ImaginesTigers. I am not convinced that the sources meet the criteria for  for a standalone article. Being ''cited'' does not confer notability. &spades
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Does not pass  -- unlike Haleth, I find that the sources don't deal with the subject in depth, but only deal with certain related events, basically disputes between a community on the internet and a certain company, which is an immense trope of the videogame culture and the internet as a whole, and not specific to the subject at all -- none of these sources tell us that much about the subject. The Destructoid article ''Fans spend 58 years updating the Fallout New Vegas wiki'' covers a brief phase of the subject's history. That actually appears to be the strongest reference. However, that article is three short paragraphs long, because it essentially addresses a single piece of information, a spike in activity in 2010, which is a minor curiosity, if even that, i.e. a triviality. This is about the sources referenced in this discussion. As to the rest, I've reviewed them too, and I join ImaginesTigers' argument
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:SIGCOV)

Comment: Let's take a look at the sources to determine if they represent sustained, significant coverage. Nine citations. Two are ''from'' the subject in question, a fan-wiki, making it . 4 of the 7 remaining mention The Vault explicitly. Of these, basically none are actually ''about'' The Vault. The ''Kotaku'' and ''Eurogamer'' sources are about fans spending a lot of time editing it. One is about the person who started it. None of these constitute SIGCOF. Subject isn't notable to anyone outside of "|a small population of enthusiastic fans
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:USERG||WP:CRUFT)