Deletion of Anyuta Slavskaya

Comment: Fails  and . There is no sustained  of this woman or her career as a singer, just some routine interviews. There are presently three separate links to her own website in this article, and no fewer then four additional links to places where you can buy her music (Amazon, iTunes, perpetuummusic.ru), while the article has no time to include any inline citations. This article is a  for an unnotable artist and nothing more
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:NSINGER||WP:SIGCOV||WP:PROMO)

Comment: can anyone clarify what these are: https://ukranews.com/news/793853-ukrainskaya-pevitsa-anyuta-slavskaya-zapisala-fit-s-shvedskoj-pop-zvezdoj-80-h 1, https://hochu.ua/cat-stars/novosti-shou-biznesa/article-87014-eksklyuziv-ukrainskaya-pevitsa-anyuta-slavskaya-o-tvorcheskih-ambitsiyah-druzhbe-v-shou-biznese-i-sotsialnyih-proektah/ 2 (rather substantive from the looks of it), https://glavred.info/kultura/471538-anyuta-slavskaya-ukraincy-ne-gotovy-otkazatsya-ot-rossiyskoy-muzyki.html 3, or https://hochu.ua/cat-fashion/news/article-109839-svetskaya-lvitsa-bokser-i-zhurnalist-anyuta-slavskaya-vyipustila-klip-na-pesnyu-magnit-v-kotorom-poyavilas-v-pyati-raznyih-obrazah-video/ 4 (where I think she is just name-cheked). These are all recent news articles. On face value (with reference to ), they certainly look like coverage in reliable sources
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:NOENG)

Comment: per nom ( not met;  not met), and per {{u|Novem Linguae}} (regarding mostly-interview coverage). An interview is not unreliable or non-independent simply because it's an interview, and interviews in combination with regular reporting-style coverage can definitely reinforce a good look for SIGCOV, but there's a big problem when there isn't much potentially relevant coverage in the fist place (which is the case), and what coverage there is is ''mostly interviews''. This view ''does'' align with policy. We can, and need to, look whether the coverage is significant on a per source basis, and not only as a general impression. Interviews are often long, and are something we'd generally call non-trivial, but they're very rarely ''in-depth''. If you couldn't take a published text and derive a few ''factual, own-voice'' content points from it, that could (ostensibly) be incorporated here, it isn't really an instance of in-depth coverage, and generally you ''can't'' do so with interviews: obviously, an individual's views, and their claims (unless they appear somehow reinforced by the interviewer, editor...), are not good references for factual claims on Wikipedia, and can't form a backbone of an article. Keeping based on an argument that what's presented here is significant coverage would be kind of unfortunate
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:SINGER)