Deletion of Keith Marlowe

Comment: this singular example of hagiography.  Singular in that I don't think I have ever seen an article with so many edits where so few of them have been by logged-in users; virtually the entire article is the work of anons.  Not that it's a problem, except in as much as the lack of references makes it necessary to rely on the reputation of the editors, but pretty much the only contribs from accounts with user pages are the addition of tags.  Anyway, appears to fail  and looks very much like more Vaughancruft
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BIO)