Deletion of SteatoTest

Comment: I found three sources that AFAICT aren't primary in the sense of being by authors affiliated with the test or the company that makes it. They are however primary sources in the sense of not meeting , but maybe they can establish notability. The sources are: https://journals.lww.com/eurojgh/Abstract/2011/06000/Validation_of_noninvasive_biomarkers__FibroTest,.9.aspx https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03182.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612568
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:MEDRS)

Comment: and the closer should completely disregard Eastmain's argument as having no policy or guideline basis. We require independent sourcing: none of that exists as pointed out by Jytdog. Merging spam also makes no sense, which means it is not a ''reasonable'' alternative to deletion, as after we merge it we'd just have to remove it again. Deletion is the only outcome supported by our policies here (i.e.  and 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT||WP:DEL)