Deletion of The 404

Comment: podcasts are inherently non-notable per  and . There are no reliable sources independent of the 404 to demonstrate notability. The show's existence is not enough - there must be some evidence of outside coverage not involving self-publication, fanzines, or the like
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V||WP:RS)

Comment: per . There has been no '''independent''' AND '''reliable''' sources provided. Perhaps a redirect to CNET at best
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:WEB)

Comment: Don't lecture me. The fact this is a premature nomination (article clearly shows potential) overrides . Ottre
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:V)

Comment: Sources not sufficient to meet  given that they're mainly from a related website and blogs
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)

Comment: The  is on anyone who would claim that a self-promotional article has potential. I did a bunch of google digging, and the closest I could come is some "about the presenter" boilerplate from what smells press-release-y
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Verifiability (WP:BURDEN)