Deletion of Roger Libby

Comment: I !vote delete per Jytdog and EGF.  My initial reaction is to vote 'keep' and invoke .  However, reading the arguments I'm compelled by Jytdog's argument, .  Instead of citing ARS, I'm now forced to cite 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron (WP:ARS||WP:TNT||WP:AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD)

Comment: I can only find one mainstream RS about this person (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/fashion/07sex.html). The h-index value indicates a lifetime of research, but is not large enough to indicate a major impact on the field per the first criterion of . Appears to not meet other criteria of PROF
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF)

Comment: per . May be possible to create an actual WP article on this guy but I am not willing to put in the time.  If someone ones wants to create an article following deletion, they can
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over (WP:TNT)