Deletion of List of eruvin (3rd nomination)

Comment: This list has clearly defined selection criteria, per . Additionally, the narrow scope of the list complies with . The argument that many of the eruvs don't meet  is a red herring;  explains that {{tq|"one of the functions of many lists on Wikipedia is providing an avenue for the retention of encyclopedic information that does not warrant separate articles"}}. Likewise, the argument that the list is poorly sourced is also misplaced. Per , the solution is to find better sources ({{tq|"If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists (WP:LSC||WP:SALAT||WP:GNG||WP:LSC||WP:ATD)

Comment: per , all that is required is "if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." Also per : "one of the functions of many lists on Wikipedia is providing an avenue for the retention of encyclopedic information that does not warrant separate articles." It has been discussed as a group in numerous places, including these books: https://books.google.ca/books?id=HrFzsP_AbtUC&pg=PA67&dq=eruv+cities+north+america&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCcQ6AEwAmoVChMIztC_hc_0yAIVQ5UeCh0PMwMg#v=onepage&q=eruv%20cities%20north%20america&f=false, https://books.google.ca/books?id=UUmvqyWtY1IC&pg=PA56&dq=eruv+in+cities&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAWoVChMIy76M0c_0yAIVBSgeCh3f0Abu#v=onepage&q=eruv%20in%20cities&f=false, https://books.google.ca/books?id=IBHx1n3rDe4C&pg=PA3&dq=eruv+cities&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=eruv%20cities&f=false and so on. Also the list is clearly useful to readers, and isn't indiscriminate
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NOTESAL||WP:CSC)

Comment: as it is a  subject important to/for :Category:Shabbat, and fits into good , it has lots of  & , and some need updating (that's what happens the older WP gets and the longer "older" sources are not updated by newer editors). In any case, see also OTPAPER, and . Note also the excellent arguments that resulted in resounding Keeps in the 2 prior AFDs in 2008 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of eruvin) and 2007 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of communities with eruv). Thanks
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N||WP:CLNT||WP:RS||WP:CITE||WP:NOTPAPER||WP:DONOTDEMOLISH)