Deletion of List of films that most frequently use the word "fuck" (9th nomination)

Comment: The word, the minimum number of uses of the word (and the choice of an absolute value rather than a frequency), the exclusion of certain films - all are |arbitrarily chosen. The article is nothing but a |list of statistics. The |references are all (in the cases I checked) either dead links or to archives of a single, now defunct, site which does not appear to be |reliable. |I like the idea that such an article exists but there seems to be nothing in WP policy to support its inclusion
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR||WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:V||WP:RS||WP:ILIKEIT)

Comment: No evidence has been presented that consensus has changed in the last 6 months.  Plenty of good arguments to keep presented in the last AFD, very few arguments to delete.  Suspicion that  comes into play here is hard to ignore
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: too arbitrary'' - no, this has a clear inclusion crieteria. It's no less arbitrary than several of the featured lists on WP.  Everything is referenced and your comment "Hopefully the ninth time is the charm here" just smacks of 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)

Comment: and suggest '''early close'''.  No real argument for deleting this list is given; it may be |disliked by some, but this frankly does not justify repetitious attempts to delete it
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions (WP:IDONTLIKEIT)