Deletion of R Viswanathan

Comment: Reliable sources have been found providing significant coverage of the person.  So the primary notability guideline of  has been met.  Nothing else matters
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: nbsp; The WP:Notability of a topic exists independently of either the existence of an article about the topic on Wikipedia, or the content of any such article.&nbsp; Therefore, the absence of notability cannot be determined by only looking at the article.&nbsp; Analysis that leads to a delete outcome should also consider our policy at  (alternatives to deletion), which is a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow.&nbsp
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Deletion policy (WP:ATD)

Comment: nbsp; http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&sl=es&tl=en&u=http://www.rviswanathan.com/Cronista.pdf This translation of an interview with the topic shows the in depth coverage that means that we should keep the material as a stand-alone article.&nbsp; We now have a list of media coverage with more than 40 entries, and additional material can be found on Google news dated 14 September 2011.&nbsp; This set of coverage appears to far exceed  notability guidelines.&nbsp; In addition, the topic meets WP:N notability, "worthy of notice" because readers will expect that this prolific author and speaker and unusually prominent diplomat will have an entry at Wikipedia.&nbsp
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)