Deletion of .BLP (2nd nomination)

Comment: as pure |OR
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:No original research (WP:OR)

Comment: without merge per Izno. The nom's badfaith characterization of the article as trade secret exposure notwithstanding, there is little question that GNG is not met in this case. Rather than couching it in terms of misappropriation, I'd suggest that the article is simply too detailed and that it falls on the wrong side of . (Also: |obligatory
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTGUIDE||WP:BLPDEL)

Comment: without merging for lack of |notability. I explicitly reject comments 2 and 3 made by the nominator as deletion rationale
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:N)