Deletion of Garry Baverstock

Comment: Time to register an opinion on this one. There are an impressive number of sources here and the article is actually fairly well done, but none of those sources are secondary ones asserting notability - they are all primary sources of the actual event or award. The https://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22Garry+Baverstock%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22Garry+Baverstock%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=fpM&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=nws&prmd=imvnso&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=HKQIULDgN4n3mAWjudnTAw&ved=0CCUQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1c6ba3a40a517153&biw=1366&bih=665 Google archives reveal a couple of "said architecture expert" sources, a couple of "developing something in Cottesloe Beach" articles, and a couple in which apparently his uncle was killed on HMAS Sydney. Other than that, nothing. Thus I don't think he passes the , failing the significant coverage and independent of the subject criteria
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)