Deletion of Peter Shalvoy

Comment: As I stated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Raitiere|another AfD, |Conflict of interest (in either the article's author or the editor who nominated it for deletion) is irrelevant to whether an article should be kept. Please do not clutter this discussion with commentary on other editors and their motivations and focus instead on what this discussion is supposed to be about. To be kept, the article's subject must pass '''at least one''' of the 12 Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles|notability criteria for musicians and ensembles. I have formatted the references to make them clearer and have searched pretty exhaustively for any further references (under a variety of search terms, and in a news archive to which I have a subscription http://www.highbeam.com) without success. Unfortunately, at this stage the article's subject doesn't pass the first one:''1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is Wikipedia:independent sources|independent from the musician or ensemble itself and |reliable"''The only work cited in the article which qualifies  as reliable, non-trivial, and independent of the subject is the short spot on Good Day New York (Fox news). Most editors would not consider that "multiple" coverage. Analysis of remaining references:&bull; Padgett, Ray, http://www.covermesongs.com/tag/outkast "Under the Radar: edibleRed", covermesongs.com, July 23, 2010. (website with reader-generated content – not considered a reliable source)&bull; {{Cite web |title=Shalvoy Music |accessdate= August 1, 2010 |url=http://www.shalvoymusic.com/index.html}} (not independent of the subject)&bull;''The Hudspeth Report'', http://www.thehudspethreport.com/ResearchingAtlanta/archivesjklm.htm "Lava", April 2001 (one-line mention of Shalvoy as simply the DJ in a review of an Atlanta dance club – trivial)&bull; Paula Abdul's New Show, World http://wn.com/Paula_Abdul's_New_Show News (nothing at this link concerning Shalvoy – failed verification)&bull; http://soundcloud.com/petershalvoy/melanie-fiona-it-kills-me-shalvoymusic-remix Audio: Melanie Fiona - It Kills Me (ShalvoyMusic Remix), soundcloud.com, December 2009 (simple audio file uploaded by Shalvoy himself – trivial and not independent of the subject)&bull; http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4580604/Hempilation_-_VOL_1_-_Gov_t_Mule___Black_Crowes__ Track listing: Black Crowes & Gov't Mule, Hempilation, Vol. 1, thepiratebay.org (one-line mention of Shalvoy as having been the voice used on one track – trivial)&bull; YouTube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xWJLiQWCI Video: Straight Up by Paula Abdul, Collette McLafferty (edibleRed) featuring Peter Shalvoy (one-line comment on Shalvoy by the uploader – trivial, not a reliable source, and possibly not independent of the subject as well) Note also that this is a cover of a Paula Abdul song by another artist, not Paula Abdul
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (WP:COI||WP:SOURCES)

Comment: Article lacks sufficient '''independent coverage''' to establish the notability requirements at usic and/or reative. All of the sources appear to come from blogs and other un-reliable sources that do not meet wikipedia's standards at Wikipedia:Verifiability. Even the fox news link appears to be a form of blog or self-publishment without the rigourous fact checking that would go into an official article by a staff reporter
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Mediation (WP:M||WP:C)

Comment: in the absence of any further additions of sources which meet the criteria. (a) Both of the above editors are focusing exclusively on the word "multiple" and ignoring on the first and key part of the criteria ''"Has been '''the subject of'''"''. In other words, this person is sufficiciently notable that they have been the main or one of the main subjects of the sources cited, i.e. not trivial mentions. (b) They are also ignoring the second key requirement that these sources be '''|reliable''' and '''independent''' of the subject. The only one which qualifies per (a) and (b) is the Fox spot.Similarly the subject fails to meet criteria '''4.''' ''"Has received '''non-trivial coverage''' of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country."'' Where is the non-trivial coverage from  a reliable source, independent of the subject, in which '''Peter Shalvoy's contribution''' to Paula Abdul's tour is the main or one of the main subjects? So far not even one has been provided
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Reliable sources (WP:RELY)