Deletion of List of victims of the November 2008 Mumbai attacks

Comment: and rename to Casualities of November 2008 Mumbai attacks. #MEMORIAL|Such lists are not encouraged but there is significance of noting particular casualties in the event. These include some personnel from security forces who have been significantly covered and other such victims. And considering that the main article size is 70kb after just three days, I'm not sure if it is efficient in future perspective to merge two articles. I'm, however, against every trivial person being mentioned. I also feel that it was rather improper to list this article for deletion at such an early stage. This is clearly a very much live event which is still unfolding. If the article remains truly trivial in the future and can be accommodated in the article then such merge may be undertaken. ''Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|Leave
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: or '''Rework''' - Casualties of the September 11 attacks is an appropriate treatment, this exhaustive list is not.  Fails because Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of lists  and Wikipedia is not a memorial 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:INDISCRIMINATE||WP:NOTMEMORIAL)

Comment: Many of the votes for delete seem to be misunderstanding policy.  The  rule is as follows: ''Memorials. Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements.'' This is not a page about somebody's departed friend or relative.  This is a page about a historical mass murder.  And the notability rules says "The notability guidelines determine whether a topic is notable enough to be a separate article in Wikipedia. Notability, in the sense used to determine article inclusion, does not directly affect article content.".  That means each member of the list doesn't need to pass , no more than every noun in a prose article does.  Only the totality of the article needs to pass 
Stance: comment
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:N)

Comment: It is the events that are notable, not the individual victims who are mainly non-notable per . Also, listing casualties, some with no more than a graze, among the dead is disrepectful
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT)

Comment: per nom. I am also not happy with the way the "Casualties of Madrid" article has been dealt with. If we were to go by that article's standards, the amount of info left could easily be merged into the main article, which is what I suggest be done in both cases. The 911 article handles the information in a much different way, eschewing lists of names (for obvious reasons) but it both has the encyclopedic qualities that "Madrid" embodies while having enough info to justify a separate article, instead of a merge. Also, don't even start with the continental bias BS. Americans aren't stuck so far up their asses. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre (4th nomination) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of victims of the Columbine High School massacre (2nd nomination). Mourning the dead is #MEMORIAL|not something that Wikipedia should make a spectacle of
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)

Comment: The repeatedly quoted policy  certainly applies, as does the closely-related . Notable people can be handled in their separate articles, but I simply do not see the permissible (by which I mean not violating one of the policies I just listed) encyclopedic value of the names of each person to suffer injury or death in this tragedy
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTMEMORIAL||WP:NOTDIRECTORY)

Comment: This article is grossly outdated and incomplete. If we can edit it to include all the victims and verify all the information, then the list could be kept. Otherwise, it would have to be merged per , and also we don't have an article on the victims of 9/11
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (WP:MEMORIAL)