Deletion of Manuel López (artist) (2nd nomination)

Comment: The article should be retained in the encyclopedia, as the artist clearly meets . The previous version of this article that was deleted was better than this one, and if I can find/make the time to improve this version I will incorporate that material, however I’m travelling for a critical personal matter and don’t know that I can get to it before this closes. This Chicano artist is in the early stages of their career, yet they have received enough significant coverage (not just mentions) from the likes of the Los Angeles Times, the Los Angeles Music Center, Downtown Los Angeles News, The Eastsider, Boyle Heights Beat and more. Their work has been included in two museum shows. He meets . As an aside, I want to say that I find it gut-wrenching when student editors’ good-faith efforts are deleted before they have enough time to develop an article (this one was first deleted 35 minutes after it was created). The school semester is not even over yet, their article has been nominated for deletion twice, and I sincerely doubt the student editor knew they were doing anything "wrong", esp. since they were assigned this artist
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:BASIC)

Comment: Fails  and . As stated in the previous AFD, the ''Los Angeles Times'' article is the only quality reference on the subject, and therefore there simply is not enough RS to meet . I suggest '''Extended confirmed protection''' to prevent article recreation for the closing admin, otherwise this will keep popping up at AFD
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:NARTIST||WP:SIGCOV||WP:GNG)