Deletion of Boyd Bushman

Comment: He is getting ample coverage in reliable sources, thus passing the  just fine
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Subject fails . A list of patents is insufficient to meet Wikipedia's requirements for a notable . As for the UFO claims,  applies, the claims need to be covered by multiple reliable sources, which is not the case
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:PROF||WP:BIO||WP:REDFLAG)

Comment: Concerning . He is real (http://genealogy.az.gov/azbirth/1036/10360170.pdf birth certificate in Arizona), and http://www.tributes.com/obituary/show/Boyd-Bushman-101591746 obituary with info on funeral service location in Tucson, Arizona. He did work at Lockheed. 34 patents via google patent search. All but one mention Lockheed
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: fails 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: to List of hoaxes. Per . He was never noticed or publicized until the hoaxalicious 2014 Youtube video, since taken down at the demand of some supposed copyright holder. Reliable sources have not been supplied so far to establish that he was a prominent scientist at a major company. It seems clear that a Boyd B. Bushman existed, born 20 July 1936 in Arizona, the son of Mitchell Smith Bushman and Glenda Porter Bushman. How would hoaxers have inserted him and his parents and siblings in the 1940 census for Show Low, Arizona? I also found him in the 1956 and 1960 yearbooks for Brigham Young University, and in telephone directories from 1994 through 2002 for Lewisville, Texas, all in databases at Ancestry.com. It is also dubious that a funeral home would publish phony details of his funeral. None  of this makes him notable. No newspaper articles, journal articles, or book references have been found other than for the 2014 Youtube video, except for the supposed 1999 video (a barren entry at IMDB, which is not a reliable source). (added: a few fringe sources at Google Scholar, in the UFOlogy, antigravity, and zeropoint energy ream mention him a having been  a scientist at Lockheed, as far back as 2002. ) The tabloid publications talking about the Youtube video are not reliable sources.  If he secured numerous patents and assigned them to Lockheed, then it is high plausible he worked there at some time in some capacity, as an employee or contractor, in the years the patents were issued. 99.99% of those who worked in some capacity at Lockheed or his other claimed employers  are nonnotable, and neither are most persons securing patents notable.  The 2014 video (see Snopes' discussion) has sufficient coverage to justify including it in a list of hoaxes, and a redirect is preferable to having people repeatedly create articles about him and his absurd claims
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP1E)

Comment: Per Descended and others. Needs obvious work but it passes 
Stance: keep
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG)

Comment: Why is this so difficult? The individual is known for , the release of a YouTube video, and that event fails the guidelines at 
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:ONEEVENT||WP:EVENT)

Comment: this has zero reliable sources, so he fails . Existence (or not) is not notability. He seems to have been a |grunt worker at Lockheed
Stance: delete
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Notability (WP:GNG||WP:MILL)

Comment: There is  going on here. The people !voting "keep" are arguing from the basis of  or . The claim that there is reliable source coverage is a bit of a red herring as I have not seen any in-depth independent sources that we would look for in order to establish a  status of notability for this . Note that the debunking websites which discuss him do so in such an off-handed way that it's probably fine to list this in a List of hoaxes compendium and, if this story gets bigger, we can always  in the appropriate way. —&nbsp;Preceding Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned comment added by
Stance: merge
Cited policy: Wikipedia:Recentism (WP:RECENTISM||WP:ITSUSEFUL||WP:ILIKEIT||WP:FRIND||WP:FRINGEBLP||WP:CFORK)